The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1819 ASTON AVE; ; CB982657; Permit0211 911 999 Job Address: Permit Type: Parcel No: Valuation: Occupancy Group: Project Title: City of Carlsbad Building Permit Permit No:CB982657 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 438-3101 1819 ASTON AV CBAD COM Sub Type: 2121201100 Lot #: $815,451 .OO Construction Type: B/Fl Reference #: 29,336 SF SHELL BUILDING Status: ISSUED VN Applied: 0811 8/1998 Appr/lssued: 02/19/1999 Inspect Area: Entered By: MDP Owner: FINAL APPROVAL Inspector: Date: .& Clearance: NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the “Imposition” of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as ‘feesiexactbns.” You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these feeslexactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest pmdures set fo!ih in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance wivl Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely foilow that procedure will bar any subsequent iqai action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your llght to protest the specified feeslexactbns DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer mnnection fees and WpaCtiY changes, nci planning, zoning, grading or other similar applicatbn pmssing or service fees in mnnection with this pmject NOR DOES IT APPLY to any feeslexaclhons of which you have previously been qiven a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previouslv othewise expired. CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (760) 438-1161 PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad CA 92009 (760) 438-1161 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY PLAN CHECK NO. Businssr Name (at this address] 14-r Cos 5-#3 AuE. Address (include BldgiSuite XI Le231 De'rctiption Lot No. Subdivision NamelNumber Unit No. Phase No. Total X of units Assessor's Parcel X Existing Use - Q--i-T&CT ?)s-'2+ -6 e&gcsjrstc Proposed 'Use t (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a Permit to Construct. alter. improve. demolish or repair any Structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law [Chaptar 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 Of the Business and Professions Cod4 or that he is exempt therefrom, end the basis for the alleged exem tion. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a Permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars i$50011. Name Address City StatelZip Telephone X keerL,3 Ltusr. State License X License Class city BU*l"MI8 LiC..P. I Designer Name Address City StateiZip Telephone ,, , 0 of the work for which this permit io iswed. issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Insurance Company Policy No. Expiration Om (THIS SECTION MEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS Id1001 OR LESS) CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION I Certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compsnsation Laws of California. WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compsnaatlon coverage la UnIawid. and ahdl subject an emplover to c"mina1 penalties and clvll finas up to ma hundred thowmd dollars ~$100.0001. In sddltlon to the cost of compensation, damages LIS provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code. Interest and attorney's fees. I have and will maintain a certificate of Consent to self-insure for workers' ComPenSatian as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code. for the PeiformanCe I have and will maintain workers' compensation. as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code. for the performance Of the work for which this permit is SIGNATURE DATE I hersbv affirm that I am exemm from the Contractor's License Law for the followinu reason: ~Ib 1% rnk I, 85 owner Of the property or my employees with wager as their sole compensation. will do the work and the stwCtUre is not intended or offered for sale ism. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The CmtraCtOr'S License Law does not apply to an owner Of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered far sale. If. however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose Of sslel. 3 I. as owner of the property, am exdusively ContraCting with licensed CDntraCtors to Construct the project (Sec. 7044. Business and Professions Code: The ntmctor's License Law doer not apply to an owner Of pr~pertv who builds or improves thereon. and ContraCtS for such projects with contrmtorlsl licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). 0 1. 2. I am exempt under Section I persondly plan to provide the major labor and materials for Construction of the proposed property improvement. YES UNO I fi& have not1 signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. Business and RofesDionD Code for this reason: 4. number I contractors license number]: 5. I plan to provide portions Of the work, but I have hired the follawing person to coordinate. supervise and provide the major work (include name i address i phone I will provide some of the work. but I have contracted lhirsdl the fOllawing persons to provide the work indicated (include name I address I phone number I type Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan. acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prewntion program under Sections 25505. 25533 or 25534 of the Preolsy-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? 0 YES 0 NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? Is the facility to be Constructed within 1.000 feet of the outer boundary of a School site? 0 YES 0 NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AM0 THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. 0 YES 0 NO ,, ,, . I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097lil Civil Codel. LENDERS NAME LENDERS ADDRESS .. .. ~~~~~ I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is Correct and that the information on the plans io accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building COnStrUCtion. I hereby authorize representatives of the CitV of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purpooeo. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AN0 EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN AMY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEOUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0" dssp and demolition or Construction Of 5trUCtuies over 3 stories in height. EXPIRATION Every permit issued by the Building Official under the provisions Of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if thB building or work authorized by Such permit is not commenced within 365 days from the date Of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the w of t 80 days (Section 100.4.4 Uniform Building Codel. i' 4 APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE - DATE +, - 3 W WHITE: File YELLOW Applicant PINK: Finance Dept: Building Engineering Planning CMWD St Llte I plan Check# mi # CB982657 PmjW Name: 29,336 SF SHELL BUILDING Dale 8/26/99 PermitType: COM Sub Type: Address: 1819 ASTON AV M: contact^ CRAIG phone: 8195598413 sewer Bat: CA Watertist: CA .......................................................................................................................................................... Inspected By: _. R z;ected: 6hy/fl Approved: Disapproved: - Inspected Date By: Inspected: Approved: - Disapproved: __ inspected Date By: Inspected: Approved: - Disapproved: - Comments: ........................................................................................................................................................... cltrrt- Flnal Bullding lnspectlon Dept Building Engineering Planning CMWD OYiFFirrr Ran Ch& #: mn #: CB982657 PmJect Name: 29,336 SF SHELL BUILDING Date: 8/26/69 PennltType: COM Sub Type: Address: 1819ASTON AV M: COntadPmm CRAIG phone: 6195598413 sewer Qist CA WaterCist: CA .......................................................................................................................................................... Date Inspected:% -3 Approved:L Disapproved: - Inspected Date By: Inspected: Approved: - Disapproved: ~ Inspected Date By: Inspected: Approved: - Disapproved: - Comments: ........................................................................................................................................................... CllJw- Flnal Bnlldlng lnspectlon Dept: Building -g Plannlng CMWD St Lite Fire plan check #: mn x: CB982657 Nm: 29,336 SF SHELL BUILDING Awnas: 1819ASTONAV Lol: ContactperSon: CRAIG Ftme: 6195598413 sewer Did: CA WaterDist: CA Date: 8/26/99 PennitType: COM Sub Typa: Date / b J Disapproved:- Inspected By: . Inspected: 826 9 Approved:- Inspected Date By: Inspected: Approved: ~ Disapproved: - Inspected Date By: Inspected: Approved: - Disapproved: - Comments: City of Carlsbad Inspection Request For: 8/26/99 Permit# CB982657 Inspector Assignment: PY Title: 29,336 SF SHELL BUILDING DeSCriDtiOn: Type: COM Sub Type: Job Address: 1819 ASTON AV Suite: Lot Location: APPLICANT HOLASEK JOSEPH Owner: ROYAL VILLAGE LLC Remarks: PM PLEASE - 3 PM PLEASE Phone: 6195598413 Inspector: Total Time: Requested By: CRAIG CD Description Entered By: CHRISTINE 19 Final Structural 29 Final Plumbing 39 Final Electrical 49 Final Mechanical Inspection History Date Description ~ct lnsp COmmenk 6/1O/S9 39 Final Electrical PA PY OK TO RELEASE HOUSE METER 5/12/99 17 Interior LathDrywall AP DH PROVIDE LETTER FRM ENG/ARCH 24" O.C. NAIL OK 6/9/99 39 Final Electrical NR PY 5/11/99 17 Interior Lath/Drywall co DH FRAMING a NAILING CALLS FOR 16" O.C. 5/7/99 14 FramBISleel/Boltinglding AP PY FRAME AT ELEC ROOM 8 SOFFITS 5/4/99 14 FrarnelSteellBoltinglding AP PY SEE LIST ATTACHED 5/4/99 15 Rwf/Reroof AP PY 4/23/99 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers AP RB ON DRY PACK @ COLUMNS 4/19/99 11 Ftg/Foundatim/Plers CO RB ATPOURSTRIP 3/30/99 11 Ftg/FoundaUon/Piers AP PY 18PANELS 3/16/99 12 SteeVBond Beam AP NF SLABPOUR 3/11/99 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers AP PY PERiMETER FTG GRADE BEAM (4) INT PAD FTGS 3/10/99 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers wc PY 3/10/99 21 UndergroundKJnder Flwr AP PY 3110199 22 Sewerwater Service wc PY 4/20/99 I I Ftg/Foundatlon/Piers AP PY POUR'STRIP 3/30/99 13 Shear PaneldHD's wc PY City of Cr Inspection Request Permit# CB982657 Inspector Assignment: PY Title: 29,336 SF SHELL BUILDING ” Description: Type: COM Sub Type: Job Address: 1819 ASTON AV Suite: Lot Location: APPLICANT HOLASEK JOSEPH Ownen LAGE LLC Total Time: Phone: 6195598413 inspector: Reqr ste By: CRAIG Entered By: CHRISTINE CD Description Act Comments 39 Final Electrical Inspection History Date Description ~ct lnsp Comments 5/12/99 17 Interior LathlDrywall AP DH PROVIDE LETTER FRM ENGIARCH 24’ O.C. NAIL OK 5/11/99 17 Interior LathlDrywall CO DH FRAMING 8 NAILING CALLS FOR 16’ O.C. 5/7/99 14 Frame/Steel/BoltingMlding AP PY FRAME AT ELEC ROOM 8 SOFFITS 5/4/99 14 Frame/Steel/Boltinglding AP PY SEE LIST ATTACHED 5/4/99 15 Rwf/Remof AP PY a 4/23/99 11 FtglFoundationlPiers AP RB ON DRY PACK @ COLUMNS 4/20/99 11 FtglFoundationlPiers AP PY POUR STRIP 4/19/99 11 FtglFoundationlPiers CO RB ATPOURSTRIP 3/30/99 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers AP PY ISPANELS 3/30/99 13 Shear PaneWHDs wc PY 3/16/99 12Steel/Bond Beam AP NF SLABPOUR 3/11/99 11 FtglFoundationIPiers AP PY PERIMETER FTG GRADE BEAM (4) INT PAD FTGS 3/10/S3 11 FtglFoundatimIPiers wc PY 3/10/99 21 Undergroundlunder Floor AP PY 3/10/99 22 Sewerwater Service wc PY c City of Carlsbad Inspection Request For: 5/12/99 Permit# CB982657 Inspector Assignment: PY Title: 29,336 SF SHELL BUILDING DescriDtion: Type: COM Sub Type: Job Address: 1819 ASTON AV Suite: Lot Location: 4PPLICANT : HOLASEK JOSEPH Owner: ROYAL VILLAGE LLC Remarks: PM PLEASE -AT BLDG 3 Total Time: Phone: 6195598413 Inspector: LN Requested By: CRAIG Entered By: CHRISTINE Inspection History Date Description Act lnsp Comments 5/7/99 5/4/99 5/4/99 4/23/99 4/20/99 4/19/99 3/30/99 3/30/99 3/16/99 311 1/99 31 0/99 3/10/99 3/10/99 14 FamelSteal/Boltingldlng 14 Fame/Steel/Boltingldlng 15 Roof/Reroof 11 FtgffoundationlPien 11 Ftg/Foundatlon/Piers 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 11 FtglFoundationlPiers 13 Shear PaneldHD's 12 SteeVBond Beam I1 Ftg/Foundal'on/Pien 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 21 Undergroundlunder Floor 22 SewerNater Sewice AP PY AP PY AP PY AP RB AP PY CO RB AP PY wc PY AP NF AP PY wc PY AP PY wc PY FRAME AT ELEC ROOM a SOFFITS SEE LIST ATACHED ON DRY PACK @ COLUMNS POUR STRIP AT POUR STRIP 18 PANELS SLAB POUR PERIMETER FTG GRADE BEAM (4) INT PAD FTGS .