Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1954 KELLOGG AVE; ; CB950605; Permit'1 ',. I u *'tf • 12/.1~5/95 16·: 48 Page '-+ of 1 B U I L D I N G P E R M I T Permit No: CB950605 Project No: A9500894 Development No: Job Adclress: 1954 KELLOGG AV Permit type: INDUSTRIAL BUILDING Parcel No: 212-092-02-00 Suite: Lot#: 31.?~\ '1..2/J..3/iJS 0001 ~::. Valuation: 1,101,880 ;-. ,-·:,-., ... ~ Construction T3fpe•: Occupancy Group: B2 Reference#: Status: Description: 32000 TOTAL,10410 OFFICE,15070 Applied: : WHSE,6520 MFG.NO CONST OR INSP W/0 PAD C Apr/Issue: Appl/Owhr : DAILY, RAYMOND Entered By: 619=438-4442 2270 CAMINO VIDA ROBLE,STE 750 CARLSBAD, CA 92009 .~---...........___ VN,:,., .• ,-_ ISSUED 05/15/95 12/15/95 RMA CONTRACTOR RENO CONTRACTI~.,....--ti:-c~C 31370 619 462-7025 8104 COMMERCIAL S!,REET /r' f.\ /""-, LA MESA, CA/9~C:? < \_~/ ~ \ /.;? ~ -===---~~~=-Required_/:* -Qb: ***~_v-,.I{.,vft~r)~e _ t:d _:_~~=~~~~------::: Fees: 14!~ 21\. 80 / #?,~--k~(::: ;~\ \ Adjustments: I ~-~ .·O;:: P-JJ}1tf\ C'f..o"-cal czreeii;Ys t • 0 0 Total Fees: 144/2-~~ nf\lrotal Pavlften:ts~ 2,831.00 -f tr---.....~) . ~--•¢....__.,_-£,a.Jc:a'.n c\e ~U~A 141 4 3 8 8 0 Fee description/ ,..., / . --;;;:_:-;;--~7s ~FteL,.U.n,it E~t f~e Data -~r:~:~~~;~::i:::\ ~ ( ;~-,lt\ji(i-fir©]-1-----;HUC __ _ Enter Number of ED~' s -w1't)r~ . \i ~{, J1 '.,, / 1/ 18240. oo Enter "Y" to Autoca~c P.F.F-. ;/ ~01'~ I , 20054.00 Y Enter 'l'raffic Impact:, Fee.~ "'--f:-1 !Nto~PORAM,66 .3-r/ r--..... /1 4466. 00 Pass-Thru Fees(Y/N) Of ~cfi~~_9lW-l,? > 1952 / (\ \t>? , N Payoff Fee for CFD ~ ¼>( <JI f} ~-~!l~7-:t7?4-. M\) \., / 71772. 80 Enter Park Fee(Zone 5,1'3,"-16JJ;{ f7J~) /.~-1--Z<&,_9'0\~.) /' 12800.00 05 * BUILDING TOTAL ~ ~ U /:::, l O l\ 0 \) /-133741. 80 Enter "Y" for Plumbing Issue",~Fee v> ~'.) .J ~ 20. 00 Y Each Plumbing Fixture or Trap ...______..) ________ .....--20 7, 00 140. 00 Each Building Sewer > 1 15.00 15.00 Each Roof Drain > 5 7.00 35.00 Each Install/Repair Water Line > 1 7.00 7.00 Each Water Heater and/or Vent > 1 7.00 7.00 Gas Piping System > 1 7.00 7.00 Each Vacuum Breaker > 1 7.00 7.00 * PLUMBING TOTAL 238.00 Enter "Y" for Electric Issue Fee > 10.00 Y Three Phase 480 Per AMP > 800 1.00 800.00 * ELECTRICAL TOTAL 810,00 Enter 'Y' for Mechanical Issue Fee> 15.00 Y Install Furn/Ducts/Heat Pumps > 8 9,00 72.00 Each Exhaust Fan > 2 6.50 13.00 * MECHANICAL TOTAL 100.00 PLDA C ) 2.28 9380.00 H / r I PERMIT APPUCATION , City ot•carlsbalt Building Department 2075 Las Palms Dr., carlsbad, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 i. PERMtl '1WJ! From list 1 (see back) give code of Permit-Type: IN DtJ 0r For Residential Projects Only: From list 2 (see back) give Code of Structure-Type: ____________________ _ 1896 05/·i-.,-,,,.:jl~ ''""< -,. -\JiJ0.1. 01 C·-PRMT 02 2831."00 Net Loss/Gain of Dwelling Units ___________________ _ 2. PRClJF.Cf INFORMATION FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Address M~1 ~t-HDj~ Avt,. Nearest Cross Street Bu1idmg or Smte No. LEGAL DESCRIPTION Omt No. Phase No. Lr 5orrLnfo P/.1 Sv/ ·f.e 750 4?2..-'?/& !} ~:i 6 " ~~~~mefirst>A'lht' &>,;h-4-1~ Z'nc I ADDRESS 6/t:J4-&mmt,;n;I~/ gf_ CITY ta Mt~ STATE e1r. ZIP CODE q tt:J#-DAY TELEPHONE +b 2-1 d 2 f7 STATE UC. # '7 ,, 70 UCENSE CIASS ~ -/ CITY BUSINESS UC. # / 'Z, CJt) ~ 2,_ 'fi" OESIGNERNAME,(lastnamehrst)3'"n,;/h d~v/,4)1.9 4n:I,. ADDRESS 5~!!i5 Mro 5tJJ-rh# fl. 9v,'ft1!JO CITY ~h (}1 STATE ZIP CODE t::/ Z DAY TELEPHONE~-?J/8 STATE UC. # - Workers' Compensation DecJarat1on: I hereby affirm that I have a cernhcate of consent to self-insure issued by the Director of lndustnal Relations, or a certificate of Workers' Compensation Insurance by an admitted insurer, or an exact copy or duplicate thereof certified by ~ Director of the insurer th reof filed with tf Building in:~tion Departmen~tion 3800, Lab. C). INSURANCE ctJ/Zfv"l-~Frl,,Pll/'1 !(JdV>1ni YrouCY ~'f:f.r-'14-IJ(p"J/, EXP;;f~N DATE /!)-/-95' Cl Cl Cl cern at m pe ance o e wor or w 1s permit 1s 1ssu , s a not emp oy any person m any manner o the Workers' Compensation laws of California. Owner-Builder Declaration: I hereby athrm that I am exempt from the Contractofs License Law for the followmg reason: I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's license law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale.). I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's license law). I am exempt under Section _______ Business and Professions Code for this reason: (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish, or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's license law (Chapter 9, commencing with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars [$500)). SIGNATURE DATE COMPLETE ffits sEc't1oN FOR NON-RESIDEN l'IAC 8Ultb!NG PERMITS ONLY: ls the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 2550..5,, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? J C YES llif"NO Is the applicant or future building occupa~uired to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? Cl YES li")'ilO Is the facility to be constructed within l,QQO feet of the outer boundary of a school site? 0 YES li.t"'NO ---- IF ANY OF nm ANSWERS ARE YF5, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF CXIlJPANCY MAY NOT BE~ AFTER JULY 1, 1989 UNLESS nm APPUCANT HAS MET OR IS MEIITING nm REQUIREMENTS OF nm OFFICE OF EMERGENCY' SERVICFS AND nm AIR POIJ.UTION CDNTROL DISilUCT. 9. OONS'ikOClloN IJ.:NDING AGENCY I hereby afhrm that there IS a construction lendmg agency for the performance of the work for which thlS permit IS 1SSued (Sec 3097(1) C1V1l Code). LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS 10. APPUCAN I CfiltilFICA:hON I certify that I have read the apphcatlon and state that the above mformat1on 1s correct. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the City of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I AISO AGREE 10 SAVE INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS nm Cl1Y OF CARIS8AD AGAINST AIL IJAB~ JUDGMENTS, CDSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACXllUE AGAINST SAID C11Y IN CDNSEQUENCE OF nm GRANTING OF TIIIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. Expiration. Every permit issued by the building or work authorized by such pe ·t is such permit is suspended or abandoned at n APPUCANT'S SIGNATURE fficial under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the o commenced within 365 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by e after the work is commenced for a period of 180 days (Section 303(d) Uniform Bui!mng Qxlel.~ DATE: b•/~• Cf;) ile YFLLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance S E W E R P E R M I T 12/15/15 16l31 Page 1 of 1 Job Address: 1954 KELLOGG AV Permit Type: SEWER -OFFICE/WAREHOUSE Parcel No: 212-092-02-00 Description: OFFICE 3360 SF WAREHOUSE 22120 : SF, MANUF-6520 SF-SPRINKLERED Suite: Permitee: DAILY, RAYMOND 619=438-4442 2270 CAMINO VIDA ROBLE,STE 750 CARLSBAD, CA 92009 Sewer Fee Enter Sewer EDUs * SEWER.TOTAL Permit No: SE950044 Bldg PlanCk#: CB950605 51.79 12/15/95 ()00.1. 01 02 C-•n, 'r~i.,~lz.'-1 -! 'z ""-'A{ f, ~, •> -~ 1 .l.~~t'1>t'·"tiA} Status: ISSUED Applied: 05/16/95 Apr/Issue: 12/15/95 Expired: Prepared By: HE G r--------------...... i FINAL APPROVAL [INSP. ___ DATE ___ , CLEARANCE _____ , CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 CITY OF CARLSBAD J.: ~ I~SPEC'i'ION REQUEST PERMIT# CB950605 FOR 10/02/96 DESCRIPTION: 32000 TOTAL,10410 OFFICE,15070 WHSE,6520 MFG.NO CONST ,OR INSP W/O TYPE: INDUST PAD C INSPECTOR AREA TP PLANCK# CB950605 OCC GRP B2 CONSTR. TYPE VN JOB ADDRESS:· 1954 KELLOGG AV APPLICANT: DAILY, RAYMOND CONTRACTOR: RENO CONTRACTING OWNER: REMARKS: MW/GIL/PG 970-3977 SPECIAL INSTRUCT: FIRE WALL TOTAL TIME: --RELATED PERMITS-- CD LVL DESCRIPTION PERMIT# GR950019 SE950044 FS960002 AS960013 RW960087 TYPE GRADING swow FIXSYS ASC ROW STE: PHONE: 619=438-4442 PHONE: 619 462-7025 PHONE: STATUS ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ~CT COMMENTS LOT: 14 ST Frc1111e/Steel/Bol ting/Welding ./1L!._ 6£,{f./}44JL-, ->ct: ~ _. ----------,..'-----------'--~ .#FL/ ~/4('. ##~.0'.1L-~....V f#4LL; .L:L. _ ,4/ . -r"..:Z' 8d-f'P¢-'LL C~~ -------------'------------ ***** INSPECTION HISTORY***** DATE DESCRIPTION ACT INSP COMMENTS 093096 Interior Lath/Drywall AP TP 092696 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding AP TP 091996 Final Combo NS TP CORR NOT COMP 082396 Final Combo PI TP SEE INSP NOTES 080196 Compliance Investigation PI TP 080196 T-24 H-Cap Consultation PI TP 071896 Finai Combo co TP PRE WALLS 071896 Rough Electric AP TP SWITCH GEAR & SUBS,TRANS 071796 Final Combo PI TP 070596 Fram~/Steel/Bolting/Welding AP-TP T-BAR GRID 070596 Rough Electric AP TP CEILING LITES 070596 Rough/Ducts/Dampers co TP NOT COMPLETE 070296 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding co TP T-BAR 070~96 Rough/Topout co TP 070296 Rough Electric co TP CEIL LITES 070296 Rough/Ducts/Dampers co TP HVAC UNITS,DUCTS (SEE CARD) 061096 Interior Lath/Drywall ~p TP 060596 .Rough/Topout AP TP 060596 Walls AP TP TRSH ENCL 060496 Rough/Topout co TP TEST FAILED 060396 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding PA TP WALLS 060396 Rough Electric PA TP 053196 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding NR PK 053196 Rough/Topout NR PK 053196 Rough Electric NR PK CITY OF CARLSBAD ~ • INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT# CB950605 FOR 10/02/96 DESCRIPTION: 32000 TOTAL,10410 OFFICE,15070 WHSE,6520 MFG.NO CONST OR INSP W/O TYPE: INDUS'!' JOB ADDRESS: -1954 KELLOGG AV PAD C STE: INSPECTOR AREA TP PLANCK# CB950605 OCC GRP B2 CONSTR. TYPE VN LOT: ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION ACT INSP COMMENTS 05299(> Jnterior Lath/Prywall PA TP ONE SIDE STR C,LOBBY 052996 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding PA TP STR C,LOBBY,OFFICE ABOVE PROD 052896 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding PI TP LOBBY AREA HIGH WALLS 052496 Jnterior Lath/Drywall PA TP 1 HR CORR@ ENTRY 052496 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding PA TP 1 HR CORR@ ENTRY 052396 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding -PA TP 1 HR CORR LOBBY CEIL 052396 Interior Lath/Drywall AP TP 1 HR CORR LOBBY CEIL 0521.96 Ftg/Foundation/Piers AP TP PIERS FOR LOT LITES 051496 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding AP TP MEZ SHTING 051396 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding PA TP MEZ DECK SHTING 051~96 Ftg/Foundation/Piers A-P TP D.PACK@ ROOF CLMN FTNS 050696 Steel/Bond Beam AP TP TRK DOCK WALLS 042596 Roof/Reroof AP TP 04169-6 Ftg/Foundation/Piers AP TP *PANELS PND REPORTS 041696 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PA TP POUR STRIP 041596 Ftg/Foundation/Piers co TP NOT COMPLETE 032896 -F~ame/Steel/Bolting/Welding AP Tl? PANELS/SEE INSP NOTES 032696 .Ftg/Foundaticm/Piers AP TP CLMN@ TRUCK DOCK 032596 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding AP TP PANELS 032296 Shear Panels/HD's PA PK SEE INSP NOTES 031296 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PI TP FTNS + G.B. 030696 Ftg/Foundation/Piers A:P TP FTNS@ TRUCK DOCK WALLS 030596 Ftg/Foundation/Piers co TP NOT READY RAIN 022096 Ftg/Foundation/Piers AP PY 020796 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PA TP *ND REV FND PLN 020696 Ftg/Foundation/Piers co TP NOT COMPLETE 020596 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PI TP FTNS NOT COMP,CLN 020296 Ftg/Foundation/Piers NR TP RAIN 020196 Ftg/Foundation/Piers NR TP RAIN 013096 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PA TP PERMTR FTGS,ISO SPRD FTNS 0·12·395 Underground/Under Floor AP TP 0i2296 Unde~ground/Under Floor NR TP ND WATER TEST FINA~ BUILDING INSPECTION ,.<: If-...,. DEPT: BUILDING ENGINEERING FIRE ry~::C_lf(;s U/M ai..N CHECK#: CB950605 lrRMIT#: CB950605 · PROJECT NAME: 32000 TOTAL, 10410 OFFICE, 15.070 WATER DATE: 07/17/96 PERMIT TYPE: Cn{DUST~ -,...,,..,... ... ,.<C<--__........_- WHSE,6520 MFG.NO CONST OR INSP W/0 P~D C ADDRESS: CONTACT PERSON/PHONE#: ~-ClThZ["io..:·3:9-7 7 -··pG~-::-:::';::- SEWER DIST: CA WATER DIST: CA . . . ~-------?pl INSPEBTED ·. . BY: 1/. '..A""\... •i, DATE INSPECTED: 9 .. 'fJ..3-~PPROVED V DISAPPROVED - INSPECTED BY: INSPECTED BY: COMMENTS: DATE INSPECTED: DATE I.NSPECTED: APPROVED DISAPPROVED APPROVED DISAPPROVED . -~ ________ @) __ :2.._· ...... _C>_M-ff-u ..... c .... t ____ . ..,.fj..,.t1_t..e_)-_}C-\_b.e_l.e ___ J_,_· "-· _S._tzii,......,J. __ w ____ ~ __ >/,._-i __ c..A.... ____ __.l ..... 4_c-=._·_:11 '_c--. __ • ____ ~-- /~•-------------------------- FJ;:NAL BUILDING INSPECTION DEPT: ijUILDING ENGINEERING FIRE PLANNING ·V/M WATER PLAN CHECK#: CB950605 PERMIT#: CB950605 PROJECT NAME: 32000 TOTAL,10410 OFFICE,15070 WHSE,6520 MFG.NO CONST OR INSP W/O .ADDRESS: 1954 KELLOGG AV CONTACT PERSON/PHONE#: MW/GIL/970-3977 PG SEWER DIST: CA WATER DIST: CA INSPECTED BY: INSPECTED BY: COMMENTS: PATE INSPECTED: DATE INSPECTED: APPROVED APPROVED DATE: 07/17/96 PERMIT TYPE: INDUST DISAPPROVED DISAPPROVED FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION ~ -, DEPT: .BUILDING EN,GINEERING FIRE PLANNING U/M WATER PLAN CHECK#: CB950605 PERMIT#: CB950605 DATE: 07/17/96 PERMIT TYPE: INDUST PROJECT NAME: 32000 TOTAL,'.!-0410 OFFICE,15070 WHSE, 6520 MFG.NO CONST OR INSP W/0 PADC REcJ:w:t.t~'fi)--: r--_....,,;;;;,;''~~.:.,:-~" " I ADDRESS: ~954 KELLOGG AV CONTACT PERSON/PHONE#: MW/GIL/970-3977 PG SEWER DIST: CA WATER DIST: CA INSPECTED BY: INSPECTED BY: -INSPECTED BY: COMMENTS: DATE INSPECTED: DATE INSPECTED: DATE INSPECTED: -"·""'""'"1 1 J l JUL I 6 /996 f 1 CITY OF CARLSBAD j ,,,,,,,,,,==,,,.-;=~ DISAPPROVED APPROVED DISAPPROVED -APPROVED _DISAPPROVED FINA~ BUILDING INSPECTION .. DEPT: BUILDING ENQINEERING PLAN CHECK#: CB950605 PERMIT#: CB950605 FIRE PLANNING PROJECT NAME: ~2000 TOTAL,10410 OFFICE,15070 WHSE,6520 MFG.NO CONST OR JNSP W/O --------~-•·---,H~, ADDREss: ~r9.§:,i. .. mLOGG · Av--·: ------- CONTACT PERSON/PHONE#: MW/GIL/9-70-3977 PG SEWER DIST: CA WATER DIST: CA U/M INSPECTED~ BY: ~~~~ECTED: ~9'6 APPROVED ~ INSPECTED BY: INSPECTED BY: COMMENTS.: DATE INSPECTED: DATE INSPECTED: APPROVED APPROVED DISAPPROVED DISAPPROVED DISAPPROVED 2992 E. La Palma, Suite A ., ) Anaheim, California 92806 _ Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 COVERING WORK FOfh \_ 1t......e-oe-..r ARCHITECT c_ +--\-SQ'--( L ENGINEER L (4 E.a.. V l l CONTRACTO -MONTANA Testing & Geotechnical, Inc. FIELD REPORT AVAILABLE: SOIL REPORT (Y) (N) , APPROVED PLANS{D(N) FORWEE~ING _-.,:...,)..?J REPORT NO. PLAN FILE NO. PR.OJECT NAME ~! 1., y / r...1 DV S 7"Q2. I RrL ADrR~S gf.1'~9JEcv _ t . . '1 !,<f ~, p REPORTING REQUIREMENTS: ICBO FIELD INSPECTION MANUAL/ MTG SOIL MANUAL MATERIALS USED (TEST REPORTS): -D - WEATHER: (/ Ov i t.o CJ DEFICIENCIES CLEARED: 1 UNCORRECTED DEFICIENCIES, MISSING RF!/ CO, ADDITIONAL TESTS REQUIRED: SAMPLES lAKEN ¢ TESTS REQUIRED 888 Rancheros Drive, Suite E San Marcos, California 92069 Tel: (619) 735-5060 Fax: (619) 735-8979 SPECS (Y) (N) APPROVED SHOP DRAWINGS (Y) (N) PRJ. NO. -Z143 -of°( PG OF I , I TiME START: l:oo A.I"'\ TIME FINISH: l O : ;}J:;, · Al}THORIZED BY: H,_:, j J./~ I hereby certify that I have observed the work list_ed above and. that it complies with the soii investigati~ecom-;;endations, - and / or the approved plans, specifications and applicable sections of the building code, unless otherwise noted. 3 I :);t /199 9 b Date of Report Certification Number Rev: 5/95 PI.ONTANA 2992 E. La Palma, Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 \ R:::J::•oR r IJF CYL I l',.!DEl~ rt::STS Testing & Geotechnical, Inc. 888 Rancheros Dr., Suite E S!m Marcos, CA 92069 Tel: (619) 735-5060 Fax: (619) 735-8979 CI TY (If-GARLSBAD-BLDG. INSPECT I ON DEPT. ,-::IZ! l::i Lf--lS i-::•AL!Ylf.48 CARLSBAD, (.;A '::l2i:i'.Ui.J~ CLIENT: Hf--lMANN CONSTRUCT I ON· ·. PROJECT.NO. 29.l}3-19 PROJECT NAME: DA IL Y INDUSTRIAL CENTER PROJECT ADDR. CARSLBAD BP/OSA NO. PLAN FILE NO. 95···605 SET 1831t.1 AGE NOMINAL ACTUAL AREA LOAD STRENGTH TYPE OF DATE LAB NUMBER (DAYS) r:1 7 Apr 05 ' B ;:::a npr 26 C 28 (.:)pr 26 SPECIFIED STRENGTH 4it)IZIIZI PSI LOCATION LO l" 38 PANEL :J:!:N---a CASTBY FB CONCRETE SUPPLIER NELSON I SLOAN MIX NO. 66.l~'?J TYPE OF CEMENT TICKET NO. 558881t.'l MIXING TIME bb MIN WATER ADDED AT SITE 60 Gf-ll..,.LONS AUTHORIZED BY Df.:W-118.lt SLUMP IN REMARKS DISTRIBUTION ( 2) HAM~lNN C.:UNS1" RUCTION SIZE 6X12 6X12 &X12 ·er rY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG. INSPECTION DEPT., (SO. IN.) (LBS) (PSI) FRACTURE 28. 4-6 815Q.'0 28&2; 28. 4£'\ 28 • .l~& DATE RECEIVED '-3&. Apr. Qii AIR % UNIT WEIGHT PCF CONCRETE TEMP 70 o F AMBIENT TEMP 612! o F ADMIXTURES t.-JRDf°=l 6-4 Respectfully Submitted, ~~~~ · Dc6NFORMS COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH: DOES NOT CONFORM D 96.Apr.08 MONTANA 2992 E. La Palma, Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 -Fax: (714) 632-2974 HJ:::PORT DF t::YL:CNDER TE::STS Testing & Geotechnical, Inc. 888 Rancheros Dr., Suite E San Marcos, CA 92069 Tel: (619) 735-5060 Fax:.(619) 735-8979 CITY OF CARLSHt:m-BL.DG. INSPECTION DEPT. 21Z1 fo U-48 i:•ALIY!f-48 CARLSB-AD, CA gi.:::1Z112.19 CLIENT: Hf-".JMANN COMSTRUCT I ON 1831 PROJECT NO. i::'.'::li.i-:3-l 9 PROJECT NAME: DAILY INDUSTRIAL CENTER PROJECT ADDR. CAHSLBr=!D BP/OSA NO. 95-E,05 PLAN FILE N.O. SET AGE DATE NOMINAL ACTUAL AREA LOAD STRENGTH TYPE OF LAB NUMBER (DAYS) . SIZE A 7 f'.=lpr 0i=-.... , €-X12 B 28 Apr 26 6X12 C i::!8 Apr 26 6X12 SPECIFIED STRENGTH 4tZf01Z! PSI CASTBY CLT LOCATION LOT 38 COLUMN POUR 1N i-'LS~CE CONCRETE SUPPLIER MIX NO. €.is49 TICKET NO. o5 B'0-4b WATER ADDED AT SITE AUTHORIZED BY SLUMP IN REMARKS NEL$DN / SLOAN TYPE OF CEMENT MIXING TIME DISTRIBUTION ( 2 ) HAMi'-=lNN CONSTRUCT I ON MIN (SQ. IN.) 28. '{·b 28.46 28 •. lj.€_, ON 96. Mar. 29 AIR UNIT WEIGHT CONCRETE TEMP AMBIENT TEMP ADMIXTURES (LBS) (PSI) FRACTURE 7i.t250 i::'.6!t)9 DATE RECEIVED 96.Apr.01 WRDA 6 1+ % PCF 75 o F 71Zt 0 F CI fY OF CARLSBf.~D-BLDG" INSPECTION DEPL Res1>ectfully Submitted, COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH: DcoNFORMS DOES NOT CONFORM D 96.Apr.08 JUNE 25, 1996 -MONTANA 2992 E. La Palma, Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 Testing & Geotechnical, Inc. 888 Rancheros Dr., Suite E San Marcos, CA 92069 Tel: (619) 735-5060 Fax: (619) 735-8979 Hamann Construction 475 West Bradley Avenue El Cajon, CA 92020 Project No: 2943-019 Log No: 6-1739 ATTN: Mr. James Graves RE: SATISFACTORY COMPLETION OF THE WORK REQUIRING SPECIAL INSPECTION PERFORMED UNDER PERMIT NO. 95-605 RE: DAILY INDUSTRIAL CENTER - \f954 Kell_ggg_Ay~n.ue,_Carlshad,_C~ ATTN: Mr Graves: To the best of my knowledge and except as noted in our Inspectors reports , all of the work requiring special inspection, testing, and construction observation for the structure constructed under the subject pennit is essentially in conformance with the approved plans, specifications and the applicable workmanship provisions of the Uniform Building Code. • -~ J ' • • The types and dates of special Inspections are listed below: REINFORCED CONCRETE INSPECTION MARCH22-25, 28-29, 1996 SITE STRUCTURAL STEEL APRIL 8-11, 19, 22-23, 1996 If you should have any questions concerning this report, please contact me. Respectfully Douglas Hitchingham - Senior Materials Engineer MEMBER MONTANA 2992 E. La Palma; Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 REPORT OF CYLINDER TESTS Testing & Geotechnical, Inc. 888 Rancheros Dr., Suite E San Marcos, CA 92069 Tel: (619) 735-5060 Fax: (619) 735-8979 CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG. INSPECTION DEPT. 2075 u;s p,:;L.MAS PROJECT NO. 2'34:0-· 1 9 PROJECT NAME;b'-f';.I I._){ ]:,Rf,[ U~~'*iL CARLSBAD, CA 92009 CLIENT:J-iAMANN CONSH,:UCT I ON SET1764 AGE -NOMINAL LAB NUMBER (DAYS) DATE SIZE A 7 P1pr 01. E,X 1:~:: p ;:. :;~s {-:ipr ::2:;~ 6X12 C i:::-i::; 'J~, M-:::,y 2() 6X12 SPECIFIED STRENGT~:F"i::TT'.)j); PSI --------CASTBYFB LOCATION t•J·--4 PANEL CONCRETE SUPPLIER NELSON / SLOr~,N MIX NO. 55:2 TYPE OF CEMENT TICKET NOt5::;i8082 MIXING TIME E,() MIN WATER ADDED AT SITE :l O GALUJNS AUTHORIZED BY DF.'. I 'v'ER SLUMP IN REMARKS DISTRIBUTION ( :2 ) HAMf'.:1NN CONSn.;:uCT I ON CI TY OF cr~il?LSB(..':iD-}~LDG. INSPECT I ON DEPT. -·· CENTE!:;;: PROJECT ADDR:;::{.:its:SU3r:;D BP/OSA NO. 9~5--50~.i PLAN FILE NO. ACTUAL AREA LOAD (SQ. IN.) (LBS) ;~f3" .:.tE, E,5()(i() 28.46 :l () !.5 () () () STRENGTH (PSI) :~:::t3::l :::; f:1 ~3 1:.1 28.46 j_ l ~i()()(i Gi..cl.i;;J:.QJ TYPE OF FRACTURE {i ON 96 • M-:::11° • 25 DATE RECEIVED 9 E, • i'1 E;. r-• 2 f, ~R % UNIT WEIGHT PCF CONCRETE TEMP f,E, ° F AMBIENT TEMP 60 ° F ADMIXTURES l,JRDfl f.:,4 Respectfully Submitted, ~~L~f~ C OcoNFORMS COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH: DOES NOT CONFORM D . .... ,, 2992 E. la Palma, Suite A Anaheim, California 92806 Tel: (714) 632~2999 -M:ONTANA Testing & Geotechnical, Inc. Fax: (714) 632-2974 FIELD REPORT COVERING WORK FOR . _AVAILABLE: SOIL REPORT Y (N) -6\"'f'E-WE=L.P\N~ APPROVED PLANS@(N) ,fOR WEEK ENDING A ,') (' '1' l..U C{(o _REPORTNO. 04 PLAN FILE NO. N INSPECTION ADDRESS ~E REPORTING REQUIREMENTS: ICBO FIELD INSPECTION MANUAL/ MTG SOIL MANUAL MAJERJALS IJSED JTESTREPORTS)~ . . EH t G&k:'.'.1&1:~L NR. 21 \ CFC.Aw). 888 Rancheros Drive, Suite E San Marcos, California 92069 Tel: (619) 735-5060 Fax: (619) 735-8979 SPECS (Y) PG l OF EQUIPMENT/MANPOWER USED: · \ WE:L.DE.R QPfgkrcg ·. b--\ARK R, §rt\GKLE:t<: F<::Aw _ cee:r ~~6'::,4--BS--G:,:,S4, t ·nwc..t< w/wa..p- \Nb MAct-l1~ ITEMS OBSERVED (DETAIL NOS.): ll t /. I I 1i _waoso1sr 1'0 L4~4)( ,2 ~W:!A.\~ ;:~.woo ft /4X4)( 0:..4! :ro &\ROER PER,DE.1~\L o/$".\. WEID f::dRDe<,To ~t¼,.{t \tR 00\~L 'r~9 . _REMARK~. INC~UDl~_G .l.lEETII-/G~: -. . ... . WEATHER: 0 : ~P'To10°F SAMPLES TAKEN NONE: TESTS REQUIRED N.ONE- _DEFICIENCIES CLEARED: UNCORRECTED .DEFICIENCIES, MISSING Rfl / CO, ADDITIONAL TESTS REQUIRED: l II A ~1ME·~r~R~:1·;_00.A~-.. · · ·t1MEF1N1sfi, -~:00 a.,r:__ AurnoR1zrnsv: /{;[ .) 1A ' .. · · · I hereby-certify that I have observed the work listed above .an·d· tharit compli~s with the soil investigati&n recommendatio~s. . . and / or the approved plans, specifications and applicable sections of the building code, unless otherwise noted.· Slg;(re 4 1 IC\ 119$4> Date of .Report Certification Number 3 lie.K C., · \.\DXX-k0 Print Name Rev: 5/95 -MONTANA 2992 E. La Palma, Suite A Ananeini, CA 92806 Tel; (714)632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 REPORT OF CYLINDER TESTS Testing & Geotechnical, Inc. 888-Rancheros Dr., Suite E San Marcos, CA 92069 · Tel: (619) 735-5060 Fax: (619) 735-8979 2Q43 .... 19 PROJECT NO. CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG. INSPECTION DEPT. 2075 LAS PALMAS PROJECT NAM1::.sl.:~±s-Y:-:W:P~::ft~L CARLSBAD, CA 92009 CLIENT: HAMANN CONSTRUCT ;I: ON SET 1 831 AGE DATE NOMINAL LAB NUMBER (DAYS) SIZE A 7 Apr 05 6X12 B 28 Apr 26 6X12 C 28 Apr 26 6X12 -- SPECIFIED STRENGT~---4-0]]) PSI CAST BY CL T LOCATION LOT 38 COLUMN POUR IN PLACE CONCRETE SUPPLIER NELSON / SLOAN MIX NO. 6 6 4 9 TYPE OF C'™ENT TICKET NO. 5 5 8 94 6 WATER ADDED AT SITE AUTHORIZED BY SLUMP IN REMARKS DISTRIBUTION ( 2 ) MIXING TIME HAMANN CONSTRUCTION MIN CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG. INSPECTION DEPT. "CENTER PROJECT ADDR.CARSLBAD BP /OSA NO. 9 l? ..... S 0 5 PLAN FILE NO. ACTUAL AREA LOAD STRENGTH (SQ. IN.) (LBS) (PSI) 28.46 74250 2609 28.46 120000 421$ 28.46 119750 c~go:n TYPE OF FRACTURE ON 96'. Mar. 29 DATE RECEIVED 9 6 • A p r . 0 1 AIR UNIT WEIGHT % PCF CONCRETE TEMP 7 5 ° F AMBIENT TEMP 7 0 ° F ADMIXTURES \•JR DA 6 4 Respectfully Submitted, COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH: D 96.Apr.29 -M.ONTANA 2992 E. La Palma, Suite A Anaheim, CA 92(,106 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 REPORT OF CYLINDER TESTS Testing & Geotechnical, Inc. 888 Rancheros Dr., Suite E San Marcos, CA 92069 Tel: (619) 735-5060 Fax: (619) 735-8979 CITY .OF CARLSBAD-BLDG. INSPECTION DEPT. 2075 LAS PALMAS CARLSBAD, CA 92009 CUEN~ HAMANN CONSTRUCTION PROJECT NO. 2 94 3····· 1 9 - ~"T'Nl"'F~~I PROJECT NAME~L)-M-J.-1-T-J..:UU.J...i.1.,;;1~J-1'W.-K i.. CENTER PROJECT ADDR.CARSLBAD BP/OSA NO. 9 5 ···· 6 0 5 PLAN FILE NO. SET 1830 AGE DATE NOMINAL ACTUAL AREA LOAD STRENGTH TYPE OF LAB NUMBER (DAYS) . SIZE A 7 Apr 05 6X12 B 28 Apr 26 6X12 C '1·0 ~'-' Apr 26 6X12 ' SPECIFIED STRENGTH'CAJfQ])} PSI CAST BY FB LOCATION LOT 38 PANEL #N····-8 CONCRETE SUPPLIER NELSON / SLOAN MIX NO. 6 6 4 9 TYPE OF CEMENT TICKET NO. 5 5 8 8 8 0 MIXING TIME 66 MIN WATER ADDED AT SITE 6 0 GAL LONS AUTHORIZED BY DAV····· 11 84 SLUMP IN J:IEMARKS DISTRIBUTION ( 2 ) HAMANN CONSTRUCTION CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG. INSPECTION DEPT. (SQ. IN.) (LBS) (PSI) FRACTURE 28.46 81500 2863 28.46 130000 4567 28.46 132250 G6.4]_\ ON 9 6 ~ Mar • 2 9 DATE RECEIVED 9 6 . Apr . 0 1 AIR UNIT WEIGHT °lo PCF CONCRETE TEMP 7 0 ° F AMBIENT TEMP 6 0 ° F ADMIXTURES v-rn DA 6 4 Respectfully Submitted, COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH: 96.Apr.29 ' I I ~ -~ ,. 2992 E. ,La Palm.a, Suite A Anaheim, California 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 -COVERING WORK FOR -ONTANA AVAILABLE: SOIL REPORT@(N) APPROVED PLANS ©(NJ REPORT NO. C::,lp PLAN FILE NO. 'REPORTING REQUIREMENTS: ICBO flELD INSPECTION MANUAL/ MTG $0I LMANUAL WEATHER: . . . . {i;o0£ :ro 75°£ DEFICIENCIES CLl;ARED: UNCcif\RECTED.DEFiCIENciES, MISSING RFI / CO, ADDITIONAL TESTS:REQUIRED: TIME START: '7: 00 ~-TIMEFINISH: ~:00, , . SAMPLES TAKEN NOMt;. TESTS REQUIRED NOl--lf AUTHORIZED BY: 888 Rancheros Drive, Suite E San Marcos, California 92069 Tel: (619) 735-5060 Fax: (619) 735-8979 SPECS (Y)I!)) APPROVED SHOP DRAWINGS N) PRJ. NO. '2.Cf PG L OF 2 PERMIT NO. ~'S-<oo5 I hereby certify that I have observed the work listed abov~ and that it complies with the soil investigation recommendations, and / or the approved plans, specifications and applicable sections of the building code, unless otherwise noted. 4 / 23 /199(e. S1gna e . Date of Report Certification Number ~~-¼mt:.$. Print Name Rev: 5/95 -,• 2992 E. La Palma; Suite A Anaheim, California 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 inature ~Cb. UO~en Print Name -MONTANA Testing & Geotechnical, Inc. FIELD REPORT CONTINUED 888 Rancheros Drive, Suite F San Marcos, California 92069 Tel: (619) 735-5060 Fax: (619) 632~2974 4 J '2.~ /199&;, Date of Report 1~206 \<$0 Certification Nurriber :-,:· 2992 E. La Palma·, Suite A Anaheim-, California 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 COVERING WORK FOR " MONTANA Testing & Geotechnical, Inc. FIELD REPORT AVAILABLE: SOIL REPORT(YJ (N) _APPROVED PtANS~(N) FOR WEEK ENDING 4-21-qCt, REPORT NO. PLAN FILE NO • . PROJECT NAME REPORTING REQUIREMENTS: ICBO FIELD INSPECTION MANUAi:. / MTG SOIL MANUAL WEATHER: fo01 F fo 75°F DEFICIENCIES CLEARED: . _UNCORRECTED DEFICIENCIES, MISSING RFI / CO, ADDITIONAL TESTS REQUIRED: _TIME START: "):oo A~ TIME FINISH: 3: ~ 0\. SAMPLES TAKEN NONG TESTS REQUIRED N{)NG. AUTHORIZED BY: 888 Rancheros Drive, Suite E San Marcos, California 92069 Tel: (619) 735-5060 Fax: (619) 735-8979 SPECS (Y) tfil) APPROVED SHOP DRAWINGSc(!lXN) PRJ. NO. 29 PG I OF 2 '2. \ I hereby certify that I have observed the work listed apove and that it complies with the soil investigation recommendations, and / or the approved plans, specifications and applicable sections of the building code, unless otherwise noted. 4 , Z! _1199& ·oate of Report Certification Number · Print Name Rev: 5/95 2992 E. La Palma,' Suite A Anaheim, California 92806 tel: (714) 632'-2999 fax: (714) 632-2974 · ~ Signature ;!R1<t1-~s Print Name MONTANA Testing & Geotechnical, Inc. FIELD REPORT CONTINUED 4-2.'2..-qc,, 4· / 22l /199(p Date of Report 888 Rancheros Drive, Suite F San Marcos, California 92069 Tel: (619) 735-5060 Fax: (619) 632-2974 Certification Number MONTANA 2992 E. La Palma, Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 REPORT OF CYLINDER TESTS Testing & Geotechnical, Inc. 888 Rancheros Dr., Suite E San Marcos, CA 92069 Tel: (619) 735-5060 Fax: (619) 735-8979 CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG. INSPECTION DEPT. 20 7 5. LAS PALMAS CARLSBAD, CA 92009 CLIENT: HAMANN CONSTRUCT I ON PRQJ.ECT NO. 2 94 3 ..... 1 9 PROJECT NAME: DAILY INDUSTRIAL CENTER PROJECT ADDR. CARSL8AD BP/OSA NO. 9 5·--6 0 5 PLAN FILE NO. {2£[.t:~g SET 1764 AGE. DATE NOMINAL· ACTUAL AREA LOAD STRENGTH TYPE OF LAB NUMBER (DAYS) A 7 Apr 01 8 28 Apr 22 C 56 May 20 SPECIFIED STRENGTH~ PSI LOCATION hl·--4 PAN EL CAST BY FB CONCRETESUPPLIER NELSON / SLOAN MIX NO. 5 5 2 TYPE OF CEMENT TICKET NO. 5 5 8 0 8 2 MIXING TIME 6 0 MIN WATER ADDED AT SITE 10 GALLONS AUTHORI.ZED BY DRIVER · SLUMP IN REMARKS DISTRIBUTION ( 2) HAMANN CONSTRUCTION SIZE 6X12 6X12 6X12 (SQ. IN.) (LBS) (PSI) 28.46 65000 2284 28.46 105000 W-8]] 28.46 ON 9 6 • Mar • 2 5 AIR UNIT WEIGHT CONCRETE TEMP AMBIENT TEMP AQMIXTURES DATE RECEIVED ~JRDA 64 % PCF 66 o F 60 o F FRACTURE A CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG. INSPECTION DEPT. Resp.ectfully Submitted, COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH: DcoNFORMS DOES NOT CONFORM D 96 •. Apr. 22 -------------~ MONTANA 2992 E. La-Palma, Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: (714)-632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 REPORT OF CYLINDER TESTS Testing & Geotechnical, Inc. 888 Rancheros Dr., Suite E San Marcos, CA 92069 Tel: (619} 735-5060 Fax: (619) 735-8979 CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG. INSPECTION DEPT. 2075 LAS PALMAS CARLSBAD. CA 92009 ,CLIENT: HAMANN CONSTRUCTION PROJECT NO. 2 9 4 3 .... , 1 9 PROJECT NAME: DAILY INDUSTRIAL CENTER PROJECT ADDR. CARSLBAD BP/OSA NO. 9 5 ·-" 6 0 5 PLAN FII.E NO.[Zf1'£_;f-(~±f-::J SET 175-5 AGE-NOMINAL ACTUAL AREA LOAD STRENGTH TYPE OF DATE LAB'NUMBER (PAYS) SIZE A 7 Apr 01 6X12 B 28 Apr 22 ·6X12 C 28 Apr 22 6X12 SPECIFIED STRENGTH ~QJtQj PSI LOCATION ~'J-1 PANEL CASTBY FB CONCRETE SUPPLIER NELSON / SLOAN MIX NO. 6 6 4 9 TYPE OF CEMENT TICKET NO. 5 5 8 1 4 3 MIXING TIME 102 MIN WATER ADDED ·AT SITE 2 0 GAL LONS AUTHOFIIZED BY DRIVER SLUMP' 4 • 5 IN REMARKS DISTRIBUTION ( 2 ) HAMANN CONSTRUCTION (SQ. IN.) (LBS) (PSI) FRACTURE 28.46 92000 3232 28.46 137000 4813 28.46 136000 c:::A-7-.1.SJ ON 9 6 • Mar • 2 5 DATE RECEIVED 9 6 • Mar • 2 6 AIR UNIT WEIGHT % PCF CONCRETE TEMP 7 4 ° F AMBIENT TEMP 7 0 ° F ADMIXTURES WROA 64 CITY OF CARLSBAD-SLOG_ INSPECTION DEPT. Respectfully Submitted, COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH: CONFORMS DOES NOT CONFORM D 96.Apr.22 2992 E. t~ Palma. Suite A Anaheim, California 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: .(114) 632-2974 COVERING WORK FOR sua:coNTRACTOR -MONTANA Testing & Geotechnical, Inc. FIELD REPORT . AVAILABLE: SOIL REPORT @N) APPROVED PLANS @(N) . FOR WEEK END4 . : . ..lo q REPORT NO. () ) PLAN FILE NO •. PROJECT NAME / 888 Rancheros Drive, Suite E San Marcos, California 92069 Tel: (619) 735-5060 Fax: (619) 735-8979 SPECS (N) APPROVED SHOP DRAWINGS (Y) (N) PG \ OF l PERMIT NO. C~'9S-too DP..\~"'( \NC>l)S -~\A.L ce. INSPECTION ADDRESS ADDRESS OF PROJECT 1 T954""~-=---~~~A~-~l ~t>\ c,e:... REPORTING REQUIREMENTS: ICBO FIELD INSPECTION MANUAL/ MTG SOIL MANUAL EOUiPMENTiMANPOWER USED: . . . . 2HE.N, 21J<od<'5 w/ ltJEWlt\LGt HAClJlt:.JES, ~ 0p~,e ·. ~ Eb1.i$C®6 cegr. ~~S72-3$-8'f Vt~ A&\-1~\>0-QITT. CE:gf. ?S~ S52.-S2.-U:>f/l l.1BOINb1 ·\1?.D(£~S · t\R. \\q?f. W\S t\Wbti!ED.1J-\'f.~f · f'.Wi CORED ARC mDrtJ(:;t lFt;A'-'J) . ~~ ~'fe . . AAs A&~ED 1liA1 1067~ £>f ALk wavs ~ HPk QAA.·:n<Ai-Je..s-:rw. lt= ANY cm.\(s lK wa.os A~€ FaJN,i ICfflo cf IJJELOS MUf>f 1361££?1'@. MR-l\o?E \.lr,s AL~ R&w66ro A. \>-JEU:>1t-J~ B';o~vg~ WEATHER: %8f-ro 1i6r DEFICIENCIES CLEARED: _UNCORRECTED DEFICIENCIES, MISSING RFI / CO, ADDITIONAL TES:rs REQUIRED: SAMPLES "fAKEf,/ I~ ()l,-\\Z,. TEsTs REQUIRED NO}lc I Tl~~--s~~~l':-_'J;~:J:Q,i\ti --'· -~IME~INISH: g;ao f'M . . .··~: _ ~--:~ .: .. ~:~:_A~!~~~~E?_BY: ..... I( >l ... ~ .V ~ ~ ... l.. . .... f;·:·.:.; _,·\-~ ~:·:·:· :--:-j hereb'{ciirtify1th;t I liavebb~~r:~;l~he work\st~l~bove and:that it complies with-the soil investigatib11'reco~m_end~ti_of!s, ·-.. '.,". .. ... : . . , . -and I or-the apprqved plans, specifications· and applicablesections' of thri' oi.Jildin·g-codei·:iinless otherw)se noted. . · . 4 / q /1~9£p Date of Report Certification Number ·print Name Rev: 5/95 2992 E. t~ Palma. Suite A Anaheim, California 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 -MONTANA Testing & Geotechnical, Inc. FIELD REPORT AVAILABLE: SOIL REPORT(il){N) APPROVED PLANS@(N) REPORT NO. ·Q 2 PLAN FllE NO. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS: ICBO FIELD INSPECTION. MANUAL/ MTG SOil MANUAL LOCATION OF WORK: 888 Rancheros Drive, Suite E San Marcos, California 92069 Tel: (619) 735-5060 Fax: (619)735-8979 SPECS (Y) (© APPROVED SHOP DRAWINGS (Y) ®' fOOJ\t--l(;\C.ONNEC..1"\0ijS: PAN~L~ Nf@E'llKJ@t4BtN<o@ ~1, SA-@;s I W4@W5. WaDSAPl2LE EA~"t'.tolot;ffiHELM TQPOORp CDWJELTIOt::\<k ~ f'~~L·~~@e:4,G'2.~6~~B@Et,l'-l:1@NB1Hf.:>@N1,~@h\'2 1 "14@E.\ . . /II' ot\ \\ ,, ot= Tt\t:. 'it 1 -z. )( o )(, 7 -ro \?A\'lEL RE.eiAK. w/ \/1:e t=\..ME-'Z,E:VEL WE:LO lvJ\1\.\ A.'1 l}=A'i:?f "211 QF VEg{. l>.l~ ~ ~~op ~RS ~/5\~GU:. Be!&l wa..P @~ct::'1--~E.C..1\Q~. ~~ 2.~p:-C\:HS 'i?epc:,Jtl', V\R.\\QEE, \-\~'b~llEeIJ:,p ()s ~\N(;a. 'fFot•V-'t'~G~:COR~NC::( A.'et)Jt;;. Cl::\Ai-4(ae pot<. l:\'h : ~VL~W~ ~WR.OVAL Yl'EATHER; 540F DEFICIENCIES CLEARED: NCORRECTED DEFICIENCIES, MISSING RFI / CO,.ADDITIONAL TESTS REQUIRED: TIME FINISH: ~ ~ ?,o . SAMPLES TAKEN NONE- TESTS REQUIRED NOt-,1~ AUTHORIZED BY: I-hereby certify that I have observed the work listed above and that it complies with the soil investigation recommendations, and / or the approved plans, specifications and applicable sections of the building code, unless otherwise noted. 4 . ! 10 /1$9~ Qate of Report 12>208 \COO Certification Number . JACKGJ. uooee.s Print Name Rev: 5/95 2992 E. La. Palma, 'Suite A Anaheim, California 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 -MONTANA Testing & GeotechnicaJ, Inc. FIELD REPORT CONTINUED . . 888 Rancheros Drive, Suite F San Marcos, California 92069 Tel: (619) 735-5060 Fax: (619) 632-2974 _PROJECTM'.!11~ INl)l l~1'2tl!!...I r i=N-n:;R. AD°t~s~PW~fl n~ Avr:;..rb.r;,1. ~n.A.D. r.A.. PR~ Nd.2943-Q \ 9 1· PLAN FILE NO. . ~RMITNQ -I . 'C P,, 95-<oa,:; REPORT NO. O 2 PG 2. OF .... . . - .. n (.)_ ..-;::.::·, .. :v.· . <tr "-· ... ~ .. ,/ PANt:\ ~ ......... ~ --.. i:i' • ' 'I I', ·~· TA . ·!-4 1 ........ ~ / .l'"<I. -A. • ···:! .. :; •:•: ." I ,, 'J·;v ~--,4 ,. ... &. /l .,_ " .... .. ' '" \ "'\. '/ ' ~ 4. ,. p I'\. J> fir. . . ~ ~,,~ J: . • • 'Q· ... 1' / ~ .•· .... : _,' -' ... :-~_o,-,\:·-::'( . ' .... :;_~i:~ -!I"""'" .• i • -V / ..... , d ,, ·., J ' 0 '(/ I/ " : / yf \ ~11 Mlli, 0 . ft "-/ p· 1/o, ~V\ / 0 . 'I ~· '. I) 0 . . ' . 0 ., • (/ V "': -' .. 4.. ... '~ "• \-::· .. : .. ~ -: f/ r . :, -I M 1: -~ •;tl'"i :· .~ b-·· •• :....-·: \ \11,• .. t .. ,._ :·' ~ / .I\ -' / I '\ I/. /J ~~-/ /~\\t,...l~. ill' .. / .,,, ,,, f '. //. // // IA -~ ,.. :-... ~·':'·, .x~---. ,-4· ., .. 'v . , o.. :... -" _, & I 4 ---~ ,,, -I l .. ,, _.,,,.. ~ \ . . - ' N.T.S : ., ,- , . s~ 4 , lO 11990 Date of. Report 73208\CW Certification Number JACKC-1 J-loQG,E.S ·Print Name .. , - 2992 E. La Palma~ Suite A Anaheim, California 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-297 4 M·ONTANA Testing & Geotechnical, Inc. FIELD REPORT 888 Rancheros Drive, Suite E San Marcos, California 92069 Tel: (619) 735-5060 Fax: (619) 735-8979 COVERING WORK FOR AVAILABLE: SOIL REPORT(!ll(N) SPECS (Y)@ . &\ \IJELD\NG:, _ APPROVED PLANS@(N), APPROVED SHOP DRAWINGS (Y)@> FOR.WEEK ENDING PRJ. NO. 4 IS q(p 294~-o\9 REPORT NO. Q ~ PG I OF coNTRACTOR ~ N 11~,~uc lON· , IHA.MAt u.A""~'" .:-r .. PLAN FILE NO, -~05 PROJECT NAME OA\L: ·,N· INSPECTION ADDRESS ADDRESS OF PROJECT ~~E 1954-KE..LLO~ CAt<.L':> e,AD, cA REPORTING REQUIREMENTS: ICBO FIELD INSPECTION MANUAL/ MTG SOIL MANUAL MATERIALS USED (TES.T REPORTS), . . . . . , ~~Tt-,1 A.3C:7 1 A~-n,,\ IA ,Ofo, a.r:£..JRQQE::'=> N\2.. 2\l 3PMENT/MA~WER USED: . . · \"\E~-1 ~\NG ""A.C.\.\l~E:S1 ~Lte~ OPE.'2AJO~·. ~~R.1 PQttfECQRVG CEB.155t S72-~S-B92 21Al<MA.~,::2 DIA-z.CEITT: SSf2S2-81-2~BJ1~ RoN C\-\AV~ Z. C€Rr S~ 55\-1.':>-5053 ITEMS OBSERVED (DETAIL NOS.): ~-I~ W@C.01<0 $PLICE. PER 01:11'\L 11/se, .&s 2t:!P FLR · IA)~LD t00nt-M:~ CONHE,C..T\ON@. PANGL !oLt-tT~ P&~ ~1~\L ?.Y~1 • CON-rtNtJEQ ot:,! PA&!;. 2. LOCATION OF WORK: . . . . CORD ~L\tE '2t~.t'rLR ?AN6l.':>. t,l\@N2.1 w-r@t·U ':Wlp@W1 lw4@WS,W';@ W41 u,2.@w~, S1 @tQ\J ~@~,, · S~Sto, ~4@E>S, l=OOTlt-W."-i C0Nt-U:.~11Qt:iS :NS@Nlt>, \~':>@E\1 NORT\.\~~I! ~~\::\~Ll.2 REMARKS, INCLUDING MEETINGS: ~ ·~01&!~A~6L NS Ll~E©@.f)u~J;C~E) G.t&a;.&seAJ'.VJB~hln:r \\--l~Q \'E.Rvt.AN. Vc-rA\L I s9 l~DlCf\1es. 11--l~, ~~4 ~ ~/4x ,~011 &u~oe& se.A:r \'b A.1;.;t-1~12 Eo~t---t§2 LNm A Poc.L<E::r. REF"e:~ -ro · o~T~,1.,~ lP~9 ,, 't;~, co~roR l::!~~ ~LD~I2 G!ust2£& £2i;A.::C g::I...Of,H wcrH w~LL -ro E:X&.:,VaJ:l~~ II - • ft w/rs ElLLE.1" WE:tn~@~ ANO VER"l'iis1De5.n-te COb-l.:tl<A:0-CO<. \'? ~UGG'i'l~bl A. \a='l ~e.. . Ali!::oJ e. c.AAN~, .SAMPLES TAKEN WEATHER: 55°f' To_ G:i8°F TESTS REQUIRED DEFICIENCIES CLEARED: UNCORRECTED DEFICIENCIES, M.ISSING RFI / CO, ADDITIONAL TESTS REQUIRED: , I I , TIME START: I :QO A\-"\ TIME FINISH: ;$, QO f'M r:JiY I 1 AUTHORIZED BY ~ I hereby certify that I have observed the work listed above and that it complies with the soil investigation recommendations, and / or the approved plans, specifications and applicable sections of the building code, unless otheiwise noted • .. 4 / ll /199(o 73208JCW Date of Report Certification Number 'Print Name Rev: 5/95 2992 E. la Pahna,•Suite A Anaheim, California 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 -M-ONTANA Testing & Geotechnical, lhc. FIELD REPORT CONTINUED \1 " \ .'.'.2 ". . "' -.::> OCA'"tlOt--LS ·, -Z. 4 / lJ /1991.a Date of Report, 888 Rancheros Drive, Suite F San Marcos, California 92069 Tel: (619) 735-5060 Fax: (619) 632-2974 OF URA:L Certification Number 2992 E. La Palma~ Suite A Aijaheim, California 92806 Tel; (714) 632-2999 fax: (7'14) 632-2974 COVERING WORK FOR :5rte· . WG'-f>J: ARCHITECT INSPECTION ADORES~ 5"/t~l£ -MONTANA Testing & Geotechnical, Inc. FIELD REPORT AVAILABLE: SOIL REPORT (Y)® APPROVED PLAN~(N) FOR WEEK ENDING _ . i.-/-I 3 -~ '/' REPORT NO. 'PLAN FILE-NO. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS: ICBO FIELD INSPECTION MANUAL/ MTG SOIL MANUAL MATERIALS USED (TEST REPORTS): EQUIPMENT/MANPOWER USED: ITEMS o·ssERVED (DETAIL NOS.): De LOCATION OF WORK; l95'-/ kT=UOb{z cttf!.L>BAI) WEATHER: .) ~ DEFICIENCIES CLEARED: NCORR~CTED DEFICIENCIES, MISSING RFI / CO, ADDITIONAL TESTS REQUIRED: IME,START: ) 3 : 30 TIME FINISH: / 5: (:;;>0 SAMPLES TAKEN TE~TS REQUIRED AUTHORIZED BY: 888 Rancheros Drive, Suite E San Marcos, California 92069 Tel: (619) 735-5060 Fax: (619) 735-8979 SPECS (Y) (N) APPROVED SHOP DRAWINGS (Y) ffil) PRJ. NO. ~ 9' PG t OF I hereby certify that I have observed the work listed above and that it complies with the soil investigation recommendations, and / or the approved ns, specifications and applicable sections of the building code, unless otherwise noted. 