The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1950 CAMINO VIDA ROBLE; ; CB980764; PermitBUILDING PERMIT 04/20/98 16:31 Page 1 of 1 Job Address: 1950 CAMINO VIDA ROBLE Suite Permit Type: ELECTRICAL Parcel No: Lot#: Valuation: 0 Occupancy Group: Reference*: Description: SITE ELECTRICAL/PARKING Permit No: CB980764 Project No: A9801010 Development No: 6231 04/20/98 0001 01 02 C-TOT 218-00 Construction Type: NEW Status: ISSUED Applied: 03/13/98 Apr/Issue: 04/20/98 Entered By: JM Appl/Ownr : LISI ROBERT 391 MURPHY CANYON ROAD SAN DIEGO CA 92123 *•* * Fees Required *** Fees : Adjustments: Total Fees: Fee description Other 619 565-8203 Collected & Credits *** .00 .00 218.00 Ext fee Data 218.00 PERMIT FEE FINAL APPROVAL HATF CLEARANCE. CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 y PERMIT APPLICATIONCITY'OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT2075 Las Patmas Dr., Carlsbad CA 92009(760)438-11611. PROJECT INFORMATION FOR OFFICE USE OPLAN CHECK NO.EST. VAL.Plan Ck. DepositValidated ByDateAddrns (include Bldg/Suitt») State/Zip . Telephone * Fax *Nsma 3.-r Address Contractor D Agent for Contractor ' Q Owner Name Address City State/Zip Telephone* Name S. CONTRACTOR • COMPANY NAME (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Coda: Any City or County which requires s permit to construct, after, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to flte a signed siatsment that he to Hesnsad pursuant to the previsions of the Contractor's License Law (Chapter 9, commending with Section.7000 of Division 3 of the Business end Professions Code) or that he to exempt therefrom, end the basis for the aHoged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant tor s permit subjects the applicant to s crvH penalty of not more than five hundred deters 1*6001). Name State License f Designer Name State License i 6. Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penefty of perjury one of the foBowmg dactoretions: D I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to serf-insure for worker*' compensation e* provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of ework for which this pKrnrt is issued. *r I have and will maintain workers' compensation, a* required by section 37OCTW the LabeTCode, tor the performance of the work for which this permit to d. My worker's compenMtion i»*»^ Comedy (THIS SECTION NEED NOTBE COMPLETED IF THE PEflMtT U FOR ONE HUNOflED DOLLARS I* 100) OR LESS) D CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performenee of the work for which this permit to Issued, I anaR not employ eny person In any manner so a* to become subject to the Workers' Com WARNING thousand. SIGNA 7. OWNER ws of CaHfomia. un eoneiaga to untewtul. and shei eubjsci an employer to eompeneelton. rlenisgn ee provioed tor In Section 370B of the _ _ - DATE peneKtes end cMI fines up to one hundred and enomey'i fee*. DECLAIttTION I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Lew for the following reason: D I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages es their sole compensation. wM do the work and the structure to not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who buJMe or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through hto own employees, provided that such Improvements are not Intended or offend for wto. If, however, the budding or Improvemem to sold within one year of completion, the owner*buHder wM have the burden of proving that he did not buNd or Improve for the purpoee of safe). Q I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Buameaa and Profesetone Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who buHda or improves thereon, end contracts for such protects wtth contraetorte) Inaneed pursuant to the Contractor's License Lew). D I am exempt under Section __^_^__ Business and Professions Code for this reason: 1. I personally plan to provide the major labor end meteneto for construction of the proposed property Improvement. Q YES QNO 2. I (have / have not) signed en application for a building permit for the proposed work. 3. I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed cwsuuciiun (Include name / address / phone number / connectors tesnss number): 4. I plan to provide portions of the work, but I hove hired the following person to coordmste. supsrvtos end provide the motor work ttnduds neme /1 number / contractors license number): 6. I win provide some of the work, but I have coniiaetsd (hired) the fallowing persons to provide the work Indtettsd (mduds neme / address / phone number / type of work): PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE COMPLETE THIS SECTrON fOnfHJfHifSnamM.^MMHQ PERMTfi OMM^i to the applicant or future building occupant required to submit e business pton, eeutary has* DATE rtsristo registration or rtok menegemem and prevention program under Sections 2BB05. 2BB33 or 28534 of the Presley Tenner Hasardous Substance Account Act? Q YES D NO Is the sppHcant or future building occupant recurred to obtain s rwmh from the sfr peJkitlon comrrf D YES Q NO Is the facility to be constructed wrihin 1,000 teat of the outar boundary of a school arts? Q YES D NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES. A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCWMC^ Wk\ HO^ K \9WKWLCK T^^I^MAHT HM MET OK IS WtE^mQ^W REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. *." CONSTRUCTION LENDWQ AGENCY ~"~~~ ^-^-r,^^^^^™^-,.,..^^ . .... .. .:.. _ I hereby affirm that there to e construction lending sgsncy tor the performance of the work for which this permit to tosuad (Sec. 309711) Civil Cede). LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information to correct end that the Information on the plane to accurate. I agree to comply with ad City ordinances and State laws relating to butting construction. I hereby authorita ism seat naU»ea of the Crr> of Cartebad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purpose.. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, WDEMNfFY AMD KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WMGtTftiXYHN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY M CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE OSHA: An OSHA permit ia required EXPIRATION: Every permit issued b work authorized by such permit to not commenced wfthrn ft65 days from the date of such permit or tMhs'buWmg w'w^rk atrtJorteedl^'su^^permll'to swp^dsd or abandoned at any time after the wprk is commenced for|a period of 180 day* (Section 106.4.4 Uniform Building Coda). excavations oveAB'O" deep end demolition or construction of structure* over 3 stories in height. • the Budding OffidaX under the provtokana of this Coda shell expire by Hmitstfon end become null end void if the building DATE WHITE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT* CB980764 FOR 07/08/98 DESCRIPTION: SITE ELECTRICAL/PARKING TYPE: ELEC JOB ADDRESS: 1950 CAMINO VIDA ROBLE APPLICANT: LISI ROBERT PHONE: CONTRACTOR: PHONE: OWNER: PHONE: INSPECTOR AREA TP PLANCK* CB980764 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE NEW STE: LOT: 619 565-8203 REMARKS: C/CLARKE/804-3869 INSPECTOR SPECIAL INSTRUCT: TOTAL TIME: —RELATED PERMITS—PERMIT* AS960024 RW960018 US960010 CB972975 CB973316 SE970222 AS970201 CB980644 AS980034 FS980014 WM980017 FS980025 CB980533 SE980050 RW980124 CB980783 TYPE ASC ROW TU MISC ITI SWOW ASC ITI ASC FIXSYS WMETER FIXSYS ITI SWRST ROW SIGN STATUS ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED CD LVL DESCRIPTION 39 EL Final Electrical ACT COMMENTS INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION ACT INSP 051898 Ftg/Foundation/Piers AP TP 051898 Steel/Bond Beam AP TP 050198 Underground/Conduit-Wiring AP TP COMMENTS PRK LOT LITES FTNS PRK LOT LIGHT CONDUIT U/G EsGll Corporation In Partners/Up -with government for 'Building Safety DATE: 4/9/98 a APPLICANT JURISDICTION: Carlsbad a PLAN REVIEWER Q FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 98-764 SET: II PROJECT ADDRESS: Lot 32, Owens Avenue PROJECT NAME: Parking Lot Development The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: V, / (by: ) Fax #: Mail Telephone rv-^ax In Person REMARKS: Resol&ion of handicap accessibility to sports court pending City review of enclosed letter. ' By: Eric Jensen Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA D CM D EJ D PC 4/2/98 tmsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 *• San Diego, California 92123 + (619)560-1468 + Fax (619) 560-1576 3914 MURPHY CANYON ROAD, SUITE A144 SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92123 619.565.8485 MILO ARCHTTECTUREGROUP ,-.*., *-,*• «nnA tt» «•» TT * * * **,*=** r * *-> * -n^-m *-..-*•» *FAX 565.8203 EMAIL MAG@MAGARCH.COM M EMO Date: 01 April 97 To: Building Department - Development Services City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Carlsbad, California 92008 From: Robert W. Lisi, ra / Project Manager Project: MAG# 970739 PSB Lending Corp. Lot 32 Owens Avenue - Parking Re: Clarifications for City of Carlsbad Plan Check Department No. CB980764 Comment 1 .B Show how an accessible route is provided from building to the Volleyball Court. The accessible route for the volleyball court, would travel this way: From the interior of the building, an individual would go out the main entrance and travel to the sidewalk on Camino Vida Roble; then travel east on Camino Vida Roble to the intersection of Camino Vida Roble and Owens Avenue. Then turn left (north) on Owens Avenue to the entry drive. Then turn left into the parking area. The travel across the parking lot to the volleyball court. The street and public sidewalk are exceeding the allowable slope of the accessible paths. Therefore the fix would entail the re-grading of the streets and sidewalks. The costs appear to be prohibitive. PSB Lending Corp. will have a series of policies in place to accommodate the access to the volleyball court. To support the accessibility, we are proposing the installation of a handicapped parking space next to the volleyball court. The aisle will protect the spectator. Note: The volleyball court will be a sand volleyball court. If there are concerns or questions please contact us as soon as possible Copies: Brenda Folstad, PSB Lending 040196. memo. 739 EsGil Corporation 2n {Partnership vfitA government for WuiOfaig Safety DATE: 3/25/98 a APPLICANT JURISDICTION: Carlsbad mO U-v*r* a PLAN REVIEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 98-764 SET: I PROJECT ADDRESS: Lot 32, Owens Avenue - PSB Lending Corp. PROJECT NAME: Parking Lot Development - Lot 32 The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. X