Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1949 KELLOGG AVE; ; CB951811; Permit(1/e-#-sas-o PERMIT .APPUCATION City of Carlsbad Building Departaent 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 F.S'f. VAL:......=~=-,f-.....,.=."""""---:;--.---,,.,, 1. PERMIT TYPE PLANCKD VAIID.BY-.--,,t-=.-.,__.,..-_____ _ From Llst 1 (see back) give code of Permit-Type: ___________ _ DATE. __ ._.=-1-'-1,-1-"f-f_;;... ____ _ For Residential Projects Only: From Llst 2 (see back) give Code-of Structure-Type: _.::;:;Ta.:Vl...;.;:11,.._ ______________ _ 5106 12/.1.1/~95 OC-01 ti. 02 C-F'RMT Net Loss/Gain of Dwelling Units __________________ _ 2. PRQJECI' INFORMATION FOR OFFICE USE ONLY mt o. 2- ADDRESS ADDRESS t..{2,5 y_J. &ctd~c...ya iJe _ --,:F-{!; CI1Y ZIP CODE .. '2-diC DAY TELEPHONE <..{L(i ~ z q ;;)-- NAME (last name first) V [)DJ / f2.4-tj , Gh f'U'fJi ~ 5q45 fa C!.[J,c/C.. C-tf2, f5/ Vd t5TE,' 5()5'" CI1Y 6a-6ft. Qit_so STATE Cli. ZIP CODE qv2-1 DAY TELEPHONE sLJ& -sB99 CI1Y loS I Workers' Compensaaon Oedarauon: I hereby afhrm that I have a ceruhcate of consent to self-msure issued by the Director of lndustnal Relations, or a certificate of Workers' Compensation Insurance by an admitted insurer, or an exact copy or duplicate thereof certified by the Director of the insurer thereof filed with the Building Inspection Department (Secti3'. 3800, Lab. C). INSURAN COMPANY Ll f;; H POUCY NO£--, lo/ ~d;iJ -5~1~~~ DATE I "Z--0{ -q D D t] ere y a 1rm a am exemp rom e ontrac o s cense w or e o owmg reason: I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the bµilding or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose-of sale.). I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed c~mtractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's Licenser.aw does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's license Law}. I am exempt under Section _______ Business and Professions Code for this reason: (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish, or repair any structure, prior to.its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the·Contractor's · w (Chapter 9, commencing with Section 7000-of Division 3 of the ~usiness and Professions Code) or that he is exempt ther m, and tli sis for e alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit s · ant t a ci · I ~ t than five hundred dollars [$5001). DATE the, 1c1mt or future buildin cu pant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous·materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous SubJ;tance Account Act? a~ ooo / Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution central district or air quality management district? 0 YES ONO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? 0 YES ONO IF ANY OF nm ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF oa:uPANCY MAY Nor BE Il?SlJED AFl'ER JULY 1, 1989 UNLFSS nm APPUCANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING nm REQUIREMENTS OF nm OFflCE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND nm !\IR POU.UTION OONTilOL DISllUCT. 9. UJNS'IRUCliON U:NDING AGENCY I hereby afhrm that there 1s a construction lendmg agency for the performance of the work for which this permit 1s issued (Sec 3097(1) C1V11 Code). LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS to. APP.I.JCAN I CER:11FiC2rnON I cerafy that I have read the apphcaaon and state that the above mformat1on 1s correct. I agree to comply with all City ordmances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of-the City of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE 10 SAVE INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMI.FSS nm CITY OF CARISBAD AGAINSf AIL UABillTIES, JUDGMENTS, CDSTS AND EXPENSF..'i WlllCH MAY IN ANY WAY Aa:RUE AGAINSf SAID CITY IN OONSEQUENCE OF nm GRANTING OF 1lilS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. PINK: Finance S E W E R P E R M I T 03/j,2/96 14~56. Page 1 of 1 Job Address: 1949 KELLOGG AV Permit Type: SEWER -OFFICE/WAREHOUSE ~arcel No: 212-092-68--00 · Suite: Description: 21,964 SF TILTtJP-5850 OFFICE, : 16112 WHSE/MANUFAC.DOMINEE.PRESS fPermitee: KEN SMITH ARCHITECTS 435. W BRADLY AV #6 EL CAJON, CA 92020 e·19-44_4-21e2. . CITY OF CARLSBAD; . Permit No: SE950139 ~l~g Pl~nCk#: °CB951811 6463 03/12/96 0001 .01. 02 C-PRMT 12177.C<O Status: ISSUED· . Applied! 12/22/~5 . Apr/Issue: 03./12/96 Expired: Prepared By: M.lkt~ 2075 µs Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA92009 (619) 438-1161 · CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECT·ION REQUEST PERMIT# ·CB951811 FOR 09/30/96 DESCRIPTION: 21,964 SF TILTUP-5850 OFFICE, 16463 SF WHS/MANUF-DOMINEE PRESS TYPE: INDUST STE: INSPECTOR AREA TP PLANCK# CB951811 OCC GRP B-1/B-2 CONSTR. TYPE VN LOT: JOB ADDRESS: 1949 KELLOGG AV APPLICANT: KEN SMITH ARCHITECTS CONTRACTOR: PHONE: 619-444-2182 OWNER: REMARKS: MW/GIL/520-1412 SPECIAL INSTRUCT: TOTAL TIME: --RELATED PERMITS--PERMIT# SE950139 AS960058 FAD96029 RW960089 TYPE swow ASTI FADD ROW PHONE: PHONE: STATUS ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED CD LVL DESCRIPTION ACT COMMENTS 19 $T Final Structural 29 PL Final Plumbing 39 EL Final Electrical 49 ME Final Mechanical .,a/ /2{/CPo/~ Cez,,f. ·t--- ------,..--------------- ---------------------------------------------- ***** INSPECTION HISTORY***** DATE · DESCRIPTION 091896 Final Combo 091796 Ftame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 091696 Compliance Investigation 091096 Rough Electric 082196 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 082096 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 082096 Rough Electric 082096 Rough/Ducts/Dampers 080996 Interior Lath/Drywall 080296 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 072596 Compliance Investigation 072496 Const. Service/Agricultural 071796 Steel/Bond Beam 070896 Interior· Lath/Drywall 070296 Interior Lath/Drywall 070196 Interior Lath/Drywall 062796 Interior Lath/Drywall 062496 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 062496 Rough/Topout 062496 Rough Electric 062196 Insulation 062196 Interior Lath/Drywall 062196 Interior Lath/Drywall ACT INSP CO TP CA PD CI PK AP TP PI TP AP TP AP TP AP TP AP TP AP PD PI TP AP TP AP r:t'P AP TP PI TP PA TP- PI TP AP TP AP TP· AP TP CA PKJ CA PKJ CA ~4 COMMENTS FIRE APR,LOBBY STAIRS H-RAILS BY GIL WANTED TO TALK MAIN & SUB PNLS T-BAR@ ENT CEIL LITES@ ENT DUCTS@ ENT @ ENTRY AT STAIRS CONFERENCE SEO CLEARANCE SCREEN WALL & SIGN PNLS COMPLETE QUESTIONS W.H.&T.D.HIGH WALLS FULL HT WALLS WALLS BY GIL IN FIELD BY GIL IN FIELD BY GIL IN FIELD ' •. ,;I CI~Y OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT# CB951811 FOR 09/30/96 DESCRIPTION: 21,964 SF TILTUP-5850 OFFICE, 16463 SF WHS/MANUF-DOMINEE PRESS ~YPE: INOUST JOB ADDRESS: 1949 KELLOGG AV STE: INSPECTOR AREA TP PLANCK# CB951811 OCC GRP B-1/B-2 CONSTR. TYPE VN LOT: ***** INSPECTION HISTORY***** DATE 061996 0.61896 061896 061896 061896 061396 061296 061196 0611.96 060596 060496 0603'96 053196 052196 052196 052096 0'51496 042396 041796' 041696 032896 032796 032696 032096 DESCRIPTION , Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding RoUgh/Topout Rough E;:lectric Rough/Ducts/Dampers Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundat;l.on/Piers Shear Panels/HD's .Retaining Walls Footing Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Roof/Rer.oof Ftg/Foundation/Piers Roof/Reroof Ftg/Foundation/Piers Shear Panels/HD's Ftg/Foundation/Piers ·Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers ACT INSP CO TP CO TP CO TP CO TP CO TP CO TP AP TP AP TP AP TP AP TP AP TP PA TP AP PK AP TP AP TP CA TP AP TP AP TP AP TP PI TP AP TP AP TP AP TP AP TP COMMENTS TOP TRACK ASMB REV TOP TRACK ASMB@ ROOF POUR STRIP@ SHEAR P.S. @·TRK DOCK DBL SHEAR@ INT WALLS (2) TRK DOCK WALLS TRK DOCK WALLS INT SHEAR WALLS FLR NLNG DRY PACK@ CLMNS P.S. & TSH ENCL FTNGS STACK PANELS PANELS POUR STRIP SLAB COMPLETE WEST SLAB AREA CENTER SLAB ONLY *EXT. FTNS,INT PIERS,G.3 MEZ FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION DEPT: BUILDING FIRE PLANNING U/M WATER PLAN CHECK#: CB951.811 PERMIT#: CB951811 DATE: 09/23/96 PERMIT TYPE: INDUST PROJECT NAME: 21,964 SF TILTUP-5850 OFFICE, -----~.~~~ 16463 SF WHS/MANUF-DOMINEE PRESS ADDRESS:. 1949 KELLOGG A:V Lot# CONTACT PERSON/PHONE#: GIL/970-3977 SEWER DIST: CA WATER DIST: CA .INSPECTED -~ ~~~~ECTED: 9/&S/96 BY: APPROVED INSPECTED DATE BY.: INSPECTED: APJ;>ROVED INSPECTED DATE BY: INSPECTED: APPROVED RECErrv;s:.i [~2~1~ j clfio°F=D~R-:SS:\o HJG!NEERlNG DEPARTiVENT / DISAPPROVED DISAPPROVED DISAPPROVED ==== .=====: -======= -====-==== ---------· -----------------------------=========== COMMENTS: DEPT: · BUILDING FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION ENGINEERING C~tR~ • . .i P!ANNING U/M WATER PLAN CHECK#: CB951811 PERMIT#:· CB95181.1 PROJECT NAME: 21,964 SF TILTUP-585CJ OFFI.CE, 16463 SF WHS/MANUFtOOMINE _PRg~1 CONTACT PE~SON/PHONE#: GIL/970-3977 SEWER DIST: CA WATER DIST: CA INSPECTED · BY: th-.~ p INSPECTED BY: INSPECTED BY: COMMENTS: DATE ~ INSPECTED: DATE INSPECTED: DATE INE;PECTED: Lo.t# APPROVED APPROVED APPROVED DATE: 09/23/96 PERMIT TYPE: INDUST t'3y --- DISAPPROVED DISAPPROVED DISAPPROVED FINAL EUILDING INSPECTION DEPT: BUILDING ENGINEERING FIRE ~p"l:;IDUr~ U /M WATER PLAN .CHECK#: CB951811 PERMIT#: CB951811 PROJECT NAME: 21,964 SF TILTUP-5850 OFFICE, 16463 SF WHS/MANU;F'-DQMINEE'."-PREss·-~ ADDRESS : t:_~9-~ff)~~KELLOGG AV ~ ~-, Lot# CONTACT PERSON/PHONE#: GIL/970-3977 SEWER DIST: CA WATER DIST: CA, DATE: 09/23/96 PERMIT TYPE: INDUST ._BINY~. P:~~--~-,-J. I_. DATE ~ '~NSPECTED: 1</<J-U APPROVED V DISAPPROV~D _ INSPECTED -DATE BY: INSPECTED: INSPECTED BY: COMMENTS: DATE I-NSPECTED: APPROVED DISAPPROVED APPROVED DISAPPROVED FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION DEPT: BUILDING ENGINEERING FIRE PLANNING U/M PLAN CHECK#: CB951811 PERMIT#: CB95181i PROJECT NAME-: 21,964 SF TILTUP-5850 OFFICE, 16463 SF WHS/MANUF-DOMINEE PRESS ADDRESS: 1949 KELLOGG AV CONTACT PERSON/PHONE#: GIL/970-3977 SEWER DIST: CA WATER DIST: CA Lot# WATER DATE: 09/23/96 PERMIT TYPE: INDUST INSPECTED · ~ B'Af~~ . ,~ BY:#~.; --:PECTED: j'~f'Xfi:J}PPROVED~ DISAPPROVED_ INSPECTED DATE . BY:-----'---------INSPECTED: ______ APPROVED DISAPPROVED INSPECTED BY: COMMENTS: D,ATE INSPECTED: APPROVED DISAPPROVED \ FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION DEPT: BUI:µDING ENGINEERING FIRE PLANNING U/M l:;W~TE;R: · 1 PLAN CHECK#: CB951811 DATE: 09/23/96 PERMIT#: CB951811 n~~~;:J;i~TJ-PET INDUST PROJECT NAME: 21,964 SF TILTtJP-5850 OFFICE, fi.t\!o1'~-·~·~.:'----.-, 16463 SF WHS/MANUF-QO:t,iilrE$-·PREss~·L,oA t• -;; 3 1996 •.. \ ADDRESS: C~-~:49 KELLOGG AV :. 1t CONTACT PERSON/PHONE#: GIL/970-3977 i LcifTEfi:.;·---.~;~"·.-r'_ SEWER DIST: CA WATER DIST: CA JJ:ll;'ltLg£1)i,!G r0:..(.~~-~~---· INSPECTED~ BY: INSPECTED BY: INSPECTED BY: COMMENTS: DATE INSPECTED: DATE INSPECTED: DATE- INSPECTED: 1/2!/9'/; APPROVED z DISAPPROVED APPROVED DISAPPROVED APPROVED DISAPPROVED JUNE 25, 1996 -MONTANA 2992 E. La Palma, Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 Testing & Geotechnical, Inc. 888 Rancheros Dr., Suite E San Marcos, CA 92069 Tel: (619) 735-5060 Fax: (619) 735-8979 Hamann Construction 475 West Bradley Avenue El Cajon, CA 92020 Project No: 2943-014 Log No: 6-1740 ATTN: Mr. James Graves :RE: SATISFACTORY COMPLETION OF THE WORK REQUIRlNG SPECIAL INSPECTION PERFORMED UNDER PERl\flT NO. 95-1881 RE: DOMINIE PRESS OFFICE BUU..DING \19A9.:-Kell~enue,-Gar-lsbacl,CA1. ATTN: Mr Graves: To the best of my knowledge, all of the work requiring special inspection, testing, and construction observation for the suucture constructed under the subject permit is essentially in conformance with the approved plans, specifications and the applicable workmanship provisions of the Uniform Building Code. ·· ·· · · -·-· .. the types· and dates of special Inspections are listed below: REINFORCED CONCRETE INSPECTION APRIL 16, 18, 23, 1996 SITE STRUCTURAL STEEL MAY 1-2, 6, 17, 1996 If you should have any questions concerning this report, please contact me. Douglas Hitchingham -Senior ~terials Enginee R2HENGINEERING INC. MEMBER - 2992 E. La Palma, Suite A Anaheim, California 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 MONTANA T-esting & Geotechnical, Inc. FIELD REPORT 888 Rancheros Drive, Suite E San Marcos, California 92069 Tel: (619) 735-5060 Fax: (619) 735-8979 COVERING WORK FOR AVAILABLE: SOIL REPORT (Y) (N) SPECS(O:J)N) F,·e.\cl We.ld 1:ns-pee,tio ..... APPROVED PLAN€7vi):N) APPROVED SHOP DRAWING@(N) ARCHITECT k' e t\ ne4-1-\ '\) , S tr.~"" ~ A S'SOC, FOR WEEK ENDINGS -1,-9{o IPRJ.2Cf43014 -ENGINEER ~ -z. H en ~ineel"'·ll'l'-\ Inc.. REPORT NO. -------PG J OF I CONTRACTOR ., PLAN FILE NO. IPERMITNO, 9 51 -B I I H-°'MQ.r\r\ Co'ns-f-, -NA- SUB-CONTRACTOR Sou+'~ -s~"\ PROJECT NAME Do\"ninie "Pre.,s W~ldi\?~ INSPECTION ADDRESS ADDRESS OF PROJECl' \ C-t 4 q ~e \\09 ~ A~) CQ-r\.sbC\cl· rrct + q-1< c no~'!> -A~ Cqf'l.sb~ REPORTING REQUIREMENTS: ICilO FIELD INSPECTION MANUAL/ MTG SOIL MANUAL MATERIALS USED (TEST REPORTS): 5-t 'f IJC.i'\1-t"~ l S+ee\ ! As,m A"?>to-, I \,J c..ld irij e.lecmJ...t. :Aws 61018 Cer .\: i+i {.d w ~\~ ~. 5Qu\ '1<odr-i9~e"?:. il q3-zasc ES*J: EQUIPMENT/MANPOWER USED: A $TIV\ A ~ -z.. S °?fl~'' l5l \.\ SB L'1ncol~ Arc, w etd"'. ITEMS OBSERVED (DETAIL NOS.): we.loin~ 0 ~ '("6of Stt'CI ps pL\ S.\-ru<,\v..-4 \ 6~ ~,hfe,r s~ O" H~c\ 4-I S'-~4 ~e.ldiri~ 0~ 'oeG\'"" e~ !> °?"' 5\--ru o\,-i°" \ t.vt'!)'l~eer SW~ 0.1'\0, s ~'"' ' LOCATION OF WORK: Hi.e>\o\ s+c~~"' l>o ~i~, \))'II'\~ ~n~1C'\ ~t-· bo 1\-..s ~ \un~ \\ 'AA. t:> ~raw-. \-hi., , ~oo.f s+rc.-p t,Je,lQ'l~~Q.+ , ~jUl\j ~T (?c::\5~ t-o~ td~ heC.r Ce.1'1\-CA. ~"'d n-3,3 · Becun ~ndi ~\~\~ +o \.-,e~{,.,..~ ~gkS !:!Ii: v.)91\ 4op · E.• S -"2.. REMARKS, INCLUDING MEETINGS: ~t +ensi9'\ o {' A 3 -z.s 1-i~e, ~ \)f> ~ I ) :l,,n~-\ -O-e.1c} ~elJ ;"'~ 'f¼' Aw'!: Dl-1 $:l:~CJWY'Clj WC, \d j),, ~ C{J k. -w e..l ~·V\~ p:£.r-±or.m.<.~ ~¥ C~r.\-1 :fi:td Wj\l~, kl Ort -k}\)V\ di ~C!C.t.¢:c.\i\.t.. ~o q~f2r"C:.)M.cl ~~""~ ~Y\~ -S.\-r1Jc.i-\-urq\ f.in%in-e.Q.("' modi fi CDliiOl~. SAMPLES lAKEN Nh WEATHER: s 'UYl"'r TESTS REQUIRED I\\A DEFICIENCIES CLEARED: h.l>N. UNCORRECTED DEFICIENCIES, MISSING RFI / CO, ADDITIONAL TESTS REQUIRED: }"\ ll l'-l ( \.H"\Q blc.. +11 \C'Y',..J,,, S (J D-f:.) ' ,_ TIME:START: ··J2,ie, r.'J "'-· TIME FINISH:· 4Qsl·o,~ ...... ~·-o-AUTHORIZED BY: · -,, ' · ' I hereby_ certify that I have observed the work listed above and that it complies with the soil investigation recommendations, and / or the approved plans, specifications.and .applica~le ~ections of-the building code, unless otherwise_ noted. . -·· , . ~£-~n,1 ~0. s Signature '1;:,cK S-1<\e~~r Print Name t 11 /199&. Date of Report .:z:c .B 0 Si 3S8 Certification Number St-,"~\ Ste~\ ~ .. a vJe..\ c1 i "'j Rev: 5/95 t ·t . 2992 E. la Palma, Suite A Anaheim, .California 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 fax: (714) 632-2974 COVERING W2RK FOR . _ \ \ . .$,-+s Wte ~\N ARCHITECT~ D s -L. "-'•. . ""''' -MONTANA Testing & Geotechnical, Inc. FIELD REPORT ·AVAILABLE: SOIL REPORT (Y) (N) , APPROVED PLANS M1Nf FO.!jj'EEK ENDING a / Fr/JI, /2,, /77,- 888 Rancheros Drive, Suite E San Marcos, California 92069 Tel: (619) 735-5060 Fax: (619) 735-8979 ,ENGINEER REPORT NO. -z_.. PG / OF I PLAN FILE NO. ADDRESS OF PROJECT 'l'i /~//..,_ ' Iii/. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS: ICBO FIELD INSPECTION MANUAL/ MTG .SOIL MANUAL MATERIALS USED (TEST REPORTS): EQUIPMENT/MANPOWER USED: z . J I j . . {A./ s 10I/;;es ITEMS OBSERVED (DETAIL NOS.): WEATHER: ~""~u'f ~D's ~/( Print Name· SAMPLES TAKEN TESTS REQUIRED TIME-FINISH:/.~· _ · •· · /JJl'fT I. ~ /199" .:iiate of Report <-~05/01/1996 13:45 6196738418 R2H ENGINEERING • ,. -1 -du, R2H Engineering, Inc._ ~ P~OJECT OA1INlS ~ BY q2<,I. S~BJECT ~ ~ · J?AitS -···. ··-M . ·-· ...... -,, ~ l I ll\ , -- ~ . b . , , ~ -~i I I-,-, ' . ..... ·+ i ·--~ ~ ~ ,, , ,~i 11 ,_.I C .. -~ ~ ' ~ ~~ ~ • ! ',. R ~ ,1! 1-1 Q --~ ~ ~ !~ + ,J \ ~rt\ 11 ~ x1~ u : -i ! ~ '\.~ II (;;) -, -&-, '-~ . . ,, J~ +-' 11 I l ·-~-t'-.., ::::: -=l" ~ 3 ~ 0-.... ~ ~ --~ 1 ;l .... +·' ~ 9. + ; +· i • S) J +· ,, ~--- Poet-tt.-Fax Note 1671 PAGE 01 JOB NO. &0,5 .. ozo DATE 5/qt;.. __ SHEET __ a;}_ OF- -~ i ~ \.) ~~ ~ l-' ~ ~ t{ i Cl,'? ~05/01/1996 13:45 6196738418 R2H ENGINEERING PROJECT~::!:!!!.~~~~------------ BY~ . SUBJECT --····· .. -.. -·-••J' -..... .._.. .. --· ·-... ....... .• ,. .. . --... . .. . --.. :-· ~ .. • .... . . . --···-.... .; ... ·. .. .... . .. ·-... . . .. ·.·.:~ : ·. .. . ·_ · 11ir. .·.rJf ---·-~ ~·'" .,. -· ...... » • .... • • ••• ·-• • •••••• PAGE 02 · JOB NO. DATE Si'qG SHEET C-4-4 OF-- ~15i1'::.l':lb. 1':,:1:.:: bl ':lb,-.;:'.::)41 :::: PAGE R 2H Engineering, Inc. JOB NO. (;9'.Ji t7W DATE __ 7'f? ~'-FL ~eGI? ~ea oe-r.c.1-(.. 4-/ri. I lfxAr:G .~ r:z o.lJ~ ~ f(.) , "' ~ ~ ~ ~ •, ... PROJECT _,__£):;;i.{_tNI~. ~~---=-=-c_.::._, _1,__. __ _ SUBJECT __ /'.t:;Vl:5€0 .De1At~ 2'/~4 SHEEi ___ QF_ I 1' r1tfC~······ I ,.;:--:,.~---. ;,--;;::-:-,.-,, ·....___ "".....__.._. j . t:JF p..,;?...J..J .. · _ .. ··, ~ ~-~ v· r ?/4-lt,.,., /.Jlt,-, llt.v1~ Hl'----==.:lt===:::.::.--t -/;.-... f;,ol-:;-I I , 6S& ---...::!-----'-----ill--,--~· 1/z" ,2..; ~w · t:=ct.... /3,,!,(..,, r· · .. --....-.--I-'------.---------.sp~,JG,:, ~ ~ ~~i_. -+--CT- ' i I r ! 1 ! · . ·· A, f MJ!3':L -15 ....... ·-·-·---·· .. ,1'/0t&: P~ WN. N~ :'::~/OWN t<,.r.:. 4--v_>: ½ .. ,;,_X 17..,, oJr u;;J6 :::.a .JT~ OJ 'f'_J~-L;.Jr-..,! . ·-... ·-··----------·· ..... - . ... . .............. ,, _______ -[ .. ·----,------· ......... .,, __ , .. ··-·· -·--·---/7/·-:-~-.-. -~~-~ -..... ~ ·---·------v'---"·I--. . --·· ~-·--··--+-----.... ··-· .... -... . -.. . . ·---·---~----·-"·--·····-·' 04/15/1896 15:13 5195738418 R2H ENGINEERING R2H Engineering, Inc. SY ? UYM. PROJECT_, 'lJ?.!!:1/Allt:5__.PA_e_B_~_?""_~---- A .. • . • SUBJECT_ /2£;J/{3a:) C,€1A1c_,. 3 l~lS ;4 1 . . $74a, ~AVe:L ,ii --z._ . ..--------------------,---- 31''2:;f,c;-r' .,. ~ Zt-c, v1 1\br ,"-.lore?.o I :ftrL re, . &Mt5eV ~ p...f!'- F/.ZMG>, FLAN~ C,£:cAi,J t,;J>.) 7/'-'· f;:,l,,/e££) ~JieTAtt... 4--/:,":;l:2--~ <it.. t.-. otJ ,,-1_€ .) ~ \\ ,, I JOB NO .. c_CJf;-Z)Jc OAiE L:J-/q6 ' SHEET-~-' OF----._ <€ c~ 4--x:4-. --~ .· ' i /I -'f-· ---,- ·---..._ 1~< U::c-6erL . ::.u I 3i-1411-P H1 m k£!!,L g6($ ,J.,f/,v. S /I' 6/,,fe-€cMetv1· 5:eE ?/5/4' ~ SCk,/N,S ·-· ..... _ ! .. .,_ . ... .. -··· · ........... - ---··---[ CL~ I •• ·-I BY ..,. '()Y(:rA. . ;, I ...,....._, -v :Sr.L ;e . ~ I . 6M6t!:P ....__ -I -@~~-<:".", JOB NO. C9'9 o~ DATE_ 4-_/q~ ·-- SHEET-~-OF-- ?::14-11(; Hn.:17 .5 "' 64 t:8::J.1e /Ji . ..,: ___ -...:i,_~--. ·-. __ _ ·' ... :..... ... N. ··-- --·~-- -7~1 ·-~--........... ~ ... -... -··-, .. :--··-·-·.-.. \•. 2992 E. La Palma,. SuUe A Ana~eim, California 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 MO·NTANA Testing & Geotechnical, Inc. Fax: (714) 632-i974 FIELD REPORT COVERING WORK FOR h i. , re Jo,-AVAILABLE: SOIL REPORT.(Y) (N) C,, .ec-14'1_({ APPROVED PLANS ~ (N) ARCHITECT K . .D. .sh-\\ t{ . A-s~oc-. . FOR WEEK ENDING '/ ''It ~ S--I. - ENGINEER R2-K z..~. ~-REPORT ND. CONTRACTOR \-+~W\~~ Ctn.r.-11 -& . PLAN FILE NO. t'Y\. -·sue-CONTRACTOR PROJECT NAME t.;: s' fl, - 888 Rancheros Drive, Suite E San Marcos, California 92069 Tel: (619) 735-5060 Fax: (619) 735-8979 SPECS (Y) (N) APPROVED SHOP DRAWINGS (Y) (NJ IPRJ. NO. ~q I/ 8 -0 2.-o PG I Of I (ERMIT Noq s 1 71 er . of,4;e Cd>ry:J /4 ~ INSPECTION ADDRESS ADDRE_SS OF PROJECT /{e4)T:rn ~4-. Certs~ 6e:tm~ .S-'9 /0 REPORTING REQUIREMENTS: iCBO FIELD INSPECTION MANUAL/ MTG SOIL MANUAL . MATERIALS USED (TEST REPORTS): EQUIPMENT/MANPOWER USED: ITEMS OBSERVED (DETAIL NOS.): LOCATION OF WORK: REMARKS, INCLUDING MEETINGS: <a:) . • n • r . , () . • j g n · . . l t:: o '.Vle.leJ ~ '° r~ ~ ~ ';4'*' "'1e c '-«-,:;. t;,_'-f ~ De,_'(. ~ WEATHER: ~, {/J '1.rY>') , DEFICIENCIES CLEARED: ,/' UNCORRECTED DEFICIENCIES, MISSING RFI / CO, ADDITIONAL TESTS REQUIRED: SAMPLES lAKEN -1,I:) 1 TESTS REQUIRED /JJ tJ, -_,, TIME START: 0 : 9 d O TIME FINISH: //.' '" . AUTHORIZED BY: '711-./'/I F~ , ---, ..,. ~ I hereby certify that I have observed the work listed above and that it complies with the soil investigation recommendations, and / or the approved plans, specifications and applicable sections of the building code, unless otherwise noted. nature~ ,4., & . . 'f-/41/ct nc/er Print N·ame / S-I It> 1:199( Date of Report ~.3bf{ ~ 1-s. J) Certification ~r ~ Rev: 5/95 MONTANA 2992 E. La Palma, Suite A · Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 REPORT OF CYLINDER TEST~ Testing & Geotechnical, Inc. 888 Rancheros Dr., Suite E San Marcos, CA 92069 Tel: (619) 735-5060 Fax: (619) 735-8979 PROJECT NO. 2943-14 CITY OF CARLSBAD-BCDG. INSPECYION DEPT. 2075 LAS PALMAS PROJECT NAM~(JJ•U.,hLL!:;:,...12,l:ii;E..::~f~E CARLSBAD, CA 92009 CLIENT:l·-lhMANN CONSTRUCT I ON SET:2O83 AGE DATE NOt.,INAL LAB NUMBER (DAYS) SIZE A -, I {.;pr .... ,r.: .. .:::..:, 6X12 B 28 May :l E, 6X12 i-· -· :28 M.::1.y 1.6 6X12 HD :28 May 16 SPECIFIED STRENG~.Cu;m LOCATION PANEL ,j:j:5 PSI CASTBYI)D CONCRETE SUPPLIER NEL.E\ON I SLOAN MIX NO. !SS:2 TYPE OF CEMENT TICKET N.OSE:.,()76 ';) MIXING TIME C::-"7 -..JI MIN WATER ADDED AT SITE i () GhLLONS AUTHORIZED BY PUMP f: . DR I l/EF.: SLUMP 3 " !.5 IN REMARKS DISTRl!3UTION ( 4-) HAMhNN CONSTRUCTION KEN SMITH ARCHITECTURE 1:;;::2H ENG I NEEF.: I NG Cl'T\fl:iQ'.f!:1,': ,c;~~LSI:-U-H>-E<L.DG. INSPECTION DEPT.·,· BUILDING PROJECT ADD~~:ARU3Bt'iD BP/OSA NO. PLAN FILE NO. ACTUAL AREA LOAD (SQ. IN.) (LBS) :28 II s::~E, t~ 15()() :28.46 l(i:35<)() STRENGTH (PSI) 286~3 ~H;:3E1 :;;;:811 .:.1.fS 1. l ~::::=;c) r-§ '9'21) ~-~ -· o.oo DATE RECEIVED AIR % UNIT WEIGHT PCF CONCRETE TEMP 7"::) o F AMBIENT TEMP (=:_,·7 Of ADMIXTURES Respectfully Submitted, TYPE OF FRACTURE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH: · CONFORMS DOES NOT CONFORM D ,.., MONTANA 2992 E. La Palma, Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 REPORT OF CYLINDER TESTS Testing & Geotechnical, Inc. 888 Rancheros Dr., Suite E San Marcos, CA 92069 Tel: (619) 735-5060 Fax: (619) 735-8979 PROJECT NO. 2'34 3-· 14 CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDGP INSPECTION DEPT. 2075 U.':%S PALMt-:iS PROJECT NAM~)Oizj:i'.:.fF.FE=!~f-'o::it.~rtfH-f&i::: CARLSBAD, CA 92009 CLIENT:HAMANN CONSTF.:UCT I ON ~.ET2084 AGE DATE NOMINAL LAB NUMBER (DAYS) SIZE A 7 Apr ::;::5 6X1.2 B 28 May 1 E, 6X12 C 28 May 16 E,Xl:;;: HD 28 May 1 E, SPECIFIED STR~T~-<~B!~ PSI CAST"BYDD CONCRETE.SUPPLiER NE:LSON / SLOAN MIX NO. 5 ~54 "TYPE OF CEMENT TICKET N°:5f,OB04 MIXING TIME 73 MIN WATER ADDED AT SITE AUTHORIZED BY SLUMP 4.0 IN REMARKS DISTRIBUTION ( .::j. ) HAMANN CONSTRUCTION KEN $MITH ARCHITECTURE BUILDING PROJECT ADD~::(.:iJ:;;: U:3 BAD BP/OSA NO. PLAN FILE NO. ACTUAL AREA LOAD (SQ. IN.) (LBS) 28.46 7E,!::;oo 28.46 1 (l~~-75<) STRENGTH (PSI) :.:::6t:::8 3610 2f.3" 4-E.1 l O':.H)OO --~ ~=~}@~.(l 0.00 TYPE OF FRACTURE ON,36.Apr.18 DATE RECEIVED •=• ~ -~ -. . 1 ,-·1 ::.-C.• u r·i 1 ..• 1 r n _ :~ AIR UNIT WEIGHT CONCRETE TEMP AMBIENT TEMP ADMIXTURES Respectfully Submitted, % PCF OF OF CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG. INSPECTION DEP~~~~ COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH: DOE 96 .. May.1.6 M-ONTANA -2992 E. La Palma, Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (-714) 632-2974 REPORT OF CYLINDER TESTS Testing & Geotechnical, Inc. 888 Rancheros Dr., Suite E San Marcos, CA 92069 Tel: (619) 735-5060 Fax: (619) 735-8979 PROJECT NO. 2943-· i 4 CITY OF CP1F.:LSBAD-BLDG .. INSPECTION DEPT. 2075 .LAS PALMPIS PROJECT NAM~~'1"f"j\:r,[~~'S'"=fJf~CE CARLSBAD, CA 92009 CUEN~HAMANN CONSTRUCTION SET2i)85 AGE DATE NOMINAL LAB NUMBl;R (DAYS) SIZE A 7 Apr-.-,c::-.,;:.,J 6X12 B 28 May 16 6X1:2 r· -· 28 May j ~ . t~· E,X12 HD 28 MB.y 16 SPECIFIED STRENG:r:H·-:::ffl1ii''J PSI '-:---" ... ·.::....::, CAST BYDD LOCATIONpf;NEL #23 CONCRETE SUPPLIER NELSON i SLOAN MIX NO. i:::-i:::-,-, TYPE OF CEMENT ~~~ ' TICKET NO;:iE,0804 MIXING TIME WATER ADDED AT SITE 10 (:iALLONS AUTHORIZED BY TF:'.UCK SLUMP . 4 • (l IN REMARKS DISTRIBUTION ( 4 ) HAMANN CONSTRUCTION KEN SMITH ARCHITECTURE R2H ENGINEERING . 44 MIN CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG. INSPECTION DEPT. BUILDING PROJECT ADD~~:{::ii-?U3BPiD BP/OSA NO. PLAN FILE NO. ACTUAL AREA LOAD (SQ. IN.) (LBS) 28. 4€~ 7•:;J()()() 28 u ,::~6 114000 STRENGTH TYPE OF (PSI) FRACTURE 2/"7.E.1 i::~()t)5 :28" ::~.E, 1 :l. 7250 l=.'.:11~ 0.00 ON96.?'.1pr .. 18 AIR % UNIT WEIGHT PCF CONCRETE TEMP 76 Of AMBIENT TEMP 71 Of ADMIXTURES Respectfully Submitted, COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH: 96. M-:::1.y. 16 MONTANA 2992 E. La Palma, Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2~74 REPORT OF CYLINDER TESTS Testing & Geotechnical, Inc. 888 Rancheros Dr., Suite E San Marcos, CA 92069 Tel: (619) 735-9060 Fax: (619) 735-8979 CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG~ :2075 LAS PALl1r.;s CARLSBAD, CA 92009 INSPECTION DEPT. PROJECT NO. 2943_ 14 PROJECT NAM~f-),~J~M,.,;;I;.,.f,""'H~L,,.,.=: --:,,!'P~1:;;~:1:.~-:::~3;~3 ""'c1""'i--·i---.i. ,:: E CLIENT:!·11::1MANN CONSTRUCTION PROJECT ADDRBU I LD I Nf:i Cf.'.)PU3Bl:iD BP/OSA NO. r·R•::i;·::; ••.. 1 q ., i PLAN FILE NO. ···-... •.. , .•• .i. ~ SET·-::• :I ·-::•:::i LAB NUMBER AGE (DAYS) DATE NOMINAL ACTUAL AREA LOAD (LBS) STRENGTH TYPE OF SIZE (SQ. IN.) (PSI) FRACTURE i~ 7 ; B :;~s c: 2ES SPECIFIED STRENGTH_~ PSI ~i:.t(Y LOCATION (~pr 30 M-:::i.Y 21 May 21 CAST BY .JH 6Xl2 6X12 Pf~NELS :t-r-1--4 FOR TRASH ENCUJSUF.:E CONCRETE SUPPLIER MIXNO. {::. C::-t:'•''"1 TICKET Na:-'·...!,::. I 1··1tHP···, WATER ADDED" AT"51TE· AUTHORIZED BY MIXING TIME iO GALLONS SLUMP -·"'"]1'!"l""-,A --·1· ~i-· .1N I_.L.1·,i I l•:.1-il_. Or:: REMARKS DISTRIBUTION (4) HAMANN CONSTRUCTION KEN SMITH ARCHITECTURE F.:2H ENG I NEEF.: I NG MIN :-.-. b.t!:: ON CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG. INSPECTION DEPT .. 1 i)3·7~.5(), r--ic-: ·00r1::.-.. ;;.__1 / ._I DATE RECEIVED '::J6 u ,~1i:;r = 2:3 AIR UNIT WEIGHT CONCRETE TEMP AMBIENT TEMP ADMIXTURES Respectfully Submitted, COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH: % PCF Of -y.-·1 / .i::. Of CONFORMS DOES NOT CONFORM D MONTANA 2992 E. La Palma, Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 . -... ---REl?ORT .,.OF'. CY,LJ,NDER /IESTS Testing & Geotechnical, Inc. 888 Rancheros Dr., Suite E San Marcos, CA 92069 Tel: (619) 735-5060 Fax: (619) 735-8979 Cl TY .OF.' CARLSBAD~LDG, .... INSPECTION, -Df=,B-T .,: ·, · 2075 LAS PALMAS CARLSBAD-, CA-92009" CLIENT: .. ,HAMANN CONSTRUCTION._ PROJECT NO. 2943-14. , PRO'JECT NAMEhDOMJN,IE .f?RESS OF'tTC~ BUILDING· PROJECT ADDR. CARLSBAD BP/OSA NO. C995,-·18·11. PLAN FILE NO. SET· 2129 AGE DATE NOMINAL ACTUAL AREA LOAD STRENGTH TYPE OF LAB NUMBER (DAYS) SIZE A: 7· Apr 30-6Xl2 B 28 May 21 --6X12. C 28 May. 2.L-6X1.2. SPECIFIED STRENGTH . ,.3000 PSI CAST BY JH,. LOCATION PANELS # 1-4 .FOR . ·TRASH .. ENCLOSURE CONCRETE SUPPL.IE;R -NELSON-, E: SLOAN,< .... MIX NO. 6552 TYPE OF CEMENT TICKET NO. H01882 MIXING TIME WATER ADDED AT SITE 1 C) t3ALLONS AUTHORIZED ·BY CONTRACTOR SLUMP 4.31N REMARKS DISTRIBUTION (4) HAMANN. CONSTRUCT.I-ON KEN SMITH-ARCHl,TiESTURE. ·. R2H EN13 I-NEER I N13 62.M!N (SQ. IN.) 28.46- 28.-46 28.4€, .. ON 96. Apr •. 23 ... AIR UNIT WEIGi-fl' CONCRETE TEMP AMBIENT TEMP ADMIXTURES (LBS) (P$1) FRACTURE 69000 2424 DATE RECEIVED 96'~Apr .24 % PCF 72 °F OF Respectfully Submitted, CITY OF' CARLSBAD-l,3LDEh,-INSPECTION DEF'T ~ COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH: DcoNFORMS DOES NOT CONFORM D 96.May.01 ~ i' 2992 E. La Palma, Suite A Anaheim, California 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 COVERING WORK FOR S7i ARCHITECT ENGINEER CONTRACTOR -MONTANA Testing & Geotechnical, Inc. FIELD REPORT AVAILABLE: APPROVED PLAN . REPORTNO. PLAN FILE'NO. PROJECT NAM~ ADDRESS OF PROJECT REPORTING REQUIREMENTS: 1(:80 FIELD INSPECTION MANUAL/ MTG SOIL MANUAL --MATERIALS USED (TEST REPORTS): ~S.TM A31.o fuT!E: _ 1/,+'~3';<4,• 'f°I 6-l"H.oDE:. DS.leD ' (cf7lj-(l _ EQUIPMENT/MANPOWER USED: Q_ \-1.\ J:-LDnJ~ ~'f/Et-/,:_f.A70i -~ tJ. ~n-lF/E:.t) W;::u\~P"-. . ITEMS OBSERVED (D~AIL NOS.): - 888 R~ros a·:ive, Suile E San Marco~, California 92069 Tel: (619) 735-5060- Fax: (619) 735-8979 SPECS (Y PRJ. NO. 2 PG I PERMIT NO. /-.J'E."D11£a '. flot.D U-WNS ~& %12.. '% '7t..LJe.1 I LuJrEL-Tb fllWL) Pt({<.. :513 I .. -- LOCATION OF WQRK: llui?A::to>t,$ (?. ~NEL s '#.2,0 -lt.~4 •s*3 . L1NT1;.L (1onlJW?cN e_-~NEL -#_{1A .' j -J .. ' .,.,. -~ ----.. --. --------~ . -. --· .. ------. ---. REMARKS, INCLUDING MEETINGS: . Ct::Rn F(E.D iTo::e. tt,oB{:Q. .. -· . --ltJf.L...l)"ffS l>,;)itt -Ot.6~\l'ED We:.i. !) / i',Y 2 Toc<.~-?u~1i'.S MJC -.. ,,. --- 1--. C Ov°v' ~E11l'.f) l,Jf.l,.ffi W~t--.\N~~e.c ~ . SIZ:Jz, U.~7 /.I 1 LOC!..16,:nou --A1t0D D? ,1:112-B~ s-r o F If CJ:lrJ~ )f5. --I · I "W-K~•.Vl..;'T~D~E fl,f :Et2.ff Qf -\Ll~(BI.L JA ~C7S , !2~ L5~ 7 . t-::r,TFi,Q ~~ . SAMPLES-TAKEN WEATHER: 6rrU.c.A$r {o6 l) -r TESTS REQUIRED .. DEFICIENCIES CLEARED: UNCORRECTED DEFICIENCIES, MISS.ING RFI·/ CO, ADDITIONAL TESTS REQUIRED: I J Iii .. -. II ,. I' . TIME:START: -· :rJ-W 0 ._. TIMEFINISH: -. i '. __ 45 . AUTHORIZED BY: ,r i·f M .. ---------· . --, ~-- .. "·---... I h_~reby certify that I have observed the work listed.ab~ve and-that it compUes. with the soil-investigatiD;Vcom~~rs, .. _ and / or the approved plans, speci~and applicable sections of the building code, unless otherwise note . . l~~9-~~ J/tA /_/ 5 I 2--1199 (o ~bt&t --Signature · --. Date of Report Certification Number ~LG JAJ/J;tt~ / ~ Print Name -Rev. 5/95- 2992 E. La Palma, Suite A Anaheim, California 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 63~-2974 COVERING WORK FOR Field we..\cl..i n 5 ·-ARCHITECT \<.en n e.-\-\1\ t), S MU,'-\ ENGINEER . ~'2.. l-\ e.l'\':) \\'\eer·in~ "I.nc:., • CONTRACTOR H o. VY\~ v"' CoY\:)-4-. 1:hc.. SUB;CONTRACTOR -MONTANA Testing & Geotechnical, Inc. FIELD REPORT AVAILABLE: SOIL REPORT (Y) (N) APPROVED PLANS(o;)(N) FOR WEEK ENDING . s-3 -C\(p REPORT NO. PLAN FILE NO. -NA- .PROJECT NAME s~r\ t:>ie~o Co\'\~ ~t.\clil,~-l) Oh\\ 1"\\ .c,. INSPECTION ADDRESS ADDRESS OF PROJECT 888 Rancheros Drive, Suite E San Marcos, California 92069 Tel: (619) 735-5060 Fax: (619) 735-8979 SPECSID(N) APPROVED SHOP DRAWINGS (Y) (N) IPRJ.~ q43. o 14. PG OF !PERMIT NO. q s -l ~II "Pre s.s :i..),\c. l ~C\-R-~lfc,---A~·cJ --_4_ -. '!)_~ .. \' C~r\S bcid.. \C\ 40\ ke llo~ !I Av-c. Cq,-1.sb'id REPORTING REQUIREMENTS: ICBO FIELD INSPECTION MANUAL/MTG SOIL MANUAL " MATERIALS USE!l (TEST REPORTS): AS,m A3<o -p\q~~ rin~ M~+ql e11T-ll EQUIP,MENT/MANPOWER USED: ~ (J.)e..\dil'IO\ O..enet'CI +or .s Cef'-4.i.fic.cl :l:. we.\dJ.-\s .. ~ 'R,ol'\ c.'no..'lle.S.: * ~, ,"l.,o e:d~H~ c,no.\16'c· q-50,\'o ITEMS OBSERVED (DETAiL NOS.): Bc-\-\ol!} '.fRN-\ GonN-c:ri o !\S ~r 9-"s,a. \,)Ql~ c\0~n . 'b/ C..onruc:,:t11l11 s P'1 . s 12. ~/ ) C, O"(n.l,... Qb~~~n!!11 S fk'. S13 LOCATION OF WORK: po.\"Q..\ 4 O.hd. s lo~e,-Conne.cd:i%1 t :pqn.LI s Coy-Y'\A-,. Co'nn, @ +r9.S½ e,.nclo.sur-t. · ~~~} \7 ~o\'Y'\OI\. C.t1:ion@±t""'~h ~nc:.io.su~ 1 :p~:oa~ l S bo ui cl aw~ CD :n~i REMARKS, INCLU ING MEETINGS: . . · . . Cer-ti~ie..c\ ~Ucl.Q..rs lSe.rg, c\·=>SeclAtl '->H-1\'1e)h~ -o.cce.p\-c:i\.;k we,\dji.j :pro ~div(~S 1 :p<'O~UC:1 \'"I~ AwS D l.\ ~-IS\.1911"" Q CC:<.¢: s bu. w ii lcb \ Co Mp\.a-.\t.d t.vo~ \c:. ..Q:1~."'~ -\c C..okQpi--. wi+~ ~\~·,~~ '" 9~prl)-.,;Q.a plq~s: ' ,. ~N.o+~: F1~1d Weldin~ O~f'Ct-NOI\S Cqnci.t.d dw,+a \ fl+e-'\t'er ~nc.-.. .q'roW\ 50il'd . b\QS+'i ~ SAMPLES-I AKEN-no h-1:... . WEATHER: $u V'I n y TESTS REQUIRED r\OW\JL DEFICIENCIES CLEARED: NohJI... - UNCORRECTED DEFICIENCIES, MISSING RFI / CO, ADDITIONAL.TESTS REQUIRED: Y\I\Y\.t.. n -fi1 'l'J / TIME START: 8}2 Ah'\ TIME FINISH: 1 ruo AUTHORIZED BY: . -A.h'\ . JI/{·,., ...... . - I hereby certify that I have observed the w9rk listed above and that it complies with the soil investigation recommendations, and I or the approved plans, specifications and applicable-sections onhe building code, unless otherwise noted. 5 I . 2. /199 (; ICP,O 513 SB e1p 1-13-ct- Date ofReport certificalion Number Print Name Rev: 5/95 .. 2992 E. La Palma, Suite A Anaheim, California 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 COVERING WORK FOR '::>1ts LJ 'E. \c\., N ARCHITECT . \... , - . • p. cs."'' "'-- 'ENGINEER R : CONTRACTOR µ Jt}- SU~NTRACTO\ -;;:>,,t}lf/-J.) I ~ INSPECTION ADDRESS '?rl4 ~ -MONTANA Testing & Geotechnical, Inc. FIELD REPORT AVAILABLE: SOIL REPORT (Y) (N) APPROVED PLA_NS {¥11fl) FOR WEEK ENDING I'\\.~ s-I C, c; (. REPORT NO. I PLAN FILE NO. P~ECTNAME ,k)O M.i IJ \ \'c:. ADDRESS OF PROJECT REPORTING REQUIREMENTS: ICBO FIELD INSPECTION MANUAL/ MTG SOIL MANUAL _MATERIALS USED (TESTREPORTS): A 3 t- EQUIPMENT/MANPOWER' USED:p( cl · _ . Wi;:\ \"»LS REMARKS, INCLUDI ~EETINGS: DEFICIENCIES CLEARED: TIME START: 1 ,' tJ2) ~ Print Name TIME FINISH: ~ ~ lJ 0 SAMPLES TAKEN TESTS REQUIRED W\f'tit l /199 b · Date of Report 888 Rancheros Drive, Suite E San Marcos, California 92069 Tel: (619) 735-5060 Fax: (619) 735-8979 SPECS !¥MN) APPROVED SHOP DRAWINGS (Y) (N) PRJ. NO. .;).. Lf~O l <+ PG I OF / ; 2992 E. La Palma, Suite Anaheim, California 928 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632;.2974 COVERING WORK FOR INSPECTION ADDRESS -MONTANA Testing & Geotechnical, Inc. AVAILABLE: · soil REPORT" (Y) (N) APPROVED PLANS (Y) (N) 'FOR WEEK ENDING 4 . '2 · REPORTNO. O\ PLAN FILE NO'. 'PROJECT NAME u REPORTING REQUIREMENTS: ICBO FIELD INSPECTION MANUAL/ MTQ SOIL MANUAL 888 Rancheros Drive, Suite E San Marcos, California 92069 Tel: (619) 735-5060 Fax: (619) 735-8979 SPECS (Y) (N) APPROVED.SHOP DRAWINGS {Y) (N) 4 PG \ OF MATERIALS USED (TEST REP.ORTS): . C!:>Ne-i~eJ:6 t--,nx: t?E-e?\C;;,t:,.L $' ~552 t ~B?\ UJ /411 SW~~. Fa21~t:-¥-a 4Brl:$L EOUIPMENT/MANPOWE~ ysED: ! 1 ®e JEUt\<. \}.)1 ~-ra?-, 'I woisl<esq, ITEMS OBSERVED (DETAIL-NOS.). fl.AC,E.HPN:C Of c.a'1C,gE.:C& .'fol?,. :nL:t-up PA:t-lE:LG;, PBt-11;.L~ I P£.R.~r'2)q I PANE.L.$'(o PE~ ~Isle, ;fli,Na ~ 12 PE.Ra.tan: <2>1\_ , PAN&L°' lG:, Hi& 51:\e.GT ':>10 • :rFAs1J &t--1CL.ooog1= m~eL4'" \-n-tf<.ll4 '?e~ ~ . LOCATION OF-WORK: ... ·A14. .. .. · REMARKS, INCLUDING·MEETINGS; ·. '· · . · : , · . . . . . : ... -~~~ wt:::RE. TA~EN@. . JRA~\.,\ ~et-0W'i2·c;. ffi,NE;,LS WEATHER: : ~ 0r To 75"f DEFICIENCIES CLEARED: UNCORRECTED DEFICIENCIES, MISSING RFI /CO, ADDITIONAL TESTS REQUIRED: SAMPLES TAKEN \. $i' Oft TESTS REQUIRED \ ~ 0 F 3 / . . . llfvlE START:_ 1}oo ~tt ." . .. . TIME FINISl;l: 1,0 : 00 AtJt -. . . --AUTHORIZED BY: /U· ~ ,, ... ~ ~ -I hereby certify that I have qqser:vec! the work listed above and that-it complies with the·soil investigation recommendations, . · · · · · ...... • · • · · and (or the approved plans, specifications and applicable sections of the building code, unless otherwise noted. Signa~ ·4 , 2:, /1~9~ pate of'Report 70]?;£\CBO Certification Number .:1~C,-l-\oQ<-,~ s Print Name Rev: 5/95 •. 2992 E. La Palma, Suite A Anaheim, California 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 . COVERING WORK FOR ARCHITECT ENGINEER. CONTRACTOR . SUB·CONTRACTOR $}tl,~. -MON,TANA Testing & Geotechnical, Inc. FIELD REPORT AVAILABLE: SOIL REPORT (Y)'(N) AP PROVED PLANS (Y) (N) REPORT NO. : PLAN FILE NO. PROJECT NAME'\'\ ~VV\\Nc... ADDRESS OF PROJECT 888 Rancheros Drive, Suite E San Marcos, California 92069 Tel: (619) 735-5060 Fax: (619) 735-8979 SPECS (Y) (N) APPROVED SHOP DRAWINGS (Y) (NJ PG \ OF I PERMIT NO. C6-'f5-( Zl INSPECTl"·ADDRESS' '119 Kr,;u. Ave.., r-J1 f<~t~. A-Vi£, C:A.iltS?.:iAO C,t. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS: ICBO FIELD INSPECTION MANUAL/ MTG SOIL MANUAL MATERIALS USED (TEST REPORTS): ~ A , · tJ§-rn1 ~ lo(~ I lt:'70/o ):'aUiPMENT/MA.NPOWER USED:. :ITEMS OBSERVED (DETAIL NOS.): g F. , . . . . f IN ~l<C!tJGJ REMA~KS, INCLOO~G MEETINGS: ,;) I ; . ~Elt/Fcm:;~. ST!ilcL /1\/SPtr:c.1/i(J ~ StVE,GBA-l>fe.., l«,,1rtoNS. L11p AIJO C/.rf,t&.n~. I ~'/w-,Tf.+s e PANX:.L -q.l --118 Ch.w .i!>f,& No1 00~!/.JIOIJ~ 'Rc~RA+J . (b~ag.., .5?~C.Fi; W/154 ~e.. D1A.#8 . :i t~:,~,ii~ 14:ft'lbYAk 6&.tteAL. Ar s,re:::):wo_f?lt_"l?icetl!?S. , DEFIGIENCIES CLEARED: UNCORRECTED DEFICIENCIES, MISSING RFI / CO, ADDITIONAL TESTS REQUIRED: ~IME START: 8: OC) TIME FINISH: t.. '. t:>1.!) SAMPLES TAKEN TESTS REQUIRED AUTHORIZED BY: I hereby certify that I have observed the work listed above and that it complies with the soil investigation recommendations, or the approved plans · · · ns and applicable sections of the building code, unless otherwise noted . . f , l<o 119g{o baie ot Report . Certification Number Print Name Rev: 5/95 2992 E. La Palma, Suite A Anaheim, California 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 , ~OVERINllW.ORK FOR :ARCHITECT ENGINEER . CONTRACTOR . SUB-CONTRACTOR INSPECTION ADDRESS ]). Sm1?·?1 -MONTANA Testing & Geotechnical, Inc. FIELD REPORT AVAILABLE: SOIL REJ;QBI (l(] '(IJ! . APPROVED PLAN REPORT ND. 2. . Pl,AN FILE NO. PROJECT NAME' . ADDRESS OF PROJECT · 19 4 /<F't.-1.LO~~ REPORTING REQUIREMENTS: ICBO FIELD INSPECTION MANUAL/MTG SOIL MANUAL MATERIALS USED (TEST REPORTS): . EQUIPMENTiMANPOWER-USED: 1J ! /1 .,,1-1/\J (_,, J-1/Ut!Jlf.(r, 7/o)A_ ~ ' ,--- ITEM$ OBSERVED (DETAIL NOS.): _2 fl/(. S" • ' " COCATION OF WORK: 888 Rancheros Drive, Suite E · San Marcos, California 92069 Tel: (619) 735-5060 Fax: (619) 735-8979 SPECS APPROVED SHOP DRAWINGS (f.8N) PRJ.NO. Li .A '1Sf--,.3 -017 PG OF PERMIT NO • C. Oflt.LSciAO CA' / REMARKS, 'INCLUDING MEETINGS: IA/If_ {!.otJ D 1176/J 5 SC? If /c{)t.iA? D (6 O(}~De. ou;q. Cbf'l7'/?QL I INSPEC11o,J ' . /JJl!s {]qtJ(Yi. d!..sD JJuR... Tb /<.Att,/ !{1to+ -SAMPLES TAKEN· ,WEATHER: TESTS REQUIRED DEFICIENCIES CLEARED: ' ,, UNCORRECTED DEFICIENCIES, MISSING·RFI / CO, ADDITIONAL TESTS REQUIRED: TIME START; '7: t) 0 TIMEFINISH: 1: 3 0 If-;4-\. AUTHORIZED BY: ..a..-c:._ I hereby certify tha.t I have observed the work listed above and that-it complies with the soil investigation recommendations, and / or the approved plans, specifications and applicable sections of the building code, unless otherwise noted. 11. 171199 <o · Date of R~port · Certification Number Rev: 5/95 2992 E. La Palma, Suite A Anaheim, California 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 . CQVERING WORK FOR· ARCHITECT ENGINEER CONTRACTOR : SUB·CQNTRACTOR . INSPECTION 'ADDRESS 919' ket. MONTANA Testing & Geotechnical, Inc. FIELD REPORT AVAILABLE: SOIL REPORT (Y) (N) :APPROVED PLANS~) FOR WEEK ENDING .. .A Q . ..,. • Z,,6 -d~ _REPORT NO. 3 PLAN FILE NO. r. PROJECT NAME REPORTING REQUIREMENTS: ICBO FIELD INSPECTION MANUAL/ MTG SOIi:. MANUAL 888 Rancheros Drive, Suite E San Marcos, California 92069 Tel: (619) 735-5060 Fax: (619) 735-8979 SPECS (Y) . APPROVED SHOP DRAWINGS (Y) ~ PRJ.NO. 