HomeMy WebLinkAbout1854 PENTAS CT; ; CB081661; PermitCity of CarlSbad
1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008
12-02-2008 Residential Permit Permit No: CB081661
Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725
Job Address: 1854 PENTAS CT CBAD
Permit Type: RESDNTL Sub Type: RAD Status: ISSUED
Parcel No: 2155210300 Lot #: 0 Applied: 09/02/2008
Valuation: $115,915.00 Construction Type: 5B Entered By: JMA
Occupancy Group: Reference #: Plan Approved: 12/02/2008
# Dwelling Units: 0 Structure Type: Issued: 12/02/2008
Bedrooms: 0 Bathrooms: 0 Inspect Area:
Project Title: VURBEFF RES : 929 SF ADDITION/ Ortg PC#:
=490 SF 1ST FLR,439 SF 2ND FLR, 10 SF BALCONY,NEW Plan Check#:
Applicant: Owner:
VURBEFF GREGG C&KIM L VURBEFF GREGG C&KIM L
1854 PENTAS CT 1854 PENTAS CT
CARLSBAD CA 92011 CARLSBAD CA 92011
Building Permit $704.17 MeterSize
Addi Building Permit Fee $0.00 Add'l Red. Water Con. Fee $0.00
Plan Check $457.71 Meter Fee $0.00
AddI Plan Check Fee $0.00 SDCWA Fee $0.00
Plan Check Discount $0.00 CFD Payoff Fee $0.00
Strong Motion Fee $11.59 PFF (3105540) $0.00
Park in Lieu Fee $0.00 PFF (4305540) $0.00
Park Fee $0.00 License Tax (3104193) $0.00
LFM Fee $0.00 License Tax (4304193) $0.00
Bridge Fee $0.00 Traffic Impact Fee (3105541) $0.00
Other Bridge Fee $0.00 Traffic Impact Fee (4305541) $0.00
BTD #2 Fee $0.00 Sidewalk Fee $0.00
BTD #3 Fee $0.00 PLUMBING TOTAL . $76.00
Renewal Fee $0.00 ELECTRICAL TOTAL $20.00
Addl Renewal Fee $0.00 MECHANICAL TOTAL $30.50
Other Building Fee $0.00 Housing !mpac.t Fee $0.00
HMP Fee $0.00 Housing lnLieu Fee $0.00
Pot. Water Con. Fee . $0.00 Housing Credit Fee . $0.00
.Meter Size Master Drainage Fee $0.00
Addi Pot. Water Con. Fee $0.00 Sewer Fee $0.00
Red. Water Con. Fee $0.00 Additional Fees $0.00
TOTAL PERMIT FEES $1,299.97
Total Fees: $1,299.97 Total Payments To Date: $1,299.97 Balance Due: $0.00
FINAL APPROVAL
Inspector: V" t.-eb2,1 Date: Clearance:
NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the Imposition of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively
referred to as'fees/exactions." You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must
follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for
processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack,
review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. ..
You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity
changes, nor planning, zoning grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project. NOR DOES IT APPLY to any
fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired.
City âf Carlsbad Plan Check No. Cf
1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008 Est. Value 760-602-2717/2718/2719 i
Fax: 760-602-8558 . . Plan Ck. Deposit
Building Permit Application . Date o ?
JOB ADDRESS I cf- SUITEIS/SPACE#/UNIT#
CT/PROJECT 41 LOT 44 PHASE 41
DESCRIPTION OF WORK: .
41 OF UNITS II BEDROOMS 41 BATHROOMS TENANT BUSINESS NAMc _Tf1i1wEOCCROUP_
-Y kLi ' + (t i4iiI 2If
"" -;
EXISTING USE PROPOSED USE GARAGE (SF) PATIOS (SF) DECKS (SF) FIREPLACE AIR CONDITIONING IFIRESPRINKLERS
YES/ #_ NO a. YES NOD YES D NOD
~Iff Different Forns Applicant APPLICANT NAME
ADDRESS
€s1_V1\14ezAV
ADDRESS
CITY S ATE ZIP CITY . STATE ZIP
PHONE FAX PHONE . . FAX
EMAIL . EMAIL
PROPERTY OWNE NAME . CONTRACTOR BUS. NAME
ADDRESS
CITY . STATE ZIP CITY STATE ZIP
. PHONE FAX PHONE . FAX
. . EMAIL . . EMAIE . .
ARCH/ ESIGNER NAME & ADDRESS . STATE tiC. 41 STATE LIC.# . CLASS CITY BUS. LIC.#
eec. 10313 Business and Professions (ode: Any Lity or County which requires a permit to construct alter improve, demolish or repair any structure prior to its issuance. also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that e is licensed jsoniiant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (Clrapte 9. commending with Section boo or Division .3 of the torment and Proftssuoos Code) or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than live hundred dollars ($500)). .
Workers' Compensation Declaration: thereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: . . . . I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-Insure for workers' compensation as provided bySection 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued.
I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My workers' compensation insurance carrier and policy
number are: Insurance Co. . Policy No. Expiration Date
This section need not be completed if the permit is for one hundred dollars ($100) or less: . . . 0 Certificate of Exemption: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of
California. WARNING: Failure to secure workers' comppnsation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars (9100,000), in
addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees.
AK CONTRACTOR SIGNATURE . DATE
thereby affirm that lam exempt from Contractor's License Law for the following reason: .
D I, as owner of the properly or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, Will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's
License Law does not apply loan owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for
sate. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale).
Cl I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply loan owner of
property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law).
O I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason:
1. I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. 0 Yes 0 No
2.1 (have! have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work.
I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name address! phone! contractors' license number):
I plan to provide portions of the work; but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name! address! phone! contractors' license number):
I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to.provide the work indicated (include name address phone type of work):
'PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE DATE
'øO a&(k t®II
Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the
Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? Cl Yes D No
Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? 0 Yes Cl No Is the facility lobe constructed within 1.000feet of the outer boundary of a school site? DYes 0 No '
IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF
EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT.
I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work this permit is issued (Sec. 3097 (I) Civil Code).
Lender's Name . Lender's Address
-. .. .
I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information iscorrectand that the informatlononthe plans isaccurote. I agree tocomptywith all City ordinances and State laws relating to buildingconstiuction.
thereby authorize representative of the City ofCadsba to enter the above mentioned propertyfor inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD
AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDMOXPIP SESIM-OCH MAY IN ANYWAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT.
OSHA: An OSHA permit is requir and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stones in height.
EXPIRATION: Every permit issu d eprovisions of this Code shall expire byfmitdtiori and become nut and void if the building or work authorized by such permitisnot comniencd within 180 days from the date of such p k orized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time alter the work is commenced fora period of 180 days (Section 106.4.4 Uniform Building Code).
.'APPLtCANT'S SIGNATU DATE
(o'
City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request
For: 06/18/2010
Permit# C8081661 Inspector Assignment: JIM
Title: VURBEFF RES : 929 SF ADDITION!
Description: =490 SF 1ST FLR,439 SF 2ND FLR, 10 SF BALCONY, NEW
FIREPLACE
Type: RESDNTL Sub Type: RAD
Phone: 7608147331
Job Address: 1854 PENTAS CT
Suite: Lot: 0
Location: Inspector:
APPLICANT VURBEFF GREGG C&KIM L
Owner: VURBEFF GREGG C&KIM L
Remarks:ppIeasei
Total Time: Requested By: GREG VUREFF
Entered By: CHRISTINE
CD Description Act Comments
19 Final Structural Vt Lklr & L(T. JAD S OI..
tpozwes &L4.
29 Final Plumbing t
39 Final Electrical tPL -i;•- Z4 i
49 Final Mechanical
Comments/Notices/Holds
Associated PCRs/CVs Original PC#
CV020563 CLOSED TRASH&CANS LEFT ON CURB ALLWEE;
Inspection History
Date
06/04/2010
01/07/2010
06/15/2009
06/15/2009
06/10/2009
06/08/2009
06/08/2009
06/08/2009
06/08/2009
05/26/2009
05/26/2009
05/26/2009
05/26/2009
Description
89 Final Combo
89 Final Combo
17 Interior Lath/Drywall
18 Exterior Lath/Drywall
16 Insulation
14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding
17 Interior Lath/Drywall
27 Shower Pan/Roman Tubs
34 Rough Electric
14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding
22 Sewer/Water Service
24 Rough/Topout
34 Rough Electric
Act lnsp Comments
CO MC NOTICE ATTACHED
CO PD GUARDS, FLATWORK
AP JM
AP JM
AP JM
AP JM LIST @ INSULATION
AP JM
AP JM
AP JM
CO JM
AP JM
AP JM TOP OUT OK
COJM
_
'I
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
7715 CONVOY COURT, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92111
TELEPHONE: (858) 560-1713
NOTICE OF EXCAVATION INSPECTION
JOB LOCATION:ISIS / P 1 / d
I
WORK ORDER NO.:_' "116G REF. WORK ORDER NO.: '
OWNER OR CONTRACTOR: _6 v i1€
ADDRESS:
.4
S
DATE INSPECTED:
TYPE OF EXCAVATIONS: CONTINUOUS FOOTING_-. SPREAD FOOTING_______________
CAISSON FRICTION PILE SWIMMINGPOOL__________ OTHER___________
DESCRIPTION OF EXCAVATIONS COVERED BY THIS NOTICE:
Foo/ sccc'('cl L.0 t 74.
e;c 1e i
JMCIy i c,( tcL SC/((c,1Qfc! (jy 7/e i,ii&Iec(
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL_______________________________________________________
The undersigned has inspected the excavations listed above on the referenced property and same were excavated in accord-
ance with our recommendations in the preliminary foundation report and the Building Code 'of the
'00~ PAC I F /10' 1 L S;E ~N R I N AG,d:~5~
- -•
• SIGNATURE
DISTR: (1) Office
Inspector
Project
Form 79
EsGil Corporation
In 'Partnership with government for cBuil&ng safety
DATE: 11/25/2008 U A CANT
r 6J JURIS.
JURISDICTION: City of Carlsbad EVIEWER
U FILE
PLAN CHECK NO.: 08-1661 SET: III
PROJECT ADDRESS: 1854 Pentas Court
PROJECT NAME: Vurbeef Addition
The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply
with the jurisdiction's building codes.
The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes
when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff.
The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list
and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck.
The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil
Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck.
F-1 The applicant's copy of the checklist is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant
contact person.
The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to:
Eègil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
III REMARKS:
By: Aaron Goodman Enclosures:
Esgil Corporation
fl GA 0 MB 0 EJ LI PC 11/25/2008
9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 50-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576
EsGil Corporation
In (Partners flip wit/i government for (Buifling Safety
DATE: 11/1312008
JURISDICTION: City of Carlsbad
PLAN CHECK NO.: 08-1661 SET: II
PROJECT ADDRESS: 1854 Pentas Court
PROJECT NAME: Vurbeef Addition
U A LICANT
r1CrJ—URIS.—_-)
RE VIE W ER
U FILE
The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply
with the jurisdiction's building codes.