The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. X The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Robert Lisi - 3914 Murphy Canyon Road San Diego, CA 92123 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. X Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Robert Lisi Telephone #: 565-3485 Date contacted: aj-zshs (by:#yc) Fax #: 565-8203 Mail u-Telephone Fax»^ In Person REMARKS: By: Eric Jensen Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA D CM D EJ D PC 3/17/98 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 * (619)560-1468 *• Fax (619) 560-1576 Carlsbad 98-764 March 25,1998 1. Provide the following information for the Parking Lot development on the plans: A) Complete details for (both of) the new stair construction. Include all pertinent architectural, structural, and handrail details. B) Show how an accessible route is provided from the building to the Volleyball Court. C) Provide pole base structural details. Note: If you have any questions regarding this electrical plan review list please contact Eric Jensen at (619) 560-1468. To speed the review process, note on this list ( or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans. VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 98-764 PREPARED BY: Eric Jensen DATE: 3/25/98 BUILDING ADDRESS: Lot 32, Owens Avenue - PSB Lending Corp. BUILDING OCCUPANCY: TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: BUILDING PORTION 2 hours plan check Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE BUILDING AREA (ft.2) VALUATION MULTIPLIER 2X $87.15 VALUE ($) $174.30 D 199 UBC Building Permit Fee D Bldg. Permit Fee by ordinance: $ D 199 UBC Plan Check Fee D Plan Check Fee by ordinance: $ Type of Review: [H Complete Review D Structural Only x Hourly O Repetitive Fee Applicable d Other: Esgil Plan Review Fee: $ 174.30 Comments: Sheet 2 of 3 macvalue.doc 5196 City of Carlsbad Engineering Department DATE: BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST PLANCHECK NO.: CB BUILDING ADDRESS: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to build. A Right-of-Way permit is required prior to construction of the following improvements: DENIAL Please see the- attached report of deficiencies marked with H/^ake necessary corrections to plans or specifications for compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. By: By: Date: Date: FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY ENGINtERINGJUJTHORIZATION TO ISSUE BUILDING PERMI1 Date: ATTACHMENTS Dedication Application Dedication Checklist Improvement Application Improvement Checklist Future Improvement Agreement Grading Permit Application Grading Submittal Checklist Right-of-Way Permit Application Right-of-Way Permit Submittal Checklist and Information Sheet Sewer Fee Information Sheet ENGINEERING DEPT. CONTACT PERSON Name: Michele Masterson City of Carlsbad Address: 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 Phone: (619)438-1161. ext. 4315 CFD INFORMATION Parcel Map No: Lots: Recordation: Carlsbad Tract: A-4 MM.OQC A Las Palmas Dr. * Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 • (619) 438-1161 • FAX (619) 438-O894 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST SITE PLAN 1. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: A. North Arrow D. Property Lines B. Existing & Proposed Structures E. Easements C. Existing Street Improvements F. Right-of-Way Width & Adjacent Streets G. Driveway widths Q 2. Show on site plan: A. Drainage Patterns 1. Building pad surface drainage must maintain a minimum slope of one percent towards an adjoining street or an approved drainage course. 2. ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE: "Finish grade will provide a minimum positive drainage of 2% to swale 5' away from building." B. Existing & Proposed Slopes and Topography G G 3. Include on title sheet: A. Site address B. Assessor's Parcel Number C. Legal Description For commercial/industrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, include: total building square footage with the square footage for each different use, existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing, warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved. EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE 4a. Project does not comply with the^follcwing Engineering Conditions of approval for Project No. O\P *iS—\/-i t *W . . Q Q Q 4b. All conditions are in compliance. Date: \LASPALMA8\SYStlBfMFWENaVWORCHDOCSlCHKLSTOulUlng Ptancheck Cklst BP0001 Form MM.doC ev. 09/03/B7 • • BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS * ST/ 2ND</ 3Rtv Q Q Q 5. Dedication for all street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the building site and any storm drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and for remodels with a value at or exceeding $ , pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.030. Dedication required as follows: Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8 %" x 11" plat map and submit with a title report. All easement documents must be approved and signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process. Submit the completed application form with the required checklist items and fees to the Engineering Department in person. Applications will not be accept by mail or fax. Dedication completed by: Date: IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS Q 6a. All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the construction exceeds $ , pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.040. Public improvements required as follows: Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public improvement requirements. A registered Civil Engineer must prepare the appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements on the attached checklist to the Engineering Department through a separate plan check process. The completed application form and the requirements on the checklist must be submitted in person. Applications by mail or fax are not accepted. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of building permit. Improvement Plans signed by: Date: Q Q Q ' 6b. Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title report or current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $ so we may prepare the necessary Future Improvement Agreement. This agreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building permit. Future public improvements required as follows: \\LASPAUUS&YS\LIBIURY£NaWORD\DOCSO4KlSlnBulkllng PttnchM* Ckbl BP0001 Form MM docRev. 09103/97 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST Asl-/ pnd/ ord/ Q Q a 6c. Enclosed please find your Future Improvement Agreement. Please return agreement signed and notarized to the Engineering Department. Future Improvement Agreement completed by: Date: Q Q Q 6d. No Public Improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or defective improvements found adjacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction of the City Inspector prior to occupancy. GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section 11.06.030 of the Municipal Code. Q Q Q 7a. Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading requirements. Include accurate grading quantities (cut, fill import, export). Write "No Grading" on plot plan if none is required. Q Q Q 7b. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer must be submitted together with the completed application form attached. NOTE: The Grading Permit must be issued and rough grading approval obtained prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Grading Inspector sign off by: Date: Q Q Q 7c. Graded Pad Certification required. (Note: Pad certification may be required even if a grading permit is not required.) Q Q Q 7d.No Grading Permit required. Q Q Q 7e.lf grading is not required, write "No Grading" on plot plan. MISCELLANEOUS PERMITSi Q Q Q 8. A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-Way and/or private work adjacent to the public Right-of-Way. Types of work include, but are not limited to: street improvements, tree trimming, driveway construction, tieing into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities. Right-of-Way permit required for: \lLASPALMAS\SYS\LIBRARYlENQ\WORDCOCS\CHKLSTWuWinQ PtancfMCk CWsl BPOOC1 Form MM.dOC Rev. 09/03/97 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST A st/ ond'/ ard/ Q Q Q 9. A SEWER PERMIT is required concurrent with the building permit issuance. The fee is noted in the fees section on the following page. Q Q Q 10. INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT If your facility is located in the City of Carlsbad sewer service area, you need to contact the Carlsbad Municipal Water District, located at 5950 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008. District personnel can provide forms and assistance, and will check to see if your business enterprise is on the EWA Exempt List. You may telephone (760) 438-2722, extension 153, for assistance. Industrial Waste permit accepted by: Date: Q Q Q 11. NPDES PERMIT Complies with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant shall provide best management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever occurs first. Q Q Q 12. Q Required fees are attached Q No fees required Q G Q 13. Additional Comments: \MASPALMAS\SVS\LIBRARYlENO\WORD\DOCS\CHKLS-neuWiflO PlMdMck Cktet BP0001 FOrni MM.dOCRev. 09/03/97 A preconstruction conference, should be held at the site with the developer, contractor, civil engineer, and soil engineer in attendance. Special soil handling and/or the grading-t plans can be discussed at that time. 3.4. Grading of the site should commence with the removal of any deleterious material from the area to be graded. All deleterious debris should be exported from the site and should not be mi ud with the fill soils. 3.5. Oversize materials, defined as material greater than 6 inches in maximum dimension, should be removed from the site and properly disposed. 4.0. Preliminary Pavement Recommendations 4.1. Laboratory tests on soil samples collected at the site indicate a resistance value (R-Value) of 22. The summary of the test results is presented in Table I in Appendix B. 4.2. The following table presents our preliminary pavement recommendations. It was assumed that the pavement surface will have automobile and light-duty truck traffic only and will not be subjected to heavy-duty truck traffic. The final pavement sections will be provided once the grading operations are completed and additional R-value tests are performed on soils exposed at subgrade elevation. TABLE 4.0. PRELIMINARY PAVEMENT SECTION Location Parking stalls Driveways Assumed Traffic Index 4.5 5.5 Assumed R-Value 22 22 Asphalt Concrete, (inches) 3.0 3.0 Class 2 Aggregate Base (inches) 5.5 8.5 4.3. The site should be scarified to a depth of at approximately 12 inches below the base course elevation, moisture conditioned to near optimum moisture content and compacted to at least 95 percent of maximum dry density as determined by ASTM Test Procedure D1557-91. Fill soils placed out of the indicated moisture content range may be considered unacceptable at the discretion of the geotechnical engineer. 