'f I // /199 C Date of Report Certifi'ca.iio;Number Rev: 5/95 .. 2992 E. L~ Palma. Suite A Anaheim, California 92806· Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 ITEMSOBSERVED{DETAILN.OS.):/"),. '--·. _J ~ ' l~Y:"Cf C!_..ydJ@..-5 WEATHER:~l®' PEFICIENCIES CLEARED: -MONTANA . Testing & Geotechnical, Inc. FIELD REPORT TESTS REQUIRED ;IMESTART: TIME FINISH: AUTHORIZED BY: 888 Rancheros Drive, Suite E San Marcos, California 92069 Tel: (619) 735-5060 Fax: (619) 735-8979 SPECS {Y) {N) APPROVED SHOP DRAWINGS {Y) {N) I hereby certify that I have observed the work listed above and that it complies with the soil investigation recommendations, and / or the approved plans, specifications and applicable sections of the building code, unless otherwise noted. d,B ,199C;7 Sign ure Date· of Report 1.-t;g} ~~ · Print Name ~ Rev: 5/95 ,., MAR,22,1996 5:02PM HAMANN CONSTRUCTION AFAXFROM 475W. Bradley Avenue, El CaJoh, CA 92020 Phone: 619/440-7424 Extended: 819/286-1515 FAX: 619/440-.6914 DATE:· S·~~ ·2i ('-'th:? TIME: > :L.Nt'"\ _ NO.421 P,1/2 ATTENTION: 2«-t, ,/}J' ;1 f L1 e._S' _ A~ . COMPANY NAME: U-.t7 ..,/Qn,,t.,/44/ /$;/pf,;, l}~~" FAXNUMBER '/J(-0?2~ . . J rRoM: c/vn·u 64:&i..JF.LL&/·t: S'Tt'J~z. NUMBEROFPAGESQNCL~DIN-010VERSHBET)~;2~-- iF TRANSMISSION IS INCOMPLETE CALL: (619) 440-7424 REMARKS: ~ ,,,,qv,,. /J ,&,r;;,;t ril._ ,J7· 7 ~ ,el'-Lt:1 tv ?I _s-/4/a .. //21 ~&L ,eJGf: £VJ:'.'~ ._S'7z;£L. ---··---------------------·--·---- I MAR.22. 1996 . 5:02PM HAMANN CONSTRUCTIQ,__ ____ __, ___ _ .FEt 09 '516 14::30 SMITH CONSUJ..T. ~CH. I ' Smi· '.Cons~ltih i Arch1teq · ' I 5355 Mira Sormrto Plae;e, Suit~~ San .Diego, Callfomla · 921 . . (6·19) 452-~1 FAX (619) 45249. . ! I I • ' I ' C: ·----------....------------ ., I ! EsGil Corporation Professional Plan Revt'ew Engineers DATE: August 21, 1995 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 95-605 PROJECT ADDRESS: 1954 Kellogg Ave. PROJECT NAME: Daily Industrial Building SET:lV ~NT ~ r:JFIRE CJ PLAN REVIEWER Cl FILE .~ The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. D The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's ********** codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. D· The pla·ns transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. D The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. D The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: .[g] Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. D Esgil .Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check. has been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted: (by: )· Telephone#: D REMARKS: By: Kurt Culver Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA DCM D GP D PC 8/14/95 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (619) 560-1468 + Fax (619) 560-1576 EsGil Corporation Professional Plan Review Engineers DATE: July 27, 1995 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 95-605 PROJECT ADDRESS: 1954 Kellogg Ave. PROJECT NAME: Daily Industrial Building SET: III D APPLICA~ Ca JURISDlcjio a PLAN REVIEWER a FILE D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. D The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. cg] The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. ~ The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: _ Smith Consulting Architects-5355 Mira Sorrento Place, Suite 750 San Diego 92121 cg] Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. D Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed . . Person contacted: ~~ Date contacted: 'i\'2-~\"'s--(by:fh,...--) D REMARKS: By: Kurt Culver Esgil Corporation 0 GA O CM O PC Telephone #: Enclosures: 7/20/95 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (619) 560-1468 + Fax (619) 560-1576 Carlsbad 95-605 Ill Jul;y 27,, 1995 RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST Jl)RISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 1954 Kellogg Ave. DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 7/20/95 REVIEWED BY: Kurt Culver FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): PLAN CHECK NO.: 95-605 SET: III DATE RECHECK COMPLETED: July 27, 1995 This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 303 (c), 1991 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. A. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints to: ESGIL CORPORATION. B. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. C. The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews. The original correction number has been given for your reference. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items. D. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. .If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? DYes DNo Carlsbad 95-605 ·111 ; July 27, 1995 2. The mechanical and electrical plans still haven't been signed. 4. Note 19 on sheet AS was NOT revised, as previously requested. 39. a) Some of the tilt-up _wall calculations cc:mtain a "n.g." statement. The engineer should review and comment. h) ( 1) Revise sheet XJ 1, XR 1, etc. of the calculations to use footnote 3 in Table 23-P. r) (1) The boundary element check should include axial forces in the wall, too (P/A + Mc/I). (2) The engineer did not respond to the previous request to review and comment on other items required from Sec. 2625. If you have any questions regarding these items, please contact Kurt Culver of Esgil Corporation at (619) 560-1468. Thank you. DATE: July 3, 1995 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 95-605 ESGIL CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) 560-1468 SET: II PROJECT ADDRESS: 1954 Kellogg Ave. PROJECT NAME: Daily Industrial Building ~s~ CJ PLAN REVIEWER CJ FILE D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. D The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. ~ The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. ~ The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Smith Consulting Architects 5355 Mira Sorrento Place, Suite 750 San Diego 92121 ~ Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. D Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted: (by: ) Telephone#: D REMARKS: By: Kurt Culver Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA DCM D PC 6/22/95 trnsmtl.dot Carlsbad 95-605 II July 3, 1995 RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 1954 Kellogg Ave. DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 6/22/95 REVIEWED BY: Kurt Culver FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): PLAN CHECK NO.: 95-605 SET: II DATE RECHECK COMPLETED: July 3, 1995 This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code-and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. · The following items need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 303 (c), 1991 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. A. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints to: ESGIL CORPORATION. B. To facilitate rechecking, please id~ntify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet _has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. C. The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews. The original correction number has been given for your reference. In case you did not keep a copy of the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding corrections. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items. D. Please indicate bere if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? DYes DNo ' ,: Carlsbad 95-605 II ! July 3, 1995 2. The mechanical and electrical plans weren't signed. 4. Revise Note 19 on sheet A5 to show that the drywall is on both sides of the ceiling joists over the corridor. 7. Provide the letter, as previously requested. 8. From the referenced list: 1. Show the tow-away signage, as requested. 3. Provide the Braille signage, as requested. 20. The engineer should investigate the framing at the angled wall on sheet S4 by grid E/2. It appears that a beam is needed to support the angled sub-purlins. 26. Specify the tie spacing for detail 7 /S5 from the original plans. 27. The sub-diaphragm ratio shown at detail 9/S9 does not meet the Code. 31. A Provide calculations to show that the wall from line 1 to 1. 9 can span horizontally. · B. Justify the element that resists the reaction from the above wall spanning horizontally. C. Check the "notch" in the wall shown at detail 12/S9. 33. A Show the special wall rebar required, such as between openings at panels E4, W7, etc. B. Detail 16/S7 shows that the "d" distance for the rebar at reveals will be only 3.25". This disagrees with the calculations. 39. a) The tilt-up wall calculations submitted are too faint!! Please check the ENTIRE package before you resubmit! ALSO, please clarify the "frame" rn~ntioned on sheet XD51. Concrete frames have special requirements in the Code. ~ ,, Carlsbad 95-605 II • July 3, 1995 39 (continued) h) (1) Include in the calculations footnote 3 from Table 23-P. (2) The sub-diaphragm ratio at detail 9/S5 doesn't meet the Code. (3) Sheet XJ2 is too faint to read. (4) Check the floor sub-diaphragms, too. i) The response to this correction is too faint to read. j) Sheets XL 1 through XL3 are too faint to read. I) Please refer to sheet FF5 from the original calculations. Where is it shown on the plans? m) Why does the response to this correction refer to sheet XL3? It has nothing to do with the original correction. n) Complete the design on sheet XL3 by designing the connections for the chord forces shown. r) (1) Where in the calculations does it show the factored forces, compared to 0.2 f c? (2) The engineer should respond to the other items required from Sec. 2625. If you have any questions regarding these items, please contact Kurt Culver of Esgil Corporation at (619) 560-1468. DATE: May 31, 1995 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 95-605 ESGIL CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) 560-1468 SET:I PROJECT ADDRESS: 1954 Kellogg Ave. PROJECT NAME: Daily Industrial Building D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. D The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. ~ The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. ~ The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Smith Consulting Architects 5355 Mira Sorrento Place, Suite 750 San Diego 92121 ~ Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. D Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted: (by: ) Telephone#: D REMARKS: By: Kurt Culver Enclosures: Esgil Corporation rgJ GA rgi CM D PC 5/18/95 trnsmtl.dot Carlsbad 95-605 May 31, 1995 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST COMMERCIAL PLAN CHECK NO.: 95-605 OCCUPANCY: B-2 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V-N, spr. ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA: 64,000 SPRINKLERS?: Yes REMARKS: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: 5/15/95 DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED: May 31, 1995 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): JURISDICTION: Carlsbad USE: Industrial ACTUAL AREA: 32,000 STORIES: 2 HEIGHT: .... 24' OCCUPANTLOAD: .... 90 DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 5/18/95 PLAN REVIEWER: Kurt Culver This plaii review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulatrng energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enfor_ced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance.of a building permit. Code sections cited are based on the 1991 UBC. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 303 (c), 1991 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. LIST NO. 22, GENERAL COMMERCIAL WITHOUT ENERGY OR POLICY SUPPLEMENTS (1991 use) comforw.dot .:, Carlsbad 95-605 ' May' 31, 1995 • GENERAL 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints, to: Esgil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123, (619) 560-1468. 2. All sheets of the plans and the first sheet of the calculations are required to be signed by the California l,icensed architect or engineer responsible for the plan preparation. Please include the California license number, seal, date of license expiration and the date the plans are signed. Business and Professions Code. 3. Clearly designate (shade) any side yards used to justify increases in allowable area based on Section 506. • EXITS 4. Provide a complete architectural section of the corridor, and exterior exit balcony, showing all fire-resistive materials and details of construction for all floor, walls, roof and all penetrations. Section 3305 (g). THE CORRIDOR CEILING AT 8/A5 ISN'T THE SAME AS 4/6. THE SECTION ON SHEET DOESN'T SHOW DRYWALL ON BOTH SIDES OF THE CEILING JOISTS. 5. Exit signs are required whenever two exits are required. Show all required exit sign locations. Section 3314 (a). (SECOND FLOOR) • ROOFS, 6. Provide skylight details to show compliance with Chapter 34 and Section 5207 or provide ICBO or other recognized approval listing. • FOUNDATION 7. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and specifications have beeri reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soil report are properly incorporated into the plans. (V'lhen required by the soil report). • TITLE 24 DISABLED ACCESS 8. Provide note and details on the plans to show compliance with the enclosed Disabled Access Review List. Disabled access requirements may be more restrictive than the UBC. ;, ·Carlsb~d 95-605 ' May 31, 1995 • ADDITIONAL 9. If both sexes will be employed and the number of employees exceeds four, provide separate toilet facilities for men and women. If "both sexes will l:)e employed and the total number of employees will not exceed four", and only one restroom is provided, note the words in quotation above on the floor plan. Section 705 (c). ASSUMING THERE WILL BE MORE THAN 4 EMPLOYEES, JUSTIFY HAVING BOTH LOWER RESTROOMS AS "MENS." 10. Guardrails: a) Shall be installed at all unenclosed floor and roof openings. b) Shall be installed at open and glazed sides of landings and ramps. c) Shall have a height of 42". d) Shall be detailed showing adequacy of connections to resist the horizontal force prescribed in Table 23-8. e) Openings between railings shall be less than 411 • The triangular openings formed by the riser, tread and bottom element of a guardrail at a stair shall be less than 611 • 11. Per City policy, show on the plans that rooftop equipment will be screened from view. Provide detailing. Is the parapet high enough to accomplish this? 12. Sheet GN1 specifies two sideyards for area increases, while sheet TS1 specifies that three yards will be used. 13. Provide a d~tail on the plans for Key Note 1 on sheet A 1. 14. Many of the "notes" on sheet A 1, A3, etc. refer to a detail, but.that detail call out isn't complete. 15. In general, complete the plans. Fill in all empty reference bubbles and complete all notes, etc. 16. Provide 60" in the direction of door swing for door 106, per Title 24. 17. Provide, complete structural plans and calculations for the storefront system and for the roof/floor "trusses." Carlsbad policy is to require these items now (not deferred until after the permit is issued). This would include the special hangers for the trusses, too. 18. Show on the plans the thickness of all concrete panels. Provide additional detailing. Carlsbad 95-605 ' May' 31, 1995 19. Provide calculations for the grade beam design below the interior concrete shear walls. Check other walls, too. 20. Provide special detailing for the angled wall on ·sheet S4 by grid E/2. 21. Provide straps in the north/south and east/west directions at corner conditions, such as at grid C/2, etc. on sheet S4, for chord/drag forces. 22. Provide detailing for the framing added on sheet S4 east of line C (from 1 to 2). 23. Some of the sub-purlins on sheet S4 have a span greater than 8 feet. Provide design. 24. Justify the adequacy of the 4x1 O's on sheet S4 at the large skylight. 25. Show all the framing (and orientation) around that skylight. 26. Specify the on-center spacing of the "ties" at 7/S5. 27. Show detailing at 1/S5 for the concrete wall on Line C+. 28. At 1/S5, the GLB by .the opening (near grid C/6) will be laterally unbraced. As such, provide design for it as a column element to "drag" lateral loads into the shear wall further down from it. 29. betail on the plans the support below EACH end of the 51/8" x 12" GLB at 1/S5 along Line 6.8. 30. In general, the structural plans are lacking in detail. 31. Provide a section through the top of the walls on line B oh sheet S5, showing compliance with UBC Sec. 2310. One wall along that line has no diaphragm next to it. 32. Detail the drag connection on sheet S5 into the wall on line B (at line 1.5). 33. Show on the plans the thicknesses of all concrete walls and show any special rebar. Also, show the reveals. 34. At detail 5/S7, develop the ten~ion rebar in the footing. 35. Reduce the tie spacing at detail 17/S7, per Ch. 26. 36. Specify the wood ledger bolting at 1/SS (or show it at 8/S8). Carlsbad 95-605 ·May"31, 1995 37. Provide design for 3/S8. 38. Although the calculations cafl for the 5" dimension shown for the anchor bolt location with respect to the ledger at detail 7/S8, check the UBC Stds. for the minimum required distance to the top of the ledger. 39. Regarding the structural calculations: a) No calculations were included for the tilt-up walls! b) On sheet R2, specify the manufacturer of the trusses and provide literature to justify the sizes selected. Also, show on the plans the manufacturer. c) Provide additional truss calculations for the other sizes shown on the plans beyond those designed on sheet R2. d) The tributary width on sheet R7 is wrong. e) Provide design for the GLB on Line B that supports the beams shown on sheet R9. f) For the 52' beam from sheet R9, check the 1" camber shown on the plans. Review other beams, too. g) Provide calculations for the othet GLB's beyond those shown in the calculations. h) Provide a complete sub-diaphragm analysis. i) For the wood ledger connection on sheet R13, etc., check the combination of vertical-plus-lateral loading (Hankinson's formula). j) It appears that additional calculations are required for the roof framing system (connections, etc.). k) Check the LIVE load deflection for the 26' beam on sheet FF3, and others. I) The ledger size shown on sheet FF5 isn't shown at detail 2/S5. m) It appears that additional calculations are required for the floor framing system (connections, etc.). Carlsbad 95-605 , May 31, 1995 ri) On sheet L5, check chord forces elsewhere than shown, too. o) The wall anchorage calculations must be completely revised. Rather than use F=.183W, see equation 36-1 in Ch. 23. Additionallv, review footnote L 3 in Table 23-P. p) On sheet LB, etc., check the GLB's along that line for combined bending- plus-axial loads. · q) Where on the plans are the chord bars shown from sheet L9? r) Provide calculations to show whether the "boundary member" provisions from Sec. 2625 (f) apply. Review the rest of Sec. 2625, too. s) The plans don't show the amount of rebar indicated on sheet L 14. t) The lateral calculations should do a full investigation of collector ("drag") forces. u) Justify detail 4/S5 for the 25k drag force shown on sheet L 15. 40. See next sheet for PME corrections. 41. To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. 42. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. • Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: D Yes D No 43. The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 619/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Kurt Culver at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. Carlsbad 95-605 ~ May"31, 1995 PLUMBING, MECHANICAL AND ENERGY'CORRECTIONS· PLAN REVIEWER: Glen Adamek • PLUMBING (UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE) 1. Show that water heater is adequately braced to resist seismic forces. UPC, Section 1310. 2. Show main roof drainage sizing and overflow roof drainage sizing as per UBC, Section 3207, and UPC, Appendix 'D'. • MECHANICAL (UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE) 3. Show the required ventilation of the Future Office spaces, as per UBC, Section 705. \ 4. Detail access ladder to roof mounted HVAC equipment. 5. Detail overflow (secondary) condensate discharge from air conditioning units that are in a ceiling sp~ce to readily observed locations. (UMC Section 1205) 6. Fire rated corridors are not to be used to convey air to or from rooms. UMC Section 1002. • ENERGY CONSERVATION 7. .. MECH-2 forms show 1st Floor Break/Hall and Shipping HVAC Zones to be oversized. What is 'Meets Total Qs'? Please correct. Provide calculations to show compliance. 8. Show the daylit areas and required daylit area lighting controls for lighting in daylit areas. Title 24, Part 6, Section 131(c). 9. The corrected, completed and signed ENV-1, LTG-1, and MECH-1 forms must be imprinted on the plans. Note: If you have any questions regarding this plan review list please contact Glen Adamek at (619) 560-1468. To speed the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans. Carlsbad 95-605 ~ May 31, 1995 ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW PLAN REVIEWER : Chuck Mendenhall 1. Show the ampere interrupting capacity ( AIC ) ratings of the service equipment. NEC 110-9, 230-65. . . 2. Specify the wiring method you intend to use for this project (i.e., EMT, Metal Flex, NMC etc). 3. Provide the required 8' working space for equipment rated 1200 amps or more and over 6 feet wide. NEC 110-16(c). This is required to qualify for the exception allowing one entrance door to the electrical room. 4. Show the location of all panels "A" & "B"·. NEC 110-16,240-24,300-21. 5. In all occupancies where the exit system serves 100 or more occupants, provide a minimum of 1 foot-candle of emergency illumination at the floor level and specify a second source of power for the emergency illumination (battery or generator). UBC 3313 & NEC 700-16. 6. It is not clear how you are intending to feed the house panel. The single line shows a #1 feeder from the pull section. Is this an unprotected tap feeder from the pull section? Specify which section of the NEC you propose to use to a_llow the unprotected tap. · Note: If you have any questions regarding this electrical plan review list please .. contact the plan reviewer listed above at (619) 560-1468. 10 speed the review process, note on this list ( or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans. Carl~bad 95-605 ,-May,,31, 1995 DEPARTMENT OF STATE ARCHITECTURE-NON RESIDENTIAL TITLE 24 DISABLED ACCESS REQUIREMENTS • DISABLED ACCESS PARKING SPACES 1. An additional sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place at each entrance to off street parking facilities, or immediately adjacent to and visible from each stall or space. The sign shall be not less than 17" by 22" with lettering not less than 1" in height. Per section 3107A(c) required wording is as follows: "Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for persons with disabilities may be towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed at _____ or by telephoning ____ " • CURB RAMPS NOTE: See Figures 31-19A through 31-22. 2. All curb ramps shall have a grooved border 12" wide at the level surface of the sidewalk along the top and each side approximately 3// on center per section 3106(e)7. • SANITARY FACILITIES 3. Doorways leading to men's sanitary facilities shall· be identified by an equilateral triangle 1// thick with edges 12" long and a vortex pointing upward. Women's facilities shall be identified by a circle, 1// thick, 12" in diameter. Unisex facilities shall be identified by a circle with a triangle superimposed on the circle and within the 12" diameter. The required symbols shall be centered on the door at a height of 60". *See section 3105A(b)1.D. See 3105A(e)10 for additional (BRAILLE) signage. Carlsbad 95-605 May 31, •1995 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK' FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PREPARED BY: Kurt Culver BUILDING ADDRESS: 1954 Kellogg Ave. BUILDING PORTION BUILDING AREA (sq. ft.) Industrial Building 32000 .. Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE Building Permit Fee: Pl~n Check Fee: Comments: valuefee.dot PLAN CHECK NO.: 95-605 DATE: May 31, 1995 BUILDING OCCUPANCY: B-2 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V-N, spr. VALUATION MULTIPLIER VALUE ($) 1,101,880 (per applic.) 1,101,880 $ 3743.50 $ 2433.28 Sheet 1 of 1 0 ·• City caf Carlsbad · l#ih·hei4Aiiei·l•ZA•i%il•eet§,JI ~ ' DATE: 1/' 'f'S- BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST / PLANCHECK NO. CB 9 S-:. (:;, 0 S- BUILDING ADDRESS: e~ ve PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ,e(t'w ;z::;,v1.>. /Elf'tJ,-, · ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: .2-1;z. ..,.er~-?:? ~ EST. VALUE {P ~ ffl,_ ENGINEERiN<3c,~[~tMENT APPROVAL The ~em you have submitted for review hu been approved. The approval la based on plans, Information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these Items after this dat•. Including field modiflcationa, must be r8Vlewed by this office to insure continued confom'lance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comrnenta attached, as failure to comply with Instructions In this report can result In suspension of permit to build. 0.A Right-of-Way permit la required prior to construction of the following improvements: ATTACHMENTS ,l\ • . ,, D Dedlcalk)r, ~ Do.e~a..... D 1m~ Applcador1 D 1'l"prov4 Check111t D Futu,;;,provament Agreement D Grading Permit Application D Grading Submittal Checkllat D Right d Way Penni Appllcltlon D Right ~ Way Permit Submittal Checklist and lnformatJon ShNt D Sawer Fie lnformatlon ShNt P:\DOCS\CHKLS1\IP0001.FRM DENIAL By: ________ oate: __ _ NAME: Alee! ~ ~#K, t Cltydcarlsbad ADDRESS: 2075 Las Palmas Dr .• cartsbad, CA 92009 PHONE: (619) 438-1161, Ext. A-4 REVOS/11/M ., 2075 Las Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad_, CA 92009-1576 • (619) 438-1161 • FAX (619) 438-0894 -(!) " BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST SITE PLAN - 1 stdnd./ 3rd./ ~ D D ·1. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: D D A. _ North Arrow D. Property Lines Easements B. Existing & Proposed Structures E. Easements- C. Existing Street Improvements F. Right-of-Way Width & Adjacent Streets 2. Show on site plan: A. Drainage Patterns C. Existing Topography B. Existing_ & Proposed Slopes 3. Include note: •surface water to be directed away from the building foundation at a 2% gradlentfor no less than 5' or 2/3 the distance to the property line (whichever Is less).· (Per 1985 UBC 2907(d)5]. - On graded sites, the top of any exterior foundation shall extend above the elevation of the street gutter at point of discharge or the Inlet of an approved drainage device a minimum of 1_2 lnch,s plus two percenr (J?er 1990 UBC 2907(d)5.). 4. Include on title sheet A. Site address B. Assessor's Parcel Number C. Legal-Description For commerciaVlndustriat buildings and tenant Improvement projects, include: Total building square footage with the square footage for each different use, existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing, warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved. · · EXJSTING l?ERMrT NUMBER DESCRIPTION Page 1 c:14 REVOl/11/N BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST ~ DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE 2 v' 3rd./ / D 5. Pro!ect does no½ cc:mply with the following Engineering Conditions of approval for ProJect No. ti , z @i· Conditions were complied with by: _____ _ Date:. ______ _ DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS 6. Dedication for all street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the building site and any storm drain or utility easements on the building site is required for an new buildings and for remodels with a value at or exceeding $. _____ -pursuant to Code Section 18.40.030. Dedication required as follows: __________________ _ Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process. Provide the completed application form and the req'1,lirements on the checklist at the time of resubmittal. Dedication completed by ______________ _ Date:. ___ _ IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS D D D 7a. AH needed public lmprove,rents upon and adja<;ent to the building site must be constructed at time of building e9nstruction whenever the value of the construction exceeds S -pursuant to Code Section 18.40.040. Public improvements required • follows: ____________ _ P,._ have ·a registered CMI Engineer prepare appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements on the attached checklist for a separate plancheck procesa through the Engineering Department. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of permit. Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public improvements requirements. Provide the completed application form and the requirements on the checklist at the time of resubmittal. Improvement Plans signed by: ___________ _ Date: __ _ P:\DOCI\CHKLS1\IP0001.J'RM Pagt2 of 4 REVOl/11/M BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1 stv' 2ndv' 3rdJ - D D D 7b. Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to code Section 1 8.40. Please submit a recent property title report or current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $ ________ so we may prepare the necnsaty Future Improvement Agreement. This agreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Future public imprc;,vements required as follows: __________ _ Improvement Plans signed by: __________ _ Date: ___ _ 0 D D 7c. Enclosed please find your Future Improvement Agreement. Please return signed and notarized Agreement to the Engineering Department. Future Improvement Agreement compl~ted by: ___________ _ Date: ______ _ 7d. No Public Improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or defective improvements found adjacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction of the QJty tnsoector prior to occupancy. GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS The conditions that Invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section 11.06.030 of the Municipal Code. , D D aa. Inadequate Information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading , requirements. Include accurate grading quantities (cut, fill import, export). /cofJ9t10MtL-, ):( CJ' 8b. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil ( Engineer must be Submitted together with the completed application form attached. ft{1 NOTE: The Grading Permit must be issued and rough grading approval obtained prior to issuance of a Building Permit. p. , ,, * z-..-p It/& i:#F/} 3~Z ZA-- ~ Gracing lnlpector sign off by: C 4,s:11 a/4f-Oalll: ::;j ,~&:: r::f D D ~r/9S-· E l ~--• i/~~--~ i -W-~'-~ I~ . ::µ P:\DOCi • . I REVOl/11/N \ ys· BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS ~./ 2nd./ ~rd./ )vi D D 9. A RIGHT -OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-Way and/or private work adjacent to.the public Right-of-Way. Types of work include, but are not limited to: street improvements, trees, driveways, tieing into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities. Right-of-Way permit required for _______________ _ A separate Right-of-Way permit issued by the Engineering Department is required for the follov.:ing: _____________________ _ 1 O. A SEWER PERMIT is required concurrent with the building permit Issuance. The fee -is noted in the.fees section on the following page.sEfirtfJJ"Y'r 11. INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT is required. Applicant must complete Industrial Waste Permit Application Form and submit fo-r City_ approval prior to issuance of a Permit. Industrial waste pennit accepted by:,~ Date: '%J9 { {l~,Cl-N~~_:r- Pagt40f4 REYOl/11/N , ( ' . ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING REVIEW SECTION ' . FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET 0 Estimate based on unconfirmed information from applicant. D Calculation based on building plancheck plan submittal. Address: /, S-: Bldg. Permit No. Prepared by: &:, Date: I~ 't:15 Checked by: a_§ . e49_s-o'btl s-- oate: 5/!(i:,/CJ 5 7 I EDU CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses. · // ,,, ,,. (ffpp;t! ~ 5'8t.o ;j,,/>oe, r,. o .7 Types of Use: W/lse./2wp6'--· Sq. Ft/Units: :7:-tf"~'f_~-:-1J777l" EDU's: §': 7.:J · 7 --' --7-,.-6.;___el ____ _ Total EDU's: ______ ------ ADT CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses. >4/ "~~/ct£ 336 ~ ·--ptrP() Types of Use: m .fer: · Sq. Ft/Units: 6 ~UJ . ~ ttnMI 1,(/ If $E ;:;.. },,-/ ;,.--t; -57~ t7 ADT's· ~ ·-------/l't.> Total ADT's .... J,,, ______ & ___ .3 ______ _ FEES REQUIRED: PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE REQUIRED 'r/4 YES O NO. (See Building Department for amount) WITHIN bFD: g YES (no bridge & thoroughfare fee, D NO /'\ reduced Traffic Impact Fee) /4 1.PARK-IN-UEU FEE PARK AREA: ___ _ FEE/UNIT:_____ X NO. UNITS: __ _ ~2.TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE . ADT's/UNITS: · N 3 X FEE/ADT: o< o( ~ 3. BRiOGE AND THOROUGHFARE FEE . ADT's/UNITS:_____ X FEE/ADT: ___ _ 15(1 4. FACILITIES MANAGEMENT FEE /4'-. SQ.FT.: 3 .2, /l tJO 7 ZONE:._S __ _ '{of X .FEE/SQ.FT.: ~ 5. SEWER FEE PERMIT No. 5t f'So(J t/'Y-, X FEE/EDU: /J'Pb EDU's: fa 6 0 BENEFIT AREA: G- EDU's: ::Z, C:,, () DRAINAGE BASIN: 5'°;:::: X FEE/EDU: Lk? HIGH X /LOW __ ..,.. ~-DRAINAGE FEES PLDA C ACRES: fl, :J..f' X ;ii£ 7. SEWER LATERAL ($2,500 DEPOSIT) FEE/Acf ({i//'f lj(a. WATER FEE / EDU's: 1. ~ D X FEE/EDU: ,;2 tf o 0 =$_..,,....i/.....,._V' ___ . -·'-<--./ =$_...._.cer ...... ·_._ =$ /31~6 =$ ____ 5._7? __ =$ ~3~ =$~;?p/r--_ =$ /(J-.'/o TOTAL OF ABOVE FEES*:$ o9/fp ; , *NOTE: This calculatlQn sheet la NOT a complete Hat of all fees which may be due. Dedications and Improvements may also be required with Building Permits. , P:\DOCS\MISFORMS\BP0002.FRM REV 01/04/95 s-· CITY OF CARLSBAD GRADING INSPECTION CHECKLIST. FOR PARTIAL SITE RELEASE PROJECT INSPECTOR: l) · mo01<.€ PROJECT ID P/t° 95...,()b DATE: 1-4-96 GRADING PERMIT NO._· ___ _ LOTS REQUESTED FOR REL,EASE: __ 3_8_· _ ____, ___________ _ NIA = NOT.APPLICABLE I = COMPLETE O = Incomplete or unacceptable , . 1st 2nd. 1. Site access to requested lots adequate and logically grouped ,._.......,.......,. __ t----....+----- --'-+--------- l-'-----.'-+--- f--/.,..,.+--. -----i tvA ------ 2. Sit~ erosion control measures adequate. 3. _ Overall site adequate for health, safety and welfare of public. 4. . Letter of request for partial release submitted 5. 8½" x 11 • site plan showing requested lots submitted. 6. Compaction report from soils engineer submitted. 7. 8. Engineer of work certification of work done and pad elevations. .. Geologic engineer's letter if unusual geologic or subsurface conditions exist. 9. Project conditions of approval checked for conflicts 10. Can water service be installed prior to bringing building combustibles on site. · ~ Partial rele11se of grading forthe above stated lots is approved for the purpose of building permit issuance. Issuance of building permits is still subject to all normal City requirements required pursuant to the building permit process. D . Partial rele~se of the site is denied for the following reasons: /-4-9it, Date Project Engineer Date H:\LIBRARY\ENG\WPDATA\IN~\fURMS\PARTSIIB .FRM I, · II TO: FROM: DATE: City of Carlsbad •§It·••; t44 a trt#li •14 ~st#,;, tY; ca DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING SERVICES ., ENGINEERING INSPECTION DIVISION 1-4-96 ROUGH GRADING APPROVAL FOR PROJECT NO.L0T38 t3T8/--4t:,. ;::7//J 95-0£> . (P.E. OR TRACT#) D4lLYINOt/.,z&f4L /954 kEL(.OGfi-411£. (PROJECT NAME & ADDRESS) . . l!AMM4N l!t)JJ.57R.Uffl0AJ,, 475 W..8MDL£Y.L!IIG.;, EL G4JotU,, 9,2ozo . · (DEVELOPER'S NAME & ADDRESS) We have inspected the grading for Lots ;3·8' · or Phase - of the above mentioned project. In addition, we have received rough grading certification from . d T~ IA/C. -. , the Soils Engineer, dated /Z-8 -9S- _and from S~AR .( 4SSDC/'ATG8 . , the Supervision Grading· Eng!neer, · dated 12-7~ (}S-, and 'are satisfied that the rough grading .has been completed in accordance with City Standards. · Based on these certifications and our observation, we take no exception to the issuance of a buil_ding _permit for Lots 88 . or Phase _____ of project /?IP 96 -0 5. from a grading standpoint. This release, however, is not intended to certify the project from other engineering concerns including site development, wa_ter or sewer availability, or final grading. ' . We will need to be advised prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy so that we can verify that final grading and landscaping has been completed in accordance with the approved plans for the project. APPROVED: PROJECT GRADING INSPECTOR ~ ~ .. o/.SR. CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR H:\LIBRARY\DPS\WPDATA\INSPECT\ROUGGRAD.FOR 2075 Las Palmas Drive • Carlsbad, California 92009-1576 • (619) 438-1161 © Plan Check No. _ _.___-_ Address ' Planner i3& ?:I< la a en . I PLANNING CHECKUST · · . · i:fi 7'l~·'· \:<·, ,,.· ~ . .-... ~~-·\·;: .. ::.-.:;;· · ~I 1.£ LJ I<~ JI o if ,;_ · · ,I} ~- Phone 438~1161 ext. d ./-! 1-) 7/ (Name) APN: __ £ ...... · _! ___ e< ____ -_._.&>'--1-+---<:::Z,___-=-[)-=-;;z_~---------,------ _Type of Project and Use bv:iu.£Zd4 ~~;) ((}/4 / .?V~.:5 · Zone t'/t1 Facilities Manag~ent Zone-~----- CFD Cn}out) #,-y-,.------------. ~cle (tf property m, complete SPECIAL TAX CALCULATION WORKSHEET proyided by _Building Department.) Legend []] Item Complete *' N !-1 'l':t .>( .>( t· . u u ., ., Ill \ .r: .r: .r;: D Item Incomplete -Needs your action· u u •U C C ' C "' "' Ill, -~ ~ Q, Q, a. .. 1, 2, 3 Number in circle indicates plancheck number where deficiency was ~: identified , . .. ·--.. [g tZ{ li2T Environmental ~ew Required: YES ~O _ TYPE N~ V,~ DATE OF COMPLETION: ' · Compliance with conditions of ·approval? If not, state conditions which require action. ·. Conditions of Approval_· ---------------------------~ l2l IQ] ~ · Discretionary Action Required: YES V NO TYPE ___ _ APPROVAL/RESO. NO. ______ . DATE: _____ _ PROJECT NO. ___ _ OTHER RELATED CASES: ----------------------- 'tions which require action. . ~ 0 ·0 0 California Coastal Commission Permit Required: YES_ NO~ DATE OF APPROVAL: T7 San Diego Coast District, 3111 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 200~ San Diego, CA 92108-1725 (619) 5.21-8036 Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval-~---------------------- pi~½liw;11Jiw,Jil"'ib:h-Ml!rir>rfd?·hr:i¥&:a'fi.,,..5ttii''t7frn:tt:5:i£1'5W7a;Bfr w m ::;: r m 1-t m1e••=----.,-:~f .. .