The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes
when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff.
The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list
and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck.
The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil
Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck.
Lii The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant
contact person.
The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to:
Chris Robinson
859 Viva Court
Solana Beach, CA 92075
Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
Person contacted: Chris Robinson
Date contacted: IC fI4It9jyde?4
Telephone #: 858-922-2013
Fax #: 858-259-2001
Mail 1/'Telephone Fax In Person
LII REMARKS:
By: Aaron Goodman Enclosures:
Esgil Corporation
DGA [:1 M13 0 E oPC 11/06/2008
9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576
RECHECK CORRECTION LIST
JURISDICTION: City of Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 08-1661
PROJECT ADDRESS: 1854 Pentas Court SET: II
DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY DATE RECHECK COMPLETED:
ESGIL CORPORATION: 11/06/2008
. 11/13/2008
REVIEWED BY: Aaron Goodman
FOREWORD (PLEASE READ):
This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Building Code,
Plumbing Code, Mechanical Code, Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy
conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations
enforced by the Building Department. You may have, other corrections based on laws and
ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other
departments.
The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied
before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. The approval of
the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law.
To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon
which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the
revised plans.
The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews. The original
correction number has been given for your reference. In case you did not keep a copy of
the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding
corrections. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items.
Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of
corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where
they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list?
UYes UNo
Please make all corrections, as requested in the correction list. Submit three new complete sets
of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For
expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways:
Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of
Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-
2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning,
Engineering and Fire Departments.
Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320
Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all
remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building
Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments.
NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City
Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete.
All sheets of plans must be signed by the person responsible for their preparation. i.e.
the structural sheets must be sealed and signed by the engineer. (California Business
and Professions Code).
11/13/2008: Just a reminder.
In Seismic Design Categories D, E or F, the soils investigation must address liquefaction,
and, if retaining walls are proposed, the soils investigation must address increased
loading on the walls due to earthquake motions. Section 1802.2.7.
11/13/2008: The issue of liquefaction was not mentioned in the soils report. Please
provide.
Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan
and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the
recommendations in the soils report are properly incorporated into the construction
documents (when required by the soil report).
11/13/2008: The letter requested was not provided.
Specify on the foundation plan or structural specifications sheet the soil classification, the
soils expansion index and the design bearing capacity of the foundation. Section
A106.1.1.
11/13/2008: I did not see this information on the plans. Please provide.
The soils engineer recommended that he/she review the foundation excavations. Note
on the foundation plan that "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building Department
foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the building official in writing that:
The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report,
The utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and
The foundation excavations, the soils expansive characteristics and bearing capacity
conform to the soils report."
11/13/2008: 1 did not see this information on the plans. Please provide.
.END OF REVIEW
To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has
been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc.
Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of
corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where
they are located in the plans.
Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please
indicate:
Yes L3 No U
The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite
208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan
review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please
contact Aaron Goodman at Esgil Corporation.
Thank you
EsGil Corporation
In Partnersfiip witfi government for Bui(41ng Safety
DATE: 09/10/2008 U AP LICANT
J URIS.
JURISDICTION: City of Carlsbad REVIEWER
U FILE
PLAN CHECK NO.: 08-1661 SET: I
PROJECT ADDRESS: 1854 Pentas Court
PROJECT NAME: Vurbeef Addition
LI The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply
with the jurisdiction's building codes.
LI The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes
when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff.
LI The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list
and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck.
The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil
Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck.
The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant
contact person.
The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to:
Chris Robinson
859 Viva Court
Solana Beach, CA 92075
Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
Esgil Corporation-staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
Person contacted: Chris Robinson
Date contacted: 5111 /0J ç/
Mail Telephone V 'Fa"xV'in Person
LII REMARKS: (11,11 )
By: Aaron Goodman
Esgil Corporation
E] GA 0MB DEJ F1 PC
Telephone #: 858-922-2013
Fax #: 858-259-2001
Enclosures:
09/05/2008
9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576
PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST
SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES
PLAN CHECK NO.: 08-1661 JURISDICTION: City of Carlsbad
PROJECT ADDRESS: 1854 Pentas Court
FLOOR AREA:
Proposed first floor: 490
Proposed second floor: 439
REMARKS:
DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY
JURISDICTION:
DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW
COMPLETED: 09/10/2008
STORIES: 2
HEIGHT: 27'-
DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY
ESGIL CORPORATION: 09/05/2008
PLAN REVIEWER: Aaron Goodman
FOREWORD (PLEASE READ):
This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the International Building
Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state
laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan
review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other
corrections based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering
Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be
required prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Present California law mandates that construction comply with the 2007 edition of the California
Building Code (Title 24), which adopts the following model codes: 2006 IBC, 2006 UPC, 2006
UMC and 2005 NEC.
The above regulations apply, regardless of the code editions adopted by ordinance.
The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied
before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 105.4 of
the 2006 International Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of
any state, county or city law.
To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each
correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet number, specification section, etc.
Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans.
Please make all corrections, as requested in the correction list. Submit three new
complete sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential
projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two
ways:
Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of
Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760)
602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad
Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments.
Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation,
9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468.
Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of
Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and
Fire Departments.
NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by
the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is
complete.
1. All sheets of plans must be signed by the person responsible for their
preparation. i.e. the structural sheets must be sealed and signed by the
engineer. (California Business and Professions Code).
2. Provide a statement on the Title Sheet of the plans, stating that this project shall
comply with the 2007 California Building Code, which adopts the 2006 IBC, 2006
UMC, 2006 UPC and the 2005 NEC.
3. Please revise the section numbers and notes on the plans to match the 2006
IBC, as adopted by California.
4. Clearly dimension building setbacks from property lines, street centerlines, and
from all adjacent buildings and structures on the site plan. Sec. A106.1.1.
5. Show locations of permanently wired smoke alarms with battery backup as
follows (Section 907.2.10.1.2):
- Inside each bedroom.
On the ceiling or wall outside of each separate sleeping area in the
immediate vicinity of bedrooms.-
In each story within a dwelling unit, including basements.
NOTE: Where more than one smoke alarm is required to be installed within a
unit, the smoke alarms shall be interconnected in such a manner that the
activation of one alarm will activate all of the alarms in the unit. Section
907.2.10.3.
6. Where an addition, alteration or repair to an individual dwelling unit or guestroom
in Group R requires a permit, battery-operated smoke alarms shall be installed in
the existing construction in accordance with the preceding item. Section
907.2.10.5.2.
7. Please correct the reference to Guards on sheet A-3.0 and show details of the
guard at the interior stairway. (Section 1013):
a) Shall have a height of 42" (may be 34" along the sides of stairs). CBC
Section 1013.
8. Provide stairway and landing details. Section 1009.
Maximum rise is 7-3/4" and minimum run is 10".
A nosing not less than .75 inch but not more than 1.25 inches shall be
provided on stairways with solid risers where the tread depth is less than
11 inches.
Solid risers are required, or risers shall be sufficiently solid to prevent the
passage of a 4" sphere. Section 1009.3.3.
Minimum headroom is 6'-8".
Minimum width is 36".
The greatest riser height within any flight of stairs shall not exceed the
smallest by more than 3/8 inch. The greatest tread depth within any flight
of stairs shall not exceed the smallest by more than 3/8 inch.
9. Handrails (CBC Section 1009.10):
a) Shall be provided on at least one side of each stairway.
Exception: Stairs with fewer than four risers do not require any
handrails.
Handrails and extensions shall be 34" to 38" above nosing of treads and
be continuous.
The handgrip portion of all handrails shall be not less than 1-1/4 inches
nor more than 2 inches in cross-sectional dimension. See Section 1012.3
for alternatives.
Handrails projecting from walls shall have at least 1-1/2 inches between
the wall and the handrail.
Ends of handrails shall be returned or shall have rounded terminations or
bends.
10. Speeiy roof slope on the plans.
11. Specify minimum 1/4 inch per foot roof/deck slope for drainage or design to
support accumulated water. The exterior deck/balcony does not show up in
section BB/6 (not 5). Please show the deck/balcony and the slope. Section
1611.2.
12. Show attic ventilation. Minimum vent area is 1/150 of attic area or 1/300 of attic
area if at least 50 percent of the required vent is at least 3 feet above eave or
cornice vents. Section 1203.2.
13. Structural members supporting a horizontal fire barrier must have the same
fire-resistive rating as the separation. Section 711.4.
14. A foundation/soils investigation is required for all projects in Seismic Design
Categories C, D, E or F. The geologic report from 1974 is not adequate. Most
reports have a time limit of .2 to 3 years. Section 1802.2.
15. Provide a copy of the project soil report. The report shall include foundation
design recommendations based on the engineer's findings.
16. In Seismic Design Categories D, E or F, the soils investigation must address
liquefaction, and, if retaining walls are proposed, the soils investigation must
address increased loading on the walls due to earthquake motions. Section
1802.2.7.
17. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan,
grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been
determined that the recommendations in the soils report are properly
incorporated into the construction documents (when required by the soil report).
18. Specify on the foundation plan or structural specifications sheet the soil
classification, the soils expansion index and the design bearing capacity of the
foundation. Section A106.1.1.
19. The soils engineer recommended that he/she review the foundation excavations.
Note on the foundation plan that "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building
Department foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the building
official in writing that:
The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report,
The utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and
The foundation excavations, the soils expansive characteristics and
bearing capacity conform to the soils report."
20. Show distance from foundation to edge of cut or fill slopes ("distance-to-
daylight") and show slope and heights of cuts and fills. Figure 1805.3.1.
21. Note on plans that surface water will drain away from building and show drainage
pattern. The grade shall fall a minimum of 5% within the first 10 feet (2% for
impervious surfaces). Section 1803.3.
22. Sill plate size and anchorage. 1I Anchor bolts shall be provided with
square washers in accordance with Section 2305.3.11. Show the 3" square x
0.229" plate on the plans.
23. Specify size, ICC approval number and manufacturer of power driven pins,
expansion anchors or epoxy anchors. Show edge, end distance and spacing.
Section A106.1.1.
Show size, embedment and location of hold down anchors on foundation plan,
i.e., the HD schedule needs to be on the foundation plan. Section A106.1.1.
Special inspection for seismic resistance shall be noted on the plans for the
following conditions in accordance with Section 1707.
Seismic Desi at inspection required
C, D, E, and F • Structural wood*, structural welding, and cold form
steel framing in "seismic-force-resisting systems""
* Special inspection is not required for wood where the fastener spacing of the sheathing is
more than 4" on center.
** The part of the structural system that has been considered in the design to provide the
required resistance to the prescribed seismic forces. (Section 1613.1)
A Statement of Special Inspections, prepared by the registered design
professional in responsible charge, shall be submitted. This statement shall
include a complete list of materials and work requiring special inspection, the
inspections to be performed and an indication whether the special inspection will
be continuous or periodic. Section 1705.2.