4.4. Class 2 base should conform to Section 26-1.02B of the Standard Specifications for The State of California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). The base should be Project No. 05996-52-01 -4-October30, 1997 D D D D PLANNING DEPARTMENT BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST Plan Check No. CB Planner APN: Address Phone 1619) 438-1161, Type of Project & Use: Zoning: y4t^ Gei : iMrlftH w eneral Plan: Net Project Density: DU/AC -< Facilities Management Zone: _P CFD (in/out) #„ Circle One .Date of participation:Remaining net dev acres: (For non-residential development: Type of land used created by this permit: ) Legend: [^ Item Complete (M) Item Incomplete - Needs your action Environmental Review Required: YES NO TYPE DATE OF COMPLETION: Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: Discretionary Action Required: APPROVAL/RESO. NO. PROJECT NO. ft\? YES X NO DATE TYPE r OTHER RELATED CASES: Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of-Approval: D D Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance Project site located in Coastal Zone? YES NO CA Coastal Commission Authority? YES NO If California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact them at - 3111 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 200, San Diego CA 92108-1725; (619) 521-8036 Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt): Coastal Permit Determination Form already completed? YES NO If NO, complete Coastal Permit Determination Form now. Coastal Permit Determination Log #: Follow-Up Actions: 1) Stamp Building Plans as "Exempt" or "Coastal Permit Required" (at minimum Floor Plans). 2} Complete Coastal Permit Determination Log as needed. C3 O Inclusionary Housing Fee required: YES NO (Effective date of Inclusionary Housing Ordinance • May 21, 1993.) Data Entry Completed? YES NO (Enter CB ft; UACT; NEXT12; Construct housing Y/N; Enter Fee Amount (See fee schedule for amount): Return) Site Plan: DO 1. Provide a fully dimensional site plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way width, dimensional setbacks and existing topographical lines. DO 2. Provide legal description of property and assessor's parcel number. D D D D D D Zoning: 1. Setbacks: Front: Interior Side: Street Side: Rear: 2. Accessory structure Front: Interior Side: Street Side: Rear: Structure separation 3. Lot Coverage: * Reauired Required Required Required setbacks: Required Required Required Required : Required *Required Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Q 4- Height!Required Shown Q 5. Parking: Spaces Required Guest Spaces Required Additional Comments Shown Shown OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTE DATE City of Carlsbad Planning Department PLANNED INDUSTRIAL PERMIT/NON-RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PERMIT March 11, 1998 Catherine Cody Milo Architecture Group 3914 Murphy Canyon Rd Suite A144 California CA 92123 SUBJECT: PIP 95-06(A)/PUD 97-14 - PSB LENDING CORP. The City has completed a review of the application for a Planned Industrial Permit and Non-Residential Planned Unit Development Permit for the office conversion and associated parking lot development located on the north side of Camino Vida Roble, between Owens Avenue and Kellogg Drive, in Local Facilities Management Zone 5. It is the Planning Director's determination that the project IS consistent with the City's Planned Industrial Zone regulations (Chapter 21.34), the Non-residential Planned Unit Development regulations (Chapter 21.44) and with all other applicable City ordinances and policies. The Planning Director, therefore, APPROVES this request based on the following: Findings: 1. That the granting of this permit will not adversely affect and will be consistent with the City code, the General Plan, applicable specific plans, master plans, and all adopted plans of the City and other governmental agencies, in that the proposed project is consistent with the uses allowed under the General Plan and zoning of the property. 2. That the proposed use at the particular location is necessary and desirable to provide a service or facility which will contribute to the general well-being of the neighborhood and community, in that the proposed use is the type of use anticipated and called for under the General Plan and zoning. 3. That such project will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity, or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, in that the project is proposed as an office use which is consistent with the surrounding uses. 2075 Las Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92OO9-1576 • (76O) 438-1161 • FAX (76O) 438-O894 PIP 94-05(A)/PUD 97-14 ,'SB LENDING CORP. MARCH 11,1998 PAGE2 : 4. That the proposed non-residential planned development meets alt of the minimum development standards of the underlying zone in that no standards variances have been requested or are required. 5. The site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed use, and all yards., spaces, walls, fences, parking, loading, landscaping and other features required by this chapter, as shown on Exhibits "A" - "G", dated March 11, 1998. 6. The improvements indicated on the Planned Industrial Permit and Non- Residential Planned Unit Development are located in such a manner to be related to existing and proposed streets and highways, in that all circulation, drainage and grading matches up with existing improvements. 7. The improvements as shown on the Planned Industrial Permit and Non- Residential Planned Unit Development are consistent with the intent and purpose of this zone and all adopted development, design and performance standards as set forth in this chapter, in that all parking, landscaping, employee eating areas and other development standards are being met. Planning Conditions: 1. Approval is granted for PIP 94-05(A)/PUD 97-14 as shown on Exhibits "A" - "GH, dated March 11, 1998, on file in the Planning Department and incorporated herein by reference. Development shall occur substantially as shown unless otherwise noted in these conditions. 2. All uses established in this structure shall be consistent with Section 21.34.020 (Permitted Uses). 3. All roof appurtenances shall be shielded from view and architecturally integrated with the building design. 4. The Developer shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local ordinances in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 5. The Developer shall provide the City with a reproducible 24" x 36", mylar copy of the Site Plan as approved by the final decision making body. The Site Plan shall reflect the conditions of approval by the City. The Plan copy shall be submitted to the City Engineer and approved prior to Final Inspection or Certificate of Occupancy, whichever occurs first. PIP 94-05(A)/PUD 97-K PSB LENDING CORP, MARCH 11,1998 PAGE 3 . 6. The Developer shall pay the public facilities fee adopted by the City Council on July 28, 1987, (amended July 2, 1991) and as amended from time to - time, and any development fees established by the City Council pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code or other ordinance adopted to implement a growth management system or Facilities and Improvement Plan and to fulfill the subdivider's agreement to pay the public facilities fee, a copy of which is on file with the City Clerk.and is incorporated by this reference. If the fees are not paid, this application will not be consistent with the General Plan and approval for this project will be void. 7. This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures which are required as part of the Zone 5 Local Facilities Management Plan and any amendments made to that Plan prior to the issuance of building permits. 8. If any condition for construction of any public improvements or facilities, or the payment of any fees in-lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by law on this residential housing project are challenged this approval shall be suspended as provided in Government Code Section 66020. If any such condition is determined to be invalid this approval shall be invalid unless the City Council determines that the project without the condition complies with all requirements of law. 9. Prior to the issuance of the Final Inspection or Certificate of Occupancy, Developer shall submit to the City a Notice of Restriction to be filed in the office of the County Recorder, subject to the satisfaction of the Planning Director, notifying all interested parties and successors in interest that the City of Carlsbad has issued a Planned Industrial Permit on the real property owned by the Developer. Said Notice of Restriction shall note the property description, location of the file containing complete project details and all conditions of approval as well as any conditions or restrictions specified for inclusion in the Notice of Restriction. The Planning Director has the authority to execute and record an amendment to the notice which modifies or terminates said notice upon a showing of good cause by the Developer or successor in interest. 10. Trash receptacle areas shall be enclosed by a six-foot high masonry wall with gates pursuant to City standards. Location of said receptacles shall be approved by the Planning Director. Enclosure shall be of similar colors and/or materials to the project to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. PIP94-05(A)/PUD97-K PSB LENDING CORP. MARCH 11, 1998 PAGE 4 - 11. No outdoor storage of materials shall occur onsite unless required by the Fire Chief. In such instance a storage plan will be submitted for approval by the Fire Chief and the Planning Director. 