Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1830 CANYON PL; ; CB910294; PermitBUILDING PERMIT 08/05/91 08:53 Page 1 of 1 Job Address: 1830 CANYON PL Permit Type: SINGLE FAMILY DWLNG - DETACHED Parcel No: 205-080-85-00 Valuation: 227,116 Construction Type: VN Occupancy Group: R3 Str Permit No: CB910294 Project No: A9100364 Development No: Fl: Ste: 3816 08/05/91 0001 01 02 C-PRHT 13585.00 CK Class Code Description: 2896 SF SFD, GAR 748 SF Appl/Ownr CARLSBAD CANYON PLACE LTD 7720 EL CAMINO REAL CARLSBAD, CA 92009 6368072 Status: Applied: Apr/Issue: Validated By: ISSUED 02/25/91 08/05/91 CD CONTRACTOR : GOLEY AND KEM^B|t|it 7720 EL CAMjtHCr ~x\ErfjPLL «WP§^ "TjT, * ^^ /s«i3/"'ADT CDAPi /*«* ^*5^tffcQ ~ *. O «*JraCAKlibBAL) , UI1 jpZOvy *( £f ;J|fl *** Fees Required **#f , **f ?*!/" Fees: 14§f3Jt2-» Q® Adjustments: »®0 Total Fees: li, Si2rQO Fee description Building Permit Plan Check Strong Motion Fee Enter 'Y' to Autocall P.P.JP, > F.M.F./G.M.F. and Zo«L«(.aid )_•%., > Enter 'Y' to Autocalc fM^fc'- "' ,- > V NO ^ ^ ^v " "^-"*~.. c. ", ?-S[^,i" ,••*•*" "k;v'£*4,- 6328052 OflXiiMbkd & Credits *** *•« - . ? <****£* +" -i -," fd?; . ±fJLJt'> ,, Total ^otc»i; -yayri^@ii^4"F4"" Balance ~'|^OT*J"«' 1 Units -' f" •:l%- .** ,,5|f -s-Ip' . 00 727.00 3,585 .00 Ext fee Data 1088. 00 707 . 00 16. 00 7949.00 Y 01 600. 00 Y Enter Number of EDU ' s ; ~ ^ -\ or manually enter M.F.F. , "1* * "i7<^«ms Or Enter Park-in-Lieu Fee -4-*|>A|P^y * BUILDING TOTAL , 'tf&if*xtr ^s AEnter "Y" for Plumbing Issue Fee >* Each Plumbing Fixture or Trap > Each Building Sewer > Each Install/Repair Water Line > Each Water Heater and/or Vent > Gas Piping System > Each Vacuum Breaker > * PLUMBING TOTAL Enter "Y" for Electric Issue Fee > Single Phase Per AMP > * ELECTRICAL TOTAL ($10 Minimum) Enter 'Y' for Mechanical Issue Fee> Install Furn/Ducts > Each Install/Reloc Appliance Vent > Each Hood/Fireplace }*"" * MECHANICAL TOTAL CITY OF C 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Caiisbz *+i -/lllf*" 16 2.50 1 6. 50 1 2. 50 1 2. 50 1 2. 50 2 2. 50 200 .25 1 9.00 4 4.50 2 6.50 /WiUPPROVAL BBR^on DATE^l ttBMANCE 2200. 00 1575.00 01 14135. 00 7. 50 Y 40. 00 6. 50 2. 50 2. 50 2. 50 5.00 67.00 5.00 Y 50. 00 55.00 15.00 Y 9. 00 18. 00 13 . 00 7 fa MMMMMHM PERMIT APPLICATION City of Carlsbad Building Department 2075 Las Pal mas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (eis) 438-nsi 1. PERMIT TYPE A - Q COMMERCIAL QNEW pTENANT IMPROVEMENT B - Q INDUSTRIAL QlEW QTENANT IMPROVEMENT c - ^RESIDENTIAL QAPARTMENT nc°ND° ^INGLE FAMILY DWELLING n*i">iTioN/ALTERATioN DDUPLEX QOEMOLITION ORELOCATION IMMOBILE HOME QELECTRICAL DMECHANICAL OPOOL QSPA DETAINING WALL DSOLAR 2. PROJECT INFORMATION PLAN CHECK No Address Nearest Cross Streets WO FOR OFFICE USE ONLY LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot No. L.r>r Subdivision Name/Number Phase No. CHECKBEJ.OU IF SUBMITTED: .Q2 Energy Calcs _ Q2 Structural Caics Soils Report _ D1 Addressed Envelope ASSESSOR'S PARCEL EXISTING USE PROPOSED USE BLDG. SO. FTG.* OF STORIES CONTACT PERSON ADDRESS ZIP CODE z/-f DAY TELEPHONE AGENT FOR CONTRACTOR QOWNER ADDRESS '^f-'f-'Z-O D AGENT FOR OWNER STATE ZIP COPE DAY TELEPHONE 2- ~ 5.OWNER NAME CITY OWNERD.LT STATE ADDRESS ZIP COPE DLESSEE nTENANT DAY TELEPHONE 6' CITY SIGNATURE DESIGNER NAME CITY i-nlt&e STATE ADDRESS ZIP CODE STATE LIC. f Z.00f LICENSE CLASS P TITLE DAY TELEPHONE CITY BUSINESS LIC. # DATE CODE 5- ^_ (T-e. DAY TELEPHONE ^2. 3 ~STATE LIC. «, WORKERS' COMPENSATIONWorkers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm that I have a certificate of consent to self-insure issued by the Director of Industrial Relations, or a certificate of Workers' Compensation Insurance by an admitted insurer, or an exact copy or duplicate thereof certified by the Director of the insurer thereof filed with the Building Inspection Department (Section 3800, Lab. C). INSURANCE COMPANY POLICY NO.EXPIRATION DATE Certificate of Exemption: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. SIGNATURE 8. OWN ErT-BUILDER D Owner-Builder Declaration:I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: I as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon,, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale.). I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) Licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason: (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish, or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (Chapter 9, commencing with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars [$500]). SIGNATURE DATE COMPLETE THIS SECTION FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMITS ONLY: Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? DYES QNO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? DYES QNO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? DYES Q] NO IF AMY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED AFTER JULY 1, 1989 UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. 9. CONSTRUCTION LENDING AGENCY I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec 3097(i) Civil Code). LENDER'S NAME \Q S ADDRESS 10. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE _ , __ I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the City of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY MAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. Expiration. Every permit issued by the Building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended any time after he work is commenced for a period of 180 days (Section 303(d) Uniform Building Code).or aband gj_OWNER ^CONTRACTOR Q BY PHONE APPROVED BY; DATE: ' WHITE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION DEPT: BUILDING ENGINEERING FIRE PLANNING U/M WATER PLAN CHECK*: CB910294 DATE: 03/04/92 PERMIT#: CB910294 PERMIT TYPE: SFD PROJECT NAME: 2896 SF SFD, GAR 748 SF ADDRESS: 1830 CANYON4>L CONTACT PERSON/PHONE*: MH/MIKE/632-8032 SEWER DIST: CA WATER DIST: CA INSPECTED , BY: /// 'pc/^ INSPECTED BY: INSPECTED BY: COMMENTS : / / . DATE /// ^W>%^- INSPECTED: 3/^13 (/ f ' ' DATE INSPECTED: DATE INSPECTED: ^ APPROVED Y^- DISAPPROVED APPROVED , DISAPPROVED \ APPROVED DISAPPROVED DEPT: BUILDING FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION ENGINEERING FIRE PLANNING U/M PLAN CHECK#: CB910294 PERMIT^: CB910294 PROJECT NAME: 2896 SF SFD, GAR 748 SF WATER DATE: 03/04/92 PERMIT TYPE: SFD ADDRESS: 1830 CANYON PL CONTACT PERSON/PHONEtf: MH/MIKE/632-8032 SEWER DIST: CA WATER DIST: CA INSPECTED BY: INSPECTED BY: INSPECTED BY: DATE INSPECTED: DATE INSPECTED: DATE INSPECTED: APPROVED APPROVED APPROVED DISAPPROVED DISAPPROVED DISAPPROVED FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION DEPT: BUILDING ENGINEERING FIRE PLANNING U/M WATER PLAN CHECK#: CB910294 DATE: 03/04/92 PERMIT^: CB910294 PERMIT TYPE: SFD PROJECT NAME: 2896 SF SFD, GAR 748 SF ADDRESS: 1830 CANYON PL CONTACT PERSON/PHONE#: MH/MIKE/632-8032 SEWER DIST: CA WATER DIST: CA INSPECTED ^XYl DATE BY: / KJ/^x INSPECTED ^//-yy^ APPROVED V DISAPPROVED INSPECTED DATE BY: INSPECTED: APPROVED DISAPPROVED INSPECTED DATE BY: INSPECTED: APPROVED DISAPPROVED COMMENTS: .,, FINAL .BUILDING INSPECTION DEPT: BUILDING ENGINEERING FIRE PLANNING U/M WATER PLAN CHECK#: CB910294 DATE: 03/04/92 PERMITS: CB910294 PERMIT TYPE: SFD PROJECT NAME: 2896 SF SFD, GAR 748 SF ADDRESS: 1830 CANYON PL CONTACT PERSON/PHONE#: MH/MIKE/632-8032 SEWER DIST: CA WATER DIST: CA INSPECTED 7"5?\Yl DATE BY: jL-&yv<~^ INSPECTED: ^'^'Y^ APPROVED DISAPPROVED INSPECTED DATE BY: INSPECTED: APPROVED DISAPPROVED INSPECTED DATE BY: INSPECTED: APPROVED DISAPPROVED _/ COMMENTS: CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT* CB910294 FOR 03/16/92 DESCRIPTION: 2896 SF SFD, GAR 748 SF TYPE: SFD JOB ADDRESS: 1830 CANYON PL APPLICANT: CARLSBAD CANYON PLACE LTD CONTRACTOR: GOLEY AND KEMMERLY HOMES OWNER: REMARKS: RES/PD SPECIAL INSTRUCT: STR: PHONE: 6368072 PHONE: 6328052 PHONE: INSPECTO: INSPECTOR AREA PD PLANCK# CB910294 OCC GRP R3 CONSTR. TYPE VN FL: STE: TOTAL TIME: —RELATED PERMITS—PERMIT# TYPE STATUS SE910052 SWRSD ISSUED CD LVL DESCRIPTION 19 ST Final Structural 29 PL Final Plumbing 39 EL Final Electrical 49 ME Final Mechanical ACT., COMMENTS ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION 031392 Final Combo 030492 Final Combo 120691 Interior Lath/Drywall 120391 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 112691 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 112691 Rough Combo 112191 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 111991 Shear Panels/HD's 111991 Rough Combo 111491 Shear Panels/HD's 111391 Shear Panels/HD's 110691 Roof/Reroof 103191 Roof/Reroof 103191 Exterior Lath/Drywall 102291 Shear Panels/HD's 102291 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 092491 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 091991 Underground/Under Floor 091991 Sewer/Water Service 091391 Footing 091091 Grout 090591 Footing ACT CA CO AP AP PA AP NS CO CO AP CO AP CO CO PA PA AP AP AP AP AP AP INSP PD PD PD PD PK PD PD PD PD PD PD PD PD PD PD PD PD PD PD PD PD PD COMMENTS RES TO 03/16/92 RESCHEDULE SEE NOTES GROUT 2ND LIFT 1ST LIFT RET & RESTR WALL FTGS CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT* CB910294 FOR 11/26/91 DESCRIPTION: 2896 SF SFD, GAR 748 SF TYPE: SFD JOB ADDRESS: 1830 CANYON PL APPLICANT: CARLSBAD CANYON PLACE LTD CONTRACTOR: GOLEY AND KEMMERLY HOMES OWNER: REMARKS: MH/MIKE/632-8032 _ SPECIAL INSTRUCT: CAN YOU MEET HIM AT 9:00 AM AT JOBSITE? IF NOT PLEASE CALL. STR: PHONE: 6368072 PHONE: 6328052 /°| PHONE: INSPECTOR INSPECTOR AREA PD PLANCK* CB910294 OCC GRP R3 CONSTR. TYPE VN FL: STE: TOTAL TIME: —RELATED PERMITS—PERMIT* TYPE STATUS CD 14 SE910052 SWRSD ISSUED LVL DESCRIPTION ACT COMMENTS ST Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION 112191 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 111991 Shear Panels/HD's 111991 Rough Combo 111491 Shear Panels/HD's 111391 Shear Panels/HD's 110691 Roof/Reroof 103191 Roof/Reroof 103191 Exterior Lath/Drywall 102291 Shear Panels/HD's 102291 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 092491 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 091991 Underground/Under Floor 091991 Sewer/Water Service 091391 Footing 091091 Grout 190591 Footing ACT NS CO CO AP CO AP CO CO PA PA AP AP AP AP AP AP INSP PD PD PD PD PD PD PD PD PD PD PD PD PD PD PD PD COMMENTS GROUT 2ND LIFT 1ST LIFT RET & RESTR WALL FTGS ADDRESS: & "%&," •/•*••**"-'"'•*«S!>"J'--i' --'-' VS-'^-N i'f'-!- Cfl tJD fj D APPROVED PLANS SHALL BE ON JOB SITE BUILDING —-i-^ D FOUNDATION 1 O REINFORCING STEEL D MASONRY 0 GROUT-GUNITE D FLOOR AND CEILING FRAME'V) D SHEATHING t~" D FRAME D EXTERIOR LATH D INSULATION D INTERIOR LATH OR DRYWALL PLUMBING D UNDERGROUND PLUMBING D UNDERGROUND WATER a ROUGH PLUMBING D r>6 D tUB OR SHOWER PAN T3 WATER HEATER ELECTRICAL D TEMPORARY SERVICE D ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND D ROUGH ELECTRIC D POOL BONDING D ELECTRIC SERVICE D UFER GROUND D G.F.I. D SMOKE DETECTOR .a'^K^r^f'iitaKtfiiaiiiJtii^^ MISCELLANEOUS D PLENUM AND DUCTS D COMBUSTION AIR D CONDITIONED AIR SYSTEMS Q SOLAR. -—:--_:/ Q POOL I, '" ' ' &£ . ' 7 . ' D PATIO ' ' - • IS -" -f D SIGN • . ''':"' D OTHER r - v i f ' TIME: ' ! I A ,:';'/• / ,-' : ; DATE- '/* /'/ ' // . '-• .'; . ,4 .f.^ '•!tMSPEHTOR ) . *• CITY OF CARLSBAD BUItD»NG TNSPCCTJON DEPARTWtNT PHONE - 438-3550 >4r •>»* or «••••* 4» •>•>•• «> «v«»«#«>«Br«««^ <•<••• «••«•• D APPROVED PLANS SHALL BE ON JOB SITE BUILDING D FOUNDATION D RBNFORGING D MASONRY D GROUT-GUNITE a FLOOR AND CEILING FRAME D SHEATHING D FRAME D EXTERIOR LATH D INSULATION D INTERIOR LATH OR DRYWALL /-A D- •>*«P'8!SW^f?^^^*"'?s"'M?r'?!'*''' D UNDERGROUND PLUMBING D UNDERGROUND WATER D ROUGH PLUMBING D TOP OUT PLUMBING D SEWER AND PUCO. D TUB OR SHOWER PAN D GAS TEST D WATER HEATER ELECTWCAL D TEMPORARY S|RViCE D ELECTRIC UNDERGR6UND D ROUGH ELECTRIC D POOL BONDING D ELECTRIC SERVICE D UFER GROUND D G.F.I. D SMOKE DETECTOR MISCELLANEOUS D PLENUM AND DUCTS D COMBUSTION AIR D CONDITIONED AIR SYSTEMS D SOLAR D GRADING D POOL D PATIO D SIGN x D OTHER ***aii**4^ TIME: DATE: //, ,- // /* 31'J 'II .«.5-« INSPECTOR CITY OF CARLSBAD PHONE - 438^550 f*&s-r~-"*£'•"••?*':'"'"- !Vb,«-^-vr-'/te(«-*-;*fr*^(s»«'s*«''s. 'Ufiyk^,, ... .,..„: ,,, ~,,^ • «l'W.«'«><««««^«> «••.«*,»» *»•«•««•••••••! DATE UNSCHEDULED INSPECTION INSPECTOR TIME ARRIVE:TIME LEAVE: CD LVL DESCRIPTION ACT COMMENTS <*0U CsOZTlt— PERMITS 6/15/89 CATLIN ENGINEERING, INC. P. O. Box 4225 La Mesa, CA 92044-0970 (6I9) 588-8500 DATE SUBJECT Feoll TO: P! ; ~1 J MEMO LETTER FORM 1157 THE BUSINESS BOOK, Oshkosh. Wl 54906 1-800-558-0220 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & TESTING, INC. 6280 RIVERDALE STREET, P.O. BOX 600627, SAN DIEGO, CA. 92160 (619) 280-4321 747 ENTERPRISE STREET, ESCONDEDO, CA. 92025, (619) 746-4544 COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST REPORT FILE NUMBER 9112240 PROJECT TITLE Canyon Place PROJECT LOCATION 1830 Canyon Place ARCHITECT Archi Tekton ENGINEER CONTRACTOR Galey DATE: Sept. 17, 1991 LJ CONCRETE (ASTM C39) D MORTAR (UBC 24-22) 50 GROUT (ASTM C101 9) D PRISMS (ASTM £447) n PLAN FILE No. PERMIT No. LOCATION IN STRUCTURE North end of residence, 1st lift cantilever retaining wall MATERIAL SUPPLIER ADMIXTURE(S) MIX DESIGNATION TIME IN MIXER, MINUTES SLUMP, INCHES Palomar Transit Mix C564EWP4/ 6 sack 100 7 SAMPLES FABRICATED BY MS SAMPLES TESTED BY DRB TRUCK No. 890105 TICKET No. 622880 LABORATORY No. MARK 4956 4957 4958 DATE MADE DATE RECEIVED DATE TESTED DIAMETER, INCHES AREA, SQUARE INCHES MAXIMUM LOAD, LBS COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH, PSI AGE TESTED, DAYS REQUIRED 28 DAY STRENGTH, PSI UNIT WT./CU. FT. (PLASTIC) 9-10-91 9-12-91 9-17-91 9.20 25,000 2,720 7 2,000 10-08-91 9.20 38,250 4,160 28 10-08-91 9.51 40,500 4,260 28 Klttft RECEIVED PuMing Department DISTRIBUTION (3) Qaley & Kemmerly Homes (1) City of Carlsbad SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & TESTING, INC. REVIEWED BY: Michael B. Wheeler, R.C.E. #45358 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & TESTING, INC. 6280 RTVERDALE STREET, P.O. BOX 600627, SAN DIEGO, CA. 92160 (619) 280-4321 747 ENTERPRISE STREET, ESCONDIDO, CA. 92025, (619) 746-4544 COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST REPORT FILE NUMBER 9112240 PROJECT TITLE Canyon Place PROJECT LOCATION 1830 Canyon Place ARCHITECT Archi Tekton ENGINEER CONTRACTOR Galey & Kemmery DATE: Sept. 16, 1991 Q CONCRETE (ASTM C39) ffl MORTAR (UBC 24-22) n GROUT (ASTM C1019) D PRISMS (ASTM E447) PERMIT No. PLAN FILE No. LOCATION IN STRUCTURE MATERIAL SUPPLIER ADMIXTURE(S) MIX DESIGNATION TIME IN MIXER, MINUTES SLUMP, INCHES SAMPLES FABRICATED BY SAMPLES TESTED BY Foundation level, 1st lift of cantilever wall - 12" block Chemstar Lime Type S Michael Saunders DRB TRUCK No.TICKET No. LABORATORY No. MARK 4953 4954 4955 DATE MADE DATE RECEIVED DATE TESTED DIAMETER, INCHES AREA, SQUARE INCHES MAXIMUM LOAD, LBS COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH, PSI AGE TESTED, DAYS REQUIRED 28 DAY STRENGTH, PSI UNIT WT./CU. FT. (PLASTIC) 9-09-91 9-12-91 9-16-91 2.00 3.14 7,100 2,260 7 1,800 10-07-91 10,150 3,230 28 10-07-91 11,100 3,530 28 DISTRIBUTION (3) Galey & Kemmerly Homes (1) City of Carlsbad SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & TESTING, INC. REVIEWED BY: Michael B. Wheeler, R.C.E. 45358 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & TESTING, INC. 6280 RIVERDALE STREET, P.O. BOX 600627, SAN DIEGO, CA. 92160 (619) 280-4321 747 ENTERPRISE STREET, ESCONDIDO, CA. 92025, (619) 746-4544 COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST REPORT FILE NUMBER 9112240 PROJECT TITLE Canyon Place PROJECT LOCATION 1830 Canyon Place ARCHITECT Archi Tekton ENGINEER CONTRACTOR Galey & Remmery DATE: Sept. 16, 1991 PERMIT No. PLAN FILE No. CONCRETE (ASTM C39) MORTAR (UBC 24-22) GROUT (ASTM C1 01 9) PRISMS {ASTM E447) a LOCATION IN STRUCTURE MATERIAL SUPPLIER ADMIXTURE(S) MIX DESIGNATION TIME IN MIXER, MINUTES SLUMP, INCHES SAMPLES FABRICATED BY SAMPLES TESTED BY Foundation level, 1st lift of cantilever wall - 12" block Chemstar Lime Type S Michael Saunders DRB TRUCK No.TICKET No. LABORATORY No. MARK 4953 4954 4955 DATE MADE DATE RECEIVED DATE TESTED DIAMETER, INCHES AREA, SQUARE INCHES MAXIMUM LOAD. LBS COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH, PSI AGE TESTED, DAYS REQUIRED 28 DAY STRENGTH, PSI UNIT WT./CU. FT. (PLASTIC) 9-09-91 9-12-91 9-16-91 2.00 3.14 7,100 2,260 7 1,800 DISTRIBUTION (3) Qaley & Kemmerly Homes (1) City of Carlsbad SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & TESTING, INC. REVIEWED BY: Michael B. Wheeler, R.C.E. 45358 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & TESTING, INC. 6280 RIVERDALE STREET, P.O. BOX 600627 SAN DIEGO, Ca. 92160, Phone (619) 280-4321 747 ENTERPRISE STREET, ESCONDIDO. Ca. 92029, Phone (619) 746-4544 FIELD INSPECTOR REPORT PROJECT TITLE Canyon Place PROJECT LOCATION 1830 Canyon Place ARCHITECT Archi Tekton GENERAL CONTRACTOR Galery SCS&TRLENo. 9112240 I.R. No. 1 PERMIT No. 91-0294 PLAN FILE No. ENGINEER Patrick Taylor SUB CONTRACTOR Fleetwood Joyner 9/9/91 M. G. Saunders 452 9/10/91 M. G. Saunders 452 Time Arrived: 1100 Time Departed: 1430 Reinforced Masonry Structural Steel; ASTM A615, Grade 60 Inspected the laying-up of reinforced, grouted structural masonry as outlined below. Mason was observed for proper high-lift procedures and techniques as noted on the approved plans. Inspected the laying-up of 12" block at the north end of the residence per detail "3" on sheet A1.3, cantilever retaining wall. Inspected mortar for proper mixing and handling. Set of three test samples taken. Inspected the reinforcing steel for size, grade, lap, location and clearance. Work inspected appeared to be in accordance with the approved plans and specification unless noted otherwise. *NOTE: (Non conformance) 2x4 shear key not formed in footing of cantilever retaining wall. Informed owner and masonry forman. Time Arrived: 1030 Time Departed: 1430 Reinforced Masonry Inspected grout space immediately prior to closing of cleanouts for clean-up and clearances. Inspected the placement and consolidation of approximately 9.5 cubic yards of grout for the 1 st lift of cantilever retaining wall at the north end of the residence. Consolidation by mechanical vibrator. One set of three grout samples taken. Work inspected appears to be in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. DISTRIBUTION: (3) Galey & Kemmerly Homes (1) City of Carlsbad SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & TESTING, INC. REVIEWED BY: SAVED FILE*, REPORT t 2240 James E. Oliverson SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & TESTING, INC, 6280 RTVERDALE STREET, P.O. BOX 600627, SAN DIEGO, CA. 92160 (619) 280-4321 747 ENTERPRISE STREET, ESCONDIDO, CA. 92025, (619) 74^4544 COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST REPORT FILE NUMBER 9112240 PROJECT TITLE Canyon Place PROJECT LOCATION 1830 Canyon Place ARCHITECT Archi Tekton ENGINEER CONTRACTOR Galey DATE: Sept. 17, 1991 PERMIT No. PLAN FILE No. a CONCRETE (ASTM C39) D MORTAR (UBC 24-22} H GROUT (ASTM C1 01 9) D PRISMS (ASTM E447) a LOCATION IN STRUCTURE North end of residence, 1st lift cantilever retaining wall MATERIAL SUPPLIER AOMIXTURE(S) MIX DESIGNATION TIME IN MIXER, MINUTES SLUMP, INCHES Palomar Transit Mix C564EWP4/ 6 sack 100 7 SAMPLES FABRICATED BY MS SAMPLES TESTED BY DRB TRUCK No. 890105 TICKET No. 622880 LABORATORY No. MARK 4956 4957 4958 DATE MADE DATE RECEIVED DATE TESTED DIAMETER, INCHES AREA, SQUARE INCHES MAXIMUM LOAD, LBS COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH, PSI AGE TESTED, DAYS REQUIRED 28 DAY STRENGTH, PSI UNIT WT./CU. FT. (PLASTIC) 9-10-91 9-12-91 9-17-91 9.20 25,000 2,720 7 2,000 DISTRIBUTION (3) Galey & Kemmerly Homes (1) City of Carlsbad SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & TESTING, INC. REVIEWED BY: Michael B. Wheeler, R.C.E. #45358 ESGIL CORPORATION 932O CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 2O8 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) 56O-1468 DATE: JURISDICTION: PLAN CHECK NO: PROJECT NAME; SET; PROJECT ADDRESS; }e&sO ]APPLICANT jDICTIOl PLAN CHECKER FILE COPY DUPS JDESIGNER D D D D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficien- cies identified _ are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corp. until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to return to the applicant contact person. { | The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil staff did not advise the applicant contact person that plan check has been completed. j1 Esgil staff did advise applicant that the plan check has — been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted:_ (~~j REMARKS: Telephone # Enclosures: SGIL CORPORATION ESGIL CORPORATION 932O CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 2O8 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) 560-1468 DATE: <£- / 2>- *? / _ HAgPLICANT ___ gTj"uRISDICTIOl£> JURISDICTION: CtT^I op C*?jg£ S/gKfrO _ QPLAN CHECKER ~~ QFILE COPY PLAN CHECK NO: <? < - 2. *? 