The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1701 ALGA RD; ; CB891233; PermitLENDER I- c': DECLARATIONS WORKER'SCOMPENSATION OWNEWWILDER CONTMCTOR II in """""""""" Whlle ~ Inspector Green -- (1) Flnance Yellow - Assessor Plnk - Appllcanl Gold ~ Temporary File DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING SERVICES DIVISION CARLSBAD, CA 92009-4859 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE (619) 438-1161 MISCELLANEOUS FEE RECEIPT Applicant Please Prlnt And Flll In Shaded Ana Only PLAN ID NO. 7187 08/21/89 0001 (31 05 Mix 340. io ESTMATED VALUATION 73 LFH PLAN CHECK FEE 001-8100000-8821 IF THE APPLICANT TAKES NO ACTION WITHIN 180 DAYS, PLAN CHECK FEES WILL BE FORFEITED. SUBDIVISION LOT(S1 I LEGAL'~ES~RIFTION ,. __ CHECK IF SUBMITTED: Io ZENERGYCALCS I o 2 1987 ENERGY CALCS / FOR NON RESIDENTIAL BLDGS , ca/ 2 STRUCTURAL CALCS SENT TO APPLICANT CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE White. Flle Y~IIOW. Applicant Plnk . Finance Gold. Assessor ESGIL CORPORATION 0320 CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO. CA 02 I23 (619) 5601468 )ATE : 8 12s f s4 JURISDICTION: CIT Y OF CARL J BAD PLAN CHECK NO: PROJECT ADDRESS: I 7O/ P lbP FILE COPY sq- /A33 SET: I OUPS CDESIGNER eo PROJECT NAME: CK ZB wqlk 0 necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where building codes. @ with the jurisdictionjs .building codes when minor deficien- The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply cies identified checked by building department staff. biloh) are resolved and 0 identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the 0 The plans are being held at Esgil Corp. until corrected 0 jurisdiction to return to the applicant contact person. @ The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Chtsfohhet- P. rn; If UMZ i m.3 f Gra P d A 1/0 Sa& &to rCb3 9206-7 the plan check has OGA OAA Ovw ODM Date: thr Jurisdiction C4R.k BAD Prepared by: - VALUATTON AND PLAN CHECK FEE 0 Bldg. Dept. 0 Esgil PLAN CHECK NO; 49 - I r3.3 BUILDING ADDRESS / >o ALGA l?D APPLICANT/CONTACT chk.f,nhw l4;//UnZiPHONE NO. BUILDING OCCUPANCY A DESIGNER PHONE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR PHONE To tal Value * PP" LltY'S &*sm; ttq / Building Permit fee $- I e22 - Plan Check Fee $ $ 33 ?- 63 CD. ' COMMENTS: 4 I I ENGINEERING CHECKLIST BUILDING PLANCHECK ITEM INCOMPLETE - PROJECT ADDRESS: I%/ /Go N/A - NOT APPLICABLE h&&L* PROJECT NAME: Av1,4* c7&== LEGAL REQUIREMENTS Site Plan da 1. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: north arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed width and dimensioned setbacks. structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way 2. Show on site plan: Finish floor elevations, pad elevations, elevations of finish grade adjacent to building, existing topographical lines, existing and proposed slopes, driveway with / percent (X) grade and drainage patterns. cs/n 0 3. Provide legal description and Assessors Parcel Number. Discretionary Approval Compliance - 4. No discretionary approvals were required. L5. Project complies with all Engineering Conditions of Approval for Project NO. ~~(35-3~' - 6. Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of Approval for Project No. Conditions complied with by: Date: Field Review - 7. Field review completed. No issues raised. - 8. Field review completed. The following issues or discrepancies with the site plan were found: - A. Site lacks adequate public improvements. - B. Existing drainage improvements not shown or in conflict with site plan. - C. Site is served by overhead power lines (Future Improvement Agreement required). - D. Grading is required to access site, create pad or provide - E. Site access visibility problems exist. for ultimate street improvement. turnaround or engineered solution to problem. Provide onsite - F. Other: Dedication Requirements I - J9 . No dedication required. - 10. Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8-1/2" x 11" plat map and submit with a title report and the required processing fee. All easement documents must be approved and signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. The description of the dedication is as follows: Dedication completed, Date: By : mprovement Requirements - 11. No public improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or defective improvements found adjacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction of the City inspector prior to occupancy. __ 12. Public improvements required. construction of public improvements pursuant to Section 18.40 of This project requires the City Code. Please have a registered Civil Engineer prepare appropriate improvement plans and submit for separate plan check process through the Engineering Department. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of permit. The required improvements are: Improvement plans signed, Date: By : - 13. Improvements are required. improvements may be deferred in accordance with Section 18.40 of Construction of the public the City Code. Please submit a recent title report on the property so we may prepare the necessary Future Improvement Agreement. The Future Improvement Agreement must be signed, notorized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Future Improvement Agreement completed, Date : By : Grading Requirements - 13a. Inadequate information available on' site plan to make a determination on grading requirements. Please provide more detailed proposed and existing elevations and contours. Include accurate estimates of the grading quantities (cut, fill, import, export). __ 14. No grading required as determined by the information provided on the site plan. - 15. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer must be submitted for separate NOTE: The Grading Permit must be issued and grading plan check and approval through the Engineering Department. substantially complete and found acceptable to the City Inspector prior to issuance of Building Permits. Grading Inspector sign off. Date: By : Miscellaneous Permits - 16. Right-of-way Permit not required. - 17. Right-of-way Permit required. A separate Right-of-way Permit issued by the Engineering Department is required for the following: - J 18. Sewer Permit is not required. - 19. Sewer Permit is required. A Sewer Permit is required concurrent with Buiiding Permit issuance. The fee required is noted below in the fees section. Industrial Waste Permit is not required. LO. __ 21. Industrial Waste Permit is required. Applicant must complete approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. Permits must Industrial Waste Permit Application Form and submit for City be issued prior to occupancy. Industrial Waste Permit accepted - Date: By : Fees. Required -!$? 22. Park-in-Lieu Fee & 23. Traffic Impact Fee Quadrant: Fee Per Unit: Total Fee: Fee Per Unit: ".- Total Fee: J!& 24. Bridge and Thoroughfare Fee Fee Per Unit: - Total Fee:m $P -/#& 25. Public Facilities Fee required. @ 26. Facilities Management Fee Zone: 19 Fee: I Permit No. - EDU'S: -9 Fee : & 28. Sew Fee : - ral required: ENGINEERING AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE PERMIT I *, PLANNING CHECKLIST Leqend a Item Complete @ Item Incomplete - Needs your action 1, 2, 3 Number in circle indicates plancheck number that deficiency was identified Environmental Review Required: , YES - /NO - TYPE DATE OF COMPLETION: nun Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which Conditions of Approval require action. Discretionary Action Required: YES __ NO TYPE APPROVAL/RES PROJECT NO. OTHER RELATED CASES: c-7- r5-35- DATE : Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of-Approval .. -.... . . .. . - .“ .. . . . ... .~ Landscape: YE4 -/NO - DATE OF A~&OV?.L: Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval .. Coastal : YES 4NO ___ DATE OF APPROVAL: CIDO Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action: Conditions of Approval Site Plan: dm 0 1. 3. 4. -. ioning: 1. 2. 3. 4. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow, property lines, easements, existin,g and proposed width and dimensioned setbacks. structures, streets, existing street improvements, &ght-of-way Show on Site Plan: Finish floor elevations, elevations of finish grade adjacent to building, existing topographical lines, existing and proposed slopes and driveway. Provide legal description of property. Provide assessor‘s parcel number. I. . . .. .. 