Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1932 KELLOGG AVE; ; CB020361; Permit
City of Carlsbad 16~5 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 Commercial/Industrial Permit Permit No: CB020361 Building Inspection Request Line {760) 602-2725 Job Address: Permit Type: Parcel No: Valuation: Occupancy Group: Project Title: Applicant: 1932 KELLOGG AV CBAD Tl Sub Type: Lot#: 2121700400 $129,821.00 Construction Type: Reference #: LiFEMEDICAL-1,745 SF NEW 2ND ·INDUST 0 VN STORY OFFICE & 500 SF 1ST FLR-BATH & STAIRS Owner: Status: Applied: Entered By: Plan Approved: Issued: Inspect Area: ISSUED 02/05/2002 AMA 05/08/2002 05/08/2002 PS P & G CONSTRUCTION LA COSTA LIMOUSINE 2201 07/26/02 0002 Oi 02 P.O. 2518 VISTA CA 92085 760-729-7447 Total Fees: $1,397.54 Building Permit Add'I Building Permit Fee Plan Check Add'I Plan Check Fee Plan Check Discount Strong Motion Fee Park Fee LFM Fee Bridge Fee BTD #2 Fee BTD #3 Fee Renewal Fee Add'I Renewal Fee Other Building Fee Pot. Water Con. Fee Meter Size Add'I Pot Water Con. Fee Reel. Water Con. Fee Hl32 KELLOGG AV~ CARLSBAD CA 92008 Total Payments To Date: $1,337.54 Balance Due: $638.~6 $0.00 $415.32 $(1.00 $0.00 $21.26. · $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.60 $0.00 $60.00 $0..00 $0.00 $0.00 Meter Size . Add'I Reel.. Water Con. Fee Meter F13e · · SDCWAFee CFO Payoff Fee RFF PFF (CFO Fund) L:icense Tax License Tax (CFO Fund) Traffic Impact Fee . Traffic Impact ,(CFO Fund) PLUMBING TOTAL EL~CTRICAL TOTAL MECHANICAL TOTAL Master Drainage Fee Sewer Fee _ Redev Pc1.rking Fee Additional Fees TOTAL PERMIT FEES CG):::u 6{.LOO $60.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $69.00 $110.00 $77.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,397.54 Clearance: ------ NOTICE: Please·take NOT at proval of your project includes the "I osition" f~es, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as "fees/exactions.• You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued o protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures.seUorth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. FaHure to timely follow·that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protes!'the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or servic~ fees in connection with this project. NOR DOES IT APPLY to any f x i n f hi v r · I n i n N Tl imil · . r hi h i i i h r vi I rwi x ir . . ,, I ~4'2ri,3 PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008 Business Name ,(at this address) Legal Description Lot No. Subdivision Name/Number Name t5 .• L .. _gQ'11tl'!A'CTOR.e~OMP~NX~l't'I~• .. ·. :, , .. :, -··, .: '-"·"":_ , .. , : -~:.;., --~> .. .: .... ,; __ ~,:,--~_:,.:\.;;~,~,,...;;: ·~~::..:.~1.;..·~ .. :,:~:Tiw.:Sl~:! (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law [Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code] or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemp · • An violation-of Section 7031.5 by a~·applica_p;for a permit subjects the app~c~t to a civil penalty of J)Bt more t'12.n five hundred dollars ($502)). r -v.s·. r-o. ~ '/ r/15 C/1--7~ '8'5 · 'tfl--7 ·Name State License # _7_/~·-=-f-=,ia..,._b-'8'---~ Address B City State/Zip Telephone # License Class __ _;;;,_______ City Business License# / 2-,CJ 5J. 7,,:1 Designer Name Address City State/Zip Telephone State License#----~----- !~; -. :woR·iceas·c-0r,,J?']ijs'Ano1r---:-:-:-~-"'~---:""7·•--. ~.-.-.-.. -:::-, i-· • . .. · •• · .. vY' ... ·~•,%:\ 7~~-:,z;:;;::rz'::7. .. r:r:;.--:?. -.:.;,-.75-::,·r:~;., ;1 Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: 0 I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation ;is provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of-the work for·whil::h this permit is issued. D I have and will maintain workers' compe sation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My worker's COIT!pe sati~n insurance arrier and policy number are: 17 \'""l d I J ~ Insurance Company S 4. ..,J" 0-Policy No. l-2,_ '7-0C?> l O l lJ Expiration Date __ .__ -~-~~--- (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS [$100] OR LESS) D CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars ($1 ~000), in addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees. SIGNATURE 1'...,,_ . DATE ____ =----- \7.'0-7]>11\'NER~BUIL J:FioDECtARATIO~{:, c_ • .. ',:-."·:._ /·. "';,?' ..... ~'. ' '.'.'."'.'"'"'·~ ·: ·• 1·hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: 'D I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). D I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves th11reon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). 0 I am exempt under Section---~~-Business and Professions Code for this reason: 1. !·personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for, construction of the proposed property improvement. 0 YES ONO 2. I (hav!3 / have not) signed an application for a building.permit for the proposed·work. 3. I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): '4. I plan to provic;le portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone number/ contractors license number): _____________________________________________ _ ·5. I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type of work):, _______ ~--------------------------,-,------------------------ PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE __ __,.--------------~---.--DATE _________ _ fCOMPLETE.YAls :SECTION; FOB:NON:RESIPENllAOUILPJNG:,PE~II§':,ON,li:Y: ;,.;;;.~ ·· .. ,c, : '77,\;:.. "·"':. ·· :'. ·~' '' 'ii ,';. ,;,,;,:;"":;:""t" ':" "·,· '7; :a' ·fr".'"'.:~,~·: . c:, , ._.,,,, °Z ~~,~ Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? D YES D NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air qu<1lity management district? D YES D NO 'Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? D YES D NO .IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE 'REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. {82'cCt19$tRJJCTIOllttENOING AG!=NCY ,:r' '.,' >, .. , ·. ' ... ·· ··, ,I hereby affirm that' there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097(i) Civil Code). LENDER'S NAME .:;;;;;;;;;;;::;;:;.:::::::;;;:;;:;;=::;::;::;=:;:::::;::=::;:::;:;;::::::==..,.....:L::::E:.:.N:.,::DER'S ADDRESS fti,;:,,:,,\Al1,ei;°IPA1\1;'11&!:.f\T!ftq,~;r19,ij_ . -:,:~:_~~ ~ .' .... ,: ;,,,, ~-·'· "·., ..• ,·, ••. ; .. ~ ,:,.::;;.·, · , :·:./ .. ::.~,:,,·.,·· .~,"~: ..;,:::,;;,, ,·£~::•,:'li:.i-'.-i_,,,·;.,i~.\-~~;;_;;:;:;·,·.,;.; :i::..:'8:0~.:::;;:; ... ,.,L~~:-:;·;,::'~;:o:1 I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the infqrmation on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the Citt of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUEAGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized"by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such permit or ifthe building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is commen 'for a d of ays ection 1 6.4.4 Uniform Building Code). DATE ~r' !o ., APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE -~:;tl~~~Ljf.,l..~_!..,~~~~---------~ ___J} fj_ £..-./ WHITE: File YELLOW: Applicari.t PINK: Finance City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Reques For: 10/23/2002 Permit# CB020361 Inspector Assignment: PS --- Title: l,IFE MEDICAL-1,745 SF NEW 2ND Description: STORY OFFICE & 500 SF 1ST FLR-BATH & STAIRS Type:TI Job Address: Sub Type: INDUST 1932 KELLOGG AV Phone: 7608025107 Inspector:(~ Suite: Lot Location: APPLICANT P & G CONSTRUCTION Owner: LIFE PROPERTIES L L C 0 Remarks: CARD ON COUNTER-DOWN STAIRS IN OFC. Total Time: CD Description 19 Final Structural 29 Final Plumbing 39 Final Electrical 49 Final Mechanical -- Assbciated PCRs/CVs CV0:10575 CLOSED PCR02193 ISSUED lnst2ection Histoiy Date Description Act 10/21/2002 24 Rough/Topout NR . 10/18/2002 89 Final Combo co 09/30/2002 89 Final Combo co 09/06/2002 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding AP . 08/27/2002 84 Rough Combo co 08/07/2002 17 Interior Lath/Drywall CA 08/06/2002 17 lnterior·Lath/Drywall AP 08/05/2002 17 Interior Lath/Drywall co 08/01/2002 16 Insulation AP 07/39/2002 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding WC 07/30/2002 84 Rough Combo AP 07/29/2002 14 Frame/Steel/1;3olting/Welding co 07/26/2002 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding co 07/24/2002 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding co 07/24/2002 24 Rough/Topout co lnsp Comments PS PS STRAPS PS PS PS Requested By: NA Entered By: GIOVANNA PS DONE ON 8/6/2002 PS PS DO NOT TAPE-SCRAP & RECALL PS INSPECTED ON 7/31/2002 PS PS PS PS REINSP FEE DUE PS LOOSE HARDWARE, WATER CLOSET RINGS PS SEAL PENETRATIONS TOP/BOTTOM PLATES City of Carlsbad Bldg ln~pection Request For: 08/05/2002 Permit# CB020361 Inspector Assignment: PS --- Title: LIFE MEDICAL-1-,745 SF NEW 2ND Description: STORY OFFICE & 500 SF 1ST FLR-BATH & STAIRS Type:TI Job Address: Sub Type: INDUST 1932 KELLOGG AV Phone: 7608025107 Suite: Lot Location: APPLICANT P & G CONSTRUCTION Owner: LIFE PROPERTIES L L C Remarks: Total Time: CD Description 17 Interior Lath/Drywall 0 Inspector: ----- Requested By: NA Entered By: CHRISTINE Act Comments ao J)o mr ?RPe --sc~A-P o'-£kal/ Associated PCRs/CVs CV010575 CLOSED PCR02193 ISSUED lnsgection History Date Description Act lnsp Comments 07/30/2002 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding WC PS 07/30/2002 84 Rough Combo AP PS 07/29/2002 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding co PS 07/26/2002 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding co PS REINSP FEE DUE 07/24/2002 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding co PS LOOSE HARDWARE, WATER CLOSET RINGS 07/24/2002 24 Roughrropout co PS SEAL PENETRATIONS TOP/BOTTOM PLATES 07/24/2002 34 Rough Electric co PS 07/24/2002 44 Rough/Ducts/Dampers co PS FIRE DEPT APPROVAL 07/22/2002 84 Rough Combo co PS SEE NOTICE ATTACHED 07/18/2002 84 Rough Combo co PS STARTED D.W. W/O APPROVALS 07/17/2002 84 Rough Combo CA PS RESET FOR 7/18/02 07/05/2002 13 Shear Panels/HD's NR PS 05/15/2002 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PA RB SEE JOB PLANS 05/10/2002 21 Underground/Under Floor AP PS CilY or Carlsbad · Final Building Inspection Dept: Building Engineering Planning CMWD St Lite ~ Plan Check #: Permit#: CB020361 Project Name: LIFE MEDICAL-1,745 SF NEW 2ND STORY OFFICE & 500 SF 1ST FLR-BATH & STAIRS Address: · 1932 KELLOGG AV Lot: Contact Person: GARTH Phone: 76b8025107 Water Dist: CA Sewer Dist: CA Date: 09/30/2002 Permit Type: Tl Sub Type: INDUST 0 :~:~:i··~· .......... ~:;~ ............ ~ .. -:/""'" .................. ~ .................... .. By:, ~ Inspected: 'J--7( ~Approved: . Disapproved: __ Inspected Date By: ____________ Inspected: _____ Approved: __ Disapproved: __ Inspected Date By: Inspected: --'---___ Approved: __ Disapproved: __ , .......................................................................................... I!'••••···························································· Comments: --------------------------------------- EsGU Corporation an Partnersli.ip witli. (jovemment for '.Builaing Safety DATE: 5/1/02 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 02-361 PROJECT ADDRESS: 1932 Kellogg Ave. PROJECT NAME: Life Medical SET:IV ~~ANT ~ D PLAN REVIEWER D FILE D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes .. f:8:1 The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. D The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. . . D The applicant's ~opy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. D The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: f:8:1 EsgU. Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. D Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone#:· Date contacted: ~ (by: ()/1 Fax #: Mail Tele~· ho Fax I r~ f:8:1 · REMARKS: . The desig ated that city (Mr. Kelley) consider the exits from the upper floor adequate. ase verify. lease slip revised sheet A4, A5, S3, S6, E1 and E2 into the City II set.(at building departm . 3. The inked changes on sheets E1, E2, M3 and M4 shall be made on City II set.(at building department) · By: David Yao Enclosures·: Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC log trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858) 560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 .. DATE: 4/26/02 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 02-361 EsGil' Corporation 'l:n Partnersli.ip witli. (jo'Vemment for '.Builaing Safety SET: III PROJECT ADDRESS: 1932 Kellogg Ave. PROJECT NAME: life Medical D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. D The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. [g'J The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. [g'J The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: P + G Construction P.O.Box 2518, Vista, CA 92085 0 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. [g'J Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: P+G Construction Telephone#: (760)802-5107 Date contacted:'-{'/ 2~/02-(by: ~A~) Fax #: (760)729-7447 Mail ~phone D REMARKS: By: David Yao Fa~ In Person Esgil Corporation D GA ,D MB l8:I EJ D pc Enclosures: 4/18 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858) 560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad 02-361 III 4/26/02 RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PR.OJECT ADDRESS: 1932 Kellogg Ave. DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 4/18 REVlf:WED BY: David Yao FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): PLAN CHECK NO.: 02-361 SET: III DATE RECHECK COMPLETED: 4/26/02 This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. . · Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. A. To facUitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet. has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. "' Carlsbad 02-361 III 4/26/02 B. The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews. The original correction number has been given for your reference. In case you did not keep a copy of the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding corrections. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items. C. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? DYes DNo Carlsbad 02-361 III 4/26/02 . 7,8,9 The designer stated that city (Mr. Kelley) consider the exits from the upper floor adequate. Please verify. PLUMBING, MECHANICAL AND ENERGY CORRECTIONS PLAN REVIEWER: Glen Adamek/Eric Jensen MECHANICAL (1997' UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE) 1. Provide smoke detection in supply air duct of 'air-moving system' for required shut-off for smoke control as per UMC, Section 608 and also see Section 203. "Air-moving system is a system designed to provide heating, cooling, or ventilation in which one or more air-handling units are used to supply air to a common space or to draw air from a common plenum or space." Please provide the required smoke detection in supply air duct of 'air-moving system' for required shut-off for smoke control as per UMC, Section 608 and also see Section 203. Include the installation location of the duct detectors: The actual units that will require them and where on the units they are to be installed. ENERGY CONSERVATION 11. The envelope, -lighting and mechqnical sections of the PERF-1 form must be signed by the licensed individual responsible for the design. Not signed. No revised PERF-1 was provided. 2. Provide automatic shut-off controls' for lighting as per Title 24, Part 6, Section 131 (d). (5,000 square foot exemption has been eliminated-AB 970 energy design change). Provide the design for compliance. Note: If you have any questions regarding this Plumbing, Mechanical, and Energy plan review list please contact Glen Adamek/Eric Jensen at (858) 560- 1468. To speed the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans. A'tex -~ ARCHITECTURAL TECHNICAL EXPRESS 1521 Sunrise Drive, Vista, California 92084 Phone: (760) 732-3648 DATE: TO: ATTENTION: PLAN CHECK NO.: ADDRESS: PROJECT: April 15, 2002 EsGil Corporation David Yao 02-361 1931 Kellogg Ave. Life Medical T.I. CC: Carlsbad City Building Department Garth Packard PLAN RECHECK The following are in response to your review comments. The item numbers listed herein ( excepting part E -Additional Drawing Changes) correspond with your review #1 comments numbers. The item numbers listed in brackets ( ) correspond with your review #2 comments numbers. A. :PLAN CHECK BY DAVID YAO 7. DONE ---Per approval of Pat Kelley, provided an exit walkway, as shown on drawing A4 and keyed note 19 and added keyed notes 20, 21 and 22. The exit walkway has pipe bollards, safety chain and signage as noted. See drawing S6 and added detail 5. 8. DONE ---Per approval of Pat Kelley, provided door at 2nd floor corridor to separate north and sou,th portions of the building thus making the area served by the east exit door to be the office area only. Widened the corridor to accommodate a door with the required 18" side clearance. Changed drywall to type "X" drywall. See drawing A5 and revised keyed notes 7 and 8. 9. DONE ---Same as above item 7. 20. DONE ---Refer to attached soils report. 21. DONE ---According to the soils engineer the near-source type is Band the near-source factor is Na= 1.00 and Ny= 1.02 ; however the near-source factor is not included in the soils report since the soils report was written prior to the li~ting of the near-source factor being a requirement (also see drawing S3 Jiote 31). 22. DONE ---Soil is type H olive gray brown clayey sand per soils report page 3 and the classification is SM-SC (also see dtawingS3 note 32). Soils expansion index is 54 per soils report page 4 (also see drawing S3 note 33). Design bearing capacity is 2,250 psffor isolated footings and 2,000 psffor continuous footings per soils report page 12 (also see drawings S3 note25). · 23. DONE --~ Refer to soils report page 6, article "Other Hazards Considered". 24. NOT APPLICABLE ---The soils report recommends a review by the soils engineer but does not require a letter from the soils engineer. Refer to soils report page 18, article "Plan Review." B. PLUMBING, MECHANICAL AND ENERGY PLAN CHECK BY GLEN ADAMEK 10 (1). DONE ---See drawing M4 revfaed note 21 and "SD" at detail 1/M4. I la (11). DONE ---Signed spaces fqr envelope, lighting and mechanical compliance See revised PERF- 1 page 3 (part 1 or 3). 11 b (2). DONE ---See drawing A4 revised keyed note 15 anq drawing A5 revised keyed note 11. 12 (3). DONE ---See drawin~ E4 revised lighting note 1. D. ASSESSABILITY PLAN CHECK 7 (1). DONE ---Designated area at 1st floor for hangicapped office and display area. See drawing A4 and added keyed note 23. 1 E. ADDITIONAL DRAWING CHANGES 1. Added fire .extinguishers, per Fire Department requirements, op. drawings A4 (keyed note 24) and AS (keyed note 14). 2. Added emergency egress lighting, per Fire Department requirements, on drawings El (keyed note 13) andE2 (keyed note 13). 2 r- ./ ATE: 4/1/02 JURISDIC1ION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 02-361 EsGil Corporation 1n Partnersnip witn (jovemment for 'lJuilaing Safety SET: II PROJECT ADDRESS: 1932 Kellogg Ave. PROJECT NAME: Life Medical T.I. D APPLICANT CCJURISJ D PLAN REVIEWER D FILE D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. · D The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies -identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. [g] The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person .. ~ The c;1pplicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: P + G Construction P.O.Box 2518, Vista, CA 92085 D Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. C8:J Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: P + G Construction Telephone#: (760)802-5107 Date contacted:4-2-oz.. (by:b~) Fax #: (760)729-7447 Mail ..,,,,,,. Telephone D REMARKS: By: David Yao Fax ......,. In Person · Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC Enclosures: 3/21 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858) 560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad 02-361 II 4/1/02 RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 1932 Kellogg Ave. DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 3/21 REVIEWED BY: David Yao FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): · PLAN CHECK NO.: 02-361 SET: II DATE RECHECK COMPLETED: 4/1/02 this plan review is limited to the technical requirements contai·ned in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items rr:tust be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building.Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by ·the City Planning, Engineering and Fire pepartments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. A. To facilitate rechecking, please identify;·next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this. sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. B. The following items· have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews. The original correction number has been given for your reference. In case you did not keep a copy of Carlsbad 02-361 II 4/1/02 the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding corrections. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items. C. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? DYes DNo Carlsbad 02-361 II 4/1/02 7. t:xits shall not p~ss through kitchens, store rooms, or spaces used for similar purposes. Section 1004.2.2. The exits from upper floor do not comply with the requirements in item 7,8,9. Please provide revised plan or check with city building department. 8. Exits should have a minimum separation of-one-half the maximum overall diagonal dimension of the building or area served. Section 1004.2.4.(The closet point of the two stairw~y will be the separation of the two exit. It appears to the two stairs are too close together.) 9. The maximum number of required exits and their required separation must be maintained until egress is provided from the structure. Section 1004.2.3.1. 20. Provide a copy of the project soil report. prepared by a California licensed architect or civil engineer. The report shall include foundation design recommendations based on the engineeris findings and shall comply with UBC Section 1804.(Esgil Corp. does not keep any soil report. By using 2250 psf allowable bearing pressure, soil report must be provided to justify it.) 21. In Seismic Zone 4, each site $hall be assigneq a near-source factor. Identify this value in the soils report ~nd on the plans. Section 1629.4.2. 22. Specify on the foundation plan or structural specifications sheet the soil classification, the soil$ expansion index and the design bearing capacity of the foundation. Section 106.3.3. 23. Investigate the potential for seismically induced soil liquefaction and so'il instability in seismic zones 3 and 4. Section 1804.5 ~ 24. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soil report are properly incorporated into the plans. (When required by the soii report). DEPARTMENT OF STATE ARCHITECT TITLE· 24 DISABLED ACCESS REQUIREMENTS 1. Elevator access must be provided to upper and levels, unless it can be shown that an exception in Section 1103B.1 is applicable.(Provide office and displace at lower floor.) Provide office and displace space at lower floor otherwise elevator is · required to Upper floor. Carlsbad 02-361 II 4/1/02 PLUMBING, MECHANICAL AND ENERGY CORRECTIONS PLAN REVIEWER: Glen Adamek/Eric Jensen MECHANICAL (1997 UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE) 1. Provide smoke detection in supply air duct of 'air-moving system' for required shut-off for smoke control as per UMC, Section 608 and also see Section 203. "Air-moving system is a system designed to provide heating, cooling, or ventilation in which one or more air-handling units are used to supply air to a common space or to draw air from a common plenum or space." Please provide the required smoke detection in supply air duct of 'air-moving system' for required shut-off for smoke control as per UMC, Section 608 and also see Section 203. Include the installation location of the duct detectors: The actual units that will require them and where on the units they are to be installed. ENERGY CONSERVATION 11. The envelope, lighting and mechanical sections of the PERF-1 form must be signed by the licensed individual responsible for the design. Not signed. 2. Include, on the plans, for all window and skylight types, a complete fenestration description detailing compliance with the required AB 970 modifications.to the 1998 Title 24 requirements. The description shall include the following applicable information: Information not pr9vided on the plans. Note: Existing windows and new windows will both need to be summarized if using the performance envelope method. a) Type of product: Manufactured or site assembled. b) The U-factor and the SHGC ratings. c) The method of certification: NFRC label, NFRC certification available at site, SHGC(fen) calculation method, or a CEC Default label. d) For site-assembled or non-certified fenestration also include a description of the assembly (frame type and glazing type) used for each type. 3. Provide automatic shut-off controls for lighting as per Title 24, Part 6, Section 131 (d). (5,000 square foot exemption has been eUminated-AB 970 energy design change). Provide the design for cqmpfiance. Note: If you have any questions regarding this Plumbing, Mechanical, and Energy plan review list please contact Glen Adamek/Eric Jensen at (858) 560- 1468. To speed the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans. · EsGil Corporation 1n Partnersli.ip witli. (jovernment for· '13uiftling Safety DATE: 2/20/02 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 02-361 PROJECT ADDRESS: 1932 Kellogg Ave. PROJECT NAME.: Life Medical T.I. SET:I CJ~CANT CJ~ CJ PLAN REVIEWER CJ FILE D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. · D The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply With the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below c;ire resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resub_mitted for a complete recheck. 1:8] The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corpbration until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. 1:8] The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: P + G Construction P.O.Box 2518, Vista, CA 92085 D Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the pl.an check has been completed. 1:8] Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that th·e plan check has been completed . .Person contacted: P + G Construction Telephone#: (760)802-5107 Date,contacted: 2-)2.ol 0 2(by: K ) Fax#: (1CoD) l L'7.1Y~?, Mail "----Telephone-Fax v-----In Person D REMARKS: By: David Yao Enclosures: Esgil Corporation [8] GA [81 MB D EJ D PC 2/7 trnsmtLdot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858) 560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad 02-361 2/20/02 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST TENANT IMPROVEMENTS PLAN CHECK NO.: 02-361 OCCUPANCY: B/M/S-1 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V-N . ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA: 32000 sf SPRINKLERS?: Y REMARKS: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY .JURISDICTION: DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED: 2/20/02 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): JURISDICTION: Carlsbad USE: office/retail/ storage ACTUAL AREA: 7525 sf STORIES: 2 HEIGHT: OCCUPANT LOAD: -13 DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 2/7 PLAN REVIEWER: David Yao This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on la~s and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, F·ire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Code sections cited are based on the 1997 UBC. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building· Code, the approval of the· plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy} where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be .sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. TENANT IMPROVEMENTS WITHOUT SPECIFIC ENERGY DATA OR POLICY SUPPLEMENTS (1997UBC) tiforw.dot Carlsbad 02-361 2/20/02-. Please make al.I corrections on the original tra.cings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for cdmmercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected s.ets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one·corrected set of pl_~ns .and calcu_lations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plan's that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will. not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. • PLANS 1'. All sheets of the plans and the fir~t sheet of the calculations are required to be signed by the California licensed architect or engineer responsible for the plan preparation. Please include the California license number, seal, date of license expiration and the date th.e plans are signed. Business and Professions Code. 2. On the cover sheet of the plans, specify any items requiring special inspection, in a format similar to that shown below. • REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS In addition to the regular.inspections, the following checked items will also require Special Inspection in accordance with Sec. 1701 of the Uniform Building Code. ITEM FIELD WELDING DESIGNER-SPECIFIED OTHER RE:QUIRED? REMARKS 3. When special inspection is required, ·the architect or engineer of record shall prepare an inspection program which.shall be submitted to the building official for approval prior to issuance of the building permit. Please review Section 106.3.5. Please complete the. attached form. • SITE PLAN 4. Clearly dimension building setbacks from property lines, street centerlines, and from all adjacent buildings and structures on the site plan. Carlsbad 02-361 2/20/02 5. Provide a statement on the site plan stating: "All property lines, easements and buildings, both existing and proposed, are shown on this site plan." • BUILDING AREA 6. Provide area analysis to show the total floor area (new plus existing) still within the allowable floor area. Section 504.3. • EXITS 7. Exits shall not pass through kitchens, store rooms, or spaces used for similar purposes. Section 1004,.2.2. 8. Exits should have a minimum separation of one-half the maximum overall diagonal dimension of the building or area served. Section 1004.2.4.(The closet point of the two stairway will be the separation of the two exit. It appears to the two stairs are too close together.) 9. The maximum number of required exits and their required separation must be maintained until egress is pro:-,tided from the structure. Section 1004.2.3.1. 10. . Note on the plans: "All. exits are to be openable from inside without the use of a key or special knowledge." In lieu of the above, in a Group B, F, Mor S occupancies, you may note "Provide a sign on or near the exit door, reading THI$ DOOR TO REMAIN UNLOCKED DURING BUSINESS HOURS." This . signage is only allowed at the main exit. Section 1003.3.1.8. • STAIRWAYS 11. Stairway riser must be 4 inches minimum and 7 inches maximum and minimum run shall be 11 inches. Section 1003.3.3.3. See the exception for private stairways serving less than 10 occupants.(Show the rise for all stairways on the plan.) 12. Handrails (Section 1003.3.3.6): Note: Where access for the disabled is necessary, Title 24 requires handrails on both sides to extend 12 inches beyond the top nosing and 12 inches plus the tread width beyond the bottom nosing. • EXIT SIGNS 13. Exit signs are required whenever two ·exits are required. Show all required exit sign locations. Section 1003.2.8.2. · 14. If exit signs are required, provide the following notes on the plans, per Section 1003.2.8.2: Carlsbad, 02-361 2/20/02 a) b) Exit signs shall be located as necessary to clearly indicate the direction of egress travel. No point shall be more than 100 feet from the nearest visible sign. Exit signs shall be readily visible from any direction of approach. 15. St:iow two sources of power for the lamps at exit signs. Section 1003.2.8.5. • MISCELLANEOUS LIFE/SAFETY 16. Provide details of restrooms to show compliance with ,Section 807 regarding floors, walls. 17. Note on the plans that suspended ceilings shall comply with USC Tables 25-A and 16-0. 18. Note on the plans that new water closets arid associated flushometer valves, if any, shall use no more than 1.6 gallons per flush and shall meet performance standards established by the American National Standards Institute Standard A112.19.2. H & S Code, Section 17921.3(b). • TITLE 24 DiSABLED ACCESS 19. Provide notes and details on the plans to show compliance with the enclosed Disabled Access Review List. Disabled access requirements may-be more rest~ictive than the USC. · • FOUNDATION 20. Provide ~ copy of the project soil report prepared by a California licensed architect or civil engineer. The report shall include foundation design recommendations based on the engineer's findings and shall comply with USC Section 1804. · 21. in· Seismic Zone 4, each site shall be assigned a near-source factor. Identify this vall:le in the soils report and on the plans. Section 1629.4.2. 22. Specify on the foundation plan or structural .specifications sheet the soil classification, the soils expansion index and the design bearing capacity of the foundation. Section 106.3.3. 23. Investigate the potential for seismically induced soil liquefaction and soil instability in seismic zones 3 and 4. Section 1804.5 24. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming·that the foundation plan, grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soil report are properly incorporated into the plans. (When required by the soil report). Carlsbad 02-361 2/20/02 2.5. The soils engineer recommended that he/she review the foundation excavations. Note on the foundation plan that "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building Department foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the building official in writing that: a) The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report, b) The utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and c) The foundation excavations comply with the intent of the soils report." 26. The following anchor bolt requirements shall apply in Seismic Zones 3 and 4, per Section 1806.6.1: 27. 28. 29. a) The minimum nominal anchor bolt diameter shall be 5/8-inch (for Seismic Zone 4 only). Note: This will require a minimum distance from the ends of sill plates to be 4-3/8" (and a maximum of 12"). b) Plate·washers (minimum size of 2" x 2" x 3/16") shall be used on each anchor bolt. Specify size, ICBO number.and manufacturer of power driven pins, expansion anchors or epoxy anchors. Show edge, end distance and spacing. Section 106.3.3. Show size, embedment and location of hold down anchors on foundation plan. Section 106.3.3. Note on the plans that hold down anchors must be tred in place prior to foundation inspection. Section 108.5.2. • STRUCTURAL 30. Show double top plate with minimum 48" lap splice. Section 2320.11.2. 31. Show nailing will be in compliance with Table 23--1 I-B-1. 32. . In Seismic Zones 3 and 4, where allowable shear values exceed 350 plf in wood structural panel shear walls, foundation sill plates and all framing members receiving edge nailing from abutting panels shall not he less than a single 3" nominal member. In shear walls whe.re the total wall design shear does not exceed 600 plf, a single 2" nominal sill plate may be used, provided the anchor bolts are designed for a load capacity of 50% or less of the allowable capacity. Plywood joint and sill plate nailing shall be staggered in all cases. Table 23-11-1- 1 , footnote 3. 33. Sheet 1 of the calculation shows the HIL Tl bolts embedded 41/2". Please add on not 10 sheet S7. 34. Please provide more detail calculation to show the seismic factor is 0.279 W. (what kind of R value been used? What kind of Ca factor been used? Etc) Does this factor comply with USC 1630.2.3.(simplified method?) Carlsbad 02-361 2/20/02 35. The lower floor shear wall shall resist the lateral force from the roof too. The shear force at lower floor is more than just the lateral force from the floor. Please revise the calculation. 36. Provide calculation to show the hold down anchors shown on the foundation plan are adequate to resist the proper uplift force. 37. The foundation location appears to not complete match between the framing plan and foundation .plan. Please check. 38. Provide construction detail for the stairway at stair #2. 39. Provide detail to show how the new beam 4 and 8 connect to existing wall.