Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1854 MARRON RD; BLDG M; 87-86; Permitgr- .0 'I hereby affirm that lam licensed under UI provisions of Chapter 9 (commencing with I -Section 7000) of Division 3 of the Business-I I ind Professions Code, and my license is in L. Jull force and effect. u -: •' - - I -hereby affirm-that I am exempt, from lire 'Contrac-tor's License Law for the following reason (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any city or csunty,which re-quires a, permit .10 construct alter, improve, demolish, or .t repair any structure, prior to its issuance also requires the ap- - - plicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractors License Law (Chapter 9 commencing with Section 7000 of Division 3 o the Business and Professions Code) or that is ex' empl therefrom and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031,5 by an applicant for a permit Sub' - edo the applicant lox civil penally of not more than live hun- dred dollars ($500). - I II, as owner of the property, or my employees with wages as 'heir solo compensation, will do the woilr, and the slroc- - tare is not intended or offered for sale (Soc. 7044, Business _J and Profession Code: .,The Contractor's License Law does nut apply to an owner of properly who builds or improves the, and who does such work himself or through his own - employees, provided that such improvements are not intend- lad ed or offered for sale. If. however, the building or improve- Z mont is sold within one /ear of completion, the owner-builder At - will have lire burden 01 proving that he did not build or im-. prone for lhe purpose of sale). -D I; as owner 01 the properly,, am exclusively contracting ° 'with licensed contractors 10 construct the project (Sec. 7044. - Business and Professions Cede: The Contractor's License Law does not apply loan owner 01 property who builds or im- proves thereon,- and who contracts for each projects with a contractor(s) license pursuant to lire' Contractor's License Law(. •, ,a * As a home-owner lam improvinmy home, and the follow- 1; ing conditions -exist:. ,''.,,- , f' i - 1, ..'The work is being performed prior to sale.. 2. I have lived in' my' home - ler twelve months _prior to completion of this work. ......3. , I have not claimed this exemption during the last three years. lam eeempt under Sec. ' ' ' B & P.C.' for this reason - C— .. 0, I hereby affirm that I have a certificate of consent to I ' sell-innure, or a certificate of Workers' Compensation In. I sarance, er'a certilied'copy thereof (Se c. 3000. Labor Code) - POLICY NO, COMPANY.4 C3 "Copy ishIed with lhEi'ly', 0 Certified copy is heriby furnished.'.,: - - Ui IL ..CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION FROM O - WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE 3 U (This section need not be completed if the permit is for one hundred dollars 101001 or less) lad . - cnrtily, Ihat in the performance Of the work for which this permit is issued. I shall not-employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compen. oalien Laws of California, NOTICE TO APPLICANT: If?alter making this Certibiéale - of Exemption, you should become subject to the Workers' - Compensalien provisions or the Labor Code, you mosl forthwith comply with such previsions Or this permil shall bedeemed revoked - - cc- ---- " .' ne r' 0 hereby attirrrc that ' lheris a construction .lending '.agency for Iheperformance of the work for which Ihis per- mit is issued (Sec. 3097, Civil Code) zi WI Lender's Name . ,__'._ - -. , ..,t -.--• -,-'--'•. -a - Lender's Address - - - r - I - USE BAlI. POINT PFN ONLY 1.PRFSSI1ARfl ftDDI IAIUT TA Pit I liii IIJADMATIAPJ %AIITUIIJ CIJAnCIl AOCA AIJI'% rIC(I AflATI(k1C 1-.- CARLSBADBUILDING ÔEPARTMENT - 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009-4859 (619) 438-1161 APPLICATION & PERMIT JOB ADDRESS . AV, ST. Rp( REST CROSS ST. DATE OF APPLICATION BUSINESS LICENSE # VALUATION' • PERMIT NUMBER ZONE LOT _BLOCK '.Ij SUBOI'rIS'ION ASSESSOR PA_-' - CONTRACTOR CONTRACTORS PHONE a cOC_t,2 _£leI.Z_.7 I OW!4E R'S ,NAME -. OWNER'S PHONE - • ,- - ..• - CONTRACTOR'S ADDRESS STATE LICENSE NO. * - BUILDING SO FOOTAGE L ?5171ç'c- 7,re? JUN O RSMAUNG ADDRESS 2 I3Q42C.4 DESIGNER q i'/?-5b ,Zf DESIGNER'S PHONE DESCRIPTION OF WORK DESIGNER'S ADDRESS , ' STATE LICENSE NO, - )_s _ T1TI,"2'" F/P F LR ELEV. NO ' STORIES 0CC GP .__•52 . EDU vOND FIRE SPR' PARKING SPACE. RES UNITS GRADING PERMIT ISSUED E . REDEVELOPMENT ' . TYPE - 'J 0CC LOAD AREA ' CqNr,/ vO e 0 YO NO vOND Not Valid Unless MachineCertified - OTY. - -. PLUMBING PERMIT- ISSUE - , OTY. * MECHANICAL PERMIT ISSUE , SUMMARY/00 _O2B1dPlnt _11 3. EACHFIXTURETRAP --. 77_$.- INSTALL FURN. DUCTS UPTO100,000 BTU , _— / BUILDING PERMIT O01-8)0-0O-0O-8220, - / EACH BUILDING SEWER - - S' OVER 100 ' 000 BTU - SIGN PERMIT ' . 001-810-00-00-8221 EACH WATER HEA TER AND/OR VENT , BOILER/COMPRESSOR UPTO3HP - .--. PLAN CHECK - 001-810-00-00-8821 EACH GAS SYSTEM 1TO4OUTLETS ' BOILER/COMPRESSOR 3.15HP TOTALPLUMBING 001-810-00-00-8222 - -..--. EACIl GAS SYSTEM 5'0R MORE' METALFIREPLACE -.- -ELECTRICAL 001-810-00-00-8223 - - - - EACH INSTAL.. ALTER, REPAIR WATER PIPE . VENT FAN SINGLE DUCT MECHANICAL _001-810-00-00-8224 - EACHVACUUMBREAKER' - --. .'-- / MECHEXHAUST -HOOD/DUCTS --'i--- -MOBILEHOME -0O1-810-00'0O-8225 - WATERSOFTNER __. _-.' . . - -• RELOCATIONOFEAFURNACE/HEATER _- .,-'''SOLAR'--.-'001-810-00-00-8226 - '- - EACHROOFDRAINIINSIDEI --- , , DRYERVENT _.•'.' ' STRONG MOTION _' 880-519-92'33 - . TOTAL MECHANICAL -•-' - -. _.- 3/ " FIRE SPRINKLERS .,,01-810-00-0O-8227 --' - TOTAL PLUMBING' - • - -,i/c------ -PUBLICFACILITIES FEE. OY320-810-00-00-8740" -.3 '/3_7— OTY. ELECTRICAL PERMIT: ISSUE ' - 00.' QTY- ' • MOBILE HOME SETUP, - BRIDGEFEE _.W4_360.810'00-00-8740 PARK-IN-LIEU(AREA. .- NEWCONST-EAAMPISWT'BKR ,• CAR PORT, ': _--- 134 810-00-00-8835 - - - 1PH -.. _ 3 _H _ '3 - AWNING ' -.• LA COSTA T)F 133-810'00-00-8835 EXIST BLDG EA AMP/SWT/8 , GARAGE FMF IPH _3PH '.'- . ' - --J:I;J _i ___001-810-00-00-8162 - - - --- - - REMOOEL.'ALTER PER CIRCUIT _• - ' ' _. - ___J n_•_LICENSETAX MFF 880-519-92-57 - TEMP POLE 200 AMPS - OVER200AMPS _-.--a .- -' -MPR_1_R_198 '_-_'-'-- - TEMP OCCUPANCY (30 DAYS)-- - _________ _______ CIt'_of_CARL CREDIT DEPOSIT ITOTALELELTRICAL FVEI,OQMENT PROCESSII GSERVS TOTALFEESPAYABLE_ I HAVE CAREFULLY EXAMINED THE COMPLETED "APPLICATION AND PERMIT" AND DO HEREBY Expiration.. Every permit issued by the Building Official under the provisions of this ' - * AN OSHA P8RMtT IS REQUIRED FOR EXCAVATIONS OVER CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT ALL INFORMATION HEREON INCLUDING THE Code shall expire by hrnritatrorr and become null and void If the building or work authorized by 50" DEEP AND DEMOLITION OR CONSTRUCTION or such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such DECLARATIONS ARE TRUE AND CORRECT AND I FURTHER CERTIFY AND AGREE IF A PERMIT is permit, or if the building or work authorized by such pen s suspended or STRUCTURES OVER 3 STORIES IN HEIGHT ISSUED: TO COMPLY WITH ALL CITY. COUNTY AND STATE LAWS GOVERNING BUILDING CON abandonedatany time after the work rs commenced for a period 01180days - STRUCTION, WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT, I ALSO AOREE TO SAVE INDEMNIFY AND , _________________________' AP ED BY - KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE OWNER LI CONTRACTOR LJ - - •• - , ATE EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE BY PHONE _- • GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT FIELD INSPECTION RECORD REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS INSPECTION REQ. IF CHECKED IN$P Ad SOILS COMPLIANCE PRIOR TO FOUNDATION INSP STRUCTURAL CONCRETE OVER 2000 PSI PRESTRESSED CONCRETE '.,:I?OST TENSIONED_ CJ'JCRETE FIELD WELDING HIGH STRENGTH BOLTS SPECIAL MASONRY PILES CAISSONS \ '..-. •.\ -' ':. ________ _________ \\ P --_• INSPECTORS NOTES -- :f 4. rvriyr frTiTO!_IiLI visjV ' TYPE DATE INSPECTOR BUILDING 1 FOUNDATION REINFORCED STEEL MASONRY I GUNITE OR GROUT SUB FRAME E1 FLOOR LI CEILING SHEATHING 0 ROOF 0 SJ-IEAR FRAME EXTERIOR LATH INSULATION I INTERIOR LATH & DRYWALL PLUMBING 0 SEWER AND BL/CO 0 PL/CO UNDERGROUND 0 WASTE Ei WATER TOP OUT DWASTE DJVATER TUB AND SHOWER PAN GAS TEST O WATER HEATER 0 SOLAR WATER ELECTRICAL O ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND UFER ROUGH ELECTRIC ELECTRIC SERVICE 0 TEMFORAY O BONDING 0 POOL i MECHANICAL DUCT & PLEM., 0 REF. PIFINC-- HEAT - AIR COND. SYSTEMS VENTILATING SYSTEMS CALL FOR FINAL INSPECTION WHEN ALL APPROPRIATE _______________ • ITEMS ABOVE HAVE BEEN APPROVED.- FINAL ______ ______ • • _____ PLUMBING ELECTRICAL GAS MECHANICAL BUILDING • i 7 1 • SPECIAL CONDITIONS - lq City of Carlsbad 1200 El/Ivi, CARLSBAD, CA 92008 • TEL. (619) 438-5525 /çti- ,M-4-o-' MISCELLANEOUS RECEIPT Job 1, 2R 7 Rci4d Address (' / MISCELLANEOUS FEE RECEIPT L PLAN CHECK FEE 00181000-008821 VALUATION___________________ / Owner i - jy (oe'!- fe Mailing Address Cityp I 1/ ftW _,I(Zipq 2 Tel. 75 u____________________________ Contractor I ir Address /' ____ % /ke ikcac/, City,'TeIU Zi_____ -c Slate Lic. '2 S. Classit. City Lic. No. LI____________ LEGAL DESCRIPTION CT ASSESSORS PARCEL NO./_- LI DESCRIPTION OF WORK 4boF.7Yr' El Li LI________________________ LI_______________ HL PLAN ID NO. _________Pke__ LI________________________ TOTAL FEE $ CONTACTPERSON WARNING: PLAN CHECK FEES. WHERE NO ACTION IS TAKEN BY THE APPLICANT IN 180 DAYS AND NO BUILDING PERMIT IS ISSUED. ARE FORFEITED TO THE CITY. COMMENTS:__________________________________________ AD DRESS ht'I Ctv/& _ ZIP ___i ________PHONE # //(/ LJJL Sigirature of AppIIcaiit i h4il Date 7_f_I . -X_C/'I ____ White - Applicant Yellow - File Pink - (1) Finance (2) Data Process Gold - Assessor FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION 87 -86 .. PLAN CHECK NUMBER: DATE: PROJECT NAME: . 1854 Marron Rd Bldg M . ADDRESS: PROJECT NO:: UNIT NUMBER: _________________ PHASE NO.: coin bkfç . TYPE OF UNIT: . NUMBER OF UNITS' . John Collins . •.• .. . . CONTACT PERSON: . . S. 434-1546 . CONTACT TELEPHONE: . all dept .• INSPECTED DATE . .. . . BY: INSPECTED: ___________ APPROVED ______ DISAPPROVED S INSPECTED DATE S S BY: S INSPECTED: S APPROVED ______ DISAPPROVED INSPECTED DATE S S BY: S S INSPECTED: ___________ APPROVED ______ DISAPPROVED COMMENTS: Rev. 1/86 WHITE: Suspense BLUE: Water District GREEN: Engineering CANARY: Utilities PINK: Planning GOLD: Fire FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION 87 -86 3-2-88 PLAN CHECK NUMBER: . DATE: PROJECT.NAME: 1854 Marron Rd Bldg M . ... ADDRESS: . . . . PROJECT NO . UNIT NUMBER PHASE NO comm bldg TYPE OF UNIT: NUMBER OF UNITS:' . . - •-'-. John Collins Its CONTACT PERSON: . '. . k, 434-1546 CONTACT TELEPHONE:... all dept I LV V\ - . ..., - DATE BY: INSPECTED f\A_"INSPECTED: APPROVED DISAPPROVED INSPECTED DATE BY: - INSPECTED: APPROVED .. DISAPPROVED INSPECTED DATE I VBY. - . INSPECTED: V . APPROVED DISAPPROVED V •. -, V V V : ,., VI Costa Real Municipal Water District 1 ; COMMENTS: Engineering DeDàrtment- (619) 438-3367- V V V V• • . ,V V :- . . . V. - •V V - V V . V • V V . -V V 4 V. S V ...s!., . . V• .4 # V V..! . •' •-- - _4• ¼ ................... V 4 V V •VVVV V!VV / V V V V V •• V - •• . _: V V V.V V 4 V .. V - V V VV ., :.. V VV V • :. . • . V, VV: Rev 1186 WHITE Suspense BLUE Water District GREEN Engineering CANARY Utilities PINK Planning GOLD V Fire V - V •• V V FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION 87 -86 . 3-2-88 PLAN.CHECK NUMBER: DATE: . .. PROJECT NAME: 18514 Marron Rd 111dq M ADDRESS: PROJECT NO.: UNIT NUMBER: PHASE comm TYPE OF UNIT: . NUMBER OF UNITS: MAR rj John Collins UT1L111Es S . CONTACT PERSON: . 3$-1546 .. . DEPA ME CONTACT TELEPHONE: all dept .. INSPECTED DATE INSPECTED: APPROVED DISAPPRÔVED INSPECTED DATE BY: INSPECTED: ___________ APPROVED ______ DISAPPROVED INSPECTED DATE . S BY: ______________________ INSPECTED: ___________ APPROVED ______ DISAPPROVED COMMENTS: . . S SS :s , Rev. 1186 WHITE: Suspense BLUE: Water District GREEN: Engineering CANARY: Utilities PINK: Planning GOLD: Fire -S FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION & 87 —86 3-2-88. PLAN CHECK NUMBER: DATE: PROJECT NAME: 18514 Marron Rd'Idg. M ADDRESS: PROJECT NO.: UNIT NUMBER: __________________ PHASE NO.: • comm bldg TYPE OF UNIT: . NUMBER OF UNITS: • John Collins CONTACTPERSON:________________________________________________________________________ 434-15146 . CONTACT TELEPHONE:________________________________________________________________________ .. . aildept PEC PE INS E ER DATE APPROVED DISAPPROVED INSPE TED DATE BY: INSPECTED: APPROVED DISAPPROVED INSPECTED •... . . DATE BY: INSPECTED APPROVED DISAPPROVED 5- : . COMMENTS: 00 : Rev. I86 WHITE: Suspense BLUE: Water District GREEN: Engineering CANARY: Utilities PINK: Planning GOLD: Fire FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION RECEIVED 03, 8 7 -SG 3-2-08 PLAN CHECK NUMBER: DATE: PROJECT NAME: 1854 M3rron Rd Bldg M ADDRESS: PROJECT NO.: _________ UNIT NUMBER: PHASE NO.: cmbkg TYPE OF UNIT: NUMBER OFUNITS: John Collins CONTACT PERSON: 34-1546 . . CONTACT TELEPHONE: • all dept BY: INSPECTED 64 ATE J4I .,I NSPECTED:I/ft7 APPROVED _____ DISAPPROVED L INSPECTED . DATE BY: INSPECTED: . APPROVED ______ DISAPPROVED INSPECTED ' 'DATE ' BY: INSPECTED: APPROVED ______ DISAPPROVED COMMENTS if I Rev. 1/86 WHITE: Suspense BLUE: Water District GREEN:, Engineering CANARY: Utilities PINK: Planning GOLD: Fire - INSULATION CERTIFICATION 1 This is to certify that insulation has been installed in conformance with the current energy regulation, California Administrative Code, Title 25, State of California, in the building located at: SITE ADDRESS 1854 Marron Road, Carlsbad, Bldg. M-North County Plaza CEILINGS Batts: Type FiberglassManUfaCturer Owens/Corning Thickness 61" R-Value 19 Blown: Type Manufacturer Thickness R-Value EXTERIOR WALLS Type Fiberglass Manufacturer Owens/Corning Thickness 6t? R-Value 19 FLOORS Type Manufacturer Thickness R-Value -. General Contractor Collins General Contractors License # Title Date Schmid Insulation Contractors, Inc. License # 221517 C-2 By A AM Title Vice President Date CAP LoLo Oct j ~lsl LP%I IL T41'; (uOtwo r1 L S0, go* iz W es s Ti i., Coo op T I C po "C To Itz OL imop a Tail a zoemo Tic 14 afTkE lb PLANNING AND 1565 HOTEL CIRCLE SOUTH MEMBERS ARCHITECTURE SAN DIEGO, CA 92108 AMERICAN INSTITUTE SAN DIEGO PO BOX 33326 (92103) OF ARCHITECTS SAN FRANCISCO (619) 297-0131 RIDGE OR UPPER END OF RINISS TILE TIF- RUN 0-010 SINGLE-LINE BOARD (RINESS TILE-TIE) DETAILS TIE-OFF W. .yflS 1 Sb i 5 S.. 'Li.Lis - ui: na I 1173 41, RINESS TILE.\\ .. - TIE' ANCHORS Not I IN TILE \ FIRS1s 'r1 \ WIRE \- STAPLE OR OR TILE \ RINESS' COPPER PAN TILE - TILE- NI )QiJ Pd TILE - COVER TILES (AVE DETAIL CEMENT WITH WIND-LOCK - WIND-LOCA is COPA1I111.1 WITH ALL FORMS OF TYLF.V LOOP \ PEx* I— WOOF TILE FASTENING METHODS V. THE RINESS TILETIETM METHOD I The Riness Tile-Tie System (also known as Single Line Tile-Tie) is a labor saving device for tile attachment and a lOw cost alternative to the Twisted Wire Tyle-Tye' System. Riness Tile-Tie- is U.B.C. approved for slopes of 2:1210 12:12 and c fl used with most clay Mission or clay Shingle Tiles. Use of the ties as directed results in a non- penetrated membrane and locks together the rows of tile to prevent wind damage, earth- quake damage or shifting of tile from other causes. The system consists of interconnecting a series of preformed wire ties through the holes of the tile to provide a continuous an- chorage against sliding off. Besides being anchored at the ridge and eave line the wire ties are anchored at intermediate points as required to avoid overstressing the individual fasteners. Use the wood deck anchor from the Twisted Wire System or the special 9 gauge Riness Anchor if the deck can be nailed. All anchors are given a coat of rooters mastic to seat the underlayment. For added strength and in wind areas use the appropri- ate size Wind Lock for all cover tiles or at least the first three courses at the eave. WIND LOCKS Also known as "Tile Locks." Wind Locks are for use with clay roofing tiles to all slopes. They provide a locking device for the butt edge of each cover tile. Wind Locks achieve gieater holding power and are used in high wind designated areas. Wind Locks are compatible with all methods of tile attach- ment and are U.B.C. approved for all slopes. MASS TO DA (102) COPPER TO GA (IC?) GALVANIZED STEEL 12 GA (5) - STAINLESS STEEL (004) WIND LOCK ATOW1AUY TOGA 8P1AS50R126A GALV STEEL FOR CLAY MISSION & 5111 CONTROLS WIND tOGA sc r oo EXPOSURE A HEAD LAP WIND LOCKS Aft COMPATIBLE WITH ALL METHODS Or.TILE OdSIAtLAIkIRI ALP NAILS SINGLE LINE TWISTED WIRE HURRICANE CLIPS Also known as Storm Locks. The Hurricane Clip is a strap-type locking device for the side edge of several types of roofing tile. It provides maximum holding power when used in conjunction with Wind Locks and one of the other Tyle-Tye Systems. Hurricane Clips are especially suited for concrete roof tiles. Advantages of the Hurricane Clips include excellent holding power and invisibility of the part after installation. Hurrican Clips are U.B.C. approved for all slopes. HURRICANE CUP Fat Ccncs& The &V CIiI S at iliinIeIile (AIso laft 2) CONCRETE TILE Fits lt idt jVltC* W4 (2) nails To bailen W Vea1tn Uso Ii HwlacamCilp 1W HURRICANE CUP 0ss.1801 x N• a4jtdteI.T90a K COLLINS -r GENERAL CONTRACTORS 11750 SORRENTO VALLEY RD. SUITE 209 SAN DIEGO CA 92121-1085 (619) 276-3380 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL TO: CITY. OF CARLSBAD . DATE: January_J31988 ADDRESS: _2075_ Las Palmas -_REF North County Plaza Building M CITY: Carl sb, CA 92008 1854 Marron Road - Carlsbad, CA ATTN: uiiiugDpt .JOB #:_87-118 WEJRANSMIT:- .. -JHE FOLLOWING:. . FOR YOUR: [A HEREWITH D CONTRACT PLANS/SPECS E APPROVAL LI UNDER SEPARATE COVER LI SAMPLES LI SELECTION LI VIA PARCEL POST . LI SHOP DRAWINGS . . INFORMATION & FILES LI BY PERSONAL DELIVERY LI . SUBMITTAL BROCHURES El USE LI . LI PAYMENT APPLICATION 'PROPOSAL LI E PROPOSAL REOUEST# - LI ACTION LI FIELD ORDER # - - Certificate of Conformance REMARKS We' are forwarding herewith one (1) of the WESTERN INSPECTION SERVICE CERTIFICATE OF CONFORMATION #777 dated-7/31/8.7 and the ICBO Evaluation Re ort above - , d August, 1984 for your information an files Zlcedec t: - . . VERY TRULY YOURS, Shirley Af Project Coordinator CC: H. Felter, SGPA/l B. McConnell, Hughes/! Field/i Transmittals/1 WESTERN. INSPECTION QUALITY SERVICE S LICENSEE veil ei"de / lecnl""W AON WESTERN INSPECTION SERVICE hereby certifies that y 8, j LmI-- Company atitsplantin. Myrtle Creek, Oregon is licensed by WESTERN INSPECTION SERVICE to use its registered trademark in respect to products which comply with Standard ANSI/AITC 190.1-1983, for Structural Glued Laminated Timbers, that the adequacy of the quality control system in effect at said plant is periodically inspected and 'verified by a WESTERN INSPECTION SERVICE INSPECTOR. In the judgment of the undersigned, said company is capable of complying with the manu- facturing and testing provisions of Standard ANSI/AITC 190.1-1983 in respect to products manufactured at said plant. The sole responsibility of the manufacturer is conformance with the Standard ANSI/AITC 190.1-1983 rn respect of any specific or particular product. WESTERN INSPECTION SERVICE's only responsibility being that the said company is qualified to produce a product meeting the said Standard and that its plant is periodically inspected and verified by WESTERN INSPECTION SERVICE. W.I.S. Certificate #_________________ Signed for WESTERN NCflON-,S.ERVICF rT MISISi I #51 THE UNDERSIGNED MANUFACTURER HEREBY CERTIFIES that the products identified below and on the following sheets are marked With the registered trademark of WESTERN INSPECTION SERVICE and were manufactured in conformance with appropriate provisions of Standard ANSI/AITC 190.1-1983 for Structural Glued Laminated Timber, and has been manufactured at our plant in Myrtle creek, Oregon , which plant has a quality control system approved by the Bureau. The undersigned manufacturer further certifies that the work has been done in accordance with UNIFORM BUILDING CODE CHAPTER 25 and the appropriate job specifications. r ' ..A.) JOB NAME Building M North County Plaza .I" I 13 JOB LOCATION 185/+ Marron Road Carlsbad, California Customer's Order No. 3731 Date ?/31/8 Mfr's Order No. 202 Doug. Fir., 240OF/V4/V8, Industrial Grade,Exterior Glue1End Seal,Load Wrar SIGNATURE COMPANY Y'& J Laminators, - TITLE Asst. Manager ' 'ADDRESS 9160 S. Myrtle Rrqd DATE 7/311 International Conference of Building Officials EVALUATION REPORT Filing Category: QUALITY CONTROL AGENCIES QUALITY CONTROL AGENCY FOR LUMBER AND GLUED. LAMINATED LUMBER AND INSPECTION AGENCY FOR PREFABRICATED TRUSS CONSTRUCTION. WESTERN INSPECTION SERVICE POST OFFICE BOX 562 COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA 92627 Subject: Quality Control Agency for Lumber and Glued-laminated Lumber and Inspection Agency for Prefabricated Truss Construction. Description: Quality Control Services: The Western Inspection Service provides quality control services in accordance with U.S.C. Stan-dards Not: 25-1, 25-3. 254 and 25-7 for lumber grading and U.B.C. Standards Nos. 25-10 and 25-I1 for glued-laminated lumber. Replicas of stamps for labels affixed to inspected products are similar to those shown inthis report. - - - Report No. AA-583 August, 1984 Inspection Services: The Western Inspection Service provides inspec- tion and certification in accordance with U.B.C. Standard No. .25-17 for prefabricated truss construction and Standard No. 25-3 for laminated testing. M.-Evidence Submitted: Outline of quality control and. inspection procedures, replicas of stamps and labels, summary of education and experience of key personnel and copies of inspection and certification forms have been submitted Findings IV. Findings: That the Western Inspection Service be recognized as a quality control and Inspection agency for the services listed In this report. This report Is subject to re-examination In two years. R1TETRUSS CO. CERTIFIED k- INSPECTION ®HCBOAA-:583 IN STRICT ACCORDANCE -. WITHUC.25-17 P:REFABRICP TED U SIRIGI ACCORDANCE I WITH UBC 25-3 CERTIFIED VJ- STANDARD ®J• S-CRN D-F QUALITY INSPECTED W-GL 10. CERTIFIED INSPECTION wi ICBO AA- 583 IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH UBC 25-10 25- 11 ICBO evaluation reports are issued solely to provide information to Class A members of the organization utilizing the code upon which 1he report is . I based. Evaluationrepores are not to be construed as representing aesthetics or any other attributes not specifically addressed nor as an endorsement or - I recommendation for use of the subject report. I This report is based upon information concerning organization and procedures submitted by the applicant. The ICRO technical staff has reviewed the I material, but does not, as a matter of routine, make an independent verification. There is no warranty by ICilO, expressed or implied, as to any - L "Finding" or other matter in the report or as to any product covered by the report. This disclaimer includes, but is not limited to, merchantability. - . . . . Page loti. ICBO Evaluation Service, Inc. A subsidiary corporation oithe International Conference of Building Officials EVALUATION REPORT Report No. AA-583 1986 Filing Category: QUALITY CONTROL AGENCIES QUALITY CONTROL AGENCY FOR LUMBER AND GLUED- LAMINATED LUMBER AND INSPECTION AGENCY FOR PREFABRICATED TRUSS CONSTRUCTION WESTERN INSPECTION SERVICE POST OFFICE BOX 562 COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, 92627 Subject: Quality Control Agency for Lumber and Glued-laminated Lumber and Inspection Agency for Prefabricated Truss Construction. Description: Quality Control Services: The Western Inspection Service provides quality control services in accordance with U.B.C. Stan- dards Nos. 25-1, 25-3, 25-4 and 25-7 for lumber grading and U.B.C. Standards Nos. 25-10 and 25-I1 for glued-laminated lumber. Replicas of stamps for labels affixed to inspected products are similar to - those shown in this report. Inspection Services: The Western Inspection Service proylles inspec- tion and certification in accordance with U.B.C. Standard No. 25-17 for prefabricated truss construction and Standard No. 25-3 for laminated testing. Evidence Submitted: Outline of quality control and inspection procedures, replicas of stamps and labels, summary of edu cation and experience of key personnel and copies of inspection and certification forms have been submitted. Findings Findings: That the Western Inspection Service be retftgnized as a quality control and inspection agency for the services IIted in this report. This report is subject to re-examination in two years. R1TETRUSS. Co. CERTIFIED INSPECTION \j\ ICBO EVALUATION ® SERVICE, INC. AA-583 IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH UBC 25-17 "PR EFABRCATED IN STRICT -ACCORDANCE WITH UBC STANDARD NO. 25-3 CERTIFIED \J- STANDARD ® S-CRN D-F QUALITY INSPECTED W-GL 10 CERTIFIED INSPECTION W ICBO EVALUATION SERVICE, INC. AA-583 IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH UBC STANDARD NO. 25-10 1 25-11 Evaluation reports of ICBO Evaluation Service, Inc., are issued solely to provide information to Class A members of ICBO, utilizing the c,!e upon which the report is based. Evaluation reports are not to be'construed as representing aesthetics or any other attributes not specifically addres.r/ nor as an endorsement or recommendation for use of the subject report. This report is based upon information concerning organization and procedures submitted by the applicant. The ICBO Evaluation Servi e Inc., technical staff has reviewed the material submitted, but does not, as matter of routine, make an independent verification. There is mm wuranty by ICBO, express or implied, as to any "Findiizg" or other matter in the report or as to any product covered by the report. This disclaimer incluJ.ç but is not limited to, merchantability. - qe1of1 TO I, ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES Consulting Soil, Foundation & Geological Engineers 10505 ROSELLE STREET SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92121 (619) 453-5605 DATE 1 91/7 I JOB NO. c2 ?9— £ PROJECT /Lb/2Th/ L4 LOCATION 4- CONT CTOR I OWNER WEATHER . TEMP. ° at A.M. ° at P.M. PRESENT AT SITE THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTED: I have inspected the materials exposed in the footing excavations for the > subject building.). The materials consist essentially of 4&ia4 c ,47Ac (scj as anticipated in our __ investigation report. Accordingly, it is our opinion that the footing excavations have been carried to the proper depth and that the materials exposed are suitable for the support of footings designed in accordance with the recommendations presented in the &)74-#A/!5c. investigation report for the project dated 40f2. lie "44—. 2/i9/p,r Our services consist of professional opinions and recommendations made in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and > . practices. This warranty is in lieu of all other warranties either express or implied. ID / COPIES TO ]I1CI1JI I©Th1I SIGNED 2, )J2j JWITCH1oARD1M5er1 00A.1120/WeVO4w U/C, PULL 11E1P. 'EcT. METe-R. QT. ME1EJ (CTIOt.J J'2'2"M1 1 L 5FAct 1 HP P4C T -(000'A 1w1weu-j I • 4', 4W P,U Q I I )40A sr _ Ifl Irnif W •W auy - I A Ti'f 10 TT SINQLe t'JO 'SCALE I I LIrJeLIIFJe.LI 1PAJeL fJJ6L 'PAEL1p4eL1 L1JL_JL_i LJL(J V1 TYf & JEtS 4.ccwc)uGTGRb OF 5 FU.UI'HD UIJOe T4IJT I!1P 4VEMJT COW TAcT5 _LIkI.. DIAC-iRAM NORTH COUNTY PLAZA BUILDING M CARLSBAD. CALJORNi OWNER PfJCHES NORTH COUNTY ASSOCTES sWITGHPcAW FOR. Fcoo 5tikVict TE'JA.JTS HeET1cF1 EXISTING UNDERGROUND PRIMARY SERVICE DUCT. EXISTING PAD MOUNT SERVICE TRANSFORMER & CONCRETE PAD, EXISTING 2-4 CO. STUBBED-OUT FOR SECONDARY SERVICE DUCT. INTERCEPT EXISTING 2-4 CO. PVC BELOW GRADE (VERIFY LOCATION) AND EXTEND TO NEW "M585". (j UNDERGROUND PULL SECTION PER SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC REQUIREMENTS. 600A., 3-POLE MAIN CIRCUIT.BREAKER SHALL BE U/L LISTED AND RATED FOR 42,000 AMP. INTERRUPTING CAPACITY SYM..IIIN. BUS SHALL BE RATED FOR 42,bOOA., FAULT CURRENT WITHSTAND. CD PROVIDE UFER" TYPE GROUNDING ELECTRODE IN ACCORDANCE WITH NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE 1984, SECTION 250-81(C). PROVIDE APPROVED FOR USE GROUND CLAMP AT NEAREST ACCESSIBLE METALLIC COLD WATER PIPE. CD FUSES SHALL BE DUAL ELEMENT, CURRENT LII1ITIN&BUSSIIAN TYPE LPN-RK". ii PROVIDE 120/208 V1 3 PHASE, 4-WIRE METER SOCKET PER SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC REQUIREMENTS. •. FEEDER CONDUIT SHALL'BE STUBBED INTO TENANT SPACE 3-0' F-fiN. BEYOND FUTURE DEMISING WALLS & ABOVE FUTURE CEILINGS. • S NORTH COUNTY PLAZA BUILDING M. CARLS8AA CALFORt1A ONER W J COiJiT'y ASSOCIATES IL--S1 _ 3'•. MTC'H OARO &HAES FOOD seply1cle TENAiT, e*1eT 2°r4 I • tLL±J / T 7 2 ff: - — J — .- -- 1= t— i—• ,- t-. tu o z ' u. t7 0 Ui - D tag i-F-I--i-,--- I- 1,: I ui iLl ui U) U) o LAO - - — — — - - LAJ U. x ,-.1• Ui - o Lai Ui - - — - - — — — QJ (0 .— : i3 ci ) f3 dl ; 0 2 > ;1 L! Q I ,. 2d42Z72 IL IL u LLA W6 73 7:3 44 &I4. US Do a — 2 i— 0 go W6 A ogo tp 16 CA 2 8 (, f .. y'4C.O, 70. IJEAFE5t '. . Acc61LE F1E.JtLLI& CQLDVATEP.f1,, • •,• I - . •. d Vxe"x3/4t' f\tv'WP . Hn1\ J4 ME1E • • 1 - Ot[P. SEC.f c -_ 4 • M4I.J WITCH04PD ---- - I J • . • 600A . 0 J • .....•. • .. • 10 I1o/'ZOE3i,,'IW • q'Nl • . 7 1 1-,Hfl1-\ • LJ/q 105 •. HOUSE. rJJL "Hpt1 ELE&TIICL -QUIPMEWT GLOSE NO We • .. • . eview rZc1&7) F NORTH COUNTY PLAZA • G M .