The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1979 PALOMAR OAKS WAY; ; CB951636; Permit64 12 SN B U I L D I N G P. E R M I T Permit No:. CB951636 01/25/96 09:33 - . . •. . Project No: A9502395 Pa' e' lof i- . . .-, Development:No: Job '4 r r 7 T t,17 T OAKS c 7'J • • . jj tuLreS S. .LI -.ULfl LZ VV i - . Suite : e. JT '9 (f' ( Permit Type INDUSTRIAL TENANT IMPROVEMENT '' ' " C--N 7721-1 -'-' I'/' Parcel No: 213-092-21-00 . .Lot#:. . .d,' Valution: 4500`000 . . • . Construction Type: VN Occupancy Group: B2, .. Reference#: .. Status: ISSUED, Description: 17,350 SFITI+1685 NEW WAREHS+ . . Applied: 1I/08/95 1075 .NEW STORAGE-SCHUMACHER , . . . ..Apr/Issue:.01/25/96 • . . . . '. .'. Entered,By: RMA Appl/Ownr : BALDWIN, KENNON, . 61-9-231--,0751- . 701 B STREET, STE 200 . . . . .. SAN DIEGO, CA 92101 '- •:: *** Fees Required *** Fes CoIcted & Credits ------------------------------.' -------------------- . Fees: 8,921.i0t2\c it 1H;\ . . Adjustments /00 \ 00 Total Fees 8,911 / 7 1,200 00 B lance \u.4\ 7,721.00 Fee desciption 'I I 'IJhits FeJn..it \ Ext fee Data - --------------------- L----.- _---------------- ftg Pe Plan Check Strong :1:ee L ( \ " Enter Number of EDU' - atEk red1fr : / •'ffl. 1320.00 -. (iceñse . 1205.00 (tic T x CFDf un ?F~un 177.00 1113.00 (TCFEEh\') INCORPORATED 163.00 Enter Bridge Fee 1912- 2O.Oç . 220.00 41 1 Enter Park Fee(Zone 5,13> 6) 4 1104.00k 05 * BUILDING TOTAL .d, it'/3r;;—A1c; 'f_ '8474.00- . Enter fly' for Plumbing Issue ee 20.00, Y Each,4Plumbing Fixture, or Trap 7.00 35.00 Each Roof Drain , .' . - 7.00 21.00 - Each Install/Repair Water Line >. , - '1 .7.00 - -7.00 Each Water Heater and/or Vent • > -. -,7.00 . , 28.00 . - Gas Piping System . ' ' > . • 1-7.00 . 7.00 * PLUMBING TOTAL . . . ' 118.00 Enter "Y " for Electric Issue Fee > ' - • . 10.00 Y .. Remodel/Alter Per AMP . - > . 80 .' .25 - 200.00 . * ELECTRICAL TOTAL . . .' ... 210.001 Enter 'Y' for Mechanical Issue Fee> - 15.001Y Install Furn/Ducts/Heat Pumps > 5 -9.00 45.00'. Each Exhaus Fan . . > - •.. 8 -. 6. 50 52.00 Each Hood - > - i . . 6'. 50 6.50 * MECHANICAL TOTAL , . - - -. ' 119.00 -- - •-. 1NSPJ' - ICLEARANCE- -;-, -, -CITY OF CARLSBAD 4 2075 Las Palma;Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 PERMIT APPLICATION City of Carlsbad Buitding Department 2075 Las Patinas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 1. PERMiT TYPE From List I (see back) give code of Permit-Type: 61 I --------------------------------------------------------- For Residential Projects Only: From List 2 (see back) give Code of Structure-Type: PLAN CHECK NO. 4576 11/08/95 0001 01 02 C-PRi1T 1200 00 Net Loss/Gain of Dwelling Units PROJECT INFORMATION FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Address /'77'f/'RWijff W,0111 Building or Suite No. J17 Nearest Cross Street Piu'm1i 1qii2/i- D. c c.