4- _ SET; .///_ _ QUPS QDESIGNER PROJECT ADDRESS; 1 8"*>O PROJECT NAME; -SFD po <g. D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficien- cies identified _ are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corp. until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to return to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil staff did not advise the applicant contact person that plan check has been completed. I I Esgil staff did advise applicant that the plan check has — been completed. Person contacted: _ Date contacted: Telephone #_ REMARKS: By; #g£ D^l/gVJTET _ Enclosures: ESGIL CORPORATION ^-° DGA DAA DRN Q DM .-niRlSDICTION;_Date plans received by plan checker:. PLAN CHECK NO.; PROJECT ADDRESS; TQ. 9 / -Date plan recheck completed;By; /frge? /«?$£> RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION SHEET FOREWORD; PLEASE READ Plan check is limited to technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. The plan check is based on regulations enforced by the Building Inspection Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The items shown below need clarification, modification or change. All items have to be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 303(c), of the Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. A. PLANS ©1.) Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints, and any original plan sets that may have been returned to you by the jurisdiction, to: To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this check sheet with the revised plans. 3.) The following items have not been resolved from previous plan reviews. The original correction number has been given for your reference. In case you did not keep a copy of the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the still outstanding corrections. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please check. Yes No OF- ro To WTtj- TO Form No. RPCS.41290 ESGIL CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) 56O-1468 DATE:'HA P JURISDICTION: ClT^p_ PLAN CHECK NO: 9/ NT T CHECKER SET:IL [JFILE COPY HUPS """"DESIGNER PROJECT ADDRESS; / g *> O PROJECT NAME; Sf^D F&tZ. D a D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficien- cies identified are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corp. until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to return to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: ~l~72.0 : - _ Esgil staff did not advise the applicant contact person that plan check has been completed. I j Esgil staff did advise applicant that the plan check has — ' been completed. Person contacted: _ Date contacted: REMARKS: Telephone #_ stte-^rs A 7.I •( to ' By:ESGIL CORPORATION GGA GAA QRN Q Enclosures -SOIL** JURISDICTION; CM IZL <> K> f?_Date plans received by plan checker:."' ' PLAN CHECK NO.:_ PROJECT ADDRESS:. TO: 9/~_Date plan recheck completed:_ /<?3£> RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION SHEET FOREWORD; PLEASE READ Plan check is limited to technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. The plan check is based on regulations enforced by the Building Inspection Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The items shown below need clarification, modification or change. All items have to be satisfied before the plans will be in conf ormance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 303(c), of the Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. A. PLANS © © Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints, and any original plan sets that may have been returned to you by the jurisdiction, to: Oh) To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this check sheet with the revised plans. The following items have not been resolved from previous plan reviews. The original correction number has been given for your reference. In case you did not keep a copy of the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the still outstanding corrections. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items. \ Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please check. Yes No \T&M 4- -5"HI I op Ll5>T C ffJT. of- Form No. RPCS.41290 a- (T /^srs y! r=-a0T/fii& } . srrtz-i 15*73 E> iiJ fra,c.c?eLptfti^& WITH- TH^ (JLF3<L TO QtJ /S M&T^ Sg^F /» TTA-O hfcD or gs^/6 Og^-Pgpt/^r/^/J . /^-T &tf) £~bo —/g, & g ©Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints, and any original plan sets that may have been returned to you by the jurisdiction, to: Esgil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite #208, San Diego, California 92123, (619) 560-U68. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints, and any original plan sets that may have been returned to you by the jurisdiction, to: y The jurisdiction's building department. Indicate on the'Title Sheet of the plans, the name of the legal owner and name of person responsible for the preparation of the plans. Section 302(a)7. All sheets of plans must be signed by the person responsible for their preparation. (California Business and Professions Code). Plans, specifications and calculations shall be signed by the California state licensed engineer or architect responsible for their preparation, for plans deviating from conventional wood frame construction. Specify expiration date of license. (California Business and Professions Code). Specify on the Title Sheet of the plans the gross floor area of each element of this project including dwelling, garage, carport, >patio, deck and balcony. Section 302(d). Provide a ' statement on the Title Sheet of the plans that this project shall comply with Title24 and 1988 UBC. UHC and UPC and 1987 NEC. Submit fully dimensioned plot plan drawn to scale showing location, size, and use of all existing and proposed structures on the lot. Identify property lines and show lot dimensions and all easements. Show location of all cut or fill slopes. Show finish floor elevations and show elevations of adjacent finish grade. Show drainage patterns with minimum slopes. Section 302(d). Indicate distance from property lines to proposed building. Section 302(d). Show on the title sheet all structures, pools, walls, etc. included under this application. Any portion of the project shown on the site plan that is not included with the building permit application filed should be clearly identified as "not included." Clearly show if the lower level is a basement or a story, based on the definitions in Sections 403 and A20. Plot the finish grade (as defined) on the elevations and dimension the distance to the floor above, for story determination. On the cover sheet of the plans, specify any items requiring special inspection, by way of the following: REQUIRED SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS In addition to the regular inspections, the following checked items will also require Special Inspection in accordance with Sec 306 of the Uniform Building Code. ITEM REQ. IF CHECKED REMARKS SOILS COMPLIANCE PRIOR TO FOUNDATION IKSP. STRUCTURAL CONCRETE OVER 2500 PSI PRESTRESSED STEEL FIELD WELDING HIGH STRENGTH BOLTS EXPANSION ANCHORS SPECIAL MASONRY SPRAYED ON FIRE PROOFING PILES/CAISSONS DESIGNER-SPECIFIED OTHER FIRE JWItXXLOW Exterior walls closer than 3 feet to property lines shall be one-hour rated construction and have no openings. Table 5-A. C 12/11/89 /• If required, show size, imbednent and location of hold down anchors on foundation plan. Section 302 (d). If hold downs are required, note on plan that hold down anchors must be tied in place prior to foundation inspection. Section 305 (e) 1. Show adequate footings under all bearing walls and shear walls. Section 2907 (b). Show on the plans stepped footings for slopes steeper than 1:10. Section 2907 (c). Show minimum 18" clearance from grade to bottom of floor joists and minimum 12" clearance to bottom of girders. Section 2516 (c) 2. Show pier size, spacing and depth into undisturbed soil. Table 29-A. 99/- Show minimra underfloor access Section 2516 (c). of 18" x 24". Show minimum underf loor ventilation equal to 1 sq. ft. for each 150 sq. ft. of underfloor area. Openings shall be as close to corners as practicable and shall provide cross ventilation on at least two approximately opposite sides. Section 2516 (c) 6. r- i- Show wall bracing. Every exterior wood stud wall and main cross-stud partition shall be braced at each end at least every 25 feet of length with 1x4 diagonal let-in braces or equivalent. Section 2517 (g) 3, Table 25-V. In 2-story buildings, shear panels at the first story (at least 48 inches in width) shall be located at each end or as near thereto as possible and comprise at least 25 percent of the linear length of the wall, or provide design. Section 2517(g)3, Table 25-V. Note cross bridging or blocking. Floor joists and rafters 12" or more in depth shall be supported laterally by bridging at intervals not exceeding 8 feet, unless both edges are held inline. Sec. 2506 (h), 2517 (d) 6. Show blocking at ends and at supports of floor joists, rafters and trusses at exterior walls. Section 2517 (d) 3, 2517 (h) 6. Bearing partitions, perpendicular to joists, shall not be offset from supporting girders, beams, walls or partitions, more than the depth of the joist. Section 2517 (d) 5. 106. ' Show rafter ties. Rafter ties shall be spaced not more than 4 feet on center and be just above the ceiling joists, where rafters and ceiling joists are not parallel. Section 2517 (h) 4. Show rafter purlin braces to be not less than 45 degrees to the horizontal. Section 2517 (h) 5. Show double top plate with minimum 48" lap splice. Section 2517 (g) 2. 106. Show nailing will be in compliance with Table f ,25-Q. Show or note fire stops at the following locations per Section 2516 (f): a. In concealed spaces of stud walls and partitions, including furred spaces, at the ceiling and floor levels and at 10 foot intervals along the length of the wall; b. At all interconnections between concealed vertical and horizontal spaces such as occur at soffits, drop ceilings and cove ceilings; c. In concealed spaces between stair stringers at the top and bottom of the run and between studs along and inline with the run of stairs if the walls under the stairs are unfinished; and d. In openings around vents, pipes, ducts, chimneys, fireplaces and similar openings which afford a passage for fire at ceiling and floor levels, with noncombustible materials . 110. In duplexes, draft stops shall be provided in floor-ceiling assemblies and attics in line with walls separating units and separating units from common areas. 111.) Show stud size and spacing. Maximum allowable stud heights: Bearing wall: 2 x4 and 2x6 max. max. 10' 20'". Non-bearing: 2 Table 25-R-3. X 4 max. 14', 2 x 6 Studs supporting two ceiling must be 3 x 4 Table 25-R-3. floors, a roof and or 2 x 6 at 16" o.c. Note on A.I.T.C. Certificate of Compliance for glued laminated wood members shall be given to the building inspector prior to installation. Section 2505. 2/12/90 1^5 ' Detail all post-to-beam and post-to-footing connections and reference the detail to the plan. Section 2516 (m). . Detail shear transfer connections, including roof and floor diaphragms, to shear walls. Section 2513. Specify nail size and spacing for walls, floor and roof diaphragms, required blocking, dimension ratios. Section 4714 (d)]. all shear Indicate Maintain maximum diaphragm [Tables 25 I, J, K and Provide truss details and truss calculations for this project. Specify truss identification numbers on the plans. . Show 1/2" minimum clearance between top plate of interior partitions and bottom chord of trusses. (To ensure loading will be as designed). . Provide roof framing plan and floor framing plan. Section 302 (d). 120'. Provide framing sections through Section 302 (d). Specify all header sizes for opening over 4' wide. Section 2517 (g) 5. X Provide calculations for main vertical and horizontal framing members and post footings. " iction 302 (b). Provide calculations for lateral loads, shear panels, shear transfer and related. Section 302 (b). In Seismic Zones 3 and 4, the allowable shear wall values for drywall in Table 47-1 must be reduced 50 percent when considering earthquake loads. This does not apply to wind loads. Footnote 1. . 125.) Show on the plans all structural requirements developed in the structural calculations. Section 302 (d). (See comments InImp m at Columns and posts located on concrete or masonry floors or decks exposed to the weather or to water splash or in basements and which support permanent structures shall be supported by concrete piers or metal pedestals projecting above floors unless approved wood of natural resistance to decay or treated wood is used. Section 2516 (c) 4. Individual concrete or masonry piers shall project at least 8 inches above exposed ground unless the columns or posts which they support are of approved wood of natural resistance to decay or treated wood is used. Section 2516 (c) 4. Show location of attic access with minimum size 22" x 30". Section 3205. Show draft separation for attic areas between units in a duplex. Section 2516 (f). 130J Specify plywood and/or particle board thickness, grade and panel identification index. Table 25-S. When roof pitch is less than 3:12, design ridge as a beam. Section 2517 (h). If foundation cripple wall studs are less than 14" high, framing shall be solid blocking, or sheathed with plywood. Section 2517 (g) 4. Cripple wall studs exceeding 4 feet in height shall be 3 inch by 4 inch or 2 inches by 6 inches when supporting 2 stories. Section 2517 (g) 4. Show plywood sheathing over exposed eaves, or other weather exposed areas, is "bonded with exterior glue." Plywood used for exterior wall covering shall be the exterior type. Section 2516 (i), 2516(g)3. Detail access, attic. truss layout if required for 30" x 30" attic for equipment in the Ridges, hips, and valleys shall be at least one size larger than supported rafters. Section 2517 (h) 3. 137.) In open beam construction, provide strap ties across the beams at the ridge support. Section 2501 (b). MECHANICAL fUKCTOEM MECHAHICAL COPE) All heating, ventilating, and cooling systems and appliances shall comply with the Uniform Mechanical Code. 2/12/90 163.' 164. Show that water heater is adequately braced to resist seismic forces, when not connected by rigid pipe. UMC Section 504(d). Show shower stall can accommodate a 30" circle and has a minimum floor area of 1,024 sq. in. UPC 909 (d). Provide clothes washer hook-up for each unit. Title 24, Part 3. NOISE mSULAHON Show details of duplex common (party) walls and floor/ceiling assemblies to achieve a Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating in walls of 50 decibels and an Impact Insulation Class (IIC) rating on floor/ceiling of 50 decibels. Title 24. Show how penetrations of assemblies for piping, electrical devices, recessed cabinets, bathtubs, soffits, or heating ventilating, or exhaust ducts shall be sealed, lined, or insulated to maintain required sound transmission rating. Title 24. Provide insulation in walls and ceiling to achieve STC of 50 between garage and living area if garage use is not controlled by resident. Title 24. ilt CONSERVATION Provide plans, calculations and worksheets to show compliance with current energy standards. The regulations require a properly completed and properly signed Form CF-1R to be either imprinted on the plans, taped to the plans or "sticky backed" on the plans, to allow the building inspector to readily compare the actual construction with the requirements of the approved energy design. (£t-t?& ..All energy items shown on the plans must be in agreement with the information shown on the properly completed Form CF-1R. "Specify on"' the building plans all of the mandatory energy conservation requirements as listed on the enclosure titled, "Mandatory Energy Conservation Requirements". Show the make, model and efficiency of the space heating (or cooling) system and provide heat loss calculations if the output exceeds 45,000 BTU/Hr. For room additions, show that the glazing area of the addition does not exceed 16% of the newly-conditioned floor area, plus glazing removed or relocated due to the addition. inProvide fluorescent general lighting X_J kitchen(s) per CAC, Title 24, 2-5352(J). S.F.D. & 175. Energy conservation design should be for Zone/ 7, Floor drains policy). must have auto-prime (city i Note exhaust fans cannot be ductless type (city policy). IZrf. New residential units must be pre-plumbed for ' future solar water heating. Note "two roof jacks must be installed" where the water heater is in the one story garage and directly below the most south facing roof (City .Ordinance No. 8093). Note "two 3/4" copper pipes must be installed to the most convenient future solar panel location when the water heater is not in a one story garage and is not directly below the most south facing roof. (City Ordinance No. 8093). All piping for present or future solar water heating must be insulated when in areas that are not heated or cooled by mechanical means (city policy). Incorporate the waterproofing details, on the/ attached Policy 80-8, where interior living space occurs below grade at the masonryai(s). Show on the Title Sheet on the plans, the information required by the attached Developmental Services Sheet 112383. 185. All new residential buildings, including ' additions, require a soils report. Please submit two copies. Exception: • If a room addition is limited to one story and 1000 sq. ft. in area, then a soils report is not required. Esgil Corporation will advise the City to place their soils notice stamp on the .plans. Heavy timber framing, minimum 6" x 10" beams and minimum 8" x 8" post, for the structural beam and column supporting the fire separation between the garage and living area above, is acceptable if shown on the plans. (city policy). < SI 2/26/90 10 PAGE 3 GALEY I KEHMERLY/CANYON PL. 14A3A(13)MARCH 28, 1990 bottom of the wall to 18 Inches below final grade. Place a 3- or 4-1n.ch-diameter perforated plastic pipe (wrapped 1n the geotechnical fabric that 1s a part of the proprietary drainage device) at the bottom of the drainage device, well below the top of the Interior floor. The pipe should drain by gravity to a suitable discharge. For those retaining walls which do not have a face on the Interior of a structure, (e.g. a garden wall) we recommend that you choose one of the following drainage systems: a. Place a 3- or 4<-1nch-d1ameter perforated plastic pipe wrapped in geotechnical fabric at the top of the wall footing. The pipe should be drained by gravity to-a suitable discharge. Backfill with a minimum of 2 cubic feet of clean sand per running foot of wall. You may substitute weep holes at 4-foot centers {or open head joints in the first course above the ground surface of concrete-masonry-unit walls) for the drain pipe. However, a small amount of geotechnical fabric must be placed behind the wall over these openings to prevent sand migration. b. Place a 3- or 4-1nch-d1ameter unwrapped perforated plastic pipe at the top of the wall footing and backfill with a minimum of 2 cubic feet of gravel per running foot of wall. Wrap the gravel in geotechnical fabric, excluding only that area where the gravel is in direct contact with the wall. The pipe should drain by gravity to a suitable discharge. You may substitute weep holes at 4-foot intervals (or open head joints in the first course above the ground surface of concrete-masonry-unit walls) for the drain pipe; no additional geotechnical fabric is required in this case. Please note the following: do not allow surface drains, eave-gutter downspouts, etc., to discharge into wall drains. Furthermore, in addition to our drainage recommendations, the architect should specify waterproofing and its protection during backfilling. Waterproofing and its careful application are very important, especially where living space 1s concerned. The application of waterproofing should be performed by those responsible for its performajnee.