'd 2'7,'3-(5/ PG /_ OF / PERMIT NO. .c~-"15- MATERIALS USED.{TESTREPORTS): /) . tt: ,' /t~M~_r 7!.1/,'~~ . _IT : . _ . _':2fX!Qf5L Lf3)J(1Ri7/c.. f>?IK [)l{Sl(!?/J 5'5Z:., __ ~~ ;,-r· ITEMS OBSERVED (DETAIL NOS,): · . :zt- : · R11cEMtrAlr ¢ {1tINS¢uZ>ArtN aF:30/.o (!.v&c v..1.lL).S "t: t1yv'e/4'Cr,e;. 3. oooPst. Mix 552._ . · / 1 ' • I REMARKS, lrilCLUDiNG MEETINGS: trr r!aHIIMCT'OfZ. ~E. £ll'ote:r T?J J),seLAcc. A)Arltte. .kJHtt...:E. R1tc1AJ<;k (!eJ;(!,€/ET,E-/fJ,v1u.s -it"~ 2-_f, 2..2, 2/ t 7 _'-<.)(Rt &fa;,!c.D 70 ~,N. /JPrlfR... Mf:'idffetJ'C OJcrt1&1c7* ll?rfD: /-lose 11J Rw~ve ~',(t!!!.'SS /J'Jr4-rER,, DEFICIENCIES CLEARED:· _LINCORRECTED DEFICIENCIES, MISSING RFI / CO, ADDITIONAL TESTS REQUIRED: TIMESTART: J1,'€)0Af>'I TIME FINISH: / 'Z. ; jO AUTHORIZED BY.: I hereby certify that I have observed the work listed above and that it complies with the soil investigation recommendations,. and / or the approved plans, specifications and applicable sections of the building code, unless otherwise noted. Signature 1 I /$ /199 (0 Date of Report 12flc{C Certification Number -:j)rztsrQc ;;];Q1,;;p:. Print N'ame Rev: 5/95 MONTANA 2992 E. La Palma, Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 REPORT OF CYLINDER TESTS Testing & Geotechnical, Inc. 888 Rancheros Dr., Suite E San Marcos, CA 92069 Tel: (619) 735-5060 Fax: (619) 735-8979 CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG. INSPECTION DEPT: 2075 LAS PALMAS CARLSBAD, CA 92009 CLIENT: HAMANN CONSTRUCTION- PROJECT NO. 2 9 4 3 ..... 1 4 PROJECT NAME:DOM IN IE PRESS OFF I CE BUILDING PROJECT ADDR.CARLSBAD BP/OSA NO. PLAN FILE NO.r.zt!t_£7?E~'l.'!1:V ) SET 2084 AGE DATE NOMINAL ACTUAL AREA LOAD STRENGTH TYPE OF LAB NUMBER (DAYS) , A 7 Apr 25 8 28 May 16 ,... 28 May 15 '-' HD 28 May 16 SPECIFIED STRENGTH 3 0 0 0 PSI CAST BY DD LOCATION PANEL #19 CONCRETE SUPPLIER MIX.NO. 554 TICKET NO. S 6 08 04 WATER ADDED AT SITE AUTHORIZED BY SLUMP 4 ~ O. IN REMARKS DISTRIBUTION ( 4 ) NELSON/ SLOAN TYPE OF CEMENT MIXING TIME HAMANN CONSTRUCTION KEN SMITK ARCHITECTURE R2H ENGINEERING. 73 MIN SIZE 6X12 6X12 6X12 CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG. INSPECTION (SQ. iN.) (LBS) (PSI) FRACTURE 28.45 76500 (1~2688]·, - 28.45 28.46 0.00 ON 96:. Apr. 18 DATE RECEIVED 96.Apr_19 AIR UNIT WEIGHT CONCRETE TEMP AMBIENT TEMP ADMIXTURES Respectfully Submitted, COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH: % PCF 76 o F '7 'l OF r c.. DcoNFORMs DOES NOT CONFORM D 96.Apr.25 MONTANA 2992 E. La Palma, Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 REPORT OF CYLINDER TESTS ,,.. Testing & Geotechnical, Inc. 888 Rancheros Dr., Sllite E San Marcos, CA 92069 Tel: (619) 735-5060 Fax: (619) 735-8979 CITY OF CARLS8AD····8LDG. INSPECTION D.EPT. 2075 LAS PALMAS CARLSBAD, CA 92009 CLIENT: HAMANN CONSTRUCTION PROJECT NO. 2 9 4 3 ····· 1 4 PROJECT NAME:DOM IN IE PRESS OFF I CE BUILDING PROJECT ADDR.CARLSBAD BP/OSA NO. PLAN FILE NO. c: _____:=::J SET 2083 AGE DATE NOM.INAL ACTUAL AREA LOAD STRENGTH TYPE OF LAB NUMBER (DAYS) SIZE (SQ. IN.) (LBS) (PSI) FRACTURE A 7 Apr 25 6X12 28.46 81500 (~. ~- 8 28 May 16 6X12 28.46 C 28 May 16 6X12 28.46 HD 28 May 15 o .·oo SPECIFIED STRENGTH 3 Q Q Q PSI CAST BY DD ON 96. Apr. 18 DATE RECEIVED 9 6. Apr . 1 9 LOCATION PANEL :f:1:5 CONCRETE SUPPLIER NELSON / SLOAN AIR MIX NO. 5 5 2 TYPE OF CEMENT UNIT WEIGHT TICKET NO. 5 6 Q 7 6 g MIXING TIME 5 7 MIN CONCRETE TEMP WATER ADDED AT SITE 1 0 GALLONS AMBIENT TEMP AUTHORIZED BY PUMP & DRIVER ADMIXTURES SLUMP REMARKS DISTRIBUTION (4) HAMANN CONSTRUCTION KEN SMITH ARCHITECTURE R2H ENGINEERING Respectfully Submitted, CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG. INSPECTION DEPT. COMPRESSIVE ~TRENGTH: % PCF 79 OF c:: '7 V f OF DcoNFORMS DOES NOT CONFORM D 96.Apr.25 MONTANA 2992 E. La Palma, Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 REPORT OF CYLINDER TESTS Testing & Geotechnical; Inc. 888 Rancheros Dr., Suite E San Marcos, CA 92069 Tel: (619) 735-5060 Fax: (619) 735-8979 CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG. INSPECTION DEPT. 2075 LAS PALMAS CARLSBAD, CA'92009 CLIENT: HAMANN CONSTRUC.TION. PROJECT NO. 2 94 3····· 14 PROJECTNAME:DOMINIE PRESS OFFICE BUILDING PROJECT ADDR.CARLSBAD BP/OSA NO. PLAN FILE No_.C -~ ===~--] -'SET ·20'.85 AGE. --NOMINAL ACTUAL AREA LOAD -STRENGTH TYPE OF DATE LAB NUMBER (DAYS) SIZE (SQ. IN.) (LBS) (PSI) FRACTURE A 7 Apr 25 6X12 28.46 79000 <:·217Y 8 28 May 16 6X12 28.46 C 28 May 16 5v-1.., "'' '>0 J11C &.U .. --t-U HD 28 Ma;{ 16 0.00 SPECIFIED STRENGTH 3 Q O Q PSI CAST BY DD ON 9 6 • Apr_ . 1 8 DATE RECEIVED 96.Apr.1!9 LOCATION PANEL #23 CONCRETESUPPLIER NELSON / SLOAN MIX NO_. 5 5 2 TYPE OF CEMEt,fr TICKET NO. 5 6 Q 8 Q 4 MIXING TIME 44 MIN WATER ADDED AT SITE 10 GALLONS AUTHORIZED BY , TRUCK SLUMP 4. 0 IN REMARKS DISTRIBUTION ( 4 ) HAMANN CONSTRUCTION KEN SMITH ARCHITECTURE AIR UNIT WEIGHT CONCRETE TEMP AMBIENT TEMP ADMIXTURES R2H ENGINEERING Respectfully Submitted, CITY OF CARLS8AD~8LDG. INSPECTION DEPT. CQMPRESSIVE STRENGTH: % PCF '7 e:: ru Of '71 r I Of D CONFORMS· ' DOES NOT CONFORM D POOR ·QUALITY ORIGINAL S ;,, DATE: 1/22/96 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 95-1811 EsGH Corporation Professiona{ Pfan !l(eview 'Engineers SET: II PROJECT ADDRESS: 1949 Kellog Ave. PROJECT NAME: Dominie Press Inc. Buildi:Q.g CJ APPLICANT N~EWER ~~ CJ FIRE CJ FILE • The plans trans'r~1itted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. · D The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's ********** codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. D The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. D The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: • Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. D Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted: (by: ) Telephone #: D REMARKS: Sy: Chuck Mendenhall Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA DCM D GP D PC 1/16/96 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, Calif9rnia 92123 + (619) 560-1468 + Fax (619) 560-1576 (. f 1e!) - DATE: 12/26/95 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 95-1811 EsGil Corporation Professiona{ PCan ~view 'Engineers SET:I PROJECT ADDRESS: 1949 Kellog Ave PROJECT NAME: Dominie Press. Inc Building ~ AT · JURIS. · D FIRE D N REVIEWER D FILE D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's *********** codes. D The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's ********** codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be. corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. • The· check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. • The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Ken Smith 435 W. Bradley Ave.,# C, El Cajon, CA 92020 • Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant ( except by mail ) that the plan check has been completed. D Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted: D REMARKS: By: Chuck Mendenhall Esgil Corporation (by: • GA O CM D GP D PC ) Telephone#: Enclosures: 12/14/95 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Ch~sapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (619) 560-1468 + Fax (619) 560-1576 Carlsbad 95-1811 12/26/95 GENERAL PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 1949 Kellog Ave DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 12/14/95 REVIEWED BY: Chuck Mendenhall FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): PLAN CHECK NO.: 95-1811 DATE REVIEW COMPLETED: 12/26/95 This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance With the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 303 (c), 1991 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints to: ESGIL CORPORATION. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which . each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plahs. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 619/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Chuck Mendenhall at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. Carlsbad 95-1811 12/26/95 • PLANS 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints, to: Esgil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123, (619) 560-1468. • GENERAL . 2. All sheets of the structural and electrical plans are required to be signed by the California licensed architect or engineer responsible for the plan preparation. The electrical plans are signed by a general contractor. 1hey must be signed by the electrical contractor who will .actually be doing the work. 3. Provide a statement on the Title Sheet of the plans that this project shall comply with Title 24 and 1991 UBC, UMC and UPC and 1990 NEC. 4. Provide a -note on the plans .indicating if any hazardous materials will be stored and/or used within the building which exceed the quantities listed in UBC Tables 9-A and 9-8. • EXIT SIGNS 5. Del;ete the exit sign shown on sheet E-2 cat door 3 from corridor 111 to the warehouse 107. The wareh_ouse may not be used as an exit for the office areas .. Section 3303(e). GLASS AND GLAZING 6. Show safety glazing in the following locations, per Section 5406(d): Where the nearest edge of glazing is within a 24-inch arc of either side of a door in a closed position. This applies to window U at order process rm 104 FOUNDATION 7. Provide a copy of the project soil report prepared by a California licensed architect or civil engineer. The report shall include foundation design recommendations based on the engineer's findings and shall comply with UBC Section 2905. The report provided includes only additonal geotechnical information. The main body of the report was not submitted with the plans. 8. The soils engineer recommended that he/she review the foundation excavations. Note on the foundation plan that "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building Department foundation inspection, the soils engin~er shall advise the building official-in writing that: a) The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report, b) The utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and the foundation excavations comply with the intent of the soils report." Carlsbad 95-1811 12/2,6/95 STRUCTURAL 9. GLB 4 shown on page 20 of the calc's must be a 5 1/8 X 25. The plans show this beam as a 51/8 X24. 10. The horizontal tie spacing for panels 1, 18, & 20 at the piers must be 6" OC. See page 97 of the calc's. Sheet 9 of the plans shows these ties to be 12" OC. 11. Specify #3 horizontal ties at 12" OC in the piers of panels 11 & 12 on sheet S 11 of the plans. See page 116 of the calc's for the specific requirements. 12. Show on the panel elevations the required #6 hold downs for panels 14 & 15 on sheet S 11 of the plans. See page 120 of the calc's. 13. The continuous footing for the panel along line "D" is designed considering the concentrated loads to be spread over the entire 18' length of the panel. Section 2614( c) of the UBC allows the concentrated load to be distributed over the width of bearing plus 4 X the wall thickness. The bearing area should be 6" plus 4 X 7"= 34'! bearing width. See page 192 of the calc's. 14. Include in the design calc's the mezzanine ledger. See detail 3/S16 on the plans. + PLUMBING, MECHANICAL AND ENERGY CORRECTIONS + JURISDICTION: Carlsbad + PLAN REVIEW NUMBER: 95-1811 + PLAN REVIEWER: Glen Adamek DATE: 12/27/95 SET: I • PLUMBING (UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE) 15. Show that water heater is adequately braced to resist seismic forces. Provide two straps. One strap at top 1/3 of the tank and· one strap at bottom 1/3 of the tank. UPC, Section 1310(e). 16. Correct the water line sizing calculations. The 65 psi at the output of the backflow device, and subtract 1/2 psi for each foot of ·elevation highest fixture is above the meter, or 12.5 psi. This leaves only 52.5 psi. The incorrect pressure range of UPC, Table 10-2 is used on sheet P1. Please correct. (Use 45 to 60 psi.) • M~CHANICAL (UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE) 17. Detail ladder access to roof mounted HVAC equipment. Carlsbad 95-1811 12/26/95 18. Detail disposal of main condensate drainage from air conditioning units. (UMC Section 510) • ENERGY CONSERVATION 19. The energy design does not show the raised floor over non-conditioned space as shown on the plans. Please correct. 20. Provide automatic shut-off controls for lighting as per Title 24, Part 6, Section 131 (d). 21. The_ corrected, completed and signed ENV-1, L TG-1, and MECH-1 forms must be imprinted on the plans. Note: If you have any questions regarding this plan review list please contact Glen Adamek at (619) 560-1468. To speed the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans. The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 619/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan .review items, please contact Chuck Mendenhall at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. Carlsbad 95-1811 12/26/95 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PREPARED BY: Chuck Mendenhall BUILDING ADDRESS: 1949 Kellog Ave Sprinklered BUILDING PORTION BUILDING AREA (sq~ ft.) office 4780 warehouse 17184 Air Conditioning 4780 Fire Sprinklers 21964 TOTAL VALUE UBC Building Permit Fee: UBC Plan Check Fee: 62 27 3.60 • 1.80 PLAN CHECK NO.: 95-1811 DATE: 12/26/95 BUILDING OCCUPANCY: 82/81 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN VALUATION MULTIPLIER VALUE ($) 296360 463968 17208 39535 817,071 $ 2993.50 $ 1945.77 Comments: Value of building based on type Ill N const. Based on the actual materials Sheet 1 of 1 valuefee.dot Ir ; ~~ ,: ~½ 'i City of Carlsbad . M·3ek·h,t4Aiiet-i•lA·kil•eetAeii ,-v/ L BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST DATE/ l':'/~.S . , PLANCHECK NO. CB Y5/f // BUILDING ADDRESS: c£-¥'f ;(;'e/!Gf,9. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ff--v _z:-,,uii, /3/,,t}G-: ASSESSOR'S PARCEL.NUMBER: ;;2../;}.. ~ 09'?--~?' . EST.VALUE ___ _ f~?o/?6 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DENIAL APPROVAL The Item you have submitted for review ha betn approved. The approval ii based on planl, information and/or specfflcalions provided in your submittal; ther8'0re any chang11 to these Items after this date, including fteld modiflcatlonl, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued contormance with applicable codel. Please review c:arlfully all commenta anached, 11 failure to comply with instructions in thiS report can rlSUI in suspension a permit to build. P~ the attached report a deficiencies marked w~~·-Make ~ correctlona to plans or apeeiftcatlona for compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans ~or}~ificatioqi1. , . __ to thia office for revWNI.~ 1~,,, ~ ~~-~. av#t>f/)1@~ Date: ¥4 6 / D ~ ~ A Right-of-Way permit ii required prlortoconstructlon ·-----------a the following. improvements: ATTACHMENTS . D Dedication Applcllkn D Dedication QIIClclll D Improvement Applcallan D Improvement Checkllt D Future Improvement AgrNffllf'lt D Grading Permit AppllcatlQn D Grading Subn'.llttll Chlcklillt D Right of Way Penni Appllcadon D Right of Way Penni Submittal Checklllt and lnfonnldon ShNt D·Sewer FN lnf0rmlllon Shlit . By: ________ Date: __ _ ENGINEERING DEPT. CONTACT PERSON NAME~&:e:4/4 2)2~ Clly'otcarllbad ADDRESS: 2075 Lp Palmas Dr., Car1sbad, CA 92009 PHONE: (619) 4.'38-1161, Ext .ef.3/...5 A-4 P:\DOCI\CHKLl1\IP0001.PRII . REV OS/11/M 2075 Las Palmas Dr.• Carlsbad, CA.92009-1576 • (619) 438-1161 • FAX (619) 438-0894 '( BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST SITEPLNf· 1 sV 2ndv' 3rdv' [ZJ D D 1. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to sca.Je. Show: D D Jo D A. North Arrow B. Existing & Proposed Structures C. Existing Street Improvements 2 .. Show.on site plan: A. Drainage Patterns B. Existing & Prop<;>sed Slopes D. Property Lines Easements e. Easements F. Right-of-Way Width & Adjacent Streets Q. Existing Topography 3. Include note: •surface water to be directed away from the building foundation at a 2% gradient for no less than 5' or 2/3 the dlst_,ce to the property line (whichever is less).· (Per 1985 UBC 2907(d)5]. On graded sit .. , the top of any exterior foundation .shall extend above the elevation of the street gutter at point of discharge or the inlet of an approved drainage device a minimum of 12 ii:,ches plus two percenr (per 1990 UBC 2907(d)5.). 4; Include on title sheet · A. · Site address B. Assessor's Parcel Number C. Legal Description For commercial/industrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, Include: Total building square footage with the square foc;,tage for each different use, existing sewer . permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing, warehouse, office, etc.). previously approved. EXISTING PERMrr NUMBER DESCRIPTION _Paige 1 of 4 MVOl/11/N BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKUSt DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL.COMPLIANCE 1 stv' 2nd./ 3rd./ D D D 5. Project does not comply with-the following Engineering Conditions of approval for Project ~o. f;f' _.9..s-~ ')--I} /J'IP.rr dR &,t1~v£D_ · Conditions were compiled with by: _____ _ Date: ______ _ DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS D · D D 6. Dedication for all street Rights-of-Way adfacent to the building site and any storm drain or utility easements on· the building· site is required for all new buildings and for DD D remodels with a value at or exceeding $ _____ -pursuant to Code Section 18.40.030. . Dedication required as follows: _______________ _ Attached_ please find an application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process. Provide the completed application form -and the requirements on the checklist at the time of resubmittal. Dedication completed by ______________ _ Date: ___ _ IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS /)u/?-3 f~r - 'Ta. AJI needed public Improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the construction exceeds S -pursuant to Code Section 18.40.040. Public Improvements ·required as follows: _. ------------------- PINN have a registered Civil Engineer prepare appropriate improvement plans and submit 1hern together with the requirements on th• attached checklist for a separate plancheck prOCNI through the Engineering Department. Improvement plans must be appnwN, appropriate securities posted and fees pakl prior to issuance of permit. Attached please ftnd an application form and submittal checklist for the public improvements requirements. Provide the completed application form and the requirements on the checkJlst at the time of resubmittal. Improvement Plans signed by! -·------------. Date: __ _ Page 2 Clf 4 REVOl/11/N • • BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST !Jtv' 2!Jdv' ~dv' . . . U Ll LJ 7b. Corauctlon of the public Improvements may be deferred pursuant to code Section 18.«l Plew submit a recent property title report or current grant deed on the property Ind processing fee of S · so we may prepare the neceaa,y Future Improvement Agreement. This agreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Future public improvements required u follows: __________ _ Improvement Plans signed by: __________ _ Date: ---- D D D 7c. Enclosed pleue find your Future Improvement Agreement. Please return signed and notarized Agreement to the Engineering Department. Future lrrtprovement Agreement completed by: ___________ _ Date: _________ _ D · D D . 7d. No Public Improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or defective- improvements found adlacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction qt th~ City Inspector prior to occupancy, GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMEN,:S The conditions that invoke the need·for a grading permit are found in Section 11.06.030 of the Municipal Code. D -0 D ea. Inadequate Information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading requirements. lncfude accurate grading quantities (cut, fill Import, e~rt). D . D D Sb. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer must be Submitted together with the completed application form attached. NOTE: The Grading Permit must be Issued and rough grading approval obtained prior to issuance of a Building Permit, ef,e 9 _s-oolo 1.)w6 ... 3-~·//~'14, Grading Inspector sign off by: ______________ Date: ___ _ ,. D D D , ac: No Grading Permit required. REVOl/11/N " 8UILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST MJSCFf I ANEOUS PERMITS ~2nd./ 3rd./ ~ D D 9. A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-Way and/or y{ 0 0 }loo private work adjacent to the public Right-of-Way. Types of work include, but are not limited to~ strHt improvements, trHs, driveways, tieing into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities. Right-of-Way permit required for------------------- A separate Right-of-Way permit Issued b engineering Department is required for the following: ~"""---'-'I~· 4-,t;;,4...::t.a~::=..~~*".µ.-~""'--J;..;::;J.:::;z.:..""-~::l::1..;:;'-'-- 1 O. A SEWER PERMIT is required concurrent with the building permit issuance. The fee is noted· in the fHs section on the following page. 11. INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT is .required. Applicant must complete Industrial Waste Permit Application Form and submit for City approval prior to issuance of a Permit .. Industrial waste permit accepted by:. _______ Date: ___ _ - ) RIVOl/11/N 1/ · ENGiNEERING DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING REVIEW SECTION FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET ~ Estimat~ based on unco~fi~ed information from ap~licant .. r Calculation based on building planc;heck plan submittal. A<;ldre~: /CJ 1: q &, ll-41-f b C/d<H' · Bldg. Permit No .. --'C:::.....;;/3_9~S:_/_J'_/...:..1/__,__ Prepared by: (}11\ (tl . Date: ~/7("Checked by:. f1i/ Date: /1-vvf 1'5 ~CULATIO'tE List !YP8§ and square footages for all uses. s, i!St> +-/ 8'0 o = .3 ::t s Types of Use:wav·A4&4:o:3<½ I h , II & --;. Sq. Ft./Ul!tk: 3° ~ ::l... · S,ooo ::: EDU's: 0° 4 7 ADT CALCULATIONS: List. W~~d square foote!"l~ for all us~. 7 Total EDU's: __ =0_• _4"---'-7 __ _ ~ 5t3St>t:tS zypoQ ... ;;._5/~pS /~3 Types of Use: lu~ pgt,e,()_ fi Sq. Ft./lhl.ita: 3 ~ ADT's: I gr In~ 4)() 0 0 9b60p Total ADT's_..__/J=--f _____ _ I FEES REQUIRED: PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE REQUIRED J{ YES O NO (See Building Department for amount) WITHIN CFD: ~YES (no bridge & thoroughfare fee, · D NO · reduced Traffic Impact Fee) ~~ARK~N-UEU FEE PARK AREA: __ ---,-- FEE/UNIT: ___ ~ X NO. UNITS: -~RAFFIC IMPACT FEE ADT's/UNITS: j 2{ ~ ~RiDGE AND THOROUGHFARE FEE ADT's/UNITS: ___ _ or:. FACILITIES MANAGEMENT FEE SQ.FT.:(i /,CJ(,~ )ZJ ffi.sEWER FEE PERMIT No. __ _ EDU's: .{p t> 4 t X FEE/ADT: d ~' x· FEE/ADT: ZONE;: 0 X FEE/SO.FT.: 11 4D X FEE/EDU: LgtJ(o BENEFIT AREA: ~ DRAINAGE BASIN: SL EDU's: (a .. 4--::J. X FEE/EDU: 1{a ~RAINA~E FEES PLDA ~ HIGH>< /LOW ACRES: /o 53 X FEE/AC: 4 / ,3 f..r, i!1~WER LATERAL ($2,500 DEPOSIT) ~WATER FEE EDl,J's: fuo 4-7 X FEE/EDU: cK 1 400 =$ z-rO =$ 41/3{p =$ ~ =$ <g) '7 g5 =$ L6 b 21 S =$ 4-q pl_ =$ b7 I~ ;Jg' =$ --er =$ L5l5dt TOTAL OF ABOVE FEES*: $ 4(.,, Cf 5-± *NOTE: Thia calculation sheet la NOT a complete llat of all feu which may be due. Dedications and Im rovements ma . •lso t;,e required with Building Permits. P:\DOCS\MISFORMS\BP0002;FRM REV 01/04/95 .. ..: .... TO: FROM: .. DATE: Cit DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING SERVICES ENGINEERING INSPECTION DIVISION 2.-22-96 ROUGH GRADING.APPROVAL FOR PROJECT NO. G:P9500IO, PIP 95-02· (P.E. OR TRACT#) . · ' DOM/11/E Pi?ESS /949 KELLCJGG,Lf(/£ . . .(PROJECT NAME & ADDRESS} J_ _ f/4/J//AIUAJ (:Qlf)5Tt</JCT/OAI 475 i3R4Dll:Y 411£ /;L {!4/0N 92020 .(DEVELOPER'S NAME & ADDRESS) . We have inspected the grading for Lot/ 44 . or Phase - of the above mentioned project. In addition, we have received rough grading certification from CTE , //JC. , the Soils Engineer, dated 2-21-96 and from 6Pf:,L/R .t A550{!.i47E6 , the Supervision Grading Engineer, . dated 2-/7-96 ,1 and are satisfied that the rough grading has _been completed in accordance with City Standards. Based on these certifications and our observation, we take no exception to the issuance of a bui,ld~ng permit for Lo~ 44-_ , . or Phase · -of project _ [}()MIit!/€ P~ESS -from a grading standpoint. This release, however, is not intended to certify the project from other engineering concerns including site development, water or __ sewer availability, or final grading. We will need tb be advised ptior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy so that we can verify that final _grading and landscaping has been completed in accordance with the approved pltm;r the proj_ect. APPROVED: PROJECT GRADING INSPECTOR SR. CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR H:\LIBRARY\DPS\WPDATA\INSPEC1\ROUGGRAD.FOR 2075 Las Palmas Drive • Carlsbad, Cal'ifornia 92009-1576 • (619) 438-1161 © l . I . I ! I l I l ( f r ·j l ! i f i ! I . ! Ii I ,-' ,, ., . PROJECT INSPECTOR: _ 1) /JJO{),{!£ PROJECT ID />//J 95-02. LOTS REQU!;STED FOR RELEASE:· NIA = NOT APPLICABLE ,/=COMPLETE o = Incomplete or unacceptable 1st '2nd. 44- ' ••' ~ ,'"•• -•I ' ,. y _y· 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Site access to requested lots adequate and logically grouped Site erosion control measures adequate. 'I 'I NA 'I. y· : NA· '/ 8. 9. Overall site adequate for health, safety and welfare of public. Letter of request for partial release submitted 8½• x 11 • site plan showing requested lots submitted. Compaction report from soils engineer submitted. E!ngineer of work certification of work done and pad elevations. Geologic engineer's letter rt unusual geologic or subsurface conditions exist. Project conditions of approval checked for conflicts · /_ 1 o. Can water service be installed prior to bringing building combustibles on site. · · ~ Partial release of grading forthe above stated lots is approved for the purpose of puilding · permit issuance. Issuance of building permits Is still subject to all normal City requirements required pursuant to the building permit process. D Partial release of the site is denied forlhe following reasons: · 2:22-96 Project Inspector Date Project Engineer Date ·~·~ · S~ Inspector · lf:bt Date -H:\LWR,.\.RY\ENG\WPDA TA\ INSPECT\!'ORMS\P ARTSITE l'RM ,, l :. --l ~ /· t .. ~i ~ 1 ~ •. -~ " ) .· .· I ' ~ ' ·, i .. _:· ':.··.1 ' ' . -:-i ~ ·: ': . .. ~-. ; ::, ·:< ! . : i ..... ·l ' ~ i ' l •, -'~ J ••w• " .. .. .. • • Q Q q~1 .t .t ; ~ --ail ... l " .c <.I i i .... .: .. • -• Q I .t ; --·1 w i: -. .. PLANNING OiEOCLlST Plan Check No._;§-1~11 . Address ICfl/9 Kello~ Avf,,. Planner DAVID RICK Phone 4w.1161 ext. _4_3_28 ___ _ (Name) APN: ----.Q.t.u:..:ll:....--~oq..!.:l2..__-...;;,0~3 ____ ........., ________ _ TY?e of Project ~d Use f\}Qi,J .leti.J. BIJ.a Zone Pro Facilities Management Zon7 ___ s: ____ _ ao~out) # l · · ~cle (If propert}' in, c~mplete SPECIAL TAX CALCULATION WORKSHEET provided by Building Department.) (21 rtem Complete (9 [tem rncomplete. Needs your action 1, 2, 3 Number in circle indicates plancheck number where deficiency was. identified Co)~ D EnviroQmmtal R.mew ~ YES /4o -m>E R:miAre~ F-r PIP {,(,.,e,_J,...~.,... r~h~ ·DATE OF COMPLETION: _____ /_/ -...... __ ) !.J __ -_Cf,.........,j_--__________ _ Compliance with conditions of approval? [f -not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval __ ...,...__.....,__..,........_, ___________________ _ c§@o Disc:reticmary Action~ YES LNo _ TYPE p,P Cei~1,,J..,,,J ;, r,,J,'<o) APPROVAL/RESO. NO. f)n~,P,c. DATE: / -/ b -C/'fz PROJECT NO. PIP q,r -j__o{) OtHER RELATED CASES: ___ . ___________________ _ • <;ompliance -with conditions 'of ap~roval? [f not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of· Approval · ~) 251 )3 1 l;1 J I Z OATE OF APPROVAL: ---------------------- . San Dieso Coast District. 3111 Camino Del Rio North, .Suite 200, San Dieso, CA. 92108-1725 (619) 521·8036 Compliance with· conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval-------------------------- -~ 0 lnclusioaary Housing Fee ~--YES_ NO L (Effective date of rndusionary Housing. Ordinance . May 21, 1993.) Site Plan: o tio 0 rsao Zoninr, Ol32IO 1. 2. 1. 2. 3. 4. Provide a fully dimensio~ed site plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way width, dimensioned setbacks and existing topographical lines. Provide legal description of pro~, and assessor's parcel number. Setbacks: Front: [nt. Side: Street Side: · Rear: Lot coverage: Height: Parking: Required Required Required Required Required Required Spaces Required Guest Spaces Required CJAQ{\ ' -::32)) 3 1.-/-r } Shown Jl) J Shown JO I -Shown ;:?5' Shown S"lj·' s-o~shown 37~ 35J Shown 'q~ '3 ,, Si Shown s-1::/_ -Shown OK TO [SSUE AND EN'FEREDAPPROVAL INTO COMPUTER. .iH/eJs DATE #fe,(?t, ---.---- PLNCK.FRM City -of Carlsbad. . _· 95074 Fire Department • Bureau of Prevention Plan Review: Requirements Category: Building Plan Check Date of Report: Tuesday, December 19; 1995 Reviewed by: ~./-<:J Contact Name Ken Smith Address 435 w. Bradley Av City, State El Cajon CA 92020 Bldg, Dept. No. 95-1811 Planning No. Job Name Dominie Press Inc Job Address _1...,.9_49_K_e_I1o_,9...,9.__ ________ --,-___ _ Ste. or Bldg. No. ____ _ ·181 Approved -The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans; information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifica- tions, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. D Disapproved -Please see the attached report of deficiencies. Please make corrections to plans or specifications necessary to indicate compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. For Fire Department Use Only Review 1st'----'---2nd. __ _ 3rd._. -- Other Agency ID CFD JQb# , 95074 File# ___ _ 2560 Orion Way • Carlsbad, California 92008 • (619) 931-2121 City of Carlsbad 95074 Fire Department • Bureau of Prevention General ,Comments: Date of Report: Tuesday, December 19, 1995 t' Contact Name Ken Smith Address . 435 w. Bradley Av City~ State El Cajon CA 92020 Bldg. Dept. No. 95-1811 Planning No. _____ _ Job Name Dominie Press Inc Job Address 1949 Kellogg ----------------Ste. or Bldg. No. ____ _ STORAGE HEIGHT SHALL NOT EXCEED 12 FEET. FIRE EXTINGUISHERS SHALL BE WITHIN 50 FEET OF TRAVEL DISTANCE IN WAREHOUSE AREA. 2560 Orion Way , • Carlsbad, California 92008 • (619) 931-2121 SEE STRUCTURAL CALCS ·SCANNED SEPARATELY CoNSTRUCTION TusTING & ENGINF;ERING, INC. ESCONDIDO • MODESTO • CORONA • OXNARD • RENO • SEATTLE 241<1 VINEY ARO SteG 3540OAKDALERO SteA2 490E.PRINCELANDCI #7 1645 PACJflC AVE.#105 32GLENCARRANCR. 30') S.CLOVERDALE-D30 FSCONDIDO, CA92029 MODESTO, CA95355 CORONA, CA 91719 OXNARD, CA 93033 SPARKS, NV 89431 SEATILE. WA 98108 (619) 746-4955 (20'}) 551-2271 (909) 371-1890 (805) 486-6475 (702) 331-0503 (206) 767-1820 FAX (619) 746-9806 FAX (20'}) 551-3593 FAX (909) 371-2168 FAX (805) 486-9016 FAX (702) 331-2667 FAX (206) 762--8751 October 9, 1995 CTE)ob No. 101117 Hamann Construction 475 West Bradley Avenue El Cajon, CA 92020 Attention: Mr. Paul Joseph Subject: References: Mr. Joseph: Additional Geotechnical Recommendations-Building Reconfiguration Dominie Press, Inc. Lot 44' Airport Business Centre, Unit 2 Kellogg Avenue, Carlsbad, California Geotechnical Evaluation and Recommendations Proposed Commercial Development Lot 44 Airport Business Centre, Unit 2 Carlsbad, California Prepared by Construction Testing & Engineering, Inc. Dated March 2_2; 1995, Revised May 24, 1995 G;rading Plans for Lot 44, Map No. 11288 Prepared by Municipal Engineers Dated March 13, 1995 Revised September 25, 1995 We have reviewed the revised project plans with respect to site soii condirions and have provided the following geotechnical recomme1;1dations. Based on revised-plan review the structure is to be enlarged by extending the structure southward approximately 90 feet beyond original building limits. The project geotechnical investigation by Construction Testing & Engineering, Inc. (March 22, 1995), indicates that the southern building expansion area of the site is underlain by cut natur~l soils or shallow fill. As-graded information indicates that the originally proposed structure area is underlain by" r~c.orripacte~ .ftll.. ~ , . . -_: .. ·.<" . . . . :· "0 • • • • • • ' • • • 4,. •.2~ • • : • ••• In order to minimizt! eff~-cts\ir differential bearing conditions, it is recommended that the proposed southeni building area be overexcavated and recompacted as outlined in the project geotechnical report. As such, excavation should be performed to a depth of 2' below deepest footing or 3' below pad grade (whichever is deeper), and laterally 5' beyond proposed building limits. CA q5/ flt GEOTECHNICAL AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING TESTING AND INSPECTION Hamann Construction October 9, 1995 Page Two Overexcavation and recompaction operations should be observed and tested by the geotechnical representative to verify that conditions are as anticipated. Foundation recommendations, for the anticipated structural loading imposed on the properly recompact~d fill, are provided in the referenced geotechnical report. If you should have any questio~ regarding these recommendations please contact the undersigned at your convenience. Respectfully submitted, CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. M,,[(½ff/ ~ney D. Ballard, GE #2173 Geotechnical Engineering Manager ··:Im cc: File/Copy/1011-17..OCT /l ' £\'01~ Jay Lynch, CEG #1890 En ering Geologist CoNSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. ESCONDIDO • MODESTO . CORONA . OXNARD . RENO SEATTLE 2414VINEYARD. SteG 35400AKDALE Rll Ste A2 490 E. PRINCELAND CT #7 1645 PACIAC AVE. #105 32 GLEN CARRAN CR 30'J S. CLOVERDALE-030 ESCONDJOO, CA 92029 MODESTO, CA 95355 CORONA, CA 91719 OXNARD. CA 93033 SPARKS, NV 89431 SEATILE, WA98108 ENGINEERING, INC. (619) 7464955 (200) 551-2271 (909) 371-1890 (805) 486-6475 (702) 33 l -0503 (206) 767-1820 FAX (619) 746-9806 FAX (200) 551-3593 FAX (90')) 371-2168 FAX (805) 486-9016 FAX (702) 331-2667 FAX (206) 762-8751 November 20, 1995 CTE Job No. 101117 Dominie Press Inc. 5945 Pacific Center, Suite 505 San Diego_, CA 92121 Subject: Referenced Additional Geotechnical Recommendations Proposed Commercial Building -Dominie Press Lot 44, Airport Business Center, Unit 2 Carlsbad, California Report: Geotecbnical Evaluation and Recommendations Proposed ·Commercial Development Gentlemen: Lot 44, Airport Business Center, Unit 2 Carlsbad, California Prepared by Constrnction Testing & Engineering, Inc. Dated March 22, 1995, Report 101117 Pursuant to the request of the project architect we have prepared additional geotechnical recommendations and clarification for the subject project. Foundation Setback \Ve und.erst.and revisions to the proposed building orientation and footprint will situate the structure near the crest of downward trending slopes. Footings near slope faces should be deepened such that the horizontal distance from the slope face jg a minimum of 10 feet or one- half the slope height, whichever is greater. GEOTECHNICAL AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING TESTING AND INSPECTION Dominie Press Inc. November 20, 1995 PagG Two PCC Pavement Our previous letter dated July 7, 1995 provided recommendations for concrete pavement thicknesses at auto and truck areas. For the stated traffic, the recommended pavement thickness at truck ateas would l;>e considered an appropriate section for use at loading dock areas. Should you have any questions or need further information please do not hesitate -to contact this office. CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. -~~ Rodney D. iallard, GE-#2173 ~ Gcotechnical Engineering Manager ' ,. .UH cc: (1) Mr. Dave Ambler Ken Smith Architects 435 West Bradley El Cajon, CA 9202 Via Facsimile 442-2699 (1) File/Copy/101117 .NOV Sean Colorado, -#54033 Project Engineer ,, :l J J 1 1 J l j _J ·1 ] l j _] j J .J J .. ,-. ;; •., fW{" CMec-f:-!f-?S-IB>lt CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC.· ESCONDIDO • :MODESTO • CORONA -• OXNARD • RENO • SEATILE 2414 VINEYARnSicG 3S40OAKDALE!9} SICA2 490RPRINCELANDCI#7 J645PACIF1CAVE.#J05 32GLENCARRANCR. 30'JS.CLOVERDALE-D30 ESCONDIOO,CA92029 MODESTO,CAf5355 CORONA,CA91719 OXNARD,CA93033 SPARKS,NV89431 SEATILE,WA98108 (619) 7~955 (209) 551-2271 (90')) 371-1890 (805) 486-6475 (702) 331-0503 (206) 767-1820 FAX (619) 746-9806 FAX (209) 551-3593 FAX (90')) 371:2168 FAX (805) 486-9016 FAX (702) 331-2667 FAX (206) 762-8751 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS PROPOSED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT LOT 44, AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTRE, UNIT 2 CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA PREPARED FOR: DOMINIE PRESS INC. 5945 PACIFIC CENTER BOULEY ARD SUITE 505 SAN DIEGO, CA 92121 PREPARED BY: CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. 2414 VINEY ARD AVENUE, SUITE G ESCONDIDO, CA 92029 CTE JOB NO. 101117 March 22, 1995 GEOTECHNICAL AND CONSTRU<:;TiON ENGINEERING TESTING AND INSPECTION .j l t: CoNSTRUCTION TE~TING & ENGINEERING, INc.- 1 ESCONDIDO • MODESTO • CORONA • OXNARD • RENO • SEATI'LE 2414 VINEY ARD. Src G 3540 OAKDA1$ R,D Src A2 490 E. PRINCELANDCT #7 1645 PACIF1C A VE #105 32 GLEN CARRAN CR. 30'J s. CLOVERDALB-O30 ] ENGINEERING, INC. ESCONDIDO, CA 92029 MODESTO,CA~355 CORONA, CA91719 OXNARD, CA 93033 SPARKS, NV 89431 SEATil..E. WA98108 (619) 746-4955 (209) 551-2271 (909) 371-1890 (805) 486-6475 (702) 331-0503 (206) 767-1820 FAX (619) 746-9806 FAX (209) 551-3593 FAX (909) 371°2168 FAX (805) 486-9016 FAX (702) 331-2667 FAX (206) 762-8751 } ] ] '} l J _] l ] J . l I ] j March 22, 1995 Dominie Press Inc. 5945 Pacific Center Boulevard Suite 505 San Diego, CA 92121 Attention: Mr. Raymond Yuen Subject: References: Mr. Yuen: Geotechnical Evaluation and Recommendations Proposed Commercial Development Lot 44, Airport Business Centre, Unit 2 Carlsbad, California Geotechnical Report of Rough Grading Airport Business Centre, Unit 2 Carlsbad, California Prepared by ICG Incorporated Dated April 21,· 1993 CTE Job No. 101117 As per your request, we have performed a geotechnical evaluation of the subject site in order to provide geotechnical recommendations for the proposed site development. The purpose of our report was to evaluate previously documented earthwork activity which occurred within the influence area of the site as part of rough grading activities for the Airport Business Center, Unit 2. Our recommendations are based on site reconnaissance, limited site exploration, reference review, and proposed site usage. The opportunity to be of service is appreciated. If you have any questions regarding our recommendations, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Respectfully submitted, th-f. ~~ Rodney D. Ballard, GE #2173 Geotechnical Engineer RDB:lm cc: File/Copy/101117.REP GEOTECHNICAL AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINJj;ERING TESTING AND INSPECTION 1 'r. f I l j ] J J l 1 J j ] ~ -~ j l J' l .l j 1 ] J (Job No. 101117) TABLE OF CONTENTS . PAGE SECTION 1.0 Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2.0 Scope of Services . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.0 Site Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.0 Proposed Development .. . . . . . . . 5.0 Site Investigation . . . . . . . . 6.0 As-Graded Conditions . . . . . . . . . 7.0 Laboratory Testing Program . . . . . . 8.0 Geologic Hazards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~·9.0 Conclusions and Recommendations .. . . . 10.0 Existing Slopes . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11.0 Foundation Recommendations ! . . . . . 12.0 Recommended Pavement Sections . . . . . 13.0 Subgrade Subbase and Aggregate Base . . 14.0 Retainjng Walls . . . . . . 15.0 Additional Construction Observation 16.0 Limitations of Investigation .. . . APPENDIX A: REFERENCES APPENDIX B: FlELD INVESTIGATION APPENDIX C: LABORATORY RESULTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . • . . . . .. APPENDIX D: REFERENCE GEOTECHNiCAL REPORT . . 1 . . . . 2 . . . . 2 . . . . 3 . . 4 . . . . 4 . . . 5 . . 9 . . 12 . . . 13 . . . 16 .. . 17 .. . 17 . . . 19 . 20 _, J : ' 1 1 l J 1 j ! d _j 1 1 J J l ] J {, ::; Geotechnical Evaluation and Recommendations Proposed Commercial Development Lot 44, Airport Business Centre, Unit 2 March 22, 1995 1.0 BACKGROUND Page 1 CTE Job No. 101117 The site consists of a mass graded lot on Kellogg Avenue within the Airport Business Centre, Unit 2 in Carlsbad, California. Based on reference review, rough grading of the business park was generally performed during the period of September, 1989 through April, 1990. As-graded data indicates that all fill areas were compacted to at least 90 % of laboratory maximum density. The report also indicates that low to moderately expansive soils are present at finish grade throughout the graded areas. 2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES "· The_ scope of services provided for in this investigation included: 2.1 Subsurface exploration including excavation and field logging of three shallow exploratory borings; 2.2 Geologic and soils engineering analysis of field data and laboratory data, which provide the basis for our conclusioJJS and recommendations; 2.3 Review of readily available geotechnical and geologic reports pertinent to rough grading <;>f the project site. Reports reviewed are as follows: • Geotechnical Report of Rough Grading, Airport Business Center, Unit 2, Carlsbad, California, prepared by ICG Incorporated, dated April 21, 1993 (Appendix D). 1 < ' l J .1 J ] ] I J _J .] _,_ .•... ] J 1 I J .J ] j .,_·,I•,, •',_ "?· .. Geotechnical Evaluation and Recommendations Proposed Commercial Development Lot 44, Airport Business Centre, Unit 2 March 22, 1995 Page 2 CTE Job No. 101117 2.4 Review of readily available topographic plans regarding previous site grading operations. Plans reviewed are as follows: • Grading Plans for .C. T. 8] .. 46, Unit No. 2, Airport Business Center, Carlsbad, California, prepared by Rick Engineering Company, dated July 25, 1990. 2.5 Preparation of this report presenting our findings, conclusions, and recommendations pertaining to the soil engineering aspects of the proposed site developments. 3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION Topographically, the site is flatly graded with approximately 2: 1 (horizontal:vertical) slopes along the north, south, west and east boundaries of the site area. An approximate 15 foot high ascending slope is situated along the east boundary. The descending slope which extends across the north portion of the site tapers from a height of 2 feet at the east boundary to approximately 20 feet at the west boundary. The descending slope along the west boundary is approximately 20 feet high. The descending slope which extends across the south portion of the site varies from a height of approximately 30 feet at the east boundary to approximately 20 feet at the west boundary. 4.0 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Based on conceptual site layout information, proposed development is to consist of the construction a single-story or two-story commercial/industrial concrete tilt-up structure with associated parking/drive area and utilities . J ;' l j 1 ] ] J J _I ] ] J ! J j 1 J J -., / ,C .. ~ ,· ,· GeotechnicaJ Evaluation and Recommendations Proposed Commercial Development Lot 44, Airport Business Centre, Unit 2 March 22, 1995 5.0 SITE INVESTIGATION Page3 CTE Job No. 101117 The site investigation was conducted by a Construction Testing & Engineering, Inc. staff geologist on March 2, 1995. The investigation consisted of a surficial reconnaissance and limited subsurface exploration. The subsurface exploration was performed with a hand-operated, General 440 auger powerhead, using a four inch diameter continuous flight auger. A total of three exploratory borings were drilled. The borings were excavated to evaluate the shallow subsurface geology. Boring logs Figures Bl through B3 in Appendix B contain geologic descriptions of materials logged by our -personnel. Figure 2, "Boring Location and Site Plan", depicts the approximate boring locations. Disturbed and relatively undisturbed samples of the subsurface soils were obtained from each boring for laboratory analysis. Relatively undisturbed samples of the subsurface soils were obtained using a hand-driven, thin walled sampler (1.88-inch inside diameter, 2.0-inch outside diameter). The samples were retained and carefully sealed in plastic bags for shipment to the laboratory. -· J , .. ' 1 \• l ] ' ] ] ] l J ] __ ·l J J ] . l J J ·]' .· .. J }; .. ~ _.,.,. :·,, .. '/: :,, . ''-f, .. , - Geotechnicc\l Evc\luation and Recommendations Proposed Commercial Development Lot 44, Airport Business Centre, Unit 2 March 22, 1995 6.0 AS-GRADED CONDITIONS Page 4 CTE Job No. 101117 As indicated in the referenced report, mass grading was performed using conventional techniques to produce the level building pad. Mass grading was generally con9-ucted from the period of September, 1989 through April, 1990. Site exploration and review of the reference rough grading plan indicates that a cut/fill transition transects the site (Figure 2). Based on historical topographic data, the northwest portion of the site is believed to be underlain by 25 feet of fill, while the southeast portion of the pad was cut from native formational materials, As-graded reporting indicates that fill materials were compacted to 90 % relative compaction. Rock fills, derived from nearby blasting, were reported to have been placed within the lower portion of deep compacted fills . 7.0 LABORATORY TESTING PROGRAM Laboratory tests were conducted on representative soil samples for the purpose of classification, and determination of their physical properties and engineering characteristics. The testing program included in-place moisture content, expansion potential, R-Value, particle size analysis, and Atterberg limits. Appendix C contains -descriptions of the test methods and summaries of the results ... -· I _--, • 1, t J 1 l J ~j l ] \ J 1 j 1 Geotechnical Evaluation and Recommendations Proposed Commercial Development Lot 44, Airport Business-Centre, Unit 2 March 22, 1995 8.0 GEOLOGIC HAZARDS 8.1 Faulting. and Seismicity Page 5 CTE Job No. 101117 Based on site reconnaissance, information from our exploratory borings, and a review of pertinent geologic literature, it is our opinion that the site is not located on any active fault traces. The Rose Canyon Fault, located approximately 7.5 miles west of the site is the closest known active fault. An active fault is defined by the California Division ofMines and Geology (CDMG) as a fault with evidence of activity during the Holocene (approximately the last 11,000 years). Other nearby active faults are the San Clemente Fault Zone (approximately 55 miles to the southwest); the Elsinore and San Jacinto Faults (approximately 22 and 45 miles to the northeast); and the San Andreas Fault (approximately 65 miles to the east-northeast). The Table below is a summary of the principal regional faults considered most likely to rupture and possibly induce strong ground shaking at the site during the useful life of the proposed construction. Included in the Table is a summary of each fault's seismic characteristics. r ·l. I ' I J l l ~.(,-' ~-. . I I l ] _j J •><· I J 1 J J j J ·. J -~~: :, ~? .. ~ ~.;~~~):~;-:: Geotecbnical Evaluation and Recommendations Proposed Commercial Development Lot 44, Airport Business Centre, Unit 2 March 22, 1995 FAULT ZONE Rose Canyon San Jacinto San Andreas San Clemente Elsinore ESTIMATED DISTANCE AND DIRECTION FROM SITE (miles) 7.5W 45 NE 65NE 55SW 22NE ESTIMATED PROBABLE EARTHQUAKE MAGNITUDE (1) 7.0 7.5 8.3 6.7 7.5 PEAK BEDROCK ACCELERATION (in G-forccs)(2) 0.43 0.12 0.09 0.05 0.27 1. Sei~mic Safety Study, City of San Diego (1974) & Bonilla (1970) 2. Seed and Idriss (1982) 3.-Ploessel and Slosson (1974) Page 6 CTE Job No. 101117 REPEATABLE HIGH GROUND ACCELERATION (m G-forccs)(3) 0.28 0.12 0.09 0.05 0.27 We have analyzed the possible bedrock accelerations at the site. For the intended use, it is our opinion that the most significant seismic event would be a 7. 0 moment magnitude earthquake on the Rose Canyon Fault Zone. This event could produce estimated peak bedrock accelerations of 0.43g and repeatable high grol.lild accelerations of 0.28g. 8.2 Liquefaction Evaluation Liquefaction occurs when saturated fine-grained sands, clays, or silts lose their physical strengths during earthquake induced shaking and behave as a liquid. This is due to loss of point-to-point grain cpntact and tr~ter of normal stress to the pore water. Liquefaction potential is a funGtio.11 J " ' [' l J l j l l ] ~j ) ] J j J ] ] )• }_ Geotechnical Evaluation and Recommendations Proposed Commercial Development Lot 44, Airport Business Centre, Unit 2 March 22, 1995 Page 7 CTE Job No. 101117 of water level, soil type, material gradation, relative density, and probable intensity and duration of ground shaking. Because of the dense nature of onsite materials and the anticipated lack of shallow groundwater the potential for liquefaction at the site should be considered low. 8.3 Seismic Settlement Evaluation Seismic settlement occurs when loose to medium dense granular soils densify during seismic events. The native Scripps Formation materials were found to be dense to very dense with significant fine grained binder materials (silts and clays) and are not considered likely to experi,ence significant seismic settlement. We believe the potential for seismic settlement resulting ·fu ·structural damage should be considered low. 8.4 Tsunamis and Seiche Evaluation The site is located approximately 4 miles east of the Pacific Ocean at an elevation of approximately 290 feet and is therefore most likely not subject to tsunami related damage. No significant bodies of water ate located in the immediate site vicinity which could induce seiche damage. I l ]. l 1 I f l l ] -~l ,j I ] ] J ! ] . J ) ,L -.,;Jt,,. .' Geotecbnical EvaJµation and Recommendations Proposed Commercial Development Lot 44, Airport Business Centre, Unit 2 March 22, 1995 8.5 l..andsliding Page 8 CTE Job No. 101117 Potential site specific deep-seated landsliding hazards were mitigated during the mass grading operations. Landsliding is therefore not considered ,a significant hazard within or immediately adjacent to the proposed building area. 8.6 Compressible Soils Based on geologic observation and laboratory testing, Scripps Formation materials exhibit low compressibility characteristics and are considered suitable for structure support. Within fill areas, the upper 3 feet was generally found to be relatively loose and deemed to be moderately to highly compressible. Fill matetials underlying the upper 3 feet were found to be moderately dense to dense exhibiting low compressibility characteristics.· 8. 7 Expansive Soils Soils encountered during the subsurface investigation were generally found to consist of silty and clayey sand exhibiting moderate expansion potential. Disturbed surface soils exhibited signs of minor desiccation cracking indicative of the tendency of the soil to experience moderate seasonal shrink~ge or swell. Recommendations for earthwork and foundation construction are presented m Sections 9.0 artd 11.0 of this report. ] 1 J _j J J J j .} 1 J .;.:.r_·!--·" Geotechnical Evaluation and Recommendations Proposed Commercial Development Lot 44, Airport Business Centre, Unit 2 March 22, 1995 Page 9 CTE Job No. 101117 9.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on our geotechnical investigation, it is our opinion that the proposed development is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint provided the following recommendations are incorporated into the design and construction of the subject project. The following sections discuss the principal geotechnical concerns affecting proposed development, grading, and foundation design recommendations which should be implemented during site construction. 9 .1 Site Preparation Prior to grading, the site s~ould be cleared of loose soil, debris, and vegetation. Vegetation and depris should be disposed of off site. 9.2. Compacted Fills Areas to receive fill and/ or other surface improvements should be scarified to a depth of approximately 12 inches, brought to near optimum moisture content~ and recompacted to at least 90 percent relative colllpaction (based on ASTM D1557). Fill placement should be performed in lifts of uniform depth. The optimum lift thickness to produce a uniformly compacted fill will depend on the type and size of compaction equipment used. In general, fill should be placed in uniform compacted lifts not exceeding 8 inches in ] f l l 1 ., ~1 J 1 1 J _j I J i 1 .l J j ] .. •'• J ) < Geotecbnical Evaluation and Recommendations Proposed Commercial Development Lot 44, Airport Business Centre, Unit 2 March 22, 1995 Page 10 CTE Job No. 101117 thickness. Fill soils should be placed at a minimum of 90 percent relative compaction (based on ASTM D 1557) at a water content between optimum and optimum plus 4 percent. Placement and compaction of fill should be performed in accordance with local grading ordinances under the observation and testing of the geotechnical consultant.. Fill soils (imported and on-site) should be granular with 100 percent of the material less than 6 inches in maximum dimension. Fill soils placed within 3 feet of finish grade should have an expansion index less than or equal to 60 {per UBC 29-2). 9.3 Treatment of Transition Conditions Based on our understanding of the proposed site development, we do not anticipate the proposed building will span a cut/fill transition. Preliminary site layout information indicates that the proposed building will be situated over fill materials ·estimated to extend from 15 feet to 25 feet below the rough graded pad elevation. To mitigate the potential for compression of loose soils and to provide a uniformly compacted structural mat beneath the proposed building, we recommend the building pad be over excavated a minimrun of three feet, or two feet below the deepest footing, whichever is greater. Overexcavation of the building pad area should extend laterally a minimum of 5 feet beyond the proposed building limits. 9.4 Trench Excavation and Backfill The on-site soils may generally be suitable as trench backfill provided they are screened of . material over 6 inch~s in.diameter a~d organic;. 11:1a~ter. ~rencJ;i.backfill should be compacteq. in . . '• . ·. . .. . . . .-.. ,' l )! ' f' l 1 ,_) 1 I ] l l -J-- _] ] ] J 1 J J 1 ] J "--·---~. Geotechnical Evaluation and Recommendations Proposed Commercial Development Lot 44, Airport Business Centre, Unit 2 March 22, 1995 Page 11 CTE Job No. 101117 uniform lifts (not exceeding 8 inches in compacted thickness) by mechanical means to at least 90 percent relative compaction (ASTM D1557). 9 .5 Temporary Construction Slopes Provided below are sloping recommendations for unshored temporary excavations. The recommended slopes should be relatively stable against deep seated failure, but may experience localized sloughing. The recommended slopes are based on the assumption that excavation side walls will be comprised of moderately cemented silty sandstone or previously disturbed cohesive soils. Moderately cemented silty sandstone and previously disturbed cohesive soil are considered to be type "B" as defined by Cal-OSHA: Sloping of type "B" soils are set forth in the following table. RECOMMENDED SLOPE RATIOS ·~~~~~~~~~~~~ B 1:1 (MAX.) 20 FT Actual field conditions and soil type designations must be verified by a "competent person" while excavations exist in accoqlanct: with Cal-OSHA regulatio~. Also, the above sloping ,' l l l j _, l ] ] J ] j j r J ..... -· .. ..4-.,' •• Geotechnical Evaluation and Recommendations Proposed Compiercial Development Lot 44, Airport Business Centre, Unit 2 March 22, 1995 Page 12 CTE Job No. 101117 recommendations do not allow for surcharge loading -at the top of slopes by equipment or materials. Appropriate surcharge setback must be maintained from the top of all unshored slopes. 10.0 EXISTING SLOPES Existing site slopes were examined and evaluated based on observed soil conditions and grading methods described. in the as-built report. Presently, existing site slopes consist of approximately 2 to 1 (horizontal to vertical) cut slopes along the east and south boundaries and 2: 1 (horizontal:vertical) fill slopes along the north and west boundaries (Figure 2). We recommend that all peonanent slopes, cut and fill, be graded at a maximum slope of 2: 1. Evaluation using the Janbu method and conservative estimated soil parameters of.</> = 30° and C = 150 psf indicate a factor of safety in excess of 1.5 for the existing slopes. Although graded and existing slopes on this site should be grossly stable, the soils will be somewhat erodible. Therefore, runoff water should not be permitted to drain over the edges of slopes unless that water is confmed to properly designed and constructed drainage facilities . Additionally, slopes should be planted and maintained with erosion resistant vegetation. Typically soils along the top portion of a fill slope face will tend to creep laterally. We do not recommend distress sensitive hardscape improvements be constructed within five feet of slope crests. in fill areas. _, .. ~-·. ._ -.::::,. '. --: _;_ l l , J l ·\ j ] ] I J J l ] ] ·1 j l J J J ' ' ' Geotechnical Evaluation and Recommendations Proposed Commercial Development Lot 44, Airport Business Centre, Unit 2 March 22, 1995 11.0 FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS 11.1 General Page 13 CTE Job No. 101117 The following recommendations are for preliminary planning purposes only. Additional :fme grading as recommended herein is anticipated prior to site development. Foundation recommendations should be reviewed after completion of earthwork and review of laboratory testing of near surface soils when grading is complete. Specific structural information was not available at the time of this report. However, based on our experience, it is anticipated that structural loads will be on the otder of 125 kips maximum loads for columns and 5.0 kips per lineal foot for walls. In the event the above assumptions are not correct, the conclusions ana recommendations contained in this report shall not be considered valid unless reviewed and modified. 11. 2 Foundations -Spread Footings The recommended design parameters are for spread footings bearing on properly compacted fill material. Preliminary design parameters are outlined in the following chart: J l J · J l ] l J _j l ) ) J 1 J: ·. J .. Geotechnical Evaluation and Recommendations Proposed Commercial Development Lot 44, Airport Business Centre, Unit 2 March 22, 1995 Page 14 CTE Job No. 101117 =~-=-== Continuous 18 2500 0.35 300 5,500 Isolated 18 2500 0.35 300 5,500 Toe minimum width recommended for all footings is 18 'inches. All continuous footings should be reinforced with a minimum of two No. 5 reinforcing bars, top and bottom. All footing depths should be measured from_ the lowest adjacent ground surface or pad grade, whichever is lowest. The bearing values indicated above are for the total of dead plus live loads and may be increased by a maximum of one third for short duration loading which includes the effects of wind or seismic forces. When combining passive pressure and friction for lateral resistance, the passive component should be reduced by one third. 11.3 Foundation Settlement The potential for foundation settlement should be analyzed once foundation loads are known. In general, for the previously stated column and wall loads the maximum settlement is expected to be le~s· than l'l 4 · inch in 25 fe¢t. · . .. . .. . .• . • .. I ~ _J 1 ] _J I J J Geotechnical Evaluation and Recommendations Proposed Commercial Development Lot 44, Airport Business Centre, Unit 2 March 22, 1995 11.4 Concrete Slab-On-Grade Page 15 CTE Job No. 101117 Concrete slabs-on-grade should be at least 4 inches thick for light industrial loads. As a miniinum, concrete slabs should be reinforced with No. 3 reinforcing bars on 18 inch centers. All slab reinforcement should be properly supported to ensure placement near mid-height of the concrete. All slab areas should be underlain by a ~um of two inches of clean sand (Sand Equivalent > 30). Special design consideration should be given to the type of business, and the building intended use. Heavy machinery or vehicular loads may require thicker slab and increased reinforcement. In moisture sensitive floor areas, slabs should be underlain by a vapor barrier consisting of a minimum of six mil polyethylene sheeting or equivalent membrane with all laps sealed. This membrane should be placed over an inch of clean sand and covered with a minimum of one inch of sand to protect the sheeting during concrete placement operations. 11. 5 Foundation Setback Based on the proposed building orientation, it is our understanding that the building's foundation will not be constructed within 10 feet of any downward trending slopes. Footings for buildings should be designed such that the minimum horizontal distance from the top of adjacent slope to the outer edge of the footing is one-half of the slope height to a maximum value of 15 feet. l ? ; 1 J 1 J ] 1 J _j ] ,&:1-"';., ..... •• J: , ·' J .I ~!-.. I _j ··1 . '1 J Geotechnical Evaluation and Recommendations Proposed Commercial Development Lot 44, Airport Business Centre, Unit 2 March 22, 1995 Page 16 CTE Job No. 101117 12.0 RECOMMENDED PAVEMENT SECTIONS Preliminary pavement sections presented below are based on representative area "R" Value data. The pavement design is based on California Department of Transportation Highway Manual and on traffic indexes as indicated below: Truck 6.0 15 3,5 11 6 9 Drive/ Loading · Areas Auto Parking Areas 4.5 15 2.5 8 . 6 6 Upon completion of fmish grading, "R" Value sampling and testing of subgrade soils should be conducted and pavement section modified if necessary. PCC pavement should be reinforced with a minimum of no. 4 reinforcing bars at 24 inches on center, placed within the middle one-third of the slab section. Concrete used for pavement areas should possess a minimum 500 psi modulus of rupture. , . -· . .. •' j, ;. ·< 1 j -1 l j ~' ] ] J I i ' .,/ l l J Geotechnical Evaluation and Reconimendations Proposed. Commercial Development Lot 44, Airport Business Centre, Unit 2 March 22, 1995 Page 17 CTE Job No. 101117 13.0 SUBGRADE SUBBASE AND AGGREGATE BASE All aggregate base materials and subgrade materials where asphalt is to be placed on grade should be compacted to a minimum relative -compaction of 95 percent of the laboratory standard. The upper 12 inches of subgrade beneath pavement areas should also be compacted to 95 percent relative compaction at 1 to 3 percent above optimum moisture content. Where light, distress-sensitive, hardscape -improvements are proposed, we recommend removal of all loose surficial soil. At a minimum, these areas should be scarified to a minimum depth of 12 inches and recompacted to a minimum of 90 percent of the laboratory standard. 14.0 RETAINING WALLS Should retaining walls be constructed at the site, the following guidelines sb,all be employed. Retaining walls that are unrest:rained (free to move at the top), should be designed using the active earth pressure. For restrained walls (the top braced to prevent movement) the at-rest earth pressure should be used. These pressures can be taken as the equivalent fluid pressures, in pounds per cubic foot, given below: .. [ . ' itt :_~ r ] 1 l .,. I I l ] _J ] -· :I J J J .. J I J. J Geotecbnical Evaluation and Recommendations Proposed Commercial Development Lot 44, Airport Business Centre, Unit 2 March 22, 1995 Backfill Type and. Condition Native Soil, Level Backfill Native Soil, 2: 1 J3ackfill Granular Soil, Level Backfill Granular Soil, 2: 1 Backfill Active 70 pcf 90 pcf 35 pcf 55 pcf Page 18 CTE Job No. 101117 At-Rest 90 pcf 120 pcf 60 pcf 95 pcf These pressures depend on the assumption that the soil be~d the wall is compacted to 90 % of maxiiJ?,um dry· density at the optimum moisture content. They also require that no free groundwater be present and that significant surcharge loads not exist within a zone defined by .. a ·one-to-one plane projected back from the base of the wall. In all cases, adequate drains should be placed behind the walls to relieve hydrostatic pressures,. Walls subject to loads should be designed fot the·-equivalent fluid pressures above, plus an additional uniformly distributed pressure caused by the load. Clayey soils with an Expansion Index of 60 or more should not be used as ba~kfill. Project plans should clearly state that use of granular backfill is required where that option has been selected. We should be contacted for specific recolllll1endations if retaining walls on this site do not conform to the assumptions stated above. l ] 1 J I l J _, ] l 1 J J J Geotechnical Evaluation and Recommendations Proposed Commercial Development Lot 44, Airport Business Centre, Unit 2 March 22, 1995 Page 19 CTE Job No. 101117 In addition, we recommend that only light, hand-operated equipment be used to compact backfill behind walls. The backfill should not be over-compacted, as excessive compaction loads will increase earth pressures above the values given above. 14.1 Lateral Resistance To provide resistance for design lateral loads, we recommend using an equivalent passive fluid weight of 300 pcf for footings or grade beams poured neat against properly compacted fill soils. This value assumes a horizontal surface for the soil mass extending at least 10 feet or three times the height of the surface generating passive pressure, w~chever is greater. 15.0 ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION All additional grading should be observed and tested to assure conformance with recommendations presented herein. All footing trenches and foundation reinforcement should be examined prior to concrete placement. it is recommended that the soil engineer review final design drawings to ensure compliance with recommendations provided herein. 16.0 LIMITATIONS OF INVESTIGATION Our investigation was performed using the degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under -- similar circumstances, by reputable Soils Engineers and Geologists practicing in this or similar localities. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the conclusions and · professional advice includ~d in this report. 1 J .J ] l 1 J _J J ] 1 J j J Geotechnical Evaluation and Recommendations Proposed Commercial Development Lot 44, Airport Business Centre, Unit 2 March 22, 1995 Page 20 CTE Job No. 101117 The samples taken and used for testing and the observations made are believed representative of the entire project; however, soil and geologic conditions can vary significantly between boreholes and surface exposures. As in most major projects, conditions revealed by excavation may be in variance with preliminary findings. If this occurs, the changed conditions must be evaluated by the Project Soils Engineer and Geologist and designs adjusted as required or alternate designs recommended. This report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the owner, or of his representative, to ensure that the information and recommendations contained herein are brought to the attention of the architect and engineer for the project and incorporated into the plans, and the necessary steps are taken to see that the contractor and subcontra~tors carry out such recommendations in the field. The findings of this report are valid as of the present date. However, changes in the conditions of a property can occur with the passage of time, whether they be due to natural processes or ~·the works of man on this or adjacent properties. In addition~ changes in applicable or appropriate standards may occur, Whether tb.ey result from legislation or the broadening of knowledge. Accordingly, the findings of this report may be invalidated wholly or partially by changes outside our-~ontrol. ·Therefo.te, this repqrt is 'Subject_ to revi~w an.d should. be updat~d aft~r a l• ~ . . . . . ·. . .J . ' . ... . :-. .. . . ·. ~ ·. ··.' . .. 'pe~od of .three ye~s~ J ';;· .. I.~~-~:;~~--\: ,' l 1 1 I I j ~' J 1 1 I 1 l J Geotechnical Evaluation and Recommendations Proposed Commercial Development Lot 44, Airport Business Centre, Unit 2, March 22, 1995 16.1 Uniformity of Conditions Page 21 CTE Job No. 101117 The recommendations and opinions expressed in this report reflect our best estimate of the project requirements based on an evaluation of the subsurface soil conditions encountered at the subsurface exploration locations and the assumption that the soil conditions do not deviate appreciably from those encountered. It sh9uld be recognized that the performance of the foundations and/or cut and fill slopes may be influenced by undisclosed or unforeseen variations ill the soil conditions that may occur in the intermediate and unexplored areas. Any unusual conditions not covered in this report that may be encountered during site development should be brought to the attention of the soils engineer so that he may make ' . ,_.,;,_, . modifications if necessary. The opportunity to b~ of service is appreciated. If you have any questions regarding testing conducted, observations made during construction or recommendations presented herein, please do not hesitate to contact this office. ,' l. / l J :1 ] ] ] ") I J 1 _J J ] J _} J :J _: J J ' - . . Geotecbnical Evaluation and Recommendations Proposed Commercial Development Lot 44, Airport Business Centre, Up.it 2 March 22, 1995 Respectfully submitted, CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. ~o~ Rodney D. Ballard, GE #2173 Geotecbnical Engineering Manag 001~ a F. Lynch, CEG #1890 Senior Engineering Geologist Page 22 CTE Job No. 101117 -· ) l 1 l ] ] _} J ] ] .J _j j ] ] ! ~ CoNSTRUCTION TESTING & · ENGINEERING, INC. ----.... _;,, ----~--- 2 1.-.-si . "" -~ )_Cf, SOURCE: THOMAS BROS. MAPS 1994 SAN DIEGO EDITION , I / .,/' , '-.. ,J-. --.......... .,,, ' .; PALI '\ I '-· SITE LOCATION MAP PROPOSED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT LOT 44, AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA JOB NUMBER: 10-1117 DATE: 3/95 FIGURE: 1 r· t ,[ r [ l r [ f r f2 [ [ l t [ I ..... r !,, . ·7-~~;:. 'i 1~::i ·. _, ~ I ~ I 2 1 < I w ::::> z w ~ (!) (!) 0 ...J ...J w ~ NOTTO SCALE ' \ \ \ ' \ \ \ \ PROPOSED PARKING/DRIVE .,, 'PROPOSED BUILDING ~-3 TRASH ENCLOSURE /.,,,. .,,,./ .,,,. .,,,. \ \ FILL \ CUT \ \ \. B-1 . \ -$-\. .\ \ \ · Oat ' l CoNSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEEJUNG, CANVAS: C:/AGURES/10-1117/SITEPI.AN.CVS Tse \ \ \ INC. .,,,. /.,,,. -? • ~ ~ -' .!~~;'.~·_;,_ -.,.-.. '• -.. _. --::-~ . ...::_,-__ -·---. -~~ .:·_ :. -~_::{ __ ~ j•,' • r . ,, I ' -$- - . -j /' Qaf; ' l Tsej l I I LEGEND APPROXIMATE BORING LOCATION PROPERTY LINE CUT/FILL TRANSITION QUARTERNARYARTIFICIAL FILL TERTIARY SCRIPPS FORMATION BORING LOCATION AND SITE PLAN ·PROPOSED COMMERCIAL BUILDING ··LOT 44, AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA { . JOB NUMBER: 10-11171 DATE: 3/95 I FIGURE: 2 I. 'I I i 1 ] ] :1 l 1 j J 1 J 1 l J : (Job No. 101117) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. APPENDIX A REFERENCES Bowles, J.E., 1982, "Foundation Analysis and Design," McGraw Hill. California Division of Mines and Geology, 1975. "Character and Recency of Faulting, San Diego Metropolitan Area, California", Special Report 123 California Division of Mines and Geology, 1992-Revised. "Fault-Rupture Hazard Zones in California," Special Publication 42. Coduto, D.P., 1994, "Foundation Pesign", Prentice Hall. Construction Testing & Engineering, Inc., March 9, 1995, "Geotechnical Evaluation and Recommendations Proposed Commercial Development, Lot 38, Airport Business Centre, Unit 2, Carlsbad, California. Construction Testing & Engineering, Inc., October 13, 1994, "Geotechnical ;evaluation and Recommendations Proposed Commercial Development, Lot 45, Airport Business Centre, Unit 2, Carlsbad, California. Das, B.M., 1983, ""Advanced Soil Mechanics", Hemisphere Publishing Corporation. Department of the Navy, 1982, "Soil Mechanics Design Manual", Naval Facilities Engineering Command. Gastil, G. Higley, R., 1977. "Guide to San Diego Area Stratigraphy, "The Edwin C. Allison Center, San Diego State University. Greensfelder, R.W., 1974. "Maximum Credible Rock Acceleration from Earthquakes in California, "Map Sheet 23. Hart, E.W., 1992, "Fault-Rupture Hazard Zones in California", California Department of Conservation. Holtz, R.D., 1981, "An Introduction to Geotechnical Engineering", Prentice Hall. l I" I 1 ] l 1 ]. 1 J _j ] J l l _, l . .J J J j 1 References• Page Two 13. · 14. 15. 16. ICG, Inc., April 21, 1993, ''Geotechnical Report of Rough Grading, Airport Building Center, Unit 2, Carlsbad, California." Kennedy, M.P., 1975. "Geology of the San Diego Metropolitan Area, California, "California Division of Mines and Geology, Bulletin 200. Peck, R.B., 1974, "Foundation Engineering", John Wiley & Sons, Inc. San Diego Association of Geologists on the Manner of Deposition of Eocene Strata in Northern San Diego County, April 13, 1985. ''. :·,· ' . ' '' ·~ l l r 1 ] ·1 J ] l l ,..,; l t __ J j 1 1 J -,l ' __ , J 1 J l J APPENDIXB FIELD INVESTIGATION -· 1. [ J J ] J I J _, J l l J J J J J ··. J :'. ~:;>--' -,,· ~coNSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. DEFINITION OF TERMS PRIMARY DMSIONS SECONDARY DIVISIONS GRAVELS CLEAN ~~!UJ MORE THAN GRAVELS WELL GRADED GRAVELS, GRAVEL-SAND MIXTURES, LITTLE OR NO FINES POORLY GRADED GRAVELS OR GRAVEL SAND MIXTURES, LITTLE OR NO FINES HALF OF <5%FINES "'u.. 0:: ~-COARSE fil_,WU> :e<!>w FRACTION IS GRAVELS SIL TY GRAVELS, GRAVEL-SAND-SILT MIXTURES, NON- PLASTIC FINES I o:: Gi LARGER THAN i:S-NO.4SIEVE WITH FINES CLAYEY GRAVELS, GRAVEL-SAND-CLAY MIXTURES, PLASTIC FINES ·o:: Cl) SANDS C, !:2 0 CLEAN 0 MORE THAN Ww-'N SANDS "' 0:: :g; • g~ffi~ HALF OF <5%FINES POORLY GRADED SANDS OR GRAVELLY SANDS, LITTLE OR NO FINES COARSE u i FRACTION IS SANDS SIL TY SANDS, SAND-SILT MIXTURES, NON PLASTIC FINES SMALLER THAN WITH FINES NO.4SIEVE CLAYEY SANDS, SAND-CLAY MIXTURES, PLASTIC FINES UJ 0u..ffi~ ..IO ...I «l Ou..-;£. w U) cl. :i £ii· QJ:Cl)- SILTS AND CLAYS LIQUID LIMIT IS LESSTHANS0 11_:~ ~ ._ o SILTS AND CLAYS w ~ ffi Z LIQUID LIMIT IS ~ i ~ I GREATER THAN 50 HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS. INORGANIC SIL TS, VERY FINE SANDS, ROCK FLOUR, SIL TY OR CLAYEY FINE SANDS SLIGHTLY PLASTIC CLAYEY SILTS INORGANIC CLAYS OF LOW TO MEDIUM PLASTICITY, GRAVELLY SANDY SILTY OR LEAN CLAYS I ORGANIC SIL TS AND ORGANIC CLAYS OF LOW PLASTICITY INORGANIC SILTS, MICACEOUS OR DIATOMACEOUS FINE SANDY OR SI TY SOI S STI SI TS INORGANIC CLAYS OF HIGH PLASTICITY, FAT CLAYS ORGANIC CLAYS OF MEDIUM TO HIGH PLASTICITY, ORGANIC SILTY CLAYS PEAT AND OTHER HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS 1----------------~-... -.. GRAIN SIZES 4 10 · 40 200 U.S. STANDARD SIEVE SIZE ADDITIONAL TESTS (OTHER THAN BORING LOG COLUMN HEADINGS) MAX-Maximum Dry Density GS-Grain Size Distribution SE-Sand Equivalent El-Expansion Index CHM-Sulfate and Chloride Content, pH, Resistivity : PM-Permeability SG-Specific Gravity HA-Hydrometer Analysis AL-Atterberg Limits RV-R-Value .. . -· CN-C9n~olidation · ... '~ ' ·~ · .. PP-Pocket Penetrometer WA-Wash Analysis OS-Direct Shear UC-Unconfined Compression MD-Moisture/Density · FIGURE: BL1 l l J l J l l J _J 1 ] l l J 1 J J v ~ CLIENT/PROJECT: CTE JOB NUMBER: LOGGED BY: DRILLER: .. 0. QI G:' <P' ; ~ 8 (.) QI VJ I-e:.. QI b La. ~ -~ .J: • .... -C C 0. Ill QI 41 = .:ii= iii 0 Q :::,, -i?-CD. Q 0 -o ..,.. ~~. -.... - -:X .J -'-- :-5- _., ----- --... ----...... \ --... -10-..._ I .J -.., ..... -.... - ---\ _., ...... --..._ -15- -·- -- ..,,. --.,.. -- -- .. . -20- CONSTRUCTION TESTING AND ENGl~EERING, INC. TEST BORING RECORD SHEET: of .. DRILLING DATE: ELEVATION: DRILLING METHOD: .8 BORING LEGEND ~ ~ -E 1i I > C • co 0 0 .... :, :E ·-. .. co ~., . . .!! Q. 'tJ I- 0 (.) !! ~ :i 0 DESCRIPTION VJ :::> Block or Chunk Sample Bulk Sample Thin Walled Army Corp. of Engineers Sampler " s Standard Penetration Test Modified Split-Barrel Drive Sampler (Cal Sampler) .. Hand Driven Thin Walled Sampler __t_ _., Groundwater Table ' - ..._ --~ ---------------- ... Formation Change (Approximate boundary between soil "types) I • I !FIGURE: BL2 I J_ ~· l ] 1 l I I l J _J J_· .,,;,: .. I ] 1 j .I ·1 .J J :J ·.] ·: J 'i CONSTRUCTION TESTING AND ENGINEERING, INC. PROJECT: DOMINIE PRESS JOB NUMBER: 10-1117 LOGGED BY: VINCE PATULA DRILLER: CTE, INC . .JI Q.. cil 4=I' i ~ 8 cu cu C/J I- lo LI. -. -;:; C l Q. = Ill QI .2 CD Q ::, -CD Q Ci:' .8 (;) ~ e:. -E ~ !! >-c.o ::, • .... c.o C • 41 0 t.) Q ~ :E C/J 0 :::, -o -~ - SC- 25.4 SM -- -..,. -- -5- -.... -- .. . --· -- -10- -e - -- -- -<:·> -15-: -- -- -- . -- -20- .. -·~ ~: J . 2 ~ Q. !! 