-t 1) M4C4- LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot NO. Subdivision Name/Number Unit No. Phase No. IjLLLJW ir SUISMII iw: 2 Energy Calcs OStructural Calcs 'Soi1s Report MI Addressed Envelope ASSESSOR'S PARCEL EXISTING USE PROPOSED USE DESCRIPTION OF WORK --T t 7 .35b Jri!-J- -( j,--- wMcjfovs * SQ. Fr. 1704110 # OF STORIES '2— # OF BEDROOMS # OF BATHROOMS UJN LAL1 PERSON (ii different from applicant) NAME (last,name first) /24f f'/-f/j./p ADDRESS 701 F' "'t5ET 'iT.ZCC CITY PIO STATE ZIP CODE T. Z 10! DAY TE)EPHONE (P101 2 1- -( AI'PLIGANT _=N D AGENT FOR CON HACIOR ErOWN= 10 AGENT FOR OWNER NAME (last name first) M0b04'/m.owlN flgCIIDDRESS lot ? 7r, rezc'o CITY 4'kW Oio STATE cA ZIP CODE '7 210( DAY TELEPHONE ' ('1 S. PROPERTY OWNER NAME (last name first) hUPC7tfev' ADDRESS I'1(7 PA-i.'o,l'lftlt OAfts. Wt CITY C/LPIflV STATE ZIP CODE DAY TELEPHONE ((,i) CONTRACTOR ADDRESS NfNE gp mv V NAME (last name first) ØfN 4fl?%J CITY 'jtI Oi&o STATE 44 ZIP CODE 121/1 DAY TELEPHONE 40/1 21Z 5550 STATE UC. # 4,01761 LICENSE CLASS CITY BUSINESS UC. # 222 tOo DESIGNER NAME (last name first) g%j,pjq, 1J, ADDRESS 761 F5, -, -s zoO CITY '7P1W P1(72 STATE ft ZIP CODE '77401 DAY TELEPHONE 61ff 2.3(-o75STATE LIC. # e IO3P2_ WORKERS' COMPENSATION V Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm that I have a certificate of consent to self-insure issued by the Director of Industrial V Relations, or a certificate of Workers' Compensation Insurance by an admitted insurer, or an exact copy or duplicate thereof certified by the Director of the insurer thereof filed with the Building Inspection Department (Section 3800, Lab. Q. INSURANCE COMPANY 4FD1 tja 0 POLiCY NO.W%14 EXPIRATION DATE 17,1151 1 % Certificate of Exemption: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. SIGNATURE DATE OWNER-BUILDER DECL4RA11ON Owner-Builder Declaration: I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractors License Law for the following reason: o - I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale.). 0 1, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). E3 I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason: (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish, or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License law (Chapter 9, commencing with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars [$5001). IGNAi Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 255, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? DYES 19 NO Is the applicant or future building occupft required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? DYES 'NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? DYES - NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED AFTER JULY 1, 1989 UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DIS11UCF. ereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance or the work for which this permit is issued (Sec 3091(i) Uvil Lode). LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS 10. APPLICANT CEK1IFR.I1ON I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the City