3 ~:’. Setbacks: Front: Requ i red Shown Int. Side: Required Shown . .. Street Side: .Required Shown Rear: Required Shown Lot coverage: Required Shown Height: Required Shown Parking: Spaces Required Shown Guest Spaces Required Shown Additional comnents and remarks have been made on the building plans. These marked-up plans may be picked up at the Building Department. These marked-up plans must be resubmitted with the revised plans for this project. Have plans been marked up? YES NO OK TO ISSUE &A DATE PLNCK. FRM September 14, 1989 City of Carlsbad Building Department 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009 RE: Crib Walls at Alga Road and Blue Heron Way on the Aviara Project (CT85-35) Plancheck #89-1233. Gentlemen: In response to the City plan check comments dated 8/25/89, the crib walls will be built with the crib wall back drains per the details presented in the San Diego Soils letter dated Sept 11, 1989, titled "Cniwall Drainage Detail, Figure 1." Yours truly, Tony Ge Construction Manager TG/er CRIBWALSAGZ 2011 PALOWR AIRPORT Rom SUITE 206 CARLSBAD,CALIFORNIA 92009 (619)931-1190 F~x:I619)931-7950 SAN DlEGO GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS, INC. SOIL ENGINEERING a ENGINEERING GEOLOGY September 11, 1989 Aviara Land Associates 2011 Palomar Airport Road, Suite 206 Carlsbad, California 92009 Attention: Mr. Tony German Job NO. 05-3179-003-09-10 Log NO. 9-2090 SUBJECT: CRIB WALL DRAINAGE Aviara Carlsbad, California Gentlemen: At your request, we have reviewed the calculations prepared by Retaining Walls Company for the proposed crib walls. In general, the calculations appear to be in conformance with the intent of our recommendations. However, the possibility of seepage forces are not accounted for in the design. It is our opinion that either seepage forces should be accounted for, or they should be eliminat- ed by installing an appropriate back-drain. The attached Figure I presents our recommended crib wall backdrain system. We recommend that these drains be installed behind all walls, or that the walls be backfilled (both behind the walls, and in the cribs) with free-draining granular material. The material should be tested by San Diego Geotechnical Consultants to determine its suitability as backfill. 9240TRADEPLACE,SUITE100~SANDIEGO,CA92126*(619)536-1102~FAX(619)536-1306 A SUBSIDIARY OF THE IRVINE CONSULTING GROUP, INC. -. Aviara Land Associates September 11, 1989 Job No. 04-3179-003-09-10 Log NO. 9-2090 Page 2 If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact the undersigned at your convenience. Very truly yours, SAN DIEGO GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS Project Engineer Anthony eywd F. el fast, Registration Expires: 3-31-91 Principal Engineer RMP/AFB/rp CRIBWALL STABILITY CALCULATIONS Sheet 1/14 Scale 1" = - Date: /u~usr 2. I959 I Scale 1" = P2 = P1/3 Overturning Safety Factor = EMR/MO = 176598/ 92020 = 1.92 .. " RESISTING FORCE=CPlsina+CFucosul( p )+ EF,sina+ PASSIVE+ COHESION INDUCING FORCE = Flcosa = 12449 =c 3112+ 253591 (0.. 58) + 6340+ $3 + tj= 22853 Sliding Safety Factor = 22853/ 12449 = 1.84 - (3) LOCbTION OF FORCE RESULTANT H = ( 176598 - 92020) / 26140 = 3.24 FT. 2.55 i H .:: 5. 10 ". (4) FOUNDATION PRESSURES HEEL PRESSURE = C6( 3.24)-2( 7.42)1+26140/( 7.42)"~ 2169 PSF- TOE PRESSURE = c4( 7.42)-6( 3.24)1+26140/( 7.42)*= 4875 PSF CRIBWALL STABILITY CALCULATIONS Sheet "../A ~~ CRIBWALL STABILITY CALCULATIONS Sheet LL../X Overturniny Safety Factor = CMR/MO = 452894./2I::)1.3.36 = 2u2:3 (2) SLIDING .. rx = 14.0364" sin& = (3.2425 cow = t:).9701 RESISTING FORCE=CPlsina+CFvcos*3 ( ,p )+ CF,sina+ PASSIVE:+. COHE:SlON INDUCING FORCE = Plcoslw = 24684 =C 6171+ 459691 (0.58)+ 11492+ (:I+. iI!s 4 1735 Slidiny Safety Factor = 417331 24684 = I--,.?. .J3) LOCATION OF FOR.CCRE5ULTANl 3.74 < H .f: 7.48 CONSTRUCTION NOTES LWALL OESIGN. AS SHOWN HEREON. IS BASE0 ON TOPOGRAPHY. RETAINING UALLS COMPANY BY OTHERS AS CORRECT. ANY SOIL INFORMATION. AN0 GRAOING ELEVATIONS FURNISHEO TO SUBSEQUENT CHANQES IN FIELO TOPOGRAPHY. OESIGN QRAOES OR SOIL CONOITIONS MAY RESULT IN VARIATION OF UALL SIZE AS FINALLY CONSTRUCTEO. 