0 \ TEST BORING RECORD SHEET: 1 of 1 DRILLING DATE: FEBRUARY 27, 1995 ELEVATION: EXISTING GRADE DRILL METHOD: GENERAL 440 with 411 cont. flight, solid-stem auger BORING: B1 li C • .. 0 .... ·-. ~ ti ,::s I- DESCRIPTION ~ FILL Light pale brown, very fine to medium SIL TY/ CLAYEY SAND, moist, loose GS, OS MOISTURE Becomes medium dense @3.0feet Grades to predominantly dark greyish blue, very fine to medium, SIL TY/CLAYEY SAND, moist, medium dense . · Total depth 3.5 feet Borehole backfilled 2/27 /95 No groundwater encountered 2/27 /95 Extreme resistance to continued drilling due to apparent. Scripps Formation contact ·,,._.f·· !FIGURE: B1 _, .. I..---. ____ , -----------coNsTRuCTIONTESTING AND ENGINEERING, INC. ] TEST BORING RECORD l PROJECT: DOMINIE PRESS DRILLING DATE: FEBRUARY 27, 1995 SHEET: 1 of 1 JOB NUMBER: 10-1117 ELEVATION: EXISTING GRADE J . LOGGED BY: VINCE PATULA DRILL METHOD: GENERAL 440 with 4" cont. DRILLER: CTE, INC. flight, solid-stem auoer :} j 1 l j _J ] ] j j .1 j J <P' QI QI l=. J: -a. QI Q --o -- .... - -- -- -5-- -- -- - -- -10- -- -- -- -- -15- -- -- -- -- -20- .m 0. QI ~ ~ (D I-8 I.I.. - ·C = QI -~ ::, a co ! co ts. 1-- )'. ~ G:' .8 (.) ~ e:. t., E ! >-~ CD :::, • -(,() C .!! QI 0 (.) Q 2';-:E (,() Q :::;> SC- SM 87.2 24.4 18.3 · 21.1 ~ .2 J: ·a. !! <!) BORING: B2 DESCRIPTION FILL Light brown, very fine to medium SIL TY/CLAYEY SAND with gravel-size fragments of moderately indurated clayey sandstone/siltstone, moist, loose Becomes medium dense @3.0 feet Grades to predominantly dark greyish blue, very fine to medium, SIL TY/CLAYEY SAND, moist, medium dense Total depth 8.0 feet Borehole backfilled 2/27 /95 No groundwater encountered 2127195 iv C • o-·-. ~ t, "O t-~ MD, DS MOISTURE MOISTURE _, !FIGURE: B2 f ' ( l l \ -CONSTRUCTION TESTING AND ENGINEERING, INC. TEST BORING RECORD · SHEET: 1 of1 PROJECT: DOMINIE PRESS JOB NUMBER: 10-1117 lOGGJ;:D BY: VINCE PATULA DRILLER: CTE, INC. DRILLING DATE: FEBRUARY 27, 1995 ELEVATION: EXISTING GRADE DRILL METHOD: GENERAL 440 with 4" cont. flight, solid-stem auger BORING: B3 DESCRIPTION ii C • 0 .... ·-. :t:! GJ ,:s t-~ -o--+--+-+--+---1-__...,--+--i-------------------------+------1 \ JS SC-FILL -... 105 20-9 CL Light brown, very fine to medium SIL TY/CLAYEY GS, AL, MD, El I. _ _ 1 _ . SAND with gravel-size fragments of moderately indurated .clayey sandstone/siltstone, moist, soft l --b Becomes medium dense l6 21 · 1 SC-At 3.0 feet SM Grades to predominantly dark grey, very -- l _l -5-. s l I ] l J J 1 -- -- -10- -- -- -- -- -15- -- -- -.:. l -- -20-:·· J ' ' . " :~~ ·..1 • -: '. ,. ' .,,· • , • • . 105 16.7 fine to medium, SIL TY/CLAYEY SAND, moist, medium dense Total depth 8.0 feet Borehole backfilled 2/27 /95 No groundwater encountered 2/27 /95 jFIGURE: B3 1 ' ' 1 J l 1 l l J _j ] l ] l J J 1 .] J .:.:. ·:. ,._. . . . . APPENDIXC LABORATORY RESULTS ,' .. . . I ....__. ~ ' .............. L...,__ '----'-' lw.-..:..i ~ ~-~ It--, :..-~ .___J: ~ ~ ____,, -,.~~.------- · CoNSTRUm'ION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INc. •. U. S. STANDARD SIEVE SIZE • • • s 8 .": .:!: t:!E '° o o 8 ~ . • ('I --..,, ... <"> ...,. 00 ... <"> V) ... ('I : . ·1·00 ~ -·-·~ . ·--·-~ ~ -• • .., ,.-... m ~ r,. r-" ,,... ,,..,. ,.,.... ·.: ---.... "'i-. . . ' ' ' .oo ~ ~\ -80 \. '\ M \ " . ., .. ' "' i . " . ~ . . . " ~ . . ~ .. so ~-c::il: • . i:.:i ·' ~ ~++-t-t-+-+-+--+--+---t--;-t-+-+-+--+--+----t-~--H--+-t--!-t-t-1--t---t-+-t-t-i-t--t--+---t---+-f-+-l-+--+-t-,-+--+--- . . . 30 ++-t-1-+-+-+--+--+----+++-t-+--!-+--+---+---t-++-+-+--,---+--+----IH-+-i--t-+--+--+--1---1-1-+-+--l--l-+---+----I : ·.. 20 -..... . . . 10 ++-+-+-+-+-+--+--+----+++-+-+--+-+--+---+---++-l-l--l-f---l.--l--+---H-+-l-l-l--+--l--1---+-<~-l--l--l-+------1----1 0 -t-'-._._ ........ __..___.__......__--t-............... _._..__....._ ___ -t-....................... ____. _ _,___---l~ ........ --_.._---------+-' .............. ...__.._......___.__---4 100 10 1 0.1 o.oi 0.001 ' . PARTICLE SIZE (mm) · ·BORING NO. SAMPLE DEPTH (ft) SYMBOL LIQUID LIMIT(%) PLASTICITY INDEX CLASSIFICATION · · B3 0-3 • 46.3 20 SC-CL ' ', . ' --. --- .. 10-1117 PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS FIGURE: Cl J. .. ...__. .......L..., -L_ ~ ~ I .__.___., "-----' ,.~ -.......... t...---.. .,.' ~ ~ _ ____; . ..........., CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING~ INC. U. S. STANDARD SIEVE SIZE . ~ . . 8 8 • "l M 00 0 0 . --..... -0 M _. ....... ... .... ..,. 00 -.... VI ... M 100 . ~ ::: ~---« .... ... ---w ... -.. . --~ r' - ', 90 ,- '"~ 80 -~ 'i\ 70 ' ' :\ t.!, 60 z ~ ~ 1',., 50 -E "' I' I\ ·?i . ". •If: 40 30. 20 - I 10 0 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 PARTICLE SIZE (mm) BORING NO. SAMPLE DEPTH JftJ SYMBOL LIQUID LIMIT(%) PLASTICITY INDEX CLASSIFICATION B2 1.0-1.5 • --SC-SM --• ---10-1117 PARTICLE SIZE ~AL YSIS FIGURE: C2 ··-~ ~-............. l.--,.____, ~ ----I -~ --'---- : CoNsmucr1oriTEsTING & ENGINEERING, INc. •: U. S. Sf ANDARJ> SIEVE SIZE • • • s. l 8 • "'l • ~ ~ ~ \0 ·O O 8 N .-.-('f') ...-('f") V 00 ..,.. Cf) It') _.. C"i 100 • ---~ ----... . • r" ' ---~ ,; ...... .. I -.... I "I'\ • 90. . . ~~ w ' \ .. I\ 70 ++-+-+-+-+-+--+-+-----+++-+-+-+--h--t----+---++++-+--,f--+~--t--'--l-l-+--1---4-1--i---+--1-----HH-1-l-+-1--+---+----I ' . - ~-· 60 \ , i· ·, \ < . [\ .i so. \ . ~ ~ ~ ·40° ++-1-+-+-+-+--+-+-----+-H--t-t--+--t--t---+---++++-t-1--+---+--+------'11.+-t-~-+--t--t---11----H--1-1--+-+---,1--1---1---t ' .. ' ,_ ~0-t--t-H--t-t--t----t----t------t-i-t--i-t--t--t--t----t---rr""H--t-il--t---t--t----iH-t--t-t-,--t--t----,r----Hr-t-t-t-+--11--t----t-----t 20++-+-+--t-+-+--+--+----++++-+--+--+--t----+---H--++-t-f--+---+--+---H-t--l---4-1--1--l--l-----1--1H-l-l-+-il--+--+----I .. . ·10·+ +-' +-+-+-+-+--+--+----+-+++-+-t---t--+---t---++-++-+-t--t--t--+---H-t--+-l-+--+--+--t----+-H-1-t--l-l--+---+---t 0 ........................ _______ ---t __ ....._ _______ _,.... ______________ ..,........_......,_.___._ ___ -+-.......,. __ ...._..._...._ ....... _-,f · 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 PARTICLE SIZE (mm) · BORING NO. SAMPLE DEPTH (ft) SYMBOL LIQUID LIMIT ( % ) PLASTICITY INDEX CLASSIFICATION Bl 0.5-1.0 • -~ -SC-SM --. --- 10-1117 PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS FIGURE: C3 j 1 l ·1 I l J l 1 1 ] l ! . j 1 ] J i ..-,t• II CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. II 6000 5000 4000 u: ti) e:. :c I-C, z w a: 3000 tii C, z a: ~ :c ....,........ ti) -. . 2000 ,. / ~ ~ 1000 ~ 0 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 NORMAL LOAD (PSF) Boring No. I Depth (ft) Coh~sion Angle of Friction Sample Description 82 I 12":-18" 700 21 S1.LTY/CLAYEY SAND* * remolded to field density II JOB NO. 10-1117 II SHEARING STRENGTH TEST · II FIGURE: C4 11 J ' r: .,. ] j ] J l l j _j ] 1 I _} l j 1 . ] .- J c~NSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, 60 ><50 w C z -40 ~ (.) i= 30 Cl) :5 ii. 20 10 PLASTICITY CHART / CH _,,v V ---------1 " OH and MH-- // CL t--=":-:=---'71'"/ CL-ML I/ ML O O 10 20 ·30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 LIQUID LIMIT SAMPLE BORING DEPTH NAT. LL PL Pl NO. NO. FT. W.C.,% 1 83 0-3' ---46.3 25.9 20 .. ., . . . . . . . . . INC. SYMBOL SC-CL . . . .... . . FIGURE: · . C5 1 l .J J J I j J _J ~ J l l l I J J 1 ] ] ~ MOISTURE AND DENSITY TEST LOCATION DEPTH Wl;:T DENSITY DRY DENSITY MOISTURE (FT) (PSF) (PSF) (%) 82 1.0-1.5 108.5 87.2 24.4 83 0.5-1.0 126.6 104.7 20.9 -· _.. 83 5.0-6.0 122.3 104.8 16.7 MOISTURE 81 0.5-0.9 ------25.4 82 3.0-5.5 ---..... ----18.3 ~- 82 5.5-6.0 ----21.1 83 3.0-3.5 -----21.1 ~XPANSION POTENTIAL (U.B.C. 29-2) LOCATION DEPTH EXPANSION EXPANSION POTENTIAL (FT) INDEX 83 0-3.0 24 LOW r JOB NUMBER: 10-1117 FIGURE: C6 I l ] 1 l l ] _j ' ] ] J l J J -1 J J • ICG 2992 La Palma, Suite-A Anaheim, CA 92806 714/632-2980 fax: 714/632-9209 .. incorporc,tecl Olher Olfices in Irvine, San Diego, San Bernardino, and Palm Desert. April 21, 1993 Sumitomo Bank of California South San Pedro street, suite 500 Los Angeles, California 90012 Job No. 05-906~-001-00-01 Log No. 3-1063 Attention: Mr. Richard Y. -Hirota SUBJECT: GEOTECBNICAL REPORT OP ROUGH GRADING Airport Business Centre, Unit 2 Carlsbad, California Gentlemen: 1.0 INTRODUCTION a. b. c. This report summarizes the results of our geotechnical testing and obse:r;vation services performed .between August 24, 1989 and April 2, 1990 for the rough grading of Airport Business Center, Unit 2, Carlsbad; California. The grading contractor for the project was Astlef ord ConstructiQn, Inc. of ·san Marcos, Cal~fornia. civil engineering and field grade staking was provided by Bodas Engineering of Carlsbad, California. The SO-scale grading plans were prepared by Bodas Engineering. Sheets 3, 4 and 5 of 6 were utilized as the base map for our Geotechnicai Maps, Plates 1 through 3. The accompanying As-Graded Geotechnical Maps (Plates 1 through 3) show the as-built geotechnical conditions at the site and the approxj.mate locations of the field 1 , l ' t J 1 ] l ] .:., ] 1 J I _ _j j 1 ] ] ., _. ~ . APPENDIXD REFERENCE REPORT ......... _ .. ,' I .: 1 l. ] ·1 ] ] l j _J ] ] ] l ' ] . : . ' - J '> _. _. ~ .. .- GEOTECHNICAL.REPORT 0~ ROUGH GRADING Airport Business Centre, Unit 2 Carlsbad, California Prepare~ For: Sumitomo Bank of California South Sari Pedro street, Suite 500 Los Angeles, California. ~0012 Prepareq By; ICG Incorporated 2~92 La Palma, suite A Anaheim, California 92806 Job No. os~906s-001-oo-01 Log No. 3.,...1063 .April. 21, 1993 ·-·-.. .. ] ~ l J ] l ~l _j 1 ] j l ] J Sumitomo Bank of California April 21, 1993 Job No. 05-9065-001-00-01 Log No. 3-l.063 Page 2 d. 1.1 1. 2 density tests. The field density test results are provided in Table 2. A summary of the as-graded conditions, the grading operations, and the testing performed are presented below. Based on our geotechnical evaluation of the as- graded conditions at the site, we-have presented preliminary recommendations for future development of the site. Authorization Preparation of .this ·' report has been accomplished approximately 3 years after completion of the grading operations for the new owner of the property, Sumitomo Bank of California. The work was authorized by our contract (P-SD-3-6200) dated February 26,_ l.993. Scope of Services our geotechnical services for this proj!ect involved the following: ..... _ a. Site reconnaissance to evaluate existing site conditions .. b. Compilation of field and laboratory test data. c. Preparation of As-Graded Geotechnical Maps. d. Preparation of the As-Graded Geotechnical Report. ,' I i' l J 1 l J J l J < Sumitomo Bank of California April 21, 1993 2.0 SITE LOCATXON/DBSCRXPTXON Job No. 05-9065-001-00-01 Log No. 3-1063 Page 3 a. Unit 2 of the Carlsbad Airport Centre occupies a 70 acre parcel of irregular shape located in Carlsbad, California (See Location Map, Figure 1). The site was graded to . . prepare 2·1 industrial lots, 2 open space lots, and associated streets and other improvements. b. · Prior to grading., the topography was characterized by ridges and associated small drainages which generally flowed south and west. The lower portion of the main drainage course, parallel and adjacent to Palomar Airport ··------_. ________ Road, ·has bee~pre_!>erved as open space. Maximum relief _j for the site is about 240 feet, with elevations ranging from. about 90 to 330 feet above mean sea level . .J ] J ·I J j 1 l. ·;·_. Ji~((•.•· c •. Portions of the site were graded in 1986 in conjunction with grading of unit 1, Palomar Oaks Way and Camino Vida Roble (Reference 17). The locations of fills placed duri11g this gJ:ading are indicated on the Geotechnical Maps, Plates 1 through 3~ d. Gr.ading of the site during this phase of grading ....._ generally consisted o·f cutting along the ridges and filling in the canyon areas to provide roadways and sheet-graded pads for future industrial development. The project also involved remedial grading for: i. slope buttresses and stabilization fills adjacent to lots 31, 32, 341 and 49. , ... .! l l } l J l J _j r I . J l J ] 1 ;:..,~ •,• ·-,,. .. > . _ ..... _; • . .... -- 0 2000 ..C.000 ----FEET JOB NO.: 05-9065-00.1-00-01 ,: ,: _ ....... ! i '-:. : .....,· -'·. ·- •, ·.' ... , ! ... ·--;::: . . . <· -:;; ADAPTED FROM U.S.G.S. 7.5' ENCINITAS (1975) AND SAN LUIS REY (1975) QUADRANGLES LOCATION MAP DATE: FIGURE: APRIL 1993 1 ICG Incorporated .. J ] ] J J J _ _] ] ] 1 . ) i j J _.:.] J . ~ ' .. . Sumitomo Bank of California April_ 21, 1993 ~ob No. 05-9065-001-00-01 Log No. 3-1063 Page 5 ii. removal of compressible alluvium and portions of previously ~laced landfill adjacent to the airport. e. The site is generally in a similar condition to that when grading operations were completed in 1990, except as follows: i. A building and associated improvements have been constructed on·Lot 37. ii. Monitoring wells have been placed on Lots 28, 29, 3·0, 34 and 36 by another geotec;:hnical/environmental firm. These wells were presumably placed· to monitor/collect the presence of gases/leachate from . previous landfill on or adjacent to the site. iii. Partially backfilled backhoe pits are present on Lots 39 and 41. iv. Erosion has damaged the fill slope on the southwest corner of Lot 39 adjacent to Kellog_g Avenue. v. All the lots have a light growth of annual vegetation and minor erosion gul.lies. ·-..,.._ ., . vi. The slopes have been landscaped and are generally performing well.. Wet areas on some of the pads indicate· that watering of the slopes may be excessive. .. i j ' I l J :.j J l I J __ j J ] 1 l I . l i J I _.]· J .. ., ;: Sumitomo Bank of caiifornia April 21, 1993 Job No. 05-9065-001-00-01 Log No. 3-1063 Page 6 3.0 GEOtoGrc SETTING 3.1 Geotechnical Conditions 3.2 a. Geologic conditions prior to grading of the site are described in the referenced reports (References 12, 15, 16 and 17). b. Geotechnical conditions present at the conclusion of grading operations are shown on the Geotechnical Maps, Plates 1 through 3. c. ~ brief description of the soil and bedrock units at the site is presented below. Bedrock Units ..,.·~-·~ . . a. Santiago Peak Volcanics (Map Symbol Jsp) The Jurassic Age Santiago Peak Volcanics Formation was encountered in the northwester~ portion of the site. The·santiago Peak formatio:11 is a series of mildly metamorphosed volcanic rocks. Regionally, the Santiago Peak Volcanics vary._ in composition -·-.. from basalt to rhyolite. On the site they are predominately andesite . The Santiago Peak Formation, as observed during grading, was highly jointed, with variable joint spacing . Clay irt-f illing was usually present in . joints near the surface, _where. ~eathering is more j l J l l ] l l J _j ] ] l J ! _) J ] ·. l :· .. ..... l ... ... Sumitomo Bank of California April 21, 1993 Job No. 05-9065-001-00-01 Log No. 3-1063 Page 7 3.3 b. pronounced. Weathering was found to extend to depths of 12 feet in some areas. Santiago Formation (Map Symbol Tsa) The Eocene Age Santiago Formation underlies most of the site. ;During grading· this formation was observed to consist of interbedded claystones, siltstones, and fine grained sandstones. Soii Units a. Alluvium/Colluvium (Map Symbol Oal) . . Alluvial and colluvial soil on-site consisted of light to dark brown, silty to clayey, fine to medium grained sand with some organics. Alluvium was located in canyons and drainage bottoms, with depths ranging from approximately 1 to 26 feet within ·the graded area. Colluvium, ranging in depth from approximately 2 to 6 feet, mantled the upland areas and slopes. -The alluvium and I colluvium were considered to be unsuitable and were removed to expose dense bedrock materials within '""""'·-. the graded area. 3.4 Fili So.ils a. Fill soils consisted of on-site materials, excavated during grading, which comprised alluvium, . . colluvium and. bedrock. Blasting and heavy ripping .. ?f the ,. sa~~iago_. Peqk Volcanics prod1:1ce·d . a : ... .. .... .l l ,l l I .J __ J J l l _., l J ] .. 1-.· . 1 ... ... Sumitomo Bank of California April 21, 1993 Job No. 05-9065-001-00-01 Log No. 3-1063 Page 8 b. .. significant quantity of rock which was placed as a rock fill in the canyon area below Lots 39, 40, 44 45 and 46, as well as below Kellogg Avenue. Oversize rock material was placed in a non- structural fi~l area nqrth of Lots 39, 40 and 41. The soil fills generally consisted of silty sands, silty clays, and sandy clays. Fills up to approximately 50 feet in thickness were placed during grading operations concluded in 1986 (Reference 17). The location of these fills are indicated on the Geotechnical Maps, Plates 1 through 3. ~hese fills are similar to the soil fills placed_ during this grading operation.- 3.5 Geologic Structure a. b. c. The geologic structure encountered during grading· operations was generally as anticipated in the referenced . r~ports and can be characterized as gently tilted Eocene sedimentary rock nonconformably overlying Jurassic.metavolcanics. ' Bedding attitudes taken throughout the site suggest . ........ _. a 3 to 9 ~egree, west to southwest regional dip, although steeper bedding was encountered in localized areas. No evidence of faulting was observed by our field geologic mapping during grading. .I I . l l l J ) l l J _J I J J J ] . •. -~ . ... . . . ] ',' , + :,. .. .. Sumitomo Bank of California April 21, 1993 Job No. 05-9065-001-00-01 Log No. 3-1063 Page 9 4.0 ~-;...· 3.6 surface and subsurface water a. Prior to ·grading, the major drainage adjacent to Palomar Airport Road contained a small stream, apparently ted by ·.seepage from nearby develop~ents. A subdrain installed during grading below Lot 29 was designed to intercept this seepage. The subdrain discharges into·the natural area below the toe of the newly constructed fill slope_on Lot 26. No other seepage was observed during grading. b. surface drainage within the graded site is designed to flow into desil ting basins and storm draix:is. Brow ditches direct surface water on perimeter slopes to the storm drain system or dissipaters at the toe of slopes. GRADING OPERATIONS 4.1 General a. The site grading is shown on the so-scale plans d·eveloped by Bodas Engineering Incorporated. Copies of these plans serve as a ·base map for our As-Graded Geotechnical Maps, (Plates 1 through 3). b. Site grading was performed using conventional cut/fill mass g~ading techniqqes with heavy earth- moving equipment. The grading operation began with alluvium and colluvium removals in canyon areas. Once }tlluvium .. was removed, subdrains . were . . . ...... . < • · . ]. l j l J l 1 ) l J ] J .J . 1 . ]· . ~.. : .. , .. J Sumitomo Bank of California April 21, 1993 Job No. 05-9065-001-00-01 Log No. 3-1063 Page 10 c. constructed in canyon or removal bottoms. Bedrock cuts, including removals of surficiai colluvium, were then pe:rformed, with the material generated being placed as compacted fill in the canyons. The mass grading generally progressed from the southeast toward the northwest portion of the site. Drilling and blasting was required in the northeast portion of the site where hard metavolcanic rock was encountered .• 4.2 Preparation of Natural Ground The site was first cleared of subsurface obstructions and strjpped of vegetation. Topsoil, colluvium, alluvium, and existing uncompacted fills were removed to bedrock prior to placing fill. The exposed· subgrade was scarified to a depth of 6 to 8 inches, moisture conditioned, and compacted. 4.3 Soil Types I The representative soil types used as fill material are tabulated in Table 1, "Laboratory Test Results". The maximum density · and optimum moisture of·-the soils was determined by ASTM D1557-78 (Modified Proctor Method). All fill material was derived from on-site or immediately · adjacent sources. The fill generally consists of silty, fine to medium sand (SM), sandy silt (ML), and silt-clay mixtures (CL-CH) . ; .. ·~ . . .. .: .. ~-,, l J :1 J I -I j J _J ] ] 1 I ] J J . ] ' J . , :.!' ... .. • Sumitomo Bank of California April 21, 1993 Job No. 05-9065-001-00-0l Log Ne>. 3-1063 Pa9'e 11 Rock fill, derived from blasted Santiago Peak metavolcanics, consisted of fairly well graded angular shot rock ranging up to occasional 24-inch maximum dimension rocks. The rock fill also contains fine grained sand and clay •. 4.4 Fill Placement and Testing .. - . . a. Fill soils were typically placed in 6 to a-inch lifts, brought to approximate optimum moisture content, and compacted. The compaction equipment consisted of self-propelled rubber-tired compactors, scrapers, sheepsfoot rollers, and other heavy earthmoving equipment. b. Density tests were conducted in accordance with ASTM 02922-86 and ASTM 3017-78 (Nucl"ear Methods). Results of the density tests are tabulated in · Appendix c, "Field Density Test Results". Approximate test locations are shown on the accompanying "As-Graded Geotechnical Maps", Plates 1 through 3·. The test·· elevations and locations were estimated -from field grade stakes and extrapolated from the project plans; further -·-. accuracy is not implied. c. Rock fill generated by·cuts in the area of Lots 37, 38~ and 39 was placed as structural fill under Lots 39, 40, 44, 45, and 4·6. A performance standard for rockfill compaction was established based on a testfill in acoordanGe with the recommendations in . .. .. R~ferences -6 and. 7 . .. . . .. .... r l l 1 1 j I I I J _J l I J J 1 l J Sumitomo Bank of California April 21, 1993 Job No. 05-9065-001-00-01 Log No. 3-1063 Page 12 4.5 cut/Fill Transitions At. the conclusion of mass grading, several of the pad areas had cut/fill tra~sitions (contact between bedrock and .fill) exposed at the surface. These lots include Lot 28, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, ~5, 36, 37, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 4 7, 48 and 49. The· approximate locations of the cut/fill transition i~ indicated on the Geotechnical Maps, Plates 1 through 3. 4.6 Slopes 4.6.1 4.6.2 Fill Slopes Fill slopes were g~nerally constructed at slope ratios of 2:1 (horizontal:vertical) or flatter, to a maximum height of.about 65 feet. Fill keys were excavated at the toe of the , slopes prior to tilling. Fill slopes were built either by overfilling, then cutting back to grade, or by backrolling with a sheepsfoot I roller at intervals as the fill was brought up. Finishing was done by track-walking the -·-slope ·face with a dozer. Cut Slopes Cut slopes were generally graded to a slope ratio of 2: 1 (horizontal: vertical) or flatter, with a maximum height of .about 30 ~eet. Cut ... . . ,' 1 J J j I :I ] __ I ] J J J J .J J 'J' J ·,.;,' ,. ~ ' ~ ,_ . .. Sumitomo Bank of California April 21, 1993 Job No. 05-9065-001-00-01 Log No. 3-1063 Page 13 4.6.3 4.6 .. 4 4.6.5 ,; . . .. . ·, ~ ,; ,: slopes were mapped by the project geologist to document geologic conditions. Buttress Fills The cut slope between Lots 33 and 34 ·was constructed as a buttress fill to stabilize a clay seam found. during grading operations. The buttress was constructed with the recommendations in accordance provided in References 11, 12 and 14. The approximate location of the key and backdrain is indicated on the Geotechnical Maps, Plates 1-3. Stability Fills -. -Slopes designed as cut slopes adjacent to Lots- 31, 32, 34 and 49 were constructed as stabilization fills to replace materials particularly susceptibl.e to erosion and surficic\l instability. The fills were constructed with keys and backdrains in I accordance with the recommendations provided in Ref.erences 11, 12 and 14. . The approximate ·--....._ , locations of the keys and backdrains are indicated on the Geotechnical Maps, Plates 1- 3 • Natural.Slopes Off-site natural ~lopes · where potential ·.·: i~stability could <:}ir~ctly ·. ~~f~~t . the d~sign .• ... J . f· 1 j . .l ] 1 J l _! ] ] ·1 J l l .) J ] ] J )• .. . Sumitomo Bank of California April 21, 1993. . Job No. 05-9065-001-00-0l Log No. 3-1063 Page 14 4.6.6 ·, . ,';., -: ' . slopes and building pads constructed for this development were evaluated prior to the grading. During the grading, our field personnel verified that no adverse geologic conditions were encountered which would require additional remedial measures. Subdrains and Backdrains a. b. Subdrains were placed in the major canyon bottoms after alluvial removals had been completed. The subdrains consisted of perforated PVC pipe surrounded by 3/4" open graded. crushed rock and wrapped in geofabric, consistent with the recommendations in our referenced geotecbJlica1. -reports (References 11, 12 and 14). Approximate subdrain locations are shown on the As-Graded Geotechnical Maps (Plates 1 through 3) • The subdrains are outletted into storm drain systems or discharged to surface grades. Backdrains were installed along the heal ....... _ .. of the keyways for the buttress and stability fills constructed adjacent to Lots 31, 32, 34 and 49. The approximate locations are shown on the Geotechnical Map, Plates.1-3. ., l J l J ~' ] ] 1 l j l .. . ,. , :' Sumitomo Bank of California April 21, 1993 Job No. 05-9065-001-00-0l Log No. 3-1063 Page 15 5.0 GEOTECBNICAL EVALUATXON AND RECOMMENDATXONS 5.1 General a. b. We consider that the grading and earthwork operations carried out under our observation and testing were performed in general.accordance with the intent of the recommendations presented in our referenced geotechnical reports (Appendix A) and with the requirements of the city of Carlsbad. The conclusions and recommendations contained herein are based on our observations and testing services performed from August 24, 1989 through April 2, 1990. Plans for subsequent development of the site should be forwarded to the Geotechnical Consultant for review and comment with regard to specific grading and foundation design criteria as these plans become available. A geotechnical investigation will be required for each lot to develop specific -grading reco:nunendations and foundation criteria for I proposed struGtures. ........ _ ., 5.2 Slope Stability Cut and F·ill Slopes Based on our obs·ervation and testing, cut and fill slopes at the site were constructed in general cqnformance with 9ur recommendations and the ·grading: requirell}~I)t~. of .the City ·of. Carlsba~. · .. .. · . . . . ~ -· . / . I ] ' 1 J l J ] ) J _J J J .1 1 Sumitomo Bank of California April. 21, 1993 Job No. 05-9065-001-00-01 Log No. 3-1063 Page 16 Previous slope stability analyses (see Referenced Reports) indicate that cut and fill slopes within these lots have factors of safety in excess of generally accepted minimum design criteria (Factor- of-Safety = 1.50). Both cut and fill. slopes are respect to expected to perform favorably with surficial stability if drainage devices are maintained and slope maintenance is impl.emented. 5.3 Settlement 5.4 Based on the fill thickness placed during this · and previous grading operations, it is our opinion that development of commercial/industrial structures at the sit~ is feasible, provided that potential fill settlements are evaluated and incorporated in the design of the propose<;! structures. In particular, building locations on Lots 28 throug~ 31, 33, 36, ·and 40 through 46 should be evaluated during the early pl~nning stages due to considerable differential fill thicknesses.. It is recommended that the Project Soils Engineer, Civil Engineer, St.ructural Engineer and Archit~·ct should review and evaluate the location and type of all 1 structures with respect to the potential settlement of the fill materials. ·-·-. Foundation Design Criteria General -Geotechnical considerations that will influence J: .. ~· .... ~· · ._foundation de$ign among 9ther things include: . . . . . . .. '• : . . J -· l< . ' ' . , .. j j 1 ·J ·l I 1 l J _J ] l J J J J .• ;.-. .. .. Sumitomo Bank of California Aprj.l 21, 1993 Job No. 05-9065-001-00-01 Log No. 3-1063 Page 17 a. b. c. The bearing capacity characteristics of the soil and bedrock materials on-site. The expansive nature of the on-site soils. The consolidation characteristics of the underlying soils and bedrock. A site specific geotechnical investigation is recommended for all future development planned·for the subject mass graded lots. Plans for subsequent development of the subject lots. should be forwarded to the geotechnical consultant for review to evaluate the proposed grading and construction with .. respect to the geotechnical features of the site and to provide recommendations for specific . -....... ~ -· --·-. . . structural foundations and associated improvements. 5.5 Transition Building Pads Where ·building pads are located such that they span across a transition from cut to fill,.remedial grading I and/or appropriate structural design may be required to mitigate the potential adverse effects due to non-uniform ·--.._ . bearing characteristics of the underlying materials. When the fill portion of such pads is shallow, remedial .grading consisting. of··overexcavation of the .cut po:+tion. · of the pad to a minimu~ dep~h of three feet· below f i.nish pad grade and replacem¢nt as compacted fill is generally sufficient to provide unifopn bearing characteristics for mq_st .. structur~s. We recommend that the Soils Engin~er. . eva·1uate ... ·transition · .areas .-ana :. provttie apJ?r9pria~e .. -.J . ·,.. · .. • • .... • • • • • #' • • · .. :· ... ~ . . . ... ' . . ·. .. J -· ] I l ,1 I I ,1 ·I l ) I ] 1- J 1 I ) J, I 1 I .,, Sumitomo Bank of California April 21, 1993 Job No. 05-9065-001-00-01 Log No. 3-1063 Page 1.8 recommendations as plans for future development become available. 5.6 Drainage and Slope Maintenance a. Surface Drainage Pad drainage should be designed to collect and direct surface waters away from proposed structures to approved drainage facilities. For earth areas, a minimum gradient of two perc~nt should be maintained and drainage should be directed toward approved swales or drainage facilities·. Drainage patterns ~pproved at the time of fine grading should be: maintained throughout the life of proposed structures. Even when these measures are taken, a shallow groundwater or surface water condition may devel.op in areas wh~~e no such water condition existed prior to site ~development; this is particularly true where a substantial increase in surface water infiltrati9n results from landscape irrigation. We reco~end that landscape planters either not be located next to buildings and pavement areas, or be prop~rly drained to an -·-. appropriate outlet. Slope drainage devices ·have been constructed in accordance w.i tll applicable standards. maintenance is necessary to allow performance of these devices. on-going pr<?per _, I ~ -~-.. J 1 1 l I J l -. --}---- _, l ] ] I ! J ·1 J J ] :_ i. ]" . . . . I . . ' J 1-·o ·, Sumitomo Bank of California April 21, 1993 Job No. 05-9065-001-00-0l Log No. 3-1063 Page 19 .. . . ., . ·. b. Subsurface Drainage c. Subsurface drainage devices, including canyon subdrains and drains in stabilization and buttress keys were installed in accordance with our recommendations.. The locations and types of drains installed are presented on the Geotechnical Maps, Plates·l through 3. All drain outlets should be maintained to prevent burial or blockage. Maintenance of Slopes and Drainage Devices _,. ... --Ma:intenaiice· --oi ·---·s1opes -ana-·-drainage devices is important · .. to their long-term performance. The following is a list of suggested procedures provided as a guide for slope maintenance. i. Drainage Devices • Graded berms, swales, area drains, and slopes are designed to carry surface water from pad areas and should not be. blocked or destroyed.·, Water should not be allowed to pond in pad areas, or overtop and flow down graded or natural _ slopes. . ...... _ . • -sources of uncontrolled water, such as leaky water pipes or drains, sho~ld be repaired·· __ if identified. . . ~- • Devices constructed to drain and protect . slopes, including brow ditches, berms, terrace drains and down drains should·be maintained regularly, and in particular, should not be ~llowed to clqg such that .. · ¥atef-. c.an flo~ · unchecke.d over s;I.ope .... • . ·. ·. 'J:a.ces.. .< . :. • • .. :·. ,· : :: ·: •. .. .. . . .. .. .· . . ., . . ... ,: I . ' , ,.~. . ' . I :. ~ ' ;, ... ... Sumitomo Bank of California April 21, 1993 Job No. 05-9065-001-00-01 Log No. 3-1063 Page 20 5.7 • Subdrain outlets should be maintained to prevent burial or other blockage. ii. Slopes • Slopes in the southern California area should be planted with appropriate drought-resistant -vegetation as recommended by a landscape architect. • Slopes should not be overirrigated. Heavy ground cover combined with overwatering i$ a primary source of surficial slope failures. • Animal burrows can serve to collect normal sheet flow on slopes and cause rapid and destructive erosion, and should be controlled or eliminated. • · Modification to slopes, including all placement of fill materials or . excavations that steepen or otherwise modify designed slope angles should. not be attempted without direction or approval of the Soils Engineer. Subsequent Grading Operations Prior to the commencement of· additional grading operations on-site, inciuding pi-ecise grading ·and backfilling of trenches and retaining walls, the Soils Enginee~ should be notified to provide appropriate recommendations and observation and testing services as required. . . . . .. . . . . . ... ·· ... ,• l~ ~. ,. 1 ~ ·' J j ) ] l l J _J J . ]~-· ·) J . I I l ' .. l _j ·1 ·.· J. .. . J J ., ' -- Sumitomo Bank of California April 21, 1993 Job No. 05-9065-001-00-0l Log No. 3-1063 Page 21 5.8 Plan Review As foundation and grading plans are completed, they should be forwarded to the Geotechnical Consultant for review for conformance with the recommendations herein or to provid~ additional recommendations as necessary. 9:o LIMITATIONS OF INVESTXGATrON a. our investigation was performed in accordance with the usual and current standards of the profession, as they b. c. ' relate to this and similar localities. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is provided as to·the conclusions and professional advice presented in this report. i. The samples taken and tested, and the observations performed are considered to be representative of the subject site; however, soil and geologic conditions can vary significantly between sample locations • ii. The test location elevations shOlllll. in Table 2 are based on surveys done by others. .. Any changed conditions. revealed during. construction. should·be'brought to our attention immediately for our evaluation. d. ·. Thi~ r¢po~ is issued with th~ ~nderstanding that it is .. the···.· ~~~pon~ib1lity. · ,t;,'f ·:. the Owne~, .. or . of ·_._:hj.s. . .. . . . . -. .. " . : .. . .. . . •,;.:.-.•'' _, 1 ,: ' '")_.. ---: .• l J 1 1 l. l J _J 1 l l l .J J J. J Sumitomo Bank of California April 21,· 1993 Job No. 05-9065-001-00-01 Log No. 3-1063 Page 22 e. f. representative, to ensure that the information and reconunendati.ons contained herein are brought to the attention of the Architect and Engineer for the project and incorporated into the plans, and that the Contractor and Subcontractors implement such recommendations in the field. our grading·observations and test results presented in this report are. limi~ed to those grading operations performed between August 1989 and April 1990. The findings of this report are considered valid as of the· later date. However, changes in the conditions of a site can occur with the passage of time, whether they be due to natural events or to human activities on this or adjacent sites. In addition, changes in applicable or appropriate codes and standards may occur, whether they result from legislation or-the broadenin~ of knowledge. Accordingly, the findings of this report may be invalid wholly or partially by changes outside our control. Therefore, this report is subject to review and revision as changed conditions a~e identified., g. This report is subject to review by the local regulating agency. . ' .. . . ... . . . . ·. ..· ... .· . r .. --.. ~ r 1 l l I l l J J ) I rj ) 1 · .t. r J I sum;i.tomo aank of California April 21., l.993- ~ob No. 05-9065-001-00-0l. Log No. 3-l.063 Page 23 The opportunity to be of service is appreciated. If there are any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, ICG Incorporated PAT/HW/TGH/lh Dist~ibution: ~ttachments: .. ,,. . , ... 1. 2. 3. 4. Addressee Appendix A Table 1 Table 2 Plates 1-3 ... . . . Thomas G. Hill, Registration Ex.pi yice President,1=.£~ie References Laboratory compaction Test Results . field Density Test Results -As-Graded Geotechnical Maps/Test Location Plans ... . . . ' ... . . .. •' . ,f; "'· -~ :·. ... 1 r J I j J _j J J j I Job No. 05-9065-001-00-01 Log No. 3-1063 Page A-1 1. APPENDIX A References ICG Incorporated, August 3, 1990, Discontinuance of Geotechnical services, Carlsbad Airport Centre, Unit 2, Carlsbad, California, Job No. 05-4879-.016-0l-(10,30,40), Log No. 0-2203. 2. ICG Incorporated, April 25, 1990, Letter Regarding· Well Abandonment, Palomar A~rport Centre, 1921 Palomar Oaks Way, Carlsbad, Califo.rnia, Job No. 05-4879-016-oo-oo, Log No. 0-1535. 3. · ICG Incorporated, December 4, 1989, Revised Recommendations for Soil Cap on Soil/Rockfill, Carlsbad Airport Centre, U:nit 2, Carlsbad, California, Job No. 05-4879-016..-01-10, -Log No. 9-2454. · . 4 •. ICG Inc~rporated, November 17, 1989, Soil corrosivity-Tests for Hilfiker Wall, Palomar Airport Centre,, Unit·· 2, Carlsbad, California, Job No. 05-4879-016-oo-~o, Log No. 9-2403. 5. 6. ICG !ncorporated., November · 15, 1989, . Geot:echnical Recommendations for Retaining· Wall, · Palomar · Airport Centre, Unit 2, Carlsbad, California, Job No. 05-4879- 016-0l-10, Log No. 9~2394. ICG Incorporated, November. 9, 1989, Rock Testfill·,· Carlsbad Airport Centre, Unit 2, carlsba~, California, Job-No. os- 4879-016-01-10, Log_ No. 9-23~3 '! . • .1 7. IC.G Incorporated, October 27, ·19s9, Compaction Testing in Rockfill, Carlsbad Airport Centre, Unit 2, Carlsbad, California, Job No. 05-4879-016-0l-10,· Log No. 9-2310. J I 8. ) 9. f. _·. L . 1 ... . -~ .. . ·i . · ..•. \ . _,,. J • >, • ' '·,\~. :.·."' " ICG Inc9rporated, October 26, 1989, 9oil CoJ;rosivity Tests for Hilfiker Wall, Palomar Airport Centre., U.nit 2, ·carlsbad, California, Job No. ·05-4879-016-00-10. San . . Diego Geotechnical Consultants, September 27, 1989, Recommendations· for Placing oversize Rock in Off site Fill, Carlsbad Airport Centre, . Unit . 2, Carlsbad, ._-California, Job No~ 05~4879-016-00-00, ~c;,g No.~. 9-2160 •. . .... 1 ~ --.· 1 j job No. 05-9065-001-00-0l Log No. 3-1063 Page A-2 .1 1 1 l J --] j ]: J .l .J J .. 1 10. 11. 12. 13. . 14. ... --.:..:.. . 16. ' . 17. ' ] . .: ,. . . .-. :.: 1' ~ • •• ~ • J '·.·.