of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID QTY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. Expiration. Every permit issued by the Building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 365 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is commenced for a period of 180 days (Section 303(d) Uniform Building Code). cAPPHCANT'S-SIGNATURE-%MATE: WHITE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK Finance - - • U U - L44 3 U U SEWER PERMIT U 01/25/96 09:32 ..-- - . . Permit No: 5E960007 Page 1 o 1 U U '. Bldg PlanCk#: CB951-636 ,Job Address: 1979 PALOMAR OAKS WY - Suite: -ocoi U ' U U 5707 O1/2'9, Permit Type SEWER - OFFICE/WAREHOUSE -PRMT 1035 -00; I Parcel No: 213-092-21-00 U IU U U !i U Description: 'WARHEHOIJSE .& OFFICE U . . . . Status: ISSUED U UU SEWER PERMIT . . r U Applied:, 01/09/96 1 U . U Apr/Issue: 01/25/96 Permitee: BALDWIN, KENNON U 619_U231_0751 U • Expired: U 701 B STREET1 STE 200 .. Prepared By: MAN U SAN DIEGO, CA 92101 . U• U Fees Required U U U *U**Y 5 C Ictd & Credits Fees: 1,03555. I I Fee description S. it Ext fee,, Da-6!a'; Total EDUs" 55 Sev~er.,Fee 993.00 Enter Warehouse Squa e. e .55 Enter Sewer EDUs and 5 1- Area .55 42,.00Gk'. SEWER TOTAL 1035 .00 INCORPORATED 1952 J CITY OF CARLSBAD . U U U U U 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (619)438-1161 .; CITY OF CARLSBAD -INSPECTION.-REQUEST, PERMIT# CB951636 FOR .06/20/96g. INSPECTOR AREA TP DESCRIPTION 17,350 SF ITI+1685 NEW WAREHS+ PLANCK# CB951636 1075 NEW STORAGE-SCHUMACHER, H 0CC GRP B2 TYPE: ITI CONSTR. TYPE VN JOB ADDRESS 1979 PALOMAR OAKS WY STE LOT APPLICANT: BALDWIN, KENNON PHONE: 619-231-0751 CONTRACTOR: PHONE: OWNER PHONE REMARKS: MW/STEVE/603-0840 INSPECTOR SPECIAL INSTRUCT: TOTAL TIME --RELATED PERMITS-- PERMIT# TYPE STATUS - SE900159 SWOW ISSUED CB941027 ITI EXPIRED SE960007 1 SWOW ISSUED AS960019 ASC ISSUED FA960007 FALARM ISSUED CD LVL DESCRIPTION ACT COMMENTS 19 ST Final Structural 29 PL Final Plumbing 39 'EL Final Electrical 49 ME Final Mechanical *** INSPECTION, HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION ACT INSP COMMENTS 052196 Final Combo ICO TP OK TO OCCUPY MINOR CORR 052 096'Final Combo. . CA TP 051796 Final Combo NR PK RESET FOR MONDAY- 050996 Const. Service/Agricultural AP TP TSPB TEST METER 050896 Final Electrical NR TP SEO/ND GFI TEST 050796 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding AP TP T-BAR COMPLETE 050796 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding AP TP - SKY LITE FRAME 050796 Rough Electric AP TP CEILING LITES 050796 Rough/Ducts/Dampers. AP TP 042996 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding AP TP T-BAR GRID N-C LIN 042996 Rough Electric AP TP CElL LITES N-C LINE 042996 Rough/Ducts/Dampers AP TP DUCTS NC LINE 041096 Interior. Lath/Drywall AP TP :• - 040496 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding AP TP - - 040496 Interior Lath/Drywall PA TP . .' 