12. The Developer shall prepare a detailed landscape and irrigation plan in conformance with the approved Preliminary Landscape Plan and the City's Landscape Manual. The plans shall be submitted to and approval obtained from the Planning Director prior to the approval of the Final Inspection or Certificate of Occupancy, whichever occurs first. The Developer shall construct and install all landscaping as shown on the approved plans, and maintain all landscaping in a healthy and thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris. 13. The first submittal of detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be accompanied by the project's building, improvement, and grading plans. 14. The applicant shall provide a minimum of one tree per every four parking spaces in the parking lot, in conformance with the Landscape Manual. Trees pertaining to this requirement shall be located within the parking area, exclusive of parking lot setbacks. 15. Prior to approval of Final Inspection or issuance of Certificate of Occupancy, all proposed and existing employee eating areas shall be enhanced to include, at a minimum, tables, chairs and trash receptacles, to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 16. Building identification and/or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing buildings so as to- be plainly visible from the street or access road; color of identification and/or addresses shall contrast to their background color. Engineering Conditions: 17. Prior to issuance of building permit, the property owner shall pay a one-time special development tax in accordance with City Council Resolution No. 91- 39. 18. The developer shall pay all current fees and deposits required. 19. Based upon a review of the proposed grading and grading quantities shown on the site plan, a grading permit for this project appears to NOT be required. PIP 94-05(A)/PUD 97-14 -. SB LENDING CORP. MARCH 11,1998 PAGES ; The applicant shall incorporate the site grading and drainage plan with the building plans for this project. 20. The proposed drainage system shall utilize three (3) inlets along the west side of this project. 21. The developer shall exercise special care during the construction phase if this project to prevent offsite siltation. Planting and erosion control shall be provided in accordance with the Carlsbad Municipal Code and the City Engineer. 22. The developer shall comply with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The developer shall provide best management practices as referenced in the "California Storm Water Best Management Practices Handbook" to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer. Said plans shall include but not be limited to notifying prospective owners and tenants of the following: A. AH owners and tenants shall coordinate efforts to establish or work with established disposal programs to remove and properly dispose of toxic and hazardous waste products. B. Toxic chemicals or hydrocarbon compounds such as gasoline, motor oil, antifreeze, solvents, paints, paint thinners, wood preservatives, and other such fluids shall not be discharged into any street, public or private,' or into storm drain or storm water conveyance systems. Use and disposal of pesticides, fungicides, herbicides, insecticides, fertilizers and other such chemical treatments shall meet Federal, State, County and City requirements as prescribed in their respective containers. C. Best Management Practices shall be used to eliminate or reduce surface pollutants when planning any changes to the landscaping and surface improvements. 23. The structural section for the access aisles must be designed with a traffic index of 5.0 in accordance with City Standards due to truck access through the parking area and/or aisles with an ADT greater than 500. The structural pavement design of the aisle ways shall be submitted together with required PIP 94-05(A)/PUD 97-14 - .-SB LENDING CORP. MARCH 11,1998 PAGE 6 • R-value soil test information and approved by the City as part of the building site review. If you have any questions, please call Michael Grim at (760) 438-1161, extension 4499. CITY OF CARLSBAD GARY/E. WAYNI Assistant Planning Director GEW:MG:mh c: Clyde Wickham Bobbie Hoder Cynthia Haas Data Entry File Copy City of Carlsbad 98127 Fire Department • Bureau of Prevention Plan Review: Requirements Category: Building Plan Check Date of Report: Monday, April 13.1998 Reviewed by:_ Contact Name Donna Ctark/Layton-BHUng Address 4440 Von Karman Av Ste 150 City, State Newport Beach CA 92660 Bldg. Dept. No. CB980764 Planning No. Job Name PSB Lending Tl Job Address 1950 Camino Vida Roble Ste. or Bldg. No. Approved - The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans; information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifica- tions, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. Disapproved - Please see the attached report of deficiencies. Please make corrections to plans or specifications necessary to indicate compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. 'or Fire Department Use Only eview 1 st 2nd 3rd Other Agency ID O Job# 98127 File* 2560 Orion Way • Carlsbad, California 92008 * (619) 931-2121 MlLO ARCHTIECTORE GROUP 3914 MURPHY CANYON ROAD, SUITE A144 SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92123 619.565.8485 FAX 565.8203 EMAIL MAG@MAGARCH.COM M EMO Date: To: 01 April 97 Building Department - Development Services City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Carlsbad, California 92008 From: Project: Re: Robert W. Lisi, ra / Project Manager MAG# 970739 PSB Lending Corp. Lot 32 Owens Avenue - Parking Clarifications for City of Carlsbad Plan Check Department No. CB980764 Comment 1.B Show how an accessible route is provided from building to the Volleyball Court. The accessible route for the volleyball court, would travel this way: From the interior of the building, an individual would go out the main entrance and travel to the sidewalk on Camino Vida Roble; then travel east on Camino Vida Roble to the intersection of Camino Vida Roble and Owens Avenue. Then turn left (north) on Owens Avenue to the entry drive. Then turn left into the parking area. The travel across the parking lot to the volleyball court. The street and public sidewalk are exceeding the allowable slope of the accessible paths. Therefore the fix would entail the re-grading of the streets and sidewalks. The costs appear to be prohibitive. PSB Lending Corp. will have a series of policies in place to accommodate the access to the volleyball court. To support the accessibility, we are proposing the installation of a handicapped parking space next to the volleyball court. The aisle will protect the spectator. Note: The volleyball court will be a sand volleyball court. If there are concerns or questions please contact us as soon as possible Copies:Brenda Folstad, PSB Lending O40196.memo.739 1 • J 1iJ1 , V\/V ,' h ^" w ^ ') o :t 1 ( R T IJ ! •> i >i i H ( - ii ! *> ' : H 1 p !< l •s ^ ' •• * K b r ) T *r 11 D E 0 c V 1 r - LIMITED GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PSB LENDING CORP PARKING LOT 32 OWENS AVENUE AND CAMINO VIDA ROBLE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA PREPARED FOR LAYTON-BELLING AND ASSOCIATES NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA OCTOBER 1997 ' GEOCON INCORPORATED GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS Project No. 05996-52-01 October 30, 1997 Layton-Belling and Associates 4440 Von Karman Avenue Suite 150 Newport Beach, California 92660 Attention: Ms. Donna Clark Subject: PSB LENDING CORP PARKING LOT 32 OWENS AVENUE AND CAMINO VIDA ROBLE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA LIMITED GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Ms. Clark: In accordance with our proposal No. LG-97377 with a revised date of October 21, 1997, we have provided geotechnical engineering services for the subject project. The scope of services included: 1. The review of aerial photographs of the site vicinity; 2. The review of the Geotechnical Report of Rough Grading Airport Business Centre, Unit 2, Carlsbad, California, dated April 21, 1993 prepared by ICG Incorporated; 3. The excavation of 5 shallow borings; 4. The performance of pertinent laboratory tests on selected soil samples collected from the soil borings; 5. The preparation of this report with recommendations for the grading and construction of the proposed parking lot. ' SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION The site consists of approximately 2.9 acres of land located south of the McClellan Palomar Airport approximately at the intersection of Camino Vida Roble and Owens Avenue in Carisbad, California. A site location map is provided as Figure 1. It is understood that the site was graded in 1993. The site was sheet graded with elevations varying from 264 feet above Mean Sea Level (MSL) on the north side of the pad to 250 feet MSL on the south. The vegetation consists of sparse weeds which have been recently disked. 6960 Flanders Drive • San Diego, California 92121-2974 • Telephone (619) 558-6900 • Fax (619) 558-6159 It is understood that project development .will consist of the construction of a parking lot to be used by employees and customers of the adjacent office buildings and businesses. Access to the site will be through two driveways, one located in the southeast corner of the site from Owens Avenue and the other in the southwest corner of the site from the adjacent parking lot. Review of the above referenced geotechnical report indicates that the site is a cut pad underlain by deposits associated with the Eocene-aged Santiago Formation. Review of the conceptual grading plan, entitled Preliminary Grading Plan For: Lot 32 of Carlsbad Tract No. 81-46, Map No. 11288, undated, by Spear and Associates, indicates that the site is essentially at grade and that any cuts or fills will be less than one foot. The lot will be paved with asphaltic concrete. To investigate the subsurface conditions at the site five, shallow, small-diameter borings were excavated at the approximate locations indicated on the Site Plan provided as Figure 2. The soils encountered during drilling were described and logged. The boring logs are provided in Appendix A. Soil samples collected were subjected to laboratory testing to evaluate the pertinent engineering properties. The results of the laboratory testing provided in Appendix A and B. SOIL AND GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS The soil type and geologic formation encountered during the investigation are discussed below in order of increasing age. Undocumented Fill An existing storm drain pipeline crosses the site along the western boundary. No borings were excavated in this area and no soil samples were collected. Geocon Incorporated has no opinion regarding the suitability of the trench backfill. Santiago Formation All of the borings excavated during this investigation encountered sediments associated with the Eocene-aged Santiago Formation. These sediments primarily consisted of dense, silty, fine sand. Stiff, sandy, clay was encountered in boring B 2; however, it is believed that this layer has a limited areal extent. Several chunks of highly cemented, fossiliferous sandstone were observed on the ground surface. These highly cemented layers, if present in the near surface, may impede ripping, generate oversize material, and require special handling. Project No. 05996-52-01 - 2 - October 30, 1997 RECOMMENDATIONS 1:0. General 1.1. No soil or geologic conditions were encountered during this limited geotechnical investigation, performed by Geocon Incorporated, that would preclude the development of the property as proposed provided that the recommendations of this report are followed. 