• . . ., t''t,"''. [Qj (fl [kl fliclusionary Housing Fee required: YES /NO __ ._: €Effective date of _Inclusionary Housing Ordinance -May 21, 1993.) lQJ00 @J ef0 '@itzl'i:0 Site Pian: Zoning: 1. 2. 1. .. -~ 2. 3. 4. • ' r \ ' \ . ~ . ~ • ••• .,., • ·-.. ¥ 1 ' Provide a fully dimensioned ·site pl,an drawn to scale. Show:. North . arrow, property lines, e~sements, existing and proposed structures; , streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way width, dimensioned ·, setbacks and existing topographical lines .. , . · · -~ . / t • ! • ' ' 'Y t ·:: i .. ~ t .. ' . . --_ . l . . { . . ~ : .: Provide legal descripti.on of.property, and ass!=ssor's parcel number. , •' I -,· . Setbacks: Front: Int. Side: Required Required . Street Side: Required Rear: Required Lot coverage: Required Height: Required \ Parking: Spaces Required Guest Spaces_ Re9.uired \.) 30 i 3 D 1 Shown {_!)I Shown //5) I :JV I Shown 2,t) I :::Z..5 1 Shown ~5Jr • I S-0% Shov'm :<~71?0 :35 J Shown :3;;7' ;?·// '73 Shown 7 0 &'/It Shown--#4-- . .... ... . .. '.: .PLNCK.FRM City. of~ Carlsbad .95079 Fire Department • Bureau of Prevention Plan Review: Requirements Category: Building Plan Check Date of Report: Friday; September 29, 1995 Contact Name Addre.ss City, State Scott Calms Reviewed by:~~ 5355 Mira Sorrent9 Pl Ste 750 S~n Diego CA 92121 Bldg. Dept. No. __ 9_5-..;....6_0_5 ___ _ Planning No. PIP95-05 Job Name Daily/Lot 38/Kellogg Job Address _1_95_4_K_e_ll_,09._.9 _________________ _ Ste. or Bldg. No. ____ _ l&1 Approved -The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans; information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifica- tions, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. D Disapproved -Please see the attached report of deficiencies. Please make corrections to plans or specifications necessary to indicate compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. For Fire Department Use Only Review 1st. __ _ 2nd. __ _ 3rd. __ _ Other Agency ID CFO Job# . 95079 File# ___ _ 2560 Orion Way • Carlsbad, California 92008 • (619) 931-2121 City. of. Carlsbad. . . 95079 Fare Department • Bureau of Prevention Plan Review: Requirements Category: Date of Report: Friday, May 19, 1995 Contact Name Address Smith Consulting Arc High Piled Combustible Storage Reviewed by: ~ 5355 Mira Sorrento Pl Ste 750 City, State San Diego CA 92121 'B.ldg. Dept. No. __ 9 5 ___ .·_6_0_5 ---,----Planning No. PIP95-05 Job· Name Daily/Lot 38/Kellogg Job Address ...,.1_9_54_K_e_11 ..... 09....,9 ___________ -__ _ Ste. or Bldg. No. ____ _ D Approved -The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans; information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifica- tions, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. igi Disapproved -Please se~e the attached report of deficiencies. Please make corrections to plans or specifications necessary to indicate compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to-tR-i-&bu1/d1~ ~-~ for review. For Fire Department Use Only Review 1st -------2nd --~ 3rd _____ _ Other Agency ID CFD Job#_---"-95"'""'0;_;_7.:.;;_,9 __ File# ___ _ 2560 Orion Way • Carlsbad, California 92008 • (619) 931-2121 ~~ • 'T-Req µ ir:ements Category: Building Plan Check ·95079 Deficiency Item: Pending 04 . · Additional Fire Hydrants Additional.fire hydrants shall be provided. Contapt the Fire-Prevention Bureau for locations or provide a suitable site plan on which tentative locations can· be indicated. Hydrant spacing in single family tesic;fential developments shalLbe 500 feet. Spacing in industrial, commercial and multi-family residential projects shall be 300 feet. T<he Uniform Fire Code Appendix Ill-A has been utilized to · determe th~ required fire flow and number of fire hydrants required. · Deficiency Item: Pending 05 Water Improvement Plans Submit wat~r improvement plans for review and approval. Defiqiency Item: P e·n d Ing 11 Knox Box Knox-Box required when access to or within a structure or an area is unduly difficult because of secured openings or where immediate access is necessary for life saving or fire-fighting purposes. Th~ Fire ·oept. will determine the location for the key box and provide an authorized order form . . Deficiency Item: Pend Ing 14 Provide Technical Report To determine ~.he acceptability of technologies, processes, products, facilities, materials and uses attending the design, oper;:ition or use of a building or premises subject to 'the inspection of the department, the chief is authorized to re·quire the owner or the person in possession or control of the building or.premises to provide, without charge to the jurisdiGtion, a technical opinion and report. The opinion and report shall be prepared l::>y a· qualified engineer, specialist, laboratory or fire-safety specialty organization acceptable to the chief and the owner and shall analyze the fire-safety properties of the design, operatiQn or use of the building or premises and the facilities and appurtances situated t~e.reon, to recommend necessary changes. Deficiency Item: Pend Ing 29 High Piled Combustible Storage Storage in closely packed piles shall not ·exceed 15 feet in height, 12 feet on p;:illets or in racks and 6 feet for tires, plastics and some flammable liquids. If high piled stock piling is to be done, submit a complete storage plan and description of the commodities to be stored. Show compliance with Article 81 of the Uniform Fire Code. Deficiency 'Item: Pend Ing 31 . Qther Permits Required Permits are required for the following: public assembly, candles or other open flame, welding, compressed gases, dust production, combustible fiber use & storage, flammable finishes, hazardous materials use & storage, dry cleaning, rnotorvehicle repair, medical gas dispensing, · industrial ovens, combustible storage, high-piled storage, refrigeration equipment, flammable·& combustible liquids, gases and aerosols (use; dispensing & storage). Deficiency Item: Pending . 33 Plan Revisions Page 2· Please submit 3 sets of corrected plans direc,tly to the Building Department for routing to the appropriate depl:!,rtments. 05/1'9/95 • · SEE MORE STRUCTURAL CALCS IN REVISONS STRUCTURAL CALCULAilONS PAIL Y INDUSTRIAL BUILDING Prepared by: HOPE ENGINEERING 6363 Greenwich Drive, Suite 210 'San Diego, CA 92122 619/457-4358 May 5, 1995 HE Project #95030 , ...................... __ .................. . ... ·•·············· ..... -.................. .. ..... .... . ~ ..................... . . --... ~---'. ···--··:. ~. -···: •' ...... -....................... · ..................................... , .... .. ... ., ................ ·~ ... . . .. ,. ............................................................... . . . .......... ~· _ ... _' ·-·· .......... _........... .... . ... . ......... . . . -.. .. ......................... . . . . : ' -.--. -~ -I ~ : • • • • • -! • ,. •• ., ,,.,.,.,. • • • • ••• .. ,,, ........... ,.,, .. • • ,.,. •• ,. •• , • • "" • .................... · ............................. : ..... _ ......... . -. --' ' ' --1 .t• ·<·---~ .. --·. ··r···. --•· __ .. ,_ .. ,_ .............. _ ....... · .............. ·· __ .,. ·· ............ ".,· ···· · .. ~:-=:=.:·.:'~ -L:.,!, tf~-~j~_.:: .. "'~;. ........ . ...... . .; .. , .. ,. ~,, .SHEET NO. . pf .. -. . • . ~,·1..:'-"'· . ,~, ........ ~-r-i::::,~L JOSTITlE -~ '1 ~-•ir-.. ' ' . 't::/G.0-80' JOB NO. , ___ .,._ L... -_ I_ -_ ,--, ' --~- --~ ~ -_._ -'' ' -------,_ ' ' -----' ' -- · ~, t:.t_ . ~F t::>eAt::,. Lo~ CP=tF) ~ - ' ' --··------ ... ~--- ' .. ,··" •, .,. -: -t ,-~ . !-. '.. • I t ,_ -- ' ' ' > ~~ -· . ---- ' ' ... Fc:bFJN6ii. -------~----- ~11. FLYW t:!>; ---------- . lN$.iU.TbN .---,---_,...,.,..,-- . -~tNJ4-B~,-----~------"''--,,----,- derL1~ ; . . . "IV'f,1,..-~ . .,:,.~ .. ---------.....:.....~.-:. -;? . ··:,.j-·-AA!1 ·t:;?~ C... "'-X a.or ~ ""• -. . , ---------------f?Q F{-I M 4G ~ .81 o,c. ____ _ ~Jp~ ---~---'--------• i ... . . ... F1L~1~:--: _____ · -,---------·-···__,--.-_,,..> -· ~-· __ : --· ___ ; ' · . J~11 ·N, W"T, ~._· ---.-----. ~-,,,•I FL ....... _,.., --.. ·---. . . ff , I ~ t:>, ··-. ------'---- . ".Ff?A[~IN~ '_ .. _, _· ---~- _-'Sf"¥JN~EPS ----..;.....,-- c~rL1 NGi ----,-------,-- -__ :_ MJ~, 2,~ I, S o,S J.o l, e, I. 0 i:::J, 1 -I, 0 I. 'S . [.-~ 1~.s ~' -s ~.s I, o .l, e, o,q -,- t:> .. L . Cf.o lo.t:' 11.5 t:=>, L . ZE!!>,O L.L. T.L. '20.0 ~q.o ltb,o ,z~.o 1'2 ,0 ~:3.S L..t..., i,L., ICV,c:J , I~~ SHEITNO. D~ . ' LoAt;:!): - _, ----__ ,__ --'. ·--' .. -• __ _,, • ' -t--'..I • .; .. ---, ' ·-•; -·-- ,-. J.-ex~~L.U:=2E. B -~· :~Je:=-ier:> -~ ME:Trk::o _·~.~JC WINe» ~e~ .76 MPH _·4·. ,~ANO¥-P ~~Cj". OF ____ _ q~_ 4_,1 __ qs· ·HT, Ce <=:t, is .I -F .. ..,.._ -;--, ---+----t---""'----+------t---"----+--~----1- :.:k,".. .. ~o· o,if;7 1. '? 1~. U?· I, o l I R;F" +·--~-:~-:-~-~7·r-~. -r->~--j --:· .-____ -· ' . -. -~-~,; .· ¢£1~l''1'1C _" 1, . z.::::,r-JE 4 . . . ' -.·:_··-~. : :l: . . : --~.--· -C ·. :"~ -~~4, :" .. :F~ I .'. F ;: . /!!,?, j.J t> I ---··· ', -• ~ ; 4 - ' '. ---. . -. ---- SHEET NO. .fi:::'., I . · . Jo·~ fine· '. 'b41t.:f IN~-rF2fAL. . ENGR. . ·: ...... ·z.pp· ' I. ·-.,...LI~. 1...., -~:X A. . .. . '7 II •• !'.'!":_,c ... ,~ru:::;;C-r-,.. "'T €. ..:-f 0, ~, .. ~ t :..-,: --L:· . 1. / II -~ c:,_i· . . l'n~--~ ~ ',.-. ' !~. = 7, C/~ ' .. l.J -(Cf+ Z.o)C.z.) = 5'8 Pl-F . . . v~. ·= .w·p :: {.sa)(,7,8,8) lz. -~·2.1 n: . ·a . _ _ M_~· ·:/;· .:'fl! := C. GB)C7., 88) -z. / 8 ; Ll/51 , __ l!F" -(. 2~ 7 )t.. 4s/1_,.) (. 7;se,#J I I, 7 ex;, -· ·f'!""'~-• '-1-. ... "='' ."::ii'. '/I\} _,,_ ·-' ---.. ' -'· . -~ ' " --OF.:....· ~--'-';;__.;,--. . . . -~so~--. ' . ~, -- DATE 4:_ ,e.;~ ~ts. .. :·. ~e MIN .. -:z x 4 a:z 24" o.,c. ·v tr: hLL, = J./2.o > MAU-, ::: 4~'-tt > • -I I /tJ..t.-, = S,'{-IN X zzct'rt 4SI , • .,; ~.!> iN-+ • l • : ............ :··:·· SHEETNO. ,?2 .. ; .; •.•• : •. :. -i· ' ,· . . .... OF_· ____ _ : :_ .. ;11····-•··:-·'. -~ ·:. -:·-: _ . Joii'i'm·E bf\H;.:(· fN~Jf?t;AL :_ .... ~--=----~---·· -~: .... --~-~ :· ~--'·ENGR. . ~e:j;:) JO~ NO. -. :'.]J:ro~·; DATE 4-:-I:&>-: ·t;i.$ .. ' "HQ.,;E. E:N~l'KlE'ERING. . . . . . . ·.,.;...;.··+·=·..:....:. -::.::::....:.--.:.::. :..:.:.-::..: ...:.:·~:..::.·...:... '-.. CHECKED BY_--:.--'---:.-'------DATE -s'1--i·ucc-i-ur'·a'1·1fi--n'~'.1ne·ers· .: -------· -~ . , --, , , . , __ l ~ . ', I ~,_ _ •)', -_. •' , • , . I . .. . -~f . "TPL.1'3SE ~ e -0 11 . o,. c.. .,. . ~"TW~-.. G;:I~ 0t-@) : ~ _.,_ . , . I :-_ ~• .L ~-.. • ~ · :.~2 ' -~·---..1---~ . -~ -t' :: { I c, of I ft::,) (_ a') = w · · · -· / lo) C '). -D,L,~---. ·" -6 _ ,!!$0 pLF c !!>o) (;g,,z;.J / 2. = 1. '3 11- -(~p-8){-S'Z.')/z. :: '3.~"' . (. ' )1-/ ,_ ~ C. 2c?8) '32. /8 = '2"1-. t, . -. ~ ' --• ~ <-· -• ' . ... L ... • --·-•• ---~-... ----.-<~ .. '. ·,·--·-·,· •• ' : ; ). '_j .. . ~-~---l • ~' --~ i • ... ...... . ,.,_,_ -~ --:--~ --'._ .: .·t ~-_; sz·' ~JJ7 ·· ::; Clo+l~)(tl) ---2.oB pt..F ·ws::>,L.. •.. ~ (. le, )C: ~) :; Bo p~f . y_i;;_,t.. .. _ C.Bo)l.t;;z') /Z ::::. '7-, 1. -K. : _ _ Y~ .. · -. (_ ~ e,)(_ sz') /z . .::: ~. 4 " · use TT 4-4-Z. e a_!, o,c., c: 2el ,:;,esp> I " USE=-TT44-Z. e &,_oo,c.., l .ft!!:,'' c;,e.e.p) N~E:. :: FINAL-ci;Mple-ie. ~,.AM~ ~-~l~Nr;.C, C...~. R;:~ M-6-NUf • -.. ,;-, __________________ ........_ ______ ___ , --~ I . -· I · _, SJ:>.A.N ::: 17 · , . -, . I . --~: -T~ I-, :: t;;J 1-11, : L2 WT' = -~c. /Z_X l'Z) SI t-,J i::.. • .1 .... ;; c I z) C {; 1) . ~I. : •.·U' I ·-'./~.l-. = w-fJz. = (.~Jo/.>/2-.: 5.2.lt!. -' --~ -. ' ..., -· ~ V.7', ~. .:, w-f/2-:: (.1,2).C 11 )/2 = Jo. 2 ~ MJ:>.L,-·= w:.12-/8 = · (. b)(ti>2'/a __ 2.1, 7 ,_ 1e. M,-,L.r :;: f.d// B, · =. (/, ~)(./7)'/!!,_ ;:. t..j'3, 4 1 _ If:. I ... (.t.1)CM) ( L) /EE. --~· --(2. 7) ( '13. 4X. 17 ) l l8t:?O , __ .: /1 1¢'1 _ 1',.i+ ·---~ : ;-~--·-:-.--,·--·h< ~'. _, ' ' ' r ! ' -, ~Me,Ff! I c:. H t::J.L .. , -(L.)(lz) : .~x-~ -· X M--r,L. 180 OF ____ _ DATE -°1,0'.f!a. . : . 4-_·2e~~s VAL-I.., -:: Jo.er"' > lo.z" .,-/ ,_,c_ > 4'-1'-~ M AU-. :. -= c.- I t-1U.., ::: 11 t:/2o -> 11 I o1 . ', ~ :. Yz 11 . 'f JN -SHEET NO ... F..4 OF ---. --- . .. JOB NO.. ~'S,t'9i'.? , -·Jos-~m~ : -~LY. 1ND-Jsn:=£1,A!.. eNGR·--·.,---_____ ·_-=·--...a..--z~. _,_E:..c-:-t:?'-',..~--=--DATE ff:.-~ ... g_t;; -~•- ·HqPE--ENGINEERrNG -... c-",-·: -=-~---'-'--,-.;.:_ ·-..:...: 1 :.::.. ..::. __ :..::..·:...:.. :...:..·..:....,-'-_____ CHECKED BY-'---~------DATE • · ,S--t r-u--c-_-t u r a I · E n g 1-n -e e ( _s -. ----· · •· --~ .. r-J <SpA i,.L-,. <,J,- Wc,,L .• Vp,J.., Y.7:.~. -_,. = :as._ · =-;;,• ;; (.;~ X /Z. )(SJ') : _ (. IZ)( ~ 11) = .:;; w-f/.--. z._ --C, 6)(_ ~-G)/z :::. It?,_$ K vJ.ll -(.j, i) {.'$S")/z. . Z..I Jc.· .;:: -... z._ = - -= C·6>t~~)2-/$ .. :::.· qz'-k.. Mo.L. t1-r, '-' = (/, 2){3S-)·/8 _::.:. /8"1 ,_ ~ = _ (2.7)( M)<_L-) /J8oo_• -== (-2.1>c1s11>tsi$)Ji~- q -· . --;_j'i _ _ 6"-0 , - . , _ :_ 1 _ ,-·;. _ 1~-ct[µiJl.,,_ ~ .:SHeAg, .. -.~A~ _ 4!>r-! _ --~· _ .f2~p_~_n_E;M_e,e;z. .. -.. - . C /. z k/, Yt~~ 1) "= -a. 4,K . . V . -. '" . -· . 'IC" ' _ /£ --= ~.I -:,;, ~-. = 17. s V,,,u... == '2.o, 6 ~ > 11.S I{ MAU-, -= /10 1 -l<. > l8t.f'-~ I AL.-l.--, = I '3., t,/CC) > 1 (:,bo ;,,fl , ' c:. ;::; I J., z. II SHEET NO. :f2: 5 ~ . . . . JOB TITLE : b,blt y .. IN.btJ'$1PlA1-JOB NQ __ .,_St'?=· ~~=f2~·:· ~ ' --.-,__ ' ENGR-;..., . ....a.·"""·-'-'-'-'----""-'. -..::;,Z.::.,.;:--e~·-:.Ji. 0-,::::. --'-. ____ ·DATE CHECKEDBY ___ -'-------DATE Jt:.fJ' J . . 5 ~1, . ---• ~·-,---,---..,1··· • ______ 1 _________ ,_, ~-__ -. V_t;,,11.:.. -.. c;_~JC _g~)/z . . -~--8. 75 -~-~ -· ·:~.-~t-7.iD.:: .. ;.._ <. iJ<. ~_s-) J-z ;: 11.s-)L --~1-~. -'.~-- _ -'JE,1:r· l.0:JL_·· _ ,~-.t. s-;c '3S-)/8 . ! ' ' . . . -~~-':-~: ~ . 1_., Jl-zs)J. 1a. . ' t ! ' ' __ .,' ..... --~ - .·. ·: ·: 1.fi~·:·~ =· _·. <., '4,,-1){ 11)(.~) j.JSoo -~:. -~--·. ·· .. _-~-·:~·-:~-:::-~: -:.~--' . C 2 ,-; )[ I ~3) ( '36') I I&~ · • I ' J f ..,., .. _;::= .. : :-.~:~-~--~;--: -~ 80:32, J,.J . ·<--f·+·:J,-:-~ _;_ }·JJ~--~~T~:" -ri ·: "' .L,._ .., ___ , __ ,_ ~' --- ' : \ . . . :-r , --, ···: -,--------- . ' ..,, ••• --·;---i---:·--- ' ----...:--.--: .. ~-,---·!---· - ----'-~ 1 __ ·;"'" . ,-. ,_t_. --,--- -__ , ---. --. ' . ___ .,_ __ '... -~ -· ' ' , , , . 4--i~~°IS ' ~~,.:.,.-_ .. I .. ,. --~.:"---2 S -tt:t..:: .·:: • ~:t· WT .. ~ ·c,z + f2)(4z') :: I K/, · Wo.~--; c.12) (4:z') = o,t,;" "1, • . .¥fb.~. .:::. Co..5)l ·z:3,) /z _ -~Y.i.~i:, · -· ~ . (.. /'. <2)C '2.3) / z . lit:. //, '7· ·r1.P,~•. ·-·co,$){_,Z~~,~ _ '3Z, I I-IC. ·.J'C'f.·.:,. L.... ::;.. . (./, 0 )C 2-3) 2-/ 8 = ~. z I-" " --~ ' ,_ -~'-" . ' . .. ~ -i : ; ; __ ~-! __ OF .... -- Jqs N_o_: . 4So~-, __ . -· -D-11.TE . 4-:.:26,~'f?12 : YAU,, -/ 2 ,,, "° > If, ~" M "''-'"-· -7t:,,q 1-t > ~.z'-u.. •c.f-r "&,/ 10 > 2.1 2.8"1 tN -I-A .w,., ::: :. c.. -I II _.__,. ,---~----r ~-.-; .... -:- ··'-~:-~-~ ·• I• .; ~' -• •• • ., , ,, _ _;.,.,.,. -+ V: C'' -',O, •' • · ~ ---,__ :-... ' -I -· '. '_ :; - ' t : ~ ... ,-t· --~i'.'f: p; .f ,z> c -i:i' :>;;; :r/r. . . -~;. -~~--~~~e~i~£ ~ -;~ .. -, --"'; · r:::;t:1-;--;··-::--:--· __ '. __ ,. __ -. --~-·-~ -~ * --~ ~ --• ---~ ,_;_.,;~ ·~,-:. _: -·-: ___ , __ --. ·----· -:-- ·-:'.-_ ~~~~§:i~f~ _ -'.-61)(5'0)(~;):~~-:-Czi)c_:4<i) -c.17.5)( s) -.!, -.4.0 . -·sHt::&6 -T· '--.-~-0 .:5~.H~ .r0 · ~- 1-f, B = .· (z,Y + c 1)(5') e,-' .:: #;+4 .;_ 2~ -,-: --\ -~--~ '-· ----,-!- . ·. 'MqM~-~t~ ~; ·M, ·•. . K . . . (I)( 5)Co/z) • -I,(. e ... 17,5 · (5) + -/00 -.. -,-Mz·· .... ---0 .. 21.t C: ~j + Cl)(.~)( 'o/2) -17 -'-~ I . s, Ms,Mft-fz .. ( 1)(4-ol )~ ,_ I.!. --2CO I . J.C. !4C:>-:. ' ' .!.. ., .... OF~.~-,---,.-'---.;._,--, .J_OB NO .. 'f}Eo~--.l ... . -·4--2B-:9G~- -.. -.--.... --~ -,-- .q>ATE., ® . ' .- \ : -·:·-:-· ----,--r ·--..,.--.--~ --(~------· . ·:· ... !. .. • ... ' ., ··'- ~i-. ( ,_ j__ • ..:---~--} I ' ;._ -i-L. .. ~~~-rr·~--~~rs ;_. -<~--: .. '. .tL \ :U-;. ~L~~~ ~ • ' ·----~ -) --i.--'. ... -.!-~ , --.., •. _ _i_ l ·---; ·-~-: __ -__ -___ i.-:~-·- .... ·~ •.. L -; .. ..:: _L_',--~;..:...,. -·- ---,--,. - !, ~ :-___ .) ____ _,.,.._ •'•· ~'. ' -- \ ' i • j . . ,.· -·:· ~/1.C~ -.r_Jto~ >!-.. 4"~ _ '. ,'. l:a,oo .. : • -· , · t ; -: -. . --;·-c" nee:'f".:J -.--.. ~ -----~r-;--·4-+--f-~ ----:-...;,~ ___ -0_. ----------• ---- , .. -..;-, --........ ....;,_._-;,_--i-..-.,.l._-r---+-_--,.._, • .---. ______ .,......._ _________ -· -___ ..) .. '--------,....,_ '. , : _-.,..' . ~ -- ,-· -'·-'"'·--~----~-·--· ~.- -_: •• _: ... > 0.1-. ot-Jl'() --·t-·. :- -.---t . ,-, , . I ' --~ ·-.. ---: ___ ,. __ : .. \ .. ''7' ,-,.,_,. . ----- ( z:i)(~od~ ( ~ )C ~') / Sro (40)( 12.) !Bo X V Af../.., :: -2-':7, 81<.. > z s .t M·~t;L.. 21-f s'-'< > l'-1&1 -k. . .I ,:iµ.. = X o,'5' JI ~ ; (~Xj1 17 :z')· 1i r,,:7-r / '-~ ' -/..2 (~~'i)(. ~:z.)~/$.' = ®. ---· ' S~-.. ~AN:. ::::. -i-,-+·:. .. -~I.,,.! . L-~·, .- : I -r-s· ~ ,- :_ ~ 1 -v~. -n~ -,~!,:' -r·-, ----I ; CJ~+ I~) J'S = ---#/, '31:2- -------- C:'31,z.){. 5i)Jz. ::: 81 I .1o::: ( '2-1~ )lSZ.)/& .::. .I O-~, -~- ( z.1)(, /O~a?O)(%) /I 8-oc -' ' ' ,_ ~ 4t,,,_"' -... ... · I 11 II 1./S;c 5_¥. -/C2. LJ -~ -1:----£?-X c;;,,, c:::r,-,,:;;;;-._ - \-.. ' ~ -~·--VAu. = L.-n: tfl,t · > s:, s ~: -J: }14~. :£ ~t,,,/ "> 4bJ.-'~. I A'-'-· :;' ~if q o > '2-Z'a,7 :,~'+- \/1,U.J-:::: /7, q J£ > ,B, I Ac MAU,= _ /42.'-IC. > '°"'-~ -L14-i.l-, = 8qlo > 52"8>,~4 ---! --'~--' : ... ~----~. r---!- = -cz.i )C. M )Ct-) Ii~ ::-_8 o Bs: i-',:; '! ~ ' I V 1iJ..L.., t1 AJ.J-• IAI-L• ; -\., _, /$,t:::JIC > /0 K. -/~5'--"-> l~'-1-·-ltt... --qsqo > 80S'S/N41 ~.c::_:: i.i:::-! I ; ' -~-;--1 ;-- ·+·--'.~· ',, . .:.;-:--:--- -;---: -i --:~·-t . ~j--::· 1 · -~~ ),. Jj --~ .. ~ '. ~ ' . j __ L. _: .. 4 ~ __ J. · ... L _· -:--r _J,.-:-~---~-;- ' I -;-... ..o;-_.L._'_ ;-,- I i I ; :=tT-T 1-, :-, -; ' ' ,_.J_,._ __ -:--.,.J -,--.-:, ! I I • ~ i" -!~ .. ___ t -~ .. _...J_ • --/ -·: --'--i-J ......... ,.. ~l-__J_;_ ...:___;. -~ ( ' ' --r ;--~--. ;--r---~-,. -~r--~- \" ' ' 1-r; r: ;--rr-r-, · · 1 ~--,--~---+- ... ---·' -"'·-~: . i---.. ,· <. {--,~ ~--!--r - ' ! : ' ___ .,.l __ .,,,., , __ , __ -1 , ••• 1 ..... .;.,...... ..... 1--,-·,--· -----_,.,__,,, · .. -·. _,_ __ ... \.,, r ~ .,.._···,· \ ' :--~-0 ~--.·--...... 4... ' ' ·' + '. i, F.: ii IA?'' ± -+ i~l11YP. ,i_. t L .--:~CGNe-, ~a ~~ .. 4f X. 8, -~e?- '~'-----~ ..... • ..... -.-} . 1--+ _,..__ -- .,. -..... _ . .~· ,._ ., '! ) ' __ ., ~.--~------·' -,---,·· --·- _., --·. J_ '-· '---~--... -•-----,-.·----· , ' -• -~--~ ·• ,--r• ! ' • -,.,.. '.., -' -·-, tM:J~~J _: __ j-_ ·, - -i~j.tJC)~1)-----=. ' ... _1 ____ • ,, o.42-> --:. -1---~~ ~-J ' , --~-··-,-:-·· :-·-,-' - --. -. ;.. -, ___ ; '-·-----' -- -•. ·- ~: ' --'*'. '27S'o ,,_ #= Cf·-625 -.. ---. I If i -~1~:2.5 -,,,__ -T Co,Ss:.)(:d.) · T Co.,Bs)(_/ ~) I • ---__ : __ , -:fF -T-;:.--~O"/t:::J --., . ,,_ 1~N $1c,,J-,f;,Jf:.fZ. ~I a~~o 4S'"CXJ --/,44 > I ·O r,Jo 6{ooD ( -_ ''?:> i~o.·-__ op~ \ J_d,7 ---r --;;;,, y I , z > .L c;:, NO qoor> II· I If ._, U.S,r;. 4-3~ X %_ X Yz_ X I -q LJ / 3 -¾!,r·cJ, A, SoJ..TS -. o.'1>1~ -' _ _,,_ __ . ___ _ --,:-..J-...... --,.._ --, ' --!~+~--~~----- ··-·,··I .. , ___ --, ---' ... W-T---~--( 1'28)(. l,·,j-/) _, J7o ·#'/, V~ ~-~. . {. /Jo) l -?P.) /z : 1/7 K , _; -.' .. ~- i. \ ·--.... ----- :, _ t,Jj-··H:. . . -.,.'--' /c>O ~f .·:·_:us.e . TJ1 60 c. '2.p''··p~ -.... ===============:;:::::::t:;;:::;;:~ ... ~-' . ' ' r1.t-l.AL ~fl-BiE 4 Sl~N.~v u~. ·-~ MMuf, • / , '. "i-'"T_. __ -·'-l ·•,, >-, -• -- ···i· ·'# ~, --· - Ii$':~ l=r ~ , -_: t;:: ~ .' 'If .::; ' . ,. .J ... J_ .. _._ Joo-/~.,t..::; s.~:-~/· ·-.t. C ••• ,...,._ --:-•-,.-- c. ' ' ,' .. , ·-,--' . -L •• ~-I r . • ,. .J .• ·"'J •. ,.e,. ·; :~~::~~ :, __ > -~~r:fi:-~~-;:d:--_·ca,1,)c11Jc:..,:>/ii .. -... :: · .. , / ~=~:--. ~ ~~--~ : .. -:-~.;.;~: =i=~Z$, w.) C r0 4)-.¢.i-~>/}i~1:;,·¢:;:i·;: r-br1~ iJit ;;r: l I --,-i . ~---.. . -.. _,_,__,_ -. ' __ ! ,-._ .... ---:-1--,, ·/·. ·-··;-··--r·---. ·--, -,·--,·----1--'.--t··..1, ___ . -,-·A . t, .. ,~·; -,· --::------- _-J, :-· - : . .. . .. · _ . ~· Gl& ,Alptli>; 61211::>@ :· -• 1 • -__ ; .. _ ... _1:_-~-r~h~Lr$?.fP.::, @)3.. e·--· . · - ' I ~ ! I > I l ( . l f > ' , ~-.. ···---~---4 .... -, _______ 1 __ • --~ ~ ,. ----• ... _.:~:·if:.~t- ' T,.A_1··-:{ ~-~ FT.... > ISc? FT-i..- L;i;_ ... :£ &,t; poF . ' w -__ .::: C:26+ 8&,.~ j 1,' = I, 8 ll../, ~1·. ----'-· (. •n\• - ' ~--. ,..,, •• -.! -" -·~ ' k. Jq,2, - I ;:.~ . (t. ~.)LJ,f>. )· .. : 15', 5."' -.-·- ." . . . -· ... r· .I II 'I/ . ' ' ;\".-Use ~r~-~>(. z q_ · GC1~t:=-~ V1tu, = ./~. erk > ,~.~'t: _:· .: M ~u.... :;;. I IL/ ,-r > I ol!f} ,~ic., Zr~ . .:: 91Do > 47qt,/1J"I use . ~~-t,!'j .. -~-(;. : -L.: ~ . -=j:: --~~i£~{~ .. ,( /~)? 16'> :: . . Jt/, J •. '3 .... . ·.v ·-l,J._ ~1-~ ·. .... ·• . ·It... ~ .::. . j (p I t, ., . _··.,:,t~::: I Jb·'-¥- QF _______ _ . JOB NO .. QATE .c:lt:;,o;So· . - . i::; -'-:-21s. ··· .A:;rr1JA'-SHeAf.2.. ::.. ,~.41 '<_ (zis,:.>( 1); ; /'J,'-lk •. I , _ :· -=.viu... =-· 1-L/. Cf~.>-13.4-1< ~_-:_.··_ .M~w. = Joi'-~> c;--'-'-K : Lpu., = 48bc> > I ~e£3 ,~~ 1 . . A.bf. ~' . -.:()--- .-( 3 .. 1:,j(/1 o, t:xx::>)l ~e:,') /I Boo f;1Z-o -- ' I V11w.-::-/~//_1<. > 1;,'31< 1 Mt1r-'-'--.: 11~'-k >JJo -r t:il,.L:: S'1o0 ,°,.J'f ) 57 ZO 1'rv'-I _ <I ::,~:;:::cz-.o~( J.,7~ ") - 1 ' ' ' ' ( ' .. , .,.--., . :······--r~· --, .... , . . -:'- ::_ -~,: :i~i! 1· = .-:,·r-.. II -IF ;;,;;;OO. ,, --·-·· ··-··--"-............ ·---· ----------·---'-1 ·.' -. : .k--re,'.·· ·=- . -.,,., ', BoL-7 -- --. " · t, i'S ){. ~ '-.>l I~) OF _______ _ -- , . o,"'-. ,', o,k, , . . -: ·'-·: . '• •·----• •L • --,.,.. . ,..--- i --r·-!--~ · 1 , ,4_ .I.. ' ¥:- , 1 •'v..,.....•• ,., -!,._... __ _ -.;_ ....,_ - ~~-{--. ·-·-· :--"' --. ) ··-, -- ) ...... : --'· : _., __ _,_ w -; _____ :,..__. __ ; ' ,,_ ;-.,..,. • ->-'-r• -_,.. ____ ....,.._ -j•-···--' :•· -,---,;---__. ! -. · -: rl--~-tI:r-:-·-:~ TT·i-: t --, --'1~_.,._ ; , __ --~ --. '_ ,,__..., --' -, ' --1: --r-, ...... ,t,,. -·'--, ..... -~ -·---1· - ' __ , < l.o • • o. k, ,.-. -·-'..,.. --i- i ' ' --._j ---;-, ........ ,-!-' '-·' .• --L---,-"'! ..... --- ..... -t-~-~-.. J-· l, -"·1· -·~ ..... , ~i • _ • . : '-J•,r•'-·-/-.~ 1·-,--~~~-:--..:-, ;--~-;-~~~~-~-:--;·:;rr·~~;.:;".·::~-+=~--~:~:····=: '-·---~-~':_:; -,-.--~ ,: ·<· '....-!-t..j-1-..J-I---!.. +-L~-l-~_k'......:,. -i--------h,~?"'-:-:. -:--Li-,2-',,<;J'-·'-...!-.! .. ,. --L. ~-· ~-: .. --'. ---~ -·· .J-~~-+-,~-~~t. ··= . , +I ·'--" .. ,:,. _1 -'-~ ;"" ;.F'5' !_ · ' r: . +z >< 12-:·-1-½--!·-~-; ·, ...... ·-·+- :,=tt.T-~-~"'~; -:i:-.:""t4JJ2-. ' ' ' ' . ---------·-. . ... · .. '· .. ~ ~rt:.!· ~o;~ =l~ ,)(~)a. :~--,G~~su-..:.~ J. ' .• ,c. z.' -4 --' ·-:, • I ) I •• ; -; -.---.·--,.__._ ..... --·: --' --' ---- ,----'~ .... -· i;;;,1·-'.-----f-2. -1-·.,1, ___ .. b ... (t:: -:~ ---·(.,7~)l%a,o)l-l1 ) ----... 5811 < . 7t;;'' , . -------. ~ ·- --·-··~.., l OF ' -· ! ~ -' ' ! ·•~•· --•--·: J I ~ ·: ! ; -~: ~os: NO:.-~; -~~:1sa-st{~.i-Tf-~. ~ · :s~~ ·i_;.· -or~tt . . . . .. b~A_jT ' l • ' ' , I ---. . -· -~ _ .... ; ... -r. : ... - -~~ -:ci~J~ .. ---· ·-'-...i-, , I • ,_.. ___ r· " '3 l 1z11 'I _,._.: __.!. _, __ ..L ...••. ' ' -:-!-· .,._ ' --~ ·' -.: - ___ 1_ -, ---) • .L • i....... ·-, , _ ___; _j_ __ L. . •. ..{ -.. I ' _, -' ... ~~ ~ ,. ·-·-1,--:· • I • . I ,----:0-~ :---· _ i __ ' -.-.. -- __ ,....,.._. ___ ,,..., - ! , : I : , ' 1 :: ::~f,11;r:f ~, :3~.JiJi;,~. -· 1 __ ' --~r~. ! ' .... -~) .... !-· ~-,~ -, -- .. -_i ____ l __ , .... -;-.. -- ' ·, -!--, ~; ;_ ..... ··;81'~·.· -,. ·(::i+:k:·1+ 1.1~'l.-I... .... vv.· . F~:· '_j __ : .. ' .. ' ··:---:--:-- OF_,,..,.,._,,.,,,..,,...~....,..,="""':=' ft~.~-Irr·~~--: JOB NO. D~TE DATE ~s ~-f; 4-~·.: ~- r : : ·-; __ l__~~- -1 __ ; --1-~; . . '. u~:e .. ~11 er xx -sr~ P1~· . 'PA~. .:: I.I ~ IC -' ~ ,i ' / ·--, --,;-- -· -' "··~ -' ___ )_ ·-·-' , ' .'.:) -,·· --· ._ __ (_. --- ~ '>) -,-;-·-T• r 4-__ , __ 1,M ..... t .. -· -·--.-.... 'l--~J--:-1-1~~-.. ;--.:-1--r • ___ ).....;.,_...:, --'-4...J~ •. I w~_4. -· ~ . --r .--, -L-1~ . ~--r----~'-'-~ ! t < • / • I 1 __ '· -,-·1· ~ - ·'-~i=c;,~di, · __ i.~}/-·-_4zo pf;i.l · Jo-'.><:1·o • C . . . --· &-z.o''-1P .... f-~ ,·,, .-~. . -. ----~--~--'~· ~< _;:_(Bu=>) a/). ~-1 I ~ '. • • .:=t ~G-7-s-X·~X, '~· . -- .. J. l ! I I f ®l~ ' ' ' - i ~ ··~ I -I ·t -i-- -l J .. , .. ! I . -_-}-' --, l '·';·· -t ' l ' -• LI SHEET NO. ____ _ OF ___ __, ____ _ JOB,TITLE-,--P.~~='=L,;__,_:Y_l~N~bl./$~"""'-''7 ....... £2:......J/<.<..~-=-- -ENGR._----'-''-------"---z--" __ J.:..e,--"_=j::>'-'-_ -'-----DATE CHECKED BY_~----------DATE 61..~ . l,J I LL -s-rp.u:~ il.J P.E SLe A~e> Be. ANAL. y~ AS ONE Me~N1r-Je l..AT~L-L.o.t.~ -4-1'1-<45. -•, ~~-__ , ___ ---,--...-----,---.--, l •,-I~ • ---·.1· .-,_-. -~ ;::z.i-s~l'I N C:::~1·1~ Bii..Jr-,f,' WINO 4= -~E:.l'Sr"HC.. I a4Ar'l?e.: -ro -~~N csuc.-H --~:,NP· · eve:12-r A~ F.Ajle:;, -;,.;-~ i -• ·-w~' I .-~-C. ' ~ J -~-L.t:? W INt;::) ~~ ~AN jo i::75-p-r' H • • f.ta-1 Lb r~-~ov~,.J "it-+~~H-~a..lT THe. l,JE. ~AU... ~GtN· SHEET~O. L'Z OF ____ _ JOB TinE .'Q;I 1,-::(. _l~,::eL6:k JOB NO. ·::i·So3c, 4_ 1e~ ,:::irs ENGR-._--'-'-.:.....,_·z_.:.!,;..F__;i;:::>_·_-__ DATE . :HOPE ENGiNEERING _.:...:--:--~ .-': _:_ ~ -:..::.. ::.. _:, ..:.. .;.:. -· -~ ----_ _ _ CHECKED.BY:----:------,----DATE · S · t r u c t u ·, a I E: ·w g i n. e e .r s· · · · · _ cc,t-1~1 sor.J '$fi.J:t-J:. ~ 1 Ne> <$ c:;£,./<;.MIC. ~ = 414-)CB)(:Z.1) -I-C11)(,z.0J(.10) = ic:6P'-F . . I . i/8 -~.o 'f'SF ",•. ---,- ' I , ' ' ; ~ ~-·~ ---· -, .a. ~1~r-11c:.: ,,~ -~ .·F:... . 183 W6 _ . /83 [ (7;';_~)(,So) ( ~ + z.){z) + //lb f 11.,;; + ??f ] . .:z 8 ps,=· SHEET NO. L 3 OF ______ _ JOB TlnE bAI LY / NPLl$J'F-:lA L JOB N0.-,-4~~-·~'3c,..,..._ --,_-- ENGR."'""""" --'---'"'--· .... -=····a....~-f2~_-'D._.:..______ DATE . -""HOPE E'r,.rGrNEERING -· ··-;· '·-., .. '· •. ·• •. , :· ·--' ... CHECKED BY -DATE -.S·t·-r-,u~c··t u·r'·a"·I ,-·E:..n. g; ry"e·e-; 5-----------'------------ : -_,_ :. - - . " \"I . (e psF) ,, !Bo' 4 _ j tq :-°IS -I() E . I . . $HEH NO. , .L-4 OF .... -·. -.]l .• ~11-11 .. ;-.. '":Ii:···:. . :-·_ ::_ ••.• := :-ir.-11:a.m· . . . . . LY tNt::::>Ll<G'T~ A.l-J0a Tine -~ . . · · . 1 JOB NO. -~s~:-ao 4-14--flp ENGR. __ __;__:Z,-1.p.--=p, ___ ---'-DATE · ·. ·HOPE ENGINEER -.. .:. -..... ~ .. : .... , -. .,..: ·~ l:'1S3.:_:. ---_:_ -____ CHECKED BY DATE S·t-ru·•ctu·r·al ·En·gt·n;eer·s· ------- -.. . ·,·' .-1 •. . .J.CJ'S' -~-. 0 o- w1, of~, w~ :<-a;C'if+z.)t.7/f)t.1':i"e,)C,1&'3) wr;·~· P.r:>of ::. {J'2..psF)Cll81)C,1es) t.l •. . l"-42, •. WT. ·.c=F -~. v-J.A(.u;. WT,¢.:~ . . I :::. {JZ psF)( /g5)(, JB-3) i -, · 1·-:-· ---· (' ? · ~ --~ . ' I WT, ~-~C,. W.A~ -- WT,·-~ ~F :::: ·c,~psF)Ct~t1><.,1B?>) rAFT:ITI~ ~C> :: (~/z)(/9+1)(• 18-S) ... ~E. = 7 ~ jl:. (EjP.lf::::> ® K 77 I -:t/, t UtJ17 SHEA-,Z Al-Cl-JG-q/ I 11s' · ,., --- I . V t./17 e,fi!!.IP ® 7t// //8 , (bt{-t../ #/, I I .SH£AJe A/...o/\JG --- = ., -- ---- 757 FF/, qq·7· PF/, ~_;~B11:1, 1 2.£52-#/, I I 17 -tt:J, SHEET NO. i.. ;; JOB TITLE ~IL.1'.'. IN+?(JSTf.?16-k, JOB.NO. 46:?V ENGR. __ ---'--""-~Z?-. 4--'-· -~P==-------'---DATE . 4.-11 ".".:;1.6. .:HOPI;= 'EN'C311NEERING ------;--~·--=--"-' -'--=·-:-:-'.....: -:::.:.·_::... -----_ __ ·_ CHECKED BY DATE -· ,-S t··r u ct u·r. a.-1. ·E··n,;; n··e er 5 · · -,-------- ·- ~-~1~. ffl61N-c~.) ,, -0- ' ~ --~:.e 0 C ~ -· l _...,.... .......-...-,,,,. ; . ----·-~----"·- ~ loo. 4 1 .fFoM (l ~ l] t 'l . ,_ w~ ½ 11 ~,FtLJ~-r. :r rf-.YJ.J.t:, , w; 1~.:::1 e-~,, e,1\1! lo.d ca ~11 ~.N, 11 l~.d <!1:1, I~ f.N· ® ~ . . , r:;1- J J f.1 J] ] l € l=,4-' l 7c."' t1~ ,--:::· -7~"C ,~.'+ ') ,.... C ·-7£7)t /i:JO-•.J')( /ro,4/2) =--.3Bts.'-~ = _ 'BZ,3~ = . ./.o C 1,1'3){'2.f) ' '2, IN ,', use ~-7s .FAJ-l-,::: (l.~'3)C.Z-f){Z)C,C?e,) ::. '8~ ~ :'~_--d4~·. Jp._LJ ·t-J,1-l--dA~~ ---. · r.41 . --··.· 1,-. r= ,A ~ f-, --c:, -. ----;-,, ~ ·1::, A.~ . . -,---1-~-. ' -J-r-.1 I ' . ., --~--:· . : .:F ::; I IB~ l,Jp ·::: {, /8?,)( ~ )C. J'5c;,){l$} ;:;1 ::: . :Z~7 -,, , _._. :a~-~ A'-l~~f!- -. ---'TT·c-·To ~ t 4'.6.S> · -·· F :: _ . 18$ ·we:, ~ C,78'3)C 71f_)Cls-oJC.r3') ; ·_· 21r;,itl, . OF ·· .... " . JOB NQ._ . ~ St:''3-f? ..... ' DATE 4 ... : I~ :.:::'fS us&. PA 2,t3· AN~~~,-~ I II ® 8-0 0,C., · us& # 4-~£1-s e Z.f" c;>. C.. ' ' -----___ .... -· -, -·-·--+ •. t ,,!_. -?-----; ... :. 1-__ ;_ i---, --... ' ! , ' : ; j •. ,,,,i--...... . ! . -!-·'·--. - · OF.:..'---'--'----'--- JpEi NO.:. )?j-~ ¢:,~O~- ·"S~·2~:0it, . . ,+. , ....... ·,. ·. ,,, . . . ·r.· 1,zs-. )' · ''/5)/-.. · · , : .,:_/~OJ1,.1 .. ~z :I~ . -· . -~ -··-, ~~-"-.--.-Fi . _,_ · .. . i7.~ . .--- _ .. '. -~-:~:tt_[= =~'. -.i. • : :L_ 4.r.. _:~~F. ·. -._·. ; ,_:_ .I,. I_,,.; __ : ___ . :-?"::) r~ . : ·_:; ~ t--(t~tl--:-: __ 1~----,--'----,--+-;· l--;-_...,,,..._..,., -...... -.. ,;.....--.a.--,.-'-,---,--i...'...,-! .. -.,.-. _.,.._: ---'!_._ __ -_-! _ ...... __ -1, -. .;._ -------,----------11---------1 ]'3~~ ·-. -i ----··;··--- ---·-·---- -' -,-__ __;.,.,,_,_, .. l • --•¥"" -•• '_ -:--: ..... -r,_ ~ • ..!.. ' . ' • i (!~J{.ss): 110G +· . . ~"f;) ( !So)(1-i'.>l~l ... _ _, __ • --_.J __ --· .. ~ . i:.;· .·_:_-j::;· :,~=\-~--. ..\ . :"I .ps,H __ ·,' : . --· '. _,._ C. !~){_ €-w) j + PJAt?T 17111if'I '$ Zo_ps.F .. 1 -----• --~-___ )_ •• "&~-~p-J ... ,.... : .. -: ---__ , __ : L -::--.. _. __ ·_ ·-----. /28· F6F ·· ~hx w q8 C ;/&;(tz.8 )x -. o . '20.8''5. II psF ... r . ''"·>· ' ---... -~ - ·.-•• • ••• ' • . .'s-_. ___ (.. ___ _ ,-r --'. :,..-_; __ : __ • ---~-j, ~:. ' 1 , l : f I } ·---~ --. ,-, _____ ---·'---- ' ' I ..,__ ---~ + __ ;. _:. {. . -1 -;-~!- :.. ~-: --, _____ :--~ _}_ -'·-i • ( : ) r -~ -t" ... --f~ ... , -+ 7.....__ ,· ' ---: --, -,--,!,-~- ' ' ------,-~,~-- : : &A/Ji .. l11)(~i,) = ~2. 'o/t ------__ .=:. : __ I~::J:J~.~ --~~-~~-~-1/s - , ... --.,.. -,-- --Jl.i..l . 1-I<!. _-,_-,--,I.> ·- , I --,.,. _E,_ -·----~ -=--- ' , . ---~ __ ,_ • ..., --·--Z -. .,., __ -~ --r-, ' I< Jl ) ' . SH_E_ET No.~l-___ .8 __ ' -; ·· -- ... --:-1-· . ·-·. '. J : OATE . vs& ~+'' oT~T-PL.'-(JJD, l,,j / /0'4 e :rt.,, 13,N • c:,,c,,, Joc:l ail ""3 I/ C),t::. I E.fr-1' ·10~ e tz,.'' O, CI F, N I ] l [] lJ.JJ /oc,1 l 'I t)SEf. 4-_ Hs.,S ( ~ -eA&-H SIC>~ or GIL-~) c.. , ,_ \ ' ' . ~ C :3~)(.Jt?o)/*4 .. -,,,,_·U; . . I 'LI-~ •,. ,·, \ -. . : , , ffj, • i-. , ·'· _, -, i·-'· ,g.S,::Z:. ' ~-. . ·:-· . ~', - llj 1 Ji j j J 11 ./?;. t I "'°1 l ~r, ·1 'I ~1-·. ->.;:. ,;!2-i· ., . C_._S~,----~ '· C1ooJ. _,., lo -.,.: .-~·-,__ . w~ -:1-5 .. :;. . '/ / e-- • -: -/---J...-' ) ' " . j_ -i - ·•· 't . .... ------l-, • ., -~- . '. .. j_'fi.. Ll'l-o.· ' ·--. LflJt:. ~~ .. · . ..,.. I"/·(/)(;)(? ;:; -~~·c;~-~~ F :: (.1e~·wo) • I,. 4'. , ~Z. IN , . vs~ z. -# -S _ f 7 == _· c. ~)C ct tic,s' > :: ·-ar~ 1:,, .. x 8 = ' 1F /7l:!.3 .. . ·.v~E. -_,_ . --,--·t-·,--- ---·r·. HT::~---=- t· .= '1'41~"-~. ,,I --,-· -· --·~.a,.-1, ·' .... ,t:;rJrf __ '-i---' . ' .. It(, q~ :cg-. -:-i,,. - ;~__t<-.:. _:· -k!. C . , a.,.-:,;. t1 :_:::_. __ C ~-:) . -u5) .:: :tt Z."T-.1 .~ k. ~ ' -. ' .1z·, . .r."1·, ._ --= .c ~t~J C ri.'J _ -·-,-l,t:. ]?,Z •. - ----, ;--·t-r ---:-~·:----.. · -, -_-.·:,·.~--?{· _ --~-_;-~--. '1Z4 _::.-7$'? -= . ' 1F ,. ·-, -, . - =* -~Fi: '~ ~i~-,- -- ~~,.,. "=""' ~ L- 'SH1, L-\ 0 P.. s·ooi:?. . . --··' •' ' ' ' ,, o,~-. I ' • \ ~---·-l _ • . . ~!'Ii~. ::: II psF , I . ~-:;:~V.~-~ ~·_:_:; . _,_~_(~_o') ts:z) ( /lp$>/{)/2- . i_ :· ~~ •:'. ·-:~: ··· +t1-oi)lw) C.11 i':>#Jiz. . _ ,:,a,·¥-. -~· \/Mli~ •.. -----11~ -~. -,-.· -::..L --t:: i #Je,r ·: , .. :'-i -; ;· ,·: '. ~. ' • ~·.' ~ •. 1 • , ·, :3·fj'AN iSl,:6.----.A,·,-. ~--; >I--~--1~ >----:_ -· > -', --1 __ _ . \ ., , __ 1 __ __,..t ---· ... ..• ~·: :·t~tfif if'.··.· -~·'_:. ·cv.,;i«_t:t~.:e: 1Q1:. == ~ F6; l < .. -'C _· .: • • 1 . . ~~ps; , . o. IL, ~+' L i '·' i, ;-r, M . ::=. 1 ( ~~"-:X. Zf3.) ·+ I c/<( 1"3. ') .:: I OG"'-1-' -k. ·----· 7-.:,z'-IL ~. _, ' ~ ,-• r ... ~----· , .... , .. ',---·7· . t I -. , •• /4 It: t4ooo (z+ooo JC/.'33 -·~-1 .. '_, d •• _, ___ ,_ --;--1 .. -·· ' ' ' -1·· ·.- ~ .... + ; -----.; -. ··~~ n, .. ::.. c~1~l_12') = -r-.::: /'1 ~-~ -73Z. /a.+ :- o/,'3'2; I-~ ~ ' "-';;;;, O V OF __________ ""-----'~ I : .. -. :--~-~-~;--.. is .;_.~;,...·qS--~-, ---, • ' ' l ' ' ----~ ---., --.-, -----~ ~ :_ +--!--; . . ... . .... :-+ ~,.- . -' --i ~ ·_ --~ ' ' ' I tl/1 :::: Cll.p;F )C I o.) ,;;. I Io . , . #.~ I },t; C,Uo ,,, )(,to8J ; I 2- •I /2.,M· == /.Z.. < I, S: -· t>,-r.n -· . . • I • • · 1-"' -. -·:~-. ('-... --~: --· ·--r·---·~ . ·/-~ +• .··' ·.::.-.tti~~ ~ -----.------'-~-t,-...;.. 1 ' • \ I ; . . .-.... -··-·-,-·. ·-·---. .. -- J l-il, i... 1'3-'Z- z+ - ;.-~~+-:~-:=;~J.]=ti-=:c~~ _ ~ __ , __ _ ·J• _,I•.. ·: .-' • ....,; ! __ :_..~,- ' ·-~-•', -·. __ , --.--,,_ .. ..,.,. -· --;--·~ • ' ' • ' I ! I -···~ -~··--·' <-· ···- ._...., - -·'· ~ ,_ ... ~--:~1)=.i-~: .. ··--· ·'~----.... --·-----·--·-·. -------··-~~- ' . '··'·-'. -, . --· ---.,, 28_ -' ____ ,, : 7,2s .::: ~I ~ H 2 Jt:. pl=IZ-p,4-N/U- {~ ~x..,. "f) -.::; C.'1.~~.)(:Zf-X J-Z-) C • b) , ... ' As -:~·-· /8. g-a. ----------c;.0 ,~ (~X-1,~-S> ·, ,·M -~-: -: ('i; "-V"? a' 1 + ... o. J, .. ·----· ... ,.&-A,~/ .. ,_ -: . . ... ..· ..... ,_ IL ~-i·:.!_~-<~ _J_!~B> . ' . . ------·--·-----· ·-~------· I---~ _ /Z . 14., ... _ :_.::;--. _.73z _ T -.... ... Jt!_· 49· '. -_! ____ , -' --~' .~, ..... '. -~L.,',....--. '.,..,.... . ._ t I ' ,. ' \. ...... .J. ~ JYF. - , ~ - Otk t l 1 :::= ·~ /, '33 IN (_z.+ooo X I' g 3> ._ + • __ !_ _: ... ~r-w.· -~-cooc. . --· t ,',, . --· --- -I HT .:: 1'3 i t -= 7, z~1 ~ IDTH _ /2. -I \ I ' I · v. ~: ::. ( 11 JC'3z>Olj:6F)_ ::· 2S' ~ -'(.'2~ca:::,)l/1'-I)' - o.r. i-1. -= (. Z ~ i£ ){_ ;3j (. I'-/ I(.)(~') 1Z. r1 , 'T .. --- --2-'-f I /Z' ---- , . SHEET NO. __ l--_f 6_ :OF....,..,.-e--=--~~-----, -----• :· -• : f -Jos-~o ... d'lso:'3a -~--: :. ·oATE ---· -~: ., DATE: --, 1./000 ~ ~.1 ,;.,, "I.. ~~Cl,'33.) -· .. A--zED Structural Engineering Con~ult.ants . . 7Z75 Rock Canyon Dr. San Diego, C'-92126 (819) 549-8996 JOb------------------- SHEE.T NO.---------OF ______ _ CALCULATED BY-.-------DATE ______ _ CHECKED ey ________ DATE--'------ SCALE · 1 .. ..f ........ .1... ...... 1... ..... J. I -. L__' I ,_I -J..-1 . -"---'-_.__.i .. J , . J· '··J .___,____,__ . f __ · _.; I \ ... l ., .. ,, ... r J r .·l r a- -. ·~. V· \ i \ I \ I .,1,..., •. 1 oVz. D (IN) ., ·12 13 1/2 15 16 1/2 -. ·1 8 1 9 1/2 2 1 .. 22 1/2 WESTERN LUMBER STOCK SIZES GLU-LAM BEAMS: 2 4 F, ARCH 1 T EC TUR AL AF PEARAiKE, L = 5 0' MA>: H'.UM STANDARO-tAMB~R -~-·· · 3 1/8 X 12 5 1/8 X 1 2 3 1/8 X 13 1/2 5 1 /8· X l 5 · 3 1/8 X 1 5 5 1/8 X 1 6 ·172 c:; ¥' 1/8 X 1 8 5/1/8 X 1 9 1/2 SAWN TIMSER1 . .... 2 X 1, 2 II 2 4 X 1 6 ... 1 2 X 14. /I 1 6 X 1 8 II 1 2 X 16 /( 1 8 X 1 8 II 1 12 X 20 # 1 \_ L' = 40 1 MAXIMUM .-3,4 4,3 20F 22F R!:.ACTlON ( K) MOMENT (K,..FT )' MOMENT CK-FT) RO~ R25~ MO:t M25% Mo~ M25X 3.9 Lf; 8 12.s 1 5. 6 11-~ _\J-,1. 4 • 4-S.4 1 5. 6 i 9. 5 ,1-, i '21,S 4.8 6. 1 1 9 • 1 23.9 7,,/ ?6,3 ~ 5 • 3 6. 7 22.8 28.5 2 5. 1 3 1 • 4 5.8 7. 3 26.9 33,6 29.6 3 7 •. o 6. 3 7. 9 3 1 • 3 3 9. 1 3 4 • 4 43.0 6.8 8 • 5 36.0 45.0 3 9. 6, 49.5 7.3 9. 1 41'.0. 51 • 3 4 5, 1 56.4 6 3/4 X ·15 1/2 6 3/4 X 18 6 3/4 X 19 1/2 6 3/4 X 24 TABLES BASED ON: 6 E = 1. 7 X 10-PS I. . . . . F V = 1 5 5 P S .I • 1..2,o 24F MOMEN,T (K-FT) l N .. MOX M2·s~ -· ,i; : 450 ... _Ji;_'}-, ' I!, 7-... ,23,t:r 641 .zi.9 i&,r 879 27.4 3 4. 2 1 • 170 , 3 2. 3 4 0. 3 -. h 520 ---- 37.6 4 6. 9 1,930 43.2 54. 0 2 t 41 Q 49.2' 61 '~ 6 2.; 97_0 .. ···------···---. --. ··----· ·----·-· ···-· -------·· ·---··-·-·--· .. ---------------·-· ·-----··--------·-..... ----. ---. 24 7. 8 9 .. 7 46.3 57.9 50.9 63.7 55,6 69.5 3,600 \· ; : '" -·1 / 2 8. 2· 1 0 , 3 51 • 9 64.9 5 7. 1 7 1 • 4 62 .·3 77.9 4, 3 2·0 \" .. :' . 8.7 1 O ~ 9 57. ·a 72.3 63.6 79.5 6 9 • 4 · . 8 6. 8 5, 1 ~ O ., I . I . -... - C '•':"• ·;: ., 1 , o 0.9 QI 9· 0. 9, O·. 9 ~ I 0 • 9L 0, 9 L u·, tJ = 0. -9t. 0. Qi: 0. 91 ~- -y. . ... JOB----,--.-------------__;, A.:.zED. Structunii Engineering Consulta,nts 7Z75 Rock canyon Dr. SHEET No ...... ----------oF ______ _.:._ CA.lCUUTEO ey ________ OAT£ ------- -.v .f .'·~ ·j San Diego, CA 92126 (619) 54U996 CHECKED BY---------DATE----'--......a......- SCALE l····l-:1-+---·· 1 ·-· 1 \ ... I _J ... t L-·· ··········· _J .. _ I I__ i____...L-- rr l O 1/1.. ~ C:Nl 2 13 1/2 11 5 I · l 6 1 /2 .l 8 r;.o .£4.s r · -/1 ,-. _-'2 'L---. f~i-i,T I.,/.-' ···--· 24F ..! REACTION (K) MOMENT {K-FT} MOMENT ~K-FT) MOMENT· lK-FT) 1:-1~ RO% R25X MO~ M25¾ Mox M25X Moz M25% ·.CF- 738 1.00 6.4 .. 7 . 1 7.9 8.9 7. 9 9·. 9 8.7 10.9 9.5 ·11.9 20,5 25.6 -3 1 • 3 37,4 -f 3 J·t-/3 . . ' s_ 1. s· .... 4-~ • ~ -·---I 60.6 ,·s2;·9 ... ~-... 1 , 0 5 0 J.;f,,-=} 1.440 56.l 1,920 66.l-" 2,490 ·----- 3,170 0. 9 8 :- ·o. 9H 0. 9 6 ~ o.9St 0. 9 4 !:. 19 1/2 .10.3 12.9 . 4 4 • 1 5 1 • 3 59.0 25.6 32.0 3 9 • 1 4 6, B 5 5. 1 6 4 • 1 73.8 4 l • 2 48.5 56.4 6 4. 9 70. 5· 8 1 • 1 92. 5 1 0 l+ 11 7 6 1 ,5 __7 ~ •. 9 2 1 /2 2G i/2 t: i/2 30 1/2 1/2 36 ' 3 7 l /2 39. 11.l 13.9- 11. 9 12. 7 14. 9-6 7. 2 15.9/~ 75.9 13,5 16,9 14.3 ; 15-, 1 15.9 16,7 ~ rr. s 18. 3 17, 9 - 18. 9 19, 9 2 O. 8- ·21. 8 22.8 19.1 23;8 19.9 24.8 .. 2 0. 7 . 2 5. 8 85.2 94,9 105 1 1 6 1 21· 139 1 5 l 163 176 190 204 84,0 9 4 • 9 107 1 1 9 13 l 145 159 174 189 204 220 .. 238 .. _ 74.0 83.5 93.7 104 1 1 5 127 140 152 166 180 194 209 · 1 3 Q 144 159 175 190 208 225 .243 261 281 . 70,8 88.5. 3,960 ·80.7 9 l . i 102 101 ·-1 1 4 .. -·.' 128 i 14·'.~.) -14.2 ~· ...... ·· 126 ·158 139 ) (i"fi<) '---· . -· ··-·.--... . 1 9 o_. 20s· ... \ ... 226 4 '· 860 5,900 7,080 B, 4 1_0 9,890 ~. lt,500 13,-400 15 ,_300 17.,500 245 20,000 0.940 0.92!: 0,920 0.91li ·o.9oh. 0.898 0.894 o_. a~ 9 d.885 152 166 1 El 1 196 2 1 2 228 -265 __ ·_ 2 8 5 22.soo· 0.001 245 306 2 8 1 4 00 o.974 l4o·i12·· ·21~s I . ·-. 14 2 2 2 • 2 26;8 2 7. 8 ·2 55 273 293 .24 0 257 3 oo--· 2 62 328 350 31,600 o.e10 \3 1 /2 \ 23.0 28,8 ~ 218 234 3 2 1 ·2 8 0 35{,"200 0.867 . .- l -r .. ~ Joa----~-------------- A-zED Structural Engineering Consultants 7Z15 Rock Canyon Or. D Cl N) San Diego, CA 92126 (619) ~9-6996 {,, b SHEEt NO.---------OF------- CALCUlATEO !Y--------OATE ______ _ CHECKED BY------0.-----DATE ______ _:.. SCALE rrtr 1,0, ~ ?S,8 sl. cc ---- 7:J q,J [;l·--~-Gf':. ___ l_ _ 22r-__________ ?4F __ j REAC.TION (K) MO~ENT (K-FTJ. "'IL)nENT !K-FTl t-\l)MENT (K-FT) i~ O % R 2 !.i :, ·MO'-M 2 5 X MO:, __ --·· t-12 5 ¾ __ MO~ M 2 ~ !::=f==·· --==~ ----------_. ____ ·--· -· ---------··--··-~--·- ! 2 . . . I a .A. . 1 a • s , 1. a 3 3 • 1 z , , 1-n . ,_ J 1. q 4-o. ~ J 9 , 2 ------- I • O( i · I I 1 3 1 / 2 9 • 4 .'. 1 1 , 8 ·· 3 3 • 7 4 2 • 1 j :}-' \ 4 {:, , J 4 0 't' Su :s : I 1 , 3 8 0 l . l 5 16 1/2 1 0 1 9 1/ 2 2 I 2 2 1 /2 24 2 5 l /2 27 ·.·' ..,.,. ... 28 1/2 30 31 1/::! 33 ·3 4 I /2 36 3 7 I /2 39 4C-1/2 42 ....... 4 3 1 /2, I 6 1) 2·: \ \· -·-· 10.~ .11. 5 12. 6 13. ·5 14.6 1 5 •. 7 .16 .. 7 l 7. 8 rs·. a 19.9 . 20·. 9 22.d 23.0 24;. 1 "' 2 5. 1 26.2 1 3 • 1 ·14. 4 15. 7 17.0 1 8 • 3 19.6 2 O. 9 2 2. 2 •• Ir·. 2 3 .·s· 2ti:a 26.2 27.5 28.8 3 0. 1 31. 4 32.7 27,2 34.0 28,2 35.3 4 l • 2 49.3 58. I 67.6 77.7 · 88. 5 100· 1 1 2 125 138 152 167 182 198 215 232 250 269 5 1 , 5 6 l • 6 72.6 8 4. 5 r.. 7 • 1 1 1 1 125 140 156 173 190 209 228 248 269 290 313 336 29.3 36.6. ·'288· :·· 360 30.3· 37.9 31'.4 39.2 .308 328 385 4 1 0 32.4 .40.5 i 349.::.436 -~ ~ •. i: . : .;. ,·· ;_ .. : I . ····-.. ;. ·-·-· ··-· --· -· .. I • i I 54. 