Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1812 ASTON AVE; ; CB900566; PermitHUILDING PERMIT Permit No: CB900566 :!0/25/90 14:45 Proiect No: A9000668- Pane 1 of 1 ~ -~;I ~ ~ 1 Job Address: 1812 ASTON AV Permit Type : -1LDING Parcel No: 212-120-06-00 ValuatiDn: 2,058,693 Construction Type: VN Liccupancy Group: B2 Descript.ion: 1ST FLR OFF 9850, 2ND F:, 10343 Class Code: - Development No : Str: F1: Ste: ..i - ~..~ .. .. ~.. , r, :., , ,.. ,. ,. : 1ST FLR 44460 MFG F, WHSE SPR GOLF CLUBS Apr/Issue: 10/25/90 Validated Ry: CD Appl/Ownr : CHAPO, GENE 481-7446 SOLANA BEACH, C 535 N. HWY. 101 B OWNER : CORRA-BLACKMOBE 2.0. BOX 424;; RANCHO SANTA $E', 756-1139 ,. *-A* Fees Required 'k+%~ e1 & Credits *** - "_" '" - - -. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Fees : 168., 139. ad Adjust.ments: .00 '. '. ... . , . ,, ,, Total Fees: . 00 168,13.9.00 3,630.00 161:,S09.00 Fee description ~n i t s -Pe e#U&it Ext fee Dat.a .. , Buiidlnq Permit Plan Check Strong Motiotl Fee ErLter 'Y' to Autocalc. P..F..,F. > . . " 309.00 F.M.F./G.M.F. and Zone(99) '72054. O!: Y 25861.ClO ZN 5 Waf f ic Impact Fee ,,. 10065. IO0 Hriclge Fee Enter Number of EDU's 14'752, 00 MFF 34448. Ill) x BUILDING TO'I'AL Enter "Y" for Plumbing Issue 166835.00 Each PlunlbincJ Fixture or Trap > 46. 00 2. 50 115.00 Each Building Sewer > Each Roof Drain > Each Water Heater and/or Vent > 7.110 2.00 2.50 17. 5O Other > 2.50 5.00 10.00 * PLUMBING TOTAL 162.00 Enter "Y" for Electric issue Fee > 5.00 Y Three Phase Per AMP > 2000.00 . 5 0 1000.00 * ELECTRICAL TOTAL ($10 Minimum) 1 (1 0 5 . 0 1.1 Enter 'Y' for Mechanical Issue Fee> 15.00 Y Install Furn/Ducts > 8.00 9.00 72. 00 Each Install/Reloc Appliance Vent > * MECHANICAL TOTAL 11.00 4.50 49.50 . . -.- ' h, 137.00 ' I /~)* ~' :*_ . ._,: ' .;, i >, , 5658, 00 I' .;;;-.:-. +*.~. ,:r~ ..,, .- .. >,'. 3ii78, 00 ',, .I 7 . 5 11 Y I. un 6.50 6. SI1 10.00 PUMP I I PERMIT APPLICATION City of Carlsbad Building Department 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (6191 438-1161 EST. VAL PLAN CK DEW1 d & 3d VALID. BY 1. PERMIT TYPE A - OCMMERCIAL UNEU CITY STATE ZIP CCOE DAY TELEPHONE STATE LIC. x LlCEWSE CLASS CIlI BUSINESS LIC. P SlGNAlURE TITLE DESIGNER NAME DATE ADDRESS SIGNATURE 8. OWNER-BUILDER DECLARATION DATE Owner-Builder Declaration: I hereby afflrm that I em exempf frm the Confractor'r Llcense Law for The folloulng reason: DEPT: BUILDING ENGINEERING "PLANNING U/M WATER PLAN CHECK#: CB900566 PROJECT NAME: 1ST FLR OFF 9850, 2ND FL 10343 PERMIT#: CB900566 DATE: 06/20/91 PERMIT TYPE: COM 1ST FLR 44460 MFG & WHSE SPR GOLF CLUBS ADDRESS: A8812 ASTON AV CONTACT PERSON/PHONE#: TOM/931-1676 SEWER DIST: WATER DIST: ........................................................................... INSPECTED BY: fl. &d& INSPECTED DATE BY : INSPECTED: APPROVED - DISAPPROVED - DATE INSPECTED: %fi/q/ APPROVED b( DISAPPROVED - INSPECTED DATE BY : INSPECTED: APPROVED DISAPPROVED - """"""_"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" ....................................... COMMENTS : FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION DEPT: BUILDING ENGINEERING FIRE PLANNING' U/M WATER PLAN CHECK#: CB900566 DATE: 06/20/91 PROJECT NAME: 1ST FLR OFF 9850, 2ND FL 10343 PERMIT#: CB900566 PERMIT TYPE: COM 1ST FLR 44460 MFG & WHSE SPR GOLF CLUBS ADDRESS: 1812 ASTON AV CONTACT PERSON/PHONE#: TOM/931-1676 SEWER DIST: WATER DIST: ....................................... ....................................... ?I- 62 I INSPECTED BY: INSPECTED: 7- /y- ?/ APPROVED - J DISAPPROVED - INSPECTED DATE BY: INSPECTED: APPROVED - DISAPPROVED - INSPECTED DATE BY : INSPECTED: APPROVED - DISAPPROVED - .. ....................................... """"""_"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" COMMENTS : &,; -3 ./&Lib E.. A- c $h>& rrpzu?, 0% AA ca4&Gk( LP"' x sc/Icp?:A, of e&++ >A bar&) * -A;+! - GhCk &r O* c~A P-8 IpWkfb N* h P, FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION DEFT: BUILDING ENGINEERING FIRE PLANNING U/M WATER PLAN CHECK#: CB900566 PERMIT#: CB900566 PROJECT NAME: 1ST FLR OFF 9850, 2ND FL 10343 DATE: 06/20/91 PERMIT TYPE: COM 1ST FLR 44460 MFG & WHSE SPR GOLF CLUBS ADDRESS: 1812 ASTON AV CONTACT PERSON/PHONE#: TOM/931-1676 SEWER DIST: WATER DIST: ""_"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" ....................................... BY: DATE INSPECTED: 6-a-f/ APPROVED - DISAPPROVED & INSPECTE BY: DATE INSPECTED: Pfi -9/ APPROVED 2 DISAPPROVED - FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION DEPT: BUILDING ENGINEERING FIRE PLANNING U/M WATER PLAN CHECK#: CB900566 DATE: 06/20/91 PROJECT NAME: 1ST FLR OFF 9850, 2ND FL 10343 PERMIT#: CB900566 PERMIT TYPE: COM 1ST FLR 44460 MFG ti WHSE SPR GOLF CLUBS ADDRESS: 1812 ASTON AV CONTACT PERSON/PHONE#: TOM/931-1676 SEWER DIST: WATER RXST: INSPECTED BY: &Ad INSPECTED BY : INSPECTED BY : DATE INSPECTED: DATE INSPECTED: DATE INSPECTED: APPROVED APPROVED APPROVED - I/ DISAPPROVED - - DISAPPROVED - DISAPPROVED - - ................................... ~"""""""""""""""""""---"""-----"""-""""~~~~~~~~~ COMMENTS : \-I " " FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION DEPT: BUILDING ENGINEERING FIRE PLANNING U/M WATER - PLAN CHECK#: CB900566 DATE : PERMIT#: CB900566 PERMIT PROJECT NAME: 1ST FLR OFF 9850, 2ND FL 10343 1ST FLR 44460 MFG & WHSE SPR GOLF CLUBS ADDRESS: 1812 ASTON AV CONTACT PERSON/PHONE#: TOM/931-1676 SEWER DIST: WATER DIST: 06/20/91 TYPE: CON """"-=""""""""""""""""-""""""""""~""""""- """"_ INSPECTED DATE BY: fd. INSPECTED: APPROVED - DISAPPROVED& INSPECTED DATE BY: INSPECTED: APPROVED - DISAPPROVED - INSPECTED DATE BY : g.d INSPECTED: 7-L9/ APPROVED - DISAPPROVED J -_ .. L INSPECTION REQUEST CITY OF CARLSBAD PERMIT# CB900566 FOR 08/05/91 INSPECTOR AREA MC DESCRIPTION: 1ST FLR OFF 9850, 2ND FL 10343 PLANCK# CB900566 TYPE: COM CONSTR. TYPE NEW JOB ADDRESS: 1812 ASTON AV STR: FL: APPLICANT: CHAPO, GENE PHONE: 481-7446 STE : CONTRACTOR: PHONE : OWNER: COBRA-BLACKMORE PARTNERS PHONE: 756-1139 1ST FLR 44460 MFG & WHSE SPR GOLF CLUBS OCC GRP REMARKS: MH/PAT/929-0377 INSPECTOR SPECIAL INSTRUCT: MER - SEE ROB HIRSCH AT JOBSITE TOTAL TIME : --RELATED PERMITS" PERMIT# TYPE STATUS RW900068 ROW ISSUED SE900140 SWOW CB910551 SIGN ISSUED CB910557 MECH ISSUED CB910621 MECH ISSUED ISSUED CD LVL DESCRIPTION ACT COMMENTS 19 ST Final Structural fr 29 PL Final Plumbing 49 ME Final Mechanical 39 EL Final Electrical " " " DATE DESCRIPTION 073191 Final Combo 071291 Rough/Ducts/Dampers 061791 Final Combo 070591 Interior Lath/Drywall 061491 Final Combo 061191 Final Combo 060791 Final Combo 060691 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 052491 Rough/Topout 051791 Gas/Test/Repairs 051691 Gas/Test/Repairs 050791 Rough Electric 043091 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 043091 Rough Electric 042691 Rough/Ducts/Dampers 042691 Rough Electric 042491 Interior Lath/Drywall 042391 Interior Lath/Drywall 042391 Insulation 042291 Insulation 041991 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 050291 Rough/Ducts/Dampers ACT co co AP PI co PI co PI AP AP AP PI co co PI co co PA NR PA co AP MPC INSP MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC COMMENTS SEE LIST 7/31/91 SEE INSP COMMENTS HEAD PREP AREA SOFFIT REINSPECTION STILL W/CORR IN PROGRESS SEE LIST SEE LIST DTD 6-7-91 SEE INSP NOTES 6-6-91 GAS LN SUPPRTS/BRACING 24 HR REC.60 PSI TEST STARTED 60 PSI 24 HR TEST SEE COMMENTS 5/7/91 SEE COMMENTS 5/2/91 SEE COMMENTS 4/30/91 SEE COMMENTS 4/30/91 SEE COMMENTS 4/26/91 NEW OFFICES/REV. PLN SEE COMMENTS 4/26/91 NEW OFFICES NDS STAIRWAY WALL INSUL NDS R-19 @ NEW OFFICES NEW RMS REV. PLANS _. INSPECTION REQUEST CITY OF CARLSBAD PERMIT# CB900566 FOR 08/05/91 INSPECTOR AREA MC DESCRIPTION: 1ST FLR OFF 9850, 2ND FL 10343 PLANCK# CB900566 TYPE: COM CONSTR. TYPE NEW JOB ADDRESS: 1812 ASTON AV STR: FL: STE : 1ST FLR 44460 MFG & WHSE SPR GOLF CLUBS OCC GRP ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION Insulation 041991 041691 041191 040991 040891 040591 032791 032591 031991 031991 031591 031591 031391 030791 030191 030191 030191 030191 022691 022691 022691 022691 022191 022191 022191 022191 022191 022091 021991 021991 021991 021991 021491 021491 020491 020191 020191 013191 012991 012891 012591 012391 011891 011491 011191 011091 010991 010991 Rough Combo Rough Combo Rough Combo Rough Combo Rough Combo Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Compliance Investigation Insulation Insulation Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Rough Electric Interior Lath/Drywall Interior Lath/Drywall Rough Electric Interior Lath/Drywall Rough Electric Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Rough Electric Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Rough/Ducts/Dampers Interior Lath/Drywall Ftg/Foundation/Piers Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Rough/Topout Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Rough Electric Interior Lath/Drywall Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Rough/Topout Rough Electric Rough/Ducts/Dampers Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Interior Lath/Drywall Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Ftg/Foundation/Piers Underground/Conduit-Wiring Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Steel/Bond Beam Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Interior Lath/Drywall Interior Lath/Drywall Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Roof/Reroo€ Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Steel/Bond Beam ACT INSP COMMENTS AP MPC 2ND FLR, FIRE SAFING PA PK NR PK co PK NS PK AP PK AP TP NR PK eo MPC PA MPC PI MPC eo MPC eo MPC PA MPC PA MPC eo MPC eo MPC eo MPC PA MPC PA MPC PA MPC PA MPC eo MPC eo MPC eo MPC eo MPC eo MPC PA MPC PI MPC PI MPC PA MPC PA MPC PI MPC PA MPC AP MPC PA MPC PA MPC PA MPC AP MPC PA MPC PA MPC PA MPC PA MPC co MPC AP MPC eo MPC PA MPC PA MPC CEILING 1ST FLOOR 1ST FLOOR 2ND FLOOR CEILING METAL HNDRL ATCHD @ ENTRY STR CHECK-UP ONLY ND FIRESAFING/2ND FLR STRFRNT 1ST FLR STRFRNT WALLS SEE COMMENTS 3/15/91 SEE COMMENTS 3/15/91 SEE COMMENTS 3/8/91 2ND FLR OFFICE & CORR WALLS SEE COMMENTS 3/1/91 OFFICE & CORR WALLS SEE COMMENTS 3/1/91 OFFICE WALLS BATHROOMS STAIRS & OFFICE/PROD DIM WALL SEE INSP NOTES DTD 2/21/91 SEE INSP NOTES DTD 2/21/91 SEE INSP NOTES DTD 2/21/91 SEE INSP NOTES DTD 2/21/91 SEE INSP NOTES DTD 2/21/91 1 SIDE ELECT RM WALLS & STAIRS WALLS, OFFICE AREAS H20,WASTE & VENTS VENT,SYSTEMS DUCTS, PROD.AREA OFFICE WALLS 2ND FLR STL LEDGER NLNG INSIDE ELEV.SHAFT WALL NDS 18" MIN GR COVER/LITE PED PARKING LIGHT POLE PIERS NO PREVIOUS INSP OF FOOTINGS 2ND FLOOR BN @ STL LEDGER UPPER PART/HIGH WALLS SEE COMMENTS 1/28/91 UPPER PART OF HIGH WALLS FULL HGHT METAL STUDS SEE COMMENTS 1/14/91 SEE COMMENTS 1/11/91 REST OF COLUMN BASES COLUMN BASES EXCPT @ GRID D-7 SEE COMMENTS/1/9/91 / -. - ._. CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT# CB900566 FOR 08/05/91 INSPECTOR AREA MC DESCRIPTION: 1ST FLR OFF 9850, 2ND FL 10343 TYPE: COM CONSTR. TYPE NEW JOB ADDRESS: 1812 ASTON AV STR: FL: STE : 1ST FLR 44460 MFG & WHSE SPR GOLF CLUBS PLANCK# CB900566 OCC GRP DATE DESCRIPTION 010791 010891 010791 010491 122690 122190 122090 121990 121490 121290 121290 121090 120790 120690 120790 120690 120690 120590 120490 113090 113090 112990 112890 112790 112690 112190 112090 111690 111590 111490 111390 110990 110890 110790 110690 102690 103190 102690 ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** ACT INSP COMMENTS Ftg/Foundation/Piers Steel/Bond Beam Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Steel/Bond Beam Ftg/Foundation/Piers Underground/Conduit-Wiring Ftg/Foundation/Piers Steel/Bond Beam Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Steel/Bond Beam Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Underground/Conduit-Wiring Ftg/Foundation/Piers Underground/Under Floor PA PA PA CA PI PA PA co PA PA PA NR PA AP PA PA PA NR NR PA PA co PA NR PA co PA NR co PI PA PA PA PA NR PA PA AP MPC MPC MPC MPC PC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC PD MP MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC PK MPC PK MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC COLUMN BASES LOADING DOCK SLAB ELEV PIT WALLS RESET TO 1/7/91 PERIMETER GROUT SLAB CLOSURE STRIP SLAB CLOSURE STRIPS SEE COMMENTS 12/14/90 LD'NG DOCK WALL FTNGS REST OF WALL PANELS CONC. COLUMNS UFER GRND SEE COMMENTS 12/07/90 NORTH & WEST PER FTNGS CONC. WALL PANELS CONC. WALL PANELS GB @ GRID 4 & PANELS E-7&8, NlO&ll,S-3, 6 THRU 9 SEE COMMENTS 11/29/90 CAISSONS GRID D-7 D-8 F-7 F-8 SEE COMMENTS 11/21/90 CAISSONS GRID 8 (D-F) SEE COMMENTS 11/15/90 SLAB PREP STOREFRONT FOOTINGS SLAB & CAISSONS W/SP. INSP. 2 F-15 & 1 F-5 INTERIOR PIERS & ELEV PITS U.G.FEEDERS TO SUB-PANELS SEE COMMENTS 10/26/90 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CORRECTION NOTICE 0 APPROVED PLANS SHALL BE ON JOB SITE PLUMBING 0 UNDERGROUND PLUMBING m;c;peo. 0 UNDERGROUND WATFR urn/fip"L /y"/*-C -, copy ELECTRICAL 0 TEMPORARY SERVICE 0 ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND 0 ROUGH ELECTRIC 0 G.F.I. 0 SMOKE DETECTOR MISCELLANEOUS 0 PLENUM AND DUCTS 0 COMBUSTION AIR 0 CONDITIONED AIR SYSTEMS 0 SOLAR 0 GRADING 0 POOL 0 PATIO 0 SIGN OTHER CITY OF CARLSBAD I' INSPECTION REQUEST PERMTi4 CB<00566 FOR 07/30/91 INSPECTOR AREA MC DESCRIPTION: 1ST FLR OFF 9850, 2ND FL 10343 PLANCK# CB900566 TYPE: COM CONSTR. TYPE NEW JOB ADDRESS: 1812 ASTON AV STR: FL: CONTRACTOR: PHONE : 1ST FLR 44460 MFG & WHSE SPR GOLF CLUBS OCC GRP APPLICANT: CHAPO, GENE PHONE: 481-7446 OWNER: COBRA-BLACKMORE PARTNERS PHONE: 756-1139 STE : REMARKS: MH/PAT/929-0377 INSPECTOR SPECIAL INSTRUCT: DUST COLLECTION SYSTEM. FIRE 10:00, BLDG INSP 1O:OO PLEASE / TOTAL TIME: --RELATED PERMITS-- PERMIT# TYPE STATUS RW900068 ROW ISSUED SE900140 SWOW ISSUED CB910551 SIGN ISSUED CB910557 MECH CB910621 MECH ISSUED ISSUED CD LVL DESCRIPTION ACT COMMENTS 19 ST Final Structural 29 PL Final Plumbing 39 EL Final Electrical 49 ME Final Mechanical " " " ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE 071291 070591 061791 061491 061191 060791 060691 052491 051791 051691 050791 050291 043091 043091 042691 042691 042491 042391 042391 042291 041991 041991 DESCRIPTION Rough/Ducts/Dampers Interior Lath/Drywall Final Combo Final Combo Final Combo Ftg/Foundation/Piers Final Combo Rough/Topout Gas/Test/Repairs Gas/Test/Repairs Rough Electric Rough/Ducts/Dampers Rough Electric Ftg/Foundation/Piers Rough Electric Rough/Ducts/Dampers Interior Lath/Drywall Interior Lath/Drywall Insulation Insulation Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Insulation ACT INSP AP MPC CO MPC PI MPC PI MPC CO MPC PI MPC AP MPC CO MPC AP MPC PI MPC AP MPC CO MPC CO MPC PI MPC CO MPC CO MPC NR MPC PA MPC PA MPC AP MPC CO MPC AP MPC COMMENTS HEAD PREP AREA SOFFIT SEE INSP COMMENTS REINSPECTION STILL W/CORR IN PROGRESS SEE LIST SEE LIST DTD 6-7-91 GAS LN SUPPRTS/BRACING SEE INSP NOTES 6-6-91 24 HR REC.60 PSI TEST STARTED 60 PSI 24 HR TEST SEE COMMENTS 5/7/91 SEE COMMENTS 5/2/91 SEE COMMENTS 4/30/91 SEE COMMENTS 4/30/91 SEE COMMENTS 4/26/91 SEE COMMENTS 4/26/91 NEW OFFICES/REV. PLN NEW OFFICES NDS STAIRWAY WALL INSUL NDS R-19 @ NEW OFFICES NEW RMS REV. PLANS 2ND FLR, FIRE SAFING 0 APPROVED PLANS SHALL BE ON JOB SITE 0 MASONRY 0 G.F.I. 0 SMOKE DETECTOR TIME DATE 1. CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT# CB900566 FOR 07/12/91 INSPECTOR AREA MC DESCRIPTION: 1ST FLR OFF 9850, 2ND FL 10343 TYPE: COM CONSTR. TYPE NEW 1ST FLR 44460 MFG & WHSE SPR GOLF CLUBS PLANCK# CB900566 OCC GRP JOB ADDRESS: 1812 ASTON AV STR: FL: STE : APPLICANT: CHAPO, GENE PHONE: 481-7446 CONTRACTOR: PHONE : OWNER: COBRA-BLACKMORE PARTNERS PHONE: 756-1139 REMARKS: RS/TOM/929-0377 INSPECTOR d SPECIAL INSTRUCT: TOTAL TIME: --RELATED PERMITS” PERMIT# TYPE RW900068 STATUS SE900140 SWOW ISSUED ISSUED CB910551 SIGN ISSUED CB910557 MECH CB910621 MECH ISSUED ISSUED CD LVL DESCRIPTION ACT COMMENTS 44 - Rough/Ducts/Dampers c*, * ***** INSPECTION HIS ACT INSP AP MPC HEAD PREP AREA SOFFIT DATE DESCRIPTION 070591 061791 061491 061191 060791 060691 052491 05179,l 051691 050791 050291 043091 043091 042691 042691 042491 042391 042391 042291 041991 041991 041691 041191 040991 040891 Interior Lath/Drywall Final Combo Final Combo Final Combo Final Combo Rough/Topout Ftg/Foundation/Piers Gas/Test/Repairs Gas/Test/Repairs Rough Electric Rough/Ducts/Dampers Rough Electric Ftg/Foundation/Piers Rough/Ducts/Dampers Rough Electric Interior Lath/Drywall Interior Lath/Drywall Insulation Insulation Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Insulation Rough Combo Rough Combo Rough Combo Rough Combo PI MPC CO MPC PI MPC CO MPC PI MPC AP MPC AP MPC AP MPC PI MPC CO MPC CO MPC PI MPC CO MPC CO MPC PA MPC NR MPC PA MPC AP MPC CO MPC AP MPC PA PK NR PK co PK NS PK REINSPECTION STILL W/CORR IN PROGRESS SEE LIST SEE LIST DTD 6-7-91 SEE INSP NOTES 6-6-91 GAS LN SUPPRTS/BRACING 24 HR REC.60 PSI TEST STARTED 60 PSI 24 HR TEST SEE COMMENTS 5/7/91 SEE COMMENTS 5/2/91 SEE COMMENTS 4/30/91 SEE COMMENTS 4/30/91 SEE COMMENTS 4/26/91 NEW OFFICES/REV. PLN SEE COMMENTS 4/26/91 NEW OFFICES NDS STAIRWAY WALL INSUL NDS R-19 @ NEW OFFICES NEW RMS REV. PLANS CEILING 1ST FLOOR 2ND FLR, FIRE SAFING 1ST FLOOR June 27, 1991 Royce Ranada 9257 Mission Gorge Rd Santee, Ca 92071 BUILDING PERMIT CB 91-557 DUST COLLECTION SYSTEX Our building inspector, Mer Camero, inspected this system today. The dust collectors for System 1 and System 2 are placed on the loading dock of the building. Mer inquired about the anchorage and was told there was none. Please submit two plans showing how the collectors are attached and 7 L"L he' compliance with seismic requirements. CARTER DARNELL, PLANCEECK COORDPTOR c Mer Camero Encl: Application cd "~ "" __ ~- 2075 Las Palrnas Drive - Carlsbad. California 92009 - (619) 438-1161 PERMIT# CB900566 INSPECTION REQUEST CITY OF CARLSBAD FOR 06/07/91 INSPECTOR AREA MC DESCRIPTION: 1ST FLR OFF 9850, 2ND FL 10343 PLANCK# CB900566 TYPE: COM CONSTR. TYPE NEW JOB ADDRESS: 1812 ASTON AV STR: FL: STE : APPLICANT : CHAP0 , GENE PHONE: 481-7446 CONTRACTOR: PHONE : OWNER: COBRA-BLACKMORE PARTNERS PHONE: 756-1139 1ST FLR 44460 MFG & WHSE SPR GOLF CLUBS OCC GRP REMARKS: RS/TOM/931-1676 SPECIAL INSTRUCT: TOTAL TIME: --RELATED PERMITS” PERMIT# TYPE STATUS RW900068 ISSUED ~~~~ ~~~~~ SE900140 SWOW ISSUED CB910551 SIGN ISSUED CB910557 MECH ISSUED CB910621 MECH ISSUED CD LVL DESCRIPTION ACT COMMENTS 19 ST Final Structural 29 PL Final Plumbing 39 EL Final Electrical 49 ME Final Mechanical ” ” ” ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION 052491 Rough/Topout 051791 Gas/Test/Repairs 051691 Gas/Test/Repairs 050791 Rough Electric 050291 Rough/Ducts/Dampers 043091 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 043091 Rough Electric 042691 Rough Electric 042491 Interior Lath/Drywall 042391 Interior Lath/Drywall 042391 Insulation 042291 Insulation 041991 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 041991 Insulation 041691 Rough Combo 041191 Rough Combo 040991 Rough Combo 040891 Rough Combo 040591 Rough Combo 032791 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 032591 compliance Investigation 042691 Rough/Ducts/Dampers ACT INSP AP MPC AP #PC AP MPC PI MPC CO MPC CO MPC CO MPC PI MPC CO MPC PA MPC NR MPC co MPC PA MPC AP MPC AP MPC PA PK NR PK NS PK CO PK AP PK AP TP NR PK COMMENTS GAS LN SUPPRTS/BRACING 24 HR REC.60 PSI TEST STARTED 60 PSI 24 HR TEST SEE COMMENTS 5/7/91 SEE COMMENTS 5/2/91 SEE COMMENTS 4/30/91 SEE COMMENTS 4/30/91 SEE COMMENTS 4/26/91 SEE COMMENTS 4/26/91 NEW OFFICES/REV. PLN NEW OFFICES NDS STAIRWAY WALL INSUL NDS R-19 @ NEW OFFICES NEW RMS REV. PLANS 2ND FLR, FIRE SAFING CEIWNG 1ST FLOOR 1ST FLOOR 2ND FLOOR CEILING METAL HNDRL ATCHD @ ENTRY STR CHECK-UP ONLY INSPECTION REQUEST CITY OF CARLSBAD PERMIT# CB900566 FOR 05/02/91 INSPECTOR AREA MC DESCRIPTION: 1ST FLR OFF 9850, 2ND FL 10343 TYPE: COM CONSTR. TYPE NEW JOB ADDRESS: 1812 ASTON AV APPLICANT : CHAP0 , GENE CONTRACTOR: PHONE : OWNER: COBRA-BLACKMORE PARTNERS PHONE: 756-1139 1ST FLR 44460 MFG & WHSE SPR GOLF CLUBS PLANCK# CB900566 OCC GRP STR: FL: STE : PHONE: 481-7446 REMARKS: MH/TOM/931-1676 SPECIAL INSTRUCT: INTERIOR INSPECTOR i TOTAL TIME: --RELATED PERMITS-- PERMIT# TYPE STATUS RW900068 ROW ISSUED SE900140 SWOW ISSUED CB910551 SIGN ISSUED CD LVL DESCRIPTION ACT COMMENTS 44 ME Rough/Ducts/Dampers - @ W/&L d/ " LWL ,I " O/CT.I/ o~~-hz&5 " ~.cLe/akpr/cb qr B-vwfg " ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION 043091 Rough Electric 042691 Rough/Ducts/Dampers 042691 Rough Electric 042491 Interior Lath/Drywall 042391 Interior Lath/Drywall 042391 Insulation 042291 Insulation 041991 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 041991 Insulation 041691 Rough Combo 041191 Rough Combo 040991 Rough Combo 040891 Rough Combo 040591 Rough Combo 032791 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 032591 compliance Investigation 031991 Insulation 031991 Insulation 031591 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 031391 Interior Lath/Drywall 030791 Interior Lath/Drywall 030191 Interior Lath/Drywall 043091 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 031591 Rough Electric 030191 Rough Electric 030191 Rough Electric 030191 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding ACT co PI co co NR PA PA co AP AP NR PA co AP NS AP NR co PA PI co PA co PA co co co INSP MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC PK PK PK PK TP PK MPC PK MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC COMMENTS SEE COMMENTS 4/30/91 SEE COMMENTS 4/30/91 SEE COMMENTS 4/26/91 SEE COMMENTS 4/26/91 NEW OFFICES/REV. PLN NEW OFFICES NDS STAIRWAY WALL INSUL NDS R-19 @ NEW OFFICES NEW RMS REV. PLANS 2ND FLR, FIRE SAFING CEILING 1ST FLOOR 1ST FLOOR 2ND FLOOR CEILING METAL HNDRL ATCHD @ ENTRY STR ND FIRESAFING/2ND FLR STRFRNT CHECK-UP ONLY SEE COMMENTS 3/15/91 1ST FLR STRFRNT WALLS SEE COMMENTS 3/15/91 SEE COMMENTS 3/8/91 2ND FLR OFFICE & CORR WALLS SEE COMMENTS 3/1/91 SEE COMMENTS 3/1/91 \ CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT# CB900566 FOR 05/02/91 DESCRIPTION: 1ST FLR OFF 9850, 2ND FL 10343 TYPE: COM JOB ADDRESS: 1812 ASTON AV INSPECTOR AREA MC PLANCK# CB900566 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE NEW 1ST FLR 44460 MFG & WHSE SPR GOLF CLUBS STR: FL: STE : ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** 022691 022691 022691 022691 022191 022191 022191 022191 022191 022091 021991 021991 021991 021991 021491 021491 020491 020191 020191 013191 012991 012891 012591 012391 011891 011491 011191 011091 010991 010991 010891 010791 010791 010491 122690 122090 122190 121990 121490 121290 121290 121090 120790 120690 120790 120690 120690 120590 DATE DESCRIPTION Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding .~ Rough- Electric Rough/Ducts/Dampers Interior Lath/Drywall Ftg/Foundation/Piers Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Rough/Topout Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Rough Electric Interior Lath/Drywall Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Rough/Topout Rough Electric Rough/Ducts/Dampers Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Interior Lath/Drywall Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Ftg/Foundation/Piers Underground/Conduit-Wiring Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Steel/Bond Beam Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Interior Lath/Drywall Interior Lath/Drywall Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Roof/Reroof Ftg/Foundation/Piers Steel/Bond Beam Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Steel/Bond Beam Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Steel/Bond Beam Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Underground/Conduit-Wiring Ftg/Foundation/Piers Steel/Bond Beam Ftg/Foundation/Piers Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Ftg/Foundation/Piers ACT INSP PA MPC PA MPC PA MPC PA MPC co MPC co MPC co MPC co MPC co MPC PA MPC PI MPC PI MPC PA MPC PA MPC PI MPC PA MPC AP MPC PA MPC PA MPC PA MPC AP MPC PA MPC PA MPC PA MPC PA MPC co MPC AP MPC co MPC PA MPC PA MPC PA MPC PA MPC PA MPC CA PC PI MPC PA MPC PA MPC PA MPC co MPC PA MPC NR MPC PA MPC AP MPC PA MPC PA MPC PA MPC NR MPC PA MPC COMMENTS OFFICE & CORR WALLS OFFICE WALLS STAIRS & OFFICE/PROD DIM WALL BATHROOMS SEE INSP NOTES DTD 2/21/91 SEE INSP NOTES DTD 2/21/91 SEE INSP NOTES DTD 2/21/91 SEE INSP NOTES DTD 2/21/91 SEE INSP NOTES DTD 2/21/91 WALLS & STAIRS 1 SIDE ELECT RM H20,WASTE & VENTS WALLS, OFFICE AREAS VENT,SYSTEMS DUCTS, PROD.AREA OFFICE WALLS INSIDE ELEV.SHAFT WALL 2ND FLR STL LEDGER NLNG PARKING LIGHT POLE PIERS NDS 18" MIN GR COVER/LITE PED 2ND FLOOR BN @ STL LEDGER NO PREVIOUS INSP OF FOOTINGS SEE COMMENTS 1/28/91 UPPER PART/HIGH WALLS UPPER PART OF HIGH WALLS FULL HGHT METAL STUDS SEE COMMENTS 1/14/91 REST OF COLUMN BASES SEE COMMENTS 1/11/91 COLUMN BASES EXCPT @ GRID D-7 SEE COMMENTS/1/9/91 COLUMN BASES LOADING DOCK SLAB RESET TO 1/7/91 ELEV PIT WALLS PERIMETER GROUT SLAB CLOSURE STRIP SLAB CLOSURE STRIPS LD'NG DOCK WALL FTNGS REST OF WALL PANELS SEE COMMENTS 12/14/90 CONC. COLUMNS SEE COMMENTS 12/07/90 UFER GRND NORTH & WEST PER FTNGS CONC. WALL PANELS CONC. WALL PANELS CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT# CB900566 FOR 05/02/91 INSPECTOR AREA MC DESCRIPTION: 1ST FLR OFF 9850, 2ND FL 10343 PLANCK# CB900566 TYPE: COM CONSTR. TYPE NEW 1ST FLR 44460 MFG & WHSE SPR GOLF CLUBS OCC GRP JOB ADDRESS: 1812 ASTON AV STR: FL: STE : ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION 120490 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 113090 Steel/Bond Beam 113090 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 112990 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 112890 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 112790 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 112690 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 112190 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 112090 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 111690 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 111590 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 111490 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 111390 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 110990 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 110890 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 110790 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 110690 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 103190 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 102690 Underground/Conduit-Wiring 102690 Underground/Under Floor ACT INSP NR MPC PA MPC PA MPC co MPC NR MP PA PD PA MPC CO MPC NR MPC PA MPC co MPC PI MPC PA PK PA PK PA MPC PA MPC NR MPC PA MPC AP MPC PA MPC COMMENTS GB @ GRID 4 & PANELS E-7&8, NlO&ll,S-3, 6 THRU 9 SEE COMMENTS 11/29/90 CAISSONS GRID D-7 D-8 F-7 F-8 SEE COMMENTS 11/21/90 CAISSONS GRID 8 (D-F) SEE COMMENTS 11/15/90 SLAB PREP SLAB & CAISSONS W/SP. INSP. STOREFRONT FOOTINGS 2 F-15 & 1 F-5 U.G.FEEDERS TO SUB-PANELS INTERIOR PIERS & ELEV PITS SEE COMMENTS 10/26/90 UNSCHEDULED INSPECTION DATE 547 /7/ PERMIT # JOB ADDRESS /&?I2 M7dJ 'G7. ARRIVE : TIME LEAVE: LVL DESCRIPTION ACT COMMENTS - - 7'v 2J7%&,/pCc . up7 r E Z JOB ADDRESS ///a TIME CD * ARFZI LVL VE : TIME LEAVE: DESCRIPTION ACT COMMENTS & - - - - c P 81 i 1 25, 1991 Rick Amison 8 .gelectric Corp. Escondido CA 92029 :5J Opper Stroet Dear R.' I,, Thts Im'ter is to inform you that type tlC cable will be allowed on this c .ject in areas where acceptable to the City and the NEC, Therr . 's should be used only where not subject to physical nag e If YOU I ..d any questions, please call. Sincerely, Keith N. Kruse Lfrc lrl .. i _I CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST DESCRIPTION: 1ST FLR OFF 9850, 2ND FL 10343 PERNIT# CB900566 FOR 04/26/91 INSPECTOR AREA MC PLANCK# CB900566 OCC GRP TYPE: COM CONSTR. TYPE NEW 1ST FLR 44460 MFG & WHSE SPR GOLF CLUBS JOB ADDRESS: 1812 ASTON AV APPLICANT : CHAP0 , GENE OWNER: CONTRACTOR: PHONE : STR: FL: STE : PHONE: 481-7446 COBRA-BLACKMORE PARTNERS PHONE: 756-1139 REMARKS: MH/TOM/980-1702 SPECIAL INSTRUCT: TOTAL TIME: --RELATED PERMITS-- PERMIT# TYPE STATUS ISSUED RW900068 SE900140 SWOW ISSUED CB910551 SIGN ISSUED ~ ~~~ CD LVL DESCRIPTION ACT COMMENTS 44 ME Roush/Ducts/DamDers Go YL"LPY ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** 042491 042391 042391 042291 041991 041991 041691 040991 041191 040891 040591 032791 032591 031991 031991 031591 031591 031391 030791 030191 030191 030191 030191 022691 022691 022691 022691 DATE DESCRIPTION ACT INSP Interior Lath/Drywall COMMENTS PA MPC Interior Lath/Drywall NR MPC NEW OFFICES/REV. PLN NEW OFFICES Insulation Insulation Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Rough Combo Insulation Rough Combo Rough Combo Rough Combo Rough Combo Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Compliance Investigation Insulation Insulation Rough Electric Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Interior Lath/Drywall Interior Lath/Drywall Interior Lath/Drywall Rough Electric Rough Electric Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Rough Electric Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Rough/Ducts/Dampers Interior Lath/Drywall PA co AP AP PA NR NS co AP AP NR co PA co PI PA co PA co co co PA PA PA PA MPC MPC MPC MPC PK PK PK PK PK TP PK MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC NDS STAIRWAY WALL INSUL NDS R-19 @ NEW OFFICES NEW RMS REV. PLANS CEILING 1ST FLOOR 2ND FLR, FIRE SAFING 1ST FLOOR METAL HNDRL ATCHD @ ENTRY STR 2ND FLOOR CEILING CHECK-UP ONLY ND FIRESAFING/ZND FLR STRFRNT 1ST FLR STRFRNT WALLS SEE COMMENTS 3/15/91 SEE COMMENTS 3/15/91 SEE COMMENTS 3/8/91 2ND FLR OFFICE & CORR WALLS SEE COMMENTS 3/1/91 SEE COMMENTS 3/1/91 OFFICE & CORR WALLS OFFICE WALLS BATHROOMS STAIRS & OFFICE/PROD DIM WALL / CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REOUEST 1 PERMIT# CB900566 FOR 03/01/91 INSPECTOR AREA MC DESCRIPTION: 1ST FLR OFF 9850, 2ND FL 10343 TYPE: COM APPLICANT: CHAPO, GENE OWNER: COBRA-BLACKMORE PARTNERS PHONE: 756-1139 1ST FLR 44460 MFG & WHSE SPR GOLF CLUBS PLANCK# CB900566 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE NEW JOB ADDRESS: 1812 ASTON AV STR: FL: STE : CONTRACTOR: PHONE: 481-7446 PHONE : REMARKS: MH/TOM/931-1676 SPECIAL INSTRUCT: TOTAL TIME: --RELATED PERMITS" PERMIT# TYPE STATUS RW900068 ROW ISSUED SE900140 SWOW ISSUED CD LVL DESCRIPTION ACT COMMENTS ST Interior Lath/Drywall - - - DATE 022691 022691 022691 022691 022191 022191 022191 022191 022191 022091 021991 021991 021991 021991 021491 021491 020491 020191 020191 013191 012991 012891 012591 012391 011891 011491 011191 011091 ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DESCRIPTION Rough Electric Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Rough/Ducts/Dampers Interior Lath/Drywall Ftg/Foundation/Piers Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldinq Rouqh/Topout Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldinq Rough Electric Interior Lathprywall Rough/Topout Frame/Steel/Boltinq/Welding Rough Electric Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldinq Interior Lath/Drywall Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Ftg/Foundation/Piers Underground/Conduit-Wiring Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Steel/Bond Beam Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Interior Lath/Drywall Interior Lath/Drywall Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Frame/Steel/Boltinq/Welding Roof/Reroof Ftg/Foundation/Piers Rough/Ducts/Dampers ACT PA PA PA PA co co co co co PA PI PI PA PA PI PA AP PA PA PA AP PA PA PA co PA AP co MPC INSP MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC COMMENTS OFFICE & CORR WALLS OFFICE WALLS BATHROOMS STAIRS & OFFICE/PROD DIM WALL SEE INSP NOTES DTD 2/21/91 SEE INSP NOTES DTD 2/21/91 SEE INSP NOTES DTD 2/21/91 SEE INSP NOTES DTD 2/21/91 SEE INSP NOTES DTD 2/21/91 WALLS & STAIRS 1 SIDE ELECT RM H20,WASTE & VENTS WALLS, OFFICE AREAS VENT,SYSTEMS DUCTS, PROD.AREA OFFICE WALLS INSIDE ELEV.SHAFT WALL 2ND FLR STL LEDGER NLNG PARKING LIGHT POLE PIERS NDS 18" MIN GR COVER/LITE PED 2ND FLOOR BN @ STL LEDGER NO PREVIOUS INSP OF FOOTINGS SEE COMMENTS 1/28/91 UPPER PART/HIGH WALLS UPPER PART OF HIGH WALLS SEE COMMENTS 1/14/91 FULL HGHT METAL STUDS REST OF COLUMN BASES SEE COMMENTS 1/11/91 c ,fl c INSPECTION REQUEST CITY OF CARLSBAD PERMIT# CB900566 DESCRIPTION: 1ST FLR OFF 9850, 2ND FL 10343 TYPE: COM CONSTR. TYPE NEW FOR 02/21/91 INSPECTOR AREA MC 1ST FLR 44460 MFG & WHSE SPR GOLF CLUBS OCC GRP PLANCK# CB900566 JOB ADDRESS : 1812 ASTON AV STR: FL: APPLICANT: CHAPO, GENE STE : PHONE: 481-7446 CONTRACTOR: PHONE : OWNER: COBRA-BLACKMORE PARTNERS PHONE: 756-1139 REMARKS: MH/TOM/931-1676 SPECIAL INSTRUCT: TOTAL TIME: --RELATED PERMITS-- PERMIT# TYPE STATUS RW900068 ROW ISSUED SE900140 SWOW ISSUED CD LVL DESCRIPTION ACT COMMENTS 11 ST Ftg/Foundation/Piers e 24 PL Rough/Topout 14 ST Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 34 EL Rough Electric " " ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION ACT INSP COMMENTS 021991 021991 021991 021991 021491 021491 020491 020191 020191 013191 012991 012891 012591 012391 011891 011491 011191 011091 010991 010991 010891 010791 010791 010491 122690 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Rough/Topout Rough Electric Rough/Ducts/Dampers Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Interior Lath/Drywall Underground/Conduit-Wiring Ftg/Foundation/Piers Steel/Bond Beam Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Interior Lath/Drywall Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Interior Lath/Drywall Roof/Reroof Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Steel/Bond Beam Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Steel/Bond Beam Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers PI MPC PI MPC PA MPC PA MPC PI MPC AP MPC PA MPC PA MPC PA MPC AP MPC PA MPC PA MPC PA MPC PA MPC PA MPC co MPC co MPC AP MPC PA MPC PA MPC PA MPC PA MPC PA MPC CA PC PI MPC WALLS & STAIRS H20,WASTE & VENTS WALLS, OFFICE AREAS VENT,SYSTEMS DUCTS, PROD.AREA OFFICE WALLS INSIDE ELEV.SHAFT WALL PARKING LIGHT POLE PIERS 2ND FLR STL LEDGER NLNG NDS 18" MIN GR COVER/LITE PED NO PREVIOUS INSP OF FOOTINGS 2ND FLOOR BN @ STL LEDGER UPPER PART/HIGH WALLS SEE COMMENTS 1/28/91 UPPER PART OF HIGH WALLS FULL HGHT METAL STUDS SEE COMMENTS 1/14/91 SEE COMMENTS 1/11/91 REST OF COLUMN BASES COLUMN BASES EXCPT @ GRID D-7 SEE COMMENTS/1/9/91 COLUMN BASES ELEV PIT WALLS LOADING DOCK SLAB RESET TO 1/7/91 PERIMETER GROUT , CITY OF CARLSBAD PERMIT# CB900566 INSPECTION REQUEST DESCRIPTION: 1ST FLR OFF 9850, 2ND FL 10343 TYPE: COM JOB ADDRESS: 1812 ASTON AV CONTRACTOR: OWNER: COBRA-BLACKMORE PARTNERS FOR 01/28/91 INSPECTOR AREA MC 1ST FLR 44460 MFG & WHSE SPR GOLF CLUBS PLANCK# CB900566 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE NEW APPLICANT : CHAP0 , GENE STR: FL: STE : PHONE: 481-7446 PHONE: 756-1139 PHONE : REMARKS: MH/MIKE/980-1702 INSPECTOR SPECIAL INSTRUCT: HE ASKED FOR MEZZANINE NAILING TOTAL TIME: --RELATED PERMITS-- PERMIT# TYPE STATUS RW900068 ROW SE900140 SWOW ISSUED ISSUED CD LVL DESCRIPTION ACT COMMENTS 15 soor/Kerobf e 18 ST Exterior Lath/Drywall &- " " ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION 012391 Interior Lath/Drywall 011891 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 011491 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 011191 Roof/Reroof 011091 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 010991 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 010991 Steel/Bond Beam 010891 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 010791 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 010791 Steel/Bond Beam 010491 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 122690 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 122190 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 122090 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 121990 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 121490 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 121290 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 121290 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 121090 Steel/Bond Beam 120790 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 120790 Underground/Conduit-Wiring 120690 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 120690 Steel/Bond Beam 120690 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 120590 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 120490 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 113090 Steel/Bond Beam ACT INSP PA MPC PA MPC co MPC co MPC AP MPC PA MPC PA MPC PA MPC PA MPC PA MPC CA PC PI MPC PA MPC PA MPC co MPC PA MPC PA MPC PA MPC NR MPC PA MPC AP MPC PA MPC PA MPC PA MPC NR MPC NR MPC PA MPC COMMENTS UPPER PART OF HIGH WALLS FULL HGHT METAL STUDS SEE COMMENTS 1/14/91 SEE COMMENTS 1/11/91 REST OF COLUMN BASES COLUMN BASES EXCPT @ GRID D-7 SEE COMMENTS/1/9/91 COLUMN BASES ELEV PIT WALLS LOADING DOCK SLAB RESET TO 1/7/91 PERIMETER GROUT SLAB CLOSURE STRIP SLAB CLOSURE STRIPS LD'NG DOCK WALL FTNGS SEE COMMENTS 12/14/90 REST OF WALL PANELS CONC. COLUMNS UFER GRND SEE COMMENTS 12/07/90 NORTH & WEST PER FTNGS CONC. WALL PANELS CONC. WALL PANELS GB @ GRID 4 & PANELS CITY OF CARLSBAD PERMIT# CB900566 INSPECTION REQUEST DESCRIPTION: 1ST FLR OFF 9850, 2ND FL 10343 TYPE: COM JOB ADDRESS: 1812 ASTON AV APPLICANT: CHAPO, GENE CONTRACTOR: OWNER : COBRA-BLACKMORE PARTNERS PHONE: 756-1139 FOR 01/14/91 INSPECTOR AREA MC PLANCK# CB900566 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE NEW 1ST FLR 44460 MFG & WHSE SPR GOLF CLUBS STR: FL: STE : PHONE: 481-7446 PHONE : REMARKS: MH/MIKE/980-1702 SPECIAL INSTRUCT: INSPECTOR + I TOTAL TIME : --RELATED PERMITS-- PERMIT# TYPE STATUS RW900068 ISSUED SE900140 SWOW ISSUED CD LVL DESCRIPTION ACT COMMENTS ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION 011091 010991 010991 010891 010791 010791 010491 122690 122190 122090 121990 121490 121290 121290 121090 120790 120790 120690 120690 120690 120590 120490 113090 113090 112990 112890 112790 112690 Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Steel/Bond Beam Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Steel/Bond Beam Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Steel/Bond Beam Underground/Conduit-Wiring Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Steel/Bond Beam Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Ftg/Foundation/Piers Steel/Bond Beam Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers ACT AP PA PA PA PA PA CA PI PA PA PA co PA PA NR PA AP PA PA PA NR NR PA PA co PA NR PA INSP MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC PC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC PD MP MPC COMMENTS REST OF COLUMN BASES COLUMN BASES EXCPT @ GRID D-7 SEE COMMENTS/1/9/91 COLUMN BASES LOADING DOCK SLAB ELEV PIT WALLS RESET TO 1/7/91 PERIMETER GROUT SLAB CLOSURE STRIP SLAB CLOSURE STRIPS LD'NG DOCK WALL FTNGS SEE COMMENTS 12/14/90 REST OF WALL PANELS CONC. COLUMNS UFER GRND SEE COMMENTS 12/07/90 NORTH & WEST PER FTNGS CONC. WALL PANELS CONC. WALL PANELS GB @ GRID 4 & PANELS E-7&8, NlO&ll,S-3, 6 THRU 9 SEE COMMENTS 11/29/90 CAISSONS GRID D-7 D-8 F-7 F-8 . :' CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST I PERMIT# CB900566 FOR 01/11/91 DESCRIPTION: 1ST FLR OFF 9850, 2ND FL 10343 INSPECTOR AREA MC PLANCK# CB900566 JOB ADDRESS: 1812 ASTON AV TYPE: COM CONSTR. TYPE NEW APPLICANT: CHAPO, GENE PHONE: 481-7446 CONTRACTOR: OWNER : COBRA-BLACKMORE PARTNERS 1ST FLR 44460 MFG & WHSE SPR GOLF CLUBS OCC GRP STR: FL: STE : PHONE : PHONE: 756-1139 REMARKS: MH/TOM/980-1702 SPECIAL INSTRUCT: INSPECTOR F TOTAL TIME : --RELATED PERMITS" PERMIT# TYPE STATUS RW900068 SE900140 SWOW ISSUED ISSUED CD LVL DESCRIPTION ACT COMMENTS 15 ST Roof/Reroof " +e " " -1 ***** INSPECTION DATE DESCRIPTION 010991 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 010991 010891 010791 010791 010491 122690 122190 122090 121990 121490 121290 121290 121090 120790 120790 120690 120690 120690 120490 120590 113090 113090 112990 112890 112790 112690 112190 Steel/Bond Beam Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Steel/Bond Beam Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Steel/Bond Beam Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Ftg/Foundation/Piers Underground/Conduit-Wiring Ftg/Foundation/Piers Steel/Bond Beam Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Ftg/Foundation/Piers Steel/Bond Beam Ftg/Foundation/Piers Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers ACT INSP PA MPC PA MPC PA MPC PA MPC PA MPC CA PC PI MPC PA MPC PA MPC PA MPC CO MPC PA MPC NR MPC PA MPC AP MPC PA MPC PA MPC PA MPC PA MPC NR MPC NR MPC PA MPC PA MPC co MPC NR MP PA PD co MPC PA MPC * COMMENTS COLUMN BASES EXCPT @ GRID D-7 SEE COMMENTS/1/9/91 COLUMN BASES LOADING DOCK SLAB ELEV PIT WALLS RESET TO 1/7/91 PERIMETER GROUT SLAB CLOSURE STRIP SLAB CLOSURE STRIPS LD'NG DOCK WALL FTNGS SEE COMMENTS 12/14/90 REST OF WALL PANELS CONC. COLUMNS SEE COMMENTS 12/07/90 UFER GRND NORTH & WEST PER FTNGS CONC. WALL PANELS CONC. WALL PANELS GB @ GRID 4 & PANELS E-7&8, NlO&ll,S-3, 6 THRU 9 SEE COMMENTS 11/29/90 CAISSONS GRID D-7 D-8 F-7 F-8 SEE COMMENTS 11/ 2 1/ 9 0 . CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT# CB900566 FOR 01/09/91 DESCRIPTION: 1ST FLR OFF 9850, 2ND FL 10343 INSPECTOR AREA MC PLANCK# CB900566 1ST FLR 44460 MFG h WHSE SPR GOLF CLUBS OCC GRP TYPE: COM APPLICANT : CHAP0 , GENE JOB ADDRESS: 1812 ASTON OWNER : CONTRACTOR: COBRA-BLACKMORE REMARKS: MH/MIKE/980-1702 SPECIAL INSTRUCT: AV CONSTR. TYPE NEW STR: FL: STE : PHONE: 481-7446 PARTNERS PHONE: 756-1139 PHONE : INSPECTOR + TOTAL TIME: --RELATED PERMITS-- PERMIT# TYPE RW900068 ROW STATUS ISSUED SE900140 SWOW ISSUED CD LVL DESCRIPTION ACT COMMENTS 11 ST Ftg/Foundation/Piers &- " &&a. NDJ ex- 70 ____ Arm o= FTMi * DATE 010791 010791 010491 122690 122190 122090 121490 121990 121290 121290 121090 120790 120790 120690 120690 120690 120590 120490 113090 113090 112990 112890 112790 112690 112190 112090 111690 111590 ***** INSPECTION HISTORY DESCRIPTION Ftg/Foundation/Piers Steel/Bond Beam Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Steel/Bond Beam Ftg/Foundation/Piers Underground/Conduit-Wiring Ftg/Foundation/Piers Steel/Bond Beam Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Steel/Bond Beam Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers ACT INSP PA MPC PA MPC CA PC PI MPC PA MPC PA MPC CO MPC PA MPC PA MPC PA MPC NR MPC PA MPC AP MPC PA MPC PA MPC PA MPC NR MPC NR MPC PA MPC PA MPC co MPC PA PD NR MP PA MPC co MPC PA MPC NR MPC co MPC ***** COMMENTS LOADING DOCK SLAB RESET TO 1/7/91 ELEV PIT WALLS PERIMETER GROUT SLAB CLOSURE STRIP SLAB CLOSURE STRIPS LD'NG DOCK WALL FTNGS REST OF WALL PANELS SEE COMMENTS 12/14/90 CONC. COLUMNS UFER GRND SEE COMMENTS 12/07/90 NORTH h WEST PER FTNGS CONC. WALL PANELS CONC. WALL PANELS GB @ GRID 4 & PANELS E-7h8, NlO&ll,S-3, 6 THRU 9 SEE COMMENTS 11/29/90 CAISSONS GRID D-7 D-0 SEE COMMENTS 11/21/90 CAISSONS GRID 8(D-F) SEE COMMENTS 11/15/90 F-7 F-8 INSPECTION REQUEST CITY OF CARLSBAD PERMIT# CB900566 FOR 12/14/90 INSPECTOR AREA MC DESCRIPTION: 1ST FLR OFF 9850, 2ND FL 10343 PLANCK# CB900566 TYPE: COM CONSTR. TYPE NEW JOB ADDRESS: 1812 ASTON AV APPLICANT : CHAP0 , GENE CONTRACTOR: PHONE : OWNER: COBRA-BLACKMORE PARTNERS PHONE: 756-1139 n 1ST FLR 44460 MFG & WHSE SPR GOLF CLUBS OCC GRP STR: FL: STE : PHONE: 481-7446 REMARKS: MH/980-1702 SPECIAL INSTRUCT: INSPECTOR TOTAL TIME : --RELATED PERMITS" PERMIT# TYPE STATUS ISSUED RW900068 SE900140 SWOW ISSUED CD LVL DESCRIPTION ACT COMMENTS 11 ST Ftg/Foundation/Piers LC2 " " " ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE 121290 121290 121090 120790 120790 120690 120690 120690 120590 120490 113090 113090 112990 112890 112790 112690 112190 112090 111690 111590 111490 111390 110990 110890 110790 110690 103190 102690 DESCRIPTION Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Steel/Bond Beam Ftg/Foundation/Piers Underground/Conduit-Wiring Ftg/Foundation/Piers Steel/Bond Beam Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Steel/Bond Beam Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Underground/Under Floor Ftg/Foundation/Piers ACT INSP PA MPC PA MPC NR MPC PA MPC AP MPC PA MPC PA MPC PA MPC NR MPC NR MPC PA MPC PA MPC CO MPC PA PD NR MP PA MPC CO MPC PA MPC NR MPC CO MPC PI MPC PA PK PA PK PA MPC NR MPC PA MPC AP MPC PA MPC COMMENTS REST OF WALL PANELS CONC. COLUMNS UFER GRND SEE COMMENTS 12/07/90 NORTH & WEST PER FTNGS CONC. WALL PANELS CONC. WALL PANELS GB @ GRID 4 & PANELS E-7&8, NlO&ll,S-3, 6 THRU 9 SEE COMMENTS 11/29/90 CAISSONS GRID D-7 D-8 F-7 F-8 SEE COMMENTS 11/21/90 CAISSONS GRID 8 (D-F) SEE COMMENTS 11/15/90 SLAB PREP SLAB & CAISSONS W/SP. INSP. STOREFRONT FOOTINGS 2 F-15 & 1 F-5 INTERIOR PIERS & ELEV PITS SEE COMMENTS 10/26/90 CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST J I' PERMIT# CB900566 FOR 12/07/90 DESCRIPTION: 1ST FLR OFF 9850, 2ND FL 10343 JOB ADDRESS: 1812 ASTON AV TYPE: COM CONSTR. TYPE NEW APPLICANT : CHAP0 , GENE OWNER : CONTRACTOR: PHONE : INSPECTOR AREA MC PLANCK# CB900566 1ST FLR 44460 MFG & WHSE SPR GOLF CLUBS OCC GRP STR: FL: STE : PHONE: 401-7446 COBRA-BLACKMORE PARTNERS PHONE: 756-1139 REMARKS: RS/980-1702 SPECIAL INSTRUCT: INSPECTOR + TOTAL TIME: --RELATED PERMITS-- PERMIT# TYPE STATUS RW900068 ISSUED SE900140 SWOW ISSUED CD LVL DESCRIPTION ACT COMMENTS 11 ST Ftg/Foundation/Piers e4 .qE= E? ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION 120590 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 120490 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 113090 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 113090 Steel/Bond Beam 112990 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 112890 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 112790 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 112690 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 112190 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 112090 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 111690 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 111590 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 111490 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 111390 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 110990 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 110890 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 110790 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 110690 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 103190 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 102690 Underground/Under Floor ACT NR NR PA PA co PA NR PA co PA NR co PI PA PA PA NR PA AP PA MPC INSP MPC MPC MPC MP PD MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC MPC PK MPC PK MPC MPC MPC MPC MPc COMMENTS GB @ GRID 4 & PANELS E-7&8, N10&ll,S-3, 6 THRU 9 SEE COMMENTS 11/29/90 CAISSONS GRID D-7 D-8 F-7 F-8 SEE COMMENTS 11/21/90 CAISSONS GRID 8 (D-F) SEE COMMENTS 11/15/90 SLAB PREP SLAB & CAISSONS W/SP. INSP. STOREFRONT FOOTINGS 2 F-15 & 1 F-5 INTERIOR PIERS & ELEV PITS SEE COMMENTS 10/26/90 CITY OF CARLSBAD PERMIT# CB900566 INSPECTION REQUEST FOR 11/29/90 DESCRIPTION: 1ST FLR OFF 9850, 2ND FL 10343 TYPE: COM JOB ADDRESS: 1812 ASTON AV APPLICANT : CHAP0 , GENE OWNER: CONTRACTOR: PLANCK# CB900566 INSPECTOR AREA MC OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE NEW 1ST FLR 44460 MFG & WHSE SPR GOLF CLUBS STR: FL: STE : PHONE: 481-7446 PHONE: 756-1139 COBRA-BUCKMORE PARTNERS PHONE : REMARKS: MH/MIKE/980-1702 SPECIAL INSTRUCT: TOTAL TIME: --RELATED PERMITS" PERMIT# TYPE STATUS RW900068 ISSUED SE900140 SWOW ISSUED CD LVL DESCRIPTION ACT COMMENTS 11 ST Ftg/Foundation/Piers - CO G//Q --, /fip&!! " p-7- CY= l=.wd% " -, " DATE 112790 112690 112190 112090 111690 111590 111490 111390 110990 110890 110790 110690 103190 102690 ***** INSPECTION HISTORY DESCRIPTION Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Underground/Under Floor Ftg/Foundation/Piers ACT INSP NR MP PA MPC CO MPC PA MPC NR MPC co MPC PI MPC PA PK PA PK PA MPC NR MPC PA MPC AP MPC PA MPC ***** COMMENTS CAISSONS GRID D-7 D-8 F-7 F-8 SEE COMMENTS 11/21/90 CAISSONS GRID 8 (D-F) SEE COMMENTS 11/15/90 SLAB PREP SLAB & CAISSONS W/SP. INSP. STOREFRONT FOOTINGS 2 F-15 & 1 F-5 INTERIOR PIERS & ELEV PITS SEE COMMENTS 10/26/90 CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST FOR 11/21/90 PERMIT# CB900566 DESCRIPTION: 1ST FLR OFF 9850, 2ND FL 10343 PLANCK# CB900566 INSPECTOR AREA MC OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE NEW 1ST FLR 44460 MFG & WHSE SPR GOLF CLUBS TYPE: COM APPLICANT : CHAP0 , GENE PHONE: 481-7446 CONTRACTOR: PHONE : OWNER: COBRA-BLACKMORE PARTNERS PHONE: 756-1139 JOB ADDRESS: 1812 ASTON AV STR: FL: STE : REMARKS: MH/MIKE/980-1702 SPECIAL INSTRUCT: INSPECTOR & TOTAL TIME : "RELATED PERMITS" PERMIT# TYPE STATUS RW900068 ROW ISSUED SE900140 SWOW ISSUED CD LVL DESCRIPTION ACT COMMENTS " " ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE 111690 111590 111490 111390 110890 110790 110690 103190 102690 DESCRIPTION Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Underground/Under Floor ACT NR co PA PI PA PA NR PA AP INSP MPC COMMENTS MPC MPC SEE COMMENTS 11/15/90 MPC PK SLAB PREP STOREFRONT FOOTINGS MPC 2 F-15 & 1 F-5 MPC MPC MPC INTERIOR PIERS & ELEV PITS SEE COMMENTS 10/26/90 CITY OF CARLSBAD PERMIT# CB900566 DESCRIPTION: 1ST FLR OFF 9850, 2ND FL 10343 INSPECTION REQUEST FOR 11/15/90 INSPECTOR AREA MC PLANCK# CB900566 CONSTR. TYPE NEW TYPE: COM JOB ADDRESS: 1812 ASTON AV APPLICANT : CHAP0 , GENE CONTRACTOR: OWNER : COBRA-BLACKMORE PARTNERS 1ST FLR 44460 MFG & WHSE SPR GOLF CLUBS OCC GRP STR: FL: STE : PHONE: 481-7446 PHONE: 756-1139 PHONE : REMARKS: MH/MIKE/980-1702 SPECIAL INSTRUCT: INSPECTOR + ! TOTAL TIME: --RELATED PERMITS-- PERMIT# TYPE RW900068 STATUS SE900140 SWOW ISSUED ISSUED CD LVL DESCRIPTION ACT COMMENTS 11 ST Ftg/Foundation/Piers & W4Q BB+u a &,dB $. u.& &Kr A" Shtlp'f -2 &wJ G-237tT c s'/!J " " " ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION 111390 Ftg/Foundation/Piers ACT INSP COMMENTS PA PK 110890 Ftg/Foundation/Piers SLAB PREP 110790 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PA MPC PA MPC STOREFRONT FOOTINGS 110690 Ftg/Foundation/Piers NR MPC 2 F-15 & 1 F-5 103190 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PA MPC 102690 Underground/Under Floor AP MPC SEE COMMENTS 10/26/90 INTERIOR PIERS & ELEV PITS PERMIT# CB900566 INSPECTION REQUEST CITY OF CARLSBAD FOR 10/26/90 INSPECTOR AREA DESCRIPTION: 1ST FLR OFF 9850, 2ND FL 10343 1ST FLR 44460 MFG & WHSE SPR GOLF CLUBS PLANCK# CB900566 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE NEW TYPE: COM JOB ADDRESS: 1812 ASTON AV CONTRACTOR: OWNER: COBRA-BLACKMORE PARTNERS APPLICANT : CHAP0 , GENE PHONE: 481-7446 PHONE: 756-1139 STR: FL: STE : PHONE : REMARKS: Tl/MH/GENE/481-7446 SPECIAL INSTRUCT: TOTAL TIME: --RELATED PERMITS-- PERMIT# TYPE STATUS RW900068 ISSUED ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION ACT INSP COMMENTS Wyman Testing Laboratories 13230 EVENING CREEK DRIVE SOUTH, SUITE 21 8 SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92128 (619) 486-0354 COVERING WORK PERFORMED OREINFORCEDCONCRETE OSTRUCT.STEEL ASSEMBLY WHIC~I REQUIRED APPROVAL BY UPRESTRESSED CONCRETE OREINFORCED GYPSUM OGLUE.LAM.FABRICATION ~ ~ ~~~ THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF OREINFORCED MASONRY DPlLE DRIVING OOTHER 108 ADDRESS 1812 Aston Carlsbad Steel Equipment enclosure Cobra Golf 19 9 ENDING 7-12 No. 90-292 FOR WEEK OWNER OR PROJECT NAME BLDG. PERMIT NO. PLAN FILE NO. CONSTR. MAT'L ITYPE.GRADL ETC.) 91-621 ARCHITECT DESIGN STRENGTH SOURCE OR MFGR. ENGbNEER Gene Chapo & Associates Arthur Serata & Associates MQ Constructlon 3ESCR1BE MAT'L. (MIX DESIGN RE-BAR GRADE MF6R.l ASTM A36 ASTM AS00 Grade B Electrodes E7018 GENLRALCONTRACTO@ CONTR. DOING REPORTED WORK LAW RECEIVING e TESTING CONETR. MITL SAMPLES Wyman Testlng Laboratory WELDING INSPECTION 7-12 Visually inspected the fillet welding of tube steel framing erection connections in the following locations: between D and C at 1 line outside at northwest end. Performed visual inspection of previously welded steel framing between D and C at 1 line. The framing will be enclosed welding was done by fabricated shop. Field welding consisted of by aluminum louvers and will house mechanical equipment. Most welding conforms with approved drawings. base plate, wall attachment, and corner attachment. All field Certified welders were observed for proper welding procedures and techniques. Completed welds were inspected for size, length, location, and unless otherwise noted are free of visible defects and in accordance with the approved drawings, AWS D1.1, and the UBC. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE REPORTED WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUNDTHIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS SPECIFICATIONS,& 7 - APPLICABLESECTIONS OF THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO BUILDING LAWS. Iqf ON TURE OF REGISTERED INSC CTOR 41963 DlTE OF REPORT REGISTER NUMBER 13230 EVENING CREEK DRIVE SOUTH, SUITE 218 ! SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92128 (61 9) 486-0354 ROOFING INSPECTION 4-3 Weather: Sunny, Dry Crew: 1 Foreman, 2 Roof Mechanics Kettle 500° Observations: On arrival, roofers are preparing to roof in all on lower deck, roofers are installing basesheet prior to ply felt flashings for T.I. work. Also, at the northwest end of building to be well saturated in hot asphalt. All flashings are being application. Ply felt application commences, ply felts appear stripped in per project specifications. Work oserved today complies with good roofing practice. - n . I I, 1 CERTIFICATION OFCOMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTE0 I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVE0 PLANS SPECIFICATIONS,& APPLICABLESECTIONS OF THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO BUILDING LAWS. I WELDING INSPECTION 3-27 plate reinforcing hanger connections in the following locations: Visually inspected the fillet welding of joist to beam bent line H.6 to G.3 at S.2 top 5.6 at office ceiling level. Certified welders were observed for proper welding procedures and techniques. Completed welds were inspected for size, length, location, and unless otherwise noted are free of visible defects and in accordance with the engineers field revision 5X and sheet 11 of plans. Wyman 13230 EVENING CREEK DRIVE SOUTH, SUITE 218 Testing SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92128 Laboratories (61 9) 486-0354 - COVERING WORK PERFORMED OREINFORCED CONCRETE DSTRUCT. STEEL ASSEMBLY WHICH REQUIRED APPROVAL BY OPRE-STRESSEDCONCRETE OREINFORCED GYPSUM OGLUE.LAM.FABRICATION THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF OREINFORCED MASONRY UPlLE DRIVING OOTHER - - - - - - - - - CERTIFICATION OFCOMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS SPECIFICATIONS,& APPLICABLESECTIONS OF THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO BUILDING LAWS. DATE OF REPORT - SIGNATOR* OF R#ISTE~~ I SPLCTOR 3- 27- cif J3@ RCOlSTER NUMBER IC :ix Design # 355 LAO HECElVlNG &.TESTING CONSTR. MAT'L SAMPLES Wyman Testing Laboratory CONCRETE INSPECTION 3-3.5 yards of concrete, mix design # 355 in the following locations: Inspected the placement and consolidation of 11.5 cubic cast in place wall at lines X thru H from 5 thru 4. One set of 4 test cylinders taken from cast in place wall at lines 5 at K. Slump test results 5". Concrete supplied by Escondido Ready Mix. Ticket # 216830, truck # 525. project specifications and the UBC. Work inspected is in accordance with the approved plans, " ~ ~ .... ~~ ~ - .~ ~ ~~ ~~ . ~ ~~ -. .- 3-6 WELDING INSPECTION sti.ffener clips to W14 beam connections in the following Visually inspected the fillet welding of bent plate and locations: F.5 - I1 at 5-5.75 (diagonal line). Visually inspected the fillet welding of wall angle for metal deck connections in the following locations: panels N3 6, W6. procedures and techniques. Certified welders were observed for proper welding and unless otherwise noted are free of visible defects and in Completed welds were inspected for size, length, location, accordance with the approved plans. .""" CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I tw1kw CFHTIFY rl1P.l I HAVE INsPt(:-lt~) ~1.1. OF THE ABOVE REP'OH~rED WOHK. 1lNLt:SS OTHEHWISt NiJIEII I IHAVE FOUNII 1111s WOWK 1.0 COMPLY WIl~tl IHE APPROVED PLANS SPECIFICATIONS, & APPLICABLESECTIONS OF THE CITY OF SAN DlEGO BUILDING LAWS. WELDING INSPECTION 3-5 stiffener clips to wlH/W14 beam connections in t-he following Visllally inspected the fillet welding of 3/8" bent plate and locations: F.5-H at 5-5.75 (diagonal line). Visually inspected the fillet welding of 16 gauge lnet.al stud top tack to beam (W/18) connecti.ons in the following locations: F.5-F at 5.75-6 (di.agona1 line). procedures and techni.ques. Certified welders were observed for proper welding and unless otherwise noted are free of visible defects and in Completed welds were inspected for size, length, l.ocation, accordance with the approved plans. 3-7 CONCRETE INSPECTION wall per details noted on sheet S-10 of approved drawings. and clearances. Inspected the reinforcing steel installation for retaining Inspected reinforcing steel for size, grade, lap, locations, Verified member dimensions with inplace formwork. Verified dimensions of excavated locations. Checked locations of embedded items and sleeves. Inspected the placement and consolidation of 12 cubic yards of concrete, mix design # 355 in the following locations: along restroom wall, east side. Slump test results 3 112". One set of 4 test cylinders taken from center of wall. truck # 528. Concrete supplied by Escondido Ready Mix. Ticket # 216589, Work inspected is in accordance with the approved plans. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WHICH REOUIREO APPROVAL BY OPRE-STRESSED CONCRETE OREINFORCED GYPSUM UGLUE-LAM.FABRICATION THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF OREINFORCED MASONRY UPILE DRIVING ClOTHER [FO" WEEK and clearances. Inspected reinforcing steel for size, grade, lap, locations, Verified member dimensions with inplace formwork. Verified dimensions of excavated locations. Checked locations of embedded items and sleeves. Inspected the placement and consolidation of 10.5 cubic yards of concrete, mix design # 5412451 in the following locations: as noted above. One set of 4 test cylinders taken from footing 3 at J. Slump test results 4 3/4. Concrete supplied by Escondido Ready Mix. Ticket # 1292599, Work inspected is in accordance with the approved plans and truck #540. specifications per the UBC. 2-21 Inspected the reinforcing steel installation for terrace wall footing per details noted on sheet A-17 of approved drawinqs. Wyman 13230 EVENING CtiEE:l< DRIVE SOUlW. SUITE 2113 I ,"\ I . .~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~. . ~~ ~~ ~~~~ ~ . .~~ ~~ WELDING INSPECTION 2-18 Visually inspected the fillet welding of struts and sti-ffener plates both sides of beam connections in the following locations: radius between lines F - H at 6 - 7.3. procedures and techniques. Certified welders were observed for proper welding and unless otherwise noted are free of visible defects and in Completed welds were inspected for size, length, location, accordance with the approved plans and specifications. :I/' 1:1/11 ~ ,' I. :, !, ., Wyman 13230 EVENING CREEK DRIVE SOUTH, SUITE 218 Testing SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92128 Laboratories (619) 486-0354 COVEKING WORK PEHFORMEO [ SHEINFORCEDCONCRETE OSTRUCT. STEEL ASSEMBL.Y WHICH HEOUIREO AWHOVAL BY I IPRE-STRESSED CONCRETE nRElNFORCE0 GYPSUM ~~GLUE.L.AM.FABRICATlON I ~TtlE SPECIAL INSPtl:.IOH OF 1 IREINFORCED MASONRY UPlLE DRIVING UOTHER ,,, A,'r,rll.>s 1812 Aston :obra Golf PO" WEEN No. 90-292 ENDING 2-15 WNER OH PROJECT NAME BLDG. PERMIT NO. l9 91 PLAN FlLE NO. " 3P1STR~ MAT'L (TYPE,C.RI\DE,ETC.l 900566 Gene Chappo Architect Arthur Serata Engineerinq MQ Construction West Coast Iron Wyman Testing Laboratory ARCHITECT ESIGN STRENGTH SOURCE OR MFGR. ENGINEER E CRlDE MAT'L. (MIX DESIGN. RE-OAR GRADE 81 MFGR.1 43 6 370 Series Electrode GCNrnALCONTRAC~k CONTR. DOlNG REPORTED WORK LAB RECEIVING 81 TESTING CONSTR. MAT'L SAMPLES ~ ~" WELDING INSPECTION - 2-15 Visually inspected the fillet welding of struts (C6 x 10.5) both sides of beam 21 areas connections in the following locations: between lines F - H at G - 7.3 along building radius. procedures and techniques. Certified welders were observed for proper welding and unless otherwise noted are free of visible defects and in Completed welds were inspected for size, length, location, accordance with the approved plans and specifications. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE n\ hl. hi\ WORK TO COMPLY WITH 'THE APPROVE11 PLANS SPECIFICATIONS.& a ,\PP( ICABLt SEC.IIONS OF THE CITY OF SAN 1)lli;i'I flUlLlllNG LAWS. DP 13230 EVENING CREEK DRIVE SOUTH, SUITE 218 SAN DIEGO. CALIFORNIA 92120 (61 9) 48fi-0354 2-1 CONCRETE INSPECTION of concrete, mix design # 355 in the following locations: light Inspected the placement and consolidation of 9.5 cubic yards standards around lot perimeter. One set of 4 test cylinders taken from south of building line 5.5. Slump test results 5 1/2". Concrete supplied by Escondido Ready Mix. Ticket # 1290512, truck # 206. ., Wyman 13230 EVENING CREEK DRIVE SOUTH, SUITE 218 Testing SAN DIEGO. CALIFORNIA 92120 Laboratories (61 9) 48fi-0354 COVERING WOHK PEHFORMED ~~iIltlNC01~i:EL~CONCRETE LISTRUCT. STEEL ASSEMB1.Y II L Wyman 13230 EVENING CREEK DRIVE SOUTH, SUITE 218 Testing SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92128 Laboratories (619) 486-0354 COVEHING WOHK 1'tHk-OHMt-O I 11<1 IN1 OH1:tUCONCHtlE I kIHllCl.SIEEL ASStMli1.V ........ ....... . .......... ....... ................ "" .... - . ~~ . ". "" ~. "" ~~~~~~ - ROOFING 1-21 Weather: Sunny, Kettle 500' Crew: 1 Foreman, 7 Roof Mechan INSPECTION ics Observations: At the east side of the building, roofers are instalting base sheet prior to ply felt application. Ply felt application commences. Ply felts appear to be well saturated in hot asphalt. Cap sheet application is ongoing and appears to be well adhered to previously installed ply felts. Work observed today complies with project speciEications. c 13230 EVENING CREEK DRIVE SOUTH, SUITE 218 SAN DIEGO. CALIFORNIA 92128 (61 9) 486-0354 I Wyman Testing Laboratories ".~~ ~ ~ "" ~ .. -~ ~___ .. . .. ROOFING INSPECTION 1-19 Crew: 1 Foreman, 11 Roo€ Mechanics Weather: Sunny, Warm Kettle: 500' Observations: Roofers were nailina base 5 - do so throuah out the dav. Nailina was sheet an d continuing to specifications. Laying oE ply ielts is on-going and appears to be ~< per project well saturated in hot asphalt. Cap sheet is also.on-going and appears to be well adhered to previously installed ply felts. < Wyman 13230 EVENING CREEK DRIVE SOUTH, SUITE 218 Testing SAN DIEGO. CALIFORNIA 92128 Laboratories (61 9) 486-0354 COVERING WORK PERFORMED ilHElNFORCEDCONCRETE USTRUCT.SlEEL ASSEMBLY VYIIICII liEOLIIHEI> AI'I'HOVAL BY I II'HL SlllESSED CONCRETE flREINFORCEI) GYPSUM ~"~GLUE.LAM.FABRICATION i Illt SI'tCIAL lNSPEClOH OF I~IHtlNl-lJHCED MASONRY UPlLE DHlVlNti OD ADDRESS I IorHEH L812 Aston Avenue Car lshad Cobra GO€~NI"I"~ Structuraf Steev Assembly FOIL WEEK No' 90-292 SNYING 1-18 BLOC.. PERMlT NO. WN ~ n OR PRO, 19 9 900560 Gene Chapo & Associates Arthur Serata & Assoc. PLAN FlLE NO. ONBTR. MAT'L (T PE GRAD ETC.) ARCHITECT SGN STRENGTH SOURCE OR MFGR. " ENGINEER 8~-sc~,~n~ MAT'L. MIX DCSIGN. RE BAR GRADE MFGR.) Structurai StceL A36 Electrode E7018 GENERAL.CONTRACI%% " MQ CONTR. DOING REPORTED WORK West Coast Iron LAB RECEIVING e TESTING CONSTR. MITX SAMPLES - Wyman Testing Labs 1-17 WELDING INSPECTION Visually inspected the field welding of simpson g.1.b. strap connections in the following locations: lines G4, F4 and E4. Repair o€ g.1.h. seat at lines 7.9/E.6 and 6.5/F.3. Certi€ied welders were observed €or proper weLding procedures and technic4ues. and unless otherwise noted are free of visible defects and in Completed welds were inspected for size, length, location, accordance with the plans and specifications. -I CERTIFICATION OF C0MPI.IANCE I HtRFBY CERTIFY THAT I IiAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE IIEPOtlrtC WDHK. IINI.ESS O.rHERWlSE NOTEI) I HAVE FOUND .1111S SIGNATMRE OF REGISTERE0 INSPECTOR WOHK TU COMI'LY WI 01 'THE APPHOVEO PLANS SPECIFICATIONS.& APPLICABLESECTIONS OF THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO BUILDING LAWS. Q 1-(7 Z/ -r OF REPORT L REGISTER NUMBER LatJorarorles COVERING WORK PERFORMED ~~RElNFORCEDCONCRf iTE rhTRUCT. STEEL ASSEMBLY WHICH REOUIRED APPROVAL BY i~IPRE-STRESSEDCONCRElE ClRElNFORCED GYPSUM I:lGLlJE-LAM.FAsRlCATlDN THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF i.:lREINFORCEO MASONRY LlPlLE DRIVING L.IOTHER OD ADDRESS 140 Aston Road Car lsbad Cobra Golf TI Pre-Cast Concrete Tilt up FOR WEEK No. 90-292 ENOSNG 1-14 >WNER OR PROJECT NAME 19 91 BLDG. PERMIT NO. PLAN FILE NO. ZONSTR. MAT'L ITYPE.GRADE.ETC.) 900566 ARCHITECT )CBIGN STRENGTH SOURCE OR MFGR. ENGlNEER Gene Chapo & Assoc. Arthur Serata & ASSOC. >€SCRIBE MAT'L. (MIX DESIGN. RE-BAR GRAOE e MFGR.) ASTM A36 MiSC. Steel GENERAL~ZFF~~XEG~G~ "" - .. CONTH. OOINC. i<E<b-~'~~.~wOz>U 1-15 WELDING INSPECTTON hanger to embed perimeter angle connectinns in the following Visually inspected the fillet welding of simpsnn type beam locations: at 2nd floor line C at 7 thru 8; C.7 at 7.8 thru 8 per detail 6AA/S12. embed plate connections in the following locations: line C.7 at visually inspected the fiLlet welding of beam saddle to 7.8 at roof level per detail 17/513. Certified welders were observed for proper welding procedures and techniques. Completed welds were inspected for size, length, location, accnrdance with tllc aL)LJroved ancl sta~~~ped 1,1an.-;. and unless otherwise noted are free of vj.sible defects and in CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I IIEIIERY CEHTIFY TI-IAl I HAVE INSP'tCI'tO AL~I. OF THE ABOVE WORK l-IJ COMPLY Wl'rH ?HE APPROVEI) PL.ANS SPECIFICATIONS.& Iltl'OliTED WOHK. UNI.ESS OTHEHWISE NOrElJ I IlAVE FOUNDTHIS AI'PLICAHLESECTIONS OF 1HE CITY OF SAN UIEGO UlJlLDlNG LAWS. WELDING INSPECTION 1-15 perimeter angle connections in the following locations: second Visually inspected the fillet welding of beam hanger to level mezzanine line C at 7 thru 8; C.7 at 7.7 thru 8 per detail 6AA on sheet S12 of the plans. to embed plate connection in the following locations: second Visually inspected the fillet welding of beam hanger saddle level line C.7 at 7.7 per detail 17 on sheet 513 of the plans. Visually inspected the fillet welding of drag strut link connections in the following locations: roof level line 4 at C per detail 15 on sheet 512 of the plans. procedures and techniques. Certified welders were observed for proper welding and unless otherwise noted are free of v.i.si.ble defects and in Completed welds were inspected for si~ze, lencjth, location, accordance with the stamped approved plans. Wyman 13230 EVENING CREEK DRIVE SOUTH, SUITE 218 Testing SAN DIEGO. CALIFORNIA 92128 Laboratories (619) 486-0354 COVERING WORK PERFORMED OREINFORCEDCONCRETE OSTRUCT. STEEL ASSEMBLY WHICH REOUIREOAPPROVAL BY OPRE.STRESSEDCONCRETE OREINFORCE0 GYPSUM [~GLUE.LAM.FABRICATIO~ THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF C~REINFORCED MASONRY OPILE DRIVING rlnTupa I 0" AOOHESS .~ 1812 Aston Avenue Car Lsbad Cobra Golf No' 90-292 ENUING 12-28 Structural Steel Assembly IO,* WCEK lWNER OR PROJECT NAME BLDG. PERMYNO. " l9 90 PLAN FLLE NO. 900566 Gene Chapo Associates West Coast Iron Arthur Serata & ASSOC. MQ San Dieqo Const. weldins Wyman Testinq Labs ONSTR. MAT'L lTYPE.GRA0E.ETC.J ARCHITECT 8ESIC.N STRENGTH SOURCE OR MFGe. ENGSNEER 'ESCRIBE MAT'L. (MIX DESIGN. RE-BaR GRADE (L MFGR.) E70T-6 & E70T-11 GENERALCONTRACTOR " __ CONTR. DOlNG REPORTED WORK LAB RECEBVING e TESTING CONSTH. MAT'L SAMPLES " ___" 12-24 WELDING INSPECTION gusset connections in.the following locations: brace frame line 4 Visually inspected the fillet welding of brace frame tube to from G to I1 and li.ne 6 from E to F, done completly. Visually inspected the fillet welding of tube to gusset connections in the following locations: line 4 at H & 13.1. Certified welders were observed for proper welding procedures and techniques. and unless otherwise noted are free of visible defects and in Completed welds were inspected for size, length, location, accordance with the approved .drawings and the UBC. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE n - /3/ I HERFBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE I{EPORTEU WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS SPECIFICATIONS,& I!PPLICABLESECTIONS OF THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO BUILDING LAWS. r SIGNAT~F &EG~STE- INSPECTOR " d+Ld 2 >9 DATE OF REPORT REGISTER NUM-ER .L ' ~ Wyman 1&4?ff 13230 EVENING CREEK DRIVE SOUTH, SUITE 218 (619) 486-0354 Testing SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92128 Laboratories COVERING WORK PERFORMED UREINFORCEDCONCRETE OSTRUCT.STEEL ASSEMBLY WHICH REOUIRED APPROVAL BY [:~PRE.STRESSED CONCRETE OREINFORCED GYPSUM UGLUE-LAM.FABRICATION THt SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF UREINFORCED MASONRY UPILE DRIVING UOTHER ,013 nl>rJ,?L5* 1812 Aston Rd. Carlsbad Cobra Golf le 90 ENDING 1.2-28 No. 90-292 FOR WEEK OWNER OR PROJECT NaME BLDG. PERMIT NO. I 900566 PLAN FlLE NO. ~~ - """ I ,ONBTR. MAT'L (TVPE.GRADE.ETC.1 ARCHITECT bESIGN STRENGTH SOURCE OR MFGR. Chappo & Associates Serata & Associates MQ S.D. Construction Welding Wyman Testing Labs ENGINIER IEBCH3BE MAT'L. (MdX DCSIGN. RE-BAR GRADS % MFC.R.1 A36 E70 Electrodes GENERALCONTRACTO~ CONTR. DOONG REPORTED WORK LAB RECEIVING % TESTING CONSTR. MAT'L SAMPLES 12-28 WELDING INSPECTION connections in the following locations: W7, N8, E.5 at 8 (panel E-ll - Visually inspected the fillet welding of GLE to embed plate ~~ ~ ,- connections in the following locations: 8 at E & D. VisualLy inspected the fillet welding of bolt plateto beam connections in the following locations: 2nd floor 7 at E. Visually inspected the fillet welding of bolt plate reweld brace connections in the following locations: 8 at E L D. Visually inspected the fillet welding of diagonal angle at slotted hole connections in the following locations: F.4 at Visually inspected the fillet welding of bnlt plate beam web 6.5 (both sides of column); 6.1 at G.4 (south side); F.8 at 6.25 (north side). connections in the following locations: F.5 at 6.5, F.8 at 6.25, Visually inspected the fillet welding of GLE reweld G.4 at 6.1. Visually inspected the full penetration groove welding of "C" channel to embed plate connection in the following locations: G at 2.5, 1.2 at D & E. backing) welding of panel to weld plate connections in the Visually inspected the full penetration groove (with following locations: panel N7, 2nd floor and roof. Certified welders were observed for proper welding procedures and techniques. Completed welds were inspected for size, length, location, and unless otherwise noted are free of visible defects and in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. n h CERTIFICATION OFCOMPLIANCE n \ I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTtO ALL OF THE ABOVE IlEI'OH~rEl> WORK. [INLESS OTHERWISE NOTtU I HAVE FOUNOTIHIS ,&TA6TqbEo EGISTEHEO INSPEWOR WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS SPECIFICATIONS,& APPLICABLESECTIONS OF THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO BUILDING LAWS. DATE FREP RT \ Wyman Testing 13230 EVENING CREEK DRIVE SOUTH, SUITE 218 SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92128 (61 9) 486-0354 Laboratories COVERING WORK PERFORMED OREINFORCEDCONCRETE 0STRUCT.STEEL ASSEMBLY THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF OREINFORCED MASONRY OPILE DRIVING OOTHER I WHICH REWIRED APPROVAL BY UPRE.STRESSED CONCRETE OREINFORCED GYPSUM OGLUE.LAM.FABRICAT~O~ 00 ADDRESS 1812 Aston Rd. Car lsbad 1.0. 90-292 IENOING 12-211 I“ 90 *OH WCEK I >WNER OR PROJECT NAME Cobra Golf .. BLDG. PERMIT NO. 900566 PLAN FlLE NO. :ONSTR. MAT’L ITYPE,GHADE.ETC.) BESIGN STRENGTH SOURCE OR MFGR. ENGINEER IESCHIIIE MAT’L. lMlX DESIGN. RE-OAR GRADE S MFGR.1 Serata & Associates ASTM A706 Gr. 60 A36 E70 Electrodes Skips We%lng GENERALCONTRACTOX CONTR. DOING PPRTED WORK LAB RECEIVING LL TESTING CONSTR. MAT.L SAMPLES Wyman Testing Labs WELDING INSPECTION 12-27 in the following locations: s4/w7, Sl/E4, ~3/E8, ~10/E8, S1/~6, Visually inspected the flare bevel welding of chord bar connections in the following locations: panel E4. Visually inspected the fillet welding of plate to plate tilt up panel connection in the following locations: E2/column (2 at D Line), ~1/~2 ) lower connection, E2/E2A, E2A/E3, N6/W6. welded with mill certificates. Reinforcing steel is A706 Verified the carbon equivalent of reinforcing steel to be requiring no preheat per table 5.2 of AWS D1.4. Certified welders were observed for proper welding procedures and techniques. Completed welds were inspected for size, length, location, and unless otherwise noted are free of visible defects and in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS SPECIFICATIONS,& IitPOHlE13 WOHK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTEC I I-IAVE FOUND THIS APPLICABLESECTIONS OF THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO BUILDING LAWS. Wyman Testing 13230 EVENING CREEK DRIVE SOUTH, SUITE 218 SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92128 (619) 486-0354 Laboratories COVERING WORK PERFORMED ~~REINFORCEOCONCRETE OSTRUCT. STEEL ASSEMBLY WHICH REOUIRED APPROVAL BY OPRE-STRESSEDCONCRETE OREINFORCED GYPSUM ~GLUE-LAM,FABRICATION THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF flRElNFORCED MASONRY UPlLE DRIVING OOTHER OS ADDRESS 1812 Aston Rd. Car lsbad OG PE > N RORP o E TNAM~ ENOING .L2-28 NO. 90-292 I9 9e FOR WEEK &bra Cooif 06 5 &?IT No' PLAN FILE NO. :ONSTR. MAT'L (TIPE.GRADE.ETC.1 A(?fl%Fa~ & Associates gerata & Associates & lE51GN STRENGTH SOURCE OR MFGR. L GlNEER >A~~#BE MAr'L. Atf..@ETCXt&pE-BAR I I GRADE (t MFGR.1 GE ERALCONTRACTOR E70 Series Electrodes CONTR. DOING REPORTED.WORK LAB RECEIVING e TESTING CONSTR. MAT'L SAMPLES S.D. Construction Welding Wyman Testing Labs 12-26 WELDING INSPECTION Visually inspected the fillet welding of bolt plate to beam connections in the following locations: H at 6, 5.25, 4.7 & 4; J at 4.75, 5.2. connections in the following locations: 7 at C; G at 2.1 & 2.3 Visually inspected the fillet welding of boLt plate to embed (panel N3), H at 2.1 & 2.3 (panel N4). Visually inspected the fillet welding of t.s. diagonaL brace connections in the following locations: F at 7.3 L 7.0. VisuaLly inspected the fillet welding of strut to beam connections in the fnllowing locations: undersj.de weld F at 7.75, I1 at 6. connections in the following locations: top side weld F at 8.75, Visually inspected the groove welding of t.s. strut to beam H at 6. Visually inspected the fillet welding of t.s. strut splice plates in the following locations: F at 7.2, H.5 at 6. Certified welders were observed for proper welding procedures and techniques. Completed welds were inspected for size, length, location, and unless otherwise noted are free of visible defects and in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE REPORTED WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUNOTHIS WORK TO COMPLY WKH THE APPROVED PLANS SPECIFICATIONS, LG APPLICABLESECTIONS OF THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO BUILDING LAWS. REGISTER NUMBER Wyman 13230 EVENING CREEK DRIVE SOUTH, SUITE 218 Testing SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92128 Laboratories (619) 486-0354 COVERING WORK PERFORMED OREINFORCEDCONCRETE OSTRUCT.STEEL ASSEMBLY WHICH REOUIRED APPROVAL BY UPRE-STRESSEDCONCRETE OREINFORCED GYPSUM ~GLUE-LAM.FABRICATION THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF flRElNFORCE0 MASONRY OPlLE DRIVING UOTHER I 38 ADDRESS 1812 Aston Drive Carlsbad FOH WEEK 9 ;TrOaR 'Egff N I\ M E No. 90-292 ENDING 12-14 BLDG. PERMIT NO. 19 900566 Gene Chap= PLAN FILE NO. FSTR. AT'L IT PE GRADE.ETC.1 ESIGN STRENGTH elnForced concrete - ARCHITECT SOURCE OR MFGR. - f'c 3000 psi Escondido Ready Mix Sowards & 13rown ENGINEER ASTM C94 Ready Mix Concrete ESCHIOE MAT'L.. lMlX "<SIGN RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) GENEHALCO-A?6< "" _____ .. " "" Mix Design #I 355 ASTM A615 Reinf. N & L Concrete Steel Gr. 60 Wyman Testing Labs CONTH. DOING HEVOHTtD WOHW LAB RECEIVING &TESTING CONSTR. MAT'L SAMPLES 12-12 CONCRETE INSPECTION footings and columns per S-1 notes and S-2A thru S-15A. Inspected the reinforcing steel installation for panels, Inspected reinfoicing steel for size, grade, lap, locations, ~~ ~ ~ ~~ - and clearance. Verified member dimensions with inplace formwork. Checked locations of embedded items and sleeves. of concrete, mix design it 355 add mix pozz high each 02. 16 in Inspected the placement and consolidation of 205 cubic yards the following locations: panels E-1 thru E-6; E-2A, N4, N7 thru 9, W-6, S1 & 2; dock wall; stair panel; four columns between Lines 6 thru 7 and F & G; 1 column line 11 at 1..7; footing lines 2.5 at I1 thru G & G2.5 tllru 2 at G. right corner. Slump test results 4 1/2", temperature 72O and One set of 4 test cylinders taken from panel # 5-2 bottom taken at 47.50 c.y. Concrete supplied by Escondido Ready Mix. Ticket # 350850, truck # 512. top of ledger. Slump test results 6", temperature 75O and One set of 4 test cylinders taken from panel # W-6, middle taken at 114 c.y. truck # 512. Concrete supplied by Escondido Ready Mix. Ticket # 350863, middle both ways. Slump test results 4 1/2", temperature 74O and One set of 4 test cylinders taken from panel lintel E-2 taken at 161.50 c.y. Concrete supplied by Escondido Ready Mix. Ticket # 350880, truck # 491. Work inspected is in accordance with the approved plans and specifications per UBC. CEHTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HIIFIEIIY CEIITIFY .TIHA1 I HAVE INSPECTED AILL OF THE ABOVE IiEl'Oll~rtD WOHK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTEU I HAVE FOUNDTHIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS SPECIFICATIONS,& APPLICABLESECTIONS OF THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO BLJlLUlNG LAWS. EGISTERED INSPECTOR /zb,uflui DATE OF REPORT 333 REGISTER NUMBER Wyman 13230 EVENING CREEK DRIVE SOUTH, SUITE 218 Testing SAN DIEGO. CALIFORNIA 92128 Laboratories (619) 486-0354 THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF OREINFORCE0 MASONRY OPlLE DRIVING OOTHER I COVERING WORK PERFORMED OREINFORCEDCONCRETE OSTRUCT. STEEL ASSEMBLY WHICH REWIRED APPROVAL BY OPR'E-STRESSEDCONCRETE OREINFORCEO GYPSUM OGLUE.LA,M.FABRICATION OS ADDRESS 1812 Aston Carlsbad Cobra Golf FOR WESK >WNSR OR PROJECT NAME No. 90-292 ENDING 12-21 BLDG. PERMIT NO. '9 9c PLAN FlLE NO. BESIGN STRENGTH 3000 psi A615 Grade 60 SOURCE OR MFGR. I Escondido Ready Mix ENGINEER IESCRIBE MAT'L. (MIX DESIGN. RE-BAR GRADE LL MFGR.) GENERAL. CONTRACTOR - - CONTR. UOING HEPOHTED WORN LAB RECEIVING LL TESTlNG CONSTR. MAT'L SAMPLES Wyman Testing Laboratories 12-20 CONCRETE INSPECTION per details 11 & 16 on sheet S-13 of approved drawings. and clearance. Inspected the reinforcing steel installation for footings Inspected reinforcing steel for size, grade, lap, locations, Verified member dimensions with inplace formwork. Verified dimensions of excavated locations. Checked locations of embedded items and sleeves. Inspected the placement and consolidation of 19 cubic yards of concrete, mix design # 5412451 in the foLLowing locations: footings at truck ramp and dock walls along D line. One set of 4 test cylinders taken from footing at truck ramp. slump test results 3". Concrete supplied by Escondido Ready Mix. 1286913, truck # 444. Ticket # Work inspected is in accordance with the approved plans. CERTIFICATION OFCOMPLIANCE n n .n ,, I IHEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE UA Dh \\.I?Kl"lslC l<tPOHTED WORK, UNI.ESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUNDTHIS - ISlGN4TURE OF ReC.ISTCR<D lNsP!ZCIOR WORK TO COMPLY wmtl THE APPROVED PLANS SPECIFICATIONS,& c/lK I 2 '.~ 10 - 70 a APPL1CAHLESECTIONS OF THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO BUILDING LAWS. DATE OF REPORT REGlSTER NUMBER Wyman 13230 EVENING CREEK DRIVE SOUTH, SUITE 218 Testing SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92128 Laboratories (61 9) 486-0354 COVERING WORK PERFORMED nRElNFORCEOCONCRETE OSTRUCT. STEEL ASSEMBLY WHICH REOUIRED APPROVAL BY UPRE-STRESSED CONCRETE UREINFORCED GYPSUM OGLUE.LAM,FABRICATION THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF OREINFORCEDMASONRY UPILE DRIVING DOTHER I ,OD ADORE55 1812 Aston Avenue Car lsbad OWNER on PROJECT NAME Cobra Golf Reinforced Concrete FO" WEEK No. 90-292 ENDUNG 12-14 BLDG. PERMIT NO. PLAN FlLE NO. qaa56fi CONSTR. MAT'L (TYPE.GRADE.ETC.) OESIGN STRENGTH ISOURCE OR MFGn. I Escondido Ready Mix DISCHIBE MAT'L. IMlX DESIGN. RE-BAR GRADE a MFGR.) r2scLndido Regy Mix # 355 5. I ARCHITECT -ll-_- ENGINEER Gene Chappo & Assoc. : Arthur Serata & Assoc. 5 SK Mix MQ Construction lix (3000 psi) MO Cqnstruction GENERALCONTRACTOH CONTH. DOlNG REPORTED WORK LAB RECEIVING & TESTING GONSTH. MAT'L SAMPLES l ASTM A615 Gr. 60 WymanTesting Labs 12-13 CONCRETE INSPECTION details 1, 3 & 12 on sheet S-13A of approved drawings. and clearance. Inspected the reinforcing steel installation for columns per Inspected reinforcing steel for size, grade, lap, locations, Verified member dimensions with inplace formwork. Verified dimensions of excavated locations. Checked locations of embedded items and sleeves. (approximately) cubic yards of concrete, mix design # 355 in the Inspected the placement and consolidation of 4 1/2 following locations: in two columns, D on line 0 and D.2 on line 8. One set of 4 test cylinders taken from the bottom of the column on line 8 at D.2. slump test .results 4". Concrete supplied by Escondido Ready Mix. Ticket # 1286147, truck # 542. through caisson column. Inspected proper lap, grade, and Inspected alL replacements of grade beam steel running placement connecting the two columns. Work inspected is in accordance with the approved plans and the UBC. CEHTII~ICATION OF COMPLIANCE I IICHERY CERTIFY .rim I ItAvr: INSP~CTEII AI,I OF TIIE ABOVE I~tl'Ullltl> WOHK. IINl.tSS (J~rlltt~WlSt NOltlI I IIAVE FOlJNU'llllS WORK TO COMPLY WIrH rHE APPHOVEU PLANS SPECIFICATIONS.& APPLICABLESECTIONS OF .THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO BUILDING LAWS. Wyman 13230 EVENING CREEK DRIVE SOUTH, SUITE 218 Testing SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92128 Laboratories (61 9) 486-0354 COVERING WORK PERFORMED OREINFORCEDCONCRETE OSTRUCT.STEEL ASSEMBLY WHICH REDUlREO APPROVAL BY OPRE-STRESSEDCONCRETE OREINFORCED GYPSUM 0GLUE-LAM.FABRICATION THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF OREINFORCEDMASONRY OPlLE DRIVING OOTHER 108 ADDRESS 1812 Aston 1.O. 90-292 IENDING 12-14 (8 9 FOR WeEK DESIGN STRENGTH SOURCE OH MFGR. Lincoln ENGINEER DL RI~E MAT'L. IM~X DESIGN RE-BAR GR~OE ~t MFGR.~ EIfectrode AWS E7dXX Serles Rebar ASTM A706 (#5) Embed Plate ASTM A36 Wyman Testing Labs GENERALCONTRASTOR MQ Skips Welding CONTR. DOING REPORTED WORK LAB RECIIVINE L TLSTlNG CONBTR. MAT'L SAMPLES 12-12 WELDING INSPECTION Visually inspected the flare bevel groove welding of ASTM A706 two # 5 rebar to embed plate connections in the following locations: lintel N-4; two additional # 5 bars were necessary due to the fact the embeds where fabricated with only one # 5 and two where called for. procedures and techniques. Certified welders were observed for proper welding and unless otherwise noted are free of visible defects and in Completed welds were inspected for size, length, location, accordance with the approved plans and the AWS ~1.4. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS SPECIFICATIONS,& REPORTED WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUNDTHIS UNATU OP RLC~~STEREO Wprcroa APPLICABLESECTIONS OF THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO BUILDING LAWS. 2 -I t-70 DAT~ OF RECORT RLGlSTER NVMIleR Wyman Testing 13230 EVENING CREEK DRIVE SOUTH, SUITE 218 SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92128 (619) 486-0354 Laboratories COVERING WORK PERFORMED nRElNFORCEDCONCRETE 0STRUCT.STEEL ASSEMBLY WHICH REOUIREO APPROVAL BY OPRE-STRESSED CONCRETE nRElNFORCE0 GYPSUM OGLUE.LAM,FABRICATION THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF nRElNFORCED MASONRY OPlLE DRIVING flOTHER JOB ADDRESS 1812 Aston Avenue Cobra Golf No' 90-292 ENDING 12-15 FOR WEEK OWNER OR PROJECT NAME BLDG. PERMlT NO. l9 91 PLAN FlLE NO. CONSTR. MAT'L ITYPF,GHAOE.ETC.I ARCHITECT 900566 " DESIGN STRENGTH 3000 si Escondido Ready Mix A615 Grade ~ 68 Flix~i,i~!!~..lt_1412~~~-.~~ ~~ SOURCE?e.MFC,R. - ENGSNEen t>ESCHI=E?AT.L. (MIX DESIGN. RE-mAR owaoZ-GFsn.1 " GENEHILCONTRACTOn CoNrn. DOING HEPOHTYD WOHK " LAB RECEIVING LL TESTING CONSTR. MAT'L SAMPLES Wvman Testing Labs ~- _____"~._____.. 12-11 CONCRETE INSPECTION per details noted on sheet S-1 of approved drawings. and clearance. Inspected the reinforcing steel installation for footings Inspected reinforcing steel for size, grade, lap, locations, Verified member dimensions with inplace formwork. Verified dimensions of excavated locations. Checked locations of embedded items and sleeves. Inspected the placement and consolidation of 28.5 cubic yards of concrete, mix design # 5412 in the following locations: footings along 6-7 line. One set of 4 test cylinders taken from D-6. Slump test results 4". truck # 543. Concrete supplied by Escondido Ready Mix. Ticket # 1285880, Work inspected is in accordance with the approved plans. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE n I\ n fl I I,. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE (. \,~i.)k ,tb HEPORTED WORK. UNI.ESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUNDTHIS S!GP TunE or REGISTERLO INSPECTOR WJ x IC" 1812 Aston Avenue Cobra Golf Reinforced Concrete r"" WCCn Car lsbad 98GlSfiGl 19 I END~NG 12-14 No. 90-292 OWNER OR PRo>Ecr NAME BLDG. PERMlT NO. PLAN FILE NO. CONSTR. MAT'L iTVPE.GRAm..C1ti.l ^Fr.-_ ~ YL31YI.>I"CI."l" Gene Chappo & Assoc. Serata & Associates MQ MQ Wyman Testing Labs SOURCE OR MFGR. I J.W. Steel ENGINEER DESCRIBE MAT'L. (MIX DESIGN. RE-BAR GRADE Lt MFGR.1 Rebar A615 Gr. 60 GENERALCONTRACTOR A706 Gr. 60 CONTR. OOlNG REPORTED WORK LAB RECEIVING (li TESTING CONSTR. MAT% SAMPLES Wyman 13230 EVENING CREEK DRIVE SOUTH, SUITE 218 Testing SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92128 Laboratories (61 9) 486-0354 COVERING WORK PERFORMED OREINFORCED CONCRETE OSTRUCT. STEEL ASSEMBLY WHICH REOUIRED APPROVAL BY OPRE-STRESSEDCONCRETE OREINFORCED GYPSUM OGLUE.LAM.FABRICATION THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF OREINFORCEDMASONRY OPILE DRIVING nOTHER - 3 - - - - - - - - 12-11 REINFORCING STEEL VERIFICATION Inspected the reinforcing steel installation for panels marked S1, 52, N7, N8, N9, N4, N5, W7, W6, El, E2, E2A, E3, E5, E6, DW as per detail 1 to 10 on sheet S1; detail 1 to 15 on sheet S2A; detail 1-16 on sheet S10A, also concrete columns located at lines D8, 8 & D.9, H & 1.6; 4 each columns 59' from and detail 5 on sheet s10. radius point located at lines H & 7 as per detail 14 on sheet 515 Inspected reinforcing steel for size, grade, lap, locations, and clearance. Work inspected is in accordance with the plans and specifications. I III:IIEfiY CENllbY IllAl I HAVE INSPECTtlJ Al~l. OF THE ABOVE CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WORK TO COMPLY WIIII THE APPROVED PLANS SPECIFICATIONS.& 1111'0I~~lk11 WOIIK. lINI.1:;:; OI'IiEHWISt NOlEll I IlAVE FOUNOTHIS SIGNATU))R: OF REGISTERED INSPECTOR APPLICABLESECTIONS OF THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO BUILDING LAWS. 0 /2-i/ - 90 4/2 DATE OF REPORT RLOISTER NUMBER Wyman 13230 EVENING CREEK DRIVE SOUTH, SUITE 218 Testing SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92128 Laboratories (619) 486-0354 COVERING WORK PERFORMED OREINFORCEDCONCRETE OSTRUCT. STEEL ASSEMBLY WHICH REQUIRED APPROVAL BY OPRE-STRESSEDCONCRETE OREINFORCEO GYPSUM OGLUE.LAM.FABRICA\TION ~~~~ - ~ " - THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF OREINFORCED MASONRY OPILE DRIVING OOTHER OB *DORE55 1812 Aston Avenue Car Lsbad 3000 psi REinforced Concrete Cobra Golf ENDING 12-14 19 g No. 90-292 FOR WEEK DWNER OR PROJECT NAME BLOC.. PERMIT NO. PLAN FILE NO. 900566 .ONSTR. MAT'L1TYPE.GRADE.ETC.J ARCHITECT Gene Chapo & Associates tE51GN STRENGTH SOURCE OR MFGR. ENGINEER Escondido Readv Mix Arthur Serata & ASSOC. 1ESCRIBE MAT'L. (MIX DESIGN. RE-BAR GRADE e MFCIR.1 GENERALCONTRACTOR 12-10 UNSCHEDULED CANCELLATION Reported to project site for scheduled reinforcing steel inspection. Due to conditions outside our control, rebar inspection was set back at day, scheduLed work was cancelled without notice. No inspections were performed. CERTIFICATION OFCOMPLIANCE n 1itI'OH.rED WOHK. UNLESS OTHEHWISE NOTE11 I HAVE FOUNOTHIS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE SIGNATURE c#~<G~~TEREW~~PECTOR WOHK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS SPECIFICATIONS, L3 APPLICARLESECTIONS OF THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO BUILDING LAWS. ~\ Wyman 13230 EVENING CREEK DRIVE SOUTH, SUITE 218 Testing SAN DIEGO. CALIFORNIA 92128 Laboratories (61 9) 486-0354 UNSCHEDULED CANCELLATION Reported to project site for scheduled reinforcing steel for inspection, scheduled work was cancelled without notice. NO inspection. Due to conditions outside our control, not ready inspections were performed. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HtClFBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE IlEPOriTED WORK. UN1.ESS OTHERWISE NOTE0 I HAVE FOUND THIS IwjiiK 10 COMI’I Y WI rtl IIIE A1’I’HOVFIl III AN5 St‘l CII’ICATIONS. XI iill~li I[:AI;I ksc(:l IONS 01. 1111- CITY Ob :;AN IIll.(iO IIIJILInING LAWS. Wyman 13230 EVENING CREEK DRIVE SOUTH, SUITE 218 Testing SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92128 Laboratories (619) 486-0354 COVERING WORK PERFORMED nRElNFORCEDCONCRETE USTRUCT.STEEL ASSEMBLY WHICH REQUIRED APPROVAL BY OPRE-STRESSED CONCRETE OREINFORCED GYPSUM OGLUE.LAM.FABRICATION THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF UREINFORCED MASONRY DPlLE DRIVING rl0THER I OB #DDRE55 - - . . . -. . 1812 Aston ENDING 90-292 12-7 '9 91 NO. FOR WEEK )WNER OR PROJECT NAME Cobra Golf BLDG. PERMIT NO. PLAN FILE NO. 900566 Gene Chappo :ONSTR. MAT'L (TYPE.GRA0E.ETC.J ARCHITECT BESIGN STRENGTH SOURCE OR MFGR. f'c 3000 psi Escondido Ready Mix ASTM A615 Gr. 60 Mix Design # 355 Sowards & Brown Wyman Testing Laboratories A307, A36 E70 Series Electrodes ENGINEER IESCRIBE MAT.L. IM~X DESIGN. RE-~AR GRADE (L MFGR.~ GENERILCONTRACTOR MQ MO CONTR. DOlNG REPORTCO WORK LAB RECEIVING (L TESTING CONSTR. MAT'L SAMPLES I REMARKS, ETC., Includes information about amounts of material placed or work performed; number, type, and LOCATIONS OF WORK INSPECTED, TEST SAMPLES TAKEN, WORK REJECTED, JOB PROBLEMS, PROGRESS, OATE identity numbers of test samples taken; structural connections (welds made, h.t. bolts torqued) checked; etc. 12-7 WELDING INSPECTION Visually inspected the flare bevel welding of three # 5 hairpins with a 12" section of # 6 bar in hook connections in the following locations: placement in panel E-2A. bars (4) to weld plate connections in the foll.owing locations: Visually inspected the double groove welding of A706 chord panel ~3. Carbon equivalent is unknown requiring a prefleat of 500O per table 5.2 of AWS D1.4. Certified weLders were observed €or proper welding procedures and techniques. Completed welds were inspected for size, length, location, and unless otherwise noted are free of visible defects and in accordance with the approved plans. 1 CERTIFICATION OFCOMPLIANCE I IHFRERY CERTIFY TIIAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS SPECIFICATIONS, & HEPORTED WORK, UNLtSS OTHERWISE NOlEL) I HAVE FOUNDTlilS REGISTEIZEO INSPECTO APPLICABLESECTIONS OF THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO BUILDING LAWS. C,GJ DATE OF'REPORT REGISTER NVMBPR Wyman Testing Laboratories 13230 EVENING CREEK DRIVE SOUTH, SUITE 218 SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92128 (61 9) 486-0354 ~ ~~ ~ ~~~ COVERING WORK PERFORMED OREINFORCED CONCRETE OSTRUCT. STEEL ASSEMBLY WHICH REOUIRED APPROVAL BY OPRE-STRESSED CONCRETE OREINFORCED GYPSUM OGLUE.LAM.FABRICATION THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF OREINFORCED MASONRY OPILE DRIVING OOTHER OB ADDRESS 1812 Aston Cobra Golf ENDING 12-7 No. 90-292 FOR WEEK IWNER OR PROJECT NAME '9 9 BLDG. PERMlT NO. 900566 Gene Chappo PLAN FlLE NO. ONSTR. MAT'L (TIPE.GRADE.ETC.) ARCHBTECT - SESIGN STRENGTH SOURCE OR MFGR. f'c 3000 psi Escondido peady Mix ASTM A615 Gr. 60 Mlx Design # 355 Sowards & Brown WYman Testinq Laboratories R307, A36 E70 Series Electrodes ENGINEER ESCPlBE MAT'C. {MIX DESIGN. RE-BAR GR-riE & MFGR. GENERALCONTRACTOH ~___._ - MQ CONTR. DOING REPOllTED WORK "__________ MO LAm RECElVlNG a TESTING CONSTR. MAT'L SAMPLES LOCATIONS OF WORK INSPECTED, TEST SAMPLES TAKEN, WORK REJECTED, JOB PROBLEMS, PROGRESS, REMARKS, ETC., Includes information about amounts of material placed or work performed; number, type, and -~ - I- DATE identity numbers of test samples taken; structural connections (welds made, h.t. bolts torqued) checked; etc. "" 12-7 CONCRETE INSPECTION of concrete, mix design # 355 in the following 'Locations: panels Inspected the placement and consolidation of 247 cubic yards test results 4 3/4". truck # 488. test results 4 1/4". truck # 488. test results 4 3/4". truck # 538. One set of 4 test cylinders taken from panel w-1. slump Concrete supplied by Escondido Ready Mix. Ticket # 350738, One set of 4 test cyclinders taken from panel N-2. Slump Concrete supplied by Escondido Ready Mix. Ticket # 350748, One set of 4 test cylinders tkean from panel 5-5. Slump Concrete supplied by Escondido Ready Mix. Ticket # 350764, A CERTIFICATION OFCOMPLIANCE n I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE I REPORTED WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUNDTHIS SIGNATURE OF EGISTERED INSPtiTTOR WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS SPECIFICATIONS, & I z - >-.. i) ' '?a c, APPLICAULESECTIONS OF 1~bIE CITY OF SAN DIEGO BIJILDING ILAWS. - w OaTE "1.' "El.O,*T I1EGilSTEH NllMBER Wyman Testing Laboratories L 13230 EVENING CREEK DRIVE SOUTH, SUITE 218 SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92128 (619) 486-0354 COVERING WORK PERFORMED OREINFORCED CONCRETE DSTRUCT. STEEL ASSEMBLY WHICH REOUIRED APPROVAL BY OPRE.STRESSEDCONCRETE OREINFORCED GYPSUM DGLUE.LAM.FABRICATION THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF L~REINFORCED MASONRY OPlLE DRIVING DOTHER OS ADORES5 1812 Aston Cobra Golf NO. 90-292 ENOING FOR WEEK tWNER OR PROJECT NAME BLOC. PERMlT NO. PLAN FlLE NO, 12-7 '9 9r ONSTR. MAT'L lTYPE.GRAOE.ETC.1 ARCHITECT 900566 Gene Chappo IESIGN STRENGTH f'c 3000 psi Escondido Ready Mix Sowards & Brown SOURCE OR MFGR. ENGINEER SESCHIOE MAT'!.. (MIX DESIGN. RE-BAR GRAOE (L MI'GR.1 GENERALCONTRACTOR ". Mix . . Design # 3.55 - MO CONTR. OOING WYPOWllrl) WOHK ASTM A615 Gr. 60 ~.~ .. "" LAB RECEIVING (L TESTING CONSTR. MAT'LSAMCLES MO Wyman Testinq Laboratories I LOCATIONS OF WORK INSPECTED, TEST SAMPLES TAKEN, WORK REJECTED, JOB PROBLEMS, PROGRESS, REMARKS, E'TC., Includes information about amounts of material placed or work performed; number, type, and - ~" OATE identity numbers of test samples taken; structural connections (welds made, h.t. bolts torqued) checked; etc. CONCRETE INSPECTION 12-7 per details noted on sheet S-3A of approved drawings. and clearance. Inspected the reinforcing steel installation for footings Inspected reinforcing steel for size, grade, Lap, locations, Verified dimensions of excavated locations. Checked locations of embedded items and sleeves. Inspected the placement and consolidation of 47.5 cubic yards of concrete, mix design # 5412451 in the following locations: footing line C at 7.5-6.9, 6.3 at D.8-C, R.8 at 6.95- 6.5, 6.5 at B.l-A, A at 6.5-5.75 (minus 8' in center), A-D at 5.6-5.75, B at 5.6-5.2. One set of 4 test cylinders taken from B at 5.6. SLump test results 4 1/4". Concrete supplied by Escondido Ready Mix. Ticket # 350773, truck # 538. 7.1, 7.L at 0.8-8.3, B.3 at 7.1-6.4. 6.4 at 0.1-13.3, B.1~ at 6.4- I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTEI) ALL OF THE ABOVE CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE f?EPORTED WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTtl) I HAVE FOUNDTHIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS SPECIFICATIONS.& APPLICABLESECTIONS OF THE CITY OF SAN Olt(S0 8UlLDlNG LAWS. I REMARKS, ETC., Includes information about amounts of material placed or work performed; number, type, and LOCATIONS OF WORK INSPECTED, TEST SAMPLES TAKEN, WORK REJECTED, JOB PROBLEMS, PROGRESS, OATE identity numbers of test samples taken; structural connections (welds made, h.t. bolts torqued) checked: etc. I CONCRETE INSPECTION Wyman 13230 EVENING CREEK DRIVE SOUTH, SUITE 218 Testing SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92128 Laboratories (619) 486-0354 COVERING WORK PERFORMED OREINFORCED CONCRETE OSTRUCT. STEEL ASSEMBLY WHICH REQUIRED APPROVAL BY OPRE-STRESSED CONCRETE OREINFORCEO GYPSUM OGLUE.LAM.FABRICA.TION THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF OREINFORCED MASONRY OPlLE DRIVING OOTHER - 3 - - - - - - - - - - 12-6 per details noted on sheet S3A of approved drawings. and clearance. Inspected the reinforcing steel installation for footings Inspected reinforcing steel for size, grade, lap, locations, Verified member dimensions with inplace formwork. Verified dimensions of excavated locations. Checked locations of embedded items and sleeves. of concrete, mix design # 5412451 in the following locations: Inspected the placement and consoli.dation of 56 cubic yards line H, 3.5 - 4 : line I, B through 11; line C between 7 and 8. One set of 4 test cylinders taken from line 1 between C and D. slump test results 3 1/2”. Concrete supplied by Escondido Ready Mix. Ticket #1285284, Work inspected is in accordance with the approved truck #491. specifications and plans per UBC. CERTIFICATION OFCOMPLIANCE /” -7 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE A&>. 4753” REPORTED WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I IiAVE FOUNDTHIS XTURE OF REL~ISTEREO INSPECTOR WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS SPECIFICATIONS, & APPLICABLESECTIONS OF THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO BUILDING LAWS. ex‘& ’4s Q SJ Wyman 13230 EVE Testing SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92128 iNlNG CREEK DRIVE SOUTH, SUITE 218 Laboratories COVERING WORK PERFORMED OREINFORCEDCONCRETE OSTRUCT. STEEL ASSEMBLY WHICH REQUIRED APPROVAL BY OPRE-STRESSED CONCRETE OREINFORCED GYPSUM OGLUE-LAM.FAERICATION THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF OREINFORCED MASONRY OPlLE DRIVING OOTHER Mn rnnstrtlrt inn Wyman TPstino - -ieq LAB RECEIVING LL TESTING CONSTR. MAT'L SAMPLES LOCATIONS OF WORK INSPECTED, TEST SAMPLES TAKEN, WORK REJECTED, JOE PROBLEMS, PROGRESS, REMARKS, ETC., Includes information about amounts of material placed or work performed; number, type, and ~____ OATE identity numbers of test samples taken; structural connections (welds made, h.t. bolts torqued) checked; etc. REINFORCING STEEL VERIFICATION 12-6 Inspected the reinforcing steel installation for panels W1, W2, W3, W4, W5, W6, N1, N2, N3, N6, S4, S5, and S1O per details noted on sheet S8A, S9A, Sl0A and 15/S2A of approved drawings. and clearance. Inspected reinforcing steel for size, grade, lap, locations, Verified member dimensions with inplace formwork. VeriEied dimensions of excavated locations. Checked locations of embedded items and sleeves. Work inspected is in accordance with the approved speciEications and plans per UBC. CERTIFICATION OFCOMPLIANCE I/? 4 /?*,L.U n%t=e" REPORTED WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUNDTHIS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS SPECIFICATIONS.& /2/DY V5,-3%?97- RY APPLICABLESECTIDNS OF THE CITY OF SAN DlEGO BUILDING LAWS. MATE WF REPORT ' ' RE ISZSNZMsER 5 G URE OF ReGl6TERED INSPECTOR U ADDRESS 1812 Aston Avenue Cobra Golf FOH WEEK No. 90-292 ENUING 12-7 19 91 WNER OR PROJECT NAME I 0NST.R. AT'L ITVPE GRADE.ETC.) RelnTorced toncrete ARCHITECT """ ESIGN STRENGTH ISOURCE OR MFGR. iCUc.UCCO Gene Chapo & Associates SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92128 (619) 486-0354 Laboratories COVERING WORK PERFORMED OREINFORCEDCONCRETE OSTRUCT. STEEL ASSEMBLY WHICH REOUIRED APPROVAL BY OPRE-STRESSEDCONCRETE OREINFORCE0 GYPSLIM ~GLUE.I.AM.FABRICATION THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF OREINFORCED MASONRY OPILE DRIVING flOTliEl7 - a - - - - - - - - - . .. - & Associates 1 Construction Reinforcing Steel A615 #5 & Smaller MQ Construction Grade 40, #6 & Larger Grade 60 Wyman Testing Laboratories CONTR. DOING REPORTED WORK LAm RECEIVING TESTING CONSTR. MAT'L SAMPLES I LOCATIONS OF WORK INSPECTED, TEST SAMPLES TAKEN, WORK REJECTED, JOB PROBLEMS, PROGRESS, identity numbers of test samples taken; structural connections (welds made, h.t. bolts torqued) checked; etc. - ETC., Includes information about amounts of material placed or work performed; number, type, and - CONCRETE INSPECTION 12-1 panels per details noted on sheet S9A of approved drawings. and clearance. Inspected the reinforcing steel installation for tilt up Inspected reinforcing steel for size, grade, lap, locations, Verified member dimensions with inplace formwork. Verified dimensions of excavated locations. Checked locations of embedded items and sleeves. Inspected the placement and consolidation of 171 cubic yards 53, S6, 57, S8, S9, El, E8, and N10. of concrete, mix design # 355 in the following locations: panels One set of 4 test cylinders taken from panel 57. slump test results 4". Concrete supplied by Superior Ready Mix. Ticket C21412, One set of 4 test cylinders taken from panel 53. Slump test results 5". Concrete supplied by Superior Ready Mix. Ticket #214134, Work inspected is in accordance with the approved truck #527. truck #528. specifications and plans per UBC. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE /;' ,, . I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUNDTHIS WORK TO COMPLY WIT11 THE APPROVE0 PLANS SPECIFICATIONS, L3 APPL ICAllLESECTlONS i>f~ 'TllE CITY OF SAN DIEGO BlllLOlNG LAWS. .. Wyman 13230 EVENING CREEK DRIVE SOUTH. SUITE 218 Testing SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92128 Laboratories (61 9) 486-0354 COVERING WORK PERFORMED OREINFORCED CONCRETE OSTRUCT. STEEL ASSEMBLY WHICH REOUIRED APPROVAL BY 0PRE.STRESSEDCONCRETE OREINFORCED GYPSUM 0GLUE.LAM.FABRICATION THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF OREINFORCED MASONRY OPlLE DRIVING DOTHER JOB ADDRESS 1812 Aston Avenue Mix #355 5 1/2 Sk W/POZZ Arthur Serata & Associates 3,000 psi Gene Chapo & Associates Reinforced Concrete 900566 Cobra Golf ENDING No. 90-292 Wyman Testing Laboratories Grade 60 MQ Czlstruction Reinforcinq Steel ASTM #6 & Larger MQ Construct ion FOR WEEK OWNER OR PROJECT NAME BLDG. PERMlT NO. 12-7 19 ge PLAN FILE NO. CONSTR. MAT'L (TYPE.GRADE.ETC.1 ARCHITECT OESIGN STRENGTH SOURCE OR MFGR. ENGINEER super ior DESCRIBE MAT'L. (MIX DESIGN. RB-BAR GRADE e MFGR.1 DENERALCONTHACTOR CONTR. DOSWG HCPOH1 L.0 WORK " ~ LAB RECEIVING LL TESTING CONSTR. MAT% SAMPLES I INSpN. identity numbers of test samples taken; structural connections (welds made, h.t. bolts torqued) checked; etc. DATE REMARKS, ETC., Includes information about amounts of material placed or work performed; number. type, and LOCATIONS OF WORK INSPECTED, TEST SAMPLES TAKEN, WORK REJECTED, JOB PROBLEMS, PROGRESS, . CONCRETE INSPECTION 12-1 per details 3 and 20 on sheet S13-A of approved drawings. and clearance. Inspected the reinforcing steel installation for grade beams Inspected reinforcing steel for size, grade, lap, locations, Verified member dimensions with inplace formwork. Verified dimensions of excavated locations. Checked locations of embedded items and sleeves. Inspected the placement and consolidation of 7 1/2 cubic yards of concrete, mix design # 355 in the following locations: grade beam on line 4 between G and FI. Concrete supplied by Superior Ready Mix. Truck #530. slump test results 4". Work inspected is in accordance with the approved specifications and plans per UBC. CERTIFICATION OFCOMPLIANCE A, e-', I HEHEQY CERTIFY TtlAT I HAVE INSPECTEII ALl. OF THE ABOVE IIEPOHTED WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTEU I IIAVE FOIJNOTHIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS SPECIFICATIONS.