·:' APPENDIX A References (Continued) San Diego Geotechnical Consultants, August 3 o, 19_89, soil Parameters for Retaining Wall Design, Palomar Airport Centre, Unit 2, Carlsbad, California, Job No. 05-4879- 016-00-10, Log No. 9-2041. San Diego Geotechnical Consultants, August 9,. 1989,· Addendum to Additional Geotec}lnical · Investigation, Airport Business Centre, Unit 2, Carlsbad, California, Job No. 05-4879-016-00-00. San Diego Geotechnical Consultants, August 7, 1989, Adgitional Geotechnical Investigation, Carlsbad Airport Centre, Unit . · 2, Carlsbad, California, Jop No. 05-4879-016-00-00, Log No~ 9-1868. San Diego Geotechnical consultants, July. 13, 1989, Well Abandonment Permit, 1921 Palomar Oaks Way '#300, Carlsbad, ·california, Job No. 05-4879-0l~-oo-oo. San Diego_Geotechnical cons~ltants, July 3, 1989, Supplemental Recommendations for Grading, Airport Business Centre, Units 2 and 3,. Carlsbad, Californ~a, Job No. 05-4879-016- oo-oo, Log No. 9-1818. ,. San Diego Geotechnical Consul-tants, · · July 29, 1988, Supplemental Geotechnical Investigation, Carlsbad Airport. Centre, Unit 2, and Offsite Fil~ Area, Carlsbad, California, Job No. 05-4879-0ll-007QO • H. V. Lawmaster & Company, Inc. , 198 o, Prelim~nary Geotechnical Invest:i.gation, Proposed ·Palomar Business Park, North San· Diego county, California: Unpublished Report No. 79- 9394/654G to Palomar Business Park, January 15, 1980 {in~ludes g_rading p).an review letters dated June 8, .. 1982 a_nd September ·27, .1982):... . · Moore & Taber, 1987, Report.of Geotechnical Servi~es, Carlsbad Tract· No~ 81-46', Airport Business· center, Unit No.· 1, City of Carlsbad, California: Unpublished Report to Centre Development Company, February 25, 1987. ..... . . .· ~ . . . . ~. . . . ... · ..... ·· . . .. :, · .. . . ·. . . ·~ ' ;' :; . •'. ·" ' . ) .I .. I l I. r . l ' 1 11 ' I l 1 11 i ·i j ~l TABLE 1 LABORATORY COMPACTION TEST RESULTS JOB NO: ____ __,.,0=5_-=9=0=6=5_-=Q=O~l_-=o=o_-~0~1 ____________ _ DATE: __ ~A~p~r~i~l---=1~9~9~3 __ PROJECT NA,Ml::: ______ ~s~um==i~t~orn=o_B~a~n~k:.::.....;o~f-..;-C~a~l~i~·f~o~r~n~i~·a==----------------- TEST NO. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 .. . . : . " .. . . .. . .. .. . . . " . ... .. . . SOIL CLASSIFICATION Medium Brown Silty Sand Medium Grey Brown Silty Clay Light Grey Brown Tan Silty Clayey Sand Weathered San~iago_ Peak yolcanics Brown Clayey Silty Sand Yellow Tan Clayey sand ""'-t Grey Blue Silty Sand Class 2 Base Light Brown Sand (Shade Sand for storm Drain Backfill) Clasp 2 Base : ~- Class 2 Base Dark Brown Silty Clay Green Tan Sandy Cl:ay .. ' Clas$ 2 Base . . . .. . . · .. . . . ~ . . • . • . ; OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT (%) 12.9 16.8 14.5 15.1 13.0 14.5 12.8 6.1 7.6 7.4 . 7.2. 12.4 :15.7 6.4 - . -· { ; . . . .. MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY (LB/FT3) ' 119.l 121.6 113.5 116.6 115.3 114.5 118.0 138.0 134.9 137.2 .134. 7 122.0 111.0 138.6 ,' . ; . . . . . . . J .:_ I . .. ] -~ ,. ·-~ l ~r~~jC'Ct NC!:e: ~]~~--J»t: rtt5!NESS [E~~~~! {J-(!": ~ TAKE 2 PaQe :i j rield Density Test Results E!evai 1c,n Curve No. Fill Fill Test Test Test or & r..:axilt!'Jlff Mc-isture Dry Relative J .. . ~:.mber D;.t.e Lc•c:atior, Dept;-, Dry iifmsity Coriter,t Der,sity Cvrcpact iori Re111arks 1989 {feet) (c-cf) <oer~nt> (pd) !percent) (see !egerid> -------~-----------------. 0-3/12 SEE Mi'.lP 192 1 119 15.9 !(Ii 91 (90) NU • ~ 09/12 SEE l'iHP 153 4 116 17.1 106 52 (90) NU .. 3 03/13 SEE l".A? 195 3 113 17.9 104 93 (9(1) NU " (rS/1~ SEE KAP 197 :r 1 ·-15.1 104 92 ('30) NU ] 1..) s (13/13 SEE l"llP 199 4 116 16.5 105 91 (90) N'J· ·1 6 09/13 SEE MP.P 200 4 116 18.0 105 91 (90) NU 7 09/13 SE£ /l'IAP 2(12 4 H6 18.2 1(18 93 (90) NU 8 OS/H SEE MP 204 1 116. 1-7.6 106 92 (90} .NU ·) 09/H SEE r.A;: 2(16 4 116 16.1 106 9E: (90) NU l 1(1 09/l'! SEE NAP 207 • 119 17.5 108 91 (90) NU A ., 09/14 SEE MAP 2(18 l 119 14.1 107 90 (90) NU .. A l 12 09/15 SEE Y,AP 209 3 113 15.8 103 92 (90) NU 13 09/15 .. --SEE .. MAP. _ .. _ ,· ______ g10 4 !16 .16.7 107 93 (90} NU .. ., 1't 09/.15 • SEE >:AP 2lC it 116 16.1 105 91 (9(1} l\'U 15 (19/15 ~MAP 19'2 4 116 13.1 105 91 (9(1) NU l ' _J ·16 09/15 SE.E Y.AP 214 3 1-13 15.l 103 92 (90) NU 17 09/15 SEE"MP.? 194 It U6 -15.5 106 52 (90) NU ] 18 09/15 ~EE MA!i 195 4 116 16.,J. 106 92 (90). NU .. 19 OS/!5. SEE !".il? is1 ,:, . 121 16.l 109 ,91 (90} NU .. 20' 09/18 5£E r.AP 193 ~ 116 17.6 107 93 {90) NU ] Zl 09/18 SEE MAP 201 4 116 17.8 105 92 {90) NU 22 ,(:9/16 SEE M.C;i! 205 .; ll& ·-... 10& 91 (~i) NU • 1 • .:. ,..,. .09/18 SE r.P.il 2(12 4 ll6 10.7 103 90 (9(1} R-24 NU ·1 .:..:: I 24 09/18 SEE r~ 2{',Z 4 116 15.6 105 9! (90} NU _J 25 09/18 SEE~? 2(14 3 113 j5.7 102 91 · (90} NU 2£ 09/18, SEr.A;; 2(17 :; 11:i 16.2 102 51 (90) NLI 27 09/19 SE t-1;7;:i 211 7 113 16.4 1'02 90 (90) N'J ., 28 (>9/1'J SE: MAP 206 -113 15.S lOZ S! (90) NU ~- I 29 (fj/2(1 SE:'. !!':iil 2,(:7 3 113 !8.5 !04 ~2 (9(1) N!J I :ID ('9/20 S::£ l'IP.P 213 3 !13 18,(1 lC:2 91 .. (90) NLI l _J 31" /J9/2.0 SEE KA? ~!7 j 1·-18.1 · 103. ·.92. .• (90) · NU A.¥ .. . r 32 0:11;;(1 . 102 ·91 (90) .. Nu J S='.i:: t;ftP w; 3 113 18.0. 33 0'3/2(1 SSE M~? 218 3 Pl 17 •. 6 !(Ii? ·91 (90) NU 7/, (19/21 SEE :r.P.~ 22(; ";< 113 Jg, '.:i 102 90 (9(1) N:.i ... ., l 35 (1~/2! 5;:: If.!?£:: 2!1 3 113 18.3 102 '.11 ('.30) NU _ ... ,t H JS :j':1/21 ;.~=~ ~il:J 2f3~ 3 1 .-: 17.1 102 9! (50) t-~ ... ; .. ~· -~7 (:';i?.~ S£: !(;:~--22~ ' .19 18. i -107 9(1 • (•3(1) •:1:• ] ., .... . ' . .. ;e. ; s)':-12.: . . : •' : : ':, 1(::, ,,,. .. iSOi ,· .. l_~t· re• ~ .. ,.. .. . . ~;~ 4 1)6 . 16.-2 .. ~. . ;, .. :. •-'1~ .. . . . .·~~tf" I-:~.=-.. ·. as . : i:="3i~~ , •• C: ·: .,j' · 116 !5.(J 105 ·91 • \9~>} . tlJ - ' ;.1 ... ,· .. ...... J Ret1ark1 !.ll!ID!i.L . JH> = Recuir~ P~rccfrz :c-:,1~ac~ i ~r,. ?,-,~ = Retested c,n T:st ;;;~ · SC=Sar,d Cor,e! ~J=Nucl~ar, DC=Dt"iYe Cyi., OT=Otht-r '•',',, i-~:: I~~-.:• l..,, ~ Pr,;-. 11.,; .. · th·e · AiF.~JST B:.,'SINESS CE:'ITER1 Ll:HT t . J ~• Cf'"• TABLE Z Page# 2 ' Field Density Test Resulh j Elevatic•n Curve No. Fill Fill 7est Te5:, iHt C•t J >:allilUlii Moisfore Dr)' Relative ril!Q~I?!' hate Lc-catfor, De?th Dry Der,sity Coritent Density C.:"'nact i c•n Rer,iari<s lSBS (feet} (~,ef} (oercer,t> Cpcf) (percent) <see le!!erid) .] --------------J -40 0'3/22 SEE !"itl~ 2~3 4 J-16 iS.5 107 92 (9(1) N" 'tl 09/22 SEE M.'ill 221 3 ,.-!B.O !02 91 (90J NU ,,.J -':2 (;':/..:2 SEE l'.P.!l 218 3 Hi Ja.6 102 90 (g{I) ,~.1 43 (l';l/~:5 SEE fllqp 224 3 113 15.9 l(JJ '32 i9(:) NU '!~ ~,~~ SEE l'!A~ 226 ~ !16 17.9 1(14 90 (90} NU l -95 09/c1, SEE l"~P ~,1 3 l.13 1· ~ 1(:2 91 {90} NU b, .. 46 09/25 SE£ MAii 229 3 i13 !7.2 103 91. !9(1) SC 47 09/25 SE£ XAP 232 J 113 17.0 104 92 (9(1) SC 1 48 0'3/c!.5. SEE MAP 225 3 11-17.3 104 92 (90) Nil _.) 49. 09/25 SEE r:iP C:34 4 116 18.1 105 ·91 i90) N'J 50 09/26 SEE r.P.P c35 4 116 16.1 106 92 (90) SC -, 09/26 SEE !l'Ail 236 .\ 116 16.5 1(16 92 (90) SC j_ 52 09/26 SEE !".AP 237 1! 11_6 ,16.2 106 92 (90) SC J ·53 0'3/26 SEE r,;_qp 235 5 115 .17.3 1(1~ 91 (90} SC s; 09126 · SEE l"JlP 237 s 115 16. 9 104 91 (90} SC ! ,:,: 09/26 SEE l".AP 236 5 115 17.9 1(:3 9-0 {9(1) -SC _J _..., 55 09/26 SEE i:JA_[i 239' 4 116 15.4 104 90 (90} Nt! r-09/27 SEE r,;;ip 223 4 116" 15.2 104 90 (~) N:J .JI -~.S 0'3/27 SEE !'.AP 239 ~ .,~ 1!?.7 103 o~· (~(I} N!J .) : • .> .,,.. 1 i:q 09/2.7· srr r.fiP 240 .... , ... 15.6 1(>9 90 (90) SC ,.:., .-:. .c. 6(: 09/27 ·SEE f:Hil 241 4 116 14.9 106: 52 (9(1) NU J '"f OS/2.i SE l!!C:~ 22-t ~ 1:6 15.5 105 9! ('.,(I) SC P- EZ l19i27 SEE YiHil 227 3 !13 !6.6 104 S3 (90) SC 63 0'3/f7. SE NA~ 231 ~ ,,. a.o 104 so (90) • .. ~ ... b 64 .QS/2E SEE ~:P.r 217 ., !13 17.0 103 92 <SO> SC l ., 6~ (19/c:8 SEE t'.AP 219 f 116 !6.1 106 92 {9\:1) SC 6S (:9/28 SEE M..7&il 230 ,\ :j6 • C. C' Wi.. 92 (9{1) NU 6,.,,.J 1 =1 09/28 S~£ r,;.p 231 ~ i:5 :rt.2 1<10 ·"32 .~,j tt.'J ff. os12e SEE ~;P.P 2& 3 .. -1::. 3 104 o:. {90} N!! J J • ., .... 69 (>'5/23 S:c ~A? 224 . liS !i. 3 !(17 ,.., !~OJ SC ~ .,,. 1 70 O'::i29 ~E t:AP 232 3 113 16._C 103 ':2 i9~) NU -, os1;:,g SEE MA;s 2··=-" 11& !f!.5 ,1(16 92 (90) :-'LJ ,. . .. n . 0'312S SEE ,IA~ 'j·~ 4 116 17.5 · 1(>8 S4 {"3(1) . ·1[iJ. .... ,# 'l -.-iJ'3ic3 SE.: t'ii~ 223 4 ll5 18.5 lti~ G' . (9~1; SC :.! -· J tit (1?./29 Set ?r.AP ~··C' 2 jll 16.6 U(1 91 (9(1) s: .. c.~ 1 .. ,,. j(:;~,2. S::~ !'li:i> z~t> 4 l.i f> !~-2 104 9(1 (9(1) ~:; t.J .., 1S lfJi(-.Z ~£E 11r;i; f;~ 3 : 13· ; E:. l 1(:2 91 (9:)) ... :\:U 77 H!/(;2 S~E ~~~· 2j8 -4 115 l~. '3 ... : .. ,C' '.31. i:3(1) N!.i .. .. , . .., J·-• 78 !1)l((i: ::~ ~!~.t: :.-·:ii ., , .... . -! Of. q_:, . i':KI} st: ........ ., l#.~ !,.• tr . .. .f"j • l(:,"(!2 . S£E _. .. :~.:J :-:•:-' :-:3 :5. 9 !(i:i 5! ;j(l) :-:: 1....:-..,. .. .... :: ] B~arks Legend: h,iii =-Req:iirec ;l?:·.:er,; :c,r::;ac:; 1=,r •• :H~ = ~etes:ea c-,r._ '!'e:t ;:.;:! S~?Sar~ t~!~~ M.l=;=Nuciea?', DC=i>ri"c:1 C;:.: 1Tf=Oth=r l , ,. ·PtoJ~t Nal!S: AI liPORi KlSlf<IESS CENiER, UNIT l ~ TflBt.E I! Pa£e v 4 l Field Density Test Results E!evotior, Curve Ne.. fill Fill J: ·;est Test Test or & /:l~icil.'l•Jlo1 ~~:,ist1Jre Dry HEl;;tive ffu11ber Date Locatior, Depth Dr/ Density Cor,ter.t DPY1S,t)'. Cvr.,pacr. i c,r, iie;r.orr:s 1989 (feet> (µcf) (percent} <ocn (perc:1mtl (see l e~er,dl l -------------------------- 120 10/10 SEE 1:AP 258 3 113 H.~ 103 92 CSO) s~ 121 10/10 SEE P'.AP • ;:55 J 113 16.(1 !(rJ 'i~ (90) SC l l2i! 1(1/11 SEE MAP 255 4 l ;£ 14.5 1(16 s~ (9;)) Nt: j J~J l(•/11 SEE .MA? 254 I, 116 16. 4 1(17 '93 .,,,. .. (9(l} r,LI ·-=--10/!0 see i.ap 20.: C 115 !3.4 102 BS ('3(1} IH25 U:.i u .. J 1 1£'5 l(t/11 see aiap 220 5 115 ·13.2 104 91 (9(1) NLI 126 10/11 see i:sap 243 3 113 13.B !03 91 ('30) NU 1'!7 1(1/H see 1tlap 2i'9 4 116. 16.(1 104 9(1 {'30} SC l 128· 10/11 see 111ap 240 3 113 i4.5 102 91 · (~)) NiJ ·129 10/11 see 11ap 2.57 3 113 lit.& 1(13 92 {9{1) SC 130 10/12 see rap 2~ ~ 115 13.6 104 91 (9(1) N'J r· 10/12 see 1Ea? 2"".JO 1 l19 .--107 so (9(1) NiJ .) .. ;~.u 132 10/12 see J11ap 220 r: 1 •r 15.1) 104 91 (90) NU J •-' 133 1(1/lC: see map 223 • ·U9 13.5 107 90 (90) SC J .. 1~ 10/12 see 11ap ,, &6 i 119 14.2 107 91 ('30) SC 135 1(1/12 see ma::i ,'23 1 Jl9 14.8 109 92 C90) NU _, 136. 10/12 see r.ap Z2£ ; 11'.1 lE.8 107 90 (901 NU .. '137 10/12 see map 23~ . !19 14.8 108 91 ('Kl) N!J • 13B· 10/13 see i:ap 259 " 115 lS.6 104 91 (90) 1-lll ., 1 1~ 10/13 see 11ao 254 4 H6 13.3 106 9.? (90) N'.j HO 10113 see r;2µ ,,c_ 4 116 16.1, 108 93 (9:)) SC ., C..J/ r~ ·_ ..... 1i.• 10/13 see map ~ 4 116 15.9 105 91 (90} NU ... 142 10/13 see aaµ 249 • 11,91 !~ .. ~ !{17 90 (90) NU • H:i . 1(1/13. see ~p 251 5· 1 • C' H.2 104-90 (9(1) · Nil _., },i,j 10/13 set> Mao 2'10 5 1 • ... j3.5 103 90 .• (9(1) SC . .., .1 145 10/16 see Ifill> ~i;B 5 115 13.l 103 90 (90) NU. 146 1(1/16 see ~i'.? c:52 l:, 115 12. 7 1(13 so (9(1) NU J i'.7 iono see ;;;ap 255 :: •!" •=--. 10{ 9(1 (9(:) NIJ :.~ ... ~ . .: !~8 lG/1£ ~ee saµ 2&1 ,j llS ,· -1(15 SI (90) SC .tl-• ., 149 1(1/,S see 1=~ 26(1 .; . ', 1!t0 1(16 ~ {30) c;r· -;,.o ~i. _l 150 10/1& see i:aC ~61 r: H5 16.1 !(l'i 91 f9(1) NLI J l'"' 10/lf, see aao ,i., s 115 16.2 104 91 (90>.. M.1 J•, ... 152 •10/!l see 1,1a:; ~.,a 3 j)3 16.0 103 91 ('30) SC I. !SJ ·1~i1t· ,-~:; 5. . ·~· 16.4. 104 -. . 91 (9{1) N'J. I !:!:e !lia!l .• ~;J •• J -~- 154 1(1/16 see .;a:; c£3 '! ,.~ 1't.7 1()6 92 ('30) NU. ••b 1 155 10/li see r:;a;> -.:c: ~ .. , ... JG.8 105 . 91 ('30) SC L..;.J •• o 15& l\J/17 s1:e ;;:a::i .-.ro 119 n.4 107 91 ('301 NU i:,..,,lJ 157 10i17 see ,r.:a:c 264 . !)'3 J3.1 '1(18 31 ('30) N[J -· ... .. . , .. _ · · !SB· !0/:.7 . SI:!: '!,er. .l.67 • H9 13;4 107 91 (90) · SC J •c:·~ ir,··!-c'30r .. : .. ·t-1.~ .. : S.e!:' ij;i,j 256 l1~ !.l.D· 1(17 '3! .. . ,... .. .. t.! ..... .. . .... ~--. --. . . ·. , ... . . J. Bemarks·Legehd: flil = Requirfd, i:e(~!?:,-: .C,~l:IOilCtfor,! ~-~i = Retesteo o~ Test f;;t~ SC=Sarrci Ci:,ne, NLl=N1Jdear, DC=Drive Cyl,, OT=Other . -, __ ;. : I •• l , . ·-PrGJEct ~ar.ie: idRPORT oosrn£SS CENTER, ~IT 2 ~· !H'4!.i: 2 .. Page~ 5 l Field Densjty Test Results ] i:.jeva;lor: Curve N,:,, Fi:i. Fi!l iest Test Test Of' L MiilihiUI{, ?: ... .:,istvre Dry r.elative Nuli!b!?r Date !..ocation DeD;h Dry r:er,si !y C.c,ritent Dem,ii y C..:1?t1i:tc1Ct j c,n -~=::j.::1·:.:= 1969 {feet> <pct> !pi:rcent> ipcfl (pi:l"cerst} (s:1: .: e~er,di l ------------------- 161) 10/:7 see wao 263 It 1!6 13.& 10:5 ljt (90) N:J .,. 1£1 !0/17 see l!ap 269 . 119 14.9 :(17 -~· ('3(1) £,:(j • l~ 10/17 see 111ap 26S 1 l 19 15,S 107 90 {SOj N.J 163 1(1/17 see ;nap 261 f H9 16.3 ioa 91 i9(1) tl:J • 164 10117 see r..ap ~Ee-1 119 13.6 107 9:) (9(;) NU l 165 1(1/18 see IAiip 265 5 115 14.4 104 91 (·3(1) NU 166 10/18 see~µ 268 " 116 l't.6 106 92 (90) SC lf>7 10/15 see 111a? 270 " 116 H.3 105 91 (9(1) NU 1 168 ~0/18 see 111ap ,4a It 116 16.4, 105 91 (30) NU •. 169 J0/18 see map 242 4 116 H.9 105 91 (90) NU 170 10/18 s_ee-Ji:ap 235 4 l16 17.0 105 91 (90} SC 17! 10/18 see 11ap 230 1 119 17.6 108 91 (9(1) NU 172 10/18 see liliip ,:,-"'\ 1 119 17.9 1(19 9c! (9(1} SC ._,)C;_ ] .173 10/18 see a1ap 2:W 4 116 15.9 105 91 (9(1) NU 17ft 10/18· see l:iiP 250 4 116 14.9 105 91 (90) NU ] li5 10/18 see ,iap 250 4 116 14.Z 105 91 ('3{1) NU 176 10/19 see nap 255 • 119 15.4 108 92 (90} NU .l -1n· !0/19 see e1ap 253 1 119 15.8 109. 92 (90) SC 178 !0/19 SEI! map 260 4 116 15. 7 10~ 91 (90) NU ·1 179 10/19 see wap 262, 4 116 J5.3 ' 104 90 {9')) NU 180 10/19 . see, :saµ c.10 5 115 , 16.4 1(13 ':!O (9(;) NU 181 10/19 see mp Z71 5 .115 15.0 103 9(1 (SO) C:T' ~ .,!!.. le2 10/lS see 11ap zse 1 11'3-12.9 107 90 (90) ,NU 183 10/19 see 11ap ·• 237 4 116 11.a 103 90 i90} . N..! 18; 10/~~ see 11:ap 250 4 116 .. 14.3 105 91 i90) . tl;J l I 185 10/19 see Map 238 " 116 14.~ 105 91 {'30) NU 16£ 10/20 see a:ap 237 -1 119 13.8 107 90 (90) NU. 187 F.J/ESJ . see L1a~ 269 4 H6 13. 1 106 9.? (90i r,:u 188 l(l/2(; !:EE li!isi:i 259 1 119 14.1 100 91 (SO) SC 189 !0/f.'O see i1ap 255 1 !19 14.3 lOS ':H (9(•} ~(' . ~ .. J 19(1 10/?.C• see Bia:;; 262 1 119 13.3 1(1'3 se . i9(1} ~J 191 1(1/2.0 265· I 119 13.9 108 91 i90) NU sea 111ap ~ . 1S2 10/£'(1 see Joiap 255 4 116 15.1 105 91 (90} NU J· 193 10l?.O see m .. p 258 4 1'. is.a 1(14 so· {9(~j. &'U ,.i:, :s.i, lQ/c_,CI see mali 268 1 119 ,14.s 1(17 91 (90} N'J l 195 10/23 see ltio?!l 2E7 i 119 13.B 107 90 {9(1) M.! !SE/ 10/23 se1:· •.ap 25$ 1 1!9 . 12. 1 l07 '31 ('30} N:J ·197 10/23 • see tia;:. · z.7~ 1 119 15,6 107 _go· {90) NU - : -J 198 .. 10/2~ ·· si.e Ml::.P c:52 l !ls 16: l 107 so (90) sc· 1~1 !"0!23.~ .• ~~~ lliaj ~'61:-. I J ":I 13.0 .. 1n ~4 {90) f"' ·-.•-\\J ·• ... _ . ' ~ ., ' J BJ1or.liu.WD!U. II~}= Required ?erc-ent Co~µactian, R-\!t = Retested an Test #3, SC=Sand ·ec,r,e, NU=Nuclea,.1 DC=Drive Cyl., OT=Other ,.,. -, -' I ---Project Nai,e: AL'lPO?.T SJS!N:SE CE~TERt u:~!1 ~ ,,··:. . 7A:"~E :: Pa~2 !l 6 I Fitld Density Trst Re1ulti I £levaticm Curve No. Fill F! ll Tei:, Test Test or .\ ~axireul!I 1':c·isture Dry Relatl'.e :,u?llb::r !.hte i.c•cat ior, .Deotr. Dry Density Cc,r,tent Der.sity Cco1cpact1on Remarks I 196': (feet: ipcf} · <pe1-:erit} Cpcf} (percer,t) (see legerrdl, -------------- 21,1'..) 10/23 set> ;:;ap 263 . Il~ 13.9 j(,6 91 ('30} NU • ZC•! 10/2~ i:ee ~1a:: 266 1 119 1 .... 9 J1! 94 (9{)} NU l 202 10/23 !:Ee lllap 264 ... H5 12.4 1(15 92 (90} NU J 203 1(1/23 see 1o1at1 f:7,,.i 1 "'l lj.0 111 94 (90) SC .J 204 10/2,j see .map 272 l li9 16.a? 1(17 90 (9(1) NU I 205. 1(1/2~ see r.ap 21i l U9 16. 9 108 91 (90) NU 20& 10/2~ see Alap 268 5 115 .14.0 !05 91 (9(1) tfLl I 207 1(1/24 see roap 26'3 s HS 15.0 10-\ 91 (90) NU 208 10/24 see raap 270 ... 115 14.3 104 91 (90) NU J 209 10/2~ see map 269 5 us 13.9 104 91" (9(1). NU I 210 10/2:4 see r.ap 271 C' 115 13.4 10.; 91 {90) NU J 2jl 1012..; see Jl!ap 2.7() 4 116 15.(1 106 91 (9(1) SC 212 10/2.\ see ,tap 2;39 4. 116 15.1 105 91 (90} NU l 213 10/2.\ see map 235 3 113. 15.2 103 91 (90) NU 21ft 10/26 see r.ap ., 230 5 115 13.2 104 Sl (~0} NU -I 2.15 10/26 see 111ap 2.\5 5 115 13.5 104 91 (9(1) SC 216 10/.26 see map 2.70 5 115 12.5 104 91 -(90) N'J 2.17 10/26 see 111ap 2.12. 5· !15 13.5 .. 1M 91 (90) ·NU . , 218 10/25 see 6is? 2.67 4 116 14~ 7 . 11}7 93 (90) NU I Zi9 10/26 see 111op . 270 5 115 .!it. It 103 90 (90) NU 22(1 10/26 see 111cp 269 5 115 12.. 7 104 9~ (90) NU J 221 10/26 see Ma;> 2.71+ 5 115 13.8 105 92 (90) NU 222 10/f.7 see :.ail 270 5 115 13.3 t03 90 (91)) N'J 223 10/2.7. see man· 276 5 us· 13.5 104 ,91 ·(9(1)' SC i 22-'i. 10/2.7 see J:a? -277. 5 115 14.5 1-04 91· ('30) ., NU 22.S l0/2.7 see !Gal> 279 5 115 13.'5 105, 92._ (90) NU 226 10/2.i see sa:> 2s1 5 115 13.0 1~ S2. (9(1) NU J: ·227 1012.i see 11:c.p 2.69 5 as 12.4 105 92 (90) NtJ 226 10/27 see L:ap --.--5 115 13.3--105 91 (90) NU .:.~I • 229 1(1/27 see itap 272 5 • •t:' 13.0 104 90 (90). N!J ~.I., J-, 23() 10/27 set> -111ap 255 5 115 12.,7 103-'30 . (90) NU Z31 ' -1(1/f!t :s.11e·map .. ,.264 5: 115 13.9 106 92 (90} NU l '2~. . l!l/30 ~ee ·Ida~. ... ·?68, a···. 12·1 ·14.2 1I3 ·94 (90) • NU .. · 233 · ·1(1/30 see. rca;; 26"8 . · 3': ul' 13.0. 103 i 91 .·. (90) ' NU .. :- . ,. 234 10/30 see 1.1ao 268 2 121 15.lt 11-L 94 (90) NU J. 235 10/31 see 111ap -s. 5 115 16.0 103 9(1 (90). .,NU ~-c: 10/31 see lliao -3 5· 115 15.8 · 104. 91 (9()). NU !:.l- _237 • 19/31 se~ ma:r. -6 5 115 16.1 J(15 91 (9Q) NU . • ... -~-t;; • -, • . -I; C' • U5 ·15.7t· ·103" 91). ~SOJ NU . f . .. "" . ,JV!,, see ""' . • J '· 7· 2,&::, . 1(fZ --· .. . . e:n. ,· 1013!-. S!!!! i:ap. •:. ·s . HS,._ 15f 1 93 .. i90'l· . ·r-:u • I • • • • .:. • . .:-· . .. •. . . . . ~ : . .. . : . .. , .. .. • · . i B~marks Legendi .. . CH) = iiequired Per-cer,~ Coepaction, ?.-ti-= Retest::d on Test ~t, SC=Sarid Ct•rie1 N'J=Nuclear, DC=D:ive Cyl~! OT=Other . ' ,. l ~ .. .. .... _ P,·c•Ject ~~e-: tHRPCR1' K1Si NEES CE!~';t~! t:~~17 .:. i~E 2-Pagel! i 1 Field Density Test Results t Eleva; !Ol'l Curve -Ne•. Fill F1U j ie!:t ir:st Test c,r & fl:aximur,; Moisture Dry Reiative NWtber Date t ,.. Deptn Drr Dr:r,si ty Cor,tent Density Cor,;p .. ct i c,r, Rer~arks :..oca~1or1 19~9 (feet) iocfi {percer,t) (pcfl (percer:t) ·(see iegendi: ) ---~ --------- ~.;o 10/Jl see r,aµ in ,: HS 13,9 109 95 (,90) NU J 241 l0i3! see-map 26: 5 HS H.2 l(lb 93 (9(l) N!: J 24;? 11)/31 see ri:op 264 IC' .. ,: l"" ·IC' 106 94 ('30) N;J J LhJ .,, ., 243 H/01 see •1ap 281; 1 119 12.1 uo 93 ('3(1) NU 2.¥. 11/0l see Map 285 ' 1:9 12. i 1~ 92 <SO> N-J • I ~·r il/01 see map 5 115 13.5 105 91 (90) NU .... ., 246 11/01 see a;ap -6 5 115 t;3. 0 101 ·88 (90) 252 NU 2.47 11/01 see ,,ap -6 5 115 H.9 104 90 (9{1) NU I 2.48 11/01 see 111ap -262 5 115 17.1 107 93 · (90) NU 2.49 11/(11 see rsap 262 5 HS 16.3 109 95 (90) NU l 2~-0 11/01 see liaP 2.~ l 119 16.7 107 90 (90) NU J 2Zl 11/01 see map 284 1 !19 17.8 109 92 • CS(I} N'J 252' 11/01 see map -6 5 115 13.8 103 90 (90) NU I 253 11/~ see 1J1ap 72 5 115 18.1 103 90 (9(1} NU 254 H/02 see map ., 73 5 115 17.0 105 91 (90) NU ~..,5 11/02. see 111ap 71 5 115 16.5 108 94 (90) SC _]· 256 11/02. see Map i3 5 115 15.0 105 92 (9(1) SC 2.57 11/0.J see a1ap • 71 5 us i-;.1· 106 92 (90) SC L. 258 11/03 see map 74 5 115 14.9 105 92. (90) NU ] 259 11/03 · see 111ap 75· 5 115 15.7 105 92 (90) NU . 250 11/03 75 5 115 17,5 · 106 92 (90} NU 1-see 111ap ?~• . 1.1/06 see 111ap 272 4 116 16.0 104 90 (90) NU J '"I),. 262. ll/06 see 111ap 273 4 116 17.8 105 91 (90} St: 26l !1/('5 see a1aµ 274 4 11ii 15.3 106 9~ (90i NU I 264 11/05 see 111ap 276 4 116 16.1 105 92 <SO) Nli 1 265 11/06 see 14ap 278 2 121 15'.0 109 90 (90} SC 2'"o5 11/06 see map 280 4 :16 13.6 11)6 91 (9'1} NU j 267 11/(lb see niap 262 4 :16 16.-4 105 91 (90) tJLJ 268 !1/06 see ~ap 286 4 116 15.6 105 91 i90} Nl.l ! 269 l!/06 see map 284 4 116 15. ! 1(16 92 i9(1) SC )-270 '11/05 see 14ap 280 i as 11.2 107 91 (90) NJ 271 1!i(l7 see ·raa_p_ . 284 1 .1_!9 15.6 •... 107 91 (90) NU f72 11/07 see aiap 285 2 121 15.9 . 1'10 91-(90J. ~u l •• ·273 H/07 see raap -. -286 .; !f6 · . 15.4 105 91 (90) NU j 274 11/0i see =ap ·2aa 119 16.8 107 90 (90) ~ ! . J 275 11/(17 see map 288 • 'IQ 14.9 108 92 (·30) NU ,. ;.-~ 276 11/07 see r,;ap en .4 116 17. 1 105 91 (90) NJ I '?.i7 ,11/07 se~ Map 27~ 1 119 17, 9 1(1~ 9c . (90} NU ~1,:r .li/07" see reap ?i5 1 •· 119 ·--.. 108 .. 9~ (50l NU J.··. . 'I, I ?-7'1-. 11t01 see.ll!ap E".10 ,5. 115· . ·. 1~.5 104 .. . ·. 91 (99) . C;'' • ... 1:-•. · . .. ... ·· . I ·.·-,·. ~ Bl!l!ll"kli L1.g1nd1 (M) = Required Percer,t Col•paction,. R-n = P.e;ested-C•l'I ies: H, SC=Sanci Cone, NIJ=Nuclear, DC=Drive Cyl. 1 OT=Other f l I l l l i I I i I l i __ L I .. l- J J ., iest 7H,t Nulll~er Date 158': -----280 1li08 26.l :1Ic~s 282 1110s 2.53 ll/08 ZB't 11/06 ,;)0-...... , 11/08 11/06 11/08 288. 11/08 289. 11/08 290 11/06 291 11/08 29"2 11/09 293 11/09 294 !1/(,"3 295 11/09 2'".16 · 11/ 09 2Si 11/09 29S 11/09 299 11/(~ 300 11/('9 301 11/~'9 3(12. !l/09 30.! !1/10. 304 11/lO 305 .1110 3(16 11/10 Test Location ------see c;ap see 11ao see .-.a;; see 11ap !:EE llla!i see •1ap see rAap see map see map see aap see »ap · see 11ap see 11aµ see 111ap see map see .11ap see 11ap see 11ap see 1oa;, see l!iap sel? ,rap see raap SEI? Jr.at! see 111ap sel? 111ap seer.tap see aail YJ7 ! 1/!0 SEE llla:l 306 !1/!0 see ~ap ~09 11/10 see ~iaµ i10 · · 313 3Ft 11/li see il!ii? · 11/13 ._see 11ap .1ill3 see 1.ap l!/!-3 see map 11/13 sel? f.'li!P see L~aii see l!la;P 315 11/13 ~16 . :1!/13 31i. H/14 see rcao 1-1/llt · s'ee· 11aa· Hit{ /sei.· sa~.-... . ... · .. • Elevation or D~pth ifeet) 264 274 296 .295 271 275 277 298 297 276 269 2.77 278 270 271 · 280 273 21; 212· 274 275 27'5 274 273 278 268. 2613° • · 2.7ft ··211t 21s 273, · if'.'iBLE 2 Field Density Teat ·Results Ct1rve r.o. & Maximum Dry Density Cpd) ----5 s 5 5 5 4 4 5 5 4 1 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3· 5 5 5 .3 5 115 l-15 115 U5 116 116 115 115 116 119 116 116 116 116 116 116 116 119 1!5 116 116 116 .!16 113 115 115 115 113 115 Fill Nc,isture Cc,r,ter,t. Cperc;rmt) -----1'i.3 15.1 17.5 17.7 lfi,O 13. 6 11.0 17. 1 · 16.1 16.4 15.0 14.B 13.8 14.2 15.5 15.7 17.6 18.5 15.5 13.b 17,5 15.7 !5.9 15.8 17.5 i6, 1 lf.6 !6.3 17. 1 15.6 .'5 115 18.3 ? .. _jJ5 17.5. 5 · .. . HZ·. · · •' 15, 6 s -1;s :7.. 7 5 llS ·: 17,6 . 5 276" 5 115 16. 5 · 267. . 5· HS 13:0 .• 27.4 ; " 1 :: '119 -1~. '5 . '· 269, . 5 . -·:115 ,. • ·13;-4 .. .. .. ·· .. ·- fill Dry rier,sity (pcfi 107 1(14 103 106 104 1(15 1v2 104 104- 10'5 109 106 11)6 105 106 106 105 104 108 1('6 105 106 105 106 1¢2 1(11; 10~ 103 1<)3 103 1(15 j(IJ, · Page# 8 Relative Cc,mpaction Cpercer,t> 93 91 90 93 91 91 69 91 91 91 92 93 92 91 92 91 91 90 91 92 91 92 91 91 · 91 91 -~o 9(1 91 90 91 91 Reraarks Csee l egeriol (90) Nil (9(1) SC (90> NU i90l NU <90) SC (90} (90) 291 (90) (90) (90) (90) (90} (90) (90) (90) (90) (90) (90) (90) (9(1} (90) (90) (90) (90) (90) (90) (90) (9\;} (90} {9()) (90) (90) Ntl NU NU SC NU SC NU NU NU NU SC NU SC NU NU NU NU NI.I NU Mi NL! Nil · NU NU NU NlJ · NU ' · 1.(15 ' .92' · (.90) tWl (90) .. N':J .'.SC· SC.·. -J.C,1, 103 10s ~ • 91. 9(1 92 (9(1) 90 (90) 93 (90} 91. (90) . · 105 · · .9~ ' . (9(:} NU NU NU NU ~J . . .. ... . .. Re11arks Ll?ger,d: . . mu = Required Percer:i; Cc,u;oactic<Ji, ·R-ff = Reh!~teii c,r; Test .H; SC=S,m:i Cor~~ Nt.i=Nuclear, DC=Drive Cyl., OT=Other ' ' ~ ' . .· -. ' . . J I , Pr~JEct Narce: AIRPORT KJSINESS C'ElfftR, UNli 2 . . . TABLE Z Page II 9 l Field Density Test Resul.h J El evat 1ot1 Curve lio, Fill .... l. r1 ... -... Test Test &, Y.iaxir.ura ~-ii:tiJre Dr)' Rel,;tive ,es~ c,r Nua.ber Di3te Locatic,r, Deptn Dry Der,si ty Conter,t Density Co!Aoad i c,r1 Reu:arks 1989 (feet} iocfJ iperceritJ (µcfl (percent) (i:ee le9end) l --------------.------------ 3a) 11/H see sap 273 5 115 15.7 105 92 (90) SC j21 il/1'\ see r.ap 270 5 H5 16 • .:'. 105 92 (90) 5-C 32~ 1'1/H see 11ap 272 5 HS 12.1 105 9Z (90) Ni.I 323 1.1/1'; see »ap 277 5 115 13.2 104 91 (90) MJ 32~ 11/15 see -r.ap 27't 5 115 13.8 106 92 (90) NU l 325 H/15 see Map 276 5 115 12.8 107 94 (90) NU 326 11/15 s_ee map 276 5 115 15.1 107 93 (90) SC 327 11/15 see 11ap 278 5 115 15.5 107 94 {9(1) SC 328 11/15 see11ap 280 5 115 13,7 103 90 {90) NU .329 H/.15 see .11ap ZS2 5 115 15.0 103 90 (90) NU 330 11/15 see 1tap 283 5 115 11. 9 105 92 (90) NU 331 11/15 see map 225 5 115 14.9 105 92 (90) N'J --~ 11/15 see map 265 C 115 13.8 109 95 . (90) N'J ,l.l1. ,J J 333 11/16 see JDap 2'23 5 115 15. 3 104 91 (90) NU 334 11/16 see lliap 225 4 116 17. 7 1(17 ·93 (90} N'u 335 il/16 see ilap 2'& 5 115 lit.It 108 94 (90) NU l 336 U/16 see 111ap 225 5 115 13. 9 110 96 (90) NU _J 337 ' 11/16 see map 2-.:1, 5 115 14.1 109 95 (90) NU 338 11/16 see map. 277 4 116 17.1 1(17 93 190) N'J ] :333 11/l6 see map 270 4 116 17.9 106. 92 (90) NU 3110 11/16 see .map 276 . 1 Wl 12.3 110 93. (90) SC l ~ .. 3U 11/16 see maµ 272 l 119 12.9 HO 93 {9'\I} SC 342 11-/16 see 11csp 276 l 119 13.4 110 93 (90) NU 3~3 11/16. see· J.iap 274 ! 119 H.6 110 93 (90) ~'ti . 34-'t · 11/16 see map 270 " 116 :4.6 107 93 (90) NU J 3-\5 11/17 see 1ap 213 1 119 12~5 109 92 (SOJ SC 346 11/17 see map 275 .l 119 12.4 106 91 (90) SC J":7 11/17 see raap 276 5 115 ....... !05 92 {90) NU ,.), .) 348 11/17 see i:;;;p 27'i 1 11'3 13.0 107 91 ('30} NU 349 11/17 see 11.ap 271 5 !!5 H. 7 !(13 90 (90) N'J { I 3~-0 11/17 280 5 t·• C" 14. 3 106 93 {SO} N:J / !:EE? lliap • l.J ) 351 . 11/17 • 28(1_ 5. 115 12.5 106 92 (90) .. tfJ see 14ap ~"2 H/17 2~2 : 5-115 15.2 103 90·· (90) 353. rfil. see r,ap ' 353 11/17 225 5 115 15.B !O~ -91 (9(1) NU j s~ rap 354 11/17 see map 222 .c jl5 13.4 109 95 (90) NU . ., } 355 11/17 see map 225 5 115 14. l 109 . 95 (9(1) NU 356 11/17 ~ee lllii!J 226. 5 . . ., 12. 7 1(17 94 (3(1) NU .. ., 357 !li17 see ;pap 228 5 H.5 13.6 llJB 94 (9(1) NU _.·)· 358: 11/-17 see tiap C:~7 .: .. :::-11s· 14 •. 5 11)9 qi::. {'3,1)). NU ,J -~ ·35~. · . HH.-0 se.e. ·"-a? . . 27:S ~s 1!5 H.~ . :.i(t5 .•_-Q~ {~(;} . Nt; _.._ . . . •• I .. .• ... > .. 1 B111111i::k1 . L!?.ll!W. J _(!l) = _Reqqired Percent Ctoit?actior~ fi-j¥ = Retested on Test~, SC=S~r,d Con!>, M.J=ttuclears DC=Dr1ve Cyl., OT=Other j ., .. 1 ProJect Nai:.e: AIR~ORT BUSlll.'ESS CEtUER, UNIT ? 1 I J __ J l J l !. j . ' . j j Test Test Nuwber Date 1989 -----360 11/2.•) .361 11/20 JGa 11/20 353 l1/f'O 364 11/20 365 11/20 366 11/21 367 11/21 368 11/2.1 369 11/21 370 11/21 371 11/22 372. 11/22 ·3r:r 11/22 31.\ 11/~ 375 11/ZZ 376 11/ZZ 377 11/22 378 ·11122 379 111:::2. JBO U/2.7 381 1!/27 362 H/27 383 11/27 ·3M 11/2.7 385 386 387 388 389 11/r!I 11/27 11/28 11/28 11i28 Test locatfor, see Map sea Map see 111a!} see Map see aiap see 111ap see roap see 11ap see 11ap see 11ap see 11ap see 111ap see aiap see Jtap see 111ap see 111ap see 111ap see map see 111ap see Jia? see-map see raap see map see !lap see .ap see map see 11ap sea ~ao see map see .t1ap 390 11/26 see map 391 11/28 • ~ea ,ap J9c . 11/26 see l!ap · · .. 33.1 · 11128 see map 394 · H/29 see llii:ip 395 11/29 see map 396 11/~ see rcop. 397 11/29. see. 14ao ·!.aa i , _. }· ,: ,;~ i ;!;~ ' ;: :: . : . .. : .-:~. . ·.... .. .·.; . : ; •. . .. •"• . . ..-... .-. .. . .... Elevatic,r, c,r Depth (feet) 2.66 285 235 235 268 237 269 270 2.38 260 2.64 270 239 262. 270 194 195 264 197 199 265 2.67 201 2.02: 268 205 206 208 269 270 2.10 2.11 • 272. · .. 216· 214 213 273 ·. 215 Z75 Field Dtnsity test Res~lts Curve No •. & Jilax i WJIA Dry .Coer,si ty (pcf) 3 113 ;; 113 3 113 3 11.3 ·5 115 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 3 .:; 3 5 4 4. J. 115 115 115 115 115 115 115 115 115 115 115 115 HS 115 · 115 115 113 113 113 113 113 113 1!~ 1.15 116 116 llj Fill lfoisture Cor,ter.t (oercer,t} 17.0 15.3 12,5 14.3 15,6 12.5 13.3 11. 7 17.4 1.3'.1 16.2 17.0 14.2 12.9 U.9 .... C' ""·., 12.5 13.9 12. 9 18.0 15.9 16,9 13.2 12.8 13.5 14.7 12. 1 16.5 14.0 14,4 12. 7 5 :. .)J~i.: ... 13.0 ' 1 3 4 ·• .. ., ' . 115 ' j6.0 119 · 14.1 114 114 113 116·.' 115 • · 17.0 18. l 17.0 ·16._8 •o• !o F. ·1 l!. Dry Density fpcfl 102 10.; 98 103 103 105 103 103 104 103 11)3 106 105 105 105 1(14 104 10S 10-4 102 102 103 102 l(t2 102 10~ 105 10i l(J6 102 -iv?, . . : 105. :·1oa i04 104 102 • !(15 • ·105 Page ii !(I Relative Cc,r,pac~ion (percent} Remarks (see le!!er,di 91 (90) SC (90) SC 86 91 90 (90) 363 Ni.i (90) NU (90) 1-11 90 92 92 90 90 91 9() 90 92 92 92 92 91 91 9?. 90 90 ·91 91 90 91 91 9(1 91 92 (90} (9(1) (90} {90) (90) (90) (90) (90) (90) (90) (90) (9(1) (90) (90) (9(1) (90) {90) (9(1) (90) 190) (90) (90) (90) (90) (90) 92 ('.10) 91 (90) 93 (90). 92·. . .. (W) 91 (90} 91 9? 91 91 91 . . <SOi (90) i9(1) : )9(>) . (_1(:) .• ~. JI • NU SC SC NU MJ NU SC NU NU NU SC NU SC t,Li t{U NU NU NU SC SC Nl.i NU t-."J lfJ . SC NU NU NiJ Ntl . J · Remarks Legend:· . ·(##) ::; R_equired Percer,t Ccif:lllaction,. R-t!i = Retes;ed on Test a_i, SC=Sar1d C:ine, NU=Nadear, DC=Drive Cyl., OT=Other :· . . ' l ., L • -ProJect /lac~: J:UP.PDRT ~SiNESS Cti\1'ER1 i,."llT 2 iAB'..E 2 Page# 11 ' ] Field Densjty Test Results Ele'laiictr, Curve Ne•. f'P 1 •• Fill J. Test Test Test or ~ fliaxu~,.r~ /i'.c,is.\1re Dry Rela,;ve Nuraber Date Lcieation _Depth Dry Der,sity CMter,t .D!msity Coraoadicr, Rernari-s !989 (feet) ipcfl ii:erc!mtl <pcf) (percent) (!:ee lE~er,lii J --------------------- 'tOO U/29 see 1ap 276 1 119 1'i.7 108 92 ISO} NU ,4()1(1 H/30 see map 217 3 113 ' -.,. 103 92 (';j(I) SC ,it:;,,,._ :j 'i02 11/3;) see mar, 219 3 113 1E.. 4 103 91 ('.:)(;} NU J,'•-11/JO see ~ap 220 3 113 15. 3 liJ3 91 i9(1) NU ..,.., .... .1;04' .. n/30 230 3 .. , ·-. 1(13 q~ (9(ll NU • see r;ao J .ii.I .:.Jo • .4 oL J 405 11/JO see 111aD 222 5 115 13.1 107 94 (9(1) NU lt06 11/30 see map z:,,c: 3 113 15.-7 103 91 (90) SC .. ., 4<.17 11/30 see li1<1? 227 3 113 13.5 104 92 (90) NU 1 108 11/22 see raap 230 5 115 12.8 109 95 (90) NU .1f(l9 11/22 see ;nap 22£> 5 115 13. It 111 97 (90) NU l ) 410 11/22 see maµ 2~ .,. 115 15.1 109 96 (90) NU ., ltll 11/22 Eee 11aµ 227 5 115 13.6 108 94 (9',)) NU 412 12/0lt see map 228 r: 115 14.2 106 92 (90) NU ., J, 413 HU04 see map 224 5 115 13.9 104 90 (9(1) NU .;14 12/04 see map 226 5 115 14.0 1(18 94 (90) NU · 415 12/01 _see Map 22'3 5 1 "'' 12.9 1(1/t 91 (90} NU ~., _) - 416 12/01 see 11ap 278 5 115 13.5 103 90 (90) NU 417 12/01 see map 2.30 5 115 13.0 103 90 (90} .NU 418 12/01 see 111ap 232 5 ll5 12.3 106 93 csor t(tJ )_ 419 12/01 see .11ap 234·,. 5 115 12.0 106 93 (90} NU 't20 12/01 see 11ap 235 5 115 13.S 104 91 (90) SC ' 421 12/01 see map 236 5 115 H.0 105 92 (90) SC "~ 12/01 see map 2c6 5 115 15.4 105 92 (90) NU 4'•7 12/01. see U:ap :?29 5 115 , -r: !04 91 (9(1} NU c,., ~..)."' 424 12/01 see map C39 5 115 15. 0 104 91 (90) l'llJ 1 .;zs !2/0i 5ee ma;i 230 5 115 !7.9 105 91 (90) SC I lt25 12/0l see ma~ ~-c: 5 us 14.3 1c:s 92 (90) SC L.)J l 427 12/01 5ee map 243 5 115 1~.(1 105 91 ('.3(1) Nl.J 428 12/01 238 s l ": 15.2 104 91 (90} NU J see 111ap h) I Jic..'9 12/(),f, i;ee lira:> ~-44 5 115 15.7 105 92 (90) SC a;. •• rj 4:0 12/04 SEE lll~p 238 JC' ll5 14.9 104 91 (90} NU ., 431 12/04 l?ee aiap . 239 5 115 13.7 104 .9l. (90) NU 'i32 12/04 see ~ap f35 5 .115 14.5 · 105. •. 92 · (90} '. Nu·. .. I .433 12/0\ 5 115 . 15.3 104 91 (9(1}·' : NU see map 230 ,.J 43-4 12/0lt see 111ap. 23~ 5 115 15.2 105 ~2 (90) SC I J . 435 !2/C~ see maD 240 5 '. C' 16.1 1(14 91 (9(1} NU •!.J 436 12/05 see maµ 263 ., 115 13.2 105 92 (90) N'J ., 437 .12/05 see r.ap 265 5 .. 115 12. 9 1(17 .. 93 (90) NU 43.ff 12/CS .. see a:ap · 241: ·t-115 15.~ 10.; 9j. (90)· · . NU . .., ·r .. ... . . 43'.7· lf!iC.'5 · · Eee .r.1a;r · 2&i· :5 HS 13.5·-1ti7. 94 .• .. {SCIJ : •· ·. SC . ... . . : : .. . . . . .. _. ·.· ' . . . . .. J ~ Legend; (II) =-Required Peri:er.i Cou:pactiCl'.I, R-#. = Retested on Test ii, SC=Sand Corie, NU=Nuclear, DC=Drive Cy!., OT=Other. J: ,. -Pr~ect Name: AI~ilORT BUSINESS CE:{;'ER: U~ffi 2 J ) J I l I ,. 1 l ! J. -1. J. l J J .J . .. ... . J . . . J . l ·-~ -... i1:st Test ~uro~ef' Date 1589 J,ft(J 12/06 44! 12/06 -4'i2 12/0i 4-43 12i06 +44 12/(J6 Test Locatlor, see. aap see aiap see 111ap see •1ap see 11ap 445 12/06 see map 446 12/08 see map 447 12/08 see map ~48 12/08 see map 449 12/08 see map 12/08 12/(>8 f2/1C: see aap see raap see !llap .450 451 452 45J 454 12/12 · see map 46(1 4U 462 I ~S3 464 12/12 1Vl3 12/13 12/0i 12/07 12/13. 12/13 12/13 12/14 12/l't 12/e.Q 12/20 12/20 iZ/~: 12/21 12/21 12/21 12/22 liiF: ~12/~- 473°' .·1E:I~ 4-,: ,.., !2/22 see saap see map see liap see ?JJa!) • see map see 11a? see a1ap see 1tap 5ee raao see n1aµ see sap see 111a11 see JSa? see !!ap see i:ii?!l see 111ap s.ee map 5Ee ~~·p· ' s~c: aati·· .. 5ee map see roa;> see Map r' .... , Ele'lat 1or, or Deptn (fe1:t i 24& 286: 276 276 236 .240 235 22.7 2.1.l 269 281 25~ 274 . ) • . · .. 260. .. . .. . • .. ;. . . : Field Density Test Results Curve ~::,. & l'ia>1i~hl Dry DrmsHy Cpcf> ---~----5 5 5 5 5 5 ::, C" J 5 5 5 C" ., s 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 13 . ii· i3. · 13 r ..:. s .. .... .. .., •• r:: •• J 115 llS 115 HS :15 115 115 115 115 •• C" UJ 115 115 l15 H5 115 us 115 115 115 115 115 115 115 1~1 rn .J~1 ! lli 115 ~H Hl _ ,.,5 . 4:.~ 4• !15 ... : .. -· ·1 ru. Mt-)sture COflter,t {percer,t} 13.3 15. 7 ri4o· !4.1 15.0 13.6 12.S 13.5 1-4.4 12.8 le ':r .; ... 1'1.8 . ., -.1..:.b 13.9 14.3 12.4 12.7 1'1.0 .13. 7 17.9 l't.6 15.9 16.2 1--.J •. / le?. 8 12.6 12.5 13.2 17.S 14.S l 't, ': 18. 9 ~· .Z0.5 17.E:· . '. l-'t. 6 21.4 19.f lE.7 Fill Dry. l}er:s1ty Cpcfl 107 104 105 105 103 107 103 1(18 1(15 110 1(15 10'1 108 107 107 1(18 103 1(15 -i05 105 107 105 105 !1)5. 10~ 107 99 !05 108 105 1(14 • J.04 .. '104 , • fiel,;tive Compaci.ior. (percent) 93 '31 9~ q::, ... nr: ,., '34 92 % S! 94 93 94 Sl . 54 '3~ 92 92 · 92 ;g 91 9:i 95 94 SI . '3_1. .• .. RE:marks (see leger1ol <S(1) {90) i90} ('3(/j {9(1) (9(,) 190) (90} (90) (90) (9(1) {'30} (90) ('30} (90) (90) (9(1) (90) {9(1) ('30} (90) ('3(1) (90i 190) (90! \9(r} (90) ('30) (90i !SO} (9(i) tSOl ' <9v> · (9(>j {90} {5(1} (90j . (9"(:; SC NU Nil NU Nl.l NJ N:J · NU NU NU t{'J l\'U NLl NU NU Nu NU NU SC SC SC SC SC NU NU N:.! l\!Li NU Ni! N!J NU ,Kµ, NU. NJ ~LJ N!J SC .s~ J .. Renar'ks Legend; II!) = Rsqui1"ed Percer,t ~action, R-# = lietested ~-n iest H, -SC=Sand. Cor.1e, NU=Nuclear, DC=i•rive tyl., OT=Other ·~ . ,,; , . .. . J:, l, -".-:-.·e·· ,. ;::1~;.:j;:· ;,.Ja::,ts~ cr;~iEr!? ;;!\!! .: r. \:.J ~-l\i:.~r:: ::;_2:.:: .:: Pa3e rr iJ ' Field Der,sity Test Results £1 e·.-a; .c•r, Curve r,;:;,. -. , .. ~l:! Fill l ·1e~t T~!:t 7E~~ c,r !-1"!;a;,il~U11! :r:01stl,rE Dry R2!.=.tiYe .r,UJ1b!r Dci!e ;..C•:at 1cm D~;!th r,ry !}ensi ;y r,:-r.tei'lt Density [c,miactic-ri Hemarks l~BS {feet) (prf} ipe!'Cl:(:t) •pcf) {;:erce,r,ti <see legersd) ------------------------------- .iiSv !2/F, fee-;;a:. 240 s 1 '.,. H.1 1(14 91 (90) Nu .J lf8! 12il~ L.:,~ot ?c·rr !!ru:sval lc..~l e z::: 5 115 15. 7 1(15 '32 i90J SC '!ix' !2ii~ !:E& cc~ (:5(: .. I lS ~E.. ~ 1(13 so (90} NU ,J 't83 .i2i1~ se: r,a::, ?-..,. ~ ..C'. !S.Z Iv'+ 91 (9(1) sr; ...... J.J.J .;a.:i 12/!!: see ~c.: 262 5 H5 15. 0 10'1 '31 ('30} NU ~5 1"'··~-Sfi? t12:? c:83 ·'I 115 17.5 105 ·31 (90) SC .:./a.b 'i66 1~26 see Illa? 26'f E, 114 18.3 l (ii; 92 (90) NU 487 12/25 see ma~ 27(1 13 111 !9.1 1(•2 92 (90) NU \ 488 12/26 see t;ap ... .,,. ·it ll& 1g.s }(15 91 (90) NU C1w '189 12i27 se? »a;r 2.78 6 1.4 18.3 ;03 • 91 (90) SC ',90 12./27 see ca;; ~":0 6 114 17.6 103 9, (90) NU 491 12127 see ~:iif! 23.<; 13 111 n.1 1•)2 ,.,-(90) NU • .!I 492 12/27 ~~E tF.i~ e5't 6 114 14,7 105 92 (90l SC l 493 12/27 se;: ma~ '-"56 f, 114 !3.5 103 91 i9(>) NU 494 12/27 Si?E Llcj2 258 6 Jl4 15.3 104 92 (90) NU 495 !2/26 see ilic? 255 6 1H 15. 0 104 92 (90} SC _I· 45'6 !2/26 see t:al! 288 13 111 17. l. 1(12 92 (90) N'U 1.97 12/28 see wao 285 13 1!1 .. .,. 105 95 (90) l-lU ,:.~ • ._I -.~4 12/28 298 13 111 17. 4 102 9~, (90} NU .:, .. see £ii!:! ,:. I 499 12/28 52~ l!l=;? 29'3 6 1.i4 17.9 103 90 {90) N'J 500 12/f'B s~e-i.::a~ "i!.97 6 114 15. 3 104 91 (90} SC !-0! 12/~3 see lli::fl 260 b !14 ,r -1(>3 51 (90) NU I !.J• I ~(12 12/29 see 5;c.µ 262 13 111 18,S .102 93 (90} SC !Y.•3 12/25 se~ ~o 2~ 6 114 15.6 !04 91 (90) NU. 504 1.:12s see e.aµ 263 6 114 15.6' 104 92 (90} Ntl 1 505 12/2': see r.ao 264 6 11'! 15. l 10.'.i 91 (90) NU 1990 · ~,(16 (11/03 SE!: t;a;1 289 13 lll 18,3 !OJ 94 (9(1i SC 51)7 C,l/03 s~e !la~ 265 13 111 18. 7 102 r ('30) NU a:. J 503 'Jl./03 see-·u::.:: 26& 13 111 19.1 1c,2 93 [90} NU 509 Ol/03 see ~0;1 ,66 13 111 17.6 102 ,:;•, (9(1} NU .,c., 510 Oif.(13 •· see me:> f:67 13 111 lij. 9. ~01 92 (90) NU ., j 5a 0l/(1~ see "i!P 299' 13 111 17.2 _lo2 93 (90} -NL! 5jl· Ol/04 sea ~;a;:; 300 5 115 !6.9 !.(15 -2 {9(1) SC 513 01/0'i see :.;at 301 13 111 17.3 101 92 {90} SC I 51'4 01/(14 see ~iio 299 13 111 18.5 103 93 (90) NU 515 01/04 see Ilia;; 30~ 13 111 18.3 103 93 (90) NU .. ]:-· 516 01/(!4' ·see r,1:~ 301 13 ,!ll, ·, 19: (i 10() 91 (9(1j NU S17' • 0iil)5 . 293 .. 5 ;1l5 . · . J7.e-1(14· 91 · '(90) . NU .. _. ~ee-i::a:1 : -·· 51-!! · cri1re gij, {!30>' sc::. ·. see:_.1aµ, ioo: 5 .. · 115 ··~.18.2. · .. 1~3 ... . .. . .. J Btll!ltkl ~tRm!I C~I> = P.equire-:i Percent c,~'!!pactior,1 R-ff = Retested on Test ·n, SC=Sariti Cc-rt!:, NU=Nuc:lea1·, DC=Drive Cyl., OT=Ot:-ier J ' l 1. J J. J I i J J Te~: ~111ijt,er Test (,ate ie:t ;_c,ci!.t 11:'l -i J I l ~ ·! f I ·. . . .... r, .. .JC. 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 535 537 538 539 ~'· -·· ~. 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 J •'. . ; 549 550 551 · r ·552 553 ---· Ol/05 Ol/(.,S (;j/(15 01/05 (11/0~ 01/08 01/00 (11/(18 Ol/08 (11/08 01/0S 01/05 01/03 01/0'3 01/09 01/09 01/09 01/09 01/09 01/0-3 (11/10 01/10 01/10 01/10 01/10 01/10 01/10 01/11 01/11 01/11 see "i!l) si:e a1ao see t1a~ see lli&p see 111ap see i:.ap see map see r.ia? see roap see map see ;nap see 11ap see .11ap see 1oap see rsar, see 11t1p see map see ;sap see n:ap see 11aµ see IGcp see. Eci? see lli!p see 11ap see tiap see .11ap see aiap see r;ap see map 01/11 see _.11ap 01n1 ·.see· 11ap 01-fil. ~ ;ee-1Gap· . 01111 · ~ee · map 01/11 see 1ap see lo'lap see 1ap J 554 01/11 ~5 01/12 . . 556-. 01fl2-.. • see_aap ~ J' . · , .. -~-· 01112· .. see 11ap .. · ·ass . ',01/12 :· se~ r,ap .... . ~ ... . . , . ;. . . . . . . ·· .. · .. . . ... ·, Field Density Test Results D~;i;h (fEfti j(lv 3iJi j(l3 307 309 · 300 30-\ 305 Jil 310 305 307 248 240 -309 Cutve He•. , lr.axi"w' Dr}'. Density <.-cfi 5 1!5 13 111 13 111 6 114 & 114 6 114 6 114 5 115 5 115 5 5 5 5 5 s 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 5 115 115 115 115 115- 115 115 115 115 115 115 !15 115 114 115 115· 115 115 11~ 114 -257,. · '13, 115- HS· lll .. 11i· 111 -·254 256 . .13' · 13 fill ~~ist•Jre Conier,t.. ~oerc1mt) 16..6 1!:.5 2(:,0 18.9 17.9 16.7 17,5 16.7 16.0 l!U 16.5 15.8 15.9 15. 8· 14.0 15.8' 16.9 18.0 16.7 17.3 18.1 13,1 i4.0 13,l 13.1 12.1 13.S H,Z 15.7 .16. 7 17.8 ·1s.1 t6.7 16. r · 17. 7 313 5 115 14.2 314· · 1 116 16.3 'j(JS 4 116 17 •. 3. 