2 I I I I I I l I 63.9 7 4. 4 85,5 97.4 11 0 123 138 152 67.8 7 9. 9, 93.0 107 122 I 3 S 154 172 190 5 9. l 8 l . l 9 3. 2 106 l:?O ·1 I l JS I ! I SO I 166 I i 1 167 i 1 84 209 ·230 .... I _1 a 3- l 200 218 ·23 7 255 251 273 296 31 9 • i · 2 O 1 I l 219 2 =.8 279 2 1 5 3 .. 4 I :: (lo l I I . 2 9 6 3 7 0 . 1 3.2 2 · -:-3 1 ·7 · · -· · ·3 9 6 ----f ·: 3 4 5 . I : 3 3 9 -:.-: ·i; 2 4 ·=-i 3 6 9 361 284 4 5 1 480 ~-•·-··--·-·-··--···· .3 9 3 4 1 9 6/,9 1,900 73.9 8 7. l 1 0 1 1 1 7 133 150 168 187 208 22~ 251 274 298 323 348 2,530 3, 2-80 4 , 170 5,210 6,410 7,7d0 9,330 . 1 1 , IO O 1~.1 600 2 3, 100 29,700 375 I 33,400 4'b3 l37,400 432··141,700 . 461 1-4-~;300 492 51,300 .523 5 6 i,600 0. ':? S 0. 9 7 o.9t 0,95 0,94 0. 9:. 0. 9 3 Q.92 0. JI, 0. 90i 0.90: o.B9i 0. 8 9 £ o.ss; 0. 8 8 1 0. 8 7 ~- · 0. an. d.87( · · 0. 8 6 7 ~ ·~ fJ ---- A-zED Structural Engineering Consultants · 7Z75 Rock Canyon Dr. San Diego, CA 92126 (619) 5-4U996 II, S .. r Job-------------------- SHEET No, __________ OF _______ CALCULA-TED bY ________ DATE ------- CHECKED BY _________ DATE ______ _ SCALE ,Z.6 ·1 I rsz,cr 41.l .. S3\ . ' /0 !It. \ I 20F • 22F ' 24F r-iOMENT (K~FT·)1 MOMENT (K-FT)i MOMENT (K-FT) I.NERTI A;· j _;1;E AR I \'Cr 'r. ...;___~·----t· ,;.. . ' ;-l O • 9 o· (IN) 12: 12.2 ( K) V25¾ .. _ ...... 13.6 1 5. 3 MO¾ t-125~ . M0/4 t--125¾ I MO¾ . M25¾ INCHES4 .. . .. ··· 1 -... -. . .. . .. .. . 1 • • . . -· . • • .... i -3;0.0 _--. 43,;·:-1·1'2.s···-.. _.4g.1 ·r-4-'l_ 6,;1..'J ! ,2EO Co, 1 ; S7.LI 4 3. 7 54. 7 I• I 1 , 7 90 -CF -0. 9 £: 1 3 1 / 2 f5 13.6 17.0 53.4 66.7 S2-1 j 7 0. 2 f],Ll 87.8 2,460 -0,9: .,-/ ./ :-::i. I i6 1/2 !· i ·3 19 1 / 2 2 l I :: ,12 25 1/2 27 14.9 16.3 1 7 • 6 18, 6 20.3 22, 0 19. o_. 2 3. 7 20.3 25.4 21.7 27.1 -23.l 28.8 :i_. ·<· 1-··-_; a ••• · ,r,.·.: -. .. 30 1/2 24.4 30.5 25.8 32.2 :i1.-1··33.9 i 3~ 1/2 28.5 35.6 l . 33 29.8 37.3 l I -3 'f 1 / 2 3 ll., 2 3 9 • 0 ·, ~--·· 3 2 • 6 40 . 7 63.8 7 5. 3· 97 ·, 6 101 l l 5 130 145 152 179 196 ! 217 j 237 ·1 257 I I 219 J 7 \~ / 2 ; 3 3 • 9 4 2 • 4 ! 3 0 l . ---· 'l ..... •. . '· .. ~ . :·:· .:, . .:·· . ( .. I ~ i ' 9 35.3 44.1 j·324 (I l /,2 3 6 . 6 4 5 , 8 1 · I -348_ I 2 .. . . ... ... 3 8 Q0 I, . i • • _":t 7;. ·5 · · · I 3 7 3 ----·-. ·,;-;.·-- 4 3 1 / 2· :f 9. 3 I I ! 3 99 79:8 9 4 • 1 11 0 125 143 162" 182 202 224 247 271 296 321 348 376 405 436 466 498 ' I I ' j 82, A I 96.4 1 1 1 126 143 160 i 178 I i-: 197 j ! ! 217 I ' I I 238 260 ! 283 i 307 331 357 383 : . t; 1 0 .i ! 4 39 I -· , 1 04 120 139 158 178 200 223 246 -27 2 298 325 354 383 414 44 6 479 76.6 90.3 1"05 1 2 1 138 156 !_;_--·-- ' 174 95.8 1 1 3 1 3 1 1 5 1 172 194 218 194 243 215 2(9 237 /29·6··· 284 30~ 335 361 389 4 1 B __ , ~25 355 386 4 1 8 452 486 3,280 4,250 5 ,· 4 1 0 6, 7 '.iO B,310 10,100 12,100 1l,I400 19,700 .,·22, BOO 26,200 :34,000 36,500 43,300 4 8 I 4 00 · · ·513 ·-·-·:· 449 I 522 ---·-560 5,.; 000 . 5~8 1478 :598 60,000 ,· . -_ . ll 0-.3/1,-,:. 0. 9 f 0. _9_~ 0 9' • I Q • 9 L 0.9: o. ,,,I( 0. 8<: a.a~ G, 8 E O.BE O. 8 E ' 0 •. B 7 0.87 O.Si o.86 - ,JI' ~~. ·, ~ ' . ' . . A-zED Structural Engineering Consultants , I NAL SIZE 2 X 4 ,., '/ 6 ·\.t 2 X 8 2' X 1 o" 2 X 12 2 X 14 2 X 16 4 X 4 4 X 6 4 X 8 4 X 10 _, 12 -- 4 X 14 4 X 15 ..... tJ~-6 6 X 8 fr·x 10- 6 .. X 12 6 X 14 6 X 16 6 X 18 5 X 20 8 X 8 ., 8 X 10 . . -- J 12 ·- i ·x 14 .. 3 X 16 7Z75 Rock Canyon Dr. . -' San Diego, CA 82126 (618) 549-6996 REACTION MOMENT #2 LBS. FT. LBS. 335 420 370 460 525 660 799 990 690 860 · 1,360 1,700 880 1, 10 0 2,230 2,790 1,070 1,~40 3,290 4, 119 -.. 1,260 1, 5 8 O 4,570 5,719 1, 4 5 O 1, s'l 0 .6,050 _7,560 780 980 860 1, O 8 0 1,220 1,530 1,830 2,290 1,610 ·2,010· 3,200 4,000· 2,050 2,560 5,200 6,500 . ·•· ~.-·-. .. 2,490 3, 11 O 7,690 9;1 61 O . ,. ... 2,940 3,680 10,7'00 13,400 3 J) 8_0 4,230 1~,100 17 , .. 6 O 0 1,720 2,150 2.,340 2,930 2,960 3,700 _3,590 4,490 4 ,· 2 i 0 5, '2 6 0 4,830 6,040 5,450 6,810 6,080 7, 6 o·o 3, 19 O 3,980 4,040 5,050 4,890 6, 1 i 0 5,740 7,170' 6,590 8,230 ... JOS-'-·---,-----:-·------------- SHEETNO.---------OF ______ _ CALCULATED av _______ DATE _____ _ CHECKED BY~---------DATE------ -,J ---·- MOMENT # 1 MOMENT s. s. INERTIA FT. LBS. FT. LBS. INCHES 450 560 540 680 5. 4 950 1, 190 1,140 1,430 20. 8 .. 1,640 2,050 1, 9 7 O 2,460 47.6 -. . .. ··-... . .. 2,680 3,350 3,210 4, 0 1 O· 98.9 3,950 4,940 4,740 5,930 178 5,490 6,860 6,590 8,240 291 7,260 9;080 8,720 10,900 443 1,040 1,300 1,240 1,550 1 2 . 5 ---~ 2)200 2,750 2,640 3,300 48.5 3,840 4,800 4,610 5,760 111 6,240 7,800 7,490 9,360 2 31 9,230 11,500 11,100 13., 8 O·O 415 .. 12, 8 0 0 .. 16;000 15,400 19,200 678 17,000 21., 2 0 0 .. 20,400 25.500 1030 2,770 3,460 3,400 4,330 7 6 . .3 5 I l fr0 6,450 6,450 8,060 193 8;960 ,11,200 11,000 13;790 393 13,130 16, 41Q ___ 16,160 20,200 697 17,790 22,230 21,900 27,370 1130 23,100 28)880 28,440 35,550 1710 29,070 36,340 35,780 44,720 2460 35,670 44,590 4 3-, 91 O 54,890 3400 7,910 9,890 9,380 11,700 263 12,700 15,900 15,000 18,800 536 " .. .. 18,600 23,300 22,000 27,600 951 25,600 32,000 '30,400 38,000 1540 33,800 42,200 40,000 50,100 2330 :; CoNSTRUGTION TEsTING & ENGINEERING, INC. ESCONDIDO • MODESTO • CORONA • OXNARD • RENO • ·sEATTLE 2414 VINEY ARD. Ste G 3540 OAKDALE 13,ll Ste A2 490 E. PRINCELAND CT #7 1645 PACiflC A VE. #105 32 GLEN CARRAN CR. 30'J S. CLOVERDALE-D30 ESCONDIDO, CA 92029 MODESTO, CA r5355 CORQNA, CA 91719 OXNARD, CA 93033 SPARKS, NV 89431 SEATILE, WA 98108 (619) 74Cr4955 (20'.l)· 551-2271 . ,(90'J) 3.71-1890 (805) 486-6475. (702) 331-0503 (206) 767-1820 FAX (619) 746-9806 FAX (209) 551-3593 FAX ,(9()1)) 371-2168 FAX (805) 486-9016 FAX (702) 331-2667 FAX (206) 762-8751 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS _PROPOSED COMMERGIAL DEVELOPMENT LOT 38, .AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTRE~ UNIT 2 . CARLSBAJ), CALIFORNIA PREPARED FOR: DAILY INDUSTRIAL 2270 CAMINO VIDA RO;BLE, SUITE H CARLSBAD, 'CA 92009 . PREPARED BY: CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. 2414 VINEYARD AVENUE, SUITE G ESCONDIDO, CA 92029 ,-__,; v C'TE JOB NO. 101018 March 9, 1995 GEOTECHNICAL AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING TESTING AND INSPECTION ' '( CoNSTRUCTION ThsTING & ENGINEERING, INC. ESCONDIDO • MODESTO . • CORONA • OXNARD • RENO • SEATTLE 24.14 VINEY ARD. Ste G 3540 OAKDALE~ Ste A2 490 E. PRINCELAND CT #7 ·1645 PA,CIFIC AVE. #105 32 GLEN CARRAN CR. 30'J S. CLOVERDALE-D30 ESCONDIDO,CA92029 MODESTO,CAq5355 CORONA,CA91719 OXNARD,CA93033 SPARKS,NV89431 SEATILE. WA98108 ENGINEERING, INC. (619) 746-4955 (20'J) 551-2271 (90'J) 371-1890 (805) 486-6475 (702) 331-0503 (206) 767-1820 _FAX (619) 746-9806 FAX (209) 551-3593 FAX (90!)) 371-2168 FAX (805) 486-9016 FAX (702) 331-2667 FAX (206) 762-8751 March 9, 1995 Daily Industrial 2270 Camino Vida Roble, Suite I:I Carlsbad; CA 92009 Sµbject: References: Gentlemen: Geotecbnical Evaluation and Recon,unendations Proposed Commercial Dev~lopment . Lot 38, Airport Business centre, Unit z Carlsbacl, California · Geotecbnical Report of Rough Grading Airport Business Centre, Unit 2 Carlsbad, California Prepared by ICG Incorporated Dated April 21, 1993 CTE Job No. 101018 . As per your request, we have ,preformed a geotecbnical evaluation of the subject site in order to provide geotecbnical recommendations for-the proposed site development. The purpose of our report was to evaluate previously documented earthwork activity which occurred within the influence area of the site as part of rough grading activities for the Airport Business Center, Unit 2. Our recommendations are based on site reconnaissance, limited site exploration, reference review, and proposed site usage. The opportunity to be of service is appreciated. If you have any questions regarding our recommendations, pl~ase do :p.ot hesitate to contact this office. Respectfully submitted, vZ;~ ·Rodney D. Ballard, GE #2173 Geotecbnical Engineer RDB:1m cc: File/Copy/101018.REP GEOTECHNICAL AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING TESTING AND INSPECTION (Job No. 101018) TABLE OF CONTENTS ' ' SECTION 'PAGE · l.O 2.0 3-.0 4:.-0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 -9.0 Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 · Scope of Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S. D .. 1te escnpt1on . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . Proposed· Development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . Site Investigation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . As-Graded Conq.itions . . . . . . . . ; . . . . . . . . . . . . . Geologic Hazards ........................ . Conclusions and Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Existing Slopes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foundation Recommendations . . ; . . . . . . . . . . . . . Recommended Pavement Sections . . : . · . . . . . . ·. . . . Subgrade Subbase and Aggregate Base . . . . . . . . . . . Retaining W~ls ..... · ..... · ............. _. .. Additional Construction Observation . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2 2 3 3 4 8 11 12 15 16 16 18 . 10.0 11'.0 J2.0 13.0 14 .. 0 15.Q Limitations .... , ... · ............ ,. . . . . . 18 APPENDIX A: REFERENCES' APPENDIX B: FJELD INVESTIGATION APPENDIX C: REFERENCE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT ~ .;, Geotechnical Evaluation and Recommendations Proposed Commercial Development Lot 38, Airport Business Centre, Unit 2 March 9, 1995 1.0 BACKGROUND Page 1 CTE Job No. 101018 The site consists of a mass graded lot on Kellogg Avenue wiWn the Airport Bµsfuess Centre, Unit 2 in Carlsbad, California. Based on reference review, rough grading of the business park ~ was generally performed during the period or September, 1989 thr0ugh April, 1990. As-graded ' ' ' d!lta indicates that all fill areas were compacted td at· least 90 % of laboratory maximum density. The report also indicates that low to moderately expansive soils are present at finish grade . throughout the graded areas. 2.0 SCOPE OF .SERVICES The scope _of services provided fot in this investigation includec;l: 2 .1 Subsurface exploration including excavation _and field logging of two shallow exploratory borings; 2.2 Geologic and soils engineering analysis of field data, wbich provide the basis for our conclusions and recommendations; 2.3 Review of readily available geotechnical and geologic reports pertinent to the project site . . Reports reviewed are as follows: • Geotechnical Report of Rough Grading, Airport Business Center, Unit 2, Carlsbad, California, prepared by ICG Incorporated, dated April 21, 1993 (Appendix D). Geotechpical Evaluation and Re.commendations Proposed Comtnercial Development Lot 38, Airport Business Centre, Unit 2 .March 9,. 1995 Page 2 CTE Job No. 101018 2.4 Review of readily available topographic plans regarding previous site grading operations. Plans reviewed are as follows: • Grading Plans for C.T. 81-46, Unit No. 2, Airport Business Center, Carlsbad, California, prepared by Rick Engineering Company, dated July 25, 1990. 2.5 Preparation of this report presenting our findings, conclusions, and recommendations :pertaining to the soil engineering aspects of the proposed site developments. 3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION Topographica.Ily, the site is flatly graded with approximately 2: 1 (horizontal:vertical) slopes along the-north, south, west and e~st bounqaries of the site area. An approximate 20 foot high . ascending s!ope is situated along the north boundary. The descending and ascending slopes along the west and east boundaries,. respectively, are approximately 15 feet high. The descending slope which extends across the south portion of the site tapers from a height of 2 feet at the east drive area to approximately 15 feet at the west boundary. 4.0 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Based on conceptual site layout inf ormati9n, proposed development is to consist of the construction a single-story or two-story commercial/industrial concrete tilt-up structure with associated parking/drive area and utilities. Geotechnk:al Evaluation and Recommendations Proposed Commercial Development Lot 38, Airport Business Centre, Unit 2 March 9, 1995 5'.0 SITE INVESTIGATION Page 3 CTE Job No. 101018 Tp:e .site investigation was ~onducted· ·OY a Construction Testing. & Engineering, Inc. staff engineer on December 16, 1994. The investigation consisted 0f a surficial reconnaissance and limited subsurface exploration. The subsurface exploration was performed with a hand-operated, General 440 :auger powerhead, using a four inch diameter continuous flight auger. A total of two exploratory borings were drilled. The borings· were excavated to evaluate the shallow subsurface geology. Boring logs Figures Bl through B2 in Appendix B contain geologic descriptions of materials logged by our personnel. Figure 2 .of Appendix A, depicts the approximate boring locations . .. 6.0 AS-GRADED CONDITIONS As indicated in the refe:renced report, mass grading was performed using conventional techniques to. produce the level building pad. Mass ~rading was generally conducted from the period of September~ 1989 through April, 1990. f Geotechnical Evaluation and Recommendations. · Proposed Commercial Development Lot 38, Airport Business Centre, Unit 2 M~ch 9, 1995 Page 4 CTE Job No. 101018 Review of the reference rough gta,ding plan indicates that the relatively level building pad was generally created by cut excavation into native formationar materials. A small area of the '' " '' · southwest portion of the subject lot is· overlain by shallow fill materials (Figure 2). Based on bjstorical topographic data the southwest portion of the site is believed to be overlain by up to 5 feet of fill. As..,graded reporting indicates tl).at fill materials were compacted to-90 % relative compaction. 7.0 GEOLOGIC HAZARDS 7 .1 • Faulting and Seismicity Based on site reconnaissance, information form our exploratory borings, and a review of pertinent geologic literatµre, it is our opinion that tne _site-is not located on any active fault traces. The Rose Canyon Fault, located approximately 7.5 miles west of the site is the closest active · fault. An active fault is defined by the California Division of Mines and Geology (CDMG) as a fault with evidence of activity during the Holocene (a,pproximately the last 11,000 years). Other nearby active faults are the San Clemente Fault Zone (approximately 55 miles to the southwest); the Elsinore and Saµ, Jacinto FatJlts (approximately 22 and 45 miles to the Iiortheast); artd the San Apdreas Fault (appro:ximately 65 miles to the east-northeast). Geotechnical Evaluation and Recommendations Proposed Commercial Developme:qt Lot 38, Airport Business Centre, Uhit 2 · March 9, 1995 Page 5 CTE Job No. 101018 The Table below is a summary .of the principal regional faults considered most likely to rupture and possibly induce strong ground shaking at the site during the useful life of the proposed ·c9nstruction. Included in the Table is a summary of each fault's seismic characteristics. FAUI:.T ZONE. Rose Canyon ,. · San Jacinto · San Andreas San Clemente Elsm0re :ESTIMATED . DISTANCE AND DIRECTION FROM SITE (miles) 7.5W 45 NE 65 NE 55 SW 22NE ESTIMATED PEAK BEDROCK PROBABLE ACCELERATION EARTHQUAKE (in G-forces)(2) MAGNITUDE (1) 7.0 0.43 7.5 0.12 8.3 0.09 6.7 0'.05 7.5 0.27 1. Seismic Safety Study, City of San Diego (1974) & Bonilla (1970) 2. Seed an<;! Idriss (1982) 3. Plb~ssel and Slosson (1974) REPEATABLE IDGH GROUND ACCELERATION (in G-forces)(3) 0.28 0.12 0.09 0.05 0.27 We have analyzed the possible bedrock accelerations at the site. For the intended use, it is our opinion that the most significant seismic event would be a 7. 0 moment magnitude earthquake on the Rose Canyon Fault Zone. This event could produce estimated peak bedrock accelerations of 0.43.g and repeatable high ground accelerations of 0.28g. ~ ~ .. ~ f. · Geotechnical Evaluation and Recommendations Proposed Commercial Deveiopment Lot 38, Airport Business Centre1 Unit 2 March 9, 1995 7 .2 Liquefaction Evaluation Page 6 CTE Job No. 101018 Liquefaction occurs when saturate4 fine-grained sands or silts lose their physical strengths during earthquake induced shaking and behave as· a liquid.. This is due to loss of point-to-point grain contact and transfer of normal stress to the pore water. Liquefaction potential is a function of water level, soil type, material gradation, relative density, and probable intensity and duration of ground shaking. Because of the dense nature of onsite materials and the estimated depth to groundwater the potential fot liquefaction at the site should be considered low. 7. 3 Seismic Settlement. Evaluation Seismic settlement occurs when loose to m,edium. dense granular soils densify during seismic events. The native Scripps Formation materials were found to be dense to very dense and are not considered likely to experience significant seismic settlement. Therefore the potential for seismic settlement resulting in structural damage should be considered low. Geotechnical Evaluatiop and Recommendations Proposed Cb~ercial Development Lot 38; Airport Business Centre, Unit 2 March 9, 1995 7.4. Tsunamis and Seiche Evaluation. Page 7 CTE Job No. 101018 The site is located approximately 4 miles east of the Pacific Ocean at an elevation of approxunately 290 feet and is therefore most likely not subject to tsunami related damage. No significant bodies of water are located bl the immediate site vicinity which could induce seiche .damage. · · 7. 5 Landsliding · .Potential site specific lapdsliding haz~rds were·mittgated during .the mass grading operations. Landsliding is therefore not consi.dered a significant hazard within or immediately adjacent to the pt9posed· building area. · 7 .. 6 Compressible Soils Bas~d on geo10gic observation and laboratory testing, Scripps Formation materials exhibit low · compressibility characteristics and are considere4 suitable for structure support. 7. 7 . Expansive . Sbils Soils encountered during the subsurface investigation were generally found to consist of silty and clayey sand exhibiting moderate expansion potential. Recommendations for earthwork and foundation construction are presented in Sections .8.0 and 10.0 of this report. ( J Geotechnical Evaluation and Recommendations Proposed Commercial Development Lot 38, Airport Business Centre, Unit 2 March 9,. 1995 ' ' ' Page 8 CTE Job No. 101018 8.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on our geotechnical investiga,tion, it is our opinion that the proposed development is feasible· from a geotecm,tlcal standpoint provided the following recommendations are incorporated int<:l the design and construction of· the subject preject. The following sections discuss the principal ~eotechnical concerns affecting proposed development, grading, and foundation design recommendations whiqh should be implemented during site construction. 8.1 -Site Preparation Prior to grading, the ~ite should be cleared of loose soil, debris, and vegetation. Vegetation and depris should be disposed of off site .. 9.2 Compacted Fills Areas to receive fiJ,I and/ or other surface improvements should be scarified to a depth of approximately 12 inches, brought to near optimum moisture content, and recompacted to at least 90· percent relative compaction (based on ASTM D1557). ' ' ·pm ,placement should be performed in lifts, ,of uniform depth. The optimum lift thickness to ' ' ' produce a uniformly compacted fill will depend on the type and size of compaction equipment usec:I. In general, , fill should be placed jn uniform. compacted lifts not exceeding 8 inches in thickness. Fill soils should be placed at a minimum of 90 percent relative compaction (based l~ ::, J J Geotechnical Evaluation and Recommendations Proposed Commercial Development Lot 38, Airport Business Centre, Unit 4 . March 9, 1995 Page 9 CTE Job No. 101018 on ASTM D1557) near optimum moisture C(?rttent. Placement and compaction of fill should be . performed in accordance with local grading ordinanc.es under the observation and testing of the geotechnical cons1.dqmt. Fill soils (imported and on-site) should be granular with 100 percent of the material less than 6 inches in maximum dimension. Fill soils placed within 3 feet of finish grade should have an expansion index less than or equal to 60 (per UBC 29-2). 8.3 Treatment of Transition Conditions Based on our understanding of the proposed site development, we do not anticipate the proposed building will not span a significant cut/fill transition. In the case that a _shallow .transition is ereated during fine grading operations, all footm~s should be embedded entirely in competent formational materials or entirely in compacted fill. Where foundations are embedded entirely fu. compacted fill, the building pad area should be overexcavated, where .required, to provide a uniform depth of fill throughout the foundational soils. 8.4 Trench Excavation and Backfill The on-site soils may generally be suitable as trench backfill provided they are screened of material over 6 inches in diameter and organic matter. Tr~nch backfill should be compacted in uniform lifts (not exceeding 8 inches ii1 compacted thickness) by mechanical means to at least 90 percent relative compaction (ASTM D1557). Geot~cbnical Evaluation and Recommendatiov.s Proposed Comm.ercial Development Lot 38, Airport Business Centre, Unit 2 March 9, 1995 Page 10 CTE Job No. 101018 Outcroppings of Santiago Peak Meta-Volcanic rock were observed to be surficially exposed in the existing north and east slopes. Rock outcroppings wete observed to be highly fractured and, as such should be rippable with moderate effort for anticipated shallow excavations. Localized uilfractqred rock., requiring heavy ripping, mqy ·b~ encountered at .shallow depth. 8.5 Temporacy Construction Slopes Provided below are sloping recommendations for unshored temporary excavations. The recommended slopes should be relatively stable against deep seated failure,-but may experience localized sloughing. The recommended .slopes are based on the assumption that excavation side walls will be comprised of moderately cemented silty sandstone or previously disturbed cohesive soils. Moderately cemented silty sandstone and previously disturbed cohesive soil are considered to be type 11B II as defined by Cal-OSHA. Sloping of type 11B II soils are set forth in the following table. RECOMMENDED SLOPE RATIOS' B 1:1 (MAX.) 20 FT Geotechnical Evaluation and ;R.ecomrhendations Proposed Co.mmercial Development Lot 38, Airport Business Centre, Unit 2 March 9, 1995 Page 11 CTE Job No. 101018 Actual field conditions and soil type designations· must be verified by a "competent person" while excavations exist in accordance wi~ Cal~OSHA regulations. Also, the above sloping recommepdations do pot allow for · surcharge loading at the top of slopes by equipment or materials. Appropriate surcharge setback must he maintained from the top of all unshared slopes. 9.0 EXISTING SLOPES Existing site slopes were examined and evaluated based on observed soil conditions and grading methods described in the as-built report. Presently, existing site slopes consist of approximately 2 to 1 (horizontal to vertical) cut slopes along the north, south and west boundaries (Figure 2). We recommend that all permanent slopes, cut and fill, be graded at a maximum slope of 2:1. Evaluation using the Janbu method ~ ·conservative estimated soil parameters of </> = 30° and C = 150 psf indicate a factor of safety in excess of 1.5 for the existing slopes. ' ' ' Although graded and existing slopes on this site should be grossly stable, the soils will be somewhat ,erodible. Therefore, runoff water should· not be permitted to drain over the edges of slopes: unless that water is confined to properly d~signed and constructed drainage facilities. · Additionally, slopes should be planted and :maintajned with erosion resistant vegetation. ( Geotechni:cal Evaluation and Recommendations Proposed Comm.ercial Development , l.ot 38, Airport Business Centre, Unit 2 March 9, 1995 10.0 FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS 10 .1 General Page 12 CTE Job No. 101018 The following recommendations are for preliminary planning purposes only. Additional fine grading as recomm~nded herein . is anticipated prior to s,ite development. Foundation recommendations should be reviewed after completion 0f earthwork and review of laboratory testing of near surface soils when grading is complete. Specific structural inform3:tion was not available at the time of this report. However, based on our experience, it is anticipated that structural loads will be on the order of 125 kips maximum loads for columns and 5.0 kips.pet lineal foot for walls. In the event the above assumptions are not corre<;;t, the conclusions and recommendations contained in this report shall not be considered Vc\lid unless reviewed and modified. 10.2 Foundations -Spread Footings The recommended design parameters are for spread footings bearing on formational material. Preliminary design parameters are outlined in the following chart: Geotechnical Evaluation and Recommendations Proposed Commercial Development LQt 38, Airport Business Centre, Unit 2 March 9, 1995 Page 13 CTE Job No. 101018 ---=== Continuous 18 3000 0.35 300 5,500 Isolated 18 3000 0.35 · 300 5,~00 The niinimum width recommended for all footmgs is.18 jnches. All continuous footings should be reinforced with a minimum of two No. 4 reinforcing. bars, top and bottom. All footing depths should be measured from the l0west adjacent ground surface or pad grade, whichever is lowest. The bearing values. indicated above -~e for the ·total of dead plus live_ loads and may be increased by a maximum of one third for short duration loading which includes the effects of wind or seismic forces. When combining passive pressure and friction for lateral resistance, the passive component should be reduced by one third. 10.3 . Foundation Settlement The ·potential for foundation settlement should be analyzed once foundation loads are known. IIi gep.eral, for the previously stated column ~nd wall loads the maximum settlement is expected to be ·less than 1/4 inch in 25 feet. Geotechnical Evaluation a1;1d Recommendations Proposed Commercial Development Lot 38, Airport Business Centre, Unit 2 March 9, 1995 10.4 Concrete Slab-On-Grade Page 14 CTE Job No. 101018 Concrete slabs-on,-grade should be at least 4 incl;les thick for iight industrial loads. As a minimum, concrete slabs should be reinforced with No. 3 reinforcing bars on 18 inch centers. AU slab·reinforcement should be properly supported to ensure placement near mid-height of the c<?ncrete. All slab areas should be underlain· by a minimum of two inches of clean sand (Sand Equivalent > 30). Special design consideration should be given to the type of business, and the building intended use, Heavy machinery or vehicular loads may require thicker slab and increased reinforcement. In moisture ·se1;1Sitive floor areas, slabs should be underlain by a vapor barrie~ consisting of a m4rimum of .six mil polyethylene sheeting or equivalent membrane with all laps sealed. This membrane should be placed over an inch of clean sand and covered with a minimum of one inch of sand to protect the sheeting during concrete placement operations. 10.5 Foundation Setback Based on the pr~posed building orientation, jt is our understanding that the building's foundation will not be constructed witW.n 10 feet of any downward trending slopes. Footings for buildings should be· designed such that the minimum horizontal distance from the top of adjacent slope to the outer edge of the footing is one-half of the slope·height to a maximum value of 15 feet. Geotechnical Evaluation and Recommendations Proposed Commercial Development Lot 38, Airport Business Centre, Unit 2 March 9, 1995 Page 15 CTE Job No. 101018 11.0 RECOMMENDED PAVEMENT SECTIONS Preli.mipary pavement sections presented below are based on representative area "R" Value data. The pavement design is based on California Department ,of Transportation Highway Manual and on ,traffic indexes as in4icated below: . Truck Drive/ Loading. Areas Auto Parkin~ Areas 6.0 4..5 15 15 3.5 11 2.5 8 Upon completion of finish grading, "R" Value sampling and testing of subgrade soils should be conducted and pavement section modified if necessary. ' deotechnical Evaluation and Recommendations · Proposed Commercial Development Lot 38, Airport Business Centre, Unit 2 March 9, 1995 Page 16 CTE Job No. 101018 12.0 SUBGRADE SUBBASE.AND AGGREGATE BASE All aggregate base materials and subgrade materials where asphalt is to be placed on grade should be compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 95 percent of the laboratory standard. The upper 12 inches of subgrade beneath pavement areas should also be compacted to 95 percent relative compaction at 1 to 3 percent above optimum moisture content. 13.0 RETAINING WALLS Should. retaining walls be constructed at the site1 the following guidelines shall be employed. . . . Retaining walls that are unrestrained (free to inov~ ~t the· top), should be designed using the active earth pressure. For restrained walls (the top braced to prevent movement) the at-rest earth pressure should be used. These pressures can be taken as the equivalent fluid pressures, in pounds per cubic foot, given below: · · Backfill Type and Condition Active At-Rest Native Soil, Level Backfill 70 pcf 90 pcf · N~tive Soil, 2: 1 Backfill 90 pcf 120 pcf (i:ranular .Soil, Level Backfill 35 pcf · 60 pcf Granular Soil, '2: 1 Backfill 55 pcf 95 pcf Geotechnical Evaluation and Recommendatio~ Proposed Commercial Development Lot 38, Airport Business Centre, Unit 2 March 9, 1995 Page 17 CTE Job No. 101018 These pressures depend on the assumption that the soil behind the wall is compacted to 90 % of maximum dry density at the optimum m,oisture content. They also require that no free groundwater be present and that significant surcharge loads not exist within a zone defined by a one-to-one plane projected back from the base of the wall. In all cases, adequate drains should be placed behind the Walls to relieve hydrostatic pressure$. Walls subject to loads sho1,1ld be designed for the equivalent fluid pressures above, plus an additional uniformly distributed J?ress:ure caused by the load. Clays with .an Expansion Index of 60 or more should not be u,sed as-backfill. Project plans should clearly state that use of gr~ular -backfiJl is required where that option has .been selected. We should be contacted for specific re~ommendations if retaining walls on this site do not conform to the assumptions stated above. In addition, we recommend that only light, hand-operated equipment be used to compact backfill behind walls. The backfill should not be over-compacted, as excessive compaction loads will increase· earth pressures above the values given above. 13 .1 Lateral Resistance To provide resistance for design lateral loads, we recommend using an equivalent passive fluid weight of 300 pcf for footings or grade beams pouted neat against properly compacted, select Geotechnical Evaluation and RecollJille!ldations Proposed CollJillercial Development Lot 38, Airport Business. Centre, Unit 2 .· March 9, 19~5 Page 18 CTE Job No. 101018 fill soils. This yalue a&suines a horizontal surface for the soil mass extending.at least 10 feet or three times the height of the surface generating passive pressure, whichever is greater. 14.0 ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION All additional grading should be observed and tested to assure conformance with recommendations presented herein. All footing trenches a,ud foundation reinforcement should be examined prior to concrete placement. It is recommended that the soil engineer review final design drawings to ensure compliance with recommendations provided herein. 15.0 LIMITATIONS 01,lr recommendations are based on the limited site_ investigation, available report review, and preliminary conceptual design inf0illlation. The reco:rwnendations made herein are based on the assumption that soil' conditions do not deviate appreciably from those found during our field investig;ition. Professional jqdgemenis presented herein are based partly on our understanding of the proposed construction, and p~r:tly on our general experience. Our engineering work and judgements rendered meet current professional stan,dards; we do not guarantee the performance of the project in any respect. .l Geotech,ilical Evaluation and Recommendations Proposed Commercial Development Lot 38, Airport Business Centre, Unit 2 March 9, 1995 . ' Page 19 CTE Job No. 101018 The opportunjty to be of· service is appreciated. . If you have any questions regarding testing conducted, observations made during construction ·or recommendations presented herein, please do not hesitate to contact this office. ·. Respectfully submitted, CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. ;Ju. ?B-cA-/ Rodney D. Ballard, GE #2173 Geotecpnical Engineering Manager \+j 1-~ Ja/j. Lynch, CEG #1890 .Senior Engineering Geologist RDB:sc:lm cc: File/Copy/101018.REP -----~l,.Jd,U-0 Project -Engmeer ~ '·-·~ CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. t ----.... _.; N l -----·-- 21. SOU.RCE: . THOMAS BROS. MAPS 1994 SAN DIEGO EDITION I I I I I P>.U ·\ ,··-· .. ;;-- \ ., ,-,-"' 't ' I '~· SITE LOCATION MAP PROPOSED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT LOT 38, AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER, UNIT 2 CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA JOB NUMBER: t0-1018 DATE: 3/95 FIGURE: 1 ·'· ·1 C ONSTR~CTION TES TING & ENGINEERING, INC. t N J r--r-------y-~----1 rs-~~-~--~ ! 81 NG D9CK I I I I : PROPOSED I I I I BUILDING I I H T" rl I I 1 : s2 --I j · I 1 '-paoPOseo RARKING I r : I JJQ., ~ \J'--=----,· '·---• \~~ KELLOGG AVENUE LEGEND -$- r \ ---. (t,' T .. APPROXIMATE BORING LOCATION CUT/FILL TRANSITION QUATERNARY ARTIFICIAL TERTIARY SCRIPPS FORMATION FILL NOTTO SCALE BORING LOCATION. & SITE PLAN PROPOSED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT LOT 38, AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER, UNIT 2 CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA JOB NUMBER: 101018 DATE: 3/95 FIGURE: 2 l ; l j dob No. 101018) APPENDIX A REFERENCES 1. Bowles, J.E., 1982, "Foundation Analysis and Design," McGraw Hill. 2. California Division of Mines and Ge0logy, 1975. "Character and Recency of Faulting, San Diego Metropolitan Area, California", Special Report 123 3. California Division of Mines and Geology, 1992-Revised. "Fault-Rupture Hazard Zones in California," Special Publication 42. 4. Coduto~ D.P., 1994,. "Foundation Design", Prentice Hall. 5. Das,. B.M.,. 1983, "Advanced Soil Mechanics", Hemisphere J>t,iblishing Corpora,tion. 6. Department of the Navy, 1982, •isoil Mechanics Design Manual", Naval Facilities Engineering Command. 7. Gastil, G. Higley, R., 1977. "Guide to Sa11. Diego Area Stratigraphy, "The Edwin C. Allison Center, San Diego State Univer$ity. 8. Greensfelder, R.W., 1974. "Maximum Credible Rock Acceleration from Earthqual(es in California, "Map Sheet 23. 9. Hart, E.W., 1992, "Fault-Rupture Hazard Zones in California", Califoi;nia Departn:J.ent of Conservafion. IO. Holtz, R.D., 1981, "An Introducti0n to Ge0technical EJ:?.gineering", Prentice Hall. 11. Kennedy, M.P., 1975. "Geology of the San Diego Metropolirap Area, California, "California Divisi0n of Mines and Geology, Bulletin 200. 12. Peck, R.B., 1974, "Foundation Engineering", John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 13-. Sari Diego Associatiqn of Geologists on the Manner of Deposition of Eocene Strata ~ Northern San Diego County, April 13,. 1985. APPENDIXB FIELD INVESTIGATION . ( CoNsTRucrION TESTING & ENGINEERING, me . DEFINITION OF TERMS PRIMARY DMSIQNS SECONDARY DIVISIONS GRAIN SIZES . . -·sotJLD'ERS COWLES ___ G __ R;...aA"""' V ___ E __ L __ . _______ ...-s_A_N_D.....,...--,-----1 SIL TS AND CLAYS COARSE FINE COARSE . MEDIUM FINE 12" 3" 3/4" 4 10 40 200 CLEAR SQUARE SIEVE ,()PENING .U.S. STANDARD SfEVE SIZE · · AD.DITIONAL TESTS (OTHER THAN SORING LOG COLUMN HEADINGS) MAX-Maximum Dry Density GS-Grain Size Distribution SE-Sancl Equivalent El-:-Expansion Index C.HM-Sulfate and Chloride Goritent, pH, Resistivity PM-Permeability · SG-Specific Gravity HA-Hydrnmeter Analysis AL-Atterberg Limlts RV-R-Value CN-Consolidation PP-Pocket Penetrometer WA-Wash Analysis OS-Direct Shear UC-Unconfined Compression MD-Moisture/Density FIGURE: BL1 CLIENT/PROJECT: -GTE JOB NUMBER: LOGGl=D BY: DRILLER: .al a. C1I G:' cp-E ~ 8 0 a, cu ~ a, (JJ I- b LL. ~ -J:. § co .... C C -a. QJ C1I 111 = .:?: CD 0 0 ::, ... ~ CD 0 0 -o CONSTRUCTION Tt:STING AND ENGINEERING, INC. TEST BORING RECORD DRILLING DATE: ELEVATION: DRILl,.ING METHOD: .8 ~ ~ ~ E !! >-c.o .Q ::, .... c.o .t: co a. BORING LEGEND ·o 0 ~ ~ 0 c.o DESCRIPTION :::::> -~---+--+---+--+--+ Block or Chunk Sample -- .... - -----... -X --~ ~--+---+----It---+--+ Bulk Sample ----5- -- SHEET: of "ffi C eo 0 .... ·-co ~ C1I "O I-~ ~ -..... -4---+---+--+--+-----+Thin Walled Army Corp. of Engineers Sampler - ---- ---- ~ -10-,...._ 14-~--1--t--~--+Standard Penetration Test' I-'"' --- _, .... -- I ~ --..... ' Modified Split-Barrel Drive Sampler (Cal Sampler) ---- -15- :---_, _1_, -~ -, ...... Groundwqter Table -_: ,.,. - ....:. -i,-, ------ -..; -20-: , I FIGURE: BL2 I PROJECT: . _.JOB NUMBER: LOGGED BY: DRILLER: Jl 'a. <P' E 111 C1J 111 (/J I:, .i:. +' a. ::!: ,111 Q . ,:J £0 -o --- ;__ --: - ·-- -5- -- -- -- -- .-10- -- --· -- ...., - -15- ,-- -' - -.,.. -- I -20- a,' ~ I- C a:, . .-e ... Q, ' 8 i.. -I £0 CONSTRUCTION TESTING AND ENGINEERING, INC . DAILY INDUSTRIAL 10 ... 1018. SEAN COLORADO CTE, 'INC. G:' ] c.:l ~ ~ ~ ~ E >, ~ !! (/J .Q ::, ,(0 +o (/J .c C .!! 0. 41 0 (.) ~ 0 ~ ~ (/J 0 0 ::> SM . ~ST BORING RECORD SHEET: 1 of 1 DRILLING DATE: DECEMBER 16, 1994 EL.EVATION: EXISTING GRADE DRILLING METHOD: GENERAL 440 with 411 cont. flight, solid-stem auger BORING·: 81 DESCRIPTION SCRIPPS FORMATION Mottled light orangish brown, light yellow, and light reddish brown, very fine to medium CLAYEY/ Sil TY :SAND, weakly indurated, medium dense, moist At 811, very fine to medium, CLAYEY SILTSTONE/ SANDSTONE with embedded sub-rounded ·. SILT$TONE/SANDSTONE concretions (<1 11 ), highly weathered, fissured, firm, moist Becomes increasingly dense with depth Aooarent rock contact at 3.0' Total depth 3.0' Borehole backfill~d 12/16/94 No groundwater encbur,itered 12/-16/94 jFIGURE: 81 . . , PROJl;:CT: JOS NUMBER: LOGGED BY: DRILLER: .JI a. ' cP" E a, IV 111 CD lb .I: .... .. a;, ·~ 111 ' 0 -o- --. -- --· -s-• -- -.- -- .,.. - -- -- -- -- -15- -- -- -- -- ! -20- :, co a, -~. I- C 111 -~ o·, 8 'I.&,, -' 0 C.Q CONSTRUCTION TESTING AND ENGINEERING, INC. : TEST BORING RECORD SHEET: 1 of 1 DAILY INDUSTRIAL DRILLING DATE: DECEMBER 16, 1994 10-.1018 ELEVATION: EXISTING GRADE SEAN COLORADO DRILLING METHOD: GENERAL 440 with 4" cont. GTE, INC. flight, solid-stem .auger G:' ] BORING: 82 (.) ~ ~ e:, ~ E ro !! >,. C ~ .