- I' . City of Carlsbad For: 5/11/99 Permit# CB982657 Title: 29,336 SF SHELL BUILDING DeSCrilItion: Type: COM Sub Type: Job Address: 1819 ASTON AV Suite: Lot Location: 4PPLICANT : HOLASEK JOSEPH Owner: ROYAL VILLAGE LLC Remarks: Total Time: Inspection Request Inspector Assignment: PY Phone: 7609186926 Inspector: Requested By: CRAIG Entered By: CHRISTINE CD Description Act Comments 17 Interior LathlDrywall Inspection History Date DesuipUon Act lnsp Comments 37/99 5/4/99 5/4/99 4/23/99 4/20/99 4/19/99 3/30/99 330199 3/16/90 3/1 I /99 3/10/99 3/10/90 3/10/99 14 FramelSteaUBoltinglding 14 FramelSteaUBolUnglding 15 RwfRemof 11 FtglFoundaUonlPiers 11 FtglFoundaUonlPiers 11 Fig/FoundaUon/Plers I I FtglFoundaUonPIers 13 Shear PaneldHD's 12 Steelmond Beam 11 FtgtFoundaUonlPiers 11 Ftg/FoundaUonlPiers 21 UndergmundNnder Flwr 22 SewerMlater Service AP PY AP PY AP PY AP RB AP PY CO RB AP PY wc PY AP NF AP PY wc PY AP PY wc PY FRAME AT ELEC ROOM 8 SOFFITS SEE LIST ATACHED ON DRY PACK @ COLUMNS POUR STRIP AT POUR STRIP 18 PANELS SLAB POUR PERIMETER FTG GRADE BEAM (4) INT PAD FTGS CITY OF CARLSBAD N om c E (760)438-3550 BUILDING DEPARTMENT, 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE 0 YES @ BUbNG INSPECT# CODEENFORCEMENTOFFICER City of Carlsbad Inspection Request For: 4/20/99 Permit# CB982657 Tile: 29,336 SF SHELL BUILDING Description: Type: COM Sub Type: Job Address: 1819 ASTON AV Suite: Lot Location: 'APPLICANT : HOLASEK JOSEPH Owner: ROYAL VILLAGE LLC Remarks: DRY PACK INSPE Total Time: Inspector Assignment: PY Phone: 7609186926 Inspector: Requested By: CRAIG Entered By: CHRISTINE CD Description - 11 FtglFoundatIonlPiers - - Inspection History Date Description Act lnsp Garnments 3/30/93 11 FtglFoundatianlPiers AP PY 18PANELS 3/30/99 13 Shear PaneldHD's wc PY 3/16/93 12Steel/Bond ham AP NF SLABPOUR 3/11/99 11 FtglFoundationlPiers AP PY PERIMETER FTG GRADE BEAM (4) INT PAD FTGS 3/10/99 11 FtglFoundationlPIen wc PY 3/10/93 21 UndergroundNnder Floor AP PY 3/10/99 22 SewerMlater Service wc PY .I . CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 2075 US PALMAS DRIVE FOR INSPECTION CALL (760) 438-3101. RE-INSPECTION FEE DUE? 0 YES FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT R /3 PHONE Q BUILOI~ INSPEOR WE ENWRCEMENTOFFICER Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc. Established 1946 FINAL REPORT FOR SPECIAL, INSPECTION AND MATERIAL TESTING DATE: August27,1999 Job No. 99-076 TO Cityofcart6ed 2075 Las WLmaS Carlhd, California 92009 WlildingDePattment SUBJECT: SATEFAWRY COMPLETION OF WORK REQUIRING SPECUL INSPECTION AND MATERJAL TESTING PERMITNO.: 982657 PROJECT ADDRESS: carlsbad Research Center Lot 65-Building #3 1819AstonAvenue carlsbad, California .. I ~underpenaltyofpejurythaftothebestofmy~l~,~e~requiringspecialinspedioRmatezialsantplingandtesting, includtng the offate fabrication of building components for the structure/s comcted under the subpa permits is in conformam with the appmved plans, the -on and observation program and other construction documents, and the applicable workmanship provisions ofthe unifom Building code. Exext~l on this 27th day ofAugust, 1999. The wotk which we provided consisted of Special Inspeaion: Rdnfaced Cmcrete, Smrtural Steel inchuling Field Welding, Non-DMrucIM an Ultrasonic Testing, High-Strength Bolting, DoweVBolt Anchorage and pull Test. A. ~uleinspectionsaviceswereprovidedbyanaplnwedmaterialtestinglaboratotyorspecialinspection~: TESTING LABORATORY OR SPECIAL INSPECTION AGENCY: TeSting Engineers - San Diego, Inc ADDRESS: RESPONSIBLE MANAGING ENGINEER OF THE TESTING LABORATORY OR SPECIAL INSPECTION AGENCY: 7895 Convoy Court, Suite 18, San Diego, CA 92 11 1 NAME(P"T0RTYPE) RDOUglaSPmvins %, vim Q, StateofCaliforniaRegiStrationNumber: C56018 Expiration Date: 12/31/00 B. Ifthe inspeaion smimwereprovidedby an independent cacifiedspecialinspector: SPECIAL INSPECTORS NAME (P"T OR TYPE): REGISTRATION NUMBER. EXPIRATION DATE: SIGNATURE: Testing Engineers - San Diego. Inc., 7895 Convoy Court, Suite18 San Diego, CA. 92111 [8581715-5800 Pax [858]715-5810 Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT MAT'L SAMPLING QTY -Soil - -Bare - -Subgrade - -Asphalt Concrete - -Concrete Cylinders - -Cone Flex Beams - -Reml. Steel - -Tendon (PT Strands) - -Mo,tafar Samples - -Grout Samples ~~ -Masonry Prisms - -Masonry Block -- -Steel -- - H.S. Bolts - Fireproofing __ PageLof - MATERIAL DESCRIPTION -Cone: Mix #!psi ~ -Cone: Mix #/psi -Cone: Mix #/psi -Rinf Rebai -Rink W.W.F. -Rinf Tendons -Grout: Mix #!psi -Mortar: Typeipsi -Units: Black Units: Block __ Steel H.S. eoits -Electrodes -Fireprwiing Metal Decking Project Name Address Ihf 43- -. i?,>.-&&- 3 n s Aid &esemtL Pi hr- 44 UJ. H TESD Project # ?q - o 7 7L General I Subcontractor Building Permit # DSA # Plan File # OSHPD # Government Contract # Other INSPECTION -concrete -Prestress Conc -Masonry -struct Steal -Fireproofing -Pile Dnving ~ NOn-DeSIwCtwe -Batch Plant -Soils Technician -Mechanical lectrical _\LsOIt PUII-OU Ep y -Rooling A., &OPS ~Waterprooflng - DSA -0SHPD - speoa1Iy INSPECTION CHECKLIST -Sizes -Slump -Air Content -Temperalure -Unit Weight -Consolidation -Electrode Storage -Torque Applied -Load (Pounds) -Thickness I / Field Representative # CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: To the best of my knowledge, all of the reported work, unless othetwisehed is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workrnanship provisions of the applicable code. INSPECTOR'S NAME AnrhM, K I dbnsd-zw CERT. NO.G' "y [fT AU.!h&sS DATE,S-- M- 7 9 F 0 rm X 0 0 3 INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc. , : Established 1946 HIGH STRENGTH BOLT CONFORMANCE TEST Date: May 10,1999 Job No: 99-076 Job Name: Address: IsP~;smori Avenue CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER-LOT 65, BLDG. 3 San Diego, California Plan No: N/A Permit: 982657 Report No: 141221 ENGINEER: R. DOUGLAS PROVINS, RCE 56018 EXPIRES 12/31/00 ~ ~ SUBJECT: On 4/30/99, one 7/8x 2-3/4" A325 bolts with an A563 grade DH nut and F436 washer, was submitted to Testing Engineers for conformance to ASTM requirements. RESULTS: All elements were submitted to Mh4A Laboratories for testing. Attached are test results as reported by h4MA Laboratories (Mh4A Work Order No. GMS-05-06-34243). All elements conform to applicable requirements of ASTM. Testing Enfinecra -Sa" Diego, Inc.. 789.5 Convoy Court. Suite18 San Diego. CA. 921 I I ~6191715-S800 Fax 16191715-5810 ~~~ -- ----= -- _-.-- --%EAqALaboratories, I nc. 15062 BOLSA CHICA * HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 714/892-1961 - FAX 7141892-8159 DC- 4 n USTOMER: i httertion: TED I<RIJF.IM TESTING ENGINEERS - SAN DIEGO 7895 CONVOY COI.IRTI STE 18 SAN OTEGO, Cy, 921 11 MMAW.O.NO.: ,;~~.-05-fifi-3/,2~3 PAGE 'I OF 3 NDTAND MATERIALS TESTING FASTENER TESTING 15062 BOLSA CHICA * HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 * 714/8921961 * FAX,714/892-8159 1 :USTOMER: TESTING ENGINEERS - SAN DIEGO 7895 CONVOY SOIJRT, STE 18 SAN DIEGO, SA 92111 Attention: TED KRUMM ~ CERTIFICATION OF TESTING MA T E Fi I A I.. il ONF ORMS TO SFE C IF IC A T I ON PAGE 2 OF ? HE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS CERTIFICATION REPRESENTS ONLY THE MATERIAL UBMllTED AND IS CERTIFIED ONLY FOR THE SAMPLES TESTED. REPRODUCTION EXCEPT IN FULL i RESERVED PENDING WRITTEN APPROVAL, ALL ANALYSES AND TESTS WERE PERFORMED IN CCORDANCE WITH MMA 0.A. MANUAL REVISION 9 DATED 9130196 AND ALL OTHER RELATED 'ROCEDURES. ALL TESTING WAS PERFORMED IN A MERCURY FREE ENVIRONMENT. CCREDITATIONS: A2LA 93-01, 93-02, 93-03 VALID TO 5/31/00. PRI 0019 VALID TO 1/31101, PRI 0092- IO. 10055 VALID TO 3/1/00 AND FAA AIR AGENCY CERTIFICATE M35R933N VALID INDEFINITELY. VALID TO 7/31/99, PRI 0031-C VALID TO 1/31/00, PRI 0013 VALID TO 1/31/01. CITY OF LOS ANGELES MlNH MAI OU- ,* , CHEMICAL MECHANICAL ~ ~~ NOT AND MATERIALS TESTING FASTENER TESTING Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc. Established 1946 HIGH STRENGTH BOLT CONFORMANCE TEST I Date: Job No: Job Name: Address: Report No: ENGINEER May 11,1999 99-076 18 19 Aston Avenue San Diego, California CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER-LOT 65, BLDG. 3 Plan No: N/A Permit: 982657 f@ 141222 R. DOUGLAS PROWS, RCE 56018 EXPIRES 12/31/00 ... .. ......... . ... .. ... ..... ......... .. . . ... ........ ..... ..... . .. . .. . - SUBJECT: On 4/30/99, one W x 2-3/4" A325 bolt with an A563 grade DH nut and F436 washer was submitted to TESD for conformance to ASTM requirements. RESULTS: All elements were submitted to MMA Laboratories for testing. Attached are test results as reported by MMA Laboratories (MMA Work Order No. GMS-05-06-34242). All elements conform to applicable requirements of ASTM. TeslingEngineers-Snn Diego. Inc.. 7895 Convoy Court. Suite18 San Diego. CA. 92111 16191715-5809 Faxf6191715-5810 15052 BOrSA CHlCA * HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 * 714/892-1961 * FAX 7141892-8159 i XJSTOMER: TESTING ENGINEERS - SAN OIEGC! 7895 CONVOY COURT, STE .I8 SAN DIEGO. C:A 92111 Attention: TED l<Rl.!b!i? CERTIFICATION OF TESTING RESPECTFULLY.SUBMITTED, CHEMICAL MECHANICAL -- RECEIVE0 MAY 1 0 1999 -=--e - - ESAqflaboratories, - .- - Inc 15962 BDtSA CHICA * HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 7141892-1961 . FAX 714/892-8159 I :USTOMER: TESTING ENGINEERS - SAN DIEGO 7895 CONVOY COURT, STE IF: SAN DIEGO. CA 92111 Attention: TED I<R?IMM CERTIFICATION OF TESTING HIPTION: 3/4" X 2 3/4" A325 EOLT W/Nt.IT R WASHER LOT NO.: 822908 TESD LAB NO. : 52007 PRD..IE:CT : CARLSE,AD RESEARCH CENTER-LOT 65. BI_O?i. 3 PEEMIT NO. : 982657 H b4 RDN E S S SPFCIFICATION: 1'k$:Ti4 A 563-!27 C;K, OH HFA'VV HEX INIIT RE 0 I.! X R E M E N T : 24-38 HRi: HARDNES!? RES!!LTS ACE. AN AVERhGE OF AT LEAST THREE REAOIN ACCORDANCE WI1'I.I ASTM F CiOG-C15!.). 'Z AMP LE RESCII.. T 1 3 n t-I R c H h 6: n N E SPEC:IFT~:.ATION: ASTivi F 436-93 REO!! I R E M f: NT : 3F:.-45 HRC HARDNESS RE'ZI!LTS ARE Ab! AVERhdGE Of^ AT LEAST THREE RII%DTNG': TE5TFD TP-1 ACC.OR~AN~:E WITH ASTM F cin6--.35!, . 5 AMP I.. E 'I b 0 t4 F'C MAT E R I k L C: 0 N F 0 R M:': T 0 5 P E C 1 FICA T IO N PAGE 2 OF 2 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED MlNH MAI QUALITY ADhlINISlHAlOR I NDTANO MATERIALS TESTING FASTENER TESTING Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page -_ 1 of INSPECTION -Concrete ___prestress conc +ry -Struct Steel -Fireproofing -Pile Driving - Non-Destructive -Batch Plant -Soils Technician -Mechanical -Electrical -Ball PUII-Out -Rooting -Waterproofing II-2 -Specialty MATL SAMPLING -Soil -Base - Subgrade -Asphalt Concrete -Concrete Cylinders -Cow Flex Beams - Reint. Steel -Tendon (PT Strands) -Mona( Samples -Grout Samples -Masonry Prisms -Masonry Block -steel -H.S. Bolts -Fireproofing __Roofing -Other QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION -Cone: Mix #/psi - -Cone: Mix Xipsi -Cone: Mix #/psi -Rinf Rebar -Rinf: W.W.F. -Rinf Tendons -Grout: Mix #/psi -Monar: Typelpsi -Units: Block -Slump -Air Content -Temperature -Unit Weight -Toque Applied -Load (Pounds) -Thickness Field Representative # with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. XfiiIAJ B hob& D w527 (P""l Cleady) CERT. NO. INSPECTOR'S NAME INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE +B hA% 49 of - Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Court, Suite 18 a NOTICE TO COMPLY Page San Diego, California 92 1 I 1 & REPORT Plan File Number TO: KfgzJ CoJ~hJCZ>& c..m J s7m cod S7flU&Z-VJ Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT PageLof - INSPECTION -concrete -Prestress conc -Masonry -SIr"ct steel -Fireproofing -Pile Driving Non-Destructive -Batch Piant -Soils Technician -Mechanical -Electrical -Bolt Pull-Out Roofing - Walerproofing - DSA -0SHPD -Specialty MAT'L SAMPLING QTY -Soil - -Base - -Subgrade - -Asphalt Concrete -Concrete Cylinders - -Cant Flex Beams - -Reinf. Steel - -Tendon (PT Strands) - -Mortar Samples - -Grout Samples - Masonry Prisms - -Masonry Block - - + -H.S. Bolts -Fireproofing - Rooting - -Other MATERIAL DESCRIPTION -Cant: Mix #/psi - -Cane: Mix #/psi -Cant: Mix #/psi -Rinf: Rebar -Rint: W.W.F. -Rinf: Tendons -Grout: Mix #/psi -Mortar: Typeipsi -Units: Block -Units: Block -Metal Decking -Electrodes - Fireprwfing -Other INSP CTION CHECKLIST -Slump -Air Content -Temperature -Unit Weight - Consolidelfon -Electrode Storage -Torque Applied -Laad (Pounds) -Thickness Field Representative # CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: To the best of my knowledge, all of the reported work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. INSPECTORS SIGNATURE Qc4-4- Form8003 DATE 4- 2 e- w Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Court, Suite 18 San Diego, California 92 1 1 1 Project: 6D REPORT 0 NOTICE TO COMPLY Page of - Address Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page 1 of -_ 44- 076 TESD Project # INSPECTION -Concrete -prestress conc Masonly St,"d Steel -Fireproofing -Pile Onving - Non-DestwcIwe -Batch Plant ___Sails Technician -Mechanical -Electrical -Bolt Pull-Out __Rooling Wat*rproof,ng DSA -0SHPD -Specialty MAT'L SAMPLING -sol1 -Base -Subgrade - Asphalt Concrete -Concrete Cylinders -Cow Flex Beams -Rein1 Steel -Tendon [PT Strands) -Mortar Samples -Grout Samples -Masonry Prisms __Masonry Block -Steel - H.S. Bolls Fireproofing ___Rooling -Other MATERIAL DESCRIPTION -Cone: Mix #/psi - -Cane: Mix #/psi -Cant: Mix #/psi -Rinf: Rebar -Rinf: W.W.F. -Rint. Tendons -Grout: Mix #/psi - Monar: Typelpsi -Units' Block -Units: Block Steel -H.S Bolls -Metal Decking -Electrodes -Fireprwfing -Other INSPECTION CHECKLIST - Plans -Specifications -Sizes -Slump -Air Content -Temperature -Unit Weight consolidation -Electrode Storage -Torque Applied -Load (Pounds) -Thickness ~cMBmueaS(bnrequ1d - - Corredionr completed - A Field Representative # CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: To the best of my knowledge, all of the reporte with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. s. D w527 INSPECTOR'S NAME T&fd B (P,,", M&L&f Clearly) CERT. NO. INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE FormXO TESTING ENGINEERS-SAN Established 1946 CUSTOMER Cwl rM &%ea, h (tqler Lot65 i31dc,.'3 \sbc\L;\ fq I- PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER ADDRESS IfJ 19 &+on JOB OR PROJECT LOCATION SURFACE CONDITION HEAT NUMBER HEAT TREATMENT 0 Before 0 ARel DIEGO, DAT'q*JR -77 "0 7 REPORT NUMBER TYPE OF MATERIAL TEMP OF MATERIAL INC. CERTIFIED REPORT OF NONDESTRUCTIVE TESTING Page of Enclosure Added 0 Ye0 0 No Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Court, Suite 18 San Diego, California 921 11 x 6D REPORT ~CE TO COMPLY Page 1 of- Job u ber 97- 076 Perm4 Plan File Number Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Court, Suite 18 San Diego, California 921 11 &LD REPORT a NOTICE TO COMPLY Page A- of- 2 Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Court, Suite 18 San Diego, California 92 1 1 1 dELD REPORT a NOTICE TO COMPLY Page of - I I Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT PageLof - General I Subcontractor KE%%d COhjS~RLJL7io~ Go/C,M. 3. s???GgL US 7#Uc77d,J Building Permit # "1-as67 DSA # Plan File # OSHPD # Government Contract # Other INSPECTION - comrete - pre5tress conc -- - StNCt Steel -Fireproofing -Pile Driving - Non-Destructive -Batch Plant -Soils Technician -Mechani~al -Electrical -Boll P"II.O"t -Rooting - Waterpnxrfing DSA 4PD -Specially MAT'L SAMPLING -Soil ~0-e -Subgrade -Asphalt Concrete -Concrete Cylinders -Cone Flex Beams -Reinl. Steel -Tendon (PT Slrandr) -Mottar Samples -Grout Samples -Masonry Prisms - Masonv Block -Steel -H.S. Bolts -Fireproofing -Other Rwfing QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION -Cone: Mix #/psi - -Cone: Mix #/psi -Cone: Mix #/psi -Rinf: Rebar -Rinf: W.W.F. -Rinf: Tendons -Grout: Mix Ulpai -Mottar: Typeipsi -Units: Block -H.S. Bolts +tal Oeckin; 70,~ -ElectrOdes -Fireproofing -Other -Slump -Air Content -Temperature -Unit Weight -Electrode Storage OWEu -Torque Applied -Load (Pounds) -Thickness - Canecweanbnreqired - -Corrections completed - with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code INSPECTOR'S NAME INSPECTORS SIGNATURE +BW FoimUOO3 DATE q-s- 99 Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 921 11 INSPECTION REPORT PageLof 1 - Address 1819 Anzw Awe. - DRD CA. General I Subcontractor K&TOf..l Building Permit # Plan File # OSHPD # %- 3z77 ,SA# Government Contract # Other /$q = 6/tca / -Pile Driving - Non.Oestruclive -Bafch Plant -Soils Technician -Mechanical __Electrical -Boil P"II-Ou1 -Roofing -Waterproofing - OSA -0SHPD -Specialty MAT'L SAMPLING QTY -Soil -Base -Subgrade -Asphalt Concrete -Concrete Cylinders -Cone Flax Beam - Reinf. Steel -Tendon (PT Strands) - Mortar Samples -Grout Samples -Masonry Prisms - Masonly Blmk -steel -H.S. Bolts -Fireproofing - Roofing -Ofher MATERIAL DESCRIPTION -Cone: Mix Xlpsi - -Cone: Mix #/psi -flinl: W.W.F. -flint: Tendons -Grouf: Mix Xlpsi -Mortar: Typelpsi -Units: Block nits: Block 2 Steel 43fL -H.S. Bolts Metal Decking Elemodes I 'T; 8 Plans -Slump -Unit Weight __Consolidation -Electrode Storage , -Torque Applied -Load (Pounds) J-ThEy ?