& APPLICAELESECTIONS OF THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO BUILDING LAWS. Wyman Testing Laboratories COVERING WORK PERFORMED nRElNFORCEDCONCRETE WHICH REOUIRED APPROVAL BY OPRE-STRESSEDCONCRETE 13230 EVENING CREEK DRIVE SOUTH, SUITE 218 SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92128 (619) 486-0354 THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF OREINFORCED MASONRY OPILE DRIVING OOTHER OB ADDRESS 1812 Aston Avenue Cobra Golf FOR WEEK No. 90-202 ENDING 11-30 '9 9 >WNER OR PROJECT NAME BLOC.. PERMlT NO. PLAN FILE NO, :ONSTR. MAT'L (TYPE.GRADE.ETC.1 ARCHITECT >ES1GN STRENGTH SOURCE OR MFGR. ENGlNEER Gene Chappo IESCRIBE MAT'L. (MIX DESIGN. RE-BAR GRADE a MFGR.1 ASTM A615 A706 Grade 60 A36 A307 GENERALCONTRACTOR "_ ~. - MQ CONTH. DOiNC REPOHTED WORK MQ Wyman Testing Laboratories LAB RECEIVING TESTING CONSTR. MAT'L SAMPLES ." I - REMARKS, ETC., Includes information about amounts of material placed or work performed; number, type, and LOCATIONS OF WORK INSPECTED, TEST SAMPLES TAKEN, WORK REJECTED, JOB PROBLEMS, PROGRESS, OATE identity numbers of test samples taken; structural connections (welds made. h.t. bolts torqued) checked; etc. Wyman 13230 EVENING CREEK DRIVE SOUTH, SUITE 218 Testing SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92128 Laboratories (619) 486-0354 WHICH REOVIREO APPROVAL BY UPRE-STRESSEOCONCRETE OREINFORCED GYPSUM flGLUE-LAM~FARRl~ATlnN COVERING WORK PERFORMED nRElNFORCEDCONCRETE OSTRUCT. STEEL ASSEMBLY . 11-30 REINFORCING STEEL VERIFICATION panels per details noted on sheet S2.1 of approved drawings. N10, 11, S3, 6, 7, 8, 9, E7, 8. and clearance. Inspected the reinforcing steel instalLation for tilt up Inspected the reinforcing steel instalLation o€ panels # Inspected reinforcing steel for size, grade, lap, locations, Verified member dimensions with inpLace formwork. Chccked locations of embedded items and slccvcs. Verified dimensions of excavated locations. Work inspected is in accordance with the approved plans. \ CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE t4EPORTED WORK, UNL.tSS OTHERWISE NOTE[) I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVE0 PLANS SPECIFICATIONS,& APPLICABLESECTIONS OF THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO BUILDING LAWS. :1; 8% c.., (,.I DATE OF REPORT REGISTER NUMBCR .. . . .. a LUI le5 Wyman 13230 EVENING CREEK DRIVE SOUTH, SUITE 218 Testing SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92128 Labor-&--:-- (61 9) 486-0354 COVERING WORK PERFORMED OREINFORCED CONCRETE OSTRUCT. STEEL ASSEMBLY ~ ~ ~ ~~~ WHICH REOUIRED APPROVAL BY UPRE-STRESSED CONCRETE OREINFORCED GYPSUM nGLUE.LAM.FABRICATI0. 1 - . - - - - - THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF OREINFORCED MASONRY OPlLE DRIVING . ~~~~~ UOTHER 7 SK Miu nesinn 67 7/R" neil grarrc.1 Mn Pnnstmrtinn LAB RECEIVING (L TESTING CONSTR. MAT.L SAMPLLS 1 P9 I NSP'N. identity numbers of test samples taken; structural connections (welds made, h.t. bolts torqued) checked: etc. OATE REMARKS, ETC., Includes information about amounts of material placed or work performed; number, type, and LOCATIONS OF WORK INSPECTED, TEST SAMPLES TAKEN, WORK REJECTED, JOB PROBLEMS, PROGRESS, CONCRETE INSPECTION 11-28 Inspected the reinforcing steel installation for caissons and grade beams per details 8 on ,515 and detail 3 on sheet 513 and attached clarification from Serata & Associates for caisson D on line 8. and clearance. Inspected reinforcing steel for size, grade, lap, locations, Verified member dimensions with inplace formwork. Verified dimensions of excavated locations. Checked locations of embedded items and sleeves. Inspected the placement and consolidation of 19 cubic yards of concrete, mix design # 67 in the following locations: caissons F and G on line 6 and caisson D on line 8. of concrete, mix design #541245 in the following locations: grade Inspected the placement and consolidation of 13 cubic yards beam on line 6 between F and G and grade beam between F and E line 8. One set of 4 test cylinders taken from bottom half of caisson F on line 6. Slump test results 5". Concrete supplied by Escondido Ready Mix (Superior). Ticket Work inspected is in accordance with the approved plans and #1284243, truck #292. saecifications Der UBC. / & . CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE / .' ,;7 -7 - I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS OF REOlSTERED SNSPECTOR WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS SPECIFICATIONS,& APPLICABLESECTIDNS OF THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO BUILDING LAWS. ' DATE OF REPORT '1. k, , li 1' ZC&/ 6'Y-3K? k '9- fJ REGlSTEk NUMgER Wyman 13230 EVENING CREEK DRIVE SOUTH, SUITE 218 Tectinn SAN DIEGO. CALIFORNIA 92128 OSTRUCT. STEEL A!X3EMBLY (619) 486-0354 GLUE-LAM.FABRICATION ., Includes information about amounts of material placed or work performed; number, type, and WELDING INSPECTION 11-27 Visually inspected the field welding and repair of 12 each #18 rebar connections in the following locations: at lines H4 and G4. Carbon equivalent is .63% requiring 280O F preheat as per table 5.2 of AWS D1.4. Certified welders were observed for proper welding procedures and techniques. Completed welds were inspected for size, length, location, and unless otherwise noted are free of visible defects and in accordance with the approved plans and engineers sketch per AWS. CERTIFICATION OFCOMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS . WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS SPECIFICATIONS.& APPLICABLESECTIONS OF THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO BUILDING LAWS. /~-?.7 DATE OF REPORT - 40 L REGISTER NUMBER Wyman 13230 EVENING CREEK DRIVE SOUTH, SUITE 218 Testing SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92128 Laboratories (619) 486-0354 COVERING WORK PERFORMED OREINFORCED CONCRETE OSTRUCT. STEEL ASSEMBLY WHICH REOUIRED APPROVAL BY OPRESTRESSEDCONCRETE OREINFORCED GYPSUM OGLUE.LAM.FABRICATION THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF OREINFORCED MASONRY OPlLE DRIVING OOTHER I De ADDRESS 1812 Aston Avenue Carlsbad CoEbra GOE, Inc. 11 Ple~nForcLJ Concr'efe 3,000 psi Re%ar A6?ib Graa"e"';SeOBA~tiR~D~p~~~~de 40 or 50 #5 & down MQ Constructlon FOR WEEK IWN R OR PRO1 T NAME No. 90-292 ENDING 11-30 19 9c BLDG. PeRMlT NO. 900560 PLAN PILE NO. NSTR. AT'L T PEGRADEE C.1 ARCHITECT Gene Chapo Associates J. L. Davidson Art%ur Serata & Associates €SIGN STRENGTH SOURCE OR MFGR. ENGlN ER ESC IBE MAT' MIX DES GENERALCONTRACTOV CONTR. DOING REPORTED WQRK Western Foundatlon & Shoring Wyman Testing Laboratories LAB RECEIVING e TESTING CONSTR. MATL SAMPLES REMARKS, ETC., Includes information about amounts of material placed or work performed; number, type, and LOCATIONS OF WORK INSPECTED, TEST SAMPLES TAKEN, WORK REJECTED, JOB PROBLEMS, PROGRESS, DATE identity numbers of test samples taken; structural connections (welds made, h.t. bolts torqued) checked; etc. CONCRETE INSPECTION 11-26 caissons per details 1 on sheet 513 and 8 on sheet S 15 of Inspected the reinforcing steel installation for 4 each approved drawings. Inspected reinforcing steel for size, grade, lap, locations, and clearance. Inspected the placement and consolidation of 19 cubic yards of concrete, mix design # 7 SK 3/8 pump, code 67 in the following locations at grid lines 7.8F, 7.2F, DE, D7. One set of 4 test cylinders taken from 7.8F. Slump test results 4". Concrete supplied by Escondido Ready Mix. Ticket #213885, Work inspected is in accordance with the approved plans and truck #531. specifications per UBC. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUNDTHIS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS SPECIFICATIONS.& APPLICABLESECTIONS OF THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO BUILDING LAWS. / ...- A6 -YO x9 -333?J-"7$ DATE OF REPORT REGOSTER NUMBER ,. . . .. '. ;. .. I. . Wyman .. 13230 Evening Creek Drive South Suite 218 San Diego, California 92128 Testing Laboratories ffi.19) 486-0354 ~ ~~ COVERING WORK PERFORMED OREINFORCED CONCRETE . OSTRUCT. STEEL ASSEMBLY WHICH REOVIREO APPROVAL BY nPRE.STRESSE0 CONCRETE nRElNFORCE0 GYPSUM nGLuE.LAM.FABRlcATloN THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF flRElNFORCE0 MASONRY UPlLE DRIVING 38 ADDRESS I30THER 1812 Aston 90-292 ENDING 11-9 Cobra Golf 1s 90 POH WEEK WNER OR PROJECT NAME BLDG. PERMrT NO. 900566 eene yhaoo PLAN FlLE NO. A CHlTE ESlGN STRENGTH f'c 3000 psi Escondido Ready Mix ASTM c-1.40 Type 11 Cement CR~bms@rucCtlSn fonstrucflon ; ENGINEER 85CRILBE MAT'L. MIX DBSIGN. RE.BAR GRADE & hIFGR.1 ER LCONTRAC OR ODlN REP RT OWORH ~v~"n"I~eGs~~~S~I~a~~STR. MAT'L SAMPL.ES 11-8 CONCRETE INSPECTION of concrete, mix design # 5412451 in the following locations: Inspected the placement and consolidation of 13 cubic yards pad footing at line E at line 6.8 and south radius wall footings. One set of 4 test cylinders taken from pad footing at line E at line 6.8. slump test results 4". Concrete supplied by Escondido Ready Mix. Ticket # 128220, truck # 221. the UBC. Work inspected is in accordance wit.h the approed plans and 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 1 HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE REPORTED WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS SPECIFICATIONS,& APPLICABLESECTIONS OF THE CITY OF SAN OlEGO BUILDING LAWS. 13230 EVENING CREEK DRIVE SOUTH, SUITE 218 SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92128 (61 9) 486-0354 11-26 Inspected the reinforcing steel installation for 4 each caissons located at 7.8F, 7.2F, D8, D7 per details 1 on sheet 513 and 8 on sheet 515 also general notes on sheet S1 of approved drawings. Inspected reinforcing steel. for size, grade, lap, locations, and clearance. Work inspected is in accordance with the approved plans and specifications per UBC. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE Wyman Testing Laboratories COVERING WORK PERFORMED OREINFORCED CONCRETE 38 ADDRESS 1812 Aston Avenue Carlsbad NO. 90-292 ENDING 11-30 *s 9( Cobra Golf, Inc. I1 Reinyorced eoncr'ete 3,000 psi Rebar A615 Grade 60 #6 & up, Gdade 40 MQ Construction or 50, 85 & down Western Foundation & Shoring Wyman Testing Laboratories FOR WEEK WNER OR PROJECT NAME BLDG. PERMlT NO. PLAN FlLE NO. 900560 Gene Chapo Associates DNSTR. AT'L (TYPE GRADE ETC.) ARCMITECT ESIGN STRENGTH SOURCE OR MFGR. ENOONEER 3. L. Davidson Arthur Serata & Associates CSCRlBE MAT'L. (MIX DESIGN. RE-BAR GRADE C. MFGR. GENERALCONTRACTOR CONTR. DOlNG REPORTED WORK LA8 RECEIVING k TESTING CONSTR. MAT'L SAM?LE8 I NSP'N. DATE REMARKS, ETC., Includes information about amounts of material placed or work performed; number, type, and LOCATIONS OF WORK INSPECTED, TEST SAMPLES TAKEN, WORK REJECTED, JOB PROBLEMS, PROGRESS, identity numbers of test samples taken; structural connections (welds made, h.t. bolts torqued) checked; etc. REINFORCING STEEL VERIFICATION Wyman Testing 13230 EVENING CREEK DRIVE SOUTH, SUITE 218 SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92128 Laboratories (61 9) 486-0354 COVERING WORK PERFORMED OREINFORCED CONCRETE OSTRUCT. STEEL ASSEMBLY . 1 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTE0 I HAVE FOUNDTHIS SlGNAf6Re OF REGISTERED INSPECTOR WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS SPECIFICATIONS,& APPLICABLESECTIONS OF THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO BUILDING LAWS. Y - 26 -90 539-93395-86 DATE OF REPORT REGISTER NUMBER 13230 EVENING CREEK DRIVE SOUTH, SUITE 218 SAN DIEGO. CALIFORNIA 92128 (619) 486-0354 I WHICH REOUIRED APPROVAL BY OPRE-STRESSEDCONCRETE OREINFORCED GYPSUM OGLUE-LAM.FABRICATION THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF OREINFORCED MASONRY OPILE DRIVING OOTHER JOB ADDRESS 1812 Aston Rd. Cobra Golf FOR WEEK No. 90-292 ENDONG 11-23 19 9 OWNER OR PROJECT NAME BLDG. PERMIT NO. 900566 CEaavo & Associates PLAN FILE NO. CONSTR. MAT'L 1TYPE.GRADE.ETC.I ARC vmcr DESIGN STRENGTH SOURCE OR MFGR. .. ENGlNEER - DESCRIBE MAT'L. (MIX DESIGN. RE-BAR GRADE B; MFGR.1 Serata & Associates GENERALCONTRACTOR " " M @ -___ CONTR. DDlNC REPORTED WORK LAB RECEIVING (L TESTING CONSTR. MAT'L SAMPLES Western Foundation Wyman Testing Labs -. .." . .. . - ." REMARKS, ETC., Includes information about amounts of material placed or work performed; number, type, and I REINFORCING STEEL VERIFICATION 11-21 per details 1 on sheet S3A of approved drawings. and clearance. Inspected the reinforcing steel installation forcaissons, Inspected reinforcing steel for size, grade, lap, locations, VeriEied member dimensions with inplace formwork. Verified dimensions of excavated locations. Checked locations of embedded items and sleeves. Work inspected is not in accordance with the plans. Note: Re-inspection set for Monday, November 26, 1990. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE REPORTED WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUNDTHIS RE OF REGlSTERED INSPECTOR WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS SPECIFICATIONS. L3 APPLICABLESECTIONS OF THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO BUILDING LAWS. 6ATE OF REPORT YI (15'2 R<tk?TER NUMBER Wyman Testing Laboratories 13230 EVENING CREEK DRIVE SOUTH, SUITE 218 SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92128 (61 9) 486-0354 COVERING WORK PERFORMED OREINFORCED CONCRETE OSTRUCT. STEEL ASSEMBLY ~ ~ ~~ WHICH REQUIRED APPROVAL BY UPRE-STRESSED CONCRETE nRElNFORCE0 GYPSUM flGLUE-LAM.FABRICATION THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF OREINFORCED MASONRY nPlLE DRIVING OOTHER JOB ADDRESS 1812 Aston Rd. FOR WEEK NO. 9 OWNER OR PROJECT NAME BLDG. PERMlT NO. 90-292 ENDING - 19 Cobra Golf PLAN FlLE NO. ARcwmEcr 900566 RK INSPECTED, TEST SAMPL REJECTED, JOB PRO I 11-20 CONCRETE INSPECTION Inspected the reinforcing steel installation for caissons - 1 at 8 line between F & E - per details 1 on sheet S13A of approved drawings. ~~ Inspected ieinforcing steel for size, grade, lap, locations, and clearance. Verified member dimensions with inplace €ormwork. Verified dimensions of excavated locations. Checked locations of embedded items and sleeves. Inspected the placement and consolidation of 7.5 cubic yards of concrete, mix design # 67 in the €oll.owing locations: 2 caissons, 8 line at F & E. Slump test results 3 1/2". One set of 4 test cylinders taken €rom caisson (west). truck # 174. Concrete supplied by Escondido Ready Mix. Ticket # 1283492, Work inspected is in accordance with the approved plans. CERTIFICATION OFCOMPLIANCE n \ r).II- dl, I HEHEBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE UAA?O\ \a' (,u GQ+" HEPORTED WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUNDTHIS #IONIT*. OF REGETERE? 0,NSPECTOR WORK TO COMPLY Wll-tl .THE APPROVED PLANS SPECIFICATIONS.& I\- 20 .. ')(\ APPLICAHLESECTIONS OF THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO HlllLDlNG LAWS. DATE OF R1EPORT REGISTER NUMBER . .. .. Wyman Testing 13230 EVENING CREEK DRIVE SOUTH, SUITE 218 SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92128 (61 9) 486-0354 WHICH REOUIRED APPROVAL BY OPRE.STRESSEDCONCRETE OREINFORCED GYPSUM ~GLUE.LAM,F~R.~F~~~~~ 1 Laboratories t COVERING WORK PERFORMED OREINFORCED CONCRETE OSTRUCT. STEEL ASSEMBLY THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF OREINFORCED MASONRY OPILE DRIVING OOTHER JOB ADDRESS 1812 Aston Cobra Golf Course FOR WEEK No. 90-292 ENDING 11-23 OWNER OR PROJECT NAME '9 9L ELDG. PERMlT NO. PLAN FILE NO. CONSTR. MAT'L 1TYPE.GRADE.ETC.J ARCHITECT 900566 Gene Chappo Architects Arthur Serata DESIGN STRENGTH SOURCE OR MFGR. ENGINEER DESCRIBE MAT'L. (MIX DESIGN. RE-BAR GRADE LL b4FGR.I ASTM A615 Gr. 60 GENERALCONTRACTOR CONTR. DOING REPORTED WORK MQ LAB RECEIVING 0 TESTING CONSTR. MAT'L SAMPLES Wyman Testing Labs REMARKS, ETC., Includes information about amounts of material placed or work performed; number, type, and LOCATIONS OF WORK INSPECTED, TEST SAMPLES TAKEN, WORK REJECTED, JOB PROBLEMS, PROGRESS, OATE identity numbers of test samples taken; structural connections (welds made, h.t. bolts torqued) checked; etc. REINFORCING STEEL VERIFICATION 11-19 Inspected the reinforcing steel installation for caisson cages only at line F between 7 L 8; 8 between E L F. Dowel steel to bolts still needs to he installed and a reinsDection CERTIFICATION OFCOMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUNDTHIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS SPECIFICATIONS,& APPLICABLESECTIONS OF THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO BUILDING LAWS. DATE OF REPORT I\ .I Wyman Testing 13230 EVENING CREEK DRIVE SOUTH, SUITE 218 SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92128 Laboratories (61 9) 486-0354 COVERING WORK PERFORMED OREINFORCED CONCRETE OSTRUCT. STEEL ASSEMBLY - 0 - - - - - - - - - - _I d details 8 on sheet S-15A of approved drawings. and clearance. Inspected the reinforcing steel installation for caisson per Inspected reinforcing steel for size, grade, lap, locations, Verified member dimensions with inplace formwork. Verified dimensions of excavated locations. Checked locations of embedded items and sleeves. Inspected the placement and consolidation of 2 cubic yards of concrete, mix design # 83-146 in the following locations: 13-4. One se.t of 4 test cylinders taken from H-4, 2nd pour. Slump test results 3". Concrete supplied by Escondido Ready Mix. Ticket.# 1282605, truck # 481. Work inspected is in accordance with the approval of engineer. complete placement of concrete at caisson H-4, fax to follow. Noted: Verbal approval from engineer has been given to WHICH REOUIRED APPROVAL BY OPREsTRESSED CONCRETE OREINFORCED GYPSUM OGLUE.LAM,FABRICATION THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF OREINFORCED MASONRY OPILE DRIVING OOTHER OB ADDRESS 1812 Aston Avenue Cobra Golf ENDING No. 90-292 FOR WBES 8WNER OR PROJECT NAME 11-16 19 BLDG PERMlT NO, 400566 PLAN FILE NO. ONSTR. MAT'L ITVPE.GRADE.ETC.I ARCMITSCT ESlGN STRENGTH Gene Chappo 3000 psi Escondido Ready Mix Arthur Serata SOURCE OR MFGR. ENGINEER ESCRIBE MAT'L. (MIX DESIGN, RE-BAR GRADE LL MFGR.) GENERALCONTRACTOR un CONTR. DOING REPORTED WORK "V LAB RECEIVING (L TESTING CONSTR. MAT'L SAMPLCS Western Foundation Wyman Testing Labs I NSP'N' identity numbers of test Samples taken; structural connections (welds made, h.t. bolts torqued) checked; etc. DATE REMARKS, ETC., Includes information about amounts of material placed or work performed; number, type, and LOCATIONS OF WORK INSPECTED, TEST SAMPLES TAKEN, WORK REJECTED, JOB PROBLEMS, PROGRESS, ~. ." CONCRETE INSPECTION 11-12 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS SPECIFICATIONS,& REPORTED WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS I 51 NATURE OF REGISTERED INSPECTOR APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO BUILDING LAWS. DATE OF REPORT REGlSTCR NUMBER \\ \\&o clI?,52 .. . Wyman 13230 Evenlng Creek Drive South Testing ,Suite Z! It1 San Diego, Calilornia 92128 Laboratories (619) 486-0354 COVERING WORK PERFORMED flRElNFOHCED CONCRETE . flSTRUCT. STEEL ASSEMBLY WHICH REOLJIRED APPROVAL BY OWE-STRESSED CONCRETE flRElNFORCED GYPSUM ~GLUE.~AM.~A~R~CAT~~~ THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF flRElNFORCE0 MASONRY OPlLE DRIVING nDlHER .IOU ADDRESS 1812 Aston Avenue Carlsbad Cobra Golf ENDING 11-9 1s 90 No. 90-292 #'OH WCEH OWNER On PllOJECT NAIAC OLDG. PEllMlT NO. 900566 Gene Chapporone ASSOC. Escondido Ready Mix Arthur Serata 6, Assoc. PLAII FILE NO. CONSTR. MAT*L (TYPE.GRADE.ETC.] ARCHITBCT DLSIGN STRENGTH SOURCE Ora MFGR. 3000 psi ENGlNEEn DESCRIDE MAT'L. (MIX DESIGN. RE-BAR GRADE (L LIFGR.I GENERALCONTRACTOR MQ Western Foundation Wyman Testing Lags CONTR. DOING REPOR ED WORK LAB RECEIVING e TESTING c NSTR.MAT.LSAMCLES 11-9 CONCRETE INSPECTION per details 8 on sheets S-15A 1/S-l3A (1.5 at €1) of approved Inspected the reinforcing steel installation for caissons drawings. Inspected reinforcing steel for size, grade, lap, locations, and clearance. Verified member dimensions with inplace formwork. Verified dimensions of excavated locations. Checked locations of embedded items and sleeves. Inspected the placement and consolidation of 15 cubic yards of concrete, mix design # 83-146 in the following locations: M-4, G-4, 1.5-H. One set of 4 test cylinders taken from H-4. Slump test Concrete supplied by Escondido Ready Mix. Ticket # 1282433, Work inspected is in accordance with the approved plans. NOTE: Caisson at 11-4 is only approximately 75% placed due to age of concrete and extreme dark condition. Contractor elects to stop pour. Anticipate completion after engineers approval of cold joint. results 3". truck # 282. I I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE REPORTED WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUNDTHIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS SPECIFICATIONS,& APPLICABLESECTIONS OF THE CITY OF SAN OIEGO BUILDING LAWS. DATE OF RCPOIIT IGNATURE OF REGISTERCO INSPECTOR \\ 9s 1% 1 qsa REGISTER NUMllER 11-2 CONCRETE INSPECTION per details 7, 8, 18 on sheet 513 and detail 13 on sheet S15 of Inspected the reinforcing steel installation €or Eootings approved drawings. Inspected reinforcing steel for size, grade, lap, locations, and clearance. Verified memlJer dimensions with inplace Eormwork. Verified dimensions of excavated locations. Checked locations of embedded items and sleeves. yards ol concrete, mix design # 5412451 in the following Inspected the placement and consolidation of 47.5 cubic locations: radius footing between grid line 4 L 6 (K to H), line (K.3). slump test results 4 1./2". Concrete supplied by Escondido Ready Mix. Ticket # 349908. specifications except that footings placed this date were not Work inspected is in accordance with approved plans and placed monolithic with slab on grade as shown on details. Contractor said engineer is sending paper stating that this is all right. WORK TO COMPLY WITbI 1IiE APPROVED PI.ANS SPECIFICATIONS,& APPLICABLESECTIONS OF WE CITY OF SAN I1II:GO tIIIII.OING LAWS. II-" DATL <>I' IKLPDII7 tacGtGTcn NUMUE~ WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES 13230 Evenlng Creek Dr. San Dlego, CA 92128 Sulte 218 (619) 486-0354 __ REPORT OF COMPRESSION TESTS PROJECT raggAGar.a PROJECT NO. 90-292 'PROJECT ADDRESS " APr.sann CONTRACTOR MO ARCHITECT/ENGINEER -a-SSQC" TO BE BILLED BRW-T - BLDG. PERMIT NO. 9 0- 0_54_6_- PLAN FILE NO. .~ NII ." " . "" _" -. SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF I CONCRETE n MORTAR 0 GROUT 0 OTIHER -. - - .... SUPPLIER ~._~~c.oNDIDo~~.R~A.DY MIX .. PLACEMENT DATE 03-&-31 .- ........ MIX DESCRIPTION - .-.6__SACK .... ... .I ICKET NUMIIER _.-?..%683.0 . - .... MIX NUMBER 355 . .... 1IMEINMlXER 45 MI-& SLUMP 5 " ADMIXTURE .-L I1 NfA TYPE CEMENT __ ~- AIR CONTENT . N/A UNIT WEIGHT N/A - DESIGN STRENGTH _. 3000 LOCATION OF PLACEMENT CAST IN PLACE WALL AT LINE K @ 5 ~_____ . " .. SPECIAL TEST INSTRUCTION OR REMARKS .. REQUIRED STRENGTH (t'c) - SAMPL S MADE BY - 3000 .~ . _. .. PSI AT 28 DAYS 7 NARVAEZ1 J!!bATE RECEIVED IN LAB 03-18-91 / LABORATORY DATA I / LAB FIELD CONTHOL DATE DIMENSIONS IDENTITY NUMBER TESTED INCHES I> - 7 93 03-22-9k 6 X 12 28 94 04-12-9 L 6 X 12 -. 28 95 04-12-9 L 6 X 12 ____ .~ "" . .... " , , ........... -__-~ .... "" TEST AREA COMPRESSIVE MAX LOAD SO INCHES STRENGTH POUNDS ~.. - ...... 20.27 .... 67,500 - 20.27 114,000 - " " .- .. 20.27 115,000 " . "_ "" .. LABORATORY DATA REMARKS ____ . " . ." "_ ....... DISTRIBUTION - ." REVIEWED BY: ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH DATE q:L23?L ASTM STANDARD DESIGNATIONS C31-69. C39-80, C78-75. C617-76 WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES 13230 Evening Creek Dr. Suite 21 8 San Dlego. CA 92128 (61 e) 486-0354 REPORT OF COMPRESSION TESTS PROJECT coE$RAsQu PROJECT NO. 90-292 PROJECT ADDRESS 18 12-ASi-QN-&YENE,"ARLSBAD CONTRACTOR MQ CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT/ENGINEER GENEAHAPO ASSOC- 1 ... SEROTA ti &ssoc* TO BE BILLED BLDG. P.ERMlT NO. 90-0566 PLAN FILE NO. N /A BRUCE McDONALD CONSTRUCTION MGT. SAMPLE DATA REPORTOF CONCRETE OMORTAR OGROUT OOTHER -___ "" SUPPLIER MIX DESCRIPTION ... 5 ......... " ... " TICKET NUMBER ... 216509 .. - .. . SACK MIX NUMBER .... TIME IN MIXEN ~__ .____ 30 MIN ~ SLUMP ." 3-112" . ADMIXTURE ~ NIA t. ' " . ESCoNDIDo READY . PLACEMENT DATE 03-07-91 3 55 ........ ..... .- TYPE CEMENT ~- .. AIR CONTENT ... NIA I1 UNIT WEIGHT ____ NIA 3000 .... LOCATION OF PLACEMENT - -. - ~~ ...... DESIGN STRENGTI-I ~_____ ... BATHROOM WALL AT EAST END ~. ~ ..... ..... """ ... " ...... " .... - "~ SPECIAL TEST INSTRUCTION OR REMARKS " .... -. REQUIRED STRENGTH (t'c) SAMPLES MADE BY DATE RECEIVED IN LAB 3000 2 8- PSI AT -__ DAYS - LACK 03-11-91 LABORATORY DATA .__. LAR FIELD IDENTITY NUMBER TESTED INCHES CONTMOL DATE DIMENSIONS . . /F/-i""~I 03-14-91 6 X 12 04-04-91 6 X 12 __ -__ 04-04-91 6 X 12 - " i*l __ ." -. .... LABORATORY DATA REMARKS - " - TEST AREA SQ INCHES 28.27 28.27 ". ........ - .. " COMPRESSIVE MAX LOAD STHENGTH POUNDS . PSI 75, OOd 2650 1 .. 133 1 OOd 4700 28.27 132, OOC 4670 ." - ~~ ~~ ....... " ........ - .~ - ........ .- -____.. ~~ . . ~ . - ...... " __ .......... DISTRIBUTION . __~ ..... .____ "" ~ - ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH DATE I" '-'/ ASTM STANDARD DESIGNATIONS C31-69. C39-80, C78-75. C617-76 WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES 13230 Evenlny Croek Dr. SUI10 218 San Diego, CA 92128 (61 9) 466-0354 PROJECT COBPA GOLJ PROJECT ADDRESS CONTRACTOR ARCHITECTENGINEER TO BE BILLED -~__ __~ BLDG. PERMIT NO. _.__ - GENE CHAPo 90-0566 - PLAN FILE NO. - ' READY PLACEMENT DATE 0 GROUT 0 OTHER .. " 02-21-91 . .- - ....... EO MIN -. ME IN MIXEII . REPORT OF CONCSETE 0 MORTAR SUPPLIER - ~ ~ ~ ESCONDIDC MIX DESCRIPTION N/A TICKET NUMIlEn .... 1292599 MIX NUMBER SLUMP TYPE CEMENT UNIT WEIGHT LOCATION OF PLACEMENT - 54-12451 .. 4-3/4" N/A .. ADMIXTURE .... N/A N/A I1 AIR CONTENT ._ - _ ~ DESIGN STRENGTH 3000 FOOTING LINE 3 @ J " . ...... ..... " " ....... SPECIAL TEST INSTRUCTION OR REMARKS ~~ .. "" - ..... 3000 .. REQUIRED STRENGTH (l'c) -JOIIN-POWEL~ PSI AT DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY 2o .... 02-22-91 - ~. DATE RECEIVED IN LAB . LABORATORY DATA LA8 FIELD IDENTITY NUMOER TESTED .. INCHES CONT~IOL DATE DIMENSIONS TEST AREA . sa INCHES 28.27 ." " ~.__ .~ ." 03-07-9 ..... 6 X 12 COMPRESSIVE MAX LOAD STRENGTH POUNDS PSI 68, 0001"- 2310 I ... " I .. LABORATORY DATA REMARKS - .. .. ... . - . ". -. ... - __ DISTRIBUTION . ........ ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH DATE ~3127-p/ ASTM STANDARD DESIGNATIONS C31-69. C39-80, C78-75. 0317-76 WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES 13230 Evenlng Creek Dr. San Dlego, CA 92128 Suite 21 8 (61 9) 486-0354 - REPORT OF COMPRESSION TESTS PROJECT PROJECT ADDRESS 18-------~ ~~~ ~. 90-292 -" - -- ~~ ~ PROJECT NO. " CONTRACTOR __ MO CmSmK- .... ARCHlTECTlENGlNEER SEmOASSOCIA1% $S TO BE BILLED ___ BLDG. PERMIT NO. 90-0566 -. PLAN FILE NO. ._ CB 90 566 . ". - -. - ". . ........ ~~ _" - - SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF WCONCRETE 0 MORTAR 0 GROUT 0 OTHER . . SUPPLIER ___ CALMAT MIX DESCRIPTION N.!?. ...... ~. .. ~ ....... ~.~- ... TICKET NUMREll ............ 565511 MIX NUMBEO ..... ~. SLUMP ~~ ADMIXTURE CAL.CHL.,DARAKAIR,MESH -. PLACEMENT DKTE 02-04-91 "_ C-940E0F F1"ER MESH . TIME IN MIXER . 30 MIN "- .... a tt TYPE CEMENT UNIT WEIGHT ~.~.___ LOCATION OF PLACEMENT __ I1 . AIR CONTENl- . N/A N/A ~. DESIGN STRENGTH 3000 2ND FLOOR FRAMING LINE 5.5 @ J.5 .~ . ". ~ - " .... SPECIAL TEST INSTRUCTION OR REMARKS ". .. .~ ~" ...... REQUIRED STRENGTH (f'c) - SAMPLES MADE BY . 3000 -. -~ 28 .. DAK-RAMAGE PSI AT DAYS - DATE RECEIVED IN LAB 02-05-91 ~- LABORATORY DATA - .~ I.AIP IDENTllFY NUMBER TESTED INCHES SO INCHES POUNDS PSI " FIELD CON I'lIOL OIMENSIONS TEST AREA MAX LOAD COMPRESSIVE DATE STRENGTH - 7 81 02-11-91 65,000 28.27 6 X 12 03-04-91 82 28 1610 45,500 28.27 6 X 12 -. . - 2300 65, OOC 28.27 6 X 12 03-04-91 83 28 2300 . " - 56 04-01-91 84 ". - 2410 68,000 28.27 - 6 X 12 " ~- -" .. ~- ~ . __~. . " .- ". . .- .. . .- .. - -~ ...... __ .... LABORATORY DATA REMARKS -." I"..... ........ . ~__ DISTRIBUTION a&- REVIEWED BY ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCr WITH DATE -3-7 91 ASTM STANDARD DESIGNATIONS C31-69. C39-80, C78-75. C617-76 WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES 13230 Evenlng Croek Dr. Snn Dlogo. CA 92128 Sulle 21U (619) ~OG-O~M REPORT OF COMPRESSION TESTS PROJECT PROJECT ADDRESS ______. 1.812 ASlON AVENUE, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR ARCHITECT/ENGINEER TO BE BILLED BLDG. PERMIT NO. COBRA GOLF PROJECT NO. 90-292 - MQ CONSTRUCTION GENE CIII\po ASSOCIATES ". - 90-0566 PLAN FILE NO. SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF CONCREZE SUPPLIER PLACEMENT DATE MIX DESCRIPTION TICKET NUMBER MIX NUMBER SLUMP TYPE CEMENT UNIT WEIGHT LOCATION OF PLACEMENT c~&O~'I~~~RFA%Y%~IP OTHER mJB N/A m 54-12451 3 'I N/A TIME IN MIXER ADMIXTURE AIR CONTENT DESIGN STRENGTH 60 MIN N/A N/A I1 3000 FOOTING FOR TRUCK RAMP ALONG I)-LINE - SPECIAL TEST INSTRUCTION OR REMARKS " -0110 28 REQUIRED STRENGTH (PC) ____ SAMPLES MADE BY DATE RECEIVED IN LAB JOSEPI1 PISLLACK PSI AT DAYS 12-24-90 LABORATORY DATA LAR FIELD CONTROL DATE DIMENSIONS MAX LOAD STRENGTH IDENTITY NUMBER TESTED TEST AREA INCHES SQ INCHES POUNDS COMPRESSIVE F,br-27-9&71 64,000 1 5: 1 111-17-9 6 X 12 117,000 28 75 01-17-9 6 X 12 28.27 118,000 4170 - LABORATORY DATA IREMARKS ~~~ ~~ DlSTRlDUTlON __I_ ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM STANDARD DESIGNATIONS C31-69. '230-80, C78-75. C617-76 ., . , WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES 13230 Evenlng Creek Dr. Sulte 218 San Dlego, CA 92128 (619) 486-0354 REPORT OF COMPRESSION TESTS PROJECT PROJECT ADDRESS CONTRACTOR ARCHlTECTlENGlNEER - TO QE BILLED BLDG. PERMIT NO. COBRA GOLF __ PROJECT NO. 90-292 1.81.2 ASlON AVENUE, CARISBAD, CALIFORNIA NQ CONSTRUCTION GENE CHAPO ASSOCIATES " - 90-0566 PLAN FILE NO. CB9"-566 SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF H CONCRE&E SUPPLIER MIX DESCRIPTION ~ TICKET NUMBER MIX NUMBER SLUMP TYPE CEMENT UNIT WEIGHT LOCATION OF PLACEMENT CE&%~~~R~~BB~NIX~ OTHER 5.5 SACK PLACEMENT DATE " 128614'1 8" 4 '. 11 N/A TIME IN MIXER ADMIXTURE AIR CONTENT HE 16 N/A J(d(d16 LINE u urn ur' LQ'~€%R~~~J~P.~.~~ SPECIAL TEST INSTRUCTION OR REMARKS REQUIRED STRENGTH (f'c) SAMPLES MADE BY 12-14-90 DATE RECEIVED IN LAB LABORATORY DATA FIELD CONTAOL TEST AREA MAX LOAD STRENGTH LAB DATE IDENTITY NUMBER TESTED DIMENSIONS INCHES - SQ INCHES POUNDS COMPRESSIVE 6 X 12 28.27 98,000 3470 LABORATORYDATAREMARKS DlST,RlBUTlON ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH DATE /-/Ye?/ ASTM STANDARD DESIGNATIONS C31-69, C39-80. C78-75. C617-76 No. 042204 WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES 13230 Evening Creek Dr. Sub 218 San Dlego. CA 82128 (61 9) 486-0354 ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ REPORT OF COMPRESSION TESTS ~~ PROJECT " -. . ... .. .. PROJECT ADDRESS 1.812 AS'YON AVENUE, CAHI;SBiD, CALTlWllNNIA CONTRACTOR ARCHITECT/ENGINEER TO BE BILLED BLDG. PERMIT NO. COBRA GOLF PROJECT NO. 90-292 - . . .- ,. . " ." . - MQ CONS'l'KUCl'ION GENE CHW ASSOCIATES ~ 90-0566 PLAN FILE NO. CB90-566 SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF CONCRETE MORTAR GROUT OTHER SUPPLIER MIX DESCRIPTION MIX NUMBER SLUMP TYPE CEMENT UNIT WEIGHT N/A DESIGN STRENGTH _____.. LOCATION OF PLACEMENT ESCONDIDO READY MIX PLACEMENT DATE 12-11-90 6 SACK 5412 4 " I1 .__. TICKET NUMBER TIME IN MIXER . N/A ADMIXTURE AIR CONTENT N/A 1285880 N/A - 3000 FOOTING LINE D @ 6 " " SPECIAL TEST INSTRUCTION OR REMARKS REQUIRED STRENGTH (t'c) SAMPLES MADE BY 3000 PSI AT 28 DAYS DATE RECEIVED IN LAB JOSEPH PELLACK 12-13-90 LABORATORY DATA LAB FIELD CONTHOL DATE DIMENSIONS COMPRESSIVE IDENTITY NUMBER TESTED TEST AREA INCHES sa INCHES MAX LOAD POUNDS STRENGTH PSI 7 'i? " 9fl-L-A 3A 3770. 106,500 91"- " 54 "- 55 " 6 X 12 3660 103,500 28.27 LABORATORYDATAREMARKS DISTRIBUTION __ ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH DATE &@l% ASTM STANDARD DESIGNATIONS C31-69. C39-80, C78-75. C617-76 WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES 13230 Evenlng Creek Dr. Sulle 218 San Dlego, CA 92128 (61 9) 406-0354 REPORT OF COMPRESSION TESTS PROJECT . - -. . .. PROJECT ADDRESS 181.2 ASION AVENUE, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR ARCHITECT/ENGINEER .. . .. TO BE BILLED BLDG. PERMIT NO. COBRA GOLF PROJECT NO. 90-292 MQ CONSTRUCTION GENE CI.lAFQ ASSOCIATES " . .- . 90-0566 PLAN FILE NO. -- CB90-566 SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF H CONC"EE~Cs~q~T~RRl~~~~~XO OTHER - .- - SUPPLIER MIX DESCRIPTION " TICKET NUMBER MIX NUMBER SLUMP ADMIXTURE TYPE CEMENT - _I - > . 5 bAL'L\" PLACEMENT DATE ~- " 3>!dU)o3 Yld MIN HE -16 6 " I1 TIME IN MIXER AIR CONTENT N/A UNIT WEIGHT ___ " . - DESIGN STRENGTH LOCATION OF PLACEMENT _________ ' N/A 3000 PANEL #W-6, MIDDLE ON TOP OF LEDGER SPECIAL TEST INSTRUCTION OR REMARKS REQUIRED STRENGTH (l'c) SAMPLES MADE BY DATE RECEIVED IN LAB 3000 ED HOLLOWAY PSI AT DAYS 12-13-90 LABORATORY DATA LAO FIELD CONTIIOL rmn DIMENSIONS COMPRESSIVE IDENTITY NUMBER TEST AREA TESTED MAX LOAD INCHES STRENGTH SO INCHES POUNUS PSI 6 X 12 28.27 76,000 2690 6 X 12 28.27 116,500 4120 " 1-09-9 6 X 12 28.27 - 121,000 ". 4280 -~ I."" 1 ", I" " -. . . . I I._ - I ~ ~~ ~ ~~~~ ~ LABORATORY DATA REMARKS - DISTRIBUTION n&:- R VIEWED BY: ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH DATE /"9/ ASTM STANDARD DESIGNATIONS C31-69, C39-00, C78-75, C617-76 WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES 13230 Ebenlng hek Dr. San Dlego, CA 92128 Sulte 218 (61 9) 488-0354 REPORT OF COMPRESSION TESTS COBRA GOLF 183.2 ASlYlN AVENUE, CARLSBAD, CALINIRNIA MQ CONSTRUCTION GENE CHAFO ASSOCIATES PROJECT -- PROJECT ADDRESS CONTRACTOR ARCHITECT/ENGINEER TO DE BILLED BLDG. PERMIT NO. PROJECT NO. 90-292 - "- 90-0566 PLAN FILE NO. ci390-566 SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF CONCREJE SUPPLIER MIX DESCRIPTION MIX NUMBER SLUMP TYPE CEMENT - AIR CONTENT UNIT WEIGHT ___ ~ DESIGN STRENGTH LOCATION OF PLACEMENT __ OTHER 3.3 SACK 333 4.-.1/2,, TIME IN MIXER ii~-.'TZ;"' __ I1 ADMIXTURE N/A 3000 PLACEMENT DATE TICKET NUMBER 12-12-90 350850 40 MIN " "" - ". N/A PANEL #S-2, BOTTOM RIGHT CORNER 'A' _ "" SPECIAL TEST INSTRUCTION OR REMARKS REQUIRED STRENGTH (f'c) SAMPLES MADE BY DATE RECEIVED IN LAB 3000 ED HOLLOWAY PSI AT 28 DAYS 12-13-90 - LABORATORY DATA LAD COMPRESSIVE FIELD CONTROL DATE DIMENSIONS MAX LOAD STRENGTH IDENTITY NUMBER TESTED INCHES TEST AREA SQ INCHES POUNDS ~~~~~~~~- E ii 1 1~~:~~~ 1 4170 115,000 4070 1-09-9 6 X 12 2460 PSI I 1'1 I "I I 12" I.._ _" J LABORATORYDATAREMARKS DISTRIBUTION _.______ ___.. REVIEWED BY: 1~- ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH DATE -/-/o-% ASTM STANDARD DESIGNATIONS - c31-69, c39-80, c7a-75. ~617-76 WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES 13230 Evenlng Creek Dr. Sulle 218 San Dlego, CA 92128 (61 9) 486-0354 REPORT OF COMPRESSION TESTS PROJECT PROJECT ADDRESS 3.81.2 ASSN AVENUE, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR ARCHlTECTlENGlNEER GENE TO BE BILLED BLDG. PERMIT NO. COBRA GOLF PROJECT NO. 90-292 MQ CONSTRUCTION 9 0-056 6 PLAN FILE NO. cB90-566 SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF CONCRETE 0 MORTAR 0 GROUT 0 OTHER SUPPLIER MIX DESCRIPTION MIX NUMBER SLUMP ADMIXTURE TYPE CEMENT ESCONDIDO READY MIX PLACEMENT DATE 12-12-90 5.5 SACK 355 TICKET NUMBER N/A 72 MIN HE -16 4 - ip---" TIME IN MIXER - - I1 AIR CONTENT N/A ., ,> "" UNIT WEIGHT LOCATION OF PLACEMENT lY/ fi DESIGN STRENGTH 3www LINTEL-E"2 MIDDLE BOTH WAYS SPECIAL TEST INSTRUCTION OR REMARKS ~ REQUIRED STRENGTH (f'c) " 3000 m HOLLOWAY PSI AT 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY DATE RECEIVED IN LAB 12-13-90 LABORATORY DATA FIELD CONTI-1OL DATE DIMENSIONS TEST AREA MAX LOAD LAB COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH IDENTITY NUMBER TESTED INCHES sa INCHES 5 POUNDS 57 117,500 28.27 6 X 12 1-09-91 59 28 117,000 28.27 6 X 12 1-09-91 58 28 74,500 28.27 6 X 12 "2-17-90 - LABORATORY DATA REMARKS DISTRIBUTION /RE=; ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH DATE /-/o% ASTM STANDARD DESIGNATIONS C31-69. C39-60. C76-75. C617-76 a r ,, ,I . . . WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES 13230 Evenlng Creek Dr. San Dlego, CA 92128 SUlt.9 218 (619) 466-0354 REPORT OF COMPRESSION TESTS PROJECT PROJECT ADDRESS 1.81.2 ASTONAVENUE, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR ~ ARCHlTECTlENGlNEER TO BE BILLED BLDG. PERMIT NO. COBRA GOLF __ PROJECT NO. 90-292 MQ CONSTRUCTION GENE CHAFO ASSOCIATES 90-0566 PLAN FILE NO. __ CB90-566 SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF W CONCRETE 0 MORTAR 0 GROUT 0 OTHER SUPPLIER MIX DESCRIPTION MIX NUMBER SLUMP 4-1/4" ADMIXTURE N/A TYPE CEMENT I1 AIR CONTENT N/A UNIT WEIGHT -!/A_--- DESIGN STRENGTH 3000 LOCATION OF PLACEMENT > ESCONDIDO READY MIX PLACEMENT DATF 12-07-90 5.5 SACK 54-12451 TICKET NUMBER 350773 TIME IN MIXER 30 MIN ." SPECIAL TEST INSTRUCTION OR REMARKS REOUIRED STRENGTH (l'c) 3000 PSI AT 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY JOHN POWELL DATE RECEIVED IN LAB 12-10-90 LABORATORY DATA FIELD LAB CONTROL DATE DIMENSIONS TEST AREA MAX LOAD STRENGTH IDENTITY NUMBER TESTED INCHES SO INCHES POUNDS PSI COMPRESSIVE LABORATORYDATAREMARKS- " - DISTRIBUTION Q-/L. REVIEWED BY: ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH DATE /-8-9/ ASTM STANDARD DESIGNATIONS C31-69. C39-80, C76-75. C617-76 WYMAN TESTING ... .. LABORATORIES 13230 Evenlng Creek Dr. San Dlego. CA 92128 Sulle 21 8 (61 9) 486-0354 13230 Evenlng Creek Dr. San Dlego. CA 92128 Sulle 21 8 (61 9) 486-0354 REPORT OF COMPRESSION TESTS PROJECT PROJECT ADDRESS CONTRACTOR ARCHlTECTlENGlNEER TO BE BILLED BLDG. PERMIT NO. COBRA GOLF 3.81,2 ASTON AVENUE, CARLSDAD, CALIEORJIA MQ CONSTRUCTION GENE CHAPO ASSOCIATES - PROJECT NO. 90-292 - "_ 90-0566 PLAN FILE NO. CB90-566 - SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF CONCRETE 0 MORTAR 0 GROUT 0 OTHER SUPPLIER ESCONDIDO READY MIX PLACEMENT DATE 1.2-07-90 MIX DESCRIPTION 5.5 SACK 355 MIX NUMBER TIME IN MIXER SLUMP 4-3/41' TYPE CEMENT - AIR CONTENT UNIT WEIGHT LOCATION OF PLACEMENT TICKET NUMBER 350764 32 MIN PO22 N/A 3000 I1 N/A ADMIXTURE DESIGN STRENGTH TILT UP PANEL #s5 SPECIALTEST INSTRUCTION OR REMARKS REQUIRED STRENGTH (f'c) 3000 PSI AT DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY JOHN POWELL - DATE RECEIVED IN LAB 12-18-90 LABORATORY DATA " LAB IDENTITY NUMBER TESTED INCHES FIELD CONTHOL DATE DIMENSIONS MAX LOAD STRENGTH TEST AREA COMPRESSIVE sa INCHES POUNDS PSI 7 3820 108,000 28.27 6 X 12 01-04-91 43 28 3890 11.0,000 28.27 6 X 12 a1-04-91 42 2a 2560 72.500 28.27 6 X 12 12-14-90 41 .___ - LABORATORYDATAAEMARKS .~ " " DISTRIBUTION - ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH DATE /-t? ASTM STANDARD DESIGNATIONS C31-89. C39-80, C78-75. C617-76 .. . ., .. WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES *& San Dlego, CA 92128 13230 EVenlng Creek Dr. suile 218 (61 9) 486-0354 REPORT OF COMPRESSION TESTS PHOJECT PROJECT ADDRESS 1.81.2 ASTON AVENUE, CARLSBAD, - CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR ARCHITECT/ENGINEER GmE CHAPO ASSOCIATES TO BE BILLED BLDG. PERMIT NO. COBRA GOLF -. PROJECT NO. 90-292 MQ CONSTRUCTION 90-0566 PLAN FILE NO, CB90-566 SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF H CONCRETE 0 MORTAR 0 GROUT 0 OTHER SUPPLIER ESCONDIDO READY MIX PLACEMENT DATE 12-07-90 MIX DESCRIPTION __ TICKET NUMBER 350748 MIX NUMBER 355 . TIME IN MIXER 36 MIN SLUMP ". ADMIXTURE POZZ TYPE CEMENT UNIT WEIGHT N/A DESIGN STRENGTH 3000 LOCATION OF PLACEMENT up PANEL #N-2 5.5 SACK 4-1/4" I1 AIR CONTENT N/A SPECIAL TEST INSTRUCTION OR REMARKS REQUIRED STRENGTH (I'c) 3000 -PSI AT 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY ____ JOHN POWELL DATE RECEIVED IN LAB 12-10-90 LABORATORY DATA FIELD IDENTITY I CONTFIOL LAB DATE DIMENSIONS MAX LOAD STRENGTH TEST AREA COMPRESSIVE NUMBER TESTED INCHES sa INCHES POUNDS PSI I 1.2 I... I I" I" LABORATORY DATA REMARKS -*".&YXM.SXA&a"o_FLp.i i DISTRIBUTION EVIEWED BY: ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH DATE /-Be/ ASTM STANDARD DESIGNATIONS (31-69, C39-60, C78-75. (2617-76 WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES 13230 EvenlngCreek Dr. Sulte 218 San Dlego. CA 92128 Lb1TU-L (619) 486-0354 REPORT OF COMPRESSION TESTS PROJECT PROJECT ADDRESS CONTRACTOR ARCHITECT/ENGINEER TO BE BILLED BLDG. PERMIT NO. COBRA GOLF 1.83.2 ASlON AVENUE, CARLSBAD, CALI-Wl!HLIA MQ CONSTRUCTION GENE CHAPO ASSOCIATES -. - "" PROJECT NO. 90-292 - 90-0566 PLAN FILE NO, cB90-566 SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF =CONCRETE 0 MORTAR 0 GROUT 0 OTHER SUPPLIER MIX DESCRIPTION MIX NUMBER SLUMP TYPE CEMENT UNIT WEIGHT N/A DESIGN STRENGTH LOCATION OF PLACEMENT ESCONDIDO READY MIX PLACEMENT DATE 12-07-90 5.5 SACK 355 TICKET NUMBER - TIME IN MIXER ADMIXTURE AIR CONTENT N/A 350738 41 MIN POZZ 4-3/41' I1 3000 TILT UP PANEL #Wl SPECIAL TEST INSTRUCTION OR REMARKS ~~~~ ~~ _" REQUIRED STRENGTH (f'c) SAMPLES MADE BY 3000 __- PSI AT 28 DAYS JOHN POWELL "_ ._ DATE RECEIVED IN LAB 12-10-90 ~~ LABORATORY DATA FIELD CONTROL DATE DIMENSIONS TEST AREA MAX LOAD STRENGTH LAB COMPRESSIVE IDENTITY NIJMRER TESTED INCHES sa INCHES POUNDS 7 118,000 28.27 6 X 12 35 2R 1.1.7.000 28.27 6 X 12 " 91 74 3- 79.000 28.21 6 x 17 7? " -- LABORATORYDATAREMARKS DISTRIBUTION . ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM STANDARD DESIGNATIONS C31-69, C39-80. C78-75. 0517-76 WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES (619) 486-0354 REPORT OF COMPRESSION TESTS PROJECT PROJECT ADDRESS 181.2 ASTON AVENUE, CARLsQAD, CALIKXXNTI\ CONTRACTOR ARCHITECT/ENGINEER TO BE BILLED BLDG. PERMIT NO. COBRA GOLF " PROJECT NO. 90-292 .- . " .. " MQ CONSTRUCTION GENE CHAPO ASSOCIATES " "_ 90-0566 - PLAN FILE NO. cB90-566 SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF CONCRETE MORTAR GROUT OTHER SUPPLIER MIX DESCRIPTION MIX NUMBER SLUMP 3-1/2" ADMIXTURE POZZ TYPE CEMENT ESCONDIDO READY MIX PLACEMENT DATE 12-06-90 5.5 SACK 54-12451 TICKET NUMBER TIME IN MIXER 1285284 55 MIN I1 AIR CONTENT WA UNIT WEIGHT N/A DESIGN STRENGTH LOCATION OF PLACEMENT 3000 LINE 1 BETWEEN C & D, ON S-4A SPECIAL TEST INSTRUCTION OR REMARKS ~ ~ ~~~~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ - REQUIRED STRENGTH (f'c) SAMPLES MADE BY 3000 PSI AT 28 DAYS DATE RECEIVED IN LAB JULIE MOEN 12-10-90 LABORATORY DATA FIELD CONTHOL DATE DIMENSIONS MAX LOAD STRENGTH TEST AREA LAB IDENTITY NUMBER TESTED INCHES COMPRESSIVE sa INCHES POUNDS 7 49 " 6 28- 50 6 X 12 28.27 106,500 28 51 01-03-91 6 X 12 28.27 106,500 " LABORATORYDATAREMARKS DISTRIBUTION REV1 WED BY: ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH DATE LdZ" 0~ NO. 042204 ASTM STANDARD DESIGNATIONS C31-69, C39-80, C78-75, C617-76 WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES 13230 Evening Creek Dr. Suile 218 San Diego. CA 92120 (619) 486-0354 ~ ~~~ ~~~ ~ REPORT OF COMPRESSION TESTS PROJECT PROJECT ADDRESS 1812 ASION AVENUE, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR ARCHITECT/ENGINEER GENE CHAPO TO BE BILLED BLDG. PERMIT NO. COBRA Gow "" PROJECT NO. __ 90-292 MQ CONSTRUCTION 90-OS66 PLAN FILE NO. CB90-566 ~ ~~ ~~~~~ SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF H CONCRETE 0 MORTAR 0 GROUT 0 OTHER - SUPPLIER MIX DESCRlPTiON MIX NUMBER . . .. TIME IN MIXER . SLUMP TYPE CEMENT UNIT WEIGHT N/A DESIGN STRENGTH 3000 LOCATION OF PLACEMENT SUPERIOR READY MIX 5.5 SACK 355 4 " I1 PLACEMENT DATE 12-01-90 214127 30 MIN POZZ - TICKET NUMBER __ " ADMIXTURE AIR CONTENT - N/A - BOTTOM RIGHT CORNER OF PANEL S-7 _. .. ." .- "" " SPECIAL TEST INSTRUCTION OR REMARKS - REQUIRED STRENGTH (I'c) SAMPLES MADE BY 3000 PSI AT UAYS DATE RECEIVED IN LAB - JULIE MOEN 12-03-90 LABORATORY DATA LAB FIELD CONTROL DATE DIMENSIONS IDENTITY NUMBER TESTED INCHES TEST AREA MAX LOAD STRENGTH SQ INCHES POUNDS PSI COMPRESSIVE 9 3890 110,000 28.27 6 X 12 32-31-96 27 30.. 3930 111,000 28.27 6 X 12 12-31-9E 26 -3U 2900 02,000 28.27 6 X 12 - -, 25 . .. ." " .. ." .- "" "" ." __ .. .. LABORATORYDATAREMARKS . .~ . "_ -. DISTRIBUTION REV EWED BY: ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH DATF 1-2- 9/ C31-69, C39-80, C78-75. C617-76 P WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES 13230 Evenlng Creek Dr. Sulle 21 8 San Diego, CA 92128 (619) 486-0354 REPORT OF COMPRESSION TESTS PROJECT PROJECT ADDRESS 1.81.2 ASTON AVENUE, CARLSBN), CAL1I"ORNIA CONTRACTOR ARCHITECTENGINEER COBRA GOLF PROJECT NO. 90-292 MQ CONSTRUCTION GENE C€IRpo ASSOCIATES ___ - TO BE BILLED BLDG. PERMIT NO. 90-OS66 PLAN FILE NO. CB90-566 SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF CONCRETE 0 MORTAR 0 GROUT 0 OTHER SUPPLIER SUPERIOR READY MIX PLACEMENT DATE 12-01-90 MIX DESCRIPTION 5.5 SACK TICKET NUM0ER 214134 MIX NUMBER 355 TIME IN MIXER -A SLUMP 5 " ADMIXTURE POZZ TYPE CEMENT I1 AIR CONTENT N/A UNIT WEIGHT LA... .... ... ..... ..~... - DESIGN STRENGTH 300 fl LOCATION OF PLACEMENT .~..B.oTToM...MIDDLE OF PANEL #s-3 SPECIAL TEST INSTRUCTION OR REMARKS REQUIRED STRENGTH (I'c) 300fl PSI AT 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY JULIE MSN DATE RECEIVED IN LA0 12-03-90 LABORATORY DATA LA0 FIELD CONTHOL DATE DIMENSIONS TEST AREA MAX LOAD STRENGTH COMPRESSIVE IDENTITY NUMBER TESTED INCHES 7A.37 DISTRIBUTION REVIEWED 0Y: ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH DATE .L!!- ASTM STANDARD DESIGNATIONS C31-69. C39-80, C78-75. C617-76 WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES 13230'Evenlng Creek Dr. San Dlego, CA 92128 Sulte 218 (61 9) 466-0354 REPORT OF COMPRESSION TESTS PROJECT PROJECT ADDRESS CONTRACTOR ARCHITECT/ENGINEER GENE COBRA GOLF 1.81.2 ASTON AVENUE, CAEUSBN), CALIFORNIA MQ CONSTRUCTION PROJECT NO. 90-292 TO BE BILLED BLDG. PERMIT NO. 90-OS66 PLAN FILE NO. cB90-566 SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF =CONCRETE 0 MORTAR 0 GROUT 0 OTHER SUPPLIER MIX DESCRIPTION MIX NUMBER SLUMP TYPE CEMENT UNIT WEIGHT LOCATION OF PLACEMENT ESCONDIDO READY MIX 7 SACK 67 5 " I1 N/A PLACEMENT DATE 11-28-90 TICKET NUMBER TIME IN MIXER ADMIXTURE AIR CONTENT DESIGN STRENGTH 1284243 80 MIN POZZ N/A 3000 CASSIONS AT LINE 6 @ F, MIDDLE OF FIRST LIFT SPECIAL TEST INSTRUCTION OR REMARKS 3UkJkJ 28 REOUIRED STRENGTH (I'c), PSI AT DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY mTE3KTEN DATE RECEIVED IN LAB 11-29-90 LABORATORY DATA FIELD CONTHOL DATE DIMENSIONS TEST AREA MAX LOAD STRENGTH LAB COMPRESSIVE IDENTITY NUMBER TESTED INCHES "- sa INCHES POUNDS PSI 7 4420 125,000 20.27 G X 12 12-26-90 22 28 2620 74,000- 28.27 6 X 12 12-05-90 21 - 28 23 4240 120,000 28.27 6 X 12 12-26-90 ~___ LABORATORYDATAREMARKS DISTRIBUTION ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM STANDARD DESIGNATIONS C31-69, C39-80, C76-75. C617-76 REVIEWED BY: 1- DATE L"&=?.&.% i WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES 13230 Eienlng Creek Dr. San Dlego, CA 92128 Sulte 218 (619) 486-0354 REPORT OF COMPRESSION TESTS PROJECT PROJECT ADDRESS 1812 ASTON AVENUE, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR ARCHITECT,ENGINEER GENE CHAPO ASSOCIATES COBRA GOLF PROJECT NO. 90-292 MQ CONST'RUCTION TO BE BILLED BLDG. PERMIT NO. 90-0566 PLAN FILE NO, CB90-s66 " SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF CONCRETE o MORTAR GROUT OTHER ~ ~~~~~~ SUPPLIER MIX DESCRIPTION MIX NUMBER SLUMP TYPE CEMENT UNIT WEIGHT LOCATION OF PLACEMENT ESCONDIDO READY MIX 7 SACK 213885 67 60 MIN NA . ADMIXTURE !_ PLACEMENT DATE ~ TICKET NUMBER ~ TIME IN MIXER 11-26-90 4" _____~ I1 N/h AIR CONTENT DESI N STR NGTH N/A"" 3000 CAISSONS /.El?, I.ZF, DE & D5 SPECIAL TEST INSTRUCTION OR REMARKS .5UUW Lt( REQUIRED STRENGTH p1 LAmL SAMPLES MADE BY DATE RECEIVED IN LAB PSI AT __ DAYS 11-27-90 LABORATORY DATA LAB IDENTITY NUMBER TESTED INCHES SO INCHES POUNDS PSI FIELD CONI 11OL I)IMENSIONS TEST AREA MAX LOAD STRENGTH DATE COMPRESSIVE 7 17 10I, 000 3 570 :.2-03-90 145,000 5130 19 28 T.2-24-90 I 8 28 ri.T[:-iri 5060 2-24-90 . ". . -. " - "_ ." " - LABORATORYDATAREMARKS DISTRIBUTION ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM STANDARD DESIGNATIONS C31-69. C39-80. C78-75, C617-76 WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES 13230 Evenlng Creek Dr. Sulle 21 8 San Dlego, CA 92128 (619) 486-0354 REPORT OF COMPRESSION TESTS PROJECT PROJECT ADDRESS 1812 ASTON AVENUE, CARLSBAD, CALIFORJB CONTRACTOR ARCHITECT/ENGINEER GENE CHAPO TO BE BILLED BLDG. PERMIT NO. COBRA GOLF PROJECT NO. 90-292 MQ CONSTRUCTION 90-OS66 PLAN FILE NO. _____ CB90-566 SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF CONCRETE 0 MORTAR 0 GROUT 0 OTHER SUPPLIER ESCONDIDO READY MIX 7 SACK MIX DESCRIPTION TICKET NUMBER MIX NUMBER 67 SLUMP 3-1/2" TYPE CEMENT I1 UNIT WEIGHT LOCATION OF PLACEMENT PLACEMENT DATE 11-20-90 1283492 N/A 13 GALLONS WATER TIME IN MIXER ADMIXTURE AIR CONTENT DESIGN STRENGTH N/A N/A L CAISSO NS ON 8 LINE BETWEEN F & E 3000 SPECIAL TEST INSTRUCTION OR REMARKS Jldldld ztl REQUIRED STRENGTH (I'c)~ SAMPLES MADE BY DATE RECEIVED IN LAB PELLACK PSI AT DAYS LABORATORY DATA FIELD CONTROL DATE DIMENSIONS IDENTITY NUMBER TESTED INCHES TEST AREA MAX LOAD STRENGTH SQ INCHES POUNDS LAB COMPRESSIVE 7 56 dl-27-90 6 X 12 28.27 28 28 58 12-18-90 6 X 12 28.27 73,000 57 12-18-90 6 X 12 28.27 125,000 'DISTRIBUTION REVIEWED BY: ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH DATE (Z-/8-?'a ASTM STANDARD DESIGNATIONS C31-69. C39-80, C78-75. '2617-76 WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES 13230 Evehlng Cre'ek Dr. Sulte 218 San DIRQO, CA 921 213 (619) 466-0354 REPORT OF COMPRESSION TESTS PROJECT PROJECTADDRESS 1812 ASTON AVENOE, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR ARCHITECT/ENGINEER cHm COBRA GOLF PROJECT NO. 90-292 MQ CONSTRUCTION TO BE BILLED BLDG. PERMIT NO. 90-0.566 - PLAN FILE NO. cB90-566 SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF CONCRETE 0 MORTAR 0 GROUT 0 OTHER SUPPLIER ESCONDIDO READY MIX PLACEMENT DATE 11-12-90 MIX DESCRIPTION 6 SACK TICKET NUMBER 1282605 MIX NUMBER SLUMP TYPE CEMENT 16 3 " I1 TIME IN MIXER 60 MIN ADMIXTURE N/A AIR CONTENT N/A UNIT WEIGHT N/A DESIGN STRENGTH 3250 LOCATION OF PLACEMENT CAISSON AT €1-4, SECOND POUR AFTER COLD JOINT SPECIAL TEST INSTRUCTION OR REMARKS ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~ ~ ~~ REQUIRED STRENGTH (f'c) SAMPLES MADE BY DATE RECEIVED IN LAB 3000 JOSEPH PELLACK PSI AT DAYS 11-13-90 LABORATORY DATA FIELD CONTHOL DATE DIMENSIONS TEST AREA MAX LOAD LAB COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH PSI IDENTITY NUMBER TESTED INCHES sa INCHES POUNDS 7 2790 79,000 28.27 6 X 12 :.1-19-90 13 28 3960 112,000 28.27 6 X 12 1.2-10-90 15 28 3960 112,000 20.27 6 X 12 :.2-10-90 14 4 LABORATORY DATA REMARKS 'DISTRIBUTION Q-Ya- REVIEWED BY: ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH DATE /z -/c?-yb ASTM STANDARD DESIGNATIONS C31-69, C39-BO. C76-75, C817-76 WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES 13230 Evenlng Creek Dr. Sulte 218 San Dlego. CA 92128 (61 9) 486-0354 ~~~ ~ ~ ~ REPORT OF COMPRESSION TESTS PROJECT PROJECT ADDRESS 1812 ASTON AVENUE, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR ARCHITECT/ENGINEER GENE cnnm COBRA GOLF ___ PROJECT NO. 90-292 MQ CONSTRUCTION TO BE BILLED BLDG. PERMIT NO. 90-0566 PLAN FILE NO. -- CB90-566 SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF CONCRETE 0 MORTAR 0 GROUT 0 OTHER SUPPLIER MIX DESCRIPTION MIX NUMBER SLUMP TYPE CEMENT AIR CONTENT UNIT WEIQHT LOCATION OF PLACEMENT ESCONDIDO READY MIX PLACEMENT DATE 11-09-90 5.6 SACK 83-146 2 " If N/A 3250 TICKET NUMBER TIME IN MIXER 1282433 60 MIN - ADMIXTURE __ N/A N/A CASSI. 