(reference from the floor framing plan) 40. The construction detail for the new opening in the existing tilt-up wall shall be clearly specified on the plan and referenced. . . • ADDITIONAL 41. Please refer to the following corrections for mechanical, plumbing, energy and electrical items. 42. To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. 43. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: D Yes Cl No 44. The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact David Yao at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. Carlsbad 02-361 2/20/02 PLUMBING, MECHANICAL AND ENERGY CORRECTIONS PLAN REVIEWER: Glen Adamek 1. Each sheet of the plans must be signed by the person responsible for their preparation, even though there ·are no structural changes, before the permits are issued. Business and Professions Code. 2. Provide data on any proposed hazardous material to be stored and used. UBC, Section 307 and UFC. PLUMBING (1997 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE) 3. The DWV isometric plan found on sheet M5 shows that there are no vents for the water closets. 4. $how water heater size, type and location on plans. UPC, Section 501.0 5. Show that water heater is adequately braced to resist seismic forces. Provide two straps. One strap at top 1 /3 of the tank and one strap at bottom 1 /3 of the tank. UPC, Sectiqn 510.5 6. Show P & T valve on water heater and detail drain line route from P & T valve to the exterior. UPC Section 608.5 7. Detail required ladder access to water heaters rnore than 8 feet above the floor. UPC section 511.2. ". 8. Show 1/4 inch per 12 inch slope on drain and waste lines. UPC Section 708.0 MECHANICAL (1997 UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE) 9. Detail required roof access ladder to roof mounted HVAC equipment. UMC, Section 307.5-. 10. Provide smoke detection in supply air duct of 'air-moving system' for required shut-off for smoke control as per UMC, Section 608 and also see Section 203. "Air-moving system is a system designed to provide heating, cooling, or ventilation iri which one or more air""handling units are used to supply air to a common space or to draw air from a common plenum or space." Please provide the required smoke detection in.supply air duct of 'air-moving system' for required·shut-off for smoke control as per UMC, Section 608 and also see Section 203. Carlsbad 02-361 2/20/02 ENERGY CONSERVATION 11. The envelope, lighting and mechanical sections of the PERF-1 form must be signed by the licensed individual responsible for the design. 11. Include, on the plans, for all window and skylight types, a complete fenestration description detailing compliance with the required AB 970 modifications to the 1998 Title 24 requirements. The description shall include the following applicable information: a) Type of product: Manufactured or site assembled. b) The U-factor and the SHGC ratings. c) The method of certification: NFRCJabel, NFRC certification available at site, SHGC(fen) calculation method, or a CEC Default label. d) For site,.assembled or non-certified fenestration also include a description of the assembly (frame type and glazing type) used for each type. 12. Provide automatic shut..,off controls for lighting as per Title 24, Part 6, Section 131-(d). (5,000 square foot,exemption has been eliminated-AB 970 energy design change). Note: If you have any questions regarding this Plumbing, Mechanical, and .Energy plan-review list please contact Glen Adamek at (858) 560-1468. To speed the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans. + ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW + 1996 NEC + PLAN REVIEWER: Morteza Beheshti 1. Show or note on the plans the method used to limit fault currents to 10,000 amps on branch circuits. 2. Specify the wire type (AL orCU) and insulation (i.e. THWN). NEC 310. 3. Specify the wiring method you ir:itend to use for this project. Indicate the type of conduit to be used when .exposed or buried underground, etc. (i.e., EMT, Metal Flex, NMC etc.). NEC 110-3(a) and (b). 4. Show the location of the main service. Draw the service location. NEC 110- 16,240-24,300-21 5. Provide the alternate source of power for the essential electrical equipment in this medical building. NEC 517-50 Carlsbad 02-361 2/20/02 6. Provide GFI protected receptacle(s) within 25 feet of HVAC equipment. NEC 210- 8(b)2 & 210-63. 7.. Show exit signs on the lighting plan(s) at all required exits and specify them as being self-luminous or having a second source of power (battery or generator). This is required when two exits are required per the USC. USC 1003.2.8.2 and NEC 700- 16. '8. In all occupancies where the exit system serves 100 or more occupants, provide a minimum of 1 foot-candle of emergency illumination at the floor level and specify a second source of power for the emergency illumination (battery or generator). UBC 1003.2.9.2 & NEC 700-16. . . 9. Each commercial building and each commercial occupancy accessible to pedestrians shall be provided with at least one outlet in an accessible location at each entrance to each tenant space for sign ·or outline lighting system use. NEC 600-5(a). 10. Each sheet of the electrical plans must be signed by the person responsible for their preparation. Business and Professions Code. 11 :Provide a disconnect for each sign. NEC 600-6. 12, If utilizing a series-rated system, note on plans: "Overcurrent device enclosures will be identified as series-rated and labeled in accordance with NEC 110-22" and " The overcurrent devices shall be AIC rated per manufacturers. labeling of the electrical equipment". Note: If you have any questions regarding this electrical plan review list please contact Morteza Beheshti at (858) 560 .. 1468. To speed the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans. DEPARTMENT OF STATE ARCHITECT TITLE 24 DISABLED ACCESS REQUIREMENTS • REMODELS, ADDITIONS AND REPAIRS 1. When alterations, structural repairs or modifications or additions are made to an existing building, that building, or portion of the building affected, is required to comply with all of the requirements for new buildings, per Section 11348.2. These requirements apply as follows: a) The area of specific alteration, repair or addition must comply as "new" construction. Carlsbad 02-361 2./20/0~ b) A primary entrance to the building and the primary path of travel to the altered area, must be shown to comply with all accessibility features. • SITE PLAN REQUIREMENTS 2. Show, or note that at every primary public entrance, and at every major function area along, or leading to, an accessibll;:l route of travel, there is to be a sign displaying the international symbol of accessibility. Signs are required to indicate the direction to accessible building entrances and facilities, per Sections 1117B.5.7 and 11278.3. CURB RAMPS 3. The slope of the fanned or flared sides of curb ramps shall not exceed ~1 :1 O. per Section 11278.5.4. · • WALKS AND .SIDEWALKS 4. . Walks along an accessible route of travel are required to be ~48" minimum· in width and have slip resistant surfaces, per Section 11338.7. 5. $how or note that any abrupt level changes will be s½" along any accessible route of travel. When changes do occur, they shall be beveled with a slope of s1 :2. Level changes of s¼" may be vertical. NOTE: If level changes>½", they must comply with the requirements of curb ramps. 6. Show that a 60" x 60" l~vel area is provided at areas where a door(or gate) swings toward the walk in the accessible route oftravel, per Section 1133B.7.5. Show that the walk extends ~24" beyond the strike edge of the strike edge of·any door(or gate) that swings toward the walk. • ENTRANCES AND CIRCULATION 7. Elevator access-must be provided to upper and levels, unless it can be shown that an exception in Section 1103B.1 is applicable.(Provide office and displace at lower floor.) . • DOORS 8. Show that the minimum strike edge distances are provided at the level area on the side to which a door (or a gate) swings, per Section 1133B.2.4.3: a) ~18" at interior conditions.(door 14at first floor?) • STAIRWAYS AND HANDRAILS Carlsbad 02-361 2/20/02 9. Show that handrails extend a ~12" beyond top nosing, and ~12"-plus-tread-width _ beyond the bottom nosing, per Section 1133B.4.2.2. 10. Show or note that interior stair treads are marked at the upper approach and the lower tread of each stair, by a strip of clearly contrasting color, per Section 1133B.4.4, as follows: a) At least 2" wide (but not more than 4" wide). b) Placed parallel to and not more than 1" from the nose of the step or la_nding. c) The strip shall be as slip resistant as the other treads of the stair. 11. Note that all tread surfaces comply with Section 1133B.4.5, as follows: a) S~air treads shall be no less than 11" deep, measured from riser to riser. b) Be slip resistant. c) Have smooth, rounded or chamfered exposed edges. d) Have no abrupt edges at the nosing. e) Nosing shall not project ~1 ½" past the face of the riser above. f) Open risers are not permitted. • SANITARY FACILITIES 12. Note that the doorways leading to sanitary facilities shall be identified, per Section 1115B.5, as follows: a) An equilateral triangle¼" thick with edges 12" long and a vortex pointing upward at men's rest rooms. b) A circle ¼" thick, 12" in diameter at women's rest rooms. c) A 12" diameter circle with a triangle superimposed on the circle and within the 1211 • diameter at unisex rest rooms. d.) The required symbols shall be centered on the door-at a height of 60". e) Braille signage shall also be located on the wall adjacent to the latch outside of the doorways leading to the sanitary facilities, per Section 1117B.5.9. • SINGLE ACCOMMODATION FACILITIES 13. Show that the water c;,loset is located in a spaGe, per Section 1115B7 .2, which provides: · a) A minimum side clearance of either: i) ~28" from a fixture; Carls:t,ad 02-361 2/20/02 • RESTROOM FIXTURES AND ACCESSORIES 14. Show, or note, on the plans that the accessible water closets meet the following requirements, California Plumbing Code: a) The seat is to be ~17" but :5:19" in height. b) The controls for flush valves shall be: i) Mounted on the side of the toilet area. ii) . Be :5:44" above the floor. 15. Show that accessible lavatories comply with the following, per Sections 1115B.9.1 and California Plumbing Cooe: a) Hot water pipes and drain lines are insulated. • COUNTERS AND TABLES(IF APPLICABLE) 16. Where fixed or built-in tables, counters or seats are provided for the public, and in general employee areas, 5% (but never less than one) must be accessible. Section 1122B.1. 17. The tops of tables and counters shall be 28" to 34" from the floor. Where a single counter contains more than one transaction station, such as a bank counter with multiple teller window or a retail sales counter with multiple cash register stations, at least 5% (but never less than one of each type of station) shall be located at a section of counter that is at least 3ff' long and no more than 28" to 34" high. Section 1122B.4. END OF DOCUMENT Carlsbad 02-361 2/20/02 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 02-361 PREPARED BY: David Yao DATE: 2/20/02 BUILDING AD~RES$: 1932 Kellogg Ave. BUILDING OCCUPANCY: B/M/S-1 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V-N BUILDING AREA Valuation Reg. VALUE PORTION ( Sq. Ft.) Multiplier Mod. T.I. 7525 per citv , , Air Conditioning . Fire Sprinklers . TOTAL VALUE Jurisdiction Code cb By Ordinance Bldg. Permit Fee by Ordinance I ,.. I Pian Check Fee by Ordinance j ... j Type of Review: 0 Complete Review D Structural Only D Repetitive Fee [E Repeats Comments: D Other D Hourly · I Hour * Esgil Plan Review Fee ($) 129,821 129,821 $638.961 $415.321 $357.821 Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue.doc f3t4:I ARCHITECTURAL TECHNICAL EXPRESS 1521 Sunrise Drive, Vista, California 92084 TRANSMITTAL TO: Carlsbad Building Department 1635 Faraday Ave. Carlsbad, CA 92008 ATTENTION: Plan Checking Department FROM: DATE: CC: PROJECT: SUBJECT: David Dixon March 19, 2002. Garth Packard LIFE M~DICAL T.I. P.LAN CHECK 02-361 RESUBMITTAL T_E;L: (760) 732-3648 FAX: (760) 732-3648 CELL: (760) 458-8278 E-MAIL: 2atex@cox.net PROJ. NO.: 0201 NO. OF PAGES: ___ 4_+_3_s_et_s_o_f _dr_a_w_in_..g __ s,.__e_tc.,... ___ (lncluding this cover sheet) Attached is our response to the EsGil review comments and 3 sets of revised drawings, revised structural calculations and unaltered Title 24 calculations. It is my understanding your office will coordinate distribution of the attached to EsGil. If there are any questions or comments please feel free to contact me. A'tex -~ ARCHITECtURAL TECHNICAL EXPRESS 1521 Sunrise Drive, Vista, California 92084 Phone: (760) 732-3648 DATE: TO:. ATTENTION: PLAN CHECK NO.: ADDRESS: PROJECT: CC: PLAN CHECK March 19, 2002 EsGil Corporation David Yao 02-361 1931 Kellogg Ave. Life Medical T.I. Garth Packard The following are in response to your review comments and the item numbers correspond with your review comments numbers. A. PLAN CHECK BY DAVID YAO 1. DONE ---All drawings and the first sheet of the calculations have been stamped and signed in the upper right comer. 2. NOT APPLICABLE---No.special inspections are required . . 3. NOT APPLICABLE---No special inspections are required .. 4. NOT APPLICABLE ---, This is a tenant improvement and all work is being accomplished inside an existing building envelope. 5. NOT APPLICABLE---This is a tenant improvement and all work is being accomplished inside an ·existing building envelope. · 6. DONE ---See drawing T2 notes 2 and 8. 7. REQUEST ---Request modifying this requirement to allow marking an exit walkway, in area which is already a pedestrian circulation a.rea, as shown on drawing A4 keyed note 19. The warehouse and storage areas are for storage of office supplies only. 8. REQUEST---Same as above item 7. 9. REQUEST---Sa:me as above item 7. 10. DONE---Revised drawing Al note 4. 11: DONE---Stairs rise and run shown oh drawings A9 and AIO .. 12. DONE---Revised stair details on drawings A4, A5, A9 and AIO. 13. ALREADY SHOWN ---See drawing El keyed note 9 and drawing E2 keyed notes 6, 7 and 8. 14. DONE-~-See drawing E4 notes 2 and 3 . . 15. ALREADY SHOWN ---See drawing E4 note I. Hi. ALREADY SHOWN ---See drawingT2 note 10 and drawing A6 keyed notes 6 and 7. 17. DONE ---See drawing Al note 17. 18. · DONE ---See drawing M5 keyed note 6; 19. DONE ---See section D -ACCESS REQUIREMENTS. 20. REQUEST ---Request waiving this requirement since the soil bearing capacity and appurtenant information is the same as the adjacent suite in the same building. Your office previously approved the soils report and appurtenant information for the adjacent suite and conditions are the same. 21. Same as above item 20. 22. Same as above item 20. 23. Same as above item 20. 24. Same as above item 20. 25. DONE---See drawing S3 note 30. 26. DONE ---See drawing S3 note 26. 21. DONE ---See drawing AS keyed_qote 19, drawing S5 keyed note 2, drawings S6 keyed notes 7 and 13 and drawing S7 keyed note 10. 28. ALREADY SHOWN ---See drawing SI keyed note 14. See drawing S6 detail 4 and drawing S7 detail 2. 29. DONE ---See drawing S3 note 27. 30. DONE---See drawing S3 note 28. 31. DONE ---See drawing S3 note 29. . 32. REQUEST ---Request this requirement be waived since: (1) the designed shear walls exceed the maximum allowable load by between 160% and 860%, and (2) the required shear wall values have been increased by 50% above recently approved structural calculations for the adjacent suit in the same building. 33. DONE ---See drawing A8 keyed note 19 and drawing S7 keyed note 10. 34. REQUEST---Request waiving this requirement since: (l}the submitted structural calculations cover essentially the same and additional items as those structural calculations recently provided for the.adjacent suite in the same building, (2}:yo\rr office recently approved the structural calculations for th(l adjacent suite, (3) the required shear wall values have been increased by 50% from the previously approved-structural calculations, and (4) the designed shear walls exceed the maximum allowable load by between 160% and 860%. 35. NOT APPLICABLE ---The lateral force from-the roof is being transferred into the existing perimeter walls. The existing tenant improvement doi;,s not have interior shear walls. 36. Same as above item 34. 3 7. PLANS MATCH ---Foundations for drawings A3; S 1 and S2 match. 38. ALREADY DONE---See drawing AI0 .. 39. DONE---See drawing S7 details 3 and 4. 40. DONE.---See drawing A4 keyed note 18, drawing A 7 keyed note 11 and drawing S8 detail 2. 41. DONE ---See Sections B and C. · 42. DONE ---See annotated responses in Sections A, B, C and D. 43. DONE---(1) Moved drawing T2 notes 13, 16 and 17 to drawing M4 notes 17, 18 and 19. (2) Changed length of Hilti anchor from 7" to 6" to conform with the detail. See structural calculations page 5. 44. . NOT APPLICABLE ---No questions. B. PLUMBING, MECHANICAL AND ENERGY PLAN CHECK BY GLEN ADAMEK 1. DONE ---All drawings and the first sheet of the calculations have been stamped and signed in the upper right comer. 2. NOT APPLICABLE ---No.hazardous.materials are proposed to be stored or used in the facility. 3. DONE ---See drawing MS detail 2. 4. NOT APPLICABLE ---Water heater is existing and is to be reused. See drawing A3 keyed note 12, drawing MS keyed note 7 and drawing El keyed note 3. 5. OONE---·see drawing Al note 16. 6. ALREADY DONE ---See drawing MS keyed note 8. 7. NOT APPLICABLE ---Roof access ladder is existing. See drawing AS keyed note 5 and drawing M3 keyed note 7. 8. DONE ---See drawing M4 note 20'. 9. NOT APPLICABLE---Roof access ladder is existing. See drawing AS keyed note 5 and drawing M3 keyed note 7. 10. DONE ---See drawing M4 note 21. I la. ALREADY DONE---See PERF-1 page I. The preparer signed approximately 1/3 down on the page. I lb. NOT APPLICABLE---Windows are existing and new matches existing window. · 12. DONE ---Revised drawing E4 lighting notes 1 and 2. C. ELECTRICAL PLAN CHECK BY MORTEZA BEHESHTI I. DONE ---Added requirements to drawing E4 electrical note 5. 2. DONE ---Revised drawing E4 electrical note 2 tn include requirements. 3. ALREADY DONE--~ See drawing E4 electrical note.2; however the note has been revised to change the insulation from THHN to THWN and added the N.E.C. reference. 4. ALREADY DONE ---See drawing El key~d note 11. 5. NOT APPLICABLE ---This tenant improvement is not for a medical building. The tenant improvement is for an office building with storage for office supplies. 6. ALREADY DONE ---See drawing E4 electrical note 6; however, the note has been revised to confirm the GFI requirement and "wet locations" marking for the weather-tight cover. 7. ALREADY DONE ---See drawing E4 electrical note 1. 8. NOT APPLICABLE ---Occupancy load is only 34 . . 9. NOT APPJ.,ICABLE---Signage is p.qt_allowed on the building. 10. DONE ---See upper right comer of drawings. 11. NOT APPLICABLE ---Signage is not allowed on the building. 12. DONE ---See drawing E4 electrical note 9. D. ASSESSABILITY PLAN CHECK 1. DONE ---Replaced the curb ramp--.see drawing A3. Modified stair handrails extensions --see drawings A4, A5, A9 and A.10. 2. DONE ---See drawing Al note 18. ~-DONE---Replaced the curb ramp. See 91"awing A3. 4. ALREADY DONE ---The sidewalk is existing and complies with these requirements. 5. NOT APPLIGABLE ---There are no abrupt level changes along the accessible route of travel. 6. ALREADY DONE -~-The entry walkway is existing anq complies with these requirements. 7. NOT APPLICABLE---There is no elevator. 8. DONE---Added dimension to drawing A4 corridor door 14. 9. PONE ---Revised stair details on drawings A4; A5, A9 and Al 0. 10. DONE---See drawing Al note 19. 11. DONE ---See drawing Al note 20. 12. DONE ---See drawing Al note 21. 13. ALREADY DONE ---See drawing A6. 14. DONE ---See drawing Al notes 22 and 23. 15. DONE ---See qrawing Al note 24. 16. NOT APPLICABLE ---There are no fixed or built-in tables, counters or s·eats. 17. NOT APPLICABLE---There are no tables or counters. •· .. TENANT IMPROVEMENT 1932 Kellogg Ave. Carlsbad, CA 92008 STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS Floor Loads Ledger Bolts Lateral Analysis Loads · TABLE OF CONTENTS Horizontal Loads Footing Design Loads Footings Desfgn Stair Handrail Window Opening Post Design Window-Opening Analysis Floor Joists Design Bear Design 1 1 1 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 4-6 7 8-9 1eN/fNr I/Y}ff<Ot//3/J113N T 11 ~---i. Kdl~t Av-e. Ca,-/56a ~ , CA 'f,z..,OD e [7 Fl Oc>JZ. L.OA-~ L,l. (off/,e) = $'0 rsf ·7 I• CU...-, 117/g T.J1/1..6f:"'&.. It tta.c, '?/1" pk; t-<.rtrod -;: -- /17f pa1-Ff,'1"VJs ~ 5/ 8 ,. c1 ri (N?t,-t1 -- [zl L€DGE/'Z 8oc.,15 2,S-;nf- . 2, 'J Z, 3 -Z,7 /0, 0 fSf p-;.{l.L. I-D.c.,X5f~.)(/Jt>lf~~c,'J,,7) ~( 60 ,P5r)(7,75')(;,~3·): blo #- A11~c;t,/e. l&-ad' _1. 1-o tJra,'n f&r '3/1-11if oe>II ~ 870:tf > 6/b# j .: 6 ·1<-1 .', U5t3 '!?/4''t/> .H/f-Tl-0.VI~ Bat..15·@ lf.o" £/v1!d:~-i)_l}f;[l '/-1/-i..'' t N I PlAf-1 Yf 6 """ ;'·o 11 . I . ,----, ([) ® (i) Fl LOA;7$ /vif-u-lov p-a r f,'f i'.,-,,, 5 "21-o' >< 8 1 >< /O p9f :-11, -?_ft) 11:- Ff oor :. "l., 790 s-.f. x 1,S psf ~ 'l, o o/~ w ~ '2,_f I ?-.9 311-. '2./1 "2.93 # X 0, '2 7CJ 5, Cjf/ it W_.;; -= §. 91-1 % / A '2., ?Jo rf : -Z, "2... p.5f [fl f/Of<.IZ. l:oAD 70 lit--16@ w :'.' 'j 1,. I)< CJ 1 5 I >' 2 , '(_ f 5/ :: 5 9 ff> -/j;, £>U5T., 6''U9NC. v'l!At..L 1<-ec&,vr::-<; l-<>/-fp·n1rzv LcP6t?"l2-. SE€ O&-r. 0 fliJ!<.12: l-o/h') "/6 l.!NE (i) W -:: '°3"l..1 )< l>,7f"1> '2, -z. 17 ,{ ~ I, 1oq 1t- 5/1et1-r ;3evne! (%" 1;1';1£,.n.>oJ) :: 281..>1 3!!,o jlf Jo, 64-0 # > I, 101 'ft" I-~ o,~., [?] f!oiZ--12. t......o/-JD 70 1,,.1J-..1e@ w~ (3'2-'> 7,7...S':z-z.-z.psf) .,.-(S6,S 1>< 1'5",75':x 'l.."Zf'5f)-:: '2.,4/,"'J#- 5/,e,wpcvv--e.J C5/8''?('1wve;d): 41-.5 1 .;,-380171/: 16,9/0if..)'Z.,4(,1# !,'. O,,J<.1 [$]. fl0(4.i2, LoA-·'D ,D l 11'/f!@ I . I I ;-tf. \A -:. S6,S )(' 15, 75' X "l, 'Z. f S/--::. I, C/7& GXl5(. 6 It uONC. fN/ft,L /<f;C~/Vl;> l-<>fo'O THRO LE,!)(;€/<... 5et:= t?eT- [fl HOfZIZ, l.-0/J'J) 10_ L11v€ 0 W ,:.. 16 1 x 6 ; ' >< .z. "2.. f sf :: 2 , '?. I B #- ~Xt5 T. h ,, t..01vc., {/V,4{...L f<eC../2/Vc;, 60/11,? r~f<.l,t LEI,?{,,~ I '?eE Per. R J{Df2.1Z, l 0/1{) TO l l!-1/E ® W-:. (lt'><-6,7/ x"l,'2../s() -r (11. 'l..S'+. ~/,51 -r 1.,"2:..fY/) :;. ),067 .,it.. 5/4ear ft<,t,,e--f ('J/s{'pl'1w<roc1): ,z.;'.x '3$v r'f:; 7, ~80-II->'3,0671d / :: O,K, I UT] /-'fbf<..tZ, l-0/-rO 7o l IN~® W-=-/'l.,'2§1 :,,. ?;1,5 1 x Z."2.pl{-=-6tt:J#- 91e,I{,,.. fCl/1-•-el (3/g'' t"1~";):: :S1.5'1 .)r '3Soptf l/,C/76 -jt,_ ) g4-9 Ii ! .: 6,K., 2 of o/ .. [7'2J .Poo7;.N~ OP-51c..-1-1 Lo.A-05 5:>// /Je-art'v•tj ::-"2 1 Ooz;> j?~f /4r C,(77,, f, f..e,·i:>f,~95 pe,r 5°//s ,, ,, -a -z., -Z5o f.sf " 5pyee<d " ,, Ct:>11c.. -::--Z,at>o 175/ /dr frw1-//S'/f N·1 ,'.x [G] 0/\IT FooTING AT t..11---1E© W::: /'lo-or f-JN'i:<.// loa.:I"' (15,!1-5 1)(tQp5f) -I-(/6')(tof?5/): /,06& 17lf G = W/4 :: 1,06 8 f1 1'[,(_ -:. ~. 5'541 . I·', //>~ /"2-1, /AJtOE FfG., 5, 2.,0<'.>6 ff{ . I.-.--'-· --------+- Fl '5ff<.tdA C? FC5D71N0 /fT {A}l. \tV-:: /'3,5 1>< J:t,75 1 x 60 psf-:: /,Z, 75"~-# A: ~. -/'2-, ?~B ~ :: 5",, 67 >I 51,. -z., "2!70 p>f I· , I . I use '3-o" 5&, 1-:::rc;_ (07. STA1JZ f!ANO/?.All. ;: "=. '50 17! ! X /. ' 3 1 :: 61. 1 s "/:t f~ I / V>;'-= p-"-:. 6.6,5#-,.. 1-.17 '-c '2.,77/l·lb f"l.. :: IN/ _ '2-77 -4..tt/ : //0 # './..,_ -/7 /0, 'J-2..' ~I:? A f.. .,f .f:I/ v~. :. z.,i .L -:. o 6 /M,Ojs/ ; /, 1. 7 ,1, ,'i,, , '. U5E WA$f/E/Z. vv/T/-1 M 11-1, I. Z,7 5&. IN. 8G f/Z./r,IG RD WI f.JOOW OfE 1--/IN(;. '5M,Jlle as 5fn,,_c.f, d~>/9//) t,r5ed a,f IC/"3b k-e,1101')'· I 5'c'e f'Aa.€5 4 70 {,;:, I [DJ ;::705 T 0~ St 6 1--.J fl--= Ae,~t,f -= 7'.. o 11 ·p-:: /3.S'x IS-,75 1'>< 6P rs(: 12, 7S8 ll (y'f 4'1 X //' o/.f. n,o, I £::. I 660 cz>o f>/ ( I ,,,_ cJ,K, I 5 of 1 m Project: PAntELL ENGINEERING --GROUP, INC. Client: . _ _._ __ of __ 3_. __ · r I · i ·1 1 1 i ·, ; .-, • · 4 • • ' '! • • \ • ., • • \ I : ! l ·i . I ' j I , -: i :· ·1 ! l t l : i i . l t : : ; : . : : 'f;: <;I •• · 1 l ,: _l I.; Iii j C, .. I. · .: ·L. ... -·; ... ~JJ~A-i4~i-.~---.l.\ill.Jlrtt, .. fL~1i-~--hli .. doict~lQ.ek_N_116J_~s--~--.: • : , • I ·1 ; j : l ; -I l ' I I I : . I . . I 1 • : I . •. r , I . -· .. -. . . . 1 , ,. , , • , • • • • • :--·-t ··-i··. ·t'·-1·--r-i.,...,--.--.. -·--:-·-·1----:----,----.-----,·-l-··--1., __ J.. ___ ,; --:-· ... ~-+--. .L,_ .. ; __ ,._, '. -+-:-·-· ; ..... -'9 1 -- ..... :·-,_. .. · . i . ! . :! . : I . ; ' ;1...,, : -I I l i I l ·! I !-t I l J ! I : : ! : : ~ ( ,. I I · ; . t: ' 1 · ; 1 j ' ' I ' ' i ; ! l : ! I. : '· • . -.. ! -._ ... " ... ~--r-· :-... , -}-=-• ... , ...... -~_,,,,.,:._.....,.._, ..... ._......;J.. I -; ---+----L.... ' . , ___ ,: .... _.~._ __ :.., __ .,;_ ...... • • ~ ; ; i k I • I ~ . i. . I ' t . I I . ' ! ! .I i ' . ! . I . . r j -~ ~-, .W. e.P.e.~_W:1~.0Q)N_~-~, .. ~-e~~:,,L~t=..l~-E~---g,-~1ST..it-~~--~ .. ;_ .. -l. .... _; ____ j ___ _ . • • ' ..:~-t~ ' . . .· 1 :_ : • • ! I • . • ! . I : ; [!] . J I J l . -I i I I •.· r .o I NEW WINDOUJ5 . __ , ____ _ . ! ' ' .... ,. ,.. __ '. ' .. ' -.. • • -!-.... -. ' . i .f--.. ~ .. !·· ~-. j_• • i .. -·-.... , __ -· . .. . • -.: ·.r-;: : ;c~:"'j~ ~ :-;:~.~~(.MA~);~l--•· -;-:· ---. ..... -, .. · ... '. .. ,:,,_.,,_ .... _.. .. a. . . .. ·:· -··.~---~-\ 01::1,~sf.0: G" TtJ;.T. U.P .. P~_EL . t:. . o wo• , .. ..-JOo,o,• •' ";,•-•, f' •• • -:-•• _, ............... ______ ..... -··-...S.-·---~-'-,-. ~--- •' .. c. . . .... . . : . .· A ' . . ; ·-..... ·-....... -. --.. . . . .. .. . . . .. ' . • -t • : . -, . -....... !. -·· --·· ..... . . . . .. . . . . . . -. -· . : ! : . : ' : ' ; ; . ; . . .. ··----.. ~---+--·+-·-·,---;---: ·-· : -.. ; ... < ~ .------·--\ ___ '. ___ ~ --.... : .. _____ ,, ... -· -:--f I. C.-t PA~ELL E'NGl'NEERl'NG :::::=== GROUl;l, INC. 651 E. Northridge Ave. Glendora, CA 91741 PH: (818) 335-4362 .fAX: (818) 963-4812 Project: Client: Engineer: -"'-:!--:!.-.!..,~~~-.1.-.!,-J...i;,_~~"""""-----1 Date: ~~~H- TJ.Sizing"" 'V5.55 Serial t-tmber: 600000000 MASTsi2N' S1001"'1/28/02' ·s:S7:09"A!v1 #1'3 r1oot JoJSt .. 11.875n TJl®/l:,.65-JOIS-T·@J-18:0° o/c- Pogo1 of 2 · Build Code:145 · . THIS PRODUCT ·MEETS OR·EXCEEOS TH~ SET ·DESIGN-C-ONTROL$ FOR· THE APPLfCA'.flON·AND LOADS LISTED · rn1 -~-----,----·15·-r-------'----,-.-- Pl'Odlict Diagram is Conceptual.· LOApS:_ Analysls-for·Jolst·Member·$upportlng FLOOR---COM. -Applcatlon. · Loads(psf}:·50 Live-at-100%-duretion:· 10· Dead; ·20 ~on- SUPPORTS: 1 · Paraliam®'PSl; PPCB- 2 Parallam® ·PSL; PPCB· · INPUT BEARING. R-~TIONS(k} . WIO'TH · LENGTH · LIVEIOEAMOT.- 3.-50" Hanger· 519·/ 312 / 831 3.~ Hanger· 519 / 312 / 831 · Pl,¥'· OEFTH · DETAIL· OTHER-· 1 11.9" Detait-11 · 1 · 11,9" 0etan·11 · HANQERS: Simpson ~ Tie Connectors® MODEl· Lett.. Top:· ITI31'1JIS*· Right . Top ITT3'ff:S8"- REVERSE T.F, T.-F: SLOPE-SKEW" Fl.AN0.ES-OFFSET· SLOPE- Nd· NIA" No· 0 · No NIA" No O" -Nafjijl'lg: Left'(ITT3'11 ~,;. F,oe: 2-N10'; Tap: 4-'N1 o·; Member: 2'-N10' · -Naifing:Rigtt{ITT3'11.'88")'· Face: 2-"'N1Q-,·rop: 4-N1o·; Mitnber: 2=N10- DESIGN CONTRQbS: Sttear(lb) · Keaction(lb) Momeri(fl--lb) Live Dell.(in) Total Detl.(ln). MAXll'i/lUM .. 1000· 995" 3000 DESI®· COl"1T'ROL:· 1000 · 1925' ~--1~g(f 3000 ~10 0.172 0.375 0.275 0.750 CONTROL: Passed(52%) · Pissed(7~). Passad(48%) Passed(l.1999+) Paeised(L/653) • Alowable moment was increased for repetitive member usage. -Defleoticin Criteria: STAN~Rb{LL: U-480;' TL:L1240). LOCATION·· u: end Span 1 ·'l.lnd&r Safe toading Bearing 1 under Sit• kiadng MID Span.1 under Floor loading MID Sf,an 1 uncMtr Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading_ -Deflection analysis Is based on composite action with single layer iJf the appropriat• span-t:ated, GLUED & NAJLeo wood decking. --Bracing(Lu): Al compnmion edgot (t91>-and bottom) mu$l .bo bre.oed at 5' 1•. o/c \llless detailed otherwise. Proper •ttachment and posltloning_of lateral braclngJs required to achieve member s'tabllty. · · -Concentrated load requirement$ for standard non-residential 1loore haVe been considered. PROJECT·INFORMAl'ION-- n.-carisbad · OPERATOR-!NFORMA:J'ION~- . Trus Joist . . Jliy Love 300 Carlsbad Vilage Or. #218, Oa-d, CA 82008 760-720-1793 780-43+-3373 ~111tCf2000by IRIS Joist. a Weye~r8usi11$SS. TJ.Pio 111'and:r'J.Siiing111'a-e ~ ot 1rus Joist. r JI® and ParallamlPare Nglstertcltrad9n'lerkl'OfTIUS 'Joist·. Simpson-Strong. Tie-Connector.;91, 11-Riglitered ~-of 6!""50(t SlrOll!J, Tie ComJ)llfl'/,ro, 76f 9 ioo~ NVI"IIHJVW J.srnr smIJ. -£L££t£t09l XVd ££!TT NOW 60/86/TO 4_1:·~@"_ . Beam· TJ.S;zing™ v5.55 Selio1Nutrber.800000900 7·" x· 11:815° 2~0E-Parallam®·PSL:. MASTSlil<J · S11 ff' 1128/02. 10:07:51' AM .. Page-1 oM EIUlktCode:-145· THIS ·PRODUCT· MEETS-OR· EXCEEDS-THE SET-DEStGN-CONTROlS.·FOR THE APPllCATfON·AND LOADS-LISTED· ~----~. ----------'---~· ------.... ~rr'-------,---:-0 ProdUcfDiagram Is CC>nceptuaJ: ,LOADS: ~-for·Beam Member SUpportlng FLOOR·--COf,A: Appication; Tribtltary·Load Wielth: 151'r-1 Loads(psf):· 50-~lve -at 1 QO°i6· duration; 10 Dead; 20 ·Pal1itlon" SUPPORTS:· INPUT· · BEARING· · REACTIONS(lbtl;) · WIDlH" LENGTH-· LIVE/DEAOfTOT.· PLY· DEPTH-.. O~AIL, OTHER· 1 Colomn"· 3.0oN· 3.5... e3,713393/a700 · 1 11'.9"· oeta1t11--TJf®-klngPanel- 2" C01Umn 3.50" · 3;5" ·· 535713Jg3l8750 1... 11':9" ·· Detail 1r·· TJWrBl®klng Panel · DESIGN CONTRO!;S; M\XIMtJM" DE818N· · CONTROL· CONTR()l · Shear(lb)' · 8538., 7119" 1eo11· Passed(iW%) Moment(1t-lbf' 28837 28637 , 39805 -Piined(72%)' . Live Defl.(in) 0.315 -0:447--Pissed(U5H). Total Defl.(in) 0.!515 0.671 Passed(L/313) -Deflection 'Crlterta: STANDAltD(lL: l./300; Tl:L/240). · LOCATION·· u:-8n!1 Spin·, ·under Floor toadln_g · · MID'Span 1 ·unc1er floorloacirig Mlp-Span 1 under Floor loacirig MIO Span 1 Wldtr Floor loading -Bra~ng(lu):·AII compreCSlon 1!dgeS (t® al"ld bottom)' musn,e IX'a'cecf at· 101' 11'" ota unl&'ss "detalhm ·otherl.Nlse: Proper attactVnelt· anCI · · positlor,lng of lateral bracing ts requred to achieve member 'Stabilfty. • Concentrated io.d requirements for .tandafd non-residential 1IOOt'8 haw been considered. ADDITIONAL..NOTES:. , -IMPORTANT! l1'ie •"81Ysts pr~ i• 0\tpUt frOm softwlre develOi>ed by Trus JOlst.(T J): Al6\vable' prockJct 'ilalues shown are in accordance with current TJ materials ·anc1 code accept6d desion values. The specific' product application, Input aeslgn loads ·and stated ~mensi~ have been provided by others ________________ __,, have not been c:t,ecgd for confam)a~ with the dlttlls,1 drawings of the blitdlng, and have not been.reviewed by T J Engineering. -n-ns NW.YStS FOR TRUS JOIST PRODUCTS ONLY! PRODUCT SUBSTllUTION VOIDS THIS ANALYSIS. -Alowable stre!IS Design methodology. was used for Code NER analy.zing the T J Commerclal product l$ted above. PROJECT INFQRfflATION T.I. Carlsbad· · QPIMJQR INFORMATION; Trus-Joii,t · Jay·LO\i'e · 300 ~ Vllage Of, #216,, Carlsbad, CA ~2008. 780-720-1793 780-43+3373 Copyright Qi 2000 b'; Trus Joist, ·a W&yemaeuser BUstness: T J.Pro-ana T J.SIZlng"" ars ltldill'lllkS of Trus .Jol5t . · r .18 end Par8ftarri&ilre r,gtmre<l lredemlml otTrus Joist. $ 11 &OO@I NVI11WOVW ~sror SilH~ £l&&t&t09l XVd 9c:11 NOW 60/86/10 .A..1'-~ cant-eeam· ~"'""w~-TJ-Sizing"' Y5.55 Serielt-bnber.600000000 7" x·11.s75u 2.0E·-Parall-am®·PSL MASTSl2N"'S1111 ··1128102· ·10:08:30'AM'. Page ·1 of 1 · BllildCode:1-45 · THIS PRODUCT ·MEETS OR·-EXCEEOS THE· SET ·DESIGN .. C0NTROL:.8 F0R--THE· APPLICATfON· AND LOADS LISTED· Overel Dinwnsion • 16' .----~---------'-----"-''--, ~· J ~· ~x·&"·-----....,....a.--3•-e•:...-.-------- Prodlict Diagram is CcmceptUal. · LOADS: Analysis 'for Beam Member-Supporti"!:!· Flc:>OR --OOM. ·Applcatlon: · Triblery·Load-Wiclh: ·15' r Loads(ps1):"50·Live at-1000b·duration; 10 Oead;·20Partition-· ·SUP.PORTS: -INPUT· BEARING· REACTIQNS("9.) · WIDTH-· LENGTH-·· LIVE/DEAO/TOT: Pl:Y-DEP11t"· OETAll· OT-HEft· 1 · Coll,ln1n·· 3.50" , 3.5w 740e-J ~91 t 12097 · 2 • ColtiM 3~50".. • 3·,sN· 526713205" / s;17l ' 1 · 11.9"· Detall11 TJl®·Blocklhg"Panel·· 1"" 11:9"·· Oftail l1"" TJl®-'81«:king Panel. DESIGN CONTROLS: MAXIMUM·· DESION·· CONTROL:· CONTROl· ~OOA'flON·· _ sttear(lb) · a730·· 72a5· 1eon· Pas&ed(45%) · u.·end-SpanTUh<ler"Floor ldaaing·· Moment(ft.;Jb). · 26810" 28810· · 39805' Pass~(87%J · MID Span 1 under Floor ALTERNATE span loading Live-Defl;(in)" : 0;2;5-0;440· Paned(US37f MID-Span 1 under Fk:lor Al TERNATE'span loading Total Oetl.(in) Q.~ 0.659 Paned(L/341) MIO Span 1 under Floor ALTERNATE span loacing -~ Oeflectlon·ertterta:·STANOAM>(LL: IJ3e0,·TI:.:L/240): . -Br.tC!tiQ(Lu):· AJ compre$$10n-ec1gea ~top·anu ·1>0ttom)· rnuttb& tncea ·at· 11.6' 5" otc Ul'lleSs ·delaned·otherWlse: Proi,er attaehmenrana·· positioning of lateral bracing Is raqulrwd to achieve member stablllfy. -The load conditions coneidered In this doeign include Alternate member loading, -Concentrated load reqt,irements for standard ncxwesidentlat floors haw bNn considered. AODITIONAL.-NOT&§;- -IMPORTANlT"Tfie analysis presented is outl)lt from l90ftware developed by irus Joist (TJ): Allowable product values shown are iri accordance 'With current T J materiakt and code accepted design valu,s. The specific product application, i'1)1a Msign loads and stated dmenslons haYe been provided by ethers,_ _____________ _,, have nQt been checked for conformlnce v,11tMhe dnlgo ~ngs of the bliktlng,_ and have ~ been revlned by. TJ Ens;neering~ • THIS ANALYSIS FOR TRUS JOIST PRODUCTS ONLY! PRODUCT SUBS'lTMION-VOIDS THIS ANALYSIS. • Allowable Stress .Deslgn.m~. wa• .used .far Cad• NER. analyJiiig.thtl .:r J .Commcclal . .product. lstad .above. PROJECT INFORMATION T.f.-Carfsbad· · OPERATOR INFORfMTIQN: TN1t·Jolst· . Jay·Lt:>W' 300· Cirtsbad Vl'9ge Dr~ #216,·· ~d, ·OA·g2000· 780-720-1703 780-43+3373 ·cQpyrli,tt~ :20001:tfTrus Jolst;a WWjartlaellSef Bus!ness; T J.Pro'.'l'·anctr J.Slzlng""11ra ~ omus Joist: T ~ 811d Parlllemllf) are registwedln1demerks of.This Joist. too~ PLANNINC/ENCINEER.INC APPROVALS PERMIT NUMBER CB(} 2,o 3& / DATE }///lo .2-------'----- ADDRESs_· ___ -'-,/9~>-~~--,--'-.· ~'--------~-s ......... f_~---------'--- RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL ADDITION MINOR < < $-10,000.001 OT-HER PLAZA CAMINO REAL CARLSBAD COMPANY STORES VILLACE FAIRE COMPLETE OFFICE BUILDINC ---------'---------'------------- PLANNER DATE -------,-------- .. ENGINEER~_-_-___ ___,___ DATE ---,---~7_/_/(~~-()-l---__ oocstMlsforms/Plannlng En!;lineering Approvals· >, .Q O') 'II: O,! (.) Q) ..c: C) C: C: C: "' "' OJ' a: a: a: DOD DOD ODD ODD PLANNING DEPARTMENT BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST / / / -'----I---=--=-.;_--"--Address ___,__./1~f_0~'-"'--!t'_,12 I~ ku·s,_____d&-1--. -~ i./62=1 Type of Pr9:\ect & Use:_-E,,L::,,::,,,..:;_:_=::;__-rb,--,Net Project Density: DU/AC Zoning: ·,Vfi · _ General Plan: . Facilities Management Zone: ~ CFD {in/oµt} #_Date of participation: Remaining net dev acres: __ _ Circle One (For non-residential development: Type of land used created by this permit: _____ -,---~-----------,----) Legend: !2] Item Complete D Item Incomplete -Needs your action Environmental Review Required: YES NO TYPE ---- DATE OF COMPLETION:-~------ Compliance with conditions of approval? If n.ot, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: Discretionary Action Required: YES NO ·TYPE ---- APPROVAL/RESO. NO. DATE ----~------ PROJECT NO.-'---------- OTHER RELATED CASES:~------------------- Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: ----'-------~------------- Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance Project site located in Coastal Zone? YES __ NO CA Coastal Commission-Authority? YES__ NO If California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact them at -7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite 103, San [?iego CA 92108-4402; (619) 767-2370 Determine. status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt): Coastal Permit Determination Form already completed? YES If NO, complete Coastal Permit Determination Form now. Coastal Permit Determination Log #: Follow-Up Actions: NO 1) Stamp Building Plans as "Exempt" or "Coastal Permit Required" (at minimum Floor Plans). 2) Complete Coastal Permit Determination Log as needed. lnclusionary Housing Fee required: YES · NO (Effective date of lnclusionary Housing Ordinance -May 21, 1 993.) Data 1:ntry Completed? YES NO (A/P/Ds, Activity Maintenance, enter CB#, toolbar; Screens, Housing Fees, Construct Housing Y /N, Enter Fee, UPDATE!) H :\ADMI N\CO U NT.ER\BldgPlnchkRevChklst Rev 9/01 DOD DOD DOD ODD DOD ODD ODD DOD 'DD DOD Site Plan: 1. Provide a fully dimensional site plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right- of-way width, dimensional setbacks and existing topographical lines (including all side and rear yard slopes). 