315 : · ·4 , 116 • :• 16. i.: , ·. j(,5·· ··-.i3 ·· .. n1. ..iz:~ .. -·. Fili Dry Dem~lty (pcfl 1(16 .102 103 103 103 104 108 105 105 104 106 104 105 101 103 104 J(l5 104 103 103 103 103 1o; . 103 105 10-\ 103 106 1.08 iQl 102· 102 106 106 105 1o·r · Page i! i4 Relative Cc,nipact ion (percer,tl 92 92 S2 92. r..? ., .. 91 90 90 90 95 92 92 91 93 91 92 91 90 -~1 9.:! . 91 90 90 91 90 91 90 '31 91 91 94 · 93 .. ,92"· .. 92 92 92 91 92 ·92. nemarks (see ieger,dl: (901 SC i90J NU (90i Ni.i !90} NU <90} SC (90) SC (90) SC (90) NLI (90) NU (90) NU (90) (9(1) (90) {9(1) (90) (90) (90) • (9(1) (90) (90) (90) (9(1) (9.0) (90) (9(1) (90) (90} (90) (90) (9(1) (90) (9Q) <,SQ) (90) (90) (90) (90) (90) (90) (90) ·: .-• ·. SC SC SC NU N;J NU ·NU 1''U NU .NU SC . NU Nu N!J NtJ NU SC SC SC NU SC SC ru .. NU . NU NU SC SC N'J, NU , . l ., }. Praject Name: lURPORi BUSINESS CENTER. u.~n 2 . .. . TABLE 2 Page# lS ' Field Density Test Reaults Elevation Curve No. Fill Fill J TEist Test Test e:r & Jf,axi111w, Moisture Dry Relative Number .Date Le-cation Depth Dry Der,sity Col'lt1mt Density Corapac:-t ior, Remarks 1990 (feet) (p::f} .(percent) (pcf) (percent) !see legend) 1 --------- 559 01/lZ see sap 256 13 111 15.7 102 92 (90) Nli 560 01/12 see 14ap 256 13 111 16.1 1(12 92 (90) NU 1 561 01/12 see ~i,;:; 2~9 13 111 15.1 101 92 (90) NU 552 01/lc'. see 111aj) 309 6 114 1i.2 104 91 (90} NU 563 (11/12 see ma? 311 6 114 16.0 104 Q'j 190) NU JL.. I 554 01/12 see a:ap 310 6 114 17.8 104 92 · (90) SC 565 01/22 see 11~p 262 13 111 18.5 100 91 (90} N'J 566 01/22 see 11ap 2"'..i6 13 111 17.6 101 91 (90) NU l 567 01/22 see 14ap 259 13 111 16.4 101 92 (90) NU 568 01/f;Z see 11ap 259 13 111 17.7 102 92 (90) SC 569 01/23 SEE MAP 261 3 113 17.1 102 91 (90) Nu 570 01/23 SEE l".AP 264 3 !13 18. 7 103 '31 (90) NU 571 01/23 SEE MAP 263 13 111 19.5 101 91 (90) NU J 572 01/23 SEE MAP 266 3 113 17.0 104 S-2 (90} NU 573 01/23 SEE MHP 267 13 H1 17. 9 103 93 190} t,;1J 57.\ 01/23 SEE MAP 266 13 111 18.1 101 92 (90) SC _I 575 01/23 SEE MAP 269 13 111 19~ 1 103 93 (90) SC 516 01/23 SEE /'!AP 268 13 111 18.0 101 92 ('30) NU · 577 0!/23 SEE MAP 2~9 13 111 19.5 99 90 (90) NU l 570 01/23 SEE W!P 271 13 111 18.4 100 '30 i'3(1) NU 579 01/23 SEE lt'iP 272 13 111 19.3 100· 91 (90) N'i./ J 590 01/23 SEE MAP 273 13 111 19.5 100 91 (90} SC 581 Ol/23 SEE J(JIP 275 13 111 1r-:, 103 S3 CSO) 1··· "'•'-,u 582 01/2~ SEE MP.P. 277 13 l.!1 !7.9 102 92 (90) N!J 583 01123 SEE JiiP.P 2i9 6 ;14 17.5 l04 92 (90) SC J 584 (11/23 SEE r.A? 28! 6 114 15.t> 194 92 (90) NU 585 Ol/2~ SEE r.m, 280 13 111 17.8 lOJ 93 (91)} SC I 5"85 (:1/24 SEE MAP 252 6 114 ,A,~ 104 91 (90) ;~~I I . ~~ '- ' ss; 01/2~ SEE ~P C53 n1 •I: 7 10c 4-(~(I) ~,1J •J· t J., J 588 (1!/~4 SEE rim1 2C5 13 111 !6.4 101 sz (9(1) !{' .... t ..-AQ 01/24 SEE Ji!HD 256 il 111 17.5 lOZ 9"2 {'?Oi Jo;• Jw • t\., . .L 590 0112; SEE .f,t;'.iP ·-zi54· 13 111 . 16. l . !02 :~. {90) Nil . t-q, : 01/f:'F SEE-t-!fi.J 265. . 13. 111. 16:i 1oi· . '3'1 . ("9!-j) ... , .i •• . ~ . j 592 01/24 · SEE l"~P 284 '!3-... !7.5 1(1.2 92 _{90) t'., .u .. ,~, ! 593 C1/24 SEE r.AP 288 13 1 •• 18.·5 lOf! 92 (90) s: ... ~ j .!! J 594 01/25 SE~ MAP 285 · 13 Hl 18.3 101 q:; (9(1) MJ ~ ... 595 01/25 SEE MAP 2&9 116 15.6 107 93 19vl s-4 J 596 01/25 s~ r.:ii> 288 4 !lb ~7.4 1(14 90 (9(1) t,U ·1 597. · (11/25 • SEE 1'1..:i? •· . . E7£ ~ . -113. . •. 16.4 10q 91 • (.fll)} : SC . 598 . ·oi12:i" ·s5: r.AP . . 272 ,.. . !l~-·11. 7 1QS:· · S1·<· {'3(1) ~J· .... . . " . . ,. . • .. . .. ... · . .. • . .. · . . Bn,m:~i L~Hnd I {ff) =. Ret;u1red Per~erit Co111paction1 R-#1 = Retested c,n Test ti~~ SC=Sand Cone, NU=Nucleari DC=Drive Cyl. 1 (!T=~ther 1 -~ ' •. ·--Pi"(tJf:Ct N.;..e: A!RPORT BiiSINESS CEt~TEfi, W~IT 2 , .. ..... . ·r;i~E 2 Pagel; 16 1 Field Density Test Results L l Elevation. Curve 1-<o. Fill f'P 1 •• -:-e~t Test Test or ~ /f,ar. l lrlUI~ r<oisture Dry Relative N~1Aoer Date Location Deµtt, Dry Der,&ity Cor,terit Density Compact i c,r, Rer~arks 1990 (feet> ipcf) lp1:rc1mt} (pd) Cpei·cerit;) (see legend)~ ] ----599 o· ,,:,r SEE l'iAP 28(1 6 l l'f 19, 9 104 91 (90) t-.'1 '' '-"' t>OO 01/25 SEE MAP 28-:) 6 114 !6,(; 1(15 92 (90} -~· .~., 60! 0:125 SEE KAI: C7S 6 !14 .--105 92 (90i !f.J j .al.~ 602 01/25 S~E /1'.A? 281 6 111; 19, 7 104 92 (90i f,!;J 603 01/25 .SEE r.AP Jj1 6 114 .-1 104 Jj:l, (9(1} r,v ~I•• .,_ I 604 01/26 SEE MAP 283 3 113 15.0 103 92 (9(1) SC 605 01/26 SEE i'IAP 264 3 H3 16, 7 100 B9 (9(1) 606 ~"J 605 01/26 SEE MAP 284 3 113 15.9 1(>2 91 (90) t.1J 1 607 01/26 SEE MAP 313 3 11J 14.7 104 93 (90) NU 608 01/26 SEE .MAP 286 3 113 17.4 103 '32 (90) ,f,.IJJ • I 6(19 ()1/26 SEE AAD ws 3 113 17. 9 103 92 (90) SC 610 01/26 SEE MAP 288 3 113 16.9 103 Sl (90) NU -6U 01/26 SEE NAP 265 3 113 16,5 105 94 (90} Nu 6'~ 01/26 SEE WlP 279 3 113 17. l 1(12 91 (90) N'J ' ... 6{3 Oli26 SEE r.AP .. 260 3 113 16.5 103 ·92 (90) S!: 614 01/29 SEE NAP 250 5 115 14.5 107 93 (9(1) N'J ! 615 01/29 SEE MAP. 263 3 113 16.5 1(12 sq (90) N'J 616 01/29 SEE MAP 280 3 113 16.1 103 · 91 {90) NU -~-617 Ol/29 SEE XAP 273 5 .. ,,. 18. 7 104 91 (90} SC U.J J. 6!8 01/29 SEE ~i> .. 311; 6 11-4 17.5 103 91 {90} SC 619 01/29 SEE MAP 312 6 114 16,2 103 91 (90} N'J I 620 0!/23 .SEE MAP 312 13 111 17,B 102 '33 !90) Nu 621 01/30 SEE Mil JjO ,: ll5 15.S 104 91 (90} SC ,J 622 (t!/3~ SEE MAP 311 5 ;!S 15.5 106 92 (90} ·NU . 623 01/30 SEE YiAP 313 5 115 15,3 104 90 ('30) N'' · ~ ~ 624 01/30 SEE NAP 312 .5 HS 17.(1 105 92 (90) NU • 625 01/30 SEE ·MAP ':'-1• .,. 115 15.4 103 90 (':iOl Ni! ..... i ... 1 626 (11/30 SEE l".AP J!• s 115 15.3 l04 9() (9{1) .KU .i 627 01/30 SEE MAP :m 5 1 .. ,.. 16,J 104 91 <SOi SC ~ ·~· 628 02/01 ·SEE MAP ~5 13 ... J8.5 ;02 92 (90) SC .:.,~ J. .629 ~og/0-1 SEE l'iA13 294 13 ill 18. 2 102 C':i {90) N~ .... ~'0-02/01 SEE NAP ~7 13 !11 · 16.4 102 '32 (90) NU . ·=. ~~ -~J •. 531 -(;2/01 • SEE MAP .. 13 :11. .. lS.S-10J . ''32 . (S-0) . . . .. f SEE° l'!P.~ .. .... -r. ·02.101 292 .. 3 · !I3 17.& ,.. .. :, '· 90· .. -(90) . . f\lij.··. ~: . t>J~ ,. .V&.. : 633 wo1· SEE .Jrl.fiP 293 3 , t-. 18.0 -10:=! '31 (9!)}. NiJ .. .) J 634 02/01 SEE Jl'.AP ,q• 3 113 .i7. 0 1(14 '32 {'3(1) Nli ..... o 635 02/01 SEE .Ktli: Z9S 3 !13 16. i :03 S2 (90) SC .Jil5 OVO! SE~ ]"i!P· Z.S7 _7 i!3 ,17.9 1(12 91 ('.10) N~ ., .. ' _Gii·. 02i0~. SEE ·~:::}P .• z4a .. .,. 1.tC Fi;o-105, ?2-<SOJ .. t.f' ,J .,.,.,, , ., . .. . J· . . ' t,'U •• ~ . -~3if "(12/03 SEE. riAP . -~ES 5· ... r:. ;~:~ ~OS 9-4 {SC:}-.. ~~J. . . · ·-.... • ··.· .. ... •. ' . . . . .. . ·.·· . . . . .. ..• -~-... : •.· ' .. ; . . .. ·-~ . . . . :• : J He11arks Legend, . ,~, = Required Percept Cc,spoeti or1, lHi~ = ·neteste:i or, Test #i, S.C=Sana Cone, NU=Nuclear, ilC=-Driv& Cyl,, OT=Other l .. ' "Pt"CJJECt Naue: AiH?CRT BUSINESS CE~'TER, t.mT i r?;P-!.£ 2 Dage t, 17 l Field .Density Test Results ... ~. Curve t"'· Fill Fill 1 1:.1.eva.li:m Test Test Te5-t or t ~iisxir-1ut; t~oi5t1.ire Dry Relative Nu111ber Date Location D~pt!i Dry r:1e:-:sity Cor,tent [tensity Cc,;ap~:-t iw, Remar1<s 199(1 (feet; icd) iper::er,~i (pcfl <percent> t!:EE legencl. : 1 --------- 63S Oi?/v5 SEE >:AP 267 ~ ,:3 l&.5 102 91 CSOJ NU 640 02/(15 SEE. 1ri,qp 267 3 ··-15.6 103 q, (9(1) r,t.! J. :..J -· j 6'il c,2,os SEE MAP 268 "" . "" l-'i. 5 105 92 (90i ):H ., ,. ...... :,-. 64? 02/05 SEE Y.A? 28'3 5 ••r: 1a.c, 1(14 91 (90} },Ill .. .J..: .,u 6'tJ 02/05 SEE YiAP 269 C 115 14.6 105 91 (90) m1 ., j GH 02/05 S~ MAP 230 5 • •r 18.2 104 91 (9(1} 'f' .. J.., :>- 645 02/0& SEE r.AP 268 3 i.13 !5.4 103 9~ 19(1) Ki 645 02/06 SEE JIIAP 2i1 3 ,,-r· '7 104 9"2 (90) NtJ __ .) b., 617 02/06 SEE MAP 292 3 113 1&. 0 103 91 190) NU 648 02/06 SEE MAP 272. 3 .,-1£. 5 10.; 93 (90) NU ! .. .) 649 02/05 SEE .KAP 2i4 3 !13 18.0 102 90. (90} ND 6~0 02/06 SEE MAP 27B 6 114 !S. 9 10'! 92 (9(1} NU 651 02/06 SEE MAP 272 6 114 16.1 104 92 (90} t~U J 652 02/06 SEE MAP 294 6 lJ4 18.0 105 94 · (9(1) SC 653 02/06 SE£ .MAP 2.74 3 113 19.3 102 91 (90) M.i 654 02/(15 SEE MAP 272 3 !13 16.5 102 91 (90) NU _1 ~ss 02/07 SEE NHP 277 4 !16 17.0 107 93 (90) SC 6~6 02/(17 SEE MAP 264 4 •I • 17.5 107 93 (90) N•I •• b . ~ 657 02/07 SEE MAI? 266 3 !13 iB.3 103· 91 (90) · N:J } 656 02/07 ... SEE l".AP 280 : 3 1 i.:, i9.5 103 c• (90) NU ., . . 659 02/07 SEE r;;P 281 3 .,-•::: '=i. 104 CJ-2 (90} c-~ ; .-:. •.s-.,, wW. J 660 (12(0i SEE MAP 295 4 116 · 17.1 106 92 (90) NJ 6l:.' 02/(17 SEE MAP 274 3 :,!3 18. 9 l!J4 92 {90) ~J w1 662 0:./07. SEE !>iA;l 2i6 -~11 !S.6 103 · 91 (9(1} N;J 66.3. 02/07 SEE /1:A? 283 .. 113 ,= -~ ·103 0""• (90) N" ,l ,..: ... .,c. '..: J 654 02/07 SEE MAP 279 2 . ,-15,6 104 •• Q•;; (9(1) SC :.~J .,.., l:fS 02/03 SEE XAP 265 3 .. -17. 7 i~ 9+ . (90} N:J ... .) 656 C2i08 S=E !"i,q;l 254 . i1~ • :: i,. l03 '3s! rno; SC . .... 657 0210a SEE !':AP 2% 13 tl: ,-. 10~ 91 (90) Ml .6 ,. 'I GSB 02:/08 SEE MAP 3(1(1 ,-111 1 • . !(11 91 (9(1) )1t-.~ c. 'f '''"' i l 66~ 02i08 SEMA.'1 E.67 ,.,: . .,. . lO't 91 ('30i s: . ;j ,! ..... i..,. ' 670 02/{JS SEE ~.AP 251 5 l." :5.2 106 92 (90) N!J l ·-. 02/0B . ..... (~I)} N".J 671 .StE YAP 2ES . .,. • •r: 15-. 3 -11)~ Jl ,J t'~ i f:iE". 02:i98 SE='. /f/ii' 21H": r. ,.~= ;~. 0. !OS ;'32 (9(1) . . r~~ ., •• .J .. !J 60:":' 02/CS SEE !1',AP Z7S ,: • tr-l't. s :°07 94 (90} C·'" ,.: ., J._;.-~ WW l ·-i. (12/08 Si:E ~AP 271 5 i_.!5 r ~ 104 91 (90) "I'' t:J/. o.-. ., --.. 02/(t8 SEE; KAP 286 5 t•C 17,?. 105 92 (90) SC b/.J a..1..: L b/~ 02/0'a S£E" ~;;:i;, 21; 5 ,4·t'""' IC" • 104 91 i90} NU .. •!~. "..,,. l. . , 'fl7 o&os· S-:.~ ~fiP· £87.-:, ·l i~5 .. . -.,. . !-05 .S2 (9(1i u: -J ·. . · .. ~ ""!· •I .. "" ;-....: .. 6iB (:2,f,;'3 SE.£: riHP ~ . 2Sf ; · · _1!5 ,, -=. 106 . .·12 (SOl .... -s: .. .: . -.,,,,,.; : I .. · .. ·· ~ : .• .. . · . ... · .. . . :- ,J Btaiarss J,.eggr~t" mu = Re~uirea Percerit Cc,apacti,:,r,1 R-:-~ = Ret.!:.'ste::: ,:,I': Tes! ;if, SC=Sar,d Cc-Te, NU=Nuclear, DC=Drive Cy!.-, OT=Other ) j J J ] J l J _j I I .. l·'·_ • • -~ J.. Ii . ·]··. . .. , ... ·. 1-· •.. , ,· Test Tr:st Numlir:r ~ .. te !9~0 57'.1 02/09 6B(I 02/ ;,'9 681 1)2/(!~ 682 (121(.1'3 683 02/lE: 6M 02i12 68~ 02/12 686 (12/12 687 02/12 688. 02/13 689 02/1:i 690 02/13 691 02/13 692 02/13 693 0211i 69.lt 02/13 695 02/H 6'36 02/1.ft 6'37 02/14 698 02/ll; 699 C2/14 iOO Of:/!~ 101 02n4- 102 02/!S- 703 . OZi!S 704 02/lS 705 02/15 706 ('2/!5 707 02/15 708 02/15 Test Locatic,n s~ 1".AP SEE raAP SEE NAP SEE MAP SEE If.AP SEE r~P S££ ff.AP SEE MAP SEE MAP SEE l".AP SEE MAP SEE MAP SEE MAP. SEE MAP SEE r.QP SEE riP.P SEE M>!P SEE MP.P SEE KAP SEE KA~ SEE rl!P SEE Y.P.P Stt >-.AP SEE KAP SEE MAP SE YilJl SEE. 1llil SEE i'IAP SE~ t-lAP 10s 0211s . SEE r~ 710· ('2/21 5~ KqP . · ·1l1 0212i ••. SEE _MAP i12 (12i21 . . S~E ~A~- 713 ·02/2! ser: MAP . 715 02121 (t!/21 SEE MAP SEE XAP 716 · C2l2l ·sEE Mf..lP · 717 .' 02:i": SEE I!'~? •. -:ts·. ,··-:i1't"""=" . ~.S~-~ ,,,. __ .... n .... ,.. ·.,v~.;.. __ r.u- • .. ! .... , .. • .. .· Elev .. tion c,r Depth \feet} ' 247 251 251 :?48 247 303 243 247 305 248 251' 256 i52 .244 247 250 2,554 260 : ?62 • • 261 : ... ?C'." ,.bt) 268 ZiO .ei2 -~22 · 2"29 TP.B:..E. 2 Fi~ld Density Test Result, Ci:rve rn:.. F' 1 ! 1 & 1'ia;;i1vwt :r,,,is,ure Dry Dc·~sity '.::orir.ent <pd) tµerc:er,t; C' ,J 5 5 5 ,: . ,J s s 5 3 3 5 5 5 3 $ 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 5 5 C' .., 3 115 115 1.15 115 115 ll5 1:15 113 113 115 115 115 113 115 1 f C' J.J 114 1Ft 11-4 H-4 114 1:•1,. .l. lilt l!'t 118 !18 115 !15 115 113 ;3 113 3 H3 s .... 113· 3 3 3 ':· .., 5 5 5- 113 -113 113 .. ll5 14,j l~.8 16.2 15,6 17.7 15.5 16, 6 17. 9 16.7 14.3 15.6 15.0 15.3 16. 9 15.G 17.0 !7.2 16.3 16.1 16.7 !~.7 17. l 17.9 16.S 15.1 · 16. 7 !7.6 Ib.2 17. 1 !5.8 18.9 13.5 1a.1 1'3.5 16.3 17. '3 16. 3 . ·.17.8 -. .... ... ··. c·, 1 • Lt. Dry (pcf} lOt) 105 10'1 1(13 106 1(14 102 103 104 105 104 103 104 104 10.lt !04 104 103 104 106 105 lOS 104 !04 !05 103 1oz. 102 -!·:Oi~ 1v2 1(13 103 !{J5 :105 . : !~~- Helative Cor~i::ac:tic•n ! 9erc:er,t i Reinarks (!:>eE ie~er,di"' 9~ :90} NU r,u 67 19()) 682 K.! 92 i'30) ';il (90} 90 i90l '32 (90) 91 {90} 91 (90) 91 (90) 91 (9{)} 91 (9(1) . 91. (90) 9'2 {9(1) 90 (90} 91 (90} 91 (90) 91 (90} 92 '(9(1) 91 (90) . 91 (90) 93 (9(t) S2 (9(1: 92 (9(1) 92 (90} 92 (9(1) '31 (9'.j) 91 (9()) 91 (90! 91 (90) 91 ,91 91 ···.5(1 ·91 (90) (90} 190). (96f -.11'3 (90) (90) (9ij) ' (9(1) ' (90} . ~ ". N'i.l SC NU Nil NU SC NU NLI SC NU NU SC NU ~'U SC NU NU NU , SC NU N:J NU t.'U Ml Nt! SC SC NU N't.l N'J NU NU SC SC Nil ·92 91 92 , 92 94. (901 :. .. Nll · · .·: ·· .. . Bmrks Legerid: mn = Reouired i?er:::er1t. Cot~pi1ction1 R-f.i =· Rete-?ted cm Test. f~1 S!:=Sar1tl C.or:=, NU=:-iuclear, DC=Drive Cyi. 1 OT=Other ..... . . ·: .• . . . . POOR QUALITY ORIGINAL S l -· . . .l ·J ' ~ -l ' 1 1 J __ J r. ]·-,. .. .. _ ...... 1 j ·. ·.r . ,·. ) 1 L. ) ·. J 1.· •} -·liroJe::t r,ame: IURPORT BUSINES'S CENTER~ UNIT 2 Test Nu1'bei" ----719. 72(; 721 7~2 723 724 i25 726 727 728 "f/14 745 746 747 ··11ta Test Test Dete location 1'39'•) 02/22 SEE r,m; 02/22 SEE MAP 02/22 SEE MAP 02/~ SEE 11'.AP 02/23 SEE MAP (12/23 SEE MAP 02/23 SEE.MAP 02/23 ·SEI; MAP 02/23 SEE KAP OZ/23 SEE MAP. . -•. _ .. _._ .. _. ~--~ :i:.·· !···.· .... ·. • ... ~. 02./27 · .. :sEE MAP ·,. 02/27 · SEE. NAP , 02/27 : SEE. MAP 02/27· . SEE._ MAP 02/27 SEE !l'oAP ·749 0?./27 SE;.HAP • "F.,O 02/2,1, · ·. SEE liAP · 751· 02/27 .. _SEE.MAP ., 75Z. oaf~ · SEE' MAP • 753 p21~~ ·--~~. Mf P 754 755 756 757 ·:1ss ' 02/2.7" ~EE MAP · . :· 02/27 SEE MAP 02128. SEE r.AP . . . . . 02/28. • s~E' MAP . C'2fa8 · SEE ~P : . ... . Field Density Test Results Elevat ior, c,r Depth (feet) Curve Ne,. Fill Mo::.sture Conten; {;1ercer,ti Fill &, Miiil i IA•Jll ~ry Density (pcf} Dry Density {pcfl Relative Cc,mpact i or, Reraarks {pen:er,t} (see legertd) " ---------s~ i90} t(u 3(15 6 22l-6 22', 6 c.'28 13 228 6 257 6 257 4 25g 4· 260 4 261 4 5 5 3.· 270 268 272 · 274 272 "276 278. 280. 282 28/t 286 274 276 .216 :· ,: . 281 . .6' ·6. . 4 6 4· . ·_ 6 . ·. •f 6. 6 4 4 4 .. ·5 5 . '. 6 6 4 -4 4 4 3 114 lti. 4 . 1(13 lH 15,Z · 103 · . 90 CSO) NU 114 16.4 103 91 (91)} NU 111 ·--! '. b 102 92 (90) SC 11'1 17. 4 103 91 (90} NU 114 18.5-103 91 (90). NU 116 1'3.5 107 92 (91))_ SC 116 17.5 107 93 (90)' NU 116 16.l 106 9~ (90) NU 116 16.5 105 91 . (~) NU 116 • 16.0· ·. 105···· -91 . 190) : NU 115-. 15.5 .. ·.-,: _;_.;_.t~-\-_:·'.; · .. :: 91 ,:.-.. 190t., .. :, . :i .. NU, .'_ . ·_ · · · 115:. 16.2. · .: ,· 103. :. ·. ·: .,-,90·:-;._ d90)"-·. .-· .: NU •.. :. • " .•• -:.:·}·• .: =-~;-!:! -~: ,,._ .... -•. ~-. . -.-1..,... . .• . • . • • . . ·.: · 1:14 :_. ·17.g-· :: ·:··-~ _.10~-.,\._-:"_":,.\.9! ;: .... (~(1) ·--~--. : . > Ntl · •. : ..... 114 ·' 18.4 ·.:·: .:-·wt·i:•-.:·::;·\' 91··.·: (90) ;·.·.;---~--NU·.·_-.. : ·: ;:·.,-.:: -~::t/·:':,.-~·-.. -,_r;·l--::·._.,--·.(f:·:· ,(·-:·.-·)~·-. "\ .·.-_._-... ;.>--.·., .. 11&· · · -11 o-·,.-:·,-... ·:107': __ ;.·:._.,-..• ,:::92 '·., -· cso> -·· _._ .. .-. sc:· ·:,\. ·-:· ... 116 · ·16:s./~_:.·:;,_:·.10a\·. ·.\,.:_··.93-~-.-:.:::-csoL:._.,. · .. ·:,sc.· ·· ... 116 .... 17.3.-: .. : ... , 1(15 _:,-· ... __ .:._9Ji ~ .. (90) .... ·.: .... NU , : 116. 1s~·9 . · . ··· 'ios -. . :· . 91 .. csu{ : · ?\'!J :·· •. ---113 ·.1;.2··:· . .-.:1c13:·'_;-.-·_ 9f_.····{so) ._,_:::N~ '.·· · . . . . . . :.: .,. . '. ..:.~ . ·. . . -: . . . .. . . . . . . .. : . . :l·· :·.~·_:~ . . '_; . : ,, : ... . ,-; . . . .. BR•arks Legend1 . . . ,. ··-.. °'. · · · ·: < .. Cl~) = Required Perc;nt Compactiori! R-ff = Retested on Test U; SC=Sarirl .Corie, NU--Nucl2ar; pc~Drive Cyl;, OT=Other . --~ . . . ' -; 1~ • '' -• ... ] ~--~ Nar~e: c.;rlsbad air1,1c,rt cer,tre unit ':t Pr~·ject .. TAKE 2 Page U 1 t Field Density Test Results . Elevation Curve No. Fill Fill J iest Test Test or & Nai,ci111urA Moisture Dry Relative Nu11ber Date Lc-catior, Depth Dry Det,si ty Conter.t Density Colllpactic,r: Rernarks 1~'30 (feet) (pcfl (percent) (pcf) (percent) (see leQerid) 1 786 03/05 .see 11ap 204 .. 4 116 15.6 106 92 (90) NU . ·. 787 03/08 see 11ap 206 • ; 116 16.4 106 93 (90) t.'lJ 1 788 03/08 see 11ap 206 4 116 17.l 105 91 (90} SC .l W'3 03/(19 see 111ap 210 -~ 116 16.1 105 91: ('30) SC 790 03/0'3 see 111ap 212 ·.f 116 f4.4 106 92 (90) N'tJ .. ,• .... ~ ] , ' } J e. J ·t Test 1'iuuber 825 B:::6 · 827 828 829 Test Date 1990 -·--03/17 (13/f3" 03H9 03/19 03/19 Elevation Test c,r Location ·.Depth (feet} see isap ZB3 see 11ap 240 see 11ap 242 see •ap 245 • see Map 247 1•u.1'-'-'- Fitld D1n1ity T11t R11ult1 Curve No. Fill Fill & na>tiL'IUIA Mcoi!:ture Dry Dry Density Content Density (pcfl (percer,t) <pcf> 5 115 16.0 104 5 115 16.9 104 5 115 17.6 105 5 115 15.4 103 5 115 15. 1 104 .. .., Relative Compactiori · !percent) 91 91 91 90 91 Rernarks (see' legend) (90) (9(1) (90) (90) (90) NU NU NU NU NU NU ;SC NU 1~ .J J, Test Humber 865 856 .867 858 869 870 Test Date 1990 03/28 03/29 03/2:9 03/29 03/30 03/30 ~-. Test l.ocat ion see aap see •ap see 1ap see •ap .see raap se~ ,oap ···.:· :.· TADLE 2 Page, Ii 3 Field Density Test Results Elevation Curve No. Fill Fill c,r Depth (feet) 236 236 235 253 • 234 242 228 2.20 230 234 & MaxirR® Dry Density (pcf) -----5 115 5 115 5 115 5 115 5 115 5 115 IC' 115 J 6 114 3 113 5 115 Moisture Conteri~ (percer,t) 18.2 17. 1 18.6 17.5 15.9 16.2 15.5 -17.2· 16.8 .. . _.17.4;.r/:. ,· .... . Dry Relative Der,sity Compact i or, Remar:ks (pcf> (percer,t) (see legend) 103 90 ('30) NU 1(17 93 (90) NU 106 93 (90) NU 104 91 (9(1) SC 104 91 (90) NI.I 104 9i (90) NU 105 92 (90) NU 103 91 (90} NU ·103 92 (90) NI.I 104 91 (90) NU . : :."~ -~ :,;.·· .. -.:• ... :-~ ·•·;· .. R-D = Retested ·on Test 11,·· sc=SanrLG9rie( NO=Nuclear1 DC=Drive Cy!., OT=Dther• :·-.. . .... -: .. . .. : . • "! \ . . ..... lo. H ..... -····\, t.· •• . •••• ·-~~f,1-~ ·'N_!.-.,,r.,. "., ..•..•... ,, -~~~.::. ~~ ~ . ' ..... ,· ... ,•,• •, • •I'• ·:: .. -1.-:.: •. .. . ·· · .... . ' ·• _ .. : ' • ·· :: •· ,i.·,."·'iUr .. ~o:.,:;,_: · :?::~~i,11'. . •_.:· .... -. ·. :_~;__ ·.· :.:_:.~_::_;_-~.-_'.l:l.~.~-~--,:_ •. -.:_:_~._:_i_·.t,:_!·~---~.!::·:::_[_:,:,:.~.~-~.:.·_;_:_.,'._;_:_;_~_._t_:_~.:_:;~_'..;,}_~,-.t.~_l:;_;_._:_:_\·~.:'.:-_1,·_~.~.~';_:.:.,:::·~.:_ .. :.:_{:~-~.'._;_:'.;_:_·_-.~_'._·.·_:_._:,f_:.:.:.'._,;:.~.:: •. ;_:_~,->_: :,.:_ .. · .•. ·.,. : .· . . ::::;::; J'.; ,,, '' ., .. ,, ' --~+.:;;~;~,~-~ .. ~ ,,.,. ""' .. '' ' './,,i):: ij]ti.i~i ·· .... • •.• • ,• i_ • I~: I:=~·.::·_ ... ·;: ',,;•I.-~ ..,.. : ;". • . ·.·· . .. ~ . .:.· ... . ... ·.!• ..... ,: . ·.~.\.::.~·: . .;_ .. -~: .1 il ~~,- I l I I ·1 I 1 1· ,1 .. ,1 J I l -,,. . .·· . ,· :.· .. -. ... :_ : ·,: .. : ~' •.. •, : . '! . . . ,· .-· ,. .. .. . . ,., . . I , .... · ... -~ ... :-.·-· . ·"\· ·:··_: · .... ··~.:_:_._·:_:·.::._ .. ::·.-~·:., ... ·-_ .. _. ·:·:·.';~--~·::-~··-:-~j., ~ , ... _:_:=·: .. ,; .. : :. ·_: . .-·, . /·~-;t. >-. . ,.'~;)-: .. _~; \-:/ :'._;:_::-_\:::. • .'· :-.-.-·:.... · .• ·:·: ••• ·~~i;ii}l~i.~i,:/,t:?,{::0;:\ ~i,i@t,ifi!i%lt;~1;i ::;::•. : . : . . . .:. : .. --:ittirii~1iif i( .. , 1: .... :l}..;;1.<r.·t~~'r~;~~~~~%-Jr~1(t.,;;-·,,-:--'""": ·=~~;.:.-;:_,. _;},;::: _:.;;·. \\•:.'? 1 ·-i 1:t;f$.A:f~ ;/[rw,;:~~~f¼r-i.1.-...·~ _.\,-,,·:·;. :-·.::' ._. • _;.:: • ; ,· .~ :,-;.~::~:...~;.~~~iht-l'ru{:.h;---r-\1-.: r '\ .. ~ .. 6ii~i~jl11t~1f }]f ;s~:i\[;., :J;P\· 1 /f )ii'..t _:~!{{;~{:f 4I~ii~ -~-~~it1jtr:::i:Jt{:~: ;. ···: ._ ::,. · -_-· :;·. -:'·.: .... :--fi~~\f i~!~A~:~~ti~~:i;t?P~-/: _ _ l::: .. :~~;-i!';~,)~;:'~'lit)~.W,t;::[~\t:,:~,1:~:~'~,~~:\•'· '~~·:, . .-·;--, ·.•:~:: ::)J::t,.'!1~1tl~~1fti~11fe, :iJ!~t:;:,~i·,f!!/~,~::· :.f;::,: .... :, ::• .~; · I : ·_. ...• .-:;-.·-;:, .•d:.:1;:ii(-(:.:,t,~~r~-;~~.~f:>/'j:.,,:!._;_i','·,r · r· :~ (~,~~:~~)¥1i\f f t~f f lf :~\}l~j(/?·:-=·\ :_:;:· ?;/: ... ~~f 1;~{;~~j/~~f fo?31~i¥r~jf Jitr:~t~~~ ·': ~-,:.\:· ·.·_ ·~.· · ~:~(;J/(:;i.1:;-lf ~f ~tl~~~f ff ?;(}Ki··=;~: . j ... , t.:·/.;.';~,.~·,:.·,f:,._-i;-r;,(,,'t·~·!,.-;l;·!i-,,, ... ,.,>:·'···,._.;:·, ,.;•: ·.···-'i·:• "i:·i:.=i.t.,t:.r-1.11J\i1-,"': .. rr~t .. J_!F't,{i:,:-·.-i-'-t~l'/',;-.-···--·i ·:-.:·:·. · •·. :. ,,,.. · ·p·i-:.'-',;;.'.:':;, ,-.... ';•-::-.<-¥1J",;,~·-•::.•:·. 1,:· :• ··-: ~~--P.rPJIN;t:-;.N.ue::,,~IRPORT .BUSI~SS. CS'ITRE, r.ass GMDI.r(G~~;fo:.!ii ·~ifi:~\~~ i~.~~:l, \.;;.' !•·:.::. --·~. . .·· .. · . · .= ,\ \ \ ... :.:_;~·i: .• ~\ ~·:.~,,:-v::::..~J~tM};,'tff-.t;::~.-·::'•. ,1 \~::;9;;.'..~_J}tJ}~~~)-r:_: ,._/·~-~::·-~· :.·. ·:: -·: ~-: ': .. ::' '\\~~;;;I~i~~·i\~~~i;~;,t~)~;}}};:ftf:/-/; :: .:·: . . p~-~~--\·r~;}~~:~:;j_;igN:~:(Z~i~}.\'.'· 1 ··· . r--:~<?·\ ,::::_ ,.·;::;··~.,. .. :· ·.-. . ~ ·:·-?:;f~!(~~-;,tt::~e~.\··:t~~~1~~---.::=, •.•.• -,_.. .· :. ~:.}}~:}.??:·:-~-}/:t--~·:· .. 1·· ... ··· .. ,<:':··, .-Elevatfor! .. ~-:.f.~i:-ve.:~Q~'.-~·f>'Fil~·--··. Fill._:: .. :·:·! .. ,·'·:~ _ _: •. _:::::·::, ·-··? , -.::~Test:' .. _Te~(; .. _,. ~ ~est or . _,-_& •. /'1~X~f.~Ur!l.-;,,~:,.:,··.~-?.~st.ur~_,., .• _Dry.;. Relati"'.e .'' ·. _ _. ... !,·.~·:-.·,;·:·:~/-.'--' '· ·.,. !. : ; _·.: .:._Number.'.:' Date _.. ·. ·. Locatior, .Depth . .-; .,.~n::;Der,sify}C,.Contel')t';',_ .,Der,sity .. Cornpacti9r,. ,.Rernar.ks ..• , .. ., .. , : .. : . , .... -::··. '.·1930 · .•. \. ·. :· ·. (feet)·1-:r':' (i'·:.;··~(-pc·n::f,::.-:(·~e~i:e~t>'!.·\_. (nrf} '. ·. loerceritr .· --·:.-<,s~e'·Je~e;:d)·/:·~;;:·;::.~. -.:· .. • I • ~ ~ ••• ·.••:.,;'·':,i•,.':,,,_i.,\ .. •-,,~_:\.,•'.,,,·.,.• ,.· ., •. ·,·, ,1: • •. •_,,:,,,,,i.:,.· :., . 0°• ,.·,· •. •'' • •\ • • • • (, • . .• 0 ,.... • ',•. • •,, • •• •. < . • .. ,,,·• .... :; •,,,.-,,_.::,·_,-,•:":> ~ -.·-i,, .. , .. ,',,• C ·,i •• , •' • •• •, .. "'.·, -, . ,.._~t:-t:"'?.1.:, .. _,,;~:·.,:..:,:t,-;:~,\l:}::~,.),::;::.:-..,,::•~t .. ·l_:·:·~1,.:~~-·;,,~:,~.-•,t:: .:·:·:' ' . ,. " ,-H ~---"', .. \·I,~• .... !. ~:·,_:~;~·;,)~:,:375·}~;':~,02 ·:;;· SE£ Mr,p-.. , · ;:: ·._.-· ... "'J~ 7:"~:i•;~'.';:;:!"::,.i~l117·;)/:.;:.,.£is. ,:)!,:~:i;~.·-~1,i1oa ·' .//.-::-::-:-:92 .;•:<,:.'!90i :,::;f_;:/1);,;;_,\!'N!Ji.i,;:~:;7:t;:::,.;._.: ,:·.~·.\~ .. t:···;,.. .··_:. .. ~ .. -·.·. ··1111 ··~. • . ._,: • ~_: ·:t.:.4.,_..~--~t··· · .. _ ;_{ .. ,:r;.:_.-:·.:. 0 ;, -: ·;: • •• .. :.t··. • .. ,·.~ ··-·.: -~;~.-~-· ... : ::··-,,.. i:· ._,;-:;• 'l·::?.-\'t87o';<:!F04JQ.?,,< SEE ·MP·,: ........ ·,;r;. ,,.,, .\"•, 1 :· e21:, :,-:.·4,-'¼·.:·:;::._L:-.:, 117(;M~1.-1 . .;. a-,;:-~,·.~-:-.: i 11-7.:i:•,.-'" ., ... 1(10.,,:n. · .. (91,1). ;:~;,'.;,' (;'l .. •,.,:;:,:SC~~;.;l':~<v,.'.~·I,· ~:. ~; ·fif \~~;~;;;hj~j£:r<: ::;:~,'-~:.:: .. ; · .c:·, .... • \:~;;,1jjf ~~;;i,~JJ§~;jif ~i,;;'§·::; • :> ~-: ·,:::~~f '."~;:'.~~{flfaj;,~f.ii1L i. . :· ~:;.\:J,t>.-~=-·· R~q?~r.ed~·.Pe_rcer,t Ct'1dpac~fof,, R-~.I =: Rete.~t~;.<?rj ~!~~~:~fl~;\~C;:=San£~~~~j):ll~:N_uclear.,. DC':'Drive Cy_l~/.9T~Ot~er.;_~~/?r;_;./1·/· ..!_ ~ .. ·,: -• \: .. ?,· ::,,:;'.E; \: , " . . .... :;: ·· ,·},Et{It;!N(i[If ?-i:Ell f ::::1:,:} ·-7{?L)'.{i,~i~:~1t .. i ':=:,.; ... :. ·:·-·--:,· .·~· .. · ..; .:.·.--':·--·:_.-·/. I -~ ·---~._-.·: .-··~ ···... ~ ·.· .. , .. ·_--..:::;--~·--: ··:·:(, ?,: __ .... ~~<· ... ~.--.: ··::.. ;. _; ":-~-:: .-·r : l I •. ,. ..... ,,· ... .. ··· ... -~r;~.:-~· • ..... . . ., "' . ' TITLE 24 REPORT FOR: Dominie Press, Inc. Kellogg Ave. Carlsbad, CA PROJECT DESIGNER: Kenneth D. Smith Architect & Assoc. 435 W. Bradley Ave., Suite C El Cajon, CA 92020 (619)442-2182 REPORT PREPARED BY: Steve Balderrama Haynal & Co., Inc. 425 West Fifth Street Escondido, CA 92025 (619) 743-5408 Job Number: Date: 1/2/1996 The COMPLY 24 computer program has been used to perform the calculations summarized in this compliance report. This program has approval and is authorized by the California Energy Commission for use with both the Residential and Nonresidential Building Energy Efficiency Standards. This program developed by Gabel Dodd Associates (510) 428-0803. Table Of Contents for Title 24 Report Cover Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Table of Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Form ENV-1 Envelope Certificate of Compliance ....................... 3 Form ENV-2 Envelope Summary ......................................... 5 Form ENV--3 Construction Assemblies 9 Form LTG-1 Lighting Certificate of Compliance ....................... 13 Fo:i;:-m LTG-2 Lighting Compliance Summary .............................. 15 Form MECH-1 Mechanical Certificate of Compliance .................... 16 Form MECH-2 Mechanical Summary ...................................... 20 Fonn MECH-3 Mechanical Equipment Summary ............................ 27 Form MECH-4 Mechanical Ventilation .................................. 28 .. ., CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE (part 1 of 2) ENV-1 page 3 of 28 -------------------------------------------------------------------------Project Name: Pominie Press, Inc. Date: 1/2/1996 Address: Kellogg Ave. Carlsbad, CA Envelope Designer: Kenneth D. Smith Architect & Assoc. Building Permit No Checked by/ Date COMPLY 24 User 2875 Documentation: Haynal & Co., Inc. ----·---------------------------------------------------------------------- GENERAL INFORMATION Date of Plans:=-'----.--=--,-Building Conditioned Floor Area: 5726 sf Building Type: Nonresidential Climate Zone: 7 Phase of Construction: X New Construction O Addition O Alteration Method of Envelope Compliance: Prescriptive -Overall Envelope STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE This Certificate of Compliance lists the building features and performance specifications needed to comply with Title 24, Part 6, Chapter 1 and Title 20, Chapter 2, Subchapter 4, Article 1 of the California Code of Regula- tions. This certificate applies only to building envelope requirements. The Principal Envelope Designer hereby certifies that the proposed build- ing design represented in this set of consttuction documents is consistent with the other compliance forms and worksheets, with the specifications, and with any other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed building has been designed to meet the envelope requirements contained in sections 110, 116 through 118, and 143 or 149 of Title 24, Part 6, Chapter 1. Please check one: 0 0 I hereby affirm that I am eligible under the provisions of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code to sign this document as the person responsible for its preparation; and that I am a civil engineer or architect. I affirm that I am eligible under the exemption to Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code by Section 5537.2 of the Business and Professions Code to sign this document as the person responsible for its preparation; and that I am a licensed contractor preparing docu- ments for work that I_ have contracted to perform. I affirm that I am eligible under the exemption to Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code by Section..,..........---of the Code to sign this document as the person responsible for its preparation.; and for the following reason: __ ---,,....;o.-,,c....--,,.-------- PRINCIPAL ENVELOPE DESIGNER Kenneth D. smith Architect & Assoc. (619)442-2182 ENVELOPE MANDATORY MEASURES Indicate location on plans of Note Block for Mandatory Measures: lt!O CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE (part 2 of 2) Project Name: Dominie Press, Inc. Documentation: Haynal & Co., Inc. OPAQU~ SURFACES Assembly Name Const Type Location/Comments ENV-1 page 4 of 28 Date: 1/2/1996 COMPLY 24 User 2875 Note to Field --------------·-----------------------Demising Wall 6" Concrete Wall R-19 Roof(R.19 on Tile) R-19 Floor(F.19.2x .16) FENESTRATION Frame Orient Panes Type ------------------ Front (N) 1 Metal Left (E) 1 Metal Back (S) 1 Metal Right (W} 1 Metal Wood None Wood Wood Exterior Shade -----------------------None None None None OH N N N N Glazing Type -----------------------Greylite #14 Greylite #14 Greylite #14 Greylite #14 OVERALL ENVELOPE METHOD Part 1 of 4 ENV-2 page 5 of 28 --------------------------------"------------------------------------------Project Name: Dominie Pre!;rn, Inc. Documentation: Haynal & Co., Inc. WINDOW AREA TEST A. Display Perimeter 0.0 ft X 6 ft = B. Gross Exterior Wall Area 4059.0 sf X 0.40 = C. Gross Exterior Wall Area 4059.0 sf X 0.10 = D. Enter Larger of A or B E. Enter Proposed Window Area If Eis greater than Dor less than C, proceed to for window area adjustment. If not, go to part 2 1. If Eis greater than D: D. Maximum Standard Area 1623.6 2. If Eis less than C: I E. Proposed Area 1817.0 = C. Minimum Standard Area N/A I E. Proposed Area N/A = Date: 1/2/1996 COMPLY 24 User 2875 0.0 sf Display Area 1623.6 sf 40% Area 405.9 sf Min Std Area 1623.6 sf Max Std Area 1817.0 sf Proposed Area the next calculation of 4. Window Adjustment Factor 0.8936 Window Adjustment Factor N/A ----·-------------------· -------------------------------------------------- SKYLIGHT AREA TEST Atrium Height 0.0 ft If Height< 55 ft If Height>= 55 ft Standard= 5% ----------+----------Standard= 10% I V A. Gross Exterior Roof Area 3313.0 sf X 0.05 = 165.7 sf Standard Area B-. Enter Proposed Skylight Area 0.0 sf Proposed Area If the Proposed Skylight Area is greater than the Standard Skylight Area, proceed to the next calculation for the skylight area adjustment. If not got to part 2 of 4. 1. If Proposed Skylight Area> Standard Skylight Area: Standard Skylight Area N/A I Proposed Skylight Area N/A = Skylight Adjustment Factor N/A OVERALL ENVELOPE METHOD Part 2 of 4 Project Name: Dominie Press, Inc. Documentation: Haynal & Co., Inc. OVERALL HEAT LOSS ENV-2 page 6 of 28 Date: 1/2/1996 COMPLY 24 User 2875 PROPOSED Adj. STANDARD Assembly Name Area 6 11 Concrete Wall 6 11 Concrete Wall R-19 Roof(R.19 on Tile) Greylite #14 Greylite #14 R-19 Roof(R.19 on Tile) 6 11 Concrete Wall 6 11 Concrete Wall Greylite #14 Greylite #14 6 11 Concrete Wall 611 Concrete Wall Greylite #14 Greylite #14 6 11 Concrete Wall 6 11 Concrete Wall R-19 Roof(R.19 on Tile) Greylite #14 Greylite #'14 Greylite #14 6" Concrete Wall R-19 Roof(R.19 on Tile) Greylite #14 · Greylite #14 6 11 Concrete Wall R-19 Roof(R.19 on Tile) Greylite #14 Greylite #14 6" Concrete Wall Greylite #14 6" Concrete Wall R-19 Roof(R.19 on Tile) Greylite #14 6 11 Concrete Wall 6 11 Concrete Wall R-19 Roof(R.19 on Tile) 6 11 Concrete Wall Greylite #14 Greylite #14 6 11 Concrete Wall Greylite #14 6 11 Concrete Wall Greylite #14 Greylite #14 6 11 Concrete Wall Greylite #14 Greylite #14 6 11 Concrete Wall Greylite #14 261. 0 273.0 603.0 96.0 399.0 265.0 248.0 80.0 64.0 64.0 72.0 137.0 64.0 27.0 72.0 25.0 450.0 96.0 48.0 200.0 129.0 462.0 104.0 64.0 88. 0 336.0 64.0 64.0 56.0 64.0 44.0 516.0 64.0 171.0 81.0 681.0 92.0 24.0 52.0 104.0 64.0 116.0 64.0 24.0 125.0 27.0 16.0 68.0 64.0 ** OVERALL HEAT LOSS COMPLIES HC U-Val UxA Area U-Val UxA 15.4 15.4 1.6 N/A N/A 1.6 15.4 15.4 N/A N/A 15.4 15.4 N/A N/A 15.4 15.4 1.6 'N/A N/A N/A 15.4 1.6 N/A N/A 15.4 1.6 N/A N/A 15.4 N/A 15.4 1.6 N/A 15.4 15.4 1.6 15.4 N/A N/A 15.4 N/A 15.4 N/A N/A 15.4 N/A N/A 15.4 N/A 0.752 0.752 0.043 1.100 1.100 0.043 0.752 0.752 1.100 1.100 0.752 0.752 1.100 1.100 0.752 0.752 0.043 1.100 1.100 1.100 0.752 0.043 1.100 1.100 0.752 0.043 1.100 1.100 0.752 1.100 0.752 0.043 1.100 0.752 0.752 0 .-043 0.752 1.100 1.100 0.752 1.100 0.752 1.100 1.100 0.752 1.100 1.100 0.752 1.100 196.2 205.3 26.1 105.6 438.9 11.5 186.5 60.2 70.4 70.4 54.1 103.0 70.4 29.7 54.1 18.8 19.5 105.6 52.8 220.0 97.0 20.0 114.4 70.4 66.2 14.5 70.4 70.4 42.1 70.4 33.1 22.3 70.4 128.6 60.9 29.4 69.2 26.4 57.2 78.2 70.4 87.2 70.4 26.4 94.0 29.7 17.6 51.1 70.4 Total 3827.7 271. 2 315.5 603.0 85.8 356.5 265.0 254.8 86.8 57.2 57.2 72.0 146.7 57.2 24.1 87.3 46.3 450.0 85.8 42.9 178.7 146.9 462.0 92.9 57.2 101.6 336.0 57.2 57.2 62.8 57.2 50.8 516.0 57.2 171.0 81.0 681.0 100.1 21.4 46.5 110.8 57.2 125.4 57.2 21.4 129.6 24.1 14.3 74.8 57.2 0.690 0.690 0.078 1.230 1.230 0.078 0.690 0.690 1.230 1.230 0.690 0.690 1.230 1.230 0.690 0.690 0.078 1.230 1.230 1.230 0.690 0.078 1.230 1.230 0.690 0.078 1.230 1.230 0.690 1.230 0.690 0.078 1.230 0.690 0.690 0.078 0.690 1.230 1.230 0.690 1.230 0.690 1.230 1.230 0.690 1.230 1.230 0.690 1.230 187.1 217.7 47.0 105.5 438.5 20.7 175.8 59.9 70.3 70.3 49.7 101.2 70.3 29.7 60.3 31.9 35.1 105.5 52.8 219.8 101.3 36.0 114.3 70.3 70.1 26.2 70.3 70.3 43.3 70.3 35.1 40.2 70.3 118.0 55.9 53.1 69.1 26.4 57.2 76.5 70.3 86.5 70.3 26.4 89.4 29.7 17.6 51.6 70.3 Total 3935.9 PROPOSED UA <= STANDARD UA ** OVERALL ENVELOPE METHOD Part 3 of 4 Project Name: Dominie Press, Inc. Documentation: Haynal & Co., Inc. OVERALL HEAT GAIN Glazing North East North West West West North North West West West West West West South West West West West West West West West WF 0.34 1.02 0.34 1.34 1.34 1.34 0.34 0.34 1.34 1.34 1.34 1.34 1.34 1.34 1.31 1.34 1.34 1.34 1.34 1.34 1.34 1.34 1.34 PROPOSED Area SC H 96.0 0.52 399.0 0.52 64.0 0.52 64.0 0.52 64.0 0.52 27.0 0.52 96.0 0.52 48.0 0.52 200.0 0.52 104.0 0.52 64. 0 0. 52 64.0 0.52 64.0 0.52 64.0 0.52 64.0 0.52 24.0 0.52 52.0 0.52 64.0 0.52 64.0 0.52 24.0 0.52 27.0 0.52 16.0 0.52 64.0 0.52 ** OVERALL HEAT GAIN COMPLIES V OHF Total 17.0 211.6 11.3 44.6 44.6 18.8 17.0 8.5 139.4 72.5 44.6 44.6 44.6 44.6 43.6 16.7 36.2 44.6 44.6 16.7 18.8 11.1 44.6 Total 1040.6 ENV-2 page 7 of 28 Date: 1/2/1996 COMPLY 24 User 2875 STANDARD Area RSHG Total 85.8 0.94 356.5 0.71 57.2 0.94 57.2 0.71 57.2 0.71 24.1 0.71 85.8 0.94 42.9 0.94 178.7 0.71 92.9 0.71 57.2 0.71 57.2 0.71 57.2 0.71 57.2 0.71 57.2 0.71 21.4 0.71 46.5 0.71 57.2 0.71 57.2 0.71 21.4 0.71 24.1 0.71 14.3 0.71 57.2 0.71 27.4 258.2 18.3 54.4 54.4 23.0 27.4 13.7 170.0 88.4 54.4 54.4 54.4 54.4 53.2 20.4 44.2 54.4 54.4 20.4 23.0 13.6 54.4 Total 1290.8 PROPOSED HG<= STANDARD HG** OVERALL ENVELOPE METHOD Part 4 of 4 Project Name: Dominie Press, Inc. Documentation: Haynal & Co., Inc. Window Area Adjustment Calculations Wall Name North East North West North West North West West West West South South West West West West West West Gross Dir Area N E N w N w N w w w w s s w w w w w w 357.0 672.0 312.0 144.0 72.0 228.0 216.0 22"5. 0 297,0 216.0 120.0 108.0 171. 0 81.0 168.0 168.0 204.0 168.0 132.0 TOTALS 4059.0 Skylight Area Adjustment Calculations Roof Name R-19 Roof R-19 Roof R-19 Roof R-19 Roof R-19 Roof R-19 Roof R-19 Roof Gross Dir Area H H H H H H H 603.0 265.0 450.0 462.0 336.0 516.0 681.0 TOTALS 3313.0 Door Area ENV-2 page 8 of 28 Date: 1/2/1996 COMPLY 24 User 2875 Window Adjust Area Factor 96.0 399.0 64.0 64.0 0.0 91.0 144.0 200.0 168.0 128.0 64.0 64.0 0.0 0.0 76.0 64.0 88.0 43.0 64.0 0.8936 0.8936 0.8936 0.8936 0.8936 0.8936 0.8936 0.8936 0.8936 0.8936 0.8936 0.8936 0.8936 0.8936 0.8936 0.8936 0.8936 0.8936 0.8936 Adjusted Window Wall Area Area 85.8 356.5 57.2 57.2 0.0 81.3 128.7 178.7 150.1 114.4 57.2 57.2 0.0 0.0 67.9 57.2 78.6 38.4 57.2 271. 2 315.5 254.8 86.8 72.0 146.7 87.3 46.3 146.9 101.6 62.8 50.8 171. 0 81.0 100.1 110.8 125.4 129.6 74.8 0.0 1817.0 1623.6 2435.4 Adjusted Skylt Area Adjust Skylt Roof Factor Area Area 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 603.0 265.0 450.0 462.0 336.0 516.0 681.0 0.0 3313.0 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ASSEMBLY Project Name: Dominie Press, Inc. Documentation: Haynal & Co., Inc. COMPONENT DESCRIPTION Sketch of Construction Asseml:::>ly ASSEMBLY U-VALUE Construction Components Outside Air Film 1. Gypsum or Plaster Board 2. Insulation, Mineral Fiber, R-11 3. Gypsum or Plaster Board 4. 5. 6. 7 . 8 . 9. Inside Air Film ENV-3 page 9 of 28 Date: 1/2/1996 COMPLY 24 User 2875 Assembly Name: Demising Wall Assembly Type: Wall Assembly Tilt: 90 deg (Vertical) Framing Material: Wood Framing Spacing: II 0.C. Framing Percent: 15.0 %' Absorptivity: 0.70 Roughness: Brick, Plaster Th R-Value Fr (in) Cavity Frame 0.500 * 3.500 0.500 0.17 0.45 11.00 0.45 0.17 0.45 3.46 0.45 Unadjusted R-Values 0.68 12.75 0.68 5.21 ADJUSTMENT FOR FRAMING (1 /12.75) X (0.85) + (1 / 5.21) X (0.15) = 0.095 Weight: Heat Capacity: 5.8 lb/sqft 1.70 TOTAL U-VALUE = TOTAL R-VALUE = 0.095 ---------- 10.48 ---------- PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ASSEMBLY ENV-3 page 10 of 28 -------------------------·-------------------------------------------------Project Name: Dominie Press, Inc. Documentation: Haynal & Co., Inc. Date: 1/2/1996 COMPLY 24 User 2875 ----------------------------------------------·---------------------------- COMPONENT DESCRIPTION -----------------------------~- Sketch of Construction Assembly ASSEMBLY U-VALUE Construction Components Assembly Name: 6 11 Concrete Wall Assembly Type: Wall Assembly Tilt: 90 deg (Vertical) Framing Material: None Framing Spacing: "O.C. Framing Percent: 0.0 % Absorptivity: 0.70 Roughness: Concrete, Asph. Shingles Th R-Value Fr ·(in) Cavity Frame . ----------------------------------------------------------------------------Outside Air Film 1. Concrete, 140 lb, Not Dried 2. 3 • 4. 5. 6. 7. 8 • 9. Inside Air Film 6.000 0.17 0.48 0.17 0.48 Unadjusted R-Values 0.68 1.33 0.68 1. 33 ADJUSTMENT FOR FRAMING (1 / 1.33) X (1.00) + (1 / 1.33) X (0.00) Weight: Heat Capacity: 70.0 lb/sqft 15.40 = 0.752 TOTAL U-VALUE = 0.752 ---------- TOTAL R-VALUE = 1.33 ---------- PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ASSEMBLY Project Name: Dominie Press, Inc. Documentation:rHaynal & Co., Inc. ENV-3 page 11 of 28 Date: 1/2/1996 COMPLY 24 User 2875 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- COMPONENT DESCRIPTION Sketch of Construction Assembly ASSEMBLY U-VALUE Construction Components Outside Air Film 1. Roofing, Built-Up 2. Membrane, Vapor-Permeable Felt 3. Plywood 4. Air Space 5. Insulation, Mineral Fiber, R-19 6. Acoustical Tile, Interior Finish 7. 8 . 9. Inside Air Film Assembly Name: R-19 Roof(R.19 on Tile) Assembly Type: Roof Assembly Tilt: 22 deg (Tilted Up) Framing Material: Wood Framing Spacing: II 0.C. Framing Percent: 10.0 % Absorptivity: 0.70 Roughness: Concrete, Asph. Shingles Th R-Value Fr (in) Cavity Frame 0.375 0.010 0.625 1.250 6.000 0.500 0.17 0.33 0.06 0.77 0.75 19.00 1.43 0.17 0.33 0.06 0.77 0.75 19.00 1.43 Unadjusted R-Values 0.61 23.12 0.61 23.12 ADJUSTMENT FOR FRAMING (1 /23.12) X (0.90) + (1 /23.12) X (0.10) = 0.043 Weight: Heat Capacity: 4.9 lb/sgft 1.55 TOTAL U-VALUE = TOTAL R-VALUE = 0.043 ---------- 23.12 ---------- PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ASSEMaLY Project Name: Dominie Press, Inc. Documentation: Haynal & Co., Inc. COMPONENT DESCRIPTION ----------------------------- Sketch of Construction Assembly ASSEMBLY U-VALUE Construct.ion Components Outside Air Film 1. Insulation, Mineral Fiber, R-19 2. Plywood 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8 • 9. Inside Air Film ENV-3 page 12 of 28 Date: 1/2/1996 COMPLY 24 User 2875 Assembly Name: R-19 Floor(F.19.2x .16) Assembly Type: Floor Assembly Tilt: 180 deg (Horizontal Floor) Framing Material: Wood Framing Spacing: II 0.C. Framing Percent: 10.0 % Absorptivity: 0.70 Roughness: Stucco, Wood Shingles Th R-Value Fr (in) Cavity Frame 0.17 * 6.000 19.00 0.625 0.77 0.17 5.94 0.77 Unadjusted R-Values 0.92 20.86 0.92 7.80 ADJUSTMENT FOR FRAMING (1 /20.86) X (0.90) + (1 / 7.80) X (0.10) Weight: Heat Capacity:. 