040496 Rough Electric - AP TP 'l WALLS • . • • 040496 Roof/Reroof - AP TP • - - 040496 Rough/Topout - AP TP EXST REST. T24 ROUGH 040396 Roof)'Reroof. • CO TP . 040296 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding . PA TP 1HR CORR ASMB ' 040296 Insulation - .. AP TP • • , • • 040296 Exterior Lath/Drywall AP TP • WHSE #133 • I- - FILE No. 429 05/21 '96 08:48 ID:CTE ESCONDIDO 619 746 9495 . PAGE 2 CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGMERINGI,.Iè EsCOM)mo • MODESTO . - CORONA z • OXNARD • LANCASTER - RENTON 2414 V1NYAD St, 0 3WAKDALa PA A2 490E PWNCEIANDC9I I645PMPC AVE #105 42156 I MOT, •. UNIT k 7356W.41*ST. ESCOr4DIOO. CA 91079 MODEM. CA 95357 CORONA. CA 91719 O(AR). CA 93033 LANCASTER. CA 93534 M$04mN, WA9ö5 69l 1464955 (209) 551-2271 (905) 311.1890 (905) 436-6415 (189)776.9573 ) 656-1266 VAX (49) 746_906 vx (7189) 351.3590 VAX (p89) 171-2195 - Vu (189)436.9016 9x (102) 726-9676 VAx (2) 653-1295 *ay 17, 1996 - CTE Job No. 10-1632 City Of'Carlsbad Building Inspection Department 2075 Las Palmas - Carlsbad, CA 92009 , • - SUBJECTS SATISFACTORY . COMPLETION OF WORK REQUIRING - SPECIAL INSPECTION PERPORNED UNDER PERMIT NO. PtAN FILE NO.; N/A BUILDING PERMIT NO.: - 95-1636 - ADDRESS: 1969, Palomar Oaks Wy • , • - - - Carlsbad, CA 92009 - - ' • Director of Building Inspections , - To the best of my knowledge all work requiring special . Inspection, Reinforced Concrete,Field welding,Epozy - - -- Anchor Bolts, construction observation or off-site - fabrication for the structure constructed under. the subject permit is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the applicable workmanship provisions of ,the Uniform Building Code.:' Print/Type Name: Rodney D. Ballard Title: • , Civil Engineer - Signature: .•• -•••••• ••• - - CEOTECIINICAL AND CoNSTRUcTION ENGINEERING TESTING AND INSPECTION 0 -, • ENGINEERING, INC CONQi RUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. ESCONDIDO • MODESTO • CORONA • OXNARD • LANCASTER • RENTON 2414 VINEYARD Ste G 3540 OAXDALE RD Ste A2 490 E PRINCELANDCT #7 1645 PACIFIC AVE #105 42156 10th ST. W, UNIT IC 235 SW 4IST. ESCONDIDO, CA 92029 MODEM, CA 95357 CORONA, CA 91719 OXNARD, CA 93033 LANCASThR, CA 93534 RENIDN, WA 98055 (619) 746-4955 (209) 551-2271 (909) 371-1890 (805) 486-6475 (805)726-9676 (206) 656-1266 FAX (619) 746-9806 FAX (209) 551-3593 c-AX (909) 371-2160 FAX (805) 486-9016 FAX (702) 726-9676 FAX (206) 656-1265 REPORT OF COMPRESSION TESTS PROJECT: SCHUMACHERt979PALOMAROAKS PROJECT NO.: 101632 PROJECT ADDRESS: CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA TO BE BILLED: C/O KOLL CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR: KOLL CONSTRUCTION BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 95-1636 ARCHITECT/ENGINEER: TODD HELSETHJSCHUMACHER PLAN FILE NO.: SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF:CONCRETE _MORTAR _GROUT —OTHER SUPPLIER: - - ESCONDIDO READY MIX PLACEMENT DATE: 2-27-96 MIX DESCRIPTION: 5.5 SK W/ROCK TICKET NUMBER: 1453044 MIX NUMBER: 355 P TIME IN MIXER: --- SLUMP: 5" ADMIXTURE: --- TYPE CEMENT: II AIR CONTENT: -- CONC. TEMP.: 72" AMB 75° DESIGN STRENGTH: 3000 PSI LOCATION OF PLACEMENT: TOP HALF OF LARGEST-FTG .1 ,, . •.'t-,_ .