Specify on the plans the following information for the fireplace(s), per Section
A106.1.1:
Manufacturer's name and model number, ICC approval number, or equal.
Show the height of the factory-built chimney above the roof and the
horizontal clearances per listing approval. Chimneys shall extend at least
3' above the highest point where it passes through a roof and at least 2'
higher than any portion of a building within a horizontal distance of 10
feet. CIVIC Section 802.5.2.1
Note on the plans that approved spark arrestors shall be installed on all
chimneys. CBC Section 2802.1.
Decorative shrouds shall not be installed at the termination of chimneys
for factory-built fireplaces, except where such shrouds are listed and
labeled for use with the specific system and installed in accordance with
the manufacturer's installation instructions.
City ordinance. All chimneys attached to any appliance or fireplace that
burns solid fuel shall be equipped with an approved spark arrester. The
net free area of the spark arrester shall be not less than four times the net
free area of the outlet of the chimney. The spark arrester screen shall
have heat and corrosion resistance equivalent to twelve gauge wire,
nineteen gauge galvanized wire or twenty-four gauge stainless steel.
Openings shall not permit the passage of spheres having a diameter
larger than one-half inch and shall not block the passage of spheres
having a diameter of less than three-eight inch.
28. Show on the plan the amperage of the electrical service, the location of the
service panel and the location of any sub-panels. If the service is over 200
amperes, submit a single line diagram, panel schedules, and provide service
load calculations.
29. For a single-family dwelling unit show that at least one receptacle outlet
accessible at grade level will be installed outdoors at the front and back of the
dwelling. CEC Article 210.52(E). This receptacle must be GFCI protected.
30. In the garage, provide an adequate barrier to protect the water heater from
vehicle damage. An 18" platform for the water heater does not satisfy this
requirement. CPC Section 508.14.
31. Provide a note on the plans: The control valves in bathtubs, whirlpool bathtubs,
showers and tub-shower combinations must be pressure balanced or
thermostatic mixing valves. CPC Section 414.5 and 418.0.
32. Specify on the plans: Water conserving fixtures: New water closets shall use no
more than 1.6 gallons of water per flush, lavatories and kitchen faucets may not
exceed 2.2 GPM,-and showers may not exceed 2.5 GPM of flow. CPC Section
402.0.
33. The regulations require a properly completed and properly signed Form CF-1 R
(4 pages) to be either imprinted on the plans, taped to the plans or "sticky
backed" on the plans, to allow the building inspector to readily compare the
actual construction with the requirements of the approved energy design. Sheet
or page 1 is missing.
34. Specify, on the building plans, that all of the mandatory energy features are
indicated on the plans and specifications or include a completed MF-1 R form on
the plans. Check off all mandatory measures that apply.
35. Show on the plans compliance with the residential energy lighting requirements
(Mandatory requirement): -
In bathrooms, garages, laundry rooms, and utility rooms all fixtures must
—be high efficacy style or be controlled by a manually-on occupancy
sensor.
All other rooms require any installed fixtures to be high efficacy or be
controlled by a manually-on occupancy sensor or dimmer. (Closets under
70 square feet are exempt).
Outdoor lighting fixtures are required to be high efficacy or controlled by a
combination photocontrol/motion sensor.
Note: Generally a high efficacy style of fixture is fluorescent complete with
electronic ballasts. Regular incandescent, quartz halogen and halogen MR
lamps do not comply.
36. The replacement windows in an alternation must meet the U-factor and Solar
Heat Gain Coefficient (SHGC) of Package "D". (Prescriptive requirement)
37. The window schedule shall clearly describe the required U-factor and solar heat
gain coefficient (SHGC) values and demonstrate compliance with the Title 24
energy calculations.
END OF REVIEW
To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item
has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc.
Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result
of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them
and where they are located in the plans.
Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction
list? Please indicate:
Yes Ell . No U
The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake
Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to
perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan
review items, please contact Aaron Goodman at Esgil Corporation.
Thank you
[DO NOT PAY— THIS IS NOTAN INVOICE]
VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE
JURISDICTION: City of Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 08-1661
PREPARED BY: Aaron Goodman DATE: 09/10/2008
BUILDING ADDRESS: 1854 Pentas Court Set: I
BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R-3/U TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V-B
BUILDING
PORTION
AREA
(Sq. Ft.)
Valuation
Multiplier
Reg.
Mod.
VALUE ($)
Proposed 1st fIr 490 121.94 59,751
Proposed 2nd fir 439 121.94 53,532
Balcony 10 14.41 144
Fireplace 1 2,426.62 2,427
Air Conditioning
Fire Sprinklers
TOTAL VALUE 115,853
Jurisdiction Code lCb IBy Ordinance
Bldg Permit Fee by Ordinance I $650 Oil
Plan Check Fee by Ordinance I $422.511
Type of Review: LI Complete Review LI Structural Only
LI Other Repetitive Fee LI
Repeats LI Hourly Hour *
Esgil Plan Review Fee $364.01
Comments:
Sheet I of I
macvalue.doc
City of Carlsbaa!
101\Pubuicworksmn9ineerin9
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
DATE: -
PLANCHECK NO.: CB O8/64f
BUILDING D'RESS: f855I ("e41 cr
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ?
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 2[5- $2f. o3
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
EST. VALUE:
APPROVAL
The item you have submitted for review has been
approved: The approval is based. on plans,
information and/or specifications provided in your
submittal; therefore any changes to these items after
this date, including field modifications, must be
reviewed by this office to insure continued
conformance with applicable codes. Please review
carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply
with instructions in this report can result in
suspension of permit to build.
DENIAL
PleEse see the attached report of deficiencies
marked with 0. Make necessary corrections to plans
or specifications for compliance with applicable
codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or
specifications to this office for.review.
By: Date:
D A Right-of-Way permit is required prior to
construction of the following improvements: By: - Date:
By: ________ •Date:
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
GINEERING AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE BUILDING PERMIT:
By: Date:
O DedattoflApplication
Dedication Checklist
Improvement Application
Improvement Checklist
ENGINEERING DEPT. CONTACT PERSON
Name: JOANNE JUCHNIEWICZ
City of Carlsbad
Address: 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008
Phone: (760) 602-2775
O Neighborhood Improvement Agreement CFD INFORMATION
0 Grading Permit Application Parcel Map No:
Grading Submittal Checklist Lots:
U Right-of-Way Permit Application Recordation:
E] Right-of-Way Permit Submittal Checklist Carlsbad Tract:
and Information Sheet
Storm water Applicability Checklist
Carlsbad, CA 9200-7314 • (760) 602-2720 • FAX (760) 602'52
1
is 2ND 3RD
El
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
SITE PLAN
1. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show:
q;z-Y
L,Cue&
North Arrow F. Right-of-Way Width & Adjacent Streets
Existing & Proposed Structures G. Driveway widths
Existing Street Improvements H. Existing or proposed sewer lateral (6) Property Lines frb.*- Existing or proposed water service
'E Easements (rp, rs t J. Existing or proposed irrigation service
8
2. Show on site plan:
A. Drainage Patterns
( 1. Building pad surface drainage must maintain a minimum slope of one
4' QT t percent towards an adjoining street or an approved drainage course.
- 2. ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE: "Finish grade will provide a minimum positive
' \)\ drainage of 2% to swale 5',away .from building."
! B. Existing & Proposed Slopes and Topography 5'Lc
Size, type, location, alignment of existing or proposed sewer and water service (s)
r
. 19 that serves the project. Each unit requires a separate service, however, second
dwelling units and apartment complexes are an exception.
D. Sewer and water laterals should not be located within proposed driveways, per
standards. . .
El 0
For commercial/industrial buildings and tenant improvement projects; include:
total building square footage with the square footage for each different use,
existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing,
warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved. .
EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION
F:8UIIDING PI.ANCIIECK cKLST FORM.doc 2 ...
. Rev. 7114100
3. Include on title sheet:
A. Site address
Assessor's Parcel Number
C Legal Description
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
1ST 2ND 3R0 DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE
U U 4a. Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of approval for
ProjectNo.________________________________________________________
U UI U 4b. All conditions are in compliance. Date:
DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS .
0 5. Dedication for all Street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the building site and any storm
drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and
for remodels with a value at or exceeding $ 17.000 , pursuant to Carlsbad
Municipal Code Section 18.40,030:
Dedication required as follows:
Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor
prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8 Y2" x 11" plat map and
submit with a title report. All easement documents must be approved and signed
by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. Attached please find an
application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process. Submit the
completed application form with the required checklist items and fees to the
Engineering Department in person. Applications will not be accept by mail or fax.
Dedication completed by: Date:
IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS
U U 0 6a. All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be
constructed at time of building construction whenever the value . of the
construction exceeds $ 82.000 , pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section
18.40.040.
Public improvements required as follows:
Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public
improvement requirements. . A registered Civil Engineer must prepare the
appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements
on the attached checklist to the Engineering Department through a separate plan
check-process. The completed application form and the requirements on the
F:8UU.DING PLANCHECK CKLST FORM.doc 3 .
. Rev. 7114100.
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
1ST 2N0 3RD
checklist must be submitted in person. Applications by mail or fax are not
accepted. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted
and fees paid prior to issuance of building permit.
Improvement Plans signed by: Date:
fl E. E 6b. Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad
Municipal Code Section 18.40. Please Submit a recent property title report or
current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $430. so we may
prepare the necessary Neighborhood Improvement Agreement.. This agreement
must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a'
• Building permit.
Future public improvements required as follows:
El 0 0 6c. Enclosed please find your Neighborhood Improvement Agreement. Please return
agreement signed and notarized to the Engineering Department.
Neighborhood Improvement
Agreement completed, by:
Date:
izf 11 0 6d. No Public Improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or defective
improvements found adiacent to building site 'must be repaired to the satisfaction
. of the City Inspector prior to occupancy. .
GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
The conditions, that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section
15.16.010 of the Municipal Code.
0 0 J 7a. Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading
requirements. Include accurate grading quantities in cubic yards (cut, fill, import,
export and remedial). This information must be included on the plans.
El LI 0 lb. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil
Engineer must be submitted together with the completed application form
attached.' NOTE: The. Grading Permit must be issued and rough grading
approval obtained prior to issuance of a Building Permit.
Grading Inspector sign off by:
, • .
• Date: • . •
o 0 0 •. 7c. Graded Pad Certification required. (Note: Pad certification may be required even
if a grading permit is not required.) ,
F:BUILDING PLANcHECK CKLST FORM.doc 4 • Rev. 7114100
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
1 ST 2 ND 3RD
0 0 7d .No Grading Permit required.
0 0 0 7e. If grading is not required, write "No Grading" on plot plan.
MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS
0 0 8. A RIGHT-6F-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-Way and/or
oy private work adjacent to the public Right-of-Way. Types of work in but are
not limited to: street improvements, tree trimming, driveway construction, tying
into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities.