0 N AT H-4 DESIQN STRENGTH - SPECIAL TEST INSTRUCTION OR REMARKS ~~~~~~ ~~___ - LU PULL7 REQUIRED STRENGTH (f'~)~ SAMPLES MADE BY DATE RECEIVED IN LAB PSI AT DAYS 11-13-90 LABORATORY DATA FIELD CONTHOL DATE DIMENSIONS TEST AREA MAX LOAD STRENQTH LAB COMPRESSIVE IDENTITY NUMBER TESTED INCHES rr7-90.-6 X 12 109,000 28.27 6 X 12 2-07-90 72,000 28.27 sa INCHES POUNDS 28 11 2-07-90 111,000 28.27 6 X 12 LABORATORYDATAREMARKS t DISTRIBUTION REVIEWED BY: 1- ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH DATE /z-/o-ro ASTM STANDARD DESIGNATIONS C31-69, C39-80, '278-75, C617-76 WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES 13230 Evenlng Creek Dr. Sub 21 8 San Dlego, CA 921 28 (619) 486-0354 REPORT OF COMPRESSION TESTS ~~~ ~~ ~ ~~ PROJECT PROJECT ADDRESS 1.812 ASTON AVENUE, CARISBAD, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR ARCHITECT/ENGINEER GENE CHm TO BE BILLED BLDG. PERMIT NO. COBRA GOLF PROJECT NO. 90-292 MQ CONSTRUCTION 90-0566 PLAN FILE NO. CB90-566 SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF W CONCRETE 0 MORTAR 0 GROUT 0 OTHER SUPPLIER MIX DESCRIPTION MIX NUMBER SLUMP TYPE CEMENT UNIT WEIGHT LOCATION OF PLACEMENT ESCONDIDO READY MIX PLACEMENT DATE 11-02-90 5.4 SACK 54-12451 4-1/2" I1 N/A TICKET NUMBER TIME IN MIXER ADMIXTURE AIR CONTENT DESIGN S RENGTH 349908 N/A N/A N/A 3000 FOUNDATION GRID LINE 5.6 TI<. 3) SPECIAL TEST INSTRUCTION OR REMARKS 3ldldld 28 REQUIRED STRENGTH (1'~)~ SAMPLES MADE BY DATE RECEIVED IN LAB u LE- PSI AT DAYS 11-06-90 LABORATORY DATA LAB IDENTITY NUMBER TESTED INCHES FIELD CONTt3OL DATE DIMENSIONS COMPRESSIVE TEST AREA MAX LOAD STRENGTH sa INCHES POUNDS PSI LABORATORYDATAREMARKS 'DISTRIBUTION ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM STANDARD DESIGNATIONS C31-69. '239-80. C78-75, C617-76 13230 Evening Creek Dr. Sulte 21 0 San Diego. CA 92120 (619) 406-0354 .. REPORT OF COMPRESSION TESTS PROJECT PROJECTADDRESS 1.81.2 ASTON AVENUE, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR ARCHlTECTlENGlNEER GENE COBRA GOLF PROJECT NO. 90-292 MQ CONSTRUCTION TO BE BILLED BLDG. PERMIT NO. 90-OS66 PLAN FILE NO. c89°-566 SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF CONCRETE 0 MORTAR 0 GROUT 0 OTHER SUPPLIER 10-31-90 MIX DESCRIPTION 213139 MIX NUMBER - TIME IN MIXER -_.____ 70 MIN SLUMP POZZ TYPE CEMENT UNIT WEIGHT LOCATION OF PLACEMENT ESCONDIDO READY MIX 5.4 SACK 54-12451 3-1/4" I1 PLACEMENT DATE TICKET NUMBER ADMIXTURE AIR CONTENT DESIGN STRENGTH - N/A N/A 3000 D LINE COLUMN FOOTINGS (INTERIOR) SPECIAL TEST INSTRUCTION OR REMARKS - REQUIRED STRENGTH (f'c) SAMPLES MADE BY 3000 28 GREG WOLFMAN PSI AT ___ DAYS DATE RECEIVED IN LAB 11-06-90 - LABORATORY DATA LAB IDENTITY NUMBER TESTED INCHES FIELD CONTROL DATE DIMENSIONS TEST AREA MAX LOAD COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH sa INCHES POUNDS 1-28-90 6 X 12 28.27 120,000 "_ - " I AR IDENTITY NUMBER TESTED INCHES sa INCHES POUNDS 1-07-916 6 X 12 28.27 72,000 1 2550 1-28-90 6 X 12 28.27 1-28-90 6 X 12 28.27 FIELC "_ - " LABORATORY DATA REMARKS - - ". . -. DISTRIBUTION REVIEWED BY: ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITIi DATE //-z8-9_0 ASTM STANDARD DESIGNATIONS C31-69. C39-80. C78-75. C617-76 5751 Palmer Way, Suite D, Carlsbad, California 92008 The undersigned has observed the -caisson excavations listed above on the referenced property and same were excavated in accordance with our recommendations in the preliminary foundation report and the Building Code of the '<& Q I I I I I I I I GeoSofls, Inc. By : &.C=J" / /a Page of FIELD TESTING REPORT SUPT. Tbnr CONTRACTOR fmd q' &f?/dG GeoSoils. Inc. > ~. . . .. . .. . 5751 Palmer Way, Suite D - Carlsbad, California 92008 1619) 438-3155 FAX (8191 931-0915 EQUIPMENT 5751 Palmer Way, Suite 0, Carlsbad, California 92008 The undersigned has observed the -+ed,&ar- excavations listed above on the referenced property and same were excavated with our ,recommendations in the Building Code of the ci I! -6 5751 Palmer Way, Suite 0, Carlsbad, California 92008 JOB: SCST NO. SI. MTE I Cobra Golf 9012029 I 3 11-05-90 1812 Aston Am., Carlsbad 90292 900566 AOORESS: ELOG. PERMIT NO. PLAN FIL CB90-868fl Afi. ,TECT: TYPE INSPECTION: Gene chap0 Assoc. Arch AIA Reinforced concrete EN<. ::R: MATERIAL INSPECTEO: Reinforcing steel mix 5412451, 5.4 s 10-31-90 Greg wolfram 259 ASIM A615 Gd 40 & 60 concrete 3000 psi from Esc. Readymix Time Arrived: 1000 Time Departed: 1630 Inspectea reinforcm steel fur all interim column footimp fm 2 line to 6 line, stair footing at 6 to 6.5 and E to F, and exterior footing on B line from 1.1 to awtely 4.7 line. pravided continuous inspection during placement of 83.5 cubic yards of corcrete mix P5412451 from Esc. Readymur concrete was placed by tailgate and consolidated by the use of a . into inspectea foot^. tamper. One set of four concrete test cylinders was made from concrete placed in D line column footings with a slunp 3 1/2. mess otherwise noted, reinfoxing steel and amCrete placement appeared acceptable per approved plans and the U.B.C. City of Carlsbad job. inspector approved footings for comete placement while I was on the OlSTRl9UTlON: (1) wymn hterprises, Inc. WUTHIERN CALIFORNIA SOIL AND TIIIBTINQ, INC.. GROUND FAULT XNTERRUPTER CERTXFXCATXON TEST EST PERFORFED AT: f I ff6. : .. i CALIF. LIC. 0 E3791 (619) 798-9661 c -. Bergelectric Corp. TO : City of Carlsbad SUBJECT: Certificate of Compliance for Switchgear Torquing Requirements JOB 2 Cobra Golf Carlsbad, California 18120 Aston Avenue This letter is to certify that all the "Siemens ITE" torquing requirements met by our field personnel. on all switchboards and panels for the above mentioned project have been RA: tmg 650OpperStreet,Escondido,CA92029Tel(619)746-1003 Fax(619)741-0918 #C10-#85046 SUSJECT: TESTING ELECTRICAL M€lER ON PERMANENT BASIS Clearance of the meter located at /812 As%d is for testing purposes only. It expires in 30 days, Issuance of this permit does not imply that the project is finalized or that a Certificate of Occupancy has been issued. The building will not be approved for occupancy until all applicable City departments have approved the project. Please return this statement with your signature. The meter will be cleared through the San Diego Gas and Electric Company by the Building Inspector of record. Thank you for your cooperation. TONY MATA Principal Building Inspector Applicant.\ / Date: 5-29- Q/ cc: Fire Marshall 2075 Las Palmas Drive - Carlsbad. California 92009 - (619) 438-1 161 \~ , ESGIL CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO. CA 92123 (619) 5601468 DATE : (FSpr- (1 -4\ JURISDICTION: cxn\ , &v\sbd v PLAN CHECK NO: 010 G/&. @ e/ 3 ET: Z CUPS PROJECT ADDRESS: I$? la c_ YjDESIGNER aslo- PROJECT NAME: c Dbrk ( ~ /L\A c \“bum\. A~L,(- J W The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction’s building codes when minor deficien- 0 necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction‘s cies identified MBLd checked by building department staff. are resolved and 0 identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant’s copy of the check list is enclosed for the E The plans are being held at Esgil Corp. until corrected Ti jurisdiction to return to the applicant contact person. c] The applicant’s copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil staff did not advise the applicant contact person that plan check has been completed. been completed. Person contacted: Esgil staff - did advise applicant that the plan check has Date contacted: Telephone # REMARKS : By : -%(a- Enclosures: &,,c ‘ ESGIL CORPORATION q I3 OGA OAA URN ODM ESGIL CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO. CA 92123 (619) 560-1468 0 necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply 0 with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficien- cies identified checked by building department staff. are resolved and 0 identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corp. until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the 'h 0 jurisdiction to return to the applicant contact person. e The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: fCICdP 'Chap'\ 6-3-i - e hs. Nu14ha- \6l 5 a\ank .. "ach 0 rA, CIaa75 .. e Esgil staff did not advise the applicant contact person that plan check has been completed. .. 0 Esgil staff - did advise applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: By : 5dI.4 Enclosures: hlfin, ESGIL CORPORATION 3s I " I .. I I I I Air Conditionine I I Commercial . . I 'a .I I IC I Residential I@ I Res. or Corn. Fire Snrinklers I @' OuildInj Pcrnit fee S-- - "" Plan Check Fee $ ESGIL CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) 560-1468 DATE : Sept - la-60 JURISDICTION: e,% o\ c ~Gv \5% C x. UFILE COPY LDESIGNER PLAN CHECK NO: a - ci 0 -6Lp/o SET: f-~ UUPS PROJECT ADDRESS : \% \ a Gs\,, a#& The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply 0 with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficien- . ties identified checked by building department staff. are resolved and 0 identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corp. until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the 0 jurisdiction to return to the applicant contact person. 0 The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil staff did not advise the applicant contact person that plan check has been completed. 0 Esgil staff - did advise applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted,: Telephone C 0 REMARKS: By : 5L Enclosures: ICOQC. ESGIL CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR.. SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO. CA 92 123 (619) 5601468 0 necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected. where building codes. 0 with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficien- The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply cies identified are resolved and checked by building department staff. 0 identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. plans are submitted for recheck. %heto.3 The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the 8 The plans are being held at Esgil Corp. until corrected 0 jurisdiction to return to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: qerre C go 535 - a A!. N WY 101 .5L8, CAS Esgil staff did not advise the applicant contact person that plan check has been completed. 0 Esgil staff plicant that the plan check has been completed Date contacted: Telephone # m REMARKS: us - 38 arm 4or'i~c'~ OA " -,,re~G.q - XK U By : 5&j re Enclosures: .dome ESGIL CORPORATION - t' . ESGIL CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR.. SUITE 208 S.4S DIEGO, Cil 92123 (61 9) 560- 1468 . f’ . i . I I 'I . I I1 I ESGIL CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR.. SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO, CA 92 I23 (619) 560.1468 PROJECT ADDRESS: 1612 ibT?JN AVE PROJECT NAME: OFFICrC / l,/ouji- 0 necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's The plans transmitted herewith ha17e been corrected where building codes. 0 with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficien- The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply cies identified are resolved and checked by building department staff. 0 identified on the enclosed check list and should be correctee The plans transmitted herewith have siqnificant deficiencies and resubmitted for a complete recheck. . The check list transmitted herewith is for yo'ur information. @ The plans are being held at Esgil Corp. until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. jurisdiction to return to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: . Esgil staff did not advise the applicant contact person that @ plan check has been completed. 0 Esgil staff did advise applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted: Telephone C 0 REMARKS: By : P f=<ILM.< ESGIL COePORATION 6h Enclosures: @GA OAA Ovw @DM JURISDICTION: CrteLLPM Date plans received by plan checker: 'A8h4 PLAN CHECK NO.: 90- 56L Date plan recheck completed: 7/L By: ? ff2C KI< PROJECT ADDRESS: /LIZ ASEN 6Vb TO : LENF < u.4 PO RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION SHEET FOREWORD: PLEASE RWD Plan check is limited to technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. The plan check is based on regulations enforced by the Building Inspection Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The items shown below need clarification, modification or change. All items have to be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 303(c), of the Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, countv or citv law. A. PLANS Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints, and any original plan sets that may have been returned to you by the jurisdiction, to: The following items have not been resolved from previous plan reviews. The original correction number has been given for your reference. In case you did not keep a copy of the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the still outstanding corrections. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items. been made to the plans that are not a result Please indicate here if any changes have To facilitate rechecking, please identify, of corrections from this list. If there are next to each item, the sheet of the plans other changes, please briefly describe them upon which each correction on this sheet has and where they are located on the plans. been made and return this check sheet with the revised plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please check. Yes No _Shk AFACh!O S*fZ P-e Cfir/C,&rn6 ~lRcLh0 C r>Kc Ir 3 ah, . .... ... .... Provide a note with the building data legend statim that vards used for area increases please de all corrections on the original traclngs and submit two new sets of prints, and / ~ ~~ ~~~ shall be pekently maintained. D~ ~ any original plan sets that may have been returned to you by the jurisdiction, to: . Indicate on the Title Sheet whether or not a / grading permit is required for this project. Esgil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123, (619) 560-1468. /. Please de all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints, and any original plan sets that may have been returned to you by the jurisdiction, to: The jurisdiction's building department. P B. Provide the site address and a vicinity sketch on the Title Sheet. J numbers of the owner and the responsible design Provide the names, addresses and telephone professionals on the Title Sheet. @ All sheets of the plans and the first sheet of the calculations are required to be signed by the California licensed architect or engineer responsible for the plan preparation. Please include the California license number, seal, date of license expiration and the date the plans are signed. Business and Professions Code. Show on the Title Sheet all buildings, structures, walls, etc. included under this application. Any portion of the project shown on the site plan that is not included with the building permit application filed should be clearly identified as "not included" on the site plan or Title Sheet. a Provide a Building Code Data Legend on the Title Sheet. Include the following code information for each building proposed: plans that this project shall comply with Provide a statement on the Title Sheet of the Title 24 and 1988 UBC, UMC and LPC and 1987 NEC . exrred"--+ke ,X!. Specify the uses of all rooms or areas. c. smm . Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show north arrow, property lines, buildinw and structures. easements, streets, existing and proposed - Provide a statement on the site plan stating: "All property lines, easements and buildings, both existing and proposed, are shown on this site plan". Clearly designate on the site plan existing buildings to remain, existing buildings to be demolished, buildings to be constructed under this permit and any proposed future buildings. Clearly designate any side yards used to justify increases in allowable area based on Section 506. , r: . Show on the site plan all proposed walls, heights on the plans. Provide construction retaining walls and fences. Specify their details if a part of this pennit. property lines, street centerlines, and from Clearly dimension building setbacks from all adjacent buildings and structures on the site plan. to exceed allowable area in Table 7 e 2sbop nz ~u~cmm if applicable) 96@, row. . ?e Sa>(-). ALSO tv:lw& r .. ., Rooflceiling and floorlceiling assemblies must be of one-hour construction. Detail fire assemblies on plans along with their ICBO number or other I.D. number from the Fire- Resistive Design Manual published by the Gypsum Assoc. or U.L. number or item number from Table 43-C. Lmc. Detail water heater vents located inside fire- resistive wall construction or within fire- resistive shafts. Section 1706 (a). ;f" Clearly identify location and hourly fire- plans. Provide construction details showing resistive rating of vertical shafts on the resistivity will be maintained.. at floors and location of fire dampers and. how fire roofs. Section 1706. A. Detail column fire protection per Table 43-A in the LJBC and specify colunm impact protection in garage areas per Section 4303 (b) 5. As a minimum, show a 22 ga. steel jacket around each column to a height of 3 feet above the ground for impact protection. Structural members such as beams supporting #' more than one floor or roof must be individually fire protected. (Section 4303 (b) 6.) Detail required protection. Clearly specify minimum thickness of walls and slabs to provide rating per Table 43-B and C. Clearly specify -hour fire-resistive minimum cover for bonded reinforcing at - fire-rated floors, fire rated columns, specify minimum cover for prestressed concrete fire rated beams. Clearly tendons per Section 4303 (c) 3. ;B'. Detail all plumbing and electrical penetrations at occupancy, area, corridor or other fire separation walls as specified in Section 4304 (e). Detail all furred ceilings as required in Section 11203. Show fire-rewdant treated wood where necessary.. . . #. Clearly label; and identify on the plans the walls, shafts, occupancy separation walls and fire-resistive corridors, sea separation floors, exit courts less than 10 feet wide and exit enclosureS, along with their hourly ratings. Section 302 (a). . .. Foam plastics shall not be used as interior finish except as provided in Section 1712. When walls and ceiling are required to be material shall be applied directly against fire-resistive or noncombustible, the finish such fire-resistive or noncombustible construction or to furring strips not exceeding 1-314 inches. The furred space shall be filled with inorganic or Class I material or fire stopped not to exceed 8 feet in any direction. Section 4203, 1. When finish materials are set out or dropped more than 1-314 inches from fire-rated walls or ceilings the finish material shall be Class I or SDrinklered on both sides or attached to noncombkible backing or furring strips. Section 4203, 2. / 84. +gers and assembly members of dropped ceilzngs below a one-hour ceiling assembly Types 111 and V construction, where fire- shall be noncombustible materials except in retardant treated wood may be used. Section 4203, 2. All interior wall or ceiling finishes less than 114 inch thick shall be applied directly against a noncombustible backing unless it is assembly. Section 4203, 4. in accordance with an approved tested Provide a note on the plans or on the finish schedule, 'Wall and ceiling materials shall not exceed the flame spread classifications in 8( C Table 42-B." J. OcamANCYSEpARATION 3,' >A?&& AT, i'>ZC G.$C &die07 cn<S A -hour occupancy separation is required between &occupancy and the Tables L3-A, B, C and Chapter 43. (See ItL occupancy. Table 5-B, Section 503 (a), exceptions in Section 503) - and clerical offices and smilar rooms need not be separated from other nercent of the floor area of the maior use and occupancies provided they are less than 25 <~- ~ ~ ~ not related to^ an _H-2 or €I-3 -occupancy. Section 503 (a). "c Provide __ assemblies in the - -hour fire-resistive door separation. Section 503 (c). -hour occupancy .. . .. A B-1 occupancy in the basement or first story of a building housing a group B, Division 2 building. The building above may also be occupancy may be classed as a separate considered a separate and distinct building for the purpose of area limitation, limitation of number of stories and type of construction ONLY if the conditions of Section 102 are met: a. B-1 is Type I construction. b. B-11B-2 is separated by a three-hour occupancy separation. C. B-1 is restricted to passenger vehicle mechanical equipment -.rooms- :(no storage, storage, entry lobbies, laundry rooms and recreation room, etc.). d. Ihe maximum building height does not exceed the limits in Table 5-D for the A one-hour fire-resistive separation shall be not less than one-hour fire-resistive construction. Openings shall be protected by a one-hour assembly. Section 503 (c). @ Occupancy separation wall penetrations must be either ferrous or copper and fire-stopped. Steel electrical outlet boxes shall not exceed sixteen square inches and further, shall not . exceed one hundred square inches per one hundred square feet of wall, may be installed distance of twenty-four inches when on and shall be separated by a horizontal opposite sides of a wall. Section 4304 (e). @ Clarify that wiring within concealed spaces complles wlth the Mechanical Code and UBC Section 4305 (e). Ducts penetrating one or two-hour occupancy seuaration walls must have fire dmers. A least tpe of construction. fike door is required for three-hour ~~~~ ~~ I-"~ -- Ihe Type I construction is required to have separations. Section 4306 (j). protected openings when located within 20 feet from a property line or canterline of a public Usable space under the first story shall be enclosed and shall be separated from the non- .. way. Section 1803 (b). usable space as required for one-hour fire- resistive construction and the door to the . In Type I construction, no openings are permitted in exterior walls less than 5 feet usable space shall be self-closing, of noncombustible construction or solid wood from a property line. Section 1803 (b). core. not less than 1-314 inches in thickness. ~~ .. Section 1703. ~~ All openings in floors forming a three-hour separation shall be protected by vertical enclosures above and below the opening. The 0 103 Show the basis for the rating of the occupancy walls of such enclosures shall be not less than separation you propose, i.e., Item number in two-hour fire-resistive construction, and Table 43-A, B, C; Gypsum Fire-Resistive Design openines therein shall be orotected bv a one / Manual; U.L., etc. &d one-half-hour assembly.' Section 50; (c) 2. Tables 43-A, B, C and Chapter 43. . Unless the entire building is sprinklered, storage areas in excess of 1000 sq. ft. (3000 sq. ft. if storage area is sprinklered and not 94 Structural members supporting an occupancy otherwise required to be) in connection with / separation mst have the same fire-resistive rating as the separation. Section 503 (b). uublic areas bv a one-hour fire-resistive Sales occupincies shall. be separated from - .. No openings are allowed in a four-hour fire- resistive occupancy separation wall. Section 503 (c). ~~ ~~ ~~~. .""" - occupancy separation. Section 702 (b). K- Ezs , pd openings in a three-hour fire-resistive separation shall be protected by a three-hour not less than two exits. Section 3303 (a). assembly, and openings may not exceed 25 percent of the length of wall in the story and no single opening-shall exceed 120 sq. ft. Section 503 (c). A two-hour fire-resistive separation shall be : . Rooms with more than 10 occupants may have not less than two-hour fire-resistive exit through adjoining room. Revise exits construction. openings shall be protected by a to comply. Section 3303(e). one ad one-half-hour assembly. Section 503 (c). Exits should have a minigum separation of one- half the maximuin overall diagonal dimension of the building or area served. Section 3303 (c). In all occupancies, floors above the first In areas where the occupant load exceeds -, two exits are required. See . Table 33-A. SLL 5LlLu ZEk 4.k1cu - me maximum number of required exits and their required separation must be maintained until egress is provided from the structure. Section 3303 (a). Where a required exit enters a yard or court the minimum width of the yard or court shall be 44" and the yard must be unobstructed and lead to a public way. Section 3311 (b), Section 3301 (b). Where required exits enter an exit court (see definition, Section 404 and 3301), the exit court must discharge into a public way or exit passageway. The exits from the exit court shall Comply with Section 3311 (d) requirements for width, number, and urotection of walls and openings when the~occufant load exceeds 9. 2. Change in width in a exit court shall be effected gradually by a guardrail at least 36 inches hi& and makine an anele of not more than 30 digrees b?ith &e axis gf the court, Section 3311 (a). ~ ~~ Walls of exit passageways shall be without openings except exits and shall have walls, floors and ceilings of the same fire- resistance required for the building, with a minimum one-hour fire-resistive construction. Exit openings in the walls shall be protected by a three-fourths-hour assembly. Section 3312 (a). Basements require two exits. Section 3303 (a). Total width of exits in feet shall be not less than total occupant load served divided by 50. Tributary occupant load from bzsements and stories above shall be per Section 3303 (b) and the maximum width required for any story shall be maintained. No point in the building shall be more than 150 feet (200 if sprinklered) from an exterior exit, horizontal exit, enclosed staiway or exit passageway, measured along the path of travel. This may be increased 100 feet if last 150 feet is in a corridor. Section 3303 (d) (See exceptions). 9 Exit doors should be openable from the inside without the use of a key, s ecial knowledge, or effort. Section 3304(cp [Note that exit doors serving 10 or less occupants may have a night latch, dead bolt, or security chain per Title 24, 2-3304 (c).] from assembly rooms with 50 or more occupants shall not be provided with a latch or lock unless it is panic hardware. Section CCNCH eoor and gates, within the exit path from an assembly room to a public way, shall not be provided with latches or locks unless they are equipped with panic hardware. Section 3318. purposes, they shall conform to the width, When additional doors are provided for egress swing and hardware provisions in Chapter 33. Section 3304(1). Exit doors should be a minimum size of 3 feet by 6 feet 8 inches with a minimum door swine o? 90 degrees. Mimum leaf width is 4 feet: Section 3304 (f) and (g). .'me net dimension (clear width) at doorways should be used in determining exit widths required by Section 3303 (b). Section 3304 panic hardware, door swing, etc., the required (f). In consideration of door thicknesses, exit widths have not been furnished. See door P Y 1 . Regardless of occupant load, a floor or landing not more than 1 inch (112-inch if disabled access is required) below the threshold is required on each side of an exit door. Section 3304 (i). When a door landing serves an occupant load of 50 or more, doors in any position shall not reduce the landing dimension to less than one half its required width. Section 3304 (j). Door landings shall have a length measured in the direction of travel of not less than WI inches. Section 3304 (j). Double acting doors are '. not allowed when serving a tributary occupant load of more than 100, or when part-of a fire assembly, or part of smoke and draft control assemblies or when equipped with panic hardware. Section 3304 (b). Doors should not project more than 7 inches into the required corridor width when fully opened, nor more than one-half of the required corridor width when in any position. Section 3305 (d). 0 118 Exit doors should swing in the direction of " J 9. Revolving, sliding and overhead doors are not permitted as exit doors if the occupant load exceeds 9 or the exit door serves a hazardous area. Section 3304 (h). egrees when serving an occupant load of 50 or more or when serving any hazardous area. Section 3304 (b). - 2/14/90 8 .. 'f t.i. ;41 1. Rams reauired bv Table 33-A shall not exceed ld Stairways should be enclosed as specified in Section 3309: 1:1i; ottier exit ;amps 1:~. amps steeper than / 1:15 shall have handrails as required for stairways. Minimum size landings and landing clearances mst be provided. Section 3307. Stairway width mst be at least 44 inches when serving 50 or more occupants; 36 inches when less than 50, Section 3306 (b). Eighty inch minimum headroom clearance for stairways should be indicated on the plans. Section 3306 (p). Note that this is from a plane tangent to the stairway tread nosing. Staiway handrails should not project mor& than 3-112 inches into the reauired width. Trim and ~~~~ ~~~~ stringers may not project more than 1-112 inches. Section 3306 (b). mclosed usable space under interior or exterior stairdays should be protected on the enclosed side as required for one-hour fire- resistive construction. Show 2 x @ 16" O.C. Section 3306 (m) (n). SWJ~ Ch i-rr~ X AT Landines should not be reduced in width more / than 7 inches by a door when fully open. Section 330b (j). Stairways from upper levels which extend below the level from which egress from the building is provided, shall have an approved barrier to preclude exiting into such lower levels. Section 3306 (h) & 3309 (e). Vertacal distances between stairway landings tbf are kited to 12 feet. Section 3306 (i). All interior stairways and ramps shall be enclosed. In other than H and I occupancies, an enclosure is not required if serving only one adjacent floor and not connected to stairs or corridors serving other floors. Section 3309 (a). ~. inches max b . . -' . - SF Section 3306 (c). -: spvy 0- - Winding and spiral stairways are permitted only in residential occupancies.. Section 3306 (d). a. b. C. d. e. f. Two-hour fire-resistive walls are required construction, and in all buildings over in buildings of Type I and 11-F.R. four stories, and one-hour elsewhere. Only exit doors are allowed to open into exit enclosures. Doors should be labeled one and one-half hours or one-hour fire assemblies, and noted that the maximum transmitted temperature end point shall not exceed 450 degrees (F) above ambient at the and of.30 minutes of the fire exposure specified in UBC Standard 43-2. Exit enclosures should include a corridor on the ground floor extending to the exterior (see exception). Fire-resistive construction should be as required for the exit enclosure, including protected openings. Only exit doors are permitted to open into the corridor. An approved tarrier is required at the ground floor to prevent people from accidentally continuing to the lower level. Usable space is not allowed under the stairs. Occupied floors more than 75 feet above the highest grade should have all exits from the building in smoke-proof enclosures. Section 3310 (b). In buildings four or more stories, one stairway mst extend to the roof. Section 3306 (0). It mst be in a smoke-nroof enclosuri in buildings over 75 feet in height. A first story as allowed by Section 702 shall be included in determining the number of stories when determining if-a staiway to the roof is required. Section 3306 (0). (VJ ~~ 2/14/90 9 0r-l ' yp Handrails are required on each side of stairways. Stairways less than 44" wide or stairways serving one dwelling unit may have one handrail (if not open on both sides). Private stairways (1 tenant) need only have a handrail on one side if 30" or less in height. Handrails shall be 34" above nosing of treads (to be consistent with Title 24 and the UBC) and be continuous. Except for privath-stairnays, at least one rail shall extend 6" beyond top and bottom risers. All stairs shall have handrails terminating in a newel or safety post. Section 3306( j) . Note: Where access for the disabled is necessary, Title 14 requires handrails on both and 12 inches plus the tread width beyond the sides to extend 12 inches beyond the top nosing bottom nosing. The handgrip portion of all handrails shall be not less than 1-112 inches nor more than 2 projecting from walls shall have at least 1-112 inches in cross-sectional dimension. Handrails inches between the wall and the handrail. Section 3306 (j). Openings in the exterior wall below or within 10 feet horizontally of an exterior exit protected by a self-closing assembly having a stairday in buildings over two stories shall be three-fourths-hour rating, unless two separate exterior stairnays serve an exterior exit balcony. Section 3306 (1). #. Openings in exterior walls below or within 10 feet, measured. horizontally, of an exterior stair shall be protected by self-closing fire protection rating when the sfair serves a floor assemblies having a three-fourths-hour fire below it. See exception above. Section 3306 level having openings in two or more floors (1). P . Buildings four or more -stories in height shall have a stairway numbering system complying'with Section 3306 (9). .- n. ~RIDORS Corridors and exterior exit balconies serving 10 or more occupants must be a minimum 44 projection. Section 3305 (a). inches wide and 7 feet high to the lowest When a corridor or exterior exit balcony is accessible to the handicapped, changes in elevation shall be made by means of a ramp. Section 3305 (f). . Corridors serving 30 or more occupants shall have walls and ceilings of one-hour construction except: a. Corridors ereater than 30 feet wide when the occupkts have an exit independent from the corridor. ~~~~ ~~~ ~~~~. b. Exterior sides of exterior exit balconies. c. Corridor walls and ceilings need not be of fire-resistive construction within office spaces having an occupant load of 100 or space is located is equipped with an less when the entire story in which the automatic sprinkler system throughout and smoke detectors are installed within the corridor in accordance with their listing. Section 3305 (g). Exit corridors shall not be interrupted by intervening rooms. Foyers, lobbies or reception rooms constructed as for corridors. shall not be construed as intervening rooms. Section 3305(a). One-hour fire-rated corridors shall have door openlngs protected by tight-fitting smoke and draft control assemblies rated 20 minutes, except openings in interior walls of exterior exit balconies. Doors shall be maintained self-closing or be automatic-closing by action of a smoke detector per Section 4306 (b). Doors shall be gzsketed to provide a smoke and draft seal where the door meets the stop on sides and top. Section 3305 (h). F' Total area of all openings, except doors, in any portion of an interior corridor. shall not exceed 25 percent of the area of &e corridor wall ot me room which it is separating from the corridor. protected by fixed, approved 114 inch thick Such openings shall be wired glass installed in steel frames. Section 3305 (h). Elevators serving more than two stories shall not open into required one-hour exit corridors unless protected by an approved smokeldraft control door system. In high rise buildings refer to Section 1807 (h). Section 3305. penetrations of fire-rated corridor walls and ceilings shall have fire dampers per Section 4306 (j). " 1_. "," L-" ~~ 2/14/90 10 One-hour corridors shall not be used as an integral part of a duct system. This includes the space above a dropped ceiling within the one-hour corridor. UMC Section 706 (b). Provide a complete architectural section of the corridor, and exterior exit balcony, showing all fire-resistive materials and details of construction for all floor, walls, roof and all penetrations. Section 3305 (g). Ceilings of combustible materials cannot be suspended below the one-hour corridor ceiling. In types I11 or V construction fire retardant treated wood may be used. Section 3305 (g). Corridor walls may terminate at the ceiling hour fire-resistive floor or roof system. only if the ceiling is ah element of a one- Section 3305 (g). ;5d .;y' ;"d 0 161. When two exits are required, dead end corridors and exit balconies are limited to 20 feet. Section 3305 (e). ("d.L*Gba 13s If a room with an exhaust fan has a door opening into a rated corridor, show how &e- up air will be provided to the room. The door cannot be undercut, nor can a louver in the door be provided. Section 3305(h)1. it signs are required since the occupant load ceeds fifty. Show all required exit sign ocations. Section 3314 (a). Show two sources of power for the lamps at exit signs. Section 3314(d). Show that exits are lighted with at least a one foot candle at floor level. ection 3313 (a). Show separate sources of power for exit illumination. (Occupant load exceeds 100) ection 3313 (b). e exit, sign locations as shorn are not evators shall be enclosed in a one-hour shaft cent in he I and he I1 F.R. construction wheri the ;levator s%ll . be in a two hour shaft. Section 1706. . Every opening into an elevator shaft enclosure shall be protected by a self-closing fire assembly having a one-hour fire rating in one- hour shafts and one and one-half hours in two hour shafts. Section 1706. .. / two floor levels shall be vented to the 0. Elevator shafts extending through more than outside. The area of vent shall be not less than 3 1125 of the shaft area and a minimum of 3 square feet per elevator. Section 5104. . Elevators in high rise buildings shall comply &Even elevator lobbv or entrance area shall be with Section 1807(b). w provided with an approved smoke detector as required by Section 5103(b). Revise the number of elevator cars per hoistway enclosure to comply with Section 5103(a). Provide clear inside elevator car dimensions as required by U.B.C. Section 5103(d) 6 and Title 24 2-5103(d.l). a. At least one elevator in buildings 4 or more stories in height: 80" by 54", with a 42-inch side slide door. Applies only occupancies, State-ohned buildings, apartments and condominiums. residential care homes, hotels, motels, to: high-rise buildings, AIEII b. Elevator in buildings more than two stories or buildings where disabled access is required to upper level(s): 68" by 54", with a minimum clear door width of 36". c. Elevators other than in (b) above serving less thcn 50 occupants shall have a minimum inside platform of 4 feet 6 inches by 4 feet 6 inches and a minimum clear door width of 36 inches. Provide notes, details or specifications to show the elevator will comply with UBC through 2-5105. Sections 5102-5106 and Title 24 Section 2-5102 @ elevator car door are prohibited at the point Doors other than the hoistway door and the of access to elevator car, except doors readily operable from the car side. Section 5106. P. GL4ssAND(;IAzIR: . Specify on the window schedule the glass type and thickness to show compliance with Table 0 54-A and B. 178. Glazing, in the same wall plane as a door, must be safety glazing if within 12" of the door and less than 60" above the walking surface, unless the g3azin is leaded or faceted glass. Section 5406 fd) 6. '0 179 Glass in excess of 9 sq. ft. with the lowest edge less the 18 inches above a walking surface horizontal member not less than 1-1/2 inches in shall be safety glazing or shall have a width and located between 24 and 36 inches above the walking surface. Section 5406 (d) 7. 9- Roop y - roof covering is required. Table pd Specify roof pitch. . Roof pitch is not adequate for roof covering specified. Specify minimum pitch of 32. Specify roof material and application. Chapter Provide a minimum 22" x 30" attic access opening (or 30" x 30" if equipment is in attic). Section 3205 (c). R. PIREEClXRlIsBMG Fire sprinklers axe required for any story or basement when the floor area exceeds 1,500 sq. ft. and there is not provided at least 20 sq. . ft. of opening entirely above the adjoining ground in each 50 lineal feet or fraction thereof of exterior wall on at least one side, or when openings are provided on only one side and the opposite side is more than 75 feet away. Section 3802 (b). . Fire sprinklers are required in a basement if any portion of a basement is more than 75 feet from openings in an exterior wall. Section 3802 (b). Specify ICBO, UL or other recognized listing approval number for roof materials not covered 14. Fire sprinklers are required at the top of in LIBC, p. /,wo,c&~ u L /~/~,,,~~~~roorns. Chutes extending through three or more rubbish and linen chutes and in their terminal floor shall have additional surinkler heads for drainage or design to support accumulated Specify minimum 114 inch per foot roof slope water. Section 3207 (a) and Section 2305 (f). Show roof drains and overflows. Size drains per Appendix D of UPC. Section 3207 (a). Show the legal basis to allow roof drainage to flow onto the adjacent property. ft. of undivided area and H-1,2,3,4 or 5 B-2 and B-4 occupancies h,ith over 50,000 sq. occupancies over 15,000 sq. ft. of single floor area- shall have smoke -and heat v&ts per Section 3206. Plastic skylights must be separated from each other by at least 4 feet. Section 5207 (a) 6. Plastic skylights shall not be installed within that portion of a roof located within a distance to property line where openings in exterior walls are prohibited or required to be protected. Section. 5207 (a) 7. te6. Provide skylight details to show compliance with Chanter 34 and Section 5207 or Drovide GCBC or other recognized approval listink. FwC 9/&& 5 mi 0.d PcAwi &. Provide plastx roof panel details to show / compliance with Section 5206 or provide ICBO or other recognized approval listing. Show attic ventilation. Minimum vent area is at least 50 percent of the,required vent is at 11150 of attic area or 1/300 of attic area if least 3 feet above eave or cornice vents. Section 3205 (c). installed within such chutes at alternate floors. Sprinkler heads shall be accessible for servicing. Section 3802 (b). Fire sminklers are reauired in retail sales rooms ;here the floor &ea exceeds 12,000 sq. ft. on any floor or 24,000 sq. ft. on all floors or in B-2 retail sales occupancies more than three stories in height. Section 3802. Fire sprinklers are required in H occupancies when exceeding the areas in Section 3802 (f). Provide fire sprinklers in rooms used by the occupants for the consumption of alcoholic beverages when the total area of unseparated rooms exceeds 5000 square feet. For uses to be considered as separated, a one-hour occupancy separation is required. Section 3802 (c). 2{. Provide fire sprinklers Section 506, 507, 508 or 3802. See also jurisdiction ordinance. Note on the plans: "When serving more than 100 sprinltler heads, automatic sprinkler systems shall be supervised by an approved central, proprietary or remote, station service, or shall be provided with a local alarm which will give an audible signal at a constantly attended location." Section 3803. .. ;./ ;p" S. Provide class __ standpipes per Section 3807. A first story as allowed by Section 702 shall be included in determining the number of stories when determining if standpipes are required. Section 3806. KXJNMTION Provide a copy of the project soil report prepared by a California licensed architect or civil engineer. The report shall include foundation design recommendations based on the eneineer's findines and shall comlv with UBC - Sekion 2905. ._ the soils expansion index and the design confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soil report are properly 6' mcorporated into the plans. required by the soil report). The foundation plan does not comply with the following soil report recomendation(s) for this project ~~ Provide notes on the foundation plan listing the soils reoort recomendations for foundation slab and buiiding pad preparation. z' C~CPAC?~~~ F'N- sw rz-za'c The soils engineer recomended that helshe review the foundation excavations. Note on the foundation plan that "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building Department foundation building official in writing that: inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the 1. The building pad was prepared in 2. The utility trenches have been properly accordance with the soils report, backfilled and compacted, and 3. The foundation wcavations'oomply with the intent of the. soils report". Provide spread footings for; concentrated loads designed for 1,000 psf soil bearing or per bearing value as determined by an engineer or architect. Chapter 29. 2d Show height of all foundation walls. Chapter or fill slopes and show slope and heights of . Show distance from foundation to edge of cut cuts and fills. Chapter 29. . Note on the plans that wood shall be 6 inches above finish grade. Section 2907(a). Note on plans that surface water will drain away from building and show drainage pattern and key elevations. Section 2905 (f). p. Dimension foundations per Table 29-A. 'Floors - Thickness of SUDDOrted* Stemall Width DeDth FootinP. 1 6" 12" 12" 2 6'' 8" 3 10" 15" 18" 18" 24" 7" a" Swer.'Foundations my support a roof in addition to the .I floors. Where only a roof is supported, use foundation for one floor. For buildings adjacent to slopes steeper than ' 3:1, note on the plans: top of any exterior foundation shall extend "On graded sites, the above the elevations of the street gutter at point of discharge or the inlet of an approved drainage device a minimum of 12 inches plus 2 percent." Provide elevations on the site plan to show compliance. Section 2907 (d) 5. 2)d. Show foundation sills to be pressure treated, or equal. Section 2516 (c) 3. . Show foundation bolt size and spacing. Foundation bolt size and spacing for shear walls mat be clearly shown on the foundation plan. Section 2907 (e). power driven pins. Show edge and end distance Specify size, ICBO number and manufacturer of and spacing. Section 306 (f). Show size, embedment and location of hold down anchors on foundation plan. Section 2303(b) 1*. be tied in place prior to foundation Note on the plans that hold down anchors must inspection. Show adequate footings under all bearing walls and shear walls. Section 2907 (b). z$. Show stepped footings for slopes steeper than 1:lO. Section 2907 (c). : X$. Show minimum 18 inch clearance from grade to bottom of floor joists and minimum 12 inch clearance to bottom of girders. Section 2516 Show minimum under floor access of 18 inches by On the cover sheet of the plans, specify any 24 inches. Section 2516 (c) 2. items requiring special inspection, in a Show minimum under floor ventilation equal to a format similar to that shown below or sticky back. area. Openings shall be as close to comers as 1 sq. ft. for each 150 sq. ft. of under floor practicable and shall provide cross ventilation on at least two approximately opposite sides. Section 2516 (c) 6. Show veneer support and connections in Seismic Zones 3 and 4, comply with Section 3002, 4, 5, 6 and Section 2515 .(a) regarding ties and P9 wire in horizontal joints. In addition to the reaular insnections. the Ru)UIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS followine checked item; will also reahre Special inspection in accordance with Sec. 306 of the Uniform Building Code. ~~~ ~~~~ ~~ 1"- - ITM REO. IF WNARKS QIECKED SOILS COMPLIANCE PRIOR To FOUNDATION INSP. Show height and construction details of all STRUCTURAL CONCRETE masonry walls. Chapter X. OVER 2500 PSI whichever is greater. Cross grain tznsion or bending in wood ledgers is not permitted. Section 2310. floor and roof connections to c (JN '.e2 TL walls. Connection shall resist 200 pounds per lineal foot or the actual desim load, FIELD WING .pREsmssED STEEL Provide details for dy proofing the foundation walls, below frnish grade, where usable space exists on the interior side of the walls. Section 1707 (d). Show a minimum 2" air space and flashing between planter and building walls. Section 2516 (c) 7. Provide complete structural details on the plans with cross referencing as needed to show the structural framing will comply with the design calculations and building code requirements. Provide minimum structural specifications on the plans to show that all structural materials will comply with the design calculations and building code requirements. HIGH STRENGM BOLTS mANSION ANCHORS SPECIAL MASONRY SPRAYED ON FIRE PRWFING PILES/cAISSOh'S DESIGNER-SPECIFIED Ollw Where special inspection is required for masonry, note on the plans that prism tests shall be performed in accordance with Section 2405. Section 2406(c)1. wall and main cross partition shall be braced Show wall bracing. hrery exterior wood stud at each end and at least every 25 feet of equivalent. Section 2517 (9) 3. length with 1 x 6 diagonal let-in braces or 4 9. Note cross bridging or blocking. Floor joists and rafters 12" or more in depth shall be supported laterally by bridging at intervals held in line. Section 2506(h), 2517. not exceeding 8 feet, unless both edges are m- 55r "A- T, ' m-L *IC w /Fi Show blocking at end and at supports of floor joists, and for rafters at exterior walls. Section 2517 (d) 3. Show soiid blocking at; ridge line. and at exterior walls on trussed roofs. Section 2506 (h), Section 2517 (h). nL CoAnJ wfE&C Cb+UTiLk;s- c I LtAPJOh. ,7y 1.33 SMC5S .'NWL IS ,q'RL&Y lNCLVDILD IN % ALC~~APLL 2/14/90 14 Bearing partitions, perpendicular to joists, shall not be offset from supporting girders, beams, walls or partitions, more than the depth of the joists. Section 2517 (d) 5. ;ix F 9 0 . Show rafter ties. Rafter ties shall be spaced not more than 4 feet on center and be just above the ceiling joists, where rafters and ceiling joists are not parallel. Section 2517 (h) 4. . Show rafter purlin braces to be not less than 45 degrees to the horizontal. Section 2517(h)5. . Show 1/2" minimum clearance between top plate of interior partitions and bottom chord of trusses. designed). (To ensure loading will be as 246 Show or note fire stops at the following locations per Section 2516 (f): a. b. C. d. partitions, including furred spaces, at the in concealed spaces of stud walls and ceiling and floor levels and at 10 foot intervals along the length of the wall. at all interconnections between concealed vertical and horizontal spaces such as occur at soffits, drop ceilings and cove ceilings; in concealed spaces between stair stringers at the top and bottom of the nm and between studs along and in line with the TUI~ of stairs if the walls under the stairs are unfinished; and chimeys, fireplaces and similar openings in openings around vents, pipes, ducts, which afford a passage for fire at ceiling materials. and floor levels, with noncombustible buildings having floors and roofs of wood ame construction, other than dwelling or tel occupancies, draft stop the area between e ceiline and floor above SO that no ncealed space exceeds .1,000 s.f. and no risontal dimension exceeds 60 L.F. (if space s sprinklers, then'3,OOO s.f. and 100 L.F.). ction 2516(f). In buildings havi_ng floors and roofs of 'wood hotel occupancies, draft stop the area between frame construction, other than dwelling or the ceiline and roof above SO that no concealed space exceeds 3,000 s. f . and no horizontal dimension exceeds 60 L.F. (if space has sprinklers, then 9,000 s.f. and 100 L.F.). Section 2516(f). , 9. Show double top plate with minimum I&'' lap splice. Section 2517 (9) 2. f 25-9. 0. Show nailing will be in compliance with Table Show stud size and spacing. Maximum allowable stud heights; bearing wall: 2 x 4 and 2 x 6 max. 10'; non-bearing: 2 x 4 max. 14', 2 x 6 max. 20'. Table 25-R-3. 2,d. Studs supporting two floors, a roof and Table 25-R-3. ceiling mst be 3 x 4 or 2 x 6 at 16" O.C. Note an A.I.T.C. Certificate of Compliance for glued laminated wood members shall be given to the building inspector prior to installation. Section 2505. ;";. Detail all post to beam and post to footing plan. Section 2516 (m). connections and reference the detail to the Detail shear transfer connections, including roof and floor diaphragms, to shear walls. Section 2513. . Specify nail size and spacing for all shear h'alls, floor and roof diaphragms. Indicate required blocking. Maintain maximum diaphragm dimension ratios. (Tables 25 I, 3, K) and Section 4714 (d). . Provide truss details and tws calculations @ for this project. Specify on the plans the truss identification numbers. Provide roof framing plan and floor framing 3"' plan. Section 302 (d). y. Provide framing sections through Section 302 (d). 