- .r. -. - SPECIAL TEST INSTRUCTION OR REMARKS 1 7 2 28 c - REQUIRED STRENGTH (F C)_3000 PSI AT 28 DAYS - SAMPLES MADE BY: - CTE ALVIN WALTER DATE REC'D IN LAB: LABORATORY DATA AGE Lab Control Number Date Tested Dimensions Inches Test Area SQ Inches Max Load - Pounds Compressive Strength PSI 2 A, 3-5 6 X 12 - 28.27 103500 . 3660 B 3-26 6-X 12 28.27 151500 5360, - C 3-26 6 X 12 28.27 152000 , 5380 / REVIEWED BY: DATE:4/2/ All sampling an teting.cànd ted in acc ance with ASTM Standard Designations C31-91. C39-86. C138-92, C143-90, C172-90. C173-93, C23 -91b. C47093a, C5II-92. C617-87. ClOT' ,,C1231, E4-93. EI71-87 CONFOR'4S NO D,1ST,RIBUTION: 1) TODD I-IELSETH/SCHUMACHER LIKOLL CONSTRUCTION c.ITXZCRLTS 1)DISK 96 G(101632.2) - - GEOTECHNICAL AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING TESTING AND INSPECTION ENGINEERING, INC NSTRUCTION TES'T'ING & ENGINEERING. INC. ESCONDIDO • MODESTO • CORONA • OXNARD • LANCASTER • RENTON 2414 VINEYARD Ste G 3540 OAKDALE RI) Ste A2 490 E PRINCELAND Cr #7 1645 PACIFIC AVE #105 42156 10th ST. W, UNrF K 235 SW 4lgST. ESCONDIDO, CA 92029 MODESTO, CA 95357 CORONA, CA 91719 OXNARD, CA 93033 LANCASTER, CA 93534 RENTON, WA 98055 (619) 746-4955 (209) 551-2271 (909) 371-1890 (805) 486-6475 (805)726-9676 (206) 656-1266 FAX (619) 746.98116 FAx (209) 551.3593 FAX (909) 371.2168 FAX (805) 486-9016 FAX (702) 726-9676 PAx (206) 656-1265 - REPORT OF COMPRESSION TESTS - PROJECT SCHUMACHEIfl979 PALOMAR OAKS WA PROJECT NO 10162 PROJECT ADDRESS: CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA TO BE BILLED: C/O KOLL CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR: KOLL CONSTRUCTION - ARCHITECT/ENGINEER: TODD HELSETH/SCHTJMACHER BUILDING PERMIT NO.: PLAN FILE NO.: SAMPLE DATA ' . REPORT OF: CONCRETE MORTAR.. GROUT OTHER SUPPLIER: ESCONDIDO READY MIX PLACEMENT DATE: 2-23-96' MIX DESCRIPTION: --- - . TICKET NUMBER: 1452457 MIX NUMBER: 355 P1 - TIME IN MIXER: 50 MIN. SLUMP: 35" ADMIXTURE: TYPE CEMENT: II AIR CONTENT: -- CONC. TEMP.: 86" DESIGN STRENGTH: 3000 PSI • LOCATION OF PLACEMENT: G & H FOOTINGS SPECIAL TEST INSTRUCTION OR REMARKS I 7.2 a 28 1. . REQUIRED STRENGTH (F C)3000 PSI AT 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY: CTE PHIL DATE REC-D IN LAB: - LABORATORY DATA AGE Lab Control Number Date Tested Dimensions Inches Test Area SQ Inches Max Load Pounds Compressive Strength PSI l.A , 3-1 . 6 X 12 28:27 85000 3005 B 3-22 6X 12 28.27 134000 4740 C 3-22 6 X 12 28.27 137000 4850 REVIEWED BY: ?//7'C 2/Vij\.