__ -"— — 2. The foundation plan indicates that the cantilever retaining wall is rigidly connected to the restrained retaining wall (shown on Detail 1 of sheet A1.3). The tops of cantilever retaining walls tend to rotate out an amount about equal to one percent of the wall's total height. Since the tops of restrained walls are restricted from rotating, the junction between a cantilever wall and a restrained wall is subject to high stresses and may crack unless special provisions are made. Perhaps this is partly the intention of the wing wall at the northwest corner of the residence. If so. then vour structural consultant should consider, if he has not already, enhancing the amount of horizontal steel running from the restrained wall to the cantilever wall or providing a flexible connection \ between the two. .this junction. Your structural consultant should specifically address. ESGIL CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619)560-1468 DATE: ~ ISDICT] JURISDICTION: CARLSBAD PLAN CHECK NO: *TI - 2-<? 4- SET; X PROJECT ADDRESS: / ?S 9 JPLAN CHECKER JFILE COPY jUPS ^DESIGNER PROJECT NAME; £PD f Qg <3 PrL£l>\ *TJ D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. I — . The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply | _ j with the jurisdiction's -building codes when minor deficien- cies identified _ _ are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The -check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corp. until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to return to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil staff did not advise the applicant contact person that plan check has been completed. f~~j Esgil staff did advise applicant that the plan check has — been completed. Person contacted: _ Date contacted: Telephone REMARKS: By t fr&e. 2>Q L I (F/O rE~ Enclosures: ESGIL CORPORATION _ DGA DAA DRN QDM PLAH CHECK HO; °f I — JURISDICTION: TO. e! ENCLOSURES: PROJECT ADDRESS: FLOOR AREA:. STORIES: HEIGH: •+ 74-2 REMARKS: PLAH CUT OF yUKKHOKD; PLEASE READ Plan check is limited to technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the handicapped. The plan check is based on regulations enforced by the Building Inspection Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. Present California law mandates that residential construction comply with Title Ik and the following model codes: 1988 UBC (eff. 1/1/90) 1988 UPC (eff. 1/1/90) 1987 NEC (eff. 10/28/87) 1988 UMC (eff. 1/1/90) The above regulations construction, regardless adopted by ordinance. apply to residential of the code editions SHIGZX FAMILY AMD DUPLEX DWELLINGS The circled items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items have to be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 303(c), 1988 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process, note on this list for a copy) where each correction item has been addressed i.e.. plan sheet, specification, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. Date plans received by jurisdiction: Date plans received by Esgil Corporation: Date initial plan check completed: g-5"-'? / BV: Applicant contact person:. :/ V HOIE: PACK TOtRERS ARE HOT HI SKjUKMCE AS PAGES HAVING WO ITEMS HEEDING List No. 12, Carlsbad Single Family Dwelling and Duplex With All Supplements. (1988 UBC) © / © PLANS Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints, and any original plan sets that may have been returned to you by the jurisdiction, to: Esgil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite #208, San Diego, California 92123, (619) 560-1468. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints, and any original plan sets that may have been returned to you by the jurisdiction, to: The jurisdiction's building department. Indicate on the Title Sheet of the plans, the name of the legal owner and name of person responsible for the preparation of the plans. Section 302(a)7. All sheets of plans must be signed by the person responsible for their preparation. (California Business and Professions Code). Plans, specifications and calculations shall be signed by the California state licensed engineer or architect responsible for their preparation, for plans deviating from conventional wood frame construction. Specify expiration date of license. (California Business and Professions Code). Specify on the Title Sheet of the plans the gross floor area of each element of this project including dwelling, garage, carport, patio, deck and balcony. Section 302(d). Provide a ' statement on the Title Sheet of the plans that this project shall comply with Title24 and 1988 UBC. UHC and UPC and 1987 NEC. Submit fully dimensioned plot plan drawn to scale showing location, size, and use of all existing and proposed structures on the lot. Identify property lines and show lot dimensions and all easements. Show location of all cut or fill slopes. Show finish floor elevations and show elevations of adjacent finish grade. Show drainage patterns with minimum slopes. Section 302(d). Indicate distance from property lines to proposed building. Section 302(d). Show on the title sheet all structures, pools, walls, etc. included under this application. Any portion of the project shown on the site plan that is not included with the building permit application filed should be clearly identified as "not included." Clearly show if the lower level is a basement or a story, based on the definition's in Sections 403 and 420. Plot the finish grade (as defined) on the elevations and dimension the distance to the floor above, for story determination. r!2.^ On the cover sheet of the plans, specify any items requiring special inspection, by way of the following: REQUIRED SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS In addition to the regular inspections, the following checked items will also require Special Inspection in accordance with Sec 306 of the Uniform Building Code. ITEM REQ. IF CHECKED REMARKS SOILS COMPLIANCE PRIOR TO FOUNDATION INSP. STRUCTURAL CONCRETE OVER 2500 PSI PRESTRESSED STEEL FIELD WELDING HIGH STRENGTH BOLTS EXPANSION ANCHORS SPECIAL MASONRY SPRAYED ON FIRE PROOFING PILES/CAISSONS DESIGNER-SPECIFIED OTHER rues Exterior walls closer than 3 feet to property lines shall be one-hour rated construction and have no openings. Table 5-A. IP- & . C 12/11/89 Exterior walls closer than 3 feet to a property line shall have 30 inch parapets when the floor area per floor exceeds 1,000 square feet. Section 1709. Projections, including more than 12 inches from the property line. eaves, may not extend into the 3 foot setback Section 1710. Eaves over required windows shall be not less than 30 inches from the side and rear property lines. Section 504. Plastic skylights shall not be installed within that portion of a roof located within a distance to property line where openings in exterior walls are prohibited or required to be protected. Section 5207 (a) 7. Projections, including eaves, shall be one- hour fire-resistive construction, heavy timber or of noncombustible material if they project into the 3" setback area from the property line. Section 1710. Show location of permanently wired smoke detector: a. Centrally located in corridor or area ©giving access to sleeping rooms. On each story. c. In the basement. d. When sleeping rooms are upstairs, at the upper level in close proximity to the stair. e. In rooms adjacent to hallways serving bedrooms, when such rooms have a ceiling height 24 inches or more above the ceiling height in the hallway. NOTE: Detectors shall sound an alarm audible in all sleeping areas of the unit. Section 1210 When the valuation of a room addition or repair exceeds $1,000, or when sleeping rooms are created, smoke detectors shall be provided at existing bedrooms per item 19 above. Section 1210. GEHERAL Habitable rooms, other than kitchens, shall contain at least 70 square feet of floor area. At least one room shall have not less than 120 square feet of floor area. Section 1207 (b). Window area must be at least 1/10 of the floor area and a minimum of 10 square feet per Section 1205 (a). Appears to be deficient in Openable window area in habitable rooms must be 1/20 of the floor area and a minimum of 5 square feet. In bathrooms, laundry rooms and similar rooms 1/20 of area is required and minimum is 1.5 sq. ft. Section 1205 (a). 24. At least 1/2 of the common wall must be open and have an opening not less than 25 %q. ft. nor one tenth of the floor area of the interior room if light and ventilation is being supplied from an adjacent room. Section 1205 (a). Required windows shall not open into a roofed porch unless the ceiling height is at least 7 feet, the longer side is at least 65% open, and the porch abuts a street, yard or court. Section 1205 (a). Provide mechanical ventilation capable of providing five air changes per hour in bathrooms, water closet compartments, laundry rooms and similar rooms if required openable windows are not provided. Section 1205 (c). Show discharge point for exhaust air to be at least 5 feet from any mechanical ventilating intake. Section 1205(c). Ductless fans cannot be used in bathrooms if a tub or shower is present. Section 1205(c). No habitable room, other than a kitchen, shall be less than 7'0" in any dimension. Section 1207 (c). ¥• /• Show that ceiling height for habitable rooms is a minimum of 7'6". Section 1207 (a). Show ceiling height for laundry rooms, hallways, corridors, and bathrooms is a minimum of 7'0". Section 1207 (a). Dimension on the plans the 30" clear width for water closet compartments and 24" clearance in front of water closet. Section 511 (a). Specify safety glazing for glazing in hazardous locations such as glass doors, glazing adjacent to doors and glazing adjacent to walking surfaces. Section 5406. Glazing, in the same wall plane as a door, must be safety glazing if within 12" of the door and less than 60" above the walking surface, unless the glazing is leaded or faceted glass. Section 5406 (d) 6. Glazing in shower and tub enclosures shall be tempered, la*inated or approved plastic (including windows within 5 feet of tub or shower floor). Section 5406 (d) 5. 2/12/90 44. Sleeping rooms shall have a window or exterior door for emergency exit. Sill height shall notexceed 44" above the floor. The window mist have an openable area of at least 5.7 square feetwttnCfieminimum openable width 20" and the minimum openable height 24". Section 1204. Basements in dwelling units shall comly with the above (even if not designated as sleeping rooms). Section 1204. Walls and floors separating units in a duplex shall be of one-hour fire-resistive construction. Section 1202(b). A mezzanine is an intermediate floor and may not have a floor area exceeding 33 1/3 percent of the total floor area in the room below. The mezzanine floor must have a clear height of 7 feet, above and below, and must have the long side open to the room'below except for posts and protective walls or railings not exceeding 42" in height. Section 1716. The loft you show does not comply as a mezzanine floor and is, by Uniform Building Code definition, a story. Section 1716. EXITS. STAIRWAYS. AKD RAJUHGS Floors above the second story shall have not less than 2 exits. Exceptions: 1. Occupied roofs may have one exit if such occupied areas are less than 500 square feet and located no higher than immediately above the second story. 2. When the third floor within a unit does not exceed 500 sq. ft., only one exit need be provided; Section 3303(a). Required exit doorways shall be not less than 36" in width and not less than 6'8" in height, and shall be capable of opening at least 90 degrees. Section 3304 (f). Provide 36" high protective railing for porches, balconies, and open sides of stair landings. Openings between railings shall be less than 6". Section 1711. Show how guardrail connection details are adequate to support 20 pounds per lineal foot at a right angle to the top rail. Table 23-B. Provide stairway and landing details. Section 3306 (b), (c) and (p). a. Maximum rise is 7" and minimum run is 11". When the stairs serves less than 10 occupants, or serves an unoccupied roof, rise may be 8" maximum and run 9" minimum. b. Minimum headroom is 6'-8". c. Minimum width is 36", All handrails per Section 3306 (j), shall satisfy the following: a. b. c. Provide handrail for stairways with 4 or more risers. Handrail shall be 34" nosing of treads. to 38" above the The handgrip portion of handrail shall be not less than 1 1/2", nor more than 2" in cross-sectional dimension. Every stairway landing shall have a dimension, measured in the direction of travel, at least equal to the stairway width. Such dimension need not exceed 36 inches. Section 3306 (g), 3304 (j). An interior door may open inward at the top step of a stairway provided the top step is not more than 7 1/2" lower than the floor level. Section 3304 (i). Provide details of winding stairway complying with Section 3306 (d): a. Minimum tread is 6 inches at any point and minimum 9 inches at a point 12 inches from where the treads are narrowest. b. Maximum rise is 8 inches. c. Minimum width is 36 inches. 5/10/90 iC Provide spiral stairway details, per Section 3306 (f): a. Minimum run is 7 1/2 inches measured at a point 12 inches from where the treads are the narrowest. b. Maximum rise is 9 1/2 inches. Maximum clear opening between risers is 6 inches. c. Minimum headroom is 6 feet 8 inches d. The tread must provide a clear walking area measuring at least 26 inches from the outer edge of the supporting column to the inner edge of the handrail. 31. Spiral stairways may not be used, for required exits when the area served is greater than 400 sq. ft. Section 3306 (f). ^2. Provide I.C.B.O. Research Report and number for metal stairway, or submit plans and calculations and approved fabricator registered with the building department or note that the stairway fabrication plans shall be submitted to and approved by the building official prior to installation. 53. Exterior stairways shall not project into the 3 foot setback from the property lines. Section 3306 (n). 54. The walls and soffits of the enclosed usable space under interior stairs shall be protected on the enclosed side as required for one-hour fire-resistive construction. Section 3306 (m). ^5. Within units, show that corridors have a minimum width of 36 inches. Section 3305 (b). KOUt-'JLHH Specify roof slope. jfl. Roof slope is not adequate for roof type / specified. Table 32-B,C,D and E. Specify roof material and application. 32. Chapter 59.) Specify I.C.B.O. or U.L. approval number for roof materialsnotcovered inU.B.C., e.g., tile, etc. Section 107. Specify minimum 1/4 inch per foot roof slope for drainage or design to support accumulated water. Section 3207 (a) and Section 2305 (f). Show roof drains and overflows. Section 3207. X- r- Provide skylight details to show compliance with Sections 3401 and 5207 or provide I.C.B.O. approval number. Plastic skylights must be separated from each other by at least 4 feet. Section 5207 (a) 6. Show attic ventilation. Minimum vent area is 1/150 of attic area or 1/300 of attic area if at least 50% of the required vent is at least 3 feet above eave vents or cornice vents. Show required area and area provided. Section 3205 (c). Provide fireplace construction details or note construction to be per attached fireplace standard drawing. Chapter 37. Show anchored veneer support and connections attached to wood in Seismic Zones 3 and 4, comply with Section 3006 (d)l and Section 2515 (a). Show ties and #9 wire in horizontal joints. Show height and construction details of all masonry walls. Chapter 24. Show floor and roof connections to masonry walls. Connection shall resist 200 pounds per lineal foot or the actual design load, whichever is greater. Cross grain tension or bending in wood ledgers is not permitted. Section 2310. Show a minimum 2" air space and flashing between planter and building walls. Section 2516 (c) 7. GARAGE AHD CARPORTS Garage requires one-hour fire protection on the garage side of walls and ceiling common to the dwelling. Table 5-B, Section 503 (d). All elements supporting floor above garage, including walls supporting floor joists, must have one-hour fire-resistive protection on the garage side. Section 503 (b) Show 1 3/8" solid core self-closing door for openings between garage and dwelling. Section 503 (d). Garages are not permitted to open into a room used for sleeping purposes. Section 1104. 12/18/90 If. yi. An occupancy separation is not required between carport and residence, provided the carport is open on two or more sides and has no enclosed uses above. Section 503 (a) Exception 3. Show garage framing sections, size of header over garage opening, lateral cross bracing at plate line, method bracing garage front and holddowns if required. Chapter 23. NOTE: Maximum shear panel height-to-width ratio is 3 1/2 to 1 for plywood. Table 25-1. Doors may open into the garage only if the floor or landing in the garage is not more than one inch lower than the door threshold. Section 3304 (i). Provide an 18" raised platform for any FAU, water heater, or other device in the garage which may generate a flame or spark. UMC Section 508, UPC Section 1310 (a). FOONDAIION KEPUJLKhHmiS Per soils report, note on the plan the soils classification, whether or not the soil is expansive and note the allowable bearing value. Section 2905 (c). ' The foundation plan does not comply with the soils report recommendations for this project. Please review the report and modify design, notes and details as required to show compliance: _ Provide notes on the foundation plan listing the soils report recommendation for foundations, slab and building pad preparation. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soils report are properly incorporated into the construction documents (when required by the soil report). The soils engineer recommended that he/she review the foundation excavations. Note on the foundation plan that "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building Department foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the building official in writing that: 1. The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report, 2. The utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and 3. The foundation excavations comply with the intent of the soils report". Show height of all foundation walls. 23. Show height of foundation walls. retained earth Chapter 23. Chapter on all If cut or fill slopes exist, show distance of foundation to edge of cut or fill slopes and show steepness and heights of cuts and fills. Chapter 29. Note on plans that wood shall be 6" minimum above finish grade. Section 2907 (a). Note on plans that surface water will drain away from building and show drainage pattern and key elevations. Section 2905 (f). Dimension foundation per U.B.C. Table 29A: Floors Supported* 1 2 3 Footing Stemwall Width Depth Thickness 6" 8" 10" 12" 15" 18" 12" 18" 24" 6" 7" 8" ^Foundations may support a roof in addition to the floors. Where only a roof is supported, use foundation for one floor. Show foundation sills to be pressure treated, or equal. Section 2516 (c) 3. Show foundation bolt size and spacing. Section 2907 (f). Specify size, I.C.B.O. number and manufacturer of power driven pins. Show edge and end distances and spacing. Section 302 (d). 