• - 000 e€ica ALFORNIA ,- I 3ES NORTH COUNTY ASSOCIATES • i r- . Z P c' i . . tIEE14OFl ESGIL CORPORATION, 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619)560-1468 DATE: i4_j '7 []APPLICANT..,. JURISDICTION: C PcL.', AD [IFILE COPY PLAN CHECK NO: DuPs E]DESIGNER PROJECT ADDRESS: 165 A RICO J PROJECT NAME:iJi1+ (U,uT PL.AZft Lc::'. fri The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. fl The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficien- cies identified are resolved and checked by building.department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies Lj identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. U The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corp. until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to return to the applicant contact person. • 9The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Eli Esgil staff did not advise the applicant contact person that plan check has been completed. Esgil staff did advise applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted:tv\WZ-a .J2-PcL- • • Date contacted: (io/7 Telephone # -Z- OII • REMARKS- By: MAKJVE~L. A)N'ZA— Enclosures:_________________ ESGIL CORPORATION ESGIL CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR.. SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) 560• 1468 DATE: 3-2D - JURISDICTI JURISDICTION: flPLAN []FILE COPY PLAN CHECK NO: S(2 .L. DUPS PROJECT ADDRESS: )4 0 DESIGNER PROJECT NAME J%rk- cUt' fL-_P.r tA The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially'comply with the jurisdiction's biilding codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply D with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficien- cies identified - are resolved and checked.by building department staff. The plans, transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies D identified on the enclosed checklist and should be corrected. and resubmitted for a complete recheck. POL The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The p:lans are being held at Esgil Corp. until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check. list Is enclosed for the jurisdiction to return to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: CA .D Esgil staff did not advise the applicant contact person that plan check has been completed. Esgil staff did advise applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted: __________ Telephone #.11./17QI3j 0 REMARKS: By: y'p)UL 612-Pr . Enclosures: ESGIL CORPORATION . -. . . .. PLAN CE= NO.. &7 -, JURISDICTION: -A'L' ahe TO: '. cj r j2-toô PROJECT DATA OCCUPANCY: -' BUILDING USE: TPrvt_.. .TYPE OF NSTRIJcflON:______________________ ACTUAL AREA: _ ALLABLE AREA:___________________ STOR]: EEI: SPRTh: OCCUPANT LOAD: REMARKS: PLAN CORRECTION SH GENERAL.COMMERCIAL FORERD: PLEASE READ Plan check is limited to technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the handicapped. The plan check Is based on regulations enforced by the Building Inspection Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. Present California law mandates that construction comply with Title 24 and the applicable model code editions adopted, with or without changes, by the various state agencies authorized, to propose building regulations for enforcement at the local-level. Code sections cited are based on the 1982 UBC. The above regulations apply to construction, regardless of the code editions adopted by ordinance at the local level. The circled items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items have to be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 303 (c), 1982 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, specification. etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. Date plans received by jurisdiction: Date plans received by Esgil Corp.:2_137 Date initial plan check completed: By: Applicant contact person: 4)V27/ O(JP- Tel. . . NOTE:' PAGE NUMBRES ARE NOT IN SJICE AS PAGES HAVING NO ITEMS NEEDING a)RRiON WERE DRLRTP1I. - List No. 30, GENERAL COMMERCIAL, WITHOUT ENERGY OR LOCAL ORDINANCE OR POLICY SUPPLEMENTS 1 4/23/86 A. PLANS Zings Please make all corrections on the original and submit two new sets of prints, and any original plan, sets that may have been returned' to you by the jurisdiction, to: Esgil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite #208, San Diego, California 92123, (619) 560-1468. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints, and any original plan sets that may have been returned to you by the jurisdiction, to: The jurisdiction's building department. Provide the site address and a vicinity sketch on the Title Sheet. Provide the names, addresses and telephone numbers of the owner and the responsible design professionals on the Title Sheet. sheets of the plans and the first sheet of the calculations are required to be signed by the California licensed architect or engineer 'responsible for the design. Please include the California license number and ,the date the plans are signed., fi Indicate on the Title Sheet whether or not a grading permit is required for this project. Show on the Title Sheet all buildings, structures, walls, etc. included under this application. Any portion of the project shown on the site plan that is not includedwith the building permit application filed should be clearly identified as "not included" on the site plan or Title Sheet. Provide 'a Building Code Data Legend on the Title Sheet. Include the following code information for each' building proposed: Occupancy Group %-Descriptionon of Use Type of Construction Sprinklers: Yes or No —a Stories - Height —.,Floor Area area -abe5-C. 3rfaôrrtecr ailá'51T stres.-in-ah1&.D. C. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow, property lines, easements, streets, existing and proposed buildings and structures, location of yards used for allowable increase of building area and dimensioned setbacks. Provide a statement on the site plan stating: "All property lines, easements and buildings, both existing and proposed, are shown on this site plan". 1_t kPc A2, t) lb oUP1t.) L)1)7)L' 7JAJr )mnii f.iri5 kJE *-\) ui-rr-O 1O IL I. INTERIOR WALL AND CEILING FINISH J. OCCUPANCY SEPARAION Foam plastics shl1. not be used as interior e84. A -hour occupancy separation is finish except as provided in Section 1712. required between occupancy and the occupancy. Table 5-B, When walls and ceiling are required to be Section 503 (d), Tables 43-A, B, C and fire-resistive or noncombustible, the finish Chapter 43. material shall be applied directly against the fire-resistive construction or to furring strips ,,85. Administrative and clerical offices and not exceeding 1-3/4 inches. The' furred space similar rooms need not be separated from other shall be filled with inorganic or Class I occupancies provided they are less than 750 sq material or fire stopped not to exceed 8 feet ft., less than 25 percent of the floor area of in any direction Section 4203,.l. the major use and not related to an H-]. or H-2 Occupancy. Section 503 (d). When finish materials are set out or dropped more than 1-3/4 inches from'f ire-rated walls or Provide -hour fire-resistive door ceilings the finish material shall be Class I or assemblies in the. -hour occupancy sprinklered on both sides or attached to separation. Section 503 (c). noncombustible backing or furring strips. Section 4203, 2. The required three-hour rated occupancy separation between B-]. and R-1 occupancies may [. Hangers and 'assembly members of dropped be reduced to a two-hour rating when the B-]. is ceilings below a one-hour ceiling assembly shall limited to the storage of passenger vehicles, be noncombustible materials except in Types III and the provisions of Section 702 are not and V. construction, where fire-retardant treated ' , applicable. Table 5-B. The two-hour occupancy wood may be used. Section 4203, 2. ,' separation may be further. reduced,, to one-hour, if the aggregate area of B-1 occupancy within All interior wall or ceiling finishes less the building does not exceed 3,000 sq. 'ft. than. 1/4 inch thick shall be applied directly Section 503 (d). against a noncombustible 'backing unless it is in 'accordance with an approved tested assembly. A B-1 occupancy in the basement or first Section 4203, 4. ' ' ' story of a building housing a group B, Division 83 Provide a note on the plans or on the finish 2 occupancy may be classed as a separate building. The building above may also be schedule, "Wall and ceiling' materials shall not considered a separate and distinct building for exceed the flame spread classifications in UBC the purpose of area limitation, limitation of Table .42-B." ' . . number of stories and type of construction ONLY if the following Section 702 conditions are met: B-i is Type I construction. Openings in a three-hour fire-resistive - separation shall be protected by a 'three-hour B-1/B-2-is separated by a three-hour assembly, and openings may not exceed 25 percent occupancy separation.' of the length of wall in the story and no single opening shall exceed 120 sq. ft. C. B-i is restricted to passenger vehicle Section-503 (d), Tables 43-A, B, C and storage,-laundry rooms and mechanical Chapter 43.. , equipment rooms (no storage, recreation room, etc.). , " ' S. A two-hour fire-resistive separation shall be not less than two-hour fire-resistive d. The maximum building height does not' construction. Openings shall be protected by a exceed the limits in Table 5-D for the one and one-half-hour assembly. Section 503 least type of construction. (c), Tables 43-A, B, C'and Chapter 43. The Type I construction is required' to have one-hour fire-resistive separation shall protected exterior wall openings when located ' ' be not less than one-hour fire-resistive within 20 feet from a property line. ' ' construction. Openings shall be protected by a Section 1803(b). ' one-hour assembly. Section 503 (c), Tables 43- A, B, C and Chater 43. In Type I construction, no openings are permitted in exterior wails less than ,5 feet y1.. Occupancy separation wall penetrations must from'a property line. Section 1803 (b). . ' be either ferrous or copper and-fire-stopped. Steel electrical outlet boxes, not exceeding 16 p1. All openings in floors forming a three-hour square inches per 100 square feet of wall, may searation shall be protected by vertical be installed and shall be separated by a enclosures above and below the opening., The ' . horizontal distance of 24 inches when on walls of such enclosures shall be not less than opposite sides of,'a'walr.- 'Section 4304..(.e). two-hour,, fire-resistive construction, and - openings therein shall be protected by a one and ...9X.-'Fire-resistive floors used for occupancy one-half-hour-assembly. Section. 503 (c), , separation shall have openings for mechanical Tables 43-A,, B, C and Chapter 43. . and electrical equipment enclosed in shafts per Section 1706. ' . Structural members supporting an occupancy separation must have the same fire-resistive , )4. Clarify that wiring within concealed spaces rating as the separation. Table 5-B, Section complies with Section 4305 (e). 503 (d),, Tables 43-A, B, C and Chapter 43. Ducts penetrating. one or two-hour occupancy No openings are allowed in a four-hour separation walls must have fire dampers. A fire fire-resistive occupancy separation' wall. ' door is required for three-hour separations. 'Section 503 (c). . . Section 4306 (j). ' 'Glazing in shower and tub- enclosures shall be tempered, laminated-or approved plastic (including windows within 5 feet of tub or shower floor). Section 5406 (d) 5. P. ROOF S )8I(A fire-retardant roof covering is required. See exceptions under Section 3202 (b). 5.- Specify roof pitch. - ],61'Roof pitch is not adequate for-roof covering - specified. Specify minimum pitch of - h1'Specify roof material and application. l ' Specify ICBO, UL or other recognized listing approval number for roof materials not covered in UBC. 69. Specify roof slope for drainage or design to support accumulated water. Section 3207 (a). ]e?6Shów roof drains and overflows. Size drains per Appendix D of UPC. Section 3207 (a). ]1'Show the legal basis to allow roof drainage to flow onto the adjacent property. - 'raft stop roof/ceiling area, attics, g172 ards, overhangs, false fronts and, similar to - limit area to 3,000 sqr ft. or 60 LF (9,000 sq. ft. and 100 LF, if sprinklerèd). Section 2516 (f). - - and B-4 occupancies with over 50,000 sq. ft. of undivided area-and H occupancies over 15,000 sq. ft. :° single floor area shall have smoke and heat vents per Section 3206. Provide skylight details to show compliance with Section 3401 and 5207 orprovide ICBO or other recognized approval listing. - - - 15 4/23/86 Provide plastic roof panel details to show - compliance with Section 5206 or provide ICBO or other recognized approval listing. - Show attic ventilation. Minimum-vent area is 1/150 of attic area or 1/300-of attic area if at least. 50 percent of the required vent is at least 3 feet-above eave or cornice vents. - - - Section 3205 (c).. Provide a minimum 22" x 30" '(or 30" x 30" if equipment is in attic) attic.access-openiñg. Section 3205 (c). - - Q. FIRE n.*JIsaui - - Fire sprinklers are required for any story or basement when the floor area exceeds '1,500 sq. ft.and there is not provided at least 20 sq ft. of- opening entirely above the adjoining ground - - in each '50 lineal feet or fraction thereof of , exterior wall on at least one side, or when openings are provided on only one side and the. opposite side is more than 75 feet away. - Section 3802 (b). 17 Fire sprinklers are required in a basement if any portion of 'a basement is more than 75 feet 'from openings in an exterior wall. Section'3802 (b). - - sprinklers- are -required at the top of - rubbish and linen chutes and in their terminal rooms. -Chutes extending-through three or more - floors shall have additional sprinkler heads installed within such chutes at alternate floors. Sprinkler heads shall be accessible for - servicing. Section1802 (b). -- - .ZCFire sprinklers are required in retail sales rooms where the floor area exceeds 12,000 sq. - ft. on any floor or 24,000 sq.- ft. on all floors. Section 3802.- Provide fire sprinklers Section 506, 507, 508 or 3802. See'also jurisdiction ordinance. When serving more than 100 sprinkler heads, automatic sprinkler systems shall be supervised by an approved central, proprietary or remote, station service, or shall be provided ,with a local alarm which will give an audible signal at a constantly attended location. Provide class standpipes per Section 3807. A first story as allowed by Section 702 shall be included in determining the number of stories when determining if standpipes are required. Section 3806. R. FOUNDATION CID Provide a copy of the project soil 'report prepared by a California licensed architect or civil engineer. The report shall include. foundation design recommendations based on, the engineer's findings and shall comply with IJBC' Section 2905. 1H rp..-rto W?'5 G) Specify on the foundation plan or structural specifications sheet the soil classification, the soils expansion index and the design bearing capacity of the foundation. The foundation plan, does not comply with the following soil report recommendation(s) for this project eIr-Provide notes on the foundation plan listing the soils report recommendations. for foundation slab and building pad preparation. 5190. Note on the foundation plan that: "Prior to I contractor requesting a Building Department foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the Building Official in writing that: the building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report: the utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and; C. the foundation excavations, forming and reinforcement comply with .the soils report and approved plan". I Mae Provide spread footings for concentrated loads designed.for 1,000 psf soil bearing or'per ' ....- bearing value as determined by an engineer or architect. Chapter 29. 9how height of all foundation walls. Chapter 23. 18 . Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soil report are properly incorporated into the plans.. (When required, by the soil report). . ......... Show height of-retained earth on all foundation walls. Chapter 23. 11( Show distance from foundation, to edge of cut or fill slopes and show slope and heights of cuts and fills. Chapter 29. )Note on the plans that wood shall be 6 inches above finish grade Section 2516 (c) 7 "NDO I r o Tn )flç 0t7,( 5j 1I Fe 7OTT,.)/, otU ~'2 t¼J lH P1644i. IIZAs 16 4/23/86 (9. Note-on plans that surface water will drain away from building and show drainage pattern and key elevations. Section 2905 (f). Dimension foundations per Table 29-A. I NuNBEROF 'I I Ft.00RS SUPPORTED I BY THE THICKNESS OF I FOUNDATION WAU. I (IwiNWI I I wiom OF I P001540 I ITWiW I I THICKNESS I I OP FOOTING I (W-t-0 PTh BELOW I UNDISTURBED I I GROUND SURFACE I UNIT I FOUNDATION CONCRETE MASONRY I I IInINuI I I . I 6 .1 6 I 12 6 12 2 I 8 IS 7 I3 j o [ 10 IS 8 1.24 I Show foundation sills to be pressure treated, or equal. Section 2516.(c) 3. (Z)how foundation bolt size and spacing. Section 2907(e). Specify size, ICBO number and manufacturer of power driven pins. Show edge and end distance and spacing. Section 306 (f). Show size, embedent and location of hold down anchors' on foundation plan. Section 2303 (b).4. 202. ote on the plans that hold down anchors must e tied in place prior to foundation inspection. Show adequate footings under all bearing walls and shear walls. Section 2907 (d). Show stepped footings for slopes steeper than 1:10. Section 2907 (c). Show minimum 18 inch clearance from grade to bottom of floor joists and minimum 12 inch clearance to bottom of girders. Section 2516 (c) 2. 2b' Show pier size, spacing and depth into undisturbed soil. Table 29-A. 205 Show minimum under floor access of 18 inches by 24 inches. Section 2516 (c) 2. 17 4/23/86 Show minimum under floor ventilation equal to 1' sq. ft. for each 150 sq. ft. of under floor area. Openings shall be as close to corners as practicable and shall provide cross ventilation on at least two approximately opposite sides. Section 2516 (c) 6. Specify that posts-embedded in concrete shall be pressure treated per UBC Standard No. 25-12. Section 2516 (c) 1. S. MS0(R! Show veneer support and connections in eismic Zones 3 and 4, comply with Section 3002,- 4p 5, 6 and Section 2515 (a) regarding ties and #9 wire in horizontal joints or show construction to be per attached sheets 30-1 or 30-2. Ni. Show height and construction details of all sonry walls. Chapter 24. ' Nqt 2. Note that cleanout. openings shall be provided the bottom of all cells to be grout filled over 4' in a single pour. Cleanout. shall be sealed before grouting, after inspection. Section 2414 (a) 8. Show floor and roof connections to masonry walls. Connection shall resist 200 pounds per lineal foot or the actual design load, whichever is greater. CrOss grain tension or bending in wood ledgers is not permitted. 'Section 2212 (i) 3. A. 2\. Provide details for damp proofing the foundation walls, below finish grade, where useable space exists on the interior side of the walls. Section 1707 (d). 0 Incorporate in the plans or specifications the attached "Title 24 Mandatory Requirements" and the "Title 24 Construction Compliance Statement Requirements". Q260.:11ease see additional corrections, or ks, on the-following page. The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 619/560-1468, to perform the plan check for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan check items, please contact fPJLJL P)tJ24— at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. Enclosures: SoJ "/2"S • A!/Ar - itlf .4'PC sd,,Jqo7 4 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLAN CHECK NO. 87-86 MARCH 20, 1987 ADDITIONAL CORRECTIONS The beam on grid C between one (1) and two (2) requires a chamber of 1.5 inches (per calculations) The plans show .5 inches. Please show that the grade bam in detail.3/$2 will resist the over—turning moments generated by the .shear panels above. 264 On grid one (1), what is the connection of the 2X6X8 drag strut to, the shear panel? What is the connection of the ..3X-plate tothe GLB's on grids two (2) and three (3)? 265. The-calculations do not address any GUi LAM beams. However, please note, that cantilever beams designed to 24F at the cantilever will be over, stressed with a symbol of 24F-V4 Please review your Si notes If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Manuel Ainza of Esgil Corporation at (619) 560-1468. Thank you. •' ate /17 Jurisdiction cALA Prepared by Bldg. Dept VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE Esgi1 PLAN CHECK NOW.__ BUILDING ADDRESS .I+ •M[).t Rr. APPLICANT/CONTACTURT1 aI.)LE- PHONE BUILDING. OCCUPANCY Z DESIGNER PHONE_____________ TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION ' 0 CONTRACTOR PHONE___________ BUILDING PORTION BUILDING AREA VALUATION MULTIPLIER VALUE TJ\A). JL<oO. [.J5 'H._- _________ • .• I . 1'.. Air Conditioning • • ____________________ Commercial . Q . Residential __________________I_@ • ______________________ Res. orConün. • Fire Sprinklers T . I • j.@ • - Total Value - . 1 ) O Fee Adjusted To Reflect 0 Energy Regulations (Fee x 1.1) C5 7 L47_, • . . C3 Handicapped Reu1ations (Fee x 1.065) - • Building Permit Fee $ •I')?' f 2.7 'X • ,.-t Plan Check F e $ - • ,," 4 a- . - COMMENTS 8/4/82 /3 ADRESSPLAN CHECK 7X PLANNING DATE ZONE: • TYPE OF PROJECT AND USE: &J SCHOOL DISTRICT: SAN DIEGUITO ENCINITAS CARLSBAD SAN MARCUS SIDE REAR DISCRETIONARY ACTIONS: .iI4 REDEVELOPMENT PERMIT REQU ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIRED: COASTAL PERMIT REQUIRED: YES NO ADDITIONAL COM WI OK TO ISSUE:- DATE -. ENGINEERING LEGAL REQUIREMENT,S LEGAL DESCRIPTION VERIFIED? Q— APN CHECKED? 93 EASEMENTS:4..JUYAJY, . RIGHT-OF-WAY: &. 27-'j EDU 'S DRAINAGE: ak _ IMPROVEMENTS: (. dwc;. Z(7- 'I I. ci- FIELD CHECK DATE & INITIALS:__________ PERMITS REQUIRED GRADING: f5 2.%.17 + GRADING COMPLETION CERTIFIED: DRIVEWAY: NDUSTRIAL WASTE: OK 'q FEES REQUIRED PARK-IN-LIEU QUADRANT: ttJ/P , FEE PER UNIT: '/Pr TOTAL P.F.F.:A.M,&.TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE PER UNIT: TOTAL FEE ID u :______________ FACILITIES MGMT. FEE:____________________ BRIDGE & THOROUGHFARE FEE: SEWER FEE (CO 49- Maw NNECTION SEWER LATERAL: • I ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: £. domm .C.t(? Ti •F' '-1 . s 70- 01 336o w Env t&)D ,2JQ6 K E OK TO DATE:________________________ DPDZ;DPD6:10/24/86 • • TRAVIS, VERDUGO, CURRY & ASSOCIATES STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS SAN DIEGO, CA DATE JOB NO. 964,C BY t24v1 SUBJECT_(4!P 21T4? SHEET_ OF________ LEI 1.1" TRAVIS, VERDUGO; CURRY & ASSOCIATES STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS SAN DIEGO, CA DATE JOB NO. ila I C BY SUBJECT 6a4ek2 FÔfl SHEET g7 OF- $ TRAVIS, VERDUGO, CURRY & ASSOCIATES STRUCTURAL cONSULTANTS. - SAN DIEGO, CA DATE, JOB NO. 4Pá'1 BY SUBJECT cMIt4P P7 SHEET 6S OF________ : TRAVIS, VERDUGO, CURRY & ASSOCIATES STPUCTUPAL CONSULTANTS SAN DIEGO CA DATE JOB NO. BY_ SUBJECT IJE$7 ra SHEET E' _OF____ . 2? 4'hv: ff*k FP D1 ffl 4'bit4 I0i - 'F2 L I (I • . I • . I STR CALCULATIDN'S F€881987. S.G.P.A. for: TRAMS, VERDUGO, CURRY &ASSOC. STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS VV' 7851 MISSION CENTER COURT, SUITE 250 SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92108 TRAVIS, VERDUGO, CURRY & ASSOCIATES STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS SAN DIEGO CA DATE -\ JOB NO. BY 41It2 SUBJECT____ SHEET________ OF________ --S TRAVIS, VERDUGO, CURRY & ASSOCIATES STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS SAN DIEGO, CA DATE t7' JOB NO.. ell ________________ BY fr1' SUBJECT _I1c?PTI4 c4111__'9&%k SHEET_ OF________ 4 J?L - ' .Of 3U? ae --------•----- '2-0 ?;* / [•o Pr {c7' i L -er. • ';.)cf7 . ().4." - ----•--- tv• / - -__ ---S _9 _g U - -.... S• 55 •55•5 ,.O 4O 4r1 fr ------ .- --- -. tw i2'TAL Vp MF -(( 74, 111 V i fot~. (. j _• - . . _______ __ Its —".4 Io1r '2-iA a 11) ______L_. I _____ . ,. . . om W,- 4.0 rPf TRA\ISI VERDUGO, CURRY & ASSOCIATES STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS SAN DIEGO, CA . DATE JOBNO.t. -ci SUBJECT J'p! 5Pff'f 1AZ& SHEET A'_Of____ Ito • . • UI - t'2' f -. '••• ••. __ • Wi 7 . .•_. ..Fop- ..r .. . t o - ( 4z PtVI7 ) I. i. •( cow TRAVIS, VERDUGO, CURRY & ASSOCIATES STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS SAN DIEGO, CA DATE t'2'1 'JOB NO. BY_ • Mfr' , SUBJECT_ ,kM1k ' : SHEET _1 OF'______ all rr i - iz1 ' K,O( (J - ' )(t7. , Ar1 lbXl 1 4,- jO.'j (i4, pptl _________ • ;OK '2 I- / •' -' OTL 4 1 1 ...' ' 0(571 X 1,4 TRAVIS, VERDUGO, CURRY & ASSOCIATES STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS SAN DIEGO, CA DATE I -1 JOB NO. BY SUBJECT 41 h% SHEET _412- OF________ a7 14oLr) . 2g 1fftU :. •& k. Zid% ______ - !,Itv I 11x I i -fl1 7 2L. Iry H irI fr1 kx.1ci4'. C,J'2' t; 4a7 TRAVIS, VERDUGO, CURRY & ASSOCIATES STRUOTURAL CONSULTANTS SAN DIEGO, CA DATE J'2' 91 JOBNO.(PI BY ,M2 SUBJECT _'t2*?AfrtIk SHEET_- JF (.rr) 4 1,t) / (I - ____________ 4 - .iyJoTJ- TRAVIS,. VERDUGO, CURRY & ASSOCIATES STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS. SAN CA DATE JOB NO. . BY • • SUBJECT_ cM 1t SHEET_ Of _7 _ çoo S • S • t L •• - S A • J4Ø1-L 'x - - 00 . S S • L' 5 W S L1V .*' U- 'i- ( O'J2% k - - 4i • S 'ik -12'41 j1_ S • 14 4T641.t'tt? S - S (IT ________ S • S ___ S 4 S (ii 55 Art - fe- S . / I12' S S S • _____ TRAVIS, VERDUGO, CURRY & ASSOCIATES STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS SAN DIEGO. CA DATE I _4a - JOB NO. BY tIW -2' SUBJECT 2ez 'At4k4 SHEET OF________ #) lip •'c • A - 1,x H w_• - - r 2- xi% .4 . '24( ( 4 • T ep 1__• •.. LI.-. ,4-O-.,4 -. , •,ij_I_ •/_i••'-_'L e a.. at44LL, 4ft4 ca:: 11 ol M (.i 1t 4 1 - 7-/ ?-• •. • 11 'l ;4l gL •. - /I/ •. TRAVIS, VERDUGO; CURRY & ASSOCIATES STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS SAN DIEGO CA. DATE ____________________ .. . . . JOB NO. BY 7'' SUBJECT _ SHEET / OF________ Pair- 1Iz(cs* 40a,f- a 4*AL - 4 t *L*J 4LL fi a1(' t-7 .41J 1. *)cc1 %1 fr(a)17X-/ IPA . I.1'-' -' 1I , ii fl 7 (4f2 1¼ 10 TRAVIS, VERDUGO, CURRY & ASSOCIATES STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS SAN DIEGO, CA I js. 1 DATE I - / JOB NO. _e6-'441.1'e _______________ BY_______ SUBJECT 1?,A4 I.16 SHEET t'1 OF_______ * vw j k- iI• <--' 4 - /' *L4tc'Ca'ie7 - __ '2?f l4xl4'l t41.: .441, ti4,1I 414 21P / ¶L t t1N ( frJA -___- ...t tr r7) 'WIK (4l/ 7?' C4W1 A *- '. ¼4 i • 71I TRAVIS, VERDUGO, CURRY & ASSOCIATES STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS SAN DIEGO, CA I J1 DATE - JOB NO. BY SUBJECT: fi,kfr1 If4c elE2 OF_____ -- 11f9kt' - S -. I • *; •- '2&' ktf - S ;x7/ - 'Cf - . A n I +xI/* P I x-I TRAVIS, VERDUGO, CURRY & ASSOCIATES STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS SAN DIEGO, CA DATE -(f -7 •. • JOB NO. BY___________ SUBJECT SHEET •'i OF________ _ . 1t1 ri 'jt'1 •• MX j#-t,,V#X Z-/ lej 27 re I 4t, TRAVIS, VERDUGO, CURRY & ASSOCIATES STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS SAN DIEGO, CA DATE I J. i JOB NO. BY______________________ SUBJECT 12F f1kf1 Lt4" SHEET____ OF________ /• / •/ IiI -I- •.t: . 4i øI/' 7. I• f k fr1 4'i i 4KIZ29X(& 14 a __Nci4'% I._L) fr-;-•_ tl Mt.41 x • fr2- ILL. /IJIJ?I:2i4C 14, TRAVIS, VERDUGO, CURRY & ASSOCIATES 'STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS SAN DIEGO CA DATE 'Ifl JOB NO. BY______________________ SUBJECT Z,'çfr1 ()Jc(i SHEET 'O OF________ fr44 + .4 t4 .ofke k) - A1 • )( (tI12 4'2 V2 : —..-.-..1 .2///* x/ •4i 7I -= I9'x 4'1ti 14i,1#2 ,x -f2.-.t-41 41 TRAVIS, VERDUGO, CURRY & ASSOCIATES STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS SAN DIEGO, CA DATE _ JOB NO. BY_________ SUBJECT SHEET 121- OF_______ ¶ic Aby(P'/17O L- 4 *', hL 1L id ••__ __ -w• r . -k fw •• 74 44-- I4cO4 '7x' -& __ tI I .p 1-4 I,! - MAit 1PQ' • i'zc' ' ' I tj, ____I • ______________ • '),fl V.,'.Th ---------------------------------------- Pr tfp, r r . -k • TRAVIS, VERDUGO, CURRY & ASSOCIATES STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS SAN DIEGO, CA JOB NO. BY______________________ SUBJECT_ Ji SHEET 22122 OF________ *z 6) c4 H . Ai•' (1I 7 • ' is'," '4I1 AN (e P •4 yY 1b. 4. H - (;oLor r (. 1 1 /( 1,62 t TRAVIS, VERDUGO, CURRY & ASSOCIATES STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS SAN DIEGO, CA DATE ' -'1 '7 JOB BY Ik2 SUBJECT SHEET SHEET_t OF________ - 1- 'S-' I -. - -, 00 '1 7 dI'7- lip I &j3O &7 .' • lxv el tc'1_ 4o.t/z -- T. irç —r J 1.o 4- Z .4 . 0• • ; •'-' ,j, TRAVIS, VERDUGO, CURRY &ASSOCIATES STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS SAN DIEGO. CA DATE -'7--t' • . • JOB NO. BY__fri k' SUBJECT L,kiiik 1— SHEET 17 ( OF________ tIL'g Aj-r. 41iz— ','c'+ 1'2-x1. kJ.,*W)4 ik- VJALt A. '1 I 41A, __ i ( _iE!'tf 4>) e;p 2 1kr x .ik - 1k4 iz . ,'c otc 41 'Fax- 4ktL I1'2-x .-O ( •• t4z . • row IIO . _____ -........... i41+(4f4 TRAVIS, VERDUGO, CURRY & ASSOCIATES STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS'• SAN DIEGO CA DATE____________ JOB NO. BY___________________ SUBJECT______________________________________ SHEET_ OF_______ 7467-ft WRIPM - kL7T '1IiJ1IiLT1 -701 & 66 JLi ik- - 4;Ap i . 4 - t-A thPc' ' TRAVIS, VERDUGO, CURRY & ASSOCIATES STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS SAN DIEGO, CA DATE_ J09 NO. BY___________________ SUBJECT_____________________________________ SHEET 42!2 OF_______ - Nf* I : Øx4.f tAL , Iry - iAU,I,i 2c ku _1LO2 - TRAVIS, VERDUGO, CURRY & ASSOCIATES STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS SAN DIEGO. CA - DATE 2. - JOB NO: BY fri A' SUBJECT______________________________________________ SHEET 74- OF________ 40 2 //1O - - i5iW4iiL4 clti g', L' 1 10' ;-- --i— £ EAM i./'W -k77 -A7U kiAL .1 L-iW k t'.. i.'