1.2. The upper approximately 1 foot of the parking lot will require remedial grading consisting of scarification, moisture conditioning, and compaction. Also any debris, excessive plant material, and trash will need to be removed and disposed of off-site. 1.3. Large chunks of cemented sandstone may be generated during grading and will require special handling and placement. 1.4. Undocumented fill soils are associated with the existing storm drain pipeline located along the western boundary. The condition of these fill soils is unknown; however, our review of the preliminary plans indicates that these soils are primarily in landscape areas and will therefore have a minimal effect on the project as currently planned. 2.0. Soil And Excavation Characteristics 2.1. It is anticipated that the formational material can be excavated with moderate to heavy effort using conventional heavy-duty grading equipment. Oversize material in the form of cemented chunks and/or slabs of sandstone may be generated during excavation within portions of the Santiago Formation. Oversize rock or slabs should be broken so that no rock fragments greater than 6 inches in maximum dimension are placed in fills. 3.0. Grading 3.1. All grading should be performed in accordance with the Recommended Grading Specifications contained in Appendix C and the City of Carlsbad Grading Ordinance. Where the recommendations of this section conflict with Appendix B, the recommenda- tions of this section take precedence. 3.2. Representatives of Geocon Incorporated should observe and test all compacted fill placed at the site. Project No. 05996-52-01 -3 - October 30, 1997 3.3. A preconstruction conference, should be held at the site with the developer, contractor, civil engineer, and soil engineer in attendance. Special soil handling and/or the grading1 plans can be discussed at that time. 3.4. Grading of the site should commence with the removal of any deleterious material from the area to be graded. All deleterious debris should be exported from the site and should not be mi-fid with the fill soils. 3.5. Oversize materials, defined as material greater than 6 inches in maximum dimension, should be removed from the site and properly disposed. 4.0. Preliminary Pavement Recommendations 4.1. Laboratory tests on soil samples collected at the site indicate a resistance value (R-Value) of 22. The summary of the test results is presented in Table I in Appendix B. 4.2. The following table presents our preliminary pavement recommendations. It was assumed that the pavement surface will have automobile and light-duty truck traffic only and will not be subjected to heavy-duty truck traffic. The final pavement sections will be provided once the grading operations are completed and additional R-value tests are performed on soils exposed at subgrade elevation. TABLE 4.0. PRELIMINARY PAVEMENT SECTION Location Parking stalls Driveways Assumed Traffic Index 4.5 5.5 Assumed R-Value 22 22 Asphalt Concrete, (inches) 3.0 3.0 Class 2 Aggregate Base (inches) 5.5 8.5 4.3. The site should be scarified to a depth of at approximately 12 inches below the base course elevation, moisture conditioned to near optimum moisture content and compacted to at least 95 percent of maximum dry density as determined by ASTM Test Procedure D1557-91. Fill soils placed out of the indicated moisture content range may be considered unacceptable at the discretion of the geotechnical engineer. 4.4. Class 2 base should conform to Section 26-1.02B of the Standard Specifications for The State of California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). The base should be Project No. 05996-52-01 -4-October30, 1997 compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of the maximum dry density at near optimum moisture content. Asphalt concrete should conform to Section 203-6 of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction. 5.0. Site Drainage And Moisture Protection 5.1. Landscaping planters immediately adjacent to paved areas are not recommended due to the potential for surface or irrigation water to infiltrate the pavement's subgrade and "base course. We recommend that subdrains to collect excess irrigation water and transmit it to drainage structures, or impervious above-grade planter boxes be used. In addition, where landscaping is planned adjacent to the pavement, we recommended construction of a cutoff wall along the edge of the pavement that extends at least 6 inches below the base material. .. .. 5.2. Our experience indicates that even with the provisions presented in this report, an adverse groundwater condition could develop as a result of increased irrigation, landscaping, or surface runoff. A subdrainage system along the perimeter of pavement subgrade areas should be constructed to reduce the potential of pavement distress and subgrade failure due to infiltration and ponding of water within subgrade soils. The subdrain system should be designed to intercept irrigation water and surface runoff prior to entry into the pavement subgrade and carry the water to a suitable outlet. If you have any questions regarding this correspondence, or if we may be of further service, please contact the undersigned at your convenience. Very truly yours, GEOCON INCORPORATED Hoobs CEG1524 GWC:JH:dmc (2) Addressee (4) Milo Architecture Group Attention: Mr. Robert Lisi HOOBSNO. 1524 CERTIFIED ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST Project No. 05996-52-01 -5-October30, 1997 ^, s&Wf/3M e 1 <">«- HO --? <C,,. ^,v3w*L^ ;&„ * IK!i -Vi-j**" | feiia--l-Jf ' !»K|- s / r•,^, -I ** - -g ' J£ iwtSK "tiowiwE «/ /'6S|SKwt SOURCE: 1997 THOMAS BROTHERS MAP SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA REPRODUCED WITH PERMISSION GRANTED BY THOMAS BROTHERS MAPS. THIS MAP IS COPYRIGHTED BY THOMAS BROS. MAPS. IT IS UNLAWFUL TO COPY OR REPRODUCE ALL OR ANY PART THEREOF. WHETHER FOR PERSONAL USE ORRESALE. WITHOUT PERMISSION GEOCON INCORPORATED GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS 6960 FLANDERS DRIVE - SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92121 -2974 PHONE 619 558-6900 - FAX 619 558-6159 VICINITY MAP PSB PARKING LOT 32 CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA. GC/JS DSK/EOOOD DATE 10-30-1997 PROJECT NO.05996-52-01 FIG. 1 1V1CMAP 7. APPENDIX APPENDIX A FIELD INVESTIGATION The field investigation was performed on October 10, 1997, and consisted of a site reconnaissance and the excavation of 5 small-diameter borings. The borings were drilled to a maximum depth of approximately 5 1/2 feet using a CME-55 drill rig equipped with 6-inch, O. D., hollow-stem augers. Relatively undisturbed samples were obtained by driving the sampler 12 inches with blows using a 140-pound hammer falling 30 inches. The 3-inch-diameter split-tube sampler was equipped with 1- inch-high by 2Vs-inch-diameter brass sampler rings to facilitate sample removal and testing. Disturbed bulk soil samples were obtained from the ground surface. The soil conditions encountered in the exploratory excavations were visually examined, classified, and logged in general accordance with the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Practice for Description and Identification of Soils (Visual - Manual Procedure D2844). The logs of the exploratory borings/trenches are presented on Figures A-l through A-5. The logs depict the various soil types encountered and indicate the depths at which samples were obtained. The results of laboratory tests on selected soil samples to determine in-place density and moisture content are shown on the logs. Project No. 05996-52-01 October 30, 1997 PROJECT NO. 05996-52-01 DEPTH IN FEET - 2 - - -j SAMPLE NO. Bl-1 BI-2 1 1 >• O OX H -1 if! "l i . •if- ,'l I' >: T-j'l •(-" ' f? * i *3fLKc/P:#&/-. \.3. ITUJ <L a oceto SOIL CLASS <USCS) SM SM - BORING B 1 ELEV. (MSL.) 260 DATE COMPLETED 10/10/97 EQUIPMENT CME-55 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SANTIAGO FORMATION Loose, humid, tan, Silty, fine SAND, trace clay Dense, moist, greenish gray with orange mottling, Silty, fine SAND, trace clay Very dense, moist, reddish orange, Silty, fine SAND, shells BORING TERMINATED AT 5.5 FEET Z, i'-* H^U. HI-HQ • ^ 1 i t ^S1 1 1 •*• fft Q- ^ • 57 89 >_ H~ g^ " • £~a 118.1 ^^v* SH MtffEg u 10.2 Figure A-l Log of Boring B 1, page 1 of 1 PSBPL SAMPLE SYMBOLS D ... SAMPLING UNSUCCESSFUL C ... STANDARD PENETRATION TEST • ... DRIVE SAMPLE (UNDISTURBED) ^ ... DISTURBED OR SAG SAMPLE £ ... CHUNK SAMPLE I ... WATER TABLE OR SEEPAGE NOTE: THE LOG OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS SHOWN HEREON APPLIES ONLY AT THE SPECIFIC BORING OR TRENCH LOCATION AND AT THE DATE INDICATED. IT IS NOT WARRANTED TO BE REPRESENTATIVE OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND TIMES. PROJECT NO. 05996-52-0 \ DEPTH IN FEET 0 - 2 - ^ - t SAMPLE NO. B2-1 B2-2 1 1 >-CDO O M '•l!-'- T.j 1 •It- 15 • ~s - 'fa '$A -/-/ i rvLU H-<E OZ OccU) SOIL CLASS (USCS) SM CL - BORING B 2 ELEV. (MSL.) 260 DATE COMPLETED 10/10/97 EQUIPMENT CME-55 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SANTIAGO FORMATION Loose, humid, tan, Silty, fine SAND, trace clay Very dense, moist, dark gray, fine Sandy CLAY Very dense, moist, dark gray, fine Sandy CLAY BORING TERMINATED AT 5,5 FEET guj~°y>-|-ffu-o:£\ £wS2 UJH0 t^ ii-1 ^f1 1 1 T^T fflo."