Right-of-Way permit required for:
0 11 9. INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT If your facility is located in the City of Carlsbad
sewer service area, you need to contact the Carlsbad Municipal Water District,
located at 5950 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008. District personnel can
provide forms and assistance, and will check to see if your business enterprise is
on the EWA Exempt List. You may telephone (760) 438-2722, extension 7138,
for assistance.
Industrial Waste permit accepted by:
/ Date:• 0
0 0 10. NPDES PERMIT
Complies with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant • shall provide best
management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to
discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by
the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever
occurs first. •
10.a.STORM'WATER COMPLIANCE FORM
•
•
•
,'uires PSWP (project storm water permit): # •
1 Tier I/Tier Il (Requires SWPPP) - Please complete attached forms
Exempt - Please complete attached exemption form • • •
O 0 11. FEES
O Required fees are attached • 0
0 No fees required •
F:IBUILDING PLANCHECK CKLST FORM.doc 5 ••
Rev. 7114100
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
WATER METER REVIEW
ST 2ND 3RD 0
El 0 12a. Domestic (potable) Use r Ensure that the meter proposed by the owner/developer is not oversized.
Oversized meters are inaccurate during low-flow conditions. If it is oversized, for
the life of the meter, the City will not accurately bill the owner for the water used.
All single family dwelling units received "standard" 1" service with 5/8" service.
If owner/developer proposes a size other than the "standard", then
owner/developer must provide potable water demand calculations, which
include total fixture counts and maximum water demand in gallons per minute
(gpm). A typical fixture count and water demand worksheet is attached. Once
the gpm is provided, check against the "meter sizing schedule" to verify the
anticipated meter size for the unit.
Maximum service and meter size is a 2" service with a 2" meter.
If a developer is proposing a meter greater than 2", suggest the installation of
multiple 2" services as needed to provide the anticipated demand. (manifolds
are considered on case by case basis to limit multiple trenching into the
Street).
0 0 12b. Irrigation Use (where recycled water is not available)
All irrigation meters must be sized via irrigation calculations (in gpm) prior to
approval. The developer must provide these calculations. Please follow these
guidelines:
If the project is a newer development (newer than 1998), check the recent
improvement plans and observe if the new irrigation service is reflected on
the improvement sheets. If so, at the water meter station, the demand in
gpm may be listed there. Irrigation services are listed with a circled "I",
and potable water is typically a circled "W". The irrigation service should
look like:
,-.. STA 1+00 Install 2" service and
'- 1.5: meter (estimated 100 gpm)
If the improvement plans do not list the irrigation meter and the
service/meter will be installed via another instrument such as the building
plans or grading plans (w/ a right of way permit of course), then the
applicant must provide irrigation calculations for estimated worst-case
irrigation demand (largest zone with the farthest reach). Typically, Larry
Black has already reviewed this if landscape plans have been prepared;
but the applicant must provide the calculations to you for your use. Once
you have received a good example of irrigation calculations, keep a set for
your reference. In general the calculations will include:
Hydraulic grade line
Elevation at point of connection (POC)
Pressure at POC in pounds per square inch (PSI)
Worse case zone (largest, farthest away from valve
Total Sprinkler heads listed (with gpm use per head)
Include a 10% residual pressure at point of connection
F:BUII.OING PLANCHECK CKLST FORM.doc 6 •
Rev. 7114100
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1ST 2ND 3RD
3. In general, all major sloped areas of a subdivision/project are to be
irrigated via separate irrigation meters (unless the project is only SFD with
no HOA). As long as the project is located within the City recycled water
service boundary, the City intends on switching these irrigation
services/meters to a new recycled water line in the future.
Ix 0 LI 12c. Irrigation Use (where recycled water is available)
I. Recycled water meters are sized the same as the irrigation meter above.
2. If a project fronts a street with. recycled water, then they should be
connecting to this line to irrigate elopes within the development. For
subdivisions, this should have been identified, and implemented on the
improvement plans. Installing recycled water meters is a benefit for the
applicant since they are exempt from paying the San Diego County Water
Capacity fees. However, if they front a street which the recycled water is
there, but is not live (sometimes they are charged with potable water until
recycled water is available), then the applicant must pay the San Diego
Water Capacity Charge. If within three years, the recycled water line is
charged with recycled water by CMWD, then the applicant can apply for a
refund to the San Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA) for a refund.
However, let the applicant know that we cannot guarantee the refund, and
they must deal with the SDCWA for this.
0 El 0 13. Additional Comments:
F:BUI WINO PLANCHECK CKLST FORM.doc 7 - ...
Rev. 7114100
CITY OF CARLSBAD
STANDARD FORM - TIER 1 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN
STORM WATER COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE
/ My project is not in a category of permit types exempt from the
Construction SWPPP requirements
I My project is not located inside or within 200 feet of an environmentally
sensitive area with a significant potential for contributing pollutants to
nearby receiving waters by way of storm water runoff or non-storm water
discharge(s).
I My project does not requires a grading plan pursuant to the Carlsbad
Grading Ordinance (Chapter 15.16 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code)
My project will not result in 2,500 square feet or more of soils disturbance
including any associated construction staging, stockpiling, pavement
removal, equipment storage, refueling and maintenance areas that meets
one or more of the additional following criteria:
located within 200 feet of an environmentally sensitive area or the
Pacific Ocean; and/or,
disturbed area is located on a slope with a grade at or exceeding 5
horizontal to I vertical; and/or
disturbed area is located along or within 30 feet of a storm drain inlet,
an open drainage channel or watercourse; and/or
construction will be initiated during the rainy season or will extend into
the rainy season (Oct. 1 through April 30).
I CERTIFY TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE THAT ALL OF THE
ABOVE CHECKED STATEMENTS ARE TRUE AND CORRECT. I AM
SUBMITTING FOR CITY APPROVAL A TIER I CONSTRUCTION
SWPPP PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS
OF CITY STANDARDS.
I UNDERSTAND AND ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I MUST: (1)
IMPLEMENT BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPS) DURING
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT
PRACTICABLE TO MINIMIZE THE MOBILIZATION OF POLLUTANTS
SUCH AS SEDIMENT AND TO MINIMIZE THE EXPOSURE OF
STORM WATER TO CONSTRUCTION RELATED POLLUTANTS; AND,
(2) ADHERE TO, AND AT ALL TIMES, COMPLY WITH THIS CITY
APPROVED TIER I CONSTRUCTION SWPPP THROUGHTOUT THE
DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES UNTIL THE
CONSTRUCTION WORK IS COMPLETE AND APPROVED BY THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD.
C-4
0WNER(S)IfJ'8/ftIER'S AGENT NAME (PRINT)
STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION NOTES
ALL NECESSARY EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS SHALL BE
AVAILABLE ON SITE TO FACILITATE RAPID
INSTALLATION OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
BUYS WHEN RAIN IS EMINENT.
THE OWNER/CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL EROSION
CONTROL DEVICES TO WORKING ORDER TO THE
SATISFACTION OF THE CITY ENGINEER AFTER EACH RUN-
OFF PRODUCING RAINFALL.
THE OWNER/CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ADDITIONAL
EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY
THE CITY ENGINEERING OR BUILDING INSPECTOR DUE TO
UNCOMPLETED GRADING OPERATIONS OR UNFORESEEN
CIRCUMSTANCES WHICH MAY ARISE.
ALL REMOVABLE PROTECTIVE DEVICES SHALL BE IN.
PLACE AT THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY WHEN THE
FIVE (5) DAY RAIN PROBABILITY FORECAST EXCEEDS
FORTY PERCENT (40%). SILT AND OTHER DEBRIS SHALL
BE REMOVED AFTER EACH RAINFALL.
ALL GRAVEL BAGS SHALL BE BURLAP TYPE WITH 3/4
INCH MINIMUM AGGREGATE.
ADEQUATE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL AND
PERIMETER PROTECTION BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE
MEASURES MUST BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED.
SPECIAL NOTES
Site Address: 59 Pç c$r
Assessor's Parcel Number: 21c -S'l-O
Project ID: 6b CO
Construction Permit No.: ?~po6'i e)
Estimated Construction Start Date .!1-16 -02)
Project Duration
Emergency Contact:
Name: CiMh ULit4if
24 hour Phone: I
Perceived Threat to Sto Water Quality
C] Medium ow
If medium box is checked, must a ch a site plan
sheet showing proposed work area and location of
proposed structural BMPs
For City Use Only
O'wftEk(S)/OWNER'S AGENT NAME (SIGNATURE) DATE
Instructions: Begin by reviewing the list of construction activities and checking the box to the left of any activity that will occur during the proposed construction. Add any other activity descriptions in the blank
activity description boxes provided for that purpose and place a check in the box immediately to the left of the added activity description. For each activity descrribed, pick one or more best management
practices (BMPs) from the list located alon the top of the form. Then place an X in the box at the place where the activity row intersects with the BUT column. Do this for each activity that was checked off and
for each of the selected BMPs selected from the list. For Example - If the project includes site access across dirt, then check the box to the left of "Site Access Across Dirt". Then review the list for something
that applies such as "Stabilized Construcion Ingress/Egress" under Tracking Control. Follow along the "Site Access Across Dirt" row until you get to the "Stabilized Construction Ingress/Egress" column and
place an X in the box where the two meet. As, another example say the project included a stockpile that you intend to cover with a plastic sheet. Since plastic sheeting is not on the list of BMPs, then write in
"Cover with Plastic" in the blank column under the heading Erosion Control BMPs. Then place an X in the box where "Stockpiling" row intersects the new "Cover with Plastic" column.
To learn more about what each BUT description means, you may wish to review the BMP Reference Handout prepared to assist applicants in the selection of appropriate Best Management Practice measures.
The reference also explains the California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA) designation and how to apply the various selected BMPs to a project.
Page 2of____
Erosion Control Tracking Non-Storm Waste Management and Materials
BMPs Sediment Control BMPs Co Ps Management 7F'S Pollution Control BMPs
0
C 0 C —
V
—
cm E 0 o 0
BestManagementPractice 129 . W (BMP)Description4 to
Im 00 IE
Im I . I H ft . . .0 1! E8 02 .50 . co o 8 o LU cJ5 u 0 it C!) 0> co wa. co.E ce a. of 0- 0 a. >0 £ coo co
CASQA Deslgnation4
0 di w w w W U) Cl) U) U) U) CI) U) z Z Z Z
Construction Activity
- Grading/SoilDisturbance
Trenching/Excavation
Stockpiling
Drilling/Boring
Concrete/Asphalt Sawcutting
Concretefiatwork
Paving
Conduit/Pipe Installation
Stucco/Mortar Work
WastO Disposal
Staging/Lay Down Area
Equipment Maintenance and Fueling
Hazardous Substance Use/Storage
Dewatering
Site Access Across Dirt
Other (list):
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST
Plan Check No. CB 08-1661 Address 1854 Pentas Court
Planner hisTSt5i Phone (760) 602-74
APN: 215-521-03
Type of Project & Use: sf addition Net Project Density:1 .0DUIAC
Zoning: R-1 General Plan: RLM Facilities Management Zone:
CFD (in/out) #_Date of participation:_____ Remaining net dev acres:_____
Circle One
(For non-residential development: Type of land used created by this perrrit:
C I Legend: Z Item Complete 0 Item Incomplete - Needs your action
[=1 0 Environmental Review Required: YES 0 NO M TYPE
DATE OF COMPLETION:
Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action.