-/c , A u_- • -t--7; t/' I•'2- /• . • >fJ UIX /'/Q ' A dkv T- - - r) .JP11 M . -l*zv Lop JO I33HS A8 ON 90P . bzg .110)-Ir. 3.LVO vo os'a NVS S1WflflSNOO lvdfllOfldlS S3IVOOSSV AddflO 'OSfladA 'SIAVdl TRAVIS, VERDUGO, CURRY & 'ASSOCIATES STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS SAN DIEGO, CA JOB NO. DATE SUBJECT _64 2 4 SHEET #O ____ -10 I IL '• f4 ,1 2Vfl7 • +4 I1AIL-ll--k • __ / 5flJi7 AU ii tJPri—r7 —P7vIt7 Hp I4AJLJN flJt2 w/ 44t7 c- t- LL N. 51U- it- 5 -- _ I AL4- L'rWz717 NAu N7MNAL- 1HI4H 11J1 , 4 • 45. A.LL.. NAI k4LJ_ fW, 7MMON WI fze-- 11. MAJ L_. ALL- rV'97 ML1 MAKKP 'APA W/ MXT, cUJr-° vHr PL't7 -rr -ro 5f=,ii-r 0. MIN. IN7IVIr7UL. rIc-:0 SLf, 1 - —'-.c - - - •' , ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES Consulting Soil. Foundation & Geological Engineers Robert R. Prater, C.E. 1942-1980 Wm. David Hespeler, C.E. RECEIVED March 27, 1987 - - MAR 30 1987 239-6E, 7728 -• S.G.P.A. SGPA Planning & Architecture P.O. Box 33326 San Diego, California 92103 - Attention: Mr. Maz Naziall R: Building M - North County Plaza Carlsbad, California Gentlemen: We have reviewed the foundation plans and accompanying Specifications for the subject building. It is our opinion that the plans and. specificationshave incorporated the recommendations presented -in our reports titled "Preliminary - Geotechnical Investigation for North County Plaza, Carlsbad-Oceanside, California," and "Update Report, North County Plaza, Carlsbad Tract 85-2, Carlsbad, California," dated April 30, 1982 and February 214, 1986, respectively. Our services consist of professional opinions and recommendations made In accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and • • - practices. This warranty is in lieu of all' other warranties either express or ' - implied. ••' - If you have any questions, please call. Very truly yours, ' ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATE <e,, co Cpl— UJ NO. 26222 H - - Hughes Investments, Attn: Mr. Brian McConnell (1) - - t - - - - - 10505 Roselle Street, Son Diego, California 92121 (619) 453-5605 -' ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES Consulting Soil. Foundation & Geological Engineers Robert R. Prater, C.E. 1942.1980 Wm. David Hespeler, C.E. November 18, 1986 239-6E, 7492 Hughes Investments 2 Corporate, Plaza Suite 250 Newport Beach, California 92660 Attention: Mr. Brian McConnell Re: Earthwork Observation and Testing Services Building Pads K-L, M Q, R,' S and T North County Plaza Carlsbad, California Specific Plan 187 Gentlemen: t ECEIVEO JAN 13 198l S.G.PA In accordance with your request we are providing earthwork observation and testing services in connection with the subject project. We previously per- formed a geotechnical investigation forthe entire site the results of which were presented in our report titled "Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation, North County Plaza, Carlsbad-Oceanside, California," dated April 30, 1982. Earlier earthwork observation and testing services reports dated November 30, 1982 and November 28, 1983 were issued for the project. A foundation Investi- gation report for Buildings 1 through 5 dated August 16, 1983 was Issued for the project. An update .report dated February 24, 1986 was issued for the project. Earlier earthwork observation and testing services reports dated November 19, 1985, November 5 and November 13, 1986 were issued for Building Pad P, Building Pad N and Building Pads A through H and J, respectively. In addition, a letter dated November 11, 1986 was issued regarding building pad elevations. Commencing on May 1, 1986 our representatives have been present at the site to observe the earthwork operations and to provide' field density -test iiervices In connection with the current grading operations. The results of the field density and laboratory compaction tests for the building pads are presented in the attached Tables A and B, respectively. The approximate locations of the field density tests are shown on the attached Grading Plans, Sheets 2 and 3 of 3. The grading operations for the building pad areas included the removal of the import fill soils from Buena Vista lagoon and the removal and recompaction of the underlying older fills as'-recàmmended In the April 30, 1982 report. The 10505 Roselle Street; San Diego, Calilorni 92121 (619) 453•5505 November 18, 1986 239-6E, 7492 Page 2 approximate limits of the removal and recompaction areas are shown on the attached grading plans. Due to Building Pads K and L being revised to one building pad area, the removal and recompaction included the area between the originally proposed pad areas as shown on Sheet 3 of 3 of the Grading Plans. The surcharge soils were removed from Building !ds.Q, R, S and T. Based on our observations and the attached test results it is our opinion that Building Pads K-L, M, Q R, S and T have been satisfactorily completed and suitably prepared for construction of the proposed buildings with the following additional recommendations. The results of swell tests performed on samples of the exposed subgrade soils are presented in the attached Table C. In order to mitigate the potential for slab damage as a result of the expansion characteristics of the exposed subgrade soils which possess a moderate potential for expansion (greater than 3.5 percent and less than 5.0 percent), we recommend that the exposed subgrade soils for Building Pads Q and R be scarified to a depth of 8 inches, moisture conditioned to 4 percent above laboratory optimum and recompacted to 90 percent relative compaction. This condition should be maintained up until the visqueen and sand layer is placed for the slab areas. For Building Pad Mthe swell test indicated that the soils exposed at or near the finish pad elevation were moderately expansive (5.8%). Accordingly, in accordance with our recommendations a minimum cap of a 6 inch non-expansive type soil (U.B.C. Expansion Index less than 20) was placed as reported in Table D. For Building Pads S and T no remedial work is needed. Our services consist of professional opinions and recommendations made in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices. This warranty is in lieu Of all other warranties either express or implied.. . If you have any questions, please call. Very truly yours, ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES 7? (LI f I No. 22385 I J A. LaBar, C.E. . (xp.9.30.89 iAttachment Copies: Addressee (3) . . . SGPA Planning & Architecture, Attn: Mr. Curt Drake (3) Collins General Contractors, Attn: Mr. Gil Marshall (2) * 239-6E TABLE A - SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM D1556-64 and/or ASTM D2922-78, ASTM D3017-78) Approximate Water Dry Degree of Test Elevation Content Density Compaction Compaction No. Date of Test Test Location (Feet) (%) (pcf) (%) Curve No. Remarks Mass Grading Pavement Area - 1 - 5/2/86 Northeast of Pad P 12 16 105.1 88 1 Test failed Material removed 2 5 /2 /86 Northeast of Pad P 12 16 103.3 87 1 Test failed • : Material removed 3 5/3/86 Northeast of Pad P 12 28 95.8 80 1 Test failed Material removed 4 5/12/86. Northwest of Pad P 12 22 93.2 78 1 Test failed - Material removed 5 5/13/86 Northwest of Pad P 12 20 94.3 79 1 Test failed Material removed 6 5/21/86 East of Pad R 8 13 101.7 86 4 Test failed, See #11 7 5/21/86 Southeast of Pad Q 8 12 113.9 95 1 8 5/21/86 East of Pad S 14 8 112.5 914 1 9 5/21/86 East of Pad T 111 11- 99.2 84 4 Test failed, See #23 10 5/21/86 Northeast of Pad S 114 13 105.1 89 4 Test failed, See #31 11 5/21/86 East of Pad R 8 10 107.5 91 4 Retest of #6 12 5/21/86 Southeast of Pad R * 9 10 110.2 93 * 13 5/22/86 Northeast of Pad R 9 10 107.0 90 4 Notes: j) "Compaction curve No " refers to Unuess otherwise noted elevations Table B. ij shown are to nearest foot. 239-6E TABLE A - SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM D1556-64 and/or ASTM D2922-78, ASTM D3017-78) Approximate Water Dry Degree of Test - Elevation Content Density Compaction Compaction No. Date of Test Test Location (Feet) (%) (pcf) (%) Curve No. Remarks 14 5/22/86 East of Pad R 11 14 101.3 85 4 Test failed, See #18 15 5/22/86 East of Pad R 11 12 98.6 83 4 Test failed, See #19 16 5/22/86 Northeast of Pad Q 11 12 -108.8 92 4 17 5/22/86 East of Pad 0 11 15 107.2 90 4 18 5/22/86 East of Pad R 11 12 107.7 91 4 - Retest of #14 19 5/22/86 East of Pad R 11 12 106.9 90 4 Retest of #15 20 .5/22/86 Southeast of Pad R 13 14 107.2 90 4 21 5/22/86 Southeast of Pad Q. 13 10 109.5 92 4 22 5/22/86 Northeast of Pad R 14 . 11 111.1 94 4 23 5/23/86 East of Pad T 14 8 108.2 91 4 Retest of #9 24 5/23/86 Northeast of Pad S 14 14 103.3 87 4 Test failed, See #31 25 5/23/86 West of Pad P 8 14 109.2 87 5 Test failed, See #45 26 5/23/86 East of Pad Q 14 12 108.6 92 4 27 5/23/86 East of Pad Q 14 17 106.9 - 90 4 28 5/23/86 East of Pad T - 15 14 106.9 90 4 29 5/23/86 East of Pad R 15 17 108.4 -. 91 4 30 - 5/23/86 East of Pad Q 16 .. 14 .109.7 93 4 . Notes: j) "Compaction curve No." refers to Table B. ij Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. 239-6E TABLE A.-: SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM D1556-64 and/or ASTM D2922-78, ASTMD3017-78) Approximate Water Dry Degree of Test Elevation Content Density Compaction Compaction No. Date of Test Test Location (Feet) (%) (pcf) (%) Curve No. Remarks 31 5/27 /86 NOrtheast of Pad S 14 15 106.7 90 4 Retest of #'S 10 & 24 32 5/27/86 Northeast of Pad P 12 13 101.4 85 1 Test failed, See #33 33 5/27/86 Northeast of Pad P 12 12 107.8 90 1 Retest of #32 34 5/27/86 Northeast of Pad 0 17 15 109.1 92 4 35 5/27/86 East of Pad S 17 10 112.0 95 4 36 5/27/86 East of Pad T 17 16 107.8 91 4 37 5/27/86 Northeast of Pad P 13 13 108.5 92 4 38 5/27/86 Northeast of Pad P 11$ 17 105.0 89 4 Test failed, See #44 39 5/28/86 East of Pad R 17 ' 14 112.6 95 4 40 5/28/86 East of Pad 0 17 15 108.1. 91 '4 141 5/28/86 East of Pad S 18 17 107.8 91 4 ' 42 5/28/86 East of Pad S 18 15 109.7 93 4 43 5/28/86 East of Pad Q 18 15 112.0 93 2 44 5/29/86 'Northeast of Pad P 111 12 111.2 94 4 'Retest of #38 45 5/29/86 West of Pad P ' 8 11 112.9 90 5 Retest of #25 46 ' 5/29/86 North of Pad P 15 9 111.5 94 4 47 5/29/86. North of Pad P 16 12 110.1 93 4 Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No 11 refers to Table B. 2) Unlessotherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. - . 2396E TABLE A- SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TESTRESULts(ASTMb 1556-64 and/or AStM -'1)2922-78,- ASTM D3017-78) Approximate Water Dry Degree of Test . . Elevation' Content Density Compaction Compaction No. Date of Test. Test Location (Feet) (%) (pcf) (%) Curve No. Remarks 48 5/29/86 East of Pad R 18 15 112.9 94 2 49 6/3/86 Northwest of Pad P 9 ' 16 109.2 91 2 . 50 6/3/86 . West of Pad P 9 17 109.9. 91 2 51. 6/3/86 Southeast of Pad 'Q 9. 14 114.3 91 5 52 6/3186 Northwest of Pad P 10 15 105.5 89 4 Test failed, See #58 53 6/3/86 Northwest of Pad P 10 15 103.8 88 4 Test failed, See #58 54 6/3/86 Northwest of Pad P 10 . 16 101.4 .86 4 Test failed, See #57 55 6/3/86 West of Pad P 10 16 105.6 89 . 1$ Test failed, See #59 56 6/3/86 Southeast of Pad Q 11. 23 99.9 84 11 Test failed, See #60 57 6/3/86 Northwest of Pad P 10 17 106.9 90 4 Retest of #54 • 58 6/3/86 Northwest of PadP • 10 16 107.0 90 4 Retest of #'s 52 6 53 59 6/3/86 West of Pad P • 10 14 108.8 92 4 Retest of #55 60 6/3/86 Southeast of Pad Q 11 14 108.8 92 4 •• • Retest of #56 61 6/3/86 •. Northwest of Pad P '12 13 109.4 91 2 62 6/3/86 West of Pad P -. 12 13 - 110.8 92 • 2 63 6/4/86 West of Pad P • 12 11 116.6 93 . . 5 - 64 6/4/86 West of Pad P • 12 14 113.7 90 6 Notes: 1) "Cçmpactjon Curve No ,'I refers to ij Uniess otnerwise noted elevations Table B. . • shown are to nearest - foot. 239-6E TABLE A SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY 'TEST RESULTS (ASTMD1S56-61$ and/or ASTM D2922-78. ASTM D3017-78) Approximate Water Dry Degree of Test . - Elevation Content Density Compaction Compaction No. bate of Test Test Location (Feet) (%) (pcf.) (%) Curve 'No. Remarks 65 6/4 /86 Northwest of Pad P , 12 114 114.6 91 6 66 6/4/86 Northwest of Pad P 14 114 110.1' 87 5 Test failed, See #69 67 6/4/86 West of Pad P 14 16 111.0 92 2 68 6/4/86 West of Pad P 13 17 111.4 93 2 69 6/4/86 Northwest of Pad P 114 13 113.2 90 5 Retest of #66 70 6/4/86 'Northwest of Pad P 14 12 113.5 90 5 71 6/4/86 West of Pad' P 15 12 118.9 93 7. 72 6/4/861 Northwest of Pad P .15 17 111.3 92 2 73 6/5/86 West of Pad P . 16 16 109.1 91 2 714 6/5/86 Northwest of Pad P 16 20 103.5 87 4 Test failed, See #75 75 6/5/86 Northwest of Pad P 16 19 106.2 90 4 Retest of #714 76 6/5/86 . North of Pad P 14 16 113.6 90 5 , 77 6/5/86 'West of Pad P . , . 17 22 97.0 82 .4 Test failed, See #81 78 6/5/86 North of Pad P 111 15 108.9 90 8 79 6/5/86 North of Pad P . ' 15 114 .106.6 90 14 . 80 6/5/86. North of Pad P 11 18 108.5 90 8 81 6/6/86 West of Pad P .' 17 . 17 106.7 ' 90 4 Retest of #77 Notes: 1) "CQmpactLon curve No refers to - i; Unie&s otherwise noted elevations shown are Table B. to nearest foot. 239-6E TABLE A - SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM D1556-64 and/or ASTM D2922-78, ASTM D3017-78) Aooroximate Water. Dry Dearee of Test . Elevation Content Density Compaction Compaction No. Date-of Test Test Location (Feet) (%) (pcf)' (%) Curve No. . Remarks 82 6/6/86 North of Pad P 13 19 100.14 85 14 Test failed, See #83 83 6/6/86 North of Pad P. 13 9 110.9 92 2 Retest.of #82 84 6/6/86 North of Pad P 14 13 106.3 90 4 Building Pad Areas 85 7/11/86 Building Pad B 9 13 112.8 90 9 86 7/14/86 Building Pad A. 11 . :16 110.2 91 8 87 7/14/86 Building Pad B 13 11 108.9 90 8 88 7/14/86 Building Pad A 15 17 110.6 91 8 89 7/15/86 . Building Pad B 17 . 13 113.6 90 . 5 90 7/15/86 Building Pad B 10 12 115.2 91 5 91 7/15/86 Building Pad C 12 14 114.14 91 5 92 . 7/16/86 Building Pad D 14 14 112.7 90 9 93 7/16/86 Building Pad D 16 12 116.8 93 . 5 94 7/17/86 Building Pad D 8 21 102.2 84 8 95 7/17/86 Building Pad D 8 20 105.6 87 . 8 96 7/17/86 Building Pad 8 16 111.5 92 8 97 7/18/86 Building Pad D . 10 12 112.9 90 5 Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No." refers to Table B. 2) Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot.. Test failed Material removed Test failed Material removed 239-6E TABLE A - SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM D1556-64 and/or ASTM D2922-78,' ASTM D3017-78) Approximate Water Dry Degree of Test Elevation Content Density Compaction Compaction No. Date of Test Test Location (Feet) (%) (pcf) (%) Curve No. Remarks 98 7/18/86 Building Pad C . 10 13 114.8 91 5 99 7/21/86 Building Pad C 12 16 115.2 91 5 100 7/21/86 Building Pad D 12 - 15 112.9 90 5 101 7/21/86 . Building Pad B iLl 14 114.4 91 5 102 7/21/86 Building Pad D i4' 14 113.4 90 5 103 7/22/86 Building Pad A 10 16 113.5 90 5 104 7/22/86 Building Pad B 10 18 113.0 90 5 105 7/22/86 . Building Pad B 10 18 110.3 88 5 - Test failed, See #106 106 7 /23/86 Building Pad B 10 17 113.5 90 5 Retest of #105 107 7/23/86 Building Pad B 12 16 113.8 90 • 5 108 7/23/86 Building Pad A 114 16 113.4 90 5 109 7/24/86 Building Pad B 16 .14 113.4 93 10 110 7/24/86 Building Pad C 16 15 112.3 92 10 111 7/24/86 Building Pad D • . 16 15 112.3 92 10 . 112 8/28/86 Building Pad M 11 - . .14 • 109.6 90 10 113 8/28/86 Building Pad M 11 14 110.9 91 10 114 8/28/86 Building Pad N 11 14 110.3 91 10 Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No." refers to Table B. • 2) Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. " •. ... . . • 239-6E TABL.-SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM b j5-66 nd/br ASTMD2922-78, ASTM D3017-78) Approximate Water Dry Degree of Test . Elevation Content Density Compaction Compaction No. Date of .Test Test Location (Feet) (pcf) (%) Curve No. Remarks 115 8/28/86 Building Pad N 11 15 109.8 90 10 116 8/29/86 Building Pad M 13 13 110.7 91 10 117 8/29/86 Building Pad N 13 114 112.0 92 10 118 8/29/86 Building Pad N 15 16 113.0 90 5 119 8/29/86 Building Pad M 15 16 . 110.9 91 10 120 9/2/86 Building Pad M 16 16 1114.4 91 5 121 9/2 /86 Building Pad M 16 13 110.9 91 10 122 9/2/86 Building Pad N 16 14 109.4 90 10 123 9/2 /86 Building Pad N 16 17 115.0 91 5 1214 9/3/86 Building Pad M 17 17 110.8 91 10 125 9/3 /86 Building Pad M 17 16 1114.7 91 5 126 9/3/86 Building Pad N 17 114 111.5 92 10 127 -9/3/86 . Building Pad N 17 17 1114.8 91 5 5 128 9/4/86 Building Pad K 12 13 115.0 91 5 129 9/4/86 Building Pad K 12 13 109.6 90 10 130 9/4/86 Building Pad L ' 12 17 113.6 90 5 Pavement Area 131 9/4/86 West of Building Pad K 14 114 1114.1 91 5 Notes: 0 "Compaction Curve No." refers to Table B. 2) Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. - . 239-6E- TABLE A - SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM D1556-64 and/or ASTM D2922-78, ASTM D3017-78) Approximate Water Dry Degree of Test . Elevation Content Density Compaction Compaction No. Date of Test Test Location (Feet) (%) (pcf) (%) Curve No. Remarks 132 914186 West of Building Pad K 14 13 109.8 90 10 133 9/4/86 West of Building Pad L 114 13 111.1 91 10 Building Pad Areas 134 9/5/86 Building Pad K 12 17 100.7 81 9 Test failed, See #137 135 9/5/86 Building Pad K 12 21 1014.2 84 9 Test failed, See #138 136 9/5/86 Building Pad L 12 17 113.7 90 5 137 9/8/86 Building Pad K 12 14 113.0 90 5 Retest of #1314 138 9/8/86 Building Pad K 12 13 113.5 90 5 Retest of #135 139 9/8/86 Building Pad M 18(FSG) 14 113.7 90 5 140 9/8/86 Building Pad K 14 12 112.5 93 10 141 9/8/86 Building Pad L 114 12 112.3 92 10 1142 9/8/86 Building Pad D 19(FSG) 10 109.1 90 10 143 9/9/86 Building Pad L 16 19 108.8 90 10 144 9/9/86 Building Pad K 16 18 110.0 91 10 145 9/9/86 Building Pad L 18 21 105.8 87 10 Test failed Material removed 146 9/9/86 Building Pad K 18 17 111.3 92 10 147 9/9/86 Building Pad J 10 10 113.0 93 10 148 9/9/86 Building Pad H 10 11 111.7 92 10 Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No." refers to Table B. . . Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. .. . "FSG" denotes finish subcirade elevation.... 239-6E TABLE A - SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM D1556-64 and/or ASTM D2922-78, ASTM D3017-78) Approximate Water Dry Degree of Test Elevation Content Density compaction Compaction No. Date of Test Test Location (Feet) (%) (pcf) (%) Curve No. Remarks 1149 9/9/86 Building Pad G 10 13 112.3 92 10 150 9/9/86 Building Pad J 12 15 112.8 93 10 151 9/10/86 Building Pad H 12 18 110.3 91 10 152 9/10/86 Building Pad G 12 18 109.7 90 10 153 9/10/86 Building Pad J 14 18 110.8 91 10 1514 9 /10/86 Building Pad H 114 19 111.5 92 10 155 9/10/86 Building Pad C 14 18 109.1 90 10 156 9/10/86 Building Pad J 16 18 109.6 90 10 157 9/10/86 Building Pad H 16 • 17 110.14 91 10 158 9/10/86 Building Pad C 16 18 111.9 92 10 159 9/10/86 Building Pad J 18 19 106.8 88 10 Test failed, See #23 160 9/10/86 Building Pad H 18 20 • 105.9 87 10 Test failed, See 423 161 9/10/86 Building Pad C 18 19 106.7 88 10 Test failed, See #23 162 9/10/86 Building Pad J 10 14 112.0 92 10 163 9/10/86 Building Pad G-1 10 14 112.6 93 10 164 9/10/86 Building Pad F 10 15 110.0 91 10 Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No." refers to Table B. .2) Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. 239-6E TABLE A - SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM D1556-64 and/or ASTM D2922-78, ASTM D301778) Approximate Water Dry Degree of Test Elevation Content Density Compaction Compaction No. Date of Test Test Location (Feet) (%). (pcf) (%) Curve No. Remarks Pavement Area 165 9/10/86 West of Pad K 16 114 112.2 95 14 Building Pad Area 166 9/10/86 Building Pad F 12 17 111.0 91 167 9/10/86 Buiding Pad C 12 12 115.14 93 168 9/10/86 Building Pad H 12 15 111.14 92 169 9/10/86 Building Pad F iLl 17 110.6 91 170 9/10/86 Building Pad H 14 16 113.5 91 .171 9/10/86 Building Pad J 111 16 109.8 90 172 9/11/86 Building Pad F 16 16 1114.2 92 173 9/11/86 Building Pad H 16 17 115.4 93 174 9/11/86 Building Pad J 16 16 110.3 91 175 9/11/86 Building Pad F 18 16 : 114.7 92 176 9/11/86 Building Pad G 18 15 115.4 93 177 9/11/86 Building Pad H. 18 14 114.0 91 Pavement Area 178 9/11/86 West of Pad K 17 114 112.3 95 Notes: "Compaction Curve No." refers to Table B. - Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. 10 9 10 10 9 10 9 9 10 9 9 9 LI 239-6E TABLE A - SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITYTEST RESULTS (ASTM D1556-64 and/or ASTM D2922-78, ASTM D3017-78) Approximate Water Dry Degree of Test Elevation Content Density compaction Compaction No. Date of Test Test Loàatlón (Feet) (%) (pcf) Curve No. Remarks 179 9/11/86 West of Pad K 18 14 .110.1 93 4 180 9/11/86 West of Pad K 18 14 110.2 ' 93 4 Building Pad Areas . 181 9/11/86 Building Pad E 10 16 110.9 91 10 182 9/11/86 Building Pad F 10 16 111.5 92 10 183 9/11/86 Building Pad H 10 16 111.8 92 10 181$ 9/11/86 Building Pad J 10 17 109.9 90 10 185 9/12/86 . Building Pad E ' 12 16 .' 110.0 ' . 91, 10 186 9/12/86 Building Pad F 12 15 110.5 91 10 187 9/12/86 Building Pad J 12 16 111.5 92 10 188. 9/12/86 Building Pad E 14 ' 18 110.3 91 10 189 9/12/86 ., BuildingPad F iLl '18 109.7 90 10 ... 190 9/12/86. . Building Pad H 11$ 19 108.9 90 10 191 9 /12/86 Building Pad J 14 18 109.14 91 10 Pavement Area 192 9/13/86 South of Pad B 12 14 110.1 92 - 1 193 - 9/13/86 Southof Pad A 13 14 110.7 93 .1 action Curve No " refers to Table B. Notes: 3) otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. TABLE A - SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASmj 1556-64 and/or 239-6E ASTM D2922-78, ASTM D3017-73) Approximate Water Dry. Degree of Test Elevation Content Density Compaction Compaction No. Date of Test Test Location (Feet) '(%) (pcf) (%) Curve No. Remarks 194 9/13/86 South of Pad C 14 14 110.7 93 1 195 9/13/86 South of Pad D 15 15 111.5 93 1 Building Pad Areas 196 9/15/86 Building Pad L 18 21 105.0 86 10 Test failed Material removed 10 Test failed Material removed 10 Test Jailed Material removed .197 9/15/86 Building Pad L 18 21 104.3 86 198 9/15/86 Building Pad L 18 21 105.2 87 Pavement Area . . 199 9/15/86 South of Pad D 17 14 111.14 93 200 9/15/86 South of Pad C 16 14 112.2 94 201 9/15/86 South of Pad B 15 14 112.6 94 202 9/16/86 South of Pad A 16 11$ 113.7 95 203 9/16/86 South of Pad 17 14 111.4 93 204 9/16/86 South of Pad C 17 14 111.3 93 205 9116/86 Sóuthof Pad A 17 114 112.4 94 206 9/17/86 South of Pad A 12 14 . 111.91 94 207 9/17/86 South of Pad B 13 6 111.4 93 208 .9/17/86 South of Pad C 114 15 111.4 93 Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No." refers to Table B. 2), Unless otherwise noted elevations shown 'are to nearest foot. TABLE A - SUMMARY 239-6E OF FIELDD'ENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM .D1556-64 and/or AST 78, ASTM 1j3017-78) Approximate Water 'Dry Degree of Test - . Elevation Content Density Compaction Compaction No. 'Date of Test Test Location , . '(Feet) ' () (pcf) (%) Curve No. Remarks 209 ' 9/17/86 , South of Pad , . 14 '15 112.2 94 ' 1 ' 210 , 9/18/86 South of Pad A 16 , 15 ' 110.7 93 1 ' 211 9/18/86 South of Pad B 16 ' ' ' 15 . ' 109.8' 92 1 212 9/18/86 South of Pad D , 16 ' 15 111.0 93 1 213 ' 9/18/86' South of Pad B . 17 , 14 111.0 93 1 Building Pad Areas 214 9/18/86 Building Pad J , 16 19 107.8 89 , 10 Test failed,' See #215 215 9/18/86 Building PadJ . 16 , 18 109.8 - 90 ' 10 Retest of 1214 216 9/18/86 Building Pad J ' ' 17 ' 18 110.7 91 ' '10 217 9/18/86 Building Pad J 18 IT . 111.8 92 10 218 9/19/86 Building Pad H . ' 16 15 110.6 91 ' , 10 .219 9/19/86 Building Pad H . 18 .16 111.1' . 91 10 220 9/19/86 Building Pad G .16 , 16 .109.14 90 10 ' 221 9/19/86 Building Pad C ' ,18 17 , 113.0 93 - 10 222 ' 9/19/86 Building Pad' J 16 17 110.6 91 10 223 9/19/86 Buiding Pad J 18 17 109.1$ 90 10 224 9119/86 Building Pad F 16 ,' 16 110.7 91 10. ' Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No." refers to Table B. 2) Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. ' 18 17 111.1 18 17 109.8 18 16. 110.0 Building Pad Areas 235 9/23 /86 Building Pad J 236 9/23/86 . Building Pad H 237 9/23/86 Building Pad G 91 10 , Retest of #'s 159&226 90 • 10 Retest of #160 91 10 Retest of#161 239-6E TABLE A - SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM D1556-64 and/or ASTM D2922-78, ASTM D3017-78.) Approximate Water Dry Degree of Test S . Elevation. Content Density Compaction. Compaction No. Date of Test Test Location (Feet) (%) (pcf) (%) Curve No. Remarks 225 9/19/86 Building Pad F 18 16 111.2 92 10 226 9 /22/86 Building Pad J 18 19 109.14 88 11 Test failed, See #235 227 9/22/86 Building Pad H 16 16 110.7 91 10 228 9/22 /86 Building Pad -H. . 18 16 109.7 90 10 229 9 /22/86 Building Pad G 16 17 111.8 92 10 230 9/22/86 Building Pad C 18 16 . 111.9 92 10 - 231.-,9/22/86 Building Pad F .16 16 110.2 91 . 10 232 9/22/86 Building Pad F . 18 17 112.1 92 10 Storm Drain Trench Backfill 233 9/23/86 Rim Road - East of Pad E FSG 10 109.4 89 13 Test failed Material removed 234 9/23/86 Rim Road East of Pad H FSG 10 107.14 87 13 . Test failed Material removed Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No." refers to Table B. Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. "FSG" denotes finish subgrade elevation. 239-6E TABLE A - SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (AStM D1556 ,and/or ASTM 02922-78, A'STM D3O17-78) Approximate Water Dry Degree of Test Elevation Content Density Compaction Compaction No. Date of Test Test Location (Feet) (%) (pcfl (%) Curve No. Remarks Pavement Area 238 9/26/86 East of Pad R FSG 15 108.8 91 1 239 9/26/86 East of Pad R FSG 14 107.8 90 1 240 9/29/86 East of Pad S FSG 14 109 ..8 92 1 241 9/29/86 East of Pad Q FSG 14 109.1 91 1 Building Pad Areas 242 9/30/86 Building Pad L 18 20 106.2 87 10 Test failed Material removed 243 9/30/86 Building Pad L 18 20 107.5 88 10 Test failed Material removed 244 9/30/86 Building Pad K 19 21 105.6 87 10 Test failed Material removed 2145 10/1/86 Building Pad L 17 16 111.5 90 13 246 10/1/86 Building Pad L 18 17 111.2 90 13 247 10/1/86 Building Pad L 18 17 111.3 90 13 2148 10/1/86 Building Pad L 19 19 109.2 88 13 Test failed, See #2514 249 10/1/86 Building Pad L 19 19. 108.8 88 13 Test failed, See #255 250 10/1/86 Building Pad L 19 19 109.8 89 13 Test failed, See #256 Pavement Area 250A 10/6/86 Rim Road - East of Pad E FSG 111' 126.3 914 12 Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve Na." refers to Table B. -. 2) Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. 239-6E TABLE A - SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESUL Approximate Water Dry Degree of Test Elevation Content Density Compaction Compaction No. S Date of Test Test Location (Feet) (%) (pcf) (%) Curve No. Remarks•• 251 10/6/86 Rim Road - East of Pad F FSG 13 117.7 595 11 252 10/6/86 Rim Road - East of Pad G FSG 12 .116.5 914 11 253 10/6/86 Rim Road - East of Pad i FSG 12 119.1 96 11 Building Pad Areas . 254 10/6/86 Building. Pad L 19 17 112.4 91 . 13 Retest of #248 255 10/6/86 Building Pad L 19 17 111.4 90 13 Retest of #249 256 10/6/86 Building Pad L 19 15 114.9 93 13. Retest of #250 Pavement Area 257 10/6/86 Rim Road - East of Pad E FBG 6 134.8 96 14 258 10/6/86 Rim Road - East of Pad.J FBG 5 134.0 96 .14 5 259 10/6/86 Rim Road - East of Pad G FBG 14 134.14 96 14 260 10/6/86 Rim Road - Northeast of Pad KFBG . 5 1314.9 . 96 14 Sewer Line Trench Backfllt . 261 10/6/86 North of Pad B FSG-1' 16 111.6 90 13 . Lateral 262 10/6/86 North of Pad C FSG-1' 16 112.4 91 13 Lateral 263 10/6/86 North of Pad B FSG 14 112.8 91 13 Lateral Notes: . 1) "Compaction Curve No." refers to Table B. Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. "FSG" denotes finish subgrade elevation. S "FBG" denotes finish base grade elevation. S 239-6E TABLE A - SUMMARY OF FIELDbENSITY TEST REUL ASThI Di556-64 and/or AS tM D2922-78. AS D3017-78) • Approximate Water Dry Degree of Test Elevation Content Density Compaction Compaction No. Date of Test Test Location (Feet) (%) (pcf) (%) Curve No. Remarks • Building Pad Areas - 264 10/9/86 Building Pad E 16 17 113.7 91 11 Sewer Line Trench Backfill 265 10/9/86 West of Pad A FSG-10' 14 110.3 91 10 Building Pad Areas 266 10/9/86 Building Pad E 17 16 112.7 90 11 Sewer Line Trench Backfill 267 10/9/86 Southwest of Pad 'A FSG-9' 111 109.6 92 1 Building Pad Areas . 268 10/9/86 Building Pad E 19 15 113.9 91 11 Sewer Line Trench Backfill 269 10/9 /86 Southwest of Pad A FSG-8' 14 108.9 91 1 270 10/13/86 West of Pad A FSG-7' • 16 116.0 93 11 271 10/13/86 East of Pad T FSG-2' 14 103.6 83 11 Test failed, See #272 - - Lateral 272 10/14/86 East of Pad T FSG-2' 13 111.9. 90 11 Retest of #271 Lateral 273 10/14/86 East of Pad S FSG-3' 15 107.8 86 11 Test failed, See #281 . . - - Làtèral Notes: "Compaction Curve No." refers to Table B. • - Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. "FSG" denotes finish subgrade elevation. . V. 239-6E TABLE A -SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULT.(A9TM b16- and/or ASTM b -A5TMb3017-78 Approximate Water Dry Degree of Test : Elevation Content Density Compaction Compaction No. Date of Test Test Location (Feet) (%) (pcf) Curve No. Remarks 274 10/114/86 East of Pad S FSG_31 17 107.1 86 11 Test failed, See #281 Lateral Building Pad Areas - 275 10/14/86 Building Pad D 19(FSG) 11 114.8 92 11 276 10/114/86 Buidlng Pad D 19(FSG) 114 118.1 95 11 • Sewer Line Trench Backfill 277 10/14/86 West of Pad A FSC-5' 15 112.4 90 11 278 10/14/86 West of Pad A FSG-14' 14 117.5 94 - 11 279 10/14/86 Station 15+25 FSG-8' 14 108.2 87 11 Test failed, See #282 280 10114/86 Station 16+25 FSG-8' 17 101.5 84 10 Test failed, See #283 281 10/15/86 East of Pad S . . FSG-3' 13 115.5 93 11 Retest of #'s 2736274 282 10/15/86 Station 15+25 FSG-8' 14 111.8 90 11 Retest •of #279 283 10/16/86 Station 16+25 FSG-8' 16 109.6 90 10 Retest of #280 284 10/16/86 Station 15+20 FSG-6' 114 111.14 92 10 285 10/16/86 Station 14+50 . FSG-6' 14 107.2 . 88 10 Test failed, See #286 286 10/16/86 Station 14+50 FSG-6' 14 114.5 94 10 Retest of #285 287 10/17/86 Station 16+55 FSG-6' 14 112.6 93 10 288 10/17/86 Station 16+30 • FSG-6' 14. 112.0 92 10 . Notes: j) "CQmpácon curve No ° refers Unies otnerwise noted elevations to Table B. ij shown are to nearest foot. 3) "FSG" denotes finish subgrade elevation. 239-6E TABLE A - SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM D1556-614 and/or ASTM D2922-78, ASTM D3017-7e) Approximate Water Dry Degree of Test : •. Elevation Content Density Compaction Compaction No. Date of Test Test Location (Feet)'(%) (pcf) ' (%)° Curve No. Remarks 289 .10/17/86 Station 18+40 FSG-2' 17 108.8 90 10 290. 10/17/86 Station 17+10 FSG-4' 16 108.8 90 10 291 10/17/86 ' Station 16+00 FSG-4' 15 108.9 90 10 292 10/17/86 Station 15+02 FSG-4' 15 114.1 94 10 293 10/17/86 Station 20+00 FSG-2' 15 99.7 82 10 Test failed, See #296 294 10/17/86 Station .19+40 FSG72' 14 106.3 - 87 10 Test failed, See #297 295 10/17/86 West of Pad K FSG-2' 19 100.1 82 10 Test failed, See #298 Lateral 296 10/20/86 Station 20+00 FSG-2' 15 109.1 90 10 Retest of #293 297 10/20/86 Station 19+40 . FSG-21 '14 . 114.5 94 10 Retest of #294 .298 10/20/86 West of Pad K FSG-2' 14 116.1 96 10 Retest of #295 Lateral 299 10/20/86 Station 20+35 FSG 13 109.1 90 10 300 10/20/86 Station 21+00 FSG 13 114.7 94 10 301 10/20/86 West of Pads K & L FSG-1' 16 112.1 92 10 Lateral 302 10/20/86 West of Pads K & L FSG 13 115.0 95 10 Lateral 303 10/20/86 Station 19+20 FSG 14 118.8 95 11 304 10/20/86 Station 17+60 ' FSG 15 112.2 90 11 Notes: 1) "CompactIon Curve No. refers otherwise noted elevations to Table B. . - 2J UnIes shown, are to nearest foot. 3) "FSG" denotes. finish subgrade elevation. 239-6E TABLE A - SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (AS TM D1556-6L4 and/or ASTM D2922-78, ASTM D3017-781 Approximate Water Dry Degree of Test . . Elevation Content Density Compaction Compaction No. Date of Test Test Location (Feet) (%) (pcf) Curve No. Remarks 305 10/20/86 Station 16+50 . FSG-2' 14 112.6 90 11 306' .10/20/86 Station 14+90 FSG-2' 14 115.6 93 . 11 307 10/20/86 Station 12+60 FSG-2' 14 119.3 .96 11 308 10/20/86 Station 10+90 FSG-2' 14 114.7 92 ' 11 309 10/20/86 Station 16+40 FSG 14 114.1 92 11 310 10/20/86 Station 15+20 FSG 14 113.0 91 = 11 311 10/20/86 Station 12+10 FSG 13 .120.8 97 11 312 10/20/86 South of Pad J FSG-11 13 115.8 93 11 Lateral Storm Drain Trench 'Backfill 313 10/20/86 East of Pad R FSG-2' 14 111.9 90 11 314 10/21/86 South of Pad J FSG-6' 13 115.7 93 11 315 10/21/86 East of Pad Q FSG-2' 13 108 6 92 4 316 10/21/86 East of Pad J. FSG 13 114.9 92 11 317 10/21/86 West of Pad .1 FSG-0.5' 15 112.8 91 11 318 10/21/86 South of Pad C FSG-0.51 13 1 .10 .7 91 10 - 319 10/21/86 -South of Pad C ' .- FSG-0.5' 12 112.0 - 92 10 - Notes: 1) "compaction' Curve No." refers to; Table B. 2)- Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to' nearest foot. 3) "FSG" denotes finish' subgrade elevation. 327 10/22/86 328 10/22/86 329 10/23/86 330 10/23/86 Building Pad Area Between Buildings K & L Water Line Trnch Baékfill West of Pad L North of Pad B North of Pad B 18 17 FSG-2' 13 FSG-6' ii FSG-8' 10 239-6E TABLE A - SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM D1556-64 and/or ASTM D2922-78 ASTM D3017-78 Approximate Water Dry Degree of Test Elevation Content Density Compaction Compaction No. Date of Test Test Location (Feet) (%) (pcf) (%) Curve No. Remarks Sewer Line Trench Backfill 320 10/21/86 Northwest of Pad A FSG-6' .114 . 