-*-^ - 100 74 > z t Q . >_a- Q 120.9 - - Q o:^ HyEg CJ 14.0 Figure A-2 Log of Boring B 2, page 1 of 1 PSBPL SAMPLE SYMBOLS D... SAMPLING UNSUCCESSFUL C... STANDARD PENETRATION TEST •... DRIVE SAMPLE (UNDISTURBED) 81 ... DISTURBED OR BAG SAMPLE B ... CHUNK SAMPLE I ... WAThS TABt-E OR SEEPAGE NOTE: THE LOG OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS SHOWN HEREON APPLIES ONLY AT THE SPECIFIC BORING OR TRENCH LOCATION AND AT THE DATE INDICATED. IT IS NOT WARRANTED TO BE REPRESENTATIVE OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND TIMES. PROJECT NO. 05996-52-01 DEPTH IN FEET * SAMPLE NO. B3-1 B3-2 , 1 1 >•CDo o H_J •:}|: "i -T•U-" i ' '-''' -i' {1: f-•'h-}:![- I1- V- ^,vV •"I • L''1 A* W' - • - r /r Q-UJ1-<r3Q ~1Oft:CD SOIL CLASS SM SM SM BORING B 3 ELEV. (MSL.) 260 DATE COMPLETED 10/10/97 EQUIPMENT CME-55 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SANTIAGO FORMATION Loose, humid, tan, Silty, fine SAND, trace clay Very dense, moist, reddish orange, Silty, fine SAND Very dense, moist, red with white, Clayey, Silty, fine SAND, gypsum, shells BORING TERMINATED AT 5.5 FEET o^Hyi-H-?U.<c£\£co« |u^ 0- ^ • " 58 81 >- S^ . oc^Q 115.1 - - ~ o;v ^gg u 11.4 Figure A-3 Log of Boring B 3, page 1 of 1 PSBPL SAMPLE SYMBOLS D ... SAMPLING UNSUCCESSFUL C ... STANDARD PENETRATION TEST • ... DRIVE SAMPLE (UNDISTURBED) H ... DISTURBED OR BAG SAMPLE B ... CHUNK SAMPLE € ... UATEft TABLE OR SEEPAGE NOTE: THE LOG OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS SHOWN HEREON APPLIES ONLY AT THE SPECIFIC BORING OR TRENCH LOCATION AND AT THE DATE INDICATED. IT IS NOT WARRANTED TO BE REPRESENTATIVE OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND TIMES. PROJECT NO. 05996-52-01 DEPTH IN FEET - 2 -1 - 4 SAMPLE NO. B4-1 B4-2 1 11 FHQLOGYH •|- 11 -i ."] J- "1 1 --1. !-" •H'/ T(: :!"] ll: I''-- i-•:V- 1 L -1 - . •• - - • n-JNDWATEo CO SOIL CLASS (USCS) SM SM SM - BORING B 4 ELEV. (MSL.) 260 DATE COMPLETED 10/10/97 EQUIPMENT CME-55 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SANTIAGO FORMATION Loose, humid, tan, Silty, fine SAND, trace clay Dense, moist, greenish gray with orange mottling, Silty, very fine SAND •- -- Dense, moist, greenish gray with orange mottling, Silty, very fine SAND BORING TERMINATED AT 5.5 FEET •RATIONSTANCEJS/FT.)5^&a.0---' • " 56 74 >- f-Q • £~a 116.3 - §: HK ^0u 15.3 Figure A-4 Log of Boring B 4, page 1 of 1 PSBPL SAMPLE SYMBOLS D... SAMPLING UNSUCCESSFUL L... STANDARD PENETRATION TEST 8§ ... DISTURBEU OR BAG f AMPLE B ... CHUNK SAMPLE ... DRIVE SAMPLE (UNDISTURBED) ... UATER TABLE OR SEEPAGE NOTE: THE LOG OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS SHOWN HEREON APPLIES ONLY AT THE SPECIFIC BORING OR TRENCH LOCATION AND AT THE DATE INDICATED. IT IS NOT WARRANTED TO BE REPRESENTATIVE OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND TIMES. PROJECT NO. 05996-52-01 DEPTH IN - 2 - ~ SAMPLE NO. B5-1 B5-2 THOLOGYH -1 'I '1-1-. 1 j 1 'I'- 1 •\ [ 1' "1 i -1 .1 -1- "V' * ' / ' ,1.[l- ]' I l|i.:\ [j- \ • \-:' f 1 -1-!1 rv LJNDWATEntrto SOIL CLASS SM SM SM BORING B 5 ELEV. (MSL.) 260 DATE COMPLETED 10/10/97 EQUIPMENT CME-55 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SANTIAGO FORMATION Loose, humid, tan, Silty, fine SAND, trace clay Very dense, moist, greenish gray orange mottling, Silty, fine SAND Very dense, green gray with orange mottling, Silty, fine SAND, trace clay BORING TERMINATED AT 5.5 FEET [RATIONSTANCEJS/FT.)^~ jj | "J1 1 1 ^T nt Q- w — 75 83 ufi" . £^a 117.8 - §: Hy§g u 14.2 Figure A-5 Log of Boring B 5, page 1 of 1 PSBPL SAMPLE SYMBOLS D ... SAMPLING UNSUCCESSFUL C ... STANDARD PENETRATION TEST • ... DRIVE SAMPLE (UNDISTURBED) S3 ... DISTURBfQ OR BAG SAMPLE B ... CHUNK SAMPLE I ... WATER TABLE OR SEEPAGE NOTE: THE LOG OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS SHOWN HEREON APPLIES ONLY AT THE SPECIFIC BORING OR TRENCH LOCATION AND AT THE DATE INDICATED. IT IS NOT WARRANTED TO BE REPRESENTATIVE OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND TIMES. APPENDIX B LABORATORY TESTING Laboratory tests were performed in accordance with generally accepted test methods of the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) or other suggested procedures. Selected soil samples were tested for their in-place density, in-place moisture content, and R-Value. The results of the laboratory R-Value tests results are presented as follows: TABLE B-l SUMMARY OF R-VALUE TEST RESULTS Sample No. R-l R-2 R-Value 26 22 ProjectNo. 05996-52-01 October30, 1997 APPENDIX C RECOMMENDED GRADING SPECIFICATIONS for PSB LENDING CORP, PARKING LOT 32 OWENS AVENUE AND CAMINO VIDA ROBLE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA PROJECT NO. 05996-52-01 RECOMMENDED GRADING SPECIFICATIONS 1. GENERAL 1.1. These Recommended Grading Specifications shall be used in conjunction with the Geotechnical Report for the project prepared by Geocon Incorporated. The recom- mendations contained in the text of the Geotechnical Report are a part of the earthwork and grading specifications and shall supersede the provisions contained hereinafter in the case of conflict. 1.2. Prior to the commencement of grading, a geotechnical consultant (Consultant) shall be employed for the purpose of observing earthwork procedures and testing the fills for substantial conformance with the recommendations of the Geotechnical Report and these specifications. It will be necessary that the Consultant provide adequate testing and observation services so that he may determine that, in his opinion, the work was performed in substantial conformance with these specifications. It shall be the responsibility of the Contractor to assist the Consultant and keep him apprised of work schedules and changes so that personnel may be scheduled accordingly. 1.3. It shall be the sole responsibility of the Contractor to provide adequate equipment and methods to accomplish the work in accordance with applicable grading codes or agency ordinance, these specifications and the approved grading plans. If, in the opinion of the Consultant, unsatisfactory conditions such as questionable soil materials, poor moisture condition, inadequate compaction, adverse weather, and so forth, result in a quality of work not in conformance with these specifications, the Consultant will be empowered to reject the work and recommend to the Owner that construction be stopped until the unacceptable con- ditions are corrected. 2. DEFINITIONS 2.1. Owner shall refer to the owner of the property or the entity on whose behalf the grading work is being performed and who has contracted with the Contractor to have grading performed. 2.2. Contractor shall refer to the Contractor performing the site grading work. 2.3. Civil Engineer or Engineer of Work shall refer to the California licensed Civil Engineer or * consulting firm responsible for preparation of the grading plans, surveying and verifying as- graded topography, 2.4. Consultant shall refer to the soil engineering and engineering geology consulting firm retained to provide geotechnical services for the project. 2.5. Soil Engineer shall refer to a California licensed Civil Engineer retained by the Owner, who is experienced in the practice of geotechnical engineering. The Soil Engineer shall be responsible for having qualified representatives on-site to observe and test the Contractor's work for conformance with these specifications. 2.6. Engineering Geologist shall refer to a California licensed Engineering Geologist retained by the Owner to provide geologic observations and recommendations during the site grading. 2.7. Geotechnical Report shall refer to a soil report (including all addendums) which may include a geologic reconnaissance or geologic investigation that was prepared specifically for the development of the project for which these Recommended Grading Specifications are intended to apply. 3. MATERIALS 3.1. Materials for compacted fill shall consist of any soil excavated from the cut areas or imported to the site that, in the opinion of the Consultant, is suitable for use in construction of fills. In general, fill materials can be classified as soil fills, soil-rock fills or rock fills, as defined below. * Soil fills are defined as fills containing no rocks or hard lumps greater than 12 inches in maximum dimension and containing at least 40 percent by weight of material smaller than 3/4 inch in size. + Soil-rock fills are defined as fills containing no rocks or hard lumps larger than 4 feet in maximum dimension and containing a sufficient matrix of soil fill to allow for proper compaction of soil fill around the rock fragments or hard lumps as specified in Paragraph 6.2. Oversize rock is defined as material greater than 12 inches. » Rock fills are defined as fills containing no rocks or hard lumps larger than 3 feet in maximum dimension and containing little or no fines. Fines are defined as material smaller than 3/4 inch in maximum dimension. The quantity of fines shall be less than approximately 20 percent of the rock fill quantity. 3.2. Material of a perishable, spongy, or otherwise unsuitable nature as determined by the e Consultant shall not be used in fills. 3.3. Materials used for fill, either imported or on-site, shall not contain hazardous materials as defined by the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 30, Articles 9 and 10; 40CFR; and any other applicable local, state or federal b.ws. The Consultant shall not be responsible for the identification or analysis of the potential presence of hazardous materials. However, if observations, odors or soil discoloration cause Consultant to suspect the presence of hazardous materials, the Consultant may request from the Owner the termination of grading operations within the affected area. Prior to resuming grading operations, the Owner shall provide a written report to the Consultant indicating that the suspected materials are not hazardous as defined by applicable laws and regulations. 3.4. The outer 15 feet of soil-rock fill slopes, measured horizontally, should be composed of properly compacted soil fill materials approved by the Consultant. Rock fill may extend to the slope face, provided that the slope is not steeper than 2:1 (horizontal:vertical) and a soil layer no thicker than 12 inches is track-walked onto the face for landscaping purposes. This procedure may be utilized, provided it is acceptable to the governing agency, Owner and Consultant. 3.5. Representative samples of soil materials to be used for fill shall be tested in the laboratory by the Consultant to determine the maximum density, optimum moisture content, and, where appropriate, shear strength, expansion, and gradation characteristics of the soil. 3.6. During grading, soil or groundwater conditions other than those identified in the Geotechnical Report may be encountered by the Contractor. The Consultant shall be notified immediately to evaluate the significance of the unanticipated condition. 4.