Conditions of Approval:
Z 0 0 Discretionary Action Required: YES 0 NO 0 TYPE
APPROVAL/RESO. NO. DATE
PROJECT NO.
OTHER RELATED CASES:
Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action.
Conditions of Approval:
0 0 Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance
Project site located in Coastal Zone? YES NO Q
CA Coastal Commission Authority? YES 0 NO JR
If California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact them at - 7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite 103,
San Diego, CA 92108-4402; (619) 767-2370
Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt): Exempt
0 0 Habitat Management Plan
Data Entry Completed? YES 0 NO 0
If property has Habitat Type identified in Table 11 of HMP, complete HMP Permit application and
assess fees in Permits Plus
(A/P/Ds, Activity Maintenance, enter CB#, toolbar, Screens, HMP Fees, Enter Acres of Habitat Type
impacted/taken, UPDATE!)
O 0 Inclusionary Housing Fee required: YES 0 NO Z
(Effective date of Inclusionary Housing Ordinance - May 21, 1993.)
Data Entry Completed? YES 0 NO 0
(A/P/Ds, Activity Maintenance, enter CB#, toolbar, Screens, Housing Fees, Construct Housing YIN,
Enter Fee, UPDATE!)
H:\ADMINTemplateBuilding Plancheck Review Checklist.doc Rev 4/08
Zoning:
Setbacks:
Front:
Interior Side:
Street Side:
Rear:
Top of slope:
Required Shown
Required j. Shown i.Q
Required Shown
Required iZ Shown 4
Required Shown
Accessory structure setbacks:
Site Plan:
Provide a fully dimensional site plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow, property lines, easements,
existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way width,
dimensional setbacks and existing topographical lines (including all side and rear yard slopes).
Provide legal description of property and assessor's parcel number.
Policy 44— Neighborhood Architectural Design Guidelines
1. Applicability: YES 0 NO
0 0 LI 2. Project complies: YES 0 NOD
Front: Required Shown
Interior Side: Required Shown
Street Side: Required Shown
Rear: Required • Shown
Structure separation: Required Shown _____
Lot Coverage: Required <40% Shown <40%
Height: Required Shown
O 0 5. Parking: Spaces Required Shown
(breakdown by uses for commercial and industrial projects required)
Residential Guest Spaces Required Shown
0 0 Additional Comments
OK TO ISSUE ANDENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER DATE
%Nlk
H:ADMINTempIate\BuiIding Plancheck Review Checklist.doc Rev 4/08
David Jolly, Land Surveying
764 Laguna Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Phone: 760-729-7969 Fax: 760-729-6351
E-mail: djoflyls@adelphia.net
SETBACK CERTIFICATION
1854 PENTAS CT.
CARLSBAD, CA 92011
I hereby certify that on March, 27, 2009 I performed a survey to determine the
distance of the existing foundation forms from the west property line at 1854
Pentas Ct., City of Carlsbad, CA, determined as follows:
Southwest corner of forms to west property line: 70
Northwest corner of forms to west property line: 7. 25' C -T '
If there are any questions please feel free to contact, me.
David Jolly, L.S.
Lic. No. 7672
Exp. Date 12/31/10
"I
0'
( ExPiO
\
*\ NO. 7872 J
fl
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
— 7715 CONVOY COURT, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92111
TELEPHONE: (858) 560-1713. FAX: (858) 560-0380
GREG VURBEFF
1854 Pentas Court
Carlsbad, CA 92009
November 19, 2008
Work Order 401166
Attention: Mr. Greg Vurbeff
Subject: Foundation Plan Review, 1854 Pentas Court, in the
City of Carlsbad, California
Reference: Geotechnical Update Letter and Foundation Design
Recommendations, 1854 Pentas Court, in the City of
Carlsbad, California
Gentlemen:
Presented herein is Pacific Soils Engineering, Inc.'s (PSE) foundation review for 1854 Pentas
Court, located in the City of Carlsbad, California. The foundation. plans prepared by Chris Robin-
son Designs, dated October 17, 2008, were reviewed with respect to the geotechnical recommen-
dations presented in the referenced report. The foundation plans and specifications were found to
be in general conformance with the geotechnical recommendations.
Should you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact the undersigned.
Respectfully submitted,
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
kk A:~= By:
SCOTT A. GRAY, RICE 67391
Manager of Geotechnical Services
Dist: (2) Addressee
(2) Chris Robinson Designs, Attn: Chris Robinson
SAG:j7J401 166, November 19,2008
No. 67391 Exp. 3--O(
OF
CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS LOS ANGELES COUNTY TEL: (114) 220-0770 TEL: (310) 325-7272 or (323) 775-6771 FAX: (714) 220-9589 FAX: (714) 220-9589
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SOUTH ORANGE COUNTY TEL: (951) 582-0170 TEL: (714) 730-2122 FAX: (951) 582-0176 AX: 714)730
to
-51S ernII
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
7715 CONVOY COURT, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92111
TELEPHONE: (858) 560-1713, FAX: (858) 560-0380
GREG VURBEFF
1854 Pentas Court
Carlsbad, CA 92009
November 19, 2008
Work Order 401 166
Attention: Mr. Greg Vurbeff
Subject: Response to City of Carlsbad Review Comments, 1854
Pentas Court, City of Carlsbad California
References:
Geotechnical Update Letter and Foundation Design Recommendations,
1854 Pentas Court, in the City of Carlsbad, California, by Pacific Soils
Engineering, Inc., dated October 7, 2008 (Work Order 401166)
Foundation Plan Review, 1854 Pentas Court, by Pacific Soils
Engineering, Inc., dated November 19, 2008 (Work Order 401166).
Gentlemen:
Presented herein is Pacific Soils Engineering, Inc.'s (PSE) response to the City of Carlsbad's
Review Comments (prepared by EsGil Corporation) for 1854 Pentas Court, located in the City of
Carlsbad, California. The review comments were based on information presented in the referenced
geotechnical update letter for the subject site. The review comment precedes this firm's response.
A copy of the review comment letter is attached.
Review Comment 16
In Seismic Design categories D, E, or F, the soils investigation must address liquefaction, and, if
retaining wails are proposed, the soils investigation must address increased loading on the wails
due to earthquake motions. Section 1802.2.7
PSE's Response
As stated in Section 3.0 of Reference 1, "The site is not withinan AP zone or in an area prone to
liquefaction." The site is underlain by compacted fill overlying the Del Mar Formation. Neither
CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS LOS ANGELES COUNTY RIVERSIDE COUNTY SOUTH ORANGE COUNTY TEL: (714) 220-0770 TEL: (310) 325-7272 or (323) 775-6771 TEL: (951) 582.0170 TEL: (714) 730-2122 FAX: (714) 220-9589 FAX: (714) 220-9589 FAX: (951) 582-0176 FAX: (714) 730-5191
4)
Work Orders 401166.
Attn: Mr. Greg Vurbeff Page 2
November 19, 2008
the fill nor the Del Mar Formation is considered susceptible to liquefaction. As such, the potential
for liquefaction is considered very low.
It is PSE's understanding that retaining walls will not be constructed onsite, therefore seismic
recommendations for walls does not need to be provided.
Review Comment 17
Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and
specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the
soils report are properly incorporated into the construction documents (when required by the soil
report)
PSE's Response
PSE has reviewed the foundation plans and specifications providedto this firm and a summary
letter has been prepared (Reference 2). A copy of the letter is attached.
If you have any questions or need any further information, please contact the undersigned.
Respectfully submitted,
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Reviewed by:
By:
SCOTT A. GRAY, RCE 673191
Manager of Geotechnical Services
Enclosure: Reference 2
Dist: (1) Addressee
0) Chris Robinson Designs, Attn: Chris Robinson
SAG/iA ftjz:40) 166. November 19.2008
A.
N67391
E:k
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
7715 CONVOY COURT. SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92111
TELEPHONE: (858) 560-1713, FAX: (858) 560-0380
GREG VURBEFF
1854 Pentas Court
Carlsbad, CA 92009
Qctobr1,QQL
Work Order 401166
Attention: ' Mr. Greg Vurbeff
Subject: Geotechnical Update Letter and Foundation Design
Recommendations, 1854 Pentas Court, in the City of
Carlsbad, California
References:
Composite Summary of Foundation Requirements for Residential Lots 2-43 incl., 45-134
incl., and 136-329 incl.; Tract 72-32, in the City of Carlsbad, California, by Pacific Soils
Engineering, Inc., dated January 11, 1976 (Work Order 100236A)
Preliminary Soil Engineering and Engineering Geologic Report and Grading Plan
Review, Carlsbad Tract No. 72-34, in the City of Carlsbad, California, by Pacific Soils
Engineering, Inc., dated July 5, 1974 (Work Order 100236).
Gentlemen:
Pursuant to your request, presented herein is Pacific Soils Engineering, Inc.'s (PSE) geotechnical
update letter and foundation design recommendations for 1854 Pentas Court, in the City of
Carlsbad, California. Grading for the subject lot was originally performed in 1976 under PSE's
observation and testing.
The following update letter and recommendations are based on review of the referenced reports,
a limited subsurface investigation performed by PSE, and associated laboratory testing. It is
PSE's opinion, from a geotechnical standpoint, that the subject lot is suitable for the construction
the two-story addition, provided that the recommendations presented in this report are
incorporated into the planning and site development. Included in this report. are: 1) engineering
characteristics of the onsite soils; 2) unsuitable soil removal recommendations; 3) foundation
design recommendations; and 4) :flatwork recommendations.
1.0 SITE LOCATION AND EXISTING CONDITIONS
The lot is located at 1854 Pentas Court in the City of Carlsbad, California. There is
currently a single-story residence with a two-story garage located on the lot. The
CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS LOS ANGELES COUNTY RIVERSIDE COUNTY SOUTH ORANGE COUNTY TEL: (714) 220-0770 TEL: (310) 325-7272 or (323) 775-6771 TEL: (951) 582-017 TEL: (714) 730-21 2 FAX: (714) 220-9589 FAX: (714) 220-9589 FAX: (951) 5820 FAX:115
I
4
Work Order 401166 Page 2
October 7, 2008
proposed addition will be located behind the existing garage. There is a small lawn area
and flatwork in the area of the proposed addition.
2.0 SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION
PSE conducted a limited subsurface investigation on the lot. One boring was excavated
with a hand auger (location shown on Plate 1) to a depth of five feet below existing
grade. A bulk sample was taken and returned to PSE's laboratory for testing.