112.2 90 11 Manhole #2 321 10/21/86 Northwest of Pad A FSG-4' 114 113.5 9.1 11 Manhole #2 322 10/22/86 North of Pad B FSG-7' 15 112.2 90 11 323 10/22/86 North of Pad /' . FSG-5' 16 110.14 89 11 Test failed, See #325 321$ 10/22 /86 Northwest of Pad A FSG-2' 16 106.6 88 . 10 Test failed, See #326 Manhole #2 325 10/22/86 North of Pad A FSG-5' 15 118.0 95 11 Retest of #323 326 10/22/86 Northwest of Pad A FSG-21, 111 113.3 93 10. Retest of #3214 Manhole #2 1114.3 92 11 1014.3 86 10 Test failed V Material removed 96.8 80 10 . Test failed, See #332 Manhole #1 97.5 80 10 Test failed, See #331 Manhole #1 Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No." refers to Table B. 2) Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. V "FSG" denotes finish subgrade elevation. V 18 :.14 113.4 93 10 19 . 21 107.1 88' . 10 19. - 14 112.4 .93 • 10' 20(FSG) 11 117.0 96 10 20(FSG) 8 109.7 90 . 10 20(FSG) 10 115.3 95 10 20(FSG) 15 • 112.6 93 10 20(FSG) 13 119.5 94 7 Test failed, See #335 Retest of #'s• 2446334 FSG-2' 7 116.2 96 10 17 18 '• 112.2 89 5 Test failed Material removed • 239-6E TABLE A -SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM D1556-64 and/or ASTM D2922-78, ASTM 1)3017-7) Approximate Water Dry Degree of Test Elevation Content Density Compaction Compaction No. Date of Test Test Location.''(Feet) - (%) (pcf) (%) Curve No. Remarks 331 10/23/86 North of Pad B FSG_81 13 111.7 92 10 Retest of #330 Manhole #1 332 10/23/86 North of Pad B FSG-6' 11 . 115.1 95, 10 Retest of #329 Manhole #1 Building Pad 'Areas 333 10/23/86 Building Pad K 334 10/23/86 Building Pad K 335 10/23186 Building Pad K. 336 10/23/86 Building Pad, K 337 10/23/86 Building Pad K 338 10/23/86 Between Pads K & L 339 10/23/86 Building Pad L . 340 10/23/86 Building Pad L Planter Backfill .341 10/28/86 South of Pad D BuildingPad. Areas 342 10/29/86 BuiIding Pad N = Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No." refers to Table B. Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. "FSG" denotes finish subgrade elevation. 239-6E TABLE A - SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM D1556-64 and/or ASTM D2922-78, ASTM D301J, Approximate Water Dry Degree of Test Elevation Content Density Compaction Compaction No. Date of Test Test Location (Feet) (%) (pcf) (%) Curve No. Remarks 343 10/29/86 Building Pad M 18 17 113.2 90 5 3414 10/31/86 Building Pad N 16 15 115.7 92 5 3145 10/31/86 Building Pad N' 16 17 115.2 91 5 346 11/1/86 Building Pad N 17 14 100.1 82 10 Test failed, See #3148 347 11/1/86 Building Pad N 17 - 14 106.3 87 10 Test failed, See #348 3148 11/1/86 Building Pad N 17 13 Al2.3 92 10 Retest of #'s 346&347 349 11/1/86 Building Pad N 17 8 108.8 90 10 350 11/3/86 Building- Pad N 18 9 109.0 90 10 Water Line Trench Backfill 351 11/3/86 Station 22+65 , FSG-1' 14 109.0 .90 10 352 11/3/86 Station 21+90 FSG-1' 11 109.3 90 10 353 11/3/86 Station 19+50 ' FSG-V 11 . 110.2 91 10 354 11/3/86 Station 18+00 FSG-11 . 14 112.0 '.92 10 355 11/3/86 Between Pads M & P FSG 12 . 109.5 90 10 Service 356 11/3/86 Between Pads N & P FSG 12 109.5 90 10 Service Planter Backfill ' , :' .• - 357 11/3 /86 South of Pad D FSG . 11 112.4 .93' 10 Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No." refers to Table B. . Unless. otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. "FSG" denotes finish subgrade elevation. S 239-6E TABLE A - SUMMARY OF FIELD. DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM DI556-64ànd/or ASTM D2922-78, ASTM D3017-7.8) Approximate Water Dry Degree of Test Elevation Content Density. Compaction Compaction No. Date of Test Test Location (Fèèt) (%) (pèf) Curve No. Remarks Building Pad 'A reas 3 11/3/86 Building Pad N 19(FSG) 11 106.6 94 is 359 11/3/86 Building Pad N 19(FSG) 11 . 107.8 95 15 Water Line Trnch Backfill 360 11/4/86 Station 17+00 FSG-1' 15 108.8 90 10 361 11/4/86 Station 16+00 FSG-11 12 108.9 90 . 10 362 11/4/86 Station 15+00 • FSG-11.14 109.0 90 10 Building Pad Areas S. . 363 11/5/86 Building Pad N 19(FSG) 9 109.7 96 15 • 364 11/6/86 Building Pad . • 15 15 112.0 90 11 365 11/6/86 Building Pad A 18(FSG) 13 121.1 95 7 366 11/6/86 Building Pad A 18(FSG) 10 117.3 92 7 367 11/6/86 Building Pad B . • 18(FSG) 12 120.3 94 7 368 11/6/86 Building Pad C 18(FSG) 11 123.4 97 7 369 11/6/86 Building Pad C 18(FSG) 14 120.7 95 5 7 370 11/6/86 Building Pad D . 19(FSG) 10 113.2 91 . 11 371 11/6/86 Building Pad D 19(FSG) 11 118.7 95 11 Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No." refers to Table B. Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. "FSG" denotes finish subgrade elevation. - 239-6E TABLE A - SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST -RESULTS (AS -TM D1556-64 and/or ASTM D2922-78, ASTM --7 Approximate Water Dry Degree of Test . . Elevation content Density Compaction. Compaction No. Date of Test Test Location (Feet) (%) - (pèf) (%) Curve No. Remarks 372 11/6/86 Building Pad D 19(FSG) 10 119.1 93 7 373 11/6/86 . Building Pad b . 19(FSG) 11 118.1 93 7 374 11/6/86 Building Pad E 20(FSG) 7 116.2 91 7 375 11/6/86 Building Pad E -. 20(FSG) 7 112.1 90 11 376 11/6/86 Building Pad F 20(FSG) 10 '119.9 96. 11 377 11/6/86 Building Pad F 20(FSG) 11 111.5 90 11. 378 11/6 /86 Building Pad F 20(FSG) 11 . 116.6 94 11 379 11/6/86 Building Pad F 20(FSG) 12 118.0., 95 11 380 11/6/86 Building Pad C 20(FSG) 11 124.6 98 7 381 11/6/86 Building Pad C - 20(FSG) 12 123.7 97 .7 382 11/6/86 Building Pad H 19(FSG) 12 120.8 95 7 383 11/6 /86 Building Pad H 19(FSG) 12 - 123.2 97 7 384 11/6/86 Building Pad J 19(FSG) 7 112.3 90 11 385 11/6/86 Building Pad J 19(FSG) 7 112.4 90 11 386 11/6/86 - Building Pad J 18 - 15 121.7 95 7 387 11/6/86 Building Pad H 18 15 114.8 92 11 388 11/6/86 Building Pad C 18 16 112.5 90 11 Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No." refers to Table B. Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are, to nearest foot. "FSG" denotes finish subgrade elevation. - 239-6E TABLE A - SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM 6155644 and/or ASTM D2922-78, ASTM D3017-78) Approximate Water Dry Degree of Test Elevation Content Density Compaction Compaction No. Date of Test Test Location (Feet) (%) (pcf) (%) Curve No. Remarks 389 11/6/86 Building Pad F 18 15 111.5 90 11 390 11/6/86 Building Pad E 19 12 112.5 90 11 391 11/7/86 Building Pad D 17 13 114.5 92 11 392 11/7/86 Building Pad C 16 13 114.4 92 11 393 11/7/86 Building Pad B 17 12 112.6 90 11 394 11/7/86 Building Pad B 18(FSG) 9 114.4 92 11 395 11/7/86 Building Pad M. 16 11 115.5 93 - 11 396 11/7/86 Building Pad M 18(FSG) 8 109.9 96 15 397 11/7/86 Building Pad M 18(FSG) 7 109.7 96 15 398 11/7/86 Building Pad Q 16(FSG) 11 119.4 94 7 399 11/7/86 Building Pad Q 16(FSG) 10 124.3 97 7 400 11/7/86 Building Pad R 16(FSG) 10 122.0 96 7 401 11/7/86 Building Pad R 16(FSG) 10 124.2 97 402 11/7/86 Building Pad S - 16(FSG) 11 117.0 93 6 403 11/7/86 Building Pad S 16(FSG) 14- 121.1 96 6 404 11/7/86 Building Pad T 16(FSG) 12 113.9 90 6 405 11/7/86 Building Pad T 16(FSG) 13 126.3 99 7 Notes 1) "Compaction Curve No." refers to Table B. 2) Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. 3) "FSG" denotes finish subgrade elevation. 239-6E S TABLEB LABORATORY COMPACTION TEST RESULTS (ASTM D1557-78) Compaction Maximum Optimum Test Description Source of Dry Density Water Content (Curve) No. of Matérial Méteriál 1 SANDY CLAY (CL), On-site 119.4 13.8 dark grayish brown 2 SANDY CLAY (CL), On-site 120.4 13.5 dark gray 3 SILTY CLAY (CH), On-site 109.4 17.1 dark gray 14 SILTY-SANDY CLAY On-site 118.5 14.0 (CL), gray S.. 5 CLAYEY SAND (SC), On-site 126.0 10.0 grayish brown 6 CLAYEY SAND (SC), On-site 126.0 10.0 light yellowish brown 7 CLAYEY SAND (SC), On-site 127.5 9.5 grayish brown 8 SILTY SAND (SM), 0n-site 121.0 12.4 yellowish brown S 9 . CLAYEY SILT-CLAYEY On-site 124.7 10.5 SAND (ML-SC), gray 10 CLAYEY SAND (SC), On-site 121.5 . 11.7 brown ; 11 CLAYEY SAND (SC), On-site 124.5 10.5 tan. S 12 WELL çRADED GRAVEL On-site 134.8 7.7 (GW), brown 13 SANDY CLAY-CLAYEY On-site 123.5 10.7 SAND (CL-SC), S grayish brown S • S 114 WELL GRADED GRAVEL Import 140.0 6.1 (GW), gray, Class 2 . Aggregate' Base S 15 SILTY SAND (SM), Import 114.0 14.8 yellowish brown 239-6E TABLE C RESULTS OF EXPANSION TESTS Water Content Water Content Sample Initial Before After Surcharge Test No. & Depth Dry Density Saturation Saturation Pressure Swell Location (Feet) (pcf) (%) (%) (psf) (%) 10. Pad K-L FSG 120.7 2.1 22.1 11414 1.5 11 Pad M FSG 113.5 14.1 . 25.3 144 5.8 12 Pad Q FSG 131.0 2.7 16.0 144 3.7 13 Pad R FSG 133.9 6.6 21.8 144 14.6 114 Pad S FSG 128.9 5.8 21.9 144 2.5- 15 Pad FSG 131.3 5.7 17.9 . 144 2.4 TABLE D RESULTS OF U.B.C. EXPANSION INDEX TESTS Molding Initial Sample Moisture Dry Depth . . Content Density Expansion Location (Feet) Soil Type (%) (pcf) Index Pad M FSG SILTY SAND 9.3 . 110.2 . 2 (SM) .. I- ROBERT. PRATER ASSOCIATES Robert R. Proter, C.E. 1942-1980 Consulting Soil. Foundation & Geological Engineers . Wm. David Hespeler, C.E. February 24, 1986 . . - 239-6D, 7025 - 4. Hughes Investments -. . 2 Corporate Plaza, Suite 250 Newport Beach, California 92660 AttentIon Mr. Tom Purcell Re: Update Report - North 'County Plaza Carlsbad Tract 85-2 Carlsbad, California Gentlemen: In accordance with your request we have prepared this update report for the site describing our previous work at the site, existing site conditions, and a general description of work'remaining from a geotechnicai standpoint to . complete the site grading. Ours evaluation and conclusions are based on the. presently proposed development of one and two-story buildings at the locations, and finish floor elevations shown on the grading plans prepared by George S. Nolte and Associates dated October 21, 1985. We originally performed a'prellmlnary geotechnical Investigation for the entire North County Plaza site the results of which were presented in our report dated April 30, 1982. In that report we addressed the general site conditions and ' provided preliminary recommendations for earthwork and foundations. in - 'geñeral, we concluded that with the exception of two areas Identified adjacent to Mat-ron Road and Jefferson Street, tIe site should be suitable for the - support of one and two-story buildings, with finish floor elevations not - exceeding +19, on conventional footing foundations bearing on recompacted fill mats. The areas noted along Marron Road and Jefferson Street (present Building Pads P, Q, R, S. and T) would require surcharging (pre-loading) In addition to recompaction of fill mats. . • During the period of September 30 through November 17, 1982, we provided earth- work observation and testing services for an initial phase of site grading. The purpose of this grading was to install some drainage facilities and prepare the site to receive Imported fill material from the Buena Vista Lagoon. The results of our work were presented In a report dated November 30; .1982. Subse- quent to this grading the site was covered with material from the lagoon In mid 1983. The lagoon material was end-dumped and leveled off with an average thickness of about 3 feet. -• - 10505 Roselle Street, Son Diego, California 92121 (619) 453-5605 February 24, 1986 239-613, 7025 Page 2 We performed a foundation investigation for the building sites now designated P through T, the results of which were presented in our report titled "Foundation Investigation, North County Plaza, Buildings 1 through 5, Carlsbad, California," dated August 16, 1983. These are the building sites which were within the areas designated as requiring surcharging In our original 1982 report. In this report we provided detailed recommendations for earthwork (Including surcharging) and foundations for these building sites. During the period of October 3 through November 8, 1983, we provided earthwork observation and testing services in connection with the removal and recompac- tion of fill mats and surcharging for the building pads now designated P through T. The results of this work were presented in our report dated November 28, 1983. Settlement monuments were Installed on the pads during this work and monitored until late 1985. During October and November 1985 we provided earthwork observation and testing services in connection with the removal of the surcharge fill on the building pad currently designated "P" and placing about 1/2 foot of non-expansive compacted fill soil to bring the pad to about elevation +18.5. The surcharge soils were placed in future pavement areas and not compacted at that time due to their wet condition. As indicated In our report dated November 19, 1985, it is our opinion that this pad is now suitable for construction of the proposed building. As of this date the following work remains to be completed at the site prior to the construction of buildings, pavements, and other improvements as presently planned. Detailed recommendations for the remaining work were presented in our April 30, 1982, report and remain applicable to the site development. Building Pads Q through T Removal of the surcharge fills and the placement of 1/2 to 1 foot of compacted, non-expansive, fill soil to attain the finish pad subgrade. Building Pads A through H and J through N Removal of the Import fill soil from the Buena Vista Lagoon and the removal and recompaction of the underlying older fill. This work will probably require mining of some of the older existing fill in non-building areas to bring the building pads to the planned subgrade elevations. The imported soil from the lagoon should only be re-used in non-building areas. The building finish floor elevations in these areas which exceed the originally recommended elevation of +19, were approved by us from a foundation standpoint because of past loading history in the various areas. All Non-Building Areas The imported fill soil from Buena Vista Lagoon has not been compacted to the recommended 90 percent as of this date. All of these materials should be dryed to a water content that will allow compaction and removed and recompacted in all non-building areas. February 214, 1986 239-613, 7025 Page 3 For the project completed in accordance with our recommendations, we estimate that total settlements in any of the building areas will not exceed about 4 Inches over a period of about 20 years. Of this amount we estimate that .1-1/2 Inches will occur. throughout the entire site independent of loading conditions (including non-building areas). Although this amount of settlement is,rela- tively large for most sites, it is not unusual for similar sites with deep deposits of compressible .clay. The threshold for architectural damage for the' types of construction proposed are generally considered to be about 1/14-inch of post-construction differential settlement in 20 feet horiióntally. This corresponds to-an angular distortion of 0.001 radians. In our opinion, the anticipated angular distortion should be les than this amount. Our services consist of professional opinions and recommendations made in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices. This warranty is in lieu of all other warranties either express or - - . implied. . If you have any questions, please call. Very truly yours, . S ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES .. S.-- Wm D. Hespeler, E No. 26,222 * WDH:ls . . Copies: Addressee (2) SGPA Planning & Architecture, Attn: Mr. Geoff Reeslund (2) ' George S. Nolte & Associates, Attn: Mr. Jim Hettinger (3) w/enclosures * ' S I , ROBERT -PRATER ASSOCIATES Robert R. Prater, C.E. 19424980 . Consulting Soil, Foundation & Geological Engineers ', Wm. David Hespeler, C.E. I - '• ',, -r ' November 30, 1982 '• ". ' - 239-613, '!I878 , Hughes Investments '. S Two Corporate Plaza, Suite 250 ' I Newport Beach, California 92660' ' - Attentions Messrs. Bill Hughes and Tom' Purcell Re: Earthwork Observation and Testing Services North County Plaza State Highway, 78 and Marron Road I Carlsbad-Oceanside, California * Gentlemen: In accordance with your request we are providing earthwork observation and testing services in connection with the subject project. We previously per- formed a preliminary geotechnical Investigation for the project the results of which were presented 'In our report titled "Preliminary Geotechnical Investiga- tion, North County Plaza, Carlsbad-Oceanside,. California," dated April 30, 1982. I During the period of September 30 'through November 1' 1982, our representa- tives were present at the site to observe the earthwork operations and to I provide field density testing services for the initial phase of the grading operations. • The results of the field'density and laboratory compaction tests are presented in the attached tables 'A . and B, respectively. The approximate I locations of the field density tests are shown on the attached Site Plans,4 ' Figures 1,'2, and 3. In addition, twenty settlement monuments were installed at the locations designated on the plans. The devices are being monitored to aid in further evaluating the settlement characteristics of the deep compress- ible soil deposits underlying the' site. Based on our observations and the attached test results) it is.our opinion that . the following, items of work were satisfactorily completed in accordance with the recommendations of the geotechnical investigation report: , The initial mass grading operations as' referenced by Test Nos. 1-25, . 39-43, 46-47, 49, and 51-54. - S Storm drain trench and. structure backfills as referenceJ by Test Nos. 26-38, 44-45, 48, 50, and 55-79. , S I 10505 Roselle Street, San Diego, California 92121 (619) 453-5605 ' S I ' . '. •,'-,':, - 4 November 30, 1982 239-613, 4878 I Page I Our services consist of professional opinions and recommendations made in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices. This warranty is in lieu of all other warranties either express or I implied. If you have any questions, please call. I Very truly yours, ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES I J1 n A. LaBar, RCE No. 22,385 JLB:Is • 0 Attachments I Copies: Addressee (3) SGPA Planning & Architecture, Attn: Messrs. Ron Roberts and Geoff Reeslund (1) Collins General Contractors, Attn: Mr. Mickey Carhart (1) I I, I: I I U . • • 0 • •.:. . I I 1 H I I I I I I ii I I ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES Consulting Soil. Foundation Geological engineers SITE PLAN NORTH COUNTY PLAZA Carlsbad, California - PROJECT NO. DATE Figure 2 -; 239-613 lNovember 1982 Base: A grading plan for North County Plaza by George S. Nolte & Associates, Sheet 1 of 2, dated 7 /28/82. 4W. itJ - ------SF __- - y \AL _---CAF SE I: L 1 co$ •• . 4---------:.: ' - I/I 8Ji - CF?E AT /1 r AV C9 cirf /* 312400 le XrAIL 2n a / _____ £ 6 4. ---- " '•'. ' fl1- -: . . •- \. 'H. 4.. .j I. I LEGEND ' . . Approximate Scale (Feet) P. 1 1 is Indicates approximate location . . 0. 50 100 200 of field density test. T -V. II -P 25* i " 5• I C \ \ \ \\\ \4\0 '\ '•. 521 U4 Approximate Scale (Feet) I t 050 100 200- VU I LEGEND 13 • Indicates approximateIocation of field-density test. I. 1 Base: A grading plan for North County Plaza by George S. Nolte & Associates, Sheet 2 of 2, dated 7/28/82. I' Ft Vt SITEPLAN ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES NORTH COUNTY PLAZA Consulsing Soil..Foundotion & Geologicol Engineers Carlsbad, California PROJECT NO. DATE . 239-6B November .1982 Figure 3 - - .-.------- - V . - V. V - - -- - - - a' - - - - - - - - - - - ' 239-6B TABLE' A -SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM D1556-64 and/or ASTM D2922-78, ASTM D3017-78) Approximate Water Dry Degree of Test Elevation Content Density Compaction Compaction No. Date of Test Test Location (Feet) (%) (pcf) (%) Curve No. Remarks • Mass Grading , ' - • 1 10/6/82 South Side - Northwest Corner 15 10 109.5 90 3 S 2 10/6/82 South Side - Northwest Corner 15 4 10 108.9 90 3 3 10/6/82 South Side - Center 15 9 111.5 92 3 14 10/6/82 South Side - E. of Marron Rd. 12 11 115.0 90 2 5 1016/82 South Side - E. of Marron Rd. 12 11 115.6 91 2 6 10/7/82 South Side - Channel 13 11 108.7 90 3 7 10/7/82 South Side - Channel 12 8 112.3 93 3 8 10/7/82 South Side - channel 12 9 113.5 90 1 9 10/8/82 South Side - Channel 14 10 108.6 90 3 10 10/8/82 South Side - Channel 111 10.110.1" 110 1 91 3 11 10/8/82 South Side - Channel , 15 ' 12 104.0 86 3 Test failed, see #12 12 10/8/82 South Side - Channel 15 10 109.4 90 3 Retest of #11 13 10/8/82 South Side - E. of Marron Rd. 1. 11 109.0 90 3 14. 10/8/82 Soüth Side - E. of Marron Rd. 14 13 111.5 92 3 15 10/8/82 South Side - E. of Marron Rd. 14 8 109.4 90 3 16 10/8/82 South Side - Center 15 - . 7. 110.3 91 - 3 ' Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No." refers to Table B. ' S 2) Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -' - - 239-6B TABLE A - SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM D1556-64 and/or ASTM D2922-78, ASTM D3017-78) Approximate Water Dry Degree of Test - Elevation Content Density Compaction Compaction No. Date of Test Test Location (Feet) (%) (pcf) (%) ' Curve No. Remarks 17 10/8/82 South Side - Center 16 8 109.14 90 3 ' 18 10/8/82 South Side - Center 15 8 108.7 90 3 19 10/12/82 South Side - Channel '16 6 109.3 , 90 3 20 10/12 /82 South Side - Channel 16 8 109.4 90 3 21 10/12 /82 South Side - Channel 15 7 108.7 90 3 22 10/12/82 South Side- Channel 15 8 109.3 90 3 23 10/12 /82 South Side - E. of, Marron Rd. 16 12 109.7 90 3 24 10/12/82 South Side - E. of Marron Rd. 16 11 110.9 91 3 25 • 10/12/82 South Side - E. of Marron Rd. 16 12 110.1 91 3 Storm Drain Trench Backfill ' • 26 10/15/82 Twin 48" C.S.P. - Sta. 1+50 10 15 104.7 96 4 27'.• '- .10/15 /82 Twin 48" C.S.P.' - Sta. 1+80 8 16 104.4 96 4 • . 28 - 10/18/82 - 42" C.S.P. - Station 0+85 ;8 ' 15 101.5 ' 93 4 29 10/18 /82 42" CS.P. - Station 3+00 ' 7 ' • 18 , 100.6 92 4 30 •: 10/18/82 42" C.S.P. - Station 1+60 '10 ' 20 102.2 , 94' 3 Test failed, see'#33 31 10/18/82 Twin-48" C.S.P. - Sta. 0+70 13 13 - 110.7. 88 1 Test failed, see #314 32 10/18/82 Twin L48" C.S.P. - Sta. 2+30 12 - 12 113.4 90 1 • Notes: 1) "Compaction ,Curve No." refers to Table 'B. 2) Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to 'nearest 'foot. , - —. - - - - - --- - 239-613 TABLE A - SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM -D1556-64 and/or ASTM D2922-78, ASTM D3017-78) Approximate Water Dry Degree of Test Elevation Content Density Compaction Compaction No. Date of Test Test Location (Feet) (%) (pcf) (%) Curve No. Remarks - 33 10/18/82 42" C.S.P. - Station 1+60 10 14 112.1 92 3 Retest of #30 34 10/18/82 Twin £48" C.S.P. - Sta. 0+70 13 13 113.8 90 1 Retest of #31 35 10/19/82 Twin 48" C.S.P. - Sta. 2+80 14 9. 114.9 91 1 Sand Cone 36 10/19/82 42" C.S.P. - Station 3+20 12 9 113.3 90 1 Sand Cone 37 10/19/82 Twin 48" C.S.P. - Sta. 0+40 14 9 111.8 92 3 Sand Cone 38 10/19/82 42" C.SP. - Station 0+60 114 10 114.3 91 1 - Mass Grading - - 39 10/19/82 South Slope of North Side 13 8 108.7 90 3 40 10/19/82 South Slope of North Side 13 8 109.4 90 3 41 10/19/82 South Slope of North'Side 15 9 110.0 91 3 42 - .10/19/82 South Slope of North Side 15 9 108.8 90 3 S 43 10/19/82 South Slope of North Side 15 9 109.1 90 3 - Storm Drain Trench Backfill 44 10/20/82 42" C.S.P. - Station 1+20 15 9 114.9 91 1 45 10/20/82 42" C.S.R. - Station 2+30 .15 9 116.4 92 1 - Mass Grading - S 46 10/20/82 South Slope of North Side- 14 8 - 104.6 86 3 Slope Face Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No." refers toTbIe B. 2) Unless-otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 239-6B TABLE A - SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM D1556-64 and/or ASTM D2922-78, ASTM D3017-78) Approximate Water Dry Degree' of Test '.. Elevation Content Density Compaction Compaction No. Date of Test Test Location (Feet) (%) (pcf) (%) Curve No. Remarks 47 10/20/82 South Slope of North Side 14 8 , 103.3 85 3 Slope Face Storm Drain Trench Backfill 48 . , 10/20/82 Twin 48" C.S.P. - Sta. 1+70 FSG 9 115.0 91 1 Sand Cone Mass Grading 49 10/20/82 North Side - Center 18 (FSG) 9 113.5 , 90 1 Sand' Cone Storm Drain Trench ,Backfill 50 10/20/82 42" C.S.P. - Station 1+90 FSG 9 113.3 '90 1 . Sand 'Cone Mass Grading 51 10/20/82 South Side - Center , 17 (FSG) 11 108.7 90 3 52 10/20/82 South Side - E. of Marron -Rd. 18 (FSG) 12 110.6 91 3 53 10/20/82 South Side - Center ' 16 (FSG) 11 111.0 92 3 54 10/20/82 South Side - Northeast Corner 16 (FSG) 12 109.0 90 3 Storm Drain Trench Backfill 55 10/21/82 - 30" C.S.P. - Station 6+25 ' FSG-6' 12 . - 114.5 . 90 2 56 10/21/82 30" C.S.P. - Station 4+50 FSG-4' 9 109.2 90 ' - 3 57 10/21/82 24" C.S.P; - Station 2+75- FSG-2' , 12 . 109.5 90 3 58 - 10/21/82 18" C.S.P.- Station 0+50, . FSG 9 108.8 90 - 0 Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No. refers to Table B. Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. "FSG" denotes finish subgrade elevation. ' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 239-6B - I TABLE A -SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM D1556-64 and/or ASTM D2922-78, ASTM D3017-78) Approximate Water Dry Degree of Test ' Elevation Content Density Compaction Compaction No. of Test ,Date Test Location (Feet) (%) (pcf) (%) Curve No. Remarks - 59 10/21/82 18" C.S.P. - Station 2+25 FSG-1' 11 109.6 90 3 60 10/21/82 24" C.S.P.- Station 0+75 FSG 9 110.3 91 3 61 10/21/82 24" C.S.P. - Station 2+25 FSG 10 109.2 90 3 62 10/21/82 30" C.S.P - Station 4+00 FSG-2' 11 109 4 90 3 63 10/21/82 30" C.S.P. -Station 5+50 FSG-4' 11 114.8 90 2 64 10/22/82 .30" C.S.P: - Station 6+50 FSG-2' 13 110.4 91 3 65 10/22/82 30" C.S.P. - Station 4+75 FSG A 11 111.3 92 3 66 10/25/82 36" C.S.P. - Station 7+50 FSG-5' 13 114.9 90 2 67 10/25/82 36" C.S.P. - Station 8+25 FSG-3' 10 114.3 90 2 68 10/25/82 36" C.S.P. Station 8+50 FSG-1' 12 115.5 91 2 69 10/26/82 Type C Catch Basin - 30" FSG-2' 10 108.9 90 3 and 24" C.S.P. 70 10/26/82 Type G Catch Basin - 30" FSG 11 110.2 91 3 and 24" C.S.P. 71 10/26/82 Type A Clean Out Box'-'4210 FSG-6' 7 108.8 90 3 C.S.P - 72 10/26/82 Type A Clean Out Box - 42" FSG-4' 10 113.5 ' 90 - 1' C.S.P. -- 73 10/26/82 Twin 148" Clean Out Box FSG-5' 10 113.1 90 1 Notes 1) "Compaction Curve No." refers to Table B. 17 Unless otherwise noted elevations shown. are to, nearest foot. - - "FSG" denotes finish subgrade elevation. . -. - - - - - - - - -- - - - .— - - - - - 239-6B TABLE A - SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM D1556-64 and/or ASTM D2922-78, ASTM D3017-78) Approximate Water Dry Degree of Test Elevation Content Density Compaction Compaction No. Date of Test Test Location -. (Feet) (%) '(pcf) (%) Curve No. Remarks 714 10/27/82. Type 'A Clean Out Box - 42" FSG-2' 8 113.9 90 1 Sand Cone C.S.P. 75 10/27/82 Type A Clean Out Box - 42" FSG 11 113.0 90 1 C.S.P. 76 10/27/82 Twin 143" Clean Out Box FSG-3' 9 114.9 91 1 77 10/27/82 Twin 48" CleanOut Box FSG-1' 9 113.8 90 1 Sand Cone 78 11/15/82 Type "G Catch Basin - 3611- FSG-3' 17 99.7 78 2 Test failed, see #79 and 30" C.S.P. - - 79 11/17/82 Type G Catch Basin -'36'11 FSG-3' 13 114.2 90 2 Retest of #78 and 30" C.S.P. - - Notes 1) "Compaction 4- Curve No." refers to Table B. - Unless otherwise noted elevations Shown are to nearest foot. "FSG" denotes finish subgrade elevation. 2396B U - TABLE LABORATORY COMPACTION TEST RESULTS (ASTM D1557-78) Compaction Maximum Optimum Test Description Source of Dry Density Water Content I (Curve) No. of Material Material (pcf) (%) 1 CLAYEY SAND (SC), On-site 126.0 10.0 I . grayish brown . 2 CLAYEY SAND (SC), On-site 127.5 9.5 grayish brown - .1 3 SILTY SAND (SM), On-site 121.3 8.6 grayish brown I 4 SILTY SAND.(SM), Import 109.0 114.3 gray . ..- I U U * U I U . .. U . .:•- I U I I I.. 1* I U i I PRELIMINARY • GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR 1 NORTH COUNTY PLAZA CARLSBAD-OCEANSIDE, CALIFORNIA APRIL 1982 I,. '• I I S II I S I I I S. . . I t - ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES Robert R. Prater, C.E. 1942-1980 Consulting Soil. Foundation & Geological Engineers Wm. David I-lespeler, C.E. I April 30, 1982 239-6, 4565 I, H Hughes Investments do SGPA Planning & Architecture - P. 0. Box 33326 San Diego, California 92103 1 Attention: - Messrs. Ron Roberts and Geoff Reeslund Re: Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation North County Plaza Carlsbad-Oceanside, California Gentlemen: - In accordance with your request we have performed a preliminary .geotechnical investigation for the subject project. The accompanying report presents the results of our field investigation and engineering analysis. The soil and foundation conditions are discussed and preliminary recommendations for the soil and foundation engineering aspects of the project are presentd. If you have any questions concerning our findings, please call. I Very truly yours, - ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES Hi Wm. D. Hespe er, RCE No. 6,222 1 WDH:ls - - - Copies: -Addressee (16) I I • - - 10505 Roselle Stret, San Diego, California 92121 (619) 453-5605 I - PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION I U For I .. NORTH COUNTY PLAZA Carlsbad-Oceanside, California I I. V To V •V V V HUGHES INVESTMENTS do SGPA Planning & Architecture V P. 0. Box 33326 San Diego, California V * I I April 1982 I: V V I a 1 I I TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. I Letter of Transmittal Title Page 1 of Contents Table INTRODUCTION 1 . SCOPE SITE CONDITIONS 1 Site History Surface 2 C. Subsurface 3 I D. Seismic Considerations - - 3 - E. Groundwater 4 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS - 4 A.