- DATE:___________ All sampling and testing co uctedih ac'L'e with ASTM Standard Designations C31-91. C39-86., C138-92, C143-90, C172-90, C173-93, C231- lb. C470-93a. C511-92. C617-87. C1077-92, C1231, E4-93,E171-87. - CONFORMS: '. . • - NO DISTRTBUTION TODD HELSETH/SCHLvRCHER I)KOLL CONSTRUCTION 11OFARLSB\D 1)FILE 96 G(I01632 GEOTECHNICAL AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING TESTING AND INSPECTION / \ CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. ESCONDIDO • MODESTO • CORONA • OXNARD • LANCASTER • RENT ON 24I4VINEYARfl Ste G 35400A1CDALERfl Ste A2 490EPRXNCELANDCE#7 I645PACIFICAVE#105 42156 I0th ST. W.UNTFK 235 SW. 41gST. (1 ESCONDIDO, CA 92029 MODESTO, CA 95357 CORONA, CA 91719 OXNARD, CA 93033 LANCASTER, CA 93534 RENTON,WA 98055 (619) 746-4955 (209) 551-2271 (909) 371-1890 (805) 486-6475 - (805)726-9676 - (206) 6564 ENGINEERING, INC. FAX (619) 746-9806 FAX (209) 551-3593 FAX (909) 371-2168 FAX (805) 486-9016 Ffr.x (702) 726-9676 FAX (206) 656-1265 -- - REPORT OF COMPRESSION TESTS PROJECT SCHUMACHER 1979 PALOMAR OAKS WAY PROJECT NO 101632 PROJECT ADDRESS CARLSBAD CALIFORNIA TO BE BILLED ' C/O KOLL CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR: KOLL CONSTRUCTION • ARCHITECT/ENGINEER: TODD HELSETH/SCHUMACHER BUILDING PERMIT NO.: - - PLAN FILE NO.: - SAMPLE, DATA * . - - - REPORT OF:X CONCRETE MORTAR -GROUT OTHER.---- •.- - - - - - 4 - - SUPPLIER: 'ESCONDIDO READY MIX PLACEMENT DATE: 3-7-96 -. F MIX DESCRIPTION: 7SK & POZZ 318' PUMP MIX TICKET NUMBER: - 1453788 MIX NUMBER: 67P TIME IN MIXER: 86 MIN. SLUMP: 4° ADMIXTURE: POZZ - * TYPE CEMENT: II - -" AIR TEMP.: 69° * CONC. TEMP.: 76° DESIGN STRENGTH: .3000 PSI Z.7 LOCATION OF PLACEMENT: FOO NG AT D. Ill. ------------------ .........._5_ -,t " .___-, - --,__.. ___) ,•--,- - S -- - SPECIAL TEST INSTRUCTION OR REMARKS 1 72 28 1 HOLD REQUIRED STRENGTH (F C) 3000 PSI AT 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY: CTE DAN MATSON DATE REC'D IN LAB: - -. -. - LABORATORY DATA AGE Lab Control Number Date Tested ° - Dimensions Inches Test Area SQ Inches Max Loa'd Pounds Compressive Strength PSI 3 A - 3-14 6 X 12 28:27.,. 82500 - 2920 -- , B " 44 - 6 X 12. 28.27 130000 4600 - C 44 • 6 X 12 28.27 128000 4530 -. HOLD Ds - REVIEWED BY: - - - •. - - . . DATE:4//196 All sàmpling°aiid titing nducté&'frftordance with ASTM-Standard Designations C31-91, C39-86, C138-92, C143-90, C172-90, C173-9 , C23 -91b. C470-93a, C511-92, C617-87, C1 -' 7)2, C1231,E4931 E171-87 CONFORMS: YES NO DISTRIBUTION: 1) TODD HELSETH/SCHUMACHER l)KOLL CONSTRUCTION IHCITY.OFcARLSBAD I)COMPDISK 101632;3 .1 •: , - * ' * GEOTECHNICAL AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING TESTING AND INSPECTION - -' — — CONSTRUCTION TETING & ENGINEERING, . 0.1 ESCONDIDO. MODESTO • CORONA • OXNARD ° RENO • SEATTLE 'o LAS VEGAS ENGINEERING INC INSPECTION REPORT PAGE /OF / GTE JOB t — / REPORT/t PROJECT NAME NSPECflO\ fIATERLkL 1DENTW1CATION ADDRESS //11 11',;-. (ONCRETE CONE Psi AM ( ) MASONRY UN IIXE 151 ARCHITECT ( ) PT ( ONC IOR1 AR 1Y - IS! ENGiNEER-....... - - - - - - / ( )EIELD\\ELD RER\R(RADE CONTRACTOR: .