0. Speclfy all header sizes for opening over 4' dl. Provide calculations for main vertical and ' ride: Section 2517 (9) 5. ' horizontal framing members and post footings. Section 302 (d). panels, shear transfer and related. Section Provide calculations for lateral loads, shear 302 (a) 7. In Seismic Zones 3 and 4, the allowable shear values for drywall in Table 47-1 mst be reduced 50% for earthquake loading. This does not apply to wind loading. 2/14/90 15 show on the plans all structural requirements developed in the structural calculations. ,.&. Columns and posts located on concrete or masonry floors or decks exposed to the weather or to water splash or in basements and which support permanent structures shall be supported by concrete piers or metal pedestals projecting above floors unless approved wood of natural resistance to decay or treat wood is used. Section 2516 (e) 4. Individual concrete or masonry piers shall project at least 8 inches above exposed ground unless the columns or posts which they support are of approved wood. of natural resistance to decay or treated wood is used. Section 2516 (c) 4. Show unenclosed floor and roof openings, open and glazed sides of landings and ramps, balconies or porches more than 30" above grade or floor, and roofs used for other than height guardrail, through which a 6" sphere service to the building have 42" minimum cannot pass, and designed for 20 lbs. per lin. ft. aDDlied horizontallv at ton rail (50 lbs. . Provide platform and stage construction, vents, as per Chapter 39. including occupancy separations and roof Provide at least one drinking fountain for each floor level in Group A occupancies. Section 605. P 67. Specify plywood grade and panel identification index. Table 255-1. Show that aisles and seats comply with 3315 and 3316. as a beam. Section 2517 (h). 8. When roof pitch is less than 3:12, design ridge 2d. If foundation cripple wall studs are less than 14", framing shall be solid blocking or the cripple studs sheathed with plywood. Section 2517 (g) 4. / shall be 3 inch by 4 inch or 2 inches by 6 . Cripple wall studs exceeding 4 feet in height inches when supporting 2 stories. Section 2517 (g) 4, Show plywood sheathing over exposed eaves, or other weather exposed areas, is "bonded with exterior clue." Plvwood used for exterior wall covering ;hall be the exterior type. Section 2516 (g)3, 2516(i). Ridges, hips, and valleys shall be at least one size larger than supported rafters. Section 2517 (h) 3. across the beaq at the ridge support. Section In open beam construction, provide strap ties 2501 (b). v. nIISCgLTAABOOS Parking garages shall have an unobstructed headroom clearance of not less than 7"O" above the finish floor to any ceiling, beam, pipe or similar construction. Section 702 (b). Provide details of restrooms to show compliance and showers. 7- with Section 510 (b), regarding floors, walls If both sexes will be employed and the number of employees exceeds four, provide separate toilet facilities for men and women. If "both sexes will be employed and the total number of employees will not exceed four", and only one restroom is provided, note the words in quotation above on the floor plan. Section 705 Buildings housing Group A Occupancies shall front directly upon or have access to a public access to the public street shall be a minimum street not less than 20 feet in width. The 20-foot-wide right-of-way, unobstructed and maintained only as access to the public street. The main entrance to the building shall be located on a public street or on the access way. Section 603. provided. (UBC Table 23-P) is be. ii -wir+----p -inch" ''4 .sp3ayed"g&"a@e d .nPe "3 -3~. st& (adequate resist the vertlcal component from lateral loads) fastened to the main mer shall be extended to and fastened to the structural members of the roof or floor above. These horizontal restraint points shall be placed 12 feet O.C. in both directions with the first point within 6 feet of each wall. Attachment of restraint wires to the structure above shall be adequate for the load imposed. UBC Standard 47-18. W. lXUE 24 HNUIICAPPED ACCFSS ; @Provide note vd details on the plans to show complrance nth the enclosed Handicapped Access (heck List. Handicapped access requirements may be more restrictive than the UBC . ",e jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 6191560-1468, to perform the plan check for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan check items, at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. Enclosures: Width of clear area on the swing side of the door shall extend 24" past strike jamb for exterior doors and 18" past strike jamb for interior doors. 2-3304(i.l) WWY oowrs 00 do7 CwLr J The space between two consecutive doors (vestibule) shall provide a minimum of 48" clear depth between the open door and a second closed door.Doors in a series at a vestibule shall swing in the between them. 2-3304(i.1) same direction, or away from the space / For corridors over 200 feet long, see special requirements of Sec. 2-3305(b)2. 8( -Fs / Floors of a given story shall be a comon level throughout or shall be connected by pedestrian ramps, passenger elevators, or s pecial access lifts. ' 2-522(e) D =AIRwAys /d a Nosing shall not project more than J HOIE: Only applies where disabled access is provided or mquired to otber levels. Treads shall have smooth, rounded exposed edges and be slip resistant. 2- 3306(s) 1-1/2 inches past face of the riser below. 2-3306(s) Risers shall be sufficiently solid. 2-3306(s) d/A L The upper approach and lower tread of each flieht of stairs shall be =ked with a iontrasting colored strip 2" in width. 2-3306(r) On exterior stairs, tread shall be marked as noted above. 2-3306(r) Handrails._are required on & side of stairway. 2-3306 Handrails shall be located 30" to 34" above nosing,extend 12" beyond top riser and 12" plus tread width beyond bottom nosing and returned to wall/newel post. 2-3306(j.l). So as not to conflict with height of 34". the UBC, handrails should be shown at a J Handrails shail be 1-114" to 2" in gripping cross section and 1-1/2" clear of wall. 2-3306(j.1) J Approved stairday . identification signs all enclosed stairways in buildings two shall be located at each floor level in or more stories in height. The sign shall identify the stairway, indicate whether there is roof access, the floor level, and the upper and lower terminus of the stairway. The information shall be presented using raised Arabic numerals and raised braille symbols which conform to Section 522(b)3. The sign shall be floor landing immediately adjacent to the located approximately 5 feet above the door on the strike side. Siens shall comply with requirements oi. U.B.C. Standard No. 33-2. ATORS a. Provide clear inside elevator car dimensions as required by U.B.C. Section 5103(d) 6 and Title 24 2-5103(d.l). 1. At least one elevator in buildings Ir or more stories in height: 80" by 54", with a 42-inch side slide door. Applies only to: high-rise buildings, AlE/I occupancies, State-owned buildings, residential care homes, hotels, motels, apartments and condominiums. 2. Elevctor in buildings more than two stories or buildings where disabled access is required to upper level(s): 68" by 54", with a minh clear door width of 36". * 3. Elevators other than in (b) above serving less than 50 occupants shall have a minimum inside platform of 4 minimum clear door width of 36 inches. feet 6 jnches by 4 feet 6 inches and a b. Raised Braille markings and Arabic numerals are required on-control buttons and door jambs. 2-5103(d.1) ~~~ ~~~ SAKEARX PACKLEES ACCESS on accessible floors, sanltaq facilities shall be made accessible to physically handicapped. (2-511.1(a)) /Lk~hlqt NU rmEi- Doorways shall have 32" minimum clear ,d There shall be a .level area with 60" clear depth in the direction of the door swing, and a level area with U" clear depth in opposite direction of door swing. 2-511.l(a) 4u kc&. fit7 /d opening width. 2-511.1 @ HULTIPLE ACCOHHODATION TOILFT FACILIIIES 0 high a Provide clear area 60" diameter x 27" - or clear s ace 56" x 63" x 27" 5~~2. ry ALL R6JTlr66nJ high. 2-511.l(ap 4 Doors (other than handicap compartment) @ URINI\LS are not to encroach more than 12" into above mentioned clear space. 2-511.l(a) .. - a. Where urinals are provided, the rim of at least one shall nroiect 14" from the wall Provide a 28" clear space between water between water closet and wall. closet and fixture or 32" clear space 2-511.l(al 0 .. d. A 48" long clear space is required in front of water closet. A 60" clear space is required when the toilet coIpartment has a side door. 2-511.l(a) and be located i7" maximum above floor. 5-1503(a) -~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~" b. The force required to activate the flush valve shall be 5 lbs. maximum and located U" maximum above floor. 5-1503(b) C. Provide 30" x 48" clear floor space for h fornard approach. 2-511.l(b) ._ ater closet compartment door to provide @h clear width for end entry +nd 34" clear width for side entry. Door to be a. Provide 30" x 48" clear floor space for foward approach. Said clear floor space self-closing. 2-511.l(a) may include knee and toe space under lavatory described below. 2-511.l(b) (l7) MVATORIES f;;;) SINGLE ACCMMODATION TOILR FACILITIES "a Water closet shall be located 28" from a b. Minh clear space in front of water .. fixture or 32" from a wall. 2-511.l(a) b. Provide clear space beneath lavatories 29" high by 30" wide by 8" deep at top and 9". high by 30" wide by 17" deep at bottom from front of lavatory (toe soace). The maximum counter surface closet shall be 48". 2-511.l(a) / In an existing building, a single accommodation toilet facility may have a space 36" wide x 48 " long in fron: of water closet. 2-511.l(a) @ GRAB BM(S AT WATER CLOSn a. he at side 42'' long extending 24" ' front of water closet; one at r e.d-gj9 long centered on water closet; mounted 33" above floor. Where a tmk- high as 36". 2-511.l(a) type toilet is used, grab bar may be as b. Bars shall be 1-114" to 1-112" in diameter with 1-112" clearance to wall. 2-511.l(a) C. Bar fasteners and mounting support shall be able to withsthd 250 lbs./ft. in bending, shear and tension. 2-511.l(a) . 0 15. wlcw msn a. Height of water closet seat shall be 17" - to 19" above floor. .5-1502 b. Controls shall be operable with one hand, and shall not require tight grasping, pinching or twisting of the wrist. 5-1502 c. Controls for the flush valves shall be mounted on the wide side of toilet areas, no more than 44" above the floor. 5-1502 d. The force required to activate controls Shall be no greater than 5 pounds force. 5-1502 h'eighi should be 34". 5-1504(a) c. Hot water and drain pipes under lavatories shall be insulated. 5-15011(b) d. Faucet controls and operating mechanism (operable with one hand) shall be of the Dlnchine or twistine of the wrist (such tFe not requiring tight grasping, ks 1eve;-operated) &d an operating force - not exceeding 5 lbs. 5-15011(c) e. If self-closine .valves are used. thev - shall renain open for at leait io seconds. 5-1504(c) F-? TOILR ROO% ACCESSORZES a. Mirror bottom edge shall be located 40" maximum above floor. 2-511.l(b) b. Toilet tissue disnensers shall be mounted within 12" from tie front edge of toilet seat. 2-511.l(b) C. Operating parts of dispensing and disposal fixtures (towels, waste, coin slots, etc.) shall be within 40" of floor. 2-511.l(b) @ SANITARY FACILITIES IDENTIFICATION a. On dooniays leaaing to sanitary facilities the symbols to be provided are 12" Equilateral triangle for men, 12" diameter circle for women, and 114" thick, centered on door, 60" high and contrasting color. Unisex facilities shall be identified by the circle with the triangle superimposed within the circle. 2-511.l(a) I I o speed up the recheck process,note on this lis the revised plans. specifications. Submit plan showing location of all services. Submit complete one-line diagram of service and feeders. Indicate the grounding system to be installed for building service. Indicate ampere interrupting capacities equipment. NEC 230-65/110-9. (AIC) of service and subservice Indicate sizes of fuses andlor circuit breakers. MEL ZZ73”) elcc: sw Indicate fuse svmbols to show fault currents are limited to 10,000 amps on branch circuits, i.e. JJN, LCL. If fuses are not used to limit fault currents on branch circuits to 10,000 amps, specify method to be used. Submit plan showing location of all switchboards. Indicate dimension of switchboards and more. NEC 110-16(c). control panels rated 1200 amperes or Submit plan showing location of all transformers. - secondary side of transformers. hTC 240- 21/384-16(d). st5 6.4 ,Id. Submit plan showing location of all panels. #. Submit panel schedules. 16. Specify conduit and wire sizes. 2”. Specify aluminum or copper conductors and 0 type of insulation. 18. Show approximate length of feeders. @ Szfy ‘z$trode conductor size and type wire. (aluminum or copper) ._ .e - ,,e .. >,?.!= , lir ,$. Submit electrical load calculations. $. Indicate existing main service size. ,jd. Indicate existing main service load. 3”: Indicate new additional loads. Indicate wiring method, i.e. R%C, metal flex. 0 25. Show exit signs on the electrical 3314 of the 1988 UBC, provide two sources lighting plan(s). As per Sec. 3313 and of power to exit s5g~- -..,: & illumination. WUFgTUeIhlG $. Provide receptacle(s) within 25‘ of the @ Indicate the grounding system to be / WAC AIC units. UMC Section 509. installed for transformers. NEC 250- 26(c). *‘NWREST ~L-ET~c~DE” Provide multiple switch lighting controls i3B 5TEEL) VFER,UO V.‘&TE~ per CAC, Title 24, 2-5319. ?I?Z, ) Any questions on electrical please contact the plan checker shown above, at Esgil Corporation at (619)fbS-;+ . .- ' t ..* UN~ORM BUILDING CODE 1988 EDITION Exlt lllumlnatloq SX. 3313. (a) General. Except within individual dwelling units, guest rooms and sleeping rooms, exits shall be illuminated at any time the building is occupied with light having intensity of not less than 1 footcandle at floor level. i EXCEPTION: In auditoriums, theaters, concen or opcra halls and similar as- sembly uys, the illumination at floor level may be reduced during pcrformanccs Io not less than 0.2 footcandle. Fmtures required for exit illumination shall be supplied from sepaiate sources of power where nquired by Subsection (b). @I SeDarate sources of wwer. The power supply for exit illumination shall normally be provided by the premises' wiring system. In the event of its failure, illumination shall be automatically provided from an%mereencv svsterrt for Group 1, Division 1 Occupancies and for all other occupancies where the exiting system serves an occupant load of 100 or more. ~ Section 3310 e) 9. For high-rise buildings, see Section 1807. For smokeproof enclosures, see j *Emereencv systems shall be supplied from storaie batteries or an on-site ' senerator set and the system shall be installed in accordance with the requirements [ of the Electrical Code. Exlt Slsns . .. Sec. 3314. (a) Where Required. Exit signs shall be installed at required exit i. doorways 2nd where otherwise r,ecessary to clezrly indicate the direc:ion of .! egress when L!e exit serves 2n occuDant load of 50 or more.' EXCEF'TIOS: Main exterior exit doors which obviously md clearly arc identi- (b) Graphics. The color and desip of lettering, arrows and other symbols on exit signs shall be in high contrast with their background. Words on the sign shall be in block letten 6 inches in height with a stroke of not less than 3!4 inch. (c) Illumination. Signs shall be internally or externally illuminated bv two elecaic lamos or shall be of an apuroved self-luminous tvw. When the luminance on the face of an exit sign is from an external source, it shall have an intensity of not less than 5.0 footcandles from either lamp. Internally illuminated signs shall provide equivalent luminance. .. .. fiable as exics need not be signed when approved by the building official. ,. . . .. ... __ . .. (d) Power Supply. Current supply to one of the lamps for exit signs shall be provided by the premises' wirine system. Power to the other lam0 sh?l be from storaee batteries or an on-site generator set and the system shall be installed in accordance with the Elecaical Code. For high-rise buildings, see Section 1807.: ? ESGIL CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO. CA 02 123 (619) 560-1468 - DATE : Yh-7 40 JURISDICTION: c &LZBAD FILE COPY PLAN CHECK NO: 90- ST6 SET : 1 - DUPS PROJECT ADDRESS: =DESIGNER /SIX ASmN &V6 PROJECT NAME: OKKr / i-,.JDl"T/ "AetKcML 0 necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply 0 with the jurisdiction's building codes when. minor deficien- cies identified are resolved and checked by building department staff. 0 identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected The plans transmitted herewith hsve significant deficiencies and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted heredith is for your information. plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the @ The plans are being held at Esgil Corp. until corrected 0 jurisdiction to return to the applicant contact person. @ The appl'icant's. copy of the check list has been sent to: 6 ENE CWo AfA .. 53T - duC7'X N16HuAY lo/ 5oc4da akALU C,4 SU?T @ Esgil staff did not advise the applicant contact person that 0 Esgil staff did advise applicant that the plan check has plan check has been completed.,', been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted: Telephone # - 0 REMARKS: By : ? Ffi L lteR Enclosures: ESGIL CORPORATION 14 @GA OAA Ow IDM WcoRmzrIMISleKr GlmXAL.a?HmuAL Date plans received by jurisdiction: Date plans received by Esgil Corp.: y/9 Date initial plan check completed: Yh7 By: ? hSCttkK Applicant contact person: GfiNL CMPD Tel . FORWORD: PLEASgREm Plan check is limited to technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. The plan check is based on regulations You may have other corrections based on laws and enforced by the Building Inspection Department. ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Present California law mandates that construction comply with Title 24 and the applicable model code editions adopted, with or without changes, by the various state agencies authorized to propose building regulations for enforcement at the local 1988 UBC. level. Code sections cited are based on the Ihe circled items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sac. 303 (c), 1988 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To SDeed UD the recheck Drocess. note on this list addressed, i.e.. ~lan sheet. sDecification, etc. jor a COW) where each correction item has been Be sure to enclose the marked UD list when vou submit the revised ~lan~. A. pwls @ Pleafe maice all corrections on the original traclngs and submit two new sets of prints, and any original plan sets that may have been returned to you by the jurisdiction, to: Esgil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123, (619) 560-1468. ,d. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints, and any original plan sets thet may have been returned to you by the jurisdiction, to: The jurisdiction's building department. B. P Provide the site address and a vicinity sketch on the Title Sheet. Provide the names, addresses and telephone J numbers of the owner and the responsible design Drofessionals on the Title Sheet. @' Provide a note with the building data legend P grading permit is required for this project. /16 stating that yards used for area increases shall be permanently maintained. Indicate on the Title Sheet whether or not a P Provide a statement on the Title Sheet of the plans that this project shall comply with Title 24 and 1988 UBC, UHC and UPC and 1987 NEC . hazardous materials will be stored andlor used Provide a note on the plans indicating if any within the building which exceed the quantities listed in UBC Tables 9-A and 9-B. 8~s- SCL au- ,d. Specify the uses of all rooms or areas. c. smm Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to easements, streets, existing and proposed scale. Show north arrow, property lines, buildings and stmctures. h @ Provide a statement on the site plan stating: (?) All sheets of the plans and the first sheet of "All property lines, easements and buildings, - the calculations are required to be signed by the California licensed architect or engineer responsible for the plan preparation. Please date of license expiration and the date the include the California license number, seal, plans are signed. Business and Professions Code. Show on the Title Sheet all buildings, application. Any portion of the project shown structures, walls, etc. included under this buildine Demit amlication filed should be on the site plan that is not included with the clearly-id'entified 'is "not included" on the site plan or Title Sheet. a Provide a Building Code Data Legend on the Title Sheet. Include the following code information for each building proposed: + Occupancy Group &Z .. ' 7 to exceed allowable area in Table if applicable) 96@, S-VW r both &sting and proposed, are shown on this site ~lan". buildings to remain, existing buildings to be Clearly designate on the site plan existing demolished, buildings to be constructed under this permit and any proposed future buildings. @ Clearly designate any side yards used to r' justify increases in allowable area based on Section 506. . Show on the site plan all proposed walls, heights on the plans. Provide construction retaining walls and fences. Specify their details if a part of this permit. Clearly dimension building setbacks from property lines, street centerlines, and from all adjacent buildings and structures on the site plan. .. It” I. Rooflceiling and floorlceiling assemblies must be of one-hour construction. Detail fire assemblies on plans along with their ICBO number or other I.D. number from the Fire- Resistive Design Manual published by the Gypsum Assoc. or U.L. number or item number from Table 43-c. UBC. Detail water heater vents located inside fire- resistive wall construction or within fire- resistive shafts. Section 1706 (a). Clearly identify location and hourly fire- resistive rating of vertical shafts on the plans. Provide cons&ruction details showing location of fire dmers and how fire resistivity will be mainta&d. at floors-bnd roofs. Section 1706. Detail column fire protection per Table 43-A in garage areas per Section 4303 (b) 5. As a the UBC and specify column impact protection in minimum, show a 22 ga. steel jacket around each column to a height of 3 feet above the ground for impact protection. more than one floor or roof must be Structural members such as beams supporting individually fire protected. (Section 4303 (b) 6.) Detail required protection. Clearly specify minimum thickness of walls and slabs to provide -hour fire-resistive rating per Table 43-B and C. Clearly specify minimum cover for bonded reinforcing at - fire-rated floors, fire rated columns, specify minium cover for prestressed concrete fire rated beams. Clearly tendons per Section 4303 (c) 3. Detail all plumbing and electrical penetrations at occupancy, area, corridor or other fire separation walls as specified in Section 4304 (e). Detail all furred ceilings as required in Section 4203. Show fire-retardant treated wood where necessary. Clearly label and identify on the plans the fire-resistive corridors, ’ area separation walls, shafts, occupancy separation walls and floors. exit courts less than 10 feet wide and .. exit enclosures, along with their hourly ratings. Section 302 (a). Foam plastics shall not bs used as interior finish except as provided in Section 1712. When walls and ceiling are required to be fire-resistive or noncombustible, the finish material shall be applied directly against such fire-resistive or noncombustible construction or to furring strips not exceeding 1-314 inches. The furred space material or fire stopped not to exceed 8 feet shall be filled with inorganic or Class I in any direction. Section 4203, 1. When finish materials are set out or dropped more than 1-314 inches from fire-rated walls or ceilings the finish material shall be Class I or sprinklered on both sides or attached to noncombustible backing or furring strips. Section 4203, 2. Hangers and assembly members of dropped ceilings below a one-hour ceiling assembly shall be noncombustible materials except in Types I11 and V construction, where fire- retardant treated wood may be used. Section 4203, 2. All interior wall or ceiling finishes less than 114 inch thick shall be applied directly against a noncombustible backing unless it is in accordance with an approved tested assembly. Section 4203, 4. Provide a note on the plans or on the finish schedule, ”Wall and ceiling materials shall not exceed the flame soread classifications in P. al. + A -hour occupancy separation is required between Aoccupancy and the Tables 43-A, B, C and Chapter 43. (See NL occupancy. Table 5-B, Section 503 (d), exceptions in Section 503) - and clerical offices and slmllar rooms need not be separated from other occupancies provided they are less than 25 Dercent of the floor area of the maior use and iot related to an H-2 or H-3 “occupancy. Section 503 (a). ” Provide - assemblies in the - -hour fire-resistive door separation. Section 503 (c). -hour occupancy A B-1 occupancy in the basement or first story of a building housing a group B, Division 2 occupancy may be classed as a separate building. The building above may also be considered a separate and distinct building for the purpose of area limitation, limitation of number of stories and type of construction ONLY if the conditions of Section 702 are met: a. B-1 is Type I construction. b. B-l/B-2 is separated by a three-hour occupancy separation. c. B-1 is restricted to passenger vehicle storage, entry lobbies,.laundry rooms and mechanical equipment ‘rooms- :(no storage, recreation room, etc.). d. The mavinam building height does not exceed the limits in Table 5-D for the least type of construction. The Type I construction is required to have protected openings when located within 20 feet from a property line or centerline of a public way. Section 1803 (b). permitted in exterior walls less than 5 feet In Type I construction, no openings are from a property line. Section 1803 (b). All openings in floors forming a three-hour separation shall be protected by vertical enclosures above and below the opening. The walls of such enclosures shall be not less than two-hour fire-resistive construction, and openings therein shall be protected by a one and one-half-hour assembly. Section 503 (c) 2. Tables 43-A, B, C and Chapter 43. Structural members supporting an occupancy rating as the separation. Section 503 (b). separation must have the same fire-resistive No weninrrs are allowed in a four-hour fire- resistive- occupancy separation wall. section 503 (c). Openings in a three-hour fire-resistive assembly, and openings may not exceed 25 separatlon shall be protected by a three-hour percent of the length of wall in the story and no single opening shall exceed 120 sq. ft. Section 503 (c). A two-hour fire-resistive separation shall be ; not less than two-hour fire-resistive construction. Openings shall be protected by a one and one-half-hour assembly. Section 503 (c). A one-hour fire-resistive separation shall be not less than one-hour fire-resistive construction. Openings shall be protected by a one-hour assembly. Section 503 (c). @ Occupancy separation wall penetrations must be either ferrous or copper and fire-stopped. Steel electrical outlet boxes shall not exceed exceed one hundred square inches per one sixteen square inches and further, shall not hundred square feet of wall, may be inbullled distance of twenty-four inches when on and shall be separated by a horizontal opposite sides of a wall. Section 4304 (e). 0 ’. e, F 100 Clarlfy that wiring within concealed spaces complles with the Mechanical Code and UBC Section 4305 (e). 101 Ducts penetrating one or two-hour occupancy fire door is required for three-hour separation walls must have fire dampers. A separations. Section 4306 (j). Usable space under the first story shall be usable space as required for one-hour fire- enclosed and shall be separated from the non- .. usable space shall be self-closing, of resistive construction and the door to the noncombustible construction or solid wood core, not less than 1-314 inches in thickness. Section 1703. 0 f 103 Show the basis for the rating of the occupancy Table 43-A, B, C; Gypsum Fire-Resistive Design separation you propose, i.e., Item number in Manual; U.L., etc. Unless the entire building is sprinklered, storage areas in excess of 1000 sq. ft. (3000 othewise required to be) in connection with sq. ft. if storage area is sprinklered and not public areas by a one-hour fire-resistive sales occupancies shall be separated from occupancy separation. Section 702 (b). K- tB/ In all occupancies, floors above the first not less than two exits. Section 3303 (a). story having 10 or more occupants, shall have In areas where the occupant load exceeds -, two exits are required. See . Table 33-A. . Rooms with more than 10 occupants may have one exit through adjoining room. Revise exits to comply. Section 3303(e). ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ StL bL1U.d Exits should have a minimrrm separation of one- half the maxh overall diagonal dimension of the building or area served. Section 3303 (c). 5et 4Llm.I .. .( f The maximum number of required exits and their required separation must be maintained until egress is provided from the structure. Section 3303 (a). Where a required exit enters a yard or court the minimum width of the vard or court shall be ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ 44" and the yard must be -unobstructed and lead to a public way. Section 3311 (b), Section 3301 (b). . Where required exits enter an exit court (see definition, Section 404 and 3301), the exit court must discharge into a public way or exit passageway. The exits from the exit court shall comply with Section 3311 (d) requirements for width, number, and protection of walls and openings when the occupant load exceeds 9. 2. Qlange in width in a exit court shall be effected gradually by a guardrail at least 36 inches hieh and makine an ande of not more than 30 dzgrees with &e axis of the court. Section 3311 (b). Walls of exit passageways shall be without openings except exits and shall have walls, floors and ceilings of the same fire- resistance required for the building, with a minimum one-hour fire-resistive construction. Exit openings in the walls shall be protected by a three-fourths-hour assembly. Section 3312 (a). Exit doors should be openable from the inside wlthout the use of a key, s ecial knowledge, or effort. Section 3304(cp [Note that exit doors serving 10 or less occupants may have a night latch, dead bolt, or security chain per Title 24, 2-3304 (c).] from assembly rooms with 50 or more occupants shall not be provided with a latch or lock unless it is panic hardware. Section CbNCH euor and gates, within the exit path from an assembly room to a public way, shall not be provided with latches or locks unless they are equipped with panic hardware. Section 3318. 0 122. When additional doors are provided for egress purposes, they shall conform to the width, swing and hardware provisions in Chapter 33. Section 3304(1). Exit doors should be a minimum size of 3 feet by 6 feet 8 inches with a minimum door swing of 90 degrees. Maximum leaf width is 4 feet. Section 3304 (f) and (g). :The net dimension (clear width) at doorways should be used in determining exit widths required by Section 3303 (b). Section 3304 panlc hardware, door swing, etc., the required (f): In consideration of door thicknesses, exit widths have not been furnished. See door Basements require two exits. Section 3303 (a). Total width of exits in feet shall be not less than total occupant load served divided by 50. . Regardless of occupant load, a floor or Tributary occupant load from basements and disabled access is required) below the landing not more than 1 inch (112-inch if stories above shall be per Section 3303 (b) and threshold is required on each side of an exit the maximum width required for any story door. Section 3304 (i). shall be maintained. No point in the building shall be more than 150 feet (200 if sprinklered) from an exterior exit, horizontal exit, enclosed stairway or When a door landing serves an occupant load of 50 or more, doors in any position shall not reduce the landing dimension to less than one half its required width. Section 3304 (j). exit passageway, measured along the path of travel. This may be increased 100 feet if last Door landings shall have a length measured in 150 feet is in a corridor. %, Section 3303 (d) (See exceptiodp). the direction of travel of not less than 44 inches. Section 3304 (j). Double acting doors are . . 'not allowed ':"wh&; serving a tributary occupant load of more +n Doors should not project more than 7 inches 100. or when Dart of a fire assemblv. or art ODened. nor more than one-half of the reouired into the required corridor width when fully .. . of smoke and &aft control assembli;?; or hen equipped with panic hardware. &rid& width when in any position. Siction 3305 (a). Section 3304 (b). Exit doors should swing in the direction of permitted as exit doors if the occupant load Revolving, sliding and overhead doors are not exceeds 9 or the exit door serves a hazardous area. Section 3304 (h). egrees when serving an occupant load of 50 or more or when serving any hazardous area. Section 3304 (b). -8adrrs Ramps required by Table 33-A shall not exceed 1:lZ; other exit ramps 1:8. Ramps steeper than 1:15 shall have handrails as required for stairways. Minimum size landings and landing clearances must be provided. Section 3307. SUIILUAYS Stairway width must be at least 44 inches when serving 50 or more occupants; 36 inches when less than 50, Section 3306 (b). Eighty inch minimum headroom clearance for stairways should be indicated on the plans. Section 3306 (p). Note that this is from a plane tangent to the stairway tread nosing. Stairway handrails should not project more than 3-112 inches into the required width. Trim and stringers may not project more than 1-112 inches. Section 3306 (b). 8 /./ 134. Enclosed usable space under interior or exterior stairways should be protected on the enclosed side as required for one-hour fire- resistive construction. Show 2 x @ 16" O.C. nailers. Section 3306 (m) (n). Landings should not be reduced in width more than 7 inches by a door when fully open. Section 3304 (j). Stairways from upper levels which extend below the level from which egress from the building preclude exiting into such lower levels. is provided, shall have an approved barrier to Section 3306 (h) & 3309 (e). /. Vertical distances between stairway landings are limlted to 12 feet. Section 3306 (i). Stairways should be enclosed as specified in Section 3309: a. Two-hour fire-resistive walls are required in buildings of Type I and 11-F.R. construction, and in all buildings over four stories, and one-hour elsewhere. b. Only exit doors are allowed to open into exit enclosures. C. Doors should be labeled one and one-half hours or one-hour fire assemblies, and noted that the maximum transmitted temperature end point shall not exceed 450 degrees (F) above ambient at the end of 30 minutes of the fire exposure specified in UBC Standard 43-2. d. Exit enclosures should include a corridor on the ground floor extending to the exterior (see exception). Fire-resistive construction should be as required for the exit enclosure, including protected to open into the corridor. openings. Only exit doors are permitted e. An approved barrier is required at the ground floor to prevent people from accidentally continuing to the lower level. f. Usable space is not allowed under the stairs. highest grade should have all exits from the 1 . Occupied floors more than 75 feet above the building in smoke-proof enclosures. Section 3310 (a). All interior stairways and ramps shall be enclosed. In other than H and I occupancies, an enclosure is not required if serving only one adjacent floor and not connected to stairs or corridors serving other floors. Section 3309 (a). Winding and spiral stairways are permitted only in residential occupancies.~ Section 3306 (d). In buildings four or more stories, one stairway must extend to the roof. Section 3306 (0). It must be in a smoke-proof enclosure in buildings over 75 feet in height. A first story as allowed by Section 702 shall be included in determining the number of stories when determining if a stairway to the roof is required. Section 3306 (0). mHandrails: "4 Handrails are required on each side of stairways. Stairways less than 4" wide or stairways serving one dwelling unit may have one handrail (if not open on both sides). Private Stairways (1 tenant) need only 4 have a handrail on one side if 30" or less in height. E. Handrails shall be 34" above nosing of treads (to be consistent with Title 24 and the UBC) and be continuous. Except for private-stairways, at least one rall shall extend 6" beyond top and bottom risers. e. All stairs shall have handrails terminating in a newel or safety post. Section 3306(j). Note: Where access for the disabled is necessary, Title 24 requires handrails on both sides to extend 12 inches beyond the top nosing and 12 inches plus the tread width beyond the bottom nosing. A U 145. lhe handgrip portion of all handrails shall be not less than 1-112 inches nor more than 2 inches in cross-sectional dimension. Handrails projecting from walls shall have at least 1-112 inches between the wall and the handrail. Section 3306 (j). Openings in the exterior wall below or within 10 feet horizontally of an exterior exit protected by a self-closing assembly having a stairway in buildings over two stories shall be three-fourths-hour rating, unless two separate exterior stairways serve an exterior exit balcony. Section 3306 (1). openings in exterior walls below or within 10 feet, measured horizontally, of an exterior assemblies having a three-fourths-hour fire stair shall be protected by self-closing fire protection rating when the stair serves a floor below it. See exception above. Section 3306 level having openings in two or more floors f* (1). P . Buildings four or more stories in height shall have a stairway numbering system complying with Section 3306 (q). n. axFmmrs Corridors and exterior exit balconies serving 10 or more occupants must be a mininnna 44 inches wide and 7 feet high to the lowest projection. Section 3305 (b). When a corridor or exterior exit balcony is accessible to the handicapped, changes in elevation shall be made by means of a ramp. Section 3305 (f). . Corridors serving 30 or more occupants shall have walls and ceilings of one-hour construction except: a. b. C. Corridors greater than 30 feet wide when the occupants have an exit independent from the corridor. Exterior sides of exterior exit balconies. Corridor walls and ceilings need not be of fire-resistive construction within office spaces having an occupant load of 100 or space is located is equipped with an less when the entire story in which the automatic sprinkler system throughout and smoke detectors are installed within the corridor in accordance with their listing. Section 3305 (g). Exit corridors shall not be interrupted by .. reception rooms constructed as for corridors intervening rooms. Foyers, lobbies or shall not be construed as intervening rooms. Section 3305(a). y: One-hour flre-rated corridors shall have door openlngs protected by tight-fitting smoke and draft control assemblies rated 20 minutes, except openings in interior walls of exterior exit balconies. Doors shall be maintained self-closing or be automatic-closing by action of a smoke detector per Section 4306 (b). Doors shall be gasketed to provide a smoke and draft seal where the door meets the stop on sides and top. Section 3305 (h). Total area of all openings, except doors, in any portion of an interior corridor, shall not C exceed 25 ercen of the area of the corridor &E& d which it is separating from the corridor. Such openings shall be protected by fixed, approved 114 inch thick wired glass installed in steel frames. Section 3305 (h). - - Duct penetrations of fire-rated corridor walls and ceilings shall have fire dampers per Section 4306 (j). Elevators serving more than two stories shall not open into required one-hour exit corridors unless protected by an approved smokeldraft control door system. In high rise buildings refer to Section 1807 (h). Section 3305. One-hour corridors shall not be used as an integral part of a duct system. This includes the space above a dropped ceiling within the one-hour corridor. UMC Section 706 (b). Provide a complete architectural section of the corridor, and exterior exit balcony, showing all fire-resistive materials and details of construction for all floor, walls, roof and all penetrations. Section 3305 (g). Ceilings of combustible materials cannot be suspended below the one-hour corridor ceiling. In types I11 or V construction fire retardant treated wood may be used. Section 3305 (g). Corridor walls may terminate at the ceiling hour fire-resistive floor or roof system. only if the ceiling is an element of a one- Section 3305 (g). F r/ i"l 0 " 0 161. When two exlts are required, dead end corridors and exlt balconies are limited to 20 feet. Section 3305 (e). ( CN(JL"DG 13s 162. If a room with an exhaust fan has a door up air will be provided to the room. The door opening into a rated corridor, show how make- cannot be undercut, nor can a louver in the door be provided. Section 3305(h)1. N A. KRIT SI= signs are required since the occupant load xceeds fifty. Show all required exit sign ocations. Section 3314 (a). Show two sources of power for the lamps at exit Show that exits are lighted with at least a one signs. Section 3314(d). foot candle at floor level. Section 3313 (a). Show separate sources of power for exit illumination. (Occupant load exceeds 100) Section 3313 (a). The exit sign locations as shown are not b" adequate. 168. Elevators shall be enclosed in a one-hour shaft where the elevator shall .be in a two hour except in Type I and Type I1 F.R. construction shaft. Section 1706. . hrery opening into an elevator shaft enclosure assembly having a one-hour fire rating in one- shall be protected by a self-closing fire hour shafts and one and one-half hours in two hour shafts. Section 1706. /y' two floor levels shall be vented to the 0. Elevator shafts extending through more than outside. The area of vent shall be not less than 3 112% of the shaft area and a minimum of 3 square feet per elevator. Section 5104. . Elevators in high rise buildings shall comply with Section 1807(b). 0 172. Every elevator lobby or entrance area shall be provided with an approved smoke detector as required by Section 5103(b). Revise the number of elevator cars per hoistway enclosure to comply with Section 5103(a). Provide clear inside elevator car dimensions u as required by U.B.C. Section 5103(d) 6 and Title 24 2-5103(d.l). a. At least one elevator in buildings 4 or more stories in height: 80" by 54", with a 42-inch side slide door. Applies only occupancies, State-owned buildings, residential care homes, hotels, motels, " apartments and condominiums. to: high-rise buildings, AIEII b. Elevator in buildings more than two stories or buildings where disabled access is required to upper level(s): 68" by SO", with a minimum clear door width of 36". c. Elevators other than in (b) above serving less than 50 occupants shall have a minimum inside platform of 4 feet 6 inches by 4 feet 6 inches and a minimum clear door width of 36 inches. 0 175 Provide notes, details or specifications to show the elevator will comply with UBC through 2-5105. Sections 5102-5106 and Title 24 Section 2-5102 Doors other than the hoistway door and the elevator car door are prohibited at the point of access to elevator w, except doors readily openable from the car side. Section 5106. r; 0 P. QASSANDQAZIIIG . Specify on the window schedule the glass type and thickness to show compliance with Table 54-A and B. 178. Glazing, in the same wall plane as a door, must be safety glazing if within 12" of the door and less than 60" above the walking surface, unless the glazing is leaded or faceted glass. Section 5406 (d) 6. Glass in excess of 9 sq. ft. with the lowest edge less the 18 inches above a walking surface horizontal member not less than 1-1/2 inches in shall be safety glazing or shall have a width and located between 24 and 36 inches above the walking surface. Section 5406 (d) 7. 9- RDOP roof covering is required. Table ,Jd Specify roof pitch. . Roof pitch is not adequate for roof covering specified. Specify minimum pitch of 0 ;"" tsd Y f Zyify roof niaterial and application. Chapter 184 Specify ICBO, UL or other recognized listing approval number for roof materials not covered in UBC, -. Specify minimum 114 inch per foot roof slope water. Section 3207 (a) and Section 2305 (f). for drainage or design to support accumulated Show roof drains and overflows. Size drains per Appendix D of UPC. Section 3207 (a). Show the legal basis to allow roof drainage to flow onto the adjacent property. B-2 and B-4 occupancies with over 50,000 sq. ft. of undivided area and H-1,2,3,4 or 5 occuoancies over 15.000 sa. ft. of sinele floor area- shall have smoke -and heat vents per Section 3206. Plastic skylights must be separated from each other by at least 4 feet. Section 5207 (a) 6. Plastic skylights shall not be installed within that portion of a roof located within a distance to property line where openings in protected. Section 5207 (a) 7. exterior walls are prohibited or required to be F. Q 191 Provide skylight details to show compliance with Chapter 34 and Section 5207 or provide ICBO or other recognized approval listing. Provide plastic roof panel details to show compliance with Section 5206 or provide ICBO or other recognized approval listing. Show attic ventilation. Minimum vent area is 1/150 of attic area or 1/300 of attic area if at least 50 percent of the,required vent is at Section 3205 (c). least 3 feet above eave or cornice vents. t.91 /=" q/AIB Provide a minimum 22" x 30" attic access opening (or 30" x 30" if equipment is in attic). Section 3205 (c). R. PIRBEKTMaTrSwG basement when the floor area exceeds 1,500 sq. Fire sprinklers are required for any story or ft. and there is not provided at least 20 sq. ground in each 50 lineal feet or fraction ft. of opening entirely above the adjoining thereof of exterior wall on at least one side, or when openings are provided on only one side and the opposite side is more than 75 feet away. Section 3802 (b). . Fire sprinklers are required in a basement if any portion of a basement is mre than 75 feet from openings in an exterior wall. Section 7. Fire sprinklers are required at the top of rdbbish and linen chutes and in their terminal rooms. Chutes extending through three or more floor shall have additional sprinkler heads installed within such chutes at alternate floors. Sprinkler heads shall be accessible for. servicing. Section 3802 (b). rooms where the floor area exceeds 12,000 sq. . Fire sprinklers are required in retail sales ft. on any floor or 24,000 sq. ft. on all than three stories in height. Section 3802. floors or in B-2 retail sales occupancies mre Fire sprinklers are required in H occupancies '" when exceeding the areas in Section 3802 (f). Provide fire sprinklers in rooms used by the occupants for the consumption of alcoholic beverages when the total area of weparated be considered as separated, a one-hour rooms exceeds 5000 square feet. For uses to occupancy separation is required. Section Section 506, 507, 508 or 3802. See also jurisdiction ordinance. 202. Note on the plans: 'When serving more than 100 sprinkler heads, automatic sprinkler central, proprietary or remote, station systems shall be supervised by an approved alarm which will give an audible signal at a service, or shall be provided with a local constantly attended location." Section 3803. 2/14/90 12 Provide class - 3807. A first story as allowed by Section 702 standpipes per Section shall be included in determinine the number of stories when determining if &andpipes are required. Section 3806. s. €uJmATIoN . Provide a copy of the project soil report prepared by a California licensed architect or civil engineer. The report shall include foundation design recornendations based on the engineer's findings and shall comply with UBC Section 2905. 0 205. Specify :. on . the foundation plan or structural 0 speclflcatlons sheet the soil classification, the soils expansion index and the design bearing capacity of the -foundation. Section SLL BLL- 206. Provide a letter from the soils engineer plan and specifications have been reviewed and confirming that the foundation plan, grading that it has been determined that the recomendations in the soil report are properly the soil report). incorporated into the plans. firsn required by The foundation plan does not comply with the following soil report recomendation(s) for this project 9 208 Provide notes on the foundation plan listing the soils report recornendations for foundation slab and building pad preparation. 0 =' <C"pACi?w f0.L rw K-ZG'rS 209. The soils engineer recornended that helshe review the foundation excavations. Note on the foundation plan that "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building Department foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the building official in writing that: 1. The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report, 2. The utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and 3. The foundation excavationScomply with the ;.ld intent of the soils report". Provide spread footings for; concentrated loads designed for 1,OM) psf soil bearing or per bearing value as determined by an engineer or architect. Chapter 29. 2f 2~ height of all foundation walls. Chapter walls. Chapter 23. Show height of retained earth on all foundation Show distance from foundation to edge of cut cuts and fills. Chapter 29. slopes and show slope and heights of 0 . Note on the plans that wood shall be 6 inches @ above finish grade. Section 2907(a). 215 Note on plans that surface water will drain away from building and show drainage pattern and key elevations. Section 2905 (f). p. Dimension foundations per Table 29-A. 'w SuDDOrted* Stemall Width DeDth Footing Thickness of 1 6" 12" 12" 2 8" 6" 3 10" 15" 18" 18" 24" 7" 8" *Foundations may support a roof in addition to the floors. Where only a roof is supported, use foundation for one floor. ' 3:1, note.on the plans: For buildings adjacent to slopes steeper than "On graded sites, the above the elevations of the street gutter at .. top of any exterior foundation shall extend point of discharge or the inlet of an approved percent." Provide elevations on the site plan drainage device a minimum of 12 inches plus 2 to show compliance. Section 2907 (d) 5. 2#. Show foundation sills to be pressure treated, or equal. Section 2516 (c) 3. . Show foundation bolt size and spacing. Foundation bolt size and spacing for shear walls must be clearly shown on the foundation plan. Section 2907 (e). power driven pins. Show edge and end distance Specify size, ICBO number and manufacturer of and spacing. Section 306 (f). Show size, embedment and location of hold down anchors on foundation plan. Section 2303(b) 4. @ be tied in place prior to foundation Note on the plans that hold down anchors must inspection. and shear walls. Section 2907 (b). Show adequate footings under all bearing walls 211. Show stepped footings for slopes steeper than 2$. Show minimum 18 inch clearance from grade to bottom of floor joists and minimum 12 inch clearance to bottom of girders. Section 2516 1:lO. Section 2907 (c). (c) 2. Show pier size, spacing and depth into undisturbed soil. Table 29-A. s tf" 8 1-s E woss RQckehuu &C Crn55Uu5 Show minimum under floor access of 18 inches by 24 inches. Section 2516 (c) 2. Show minimum under floor ventilation equal to a 1 sq. ft. for each 150 sq. ft. of under floor area. openings shall be as close to comers as practicable and shall provide cross ventilation on at least two approximately opposite sides. Section 2516 (c) 6. 