~ CD . Q 0 .... :, ·-Oil to .... ' co .I: ~ a, C ' .! 0. " I-cu ·c.., !! I 0 0 DESCRIPTION :¥ i:?-·~ CD .0 0 :::, SM SCRIPPS FORMATION Mottled lighforangish brown, light yellow, and light reddish brown, very fine to medium SIL TY SAND with sli_gMt clay, moist, loose (upper 8" disturbed) At f,311 1 very tine to medium, SANDY/CLAYEY SILTSTONE with embedded sup-rounded SANDSTONE concretions {<211 )1 slightly moist, hard ~ Becomes verv hard Refusal to continued drilling Total depth 1.0' Borehole backfilled 12/16/94 ·' No .groundwater encountered 1"2/16/94 !FIGURE: 82 APPENDIX C REFERENCE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT OF ROUGH GRADING .. qEO'l'ECHNICAL REPORT OF. ROUGH GRADING Airport Busin·ess Centi:;-e,_ Unit Z Carlsbad, Califo~nia Prepareq. For: Sumitomo Bank of California South San Pedro Street, Suite 500 Los Angeles, California. ~ooi2 Prepareq-By: ICG Incorporated 2.992 La Palma, suite A Anaheim, California 92806 Job No. 05-9065-001~00-01 Log No. 3-.1063 April 2;1., 1993' .I-CG , .. incorparctt:ecl April 21, 1993 2992 La Palma, Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 714/632-2980 fax: 714/p32"9209 Other Offices in Irvine, San Diego, San Bernardino, and Palm Desert. Sumitomo Bank of California south San Pedro'street, Suite 500 Los Angeles, California 90012 Job No. 05-9065~001-00-01 Log No. 3-1063 Attent;i.on: SUBJECT: Gentlemen: Mr. Richard ¥. Hirota . _GEOTECHNICAL REPORT OF ROUGH GRADING Airport _Business Centre·, tJnit 2 Carlsbad, California 1.0 INTRODUCTION a. This report sulfimarizes the results of our geotechnical testing and observation services pe).:"formed between August 24, 1989 and April 2, 1990 for the rough grading of Airport Business Center, Unit 2, carlsbad; California. b. The grading contractor for the project was Astlef ord construction, Inc.. of San Marcos, California. civil engineering and field grade staking was provided by Bodas Engineering of Carlsbad, California. The 80-scale grading plans were prepared by Bodas Engineering. Sheets 3, 4 anq 5 of 6 were utilized as the base map for our Geotechnical Maps, Plates 1 through 3. c. The accompanying As-Graded Ge~teyhnical Maps (Plates 1 through 3) show the as-built geotechnical conditions at the site and the approximate_ locations of the field chnrcal Services. Construction Inspection a~d Tcstrng :t ' ,· Sumitomo Bank of California April 21, 1993 density tests. Job No. 05-9065-001-00-01 Log No. 3-1063 Page 2 The field density test results are provided in Table 2 . .a. ' A summary of the as-graded conditions, the grading operations,. and the testing performed are presented bel.ow .. Based on our ge9technicai evaluation of the as- ~raded conditions at the site., we-have presented ~reliminary recommehdatiens for future development of the site. 1.1 Authorization Preparation of this report has been accomplished approximately 3 years after completion of the grading qperations for the new owner of the property, Sumitomo Bank· of California. The. work was authorized by our c0ntract (P-SD-3-6200) d~ted February 26~ 1993. 1.2 Scope of Services our geotechnical services. for this project involved the following: a. s·ite reconnaissance to evaluate existing site conditions~ b. Compilation of field· a,nd laboratory test data. c. Preparation of As-Graded Geotechnical Maps. d. Preparation of the As-Graded Geotechnical Report. Sumitomo Bank of California April 21, 1993 2.0· SITE LOCATION/DESCRIPTION Job No ... 05-9065-001-00-0l Log No. 3-1063 Page 3 a. Unit 2 of the Carlsbad Airport Centre occupies a 70 acre parcel of irregular s}1ape located in Carlsbad, California (See Location Map, Figure .1). The site was graded to prepare 21 industrial ·1ots, 2. <;>pen space lots, and associated streets and other improvements. b. Prior to grading, the topography was characterized . by ridges and associated small drainages which generally flowed south and west. The lower pdrtibn of the main drainage course, par~llel and adjacent to Palomar Airport Road, has been preserved as open space. Maximum relief fo.r the site is about 240 feet,. wi,th elevations ranging from. about 90 to 330 feet above mean sea level. c. Portions of the site were graded in 1986 in conjunction with grading of Unit 1, Palomar Oaks Way and Camino Vida Roble {Refel;."ence 17} •. · ~he locations of fills placed· during this grading are. indicated on the Geotechnical . Maps, Plates 1 through 3 . q. Gr:a<;ling of the site during this phase of grading generally consisted of cutting along the ridges and ·filling in th~ canyon areas to provide roadways and sheet-graded pads for future industrial development. The proj,ect a1so involved remedial grading f.or: i. slope buttresses and stabilization fills adjacent to lots 31, 32, 34, and 49. , . .. ·-., .. > .. ___ _::. • -· R~ :,,A ·, . " ':-t -,-·. '.,_r'_ ., J: _ ...... -. ~. m:i:,:.....t····:-: i.:~ :v ,,: r·1 i f V·'1 I ··---_ .. _ ;;! ·: .• \ u \ <._ \ l .; ··-.. ; ~-~,, <.. t '.. ,: ·!.... __ ,., \ \ \ 7 ~-.,-~• "·~. 1-·r!') \.j,, \'1 I ~;\ ! ___ ~...-\-~ \ :._! \ I \... -:~ \ . '-- 0 2000 '4000 ----FEET ' • C ( v .• \ •'\_) \..·.: ...... · .: ·1· ;' I ..J .. _.,_ ADAPTED FRO~ U.S.G.S. 7.5' ENCINITAS (1976) AND SAN LUIS REY (1976) QUADRANGLES LOCATION MAP JOB NO.: DATE: FiGURE: 05-'-9065-001, -0.0-01 APRIL. 1993 1 < ICG Incorporated Sumitomo Bank of California April 21, 1993 Job No. 05-9065-001-00-0l Log No. 3-1063 Page 5 ii. removal of compressible alluvium and portions of previously placed landfill adjacent to the airport. e. .The site is generally .in a s.imilar coridi tio.n to that when grading operations were completed in 1990, except as follows: i. A building and associated improvements have been constructed on ·Lot 37. ii. Monitoring wells have been placed on Lots 28, 29, 30, 34 and 36 by another geotechnical/environmental firm. These wells were presumably placed· to monitor/collect the presence of gases/leachate from . previous landfill on or adjacent to the site. iii. Partially backfill.ed backhoe -pits are present on Lots 39 and 41. iv. Erosion has damaged the fill slope on the southwest cern-er of Lot 3·9· -adjacent to Kellogg Avenue. v. All the lots have a light growth of annual vegetation and minor erosion gullies. vi. The slopes have been landscaped. and are generally . . perfoX111ing well. Wet ·~;reas on some of the pads indicate that watering o.f the slopes may be excessive. Sumitomo Bank of California April 21, 1993 Job No. 05-9065-001-00-01 Log No. 3-1063 Page 6 3.0 GEOLOGIC SETTING 3.1 Geotechnical Conditions a.. Geologic conditions prior to grading of the site are described in the referenced reports (References 12, 15~ 16 and 17). · b. Geotechnical conditions present at the conclusion of grading operations are shown on the Geotechnical Maps, Plates 1 through 4. c .. A. brief description ·of the soil and bedrock units at the site is presented below. 3~2 Bedrock Units a. Santiago Peak Volcanics (Map Symbol Jsp) The Jurassic Age Santiago Peak Volcanics Formation ·was ~ncountered in the northwestern ·portion o:f the site. The Santiago Peak fo~~tion is a series of mildly metamorphosed volcanic rocks. Regionally, the Santiago Peak Volcanics vary in composition from basalt to rhyolite. On ·the site they are predominately andesite. The Santiago .Peak Formation, a~ observed during grading, was high+Y jointedi with ~ariable joint spacing. Clay in-filling was usually present in joints near the surface, where weathering is more Sumitomo·Bank of Califolr'nia April 21, 1993 Job No. 05-9065-001-00-01 Log No. 3-1063 Page 7 p. pronounced. Weathering was found to extend to depths of 12 feet · in $.011te areas. Santiago Formation (Map. s:vmbol Tsa} The Eocene Age Santi~go Formation underlies most of the site. During grading this formation was observed to consist pf i:nterbedded claystones, siltstones, and fine grained sandstones. 4.3 . Soil Units a. Alluvium/Colluvium (Map s:vmbol Oal) Alluvial and colluvial soil on-site consisted of light to dark brown, silty to clayey, fine to medium grained sand with .some organics. Alluvium was located in canyons a_nd drainage bottoms, with depths l;."anging fr.om approximately 1 to 26 feet · within ·tne grad~d area.. Colluvium, ranging in depth from approxiIµ.ately 2 to 6 feet, mantled the upland areas and slopes. -The alluvium and colluvium were considered to be unsuitable and were removed to expose dense bedrock materials within the gr~ded a~ea. 3.4 Fill Soils a. . Fill soils consisted of on-site materials, excavated during grao..:j.ng, which comprised alluvium, colluvium and bedrock .. Blasting and heavy ripping of the Santiago Peak Volcanics produced a Sumitomo Bank of California . April, 21, ,1993 significant quantity of rock ·till in the canyon 45 and 46, as well Job No. 05-9065-001-00-01 Log No. 3-1063 Page 8 rock which was placed as a area below Lots 39, 40, 44 as bel.ow Kellogg Avenue. Oversize rock materiai was placed in a non- structural fi~l area north of Lots 39, 40 and 41. The soil fills, generally consisted of silty sands, silty clays, and sandy clays. b. Fills up to· approx:hnately 50 reet in thickness were placed during grading operations concluded in 1986 (Reference 17). The location of these fills are indicated on the Gecit~chnical Maps, Plates 1 through 3. These f 1.ils are similar to the soil fills placed during this grading operation. 3.5 Geologic Structure a. The geologic structure encountered during grading operations was generally as anticipated in the referenced reports and . can be characterized as gently tilted Eocene. sedimentary rock nonconformably over,ly.ing Jurassic metavolcanics. b. Bedding attitudes taken throughout the site suggest a 3 to 9 degree, west to southwest regional dip, al though steeper bedding was encountered in localized areas . . c. :No·evidence of faulting .was observed by our field 9eologic mapping during grading. Sumitomo Bank of Cafifornia April 21, 1993 3.9 Surface and Subsurface Water Job No. 05-9065-001-00-01 Log No. 3-1063 Page 9 a. Prior to grading, the major drainage adj a cent to Palomar Airport Road contained a small stream, apparentiy ted by.seepage from nearby develop~ents. A subdrain installed during. grading below Lqt _29 was designed to intercept this seepage. The subdrain discharge:;; into the natural area below the toe of the newly constructed fill slope on Lot 26. No other seepage was observed during grading. b. surface drainage within the graded site is designed to flow into d'esilting basins and storm drains. Brow ditches direct ·sur;face wa1;:er on perimeter slopes to the storm drain system or dissipaters at the toe of slopes. 4.0 GRADING OPERATIONS 4.1 General a. The site grading is shown on the 80-pcale plans developed by B9das Engineering Incorporated. Copies of these plans $erve as a base map for our As~Graded Geotechnical Maps, (Plates 1 throu1h 3). b. Site grading was performed using conventional cut/fill mass grading techniques with heavy earth- moving equipment. The grading operation began with alluvium and qolluv.ium. removals in canyon areas. On9e . alluvium was removed, subdrains were SUlllitomo aank o.f Cal±f-ornia April 21, 1993 Jqb No. 05-9065-001-00-0l Log No. 3-1063 Page 10 -' ' . _,__ .· constructed in canyon or removal bottoms. Bedrock cuts., including removals of surficial colluvium, were then performed, with the material generated being. placed as .compacted fill in the canyons. The mass grading generally progre~sed from the s.outheast toward the northwest portion of the site. c. Drilling and blasting was· requ-ired in the northeast portion of the site where hard metavolcanic rock was encountered. 4 .2 · Preparation _of· Na_turai. Ground The site was first cleared of su}:)surf ace obstructions and . . s~r.ipped of vegetation. Topsoil, colluvium, alluvium, and existing uncompacted fill;:; were removed to bedrock prior to placing fill. The exposed subgrade was scarified to a depth of 6 to 8 inches, moisture conditioned, and compacted. 4.3 _Soil Types The representative soil types used as fill material are tabulated in Table 1, "Laboratory Test Results". The maximum density . and optimum moisture of the soils was determined by ASTM ·01557-78 (Modif,ied Proctor Method). All fill material was derived from_ on-site or immediately adjacent sources. The fill generally consists of silty, fine to med':iqm sahd (SM), sandy silt (ML), and silt-clay mixtures (CL-CH). ,. 1. I •. l , I 7 _] l i l _J .. J I .J Ji 0 Sumitomo Bank of California April 21, 1993 Job No. 05-9065-001-00-0l Log No. 3-1063 Page 11 Roc::k fill, derived from ·. blasted Santiago Peak metavolcanics, consisted of fairly well graded angular ~hot rock ranging up to occasional 24-inch maximum dimension rocks. The rock fill also contains fine grained sand and clay. . 4,. 4 Fill PlacemeFlt and Testing a. b. c. Fi.l.l soils were typically placed in t? to a-inch lifts, brought to approximate optimum moisture content, and compacted. The compaction equipment con~isted of self-propelled rubber-tired compactors, scrapers, sheepsf oot rollers, and other heavy earthmoving equipment. Density tests were conducted in accordance with ASTM D2922-86 and ASTM 3017-78 (Nuclear Methods). Results of the density tests Appendix c, "Fi(;?ld Density are tabulated in Test Results". Approximate test loc~tions are shown on the accompanying "As-.Grac~J..ed Geotecnnical Maps", Pl.ates , 1 througn 3. The test elevations and locations were estimated from field grade stakes and extrapolated from the project plans; further accuracy is not imp'lied. Rock fill generated by cuts in the area of Lots 37, 38, and '39 was placed as structural fill under Lots 39, 40, 44, 45, · and 46. A per:forrnance standard for rockf ill compaction was established based on a testf il.l in accordance with the recommendations in References 6 and 7. sumito~o Bank of California April 2'1, 1993 Job No. 05-9065-001-00-01 Log No. 3-1063 Page 12 4.5 Cut/Fill Transitions At the conclusion of mass grading, sever,al of the pad areas had cut/fill transitions (contact between bedrock and fill) exposed at the surface. These lots include Lot 28; 30, 31,· 32, 33, 34, 3!5, 36, 37, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 4 7, 48 an~ 49. The· approximate locations of the cut/fill transition is' indi~ated on the Geotechnical Maps, ·p1ates 1, through 3. 4.6 Slopes 4,. 6.1 Fill Slopes Fill slopes were generally constructed at slope ratios of 2: 1 (:t?-orizontal :vertical) or flatter, to a maximum height of.about 65 feet. Fill keys , were excavated at the toe of the slopes prior to filling. Fill slopes were built either b.y overfi 11 i ng_, then cutting back to grade, or by backrolling with a sheepsfoot roller· a:t;: intervals as the fill was brought up. Finishing was done by track-walking the slope -·face with a dozer. Cut Slopes Cut slopes were generally graded to a slope ratio of 2:i (horizontal:vertical) or flatter, with a maximum·height of about 30 feet. Cut Sumitomo Bank of C~lifornia April 211 1993 Job No. OS-906s-001-oo-01 Log No. 3-1063 Page 13 4.6.3 4 •. 6 .. • 4 4.6.5 slopes were mapped PY the project geologist to document geologic conditions. Buttress Fills The cut slope between Lots 33 and 34 ·was constructed as a buttress fii1 to stabilize a cl,ay· seam found during ·grading operations. The buttress wa-s constructed in accordance with the recommendations provided in Ret erences 11, 12 and 14. The approximate 1-ocation of .the key and backdrain is indicated on the Geotechnical Maps, Plates 1-3. Stability Fills S1-qpes designed i::l.S cut slopes adjacent to Lots 31, 32, 34 and 49 were constructed. as stabilization fills to replace materials particularly ~usceptible to erosion and surficial .:j.nstabi] i ty A The fills were constructed with keys and backdrains in accordance witb the recommendations provided in References 11, .12 and 14. The approximate locations of the keys and backdrains are indicated on the Gebtechnical Maps, Plates 1- 3. Natural.Slopes Off-site natural slopes where potential instability could directly affect the design Sumitomo Bank of cal'ifornia April 21, 1993 Job No. 05-9065-001-00-0l Log No. 3-1063 Page 14 4.6.6 slopes and building pad:;; constructed for this development were grading. Durin~ evaluated prior to the the grading, our field personnel verified that no adverse geologic conditions were encountered which would reqUire additional remedial measures. Subdra:Lns and Backdrains a. $ubdrains were placed in the major canyon bottoms after alluvial removals had been completed. · The subdrains consisted of perferated PVC pipe surrounded by 3/4" open graded. crushed rock and wrapped in geofabric, consistent with the ;recommendations in our referenced geotech:nical reporb:; (References 11, 12 and 14). ~pproximate subdrain locations are showa on the As--Graded Geotechnical, Maps (Plate$ 1 through 3) • The subdrains 'are outletted into storm drain systems or discharged to surface grades. b. Backdrains were insta],.led along the heal of the keyways for the buttress and stability fills constructed adjacent to Lots 31, 32,34 and 49. The approximate iocations are shown on the Geotechnical Map, Plates 1-3. Sumitomo Bank of California April 21; 1993 Job No. 05-9065-001-00-0l Log No. 3-1063 Page 15 5.0 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5.1 General. a. We consider that the grading and earthwork . operations carried out · under our observati9n and . . testing were performed in. general-accordance with the intent of the recommendations presented in our referenced geot~chnic;:al repo+ts (Appendix A) .and · with the requirements of the city of Carlsbad. The conclusions and recommendations contained herein are.based on our db$ervations and testing services performed from August 24, 1989 through April 2, 1990 • . b. Plans for subsequent development of the site should be forwarded td the Geotechnical Consultant for review and comment wit);l regard to .speqific grac;ling and foundation· design criteria' as these plans .become available. A geotechnical investigation will be required.for each lot to develop specific grading recommendations and foundation criteria for propos~d structures. 5~2 Slope Stability Cut and Fill Slopes B~sed on our observation and testing, cut and fill slopes at the site were constructed in general conformance with our recommendations and the . grading requirements of the City of Carlsbad. Sumitomo Bank of California April 21, 1993 Job No. 05-9065-ocn-oo-01 Log No. 3-1063 Page 16 Previous slope stability analyses (see Referenced Reports) indicate that cut and fill slopes within these lots have factorf? of safety in excess of generally accepted minimum design criteria (Factor-. ' . of-Safety = 1. 50) • Both cut and fil;I. slopes are expected · to-pe,;f orm favorably with respect to surf icial stabil.i ty if d:rainage devices are maintained and slope maintenance is implemented. 5 .• 3 Settlement Based on the fill thickness placed during this · and previous grading· operations, it is our opinion that development of commercial/industrial structu~es at the sit~ is feasible,· provided that potential fill settlements ~re evaluated and incorporated in the design ~f the proposed st;.ructures. :J:n particular, building locations on Lots 2-8 through 31, 33, 36, ·and 40 through 46 should be evaluated during the early planning stages dqe to considerable differential fill thicknesses. It is recommended that the Project Soil.s . ;Engineer., Civil Engineer, Structural Engineer and· ~rchitect should review and evaluate the loc.ation and type of all structures with respect to the potential settlement of the fill materials. 5.4 Foundation Design Criteria General Geotechnical conside_ri;itions that will influence foundation design among other _tpi,ngs include: Su~itomo Bank of California April 21, 1993 Job No. 05-9065-001-00-01 Log No. 3-1063 Page 17 a. The bearing capacity·. characteristics of the soil and bedrock materials on-site. b. The expansive nature of the on-site soils. c. The consolidation characteristics of the und~rlying soils and bedrock. A site· specific geotechnical investigation is recommended for all future.development planned·for _the subject mass graded lots. Plans for subsequent development of the subject lots should be forwarded to the geotechnical consultant for review to evaluate the proposed grading -and construction with respect to the geotechnical features of the site .and to provide recommendations· for specific structural foundations and associated improvements. 5.5 Transition Buiiding Pads Where building pads are located such that they span across a transition from cut to fill,. remedial grading and/or appropriate structural design may be required to mitigate the ~otential adverse effects due to non-uniform bearing characteristics of the underlying materials. When the fill portion of such pads is shallow, remedial grading consisting of overexcavation of the cut portion of the pad to a ~inimu~ depth of three feet below finish pad grade and replacement as ~o~pacted fill is generally sufficient to provide uniform bearing characteristics for most structures. We recommend that the Soils Engineer evaluate transition areas and provide appropriate .. Sumitomo Bank of California April 21, 19·93 ~ob No. 05-9065-001-00-0l Log No. 3-1063 Page 18 recommendations as plans for future development become available. 5.6 Drainage and Slope Maintenance a. Surface Drainage Pad drainage should be designed to collect and direct surface waters away from proposed structures to approv~d drainage 'facilities. For earth areas, a min.imum gradient of two perc~nt should be maintained and drainage should be directed toward approved swales or q.rainag_e facilities. Drainage patterns approved at the time of fine· grading should be· maintained throughout the life of proposed structures. Even when these measures are taken, a shallow grou11dw~ter or surface water .condition may deyelop in areas wnere no such water ,c;::ondition existed. prior to site development; this is particularly true where a ·substantial increase in. .surface. water infiltrat.ion results from landscape irrigat:i,on,. We recommend that landscape planters either not be located next to buildings a-nd pavement areas, or be properly drained to an appropriate outlet. S.lope drainage devi.ces have been constructed in accordance with applicable standards. On-going maintenance· is necessary to allow proper performance of these devices. . Sumitomo ~ank of Cali!o~nia April i1, 1993 Job No. 05-9065-001-00-01 Log No. 3-1063 Page 19 b. Subsurface Drainage Subsurface drainage devices, including canyon subdrains and drains in stabilization and buttress keys wer·e installed i11 acc<;>rdance with our recommendations. The locations and types of drains installed are presented on the Geotechnical Maps, Plates 1 through 3. All drain outlets should be maintained to prevent burial or blockage. c. Maintenance of Slopes.and Drainage Devices Maintenance of slopes and drainage devices is important to their long-term performance. The f.ollowing is a. list of suggested procedures provided as.a guide for slope maintenance. i. Drainage Devices • Graqed berms, swales, area drains, and ~lopes are designed to carry surface water from · pad .areas and should not be blocked or destroyed. Water should not be allowed to pond in pad areas, or overtop and flow down graded or natural slopes. ' • Sources of uncontrolled water, such as leaky water pipes or. drains, should be repaired if identified. • Dev·ices constructed to. drain and protect slopes, including brow ditches, berms, terrace drains and down drains should be maintained r.egularly ,. and in particular, should not be.allowed to clog such that water can f.low unphecked over slope faces. Sumitomo Bank of California April 21, 1993 Job No. 05-9065-001-00-0l Log No. 3-1063 Page 20 • Subdrain outlets should be maintained to prevent burial or other blockage. ii~ Slopes •· Slopes in the southern California area should :Pe planted with appropriate drought-resistant -vegetation as recommended .by a .landscape architect. • S.l.opes . should not be overirrigated. • Heavy ground cover combined with overwater:i.ng is a primary source of surficial slope failures. Animal burrows can serve to collect normal s:Qeet flow on slopes and cause rapid and· destructive erosion, and should be c;:ontrolled or eliminated. • · Modification to slopes, including all placement of fill materials or excavations that -steepen or otherwise .modify designed slope angles should not be attempted without direction or approval of the Soils Engineer. 5.7 Subsequent Grading -Operations P+ior to the commencement of· additional grading operations on-site, including precise grading ·and backfilling of trenches and retaining walls, the Soils Engineer should be notified to provide appropriate recommendation~ and observation and testing services as :required. Sumitomo Bank of California April 2.1, 1993 Job No. 05-9065-001-00-01 Log No. 3-1063 -Page 21 5. _8 Plan Review As foundation and grading 'plans are completed, they should be forwarded to the Geotechni_cal Consultant for review for conformance with the recommendations herein or to pr.ovide additional recommendations as necessary. 9.0 LIMITATIONS OF :INVEST:IGATION a. our investigation was performed in accordance with the ui;;ual and current standards of the profession, as they ~ relate to this and similar localities. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is provided as to ·the conclusions and professional advice presented in this report, - );>. -i. The samples taken ~nd tested, and the observations performed are considered to be representative of the subj,ect site; however, soil and geologic conditions can vary sign;i.f_icantly between sa111Ple locations. · ii~ -The test location elevations shown in Table 2 are based on surveys done by others. c. Any changed conditions revealed during construction should be brought to 9ur attention immediately for our evaluation. d. This report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the Owner, or of his ---··- Sumitomo a·ank of California April 21, 1993 Job No. 05-9065-001-00-0l Log No. 3-1063 Page 22 ;r~presentati ve_, to ensure that the information and recommendations cont~ined herein are 1::>rought to the atterit1.on of the Arch'i.tect and Engineer for the project and incorporated into the pl~ns, and that the Contractor and Subcontractors implement such recommendations in the field. e. our grading observations .and test results presented in this report are. limi~ed to those grading operations performed between August 1989 and April 1990. The findings of this report. are· considered valid as of the later date. However, changes in the conditions of a site can occur with the passage of time, whether they be due to natu:ral events· or to human activities. on this or adjacent sites. In addition, changes in applicable or appropriate codes and standards may occur, whether they result from legislation or the broadening of knowledge. f. Accordln9ly, the f~ndings of this report may be invalid wholly or partial.ly by changes outside our control. Therefore, th-is report is subj-ect te-review and revision as changed. conditions are Ul~ntified. g. This report is subject to review by the local regulating agency. Sumitomo Bank of California April 21, 1993 Job No. 05-9065-001-00-0l Log No. 3-1063 Page 23 The opportunity to be of service is appreciated. If there are any questions, please do not hesita1:e to contact our office. Very truly yours, !CG Incorporated PAT/HW/TGH/lh Thomas G. Hill, ·Registration Expi Vice PresidentX.£~ie Distributi9n: · ( 6) Addressee Attachments: 1. 2. ~-4. Appendix A Refe.rences Table 1 Laboratory Compaction Test Resuits Table 2 ~ field Density·Test Results .Plates 1-3 · · As-Graded Geotechnical Maps/Test Location Plans Job No. 05~9065-001-00-0l AP,PENP:IX A References Log No. 3-1063 Page A-1 1. ICG Incorporated, August ·3, 1990, Discontinuance of Geotechnica1· Services, Carlsbad Airport Centre, Unit 2, carlsb~d, Ca:tifornia, Job No. 05-4879-016-0l-(10,30,40), Log No. 0-2203. . . 2. ICG Incorporated, Apri1 .25, 1990, Letter Regarding· Well Abando~ent, Pa;l.omar Airpqrt Centre, ·1921 Pal.omar Oaks Way, Carlsba(l, California, Job No. 05-4879-016-00-00, Log No. 0-1535.. . . 3. · l:CG, Incorporated, Pecember 4, 1989, Revised Recommendations for Soil Cap on Soil/Rockfill, Carlsbad Airport Centre, ·Unit 2, Carlsbad, Calite>~nia, Job No. 05-4879-016-0l-10, Log No. ·9-2454. 4. · ICG Inc.orporated, November 17, 1989, Soil Corrosivity-Tests "fbr Hilfiker Wall, ·Palo:mar Airport Centre,·: Unit· ·2, Carlsbad, California, Job No. 05-4879-016-00-10, Log No. 9-2403. · 5. ICG Incc,rporated, November· · 15, 1·989, Geotechnical Recommendations · for · Retaining Wall, Palomar · Airport Centre, Unit 2, Carlsbad, California, Job No. 05-4879- 016-01-10, Log No. ~~2394. 6. ICG Incorporated, November 9, 1989, Rock Testfill-, Carlsbad Airport Ce;ntre, ·unit 2, Carlsbad, California, Job-No. 05- 4879-016-0l-10, Log No. 9-23~3-. 7. ICG Incorporated, October 27, ·1989, Compaction Testing in ·Rockfill, Carlsbad Airport centre, Unit 2, Carlsbad, California, Job No. 05-4879-0·16-0l-10, Log No. 9-2310. 8., ICG Incorporated, October 2.6, 1989, 9oil Corrosivity Tests for Hilfiker Wall, Palomar Airport Centre, Unit 2, Carlsbad, California, Job No._ ·05-4879-016-00-10. 9. San Diego Geotechnical Consultants, September 27, 1989, Recommendations for Placing oversize Rock in Offsite Fill, Carlsbad Airport Centre, Unit 2, Carlsbad, California, Job No. o~-4879-:-016-00-00, Log No •. 9-2160. i . Job No. 05-906,5-001-00-01 APPENDIX A References (Continued) Log No. 3-1063 Page A-2 10. San Diego Geotechnical Consultants, August 30, 1989, soil Parameters for Retaining Wall Design, Palomar Airport Centre, Unit 2, Carlsbad, California, Job No. 05-4879- 016-0Q-10, Log No. 9..:.2041. 11. $an Diego Geotechnical Consultants, August 9,. 1989, Addendum to Additional Geotechnical. · Investigation, Airport Business Centre, Unit ·2, Carlsbad, California, Job No. os-4879-016-oo-oo. 12. San. Diego Geotecpnical Consultants, August 7, 1989, Additional Geotechnical Investigation, Carlsbad Airport Centre, unit . · 2; Carlsbad, California, Job No.· 05-4879-016-00-00, Log No~ 9-1868. 13. San Diego Geotechnical Consultant_s, July 13, 1989, Well Abandorunent Permit, 1921 Palomar Oaks Way #300, Carlsbad, California, Job No. 05-4879-016~00-oo. 14. San Diego Geotechnical Consultants, July 3, 1989, Supplemental Rec0inmenda.tiorts ·for Grading, Airport Business Centre, Units 2 and 3,_ ca·rlsbad, .California, Job No. 05-4879-016- oo-oo., Log No. 9-:--1818. . . '· 15. San Diego Geotechnical Consultants, ·July 29, 1988, Supplemental Geotechnical Investigation, Carlsbad Airport Centre, Unit 2, and Offsite. Fill Area, Carlsbad, California, Job No. 05-4879-011-00-:-0,0. 16 • H. V. Lawmaster & Company, Inc. , 19 8 O, Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation, Pr9poseci-Palomar Business Park, North San Diego County, California: Unpublished Report No. 79- 9394/654G to Palomar Business Park, January 15, 1980 (includes grading plan review letters dated June 8, 1982 and September· 27, 1982). · 17. . Moore & Taber, 1987, Report of Geotechnical Services, Carlsbad Tract· No~ 81-46:, Airport Business Center, Unit No.· 1, . City of Carlsbad, California: On.published Report to Centre Development Company, February 2~, 1987. . . .TABLE 1 LABORATORY COMPACTION TEST RESULTS JOB NO: ____ ·~0=5~-=9~0~6=5~-~o~o-=1~-~o~o_-~0=1------------"-.-DATE: ___ A~p~r=1~·1=-=1~9~9~3~- PROJECT NAME: ____ -=s..::::u=m=i-=t=o=m=o-=B=a=n=k-=o=f-=C=a=l=if=-o=r=-=n=1=· a=-------------- TEST NO. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 iO .11 12 13 14 SOIL CLASSIFICATION Medium · Brown si.l ty sand Medium Grey Brown Silty Clay Light Grey Brown Tan Silty Clayey Sand Weathered San~ia.go. Peak yolcanics l;3rown Clayey Silty sand. Yellow Tan Clayey sand Grey Blue Silty Sand Class 2 Base Light Brown Sand (Shade Sand .. for storm Drain Backfill) Class 2 Base Class 2 Base Dark Brown Silty Clay Green Tan Sandy Clay. ' Class 2 B~e OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT (%) 12.9 16.8 14.5 15.1 13.0 14.5 12.8 6.1 7.6 7.4 7 .2. 12.4 15.7 6.4 ! MAXIMtm DRY DENSITY (LB/FT3) 119.1 121.6 113.5 116.6 115.3 114.5 118.0 138.0 134.9 137.2 134.7 122.0 111.0 138.6 ~. ,. i't1='ji?C, i'ia!:!e; P.iR?J~: Bt!5I~ESS LENT~~,.-u~rr 2 TABLE 2 Page i 1 Field Density Test Results E!eva,ic,n Curve No, Fill Fill .,. .. Te~t Test & Maxi1P.•Jrn Mc·ist.ure Dry Relative ,est: or . ~timber D;;te Lc,catior, Deptii Dry Iier,!:ity Cor,ter;t Der1sity Co1cpactie<ri Remarks 198'3 ifeet) ic-cf>. (oer~rit) (pcf} (percer,tl (see leger,d) ------------------'0-3112 SEE MAP 192' 1 119 15.9 1(17 91 ('3(1} NU 2, 09/12 5E£ l'lAP 193 4 116 i7~ 1 106 92 (90) NU .J 0'3/13 SEE /l'JlP 195 3 f!j 17.9 104 93 (9(1} NU 4 OS/13 SE£ KAP 197 3. 1i3 15.1 104 92 (90) Nli 5 (19/13 SEE MAP 19'3 4 116 16.5 -105 91 (90} NU·· 6 09/13 SEE fi!P.P 200 4 116 18.0 105 91 (90} NU 7 09/13 SEE NAP &12 4 !Hi 18.2 108 93 (90) NU B ~/14 SEE M.O M 4 116 17.6 106 92 (90) NU ·1 09/H SEE Y.P.? 206 4 116 16.J 106 92 (90} NU 10 09/14 SEE MA.Ii 207 1 119 17.5 108 91 (90) NU .. 09/14 SEE MAP 2(18 1 119 14.1 107 90 (90) NU .... 12 09/15 SEE.l"iAP 209 3 113 15.8 103 92 (90) NU 13 09/15 SEE MAP ., 210 4 !16 16.7 107 93 (90) NU 14 (19/l~ • SEE ,MAP 212 4 116 16.1 105 91 (90} ~'U 15 (19/15 SEE MAP 192 4 116 13.1 105 91 (9(1) NU ~ 15 09/15 St:.t: fi'JlP 214 3 1-13 15. t 103 92 (90) NU 17 09/1~ SEE.MAP 194 4 116 15.5 106 92 (90) NU 18 09/15 SE£ MAP 195 4 116 16.3. 106 92 (90). NU 19 09/18 SEE M.iiP 1'37 ~-. 121 ia.1 109 ,91 (90} NU .. 20 09/lij SEE Y.AP 193 4 116 17. 6 107 93 (90) NU 2:! 09/18 SEE.:i,AP 20i 4 !16 17.8 106 92 (90) NU 22 (:9/16 SEE M.C;P 2ec 4 U£ .~ " 106 91 (90) NU l,J • ,.c 23 -~•9118 SEE ff.AP 2(t~ 4 116 1(1.7 103 ,o (9(1} R-24 NU -24 09/18 SEE r.P.fl 20f: 4 116 15.6 105 9! (90} Nil 25, _OS/18 SEE fr!AP 2(14 3 113 15.7 102 91 · (90) NU 2£ 09/ 18 . SE£ ~:A;; 2(•7 3, 113 lb. 2 102 51 ('30) NLI 27 09/19 SE r-!Aj .211 3 113 _;6.4 102 90 (90) NU 28 0'3/19 SE£ MAP 20b 3 113 15.5 lOZ 9! (90) N" u 29 09/20 SE: l!'.:Ji-i 2(;7 3 !J3 If< c, .. o,i • .J !(>4 92 (';,1(1} NU 30 09/20 ScE MAP 213 3 . ll,3 18,(1 102 91 (9(l) NLI 31 09/20 SEE MAP 2!7 3 1·-18.1 103 9:-('30) NU ,J 32 03/20 S~t t:il~ c'.(i,';, 3 113 lB. () 102 91 (90} NU 33 09/2(1 S~E :,tq~ 218. 3 !!3 17.6 We 91 (90) NU 24 (19/2! 'SEE :-;P.~ c·2•J ::: 113 19. 9 102, g(i (9(1) Ki 35 (•~/21 SE:: ;-.:qp 211 3 113 1B. 3 102 '31 {90) NU 3S ::)9/21 S::E_~~~ 2;'3 3 .J.J.3 17. -1 102 9! ('30) ~Lt 37 . (:9/~~ s~~ !~;.p 2,:2 11 '3 18. 7 1(17 '30 {'j!)) 1•1, l\l.' Ji:, :)':/2: SE~ ~·""• 'j• -4 ,, 116 i&.2 1(:5 ':fl i90) tJL1 ··l:-t·· L.1.: 35 (=N22 ~£~ .":~: ::·i:. 4 110 15.0 iOE, 9I \ 9(;) NU Rernarks ~~und ~ !W = Rec:u!red P~tcer,t 2c,r.19cu:~ :c·r-. P.~l'?· ::: i<e,!:'sted ,,r, T:2:t 1T1'1~ ::,C=5arid Cc,r,e, N~=l~UCl!:'ar. £:C=Dr'! ve Cyi. • Gi=Othe-r Pr~JEC! Naro~: AiF.PORT R,'SINESS CENTER! LIIHT 2 iABi.E 2 Page Ji 2 Field D~nsi~y Test Results Elevatic,n Curve Ne,, Fill Fill 7est Test rest C•r i Maxi11:ur~ i'loisture D,:y Relative !'il!Gber !late Lc-_catiw, Depth Dry Derisity Coritent · Demlity C'c,rr.oactieori Remarks 19BS ifeet} <pc-ff . (percent> (pcfl (percent:i (see leQendi -------------------------- 40 09/22 SEE MAP ~23 4 116 ;-~.5 107 92 (9(>) N(! 4i 09/22 SEE MAP 221 3 t f-' • .i.J 1B.(I 102 91 {90} NU 4=. OS/22 SEE MAP 218 7 113 18.b 102 90 (9(1} NJ .., 43 (l'.3/25 SEE M'·'"· .:1:-" 224 3 113 15. 9 ,03 92 i9(:) NU 44 09/C:5 SEE MAP 226 .(; 116 17.9 104 90 (9(1) NU 45 09/25 SEE jt!fjp 2"27 ·3 113 1~ r, b ... 102 91 (90} NU 46 09125 SEE MAP 229 3 11~ 17.2 103 '.:I!, (90) SC 47 0'3/25 SEE /i:AP 232 3 113 17.0 1(11, 92 (9(1) SC 48 0'3/~. SEE l'UIP 225 3 113 17.3 104 92 (9(1) NU -49 09/25 SEE l"J'!P 234 4 1~ 18.+. 105 ·91 i.9(>} NU 50 09/~ SEE l"J:!P 235 4 116 16.1 1~ 92 (90) SC 51 Q9/26, SEE li',Ail 236 .\ 116 16.5 106 92 (90) SC 52 09/26 SEE fl:AP 237 ·4 116 -16.2 106 92 (90} SC 53 09/26 SEE !'i.t:JP 235 5 H5 17.3 104 91 (9(1) SC 54 09/26 • SEE l'lAP 237 5 115 l6. 9 104 91 (9(1) SC ::r: 09/26 SEE MAP 238 5 115 17.9 103 90 i9(J) -SC !f3: ..,t.,J 55 09/26 SEE l:!AP 239. 4 116 15.·4. 104 90 (9(1) NU r:~ 0'31~) SSE fri.Ail 223 4 116· 15.2 104 90 (9(1) NU .JI ::~ 09/27 SEE MAP 239 !l3 15.7 103 92 190} Nl' . ~'O ~ .. r.,;i 09/27· SEE r.A? 240 ·2 1"'"H 15.6 109 9(1 {90) SC .,J .c. • 6(: (19/27 SE£ l':P.il 241 -4. 116 14. 9 106: 52 (90) NU ~f 0'3/Fi-si==-,..,,-. 22·4 4 1!~ 16.S 105 91 (9(1) SC !l. .__ r."'i!"' EZ tY:Ji27 5r~ l':A? 2'27 3 .,-16."B 104 S-3 (90) c-~ :;c. -~6 ~ ... 6~ 09/27. si:-::-r,g!J, .,,.-;., 4 jl -!7.0 104 so (9(l) • .. SC l,..AJO:. .... b ?,I:. OS/26 SEE lt'.P.P 217 3 113 17.0 103 92 (50) SC "'. GS 09/28 SEE MA;) 219 + 116 ' !5.1 105 9.:: (9(1) SC 55, (:9/-28 SEE !'t~? f:3(1 4 : jE, • r C' 16b 92 (9(1) N" AC-, J • LI ;T 09tZB S~£ rr,~p E3:.: i, 1~5 '~t:. 2 roii '32 (';f~lj !~J 5f. 0'.:1/28 -.SEE ~Jli) 222 3 ]!3 l~,3 104 Q'., {9{l} /I!:: ..... 69 05/29 5~-MP.? 2'24 . l!S !i. 3 107 ~i !9(1j SC .::c " JO 70 O'::i2'3 SEE r:AP 232 3 !13 10.2 103 Sc' ,;9(!j NL! ~1 09/2'3 s-i= i,'J}!i) 2··--4 ;1& !B.5 106 92 (90) N" ,_ l::-,,::, ,'.J 72 if3IZ'3 5Et MP.P i:,-:,c 4 116 ,-C' 108 94 ElO) !J;J L'-"' a I• .:I. 7~ (:'3/2~-. SE= MAf: 223 4 l.i·S 18. 5 j(:!5 Cj. i9~1J SC -· 74 0=i29 ,, __ !r.AP !f•,r 2 13j 16, S UO 91 (9(1i er- ~t:.c. .. c~ ....... 7~ ,j(:j1.)? S:E :i:f'.lP 236 -': 1i5 ,r .. 104 9(1 i9(J) "-U ·~-&.. 75 j,(Jj(:~ S~E MhP C,j4 3 : 1~· ~ f:. l 102 '31 ('3(l) :~u 77 l(f/-02 SEE ~;p 238 4 116 14.':i !05 '31 (3(1) NU 7e. !Ob:t'::. =~r ~:P.P :-·;i. !, l~E ~i.. tJ !OE. 52 (':Kl) SC ,...,c; ·r3 1(:/{12 StE :,:~.o : -:-•: 3 :~3 :$ .. ·3 ' !O:i ·;1 ~ j(:) -.- &....:;... Remarks Legend: i#lii -Req!lirec. ;?:·ce,,~ ~c,r~JcCt 1-0r:~ ~--~~ = ·1et&s:ccct fir"· -est -"~ SC::~ar,,j C·:•r,~ .. t-.L'~Nuc i ear, DC=Dri \11? Ct;·. iF:c'.Jt:,:::r r~. 1 ~ . ' ~ AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER, UNIT 2 Project Na.;ie: TABL.E ·j Page # J ... Field Density, Test Results Elevatic,n C11rve Ne,. Fil 1 -. '1 rl,. Test Tc.cs Test C•r & fliaxil!lur~ N:::,isture Dr·y Relat;ve tl°U!!i:iff Date location Depth Dry Density Cor,terit D!msity Compact i or, Remarks 1989 (feetl (i:c'!'i lpercer1t .l i!:Cfi (oercer,tl (Se!: le!{er,cil ----------------------------- 6r) !C/02 5££ MAP 217 r 115 10.4 10(1 67 (90} H-81 NU ,J 61 1(:i02 SEE MAP 217 5 1!~ .w 13. 9' l05 92 (90) t,t! 82 !'(lii)2: EEE ~lAP 231 5 115 ,.~z# 3 104 91 (90) NU 83 1.0/C,3 SEE P'.CiP 227 3 113 15 •. ~ I.OJ 91 (90) N" LJ 84 10/03 SEE l'!AP 2'40 5 115 .-C: .1.), ..J 104 91 (9(1) NU a::. 1(1/03 SEt l"ilP 242 4 11& 14 •. :2 105 91 (9(1) SC BS 10/(13 SEE MAP f:38 4 116 14. 1 104 90 (9(1} SC 87 10/(13 SEE M,qp 235 't 116 15.2 105 91 (90) NU BB 10/(14 SEE /fJ:lP 226 1 119 16.1 108 91 (90) SC 89 10/04 SEE MAP' 241 2 .121 16..3' .!09 '30 (90) SC 90 l0/(14 SEE fl'.AP 230 4 116 16.2 105 91 (90} Nil 91 10/04 SEE fl'JlP 235 4 116 13.