- Preliminary Earthwork Recommendations 4 1. Preparation for Filling 4 2. Fill Adjacent to Existing Sewer - 5 3. Installation of Settlement -Monuments 5 - 4. Dredge Fill Materials - - 5 - 5. Compaction - - 5 I B. Foundations - 6 - 1. -One and Two-Story Structures 6 - 2. Driven Pile Foundations - - 7 3. Drainage Pipes - 8 C. Pavements - - - 8 1 Figure 1 - Site Plan - APPENDIX-A - FIELD INVESTIGATION A-1 - Figure A-i - Key -to Exploratory Boring Logs • - - - I - Exploratory Boring Logs 1 through 8 - - - BIBLIOGRAPHY - - I -. - I II I I 4 Hi Hi - • -. - - - I Ll PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR NORTH COUNTY PLAZA CARLSBAD-OCEANSIDE, CALIFORNIA INTRODUCTION In this report we present the results of our preliminary geotechnical investi- gation for the subject site loated southeast of the intersection of State Highway 78 and Marron Road. ' The northern portion of the site (about 8 acres) Is located in the City of Oceanside and the southern portion of, the site (about 16 acres) is located in the City of Carlsbad. The purpose of this investiga- tion was to develop general Information regarding foundation, conditions at the site for use in the preliminary planning stages of the project. It is our understanding most of the site will probably be developed in one and' two-story commercial /office buildings.. However, two office buildings, five to, six stories high, may also be constructed. It is our understanding that building pads will be established at a minimum elevation of +19, requiring up to 4 feet of fill In most portions of the site. Dredged material from the Buena Vista Lagoon may be spread on the site and dried for use as fill in non-building areas. Drainage pipes will be placed in the two north-south trending channels in the northern portion of the site and the channels will be backfilled. In addition, the north-south trending channel along the east boundary of the southern portion of the site will be backfilled. SCOPE The scope of work performed for this Investigation Included a review of avail- able reports regarding the soil and geologic conditions at thesite, a review of reports regarding the history of previous fill placement, a limited sUbsur-. face exploration program, engineering analysis of previous settlement and field data, and the preparation of this report. The data obtained and the analyses performed were for the purpose of providing preliminary design and construction criteria related to the geotechnical engineering aspects of the proposed devel- opment. SITE CONDITIONS A. Site History ' The site was originally overgrown with tule bulrushes. Grading under the observation of LeRoy Crandall and Associates began in January 1968 when the surcharge fills from the Phase I development of the existing Plaza Camino Real .1 I I F, I I 239-6 Page 2 shopping center were removed and placed on the central portion of the site south of the main channel. The bulrushes were burned with diesel fuel and a platform fill was pushed out over the wet area. From an initial elevation of approximately +5 this portion of the site was raised to elevations ranging between +15 and +20. Sometime prior to this filling three settlement markers (Nos. 7, 8, and 9) were placed. Filling resumed in August 1968 and the result- ing finish elevations varied from +17 to +21. The settlement markers were read periodically from January 1968 until January 1972. Total recorded settlements ranged from approximately 23 to 25 inches due to the weight of about iLl to 15 feet of fill. Filling on the remaining portions of the site (the area north of the main channel, an area just south of the main channel and extending about 250 feet east of Marron Road, and an area at the southeast corner of the site which extends about 200 feet north of Marron Road) began in May 1972 under the obser- vation of Woodward-Gizienski & Associates. This filling operation also included the placement of fill (and surcharge fill) along the alignment of Marron Road and at the intersection with Jefferson Street. Woodward-Gizienski & Associates monitored twenty-one settlement markers (15 of which were on site) and measured settlements up to about 16 inches under 16 feet of fill. Our research has not revealed any documentation as to when the existing channels were constructed or any documentation regarding the placement of fill on the site since 1972. However, based on our review it appears that the southern channel was not excavated until about 1978. Our comparison of the elevations and topographic features depicted on an A.L.T.A. Survey based .on aerial photo- graphy dated August 1979 and a Boundary and Topographic Survey based on aerial photography dated January 25, 1982, indicates that in general the site eleva- tions have not changed significantly except for the southeast corner of the site which in 1979 was stockpiled with soil up to el. +42 and Area A indicated on the Site Plan, Figure 1, which had an elevation as low as +12 at that time. When and where the stockpile was disposed of and the length of time it was present are not known. A bibliography of materials reviewed regarding the site history is included following Appendix A. B. Surface The site of the proposed development is presently vacant and irregular in shape with a plan area of approximately 24 acres. The Buena Vista Creek, flowing to the west, divides the site into north and south parcels. Both north and south portions of the site are relatively flat with ground surface elevations ranging from approximately el. +15 to el. +20. In general, the ground surface slopes gently towards the Buena Vista Creek. The northern portion of the site consists of approximately 8 acres, divided by two open, unlined drainage channels which begin at the northern boundary of the site. Each channel carries storm runoff to the Buena Vista Creek from culverts passing beneath State Highway 78. A relatively large pile of dumped fill is present along the western edge of the easternmost drainage channel. The remaining 16 acres are located south of the Buena Vista Creek. An unlined drainage channel is present in the northeast portion of this parcel. The channel flows to the northwest and carries runoff from the paved parking east of the site. A man-made closed basin, with a plan area of roughly 40,000 square 239-6 Page 3 feet, is present In the southwest, adjacent to Marron Road (Area B on site plan). Surface vegetation, both north and south of the creek, ranges from essentially nil areas to areas of dense short grass and weeds. In addition, dense growths of weeds and bushes are present in some channel locations and in the ponded, basin area adjacent to Marron Road. At the time of this investigation several locations at the site were flooded with shallow standing water from recent rainfall. C. Subsurface The preliminary subsurface exploration was performed using a truck-mounted, continuous-flight auger to investigate and sample the subsurface soils. Eight exploratory borings were drilled during the period of February 5 to March 5, 1982, to a maximum depth of 132 feet at the approximate locations shown on the Site Plan, Figure 1. Logs of the borings and details regarding the field Investigation are presented in Appendix A. The subsurface soils encountered in the borings consisted in general of about 16 feet of compacted fill underlain In turn by; natural soft silty clay, medium dense silty and clayey sands, and formational sandstones and claystones to the depths explored. The soft silty clay varied in overall thickness from about 20 to 70 feet with thin to thick (up to 10 feet) interbedded layers of silty and clayey sands. The medium dense silty and clayey sands are considered to be ancient alluvial soils and vary in overall thickness from 4 to 70 feet. The formational sandstones and claystones were encountered at depths ranging between 55-1/2 and 131 feet. The boring logs and related Information depict subsurface conditions only at the specific locations shown on the site plan and on the particular dates designated on the logs. Subsurface conditions at other locations may differ from conditions occurring at these boring locations. Also, the passage of time may result in changes in the subsurface conditions due to environmental changes. - D. Seismic Considerations I The San Diego area Is considered by geologists and seismologists to have a low to moderate seismic rating. Based on our review of some available published Information Including the County of San Diego Faults and Epicenters Map, there I are no active or potentially active faults known to pass through the site. The prominent fault zones generally considered to have the most potential for earthquake damage in the vicinity of the site are the active Elsinore and San Jacinto Fault Zones located approximately 23 and 43 miles northeast of the I site, respectively. The postulated off-shore extension of the Rose Canyon Fault Zone is located approximately 6 miles southwest of the site. No earth- quake epicenter clusters are associated with this fault system and the Rose I Canyon Fault Set is not classified as active under current accepted criteria. Although research on earthquake prediction has greatly Increased in recent I years, seismologists have not yet reached the point where they can predict when and where an earthquake will occur. Nevertheless, on the basis of current technology, It Is reasonable to assume that the proposed buildings will be I i I 239-6 Page 4 I subjected to at least one moderate earthquake during their design life. During such an earthquake, the danger from fault offset through the site is remote, but relatively strong ground shaking is likely to occur. I Strong ground shaking not only can cause structures to shake, but it also has the potential for including other phenomena that can indirectly cause substan- tial ground movements resulting in damage to structures. These phenomena include seismically induced waves such as tsunamis and seiches, inundation due to dam or embankment failure, landsliding, lateral spreading, differential compaction, and ground cracking. Another potential hazard which can result from strong earthquake ground shaking Is soil liquefaction. Based on our preliminary analysis, some of the natural sandy soils underlying the site are potentially liquefiable during the maximum anticipated probable earthquake on the Elsinore Fault Zone. However, in light of the fact that the potentially liquefiable sands are at least 30 feet below the finish site grades, it is our opinion that liquefaction could result in severe architectural damage but the possibility of structural failure is remote. E. Groundwater Free groundwater was encountered in all the exploratory borings at the time of drilling at depths of approximately 14 to 16 feet; the exact depth to a stabi- lized groundwater level was not established. It must be noted, however, that fluctuations in the level of groundwater may occur due to variations in the sustained level of water In the Buena Vista Creek, ground surface topography, subsurface stratification, rainfall, and other possible factors which may not have been evident at the time of our field investigation. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS From a soil and foundation engineering standpoint, it is our opinion that the site Is in general suitable for the proposed construction of one to six-story buildings. The primary features of concern at the site are 1) the presence of underlying deep deposits of compressible lagoon sediments which are subject to relatively large long term settlements due to increased fill and/or building loads, and 2) the complex nature and history of previous site loading which has resulted from earthwork operations dating back to 1968. Earthwork recommenda- tions for preparing the site to receive proposed dredge fill material and treatment of the dredge fill material are presented in the following section. In addition, our preliminary evaluation and recommendations regarding building siting and foundation types are also presented. A Preliminary Earthwork Recommendations 1. Preparation for Filling After the site has been stripped of vegetation and the channels and basin have been cleared of vegetation, debris, and unsuitable material, the exposed subgrade soils in those areas to receive fill should be scarified to a depth of 8 inches, moisture conditioned, and compacted to the requirements for structural fill. Any dumped fill soils or loose surface soils should be completely removed down to well compacted soil and replaced as compacted structural fill. The depth and areal extent of any required removal should be determined by the soil 239-6 Page 5 engineer's representative at the time of construction based on an examination of the soil exposed. in addition, prior to filling with dredge material we recommend that the site be surface graded to create a flat planar surface and the resulting subgrade be compacted with rubber tired equipment to minimize infiltration of water from the dredge materials. Fill Adjacent to Existing Sewer No fill, including channel backfill, should be placed within 30 feet of the existing sewer line along the south edge of Buena Vista Creek during the initial filling operations. Depending on settlements observed adjacent to this area, it may be possible to place fill within those limits at a later date. Installation of Settlement Monuments To assure that settlements are occurring at the rates estimated and to provide additional information on settlement characteristics of different portions of, t' the site, it is essential that settlement measuring devices such as settlement plates be Installed within the existing fills and monitored on a regular basis. These devices should be Installed under the direction of the soil engineer prior to placement of any fill (including the proposed dredge fill) and should be read once immediately after installation, once a week during placement of fill and the subsequent month, and once a month thereafter. Dredge Fill Materials It is our understanding that approximately 85,000 cubic yards of dredge material from the Buena Vista Lagoon may be spread on the site for use as fill in non- building areas. Based on our review of a report prepared for the California Department of Fish and Game, dated January 1982, the lagoon sediments consist of silty sands and silty clays. According to the report the silty sands had water contents that ranged between 10 and 20 percent and the clays between 50 and 110 percent; completely dry silty clay samples had a shrinkage factor of 46 percent. These test results indicate that 1) in general the dredged material will be of low strength characteristics and will be a poor pavement subgrade soil s 2) an extensive period of time will be necessary to dry the more clayey soils so they can be properly compacted, and 3) after drying and compaction the more clayey soils will occupy only 55 to 65 percent of their original volume. With regard to drying back of the dredge material to allow for proper compac- tion, It is our opinion that the material should be placed in lifts no greater than approximately 1-1/2' feet before drying and compacting. Based on coastal evapotranspiration rates and with continuous mixing we estimate that 1-1/2 feet of dredge material could be dried back to near optimum moisture contents in about one month during the months of August through October. An alternative to drying back the dredge material by mixing would be to lime treat the dredge material. Lime treatment could reduce the dry back time to several weeks. In addition, the lime treated soils would possess much better pavement subgrade qualities. 5. Compaction All fill should be compacted to a minimum degree of compaction of 90 percent based upon ASTM Test Designation D 1557-78. Fill material should be spread and I I I 239-6 Page 6 I compacted in uniform horizontal lifts. Before compaction begins, the fill should be brought to a water content that will permit proper compaction by either: 1) aerating and/or lime treating the fill If It is too wet, or 2) I moistening the fill with water if it is too dry. Each lift should be thoroughly mixed before compaction to ensure a uniform distribution of moisture. I B. Foundations 1. One and Two-Story Structures Based on our review and analysis of the previous site history including settle- ment monument data by Crandall and Woodward-Gizienski, it Is our opinion that relatively light one and two-story structures (column loads not exceeding 150 kips) with finish floor elevations not exceeding +19 may in general be supported on conventional footing foundations In most portions of the site. Due to reported marginal compaction of some of the previous compacted fill at the site It will be necessary to support these structures on mats of properly recompacted fill. With the exception of the areas labeled A and B on the site plan, we estimate that the grade and building conditions described in the previous paragraph would result In long-term settlements of up to 5 inches over a period of 20 years. If the site Is raised to approximately elevation +18 for a period of one year (as a result of dredge filling operations) we estimate that approxi- mately one inch of settlement would occur in that time period. Of the remaining 4 inches approximately 1-1/2 inches would occur throughout the site independent of loading conditions. Based on the preceding, It Is our opinion that differential settlements for proposed one and two-story buildings supported on footing foundations and a recompacted fill mat with finish floor elevations no higher than +19 should be within tolerable limits for most of the site (with the exceptions noted previ- ously). The recompacted fill mat beneath buildings should extend down to approximately elevation +8. The prism of recompacted fill beneath buildings should extend a minimum of 10 feet beyond the perimeter limits of the buildings at the base of the required excavations. Within the constraints outlined above, we recommend that proposed one and two-story buildings be supported on conventional, Individual-spread and/or continuous footing foundations bearing on well-compacted fill material. All footings should be founded at least 18 inches below the lowest adjacent finished grade. Footings located adjacent to the tops of slopes should be extended sufficiently deep so as to provide at least 8 feet of horizontal cover or 1-1/2 times the width of the footing, whichever is greater, between the slope face and outside edge of the footing at the footing bearing level. Footings located adjacent to utility trenches should have their bearing surfaces situated below an imaginary 1-1/2 to 1 plane projected upward from the bottom edge of the adjacent utility trench. t2,7 co nded depths footings may be designed for allowable bearing pres- 0 unds per square foot (psf) for combined dead and live loads p5 r all loads, including wind or seismic. The footings should, h have a minimum width of 12 inches. All continuous footings should c p and bottom reinforcement to provide structural continuity and to I I. i I I I i I I I i i 239-6 Page 7 permit spanning of local irregularities. In order to assure t h a t f o o t i n g s a r e founded on soils of sufficient load bearing capacity, it I s e s s e n t i a l t h a t t h e soil engineer Inspect the footing excavations prior to the p l a c e m e n t o f r e i n - forcing steel or concrete. With regard to buildings encroaching on Areas A and B , d u e t o t h e v a r i a t i o n i n loading history between these areas and the remainder of t h e s i t e I t w i l l b e necessary to preload these building sites with surcharge fil l t o m i t i g a t e t h e potential for excessive differential settlements. Surchargin g ( p r e l o a d i n g ) techniques require that several feet of fill (in addition to t h a t r e q u i r e d t o raise the site grade to the desired level) be placed over th e a r e a s t o b e occupied by buildings. The additional fill weight consoli d a t e s t h e u n d e r l y i n g soft deposits for a period of time such that a major porti o n o f t h e a n t i c i p a t e d ultimate settlements occur prior to construction. The requ i r e d t h i c k n e s s o f surcharge fill Is dependent upon the anticipated building lo a d s , t h e t h i c k n e s s of the compressible layer, the expected settlements under t h e p r o p o s e d a d d e d fill and building loads, and the time available to complete t h e s u r c h a r g e program. Due to the variable loading history, if building p a d s a r e c o n s t r u c t e d in these areas it would be necessary to preload the areas t o s u c h a n e x t e n t a s to essentially preclude consolidation settlements under p e r m a n e n t l o a d s . W e estimate that this could require surcharge fills of 15 t o 3 0 f e e t f o r a p e r i o d of one to two years. If it is necessary to site building s i n t h e s e a r e a s , detailed surcharging programs should be developed for t h e s p e c i f i c l o c a t i o n s , final grade, and building size. Alternatively, driven pi l e f o u n d a t i o n s c o u l d be utilized with a reduced surcharging program. 2. Driven Pile Foundations Buildings which are higher than two stories or which h a v e I n d i v i d u a l c o l u m n loads which exceed about 150 kips should be supported o n d r i v e n , e n d - b e a r i n g pile foundations. Based on our preliminary analysis, piles d r i v e n a m i n i m u m o f five feet into dense formational material will develop an allow a b l e e n d b e a r i n g resistance of about 100 kips per square foot. The depth t o f o r m a t i o n a l material encountered In the exploratory borings and the a n t i c i p a t e d l e n g t h s f o r piles driven in the vicinity of the borings Is presented I n t h e f o l l o w i n g t a b l e . Exploratory Depth to Formational Anticipated Boring No. Material (ft.) Pile Length (ft.) 1 124 129 2 106 111 3 131 136 4 55-1/2 60-1/2 5 102-1/2 107-1/2 6 124 129 7 75 80 8 58 63 In order to preclude damage to the ground floor slabs of buildings supported on pile foundations resulting from long term settlement of the underlying compres- sible soils, ground floor slabs should be designed as a structural floor. In addition, utilities for pile supported structures should be designed to accom- modate the anticipated settlement of the surrounding ground surface relative to the structure. 11 Page 8 3. Drainage Pipes It is our understanding that 142-inch and double 48-inch drainage pipes will be I Installed In the north-south trending channels in the northern portion of the site. We estimate that up to 10 inches of settlement will occur along the channels resulting from the placement of 11 to 12 feet of comiacted fill in the channels. We recommend that the channels be properly cleared and backfilled I before Installation of the pipes and that the backfill remain in place as long as feasible prior to Installing the drainage pipes. In addition, we recommend that asphalt coated steel pipe be used in lieu of concrete pipe due to the 1 anticipated settlements. C. Pavements In our opinion the proposed dredge fill materials would provide suitable support for pavements after they have been dried and properly compacted.. However, due. to their inherent poor pavement subgrade characteristics, it will be necessary to utilize heavier than normal pavement structural sections. For preliminary planning purposes we estimate that the pavement sections should .I consist of 2 inches of asphalt concrete on 9 inches of aggregate base in auto- mobile parking areas and minor traffic channels, 2-1/2 inches on 11 inches in ' major automobile traffic channels, and 3 inches on 13-1/2 inches in areas I ;subject to truck traffic. Detailed pavement section recommendations should be developed, at the completion of rough grading based on the results of R(Resis- tance)-value tests performed on samples of the subgrade soils actually .exposed. I I I I I I I A-i I . . . APPENDIX A FIELD INVESTIGATION I The. field Investigation consisted of a surface reconnaissance and a subsurface exploration program using a truck-mounted', continuous-flight auger. Eight exploratory borings were drilled during the period of, February 5 to March 5, 1982, at the approximate locations shown on the Site Plan, Figure 1. The soils encountered in the borings were continuously logged in the field by our repre- sentatives and described in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification I System (ASTM D 2487). Logs of the borings as well as a key for soil classifi- cation are Included as part of this appendix. The boring locations shown on the site plan were estimated from topographic features depicted on an A.L.T.A. survey of the site prepared by Rick Engineering Company based on aerial photo- graphy dated August 1979. Representative samples were obtained from the exploratory borings at selected' depths appropriate to the investigation. All samples were returned' to our laboratory for evaluation and testing. Standard penetration resistance blow counts were obtained by driving a 2-inch O.D. split spoon sampler, with a I 140-pound hammer dropping through,, a 30-inch free fall. The sampler was driven a maximum of 18 inches and the number of blows recorded for each 6-inch interval. The blows per foot recorded on the boring logs represent the accumu- lated number of blows that were required to drive the last 12 inches or portion I thereof. Samples contained in liners were recovered by driving a 2.5-inch I.D. California sampler 18 Inches Into the soil using a 140-pound hammer. Boring log notations for the standard split spoon, California sampler, and Shelby tubes as well as for' jar samples taken from auger cuttings are indicated belOw. Standard Split Spoon Sampler - . California Sampler . "x" indicates a jar sample taken Shelby Tube 4 from auger cuttings. I' .The boring logs show our interpretation of the subsurface conditions on the dates and at the locations indicated, and it is not warranted that they-are representative of subsurface conditions at other locations and times. I I I' '. PRIMARY DIVISIONS GROUP SECONDARY DIVISIONS SYMBOL GRAVELS CLEAN GW Well graded gravels, gravel-sand mixtures, little or no GRAVELS fines. GP Poorly graded gravels or gravel-sand mixtures, little or 0 MORE THAN HALF (LESS THAN OF COARSE 5% FINES) ___________ no fines. GRAVEL GM Silty gravels, gravel-sand-silt mixtures, non-plastic fines. ci FRACTION IS 0 W U- 2 0 w N LARGER THAN WITH Z U. NO. 4 SIEVE FINES GC Clayey gravels, gravel-sand-clay mixtures, plastic fines. SANDS CLEAN SW SANDS Well graded sands, gravelly sands, little or no fines. Cr X Cc MORE THAN HALF (LESS THAN SP Poorly graded sands or gravelly sands, little or no fines. -J OF COARSE 5% FINES) SANDS SM Silty sands, sand-silt mixtures, non-plastic fines. W L) ) FRACTION IS - SMALLER THAN WITH NO. 4 SIEVE FINES SC Clayey sands, sand-clay mixtures, plastic fines. U- w SILTS AND CLAYS ML Inoroanic silts and very fine sands, rock flour, silty or cTayey fine sands or clayey. silts with slight plasticity. o C/) < LIQUID LIMIT IS CL Inorganic clays of low to medium plasticity. gravelly clays, sandy clays, silty clays, lean clays. w LM LESS THAN 50% OL Organic silts and organic silty clays of low plasticity. Z z < 0 < x —' SILTS AND CLAYS MH Inorganic Silts, micaceous or diatomaceous tine sandy or - < ' Silty soils, elastic silts. CH Inorganic clays of high plasticity, fat clays. 2 LIQUID LIMIT IS GREATER THAN 50% OH Organic clays of medium to high plasticity, organic silts. HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS Pt Peat and other highly organic soils. DEFINITION OF TERMS U.S. STANDARD SERIES SIEVE CLEAR SQUARE SIEVE OPENINGS 200 40 10 4 3/4" 311 12" SAND I GRAVEL I I SILTS AND CLAYS 'COBBLES BOULDERS FINE I MEDIUM I COARSE I FINE I COARSE I I GRAIN SIZES SANDS,GRAVELS AND NON-PLASTIC SILTS BLOWS/FOOTt VERY LOOSE 0 — 4 LOOSE 4 -10 MEDIUM DENSE ' 10 -30 DENSE 30 - 50 VERY DENSE OVER 50 CLAYS AND PLASTIC SILTS STRENGTH BLOWS/FOOT VERY SOFT 0 - 1/4 0 - 2 SOFT 1/4-1,2 2-4 FIRM 1/2 -1 4-8 STIFF 1-2 8-16 VERY STIFF 2 — 4 16 —32 HARD OVER 4 OVER 32 RELATIVE DENSITY CONSISTENCY Number of blows of 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches to drive a 2 inch O.D. (1-3/8 inch I.D.) split spoon (ASTM 0-1586). 4Unconfined compressive strength in tons/sq. ft. as determined by laboratory testing or approximated by the standard penetration test (ASTM D-1586), pocket penetrometer, torvane, or visual observation. KEY TO EXPLORATORY BORING LOGS Unified Soil Classification System (ASTM D-2487) ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES NORTH COUNTY PLAZA Consulting Sod. Foundation & Geological Engineers Carlsbad-Oceanside, California PROJECT NO. DATE Figure A-i 239-6 April 1982 DRILLRIG Continuous Flight Auger SURFACE ELEVATION 16 (approx.)I LOGGED BY JB DEPTHTOGROUNDWATER Not Established BORINGDIAMETER 8 Inches 3/4 /82 DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION z w __ Z• 2... z w LU DEPTH (FEET) << w DESCRIPTION AND REMARKS COLOR CONSIST. B CLAYEY SAND and SANDY gray- medium SC'- - CLAY (fill) ish dense/ CL -2 - brown stiff -4- - -x FILLt brown very SM - - SILTY SAND (fill?) gray loose - - -10-- - 6 • - 12 - 14- 16- 18 - -20- SILTY CLAY with thin inter- - gray: soft CH bedded layers of SILTY SAND ish - 2 0.16 brown -t and 22.J gray. - 24 - 26 - 28 - 13 0.19 -32- -34- - 36- - 38- Note: The stratification lines represent the approximate - boundary between material types and the transition may — 40— be gradual., EXPLORATORY BORING LOG NORTH COUNTY PLAZA ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES Consulting Soil. Foundation & Geological Engineers . Carlsbad-Oceanside, California PROJECT NO. DATE BORING NO. 239-6 April 1982 DRILLRIG Continuous Flight Auger SURFACE ELEVATION 16 (approx.) LOGGEDBY JB DEPTH TOGROUNDWATER Not Established BORING DIAMETER 8 Inches DATE DRILLED 3 /4 /82 DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION ZJ_ Lit DEPTH (FEET) CL m<<5 M >üj DESCRIPTION AND REMARKS S COLOR CONSISTBOL. . YPE Lit co cc 00 z 8 SILTY CLAY with thin inter- - gray- soft CH . 13 - 0.18 bedded layers of SILTY SAND ish -42 - brown - and -44 gray - -x • -46 - -48- -50- 0.23 -52- 4 -x -56- 58 SANDY CLAY gray stiff CL - -60- S ..]Iio. - 62 - -64- 66- -68- -70 very ••_L 18 • stiff 72- • 74.. S -x —76 78- Note: The stratification lines represent the approximate boundary between material types and the transition may -80- be gradual. S • EXPLORATORY BORING LOG NORTH COUNTY PLAZA ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES Consulting Soil Foundation 6 Geological Engineers Carlsbad-Oceanside, California PROJECT NO. DATE. BORING • NO. 1(pg.2) 239-6 April 1982 DRILLRIG Continuous Flight Auger SURFACE ELEVATION 16 (approx.)I LOGGED BY 'J DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER Not Established BORING DIAMETER 8 Inches DATE DRILLED 3 /4 /8'2 - DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION zw__ w (FEEF1 DESCRIPTION AND REMARKS S BOL COLOR CONSIST. . SILTY SAND V gray medium SM - - 42 and dense- 82 - gray-, dense - - ish -84- brown 86 - -88 - -90 -j medium 20 dense - 92 -94- - 96 '- 98 —100-- - I16 -102- 104 - -r- 'V V.108 V _110-I25 -112- V V -114- - V -116- * 118- Note: The stratification lines represent the approximate boundary between material types and the transition may -120- be gradual. V EXPLORATORY BORING LOG ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES NORTH COUNTY PLAZA , V Consulling Soil. FoundoHon 6 Geological Engineers Carlsbad-Oceanside, California PROJECT NO. DATE I -1 BORING NO. 1(pg.3) - • 239-6 April 1982 I I U I I I I I i i i I i I I I i DRILLRIG Continuous Flight Auger SURFACE ELEVATION 16 (approx.) LOGGEDBY JB DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER Not Established I BORING DIAMETER. 