2/13/90 If required, show size, imbedment and location of hold down anchors on foundation plan. Section 302 (d). '3. If hold downs are required, note on plan that hold down anchors must be tied in place prior to foundation inspection. Section 305 (e) 1. Show adequate footings under all bearing walls and shear vails. Section 2907 (b). Show on the plans stepped footings for slopes steeper than 1:10. Section 2907 (c). Show minimum 18" clearance from grade to bottom of floor joists and minimum 12" clearance to bottom of girders. Section 2516 (c) 2. Show pier size, spacing and depth into undisturbed soil. Table 29-A. 99X Show minimum underfloor access Section 2516 (c). of 18" x 24". r- Show minimum underfloor ventilation equal to 1 sq. ft. for each 150 sq. ft. of underf loor area. Openings shall be as close to corners as practicable and shall provide cross ventilation on at least two approximately opposite sides. Section 2516 (c) 6. FRAMHS Show wall bracing. Every exterior wood stud wall and main cross-stud partition shall be braced at each end at least every 25 feet of length with 1x4 diagonal let-in braces or equivalent. Section 2517 (g) 3, Table 25-V. In 2-story buildings, shear panels at the first story (at least 48 inches in width) shall be located at each end or as near thereto as possible and comprise at least 25 percent of the linear length of the wall, or provide design. Section 2517(g)3, Table 25-V. Note cross bridging or blocking. Floor joists and rafters 12" or more in depth shall be supported laterally by bridging at intervals not exceeding 8 feet, unless both edges are held inline. Sec. 2506 (h), 2517 (d) 6. Show blocking at ends and at supports of floor joists, rafters and trusses at exterior walls. Section 2517 (d) 3, 2517 (h) 6. , Bearing partitions, perpendicular to joists, shall not be offset from supporting girders, beams, walls or partitions, more than the depth of the joist. Section 2517 (d) 5. 106. ' 107. Show rafter ties. Rafter ties shall be spaced not more than 4 feet on center and be just above the ceiling joists, where rafters and ceiling joists are not parallel. Section 2517 (h) 4. Show rafter purlin braces to be not less than 45 degrees to the horizontal. •. Section 2517 (h) 5. Show double top plate with minimum 48" lap splice. Section 2517 (g) 2. Show nailing 25-Q. will be in compliance with Table Show or note fire stops at the following locations per Section 2516 (f): a. In concealed spaces of stud walls and partitions, including furred spaces, at the ceiling and floor levels and at 10 foot intervals along the length of the wall; b. At all interconnections between concealed vertical and horizontal spaces such as occur at soffits, drop ceilings and cove ceilings; c. In concealed spaces between stair stringers at the top and bottom of the run and between studs along and inline with the run of stairs if the walls under the stairs are unfinished; and d. In openings around vents, pipes, ducts, chimneys, fireplaces and similar openings which afford a passage for fire at ceiling and floor levels, with noncombustible materials. 110. In duplexes, draft stops shall be provided in ' floor-ceiling assemblies and attics in line with walls separating units and separating units from common areas. 'ill.) Show stud size and spacing. Maximum allowable stud heights: Bearing wall: 2 x4 and 2x6 max. max. 10', 20'. Non-bearing: 2 Table 25-R-3. x 4 max. 14', 2x6 Studs supporting two ceiling must be 3 x 4 Table 25-R-3. floors, a roof and or 2 x 6 at 16" o.c. [-113.) Note on A.I.T.C. Certificate of Compliance for glued laminated wood members shall be given to the building inspector prior to installation. Section 2505. 2/12/90 liS ' Detail all post-to-beam and post-to-footing connections and reference the detail to the plan. Section 2516 (m). . Detail shear transfer connections, including roof and floor diaphragms, to shear walls. Section 2513. Specify nail size and spacing for all shear walls, floor and roof diaphragms. Indicate required blocking. Maintain maximum diaphragm dimension ratios. [Tables 25 I, J, K and Section 4714 (d)]. Provide truss details and truss calculations for this project. Specify truss identification numbers on the plans. . Show 1/2" minimum clearance between top plate of interior partitions and bottom chord of trusses. (To ensure loading will be as designed). Provide roof framing plan and plan. Section 302 (d). 120T. Provide framing sections through floor framing 1^1. Section 302 (d). Specify all header sizes for opening over 4' wide. Section 2517 (g) 5. f 122 .) Provide calculations for main vertical and horizontal framing members and post footings. Section 302 (b). k!23.) Provide calculations for lateral loads, shear panels, shear transfer and related. Section 302 (b). ' 124 } In Seismic Zones 3 and 4, the allowable shear wall values for drywall in Table 47-1 must be reduced 50 percent when considering earthquake loads. This does not apply to wind loads. Footnote 1. 125.1 Show on the plans all structural requirements developed in the structural calculations. Section 302 (d). (See comments below or at end.) 12%. Columns and posts located on concrete or ' masonry floors or decks exposed to the weather or to water splash or in basements and which support permanent structures shall be supported by concrete piers or metal pedestals projecting above floors unless approved wood of natural resistance to decay or treated wood is used. Section 2516 (c) 4. Individual concrete or masonry piers shall project at least 8 inches above exposed ground unless the columns or posts which they support are of approved wood of natural resistance to decay or treated wood is used. Section 2516 (c) 4. Show location of attic access with minimum size 22" x 30". Section 3205. 19. Show draft separation for attic areas between units in a duplex. Section 2516 (f). 130j Specify plywood and/or particle board thickness, grade and panel identification index. Table 25-S. When roof pitch is less than 3:12, design ridge as a beam. Section 2517 (h). If foundation cripple wall studs are less than 14" high, framing shall be solid blocking, or sheathed with plywood. Section 2517 (g) 4. Cripple wall studs exceeding 4 feet in height shall be 3 inch by 4 inch or 2 inches by 6 inches when supporting 2 stories. Section 2517 (g) 4. Show plywood sheathing over exposed eaves, or other weather exposed areas, is "bonded with exterior glue." Plywood used for exterior wall covering shall be the exterior type. Section 2516 (i), 2516(g)3. Detail access, attic. truss layout if required for 30" x 30" attic for equipment in the Ridges, hips, and valleys shall be at least one size larger than supported rafters. Section 2517 (h) 3. 137.) In open beam construction, provide strap ties across the beams at the ridge support. Section 2501 (b). MECHMUCAL (UNIFORM MECHAHICAL CODE) All heating, ventilating, and cooling systems and appliances shall comply with the Uniform Mechanical Code. 2/12/90 Show the size, location and type of all heating * and cooling appliances or systems. •>. Show source of combustion air to furnace, per Chapter 6, UMC. ~/[ Every dwelling unit shall be provided with heating facilities capable of maintaining a room temperature of 70 degrees F. at 3 feet above the floor in all habitable rooms. Show basis for compliance. UBC, Sec. 1212. 1. Show miniman 30" deep unobstructed working space in front of furnace. Section 505, UMC. 2. Furnace shall not be installed in any bedroom, bathroom or in a closet or confined space with • access only through such room unless specified as direct vent appliance, enclosed furnace or electric heating appliance. - Section 704 UMC. -i. Show I.C.B.O. approval number for prefab fireplace. Show height of chimney above roof per I.C.B.O. approval or Table 37-B. -f, (<?_£" X. Show access to the attic containing equipment to be minimum 30 inches by 30 inches. The opening may be 22 inches by 30 inches if the equipment can be removed through such opening. Section 708 UMC. ^5. Where equipment is installed in the attic, the distance from the attic access to such equipment shall not exceed 20 feet. Note that passageway to the attic furnace shall be unobstructed and have continuous solid flooring not less than 24 inches wide. Section 708 UMC. Show permanent electrical outlet and lighting fixture controlled by a switch for the attic furnace. Section 708 UMC. Show details to comply with Section 709 for furnace under the floor, or Section 710 for roof or outside furnace. Note on plan: Gas vents and non-combustible piping, in walls, passing through three floors or less shall be effectively draft stopped at each floor or ceiling. UBC, Section 1706 (a) 6."~x150.)Provide dryer vent to outside. UMC, SectionO'wos. ELECTRICAL (RATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE) 3 •4 All wiring shall Electrical Code. comply with the National Show on the plan the amperage of the electrical service, the location of the service panel and the location of any sub- panels. If service is over 200 amps, submit single line diagram, panel schedule and load calculations. . Show location of all electrical receptacles. '. Electrical receptacle locations and/or spacing is not adequate in Show at least one convenience outlet other than outlets for laundry, etc., outdoors, in garages and basements. NEC, Art. 210-52. [ 155.) Note convenience outlets in bathrooms, kitchen counter top(s) within 6 feet of the kitchen sink, outdoors, and in garages and basements (other than for laundry and similar equipment)' shall be GFI protected. NEC, Art. 210-8. (156.) Note electrical system ground to be provided per NEC, Art. 250-81. PUMBCTS (UHlruwt PUGHBIHg GODS') Show water heater size, type and location on plans. UPC, Section 1301. Show source for providing combustion air to fuel burning water heater. If wall openings in an enclosure are used, at least one-half of the required opening area shall extend into the upper twelve inches of the enclosure and one-half within the lower twelve inches. UPC, Section 1307. 9. Fuel combustion water heater shall not be installed in bath or bedroom or in a closet opening into bath or bedroom. UPC, Section 1309. Mto.60. Provide adequate barrier to protect water heater from vehicle damage. An 18" platform for the water heater does not satisfy this requirement. UPC, Section 1310. 161. Show I and P valve on water heater and show route of discharge line to exterior. UPC, Section 1007 (e). 1/19/90 162) Show that water heater is adequately braced to resist seismic forces, when not connected by rigid pipe. UMC Section 504(d). 163. Show shower stall can accommodate a 30" circle ' and has a minimum floor area of 1,024 sq. in. UPC 909 (d). . Provide clothes washer hook-up for each unit. Title 24, Part 3. HOISE (DQpTJoras) Show details of duplex common (party) walls and floor/ceiling assemblies to achieve a Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating in walls of 50 decibels and an Impact Insulation Class (IIC) rating on floor/ceiling of 50 decibels. Title 24. Show how penetrations of assemblies for piping, electrical devices, recessed cabinets, bathtubs, soffits, or heating ventilating, or exhaust ducts shall be sealed, lined, or insulated to maintain required sound transmission rating. Title 24. Provide insulation in walls and ceiling to achieve STC of 50 between garage and living area if garage use is not controlled by resident. Title 24. (169. V^ _ / Provide plans, calculations and worksheets to show compliance with current energy standards. The regulations require a properly completed and properly signed Form CF-1R to be either imprinted on the plans, taped to the plans or "sticky backed" on the plans, to allow the building inspector to readily compare the actual construction with the requirements of the approved energy design. f5t-P& Dtrtf&AJC ^ o^>0irp- MniT .S!fr>J Cf- 'K.All energy items shown on the plans must be in agreement with the information shown on the properly completed Form CF-1R. Specify on the building plans all of the mandatory energy conservation requirements as listed on the enclosure titled, "Mandatory Energy Conservation Requirements". Show the make, model and efficiency of the space heating (or cooling) system and provide heat loss calculations if the output exceeds 45,000 BTU/Hr. For room additions, show that the glazing area of the addition does not exceed 16% of the newly-conditioned floor area, plus glazing removed or relocated due to the addition. 174} Provide fluorescent general lighting in kitchen(s) per CAC, Title 24, 2-5352(J). k CARLSBAD S.F.D. & DUPLEX Energy conservation 7. design should be for Zone Floor drains policy). [17 7.) Note exhaust v S (city policy). lie. New residential units must/ future solar water heating, jacks must be installed" heater is in the one story below the most south .Ordinance No. 8093). must have auto-prime (city fans cannot be ductless type be pre-plumbed for Note "two roof where the water arage and directly acing roof (City . Note "two 3/4" copper pipes must be installed to the most convenient future solar panel location when the water heater is not in a one story garage and is not directly below the most south facing roof. (City Ordinance No. 8093). All piping for present or future solar water heating must be insulated when in areas that are not heated or cooled by mechanical means .(city policy). Incorporate the waterproofing details, on the/ attached Policy 80-8, where interior living space occurs below grade at the masonry wall(s). [ 182.) Show on the Title Sheet on the plans, the information required by the attached Developmental Services Sheet 112383. 189. All new residential buildings, including ' additions, require a soils report. Please submit two copies. Exception: If a room addition is limited to one story and 1000 sq. ft. in area, then a soils report is not required. Esgil Corporation will advise the City to place their soils notice stamp on the .plans. . Heavy timber framing, minimum 6" x 10" beams and minimum 8" x 8" post, for the structural beam and column supporting the fire separation between the garage and living area above, is acceptable if shown on the plans. (city policy). "70-A'/ 2/26/90 10 All structures require a Class B roof covering, Enclosures: except room additions. If a room addition covers all of the existing building (2nd story 1^ addition), then the above exception doesn't apply. £,m City Ordinance 9792 requires two parking spaces/unit with clear area of 20'x20' i.e. no washing machines, etc. Show compliance. 3. All chimneys attached to any appliance or fireplace that burns solid fuel shall be equipped with an approved spark arrester. The net free area of the spark arrester shall be not less than four times the net free ara of the outlet of the chimney. The spark arrester screen shall have heat and corrosion resistance equivalent to 12 gauge wire, 19 gauge galvanized wire or 24 gauge stainless steel. Openings shall not permit the passage of spheres having a diameter larger than I/2-inch and shall not block the passage of spheres having a diameter of less than 3/8-inch. KCSCEUARBOOS S~\188J Please see additional corrections, or remarks,x—S on the following page. (189.1 To speed up the recheck process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. 190.) Please indicate here if any changes have been \ / made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please check. _Yes No The City of Carlsbad has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number 619/560-1468, to perform the plan check for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan check items, please contact _ at Esgil Corporation. If you have any questions regarding City Building permit procedures, please contact Carter Darnell at the City of Carlsbad, 2075 Las Palmas Dr., telephone 619/438-1161. Thank you. 2/14790 11 FOLLOWING NOTES SFBCrFHJC MANDATORY RBQUIKEKEHIS SBOULD BE DKXRPORAIED OH FLAK SHEETS, OR CONTAINED WltbLLH JOB SPECXF1CAIIOH BOOMDOS. ENERGY CDHSERVATIOM KEQD1 (1) All heating, ventilating, air conditioning, and water heating equipment shall meet all of the requirenents of the Appliance Efficiency Standards and shall be certified by the California Energy Conmission. (2) A two stage themes tat, which controls the suppleaentary heat on its second stage, shall be provided for heat puaps. " (3) Thermostats shall be equipped with an automatic setback, which the building occupant can program to automatically set back the thermostat twice in 24 hours. (fc) Equipment which requires preventive maintenance to naintain efficient operation shall be furnished with complete necessary maintenance information. (5) All gas-fired fan type central furnaces, gas-fired fan type wall furnaces, and cooking appliances shall be equipped with an intermittent ignition device. (6) All fan systems exhausting air to the outside shall ba provided with backdraft danpers. (7) All transverse duct, plenum, and fitting joints shall ba sealed with pressure sensitive tape or jnastic to prevent air loss and shallTbe insulated to confora to the provisions of Section 1005 of the UMC, 1982 Edition. (8) A vapor barrier is required in clinate zone 1, It, and 16. (9) All manufactured windows and sliding glass doors shall meet the 1972 ANSI air infiltration standards and shall be certified and labeled. (10) All swinging doors and windows leading to unconditioned areas shall be fully weather-stripped. (11) Storage type water heaters and storage and backup tanks for solar systems shall be externally wrapped with R-12 insulation or greater. (12) Ihe five feet of pipe closest to the water heater, if outside conditioned space, shall be insulated with a mininua of R-3. Steam and steam condensation return piping and recirculating hot water piping outside the building envelope shall be insulated in accordance with T20-lMD6(d). (13) Lamps used in luminaries for general lighting in kitchens and bathrooms shall have an efficiency of not less than 25 lumens per vatt. (14) Showerheads and faucets shall be equipped with flow restrictors as outlined in the appliance efficiency standards and shall be certified to the Energy Conaission. (15) Masonry and factorybuilt fireplaces on exterior walls, shall ba equipped with tight-fitting closeable metal or glass doors covering the entire opening of the firebox; a combustion air intake equipped with a readily accessible, operable, and tight fitting camper to draw air from the outside of the building; and a tight fitting flue damper with a readily accessible control. (16) Insulation used shall comply with California Quality Standards. (17) Ihe insulation installer shall post, a signed certificate. .'.Section. 276- Insulation Certificate (All Occupancies). After installing insulation, the installer shall post in a conspicuous location in the building a certificate signed by the installer and the builder stating that the installation conforms the requirements of Title 24, Part 2, Chapter 2-53, and that the materials installed confora with the requirements of Title 20, Chapter 2, Subchapter 4, Article 3. Hie certificate shall state the manufacturer's name and material identification, the installed "R" value, and (in applications of loose fill insulation) the minioum installed weight per square foot consistent with the manufacturer's labeled density for the desired "R" value. (18) For infiltration control all openings and penetrations oust be caulked and sealed, such as around windows, at sole plates, and openings for utility pipes and wires. Fora ECH 3/5/86 Date!Jurisdiction HARLSBAD Prepared byi VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK_FEE p Bldg. Dept. Q Esgil PLAN CHECK NO. 9/- BUILDING ADDRESS APPLICANT/CONTACT BUILDING OCCUPANCY TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION /g-3 PHONE XO.fc/l) <Z5Z-~ /03Z, DESIGNER PHONE CONTRACTOR PHONE BUILDING PORTION djL £>uJ£L't-}AJC-7 &QG.&(s>& Air Conditioning Commercial Residential Res. or Comm. Fire Sprinklers Total Value BPILDING AREALftfc/ $&<?(* 74-8 ~~ • - . VALUATION MULTIPLIER IZ.oO 2.1. 00 • g £ @ ' ' VALUE-' ^-^//, V0 & "2 ^7 ^^ / ft (?'&£-.£,*» ~r t ' t-^U~*^ /5! 7^^ ' • — ^-^7/ // fc» /> 55. !? Z^f^^ -1 ay ic Building Permit Fee $. Plan Check Fee $ COM HtNTSi SHEET / OF /12/87 8" BUILDING PLANCHECK ^ ENGINEERING CHECKLIST i/i C/)s IV1 s T C H E K COa- N D C H E K 3 R D C H E K PLANCHECK NO. S»i — OZ9^ i8~3O OQMYON/ PL/ICE A.P.N. 205-OSD-S^ PROJECT ID: LEGAL REQUIREMENTS Site Plan C LOT 4 ITEM COMPLETE ITEM INCOMPLETE NEEDS YOUR ACTION ITEM SELECTED 1. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: north arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way width and dimension setbacks. '—' '—' 2. Show on site plan: Finish floor elevations, pad elevations, elevations of finish grade adjacent to building, existing topographical lines, existing and proposed slopes, driveway with percent (%) grade and drainage patterns. 