> t?&L 7- L- -caremvsaoon~red - -Corrections mmpieted - A Field Representative # CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: To the best of my knowledge, all of the reported work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. so CI'y 334 INSPECTORS NAME CERT. NO. FormXOO3 INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE DATE 3-30-99 Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT PageLof - Project Name A&f9&2 /@9 4s /dd AI/ c &kzS/?nlb a?. /ZebC arc4 c pl/r. L~AS 5 TESD Project # 97 - 076 Address General / Subcontractor &&Jd Building Permit # w-32 7 7 DSA # Plan File # - OSHPD # - / Government Contract # Other 7 Prestress Conc -Masonry - Stwct Steel -Fireproofing -Pile Driving - NM1-DBStrUctivB -Batch Plant -Soiln Technician -Mechanical -Electrical -Bolt Pull-out -Rooting - Waterpmfing OSA -0SHPD - Specialty MAT'L SAMPLING -Sail -Base -Subgrade -Asphalt Concrete -Concrete Cylinders -Cmc Flex Beams -Reinl. Steel -Tendon (PT Strands) - ~onar samples -Grout samples -Masonry Prisms -Masonry Blwk -Steel -H.S. BO116 - Fireproofing Roofing -Other MATERIAL DESCRIPTION -Cone: Mix *psi - -Cane: Mix Wpsi onc: Mix #/psi =in1 Rebar Hf;/d#f -Rim W.W.F. -Rint: Tendons -Groul: Mix #/psi -Martat: Typelpsi -Units: Black -Units: Black -Steel -H.S. Bolts -Metal Deckmg -Electrodes -Fireproofing -Other INSPFTION CHECKLIST -Sizes -Slump -Air Content -Temperature -Unit Weight -Consolidation -Electrode Storage -Torque Applied -Load (Pounds) -Thickness A Field Representative # CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: To the best of my knowledge, all of the reported work, unless othelwise stkiE8$ in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. . .-. Ah2W-a- fnc//L/ 5d . CERT. NO. ." dz zd-PY8 (P""1 Clearly) INSPECTOR'S NAME .- FormXW3 INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE /? DATE 3 -30 -9 Y Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA92111 INSPECTION REPORT . . Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page 1 of -- Building Permit # qf- 32 77 DSA# --- OSHPD# Other - Plan File # Government Contract # c - -concrete INSFON - PreslleO9 conc -Masonry - struct steel -Fireproofing -Pile Driving - NOI1-DestrwIive -Batch Plant -Soils Technician Mechanical - Eleclrical -Bolt PUII-OUI -Roofing -Waterproofing -DSA -0SHPO - Specielty MAT'L SAMPLING QTY -Soil -Base -Subgrade -Concrete Cylinders -Cone Flex Beams -Reinf. Steel -Tendon (PT Strands) -Mortar Samples - Gmut Samples -Masonry Ptisms - Masonry Blmk -steel - H.S. Bok -Fireproo(ng - Roofing -Other -phan concrete MATERIAL DESCRIPTION J 35Y yNd -Cone: Mix #/psi /-., -Cone: Mix #/psi onc: Mix #/psi zinf: Rebar 6 O~/h/%L -Rinf: W.W.F. -Rinf: Tendons -Grout: Mix #/psi -Mortar: Type/psi -Units: Block -Units: Block Steel -H.S. Bolts -Metal Decking -Electrodes - Fireprwfing -Other - rconlent -Temperature / -Eiectrode Storage -Torque Applied -Load (Pounds) -Thickness ac2WlmqAlsd ~ Field Representative # CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: To the best ,of my knowledge, all of the reported work, unless othenvise statedHconformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code ,- d z 20 -38 CERT. NO. /6 INSPECTOR'S NAME mlt asany] INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE w Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc. 7895 CONVOY CT., SUITE 18 SAN DIEGO, CA92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page Lof __ Project Name pc f &A iZecrc\rcL Ch4.e c Address /EIC AL r? AVL TESD Project # SC; -07b General I Subcontractor Building Permit DSA # Plan File # OSHPD # Government Contract # Other INSPECTION & Concrete - Prestress Conc - Masonry - SINCI Steel - Firepmollng - Pile Driving - Batch Pian1 - Mechanical - Electrical - Bolt Pull-Out - Roofing - Waterproofing DSA - OSHPD A Specialty> Au~"\p - NOn-DESINCliVE - Soils Technician MAT'L SAMPLING QTY - soil - - Base - __ Subgrade - - Asphalt Concrete ~ - Concrete Cylinders - - Conc Flex Beams - - Reinl. Steel - ~ Tendon(PTStrands) - - Mortar Samples - - Qrout Samples - - Masonry Prisms - Masonry Block - - Steel - - H.S. Bolts - - Firepmfing - - Roofing - ~ Ofher MATERIAL DESCRIPTION - Conc.: Mix #/psi - Conc.: Mix #/psi - Conc.: MIX #/psi - Rinf.: Rebar - Rinf.: W.W.F. - Rinf.: Tendons - Gmut: Mix #/psi - Monar: Typdpsi - Units: Block - Unils: Block - H.S. Bolts - Metal Dacking - Electrodes - Fireprooling Slael - Other INSPECTION CHECKLIST - Plans L Specifications __ Sizes - Slump - Air Conlent - Unit Weight - Consolidation ~ Temperature - Electrode Storage - - Toque Applied - Load (Pounds) - Thickness - COnKbW&WlW- - Corrections ~~mpleled - Field Representative CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: To the best of my knowledge, all of the reported with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. d, is in conformance .- I \Gra e IY17) CERT. NO. 7 I VI f: iP,I"t Clearhl) INSPECTORS NAME L Jf%u-- \&If??. DATE .----- INSPECTORS SIGNATURE - Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc. 7895 CONVOY CT., SUITE 18 SAN DIEGO, CA92111 INS P ECTl 0 N RE PORT PageLof __ General /Subcontractor er A niAr DSA # Building Permit # 98 * 2 Plan File # OSHPD # Government Contract # Other INSPECTION - Prestress Conc - Masonry - SINCI Steel - Fireproofing - Pile Driving - Non-Destructive - satch Plant - Soils Technician - Mechanical - Eleclrical - son Pull-out - Roofing - Waterproofing - DSA - OSHPD - Specially - s Concrete MAT'L SAMPLING QTY - soil - sase - - Asphalt Concrete - ~ Concrete Cylinders - Conc Flex seams - - Reinf. Steel - - Tendon (PTStrands) - - Mortar Samples - __ Grout Samples - - Masonry Prlsms - - Masonry Block - - Steel - H.S. Bolts - Flrepmoling - Other - - Subgrade - - - - - RWfing - MATERIAL DESCRIPTION WConc.: Mix #/psi __ Conc.: MIX #/psi - Conc.: MIX Wpsi - Rinl.: W.W.F. - Rinl.: Tendons - Grout: Mix #/psi - Mortar: Typelpsi - Units: Block - Units: Block - Steel - H.S. Boils - Metal Decking - EIeclmdes - Firepmofing - Other - Rinf.: Rebar A6 f <- INSPECTION CHECKLIST - Plans - Specifications __ sizes - Slump - Aircontent - Temperature - Unit Weight - ConsotidatioXKJF- - Eienmde Storage - - Toque Applied - Load (Pounds) __ Thlckness .t */ .. - Cm&e xbn wind - - Correctbns mwieled - ed, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. - INSPECTORS NAME n\/au\*, ?ace c ,no CERT. NO. 5 I+/ R (Print CIetrlyJ r7<>m- lfaAl?A* DATE /*- INSPECTORS SIGNATURE (61 9)-71 55800 AWTIC CITY'. MAV ' WUNW ' TESTING ENGINEERS SAN DIEGO 519)715~10 8WDIEGO.FT LAUDERDNE REPORT OF COMPRESSION TEST PROJECT CARLSBADRESEARCHCENTER PROJECT NO. 99-076 PROJECT ADDRESS CONTRACTOR JETT &JONES, LLC ARCHITECT/ ENGINEER BLDG. PERMIT NO. 982657 PLAN FILE NO. N/A 181 7 ASTON AVE CARLSBAD AZED STRUCTURAL ENGINEEWNOGLE ONUFER &ASSOCIATES SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF CONCRETE 0 MORTAR 0 GROUT HS GROUT 0 PRISMSO OTHER (DAYS) 7 2a 28 H PLACEMENT DATE 3/31/99 DATE RECEIVED IN LAB 4/2/99 SUPPLIER SUPERIOR MIX DESIGN PSI 3000 MIX NUMBER 354P MIX DESCRIPTION 1" ROCK WI PO22 TYPE OF CEMENT II TICKET NO. 324437 ADMIXTURE NIA SLUMP (IN.) 5 I' CONC. TEMP.(,~F).-. I. I . LOCATION OF PLACEMENT MIXING TIME (MIN) 60 ~. AIR CONTENT(%)^ NIA 70 .. ~~ 54 ~~ .. . , :> AlR75MP.p.- . . : . . .- . . . . . . . . ..:.. , , .. . !' DESIGN STRENGTH (f 'c) PSI 3000 @ 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY C. GRIFFIN PANEL #14 STRENGTH (psi) LAB NO. DATE TESTED (inches) (sq. inches) (IW 19336 4/7/99 6x1 2 28.27 97,500 3450 19337 4/28/99 6x12 28.27 137,000 4850 19338 412a199 6x1 2 28.27 131,000 4630 19339 5/76/99 DISC ~ LABORATORY DATA I AGE I I I DIMENSIONS I TEST AREA I MAXIMUM LOAD I COMPRESSIVE I _. - - I I I I 1 ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM TEST METHODS. *ACTUAL MEASURED AREA. .. ~. . . .. .. .. ~. . . ~~ .. REMARKS:, TW0,28 DAY 'TESTS COMPLY WITH PROJECT, SPECIFICATIONS. .. . . . . ... . . .. . . . . ~.~ ~ ~~ ~ ~. . . . , . , . . . . .. . .I . CHECKED BY: REVIEWED BY: R. DOUGLAS PROVINS, RCE 56018 DATE: DATE: (61 9)-7,55800 ATLANTCCITY*RWAY .ORULIW* (619) 7j~10 JWDIEGO'Fl UUDERWE TESTING ENGINEERS SAN DIEGO REPORT OF COMPRESSION TEST PROJECT CARLSBADRESEARCHCENTER PROJECT NO. 99-076 PROJECT ADDRESS CONTRACTOR JETT & JONES, LLC ARCHITECT1 ENGINEER BLDG. PERMIT NO. 982657 PLAN FILE NO. N/A 1817 ASTON AVE CARLSBAD AZED STRUCTURAL ENGINEEWNOGLE ONUFER 8 ASSOCIATES SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF CONCRETE 0 MORTAR 0 GROUT 0 HS GROUT 0 PRISMSO OTHER PLACEMENT DATE 311 1/99 DATE RECEIVED IN LAB 3/16/99 SUPPLIER SUPERIOR MIX DESIGN PSI 3000 MIX NUMBER 354P MIX DESCRIPTION 5 112" SACK TYPE OF CEMENT II TICKET NO. 323920 ADMIXTURE POZZ SLUMP (IN.) 3 112" MIXING TIME (MIN) 46 AIR CONTENT(%) NIA CONC. TEMP.( OF) N/A AIR TEMP.(OF) N/A DESIGN STRENGTH (f 'J PSI 3000 @ 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY G. TARANTINO LOCATION OF PLACEMENT PR~N~ETERF~OTING GRADE BEAMS INTER PIERS AND GRADE BEAM SHEAR LABORATORY DATA LAB NO. 18605 18606 18607 I AGE DIMENSIONS TEST AREA MAXIMUM LOAD COMPRESSIVE DATE TESTED (inches) (sq. inches) (IW STRENGTH (psi) 311 8/99 6x12 28.27 97,000 3430 4/8/99 6x12 28.27 141,500 5010 4/8/99 6x1 2 28.27 143,500 5080 (DAYS) E AL 18608 I 5/6/99 I I I I DISC I SAMPLING AND TESTING PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM TEST METHODS, 'ACTUAL MEASURED AREA. REMARKS: TWO 28 DAY TESTS COMPLY WITH PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. 0 CHECKED BY: REVIEWED BY R. DOUGLAS PROVINS, RCE 56018 DATE: 415 b4 DATE: (6, 9)-,, 55800 ATMIC CITI’RIWWAV .mUNW. TESTING ENGINEERS SAN DIEGO FAX (619) 7155810 S*NDIEW*FT UUDEROILE REPORT OF COMPRESSION TEST PROJECT CARLSBADRESEARCHCENTER PROJECT NO. 99-076 PROJECT ADDRESS CONTRACTOR JETT & JONES, LLC ARCHITECT/ ENGINEER BLDG. PERMIT NO. 982657 PLANFILENO. . N/A 1817 ASTON AVE CARLSBAD AZED STRUCTURAL ENGINEERINOGLE ONUFER & ASSOCIATES SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF CONCRETE 0 MORTAR [I] GROUT 0 HS GROUT 0 PRISMSO OTHER AGE (DAYS) 7 PLACEMENT DATE 3/31/99 DATE RECEIVED IN LAB 4/2/99 SUPPLIER SUPERIOR MIX DESIGN PSI 3000 MIX NUMBER 354P MIX DESCRIPTION 5.4 SK W/ POZZ TYPE OF CEMENT II TICKET NO. 324466 ADMIXTURE N/A SLUMP (IN.) 3 112’ MIXING TIME (MIN) 40 AIR CONTENT(%) N/A CONC. TEMP.( OF) 68 AIR TEMP.(OF) 60 DESIGN STRENGTH (f ‘3 PSI 3000 @ 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY G. TARANTINO LOCATION OF PLACEMENT PANEL #5- DIMENSIONS TEST AREA MAXIMUM LOAD COMPRESSIVE LAB NO. DATE TESTED (inches) (sq. inches) (IW STRENGTH (psi) 19328 4/7/99 6x12 28.27 inR nnn 3820 LABORATORY DATA I 28 I 19329 I 4/28/99 I 6x12 I 28.27 I 148,000 I 5240 I I 28 1 19330 1 4/28/99 I 6x12 I 28.27 I 149,500 1 5290 I I H I 19331 I 5/26/99 1 I I I DISC I ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM TEST METHODS. ‘ACTUAL MEASURED AREA. REMARKS: TWO 28 DAY TESTS COMPLY WITH PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. w CHECKED BY: REVIEWED BY: R. DOUGLAS PROVINS. RCE 56018 DATE: DATE: 4/--/w (61 9)-,155800 ATUNTIC CIlY*R*HW*I *ORUNW* TESTING ENGINEERS SAN DIEGO FAX 1619) 7155810 SINDIEU)*F%UUDERDNE REPORT OF COMPRESSION TEST (DAYS) 7 28 28 H PROJECT CARLSBADRESEARCHCENTER PROJECT NO. 99-076 PROJECT ADDRESS CONTRACTOR JElT & JONES, LLC ARCHITECT/ ENGINEER BLDG. PERMIT NO. 982657 PLAN FILE NO. N/A 181 7 ASTON AVE CARLSBAD AZED STRUCTURAL ENGINEEWNOGLE ONUFER & ASSOCIATES SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF CONCRETE 0 MORTAR 0 GROUT 0 HS GROUT PRISMSO OTHER STRENGTH (psi) LAB NO. DATE TESTED (inches) (sq. inches) (IW 18605 3/18/99 6x1 2 28.27 97,000 3430 18606 4/8/99 6x1 2 28.27 141,500 5010 18607 4/8/99 6x1 2 28.27 143,500 5080 18608 5/6/99 DISC PLACEMENT DATE 311 1/99 DATE RECEIVED IN LAB 311 6/99 SUPPLIER SUPERIOR MIX DESIGN PSI 3000 MIX NUMBER 354P MIX DESCRIPTION 5 112" SACK TYPE OF CEMENT II TICKET NO. 323920 ADMIXTURE POZZ SLUMP (IN.) 3 112 MIXING TIME (MIN) 46 AIR CONTENT(%) N/A CONC. TEMP.( OF) N/A AIR TEMPfF) N/A DESIGN STRENGTH (f 'J PSI 3000 @ 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY G. TARANTINO LOCATION OF PLACEMENT PRIMETEFOOTING GRADE BEAMS INTER PIERS AND GRADE BEAM SHEAR LABORATORY DATA I DIMENSIONS I TEST AREA I MAXIMUM LOAD I COMPRESSIVE I ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM TEST METHODS 'ACTUAL MEASURED AREA REMARKS: TWO 28 DAY TESTS COMPLY WITH PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. eD9 CHECKED BY, REVIEWED BY: R. DOUGLAS PROVINS, RCE 56018 DATE: DATE: 4% h., AS 5 o c I AT c 5 A KC H IT r Cf 'i May 18,1999 Mr. Craig Connelly Keet00 coMtrw(ion 334hchaorDrive%110 $an Marcos. CA 92069 Rr. Lot65 Mh. Framing Cbrilkatom Craig, This Imn is io confirin the adequacy of miscellaneous fnming items, as install& on dx jobsite: 1. Rooms The telephone mom waUs haw ken framed with 5/8" Type "X" Cyp. Bd on each side of 3 518" 20 GAGl studs at 24" OC. The &phone room ceilinpr have been him& with 518" Typc "X Gyp.Bd. on one side of 6" 20 GAG1 ads PI 24" OC. This framing is acreptablc. 