8 Inches jDATE DRILLED 3/14/82 DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION zuj__ ti —::- (FEET) zuji DESCRIPTION AND REMARKS S COLOR CONSIST. SOIL . CO su cc 0 2 cc BOL YPE 3 SILTY SAND gray medium SM - -] 27 dense -122- .124 - - SILTY CLAY (formational olive hard CH mudstone) - 126- - - =L38 . Bottom of Boring = 126 Feet Note: The stratification lines represent the approximate - - boundary between material types and the transition may - - be gradual. EXPLORATORY BORING LOG NORTH COUNTY PLAZA ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES Consulting Sot, Foundation 6 Geological Engineers - Carlsbad-Oceanside. Cal iforni a PROJECT NO. I DATE BORING NO. 1(pg.4) 239-6 April_1982 DRILLRIG Continuous Flight Auger SURFACE ELEVATION 21 (approx.) LOGGEDBY LTJ DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER Not Established BORING DIAMETER 8 Inches - DATE DRILLED 2 /5 /82 DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION (FE < zw_. z - Z o: u I- w O W 3 CC DESCRIPTION AND REMARKS S BOL COLOR CONSIST.SOIL SILTY SAND and CLAYEY gray- medium SM - - - SAND with scattered cobbles (fill) ish brown dense SC - 2 - - - X - 4 X41 H -6 - 36 —10- 12 3$ - 14 - -16 FILL - gray 18 - SILTY CLAY ILL 8. 0.17 22 - 24.- -26- * -28- 0.22 32 • . .. 34 -36- -38- Note: The stratification lines represent the approximate - - boundary between material types and the transition may be gradual. - 40- EXPLORATORY BORING LOG NORTH COUNTY PLAZA ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES Consulting Soil. Foundation & Geological Engineers Carlsbad-Oceanside, California PROJECT NO. DATE BORING NO. 2 (pg. 1) 239-6 April 1982 i DRILLRIG Continuous Flight Auger SURFACE ELEVATION 21 (approx.) LOGGEDBY LTJ DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER Not Established BORING DIAMETER 8 Inches 1DATE DRILLED 2/5/82 DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION CC DEPTH 91(F z w _... 00 uj z 8 Ui co DESCRIPTION AND REMARKS SYM COLOR ONSISTBOL. C TYPE SILTY CLAY gray soft CH - - 6 _42- 46- -48- v II -50- 52 - 0.21 .54- -56- p -58- -60— (some thin layers of silty 16 and clayey sand from 61 to ifi feet) - - 62 - - - -64- -66- 68- -70- - 10 72 72 - .74-. -16- -78- Note: The stratification lines represent the approximate - boundary between material types and the transition may -80 - be gradual. EXPLORATORY BORING LOG NORTH COUNTY PLAZA ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES Consulting Soil. Foundation & Geological Engineers Carlsbad-Oceanside, California PROJECT NO. DATE . BORING NO.. 2 (pg. 2) 239-6 April'1982 I II I I I I HI DRILLRIG Continuous Flight Auger SURFACE ELEVATION 21 (approx.) LOGGEDBY LTJ DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER Not Established BORING DIAMETER 8 Inches DATE DRILLED 2/5/82 DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION CC zw__ 00 - w csw DEPTH (FEET) DESCRIPTION AND REMARKS BOL COLOR CONSIST. SILTY CLAY gray soft CH _ 82- -84- - 86 - 88 - 1.4 SILTY SAND - gray medium SM ;90 dense - 92 - 94 - 96 98 102- .104- : X SILTY SAND (formational -gray very . SM sandstone) dense - 108 -110-]: i - - 911 -112- - -114 106 Bottom of Boring = 115 Feet _________________________________ Note: The The stratification lines represent the approximate -. - boundary between material types and the transition may - - be gradual. EXPLORATORY BORING LOG NORTH COUNTY PLAZA ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES Consulting Soil. Foundation & Geological Enginees Carlsbad-Ocean side, California PROJECT NO. DATE BORING NO. 2 (pg. 3) 239-6 April 1982 DRILLRIG Continuous Flight Auger SURFACE ELEVATION ,- 17 (approx.) LOGGED BY LTJ DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER Not Established BORING DIAMETER 8 Inches DATE DRILLED 3/1/82 DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION DEPTH _j cx: u cc DESCRIPTION AND REMARKS S COLOR CONSIST. - BOL U) SOIL (F . CLAYEY SAND wijh scattered gray- medium SC - - cobbles (fill) ish dense -2 - x brown - - -6- -8- - <32 —10—_ 12 : - - SANDY CLAY (fill) - dark gray- soft- firm CL : / - ish SM __ /14>< —16 T - - - - SILTY SAND (fill) FILL I_ gray loose _L. SILTY CLAY black soft CH - -18- gray - - —20- 22 - 0.13 24 11_ 26- 28 - SILTY SAND - gray medium SM ° dense 32 - 34 :I14 I 13 -36 Note: The The stratification lines represent the approximate - boundary between material types and the transition may —40- be gradual. EXPLORATORY BORING LOG : NORTH COUNTY PLAZA ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES Consulting Soil. Foundation & Geological Engineers Carlsbad-Ocean side, California PROJECT NO. DATE BORING NO. 3 (pg. 1) 239-6 April 1982 DRILLRIG Continuous Flight Auger SURFACE ELEVATION 17 (approx.) LOGGEDBY LTJ DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER Not Established BORING DIAMETER 8 Inches - DATE DRILLED 3/1/82 AND CLASSIFICATION WDESCRIPTION DEPTH (FEET) cc a. Z_ 00L 9 > - cc OR <(U z W2!x gjC DESCRIPTION AND REMARKS S BOL COLOR CONSIST. Interbedded SILTY CLAY and gray/ soft— CL)- - 5 0.19 SANDY SILT dark firm ML -42 - gray - 44 46 --50— 5 0.14 SILTY CLAY dark soft CU gray - -52- .54- -56- -58 - —60-- - 13 . 0.26 - SILTY SAND gray medium dense SM 62 - -.64- -66 - -68- -70-- - - 25. 72- -74 —76 Note: The stratification lines represent the approximate boundary between material types and the transition may 80 I I be gradual. EXPLORATORY BORING LOG ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES NORTH COUNTY PLAZA Consulting Soil. Foundoiion & Geological Engineers Carlsbad—Oceanside, California PROJECT NO. DATE BORING - - . S - NO. 3 (pg. 2) 239-6 April 1982 DRILLRIG Continuous Flight Auger SURFACE ELEVATION 17 (approx.) LOGGEDBY LTJ DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER Not Established BORING DIAMETER 8 Inches DATE DRILLED3/1/82 DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION cc zuJ _ - cr w cr csw DEPTH ..(FEET) ~<ö tJ >iZ DESCRIPTION AND REMARKS S COLOR CONSISTBOL. Sol V) z - 8 Ir 0. cc SILTY SAND - gray medium I18 -. dense : - 82 - - 84 86- -88 - -90- 92 - -94- 96:1 15 H -400- - -102- -104- dense - 106 I41 108- -flo—. - - -114 33 • :116: I Note: The stratification Ones represent the approximate - boundary between material types and the transition my 120- be gradual. - EXPLORATORY BORING LOG NORTH COUNTY PLAZA ROBERTPRATER ASSOCIATES Consulting Soil. Foundation & Geological Engineers Carl sb ad-Ocean side, California PROJECT NO. DATE BORING - 0 - NO. 3 (pg. 3) 239-6 April 1982 DRILLRIG Continuous Flight Auger SURFACE ELE VATION 17 (approx.) LOGGEDBY LTJ DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER Not Established BORING DIAMETER 8 Inches DATE DRILLED 3/1/82 DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION cc zw__ 00 uj SOIL E zW • Ui 8 in DESCRIPTION AND REMARKS S COLOR BOL TYPE CONSIST. - SILTY SAND gray dense SM - - --122- -124- 126 41 -• -128 - -130--- ___________ __________-X9O CLAYEY SAND (formational brown very SC -132- sandstone) dense / - • Bottom of Boring = 131-1/2 Fee Note: The stratification lines represent the approximate - boundary between matertaJ types and the transition may - - be gradual. EXPLORATORY BORING LOG NORTH COUNTY PLAZA ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES Consulting Soil. Foundation & Geofogicol Engineers Carlsbad-Oceanside, California PROJECT NO. DATE BORING NO. 3 (pa. 4) 239-6 April_1982 DRILLRIGV Continuous Flight Auger SURFACE ELEVATION 19 (approx.) LOGGEDBY JB DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER Not Established BORING DIAMETER 8 Inches IDATE DRILLED 2/26/82 DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION • tr zw 001 - (w - _____ ______ - DEPTH 0. (FEET) co < zo DESCRIPTION AND REMARKS BOL COLOR CONSIST. . SOIL ro 01 z in 8 Cr 0 co CLAYEY SAND and SANDY . gray medium SC4 - - CLAY with scattered dense/ CL -2 - cobbles (fill) gray- very - - ish stiff - 4 - • • brown Z V dark gray :8: • —10— V _]I 13 - 12 - -14- £ loose/ -. - - FILL dark soft soft- CH - 16 - - - X 10 SILTY.CLAY gray firm - 18 - . - - 20 — V -::I 9 0.25 -24- -26- - * -28- 12 SILTY SAND with some thin - gray medium SM l ayers of SILTY CLAY ' dense 32 -34- -36- -38 - Note: The stratification lines represent the approximate - - boundary between material types and the transition may -40 - be gradual. EXPLORATORY BORING LOG NORTH COUNTY PLAZA ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES Consulting Soil. Foundation & Geological Engineers * Carl sbád-Ocean side, California PROJECT NO. DATE BORING . • NO. 4 V 239-6 April 1982 DRILLRIG Continuous Flight Auger SURFACE ELEVATION 19 (approx.) LOGGED BY JB DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER Not Established BORING DIAMETER 8 Inches DATE DRILLED 2 /26/82 DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION z w__.. - w DESCRIPTION AND REMARKS S COLOR CONSISTBOL. . C,) ' SILTY SAND with some thin gray medium SM - - 20 layers of SILTY CLAY ' dense -'42 - * -44 .. -46- -48 - -59- - 52 - gray- : -128 ISh brown 54 56 - . X 93 CLAYEY SAND/SILTY. SAND gray dense SC/- (formational sandstone) ' SM - - —60— -62- ' - 64 -)( 71 Bottom of Boring = 65 Feet - 66 - Note: The stratification tines represent the approximate -' - boundary between matertai types and the transition may be gradual. 4 EXPLORATORY BORING LOG ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES NORTH COUNTY PLAZA Consulting Soil. Foundation & Geological Engineers Carlsbad-Ocean side, California PROJECT NO. DATE BORING NO. 4 (pg. 2) 239-6 April 1982 DRILLRIG Continuous Flight Auger SURFACE ELEVATION 17 (approx.)I LOGGEDBY JB DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER Not Established BORING DIAMETER 8 Inches jDATE DRILLED 2 /26/82 DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION V zwV._. - 'U OW E SOIL FE DESCRIPTION AND REMARKS BOL V COLOR CONSIST. . SILTY SAND and CLAYEY gray medium SM, - - SAND (fill) dense SC -2 - V (scattered cobbles) V . 4 - V V 6j I 17 V V -8- -10-- brown V - 20 V V -12- FILLt 14 - SILTY CLAY dark soft CH gray -16 5 V 0.19 V 18 V -20- V V 22 V 24- V • .26 -14 0.16 • -28- V V V -30- V 32- V -34 V V -36 4 0.14 V V 38 - Note: The strtitication lines represent the approximate boundary between material types and the transition may -40 - be gradual. V V V EXPLORATORY BORING LOG V NORTH COUNTY PLAZA ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES Consulting Soil, Foundation 6 Geological Engineers Carlsbad-Ocean side, California PROJECT NO. DATE BORING V V . NO. 5 (pg. 1) • 239-6 April 1982 DRILLRIG Continuous Flight Auger SURFACE ELEVATION 17 (approx.)I LOGGEDBY J DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER Not Established BORINGDIAMETER 8 Inches DATE DRILLED 2 /26/82 DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION cc zuJ __. 00~ cw F - DESCRIPTION AND REMARKS COLOR BOL TYPE CONSIST.W SOIL zwi W CC z V) 0 CL ui SILTY CLAY •. . dark soft CH - gray -.42- -44- -46-I 3 0.144 -48- -50- -52- 54 56j11 58 : 62 : SILTY SAND - gray medium -- dense -64 brown :66 : 37 -68- -70- -72- -74 dense -76-I 38 78 Note: The stratification lines represent the approximate - - boundary between material types and the transition may -80- - be gradual. EXPLORATORY BORING LOG ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES NORTH COUNTY PLAZA Consulting Soil. Foundation &Geologicaf Engineers . Carlsbad-Oceanside, California PROJECT NO. DATE BORING NO. 5 (pg. 2) 239-6 111 April 1982 DRILLRIG Continuous Flight Auger SURFACE ELEVATION 17 (approx.) LOGGED BY JB DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER Not Established BORING DIAMETER 8 Inches ]DATE DRILLED 2 /26/82 DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION cc Z_.. OU L -; u uj DESCRIPTION AND REMARKS B COLOR SYM- - CONSIST. SOIL (F . SILTY. SAND gray mediuni SM -X 45 dense -.82- 84'-- - . 86- 88 - -90- 57 - - -92- -94 -96- -98- I- -100- 43 102 - - SANDY CLAY (formational gray hard C H :laystone) . . - ,04 - -J2 . 106._9H • 108 Bottom of Boring .110 Feet - - Note: The stratification lines represent the approximate boundary between material types and the transition may be gradual. EXPLORATORY BORING LOG . NORTH COUNTY PLAZA ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES Consulting Soil. Foundotion 6 Geological Engineer .Carlsbad-Oceanside, California PROJECT NO. DATE I BORING . NO. 5 (pg. 3) H 239-6 • April _1982 I / . . DRILLRIG Continuous Flight Auger DEPTH TOGROUNDWATER Not Established I SURFACE ELEVATION 16 (approx.) LOGGEDBV .JB BORING DIAMETER 8 Inches DATE DRILLED 3 /3/82 DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION z w __ -; w DESCRIPTION AND REMARKS COLOR CONSIST. . B CLAYEY SAND (fill) brown medium SC dense -2 -s gray— -. - ish - 4 - brown -6- -8- -10-- loose— - - >< 19 medium - 12 - dense 14 FILL 16 SILTY CLAY . gray soft CH - - -18- - —20 -- 7 . 0.23 -22 - -24-. -26 28 -30- -- 15 SILTY SAND dark medium SM - 32 - gray dense 34 • -36- -38- Note: The stratification lines represent the approximate - boundary between material types and the transition may _40- be gradual. -, EXPLORATORY BORING LOG NORTH COUNTY PLAZA ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES Consulting Soil. Foundation & Geologicol Engineers Carlsbad—Ocean side, California' PROJECT NO. DATE BORING NO. 6 (pg. 1) 239-6 April 1982 C DRILLRIG Continuous Flight Auger SURFACE ELEVATION 16 (approx.) LOGGEDBY JB DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER Not Established I BORING DIAMETER 8 Inches DATE DRILLED 3 /3 /82 DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION , CC zw__ 00I ., Ui D UJ DEPTH (F z DESCRIPTION AND REMARKS S COLOR CONSISTBOL.SOIL '0 CC TYPE Z ' LU 0 to SILTY SAND dark medium SM - - 8 0.17 gray dark dense soft CH -42 - - .44 SILTY CLAY gray - - -46- - -48 - —50—-i- (some interbedded silty sand) - J 0.16 -52- -54- -56 - -'58- ___________________ 60 26 0.10 T Interbedded SILTY SAND and gray medium SM! - , 1 CLAYEY SAND . dense, SC - 62 • -64- -66 - -68- —70--,- gray- 21 Ish 72 _L brown -74 - - -76 - • -78- Note: The stratification lines represent the approximate - - boundary between material types and the transition may , —80— be gradual. S ' EXPLORATORY BORING LOG NORTH COUNTY PLAZA ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES Consulting Soil. Foundation & Geological Engineers Carlsbad-Oceanside, California PROJECT NO. BORING NO. 6(pg.2) DAT E198E2] 239-6 April DRILLRIG Continuous Flight Auger SURFACE ELEVATION 16. (approx.)I LOGGEDBY JB DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER Not Established BORING DIAMETER 8 Inches IDATE DRILLED 3/3/82 DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION DEPTH (FEET) -J <y5 IJ 'w < >I ujZCrw 1w Z cc DESCRIPTION AND REMARKS - SBv COLOR CONSIST. , SOIL . YPE cr Co co Interbedded SILTY SAND and gray— medium SM, - - I 19 CLAYEY SAND ish dense SC -.82 - brown -84- -86- -88 - —90--i-- --J3O. -92- • . . -94- -96- -98- -100- - -1122 -102- • .104- -106- 108- green- -hO--1- • J37 dense - 112 - ish gray -114- - . N. -116- :118: . SILTY SAND . - bray. mediim dense SM . . - Note: The stratification lines represent the approximate 59 boundary between material types and the transition may . 420-- - be gradual. EXPLORATORY BORING LOG NORTH COUNTY PLAZA ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES Consulting Soil. Foundation & Geological Enginees Carl sbad-Oceañ side, California PROJECT NO. DATE BORING NO. 6 (pg. 3) 2396 April 1982 DRILLAIG Continuous Flight Auger SURFACE ELEVATION 16 (approx.) LOGGEDBY J ' DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER Not Established BORING DIAMETER 8 Inches - DATE DRILLED 3/3/82 DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION /cc zw__ 00~ - ir : w OW DEPTH (FEET) 2 << w DESCRIPTION AND REMARKS S cc t; COLOR CONSISTBOL. SOIL TYPE uj 8 C') co 0. 8 SILTY SAND gray medium SM - - I dense -122 - :124: SANDY CLAY (formational gray hard CL claystone) -126 - -128 - brown - - =-i30—= Bottom of Boring = 130 Feet - Note: The stratification, fines represent the approximate - - boundary between material types and the transition may S - be gradual. EXPLORATORY BORING LOG NORTH COUNTY PLAZA ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES Consulting Soil. Foundation i Geofogicof Engineers Carlsbad-Oceanside, California PROJECT NO. DATE BORING NO. 6 (pg. 239-6 April 1982 I a I I I I I I I I LI I I I I I I I I DRILLRIG Continuous Flight Auger SURFACE ELEVATION 16 (approx.)l LOGGEDBY LTJ DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER Not Established BORING DIAMETER 8 Inches J_DATE DRILLED 3 /5 /82 DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION DEPTH (FEET) cc zw__ - w xz DESCRIPTION AND REMARKS S COLOR CONSISTBOL.. . SILTY SAND and CLAYEY gray— medium SM - - SAND (fill) ish dense SC brown - - and brown .4 - 6 -Z 26 - -10-- loose 8 -12- 14 - x FILLt -16- 18 - SILTY CLAY • gray and soft CH gray- ish - —20— brown - j 3 0.22 22- 24- 26- -28 (sand Iense at 31 feet) 19 0.16 -32 .34- -36- 38 Note: The stratification lines represent the approximate - boundary between material types and the transition may be gradual. —40 — EXPLORATORY BORING LOG NORTH COUNTY PLAZA ROBE RTPRATER ASSOCIATES Consulting Soil. Foundation £ Geological Engineers Carlsbad-Oceanside, California PROJECT NO. DATE BORING NO. 7 (pg. 1) 239-6 April 1982 I I I I I I r I 1 I DRILLRIG Continuous Flight Auger SURFACE ELEVATION 16 (approx.)I LOGGEDBY LTJ DEPTHTOGROUNDWATER Not Established BORINGDIAMETER 8 Inches JDATEDRILLED 3/5/82 - DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION .Cr 00 Z 2t X • _____ ______ DEPTH (FEET) U) z Cl) - 3 DESCRIPTION AND REMARKS COLOR CONSIST. . B YPE cc SILTY CLAYS . gray soft CH - - 0.24 -42- -44. - -x • -46- --48- SILTY SAND gray medium SM - - • and dense -50- -i-- • gray- - 117 ish- ' 52- brown -54. -56 - - 58 - —60- 26 -62- -64.- -66 -68 I gray- dense - 3 ish' brown 2 - - -74. -76 - CLAYEY SAND (formational gray- dense SC sandstone) ish - . brown -78 120 Bottom of Borina = 80 Feet Note: The stratification lineepresent the approximate - -80- 311 boundary between material types and the transition may " be gradual. EXPLORATORY BORING LOG NORTH COUNTY PLAZA ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES Consulting Soil, Foundation &Geotogicol Engineers Carlsbad-Oceanside, California PROJECT NO. DATE . BORING • NO. 7 (pg. 2) 239-6 April 1982 T DRILLRIG Continuous Flight Auger SURFACE ELEVATION 17 (approx.) LOGGEDBY LTJ DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER Not Established I BORING DIAMETER 8 Inches - DATE DRILLED 3 /5 /82 DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION z Cr z Szw w DEPTH (FEET) e- DESCRIPTIONANDREMARKS s BOL COLOR CONSIST. SILTY SAND and CLAYEY.. gray— loose— SM - - SAND (fill) ish medium SC -.2 brown dense - light .6><21 - gray 8 - CLAYEY SAND (fill?) - gray medium SC - - dense -10- soft CH 12 SILTY CLAY gray , S 14- 16 0.21 18- -20- S -22- -24- -• '5 ' 0.15 26111 7 28- -30- 32 Interbedded SILTY SAND and - gray medium : - CLAYEY SAND with some dense sc SILTY CLAY and GRAVEL -. 34 S lenses - 30 -36- 38- Note: The stratification lines represent the approximate - boundary between material types and the transition may -40- be gradual. • EXPLORATORY BORING LOG NORTH COUNTY PLAZA ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES Consulting Soil. Foundaiin & Geological Engineers Carlsbad-Oceanside, California PROJECT NO. DATE BORING - NO. 8 (pg. 1) 239-6 April 1982 DRILLRIG Continuous Flight Auger SURFACE ELEVATION 17 (approx.) LOGGEDBY LTJ DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER Not Established BORING DIAMETER 8 Inches DATE DRILLED 3 /5 /82 DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION uj,t: DEPTH DESCRIPTION AND REMARKS SYM.COLOR CONSIST. (FEEl) BOL CL lntrbedded SILTY SAND and gray dense SM/- - CLAYEY SAND with some and SC -42 - SILTY CLAY arid GRAVEL gray- - lenses ish brown - 44 - - -46J52 -48- -50- -52- -54- 5oI5 --58 CLAYEY SAND (formational gray- dense SC - sandstone) Ish —60 — brown - and 62- -. - orange . -64 66 ><88 75 Bottom of Boring = 69 Feet - -70-- Note: The stratification lines represent the approximate - - boundary between material types and the transition may — be gradual. EXPLORATORY BORING LOG ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES NORTH COUNTY PLAZA - Consulting Soil. Foundation & Geological Engineers Carlsbad-Ocean side, California PROJECT NO. DATE BORING 8 (pg.-2) NO 239-6 April 1982 ( - ••0• ---- BIBLIOGRAPHY LeRoy Crandall and Associates, "Report of Supplementary Soil Studies, Phase .11 Development, Proposed Shopping Center, El Camino Real Near The Vista Freeway, Carlsbad, California," June 9, 1967. LeRoy Crandall and Associates, "Inspection and Testing of Compacted Fill, Phase II' Grading, Proposed Plaza Camino Real Shopping Center, El Camino Real Near The Vista Freeway, Carlsbad, California," April 29, 1968. LeRoy Crandall and Associates, "Inspection and Testing of Compacted Fill, Proposed Site Improvement and Utility Services, Plaza Camino Real Shopping Center, El Camino Real Near The Vista Freeway, Carlsbad, California," June 11, 1969. LeRoy Crandall & Associates, "Settlement Data; PropQsed Phase Ill, Plaza Camino Real Shopping Center, Carlsbad, California," February 3, 1972. Woodward-Glzienski & Associates, "Preliminary Soil Investigation, Buena Vista Marshland-Fill Area, Oceanside, California," November 8, 1971. Wood ward- Gizienski & Associates, "Preliminary Soil Investigation, Buena Vista Marshland-Fill Area, Carlsbad, California," January 24, 1972. Woodward- Gizienski & Associates, "Settlement Analysis, Vista Sanitation District Schedule I-Gravity Sewer Line, Carlsbad, California," February 15, 1972. Woodward-Gizienski & Associates, "Final Report of Engineering Observation and Compaction Testing for Buena Vista Lagoon Project, Carlsbad and Oceanside, California," December 7, 1972. (. Woodward-Clyde Consultants, "Site Expansion Feasibility, Plaza Camino Real, Carlsbad, California," October 18, 1979. California Department of Transportation, Transportation Laboratory, Materials and Research, Engineering Geology Branch, "Geologic Investigation and Soil Analysis of Buena Vista Lagoon, Oceanside, San Diego County," January 1982. For Enforcement Agency Use Only Project cvEnginesr . BudngP.rrmtNumc, Certificate of Compliance (Pan 1 of 2) AF / ITuRp.M.AR C w C3421 j* Project LocaOfl Plan Chocked By City/Town Documentation Author Data Approved By Date Prescriptive Approach/Performance Approach. Strategy General I CEC Occupancy Type ..........74 2 UBC Occupancy Group/Division ..... 3 Package Selected. 4 Gross Conditioned Floor Area ......'45O ft2 Root and floors 5 Proposed Roof/Ceiling Rt (CF-2, CF-3). 2.0 hr-F-ft2/Bftl 6 Required Root/Ceiling Rt (CF-2) ......I jQ hr.F-ft2/Bti 7 Proposed Exterior Floor Rt (CF-2. CF-3) - hr-F-ft218tu 8 Required Exterior Floor Rt (CF-2) ......- hr-F-ft2/Btu Walls 9 Proposed Opaque Wail Rt (CF-2. CF-3). 2.57 hr-F-ft2/Btu 10 Wall Heat Capacity (CF-3) .........Btu/F-tt2 11 Required Opaque Wall Rt (CF-2). . . 2, hr-F-ttZ/Btu Glazing In Waits 12 Exteior Wall Area (CF-2) .........47ft2 13 Total Glazing Area (CF-2) .........4 14' ft2 14 Proposed Total Percent (Line 13/Line 12)9 15 Average Total SC (CF-2) .......... 16 Allowed Total Glazing Percent .......- 17 West Exterior Wall Area (CF-2) .......174 ft2 18 West Glazing Area (CF-2) .........Zo4. 112 19 Proposed West Percent (CF-2) .......1 20 Average West SC (CF-2) ......... 21 Allowed West Glazing Percent ...... Glazing In Root (CF-6) Proposed Allowed 22 Skylight ¶ ..........- - ft2 23 Skylight 2 ..........- - ft2 24 Skylight 3 ..........- - ft2 25 Skylight 4 ...........- ft2 26 Skylight ..........- - ft2 27 Skylight 6 ......... - ft2 28 Skylight ..........- - ft2 29 Skylight ..........- ft2 Lighting 30 Proposed A4usted LPD (CF-5) .......Watts/ft2 31 Allowed LPD (CF-5) ............Watts/ft2 HVAC t ,&J. 32 Performance Set Selected FL44.. .PFoRM_ 33 Proposed Fan Wattage Index (CF-4) J WatisAt2 34 Allowed Fan Wattage Index ....... Wattzlft2 35 Proposed Cooling Power Index (CF.4). • BtuMt2 36 Mowed Cooling Power Index .......-I- BttiMt2 37 Proposed Heating Power Index (CF.4). . Btili/?12 38 Allowed Heating Power Index .......\J,' 9iupifft2 Form Revised September 1986 Performance Approach Energy Budget I CEC Occupancy Type ........... 2 UBC Occupancy Group/Division ..... 4 Conditioned Floor Area ......... ft2 4 Budget Table .............._____ 5 Allowed Energy Budget (WS-IA). . . . kBfts/yr-ft2 Calculated Annual Energy Consumption 6 Approved Calculation Method ...... 7 CEC Designation ............. 8 Multiplier ................ Estimated Energy Use 9 Heating ................ kBtu/yr-1t2 10 Cooling ................ k8tulyr-1t2 11 Fans ......... ... ...... kBtutyr-ft2 12 Lights ..................- k8ti.i/yr-f12 13 Miscellaneous Equipment ........ kBtu/yr-ft2 14 Total ................. kBtuirr-112 15 A. Total Energy Use (line 8 x line 14) . . k8tu/yr-ft2 Compliance Statement General. The proposed building represented in this set of compliance documentation is consistent with the other compliance forms and worksheets, with the plans and specifications and with any other calculations or computer runs submitted with this permit application. Performance Approach. (when applicable) The energy performance estimate presented on this form was calculated using the approved calculation method indicated above and with the CEC established fixed and restricted engineering inputs for the applicable dimate zone and occupancy type Prescriptive Approach. (when applicable) The proposed building has been designed to meet the requirements of the Alternative Component Package indicated above for the appropriate occupancy type and climate zone Signed 1-t4L1 fl, L'Afl#1 Zr, ;1a<) Name/Title ?A A&4 (TT$ Company Address tfit4 CAr4 Dcagr.1 City/Skate/Zip (b141 .12 1-0131 TeleØone Calif. License Number Page jol.jx.... Certificate of Compliance (Part 2 of 2) CF-i * IfQRJh= Pt 2A ForEnforment Agency Use Only Protect Tide M TITO/ Z-(i d 7 DocumenteDon Author/Fwm Date - ,Checked By Date Both parts one and two of this Certificate of Compliance must be included with each building permit application for the above noted building and appear on the plans submitted for approval. The building features and requirements represented on the Certificate of Compliance are adequate to achieve compliance with thasecond generation nonresidential energy standards for the building referenced above. The building features and requirements are also adequate for any subsequent alterations, modifications or additions to the building. Designer One Designer Three Name (Print) Name (Print) Title/Company Name Tide/Company Name Address Address Signature Date Signature Date Enforcement Agency Sgnature Date Enforcement Agency Signature Date Designer Two Designer Four Name (Print) Name (Print) $416. Title/Company Name I . • Tide/Company Name Addres4 Address -. V Signature V Date Signature , Date Enforcement Agency Signature Date Enforcement Agency Signature Date Owner V V Enforcement Agency flflIES KM 00,1N1Y ASSccLATS, a Oalff g. ptnrp. BY:HI-W, a Calif. g. pUitip., Ctera1 V V V Calif - • Name (Print) al Parr Tide/Agency V V Thatis H V Address Ge*ml rtne ICo!rat M=, Ste. 2%, Neigrt Be8ch, CA 92660-7929 j'-ff1 Form R.vis.d September 1966 DOCUMENTATION FORM Form 5 BUILDING LIGHTING COMPLIANCE PrMect Title LO/fVe /f Documented by 7 Location Project Designer 7f 4LSA..//' Checked by___________ Date 22 87 Room Room RCR Task Areas Note Sq. Ft. No. Sq. Ft. Total Watts Allotted Design No. So. Ft. Anni /n.-- /T —t, c,, cf ic,. C. ui.... 80 0-AWCUS 333 70 7()5 ,VON- 7fsK - - - I. 2 o 5'L 7/466- 610 ____ ___ ____ .1. • ____________ ____ _____ ____ ____ ______ _____ .1• ___ ___ ___ _________ ___ ____ ___ ___ ____ I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ELECTRICAL DESIGN DATA CON - TA1ND MERLIN CONFORMS ESSENTIALLY WITH THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDARDS FOR NEW NON-RESIDENTIA 81)1 GS. I S I Page Total ~W6 711 - y Westland ,. Healing & Air Conditioning, Inc. • 3041 Pose4I St.. Los kgees. CA 90065 (213) 2546762 S NORTH COUNTY PLAZA . ) • . BLDG M. CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA ENVELOPE COMPLIANCE S . FORM.. 1 'I FORM 2 S. S... FORM 3 HVAC SYSTEMS COMPLIANCE FORM 4 . . FORM. 6 A.C. EQUIP'T. PAYNE PKG. HEAT PUMP CONTROLS - Honeywell THE CALIFORNIA STATE ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDARDS FOR NEW NON RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND THIS PORTION OF THE BUILDING DESIGN SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS TO THEM. ,4_4 f446 WESTLAND HEATING &. AIR CONDITIONING C C L #349594 BUILDING ENVELOPE SUMMARY I FORM BUILDING ENVELOPE COMPLIANCE PROJECT DESIGNER: SGPA PLANNING & DOCUMENTED BY: A.G. ARCHITECTURE DATE: 1/13/1987 PROJECT TITLE: NORTH COUNTY PLAZA/ SHOP BLDG. M PROJECT ADDRESS: CARLSBAD, CA SITE DESCRIPTION Location Code Number 157 Solar Factor - SF: 122.7 Latitude 33.2, Cooling Delta 1: 6 (design T..78F) Heating Degree Days 2092 . BUILDING DESCRIPTION Occupancy Type Code: 074 Gross Conditioned Floor Area, sf. : 4850 , No. of Floors: 1 Avg. Gross Cord. Floor Area, sf.: 4850 Avg. Wall Height per Floor, ft.: , 15 HEATING DESIGN CRITERION Standard Proposed Uow ----- 0.429 ' Uow -------0. 389 Uor ------ -0.100 Uor ----- -0.050 Uof -----. Uof ----- Max Allow Uo -----0.264 ' Proposed Uo ------0.219 IF Proposed Uo ( or = to Max Allow Uo, Then Building Complies On Heating Design COOLING DESIGN CRITERION . Standard Proposed OTTVw --- 31.6 . OTTVw --- 27.6 OTTVr --- 4.1 . OTTVr --- 1.3 Max Allow OTTV --- 17.78 . Proposed OTTV ---- 14.35 IF Proposed OTTV < or = to 'Max Allow Oily, Then Building Complies On Cooling Design. - __---_-_---_-_- MATERIALS DATA FORM BUILDING ENVELOPE COMPLIANCE FORM 2 . PROJECT: NORTH COUNTY PLAZA/ SHOP BLDG. M HEATING DESIGN CRITERION Wall Area * U-Value * MCF = Toti BTUH ----------------- Type 1 3195 0.090 1.00 288 Type 2 170 0.096 1.00 16 Type 0 Type 0 Total Aw 3365 Subtotal 304 Door Area * U-Value * MCF Tot BTUH Type 1 21 0.49 1.00 10 Type 2 0 0.8 1.00 0 Total Pd 21 Subtotal 10 Glazing Area * 'U-Value = Tc'tl BTUH Type 1 1414 1.1 1555 Type C) Type 3.. 0 Total Ag 1414 Subtotal 1555 Toa1 Pow 4800 Total Heatq BTUH 1870 Uow = Total Heat / Pow • = 0.389 Roof Area * U-Value ------------------------------------------------------------------------- = Toti BTUH Type 1 3315 0.05 166 Type 2 1535 0.05 77 Type 0 Total Ar 4850 Subtotal 243 • Skylight Area * U-Value = • Tcstl BTUH Typel 0 0 Total As 0 • Subtotal 0 Total Por 4850 • • • Total Heatq BTUH 243 Uor= Total Heat,/ Aor = 0.050 MATERIALS DATA FORM oaqe 2 -' FORM 2 PROJECT: NORTH COUNTY PLAZA/ SHOP BLDG. M • COOLING DESIGN CRITERION Summer Wall Area * U-Value * TDeq = Toti BTUH Type 1 3195 0.079 44' ' 11106 Type 2 170 0.08 44 598 • Type 0 0 Type 0 0 Total Aw 3365 Subtotal 11704 • Summer Door area * U-Value * TDeq = Toti. BTUH Type 1 21 0.49 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 0 0 Type 0 0.8 0 0 Total Ad 21 Subtotal 0 Glazing Area * C ( SF * 'SC )+(U-VALUE * ID ) 3 = Toti BTUH Type 1 783 122.7 0.97 1.06 6 98172 Type 2 631 30 0.97 1.06 6 22375 Type 0 Total Ag 1414 S Subtotal 120547 • Total Row' 4800 ' Total Coolq BTUH 132251 OTTVw = Total Coolg / Row 27.55 Roof Area U-Value Ac Mc 41 Totl BTUH Type 1 3315 0.044 0.79 0.92 41 4346 • Type 2 1535 0.041 079 0.92 41 1875 • Type 0 . ' , 0 Total Ar 4850 . . Subtotal 6222 Skylight Area * C ( 118-* SC )+( U-Value * TD ) 3 = • Tc'tl BTUH Type 1 0 118 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ • 6 0 Total. As 0 5 5 Subtotal 0 Total Aor 4850 . . Total Coolq BTUH 6222 OTTVr = Total Coolg / Aor =1.28 • - MATERIALS DATA FORM paqe 3 - FORM 2 PROJECT: NORTH COUNTY PLAZA/ SHOP BLDG. M HEATING DESIGN CRITERION • C STD Uow * Pow ) .