3.0 GEOLOGY
Based on the hand auger excavation, there is a minimum of five feet of fill overlying the
building pad. The fill is composed of light gray brown silty sand, which is fine to
medium grained, slightly moist and medium dense. The log of the excavation is
presented in Appendix A. Based on a review of the referenced report, the existing fill
overlies the Dl Mar Formation.
The nearest active fault zone to the site is the Rose Canyon Fault Zone, located
approximately 9.5 kilometers (5.9 miles) away. The site is not within an AP zone or in
an area prone to liquefaction.
4.0 ENGINEERING CHARACTERISTICS
4.1 Expansion Potential
An expansion test was performed on a sample in accordance with ASTM Test
Method: D 4829-08 and the result is classified as "very low".
4.2 Earthwork Adjustments
The existing compacted fill onsite should not shrink or bulk appreciably when
removed and recompacted.
4.3 Chemical Analysis
A representative near-surface soil sample was obtained for sulfate testing. The
results of sulfate testing (conducted by others) indicate that the soil exhibits
"negligible" sulfate concentrations in accordance with AC1 318-05 Table 4.3.1
(per 2007 CBC). The chemical test result is presented in Appendix B.
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
Work Order 401166 Page 3
October 7, 2008
5.0 REMOVAL RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 Unsuitable Soil Removals
Vegetation, debris, and other deleterious materials are unsuitable to support the
proposed structure and should be disposed of off-site prior to construction. The
project geotechnical engineer or his representative should observe the foundation
excavations prior to the placement of concrete to determine that no unsuitable
soils are present.
5.2 Compaction Standards
Fill (if required) shall be compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 90
percent, as determined by ASTM Test Method: D 1557-02. Compaction shall be
achieved at slightly above the optimum moisture content and as generally
discussed in the attached Earthwork Specifications (Appendix Q. Mixing and
moisture conditioning will be required in order to achieve the required moisture
conditions. Fill should be placed in thin lifts (eight-inch bulk), moisture
conditioned to slightly above the optimum moisture content, mixed, compacted
and tested as grading progresses until final grades are attained.
6.0 FOUNDATION DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS
6.1 Foundation Design Criteria
The single-family residential structure addition can be supported on conventional
shallow foundations and slab-on-grade systems. The expansion potential of the
underlying soils is classified as "very low". The following values may be used in
the foundation design.
Allowable Bearing: 2000 lbs./sq.ft.
Lateral Bearing: 250 lbs./sq.ft. at a depth of 12 inches plus
125 lbs./sq.ft. for each additional 12 inches
embedment to-a maximum of 2000 lbs./sq.ft.
Sliding Coefficient: 0.35
Settlement: Total = 3/4 inch
Differential = 3/8 inch in 20 feet
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
4.
Work Order 401166 Page 4
October 7, 2008
The above values may be increased as allowed by Code to resist transient loads
such as wind or seismic. Building Code and structural design considerations may
govern. Depth and reinforcement requirements should be evaluated by the
Structural Engineer.
6.2 Seismic Design Parameters
The following seismic design parameters are presented to be code compliant to
the California Building Code (2007). The subject lot has been identified to be site
class "D" in accordance with CBC, 2007, Table 1613.5.3 (1). The lot is located at
Latitude 33.099' N and Longitude 117.267* W. Utilizing this information, the
computer program USGS Earthquake Ground Motion Parameters Version 5.0.7
and ASCE 7 criterion, the seismic design category for 0.20 seconds (S) and 1.0
second (Si) period response accelerations can be determined (CBC, 2007
1613.5.5.1) along with the design spectral response acceleration (CBC, 2007
16 13.5.4).
6.3 Conventional Foundation Systems
Based upon the onsite soil conditions and information supplied by the CBC-2007,
conventional foundation systems should be designed in accordance with Section
6.1 and Table 6 .1.
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
4
Work Order 401166 Page 5
October 7, 2008
TABLE 6.1
CONVENTIONAL FOUNDATION DESIGN PARAMETERS
Expansion Potential Very Low to Low
Soil Category
Footing Depth Below Lowest Adjacent Finish Grade
Two-Story Interior 18 inches
Two-Story Exterior 18 inches
Footing Width
Two-Story 15 inches
Footing Reinforcement
Two-Story No. 4 rebar, two (2) on top, two (2) on bottom or
No.5 rebar, one (I) on top, one (1) on bottom
Slab Thickness 4 inches (actual)
Slab Reinforcement No. 3 rebar spaced 18 inches on center, each way
Under-Slab A moisture and vapor retarding system should be placed below all slab-on-grade
Requirement within living areas and moisture sensitive areas as described by Section 6.4.
Slab Subgrade Minimum of 110 percent of optimum moisture prior to placing concrete.
Moisture
Footing Embedment Next to Swales and Slopes
If exterior footings adjacent to drainage swales are to exist within five feet horizontally of the swale, the footing
should be embedded sufficiently to assure embedment below the swale bottom is maintained. Footings adjacent to
slopes should be embedded such that a least seven feet are provided horizontally from edge of the footing to the
face of the slope.
Garages
A grade beam reinforced continuously with the garage, footings shall be constructed across the garage entrance,
Lying together the ends of the perimeter footings and between individual spread footings. This grade beam should
be embedded at the same depth as the adjacent perimeter footings. A thickened slab, separated by a cold joint from
the garage beam, should be provided at the garage entrance. Minimum dimensions of the thickened edge shall be
six (6) inches deep. Footing depth, width and reinforcement should be the same as the structure. Slab thickness,
reinforcement and under-slab treatment should be the same as the structure.
6.4 Moisture Barrier
A moisture and vapor retarding system should be placed below the slabs-on-grade
in portions of the structure considered to be moisture sensitive. The retarder
should be of suitable composition, thickness, strength and low permeance to
effectively prevent the migration of water and reduce the transmission of water
vapor to acceptable levels. Historically, a 10-mil plastic membrane, such as
Vis queen, placed between one to four inches of clean sand, has been used for this
purpose. The use of this system or other systems, materials or techniques can be
considered, at the discretion of the designer, provided the system reduces the
vapor transmission rates to acceptable levels.
PACIFIC 9011.9 ENGINEERING, INC.
Work Order 401166 Page 6
October 7, 2008
6.5 Exterior Slabs and Walkways
6.5.1 Subgrade Compaction
The subgrade below exterior slabs, sidewalks, driveways, patios, etc.
should be compacted to a minimum of 90 percent relative compaction as
determined by ASTM Test Method: D 1557-02.
6.5.2 Subgrade Moisture
The subgrade below exterior slabs, sidewalks, driveways, patios, etc.
should be moisture conditioned to a minimum of 120 percent of optimum
moisture content prior to concrete placement.
6.5.3 Slab Thickness
Concrete flatwork and driveways should be designed utilizing four-inch
minimum thickness.
6.5.4 Control Joints
Weakened plane joints should be installed on walkways at intervals of
approximately eight to ten feet. Exterior slabs should be designed to
withstand shrinkage of the concrete.
6.5.5 Flatwork Reinforcement
Consideration should be given to reinforcing any exterior flatwork.
6.5.6 Thickened Edge
Consideration should be given to construct a thickened edge (scoop
footing) at the perimeter of slabs and walkways adjacent to landscape
areas to minimize moisture variation below these improvements. The
thickened edge (scoop footing) should extend approximately eight inches
below concrete slabs and should be a minimum of six inches wide.
6.6 Concrete Design
As stated in Section 4.3, negligible concentrations of sulfates were detected in the
onsite soils. Therefore, per AC! 318-05, sulfate resistant concrete is not required.
4
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
4.
Work Order 401 166 Page 7
October 7, 2008
7.0 SLOPE AND LOT MAINTENANCE
As is the case with all developments, ongoing maintenance of the improvements is
essential to the long-term, performance of structures and slopes. The homeowners must
implement certain maintenance procedures. The attached "Homeowner Maintenance and
Improvement Considerations" presented in the Appendix D relates to slopes,
maintenance, backyard improvements, etc. The following recommendations should also
be implemented.
7.1 Slope Planting
Slope planting should consist of ground cover, shrubs, and trees that possess deep,
dense root structures and require a minimum of irrigation. The residents should
be advised of their responsibility to maintain such planting.
7.2 Lot Drainage
Roof, pad and lot drainage should be collected and directed away from structures
and slopes and toward approved disposal areas. Design fine grade elevations
should be maintained through the life of the structure or if design fine grade
elevations are altered, adequate area drains should be installed in order to provide
rapid discharge of water, away from structures and slopes. Residents should be
made aware that they are responsible for maintenance and cleaning of all drainage
terraces, downdrains, and other devices that have been installed to promote
structure stability.
7.3 Slope Irrigation
The resident and owner should be advised of their responsibility to maintain
irrigation systems. Leaks should be repaired immediately. Sprinklers should be
adjusted to provide maximum uniform coverage with a minimum of water usage
and overlap. Overwatering with consequent wasteful run-off and serious ground
saturation should, be avoided. If automatic sprinkler systems are installed, their
use mist be adjusted to account for natural rainfall conditions.
7.4 Burrowing Animals
Residents or owners should undertake a program for the elimination of burrowing
animals.
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
Work Order 401166 Page 8
October 7, 2008
8.0 FUTURE REVIEWS
It is recommended that PSE review the foundation plans once they are complete to
determine that they were prepared in conformance with the recommendations presented
in this report. Additionally, it is recommended that PSE observe the footing excavations
prior to the pouring of concrete to determine that the footings were excavated in firm and
unyielding material.
9.0 CLOSURE
9.1 Limitations
The recommendations presented in this report are based on the assumption that an
appropriate level of field review will be provided by Geotechnical Engineers and
Engineering Geologists who are familiar with the design and site geologic
conditions. PSE should be notified of any pertinent changes in the project plans
or if subsurface conditions are found to vary from those described herein. Such
changes or variations may require a re-evaluation of the recommendations
contained in this report.
The data, opinions and recommendations of this report are applicable to the
specific design of this project as discussed in this report. They have no
applicability to any other project or to any other location and any and all
subsequent users accept any and all liability resulting from any use or reuse of the
data, opinions and recommendations without the prior written consent of PSE.
PSE has no responsibility for constructionmeans, methods, techniques, sequences
or procedures, or for safety precautions or programs in connection with the
construction, for the acts or omissions of the CONTRACTOR or any other person
performing any of the construction, or for the failure of any of them to carry out
the construction in accordance with the final design drawings and specification.
PACIFIC BOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
Work Order 401166 Page 9
October 7, 2008
The opportunity to be of service is appreciated. Should you have any additional questions please
contact the undersigned.
Respectfully submitted,
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Reviewed by:
SCO GIt flE 67391 j
sident
HSONcEG99 Ir
Manager of Geotechnical Services
Dist: (4) Addressee
SAC/JAH:jz:401 166, October 7, 2008
(((
No.391
OF
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
FOUNDATION ADDENDUM & RETROFIT PLAN
SHEARNSLL REROFrT
I.
campWria mmmwrowtm III47T. ?WWOMCLPT.
Z WIIM.,.wMm Y1rMbEcnThnmww Mflanc UEIMU
a Lxof*L.Tl,asa
mmmvm IPBWpl.