~ 106 92 (9(1) NU 92 W/04 sg ~:AP 2~ 1 11'3 13.,6 !(17 90 (90) ~'ti 93 iO/O!t SEE MAP 245 5 115 14.1 103 90 ('30) NU 94 1010ft SEE MA~ 237 s 115 15.4 103 90 ·, (90) NL! 95 10/05 SEE t-'.AP 242 4 11~ 16.5 105. · 91 (90) SC ~, 9E, 10/05 SEE MAP 232 4. 116 15. 0 'J04 90 (90) NU '37 1wos S$ ~.fi;l 234 4 H6 16. 0 105 92 (9(1) SC 98 iO/ti:; SEE !IC.AP 250 4 H6 14,5 1(:4 90 (90) NU 99 !0/05 s~ M.~P 237 4 . 1!6 17,,2 1(14 9(1 ('30) ' NU 100 10/05 SEE ~AP 245 " 1!6 15.6, '105 91 (90) N'' u 101 !0/(!f; 5-c'" ~t: f"iAP 221 5 115 4":· -:, . ~'""'· \. 105 91 -(90} NU 1(12 l(l/05 · SEE MAP f:Ji4 C' .! HC' 1 .:.J g.o 105 er .c. .(90) SC 1(13 . J(;/05-SEE /1';;'.lP 248 '1 1 !fi Z7.6 ·zos 91 !90i NU .l{:4 10/0f. .SEE Nf::: 245 i19 14.-9 107 91 (9(1) SC l(:5 !(1/(!6 SE£ 11:AP 245 J 110 . -., 14. (1 !(17 90 (9(>) NU 11)6 10/0b SEE ~!C!P ·24i 4 as 15.2 ! (16 92 (.90) Nv !(J7 !C:/()Q StE !'if;~ 238 A, !l5 1~.! tt•C ,92 (90) Nu .. J~ 1'.\S '1(1.70, r:;-,-~jj'{;J 2:,0 4 ... J·4. (I ,,.e g1 (90} St .,_ ,,. it• ~V1..' IM j(:/(:9 SEE :,:f;p 227 ..J l '::; :S.5 l(i~ 9(l (90} NU :,:o 10i09 er--~-.::t r,:p;: (!/!7 i; ; i,b :6.4 105 '31 (9(1) NU 111. 1(1/0'3 S~E i'itlP 246 5 pc-13.(1 103 9(1 (9(1) NU ~J 112 l(l/(15 SE£ :,;;:ia 253 C ,,c-.~ . !(:3 90 (90) SC ... .l J.....: .:.O:•.'t ~13 10/(:3 S~E ~H:i 24& 5 • IC 14.7 !(>5 92 (9(1) NU :;..J 11· ::(1/(IS S£E K~~ 2ci: C" l 'C' 1'1.5 104 91 (90) SC • a'i .J,J ,J l,.J 115 ~~1i1.(1 5::£ ;Y:P.P 252 3 1!3 l~. (I !02 91 (90) NU i !f, !(:/;{: fEt r,g;, 251 .!, • f. ,,j •C ~02 91 (90) NU 1 .. ·, ' l. -,. :011c, s:~ r,:~:? 255 3 !l.3 i6.9 !03 '31 ('30) NU • I !!e j(J/:(. c:~-t::~~I 2AG 3 t ., j~,7 !02 91 (9(1) N..! --1.1·-..· :!··3 :·:1/ Z (; s:::: .... ~.:,, ,_.,.i-:, ... 242 5 ••C: j"_J •.: I ; ....... 1()4 '31 (9~1) NU Rern~!L~JlPnr11 (;/ii = riea,;,r;,,z' i:·e':~-:i~ -' .. 'H:= ;2!estE,G C•'f: :'Est ;ii!. SC:=S·a,,a Cor:e .. t;U=Nuc! ear. DC=Drive,·Cyl., OT=Other Lc,::!DE,2t' ! ,:,t:, = Pro J ect Na11e: AiliPORT KiSINESS CENTER, UNIT 2 TP.BLE 2 Page# '! Field Density Test Results E1evaticm Curve Ne,. Fill Fi!l ·iest Test Test or & Mc:1ilitnu~1 ~J.:,isture. Dry Relative NU!iber Date Locatfor, Degth Dry Den!iitY Cor,ter,t DPY1S1ty_ [.ou1pact ion iierr.cr;.:s 1989 ifeet} (pd) {percerrt) iocfl (perc-entl (see legeridJ -------------------------------- 120 10/1(1 SEE >:AP .258 3 1:13 17.2 103 92 (S(I) s~ 121 10/10 SEE Jl'AP • 255 .l 113 15.(J 1(13 52 i90i SC 122 lq/11 SEE !'!?JP 255 4 11£ 14.5 106 92 l!K:J NU 123 1(1/11 SEE MAP 254 4 llb 16,4 1(17 53 (9{)} r,u 124 10/10 see 111ap ~20 5 115 !3. ~ 102 B'3 (90) IH25 tti 125 10111 see aiap 220 5 115 ·rJ.2 104 91 (9(1) NU 126 10/11 see 111ap 243 3 113 13.8 !03 Sl (90) NU 127 Wff1. see ~p 239 4 116. 15. (1 104 9(1 {90) SC 128· 10/11 see map 240 3 113 14,5 102 91 (9(1} N'J ·129 10/11 see maµ 257 3 i13 14.6 103 92 (9(1) SC 130 1-0/12 see 11ap 2".ic 5 115 13. 6 104 91 (9(!) NU 131 1(>/12 see irap 2".,0 1 119 1i.o 107 90 (9(1) MJ 132 10/12 see map 220 5 115 15.1) 104 91 (90) N"u 133 10/12 se!! map 223 1 119 13.5 1(17 90 (9(1) SC 134 10/12 see ~p ,, c26 1 119 14.2 107 91 (90) SC l:~S 1oi1c: see map f'23 1 11'3 14.8 109 92 ('30) NU 136 iw~2 see fiap 22b 119 16,8 107 90 (90) NU 137 . 10/12 see map ·230 1· !19 14.8 108 9! (9(1} NU 13B 10/13 see i;ap 259 5 115 15,8 104 91 (90) Nll 13~ · 10/13 see ~iao 254 4 116 .13.3 106 92 (90) N=j 140 10/13 see !iap C.57 4 116 16.1. 108 93 (9:)) SC -1'1-1 1(1/13 see map 2j2 4 116 15. 9 105 91 i'30) NU 142 10/13 see caµ 249 1191 !3.5 !(f/ 90 (90) NLI 14J wn3 see ~ap 251 5·· ,.:: H.2 !04 90 (9(1} li!J ,_., .. _l't.i; 10/13 see r.;ao 2-'10 ·r: 115 13.5 103 ~-· (9(1) SC ., -J • 145 10/16 see map 248 5 ""' 13.1 103 9(1 (90) NU. 1 ",.J 146 i0/16 see li"..;;2 252 5 115 12. 7 103 5(1 (90) NU 1/.;7 !(,/16 see map 255 :: • jC 15.2, 104 90 (9(:) Nu ; .J- gs ioi1£ see r!12p 2Sl 4 l ltJ !S.3 105 · Sl (<.l(>) SC _jl;9. l(>/;5 see ma!:• 26(>· 4 • Ir 15. C> · 1(16 9,~ (90) ~r- !>ti ~ ... 15() 10116 see r.1ac f'.61 r 115 16, l !(14 91 (9(1) Nu ., ,c., J.0/15 see mao f;fi'! 5 115 16.2 11)4 91 (9(1) MJ .A..J• i.::"':, l't)l!E. see JJar, 2:.8 ~' 113 16, (l 103 91 ('30) SC .&...tL 15:< 1(1i1E· se_!! rr.a:i, 255 ;:, .. ,c.· 15.4 104 9! i90) N'J i,: .I 154 io/1£: see ;:,an 2£J l; 1'·1'" 14, 7 !1)6 92 (90i NU ••b 155 10/17 see ma;:,-"'\:'C: .. •1'"' 15.8 105 51 (90}, SC CwJ 1,b 15& 1.0/17 se1: ;;:aJ ··-c-o 1 11'3 17.4 W7 91 ('31)) NU .:_,._r_, 157 1'0i17 see r,:a;; 2&4 . 119 13,1 1'08 31 !9t)) NlJ 158 !(1/:? SE!: !:l2ij 2f,7 119 13 .. '+ 107' 91 (90) SC 15·3' !(1/17 :-~e i:;a:> ~::s -i-19 !'3,,0 107 '31 (·3(1) t,lJ I J I J Rem~Legend: 1 · (Ill!} = Requlfed Pet'~e:r: Cr:1r:1eauct i 0:'1. R-;;i; = tietestea cirr Tes-t t;;I,, SC=Sar,d Cc,rt~. NU=Nuc-lear, DC=E>rive Cyl., OT=Other ''ProJect' Name: AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER7 .u:-m 2 TABLE 2 Page; 5 Field Density Test ·Results -Elevation Curve N,:,, f=El Fil! Test Test. Test or & Maxih;ur~ i>tc,iE-ti;re Dry ttei,;tive Nuri?b~r Dc1te '"ocatfon Deoth Dry Derrsi-;y Cor,t1mt Dem;iiy Cc,r~i:~Ct j c!n ,i;;;,;,;r:.:: 1S69 (feet) ipcfl . ipercer,tJ .ipcfi (r:,erc:etit) (SeE' :.e~e,r,cii ------,-----------------------------------------------------------· 160 10/17 see mao 2EJ 4 116 J3., 8-105 01 <SC) NU J> lbl 10/17 see map. 269 • 119 14. 9 10i 'j(I (3(1) Nu • 162 !Jj/17 see rnap 26E, 119 15.6 107 so (SOi Mi 163 10/17 see .• ,ap 261 I 1 ~ 9 Hi.3 10a 91 i"30J ?~Ll • 164 10/17 s.ee ·map 2£E. 1 '119 .13,6 1,(:7 g(: (~Oi NU 165 ~(1/18 see map 265 5 1.15 14.4 104 91 (9(1) NU 166 10/'!B see~µ 268 4 116 14.6 i06 92 (9(1) SC 167 1oi1s see Map .270 4 116 14.3 105 91 (9(1} NU 168 ~0/18 ·s.ee 111ap 21ta " 116 16.4-105 91 (90) NU 169 l0/18 see map· .242 4 116 14. 9 105 91 (90) NU 1_70 10/18 s_ee tap 235 4 U6 17.0· -105 91 (90} SC 1-71 10/18 see map 230 1 119 17.6 108 91 190) NU 172 10/18 see llliip 232 1 119 n.s 109 92 (9(1) SC li3 i0/18 see map 24-0 4 116 15.9 105 91 (9(1} NU 17-4 10/18-see map 251) 4 116 14.9 105 91 (90) NU 1-"' l(l/18 S!?e lliiP 250 4 116 14.·2 105 91 ('3(>} NLi ~- I ..i 176 10/19 s~e 111aP 255 • '11.9 15.4 1(18 92 (90} NU ~ 17.7 10/1~ see nia;i .259 1 11'3 ~5.8' 109 92 (90) SC 178 10/19 sel? map 260 4 116 15. 7 105 91 (90} NU 179 10/19 see map 262 4 H6 15. 3 104 90 i90} NU 180 10/19· see, lilii!J c.70 5 115 }6. 4 103 90 {9(1} NU 181 10/19 see llii? 271 5 J•r 15.Q 10J 90 (S(I) ~,.. lJ ~'- 182 10/1'.:l see 11ap 258 1 119 12.9 107 91) (90} Nu 183 10/19 see rnap c.37' 4 116 11.B 103 90 i9C>} N;.r 184 10/1.: see -1:ap 250· 4 116 14,9 1(:5 91 i90} -NU 185 10/19 see ma;, 238 4 1i6 14. ~ !05 91 i90) NU lB6 10/20 see ft:aµ 237 -1 11'3 13.8 107 90 (90} NU 187 1(1/2(1 see ,~a~ 269 4 1!6 13. l 106 92' (9(li r,;u lll8 l(ii20 SEE 1,1a;:, 259 1 119 14.1 1()8 91 (90) SC !85 10/2(1 see map 255 1 119 14,3 1qs a· (9(•} ~-~. ~l _,, 19(; 10/2(> see ma::; 262 1 li9 lJ.3 1(15 ,92 i9(1) NJ 191 10/20 see map 265 I H9 13. 9 108 91 (90) NU • 182 1'0/2(1 see r,;ap· -:,rr 4 ,116 ,15. ,J 105 '31 (9(t} NU .. ..s.> 193 ~0/2() s2e map 258 4 H6 15'. 2 104 90 (9(1} NU lS4 Pt~o see man 258 1 119 14;5 1(17 91 (90) N'' '., 195 !0/23 see maµ 267 .. 1 11"3 .13. B 107 90 (9(1) NU 195 · 10/23 sec 111ao 259 l 119 12~ l 107 91 (90} N:J 197 10/23 see ~1a;:i 270 1 119 i5.6 107 90 (90) NU 1'38 1()/23 see ·map 252 l 119 16. i 107 90 (90) SC 19"1 '1(1/23 see ma:> f:61c I 119 13.0 Jll 94 (90) !"' , \U < fwJl!fil"JiLI.Rru?.Ml (Ji# i = Requh-!?C: ?erce!lt c~,mµacti 01:-i, R~#:t: = Retested c,n Test. ##, SC=Sarid ~,rie, t.U=Nuc 1 Eal" i ilC=Dr1ve Cyl., OT=Oti'ie:-- A, ProJec-t Name: AIRPORT Ri51N£SS CENTER! UNIT 2 !ABLE 2 Pa~e ii E, Fitla Dtn5it~ Tl!t RHulh El evat ic,rr Curve Ne,. Fill r:,·· . .dl Test Test Test or & Js;aximum Mc,istt1re Dry Relative Number D,_te Lc,catiori .Deotn Dry Density Ot.,r,ter,t f!Er.sity Cc,rcoact1or1 Remarks 1969 {feet) ipcf) (percent> (pcfi !oercer,tl (see leQendJ -------------------------------------______ ... _ 200 10/23 see iliap 26'3 l 119 13/3 108 91 ('30} NU 20! · 1012:!i see r,1a::: · 266 1 119 1'¼.9 11! 94 (90i NU 202 10/23 !:EE' tlap 264. C' 1,15 12.-4 105 92 i'M NU "' 203 10/23 see ma~ 270 l 1•Q 13.0 ... 94 i90) SC ,i~ lu 204 1()/24 see map 272 1 119 ,16.2 1(1'7 90 (9(1) NU 20~ 10/24 see map 271 1 119 16.9 108 91 "(90) NU 206 10/24 see niap 268 5 115 14.0 105 91 ('30) NU 207 10/24 see mao 269 5 115 15. 0 104 91 (90) NU 208 10/24 .see map 270 5 115 14.3 104 91 (90) NU 209 10/24 see ma~. 269 5 ll5 13.9 104 91' (90} NU 210 10/24 see r.ap 271 5 115 13.4 104 91 (90) NU 2H 10/24 see map 270 4 116 15. (l 106 91 (9(1) SC 212 ·10/24 see ilap 239 4. 116 15.1 105 91 (90) NU 2i3 10/24 see map 235 3 113 15.2 103 91 (9(1) NU 214 10/26 see r.ap ., 230 5 .115 13,2 104 91 (90) NU 215 10/26 see map 245 s 115 13.5 104· 91 (9(1) SC ~ 21'6 10/26 see r.ap 270 i5 1.15 1 'j C' 104 91 (90) Nil i;;,J 217 10/26 see a1ap 272 5· !15 13. 5 . 104 91 (90) ·NU ·. 218 10/25 see Eiii'il 267 4 116 14~ 7 107 93 (90) NU 219 10/26 see ma!) 270 5 115 14.4 103 '3(l (90) NU 22(1 10/26 see map 269 5 115 12.7 104 91 (90) NU 221 10/25 see 111ail 274 5 115 13.B. 105 92 i9(J} NU 222 1012.'l see ,iao 270 5 115 13. 3 103 90 (91)) NU 223, 10/27. see man· 276 5 115 !3~5 104 .9I (9(1) SC 224. 1-0/27 see J:a?-· 277 · 5 1 fl::' .1.J 14.5 104 91 (90) NU 2"25 10/27 see rr.ao 279: 5 1.15 13.'5 105 92.. (90} NU 226 10/27 se1.-ma::, 281 5 i 15, 13.0 106 92 i9(l) NU 221 10/27 see reap 26'.3 5 !15 12.4 105 q'.:-(90) NU _,._ 22& 10/27 !:.ee 1o1ap 2."37 ,, 5 115 13.3: 105 · 91 (90) NU ?•:,Q 10/27 see 1,12p 272 5 !l'~ 13. 0 1(14 90 (90) NU ._,._, 230 10/27 see map "jC'::: 5 115 12. 7 103. 90 (90) NU '-..Jt.f 231 10/27" see r,ap .264 5 115 13. 9 106 92 (90) NU 232 10/30 · see rr,ap. 268 2 121 14.2 1'~ o· (90) NU ,.:, J't 233 ·!(1/30-see mao 258 3 113 13.0 103 91 (90) NU 234 10/3(> see ,~ao 266 c i21 15.4 114 94 ('30i NU 23§-10/31 see mao -5 5 115 Hi.O 103 9(1 (90) .,NU 235 1(1/jf see 1i1ao -3 5·, 115 15.8 · 104. 91 (9(1) NU 237 i0/31 Eee mau· -6 5 HS 16.1 105 91 (9Q) NU 238 10/31 see mac -4 5 115 15.4 103 % ('30) NU 233 1013! see map 2i(i 5 1'15 15.1 1(17 93 i90) r,:n . ., Remarks Legeri: i (#ll) = iiequired P'ercent Cc,mpact i c·n! FHi# = Retest.::d on Test '#ti, SC=Sarid Ceone, N!J=Nuclear, DC=Drive Cy!.! OT=Other i Pi·c,.;i:c; Name: AIRPORT BUSINESS CE:{TER! v~JI T .,:. TABLE ~ Page~ 7 Field Density Test Results Ei ev at 1. ,Jr, ~urve No. Fill Fiil Test TE!jt Test c,r & !l!aximtJiu /l!oisture Dry lleiative Number Date Location Depth Dry Derisity Cor1ter:t Density Compactic,n Rerr:ari<s '1'389 i.feet) (pcfi (percent} (pcf) ipercer:tl ·(see iegendl ---.-~ ------------------------------------- 240 .10/31 see 111ap 272. C: 115 13.9 109 95 (90) NU ,J 241 10/31 see map. 262 5 i!5 14.2 '}(l~ 93 (90) NU 2.42 10/31 .see b1ap 2E.4 r • ,r is,5 108 94 i90} NU ,J !.hJ 243 Jl/01 see r.1ap 284 119 12. l uo 93 (9(1) NU 244 11/01 see map 2Bf, 113 12. 7 109 92 (90) NJ 245 H/01 see map 5 115 13.5· 105 91 (90) NU 24& 11/01 see liap -6 5 115 13. 0 101 ·BB (90) 252 NU 247 11/01 see ,1ap -6 5 115 14.9 104 90 (90) NU 24B 11/01 ~ee 111ap -262 5 115 17.l 107 93 (90) NU 249 11/01 see map ~62 5 115 16.3. J09 95 (90) NU ~,O 11101, see liaP 282 11.9 16.7 107 90 (90) NU 251 11/0i see illap 284 l 119 17.8 109 92 • (S(l) NU 2~2 11/01 see map -6 5 115 13.8 103 90 (90) NU 253 11/02 see wap 72 5 115 18.1 103 90 (90) NU 254 H/02 see map .. 73 5 115 17.0 105 91 {90) NU 255 .11/02 see map 71 5 115 1&. 5 108 94 (90) SC ~ 256 11/02 see· 111ap 73 5 115 15.0 195 92 (90) SC 257 11/03 !?E~ n1ap · 71 5 115 14.7 106 92 {90} SC 258 11/0J see map 74 r: 115 14 •. 9 105 92 (90) NU ,.J 259 11/03 '. 75 5 115 '15. 7 105 92. (9(1) NU see ~1ap . 260 ,11/03 see !lli!P 75 5 115 17.5 · 106 92 {90} NU 261 11/(16 see map 272 4 J'" 16.0 104 90 (90} NU 1b 262. 11/06 see map 273 4 116 17.8 1Q5 91 {9(1) SC 25l 11/(,6. see n1ap 274 4 116 , ,15. 3 106 92 (9(1i NU 264 11/05 s~ IJ)ap 276 4 116 t6.1 105 92 {90) Nu 265 11/06 see t1ap 278 2 121 15.0 109 90 (90) SC -:,re PIOti see map 280 4 116 1~.6 11)6 91 ego> NU .. o ... 267 11/(16 see map 2a2· 4 :16 16.4 105 91 (90) NU 258 !1/()6 see map 286 4 1l6 15. 6 105 91 (90) ND 269 1,!/0ti see map 284 4 !16 15.1 106 92 i9(l) SC 270 }1/(15 see p1ap 280 119 14. 2 107 91 (90) NJ 271 1li07 see·map 284 115 15.6 107 91 (90} N:J 272 ,11/07' see .a1ap 285 2 l2l 15.9 110 91 ('30) NU 273 11/07 see raap 285 4 !16 15.4 .105 91 (90) NLi 274 11/07 see i.iap 288 1 11g 16;8· 1Q7 90 (90) BS .:,-,r: 11/((f .see map 2a·a 1 119 14.9 108 92 {'30} rxu ""' ,J c.75 11/07 see ~;ap 273 .4 116 17. l 105 91 {90) Nu 277 11107 see map 276 • 11'3 17.9 l(i~ 92 (90) NU • 276 11./07 27~ 119 ,--108 91 (50i N" see rnap ! I, I 27"3 11/07 see map 290 5 115 16. 5 104 91 (90) . SC Remarks~ (#ii) = Required Percer1t ,Compaction, R-#11· = P.etested c,n Tes: #l!, SC=Sand Cone, NU=Nuclear, DG=Drive Cy L , GT=Oth;;r l r· 1 ) ~: ·1 ~ ,~ Io- ,-. ·J ,. ! I . i l 1_ .I i 1 l_j !J t·7 LJ·· I.J tJ> Test .Test Number Date 1589 Test Location 280 !1/08 see riap 2&; 11108 see ll!ap 282 lli:)8 :ee map 283 11/08 see map 2B<t ~ 1/0S see map 285 11/08 see 111ap 286 11/0B· see Map 287 11/08 see map 28S 11/08 see map 289: · U/08 see. map 290 ll/06 see 111ap 291 11/08 see 111ap 292 11/09 see ,nap 2g3 11/09' see 111ap 294 11/0~ see map . 295 11/09 see 11ap 2'".15 · 11/09 see map 2S7 !1/09 see map 298 11/09 see 111ap 2'39 11/(19 see map 300 11/09 see map .301 . 11/09 see map· 302 · 11/09 see ~ao 303 11/H>. · see Map 304 11/10· see map 3(15 3% .307 3% 309 315 316 317 318 3'!'.3 ,1/10 HliO !1/10 '! 1/.10 11/1(1 11/l~ 11/13 11/13 lJ/13 11/1:?; 11/13 1!/1~ 11/14 11/14 11/14 see·map see r.1ail see m8:J see map -see ma:i see mao see map see 1;ap see. map see mall see man· see map. see mao see 111ap see ma~ iABLE2 Field Density Tes~ Results· Elevatieir: or D~pth {feet) Curve Nb. Fill Mciisture Cc,r,ter,t (percer,tl & Maximuifl Dry Density (pcf) 292 5 f-94 5 263 5 270 5 260 5 264 274 296 295 271 275 277 298 297 276 269 277 278 270 271 280 273 274 272. · 274 ,275 275 274 273 278 268. 269 274 274 275 273, 276' 267 274 269 4 4 5 5 4 1 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 1 4 4 4 4 4 3 5 5 5 3 5 .5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 1 5 115 14. 3 i15 15.1 115 17, 5 115 17. 7 U5 16,0 · 116 116 115 115 .116. 119 1J6 116 i16 116 116 116 116 119 116 116 116: 116 !16 113 115 115 115 115 l15 115 !15 115 . 115 115 115 119 13,6 11.0 17.1 · 16.1 16.4 15, 0 14.8 13.'.8 14.2 15.5 15. 7 17.6 t8.5· 15.5' 13.6 17.5 15.7 15.8 17.5 i8,l 16,6 !6.3" 17. l 15.8 18.3 17. 5 15'.6 !7.7 17,b 15.4 16,5 13.0 12.5 Page# 8 Fill Dry [>erisity (pcfi Relative Compaction (percent> 107 93 104 91 103 90 106 '33 104 91 105 102 104 104 105 109 108 106 105 106 106 1(15 104 108 1(>6 105 106 105 106 1()2 1(>4 101 103 103 103 11)5 104 105 104 103 .10s· 104 10G 108 105 91 89 91 91 91 92 '33 92 91 92 . 91 91 90 91 92 91 92 91 91 91 91 '90 90 91 90 91 91 92 '31 90 92 90 93 91 92 Remarks (see 1 eger,ol (90i ('3()} (90) (90) (90) (9(1) (90) 291 ('3()} (90) (90) (90) (90) (90) ('30) (90) (90) (90) (90) (90) (9(1) (90) (90) (90) (90) (90) (90) (St)) (90) (90i ('.3(1) (90) (90) (90) (90) (90) (9(1) (90) (':lOJ ('3(:) NU SC NU NU SC NU NU NU SC NU SC NU NU NU NU SC NU SC NU NU NU NU NU NU Nti NU Nil NU NLI NU NU N':J SC SC NU NU NU NU lliU Remarks leger,d: {] . ·i!l#l. = Required P2rcer:i; Cc,raoac:ticm1 R-#tt = Ret2?teo pr, Test. ##·, SC=Sar,::i C<me. NU=t{uclear, DC=Drive Cyl. ! OT=Other ProJect ~air.e; AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER; UNii 2 TRBLE 2 Page# 9 Fiel'd Densjty Test Results Elevation Curve No. Fill ,.... 1 • ·rl •• -.I. Test Test or & !fiaxim1Jra lf:i:,isfore Dry Relativ1: IE!S, Number Date Locatior, Deptn Dry Der,sft y Content Density Gomoact i c,r, P.e1P.arks 1989 (feet} iocf) (percer,tJ (pcfJ (percent} (see leger,dl --------· -----------------------------.:.---------- 320 11/,14 see .111ap 273 5 115 15,7 105 92 (90) SC 32! 11/14 see map 270 s H5 16.2 105 92 (90) &C 322 11/14 see eap 272 5 l15 12.1 105 92 (90} Ni.J 323 11114 seeblap 277 5 115 13.2 104 91 (90} MJ 324 11/15 see Map 274 5 115 13.8 106 92 {'30} NU 325 1 l./ 15 see map 276 5 115 12, 8 107 94 (90} NU 326 14/15 see.map 276 5 115 15.1 107 93 ('30} SC 327 11/15 see 11ap 278 5 115, 15.5 107 9-4 (90) SC 328 11/15 see 11ap 280 5 115 13.7 103 90 (90} NU . 329 11115 see map 282 ,5 115 15.0 103 90 (90) NU 330 11/15 -see. 11ap 283 5 115 11.9 1(15 92 (90) NU 331 1ili5 , see map 225 5 !15 14. 9 105 S-2 (90} N'J 33Z 11/'15 see map 265 r 115 13,8 109 95 . (9(1) NU J 333 11/16 see map 223 ,5 115 J5.3 104 91 (90} NU 334 P/16 see map ,,, 225 4. 116 17. 7 1(17 ·93 (90} NU 335 0 11/-16 see·11ap 222 5 115 14.4 108 94 · (90) NU ll ,, 336 · 11116 see map 225 5 115 13. 9 110 96 (90) NU 337 . 11/16 see map 224 5 115 14.1 109 95 (9(1) NU 338 11/16 see raap ?-77 4 116 17.1 107 93 (90} NU 339 11/16 !?~ map· 27(1 4 116 17.9 106 9.2 (90} NU 340 11/ 16 see map 276 . 1 119 12.3 110 93 (90) SC 341 11/16 see map 272: 1 119 12.9 l!(I 93 (90) SC 342 U/16 see ,nap 276 1 119 13.4 110 93 (90) NU- 343 11/ !6. see· raap 2.74 ! · i19 H.6 110 93 (90} NU 344 11/16 see map 270 4 116 14.6 107 93 (90) NU 345 H/17 see map 273 1 119 12. 5, 109 92 (5(1) SC 346 1'1/17 see map 275 1 119 12.4 106 91 (90) SC 347 11/17 . see map 27~ 5 115 . 13. 3 !05 92' (90) NU 348 11/17 see l.'lap 274 1 1.19 13.0 107 91 (90) NL! 349 U/17' see map 271 5 I'"-, 17. 7 j(l,3 90 (90) 1"' -• .J "·" 3°5(1 11/17 see map 280 ~ 115 14.~ 106 93 f9vJ N:.J 351 11/17 see map 280 5 115 12.5 106 92 (9(1) N'' u 352 lJ/17 . see map 22.2 5 115 15.2 1(13 90 (90} ~r~ r~u .)._ti) 353" 11/17 . see map lj•:)C"· 5 1!5 15.6 1(14 91 (90) NU ...... ..i 354 11/17 see map 222 5 11.5 13. 4 109 95 (90} NU 355. 11/17 see map-225 5 1!5 14.1 !09 95 (9(1) NU 356 11/17 see map 226. 5 115 12.7 107 94 {9(1) NU 357-11/17 see map 228 5 115 13.6 108 '34 (90) NU 35S 11/17 ~ee map 227 ::: 1-14 14.5 10'3 95 (90) 1-iU ..! 35g H/20 see maµ 273 5 •t=: 14.4 i05 92 (9(1} NU ~ ... - Remarks Le~ mn, =·Required-Percent C'c,r,1~action, R-i!i! = Retest.er! c,r, Test. !!-#, SC=Sar,d Cone. NU=Nucl'ear1 DC=Dr1 ve Cy 1. , OT=Dther P.roJet't Harr.e: i:URPORT BUSINESS GENTER, UNIT 2 TABLE~ Page# 10 Field Otnsity Test Results Elevation Curve No. Fill Fill Test Test Test eir & "1axirAurn Moisture Dry Re'lative Number Date locatic,r, Depth Dry Per,sity Ceinter,t Density Cc,r.pact i c,n Remarks 1989 (feet) (pcf) (percent') (pcfl (percent) (see leQer1dj -------------- 360 11/20 see raap 266 3 113 17.0 !02 91 (90) , .. ,... .,,... 351 11/20 see map 285 3 113 15.3 104 92 (30) SC 362 11/20 ·see 111ap 235 3 113 1::, C" ,:;,J 98 BB (90) 363 NU . 363 11/20 see ~,ap 235 3 113 '4"(: 103 91 (g(l) NU 364 11/20 see map 268 5 i15 14.3 103 90 (90) r,;u 365 i1120 see map 237 5 115 15~6 103 ':JO (':JO) NU 366 11/21 see 111ap 269 5 115 12.5 11)6 92 (90) SC 367 11121 . see 111ap 270 5 115 13.3 105 92 (90) SC 368 ll/21 see 11ap 238 5 115 17. 7 103 90 (90} NU 369 11/21 see aiap 260 5 115 Fl~4 103 90 (90) NU 370 11/.21 see 11ap 264 5 115 13.1 104 91 (9(1) NU 371 11/22 see t6ap 270 5 115 16,2 103 9() (90) f,;U .. 372 11/22 see 111ap 233 5 115 17.0• 103 90 (90) l\'U 373 11/22 see map 262 5 115 14.2 106 92 (90) ·sc 374 11/22 see·map .... 270 5 115 12;9 105 92 (90) NU 375 11/22· see map 194 5 115 11.9 105 92 (90) NU ~i ~3,. 376 11/22 see map 195 ·5 115 1'3.5 105 92 (9(1) SC 371. 11/22 · see map .264 5 us 12.5 . 1(14 91 (90) NU 378 ·n122 see ll'Jap. 197 ·5 115 13.9 104 91 (9(1} NU 379 111:~2 see r.ap 199· 5 115 ·12.9 l05 92 (9(J) NU 38Cr 11/27 see-map 265 5 1'"' 18.0 104 90 (90) SC l../ Jal 11/21 see raap 267 3 1n 15.9 102 90 {90) NU -~ 362 11/27 see 111ap· 201 3 113 i6,9 102 . 91 (90} SC 383 11/27 see. map 202 3 113 13.2 103 91 (90) t,Li 384 11/27 see map 203 3 113 12.8 102 90 (90} t~U 385 11/27 see map 268 3 113 13.5 i(,Z 91 (90) Nil 38B 1'1/27 see Map 205 3 113 14. 7 102 91 (90) NU 387 11/f:8 see w.a!I 206 5 !15 . !2. 7 104 9(1 (90) NU 388 11/28 .see map 208 s 1.15 .,,. r· 105 91 (90} SC .lb,v 389. 11/28 see-~taµ 26~ 4 116 14, Q 107 92 (90) SC 39(1 11./28. see map 270 4 116 lf;,4 105 92 (50) Nli 391 H/28 see i1a;1 210 j 113 12. 7 102 91 (90) NU 392 11i28· see ll!a.;; 211 5 HS 13.0 h17 93 (9(1) r-.'U 393 .11/28. see map 272 5 115 16.0 !05 92 ('30} NJ 394 H/29 ·see ·rai?,p 216 1 119· 14,l 108 91 (90} SC 395 11/29· see map 214 b 114 17.0 i04 91 (9(1) NU 39G tl/29-'SEI;? Ulo!J" 213 6 114 18. l 104 q? (90) Nu .,,. 397 11129-see man 273 3 113 '17.0 102 91 i9(1) NU ,. 398· l!/2S see mao 215 4 116 1C: t !(15 91 (SOi NtJ ,h.h.J 393 11/29' see ma;i 275 4 115 16.;9 105 91 (9(:) 5C Rernarka_};egend: HI#} = Reouired Percemt Cor,1pactiori, R-#1! = Retested c,n Test ##, Si:;=Sarid G:ir,e, N:J=Nudear, DC=Drive Cyl., 0T=Other -1 Projec~ Name: AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER, UNIT 2 TRBLE 2 Page# 11 Field, Density Test· Results E!evatior,. Curve No. Fill Fill Test · Test Test or & 11:aximum Nc,isti,re Dry Relat:1ve Number Date Le-cation pepth Dry Der,si ty CCt'!terrt D,msity Compact i c,r, Reraarks 1989 <feet) ipcfl (oercenti (pcfJ (percent) i:ee ie9er,itl --------------------,---------------------------- 4QO ll/29 ' see lli'ap 276 1 119· 14. 7 106 92 (9(1} . NU 4010 11/30 see map 217 3 113 15. 2 103 92 (9(:) SC 402 11/30 see tiaD 219 J 113 16.4 103 91 (g(;} NU -4(!3 11/30 see L1ap 220 3 113 15.3 103 91 i90) NU 404 11/30 230 3 .. ., ,~ . 103 qa;; (9(!) NU see r,ap .1.iu !~~ i .... 405 1'1/.JO see map 222 5 1"15 13.1 107 94 (90} NU 406 11/30 see map 225 3 11.3 15. 7 103 91 (90} SC 407 11/30 see map 2.27 3 HJ 13.5 104 9"2 (90) NU 40B . 11/22 see map ,30 ·5 ll.5 12.8 10'3 95 (90) NU '109 H/22 see. map 22£, 5 us 13 .. 4 111 '37 (90} NU -410 11/22 see map 232 r· 115 15.1 109 96 (90) NU ,J 41.1 11/22 see maµ 2,27 5 i1s 13.6 108 94 (90) NU 4i2 l?/04 see map 226 5 115 14.? 106 92 (90) NU 413.' 12/04 see map 224 5 ·115 -lj.9 104 90 (90) Nli 414,, 12/04 see /ilap 226 5 115 14 •. 0 1(18 94 (90) NU ·~ 415 12/01 _ see .111ap 22°3 5 115 12.·3 1(14 91 (90) NU ~~ 416 12/01 see t1ap 278 5 115 13.5 103 90 J90} NU 417 · 12/01 see map 230 5 115 13.0 103 90 (90} NU 41B 12/0! see map 232 5 1.15 12~j 106 93 (90)' NU 419 12/01 see .iap 234 5 115 12.(1 106 93 (90) NU 420 12/01 see map 235 5 115 13.5 104 91 (90) SC 421 i2Lll1 see map 236 5 115 14.0 105 92' (90) SC 4?2 12/01 see reap 2E6 5 .115 15.4 105--92 (90) NU 423 12/01. see maµ 229 5 115 13.5 104 91 (9(1} NU 424 12/01· see .map 239 r:_ 115 15.0 104 91 (90) NU ., 425-HYO! see man 230 5 115 !t9 105 91 (90} SC 426 12/01 see mao !.-~" t:: ll5 14.3 1c:s· 92 (90) SC 1..JJ .,.; 427 12/0.1 Ee2 rriap .243 5 115 15. (1 i05 91 (9(1) NU 428 1'2/tll " 238 t:: 1 't:: 15,2 104 91 (90) NU see map ,J l.J 4_29 !2/04 see mo:::i 244 5 115 15.7 105 92 (90) SC 43{1 12/04 see map 238 5 'l 15 14.9 1'(>4 91 (90) NU 431 121.04 see ,ma::, 239 5 115 13.7 104 91 (90) NU 4:32 12./04 see 11:aµ· 235 5 115 14.5 105 92 {90} NU 433 12/0'1 see rnap 230 5 115 15. 3 104 91 (90} ' NU 434 12/04 see maµ -c'34 5 115 15.2 105' en (90) SC .IL 435 !2/04 see-mao 240 5 !15 -16.1 104 91 (9(1) NU 43E, 1:2/05 see map · 263 '~ 115 13.2 105 92 i90} NU 437' 12/05 see v,ap 265 5 115 12.9 107 93 {90) NU 438 12/05 see ma;:i 241 5 115 15.3 104 9i (90) NU 439 12/05-see 111a~-267 5 115 1--r: 107 94 ('3(1) SC ~J.,J ·Remarks Le~end-: !#.#i = Required-Perced Corr.pacHc·n, R-f.# = Retested-cir1 Test #ll! SC=Sand Cc,ne, NU=Nuclear, DC=Drive Cyl., OT=Other. -l. J• ProJect Name: AIRi'.lORT BUSINESS -CENTER, u~m 2 TABLE 2· Pa~e ~ 12 Field Density iest ·Results · Elevat·wr, Curve f\C•, Fi1ll Fill Test Test Test eir &-Ma>1imur,1 Mo~sture Dry Re.lative Nurt!:11~r Date Locaticirs .f!epth Dry Der,s, t y Content C,er:s1ty Compaction Remarks l~89 (feet i · <pcfl {per-c-ent). (pcfi (percent} (see !egeno} --------------------------------------------------- 440 12/06 se~ map 265 r: 115 i3.3 107 93 (50) SG ..! -441 12/06 see kJap . 242 5 115 15. 7 !04 ·31 {9(1) NU 442 12/07 see n1ap 26'., C: • •'t:' 11. (I 105 92 ('30) NU .. .1 ,.,_c 443 12/06 see 111ap .234 5 ,,,= ;J,J 14.1 105 9E: (90) NU 44/t 12/06 see 1o1ap 232 C' ,J 115' 15.0 103 % ('30) Nl! 445 12/06 s~e map 229 5 115 14.6 j(l7 3:5 (~0) NU 446 12/08 see map 22i 5 115 12,'3 109 95 (9(1) NU 447 12/08 see map 229 5 11'5 13.5 .i(,8 '34 (%) N~ 448 12/08 see ·map 231 .,.. ns 1''1.4 105 Sc (90) Nii J 449 12/0B see· map 233 5 115 12.8 110 96 (90} NU .450 1210a see map 2·:.,. c-115' -1s.2 105 92 (90) NU -,.,! J 451 12/08 see map 236 5 ~15 14.8 104 '31 (90} NU 452 12/12 see 111ap 236 r: 115 . ., ~ l(IB 94 {90} t\'U J ..... b 453 12/12 see map 234 5 .4:: 13.9 107 93 (90) NLl ~i.J -454 12/12 ·see map ., 238 5 115 14.3 107 94 (9(1} NU 455 !2/13 see I!'.ap 236 :: 115 12. 4 1C>S 94 (90) NU -~ .: 456 12/!3 see lliap 240 5 115 12.7 1(13 90· (90} Nu 451 12/07 see maµ 252 5 115 14. 0 1(15, 92 (9(1} NU 't,58 f2/07 see 111ap 2-48 r l 15 13,7 -105 92 (9(1) NU ., 459 12/13, see map Z86 5 115 ns 105 91 {9(1) SC 46(! 12/~3 see aiap 276 c-115 lit~ 6 107 94 (9(1} SC J 4E.l 12/13 Sej?, !tap 276 5 115 15. 9 1c,5 Q:l (90) SC J>- 462' 12/1li see Mao 236 5 115 16.2 105 92 (9(1} SC 463 12/14 see map 240 ::: :15 i ~ -!ll5 Q~ 1i:ii·,·, SC .,,J, J J .. ,._v, 464 1212ci see 11ap 236 c-115 12.'8 11)5 9E (90i NLl ., -465 12/2(1 see mao 242 5 115 12.6 104 91 !9(1i NU 466 12/20 see map 244 5 115 l" c-107 94 (9(1}° NL! .C.rJ ~&7 ;2i2(~ see ma~· 246 5 ,,c-1~.2 10:: 92 'Ql'' ~iU :.~ .. · l ~-.•; 466 1B/2i see map 227 ~ 115 17.9 99 87 i90) 469 NU 469 12/2;. see ma!> F:27 5 11:, 14. 6 li)5 51 (90) NU 47() 12/21 see map 229 5 115 1-<t •. 4 104 g(, (90) N:! 47.1 12i22 s1:e map. 271 .-. 111 r&.s !Ov ?1. (SO} NL: ,.l 472 12/22 i:ee map 25B 13 !ll ~o .. s 98 89 i90} NU 473 12/22 sQ-ina::> 25"3 i3 :.11 17.e lOi 52 150) l\"U -c 474 1Ei2c Sl:!e l!lap 2&3 12-l1l ~-, 98 69 ('90) NU c~. ~ 475 12/22 see ma;:i ::69 C: 115 14.6 108 '35 (90) NJ ~· 476 12122· 281 13 ~11 21.4 105 9c-(50} NU see. rnao-.., '' 477 12/22 see ~i.;p 258 . ~ !11 19.6 104 94 (9(,) N!.! .~ 4,n i2.114 see map 274 C' -115 16. 7 104 51 (9(lj SC ,c ,! 4:G 12!"14 !l!:e mao 260 C t '= •-:' ~ 104 ,:;.1 (9(;i s:: ' -,J ,,:,1,_r hi,..) J. ·RemarksLeqend: . (##i· = Required Percerrt Compaction, R-# = Ret;;;sted ~·(! Test illli 5C=Sar1d. Ceir1e, -NU=Nuc}ear, DC=Drive r·\; -·/u ! GT=Dther •:. !- PfC•JECt oie:::e: P.!riPDit': -. ,!'"l"t:'--~-CE!-~iErc! Ut\IT 2 .:iur.,a,\i:i:•i: r;~L~ .:; Page if i.3 Field Der,si.ty Test Results £1 ev at i c-r1 Gurve Ne,. Fi 11. Fi 1l 1e~t Te~t Te!:! c,r [. Maiiir~1u1P. MO'isture Dry Re!~.-r;ive NuJilbEr Date :....:,cat ior, D~;:!th Dry De~)Sl ty , Cqr,t~r,t Demiity f:eit1pact i c,r, Remarks iSBS' (feet) ,(pcf} (petc1mti ipcfl J •• ,.percer1~1 (see leQer1dl -------~-------------" ------------------, ___ ---------------- 480 !2/!4 !::Ee .-:a~ 240 5 115 14. 7 l(l4 91" (90) Nu 48! 12i 1~ :...-:t-:ot ic·r: ~r;aval le.bl~ 2f:2 5 !1~ lD. 7 105 '32 i90} SC 4i32 12il'5 S!?E r.e~ C5ti r ,J Il5 i6.2" .103 50 (90) NU 483 .i2i15' se? ·r;~c~ 23(i 5 ft;:" 16.E !(i4 91 (90) SG .11.J -4ii4 12/!: see ~~; 282 5 115 15. 0 104· '31 ('30) NU -485 lf_:i25 see f!l2:l 283 4 116 17.S 1u5 91 (90) SC 486 12/26 see 1na;:i 284 f, 114 18. 3 1(;4 92 (90) Nu 4a1 1;;120 see map 270 13 111 19.i 102 92 !90) NU 468. 12/26 see tla!) 273 4 116 19.5 105' 91 (90} NU 489 12/27 see Al-n c,-278 6 Wt 18.3 103 91 (90) SC 490 12/27 see i::a;; E'SO 6 114 17,6 103 9:i. (90) NU 491 f2/27 see ;1:a~ .23,; 13 111 19.1 102 q--~ (90) NU -492' 12127 ·5EE 11:ap e54 6 114 14.7 1(15 92 (90) SC 493 12/27 see maµ 256 f, 114 13.6 103 9! (90) NU 494 12/27 see map 2~ 6 114 ,15.3 104 92 i90) NU 495 12/28 S!:E ~i2;i 295 6 1-14 15, 0 104 92 !90) SC ~; 4% 12/26 288 13 111 17. l · 102 9·-, (90) N't.J ;( see ~:ap .::. t.97 1~/28 see nra~ 285 13 111 .16.5, 105 G"' _.., (90) NU 498 12/28 see Eii!:l c.'98 13 111 17~ 4 1(12 92 _(90} NU 499 12'/2ii 52:! r:1i:;; 23'3 6 114 17.9 !03 '30 {'30) NU 500 12/29 se~ t:a;: 297 6 114 15. 3 Wt 91 (90) SC 50t 12/i:'3 See 1ri:~ 260 6 114 15.7 103. SJ (90) NU :02 12/29 see rr:c.p 262 .-. ~~ 111 l8.'3 102 93 (90} SC 5(13 1212s SE~ me~ 254 6 114 15. 6 1(1.lJ. . , . 91 (90) r~ll. ·504. 12/25 see hid~ 263 6 114 15.6 104 92 (9(1J NU ~05 12/29 ?ee ll?a~ 264 6 l14 .15. l 103 91 i90) NU 1990 · 5(16 01/03 SE:E' J::a~ 289 13 111 IB:3 !()j' 94 (90i SC 507 (i!/03 SEE !JC:~ 26!:i 13 111 18. 7 102 92 (90) NU 503 01/(i] :ee !.i2:· 2&8 13 111 19 .. 1 !(12 q,· _.., (9(!} NU 509 01/03 5"" !!iQ;i 266 13 11! 17,6 102 JJ::, ('3(1) NU ., ... ~10 01/(JJ see in~n 267 13 H! 18·.9 101 92 i90) NU 5~1 01/04 see ~.li?ai 2'39 13 111 17.2 102 Q7 .,., (90} Nl! 512 01/04 se& ma~ 300 5 115 16.9 1.05 92 (9~1) SC .,..~ .J.!.~ Ol/04. see !!;a~ . 301 1'3 111 1.7.9 101 92 {9(1) SC 514 01/04 ~Ee mao 293 13 111 18.5 103 93 (90) NU 515 Ql/04 !:ee· Iliap 302 13 111 18.3 lD,~ 93 {'30} Nll 516 Ol/(:4 se~ r,~:E;t 30!. jj 111 13.0 ~00 91 (~(lj NU ~!7 Oi/05 se: r:-.-a::: 2'3'} 5 115 ii.a 1(14 91 . !90) Ni.! 518 01/05 SEE, :::::.~ 3()0 5 115 18.2 !(:3 90 (90} SC 8il!!1rH1 LeQ,.nQJ. (#Ji) = ~equired Percsrit, Compac-ti c,r,, a-#'1 = Retested ori Test ii#, sc;::sano Cc,r,1?, NU=Nuclear, DC=Drive Cyl. ~ OT=Ot:-ier \ l ~ -t"' ., ~ro~ec Narr.e: h!RPURT Bi.JS!NESS [E!~TER, ur.n 2 TABLE 2 Page¥. 14 Field Density Test Results ~l ev at i c:ir! Curve Ne,. Fill· Fili Te:\ Test· Test er & Maximum Moisture Dr-y Relative ~l.lt,i!:ier Date ;_c,cai: ic,n .D~;;.h Dry Der,sity Content Derisity Cc,mpadion Remarks 19~0 ,i;,fEet·J (;;cfl {oercentl (pcfl (percer,t) (see leger,d) ------------------· __ , _____ ---------------- r•q i.11105-see u;ap 3(:3 c-1!5 16. 6 106 92. (90) 5-C ..,J_ ,J 520 i)li05 see m.:o 301: 1-_J !11 1-5. 5 102 Q'.) J'-, {90) NU s2-~ 01/05 see -mai:; ~(~~ !-!• 111 20,0 102 52 (90) NJ 5-,-::,'' '01i05 Sl:E t1a;, 3(:6 13 1•1 18,9' 102 92 (9(>) NU '-"' ... :;23 (lli05 See i1iap 303" 6 114 17.9 -104 92 (90} 5,: 524 0+/08 see JBap 3CU 6 11'4 16.7 103 91 (90) SC 52.5 01/08 see i:;ap 302 6 114 17,5 103 90 (90) SC 526 01/0B SE!:? 11!ap 3(>0 6 114 16. 7 103 90 (90) NV ,52.7 01/08 . see 11ap 307 5 115 16. 0 104 9(1 (9(1} NU 528 01108 .see .map. 3Q3-"' ., 115 15.-4 108 95 (90) NU 523 01108 see map 302 5 115 16.5 105 92 (90} SC 530 01i09 see map · 304 s::· 115 15.8 105 92 (9(1) SC ;;J ,531 01/0.9 see -map 303 5 115 15.9 104 91 (90) SC 532 01/0'3 see a1ap 308 5 1-15 15.8 106 93 (9(1) NU 533 01/09 SI* !Gap 309 5 115-14.0 104 91 (90) NU ~~4 01/09 see map 307 r:-115 15.·8 105 s~ (90) NU ~ ,., ... 535 01/09 see 11ap 309 r:-115 16 .• 9 104 91 (90) NU ,J 535 01/tis see map 308 5 115 18. 0 103 90 . !90) NU .537 01/09 SEE map 304 5 1'15 16.7 104 .9_1 (90) NU 538 01/09 see reap 3(15 :: .J 115 17.3 1(>5 92 (90) NU 539 ... 01/-10 !iee ~ap 411 5, 115 18.1 104 91 (90) SC 540 0}/10 see map 310 •,: !15 13. 1 103 90 (9(1) -NU ,J 541 01/10 see l!aP 305 5 115 i4.0. 103 90 (90) NU 542 01-/lO_ see llii!p j(;9 6 114 13.1 103 91 l90j NU 543, 0.1/10 · see 11ap 313 5 1)5 1-:3.l 103 90 (9(1) Ni.J ,, 544 01110 see map 305 5 115· 12.1 104 91 (90) NU 545 01/10 see map 307 5 115 13.5 103 90 (90) SC 54~ (11./11 see ~1ap 3()8 5 115 14,2 10!) 91 (90) SC 547 01/11 see r.ap 307 c-115 15.1 104 91 (90) SC ,J 54"8 01/11 see map 248 6 11-'I 16. 7 103 91 (90} NU 549 . 01/il see map 240 5 115 17.8 106 9c (90) SC 560· 01/11 see Map 309 5 i!S 15.1 108 94 (90) SC 551 Ol/11 see Map 257 13 111 16.7 103 93 (90) NU 5c--:;,· . 01'/11 ~ee map 254 13 111', 16.1 102 92 (90) NlJ ~· ... 55-3 Ol/11 see 11ap 256 13 ill 17.7 102 92. (90) NU 554 01/-11 see map 3J3 5 115 14.2 106 92 190) NU 555 01/12 see sap· 3H 4 116 16.3 106 92 (90) SC 556 ·c,1112 see map jOB 4 116. 17.3 105 91 (90) SC 557 01/12 see rnap 711:' 4 116 16.1 107 92 (90) NU W.J..J 558 01/12 see rnap j(lfi' 13 111 17.9 102 92 (90) NU ·; -Remar.ks Legend: !ii#) = Required Percent Cornpacti,c,r,, !Hi# = Ri:test-ed .c,r, Test #lli SC=Sar,d Ceor,e, NU=Nuclear1 DC=Dri-ve Cvl,1 OT=fJther PteJec:t Nmne: AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER! UNIT 2 TABLE 2 Page# 15 Fitld Density Test Results Elevation Curve Ne.,. Fill Fill Test Te!:t Test er & Maxirnwa Moisture Dry Relative Nu.mber Date Loc:atior, Depth Dl"y Der,sity Cc,r,t-er,t · -Density Compact iorr Remarks 1990 (feet) (pcfl (percent> Cpcfl (percent) (see legeru:I) ----:------- 559 01/12 see sap 258 13 1-11 1,5. 7 102 92 (90) NU 5!;0 01/1~ see r.,ap 256 13 111 16.1 102 '32 (90} NU 561 01/12 see map. 259 13 Hl 15.1 101 92 (90) NU 552 01/12 see rnap 309 6 114 17.2 104 91 (90) NU 563 (11/12 s~e map 311 6 114 16. 0 104 92 (90) NU 554 01/12 see il:ap 31(J 6 114 17.8 : 104 92 (90) SC ~65 01/22 see i,~p 262 13 111 18.5 100 91-(90) N'J $6 01122 see map 256 13 111 17.6 101 91 (90) NU 567 01/22 see 14ap 259 13 111 16.4 1'01 92 (90) NU 568 01/f.'2 see liap 259 j3 111 17.7 102 92 (90} SC 569 01/23 SEE.MAP 261 3 113 17.1 102 91 (90} NU 'ST(} (>1/23 SEE l".AP 264 3 113 18.7 103 ~1 (~0) NU 571 01/23 SE£ NAP 263 13· lH 19~5 101· 91 (90) NU 572 '01/23 SEE NAP 266 3 113 17.0 104 9"2 (90) NU 573 Oi/23 $EE MflP 2.67 13 111 17. 9 -103 93 (90) N1J 574 01/23 S-i:E MAP 266 13 111 18~ 1 101 92 {90} SC ~ 575. 01/23 St£ "!AP 269 13 111 19.1 103 93 (90} SC 576. . 01/23 ,sr:r: MAil 268 13 111 18.0 101 92 (90) NU 577 01/23 SEE MAP 269 13 Hl 19.5 99 90 (90) NU 578 01/23 S.EE MP.P 271 13 .111 18.4 100 90 {9(1) NU 5i9 01-/23 S!:£ !ll.'iP 272 13 111 19.3 1(10-91 (90} Nl! 580 01/23 SEl; MAP 273 13 !11 19.5 100 91 (90) SC 5Bl (i~/23 SEE JliAP 275 13 111 1r -:, ~03 S3 {'30} NU "· .. 582 0112::. SEE MP.P. 277 13 !11 !7.9 102 92 (9(1) N~ 583 · 0{123 SEE 11:AP 27'3 6 ;14 17.5 104 92 (90) f:ir ~"" 584 01/23 SEE /1'..AP 281 6 11-4 15.& 194 92 {'30) NU 585 01124 SEE r.m, 2&0 13 Ul 17.8 1.0? 93 (91)} SC 585 (:{/24 SEE ~AP 252 & 1'!4, •4 -:, !04 91 (90) !{J ... ~• I- 5S7 01/24 Si:£ ~P.P c·ss 111 15. 7 102 93 tS(J) ~,'.L~ 588 01/2.1/ SEE J!i.qfl· zas 13 llJ 18.4 101 ~2 (90) ~-· ,l,} C:AQ 01/24 SEE MAO 2.% • 7 ll.1 17.S 102 Q·j {~l)j a:: ~--~., , .. :,_ 590 01/24 SEE MAP 284 13 n1. 16.1 · 102 s~ ' ,L,;., i90) N!.3 t:'nt, 01i24 SEE 1:\A:l 266 13 ~11 16.7 101 91 {'?0) I\.'' J~, 592 01/24 SEE MAP 284 13 •• f 17.5 102 92 ('30} t'·· J.J..l "i .. ~ 593 (:,:/24 SE;E XAP 288 13 1q l8,·5 102 92 (90} s: 594 01/25, SEE MAP 285 · 13 '!11 :18.3 101 Q~ (90) NU •"- 5'35 01/25 SEE MAP 28'3 4 !Hi 15.6 107 93 (91)) r:-;J., 5% 01/25 SEE /!IP.P. 288 4 116 '17.4 104 90 (90} ~-1. i,U 597ij (!1/25 SE£ .. MPi? 21& ~ 1' ~, 1-S.4 1(12 '3) {91)) ,-,-.. , ...... .:·!.. 598 01/Z5 SEE ii.AP--27B .,; 1!5 !7.7 105 52 {·31:,1 /li,J R~mark~ L!:gend-1 {##) = Requ1red Percer,t Cc,mpactiorr, R-#ii = Ret!lste'J c:n Test fii;~ S:::=Sand Cor,e, NLI=N11clear ! [JC=Drive Cyl. 1 l!T=C·tl-:er .1 Prc•JEC~ N;;.r.e: ij!RPORT B~SINESS C8{TER, ~NIT~ TABLE 2 Page# 16 Field Density Test Results Elevat.ic,n Curve No. Fiil i:·11 . l,. ;es~ iest Test -c,r & tiia~:imur,1 Moisture Dry Relative Number Dat~ Le-cation Depth Dry Density Cc,nt,mt Density Compaction Rer,1arks 1990 (feet) lpcf) (perci:nt) (pcfl ( pei•cer,t l !see ieger.d) ---.!..---------------------599 01/25 SEE MAP 28(1 6 11'¼ 19. S 104 9! (90} NiJ 6C:0 01/25 SEE MAP 280 6 114 !8. (: 105 92 (90) ,111 i"!J 60! 0:125 SEE ff:AP c:7g ,6 114 17.3 105 92 (90i •=-. :,..; 602 01/25 SEE ~p 281 6 1'14 19.7 J(l4 92 (90i N;J 603 01/25 SEE MAP 311 6 1T4 ,17.1 104 v·:: -'-!90} \i] 504 01/26 SEE MAP 283 3 113 15.0 103 92 (9(1) SC 605 01/26 SEE /!!AP 28,4 3 113 16. 7 11)0 89 (9(1) 606 NU 665 01/26 SEE .MAP 284 3 113 15.9 102 91 (90) t.1J 607 1)1/26 SEE NAP 313 3 113 14. 7 104 93 (90) NU 608 0l/26,, SEE MAP 286 3 113 17.4 103 92 (9(1) NU 6(19 01/26 SEE MAP 289 ; ... 113 17.9 103 92 (90) SC 610 (11/26 · SEE MAP 2BB 3 113, 16 •. 9 103 91 (90) NU 611 01126 SEE MAP 265 3 113 16.5 105 94 (90) NU 612 01126 SEE MAP 279 3 113 17.1 1(12 91 (90) Nu 6U 01i?6 SEE fl'iAP ,· 260 3 113 16.5 103. 92 (90) SC 614 .01/29 SEE MAP. 250 5 115 14.5 l07 93 (90) NU , 615 . 01/29,. SEE MAP. 263 :i 11j 16.5 102 9Q (90) N!J 615 01i29 SEE.MAP 280 3 113 16.1 1(13. 91 (9(1} NU 617 01/29 SEE MAP 273 5. ,<C' U..J 18. 7 104 91 (90} SC 618 01/29 · SEE l".AP 311 6 114 17.5 103 91 (90) SC 619 01/29 SEE NAP 312 6 11'4: 16.'2 103 91 (90) N~I 620 (11/29 SEE MAP 31·:; •'-13 111 17.B 102 93 !90) NtJ 6?1 01/~0 SE~ MAP ~10 r: 1i5 1r r:, 104 91 (9l)i sr J J,., 922 (l!/30 SEE MA? 31! r: l!5 15.5 1()6 92 (9(1} NLi ,.J 62.3 01/30 SE.E KAP J13 5 115 16,3 1(14 90 ('30i NG 624 01/30 SEE MAP 312 ,5 115 17.0 105 92 {90) NU 5·:,r (11/J(l SEE MAP 311 t 1-15 15.4 103 90 (50) t,J;.! -,...i ., b26, 0.1/3(> SEE !".AP 311 -s 1~5 15. 3 !(Ii, ~() \90) r--u 527 01130 SEE MAP 311, ,: 115 16 .. ~-104 91 !SOi ,-.~ J ;:iL 628 02/01 SEE MAP 295 13 ,.,, 1B.5 102 92 (9(;) SC !J..I 629 02/0l SEE MF;P 294 13 j_11 iS.2 102 92 {90j r~J 630 02/0.1: SEE 1'4.AP 297 13 111 16.4 102 92 (90) Ni' ! ,... 531 (li?/01 SEE ~AP 2'35 13 111 18.5 101 '32 (50) N'' " 632 1)2/0! SE i"IP.J: 292 3 !13 17. b t ---~-:, .\.11.. 9~1 {9(1) NU 633 02/(11 SEE J!!fiP 293 3 '1-· ... ~ 18.0 102 91 (9(:j N:.J 5,A 02/01 StE J!'iAP :;qr ~ '. ~ 17. 0 104 92 i9{1) !,;[j "· ..,._~ u.l 635 '(12/0'1 SEE MAP 2S5 ., , 1~ 18. r :ci3 92 (90) SC ' ., •• .l 635 02/01 SEE ff:AP 297 7 l' 'l' 17.9 1(12' '31 (50) ,,:1 .., ·"' "- .5::,7 02i03 SEE MAP 248 C: ~ (C 14, (I 105 92 !9(1) ft/J ,., ,;J~ ,v_. 63i3 02103 SEE M.:iP 255 5 1!5 •A:.-fOS 94 !'3(:} t,'i• ...... , ,,w Rerilarks Legend: i##J = Required P2rcer1t Cor,1p.;ctie<n1 lH# = Re-t-ested· cri'; Test *'Fi SC=Sand C,:,ne, NU=Nudear 1 DC=-Drivc-Cyl,, GT=Other Pt~OjEC:t ~~ue: IURPORT BUSINESS CE~'TER, UNIT 2 TABLE 2 Page i 17 Field Density Test Results .... . . i:.:eva,~or, Curve t~,. Fill Fill Test Test Test or & Ma;.!ir,1u!r. Mci'isture Dry Relative Number Date Locatior, D~pt!'l Dry D2r,sity Content Derisity Cm,1p2r:t i c-r, Remari<: 199(1 (feetl' iocf) (percer,ti (pcfl (percent) {see legenGJ. ----------------------------------63S 02/05 SEE Ji:AP 267 3 ,i ;3 16. 5 102 91 (90) NU 640 02/(15 SEE MAP 267 7 ., • 1-l.J 15.6 103 91 (90) NU fitt,l (!2/05 SEE Jl!.AP 268 r 11'5 14. 5 105 52 (90i Jr,.IJ ... :\..; 54:-> 02/05 SEE MAP 28'3 5 115 18.0 1(14 91 (90) N'I . u 543 02/05 SEE MAP 269 r 115 14.6 105 91 (90} NJ ,., 644 02/05 SEE MAP 29,0 5 • n: 18.2 104 91 (90) SC >l..J 6!.C: 02/06 SEE ~RP 26& 3 113 15.4 103 92 (9(1) ~,:. ,.J ,:.i 645 02/06 SEE /'!AP C:71 3 11-1' "'/' 104 9'2 (90) NU __ J ::;,. , 647 02/06 SEE MAP 292 3 1131 16.0 ro3 91 (90} NU 648 (>2/(16. SEE MAP 272 3 . ,-1~-5 104 93 (90) NU hJ ~¥3· 0.2/(rf:, S;E KAP 2i4 3 !13 · 18.0 102 90 (90} NU 650 02/~ SEE MAP 278 b 114 !S.9 104 92 ( '3(l) :JU -~51 02/06 SEE .(II.AP 272 6 114 18.1 104 92 (90} NU 652 02/05 SEE MAP 294 6 114 18.0 105 94. (9(1) s·-· -t- 653 02/06 SEE MAP ,, 274 3 113 1~.3 102 91 (90) r-.u 654 (12/(16 SEE MAP 272 3 !13 •" t:: 102 91 (90} ~u ~-..:.b .... • 655 02/07, SEE MAP 277 4 !16 17.0 1'(17 93 (90) SC 6~6 (~2/07 SEE JII.AP· 264 4 '1. •• b 17.5 107 93 (90) NU 557 02/07 SEE .MAI? 268 ~ f'!., 18.3 103, 91 (90} !•,j:! ...... 6;i8 02,/(17 SEE MAP 280 3 1:i~-i9.5 103 o• !90} l'( .. ! .,. 659 02/1)7 SEE MAP 281 3 ',-15. S 104 92 (90) SC· ; .~ 600 ('2./07 · SEE MAP 2% 4 116'· 1.7.1 106 92 (90) NJ 651 02/c)7 SEE MAP 274 3 :~3 tB,9 11}4 92 (90) ~· i -· i35,:, 0.:./0i SEE· MA,) 276 ~13 · 10 C 103 91 (·3;)) N'' ,_ -•,:.1.1a'.J .u 663 · 02/07 SEE /r:AP 263 ., lt~ 15.2 ·103 .o--, (90) !'I" ~ .,c, . 664 02/07 SEE MAJ:? 27'3 3 ~!'! ,r r ;J,b l04 · 92 (9(1) SC 655 02/08 SEE MAP· 265 3 1:3 : }7. 