+ ( STD Uor * Por MAX ALLOW Uow = 0.429 *• 4800 ) + ( 0.1 * 4850 ------------------------------------------------------------- P0 2544 = ---------------------------= Max Uo 0.264 9650 ========= C PROP Uow * Pow ) + C PROP Uor * Por ) PROPOSED Uow = - P0 - (0.389491 * 4800 ) + C 0.05 • * 4850 --------------------------------------------------------------- 2112 = ---------------------------= Prop Uo = 0.219 9650 • _ COOLING DESIGN CRITERION STANDARD • = • C STD OTTVw * Pow ) + C STD OTTVr * Por ) OTTV - Ro - 31.6 * • 4800 ) + ( 4.1 * 4850 Po - 171565 = ----------------------------= Std OTTV = 17.78 9650 PROPOSED = ('PROP OTTVw * Pow ) + C PROP OTTVr * Por ) OTTV • • Po 27.55234 * 4800 ) + C 1.282853 * 4850 = • • Po ' -. • 138473.0 - = ---------------------------= Prop OTTV = 14. 35' - 9650 • - .PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ASSEMBLY BUILDING ENVELOPE COMPLIANCE FORM 3 WALL - 1 List Of Construction Components COOLG HEATG ******************** 1 STUCCO - CEMENT PLASTER - 7/8" 0.18 *1112 3 14 * * I I I I * 2 BUILDING PAPER - *111 II * * I II II * 3 MINERAL FIBERGLASS BLANKET - 3.5" 11.00 *111 II * * I If I I * 4 GYPSUM WALLBOARD - 5/8" 0.56 *111 II * *111 II * 5 *111 II * *111 II * 6 *11 II * *111 II * 7 S *111 II *11 II * 8 9 Outside Surface Air Film 0.68 0.68 • Inside Surface Air Film 0.25 0.17 Total Thermal Resistance (Rt) 12.67 -------------- 12.59 U-Value (1/Rt) 0.079 Adjusted U-Value = U-Value X F.F. 0.090 FRAMING: Size 2x6 Spacing 16" o. c. WALL: WT. < 15.0 lb/sf MCF 1.•09 • TDeq :7 5 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ASSEMBLY Form 3 BUILDING ENVELOPE COMPLIANCE (NR-8/81) Chick ono-and write In construction assembly number below (e.g. Wall- r' Roof-2. etc.) Wail- U Roof-_ o Floor- List of Construction Components R-Vaiue 1.iA4,41 -T1 La /' 2.p..__II iJ5LiLlTlotJ _IJ ,o WLLO,Ap.C)-/' Sketch of Construction Aeeemby Framing type:_iJO If wood complete the following and adjust construction assembly for framing: Size: _2.X Spacing: O.C'. Outside Surface Air Film Inside Surface Air Film, Total Thermal Resistance (R1) O•2b Cooling Heating ".1--I Cooling Heating Jt.14. it.4 Cooling Heating 'U-Value (1'/RT) •a.& Indicate area, weight- of •.., . Cooling Heating Construction assembly, and appropriate factors below: ' 2 U-vLU oJLJ',Ep :.. lZL9.O& Wall: Area. Note: Total and UVafue must be adjusted for the effect Weight lb/ft 2 of' framing when appropriate. MCF 10eq . Roof: Area ft Weight ______ lb/ft2 Mc Ac ' Floor: Area ft 2 (raised only) ?' . . PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ASSEMBLY F 0 R M 3 . BUILDING ENVELOPE COMPLIANCE ROOF List Of Construction Components COOLS HEATS ******************** 1 BUILT UP ROOF - 3/8 0.33 * * *============= * 2 PLYWOOD - 3/8" 0,42 * * 3 MINERAL FIBER BATT INSUL. 19 19 * 3* * * 4 AIR SPACE - (+12.0") 0.80 * 4* 5 ACOUST. CLG. TILE - 5/8" 1.25 * * 6 * ----------------* * * 7 * * * 8 9 Outside Surface Air Film 0.25 0.17 Inside Surface Air Film 0.92 0.61 Total Thermal Resistance (Rt) 22.97 22.58 S U -Value (i/Rt) 0.044 Adjusted U-Value = U-Value X F. F'. 0.050 FRAMING: Size 2 x 6 24" 0. C. ROOF: UT. C 15.0 lblsf Mc 0.92 Ac 0.79 - 0 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ASSEMBLY BUILDING ENVELOPE COMPLIANCE Form 3 (NR-8/8 1) Chick on..and write In construction assembly number below (e.g. Wall-I, Roe 12, etc.) C3 Wall- Roof-....&.... o Floor- P-.Ot7 P [let of etr,irtIt-n (nmnnnante - R-Value S 1-. MIIOt TlL_ -S -.—I IULI8...T10P4 S A.j& Sketch of Construction Assembly Framing type: If wood complete the following and adjust construction assembly for framing: Size: x Spacing: .- Q.C. Indicate area, weight of construction assembly, and appropriate factors below: Wall: Area ________ ft2 Weight ______ lb/ft2 MCF. TDeq Roof: Area ft2 Weight lb/ft2 Mc Ac Floor: Area ft 2, (raised only) .-... Outside Surface Air Film Cooling Heating Inside Surface Air Film Cooling Heating Total Thermal Resistance (R1) V Cooling Heating U-Value (1/RT) Cooling Heating PJJ1 Li-VPLLJ I.'1s'c'4 Ja) Note: Total R T and U-Value must be adjusted for the effect of framing when appropriate. V S.. S S DOCUMENTATION FORM F 0 R N 4 H V A C SYSTEMS COMPLIANCE PROJECT DESIGNER: SGPA DOCUMENTED BY: A. G. PLANNING ,& ARCHITECTURE DATE: 1-13-87 PROJECT TITLE: NORTH COUNTY PLAZA! SHOP BLDG. M PROJECT ADDRESS: CARLSBAD, CA DESIGN CONDITIONS Building Occupancy Type ............................... .)74 Project. Latitude ..........................................33 Heating Degree Days ..................................... .092 HEATING LOAD DOCUMENTATION Outdoor Design Temperature, Winter 41 IF Indoor Design. Temperature ..................70 IF Temperature of Adjacent Unheated Spaces 56 IF Transmission Heat Loss ....................... 6125OBtuh Infiltration Air ............................. 0 Heat Loss from Infiltration .................. .0 Btuh Ventilation Air ..................485 Heat Loss from Ventilation ......... 15190 U Btuh Outdoor Air for Special Processes ............ .0 • Heat Loss from Process Air .............. Other Heat Losses(describe) ...................7644 0 U Btuh U Btuh U U TOTAL Heat Losses .............................84084 U Btuh U U COOLING LOAD DOCUMENTATION U U Outdoor Design Temperature, Summer,dry bulb 83 IF Outdoor Design Temperature, Summer, we bulb.. 68.' F U Indoor Design Temperature, Summer,dry bulb 78 IF U U Indoor Design Temperature, Summer,wet bulb 65 IF U Transmission Heat Gain ....U 31454 Btuh Infiltration Air.............................0 Heat Gain from Infiltration Air ..............0 0 CFM U U Btuh U Outdoor Air for Special Processes ............ .0 CFM U Heat. Gain for Process Air ........... ......... SOLAR Heat Gain Through Windows, ............. 0 .59059 Btuh Btuh Heat Gain from Lights, Equip't, People, etc 78485 Btuh Heat Gain Heat Gain from Other sources ....... 17623 Btuh U U Outdoor Air - CFM ! Person (Not ) Tab. Rates) 10 CFM/Prsri Heat Gain-from Outdoor Air ................... 7236Btuh U TOTALCooling Load ........................... 193858Btuh Form continued S 2 o Outdoor Air 'CFM Per Person (Not to Exceed Tabulated Minimum Ventilation Rates) - 0 CFM/Person Heat Gain From Outdoor Air Btu/Hr. Total Cooling Load ................................... Btu/Hr. TEMPERATURE CONTROL Attach manufacturers data or other, give specification or drawing reference which shows that the room thermostats meet the requirements of T20-1503 (a) and (C). REFERENCE (page or sheet No.) -YW.fLL Indicate drawing or specification reference where the temperature control device requirements given below are documented. An automatic temperature control device shall be provided for each separate HVAC system ............................... ..S e e Mech.—Pl an each zone ..................................... SIMULTANEOUS. HEATING AND COOLING The following requirements apply to the use of new energy and need not be complied with when recovered energy is used to control. temperature. In each case, when resetting hot and cold deck temperatures, one representative zone may be chosen to represent no more than ten zones.with similar heating or cooling requirements. Concurrent operation of independent heating and cooling systems serving common spaces must provide either or both of the controls given below. List reference specification page.or drawing number wherecontrol.requirements can be verified. REFERENCE Sequential temperature Control of heating and cooling systems ................................ Automatic reset of heating temperature, - to limit energy input only to that level to offset heat loss due to transmission and infiltration .................................................. Reheat systems - give reference specifications. page or drawing number which will show compliance with the following when reheating 20% or more of the total air in the system. When serving, multiple zones, controls . must automatically reset the cold air supply to the highest temperature level of -the zone requiring the most cooling ...................... .N I A Single zone reheat systems shall be, controlled to sequence heating and cooling. .......................... .N / A C. Form 4 continued '3 Dual-duct or multizone systems - give reference specifications page or drawing number which will show compliance with the following: REFERENCE Hot deck temperature:-- must be automatically reset to the lowest temperature necessary to satisfy the zone requiring the most heating ............ .N/A Cold deck temperature - must be automatically reset to the highest temperature necessary to satisfy the zone requiring the most cooling .............N/A Recooling systems - give reference specifications page or drawing number which shows compliance with the following if recooling 20% or more of the total air in the system. Controls must automatically reset The temperature of heated supply air to the lowest temperature necessary to satisfy the zone requiring, the most heating ................................ .N I A HVAC SYSTEM RESTRICTIONS & SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS Several HVAC System types have special requirements or restrictions. In this section, the type of system used in the design must be listed and any special restrictions given here referenced to • show compliance. Supply references to proper specifications page or drawing numbers. Type HVAC System Used Describe type-of system to be used (include reference for specifications for the system). RP -r'r P4&E- H —rPUMP ul.J1L TEMPFRATLIRF CONTROL IS AS SPFC'D IN RR.00IL Constant volume reheat system - when serving both interior and exterior zones - separate' cooling coils are required if the exterior zone exceeds 20% of the total air quantity through the cooling coil. REFERENCE N/A Constant volume dual-duct or multizone systems which utilize new energy to simultaneously heat and cool air streams which are subsequently mixed for temperature control are prohibited for buildings larger than 20,000-square feet of conditioned space. If used, the air leakage for dampers utilized for the mixing of heating and cooling air shall be limited to a maximum leakage of 3% of the total, air quantity handled by the dampers when operating at the. maximum system pressure to which the dampers will be subjected. Manufacturers label or nameplate shall state leakage rates. •, REFERENCE N/A -w - • - _ P,-!--' .aJJ..----... -.• -......•-••".--•! - -• - Form 4 cot1nued 4 Economize Cycle - For each cooling fan system, for other than dual-duct or multlzone systems, which serve zones having total cooling capacity greater than 134,000 Btu/hr or more than 5,000 CFM must have an economizer cycle unless one of the exceptions allowed is claimed. REFERENCE Electric Resistance Heating Systems - These systems shall not be used unless the total installed electric resistance heat does not exceed 10% (ten percent) of the annual heating energy requirement ora life cycle cost analysis. Form 8 (see Section 4.2 of this manual) shows an alternate system life cycle cost exceeds that of the electric resistance system. Give reference if less than 10 % or include Form 8 if calculating life cycle cost REFERENCE N/A MECHANICAL AND GRAVITY VENTILATION Mechanical ventilation - Dampers which are automatically interlocked, and closed on fan shutdown are required.. REFERENCE Provide Backdrpft Darnoers Gravity Ventilators -Either automatic or readily accessible manually operated dampers must be provided for all openings to the outside with the exception of combustion air openings. REFERENCE Provide Backdraft Dampers POWER CONSUMPTION IN FANS Not Applicable Low Pressure System Constant volume system Total Supply Air Quantity ............................. _____________ CFM Total Pressure of Supply Fan .........................Inches Water Total Supply Air Quantity Adjusted for Process Loads ..................... ................ CFM Total Gross Floor Area ............................... Sq. Ft. Net Fan Performance Index (FPI) .................... Variable volume system Total Supply Air Quantity at Maximum Flow .......... _________ CFM Total Pressure of Supply Fan at Maximum Flow ..... Inches Water Total Gross Floor Area ................................ Sq. FL Fan Performance Index at Maximum Flow (FPlm) • Variable Volume Adjustment Constant ............... Adjusted Fan Performance index, FPIa ............... PIPING AND DUCT INSULATION AND DUCT CONSTRUCTION - References to the piping insulation, duct insulation and duct construction requirements presented in Section 42 of the Energy Conservation Design Manual must be given below: REFERENCE PIPING INSULATION - N/A (Packaged Units) Mech.. .DUCT INSULATION - See Schedule- Install. Sht. DUCT CONSTRUCTION - Per ASHRAE Handbook & SMACHA Gu ide I Reference 4A,JJAL pviE-. Statement that the. Building Design Substantially Complies with the California Energy Commission Regulations for New Nonresidential Buildings _3j EMOPEL_ 54t & PI&. piJMP IX 5 -J • Documentation Form & HVAC Form S Equipment Compliance References giving the specification page or drawing sheet number or manufacturers data must be submitted to demonstrate compliance with Division 6 of the standards. Electrically Operated Standard rating capacity, Cooling System Btu/hr Equipment Minimum EER (COP) . Reference E42LJlp'1. Absorption ,Water Chilling Heat source (check one) T. Cooling System Direct fired (gas-oil) Equipment Indirect fired (steam-hot water) Minimum EER (COP) Reference Combustion Heating Minimum combustion Equipment (Oil and gas- efficiency at maximum fired comfort heating rated output equipment- Reference - Electrically Operated Minimum EER (COP) Heating Heat Pumps Reference Enor r., Supplementary. Heater Control Reference Electrical Résistance Space Reference for Full-Load Heating Equipment Energy Input and Output Requirement for Reference Manufacturer's Maintenance Procedure, Full and Partial Capacity and Stand-By Input(s) and Output(s) Specification Reference 4850 SF NORTH COUNTY PLAZA/ SHOP BLDG. M .CARLSBAD, CA DATE: 1-13-87 ------------------------------------------------- HEATING LOAD Desc. U x Delta I x A = Q I RF 1 0.050 29 3315 4807 RF 2 0.050 29 1535 2226 I W-1 0.090 29 3195 8339 I W-2 0.096 29 170 473 I W-3 0.000 29 0, 01 DR 0.49 29 21 298 I GLS 1 1.10 29 1414 45107 I 61250 I Vent'n. 1.08 29 x10cfm 49 ppl 15190 I Duct Loss 10 %' . 7644 I TOTAL HEATING LOAD 84084 COOLING LOAD I Desc. . U x CLTD(CLF) x A ' = Q I RF 1 0.044 20 . 3315 ' 2917 I RF 2 0.041 20 . 1535 1259 W-1 (N) 0.079 18 577 820 I (E) 0.079 55 568 2468 I (W) 0.079 27 930 1984 I (S) ' 0.079 39 1120 3451 I (S int) 0.000 0 0 I (W int) 0.000 0 0 I W-2 (E) 0.080 55 100 440 I (W) 0.080 27 40 86 I (N) 0.080 18 30 43 I 0 6-1 1.060 12 1414 17986 I G-2 , 0.80 12 0 01 31454 I SOLAR' I G-1(NE) 0.00' 0 0.00 0 0 I .OI (N) 0.97 44 0.70 1210 36150 I (S) 0.00 0 0.00 0 I (E) 0.97 227 0.51 204 22909 I (W) , 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 59059 I LIGHTS 3.41 X 1.25 12610 U 53750 I PPL (S) . 285 Btu/P 49 ppl 13823 I PPL (L) 225 Btu/P 49 ppl 109131 78485 I VENT (S) 1.08 5 xlOcfm 49 ppl 2619 I VENT (L) 0.68 14 x10cfrn 49 ppl 4617 I DESIGN CONDITION: HTG = 41 DEG F CLG = 83/68 DES F x , 1.25 x 0.55 SUBTOTAL DUCT GAIN . 2 %. S.F. TOTAL SENSIBLE COOLING LOAD' TOTAL 193858 /12,000 = GLASS 84749 /12,000 = 176234 I 3525 $ 14099 I =======-= I 193858 16.15.: 7.06 I : .•. -:' - .. . . - ''T '- --. -- -.VV- V / ,- 4' f ...•( - '-4 .(_•(_j . •'r4 ' OV' r' r ---r - .- • !.. :r •_, -_ - '1 '. ir''._• -- S - I Payne ' AirConditioning PACKAGED -" HEAT PUMPS -'- c 'Sizes O18thruO6O Indianapolis, IN ,•. - .-- '' - •0'' IrA City of industry, CA - 4 PRELIMINARY PRODUCT-DATA NOTE: USe the information in this publication for -preliminary reference onl'. Model 542G is our latest generation of packaged heat pumps for residential and commercial applications. These heat pumps are the result of our firm commitment to the design and development of the finest heat pumps modern technology can offer. Our commitment is backed by our advanced engineering, testing, and research labo- ratories; and our wealth of practical experience. Model .542G is designed in one basic cabinet size, fea- tures a round side-by-side duct configuration on sizes 018 thru 048. Rectangular duct configuration is available on 060 size only. Voltage options meet most residential and commercial requirements. Models install easily on a roof- top or a ground-level pad. FEATURES FACTORY-ASSEMBLED PACKAGE is a compact, fully self-contained, all-electric, combination heating/cooling unit that is prewired, prepiped, and precharged for mini- mum installation expense. I RUGGED, EFFICIENT; COMPRESSORS are 'specifically designed for heat pump duty and high energy efficiency during heating and cooling operation. Each compressor is hermetically sealedagainst contamination to help pro- mote longer life and dependable operation; and vibration isolated to provide quiet operation. During heating opera- tion, these reliable compressors are designed for continu- ous operation down to extremely cold outdoor tempera- tures. All compressors have internal high-pressure and overcurrent protection. INDOOR BLOWER MOTORS have been carefully selected to minimize energy consumption and to withstand the heavy-duty, year-round, operation required by heat pumps. These motors are designed to meet the require- ments of a wide variety of residential and commercial applications. -a DIRECT-DRIVE, PSC, OUTDOOR FAN MOTORS have been selected to help reduce energy consumption. Units are designed for cooling operation down to 550F. BUILT-IN RELIABILITY COMPONENTS include a suction- tube accumulator that keeps liquid refrigerant from'reach- ing the compressor, a low-pressure switch that stops the compressor if the refrigerant pressure drops to an unsafe operating level, a crankcase heater to keep the compres- sorbil warm and free of refrigerant for maximum lubricity, compressor quick-start components on single-phase unitsto improve starting characteristics, and a unique metering device to eliminate potential serviceability requirements of check valves and expansion devices. UNIT DESIGN—Indoor and outdoor coils are computer- designed for optimum heat transfer. Vertical outdoor fan discharge carries sound and air up and away. The high. voltage inlet.panel is designed to accommodate a field- installed electrical di&connect. A low-voltage terminal block simplifiesthermostat connections Refrigerant service connections make checking operating pressures easier. TIME!TEMPERATURE DEFROST system is used to increase heating cycle efficiency. This type of defrost system has proven to be very reliable. The time/tempera- ture control," looks" for coil icing conditions only at pre- Cet time intervals, starts the defrost cycle only if the defrost thermostat senses icing conditions, and automat- ically ends the defrost cycle when the coil has warmed sufficiently to melt the ice. WEATHERIZED CABINETS are constructed of heavy-duty, phosphated, zinc-coated steel; and. finished with corrosion-resistant, modified alkyd, fade-resistant, baked Malibu beige enamel. Interior surfaces of the blower sec- tion are insulated to help keep the conditioned air from being affected by the outdoor ambient temperature. ACCESSORIES SUPPLEMENTAL ELECTRIC HEATERS that mount inside the heat pump blower compartment are available in a vari- ety of KW and voltage options. Form No. PDS 542G18.1P - Size - . . C Shipping - Wt (Ibs) 018 22.1 323 024 . 22.1 329 030 22.1 346 036 24.5 357 042 29.3 402 i 048 29.3 445 060 32.8 484 - 0 * DIMENSIONAL DRAWING Model 542G-Sizes 018 thru 060 -. :T 13.30 øI330t Ue L I STANDAfo 542G REQUIRED CLEARANCE (Inches) \J_ji,1JJ))J) Top of unit ..................48 Blower access door end.... 30 :-.. .. Duct side of unit ............ .12 End opposite blower 42.12- Compressor access door access end ..............12 side ......................30 Bottom of unit above —23.54 01A anticipated snow lqlel ... 6 , - - - NOTE: Provision must be made for fresh ambient air to reach the outdoor coil without recirculation of the air from the out- - door fan discharge. . ,r .-: - I t MEETS DOE RESIDENTIAL -.-I043---I6.i6 CONSERVATION SERVICES PROGRAM STANDARDS. 0.88 OIA LV ENTRY SUPPLY-AIR SUPPLY-AIR SUPPLY-AIR SUPPLY-AIR / CUTLET INLET • I OUTLET INLET I.I8-Hk-/ 'I -I56. O600NLY - / - - IlliliHlHhI1IllhII11llIl1 \. - 27.87 IstoOF ;.Hrl U 8.11 111.111! H T;01f 196 - 0.75 I.2a 3.54..I -I3.7I- u-IS 7I- 141 I.37014H.V. ENTRY I4000IATYP aSs 1.63 DIA ELECTRICAL HEAT ENTRY SEE VIEW IVIEW.AI 542G DIMENSIONS-AND WEIGHTS - S SPECIFICATIONS-MODEL 542G-SIZES 018 THRU 036 MODEL 542G SIZE N018 N024 N030 P030 N036 P036 E036 ELECTRICAL Unit Volts-Phase (60Hz) 208-230-1 208-230-1 208-230-1 208/230-3 208-230-1 208/230-3 460-3 Operating Voltage Range 187-253 187-253 187-253 187-253 187-253 187-253 414-506 Unit Ampacity for Wire Sizing 16.3 19.1 21.9 14.6 27.2 18.2 9.0 Minimum Wire Size(AWG)t 12 12 10 14 10 12 14 Total Unit Amps 13.9 16.2 18.4 12.6 22.9 15.2 7.75 Compressor Rated Load Amps 9.3 11.6 13.9 8.1 17.2 10.1 5.0 Locked Rotor Amps 50.0 53.0 65.0 53.0 82.0 67.5 33.8 Outdoor Fan Motor, DD, PSC (HP) .20 .20 .20 .20 .25 .25 .25 Full Load Amps 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.5 1.5 0.75 Indoor Blower Motor, DO, PSC (HP & Speeds) .33 & 2 .33 & 2 .33 & 2 .33 & 2 .50 & 2 .50 & 2 .50 & 2 Full Load Amps 3.6 3.6 3.5 3.5 4.2 4.5 2.0 Max Branch Circuit Fuse Size (Amps) PERFORMANCE DATA 25 30 35 35 40 40 40 Rated Cooling Capacity @95°F (Btuh)t 18,000 23,400 28,400 28,400 34,800 34,800 34,800 SEER-t- 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 EERt - - - 8.2 - 8.2 8.2 Rated Heating Capacity @47°F (Btuh)t 19,800 24,000 29,000 29,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 HSPF (Minimum-Region IV)t 6.60 6.40 7.50 7.50 6.00 6.00 6.00 COPt 3.0 3.0 1 3.0 1 3.0 1 3.0 1 3.0 1 3.0 ARI Sound Rating Number COMPRESSOR, REFRIGERANT,& CONTROLS 7.8 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 Compressor Type Hermetic Compressor Temp & Overcurrent Protection Standard (Internal Line Break) Compressor Internal Pressure Relief Valve Standard Compressor Vibration Isolators Standard Vapor-Tube Accumulator Standard Two-Way-Flow Refrigerant Metering Device Piston Low-Pressure Switch Standard Compressor Crankcase Heater Standard Compressor Quick-Start Components Standard-All Single-Phase Unit - Refrigerant Service Ports Standard Heat-Saving Reversing Valve Standard Time-Temperature Defrost System Standard R-22 Refrigerant Amount (Factory Charge) INDOOR COIL & BLOWER 7 Ibs-4 oz 7 lbs-7 oz 8 lbs-0 oz 8 Ibs-3 oz Coil Face Area (Sq Ft)-No. Circuits 3.4-3 3.4-3 4.3-4 4.3-4 5.0-4 5.0-4 5.0-4 Width x Height (In.) 25 x 20 25 x 20 31 x 20 31 x 20 31 x 23 31 x 23 31 x 23 Rows & Fins Per Inch 3&14 3&14 3&14 3&14 3&14 3&14 3&14 Blower Wheel Diameter x Width (In.) 10x6 12x6 12x6 12x6 12x6 12x6 12x6 Rated Cooling Airflow (Ft3/Min)t 700 900 1125 1125 1350 1350 1350 External Static Pressure (In. wc)t 0.10 0.10 0.15 0.13 0.15 0.15 0.15 Condensate Drain Connection (Hose) 1 3/4 OUTDOOR COIL & FAN 3/4 3/4 1 3/4 3/4 3/4 1 3/4 Coil Face Area (Sq Ft)-No. Circuits 8.8-3 8.8-3 8.8-4 1 8.8-4 10.3-5 1 10.3-5 1 10.3-5 Height & Width (In.) 20 x 63 20 x 63 20 x 63 20 x 63 23 x 63 23 x 63 23 x 63 Rows & Fins Per Inch 2&22 2&22 2&22 2&22 2&22 2&22 2&22 Fan Diameter (In.) STANDARD EQUIPMENT 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 Multi-Speed, Direct-Drive Blower Standard PSC Energy-Saving Blower Motor Standard Computer-Designed Refrigerant System Standard Insulated Blower Compartment Standard Low-Voltage Terminal Block Standard *Use only copper wire for field connections to the unit. Wire sizes are based on 60°C copper conductor at 86°F (30°C) ambient tem- perature and the ampacity shown in table. If other than 60°C copper conductor is used, if ambient temperature is above 86°F, or if voltage drop of wire exceeds 2% of unit total rated voltage, determine wire size from ampacity shown and the National Electrical Code. tRated in accordance with ARI Standard 240-81 and/or U.S. Government DOE test procedures. jRated in accordance with ARI Standard 270-84. HP91 SPECIFICATIONS-MODEL 542G-SIZES 042 THRU 060 MODEL 542G SIZE . !IIl:l[sf1 N042 j P042 _ E042 I N048 I P048 I- E048-1 N060 I P060 E060 Unit Volts-Phase (60Hz) - 208-230-1 208/230-3 460-3 208-230-1 208/230-3 460-3 - 208-230-1 208/230-3 460-3 Operating Voltage Range 187-253 187-253 1 414-506 187-253 187-253 414-506 187-253 187-253 414-506 Minimum Wire Size (AWG)* 8 10 14 8 10 14 6 8 12 Total Unit Amps 28.7 18.9 9.6 30.8 22.9 10.9 39.7 27.6 13.8 Compressor Rated Load Amps 22.1 13.7 6.9 - 23.9 16.0 8.0 - 30.2 20.5 10.3 Locked Rotor Amps 95.4 82.0 41.0 110.0 92.0 46.0 178.0 124.0 62.0 Outdoor Fan Motor, OD, PSC (HP) .25 1 .25 .50 .25 .25 1 .50 .50 .50 .50 Full Load Amps 2.1 2.1 1.2 2.4 2.4 1.2 2.8 2.8 1.4 Indoor Blower Motor, DD, PSC (HP & Speeds) .50 & 3 _50 & 3 .50 & 3 .50 & 3 .50 & 3 .50 & 3 .75 & 2 .75 & 2 .75 & 2 Full Load Amps 4.5 4.0 2.0 . 4.5 4.5 2.0 6.7 6.7 3.4 Max Branch Circuit Fuse Size (Amps) PERFORMANCE DATA - 50 30 15 - 60 40 20 - 60 45 25 Rated Cooling Capacity @ 95°F (Btuh)t 41,500 - 41,500 1 41,500 47,000 47,000 47,000 57,000 57,000 57,000 SEERt 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 8.6 8.6 8.6 EERt - - 8.0 8.0 - 8.4 8.4 - . - 7.5 7.5 Rated Heating Capacity @ 47°F (Btuh)t 42,000 42,000 42,000 47,500 47,500- 47,500 57,000 57,000 57,000 HSPF (Minimum-Region lV)t 6.2 6.2 6.2 5.54 5.54 5.54 . 6.0 6.0 . 6.0 COPt - 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 - 3.0 3.0 2.9 2.9 2.9 ARI Sound Rating Numberf REFRIGERANT, & 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.6COMPRESSOR, 8.2 il:t.I!.- 8.2 8.2 1 8.6 1 8.6 Compressor Type I - - , Hermetic - Compressor Temp & Overcurrent Protection Standard (InteranI Line Break) Compressor Internal Pressure Relief Valve . Standard Compressor Vibration Isolators Standard Vapor-Tube Accumulator - Standard Two-Way-Flow Refrigerant Metering Device Piston - Low-Pressure Switch - - Standard - Compressor Crankcase Heater Standard - Compressor Quick-Start Components Standard-All Single-Phase Units - -- Refrigerant Service Ports - Standard - Heat-Saving Reversing Valve . Standard Time-Temperature Defrost System Standard - R-22 Refrigerant Amount (Facto Char e 9 Ibs-0 oz lhDI.I.1: COIL ]i'IBLOWER o 9 lbs-6 oz 1 10 lbs-5 oz Coil Face Area (Sq Ft)-No. Circuits 7.3-7 7.3-7 7.3-7 7.3-7 7.3-7 7.3-7 8.3-7 8.3-7 8.3-7 Width x Height (In.) - - 37 x 28 37 x 28 37 x 28 37 x 28 37 x 28 37 x 28 37 x 31 37 x 31 37 x 31 Rows & Fins Per Inch 3&14 3&14 3&14 3&14 3&14 3&14 3&14 3&14 3&14 Blower Wheel Diameter x Width (ln.) . 12x6 12x6 12x6 12x6 12x6 12x6 12x6 12x6 12x6 Rated Cooling Airflow (Ft3/Min)t 1575 1575 1575 1700 1700 1700 2200 2200 2200 External Static Pressure (In. wc)t 0.20 0.20 . 0.20 . 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.25 0.25 . 0.25 Condensate Drain Connection (Hose) COIL & FAN 3/4 1 3/4 1 3/4 3/4 .OUTDOOR 3/4 3/4 3/4 3/4 3/4 Coil Face Area (Sq Ft)-No Circuits 12.0-5 1 12.0-5 - 12.0-5 1 12.0-5 1 12.0-5 1 12.0-5 14.0-6 14.0-6 14.0-6' Height & Width (In.) 27 x 63 1 27 x 63 1 27 x 63 27 x 63 27 x 63 27 x 63 31 x 63 31 x 63 31 x 63 Rows & Fins Per Inch 2&22 1 2&22 1 2&22 2&22 2&22 2&22 - 2&22 2&22 2&22 Fan Diameter (In.) EQUIPMENT 22 1 22 1 22 22 1 STANDARD 22 22 122 22 . 22 Multi-Speed, Direct-Drive Blower - . . - Standard - - - PSC Energy-Saving BlowerMotor - Standard Belt-Drive Blower Standard Two-Speed, Direct-Drive Outdoor Fant Standard PSC Energy-Saving Outdoor Fan Motor Standard Computer-Designed Refrigerant System . - Standard Insulated Blower Compartment - . Standard Low-Voltage Terminal Block Standard *Use only copper wire for field connections to the unit. Wire sizes are based on 60°C copper conductor at 86°F (30°C) ambient temperature and the ar1pacity shown in table. If other than 60°C copper conductor is used, if ambient temperature is above 86°F, or if voltage drop of wire exceeds 2% of unit total rated volt- age, determine wire size from ampacity shown and the National Electrical Code. tRated in accordance with ARI Standard 240-81 and/or U.S. Government DOE test procedures. - Rated in accordance with ARI Standard 270-84. - ELECTRIC HEAT ACCESSORY PRESSURE DROP (IN. WC.) Heater KW - CFM Ft3Min* 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 5-7.5-10 .020 .030 040 .045 .050 .055 .060 .070 1 .080 15-20-25 - - - - .050 .055 .060 .070 .080 90 100 *See table for minimum airflow required for safe heateroperation HP-92 542G ELECTRIC HEATER PACKAGES L. F. 1 Sizes Used With. .. Heater PIN VOLTSIPH . kW, - BRANCH CIRCUIT CAP. (1000 Btuh) Heate. Amos Minimum Circuit Ampacity - MOCP Am_ Stages* -. Elements Power Wire Set Ground Wire Size 018 thru. 060 - -. 309125-101 '' 208/1 • - 240/1 3.75 5.0 18.0 20.8 22.5 26.0 25 30 1 1 10 10 10 1 10 12.8 17.1 309125-102 5.6 7.5 27.0 31.3 33.8 39.1 3540 1 2 8 8 10 10 19225.6 309125-103 7.5 10.0 36.1 41.6 45.1 52.0 50 60 1_ 2 6 - - 10 - 10 25.6 34.1 030 thru 060 .309125-104 11.3 15.0 54.1 62.5 67.6 78.1 70 80 2 4 4 3 8 8 138.5 51.2 036 thru 060 .309125-105 15.0 20.0 72.1 83.3 90.1 104.2 100 .110 _2 4. 3f 4 8 6 51.2 68.2 060 309125-106 18.75 25.0 90.1 104.0 112.6 130.0 125 150. 3 .5 2f lt 6 6 64.0 85.4 030 thru 060 309126-101 208/3 - ., 240/3 7.5 10.0 20.8 1 24.0 26.01 30.0 -30 30 1 3 10 10 10 10 25.6 34.1 .309126-102 11.3 15.0 31.1 36.0 38.9 45.0 40 45 _2_ 3. 8 6 .10 10 38.5 51.2 042 thru 060 060 309126-103 .309126-104 15.0 20.0 41.5 1 48.0 51.9 60.0 -60 60 2 6 6 1 4 10 10 51.2 68.2 18.75 25.0 52.0 1 60.1 65.1 75.2 70 80 2 6 - 4 1 3 8 8 64.0 85.4 036 thru 060 309127-101 480/3 .. 10.0 12.0 15.0 '15 1 - 3 14 14 34.1 309127-102 15.0 . 18.0 22.5 25 2 6 10 10 51.2 309127-103 - 20.0 - 240 1 30.0 30 2' 6 1 10 10 68.2 060 309127-104 25.0 . 301 37.6 40 ' 2 1 6 8 .10 1 85.4 These heaters have circuit breaker overcurrent protection. *VA draw per stage is 6.2 : - , • - . . .. . MOCP-Maximum Overcurrent Current Protection (Fuses or Circuit Breaker) tWire size based on 60°C Copper conductors unless otherwise noted. . .• Wire Size based on 75°C Copper conductor. Note: Shaded portions are for 240V.' -, , - , .:.• -- .' - -. AIR DELIVERY (CFM) AT INDICATED EXTERNAL STATIC PRESSURE & VOLTAGE (SIZES 0187HRU 060) - 'Unit' Size Blower - ' Motor ' Speed - -Operating ' Voltage - Applica; tion - . External Static Pressure (inches water) - 0.0 - -0.1 0.2 - 0.3 ., . 0.4 - -• 0.5 0.6 0.7 . . 0.9 - 0.9 1.0 018 - . Low 230 , Heating - - - - - 800 -730 640 - - - Cooling . - - - - - 750 680 550 - - - High . Heating . - - . - - - ' -- ' 820 . 680 550 Cooling - -- - - - 785 685 575 - - - 024 • Low - 1 230 .- Heating 1450 1410 1375 1 1320. 1345, 1175 1090 1 .