4 W1IR.7rny.flaxtua..
PROJECT TEAM VICINITY ISTE MAP
PJECT DESCRIPTION I IESICIIS
LEGAL DESCRIPTION AREA TABULATIONS
,. IFLfl lIUO. a Tt TOT*L IJE I7.
TI )WGW
IEWTR1IWI IJ1IIIIIIIUJERE
SETBACKS IliLlIffil --MAPOMAMOKAM Ifl.
IIWWVA&ETOTI
V.1 ——
PROPOSED
CUSTOM REMODEL &
ADDITION
GREG &S%I VURBEFF
CARLSBAD
CALIFORNIA
I... LEGEND :
/ I--------- of ARTIFICIAL FILL
/ w HA—I APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF -
HAND AUGER EXCAVATION
A-1.O ii
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
7715 CONVOY COURT. SAN DIEGO, CA 92111
TELEPHONE: 858-560-1713 FAX: 858-560-0380
W.O. 401166 DATE: 10-7-08
APPENDIX A
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING INC.
Work Order 401166
October 7, 2008
Work Order 401166
Date Excavated 9/30/08
Excavated bySAG
Equipment Hand Auger
TABLEI
LOG OF TEST PITS
Test
Pit No. Depth (ft.) USCS Description
HA-1 0.0 -5.0 SM ARTIFICIAL FILL: SILTY SAND, light gray
brown, dry, medium dense.
2 it. slightly moist, some iron oxide staining.
2 ft. bulk sample
TOTAL DEPTH 5.0 FT.
NO WATER, NO CAVING
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
APPENDIX B
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
10/06/2008 15:30 9515820176 PACIFIC SOILS CORONA PAGE 02/62
OCT620øB 02:31P FROM:PRtME TESTING (951)892-2883 1ub8176 F.3
1 .
Prime Testing, Inc.
35572 lnnwmtlon Ct Ste IOZ Mwlata, CA 92&53
ph (951) 894.2902 • fx (051) 094-2803
Work Order No.: 8J1205
Client: Pacific Soils Eng. (Corona)
Project No; 401166
Project Name:
Report Date; October 6, 2008
j..aJortotIest[s1Resujt Summary
The subject soil sample was processed In accordance with California Test Method CTM 643
and tested for Sulfate Content (CTM 417). The test results follow:
Sulfate Sulfate
Sample Identification Content Content
(mglkg) (% by wgt)
TPA @ 2 20 0.002
aND_No Detection
We appreciate the opportunity to serve you. Please do not hesitate to contact us with any
questions or clarifications regarding these results or procedures.
-
Ahmet K. Kaya, L.abosatoTy Manager
r)7alesting .com
Form No. CP.IR
Rev .05/06
APPENDIX C
PACIFIC BOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
EARTHWORK SPECIFICATIONS
T se specifications present generally accepted standards and minimum earthwork requirements
for the develc.prnerit of the project. These specifications shall, be the project guidelines for
earthwork except where specifically superceded in preliminary geology and soils reports, grading
plan review reports or by prevailing grading codes or ordinances of the controlling .gency.
j: GENERAL
The contractor shall be responsible for the satisfactory completion of all
earthworks in accordance with the project plans and specifications
The project Soil Engineering Geologist or their representatives shall provide
testing services, and geotechnical consultation during the duration of the project
All clearing, grubbing, stripping and site preparation for the project shall be
accomplished by the Cbntractorto the satisfaction of the Soil Engineer.
It is the Contractor's responsibility to prepare the ground surface to receive the
fills to the satisfaction of the Soill Engineer and to place, spread, mix and compact
the fill in accordance with the job specifications and as required by the Soil
Engineer. The Contractor shall also remove all material considered by the Soil
Engineer to be unsuitable for use in the construction of compacted fill
The Contractor shall have suitable and sufficient equipment in operation to handle
the amount of fill being placed. When necessary, equipment will be shut down
temporarily in order to permit proper compaction of fills6.
LI. SITPREPAR)TION
A. Excessive vegetation and all deleterious material shall be disposed of offsite as
required by the Soil Engineer. Existing fill, soil, alluvium or rock materials
determthed by the Soil Engineer as being unsuitable for placement in compacted
fills shall be removed and wasted from the site Where applicable, the Contractor
may obtain the approval of the Soil Engineer and the controlling authorities for
the project to dispose of the above described materials, or a portion thereof, in
- designated areas onsite.
After removals as described above have been accomplished, earth materials
deemed unsuitable in their natural, in-place condition, shall be removed as
recommended by the Soil Engineer/Engineering Geologist.
Earthwork Specifications
Page 2-
After the removals are as delineated in Item II, A, above, the exposed surfaces
shall be disced or bladed by the Contractor to the satisfaction of the Soil Engineer.
The prepared ground surfaces shall then be brought to the specified moisture
condition, mixed as required, and compacted ad tested as specified. Ii areas
where it is necessary to obtain the approval of the controlling agency, prior to
placing fill, it will be, the contractor's responsibility to notify the proper
authorities.
Any underground structures such as cesspolls, cisterns, mining shafts, tunnels,
septic tanks, wells, pipelines or others not located prior to grading are to be
removed or treated in a manner prescribed by the Soil Engineer and/or the
controlling agency for the project.
M. COMPACTED FILLS
Any materials imported or excavated on the property may be utilized in the f11,
provided each material has been determined to be suitable by the Soil Engineer.
Deleterious material no disposed of during clearing or demolition shall be
removed from the fill as directed by the Soil Engineer.
Rock or rock fragments less than eight inches in the largest dimension may be
utilized in the fill, provided they are not placed in concentrated pockets and the
distribution of the rocks is approved by the Soil Engineer.
Rocks greater than eight inches in the largest dimension shall be taken ofsite, or
placed in accordance with the recommendations of the Soils Engineer in areas
designated as suitable for rock disposal.
All fills, including ogite and import materials to be used for fill, shall be tested in
the laboratory by the Soil Engineer. Proposed import materials shall be approved
prior to importation.
The fill materials shall be placed by the Contractor in layers that when compactei
shall not exceed six inches. Each layer shall be spread evenly and shall be
thoroughly mixed during the spreading to obtain a near uniform moisture
condition and a uniform blend of materials.
All compaction shall be achieved at optimum moisture content, or above, as
determined by the applicable laboratory standard. No upper limit on the moisture
content is necessary; however, the Contractor must achieve the necessary
compaction and will be alerted when the material is too wet and compaction
cannot be attained.
Vlir,i..'.iri SincificM.MP (r'.9
Earotk Specifications
Page ,3.,'
Where the moisture content of the fill material is below, the limit specified by the
Soil Engineer, water shall be added and the materials shall be blendd until
uniform moisture content, within specified limits, is achieved Where the
moisture content of the fill material is above the limits specified by the Soil
Engineer, the fill materials shall be aerated by discing, bladmg or other
satisfactory method until the moisture content is within the limits specified.
Each fill ]ayer'.shal.I be compacted to minimum project standards, in compliance
with the testing methods specified by the controlling governmental agency and in
accordance with recommendations of the Soil Engineer
In the absence of specific recommendations by the Soil Engineer tc the contrary,
the compaction standard shall be ASTM D 155741
IL Where a slope, receiving fill exceeds a ratio of five-horizontal to on-vertical; the
flU shall be keyed and benched through all unsuitable topsoil, colluvium,
alluvium, or creep material, into sound bedrock or firm material, 11" accordance
with the recommendations and approval of the Soil Engineer.
1 Side hill fills shall have a minimum key, width of 15 feet into bedrock or firm
materials, unless otherwise specified in the soil report and approved by the Soil
Engineer in the field.
Drainage terraces and subdrainage devices shall be constructed in ompliance
with the ordinances of the controlling governmental agency and/or with the
recommendations of the Soil Eigineer and Engineering Geologist.
The Contractor shall be required to maintain the specified minimum relative
compaction out to the finish slope face of fill slopes, buttresses, and stabilization
fills as dnected by the Soil Engineer and/or the governing..agency for the project
This may be achieved by either overbuilding the slope and cutting back to the
compacted core, or by direct compaction of the slope face with su table
equipment, or by any other compaction of the slope face with suitable equipment,
or by any other procedure, which produces the designated result.
L.. Fill-over-cut slopes shall be properly keyed through topsoil, colluviun, or creep
material into rock or firm material, and the transition shall be stripped of all, soil
.or unsuitable materials prior to placing fill.
The cut potion should beimad and evaluated by the Engineering. Geologist on
to placement of fill above.
M. Pad areas in natural ground and cut shall be approved by the Soil Engineer.
- Finished surface of these pads may be requiring scarification and recompaction.
ceUigwcs,s iw'sI .
Earthwork Specifications
Page4
TV. CUT SLOPE
A. The Engineering Geologist shaU inspect all cut slopes a1Tdsbafl be notified by the -
Contractor when cut slopes are started.
If during the course of gradi•n; unforeseen adverse or potentially adverse
geo}Qgic conditions are encountered, the Eiigineering Geologist and Soil Engineer
shall investigate, analyze and make recommendations to t'eat these problems
Non-erodible interceptor swales shall, beplaced at the top of cut slopes that face
the same direction as the prevailing drainage.
Unless otherwise specified in soil and-geological reports, no cut slopes shall be
excavated higher or steeper than- that allowed by the ordinances of controlling
governmental agencies.
Drainage terraces shall be constructed it compliance with the ordinances o:ftle
controlling, govermnentai agencies, an/or in accordance with the
recommendations of the Soil Engineer or En giiieering Geologist.
V. GRADING CONTROL
Fill placement shall be observed by the Soil Engineer an/or his representative
during the progress of grading.
Field density tests shall be made by the Soil Engineer or his representative to
evaluate the compaction and moisture compliance of layer of fill. Density tests
shall be performed at intervals no to exceed twoz feet off 11 height Where
sheepsfoot rollers are used, the soil may be disturbed to a.depth of several inches.
Density determinations shall be taken in the compacted material below the
disturbed surface at a depth determined by the Soil Engineer or his representative.
Where tests indicate that the density of any layer of H, o: port:on thereof, is
below, the required relative compaction, or improper moisture is in evidence, the
particular layer or portion shall be reworked until the required density and/or
moisture content has been attained No additional fill shall be placed over an area
until the last placed lift of fill has been tested and found to meet the density and
moisture requirements and that lift approved by the Soil Engineer.
Where the work in interrupted by heavy rains, fill operations shall not be resumed
until the field observations and tests by the Soil Engineer indicate the moisture
- content and density of the fill are-within the limits previoisly specified.
lV1EniiIiwn,1 Iiijm.inc'ri
Earthwork Specifications
Page 5
During construction, the Contractor shall properly grade all surfaces to maintain
good drainage and prevent ponding of water. The Contractor shall take remedial
measures to control surface water and tor prevent erosion of graded area until such
time as pennanent drainage and erosion control measures have been installed.