2. Provide legal description of property and assessor's parcel number. Policy 44 -Neighborhood Architectural Design Guidelines 1 . Applicability: YES ____ NO ___ _ 2. Project complies YES NO ___ _ Zoning: 1 . Setbacks: Front: Required Shown Interior Side: Required Shown Street Side: Required Shown Rear: Required Shown ·Top of slope: Required Shown 2. Accessory structure setbacks: Front: Required ------Shown ------Interior Side: Required ------Shown ------Street Side: Required ------Shown ------Rear: Required ------Shown ------Structure separation: Required ------Shown ---,------ 3. Lot Coverage: Required ___ __... __ Shown ------ 4. Height: Required ------Shown ------ 5. Parking: Spaces Required / ~ 1 r) ---'-----Shown __ (_5c.__ __ (breakdown by uses for commercial and industrial projects required) Residential Guest Spaces Required ______ Shown _____ _ Additional Comments ________________________ _ H:\ADMIN\COUNTER\BldgPlnchkRevChklst Rev 9/01 ,~ Carlsbad Fire Department 020361 1635 Faraday Ave. ,, Carlsbad, CA 92008 ]l Fire Prevention (760) 602-4660 Plan Review Requirements Category: Building Plan Reviewed by: A~ . Date of Report: _0_41_0_11_20_0_2 _______ _ Name: P & G Construction Address: P.O. Box 2518 City, State: Vista CA 92085 Plan Checker: Job #: 020361 ------- Job Name: Life Medical Bldg#: CB020361 ----------------------=-- Job Address: 1932 Kellogg Avenue. Ste. or Bldg. No. ~ Approved D Approved Subject to D Incomplete Review FD Job# The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and I or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes and standards. Please review carefully all comments attached as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. The item you have submitted for review has been approved subject to the attached conditions. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instruct(ons in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. Please resubmit to this office the necessary plans and / or specifications required to indicate compliance with applicable codes and standards. The item you have submitted for review is incomplete. At this time, this office cannot adequately conduct a review to determine compliance with the applicable codes and / or standards. Please review carefully all comments attached. Please resubmit the necessary plans and / or specifications to this office for review and approval. 1st 020361 2nd FD File# - 3rd Other Agency ID Carlsbad Fire Department 020361 ,1635 F--araday Ave .. Carlsbad, CA 92008 Fire Prevention Plan Review Requirements Category: Building Plan Reviewed by: 4:602-4660 Date of Report: _02_10_6_12_0_02 __________ _ Name: P & G Construction Address: P.O. Box 2518 City, State: Vista CA 92085 Plan Checker: Job #: 020351 -----'----- Job Name: Life Medical BI d g #: CB020361 ---,----------------=-- Job Address: 1932 Kellogg Avenue Ste. or Bldg. No. D Approved ~ Approved Subject to D Incomplete Review FD Job# The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information ~nd / or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes and standards. Please review carefully all comments attached as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. The item you have submitted for review has been approved subject to the attached conditions. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. Please resubmit to this office th~ necessary plans and / or specifications required to indicate compliance with applicable codes and standards. The item you have submitted for review is incomplete. At this time, this office cannot adequately conduct a review to determine compliance with the applicable codes and / or standards. Please review carefully all comments attached. Please resubmit the necessary plans and/ or specifications to this office for review and approval. 1st 020361 2nd FD File# 3rd Other Agency ID Carlsbad Fire Department 1635 F-~raday Ave; .. Carlsbad, CA 92008 Plan Review Date of Report: 0210612002 ----------- Name: P & G Construction Address: P.O. Box 2518 City, State: Vista CA 92085 Plan Checker: Job Name: Life Medical Job Address: 1932 Kellogg Avenue Reviewed by: 020361 020361 Fire Prevention (760) 602-4660 Ste. or Bldg. No. Carlsbad Fire Department shall require an assessment of the current sprinkler system, to include but not limited to the following; Type, Temperature Rating, Bulb color/Size, and Orifice size. Applicant is encouraged to provide this office with a set of plans for existing system and a copy of the last 5 Year Certificate. TENANT IMPROVEMENT 1932 Kellogg Ave. Carlsbad1 CA 92008 STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS Floor Loads Ledger Bolts Lateral Analysis Loads TABLE OF CONTENTS Horizontal Loads Footing Design Loads Footings Design Stair Handrail Window Openin,g Post Design Window Opening Analysis Floor Joists Design Bear Design 1 1 1 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 4...c.6 7 8-9 C(JoJ.oJ(; IJ TeN/fNr 1mrf<o//e/J1eN 1 If:/ ~-i. Kdla,7 Av-e.. Ca,-($ 6a ..1, CA-9~oo e L,l, 0.l-. (off,-,e.) :: :;'O tsf 7 I• II& I-JI /t.. 6$ (!. I~ If(), c. 3/f''_pk; ,:,,,;,-a-oc/ l11f pa1-f,'f,~5 ?/ ~ " d r 'I t,,,..nt.,-t/ [zl L€'D6€tz 80<..,T5 :: : -:: -- 2.s-17,f- '2, 5" Z,3 2,7. /0,.0 fSf p-;_ (I-:(., I-D, l. -X5fl~.)(pt>/I 1/)CtC1J,,7) -,,( bO /5~)( 7, 751)( /, ~7;) -:: 61<3 #- A11~ a6/e l&-·acl .L ft> ~ra/n {6-v '3/,t"tJ l>olf -;. 87o_# > 6/b#-/ .: 6 •1<., ,', U'5!:E 'B/4"¢ ./-fJLTl·G.1/l/,(.. Bot.7s"@ 14" t;fv1efE.i)f}c[) 1-1/-i.." 0 LOA;;)$ /nf py/ov-pa;, f/f i'tn1 5 = -Z 1-o' :x S '.x /o p9f -: Fl "2.ct) tt- Floor:. -Z, 790 r.f. x 7,5 ps{ .,. 1.., oo/-; W·:: '2-/,?-9 311- W -"Z/, ...Z.9'3 ;¢ X CJ, 'Z 7o/ -=-s; 11-1 it c.v -. w~ -= s. 9cr1.;:, / A--Z, 7JO ff :: -z, '2. p5f f5) f/Of<.!Z. l.oAD 70 llr-11£ @ W-= 31:-'>: &,51 >' 2. -z fYf = 59i ti:.- !i:X/57-6'' UPNC, WA.t..t. ~ec~1v((> ~A-{? T!-t~I/ LEP6(;?"/2... Sf:E; 0&-r. W )iof.l.12. l.ok;) To L.11ve (i) w-: 1''L1 >< 1s;1s-'>--z,'"lr~I., 1, 1oq1t 5/2MrjJt:vrie( {%"pl~v,Tl$ucl) :-,Z,&1.x 3~017/f /0,64-0# > l,10<7~ j,: O,fo::".1 Fl f!DiZ-12. Lo/-rD 70 _t,.1f-le@ lAf-;: ('3--z.'>.7,7.,§'1 x'Z,-Z.psf) + (S-6,5':. 1'5",75 1>< 'Z."l.!'sf)= -Z.,46e-; ft . 5/i~J'P~e..--t (?;/g''p/'1wv-¢d):: 4-1-.5'>-3.8optf: l6,9fo-tt.)'Z..,4-i,o/# /:. O,r<.1 [$] f/()f<,/2. ._ l.. o.,,:vD ,o L IN(f@. \A/-:. S-6,S 1 )(' 15, 75' IX --z., -z. f ,f ~ I, 95& # {;;Xl5t. 6 fl C/>NC. {N!ft.,L f<.ECGE!Vc'> t.0,4-'0 'TH~O Ll::,/;}(;~7<., '>t:!'l= /)t;T, m H0/2.IZ., L-0/J:'JJ°' ro I-IN/:: 0 IN -=-It;, 1 x b ~' x "'Z.. '2. f sf :. 2,?.. I B j/:- GXl5T 6 '1 ,:;,of.!-=., WA'-L /<£6E1ve:;.s 00/Jt? 1~1<-v Lt:Pc.,~, ~e-E Per, Do] UD/2-IZ, ·L o/}C> TO l. If..!~@ W ~ (lt 1><-6°7 1 x~/2 .. ;s{) -t (!1.."l-5'+-. ';;J,51-r 1.,7".fY/) ~ 5,067# 7/4e4r ?~j,,, ~1 (7/B If plo/{,A.TUOCI) :: -z/ X 2&0 r'f :; 7, r8o 'II--> 3,067 :f:/-/ :: O,K, I G] f'/0 f<.. I Z ," /_... 0/1'0 7 0-L IN~ ® . . W-:c 1i..,.-zJ:"'.}I ;1,s'x 2.--2p-lf ~ BttJfk 5/-ze,l{l"ftl/1-,-e/ (3/s''thf~~-1)-:_ g;,!{1.>r'3Sopt( .._ 1;,q7oif-) 84-CJfi /.: 6,K./ [nJ .Pot:>TJN~_ OG-5/C,,f.1 LoA-0.5 i,'I .,6e-~n'0e; ::--2, C)OZ) ,P>f ~r c,;o,.,, f, .fc-~f,~9s pv/' <§0 //$ ,, ,, -a -Z., -ZSo f sf ,, 5,orec,.d ,, 1, (J; f1 C,., ::' ,Z J CJ"CYC) ?5 / /d /"' f17vv1 ~/ f J,-n /x ~ u9N7 FqoTl~G AT L.. 11---1e © W =. /'!&or f 1/!ft"<.II load ~ ( 15, /'2-$ ')( {,o j75f) f-( 16')(10 j?5/) = /, 06& 17/f B = W/4 :: i, ot8 r''((, -: ~. 554' 1· .'. ll>€' 1--z.11 N1P<=-;=-re;, I S, z.oo~ /ff 1----. ---------+- EJ ·'!J;t:<.t.;;A C? F6D7!NO ,4-T C-tJl. W -t_ ./J,51>< /::7,7S' >< 60 p~f::: /'l, ?5"2;·# A :: ~ ,:. ;-z., 7 ~$:: = s-.. 1, 7 f/ 5'1.-Z., -Z.So psf [Is] STA-1/Z. liANOJ<..All. /;;:. 5"0 p//-x /. "3 3 1 -:: 6{,,§' #. \A;'= P./,:. 6.6,5#-,.. +,17 '..,_ "2.-77/-l·lb f'/,;. :. lN/ _ 277 /1--tt/ : (,60 #· -. '.,/..,_ -0, 'f-Z.' A f.. OA., ·!Y, -, / _ OTO _ I ..,7 · , YUj. -,.,,,p;_..1.· -660js,' -';... ''I""'· · ,'. V5E WA5/-I(;~ (AJ/T/--1 /,;l_lt...f,_I.ZZ562.IN. 8€'}/Z..l/.:IG N _WINOOW 0fEMIN6 f--, I .:::,IJl _-j " l l _, 1---, -.:; - St?/1''//le ers 5/ruct. c1~$t9//> t.,15ed a-:f 19'3.6 ke-11011-I ?e°(:f f"ACJ,6$ 4 ro {,;;, .1 I -1 t/ ff ~ ne 1pi-•f -= 7 -o ·p= /3,$1.X i.?i75 1x.6opsf': IZ,7§8 It' (y'f 4'1K //' of.f, 11--0, I E-=-I 66>0 006 1.>5/ I I I re.= 1,0)017-s/ s+'' · 1 L JIJd ::: 1/ ,, :: 24 .< 50/. cJ,k, ·-;;,5 ~11""4.-:: A~ " ( '?S ''){7, -zs-")(1, fJeop!>/J,, 1-5, 37J/f. > n, 7S8tJ.. I,', r:J,;c., -'9 1 ... ,. .,_ .... 5~" ' ---·. 'P J I l l I .1 j j 1.·. NEW WINDOUJS . ·····---. ! ' ' .... , ...... _ '. ; .. -..... -!-....... . ' . : .: ....... i i .. ,.,_ ••.. I_ .. , .... ... ( . . .. . . . .. · . --~-~---~.;:-:~~=--;-~ ~ ::-;;~:~(-;.A~~l-... -;-:· • -~-~ .. . . . ·:· .. ,_-__ ·1&· -~~5t1N<SI &;'' iit;.i. UP F¼~EL ~ .. . ... . .. .. ·.. . . ~ . ~ 1 . .... J ~----· ' " ,.. • ., ~ ., A '-' """ . . .·•. . r:. . .. .... ;.: .. : .. · ......... · ·:···· ·i-· · T ·· ·· . . . -. -·· ·~ : . . ..... : . . -·. -... : ....... \ :- ·' ·-:--·-.. ... : .... . ' •• • •• • • I • -'"'' • • ~ ____ .,.,.. .. _, __ ,, ... _ .-.,~....-... -,.--;---'---' . . . . i ; : : ; ; . ··-···----~-----+-~+-·-·:--:---~--: ----'.---'---'--·-··t----i --------. --... --~-----·-······-· -: ' PA~ELL E'NGl"NEERl'NG GROV}:l; l'NC. 651 E. Northridge Ave. · PH:. (81 ~) 335-4362 Glendora, CA 91741_ . .FAX: (818) 963-4812 Project: ·c11ent: Engineer: _i,....:~~~~~-L....l..;;..J..i.:R~E=..:L===--...._ __ __. Date: -.1-l-J~'..L..-~~-sheet 3 .... ~ ..... -: ! -£:,~ . . K-TJ.Sizing™ v5.55 Serilll/Unber: 600000000 MASTsi2111 s1oor··112B102· ·s::rr.09·AM PtJgo-1 af 2 · 84ikl Code~145 · #1"3-flOOr.JoJSt ·· 1·1·.875-'1· T Jl®/l:.85-JOIST ·@·18~0° o/c· THIS PRODUGT ·MEETS OR··£XCEEOS THE SET DESIGN-C-ONl'ROLG FOR··THE APPLICATION ANG LOADS LISTED· m1 I-· :00 ' ' -------15•-r---------- LOAp§: Analysis for·-Jolst· Membet"-·S,upportlng FLOOR--OOM. ·Appicatlon. · Loads(psf}:-50 Live:-at.100%-duretlon;· 10-Dead; ·20 Partition· · SUPPORTS·: 1 · Parallam®'PSl; PPCB· 2 · Para~m®-PSL; PPCB· · INPUT BEARING. R~TIONS(k}. · WIDlH · LENGTH · · LIVe,DEADITOT.-Pl¥'· 3.-50"' Hanger· 519-/ 312 / 8S1 1 · 3.~ Hanger· 519 / 312 / 831 · 1 · · HANSiERSj Simpson ~ 'Tie Connectors® R-EVERSE T,F~ T.F: DEPTH· DETAIL· OTHl:R· 11.9" Detail·l1 · 11.9.. 0eta11·11 · MODEt: SLOPE-SKEW--Ft.AN0ES-OFfSE'r · SLOPE- Lett" Top· · ITT31'L88*" Rlght . Top ITT3'11 :SS,.- Ncr ~A-· No· o· · No NIA" No O" -.Nailng: Left'(llT3"11 :88*);. Face: 2-N10· ; Top: 4-'N10' ; Member: 2-N10' · -Nailing: R1gti (ITT3~ 1.88"):. Fice: 2-""N10-; Top: 4-N1t't; Member: 2=N10·· DESIGN COt;ffROL§: Sttear(lb) · R""eaction(lb) Momert(ft-lb) Live Defl.(in) Total Defl.(ln). MAX!NUM.. D!SIGN' · CONTROt· CONTROL · 1000 1000 · 1925· -Pissed(5~) · 995·· 995· 1SQO' Pissed(7~J 3000 3000 · 8610 Passed(4e%) 0.172 0.375 Paned(L.1999+) 0.275 0.750 Pa,sed(L/653) -Akiwable moment was increased for repetitive member usage. -Defleotion Criteria: STAN~Rll(LL: u400;· n::U240). LOCATION'· u: end Span :runder Safe toadihQ Buririg 1 under ~• loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading MIO ~n 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading __ -Deflection analysis is based on composite action with 9ingle.Jayerofthe appropriatia span-rated, GLUED & NAILED wood decking. -Bnacing(Lu): Al cornpt'fftion odgos (top and bott<>m) fflUlft be breoed at 5' 7• olc U'llen detailed otherwise. Proper •ttachmtmt and posttfoning_of lateral braclngJs required to achieve member stabllty. _ · -Co~ed load requrements for ste~rct .non-resldentlal floors haVe been considered. PROJECT·INFORMAl'ION-· r:i; Carisbad · OPSRAJOR-JNFORMA!flONr TrusJolst· Jay Love 300 Carlsbad VilageCr. #.216, Carlsbad, CA 9200& 760-720-1793 761H34·~73 ~l:ilf C1"2000by1rus Joist.a~r 6'1si~. TJ.Pio111·an<1Tl.Siiing"'·are trademarks ot,rus Joist. r.JI® aoo Pa~are T11Qlstertd lf8d91'!1Srt<1 ·ort,us ·Joist·. ~mpson-Strong.. Tie-Connecto!S9fi, a·~ered lnldenillll<of S/fll)Son-S!rOflG, lie ComJ)lll1J;ro. ?.OOl7JJ NV1111iOVW .LSIQr sml.L -l ., . «:i~~~-. T J.Sizi. "" v5.55 Serie! Nutriler. 800QOOOOO MAST~ ·s111r· 112&'02' 10:07:SrAM" eean;· 7·" x· 11:875° 2~0E-Parallam®·PSL:. Page"! of-1 BulldCode~ 1-45 · . . THIS ·PRODUCT-MEETS-OR· EXCEEDS-THE SET· DESIGN·CONTROLS·FOR THE APPLICMfON·AND LOADS-LISTED· m~----______,~-~00 "'"o --------~_,13·r---·------ Producr01auram ts concepwa1: LOADS: AnaiyM for Beem Member SUpJ>ortlng FLOOR·--OOM: Appleation.-TribtltaryloadWidth: 151 7J' Loads(Jlsf):· SO·Llve ilt 1 ()0'6--dlntion; 10 Dead;. 20 ·Partition .. SOP PORTS:· INPUT · BEARING· · REACTIONS(lbs.) · - WIOTI-f·· LENGTH"· LIVE/DEAOITOT.· Pl::Y· OEPl'H-·OE'FAIL · OTHER·· 1 Colomn· 3.50"· 3.!5... !53!57/3393/87&1 · 1 11'.911 • Oetalt-11 .. TJl®BlocklngPanel- 2 · C01umn 3:50'' ... 3;5" · 5357 1 33g3J" 8750 1 -· n-:9" .. Detail tr· T Jl®"Blo*ng P«net · DESIGN CONTROLSi MAXIMVM· OESteN· · CONTROL.. CONTROL· Shear(lb} · 8538.. 1119·· ·1so11· Passed(44%) Mornent(1t-lbf' 28837 · 28637 · 39805 · Paned(72%)' · Live Ciff.(in) 0;315. !J:447"' Pissed(U51"1). Total Oefl.(in) 0.515 0:671 Pasud(L/313) -DefleGtlonCrltlil'fa: STANOARD(l:L: ~; Tl.;:L/2-40). · LOCATION·· u:-·end Span·1 ·un<1er FJoor toa<1111:1 · · MIO.Span funder floorloacing MID"Span 1 Wider Floor lo'alirig MIO $pen 1 l.l'lder Floor loading w Bnll31ng(lu):·'Alt ~on 1!dges (tQP and boltomrmusn,e 1x1rced a1·1or 11'~ 0/a un~s-uetalle'd 'dher\t11se: Proper atta.CMlert·ana · · positioning of lateral mcina is reqtjred to achiew member stab!Nty: -. Concentrat~ io.d requiroments·for etandllrd non-rffidentlal floors have been considered: ADDLTJONAI...NOTl:S: .. -iMPORTANT! Tl'ie analyfds present~ iii otiput fi"Om s01twtre de'tlelOi>ed by TrtJs Joist-(TJ); Alowable prodUct values shown are in accordance with a.rrent T.J materials ·arid .code accept6'chlesign values, Tne specific product application, Input design loads ·and stated clmensiont have been provided by others ---------------· have net been checked for conformance with the desls,'t drawings of tM building. and have not ~ nwlewed by T J Engineering. -THIS ANALYStS FOR TRUS JOIST PROOUCTS ONLY! PRODUCT SUBSTITVTION VOIDS 'THIS ANALYSIS. -Al<>wable $1refl Oeslgn. methodology. was used for Code NERanal)'ling the T J Commercial product lated above. PROJECT INFgRfM;TIOtf T.I. -Carlsbad: · OPf&BATQR INFQRMATIONi Trus-Joiet · Ja,y-Lffl- 300 Cirtsbad Vllage Of, #216, . Carlsbad, CA ~2008 - 780-720,-17Q3 760-43+3373 s 11 r.oo l~r NV'11IWJVJll is1or SilHi £L££t£t09l XVd 9£:11 NOW io/86/10 .. .. £:J-~--_ _ cant-seam-· T~no"" Y5.55 ~tanber: 600000000 . 7" X ·1·1.s15u 2.0E-Parallam®·PSL MASTs!ZN"S1111 ··1128/02· ·10:08:30AM. Pagc ·1 of 1 · Buik:l<:ode;1-45 · THIS PRODUCT ·MEETS 0R·-E~CEEDS THE· SE-T OESIGN·CONTROL8 F0R·THE· APPLleATION AND L0A&S LISTED· Ovffllll Dimenlion • 18' ,-------,--------,..---------, !_I----J-----.~. ~2'·6"'--------"13'6·------- LOADS: Ana~-for seam Meniber-Suppotti1'19.FLOOR --()OM. ·Applcatlon: · Tri~ry'Load·Wiclh: ·15' 7'-' Loads(psf): 50·Live at-100'6·m-ation; 10·De!ld; ·20 Partition-· SUPPORTS: INPllr· BEARING· REACTIONS("'9,) · WIO'ftt-· LENGTH··· LIVE/DEAD/TOT-: Pt.Y· DEPTI+·· PE'f'All,:· OTHER· 1 · Coll,mrr 3.50" 3.5N 74CJe14091112097· 1 · 11.9"· betal111 TJl®-Blocldng1>.inel .. 2. Coklnn 3:50".. 3:5".. 526713205'/8473.. 1--11:9"·· Detaii 11'" TJl®'Btbcklng Panel. DE§IGN CONTROLS: l',W(IMUM·· DESIOO·· CONTROL:· CONTROL· .LOCATI&· Shear(lb) a130· · 72a5· 1eo11.. Pacted(45%) · u:enc:rSpanTunaer ·AOOr 10aaing·· Moment(t.;ii,)' 26810.. .2&10--39a05· Passed(87%)' MID Span 11Ner Floor ALTERNATE span loading Live Defl.(in). 0~205-o:«o-Paned(US37f MIO"Span 1 under Fkicir Al:TERNATE'span loading Total Oeft.(in) 0.'464 0.659 Passed(l.1341) MID $pan 1 under Floor ALTERNATE 9Pan loadng ~ ~ectton·Crtterta:· STANOAM>(t.L: l.13e0, ·n.:L/240): . -B11lctno(LU):· Al ·()()fJ1)tessmn·eages ·(top-and ·bOttOmJ· mustt>e meed ·at· 116' 5" Ole uniess·deranecfotnerMse: Proi>er attaehment and·· PoSitioning of lateral bracing ls ntqlJintd to achieve rnembi!r stablfty. -The load conditione coneidered In this deeign include Alternate member loaclng, -ConcentratecUoad re(JiremeNS for standard non-resl~af floors haw been ~dared. ADDITIONAL-HPJ§f:- -IMPORTANIT.llie·analysis presented is out~ from software developed by Tnss Joist (TJ)~ Allowable product values shown are iri accordance with current T J materiale and code accepted design va""'9. The specific product application, i..-d6sign loads and stated dmenslons haw beWI provt~ by olh..-. ,_ _____________ __,, have not been checked for conformilnce With the design drawings of the bulldina,.and have not been tevtewed by.TJ Ens;neering~ -THIS ANALYSIS FOR TRUS JOIST PRODUCTS ONLY! PRODUCT SUBSTmmONVOIDS THIS ANALYSIS. -Allowable Stren.D.-slgn.mathodology. was .usad .fix Cade .NER. analymig.the.:r J.~l.product. lstad.abov•. PROJECT INFORMATtoN T.1, ·Carlsbad· · OPERATOR INFQBft1ATIOtj: True· Joist · Jay·Love· 300· Cilirtlibiid 'VIilage Or; #216, .. cartsbad, .CA.92008" 780-720-1793 78«>43+3373 . Copyng1t11, :ZOQO i,y-rrusJolst;a Weye111aeuserBus1ness; T J.PrO'IM·anar J.Slzlng"" are~ omus Joist: r .»SI snd.PMellllTI® ere registertd~ ofTols Joist. £l££t£t09L XVtl 9£!TT NOW. Z0/8Z/TO I I I I. I I 1· I I I I I I I I I I I I TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ....................................................... 1 SITE DESCRIPTION ................ ' ............. : ................... ; . ·1 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ......... _. ...................... : . . . . . . . . . . . 2 FIELD EXPLORATION ............ , ................. ·.................... 2 LABORA lORY TESTING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 .General . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Field Moisture and Density . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ; . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Laboratory Standard -Maximum Dry Density . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Expansion Index Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 She~r Testing ......................... · ...... : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Consolidation Tests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 EARTH MATERIALS . ·. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Fill Materials . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Artificial Fill .... · ........................ ·. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Rockfill· • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Bedrock ......... ·. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Bedrock. ; . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 GROUNDWATER .................................. ·. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 FAUL TING AND REGIONAL SEISMICITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Dynamic Settlements ................................... -. . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Other Hazards Considered . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 CONCLUSIONS . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 EXISTING FILLS . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Existing Slopes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 RECOMMENDATIONS-EARTHWORK CONSTRUCTION . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Scarification and Removals, (Parking, Non-Building Areas) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Over-Excavation .................. : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Fill Placement . , . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 O Earthwork Balance ...........• ·. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Subdr~in Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 O Slope Stability . . . . . ." • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ·. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 ·General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 O Slope Setbacks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Erosion Control . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 GeoSoils; In(!~ I I I I I I I I I I ,I I I. I I I I I I . Table of Contents (continued) RECOMMENDATIONS -POST EARTHWORK CONSTRUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Floor $_lab Design ........................ -. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Foundation Settlement .............. · ...... , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Settlement of Fill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . 13 Retaining Walls ....................... .' ...... · .... · ..................... · 14 General ............... , .................... _-......... . . . . . . . . . . 14 Restrained Walls .. : .... , .... _-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Cantilevered Walls ... · ....................... .-._. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Wall Backfill and Drainage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . 15 Pavements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . '. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ·. ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 POST GRADING CRITERIA ..... · ................................... · ..... 15 Graded Slope Maintenance and Planting ............... · .... ·. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 Additional Site Improvements ...................... · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 Additional Grading . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 Footing Trench Excav;ation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 Drainage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 Landscape Maintenance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 Trenching . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ._ . . . . . . . . . . 17 Utility Trench Backfill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 Corrosive Potential . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 Sulfate Testing ........................ , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 Stotmwater Runoff Control Plan . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 PLAN REVIEW .............................................. ·. . . . . . . . . 18 LIMITATIONS ........................................................ 18 GeoSoils, lne. I I ,, I I 1. I I I I :1 'I I I· I I I I I • Ge·otechnical • Geologic • Environmental 5741 Palmer Way • Carlsbad, California 92008 • (760) 438-3155 • FAX (760) 931-0915 SUMITOMO BANK OF CALIFORNIA 101 South San Pedro Street, Suite 500 Los Angeles, California 90012 Attention: Subject: Ms. Victoria Isa Update Geotechnical Evaluation Lots 39 and 40, Carlsbad Airport Cen_ter, Unit 2 Carlsbad, California INTRODUCTION June 20, 1995 W.O. 1852-SC In accordance with your request arid authoriz.ation (dated May 31, 1995), GeoSoils, Inc. has performed a preliminary geotechnical study concerning proposed development at the subject site. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the nature of earth materials underlying the site and to provide recommendations for site p·reparation, earthwork construction and foundation design/construction based on our findings. Selective testing, of existing artificial fill materials on the previously sheet-graded property was included in our evaluation. Based on discussions with a representative of St. George's Holdings, the project may consist of constructing a series of small office buildings with associated parking and traffic lanes. No basement, below grade parking or significant road· cuts are planned at this time: SITE DESCRIPTION Lot 39 of the Carlsbad Airport Center (CAC) is .roughly rectangular in shape. Lot 40 is irregular in shape. Both lots are located on the north side of Kellogg Avenue, east of the intersection of · Camino Vida Roble and Palomar Oaks Way, in the City of Carlsbad, California. Both lots have landscaped, irrigated 2: 1 (horizontal to vertical) gradient slopes on their perimeters. A fifteen (15±) foot high fill slope, descends from Lot 39 to Lot 40 (see Plate 1 ). Both lots are currently vacant; however, some utility laterals appear be constructed behind the curb within the right-of- way along Kellogg Avenue. A non-structural fill area, where large boulders/rock are buried, as w~II as the western-most runway for McClellan Palomar Airport are situated offfsite near the northern site boundary. A concrete-paved drainage swale is located along the northern boundary of the lots. I I I I I I I· I I I I I I I I. I I I ·I SUMITOMO BANK-OF CALIFORNIA W.O. 1852-SC JUNE 20, 1995 PAGE2 According to the "As-Built" plans prepared by Sodas Enginee_ring, Inc., (dated 2/25/87) both lots have been .sheet-graded to drain in a southwesterly direction. Lot 39 has an elevation difference of approximately-ten (10) feet acros~ the pad. Lot 40 has an elevation difference of approximately fourteen (14) feet across the pad. The plans show catch basins located at the top-of-slope near the southwest corner of the lots. Previous mass grading has resulted in the placement of up to eighty five (85±) feet of fill within Lot 40 during two phases of grading. Previous mas$ grading has resulted in the placement of up to fifty (50)± feet of fill within Lot 39. Rockfillwas also placed beneath both lots and appears to occur as a layer from roughly 6± to 25 feet in depth. Initial grading occurred under the observation and testing services of Moore & Taber between November, 1985 and November, 1986. The second phase of earthwork was performed between November, 1989 and March, 1990 under the observation and testing of San Diego Geotechnical Consultants (later named ICG, Inc.). PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Based on review of a conceptual site plan and discussions with the representative of St. George's Holdings it ts our understanding that the site development may consist of preparing the site for the construction of a series of relatively small office buildings (10,000± square feet) with associated access driveways, parking.concrete .flatwork, and landscaped areas. We anticipate that earthwork to generate building pads for this plan will utilize typical cut and fill grading techniques, "cutting" soil fill· materials from the northern portions and "filling" the southern portions of the lots. It should be noted that re-grading depths may_ be limited by buried rockfill. It is also out assumption that any regrading of existing slopes will result in constructed slope gradients of 2: 1 (horizontal to vertical) or flatter. FIELD EXPLORATION Previous exploration of subsurface conditions on the subject lots, consisting of five (5) backhoe trenches, was performed .in preparation of our 1991 report (GeoSoils, Inc., 1991). The purpose of our previous site exploration was for a geotechnical site evaluation of Carlsbad Airport·Center Unit 2 as a whole. Density testing performed in these test pits indicated that the fill materials tested generally met or exceeded the typical industry standard of 90 percent relative compaction; however, isolated zones in the upper four to five (4 to 5) feet were found to not be compacted to the industry standard (i.e, 90 percent minimum relative compaction). Test results indicate that these zones are rather limited in both vertical and areal extent, and appear to be characterized by a higher than typical moisture content. Limited zones or layers of this nature may be considered typical within compacted fills of this size. Logs of these excavations are included in Appendix I. For the current evaluation, subsurface site conditions were explored by excavating six (6) backhoe test pits. Field exploration was performed on May 31, 1995, by a GeoSoils, Inc. (GSI) project geole:>gist, who logged the test pits, as well as conducted sand cone density tests in the GeoSoils, Ine. 'I I I I I I I .1 I I I -1 ·1, I I I I I I SUMITOMO BANK OF CALIFORNIA W.O. 1-852-SC JUNE 20, 1995 PAGE3 excavations. Sand cone density test results are provided in Table I. Drive-tube samples were obtained of representative soil fill samples and returned to our office for laboratory testing. Drive- tube soil samples were collected in 2-3/.8 inch inside diameter (I.D.) brass rings. The sampler was driven by hand. Moisture and density test results are presented on the Test Pit Logs (Appendix I). Test pits ranged from four (4)± to seven (7)± feet in depth. Test pit locations from both of our field evaluations are presented on the enclosed Geotechnical Map, Plate 1. The base map adapted for this plate was at an original scale of 1 "=80', as prepared by Rick l;:ngineering Company. · LABO RA TORY TESTING General Laboratory tests for the current site evaluation were performed on representative samples of the onsite earth materials. in order to evaluate their physical characteristics and engineering properties. Test procedures used and subsequent results are presented below; Field Moisture and Density Field moisture content arid dry unit weight were determined for relatively "undisturbed" samples of earth materials obtained. The dry unit weight was <;letermined in pounds per cubic foot (pcf) and the field moisture content was determined as a percentage of the dry weight. Water contents were measured in general. accordance with ASTM D-2216. Results of this testing are summarized on the test pit logs in Appendix I. Laboratory Standard -Maximum Dry Density _ To determine the compaction character of representative samples of onsite soil, laboratory testing was performed in accordance with ASTM Test Method D-1557-91. Results of this testing, both from our previous and current studies, are summarized in the following table: E TP-30 @ 2' Yellowish gray silty fine SAND 113.5 17.0 H T-2 @ 4' Olive gray brown clayey SAND 115.0 17.0 GeoSoils, Ine. I I I I I I I I I I I ,. I I I I I I I SUMITOMO BANK OF CALIFORNIA W.O. 1852-SC Expansion Index Test JUNE 20, 1995 PAGE4 An expansion test was performed on a representative sample of site soil from Test Pit T-2 at 4 to 4.5 feet. The sample was tested in general accordance with Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code. The test result, an E.I. of 54, indicates the soil is medium in expansion potential when compared to the 0-200, USC clas~ification. Shear Testing Shear testing was performed on relatively undisturbed soil samples in a strain control-type direct shear machine. Testing was performed in general accordance with ASTM Test Method 0-3080- 90. ·Results of this testing is plotted on the enclosed Shear Test Diagram, Figure SH-1 (see Appendix II). Consolidation Tests . Four consolidation t_ests were performed on relatively undisturbed soil samples in general accordance with ASTM Test Method 0-2435-90. The consolidation test results are plotted on Plates· C-1 through C-4 presented in Appendix II. _ EARTH MATERIALS Earth materials underlying the site consist of artificial fill, rockfill and, bedrock materials of the Jurassic age Santiago Peak Volcanics and lertiary age Santiago Formation (Weber, 1982). As·. previously indicated, artificial fill and rockfill was placed between 1985 and 1990 were derived from cuts made within the Carlsbad Airport Center. Fill Materials Artificial Fill (map symbol af): Existing fill was encountered across most of the site as a cap or blanket over the rockfill previously placed. Fill observed generally consisted of olive brown clayey to silty sand, with occasional sandy clay zones. This observation was consistent with that of previously reported fill descriptions (ICG, 1993). Similar fill materials were placed beneath the fill cap as described by Moore and Taber (1987). The fill encountered was generally medium dense to dense and moist to very moist (see Appendix I). Localized loose to medium dense zones. were encountered, typically associated with very high moisture contents situated directly above the rockfill. Rockfill (map symbol Raf): Although previous geotechnical maps (by others) denoted rockfill only within Lot 40, this material was also encountered in excavations within the western portion of Lot 39 (see Plate 1 ). When encountered in our test pits, rockfill typically consisted of brown and gray angular volcanic/metavolcanic rock fragments with a sandy clayey matrix. Moisture contents observed were typically high,. with traces of free water. High water/moisture contents are not uncommon in rockfill(s), especially considering the matrix composition. GeoSoils, Ine. I I I I I ,. I I I I I I I I I I ' I I SUMITOMO BANK OF CALIFORNIA W.O. 1852-SC -Bedrock (map symbol Jsp) JUNE 20, 1995 PAGES Metavolcanic and volcanic bedrock of the Jurassic age Santiago Peak Volcanics is exposed in the cut slope at the northeast corner of Lot 39. This generally massive unit also underlies a three (3) foot fill cap on the eastern half of the same ·lot. This unit is commonly fractured, providing secondary permeability to the formation. Rockfill underlying the lots were generated from cuts within this hard rock unit. Bedrock (map symbol Tsa) Santiago Formation bedrock materials (Tertiary in age) observed in borings on adjacent lots to the south and west, generally consist of yellow brown to light gray, silty fine sandstone. Bedrock encountered was typically dry to damp and dense. While bedding orientations were not observed during this study, a southwestern regional dip was noted in the area during previous site work performed by this office (GeoSoils, Inc., 1991) and others {San Diego Geotechnical Consultants, 1988). GROUNDWATER A groundwater table was not encountered in any of our excavations; however, previous deep borings on adjacent lots encountered perched groundwater at the bedrock/fill contact. The observations made reflect site conditions at the time of this geotechnical .study and do not preclude changes in local groundwater conditions. in the future. Seepage zones encountered may _be due, in part, to rock disposal areas placed within deep canyons withoutsubdrainage. Other contributing factors may be relatively clean sand lifts (i.e., more permeable material) in the fill (encountered on adjacent lots), and the reported over watering of landscaped slopes (GSI, 1991 ). The potential effect of perched groundwater on the existing fill materials onsite is difficult to estimate. The unusually high moisture contents measured in samples encountered near the top of rockfill in our field studies may be related to either surface infiltration or subsurface migration from up gradient properties. FAULTING AND REGIONAL SEISMICITY No known active or potentially active faults are shown on published maps in the vicinity of the site (Jennings, 1992}. No evidence of faulting was ob~erved in any of the exploratory borings excavated. There are a number of faults in the Southern California area which are considered active and .would have an affect on the site in the form of ground shaking, should they be the source of an earthquake. These include but are not necessarily .limited to the San Andreas Fault, the San Jacinto Fault, the Elsinore Fault, and the Rose Canyon Fault Zone. It should be noted, that there is no published or unpublished consensus on the relative seismic activity of the Rose Canyon Fault Zone. Studies at one location in Rose Canyon have indicated GeoSqils, Ine. I I I ,I I I I I ' I I I I ,- 1 I I I I SUMITOMO BANK OF CALIFORNIA W.O. 1852-SC JUNE 20, 1995 PAGES Holocene activity along one strand of this fault zone (Lindvall, et. al., 1989). As a result of these studies, the state of California has classified portions of the fault (in the City of San Diego) as active. The possibility of ground acceleration, or seismic shaking, at the site may be considered as approximately similar to the Southern California region as a whole. The relationship of the site's location to major mapped faults within Southern California is-indicated on the Fault Map of Southern California (Figure 1 ). The peak horizontal ground accelerations were determined based on the attenuation relation developed by Sadigh (1989). The largest probable and credible peak horizontal ground accelerations anticipated at the site would be 0.23g and 0.38g, produced by magnitude 6 and 7 earthquakes, respectively, on the Rose Canyon Fault, approximately 6 miles west of the site (see Appendix Ill). The acceleration-attenuation relations of Sadigh (1989) have been incorporated into EQFAUL T (Blake, 1993). EQFAUL T is a computer program which produces deterministic values of horizontal accelerations from digitized California faults. The results of this computer file search and computations are enclosed_ in Appendix Ill. Dynamic Settlements Dynamic settlements due to seismic shaking were estimated to be on the order of 4½ inches. The results of that analysis indicate that differential settlements may be approximately 3 inches, which _would suggest that angular distortions of 1 in approximately 1/450 could occur. The project structural engin~er should consider this level of foundation system distortion in their structural analysis. It is important to keep in perspective that in the event of maximum probable or credible earthquakes occurring on any of the nearby major faults, intense ground shaking would occur in this general area. Potential damage to any settlement sensitive structures would likely be greatest from the vibrations and impelling force ca~sed by the inertia of the structures mass than that from induced dynamic settlements.. Considering the subsurface soil conditions and site seismicity, it is estimated that the site has a low risk associated with the potential for dynamic $ettlements to occur and adversely affect surface improvements developed on this site. Further discussion is -offered in the Settlement section of this report. Other Hazards _Considered The following list includes other potential seismic related hazards that have been evaluated with respect to the site. In our opinion, the potential for the following list of hazards to significantly affect the site is considered l9w. • -• • • Tsunami Surface fault rupture Ground lurching or shallow ground rupture Liquefaction GeoSoils, lne. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I '-- I I r I SITE LOCATiON ( + ): Latitude -33.1250' N Longitude -117.2880 W CARI.SAAD Ri="<;F"AR<:H ca,JTFR GeoSoils, Inc. W.O. 1852-SC '·- GeoSojls, lne. ------------------------------------.. ·-, 0 ,~ 'I" t SCALE (Miles) l i 100 FIGURE 1 I 'I I. ,I I I I I I I I I I I I. I 'I ·1 I , SUMITOMO BANK OF CALIFORNIA W.O. 1852-SC . CONCLUSIONS JUNE 20, 1995 PAGE7 Based on our field exploration, laboratory testing, engineering and geological analyses, it is our opinion that the proposed development appears feasible· from a geotechnical engineering and geologic standpoint subject to the recommendations presented herein. The recommendations should be incorporated into the final design, grading and construction phases of site development. The engineering ~hd geologic analyses performed and the recommendations _presented, have been completed using the information provided. In the event that the information concerning the proposed development is not correct, or any changes in site design as currently understood are made, the conclusions and recommendations contained in this report shall not be considered valid unless the changes are reviewed, and the recommendations presented herein are modified or approved in writing by this office. The primary geologic and geotechnical conditions which affect proposed site development are summarized below: • Differential fill thickness/settlement across the planned structure(s). • In-place densities of the existing fills and their ability to support additional loading without undergoing significant consolidation. • Fill cap thicknesses on the lots. • Rockfill thickness and areal extent. • Depth of removals of exi~ting fill. • The surficial stability of existing fill slope·s. • Engineering properties of onsite earth materials. • Stormwater runoff mitigation. • Control and mitigation measures for erosive materials. EXISTING FILLS As indicated in the Site Description section of this report, previous grading on the subject lots resulted in the placement of up to 85 feet of fill within Lot 40 and up to 50 feet of fill in Lot 39. The majority of the fill placed on Lot 40 consists of clayey silts, silty and sandy clays, and silty clayey sands placed during earthwork in 1886 under the observation and testing of Moore and Taber. These fills were placed as an "offsite" fill in a small canyon area which extended through the central portion of Lot 40 and the northwestern comer of Lot 30. Overlying these fill deposits is a rockfill mass placed under' the observation and testing of ICG, Inc. Based upon a review of the data in our files, this rockfill mass is on the order of approximately 20 feet in thickness and is overlain by the soil fill cap encountered during our site exploration. · GeoSoils, Inc. 'I I I I, :1 I I I I· I I I 'I- I I ,I :I I I SUMITOMO BANK OF CALIFORNIA W.O. 1'852-SC JUNE 20, 1995 PAGES Field testing provided by ICG, Inc. during earthwork construction indicated that the fill cap was consistently placed above 90% relative compaction {ICG, 1993). Based on our field observations, field testing and laborato~ analyses, the fill appears reasonably compact and moist. One of hte purposes of this study was to evaluate and delineate the limits of previously reported "soft fill" within Lot 40 (GS!, 1991). Field and laboratory testing of fill cap soils, as well as observations within the eleven {11) excavations within Lots 39 and 40 indicate that relative compaction varies between 86% and 97%, with the majority consistently within the 88% to 94% range. The lower density may be due to drying, water infiltration, drainage, erosion and plant growth. Generally speaking, soil fill materials directly above the rockfill are less than 90% relative compaction, with moisture contents between three and eight (3-8) percent above optimum. The lower density test results are likely due to higher than average moisture contents. As the upper two (2) feet of fill material will be important for support of traffic lanes, parking, shallow foundation and appurtenant improvements, removal and recompaction of the upper two (2) feet of all existing fill materials currently exposed at pad grade is recommended across both Lots 39 and 40. Considering the existing elevation differences across each lot, grading to create level building pads locally may consist of "cut~" in this range. Deeper depths of recommendecl removals (i.e., remedial grading), warranted by "soft" fill soils are noted on the enclosed Geotechnical Map (Plate 1 ). It may be prudent therefore, to plan for deeper "cuts" in · areas where remedial grading is recommended; however, care should be taken to not decrease the fill cap over rockfill to less than five (5) feet, unless special foundations are utilized. Recommendations for treatment of fills within the building foundation footprint are presented in the earthwork construction section of this report. Existing Slopes Lots 39 and 40 are bounded predominantly by fill slopes. The only cut slope is situated in the northeastern corner of Lqt 39. Existing slopes appear to have been constructed at approximate gradients of 2:1 (horizontal to vertical). The highest slope, on the order of thirty (30)± feet in height, is located in the northeastern corner of Lot 39. The highest fill slope, located below Lot 40; is roughly twenty two {22) ± feet in height. Since placement, these fill slopes have generally performed well and show no significant evidence of instability; however, some minor erosion has occurred in the west-facing fill slope below the southwest corner of Lot 39 (see Plate 1). It appears that animal burrows (i.e., gopher holes) had locally allowed for concentrated infiltration of surface runoff, generating small wash- outs. These should be repaired manually. Overall, if maintained in a moist (not saturated or dry) condition and provided an appropriate maintenance program . is followed, existing site slopes should continue to perform adequately in the future. GeoSoils, Ine. I ,, I I I I I I I I ,I .I SUMITOMO BANK OF CALIFORNIA W.O. 1852-SC RECOMMENDATIONS-EARTHWORK CONSTRUCTION Jl.JNE 20, 1995 PAGE9 All grading should conform to the guidelines presented in Appendix Chapter 33 of the Uniform Building Code, and the requirements ot"the County of San Diego and City of Carlsbad, except where specifically superseded in the text of this report. During earthwork construction all removals, keyways, backdrains, cut slopes, fill slopes and the general grading procedures should be observed and the fill selectively tested by a representative of this office. If unusual or unexpected conditions are exposed in the field, they should be reviewed by this office and if warranted, modified and/or additional recommendations will be offered. Specific guidelines and comments pertinent to the planned development are offered below. Scarification and Removals (Parking, Non-Building Areas) Prior to placing fili, all organic material should be removed from the site. Subsequently, the upper two (2)± feet should be removed to expose competent underlying fill materials. Previously excavated backhoe test pits will· also require complete removal and recompaction. A representative of GeoSoils, Inc. should observe these removals to verify the competence of . underlying materials exposed prior to any fill placement. Following removals, the exposed bottom should be scarified and moisture conditioned to a depth of twelve (12) inches and recompacted to 90 percent' relative compaction. In areas where overly moist fill soils are encountered, spreading and drying .and/or mixing may be warranted. .Overexcavation surfaces should be observed by a representative of GSI prior to scarification and recompaction. Over-Excavation (Building Areas) Prior to constructing building foundations, removal and recompaction of the fill underlying proposed building sites should be performed. As observed in our exploratory site work (1991 and 1995) the upper 0-2 feet of fill is weathered and loose to medium dense, therefore, at a minimum, the upper two (2)± feet of the existing fill soils should be reprocessed overall. The extent of the reprocessing. work should be one (1) foot below the lowest (elevation) foundation element (shallow foundations) or a minimum of three (3) feet from existing grade (whichever is greatest), if a shallow foundation is used. This overexcavation should extend down outside the ·building footprint at a 1 : 1 (horizontal to vertical) projection to the full depth of the removal. In the areas where deeper remedial grading is recommended (see Plate 1 ), removals should consist of at least the upper five (5) feet from existing. grades. This number would more than likely decrease by simply leveling the building pads across each lot. For example, if proposed finish grades in the northeastern corner of Lot 40 are two (2) foot below existing elevations, remedial work should consist of three (3) feet of reprocessing. Such grading may effectively mitigate the "soft" fill materials above the rockfill where observed. Subsequent to all removals, compaction testing should be performed on the exposed removal bottom. In-place relative densities of at least 90 percent must be reported on this material. If a minimum 90 percent relative compaction is not reported, an additional removal and or reprocessing should be performed. This removal bottom should be scarified, moisture conditioned as nee<;:led, an<;I compacted prior to placing fill. GeoSoils, lne. I :1 ·I: I I I I .I I :1 . I I I I I I .I ,, ·1 SUMITOMO BANK OF CALIFORNIA W.O. 1852-SC Fill Placement JUNE 20, 1995 PAGE10 Subsequent to completing removals and ground preparation, the excavated on-site and/or import soils may be placed in thin lifts (4 to 6± inches), cleaned, brought to at least optimum moisture content and compacted .to a minimum· relative compaction of 90 percent of the laboratory standard. · · If soil is to be imported to the site for use as compacted fill, a sample should be provided to GeoSoils, Inc. with sufficient time to be evaluated by this office prior to importing. This should be accomplished to determine if the proposed import material is compatible with the existing onsite soils and their intended use. Earthwork Balance The volume change of excavated materials upon COf'!lpaction as engineered fill is anticipated to vary with material type and location. However, the overall earthwork shrinkage and bulking may be approximated by using the following parameters: Existing Artificial Soil Fill Cap . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0% to 5% shrinkage Bedrock (if encountered) . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3% to 5% bulking l::xisting Rock Fills . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0% to 5% bulking It should be noted that the above factors are estimates only, based on preliminary data obtained. Final earthwork balance factors could vary. . Subdrain Systems . Based on the nature of the existing fills and existing contacts between artificial fill and bedrock, in addition to the possible location(s) of proposed site improvements, there exists a potential for water to be transmitted through the subsurface in irregular quantities. Although not anticipated, subdrain system(s) may be recommended based on field conditions observed during the grading stage of the project. Typical recommendations for the design/construction of subdrain systems are presented in Appendix IV. Subdrain systems should discharge into an existing drainage pattern or other ~ppropriate outlet. , Slope Stability General; It is assumed that existing slopes (previou$1Y ~pproved) were constructed in accordance with the minimum requirements of the County of San Diego, the City of Carlsbad, and the (then adopted) Uniform Building Code. Fill slopes are anticipated to perform adequately in the future with respect to gross stability, if the soil materials are maintained in a solid or semi-solid state. Loose surficial soils previously identified on site slope faces, probably resulting from overwatering oflandscaping (GSI, 1991), will reduce performance of surficial slope stability. No remediation measures are recommended for this condition at this time. A program of slope maintenance along with reduced watering of slopes would aid in surficial slope stability. GSI is recommending GeoSoils, Inc. I I I I I I I ,, I :I I I -1 I I I SUMITOMO BANK OF CALIFORNIA W.O. 1852-.SC JUNE 20, 1995 PAGE 11 that the surficial soils on the slope between 30 and 40 be reworked to 6 feet below ground during the remedial grading work. The importance of proper fill slope compaction (i.e., 90% per ASTM D-1557) to the face of a fill slope cannot be overemphasized._ In order to achieve proper· compaction of any proposed slopes, one or more of the four following methods should be employed by the contractor following implementation of typical slope constructio_n guidelines: 1) track walk the slopes at grade, 2) grid roll the slopes, 3) use a combination of sheep foot roller and track walking, or 4) overfill the slope 3 to 5 feet laterally and cut it back to grade. Periodic testing should be perfo.rmed to verify compaction to the face of the slope. If the tests do not meet the minimum recommendation of90 percent relative compaction, the contractor will be informed and additional compactive efforts recommended. Slope Setbacks All foundations should maintain a minimum seven (7) foot horizontal setback from the base of the footings (bearing elevation) to any descending slope face ( excluding the landscape surface). Slopes, pavements, mid-slope walls, utilities, etc., which do not take into consideration recommended slope setbacks are subject -to possible movements. Recommendations for alternative foundation system(s) (i.e., deepened) can be provided upon request, for foundation systems adjacent to, or at, the top of slopes, should architectural features extend into this recommended setback zone. Erosion .Control Fill slopes will be subject to surficial erosion. Onsite earth materials have a moderate to high erosion potential. Evaluation of cuts during grading will be necessary in order to identify any areas· of loose or non-cohesive materials. Should any significant zones be encountered during earthwork construction, remedial gradir:19 (e.g., stabilization fills) may be recommended; however, no remedial measures are anticipated at this time. RECOMMENDATIONS -POST EARTHWORK CONSTRUCTION For preliminary planning purposes the following recommendations are presented for.conventional shallow foundations and associated· site work. It is our understanding that structures will be erected utilizing a tilt-up and steel frame method of construction. Current planing indicates a modular or isolated plan which would imply relatively light column, wall and floor load. Column loaqs are not anticipated to exceed 20 kips while wall loads are not expected to exceed 2 kips per lineal foot. The preliminary recommendations presented below, have been prepared using these .anticipated loads and assuming the recommendations contained herein are considered during design and planning. Presented ·below are vertical bearing values that incorporate the total and differential settlement values provided. GeoSoils, Inc. I ·1 I I -1 I I :1 :I I I I :I .1 I I I SUMITOMO BANK OF CALIFORNIA W.O. 1852-SC ALLOWABLE BEARING -FILL CAP Isolated Column Continuous Perimeter 24 18 2,250 0.32 2,000 0.32 *May be increased to 250 if interior column footing and confined by slab. 225* 225 JUNE 20, 1995 PAGE12 2,000 2,000 Strip footings should have a minimum width of twenty four (24) inches. Spread footings should have a min/muni soil to concrete surface area offour square (4) feet. When combining passive pressure and friction for lateral resistance, the passive component should be reduced by one third. Bearing capacity may be increased by one third for short duration loading which includes the effects of wind or seismic forces. All continuous footings should be reinforced with a minimum of four No. 5 reinforcing bars (or equivalent), two placed near the top and two placed near the bottom of footings. A grade beam should be provided across all large entrances. The b~se of the grade beam should be at the same elevation as the bottom of the adjoining footings and the reinforcement should be continuous. Reinforcement for spread footings should be specifically designed by the project structural engineer. The foundation soils should be kept in a moist condition prior to placement of concrete. · An increase in bearing may be allowed at 200 psf for each foot of additional embedment (beyond the values indicated. above) provided the footings are embedded entirely into the fill cap soils and that the maximum bearing value does not exceed 2,500 psf. Floor Slab Design (Contentional Shallow Foundations) The following are presented as minimum design parameters for a slab-on-grade, if utilized. They are in no way intended to supersede design by the structural engineer. Design parameters do not account for concentrated loads (e.g., fork lifts, other machinery, etc.) and/or the use of freezers -or heating boxes. Floor loads are therefore as$umed to be distributed in a uniform load ·of 50 to 80 psf. Slabs in areas which will receive the above noted relatively light live loads should be a minimum of five (5) inches thick and be .reinforced with No. 3 reinforcing bar on eighteen (18) inches centers in two perpendicular directions. Reinforcing sho.uld be properly supported to ensure placement near the vertical midpoint of the slab. "Hooking" of the reinforcement is not considered an acceptable method of positioning the steel. The recommended compressive strength of concrete is 2,500 pounds per square inch (psi). GeoSoils, Inc. I I I I I- I I .I I I I -1 1· I I I I I I SUMITOMO BANK OF CALIFORNIA W.O. 1852-SC JUNE 20, 1995 PAGE13 The project structural engineer should consider the use of transverse and longitudinal control joints to help control slab cracking due to concrete shrinkage or expansion. Two of the best ways to control this movement are: 1) add a sufficient amount of reinforcing steel to increase the tensile strength of the slab; and 2) provide an adequate amount of control and/or expansion -joints of accommodate anticipated concrete shrinkage and expansion. In areas where moisture condensation is undesirable (e.g., areas to have moisture sensitive floor coverings), a minimum 10 mil plastic membrane should be place(:!. The membrane should be sandwiched between a two-inch minimum overlying and one-inch underlying sand layers. These .. areas should be separate from areas not similarly protected. This separation could be provided with a concrete cut-off wall extending at least eighteen (18) inches into the subgrade soil, below the sand layer. The project structural engineer should design the slabs in areas subject to high loads (machinery, forklifts; storage racks, etc.). If requested, we will aid the structural engineer in the design of the slab. Modulus of subgrade reaction (k-value) may be used in the design of the floor slab supporting heavy truck traffic, fork lifts, machine foundations and heavy storage areas. A k-value (modulus of subgrade reaction) of 100 pounds per square inch per inch (pci) would be prudent to utilize for preliminary sl~b design. An R-value test and/or plate ·1oad test may be used to verify the modulus of subgrade on near surface fill soils. The subgrade material should be compacted to a minimt,Jm ninety percent of the rnaximum laboratory dry density. Prior to placement of concrete, the subgrade soils should be well moistened to at least optimum moisture content to a depth of eighteen (18) inches and verified by our field representative. Foundation Settlement (Building Loads) Provided that the recommendations contained in this report are incorporat~d into the final design and construction phases of development, most (50 to 75 percent) of the anticipated foundation settlement due to new footing loads is expected to occur during construction. Settlement due to bµilding loads is not expected to exceed 1 /2 inch for footings given the assumed foundation loads and dimensions. Differential settlement between similar elements within 25 feet can be estimated to be on the order of 1/3 inch. Review of the foundation drawings and proposed loc1ding schedule will allow for a detailed evaluation of the footing loads and associated settlements. Settlement of Fill The existing fill is estimated to be between fifteen (15) and eighty five (85) feet thick within Lot 40, and between four (4) and thirty five (35) feet thick on Lot 39. Fill was placed in stages and reached maximum height on this lot around 1990 (ICG, 1993). Although the soil fill consists of primarily sand soil, the silty and clayey fraction of the fill will likely be subject to long term compression and subsequent settlement. Based on the overall sandy nature of the fill, settlements may be considered substantially '(on the order of 90 per cent) completed within a period of two (2) to five (5) years, since the fill reached its maximum height. However, the fill may continue to settle due, in part, to secondary compression, new building loads and continued landscape watering at the fill surface. Significant settlement of the rockfill is not anticipated. GeoSoils, In(?. I I I I I I I .1 I I I I I I I I I I I SUMITOMO BANK OF GALIFORNIA W.O. 1852-SC JUNE 20, 1995 PAGE14 GSI has estimated the long term fill settlement to induce a tqtal settlement for Lot 40 of on· the order of two (3½) inches and differential settlement of 1 ½ to 2 inches on a building pad which spans the maximum differential fill thickness estimated within Lot 40. This would suggest angular distortions of 1/1200 for a building dimension of160 feet for Lot 40 for Lot 3 long term fill settlement may induce a total settlement of on the order of 2 inches and differential settlement of 1 to 1 ½ inches on a building pad whish spans the maximum differential fill thickness estimated within Lot 39. This would suggest angular distortions of 1/640 for the longest building dimension of approximately 80 feet. Lot 39 may be development with building footprints located beyond the northwestern portion where this condition would influence building foundations. Based upon our review the controlling settlement will be from the dynamic effects of strong shaking on this site. To reduce these po!ential effects, alternative foundation layouts (i.e., site plans) may be employed for building footprints. In adc:Ution, alternative foundation types may be utilized (e.g., post-tension design, mat foundations, or strengthened shallow foundation and grade beam systems). Such alternate foundation design systems can be provided upon request and would best be evaluated when specific building plans are available. Retaining Walls General: The equivalent fluid pressure parameters provided assume that low expansive granular backfill is utilized behind the proposed walls. The low expansive granular backfill, should be provided behind the wall at a 1 :1 projection from the heal of the wall footing. Foundation systems for any proposed retaining walls should be designed in accordance with the recommendations presented in the Foundation Design section of this report. Building walls, below grade, should be water-proofed or damp-proofed, depending on the degree of moisture protection desired. The below recommendations ate preliminary and should be modified if onsite materials are not as anticipated. Wall footings are not anticipated to cross cut/fill transitions. If this condition is exposed during construction, additional recommendations and modifications to footings may be required. Restrained Walls: Any retaining walls that will be restrained prior to placing fill soil (backfill) or that have male or reentrant corners, should be designed for at-rest equivalent fluid pressures of 65 pcf, plus any applicable surcharge loading. For areas of male or reentrant corners, the restrained wall design should extend a minimum distance of twice the height of the wall laterally from the corner. Cantilevered Walls: The recommendations presented below are for cantilevered retaining walls up to ten (1 0) feet high. Active earth pressure may be used for retaining wall design, provided the top of the wall is not restrained from minor deflections. An empirical equivalent fluid pressure approach may be used to compute the horizontal pressure against the wall. Appropriate fluid unit weights are given below for specific slope gradients of the retained material. These do not include other superimposed loading conditions such as traffic, structures, seismic events or adverse geologic conditions. When wall configurations are known, the appropriate loading conditions from any .GeoSoils, Ine~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I. I I SUMITOMO BANK OF CALIFORNIA W.O. 1852-SC JUNE 20, 1995 PAGE15 superimposed loads can be provided, e.g., loading docks, adjacent footings, traffic and earthquake loading. .I r,;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;,;;;;;;;;;;;;;; Level 2 to 1 45 60 *The above EFP values are for onsite fill materials as observed in the upper 6 feet Wall Backfill and Drainage: . All retaining walls snould be provided with an adequate pipe and gravel backdrain system {minimum two outl~ts), to prevent buildup of hydrostatic pressures. In addition, gravel used in backdrain systems should be a minimum of thickness of 12 inches, utilizing 3/8 to 3/4 inch clean crushed rock wrapped in filter fabric. Where the void to be filled is confined, the use of panel drains is recommended, but should be reviewed .and approved by the project geotechnical engineer prior to implementation. The surface of the backfill should be sealed by pavement or the top 18 inches compacted with native soil. Proper surface drainage should also be provided. Heavy equipment should not be used withi.n a distance equal to the maximum height of earth material retained behind the Walls. GSI recommends that compaction efforts within the area behind the walls be accomplished with hand operated equipment. Pavements For planning purposes, and based upon an assumed R-Value of 30, the following preliminary pavement section for site parking areas is presented. A pavement section of nine (9) inches is anticipated (3 inches of asphalt over 6 inches of Class II base). Actual recommendations should be provided based on R-Value testing of representative materials collected at final pavement subgrade elevations. Preliminary Portland Cement Pavement Sections of 12 inches for truck traffic areas are expected. This would include 8 inches of PCC over 4 inches of base rock. POST GRADING CRITERIA Graded Slope Maintenance and Planting Water has been shown to w~aken the inherent strength of all earth materials. Slope stability is significantly reduced by overly wet conditions. Positive surface drainage away from graded slopes should be maintained and only the amount of irrigation necessary to sustain plant life should be provided for pla.nted slopes. Overwatering should be avoided. . . Graded slopes constructed within and utilizing onsite materials would be erosive. Eroded debris may be minimized and surficial slope stability enhanced by establishing and maintaining a suitable vegetation cover soon after construction. Compaction to the face of fill slopes would tend to minimize short term erosion until vegetation is established. GeoSoils, lne. I I I I I I ·I I I I I I I· I I I I I I SUMITOMO BANK OF CALIFORNIA W.O. 1852-SC JUNE 20, 1995 PAGE16 Plants selected for landscaping should be light weight, deep rooted types which require little water and are _capable of surviving the prevailing climate. Additional Site Improvements . Recommendations for exterior concrete flatwork design and construction can be provided upon request. If in the future, any additional improvements are planned for the site, recommendations concerning the· geological or geotechnical aspects of ,design and construction of said improvements could be provided upon request. Additional Grading. ihis office should be notified in advance of any additional fill placement, regrading of the site, or trench backfilling after rough grading has been completed. This includes any grading, utility trench and/or retaining wall backfills. Footing Trench Excavation All footing trench excavations should be observed by a representative of this office prior to placing .reinforcement. Footing trench spoil and any excess soils generated from utility trench excavations should be compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent if not removed from the site. · Drainage Positive site drainage should be maintained at all times. Drainage should not be allowed to flow uncontrolled down any descending slope. Water should be directed away from foundations and not allowed to pond and/or seep into the ground. Pad drainage should be directed toward the street or other approved area. Roof gutters and down spouts should be considered to ~ontrol roof drainage. Down spouts should outlet a minimum of five feet from the proposed structure or into a subsurface drainage system. Due to the nature of onsite soils, combined with the hardness arid permeability of the bedrock materials on site, local areas of seepage may develop due to irrigation or heavy rainfall. Minimizing irrigation will lessen this potential. If areas of seepage develop, recommendations for minimizing this effect could he provided upon request. Landscape Maintenance Only the amount of irrigi;ltion necessary to sustain plant life should be provided. Over watering the landscape areas could adversely affect proposed site improvements. We would recommend that any proposed open bottom planters adjacent to proposed structures be eliminated for a minimum distance of 10 feet. As an alternative, closed bottom type planters could be utilized. An outlet placed in the bottom of the planter, could be installed to direct drainage away from structures or any exterior concrete flatwork. From a geotechnical standpoint leaching is not recommended for establishing landscaping. If the surface soils are processed for the purpose of addition amendments they should be tecompacted to 90% compaction. The soil materials should be maintained in a solid to semi- solid state. GeoSoils, lne. I I I I I 1· I I ·1 I I I I I I I I I I SUMITOMO BANK OF CALIFORNIA W.O. 1852-SC JUNE 20, 1995 PAGE17 The slope areas should be planted with drought resistant vegetation. Consideration should be given to the type vegetation chosen and their potential effect upon surface improvements (e.g., some trees will ha_ve an affect on concr~te flatwork with their extensive root systems). Trenching Considering the nature of the onsite soils, it should be anticipated that caving or sloughing could be a factor in subsurface excavations and trenching. Shoring or excavating the trench walls at the angle of repose (typically 25 to 45 degrees) may be necessary and should be anticipated. All excavations should be observed by one of our representatives and conform to CAL-OSHA and local safety codes. Utility Trench Backfill 1. All interior utility trench backfill should be brought to near optimum moisture content and then compacted to obtain a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent of the laboratory standard. No jetting or flooding of trenches ·should be performed on this site. 2. Exterior trenches in structural areas, beneath hardscape features and in slopes, should be compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of the laboratory standard. Sand backfill, unless excavated from the trench, should not be used adjacent to perimeter footings or in trenches on slopes. Compaction testing and observation, along with probing, should be performed .to verify the desired results. 3. All trench excavations should minimally conform to CAL-OSHA and local safety codes. 4. Trench dimensions, bedding requirements and structural setbacks shoul~ adhere to UBC, local ordinances, standards of the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego or the controlling utility company/authority, whichever is more stringent. 5; Pjpe jacking is not recommended for this site. Corrosive Potential . Corrosivity testing of site soils was not performed for this study. Such testing can be performed preferably subsequent to fihal site grading, at the client's request. · Sulfate Testing Sulfate testing was completed due to relatively large gypsum crystals found occasionally in the fill soils onsite. While the crystals are found in the fill, it appears that their growth was more than likely completed within bedrock. Results indicates that the soil tested in T-2 at 6'and T-6 at 3'-have a soluble sulfate content(s) of 2210 ppm and 115 ppm, respectively. Based upon. these results and review of the existing soil types, Type II concrete may be used in construction on Lot 39. Type V concrete should be used in construction on Lot 40. GeoSoils, lne. I I I I I- I I I I I I I I I I I I I ·I Sl)MITOMO BANK OF CALIFORNIA W.O. 1852-SC Stormwater Runoff Control Plan JUNE 20, 1995 PAGE18 It has been our recent experience from similar projects within the City of Carlsbad, that a mechanism for removing 11non-stormwater runoff''. from parking areas from entering the stormdrain will need to be provided. Structures to limit (or eliminate.) non-stormwater runoff may include but not limited to elaborate oil and water separator facilities, constructed "wetlands" or grass-lined drainage swales. An infiltration-type mechanism is not recommended. Plans should be reviewed by this office to ascertain if the facility will effect the performance of the site improvements. PLAN REVIEW Specific grading and foundation plans were not available at this time. These plans should be submitted to this office for review and comment and further evaluation as they become available, to minimize any misunderstandings between the plans and recommendations presented herein. In addition, foundation excavations arid earthwork construction performed on the site should be observed and tested by this office. If conditions are found· to differ substantially from those stated, appropriate recommendations would be offered at that time. LIMITATIONS The materials encountered on the ·project site and utilized in our laboratory study are believed to be representative of the total area. However, variations from the anticipated conditions and actual field conditions should be expected. Test excavations are reflective of the soil and rock materials only at the specific location explored. Site conditions may vary due to seasonal changes or other factors. GeoSoils, Inc. assumes no responsibility or liability for work or testing performed by others. Since our study is based on the site materials observed, selective laboratory testing and engineering analyses, the conclusions and recommendations are professional opinions based upon those parameters. These opinions have been derived in accordance with the current standards of practice and no warranty is expressed or implied. Standards of practice are subject t~ change in time. Overall, the enclosed results represent our professional opinions and evaluations which were performed within the constraints of a budget. Environmental matters related to the· documented upgradient landfill located at McClellan Palomar Airport is beyond the scope of this report. Offsite migration of contaminants has been noted on other lots within Unit 2; however, it is our understanding that monitoring wells in relatively close proximity to the subject site(s) have been abandoned. Additional information may be obtained upon request. GeoSi,ils, Inc. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , . . 1· I .I I SUMITOMO BANK OF CALIFORNIA W.O. 1852-SC JUNE 20, 1995 PAGE19 If you should have any questions regarding this report, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Respectfully submitted, EPUPLM/ATG/mb Enclosures: Reference List Appendix I, 1995 and 1991 Test Pit Logs Appen_dix n, Laboratory testing Appendix Ill, EQFAULT Appendix IV, Grading Guidelines Plate 1, Geotechnical Map xc: (4) Addressee GeoSoils, Ine. Paul McClay, CEG 1117 Principal Geologist I I I I I· . 1 I ·1 I I I I I I ' I I I 1. REFERENCES Blake, Thomas "F., 1989, EQ'FAUL T Computer Program for the Deterministic Prediction of Horizontal Accelerations from Digitized California FauJts. Geotechnical Site Evaluation, Carlsbad .Airport Center, Unit II, Carlsbad, California, by GeoSoils, Inc., dated March 21, 1991, W.O. 1260-SD; · Geotechnical Report of Rough Grading, Airport Business Center, Unit 2, Carlsbad, California, dated April 21, 1993, by ICG Incorporated . Jennings, Charles W., 1982, Preliminary Fault Activity Map of California; Calif. Div. of Mines ·and Geology, Geologic Data Map series No. 1, to 750,000 scale. Lindvall, S., Rockwell, T. and Lindvall, E., 1989, The Seismic Hazard of San Diego Revised: New Evidence for Magnitude 6+ Holocene Earthquakes on the Rose Canyon Fault Zone, in Roquemore et. al. eds., Proceedings from a Workshop on The Seismic Risk in the San Diego Region: Special Focus on the Rose Canyon Fault System, 106 pp. Moore and Taber, (February 25, 1987), "Report of Geotechnical Services, Carlsbad Tract No. 81-46, Airport Business Center, Unit No. 1, City of Carlsbad, California," Job No. 285-256. Sadigh, K., Chang, C.-Y.,Makdisi, F., and Egan, J. (1989), "Attenuation Relationships for Horizontal Peak Ground Acceleration and Response Spectral Acceleration for Rock Sites (abstract)," Seismological Research Letters, vol. 60, p.19, San Diego Geotechnical Consultants, lnc.(July 29, 1988), "Supplemental Geotechnicaf Investigation, Carlsbad Airport Center, Unit 7, and Off-Site Fill Area, Carlsbad, California," Job No. 05-4879-011-00-00 .. S~n Diego Geotechnical Consultants, .lnc.(August 7, 1989), "Additional Geotechnical Investigation, Carlsbad Airport Center, Unit 2, Carlsbad, California," Job No. 05-4879-016-00-00. San Diego Geotechnical Consultants, lnc.(August 9, 1989), "Addendum to Geotechnical Investigation, Airport Business Center, Unit 2, Carlsbad, California," Job No. 05-4879-016-'00-00. Supplemental Geotechnical Investigation Carlsbad Airport Center, Unit 2, and Off-Site Fill Area Carlsbad, California, Job No. 05-4879-011-00-00, dated July 29, 1988, by San Diego Geotechnical Consultants, Inc. Weber, Harold F., 1992, Geologic Map of the Central-North Coastal Area of San Diego Cou~ty, California, Showing Recent Slope Failures & ~re-Development Landslides. GeoSoils, lne. I. I I I I I · 1· I I- I I- I I ' ' I I I ,,· APPENDIX I 1995 AND 1.991 TEST PIT LOGS ·-' ·-·-, .. 1111 -· -... -... -~ ·--,_. ,_ ---· GEOSOILS, INC. JUNE 20, 1.995 TEST DEPTH PIT# (Ft.) Lot 39 . 0-6½ T-1 @6½ SAMPLE GROUP DEPTH SYMBOL .(Ft.) SM 2 ML 4 6 .Ge W. ·O. 1852-SC SUMITOMO BANK LOG OF TEST PITS ' DRY· PERCENT DENSITY MOISTURE (PCF) .DESCRIPTION 18.9 99.5 · ARTIFICIAL FILL (af): Gray and brown with common orange mottling, silty SAND (SM) with common bedrock fragments, loose and dry with occasional rootlets to 8"±, moist and medium dense to 6'±. 22.5 99.2 @5' ± Medium olive gray brown, clayey sandy SILT (ML), 23.1 99.4 · very moist, spongy, slightly sticky. ROCKFILL (Raf): Orange brown and gray, $andy clayey ROCKFILL (GC) with fragments up to 1 '± in one · dimension, difficult excavating, moist to very moist. Practical refusal at 6½ ± feet No groundwater encountered . No sloughing Backfilled ,_, --· ·-·-_, _, ,_ -.. -.. /_, --,,-· ... -- GEOSOILS, INC. JUNE 20, 1995 TEST DEPTH PIT# (Ft.) Lot 40 · 0-1± T-2·, 1±-1½± . 1½±-6½± @6½± SAMPLE GROUP DEPTH SYMBOL (Ft.) SM SM SM 4 6 GC W. 0. 1852-SC SUMITOMO BANK LOG OF TEST PITS DRY PERCENT DENSITY MOISTURE (PCF) DESCRIPTION ARTIFICIAL FILL (af): Light brown, silty fine SAND (SM), loose, common rootlets, dry to slightly moist. Medium brown~tan with light gray and orange mottling (i.e., rock fragments), silty SAND (SM), loose to medium dense, moist. 19.8 102.0 Predominantly dark gray -multi-colored, silty SAND (SM) 21.4 97.2 with abundant dark gray siltstone/sandstone rock fragments, medium dense, gypsum fragments, moist. ROCK FILL (Raf): Orange brown and gray, sandy clayey ROCKFILL (GC) with fragments up to 1 '± in one dimension, difficult excavating, moist to very moist. Practical refusal at 6½ feet No groundwater No sloug·hing Backfilled --~~~--~---~~~----- GEOSOILS, INC. JUNE 20, 1995 TEST DEPTH PIT# (Ft) Lot 40 0-1± T-3 1-2½ 2½-6 @6'± SAMPLE GROUP DEPTH SYMBOL ·(Ft.) SM SM SM 3.0 5.0 GC W. 0. 1852-SC SUMITOMO BANK LOG OF TEST PITS DRY PERCENT DENSITY MOISTURE (PCF) DESCRIPTION ARTIFICIAL FILL (af): Light brown, silty fine SAND (SM), loose, common rootlets, dry to slightly moist. Light grayish brown, silty SAND (SM), medium dense, moist. 21.2 104.2 Dark gray, clayey silty SAND (SM) with common 21.8 sandstone rock fragments, medium dense, moist. ROCKFILL (Raf}: Orange brown, clayey sandy ROCKFILL (GC), difficult excavation, moist to very moist. Practical refusal at 6' ± No groundwater encountered No sloughing Backfilled --;-f.-\ --· -------i ·-·--·-.... -- GEOSOILS, INC. JUNE 20, 1995 TEST DEPTH PIT# (Ft.) Lot 40 0,.1 T-4 1-2 2-3 3-6 @6 . ' SAMPLE GROUP DEPTH SYMBOL (Ft.) SM SM . SM SM 3.0 5.5 GC W. 0. 1852-SC SUMITOMO BANK LOG OF TEST PITS DRY PERCENT DENSITY MOISTURE (PCF) DESCRIPTION ARTIFICIAL FILL {af): Light brown, silty fine SAND (SM), loose, common rootlets, dry to slightly moist. Yellow brown, silty SAND_ (SM}, loose to medium dense, moist. .. Dark gray and medium brown, silty fine SAND (SM) with common siltstone and sandstone fragments medium dense, moist. 17.6 103.3 Mix red yellow brown and brown with dark gray 20.5 105.2 fragments, silty SAND (SM), medium dense, occasional . common sandstone and siltstone, fragments, traces of gypsum crystals, moist. ROCKFILL (Raf): Orange brown, clayey sandy ROCKFILL (GC), difficult excavation, moist to very moist. Practical refusal at 6± feet No groundwater encountered No sloughing Backfilled -· ---·--·-' ------·--,_ --- GEOSOILS, INC. · JUNE 20, 1995 TEST DEPTH PIT# (Fl) .. Lot 40 0-½ T-5 ½-2 2-3½ 3½-7 @7 SAMPLE GROUP DEPTH SYMBOL (Ft.) SM SM SM SM 4;0 6.0 GC W. 0. 1852-SC SUMITOMO BANK LOG OF TEST PITS · DRY PERCENT DENSITY MOISTURE (PCF) DESCRIPTION ·. ARTIFICIAL FILL (af): Light brown, silty SAND (SM), loose occasional common rootlets, dry. Light yellow brown, silty SAND (SM) with occasional sandstone/siltstone rock fragm~nts, loose to medium dense moist. Dark gray silty fine SAND (SM) with common sandstone/Siltstone rock fragments, medium dense, moist. 13.8 104.8 Yellow brown-dark gray-orange brown, silty SAND with 18.5 101.6 common siltstone/siltstone rock fragments, medium . dense,~ local very sandy layers, traces of gypsum crystals, moist. ROCKFILL (Raf): Orange brown, clayey sandy ROCKFILL (GC), difficult excavation, moist to very moist. Practical refusal at 7 feet No groundwater encountered No sloughing· Backfilled ------------------- GEOSOILS, INC. JUNE 20, 1995 TEST DEPTH PIT# (Ft.) Lot 39 0-.½ T-6 ½-4 @4 SAMPLE GROUP DEPTH SYMBOL (Ft.) SM SM/SW 3.0 SM/GC W. 0. 1852-SC SUMITOMO BANK LOG OF TEST PITS DRY PERCENT DENSITY MOISTURE (PCF) DESCRIPTION ARTIFICIAL FILL (afl: Light brown, silty SAND (SM), loose qccasional common rootlets, dry. 19.8 101.4 Mixed light gray-yellow brown with orange, silty SAND (SM) and SAND (SW), loose to medium dense, common sandstone rock fragments, moist. ROCKFILL (Rafl: Dark brown silty sandy mantle · appmximately 4"± thick, orange browA and gray and green, ROCKFILL (GC), difficult excavation, very moist , with traces of free water in clayey silty $andy matrix. Practical refusal at 4 feet . No groundwater· encountered No sloughing Backfilled I I I I I I I'.. I I .I I I .I ·I I I I ·1 I 1.991 · TEST PIT-LOGS I I I -I I I I -I I I I I I I I ·1 I I I CENTRE DEVELOPMENT W.O. 1260--SD Test Pit Depth (ft.) . ' TP-24 0-1.5 TP-25 0-8 MARCH 21, 1991 TEST PIT LOG Material Description BEDROCK~ SANTIAGO FORMATION: Olive gray moist dense laminated fine sandy SILT with red ·orange mottling or few bedding planes. Bedding attitudes: N20E/6°SE, N40E, 10SE. Total Depth= 1!5 feet ARTIFICIAL FILL: Gray brown, dry, medium dense, silty SAND with clay. @l' Becomes •oist. @2' Becomes brown, moist, dense, clayey SAND. @4 1 Becomes dark gray, moist, dense micaceous sandy SILT to silty fine SANb. @6' Becomes yellow brown, moist, dense silty fine SAND. @7.5' Becomes blue gray VOLCANIC rock fragments in a red brown moist, clayey SAND matrix (rock fill). ·Practical refusal at a feet. -7- GeoSoiJs, lne. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CENTRE DEVELOPMENT W.O. 1260-SD Test Pit Depth. (ft.) TP-26 TP-27 0-8 MARCH 21, 1991 TEST PIT LOG Material.Description ARTIFICIAL FILL: Gray brown, dry, medium dense, silty SAND with clay. ·@1 1 Becomes moist. @2 1 Becomes brown, moist, dense, clayey SAND. @4' Be9omes dark gray, moist, dense micaceous sandy SILT to silty fine SAND. @6' Becomes yellow brown, ·moist, dense silty fine SAND. @7.5' Becomes blue gray VOLCANIC rock fragments in ·a red brown moist, clayey SAND matrix (rock fill). P~actical refusal at 8 feet. ARTIFICihL FILL: Gray brown, dry, dense, silty fine SAND. @1.5' Becomes ~oist. @2.5' Becomes interlayered brown, moist, dense, clayey SAND and gray brown moist, dense micaceous silty SAND. @8' Becomes small cobble size volcanic rock fragments in a moist red brown clay matrix (rock fill). Practical refusal at 8 feet. -a- GeoSoils, Inc. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CENTRE DEVELOPMENT W.O. 1260-SD Test Pit Depth (ft.) TP-28 0-3 3+ TP-29 0-4 4-5 TP-30 0-4 4+ MARCH 21, 1991 TEST PIT LOG Material Description ARTIFICIAL FILL: Brown, dry, dense, silty fine SAN? to clayey SAND. @.5~ Becomes •oist. BEDROCK -SANTIAGO PEAK VOLCANICS: Blue gray and red brown, dense' fractured and weathered _ _..ve>J._c;:anic rock. Practical refusal at 3 feet. ARTIFICIAL FILL: ~ray brown, dry, dense, to medium dense, fine sandy SILT to silty fine SAND. @.5 1 Becomes yellow brown and moist. BEDROCK -SANTIAGO PEAK VOLCANICS: Blue gray and red brown, dense fractured and weathered VOLCANIC rock and clay matrix along fractures. Joint attitude N25W, 70SW. ·Total Dept.h= 5 feet ARTIFICIAL FILL: Brown, dry, dense, silty to ·clayey SAND. @.5 1 Becomes moist. BEDROCK -SANTIAGO PEAK VOLCANICS: Blue gray and red brown, dense fractured volcanic rock and moist CLAY ma~rix along fracture. Total Depth= 4 feet -9- Gea$oils, Inc. I I I I I . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CENTRE DEVELOPMENT W.O. 1260-SD Test Pit Depth (ft.) TP-31 0-3.5 TP-·32 0-10 MARCH 21, 1991 TEST PIT LOG Materiai Description ARTIF!CIAL FILL: Gray brown, dry, dense, silty ~ine SAND . @.5 1 Becomes yellow brown, moist, dense fine sandy SILT to silty SAND. 3. 5 ·1 Blue gray volcanic rock fragments in red brown CLAY matrix (rock fill). Total Depth= 3.5 feet ARTIFICIAL FILL: Yellow brown, dry, medium dense silty fine SAND. @1.5 1 Becomes interlayered brown, moist, dense silty to clayey fine SAND and dark to light gray dense SAND. , @2' Yellow brown moist, dense clayey to silty SAND brown moist dense sandy CLAY and dark gray to blocky clayey SAND and red brown, dry, sandy SILT. Few stems and twigs, musty organic odor. Occurs as thin layer 0.5 to 1 foot thick. ·@5' Red brown and dark gray brown, moist qense clayey SAND and yellow brown moist dense silty fine SAND. As thin layers .5 to 1 foot thick. Total Depth= 10 feet. -10- GeoSoils. Jne. I I ,, . ·,. I -I· I I . I . I I 1. I I . 1· I I·. I I '' APPENDIX II . . · LABO RA TORY TESTING I I I ·1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SUMITOMO BANK W.0. 1852-SC 1 T-1 Lot J9 2 T-2 Lot 40 3 T-2 Lot 40 4 T-3 Lot 40 5 T-4 Lot 40 6 T-5 Lot 40 7 T-6 Lot 39 TABLE I FIELD DENSITY DATA SHEET -4' 121.5 22.5 -4' 122.2 19.8 -6' 112.8 22.1 -5' 104.0 21.8 3' 121.5 17.6 -4' 119.3 13.8 -3' 121.5 19.8 JUNE 20, 1995 E 99.2 87 H 102.0 89 E disturbed disturbed E disturbed disturbed B 103.3 89 B 104.8 91 B 101.4 88 I I I I I I ·1 I I I I I I I I I I I I " IL. CIJ II.. ,_, :c I-(!) z IJJ· ~ I-CIJ ~ <I: w :c CIJ 3000 2500 2000 r /' ~ '1500 ~ ~'.· 1000 ~ ~ 500 0 0 500 ~ . 1000 1500 NORMAL STRESS (PSF) Exploration: T-2 Depth: 4.0' 2000 2500 3000 Test Nethod: Results: Remolded to 90¼, 115.0 pcf@ 17.0¾ Sample Innundated Prior To Testing DtRl::CT SHEAR TEST RESULTS Cohesion (psf): 629.0 Friction Angle: 23.4 Cl lent: Sumitomo 1,.1. 0.: 1852-SC Date: June 1995 Fi sure: SH-1 I I I I I· I· I ,.... ~ ., V z H <C ~ I-1· (/) I-z w u ~ I w 0. I I I ·1 I I I I I 0 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 100 --- 2 ~ I"'. [\ \ • •h "---.. ......... 4 6 Exploration: T-1 Depth: 6.0' ---~ ~ \ \ i--,-... r-------....... ·r----.... 1000 2 STRESS CPSF) I\ \ 11 \ \ I\ \ \ r---\ r--r--1---1-111 4 6 10000 2 Undisturbed Ring Sample Drw Densitw (pcf): 99.3 Water Content (¾): 23.1 Sample Innundated@ 750 psf CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Cl lent: Sumitomo I,.J,O.: 1852-SC Date: June 1995 Fi sure: C-1 I I I I I I -II I " X I v z H <r 0:: I- I Gil I-z LI.I 0 0:: ,I LI.I ·a. I I I I I I I I I. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100 -- ( 2 -~ ~ I"-. .. • 4k__ 1------..: 1---- 4 6 Exploration: T-2 Depth: 6.0' u~ ~ ~ \, \ [\ \ ----.. -------------\ .. "--1 .______ I -----------I---N t 1000 2 4 6 10000 2 STRESS CPSF) Undisturbed Rfng Sampte Drw Den~it~ (pcf): 95.8 Water Content(¾): 21.4 Sample Innundated@ 750 psf CONSOLIDATION T~ST RESULTS Client: Sumitomo W.O.: 1852-SC Date: June 1995 Figure: C-2 I I ·I I I I I r, I ~ ..., z H <C r:t: I-I Cl) I-z lJJ (;) r:t: I lJJ a. I I I I I I I I :I 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100 .. . r--- 2 l'e-I'-- -·-r--- 4 i"-. r-. .. ' t--~"' "'- r--- --------1---t---r----_ ---- 6 1000 2 STRESS (PSF) Exploration: T-4 Depth: 5.0' ~ ~ I'\. '\ I\ \ i\ I\ I\ -i---r----µ. ,__ -I--t--t- 4 6 10000 2 Undisturbed Ring Sample Dry Density (p~f): 106.5 Wat~r Content(¾): 20.5 Sample Innundated@ 720 psf GONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Client: Sumitomo W.O.: 1852-SC Date: June 1995 Fi sure: C-3 I I I I I I I ,.. ~ I "' z H CZ: IX t-I en t-z 111 0 IX I 111 0.. I I I I I I I I I Sr-----+------,1-----,1---t--t----,1--1-+-+------+----+---+-----,1---1---1---l--l-ll-------l St------+-------i-----,1---t---t---l-t-+-+---'-----+----+---+-----i--+--+--l--l-l------J 7 t------t----t-----i--t--+-t-t-+-+------+---+---+--t-+--+--+-+-1------1 Bt---'----+------ll------,t----t--t----,1--1-+-t------"--+----+---+---:-il---+--+--+---l-l,-------J 9....._ ____ ..__----e, _ __, _ _.__.___,__,___.___,_ ____ --'-'-----'-----'----'--'----'---'--.J.-1--------' 100 2 4 6 1000 2 4 6 10000 2 STRESS <PSF) ExploratiGn: T-5 Depth: 6.0' Und~sturbed Rins Sample Dry Density (pcf): 102.5 Water Content (Y.): 18.5 Sample Innundated@ 720 psf CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Cl lent: Sumitomo W.O,: 1852-SC Date: J"une 1995 Figure: C-4 I ,_ I I -I· I APPENDIX.Ill I EQFAULT . . I· I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I I 1· I I I .1 I I I I I I I -1 I I DATE: Thursday, June 8. 1995 ************************************* * * * EQFP,ULT * * * * Ver. 2.01. ~ * * * * ************************************* (Estimation of Peak Horizontal Acceleration From Digittz~d California Faults) SE~RCH PERFORMED FOR: SUMITOMO JOB NUMBER: 1852-SC JOB NAM~: CARLSBAD AIRPORT CENTER LOTS 39 & 40 SITE COORDINATES: LATITUDE: 33.125 N LONGITUDE: 117.288 W SEARCH RADIUS: 100 mi ATTENUATION RELATION: 13) Saditih et al. ( 1989 j Hor 1z .. -Rock UNCER_TAINTY (M=Mean, S=Mean+l-Sigma): M SCOND: 0 COMPUTE PEAK HORIZONTAL ACCELtRATION FAULT-DATA FILE USED: CALIFLT.DA~ SOURCE OF DEPTH VALUES (A=Attenuatton File, F=Fault Data File): A ,··. I 1· I I I I I I I I I· I I I· I· DETERMINISTIC SITij PARAMETERS Page l ~-------------------------------·------· -·-··------------·---·-------------------------------- I I :MAX. CREDIBLE EVENT: :MAX. PROBABLE EVENT: : APPROX. :-------------------:: ---------------~: ABBREVIATED :DISTANCE : MAX.: PEAK : SITE : : MAX.: PEAK : SITE : FAULT NAME : mi (km) : CRED.: SITE : INTENS: l PROB. l SITE : INTENS: l : l MAG . : ACC . g : MM : l MAG . : ACC . g : MM : I >· . I I I . I I I _____ ,· ______ I ______ I f --~ I I . I I I I r I : :sLUE cuT : so (12~1: 7.oo: 0.016: rv : : 6.00: 0.006: II , : --------------· ----------:---------:-----'------:------: :-----'---.--:------: :soRREGO MTN. (San .Jacinto): 64' (103): 6.50 0.01s: IV l 5.75 0.007: II : :--------------------· --:--------:-------·-:------: -----------:------: :cAMP ROCK-EMER.-COPPER MTN: 95 (153)l 7.00 0.012: III l ·s.7.5 0.004: I : , ________ ----------------:---------:-----------:--~---: -----------:------: CASA LOMA~CLARK (S.Jactn.): 47 ( 76): 7.00 0.039: V : 6.7S 0.031: V --------------------------:---------:-----,-----:---: -----------:------: CATALINA ESCARPMENT : 38 ( 62): 7.oo:. 0.054: VI : 6.2s: 0.029: V : -------------------------:---------:-----:------:------: :-----:------:------: CHINO : 49 ( 78): 7 .00 I O .044: VI I : 5 .SO I O .012: I I I I ----·----·--------------:--------:-----:---.--:--·---: :-----:------:-----: COYOTE CREEK (San Jacinto):· 50 ( 80)1 7.00I 0.0361 V I I 5.75: 0.012: III : I ' i I I I I J I : --------------------------,---------,-----,------------, ,-----,------,------, :cucAMONGA , ;,3 ( 117); 7 .oo: o .02:.:.:: rv : : 6 .2s' o .011: III : :---------------------------:. : : : :-----------;------: :ELSINORE 24 ( 38): 7.50l 0.143: VIII : : 6.75 o.osa: VII : :-----------------------------------·----:: .-----:------: :-----------:------: !E~YSIAN PARK SEISMIC ZONE 79 (147) 7.oo: 0.020l IV : : 5.75 0.006: II ,--------.. ----------·----------------:------:-·----: :-----______ , ______ , :GLN.HELEN-LYTLE CR-CLREMNT, 51 ( 81) 7.oo: 0.035; V : : 6.50 o.022l IV : :--------------------------'---------I I I I I :HELENDALE I -----,------,-----I,-----------:------: ,,~---------------· _________ ; 1 _~~-~~~~)11 _~~~~-: 1 '_~2~~~·,:~-~~--!, ! 5.75! 0.004! I i .-----.------.------, :H~MESTEAD VALLEY : 95 (',152): 7.50: 0.019: IV : : 4.oo: 0.001: :· :-------------------·-------:---------:, ----:------: ------: :-----:----. -l------: :HoT S-BUCK RDG.(S.Jacinto)l 50 ( 81)l 7.oo: 0.035l V l l 6.00: 0.014: IV : :------------------------·-!---------!----·',------~------•, , _____ . ______ , ______ , I I I ! :JOHNSON \/ALLEY : 87 (140): 7.so: 0.0221 IV : : s.2s: 0.003: ----------------------:----~---:-----:------:------: :-----:------:------: lLA NACION l 21 ( 34): 6r50l 0.103l VII l l 4.2s: 0.01s: IV : :--------------------------:---·-----:-----:------:------: :-----:------:------1 :LENWOOD-OLD WOMAN SPRINGS : 92 (~47): 7.30: 0.017: IV· l l 5.25: 0.002: : :------------------·-------:---------:-----:------:------: :, ----:------:------: ~MALIBU COAST : 96 (155): 7.50l 0.022: IV l l 6.so: o.ooa: III : :--------------------------:-----·---:-----:------:------: :--~-:------:------: :NEWPORT-INGLEWOOD-OFFSHORE: 10 ( 16): 7.oo: 0.258: IX : : 5.75: 0.117: VII : --------------------------: ----------: -----:. ------: . -----: : -----I------:------: lNORTH FRONTAL FAULT ZONE I 79 (1~8)l 7.70l 0.030l V l: 5.75 o.oos: II l :--------------------------:--------:-----:------:------: :-----------:------: IPALOS VERD-CORON.8.-A.BLANI 22·( 35)l 7.501 0.159: VIII I l 6.75 0.099l VII l :--------------------------:--------:------1------l-----·: :-----------:------: :PINtO MOUNTAIN~ MORONGO : 73 (118) 7.30: 0.024 V. : : 5.75 0.006: II :------------------------~ :--------. -----1------------: :-----,------:------ :RAYMOND : 82 (132) 7.50l 0.029 V l: 4.oo: 0.001: 1----------------------· --:----. __ ------:------------: :-----:-----.:------: 1ROSE CANYO~ l 6 ,( 9) 7.oo: 0.384 X l l 6.00: 0.233: IX :-·---------------------:----~--------:------------: :-----:------:------: :sAN ANDREAS (Coach<:dla V.): 73 (11s): 8.001 0.044 VI :: 7.oo: 0.019; IV , :-------------------------:--------:-----:------:------: :-----:------:------: I I I I I I I I I I I 1.· I I I I I 1--- 1 OETERMIN~STIC SITE PARAMETERS -------------------------------------------------------------------------- I I -:MAX. CREDIBLE EVENT :MAX. PROBABLE EVENT: : APPROX. :orSTANCE ! mi . ( km") :-------------------:-------------------: ABBREVIATED F r-,,u1 . T NAMF : MAX.: PEAK : SITE !rRFo.: STTE :rNTfNS '. MAG-:At~. a: MM : MAX.: PEAK : STTF ! :PR()f4 ! ·.::;TTF. : Ii'ITF~-i-::.- : MAG !AC(. o! MM I ---------·----··----·---------f ·----·-----· • 1 _____ ,t ______ I--·-·-·--1 1 I I 1 -----1------;------: :sAN ANDREAS '(Mojave) : 81 (130): 8.30:: 0.048: VI : 8.00: 0.038 1 V :--------------------------:---------:----: -----:------:-----:------______ 1 I 1 • • )I ( )I 8 I O I 1 SAN ANDREAS ( s. Bern .Mtn •. 1 69 111 1 .00·1 .0491 VI : 6.75: 0.017 Iv' : :-------------------------:-------:-·---:-----:------: :-----:------------ :sAN Cl.f."MCNTE ... SAN T::,IORO : ~,S ( 88): 8.00: 0.068: \II : : r:,.r:,o: 0.019 I\/ : -----..,_ -------·--·------~ ---·------! ... -· 0 •,. ·--·-~-••• : 0 • -----· : ---00 ••• •• .. , : ,_ ••• --•NO N ••o : : --· NO• • : NOO -· • * ·-• • '0 :sAND HILL':3 : 93. ( 150): 8.00: o.o:w: './ : : 6.7<:.: 0 .. 010 IIT ! I ________________________ 1 _____ • __ 1 _____ 1 ______ , ______ 1 ! _____ • ___________ _ I ' I I -I I I I I :sAN DIEGO TRGH.-BAHIA SOL.: 32 ( 51): 7.so: 0.101: VII : : 6.2s: 0.039; \/ :------------·-----------:-----_: :-----·:--~---:------: :-----:------:--· __ _ :sAN GABRIEL : 8.6 (139): 7.oo: 0.014: IV : : 5.75: 0.004: I ! ----------··-----. ------------·-~ ---------: -----:-------: ------·-~ ; -----~ --------! -----·-· ; SAN GORGON IO -(3i~NNING ; 61 ( ,-y~); . 7. 50: 0 .01-i-?; VI : : 7 .00; 0 .030; V :--------------------------:---------:-----:--·---:------: :-----;------:------ :sANTA MONICA -HOLLYWOOD : 88 (141): 7.so: 0.026: V : : 5.2s: 0.003: I :-------------------------:-·-------:-----:------:------: :-----:------:------ :srERRA MADRE-SAN F~RNANDO : 76 (123): 7.so: 0.033: V : : 6.00: o.ooe: III 1 __________________ . _______ , _________ , _____ , ______ 1 ______ 1 ·-----'------·------ ' I ' .. I I I I I I I :suPERSTITION Hl.::,.(~ .. Jacin): 84 (1:?-S)! 7.oo: 0.015: TV :: 6.2s: 0.001: II ! ........ --------~ ... ___ -·---, . _________ I ...... ,,._. _ _,,_ , __ .. ;:. _____ I __ --· .... I .. __ ....... _ ...... I I ..... _ ........ I -· ______ I------·· I I I • I I :suPERSTTTTON MTN.(S.Jacin): 78 (126): 7.oo: 0.016: IV 6.?s: o.ooa: ITT I :--------------------------:-··------:-----:------:------:-----:------:------ :vERDUGO : 84 (136): 6.?o: 0.013: III : 4.so: 0.002: I :------------------------:---------:· ----:------:------, _____ 1 ______ 1 ______ 1 I I I I :wHITTIER -NORTH ELSINORE : 47 0 76): 7.so: d.ose: VI : 6.00: 0.016: IV 1 ~ ---------.···-----··· ··-----·-·--·-·-..... -·-: __ ,.. _____ , _____ ,. ! ~----·-:--··-0 --~ _,. ... ____ _ ---·---! __ . ____ . -END OF SEARCH-38 FAULTS FOUND WITHIN THE SPECIFIED SiARCH RADIUS. THE ROSE CANYON FAULT IS CLOSEST TO THE SITE. IT ts ABOUT 5.9 MILES AWAY. LARGEST MAXIMUM-CREDIBLE SITE ACCEL.ERATION: 0.304 g LARGEST MAXIMUM-PROBABLE SITE ACCELERATION: 0.233 g 1- ·1 I I I I I I I I- I I - I I I I I 1· I APPENDIX IV GRADING GUIDELINES I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ·I I I I I, I. A. B. II. A. B. GENERAL EARTHWORK AND GRADING GUIDELINES GENERAL These guidelines present general procedures and requirements for earthwork and grading as shown on the approved grading plans, "including preparation of area~ to filled, placement of fill, installation of subdrains and excavations. The recommendations .contained in the geotechnical report are part of the earthwork and grading guidelines and would supersede the provisions contained hereafter in the case of conflict. Evaluations ·performed by the consultant during the .course of grading may result in new recommendations which could supersede these guidelines or the recommendations contained in the geotechnical report. The contractor is responsible for the satisfactory completion of all earthwork in accordance wlth provisions of the project plans and specifications. The project soil engineer and engineering geologist (geotechnical consultant) or their representatives should provide observc;1tion and·testing services, and geotechnical consultation during the duration of the project. EARTHWORK OBSERVATIONS AND TESTING Geotechnical Consultant Prior to the commencement of grading, a qualified geotechnical consultant (soil engineer and engineering geologist) should be employed for the purpose of observing earthwork procedures and testing the fills for conformance with the recommendations of the geotechnical report, the approved grading plans, and applicable grading codes and ordinances. The geotechnical consultant should provide testing and observation so that determination may be made that the work is being accomplished as specified. It is the responsibility of the contractor to assist the consultants and keep them apprised of anticipated work schedules and changes, so that they may schedule their personnel accordingly. All clean-outs, prepared ground to receive fill, key excavations, and subdrains should be ,observed and documented by the project engineering geologist and/or soil engineer prior to placing and fill. It is the contractor's responsibility to notify the engineering geologist and soil engineer when such areas are ready for observation. Laboratory and Field Tests Maximum dry density tests to determine the degree of compaction should be performed in accordance with American Stc;1ndard Testing Materials test method ASTM designation D-1557-78. Random field compaction.tests should be performed in accordance with test method ASTM designation D-1556-82, 0-2937 or D-2922 and D-3017, at intervals of approximately two (2) feet of fill height or every 100 cubic yards of fill placed. These GeoSoils, Ine. I I I I .I I I I I ·1 I I I I I I I I I General Earthwork anc;I Grading Guidelines Sumitomo Bank Page 2 W.O. 1852-SD criteria would vary depending on the soil conditions and the size of the project. The location and frequency of testing would be at the discretion of the geotechnical consultant. C. Contractor's Responsibility All clearing, site preparation, and earthwork performed on the project should be conducted by the contractor, with observation by geotechnical consultants and staged approval by the governing agencies; as applicable. It is the contractor's responsibility to prepare the ground surface to receive the fill, to the satisfaction of the soil engineer, and to place, spread, moisture condition, mix and compact the fill in accordance with the recommendations of the soil engineer. The contractor should also remove all major non- earth material considered unsatisfactory by the soil engineer. · It is the sole responsibility of the contractor to provide adequate equipment and methods to accomplish the earthwork in accordance with applicable grading guidelines, codes or agency ordinances, and approved grading plans. Sufficient watering apparatus and compaction equipment should be provided by the contractor with due consideration for the fill material, rate of placement, and climatic conditions. If, in the opinion of the geotechnical consultant, unsatisfactory conditions such as questionable weather, excessive oversized rock, or deleterious material, insufficient support equipment, etc., are resulting in a quality of work that is not acceptable, the consultant will inform the contractor, and the contractor is expected to rectify the conditions, and if necessary, stop work until conditions are satisfactory. During construction, the contractor shall properly grade all surfaces to maintain good drainage and prevent ponding of water. The contractor shall take remedial measures to control surface water and to prevent erosion of graded areas until such time as permanent drainage and erosion control measures have been installed. Ill. SITE PREPARATION A. All major vegetation, including brush, trees, thick grasses, organic debris, and other deleterious material should be removed and disposed of off-site. These removals must be concluded prior to placing filL Existing fill, soil, alluvium, colluvium, or rock materials determined by the soil-engineer or engineering. geologist as being unsuitable in-place should be removed prior to fill placement. Depending upon the soil conditions, these materials may be reused as compacted fills. Any materials incorporated as part of the compacted fills should be approved by the soil engineer. 8. Any underground structures such as cesspools, cisterns, mining shafts, tunnels, septic tanks, wells, pipelines, or other structure·s not located prior to grading are to be removed or treated in a manner recommended by the soul engineer. Soft, dry, spongy, highly fractured, or otherwise unsuitable ground ·extending to such a depth that surface _ processing cannot adequately improve the condition ~hould be over-excavated down to firm ground and approved by the soil engineer before compaction and filling operations GeoSoils, Ine. I I I I -I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1· I General Earthwork and Grading Guidelines Sumitomo Bank Page 3 W.O. 1852-SD continue. Overexcavated and processed soils which have been properly mixed and moisture conditioned should be re-compacted to the minimum relative compaction as -specified in these guidelines. C. Existing ground which is determined to be satisfactory for support of the fills should be scarified to a minimum depth of six .(6). inches or as directed by the soil engineer. After .the scarified ground is brought to optimum moisture content or greater and mixed, the materials should be compacted as specified herein. If the scarified zone is grater that 6 inches in depth, it may be necessary to remove the excess and place the material in lifts restricted to about six (6) inches in compacted thickness. D. Existing ground which is not satisfactory to support compacted fill should be over- excavated as required in the geotechnical report or by the on-site soils engineer and/or engineering geologist. Scarification, disc harrowing, or other acceptable form of mixing should continue until the soils are broken down and free of large lumps or clods, until the working surface is reasonably uniform and free from ruts, hollow, hummocks, or other uneven features which would inhibit compac;:tion as des_cribed in Item 111, C, above. E. Where fills are to be placed on ground with slopes steeper than 5:1 (horizontal to vertical), the ground should be stepped or benched. The lowest bench, which will act as a key, should be a minimum of 15 feet wide and should be at least two (2) feet deep into firm material, and approved by the soil engineer and/or engineering geologist. -In fill over cut slope conditions, the recommended minimum width of the lowest bench or key is also 15 feet with the key founded qn firm material, as designated by the Geotechnical Consultant. As a general rule, unless specificaUy recommended otherwise by the Soil Engineer, the minimum width offill keys should be approximately equal to one-half (1/2) the height of the slope. F. G. IV. A. Standard benching is generally four feet (minimum) ve·rtically, exposing firm, acceptable material. Benching may be used to remove unsuitable materials, although it is understood that the vertical height of the bench may exceed four feet. Pre-stripping ma_y be considered for unsuitable materials in excess of four feet in thickness. All areas to receive fill, including processed areas, removal areas, and the toe of fill benches should be observed ahd approved by the soil engineer and/or engineering geologist prior to placement of fill. Fills may then be properly placed and compacted until design grades (elevations) are attained. COMPACTED FILLS Any earth materials imported or excavatec:I on the property may be utilized in the fill provided . that each material has been determined to be· suitable by the soil engineer. These materials should be free of roots, tree branches, other organic matter or other deleterious materials. All unsuitable materials should be removed from the fill as directed by the soil engineer. Soils of poor gradation, undesirable expansion potential, or GeoSoils, lne. I 1· I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I General Earthwork and Grading Guidelines Sumitomo Bank Page 4 W.O. 1852-SD substandard strength characteristics may be designated by the consultant as unsuitable and may require blending with other soils to serve as a satisfactory fill material. B. Fill materials derived from benching operations should be dispersed throughout the fill area and blended with other bedrock derived material. Benching operations should not result in the benched material being placed only within a single equipment width away from the fill/bedrock contact. C. Oversized materials defined as rock or other irreducible materials with a maximum dimension greater than 12 inches should not be buried or placed in fills unless the location of materials and disposal methods are specifically approved by the soil engineer. Oversized material should be taken off-site or placed in accordance with recommendations of the soil engineer in areas designated as suitable for rock disposal. Oversized material should no be placed within 10 feet vertically of finish grade (elevation) or within 20 feet horizontally of slope faces. To facilitate future trenching, rock should not be placed within the range of foundation excavatfons, future utilities, or underground construction unless specifically approved by the soil engineer and/or the aeveloper's representative. D. If import material is required for grading, representative samples of the materials to be utilized as compacted fill ·should be analyzed in the laboratory by the soil engineer to determine Us physical properties. If any material other than that previously tested is encountered during grading, an appropriate analysis of this material should b conducted by the soil engineer as soon as possible. E. Approved fill material should be placed in areas prepared to receive fill in near horizontal layers that when compacted should not exceed six (6) inches in thickness. The soil engineer may approve thick lifts if testing indicates the grading procedures are such that adequate compaction is being achieved with lifts of greater thickness. Each layer should be spread evenly and blended to attain uniformity of material and moisture suitable for compaction. F. fill layers at a moisture content less than optimum should be watered and mixed, and wet fill layers should be aerated by scarification or should be blended with drier material. Moisture· condition, blending, and mixing of the fill layer should continue until the fill materials have a unif<;>rm moisture content at or above optimum moisture. G. After each layer has been evenly spread, moisture conditioned and mixed, it should be uniformly compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of maximum density as determined by ASTM test designation, D 1557-78, or as otherwise recommended by the soil engineer. Compaction equipment should be adequately sized and should be specifically designed for soil compaction or of proven reliability to efficiently achieve the specified degree of compaction. GeoSoils, Ine. I I I I I I I I I I ·1 I I I 'I I I I I General Earthwork and Grading Guidelines Sumitomo Bank · Page 5 W.O. 1852-SD Where tests indicate that the density: of any layer of fill, or portion thereof, is below the required relative compaction, or improper moisture is in evidence, the particular layer or portion shall be re-worked until ~he required der.,sity and/or moisture content has been attained. No additional fill shall be placed in an area until the last placed lift of fill has been tested and found to meet the density and moisture requirements, and is approved by the soil engineer. H. · Compaction of slopes should be accomplished by over-building a minimum of three (3) feet horizontally, and subsequerttly trimming back to the design slope configuration. Testing shall be performed as the fill is elevated to evaluate compaction as the fill core is being developed. Special efforts may be necessary to attain the specified compaction in the fill slope zone. Final slope shaping should be performed by trimming and removing loose materials with appropriate equipment. A final determination of fill slope compaction should be based on observation and/or testing of the finished slope face. Where compacted fill .slopes are designed steeper than 2: 1 (horizontal to vertical), specific material types, a higher minimum relative compaction, and special grading procedures, may be recommended. - I. If an alternative to over-building and cutting back the compacted fill slopes is selected, then special effort should be made to achieve the required compaction in the outer 1 0 feet of each lift of fill by undertaking the following: 1) An extra piece of equipment consisting of a heavy short shanked sheepsfoot should be used to roll (horizontal) parallel to the slopes continuously as fill is placed. The sheepsfoot roller should also be used to roll perpendicular to the slopes, and extend out -over the slope to provide adequate compaction to the face of the slope. 