-" CLEARING AND PREPARING AREAS TO BE FILLED 4.1. Areas to be excavated and filled shall be cleared and grubbed. Clearing shall consist of complete removal above the ground surface of trees, stumps, brush, vegetation, man-made structures and similar debris. Grubbing shall consist of removal of stumps, roots, buried logs and other unsuitable material and shall be performed in areas to be graded. Roots and other projections exceeding 1-1/2 inches in diameter shall be removed to a depth of 3 feet below the surface of the ground. Borrow areas shall be grubbed to the extent necessary to provide suitable fill materials. 4.£. Any asphalt pavement material removed during clearing operations should be properly disposed at an approved off-site facility. Concrete fragments which are free of reinforcing steel may be placed in fills, provided they are placed in accordance with Section 6.2 or 6.3 of this document. 4.3. After clearing and grubbing of organic matter or other unsuitable material, loose or porous soils shall be removed to the depth recommended in the Geotechnical Report. The depth of removal and compaction shall be observed and approved by a representative of the Consultant. The exposed surface shall then be plowed or scarified to a minimum depth of 6 inches and until the surface is free from uneven features that would tend to prevent uniform compaction by the equipment to be used. 4.4. Where the slope ratio of the original ground is steeper man 6:1 (horizontal:yertical), or where recommended by the Consultant, the original ground should be benched in accordance with the following illustration. TYPICAL BENCHING DETAIL FINISH GRADE REMOVE AS RECOMMENDED BY SOIL ENGINEER SLOPE TO BE SUCH THAT SLOUGHING OR SUDING DOES NOT OCCUR FINISH SLOPE SURFACE NOTE I NO SCALE DETAIL NOTES:(1) Key width "B" should be a minimum of 10 feet wide, or sufficiently wide to permit complete coverage with the compaction equipment used. The base of the key should be graded horizontal, or inclined slightly into the natural slope. (2) The outside of the bottom key should be below the topsoil or unsuitable surficial maters! and at least ?. feu into dense fonnational material. Where hard rock is exposed in the bottom of the key, the depth and configuration of the key may be modified as approved by the Consultant, 4.5. After areas to receive fill have been cleared, plowed or scarified, the surface should be » disced or bladed by the Contractor until it is uniform and free from large clods. The area should then be moisture conditioned to achieve the proper moisture content, and compacted as recommended in Section 6.0 of these specifications. 5. COMPACTION EQUIPMENT 5.1. Compaction of soil or soil-rock fill shall be accomplished by sheepsfoot or segmented1 steel wheeled rollers, vibratory rollers, multiple-wheel pneumatic-tired rollers, or other types of acceptable compaction equipment. Equipment shall be of such a design that it will be capable of compacting the soil or soil-rock fill to the specified relative compaction at the specified moisture content. 5.2. Compaction of rock fills shall be performed in accordance with Section 6.3. 6. PLACING, SPREADING AND COMPACTION OF FILL MATERIAL 6.1. Soil fill, as defined in Paragraph 3.1.1, shall be placed by the Contractor in accordance with the following recommendations: + Soil fill shall be placed by the Contractor in layers that, when compacted, should generally not exceed 8 inches. Each layer shall be spread evenly and shall be thoroughly mixed during spreading to obtain uniformity of material and moisture in each layer. The entire fill shall be constructed as a unit in nearly level lifts. Rock materials greater than 12 inches in maximum dimension shall be placed in accordance with Section 6.2 or 6.3 of these specifications. » In general, the soil fill shall be compacted at a moisture content at or above the optimum moisture content as determined by ASTM D1557-91. » When the moisture content of soil fill is below that specified by the Consultant, water shall be added by the Contractor until the moisture content is in the range specified. + When the moisture content of the soil fill is above the range specified by the Consultant or too wet to achieve proper compaction, the soil fill shall be aerated by the Contractor by b lad ing/mixing, or other satisfactory methods until the moisture content is within the range specified. * After each layer has been placed, mixed, and spread evenly, it shall be thoroughly compacted by the Contractor to a relative compaction of at least 90 percent. Relative compaction is defined as the ratio (expressed in percent) of the in-place dry density of the compacted fill to the maximum laboratory dry density as determined in accordance with ASTM D1557-91. Compaction shall be continuous over the entire area, and compaction equipment shall make sufficient passes so that the specified minimum relative compaction has been achieved throughout the entire fill. + Soils having an Expansion Index of greater than 50 may be used in fills if placed at least 3 feet below finish pad grade and should be compacted at a moisture content generally 2 to 4 percent greater than the optimum moisture content for the material. « Properly compacted soil fill shall extend to the design surface of fill slopes. To achieve proper compaction, it is recommended that fill slopes be over-built by at least 3 feet and then cut to the design grade. This procedure is considered preferable to track-walking of slopes, as described in the following paragraph. + As an alternative to over-building of slopes, slope faces may be back-rolled with a heavy-duty loaded sheepsfoot or vibratory roller at maximum 4-foot fill height intervals. Upon completion, slopes should then be track-walked with a D-8 dozer or similar equipment, such that a dozer track covers all slope surfaces at least twice. 6.2. Soil-rock fill, as defined in Paragraph 3.1.2, shall be placed by the Contractor in accordance with the following recommendations; * Rocks larger than 12 inches but less than 4 feet in maximum dimension may be incorporated into the compacted soil fill, but shall be limited to the area measured 15 feet minimum horizontally from the slope face and 5 feet below finish grade or 3 feet below the deepest utility, whichever is deeper. * Rocks or rock fragments up to 4 feet in maximum dimension may either be individually placed or placed in windrows. Under certain conditions, rocks or rock fragments up to 10 feet in maximum dimension may be placed using similar methods. The acceptability of placing rock materials greater than 4 feet in maximum dimension shall be evaluated during grading as specific cases arise and shall be approved by the Consultant prior to placement. * For individual placement, sufficient space shall be provided between rocks to allow for passage of compaction equipment. » For windrow placement, the rocks should be placed in trenches excavated in properly compacted soil fill. Trenches should be approximately 5 feet wide and 4 feet deep in maximum dimension. The voids around and beneath rocks should be filled with approved granular soil having a Sand Equivalent of 30 or greater and should be compacted by flooding. Windrows may also be placed utilizing an "open-face" method in lieu of the trench procedure, however, this method should first be approved by the Consulta'nt. + Windrows should generally be parallel to each other and may be placed either parallel to or perpendicular to the face of the slope depending on the site geometry. The minimum horizontal spacing for windrows shall be 12 feet center-to-center with a 5-foot stagger or offset from lower courses to next overlying course. The minimum vertical spacing between windrow courses shall be 2 feet from the top of a lower windrow to the bottom of the next higher windrow. » All rock placement, fill placement and flooding of approved granular soil in the windrows must be continuously observed by the Consultant or his representative. 6.3. Rock fills, as defined in Section 3.1.3, shall be placed by the Contractor in accordance with * the following recommendations: + The base of the rock fill shall be placed on a sloping surface (minimum slope of 2 percent, maximum slope of 5 percent). The surface shall slope toward suitable subdrainage outlet facilities. The rock fills shall be provided with subdrains during construction so that a hydrostatic pressure buildup does not develop. The subdrains shall be permanently connected to controlled drainays facilities to control post-construction infiltration of water. * Rock fills shall be placed in lifts not exceeding 3 feet. Placement shall be by rock trucks traversing previously placed lifts and dumping at the edge of the currently placed lift. Spreading of the rock fill shall be by dozer to facilitate seating of the rock. The rock fill shall be watered heavily during placement. Watering shall consist of water trucks traversing in front of the current rock lift face and spraying water continuously during rock placement. Compaction equipment with compactive energy comparable to or greater than that of a 20-ton steel vibratory roller or other compaction equipment providing suitable energy to achieve the required compaction or deflection as recommended in Paragraph 6.3.3 shall be utilized. The number of passes to be made will be determined as described in Paragraph 6.3.3. Once a rock fill lift has been covered with soil fill, no additional rock fill lifts will be permitted over the soil fill. * Plate bearing tests, in accordance with ASTM Dl 196-64, may be performed in both the compacted soil fill and in the rock fill to aid in determining the number of passes of the compaction equipment to be performed. If performed, a minimum of three plate bearing tests shall be performed in the properly compacted soil fill (minimum relative compaction of 90 percent). Plate bearing tests shall then be performed on areas of rock fill having two passes, four passes and six passes of the compaction equipment, respectively. The number of passes required for the rock fill shall be determined by comparing the results of the plate bearing tests for the soil fill and the rock fill and by evaluating the deflection variation with number of passes. The required number of passes of the compaction equipment will be performed as necessary until the plate bearing deflections are equal to or less than that determined for the properly compacted soil fill. In no case will the required number of passes be less than two. » A representative of the Consultant shall be present during rock fill operations to verify that the minimum number of "passes" have been obtained, that water is being properly applied and that specified procedures are being followed. The actual number of plate bearing tests will be determined by the Consultant during grading. In general, at least one test-should be performed for each approximately 5,000 to 10,000 cubic yards of rock fill placed. + Test pits shall be excavated by the Contractor so that the Consultant can state that, in his opinion, sufficient water is present and that voids between large rocks are properly filled with smaller rock material. In-place density testing will not be required in the rock fills. * To reduce the potential for "piping" of fines into the rock fill from overlying soil fill material, a 2-foot layer of graded filter material shall be placed above the uppermost lift of rock fill. The need to place graded filter material below the rock should be determined by the Consultant prior to commencing grading. The gradation of the graded filter material will be determined at ii:e tin:t; the rock fill is being excavated. Materials typical of the rock fill should be submitted to the Consultant in a timely manner, to allow design of the graded filter prior to the commencement of rock fill placement. All rock fill placement shall be continuously observed during placement by representatives of the Consultant. 