2. -how Wind- The vncical framing for the window so& is 6" 20GAGI studs at 16" OC. Thc horirmral fiaming for thc window sofits is 6" 20 GAGl studs at 24" OC witb 518" Typ. "X" Gyp. Bd. on one side only. This fnming is sc~eptabl~. ShouM you have any comments or quosrioas pkue mnwt me at (619) 297-8066, Thank you, NOM, [nc. Joseph ffolapfik International Structural Products Corp. April 5, 1999 Craig Connelly Keeton Construction 334 Rancheros Dr. Suite 110 San Marcos, CA. 92069 Ref. 99-01 44 Carlsbad Research Lot 65 Carlsbad. CA Dear Craig: I have read t..e letters that you faxe- .o me regar_--ig the number of TT braces require for the above-mentioned project. We agree that only one TT brace is required when the system has no uplift forces. A review of the bill of materials show that no uplift is present, therefore we recommend that only one TT brace is used. I like to remind you that back on 03/19/99, 1 responded to some comments the engineer had on both our drawings and calculations. If you take a look at item 1 on the drawing comments, you will see that he requested 2 TT braces. We have done this change. Please confirm that he will be satisfied with just one. Please call if you have any questions regarding this job. Sincerely w Salvador Engineering Engineering Consultant F-14 Basrett Ctr. 1328 - 6001 Gateway West - El Paro, Texas 79925 Phone (915) 532-4414 - Fax (915) 532-4728 P. 05 JAN-21-99 THU 08:03 CITY OF CARLSBAD COMM DE FAX NO. 4380894 City of Carlsbad GERTWATF 0 F COMPLIANCE PAYMENT QF S CHOO L FEES OR OT HER WIGAILON Thls form must be completed by the CiIy and lhe appropriate school districts and returned to the Clty prior lo issuing a building permit. The City will not issue any bullding permlt without a completed school fee form, Project Name. Building Permit Plan Check Number: 30- 2657 Project Address: 1817 &&tu, &e A.P.N. : %It. \to- \\- 00 , Project Applicant (Owner'@') Name(s) Project Description: 2 7, 33 €an she\\ Residential: Number of New Dwel lina Units Square Feet of Living Area in New Dwelling Square Feet of Living Area in SDlJ _- -~ Second Dwelling unit: - Res. Additions: Net Square Feet New Area - --- Cornerc./ Ind.: Square Feet Floor Area 7-q , 37 6 nil City Certification: Date: .. ~ICTS WITHIN -OF CAW Carlsbad Unified School Dlstria 801 Pine Ave. CarlsbadCA 92009 (434-0661) Encinitas Unlon School District Encinitas. CA 92024 (9444300) Certification of Applicant /Owners. The per60n executing this declaration COwnef) certifies under penally of perjury that (1) the information pmvided Is correct and true to the best of the Owner's knowledge and that Ihe Owner will file an amended cenfflcatlon of payment and pay the additional fee if Owner requests an lnmase in the number of dwelling units or square footage after the building permit is issued or If the initlai determination of unlts or square footage is found to be incorrect. and that (2) the Owner is the owner1 deVelOpSr of We above described prajecqs). or that the person executing this declaration Is auhQrized to sign on behalf of the Owner. San Marcos Unified school Dlstrid 215 Mata Way San Marcos, CA 02069 (7352200) Ssn Diqub Union High School District Endnitas, CA 92024 (7538491) 101 South Ranch Santa Fe Rd 710 EneinHas Blvd. -- @ r075 Lao Palmas Dr. - Carlsbad. CA 32009-1576 (760) 438-1181 * FAX (760) 438-0894 JAN-21-99 THU 08:03 CITY OF CARLSBAD COMM DE FAX NO. 4380894 Gov. Code Gov. Code Government 53080/65995 65970 Code 5331 1 (AB 181) (SB 201) (Mello - Roos) P, 06 Prior Exlsting Exempt from Mitigation Agreement fee Note: requirements dl /e&( Amount Collected (b s./owQ. 10 .. . :. Total amount or (new) floor area within the building Fee Amount per Square Foot 39, ,330 ~ -Or If subject to Prior Existing Mitigation Agreement .. For Detached Residential Dwelling Units or Attached Dwelling Units > 1600 Square Feet Total Number of Dwelling Units Amount per Dwelling Unit .. Amouril Collected - -and/or- For Atlached and Detached Dwelling Units c 160U square feet/ per dwelling (If applicable) Total Number of Dwelling Units Amount per Dwelling Unit Amount Collected ., . ,. SCHOOL DISTRICT This is lo certlfy that the applicant listed on page 1 has paid all amounts or completed other appllcable school mitigation determined by the information presented sbove and due to the School District. The City may issue bulldlng permits for this project. .. SIGNATURE OF SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICIAL DATE TITLE PHONE NUMBER The Carlsbad Unified School District has elected lo Imposed the fees andlor anmunb hereln upon a finding that those facilities descrlbed in the School lmpacf Mifigation Fee JuMation Siudy for Catisbad Unified School Dlsfricl, prepared by David Taussig &Associates for the DisMct Section 88020 afthe Government Code enacted as Assembly Bill 3081, mt forh as Chapter 549, Statutes of the State of Callfomla. requires that all sehool districts, Including the Catisbad Unified and the Encinitas Union School Distficts. provide a written notice to the project applican! at the time of payment of the school fees, miligation paymenls. Or Other exaction. This notice Is to advise We project applicant that the protest period regard to such amounts or the velidity thereof in accordance wilh Section 66020 of lho Government Code and other amlicable law. ~ ! .. commences with such payment or performance of any other requirement as desuibed in Section 66020 of !he Government Cads Addhonally. this nolice advises lhar the protest thereof must occur within 80 calendar days thereafter. - Fa Corporation In partners& with Gowernmcnt for Buifding Safety DATE: NOV. 19, 1998 JURISDICTION: CARLSBAD 0 PLANREVIEWER PLAN CHECK NO.: 98-2657 SET I11 PROJECT ADDRESS: 1819 ASTON AVE. 0 FILE PROJECT NAME: CARLSBAD BUSINESS PARK The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply 0 The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction’s building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list 0 The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil The applicant‘s copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant 0 The applicant’s copy of the check list has been sent to: with the jurisdiction’s building codes. and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. contact person. Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. 0 Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: 1 Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS: By: AliSadre Enclosures: 0 GA 0 CM 0 EJ 0 PC LOG Esgil Corporation trnsrnU.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + SanDiego, California 92123 + (619) 560-1468 Fax (619) 560-1576 */ c I EsGil Corporation Zn !Partnerskip with ~overnmrnt for BuiMing Safety DATE: NOV. 9,1998 JURISDICTION: CARLSBAD PLAN CHECK NO.: 98-2657 0 APPLICANT 0 PIAN REVIEWER 0 FILE E!!!!W SET I1 PROJECT ADDRESS: 1819 ASTON AVE. PROJECT NAME: CARLSBAD BUSINESS PARK 0 The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply 0 The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. 0 The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identied on the enclosed check list The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil 0 The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: with the jurisdiction's building codes. and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. contact person. Joseph Holasek c/o Nogle Onufer AIA 2398 San Diego Ave., San Diego, CA 921 10 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. 0 Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: 1 Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax InPerson REMARKS: Please see attached for remaining items from previous list. By: AliSadre Enclosures: Esgil Corporation 0 GA 0 CM 0 EJ 0 PC 11/12 tmsmU.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (619) 560-1468 + Fax (619) 560-IS76 CARJSBAD 98-2657 NOV. 9,1998 1. 6. 8. 9. IO. 12. 15. 19. 20. 0 0 Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit three revisedl signed sets of prints, to: The jurisdiction's building department. Please provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soil report are properly incorporated into the plans. Specify diameter and embedment of power driven pins for non-bearing partitions on 26lA8. Please submit the name and information for the inspection agency to the building official for approval prior to issuance of the building permit. Section 106.3.5. Please provide structural details & references for the trash enclosure per 5/A-2. Please delete details such as 13/S5; 4, 10, 13, 14 & 15/S6 on plans; there is no step in this building. Please submit diaphragm deflection calculation for longitudinal direction showing allowable drift limits are not exceeded. Section 1628.8.2. Please specify where details I 1 & 19/S6 are referenced on plans. Section 1921.6.12 requires 6" O.C. max tie spacing as opposed to 16" O.C. Please revise details 17 & 18/S6 accordingly. Please do not resubmit plans without this correction. To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, Le., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208. San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 619/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Ali Sadre at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. EsGil Corporation DATE: AUG 31,1998 JURISDICTION: CARLSBAD PLAN CHECK NO.: 98-2657 PROJECT ADDRESS: 1819 ASTON AVE. SET I 0 FILE PROJECT NAME: CAFUSBAD BUSINESS PARK 0 The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. 0 The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. 0 The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. 0 The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Joseph Holasek c/o Nogle Onufer AIA 2398 San Diego Ave., San Diego, CA 921 10 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. 0 Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: 1 Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person 0 REMARKS: By: AliSadre Enclosures: Esgil Corporation 0 GA 0 CM 0 EJ 0 PC at20 msmtt.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + SanDiego, California 92123 + (619) 560-1468 + Fax (619) 560-1576 CARLSBAD 98-2657 AUG 31,1998 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST COMMERCIAL OCCUPANCY: B/F-1 USE: OFFICE/ MANUF. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN/SPRK. ACTUAL AREA: 29,336 ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA: 8%~3(spr.)x2(yrd.) STORIES: ONE HEIGHT: 25 SPRINKLERS?: Y OCCUPANT LOAD: SHELL I REMARKS: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: 8/18 ESGIL CORPORATION: 8/20 DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW PLAN REVIEWER: Ali Sadre FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Code sections cited are based on the 1994 UBC. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1994 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed UD the recheck process. please note on this list (or a cow) where each correction item has been addressed, Le., plan sheet number, specification section. etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. CARJSBAD 98-2657 AUG 31,1998 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. IO. 11. 12. 13. 14. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit three new sets of prints, to: The jurisdiction’s building department. Provide a statement on the Title Sheet of the plans that this project shall comply with Title 24 and 1994 UBC. UMC and UPC and 1993 NEC. Please note on the cover sheet of plans that buildings I & II are not included .in this permit and building 111 is. Please justify the allowable areas on cover sheet of plans, Le., 8,000 x 3 (Sprk.) x 1.5 (60’-Yards on two sides). Specify on the structural specifications sheet the soil classification and the soils expansion index. Section 1804.3. Please provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soil report are properly incorporated into the plans. Show typical interior partition details with stud size, spacing, metal gage, approval number, span as well as ceiling joists information and connection details for the electrical room. Specify embedment, size, ICBO number and manufacturer of power driven pins for non-bearing partitions. Show end distance and spacing. Section 1701.7. When special inspection is required, the architect or engineer of record shall submit the name and information for the inspection agency to the building official for approval prior to issuance of the building permit. Section 106.3.5. Please provide structural details & references for the trash enclosure per 5/A-2. The sheet numbers as noted on Sections referenced on floor plans per sheet A- 3.3 are incorrect. There is no step between the building segments on grid line 3 per floor plans or per Section plans as depicted on several foundation and roof framing details. Please delete such details on plans. Please reference window K per sheet A-7.3 on plans. Please dimension the maximum span of end bays on sheet S-3.2, adjacent to line 1, Le., not to exceed 10’ which is the limit of joist spans. CARLSBAD 98-2657 AUG 31,1998 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. b . Please cross reference different type panel connections on panel elevation plans. Please dimension the thickened pier heights on panel elevation plans in all cases. Please note where detail 13/S5 is referenced on plans. Please note the cap plate thickness on detail 11/S5. Please specify where details 4, 10, 11 & 19/S6 are referenced on plans. Section 1921.6.12 requires 6 O.C. rnax tie spacing as opposed to 16 O.C. Please revise details 17 & 181S6 and all other similar details. Please revise the tie spacing on detail 16/S6 per Sections 1921.3.3.2 & 1921.3.3.4. Le., 2 from each end, d/4 where shear ties are required and d/2 where they are not. To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, Le., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 619/560-1468. to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Alf Sadre at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. CARLSBAD 98-2657 AUG 31,1998 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE TOTAL VALUE J URl SDl CTl ON : CARLSBAD PLAN CHECK NO.: 98-2657 815,541 PREPARED BY: Ali Sadre DATE: AUG 31,1998 BUILDING ADDRESS: 1819 ASTON AVE. BUILDING OCCUPANCY: B/F1 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN Sheet I of 1 macvalue.dw 5196 z . The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal: therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to build. A Right-of-way permit is required prior to construction of the following improvements: Please s attached report of deficiencies marked tth 0. M e necessaty corrections to plans or spec 0 or compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. QbDate: (z$/!? $J By: Date: By: Date: Right-of-way Permit Application Right-of-way Permit Submittal Checklist and Information Sheet Recordation: hy 101, I987 C'i-$y-zZcl, 4 'I5 4 Carlsbad Tract: A4 Sewer Fee Information Sheet LWSP- " no" -7 -009-?576 - (619) 438-1161 - FAX (619) 438-0894 1 @ r BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST SITE PLAN Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: North Arrow D. Property Lines Existing & Proposed Structures E. Easements Existing Street Improvements F. Right-of-Way'Width & -JLC be '*-pw st+. R+~.*A SPt ir ?., ~ik &le Showonsite plan: pcr*:t\ GH redl tr0 4e r Md. .rik ,,,b &its\ G. Drivewaywidths Adjacent Streets 6r 1'4~9 0 A. Drainage Patterns 1. Building pad surface drainage must maintain a minimum slope of one 2. ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE: "Finish grade will provide a minimum positive B. Existing & Proposed Slopes and Topography percent towards an adjoining street or an approved drainage course. drainage of 2% to swale 5' away from building." 0 0 3. Include on title sheet: J 0 A. Site address B. Assessor's Parcel Number C. Legal Description For commerciallindustrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, include: total building square footage with the square footage for each different use, existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing, warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved. EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE 4a. Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of approval for No 0 0 0 0 4b. All conditions are in compliance. Date: 2 \VlbP~awBrURNQmDwoc~---t Frncmmr R." -7 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS ISTJ ~NDJ 3.