2) Loose fill should not be spilled out over the face of the slope as each lift is compacted. Any loose fill spilled over a previously completed slope face should be trimmed off or be subject to re-rolling. 3) Field compaction tests will be made in the outer (horizontal) two (2) to eight (8) feet of the slope at appropriate vertical intervals, subsequent to compaction operations. 4) After completion of the slope, the slope face should be shaped with a small tractor and then re-rolled with a sheepsfoot to achieve compaction to near the slope face. Subsequent to testing to verify -compaction, the slopes should be grid-rolled to achieve compaction to the slope face. Final testing should be used to confirm compaction after grid rolling. 5) Where testing indicates less than adequate compaction, the contractor will be responsible to rip, water, mix and re-compact the slope material as necessary to achieve compaction. Additional testing should be performed to verify compaction. GeoSoils, Inc. I I I I· .1· I I I I I I I I I I I I I I General Earthwork and Grading Guidelines Sumitomo Bank · Page 6 . W.O. 1852-SD 6) Erosion control and drainage devices should be designed by the project civil engineer in compliance with ordinances of the controlling governmental agencies, and/or in accordance with the recommend_ation :of the soil engineer or engineering geologist. V. SUBDRAIN INSTALLATION Subdrains should be installed in approved ground in accordance with the approximate alignme.nt ~nd details indicated by the geotechnical consultant. Subdrain locations or · materials shoulc;f not be <;:hanged or modified without approval of the geotechnical _¢onsultant. The soil engineer and/or engineering geologist may recommend and direct changes in subdrain line, grade and drain material in the field, pending exposed conditions. The location of constructed subdrains should be recorded by the project civil engineer. Vt EXCAVATIONS A Excavations antj cut slopes should be examined during grading by the engineering geologist. If directed by the engineering geologist, further excavations or overexcavation and re-filling of cut areas should be performed and/or remedial grading of cut slopes should be performed. When .fill over cut slopes are to be graded, unless otherwise approved, the cut portion of the slope should be observed by the engineering geologist prior to placement of materials for construction of the fill portion of the slope. B. The engineering geologist should observe all cut slopes and should be notified by the contractor when cut slopes are started. C. If, during the course of grading, unfores.een adverse or potential adverse geologic conditions are encountered, the engineering geologist and soil engineer should investigate, evaluate and make recommendations to treat these problems. The need for cut slope buttressing or stabilizing should be based on in-grading evaluation by the engineering geologist, whether anticipated or not. D; Unless otherwise specified in soil and geological reports, no cut slopes should be excavated higher or steeper than that allowed by the ordinances of controlling governmental agencies. Additionally, short-term stability of temporary cut slopes is the contractor's responsibility. I=. Erosion central and dr~inage devices should be designed by the project civil engineer and should be constructed in compliance with the o'rdinances of the controlling governmental agencies, and/or in accordance with the recommendations of the soil engineer or engineering geologist. GeoSoils, lne. I I I I I. I I I I I· I I I I I I I I I General Earthwork and Grading Guidelines Sumitomo Bank VU. COMPLETION Page 7 W.O. 1852-SD A. ·Observation, testing and consultation by the geotechnical consultant should be conducted during the grading operations in order to state an opinion that all cut and filled areas are graded in accordance With the approved project specifications. · B. After completion of grading and after the soil engineer and engineering geologist have finished their observations of the work, final reports should be submitted subject to review by the controlling governmental agencies. No further excavation or filling should be undertaken without prior notification of the soil engineer and/or engineering geologist. C. All finished cut and fill slopes should be· protected from erosion and/or be planted in accordance with the project specifications and/or as recommended by a landscape architect. Such protection-and/or planning should be undertaken as soon as practical after completion of grading. VIII. JOB SAFETY A. General At GeoSoils, Inc. (GSI) getting the job done safely is of primary concern. The following is the company's safety considerations for use by all employees on multi-employer construction sites. On ground personnel are at highest risk of injury and possible fatality on grading and construction projects. GSI recognizes that construction activities will vary on each site and that site safety is the prime responsibility of the contractor; however, everyone must be safety conscious and responsible at all times. To achieve our goal of avoiding accidents, cooperation between the client, the contractor and GSI personnel must be maintained. In an effort to minimize risks associated with geotechnical testing and observation, the following precautions are to be implem~nted for the safety of field personnel on grading and construction projects; 1. Safety Meetings: GSI field personnel are directed to attend contractor's regularly scheduled and documented safety meetings. 2. Safety Vests: Safety vests are .provided for and are to be worn by GSI personnel at all times when they are working in the field. 3. Safety Flags: Two safety flags are provided to GSI field technicians; one is to be affixed to the vehicle when on site, the other is to be placed atop the spoil pile on all test pits. 4. Flashing Lights: All vehicles stationary in the grading area shall use rotating or flashing amber beacon, or strobe lights, on the vehicle during all field t~sting. WhHe operating a vehicle in the GeoSoils, lne. I I ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I General Earthwork and Grading Guidelines Sumitomo Bank Page 8 W.O. 1852-SD grading area, the emergency flasher on the vehicle shall be activated. In the event that the contractor's representative observes· any of our personnel not following the above, we request that it be brought to the attention of our office. 8. Test Pits Location, Orientation and Clearance The technician is responsible for selecting test pit locations. A primary concern should be the technician's safety. Efforts will be made to coordinate locations with the grading contractor's authorized representative, and to select locations following or behind the established traffic pattern, preferably outside of current traffic. The contractor's authorized representative (dump man, operator, supervisor, grade checker, etc.) should direct excavation of the pit and safety ·ouring the test period. Of paramount concern should be the soil technician's safety and obtaining enough tests to represent the fill. Test pits should be excavated so that the spoil pile is placed away form oncoming traffic, whenever possible. The technician's vehicle is to be placed next to the test pit, opposite the spoil pile. This necessitates the fill be maintained in a driveable condition. Alternatively, the contractor may wish to park a piece of equipment in front of the test holes, particularly in small fill areas or those with limited access. A zone of non-encroachment should be established for all test pits. No grading equipment should enter this zone during the testing procedure. The zone should extend approximately 50 feet outward from the center of the test pit. This zone is established for safety and ~o avoid excessive ground vibr~tion which typically decreased test results. When taking slope tests the technician should park the vehicle directly above or below the test location. If this is not pos~ible, a prominent flag should be placed at the top of the slope. The contractor's representative should effectively keep all equipment at a safe operation distance (e.g. 50 feet) away from the slope during this testing. · The technician is directed to withdraw from the active portion of the fill as soon as possible following testing. The technician's vehicle should be parked at the perimeter of the fill in a highly visible location, well away from the equipment traffic pattern. The contractor should inform our personnel al all changes to haul roads, cut and fill areas or other factors that may affect site access and site safety. In the event that the technician's safety is jeopardized or compromised as a result of the contractor's failure to comply with any of the above, the technician is required, by company policy, to immediately withdraw and notify his/her supervisor. The grading contractor's representative will eventually be contacted in an effort to ~ffect a solution. However, in the interim, no further testing will be performed until the situation is rectified. Any fill place can be . considered unacceptable and subject to reprocessing, recompaction or removal. GeoSoils, Ine. I I I I- I I I I I I I I I I I I 1. I I General Earthwork and Grading Guideli!1es Sumitomo Bank . . Page 9 W.O. 1852-SD In the event that the soil technician does not comply with the above or other established safety guidelines, we request that the contractor .bring this to his/her attention and notify this office. Effective communication and coordination between the contractor's representative and the soils technician is strongly encouraged in order to implement the above safety plan. C. Trench _and Vertical Excavation It is the contractor's responsibility to provide safe access into trenches where compaction testing is aeedecf. Our personnel are directed not to enter any excavation or vertical cut which 1) ar~ 5 feet or deeper unless shored or laid back, 2) displays any evidence of instability, has any loose_ rock or other debris which could fall into the trench, or 3) displays any other evidence of any unsafe conditions regardless of depth. All trench excavations ot vertical cuts in excess of 5 feet deep, which a persons enters, should be shored or laid back. Trench access should be provid~d in accordance with OSHA and/or state and local standards. bur personnel are directed not to enter any trench by being lowered or "riding down" on the equipment. If the contractor fails to provide safe access to trenches for compaction testing, our company policy requires that the soil technician withdraw and notify his/her supervisor. The contractor's representative will eventually be contacted in an effort to effect a solution. All backfill not tested due to safety .concerns or other reasons could be subject to reprocessing and/or removal. --If GSI personnel become aware of anyone working beneath an unsafe trench wall or vertical excavation, we have a legal obligation to put the contractor and owner/developer on notice to immediately correct the situation. If corrective steps are not taken, GSI then has an obligation to notify CAL:.OSHA and/or the proper authorities. GeoSoils, lne. I I I I I 1· I I; I I I I I I I I I I I ·CANYON SUBDRAIN DETAIL TYPE A SEE ALTERNATIVES TYPE 8 ----~------~-------~--------------- , PROPOSED COMPACTED FILL '\ ' '\ . -'-. ', . _,,.-NATURAL GROUND -=:'\. ,~ . l4\\\_t ', t'lt ' ' .......... -------------------- SEE ALTERNATIVES NOTE: ALTERNATIVES, LOCATION ANO EXTENT OF SU BO RAINS SHOULD BE DETERMINED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER ANO/OR ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST DURING GRADING. PLATE EG-1 I I I- I 1: I ·1 I I I I I ·1 I I I· 1· I I CANYON SUBD-RAJN ALTERNATE DETAILS ALTERNATE t PERFORATED PIPE. AND FILTER MATERIAL A-1 FILTER MATERIAL SIEVE SIZE 1 INCH J/ 4 INCH 3/8 INCH NO. 4 NO. 8 NO. 30 ·No. SO NO.200 PERCENT PASSING 100-· 90-100 40__;100 25--40 18-33 -s-rs: .0-1 0-3 ALTERNATE 2: PERFORATED PIPE, GRAVEL AND FILTER FABRIC ~NIMUM OVERLAP 5• MINIMUM OVER~~, .. . . w~, j :-:-· /.. 4 • MINIMUM BEDDING ~ •• :o;: 0' . 'IV' ~ I GRAVEL MATERIAL 9 FT'/LINEAR FT. 8-2 PERFORATED PIPE: SEE ALTERNA~ 1 GRAVEL: CLEAN 3/ 4 INOi ROCK OR APPROVED SUBSTITUTE FILTER FABRIC: MIRAFI 140 OR APPROVED SUBSTITUTE PLATE EG-2 I 1- 1- I· .I I .I I I ·1: I -I I I I I I I. I DETAIL FOR FILL SLOPE TOEING OUT ON FLAT ALLUVIA TED CANYON TOE OF SLOPE AS SHOWN ON GRADING PLAN -. l . COMPACTED FILL ORIGINAL GROUND SURFACE TO BE . ~RESTORED WITH COMPACTED FILL -:2:::G:L.::~u~~ BACKcuf'\~ARll,S. FOR DEEP REMOVALS,/...$'+ . r BACKCUT \I\.SHOULD BE MADE NO /...-$'~ I STEEPER ·THA~:1 OR AS NECESSARY <~~ ANTICIPATED ALLUVIAL REMOVAL FOR SAFETY '-~'-CONSIDERATIONS. / ~ 7 1 DEPTH PER SOIL ENGINEER. ~/~ // '''lb~/\ ~\~ //~~PROVIOO ;;-~IMUM ;;O~C~N7R;;-TOE;;- -SLOPE AS SHOWN ON GRADING PLAN TO THE RECOMMENDED REMOVAL DEPTH. SLOPE HEIGHT. SITE CONDITIONS ANO/OR LOCAL CONOiTIONS COULD DICTATE FLATTER PROJECTIONS. REMOVAL ADJACENT TO EXISTING FILL ADJOINING CANYON FILL --------~~------------ PROPOSED AOO-ITIONAL COMPACTED FILL COMPACTED FILL LIMITS LINE\ , TEMPORARY COMPACTED FILL --)., FOR DRAINAGE ONLY --_.- Qa f ...,~'a, Qaf /~ (TO BE REMOVED! ~ !EXISTING COMPACTED Fl~U ~',, / ~'\.~~ . -~ k~~\~JWR1''' ' LEGEND '11JAYJ/JA\vTf\ ?=-\ TO BE REMOVED BEFORE Qaf ARTIFICIAL FILL PLACING ADDITIONAL COMPACTED FILL Qal ALLUVIUM PLATE EG-3 -·---.,_,_ --------------- "1) r )> --i m m G) I ~ TYPICAL STABILIZATION / BliTTRESS FILL DETAIL 15. TYPICAL 1-2· ---"'"':zr'.zn:1,\-l:.-\.:,-;;,Jh:a ... _ ... <\*,J< OUTLETS TO BE SPACED AT 100.MAXIMUM INTERVALS, AND SHALL EX TEND 12· BEYOND THE FACE OF SLOPE AT TIME OF ROUGH GRADING COMPLETION: le •I BLANKET FILL IF RECOMMENDED BY THE SOIL ENGINEER DESIGN FINISH SLOPE 10· MINIMUM ,,t7i;mm----.-- :.-.ii l\\ 11A..~ -, -4. DIAMETER NON-PERFORATED OUTLET PIPE ~ AND BACKDRAIN (SEE Al TERNA TIVESI ~ ~ ~.,"-\ J'MINIMUM KEY DEPTH -------------------- TYPICAL STABILIZATION / BUTTRESS SUS DRAIN DETAIL 4 • MINIMUM PIPE 4. MINIMUM "lJ r )> --f m m G) I 01 :[ ::, :[ z :[ N r MINIMUM FILTER MATERIAL: MINIMUM OF FIVE Ffl/LINEAR Fl OF PIPF OR FOUR FP/LINEAR Ft OF PIPE WHEN PLACED fN SQUARE .,-FIL~ER MATERIAL.SHALL BE OF CUT TRENCH. THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICATION ALTERNATIVE IN LIEU Of ~ILTER MATERIAL: GRAVEL MAY Bi OR AN APPROVED EQUIVALENT: ENCASED IN APPROVED FILTER FABRIC. FILTER FABRIC SIEVE SIZE _PEHCENT PASS!tl.G.. SHAl,.L BE MIRAFI 140 OR EQUIVALENT. FILTER FAaRIC SH_ALL BE LAPPED A MINIMUM OF 1 r ON ALL JOINTS. MINIMUM 4· DIAMETER "PIPE: ABS-~STM D-2751. SOR 35 OR ASTM 0-1527 SCHEDULE 40 PVC-ASTM 0-3034, SOR 35 OH ASTM 0-178·5 SCHEDULE 40 WITH A CRUSHING STRENGTH OF 1,000 POUNDS MINIMl,JM, AND A MINIMUM OF 8 UNIFORMLY SPACED PERFORATIONS PER FOOT OF PIPE INSTALLED WITH PERFORATIONS OF BOTTOM OF PIPE. PROVIDE CAP AT UPSTREAM ENO OF PIPE. SLOPE AT 2% TO OUTLET PIPE. OUTLET PIPE TO BE CONNECTED TO SU BDRAIN PIPE WITH TEE OR ELBOW. t-OTE: 1. TRENCH FOR OUTLET PIPES TO BE BACKFILLED WITH ON-SITE SOIL. 2. BACKDRAINS AND LATERAL llRAINS SHALL BE LOCATED AT ELEVATION OF EVERY BE NCH DRAIN. FIRST DRAIN LOCATED AT ELEVATION JUST ABOVE LOWER LOT GRADE. ADDITIONAL DRAINS MAY BE REQUIRED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE SOILS ENGINEER ANO/OR ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST. 1 INCH 100 3/ 4 INCH 90-1-0-0 3/ 8 INCH I.. 0-1-00 NO. 4 25-40 NO. 8 18-3 3 NO. 3:0 5-15 NO. 50 0-7 NO. 200 0-3 GRAVEL SHALL BE OF THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICATION OR AN APPROVED EQUIVALENT: _sjEVE SIZE _PER.QE_NT PASSINQ 1 1/2 INCH NO. 4 NO. 200 100 50 8 SAND EQUIVALENT: MINIMUM OF 50 --------~----------~- FILL OVER NATURAL DE·TAIL SIDEHILL FILL COMf-ACTEO. FILL PROPOSED GRADE TOE OF SLOPE AS SHOWN ON GRADING PLAN PROVIOI; A 1:1 MINIMUM PROJECTION FROM DESIGN TOE OF SLOPE TO TOE OF KEY AS SHOWN ON AS BUILT NATURAL SLOPE TO BE RESTORED WITH ----- 4' MINIMUM -; I -::E: MINlt,!UM . NOTE: 1. WHERE THE NATURAL SLOPE APPROACHES OR EXCEEDS THE -u r )> -t m m G) I 0) 15' MINIMUM KEY WIDTH 2'X 3' MINIMUM KEY DEPTH 2' MINIMUM IN BEDROCK OR APPROVED MATERIAL. DESIGN SLOPE RA TIO. SPECIAL RECOMMENDATIONS WOULD BE PROVIDED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. 2. THE NEED FOR ANO DISPOSITION OF DRAINS WOULD BE DETEHMINEO BY THE SOILS ENGINEER BASED UPON EXPOSED CONDITIONS. -·-----·------------------ FILL OVER CUT DET A-IL CUT/Fill CONTACT 1. AS SHOWN ON GRADING PLAN MAINTAIN MINIMUM 15' FILL SECTION FROM BACKCUT TO FACE OF FINISH SLOPE 2. AS SHOWN ON AS BUil T H ORIGINAL TOPOGRAPHY CUT SLOPE /; r;, //\~ BEDROCK OR AP~V,~D MA TE RIAL --0 r )> -I rn rn . G) I :'...:J . COMPACTED FILL BENCH WIDTH ·t-1AY VARY 15' MINIMUM OR H/2 NOl'E: THE CUT PORTION OF THE SLOPE SHOULD BE EXCAVATED AND EVALUATED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER AND/OR ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTING THE FILL PORTION. ---------------------- '"1) r )> --i n, n, G} I 00 STABILIZATION FILL FOR UNSTABLE MATERIAL Hl EXPOSED IN ·pQRTl"ON OF CUT SLOPE . NATURAL SLOPE REMOVE: UNSTABLE MATERIAL . ~ )..a. .. ~ ................. . ~ UNWEATHEREO BEDROCK OR APP.ROVED MATERIAL REMOVE: UNSTABLE -1 «//\."-' ff ~' MATERIAL ~JI. -COMPACTED STABILIZATION FILL I( ~..\7 ~ --i 1• MINIMUM TILTED BACK ~ 1/\v..J/J, -.L::l IF RECOMMENDED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER AND/OR ENGINEERING t-~ W2_ GEOLOGIST. THE REMAINING CUT PORTION OF THE SLOPE MAY 'fee»~«.'>,,._.. Wl ~/ -'REQUIRE REMOVAL ANO REPLACEMENT WITH COMPACTED FILL. NOTE: 1. 2. SUBDRAINS ARE NOT REQUIRED UNLESS SPECIFIED BY SOILS ENGINEER AND/OR ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST. ·w· SHALL BE EQUIPMENT WIDTH 11s·1 FOR SLOPE HEIGHTS LESS THAN 25 FEET. FOR SLOPES GREATER THAN 25 FEET ·w· SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE PROJECT SOILS ENGINEER AND /OR ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST. AT NO TIME SHALL ·w· BE LESS THAN H/2 . . .,,, 1_ I I I 1· I 1. I I I I I I I I I I I I TRANSJTIO·N LOT DETAIL CUT LOT (MA TE:RIAL TYPE TRANSITION) ---~------------- PAO GRADE -~ -~ TYPICAL BENCHING CUT-f=ILL LOT (DAYLIGHT TRAt~S!TION) NOTE: * DEEPER OVEREXCAVATlo"N MAY B·E RECClMMENDED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER AND/OR ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST IN STEEP CUT-FILL TRANSITION AREAS. - PLATE EG-11 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I . . OVERSIZE ROCK DISPOSAL VIEWS ARE DIAGRAMMATIC ONLY. ROO< SHOULD NOT TOUa-i ANO VOIDS SHOULD BE COMPLETELY FILLED. IN. VEIW NORMAL ro SLOPE FACE PROPOSED FINISH GRADE 10' MINIMUM (E) co co Cl) c:O H \::)~NIMU~~) (.B) 00 dO (GI C:P 00 QO D 00 (F) co c,:::, VIEW PARALLEL TO SLOPE FACE PROPOSED FINISH GRADE t-1 oo· MAXIMUM (Bli.t ~00 a~ 10" MINIMUM (GJ ~ c,a:x;:p (FJ NOTE: (A) ONE EQUIPMENT WIDTH OR A MINIMUM OF 15 FEET. . (B) HEIGHT ANO WIDTH MAY VARY DEPENDING ON ROCK SIZE AND TYPE OF EQUIPMENT USED. LENGTH OF WINDROW SHALL BE NO GREATER THAN 100' MAXIMUM. . (Cl IF APPROVED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER ANO/OR ENGINEERNG GEOLOGIST, WINDROWS MAY BE PLACED O"IRECTLY ON COMPETENT MATERIALS OR BEDROCK PROVIOED A-DEOUATE SPACE IS AVAILABLE FOR COMPACTION. (OJ ORIENTATION OF WINDROWS MAY VAR"Y BUT SHALL BE AS RECOMMENDED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER ANO/OR ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST. STAGGERING OF WINDROWS IS NOT NECESSARY UNLESS RECOMMENDED. (E-J CLEAR AREA FOR UTILITY TRENCHES, FOUNDATIONS ANO SWIMMING POOLS. lFI VOIDS IN WINDROW SHALL BE FILLED BY FLOODING GRANULAR SOIL INTO PLACE. GRANULAR SOIL SHALL BE ANY SOIL WHICH HAS A UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIACATION SYSTEM (USC 2 g ..... 1 J DESIGNATION OF SM, SP, SW, G2, GR GW. ALL ALL OVER ANO AROUND ROCK WINDROW SHALL Be COMPACTED TO 90% RELATIVE COMPACTION. . - (Gl AFTER FILL BETWEEN WINDROWS IS PLACED AND COMPACTED WITH THE LIFT OF FILL COVERING WINDROW, WINClROW SHALL BE PROOF ROLLED WITH A 0-9 DOZER OR EQUIVALENT. (HI OVERSIZED ROCK IS DEFINED AS LARGER THAN 12• AND LESS THAN I. FEET . ' INSIZ£. PLATEEG-12 I I I I I I 1. I I I I I I I I I I I I ROCK DISPOSAL PITS FILL LIFTS COMPACTED OV;'.R r-~O~K:~~ ~~~:E:T _)_ _ ___. I I COMPACTED FILL GRANULAR MA TE RIAL LARGE ROCK SIZE OF EXCAVATION TO BE COMMENSURATE WITH ROCK SIZE. NOTE: 1. LARGE ROCK IS OE.FINED AS ROCK LARGER THAN 4 FEET IN MAXIMUM SiZE. 2. PIT IS EXCAVATED INTO COMPACTED FILL TO A DEPTH EQUAL TO 1/2 OF ROCK SIZE. 3. GRANULAR SOIL SHOULD BE PUSHED INTO PIT AND DENSIFIED BY FLOODING. USE A SHEEPSFOOT AROUND ROCK TO AID IN COMPACTION. 4. A MINIMUM OF 4 FEET OF REGULAR COMPACTED FILL SHOU LO OVER LIE EACH PIT. 5. PITS SH·OULD BE SEPARATED BY AT LEAST 15 FEET HORIZONTALLY. 6. PITS SHOULD NOT BE PLACED WITHIN 20 FEET OF ANY FILL SLOPE. 7. PITS SHOULD ONLY BE USED IN DEEP FILL AREAS. PLATE EG-13 I I I I I I: I I I I I I. I I I I I ' I - TEST PIT SAFETY DIAGRAM 50 FEET SPOIL P1LE SiOE VIEW ( NOT TO SCALE ) TOP YEW 100 FE!:T j • ... q W· LL 0 an (NOTTO SCALE ) · 50 FEET - I PLATE EG-16 rt I /1 r, /1 I I :1 I I I '< ,. I I I I I I I I I • ROCK O·f SPOSAL PITS VIEWS ARE DIAGRAMMATIC ONLY. ROCK SHOULD NOT TOUCH ANO voios SHOULD BE COMPLETELY FILLED IN. FILL LIFTS c·OMPACTEO OVER ROCK AFTER EMEEOMENT r-------------------1 .I I ,--- I -. : COMPACTED FILL I i I I GRANULAR MATERIAL SIZE OF EXCAVATION TO Bl:: COMMENSURATE WITH ROCK SIZE ROCK DISPOSAL LAYERS GRANULAR SOIL TO FILL VOIDS, ( COMPACTED FILL OENSIFIEO ev FLOODING / 1-;-.;:__--.-~--- . LAYER ONE ROCK HIGH O.O:O.cl:10:t , -...... ------------.... --------- __ PROPOSED FINISH GRADE Jo· MINIMUM OR BELOW LOWEST ur1uT -----,----------.,....---~ 20' PROFILE ALONG LA YER . .... . OVERSIZE LAYER { -..., ', O::::Ca:::.o:::x:x,::o:x:O::::C~:;b:::{:;o::x-::x:.J" FILL SLOPE IcLEAR ZONE 20· MINIMUM LAYER ONE ROCK HIGH PLATE RD-2 af (Raf) Tsa Jsp s ~5. D TP-31 ·11 t-6 _...--.-. ...,.._, ----- -------------... ------- ~GENO · ARTIF-ICIAL Fill {ICG, 1993) BURIED ROCKFILL {ICG, 199~)· ~GO FOR~TiON SNfilAGO PEAKVOL.CANICS BORING (GSI, 1991) BACKHOE. ,:EST PIT (GSI, 1991) BACKHOE TEST PIT (GSI, 1995). ~STIMATIED LIMITS OF ROCKFILL GEOTECl:INICAL ·CONTACT LIMITS OF RE~OMMENDED REM~DIAI,: GRADl~--:1 .ALL LOCATlONS .ARE APPROXIMATE. ·. ;ASE MAP REPRODUCED FROM GSI REPORT DATEC>OCTOBER 1991. ·N 6 SCALE 1 ":80' i· : 1 -. • • •• -.... ~--.. 'l:_~'!11-·~.:-r-.... ~,..,--~t:-"""-l.J,. ... ~---........ ~..._ . '\ "\,"'I,_ .• ---· --· I 0. <1: :EL. Q) I ~o T- ••W ~ ....I o 110.. C/J . I ('I IO CX) - I . 0 z . 0 -~ IO O> 0). .... w· ~- w t-< C -(U -C Cl) E C e -~ w • 0 ·5, 0 0 Cl) CJ • "ii 0 ·2 .s::. 0 Cl) 0 Cl) CJ I PERFORMANCE CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE Part 1 of 3 PERF-11 PROJECT NAME DATE Ljfe Medical 2/2/02 PROJECT ADDRESS 1932 Kellogg Avenue Carlsbad PRINCIPAL DESIGNER· ENVELOPE A'tex DOCUMENTATION AUTHOR DELL CO. GENERAL INFORMATION TELEPHONE 760-732-3648 TELEPHONE (760) 940-0064 DATE OF PLANS 1 !BUILDING CONDITIONED FLOOR AREA / CLIMATE ZONE 7 1/02 4,905sq.Ft. BUILDING TYPE [Kl NONRESIDENTIAL D HIGH RISE RESIDENTIAL D HOTEUMOTEL GUEST ROOM PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION D NEW CONSTRUCTION D ADDITION [Z] ALTERATION D EXISTING + ADDITION STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE This Certificate of Compliance lists the building features and performance specifications needed to comply with Title 24, Parts 1 and 6, of the State Building Code. This certificate applies only to a Building using the performance compliance approach. DOCUMENTATION AUTHOR SIGNATURE DATE Michael Dell ~ -Z The Principal Designers hereby certify that the proposed building design repr d m the construction documents an mo fled for this permit application are consistent with all other forms and worksheets, specifications, and other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed building as designed meets the energy efficiency requirements of the State Building Code, Title 24, Pa.rt 6. ENV. L TG. MECH. '@~Rf 1. I hereby affirm that I am eligible under the provisions of Division -3 of the Business and Professions Code to sign this document as the person respom;ible for its preparation; and that I am licensed as a civil engineer, mechanical engineer, electrical engineer or architect. D D D 2. I affirm that I am eligible under the provisions of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code Section 5537.2 or 6737.3 to sign this document as the person responsible for its preparation; and that I am a licensed contractor preparing documents for work that I have contracted to perform. D D D 3. I affirm that I am eligible under Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code to sign this document because it pertains to a structure or type of work described as exempt pusuant to Business and Professions Code Sectior;is 5p37,-:5~~~. c1nd 6737.1. (These sections.of the Business and Professions Code ae printed in full in the Nonresidential Manual.) ENVELOPE COMPLIANCE . . Indicate location on plans of Note Block for Mandatory Measures PRINCIPAL ENVELOPE DESIGNER. NAME A'tex LIGHTING COMPLIANCE i-------------~--------1 Required Forms ENV-1 LIC. NO. C-18 3 71 Indicate location on plans of Note Block for Mandatory Measures PRINCIPAL LIGHTING DESIGNER -NAME A'fcx MECHANICAL COMPLIANCE 1---~------------------1 Required Forms L TG-1 r LIC.NO. C-18~ 7 I Indicate location on plans of Note Block for Mandatory Measures i------------------------1 PRINCIPAL MECHANICAL DESIGNER -NAME Action Air Conditionin EnergyPro 3.1 By EnergySoft User Number: 1712 Required Forms MECH-1 MECH-2 MECH-3 SIG..,,._,..,.,,.,._ LIC. NO. DATE 5o'/8oS-4-t'!l-OZ- Job Number: NR1-31 Page:3 of 21 TITLE 24 ·REPORT Title 24 Report for: Life Medical 1932 Kellogg Avenue . Carlsbad, CA Project Designer: A'tex 1521 Sunrise Drive Vista, CA 92084 760-732-3648 Report Prepared By: Michael Dell DELL CO. 1629 York Drive Vista, CA 92084 .. (760) 940-0064 Job Number: NR1-31 Date: 2/2/02 The EnergyPro computer.program has been used to perform the calculations summarized in this compliance report. This program has approval and is authorized by.the California Energy Commission for use with both the Residential and Nooresidential 2001 Building Energy Efficiency Standards. This program.developeifby-Gabel oodcl/EnergySoft, LLC (415) 883~5900. EnergyPro 3.1 By EnergySpft Job Number: NR1-31 User Number: 1712 ., Cover Page Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Nonresidential Performance Title 24 Forms Forrr:i ENV-MM Envelope Mandatory Measures Form L TG-MM Lighting Mandatory Measures Form MECH-MM Mecha-nical Mandatory Measures HVAC System Heating and Cooling Loads Summary EnergyPro 3.1 By Ene_rgySoft Job.Number: NR1-31 1 2 3 14 15 16 18 User Number: 1712 IPERFORMANCE CERTIFICATE OF COMPLI_ANCE Part 1 of 3 PERF-11 PROJECT NAME DATE Life Medical 2/2/02 PROJECT ADDRESS . ~ · .:. ·_.;-.,.,. ·.,-<;.;:-~.v:,v.,.?:.,·: '·· ::}. t-P-Rl~NC-1-PA_L_D,-E-Sl_i~N~-,~~~-EK_N:_~-~~--~-~-A_v_e_n_u_e_c_a_r_ls_b_a_d-,----~----+-T-E-LE_7_6_0_~ 7_E _32_-_3-'--6_4_8_--!i~~~:!:.::J~~ DOCUMENTATION AUTHOR TELEPHONE ate,, , _,,_ --_DELL CO. (.760) 940-0064 ;:,;-,. ·:·:-:·/:;;1 rncyr\:)$,1!_,., _;, GENERAL ·INFORMATION DATE OF PLANS -!BUILDING CONDITIONED FLOOR ARl;A I CLIMATE ZONE 7 1/02 · 4,905 Sq.Ft. -. - BUILDING TYPE [Kl NONRESIDENTIAL D HIGH RISE RESIDENTIAL D HOTEUMOTEL GUEST ROOM PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION D NEW CONSTRUCTION D _ADDITION ~ ALTERATION D EXISTING + ADDITION STATEMENT OF· COMPLIANCE This Certificate ofCompliance lists the building features and performance specifications needed to comply with Title 24, Parts 1 and 6, of the State Building Code. This certificate applies only to a Building using the performance compliance approach. DOCUMENTATION AUTHOR . !SIGNATURE. ~c~ ID~hlQ~ Michael Dell c..- The Principal Designers hereby certify that the proposed building design repre89f1(edm the construction documents anfl'moc;lelled for this permit application are consistent with all other forms and worksheets, specifications, and other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed building as designed-meets the e_nergy efficiency requirements of the State Building Code, Title 24, Part 6. , ENV. L TG. MECH. D D D 1. I hereby affirm that I am eligible under the provisions of Oivision 3 of the Business and Professions Code to sign this document as the person responsible for its preparation; and that I am licensed as a civil engineer, mechanical engineer, electrical engineer or architect, D 0 D-2. I affirm ~hat I am eligible under the provisions of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code Section 5537 .2 or 6737 .3 to sign this document as the person responsible for its preparation; and that I am a licensed contractor preparing documents for work that I have contracted to perform. D D D 3. I affirm that I am eligible under Division 3 of t_he Business and Professions Code to sign this document because it pertains to a structure or type of work described as exempt pusuant to Business and Professions Code Sectior:is 5537,-5q~~. ~nd 6737.1. (These sections of the Business and Professions Code ae printed in full in the Nonresidential Manual.) . ENVELOPE COMPLIANCE . . Indicate location on plans of Note Block for Mandatory Measures Required Forms ENV-1 - PRINCIPAL ENVELOPE DESIGNER-NAME I SIGNATURE' ILIC. NO. !DATE ' A'tex LIGHTING COMPLIANCE Indicate location on plans of Note Block for Mandatory Measures Required Forms LTG-1 PRINCIPAL LIGHTING DESIGNER: NAME . I SIGNATURE ILIC. NO. !DATE MECHANICAL COMPLIANCE ' Indicate location on plans of Note Block for Mandatory Measures Required Forms MECH-1 MECH-2 MECH-3 PRINCIPAL MECHANICAL DESIGNER: NAME I SIGNATURE ILIC.NO. 'DATE Action Air Conditionina By EnergySoft _ User Number: 1712 Job Number: NR1-31 Page:3 of21 I PERFORMANCE CERTIFICATE OF ~OMPLIANCE __ Part 2 of 3 PERF-11 l Life Medical ANNUAL SOURCE ENERGY USE SUMMARY ENERGY COMPONENT Space Heating Space Cooling Indoor Fans Heat Rejection Pumps & Misc. Domestic Hot Wat~r Lighting Receptacle Process TOTALS: Standard Design 7.16 22.26 16.57 0.00 0.00 Q,06 ~0,09 12.91 0.00 95.05 Proposed Design 8.81 1S:-23 18.96 0.00 0:00 5.93 29.79 12.91 0.00 94.62 Compliance Margin -1.65 4.04 -2.39 0.00 0.00 Q.12 0.31 o.od 0.00 0.43 . BUILDING COMPLIES GENERAL INFORMATI N Building Orientation (West) 270 dea Conditioned Floor Area Number of Stories 2 ·Unconditioned Floor Area Number of Systems . 6 Conditioned Footprint Area Number of Zones 6 ' DATE . 2/2/02 4,905 sqft. 0 sqft. 2,476 sqft. Orientation Gross Area · Glazina Area Glazina Ratio Remarks: · Front Elevation Left Elevation Rear Elevation Right Elevation Roof Total Lighting Power Density -Prescriptive Env. Heat Loss Prescriptive Env. Heat Gain (West) (North) ••• , I .. (Ea,st) ... (South) Standard 1.022 W/sqft. 1,657 80;853 Run Initiation Time: ·0210210212:37:10 1,176 2,091 0 40 3,307 sqft. ,_ __ __, sqft. t--------; sqft. t-----; sqft. t--------; sqft.~--~ 330 32 0 32 394 sqft sqft sqft sqft sqft. 2.4751sqft. I olsqft. Prooosed 0.941 W/sqft. 1,778 66,774 Run Code: 1012682230 EnergyPro 3.1 . · By EnergySoft Job Number:_NR1-31 28.0% 1.5% 0.0% 80.0% 11.9% 0.0%1 Page:4of21 ",. IPERFORMANCE CERTIFICATE.OF COMPLIANCE 'PROJECT NAME . _ _ Life Medical ZONE INFORMATION - System. Ni!me Zone N~me Occupancy Type Packaged.HP 1 Storage#_ 1/Ent -hJdustrial Storage Hall_ Corric!or/Restroom/Support Packa ed HP 2 & 3 1st Floor Stora e Industrial Stora e Packaged HP 4 ·-· · ---Aall/RR Corridor/Restroom/Support 2nd Floor DispJay Retail/Wholesale Sales Packa ed HP 5 & 6 2nd Floor Office Office Floor Inst. Area (sqft.) 470 158 1,802 0.55 124 2.00 606 1,745 1.07 Notes: 1. See LTG-1 (items marked with asterisk, see LTG-2 by others) 2. See LTG-3 3. See LTG-4 . EXCEPTIONAL CONDITIONS COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST_ Part 3 of 3 PERF-11 ' DATE I _ 2/2/02_ The local enforcement agency should pay special attention to the items specified in this checklist. These items require special written justification and documentation, and special verification to be used with the performance approach. The local enforcement agency determines the adequacy ofthe justification, and may reject a building or design that other:wise complies based on the adequacy of the soecial iustification and d.ocumentation submitted. Plan Field The Co~~truction Assemblv Demising Wall WO,:~~ 11 has: ~n Outs!~~ Absorptivity of 0.00. The Construction Assemblv-Demising Wall w/R-11 has an Outside Absorptivity of 0.00. The exceptional features listed in this performance approach application have specifically been reviewed. Adequate written justification and documentation for their use have been provided by the applicant. Authorized Signature or Stamp __________________ _ R n Time: 02/02/ 2 12:37:1 0 Run Code: 1012682230 EnergyPro 3.1 By EnergySoft User Number: 1712 Job Number: NR1-31 Page:5 of21 •'• -. ,-i.-•• , •• ~ • ..;",-!=;! ...... :.:: .. ·,, • , ....... ~ .. ~;·, :· ...... -l 'f·~,, • ··~ r ·r . .IENVELOPE. COMPLIANCE SUIVIMARY Performance ENV-11 I PROJECT NAME . -Life Medical DATE 2/2/02 OPAQUE SURFACES. Solar Surface Framing Act. Gains # Type . Type· Area U-Fac. Azrri. Tilt Y/N Form 3 Reference Location I Comments 1 Wall None. 278 0.709 0 90 X 7" Cone. Storaae # 1/Entrv 2 Wall None 8, 0.709 180 90 X· 7"Cone · Storaae # 1/Entrv 3 ·wan None. 110 0,709 270 90 X 7" Cone. Storaae # 1/Entrv 4 Wall Metal 126 0.163 0 90 x Demisina Wall w/R-11 . Storaae # 1/Entrv 5 Wall Wood 575 0.093 0 90 .x Demisina WalfWD-R.:11 ··-' ·1st-Floor-Storage 6· Wall None 270 0,709 270 90 X. 7 "Cone 1st Floor Storaae 7 Floor. Wood 204 0.253 0 180 X R-0 FlooUF.0.2x6.16) . 2nd Floor Display 8 Wall Norie 288 0,709 0 90 X 7" Cone 2nd Floor Display 9 Wall Wood 288 0.093 0 90 x Demising Wall-WD-R-1'1 2nd Floor Display 10 Wall None 238 0.709 270 . 90 X 7" Cone_ 2nd Floor Display 11 Roof · Wood 730 0.051 270 0 X R-19 Roof(R.19.2x8.16) 2nd Floor Display 12 Wall,.., .. .Wood .504 0.09.~---~. •l"l-.0.,, .......... ",l .•. ,90 .. •.• .)C ,Demisina.Wall WD-R-11 -~----. 2nd Floor Office 13 Wall None 228 0.709 270 90 X 7'"·Cone 2nd Floor Office 14 Roof Wood. 1,745 0.051 270 0 .x .R-19 Roof(R.:19.2x8.16) 2nd Floor Office -. FENESTRATION SURFACES ' - · Site Assembled Giazi ec ox I u1 ~~WJJS >= , sq o an >= , ~_g ve ,ca g azmg en i:,.11,.u Neg~ 1nn. ,,.,.,..,.r1.,.,.,. ~nti ~uhmit NCgf' I "'half' . ,~ c,.rm 6g] Ch k b ·t B "Id" 100 000 ft f CFA d 10 000 ft rr I I . th NFRC # Type Area U-Fac. Act.Azm. SHGC . Glazing Type Location I Comments 1' Vi/indow· -.. 32 1.·130 0 0:44 'Grevlt 14 Storaae # 1/Entrv 2. Window 32 1.130 180 _ 0.44 Grevlt 14 Storaae # 1/Entrv 3 Window 60 1.130 270 0.44 Grevlt 14 Storaae # 1/Entrv 4 Window · 100 . 1:130 270 0.44 Greylt 14 Storaae # 1/Entrv 5 Window 60 1.130 270 0.44 Greylt 14. 1st Floor Storaae 6 Window 50 1.130 27.0 0.44 Greylt 14 12nd Floor Disolay 7 Window ,60 1.130 · 270 0.44 Greyft 14 12nd Floor Office . ,. .. ~· ' ' • •>, • •r~, ~: ,.., __ . . ~ -' .. .. ~ -. ~ ., . ~ .. ' .. .,, .. , ... EXTERIOR SHADING Window Overhang Left Fin Right Fin # Exterior Shade Type SHGC Hgt. Wd. . Len. Mnt. LEv+.REv+. Dist. Len. Hnt . Dist. Len. Hat. 1 · None 0.76 2 None 0:76 3 None 0.76 4 None 0.76 8.0 12.5 . 5.0 0.1 5.0 5.0. 5 None 0.76 6 None 0.76 7 None 0.76 I ,·. ~un In",;_~: .. ,; Time· ;,-;;-:';-;::--; 1'2'.37110 ~,m r.nrfo• 101--, .. 11-- EnergyPro 3.1 By EnergySoft Us~r Number: 1712 Job Number. NR1-31 Page:6 of 21 -[ !LIGHTING COMPLIANCE SUMMARY Part 1 of 2 L TG-1 I ~ Life Medical /PROJECT NAME . INSTALLED LIGHTING SCHEDULE LOMINAIRE Code DESCRIPTION #3 1(3) 4 ft Fluorescent TS Elec #3a (2) 4 ft fluorescent TS Elec #5 1(2) 4 ft Fluorescent TS.Elec #6 1(2) 4 ft Fluorescent TS·Elec #7 1(2) 4 ft Fluorescent TS Elec #8 (2) 4 ft Fluorescent TS Elec . .. Ughtin_g Schedule on Plans Snow Exterior Lighting Meets 0 Efficacy and Control Requirement of •30(c) 0 Control Requirements pf !131(f) !MANDATORY. AUTOMATIC .CONTROLS CONTROL LOCATION (Room#) !CONTROLS FOR CREDIT CONTROL LOCATION (Room # or Dwg. #) EnergyPro 3.1 CONTROL !DENTIFICATION CONTROL IDENTIFICATION LAMPS TYPE Watts DESCRIPTION # Per Lamp F32T8 3 32 F32T8 ? 