3.8 lb/sqft 1.24 = 0.056 TOTAL U-VALUE = 0.056 ---------- TOTAL R-VALUE = 17.87 ---------- CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE (part 1 of 2) LTG-1 page 13 of 28 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------Project Name: Dominie Press, Inc. Address: Kellogg Ave. Lighting Designer: Carlsbad, CA Documentation: Haynal & Co., Inc. . - Date: 1/2/1996 Building Permit No Checked by/ Date COMPLY 24 User 2875 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- GENERAL INFORMATION Date of Plans:=-=-------,-=-..,..,... Building Conditioned Floor Area: 5726 sf Building Type: Nonresidential Climate Zone: 7 Phase of Construction: X New Construction Method of Lighting Compliance: Prescriptive STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE O Addition O Alteration This Certificate of Compliance lists the·-building features and performance specifications needed to comply with Title 24, Part 6, Chapter 1 and Title 20, Chapter 2, Subchapter 4, Article 1 of the California Code of Regula- tions. This certificate applies only to building lighting requirements. The Principal Lighting Designer hereby certifies that the proposed build- ing design represented in this set of construction documents is consistent with the other compliance forms and worksheets, with the specifications, and with any other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed building has been designed to meet the lighting requirements contained in sections 110, 119, 130 through 132 and 146 or 149. Please check one: O I hereby affirm that I am eligible under the provisions of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code to sign this document as the person responsible for its preparation; and that I am a civil engineer electrical engineer or architect. ~irm that I am eligible under the exemption to Division 3 of the 'Business and Professions Code by Section 5537.2 of the Business and Professions Code to sign this document as the person responsible for its preparation; and that I am a licensed contractor preparing docu- ments for work that I have contracted to perform. o I affirm that I am eligible under the exemption to Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code by Section~---of the Code to sign this document as the person responsible for its preparation; and for the following re~,~~~ ' -'"' ,.-~ PRINCIPAL LIGHTING DESIGNER {__/~J,.,.N,-//~ ,Y (Signature) (Lie.#? ~ate) LIGHTING MANDATORY MEASURES Indicate location on plans of Note Block for Mandatory Measures: /r!O CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE (part 2 of 2) LTG-1 page 14 of 28 ------------------------------------. --------------------------------------Project Name: Dominie Press, Inc. Documentation: Haynal & Co., Inc. Date: 1/2/1996 COMPLY 24 User 2875 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- INSTALLED LIGHTING SCHEDULE No of Name Lamp Type Lamps ----------------------- Fluorescent 2 Fluorescent 3 Incandescent 1 MANDATORY AUTOMATIC CONTROLS Control Watts/ Ballast Ballasts/ Lamp Type Lurninaire -------------------------34 Standard 1.0 34 Standard 1.5 75 n/a n/a Control Location ID Control Type Space Controlled CONTROLS FOR CREDIT Control Control Location ID Control Type Space Controlled No of Fixt. ----- 9 54 3 Note to Field ------- Note to Field Note to Field LIGHTING COMPLIANCE SUMMARY Project Name: Dominie Press, Inc. Documentation: Haynal & Co., Inc. LTG-2 page 15 of 28 Date: 1/2/1996 COMPLY 24 User 2875 ---------------------------·----------------------------------------------- ACTUAL µIGHTING POWER No of Name Description Lumin ---------------------------------------------- 48" T-12 Low Watt /2 Lamp 48 11 T-12 Low Watt /3 Lamp (Tandem) 75 w Surface Mount Incandescent 9 54 3 Watts per ----- 72.0 108.0 75.0 Default -------y -y- -y--- Total Watts 648.0 5832.0 225.0 SubTotal 6705 Less Control Credits (LTG-3) O Total Proposed Watts 6705 * If not CEC Default value, please provide supporting documentation. ALLOWED LIGHTING POWER BY SPACE Space Name Reception Hall(Landing) Office 102 Lunch 103 I:tall/Restrqom Office 201/202 Office 203/204 Office 205/206 Office 104 Offc 207/208/9 Hall/Restrooms Storage Manufacturing Order Process 104 Hall/Stairwell Office Occupancy Lobby. (General) Corridor/Restroom Office Dining Area Corridor/Restroom Office Office Office Office Office Corridor/Restroom Industrial Storage Industrial Work Office Corridor/Restroom Office TOTALS Allowed Floor LPD Total Tailored Area (w/sf) (watts) (watts) 868 265 357 361 156 450 462 336 140 516 681 210 210 255 294 165 1.600 0.800 1.600 1.200 0.800 1.600 1.600 1.600 1.600 1.600 0.800 0.600 1.300 1.600 0.800 1.600 5726 1.332 1389 212 571 433 125 720 739 538 224 826 545 126 273 408 235 264 7627 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * Note: Tailored Allotment requires supporting documentation on form LTG-4. CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE (part 1 of 3) MECH-1 page 16 of 28 ----------------------------------------.----------------------------------Project Name: Dominie Press, Inc. Address: Kellogg Ave. Carlsbad, CA Mechanical Designer: Slayton Mechanical Documentation: Haynal & Co., Inc. Date: 1/2/1996 Building Permit No Checked by/ Date COMPLY 24 User 2875 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- GENERAL INFORMATION Date of Plans:=-------.--=--,-Building Conditioned Floor Area: 5726 sf Building Type: Nonresidential Climate Zone: 7 Phase of Construction: X New Construction O Addition O Alteration Method of Mechanical Compliance: Prescriptive Proof of Envelope Compliance: O Previous Permit X Compliance Attached STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE This Certificate of Compliance lists the building features and performance specifications needed to comply with Title 24, Part 6, Chapter 1 and Title 20, Chapter 2, Subchapter 4, Article 1 of the California Code of Regula- tions. This certificate applies only to building mechanical requirements. The Principal Mechanical Designer hereby certifies that the proposed build- ing design represented in this set of construction documents is consistent with the other compliance forms and worksheets, with the specifications, and with any other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed building has been designed to meet the mechanical requirements contained in sections 110 through 115, 120 through 124, 140 through 142,144 and 145. Please check one: o I hereby affirm that I am eligible under the provisions of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code to sign this document as the person responsible for its, preparation; and that I am a civil engineer mechanical engineer or architect. ,/. I affirm that I am eligible under the exemption to Division 3 of the ""'-.Business and Professions Code by Section 5537.2 of the Business and Professions Code to sign this document as the person responsible for its preparation; and that I am a licensed contractor preparing docu- ments for work that I have contracted to perform. O I affirm that I am eligible under the exemption to Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code by Section ____ of the Code to sign this document as the person responsible for its preparation; and for the following r~n-. g~!~~~~~e~~;~!iAL DESIGNER ~ &tmi wq,(, (619)449-1272 gnature) (Lie. ~te) MECHANICAL MANDATORY MEASURES Indicate location on plans of Note Block for Mandatory Measures: /t!O CERT.IFICATE OF COMPLIANCE (part 2 of 3) MECH-1 page 17 of 28 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------Project Name: Dominie Press, Inc. Documentation: Haynal & Co., Inc. Date: 1/2/1996 COMPLY 24 User 2875 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- SYSTEM FEATURES Zone Name Reception/Hall(Landing) Office 102/Hall/Restrm Time Control __ s __ Setback Control None # of Isolation Zonesn/a HP Thermostat Yes Electric Heat 0.0 KW Fan Control Constant Volume VAV Min Position n/a $imul. Heat/Cool n/a Heat Supply Reset Constant Temp Cool Supply Reset Constant Temp Ventilation B OA Damper Control --A-- Economizer Type No Economizer Outdoor Air CFM 500 Heat Equip Type Heat Pump Make & Model No. Rheem RPND-061 Cool Equip Type DX Make and Model Zone Name Office 201/202 Time Control S Setback Control None-- # Of Isolation Zonesn/a HP Thermostat Yes Electric Heat 0.0 KW Fan Control Constant Volume VAV Min Position n/a Simul. Heat/Cool n/a Heat Supply Reset Constant Temp Cool Supply Reset Constant Temp Ventilation B OA Damper Control --A-- Economizer Type No Economizer OutdbO+ Air CFM 68 Heat Equip Type Heat Pump Make & Model No. Rheem RPND-037 Cool Equip Type DX Make and Model Code Tables s None-- n/a Yes 0.0 KW Constant Volume n/a n/a Constant Temp Constant Temp B -A- No Economizer 77 Heat Pump Rheem RQKA-A024JK DX Office 203/204 s None-- n/a Yes 0.0 KW Constant Volume n/a n/a Constant Temp Constant Temp B -A- No Economizer 69 Heat Pump Rheem RPND-031 DX --. ----------------------------------------------Time Control S:Prog Switch O:Occ Sensor M:Man Timer Ventilation B:Air Balance C:OA Cert. M:OA Measure D:Demand Cont N:Nattiral OA Damper A:Auto G:Gravity Note to Field CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE (part 2 of 3) Project Name: Dominie Press, Inc. Documentation: Haynal & Co., Inc. SYSTEM 1:i'EATURES Zone Name Office 205/206 Time Control S Setback Control None-- # of Isolation Zonesn/a HP Thermostat Yes Electric Heat 0.0 KW Fan Control Constant Volume VAV Min Position n/a Simul. Heat/Cool n/a Heat Supply Reset Constant Temp Cool Sup~ly Reset Constant Temp Ventilation B OA Dam~er Control --A-- Economizer Type No Economizer Outdoor Air CFM 71 Heat Equip Type Heat Pump Make & Model No. Rheem RPND-037 Cool Equip Type DX Make arid Model Zone Name Lunch/Storg/Mnf/104/Ofc Time Control S . Setback Control None-- # of Isolation Zonesn/a HP Thermostat Yes Electric Heat 0.0 KW Fan Control Constant Volume VAV Min.Position n/a Simul. Heat/Cool n/a Heat Supply Reset Constant Temp Cool Supply Reset Constant Temp Ventilation B . OA Damper Control --A-- Economizer Type No Economizer Outdoor Air CFM 361 Heat Equip Type Heat Pump Make & Model No. Rheem RPND-061 Cool Equip Type DX Make and Model Code Tables MECH-1 page 18 of 28 Date: 1/2/1996 COMPLY 24 User 2875 Office 207/208/209/Hall s None-- n/a Yes 0.0 KW Constant Volume n/a n/a Constant Temp Constant Temp B -A- No Economizer 180 Heat Pump Rheem RPND-043 DX Note to Field Time Control S:Prog Switch , O: 0cc Sensor M:Man Timer Ventilation B:Air Balance C:OA Cert. M:OA Measure D:Demand Cont N:Natural OA Damper A:Auto G:Gravity CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE (part 3 of 3) MECH-1 page 19 of 28 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------Project Name: Dominie Press, Inc. Documentation: Haynal & Co., Inc. DUCT INSULATION System Name Type ------------------------------ Rheem RPND-061 Heating Cooling Rheem RQKA-A024JK Heating Rheem RPND-037 Cooling Heating Rheem RPND-031 Cooling Heating Cooling Rheem RPND-037 Heating Cooling Rheem RPND-043 Heating Cooling Rheem RPND-061 Heating Cooling Duct Location -------------------Ducts in Attic Ducts in Attic Ducts in Attic Ducts in Attic Ducts in Attic Ducts in Attic Ducts in Attic Ducts in Attic bucts in Attic Ducts in Attic Ducts in Attic Ducts in Attic Ducts in Attic Ducts in Attic Insul PIPE INSULATION System Name Pipe Type Required Domestic Hot Water y / N NOTES TO FIELD -For Building Department Use Only Date: 1/2/1996 COMPLY 24 User 2875 Duct Tape Allowed ------- y I N y ~ N y N y I N y I N y I N y I N y I N y I N y I N y I N y I N y I N y I N Insul Note to R-Val Field 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 Note to Field MECHANICAL SIZING AND FAN POWER MECH-2 page 20 of 28 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------Project Name: Dominie Press, Inc. Documentation: Haynal & Co., Inc. SIZING AND EQUIPMENT SELECTION HVAC Zone Name: Heating System Name: Cooling system Name: System Multiplier: Peak Load Method: Relative Humidity: 1. DESIGN CONPITIONS FOR Carlsbad 2. SIZING SPACES SERVED BY SYSTEM PEAK Reception Hali(Landing) (Jan 12am) (Jan 12am) TOTAL SPACE LOAD Duct Gains & Losses: Ventilation: ( 489 CFM) Return Air Lighting Gain TOTAL SYSTEM LOAD 3. SELECTION A. Safety/Warmup Factor B. Maximum Adjusted Load C. Installed Equipment Capacity Btu/hr ------- 36348 1052 ------- 37400 3740 16863 ------- 58003 1.43 82944 49594 Date: 1/2/1996 COMPLY 24 User 2875 Reception/Hall(Landing) Rheem RPND-061 HEATING 38 F PEAK (Aug 10am) (Aug 10am) 1 COINCIDENT 50 % COOLING SENSIBLE LATENT 83 F 67 F Btu/hr Btu/hr -------------- 35607 3741 1576 166 -------------- 37183 3907 3718 527 623 0 -------------- 41428 4530 1.21 50128 42870 16660 If Line 3-C > Line 3-B, Explain: ___________________ _ FAN POWER CONSUMPTION No. Efficiency Peak Conv Peak Supply Fan Description Sys BHP Motor Drive HP Fact Watts CFM --------·------------------------------------------- Supply Fan 1 X 0.39 I [O. 66 X 1. 00] = 0 .59 X 746 = 441 2000 ---------------- Totals 0.59 441 2000 FAN POWER DEMAND 441 watts/ 2000 cfm = 0.220 watts/cfm MECHANICAL SIZING AND FAN POWER MECH-2 page 21 of 28 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------Project Name: Dominie Press, Inc. Date: 1/2/1996 Documentation: Haynal & Co., Inc. S.IZING AND EQUIPMENT SELECTION HVAC Zone Name: Heating System Name: Cooling System Name: System Multiplier: Peak Load Method: Relative Humidity: 1. DESIGN CONDITIONS FOR Carlsbad 2; SIZING SPACES SERVED BY SYSTEM PEAK Office 102 Hall/Restroom (Jan 12am) (Jan 12am) TOTAL SPACE LOAD Duct Gains & Losses: ventiiation: ( 74 CFM) Return Air Lighting Gain TOTAL SYSTEM LOAD 3. SELECTION A. Safety/Warmup Factor B. Maximum Adjusted Load C. Installed Equipment Capacity Btu/hr ... ------ 13424 4-04 ------- 13828 1383 2567 ------- 17778 1.43 25423 18854 COMPLY 24 User 2875 Office 102/Hall/Restrm Rheem RQKA-A024JK HEATING 38 F PEAK (Aug 5pm) (Aug 5pm) 1 COINCIDENT 50 %' COOLING SENSIBLE LATENT 83 F 67 F Btu/hr Btu/hr -------------- 11482 410 1267 156 -------------- 12749 566 1275 241 95 0 -------------- 14265 661 1.21 17261 17065 7157 If Line 3-C > Line 3-B, Explain: ___________________ _ FAN POWER CONSUMPTION No. ~fficiency Peak Conv Peak Supply Fan Description Sys BHP Motor Drive HP Fact Watts CFM --------------------------------------------------- Supply Fan 1 X 0.16 I [O. 55 X 1. 00] = 0.29 X 746 = 217 800 ---------------- Totals 0.29 217 800 FAN POWER DEMAND 217 watts/ 800 cfm = 0.271 watts/cfm MECHANICAL SIZING AND FAN POWER MECH-2 page 22 of 28 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------Project Name: Dominie Press, Inc. Date: 1/2/1996 Documentation: Haynal & Co., Inc. COMPLY 24 User 2875 ---------------------------------"----------------------------------------- SIZING AND EQUIPMENT SELECTION HVAC Zone Name: Heating System Name: Cooling System Name: System Multiplier: Peak Load Method: Relative Humidity: 1. DESIGN CONDITIONS FOR Carlsbad 2. SIZING S·PACES SERVED BY SYSTEM PEAK Office 201/202 (Jan 12am) TOTAL SPACE LOAD Duct Gains & Losses: Ventilation: ( 64 CFM) Return Air Lighting Gain TOTAL SYST~M LOAD 3. SELECTION A. Safety/Warmup Factor B. Maximum Adjusted Load C. Installed Equipment Capacity Btu/hr ------- 16230 ------- 16230 1623 2218 ------- 20071 1.43 28702 2·9955 Office 201/202 Rheem RPND-037 1 COINCIDENT 50 % HEATING 38 F COOLING SENSIBLE LATENT 83 F 67 F PEAK Btu/hr Btu/hr -------------- (Aug 5pm) 21098 321 -------------- 21098 321 2110 208 82 0 -------------- 23416 403 1.21 28333 26063 9948 If Line 3-C > Line 3-B, Explain:_E.E.S. -SECTION 144(a) _______ _ .FAN POWER CONSUMPTION No. Efficiency Peak Conv Peak Supply Fan Description Sys BHP Motor Drive HP Fact Watts CFM --------------------------------------------------- Supply Fan 1 X 0.24 I [O. 60 X 1.00] = 0.40 X 746 = 298 1200 ---------------- Totals 0.40 298 1200 FAN POWER DEMAND 298 watts/ 1200 cfm = 0.249 watts/cfm MECHANICAL SIZING AND FAN POWER MECH-2 page 23 of 28 ------------------------,--------------------------------------------------Project Name: Dominie Press, Inc. Documentation: Haynal & Co., Inc. Date: 1/2/1996 COMPLY 24 User 2875 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIZING AND EQUIPMENT SELECTION HVAC Zone Name: Heating System Name: Cooling System Name: System Multiplier: Peak Load Method: Relative Humidity: 1. DESIGN CONDITIONS FOR Carlsbad 2. SIZING SPACES SERVED BY SYSTEM PEAK Office ,203/204 (Jan 12am) TOTAL SPACE LOAD Duct Gains & Losses: Ventilation: ( 66 CFM) Return Air Lighting Gain TOTAL SYSTEM LOAD 3. SELECTION A. Safety/Warmup Factor B. Maximum Adjusted Load C. Installed Equipment Capacity Btu/hr ------- 10852 ------- 10852 1085 2277 ------- 14214 1.43 20326 23936 Office 203/204 Rheem RPND-031 1 COINCIDENT 50 % HEATING 38 F COOLING SENSIBLE LATENT 83 F 67 F PEAK Btu/hr Btu/hr -------------- (Aug 5pm) 17282 330 -------------- 17282 330 1728 213 84 0 -------------- 19223 414 1.21 23260 22185 8468 If Line 3-C > Line 3-B, Exp1ain:_E.E.S. -SECTION 144(a) _______ _ FAN POWER CONSUMPTION No. Efficiency Peak Conv Peak Supply Fan Description Sys BHP Motor Drive HP Fact Watts CFM ---------------------------------------------------- Supply Fan 1 X 0.20 I [0.60 X 1. 00] = 0.33 X 746 = 249 1000 ---------------- Totals 0.33 249 1000 FAN POWER DEMAND 249 watts/ 1000 cfm = 0.249 watts/cfm MECHANICAL SIZING AND FAN POWER Project Name: Dominie Press, Inc. Documentation: Haynal & Co., Inc. MECH-2 page 24 of 28 Date: 1/2/1996 COMPLY 24 User 2875 ---------------------------------·----------------------------------------- SIZING AND EQUIPMENT SELECTION HVAC Zone Name: Heating System Name: Cooling System Name: System Multiplier: Peak Load Method: Relative Humidity: 1. DESIGN COND"ITIONS FOR Carlsbad 2. SIZING SPACES SERVED BY SYSTEM PEAK Office 205/206 Office 104 (Jan 12am) (Jan 12am) TOTAL SPACE LOAD Duct Gains & Losses: Ventilation: ( 68 CFM) Return Air Lighting Gain TOTAL SYSTEM LOAD 3. SELECTION A. Safety/Warmup Factor B. Maximum Adjusted Load C. Installed Equipment Capacity Btu/hr ------- 7957 3962 ------- 11919 1192 2346 ------- 15457 1.43 22104 28855 Office 205/206 Rheem RPND-037 1 COINCIDENT 50 % HEATING 38 F COOLING SENSIBLE LATENT 83 F 67 F PEAK Btu/hr Btu/hr -------------- (Aug 5pm) 13012 240 (Aug 5pm) 6589 100 -------------- 19601 340 1960 220 87 0 -------------- 21781 427 1.21 26355 26063 9948 If Line 3-C > Line 3-B, Explain:_E.E.S. -SECTION 144(a) _______ _ FAN POWER CONSUMPTION No. Efficiency Peak Conv Peak Supply Fan Description Sys BHP Motor Drive HP Fact Watts CFM ---------------------------------------------------- Supply Fan 1 X 0.24 I [O. 60 X 1. 00] = 0.40 X 746 = 298 1200 ---------------- Totals 0.40 298 1200 FAN POWER DEMAND 298 watts/ 1200 cfm = 0.249 watts/cfm MECHANICAL SIZING AND FAN POWER MECH-2 page 25 of 28 -------------------------" -------------------------------------------------Project Name: Dominie Press, Inc. Documentation: Hayrtal & Co., Inc. SIZING AND EQUIPMENT SELECTION HVAC Zone Name: Heating System Name: Cooling Syst:em Name: System Multiplier: Peak Load Method: Relatlve Humidity: 1. DESIGN CONDITIONS FOR Carlsbad 2. ·SIZING SPACES SERVED BY SYSTEM PEAK Offc 207/208/9 Hall/Restrooms (Jan 12am) {Jan 12am) TOTAL SPACE LOAD Duct Gains & Losses: Ventilation: ( 201 CFM) Return Air Lighting Gain TOTAL SYSTEM LOAD 3. SELECTION A. Safety/Warmup Factor B. Maximum Adjusted Load C. Installed Equipment Capacity Btu/hr ------- 5361 8768 ------- 14129 1413 6948 ------- 22490 1.43 32161 34019 Date: 1/2/1996 COMPLY 24 User 2875 Office 207/208/209/Hall Rheem RPND-043 HEATING 38 F PEAK (Aug 3pm) (Aug 3pm) 1 COINCIDENT 50 % COOLING SENSIBLE LATENT 83 F 67 F Btu/hr Btu/hr -------------- 12313 843 10339 916 -------------- 22652 1759 2265 1086 257 0 -------------- 26003 2016 1.21 31464 30879 11572 If Line 3-C > Line 3-B, Explain:_E.E.S. -SECTION 144(a) _______ _ FAN POWER CONSUMPTION No. Efficiency Peak Conv Peak Supply Fart Description Sys BHP Motor Drive HP Fact Watts CFM ---------------------------------------------------- Supply Fan 1 X 0.28 I (0. 64 X 1.00] = 0.44 X 746 = 326 1400 ---------------- Totals 0.44 326 1400 FAN POWER DEMAND 326 watts/ 1400 cfm = 0.233 watts/cfm MECHANICAL SIZING AND FAN POWER MECH-2 page 26 of 28 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------. . Project Name: Dominie Press, Inc. Documentation: Haynal & Co., Inc. Date: 1/2/1996 COMPLY 24 User 2875 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIZING AND EQUIPMENT SELECTION HVAC Zone Name: Heating System Name: Cooling System Name: System Multiplier: Peak Load Method: Relative Humidity: 1. DESIGN CONDITIONS FOR Carlsbad 2. SIZING SPACES SERVED BY SYSTEM PEAK Lunch 103 Storage Manufacturing Order Process 104 Hall/Stairwell Office Warehouse {Jan 12am) (Jan 12am) (Jan 12am) (Jan 12am) (Jan 12am) (Jan 12am) (Jan 12am) TOTAL SPACE LOAD Duct Gains & Losses: Ventilation: ( 445 CFM) Return Air Lighting Gain TOTAL SYSTEM LOAD 3. SELECTION A. Safety/Warmup Factor B. Maximum Adjusted Load C. Installed Equipment Capacity Btu/hr ------- 8232 4889 4755 5889 4521 3889 0 ------- 32175 3218 15366 ------- 50759 1.43 72585 49594 Lunch/Storg/Mnf/104/Ofc Rheem RPND-061 HEATING 38 F PEAK (Aug 5pm) (Aug 5pm) (Aug 5pm) (Aug 5pm) (Aug 5pm) (Aug 5pm) (Aug 5pm) 1 COINCIDENT 50 % COOLING SENSIBLE LATENT 83 F 67 F Btu/hr Btu/hr -------------- 11704 1712 7469 100 7125 499 9292 182 5763 184 6347 118 0 0 -------------- 47700 2795 4770 1441 568 0 -------------- 53911 3363 1.21 65232 42663 16284 If Line 3-C > Line 3-B, Explain: ___________________ _ FAN POWER CONSUMPTION No. Efficiency Peak Conv Peak Supply Fan Description Sys BHP Motor Drive HP Fact Watts CFM ---------------------------------------------------- Supply Fan 1 X 0.39 I [O. 66 X 1. 00] = 0.59 X 746 = 441 2000 ---------------- Totals 0.59 441 2000 FAN POWER DEMAND 441 watts/ 2000 cfm = 0.220 watts/cfm MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SUMMARY Project Name: Dominie Press, Inc. Documentation: Haynal & Co., Inc. CENTRAL SYSTEM SUMMARY Sys No System Name System Type --------------------------------------1 Rheem RQKA-A024JK Packaged Heat Pu 2 Rheem RPND-031 Packaged Heat Pu 3 Rheem RPND-037 Packaged Heat Pu 4 Rheem RPND-043 Packaged Heat Pu 5 Rheem RPND-061 Packaged Heat Pu CENTRAL SYSTEM RA.TINGS No Sys 1 1 2 1 2 MECH-3 page 27 of 28 Date: 1/2/1996 COMPLY 24 User 2875 Economizer Type ---------------------------No Economizer No Economizer No Economizer No Economizer No Economizer Sys -------Heating ----------------------------------Cooling ----------No Type Output Aux KW EFF Type Output Sensible EER SEER ------_,_ -----------____ , __ -------------------------------- 1 Heat Pump 23000 0.0 6.80 DX 22600 16500 9.05 10.00 2 Heat Pump 29200 0.0 7.10 DX 28600 21450 9.70 11.00 3 Heat Pump 35200 0.0 6.60 DX 33600 25200 9.40 11.00 4 Heat Pump 41500 0.0 7.10 DX 40000 30000 9.90 11.00 5 Heat Pump 60500 0.0 7.40 DX 55000 41250 8.50 9.90 CENTRAL FAN SUMMARY------------Supply Fan-----------Return Fan Sys No Fan Type ---------------1 Constant Volume 2 Constant Volume 3 Constant Volume 4 Constant Volume 5 Constant Volume ZONAL FAN SUMMARY Space Name None Motor Location ---------------Draw-Through Draw-Through Draw.:..Through Draw-Through Draw-Through No CFM Mtr Drv Mtr Drv Eff Eff CFM BHP Eff Eff CFM BHP ----------- 800 0.16 1000 0.20 1200 0.24 1400 0.28 2000 0.39 Zonal Fan----- Mtr Drv BHP .Eff Eff ---------- 55 100 None 60 100 None 60 100 None 64 100 None 66 100 None -------Exhaust Fan Mtr No CFM BHP Eff Drv Eff MECHANICAL VENTILATION MECH-4 page 28 of 28 ------------------------·--------------------------------------------------Project Name: Dominie Press, Inc,. Documentation: Haynal & Co., Inc. Date: 1/2/1996 COMPLY 24 User 2875 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- VENTILATION SUMMARY BY SPACE Space Name Reception Hall(Landing) Office 102 Lunch 103 Hall/Restroom Office 201/202 Office 203/204 Office 205/206 Office 104 Offc 207/208/9 Hall/Restrooms Storage Manufacturing Order Process 104 Hall/Stairwe11- 0ffice T Occupancy Floor Area Lobby (General 868 Corridor/Res tr 465 Office 357 Dining Area 361 Corridor/Restr 156 Office 450 Office 462 Office 336 Office 140 Office 516 Corridor/Res tr 681 Industrial Sto 210 Industrial Wor 210 Office 255 Corridor/Restr 294 Office 165 sqft /Occ CFM Min /Occ CFM 29 15.4 460 200 30.0 40 143 21.5 54 29 15.4 191 200 30.0 23 143 21.5 68 143 21.5 69 143 21.5 50 143 21.5 21 143 21.5 77 200 30.0 102 500 75.0 32 100 15.0 32 143 21.5 38 200 30.0 44 143 21.5 25 Tran Design sfer CFM CFM 460 40 54 191 23 68 69 50 21 77 102 32 32 38 44 25 TOTALS 1326 1326 Note: If Tailored (T=*), user must document sqft/Occ and/or CFM/Occ values. "'f; ,. MANDATORY REQUIREMENTS ENVELOPE MANDATORY MEASURES (NONRESIDENTIAL) 1. Exterior manufactured doors, windows, and fenestration products shall meet the infiltration and U-value certification requirements of Section 116(a). 2. Site-constructed doors, skylights,.and windows shall be caulked and weather-stripped per Section 116(b). 3. All joints and openings which are potential sources of air leakage shall be caulked, gasketed, weather-stripped or otherwise sealed to limit infiltration and exfiltration per Section 117. 4. Certified insulation materials per Section 118(a). 5. Urea Formaldehyde foam insulation installed per Section 118(b). 6. lnsuJation installed to meet flame spread and smoke density requirements per Section 118(c). LIGHTING MANDATORY MEASURES 1. Each enclosed area sh~II have independent controls (per Section 131 (a) and exceptions). 2. Lighting shall be uniformly reducible by one half in areas which are greater than 100 sf, exceed 1.2 watts/sf, and have more than one luminaire (per Section 131 (b) and exceptions; exceptions include lights in corridors). 3. Daylitareas larger than 250 shhall be seperately controlled and uniformly reducible by one half (per Section 131 (c) and exceptions). 4. Seperately metered spaces 5,000 sf or greater shall have automatic shutoff controls (per Section 131 (e), no exceptions). 5. Display lighting shall be seperately switched on circuits that are 20 amps or less (per Section 131 (e), no exceptions). 6. Exterior lighting controlled from a lighting panel within the building shalrbe automatically controlled (per Section 131 (f) and exceptions). 7. Pairs of one-lamp and three-lamp fluorescent luminaires sha)I be·tandem-wired where reasonable (per Section 132 and exceptions). MECHANICAL AND PLUMBING MANDATORY MEASURES Equipment and Systems Efficiency 1. HVAC and service water heating equipment shall meet Appliance Efficiency Regulations, per Sections 111 and 112. 2. Piping, except those conveying fluids attemperatures between 60 and 105 degrees F, or within HVAC equipment, shall be insulated in accordance with Section 123. 3. Air handling duct systems shall be sealed in accordance with the SMACNA HVAC Ducts Construction Standards, Metal and Flexible, 1985, per Section 124(a) and (b). Ducts shall be installed and insulated as provided in UMC, Chapter 1 O. 4. Pilot lights shall not l;>e installed for natural gas central furnaces, and pool and spa heaters, per Section 115. Ventilation 1. Every space in a.building shall be designed to have outdoor air VE:!ntilation according to Section 121 (a), (b) and (e). 2. Operation and control of outdoor air shall meet the time-of-occupancy and pre-occupancy requirements of Section 121 (c). 3. When-a return plenum is used to distribute outdoor air to a covered HVAC unit, the ducted discharge shall be in accordance with Section 121 (d). 4. Systems shall meet the completion and balancing requirements of Section 121 (f). Controls 1. Each space conditioning zone shall be controlled by an individual thermostatic control that responds to temperature within the zone. Heating shall be adjustable down to 55 degrees or lower, and cooling shall be-adjustable up to 85 degrees or higher. The control shall provide a dead-band of5 degrees between heating and cooling, Section 122(a) and (b). 2. Heat pumps with supplementary electric resistance heaters shall have controls per Section 112(b). 3. Each space conditioning system shall be installed with an automatic time switch, able to shut off operation during off-hours of up to four hours, per Section 122(e)1. 4. Thermostat setup and setback controls are required if the summer design dry bulb temperature is more than 99 degrees F, or if the winter design temperature is less thari 33 degrees, per Section 122(e) 2, and its exceptions. 5. Outdoor air supply and exhaust equipment shall be installed with dampers that automatically close during periods of non-use for the areas served by the equipment, per Section 122(f). 6. Each space conditioning system serving multiple zones with a combined conditioned floor area more than 25,000 square feet shall be designed, installed, and controlled to serve isolation areas, per Section 122(g). SERVICE WATER HEATING SYSTEMS 1. Temperature controls and recirculating pump controls shall meet the requirements of Section 113(a) and (b). 2. F,low rates and temperature controls for public lavatories shall meet the requirements of Section 113(b)3. 3. Unfired service water heater storage tanks and backup tanks for solar water heating shall comply with Section 113(b)4. NON-RESIDENTIAL CERTIFICATE: Non-Residential Land Owner, please.read this option carefully and be sure you throughly understand the options before signing. The option you choose will affect your payment of the developed Special Tax assessed on your property. This option is available only at the time of the-first-blilding permit issuance. Property owner signature is required before a building permit will be issued. Your signature is confirming the accuracy of all parcel and ownership information shown . . RAY & CHRISTINE YUEN Name of Owner · 5945 PACIFIC CENTER BLVD •. STE 505 Address SAN DIEGO . CA 92121 City · State Zip Code . APN 212-092-0800 (619) 546-8899 Telephone 1949 KELLOGG AY Project Address Carlsbad CA City State Assessor's Parcel Number, or APN and Lot Number if not yet subdivided. CB951811 Building Permit Number s200 a Zip Code As cited by Ordinance No. NS-155 and adopted by the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, the City is authorized to levy a special Tax in Community Facilities district No. 1. All non-residential property, upon the issuance of the first blilding permit, shall have the option to (1) pay the SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT TAX ONE- 11ME or (2) assume the ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX-DEVELOPED PROPERTY for a period not to exceed twenty- five (25) years. Please indicate your choice· by initialing the appr~priate line. below: · OP110N (1 ): I elect to pay the SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT TAX ONE-11ME now, as a one-time payment. Amount_ Jh· ~"E,:r~e Special Tax: $ $49,263.05 Owner's Initials~ OP110N (2): I ·elect to pay the SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT TAX ANNUALLY for a period not to exceed twenty-five (25) years. Maximum Annual Special Tax: $ $6. 803, 22 . Owner Initials· ____ . I DO HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENAL TY OF PERJURY THAT THE UNDERSIGNED IS THE PROPERTY OWNER OF.THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND THAT r UNDERSTAND AND WILL COMPLY WITH THE PROVISIONS AS STATED AB VE. . . Title Print Name bate I I The City of Carlsbad has not independently verified the information shown above. Therefore, we accept no responsibility as to the accuracy or completeness of this information. NON-RESIDENTIAL CERTIFICATE CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE Cl TY OF CARLSBAD Plan Check DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING SERVICES DIVISION 2075 LAS PALMAS DR., CARLSBAD, CA 92.009 , ( 619) IJ38-1161 CB951811 No. This form shau' be used to determine the amount of school fees for a project and to verify that the project applicant has complied with the school fee requirements. No building permits for the projecl;s shail be issued until the certification is signed by the appropriate school district and returned to the Ci.ty of Carlsbad Building Department. SCHOOL DISTRICT: X Carlsbad Unified 801 Pine Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92009 ( 434-061 O) Endnitas Union · ,101 South Rancho Santa Fe Rd •. Encinitas, CA_ 92021* ( 619) g44-g300. Prc;,ject Applicant: RAY & CHRISTINE YUEN 1949 KELLOGG AV San Marcos Unified --·1290 West ·San Marcos Blvd. San Marcos, CA 9202lJ ( 744-4776) __ San Oieguito Union High School 71 O Encinitas Boulevard Encinitas, CA _92024_ (753-6491) APN: 212-092 -. 0800 Project Address:. RESIDENTIAL: SQ. FT. of living a·rea. number of dwelling units '-----------SQ. FT. of covered area ____ SQ. FT. of garage area _____ _ COMME:~CIAL/ INDUSTRIAL: SQ. FT. AREA 21,964 Prepared by -----------------------Date ______________ _ ------------" ---------. ---.------.---------------------------------------------. --. . · FEE CERTIFICATION ·· / (To be completed by _the School District) __ v_ AAmpplicant has complied with fee requirement under Government Code 53080 ___ Project is subject to an existing fee agreement ---~roject is exempt from Go.vernment Code 53080. Final Map approval and construction started before September 1, 1986. -----cother school fees paid) ___ Other------------------------------------- Residential Fee Levied: $ _____ based on ______ sq. ft.@ ____ ,_, __ _ sq. ft. @ ____ ~_<i?_~,--~/ 9~t s ' /- Sc;Jjool Distract O icial · itle Date AB 2926~1 ·tees ~re capped at $1 ~· 72 per square foo~ for residential. AB 2926~;e~u at .28 per square foot for commercial/industrial. ptJ9;;.<3 ~ 3/57-fS/e ?}'i'/75 1/19/95. -.~-ti?-,lc/_9._' ,· _9_o<.. ____ _ t, " .. P. 003 . ~S(MON) 12:41 DOMINIE PRESS INC· TEL:619-546-8822 CERTIFICATION .OF COMPLIANCE · CITY OF CARLSBAD -Plan Check DEVELOPMENT PROCESSINO· SERVICES OlVJS~ON _2075 LAS PALMAS DR., CARLSBAD, CA 9200-9 _ (619) !138-11-6~ . / . ______ __,, No .~er :; ,.. ·<9 ~ J~ "'--' //, \ t./ ,;/ ., / ' .) • # '/-- This form shall be used ·to determine the amount of school fees for_ a project arid ·to lerify that· the project applicant has complied with the school fee requirements. . No building permits for the projects shall be issued until the certification is signed by the appropriate ~chool district and returned· to the City of Carlsbad Building Department. SCHOOL DISTRICT: 1'-Carlsbad Unified 801 Pine Avenue Carlsbad,. CA 92009 (434-0610) Encinitas Union San Marcos Unified ---:1290 West San Marcas Blvd. San Marcos,. CA 92024 (7114-'1776) 101 South Rancho Santa Fe Rd •. Encinitas, CA.: 92024 ( 619) 9411-1300. Project ~pplicant: s·J"", \:~{ . ke,A __ San Dieguito Union High School 71 O Encinitas Boulevard Encinitas,. CA 92024 (753-6.491) APN(ZtZ.--OTt -Or~ Project Addr!!ss: \ q_ 4 C\ \:::: e.... l ( 03:3 RESIDENTIAL: SQ. FT. of living area _____ number of dwelling units ____ _ -; _ SQ. FT~ of covered o1rea ____ SQ. FT. of garage area _____ ..,. COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRl~L!SQ. ~j':'1Gj/ ;Jtr'fr~I/J-ctj/ ~ Prepared by 'f':'\. ~~ ~ Date 1 0 t..l0 ~j . ~----------------------------------~---------------------------------------~---------------- . FEE CERTIFICATION -(To be completed by the School District) ~pplicant has complied with fee requi~ement under Government Code 53080 ___ Project is subject to an ·existing fee agreement· ___ Project is. exempt from Government Code 53080 ' . ___ Final Map approval and construction started before September 1, 1986 • . (other school fees paid] -- ___ Other------------------------------ ------sq. ft. @-------- _l_o_, _(c_8'_7_-_ sq •. ft. '°-__.;;E). __ 8~=---- CITY OF CARLSBAD ---COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 SPECIAL TAX CALCULATION WORKSHEET FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF NON-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY .. PLEASE PRINT ON'E PER EACH BUILDING PERMIT' ••• BUILDING INITIALS:--------------------------· PLANNING IN I Tl A LS: -------------------------· ENGINEERING INITIALS: __________________ _ FINANCE INITIALS: DRAFT: ------------------------------------ FINAL,--------~---------- REQUIRED INFORMATION· BUILDING: 95',. iii/ A) PLAN CHECK NUMBER AND/OR BUILDING PERMIT NUMBER: B) PROPERTY OWNER(S) AS LISTED ON TITLE: C) ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER (S) OR APN ANO LOT NO'S FROM RECORDED FINAL MAP: 2.)2. -O'f-:l..-oi D) DESCRIPTION OF WORK: tJe,,..r Tl\iJ'i ""'"" l [gv\\d.1"'°' -r 7-' I Cf b J .f.f, ) l/ '- PLANNING.: 'S-7 -1 I ' E) DATE OF. INITIAL PARTICIPATION IN CFO: F) GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION(S): (BOXES PROVIDE FOR THREE DIFFERENT USES, EXPAND AS REQUIRED.) 1·F 1) Pl I F2) I F3) G) NET DEVELOPABLE ACREAGE THAT WILL REMAIN BY GENERAL PLAN USE AFTER THE STRUCTURE(S) IS BUILT: I G1) 0 Ad'G2) Ad G3) AO H) TY.PE OF LAND USE CREATED ·av THE ISSUANCE·OF THE BUILDING PERMIT: (FROM SPECIAL TAX TABLE) I H1). ,I/\Ju )mi>,.\ (O~tJ../Mq_,.,'t. /wo.r(>l)~~rei I ENGINEER.ING: I) SQUARE FEET OF BUILDiNG PER USE INDICA·TED IN (H) ABOVE: 111) d-/) °/{:;.J i~{~C) ~JI~)-//rib.-/ J) IMPROVEMENT AREA (CHECK ONE): ' ~ ,,,,/" ,.H3) 113) sad WITHIN THE STD -IMPROV_EMENT AREA I (1,/f OUTSIDE THE BTD -IMPROVEMENT AREA II ( K) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (REQUIRED ONLY WHEN G.ABOVE.,1~ ~f%'~.) PARCEL IIBJCIRCLE ONE)*---OF PARCEL MAP' _l.l41£~----1-N THE ·c::·1TY· oi=·cARLSi'a'AO, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFO~NIA, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDER ON __ :;s:___c-,,J.tj. __ 1-f,,. ____ /_'!t.-/f.S.. _________ . (IF THE ABOVE IS NOT ACECUAT.E A FULL LEGAL DESCRIPTION MUST BE ATTACH EC.) j BUiLCING: FINANCIAL PO.RTION TO BE FILLED OUT BY. MIKE PETE·RSON OR FAX TO BARBARA HALE 298-3783 FINANCE: L) SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT TAX -ONE-TIME, RATE PER SQUARE FOOT:(FROM SPECIAL TAX TABLE.) I ~1) ,~2) I ~3) M)SPECIAL TAX -ONE-_TIME (I x.L): ,~1) ,~2) 1~3) OBLIGATION FOR UPCOMING YEAR: IF THE PARCEL IS ISSUED A BUILDING P.ERMIT BETWEEN MARCH 2ND ANO JUNE 30TH, AN OBLIGATION FOR THE UPCOMING YEAR IS CREATED ANO WILL BE LEVIED IN THE FOLLOWING FISCAL YEAR. TOTAL PAYOFF OPTION 1: llsuM OF (M) ABOVE. THE SPECIAL TAX LIEN ON THIS PROPERTY, WHEN Cl-jOSING OPTION 1, WILL BE RELEASED WHEN ALL OUTSTANDING.OBLIGATIONS HAVE BEEN PAID IN FULL •. IF THERE IS A OBLIGATION FOR THE UPCOMING YEAR. UNDEVELOPED SPECIAL TAX WILL BE LEVIED IN THE UPCOMING FISCAL YEAR, AFTER PAYMENT OF WHICH THE LIEN WILL BE RELEASED. IF THERE IS ONLY THE CURRENT YEAR'S OBLIGATION OUTSTANDING, THE LIEN IS RELEASED WHEN BO.TH INSTALLMENTS HAVE BEEN PAID. IIOPTION 1: .