-985 850 760 Cooling 1390 1340 1290 1225 1165 1105 1020 915 740 - - High ' ________ .Heating 1500 .1475 1435 1390 1335 1260 1180 .1090 980 '840 - Cooling 1 1460 1405 1350 1295 1255 1190 .1110 1020 670 - 030 - - - Low, . . - . • 230 - - - - - Heating - - 1425 1360 1295 1235 --1160 1080 995 925 815 Cooling . - - 1380 1315 1250 1190' .1125 1045 960 895 790 -High -Heating - ' - - '-1500 1425 1345%-1 1275 1 1190 -1120 - 1020 - 935 -830 Cooling - - 1450 1 1375 1295 1230 1145 1080 985 905 805 036 Low - 230 460 - ' , Heating - - 1440 1 1400 1245 1290 1225 1140 1040 930 Cooling - -- 1400 1365 1290. 1240 1185 1090 990 890 - High Heating - - 1500 1460 1410- .1345 1270 1195 1075 930 Cooling - - - 1465 1430 1365 1300 1230 1145 1020 - 890 -, 042 048 - Low 230 460 Heating 1850 1810 1770 1725 1685 1640 1600 1535 1480 1410 1345 Cooling 1820 1775 1730 1695 1650 1610 1555 1500 1440 1385 1320 Medium' Heating 1960 1915 1885 1830 1780 1725 1655 1600 1540, 1470 1400 Cooling 1895 1880 1850 1795 1745 1690 1620 1565 1510 1445 1375 High Heating 2230 2160 2120 2070 2010 1950 1890 1820 1750 1675 1590 Cooling 2145 2105 2060 2000 1940 1880 1820 1750 1690 1615 1540 060 Low 230 460 Heating 2395 2365 2335 2290 2245 2205 2150 2100 2050 2000 1915 Cooling 2375 2325 2295 2250 2225 2180 2135 2070 2020 1960 1875 ~~g Heating 2570 2525 2470 2425 2370 2335 2265 2220 2160 2100 2030 Cooling 2550 2485 2435 2385 2345 -2310 2235 2190 2130 2075 2000 NOTES: Air delivery values are based on 230 or 460 unit operating voltage without air filter or optional electric heaters. Deduct field supplied air filter and electric heater pressure drop to obtain external static pressure available forducting. Dashes indicate portions of the table that are beyond the blower motor capacity. See table for minimum airflow required for field installed electric heaters. Do not operate unit at'a cooling airflow that is less than 350 Ft3/min. per each 1200 Btuh of rated cooling capacity. Indoor coil icing may occur at airflows below this point: - I. MINIMUM AIRFLOW (Ft 3!Min) FOR SAFE ELECTRIC HEATER OPERATION - Heat Pump Size 018 1 024 030 036 . 042 1 048 1 060 600 1 875 875 1 1300 1 1400 1 1700 1 1800 HP-93 . - DETAILED COOLING CAPACITIES-MODEL 542G; SIZES 018,024, & 030 Indoor OUTDOOR COIL ENTERING AIR TEMPERATURES(OF) 85 95 105 115 Coil Air Ft3 Capacity Total Capacity Total Capacity Total Capacity Total per OF MBtuh System MBtuh System MBtuh System MBtuh System Total I Sens Total I Sens Total I Sens Total I Sens Min WB KW KW KW KW 542G018 72 20.3 9.63 1.96 19.1 9.12 2.10 17.7 8.51 2.23 16.1 7.85 2.35 67 19.2 12.2 1.93 17.8 11.5 2.05 16.2 10.7 2.17 14:6 9.81 2.28 525 62 17.7 14.6 1.89 16.0 13.6 2.01 14.5 12.6 2.11 13.0 . 11.6 2.20 57 16.2 16.2 1.85 14.9 14.9 1.96 13.6 13.6 2.06 12.3 12.3 2.16 72 20.3 9.92 2.01 19.5 9.64 2.16 18.2 9.14 2.30 16.7 8.51 2.43 67 19.7 13.2 1.99 18.5 12.7 2.13 16.9 11.9 2.25 15.2 11.1 2.37 675 62 18.6 16.4 1.96 17.0 15.5 2.09 15.2 14.3 2.20 13.7 13.2 2.29 57 17.8 17.8 1.95 16.3 16.3 2.06 14.9 14.9 2.18 13.5 13.5 2.28 72 20.3 10.0 2.04 19.5 9.82 2.19 18.4 9.42 2.34 16.8 8.81 2.46 67 19.7 13.5 2.01 18.7 13.2 2.16 17.2 12.5 2.29 15.4 11.6 2.40 750 62 18.8 17.1 1.99 17.3 16.3 2.12 15.6 15.1 2.23 14.0 13.9 2.34 57 18.3 18.3 1.98 16.9 16.9 2.11 15.4 15.4 2.22 13.9 13.9 2.33 542G024 72 27.7 13.5 2.58 25.6 12.6 2.74 23.4 11.7 2.89 21.3 10.9 3.03 67 24.9 16.7 2.51 22.9 15.8 2.66 20.9 14.8 2.80 19.0 13.9 2.93 700 62 22.3 19.8 2.44 20.4 18.7 2.58 18.6 17.6 2.71 17.0 16.5 2.84 57 21.1 21.1 2.42 19.6 19.6 2.56 18.2 18.2 2.69 16.7 16.7 2.83 72 28.7 14.6 2.68 26.5 13.7 2.86 24.2 12.8 3.00 22.0 12.0 3.14 67 25.9 18.7 2.62 23.8 17.7 2.77 21.7 16.7 2.91 19.7 15.7 3.04 900 62 23.4 22.5 2.56 21.5 21.2 2.70 19.7 19.7 2.84 18.1 18.1 2.97 57 23.0 1 23.0 2.55 1 21.3 21.3 2.69 1 19.7 19.7 1 2.84 18.1 1 18.1 2.97 72 29.0 15.1 2.73 26.8 14.3 2.91 24.5 13.3 3.06 22.2 12.5 3.20 67 26.3 19.7 2.68 24.1 18.6 2.82 22.0 17.6 2.96 19.9 16.5 3.09 1000 62 23.9 23.6 2.61 22.1 22.0 2.76 20.3 20.3 2.90 18.6 18.6 3.04 57 23.8 23.8 2.61 22.0 22.0 2.76 20.3 20.3 2.90 18.6 18.6 3.04 542G030 72 33.3 16.5 3.22 31.2 15.8 3.45 29.2 15.0 3.68 27.0 14.2 3.90 67 29.9 20.7 3.11 28.0 19.9 3.33 26.1 19.1 3.55 24.2 18.3 3.76 875 62 26.8 24.6 3.02 25.1 23.7 3.23 23.5 22.8 3.43 21.9 21.8 3.64 57 25.8 25.8 2.99 24.5 24.5 3.23 23.1 23.1 3.42 21.8 21.8 3.64 72 . 34.4 17.9 3.33 32.2 17.1 3.57 30.0 16.4 3.80 27.9 15.6 4.03 67 31.0 23.0 3.23 29.0 22.2 3.45 26.9 21.4 3.67 24.9 20.6 3.88 1100 62 28.1 27.5 3.14 26.3 26.3 3.36 24.8 24.8 3.58 23.3 23.3 3.80 57 27.8 27.8 3.13 26.3 26.3 3.36 24.8 24.8 3.58 23.3 23.3 3.80 72 34.9 18.7 3.41 32.6 18.0 3.64 30.4 17.2 3.87 28.2 16.4 4.10 -. 67 31.5 24.4 3.30 29.4 23.6 3.52 27.3 22.7 3.74 25.2 21.9 3.95 1250 62 28.9 28.9 3.22 27.3 27.3 3.45 25.7 - 25.7 3.67 24.1 24.1 3.90 57 28.8 28.8 1 3.22 27.3 27.3 3.45 1 25.7 25.7 3.67 24.1 1 24.1 1 3.90 NOTES: lTotal and sensible capacities are net capacities. Blower motor heat has been subtracted. 2.Sensible heat capacities shown are based on 80°F entering air at the indoor coil. For sensible capacities at other than 80°F, deduct 850 Btuh per 1000 ft3lmin of indoor coil air for each degree below 80°F, or add 850 Btuh per 1000 ft3/min of indoor coil air per degree above 80°F. 3.Total system KW includes compressor KW, outdoor fan motor KW, and indoor blower motor KW. [I 12 HP•94 S DETAILED HEATING CAPACITIES-MODEL 542G; SIZES 642,048,'& 060: - -.-- .--- --.--.. .-... - •-- Outdoor' Coil Air' instantaneous Capacity (MBtuh) - Integrated Capacity (MBtuh) Total - - Power Input (KW) instantaneous. Capacity '- (MBtuh)t - - integrated Capacity (MBtuh) Total Power - input (KW) Instantaneous Capacity (MBtuh) Integrated Capacity (MBtuh) Total Power ' input (KW) ,Temp --- i - Indoor Coil Air Temp (°F EDB) i - - ' Indoor Coil Air Temp (°F EDB) - -.Indoor Coil Air Temp (°F EDB) (°FEDB) 60 170 I 80 I 60I 70 I 80 60 170 I 80 60.170 I 60 -1 60:1 70.1 80460 70 I.80 60.1.70.1.80 60 I 70.1.80] 60.1 Size Indoor Coil Airflow (Ft 1Mm) - - Indoor Coil Airflow (Ft 1Mm) ... . - - Indoor Coil Airflow (Ft 1Mm) 042. 1225 -' - .. - 1575.... .1750 60 - 50_r 45.4 43.8 41.8 45.4 4.38 41.8 4.05 4.28 4.51 46.3 44.4 43.5 46.3 44.4 43.5 4.04 4.26 4.53 46.7 44.9 43.9 46.7 [44.9 43.9 4.07 4.29 4.55 --47 43.8 41.9 39.9 438 41.9 39.9 4.00 4.23 4.42 44.7 43.5 41.5 44.7 43.5 41.5 4.00 4.25 4.45 44.8 43.7-141.8 44.8 [47 41.8 4.01 4.26 4.4 -40 38.1 36.3 34.5 38.1 36.3 34.5 3.78 3.97 4.15 39.6 378 35.9 39.6 37.8 35.9 3.84 4.04 4.22 40.0 38.4 36.5 40.0 38.4136.5 3.87 4.08 4.2 30 31.3 29.8 28.1 27.4 26.1 24.7 3.513.67 3.82 32.6 31.0 29.4 28.5 27.1 125.7 3.59 3.76 3.92 33.131.529.929.07i26.2 3.643.823.9 20 25.5 24.0 22.2 23.1 21.8 20.2 3.26 3.39 3.52 26.5 25.1 23.4 24.1 22.8 21.2 3.36 3.51 3.64 27.0 25.5 23.9 24.5 21.6 17 23.8 22.4 20.6 21.7 20.4 18.8 3.18 3.31 3.44 24.8 23.4 21.7 22.6 21.3 19.8 3.29 3.43 3.56 25.2 23.8 22.1 23.0 21.7 2.2. 3.36 3.50 3.6 610 20.2 18.6 I 16.8 18.5 17.1 15.5 3.01 3.13 3.23 21.1 119.6 17.8 19.4 18.0 16.4 3.14 3.26 3.37 21.5 20.0 18.2 19.7 {1 16.7 3.21 3.33 3.4 * - 0 - 15.3 13.8 12.0 14.1 12.7 11.1 2.78 2.88 2.96 16.2 14.6 12.8 14.9 13.4 11.8 2.93 3.02 2.86 16.5 15.0 13.2 15.2 13.8 12.0 3.00 3.10 3.18 --10 1.1 9.50 7.74 10.2 8.74 7.12 2.58 2.64 2.70 11.8 10.2 8.39 10.8 9.38 7.72 2.73 2.80 2.8 12.1 10.5 8.68 11.1 9.66 7.99 2.80 2.87- 2.9 Size - - Indoor Coil Airflow (Ft /Min) - - - . ,- indoor Coil Airflow (Ft /Min) - indoor Coil Airflow (F I in) - - 048 - 1400 . -- ... 1650...,.. 2000 6057.5 . 5511527 57'S 551 527 E4 ST i 590 56fii 514 55ë 592 581 556T 4.94 5.19 50 - .-48.7 146.4 51.0 48.7 46.4 E4.48 4.71 4.93 52.3 50.0 47.7 52.3 50.ö]47.7 4.50 4.74 4.96 53.1 51.4 49.1 53.1 51.4 49.1J4.53 4.81 5.0 49.0 46.8 44.6 r4.43 4.66 4.87 50.2 48.0 45.8 50.2 48.ô]45.8 4.9 41.0 4.46 4.69 4.91 51.2 49.4 47.1 51.2 49.4 47.1T4.51 4.77 139.1 43.0 41.0 39.1 L4.25 4.46 4.66 44.1 42.1 40.1 44.1 42.fl40.1 4.8 4.30 4.51 4.71 45.3 43.3 41.3 45.3 43.3 41.3J4.39 4.61 31.7 30.2 28.6 L4.05 4.24 4.4 37.0 35.3 33.5 32.5 30.fl.4 4.64 28.6 4.12 4.31 4.48 38.1 36.3 34.6 33.4 31.8 30,314.23 4.43. K 47 46.8144.6 26.8 27.3 25.9 24.3 ft 4.02 4. 30.8 29.3 27.6 28.0 26.6 4.4 26.9 15.O 3.95 4.11 4.25 31.8 30.3 28.6 28.9 27.4 25.91409 4.25 25.0 25.9 24.5 22.8 3.96 4.0 29.1 27.6 25.8 26.5 25.2 4.3 23.0 1T3.6 3.90 4.05 4.18 30.0 28.5 26.8 27.3 26.0 24.4[4 4.19 19.3 jä 3.80 3.9 25.3 23.7 21.8 23.2 21.7 [ö.o 3.78 3.91 4.02 26.1 24.6 22.7 23.9 22.5 20.8 [1 4.0614.18 Q21.O22.621.1 16.3 14.4 3.49 3.59 3.67 20.1 18.3 16.3 18.5 3.8713.96 -10 16.9 fl.o 3.60 3.70 3.79 20.9 19.1 17.1 19.2 17.6 15.7 12.9 11.8 9,88 3.30 3.36 3.4 15.3 13.4 11.3 [iö Size 14.1 12.3 0.4 3.42 3.49 3.55 16.0 14.1 12.0 14.7 13.0 11.0 Airflow Fti in - - - - Indoor Coil Airflow (Ft /Min) ... - - Indoor Coil Airflow (FtiMi - - .060 - 1750 - • - .. . - .. - 2250 .-.... - 2500 ' . - 60 85.1,j -50 .1 60.5 57.8 63.1 57.8 5.6 5.85 .0 65.5 62.9 60.2 65.5 162.9 60.2 5.71 5.95 .20 66.0 63.8 61.1 66.0 63.8 61.1 602 6.27 47 - .7 58.2 55.7 60.7 55.7 .56 5.80 - 63.1 60.5 57.9 63.1 160.5 57.9 5.67 5.91 6.15 64.0 61.4 58.8 64.0 61.4 58.8 5.99 6. 40 .5 51.2 7.067.965.?TO [27.1 4ts.9 53.5 4.9 .35 5.57 .79 55.6 53.2 50.9 55.6 53.2 50.9 5.48 5.71 .94 56.4 54.1 51.7 56.4 54.1 51.7 580 6.02 30 .3 43.3 41.3 39.7 36.2 .12 5.32 .52 47.0 45.0 43.0 41.2 139.4 37.6 5.29 5.50 .70 47.7 45.7 43.7 41.8 40.0 38.3 iä 5.60 .80 --20 - .1-36.334334.53l,2 .2 i35.9I35.132.öô5.4740.239.236.636.535.633.25.215.41 5.58 -17 .9 34.2 22.2 32.7 29.3 4.83 5.01 .17 37.3 35.6 33.7 34.0 132.5 30.7 5.04 5.22 5.39 37.9 36.2 34.3 34.8 33.0 31.3 5.15 5.33 5.50 10 .4 29.8 27.5 28.8 25.2 4.68 4.84 14.99 132.7 131.0 128.9 130.0T.4 26.5 14.91 5.07 5.22 33.3 31.6 29.5 30.5 29.0 27.1 5.03 5.19 5.35 0 • .3 23.4 21.2 23.3 21.5 19.5 4.47 4.60 4.73 26.6 24.6 22.5 124.4 122.7 20.7 4.72 4.86 .99 27.1 25.2 23.0 24.9 23.2 21.2 4.85 4.99 5.13 ELECTRICAL CONTROLS ACCESS PANEL DISCONNECTS PER NEC * EVAPORATOR FAN (UNIT AND ACCESS PANEL ELECTRIC "\"CONDENSATE HEATER) -POWER WIRING -CONTROL WIRING \ DRAIN TRAP )CONDENSER AIRFLOW - EVAPORATOR AIRFLOW PAD A86101 'Separate disconnect per NEC required for electric heater. .6 116.2114.1 14.26 14.37 14.47 120.8 118.8 116.4 l 4.F87 14.89 - IU 2111 15.1 4.54 4.65 475 21. 19.5 170 19.6 17.7 15.6 - - - - .. - - NOTES:-• - . - - - - - • - .-. 1.Instantaneous heating capacity values shown include indoor blower motor heat. These values ignore the effect of outdoor coil frost buildup. ,2.lntegrated heating capacity values shown are net values to which indoor blower motor heat has been added and from which the defrost effect has been subtracted. lo obtain total system heating capacities, add the heating capacity of the supplemental electric heaters to the ,iitegrated + capacities. -1 . .. . . . - - -. . - F • - - 3 Total power Input values Include the compressor, outdoor fan and indoor blower motors. . - . t . - - - - ).'• - ,_ -- . - S. - S - •5 - 5.- - .5 5, - -' - • . ' - ., -. . ...- ------- II: .. 1I RETURN AIR FROM POWER POWER - SOURCE Z DETAILED HEATING CAPACITIES -Model 542G; Sizes 018,024,030,'& 036 . Outdoor Coil Air • Instantaneous Capacity (MBtuh) . Integrated Capacity (MBtuh) Total Power Input (KW) . Instantaneous Capacity (MBtuh) Integrated CapacIty (MBtuh) Total Power Input i (KW) Instantaneous Capacity (MBtuh) Integrated Capacity (MBtuh) Total Power Input (KW) Temp Indoor Coil Air Temp (°F EDB) Indoor Coll Air Temp (°F EDB). - Indoor Coil Air Temp (°F EDB) - (OF EDB) 60170180 60l70l80 J 60 170180 60170180160170 l80J 60170180 60170180.1 60170180 7080 J60 Size indoor Coil Airflow (Ft 1Mm) Indoor Coil Airflow (Ft '/Min) indoor Coil Airflow (Ft 1Mm) 018 525 - 675 750 .60 24.6 23.6 22 24.6 23.6 22.5 2.02 12.11 2.20 25.3 24.4 23.4 125.3 24.4 23.4 12.03 12.11 2.20 25.5 24.7 23.6 25.5 124.7 123.6 2.04 2.12 2.21 50 21.1 20.1 19.2 21.1 20.1 19.2 1.89 1.97 2.05 21.8 20.9 19.9 121.8 20.9 19.9 1.90 1.98 2.06 22.0 21.1 20.2 122.0 21.1 120.2 1.92 1.99 2.07 47 20.0 19.1 18.2 20.0 19.1 18.2 1.85 1.93 2.00 20.7 19.8 18.9L20.7 19.8 18.9 1.86 1.94 2.02 21.0 20.1 19.1 21.0 20.1 19.1. 1.88 1.95 2.03 40 17.7 16.8 16.0 11.7 16.8 16.0 1.76 1.83 1.90 18.3 17.4 16.6 18.3 17.4 16.6 1.78 1.85 1.92 18.5 17.7 16.8 18.5 17.7 16.8 1.79 1.87 1.94 30 14.6 13.9 13.1 12.8 12.2 11.5 1.65 1.71 1.77 15.2 14.4 13.6 13.3 12.6 12.0 1.68 1.74 1.80 15.4 14.6 13.9 13.5 12.8 12.1 1.69 1.76 1.82 20 12.0 11.3 10.6 10.9 10.3 9.66 1.55 1.60 1.65 12.4 11.7 11.1 11.2 10.6 10.0 1.58 1.64 1.69 12.6 11.9 11.2 11.4 10.8 10.2 1.60 1.66 1.71 17 11.2 10.6 9.96 10.2 9.66 9.08 1.52 1.57 1.62 11.6 11.0 10.4 10.6 10.0 9.44 1.56 1.61 1.66 11.8 11.2 10.5 10.8 10.2 9.59 1.58 1.63 1.68 10 . 9.63 9.04 8.44 8.84 8.30 7.75 1.46 1.50 1.54 10.0 9.40 8.80 11.18 8.63 8.08 1.50 1.54 1.5 10.2 9.55 8.95 9.32 8.77 8.22 1.52 1.57 1.61 0 1.61 7.06 6.40 7.01 6.50 5.89 1.37 1.40 1.43 7.43 7.39 6.74 7.29 6.80 6.20 1.42 1.45 1.4 8.06 7.52 6.88 7.41 6.92 6.33 1.44 1.48 1.51 -10 5.82 5.21 4.53 5.36 4.80 4.17 1.29 1.31 1.33 6.11 5.50 4.82 5.62 5.06 4.43 1.34 1.36 1.3 6.23 5.63 4.94 5.73 5.18 4.55 1.37 1.39 1.41 Size Indoor Coil Airflow (Ft 1Mm) Indoor Coil Airflow (Ft 1Mm) indoor Coil Airflow (Ft /Min) 024 - - . 700 900 - 1000 60 30.0 28.7 27.7 30.0 28.7 127.7 f2.46 2.59 2.74 31.1 129.8 28.6 31.1 129.8 28.6 2.45 2.58 2.72 31.4 30.2 29.0T31.4 30.2 29.012.45 2.59 2.721 50 26.2 25.0 23.9 26.2 25.0 23.9 2.33 2.46 2.58 27.1 126.0 24.8 127.1 126.0 24.8 2.33 2.46 2.58 27.5 26.3 25.2F27.5 26.3 25.24 2.47 2.59 47 25.0 23.9 22.8 25.0 23.9 22.8 2.29 2.42 2.53 26.0 24.8 23.7 26.0 24.8 23.7 2.30 2.42 2.54 26.3 25.2 24.0[26.3 25.2 24.01 2.43 2.56 40 21.9 20.9 20.0 21.9 20.9 20.0 2.18 2.30 2.40 22.7 21.7 20.7J.J7 20.7 2.20 2.31 2.43 23.0 22.0 21.0T23.0 22.0 21.0 fti 2.33 2.45 30 1 18.2 17.3 16.5 15.9 15.2 14.5 2.05 2.16 2.26 18.8 18.0 17.J1.f18 15.0 2.08 2.19 2.29 19.1 18.2 17.4 16.7 16.0 15.20 2.21 2.31 20 15.0 14.2 13.5 13.6 12.9 12.2 1.94 2.03 2.11 15.5 14.8 14.0J14.1 13.4 12.7 1.98 2.07 2.16 15.7 15.0 141f14.3 13.6 12.9 2.01 2.10 2.19 17 14.1 13.4 12.7 12.9 12.2 11.6 1.99 .07 14.6 13.9 13.2J13.3 12.7 12.0 1.95 .04 2. 14.8 14.1 13.4J13.5 12.9 12.2 [118 2.07 2.15 10 12.2 11.5 10.8 11.2 10.6 19.95 [183 1.90 1.97 12.6 12.0 111.3 [11.6 111.0 10.4 1.88 11.96 12.03 12.8 12.1 111.5111.7 11.2 10.5 [1.92 1.99 2.06 0 9.68 19.04 18.28 18.91 18.32 17.62 [1.73 11.78 11.84 10.1 9.45 18.70 19.26 18.70 8.01 11.79 11.85 1.90 10.2 19.63 18.88 19.42 18.86 8.17 [.82 1.88 1.94 -10 7.44 16.75 15.98 16.85 16.21 15.50 1.62 11.67 11.71 7.80 7.11 16.34 17.18 16.55 5.84 1.69 11.74 11.78 7.96 17.28 16.51 17.32 16.70 599J!3 1.78 1.82 Size • Indoor Coil Airflow (Ft/Min) indoor Coil Airflow (Ft 1Mm) . Indoor Coil Airflow (Ft - - - 1Mm) 030 875 1100 . 1250 60 35.7 34.2 32.8 35.7 34.2 132.8 12.92 13.08 3.24 36.7 35.2 33.8 136.7 135.2 33.8 12.91 3.06 3.22 37.2 35.8 34.3 37.2 35.8134.3 .92 3.07 50 31.2 29.8 28.5 31.2 29.8 28.5 2.77 2.92 3.07 32.1 30.7 29.4 132.1 130.7 29.4 2.77 2.91 3.06 32.5 31.2 29.9 32.5 31.2 29.69 2.78 2.93 3.08 47 29.8 28.5 27.2 29.85 28.5 27.2 2.72 2.87 3.01 30.7 29.4 28.1 30.7 29.4 28.1 2.72 2.87 3.02 31.2 29.8 28.5 31.2 29.8 28.5 2.74 2.89 3.03 40 25.9 24.8 23.7 25.9 24.8 23.7 2.58 2.72 2.85 26.7 25.5 24.4 26.7 25.5 24.41259 2.73 2.86 27.1 25.9 24.8 27.1 25.9 24.8 2.61 2.75 2.88 30 21.5 20.5 19.5 18.8 17.9 17.1 2.42 2.54 2.66 22.1 21.1 20.1 19.4 18.5 17.6 2.44 2.57 2.69 22.4 21.4 20.4 19.7 18.8 17.9 2.47 2.59 2.72 20 17.6 16.7 15.9 16.0 15.2 14.4 2.28 2.38 2.48 18.2 17.3 16.4 16.5 15.7 14.9 2.31 2.42 2.53 18.4 17.5 16.7 16.7 15.9J15.1 2.35 2.46 2.56 - 17 16.5 15.7 14.9 15.1 14.3 13.6 2.24 2.34 2.43 17.0 16.2 15.4 15.5 14.8 14.0 2.28 2.38 2.48 17.3 16.5 15.6 15.8 15.0I[14.3 2.31 2.41 2.51 10 14.2 113.5 112.7 113.0 12.4 11.6 2.14 2.23 2.31 14.6 13.9 13.1 13.4 12.7 12.0 2.19 2.28 2.37 14.9 14.1 113.4 j 13.6 13.0 12.3 2.23 2.32 2.41 0 11.2 110.5 19.69 110.3 19.69 1131.91 12.01 2.08 2.14 11.6 110.9 110.1 110.7 110.0 9.28 12.07 12.14 12.21 11.8 11.1 110.3 110.9 110.2 19.49 2.11 2.18 2.25 -10 8.62 17.85 17.00 17.93 17.22 16.44 1.88 1.94 1.99 8.96 18.19 17.34 18.24 17.53 6.75 11.95 12.00 12.0 9.15 8.39 17.54 18.42 17.72 16.93 1.99 12.05 12.10 Size Indoor Coil AIrflow (Ft 1Mm) indoor Coil Airflow. (Ft 1Mm) indoor Coil Airflow (F /Min) 036 - - 1050 . . - 1300 - - 1500 60 43.6 41.9 40.2 43.6 41.9 40.2 f6 3.77 3.97 45.0 43.2 41.5 45.0 43.2 413.53 3.75 3.97 45.8 44.0 142.2 145.8 44.0 42.2 3.55 3.76 3.98 50 38.2 36.7 35.1 38.2 36.7 35.1 3.39 3.58 3.81 47 36.6 35.1 33.6 36.6 35.1 33.6 3.34 3.53 .7137.836.2j34.637.836.2ifl.343.543. 38.536.935.338.536.935.33.373.57 3.76 40 31.9 30.6 29.2 31.9 30.6 29.2 ft7 3.35 .52 32.9 31.5 130.2 32.9 31.5 20 3.38 3.55 33.5 32.1 30.8 33.5 32.1 30.8 3.23 3.42 3.591 30 26.6 25.4 24.3 23.3 22.2 21.2 2.99 3.14 .29 27.3 26.2 25.0 24.0 22.9 21.9 3.03 3.19 3.34 27.9 26.7 25.5 24.4 23.4 22.4 3.08 3.24 3.401 20 21.9 20.9 19.8 19.8 18.9 17.9 2.82 2.95 .o722.621!j20.920.519.5Ti[2.883.013.1423.O22.020.9 -2o.919.919.02.943.08 3*20 17 20.5 19.6 18.5 18.7 17.9 16.9 2.76 2.89 .0021.120Ti.219.318.41J.832.963.0821.620.619.619.718.817.92.893.02 1 10 17.716.715.616.315.414.3{ë52.752.86 118.3173J16.216.815.914.732.842.9418.717.716.617.116.315.32.792.91 3.01 0 14.0 12.9 11.8 12.9 11.9 10.8 2.49 2.57 2.66114.51Z-5 12.3 113.4 112.4 11.3 2.57 2.66 2.75 14.9 113.8 112.7 113.7 112.7 111.7 2.65 2.74 2.83 -10 110.6 19.57 18.41 19.77 18.81 17.74 12.33 12.40 12.46111.1 1100{8.86 110.2 19.23 8.15 12.43 12.50 12.57 111.4 110.4 19.18 110.5 19.53 18.45 2.51 2.58 2.66 NOTES: 1.lnstantaneous heating capacity values shown include Indoor blower motor heat. These values ignore the effect of outdoor coil frost buildup. 2.mntegrated heating capacity values shown are net values to which Indoor blower motor heat has been added and from which the defrost effect has been subtracted. To obtain total system heating capacities, add the heating capacity of the supplemental electric heaters to the Integrated capacities. 3.Total power input values Include the compressor, outdoor fan, and indoor blower motors. HP-96 I DETAILED COOLING CAPACITIES-MODEL 542G; SIZES 036 THRU 060 Indoor OUTDOOR COIL ENTERING AIR TEMPERATURES(OF) Coil Air 85 95 105 115 F13 Capacity Total Capacity Total Capacity Total Capacity Total per MBtuh System MBtuh System MBtuh System MBtuh System Total I Sons Total I Sons Total I Sons Total I Sons Min WB KW KW KW KW 5426038 72 40.6 20.1 3.87 38.2 19.2 4.17 35.8 18.4 4.46 33.3 17.5 4.74 67 36.7 25.4 3:76 34.4 24.4 4.03 32.2 23.5 4.30 30.0 22.7 4.56 1050 62 33.1 30.4 ;3.65 31.0 29.3 3.91 29.0 28.2 4.16 27.1 27.0 4.42 57 31.8 31.8 3.61 30.2 30.2 3.88 28.6 28.6 4.15 27.1 27.1 4.41 72 41.7 21.6 4.00 39.3 20.8 4.31 36.7 19.9 4.60 34.1 19.0 4.88 87 37.8 28.0 3.89 35.4 27.0 4.17 33.0 26.1 4.44 30.7 25.2 4.70 1300 62 34.4 33.6 3.79 32.4 32.3 4.06 30.6 30.6 4.33 28.8 28.8 4.60 57 34.1 34.1 3.78 32.3 1 32.3 4.05 30.5 30.5 4.33 28.8 28.8 4.60 72 42.4 22.7 4.09 4.41 37.3 21.1 4.71 34.7 20.2 38.6. 30.0 3.99 36.1 481 1500 4.99 67 4.27 33.7 28.1 4.54 31.3 272 62 35.4 35.4 3.90 40.1L22.0 33.4 4.18 31.8 31.8 4.48 35.7 35.7 3.90 33.8 30.0 57 4.18 32.0 32.0 4.47 29.8 29.8 4.76 542G042 72 47.7 23.3 4.80 44.4 22.1 5.04 40.4 20.4 5.23 36.4 18.8 5.39 67 44.6 30.3 4.69 41.1 28.7 4.90 37.6 27.1 5.10 33.9 25.3 5.27 1225 62 40.9 38.9 4.56 37.6 34.9 4.75 34.3 32.9 4.94 30.8 30.6 5.11 57 39.5 39.5 4.51 36.4 36.4 4.70 33.6 33.6 4.91 30.6 30.6 5.10 72 49.0 25.0 5.04 45.4 23.7 5.27 41.2 22.0 5.45 37.1 20.3 5.62 67 45.5 33.3 4.91 420 31.7 5.12 38.4 30.1 5.32 34.6 28.3 5.49 1575 62 423 41.0 4.79 39.0 38.7 4.99 35.9 35.9 5.20 32.8 32.8 5.40 57 42.0 42.0 1 4.78 . 38.9 1 38.9 4.99 1 36.0 36.0 5.20 1 32.9 32.9 5.40 72 49.2 25.6 5.14 44.7 23.8 5.33 41.4 22.7 5.55 37.3 21.0 5.72 67 45.8 34.6 5.01 42.2 33.1 5.22 38.6 31.5 5.42 34.8 29.5 5.58 1750 62 42.8 42.4 4.90 39.6 39.6 5.11 36.6 36.6 5.32 33.6 33.6 5.52 57 42.8 42.8 4.90 39.8 39.8 5.12 36.8 36.8 5.33 33.5 33.5 5.52 5426048 72 54.0 26.7 5.26 51.9 26.1 5.66 49.5 25.4 6.06 46.8 24.6 6.46 67 49.3 34.2 5.10 47.1 33.6 5.48 44.6 32.8 5.84 41.9 32.1 6.19 1400 62 44.6 41.1 4.93 42.5 40.4 5.28 40.3 39.5 5.63 38.2 38.1 5.98 57 43.2 43.2 4.88 41.7 41.7 5.24 39.9 39.9 5.61 38.1 38.1 5.97 72 55.1 28.1 5.42 52.9 27.6 5.83 50.4 26.9 6.24 47.5 26.2 6.64 67 50.4 36.9 5.27 48.0 36.3 5.65 45.4 35.5 6.01 42.6 34.7 6.37 1650 62 45.9 44.5 5.11 43.8 43.5 5.47 41.8 41.8 5.84 39.8 39.8 6.21 57 45.3 45.3 1 5.09 43.6 1 43.6 5.46 1 41.8. 41.8 5.84 1 39.9 39.9 6.21 72 56.0 30.0 5.64 53.4 29.3 6.03 50.9 28.8 6.45 48.1 28.2 6.85 67 51.4 40.3 5.48 48.9 39.7 5.87 46.1 39.0 6.24 43.3 38.2 6.60 2000 62 47.6 47.6 5.36 45.8 45.8 5.74 . 43.8 43.8 6.13 41.7 41.7 6.51 57 47.7 47.7 5.36 45.8 45.8 5.74 43.8 43.8 6.13 41.7 41.7 6.51 5426060 72 66.6 32.7 7.20 63.1 31.5 . 7.56 59.5 30.3 7.92 55.9 29.2 8.26 67 60.2 41.7 6.88 57.0 40.5 7.22 53.6 39.3 7.56 49.9 38.0 7.89 1750 62 54.5 50.2 6.59 51.6 48.9 6.91 48.5 47.4 7.24 . 44.9 44.9 7.60 57 52.6 526 6.50 50.5 50.5 6.85 47.9 47.9 7.22 44.8 44.8 7.60 72 68.0 . .. 35.3 7.54 64.5 34.2 7.92 60.7 33.0 8.27 57.0 31.9 8.63 67 61.9 46.6 7.26 58.5 45.5 7.60 54.9 44.3 7.94 51.2 43.0 8.26 2250 62 56.8 56.2 6.99 54.0 54.0 7.34 51.3 51.3 7.71 48.2 48.2 8.09 57 56.5 56.5 1 6.98 54.0 1 54.0 7.34 51.3 51.3 7.71 48.1 48.1 1 8.09 72 68.4 36.4 7.71 64.8 35.3 8.07 61.1 34.3 8.45 57.2 33.2 8.80 67 625 48.9 7.43 58.8 47.7 7.78 55.3 46.5 8.11 51.6 45.2 8.44 2500 62 57.9 57.9 7.20 55.3 55.3 7.56 52.5 52.5 794 49.4 49.4 8.31 57 57.9 57.9 7.19 55.3 55.3 7.56 52.5 52.5 7.93 49.4 49.4 8.31 NOTES: 1.Total and sensible capacities are net capacities. Blower motor heat has been subtracted. 2.Sensible heat capacities shown are based on 80°F entering air at the indoor coil. For sensible capacities at other than 80°F, deduct 850 Btuh per 1000 ft3/min of indoor coil air for each degree below 80°F, or add 850 Btuh per 1000 ft3/mln of indoor coil air per degree above 80°F. 3.Total system KW Includes compressor KW, outdoor fan motor KW, and indoor blower motor KW. HP-95 •__ I Payne Air Conditioning GOP Company Indianapolis, IN City of Industry. CA SPECIFICATIONS SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE W UNIT MUST BEINSTALLEO IN ACCORDANCE WITH INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS HP-98 PRINTED IN U.S.A. 6/86 I I 1: 5' -- -•.••• .. - -- -• - ---a- / Honeywell THESE ThERMOS1FATS AND SUBBASES PRO- VIDE LOW VOLTAGE CONTROL OF MULTI- STAGE HEATING AND COOLING SYSTEMS, INCLUDING HEAT PUMP SYSTEMS. 0 T874 Thermostat requires a Q674 Subbase. Q674 Subbase provides system and fan switching, wiring terminals, and mounting base for T874 Thermostat. T874 Thermostat has silent, dust-free mercury switchei operated by coiled bimetal elements. Adapter plate available for mounting Q674 on wall or horizontal outlet box. Heat anticipator(s) are adjustable or fixed; cool- ing anticipator(s) are fixed. 0 Individual heat and cool levers and scales for temperature setting located on top of thermostat case. Cover thermometer on most T874 Thermostat pk models. LED indicator lights located on top of thermostat case for easy reference. -' 0 Locking cover and locking lever screws available - for T874 Thermostats. 0 Plastic thermostat guards available for T874 . Thermostats. 0 Key Lock cover available for T874 Thermostats. Q674 Subbase available with up to 4 light emitting - diode (LED) indicators. - Up to 3 stages each of heating and cooling control . possible. . • 0 Models with set point restrictions available for Department of Defense (DoD) and other special applications. 0 Outdoor reset is used to improve thermal per- formance on some models. • . . o .. s.o. Form No. REV 4-81 60-2485-1 , - I , .f - ', I_Il S.. .........U- I- -'._% ._•_-•-_____:L__-- 'S .--. ..-..' .. .5--......................• - TRA DEL/NE Models continued 0674 SUBBASE Q674 switáhin 'subbases provided., system and fan switching as listed. TRADELINE FEATURE: TRADE LINE package with cross reference label and special instruction sheet. Q674A-E,G are standard models. Q674F,J,L are heat pump models. 0674 SYSTEM FAN A Heat-Auto-Cool Auto-On 8 Heat-Off-Cool Auto-On C Off-Auto Auto-On D None None E Off-Heat-Auto-Cool Auto-On F Em. Ht.-Off-Heat-Auto-Cool Auto-On G Off-Auto None J Em. Ht-Auto-Off Auto-On L Em. Ht.-Heat-Off-Cool Auto-On El 'IE STANDARD MODELS T874 THERMOSTATS MODELS: See Table 1. ELECTRICAL RATING: 24 to 30 Vac. SWITCHING: Coiled bimetal elements operate mercury switches. TEMPERATURE ADJUSTMENT: Heating and cooling setting levers, with separated scales located on top of thermostat base. Common lever for heating and cooling on T874R, 1 cooling lever on T874E, and 1 heating lever on T874F. - 5 1142.91 - 19.51 50607080 3! i - fl 188.91 t47.Sl- 2tS4.OI-.-f FIG. 1—DIMENSIONS OF T874 THERMOSTAT MOUNTED ON 0674 SUBBASE. 1' TEMPERATURE SCALE RANGE: 42 F to 88 F [6 C to 31 C], standard; optional ranges available. THERMOMETER RANGE: 42 F to 88 F [6 C to 31 C]. CHANGEOVER DIFFERENTIAL: 3 F [1.7 C] minimum between heating and cooling (5 F [2.8 C] on T874W). Levers may be set apart for greater separation. INTERSTAGE DIFFERENTIAL: Standard Models—mechanical differential is 1 F [0.6 C] between heating or cooling stages; open ating differential is approximately 1.9 F [1 C] between stages in heating or cooling. Special Models—See Table 1. FINISH: Beige. MOUNTING MEANS: T874 Thermostat mounts on Q674 Subbase. Subbase mounts horizontally on wall or outlet box. Mounts on vertical outlet box with optional 193121A Adapter Plate Assembly. OPTIONAL SPECIFICATIONS (T874 only): Temperature Scale Ranges: 40 F to 75 F [4 C to 24 C] heating and 75 F to 90 F [24 C to 32 C] cooling with stop; 44 F to 68 F [7 C to 20 C] heating, 80 F to 86 F[27 C to 30C] cooling;6.0 to 29C [43 F to 85 F] Celsius scale; 38 F to 72 F [3 C to 22 C] axd 78 F to 90 F [26 C to 32 C] cooling with stop. Nonadjustable factory added stop. Limits heating set point to 72 F [22 C] maximum, cooling set point to 78F[26C] minimum. Customer personalization. Locking cover and locking lever (see Accessories). Thermostat cover less thermometer. Adjustable locking temperature stops. Voltage heat anticipation—first or second stage heat or both (Table 1'.) Fast cycling on heating stage(s) for electric heat applications. 9. C815A outdoor thermistor. ACCESSORIES: 1. Locking cover and locking lever assembly—Part No. 194559R with thémometer, 194559S without thermometer. Includes cover, screws, and Allen wrench for locking cover, plus two 195057A self-tapping, in- sulated screws. These screws must ,be used to insure proper operation. E.- S.-., 60-2485-1 -41 h CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE S CITY. OF CARLSBAD Plan Check No. - DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING SERVICES DIVISION 2075 LAS PALMAS Carlsbad, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 This form shall be used to determine the amount of school fees for a project and to verify that the project applicant has, complied with the school fee requirements. No building permits, for the projects shall be issued until the certification is signed by the appropriate school district and returned to the City of Carlsbad Building Department. SCHOOL DISTRICT: . Carlsbad Unified San Marcos Unified 801 Pine Avenue 207 West San Marcos Blvd. Carlsbad, CA 92008 (457-4985) San Marco, CA 92069' (744-4776) Encinitas Union Elementary San Dieguito Union High School 189 Union Street ' 625 North Vulcan Encinitas, ,CA 92024 '(944-4306) Encinitas, CA 92024 (753-6491) Project Applicant: £(Axkt 't1cLIct AP N: /6 3O1_-_03 Project Address: /5L 'IiON S RESIDENTIAL: SQ. FT. of living area ' Number of dwelling units SQ. FT. of covered area SQ. FT. of -garage area COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL: SQ. FT. AREA LJ<6D c c,i\ otes' Prepared By IL - Date 3 L3 7 S FEE CERTIFICATION - (To be completed by the School District) 4 Applicant has complied with fee requirement under Government Code 53080 ____ Project is subject to an existing fee agreement • : ' 1. V'Project is exempt from Government Code 53080 .• Final Map approval and construction started before September 1, 1986. (other school fees paid) Othr • . . 4 - Residential Fee Levied $_____________ based on-sq ft .@ Comm/Indust Fee Levied $E3 based on sq ft .@ NT -7 Sclgdistrit Official S • - Title • Date AB 2926 and SB 201 fees are capped at $1.50 pr square foot for residential. " AB 2926 is capped at $.025 per square foot for comrnercial/industril. - S I COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL APPLICATION FORM FOR INDUSTRIAL WASTE DISCHARGE PERMIT CITY OF CARLSBAD APPLICATION: NEW. BUILDING P.C. ND.:___________ (CHECK ONE) REVISED APPLICATION NO.: 33 INDUSTRIAL CLASS: 31 _—Slgnature of-City Representative APPLICATION FOR INDUSTRIAL WASTE DISCHARGE PERMIT A. GENERAL: ITE /54 .friJ Q APPLICANT: ftAt111&6P 4Afl1TtDDRESS: Cjk44MO, 6 TYPE OF BUSINESS: fl1L. :APPLICANT'S ADORESS:p' &7ft Q .1Jtoe.4.rZ1O3 WASTES AND PROCESSING: (Check where applicable). Domestic Waste Only 1=1 Industrial Waste _I Industrial Waste NOT Discharged to Sewer Discharged to Sewer GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WASTE (Chemical and Physical Characteristics of proposed waste):_____________________________________________________ tIUMM 40 GENERAL DESCRIPTIONOF PROCESS (If Applicable):______________________ WASTES TOBE DISCHARGED TO SEWER: WASTE: TREATED: QUANTITY: AVERAGE GPD (Check One) UNTREAT : (Daily) MAXIMUM IOU GPD (Gallons Per Day) APPLICANT OR REPRESENTATIVE OF FIRM:__________________________________________ TITLE:Aft#fVZj0 SIGNATURE: HUGHES INVESTMENTS DEVELOPMENT & ACOUISITION.OF COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES December 17, 1987 Mr. Meredo P. Camero Building Inspector CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 Las Palmas. Carlsbad, CA 92009-4859 RE 1854 Marron Road (Building M) - North County Plaza Carlsbad, CA Dear Mr. Camero: Pursuant-to 'Gil Marshall's request, I am writing to verify that the above referenced building is to be completed as a shell. The individual tenants (B.'RRRRR... Yogurt, Pasta A Go-Go, and Peggy Sue's Diner) will individually take out building permits-for-their tenant improvements These Tenants will complete the ceilings, lighting, and electrical. In order for the Tenants to begin their TI work, we need to have the house meter set in order to provide them. -with electricity. YOur 'assistance in releasing the housemeters to SDG&E will be greatly appreciated. In the event you have questions regarding this building, pleasefeel "free to contact either me or Gil Marshall. .Sincerely yours, HUGHES NORTH COUNTY ASSOCIATES Kip . Robinson, CSM KGR maf -' TWO CORPORATE PLAZA SUITE 250• NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660-7929 - P. 0. BOX 8700• NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658-8700 ' (714) 759-9531 FAX 4t(714) 759-0128 - - 0 0 0 0 V 0 - 0 o Vi w LA c- .1 P v I 00 - 0 LA L p $(0I _C pI4 _c c Z - CD to D C r W Uz . : r 'm - - I - P00 v .L P 0 P -3 . 0 I m 14 , 0 r ID (I I. o r - P Pd bo 04 - -I - - Lr - (A CIO Ir 'F 01IZ T, T 'P Z 'P1 'P2 In £ TI - 1' £ - - Pi 01In LU 17 II LIX CC co C :- ______________