32 -------- F32T8 2 32 F32T8 2 32 F-=t?T8 2 32 F32T8 ? 32 CONTROL TYPE /DATE 2/2/02 BALLASTS Luminaire (Lamp + Ballast) DESCRIPTION # # Watts Electronic 2.0 30 94.0 Electronic 1.0 2 62.0 Electronic 1.0 2 62.0 Electronic 1.0 20 62.0 Electronic 1.0 3 62.0 Electronic 1.0 2 62.0 ' Subtotal from this Page Total Portable Lighting (From L TG-1) Less _Control Credit Watts (From L TG-3) Adjusted Actual Watts Total Watts 2820 124 124 1 240 186 124 4,618/ 4,6181 3491 ol iNeTE-'TG' (Auto Ti.me Switch, Exterior, etc.) SPACE CONTROLLED ~:~i~gp1f: CONTROL TYPE (Occupant, Daylight, Dimming, etc.) Page:7 of21 ,,.: ~~! \-, AO • ILtGHTING_c-oMPLIANCE SUMMARY_ Part 2 of 2 LTG-11 I PROJECT NAME I DATE · . Life Medical 2/2/02 ITABLE 1A • PORTABLE LIGHTING NOT SHOWN ON PLANS FOR OFFICE AREAS >250 SQUARE FEET ROOM# DEFAULT AREA TOTAL WATTS ORZONEID CW/saft\. lSFl lBXC) 2nd Floor Office _ 0.2 1,745 349 TOTAL 1,745 349 IT ABLE 1 B • PORTABLE LIGHTING SHOWN ON .PLANS FOR OFFICE AREAS >250. SQUARE FEET 0· [~]-.. @J@l~ 0 @] . LUMIN. TASK # OF ROOM# PORTABLE LIGHTING # OF WATTS PER AREA TASK OR·ZONE ID FIXT FIXTURE (SF) AREAS DesciiDtlon X X TOTAL TOTAL AREA (SF) WATTS (D E) (C E) .. .. TOTAL 0 0 iTABLE 1C • PLANS SHOW PORTABLE LIGHTING IS NOT REQUIRED FOR OFFICE AREAS> 250 SQUARE FEET ROOM'# TOTAL AREA OR ZONE ID (SF) Designer needs to provide detailed documentation that the lightin ti level provided by the overhead lighting meets the needs of the space. The details include luminaire types, CU, and mounting locations relative to work areas • . -.·-:-1 , . ... • .. - TOTAL 0 IBUILDING SUMMARY-PORTABLE LIGHTING I BUILDING SUMMARY . TOTAL AREA {SF~ (FROM TABLES 1A+1 +1 C) TOTAL WATTS (FROM TABLES 1A+1B) BUILDING TOTAL 1 745 349 I Run lniti:a+ion Time: 02/02/02 12:37:10 Run Code: 1012682230 I -EnergyPro 3.1 By EnergySoft User Number: 1712 Job Number: NR1-31 Page:B of21 ICERTI.FICATE OF COMPLIANCE Performance MECH-11 PROJECT NAME Life Medical 2/2/02 !SYSTEM FEATURES MECHANICAL SYSTEMS j ~s_Y_s_TE_M_N_A_M~E ________ _,l~ __ D_H_W_H_ea~t~er __ ~ Packaged HP 1 Packaged HP 2 & 3 ... TIME CONTROL n/a Programmable Switch Programmable Switch ' SETBACK. CONTROL n/a No Setback Required No Setback Reauired ISOLATION ZONES n/a n/a nla HEAT PUMP THERMOSTAT? n/a Yes Yes ELECTRIC HEA,:? n/a 0.pkW 0.0kW FAN CONTROL .. n/a Constant Volume Constant Volume VAV MINIMUM POSITION CONTROL? n/a No No SIMULTANEOUS HEAT/COOL? n/a No No HEATING SUPPLY RESET n/a Constant Temc Constant Temc COOLING SUPPLY RESET n/a Constant temp Constant Temp HEAT REJECTION. CONTROL n/a n/a n/a VENTILATION n/a Outside Air Cert. Outside Air Cert. OUTDOOR DAMPER CONTROL n/a Auto Auto ECONOMIZER TYPE n/a No Economizer No Economizer DESIGN AIR CFM (MECH-3, COLUMN. I) n/a 190 cfm 270 cfm HEATING EQUIPMENT TYPE Electric Res : Heat Pump Heat Pump HEATING EQUIPMENT EFFICIENCY 100% 6.80 HSPF 6.80 HSPF -. COOLING EQUIPMENT TYPE AO SMITH PEC-030 Packaaed DX Packaged DX COOLING EQUIPMENT EFFICIENCY n/a 10.2 SEER/ 9.6 EER 10.2 SEER/ 9.6 EER MAKE AND MODEL NUMBER ' n/a RHEEM RJKA-A036. RHEEM RJKA-A036. HEATING DUCT LOCATION .R-VALUE n/a ·nta Ducts in Attic 4.2 Ducts in Attic 4.2 COOLING DUCT LOCATION R-VALUE n/a n/a Ducts in Attic 4.2 Ducts in Attic 4.2 PIPE/DUCT INSULATION PROTECTED'.? Yes Yes Yes PIPE TYPE (SUPPLY, ~ETURN, ETC.) SupplyHW PIPE INSULATION ~!;QUIRED? Yes Yes· -Yes VERIFIED SEALED DUCTS IN CEILING/ROOF SPACE n/a No No CODE TABLES: Enter code from table below into columns above • HEAT, PUMP .THERMOSTAT? . TIME CONTROL SETBACK CTRL. ISOLATION ZONES FAN CONTROL ELECTRIC HEAT? S: Prog. Switch -H: Heating Enter Number of I: Inlet Vanes O: Occupancy C: Cooling Isolation Zones. P: Variable Pitch VAVMINIMUM POSITION CONTROL? Sensor B: Both V:VFD SIMULTANEOUS HEAT/ COOL? Y:Yes M: Manual Timer O: Other C: Curve N:No HEAT AND COOL SUPPLY RESET? VENTILATION OUTDOOR DAMPER ECONOMIZER O.A.CFM HIGH El:FICIENCY? B: Air Balance A: Auto A:Air Enter Outdoor Air PIPE INSULATION REQUll~ED? C: Outside Air Cert. G: Gravity : Water CFM. M: Out Air Measure N: Not Required Note: This shall be no PIPE/DUCT INSULATION PROTECTED? D: Demand Control EC: Economizer less than Col. H on SEALED DUCTS IN CEILING/ROOF SPACE? N: Natural Control See Section MECH-3. 144 e 3 EnergyPro 3.1 Page:9 of 21 ICERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE Performance MECH-11 I PROJECT NAME · Life Medical 2/2/02 !SYSTEM FEATURES . ISYSTEM NAME Packaged HP 4 MECHANICAL SYSTEMS Packaged HP 5 & q TIME CONTROL Programma.ble Switch Programmable Switch SETBACK CONTROL No Setback Reauired No Setback Reauired ISOLATION ZONES nla nla HEAT PUMP THERMOSTAT? Yes Yes ELECTRIC HEAT? 0.0kW 0.0kW FAN CONTROL Constant-Volume ConstarifVolume. VAV MINIMUM POSITION CONTROL? No No · SIMULTANEOUS HEAT/COOL? No . No HEATING SUPPLY RESET Constant Temo Constant Temo COOLING SUPPLY.RESET Constant Temp Constant Temp HEAT REJECTION CONTROL nla n/a VENTILATION ·" ,·, 'Air Balan:ce · Air Balance OUTDOOR DAMPER CONTROL Auto Auto ECONOMIZER TYPE No Economizer No Economizer . DESIGN.AIR CFM (MECH-3, COLUMN I\ 272 cfm 262cfm HEATING EQUIPMENT TYPE Heat Pump HeatPump HEATING EQUIPMENT EFFICIENCY 6.80HSPF 6.80HSPF COOLING EQUIPMENT TYPE Packaaed DX Packaged DX COOLING EQUIPMENT EFFICIENCY 10.2 SEER /9.6 EER 10.2 SEER/ 9.6 EER MAKE AND MODEL NUMBER , RHEEM RJKA-A036. RHEEM-RJKA-A036. HEATING DUCT LOCATION . R-VALUE Ducts in Attic .:4,2 Ducts in Attic 4.2 COOLING DUCT LOCATION R-VALUE . Ducts in Attic 4.2· Ducts· in Attic 4.2 , PIPE/DUCT INSULATION PROTECTED? Yes Yes PIPE TYPE (SUPPLY, RETURN, ETC.) PIPE INSULATION.REQUIRED? Yes Yes VERIFIED SEALED DUCTS IN CEILING/ROOF SPACE . No No CODE TABLES: Enter code from table l>elow Into columns above; HEAT.PUMP THERMOSTAT? · TIME CONTROL SETBACK.CTRL. ISOLATION ZONES FAN CONTROL ELECTRIC HEAT? S: Prog. Switch H: Heating Enter Number of I: Inlet Vanes . O:·Occupancy . C: Cooling Isolation Zones • P: Variable Pitch VAV MINIMUM POSITION CONTROL? Sensor B:·eoth V:VFD SIMULTANEOUS HEAT/ COOL? Y:Yes M: Manual Timer 0: Other C: Curve HEAT AND COOL SUPPLY RESET? N:No VENTILATION OUTDOOR DAMPER ECONOMIZER O.A.CFM HIGH EFFICIENCY? B: Air Balance A:Auto :Air Enter Outdoor Air PIPE INSULATION REQUIRED? C: Outside Air Ceit. G: Gravity :Water CFM. M: Out Air Measure N: Not Required Note: This shall be no PIPE/DUCT INSULATION PROTECTED? D: Demand Control EC: Economizer less than Col. H on N: Natural Control See Section MECH-3. 144 e 3. EnergyPro 3.1· Page: 1 O of 21 INIECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SUMMARY. Part 1 of 2 MECH-21 · !PROJECT NAME . - Life Medical IDATE 2/2/02 I r.t-m I FR ANClTOWER ~IIIUIIUl'\RY PUMPS Tot. Motor Drive Pump Equipment Name Equipment Type Qty,_ Efficiency Tons Qty GPM BHP Eff. Eff. Control --- ,- DHW / BOILER ~,, .... ",RY Energy Factor Standby TANKINSUL. Rated Vol. or Recovery Loss or Ext. System Name ·System Type Oistribution Type Qty Input-_ (Gals.) Efficiency Pilot R-Val. AO SMITH PEC-030 . Storage Elec. Standard 1 15,359 28 0.91 n/a n/a CENTRAL SYSTEM RATINGS --' HEATING COOLING I -~•--".~~",•,,• ' .. -, ··~ , .. ,t;-' ....... "'':~ .,_. "·1-Aux. -· --·' Svstem Name . Svstem Tvoe Qtv. Outout kW Eff. Outout.· Sensible Efficiencv Economizer Type RHEEM RJKA-A036. Packaged DX 6 37,000 0.0 6.80HSPF 36,000 25,200 10.2 SEER/ 9.6 EER No Economizer -,- -' CENTRAL SYSTEM FAN SUMMARY - ~IIPPLYFAN RETURN FAN --Motor Drive Motor Drive Svstem Name Fan Tvoe Motor Location CFM BHP. Eff. Eff. CFM BHP Eff. Eff. RHEEM RJKA-A036. Constant Volume Blow-Throµgh 1;200 0.33 77.0% 100.0% none - 7 Run Code: 1012682230 EnergyPro 3.1 By EnergySon Job Number. NR1-31 Page:11 of21 " ' . !MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SUMMARY Part 2 of 2 PROJECT NAME IDATE Life Medical.. .... -~ ., .. ZONE TERMINAL SUMMARY VAV TERMINAL BOX TEDUlfllAI S::AN Min. CFM· _0aha .. +·c ... n ,Motor Drive 7ftna )U,.,...,. Svstem TvDa Otv, Ratio Tvoe DeltaT. CFM BHP Eff. Eff, .- C . . ... .. I •,o •: .. ~ d A;J..-,~..,.. .. ' . .,~. ,, .... ,.....,. t'J ~ • 4~ •• ,. .... . .. ,.. .. EXHAUST FAN SUMMARY . ' EXHAU n FAN . EXHAUST FAN Motor Drive Motor Room Name Qty. CFM BHP Eff. Eff. Room Name Qty. CFM BHP Eff. Hall/RR 2 6( 0.05 77.0o/c 97.0% Hall/RR 2 6( 0.05 77:0o/c 97.0¾ ~- Run Initiation Time: n?/n?/1'12 12:37'.10 Run CnrfA: 1012f;R22~n EnergyPro .3. 1. By EnergySoft User Number: 1712 Job Number: NR1-31 MECH-21 2/2/02. .... --D Type Output .·. Drive Eff. Page:12 of 21 ., ~ .IMECHANICAL VENTILATION MECH-31 !PROJECT NAME Life Medical I DATE . 2/2/02 I MECHANICAL VENTILATION [il w Q] -AREA BASIS OCCUPANCY BASIS. REQ'D DESIGN COND. MIN. NO. CFM. MIN. O.A. OUTDOOF VAV !TRANS ZONE/SYSTEM AREA CFM CFM OF PER CFM (MAX OF AIR MIN. FER (SF) PER SF (B xC) PEOPLE PERSON (ExF) DORG) CFM RATIO AIR ,- Storage# 1/Entry 470 0,15 70 1.-<l 50.0 70 70 70 ,- Hall 158 0.1§ 24. 1.E 15.0 24 24 120 -Packaged _HP_ 1 Total 94 190 - 1st Floor Storage _ 1,802 0.15 270 5.4 50.0 270 270 270 - Packaged HP 2_& 3 · Total 270 270 - Hall/RR 124 0.15 19 q 15.0 19 19 120 - 2nd Floor Oisplay . 606 0.25 152 20.0 7.6 152 152 152 ..___ Packaged'HP 4 Total 170 272 - 2n9 Floe>r Office 1,745 0.15 262 17.!i 15.Q 2q? 262 262 ..___ Packaged HP 5 & 6 Total 262 262 --, .... . -., - - - - -.. - - -I - ..___ ,- .. ~ - - ..___ -. - rn Minimum Ventilation Rate per Section 121, Table 1-F. Based on Expected Number of Occupants or at least 50% of Chapter 101997 UBC Occupant-Density. Must be greater than or equal to H, or use Transfer Air. Design Outdoor Air includes ventilation from Supply Air System & Room Exhaust Fans. Must be greater than or equal to (H minus I), and, for VAV, greaterthan or equal to (H-J). EnergyPro 3.1 By.EnergySoft l,Jser Number: 17~2 Job.Number: NR1-31 Page: 13 of 21 J ' !ENVELOPE MA.NDATORY MEASURES rROJECT NAME. . Life Medical DESCRIPTION 00 § 118(a). lnstallecf Insulating Materlal~hall have been certified by·the manufacturer to comply with the California Quality Standards f~r insulating material, Title 20, Chapter·4, Article 3. ·00 § 118(c) All lns1,1lating Material, shall be installed in compliance with the flame spread rating and smoke density requirements of Sections 2602 and 707 of Title 24, Part 2. [Z] § 117(a) All Exterior Joints and openings in the building that are observable sources of air leakage shall be caulked, gasketed, weatherstripped or otherwise sealed. [X] § 116(b) Site Constructed Doo~, Windows and Skylights shall be-caulked between the 11nit and the building, ·and.shall be weatherstripped (except for unframed glass doors and fire doors). [Z] § 116(a)1 Manufactured•Doors and.Windows installed·shall have air Infiltration rates not exceeding those shown in Table Number 1-E. of the Standard.s. Manufactured fenestration products must be labeled for U-yalue:according to NFRC procedures. . .. ~ . . . . . 00 § 1.18(e) Demising Walls,in Nonresidential Buildings: The opaque portions of framed demising walls In nonresidential buildings shall have .insulation with an installed R-value of no less than R-11 between framlng·members: - .. , ... . .. , .. Energyf>ro 3.1 By EnergySoft User Number: 1712 Jop Number: NR1-31 ENV-MMI I DATE . 2/2/02 Designer Enforcement Page: 14 of 21 ,t. ' l !LIGHTING :MANDATORY MEASURES /PROJECT NAME , . . tife Medical DESCRIPTION D § 131(d)1 For every floor, all interior lighting systems shall be equipped with a separate automatic control tQ shut off the lighting. This automatic control shall meet the requirements-of ·Section 119 and may be an occupancy sensor, automatic time switch, or other device capable ohutomatlcally shutting off the lighting. D .§ 131(d)2Overrlde for Building Lighting Shut-off: The automatic building ·shut-off system is provided with a manual, accessible override switch In sight of the lights. The area of override Is not to exceed 5,000 square feet. [X] § 119(h) Automatic Contro..Oevices Certified: All automatic conirol devices specified are certified, all alternate equipment shall be certified and installed as directed by the manufacturer. [X] Fluorescent Ballast and Luminaires.Certlfied: All fluorescent fixtures specified for, the project are.certified and listed In the Directory. All installed fixtures shall be certified. [X] § 132 Tandem Wiring for One and Three Lamp Fluorescent Fixtures: All one and three lamp fluorescent fixtures are tandeµ, wired with two lamp ballasts where required by Standards Section 132; or all three lamp fluorescent fixtures are specified with electronic high-frequency ballasts and are exempt from tandem wiring requirements. [X] § 131(a) 'Individual Room/Area Controls: Each room and area In this building Is equipped with a.separate switch or occupancy sensor device for each area with·floor-to-ceiiing walls. [X] § 131(b) Uniform Red!,lctlon for Individual Rooms: Ali rooms and areas greater than 100 square feet and more than 0.8 watts per square foot of ligh~ing load shall be controlled with bl-level switching for uniform reduction of lighting within the room. [X] § 131(c) Daylight Area Control: All rooms with windows and skylights that are greater than 250 square feet and that allow for the effective use of daylight In the area shall have 50% of the lamps In each dayllt area controlled by a separate switch; or the effective ·use of daylight cannot be accomplished because the windows are continuously shaded by a bulldlng on the adjacent lot. Diagram of shading during different times of the year is included on plans. D § 131(f) Control of Exterior Lights: Exterior mounted fixtures served from the electrical panel Inside the building are controlled with a directional ph9to cell control on the roof and a-corresponding relay In.the electrical panel. D § 131(e) Display Ll~htlng. Display lighting shall be separately switched on clrc11lts that are 20 amps or less. . .. EnergyPro 3.1 By EnergySoft User Number: 1712 Job Number: NR1-31 LTG-MMI I DATE . 2/2/02 . I Designer Enforcement Page: 15 of 21 !MECHANICAL MANDATORY MEASURES IPROjECT NAME -. Life Medical DESCRIPTION Eq ... ipment and Systems Efficiencies IX] § 111 Any appliance for which. there Is a California standard established in the Appliance D § 115(a> [ZJ §123 Efficiency Regulations wlll,comply with the c1pplicable standard •. Fan ~pe central fumac!3S shall not have a pilot light. Piping, except that conveying fluids at temperatures between 60 and 105 degrees Fahrenheit, or within HVAC equipment, shall be Insulated In.accordance with Standards Section 123. [ZJ § 124 Air handling duct systems shall be Installed and ·Insulated in compliance with Sections 601, 603 and 604 of the Unifoi:m Mech11nical Code. ContrQls § 122(e)· Each space.conditioning system shall be Installed with oite of the following: · D § 122(e)1A Each space conditioning system serving bulldlng types sucll as offlies and manufacturing facilities (and all others not.explicitly exempt from the requirements of Section 112 (d))·shall be Installed with an automatic;: time switch with an accessible manual override th.at allows operation-of the system during off-hours for up to 4 hours. The time ·switch shall0be capable of programming different schedules for weekdays and weekends; incorporate an.automatic holiday·''shut- off' feature that turns.off all loads for at least 24 hours, then resumes the normally scheduled operation; and has program backup capabilities that prevent the loss of the device's program and time setting for at least 10 hours if power Is lnterruptec:I; or D § 122(e)1B An occupancy sensor to control the operating perlod·ofthe system; or D § 122(e)1C. A 4-hour timer that can be manually operated to control the operating period of the system. § 122(e)2 Each space conditioning ~ystem shall be installed with controls that temporarily restart and temporarily operate the system as required to.maintain II setback heating and/or a.setup cooling.thermostat setpolht. D § 122(g) Each space c.onl;lltionlng system serving multiple zones with a combined conditioned floor area more than 25,000 square feet shall be provided with isolation zones. Each zone: shall not.exceed 25,000 square feet; shall be provided with Isolation devices, such as valves or·dampers, that allow the supply of heating or cooling to be setback or shut off Independently of other isolc1tion areas; and shall be controlled by a time control device as described above. § 122(a&b) Each space conditioning.system sh11II be controlled by an lndivic:lual thermostat that respo11ds to.temperature within the zone. Where used to control heating, the control shall be adjustable down to 55 degrees F or lower. For cooling, the control shall be adjustable up to85 degrees.For higher. Where used for·both heating and cooling, the·control shall be capable-of providing a deadband of at least 5 degrees F within which the supply of heating and cooling is shut off or reduc;:ed to a minimum. § 122(c) Thermostats shall have. numeric setpolnts In degrees Fahrenheit (F) and adjustable setpolnt stops_ a_ccesslble only to authorized. personnel. § 112(b) Heat pumps shall be Installed with controls to prevent electric resistance supplementary heater operation when the heating lpad can be met by the heat pumpc1lone. EnergyPro 3.1 By EriergySoft User Number: 171_2 Job Number: NR1-31 Part 1 of 2 MECH-MMI I DATE . 2/2/02 Designer Enforcement Page:16 of 21 IMECHANICAL. MANDATORY MEASURES Part 2 of 2 MECH-MMI !PROJECT NAME . , . Life Medical I DATE . 2/2/02 Description Designer Enforcement Ventilation 00 § 121(e) Controls shall be provided to allow outside air dampers or devices to be operated at the ventilation rates as specified on these plans. D § 122(f) Gravity or automatic dampers interlocked and closed on fan shutdown.shall be provided on the outside air intakes and discharges of all space conditioning and exhaust systems. D § ,122(f) · All. gravity ventilating systems shall. be provided with automatic or readily accessible manually operated dampers In all openings to the outside, except for combustion air openings. D § 121(f)1 Air Balancing: The system shall be balanced.in ;sccordance with the National Environmental Balaiiclng Bureli!,I (NEBB) Procedural Standards (1983), or " Associated Air Balance Council (AABC) National Standards (1989); or 00 § 121(1)2 Outside Air Certification: The system shall provide the minimum outside air as shown on the mechanical drawings, and shaH be measured-and certified by the Installing licensed C-20 mechanical contractor and certified by (1) the design mechanical engineer, (2) the Installing llcenced C-20 mechanical contractor, or (3) the person with overall responsibility. for the design of the ventilation system; or D § 121(f)3 Outside Air Measurement: The system.shall be equipped with a calibrated local or remote device capable of measuring the quantity of outsitte air on ·a continuous basis and displaying that quantity on a readily accessible display dlvice; or D § 12f(f)4 Another method approved by the·Commission. · Serv{ce Water·Heating Sy~tems D § 113(b)2 If a circulating hot water system is Installed, 1i shall have a control capable of automatically turning off the circulating pump(s) when l'!ot water is notrequired. D § 113(t>)3B Lavatories In restrooms of publlc facilities shall be equipped with controls to limit the outlet temperature to 11 O degrees F. D § 113(b)3C Lavatories in restrooms of public facilities shall be equipped.with one of the following: Outlet devices that limit the flow of hot water to a maximum-of 0.5 gallons per minute. Foot a¢tuated control valves, and outlet devices that.limit the flow of ,hot water to a maximum of 0.75 gallons per minute. Proximity sensor-actuated control valves, and outlet devices that limit the flow of hot water to a maxlmun,.of 0.75 gallons per minute. Self-closing valves, and outlet devices that limit the flow of hot water to a maximum of 2.5 gal.Ions per minute, and 0.25 gallons/cycle (circulating system). Self-closing valves, and outlet devices that limit the flow of hot-water to a maximum of 2.5 gallons per minute, and 0.50 gallons/cycle (non-circulating system). ' . '" · Self-<;losinlrvalves, atrd 6utlefdelilces that llmlt the flow of hot water to a maximum of 2,5 gallons per minute, and 0.75 gallons/cycle (foot switches and proximity sensor controls). EnergyPro 3.1 By EnergySoft User Number. 1712 Job Number. NR1-31 Page: 17 of 21 • IHVAC SYSTEM HEATING .AND .COOLING LOADS SUMMARY PROJECT NAME DATE Life. Medical 2/2/02 -SYSTEM NAME FLOORAREA Packaaed HP 1 628 ENGINEERING CHECKS SYSTEM LOAD /Number of S~ste~s -. I 11 COIL COOLING PEAK COIL HTG. PEAK Heating System CFM Sensible Latent CFM Sensible Output per System 37,000 · . Total Room Loads 980 18,417 2,035 1,718 26,496 Total Output (Btuh). 37,000 Return Vented Lighting 0 Output (Btuh/sqft) 58.9 Return Air Ducts 921 1,325 Cooling $ystem Return Fan 0 0 Outp!Jt per System 36,000 Ventilation I · 190 1,497 1,8421 190 7,184 Total Output (Btuh) 36,000 Supply Fan 0 0 Total Output (Tons) 3.0 Supply Air Ducts 921 1,325 .. Total Output (Btuh/sqft) 57.3 TOTAL SYSTEM LOAD I 21,7561 3,8771 I 36,3301 Total Output (sqft/Ton) 209.3 Air System HVAC EQUIPMENT SELECTION CFM per System 1,200 · .. ia . RHEEM RJKA-A036'. 25,890 10,170 Airflow (cfm) 1,200 · Airflow (cfin/sqft) 1.91 . ·• Airflow (cfm/Ton) 400.0 .. Total Adjusted System Output J 25,8901 10,1101 I 28,3451 Outside Air(%) 15.9 (Adjust~ for Peak.Design Conditions) Outside Air (cfm/sqft) 0:30 TIME OF SYSTEM PEAK I Jul 5pml I Jan 12 aml Note: values above given at ARI· conditions HEATING SYSTEM PSYCHROMETRICS (Airstream Temoeratures at Time.of Heatina Peak 34.0 OF 63.4 OF 63.4 °F . 85.3°F .. _, ... .. . . ~h Supply Air Ducts g ~ , ,-r , Outside Air 190 cfm ) ( 84.3°F Supply Fan Heating Coil " 1200 cfm I ROOMS! 69.0 °F 70.0°F ., . I ,; _, -h . Return P.ir Ducts 9~ ... ,-... . " .. COOLING SYSTEM PSYCHROMETRICS lAirstream Temoeratures. at Time of Coolina Peak) 82:0 / 67.5 of 75.9 / 63.0 OF 75,9 / 63.0 OF 55.9·./ 54.7 OF ~h Supply Air Ducts g ~ .. .. _, ... . .. r , , r Outside Air 190 ctni )' Supply Fan 56.6 / 54.9 OF · ·Cooling <;:oil ''\ 1200 cfm 50.7% R.H. I ROOMS! 74.7 i62.2 OF 74.0/61.9 °F ,; _, -'b Return Air_ Ducts 9E I ... ,-... EnergyPro 3.1 By EnergySoft User Number: 1712 Job Number: NR1-31 Page:18 of 21 J• : IHVAC SYSTEM HEATING AND COOLING LOADS SUMMARY PROJ!=CT NAME DATE J.Jfe Medical 2/2/02 --SYSTEM NAME FLOOR AREA Packaaed HP 2 & 3 " 1,802 . ENGINEERING -CHECKS SYSTEM. LOAD - I Number of Sy~tems I 2! COIL COOLING PEAK COIL HTG. PEAK Heating ~y~telJl Ci=M Sensible Latent CFM Sensible Output per System 37,000 Total Room Loads 973 18,859 5,654 1,462 26,605 Total Output (Btuh) 74,000 · ·-Return·Vented Lighting 0 Output (Btulilsqft) 4U Return Air Ducts 943 1,330 Cooling System Return Fan 0 0 Output per System _ 36,000 Ventilation 270 2,428 2,495 270 10,342 Total Output(Btuh) 72,000 Supply Fan 0 0 ... Total Output (Tons) 6.0 Supply Air Ducts 943 1,330 Total Output JBtuh/sqft) 40.0 TOTAL SYSTEM LOAD I 23,19j 8,1491 I 39,6081 Total Output (sqft/Ton) 300.3 Air System HVAC EQUIPMENT SELECTION .. CFM per SystElm 1,200 ~ Airflow (cfm) 2,400 RHEEM RJKA-A036. 50,866 20,773 Airflow (cfm/sqft) 1.33 Airflow (cfm/Ton) 400.0 Outside Air (%) 11.3 Total Adjusted System Output I 50,8661 20,7731 I 56,6901 (AdjustecUor Peak Design Conditions) Outside Air (cfm/sqft) 0.15 TIME OF SYSTEM PEAK I Jul 4pml I Jan 12aml Note: values above give~ at ARI cond!tions HEATING SYSTEM PSYCHROMETRICS (Airstream Temoeratures at Time of Heatina Peak\ 34.0°F 65:5°F 65.5°F 87.4 OF ~h Supply Air Ducts g • .... J .. .. ,. ,., , ~ ,. Outside Air 270·cfm if 86.9°F Supply Fan Heating Coil '~ 2400cfm I ROOMS I 69.5 °F 70.0°F I -J -.. h Retum Air Ducts 9E ,· ,., " .. -.. COOLING SYSTEM PSYCHROMETRICS (Airstream Temoeratures at Time -of Coolina Peak) 82.7 / 67.7 OF 75.3 / 62.8 °F . 75.3 / 62:8 °F 55. 7 / 54,5 OF ~h Supply Air Ducts g • .. J ... .... ,. . ~ , ,. Outside Air 210 ctm )' Supply Fan · Cooling Coil 56.0 / 54.6 °F ''\ 2400 cfm 51.2% R.H. I ROOMSI 74.4 / 62.2 OF 74.0 I 62.1 °F .,, J -h Return Air Ducts 9E I ' ~ ' . .__I __ E_ne-'rg=-y_Pr_o_3._1 _B..,_y-'En....;e.:,::rg<..:yS:.:..oft:.:..·_~_.=.:Us:.:..erc..:.N:.:.um....:.be:.:.r::.:... ·:.:..17'-'-12=--_____ J:.c:o.::..b:.:.:Nu....:.m:.:..be:.:.:r:....:.N:.:.R:.:..1--=-31'---------~--'-P-"'ag"-'-e·'-.19_o'--f2_1__, ·: IHVAC SYSTEM HEATING AND COOLING LOADS SUMMARY PROJECT NAME DATE Life Medical 2/2/02 SYSTEM NAME FLOORARl;A Packaaed HP 4 730 ENGINEERING CHECKS ISYSTEM LOAD !Number of S~stems ·1 · 11 COIL COOLING PEAK COIL HTG. PEAK Heati!lg System CFM ~ensible Latent CFM Sensible Output per Sy~tem 37,000. Total Room Loads 1,508 24,803 5,539 1,861 24,271 Total Output (Btuh) 37,000 Return Vented Lighting 0 Output (Btuh/sqft) 59.1 Return Air Ducts 1,240 1,214 .. Cooling System Return Fan 0 0 Output per System 36,0()0 Ventilation .272 2,265 860 272 10,264 Total Output (Btuh) 36,000 Supply Fan· 0 0 Total Output (Tons) 3.0. . Supply Air Ducts 1,240 1,214 Total Output (Btuh/sqft) 49.3 TOTAL SYSTEM LOAD · i 29,5591 6,3991 r 36,9631 Total Output(sqft/Ton) 243.3 Air System HVAC EQUIPMENT SELECTION CFM per System 1,200 ~ Airflow (cfm) 1,200. RH.EEMRJKA-A036. 24,490 12,575 Airflow (cfm/sgft) 1.64 Airflow (cfmlto_n) 400.0 Outside Air(%) 22.6. Total Adjusted System Output \ 24,4901 12,5751 I 28,3451 (Adjusted for Peak Design Conditions) Outside Air (cfm/sqft) 0.37 TIME OF SYSTEM PEAK I Jul 4 pml I Jan 12aml Note: values above given at ARI conditions HEATING SYSTEM PSYCHROMETRICS tAirstream Temoeratures atTime of Heatino Peak 34.0°F 61.1°F 61.1°F 83.0°F Supply Air Ducts g ~ .. J .. .. ~h ·, ,-r ., Outside Air •. 272cfm )' 82.1°F Supply Fan Heating-Coil ,\ 1·200 cfm I ROOMS I 69.1°F 70.0°F i ..i i h Return Air Ducts 9E I , ,-, . COOLING SYSTEM PSYCHROMETRICS tAirstream Temoeratures at Time of Coolina Peak) 82.7 /67.7°F 76.7 /65.0°F 76.7 /65.0°F 57.8/ 56.7 OF Supply Air Ducts g ~ .. -~ ... .. ~h r ,-, , Outside Air 272 cfm /' Supply Fan 58.7 /57.1°F Cooling Coil ,\ 1400cfm · 58.1% R.H. I ROOMSI 75_.0 / 64.2 OF · 74.0/63.9°F ,; ..i -h Return,Air Ducts 9E I , ,-. ''. EnergyPro 3.1 By EnergySoft ... l.i~r Number: 1712 ...... , _,' .. Job Num~r:: .. N~1-;n . Page:20 of 21 ,. ! -•. : IHVAC SYSTEM'HEATING AND COOLING LOADS SUMMARY PROJECT NAM!: DATE Li,fe Medical 2/2/02 SYS.TEM NAME FLOORAREA Packaaed HP 5 & 6 .. 1,745 .. ENGINEERING CHECKS. . SYSTEM LOAD /Number of Systems I .2! COIL COOLING PEAK COIL HTG. PEAK Heating Sy~tem CFM Sensible Latent CFM Sensible O_utput per System 37,000 Total Room Loads 1,859 34,825 6,479 1,327 24,458 Total 0utIn~t (Btuh) 74,000 · -Return-Vented lighting 0 Output (Btuh/sqft) 42.4 Return Air Ducts 1,741 1,223 Cooling Sy~tem Return Fan 0 0 Output per.Sysiem 36;000 Ventilation 262 2,266 2,19 262 10,027 Total Output'(Btuh) 72,000 Supply Fan 0 0 Total Output (Tons) 6.0 Supply Air Ducts 1,741 1,223 Total Output (Btuh/sqft) 41.3 TOTAL SYST.EM LOAD I 40,5731 8,6691. I 36,9301 Total Output (sqft/Ton) 290.8 Air System HVAC EQUIPMENT SELECTION CFM per System 1,200 · .· ~ Airflow (cfm) 2,400 · RHEEM RJKA-A036. 50,698 21,287 Airflow (cfm/sqft) 1.38 Airflow (cfm/Ton) 400:0 Outside Air(%) 10.9 Total Adjusted System Output I (Adjusted tor Peak Design.Conditions) 50,6981 21,2871 I 56,6901 Outside Air (cfm/sqft) 0.15 · TIME OF SYSTEM PEAK I Jul 4pml I Jan 12aml ~ote: values above given at ARI C0!1dltlons HEATING SYSTEM PSYCHROMETRICS .(Airstream Temoeratures· at Time of Heatina Peak 34.0°F 65.7°F 65.7°F 87.6°F Supply Air Ducts q ~ ... _,, .. ... ~h , ,-r -,. Outside Air 262cfni" ... ) w' . ,. -87.1°F Supply Fan Heating Coil '~ 2400 cfm I ROOMS! 69.5 °F 70.0°F I ~ ~ ~ "h Return.Air Ducts 9~ ... r. ... COOLING SYSTEM PSYCHROMETRICS (Airstream Temoeratures at Time of Coolina Peak) .. 82.7 /67.7oF 75.5 / 63.1 OF 75.5 / 63.1°F 56.0 I 54.8 °F ~h Supply Air Ducts q -i, .. ., .. .. , ,-.,. ' , .. Outside Air 262 cfm j 56.6 / 55.1 °F ) Supply Fan · Cooling Coil '\ 2400 cfm 52.2% R.H. I ROOMS I 74.7 /62.6 OF 74.0 / 62.3 OF ~ _., . ~ .·h Return Air Ducts 9E I ... ,-... EnergyPro 3.1 By EnergySoft User Number: 1712 Job Number: NR1-31 Page:21 of 21 .. POOR . . ' -' . · ·QUALITY· t; i~ : ~ . . . r, . ' I, ' . · · O·RIGINAL S · FORM NO. Pll-736 HEATP RJMA-SERIES HlGH EFFICIENCY RJKA-SERIES STAN:DARD EFFICIENCY PACKAGE HEAT PUM'P EPA POLLUTION PREVENTER sc,1111 · Jnsiae ISO 9002 C"crfi_lit:•11: Nunihcr: 30!64 L------ Nominal Sizes 3 to 5 Tons [10.6 to 17.6 kW] '"CERTIFIED UNDER THE A.A.I. CERTIFICATION PROGRAM-A.A I STANDARD 240 .. -- • a:, ELECTRICAL AND PHYSICAL DATA PACKAGE HEAT PUMP-STANDARD EFFICIENCY ELECTRICAL PHYSICAL ~ ·No. . Phase . · . . · Afl!peres . , . 1~ mum Circuit . F.itter Outdoor Coil I Weight Model I Compressor Full load M" 1 Fuse or HACR . RJKA· Freqlien~y (H~) Rated Load Locked·Rotor . · (F.LA) Ctrcul_t · Breaker Qrlve RecommeRded R22 Voltage (Volts) A 1,----,-----1 Ampac,ty . . . Type No. and Size 1----------'-,---1 oz~ [gl mperes Amperes Fan Blower Amperes Mm1mum Maximum [mm x mm x mm] Area Sq. Ft. No. CFM [Ll 1 Net Ship (RLA) (LRA) Motor Motor Amperes Amperes [Sq. ml Rows s lbs. [kg] Lbs. [kg] A036CK I 3·60-208/230 I 13.0/13.0 77 3.0 4.0 24/24 30/30 35/35 DIR (f~; i lfs°/4bi\° 16.9 [1.570] 1.00 : 4000'[1888] 99 [2807] 480 [217.7] . 49~ [424.5] A036CL I 3-60-208/230 13.0/13.0 77 3.0 3.0 23/23 30/30 35/35 BLT (f~d: s2f5°/4bgjo 16.9 [1.570] 1.00 4000 [1888] 99 (2807] 480 [217.7] 495 [224.5) A036DL I .3-60-460 7.0/7.0 39 1.0 2.0 12/12 15 15 BLT . (f~J:lis°/4bgjo 16 .. 9 [1.570]. 1.00 4000 [1888] 99 [2807] 480 [217.7] 495.(224.5) A036JK I 1-60-208/230 19.0/19,0 100 3.0 4,0 31/31 40/40 45/45 DIR (f1d}lfs°x~b:i° 16.9 [1..570] 1.00 4000 [1888] 99 [2807] 480 (217.7] 495 [224.5] A036YL I 3-60-575 I 6.0/6.0 I 31 1.0 2.0 11/11 15 15 · BLT (f1J:~s°/4bi,o A042CK I · 3-60-208/230· I 15.0/15.0. I ...... 88· 3.01/4 . ; 1if6!'"': :':"""'?1sif -~::_/soi,;io. . 40/40 , DIR::.. (~)5.1_-xir].f'' ' . . :flt!;-:..?.._i~:~ ... ~~1:5.~$,·~~ ,,~::;:~,_1,t.-.;,'lt1 :. , ,:i :~~ ~. l2 -·.,:0 ·-·· ---, ... ..,,~.,,. · ,,,., .. ~%i,·,~··"$it''',"'· .,,,,,,, · (2ri·-1:~ A042CL I 3-60-208/230 15.0/15.0 ,{-88 ·-3.lf;~ ~t~~ . , · · ~It· it.~~@:. · 35/35 tft., [25 ~ ~ -----f-~--'--t--~~-... ="-~---!-''-,-;:."+;",'-'" "":cii'~.,F,· ~-~-r-'• ~.-1.~~.'(' . . • : . A042DL I · 3-60-460 · 8:0/8,0 .. < .. 44 1.o:} :: ·:~i~fe :·. · · ~J(i1 ~ID!~· . 20 -J,~\T. . (f.l"5-1:xf253 5 5J • l w•• 4 '(.l)tWl~ 'fl~ :l' 5:i~;;tA ~~A~r.71;"': • '/•:-f •" • 12 • • (,\j . . .. -, . "'·.'.W:i'"-r"':1 °'.,,· :.r,:~fyj ~1·•.,.-.,. ,'d';;,· (2) 11(25:0~j&., A042JK I 1-60-Q08/230 ?~-0/23.0 .... 121 3.0·,. 1:9:l~ ·t0 • §.,;~.,.., ~, M.,. 50~o · :,}JJlt. [25xtr3SIX::~' ,' . . •. . ..... ~. ,.. ,,',',i;;;,,;: ;li)i\\,_, /;l, . ,, ..• la,-~ • . • -".•J, A042YL I 3-60-575 '6 0/6 0 34 1 0 . :sfS?.~H,'!ffl'l{jj\i', ~-w,~r-:it . 15' '·'.;\ :~lirf (2) 1x.tM{>0![Q" . • • , . ' .: !., ', ·.'.~, "~['i2'G:iii\,~?, ,ti~;r,f~~;':· ., .. -. : .' ··~:~/ '.('(\;.~"" .: [25, X lia5;~_4®li:;. A048CK I 3-60-208/230 ,. 15.0/15.0 I 91 3.0 4.0 29/29 35/35 45/45 DIR (fiJ:~s°x~bti0 16.9(1:579] 1.00 4000[1888]. 128'[3629] 496(225.0) 511 [231.8] A048CL I 3-60-208/230 15.0/15.0 91 3:0 3.0 25/25 30/30 35/35 BLT (fid: iis°/4bijo 16.9 [1.570]_ 1.00 4000 [1888] 128 [3629] 496 [225.0] . 511 [231.8] A048DL .. 3-60-460' 8.0/8.0 46 1.0 2.0 13/13 15 20 BLT :(r1J;tfs°/4bii°' 16.9[1.570]. 1.00 4000(1888] .128(-3629]. 496(225.0] 511 [231.8] A048JK 1-60-208/230 26.0/26.0 131 3.0 4.0 40/40 50/50 60/60 DIR (f~d: iis°x ~6ijo 16.9 [1.570] 1.00 4000 [1888] 128 [3629] 496 [225:0] 511 [231.8] A048YL I 3-60-575 I 6.0/6.0 I 37 I 1.0 I 2.0 I 11/11 I 15 I 15 I BLT I (fiJ flfs°/4iti° 16.9 [1.570] 1.00 4000 [1888) 128 [3629) 496 [225.0] 511 [231.8]· A060CL I 3-60-208/230 I 21.0/21.0 I 123 I 3.0• I 3.0 I 34/34 I 40!4!) 50/50 BLT <riJ;lls°/4~~J) 16.9(1.570] 1.00 4000(1888}. 138[3912] 515:{~~~6] 530(240.4] ., A060DL I 3-60-460 I 11.0111.0 I 62 I a -I 2:0 1· 11111 I 20i20 25/25 BLT (fiJ: /ls°x~:i° 16.9 [1.570] 1.00 4000 [18ii8J 138 [39121 515 (233.6] 530 [240.4] A060JL I 1-60-208/230 I 35.0/35.0 I 169 I 3.0 I 4.0. I 51/51 60/60 60/60 BLT {r~J:J:s°x\6ii0 16.9(1.570] 1.00 4000[1888] 138[3912] 515(233.6] 530(240.4] A060YL 3-60-575 9.0/9.0 49 1.0 2.0 15/15 20 20 BLT <~J:lfs°x~6gi0 16.9(1.570] 1.00 4000(1888] 138(3912] 515(233.6] 530(240.4] ] Designates Metric Conversions ~ ' -..,, ~ 07-19-2002 Job Address: Permit Type: Parcel No: Valuation: Reference #: Project Title: Applicant: PACKARD GARTH 760 802-5107 Total f:ees: City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 Plan Check Revision Permit No: PCR02193 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 1932 KELLOGG AV CBAD PCR l,.ot #: 0 2121700400 $0.00 CB02-361 Construction Type: NEW LIFE MEDICAL SEVERAL REVISIONS Status: Applied: Entered· By: Plan Approved: Issued: Inspect Area: APPROVED 07/08/2002 MDP 07/19/2002 Owner: i693 07/19/02 0002 (il. $240.00 LIFE PROPERTIES L, L C 1930 KELLOGG AVE CARLSBAG CA 92008 Total Payments To Date: $0.00 Balance Due: $240.00 Plan Check Revision Fee Additional Fees $240.00 $0.00 '' FINAL APPROVAL lnsp~ctor: Date: ______ _ Clearance: NOTICE: Pleas~ !(Ike NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "lmposiiion" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as "fees/exactions." You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest-procedures set forth, in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition . . You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that yo~r right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other ~imilar application pro9essing or service fees in connection with this project. NOR DOES IT APPLY to any • : • • • · • • • • i r · i 'r JV; ,u .. 240,,00 1 • FOR OFFICE USE ~LY PLAN CHECK No.rc_L~--l °f_3, . '' •'/ • r.,:..:.'• CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DE,PARTMENJ .... , EST. VAL _________ _ 1635 Faraday Ave .• ,-Carl~~~ad:-cA9200a ·_.,;·:, ,;· .. Plan Ck. Deposit ________ _ .. ~. 2~-:/~::·\:/:.:~i::~::_:-t)f:·:r.t~Ti ··.-::-·:;: ;~~<'.~-~ . .-~:· ... :'. ... ::·> ·. · Validated By __ _,__7_,_ _____ _ .Date_· ___ :-,_l-~-[-O __ "L ___ _ ~~eB:Q~{IBRlffiTIQ.t:1\·,!2:;+1;~};1r¾&~~~t~~~~~~~~~~~~1r~,.-,. Add · cl de Bid /S ita•ll,.:J' .• <:.-. ·: ;:-,,· ... -·-·.:,<:(·:t:-·-e~~~~~~s'.f11a'm~Cafthisaddress)·- . ,...., .. .,_ Unit No. Phase No. Total # of units Assessor's Parcel /I :" ·Proposed Use Name· ,' · ·:· ·.' :·i.,,;-;,•µ,'.·,~:,·1;•-{'f:}Acf.ilre~j;}•,ii,{i,i, ~:.'i .. ,;.;,;;:::;1.'.i'/-;,;~•r,•,':::Y-C[tv.::1'.:... •• State/Zip Telephone# Fax# ~_m~~~A~i~~'mlti.¾f1~~'tWF~»~~l~:~1J1i?lM~4~:i~a1Jiii1l~ 1 ~~.:, • _·,,,' .:· -.,,•,f, .. ;~.:~,:.:{.:~:~·t; __ ·t'r,,.. ', , 1?-i-1, ·.,·;t~~::::.-.:rh'?:: · .. _,:·r.f;:;~.:::·. • ;,, .. ~ ... :-• ",'· , ' Name ~ , Address· .. ·._-. :City'-·: S.tate/Zip Telephone # ~¢"'i~~~~1~~~~~j~~~~~~:,~~~~, , -• , , , • ~ ., I • , • , -. • , I" •' •• • , , , • (Sec, 7031.5 Business a_nd_P,iof,ssio!1s (;l)'d'li;-·1~fC:ii'\i:!ir diurity;w.tiicfl:r~qf:lif.e~:l!,-~f!rmif.~c>'c¢!')sir.uct!' aJter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires ·t~e ~pplic~11n1:1r' $\l,C!i·J!lrmi~ '#l;fil~.,a.-'11ignej:f S!~tijirilil)~-,ttiat'.'tie·,i~ lic~il11,eil pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law · [Chapter 9, commending with Section 700d--of Division -3· of 'the Business· arid Professions Code] or lhat he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Sectio,:i 7031, 6 by any lippJ!~ant .for a permit !IU~jects·.the appll,cant to .a,civil _penalty of not more than five hundred dollars I $5001). '!t':•.' ~-~',"" I•, ',_, •. ,; _-, i.., 1, ~'i--.~~ • ·.·,,~:::\•.,._'• Jr Name State License # ~:::::::~:::: ·• . . -~·-.. :. ::i-}~~::.I:~~~!l;:~~:i~ii~: '?'~~'.'.~:r;~-~:~t~S:-i/~~v.'· ... ~ ... ·. _ State/Zip Telephone ffif~.mJA'Q:'.Me-1~.,,1tQ~;~rl~:i:.t.'}'J.1m1.11.;;i:.}~hi"t:~~~"'~l2tt1\~i;1i1~HJlq~ · ¼#t:?diirF~f.il Workers' Compensation 'Declaration:.' l:h~re~\,~a'ffirri'iJU.nd~f:;p!l~aity1-of·_fll!lr)u!)'roiie o:. , . , n1f'.lleclariitio'ns: .: . 0 I have and will.maintain;a.ceitific'~te1cit:.·b'.t5ris~6tl£o'r~iif{;~~b;ifd{wtiR'e1irB~~~'J~Jiftioihs'°jiro~lijea'tiv. Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the ~ork for w}lich tbiS PeJ;nlJ~-J.~J~~~~ci~~-:.;·,: .:\\'\ ;.::,/:~::~~:q~~;,;i';,1h;_~ :~\~:;:'~).'.,~:;:~t~J~1f~th:~;,~;-~---~-1 ~·r \: :~/\' /.:, . ./c _. . , P I have and will maiot~in· ~P,r;l,~~ll': ·~~.',1.lP,.!'~~~~19.!l~~'}~~Jf,if bY,;~~f,~(~f!; ?:7.~,g~~f' Jr~:;~.l!~iiu;;r{!.I!\ fR( the Qerformance of the work for which this permit is issued. My workers compensat1(!n.ms_Lm1,nce;9a~rt!'f,.lj(ld,,,p9hcy,nu,f11b!lr·a~e.,., -,, . · ._ ,,c,,-,,_.,;,,:.-·;: · : ,.