~0~ 0 0 0 5. Dedication for all street Rights-of-way adjacent to the building site and any storm drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and for remodels with a value at or exceeding $ , pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.030. Dedication required as follows: Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8 %” x 11” plat map and submit with a title report. All easement documents must be approved and signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process. Submit the completed application form with the required checklist items and fees to the Engineering Department in person. Applications be accept by mail or fax. Dedication completed by: Date: IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS 6a. All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the construction exceeds $ , pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.040. Public improvements required as follows: 0 0 0 Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public improvement requirements. A registered Civil Engineer must prepare the appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements on the attached checklist to the Engineering Department through a separate plan check process. The completed application form and the requirements on the checklist must be submitted in person. Applications by mail or fax are not accepted. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of building permit. Improvement Plans signed by: Date: 0 0 0 6b. Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title report or we may prepare the necessary Future Improvement Agreement. This agreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building permit. Future public improvements required as follows: current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $ so 1 7 - \. 1" 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 2w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P 3" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 6c. Enclosed please find your Future Improvement Agreement. agreement signed and notarized to the Engineering Department. Future Improvement Agreement completed by: Date: Please return 6d. No Public Improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaaed or defective irnorovements found adiacent to buildina site must be reoaired to the satisfaction of the Citv lnsoector orior to occuoancy. GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMFNTS The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section 11.06.030 of the Municipal Code. 7a. Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading requirements. lndude accurate grading quantifies (cut, fill import, export). 7b. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer must be submitted together with the completed application form attached. The Gradina Permit must be issued and rouah aradinq aoDroval obtained Drior to issuance of a Buildina Permit. NOTE: Grading Inspector sign off by: if a grading permit is not required.) Date: 7c. Graded Pad Certification required. (Note: Pad certification may be required even 7d.NO Grading Permit required. 7e.lf grading is not required, write 'No Grading" on plot plan. MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS 8. A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-way and/or private work adjacent to the public Right-of-way. Types of work include, but are not limited to: street improvements, tree trimming, driveway construction, tieing into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities. Right-of-way permit required for: 4 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1 SI/ 2"d" 3w 0 0 0 9. A SEWER PERMIT is required concurrent with the building permit issuance. The fee is noted in the fees section on the following page. CI R 0 IO. INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT If your facility is located in the City of Carlsbad sewer service area, you need to contact the Carlsbad Municipal Water District, located at 5950 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008. District personnel can provide forms and assistance, and will check to see if your business enterprise is on the EWA Exempt List. You may telephone (760) 438-2722, extension 153, for assistance. Industrial Waste permit accepted by: Date: 0 0 0 11. NPDES PERMIT Complies with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant shall provide best management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever occurs Irst. 12. !/ Required fees are attached 0 No fees required c/o 0 0 0 0 13. Additional Comments: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET 0 0 Address: 819 As +Oh Ad. Bldg. Permit No. CB 98 - 2657 Prepared by: 9. R;C Date: )2/9ks Checked by: Date: EDU CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses. Types of Use: i,,m!bk-e (Sk[$q. Ft./Units: ?q, 336 Types of Use: Sq. Ft./Units: EDU's: ADT CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses. Estimate based on unconfirmed information from applicant. Calculation based on building plancheck plan submittal. EDU's: 5. 37 Types of Use: Wueiwe (yk( I) Sq. Ft./Units: ,291 336 ADT'S: I Y 6211 Types of Use: Sq. Ft./Units: ADT's: FEES REWIR WITHIN CFD: @ PARK-IN-LIEU FEE Y ES (no bridge & thoroughfare fee in District #1, reduced Traffic Impact Feel 0 NO PARK AREA & #: FEEIUNIT: X NO. UNITS =$ A 2. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ADT'dUNITS: I qd X FEE/ADT: 22 =$ 36 c/ d dBRiDGE AND THOROUGHFARE FEE (DiST. #i j DiST. #2 - DIST. #3 - 1 ADT'slUNITS: X FEE/ADT: =$ .@ d'FACiLiTiES MANAGEMENT FEE ZONE: 5 UNIT/SQ.FT.: 29; 33b X FEE/SQ.FT./UNIT: 4oa =$ ! 117 3 4 5. SEWER FEE PERMIT No. S698-2bl EDU's: 5.27 x FEEIEDU: I!S54 - -8 10,883 EDU's: 5.37 X FEEIEDU: lp7O =$ 6.28 j BENEFIT AREA: f DRAINAGE BASIN: 66. SEWER LATERAL ($2,5001 =$ /la 8/7. DRAINAGE FEES PLDA HIGH /LOW ACRES X FEE/AC: TOTAL OF ABOVE FEES*: $ *NOTE: This calculation sheet is NOT a complete list of all fees which may be due. Dedications and Improvements may also be required with Building Permits. 31 P-VEE CUCUUTK)N WORKSHEET REV 7/13/08 PLANNING DEPARTMENT BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST Plan Chevo Address I814 A &Dn f+?. Planner Phone (61 9) 438-1 161, extension 4%g I APN: 212 -\a0 - I1 mu, - e roject8ensity: DUIAC Remaining net dev acres: Type of Project & Use: ma/ H"~~~gCtu Zoning: &f General Plan: p 1 Facilities Management Zone: 5 CFD finlout) #-Date of participation: Circle One (For non-residential development: Type of land used created by this permit: ) Leaend: Item Complete 0 Item Incomplete - Needs your action 0 0 Environmental Review Required: YES - NO & TYPE DATE OF COMPLETION: Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: fl 0 0 Discretionary Action Required: YES NO TYPE APPROVALIRESO. NO. DATE PROJECT NO. OTHER RELATED CASES: Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: - Coastal Zone AssessmentlCompliance Project site located in Coastal Zone? YES- NOX CA Coastal Commission Authority? YES - - NO If California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact them at - 31 11 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 200, San Diego CA 92108-1725; (619) 521-8036 Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt): If NO, complete Coastal Permit Determination Form now. Coastal Permit Determination Log #: Follow-Up Actions: 1) Stamp Building Plans as "Exempt" or "Coastal Permit Required" (at minimum Floor Plans). 2) Complete Coastal Permit Determination Log as needed. Coastal Permit Determination Form already completed? YES - NO- 4300 >( - NO lnclusionary Housing Fee required: YES - Data Entry Completed? YES ~ (Effective date of lnclusionary Housing Ordinance ~ May 21, 1993.) - NO [Enter CB I: UACT; NEXT12 Construct housing Y/N; Enter Fee Amount [See fee schedule for amount): Return1 Site Plan: 1. Provide a fully dimensional site plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way width, dimensional setbacks and existing topographical lines. See -4 2. Provide legal description of property and assessor’s parcel number. Zoning: 1. Setbacks: Front: cAk?y? Required 36 Shown Interior Side: Required -6- Shown Street Side: && Required 2/0 Shown Rear: Required , Shown Shown Front: Required Interior Side: Required Shown Street Side: Required Shown Rear: Required Shown Structure separation: Required Shown 2. Accessory structure setbacks: rvb 3. Lot Coverage: 4. Height: Required 35 ‘w Shown 2s ‘ OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER dL, DATE 2- [b-y? 98299 . Bureau of Prevention rlsbad City o f Ca Fire Department Plan Review: Requirements Category: Building Plan Check Date of Report: Tuesday, August 25, 1998 Contact Name Nogle Onuffer ASSOC. Reviewed by: Address 2398 San Diego Avenue City, State San Diego CA92110 'EIp"6g. flept. No. tBS%=B657 Job Name Lot65- 1819 Planning No. Job Address 1819 Aston Ste. or Bldg. No. Approved - The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans; information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifica- tions, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can resuit in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. 0 Disapproved - Please see the attached report of deficiencies. Please make corrections to plans or specifications necessary to indicate compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. For Fire Department Use Only Review 1 st 2nd 3rd CFDJoW 98299 File# Other Agency ID 2560 Orion Way - Carlsbad, California 92008 (619) 931-2121 mLa!c Lo~#65 CMtI&% OP DATE s,2&,-= % . i% - ZED Structurah-Engineers i 7920 Miramar Ftd 1127 sgn 110 cov M (619) 549-6996 8- San Deigo Ca 92126 ~ CONTENTS : _________- _____-_--- j DESIGN LOADS ..................................... D1 --> D2 COLUMN DESIGN C1 --> C1 .. WALL DESIGN ....................................... W1 --> W6 F6OTINGS ......................................... F1 --> F2 LAT'ERAL ANALYSIS ................................. L1 --> i ROOF FRAMING ..................................... R1 --> WC'f i i .................................... : .* SPECIAL STRUCTURAL DESIGN ........................ SS1 --> SS i) GOVERNING CODES : _________________ ______-_-___-____ UNIFORM BUILDING CODE ............................. 1994 AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF STEEL CONSTRUCTORS MANUAL ... 9TH EDITION AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE (318-83) .............. 1983 DESIGN CRITEREA : - ________---__---_ _____----- 1- SEISMIC ZONE :4 . "BIV 2- WIND EXPOSURE 3- MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SOIL PRESSURE : 2,000 PSF CONT FTG 2,500 PSF PAD FTG 4- MATERIALS & DESIGN STRESSES (U.0.N) : - FRAMING LUMBER : DOUGLAS-FIR LARCH (NORTH) - BOLTED CONNECTIONS : STEEL FRAMING : A325-N - STRUCTURAL STEEL : A36 (FY 36 KSI) - REINFORCING STEEL : #4 & SMALLER ASTM 615 (FY 40 KSI) - CONCRETE : SLAB ON GRADE : (F'C = 2,500 PSI) WOOD FRAMING : A307 #5 & LARGER ASTM 615 (FY = 60 KSI) ALL OTHERS : (F'C = 3,000 PSI) 5- BASIC LIVE LOADS : ROOF FLOORS : BALCONIES CORRIDORS LIVING SPECIAL . .- LOT # /S A-ZED structunt wi consultrnts BHEET NO 01 OF- CALCULATCDBV AR Q DATE 5 -%-. 70 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. San Dlego, CA 92126 CHECKED BY DATE - - (619) 549-8996 lCALE ., :,, ,... , ., .! .I .!... i b7 #cg A-ZED struccunl EW~G consultlnrs SHEET NO Dz OF 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. CALCULATED Bv && 0 DATE 5-26-90 San Diego, CA 92126 CHCCKED BV DATE (619) (549-6996 &3T /t65 WEE7 NO d. OF A? o DATE 5-26-98 -. A-ZED Shuch~nl Em C&hb cALCULATCDBV 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. - DATE San Dlego, CA 92126 1619) 649-8896 CHECKED BY JDO-SgQC' &7 w 65 A-ZED stmaonl ~mhri& cofisultl~s OHEET NO d of 7275 Rock CSnyOn Dr. CALCULATEDOV RAO OATE 5 - Zb-98 San Dlego, CA 92126 CHECKED OV - DATE (619) 649-8988 . ....... . ....... ... .. .,...... ...... Jon 9gc-v Lor 6s- A-ZED struehlnl ~t~~i-&j conrultm(l *HCCT NO 4 OF 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. (619) 549-8996 CALCULATCD Bv.- DATC s - 26- 4A San Diego. CA 92126 CHCCKED BY ___ DATE I Tilt-Up Wall Panel Design L - I General Information h ~ . . . . . -. . . .. . . . . -. . I Description TYPICAL PANEL AT FRONT (I BACK OF BLDG. SUPPORTING PURLIN LOADS Clear Height 23.000 R fc 3.000.0 pgf Seismic Zone 4 Parapet Height 0.000 It FY 80,000.0 psi Min Vert Steel % 0.0020 Thickness 8.750 in Phi 0.900 Min Horir Steel % 0.0012 Bar Size 5 Width 12.000 in Ease Fixity 0% Bar Spacing 14.000 in Parapet Does Not Reduce Moma Wall Seismic Factor 0.3000 Bar Depth 3.000 in Parapet Seismic Factor 0.3000 Max Den. Ratio 150.0 LL 6 ST Not Combined Concrete Weight . 145.00 pcf Using: UBC Sac. 1914.0 method ... Exact, Non-iterated 1 Loads c Lateral Loads Vertical Loads Wind Load PSf Uniform DL 390.00 Wff Uniform LL 800.00 WR Point Load ibs ... eccentricity 5.500 in ... height ll ... load type Seismic Concentric DL WR Concentric LL #/R Lateral Load Wll ... distance to top R ... distance to bot ff Seismic "I" Magnifler 1.000 ... load type Seismic Wind "I" Magnifler 1.000 . ... I Wall Analysis I For Factored Load Strassq For Service Load Deflections Seismic w S&nk Basic Den wlo P-Delta 0.239 0.000 in 0.171 0.000 in Basic M wlo P-Delta 28,700.4 0.0 in# 20,500.3 0.0 in# Moment Excess of Mcr 17,713.1 0.0 in# 0.0 17.713.1 ind Max. P-Delta Deflection 7.522 0.000 in 0.171 0.000 in Max P-Delta Moment 42,688.7 0.0 in# 22,939.8 42,888.7 in# Maximum Allow Vertical Bar Spacing 18.000 in Parapet Ear Spacing Raq'd : SEISMIC 18.000 in Maximum Allow Horizontal Bar Spacing 18.000 in Parapet Bar Spacing Req'd : WIND 18.0M) in ., Wall Design OK 23.00R clear height, O.OOR parapet, 8.75111 thick with W bars at 14.00in on center, d= 3.00in. fc 3,000.0ps Using: UBC Sec. 1914.0 meth od... Exact, Non-Iterated Factored Load Bending : Seismic Load Governs Service Load Deflaction : Seismic Load Governs Maximum iterated Moment : Mu 42,888.75 in4 Maximum Iterated Deflection 0.171 in Moment Capacity 42.777.50 in# Deflection Limit 1.840 in Mn Phi : Moment Capacity 42,777.50 In# 41.919.82 In# Selmmlo Wind Applied: Mu @ Mid-Span 42,668.75 In-# 0.00 In# Applied: Mu @ Top of Wail 7,823.00 In4 0.00 in# I Max iterated Service Load Deflection 0.17 in 1,814 : 1 ~ctua~ Deflection Ratio 0.00 in 0 :1 Actual Reinforcing Percentage 0.0074 _- 0.0074 I Allowable Max. Reinf. Percent = 0.5 Rho Bai 0.0128 0.0128 I Actual Axial Stress : (Pw + Po )I Ag Allowable Mal Stress = 0.4 fm 18.39 psi 120.00 OS1 18.39 psi 120.00 DSi (e) 198397 ENERCALC c:bnerakWOJ9#la.w KW-Cu5UB310, vS.O.2, lJm19B7 Tma:CulSbadL~Blda 3 J0bxgBM)s o.(lnr: ZWDoudar Me: MSCIiptton Lwplcal Conc Panel al the Fmnt 6 Back of 8Wg Bcop.: _- lilt-Up Wall Panel Design -2 I Analysis Data 1 E 3,122,018.6 psi n = Es'l Ec 9.29 Fr = 273.86 psi Ht I Thk Ratio 40.89 Values for Mn Calculatl on... As:efk [Pu:tot + AsFyFy a : (AsFy + Pu)1(.85 Ic b) c = a 1.85 igross 307.547 In4 lcracked 16.06 In4 I-eff (ACI methods only) 0.00 In4 Phi: Capacity Reductlon 0.900 Mn = As:eff FY (d - ai21 47.530.56 in# 0.684 In Seismlc 0.297 in 0.582 In Sgross 91.125 in3 Mcr = S Fr 24.955.6 in# Rho: Bar Reint Pct 0.0214 wind 0.289 in 0.587 In 0.667 in 307.55 in4 15.80 in4 0.00 In4 0.900 48,577.36 in-# .. 