7 i.O~. 94 (90} r'" i.i 655 C:?/08 S;:E 1"iqp 254 . il} ::.4 103 92 {90i SC 6Sr 02/08 SEE P!AP 2% 12 li: ,-. l(i~ 91 (90) NJ ,6 ,. ~ &68 (12/08 SE~ MAP 300 13 111 1:: J;. '!01 91 (90} NU -·. 669 02/08 ·SE MAP E67 :: '•I:' ~-t:' ' 104 q• ('3(1j s: -..! ;.;..,. .. .., ..... ., 67(1 02/08, SEE /If.AP 281 5 1'15 1r::., 106 92 (90) N!J :..J.~ 671 02iOB SEE.MAP 2SS 5 , .. z:-'4~ -10.<i Si (91)) !1/'l J..1~ !:~·-~ . ~ 572 02/08 SEE; !".Ai1 281 C: ::5 16. (I 105 ':l2 (9(1} !O::_j .., 673 02/(;6. SEE MAP f:79 :: •tr' 14 .. S !07 94 (90} c•r ., .:.;.,.: WW ·-1.. (12/08 Si:E l'lAP· 271 5 ~.!S f ~ •j 104 91 (90) ;\!U Of. JO .... ·-t 02/08, S!:E fl!P.P 286 ~1~ 17.,2 105 92 (90) ~- . bl.J :, .:,~ 6i5 02/0'!-SEE NA~ 27::. ::: . ,-JC". 104 91 i90) NU Jt.!~ J..J-.J. ·,-02/09 ~Et -~tA::. E87 -. ii: ,·-; c-:05 tj•j (90) 'd: t, r, ,_, • ( ,,J .,,_ ,,_ 678 O~i,)S S::E' ;t;HP 2.s-; -: ~5 1;.s 106 92 C,OJ s: Bell!arks L1?.ger1d_r {j;,;) = REe;uireo Percent Corn!lacti,:,r:! R..,# = Ret-estec· t;•r: Tes~ :rr! 'SC=S,ar~d Cori~, NlJ=/.Juc!ear, DC=Drive C}'!,, OT=Other ' ':i Pt~3ect Name: A'IRPGRT B'JSH4ESS CENTER, .uNrr 2 .. THE:..E 2 h'a;e ; 18 Fitld Density Test Result& Elev.at ion CL.rve Ne,. Fill i;:·q . l •• Test. 'rest Test or & /!iaiiimurr. Ir.cdsture Dry Reiative l'iusber ilate Locatfon Depth Dry ilc-··sity Sof?t.ent Der,s1ty Compactic,n Remarks !'9?0 ifee-tl (pcf) (percer,t) (pe:fi (percerrti (see ieQer,di ------------------------579 02/09 SEE MAP 302 ,: 115 14.3 H14 9i (9t)} NU ., 58(1 02/09 SEE MAP 282 5 1!5 1~.a 104 q, -· {9(>) N" u 68! 02/(!3 SEE i1A~' 288 5 f(C'' lJ.'-1 16.t 100 87 (90} £82 N'.: 682 (12/(t;J SEE MAP 288 5 115 16.2 105 92 i90} NU 683 02/12 SEE ~lAP 244 5 115 15.6 1011 91 (90) ~,.. :J1., 684 02/12 SEE !".AP 'r!.47 5 1t5 17. 7 103 9(1 (90) NU 685 02/12 SEE ll'iAP 252 5 1 • c-!.J 15.~· 106 92 i90) NJ 686 (12/12 SE£ MAP 241 5 115 16.8 104 91 (90> NU 687 02/12 SEE l'!AP · 243 3 113 . 17 •. 9 102 91 (90) SC 688 02/13 SEE MAP 254-3 113 16.7 103-91 ('30) NU 689 02/13 SEE· Ji'.AP 251 5 115 14.3 104 91 (90} NL/ 690 02/13 SEE MAP 251 5 115 15.6 105 91 (90) SC 691. ,02/13 · SEE fl!AP 248 5 q5, 15.0 104 91. (90) NU 692 02113 SEE MAP. 247 3 113 16.3 103 9"2 (90) NU 6~3 02/13 SEE MAP 31)3 5 115 16.9 104 90 (90} SC 694 02/13 SEE l"JlP 243 5 115 1·5.2 104 91 (9(1} NU lt ,. 695 02/14 SEE l!IAP 247 6 114 i7.0 104 91 (90) NU 696 02/ 14 SEE "ffiAP 305 6 114 17.2, !04 91 (90) SC 697 02/14 SEE MP.P 248 6 114 16,3 104 92 • (9(1) tf;J 69B 02/14 SEE MAP· 251 6 114 16.1 103 91 (90) NU 699 02/14 .SEE r.AP 256 6 114 16.7 104 . 91 (90) N'' ~ 100· O'f./14 SEE. !"sAP 252 6 !14 1'5 • .7 106 93 (9(1} NU 701 (12/14 SEE ,"iP.P 244 6 114 17.1 1(15 52 (9(:) SC 702 02/.!5-c:--fl:AP 247 6 1:14 l?,9 1(;4 r-,:, (9(>} N" ... t:.C j1. .., 70'3 . 02I15 .!:EE KAP 250 7 118 16. S 1(;& 92 (9(1) NiJ 704 (12/15 SEE MAP 251 7 H8 15.1 108 ·32 (9(1) NU 705 (12/15 SE£ !r';P.P 255 5 115 16.7 104 91 (90) NU 70b (:2/15, SEE MAP 2,554 ? 115 17.b 104 'jl (9(1} NU 707 02/15 SEE ,r,AP 255 5 115 1€-, 2 105 91' (%) r-:;n ,, ... L. 70B 02/15 SEE MAP ~58 3 113 17 •. i !02 91 (90i SC 709 c··,,."" SEE ~!AP 260· ~ 113 15, 8 103 91 (90) SC IC/ i&J J 710 02/21 SE£ 11:AP 262 3 113 18.9 102 91 (90} NU 711 02/2! SEE MAP 261 3 113 I9,·5 102 91 (9(1} N'' L• 712 (12i21 Sf:E !';AP 2f.4 3 113 18.7 ~C:. 50 (9(1} 713 NU 7!'~ o·:-,0'1 SEc ~iAP 256 3 l 13 \9.5 Ia)2 ·91 (90) NU .J ._,~ .. 714 (12/21 SEE MAP 268 3 1"1' ~.1, .... 16.J 1(13 . 92 (9(>) NU 715 (11/21 SEE MAP 270 3 113 17.9 103 91 (90) SC r!S. (:2/2l SEE MAP 272 5 1' c-16.3 •. ,. C: 92 (9(1} SC • .J _.tJ-.1 717 02/22 SEE P:/.1;; 222 c· o.J .. 115 16. 7 105 ,,~. :-i: (90) t"' ,u 71:9 1J2/22 , SEE MHP 229 5 -p:; .1 .... , 17 •. B· !07 94 (90i NU i Beil!arl<s Leger,d: -mn = Reouired .Per:::errt C.:.r~paction, R-## = Retestetl cir: Test ·-!!i:, SC=Sa:-,d Cor!~, NU=Nuclear! DC==Drive Cy1.1 QT=Dtner . -.. Ptoject,.!\'l:ime: AIRPORT BU$INE$S CENTER~ UNIT 2 · Test Test Number Date 19'31) 719 02122 720 . 02/22 .721 02/22 72~ 02/2?. 7'2.3 02/23 Test Locatior1 SEE l"iAP SEE MAP SEE MAP SE~ P',.AP SEE MAP 724 02/23 SEE Mf!P 725 02/23 · SEE 'MAP 726 02/23 •S~ !'!AP 727 02/23 · SEE KAP 728 02/23 SEE· MP . Elev·ati@ c,r ~epth (feet! 305 223- 228 228 2'Jl 257 259 260 261- 729 02/23 S~ AAP 262 730 02./24 .. SEE MAP 279 ·1Ji. 02/24· .. ::_SE(MP •. ·. =·.,. _. • 275 ·732 02/24 ."··.·SEE HAP.. . , . . , 315 ?33_ ... : __ -~:~;2,\/:S~}~:.·:;;t.J:t~·-_ _...:.:··._i ··,-262 734 .-.. 02/26'-)SEE·NAP.·: ·,.:;;;-, ·. . 264--,.e_.··: . •. ··\ "·.t .. , •.. ·· .• ·.:.;-·:·~::.::::: .•. : . 7,jJ _.,, .02/26: ·'> SEE.:JIIAP .. : ,.,··-~:-: .... · . 266 ·· · ... 736 -.. ·. oelzi/':-.;sa{MAP .. ;''.·:,-,?\:-·'·. -._ .. · · .. 261 131 · ·-02126 :l"s&(MAP_.·:--·:.:: :> .. .-._ · ·.· ·· 262 · na · 02125-:_:fsEE"-'.ii!ilP-. _;:_-_: ~=-·., ·.::: 254 . '· . :__ ·;-.':·:<.-_'.,;; <·/\· . -.:·.-_.·i:-;: ':~·,, , .. ·739 :-02/26;' :-SEE'MAP""" · ':./ ... ,. · · 266' 1w,-;:·.~121(.:·(s~),~i>-~ .:: ·--,::::· _·-.· .. · · : . 268 . 741 · .. 02/26 ·:.stt· MAP,:·. ··:' :-:· . · ·_-· . 270 742 . -ozdt:··:;::sEE·,lMAP·::::_-./-'<-..... · · · '.· : 2i2. · ·743 -.:_ 0212r/::sefMAP::t\/·;·>·.:' .. :\ ·:' ·.. · 268 . . . 744 745 746 747 748 . ·, ~·:-.1.: ~· ... ~: .. :, ...... . 02.12.1 · .. ·. ·sEE MAP··· (12/27· · SEE. MAP- 02/27 SEE MAP 02/27 . SE~ J!!AP 02/27 SEE MAP 749 02/27 SEE MAP 750 02/27 , · SEE MAP . 751 02/27" S~E MAP 75i?. 0'2./21 SEE NAP 753" ,?2/27· . ___ s~·MAP 754. 02./27 SEE MAP .. 755 02/27-SEE MA~ 75~ CJc/28, SEE ·MAP 757 . ·02/28 SEE. MAP' 751 02/28 SEE 'MAP 270 268 272 .. 274 272 276 278 280 282 284 28£ 274 276 278 281 TABLE c Page# 19 .Field Density Test Results Curve Ne,~ f'i.11 Fill & °/ila:~iW.lhl Mc,is'ture Dry Relative !Jry Der1sity Coriter,t D!msity Compaction Reraarks (pcf) iµercer1tl {pcf}. iper·cer1t} (see leger,d} -------6 6 6 1'3 6 6 4 4 4 4 3 5 .6 ·6. 114 18.4. 1(13 114 15,2 · 103 · 1.14 16. 4 103 111 ti~-6' 102 1-14 17. 4 103 114 18.-S-·103 ·116 1'3.5 107 116. 17~5 107 116 · 16.3 106 116 ,16.5 105 91 90 91 92 91 91 92 93 S-2 -91 i90} NiJ ('30} NU (90} NU ('30} SC (90} NU (90). NU (91)) SC (90>" NU (90} NU . (90} NU 116 17.7 107, 93 f90_} SC 115 16.1' 105 -· . .-91 ·. -!~Of· . Ntr· 116 16.5 : .: .'··106, · · · ... .-.. 91 ·. · (90J--.-... '· .-:. SC 116 ·1s •. 1 ··" .. --1os,./..· .. · ... ,-91 .. '. ,so>'-.-·· st 113 · ... -SC . •//._ 115 · ,.·. j15 · .. 114'• .· . 4 6 4· -6 116 ,, -18~Q\:'i 1,1.,t:...;105;;/r,-_;·.:'.':---.. 91,, ·.,. ',(90)··.-., · · .... SC , :·'"·, -: , 114°. . 1s;(-:i._\':· ... '.104?:1·.'·:!:: \,~:· 9L' '· .. (9cij'·.'.. ·:.·.:.NU ·.i . 4· 6. 6 4 4 4 4 .5 C' .., 6 6 4 4 4 4 3 . . ·t-'· . -·.,\. . .... · . --. . . . .. . ' . .. . . 116 10"1·' .. ·' ·, ..... P61·'-~-'-'·-.·.'··'.92·' '(9"f · ·.·.Nu· ... . :::, : "' . :f ~:i?f-:~# ::f} ~i. :it :·: : ••. ~'. ' .·\ :; ' .114 18,7 ., · ... ,--105 ... , ... · .. ·.··. 92 r (90) .. ,.. SC 111t 19.5.. · · 104:_ .· :: __ .( · .. __ 91 ·. ·-,soi. N'J 1~5 ii.O .. 107 _·, 93 . (90) NU 116 16,0 .-109:.,: ·· .94 ~ (90) NU 116 15.1 '·1(16· ·:· .. ·· ·92 (90) SC 116 . 16.0 105"" -91 (90) NU 115 15.5 .t-04 .. ·. 91 (90! , NU,. 115 16 •. 2 103:,. ,. _9.0 : (90) .·, NU 114 . 17,? 1(13 ... 91 (9(1} NU : .. 104'",.' -:i' : ···.·· 114 18.4 .. 91 (90} NU ,. .~-'• . ::·:· r .. . . 11.0:. .. ... .. ··92 SC, 116. : .'-:107" ·. ·. (90) .. •. 116 '16.9 ... · ~ .. 108 . v 93 . . (90) ; SC. H6 .17.3 · , 105 . 91;. ., ('3(1~ NU .. 116 15. 9 -105 91 (90J'. NII I w If~ •• J 1i.2 103 91 i90)-NU Remarks Legend1 ., m1> = Required: Percent Cc,mpaction1 R-## =· Retested, on Test li!i1 SC=Sand1.Cor1!?1 .. 'NU=Nuclear, _[IC=Drive Cyl" OT=Otrier Elevation Test Test Test c,r Nwaber Date .Locatii;,n Depth 1990 (feet} ----759 : 02/2~ SEE MAP 284 760· 02/28 SEE MAP ~Br' 761 02h:e S~MAP 289 76_2· 02/28. SEE.MAP 290 7~. ·: OW~8 ... pEE MAP .292 :> ~,:~.-.. .. :.::: . .-> ": .: .... ·. : _ _.\· ·~.···: .. :'r1.···.r .•. :.-··.~ .. : .... ·: :. .. ~- .. :: .:,~:.-'~ :·:-·. ·_,-':.' TABLE 2 Field Density Test Results Curve No. Fill & MaximurA Moisture Dry Density. Content. (pcfl (percer1t} 5 115 16.6 5 115 17.8 5 115 17.6 5 115 14.3 .~ U-5 i-4.9 -... Page ii ;:'(1 Fill Dry Relative Der1si t y · ... Corppai;t ion (pcf.> (percent) 105 ·g2 104 91 105-92 104 91 104 91 : . : ~ Remar:ks (see leger,d) (90) NU (90) NU (90) NU -(90) NU (90) SC :-•• • .... _.-.·~:;:• 'l ... :;-,;_!;:·;·}·,··/<.~( ... "i: ::· . .--.:-\ .. ::··/,. -~: .. _ :~_;f\:i~f,; :.:,,-,:. . ·. ":', .... .. ·,:· r Pro.feet ,Nam~: carlsbatl airport cer,tre unit 2 ,. TABLE 2 Page V 1 Field Density test Results Elevation Curve·No. Fi'll Fill iest Test Test or. & Maximurn Moisture Dry Relative Number Date Lc,cat i or, Depth Dry Det,si ty Cor,ter,t Density Cc1D1pa.ct i c•r: Rernarks 1?90 ffeet) Cpcfl .!percer1tl Cpcf}. (percer,tl (see legend) -·---------- 786 Q3/08 _see 111ap 204 .. 4 116 15.6 106 '32 190) MJ 787 03(08 see 111ap -206 • "· 116 .16.4 108 93 (90) 1-'U -788 03/08 see i,ap 208 4 116 17. l 105 91 (90) SC i89 03/09 see· 111ap 210 '4 .116 16.1 105 91, (90) SC . 790 03)0'3 see map 212· ,'f. HG 14.4 106 92 (90) NU . ~ . .• . -,., ·:·. ·( ·:;\···: ·r . , . • . .. ··.; .... :·. ~-: . '·'.;, .. _-··· ... ,.-:' .. -, c-,,._-.. Fltld Dtn1lty T11t R11ulh Elevation Cury~ No. Fill Fill Test Test Test. cir & ~axi1i1urA Moisture Dry Relative Nuuber Date Location .:.Depth Dry Density Conter,t Den!?ity Compaction Rernarks 1990 (feet) (pcf) (percent) Cpcfl (percent) (see' leger1dl r 825 03117 · see map 283 5 115 16.;0 104 91 (90) NU 826 03/19. see raap 240 5 115 16.9 104 91 (9(1) NU ae1 03/19, see raap 242 r 115 17.6 105 91 (90) NU ..,. 828 03/19 see ,wap .: 245 5 115 15.4 103 90 ('3(1) NU .. ·829 03/19 see 11ap 247 5 115 15.,1 104 91 (90) NU . ;+ ··, •: I ,-~.; I• .. • ,i· . ....... -:-j ... ~-,: ' • ,. i I I f ~. J-. '\ ·.-~., .. -:.· .-· ... , ... :.. ·-::,:.; ' . . _ .. ;-:-. '"{· \ ,• I ·:.1. ., ; . •• ·,,t" . ·. · . '.'·: Field'De~si'ty.Test·: Resutt-s·· · ' ·. (·· ._\.:i,-. >·.:· _· .. :_. -'i_ ··:"\ . .-,>, ' · .. '' ... · ... : ... ,. . . .•. . . . ... • : .• ::::: .:~_ !' :· ,. • : •. ; ... ' ........ . '--· :·, : ... ,·:._ ., •, NO.N-RESIDENTIAL CERTIFICATE: Non-Residential Land Owner, please read this option carefully and be.sure you throughly understand the options before signing. The option y9u choose will affect your payment of the developed Special Tax assessed on your property. This option is available only at the time of the first bt.ildihg permit issuance. Property owner signature is required before a building permit will be issued. Your signature is confirming the accuracy of all parcel and ownership information shown. Telephone ''2:Z-7 0 GA-M-,AJo U,DA (h')lo\e. ~I-\ 'tS '-t ke_ \ \ ~j.:3 Aue... Address Project Address C..,~r(sbA~ C..A C/7-o v°J Carlsbad CA 92008 City state Zip Code City State Zip Code '-t't. .. O'.:l~-01.... .Assessor's Parcel Number, or APN and Lot Numberlf not yet subdivided. Building Permit Number As cited by Ordinance No. NS-155 and adopted by the City CounGil of the City of Carlsbad, California, the City is authorized to levy a special Tax in Community Facilities district No. 1. All non-residential property, upon the issuance of the first bt.ilding permit, shall have the option to (1) pay the SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT TAX ONE- TIME or (2) assume the ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX -DEVELOPED PROPERTY for a period not to exceed twenty- five (25) years. Please it:idicate your choice by initialing the appropriate line ,below: OPTION (1): OPTION (2): Amount One-Time Special Tax:· $ ] .1 J 1 "2.. E:J c • Owner's I elect10~1he SPECIAL DEVELOPMENTTAX(ONE-TIME nqw0 as a one-time payment. Initials · . I ·elect to pay the SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT TAX ANNUALLY for a period not to exceed twenty-five (25) years. Maximum Annual Special Tax:$ C, 1 ~ \ 1 , 87..,, . Owner Initials----,--· - I DO HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENAL TY OF PERJURY THAT THE UNDERSIGNED IS .THE PROPERTY OWNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND THAT I UNDERSTAND AND WILL COMPLY WITH THE PROVISION ' STATED ABOVE. erty Owner Title Print Name , Date The Ci~ ~~ Carlsbad has not indep~ndently veriijf d th~ i~formati?n showr{above. The~efore, we accept no respons1b1hty as to the accuracy or corripletenes!:. of this information. NON-RESIDENTIAL CERTIFICATE BUILDING INITIALS: CITY OF CARLSBAD -: COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 SPECIAL TAX CALCULA.TION WORKSHEET FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF NON-RESID'=NTIAL PROPERTY .., PLEASE PRINT ,.. ONE PER EACH BUILDING PERMIT ••• ENGINEERING INITIALS: ·PLA·NNING INITIALS:-,--------------~--FINANC.E INITIALS,------------------- FINAL: CRAFT: -:----,-.---,-------------------------------------- REQUIRED INFORMATION: .BUILDING: . A) PLAN CHECK NUMBER AND/OR BUILDING PERMIT NUMBER: . BJ PROPERTY OWNER(S) AS LISTED ON TITLE: OJ DESCRIPTlo'N OF WORK: PLANNING: I;) DATE OF INITIAL PARTICIPATION IN CF'.D: F) GENERAL PLAN .. DESJGNATION(S): (BOXES PROVIDE FOR THREE DIFFERENT USES, EXPAND AS REQUIRED.) F1) .VV'-F2) .F3) . G) NET OEVELOPABLE ACREAGE THAT WILL REMAIN BY GENERAL PLAN USE AFTER THE STRUCTURE(S) IS BUILT: G 1) G2) . G.3) A A H) T·YPE OF.LANO USE H1) REATEO BY T:HE ISS.UANCE OF THE BUILDING PERMIT-: (FROM SPECIAL TAX TABLE)' H~ H~ E'NGINEERING: I) SQUARE FEET OF BUILDING. PER USE JNOICATEO IN (H) ABOVE: 1 11) 112) SQF'TI .J) IMPROVEMENT AREA (CHECK ONE): WITHIN THE BTO -IMPROV.EMENT AREA I ( /13) SQF'TI OUTSIOE'THE. BTD -IMPROVEMENT AREA II ( K) LEGAL DE~· IPTION: (REQUlf;l.FQ.,ONLY WHEN G ABOVE IS ZERO(q).') · . PARCEL/ (CIRCLE ONE) _5~--OF PARCEL MAP --.\.-t.::Z.,,_lJ,~---IN THE CIT~ 01_C,-RLSBAO, Cf.\,I.NTY Of ri!Al-l~GO, STATE OF C·ALIFOR , Fil.EC IN THE OFFICE OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDER ON._..J.~--______ L_, --l.:l._U __ . (IF THE ABOVE JS NOT .ADEQUATE A FULL LEGAL DESCRIPTION MUST BE ATTACHED.) · \ BUILOIN,G: FINANCIAL PORTION TO BE FILLE.D OUT BY MIKE PETERSON.OR FAX TO BARBARA HALE 298-3783 FINANCE: L) SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT TAX. -.ONE-TIME, RATE PER SQUARE FOOT.:(FROM SPECIAL TAX TABLE,) I ~1) l·L2) s . . .. ,~3) M)SPECIALTAX -ONE-,TIME (lxL): I ~1-1 I M2) s ' 1~3) OBLIGATION·FOR UPCO!',IING YEAR: IF THE PARCEL IS ISSUED A BUILDIN<;3 PERMIT BETWEEN MARCH 2ND AND JUNE 30TH, AN OBLIGATION FOR THE UPCOMING YEAR IS CREATED AND WILL B'E 'LEVIEO IN THE FOLLOWING FISCAL YEAR. ,,:::-,_::,::,=:,·-.;:,.\',TOTAL,PA:V:OFF·'.OPTION'··1t:'_·,.,._:=:;_:,:,._://suM OF (Ml ABOVE. THE SPECIAL TAX LIEN ON THIS PROPERTY, WHEN CHOSJNG ·OP.TfdN 1, WILL: BE RELEASED WHEN ALL OUTSTANDING OBLIGATIONS HAVE BEEN PAID IN FULL. IF THERE IS A OBLIGATION FOR THE UPCO.MI.NG. YEAR, UNOEVl;LOP.,EO SPECIAL TAX WILL BE LEVIED IN THE UPCOMING FISCAL YEAR, AFTER PAYMENT OF WHICH THE LIEN WILL BE RELEASEp. IF THERE IS ONLY THE CURRENT YEAR'S OB.LIGATION OUTSTANDING, THE LIEN IS RELEASED WHEN BOTH INSTALLMENTS· HAVE BEEi'! PAI0, IIOPTION 1: S . l ( 112... ~o OISj.RIBUTJON OF PAYOFF: ACCOUNT NO, 430;-810-1340-11032 ·:._,.j,,:t;/'\:C,'PASS·:,THRU·.:opTION:·2(::f,:,,g:':,:,,/:':':llsuM OF (Ml ABOV.E TIMES 13.81 %. THE AMOUNT s·HOWN IS THE MAXIMUM ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX LEVIED ·FOR A PERICO OF TWENTY-FIVE (2!5) YEARS. IF THERE IS AN OBLIG~TION FOR THE UNPCOMING YEAR, THE A SQF UPCOMING YEAR'S TAXES WILL REFLECT THE OBLIGATION OF UNOEVELOPEO LANO TAX. THE TWENTY-FIVE YEAR ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX WOLiLO BEGIN IN THE'F0LLOWl'NG FISCAL YEAR. DISTRIBUTION: A COPY OF: FINAL CALCULATION SHEET, BUILDING PERMIT, ANO SIGNEO·CERTIFICATE A COPY OF: FINAL CALCULATION SHEET, BUll,OING PERMIT, ANO SIGNED CERTIFICATE A COPY OF: FINAL CALCULATION SHEET, ANO SIGNED CERTIFICA.TE . ALL ORleGINALS FEBRUARY jo, 19,94 IIOPTION 2: S CFO N9, 1 INCOMJN~ BOX FfNANCE (HELGA) PROPERTY OWNER BUILDING PERMIT FILE · VALID UNTIL ____________ _ I I ~ Nl-"1,-J_,.,. \""' ••-______ ,_ ••-• • .,_ ""' -~·•-' ,· ,•~•~•.-•..-,-'r ______ o,,. _ ,,_, " . DEC 15 '_95 13: 49 SMITH CWSULT. ARCH. ~--........ ,., ... ,-,, ... P.2-·2 CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE No.I" ya~ / ~.--CITY OF CARLSBAD ?Ian Check ½:!J._ 11J.J! W...;, DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING SERVICES DIVISION 207S LA$ PALMAS D-R •• _CARLSBAD, CA 92009 (619) 438-'-1161 This form shall· be used to dets-rmine the amount of school fees for' a project and to verify that the project applic;:ant has complied with the school fee requirements. No building permits for the prc>jects shall be issued until the certification is signed by the appropriate school district and returned to the City ·of Carlsbad Building Department. SCHOOL DISTRICT: ~ Carlsbad Unified 801 Pine Avenue San Marcos Unified ~l 290 West San Mar~s ahtd. Carlsbad, CA 92009 (434-0610) San Marcos, CA 92024 (744-4776) Encinitas Union 101 South Rancho Santa F=e Rd. . Encinitas, CA~ 92024 (619) 9~4-~300. __ San Dieguito Union High School 710 Encinitas Boulevard Encinitas, CA 92024 (753~6491) Project Applicant: &.fbaaHt, t)A;1Ly Project Address: / .lfS '-f k fd-,.;Lp bk RESIDENTIAL: SQ. FT. of living area _____ number of dwelling units ____ _ SQ. FT. of cover-ed area ____ SQ. FT. of garage area _____ _ COMMERCI AREA 3 9, PCJO J/J ----~-~-------~----------------· -----~----------~~---~~---------~~--~------~~~-~-----~~--~ FEE CERTIFICATION (To be completed by the School District} ___ Applicant has complied with fee requirement under Government Code 53080 ___ Project is subject to an existing fee agreement ---Project is exempt from Government Code 53080 Final Map approval and construction -started before September 1, 1986 • ......,.. __ (other school fees paid} - ___ Other-------------.----------------------- Residential Fee Levied: $ based on sq. ft. @ --------------------- .;-,.,.,,,_ / / ' II Ii , II \ !I I Hazardous Materials .... . 't,; Management Division BusineH Name SAN DIEGO REGIONAL-• • • ,I• HAZARDOUS MATERIALs·.auESTIONNAIRE j" I Telephone Animal f?J8-4+fz. Mailing Address 1-i.10 Camino City . · State · -· -:I ,. . · Zip · V,aa ~W{.,, ,vi!1,f1 &vt~~J-~11. tt20aq Plan File# Sita Address _ . · City .,;, State, _·,j, .Zip /'i1?4-(L1;tld~!1 Ai/e .1 C!ov-t~~ Cff .;.!q·zooq Plan File# PART I: FIRE DEPARTMENT· HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MANAGEMENT DIVISION: OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION Indicate by circling the item, whether your business will use, proca_ss, or store any of the following hazardous materials. If al'ly of the items are circled, applican~.,:r,ust contact the Fire. Protection Agency with jurisdiction prior to plan su,bmittal •. _ ,; ·] . <P. ·explosive or Blasting Agents· 4. Flammable Solids 7,' Pyrophoiics --1 O.! Cryogenics 13, Corrosivei Compressed Gases . &. Organic Peroxides 8, Unstable ReactivH 11 ~· Highly Toxic or Toxic Materials · 14. Other Health Hazards Flammable or Combustible Uqulds S. · Oxidizers • .. ~. Water·Reactlv~s· -:..;r;z,,-R~diC?!C~~es !?ART II: COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO HEALTH DEPARTMENT. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MANAGEMENT OJVJSIONi CONTINGENCY PLAN REVIEW; . . -· -. -. : . · ._.I. · • · . • OFFICE USE ONL', If the answer to any of the questions is yes, applicant must C()ntact the County of San Ciego Hazardous Materials Management ~~~~:~~· p~;!~. Imperial Avenue, 3rd Floor, San: Diego, CA 9 218 6-5261, _· Telep~~ne _ ( 0 6~ ~)( ~38-2222 prior"to the issuance of a D RMPP Exempt ,·,·.,1,,.., .• t:· FEES MAY BE REQUIRED Data Initials • o ! •' • I •, • • ,•, _I Yes No . . J • , ... • . • 1 • •• D RMPP Required h Qt( t::J Is your business listed on the re~itrse side of this forml' · · ··, , · · .•. ;·· ·' :;-· • ~ · I 2. D ~ Will your business dispose of Hazardous Substance• or Medical Wiste In any amount'f : ·-Cata Initials 3. D 18 Will your business store or handle Hazardous Substances In quantit!H equal to or great.er. than 55 gallons, , 500 pound,, 200 oubio feet or 0arcinogen1/reproauct1ve toxins In any quantltyl' __ ·-· ·D RMPP Complet~c 4. CJ Will your business use an exl1tlng or install· an underground storage tank? I-' ·. 5. CJ Will your business store er handle Ac\!tely Hazardous Materials? Cate Initials PART lllj SAN DIEGO COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROi. DISTRICT i If the answer to any of the questions i1 yes, applicant must contact the Air Pollutjon:C--ontrol Oistrict, 9150 Chesapeake Drive, San Diego, CA 92123 Telephone (619) 694-3307 prior to the 1,suance of a building permit, · · ·1• • YES NO · · · .. -· :· --.. · · 1. CJ_3Will the intended occuP.int Install or use ahy of the equipment .listed on :the Usting, of Air Pollution Control District Permit Categories, on th 1: . · reverse side of this forml' · -, : , · ·. · 2. Cl t::J (ANSWER ONLY IF QUESTION 1 IS YES.) Will the subject facility be located within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school (K througr 1'2) as listed in the current Directory of School and Community College Districts, published by the San Diego County Office of Education an,: the current California Private School Directory, compiled In accordance with provisions of Education Code Section 331907 B;1efly describe nature ot the intended business act1V1ty:· · · \ }1kwV~~ 1: c;~'-t,,t,t;t~ w~~ --t'i'i..~l~ ~~(~i~u~,,Tl~~~J Name of Owner or Authorized Agent: h / ~::·· ;/. . -· · ... ·. , ... --_ --v~t 1 . l · ·.··· Signature of Owner or Authorized Agent: I decla and correct. · Do not write below tliis line ury that tQ the best of my knowiadge and belief the responses made herein are tru.,, ,, . j ;;-.,<.~~~'i Date:--~----~--- FIRE DEPARTMENT OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION: _______ ...,.,... __ .. _,,,_.,_.-ii __________________ _ BY:, _________________ __, __ ,.... ___ ....; _______ ,r_, ____ Cate: _______________ _ EXEMPT FROM PERMIT REQUIREMENTS APPROVED 1'01'1 BUILOINQ PEI\MIT'-IUT NOT OCCUPANCY-: .·APPl'IOVEO FOIi OC!=UPANCY .. .. COUNTY·HMMO APCO COUNTY-HMMD APCO COUNTY-HMMD. APCO '. : " -.-. .' .. . . l q . ·. 1 L J,.J£_LL·C/l!b f/Vc. _ ':'f_ZiFO _ I>~\ 5, ' !-,~ f'(;j.., "fl,, ()Ct.:lb 'J~OfJt>Jt/ 111D11rr 11.Vll .. /W,5 -Sp1vn 1<.1.-..0VJJ 1 o/'1tJ .(J. ,f/k, ts/ o l 1>.fJ Iv ~I.Vt I IWrn vptt:r 1t,J;J.t; /J ..,---- To ui,L. s!r?lr.s--:r f fZ r_,, -s Ir-I <,r PLhb ~~ 5/is/crs- ~J;,,,-;;µ;1 0/ n nj:.. :;z. '-I ~-s 1to«ulbfi-CA-t-.c,f r St? r kf A. Llt1 JZr-~ :;d;,.... j ~ fr/f2/J-A. {]PUS ~ t/J-1-J ~ ~ /~ rn fjl)S-ri,tA t,, W!J:ST£-ff)f r0 /J~-lv!L lu/J n-Sl1J/c;J'-- ) i ·-( =it4 ~ 11£:@ 'iQ, ~tio/ "t" -~ )( /l;de v S,.o? c-f\.iZiJL_ ,,, ,.._ r r-CC~ '----.. 6 /-sJ /61 { l-vh t .. _ l/~/ ~ GGh . 11m?r-~ PJ :f~ . ;(~irs--1/,~ ~ ~ W-,r/o ~C-rc .·: 7 li '\l k( l UM . : s: 111 ff Jr ;,y u1 Hv .J:;:, Off1 fo _; e,?/7-./W.J,,I, t ~ ,,,, S',J " ;· ';?~C\S-::rL-~IVV\~ te-d-c,,1.-t-'f ~ \ti f le-'"'-"'\ '\it I -( ((" {z,,7..--(2.otr ' '(1-J crs--J;d-nr. . to -:f-MV ( OV'DP) I ., _. ~ '~t~· \ (;,Jt,t,v-i, '1 ...,___. ___, -----r A P P R O V A L S . ,_ · ~-:+"'-f' Date l / b:_ (l .. \ ~ Bullding L'l. lS'/'1:r:: Planning . Engineering = 2fb--1f P.r Fire _____ coastal / /' _______ Assoc l Hoelth .DATES To l trom [ A=plicant;llcanl Q-,..l(\~ q,r-: Y¼# HAZ MAT FoRM IND WASTE APP _::; k1H{ E I SCHOOL FEE FORM ,Jiir< ~ PLAN CORR ' ' ;_ ENGRG CORR · -I eusuc ~ w,~_. COFO r { I I L I I .r-f -----_.,,,,.e ,---~ -• • -, ! l ·! B U I L D '·I N G 09/25/96. 14:33 Page 1 of 1 Job Address: 1954 KELLOGG AV Pe~mit.Type: PLAN CHECK REVISION P ERM I '1'' su.i te: Parcel.No: 212~092-02-00 Lot#: PCR :Wo: PCJ:<96021 Project No: A9500894 Development No: . ' Vafuation ! 0 . Construction ·Type: VN . Occupancy Groupr B2 Reference#~ Cp95605 Status: ISSUED Des-cription: RECONFIGURED OFFICES,ADD DlSAB. . Applied: 05/17/96 : SHOWER ON 1ST FLR,-2ND FLR-MOV .WALL&WIND .. Apr/Issue: 0"9/25/9·6 · . . E.p.tered By:· RMA 6_19=438-44~45 -09/25/96_0001 01 02 Appl/Ownr C-PRMT CITY OF CARLSBAD 'Z075 Las ,Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009· (619), 438-i161 Date: To: From:· Re: 19 September 1996 File Principal Building Inspector Conversation w/ Scott Cairns / Daley Plan Revisions I spoke with Architect Cairns today re: plan check comments for revisions to the Daley project. 1 asked him how come he told the plan checker I had agreed to accept the exiting system as is with inadequate separation of exits. I reminded Cairns that we, Cairns and I had disagreed on this and that I agreed with the plan checker; more separation of exits was required . He said he must have misunderstood me. I told him I cannot believe this went misunderstood based upon the three way conference we had with him, Culver, and me. I asked Cairns what had caused this Code violation to occur. He said they (Daley) had moved a wall out to create a larger office. I told him that the obvious solution was to either move the wall back or design a tenant improvement to allow the third stairs to be legally utilized as a required exit. I confirmed this with Kurt Culver by telephone. Kurt stated that Cairns told him I had reconsidered my prior position. I told Kurt that Cairns and I had not spoken since our conversation three weeks ago. In a subsequent teleconference conversation w/ Daley and Cairns, Cairns agreed to propose a different solution. Daley was upset tha:t I wouldn't grant a "variance" for this Code violation that was created by his decision to construct something without prior ap o al. PATRICK KELLEY Principal Building Inspector CC: Inspector Phillips • Page 1 EsGil Corporatlon Professional Plan !F.!,view 'Engineers DATE: September 13, 1996 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 95-605 REV 4 PROJECT ADDRESS: 1954 Kellogg Ave. SET: II ~T DFIRE D PLAN REVIEWER D FILE PROJECT NAME: :Paily Industrial Building Floor Plan Revisions D The plans transmitted herewith have been conected where necessary and substantially cornply with the jurisdiction's ********'If** codes. [g] The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes When minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted_ herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. D The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. D The applici;tnt's copy of the check list has been sent to: D· Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. [g] Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Scott Cairn Date contacted: 9/13/96 (by: kc) Telephone#: appt. [g] REMARKS: The designer stated that the building official would allow the upper level e~it separation to be acceptable as shown. Please verify. By: Kurt Culver Esg ii Corporation D GA D CM O EJ O PC log Enclosures: City-approved plans trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (619) 560-1468 + Fax (619) 560-1576 <· EsGil Corporation Professiona{ P{an 'l{eview 'Engineers DATE: May 28, 1996 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 95-605 REV 4 PROJECT ADDRESS: 1954 Kellogg Ave~ SET:I Cl APPLICANT ~ Cl FIRE ~NREVIEWER Cl FILE PROJECT NAME: Daily Industrial Building Floor Plan Revisions D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's *********** codes. D The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's ********** codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. [XI The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. [XI The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Smith Consulting Architects 5355 Mira Sorrento Place Suite 750 §an Diego 92121 [XI Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. D Esgil Corporation staff did advise the.applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted: (by: ) Telephone #: D REMARKS: By: Kurt Culver Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA DCM 0 EJ D GP D PC 5/20/96 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 2.08 + San Di~go, California 92123 + (619) 560-1468 + Fax (619) 560-1576 l I r Carisbad 95-605 REV 4 May 28, 1996 GENERAL PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 1954 Kellogg Ave. DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 5/20/96 REVIEWED BY: Kurt Culver FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): PLAN CHECK NO.: 95-605 REV 4 DATE REVIEW COMPLETED: May 28, 1996 This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code arid state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1994 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints to: ESGIL CORPORATION. 2. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. 3. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? 0 Yes D No 4. Each sheet of the plans must be signed/sealed by the original licensed persons responsible for the preparation of the pl~ns. 5. Submit revised plumbing/mechanical/electrical plans associated with the revisions now shown. Also, submit the revised reflected ceiling plan, floor plan enlargements, etc. that correspond to these revisions. ,. Carlsbad 95-605 REV 4 May 28, 1996 6. Submit revised energy documentation for the revisions now shown. 7. Show fire protection for the new closet under the stair. 8. Some of the new windows appear to be within 24" of a door. Show tempered glazing. 9. The required 12" dimension at the PUSH side of doors 108, 110, etc. should be shown. 10. With the enlarged break room size, etc., it appears t.hat the occupant load tributary to the lower level corridor is such that the corridor itself requires two exits. Please justify the exit scheme shown. · 11. Fill in the empty reference bubbles. 12. A shower is now shown at the upper AND lower levels. Provide complete· detailing and notes to show they comply with Title 24. 13. Until the area in the southwest corner of sheet A3 becomes occupied, the occupants on the second floor rely .upon the stairs at grids B/1 and A/3 for exiting. They are not far enough apart for the new diagonal created. 14. The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 619/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Kurt Culver at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. Carlsbad 95-605 REV 4 May 28, 1996 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PREPARED BY: Kurt Culver PLAN CHECK NO.: 95-605 REV 4 DATE: May 28, 1996 BUILDING ADDRESS: 1954 Kellogg Ave. BUILDING OCCUPANCY: B TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V-N BUILDING PORTION BUILDING AREA VALUATION VALUE (ft.2) MULTIPLIER ($) Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE D 199 UBC-.Building Permit Fee D Bldg. Permit Fee by ordinance: $ D 199 UBC Plan Check Fee D Plan Check Fee by ordinance: $ Type of Review: r;gJ Complete Review D Structural Only r;gJ Hourly D Repetitive Fee Applicable D Other: Esgil Plan Review Fee: $ 174.30 Comments: Esgil fee = 2 hrs. @ 87 .15/hr. -------------------~------------------------------------------------ Fire Services Review: D FireAlarm D Complete Review _ D Other: Esgil Fire Services Review Fee: Comments: D Suppression System $ Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue.doc 5196 I ~ Sep-19-96 10:16A sm;th Con~ult;ng Arch. TRANS MITT AL TO: JOB NO: PROJECT: 619 452 3907 Smith Consulting Architects 5355 Mira Sorrento Place, Suite 750 San Diego, California 92121 (619) 452-3188· FAX (619) 452-3907 ;J!;j z~lrt.iJ ATTN: f'_,,f &tfvj DATe_·~~~/~~7~fW~--- WE ARE SENDING YOU: a;(Prints/Copies · O Presentation Material O Samples O Submittal/Shop Drawings .O Specifications D Copy of Letter o Computer Diskette O Other Copies Date Description ACTION CODE: A For your use 8 For your review & comment C For your approval D As requested 0 Mail tJ Overnight Delivery O Messenger 0 Fax# f 3 !)-()814-- This form is page 1 of "2- Action Code E For your action F See remarks below Coples lo: With Encl. W/0 Encl. ~ / L File 1 D D 9-/9-'JG, /4j. /iJt''J fJJX t~~&~~ 6. g 0 D P.01 . Sep-19-96 10:16A Smith Consultirig Arch. ~ I t 1C 4 -II:?. L------ r.:....----- 1 ---'I.-, I r---, I·. . I I I _ __,_ __ :-I . I :€f: I . I L..--..J r-------, I IFUTURE OFFICES I I [1[] I I I I I I I I L.------.J 619 452 3907 P.02 ' ·'·! •, • • ~· • I I • ~ , ,• ~ --E>1-0• x s•-0• &L. WINDOW St w/¼'C"RWF!R . TTP.O:: 2 10 All --E,'-12>1 x S'-0' WINDOW w/ 14' CLR GLA~ PE~w TTP.Cf4 ~ r---, I I I I I I I I I I I I L--..J Q ' -~ Q I s. r---, ·I I I I I I I I I I I I L--..J /}&il:J £,iJ, ~114 f(~ r--·. I I I I I I . L--· r--- 1 I I I I ' TITLE 24 REPORT FOR: Daily Industrial Building Lot 38, Carlsbad Airport Centre Carlsbad PROJECT DESIGNER: Smith Consulting Architects 5355 Mira Sorrento Place, Ste. 750 San Diego, CA 92121 (619) 452-3188 REPORT PREPARED BY: Michael Dell DELL CO. 1629 York Drive Vista, CA 92084 (619) 940-0064 Job Number: 041795sw Date: 9/3/1996 The COMPLY 24 computer program has been used to perform the calculations summarized in this compliance report. This program has approval and is authorized by the California Energy Commission for use with both the Residential and Nonresidential Building Energy Efficiency Standards. This program developed by Gabel Dodd Associates (510) 428-0803. l Table Of Contents for Title 24 Report Cover Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Table of Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Form ENV-1 Envelope Certificate of Compliance ....................... 3 Form ENV-2 Envelope Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Form MECH-1 Mechanical Certificate of Compliance .................... 9 ~orm MECH-2 Mechanical Summary ...................................... 12 Form MECH-3 Mechanical Equipment Summary ............................ 16 Form MECH-4 Mechanical Ventilation .................................. 17 HVAC Zone & Space Loads Summary ..................................... 18 HVAC Equipment Spec Sheets ......•................................... 26 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE (part 1 of 2) Project Name: Daily Industrial Building Address: Lot 38, Carlsbad Airport-Centre ENV-1 page 3 of 34 :Date: 9/3/1996 I '----------Carlsbad Envelope / Building Permit No I , _________ _ Designer: Smith Consulting Architects :checked by/ Date I I Documentation: DELL CO. :coMPLY 24 User 1712 ------·-------------------------------------------------------------------- GENERAL INFORMATION Date of Plans:______ Building Conditioned Floor Area: 3945 sf Building Type: Noniesidential Climate Zone: 7 Phase of Construction: J("New Construction O Addition O Alteration Method of Envelope Compliance: Prescriptive -Overall Envelope STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE This Certificate of Compliance lists the building features and performance specifications needed to comply with Title 24, Part 6, Chapter 1 and Title 20, Chapter 2, Subchapter 4, Article 1 of the California Code of Regula- tions. This certificate applies only to building envelope requirements. The Principal Envelope Designer hereby certifies that the proposed build- ing design represented in this set of construction documents is consistent with the other compliance forms and worksheets, with the specifications, and with any other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed building has been designed to meet the envelope requirements contained in sections 110, 116 through 118, and 143 or 149 of Title 24, P~rt 6, Chapter 1. Please check one: O I hereby affirm that I am eligible under the provisions of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code to sign this document as the person responsible for its preparation; and that I am a civil engineer or architect. O I affirm that I am eligible under the exemption to Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code by Section 5537.2 of the Business and Professions Code to sign this document as the person responsible for its preparation; and that I am a licensed contractor preparing docu- ments for work that I have contracted to perform. O I affirm that I am eligible under the exemption to Division 3· of the Business and Professions Code by Section ____ of the _____ Code to sign this document as the person responsible for preparation; and for the following J, PRINCIPAL ENVELOPE DESIGNER Smith Consulting Architects its (619) 452-3188 ( Lic/2i9~ (Date) '7 ·/ZJ ·f6 ENVELOPE MANDATORY MEASURES Indicate location on plans of Note Block for Mandatory Measures:. __ _ CERTIFICATE OF C~MPLIANCE (part 2 of 2) Project Name: Daily Industrial Building Documentation: DELL CO. ENV-1 page 4 of 34 :Date: 9/3/1996 I I :coMPLY 24 User 1712 ---·--------~-------------------------------------------------------------- OPAQUE SURFACES Const Assembly Name Type Location/Comments Note to Field ----~--------------------------------------------------------6" Concrete Wall R-1i Mtl Wall/int R-19 Roof (R.i9.2x8.16) R-19 Roof/ T-bar R-11 Floor(F.11.2x6.16) Solid Wood Door Hollow Metal Door FENESTRATION Frame Orient Panes Type ------------------ Front ( N) . 1 Metal Front (N) 1 Metal Left (E) 1 Metal Right (W) 1 Metal Front (N) 1 Metal None Metal Wood Wood Wood None None Exterior Shade -----------------------Interior Window Interior Window None None None OH N N N N N Glazing Type -----------------------Single Clear ( Mtl) Single Clear ( Mtl) Guardian SS-20 Green Guardian SS-20 Green Guardian SS-20 Green OVERALL ENVELOPE METHOD Part 1 of 4 Project Name: Daily Industrial Building Documentation: DELL CO. WINDOW AREA TEST A. Display Perimeter 0.0 ft X 6 ft ::::: B. Gross Exterior Wall Area 2413.0 sf X 0.40 ::::: C. Gross Exterior Wall Area 2413.0 sf X 0 .10 ::::: D. Enter Larger of A or 8 E. Enter Proposed Window Area If E is greater than Dor less than C, proceed to for window area-adjustment. 1. If Eis greater than D: D. Maximum Standard Area N/A 2. If Eis less than c: C. Minimum Standard Area -----------------------N/A SKYLIGHT AREA TEST If I I not, go to part 2 E. Proposed Area N/A E. Proposed Area N/A ::::: :::: ENV-2 page 5 of 34 :Date: 9/3/1996 l I :coMPLY 24 User 1712 0.0 sf Display Area 965.2 sf 40% Area 241.3 sf Min Std Area 965.2 sf Max Std Area 812.0 sf Proposed Area the next calculation of 4. Window Adjustment Factor N/A Window Adjustment Factor N/A Atrium Height 0.0 ft If Height< 55 ft If Height>= 55 ft Standard= 5% ----------+----------Standard= 10% l I V A. Gross Exterior Roof Area 2573.0 sf X 0.05 = 128.7 sf Standard Area B. Enter Proposed Skylight Area 0.0 sf Proposed Area If the Proposed Skylight Area is greater than the Standard Skylight Area, proceed to the next calculation for the skylight area adjustment. If not got to part 2 of 4. ·1. If Proposed Skylight Area> Standard Skylight Area: Standard Skylight Area N/A I. Proposed Skylight Area N/A :::: Skylight Adjustment Factor N/A OVERALL ENVELOPE METHOD Part 2 of 4 Project Name: Daily Industrial Building Documentation: DELL CO. OVERALL HEAT LOSS ENV-2 page 6 of 34 lDate: 9/3/1996 I I ICOMPLY 24 User 1712 PROPOSED Adj. STANDARD Assembly Name Area 6" Concrete Wall 6" Concrete Wall 6" concrete Wall Guardian ss-20 Green Guardian SS-20 Green Guardian SS-20 Green 6" Concrete ~all 6" Concrete Wall Guardian S$-20 Green Guardian SS-20 Green 6" Concrete Wall 6" Concrete Wall R-19 Roof/ T-bar R-11 Floor(F.11.2x6.16) Guardian SS-20 Green Guardian SS-20 Green 6 11 Concrete Wall 6" Concrete Wall R-19 Roof/ T-bar 160.0 28.0 298.0 100.0 24.0 192.0 128.0 86.0 28.0 24.0 .220 .0 415.0 777.0 64.0 96.0 144.0 100.0 370.0 1796.0 ** OVERALL HEAT LOSS COMPLIES HC U-Val UxA Area U-Val UxA 15.4 15.4 15 .. 