·, • . ,,, · Insurance Company . . .. ' .. ·. --·_:·. ~ '·.: " -. . -:: P.ciJJ~v;N~/:,,,·,;·::.:·: ;> ··' -. • Expiration Date _______ _ (THIS SECTION NEED NOT B~ C01Y1Pi.Etei;,,:1i=i,1HE1PE~'~ir1ilf F;dl\' Q~'tii:tt1~~R#Q:09lil~fi~j1fiJ01~9~,tiissi 0 CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I' c~rtlfy that i.n .the.peif~rm~r'lce cif th~: wc,,/k for'whic:h t!Jis f)erl)'l.it is ·issued,· I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws_ of'Calif?rn!a. ·. · ' · ., ··--.. , -·: • WARNING: Failure to secure workers' comperi111tion coverag11 la unlawful, ,and ahan subject an ·employer to criminal penalties and civll fines up to one hundred thousand.dollars ($100,000), in addition to the'.i:01t of.ciompensiitlon, dainagllii·'iii·pr_ovided for In Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees. ~ • < ( '•' • ! ' • • • 't • ~ • r • • • -' t • • • • SIGNATURE ... ,,,; .. , .. ~ .... ,., ... _._., .. "·· ,·•':".::;-_.-: · DATE iiia'1t!~~~[lt~ffigj(~1:to~: · · .. · I hereby affirm that I am exempt·trom the Coritractcir1s l: 'ensii."~aw for the .f9110·w.ing-reason:_ · .. ~ · 0 I, as owner of the property or .my employel!s with,_Y,'.aget as their sole compensation,_ will ·do·.the work and.the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Cpde:: Tt,a-'.R_o,ntr~~!Of's ,J.ic~nse Lay., -~o'!~ -not-apply J9 an _i:>,Yo(ner,-of.,p_rop!lrtY who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work hii:iJself or thr9ugti,,hili own·,~rppl9,v,e·11.~, Bf.OYt<f,tth11ts4~h imP,r~Y§me11~s-,re,.~q~Jn~e.nd_ed or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one, year of completion; the owner-builder wll!.have·the burden of provlhg'that he0aid',:iot ~uiltl or improve for the purpose of sale). 0 I, as oWn~r of the propJrty',''arli'.'.eifciusi'vely'c~~tfactinfwffh-lic~r\;~;n;~~trac\brJ\~.;~'J:~sffi:ici't'ttie' project (Sec. 7044, B~siness and Professions Code: The Contractor's license Lav/ili>'e~ not ·1);,p1y·Hhi:ni-0Wh'ar''):if:pr~p(rJY \1./_!if~yil~tiir)np/?>v,~: ther~o~~ ·a~d. ,con~~acts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuaot to the ~Cont~a.ct~r·~ ~ic;eD':~:-~~~l· '., ~,.,;:--~.:ct -~,1; ;·~ £ .. :. 'i'1,~ti :::;1:'.~;~, /'o:1,°i-.~~~{~f;Fx;~~ '\.':,;:,., -\.1·,~ ;/:,i, ~ \· , . ~: , ~ · 0 I am exempt under Section --r:' ~. :-!"'.: Ellisinii~~ }'r{cf Prdtesslons·' ~ode fo(i:his :rea~~r(·'" ... -;-,:-·., . 1. I personally plan to provide the: maj~r_,latjgf'Blld:m-i'tiri~ls,totic:onstrt~tiph}>fitli~,J>:r9po~~-!H;iqpe~Y,ill]~roveinent. 0: YES ONO 2. I (have/ have not) ~igri~fah'~p,i/ii~.~~/t>\?~1(~;~y//~tQ.~~~~\wJf~9r)b~;ef~~o~~~~t~~~'.!(f:·l7'.f1:.··;t'/ \'t 3. I have contracted with· ~he follpWing·pers9n.,;(fjr.11J)401'Pn:>~ide·1th~i·p(.qpo,s~p',qoMttuctid11· Hn_cl~d~-m1f(le.'/ ad~ress / phone number/ contractors license number): ' .. , ·'. : ··-....... ' -.. ,;, .. ,,... . .. • , t,,_·_ •• -•• •, .,,,,1.~ ,,.., .• : .... ~.~ ..... :_,_. , .• --~·-t,.,-: ,._ 4. I plan to provide portio~~ ,of''ii,~ w~;k;·:ti&t:·l ha.v'.~iilirelth4'i~fto~i,ri~-P~~~~h·i~Jq9td(~~,e:,'.~up.~ryis~·~.;·d pr~vide the major work (include name / address / phone number/contractorslicensenurriber): ' -· -,, ·.l. ·:··-, ·; ••· ··· .· ·., .• c .. -',',';· ::,'.'. '('_,•;:','-~· · · 5. I will provide some of. th!! work, ~ut' ( 1:i~Y-,:~pp~~~~(i~_:'(~j~~di';h~ _:rolJo~iptp~f~;rii:fo;~fij1\~i1~~: w"~rk in~icated (include name/ address / phone number/ type · of work): . . .. ,. • · .. ''· " .. '·' ·., '-:-··· -,·:·:: ._ .. -----.·'.',·:· ·: ,. ··-· -· ·.· ... ·· PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE ,·-·:·,, '• '· ... ,,· , .. , :· ,;:·-'·.-DATE tc6MG.11'.'l.il~~~-N!ll"ffli.-ffifflililftiiM~~ll~~~-it~-.m-· ,,.-.... -.~-fi-,"-f:~-_.-,""-:. --~-!""-,,-... -~ffl.~~it- . ·;~-t~e ·ap;li~a~t or -f~t~;·bu;ld;n~ ~ccup~~; ~~~~i;~~ t.h~t>rrilt a b~~in~~~ ~,~rt" a.cutely ~a:z:lirdo~~ materials r~gistrati~n for~ or ,risk m;·n;gement a~d, preven~i~~ program under Sections _255.9x•: 2;&6~,3 or/5,53~ f~ ~h?-:~r~~!tft~~n!'r::F,l~~~!qo.~!1-i;,uJ!~~a,:i~~:~-gf~.~.of Agt? 0 YES O NO Is the applicant or future building occupant.required·fo otlt_i,in.'a.i>ermit from Jhe air pollution control district or air quality management district? 0 YES D NO . . . . . ,\ . . Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 .feet of th'! outer·boundary of a school site? · 0 YES · -0 NO - ~E~~YR~~::::~:~He:~~~~E~~:;et~~AE~~~R:t~etci~ ~N~C;~:.::~:ott~~l~~\~~;:~~t~~~i~~-THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE r~~~1ls1B1l~trffli~l@ll"i~~~~;t~~~~~"'l\1µ.~~~,~~~~--~~~i~~~1~1~~'l\~~;~~~~~~1:,t'$~0,'it-,.'£i,;,~~<~1t1t::~#,1'~: !i-~ .o; ,,...... ...... ~ ... !l!""~---• ::.-:~· .. =· ..... -'l.;,~,,::n.: ..... ~~if~~ -~ .... __ M.f ~ ....... , • .il!tt<I~ al ,_,:;., .~il>.;::n ~I'"~ :, '" -= .. ~;wr-.::tt:r /,..,'i ----,11,_ •• , .... ,_ ;:.,..,,Mn .. ,. I hereby·affirm that there is ·a-c·oristruqtiiln [~nding·agericy.fqr lhe, performailci!'.of ,ttt;e w.oi~. for w~icf(this permit is'issued (Sec. 3097(i) Civil Code). • ' • ·' t , ',_·~ •• •,: ......... u·,, -·_ • ·~r-: . ;:':·.,: ,· -... ~ ·~ ,:• ... ·. '• ;> ' : •• LENDER'S NAME ... ~. :·,. :-... · :''"'-.'.•,:,.,, ,>.'L-._,.--~2:r, .. i,.;.,,,,'.'..:il:.j;_ND~B:.s:AO,pR!;S~ ... '-,;.'. ... ''' .... '' ... ·:: __ .:.-,.,..:' ... :.,-;-L· ... '· ... '"~;...;'·: .... __ .:, ___ ... : _, ______________ _ rtr~.erMtr1t1Uf1™,~~¥~1t~~~~-~1:j;m:~~~~~~~~.m.1'~~:.~~ ! certify that I hav~ read the appliqation •ail~ statit'th'at t&1f:a1io;e)fnfor~~tion'i~\19rrei?f ~!)q';{~'iifth~ ioformition cin the plans is accurate, I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws ~elating··to .building, c9n,str,ili:.tio·n~-~,-h,\lreby-:a4t~oriz!1r~pr~~ilnt~tives· ,of 'tfie ,Citt ·of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes,· .I ALSO AG!JEE''TO,·~AVE;·''INDEMNIFY 1ANt;>'JKEEf:'':HARMLE$S 'THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSE13'WHICI-Ht'IAY.·:IN'ANYcWA-Y\ACCRUE0AGAINSrsAiD'CIT)' 'IN-CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA p'ermit' is te·qciir~d·J~i'~~~ay~tip.ns ci~i ~!<J!'~\i~~~1ancl'~i~iii~liii~ri.'6{~&.ri,,~~·~tii'!~:~i,~~~uct·~r!ls ~~er 3 stories in height. EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by th~'bJiiding,O~[cialiui:i~Jttfi~ p/ovliioh~:of-ttils··so~.~\tt~il-expire'by:limitatlon.and become null and void If the building or work aut(lorized by such permit is not commeni,E!d wjthi/i 1~0,5f~Y.l!J~9fTL!ti,~;dat1;1.:(?f {1,1c!1;p~rrriii;otif:!ij/fl'iµijdin~.cir-work ~uthorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is comml;lnceµ f. . period·o ·: ... -. a · ,·(Section}1 .. Q~.<t4 Uriiforn'J'Builafng,Qoi;le). . ' ·,. l,;t~~:.~-~--·~~--,.~':; .··~~\.},! '·'·'':•~!,_. ·: ,• •. •' '1-APPUCANT'S SIGNATURE · -... . .. . . ,,.... . .. ' . . DATE ____________ _ YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance •' ' . . ': ~· i : EsGil Corporati.on 1.n Partnersli.ip witli. (jovemment for '.Builaing Safetg DATE: 7/17/02 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 02-361 rev (PCR02-l93) PROJECT ADDRESS: 1932 Kellogg Ave. PROJECT NAME: Life Medical Revision SET~ II ~ ANT JURIS. 0 N REVIEWER D FILE D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and su_bstantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. [8'.I The plans transmftted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified oelow are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies Identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a cornpl'ete recheck. D The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list ·is enclosed for th~ jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. D The applicant'~ copy of the check list has been sent to: [8'.I Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. D Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. -p~rson contacted: Telephone#: ·, Date, contacted: (by: ) Fax #: l Mail L Telephone Fax In Person i:gj REMARKS: 1. Note on the plan that all the new spaces are for storage only. 2. Note on the plan that window 25 for space #1 and window 27 for space #4, #5 ·and #7 shall be tempered glass. 3. Note on the plan to provide occupancy sensors for all' the new spaces. By: David Yao · Esgil Corporation Enclosure$: original_ approved_plan o, GA D MB D EJ D PC log tmsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858) 560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 EsGH Corpo-ratio.n 'l.n Partnersli.ip Witli. (jovemment for 'lJuift(ing Safety DATE: 7./ 16/02 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 02-:361.rev(PCR02-193) PROJECT ADDRESS: 1932. Kellogg Ave. PROJECT NAME: Life Medical SET:1 ~~T ~ D PLAN REVIEWER D FILE D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. D The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. ~ The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. ~ The applicant's copy of the check li_st has been sent to: Garth Packard p.o . .B()7< 11:i.'-I (Ag.L55P...D, CA Cj:zc, ~ Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Garth Packard (J, ~) Telephone#: (760)802-5107 · Date contacted:+\ 1 V>{ 02(by: 1~ ) Fax #: Mail .,.......--Telephone...-Fax In Person D REMARKS: By: David Yao Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC 7/9 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858) 560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad 02 .. 361 rev(PCR02-193) 7/16/02 GENl:RAL PLAN. CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: Carlsbad rev(PCR02-l 93) PROJECT ADDRESS: 1932 Kellogg Ave. DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY . ESGIL CORPORATION: 7/9· REVIEWED BY: David Yao . - FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): PLAN CHECK NO.: 02-361 DATE REVIEW COMPLETED: 7/16/02 This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations·. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state-, county or city law. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commerciaflindustrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all Corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-_1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad 13uilding Department for _routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. · NOTE: Plc;1ns that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. • To facilitate rechecking, pJease identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised· plans. • Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? O Yes 0 No ' . \.,. Carlsbad 02-361 rev(PCR02-193) 7/16/02 1. The drawing changes show relocated steel pipe column at restrooms. What is the function of tt:le steel pipe column? Provide framing plan to show it. Is there spread footing underne_ath the column? Any new footing needed? Please clarify. 2. What is the use of new space #1-#9? Still storage? Please specify on the floor plan. 3. The new window 27 for the new space shall be tempered glass. Please specify on the plan. 4. The drawing changes show removed shear panel at door openings. Please clarify how much shear wall been removed? Provide calculation/comment to show the wall is adequate. 5. The original E1, E2 sheet shows occupancy sensors been inked in. Provide occupancy sensors for all the new rooms. . 6. The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208,_San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact David Yao at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. Carlsbad 02-361 rev(-PCR02-193) 7/16/02 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad rev(PCR02-193) PLAN CHECK NO.: 02-361 PREPARED BY: David Yao DATE: 7/16/02 BUILDING ADDRESS: 1932 Kellogg Ave. _ BUILQING OCCUPANCY: TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: BUILDING AREA Valuation Reg. VALUE PORTION ( Sq. Ft.) Multiplier Moc:I. multrpt:e revisio_n$. . Air Conditionin.g Fire Sprinklers --. TOTAL VAl-UE Jurisdiction Code cb By Ordinance · Bldg. Permit Fee by Ordinance 1..;· 1 2 Plan ~heck Fee by Ordinance Type of Review: D Complete Review D Structural Only D Repetitive "Fee 3 Repeats • Based on hourly rate Comments: D Other Q Hourly 21 Hours* Esgil Plan Review Fee ($) $240.001 $192.001 Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue.doc Carlsbad Fire Department 1635 Faraday Ave. Carlsbad, CA 92008 Plan Review Requirements Category: Fire Prevention (760) 602-4660 Date of Report: _01_1_31_12_0_02 _______ _ Building Plan Reviewed by: A~ Name: Architectural Expr. Address: 1521 Sunrise Drive City, State: Vista CA 92084 Plan Checker: Job#: 02193 ------- Job Name: Life Medical Bldg#: PCR02193 --------------------------a'--- Job Address: 1932 Kellogg Avenue Ste. or Bldg. No. ~ Approved D Approved Subject to D Incomplete Review FD Job# The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information. and / or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes and standards. Please review carefully all comments attached as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. The item you have submitted for review has been approved subject to the attached conditions. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided. in your submittal. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or· install improvements. Please resubmit to this office the necessary plans and / or specifications required to indicate compliance with applicable codes and standards. The item you have submitted fot review is incomplete. At this time, this office cannot adequately conduct a review to determine compliance with the applicable codes and / or standards. Please review carefully all comments attached. Please resubmit the necessary plans and / or specifications to this office for review and approval. 1st 02193 2nd FD File# 3rd Other Agency ID ., A'tex -~ ARCHITECTURAL TECHNICAL .EXPRESS 1521 Sunrise Drive, Vista, California 92084 _ Phone:-{-760) 732-3648 DATE: TO: FROM: July 8, 2002 · Garth Packard :Oavid A. Dixon PROJECT: Life Medical Tenant Improvement DRAWING CHANGES The follow4lg is a iist of changes made to the drawings to reflect present as-built conditions and other propos~d revisions. A. DRAWING A3 1. Deleted slab removal at west.end for westerly wood post at keyed note 10. 2. Added slab removal for plumbing for sink below stair #2. 3. Relocated steel pipe column at restrooms. B. DRAWING A4 . 1. Relocated steel pipe column at restrooms. 2. Added walls, door~ and windows for spaces # 1 thru #9. 3. · Relocated 4" x 8'' wood post at west end for wood post at keyed note 12. 4. Added sink below stair #2 and at spaces #2 and #3. 5. Deleted west wall from storage # 1. 6. Added door to space below stair #1. C. DRAWING AS 1. Relocated steel pipe column at restrooms. 2. Added sink at southwest comer of display. 3. Added furred-out walls at existing concrete walls at display and office. 4. Relocated furred-out walls for HV AC ducts at office. D._ DRAWING AS 1. Added furred-out wall at cone. walls at display and office. E. DRAWING S1 1. Relocated steel -pipe column at restrooms. 2. Noted existing footing which extends to slab surface at west wall. 3. Removed shear panel at door openings. 'F. DRAWINGS2 1. Changed 4" x 12" wood beam to 5 1/2" x 9 1/2" patallam beam at keyed note 4. G. DRAWING S6 1. Revised detail 1 .,.--see keyed note 5. H. DRAWING El 1. Added walls and doors at spaces # 1 thru #9. 1 fl I i j I· I i I < 1 I I I I,, ! ~ ! l '. I j '. ; i I i ! · II -l 2. Added electrical outlets at spaces #1 thru #9. 3. Revised lighting at spaces # 1 thru #9. 4. Revised HVAC registers and diffusers at spaces #1 thru #7. I. ·nRA WING E2 1. Added furred-out Walls at existing concrete walls. 2. Added electrical outlets. , I j if there ·are any questions or comments concerning the above please feel free to contact me. : I Respectfully, 1·,~,;. ! ½{~id A. Dixon ! ' i l I I . ' j f I l l ii : I ! ; l i ! i ! ' 'I \ 'i I I I 1 ~ i: ! I Architect 2 ,i,:; '> ~ -==,~~~9 ~f 4 ' 1,'3% f-~ =o r -:---:+..7 I~ :~3 I I '• l ? ~,J.t', '2 1/.ij-I '~f t:'1"': io" 1/].I ~ /-··: :~ J, f ' • I ~I ;.-...--==''-::. --s;_-,-k~=-::::~---=-~ :--.--:.,:iH,"S -----,-..:i, ·_,,_'\. ~ """'\te:-~.:=,.;;;Ji\, -~ \,' ·--'--'-~~ -_._ ---~--·----~ -. --'.. --"-.~::.::_. __ 1 --..L ~ • -~) ' -M\.'r Q. , ~/ , u) I.fl ~,., 0 ., , 'I , -" t:) _., t).~ .... 4 ? I 'l:t" r ~ I=-:::::.::: .. --'1 r.K: GTIJ "'-'·,:»T-~"''-~7 1 J! ~ t :~ ~ b.. >.:--r--)-':s} , 11 L'.!J2J I l' , 31 II I ,, J .. 11 ,, '' l I I 11!('~~ .-4 -b ,. 7-0 1. 0 LIi 4--~., --t, ~:;"~ 51-1!" tl'l'I '~,, ~ l l1i ,~171 Ii I~~ Q 11~ ,~~ j I. ·.: .. ·-~. =--.---· ___ _____,_ __ -.. -=-=-:.: :--:::j I • -Z,S.% f-~1 { _.::0-~. ~ .. ·"""--§1 I ._,t: ~---___ ).. ___ ) I '" '-'i II -'._-·, j·4 .. "'I Ii"''"'' '---'.____, 11 : ~.-, '~ ,,:N~' ',_:,__, :I~--~~--___ !: _ --~::~J:: -~~; ~ -:~ ~ ··-> ~ ~Jt tf _, -11 I "' l ·, I ~ ...___.,,_ ~ = I If i.;: .s;::-...:..-, . ..S:. --~-l~~,-...... .._,;; _, __ .__ -:l-..J -~-,-<;,,--~~-·------,"---:--.--.,,_~ . ' U. ~-~--~------------C~:-~ · --r--i ::.r-i = : ·~ ... '----~~-" ---·------.::. -·-·-·l. ·-__ ..., ____ ._ .. -· t. @] L.@J-i,.,_. __ }:!J I • -. n r· J I .. .:-:;:_ 11 ..._,, i'-II l'1 . IS .13 I-G:> 14 · I-~ -...'... ~,:,V 5 '14- ,----, r----7 r-----7 r--T-..1 1 "1~1-' •-----• L-----• L--~: r.:7 _'.-.1 ~,, '· 'I I '\,._ J ~ l:-l "-. I 1--,,~~-~ r -, r-~ ~, f r·J 'L.1 ,,,., " ,'~ - 1. ·,," . • I \ '-., '-, .,I j. . ' '-l -C) I • '., . I ,·., ·.,, , ...... l .._ -., ', . I , . ... ' , . : o', ' ' -:::1· ,, • ' I f',, ' '· ' -(t\ I l I 4' • 41/4" [~" I '3'-i;," l~~-v 13'-0' l°'-,:' I 3'. ~"!-J}-f; ~'/~' f 1 1 1 . , t-I ::i:_:; .-------, L __ --_J r------+ L,. _____ ! DEMOLITION FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1 /8" = 1 '-0" .. I I I --¼ r--,-.._..,, ~1---l-l-' u') I ,' £0 O' " ' '• I f.. • I I 1'• I I I " I'. l ~ ' L· • ._,; o z f' I' ,, r ---~ . '~ \ __ ':!:-==-~~-.,.--_-.:. t~I APeROVED. 11 BY ~ JUL l; lf2002 11 City of CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPT. ~ KEYED NOTES IJJ WALL TO REMAIN. [I] REMOVE WALLS, DOORS, WINDOWS & ELECTRICAL ITEMS (DASHED LINES). [TI REINSTALL CONTROLS ON NEW WALL. IT] REMOVE CARPET. (]] REMOVE SUSPENDED GRID CEILING, LIGHTS & HVAC. (]] REMOVE SHEET VINYL. [TI REMOVE DRYWALL CEILING, LIGHTS & HVAC. (]] REMOVE LAVATORY & PIPING. [[} REMOVE WATER-CLOSET & PIPING. [I§J SAWCUT & REMOVE 3'-0" SQUARE SECTION OF 5" CONC. SLAB (CROSS- HATCHED). [ill REMOVE PARTITIONS. O]) REMOVE & SALVAGE WATER HEATER & FITTINGS. SEE DWGS. M7 & E1. Qfil REMOVE SINK & PIPING. [HJ EXIST. 6" DIA. STL. PIPE COL. l}fil REMOVE ELECT. DISTRIBUTION PANEL. ~ SAWCUT & REMOVE 1'-3" . WIDE SECTION OF 5" CONC. SLAB (CROSS-HATCHED). 02) SAW.CUT & REMOVE 2'-0" WIDE SECTION OF 5" CONC. · SLAB (CROSS-HATCHED). , l}fil SAW.CUT & REMOVE 1'-0" WIDE SECTION OF 5" CONC. SLAB (CROSS-HATCHED). l}fil REMOVE LIGHTS (5 LOC.). I 201 REMOVE & SALVAGE LIGHTS (3 LOC.). SEE DWG. E1. (m EXIST. CONC. SIDEWALK W/ 2.0% SLOPE. EXIST. ASPHALT PAVING AT 0) < z 0::: 0 u. ::i ..J < < 0 I-0 C z c < w m < ~ ~ z w 0::: w u. ~ I-::i "S!' Ill co Ill 0 ~ e N 0. CJ) )( (3 ~ w a> iu ~ C: 0 u .c ·2 5 C. .c Cl> co u "S!' II) .f: co I-(") iu ·o I a> N, ... ct) :J 1/) t--.... ·c: u C: s ~ :J (0 en t::::. .c .... 2 ~ <t .... A'tex -~ ~ 0 g LL zz 0~ !:: D.. ...I 0 ~ w C @] H.C. PARKING SPACE W/ 2.3% DATE: SLOPE. 1/30/02 (Rev. 7/8/02) ! 23 ! EXIST. 6" CONC. CURB. ! 24 ! EXIST. H.C. SIGN. l 25 l SAW-CUT & REPLACE DRAWN: DD PROJ. NO.: 0201 ASPHALTP GW/~6~ I" 11£_~~\L~S-'PH~L ~QI DWG. NO. '-.. -~-STRIPE TO 1 A3 MATCH EXIST. SEAL-COAT ASPHALT. · 5 30 pc.t.~.t., ! • ~ _o, . ~ +• =~ . -'It 7 +1 =~ I N -, j +l '"<Yl ' • 'I¼- s'-d'! t.(o' · 4'' ± 4-17 '.~II:" , ' ~ ' STOR,AG,f: :#'f ..__ ______ §] ! Ug_. ----...,-~~ -S'I{ WAIZEHOU0S ~I ~I -~ 41 _1;4" ta'-7'' HALL -41;1 l ----,--, -~!!!!!:!!:=~~=7 ...,,.-~ tf :;_ .~Ffff~~'MRI I-, ,--71 0 I . ,, t -I Afill~ I I I I I i ! I r(\ ~1 I \JI +-I I I I i' I I \ ) I I ~3.~~6nl-~' ~~--ll--=----_-_---'-:=',,.-i=_ ,1--"r ~~ ro'-S" ,1_ I ~. ( 7 T, @II")) ~ ~, :' -i'-:: ·c, , , At_;\~ IS'-111 I ~ 8 ~Ac~ if! ·~ --~ [ill II1J'l~ 10'-011 10'-0'1 I I I ( , z'.1. ,, i-3'':: II. 2.-"'1. %'-'}''-:. I ~ 'Sf'Ac.E ~4 '?P'AcE :#1,. ! ~ ' fw. I ( ~ ---- 13 1-f,'1 <0f',t,.q:: # ~ ~. \ ~ t.& ~ -----1,1 ~ I~'-~' S fAc.~-tr ;f· --:fil fl\ --~ 13 1-'711 :!: s1'-1 1' + ~ \'(' ~, +1 -r<' -~1 WA~HOl)"?S ~'2. . I z.+'-4-II t . ~ I F.1:: C 0 ~I ,, ~ KEYED NOTES OJ m m -[TI EXIST. OVERHEAD GARAGE DOOR. l}J EXIST. 6" DIA. F.S. STANDPIPE. (]] EXIST. STEEL LADDER TO ROOF. 11] EXIST. 1" DIA. COPPER WATER PIPE. (]] EXiST. 4" DIA. PVC ROOF DRAINS. (]] REMOUNT EXIST. CONTeROLS, CABLES mJ & APPURTENANCES ON NEW 3/4" x 8'-0" x 4'-0" PLYWOOD PANEL. NEW 2" x 4" STUDS AT 16" O.C. W/ 5/8" TYPE "X" DRYWALL EACH SIDE (SHADED). []J] NEW 2"_x 6" STUDS AT 16" 0.0. WI 518" TYPE "X" DRYWALL EACH SIDE (SHADED). [ill NEW 4" x 8" WOOD POST (5 LOC.). (TI] NEW 3'-0" x 6'-8" x 1 3/4" S.C. WOOD DOOR WITH H.C. HARDWARE. [El NEW 3'-0" x 6'-8" x 1 3/4" S.C. WOOD DOOR. O]:j EXIST. FULL-HEIGHT STOREFRONT MANUFACTURED GLAZING WI 1.130 U- FACTOR, 0.44 SHGC & GREYLT 14 TYPE CERTIFIED PER CALC. METHOD. (ill LINE OF 2ND FLOOR ABOVE. [TI] EXIST. HOSE BIBB. (m SAW-CUT WALL PANEL & PROVIDE NEW 9'-0" x 3'-4" (APPROX. DIM'S) WINDOW TO MATCH EXIST. WINDOWS PER KEYED NOTE 15. FIELD VERIFY DIM'S. [Ifil PAINT 2" WIDE STRIPES AT 8" O.C. ON CONC. SLAB. PAINT SHALL BE NON- SLIP. 120 I NEW 4" DIA. PIPE BOLLARD PER DETAIL 5/S6 (6 LOG.). ~ NEW BRADYLINK NO. 78238 YELLOW LINK CHAIN (REMOVABLE). I 221 NEW SIGN W/ 1" LETTERS BOTH SIDES - -"DO NOT STOCK-PILE OBJECTS BETWEEN CHAIN & DOOR". w > 0 0::: a. ~ ..J < -0 c I-c < z w m <( :E "' ...J z w o= w u. < I-:i 0 "<t' 1/1 (X) ~ 0 X N .. 0) J!? C. tS "" )( W, Q) jij «i C: 0 u ti .c: '2 > 0. J: Cli (X) g "<t' > (0 I-·;::: C'? ~ 0 N Q) (\') ::, rn I'-•;::: -C: 0 u ~ ::::i (0 en !:::::-. J: ..-u N .. lO-<( ..- A'tex -~ z rx: So 0. 0 ..J ..J W LL C t-0 Cl) :iE ~ W LL rx: 'Sf'A GE: -4:'- ~ <S>fA<:e tl7 LT ~ _ ---~----+-----~ I 111?~C£½~~11 eL~~~ ~ <Sf7\Ce"'-8 I 23 I NEW 3 5/8" x 24 GAUGE STEEL STUDS DATE: AT 16" o.c. WITH 5/8" TYPE "X" 1/30/02 (Rev. 7/8/02) [El ~ DRYWALL EACH SIDE. NEW 2A10BC FIRE EXTINGUISHER (4 LOC.). DRAWN: DD PROJ.NO.: 0201 I -,--. REMODEL PLAN -FIRST FLOOR SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" o z NEW 8'-0" x 3'-6" FIXED GLASS WINDOW. I 26 I NEW 6'-0" x 3'-6" FIXED GLASS WINDOW. I 27 I NEW 4'-0" x 3'-6" FIXED GLASS WINDOW. DWG.NO. A4 SH. 6 OF 30 "'-S.1 1 • 111 ~ 1 A~Ji fJ~I -;,,-:,;-?\X~r@[,._._--.---------:±1 I -U--if- -~ +1 l ! er-~-! -" ~ I -+---1 I -,;;r I I +-1 <r-- I Ii\ -:)'- ! j l •II~ ;-, DI.SPL.1~Y ~ -\5} I ? 11 lo-111/4--?Q'-4. I/ u+ -. , r4 _ j~ ,. 1i: -1) !rlft!!!!!!!!_..,,.J [I] .. ---~) :if HALL ~1.. , ~ J -N I 11 +-4-• 10 - ;-, Of"EtJ -~ m Its" E) · ~---:·:-'1fl~~' r;;.. ![ " - , o I...._._._------....__.__._-_._____...,.~"-r£t~~,r_~8 I,[\ '' I' ···r(8! ~··r! , .l I ~ f +-,-.,.-,-----:---:-~-r-r-DN. ' 2 /._ 1 ~i l~lis.'-i" I •I S ·7 ~ -, -- :--E!J !' ~ --+~=::;-:19~+ I l Ur,~. -, I I l0iJs1-10''1'l ~ " 'f ... I <:!JI \_ S'-10 :;,(.o • I ~, ... ,,-+ 'Z._1.::i -~ I ----- office ' 1 ITfJ I :-v1 ~o ; Ii ~oj RC7 wf'.¥h J -- [~}--} ~ 11 ! REMODEL PLAN-SECOND FLOOR SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" ~ ~ AG~B-~ \'fl 0 z dJ. 24-44 ! Of;,~µ -t i 07 0 [IH KEYED NOTES OJ EXIST. WALL. [II EXIST. 6" DIA. STEEL PIPE COLUMN (4 LOC.). III _EXIST. 6" DIA. F.S. STANDPIPE. [}J EXIST. 1" DIA. COPPER WATER PIPE. I}] EXIST. STEEL - LADDER TO ROOF. (]] EXIST. 4" DIA. PVC ROOF DRAINS. [Il NEW 2" x 4" STUDS AT 16" O.C. WITH5/8" TYl?E "X" DRYWALL EACH SIDE (SHADED). (]] NEW 2" x 611 STUDS AT 16" O.C. WITH 5/8" TYPE "X" DRYWALL EACH SIDE (SHADED). m NEW 3'-0" x 6'-8" x 1 3/4" S.C. WOOD DOOR. [IQ) NEW 3'-0" X 6'-8" x 1 3/4" S.C. WOOD DOOR WITH H.C. HARDWARE. [TI] EXIST. 9'-0" x 3'-4" MANUFACTURED WINDOW W/ GLAZING W/ 1.130 U-FACTOR, 0.44 SHGC & GREYL T 14 TYPE CERTIFIED PER CALC. METHOD. [g] NEW 3 5/8" x 24 GAUGE STEEL STUDS AT 16" O.C. WITH 5/8" TYPE "X" DRYWALL. [TI] 2" x 4" STUD WALL DUCT CHASE --SEE G}-1 I DWG. M2. [HJ NEW 2A10BC FIRE EXTINGUISHER (1 LOC.). TI !J]] NEW 6'-0" x 3'-6" FIXED GLASS WINDOW. 7 O]) NEW 5'-0" x 3'-6" FIXED GLASS WINDOW. 0, UJ s > z 0 rx: 0:: 0 LL. a. ::i ':E ..J < -< 0 I-0 c z 2i < w m <( == u, z w ..J rx: UJ LL. < I-::i 0 -q-U) <X) U) 0 ~ e N Q. a, ->< <{ olS w (.) (I) ia «i C: 0 _g ~ .c: C Q. .c (I) <X) ~ """ > (0 I-·;:: (T)· 0 'I ia Q) N ... (T) :::, u, I'--·;:: (,) C: s :, ~ Cl) (0 .c ,... t:. ~ N <t LO ,... A'tex -~ z 0:: :3 0 D.. g .J LL We Cz Oo :E 0 ww 0:: Cl) DATE: 1/30/02 (Rev. 7/8/02) DRAWN: DD PROJ.NO.: 0201 DWG.NO. AS SH. 7 OF 30 ·I /; l / 1··1 I I ---u I ! 9 /. I ~ I I I I Ht----j _,_a . I . ; I I l 1 J 1it-tt---1ii,:.i '\"' fl ;; I IS I ~ .. 1'2.7 -u_--~-d pr-~~-~~--1 I ----1 ' --- ---~ I-r=:r=1=~ [ IP _:j 0 ~-~---·=rrj t 1-t .. ll -- -----j M 1-----, 1 111 ''' '"' ',)I / 4===111 l~=========::==J/ l ~- '~-1f! I ~ t I KEYED NOTES DJ EXIST. CONG. WALL. []J EXIST. CONG. SLAB. I]] EXIST. CONG. FOOT W EXIST. STOREFRON SI IT] m [II m EXIST. ROOF. I rn r-IT= QQ] NEW CONG. SPREAD FOOTING. NEW 4" x 811 WOOD POST. NEW 2" x 4" STUDS AT 16"O.C. [IT] @] ~ I 127, ITfil NEWSUSP. GRID CEILING. NEW 2" x 4" CEILING JOISTS AT 16" O.C. NEW 3/8" PLYWOOD. [}±] NEW7"x117/8" PARALLAM BEAM. . I : [IT! NEW CONT. CONC. , II I I 7 i FOOTING. c:, :E N 0, w :$ > z 0 0:: r:r:: 0 u. a. :J :E ..J cC -~ (.) t-c:i' z c cC < w m :E rn z ,.J w 0:: w LI. ~ I--:-:::J 'I:!" .,, CX) .,, 0 l!! N X 0) ~ 0. <( )( 0/:1 w (.) iG t Q) C: _g 0 > .c: C Q. .c a," CX) > ...,. I I I b~~~=====J ,---, ~ I -./: l ;h -... ~ . ,·j ;=·. l'1" . . 1 \ I r:-- :~ NEW 11 7/8" TJl'S AT 16" o.c. J1_; [ill ~ ·c (0 ~ 0 ~ Q) I~ _· ii . ~·-"-1, . ~ . , L) ·;; , . l-----i ...L_ ~,_· _, o. \ __ .. J li~I _, IX) ~ \' ~ /I I~ Jr ~ II l'J I i'."""7 I I I j I 7 II ~: I/ I I I ''~-- I I I l, I ~ m ~ I 1:::>: 't--1 / '~ I __ -!,_ ff . -. -J t= .. -.· .-~----1-. "·1-/~ ,,..,,,, ,,,, -.:::/, ',-" --( I • ~ • , ''A /)-' ,., ' • -, I 1~ .... ~,-..,.,'J, ''' L __ J-.. ,~-;-J ',1 • ,.;_ V' , 0 BUILDING SECTION SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0" 14 I I_, 3 D]] 13]] @§] ~ @] IE] ~ NEWT JI JOIST HANGER. NEW 3/4" T&G (42/20) WI 10d AT 6"_Q.C. EDGES & AT 12" O.C. FIELD. NEW 4" x 12" P.T.D.F. LEDGER W/ 3/4" DIA. x 811 QUIK-BOLTS, EMBEDDED 41/2" (ICBO #4016) AT 16" O.C. & 5" TO 12" FROM ENDS. NEW 2" x 4" P.T.D.F. NEW 2" x 4" BOTTOM PLATE. NEW DBL. 2" x 4" TOP PLATE. NEW 2" x 4" BLOCKING AT48"O.C. NEW 2" x 14" BLOCKING (RIP TO 11 7/8"). ::I 1/) (") I ·c I'-C: s ::I (/) co .c T"" t::. e N <( lO T"" A'tex -~ z 0 ~ w u, (!) z i5 ..J 5 m ~ ~ NEW 5/8" DRYWALL. DATE: 1/30/02 (Rev. 7/8/02) REPLACE STUCCO SOFFIT W/ NEW STUCCO SOFFIT TO MATCH EXIST. I 27 I NEW 3 5/8" x 24 GAUGE STEEL STUDS AT 16" O.C. WITH 5/8" TYPE "X" DRYWALL. DRAWN: DD PROJ.NO.: 0201 DWG.NO. AB SH. 10 OF 30 I /' j'' ,--7_ I O ••-.-------101 -------------•• ~ ~ ---··@ _r---~--~ rr=.~,~---~~ ~-:-=-=. -==-~-~ .. -==-=:--~~==c_ -==-=. _=._ ===-~=-_====· -==:=::;:: : . . . I +i : : :~------·---.I 0 !, ~i ~ l., ... -~ ! .. 1 r1~ . n---. $ I • 7,., I r I i r ! I I·.· .. ·:.:·.·.··· .. · ... : ····I I I : ! ~ * w-+1 ~'5,ojt-,"·.:4-•1___,:•. ,: :·:. .•. . • • • . • . . • •. I !:F 1 =f ' ... 1 I 'f .... ··.~1--9 I ·Qi- ij. L .. I r··-' I oil•· I i l L..l I I ; II i j I ~- i : i I I ! ·r- I 1P1 -0'1 ' 131-0'' • I I I?'-&,, I l:,'·1" ± 111 i ' ! I =- • •II 0 _, I ·.j) ' ~~--- . -·· ;..... ,,, -t i ---------- l, i v-. --· ~- @ FOUNDATION PLAN 0- SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" z .,,.-,:-:;:---~ r'./,.::.t:-D A~c1'J~ KEYED NOTES. .f:<:-:::~~!/~~,~~ . . ·;;; ,V .---. U/-f-~(\\' ' -:.z;,~ *"(" C-18371 • OJ EXIST. TILT-U CONC. WALL. IT] m m [[I m [II rn [~ lli] OIi @] @] EXIST. CONC. FOOTING. EDGE OF EXIST. CONC. SLAB. EXIST. ROUND COLUMN. EXIST. CONC. SLAB APPROX. 5" THICK. EXIST. 6" DIA. STEEL PIPE COLUMN (4 LQC.)'. EXIST. CONC SPREAD FOOTING. NEW 4" x 811 D.F. NO, 1 POST (5 LOC.). NEW 3'-0" SQ. x 2'-0" DEEP CONC. SPREAD FOOTING (5 LOC.) WI 4 #4 BARS AT9" O.C. EA. WAY ATHOTTOM (SEE DWG.A3). NEW 1'-3" WIDE x 2"'.,. O" DEEP CONC. FOOTING Wt2 #4 BARS AT 811 O.C. AT TOP & BOTTOM (SEE DWG.A3). NEW 2'-0" WIDE x 5" THICK CONC. SLAB Wl6" x6" -#10 x#10 W.W.M. & 4" SAND FILL AT PLUMBING WALL (SEE DWG. A3). NEW 1'-0" WIDE x 12" DEEPCONC. FOOTING WI 1 #4 BARATTOP& BOTTOM (SEE DWG. A3). NEW318" CDX PLYWOOD (2410) SHEAR PANEL WI 8d AT 4" O.C. EDGE & 12" O.C. FIELD. [E) SIMPSON HD5A HOLDOWNWI SSTB20 ANCHOR BOLT (12 LOC.). (TI] EXIST. CONC. FOOTING. ~~ w 0) > ~ 0 ~ a:: 0 CL LL. :i :E ..J < -< 0 I-0 0 -~ c < w m :E ~ z w w LL. 0:: < 1-· :i 0 UI '<t CX) UI 0 Cl) N X .. 0) ~ Q. >< c3 olS w iii Ql (If C: u 1n 0 'i: ..c: ..c 5 0. u Ql. CX) '<t ~ .e; co Cl (") ~ I Ql N ::::J U) (") .. -~ t--~ :::, s Cl) co ..c t:, e ..-N <( LO ..- A'tex -~ z ~ 0. z ~ z ::::, 0 LL DATE: 1/30/02 (Rev. 7/8/02) DRAWN: DD PROJ.NO.: 0201 DWG.NO. 51 SH. 14 OF 30 I -I I "?Z I S7 ii1!JIJUL·~·: ! ~~ ~ ' I ,[I I 1,·:; m .. ·; ·1 ·,1 r1 m,111·~1 ,1: 1 §J i 1 ) 1,: 1·11! -i ~1r_1 t: . J ; :~+i R--1=~ = .1 i,~· !J ~.~ 1 , ,si.c.,1,, , 1 i' 1 ; , I .1 • ~ 1 r I I· I L i . ' , . . I ' i ;: . 11 I . ~ I ·-+--~ . ~. + OfE:1--l I , , I , 1 r~,r-~----=--==--I lj I 111 rilJ i i . n . , , I dJ ,r . . 71 ! .+-\fi;_cJ 1 ~ ii: , j ! j ~~: I : i I 'i, 'rs . --~ I f l1 Of!:;..! r;;i J.J __ _JI I ' I I w' ! 'I ~ . II 11--11 rr.JL \4+n--1ri ' I ; ' I ==1 10 ~ ~TflTI! ! ! 1Tcti-~1 ~-#o.' ~ ~-.Ci l ! I rrr-i'' r+:: 10 . j. ii i ! . i 1 ~ § . i I I ~i ·ij,. ·J· I ili~i+HI I 1.,L._. ,n: 51:-\~ ii' ·!1 ! ' i 1 1 11 ~ , __::_ (T\ -:r---J:11---------~1r ill '-Hol:'lll::::,.-+-; LJ-i ii', i-L:_s_~--5 3 --=cm·, . es· 1 I 13 ----• • 1-· \ ! I · : I ;~ « I till i»~ ! I : I . ' I ' ' ' . ~ I I \!1· ! [i'1 ! ! : I!! ii I ii I I _I___==--=-'-~' I l __ ;_l I i I FLOOR FRAMING PLAN SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" o z o·i I; l1PEN cv-i ' I W NEWWALL BELOW. [fl EXIST. WALL BELOW. [I) NEW 4" x 8" BEAM. SEE DETAILS 3/S7 & 4/S7. [§J EXIST. 4" DIA. PVC ROOF DRAINS. [IQ) NEW 1 1/2" x 11 7/8" MICROLAM RIM JOIST. [IT] NEW 4" x 12" P.T.D.F. LEDGER. [ill NEW 2" x 12" P.T.D.F. LEDGER. [TI) NEW 11 7/8" TJI/L65'S AT 16" o.c. [El NEW 3/4" T&G PLYWOOD. CT§] NEW 3/8" CDX PLYWOOD (24/0) SHEAR PANEL W/ 8d AT 4" 0.C. EDGE & 12" O.C. FIELD. I]]] NEW 4" x 12" BEAMW/ SIMPSON HUS410 BEAM HANGER AT EA. END. @:J DOUBLE TJl'S AT EA. END OF 4" x 12" BEAM. > !$ 0 z a: D! 0 0. LI. :e ..J ':::] -<( c3 I-0 0 z Q <C w <( ~ m z U) w ..J w LI. ~ I-::i Cl) '<:I' Cl) (X) G) 0 ... N ~ 0. 0) )( <( w () «>1S iii Jg Q) -~ C: C 5 0 .c .c: u 0. ~ (I) CX) -~ '<:I' ~ 0 co (') ::::, Q) N -.fg (') u r,... ~ C: :::J 0 .c en co ~ ..-t:::. N ll) ..- A'tex -~ z :3 D. (.!) z -~ ~ LL ~ 0 0 ..J LL DATE: 1/30/02 (Rev. 7/8/02) DRAWN: DD PROJ. NO.: 0201 DWG.NO. 52 SH. 15 OF 30 = ::1< ~ (j, -I i" ,-----'!zi7 ---}f---.. II' /~ ,I If f" ___ Y (JI I I . ·1 ,:i ''.:--'.!(.< j· :\/.I ~71 ~~7'--:?~ ------ 1:-;; i, . ·1· " I . ~(1;'· .. ·: ·<' -~ f' ' 6 I -I· . ~ . I. . . . I D •. -..,, I ·L--,---J . r<1 '>· PIPE BOLLARD SCALE: 1" = 1 '-0" ii-----------'~ ---· --~ .;---· ........ -----:..::_~-~----· ... ·-·~-~ -~' ~ L_-:t---t E~----,--'-,. ~-------+4 ll, .. · -.!I< rs b POST& BEAM SCALE: 1" = 1'-0" 13 fil---f F~ I I ~., ! . @.] ; \ \ \ 2 ~ .:::i st. : \: ; t---_L_ __ I ---1 I I I L __ _ HOLDOWN SCALE: 1" = 1'-0" --------.h ~-------i14 15 ±~,,~ ·\~ .. , \ 111 / J C. I ·.' ,\ ~ .t.> I l --, ----ti l (J KEYED NOTES DJ NEW 3/4" T&G PLYWOOD. [TI NEWT JI/L64'S AT 16" o.c. )~ [fl NEW SIMPSON ST6224 ~ STRAP AT SPLICE. . -m ~--*i I I Im NEW 7" x 11 7/8" PARALLAM BEAM. NEW SIMPSON PC84 OR EPC POST CAP. ADD ADDITIONAL STRAP AT J_j EPC POST CAP. (]] NEW 4" x 8" D.F. NO. 1 POST. [I] NEW 2" x 12" P.T.D.F. r---+---~ I j i------.-----~ LEDGER W/ 3/4" DIA x 6" QUIK-BOLTS AT 24" O.C. (ICBO #4016) & 5" TO 12" FROM ENDS. 0 I(. POST & BEAM SCALE: 1" = 1'-0" T! I]] NEW 5/8" DRYWALL. ---'------''-------t 5 l []J . EXIST. 6" CONG. TILT-UP WALL. ~ [ifil ITTI @] @] [HJ [TI@] I I O]J [ill NEW 2" x 14" BLOCKING' (RIP TO 11 7/8"). NEW SIMPSON A35'S AT 16" O.C. NEW 10d AT 6" O.C. NEW 2" x 4" P.T.D.F. W/ 1/2" DIA. X 5" QUIK- BOL TS AT 32" O.C. (ICBO #4016) & 5" TO 12" FROM ENDS. NEW DBL. 2" x 4" STUDS. NEW SIMPSON HD5A HOLDOWN. NEW CONG. FOOTING. NEW SIMPSON SSTB20 ANCHOR BOLT. 7 I [J]] -K II ~ I 1 EXIST. CONG. SLAB. EXIST. CONG. FOOTING. NEW 2" x P.T.D.F. WI 1/2" DIA. X 10 A.B. AT 48" O.C. I]]] -z. I 1201 rill I \ W§ CORE-DRILL 6" DIA. NEW 4" DIA. PIPE BOLLARD (PAINT SAFETY YELLOW). Cl :E N en w < > z 0 0:: tr: 0 LL. a. :::i :E ..I < -< 0 I-0 ci z c < < w m ::e !3 z w 0:: w LL. < ... :::i 0 "<t Ill CX) Ill 0 e N X 0) .I!! Q. <C >< ~ w (.) iii Jg Q) C: u rn 0 ·2 > .c: C. .c Q)-CX) u ~ > "<t ·c: co Q ("} e I Q) N- ::, rn ('I) .... ·c: t-,.. ~ C: 0 ::, (/) co .c t:::. 2 .-N <C lO .... A'tex -~ 0:: 0 en o ..J ..J -LL ~o WW o en ~ DATE: I i:: rn ~ § NEW 10" DIA. CONC. 1/30/02 (Rev. 7/8/02) · FOOTING. LEDGER DETAIL ~ SCALE: 1" = 1 '-0" ~ WELD 1/4" STEEL PLATE CAP AT TOP. WELD 1/4" DIA. EYELET FOR CHAIN. DRAWN: DD PROJ.NO.: 0201 DWG.NO. S6 SH. 19 OF 30 .. I 7 . i(i / ·~ \, [ID~ ----t::l . L.:J ln1 r1 ,-0 + rgJ I r-1 °' b, a b ··1000 c, I I I l:;?t1 [81 fSJ3'$i-, - I I t=. · .:-_--J a. a. ~ iSJ ~ ~/di . ~~. , jEx1tj ?-¥ 33, ' 7 c.::=::1 a. a. l\0~ b 13 J o~ JO avb,,1 l\~b 7 -. ·Cl b 1: 1~31 1//~ Ti ~~ C81 ,~//~] [SJ 0 -+ I.:: //b 1 I c./,,. ~ L-= d ! 0 ~ @ [SJ 0 ~ t2]. ~ l'L; '71 I (A ~ h ~-/·bi ~ ELECTRICAL PLAN -FIRST FLOOR SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0 z ·~ i=-==i ? b I> c:_:~_-:j ~ c·~ .-=r b Oil 11 11 ITO 7 __/ IT 1' [I) PROVIDE BACK- BOARD & REINSTALL EXIST. CONTROLS -- SEE DWGS. A3 & A4. [I) REINSTALL EXIST. WATER HEATER. [3J EXIST. LIGHT FIXTURE TO REMAIN (5 LOG.) .. [}J REINSTALL EXIST. LIGHT FIXTURE (3 LOG.) --SEE DWG. A3. (]] NEW 2' x 4' 2-TUBE SURFACE MOUNTEP LIGHT FIXTURE W/ PRISMATIC LENS & DUAL SWITCHING (24 LOG.). [I] NEW 2' x 4' 2-TUBE SURFACE MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE W/ PRISMATIC LENS (3 LOG.). (]] NEW 4' 2-TUBE SURFACE MOUNTED STRIP LIGHT W/ PRISMATIC WRAP- AROUND LENS (2 LOG.). I]] NEW SURFACE MOUNTED EXIT LIGHT ( 2 LOG.) --SEE DWG. A1, NOTE 10. (J]] NEW EXHAUST FAN (2 LOG.) --SEE DWG. M1. [TI] EXIST. ELECT. EQUIP. ROOM. [g] SUPPLY & RETURN AIR REGISTERS --SEE DWG.MI. D]) EMERGENCY EGRESS LIGHT FIXTURE. C0 UJ 0 0 :E N en UJ <C > z 0 0::: ~ 0 LL. c.. :::i :E -I <C -<C CJ I-CJ Q z i3 <C <C w m :i: ~ z w 0::: w u. <C I-:::i CJ -'<t Ill CX) ! 0 N X a, ~ 0. ~ >< o/S w iii .i Q) C: u u, 0 '2 5 .c a. .c Q)-CX) g > '<I' I-·c: (0 ~ 0 <'? Q) ~ :::, (/) -·c: t--s C: 0 :::, en (0 :c t::;. 2 ..-N <C I,() ..- A'tex -~ z :3 er:: ll. 0 ..JO <( ..J (.) LL -1-r:r:: u, I-er:: (.) -W LL ..J . w DATE: 1/30/02 (Rev. 7/8/02) DRAWN: DD PROJ. NO.: 0201 DWG.NO. E1 SH. 27 OF 30 ·· 1 I I I: I I ! I -"liJP1 I . I I 1•1 11 I I l I .. r I +i I I I 1+ : I 1T' ! I I i ; ; I I j I l :11~ 't€J l ' :~d ! 10tx I ~ I I I : I I I ! . i I , I (~//b 1 I ~ I 1 :! ~I I -"1 I~ 1~ 1 i i· , I i .,.:..--' ! 0. b /! " !»6 F ~ ' i----i--m j i ,__,_-.-,., 'Ht 1M I • I ' i i I l I I ' ' ~ ' II\ 1--1--1 I ',. 111 : I : I 1--1---;..i~I ~ ! ~-'----' i----f--+-1--""!:""-rl r-r--r-, '--'=='--::==' ·-----=+:--"""--· p~. . . I I I I I I I I l l I I I I Of'E::f-l U, : ---i------r-1~--.-~--:-----7------,-. . m~ f-1---1--r--:;,;-"-r-~ wi4-~-~r:-~r--+-~+--t---:::::::t---r~7't---1:r:-,~ 11. !4~~1--¥:::,_4-~~....;;+-re'"=i6~4--~-;.;-----1F.;,j----r-, ,, i [ f-; t---,k::4-----;--+----t-~--i------:---t-----r-----i----r 11 ! -,-.----;,r:::z:I!Sl: F.: ; ! _J.;;.,,,,~\--~;.,,,,,_'9r-:r· i ! I c: ---; w1..;;;;;.._...::.,__---,~-4--r--:----r-"'1----~.----,-____ j;;,__-4 --~ I I ! i ~M ' -- ----·- 1 j ELECTRICAL PLAN -SECOND FLOOR SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" -i- I l I I I I I 0 z ofet--1 I I . I I l I I 0 i 0---~ ;j~O ARCJ-;;.,-~~ KEYED NOTES ;>.,:,:,"f:\.\c A. o1-+; -·~'-2' _ IT] N~W ELECT. PANEL/(:;;' Q"t-. 0--t-\C;;_ \\\ B. 200 AMP, 40 1 f ( f'. 8371 , . - CIRCUITS, 3 PHASEJf-* . x-1 l * ! WIRE, 120-208 VAC. FEED FROM EXIST. MAIN SERVICE. I]] FURR-DOWN GRID CEILING AT HORIZ. ROOF DRAINS. IT] NEW 2' x 4' 3-TUBE DROP-IN LIGHT FIXTUREW/ PRISMATIC LENS & DUAL SWITCHING (40 LOC.). m NEW 2' x 4' 2-TUBE DROP-IN LIGHT FIXTUREW/ PRISMATIC LENS (1 LOC.). (]] NEW 4' 2-TUBE SURFACE MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE W/ PRISMATIC LENS (2 LOC.). W NEWSURFACE MOUNTED EXIT LIGHT ( 1 LOC.) --SEE DWG. A1, NOTE 10. [TI NEW SURFACE MOUNTED EXIT LIGHT W/ DIRECTIONAL ARROW ( 2 LOC.) -- SEE DWG. A 1, NOTE m 10. NEW CEILING MOUNTED EXIT LIGHT ( 1 LOG.) -SEE DWG. A1, NOTE 10. [I] NEW WALL MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE (1 LOC.). [IQ) NEW EXHAUST FAN (2 LOC.) --SEE DWG. M1. OJ] EXIST. TJl'S AT 8'-0" O.C. (ill SUPPLY & RETURN AIR REGISTERS -- SEE DWG. M2. (ill EMERGENCY EGRESS LIGHT FIXTURE. :!!: w > ·O a:= 0.. :!!: ..J -~ I-c z c < c( w m ~ "' z ..J w w c:: LI. ~ I-:::i - """ Ill <X) Ill 0 e N X O> Q. tj ,l!! )( cl:! w iii ,:r;J-Q) C: u ti 0 ·2 5 .c .c C. i Q)-<X) > '<t I-·c: <O ! Cl M I Q) N ::J (/) M -·;:: I'--u C: 0 s :::, :E rn <O E ..... t:::. N <( ll) ..... A'tex -~ z <t ~ ..J 0 D. 0 ..J ..J <t LL oc -z f= 0 00 WW ..J UJ w DATE: 1/30/02.(Rev. 7/8/02) DRAWN: DD PROJ.NO.: 0201 DWG.NO. E2 SH. 28 OF 30