3. Provide legal description and Assessors Parcel Number. Discretionary Approval Compliance 4. No Discretionary approvals were required. Project complies with all ^^Engineering Conditions of Approval for Project No . CT o1^ ~ 13 _ . '—I * Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of Approval for Project No. Conditions complied with by: Date:. Field Review '—' '—' '—' 7. Field review completed. No issues raised. 8. Field review completed. The following issues or discrepancies with the site plan were found: '—' '—' '—'A. Site lacks adequate public improvements '—' '—' '—' B. Existing drainage improvements not shown or in conflict with site plan. —' C. Site is served by overhead power lines. P:\DOCS\MISFORMS\FRM0010.0H REV. 02/27/91 '—' '—' '—' D. Grading is required to access site, create pad or provide for ultimate street improvement. '—' '—' '—' E. Site access visibility problems exist. Provide onsite turnaround or engineered solution to problem. DDD F. Other: Dedication Requirements 9. No dedication required. 10. Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8V x 11" plat map and submit with a title report and the required processing fee. All easement documents must be approved and signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. The description of the dedication is as follows: Dedication completed, Date By:. Improvement Requirements I—I I—I I—I af No public improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE; Damaged or defective improvements found adjacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction of the City inspector prior to occupancy. '—''—'12. Public improvements required. This project requires construction of public improvements pursuant to Section 18.40 of the City Code. Please have a registered Civil Engineer prepare appropriate improvement plans and submit for separate plancheck process through the Engineering Department. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of permit. The required improvements are: Improvement plans signed, Date: 2B P:\DOCS\MISFORHS\FRM0010.DH REV. 02/27/91 '—' 13. Improvements are required. Construction of the public improvements may be deferred in accordance with Section 18.40 of the City Code. Please submit a letter requesting deferral of the required improvements together with a recent title report on the property and the appropriate processing fee so we may prepare the necessary Future Improvement Agreement. The Future Improvement Agreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Future Improvement Agreement completed, Date: By: '—' '—' '—' 13a. Inadequate information available on site plan to make a determination on grading requirements. Please provide more detailed proposed and existing elevations and contours. Include accurate estimates of the grading quantities (cut, fill, import, export). '—' '—' '—' 14. No grading required as determined by the information provided on the site plan. ^ '—' '—' 15. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared V by a registered Civil Engineer must be submitted for separate plan check and approval through the Engineering Department. NOTE: The Grading Permit must be issued and grading substantially complete and found acceptable to the City Inspector prior to issuance of Building Permits. Grading Inspector sign off. Date: by: ^ COKDiTIO^JAL Miscellaneous Permits 16. Right-of-Way Permit not required. 17. Right-of-Way Permit required. A separate Right-of-Way Permit issued by the Engineering Department is required for the following: '—' '—' '—' 18. Sewer Permit is not required. '—' '—' 19. Sewer Permit is required. A sewer Permit is required concurrent with Building Permit issuance. The fee required is noted below in the fees section. 20. Industrial Waste Permit is not required. P:\DOCS\MISFORMS\FRM0010.DH REV. 02/27/91 2-1 '—' '—' 21. Industrial Waste Permit is required. Applicant must complete Industrial Waste Permit Application Form and submit for City approval prior to issuance of a Building Permits. Permits must be issued prior to occupancy. Industrial Waster Permit accepted - Date: By: Fees Required 13 27. Park-in-Lieu Fee Quadrant; KJ .\A/. Fee per Unitr Total 23. Traffic Impact Fee I Fee Per Unit: Total Fee^ oOO D M/A) 24./ Bridqe and Thorough fare Fee Fee Per Unit: Total Fee: 25. Public Facilities Fee required. 26. Facilities Management Fee Zone: 1 _ Fee: 27. Sewer Fees Permit No .SESf n AS 7 . EDU ' s I Benefit Area; M/A _ Fee: Ko(Q. 28. Sewer Lateral Required: Fee: _ 29. REMARKS; S^GM OFF FBOM r,(TY i NSPFCHO\f J>EPf. MUST SE QgT^^]ME5 6EFDGE. ENGINEERING AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE PERMIT BY: S.QCMEftELL DATE: 2.4 P:\DOCS\MISFORMS\FRM0010.DH REV. 02/27/91 PLANNING CHECKLIST Plan Check No. <?/~l 1V Address iQto CA< f Planner f/4/J L/*Jc,L^ Phone 438-1161 ext. (Name) APN: ~~ i M Type of Project and Use S^^a. A/6*) Zone (L—l Facilities Management Zone (_a a ao o o % % % Legend s 01 8 ^ ^ ^<J O (J r~^^» 555 [2] Item Complete S ow6 Item Incomplete - Needs your action 1, 2, 3 Number in circle indicates plancheck number where deficiency was identified Environmental Review Required: YES NO DATE OF COMPLETION: * Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval D Discretionary Action Required: YES NO X TYPE APPROVAL/RESO. NO. DATE: PROJECT NO. OTHER RELATED CASES: Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval California Coastal Commission Permit Required: YES NO X DATE OF APPROVAL: San Diego Coast District, 1333 Camino Del Rio South, Suite 125, San Diego, CA. 92108-3520 (619) 297-9740 Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval D 0LH Landscape Plan Required: YES NO X See attached submittal requirements for landscape plans Site Plan: D a nan Zoning: 1. 2. 3. 4. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way width and dimensioned setbacks. Show on Site Plan: Fj|j«jb fl™^ °1ovatinnfi_H^"Qti"ng of finish grade adjacent to buuding,(gxisting topographical Unes^existing and proposed slopes and driveway/*" — ~""^ Provide legal description of property. Provide assessor's parcel number. 1. Setbacks: Front: Int. 1>ide: Street Side: Rear: 2. 3. 4. Additional Comments Lot coverage: Height: Parking: Required Required Required Required Required Required Spaces Required Guest Spaces Required Shown Shown — Shown ' — / 3' Shown So.' 7" Shown Shown Shown Shown /A} £,&&SL <S67- ti/)c&- OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER PLNCK.FRM CATLIN ENGINEERING, INC. P.O. BOX4225 La Mesa, California 92044-0970 (619) 588-8500 ALL REPORTS ARE SUBMITTED AS THE CONFIDENTIAL PROPERTY OF CLIENTS AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBLICATION OF OUR REPORTS, CONCLUSIONS. OH EXTRACTS FROM OR REGARDING THEM IS RESERVED PENDING OUR WRITTEN APPROVAL AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CLIENTS. THE PUBLIC AND OURSELVES. Galey and Kemmerly Homes 7720 El Camino Real* Suite 2M La Costa, California 92009 ATTN: Mr. Hike Galey December 28, 1989 Subject: Project No. 14A3A(2) Addendum to Review of Grading Plan and Foundation Design Four Proposed Single-Family Residences North Side of Canyon Place Carlsbad, California Gentlemen: In accordance with your request, and In order to satisfy some of therequirements of the Plan Check Correction List you provided us, this letterpresents verification that the recommendations presented 1n the previous consultant's soils Investigation report are still applicable, except as specifically modified 1n our reports and letters. The property being served1s more particularly referred to as Assessors Parcel No. 263-221-15 through -18 1n the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California. Ketchum Engineering, Inc. prepared a report entitled, "Geotechnlcal Investigation for Proposed 8-Lot Subdivision, Canyon Street, Carlsbad,California," which Includes the subject site, dated May 22, 1987. A compaction report, to be signed by Alton L. Rudin, dated September 9, 1989, was Issued to verify the compaction of soils placed prior to that time. We reviewed the grading plan and foundation design and presented the results 1n a letter dated December 8, 1989. We more recently presented a report of compacted filled ground for the subject site dated December 18, 1989. We understand that the City's review of our letter of December 8 Indicatedthat we should state either that the recommendations 1n the Ketchum Engineering report are applicable, or present our own recommendations. As noted above, the recommendations In the Ketchum Engineering report are stillapplicable, except as specifically modified by our reports and letters. We trust this letter provides the Information you require at this time. Yours very truly, CATLIN ENGINEERING, „// Mark B. Catl Vice President RCE 40570 D1str. (2) Addressee MBC/nhw Consulting Engineers and Geologists CATLIN ENGINEERING, INC. P.O. Bo;* 4225 La Mesa, California 92044-0970 (619) 588-8500 ALL REPORTS ARE SUBMITTED AS THE CONFIDENTIAL PROPERTY OF CLIENTS AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBLICATION OF OUR REPORTS, CONCLUSIONS, OR EXTRACTS FROM OR REGARDING THEM IS RESERVED PENDING OUR WRITTEN APPROVAL AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CLIENTS, THE PUBLIC AND OURSELVES. Galey and Kemmerly Homes December 18, 1989 7720 El Camino Real, Suite 2M La Costa, California 92009 ATTN: Mr. Mike Galey Subject: Project No. 14A3A(1) Report of Compacted Filled Ground and Expansion Index Test Results Proposed Four-Lot Subdivision North side of Canyon Place Carlsbad, California Gentlemen: This report records our observations and the results of tests we performed in connection with the compaction of filled ground placed on the subject property. This property is more particularly referred to as Assessors Parcel No. 263-221-15 through -18 in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California. This report addresses fill placement and compaction accomplished during the period from November 30 through December 15, 1989. Grading operations were performed by the Fleuret Corporation. Ketchum Engineering, Inc., previously performed a geotechnical investigation for a proposed eight-lot subdivision that includes the subject property, the results of which were presented in a report dated May 27, 1987. Prior to any testing by Catlin Engineering, Inc., the lots were partially graded and tested, the results of which were presented in a report provided to us by Mr. Mike Galey entitled, "COMPACTION REPORT Located on: Canyon Street, Carlsbad, California," undated and unsigned. We understand that this report will be signed and stamped by a registered engineer competent to practice soils engineering. At your request we performed an expansion index test on a representative sample of the soils intended for slope backfill on Lot 4 to determine volumetric change characteristics with change in moisture content. The soil was tested in accordance with the UBC Standard No. 29-2 and found to be non expansive. The results are presented below. Soil Description Orange Brown Fine Sand Expansion Index 1 Consulting Engineers and Geologists PAGE 2 GALEY AND KEMMERLY/CANYON PUCE 14A3A(1) DECEMBER 18, 1989 The results of the field density tests and the elevations at which they were taken are presented on page T-l under "Field Density Test Results." The results of the laboratory tests of the maximum dry density and the optimum moisture content of the fill soils are presented on page L-l under "Laboratory Test Results." The approximate locations of the compacted filled ground and field density tests are presented on Drawing No. 1 entitled "Approximate Location of Compacted Filled Ground." Drawing No. 1 was sketched from a reduced copy of grading plan entitled "GRADING PLAN for CANYON PLACE," and our field observations. Field dimensions are established by a combination of pacing and taping. Grading began with the exposed filled ground surface scarified, moisture conditioned and compacted. Where fill areas were made on hillsides or exposed slope areas with gradients greater than 10 percent, horizontal benches were cut into firm undisturbed natural ground in order to provide both lateral and vertical stability. We conclude that the soils placed on the subject site under our inspection have been compacted to at least 90 percent of their maximum dry density. These soils will support structures without detrimental settlement if the foundations are placed at least 5 feet back from the tops of slopes. Foundations, fences, edges of slabs, or paved surfaces placed within 5 feet from the top of a slope could suffer distress as a result of the inherent poor lateral stability of soils there. In this zone, foundations should be deepened such that they bottom at least 5 feet back from the face of the slope at that level. Please refer to Appendix E. We observed that none of the soils placed or allowed to remain in the upper three feet below finish grade are sufficiently expansive to necessitate special design of foundations and slabs. The soils encountered on this site were determined to be non-expansive with respect to change in volume with change in moisture content. However, we recommend that as a minimum, concrete slabs-on-grade be at least 4 inches thick. Any new foundations should be reinforced with one continuous #4 reinforcing bar placed 3 inches above the bottom of the footing and one continuous #4 reinforcing bar placed 1 1/2 inches below the top of slab or top of stem wall. Further, we suggest that the slabs be reinforced with #4 reinforcing bars spaced not greater than 48 inches on center each way at midheight of slab. Please note that we consider this reinforcing to be a minimum and not to be considered as an adequate lesser substitute for reinforcing that is recommended by the structural designer. Provide a minimum of 4 inches of clean sand beneath all concrete slabs. Provide a moisture barrier 2 inches below slabs in area that receive flooring which might be adversely affected by capillary moisture. Please note that this is not the expensive "plaster sand" nor is it "fill sand." An acceptable product from Nelson Sloan is what they term "A fill sand." Positive drainage should be provided away from all perimeter footings. Positive drainage is defined as a slope of 2 percent or greater (2 feet fall per 100 feet) away from the foundations for at least 5 feet, drainage should then be directed by swales that fall at 2 percent or greater to the street or some other collective drainage system. PAGE 3 GALEY AND KEMMERLY/CANYON PLACE 14A3A(1) DECEMBER 18, 1989 A safe allowable soil bearing pressure of 2000 pounds per square foot may be used as set forth In the above-mentioned soils Investigation report. We observed that the soils encountered during grading did not differ sufficiently from those anticipated to have an effect on the recommendations made in the above-mentioned soils investigation report. Please be aware that proper site drainage and continuous maintenance of drainage facilities is directly related to the stability of foundations as well as the stability of cut and fill slopes. We therefore recommend that surface run-off be directed away from slopes and foundations, toward the street or other drainage facilities without intermediate ponding. Surface waters should not be permitted to flow over the top of any exposed slopes. We further recommend that a responsible engineer be authorized to review the design and construction of any additional foundations and inspect any further grading or trench backfill in order to assure that our recommendations have been understood. Seemingly minor variations between our recommendations and the actual construction can result in a project that performs inadequately or worse. Therefore, if foundations or further earthwork are not inspected by us, we offer no assurance of adequate foundation performance or that any of our conclusions related to soil stability may be relied upon. We recommend that the landscaping and drainage be designed and maintained according to the attached Appendix L and that this Appendix be passed to any new owners in order that they may maintain their property's value by affording the kind of care set forth therein. We especially recommend the use of complete eave gutters and downspouts that discharge well away from retaining walls, foundations, or unpaved slopes. Note that Appendix L is not peculiar to this property but rather is a group of practical suggestions for good property maintenance. We recommend that following construction, the soil moisture be carefully controlled. Irrigation and surface drainage should be managed so as to avoid saturating soils near slopes, foundations, or retaining walls. This includes, but is not limited to, maintenance of eave gutters, downspouts, and positive surface drainage which causes water to flow away from retaining walls, foundations, or unprotected slopes. Experience has shown that even with these provisions, a shallow groundwater condition may develop in areas where no such condition existed prior to site development; this is particularly true where a substantial increase in surface water infiltration results from an increase in landscape irrigation. It would be uneconomical to construct enough drainage features to absolutely prevent the possibility of shallow groundwater on the entire site. Therefore, we recommend that shallow groundwater conditions be remedied if and when they develop. PAGE 4 GALEY AND KEMMERLY/CANYON PLACE 14A3A(1)DECEMBER 18, 1989 If you have anyThe opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated, questions, please feel free to contact this office. Pages Tl and LI, Drawing No. 1, Appendices E and L, and an unsigned, undated copy of the compaction report provided to us by Mr. Mike Galey, are parts of this report. Respectfully submitted, CATLIN ENGINEERING, INC. Mark B. Cttlin Vice President RCE 40570 Distr. (2) Addressee MBC:JAS/mcp/kjg/nhw PAGE T-l GALEY/CANYON PLACE 14A3A DECEMBER 18, 1989 FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS Field density tests were performed in accordance with the current ASTM D 1556 "Standard Test Method for Density of Soil In Place by the Sand-Cone Method." The resul Test No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ts are presented below. Location of Test SEE DRAWING NO. 1 LOT 1 " LOT 2 n LOT 1 " LOT 4 n n N n n n n ii n n LOT 1 Test Elevation (ft) 162.0 164.0 164.0 162.0 163.0 FG FG 168.0 170.0 171.5 173.0 175.0 177.0 178.0 178.0 178.0 179.0 181.0 168.0 Moisture Content (% dry wt) 9.8 6.2 6.9 8.0 6.0 9.4 13.5 8.4 11.9 11.4 11.2 11.9 14.1 6.3 6.7 10.2 12.3 9.5 8.7 Dry Density (pcf) 130.4 129.8 126.3 125.6 130.4 122.0 120.9 120.4 131.1 128.6 121.2 120.0 119.3 103.1 116.8 120.2 119.3 115.9 117.7 Soil Type A A A A A A A A A A A A A C C C C C C Relative Compaction (%) 98.2 98.7 96.0 95.5 99.1 92.8 91.9 91.5 99.7 97.8 91.3 90.4 90.0 78.8 89.3 91.9 91.2 88.6 90.0 Test Date Remarks 11-30-89 12-04-89 " " " 12-06-89 " -» n 12-08-89 n ' 12-13-89 FAILED SEE #15 RETEST OF #14 FAILED SEE #16 RETEST OF #15 N 12-14-89 FAILED SEE #20n PAGE T-2 GALEY/CANYON PLACE 14A3A DECEMBER 18, 1989 FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS Field density tests were performed in accordance with the current ASTM D 1556 "Standard Test Method for Density of Soil In Place by the Sand-Cone Method." The results are presented below. Test Moisture Dry Relative Test Location Elevation Content Density Soil Compaction Test No. of Test (ft) (% dry wt) (pcf) Type (%) Date Remarks SEE DRAWING NO. 1 20 LOT 4 181.0 10.5 113.6 C 36.9 12-15-89 RETEST OF #18 FAILED SEE #21 21 " 181.0 10.0 120.2 C 91.9 " RETEST OF 20 22 LOT 1 168.0 13.2 130.7 C 100.0 PAGE L-l GALEY/CANYON PLACE 14A3A DECEMBER 18, 1989 LABORATORY TEST RESULTS The maximum dry density and optimum moisture content of the soils were determined in .accordance with the current ASTM D 1557 "Standard Test Methods for Moisture-Density Relations of Soils and Soil-Aggregate Mixtures using 10-lb Rammer and 18-in. Drop." The results are presented below. Optimum Maximum Moisture Soil Soil Dry Density Content Type Description (pcf) (% dry wt) A Brown Slightly Clayey Fine to Medium Sand 132.8 8.5 B Orange Brown Fine to Medium Sand 124.2 9.9 (Import) C Orange Brown Fine Sand 130.8 8.9 II ss * £ s $ ' £ i| CATLIN ENGINEERING, INC. P.O. Box 4225 La Mesa, California 92044-0970 (619) 588-8500 ALL REPORTS ARE SUBMITTED AS THE CONFIDENTIAL PROPERTY OF CLIENTS AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBLICATION OF OUR REPORTS. CONCLUSIONS. OR EXTRACTS FROM OR REGARDING THEM IS RESERVED PENDING OUR WRITTEN APPROVAL AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CLIENTS, THE PUBLIC AND OURSELVES. PROPOSED STRUCTURE TOP OF SLOPE CONCRETE FOUNDATION PLANE PARALLEL TO FACE OF SLOPE MINIMUM FOUNDATION SETBACK FROM FACE OF SLOPE REV. 11/16/89 APPENDIX E Consulting Engineers and Geologists CATLIN ENGINEERING, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS P.O. Box 4225 La Mesa, California 92044-0970 (619) 588-8500 APPENDIX L LANDSCAPING AND DRAINAGE 1. The landscaping utilized within the subject project should be accomplished in a manner which does not diminish and, where possible, enhances the existing surface drainage. We consider it absolutely imperative that the future homeowners maintain adequate surface drainage facilities, depending upon the landscaping amenities installed on the lot(s). We further suggest that the roof gutters and downspouts be installed and that the final discharge for these drains be directed to a suitable discharge point, such as a curb outlet or a subsurface drainage facility. 