0 236 On the cover sheet of the plans, specify any items requiring special inspection, in a back. format similar to that shown below or sticky RulUIRLD SPECIAL INSPECTIONS In addition to the regular inspections, the following checked items will also require Special Inspection in accordance with Sec. 306 . df the Unifbnn Building Code. T- B!!m?z . Show veneer support and connections in Seismic ,@ Zones 3 and 4, comply with Section 3002, 4, 5, 6 and Section 2515 .(a) regarding ties and t9 wire in horizontal joints. ITpl RIQ. IF R"u(s CHECKED SOILS COMPLIANCE PRIOR To FOUNDATION INSP. Show height and construction details of all masonry walls. Chapter 24. @Show floor and roof connections to leacpler STRUCTURAL CONCRETE OVER 2500 PSI PRESTRESSED STEEL c u&r& 7& walls. Connection shall resist 200 pounds~ pei lineal foot or the actual design load, whichever is greater. Cross grain tension or bending in wood ledgers is not permitted. Section 2310. Provide details for damp proofing the usable space exists on the interior side of the foundation walls, below finish grade, where walls. Section 1707 (d). Show a minimum 2" air space and flashing between planter and building walls. Section 2516 (c) 7. Provide complete structural details on the plans with cross referencing as needed to show the structural framing will comply with the design calculations and building code requirements. Provide minimum structural specifications on the plans to show that all structural materials will comply with the design calculations and building code requirements. FIELD WELDING HIGH STRENGIII BOLTS WANSION ANCHORS SPECIAL MASONRY PROOFING SPRAYED ON FIRE PILES/CAISSONS DESIGNER-SPECIFIED OMER ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ Where special inspection is required for masonry, note on the plans that prism tests shall be performed in accordance with Section 2405. Section 2406(c)1. Show wall bracing. Every exterior wood stud at each end and at least every 25 feet of length with 1 x 4 diagonal let-in braces or equivalent. Section 2517 (9) 3. 2td wall and main cross partition shall be braced 4 Y 9. Note cross bridging or blocking. Floor joists and rafters 12" or mre in depth shall be not exceeding 8 feet, unless both edges are supported laterally by bridging at intervals held in line. Section 2506(h), 2517. Show blocking at end and at supports of floor joists, and for rafters at exterior walls. Section 2517 (d) 3. Show solid blocking at ridge line' and at exterior walls on trussed roofs. Section 2506 (h), Section 2517 (h). ZIlrrlYU 14 Bearing partitions, perpendicular to joists, shall not be offset from supporting girders, beams, walls or partitions, more than the depth of the joists. Section 2517 (d) 5. ;J: ;il 9 0 . Show rafter ties. Rafter ties shall be spaced not more than 4 feet on center and be just above the ceiling joists, where rafters and ceiling joists are not parallel. Section 2517 (h) . Show rafter purlin braces to be not less than 45 degrees to the horizontal. Section 2517(h)5. . Show 112" minimum clearance between top plate of interior partitions and bottom chord of trusses. designed). (To ensure loading will be as 246 Show or note fire stops at the following locations per Section 2516 (f): a. in concealed spaces of stud walls and partitions, including furred spaces, at the ceiling and ' flwr levels and at 10 foot intervals along the length of the wall. b. at all interconnections between concealed vertical and horizontal spaces such as occur at soffits, drop ceilings and cove ceilings; c. in concealed spaces between stair stringers at the top and bottom of the run and between studs along and in line with the run of stairs if the walls under the stairs are unfinished; and A d. in openings around vents, pipes, ducts, which afford a passage for fire at ceiling chimneys, fireplaces and similar openings and floor levels, with noncombustible materials. 247. In buildings having floors and roofs of wood frame construction, other than dwelling or hotel occuoancies. draft stou the area between ll the ceil&e and floor above so that no concealed space exceeds 1,000 s.f. and no horizontal dimension exceeds 60 L.F. (if space has sprinklers then 3,000 s.f. and 100 L.F.). Section 2516(fj. II the ceil&e and floor above so that no concealed space exceeds 1,000 s.f. and no horizontal dimension exceeds 60 L.F. (if space has sprinklers then 3,000 s.f. and 100 L.F.). Section 2516(fj. W B 248 In buildings having floors and roofs of wood frame construction, other than dwelling or hotel occupancies, draft stop the area between the ceiline and roof above so that no concealed space exceeds 3,000 s.f. and no horizontal dimension exceeds 60 L.F. (if space has sprinklers, then 9,000 s.f. and 100 L.F.). Section 2516(f). 9. Show double top plate with minimum 48" lap splice. Section 2517 (g) 2. f 25-9. 0. Show nailing will be in compliance with Table Show stud size and spacing. Haximum allowable stud heights; bearing wall: 2 x 4 and 2 x 6 max. 10'; non-bearing: 2 x 4 max. 14', 2 x 6 max. 20'. Table 25-R-3. 2,d. Studs supporting two floors, a roof and ceiling must be 3 x 4 or 2 x 6 at 16" O.C. Table 25-R-3. Note an A.I.T.C. Certificate of Compliance for glued laminated wood members shall be given to the building inspector prior to installation. Section 2505. p. Detail all post to beam and post to footing plan. Section 2516 (m). connections and reference the detail to the Detail shear transfer connections, including roof and floor diaphragms, to shear walls. Section 2513. . Specify nail size and spacing for all shear walls, floor and roof diaphragms. Indicate required blocking. Maintain maximum diaphragm dimension ratios. (Tables 25 I, J, K) and Section 4714 (d). for this project. Specify on the plans the . Provide truss details and truss calculations tmss identification numbers. 3" plan. Section 302 (d). . Provide roof framing plan and floor framing y. Provide framing sections through Section 302 (d). wide. Section 2517 (9) 5. 0 Specify all header sizes for opening over 4' f horizontal framing members and post footings. 1. Provide calculations for main vertical and Section 302 (d). Provide calculations for lateral loads, shear panels, shear transfer and related. Section ' 302 (a) 7. In Seismic Zones 3 and 4, the allowable shear values for drywall in Table 47-1 must be not apply to wind loading. reduced 50% for earthquake loading. This does Show on the plans all structural requirements Columns and posts located on concrete or developed in the structural calculations. masonry floors or decks exposed to the weather or to water splash or in basements and which support permanent structures shall be supported by concrete piers or metal pedestals projecting above floors unless approved wood of natural resistance to decay or treat wood is used. Section 2516 (c) 4. J 66. Individual concrete or masonry piers shall project at least 8 inches above exposed ground unless the columns or posts which they support are of approved wood- of natural resistance to decay or treated wood is used. Section 2516 (c) 4- Specify plywood grade and panel identification index. Table 25-S-1. '* as a beam. Section 2517 (h). 8 When roof pitch is less than 3:12, design ridge 2d. If foundation cripple wall studs are less than 14", framing shall be solid blocking or the cripple studs sheathed with plywood. Section Cripple wall studs exceeding 4 feet in height shall be 3 inch by 4 inch or 2 inches by 6 inches when supporting 2 stories. Section 2517 (g) 4. Show plywood sheathing over exposed eaves, or other weather exposed areas, is "bonded with exterior glue." Plywood used for exterior wall covering shall be the exterior type. Section 2~. 2516 (g)3, 2516(i). Ridges, hips, and valleys shall be at least one size larger than supported rafters. Section 2517 (h) 3. across the b- at the ridge support. Section In open beam construction, provide strap ties 2501 (b). v. " Parking garages shall have an unobstructed headroom clearance of not less than 7"O" above the finish floor to any ceiling, beam, pipe or similar construction. Section 702 (b). Provide details of restrooms to show compliance with Section 510 (b), regarding floors, walls and showers. F If both sexes will be employed and the number of employees exceeds four, provide separate toilet facilities for men and women. If "both sexes will be employed and the total number of employees will not exceed four", and only one restroom is provided, note the words in quotation above on the floor plan. Section 705 Show unenclosed floor and roof openings, open and glazed sides of landings and ramps, balconies or porches more than 30" above grade or floor, and roofs used for other than height guardrail, through which a 6" sphere service to the building have 42" minimum Cannot pass, and designed for 20 lbs. per lin. ft. applied horizontally at top rail (50 lbs. for exit facilities serving more than 50). Section 1711. Table 23-B. plafform and stage construction, lncluding occupancy separations and roof vents, as per Chapter 39. Provide at least one drinking fountain for each floor level in Group A occupancies. Section 605. . Show that aisles and seats comply with ,@ Sections 3315 and 3316. Buildings housing Group A Occupancies shall front directly upon or have access to a public street not less than 20 feet in width. The access to the public street shall be a minimum 20-foot-wide right-of-way, unobstructed and maintained only as access to the public street. Ihe main entrance to the building access way. Section 603. shall be located on a public street or on the #. ;;;ytrian walkway shall comply with Section provided. (WC Table 23-P) is br" --whss-semx"tn" indl"--------- d e .. . .. fastened to the main runner shall be extended to and fastened to the structural members of the roof or floor above. These horizontal restraint points shall be placed 12 feet O.C. in both directions with the first point within wires to the structure above shall be adequate 6 feet of each wall. Attachment of restraint for the load imposed. UBC Standard 47-18. u. pag 24 EAnDIrn Alxws Provide note and details on the plans to show Access Check List. Handicapped access compliance with the enclosed Handicapped WC . requirements may be more restrictive than the X. $0 +. +- Provide mechanical plans, plan details, calculations and completed forms to show compliance with state regulations for energy conservation. Provide electrical plans, plan details, calculations and the completed Form 5 or CF-5 to show compliance with state regulations for energy conservation. Incorporate in we plans or specifications the attached "Title 24 Mandatory Requirements" and the "Title 24 Construction Compliance Statvent Requirements". 6 0 0 288 Please see additional corrections, or remarks, on the following page. 289 To speed up the recheck process, note on this been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or list (or a copy) where each correction item has detail number, calculation page, etc. 290. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describle them and where they are located in the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please check. Yes - No m: Ihe following provisions are contained in Title 24, Part 2, California Building Code, as adopted and enforced by the State Fire Marshall. They are provided here as a courtesy to assist designers in developing the project documents. All applicable provisions may not necessarily be included. Please direct any questions regarding interpretations of these provisions to the local Fire Department. Walls of corridors and exterior exit balconies in Groups A,E,I,R-1 and C Occupancies having an all other occupancies having an occupant load occupant load of more than e persons and in of 30 or more shall be not less than one-hour fire-resistive construction. Section 3305(g)1. 0 S-2 Where exit signs are required by Section 3314(a), approved and listed internally, externally or self-illuminated low-level exit signs complying with Section 3314 shall be required. The bottom of the sign shall be not above the floor level. For exit way doors, less than 6 inches nor more than 8 inches the sign shall be on the door with the closest edge of the sign with 4 inches of the door frame or adjacent to the door. Such signs . shall be of a type which is perceptible to the sense of touch. Section 3314(e). 0 f S-3. Where exit signs are required by Section 3314(a), all exit corridors shall be provided with continuous low-level exit path marking. Approved and listed internally or self- illuminated marking shall be installed at floor level or no higher than 8 inches above the floor level. Such marking shall be of a type which is perceptible to the sense of touch. Section 3314(f). Area separation walls shall not be considered to create separate buildings for the purpose of automatic fire-sprinkler system requirements as set forth in Chapter 38. EfCEPrICN: Buildings separated by continuous Section 505(e)6. area separation walls of four-hour fire- resistive construction without openings. Buildings required to have automatic fire- sprinkler protection as set forth in Section 13113 of the Health and Safety Code (homes for using area separation walls in lieu of children or the aged) are prohibited from automatic fire-sprinkler protection. In educational occupancies, storage and resistive construction with openings protected by assemblies having at least a three-fourths- hour fire-resistive rating. Section 802(c). J./ janitor closets shall be of one-hour fire- / / 0 -6. Section 1807 should he reviewed for all high- rise buildings. -7. Ihe exception in Section 3318 of the UBC has been revised so as to allow the omission of panic hardware at the main exit in churches (by using signage), only when the occupant load of the church is less than 300. s-a. If emergency warning systems are required, they shall activate a means of warning the hearing impaired. Flashing vimal warnings shall have a frequency of not more than 60 flashes per minute. Section 7204. The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 6191560-1468, to perform the plan check for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan check items, please contact P t='ISC at Esgil Corporation. Ihanlc you. Enclosures: 1. 2. 3. 3/28/90 18 TITLE 24 HANDICAPPED ACCESS CORRECTION LIST Jurisdiction c AUs L3Ao Plan Check No. SO- ?ZG .- References to section numbers with prefix "2" are to Title 24, California Code of Regulations, part 2 (California Building Code). Prefix "3" is for Part 3 (California Electrical code). prefix "5" is for Part 5 (California Plumbing Code). Exemptions claimed for any item shall be requested in writing and shall include all data needed to determine "weasomble hardship" as described in Section 2-422. SITE DWELOPMENT @ HANDICAPPED PARKING SPACES / Provide handkapped spaces. 2-7102(b) handicapped persons are not compelled to Space shall be so located that wheel or walk behind parked cars other than hislher own. 2-7102(c) 4 Parking space shall be a minimum of 9 ft.xl8 ft. with adjacent marked 5 ft. loading zone. Double space shall be 23 ft. wide. Where a single space is provided, the loadinglunloading zone vehicle. 2-7102(c). shall be on the passeneer side of the slope of parking surface in any direction shall not exceed 114" per foot. 2-7102(e). Parking space(s) shall be identified 'with the International Symbol of Accessibility on reflectorized sign affixed to post or wall, and also be 36"x36" and painted at the back of duplicated on parking surface (symbol to the parking stall). 2-7102(f) L 0 f. Entrance to parking area (or at each stall) shall have a si stating that unauthorized vehicle(s$ park+g in handicapped space(s) may be SubJect to tow-away. 2-7102(f) . , / Entrance to and vertical .clearance within accessible level of parking structure shall be 8 ft. 2 in. to MY structural member, duct or pipe. 2-7102(g) -. @"S a. Curb ramps shall be located wherever pedestrian path crosses curb. 7103(a)) (2- b. Curb ramp shall be 48" min. width (2- 7103(b)) with maximum slope of 1 in 12. 2-710314) C. A level 48" min. depth landing is required at top of curb ramps over entire curb ramp width. 2-7103(d) d. If no landing is provided, the slope of flared sides shall not exceed 1 in 12. 2-7103(d) e. Surface is to be slip resistant and a contrasting finish from adjacent sidewalk. 2-7103(f) f. Border -kings shall be 12" wide of 1/4"x1/4" grooves, 314" apart, located at top and sides. 2-7103(h) WAl a. t. <.. <. 6. i. 1. XS Site development and grading shall be designed to provide access to primary entrances and access to normal paths of travel and where necessary to provide access shall incorporate pedestrian ramps, curb ramps, etc. 2-7101(a) Walks slooine ereater than 5% (1 in 20) must comply- kth ramp requiGements oi Sec. 2-3307. 2-3325(c) Walk width shall be 48" minimum, and shall have slip-resistant surfaces. 2-3325(a) The maximum cross slope shall not exceed lllr" per foot. 2-3325(a)3 Gratings are not allowed whenever possible. '2-3325(b) At each gate or door a 60"x60" level area the walk. 2-3325(e) is required when the gate swings toward A 48"xU" deep level area is required when the gate swings away from the walk. 2-3325(e) A 24" clear space is required at strike side of gate or door. 2-3325(e) ,,/ PEDESTRIAN WS A path of travel with a slope greater than 1 in 20 shall be considered a ramp. 2-3307(a) . lhe maximum slope shall be 1 in 12. 2-3307(c.1) k. The width shall be 48" minimum. A ! minimum width of 60" is required where a ramp serves as a primary entrance to buildings having an occupant load of 300 or more. Group R Occupancies may be 36" when the occupant load is 50 or less. 2- 3307(b.l) . The surface of ramps shall be slip- resistant. 2-3307(g) . A 60" intermediate landing is required at maximum elevation change of 30" and 72" landing at each change of direction (over 30 degrees). 2-3307(d.1) f. landings are required at top and bottom of ramps. 2-3307(d.1) z. Bottom landing shall be min- of 72'' 1lA in the direction of travel. Fig. 2-33- f . Top landing shall be 60" x 60" minimum. 2-3307(d.l) .. . When ' door swings onto top landing, minimum depth of landing required is door width plus 42". 2-3307(d.1.) . Top landing shall have 60" min. width when door swings onto the landing, with 24" on strike side of door at exterior ramp, or 18" at interior ramp. 2-3307(d.l) . Ramp handrails are required on each side of ramp, when slope exceeds 1 in 15. 2- 3307(e.1) . Ramp handrails shall be continuous, located 30"-34" in height above ramp surface, with 12" extensions beyond top and bottom, and the ends returned. 2-3307(e.l) t . Handrails shall be 1-1/4" to 2" cross wall. 2-3307(e.l) section, spaced minimum of 1-1/2" from . A 2" high curb or wheel guide rail centered 3" 2 1" above ramp surface is required on both sides where not otherwise bounded by walls when the ramp exceeds 10 feet in length. 2-3307(h.1) f SPECIAL ACCESS LIFTS Lifts may be provided between levels! in lieu of elevator, when the vertical distance between landings, structural elevator, structural design and safeguards are as allowed by the State of California, Department of Industrial Relations, Division of Occupational Safety and Health. 2-5107(a) . The lift platform shall be of sufficient size to accomodate a wheelchair (30"x48"). 2-5107(a) 4 area or landing (60"x60") at each level . There shall be a level and clear floor for access to the lift. 2-5107(a) ' surface to any overhanging obstruction. . Provide 80" headroom from wallway 2-3326(b) - Headroom of 80li minimum shall be maintained for walks, corridors, aisles, etc. 2-522(f) Protruding objects with leading edges between 27" and 80" above finished floor shall not protrude more than 4" into walks, corridors, etc. 2-522(f) . /. Free standing objects mounted on posts between 27" and 80" above the floor may project a maximum of 12". 2-522(f) . Abrupt changes in level exceeding 4" adjacent to walks, except between walks and adjacent streets or drives, shall be identified by 6" high warning curbs above walk surface. 2-3326(a) ~AIUJ~m 0 ENTRANCES, DOORS, VESTIBULES AND CORRIDORS a All primary entrances to buildings shall be accessible to the handicapped. 2-3301(f) SYLh, LC hX7EiERror a-3 4j7-.zz Auk551 bLt (LAumrLS, CLX$ L") 7 clear opening at 90 degrees (36" door). . All required passage doors shall have 32" 2-3304(f) At least one of a pair of doors shall meet the minimum 32" clear entrance width requirement. 2-3304(f) Threshold shall be no higher than 112" above the floor. Edge to be beveled with a slope no greater than 1 in 2, if more - than 114". 3304(i.1) Exterior level landing may slope up to 1/11'' per . foot in any direction for surface drainage. 2-413 Door hardware shall be of the lever or push type, mounted 30" to U" above the floor and be operable with a maximum effort of 8.5 lbs. for exterior doors and 5 lbs. for interior doors. 2-3304(c), 2- 3304(i.2) The lower 10" of the door shall be of except at automatic and sliding doors. smooth, plane surface (no recess or trap) 2-3304(i.3) Building entrmce(s) shall be identified by sign with the International Symbol of Tne symbol shall be a white figure on Accessibility. Show location on plan. blue background. 2-522(b) At turnstile, provide an access gate, 32" clear width opening, within 30 feet of turnstile. 2-3304(i.4) There shall be a clear area on each side of door, 60" deep in direction of door swing and 44" deep in opposite direction of door swing. 2-3304(i.l) J J Width of clear area on the swing side of the door shall extend 24" past strike jamb for exterior doors and 18" past strike jamb for interior doors. 2-3304(i.l) WbJY dOWzS 30 ~~07 CWLY The space between two consecutive doors (vestibule) shall provide a minimum of 48" clear depth between the open door and a second closed door.Doors in a series at a vestibule shall swing in the between them. 2-3304(i.l) same direction, or away from the space ' special requirements of Sec. 2-3305(b)2. For corridors over 200 feet long, see / Floors of a given story shall be a comon level throughout or shall be connected by pedestrian ramps, passenger elevators, or s pecial access lifts. ' 2-522(e) 8 STAIRWAYS m: Only applies here. disabled access is provided or requked to otbar levels. a. Treads shall have smooth, rounded exposed edges and be slip resistant. 2- 3306(s) b. Nosing shall not project more than 1-112 inches past face of the riser below. 2-3306(s) c. Risers shall be sufficiently solid. 2-3306(s) d. The upper approach and lower tread of each flight of stairs shall be marked with a contrasting colored strip 2" in width. 2-3306(r) e. On exterior stairs, & tread shall be marked as noted above. 2-3306(r) f. Handrails are required on side of staiway. 2-3306 g. Handrails shall be located 30" to 34" above nosing,extend 12" beyond top riser and 12" plus tread width beyond bottom nosing and returned to walllnewel post. 2-3306(j.l). So as not to conflict with the UBC, handrails should be shown at a height of 34". h. Handrails shail be 1-114" to 2" in gripping cross section and 1-112'' clear of wall. 2-3306(j.l) J Approved stairway - identification signs shall be located at each floor level in all enclosed stairways in buildings two or more stories in height. The sign shall identify the staiway, indicate whether there is roof access, the floor level, and the upper and lower terminus be presented using raised Arabic numerals of the stairway. The information shall and raised braille symbols which conform to Section 522(b)3. The sign shall be located approximately 5 feet above the floor landing immediately adjacent to the door on the strike side. Signs shall comply with requirements of U.B.C. Standard No. 33-2. 0 10. ELEVATORS a. Provide clear inside elevator car dimensions as required by U.B.C. Section 5103(d) 6 and Title 24 2-5103(d.l). 1. At least one elevator in buildings 4 or more stories in height: 80" by 54", with a 42-inch side slide door. Applies only to: high-rise buildings, AIEII occupancies, State-owned buildings, residential care homes, hotels, motels, apartments and condominiums. 2. Elevator in buildings more than two stories or buildings where disabled access is required to upper level(s): width of 36". 68" by 54", with a minimum clear door c 3. Elevators other than in (b) above serving less than 50 occupants shall have a minimum inside platform of 4 minima clear door width of 36 inches. feet 6 inches by 4 feet 6 inches and a b. Raised Braille markings and Arabic numerals are required on control buttons and door jambs. 2-5103(d.1) "IIAE FA- @TOILET FACILITIES ACCESS a. When located on accessible floors, accessible to physically handicapped. sanitary facilities shall be made (2-511.1(a)) Doorways shall have 32" minimum clear ,L! mere shall be a level area with 60" clear depth in the direction of the door swing, and a level area with U" clear depth in opposite direction of door swim. 2-511.Ua) /d opening width. 2-511.1 - @ MULTIPLE ACCOWODATION TOILET FACILITIES .. - a. Provide clear area 60" diameter x 27" high - or clear s ace 56" x 63" x 27" high. 2-511.l(ap b. Doors (other than handicap compartment) are not to encroach more than 12" into above mentioned clear space. 2-511.l(a) ~ ~~ C. Provide a 28" clear space between water closet and fixture or 32" clear space between water closet and wall. 2-511.l(a) d. A 48" long clear space is required in front of water closet. A 60'' cle~t . . . - - - - space is required when the toilet compartment has a side door. 2-511.l(a) e. Water closet compartment door to provide 32" clear width for end entry and 34" clear width for side entry. Door to be self-closing. 2-511.l(a) (%) SINGLE ACCOMHODATION ToIm FACILITIES v a. Water closet shall be located 28" from a fixture or 32" from a wall. 2-511.l(a) b. Minimum clear space in front of water closet shall be 48". 2-511.l(a) c. In an existing building, a single accomodation toilet facility may have a space 36" wide x 48 " long in fron: of water closet. 2-511.l(a) 0 14 GRAB BARS AT WATER cu)SEc a. Dne at side 42" long extending 24" in front of water closet; one at rear 36" long centered on water closet; both mounted 33" above floor. Where a tank- high as 36". 2-511.l(a) type toilet is used, grab bar may be as b. Bars shall be 1-1/4" to 1-112'' in diameter with 1-112" clearance to wall. 2-511.l(a) C. Bar fasteners and mounting support shall be able to withstkhd 250 lbs./ft. in bending, shear end tension. 2-511.l(a) A WATER CLOSET W a. Height of water closet seat shall be 17" to 19" above floor. -5-1502 b. Controls shall be operable with one hand, and shall not require tight wrlst. 5-1502 prying, pinching or twisting of the c. Controls for the flush valves shall be mounted on the wide side of toilet areas, no more than 44" above the floor. 5-1502 d. Ihe force required to activate controls shall be no greater than 5 pounds force. 5-1502 @URINALS " a. Where urinals are provided, the rim of at and be located 17" maximum above floor. least one shall project 14" from the wall 5-1503(a) b. The force required to activate the flush valve shall be 5 lbs. maximum and located 44" maximum above floor. 5-1503(b) c. Provide 30" x &E'' clear floor space for forward approach. 2-511.l(b) @ LAVATOUES a. Provide 30" x 48" clear floor space for forward apmoach. Said clear floor soace may inclvde knee and toe space &der lavatory described below. 2-511.11b) b. Provide clear space beneath lavatories and 9" high by 30" wide by 17" deep at 29" high by 30" wide by 8" deep at top bottom from front of lavatory (toe " height should be 34". 5-1504(a) space). The maximum counter surface c. Hot water and drain pipes under lavatories shall be insulated. 5-1504(b) d. Faucet controls and operating mechanism type not requiring tight grasping, (operable with one hand) shall be of the plnching or twisting of the wrist (such as lever-operated) and an operating force not exceeding 5 lbs. 5-1504(c) c e. If self-closine .valves are used. thev I shall remain open for at i-t 10 seconds. 5-1504(c) , ~~~~< h? ToILFT ROOM ACCESSORIES a. Mirror bottom edge shall be located 40" maximum above floor. 2-511.l(b) b. Toilet tissue disDensers shall be mounted within 12" from the front edge of toilet seat. 2-511.l(b) C. Operating parts of dispensing and disposal fixtures (towels, waste, coin slots, etc.) shall be within 40" of floor. 2-511.l(b) SANIURY FACILITIES IDENTIFICATION a. On doorways leading to sanitary facilities the symbols to be provided are 12" Equilateral triangle for men, 12" diameter circle for women, and 114" thick, centered on door, 60" high and contrasting color. Unisex facilities shall be identified by the circle with the triangle superimposed within the circle. 2-511.l(a) ~W~ING FACILITIES W a. One such facility shall comply when provided for the public, clients or employees. 2-511.l(a) b. Shower compartment shall be 42" wide, 48" deep, with a 36" wide entrance. 2-511.l(a) c. Show on the plans that the handicapped bathing facilities shall conform to requirements of Sec. 2-511a-9, 5-1505 and 5-1506, i.e., folding seat, flexible shower hose, etc. .. ..>. ' ,/ DRINKING 'k0UNTAIN a. Drinking fountains shall be within alcoves. Ihe alcove shall be not less than 32" wide by 18" deep. 2-511.l(c) b. When the enforcing agency determines hardship to locate the water fountain in that it would create an unreasonable project into the path of travel, and the an alcove, the water fountain may path of travel shall be identifiable to the blind as follows: (1.) Ihe surface of the path of travel at the water fountain shall be textured blind person using a cane. The minb so that it is clearly identifiable by a textured area shall extend from the wall supporting the water fountain to 1 foot beyond the front edge of the water fountain and shall extend 1 foot beyond each side of the water fountain, or each side of the water fountain. The (2.) Wing walls shall be provided on wing walls shall project out from the water fountain to within 6 inches of the supporting wall at least as far as the surface of the path of travel. Also, there shall be a. minimum of 32 inches clear between the wing walls. c. Note on the plans that drinking fountain shall conform to requirements of Sec. 2-511~ and 5-1507. a. Provide space 30" x 48" for forward or parallel approach to' telephone. 2-511.l(d) b. Note on the ~lans that Dublic teleohone shall confori to requi;ements of Sec. 2-511.1(6). a. 15, 20 and 30 amp receptacle outlets shall be installed not less than 12" above floor. 3-210-50(e) b. Canter of switches shall be located not less than 36" nor more than 48" above the floor. 3-380-8(c) @ PLUMBING REQUIkS .. - a. Where kitchenettes are provided at employee break rooms, conference areas, customer lounges, etc., the faucet controls at kitchen sinks shall be operable with one hand and shall not require tight grasping, pinching or twisting of the wrist (i.e., use lever- operated, push-type, etc.). If self- closing valves are used, they shall remain open for at least 10 seconds. 5-1508 maIP A OanPAnCY mqunmmm ASSR4BLY HAILS, THWTRES, ETC. . Seating and toilet facilities for the handicapped shall be accessible from the main lobby or primary entrance. 2-6ll(b) . This structure requires wheelchair seating spaces. In theaters and auditoriums. the seatim shall be provided in a vkiety of locatzons so as to provided a choice of admission prices. 2-6ll(b) I:. Each wheelchair space shall be 60" x 30" and level. 2-611(b) c. When the seating capacity exceeds 300, the wheelchair spaces shall be in more than one location. 2-611(b) e. This structure requires L seats for semi-ambulant persons. Clear 2-611(b) leg space shall be at least 24". f. Stages, enclosed plabforms, orchestra pits, ticket booths, and unenclosed and refreshment sales facilities shall be made accessible. 2-611(b) NMS . lhis stnuture requires wheelchair seating spaces. In theaters and auditoriums, the seating shall be provided in a variety of locations so as to provided a choice of admission prices. . When the seating capacity exceeds 300, the wheelchair spaces shall be in more than one location. 2-611(c) . Ticket booths must be accessible from both sides. 2-611(c) . Participation ara such as ball courts, exercise rooms, tracks, and clubrooms must be accessible. 2-611(c) requirements of Chapter 2-5. locker facilities must conform to the ~cALmuraoRRBcnorr~ - . JURIsI1moFI: CARLSWD MIE: 4-34 -40 PAGE " 1/2 . PIUlalKm~: 40-566 SFT ~VOLUX WAGGKmm ppAmLLllDRRIsoFl ~~~OYWDILLOW *To speed up the recheck process,note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, specification, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. - Submit complete electrical plans and specifications. Submit plan showing location of all services. Submit complete one-line diagram of service and feeders. Indicate the grounding system to be installed for building service. Indicate ampere interrupting capacities equipment. NEC 230-651110-9. (AIC) of service and subservice 0 U. Provide overcurrent protection on the secondary side of transformers. NEC 240- 21/384-16(d). @Submit plan showing location of all 8 CDMPLE7-S panels. SEE /4jQ 15. Submit panel schedules. 16- Specify conduit and wire sizes. 0 17. Specify alumiriwn or copper conductors and type of insulation. Show approximate length of feeders. Indicate sizes of fuses andlor circuit breakers. 0 wire. (aluminum or copper) 19. Specify electrode conductor size and type Indicate fuse symbols to show fault currents are limited to 10,000 amps on branch circuits, i.e. JJN, LCL. 2?f Indicate existing main service size. J If fuses are not used to limit fault Indicate existing main service load. currents on branch circuits to 10,000 amps, specify method to be used. 24. Indicate new additional loads. Submit plan showing location of all switchboards. load calculations. 1uuDE , NEC 220- loCb> 216-Z SEE 714 #Indicate wiring method, i.e. W, metal flex. @ Indicate dimension of switchboards and more. NEC 110-16(c). control panels rated 1200 amperes or a Submit plan showing location of all - transformers. - SEE /iA installed for transformers. NEC 250- 12. Indicate the grounding system to be 0 25. Show exit signs on the electrical 3314 of the 1988 UBC> provide two sources lighting plan(s). As per Sec. 3313 and of power to exit signs and exit illumination. within.25' of the WAC AIC units. UHC Section 509. Provide mltiple switch lighting controls ' per Mc, Title 24, 2-5319. mcHwk THF FI W-T. ?LAUS FOR EWPS &hlD INCO-V~ WW!?.F Any questions on electrical please contact the plan checker shown above, at Esgil Corporation at (619) 560-1468. lhank you. I I I .j . ./ ELECTRICAL NEWSLETTER 450-9 TRANSFORMER VENTILATION DEC 81 - APR 85 Closets and rooms housing transformers shall have provisions to maintain an ambient temperature which does not exteed the ambient temperature rating on the transformer. This may be accomplished by natural or mechanical ventilation, by mechanical cooling, or by other means. 1. Natural ventilation which complies with the provisions of Section 450-45 shall be acceptable. 2. Mechanical ventilation which provides for air movement of 3 cubic feet per I minute/per KVA of transformer rating shall be acceptable.. 3. Nechmical cooling which can be demonstrated to maintain an ambient temperature below that of the transformer rating shall be acceptable. 4. Any other means, including combinations of the above methods, which can be demonstrated to maintain an ambient temperature below that of the transformer rating shall be acceptable. .. Any ventilation openings from the room into the interior of the building shsll be protected by a damper having a fire rating of not less than one hour. CODE REFERENCE SUBJECT PUBLISHED 450-21( b) TRANSFORMERS OVER 112-1/2 KVA - - APR 85 For the purposes of this subsection, a "transformer room of fire resistant construction' shall mean a room enclosed by not less than one hour rated walls and floor/ceiling assemblies, with metal or solid wood, non-rated doors with self-closing devices. ! UNIF~RM BUILDING CODE Exit lllumlnatlo~ and sleeping rooms, exits shall bc illuminated at any time the building is occupied Sce. 3313. (a) General. Excepl within individual dwelling units, guest rooms with light having intensity of not less than 1 footcandle at floor level. EXCEF'TIOH: In auditoriums, healen, ioncen or open halls md similar u- xmbly uses. he illumination at flwr level may bc reduced during prformancer IO not leu than 0.2 foolcandle. Futures required for exit illumination shall be supplied from separate sources of power where required by Subsection (b). normally bc provided by the premises' wiring system. In the event of its failure. @l Se~arnlc sources of Dower. The power supply for exit illumination shall illumination shall be automatically provided from an emergency system for Group 1. Division 1 Occupancies and for all other occupancies where the exiting system scn'es an occupant load of 100 or more. For high-rise buildings. see Section 1807. For smokeproof enclosures, pee Section 3310 (9) 9. Emergency systems shall be supplied from storage batteries or an on-site generatorset and the systemshallbe installed in accordance with the requirements of the Elecuical Code. I Exlt Slqns . .. See. 3314. (a) Where Required. Exit signs shall be installed at required exit dooways and where otherwise necessary to clearly indicate the direction of EXCEFTION: Mainextcriorexitdwm w,hich obviously andclcarly M idcnti- @) Graphics. ?he color and design of lettering..arrows and other symbols on exit signs shall be in high convast with their background. Words on the sign shall be in block letterr 6 inches in height with a stroke of not less than 3/4 inch. i egress when the exit ierves an DCCUD~~~ load of 50 or more,' liable as exiu need not be signed when approved by the building official. elechic I~~Ps or shall be of an aDDroved self-luminous type. When the luminance (c) Bumlnation. Signs shall be internally or externally illuminated bv two on the face of an exit sign is from an external source. it shall have an intcnsitv of not less than 5.0 footcandles from either lamp. Intemally illuminated signs &all provide equivalent luminance. . .. . .. ELECTRICAL NEWSLETTER CODE REFERENCE SUBJECT PUBLISHED 230-95 GROUND FAULT PERFORMANCE TESTING FEB 89 Section 230-95 requires that certain services be provided with a ground fault protection system. Subsection (c) requires that tests be performed on such systems, presumably to assure that the equipment performs its intended function. This code section does not define who is to perform these tests or what information is to be included in the written report for inspection jurisdictions. Additionally, the requirement that these tests be performed on the system "when first installed on site" allows tests to be made at inappropriate times. The following standards for performance testing are established to assure that acceptable manner. performance testing of ground fault systems is accomplished in a uniform and 1. Performance testing shall be performed by a third party capable of demonstratjng both the knowledge and equipment necessary for such tests. 2. The required tests shall be conducted after all electrical work has been performed and before the building is occupied. 3. The written record of the test shall include: a) A copy of the manufacturers instructions for performance testing of the equipment. b) A statement that the service grounding connections are correctly installed for a ground fault system. c) A statement that all neutral conductors in the distribution system have been tested and found to be ungrounded. Describe the test method used.. d) A statement that the ground fault equipment functioned properly when tested. Include the actual settings and trip-times of the tests. Dater E;, Jurisdiction wcs GAG .Prepas I PF VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE .- 0 Bldg. Dept. Esgil PLAN CHECK NO, YO- S-66 BUILDING ADDRESS lSI'L 4SibN AyL APPLICANT/CONTACT PHONE NO. BUILDING OCCUPANCY et DESIGNER PHONE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION YrJ SfK CONTRACTOR PHONE - Building Permit Fee. S $5-/ Plan Check Fee f S 365; ?8 '.. 4, 5"" Jurisdiction CLkcCS GAD .. - Q Bldg. Dept. VALUATTON AND PLAN CHECK FZE c] Esgil ip 9% x: %. ., PLAN CHECK NO. 70- SL6 ! . .. BUILDING ADDRESS 1812 RSi3rJ AVL AFDLICANT/CONTACT PHONE NO. sUILDDING OCCUPANCY Kz- DESIGNER PHONE TYPS OF' CONSTRUCTION. Tr.J SPn. CONTRACTOR PHONE Building Permit fee 5 Plan Check fee $ 5 3653. 5621 s3 ' $3 COHHENTS: ESGIL CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR.. SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) 560-1468 i DATE : TIP<- \2 - 40 JURISDICTION: c ts 6% cAv\Sk&A, PLAN CHECK NO: cb 417 - 55~ofukM/) SET: (r ) PROJECT ADDRESS: \%\X QsT;Sh &A. Y "FILE COPY i; r" UPS i -1 !".DESIGNER -.J PROJECT NAME: CabYk ((-&\I . C\ub M-4. J- ~QC,\&?& The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply m with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficien- 0 necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's cies identified herd checked by building department staff. are resolved and The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the 0 identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected ' The plans are being held at Esgil Corp. until corrected a jurisdiction to return to the applicant contact person. 0 The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil staff did not plan check has been advise the completed. applicant contact person that cz been completed. Person contacted: I Esgil staff did advise applicant that the plan check has Date contacted: Telephone # REMARKS: ?\Chs oeld7-e kr ~~$~er\ . ENGINEERING CHECKLIST BUILDING PLANCHECK 4 2 v;' OAT E : 4/6/90 ITEM COMPLETE !.* z& PLANCHECK NO. %- 566 0 ITEM INCOMPLETE - NEEDS YOUR ACTION 1 ?' 3 4322 ~s& &E SNR TDD C C C PROJECT ID:OfF/@ ~%6 - & &, &C. HHH ccc E E E LEGAL REOUIREMENTS LITEM SELECTED & a Site Plan 1. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: north arrow, property lines, easements, existing and pro osed structures, streets, existing street improvements,& -"and dimensioned setbacks. 2. Show on site plan: Finish floor elevations, pad elevations, elevations of finish grade adjacent to building, existing topographical lines, existing and proposed slopes, driveway with percent (%) grade and drainage patterns. 3. Provide legal description and Assessors Parcel Number. Discretionarv ADDrOVal ComDl iance % 4. No Discretionary approvals were required. 5. Project complies with all Engineering Conditions of Approval 6. Project does not comply with the following Engineering for Project No. Conditions of Approval for Project No. Field Review Conditions complied with by: Date: d,/p 7. Field review completed. No issues raised. with the site plan were found: 8. Field Review completed. The following issues or discrepancies A. Site lacks adequate public improvements. 6. Existing drainage improvements not shown or in conflict with site plan. C. Site is served by overhead power lines. 0. Grading is required to access site, create pad or provide for ultimate street improvement. FRM0010.DH c E. Site access visibility problems exist. Provide onsite turnaround- or engineered solution to problem. F. Other: DL-! 9. No dedication required. 5 10. Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer oKs.s. or Land Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description together with an a+" x 11" plat map and submit with a title report and the required processing fee. All easement documents must be approved and signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. The description of the dedication is as fol 1 ows : E&EmA/s ,w@ wme~u~s &V p-75. BUrJG Pm BY WATa dfm Dedication completed, Date: By : Imorovement Reauirements " 11. No public improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaaed or defective imorovements found adjacent to buildina site must be reoaired to the satisfaction of the Citv insDector orior to occuoancvt x '12. Public improvements required. This project requires construction of public improvements pursuant to Section 18.40 of the City Code. Please have a registered Civil Engineer prepare appropriate improvement plans and submit. for separate plancheck process through the Engineering Department. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of permit. The required improvements are: wazud~5 ,am ,-=e ~YLEWB. Improvement plans signed, Date:27 SPqp By: L.l-kl6s 13. Improvements are required. Construction of the public of the City Code. Please submit a letter requesting deferral improvements may be deferred in accordance with Section 18.40 of the required improvements together with a recent title report on the property and the appropriate processing fee so we may prepare the necessary Future Improvement Agreement. The Future Improvement Agreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Future Improvement Agreement completed, Date By : - " 13a. Inadequate information available on site plan to make a determination on grading requirements. Please provide more detailed proposed and existing elevations and contours. Include accurate estimates of the grading quantities (cut, fill, import, export). - 14. No grading required as determined by the information provided on the site plan. - % 15. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by ~~2#~6./7 a registered Civil Engineer must be submitted for separate plan check and approval through the Engineering Department. NOTE: The Gradinq Permit must be issued and aradinq substantiallv comolete and found acceDtable to the City Insoector orior to issuance of Buildina Permits. Grading Inspector sign off. Date:[? ETm By: f. Miscell aneous Permits - 16. Right-of-way Permit not required. A17. Right-of-way Permit required. A separate Right-of-way Permit issued by the Engineering Department is required for the following: DRIVFWN We5aCkt€J . c6nwEc~~~~ or wBTERL/& a wa~n;A lid SrM - 18. Sewer Permi t is not required. 219. Sewer Permit is required. A Sewer Permit is required concurrent with Building Permit issuance. The fee required is noted below in the fees section. - 20. Industrial Waste Permit is not required. FRM0010.DH 08/29/85 &1. Industrial Waste Permit is required. Applicant must complete Industrial Waste Permit Applicantion Form and submit for City approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. Permits must be issued prior to occupancy. Date:24Trr By: C.W. Industrial Waste Permit accepted - Fees Reaui red d22. Park-in-Lieu Fee Quadrant:- Fee per Unit: - L Total Fee: 123. ?Traffic Impact Fee Fee Per Unit: $15. Total Fee:JA;cI&, Fee per Unit. J22. Total Fee: \%%2. x24. %ridge and Thoroughfare Fee @5. Public Facilities Fee required. x26. @Faci'lJ ies Management Fee Zone: 5 Fee: 2!5;8k1 "27. @Sewer Fees Permit No.SECICK)I4f-) EDU's 90. I / qR-2 Fee:J% 137.5 * Fee: '%.&e > 28. Sewer Later 1 required: .4- 08/29/89 CITY Of CARLSBAD GRADING INSPECTION CHECKLISI FOR PARTIAL SITE RELEASE PROJECT INSPECTOR: -~p-&-N~ESq/ DATE: /O -/7- ?O PROJECT ID:/?E. 2. 90.17 CP~~AA'G~~F GRADING PERHI T NO. : 2.40.17 LOTS REQUESTED FOR RELEASE: 45?4/&&6 m0 - GemnrerrLr/ N/A = Not Applicable 0 = Incomplete or unacceptable / = Complete 1st. 2nd. 1. 2. 3. / / 5; / 4. / &I 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. N@ Site access to requested lota adequate and logically grouped Site erosion control meaautos adequate Overall site adequate for health, safety end welfare of public Letter of request for partial releaae submitted 8-1/2" X 11" site plsn showing requested lot3 submitted Engineer-of-work certification of work done and pad elevations Geologic engineer's letter if unusual geologic or subsurface conditione exist Project conditions of approval checked for co-icts Can water service be installed prior to bringing bujlding combustibles on site. p/nr &.g@W c~es0 P?ar/rCoq V s/Ta 111 for the purpose of building permit issuance. Issuance of building Partial releaae of grading for the ebove stated lots is approved permits is atill subject to all normal City requirements required pursuant to the building permit process. Partial release of the site is denied for the following reasons: /6+17- 70 &/A DATE PROJECT ENGINEER DATE - 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE CARLSBAD,CALlFORNlA92009.4859 office ol the City Engineer TO: DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING SERVICES FROM: ENGINEERING INSPECTION DIVISION DATE : /O - 2 2'-90 (619)43&1161 TELEPHONE We have inspected the grading for Lotp. 70 .ep-pkbn of the above mentioned project. In addition, we have received rough grading certification from deeso;e /NC . , the Soils Engineer, dated /O-/@ -90 , and from pwR&&$ ,&#Ok/d the Supervision Grading Engineer, dated /Q-/6-9 0 , and are satisfied that the rough grading has been completed in accordance with City Standards. Based on these certifications and our observation, we take no exception to the issuance of a building permit for Lou 70 od+rlme of project /?E. 2.q0.17 COORA GOLF from a grading standpoint. This release, however, is not intended to certify the project from other engineeriny concerns including site development, water or sewer availa- bility, or final grading. We will need to be advised prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy so that we can verify that final grading and landscaping has been completed in accordance with the approved plans for the project. APPROVED: L, /& / GSr. Construction Inspector PLANNING CHECKLIST dn0 Plan Check No. % ym Address &/ZA APN: g/2-/aTffi /I P1 anner rn/& kw?vl Phone 438-1161 ~fl c Type of Project and Use (Name) & 5&h/ Zone c Facilities Management Zone 5” IJ Item Complete @ Item Incomplete - Needs your action was identified 1, 2, 3 Number in circle indicates plancheck number that deficiency Environmental Review Required: YES - NO - TYPE DATE OF COMPLETION: Compl’iance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval Discretionary Action Required: YES - NO - TYPE APPROVAL/RESO. NO. DATE: OTHER RELATED CASES: PROJECT NO. . Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval Coastal : YES - NO - DATE OF APPROVAL: Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval co 0 00 0 on 0 'an 0 00 0 00 0 Landscape Plan Required: YES NO See attached submittal requirements for landscape plans Site Plan: 1. 2. 3. 4. Zoning: 1. 2. 3. 4. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed width and dimensioned setbacks. structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way Show on Site Plan: Finish floor elevations, elevations of finish grade adjacent to building, existing topographical lines, existing and proposed slopes and driveway. Provide legal description of property. Provide assessor's parcel number. A' Setbacks: Front: Requ i red Shown - Int. Side: Requ i red Shown - Street Side: Required Shown Rear: Required Shown - Lot coverage: Requ i red Shown .. Height: Required Shown - Parking: Spaces Required - Shown Guest Spaces Required - Shown Additional coments and remarks have been made on the building plans. These lurked-up plans may be picked up at the Building Department. These marked- up plans must be ksubnitted wlth the revised plans far this project. Have plans been marked up? YES NO - Additional Comnents March 7, 1991 Gene Chapo 535 N. Highway 101 - B Solana Beach, CA 92075 SUBJECT BUILDING PERMIT NO. CB 90-556 - 1812 ASTON AVENUE In discussions with the project superintendent and the Building Department inspector it has come to our attention that some roof and ground equipment is planned for the above referenced industrial building. The project site is located with the Carlsbad Research Center Specific Plan 180 which requires all exterior components to be completely screened from view within an area of 500 feet surrounding the building. While we have not seen any official submittals for this exterior equipment, we have been told that permit applications are emrninent. Please be aware that any proposal must be accompanied with a screening plan that meets the requirements of the Specific Plan. Feel free to call me at (~319) 438-1 161, ext. 4499 if you have any questions. -4 MICHAEL GRI Assistant Planw C: Doris Cosman Kathi Henderson Carter Darnell MQ Construction File Copy Chapo.Hr MG:km 2075 Las Palmas Drive - Carlsbad, California 92009-4859 - (619) 438-1161 2560 ORION WAY CARLSBAD,, CA 92008 TELEPHONE (619) 931-2121 d Citp of Carlsbab FlRE DEPARTMENT PLAN CHECK REPORT PAGE 1 OF 1 APPROVED DISAPPROVED tzl PLAN CHECK# PROJECT &JL?