Observation and testing by the Soil Engineer shall be conducted during the filling
arid compacting operations in order that be will be able to state in his opinion all
cut and filled areas are graded in accordance with a approved specifications.
After completion of grading and after the Soil Engineer and Engineering
Geologist have finished their observations of the work, final reports shall be
submitted. No further excavation or filling shall be undertaken without prior
notification of the Soil Engineer and/or Engineering Geologist.
IV, SLO.'E PROTECTION
All finished cut and fill slopes shall be planted an/or protected from erosion in
accordance with the project specifications an/or as recommended by a landscape
architect.
M'IEr'I ,,,wI SnfpiH,s lnwJ
APPENDIX D
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
Work Order 401166
October 7, 2008
HOMEOWNER MAINTENANCE AND IMPROVEMENT CONSIDERATIONS
General
Homeowners purchasing property must assume a certain degree of responsibility for homeowner
improvements and for maintaining conditions around their home. Of primary importance are
maintaining drainage patterns and minimizing the soil moisture variation below all lot
improvements. Such design, construction and homeowner maintenance provisions may include:
> Employing contractors for homeowner improvements who design and build in
recognition of local building codes and specific site soils conditions.
> Establishing and maintaining positive drainage away from all foundations, walkways,
driveways, patios, and other hardscape improvements.
) Avoiding the construction of planters adjacent to structural improvements. Alternatively,
planter sides/bottoms can be sealed with an impermeable membrane and drained away
from the improvements via subdrains into approved disposal areas.
> Sealing and maintaining construction/control joints within concrete slabs and walkways
to reduce the potential for moisture infiltration into the subgrade soils.
> Utilizing landscaping schemes with vegetation that requires minimal watering. Watering
should be done in a uniform manner, as equally as possible on all sides of the foundation,
keeping the soil "moist" but not allowing the soil to become saturated.
> Maintaining positive drainage away from structures and providing roof gutters on all
structures with downspouts that are designed to carry roof runoff directly into area drains
or discharged well away from the foundation areas.
> Avoiding the placement of trees closer to the proposed structures than a distance of one-
half the mature height of the tree.
> Observation of the soil conditions around the perimeter of the structure during extremely
hot/dry or unusually wet weather conditions so that modifications can be made in
irrigation programs to maintain relatively uniform moisture conditions.
Sulfates
Homeowners should be cautioned against the import and use of certain inorganic fertilizers, soil
amendments, and/or other soils from offsite sources in the absence of specific information
relating to their chemical composition. Some fertilizers have been known to leach sulfate
compounds into soils otherwise containing "negligible" sulfate concentrations and increase the
sulfate concentrations to potentially detrimental levels, in some cases, concrete improvements
constructed in soils containing high levels of soluble sulfates may be affected by crystalline
growth or mineral accumulation, which may, in the long term, result in deterioration and loss of
strength.
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
Work Order 401166
October 7, 2008
Site Drainage
The homeowners should be made aware of the potential problems that may develop when
drainage is altered through construction of retaining walls, swimming pools, paved
walkways, patios or other hardscape improvements. Ponded water, drainage over the
slope face, leaking irrigation systems, overwatering or other conditions which could lead
to ground saturation must be avoided.
> No water should be allowed to flow over the slopes. No alteration of pad gradients
should be allowed that would prevent pad and roof runoff from being directed to
approved disposal areas.
> As part of site maintenance by the resident, all roof and pad drainage should be directed
away from slopes and around structures to approved disposal areas. All berms were
constructed and compacted as part of fine grading and should be maintained by the
resident. Drainage patterns have been established at the time of the fine grading should
be maintained throughout the life of the structure. No alterations to these drainage
patterns should be made unless designed by qualified professionals in compliance with
local code requirements and site-specific soils conditions.
Slope Drainage
> Residents should be made aware of the importance of maintaining and cleaning all
interceptor ditches, drainage terraces, downdrains, and any other drainage devices, which
have been installed to promote slope stability.
Subsurface drainage pipe outlets may protrude through slope surfaces and/or wall faces.
These pipes, in conjunction with the graded features, are essential to slope and wall
stability and must be protected in-place. They should not be altered or damaged in any
way.
Planting and Irrigation of Slopes
) Seeding and planting of the slopes should be planned to achieve, as rapidly as possible, a
well-established and deep-rooted vegetal cover requiring minimal watering.
It is the responsibility of the landscape architect to provide such plants initially and of the
residents to maintain such planting. Alteration of such a planting scheme is at the
resident's risk.
> The resident is responsible for proper irrigation and for maintenance and repair of
properly installed irrigation systems. Leaks should be fixed immediately.
Sprinklers should be adjusted to provide maximum uniform coverage with a minimum of
water usage and overlap. Overwatering with consequent wasteful runoff and serious
ground saturation must be avoided.
> If automatic sprinkler systems are installed, their use must be adjusted to account for
seasonal and natural rainfall conditions.
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING. INC.
& -
I
Work Order 401166
October 7, 2008
Burrowing Animals
' Residents must undertake a program to eliminate burrowing animals. This must be an
ongoing program in order to promote slope stability.
Homeowner Improvement
Homeowner improvements (pools, spas, patio slabs, retaining walls, planters, etc.) should be
designed to account for the terrain of the project, as well as expansive soil conditions and
chemical characteristics. Design considerations on any given lot may need to include provisions
for differential bearing materials, ascending/descending slope conditions, bedrock structure,
perched (irrigation) water, special geologic surcharge loading conditions, expansive soil stresses,
and long-term creep/settlement.
All homeowner improvements should be designed and constructed by qualified professionals
utilizing appropriate design methodologies, which account for the on-site soils and geologic
conditions. Each lot and proposed improvement should be evaluated on an individual basis.
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
DEC-01-2008 NON 03:13 PM CITY OF CARSLBAD FAX NO, 160 602 8558 P. 01
City of Ca r1sbad
B uilding Department
41
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
This form must be completed by the City, the applicant, and the appropriate school districts and returned to the City
prior to issuing a building permit. The City will not issue any building permit without a completed school fee form.
Project Name: VURBEFF RESIDENCE
Building Permit
Plan Check Number: CB081661
Project Address: 1854 PENTAS COURT
A.P.N
-
215-521-03.00
Project Applicant
(Owner Name): GREG AND KIM VURBEFF
Project Description: RESIDENTIAL ADDITION
Building Type: V-N
Residential: New Dwelling Units
Square Feet of Living Area in New Dwelling
Second Dwelling Unit: Square Feet of Living Area in SDU
Residential Additions: 929 Net Square Feet New Area
Commercial/Industrial: Ssare Feet Floor Area
City Certification of
Applicant Information:
Cl OF C
Date:
I RICTS WITHIN THE ARLSBAD —O
/badUnlfld School District Vista Uiuified School District San Marcos Unified School District
215 Mata Way lt Camrno Real 1234 Aicadia Drive San Marcos, CA 92069(290-2649) '
22 5
arisbad CA 92009 (33 1 .5000) Vista C.% 92083 (726-2170) Contact: Nancy Doice (By Appt. Only)
-_-
Enclnftae Union School District San Dkguito Union High School District
101 South Rancho Santa Fe Rd 710 Encinitas Blvd.
Encinitas, CA 92024 (944.4300 ext 166) Encinitas, CA 92024(753.6491)
Certification of AppllcantlOwners. The person executing this declaration COwner') certifies under penalty of perjury that (1) the
information provided above is c9are4nd true to the best of the Owners knowledge, and that the Owner will file an amended certification of payment and pathe aditlonal fee if Owner requests an increase in the number of dwelling units or square
footage after the building permit iJsst.&,d or if the initial determination of units or square footage is found to be incorrect, and that (2) the Owner is ther/de
2-
authorIzed to sign on be
per ofthbeve described project(s), or that the person executing this declaration is
Signature: Date: 2C'cO
Revised 3/30/2006
DEC-01-2008 NON 03:13 PN CITY OF CRRSLBAD FAX NO. 760 602 8558 P. 02
SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL FEE CERTIFICATION
(To be completed by the school district(s))
THIS FORM INDICATES THAT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE
PROJECT HAVE BEEN OR WILL BE SATISFIED.
SCHOOL DISTRICT:
The undersigned, being duly authorized by the applicable School District, certifies that the
developer, builder, or owner has satisfied the obligation for school facilities. This is to certify that
the applicant listed on page 1 has paid all amounts or completed other applicable school
mitigation determined by the School District. The City may issue building permits for this project.
SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED SCHOOL
DISTRICT OFFICIAL
- I ~ a - t' -, t "- -.;. C' LJ V-,
TITLE
NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT
DATE
PHONE NUMBER
CARLSBAD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICt
6225 EL CAMINO REAL
CARLSBAD, CA 920(19
/07— 0 R-0 t
q&o-33t.-.fLoL4F
Revised 313012006
GREGG C. VURBEFF
KIM L. VURBEFF
1854 PENTAS Cr
CARLSBAD, CA 92011-5137
1012
11-4288/1210 0650
Date '087358881998
WhF.gohr&N -.
ii'OOLOL20 •:&2&o2882,:E5O8?35888&qq8
CARLSBAD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT JEFFERSON ELEMENTARY 7 AVIARA OAKS ELEMENTARY
CARLSBAD HIGH SCHOOL F—IMAGNOLIA ELEMENTARY jAVIARA OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL Receipt No.
CARLSBAD VILLAGE ACADEMY E-I&LAVERA HILLS SCHOOL LI PACIFIC RIM 27599 LI VALLEY MIDDLE SCHOOL LI KELLEY SCHOOL LI CALA VERA HILLS MIDDLE SCHOOL
LI BUENA VISTA SCHOOL LI HOPE SCHOOL [J OTHER
4f"'4 'I U " Io ?-g' RECEIVED FROM: DATE:
(If Applicable) PARENT OF _f_8'9_tfrt+t1..!. _
L5•-I-__O
PAYMENT FOR: ACCOU_I NUMBER AMOUNT
________________________ 41 06 3,0
RECEIVED BY: CASH
•
CHECK # to TOTAL $
CB081661 1854 PENTAS CT
'F RES : 929 SF ADDITION!
ST FLR439 SF 2ND FLR, 10 SF BALCONY,
ACE
-
--L to/ T--2-y,STY-"c7'--r-rLo s,
tq)4)0 o4Fe.
-P C-L-ryl ' ff0
OL
nJ t jo 6&-u- CL.a'
i;'' seI4wd czo
)o o' hL.1d j1d pi&d
Approved Date Ov
Building I I 0 &
Planning
Engineering qji.i/og
Fire
Health / F.O.G.
HazMat/Air Quality
Comments Date
Building
Planning
r
%L1I3
Engineering
Fire
Forms/Fees Sent Recd Due? ffly
School C?_/2/ iJ;IosY N
CFD
PEF
PE&M
Special Insp. Y
Fire Y N
Sewer V1
Fees Complete
Application & Relaug Docs. Complete
110
/ 'A / 85°
SL-I FU steer A S EM.. tw4 0*::-
EM