2. All slopes should be planted with low water consuming, fire resistant plants which meet the criteria established by local governing authorities. The irrigation regimen should be established to encourage deep root growth to improve surficial slope stability and vigorous surface coverage to help control erosion. 3. If future homeowners consider any revision in the existing grades, through the installation of retaining walls, pools, spas, or landscaping such that the drainage might be changed, we strongly recommend that these plans be reviewed by a representative of this office or other civil engineer competent in drainage and soil mechanics. We recommend against any significant regrading of the existing lot(s). 4. The construction of all fences, patio slabs, decks, and any other rigid structure within a horizontal distance of 5 feet from the top of any slope, must include adequate foundations. The foundation for the above described structures would extend not less than 12 inches below a line located S feet horizontally inward from the face of any slope. 5. We strongly recommend that copies of this Appendix "L" be forwarded to the future owners and occupants of this project with every encouragement that the provisions herein be heeded. u_oCMLUCD2_lX»—»OLUO.Q_DCLUX•P"LU LUO4b<LUh-Z LL UJ < LUGOLUO ^ •JQT3CCQ.af ?CO "j; *o6 I is*•* M 3jO> O> (D O) (/)•& -2 £ -fi -COa. oa>COtl"00*i.2 sg"SowS "Ii«f* eo c ^N. co a>co eoi- CO•too hi* -w g >,— •* • TJ J*! h • M O *• ». C^*»5 JJ ° • S«5 =§'l -U8^?.2 <O h- 00 O) *x;s*i228.-*o IIsi ^llsj'slg ^ssl*8!" 3"1s jfssglls ss^st-sa .l3?^?* ^fa.! Mi«.e •« Jc§ a «"°g"*i.3ei « f" "2? oo 4" S SiH^sH^Lfi H?:|a§-g fl|s^8l! 5isf I- fjn^tiipriiMi^q^ihajri:! iEoj-lfi-s Srih ilse°-5--QL c »<5 K • O', *> . SkT» c-o • filo • 5 S.C w 8 • " o SS- -c --o= -i b ^x vx • i OIMX* % ••H.wbe* »• u« *«9«0 0.^*1 IH k njiUM* « • M • •>aa«-H<o ••<idi ••Sj(2>>a * • SB^ * wt> S 2? * 2»o>k5 exu-Hd«a« 223* o'SjjSn* CM CO IO 5555l=si|s":I"5 ?3S2?5 SS •H«.'55-S^'S,'r-f-li e> C 16 • K (O I** DC <r SoP S fiC o Q QC 0) O o< Ul COLU o X fiCLU UJ Ul wJ7i! vt<H CATLIN ENGINEERING, INC P.O. Box 4225 La Mesa, California 92044-0970 (619) 588-8500 ALL REPORTS ARE SUBMITTED AS THE CONFIDENTIAL PROPERTY OF CLIENTS AUTHORIZATION FOR P FROM OR REGARDING THEM IS RESERVED PENDING OUR WRITTEN APPROVAL AS A MUTUAL PROTECT' OR EXTRACTS Galey and Kemmerly Homes 7720 El Camino Real, Suite 2M La Costa, California 92009 ATTN: Mr. Mike Galey , December 8, 1989 Subject: Project No. 14A3A Review of Grading Plan and Foundation Design Four Proposed Single Family Residences, North Side of Canyon Place Carlsbad, California Gentlemen: In accordance with your request, we have reviewed "the £dundation design prepared for the development. n£ tha cuhjort^prnpprty^ Th_Cs prnpprty is more particularly referred to as^ftssessors Parcel No. 263-221-15 through -18 in the City of Carlsbad, County of san Diego,-5ta1^noT~C'a1ifornia. Ketchum Engineering, Inc., prepared a report entitled "Geotechnical Investigation for Proposed 8 Lot Subdivision, Canyon Street, Carlsbad, California," which includes the subject site, dated May 22, 1987. A compaction report signed by Alton L. Ruden, dated September 9, 1989, was issued to verify the compaction of soils placed prior to that time. Catlin Engineering, Inc., has been providing compaction testing and observation of fill placement since November 28, 1989. We have reviewed the grading plan and foundation design as follows: The grading plan is entitled "Grading Plan for Canyon Place, C.T. 85-15," one sheet, prepared by Alton L. Ruden, dated October 12, 1987. This grading plan indicates a retaining wall detail that requires a 5-foot setback between face of foundation and face of slope. We judge that this setback is adequate. We also reviewed a set of plans entitled "Galey & Kemmerly Homes, Canyon Place, Carlsbad, California," prepared by Architekton, undated, sheets S-l, S-2, S-1.3, A-l.l, A-1.2, A-1.3, A-1.4, A-1.5, A-1.6, A-1.7, S-2.3, A-2.1, A-2.2, A-2.3, A-2.4, A-2.5, D-l, D-2, D-3, and SE-1. Sheets A-1.4 and A-2.3 were modified from the original to indicate that the concrete slab is to be reinforced with No. 4 bars at 48 inch centers each way and will be placed over 2 inches of clean sand over a moisture barrier over 2 inches of clean sand. Sheet D-l was modified from the original to indicate that concrete slabs are to have a 4-inch minimum thickness. Consulting Engineers and Geologists -- /*4GE 2 GALEY & KEMMERLY HOMES/CANYON PLACE 14A3A DECEMBER 8, 1989 We judge that this foundation design is in substantial accordance with our recommendations. We note that grading will be required for development of the site. If soil is imported and placed within three feet of finish grade anywhere within five feet outside the building perimeter, then a different foundation cross section may be required. We recommend that you authorize us to inspect the foundation excavations, placement of steel and placement of concrete in the foundations, to assure that our recommendations have been understood. If we are not allowed to do so then we offer no assurance of adequate foundation performance. Please notify us 24 hours in advance of foundation inspections. This opportunity to be of service is sine questions, please do not hesitate to Respectfully submitted, CATLIN ENGINEERING, INC. -7H«x>&2 Mark B. Cat/in Vice President RCE 40570 Distr. (2) Addressee MBC/kjg ;eciated. If you have any (2) Mission Road, Suite A Fall brook, California 92028 ATTN: Mr. Chester Ehrig (For Pickup 12-08-89) COMPACTION REPORT Located on: Canyon Street Carlsbad, California Prepared For: September 9, 1989 W.O. G-1013 Prepared By: ALTON L RUDEN REGISTERED CIVIL E«GI?,'E£S 170-', MOUNTAIN VIEWAVE OCEANSiDE. CALiF. 92054 (619)757-3112 September 9, 1989 W.O. G-1013 Page 2 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of our field density testing and observations during the rough grading operations on the subject tract. Field density test results are presented in Table 1 at the end of this report. The approximate locations of the tests are plotted on the enclosed Grading Plan, Plate 1. The project essentially entailed the development of eight level pads by gently grading and cutting east- and southeast-facing slopes. The fill is intended to support continuous-wall footings and slabs on grade for two-story single-family residences. LABORATORY TEST DATA The laboratory standard for determining the maximum dry density was performed in accordance with ASTM D 1557-78. Field density tests were performed in accordance with ASTM D 1556-82. The results of the laboratory maximum dry density testing of the soil used as compacted fill on the subject tract are listed below: Description Maximum Dry Optimum Density (pcf) Moisture (%) Orange-brown silty sand 132 8.5 t- t Expansion The surface and near-surface soils are non-expansive, sandy materials. September 9, 1989 W.O. G-1013 Page 3 DISCUSSION 1. The site was cleared of surface vegetation and debris prior to compaction. 2. Surface deleterious material was disposed of off site prior to placement of fill. 3. Fill was placed in lifts approximately 8.0 inches thick, moistened as required and compacted with heavy earth-moving equipment. 4. During t'ae course of grading/ loose or porous material wus removed to a competent bottom. The areas were then processed and filled to pad grade with compacted fill. 5. Lot No. 2 is a cut/fill transitional lot. Fill underlies lot Nos. 3 and 7. Lot Nos. 1, 4, 6 and 8 are cut lots. The cut lots expose sandy materials at the surface. 6. The maximum depth of fill on the site is approximately 4.5 feet. 7. As indicated by our test results, the fill was placed in a satisfactory manner. September 9, 1989 W.O. G-1013 Page 4 RECOMMENDATIONS Foundations Footings for the proposed two-story residences should be founded a minimum of 18 inches below the lowermost adjacent grade. A 12- inch by 12-inch grade beam should be used across garage door openings. Recommended footing reinforcement is shown on Plates A and B. All footings should be maintained a minimum of 5.0 feet from the face of the nearest slope. A bearing value of 1500 pounds per square foot may be used for the sandy terrace deposits or compacted fill deposits. The bearing value indicated above is for the total of dead and frequently applied live loads and may be increased by 33 percent for short durations of loading, including the effects of wind and seismic forces. Resistance to lateral load may be provided by friction acting at the base of foundations and by passive earth pressure. A coefficient of friction of 0.35 may be used with dead-load forces. A passive earth pressure of 250 pounds per square foot per foot of depth of fill penetrated to a maximum of 1500 pounds may be used. September 9, 1989 W.O. G-1013 Page 5 Slabs On Grade * Residential slabs on grade should be a minimum of 4.0 inches thick and reinforced with 6x6-10x10 welded wire fabric placed near the center of the slab. The slab should be underlain by a minimum 4-inch sand blanket which incorporates a minimum 6-mil Visqueen or equivalent moisture barrier. Utility trenches underlying the slab may be backfilled with the on-site granular materials. However, sufficiently compacting the backfill deposits may damage or break shallow utility lines. Therefore, minor settlement of the backfill in the trenches is anticipated. To reduce the possibility of cracks occurring, the slab should be provided with additional reinforcement to bridge over the trenches. Drainage Pad water should be directed around the residences and to the street or approved location. Roof water should be collected and transferred to a suitable location via non-erodible devices. Pad water should not be allowed to pond. Plants Fill slopes are generally composed of sandy materials which are susceptible to erosion. Plants should be of a drought-resistant and erosion-controlling variety. Watering of these plants should September 9, 1989 W.O. G-1013 Page 6 be limited to the amount necessary to sustain them. Overzealous watering may result in raveling or surficial failures. Plants and trees should not be planted adjacent to foundations. Sealed planter boxes should be used instead. LIMITATIONS 1) This office assumes no responsibility for alterations made to the slope or pad grades on the subject lots, subsequent to the issuance of this report without our knowledge and written approval. All ramps made through slopes and pads, and other areas of disturbance which require the placement of compacted fill to restore them to the original condition, will not be reviewed unless such backfilling operations are performed under our observation and tested for required compaction. Loose material cast over compacted slopes will negate our certification of slope-face compaction unless the material is removed in accordance with our instructions. 2) We recommend that all utilities be bedded in clean sand to at least one foot above the top of the conduit. The bedding should be flooded in place to fill all the voids around the conduit. On-site material compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction may be utilized for backfill above the bedding. September 9, 1989 W.O. G-1013 Page 7 REGULATORY COMPLIANCE Cuts, fills or processing of original ground under the purview of this report have been completed under the observation of, and with selective testing by A/?Jfr £affry f A$F*>CI and are found to be in compliance with the Grading Code of the city of Carlsbad, California. No certification of compacted fill beyond the limits and grades indicated in this report is intended or implied. Our findings were made and recommendations prepared in conformance with generally accepted professional engineering practices, and no further warranty is implied or made. If you have any questions regarding this report, please do not hesitate to contact this office. This opportunity to be of service is greatly appreciated. Respectfully submitted, September 9, 1989 W.O. G-1013 TEST TEST "ELEVATION MOISTURE DRY RELATIVE DATE NO. LOCATION CONTENT DENSITY COMPACTION PERCENT P.C.F. PERCENT 1 Lot 3 156 5.0 (Natura) 2 W.side of 167 8.2 Cyn.Dr. 3 Lot 7 163 8.0 4 Lot 2 161 7.7 5 Lot 2 162 8.8 6 Lot 3 162 9.1 7 Cyn. Place 163 9.6 8 Lot 7 163.5 10.7 9 Lot 7 164.5 9.8 10 Cyn. Place S.G. 9.0 11 Street S.G. 10.3 99.0 128.7 123.7 121.5 119.6 120.6 122.6 120.1 124.8 120.9 120.3 85.3 97.0 93.0 92.0 90.0 91.0 93.0 91.0 94.0 91.0 91.0 10-12-88 10-12-88 10-13-88 10-14-88 10-18-88 10-18-88 10-1S-88 10-25-88 10-28-88 10-28-88 10-28-89 September 22, 1989 SUBJECT: COMPACTION REPORT FOR STREET UTILITY LINES Canyon Street Carlsbad, California REFERENCE: COMPACTION REPORT Canyon Street Carlsbad, California Prepared by Al Ruden Dated September 9r 1989 Dear This report presents the results of our field density testing and observations during the backfilling operations for utility lines along Canyon Place and Canyon Street. Testing was also conducted in the fill deposits placed behind the crib wall located in the southeastern portion of the site. Field Density test results are presented at the end of this report in Table I. Approximate location of the tests are plotted on the enclosed Site Plan, Plate I. September 22, 1989 W.O. #G1013A Page $ LABORATORY TEST DATA The laboratory standard for determining the maximum dry density was performed in accordance with ASTM D 1557-78. Field density tests were performed in accordance with ASTM D 1556-82. The results of the laboratory maximum dry density for the soil used as compacted fill are summarized below. Maximum Dry Density Optimum Description (p.f.c.) Moisture % Orange- to brown- silty sand 132 8.5 DISCUSSION 1. Fill was place in 8.0- to 10.0-inch lifts above , the conduit bedding. The fill was moistened as required and compacted with a sheepsfoot attached to a tractor-mounted backhoe and by wheel-rolling with heavy earthmoving equipment. 2. The fill was compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of the laboratory maximum dry density. CONCLUSIONS 1. The fill was placed in an adequate manner, as indicated by our test results. September 22, 1989 W.O. #G1013A Pag e 10 2. It is our understanding that only minor grading will be necessary to establish subgrades for Canyon Place. The subgrade should be inspected by a representative of this firm prior to the placement of base materials. This opportunity to be of service is greatly appreciated. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Respectfully submitted, TABLE IT September 22, 1989 W.O. IG1013A Page l\ Test No. 1A 2A 3A 4A 5A 6A 7A 8A 9A 10A 11A 12A 13A 14A Test Location See Map See Map See Map See Map See Map See Map See Map See Map See Map See Map See Map See Map See Map See Map Depth Surface 8" 3" 1" 8" Surface 8" 10" Surface Surface Surface Surface 17" 24" Moisture Content % 9.0 10.0 9.0 10.0 10.0 12.0 9.0 12.0 9.0 9.0 11.0 9.0 11.0 7.0 Density ] (p.c.f.) < 108 122 128 121 124 123 104 98 114 129 112 117 117 118 Relativ Compact 83* 93 98 93 95 94 80* 75* 88* 99 86* 90 90 91 *Removed, recompacted, and retested to greater than 90% of the laboratory maximum density. r t 0 GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR PROPOSED EIGHT LOT SUBDIVISION CANYON STREET CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA C. C PREPARED FOR: Alton L. Ruden 2733 Mesa Drive Oceanside, California C PREPARED BY: KETCHUM ENGINEERING, INC. 7818 Quebrada Circle Carlsbad, California 92009 May 27, 1987 Alton L. Ruden 2733 Mesa Drive Oceanside, California KETCHUM ENGINEERING INC -1836 CALIF. .92009 KE 8738 Report No. 1 Subject: Geotechnical Investigation for a Proposed Eight Lot Subdivision, Canyon Street, Carlsbad, California. Gentlemen: We are pleased to present the results of our geotechnical invest- igations for the subject project. This study was performed in accordance with your request and our proposal dated April 1, 1987, The results of our field investigation and laboratory tests, as well as our conclusions and recommendations, are presented in the accompanying report. We appreciate this opportunity to be of professional service. If you have any questions, you are welcome to contact this office at your convenience. Respectfully Submitted, KETCHUM ENGINEERING, INC. E. N. Ketchum, R.C.E. 26267 President ENK/ct cc: (5) Submitted TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Number INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF PROJECT 2 FIELD INVESTIGATION 3 LABORATORY TESTING 4 FINDINGS 5 Site Description 5 Subsurface Soil Conditions 6 Groundwater 6 CONCLUSIONS 6 RECOMMENDATIONS 7 Site Preparation 7 Cut and Fill Slopes 9 Foundations and Concrete Slabs-On-Grade 10 Pavement 12 Drainage 12 Earth Retaining Structures 12 LIMITATIONS 15 PLATE 1 Vicinity Map PLATE 2 Site Plan PLATE 3 Unified Soil Classification PLATES 4. - 8 Trench Logs PLATE 9 Maximum Density & Optimum Moisture Content/Direct Shear Test Results/ Expansion Test Results PLATE 10 Recommendation for Filling on Sloping Ground APPENDIX A Recommended Grading Specifications c '•••-"•1 1 KE 8738 Page 2 GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR PROPOSED ( EIGHT LOT SUBDIVISION CANYON STREET j CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA a 1 mI9 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of our geotechnical investi- ! gation for the subject site. The vicinity map for this project is presented on Plate Number 1. Plate Number 2 shows the site configuration and the locations of our subsurface explorations. To assist in the preparation of this report, we were provided with a preliminary lot layout that was prepared by Mr. Ruden. PROJECT DESCRIPTION This project is located on the west side of Canyon Street just C north of Basswood, City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, Calif. The site is presently undeveloped and in its natural state. Development of this site is proposed to consist of constructing eight residential lots with a cul-de-sac access road. . ' PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF PROJECT The purpose of this investigation is to develop information re- garding the on-site soil conditions to determine their suitability r to receive the proposed development. <CX The scope of this study includes the following: KETCHUM ENGINEERING INC ijMaitfe; 'it I-T^CT ff KE 8738 Page 3 a) Explore the subsurface conditions to the depths influenced by the proposed construction. b) Evaluate, by laboratory tests, the pertinent en- _ gineering properties of the various strata whichu will influence the development, including their bearing capacities, expansive characteristics and , settlement potential. O c) Define the general geology at the site including possible geologic hazards which could have an ef- fect on the site development. f d) Develop soil engineering criteria for site grading and provide design information regarding the sta- bility of cut and fill slopes. C e) Determine potential construction difficulties and provide recommendations concerning these problems. ( f) Recommend an appropriate foundation system for the type of structures anticipated and develop soil engineering design criteria for the recommended