• DISTRIBUTIQN OF PAYOFF: ACCOUNT NO. 430-810-1340-8032 .· PASS THRUOPTION 2: .. :.······ .. : llsuM OF (Ml ,t.BOVE TIMES 13.81 "· THE AMOUNT SHOWN IS THE MAXIMUM ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX· LEVIED FOR A PERIOD OF TWENTY-FIVE (2!5) YEARS. IF THERE IS AN OBLIGATION FOR THE UNPCOMING YEAR, THE SCF 'UPCOMING YE>.,R'S TAXES WILL REFLECT THE OBLIGATION OF UNDEVELOPED LANO TAX. THE TWENTY-FIVE YEAR ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX WOULD BEGIN IN THE FOLLOWING FISCAL YEAR. IIOPl:'ION 2: S R~:s~~:~Fl':;'J:k.,.'~6~i:,1M·~0·J~~-~P{Tci.·~~-~-NON-RESiDENTIAL°CER-Ti~1d~-T~-;..~liJ:~;~;j:}~~J:~;G;1J~·R:~· .. 6~:;HE ~~~~~RTv·. ;::.,.: .. WN . eietic:i'RE ·issu1N·o Ii 8U0ILDING ·PeR·,;uT. . :. . . .. :.·_· · .... ·.//·. '::_.:,:,,_..,:.::: · ··, · . . · .... ,· ... :, ·. • ... :i· .. ·. DISTRIBUTION: A COPY OF: FINAL CALCULATION SHEET, BUILDING PERMIT, ANO SIGNED CERTIFICATE A COPY OF: FINAL CALCULATION SHEET, BUILDING PERMIT, ANO SIGNE!;> CERTIFICATE A COPY OF: FINAL CALCULATION SHEET, ANO SIGNED CERTIFICATE ALL ORI.GINALS FEBRUARY 10, 1994 CFO NO. 1 INCOMING BOX FINANCE (HELGA) PROPERTY OWNER BUILDING PERMIT FILE VALID UNTIL ___________ _ I I .{ ti \·, ~ lft/f /cte/tJJ?J' /w I --'" ·] 97/tf'°// 1)0,.47 IN /tf!. /?~~ .. !_S • i .. ffelS' pu1,U(. ~ _,M,,._,ll,,.___M<ty (Cil"fSO'ilt) \,-----"' ~{ 4 /; ~ /f.l I L:: · ---- 11 J-1/F / . . / '.-/l,v.) ~ ~ ~ W (JA-/L ~ ~OVALS l . {JV/ ~<!.-~ o iJ L j1., e /},l'.-M fr' C,FII) f ,:JR_ I'\ . .t\a'J.~ 11 'h , · . U,j-··1· ..i:Leuodlng i . , [?-f !<-\fq f-(/friJ,J if H f c/.,J .J;}i&_, ./,:, }d,L ~ ,1-, c.=f_ • . '.;LJ~ :;~"'~::'~ ) .. J +' / 'l-1 r v-(J ~ .c; i"""") ~ -Iv s "'J s_eJ.,,.f (Jj ~ W"' ~ .,..,;/;J ,r,-P 1'1"""-' /.;/ '/ 'L rr~ n, ., .;Jg 1: . _''. Sk 1.vwd fre.-,CJA,JJt1~ ~ 1/1.s-frt'-~ v:J,f f~ j.eM 'ofl_;., ·--Coastal \ =~===Health .} ·: , ( ( r 1 ; /r-i l l Assoc. '· 'i. ·• ( L, 1;r lh vV I IC'LU, -l¥a QR) t ,. •I\ -• I• ' .: 1/z '>A1. ,,' ' (' ol ,.,._ iJ.-[J \ ·,0 (. . I f"-1 I <y,/4,,/ fee-. , -VS r 8-611..\-' p l~v<;:<, '7 ~e(J.., 'B D- <;; ,si e.. cl pe-r V\-,V '{ cant ---+----HAZMATFORM f',1~ .... t:_'-' '·i{ i o\e-& cd--1 '-- ~/1491,, &/'-::~ II~ Jo r;i\lALED ~ . ~~f::ct.~4Jl _~~~l~~M 1 ~ ~~---t----PLANCORR I ~ 'l:/J. ---;---ENGRGCORR \ ··r f l ,') ) ,I' :~\ )l l l;l ~ L ~ ---+----BUSUC ---+----WCOMP ----t----FIREPLANS .. ----t----ASSESSOR PLANS _ COFO , ctb / ! ( ' , .. , ;: : , '. :y~·--'":,;? ::::7 .•7:~~~~Fi'.':'""'~'.~'~'"~;:"rt~, =•·-~.:r~·r:-~:°" ==er'~·'"'~%'~,.-,,;,,,..-.~,.,.,,,. ... ,.,~.,;-,_,...,"'~-:·~ '.'.'~:~~ ' • 1 ~ ' ' , • ..,_,--, ~/' •' :• •/' ,_~ I 'f_, ·1:~--,-'-, ) :·~ - /·\,' --~ _;~~';:~·-.... :\::.~; ~; ,, ·<(" ,,s.:·.'., 'L I .• •.'c.icc ... 2 ....... ·. .. • "·. , B U I L D I N G og/17/96 11:34 Paqe 1 of 1 _ PCB. No: PC.8.960 5:: Pro~~ct-N9: A9S02651 Development.No: Job Address: 1949 KELLOGG AV Suite: _Permit Type: PLAN CHECK REVISION . 9735 09/J.7/96 000.1 01 . 02 Parcel No: 212-0.92-08-00 Lot#: . . · r •. :-r-,.;,~1.,,T , -,, 1 •f58.CO Valuation: · O Construction 'l'ype: · VN O.ccupancy Group: Reference#: C:S-951811 Status: ISSUED . . Description:. CREATE OFFICE #115 AT LOWER . ·_ Applied: .. 09/05/96 . : LEVEL AND REMOVE WALLS AT #207 UP:PER LEV· Apr/Iss-q;e: '09/17/96 ! . ..--• Entered By: RMA 619-444~2-+82 ;-;i))! 'APPROHAL f I ( . ,1., v-, ..l -------~ DATE---1 CITY OF CARl,.$BAD 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, ¢A 92009-_(619) 438-1161 KENNETH D. SMITH ARCHITECT & ASSOCIATESI INC. 435 W. BRADLEY AVE, SUITE C, EL CAJON, CA 92020 (619) 444-2182 FAX (619) 442-2699 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL TO HIKE PETERSON BUILDING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CARLSBAD COMMENT DATE JOB :I:* JOB ATTENTION FROM September 4, 1996 PLANCHECK# 95-461 DOMINIE PRESS (KELLOGG AVENUE) M. PETERSON DEAN SMITH MIKE -PLEASE TAKE A LOOK AT THE ATTACHED REVISIONS TO DRAWINGS: ,A5 ADDED NON-STl<UCTL. WALL UNDER EXISTING MEZZANINE TO FORM "BULLPEN OFFICE 175". A6 DELETED TWO NON-STRUCTL. OFFICE WALLS AT UPPER FLOOR ATTACHED ARE REVISED PLANS INCLUDING ANY CHANGE HADE TO ELECTRICAL $ MECHANICAL $ TITLE 24 ENERGY. /'H HOPING YOU CAN SPEED THIS THROUGH SINCE THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE READY FOi< FINAL INSPECTION IN APPROX. TWO WEEKS. PLEASE CALL HE WITH ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. COPY TO'-------------SIGNED DEAN SMITH DATE: 9/12/96 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 95-1811 Es.Gil Corporation Pr.ofessiona{ PCan ~view 'Engineers SE:T: REV PROJECT ADDRESS: 1949 Kellog Ave PROJECT NAME: Revision to Dominie Press Inc. ANT D FIRE D EVIEWER D FILE • The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. D The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's ********** codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. D The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. D The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: •. Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. D Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted: (by: D REMARKS: By: CHUCK MENDENHALL Esgil Corporation D GA D CM D EJ D PC ) Telephone #: Enclosures: 9/6/96 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (619) 560-1468 + Fax (619) 560-1576 ~/ VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PREPARED BY: CM BUILDING ADDRESS:1949 Kellog Ave PLAN CHECK NO.: 95-1811 REV DATE: 9/12/96 BUILDING OCCUPANCY: B TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN Sp ! BUILDING PORTION BUILDING AREA VALUATION VALUE (ft.2) MULTIPLIER ($) added office area 896 27 24138 . revised area 144 27 3888 Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAi,. VALUE 28026 • 1991 UBC Building Permit Fee D Bldg. Permit Fee by ordinance: $ 278.00 ii 1991 UBC Plan Check Fee D Plan Check Fee by ordinance: $ 180. 70 Type of Review: • Complete Review D Structural Only D Hourly D Repetitive Fee Applicable D Other: Esgil Plan Review Fee: $ 144.56 Comments: Fire Services Review: D Complete Review D Other: D Suppression System D FireAlarm Esgil Fire Services Review Fee: $ Comments: Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue.doc 5196 City of Carlsbad . 95074 r Fire Department • Bureau of Prevention Plan Review: Requirements Category: Building Pla.n Check Date of Report: Monday, September 16, 1996 Reviewed by: h.:t: ~J\ Contact Name Ken Smith Address 435 W. Bradley Av City, State . El Cajon CA 92020 Bldg. Dept. No. 95-1811 Planning No. Job Name Domiriie Press Inc Job Address _1_9_49_Ke_ll_og-g.,__ ___________ '--_ .Ste. or Bldg. No. ____ _ ~ Approved -The item you have submitted for review has been approved .. The approval is based on plans; information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes .to· these items after.this date, including field modifica- tions, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. D Disapproved -Please see the attached report of deficiencies. Please make corrections to plans or specifications necessary to indicate compliance with applicable codes and standatds. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. For Fire Department Use Only Review . 1st ·---2nd __ _ 3rd __ _ Other Agency ID CFD Job# _ _.:_95.:;._;0;:_;;_7__c.4 __ File# ___ _ 2560 Ori.on Way. • Carlsbad, California 92008 • (619) 931-2121 ·"' ;(~j ~\ .. ~.~ TITLE 24 REPORT FOR: Dominie Press, Inc. Keilogg Ave. Cc:trlsbad, CA PROJECT DESIGNER: Kenneth D. Smith Architect & Assoc. 435 W. Bradley Ave., Suite C El Cajon, CA 92020 (619)4,42-2182 REPORT PREPARED BY: Steve Balderrama Haynal & Co., Inc. 425 West Fifth Street Escondido, CA 92025 (619) 743-5408 Job Number: Date: 9/3/1996 The COMPLY 24 computer program has been used. to perform the calculations summarized in this compliance report. This program has approval and is ~ authorized by the California Energy Commission for use with both the Residential and Nonresidential Building Energy Efficiency Standards. ~ This program developed by Gabel Dodd Associates (510) 428-0803. \ ,~ I Table Of Contents for Title 24 Report ----------------------------------- Cover Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Table of Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Nonresidential Performance Title 24 Forms ........................... 3 Form ENV-3 Construction Assemblies .................................. 18 ·6194491003° 212 P02 SEP 04 '96 06:32 . . ' ? . i Sep-03-~6 05:3SP image l 619 442 2699 . :,-, -~llMANClil CBR1'11'XC'ATE OF ~PLI:ANCE (~a~t 1 of 3) PDF-1 pag• 3 of 20 ~un Initiation Time: 9:48:'60 Rwicode: 2875--555~61856 ... :½-. --------------------------~ --------·--------·-·--, ---------------. --. ------- --r.-cojec-t. Nal'II&: Domini• P.t"es-s, Inc. -IDa-te: 9/3/"l.~"96 , . Address: Kellogg Ave. I i. Carlsbad, c;.. I_B_u_i_l_d_i_n_g_P_,e_rm_i_t_N_o_ l: '----------·pesi~ar: Kemi•th D. Smith Architect:. , -Assoc·. jchecked by / Oa.te ,. I ~~•ntation: Hayn.al & Co., Inc:. fCOMPLY· 24 user 2s;.s r: --------------------------------------------------------------------·---- l. fj['ATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE 'nli~ Certific~te of Compli&ne• lists the Building fe~tures and performance jp~ifications needed to comply with Title 2~. Pares land 6, of the State Flding Code. Thie certificate applies only to a Building using the performance compliance approach. i: ~ ~incipal Designers hereby certify that the proposed building d~sign I'epre·sen,:;ed in che conat,:uction documents and modelled for this permit p~lication are consistent with all other forms and worksheets, specifi- i~tions, ilnd other calculai:ions submitted with this permit application. fhe propo~ed building as designed meets the energy efficiency requi~emencs ~f the Stace Building code, Ticle 24, Part 6, chapter 1. ! I t r \ t l hereby affirm that I am eligible under the provisions of Division 3 of th~ BUsiness and Profa~sions Code to si.gn this document as the person reeponsible for ita prep~.ration; .and that I am licensed as a civil engineer .. mec~anical engineer, electrical engineer or architect. 2: I affirm that I am eligible under the exemption to Division 3 of the 1 Business and Professions Code by Se~tion 5537.2 of the Susiness and J Professions Code t:"o-·aign this document a.s the person responsible for it:s I prepara~ion; and_chllt I am a licensed contractq_:r;-preparing documents for i· work that I ~ve contracted to perform. t :r affirm that I am eligible un.der the exemption to Division 3 of the ) 'Business and Professions Code by Section -~--of th~ _______ _ J _____ Code to sign this document as the person responsible for its j preparation; and for the following reason: _____________ _ ¥:<>PE OF COMPLIANCE (Designers aho~ld circle aFplicable paragraph numbers)" -~LOPE Required Fo~ms: ENV-l, "ENV-2 l. Location of ~dato-~~_,. ifiincipal Deeigner ~nneth D. Smith Arch~tect ~1'9)-H:2•2182 - L lf!GHT:WG - I·. . Itrincipal Designer ; -Required. Forms: LTG-l, LTG-2 Location of Mandatory Meaaures on Pl~s ae~o/#{ l 03 i f. (Signature) (Date} (Circle} !- ,.~CONICAL ~ Plrincipal Designer *•yton MbchanicAl (jS19.) 40-1272 : 1 ; J ,. MECH-2, MECH-3, MECH-" on Plan.e ____ _ P.02 ..• ; PERFORMANCE CERTIFICA~E OF COMPLIANCE {part 2 of 3) Run Initiation Time: 9:48:40 PERF-1 page_ 4 of 20 Runcode: 2875-555961856 ------___ , '---------------------------------------------------------------- Project Name: Dominie Press, Inc. Documentation: Haynal & Co., Inc. !Date: 9/3/1996 I !COMPLY 24 User 2875 ANNUAL SOURCE ENERGY USE SUMMARY {KBtu/sqft-yr) Energy Component Space Heating Space Cooling :):ndoor Fans Heat Rejection Pumps Domestic Hot Water Lighting Receptacle Process TOTALS GENERAL INFORMATION Conditioned Floor Area: Average Ceiling Height: Glass Area/ Wall Area: Average Glazing U-Value: Front Orientation: Number of Stories: Number of Zones: Number of Occupancies: o deg 6505 10.7 0.25 1.10 {N) 2 17 6 Standard Proposed Compliance Design Design Margin -------------------------- 7.61 8.76 -1.15 43.03 33.94 9.09 36.94 32.93 4.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 40.17 35.74 4.43 16.51 16.51 0.00 o.bo 0.00 0.00 -------------------------- 144.26 127.89 16.37 Compliance Method: COMPLY 24 v5.00 Location: Climate Zone: Carlsbad 7 ZONE INFORMATION Floor Display Inst Tailored Process Tailored Area Perim. LPD Lighting Loads Vent. Zone Name {sq.ft) {ft) {w/sf) {watts) {w/sf) (y/n) -----------------------..; ______ ----------------------------------- Reception 868 0 1.00 0 0 N Hall(Landing) 265 0 1.63 0 0 N Office 102 357 C) 0.91 0 0 N Lunch 103 361 0 1.20 0 0 N Hall/Restroom 105/6/112 156 0 0.94 0 0 N Office 201/202 450 0 1.44 0 0 N Office 203/204 462 0 1.17 0 0 N Office 205/206 336 0 1.29 0 0 N Offc 207/208/209 516 0 1.26 0 0 N Hall/Restrooms 210-212 681 0 1.07 0 0 N Storage 108 210 0 1.03 0 0 N Shrink Wrap 109 210 0 1. 03 0 0 N Order Process 104 255 0 1.69 0 0 N Hall/Stairwell 111 294 0 0.73 0 0 N Office 110 165 0 1.31 0 0 N Bullpen Office 919 0 1.53 0 0 N Warehouse 6094 0 0. oo .. 0 0 N ,'I. PERFORMANCE CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE (part 3 of 3) Run Initiation Time: 9:48:40 PERF-1 page 5 of 20 Runcode: 2875-555961856 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Project Name: Dominie Press, Inc. jDate: 9/3/1996 I Documentation: Haynal & Co., Inc. !COMPLY 24 User 2875 --------------------------------------------· ------------------------------ The documentation preparer hereby certifies that the documentation is accurate and complete. DOCUMENTATION AUTHOR Steve Balderrama (619) 743-5408 (Signature) ' EXCEPTIONAL CONDITIONS COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST (Date) The local enforcement agency should pay special attention to the items specified in this checklist. These items require special written · justification and documentation, and special verification to be used with the performance approach.. The local enforcement agency determines the adeql.iacy of the justification, and may reject a building or design that otherwise complies based on the adequacy of the special justification and documentation submitted. BUILDING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL OF EXCEPTIONAL FEATURES JUSTIFICATION: The exceptional features listed in this performance approach application have specifically been reviewed. Adequate written justification and documentation for their use have been provided by the applicant. authorized signature or stamp----'------------------ 'l CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE -Envelope Run Initiation Time: 9:48:40 ENV-1 page 6 of 20 Runcode: 2875-555961856 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Project Name: Dominie Press, Inc. !Date: 9/3/1996 I Documentation: Haynal & Co., Inc. !COMPLY 24 User 2875 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- OPAQUE SURFACES Assembly Name Demising Wall 6" Concrete Wall R-19 Roof(R.19 on Tile) FENESTRATION Frame Orient Panes Type -------- Front (N) 1 Metal Left (E) 1 Metal Back (S) 1 Metal Right (W) 1 Metal Const Type Location/Comments Wood None Wood Exterior Shade ----------------------- None None Nohe None OH N N N N Glazing Type Note to Field ----------------------- Greylite #14 Greylite #14 Greylite #14 Greylite #14 ' •l CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE~ Lighting Run Initiation Time: 9:48:40 Project Name: Dominie Press, Inc. Documentation: Haynal & Co., Inc. INSTALLED LIGHTING SCHEDULE No of Name Lamp Type Lamps ------------____ ,..._ Fluorescent 2 Fluorescent 3 Incandescent 1 MANDATORY AUTOMATIC CONTROLS Control watts/ Lamp ------ 34 34 75 Ballast Type ---------- Standard Standard n/a LTG-1 page 7 of 20 Runcode: 2875-555961856 jDate: 9/3/1996 I jCOMPLY 24 User 2875 Ballasts/ No of Note to Luminaire Fixt. Field ---------------- 1. 0 9 1. 5 65 n/a 3 Note to Control Location ID Control Type Zone Controlled Field CONTROLS FOR CREDIT Control Control Location ID Control Type Note to Zone Controlled Field CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE -Mechanical (part 1 of 3) MECH-:l-page 8 of 20 Run Initiation Time: 9:48:4.0 Runcode: 2875-555961856 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Project Name: Dominie Press, Inc. Documentation: Haynal & Co., Inc. SYSTEM FEATURES Zone Name HP-1 Time Control s ----Setback Control None #of Isolation Zones n/a HP Thermostat El·ectric. Heat Fan Control VAV Min Position Simtil. Heat/Cool Heat Supply Reset Cool Supply Reset Ventilation OA Damper Control Economizer Type Outdoor Air CFM Heat Equip Type Make & Model No. Cool Equip Type Make and Model Yes 0.0 KW Constant Volume n/a n/a Constant Temp Constant Temp B A No Economizer 969 Heat Pump Rheem RJKA-A060C DX Zone Name HP-3 Time Control __ s __ Setback Control None #of Isolation Zones n/a HP Thermostat Yes Electric Heat 0.0 KW Fan -Control VAV Min Position Simul. Heat/Cool Heat Supply Reset Cool Supply Reset Ventilation OA Damper Control Il!conomizer Type Outdoor Air CFM Heat Equip Type Make & Model No. Cool Equip Type Make and Model Code Tables Time Control S:Prog Switch O:Occ Sensor M:Man Timer Constant Volume n/a n/a Constant Temp Constant Tell_lp B ----A No Ij!conomizer 68 Heat Pump Rheem RJKA-A036 DX Ventilation B:Air Balance C:OA Cert. M.: OA Measure D:Demand Cont N:Nat:ural !Date: 9/3/1996 I !COMPLY 24 User 2875 HP-2 _s __ None n/a Yes 0.0 KW Constant Volume n/a n/a Constant Temp Constant Temp B ----A No Economizer 215 Heat Pump Rheem RJKA-A060C DX HP-4 s ----None n/a Yes 0.0 KW Constant Volume n/a n/a Constant Temp Constant Temp B ---- A ----No Economizer 120 Heat Pump Rheem RJKA-A060C DX OA Damper A:Auto G:Gravity Note to Field I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I '1. .. CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE -Mechanical (part 2 of 3) MECH-1 page 9 of 20 Run Initiation Time: 9:48:40 Runcode: 2875-555961856 Project Name: Dominie Press, Inc. Documentation: Haynal & Co., Inc. SYSTEM FEATURES Zone Name HP-5 Time Control __ s __ Setback Control None #of Isolation Zones n/a HP Thermostat Electric Heat Fan Control VAV Min Position Simul. Heat/Cool Heat Supply Reset Cool Supply Reset Ventilation OA Damper Control Economizer Type Outdoor Air CFM Heat Equip Type Make & Model No. Cool Equip Type Make and Model Code Tables Yes 0.0 KW Constant Volume n/a n/a Constant Temp Constant Temp B ---- A No Economizer 351 Heat Pump Rheem RJKA-A060C DX !Date: 9/3/1996 I !COMPLY 24 User 2875 HP-6 s None n/a Yes 0.0 KW Constant Volume n/a n/a Constant Temp Constant Temp B ---- A .No Economizer 180 Heat Pump Rheem RJKA-A060C DX Note to Field ---------~------------------------------------ Time Control S:Prog Switch O:Occ Sensor M:Man Timer Ventilation B:Air Balance C:OA Cert. M:OA Measure D:Demand Cont N:Natural OA Damper A:Auto G:Gravity . -(_ CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE -Mechanical (part 3 of 3) Run Initiation Time: 9:48:40 MECH-1 page 10 of 20 Runcode: 2875-555961856 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Project Name: Dominie Press, Inc. Documentation: Haynai & Co., Inc. !Date: 9/3/1996 I jCOMPLY 24 User 2875 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- DUCT INSULATION Duct Tape Insul Note to System Name Type Duct Location Allowed R-Val Field ---------------------·----------------------------------------- Rheem RJKA-A06.0C Heating Ducts in Attic y I N 4.2 Cooling Ducts in Attic y I N 4.2 Rheem RJKA-A060C Heating Ducts in Attic y I N 4.2 Cooling Ducts in Attic y I N 4.2 Rheem RJKA-A036 Heating Ducts in Attic y I N 4.2 Cooling D1,1cts in Attic y I N 4.2 Rheem RJKA-A060C Heating Ducts in Attic y I N 4.2 Cooling Ducts in Attic y I N 4.2 Rheem RJKA-A060C Heating Ducts in Attic y I N 4.2 Cooling Ducts in Attic y I N 4.2 Rheem RJKA-A060C Heating Ducts in Attic y I N 4.2 Cooling Ducts in Attic y I N 4.2 PIPE INSULATION Insul Note to System Name Pipe Type Required Field -------------------------------------------------- Domestic Hot Water y I N NOTES TO FIELD -Fo~ Building Department Use Only .1.. ,. ENVELOPE COMPLIANCE SUMMARY -Performance (part 1 of 3)ENV-2 page 11 of 20 Run Initiation Time: 9:48:40 Runcode: 2875-555961856 --------------------------------------------. ------------------------------ Project Name: Dominie Press, Inc. !Date: 9/3/1996 I Documentation: Haynal & Co., Inc. jCOMPLY 24 User 2875 GENERAL INFORMATION BY ZONE Flr Floor Display Zone Name Occupancy No Area Volume Perim. --. -------------------------------------------------------- Reception Lobby (Assembly) 1 868 18228 0 Hall (Landing) Corridor/Restroom 2 265 2385 0 Office 102 Office 1 357 3570 0 Lunch 103 Dining Area 1 361 3610 0 Hall/Restroom 105/6/112 Corridor/Restroom 1 156 1404 0 Office 201/202 Office 2 450 4050 0 Office 203/204 Offic~ 2 462 4158 0 Office 205/206 Office 2 336 3024 0 Offc 207/208/209 Office 2 516 4644 0 Hall/Rest.rooms 210-212 Corridor/Restroom 2 681 6129 0 storage 108 Industrial Storage 1 210 1890 0 Shrink Wrap 109 Industrial Work 1 210 1890 0 Order Process 10~ Office 1 255 2295 0 Hall/Stairwell 111 Corridor/Restroom 1 294 2646 0 Office 110 Office 1 165 1485 0 Bullpen Office Office 1 919 8271 0 Warehouse Unconditioned 1 6094 48752 0 Total 12599 . -(_ > ENVELOPE COMPLIANCE SUMMARY -Performance (part 2 of 3)ENV-2 page 12 of 20 Run Initiation Time: 9:48:40 Runcode: 2875-555961856 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Project Name: Dominie Press, Irie. !Date: 9/3/1996 I Documentation: Haynal & Co., Inc. jCOMPLY 24 User 2875 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- OPAQUE SURFACES Act Solar Type Area U-Val Azm Tilt Gains Form 3 Reference Location/Comments ------------------------------------------- Wall 261 0.752 0 90 Yes 6" Concrete Wall Reception Wall 273 0.752 90 90 Yes 6" Concrete Wall Reception Wall 777 0.095 Int 90 No Demising Wall Reception Roof 603 0.043 0 22 Yes R-19 Roof(R.19 on Tile) Reception Roof 265 0.043 0 22 Yes R-19 Roof(R.19 on Tile) Hall(Landing) Wall 248 0.752 0 90 Yes 6" Concrete Wall Office 102 Wall 80 0.752 270 90 Yes 6" Concrete Wall Office 102 Wall 216 0.095 Int 90 No Demising Wall Hall/Restroom 105/6/112 Wall 780 0.095 Int 90 No Demi$ing Wall Bullpen Office Wall 72 0.752 0 .90 Yes 6" Concrete Wall Office 201/202 Wall 25 0.752 270 90 Yes 6'" Concrete Wall Office 201/202 Roof 450 0.043 0 22. Yes R-19 Roof(R.19 on Tile) Office 201/202 Wall 129 0.752 270 90 Yes 6" Concrete Wall Office 203/204 Roof 462 0.043 0 22 Yes R-19 Roof(R.19 on Tile) Office 203/204 Wall 88 0.752 270 90 Yes 6" Concrete Wall Office 205/206 Roof 336 0.043 0 22 Yes R-19 Roof(R.19 on Tile) Office 205/206 Wall 72 0.752 0 90 Yes 6" Concrete Wall Lunch 103 Wall 137 0.752 270 90 Yes 6" Concrete Wall Lunch 103 Wall 228 0.095 Int 90 No Demising Wall Lunch 103 Wall 92 0.752 270 90 Yes 6'" Concrete Wall Storage 108 Wall 104 0.752 270 90 Yes 6" Concrete ·wall Shrink Wrap 109 Wall 116 0.752 270 90 Yes. ·6" Concrete Wall Order Process 104 Wall 168 0.095 Int 90 No Demising Wall Order Process 104 Wall 125 0.752 270 90 Yes 6" Concrete Wall Hall/Stairwell 111 Wall 68 0.752 270 90 Yes 6" Concrete Wall Office 110 Wall 312 0.095 Int 90 No Demising Wall Office 110 Wall 44 0.752 180 90 Yes 6" Concrete Wall Offc 207/208/209 Wa,ll 387 0.095 Int 90 No Demising Wall Offc 207/208/209 Roof 516 0.043 0 22 Yes R-19 Roof(R.19 on Tile) Offc :207/208/209 Wall 171 0. 7_52 180 90 Yes 6" Concrete Wall Hall/Restrooms 210-212 Wall 81 0.752 270 90 Yes 6" Concrete W~ll Hall/Restrooms 210-212 Wall 189 0.095 Int 90 No Demisip.g Wall Hall/Restrooms 210-212 Roof 681 0.043 0 22 Yes R-19 Roof(R.19 on Tile) Hall/Restrooms 210-212 ENVELOPE COMPLIANCE SUMMARY -Performance (part 3 of 3)ENV-2 page 13 of 20 Run Initiation Time: 9:48:4·0 Runcode: 2875-555961856 ---------------"----------------------------------------------------------- Project Name: Dominie Press, Inc. !Date: 9/3/1996 I Documentation: Haynal & Co., Inc. jCOMPLY 24 User 2875 FENESTRATION SURFACES SC Act Glass # Type Area Frame Div U-Val Azm Tilt Only Location/Comments 1 Wdw Front (N) 2 Wdw Left (E) 3 Wdw Front (N) 4 Wdw Right (W) 5 Wdw Front (N) 6 Wdw Front (N) 7 Wdw' Right (W) 8 Wdw Right (W) 9 Wdw Right (W) 10 Wdw Right (W) 11 Wdw Right (W) 12 Wdw Right (W) 13 Wdw Right (W) 14 Wdw Right (W) 15 Wdw Right (W) 16 Wdw Right (W) 1 7 Wdw Right (W) 18 Wdw Right (W) 19 Wdw Right (W) 2 0 Wdw Right (W) 21 W.dw Right (W) 22 Wdw Back (S) 96.0 Metal No 399.0 Metal No 64.0 Metal No 64.0 Metal No 96.0 Metal No 48.0 Metal No 200.0 Metal No 104.0 Metal No 64.0 Metal No 64.0 Metal No 64.0 Metal No 64.0 Metal No 27. O Metal No 24.0 Metal No 52.0 Metal No 64.0 Metal No 64.0 Metal No 24.0 Metal No 27. O Metal No 16. O Metal No 64.0 Metal No 64.0 Metal No 1.10 0 1.10 90 1.10 0 1.10 270 1.10 0 1.1.0 0 1.10 270 1.10 270 1.10 270 1.10 270 1.10 270 1.10 270 J:.10 270 1.10 270 1.10 270 1.10 270 1.10 270 1.10 270 1.10 270 1.10 270 1.10 270 1.10 180 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 0.52 Reception 0.52 Reception 0.52 Office 102 0.52 Office 102 0.52 Office 201/202 0.52 Office 201/202 0.52 Office 201/202 0.52 Office 203/204 0.52 Office 203/204 0.52 Office 205/206 0.52 Office 205/206 0.52 Lunch 103 0.52 Lunch 103 0.52 Storage 108 0.52 Storage 108 0.52 Shrink Wrap 109 0.52 Order Process 104 0.52 Order Process 104 0.52 Hall/Stairwell 111 0.52 Hall/Stairwell 111 0.52 Office 110 0.52 Offc 207/208/209 OVERHANGS/SIDE FINS --Window-- # Type Ht Wd -----Overhang------ Len Ht LExt RExt ---Left Fin--- Dist Len Ht ---Right Fin-- Dist Len Ht LIGHTING COMPLIANCE SUMMARY -Performance Run Initiation Time: 9:48:40 Project Name: Dominie Press, Inc. Documentation: Hayn.al & Co., Inc. LTG-2 page 14 of 20 Runcode: 2875-555961856 !Date: 9/3/1996 I !COMPLY 24 User 2875 -' ------------------------------. ------------------------------------------- ACTUAL LIGHTING POWER No of Watts Total Name Description Lumin per Default Watts ------------------------------------------------ 48 11 T-12 Low Watt /2 Lamp 9 72.0 y 648 --48" T-12 Low Watt /3 Lamp (Tandem) 65 10.8. 0 y 7020 --75 w Surface Mount Incandescent 3 75.0 y 225 -- SubTotal 7893 Less Control Credits (LTG-3) O Total Proposed Watts 7893 * If not CEC Default value, please provide supporting documentation. MODELLED LIGHTING POWER BY ZONE Modelled Floor LPD Total Tailored Zone Name Occupancy Area (w/sf) (watts) (watts) --------------------------------------------_____ ;;.. -------------- Reception Lobby (Assembly) 868 0.995 864 0 Hall (Landing) Corridor/Restroom 265 1.630 432 0 Office 102 Office 357 0.908 324 0 Lunch 103 Dining Area 361 1.197 432 0 Hall/Restroom 105/6/112 Corridor/Restroom 156 0.942 147 0 Office 201/202 Office 450 1.440 648 0 Office 203/204 Office 462 1.169 540 0 Office 205/206 Office 336 1.286 432 0 Offc 207/208/209 Office 516 1.256 648 0 Hall/Restrooms 210.,.212 Corridor/Restroom 681 1.066 726 0 Storage 108 Industrial Storage 210 1. 029 216 0 Shrink Wrap 109 Industrial Work 210 1. 029 216 0 Order Process 104 Office 255 1.694 432 0 Hall/Stairwell 111 Corridor/Restroom 294 0.735 216 0 Office 110 Office 165 1.309 216 0 Bullpen Office Office 919 1.528 1404 0 -------------------- TOTALS 6505 1.213 7893 0 * Note: Tailored Allotment requires supporting documentation on form LTG-4. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT ZONING SUMMARY -Performance Run Initiation Time: 9:48:40 MECH-2 page 15 of 20 Runcode: 2875-555961856 --------,-------------------------------, _________________________________ _ Project Name: Dominie Press, Inc. Documentation: Haynal & Co., Inc. SY$TEM/ZONING SUMMARY System/Zones Served Central/Zonal System !Date: 9/3/1996 I !COMPLY 24 User 2875 System Type No Sys HP-1 Rheem RJKA-A060C Packaged Heat Pump 1 Reception Hall(Landing) HP-2 Office 102 Hall/Restroom 105/6/112 Bullpep. Office HP-3 Office 201/202 HP-4 Office 203/204 Office 205/206 HP-5 Lunch 103 Storage 108 Shrink Wrap 109 Order Process 104 Hall/Stairwell 111 Office 110 HP-6 Offc 207/208/209 Hall/Restrooms 210-212 Warehouse Rheem RJKA-A060C Packaged Heat Pump 1 Rheem RJKA-A036 Packaged Heat Pump 1 Rheem RdKA-A060C Packaged Heat Pump l Rheem RJKA-A060C Packaged Heat Pump 1 Rheem RJKA-A060C Packaged Heat Pump 1 • 1'_ ' \ .. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SUMMARY -Performance Run Initiation Time: 9:48:40 Project Name: Dominie Press, Inc. Documentat~on: Haynal & Co., Inc. MECH-3 page 16 of 20 Runcode: 2875-555961856 jDate: 9/3/1996 I jCOMPLY 24 User 2875 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- CENTRAL SYSTEM S~Y Sys No System Name System Type No Sys Economizer Type 1 Rheem RJKA-A036 2 Rheem RJKA-A060C Packaged Heat Pu 1 No Economizer Packaged Heat Pu 5 No Economizer CENTRAL SYSTEM RATINGS Sys-------Heating~------~--------------------------Cooling----------- No Type Output Aux KW EFF Type Output Sensible EER SEER 1 Heat Pump 2 Heat Pump 37000 575.00 0.0 6.80 DX 0.0 6.80 DX 36000 57500 CENTRAL FAN SUMMARY ------------1?upply Fan ----------- Sys No Fan Type Motor Locaeion ------------------------------ 1 Constant Volume Draw-Through 2 Constant Volume Draw-Through ZONAL FAN SUMMARY ·zone Name No CFM None CFM BHP ------ 1200 2000 Zonal Fan Mtr BHP Eff 0.50 0.75 Drv Eff Mtr Drv Eff Eff 70 100 72 100 No CFM 26500 9.60 10.25 43000 9.50 10.00 Return Fan Mtr Drv CFM BHP Eff Eff ------ None None Exhaust Fan Mtr BHP Eff Drv Eff MECHANICAL VENTILATION -Performance Run Initiatioµ Time: 9:48:40 Project Name: Dominie Press, Inc. Documentation: Haynal & Co., Inc. MECH-4 page 17 of 20 Runcode: 2875-555961856 jDate: 9/3/1996 I jCOMPLY 24 User 2875 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- VENTILATION SUMMARY BY ZONE Zone Name T Occupancy ----------------------------------- Reception Hall(Landing) Office 102 Lunch 103 Hall/Restroom 105/6/112 Office 201/202 Office 203/204 Office 205/206 Offc 207/208/209 Hall/Restrooms 210-212 Storage 108 Shrink Wrap 109 Order Process 104 Hall/Stairwell 111 Office 110 Bullpen Office Lobby (Assembl Corridor/Restr Office Dining Area Corridor/Restr Office Office Office Office Corridor/Restr Industrial Sto Industrial Wor Office Corridor/Res tr Office Office Floor Area 868 265 357 361 156 450 462 336 516 681 210 210 255 294 165 919 sqft /Occ CFM Dsg /Occ CFM 29 15.0 449 200 30.0 40 :).40 20.0 51 29 15.0 187 200 30.0 23 140 20.0 64 140 20.0 66 140 20.0 48 130 25.0 99 200 30.0 102 500 75,0 32 100 15.0 32 140 20.0 36 200 30.0 44 140 20.0 24 130 15.0 106 Min CFM 929 40 54 181 23 68 69 50 77 102 32 32 38 44 25 138 TOTALS 1403 1901 Tran sfer CFM 480 0 3 0 3 3 2 0 0 2 0 1 32 WARNING -Total Design Mechanical Ventilation is less than Minimum Required Tailored OA (T=*) requires supporting documentation on MECH-5, Tailored Ventilation and Process Loads Worksheet PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ASSEMBLY ENV-3 page 18 of 20 -·------------------------------------------------------------------------- Project Name: Dominie Press, Inc. !Date: 9/3/1996 I Documentation: Haynal & Co., Inc. !COMPLY 24 User 2875 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ COMPONENT DESCRIPTION Assembly Name: Demising Wall Assembly Type: Wall Assembly Tilt: 90 deg (Vertical) Framing Material: Wood Framing Spacing: II 0.C. Framing Percent: 15.0 % Absorptivity: 0.70 Sketch of Construction Assembly Roughness: Brick, Plaster ASSEMBLY U-VALUE Construction Components Outside ~ir Film 1. Gypsum -or Plaster Board 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Insulat:i,on, Mineral Fiber, Gypsum or Plaster Board Inside Air Film Th R-Value Fr ( in) Cavity Frame 0.17 0.17 0.500 0.45 0.45 R-11 * 3.500 11. 00 3.46 0.500 0.45 0.45 0.68 0.68 _,_ ------. ----------------------. ----------. --------------------------------- Unadjusted R-Values 12.75 ADJUSTM~NT FOR FRAMING (i /12.75) X (0.85) + (1 / 5.21) X (0.15) Weight: m~at Capacity: 5.8 lb/sqft 1.70 0.095 TOTAL U-VALUE = TOTAL R-VALUE = 5.21 0.095 10.48 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ASpEMBLY Project Name: Dominie Press, Inc. Documentation: Haynal & Co., Inc. ENV-3 page 19 of 20 !Date: 9/3/1996 I !COMPLY 24 User 2875 -----------------------·--------------------------------------------------- COMPONENT DESCRIPTION I I I ,I I I I I I I I Sketch of Construction Assembly ASSEMBLY U-VALUE Construction Components Outside Air Film 1 . Concrete, 14·0 lb, Not Dried 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Inside Air Film Assembly Name: 6" Concrete Wall Assembly Type: Wall Assembly Tilt: 90 deg (Vertical) Framing Material: None Framing Spacing: "O.C. Fram~ng Percent: o.o % Absorptivity: 0.70 Roughness: Concrete, Asph. Shingles Th R-Value Fr (in) Cavity 6.000 0.17 0.48 0.68 Frame 0.17 0.48 0.68 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unadjusted R-Values 1.33 1.33 ADJUSTMENT FOR FRAMING (1 / 1.33) X (1.00) + (1 / 1.33) X (0.00) Weight: Heat Capacity: 70.0 lb/sqft 14.00 0.752 TOTAL U-VALUE = 0.752 TOTAL R-VALUE = 1.33 ===== PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ASSEMBLY Project Name: Dominie Press, Inc. Documentation: Haynal & Co., Inc. ENV-3 page 20 of 20 !Date: 9/3/1996 I jCOMPLY 24 User 2875 ----------------------------·---------------------------------------------- COMPONENT DESCRIPTION Sk~tch of Construction Assembly ASSEMBLY U-VALUE Construction Components Outside Air Film 1. Roofing, Built~Up 2. Membrane, Vapor-Permeable Felt 3. Plywood 4. Air Space 5. Insulation, Mineral Fiber, R:-19 6. Acoustical Tile, Interior Finish 7. 8. 9. Inside Air Film Assembly Name: R-19 Roof{R.19 on Tile) Assembly Type: Roof Assembly Tilt: 22 deg {Tilted Up) Framing Material: Wood Framing Spacing: II 0.C. Framing Percent: 10.0 % AI;>sorptivity: 0.70 Roughness: Concrete, Asph. Shingles Th Fr (in) 0.375 0.010 0.625 1.250 6.000 0.500 R-Value Cavity Frame 0.17 0.17 0.33 0.33 0.06 0.06 0. 77 0.77 0.75 0.75 19.00 19.00 1.43 1.43 0.61 0.61 ------------------------------------·-------------------------------------- Unadjusted R-Values 23.12 ADJUSTMENT FOR FRAMING (1 /23.12) X (0.90) + (1 /23.12) X (0.10) Weight: Heat Capacity: 4.9 lb/sqft 1.55 0.043 TOTAL U-VALUE = TOTAL R-VALUE = 23.12 0.043 23.12 MANDATORY REQUIREMENTS ENVELOPE MANDATORY MEASURES (NONRESIDENTIAL) 1. Exterior manufactured doors, windows, and fenestration products shall meet the infiltration and U-value certification requirements of Sectibn 116(a). 2. Site-construced doors, skylights, and windows shall be caulked and weather-stripped per Section 116(b). 3. All joints and openings which are potential sources of air leakage shall be caulked, gasketed, weather-stripped or otherwise sealed to limit infiltration and exfiltration per Section 117. 4. Certified insulation materials per Section 118(a). 5. Urea Formaldehyde foam insulation installed per Section 118(b). 6. Insulation installed to meet flame spread and smoke density requirements per Section 118(c). LIGHTING MANDATORY MEASURES 1. EaGh enclosed area shall have independent controls (per Section 131(a) and exceptions). 2. Lighting shall be uniformly reducible by one half in areas which are greater than 100 sf, exceed 1.2 watts/ sf, and have more than one luminaire (per Section 131(b) and exceptions; exceptions include lights in corridors). 3. Daylit areas larger than 250 sf shall be separately controlled and uniformly reducible by one half (per Section 131(c) and exceptions). 4. Separately metered spaces 5,000 sf or greater shall have automatic shutoff controls (per Section 131(d) and exceptions). 5. Display lighting shall be separately switched on circuits that are 20 amps or less (per Section 131(e), no exceptions). ·6. Exterior lighting controlled from a lighting panel within the building shall be automatically controlled (per Section 131(±) and exceptions). 7. Pairs of one-lamp and three-lamp fluorescent luminaires shall be tandem-wired where reasonable (per Section 132 and exceptions). SERVICE WATER HEATING SYSTEMS 1. Temperature controls and recirculating pump controls shall meet the requirements of Section 113(a) & (b). 2. Flow rates and temperature controls for pqblic lavatories shall meet the requirements of Section 113(b)3. 3. Unfired service water heater storage tanks and backup tanks for solar water heating shall comply with Section 113(b)4. MECHANICAL AND PLUMBING MANDATORY MEASURES Equipment and Systems Efficiency: 1. HV AC and service water heating equipment shall meet Appliance Efficiency Regulations, per Sections 111 and 112. 2. Piping, except those conveying fluids at temperatures between 60 and 105 degrees F, or within HV AC equipment, shall be insulated in accordance with Section 123. 3. Air handling duct systems shall be sealed in accordance with the SMACNA HV AC Ducts Construction Standards, Metal and Flexible, 1985, per Section 124(a) and (b). Ducts shall be installed and insulated as provided in UMC, Chapter 10. 4. Pilot lights shall .not be installed for natural gas central furnaces, and pool and spa heaters, per Section 115. Ventilation 1. Every space in a building shall be designed to have outdoor air ventilation according to Section 121(a), (b) and (e). 2. Operation and control of outdoor air shall meet the time-of-occupancy and pre-occupancy requirements of Section 121(c). 3. When a return plenum is used to distribute outdoor air to a covered HV AC unit, the ducted discharge shall be in accordance with Section 121(d). 4. Systems shall meet the completion and balancing requirements of Section 121(±). Controls 1. Each space conditioning zone shall be controlled by an individual thermostatic control that responds to temperature within the zone. Heating shall be adjustable down to 55 degrees or lower, and cooling shall be adjustable up to 85 degrees or higher. The control shall provide a dead-band of 5 degrees between heating and cooling. Section 122(a) and (b). 2. Heat pumps with supplementary electric resistance heaters shall have controls per Section 112(b). 3. Each space conditioning system shall ,be installed with an automatic time switch, able to shut off operation during off-hours of up to four hours, per Section 122(e)1. 4. Thermostat setup and setback controls are required· if the summer design dry bulb temperature is more than 99 degrees F, or if the winter design temperature is less than 33 degrees, per Section 122(e)2, and its exceptions. 5. Outdoor air supply and exhaust equipment shall be installed with dampers that automatically close during periods of non-use for the areas served by the equipment, per Section 122(±). 6. Each space conditioning system serving multiple zones with a combined conditioned floor area more than 25,000 square feet shall be designed, installed, and controlled to serve isolation areas, per Section 122(g).