4 NIA NIA NIA 15.4 15.4 NIA N/A 15.4 15 .4 2.1 1.0 N/A N/A 15.4 15.4 2.1 0.752 0.752 0.752 1.000 ·1 .000 1.000 0.752 0.752 1.000 1.000 0.752 0.752 0.049 0.074 1.000 1.000 0.752 0.752 0.049 120.3 21.1 224.1 100.0 24.0 192.0 96.2 64.7 28.0 24.0 165.4 312.0 38.2 4.7 96.0 144.0 75.2 278.2 88.3 Total 2096.3 160.0 28.0 298.0 100.0 24.0 192.0 128.0 86.0 28.0 24.0 220.0 415.0 777.0 64.0 96.0 144.0 100.0 370.0 1796.0 0.690 0.690 0.690 1.230 1.230 1.230 0.690 0.690 1.230 1.230 0.690 0.690 0.078 0.076 1.230 1.230 0.690 0.690 0.078 110.4 19.3 205.6 123.0 29.5 236.2 88.3 59.3 34.4 29.5 151.8 286.3 60.6 4.9 118.1 177.1 69.0 255.3 140.1 Total 2198.8 PROPOSED UA <= STANDARD UA ** OVERALL ENVELOPE METHOD Part 3 of 4 ENV-2 page 7 of 34 ---------------------------------·-----------------------------------------Project Name: Daily Industrial Building Documentation: DELL CO. :Date: 9/3/1996 l I :coMPLY 24 User 1712 ----------------------------------.. ---------------------------------------- OVERA~L HEAT GAIN PROPOSED STANDARD Glazing WF Area SC H V OHF Total Area RSHG Total _ .. ______________ ------.....,; ___ ------------------- North 0.34 100.0 0.34 11.6 100.0 0.94 32.0 East 1.02 24.0 0.34 8.3 24.0 0.71 17.4 West 1.34 192.0 0.34 · 87 .5 192.0 0.71 182.7 North 0.34 28.0 0.34 3.2 28.0 0.94 8.9 West 1.34 24.0 0.34 10.9 24.0 0.71 22.8 North 0.34 96.0 0.34 11.1 96.0' 0.94 30.7 West 1.34 144.0 0.34 65.6 144.0 0.71 137.0 ------------- Total 198.2 Total 4268.3 ** OVERALL HEAT GAIN COMPLIES PROPOSED HG<= STANDARD HG** OVERALL ENVELOPE METHOD Part 4 of 4 ENV-2 page 8 of 34 ------------------------------------. -------------------------------------- Project Name: Daily Industrial Building Documentation: DELL CO. Window Area Adjustme.nt Calculations Gros::;s Door Wall Name Dir Area Area ---------------------------------- Front w 260.0 Left N 52.0 .Rig.ht s 490.0 Front w 156.0 Right s 110.0 Front w 316.0 Right s 559.0 Front w 100.0 Right s 370.0 ----------- TOTALS 2413.0 120.0 Skylight Area Adjustment Calculations Gross Roof Name Dir Area --------------------·------- BUR H 777.0 BUR H 1796.0 ----- TOTALS 2573.0 Window Area ------ 100.0 24.0 192.0 28.0 24.0 96.0 144.0 0.0 0.0 ------ 812.0 Skylt Area ------ 0.0 :oate: 9/3/1996 I I /COMPLY 24 User 1712 Adjusted Adjust Window Wall Factor Area Area ------------------ 1.0000 100.0 160.0 1.0000 24.0 28.0 1.0000 192.0 298.0 1.0000 28.0 128.0 1.0000 24.0 86.0 1.0000 96.0 220.0 1.0000 144.0 415.0 1.0000 0.0 100.0 1.0000 0.0 370.0 ------------ 812.0 1481.0 Adjusted Adjust Skylt Roof Factor Area Area ------------------ 0.0000 0.0 777.0 0 .0 0 0 .0000 0.0 1796.0 ------------------ 0.0 0.0 2573.0 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE (part 1 of 3) MECH-1 page 9 of 34 ----------~----------------------------------------------------------------Project Name: Daily Industrial Building Address: Lot 38, Carlsbad Airport Centre Carlsbad Mechanical Designer: Slayton Mechanical Documentation: DELL CO. lDate: 9/3/1996 I ·----·· ----:Building Permit No I · ------~---: checked by I Date I I lCOMPLY 24 User 1712 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- GENERAL INFORMATION Date of Plans: ______ Building Conditioned Floor Area: 3945 sf Building Type: Nonresidential Climate Zone: 7 Phase of Construction: _ /New Construction O Addition· O Alteration Method of Mechanical Compliance: Prescriptive Proof of Envelope Compliance: O Previous Permit ,Pompliance Attached STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE This Certificate of Compliance lists the building features and performance specifications needed to comply with Title 24, Part 6, Chapter 1 and Title 20, Chapter 2, Subchapter 4, Article 1 of the California Code of Regula- tions. This certificate applies only to building mechanical requirements. The Principal Mechanical Designer hereby certifies that the proposed build·- ing design represented in this set of construction documents is consistent with the other compliance forms and worksheets, with the specifications, and with any other calculations submitted with this permit application. The pr6posed building has been designed to meet t~e mechanical requirements conta.ined in sections 110 through 115, 120 through 124, 140 through 142,144 and 145. Please· check one: O I hereby affirm that I am eligible under the provisions of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code to sign this document as the person responsible for its preparation; and that I am a civil engineer mechanical engineer or architect. O I affirm that I am eligible under the exemption to Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code by Section 5537.2 of the Business and Professions Code to sign this document as the person responsible for its preparation; and that I am a licensed contractor preparing docu- ments for work that I have contracted to perform. O I affirm that I am eligible under the exemption to Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code by Section ____ of· the ____ .. ··········-··---- -----Code to sign this document as the person responsible for its preparation; and for the following reason: ~----- PRINCIPAL MECHANICAL DESIGNER Slayton Mechanical (619) 449-1272 MECHANICAL MANDATORY MEASURES (Signature) (Lie.#) (Date) Indicate location on plans of Note Block for Mandatory Measures: CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE (part 2 of 3) MECH-1 page 10 of 34 -------------------------------------------------------------------------Project Name: Daily Industrial Building Docum~ntation: DELL co. :Date: 9/3/1996 I I ]COMPLY 24 User 1712 SYSTEM FEATURES Zone Name Time Control 1s~Fl. lobby/conf 1st Fl. Break/Hall s Setback Control None # of Isolation Zonesn/a HP Thermostat n/a Electric Heat n/a Fan Control Constant Volume VAV Min Position n/a Simul. Heat/Cool n/a Heat Supply Reset Constant Temp Cool Supply Reset Constant Temp Ventilation C ----OA Damper Control __.Ac->....-- Economizer Type No Econ9mizer Outdoor Air CFM 92 Heat Equip Type Electric Res None n/a n/a n/a Constant Volume n/a n/a Constant Temp Con(>tant Temp A No Economizer 114 Electric Res Make & Model No. Cool Equip Type Make and Model DX DX RHEEM RAKA-024J/RBHA-14 RHEEM RAKA-042C/RBHA-21 Zone Name 2nd Fl. Open Time Control 4=:> Setback Control None # of Isolation Zonesn/a HP Thermostat Yes Electric Heat 0.0 KW Fan Control Constant Volume VAV Min Position n/a Simul. Heat/Cool n/a Heat Supply Reset Constant Temp Cool Supply Reset Constant Temp Ventilation C OA Damper Control 6- Economizer Type No Economizer Outdoor Air CFM 117 Heat Equip Type Heat Pump Make & Model No. RHEEM ROKA-0365 Cool Equip Type DX Make and Model· Code Tables Time Control s:Prog Switch o:occ Sensor M:Man Timer Ventilation B:Air Balance C:OA Cert. M:OA Measure D:Demand Cont N:Natural 2nd Fl. Interior/Add. s None n/a Yes 0.0 KW Constant Volume n/a n/a Constant Temp Constant Temp C' No Economizer 269 Heat Pump RHEEM RJKA-060C DX OA Damper A:Auto ·' G:Gravity Note to Field -------------------- CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE (part 3 of 3) MECH-1 page 11 of 34_ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------Project Name: Daily Industrial Building Documentation: DELL CO. /Date: 9/3/1996 I I lCOMPLY 24 User 1712 DUCT INSULATION System Name Duct Tape Insul Note to R-Val Field RHEEM RQKA-O365 RHEEM RJKA-O6OC PIPE INSULATION Type ------- Heating Cooling Heating Cooling Heating Cooling Heating Cooling Duct Location· -------------------Ducts in Conditioned Ducts in Conditioned Ducts in Conditioned Ducts in Conditioned Ducts in Attic Ducts in Attic Ducts in Attic Ducts in Attic System Name Pipe Type Insul Required Domestic Hot Water --------0/ N / N / N NOTES TO FIELD -For Building Department Use Only Allowed ------y / N y / N y / N y / N y / N y / N y / N / N 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 Note to Field --------------------------------, _________________________________________ _ MECHANICAL SIZING AND FAN. POWER Project Name: Daily Industrial Building Documentation: DELL CO. MECH-2 page 12 of 34 /Date: 9/3/1996 I I :coMPLY 24 User 1712 -----------------~--------------------------------------------------------- SIZING AND EQUIPMENT SELECTION HVAC Zone Name: Heating System Name: Cooling System Name: System Multiplier: Peak Load Method: Relative Humidity: 1. DESIGN CONDITIONS FOR Carlsbad 2. SIZING SPACES SERVED BY SYSTEM -----_________ , _______ _ 1st Fl. Lobby/Conf PEAK (Jan 12am) TOTAL SPACE LOAD Duct Gains & Losses: Ventilation: ( 92 CFM) Return Air Lighting Gain TOTAL SYSTEM LOAD 3. SELECTION A. Safety/Warmup Factor B. Maximum Adjusted Load C. Installed Equipment Capacity Btu/hr 25935 25935 2594 3178 31707 1.43 45341 0 1st Fl. lobby/conf RHEEM RAKA-024J/RBHA-14 1 COINCIDENT 50 % HEATING 38 F COOLING SENSIBLE LATENT PEAK (Jul 5pm) 83 F Btu/hr 21825 21825 2182 298 0 24305 1.21 29409 18203 67 F Btu/hr 246 246 ' 117 363 6448 If Line 3-C > Line 3-B~ Explain: ___________________ _ FAN POWER CONSUMPTION No. Efficiency Peak Conv Peak Supply Fan Description Sys BHP Motor Drive HP Fact Watts CFM ---------------------------------------------------- Supply Fan 1 X 0 .13 I [O .55 X 1 .00] = 0.23 X 746 = 170 700 ---------------- Totals 0.23 170 700 FAN POWER DEMAND 170 watts/ 700 cfm = 0.242 watts/cfm MECHANICAL SIZING AND FAN POWER MECH-2 page 13 of 34 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------Project Name: Daily Industrial Building Documentation: DELL CO. :Date: 9/3/1996 I I :coMPLY 24 User 1712 SIZING AND EQUIPMENT SELECtION HVAC Zone Name: Heating System Name: Cooling System Name: System Multiplier: Peak Load Method: Relative Humidity: 1. DESIGN CONDITIONS FOR Carlsbad 2. SIZING SPACES SERVED BY SYSTEM PEAK 1st Fl. Break/hall Warehouse/Manufact. (Jan 12am) (Jan 12am) TOTAL SPACE LOAD Duct Gains & Losses: Ventilation: ( 3311 CFM) Return Air Lighting Gain TOTAL SYSTEM LOAD 3. SELECTION A. Safety/Warmup Factor B. Maximum Adjusted Load C. Installed Equipment Capacity Btu/hr ------- 12574 0 ------- 12574 1257 79756 ------- 93587 1.43 133829 0 1st Fl. Break/Hall RHEEM RAKA-042C/RBHA-21 HEATING 38 F PEAK ( Jul 3pm) ( Jul 3pm) 1 COINCIDENT 50 % COOLING SENSIBLE LATENT 83 F 67 F Btu/hr Btu/hr -------------- 9181 303 0 0 -------------- 9181 303 918 17848 4223 0 -------------- 27947 4526 1.21 33816 32834 11739 If Line 3-C > Line 3-B, Explain=------------------'---- FAN POWER CONSUMPTION No. Efficiency Peak Conv Peak Supply Fan Description Sys BHP Motor Drive HP Fact Watts CFM ---------------------------------------------------- Supply Fan 1 X 0.33 I [O .64 X 1 .00] ::::: 0.52 X 746 ::::: 385 1400 ----------___ .,. ___ Totals 0.52 385 1400 FAN POWER DEMAND 385 watts I 1400 cfm ::::: 0.275 watts/cfm MECHANICAL SIZING AND FAN POWER Project Name: Daily Industrial Building Documentation: DELL CO. MECH-2 page 14 of 34 lDate: 9/3/1996 I I :coMPLY 24 User 1712 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIZING AND EQUIPMENT SELECTION HVAC Zone Name: Heating System Name: Cooling System Name: System Multiplier: Peak Load Method: Relative Humidity: 1. DESIGN CONDITIONS FOR Carlsbad 2. SIZING PEAK SPACES S~RVED BY SYSTEM 2nd Fl. Open Office ( Jan 12am) TOTAL SPACE LOAD Duct Gains & Losses: Ventilation: ( 117 CFM) Return Air Lighting Gain TOTAL SYSTEM LOAD 3. SELECTION A. Safety/Warmup Factor 8. Maximum Adjusted Load C. Installed Equipment Capacity Btu/hr 26342 26342 2634 4021 32997 1.43 47186 29510 2nd Fl. Open RHEEM RQKA-0365 1 COINCIDENT 50 % HEATING 38 F COOLING SENSIBLE LATENT PEAK (Jul 5pm) 83 F Btu/hr 30016 30016 3002 377 0 33395 1.21 40408 26063 67 F Btu/hr 311 311 149 460 13163 If Line 3-C > Line 3-8, Explain: _______________ _ FAN POWER CONSUMPTION No. Efficiency Peak Conv Peak Supply Fan Description Sys BHP Motor Drive HP Fact Watts CFM ---------------------------------------------------- Supply Fan 1 X 0.33 I [O .64 X 1 .00] ::::: 0.52 X 746 ::::: 388 1200 ------------------ Totals 0.52 388 1200 FAN POWER DEMAND 388 watts I 1200 cfrn ::::: 0.323 watts/cfrn .. MECHANICAL SIZING AND FAN POWER Project Name: Daily Industrial Building Documentation: DELL co. MECH-2 page 15 of 34 /Date: 9/3/1996 I I :coMPLY 24 User 1712 SIZING AND EQUIPMENT SELECTION HVAC Zone Name: 2nd Fl. Interior/Add. Heating System Name: Cooling System Name: System Multiplier: Peak Load Method: Relative Humidity: 1. DESIGN CONDITIONS FOR Carlsbad 2. SIZING SPACES SERVED BY SYSTEM PEAK Btu/hr --------------------.--------- 2nd Fl. Interior/Add ( Jan 12am) 23646 _......, _____ TOTAL SPACE LOAD 23646 Duct Gains & Losses: 2365 Ventilatioti: ( 269 CFM) 9295 Return Air Lighting Gain ------- TOTAL SYSTEM LOAD 35306 3. SELECTION A. Safety/Warmup Factor 1.43 B. Maximum Adjusted Load 50488 C. Installed Equipment Capacity 47135 RHEEM RJKA-060C HEATING 38 F PEAK ( Jul 6pm) 1 COINCIDENT 50 % COOLING SENSIBLE LATENT 83 F 67 F Btu/hr Btu/hr -------------- 19001 431 -------------- 19001 431 1900 581 344 0 -------------.. - 21482 775 1.21 25993 44722 17209 If Line 3~c > Line 3-B, Explain: ____________ _ FAN POWER CON.SUMPTION No. Efficiency Peak Conv Peak Supply Fan Description Sys BHP . Motor Drive HP Fact Watts CFM ---------------------------------------------------- Supply Fan 1 X 0.75 / [O. 72 X 1 .00] = 1.04 X 746 :::::: 777 2000 ---------------- Totals 1.04 777 2000 FAN POWER DEMAND 777 watts/ 2000 cfm :::::: 0.389 watts/cfm " ' MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SUMMARY Project Name: Daily Industrial Building Documentation: DELL CO. MECH-3 page 16 of 34 /Date: 9/3/1996 I I lCOMPLY 24 User 1712 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- PLANT EQUIPMENT SUMMARY Equipment Name -----------------------Std Gas 50 gal or Less AO SMITH DSE-030 (SE) CENTRAL SYSTEM SUMMARY Sys No System Name Fuel .Elec Total No. Input Input Output Equipment Type Sys ( KBtu) (KW) ( KBtu) -------------------------------_ .. _____ Gas Fired 0 40.0 0.0 31.2 Electric Res 1 0.0 12.0 40.9 No System Type Sys Economizer Type ----------,---~----------------------------1 RHEEM RQKA-0365 2 3 RHEEM RJKA-060C 4 CENTRAL SYSTEM RATINGS Packaged Heat Pu 1 Split Elec-A/C 1 Packaged Heat Pu 1 Split Elec-A/C 1 No Economizer No Economizer No Economizer No Economizer Sys -------Heating ----------------------------------Cooling ----------No Type Output Aux KW EFF Type Output Sensible EER SEER --------------------------------------------------------- 1 H$at Pump 36000 0.0 6.80 DX 36600 25200 9.50 10.00 2 Electric Res 0 n/a 3.41 DX 42000 31900 9.30 10.40 3 Heat Pump 57500 0.0 6.80 DX 57500 43136 9.50 10.00 4 Electric Res 0 n/a 3.41 DX 23000 17600 9.20 10.20 CENTRAL FAN SUMMARY ------------Supply Fan -----------Return Fan Sys Mtr Drv Mtr Drv No Fan Type Motor Location CFM BHP Eff Eff CFM BHP Eff Eff --------------------------------------------------- 1 Constant Volume Draw-Through ·1200 0.33 64 100 None 2 Constant Volume Draw-Through 1400 0.33 64 100 None 3 Constant Volume Draw-Through 2000 0.75 72 100 None 4 Constant Volume Draw-Through 700 0.13 55 100 None ZONAL FAN SUMMARY ---------Zonal Fan ------------Exhaust Fan ----- Mtr Drv Mtr Drv Space Name No CFM BHP Eff Eff No CFM BHP Eff Eff --------------------------------------------- None MECHANICAL VENTILATION Project Name: Daily Industrial Building Documentation: DELL co. MECH-4 page 17 of 34 /Date: 9/3/1996 I I lCOMPLY 24 User 1712 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ VENTILATION SUMMARY BY SPACE Tran Floor sqft CFM Min Design sfer Space Name T Occupancy Area /Occ /Occ CFM CFM CFM ------------------------------------------------ 1st Fl. Lobby/Conf Comp Bldg Offi 614 250 37.5 92 92 ;1st Fl. Break/hall Comp Bldg Offi 758 250 37.5 114 114 2nd Fl. Open Off ice Comp Bldg Offi 777 250 37.5 117 117 2nd Fl. Interior/Add Comp Bldg Offi 1796 250 37.5 269 269 ------ TOTALS 592 592 Note: If Tailored (T=*), user must document sqft/Occ and/or CFM/Occ values. .. HVAC ZONE HEATING & COOLING LOAD SUMMARY page 18 of 34 ______________________ , ___ ------------------------------------------------- Project Name: Daily Industrial Building Documentation: DELL CO. HVAC ZONE DESCRIPTION HVAC Zone Name: Heating System Name: Cooling System Name: System Multiplier: Fan Schedule: Peak Load Method: Relative Humidity: SPACES IN THIS ZONE 1st Fl. Lobby/Conf PEAK (Jan 12am) TOTAL SPACE LOAD Duct Gains & Losses: Ventilation: ( 92 CFM) Return Air Lighting Gain TOTAL SYSTEM LOAD SYSTEM OUTPUT AT DESIGN CONDITIONS HEATING 25935 25935 2594 3178 31707 0 :Date: 9/3/1996 I I /COMPLY 24 User 1712 1st Fl. lobby/conf RHEEM RAKA-024J/RBHA-14 1 All On Load Cales COINCIDENT 50 % COOLING PEAK SENSIBLE -------- (Jul 5pm) 21825 -------- 21825 2182 298 0 LATENT ------ 246 ___ .., ___ 246 117 -------------- 24305 363 18203 6448 NOTE: The TOTAL SYSTEM LOAD shown represents the m1n1mum size equipment which will heat or cool this zone during the design conditions indicated. These numbers include no safety factor, and the HVAC contractor should oversize by a reasonable margin to account for variations in weather conditions and the pick-up capacity required to bring the zone to temper- ature as a result of a setback thermostat. Those responsible for final equipment selection should note that Sensible and Latent Cooling Loads are . indicated to allow for accurate comparison with manufacturer's output data. SPACE HEATING & COOLING LOAD SUMMARY Project Name: Daily Industrial Building Documentation: DELL CO. SUMMARY OF PEAK HOUR LOADS FOR SPACE Space Name: DESIGN CONDITIONS --------------------Peak Hour: Indoor Conditions: Outdoor Conditions: LOAD COMPONENT Quantity ---------------------------------Wall Conduction 486.0 sqft Window Conduction 316.0 sqft Door Conduction 0.0 sqft Roof Conduction 0.0 sqft Skylight Conduction 0.0 sqft Floor Conduction 0.0 sqft Slab Conduction 614.0 sqft Interior Conduction 0.0 sqft Infiltration 0.5 AC/hr Solar Gain 316.0 sqft Lighting 921.0 watts Receptacle 614.0 watts Process 0.0 watts Occupant$ 2.5 occs SPACE LOADS page 19 of 34 1Date: 9/3/1996 I I lCOMPLY 24 User 1712 1st Fl. Lobby/Conf COOLING HEATING SENSIBLE LATENT -------.. ________ ------ Jan 12am Jul 5pm 70 F DB 78 F DB 50 % RH 38 F DB 81 F DB 65 F WB Btu/hr Btu/hr Btu/hr --------------------- 11693 7711 10112 517 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2541 0 0 0 1589 0 0 11469 0 774 0 1048 0 0 0 307 246 .. _______ -------------- 25935 21825 246 Heating AirFlow: Cooling AirFlow: 25935 Btu/hr/ (1.08 x 35 F DeltaT)] = 21825 Btu/hr/ [1.08 x 23 F DeltaT)] = 687 cfm 880 cfm HVAC ZONE HEATING & COOLING LOAD SUMMARY page 20 of 34 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------Project Name: Daily Industrial Building Documentation: DELL co. HVAC ZONE DESCRIPTION HVAC Zone Name: Heating System Name: Cooling System Name: System Multiplier: Fan Schedule: Peak Load Method: Relative Humidity: SPACES IN THIS ZONE 1st Fl. Brea~/hall Warehouse/Manufact. PEAK (Jan 12am) ( Jan 12am) TOTAL SPACE LOAD Duct Gains & Losses: Ventilation: ( 3311 CFM) Return Air Lighting Gain TOTAL SYSTEM LOAD SYSTEM OUTPUT AT DESIGN CONDITIONS HEATING 12574 0 12574 1257 79756 .,. _______ 93587 0 /Date: 9/3/1996 I I lCOMPLY 24 User 1712 1st Fl. Break/Hall RHEEM RAKA-042C/RBHA-21 1 All On Load Cales COINCIDENT 50 % COOLING PEAK SENSIBLE -------- ( Jul 3pm) 9181 ( Jul 3pm) 0 -------- 9181 918 17848 0 -------- 27947 32834 LATENT _____ .. _ 303 0 ------ 303 4223 .. ------ 4526 1:1.739 NOTE: The TOTAL SYSTEM LOAD shown represents the m1n1mum size equipment which will heat or cool this zone during the design conditions indicated. These numbers include no safety factor, and the HVAC contractor should oversize by a reasonabl!e margin to account for variations in weather conditions and the pick-up capacity required to bring the zone to temper- ature as a result of a setback thermostat. Those responsible for final equipment selection should note that Sensible and Latent Cooling Loads are indicated to allow for accurate comparison with manufacturer's output data. SPACE HEATING~ COOLING LOAD SUMMARY Project Name: Daily Indust:rial Building Documentation: DELL co. SUMMARY OF PEAK HOUR LOADS FOR SPACE Space Name: DESIGN CONDITIONS --------------------Peak Hour: Indoor Conditions: Outdoor Conditions: LOAD COMPONENT Quantity ---------------------------------Wall Conduction 715.0 sqft Window Conduction 76.0 sqft Door Conduction 60.0 sqft Roof Conduction 0.0 sqft Skylight Conduction 0.0 sqft Floor Conduction 0.0 sqft Slab Conduction 758.0 sqft Interior Conduction 0.0 sqft Infiltration 0.5 AC/hr Solar Gain 76.0 sqft Lighting 1137.0 watts Receptacle 758.0 watts Process o~o watts Occupants 3.0 occs SPACE LOADS page 21 of 34 /Date: 9/3/1996 I I :coMPLY 24 User 1712 1st Fl. Break/hall COOLING HEATING SENSIBLE LATENT --------------------- Jan 12am Jul 5pm 70 F DB 78 F DB 50 ~ " RH 38 F DB 81 F DB 65 F WB Btu/hr Btu/hr Btu/hr --------------------- 5149 4586 1664 101 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2695 0 1104 0 1962 0 0 2471 0 1078 0 1294 0 0 0 379 303 --------------------- 12574 9909 303 Heating AirFlow: Cooling Airflow: 12574 Btu/hr/ [1.08 x 9909 Btu/hr/ [1.08 x 35 F DeltaT)] = 23 F DeltaT)] = 333 cfm 400 cfm HVAC ZONE HEATING & COOLING LOAD SUMMARY Project Name: Daily Industrial Building Documentation: DELL CO. page 22 of _34 /Date: 9/3/1996 I I lCOMPLY 24 User 1712 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- HVAC ZONE DESCRIPTION HVAC Zone Name: Heating System Name: Cooling System Name: System Multiplier: Fan Schedule: Peak Load .Method: Relative Humidity: SPACES IN THIS ZONE 2nd Fl. Open Office PEAK (Jan 12am) TOTAL SPACE LOAD Duct Gains & Losses: Ventilation: ( 117 CFM) Return Air Lighting Gain TOTAL SYSTEM LOAD SYSTEM OUTPUT AT DESIGN CONDITIONS HEATING 26342 26342 2634 4021 32997 29510 2nd Fl. Open RHEEM RQKA-0365 1 All on Load Cales COINCIDENT 50 % COOLING PEAK SENSIBLE -------- ( Jul 5pm) 30016 -------- 30016 3002 377 0 -------- 33395 26063 LATENT ------ 311 ------ 311 149 ------ 460 13163 NOTE: The TOTAL SYSTEM LOAD shown represents the minimum size equipment which will heat or cool this zone during the design conditions indicated. These numbers include no safety factor, and the HVAC contractor should oversize by a reasonable margin· to account for variations in weather conditions and the pick-up capacity required to bring the zone to temper- ature as a result of a setback thermostat. Those responsible for final equipment selection should note that Sensible and Latent Cooling Loads are indicated to allow for accurate comparison with manufacturer's output data. ,. SPACE HEATING & COOLING LOAD SUMMARY page 23 of 34 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------Project Name: Daily Industrial Building Documentation: DELL CO. SUMMARY OF PEAK HOUR LOADS FOR SPACE Space Name: DESIGN CONDITIONS --------------------Peak Hour: Indoor Conditions: Outdoor Conditions: LOAD COMPONENT Quantity ---------------------------------Wall Conduction 635.0 sqft Window Conduction 240.0 sqft Door Conduction 0.0 sqft Roof Conduction 777.0 sqft Skylight Conduction 0.0 sqft Floor Conduction 64.0 sqft Slab Conduction 0.0 sqft Interior Conduction 0.0 sqft Infiltration 0.5 AC/hr Solar Gain 240.0 sqft Lighting 1165.5 watts Receptacle 777.0 watts Process 0.0 watts Occupants 3.1 occs SPACE LOADS /Date: 9/3/1996 I I :coMPLY 24 User 1712 2nd Fl. Open Office COOLING HEATING SENSIBLE LATENT -------------------.. -- Jan 12am Jul 5pm 70 F DB 78 F DB 50 % RH 38 F· DB 81 F DB 65 F WB Btu/hr Btu/hr Btu/hr --------------------- 15278 13173 7680 521 0 0 1222 1001 0 0 151 31 0 0 0 0 2011 0 0 12349, 0 1226 0 1326 0 0 0 389 311 ---------... ------------ 26342 30016 311 Heating Airflow: Cooling AirFlow: 26342 Btu/hr/ [1.08 x 35 F DeltaT)] = 698 cfm 30016 Btu/hr/ [1.08 x 23 F DeltaT)] = 1210 cfm HVAC ZONE HEATING & COOLING LOAD SUMMARY page 24 of 34 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------Project Name: Daily Industrial Building Documentation: DELL CO. HVAC ZONE DESCRIPTION HVAC Zone Name: Heating System Name: Cooling System Name: System Multiplier: Fan Schedule: Peak Load Method: Relative Humidity: SPACES IN THIS ZONE 2nd Fl. Interior/Add PEAK ( Jan 12am) TOTAL SPACE LOAD Duct Gains & Losses: Ventilation: ( 269 CFM) Return Air Lighting Gain TOTAL SYSTEM LOAD SYSTEM OUTPUT AT DESIGN CONDITIONS HEATING 23646 23646 2365 9295 35306 47135 lDate: 9/3/1996 I I :coMPLY 24 User 1712 2nd Fl. Interior/Add. RHEEM RJKA-060C 1 All On Load Cales COINCIDENT 50 % COOLING PEAK SENSIBLE -------- ( Jul 6pm) 19001 -------- 19001 1900 581 0 -------- 21482 44722 LATENT ------ 431 ------ 431 344 ------ 775 17209 NOTE: The TOTAL SYSTEM LOAD shown represents the m1n1mum size equipment which will heat or cool this zone during the design conditions indicated. These numbers include no safety factor, and the HVAC contractor should oversize by a reasonable margin to account for variations in weather conditions and the pick-up capacity required to bring the zone to temper- ature as a result of a setback thermostat. Those responsible for final equipment selection should note that Sensible and Latent Cooling Loads are indicated to allow for accurate comparison with manufacturer's output data. . .. SPACE HEATING & COOLING LOAD SUMMARY Project Name: Daily Industrial Building Documentation: DELL CO. SUMMARY OF PEAK HOUR LOADS FOR SPACE Space Name: DESIGN CONDITIONS __ .,. ___________________ Peak Hour: Indoor Conditions: Outdoor Conditions: LOAD COMPONENT Quantity ---------------------------------Wall Conduction 2150.0 sqft Window Conduction 180.0 sqft Door Conduction 60.0 sqft Roof Conduction 1796.0 sqft sky light Conduction 0.0 sqft Floor Conduction 0.0 sqft Slab Conduction 0.0 sqft Interior Conduction 0.0 sqft Infiltration 0.5 AC/hr Solar Gain 180.0 sqft Lighting 2694.0 watts Receptacle 1796.0 watts Process 0.0 watts Occupa.nts 7.2 occs SPACE LOADS· page 25 of 34 lDate: 9/3/1996 I I !COMPLY 24 User 1712 2nd Fl. Interior/Add COOLING HEATING SENSIBLE LATENT --------------------- Jan 12am Jul 6pm 70 F DB 78 F DB 50 % RH 38 F DB 80 F DB 64 F WB -Btu/hr Btu/hr Btu/hr --------------------- 11308 9896 0 0 0 0 2824 2106 0 0 0 0 0 0 4866 0 4648 0 0 0 0 4314 0 2145 0 0 0 539 431 --------------------- 23646 19001 431 Heating Airflow: Cooling Airflow: 23646 Btu/hr/ (1.08 x 19001 Btu/hr/ [1.08 x 35 F DeltaT )] :::: 23 F DeltaT)] :::: 627 cfm 766 cfm I RAKA-SERIES Nominal Sizes 1 ½ to 5 Tons { ' ..... _. FORM NO. A11-147 u I CLASSICX® HIGH EFFICIENCY CONDENSING UNITS Seven Models Cooling Capacities 17,000 to 56,500 BTU/HR the Rheem® Classic X High Efficiency RAKA-Condens- ing Unit was designed with performance iri mind. These units offer comfort, energy conservation and dependability for single, multi-family and light commercial applications. the Rheem Classic X RAKA-Condensing Units are the result of an ongoing development program for improved efficiencies. With SEER's ranging to 10.50, these units con- tinue a tradition of high efficiency. • Attractive, louvered wrap-around jacket protects the coil from yard hazards and weather extremes. Top grille is steel reinforced for extra strength. Cabinet is powder painted for all-weather protection. • Air is discharged upward away from bushes and shrubs. The discharge pattern of the top grille provides minimum air restriction, resulting in quiet fan operation. • Exclusive Combination Grille/Motor Mount secures the motor to the underside of the discharge grille. The grille protects the motor windings and bearings from rain and snow. • All controls are accessible by removing one service panel. Removable top grille provides access to the con- denser fan motor and condenser coil. • Single speed motor designed for low speed, quiet, energy-saving operation. **"CERTIFIED UNDER THE A.R.I. CERTIFICATION PROGRAM-A.A.I. STANDARD 210" **575 VOLT MODELS ARE NOT A.R.I. CERTIFIED " FORM NO. H11-509 REV. 1 Supersedes Form No. H11-509 Rev. 0 RBHA-SERIES HEAT PUMP AIR HANDLERS AND· FAN COIL UNIT Features • 1½ through 5 ton models are always just 35 inches tall and 22 inches deep. • Available from factory in upflow, downflow and horizontal configurations. • Versatile 3-way convertible design for upflow, downflow and horizontal. · • All models meet or exceed 400 CFM per ton at .5 inches of external static pressure. • Optional factory or field installed MultiFlex™ coils. • Sturdy double wall construction with .5 inches of dead air space providing thermal and sound insulation. • Permanent, easily accessible and washable filter fur- nished standard. • Circuit breaker (standard on units with more than 10KW) meets U.L. and CSA requirements for service disconnect. • Factory installed auxillary electric heat. Optional 3-30KW provides exacting heat for indoor comfort and electrical requirements. • Watt restrictors, standard on RBHA-14 models above 5KW and on RBHA-17, 21, and 24 models above 10KW, stage supplemental heat so that only the necessary amount is engaged to maintain comfort in the condi- tioned space. "CERTIFIED UNDER THE A.A.I. CERTIFICATION PROGRAM-A.A.I. STANDARDS 210/240-84" ~ Model Identification .. ,t;"> {'t)., . ~I:: . Rheem Blower Type Design Unit Unit Series H=Air Cab. Width ' ~ . .. :. .. f .. Electrical· Designations - ' ;t ':'... ' Electrical Heat (KW) Designation See Electrical Heat Data for Actual KW at 208 Volts. Control Designation Airflow Direction Coil Code Variation from Filter 1--_s_t_an_da_rd _ __, Motor H.P. BlowerCFM Handler 1--1-------+-----------'-+----+----+-----l---i 00= No Heat A=t15V, 1PH,60HZ 03=2.3KW J=208/240V, 1PH, 60HZ 04=3.5KW T=220/240V, 1PH,50HZ 05=4.8KW 14= 14.1KW 15= 14.4KW 16=15.7KW 18= 17.5KW 20=19.2KW 21 =21.0KW 22=21.1KW 23=21.6KW 25=24.0KW 28=28.2KW 30=28.BKW N = No Circuit Breakers Single Supply Circuit S=Circuit Breaker(s) Single Lo/Hi Speed 14 C = 208/240V, 3PH, 60HZ 06 = 5.2KW 17 D = 480V, 3PH, 60HZ 07 = 7.0KW A= W/0 Coil, A= With 21 Y=600V, 3PH, 60HZ 08=7.2KW 24 N = 380/415, 3PH, 50HZ 10 = 9.6KW Supply Circuit M=Circuit Breaker(s) Multi-Supply Circuit With Plenum Filter 14 14.0" 17 17.5" 21 21.0" . 24 24.5" (Som~ D, Y, N Models 11 = 10.5KW Are11'H) 13=14.0KW A J T A J 00* N 00*, 03*, 04*, 05*, 07*, 10* N 03*,04*,05*,07*, 10*,15 s 15 M 00, 04, 07, 11 N 04, 07, 11 s oo· N 00*, 04*, 05*, 07**, 10** N B = RCBA-2453A C = RCBA-2462A D = RCBA-2457A E=RCGA-24A1A F = RCGA-24A2A G=RCHA-24A1A H = RCHA-24A2A 1-04_•_, _o5_*_, 0_1_··_, 1_0_··_, _15"""., _20_-1-__ s_----1u = Upflow 15, 20 M D = 0-Flow 1---------1----------1----~ 00, 04, 07, 11 N L = Horizontal B = RCBA-3670A C = RCBA-3673A D = RCBA-3665A E = RCGA-36A 1A F = RCGA-36A2A G = RCHA-36A 1A T l-'--'--'---------1----S-l Left . 04,07, 11, 13 1-1-3'--'--'-----------!---M--R = Horizontal Right C '--------+-0_1_··_, _10_•_•,_1_5 _____ 1--_N_, s_--1 F = Front A oo· N Upflow oo·, os•, Ol**, {o•• N Connection Options J T 1-0_5•_,_01_·_· ,_1"'"0_··_, 1_5_, _20_, _25_---'1---s----' G = Front 15, 20, 25 M Downflow Connection 00, 07, 11 N Options B = RCBA-487BA 07 11 13 18 S C = RCBA-4882A 1--'-' 'c......;...' -----~e-------1 H = Horizontal D = RCBA-4876A 13, 18 M Left Front E = RCGA-48A1A 07**, 10**, 15 N, S ~~~i~~ction G=RCHA-48A1A C 1--------+2_0.;..., 2_5 _______ -+ __ M_--12= Horizontal 00, 07-1PH, 14, 22·3PH Right Front p y N A J T C D y N Connection 00, 08-1 PH, 15, 23-3PH N Option 00, 06-1PH, 11, 16-3PH oo· N oo·, 05·, 01··, 10·· N 05* ,. 07**, 10**, 15**, 20, 25, 30 s 15**, 20, 25, 30 M 00,07, 11 N 07, 11, 13, 18, 2.1 s 13,18,21 M 07**, 10**, 15** N,S 2'1, 2$, 30 M 00, 07-1PH 14, 22, 28-3PH 00, 08-1PH N 15, 23, 30-3PH 00, 06-1PH 11, 16, 21-3PH B = RCBA-6089A E = RCGA-60A 1A G = RCHA-60A 1A Blower Wheel Dia./Width Filter Size Width/Length Maximum KW Heat- Outdoor Unit Size 1/8 H.P. L0-600 CFM Hl-800 CFM 11.9 x3.81 12.75 X 21 15KW-018 15KW-024 1/4 H.P. L0-1000 CFM Hl-1200 CFM 11.9 X 5.29 16.25 X 21 20KW-030 C = Meets Florida 20KW-036 KW Staging Requirements I = Meets Florida Insulation Requirements F = Meets Both 113 H.P. Florida L0-1400 CFM Requirements Hl-1600 CFM 11.9 X 7.12 19.75 X 21 25KW-042 25KW-048 1/2 H.P. Hl-2000 CFM 11.9 X 9.50 23.25 X 21 30KW-060 NOTES: (1) Coil piston size indicated by last two digits of RCBA-coil model number. (2) Electric heater BTUH = (heater watts+ motor watts) x 3.412 (See airflow table for mot9r watts). (3) Models with BOLD numerals in the electrical heat (kw) column, have watt restrictor and defrost heat controls. (4) Electric heat models with one asterisk "*" meet Florida KW staging requirements. Models with two asterisks "**" require Florida variation to meet code requirements. Models without asterisk(s) are not suitable for use in Florida. Florida staging only available on 208/240 volt, 1-phase and 3-phase units. 3 FORM NO. P11-736 ~HEAT C " . •• RJMA-SERIES HIGH EFFICIENCY RJKA-SERIES STANDARD EFFICIENCY PACKAGE HEAT PUMP EPA POLLUTION PREVENTER ISO '!002 • Ccrtif1ca1e Number; 30164 Nominal· Sizes 3 to 5 Tons [10.6 to 17.6 kW] "CERTIFIED UNDER THE A.A.I. CERTIFICATION PROGRAM-AR.I. STANDARD 240" 0) PERFORMANCE DATA PACKAGE HEAT PUMP-HIGH EFFICIENCY 'l;I~"l!t~Jigli.@·PirJij_fmfili~t'.::,~·'(,:{X~·{ ;)!:·21;~~1i:t~;f//'..~~; L :; : .. :,:·. ~' :J ., '.'.:-";·; '.: :: Aijl~ij~_~lljiijj_P.e~ggriij~C:aJ10~Fl21°Cf:l~~jiijj:>_M):;1:; -\t :,\,'.('; : ' ' >' ' i· · ... ~-:-·"-Cooling Capacity--, .. --Outdoor Air .-·:c>· .. •• ,: Outdoor Air .. 'J </ MNo_~,.I :· • . " . .: .. ··:·;/~~r,~r1;;~;1:~,~6;i:?F~;.;i;~i1~~;~!.f'.;.'/·:",,· . . ;· :>:' \ •. i·'\.':{i; ::t[~~t~!;~~r:",. >:>~/!: )~-i-'.i.tlL.t.~~~:;~r:: ~'f-?ti t:yD_Q1.~a-' ·, ,.,po~ , '., · '' ,o... ... . : · · · ' '> ·: · .,. . , .. · 1·Deilgli•Ciindllllins .c,, ," ';' ,,,. ',, '·. •. · · JF--., . ', .. s •. ,,..-,,.:DdE HljjliTeinp ' . ''' ... · . '· ' ,,...,, DOE tow•1{'emji• •' > · t" . .: .. · Reg on ', •Region : :<\ .~a~~~;::";-, , ~ , ,,_ '. -:.1: ·,\ .-~ · ./ .:i.t:-,-:';, --~ .. : ~\-J,'~ :.~·.; ~\~~,-~v;· :/,:.--:~~;:-~-:;,~:·::::·::~:f~~\-5:::J:<~~ .· ~ ·i_'.::::~.::>::· · :::.:: ... 1,~, ·t.:;. 1;, ;: \ •• : ,.·.· ·.::,: ·;·~:~~:~:;:·;\~;~~~?:,.~: . ·:-,: :{·: r ~,':.:/:.in\:{}··.'.": ·t~\ ~: :,·.[ , ::\~;~ .: .. ;;._( -~'~.-~ · ~:,::t):,:,:~~~, ::·,~, ~ i~ '.};JV/<~_:: i-:/.;1,Jf ~ · ':··,;;.-'' . '•, ,. ' cl3litir·t ::i:;XNtli~~&ttit: ;i~J':~ettai~,~L:,;:, /'.~~~r ;j;~~~f.!. ~ 7"1i!C~f: j '.,' ·jij~9.pt,: t: i\!J1tiMifkW1 '.:! t'.;T~'~F: <'t~~:.; / :.:~1Unf :fliwf,/i: !:}rijiM-·.; ~: cti~,:; r \ffS,_f\: :"·;~~p~ . / ; · .. ·:,, ·::::-itV./iN~w1(':1 >}B,! · ~~l, W,1>:i\ {~~l~ttJ~~'?;· \\J<Y' .):-;:::, ;: \ij~\Jniirg?,:~: {'.~f.~jJ~s!i;! ;~ >~~~!~::.:~\/:;;;;,,, ;:,-W~:":!jJ liti::'.:{/ ;:;:;;ii. ···.:; ·:::b,) :: ,::;,~~f i ii? / ;L :'.:.{ ::.:_': \ .. ,' . :, A036CK/CUDUJK/YL 36,000 [10.56] 26,703 (7.80] 9,297 [2.76] 11.00 12.10 83.0 1200 (565] 36,000 [10.56] 3296 3.20 21,000 [6.18] 3076 2.00 7.20 6.20 : . AQ4~Q!</PldQt/JKJ,Y~ . •; ~Ql990l1 t@}:··f '; ~9;468, '._,[~18?L · · ,;,ji73~ ,[~;??] ,:', :,:I.Qi§5'i:· :A ?t1 Q(i, r:-.. ~?,Q\i.> <;t~QQ([Q§OJ;; ,:,<~g;OQQ,(;j ?'..?Q];,~: :: J~2~ (. ::::.?;~{: ::. 4~1ZQQJ.~(,'li~ev; /,3~1 Q-'.:,; :::..t;1 O,:;'-'. ; ;:,,: 7;?0.\.,: .:, •fW .. A048CK/CUDUJK/YL 48,000 [14.10] 35,442 [10.38] · 12,558 (3.72] 10.80 12.10 83.0 1600 [755] 48,000 [14.10] 4262 3.30 27,400 [8.04] 3860 2.08 7.20 6.00 ·:Ao6ocuouJLJYt .. · · · 60,000 .1.7,55 : · ,44:o.u :t2;90, ··: :15,926: i\:65: . "·1m.so. :; : ·.12,10. :,, :::':38.aio:_,,;:;:, 1,2_000, Q45 ::,· i:.:lmioo.o ~,7.-;55 <: ··,.,:51l:t. r; ;:,a~4o.\ i;_a5iooo. 10,2a 1:; ·. \.t:7.4J._:j •.. 2,1:a:·i ... :,1.20 i-. -: -:6.oo. © Sound rating in dB In accordance with ARI Standard 270. PERFORMANCE DATA PACKAGE HEAT PUMP-STANDARD EFFICIENCY .. ·~----· ::: ~:~--_-:, : ··_:. , ~r.· .. _ :· -_ . . .ARtco~nijd·feriifrmanci, ·. : · ~--: _ , ·, 7~ -: :,,_:·:_··· _ . A~1·H~~t1na,P.e~iirn:l4iii:e,(7D~.FJ?l~c1.1ndoilr Jm·>-::-\ :~ : . . .. . . '' . -;_ :i >=... ·,-;i :,' ·' ·i'j?-::i:.h~?;'-(:{<·i' -~ _;:' ;.:,,;l:~tO!P~~ap,.~itt:·, ,,;?: /,·: /:;? .-.. -; ., .:··· ~i ), .; ~ /(-.:-'.\Qii.id_iigt:,Jr/./:·:,·:·:t,-1 :'.;)_::t,. ;Q~(ijqiir11t; .. :·:'\':;· :.f ''.:?,.:'j' :,:l':L' :: ·, :·· ,M .. d,..il~:.-'.·.· ;,-.. ·,·.'· -·~'; .. ,;·; .. , '..'>lndoor·Alr80.F:[2&i5CJDB/67F[19;5CJ\AIB:,.-·· ,.· .. ,,,.,: ... ,.,,_;··.·. ,,_1"_.,, A7:F:DB/43.,f:WBc.··.·.c--·:.;_:.<:<;. :,., 1:fliF,:DBJi5.fiWB·::.~. ·,..'· ..,,.,,.·:· · ,.,,:.• '· o a .·. ·.' .,--· l. ,.. ,.,,_., ._,.·.\:?-·':,. /··:,-; · .,-.. ,: ,c-,:o· 'ut'ai .,. ·A· i•:9·5•f· ·c3·5 ,,o··c· ·1·0·1 .': '· '-' ,,,,,':': r ., .... ,·< · 1 • -·,: \'. ,r -· ·,. ·i-::,.,.t:;.,,.,;· ... ,-'.ta· ·'5•c•;o·'~c·'"1;, :, ''i , .. :;,; ,,,,,:c ~,, ... ·.: .,.-.,.: . .,'..5· •c··.;M:-5•r.1~~,:--'.,. •;:t_.;; '' DOE · .. -. ;, 'DOE ) No:,." .-~\'. ,,· t,,',v,:\,~, ,,'l,(', ,~\ ,. ~11p,.,vr,.,,·.: ,. ', ,, -~l':'-(,::,',1•:.'',\-;}f,f'r';(",:,",,: ... \··-~t·:'-·r 1V';')'1f1'F,~:•,1,'1->'/,'/·.\· ~--,,-,,, --~ .. '-r,:Jt·:-:·~~l;J,·~--~t,,v;'~,Hr1?t;'tl~•,i,,.~,JJr:4i.~·:~-;'l,'.1!1-R;~·,o ·;.c,-,fi',1,r·-·' . ·.·.'·.··t',\• •• ·,' :;~i~ii :.·i~~~· / ,;;~~~•.••::i· {:if©\ ;:]~1r( :{;S~"r;j .. :,~:;.;~;r;;r:;;~J 1\i~T,;:~; A036CK/CUDUJK/YL 36,000 10.56] 26,587 [7.801 9,413 (2.76] 9.60 · 10.25 83.0 1200 (565] 37,000 10.86]' 3566 3.04 21,600 [6.36 ·3196 1.98 6.80 5.90 "AD42CK/CUDt1JK/YL. : 40;500· 1,1,85. , 30,2.68. [8;881 . , 10,232 f2'.97. '. . : !PD· '.· 10:00,: .. · 8~:0.' ·. ·· 1400f660l-:42;5po 12.45 4144 .. 3.()!1 ::_24i80{l,17.26 . ,:3533 :. , 2:00 .. : -6,80 , :· 5,90- A048CK/CUQUJK/YL 47,000 13.80 35,594 [10.44] 11,406 [3.36 9.20 10.50 83.0 1600 [755]. 48,500 ·14.25 4487 3.20 28,400 [8.34 3879 . 2.14 6:90 6.20 A060CUDUJL./YL 57,500 16:80 .. · . 43;136.:112.601. 14,364 (4.20:. '. 9,50 ,;10.00-' ... 8,3;0 .' · ... 2000'194.51' . 57i500: 16:80 . 5491 -.. 3J)4 . .-34,0®J9:96 · 4875 _· . ,·2;Q.f : :618P•: · :5.90 © Sound rating In dB in accordance with ARI Standard 270. [ ] Designates Metric Conversions ., ',l\,1 .. ~-.) .., j ~/ R t!" if ,t,. __ (. ~ FORM NO. P11-734 . . HEAT PUMPS ISO '/002 10 SEER PACKAGE HEAT-PUMP RQKA-SERIES Nominal Sizes 11 /2 to 3 Tons [5 to 10.6 kW] "CERTIFIED UNDER THE A.A.I. CERTIFICATION PROGRAM-A.A.I. STANDARD 240" .i,. PERFORMANCE DATA-PACKAGE HEAT PUMP-10 SEER <D EER data is generated independent of an ARI certification program. @ Sound rating in accordance with ARI Standard 270. ELECTRICAL AND PHYSICAL DATA-PACKAGE HEAT PUMP-10 SEER ;~~: ~i~j~~J 1l1~j~~r :i~~!;:~!111~1~~) i ) Designates Metric Conversions ~ ... ~ . -'::.., . ' ' ' ~-: · ... ::;){· . .. . , .. (_, ,', ,, 1 ,.,:,' ',',_.,,.· .j ,t>1 l, " ",',if).,}i{i;,;',',;iri·1··'Yj\r•,;.,i);;iV?~"-,, .. fM ,j:'I '''·'Tifilii" ,,.,y,-. ":5"'.,u··jc':\\, .,'1{',:-~~;~~l~i~ · .. ',); -r:}~1_;:·;;~r,{'.t:i~:1~<;;. ~h~ 1~P"tP"[i:1{,;' ~,·:,'/ :;i,,. '. :;~.: f ( ~J ~ ,.._::.,_~---· SEE MORE , REVISIONS SCANNED SEPARATELY