1 Additional Value8 J Wind Lords used for InIlySl8 Factored Lords Wall Weight 81.582 psf Seismic Wall Wt Wail Seismic Factor 24.469 psf Applied Axial Load 548.00 409.50 Wft Service Applied Axial Load 390.00 Wfl Total Lateral Loads 1.859.16 1,394.37WR Service Wt bp Max Mom Wail Wt Parapet Seismic Factor 24.469 psf Lateral Wall Weight 1,313.18 984.87 Wft 937.97 Wft Total SelviceAxial Loads 1,327.97 #/I? LAC1 Factors (per ACI, applied Internally to entered loads) J ACI 9-1 a 9-2 DL 1.400 ACI 9-2 Group Factor 0.750 UBC 1921.2.7 "1.4" Factor 1.400 ACI 9-1 a 9-2 LL 1.700 ACI 9-3 Dead Load Factor 0.900 UBC 1921 2.7 "0.V Factor 0.900 ACI 0-1 a 9-2 ST 1 700 ACI 9-3 Short Term Factor 1.300 .... seismic = ST * : 1.100 i (c) 1983-97 ENERCALC c:bnemakWX9#la.ecw KW-0802610. V5.0.2, 1Jun-1997 LGenerai information I Description CONC. PANEL AT HIGH POINT NEAR RIDGE W/ NO GIRDER LOADING Clear Height Parapet Height Thickness Bar Size Bar Spacing Bar Depth Max Den. Ratio Concrete Weight 24.000 fl rc 3,000.0 psi Seismic Zone 4 80,000.0 61 Min Veri Steal % 0.0020 0.900 Min Horiz Steel % 0.0012 14.000 in Parapet Weight Counteracts Midd Wall Seismic Factor 0.3000 3.000 in Parapet Seismic Factor 0.3000 150.0 LL 6. ST Not Combined 145.00 pcf 1.000 fl FY 8.750 in Phi 5 Width 12.000 in Base Fixity 0% Using: UBC Sec. 1914.0 method ... Exact, Non-Iterated ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ ~ Lateral Loads Vertkd LOd8 Wind Load PSf Uniform DL Wfl Uniform LL fiwt Point Load ibs ... eccentricity in ., ... height fl ... load type Seismic Concentric DL Wfl Lateral Load #M ... distance to top fl ... distance to bot fl Seismic "I" Magnifier 1.000 ... load type Seismic Wind "I" Magnifler 1.000 WR . .. Concentric LL I Wail Analysis 1 For Factored Load Stress es For Sarvlce Load Deflect ions !Y!i& 0 000 in m 0 189 Seismic w Basic Defl w/o P-Delta 0.285 O.OO0 in ~~~~~~ ~ ~ Basic M w/o P-Delta 29,494.8 0.0 inf 21,087.8 0.0 inf Moment Excess of Mcr 18.659.2 0.0 in4 0.0 18,659.2 in# Max. P-Delta Deflection 8.185 0.000 in 0.189 O.OO0 in Max P-Delta Moment 41.814.8 0.0 I& 23,103.4 41,814.8 Inf Maximum Allow Vertical Bar Spacing 98.000 in Parapet Bar Spacing Raq'd : SEISMIC 18.000 in Maximum Allow Horizontal Bar Spacing 18.OOO in Parapet Bar Spacing Req'd : WIND 18.000 in Wail Design OK 24.00fl ~. clear height, I .OOfl parapet, 8.75111 thick with #5 bars at 14.00ln on center, d= 3.00ln, fc = 3,000.0ps Uslng: UBC Sec. 1914.0 meth od... Exact, Non-Iterated Factored L6ad Bending : Seismic Load Governs Service Load Deflection : Seismic Load Governs Maximum iterated Moment : Mu 41.814.80 in4 Maxlmum iterated Deflection 0.18s in Moment Capacity 42,08837 inf Deflection Limit 1.020 in Mn Phi : Moment Capacity Applied: Mu @ Mid-Span Applied: Mu @ Top of Wail Max Iterated Service Load Deflection Actual Deflection Ratlo Selrmlc 42,08837 In# 41,614.80 In# 205.54 In# 0.19 in 1,521 : 1 I Actual Reinforcing Percentage 0.0074 Allowable Max. Reinf. Perwnt = 0.5 Rho Bal 0.0128 - - Wind 41,397.81 In-# 0.00 in# 0.00 In# 0.00 in 0 :1 0.0074 0.0128 Actual Axial Stress : (Pw + Po ) I Ag Allowable Axial Stress = 0.4 fm 13.09 psi 13.06 psi 120.00 psi 120.00 psi c:bnereak\BB00911b KW~2U10, v5.0.2. 1 Jun-I997 (c) 198397 ENERCALC , .. I Tilt-Up Wall Panel Design LAnalysis Data L E 3,122,018.6 psi Sgross 91.125 In3 n=EslEc 9.29 Mcr = S Fr 24,955.6 in4 Fr = 273.86 psi Rho: Bar Reinf Pct 0.0214 lit I Thk Ratio 42.87 Values for Mn Calculatlon ... Selsmic Wlnd As:eff= [Pu:tot + AsFyyFy 0.290 In 0.284 in a : (AsFy + Pu)/(.85Cc b) 0.570 In 0.557 in c = a I .85 0.870 in 0.858 in 1gross 307.547 In4 307.55 in4 lcracked 15.85 In4 15.84 in4 I-eff (ACi methods only) 0.00 in4 0.00 In4 Mn = As:eff Fy (d - Sn) 46.702.03 In4 45.997.57 in4 Phi: Capacity Reduction 0.900 0.900 [Additional Values 1 Well Weight 81.582 psi Well Wt Wall Seismic Factor 24.489 psf Applled Axial Load 0.00 0.00 Wft -- n Loads used for anrlysla Factored Loads Wall Wt Parapet Selsmlc Factor 24.469 psf Lateral Wall Weight 1.484.44 1,113.33 Wft Servlce Applled Axlal Load 0.00 Ufl Totel Lateral Loads 1.484.44 1.113.33Wft Servlce Wt @ Max Mom Total Servlce Axlal Loads 1.060.31 Wfl 1,060.31 XM LAC1 Factors (per ACI, applled Internally to entered loads) L ACi 9-1 8 9-2 DL 1.400 ACI 9-2 Qroup Factor 0.750 UBC 1921.2.7"1.4" Factor 1.400 ACI 9-1 8 9-2 LL 1.700 ACi 9-3 Dead Load Factor 0.900 UBC 1921.2.7 "0.9 Factor 0.900 ACI 9-1 a 9-2 ST 1.700 ACi g-3 Short Term Factor 1.300 .... selsmic- ST' : 1.100 i scop.: .. Tilt-UD Wall Panel Deslan P- tb 1 General Information Description CONC. PANEL AT HIGH POINT NEAR RIDGE WITH GIRDER LOADING I Clear Height Parapet Height Thickness Bar Size Bar Spacing Bar Depth Max Defl. Ratio Concrete Weight 24.000 ff rc 3,000.0 psi Seismic Zone 4 1.000 ff FY 60,000.0 psi Min Vert Steel % 0.0020 6.750 in Phi 0.900 Min Horir Steel % 0.0012 8.000 in Parapet Weight Counteracts Midd Wall Saismic Factor 0.3000 4.000 In Parapet Seismic Factor 0.3000 150.0 LL & ST Not Combined 145.00 DCf 5 Width 12.000 in Base Fixity 0% Using: UBC Sec. 1914.0 m&xd ... Exact, Non-Iterated - - I Loads 1 Lateral Loads Verticri Load8 Wind Load PSf Uniform DL 5,800.00 WR Uniform LL 5.800.00 Wff Point Load ibs ... eccentricity 2.000 in ..:height R ... load type Seismic Concentric DL WR Concentric LL WR Lateral Load WR ... distance to top R ... distance to bot ff Seismic "I" Magnifler 1.000 ... load type Seismic Wind "I" Magnifier 1.000 For Factored Load Strasrea For Service Load DaflectipOl Basic Defl wlo P-Delta Basic M w/o P-Delta &&& !!Y!!la 0.353 0.000 in 0.252 0.000 in 38.150.5 0.0 in# 27.250.4 0.0 in# Ym .~ ~ Moment Excess of Mcr 77: 186.6 0.0 in# 15,322.3 77.18i.6 in# Max. P-Delta Deflection 6.701 0.000 in 1.253 0.OOO in Max P-Delta Moment 102,142.2 0.0 in3. 40,277.9 102,142.2 In4 Maximum Allow Velticel Bar Spacing 18.OOO in Parapet Bar Spacfng Req'd : SEISMIC 18.OOO in Maxlmum Allow Horizontal Bar Spacing 18.000 in Parapet Bar Spacing Req'd : WIND 18.000 In Wall Design OM 24.0M1 clear height. I .OOfl parapet, 6.75in thick wHh #5 bars at 8.00in on center, d= 4.001n. fc = 3,000.Ops1, Using: UBC Sec. 1914.0 method ... Exact. Non-Iterated Factored Load Bending : Seismic Load Govern¶ Service Load Deflection : Seismic Load Governs Maximum iterated Moment : Mu 102,142.18 in4 Maximum iteratad Deflaction 1.253 in Moment Capacity 108.928.43 in# Deflection Limn 1.920 in Mn Phi : Moment Capacity Applied: Mu @ MidSpen Applied: Mu @ Top of Wall Selamlc Wind 106.928.43 In-# 104,198.87 In# 102,142.18 In-# 0.00 In-# 32,885.52 in# 0.00 in# Max iterated Servlce Load Deflection Actual Reinforcing Percentage 0.0097 Allowable Max. Reinf. Percent = 0.5 Rho Bai 0.0128 1.25 in Actual Deflection Ratio 230 :I Actual Axial Stress : (Pw + Po )I Ag Allowable Axlei Stress = 0.4 fm I 84.70 psi 120.00 mi 0.00 in 0 :1 0.0097 0.0128 84.70 psl 120.00 DSl (c) 1-97 ENERCALC c:brmmkW8fY3W IC KW-0802810. V5.0.2.1J1#?-1007 .- Ab ”_ TM:C.~~~~LLB~ 3 JOb*WLWB Dsgnr: WDoudar Ma: scope : a-bn : Conc Panel d Hbh Pdnt nuar RMo L -2 I Tilt-Up Wall Panel Design I Analysis Data - E 3.122.018 8 PSI Sgross 91 125 in3 n = Es I Ec 9 29 Mcr = S Fr 24,955 8 In-# Fr = 273 88 psi Rho Bar Ralnf Pct 0 0214 Ht I Thk Ratlo 42 87 .” Vafcrcm for Mn Calculation ... As:eff= [Pu:tot + AsFyyFy Seismic 0.825 in Wind 0.585 In a : [AsFy + Pu)/(.85 fc bj 1.147 in c = a I .85 1.442 In 1.350 in lgross 307.547 In4 307.55 in4 hacked 49.99 In4 48.01 in4 I-aff (ACI methods only) 0.00 In4 0.00 in4 Mn = As:eff Fy (d - nL?) 121,031.59 in4 115,775.53 In-# 1.228 In Phl: Capacity Reduction 0.900 0.900 1 Addltlonal Values I Factored Lords Loads used for malyrls Wall Weight 81 562 psf Seismic Wind Wall Wt Wall Selsrnlc Factor 24 489 DSf Aoolled Axial Load 8 120 00 8 090 00 XIR ~. ~~ ~~ ~~~~ Wall Wt Parapet Selsmlc Factor 24.489 psf Lbiaral Wall Weight 1,484.44 1,113.33 XM Service Applied Mal Load 5.800.00 Ufl Total Lateral Loads 9,804.43 7,203.33 Ufl Service Wt @ Max Morn Total Service Axlal Loads 1.080.31 #fl 8.880.31 Wfl ACI 9-1 a 9.2 DL 1.400 ACI 9-2 Qroup Factor 0.750 UBC 1921.2.7 “1.4” Factor 1.400 ACI 9-1 8 9-2 LL 1.700 ACI 9-3 Dead Load Factor 0.900 UBC 1921.2.7 “0.9‘ Factor 0.900 ACI 9-1 8 9-2 ST 1.700 ACI 9-3 Short Term Factor 1.300 .... selsrnlc=ST*: 1.100 (e) 193397 ENERCALC c:-\gBM)(M10 KWM#~BIO. v5.o.z. t~un-im7 Lo7 i46S A-ZED srmctunl E& cauulwm WECT NO. PI OF 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. CALCULATEDBV Ah /3 DATE 5 - tb-90 CHECKED BY - DATE San Dlego. CA 92128 (819) 549-6998 1, ...I... ....,...... .,,..... ! ,... .,. . . ,. , . , ..,.. . ,.. . JoB3c k7 #d5 A-ZED stn~unl wG c-tt~mm WCCT NO A or CALCULATED BY #no DATE 4-26-78 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. .- - DATE Sen Diego. CA 92126 CHECKED BY (819) 549-8998 .t .... *. ..... ... .. ....... I ......... ! I1 ........ I .......... j .... r ......... !i I ...... .'....... s .... i I .. .- lor cl c 01 - A-ZED Sauctunl LIW~GC- 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. San Dlego, CA 92128 CALCULATED BY- DATE B - 27 % CHECICD BY DATC ICALE (819) 549-8998 -- JOI Lir 65 A-ZED strachlnl EW~W~GCOWUME ancet NO. Of 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. I619\ 549-6996 CALCULATED rr- DATE 4- 27 - 78 Sen Dlego, CA 92126 CHECUED IV DATE .. ... , ... .....,. ... , ........ , .- -, ICALE ..... .... ..i 8 ....* ..... ................... ..... ......... ........ .... . ., .............. ,..... .. .. ........ A,.; ..... ..... . rfi.+yc; ......... we,.. .>..#...!. ............ ..i ................. ....,... .... ....... ........ ...... ....... t .....,.... ,- ._ : ....... .. -. i i ~~ ... JOB 98d9oR 62' 6F CALCULATEDIV 440 DATE 3 -r-38 A-ZED strurmnl EW- condm 8HECT NO L2A.F 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. - DATE San Dlego. CA 92126 (619) 549-6996 CHECKED BV .. *. JOB 9800 9 L.7 6s CALCULATED81 A A 0 DATE r- f-- 325 A-ZED S-A E- catnrlmn WEIT NO. "' OF 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. San Dlago, CA 92128 CHECKED DV - DATE (819) 549-8996 i .. ,. .. . i ” LoT 6C OHLET NO OF CALCULATED *V- DATE 5 CUECKED IV -27-48 A-ZED stnrchlnl ~~~consuitmm 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. San Dlego, CA 92126 (619) 549-6996 DATE ,- i ! i I. !. ~ , I , i: , .-. I. I LOT &C OF - A-ZED shuecunl -&cdmm 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. CALCULATEDDV- DATE 4. 77 CHECKEDDV - - DATE San Diego. CA 92128 (819) 549-8998 .. A-ZED struaunl E~~COIWI~~~ anm NO. LS or CALCULATED SV- DATE 5- 22 - 98 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. San Dlego, CA 92126 CHECIED #V DAll (619) 549-6906 SCALE .. LnT 65 A-ZED struaunl En&ie&Cdb 8nm NO. L6, OF CALCULATEDEV 2F.D OATE 5- z2-98 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. __ OATE San Dlago. CA 92126 (619) 549-6996 CHECKED BY . .. .~ . . . .. . .. .. . , .’ i .~ . JD,2<1 mfx A-ZED sauctunl ~c~~~~~mnta 8H€€T NO. L7 OF 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. (619) 549-6996 CALCULATED BY- DATE - DATE - 22 - 98 San Dlego, CA 92126 CHECUEDIY ___ JOB YPoo? b7 cs A&~’s~Ic~I ~n~imeri~g cc!mhata WECT NO. L 7A OF -- c 3e 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. CALCULATED DV A-,A.n DAlE San Dlego, CA 92126 CHECKED IV DATE (619) 540-6996 WALE t.: !E ’., JOLA%T5 bT 6- A-ZED struaunl Enghcc& CdtUIb OHECT NO we OF CALCULATCO ny 5 - 27 - 70 7275 Rock Canyon M. ZFP San Dlego, CA 92128 CHECKED DV - DATE (619) 649-6996 - - ..... I... .... ~ ..I.. .. .j ........ i... . .;. .. I i' ; !!i ..I ...... 1 .... 1 .,.,.I ........ ! ..... ,... 111 I, .......... ...... ....... ....... .... ........ .......... .......... ... ........ ....... Lo7 6A fl Ot - 27- 9A A-ZED stmcttuu~ ~qiwwiiG~consu~~ 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. San Olego, CA 92128 1610) 549-6988 CALCULATED BV- DITC 5 CHECKED BY - DATE , i ,, r . ... . . .. romLL%2zz - A-ZED sbua~nl ~wineeriXccdmota WEE1 NO. IO Of CALCULATEDDV- DATE S -c 27 ‘?8 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. __ DATE San Dlego. CA 02126 (610) 540-6096 CHECKED DV UT /;C 212D DAlE Lf- SO-98 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. ..I lWCCf NO. OT CALCULATEDBY A-ZED struaunl E-~CC~BUIIUIIE San Dlego, CA 92126 CHECKED BV __ DATE SCALE (619) 549-6998 1 , ..,.......... j.. . 1, I .... I.. . . :, i. . . , i .~ . .. i .. Jon.avq LOT & A-ZED srmaunl ~~ine~ cmmt(.atl 8HCCT NO. L-r z OF - CALCULATED IV 'FD DATC San Dlego, CA 92128 CHECKED IV __ DAT€ 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. OCALC (619) 549-8996 ,.. . . I.. . . . , ... , : I .... i.. I .. ., ..,. .,...,.. ... ,. z... ..i JDI 48c9---&&- A-ZED srmctlvrl --cdanb WCCT NO. 3 OF 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. CALCULATED BY -. - 7.43 DATE 5- 22 -9cs CWECKED BY - DATE ICALE San Diego, CA 92126 (619) M9-6996 Lo7 CALCULATED av-- DATE G- 27 - TB A-ZED smccc~nl ~igcma~~cwl Joa-Li inccr NO. Of ___ 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. (618) 549-6886 San Dlego. CA 82126 CHECKED IIV __ DATE WALE .... ,1..i .... .. . ;.. . i .. . ,. i 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. San Dlego, CA 92126 (619) 549-6996 LoT 65- OV *D DATE 6 -27- 9;3 A-ZED -iigc,-~m 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. CALCULATED~Y San Dlego, CA 92126 CHECIED 8Y '.- - DATE (619) 549-6996 8CALE ,, 8, 4. mB*y &7 GS A-ZED shuc~nl mg&cmuimta ancci NO. L I7 OF CALCULATCDIIY DAlC 5 27-Lt4 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. San Dlego, CA 92126 16181 549-6996 CHECKCD BY __ DATE - <. LOT 6s A-ZED smnl miw&gcdtauta OF ~ WCCT NO CALCULATCDIY ZPD DATS 5-27 w 7s 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. San Dlago, CA 92126 CHECKED BV - DATE (619) 549-6996 8CALC ............. .. .... ;... . ..; .......... ; .............. ...., . .~. ... I.. . .. TRANSMITTING Ip(slXUrnRAL CALCULATIONS COPKS. 0 STRUCTURAL BLUE PRINTS SETS. RETURMJUG 0 REDMARKEDDRAWINGS.!WZ'TS 0 REDMARKED SPECIFICATIONS, SECXIONS 0 SHOP DRAWINGS STAMPED UOI'HEiR ~ 'I"SMl"G ORIGINALS 0 STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS. SWEETS SENTBY: FRDM : FI-ZED ENtINEERS . a. PKEE M. : 1 619 S49 6996 NGV. 18 1958 06:m P04 CONCRETE PIER 5ECTION pMx.E M. : 1 619 549 69% Nov. 18 1938 86:3wn pB5 CONCRETE PIER SECTION ./00/.08 YON 12:41 FAX 6107560837 iG LANIKAI LAMKAl MANA~coRpoRATKlN $. z <- Fgool TELECOPIER COVER PACE To: &kjwf FAX NUMBER: FROM b I- ! I :, Tills FAX CONSISTS OF &PACESES, INCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET COMMENmr s , * -dM- /- . # r / n I Y THIS FAX NUMBER IS (619) 756-9837 IF THERE IS A PROBLEM IN RECEIVING ANY OF TliESE PAGE!& PLEASE CALL (619) 7569820. OPERATOR . .