/?A /TO[ @- ADDRESS /8/z /%/ad - ARCHITECT c-31It OWNER 3 A( K w/r he t - - COMA RKK~DDRESS %wcm SAM 6 -PHONE 7%-//y/ OCCUPANCY CONST. &~ TOTALSQ. FT. L&.s3 STORIES - ~PD AYor - ADDRESS ?,x hP &r d PHONE 4 VI-7 11 4 b - YPRINKLERED TENANT IMP. APPROVAL OF PLANS IS PREDICATED ON CONFORMING TO THE~FoLLowl~NG C~oNol,TioNs~AND,oR ~MAKI~NO ~ ~ THE FOLLOWINQ CORRECTIONS PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND PERMITS - 1. Provide one copy of: floor plan@); slte plan; sheets - 2. Provide two site plans showing the location of all existing fire hydrants within 200 feet of the project. I 3. Provide specifications for the following: barn ZM ~~~wt;ur ?/w 64 St bhli7~(~~ COa, alarms, hydrants). Plan must be approved by the fire departmemnstallation. - 5. The business owner shall complete a building information letter and return it to the fire department. 4. Permits are requlred for the installation of all fire protection systems e stand pipes, dry chemical, halon, FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT - 6. The following fire protectlon systems are requir % Automatic fire sprinklers (Design Criteria: * &3*,m Dry Chemical, Halon, COI (Location: ) 0 Stand Pipes (Type: 1 O Flre Alarm (TypeILocation: ) ) 7. Flre Extlngulsher Requirements: $One 2A rated ABC ey!Lnpgi.sher for each sq. ft. or portion thereof with a travel distance to the nearest 0 An exilnguisher with a minlmum ratlng of to be located: extlngulsher not to exceedmet of travel. $ 8. Addltlonal fire hydrant($ shall be provlded,AS %7'r @l L/iC &/?w(U6 <. 0 Other: EXITS a 9. Exit doors shall be openable from the inside without the use of a key or any special knowledge or effort, XlO. A sign stating, " This door to remain unlocked during buslness hours" shall be placed above the main exitan& xll. EXIT signs (6" x %" letters) shall be placed over ail required exits and directional signs located as necessary to GENERAL %12. Storage; dlspensing or use of any flammable or combustible liquids, flammable liquids, flammable gases and hazardous chemicals shall comply with Unlform Fire Code. 313, Building(s) not approved for high piled combustible stock. Storage in closely packed piles ahall not exceed 15 feet in height, 12 feet on pallets or in racks and 6 feet for tires, plastics and some flammable ilquids. If high stock pil- ing is to be done, comply with Uniform Fire Code, Article 81. clearly indicate the location of exit doors. C LC LLA LW I h, #I&% ) 14. Additlonal Requirements. 1. L L) A j),~ <I .P//LL)C)M~ //v L ARM 'i S t fA- U Atz PSv, de- - - I+ I,U /PI f7A/4?~~e~ nU.r LO~C~TV,~, I suc;rtm I zl ?IZdL/l ,) F &A/ 07 AN,./ *Pn-rt, N Rkw, 5/ dd/J /&4&/RCd 31 ??7,,0,,3' - - eQt/ Of- 5&Zz €2. E3,Ef. n-?pZ ,, n/lf 3 42 .%LA/ iy s w=-~~ t O.U E IT-' .C)OL),?~L s ISt- 8t5fi4(/ej\ - - 81, k3&L 3 ~1 +=j l?c r) t=p7-. ?iLto/t TD nu 5 TACLA~~ . f,taZ/E PC/& 20 fMoCiATE \ SOLA7NA &+IC.+/ ! Cf? 9a 07s - 3 5"R NDKVI PLY IO/ -15. Comply with regulations on attached sheet(@. Plan Examiner C&, Date- Report mailed toarchitect - Met with - \ -Attach to Plans - June 13, 1990 ( Mr. Jim Harris L Carlsbad, CA 92008 L Dear Mr. Harris: Enclosed is the hazardous materials information which you re- quested. Please call me if you require anything further. Best regards, . Pat McDougall Plant Manager PM/mr encl cc: Gene Chapo - Architect - P.O. BOX 6169 4645 NORTH AVENUE OCEANSIDE, CA 92056 (619) 941-9550 1-800-BAFFLER e a ID I 0 o 91 E 2 91 F 0 X 0 F n #5 MATERIALS IN USE PRODUCTION FLOOR Hydrocarbon Mixture (140 Solvent) ...................... 2 Gallons Mixed Hydrocarbons (325 Solvent). ...................... 5 Gallons ~poxy Resin....... ..................................... 1 Gallon Naptha 1 Gallon Epoxy Hardener 1 Gallon ......................................... ................................................. FOAM ROOM Methyl Ethyl Keytone ................................... 1 Gallon Polymeric Diphenylmethane Diisocyanate - Foam A.. ...... 1 Gallon Polymeric Alcohol - Foam B........... .................. 1 Gallon SPRAY ROOM Methyl Ethyl Keytone ................................... 1 Gallon Naptha ................................................. 1 Gallon Polyurethane ........................................... 1 Gallon POLISH ROOM Trichloroethane ........................................ 1 Gallon Methyl Ethyl Keytone ................................... 1 Gallon PAINT ROOM Enamel Paint ........................................... 2 Gallons #6 CONTROL AREA #1 - COMPONENTS STORES (CAGE) Methyl Ethyl Keytone ................................ 15 Gallons Polyurethane ........................................ 40 Gallons Lacquer Coating (Sealer) .............................. 20 Gallons VM & P Naptha 15 Gallons 1.1.1. Trichloroethane 15 Gallons Polymeric Diphenylmethane Diisocyanate .............. 15 Gallons Clear Coating ....................................... 10 Gallons Lacquer Thinner ..................................... 15 Gallons Clear Lacquer ........................................ 3 Gallons .............................. ....................................... Polymetric Alcohol .................................. 15 Gallons TOTALS : Flammable Liquids ...... 113 Gallons Combustible Liquids ..... 30 Gallons CONTROL AREA #2 - FOAM ROOM Methyl Ethyl Keytone ................................. 1 Gallon Polymeric Alcohol .................................... 5 Gallons Polymetric Diphenylmethane Diisocyanate .............. 5 Gallons TOTALS : Flammable Liquids ........ 1 Gallon Combustible Liquids. .... 10 Gallons . CONTROL AREA #3 - PRODUCTION FLOOR Hydrocarbon Mixture (140 Solvent) ................... 55 Gallons Mixed Hydrocarbons (Solvent 325) .................... 55 Gallons TOTALS : Combustible Liquids ..... 110 Gallons CONTROL AREA #4 - SPRAY ROOM Methyl 1.1.1. VM&P Ethyl Keytone ................................ 5 Gallons Trichloroethane .............................. 5 Gallons ....................................... ........................................ Polyurethane 3 Gallons Naptha 5 Gallons Lacquer Coating (Sealer) ............................ 1 Gallon Lacquer Thinner ..................................... 1 Gallon TOTAL: Flammable Liquids. ...... 15 Gallons I I 1 I .. I " - 3: 1" 7 L-i .. " ........ .. ...._....-..._.._._ :_. i -1 3i .i I '1' i I I 7 i os I .... -. _. . ....... ,. . "..". .. WI.0' -.- ! !ti?.' -S .- " r Id.0' ' .i 1" t "5 .L "-I I PRINCIPALS TOM F GREEN ENGINEERING GROUP SHkYNt MCDANIEL MFHDI NiGAHBAN P.E SAN DIEGO, CA92123 161 91 292-7894 FAX; 279-1259 April 1, 1991 9320 Chesapeake Dr, Suite 208 Esgil Corporation San Diego, CA 92123 Project: Cobra Gulf Car 1 sbad , CA Ref: Plan Check Correction Plan Check # CB 90-566 (rev) Mechanical: A: The itemized list of the changes on each sheet are as follow: MP- I : a) Natural gas piping diagram revisions- up sized UH-1 thru UH-5 from 200 to 225 mbh each. Added UH-6, AC-10, AC-9, DF-2 added temperature control notes. MP-2 : a) Rerouted ductwork in office areas and resized ductwork to fit available space above suspended ceilings. b) Added R&D Lab spaces & Production/Manager room with additional HVAC unit on roof (AC-9). c) Added rough-in for future sink in R&D Lab. d) Increase AC-I from 3 ton to 5 ton along with appropriate duct sizes. e) Added computer room unit CRU-1 for computer room #136. MP-3 : a) DH-1 & DH-2 omitted. Added DF-2 for HV-1 system. b) Added DH-4 and re-specified Humidifier for HV-3. c) Omitted transfer grilles for drying room. d) Added 85% Eff. filters to HV-4 and recirculation ducts. e) Omitted Exhaust fan (EF-6). f) Added Polishing office t105 to AC-IO. g) Removed DH-3, Revised HV-5 capacity, added AC-IO. h) Eliminated supply duct from HV-6 to Polishing office t 105. g) Added Unit Heater (UH-6). i) Increase Capacity of UH-3,4,5 to 225 mbh each. MP-4 : a) Increased capacity of AC-6 from 2 ton to 4 ton. Note roof plan AC units were not tagged properly on original drawings. b) Added AC-9 c) resized and rerouted ductwork to fit available space. d) Upsized AC-1 from 3 to 5 tons. MP-5: a) Added AC-9, AC-IO, CU-1 on roof. b) Omitted EF-6 from roof. c) Added transfer grilles to toilet & shower rooms detail 3/MP-5. MP-6 : a) Revised equipment schedule to conform to plan changes MP-1 thru MP-5. MP-7: a) Revised Title 24 to conform to space revisions. INTERIM FINAL SOILS REPORT: ROUGH GRADING CARISEAD TRACT 85-24, UNIT 4, LOT 70 CARLSEAD RESEARCH CENTER CARISBAD, CALIFORNIA FOR ALAN BLACKMORE C/O BRUCE MCWNALD'S CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92106 P.O. BOX 6036 W.O. 1219-SD 0CM)BER 18, 1990 CeoSofls, Inc. ENGINEERING GEOLOGY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 SOIL ENGINEERING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Preparation of Existing Ground and Fill Placement . . . 2 Slopes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Field Testing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Moisture-Density Relations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Expansive Soils . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 RECOMMENDATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Presoaking Beneath Slabs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Retaining Walls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 POST GRADING CRITERIA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Additional Grading . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Additional site Improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Landscape Maintenance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Drainage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Planters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Trench Backfill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Footing Trench Excavations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 PAVEMENT DESIGN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 REGULATORY COMPLIANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 GeoSoib, Znc. - - Geotechnical Engineering Engineering Geology - 5741 Palmer Way * Carlsbad, California 92006 (6191 436-3155 -FAX [619) 931-0915 October 18, 1990 W.O. 1219-SD MR. ALAN BLACKMORE - c/o Bruce McDonald's Construction Management P.O. Box 6036 San Diego, California 92106 - Subject : Interim Final Soils Report: Rough Grading Carlsbad Tract 85-24, Unit 4, Lot 70 Carlsbad, California Carlsbad Research Center - Reference: "Preliminary Geotechnical Study Lot 70, Carlsbad Tract 85-24, Unit 4 Carlsbad, California", by GeoSoils, Inc. Dated December 6, 1989, W.O. 1113-SD. - Carlsbad Research Center r-. Gentlemen: This report presents a summary of geotechnical observation and testing provided by GeoSoils, Inc. during earthwork performed to date for the proposed Cobra Golf Facility at the above subject site. Earthwork for the parking areas is ongoing and a final soils report will be issued after all phases of development is complete. The purpose of grading was to construct one level pad for a 60,129(f) square foot industrial building, and associated parking areas and driveways. Earthwork, for this previously graded site (Reference), has been performed in accordance with recommendations presented in the above referenced preliminary Los Angeles Go. (818) 785-2158 * Omnge Ca (714) 647-0277 Riverside Go. (714) 677-9651 GeoSoils, Znc. - COBRA GOLF FACILITY w.0. 1219-s~ - OCTOBER 18, 1990 PAGE 2 - soils report dated December 15, 1989. This phase of rough grading began on October 2, 1990 and was completed on October 16, - 1990. ENGINEERING GEOLOGY c Geologic conditions exposed during grading were periodically observed by our project geologist/engineer. Fill was excavated along the westerly and easterly portions of the lot (see Plates 1 and 2). Bedrock materials, exposed at grade in the central portion of the building, and underlying the site, consisted of sandstone and siltstone deposits of the Eocene Age Santiago Formation and volcanic/metavolcanic rock of the Jurassic Age Santiago Peak Volcanics. Plates 1 and 2 graphically delineates the relationship between previously placed (Oaf), fill placed during this phase of grading (af) and bedrock (Tsa/Jsp). SOIL ENGINEERING Preuaration of Existinq Ground and Fill Placement 1. Deleterious material such as concentrated organic matter and miscellaneous debris were disposed of offsite prior to placing any fill. GeoSoits, fnc. COBRA GOLF FACILITY W.O. 1219-SD OCTOBER 18, 1990 PAGE 3 2. The existing '*cut** portion of the pad was overexcavated a minimum depth of five (+) foot below proposed grade, to at least five (k) foot outside the building envelope, and brought back to proposed grade with properly compacted fill. This created a footings. As referred to was excavated Avenue. This uniform three (*)foot fill blanket beneath in the referenced report, hard volcanic rock within the building envelope near Aston dense, blocky rock caused locally, very difficult ripping from the surface with a D-8 Cat dozer. Angular blocks up to 5 (+) foot in one dimension were generated. Difficult to very difficult excavating should be anticipated at or near grade in pavement and landscaping areas near Aston Avenue (refer to on Plate 1). Bedrock exposed in other landscape areas may not be suitable for certain vegetation in its natural state. 3. After completing removals, areas to receive fill were scarified, moisture conditioned and compacted. 4. Maximum thickness of fill placed during this phase of grading was approximately nine (t) foot, in the loading dock portion of the building. It is our understanding that this was done to create a three (+) foot fill blanket beneath Itdeeperlt wall footings at the request of the architect. CeoSotls, Inc. COBRA GOLF FACILITY w.0. 1219-s~ OCTOBER 18, 1990 PAGE 4 5. Fill consisted of onsite soils which were placed in thin lifts, approximately six to eight inches in thickness, brought to at least optimum moisture content and compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction. Where previous fill soils were found to be at least five(*) foot thick below proposed grades, reprocessing was achieved to a minimum depth of two(+) foot, as recommended in our referenced report. Slopes 1. Minor landscape area slopes, on the order of five (k) foot high, were generated during this phase of grading. Existing perimeter slopes are currently planted. Irrigation for planted areas on and above slopes should be minimized to just support the vegetation, to avoid developing artificial groundwater accumulations and to avoid surface ponding due to typically low percolation characteristics of onsite materials. Drought resistent vegetation, tolerant to relatively high salt contents should be considered. 2. As indicated in the referenced report by San Diego Geotechnical Consultants, Inc., all slopes are considered grossly and surficially stable and should remain so under normal conditions of rainfall, provided an adequate program of landscaping and maintenance is followed. GeoSoils, Inc. COBRA GOLF FACILITY W.O. 1219-SD OCTOBER 18, 1990 PAGE 5 Field Testing 1. Field density tests were performed using the sand cone method (ASTM D-1556-82) and the Nuclear Density Method (ASTM D-2922-81). Test locations are plotted on the enclosed Plates 1 and 2 (Compaction Test Location Maps), prepared by Sowards and Brown Engineering. Results are provided in Table I. 2. Field density tests were taken at periodic intervals and random locations to check the compaction effort by the contractor. Where test results indicated that the desired compaction or moisture standard was not obtained, the contractor was notified and the area was reworked until retesting indicated minimum standards were obtained. Based on the grading operations observed, test results herein are considered representative of the compacted fill. 3. Visual classification of the soils in the field was the basis for determining which maximum density value to use for a given density test. Moisture-Density Relations Laboratory maximum dry density and optimum moisture content for each of the major soil types was determined according to test method ASTM D-1557-78. The following table presents the results: GeoSoils, Znc. COBRA GOLF FACILITY W.O. 1219-SD OCTOBER 18, 1990 PAGE 6 Soil "-me Density IDC fl Content % Maximum Dry Optimum Moisture A-Yellowish gray sandy silt 121.0 B-Olive gray sandy clay/gravel 112.5 C-Dark yellow brown sandy clay 115.0 D-Yellowish brown clayey sand with gravel 126.5 13.0 18.0 17.5 12.0 ExDansive Soils Expansive soil conditions have been evaluated for the finished pad. Representative samples of soils (6) near pad grade were recovered for classification and expansion testing. 1. Swell tests were performed on remolded samples compacted to 90 percent maximum density at 80 percent of optimum moisture in a brass ring having an inside diameter of 2.365 inches and a height of 1.0 inches. Surcharge loads of 60 psf were applied and each sample was submerged in water for 24 hours. Vertical swell was recorded as a percentage of the original sample height. 2. Expansion Index tests were also performed for typical soil types. Testing was performed in accordance with Standard 29-2 of the Uniform Building Code. 3. The expansion potential for various finish grade tests ranged from 6.3 to 14.7 percent, which is considered moderately to critically expansive. GeoSoils, Znc. COBRA GOLF FACILITY W.O. 1219-SD EEC0"ENDATIONS OCTOBER 18, 1990 PAGE 7 Footings on compacted fill should be designed for a maximum allowable bearing value of 1500 pounds per square foot. Due to the expansive soil encountered during the grading operation footings should be founded at least 18 inches below the lowest adjacent grade. Proposed caissons foundation should be penetrated through the fill and founded into the underlying bedrock as recommended in our referenced report. Presoakins Beneath Slabs Slab subgrades soils should be presoaked to at least 120 percent of the optimum moisture content to a depth of 18 inches below the subgrade prior to placement of concrete. The moisture penetration should be verified by this office prior to placement of visqueen. Retainins Walls Recommendations presented below are for cantilever retaining walls up to 7 feet in height and backfilled with low expansive granular backfill. Retaining walls may be designed for an equivalent fluid pressure as shown on the table below. Active earth pressure may be used for retaining wall design, provided the top is not restrained from minor deflections. An GeoSoils, Inc. r COBRA GOLF FACILITY W.O. 1219-SD 7 OCTOBER 18, 1990 PAGE 8 - equivalent fluid pressure approach may be used to compute the horizontal pressure against the wall. Appropriate fluid unit weights are provided below for specific slope gradients of the retained material. These do not include other superimposed loading conditions such as traffic, structures, seismic events or - L ..- adverse geologic conditions. 7 Surface Slope of Equivalent Retained Material Fluid Weight Horizontal to Vertical Lb./ 3 Level 2 to 1 30 43 Retaining walls should be provided with an adequate pipe and gravel backdrain system covered with a minimum of 12 inches of 3/4 inch clean crushed rock completely wrapped in filter fabric, to prevent build up to hydrostatic pressures. A minimum two(+) foot thick compacted fill cap of native material should also be provided at the surface, along with proper surface drainage devices. Horizontal distances measuring from the corner of the wall equal to the height are considered as restrained wall. Foundations may be designed as per the "Foundation Recommendations" section of the referenced report. r- GeoSoils, Znc. COBRA GOLF FACILITY W.O. 1219-SD OCTOBER 18, 1990 PAGE 9 At-rest pressures equivalent to pressure exerted by fluid having a density of 60 pounds per cubic foot should be used in the design of a restrained retaining wall. POST GRADING CRITERIA Additional Gradinq This office should be notified in advance of any additional fill placement, regrading of the site, or trench backfilling after rough grading has been completed. This includes completion of grading in the street and parking areas, utility trench and/or retaining wall backfills. Footing trench spoil and any excess soils generated from utility trench excavations should be compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent if not removed from the site. Additional Site ImDrovements Recommendations for exterior concrete flatwork design and construction can be provided upon request. It is important that the expansive nature of the soil be considered in design and construction. At a minimum flatwork should be provided with control joints and subgrade soils should be well wetted prior to pouring concrete. Some displacement along joints between different elements (e.g. curbs vs sidewalks) should be anticipated. GeoSofls, Inc. COBRA GOLF FACILITY W.O. 1219-SD OCTOBER 18, 1990 PAGE 10 If in the future, any additional improvements are planned for the site, recommendations concerning the geological or geotechnical aspects of design and construction of said improvements could be provided upon request. LandSCaDe Maintenance Water is known to weaken the inherent strength of all earth materials and cause soil expansion. Only the amount of irrigation necessary to sustain plant life should be provided. Over-watering the landscaped areas could adversely affect the proposed site improvements, especially considering the typical low permeability of onsite earth materials. Drainaae Positive site drainage should be maintained at all times. Drainage should not flow uncontrolled down any descending slope. Water, including irrigation water, should be directed away from the foundation and not allowed to pond and seep into the ground. This is especially important, given the relatively low permeability rates of earth materials in other sites within the Carlsbad Research Center. Pad drainage should be directed toward the street or other approved area. Consideration should be given to placing drains in landscaped areas to improve drainage and substantially decrease unsightly seepage and staining of flatwork and asphalt. GeoSoiZs, Inc. COBRA GOLF FACILITY W.O. 1219-SD OCTOBER 18, 1990 PAGE 11 Planters It is recommended that any proposed planters against the structure be of closed bottom type, placing a drain in the bottom to be outletted away from the structure, or any exterior concrete flatwork on the improvements. Footina Trench Excavations All footing trench excavations should be observed by a representative of this is office prior to the placement of reinforcement. Trench Backfill All utility trench backfill should be placed to the following standards: 1. Ninety percent of the laboratory standard if native material is used as backfill. 2. As an alternative, for the interior of the slab, clean sand (SE>30) maybe utilized and jetted or flooded in place, 90 percent relative compaction is recommended. Observation, probing, and testing to verify adequate results is recommended. Care should be taken to not over saturate the sand. 3. Exterior trenches, paralleling a footing and extending below a 1:l plane projected from the outside bottom edge of the footing should be compacted to 90 percent of the GeoSolls, Inc. COBRA GOLF FACILIW W.O. 1219-SD OCTOBER 18, 1990 PAGE 12 laboratory standard. Sand backfill, unless it is similar to the in place fill, should not be allowed in these trench backfill areas. Density testing along with probing should be accomplished to verify the desired results. 4. 5. Regulations of the governing agency may supersede the above. All trench excavations should conform to all applicable safety codes. PAVEWENT DESIGN Representative samples (4) of fill and bedrock material exposed at subgrade in the pavement areas were collected for **R*'-Value determination. Results of this testing will be reported as soon as they are completed. REGULATORY COMPLIANCE Cuts, fills, and processing of original ground under the purview of this report have been completed under the observation of, and with selective testing by GeoSoils, Inc. and are found to be in compliance with the Grading Code of the City of Carlsbad, California. Our findings were made and recommendations prepared in conformance with generally accepted professional engineering GeoSoils, Inc. COBRA GOLF FACILITY W.O. 1219-SD OCTOBER 18, 1990 PAGE 13 practices and no further warranty is implied nor made. This report is subject to review by the controlling authorities for this project . If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to call our office. Very truly yours, GeoSoils, Inc. Edward P. Lump Staff Geologist ’ - EPL/VS/TEM/mc 1%; Enclosures: Reference Table I, Field Density Test Res _e Plates 1 and 2, Compaction Locatih cc: (5) Addressee (1) Gene Chapo Associates c - - CeoSoils, Inc. "As graded Geotechnical Report, Carlsbad Research Center, Phases Consultants, Inc., dated April 1, 1988, ob NO. 05-2863-066-00- 111, IV and V, Lots 9-70, 104 & 108, by San Diego Geotechnical 10. - - GeoSoiIs, Inc. PROJECT NAME: LOT 70 CLIENT: COBRA-BLACKMORE Y.0.: 1219-SO DATE: 10190 TABLE I FIELD DEMSITY TEST RESULTS Dry Relative Date of Test Test Yo Test Location Elevation (2) (DCf > (X) TYDe TYDe Moisture Density Compaction Test Soil 10-05-90 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10-08-90 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 10-09-90 17A 1 8A 19 20 10-10-90 21 22 23 24 25 10-11-90 26 SE LOT 70 SE LOT 70 SE LOT 70 SE LOT 70 NU LOADING RAMP NU LOT 70 NU LOADING RAMP NU LOT 70 NU LOT 70 NU LOT 70 SU LOT 70 SU LOT 70 SU LOT 70 NE LOT 70 NU LOT 70 SE LOT 70 SE LOT 70 SE LOT 70 SE LOT 70 SE LOT 70 SE LOT 70 SE LOT 70 NU LOT 70 SE LOT 70 NE LOT 70 NU LOT 70 NU LOT 70 SE LANDSCAPE AREA 27 SE LANDSCAPE AREA 248.0' 249.0' 248.0' 245.0' 249.0' 244.0' 247.0' 245.0' 248.0' 249.0' 252.0' 251 .O' 250.5' 251 .O' 250.0' 250.0' 250.0' 250.0' 251.0' 251 .O' 250.0' 252.5' 252.0' 252.0' 252.5' 251 .O' 250.0' 251 .Os 250.0' 15.5 14.9 13.5 14.2 12.2 12.5 13.1 13.0 13.0 19.0 18.8 15.5 14.7 13.9 13.6 13.6 11.2 10.6 19.8 18.7 19.4 19.2 19.8 20.3 18.1 20.2 19.2 19.2 19.8 114.7 118.9 115.7 116.4 114.2 112.2 109.1 109.3 110.2 104.9 102.1 108.4 108.9 111.1 111.4 108.1 103.8 103.4 104.2 108.7 104.7 104.9 101.3 106.6 101.0 102.1 107.1 107.2 102.1 95 95 ND ND 94 ND 92 ND 94 St 93 ND 90 NO 90 NO 91 NO 91 91 NO NO 90 sc 91 ND 92 ND 92 NO 90 sc 90 sc 90 sc 96 92 sc sc 92 93 St sc 90 sc 92 sc 90 sc 91 sc 93 sc 93 ND 91 ND A A D D D A D A A C B A A A A A C C B B B B B C 8 B C C 8 GeoSoils, Inc. - PROJECT YAWE: LOT 70 - CLIENT: COBRA-BLACKMORE Y.O.: 1219-SD DATE: lOl90 TABLE I FIELD DEYSITT TEST RESULTS Dry Date of Test Relative Test Yo Test Location Elevation <I) (DCf) <x> TYoe TyDe Moisture Density Compaction Test Soil 10-11-90 FG1 SU LOT 70 253.0' 18.7 108.3 96 FG2 SU LOT 70 253.0' 19.8 110.5 SC B 95 FG3 NU LOT 70 253.0' 20.1 SC c 110.8 96 SC c FG4 NU LOT 70 FG5 SE LOT 70 253.0' 18.9 109.3 96 SC B 253.0' 18.3 110.1 95 SC c FG6 SE LOT 70 253.0' 18.6 108.1 94 FG7 NE LOT 70 ND 253.0' 18.8 107.3 93 ND C c FG8 NE LOT 70 253.0' 19.2 110.7 96 NO c FG9 NE LOT 70 253.0' 18.8 110.0 95 ND B MOTE: ID = NUCLEAR DEYSITT CAUCE TESTING SC = SAYDCOYE TESTIYE A = RETEST F6 = FIYISWED 6RADE TESTIYS GeoSofls, Znc. LOT 70, CARLSBAD TRACT 85-4, UNIT 4 PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL STUDY CARISBAD RESEARCH CENTER CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA COBRA-BLACKMORE P.O. BOX 424 RANCHO SANTA FE, CALIFORNIA 92067 W.O. 1113-SD DECEMIjER 6, 1989 GeoSoils, Inc. . . . TABLE OF CONTENTS . . . . . . . . . . . L . . . . PROPOSED SITE DEVELOPMENT .................. 2 SITE DESCRIPTION ...................... 3 EXPLORATION AND TESTING ................... 4 EARTH MATERIALS ....................... 4 Fill Materials .................... 4 Santiago Formation .................. 6 Santiago Peak Volcanics ................ 6 GROUNDWATER ......................... 7 FAULTING AND REGIONAL SEISMICITY .............. 7 CONCLUSIONS ......................... 8 9 Design of Floor Slab ................. 14 RECOMMENDATIONS . FOUNDATIONS ................ RECOMMENDATIONS . GRADING .................. 16 Fill Placement .................... 16 Lot Capping ...................... 16 Rock Hardness ..................... 17 Earth Work Balancing ................. 17 Grading Guidelines .................. 18 RETAINING WALL DESIGN ..................... 18 Active Earth Pressure ................. 18 PAVEMENT DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS ............... 19 Concrete Design .................... 21 Subgrade. Aggregate Base Compaction .......... 21 WST GRADING CRITERIA .................... 21 Additional Grading .................. 21 Footing Trench Excavation ............... 22 Drainage ....................... 22 Trench Backfill .................... 22 PLAN REVIEW ......................... 23 LIMITATIONS ......................... 24 GeoSoils. Inc . r r i- r I r i I- Geotechnical Engineering * Engineering Geology 5751 Palmer Way, Suite D . Carlsbad, California 92008 * [619) 438-3155 * FAX 1619) 931-0915 Decmeber 6, 1989 W.O. 1113-SD COBRA-BLACKMORE Rancho Santa Fe, California 92067 P.O. Box 424 Attention: Mr. Alan J. Blackmore Subject : Preliminary Geotechnical Study Lot 70, Carlsbad Tract 85-24, Unit 4 Carlsbad Research Center Carlsbad, California Reference: Center, Phases 111, IV and V, Lots 9-70, 104 & "As Graded Geotechnical Report, Carlsbad Research 108", by San Diego Geotechnical Consultants, Inc., dated April 1, 1988, Job No. 05-2863-066-00-10. Gentlemen: This report presents the results of our preliminary geotechnical study of Lot 70 of Carlsbad Tract 85-24 on Aston Avenue in the Carlsbad Research Center. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the nature of subsurface earth materials on site, ascertain their engineering properties, and to provide recommendations for site preparation, foundation design, retaining wall design, grading and pavement design. This study included review of the referenced report, excavating 17 exploratory test pits, obtaining representative soil samples, Las Angeles Co. (818) 785-2158 - Omnge Co. (714) 647-0277 * Riverside Co. (714) 677-9651 COBRA-BLACKMORE W.O. 1113-SD DECEMBER 6, 1989 PAGE 2 in place density testing, laboratory testing and analysis, and geologic and engineering analyses. PROPOSED SITE DEVELOPMENT Information concerning the proposed development was furnished by Mr. Alan Blackmore and Mr. Gene Chapo of Gene Chapo Associates, Architects who provided a 11'=201 Scale Site Plan. It is our understanding that minor re-grading is proposed to create a level building pad for a 60,129 square foot concrete tilt-up industrial building and parking areas. Plans indicate that the front of the building is to be a two-story office area with a rear warehouse. Wall loads are anticipated to be 3 to 4 kips per lineal foot with isolated column loads up to 80 kips total. In the event that any significant changes in the design or location of the building as outlined in this report are planned, the conclusions and recommendations contained in this report shall not be considered valid unless changes are reviewed and the conclusions of this report modified or approved in writing by the geotechnical consultants. GeoSoils, Inc. COBRA-BLACKMORE W.O. 1113-SD SITE DESCRIPTION DECEMBER 6, 1989 PAGE 3 The property is Lot 70, Tract 85-24 located within Unit 4 of Carlsbad Research Center, Carlsbad, California. The irregular- shaped site comprises approximately 3.8 (?) acres. Access to the site is from the southeast via Aston Avenue. Vacant, industrial lots are located to the south and east. Existing 2:l or flatter cut and fill slopes descend to lower vacant parcels. The site was previously graded in 1987 to 1988. Grading consisted of both cut and fill. Maximum cut was approximately 10 to 12 feet near Test Pit TP-10 and the deepest fill per the grading plan is about 20 feet. The site is fairly flat sloping about 1% to the northeast corner. Grading generated both the cut and fill slopes at 2 : 1 gradients or flatter. The highest slope adjacent to the site is the slope which descends to the north. Rutherford Road comprises the northern boundary of Lot 16.There is a 25 foot wide drainage and access easement which parallels the east property line. Sparse thin grasses and small rock fragments are located on the relatively flat site. A dirt access road to a shooting range dissects the southerly portion of the lot. GeoSofls, fnc. COBRA-BLACKMORE W.O. 1113-SD EXPLORATION AND TESTING DECEMBER 6, 1989 PAGE 4 The site was explored on November 7 and 11, 1989 by excavating 17 backhoe test pits. Test pits varied in depth from 1.5 to 15.5 feet. Test pit locations are shown on the enclosed Site Plan, Plate 1, which uses a 1"=30' scale site plan provided by Gene Chapo Associates, Architects as a base map. Logs of earth materials in the test pits are in Appendix I. Samples of bedrock and existing fill materials were tested as indicated in Appendix 11. Two 'R*-value determinations were performed on a representative surficial material. The result of the tests are included in the back of the report. The R-value of obtained were used in the design of the flexible pavement. Earth materials within the subject area consist of artificial fill and bedrock of both the Santiago Formation (Eocene Age) and the Santiago Peak Volcanics (Jurassic Age). Fill Materials Fill is principally gray and brown gravelly clays. The gravels Comprise up to 50f percent of the material and are both volcanic CeoSoils, Inc. c COBRA-BLACKMORE W.O. 1113-SD DECEMBER 6, 1989 PAGE 5 and claystone rock fragments. The fragments are in size up to about 18 inches, some larger (>2 feet) rock fragments were also encountered. The clay matrix was generally found to be moist and stiff. These materials were found to be uniformly moist and adequately compact on the western side of the lot. The smaller fills on the east side of the lot displays some variation in moisture and compaction. The maximum depth of fill is indicated on the mass grading plan to be up to 20 feet thick the maximum depth explored was 12 in TP-5. Fill materials on the lot were placed with testing and observation provided by San Diego Soil Engineering, Inc. While the referenced report does not specifically cover the lot: compaction testing performed on the lot was in the report. We have been unable to obtain the final report specific to this. Their compaction test results indicated that fill soils were placed at least optimum moisture contents and at a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent. Our testing indicates localized zones not meeting this typical standard. Local zones not meeting a 90 percent compaction standard are fairly common in larger fills and do not indicate the overall fill is below standard. The majority of tests results indicating less than desired compaction are in the upper 2 feet. GeoSoils, Inc. COBRA-BLACKMORE W.O. 1113-SD DECEMBER 6, 1989 PAGE 6 Santiaso Formation (map symbol Ts) Santiago Formation of Eocene Age was encountered below the fill in the southwest portion of the lot. It consists of light gray silty sandstone. This formation was found to be medium dense and slightly moist to moist. Santiaso Peak Volcanics (map symbol Jsp) Onsite the Jurassic Santiago Volcanics were found to consist of at least two distinctive materials. One type, possibly representing a contact "bake zone" between the sedimentary unit and the volcanic unit was red, purple, gray, medium dense, hard and crumbly with local oxidation. The typical volcanic rock encountered was found to be brown, orange and gray, medium dense to dense, brittle and highly fractured and oxidized. Typically, these bedrock materials becomes less fractured and weathered and more dense rapidly with depth. Grading plans in the referenced report indicate that up to 12 (t) foot of cut was made during rough grading of the site. In this case, difficult ripping or blasting should be anticipated in cut areas where grades are proposed to be lowered. Blasting may also be anticipated in utility trenches within the existing cut area. Moderate to poor quality fill material should be produced from cuts within the volcanic rock. Consideration should be given to GeoSoils, Inc. COBRA-BLACKMORE W.O. 1113-SD DECEMBER 6, 1989 PAGE 7 importing fill materials for the building pad area and utility trenches. GROUNDWATER Groundwater was not encountered on the property in our test pits. On the westerly portion of the lot, the sandstone bedrock was moist with no free water. We do not anticipate groundwater to effect site development. Surface drainage on the site is by sheetflow to the northern portion of the site. No excessive erosion was noted on the lot during our study. FAULTING AND REGIONAL SEISMICITY The site, as all of Southern California, is in a seismically active region. State of the art interpretations regarding various faults and general tectonics evolve based on an ever increasing data base. Our research and on site exploration does not indicate any active or potentially active faults currently - - - mapped in the immediate vicinity of the site. There are however numerous faults within 100 kilometers of the site which are considered active or potential active. These would have an 7 GeoSofls, Inc. COBRA-BLACKMORE W.O. 1113-SD DECEMBER 6, 1989 PAGE 8 affect on the site in the form of ground shaking, should they be the source of an earthquake. The probability of ground acceleration at the site may be considered as approximately similar to the probability for the Southern California region as a whole. The relationship of the site to the major mapped faults within Southern California is indicated on the Fault Map of southern California, Figure 1. It is our opinion that the faults most likely to effect this site are the Elsinore Fault zone located about 22 miles northeast, possible offshore extensions of the Rose Canyon Fault perhaps 7 miles southwest and the Coronado Bank Fault about 30 miles southwest. Given the known relative activity it is our opinion a magnitude 6.5 to 6.7 earthquake on the Elsinore is the most likely event to affect the site producing repeatable ground acceleration of approximately .lag (Ploessel and Slosson, 1974). CONCLZJSIONS The site is suitable for the proposed development provided that the recommendation offered in the following sections of this report are implemented during design and construction. The existing site condition will need to be considered and accounted for both during design and construction. CeoSofls, Inc. 5 Modified after Friedman and Others, 1976 FAULT MAP ,, ,: <&, :. ,, .. OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GeoSob, ' BY GSI w.0. NQ 1113-SD DATE 1.2189 . ., Soil Mechanics Geology Foundation Engineering PTCIIRP 1 COBRA-BLACKMOFU3 W.O. 1113-SD DECEMBER 6, 1989 PAGE 9 L The proposed building would be underlain by hard dense volcanic rock at shallow depth as well as existing fill varying up to approximately 15 feet deep. Highly variable foundation material such as these are not desirable. As such, outlined in the recommendations below are three options that can be used for site development. The most appropriate alternative will depend on various factors including but not limited to the following. * Nature and extent of proposed grading; particularly the * Bearing capacity desired/needed by the structural engineer. proposed finish grade beneath the building. Costs of construction. RECOmNDATIONS - FOUNDATIONS The three options for foundation design and site preparation within the building envelope are presented below. Allowable bearing capacities and other criteria vary with each alternate. Design parameters for concrete slabs, retaining walls paving, etc. are presented separately. Alternative I The first alternative is to provide a minimum of three feet of 90% compacted fill material below the base of all footings. This can be achieved by either raising existing grades in areas of GeoSofls, Inc. COBRA-BLACKMORE W.O. 1113-SD DECEMBER 6, 1989 PAGE 10 shallow bedrock or by overexcavating the bedrock and replacement as compacted fill. In some areas difficult ripping and possibly blasting should be anticipated for cuts more than 1i to 2 feet below existing grade. The areas of existing fill having approximately 5 feet of fill at the completion of grading should not need reprocessing other than the upper 2 feet below existing grade. Using this method, foundations may be designed as follows: Allowable bearing capacity of 1500 pound per square foot (psf) at a minimum depth of 18 inches below lowest adjacent grade may be utilized. A minimum soil penetration of 12 inches and a minimum width of 12 inches is recommended. Allowable bearing value may be increased by 150 psf to a maximum of 2500 psf for each addition foot of width or depth. The above values may be increased by one third for seismic or other temporary loads. Passive earth pressure of 150 pounds per square foot per foot (psf/f) of compacted material may be utilized in the design. A maximum earth pressure of 1500 psf may be used. An allowable coefficient of friction of 0.35 may be utilized in the design for the concrete against compacted fill materials with the dead load forces. GeoSofls, Inc. COBRA-BL"IORE W.O. 1113-SD DECEMBER 6, 1989 PAGE 11 When combining passive and frictional resistance, the passive pressure component should be reduced by one third. Alternative I1 The second alternate provides for increased bearing capacity by providing a 3 foot thick blanket of 95% compacted fill beneath the base of footings across the entire building. Fill above the footing bottom should be compacted to 90%. Methods to obtain the necessary fill depth on areas of shallow bed rock are discussed above. It would be necessary to overexcavated and recompact to a depth 3 feet below the base of footings in the existing fill. Using the 95% fill blanket the following foundation criteria would apply. An allowable bearing value of 2500 psf may be used for footings having a minimum depth of 18 inches below the lowest adjacent grade, a minimum 12 inches soil penetration and a minimum width of 12 inches. Bearing value may be increased by 250 psf to a maximum of 3500 psf for each additional foot of depth or width. If bearing exceeds 3000 psf, footings should have a minimum depth of 24 inches. The above values may be increased by one third for seismic or other temporary loads. GeoSoils, Inc. COBRA-BLACKMORE W.O. 1113-SD DECEMBER 6, 1989 PAGE 12 Passive earth pressure of 150 psf/f of compacted material may be utilized in the design. A maximum earth pressure of 1500 psf may be used. An allowable coefficient of friction of 0.35 may be utilized in the design for the concrete against compacted fill materials with the dead load forces. When combining passive and frictional resistance, the passive pressure component should be reduced by one third. Alternative I11 The third option involves less grading, a deepened foundation system and provides for higher bearing capacities. No specific site processing is needed for foundations. A minimum of 2 feet of compacted fill should provide for subgrade for the slab. All foundations should be extended into bedrock; a combination of spread footings and caissons could be utilized. Spread footings could be used in areas of shallow fill or rock with caissons extending through the fill in deeper areas. Spread footings in the volcanic rock may be design as follows. An allowable bearing value of 3500 psf may be used at a minimum depth of 18 inches below lowest adjacent grade with a minimum penetration of 12 inches into competent rock and a minimum width GeoSoils, Inc. COBRA-BLACKMORE W.O. 1113-SD DECEMBER 6, 1989 PAGE 13 of 12 inches. Bearing capacity may be increased by 300 psf for each additional foot of width or depth to a maximum of 6000 psf. If bearing exceeds 4000 psf footings should be at least 24 inches deep with 18 inches penetration into bedrock. The above values may be increased by one third for seismic or other temporary loads. Passive earth pressure of 250 psf/f for competent rock, may be utilized in the design. A maximum earth pressure of 3500 pounds psf may be used. An allowable coefficient of friction of 0.45 may be utilized in the design for the concrete against competent rock with the dead load forces. When combining passive and frictional resistance, the passive pressure component should be reduced by one third. Caissons would likely be placed both in volcanic rock and Santiago Formation. The estimated contact between the two rock types is indicated on Plate 1. The specific location should be verified in the field during construction. The caissons in Santiago Formation may be designed as follows: An allowable bearing capacity of 4500 psf may be used for and bearing caissons having a 24 inch minimum diameter and extending a minimum of 5 feet into competent sandstone. GeoSoiIs, Inc. COBRA-BLACKMORE W.O. 1113-SD DECEMBER 6, 1989 PAGE 14 Caissons in the volcanic rock may be designed as follows: An allowable bearing capacity of 6000 psf may be used for end bearing caissons having a 24 inch minimum diameter and extending a minimum of 3 feet into competent rock. The bearing values indicated above may be increased by one third for seismic or other temporary loads. Passive earth pressures may be computed as an equivalent fluid pressure using the design parameters outlined as follows: Equivalent Fluid Pressure Maximum Earth Pressure DSf/ft Allowed DSf Compacted Fill 150 Santiago Formation 450 Volcanic rock 850 2500 8000 6000 All caissons may use the following criteria: 1) Fixity may be assumed at the top of the caisson. 2) The existing fill as well as any additional fill may be used to develop passive resistance. Desim of Floor Slab Concrete slab on grade construction is anticipated. The following criteria are considered minimum design parameters for the slab; are in no way they intended to supersede design by the structural engineer. They do not account for concentrated loads from fork lifts or other machinery. CeoSofls, Ine. COBRA-BLACKMORE W.O. 1113-SD DECEMBER 6, 1989 PAGE 15 Modulus of subgrade (reaction (k) of 125 PC should be used in the design of the floor slab supporting heavy truck traffic, fork lifts, machine foundations and heavy storage areas. The subgrade should be compacted to a minimum 95 percent of the maximum laboratory dry density. The slabs in the office and areas which will receive relatively light live loads should be a minimum of 4 inches thick (actual not nominal) and reinforced with No. 3 reinforcing bar on 18 inches centers both ways. Reinforcing should be properly supported to ensure placement near the vertical midpoint. Slabs should be underlain by 4 inches of crushed rock, gravel or sand. In areas where moisture condensation is undesirable, (e.g. areas to have floor coverings) a minimum 6 mil plastic membrane should be placed. The membrane should be sandwiched between one inch minimum sand layers. These areas should be separate from areas not similarly protected. This separation could be provided with a concrete cut of wall extending at least 6 inches into the subgrade soil. GeoSoils, Inc. COBRA-BLACKMORE W.O. 1113-SD RECOMMENDATIONS - GRADING DECEMBW 6, 1989 PAGE 16 The extent of grading will depend largely of the selection of foundation design. Basic guidelines for grading are presented in Appendix 111. Some specific comments are offered below. Pill Placement Guidelines for fill placement are in Appendix 111. If the 95 percent compacted blanket is used it will be necessary to place the fill at or above optimum moisture. It is advisable that the upper 2 to 3 feet of material below the building be placed at 3 to 5 percent above optimum, assuming it is comprised of the on site clayey soils. Lot CaDDinq care should be taken to avoid placing rock fragments larger than eight inches in one dimension within five feet of pad grade. The cut portion of the lot should be overexcavated within the building areas to a minimum depth as determined based on the foundation design selected and replaced with properly compacted fill, providing uniform foundation support conditions. The upper two feet of the existing fill should be removed and recompacted due to drying and desiccation which has resulted in less than desired compaction. GeoSofls, Znc. COBRA-BLACKMORE W.O. 1113-SD DECEMBER 6, 1989 PAGE 17 Overexcavation of the cut portion of the parking area exposing hard rock should also be considered to facilitate trenching for utilities. Rock Hardness Based on our observations of surface conditions, it appears that the upper, more weathered and more easily excavated zone has been removed over much of the cut portions on the lot. Very difficult excavating and/or blasting for the building pad fill blanket and/or utility trenches should be anticipated. Over-excavating the rock to maximum invert depths in utility trenches and replacing it with compacted fill might be considered. However, this would generate some oversize material which would require special handling. Should blasting be needed, it is important that the blasting procedures utilized produce predominantly smaller material (less than 8 inches). Earth Work Balancing Earthwork balancing on sites of this nature is complex with numerous factors to considered. It is probable that the most important factors on this site are a) bulking of bedrock, b) spoil generated from trenches and footings, c) pavement section and, d) an accurate initial topographic map. GeoSoils, Inc. COBRA-BLACKMORE W.O. 1113-SD DECEMBER 6, 1989 PAGE 18 Gradinq Guidelines Grading should be performed to at least the minimum requirements of the Grading Code of the City of Carlsbad, Chapter 70 of the Uniform Building Code and the Grading Guidelines presented in Appendix 111. RETAINING WALL DESIGN The recommendations presented below are for cantelivered retaining walls up to 7 feet high. All retaining walls should be provided with an adequate backdrain system, to prevent buildup of hydrostatic pressures and be designed in accordance with minimum standards of the City of Carlsbad. In addition, gravel used in backdrain systems should be a minimum of 12 inches of Class I1 filter material or 3/4 inch clean crushed rock wrapped in filter fabric. Retaining walls should allow a minimum two foot thick compacted fill blanket of native material at the surface. Proper surface drainage should also be provided. active Earth Pressure Active earth pressure may be used for retaining wall design, provided the top of the wall is not restrained from minor deflections. An equivalent fluid pressure approach may be used to compute the horizontal pressure against the wall. Appropriate GeoSoils, Znc. COBRA-BLACKMOFUZ W.O. 1113-SD DECEMBER 6, 1989 PAGE 19 fluid unit weights are given below for specific slope gradients of the retained material. These to not include other superimposed loading conditions such as traffic, structures, seismic events or adverse geologic conditions. Surface Slope of Retained Material Horizontal to Vertical Level 5 to 1 4 to 1 2 to 1 3 to 1 Fluid Weight Equivalent P.C.F. 35 37 40 43 50 Foundations for retaining walls should be designed in accordance with the recommendations presented in the preceding Foundation Design section dependent upon the specific materials they will be founded in. For ease it might be considered to design all walls as if founded in 90% compacted fills. At-rest pressures equivalent to pressure exerted by fluid having a density of 60 pounds per cubic foot should be used in the design of a restrained retaining wall. PAVEMENT DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS During the preliminary site investigation, representative samples of on site materials were obtained and tested for "Rt1-Values. Testing was performed in accordance to the latest revisions of GeoSoils, Inc. COBRA-BLACKMORE W.O. 1113-SD DECEMBER 6, 1989 PAGE 20 the Department of Transportation, State of California, Materials & Research Test Method No. 301. The preliminary pavement sections presented below are based on the #'R"-Value data, the assumed traffic indexes and on the guidelines presented in 'the '#Flexible Pavement Structural Section Design Guide for California Cities and Counties'#. To provide the most cost effective pavement design, alternatives for each pavement section are presented below: Aggregate A. C. Traffic Traffic Base Area Index Subgrade "R"-Value Thickness (Inches) Thickness (Inches) Heavy Trucks and Entrance Areas 6.5 7 25 Traffic Lanes 5.5 17 25 Parking Stalls 4.5 17 25 5.