foundations design. C g) Prepare a report that presents our findings, conclu- sions and recommendations. C FIELD INVESTIGATION Our field investigation was conducted on April 27, 1987 and consisted of visual observations of the existing surface condi- tions and completion of five subsurface excavations. These KETCHUM ENGINEERING INC KE 8738 Page 4 excavations were made by means of a backhoe under the observation of our technical personnel. All soils encountered were visually classified in accordance with Unified Soil Classification System that is presented on Plate Number 3. The representative soil samples obtained were transported to the laboratory for testing. Please refer to Plates Numbers 4 through 8 for the field logs. LABORATORY TESTING C Laboratory testing on selected soil samples were completed in conformance with the general practices and procedures as recom- mended by the American Society for Testing and Materials (A.S.T.M.) These tests are briefly outlined below: a. Soil Sample Classification; By visual examination, the sampled soil classifications made in the field ^ were further evaluated in accordance with the Unified Vw Soil Classification System. The final classifications are presented on the exploratory logs. ( b« Field Moisture Content and Dry Soil Density; The moisture content in percent of the soil dry weight and the dry unit weight in pounds per cubic foot were determined for selected soil samples. Please refer , to the exploration logs for the results of these tests. c. Maximum Dry Density and Optimum Moisture Content: In Q accordance with the A.S.T.M. Standard Test D-1557-70, Method A, the maximum dry density, (pounds per cubic foot), and the optimum moisture content, (percent of the dry density), were established on typical samples. Plate Number 9 presents the results of these tests. KETCHUM ENGINEERING INC KE 8738 Page 5 f d. Direct Shear Test; Direct shear tests were performed to determine the failure envelope based on yield shear strength. The shear box was designed to accommodate \ : a sample having diameters of 2.375 inches or 2.50 A inches and a height of 1.0 inch. Samples were tested at different vertical loads and at saturated moisture content. The shear stress was applied at a constant . rate of strain of approximately 0.05 inches per minute. (- The results of these tests are presented on attached Plate Number 9. e. Expansion Index; The expansion index was determined (_ for selected soil samples in accordance with the Uni- form Building Code Standard No. 29-2 to determine their expansive potential. Please refer to Plate Number 9 for the results of these tests. C FINDINGS SITE DESCRIPTION ( The site is an irregular parcel of land that is characterized by a drainage swale that runs south to north across the central portions of the site. The eastern and western side of the swale C is drained by sheet flow towards the swale. Residential property is present to the south and west with open-land to the north. Canyon Street provides the eastern border. The site is capped with a moderate growth of grass. No man-made structures are G present on-site. KETCHUM ENGINEERING INC r - ••-'•.-••;' KE 8738 Page 6 SUBSURFACE SOIL CONDITIONS 0 This parcel is capped with from about one (1) to three (3) feet ? of a reddish-brown, silty sandy topsoil/slopewash material that • is dry to humid and loose in consistency. Medium dense to dense j silty sandstones, typical of the local Terrace Deposits, are present beneath the topsoils and slopewash. These materials are several tens of feet in thickness and have a low expansive ! potential. GROUNDWATER Based on our investigation, we do not believe that a shallow groundwater table exists at the site. No water table was en- countered in any of the test trenches. We do not, therefore, anticipate any major groundwater related problems, either during _ or after construction. However, it should be recognized that minor groundwater seepage problems may occur after development of a site even where none were present before development. These are usually minor phenomena and are often the result of an alteration of the permeability characteristics of the soil, an alteration in drainage patterns and an increase in irriga- tion water. Based on the permeability characteristics of the soil and the anticipated usage of the development, it is our opinion that minor seepage problems may occur at random locations. It is further our opinion that these problems can be most effect- ively corrected on an individual basis if and when they develop. ,* CONCLUSIONS^, i^^^•_ Based on the findings of this study, we conclude that with res- pect to geotechnical aspects, the subject site is suitable for the proposed project provided the recommendations contained in KETCHUM ENGINEERING INC e KE 8738 Page 7 this report are fully complied with. The on-=-site soils were determined to have a low expansive po- tential and, therefore, should not require special foundation design consideration. The upper topsoils and slopewash materials are loose and not suitable to receive structural loads. We, therefore, recommend that they be removed and replaced as an engineered fill prior to the placement of any new fill or structural building loads. RECOMMENDATIONS SITE PREPARATION PRECQNSTRUCTION CONFERENCE; We recommend that a preconstruction conference be held at the site with the developer, civil engineer, contractor, and geotechnical engineer in attendance. Special soil handling and the grading plans can be discussed at that time. SPECIFICATIONS; We recommend that all earthwork be done in ac- cordance with the attached "Recommended Grading Specifications." Ketchum Engineering, Inc., should observe the grading and test compacted fills. ' . . All special site preparation recommendatioas presented in this report will supercede those in the standard Recommended Grading Specifications. All embankments, structural fill and fill should be compacted to not less than 90 percent of the maximum laboratory density. Utility trench backfill within five (5) feet of the proposed structures and beneath asphalt pavements should be com- pacted to not less than 90 percent of its maximum dry density. The maximum dry density of each soil type should be determined in accordance with A.S.T.'M. Test Method 1557-70. KETCHUM ENGINEERING INC KE 8738 Page 8 DEMOLITIONS, CLEARING AND GRUBBING; During site preparation, all debris and deleterious materials derived from demolition, clearing and grubbing operations should be legally disposed of J off-site prior to grading. Any existing utilities that will not • be utilized should be removed and properly capped at the proper- l ty lines. The removal of trees should include the removal of their roots. The depressions resulting from the above opera- tion should be backfilled with soil that has been compacted to at least 90% relative compaction. C GENERAL; Beneath all areas to receive fill, structural loads, sidewalks, or pavements, we recommend that the topsoils .and fill be removed to firm, natural ground and stockpiled for future use. It is anticipated that firm, natural ground will be encountered from about one (1) to three (3) feet below the existing surface. Firm, natural ground is defined as soil that possesses an in-place density equal to, or greater than, 85%C of its maximum dry density. The bottom of the excavation should be scarified to a depth of at least six (6) inches, watered as required, and densified to at least 90%. The stockpiled soils may then be replaced and compacted to at least 90% in six (6) to eight (8) inch lifts to desired grade. TRANSITION AREAS: We recommend that the cut area beneath struc- tures be undercut to a minimum depth of one (1) foot below the base of the deepest footing. This recommendation is submitted in an attempt to reduce the potential distress that could arise from footings founded partially on cut and partially on fill. ^ MOISTURE CONTENT OF FILL SOILS: All fill soils placed should have moisture contents of at least 2% over optimum moisture content. KETCHUM ENGINEERING INC KE 8738 Page 9 AREAS TO BE PAVED: All areas to be paved should have the sub- grade soils densified to at least 90% relative compaction to a minimum-depth of 12 inches. It is suggested that the upper 12 * inches of subgrade soils be comprised of granular select, non- • expansive materials.!• IMPORT MATERIALS; Any fill material to be imported on-site should consist of granular, non-expansive soil that contains no organic or deleterious materials. It should have sufficient cohesion to hold a vertical or near vertical cut for footing excavations. It should have at least 85% of the material passing the Number 4 sieve with no rocks or chunks larger than one and one-half (1j) inches. The import fill should be approved by our office prior to on-site delivery. CUT AND FILL SLOPES C It is our opinion that the cut and fill slopes constructed from the native on-site materials will be stable with relation to deep- seated failures if constructed at or flatter than the following recommended slope ratios expressed in the horizontal or vertical units for the indicated heights: Cut Slopes to 20 Feet in Height 2:1 L Fill Slopes to 20 Feet in Height 2:1 The above maximum heights were determined by using a factor of safety of 1.5. . f \ia.' It is also recommended that footings not be founded nearer than eight (8) feet measured horizontally inward from the face of the slopes. Slopes should be planted with erosion resisting plants and natural drainage should be directed away from the top of all slopes such that no water 'is allowed to flow over the top. KETCHUM ENGINEERING INC KE 8738 Page 10 TEMPORARY SLOPE STABILITY; The following table presents recom- mendations relative to temporary construction excavations. These slopes -should be relatively stable against deep-seated failures but may experience localized sloughing. Slope Ratio Maximum Height of Temporary (Horizontal to Vertical) Excavation (Feet) 0.25 : 1 12 Vertical 5 It should be the contractor's responsibility to provide safe support for the excavation. No heavy equipment should be al- lowed adjacent to the top of the temporary cuts. FOUNDATIONS AND CONCRETE SLABS-ON-GRADE: GENERAL; We recommend the structure proposed for this project be supported by a continuous spread footing foundation system as recommended below. The following recommendations are sub- mitted provided the soils within the upper three (3) feet from finish grade have a low expansive potential. a) All footings for one and two story structures should be founded a minimum of 12 and 18 inches, respectively, below adjacent finish grade. Footings should have a minimum width of 12 inches. _ b) Both exterior and interior continuous footings should be reinforced with one No. 4 bar positioned three (3) inches above the bottom of the footings and one No. 4- bar positioned three (3) inches clear below finish floor. KETCHUM ENGINEERING INC SH3K KE 8138 Page 11 c) Interior slabs should be not less than three and one-half (3h) inches in thickness, underlain by a four (4) inch blanket of clean concrete sand or crushed rock, reinforced with 6"x6"-#10/#10 welded wire mesh and completely surrounded with a continuous footing. Number 3 ties should be placed at 4-8 inches on center from the slab to the footing. d) Exterior slabs should be a minimum of three and one-half (3k) inches in thickness and should be reinforced with 6"x6"-#10/#10 welded wire mesh. e) Surface drainage should be directed away from the proposed foundation. Planters should be constructed so that water is not allowed to seep beneath founda- tions or slabs. Over-irrigation of areas adjacent to foundations and slabs should be avoided. f) Prior to placing steel or concrete, the foundation excavations should be inspected by a representative of this office to insure that the above recommenda- tions have been followed. BEARING VALUE; An allowable soil bearing value of 2000 pounds per square foot for spread footing foundations may be used for design of the on-site structures. This bearing value should be verified for all soil conditions under all building pads. In our opinion this value can be increased by one-third for loads that include wind or seismic forces. SETTLEMENT CHARACTERISTICS; The anticipated total and/or dif- ferential settlements for the proposed structure may be consid- ered to be within tolerable limits provided the recommendations in this report are followed. KETCHUM ENGINEERING INC Ke 8738 Page 12 PAVEMENT After the site is graded and the subgrade soils are exposed in the parking and driveway areas, we recommend that these soils be sampled and tested so that pavement recommendations may be made. However, the following recommendations are submitted as prelim- inary guidelines for pavement construction. The subgrade soils to a depth of at least 12 inches should be densified to at least 90%. Paved areas should be protected from moisture migrating under the pavement from adjacent water sources such as planted or grass areas. Saturation of the subbase soils could result in pavement failures. Further, all paving materials and methods of construction should conform with good grading practices and with the minimum require- ments ©f the governing agency. DRAINAGE We recommend that positive measures be taken to properly finish grade the pads once improvements and landscape are in place so that.drainage waters are directed off the pads and away from possible foundations, floor slabs, and slope tops. No areas of ponded water should be allowed to exist.' EARTH RETAINING STRUCTURES GENERAL; It is our understanding that the small retaining struc- tures that are proposed for this project will be of masonry con- struction. KETCHUM ENGINEERING INC KE 8738 Page 13 ULTIMATE ACTIVE PRESSURE: The ultimate soil pressure for the design of earth retaining structures with level backfills may be assumed to be equivalent to the pressure of a fluid weighing 36 pounds per cubic foot for walls free to yield at the top (unrestrained walls). For walls restrained at the top, a fluid pressure of 4-6 p.c.f. may be used. These pressures do not con- sider any surcharge loading. If any surcharge loadings are anticipated, this office should be contacted for the necessary increase in soil pressure. All earth retaining structures should have adequate weep holes or a subdrain system to prevent the buildup of hydrostatic pressure behind the wall. ULTIMATE PASSIVE PRESSURE; The passive pressure for prevailing soil conditions may be considered to be 360 pounds per square foot per foot of depth. This pressure may be increased one- third for seismic loading. The coefficient of friction for concrete to soil may be assumed to be 0.4-0 for the resistance to lateral movement. When combining frictional and passive resistance, the latter should be reduced by one-third. ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING PRESSURE; The foundation for the proposed retaining structures should consist of spread footings founded in the firm, native soils or compacted fill. Firm, natural ground is defined as soil having an in-situ density of at least 85% of its maximum dry density. Footings may be designed for an allow- able bearing pressure of 2000 p.s.f. FACTOR OF SAFETY; The above values, with the exception of the allowable soil bearing pressure, do not include a factor of safety. Appropriate factors of safety should be incorporated into the design of all earth retaining structures to reduce the possibility of overturning and sliding. KETCHUM ENGINEERING INC KE 8738 Page U BACKFILL; All backfill soils should be compacted to at least 90% relative compaction. Expansive or clayey soils should not be used-for backfill material within a distance of five (5) feet from the back of the wall. The retaining structure should not be backfilled until the materials in the wall have reachedean adequate strength. KETCHUM ENGINEERING INC. r*»„• KE 8738 Page 15 LIMITATIONS The recommendations presented in this report are contingent upon our review of final plans and specifications. The soil engineer should review and verify the compliance of the final grading plan with this report. It is recommended that Ketchum Engineering, Inc., be retained to provide continuous soil engineering services during the earth- work operations. This is to observe compliance with the design concepts, specifications or recommendations and to allow design changes in the event that subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to start of construction. The recommendations and opinions expressed in this report reflect our best estimate of the project requirements based on an eval- uation of the subsurface soil conditions encountered at the sub- surface exploration locations and the assumption that the soil conditions do not deviate appreciably from those encountered. It should be recognized that the performance of the foundations may be influenced by undisclosed or unforeseen variations in the soil conditions that may occur in the intermediate and unex- plored areas. Any unusual conditions not covered in this report that may be encountered during site development should be brought to the attention of the soil engineer so that he may make mod- ifications if necessary. This office should be advised of any changes in the project scope or proposed site grading so that it may be determined if the recommendations contained herein are appropriate. This should be verified in writing or modified by a written addendum. The findings of this report are valid as of this date. Changes in the condition of a property can, however, occur with the passage of time, whether they be due to natural processes or the work of man on this or adjacent properties. In addition, changes KETCHUM ENGINEERING INC. K-E 8738 Page 16 in the state-of-the-art and/or government codes may occur. Due to such changes, the findings of this report may be invalidated wholly or in part by changes beyond our control. Therefore, this report should not be relied upon after a period of two years without a review by us verifying the suitability, the con- clusions, and recommendations. In the performance of bur professional services, we comply with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of our profession currently practicing under similar conditions and in the same locality. The client recognizes that subsurface con- ditions may vary from those encountered at the locations where our borings, surveys, and explorations are made, and that our data, interpretations and recommendations are based solely on the information obtained by us. We will be responsible for those data, interpretations and recommendations, but shall not be res- ponsible for the interpretations by others of the information developed. Our services consist of professional consultation and observation only, and no warranty of any kind whatsoever, expressed or implied, is made or intended in connection with the work performed or to be performed by us, or by our proposal for consulting or other services, or by our furnishing of oral or written reports or findings. It is the responsibility of the owners, or their representative to ensure that the information and recommendations contained herein are brought to the attention of the engineer and arch- itect for the project and incorporated into the project's plans and specifications. It is further their responsibility to take the necessary measures to ensure that the contractor and his subcontractors carry out such recommendations during construc- tion. Inspection services allow the testing of only a very small per- centage of the fill placed at the site. Contractural arrange- ments with the grading contractor should contain the provision KETCHUM ENGINEERING INC. "KE 8738 Page 17 that he is responsible for excavating, placing and compaction of fill in accordance with the project specifications. In- spection by the geotechnical engineer during grading should not relieve -the grading contractor of his primary responsibility to perform all work in accordance with the specifications. This firm does not practice nor consult in the field of safety engineering. We do not direct the contractor's operations, and we cannot be responsible for the safety of other than our own personnel on the site; therefore, the safety of others is the responsibility of the contractor. The contractor should notify