~ . .. .. . .. ;: . YON 12:41 FAX 6197569837 1C LANIMI CALENGINEERING 562 799 9459 02/09 $98 09:zo luo.as, 07 NorCal Engineering Soils and C,cotcchnicsd Consultants 1064 I Humbolt Syea LUS Almitos, Ch 90720 (562)799-W69 FAX (ShZ)799-94)459 P.Q. Box 9672 Rancho Santa, California 92087 February 6, 1998 Project Number 7101-97 ’10 lY12/@ p&f& I- “f:/fL ,- (lo.. - L’ =O. Pmmc s PkC4l-q Ann: Mr. T. Lawrence Jett RE: Addendum No. 2 -Preliminary Geotechnicsl Inwstigatmn Report dated December 5, 1997 - Proposed Multi-Unit Structures - Located at the Southeast Corner of College Boulevard and Abton Avenue. in the City of tartabad. California Dear Mr. Jett: As requested, rigid pavement section design is being provided for the above referenced project. The sectins given are based upon an estimated R-value of 30 for pavement areas. Type of Traffic Icalnc lI!skx Light Vehicle Parking 4 Light Vehiele Circulation Areas .s Medium Truck 8 Heavy Truck 7 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 Concrete may be placed directly upon subgrade roils compacted to a minimum of 90% relative compaction in the upper 12 inches. Subgrade soils should be moisture condiiionod to 130% of optimum moisture levels immediately prior to placement concrete. We appreciate this opportunity lo be of service to you. If you have any queellons, please d act the underrigned. . .I<: 2 Scott 0. Spensiero Project Manager further Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Multi-Unit Structures College Boulevard & Aston Avenue Carlsbad, California Project Nurn ber 71 01 -97 December 5,1997 NorCal Engineering NorCal Engineering December 5. 1997 Soils and Geotechnical Consultants 10641 Humbolt Street Los Alamitos, CA 90720 (562) 799-9469 Fax (562) 799-9459 ILIrK J - Project Number 7101-97 Lanikai Management Corporation P.O. Box 9672 Rancho Santa Fe, California 92067 Attn: T. Lawrence Jett RE: Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation - Proposed Multi-Unit Structures - Located at the Southeast comer of College Boulevard and Aston Avenue, in the City of Carlsbad. California Dear Mr. Jett: Pursuant to your request, this firm has performed a Geotechnical Investigation for the above referenced project in accordance with your authorization of proposal dated October 29, 1997. The purpose of this investigation is to evaluate the geotechnical conditions of the subject site and to provide recommendations for the proposed project. This geotechnical engineering report presents the finding of our study along with conclusions and recommendations for development. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Respectfully submitted, NORCAL ENGINEERING b. 12/3 1 /m Keith D. Tucker Project Engineer R.G.E. 841 Scott D. Spensiero Project Manager .dl *< December 5, 1997 Page 2 Project Number 7101-97 Project DescnDtlon The purpose of the investigation was to explore the subsurface conditions and to provide preliminary geotechnical engineering design parameters for evaluation of the site with respect to the proposed project. It is anticipated that the proposed development will consist of officeharehouse buildings on the 27 acre property as shown on the Preliminary Grading Plan by Robert Stocton dated November 20, 1985. Other improvements will consist of asphaltic paved parking and driveway areas, concrete loading areas and landscaping. .. Site Descrlotlon The subject site consists of two bi-level mass graded located within Carlsbad Research Center. The site is situated at the southeast corner of Aston and College, in the City of Carlsbad. The generally rectangular shaped site is elongated in an north to south direction with topography descending from west to east. An approximately 4 feet high graded slope separates the two lots. The parcel is currently undeveloped and covered with a sparse to moderate growth of vegetation consisting of natural grasses and weeds. The site is bordered by ascending slopes along the east property line and descending slopes along the south, north and west property perimeter ranging in height from 55 to 520 feet. .. The Carlsbad Research Center development consists of several individual lots located within the tract which had been recently mass graded for future development. The earthwork operations were performed and were geotechnically observed and tested by San Diego Consultants, Inc., as described by their report tilted, As-Graded Geotechnical Report, Phases, dated April, 1988, Job No. 05-2863-006-00-10 The subject parcel consists of a graded transition lot with a maximum fill depth of 22 feet located at the southwest corner. The cut slope are generally on the east side of the lot. NorCal Engineering December 5,1997 Page 3 Project Number 7101-97 Eisld Invesm The investigation consisted of the placement of ten subsurface trenches by a backhoe to a maximum depth of 20 feet placed strategically in proposed areas of development. The explorations were visually classified and logged by a field engineer with locations of the subsurface explorations shown on the attached Site Plan. The exploratory excavations revealed the existing earth materials to consist of an engineered fill and bedrock. A detailed description of the subsurface conditions are listed on the excavation logs in Appendix A. These soils are described as follows: .. Fill: An engineered fill was encountered consisting predominately of a brown to tan brown, CLAY, silty sandy clay and clayey SANDS. These soils were noted to be densektiff and damp and moist. Native Soils: A reddish brown CLAY, sandy with gravel and rock were encountered in a portion of the excavations. These native soils were very stiff and dry to damp. Bedrock: A grey siltstone with fine grained interbeds was encountered in test excavations 4, 6, and 8. The bedrock was noted to be moderately hard to hard and moist: The upper 1.5 to 3.0 of the surface soils were noted to be disturbed and loose from the existing surface vegetation and past discing operations. These upper soils were very moist due to recent rains. No groundwater was encountered to the depth of our excavations and no caving occurred. ' NorCal Engineering ! 1 4. December 5.1997 Page 4 Project Number 7101-97 - Relatively undisturbed samples of the subsurface soils were obtained to perform laboratory testing and analysis for direct shear, consolidation tests, and to determine in- place moistureldensities. These undisturbed samples consisted of one inch rings with inside diameter of 2.5 inches. Bulk bag samples were obtained in the upper soils for expansion index tests, maximum density tests, atterberg limits and sulfate tests. All test results are included in Appendix B, unless noted otherwise. A. The field moisture content (ASTM:D 2216) and the dry density of the ring samples were determined in the laboratory. This data is listed on the log of excavations. B. Maximum density tests (ASTM: D-1557-78) were performed on typical samples of the upper soils. Results of these tests are shown on Table 1. C. Expansion index tests in accordance with the Uniform Building Code Standard No. 29-2 were performed on remolded samples of the upper soils to determine the expansive characteristics. Results of these tests are provided on Table II. D. Soluble sulfate tests in accordance with EPA Method 9038 were performed on representative soils samples to estimate the potential for corrosion of concrete in contact with the on-site soils. Results are provided in Table IV. E. Direct shear tests (ASTM: D-3080) were performed on undisturbed and disturbed samples of the subsurface soils. These tests were performed to determine parameters for the calculation of the safe bearing capacity. The test is performed under saturated conditions at loads of 500 Ibs./sq.ft., 1,000 Ibs./sq.ft., and 2,000 Ibs.lsq.ft. with results shown on Plate A. NorCal Engineering t. .I December 5, 1997 Page 5 Project Number 7101-97 F. Consolidation tests (ASTM: D-2435) were performed on undisturbed samples to determine the differential and total settlement which may be anticipated based upon the proposed loads. Water was added to the samples at a surcharge of one KSF and the settlement curves are plotted on Plate B. Conclusions and Recommendations Based upon our evaluations, the proposed. development is acceptable from a geotechnical engineering standpoint. By following the recommendations and guidelines set forth in our report, the structures will be safe from excessive settlements under the anticipated design loadings and conditions. The proposed development shall meet all requirements of the City Building Ordinance and will not impose any adverse effect on existing adjacent structures. In addition, this firm has reviewed the previous geotechnical reports by San Diego Geotechnical Consultants, Inc., and concurs overall that the geotechnical conditions of the subject site are currently representative of the conditions encountered during the described rough grading report. It is our opinion that the planned grading is geotechnically feasible provided that all of the recommendations presented in our geotechnical report is implemented and the information in the San Diego Consultants, Inc. is accurate. The following sections present a discussion of geotechnical related requirements for specific design recommendations of different aspects of the project. It is recommended that site inspections be performed by a representative of this firm during all grading and construction of the development to verify the findings and recommendations documented in this report. Any unusual conditions which may be encountered in the course of the project development may require the need for additional study and revised recommendations. NorCal Engineering December 5, 1997 Page 6 Project Number 7101-97 Val- All slopes impacting the subject site are considered to be grossly and surficial stable. The slopes constructed during mass grading operations were built at a slope ratio no greater than 2 to 1 (horizontal to vertical) and appear to be in accordance with previous project plans and specifications. These slopes would appear to possess safety factors of 1.50 or greater for gross stability. In addition, an observation of these slopes appear to perform adequately with respect to surficial stability. However, to minimize future erosion, the slope maintenance recommendations should be implemented. The landscaping shall consist of a suitable proportion of deep rooted slope plantings classified as being drought resistant. The possibility of construction delays, weather conditions and plant growth may require additional erosion control measures such as matting, netting and plastic sheeting. Site Gradina Recommendations Any vegetation shall be removed and hauled from proposed grading areas prior to the start of grading operations. Any removed soils may be reutilized as compacted fill once any deleterious material or oversized materials (in excess of eight inches) is removed. All grading operations shall be performed in accordance with the attached “Specifications for Compacted Fill Operations”. All upper disturbed soils (upper one foot) shall be removed, the exposed surface shall be scarified to a depth of 12 inches, brought to the proper moisture content and compacted to a minimum of 90% of the laboratory standard (ASTM: D-1557-78) prior to placement of any additional compacted fill soils. In building areas of transition between bedrock, native soils and engineered fill, additional overexcavation of bedrocklnative soils consisting of a depth of three feet below proposed foundations including floor slab areas is required to mitigate the potential of differential settlement. Otherwise all foundation for each individual building shall be embedded into engineered fill or all into bedrock. This fill shall extend a minimum of five horizontal feet or to the depth of vertical overexcavation, whichever is greater, beyond the outside edge of the perimeter foundation. All parking subgrade NorCal Engineering December 5, 1997 Page 7 Project Number 7101-97 areas will require the removal of all disturbed soils (upper one foot) prior to placement of any additional fill or pavement. and Subsidence Results of our in-place density tests reveal that the soil shrinkage will be on the order of 8 to 12% within the engineered fill soils, based upon the assumption that the fill is compacted to 92% of maximum dry density per ASTM standards. Subsidence should be 0.25 feet due to earthwork operations. The volume change does not include any allowance for vegetation or organic stripping, removal of subsurface improvements or topographic approximations. Although these - values are only approximate, they represent our best estimate of lost yardage which will likely occur during grading. If more accurate shrinkage and subsidence factors are needed, it is recommended that field testing using the actual equipment and grading techniques should be conducted. Temporary unsurcharged excavations in the existing site materials less than 5 feet high may be made at a vertical gradient unless cohesionless soils are encountered. Temporary unsurcharged excavations from 5 to 10 feet high may be trimmed at a 1 to l(horizonta1 to vertical) gradient. In areas where soils with little or no binder are encountered, where adverse geological conditions are exposed, or where excavations are adjacent to existing structures, shoring, slot-cutting, or flatter excavations may be required. The temporary cut slope gradients given above do not preclude local raveling and sloughing. All excavations shall be made in accordance with the requirements of CAL- OSHA and other public agencies having jurisdiction. Care should be taken to provide or maintain adequate lateral support for all adjacent improvements and structures at all times during the grading operations and construction phase. All foundations may be designed utilizing the following safe bearing capacities for a embedded depth of 24 inches into approved compacted fill soils or bedrock with the corresponding widths: NorCal Engineering *I \. December 5,1997 Page 8 !b!mlm 1.5 2.0 4.0 5.0 Project Number 7101-97 Continuous Isolated 2000 2500 2075 2575 2275 2775 2375 2875 A one third increase may be used when considering short term loading and seismic forces. AI1 continuous foundations shall be reinforced a minimum of one b.4 bar, top and bottom. Isolated foundations may be reinforced at the discretion of the project structural engineer. All foundations located near adjacent slopes shall meet all setback criteria per the 1994 Uniform Building Code (UBC). The bottom of foundations located adjacent to descending slopes shall maintain a safe horizontal setback consisting of 113 the height of the slope from bottom of the footing to the face of the slope. The following values may tie utilized in resisting lateral loads imposed on the structure. Requirements of the current Uniform Building Code should be adhered to when the coefficient