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 3.5 3.0 3.5 3.0 11.0 (1) 9.5 (1) 9.5 (1) 11.5 (1) 10.0 (1) 7.5 (1) 8.0 (1) 6.0 (1) 4.0 (1) 6.5 (1) 4.0 (1) 5.5 (1) 5.5 (1) (1) Denotes Class I1 Aggregate Base (R=80, SE 2 50) All section changes should be properly transitioned. If adverse conditions are encountered during the preparation of subgrade materials, special construction methods may need to be employed. GeoSoils, he. COBRA-BLACKMORE W.O. 1113-SD DECEMBER 6, 1989 PAGE 21 It should be noted that higher and lower **R**-Value materials were also observed on site. Dependent upon grading procedures used these materials could be placed at finish grade and decrease or increase the pavement sections presented above. Final pavement design recommendations should be based upon **R"-Value testing performed on the materials placed at finish grade after the completion of regrading. Concrete Desian The concrete pads in front of the trash bins should be a minimum of 6.5 inches thick and be appropriately reinforced. The slabs should be underlain with 6 inches of Class I1 aggregate base material. Subarade. Aaareaate Base Compaction All aggregate base materials and subgrade materials where asphalt is to be placed on grade should be compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 95 percent of the laboratory standard. Subgrade areas underlying aggregate sections should also be compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 95 percent. POST GRADING CRITERIA Additional Gradinq This office should be notified in advance of any additional fill placement, regrading of the site, or trench backfilling after GeoSoifs, Inc. COBRA-BLACKMORE W.O. 1113-SD DECEMBER 6, 1989 PAGE 22 rough grading has been completed. This includes completion of grading in the street and parking areas, and utility trench and retaining wall backfills. +ootina Trench Excavation All footing trench excavations should be observed by a representative of this office prior to placing reinforcement. Footing trench spoil and any excess soils generated from utility trench excavations should be compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent if not removed from the site. Drainaae Positive site drainage should be maintained at all times. Drainage should not flow uncontrolled down any descending slope. Water should be directed away from foundations and not allowed to pond and/or seep into the ground. Pad drainage should be directed toward the street or other approved area. Trench Backfill Utility trench backfill should be placed to the following standards: 1. Ninety percent of the laboratory standard. 2. For the interior of the slab, it is recommended that ninety percent relative compaction be obtained. Observation, GeoSoils, Inc. COBRA-BLACKMORE W.O. 1113-SD DECEMBER 6, 1989 PAGE 23 probing, and if deemed necessary, testing may be required to verify adequate results. 3. Exterior trenches, paralleling a footing and extending below a 1: 1 plane projected from the outside bottom edge of the footing should be compacted to 90 percent of the laboratory standard. Sand backfill should not be allowed in these trench backfill areas. Density testing along with probing should be accomplished to verify the desired results. 4. All trench excavations should conform to all applicable local safety codes. PLAN RevIEw - Specific grading plans should be submitted to this office for review and comment as they become available, to minimize any misunderstandings between the plans and recommendations presented herein. In addition, foundation excavations and earthwork construction performed on the site should be observed and tested - - - by this office. If conditions are found to differ substantially from those stated, appropriate recommendations would be offered at that time. We anticipate that additional site exploration and analyses to evaluate settlement will be warranted. - - GeoSofls, Inc. COBRA-BLACKMORE W.O. 1113-SD LIMITATIONS DECEMBER 6, 1989 PAGE 24 The materials encountered on the project site and utilized in our laboratory study are believed to representative of the total area. However, soil and bedrock materials may vary in character between excavations and natural outcrops. On a project of this size, variations from the anticipated conditions and actual field conditions should be expected. Test excavations are reflective of the soil and rock materials only at the specific location explored. Site conditions may vary due to seasonal changes or other factors. Since our study is based on the site materials observed, selective laboratory testing and engineering analyses, the conclusions and recommendations are professional opinions based upon those parameters. These opinions have been derived in accordance with the current standards of practice and no warranty is expressed or implied. GeoSofls, Ine. - c COBRA-BLACKMORE W.O. 1113-SD - - The opportunity to be of service is appreci DECEMBER 6, 1989 PAGE 25 Edward P. '~ump Gchxa \/Lr S: Staff Geoloaist/ /7 C"t L-4, Princip~Geo1ogist'~- "" EPL/VS/TEM/mlc Enclosures: Appendix I, Test Pit Logs Appendix 111, Grading Guidelines Appendix 11, Laboratory Testing and Analysis Plate 1, Site Plan cc: (8) Addressee GeoSoils, Ine. APPENDIX I TEST PIT LOG GeoSoils, Znc. EXPLORATORY TEST PITS Location DeDth fft.) Material DescriDtion TP-1 0-1 1-1.5 ARTIFICIAL FILL: Grayish brown with orange staining, gravelly CLAY. Gravel content varies up to of brittle and platey, dark gray, 50 percent and is mainly comprised claystone fragments up to 10" (+) in one dimension. Clay matrix is stiff and dry to slightly moist. WEATHERED BEDROCK: Rust and olive green, weathered VOLCANIC rock, dense, hard, brittle, highly oxidized, fractured, massive, dry. Hole Backfilled Practical Refusal at 1.5 feet TP-2 0-3 38-5.5' 5.5-9.5 ARTIFICIAL FILL: Similar to TP-1 @ 0-1' with most rock fragments being 3"(f) in one dimension. Claystone fragments are occasionally fossiliferous. Clay matrix is stiff and moist. Brown, orange and gray, gravelly claystone fragments averaging 5" CLAY similar to TP-1 e0-1' with (2) in one dimension, clay matrix is stiff and moist. WEATHERED BEDROCK: Light gray, very silty fine SANDSTONE, moist, moderately dense, massive, friable. Total Depth= 9.5 Feet Hole Backfilled GeoSoils, Inc. COBRA BLACKMORE w.0. 1113-s~ EXPLORATORY TEST PITS DECEMBER 6, 1989 Location &Dth (ft.)- Material DescriDtion TP-3 0-1.5 ARTIFICIAL FILL: Multi-colored, gravelly CLAY Similar to TP-1 with claystone and metavolcanic fragments ranging .from 5-18"(+) in moderately stiff with abundant one dimension. Clay matrix is rootlets and dry to slightly moist. 1.5-11.5 Mottled medium brown and dark gray gravelly CLAY. Similar to TP-1. moist with rootlets to 3'(-+). Clay matrix is stiff and slightly @lo* Abundant blocks of dark gray claystone, (8-15") in one dimension. 11.5-15.5 BEDROCK - SANTIAGO FORMATION: Light gray to light pink gray, moderately dense, friable, silty fine SANDSTONE moist, micaceous, very faint dark mineral laminations. Total Depth= 15.5 Feet Hole Backfilled GeoSoits, Inc. COBRA BLACKWORE W.O. 1113-SD EXPIllRATORY TEST PITS DECEMBER 6, 1989 Location Depth fft. ), Material DescriDtion TP-4 0-1 1-3 3-3.5 ARTIFICIAL FILL: Medium brown and TP-1 @ 0-1'. Clay matrix is orange, gravelly CLAY. Similar to crumbly to medium stiff. Similar to TP-1 @ 0-1' CLAY matrix is slightly moist to stiff. Reddish brown fine sandy CLAY, rootlets, dry to slightly moist. loose to medium stiff, trace 3.5-4.5 BEDROCK: Orange and rust colored weathered VOLCANIC rock, very hard, fractured, oxidized dry. Practical Refusal at 4.5 Feet Hole Backfilled GeoSoils, Inc. COBRA BLACKMORE W.O. 1113-SD EXPIBRATORY TEST PITS DECEMBER 6, 1989 Location DeDth rft.1 Material Description TP-5 0-3.5 ARTIFICIAL FILL: Gray to brown to orange, gravelly CLAY. Similar to TP-1 @ 0-1' with volcanic and .claystone fragments up to 6" (?) in one dimension. Clay matrix is stiff and brittle with common relict rootlets, dry to moist. 3.5-4 4-6.5 6.5-12 Orange, similar to TP-4 @ 3 to 3.5' with occasional rock fragments. Orange and dark gray, gravelly to 8"(+) in one dimension. CLAY, common claystone fragments up Variable moisture. Brown and gray, gravelly CLAY. Similar to TP-1 @ 0-1' with claystone/volcanic rock fragments up to 12" (+) in one dimension. Clay matrix is medium stiff and slightly sticky, moist. 12-12.5 HIGHLY WEATHERED BEDROCK: Multi- colored, irregularly decomposed VOLCANIC rock, may represent zone of contact metamorphic, dense, brittle, moist. Total Depth= 12.5 Feet Hole Backfilled GeoSoils, Inc. COBRA BLACKMORE W.O. 1113-SD DECEMBER 6, 1989 EXPLORATORY TEST PITS Location DeDth (ft.1 Material Description TP-6 0-1.5 ARTIFICIAL FILL: Brown and gray, similar to TP-1 @ 0-1' with fragments averaging 2"(?) in one dimension. Clay matrix is dry with local moist pockets. 1.5-2 WEATHERED BEDROCK: Orange to tan, weathered VOLCANIC/METAVOLCANIC cleavage, highly oxidized, dry. rock, dense/brittle, platy Hole Backfilled Practical Refusal at 2 Feet TP-7 0-1.5 ARTIFICIAL FILL: Brown and orange gravelly CLAY. similar to TP-1 @O- slightly moist with localized moist 1'. CLAY matrix is stiff and pockets. 1.5-3 HIGHLY WEATAERED BEDROCK: Light gray, tan, light orange, VOLCANIC/METAVOLCANIC rock, hard- irregularly decomposed brittle and blocky to crumbly and moisture. platy, oxidized, fractured, low Hole Backfilled Practical Refusal at 3 Feet GeoSoiIs, Inc. COBRA BLACKMORE W.O. 1113-SD DECEMBER 6, 1989 EXPIORATORY TEST PITS Location DeDth fft.1 Material DescriDtion TP-8 0-1 1-3.5 ARTIFICIAL FILL: Similar to TP-7 @ 0-1.5' WEATHERED BEDROCK: Purple-orange- light gray, irregularly weathered VOLCANIC/METAVOLCANIC rock, medium hard and brittle, locally oxidized, dense to dense, locally crumbly to dry. Total Depth= 3.5 Feet Hole Backfilled TP-9 0-6 ARTIFICIAL FILL: Brown and gray, gravelly CLAY. Similar to TP-1 @ 0-1' with claystone and volcanic dimension. Clay matrix is dry to fragments averaging 5" (+) in one l'(k), moist to 6'. 6-6.5' decomposed VOLCANIC/METAVOLCANIC WEATHERED BEDROCK: Orange, rock, medium dense, brittle, platy cleavage, oxidized with local relict root systems, fractured, low moisture. Practical Refusal at 6.5 Feet Hole Backfilled GeoSoils, Inc. COBRA BLACXMORE W.O. 1113-SD EXPLORATORY TEST PITS DECEMBER 6, 1989 Location DeDth fft.2 Haterial Description TP-10 0-1 1-2 ARTIFICIAL FILL: Brown and orange, gravelly CLAY. Similar to TP-7 @ 0-1.5'. WEATRERED BEDROCK: Gray and orange, weathered VOLCANIC/METAVOLCANIC rock, dense, hard, brittle, oxidized fractures one dimension, low percentages of into fragments averaging 3"(f) in 'If ines" , dry. Practical Refusal at 2 Feet Hole Backfilled GeoSoils, Inc. APPENDIX I1 LABORATORY TESTING GeoSoils, Inc. LABORATORY TESTING Moisture-Density Soils were classified in the field laboratory, also in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System. Dry unit weights were determine using nuclear probe. Field moisture contents were determined by oven dried methods. The results of the tests are presented below. In-Place In-Place Test Pit Deuth Ift.1 Densitv (D Moisture cf 1 Relative Content % ComDaction % TP-A 2 101.7 21.6 90 TP-A 4.5 99.1 21.1 88 TP-B 2 95.0 21.1 TP-B 5 102.9 22.7 90 88 TP-B 8 100.8 22.0 90 TP-C BEDROCK TP-D 100 * 2 22.0 89 TP-E 84.7 17.1 75 TP-E 99.3 14.6 88 TP-E TP-G BEDROCK 2 97.5 17.6 87 TP-G 5 9.3 TP-G 8 21.2 82 98.2 22.0 87 Comuaction Tests To determine the moisture-density relationship of a representative sample of on-site soils, compaction tests were performed in accordance with ASTM Test Designation D-1557-78. Test results yield the following data: Location Material Descriution Densitv (D cf Moisture t%l Maximum Dry optimum TP-7 @ 2ti'-3' Yellowish gray sandy silt 121.0 GeoSoils, fnc. 13.0 COBRA-BLACKMORE W.0. 1113-SD LABORATORY TESTING 2 DECEMBER 6, 1989 TP-9 @ l+'-Z' Olive gray sandy R-value Determination Two R-value tests were performed in accordance with California Test Method No. 308. Results of the tests are presented below: clay/gravel 112.5 18.0 Soil Classification Gravelly sand Sandy Clay (volcanic rock fragment) R-value 17 25 GeoSofls, Inc. APPWDIX I11 GRADING GUIDELINES GeoSoils, Inc. Grad ing L GRADING GUIDELINES I performed to at least the minimum requirements of the governing agencies, Chapter 70 of the Uniform Building Code and the guidelines presented below: site Clearinq Trees, dense vegetation, and other deleterious materials should be removed from the site. Non-organic debris or concrete may be placed in deeper fill areas under direction of the Soil Engineer. Light, dry grasses may be thinly scattered and incorporated into the fill under direction of the Soils Engineer, provided concentrations of organics are not developed. Subdrainaae 1. Subdrainage systems should be provided in all canyon bottoms and within buttress and stabilization fills prior to placing fill. Subdrains should conform to schematic diagrams GS-1, GS-3, and GS-4, approved by the Soils Engineer. For canyon subdrains, runs less than 500 feet may use six inch pipe. Runs in excess of 500 feet should have the lower end as eight inch minimum. 2. Filter material should be Class 2 permeable filter material per California Department of Transportation Standards tested by the Soil Engineer to verify its suitability. A sample of the material should be GeoSoils, Inc. CORBA-BLACMORE W.O. 1113-SD DECEMBER 6, 1989 3. 4. 5. GRADING GUIDELINES PAGE 2 provided to the Soil Engineer by the contractor at least two working days before it is delivered to the site. The filter should be clean with a wide range of sizes. As an alternative to the Class 2 filter, the material may be a 50/50 mix of pea gravel and clean concrete sand which is well mixed, or clean gravel wrapped in a suitable filter fabric. An exact delineation of anticipated subdrain locations may be determined at 40 scale plan review stage. During grading,the Engineering Geologist should evaluate the necessity of placing additional drains. All subdrainage systems should be observed by the Engineering Geologist and Soils Engineer during construction and prior to covering with compacted fill. Consideration should be given to having subdrains located by the project surveyors. Outlets should be located and protected. Treatment of Existina Ground 1. All heavy vegetation, rubbish and other deleterious materials should be disposed of off site. GeoSofls, fnc. CORBA-BLACMORF, W.O. 1113-SD DECEMBER 6, 1989 GRADING GUIDELINES PAGE 3 2. All surficial deposits of alluvium and colluvium should be removed (see Plate GS-1) unless otherwise indicated in the text of this report. Groundwater existing in the alluvial areas may make excavation difficult. Deeper removals than indicated in the text of the report may be necessary due to saturation during winter months. 3. Subsequent to removals, the natural ground should be processed to a depth of six inches, moistened to near optimum moisture conditions and compacted to fill standards. Fill Placement 1. All site soil and bedrock may be reused for compacted fill; however, some special processing or handling may be required (see report). 2. Material used in the compacting process should be evenly spread, moisture conditioned, processed, and compacted in thin lifts not to exceed six inches in thickness to obtain a uniformly dense layer. The fill should be placed and compacted on a horizontal plane, unless otherwise found acceptable by the Soil Engineer. GeoSolls, Inc. CORBA-BLACnORE W.O. 1113-SD DECEMBER 6, 1989 GRADING GUIDELINES PAGE 4 3. If the moisture content or relative density varies from that acceptable to the Soil Engineer, the Contractor should rework the fill until it is in accordance with the following: a) Moisture content of the fill should be at or above optimum moisture. Moisture should be evenly distributed without wet and dry pockets. Pre-watering of cut or removal areas should be considered in addition to watering during fill placement, particularly in clay or dry surficial soils. b) Each six inch layer should be compacted to at least 90 percent of the maximum density in compliance with the testing method specified by the controlling governmental agency. In this case, the testing method is ASTM Test Designation D-1557-78. 4. Side-hill fills should have an equipment-width key at their toe excavated through all surficial soil and into competent material and tilted back into the hill (GS-2, GS-6). As the fill is elevated, it should be benched through surficial soil and slopewash, and into competent bedrock or other material deemed suitable by the Soil Engineer. GeoSoiIs, Inc. COFtBA-BLACMORE W.O. 1113-SD DECEMBER 6, 1989 GRADING GUIDELINES PAGE 5 5. Rock fragments less than eight inches in diameter may be utilized in the fill, provided: a) They are not placed in concentrated pockets; b) There is a sufficient percentage of fine-grained material to surround the rocks; c) The distribution of the rocks is supervised by the Soil Engineer. 6. Rocks greater than eight inches in diameter should be taken off site, or placed in accordance with the recommendations of the Soil Engineer in areas designated as suitable for rock disposal (See GS-5). 7. In clay soil large chunks or blocks are common; if in excess of eight (8) inches minimum dimension then they are considered as oversized. Sheepsfoot compactors or other suitable methods should be used to break the up blocks. 8. The Contractor should be required to obtain a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent out to the finished slope face of fill slopes. This may be achieved by either overbuilding the slope and cutting back to the compacted core, or by direct compaction of the slope face with suitable equipment. c CeoSoils, Znc. - CORBA-BLACMORJ3 W.O. 1113-SD - DECEMBER 6, 1989 GRADING GUIDELINES PAGE 6 If fill slopes are built "at grade" using direct compaction methods then the slope construction should be performed so that a constant gradient is maintained throughout construction. Soil should not be %pilled" over the slope face nor should slopes be "pushed out" to obtain grades. Compaction equipment should compact each lift along the immediate top of slope. Slopes should be back rolled rolled approximately every 4 feet vertically as the slope is built. Density tests should be taken periodically during grading on the flat surface of the fill three to five feet horizontally from the face of the slope. In addition, if a method other than over building and cutting back to the compacted core is to be employed, slope compaction testing during construction should include testing the outer six inches to three feet in the slope face to determine if the required compaction is being achieved. Finish grade testing of the slope should be performed after construction is complete. Each day the Contractor should receive a copy of the Soil Engineer's "Daily Field Engineering Report" which would indicate the results of field density tests that day. CeoSoils, Inc. c CORBA-BLACMORE W.O. 1113-SD DECEMBER 6, 1989 GRADING GUIDELINES PAGE 7 9. Fill over cut slopes should be constructed in the following - manner: a) All surficial soils and weathered rock materials should be removed at the cut-f.ill interface. b) A key at least 1 equipment width wide and tipped at least 1 foot into slope should be excavated into competent materials and observed by the soils engineer or his representative. c) The cut portion of the slope should be constructed prior to fill placement to evaluate if stabilization is necessary, the contractor should be responsible for any additional earthwork created by placing fill prior to cut excavation. 10. Transition lots (cut and fill) and lots above stabilization fills should be capped with a three foot thick compacted fill blanket. - - 11. Cut pads should be observed by the Engineering Geologist to evaluate the need for overexcavation and - - replacement with fill. This may be necessary to reduce water infiltration into highly fractured bedrock or - other permeable zones,and/or due to differing expansive - CeoSoils, Znc. CORBA-BLACMORB W.O. 1113-SD DECEMBER 6, 1989 GRADING GUIDELINES PAGE 8 potential of materials beneath a structure. The overexcavation should be at least three feet. Deeper overexcavation may be recommended in some cases. 12. Exploratory backhoe or dozer trenches still remaining after site removal should be excavated and filled with compacted fill if they can be located. Gradina Observation and Testinq 1. Observation of the fill placement should be provided by the Soil Engineer during the progress of grading. 2. In general, density tests would be made at intervals not exceeding two feet of fill height or every 1,000 cubic yards of fill placed. This criteria will vary depending on soil conditions and the size of the fill. In any event, an adequate number of field density tests should be made to evaluate if the required compaction and moisture content is generally being obtained. 3. Density tests may be made on the surface material to receive fill, as required by the Soil Engineer. 4. Cleanouts, processed ground to receive fill, key excavations,subdrains and rock disposal should be observed by the Soil Engineer prior to placing any GeoSofls, Inc. CORBA-BLACMORE W.O. 1113-SD DECEMBER 6, 1989 GRADING GUIDELINES PAGE 9 fill. It will be the Contractor’s responsibility to notify the Soil Engineer when such areas are ready for observation. 5. An Engineering Geologist should observe subdrain construction. 6. An Engineering Geologist should observe benching prior to and during placement of fill. Utility Trench Backfill Utility trench backfill should be placed to the following standards: 1. 2. 3. Ninety percent of the laboratory standard if native material is used as backfill. As an alternative, clean sand may be utilized and flooded into place. No specific relative compaction would be required; however, observation, probing, and if deemed necessary, testing may be required. Exterior trenches, paralleling a footing and extending below a 1:l plane projected from the outside bottom edge of the footing, should be compacted to 90 percent of the GeoSoils, Inc. CORBA-BLACMORFI W.O. 1113-SD GRADING GUIDELINES PAGE 10 DECEMBER 6, 1989 laboratory standard. Sand backfill, until it is similar to the inplace fill, should not be allowed in these trench backfill areas. Density testing along with probing should be accomplished to verify the desired results. GeoSoiIs, Znc. Final Grade \ . Loose Surface Deposits (See Plate GS-3) r 'Subdrain (See Plate GS-3) I TYPICAL TREATMENT OF NATURAL GROUND I Soil Mechanics Geology Foundation Engineering PLATE GS-I TOE SHOWN ON GRADING PLAN PROJECTED TOE SHOWN ON GRADING PLAN PROJECTED I No K OR FIRM ‘ION MATERIAL te : Where natural slope gradient is 51 or less, benching is not necessary unless stripping did not remove all compressible material. TYPICAL FILL OVER NATURAL SLOPE ~~~~~~ I Soil Mechanics Geoiogy Foundation Engineering ALTERNATE I SOIL - SLOPEWASH ALLUVIUM REMOVED TO BEDROCK Canyon subdrain : 6' perforated pipe with 9 cu. ft. gravel*per ft. of drain. ALTERNATE 2 * grave ' '3 6" perforated pipe with 9 cu. ft. gravel * per ft. of drain !I to conform to State of Calif. Oept. of Public Works standard specifications for Class 2 permeable material. I CANYON SUBDRAIN DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION Soil Mechanics Geology Foundation Engineering PLATE GS-3 36" THICK FILL CA FINISHED -c - " . .* 9. Buttress slope to have a bench at every 20 to 30 feet. 3. Buttress key depth varies. (see preliminary reports) :. Buttress key width varies. (see preliminary reports) 1. Backdrains and lateral drains located at elevation of every bench drain. First drain at elevation just above lower lot grade. Additional drains may be required at discretion of GeoSoils, Inc. 4"perforated pipe (or approved equivalent) placed in I cu. ft. per . linear ft. of graded , . filter material." Pipe to extend full length of ' 7 0. ,- .. . b .: \ 4" nonperforated pipe lateral to , . slope face at, "above- 100' intervals .. , - bench .c . I I ./ - J- k-l.~/\ -/.- - xGraded filter material to conform to State of Calif. Dept.. Public Works standard speclflcatlons for.Class 2 permeable matertol TYPICAL BUTTRESS SECTION GeoSofZs, Into DATE 1 ?/nq IW.0. NO 11 1 ?-qnIBY SCT Soil Mechanics Geology Foundation Engineering FILL SLOPE A n \CLEAR ZONE - Stack boulders end to end. Do not pile upon each other. Soil shall be pushed over rocks -and floodel into voids. Compact around and over each wind row. -"" ' FIRM GROUND / . ,- /, \ ' ,' ' / ./' / \/ . /' - \\\ - / ROCK DISPOSAL DETAIL GeoSoik,. Inc. bnTE 12/89 W.O. NQ 11 17-SL BY -GSL Soil Mechanics Geology Foundation Engineering REMOVE ALL TOPSOIL, COLLUVIUM AND CREEP MATERIAL FROM TRANSITION\ I FORMATION MATERIAL I Soil Mechanics Geology Foundatiin Engineering Geotechnical Engineering Engineering Geology 5741 Palmer Way' Carlsbad, California 92008 (619j 438-3155 *FAX (619) 931-0915 July 10, 1990 W.O. 1219-SD COBRA-BLACKMORE Rancho Santa Fe, California 92067 P.O. Box 424 Attention: Mr. Alan Blackmore Subject : Cobra Golf Facility, Lot 70, Carlsbad Tract 85-4 Carlsbad Research Center, Carlsbad, California Reference: "Preliminary Geotechnical Study, Lot 70, Unit 4, Carlsbad Research Center, Carlsbad", Carlsbad Research Center, Carlsbad Tract 85-4, by GeoSoils, Inc., W.O. 1113-SD, dated December 6, 1989 Dear Mr. Blackmore: This letter was prepared at the request of Mr. Gene Chapo, A.I.A. and in response to the plan correction sheet by the City of Encinitas. As indicated in the foundation plans, the proposed building foundation will be a combination of shallow footing placed on compacted fill and deep caissons supported on bedrock. There are two type of bedrock encountered at the site, sandstone and volcanic rock. Bearing capacities were recommended for each type and presented in the referenced report. It is anticipated that foundations supported by caissons founded into the underlying bedrock will experience insignificant amount of settlement, (i.e. Los Angeles Co. (618) 765-2158 * Omnge Co. (714) 647-0277 Riverside Co. (714) 677-9651 COBRA-BLACKMORE W.O. 1219-SD JULY 10, 1990 PAGE 2 less than 0.125 inch). However it is estimated that a settlement on the order of 0.50 inch could be realized for the footing founded onto the compacted fill. It is therefore, we recommend that the foundation system for the proposed building should be designed for the anticipated differential settlement of at least 0.50 between the adjacent columns. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Respectfully submitted, GeoSoils, Inc. VS/mc cc: (2) Addressee (4) Mr. Gene Chapo GeoSoils, Ine. c Geotechnical Engineering Engineering Geology 5741 Palmer Way Carlsbad, California 92008 - (619) 438-3155 *FAX (619) 931-0915 June 29, 1990 W.O. 1113-SD COBRA-BLAClWORJI Rancho Santa Fe, California 92067 P.O. Box 424 Attention: Mr. Alan J. Blackmore subject : Review of Foundation Plans Office/Facilities for Cobra Golf Inc. I1 Carlsbad Tract 85-24, Unit 4, Lot 70 Carlsbad Research Center, Carlsbad, California Reference: llPreliminary Geotechnical Study Lot 70, Carlsbad Tract 85-24, Unit 4 Carlsbad Research Center, Carlsbad, California", by GeoSoils, Inc., dated December 6, 1989 W.0 1113-SD. Gentlemen: As requested, GeoSoils, Inc. has reviewed foundation plans for the subject development, prepared by Gene Chapo Associates, Associates AIA, issued June 10, 1990. Overall, the foundation plans appear to be in conformance with recommendations presented in our referenced report. The following comments are pertinent to both design and construction. A. Sheet S-5A of the above reviewed plans state, %hallow footing design was based upon Alternative I", and l*caisson and deep foundation design was based upon Alternative Lo6 Angeles Go. (818) 785-2158 Omnge Co. (714) 847-0277 Riverside Go. (714) 677-9651 COFtRA-BLAcKnoRE W.O. 1113-SD JUNE 29, 1990 PAGE 2 111". Alternative I, as presented in the referenced preliminary report, recommends that a minimum of three feet of compacted fill material be provided below all footings. Alternative I11 recommends that specific site processing is not needed for foundations; however, a minimum of two feet of compacted fill should be provided under the slab. As a combination of the alternatives are proposed to minimize the differential across the slab, we recommend that the entire building footprint and five foot outside, be provided with a uniform thickness of compacted fill corresponding to Alternative I. B. Sheet S-3A has notes for each caisson to extend to specific elevations. Sheets S-13A and S-15A indicate that caissons should be embedded a minimum of three feet into competent volcanic rock. It is our understanding that the caisson bottom elevations indicated on Sheet S-3A are necessary for structural design and supersede the three foot embedment. The three foot embeddment criteria is most likely to effect the caisson at E-6, if any. The two caissons nearest D8 are anticipated to encounter sandstone of the Santiago Formation and may not encountered volcanic rock depending on the configuration. The difference between the maximum earth pressures allowed for each bedrock types is 2000 pounds per square foot GeoSoils, Inc. COBRA-BLAcKnORE W.O. 1113-SD JUNE 29, 1990 PAGE 3 (psf). It is not clear in detail 1 on Sheet S-13A if the different allowable pressures as been considered. The structural engineering should consider whether this would effect design. If you should have any questions regarding this review, or if we may be of further service, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Very truly yours, EPL/VS/TEM/mc cc: (1) Addressee (3) Gene Chapo Architects, Attn: Mr. Chapo GeoSoils, Inc. Geotechnical Engineering Engineering Geology 5741 Palmer Way Carlsbad, California 92008 * [619) 438-3155 *FAX [619) 931-0915 May 30, 1990 W.O. 1113-SD COBRA-BLACXMOFU3 ~ ~~~ ~~ P.O. Box 424 Rancho Santa Fe, California 92067 Attention: Mr. Alan J. Blackmore Subject : .Update Geotechnical Study ,I Carlsbad Research Center LOT 70, Carlsbad Tract 85-24, Unit 4 Carlsbad, California Reference: "Preliminary Geotechnical Study, Lot 70, Carlsbad Tract 85-24, Unit 4, Carlsbad Research Center Carlsbad, California", by GeoSoils, Inc., dated December 6, 1989, W.O. 1113-SD Gentlemen: Pursuant to a request by Mr. Kirk Welton of Construction Management Company and authorization by yourself, GeoSoils, Inc. is submitting this update report on the above subject site. This update is based upon observations of additional test pits excavated on the property. It is our understanding that these pits were excavated on May 21, 1990 by a D-8K dozer under the guidance of Mr. Welton. Our observations occurred on May 22, 1990. c Los Angeles Ca [SlS) 785-2158 Ornnge Ca (714) 647-0277 * Riverside Co. (714) 677-9651 ~- ~~~~~ ~~~ ~~ COBRA-BLACKMORE W.0.1113-SD MAY 30, 1990 PAGE 2 Consistent with observations made during our initial field work, dense and very hard volcanic/metavolcanic rock was noted intermittently at shallow depths in test pits in the eastern to southeastern portion of the lot. Fill and bedrock materials, excavated to roughly four to five (+) foot below pad grade, were observed in the remaining test pits on the site. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Review of the proposed grading plan, prepared by Sowers and Brown (undated), noted that the building will be underlain by variable ‘earth materials, as stated in our referenced report. It should be realized, however, that materials encountered during grading within the existing volcanics/metavolcanic rock may exhibit large variations in both density and composition. Since materials exhibiting such variable density/compaction are undesirable for foundations, various options may be considered for site development. Our referenced report gave three options, which are still applicable in our opinion. It appears, from discussions with Mr. Welton, that Alternative I or I1 (standard foundations) would be considered. In either case, a minimum of three feet of compacted fill materials should be provided beneath all footings. This includes continuous footings and/or isolated columns. GeoSoiIs, Inc. COBRA-BLACKMORE W.0.1113-SD MAY 30, 1990 PAGE 3 Moderate to poor quality fill materials should be produced from cuts within the volcanic/metavolcanic rock. This may include importing suitable materials for utility trenches and portions of the building pad. Recommendations previously presented regarding design of floor slab and grading guidelines still apply. If you should have any questions regarding this update, or if we may be of further service, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Very truly yours, -\> Edwar P. Lump Staff Geologist \ EPL/VS/mc cc: (4) Addressee u" Vith a Si hanet, GE 702 CeoSofls, Znc. RECEIPT NO. @% -&6 USE OF SCHOOL BUS $ nd to verify DAMAGE TO SCHOOL PROPERTY $ $ DAMAGED OR LOST BOOKS $ INSURANCE SALE OF SURPLUS $ TELEPHONE COMMISSIONS $ No building :gned by the $ rtment. TOTAL \80'.'' i INCOME^ ABATEMENT *IOH ACCOUNT N0.L ACCOUNT NO. - ACCOUNT NO. - 2 -WE3 - __ - - RECEIVED CASH 0 CHECK ~776) - " . - - - "" " - - - " kbL" @X- chool "" RECEIVED BY .. . ,, -3-6491) Project Applicant: flN:d/J- A78 - Ld Project Address: Am// ," I RESIDENTIAL: SQ. FT. of living area Number of dwelling units SQ. FT. of covered area SQ. FT. of garage area COMMERCIAL./ IND : SQ. FT. AREA Prepared By Date 14 rBlY"g0 FEE CERTIFICATION (To be completed by the School District) LApplicant has complied with fee requirement under Government Code 53080 Project is subject to an existing fee agreement Project is exempt from Government Code 53080 - Residential Comm/Indust Final Map approval and construction started before September 1, 1986. (other school fees paid) Other Fee Levied: $ based on sq. ft.@ Fee Levied: $ \(e. %@\.q%ased on ~Cy~(Ss3 sq. ft.@ 3 0. 3.C" AS-.-2926 and SB 201 fees are capped at $1.58 per square foot for residential. AB 2925 is capped at $.?6 per square foot for commercial/industrial. ... City of Carlsbad Date: 10 * 24 90 Chris Smith ENCINA WATER POLLUTION CONTROL FACILITIES 6200 Avenida Encinas Carlsbad, CA 92009 INDUSTRIAL wm PERMIT APPLICATION NO. 7 69 Enclosed is a copy of the application for an Industrial Waste Discharge Permit from the subject applicant. Your review and recommendation on this application will be appreciated prior to the issuance of a waste disposal permit. LLOYD B. HUBBS V kB.- City Engineer LBH:n Enclosure: Application No. 7(, c: Building Department Ernie Ferrer, Department of Public Works Arnie Wing, Department of Health Services 2075 Las Palrnas Drive - Carlsbad, California 92009-4859 - (619) 438-1161 APPLICATION: NEW x BUILDING P.C. NO.: 90 -5b6 (CHECK ONE) REVISE0 APPLICATION NO.: 7d9 INDUSTRIAL CLASS: 3/-/? BY: 13" DATE: ID- 24.90 SignatureG) City Repreeentative APPLICATION FOR INDUSTRIAL WASTE DISCHARGE PERM11 A. GENERAL: APPLIcANT:CO&CA GOW SITE ADORESS: IBZ +#E. t, TYPE OF BUSINESS: mle /GQw CL& Memclf Is r APPLICANT'S ADORESS: 4w-5 'Qom /%e. , Q=+w\",C&- 6 8. WASTES AND PROCESSING: (Check *here applicable) XDomeatic Waate Only 1-1 Induatrial Waste 1-1 Industrial Wasta NOT GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WASTE (Chemical and Physical Characteristics of proposed mete): - Discharged to Sener Discharged to Sener - GENERAL DESCRIPTION ff PROCESS (If Applicable): C. WASTES TO %E DISCHARGED TO SEWER: I. k WASTE: TRE ATE0 : QUANTITY: AVERAGE GPO (Check One) UNTREATED: - (Daily) MAXIMUM GPO (Gallons Per Oay) APPLICANT OR REPRESENTATIVE OF FIRM: ck&o &A (Print; OAT€ : Lo,!%@ PM-13-91 June 7, 1991 Mr. Tony Mata CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, California 92009 I Dear Tony: I want to follow up on the meeting that we had on Friday May 31, 1991 at the new Cobra building. It is my understanding that the City of Carlsbad will grant occupancy to Cobra Golf at 1812 Aston Avenue without the dust collection system installed and operating. I want to assure you that we will not operate any of the equipment that is required to be connected to the dust collection system. We may need to move properly hooked up to the system, however, we will not use the the sanding and polishing equipment into place so it can be equipment or occupy the space until it has been inspected and approved by your office. We sincerely appreciate your understanding in this matter and look forward to a good relationship with your office. I Sincerely, PAT McDOUGALL Vice President Manufacturing I cc: Alan Blackmore Gene Chapo PM/ tv L P.O. BOX 61 69 4645 NORTH AVENUE OCEANSIDE, CA 92056 (61 9) 941-9550 *1-800-BAFFLER - Landscape Architecture Urban Design Planning \ 2741 Fourth Avenue Sen Diega. California 92103 619 294-8484 /FAX 619 574-0626 VAN DYKE &A!5SOCIATES May 24,1991 #345 4 City of Carlsbad Mr. Tony Mata, City Inspector wv vv v 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009 "reject: Ccbrz Golf Dear Mr. Mata: I am writing to seek your assistance in obtaining partial occupancy of the Cobra Golf facility, Carlsbad Research Center. The specific reason for this request is that revisions to landscape and irrigation drawings have occurred in the last several months, due in part to the February/March water crisis. Although this project was permitted and well under construction, the Owners felt it appropriate to respond to the drought problems by revising the irrigation system from a standard spray system to a drip system. Also, additional plant material was added that were more drought tolerant than the original design. Although neither the City nor the water agencies required any specific revisions to projects in the "pipe line", we felt it was appropriate to respond to the pending crisis. We met with the City's Landscape Architect, Larry Black and his supervisor Erin Letsch to discuss this issue. There seemed to be general agreement that revisions to landscape and irrigation plans on projects already in construction would be accommodated by the City with the intent of not delaying construction nor occupancy. Although there was never any final written approval of such a policy, we proceeded ahead with the revisions of plans to accommodate the drought situation. Those plans were reviewed and approved by the City within the past two weeks, and landscape construction has now commenced. Mr. Tony Mata May 24,1991 Page 2 It is anticipated that landscape work will be completed within three weeks. The building portion of the project, as well as other site improvements, are almost complete. In the last week or so, the job superintendent has requested final inspection on building-related &neats such as p!xdoing, eiectrica:, etc. i-le has beeit ta!d by- the inspector that final inspection cannot occur until the landscape is complete. It would be very helpful if some accommodation could be made for the delay in revising landscape drawings and gaining approvals by providing some interim inspection for building-related items. Any corrective work on the building could be done at the same time landscape and irrigation is being completed. Any assistance you can provide in resolving this matter is greatly appreciated. If I can provide any additional information as to landscape completion dates or specific building-related inspection items, please do not hesitate in contacting me or Tom Jones, job superintendent. Sincerely, h .. w; VAN DYKE & ASSOCIATES Thomas G. Van Dyke, ASLA A California Corporation TVD;dm cc: Allen Blackmore Larry Black Tom Jones Erin Letsch CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 Las Palmas Dr., carlsbad CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 ,""""""" "" ': r with the >E 7ancv is CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 Lar Palmas Dr., CarIsbad CA 92009 (619) 4381161 . .. 02/08/91 12:59 BUILDING PERMIT Proiect No: A9000668 PCR No: PCR91012 Paae 1 of 1 Job Address: 1812 ASTON AY Permit Type:mAN CHECK REVISION Parcel No: 212-120-06-00 Valuation: 0 - Development No: Str : F1: Ste: Construction Type: NEW Occupancy Group: B2 Description: REVISIONOF FLOOR FRAMING Class Code: Applied: 01/28/91 Status: ISSUED : 2 STORY OFFICE BLDG Apr/Issue: 02/08/91 Appl/Ownr : CHAPO, GENE Validated By: CD 481-7446 535 N. HWY. 101 B Credits . 00 .00 165.00 Ext fee *** Data 165.00 FINAL APPROVAL IINSP. DATE I CLEARANCE I CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 Las Palmas Dr., CarIsbad CA 92009 (619) 4381161 (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County uhich requires a permit to CanStlYCf, alter, inprove, denoiish. or repair any LtrYCfUre. prior to its issuaxe. elso requires the applicant for such permiT to file B ~igned statement that he is licensed pursuant fo the provisions of the Contractor's License tau (Chapter 9, cmncing with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or that he is ex-f fherefrm. _re than five hundred dollars II5001). and fhe basis far fhe alleged erenpfion. Any violaflm of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a pmif subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of nof ESGIL CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) 560-1468 DATE: -T&m - 3\ - \ JURISDICTION: C7.K cn, eplv\SLd PLAN CHECK NO: Lrs Q h 5fQd-q * FILE COPY - ET: (r> . OUPS CjDESIGNER PROJECT ADDRESS: \%\x naz- QUO- 8 necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where building codes. 0 with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficien- ' The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply cies identified are resolved and checked by building department staff. 0 identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corp. until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the 0 jurisdiction to return to the applicant contact person. 0 The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: ;m Esgil staff did not advise the applicant contact person that plan check has been completed. 0 Esgil staff did advi'se applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Date c.ontacted: Telephone # - 0 REMARKS: By:' u- Enclosures: ESGIL CORPORATION don4 \- a4 OGA OAA URN ODM Date: \ - 33\-%\ Jurisdiction ca*kk&& Prepared byc A- VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE 0 Bldg. Dept. dEsgi.1 PLAN CHECK NO. & - 4fi-GUdQd‘ @’ BUILDING ADDRESS \2\% AsGm dm, APPLICANT/CONTACT /-<7\p f PHONE NO. q 2\ -114Ctw BUILDING OCCUPANCY %-rj u-2.1 -3 DESJCNER PHONE 7 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION f /5& CONTRACTOR PHONE - I ~~ VALUATION - MULTIPLIER VALUE t I I 1 I I I I I I k I I I I Air Conditionina’ I Commercial . I. . @ 1 1 Total Value I Building Permit Fee $- - Plan Check Fee S I COMMENTS; SBEET OF (?I 12/87 ,e . Y** ' - *.I BUILDING 04/18/91 11:12 Page 1 of 1 Job Address: 1812 ASTON AV Permit Type: PLAN CHECK'REVISION Parcel No: 212-120-06-00 I Valuation: 0 Construction Type: NEW Occupancy Group: B2 Class Description: REVISIONS: DELTA 3,4,5,6 I Appl/Ownr : CHAPO, GENE 535 N. HWY. 101 B SOLANA BEACH, CA 920s *** Fees Required """""""""""~ Fees : 3 Adjustments: Total Fees: Fee description Plan Check Revisi PERMIT PCR No: Project No: Development No: 195'3 04/18/91 0001 01 Str : F1: Ste: @ \\b+ C-mT Code : Applied: Status : Validated By: Apr/Issue: 481-7446 PCR91022 A9000668 02 331.00 ISSUED 03/18/91 04/18/91 CD CrryoFCARLsBAD Un5 Las Palmar Dr.. culsbad €A 92009 (619) 438-1161 Credits *** .oo .oo 331.00 Ext fee Data 331.00 PERMIT APPLICATION City of Carlsbad Building Department 2075 Las Palrnas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 16w ~8.1161 I EST. VAL PLAY CK DEFUSll VALID. 81 1. . PERMIT TYPE UNEW UTEWANT IHPROMMWT STATE LIC. x LICENSE CLASS CITY BUSINESS LIC. X CITY STATE 21p cmE DAY TELEPHOllF STATE LIC. X 7. WORKERS' COMPENSATION Yorkera' CnpensafioO Declaretion: I hereby affirm that I have a Femificafe of consent to self-inswe issued by the Oirecf~r of lnduatrial Relations, or a certificate of Yorkers' C-nsaflm lns~rawe by an achifted insurer. or an ewcf cow or duplicate thereof cerrified by the Director of the insurer thereof filed rifh the Building lnrprfion Oeparfmnf (Section 3800. Lab. C). SIGNATURE 8. OWNER-BUILDER DECLARATION DATE 0uner.Builder Oeclsraflon: 1 hereby afflrm that I em exernpf from fhe Contractor's License Law for the folla*ing reason: HWNER ~CCUTRACTOR Der PnwE APPROMO sr; DATE: Y WHITE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance I" P . .f .. 0 . i BUILDING PERMIT PCR No: PCR91022 I 04/16/91 14:33 I Project No: A9000668 Paae 1 of 1 DeveloDment No: I Job Address: Permit Type: - .~ 2- - ~- - Parcel No- 212-120-06-00 Valuation: 0 Construction Tvoe: NEW - str : P1: ste : 1916 04/16/91 0001 01 02 ~ ~- ." ~ ~ ..~ " 5 Occupancy Group: B2 Class Code: Status: ISSUED Description: ADD SHEETS E-12, E-13 Applied: 03/18/91 : TO SHOW LOCATION OF ELEC EQUIPT Apr/Issue: 04/16/91 Appl/Ownr : CHAFO, GENE 535 N.. HWY. 101 B 481-7446 Validated By: CD CI "_ .edits *** .oo .oo Ext fee Data 221.00 221.00 PERMIT APPLICATION City of Carlsbad Building Departlnent 2075 Las Palrnas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (6191 138-1161 EST. VAL PLAY CI DEPOSIT VALID. 01 1. PERMIT TYPE UXtY UlENAal IYPT(DYEWEN1 STATE LIC. X LICENSE CLASS CITY BUSINESS LIC. X INSURANCE COnPANI Cerfificafe of Exmpfim: I certify thaf in the performance of rhe Wrk for rhich this pmlt is issued, I shall not enploy any pnon in any mnwr so as f~ becone subjecf to the Yorkerr' Cnpenssfion Laws of California. POLlCI NO. EXPIRATION DATE SIGNATURE DATE 8. OWNER-BUILDER DECLARATION Owner-Builder Declaraflon: i hereby affirm rhar I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for rhe following les50n: __.' ESGIL CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR.. SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO, CA 92 I23 (619) 5601468 DATE : TIPV - \\"9\ OAPPLICANT JURISDICTION: c \% T-, 63 C.~.\\\Or;A u PLAN CHECK NO: CFg 4n SET: T SUPS PROJECT ADDRESS: \? PROJECT NAME: rdh-h ( Co\\ f.\,,b t.4-i. \a(.\reA TDESIGNER \A GGG. (iW, - .., The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply a with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficien- cies identified be\ob,'l are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corp. until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. jurisdiction to return to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the 0 necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's 0 identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected 0 The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil staff did not advise the applicant contact person that plan check has been completed. Esgil staff did advise applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted: Telephone # a REMARKS: om\, 624 n T s LldU\h hex 3k -T?\&-S -nLT -STY&% B*X 4 x,. VST c<s \\4 r - \>bh 5Y5rW \< Uh hlr u a %LpQa-Ar ? 4v?n, , , By : Sad Enclosures: hrofi~ ESGIL CORPORATION L(-q OGA UAA URN ODM PERMIT APPLICATION City of Carlsbad Building Department 2075 Las Palnas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 I6191 138-1161 ESl. VAL PLW CK DEPOSIT VALID. Br 1. PERMIT TYPE UNEU UTENAUT IMPROVEHEN1 SlAlE& ZIP COOL DAY TELEPHONE .<&- 0292 SIGNATURE - " 4. APPL CANT COMTRACTOR 0 AGENT FOR CONTRACTOR [IIOUUER NAME GO/* ADDRESS AGENT FOR OWNER CITY STATE 21 P CCOE DAY TELEPHONE 5. PROPERTY OWNER WWER OLESSEE OTEYAYT NAME ' ADDRESS ESGIL CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO. CA 92 123 (619) 5601468 DATE : MA.LL - 37-41 JURISDICTION: CK b\ Ca PLAN CHECK NO: Ch 9 0- 5&& @eJ) SET: (1 ) u V\%b&-d> * FILE COPY !-UPS +DESIGNER PROJECT ADDRESS: \%\A G'sTen Qve, "_I PROJECT NAME: Cob- club M .49L.\;r;csL) * ?<J. To E-l 4 e-2 u-d.L;%ss%l~ 0 necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where building codes. 0 with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficien- The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply cies identified are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. plans are submitted for recheck. Lbc\o3 The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to return to the applicant contact person. 0 identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected ' ' b The plans are being held at Esgil Corp. until corrected a The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Chh'PO - 36-b d. H$<(hd>hM \Ol! 5o\Qn/c BraLL, ! L*- I 4h7C B Esgil staff did not advise the applicant contact person that plan check has been completed. I Esgil staff did advise applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted: Telephone # 1 REMARKS: -provl~. my&. ?tans DZC t4\(4C~.c spvr's. c5 ud A5 3 - % 3- r "ZL LI.4 addrd I 7 fi, &KLLd 4 OI 4.x .c e."& - -5 . By: Sadr& Enclosures: L\ b nr ESGIL CORPORATION 31,q OGA OAA URN I~M Submit complete electrical plans and specifications. Submit plan showing location of all services. K-EC 2Z6-2,70,711721 Submit complete one-line diagram of service and feeders. Indicate the grounding system to be installed for building service. UEC 250 - 24,803), a I&) Indicate ampere interrupting capacities equipment. NEC 230-65/110-9. (AX) of service and subservice breakers. NEC "(4 Indicate sizes of fuses and/or circuit Indicate fuse symbols to show fault branch circuits, i.e. JJN, LCL. currents are limited to 10,000 amps on currents on branch circuits to 10,000 If fuses are not used to limit fault amps, specify method to be used. Submit plan showing location of all switc!!boards. /". Submit plan showing location of all panels. 1.1~~ IIO-IL, 2"-24, 3~~-21 Provide the required working clearances in front of panelboard(s) per KC 110- 16(a). JX Submit panel schedules. - sizes. Specify aluminum or copper conductors and type of insulation. 0. 20. Show approximate length of feeders. jd. Specify electrode conductor size and type wire. (aluminum or copper) pd Submit electrical load calculations. j?d Indicate existing main service size. n Indicate existing main service load. REVl-55 m3 ESc#&? $. Indicate new additional loads. #. Indicate wiring method, i.e. m, metal flex. Id. Indicate dimension of switchboards and control panels rated 1200 amperes or f- sho~ exit signs on the elactrical lighting plan(s). As per See. 3313 and more. Nu: 110-16(c). 3314 of the 1988 UBC, provide two sources Provide the required access and entrance of power to exit signs and exit il~umination. UX 7s-b to working space for switchboards and control panels rated 1200 amperes or more. NEC 110-16(c). 9. Provide receptacle(s) within 25' of the WAC AIC units. UMC Section 509. +- Submit plan showing location of all .. - Provide multiple switch lighting controls transformers. per CAC, Title 28, 2-5319. Indicate the grounding system to be\dEd installed for transformers. NEC 250- / Provide the required sign circuit(s) and outlet(s) pet EC 600-6(b). &SG. STEEL, COLD WL'TEZ ?l?E Provide overcurrant protection on the 0 31. To meed UD the recheck Drocess. note oq this list (or secondary side of transformers. Nu: 240- a CODY) where each 21/384-16(d). correction item has been addressed. i.e., plan sheet. soecification. etc. Be sure to enclose the wked UD list when voq submit the revised ~lans. 26(c):'NEciLEjT ELEci&'DE "- hY questions on electrical please contact the plan checker shm above, at Ergil Corporation at (619) 560-1468. lhank you. GnL'd-. -9 09/10/90 EL.ECl'RICAL WRRXIIONS , I 1 I I -I 1 I I I I- I. I I I I I 'e I Air Conditioning .. Commercial . I@ Residential . Res. or Corn. Fire SDrinklers I L I e- .I Total Value Duildinj Permit Tee 5- " Plan Check fee 5 I -4-