the owner if he considers any of the recommended actions presented herein to be unsafe. KETCHUM ENGINEERING INC. SITE VICINITY MAP B Y: ENK JOB NO. 8738 KETCHUM ENGINEERING INC. 7818 QUEBRAOA CIRCLE. CARLSBAD (619)944-1836 92008 DATE: 6/1/87 PLATE NO. 1 e Backhoe Trench SITE PLAN BY' ENK KETCHUM ENGINEERING INC. 7818 QUEBRADA CIRCLE. CARLSBAD (619)944-1836 92008 Itil JOB NO. 8738 DATE: 6/1/87 PLATE NO. 2 UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION MAJOR DIVISIONS -i ' <f> 2 o=J t! o0 5 «* "> 2d O jfc 2 luLU O _ Nl ? U. < W<• _i x§ < P £0 z tt £s I! " O iijO oc w 53 fc {£ §^ 0 uj W 8 - * *O £«/»«/> S 1 - g * "20 »S2s ll <C 52jE GRAVELS MORE THAN HALF OF COARSE FRACTION IS LARGER THAN NO. 4 SIEVE SANDS MORE THAN HALF OF COARSE FRACTION IS SMALLER THAN NO. 4 SIEVE CLEAN GRAVELS (LESS THAN 5% FINES) GRAVEL WITH FINES CLEAN SANOS (LESS THAN 5% FINES) SANDS WITH FINES SILTS AND CLAYS LIQUID LIMIT IS LESS THAN SOX SILTS AND CLAYS LIQUID LIMIT IS GREATER THAN 50% HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS GROUP SYMBOL GW GP GM GC sw SP SM sc ML CL OL MH CH OH Pt TYPICAL NAMES Well graded gravels, gravel-sand matures. Mile or no tines. PooJly graded gravels or gravel-sand mixtures, little or no lutes. Silly gravels, gravel-sand-sill mixture*, non-plastic lines. Clayey gravels, gravel-sand-clay mixtures, plastic lines. Well graded sands, gravelly sands, little or no lines. Poorly graded sands or gravelly sands, little or no lire*. Silly sands, sand-silt mixtures, non-plastic fines. Clayey sands, sand-clay mixtures, plastic lines. Inorganic silts and very line sands, rock Hour, silly orclayey line sands or Clayey sills with slight plasticity. Inorganic clays ol tow lo medium plasticity, gravelly clays, sandy clays, silly clays, lean clays. Organic silts and organic silly clays ol low plasticity. Inorganic silts micaceous or diatomaceous fine candy orsilty soils, elastic silts. Inorganic clays of high plasticity, fat Clays. Organic clays ol medium to high plasticity, organic sills. Peal and other highly organic soils. GRAIN SIZE 2C ^11 TQ A Kin C\ AY<5 u.s. a X) 4 FINE I/UVUAMU it Mlt5 0 X SAND MEDIUM aitvt 3 4 COARSE CLtAH SUUAHt I 3/4i 3 GRAVEL FINE I COARSE SIEVE on " 1 f~V\QQI CCIrUoDLca NINGS Z" RTU II nFR<%Duuujcnd RELATIVE DENSITY CONSISTENCY SANDS.GRAVELS AND NON- PLASTIC SILTS VERY LOOSE LOOSE MEDIUM DENSE DENSE VERY DENSE BLOWS/FOOT 0-4 4-10 10-30 30-50 OVER 50 CLAYS AND PLASTIC SILTS VERY SOFT SOFT FIRM STIFF VERY STIFF HARD STRENGTH 0-1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 1 - 2 2-4 OVER 4 BLOWS/FOOT 0-2 2-4 4 - 8 8-16 16-33 OVER 32 Water level at time of excavation or as indicated /\ Undisturbed driven ring or chunk sample f~| Disturbed bulk sample BY; ENK KETCHUM ENGINEERING INC-fT^ 7818 QUEBRADA CIRCLE. C A R L S B A D i] |f=wl (619)944-1836 92008 Hjl KB JOB NO. 8738 DATE: 6/1/87 PLATE NO. 3 c z Ul O 0 - .1 - 2 - 3 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - • 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - U-SAMPLE TYPE 1A P SOIL 1CLASSIFICATION 1SM_ SM . TRENCH NUMBER T-1 ELEVATION DESCRIPTION Red. fine sands (slight day bird.) QAF Red. med. sands w/ferous nodules BOTTOM APPARENTMOISTURE<Dry Moist Humid -APPARENTCONSISTENCYOR DENSITYMed. Dens Med. Dens Dense •• t- M il K O » 1U.1||%| XN91N03aunisiOM8.8 •RELATIVE 1COMPACTION^! 1- — - — - — - - - ..V "• — — — — BY: ENK JOB NO. 8738 KETCHUM ENGINEERING INC.[TJ£ DATE 6/1/87 7818 QUEBRADA CIRCLE, CARLSBAD* *=S (619)944-1836 9 2 O O 8 |H| !B§ PLATE NO. 4. ' ( c z & HI 1 - 2 - JA' 4 - 5 - 1 6 - 7 - 8 - - 10 - 11 - 12 - L3 - U- tu *• Ul 0. 4 (A P A "-•^ zo _i O o 5 *" w< u SM ML SM ML SM ^^ TRENCH NUMBER T-2 ELEVATION DESCRIPTION Red/brown silty sand w/trace clay Red/brown silty sand porous Choc. brown silty sand (alluv.) Red sand w/ferous nodul* Slightly porous NG. Red/gray fine to med. sand BOTTOM 1™ Ul c 3 < M £ O< 9 Dry Damp Damp s Moist Moist B!E u W M « £ uja — A^ n a* K * 0 0U Loose Med.Densf Med. Dense Med.Denst Med. Dens • • j: s _ o I^ KO .89.8 112. A 5 5 sS 5 5 za ou 5.6 10.1 w o2 I! < < IK a « 0o — — - - *•" »_ - - . - - - — - BY: ENK JOB NO. 8738 KETCHUM ENGINEERING INC.[TJ£ DATE: 6/1/37 7818 QUEBRAOA CIRCLE. C A R L S B A D 1 1|| B-J I (619)944-1836 9 2 0 0 8 ILJSi PLATE NO. J | £ xi-o. UJo 0 - 1 - 2 - 3 - *: 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - • 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 1-3 -SAMPLE TYPE 1A SOIL 1CLASSIFICATION 1— . TRENCH NUMBER T-3 ELEVATION DESCRIPTION Red med. sands (alluv.) Red w/gray streaks NG. - BOTTOM APPARENTMOISTURE^Dry Damp Humid APPARENTCONSISTENCYOR DENSITYDense Dense Dense -• > H M X _ Ml • ° 1>. "" •0 116.9 I|%| XN31NOOaunxsioN'6.2 RELATIVE 1COMPACTION!*! 1- _> - - — - - - — .•v ~ - - — — BY: ENK JOB NO 8738 KETCHUM ENGINEERING INC.ffrJ^ DATE: 6/1/87 7818 QUEBRADA CIRCLE. C A fl L S B A D U | fpJ (619)944-1836 fl 2 Q Q a H III KB PLATE NO. £ I * c z iuo 0 - 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - • 13 -SAMPLE TYPE 1A SOIL 1CLASSIFICATION 1- TRENCH NUMBER T-4. ELEVATION DESCRIPTION Red med. sand (alluv.) Red w/gray streaks NG. BOTTOM APPARENTMOISTUREiDry Damp Humid APPARENTCONSISTENCYOR DENSITYDense Dense Dense * J-M 0 * K O II «l XN31NO3aunistoMRELATIVE 1COMPACTIONS! 1- _ — - .. - - - — - — - ^^ — BY: ENK JOB NO. 8738 KETCHUM ENGINEERING INC.[T|£ DATE: 6/1/37 7818 QUEBRADA CIRCLE, C A RLSB AD||-=« (619)944-1836 9 2 Q Q a B III IB PLATE NO. 7 e ' » .1" c zHa.wO 0 - • 1 - • 2 - 3 - • 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - • 10 - 11 - 12 - L3 - H - 13 -SAMPLE TYPE 1A SOIL 1CLASSIFICATION 1SM CH SM TRENCH NUMBER T-5 ELEVATION DESCRIPTION Red/brown QAF Red clay w/sand (colluv.! Red/orange med. sand/ sandstone (refer to T-1 samples) (N.G.) BOTTOM APPARENTMOISTUREiDry Moist Humid APPARENTCONSISTENCYOR DENSITYLoose Dense Dense >H> « *!> 0 116*4-MOISTURE ICONTENT 1%I 110.7 RELATIVE 1COMPACTION!*! 1_ .. — - .. ^ - - - - ..*». •• - - — — BY: ENK JOB NO. 8738 j KETCHUM ENGINEERING INC. [FT? DATE: 6/1/37 7818 QUEBRADA CIRCLE, CARLSBAD I «{ (619)944-1836 9 2 0 0 8 IUILJ5 PLATE NO. Q MAXIMUM DENSITY & OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT AST*: Sample T1 @ 3-4 - Description Reddish brown silty fine to med. sand ' Maximum DensityIpclJ 116.0 Optimum ISi"""* 12.0 DIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS Sample T1 § 3-4 Description Remolded to 90% Angto of InUrnal Friction I *) 31 CohMion InUrctpt(p*f) 50 EXPANSION TEST RESULTS Sample CONDITION INITIAL M.C.IX) INITIAL DENSITY (pcf) FINAL M£. Ul NORMAL STRESS IpsfJ EXPANSION -INDEX T1 @ 3-4 17 BY: ENK K ETC HUM ENGINEERING INC.fjnS 7818 QUEBRAOA CIRCLE. C ARLSBADll mal (619)944-1836 Q 2 Q Q fl I III BS JOB NO. 8738 DATE: 6/1/87 PLATE NO. 9 EXISTING GROUND SURFACE ZONE OF LOOSE xSURFACE SOIL COMPACTED FILL. TOE KEY 2 FT. MIN. INTO FIRM GROUND HORIZONTAL BENCHES INTO FIRM GROUND, 6 FT. MIN. 'TOE KEY WIDTH TO BE DETERMINED BY SOIL ENGINEER, BUT NOT LESS THAN 10 FT. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FILLING SLOPING GROUND ON Schematic only net to scale BY:ENK JOB NO. 8738 KETCHUM ENGINEERING INC. 7818 QUEBRADA (619) 944-1836 CIRCLE .C A RLSB AD 92008 DATE: 6/1/87 PLATE NO. 10 APPENDIX A RECOMMENDED GRADING SPECIFICATIONS General latent The intent of these specifications is to establish procedures for clearing, compacting natural ground, preparing areas to be filled and placing and compacting fill soil to the lines and grades shown on the accepted plans. The recommendations con- tained in the preliminary soil investigation report are a part of the recommended grading specifications and shall supersede the provisions contained hereinafter in the case of conflict. Inspection and Testing A qualified soil engineer shall be employed to observe and test the earthwork in accordance with these specifications. It will be necessary that the soil engineer or his representative pro- vide adequate observations so that he may provide a memorandum that the work was or was not accomplished as specified. Deviations from these specifications will be permitted only upon written authorization from the soil engineer. It shall be the responsi- bility of the contractor to assist the soil engineer and to keep him appraised of work schedules, changes and new information and data so that he may provide the memorandum to the owner and govern- mental agency, as required. If in the opinion of the soil engineer, substandard conditions are encountered, such as questionable soil, poor moisture control, inadequate compaction, adverse weather, etc., the contractor shall stop construction until the conditions are remedied or corrected. Unless otherwise specified, fill material shall be compacted by the contractor while at a moisture content near the optimum KETCHUM ENGINEERING INC moisture content to a density that is not less than 90% of the. maximum dry density determined in accordance with A.S.T.M. Test No. D 1557-70, or other density test methods that will obtain equivalent^results. Clearing and Preparation of Areas to Receive Fill e All trees, brush, grass, and other objectionable material shall be collected, piled, and burned or otherwise disposed of by the contractor so as to leave the areas that have been cleared with a neat and finished appearance free from unsightly debris. All vegetable matter and objectionable material shall be removed by the contractor from the surface upon which the fill is to be placed, and any loose or porous soils shall be removed or com- pacted to the depth determined by the soil engineer. The surface shall then be plowed or scarified to a minimum depth of 6 inches until the surface is free from uneven features that would tend to i prevent uniform compaction by the equipment to be used. When the slope of the natural ground receiving fill exceeds 20% (5 horizontal to 1 vertical), the original ground shall be stepped or benched as shown on the attached Plate A. Benches shall be cut to a firm competent soil condition. The lower bench shall be at least 10 feet wide and all other benches at least 6 feet wide. Ground slopes flatter than 20% shall be benched when considered necessary by the soil engineer. Fill Material < Materials for compacted fill shall consist of any material import- ed or excavated from the cut areas that, in the opinion of the soil engineer, is suitable for use in constructing fills. The material shall contain no rocks or hard lumps greater than 12 inches in size KETCHUM ENGINEERING INC. and shall contain at least 40% of material smaller than 1/4 inch in size. (Materials greater than 6 inches in size shall be placed by the contractor so that they are surrounded by compacted fines; no nesting of rocks shall be permitted.) No material of a perish- able, spongy, or otherwise improper nature shall be used in filling, Material placed within 36 inches of rough grade shall be select material that contains no rocks or hard lumps greater then 6 inches in size and that swells less than 3% when compacted as hereinafter specified for compacted fill and soaked under an axial pressure of 150 psf. Potentially expansive soils may be used in fills below a depth of 36 inches and shall be compacted at a moisture content greater than the optimum moisture content for the material. Placing Spreading and Compacting of Fill Approved material^ shall be placed in areas prepared to receive fill in layers not to exceed six inches in compacted thickness. Each layer shall have a uniform moisture content in the range that will allow the compaction effort to be efficiently applied to achieve the specified degree of compaction to a minimum spec- ified density with adequately sized equipment, either specifically designed for soil compaction or of proven reliability. Compaction shall be continuous over the entire area, and the equipment shall make sufficient trips to insure that the desired density has been obtained throughout the entire fill. When the moisture content of the fill material is below that speci- fied by the soil engineer, the fill material shall be aerated by the contractor by blading, mixing, or other satisfactory methods until the moisture content is as specified. KETCHUM ENGINEERING INC The surface of fill slopes shall be compacted and there shall be no excess loose soil on the slopes. Inspection Observation and compaction tests shall be made by the soil engin- eer during the filling and compacting operations so that he can state his opinion that the fill was constructed in accordance with the specifications. The soil engineer shall make field density tests in accordance with A.S.T.M. Test No. D1556-70. Density tests shall be made in the com- pacted materials below the surface where the surface is disturbed. When these tests indicate that the density of any layer of fill or portion thereof is below the specified density, the particular layer portion shall be reworked until the specified density has been obtained. The location and frequency of the tests shall be at the soil engin- eer's discretion. In general, the density tests will be made at an interval not exceeding two feet in vertical rise and/or 500 cubic yards of embankment. Protection of Work / During construction, the contractor shall properly grade all exca- vated surfaces to provide positive drainage and prevent ponding of. water. He shall control surface water to avoid damage to adjoin- ing properties or to finished work on the site. The contractor shall take remedial measures to prevent erosion of freshly graded areas and until such time as permanent drainage and erosion control features have been installed. KETCHUM ENGINEERING INC. > 1 f- Unforeseen Condition In the event that conditions are encountered during the site pre- paration and construction that were not encountered during the pre- liminary soil investigation, Ketchum Engineering, Inc., assumes no responsibility for conditions encountered which differ from those conditions found and described in the preliminary soil investiga- tion report. KETCHUM ENGINEERING INC CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE . CITY OF CARLSBAD ; Plan Check No. DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING SERVICES DIVISION " " 2075 LAS PALMAS CARLSBAD, CA 92309 (619) 438-1161 I This form shall be used to determine the amount of school fees for a project and to verifv that the project applicant has complied -with the school fee requirements. Xo buildins permits for the projects shall be issued until the certification is signed by the appropriate school district and returned to-'the City of Carlsbad Building Department. SCHOOL DISTRICT: */ Carlsbad Unified , San Marco Unified 801 Pine Avenue . 1290 West San Marcos Blvd. Carlsbad, CA 92009 (434-0610) San Marcos, CA 92024 (744-4776) Encinitas Union Elementary San Dieguito Union High School 189 Union Street 710 Encinitas Boulevard •Encinitas, CA 92024 (944-4306) Encinitas, CA 92024 (753-6491) Project Applicant: x&a*JbJLJ *£."&£**<*****&*•— '' APN; s$O£> - ~ g>go :-i ?5 ' -~£^ ' Q ~' -"to- Project Address: //sJ3 Q C/^H/f/^*^ \jL^C^_ '*>-**__ ^ " ^frfOi ac RESIDENTIAL: SQ. FT. of living area jjO^T " Number of dwelling units SQ. FT. of covered area SQ. FT. of garage area COMMERCIAL/ INDUSTRIAL: SQ. FT. AREA'__ Prepared By _ -^^ \J-*Ls*»j* -- ' _ Date _ \J&-*Ls*»j* -- ' FEE CERTIFICATION (To be completed by the School District) Applicant has complied with fee requirement under Government Code 53080 Project is subject to an existing fee agreement Project is exempt from Government Code 53080 Final Map approval and construction started before September 1, 1986. (other school fees paid) Other Residential Fee Levied: $ °^L *S~? *S - (o^ based on ^^ ^lG sq. ft.@ ^P (• 5 Comm/Itfidu6t.| F^^^Xar^iedj:^ $ based on sq. ft.@ V . '.•^-«!l t ri£. / s " L'r-~ ~" — -- -• School District Official/TitleDate AB 2926 and SB 201 fees are capped at $1.58 per square foot for residential. AB 2926 is capped at $.26 per square foot for commercial/industrial. ^4 C. Account No. 33o-d/Q-/g-Z/ Amount of Refund Date Fee Paid: . I CITY OF CARLSBAD REQUEST FOR REFUND CC? Vendor No. Facts Supporting Request: Fee Paid For: Fee Paid By: £><+.*d - I Kl - 1 i £.0 C.T os\ / 7//y9S f- Name of Applicant: f / ^^ Nli'c,Y\ae,l 14.n ^£v ^k.e-rnrv>(Sr IW Address: "?7Z£> f~/CJ\ Street SO/-/G.City State Zip Telephone Signature of Applicant:Date Dept. Justification: &*? >/ *%%0C. D Approve Finance Investigation: D Approve City Manager's Action: _JD Approve f * / D D D - ?*,$ Disapprove Disapprove Disapprove DO ^L^^ Dept. Head Signature M(\C\ *** c City Manag*er Signature^J~ ikl/^ 1 C/ate Date Date GALEY AND KEMMERLY HOMES January 22, 1932 City of Carlsbad 2Q75 Las Palmas Dr. Carlsbad, CA. 92009 Attn: Building Department RE: Building Permit # CB910294 Gent 1emen: We recently discovered that we had been charged $1,575.00 for the referenced permit for "Park in Lieu" Fee. ! am enclosing a cop> of the ~eceipt for the Permit and Fees which were paid on 8/5/91. The "Park in Lieu" fees for the entire subdivision, CT 85-13, had been paid at the time of Final Map. ! am enclosing a copy of tne receipt for the payment which was made on 7/1/88 for the seven undeveloped lets on Canyon Place, CT 85-13. we would appreciate your review of this matter and reimbursement fcr the $1,575. We apologize for any inconvience this oversight has caused. Ga 1 ey and Kemmer 1 y Homes ., Inc. Michael H. Galey MHG/wc jlfivt/ 7720 EL CAMINO REAL, SUITE 2M, LA COSTA, CA 92009 (619) 632-8032 * > '12 vt.'tS"' * .ivy1' v ~i" -•;»'• • j * >• wt •' ; - •' .'* ii' ' i • • : r^Tc -1 • • ~ ' A • £«™P.>> , **• -. ^r»j*^TJT ^^* • ^' ^r" ^ JT ••' •f I ' - ..;••.-* • - ' • ; - • • ••;.- " ,.,... ^'^•^^ :-'>''•>••:^}\^'-:'f^:^^t>^ri^^:'^Y^'''^: "'a^:wv';!-i:i;;':^"k«^:;;'vp;v':! ^, ••^&Q^^W&?-PATE-^iW;u*^^ •"•'••':! •wr-TT'^fKM;':;.iV *,.><.'"• -f' j :-::v;- >'f :<•-.'. ,->' , ,, •• -f -.'Vj.:i ,',.'• • / •'•'.''. -,' ':- • ' ••' • •;07/01/80' 0001 0.1 "05 . . . i . • . ... ..,- -x^^ '-*~ '''• '' - '•''';: ';:; . '•""/•:;: iHi!8 *» »|!i ' ' ii L » - g ^!iiii i 1' I1?i 1 ill 30 O of *•Sm. r- B U 1 L D I N G PERMIT 06/03/92 14:06 Page 1 of 1 J ob Addr e s s : 1830 CANYON P L Permit Type: PLAN CHECK REVISION Parcel No: 20r:>-080-85-UO Valuation: 0 Construction Type: VN Occupancy Group: R3 Referenced: Description: CHANGE FLOOR JOISTS Appl/Ownr : CARLSBAD CANYON PLACE LTD 7720 EL CAMINO REAL CARL S BAD, CA 920 0' A** Fees Required * * Su i t e : Lot* : PCR No: PCR91069 Project No: A9i:;0;i64 Development No : 7920 06/03/92 0001 01 02 C-PRMT 104.00 6368072 Status: PENDING Applied : :'. 0/08/9 I Apr/ls'jue : Validated 3y : CD Fee description "v cted & Credit: Fees : Adjustments: Total Fees: Plan Check Revisioii*F«M» . U u . 0 C 1 0 4 . 0 U Ext fee Data 104.00 1EARANCE CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 ESGIL CORPORATION 932O CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) 56O-1468 DATE:O - 2 — -^ / JURISDICTION: PLAN CHECK NO: PROJECT ADDRESS; PROJECT NAME: 7"M ' O g> SET; PLANCHECKERQFILE COPY QUPS (J DESIGNER D D D D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficien- cies identified _ are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corp. until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to return to the applicant contact person. \ } The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: I j — Esgil staff did not advise the applicant contact person that plan check has been completed. Esgil staff did advise applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: _ Date contacted: REMARKS; -TO Telephone # By;ESGIL CORPORATION DGA DCM Enclosures: > ^ Datet Jurisdiction Prepared byi VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE Q Bldg. Dept, D Esgil PLAN CHECK NO. BUILDING ADDRESS __ APPLICANT/CONTACT . BUILDING OCCUPANCY PHONE NO.1 DESIGNER PHONE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION-'1/-/J CONTRACTOR PHONE BUILDING PORTION IZ&Vl^lOlJ T &F- f- Air Conditionine Commercial Residential Res. or Comm. Fire Sprinklers Total Value BUILDING AREA } O£.l&'fiJ&L t/^A/5 •* VALUATION MULTIPLIER ,c^ frpPl ^ § e @ VALUE Z4</<TD S&~T • • • Building Permit Fee $ Plan Check Fee S ftgC<* I C 0 H HE NTSs &*> Y. \ , SHEET OF 12/87 BY DATE PROJECT SHEET NO.OF JOB NO. OCT101991 City of CABLSBAD BUILDiNGPEPT. PV J \ /^ y \ / r\ '—v /"*. <?T^ 1 < |, U., " 00* ;•*¥[?*: .1% it. BY DATE PROJECT SHEET NO.OF JOB NO. . APPROVED City of BUILDING DEPT.