of friction and passive pressures are combined: Coefficient of Friction - 0.35 Equivalent Passive Fluid Pressure = 200 Ib./cu.ft. Maximum Passive Pressure = 2,000 Ibs./sq.ft. The passive pressure recommendations are valid only for compacted fill soils and/or competent bedrock materials. NorCal Engineering ._ December 5, 1997 Page 9 Project Number 7101-97 Resultant pressure curves for the consolidation tests are shown on Plate B. Computations utilizing these curves and the recommended safe bearing capacities reveal that the foundations will experience settlements on the order of 3/4 inch and differential settlements of less than 1/4 inch. Settlements will occur due to foundation loads and area fill surcharge pressures. Existing fill soils will incur additional settlement over time with the area subsidence on the order of a 1/2 inch across the length of the structures. The associated angular rotation of wall footings should be less than 1/2 inch over 40'linear feet at the site. Thus, shallow building foundations should be designed for these differential settlements during the design life of the structure. all Des ian Pa raw Active earth pressures against retaining walls will be equal to the pressures developed by the following fluid densities. These values are for granular free draining backfill material placed adjacent to the walls at various ground slopes above the walls. Surface Slope of Retained Materials Equivalent Fluid (Horizontal to YaiidJ Level 5 to 1 4 to 1 3 to 1 2to1 30 35 38 40 45 Any applicable short-term construction surcharges and seismic forces should be added to the above lateral pressure values. A backfill zone of non-expansive material shall consist of a wedge beginning a minimum of one horizontal foot from the base of the wall extending upward at an inclination no less than 3/4 to 1 (horizontal to vertical). All walls shall be waterproofed as needed and protected from hydrostatic pressure by a reliable permanent subdrain system. NorCal Engineering !' ., December 5, 1997 Page 10 Project Number 7101-97 Slab Recommendations All concrete floor slabs shall be a minimum of five inches in thickness reinforced a minimum of No. 3 bars, eighteen inches in each direction positioned in the center of the slab and placed on approved subgrade soils. Prior to placement of slabs, the subgrade soils shall be moisture conditioned above optimum moisture content to a depth of eighteen inches. A vapor barrier overlain by four inches of approved sand shall be utilized beneath all floor slabs sensitive to the infiltration of moisture. All concrete slab areas to receive floor coverings should be moisture tested to meet all manufacturer requirements prior to placement. Corrosion DesianCritaria Representative samples of the surficial soils, typical of the subgrade soils expected to be encountered within foundation excavations, revealed low levels of sulfate concentrations. Therefore, no special cement foundations are deemed necessary and a Type II cement shall be utilized'for building foundations at this time. Additional sulfate tests shall be performed at the completion of rough grading to assure that these soils are consistent with the recommendations stated in this design. Sulfate test results may be found on the attached Table 111. Pave- i The table below provides a preliminary pavement design based upon an estimated R- Value of 30 for the proposed pavement areas. Final pavement design may need to be based on R-value testing of the subgrade soils near the conclusion of rough grading to assure that these soils are consistent with those assumed in this preliminary design. Tvoe of Traffic Light Vehicle Parking Traffic Asphaltic Base hkx Concrete f in) -1 4.0 3.0 3.5 Light Vehicle Circulation Areas 5.0 3.0 4.5 Med. Truck Parking & Circulation Areas 6.0 3.5 6.5 (GVW 42,000 Ibs.; 3 axle) (GVW c 90,000 Ibs.; 5 axle) Heavy Truck Areas 7.0 3.5 NorCal Engineering .j December 5, 1997 Page 11 Project Number 7101-97 Pavement section thickness should be increased for areas where heavier vehicular use or larger wheel loads are anticipated. All concrete slabs to be utilized for pavement or utilized for forklift use shall be a minimum of six inches in thickness and placed on approved compacted subgrade soils. Any approved base material shall consist of a Class II aggregate or equivalent and should be compacted to a minimum of 95% relative compaction. All pavement materials shall conform to the requirements set forth by the City of Carlsbad. The base material and asphaltic concrete should be tested prior to delivery to the site and during placement to determine conformance with the project specifidtions. A pavement engineer shall designate the specific asphalt mix design to meet the required project specifications. The recommendations and conclusions contained in this report are based upon the soil conditions uncovered in our test excavations. No warranty of the soil condition between our excavations is implied. NorCal Engineering should be notified for possible further recommendations if unexpected to unfavorable conditions are encountered during construction phase. It is the responsibility of the owner to ensure that all information within this report is submitted to the Architect and appropriate Engineers for the project. This firm should have the opportunity to review the final plans to verify that all our recommendations are incorporated. This report and all conclusions are subject to the review of the controlling authorities for the project. A preconstruction conference should be held between the developer, general contractor, grading contractor, city inspector, architect, and geotechnical engineer to clarify any questions relating to the grading operations and subsequent construction. Our representative should be present during the grading operations and construction phase to certify that such recommendations are complied within the field. NorCal Engineering ', . i, , December 5,1997 Page 12 Project Number 7101-97 The geotechnical investigation has been conducted in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill exercised by members of our profession currently practicing under similar conditions in the Southern California area. No other warranty, expressed or implied is made. NorCal Engineering .I ..I '$ . .. December 5, 1997 Page 13 Project Number 7101-97 Preparation Any existing low density soils and/or saturated soils shall be removed to competent natural soil under the inspection of the Soils Engineering Firm. After the exposed surface has been cleansed of debris and/or vegetation, it shall be scarified until it is uniform in consistency, brought to the proper moisture content and compacted to a minimum of 90% relative compaction (in accordance with ASTM: D-1557-78). Material For Fill The on-site soils or approved import soils may be utilized for the compacted fill provided they are free of any deleterious materials and shall not contain any rocks, brick, asphaltic concrete, concrete or other hard materials greater than eight inches in maximum dimensions. Any import soil must be approved by the Soils Engineering firm a minimum of 24 hours prior to importation of site. Placement of Compacted Fill Soils The approved fill soils shall be placed in layers not in excess of six inches in thickness. Each lift shall be uniform in thickness and thoroughly blended. The fill soils shall be brought to within 15% of the optimum moisture content, unless otherwise specified by the Soils Engineering firm. Each lift shall be compacted to a minimum of 90% relative compaction (in accordance with ASTM: D-1557-78) and approved prior to the placement of the next layer of soil. Compaction tests shall be obtained at the discretion of the Soils Engineering firm but at a minimum of one test for every 500 cubic yards placed andlor for every two vertical feet of compacted fill placed. NorCal Engineering ., .,I 'I .. December 5. 1997 Page 14 Project Number 7101-97 ' The minimum relative compaction shall be obtained in accordance with accepted methods in the construction industry. The final grade of the structural areas shall be in a dense and smooth condition prior to placement of slabs-on-grade or pavement. No fill soils shall be placed, spread or compacted during unfavorable weather conditions. When the grading is interrupted by heavy rains, compaction operations shall not be resumed until approved by the Soils Engineering firm. Grading Observations The controlling governmental agencies should be notified prior to commencement of any grading operations. This firm recommends that the grading operations be conducted under the observation of a Soils Engineering firm as deemed necessary. A 24 hour notice must be provided to this firm prior to the time of our initial inspection. Observation shall include the clearing and grubbing operations to assure that all unsuitable materials have been properly removed; approval of the exposed subgrade in areas to receive fill and in areas where excavation has resulted in the desired finished grade and designate areas of overexcavation; and performance of field compaction tests to determine relative compaction achieved during fill placement. In addition, all foundation excavations shall be observed by the Soils Engineering firm to confirm that appropriate bearing materials are present at the design grades and recommend any modifications to construct footings. NorCal Engineering Project Number 7101-97 (In order of appearance) x A - LogptZeSf+rcavabow Test Excavations 1-10 OntON Tests Table I - Maximum Density Tests Table II - Expansion Index Tests Table 111 - Sulfate Tests Plate A - Direct Shear Tests Plate B - Consolidation Tests NorCal Engineering IMATE . D EXF - Project Number 7101-97 APPENDIX A NorCal Engineering NorCaI Engineering om AND GEOTEECHMCAL CONSULTAhTS PllDn I mllt WIFIED SOIL CLASSIFIUTI~ SYsm 2. i$ a'- - 14. 12. 8. s 10. 109. 105. 106.# 107.! F E __ Canpacted Fill Soils CLAYS, sandy silty clays, lmse and wet in upper 1.5' stiff below Native Soils Clay sandy with rock and shale fragnents silty,grey to dark brm, medim stiff to stiff, diatamceous DATE DRILLD): 11-14-97 Bulk *le WUIRUtr USED: Extension Backhoe -MER LML:None Encountered a Jar -18 NorCal Engineering > ID'S OF TEST EC" #I 3ILS AMI GEOTECHMCAL CONSULTANTS , .. , .I I, *. \ 1 1 Carpacted Fill Soils CLAYS and sandy. silty clays loose and wet in up& 1.5' stiff belcnv Native Soils Clay sandy with rock and shale frayements silty, grey to dark brawn, medim stiff to stiff, diatmceous i AT 1 canpacted Fill soils CIAYS and sandy, silty clays, loose and wet in upper 2.0 stiff below Native Soils Clay sandy with rock and shale fra-ts silty, grey to dikk brm, medium stiff to stiff, diatamaceous ME DRIUED: 11-14-97 a Bulk ala EqUIRWr UaD: Extended Backhoe Spoon a Jar -14 grrmmUTuI LML: None Encountered NorCal Engineering ICG OF TEST BC&=CkJ #3 OILS AND GEOTECHMCAL CONSULTANTS QlvI I MTE , I" /I .. Surficial Fill Soils Sandy, silty clays, loose and wet Native Soils Clay sandy with rodc and shale frawts silty; grey to dark bmwn, medium stiff to stiff, diatmdeous SILTSTONE Grey, stiff damp to mist ME DRXUm: 11-14-97 EpuImEmT uap: Extended Backhoe ~uIt -1. Jar -la WLUITER LML: None Encountered NorCal Engineering LCG OF TEST EIOCRVATICEI # 4 OCU AND CEolEcHKIcAL CONSULTANTS I MlE 1 I- IO 15 Surficial Fill Soils Sandy, silty clays, loose and wet Native Soils Clay sandy with rock and shale fragnents silty, grey to dark brown, stiff and mist ME DRILLED: 11-14-97 NorCal Engineering ILX; OF TEST EG%WWION # 5 OaS AND GEOTEQHMCAL CONSULTANTS - 1 a' - 13.7 11.5 . 3 g, - 105.5 104.t I I Native Soils Clay sandy with rock and shale fragments silty, grey to dark brawn, dun stiff to stiff belaw upper 1.0, diataMceous . SILTSTONE Grey stiff and dap ME 0U-z 1 1-1 4-97 EpUIRUrr USED:Extended Backhoe MCT [ Mlli I .. i\ 1 1 Ccnpcted Fill Soils CL?iYS, sandy silty clays, loose and wet in upper 1.5 stiff belaw Native Soils Clay sandy with rock and shale fragments silty, qrey to dark brawn, mediian stiff to stiff, diatanaceous DATE DRILLED: 11-14-97 Standard Split Spoon El Ring -10 a Jar -10 6RouIQIyI;TER W: None Encountered E. 2: .a NorCal Engineering I I 115. - canpacted Fill Soils CLAYS, sandy silty clays, loose and wet in upper 1.5 stiff helm Native Soils Clay-sandy with rock and shale fragments silty, grey to dark brawn, dm stiff to stiff, diatumcems C IbckCorr Bulk -la €QUI- USED: mended Backhoe S Standard split Spoon ma: None Encountered a Jar -la i Rfng -1. NorCal Engineering UX; OF TEST m"Im 18 ;OILS AND GEolECHMCAL CONSULTANTS MCT I ME - 3 a' - 12.8 13.4 9.7 . is z= - 107. f 109: 105.1 carpacted Fill Soils CIAYS, sandy silty clays, loose and wet in upper 1.5 stiff belaw NorCal Engineering I - 3 a' - 9.7 I 108.6 Canpacted Fill Soils CLAYS, sandy silty clays, loose and wet in upper 1.5 stiff below MTE ORXLLDD: 11-14-97 BU~L -le EQUIRucr Umr: Extended Backhoe %lit Spoon a Jar -le LEVEL: None Encountered NorCal Engineering ICG OF TEST -VATIm # 10 ;OILS AND GE(YIEC"ICAL CONSULTANTS Project Number 7101-97 NorCal Engineering .*,I. 5 .. December 5.1997 Page 15 saQQ!!2 T6 @ 3-5' Siltstone TI @ 0-2' CLAY. silty T9 @ 0-2' CLAY. sandy silt Optimum rdQL5hU 16.0 15.5 13.0 sQult= T6 @ 3-5' T1 @O-2' T9 @ 0-2' EiimIQk T6 @ 3-5' T1 @ 0-2' T9 @ 0-2' Project Number 7101-97 Classification Siltstone CLAY, silty CLAY, sandy silt Maximum Dry 111.0 109.5 115.0 Expansion llJ!kx 87 66 54 p 540 268 374 NorCal Engineering .. DRY msnm LIQUID DEPTH DWSITY CoI(N(T LIMIT sm mR (En) (PCF) (2) ( 2) X 1 5.0 105.1 17.7 A 6 10.0 104.6 11.5 0 9 12.5 105.4 9.7 0 3 2.5 107.4 a. a -2 USTICITY INDEX ( 2) 0 2 6 8 10 COIISOLIDATIOII TEST RESULTS NorCal Engineering ;OILS AND GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS ..I ,. - * -. I ,. .t ::: ............ .C'.'!... ............ ; ......... .... ................... .. .:.:iT,.,.: . 2500 ........ ... ......................... ....... ....... ,. ..I ............................. .: .! ;. ..... ! , .... ........ ...................... .... ... __ .- ... - ........ .. ... .. .. ...... - ...... ........ .. .. ... .. .... ...... ... 1500 IO00 500 0 . _- .--- _-.- I I I I I I -I 0 500 loo0 1500 2wo .. -- - NOfWi. STES.5 (PSF) DRY loISNRE smOL BORING DEPTH 0 DENSITY ca"i-r c MUBER (FEET) (DEGREES) (PSF) (pcF) X 1 2.5 23 450 109.6 14.6 0 6 3.0 19 375 105.9 13.7 A 9 3.5 26 325 107.6 12.8 I Dl 1 I I I I I NOTE: TESTS PERFOFNO ON SATURATED SAMPLES UNLESS SHOWN BELOW. (FM) FIELD HOISTURE TESTS PERFORMED ON UNDISTURBED SAMPLES UNLESS SHOWN BELOW. (R) SAWPLES REmKDEO AT 90% OF WXIMUM DRY DENSITY NorCal Engineering I SOILS AND GEOTECHNICL CONSULTAmS, DIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS PROJECT I DATE 1 P. 04 JAN-21-99 THU 08:03 CITY OF CARLSBAD COMM DE FAX NO. 4380894 NON-RESIDENTIAL CERTIFICATE I ! '.! i ! ! ::: i I .. i .# ! .. ,. ,i ! ! i .. . 4 -6