7. OBSERVATION AND TESTING 7.1. The Consultant shall be the Owners representative to observe and perform tests during clearing, grubbing, filling and compaction operations. In general, no more than 2 feet in vertical elevation of soil or soil-rock fill shall be placed without at least one field density test being performed within that interval. In addition, a minimum of one field density test shall be performed for every 2,000 cubic yards of soil or soil-rock fill placed and compacted. 7.2. The Consultant shall perform random field density tests of the compacted soil or soil-rock fill to provide a basis for expressing an opinion as to whether the fill material is compacted as specified. Density tests shall be performed in the compacted materials below any disturbed surface. When these tests indicate that the density of any layer of fill or portion thereof is below that specified, the particular layer or areas represented by the test shall be reworked until the specified density has been achieved. 7.3. During placement of rock fill, the Consultant shall verify that the minimum number of passes have been obtained per the criteria discussed in Section 6.3.3. The Consultant shall request the excavation of observation pits and may perform plate bearing tests on the placed rock fills. The observation pits \vi!! bf excavated to provide a basis for expressing an opinion as to whether the rock fill is properly seated and sufficient moisture has been applied to the material. If performed, plate bearing tests will be performed randomly on the surface of the most-recently placed lift. Plate bearing tests will be performed to provide a basis for expressing an opinion as to whether the rock fill is adequately seated. The maximum deflection in the rock fill determined in Section 6.3.3 shall be less than the maximum deflection of the properly compacted soil fill. When any of the above criteria indicate that a layer of rock fill or any portion thereof is below that specified, the affected layer or area shall be reworked until the rock fill has been adequately seated and sufficient moisture applied. 7.4. A settlement monitoring program designed by the Consultant may be conducted in areas of rock fill placement. The specific design of the monitoring program shall be as recommended in the Conclusions and Recommendations section of the project Geotechnical Report or in the final report of testing and observation services performed during grading. 7.5. The Consultant shall observe the" placement of subdrains, to verify that the drainage devices t have been placed and constructed in substantial conformance with project specifications. 7.6. Testing procedures shall conform to the following Standards as appropriate: Soil and Soil-Rock Fills: + Field Density Test, ASTM D1556-82, Density of Soil In-Place By the Sand-Cone Method. + Field Density Test, Nuclear Method, ASTM D2922-81, Density of Soil and Soil-Aggregate In-Place by Nuclear Methods (Shallow Depth). * Laboratory Compaction Test, ASTM D1557-91, Moisture-Density Relations of Soils and Soil-Aggregate Mixtures Using 10-Pound Hammer and 18-Inch Drop. * Expansion Index Test, Uniform Building Code Standard 29-2, Expansion Index Test. Rock Fills * Field Plate Bearing Test, ASTM Dl 196-64 (Reapproved 1977) Standard Method for Nonrepresentative Static Plate Load Tests of Soils and Flexible Pavement Components, For Use in Evaluation and Design of Airport and Highway Pavements. 8. PROTECTION OF WORK 8.1. During construction, the Contractor shall properly grade all excavated surfaces to provide positive drainage and prevent ponding of water. Drainage of surface water shall be controlled to avoid damage to adjoining properties or to finished work on the site. The Contractor shall take remedial measures to prevent erosion of freshly graded areas until such time as permanent drainage and erosion control features have been installed. Areas subjected to erosion or sedimentation shall be properly prepared in accordance with the Specifications prior to placing additional fill or structures. 8.2. After completion of grading as observed and tested by the Consultant, no further excavation or filling shall be conducted except in conjunction with the services of the Consultant. 9. CERTIFICATIONS AND FINAL REPORTS 9.1. Upon completion of the work, Contractor shall furnish Owner a certification by the Civil Engineer stating that the lots and/or building pads are graded to within 0.1 foot vertically of elevations shown on the grading plan and that all tops and toes of slopes are within 0.5 foot horizontally of the positions shown on the grading plans. After installation of a section c? subdrain, the project Civil Engineer should survey its location and prepare an as-built plan * of the subdrain location. The project Civil Engineer should verify the proper outlet for the subdrains and the Contractor should ensure that the drain system is free of obstructions. 9.2. The Owner is responsible for furnishing a final as-graded soil and geologic report satisfactory to the appropriate governing or accepting agencies. The as-graded report should be prepared and signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer experienced in geotechuical engineering and by a California Certified Engineering Geologist, indicating that the geotechnical aspects of the grading were performed in substantial conformance with the Specifications or approved changes to the Specifications. GI rev. 9/96 APR. 21 ' 98 (TUB) 09:59 RENO CONTRACTING!PACE, 1/2 'MOP&ffl^ "' "'''" ' " "'""" "'" "* "' •''•'•••'•— ^Vly^"-'1 Willis Corioon Corporation of Can Dlago Insurance Cervices 1616 Murray Cyn. Bd. *90& * icon** #0413168 -*r> Di«Bo CA »210B j^JI*) 287-7111l*irfb«ce» R. Sul*«r , ARM IHiUHIB Rano Contracting, Inc. 1650 Hotel Circle North Suite 201 San Diego CA 92108 rliiiilil^iiiiii^ii n;™ : 'THIS CER1VICATE 1$ ISSUED AS A HATTER OF INFORMATION ONLV AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLPeft- THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE COMPANY lag Ion Insurance Company A COMPANY Cl SNA Iniurahott Company B COMPANY Framont Compensation Insurance Company C COMPANY DtcoViWilijiiSf^ WOICATED,NOTWITH8TANDINOANYRSOUIflKMCNTfTfiRMORCONDITK5NOF ANY CONTRACTOR OTHSflOOCUMENTWITHRElPBCTTOWHICHTHlSCEfiTlFlCAlEWAr BE ISSUaDOBMAYPEBTAIN.THENSURANCEAFFORDEDBY THE POLtClEftDiSCRBEDHEREiN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TCRMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVfi BEEN REDUCED BY PAO CLAIMS. COIT* A B I — ' C oT Tm OF MCUHANCI GINCftAL LIAIIUTV VlcOUMESCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY ~~~] CLAIMS MADE { X | OCCUR OWNERS & CONTRACIOR-S PRQI AUTOMMILILIAIH.ITT X ANY AUTO ALL OWNED AUTOS SCHEDULED AUTOS X HIRED AUTOS X : NON-OWNED AU1OS OAKACI HA»ft,ITT ANY AU1O •XCIMUAaiLITV 3UWBREII.A FORM OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM WOHKEH* COM«N»ATWN ANOIMn.0riR«'LIAah.lTY THE PBOPRIUOH/ wcl Ofl»IC€RS ARE; EXCL OVHtH POLJCirNUMIIft SL 102 4 0847 034 142944 WLKV BFFKTIVI 01-AUG-1997 01 -AUG. 1997 01-AUQ-1M7 PBLWTIXPttATION DAT! (MMJDD'YV) 01-AUO-1999 01-AUO-199S 01-AUO-1998 LIMITS Q£NE*UL AQQAE9ATI pRooucrS'Coup/op AGO PCRSONAL 4 AOV INJURY EACH OCCURMNCE ClAE OAUAOS (Any OM l^«) MEO CXP [An> on* p*riiMj COMfllWO S1NCW-E LIMIT BOOIL1I INJURY (P*« pvriwO BOOILV INJURY WWPERIY OAMAQl AUTO ONLY • PA ACCIDENT OIHEft WAN AUTO ONLY: EACH ACCIDENT A09RI9ATB iACH OCCURWNCE AOGREQATE y IWC ITAtJ.* linm nuns fgf1' EL E*CM ACCIOKNt fL PtSEAK-fOLiCV I WIT EL (MIASMA EMPLOYEE 5,000,001 B, 000,001 0.000,004 5,606,061 50,001 5,00 1 1,000,00< 1 s s * t s $ s 1 1.000,00 1 1,000,00 1 1.000,00 CKIPTION OF OPHIAVlbNIIUICATIOMatVIHICUWKHCIALITKM* RE: Al1 Operai ions •WOULD ANY 0F THE ABOVI M*CAI»IO POLICIH tt 6ANCEUJED 9tH>Kt TH< flPIRATION OATt THIKKOF. YMt »««UHO OOMMMY WHi (HMAVO» TO MAIL City of Car I*b*d 30 OATIwnrntN NOTIOI TO THE eiNTtFicATtHOLDH NAMIPTO IHI Lin, Aitn: Rl»k Management 207S La Palhiv Drive Carlsbad CA 92009 BUT FAlLUfl! TO MAM. *UW NOTKI "HALL M4POH NO BaUoATWN OF ANY KINO UPON THE COMPANY. IT! AOENTt OR fltPftE*CNTATlVfS. TOTRSn APR 21 .' 96 (TUE) 08:59 RENO CONTBACTJNO tJLJ.MK_PEl!!_ZMaitBtt^-.JJK. ^JtefctJ ltt> utJHihtr1 Va^T UMBIHW Vtff - PACE. 2/2 EMERGENCY CONTACTS I?£Nb. MATT i7?0 LINWOQD ST SAN PIEQO, Cft CORP. OFFICER R£NO CONTRACTING* INC. IfcEO HOTEL CIRCLE NORTH OS01 DIEGO, CA 92108 NO.leco&ss CITY OF CARLSBAD 1200 CARLSBAD VILLAGE Oft.. CARISBAD, CA 92008 BUSINESS LICENSE ISSUED TO (BUSINESS OWNER): RENO CONTRACTING, INC. 1*50 9 HOTEL CIRCLE NORTH #3<M SflN DIECO, CA 9E106 619-8SO-02£4 TO CONDUCT THE (9USINE3S CLASSIFICATION): GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS BUSINESS AS (DBA, BUSINESS NAME): - CONTRACTING, INC. (BUSINESS LOCATION): 1650 9 HOTEL CIRCLE NORTH SAN DIEfiO, CA 08/01/97 TO: 07/31/96 NQTTRANSFERABLE — POST IN A CONSPICUOUS PLACE LICENSE RESTRICTION: HOHE FEE-SCHEDULE PC80 SUBJECT TO REVOCATION BV THE CITY COUNCIL OF CAR LICENSE MUST BE POSTED BUSINESS PREMISES - ON NOTIFY BUSINESS LICENSE OFFICE IF rOU CHANCE LOCATION OR CEASE OPERATION. fe *">!iu g£ft M p « ffl/f ': . : *l e. :j i , f 3 i o 3^ 1 i£ilJ sse ^k^ ^ v^ 9 V V). v^Vu ^ ? -*<*\ °\ V) 5&O ) ^^ NS ^1 >^ ^ ^r^\\^ \^, ^ \ ^ ^ ^^ ?\^' ^rx.. ^=" |l ifiii W%£laS > ^ 4.. SO '