2INSTALLATION OF DRAINAGE SYSTEMS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BY OTHER THAN RETAINING UALLS COMPANY UNLESS SPECIFICALLY COVEREO IN ERECTION CONTRACT. 31F BUILOINQ FOOTINGS ARE TO BE PLACE0 IN ZONE OF COMPACTED SOIL BEHIND CRIBWALL. SOIL TESTING FIRM MUST VERIFY AOEOUACY OF THIS MATERIAL. AS CONSTRUCTEO. TO SUPPORT THE BUILDING. ?--BACK. STRETCHER. TYP.-FALSE HEADER PLAN VIEW BASE COURSE TYPICAL. TR.IPLE DEPTH Not to Scale TYPICAL PROFILE Not to Scale 2.5' HEADER CENTERS 5.0' STRETCHER LENGTHS TYPLCAL PROFILE NoLgE ?E,*,D,EER,SE,:fi JOINTS [ TYP i ARE FALSE HEADERS. A - 2.5' B - 1.25' . OTHERS ITH "X" FALSE HEADER 1. A. STRENGTH OF MATERIALS COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF CONC4ETE P'c= 3250 PSI YIELD STRENGTH OF STEFL:Fy=60.000 PSI I I I - - 2.5' J .25' I - I .25' - K - - - 1.5" - RE-BAR #4 Y4 Y4 - YE16HlS 95 LBS. 135 LBS. I 125 LBS. 30 LBS. .. TYPICAL CROSS SECTIONS Not to Scale j TYPICAL CROSS SECTION Not to Scale PER SOIL 7- I 5-89 ENGINEER . I * * IN SAN SOIL ENGINEERING DIEGO SOILS 8 ENGINEERINQ ENGINEERING. GEOLOGY INC. July 18, 1989 ! Aviara Land Associates Job NO. 04-3179-003-09-10 2011 Palomar Airpott Road, Suite 206 carlsbad, California 91009 Log NO. 9-1875 Attention: Mr. TOQy German SUBJECT: BEARING CAPACITY FOR CRIB WALL$ Aviara Carlsbad, California ! Genthmfm: A8 requested by Mr. Steve Crosby of Retaining Walls Company, we calculated ths beaiing capacity for crib walls founded on 18 inches of crushed rock oier formational material. The calculation is based on the asaumption that the entire load of the wall is carried by the 6 inch wide: members at the base. It is assumed that the base of Me wall is founded a minimum of 18 inches below lowest adjacent grade. The crushed rock should extend a minimum of 18 inches below the diottom of the lowest crib members, and should extend a minimum of 18 inches outside the crib members. The allowable bearing &pacity for this condition is 5,000 psf. We recommend that the +shed rock contain no particles greater than 3 inches, and no more than 10 percent finer than the No. 4 U. S . Standard Sieve. Some compactive effort should be applied to the rock to ensure the ,maximum rtrenqth 02 the material. If you havo any further questions, please feel free to contact the undersigned at youp. convenience. , Very truly yours, ~ SAN DIEGO SOILS ENG~NEERING, INC, 3 D& T project Engineer Bryan Danielson, R.C.E. C43494 Registration Expires: 6-30-92 Senior Engineer RMP/BD/W VINE CONSULTING GROUP, INC. 0240TRADEPLACE,SU~El00~SANDIEGO,CA9?126*(619)536-1102*FAX(6~~)536-1306 September 11, 1989 Aviara Land i Associates . Job NO. 05-3179-003-09-3.0 2011 Palomar ~irport mad, suite 206 Log NO. 9-2090 Carlsbad, &lifornia 92009 attention: im. Tony German SUBJECT: ;CRIB hLL DRAINAGE ; Carlsbad, California Aviara Gellt1-a: j At your rehest, we have reviewed the calculations prepared by Retaining walls company for the propoaed crib walls. In general, the calculations appear to be in conformance with the intent of our recommendat$ons. However, the possibility of seepage foraes are not accounted for in the design. It is our opinion that either seepage for6.s should be accounted for, or they should be eliminat- ed by installing an appropriate back-drain. Tho attached Figure X presents! our recommended crib wall backdrain system. We recommend that these drains be installed behind all walls, or that the walls be backfilled (both behind the walls, and in the cribs) with freedraining granular material. The material should be tasted by ban Diego Geotechnical Consultants to determine its suitability as backfill. A SUBSIDIARY OFTHE IRWNE CONSULTING QROUP, INC 9240TFIA~PLACESUlTE100~SANDIEG0,CA9Z126=(819~536~1102~PAX:(619)536~1306 . . \ I U x .. .- -.,iviara ~and ~ssociate~ Job NO. 04-3179-003-09-10 September 11, 1989 Log NO. 9-2090 Page 2 j If you have any further questions, please feel tree to contact the undersigned at your oonvenirnce. very truly yours, SAN DIEGO GkOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS I Pro j eat Eng$neer Registration Expires: 3-31-91 Principal Engineer