-. . ;- - - .. - )SH()L \[I DINO SIR S-1 EEL INSPETIONA DTE: - . - PILF DRIINO ITS BOLE A. PLAN F1 ( ) B\ I CH PLANT \TS F311_0( K BLDG PERMIT: -. -.,. .. . . .. FXP ANCHOR El EC I ROW` OTHER MaterialSampling (aCONCRETE --(- ) MORTAR ()GROUT' ...).FIREPROOFING (.)MASONR.Y BLOCK- ( )REBAR ( ) STRUCTURAL STEEL ( ) BOLTS Lim ---- ,--. - .- . - ..-- . .• . - .-.-- - •- -- . ... __PROGRESS_ KS_WORREJECTEDREMA___-:9 - -- - - — - - - — -- _4 --,- -- — - - - 41 -': (iAe b cJ cA111kCteV I -jtj.,--'I Ill 31 ii. .• . - - . - - - : .- - -. .. - . -t - NAME___(PRINT)\__ SIGNATURE CERTIFICATION NO STh11 4 GEOTECHMCAL-& CONSTRUCnONL ENGINEERING TESTING & INSPECTION' -T-' - - . -, . . •,- ... - '. . . --.-'-----' -............ - 2414 VINEYARD AVENUE SUITE G ESCONDIDO CA 92029:(619)-746-4955 FAX (619) 746 9806 - s' . - -'-: - . -.- - --.- ,-- - ,.- .,--,•................- - :-- .- - - -, CONSTRUCTIONTF,s'nNG &LNCi... Ile ESCOD)1)O • CORONA • MODESTO • OXNARI) NC1NI?ERNG, 1N(: I NSPECTION REPORT (• 013 11 RNI>0 RI WJ9Y . -. ((. I RACi01: -. 84... - ARRIVED: i)IH'ARIJI): NSPECILON; MATERJAL IDENTIFICATION ( ) CONCRE1'E . coxg' ( )MASONRY .,RO \fl\4'1 St ( ) F.T. co'c I0?"\t 'YU/ISI ) f'II t) WELD k E B A R IRA ._ -- r' ( ) SHOP VILDINO STR si ''. PU P DRfVINO 14 S BOLT —1 7 PLAtN,.1' .:- PIA\itlI _.._ Is DC Fi1l1 S• ( )r'XP ANCHOR Frt('flkOD - - &TONCJETJi ( ) M01 TAR ( ) (i OtiT fl FIREPROOHNG () MASONRY BLOCK ( ) REBAR.. STRUCI'URAL s'rEEf. ( ) I3()LFS INSP. PERFORMED, JOB PROBLEM, MATERIAL icsENTiFlCATtON, PROGRESS, WORK REJECTED, REMARKS .. I 31q114&,65P CPS Nor, Owl -270 mA Certification of Compilailce: All workuñlesS ótherW.r1Otsd, complies with the approved plans and specificatlofla and tbe: uniform building code; .•• .' : : ... ________________________________________________ NAME: (PRINT) _U . SIGNATURE: CERTIFICATION NO. ---------_. - d#Sfl W t.,,WIWI'.1 't1 G TESTING & INSPECTION (619) 746 4955 VAX (619)746-9806 P.O. Box 26500-224 San Diego, California 92196 Phone (619) 536 1000 Fax (619) 536-8311 •••• I FIELD MEMO •:... IDATE 2. ,$9(. IDAY 27VtVYS I I PAGE / OF ( I engineering the white copy Job supenntendent yellow copy fieId fl.W. pink copy -, CONSTRUCTKN TESTING &'ENGINEERING,INL ESCONDIDO. CORONA. MODESTO • 0, 4'''' ENGINEERB'JG INC INSPECTION REPORT i - PAGE OF . CTEJOB# REPORT 4 PROJECT NAME:' 5C' . .. . "M ADDRESS / ?7? /Lwg,z MN /Ps ARCHITECT: .• . Tir'tjrj '44t SMflRTAP >-' '' ENGINEER ME — - CONTRACTOR:TAWAE111 WV ) SHOPWELDING INSPECTION DATE_ ?.1W1 WIN — WN mg __________ WN ARRIVED /2,V __DEPARTED 2 RON- PLAN k QC BLDG MIT_________________ 4 Matenal__Sampling I ( ) CONCRETE ( ) MORTAR ( ) GROUT ( ) FIREPROOFING () MASONRY BLOCK ( ) REBAR ( ),STRUCTURAL STEEL ( )BOLTS 1 t -,. I .. . .. ... .. . .. . . 7,-'p, c) z- .- 'S'5 7 e,c' ' C . •-.- ., ,. ,.- - -. ,., .,. Certificationof.Compljance:.All work, unless-otherwise noted, complies, with the approved plans and specifications and the C uniform building code . NAME (PRINT) SEGNATURE 2_,_I CERTIFICATION N -;2' - .. .. . .. -. ,' e.• GEOTECHNICAL & CONSTRUC1ION__ENGIrEERUG TESTING &INSPECTION 2414 VINEYARD AVENUES 1. E 0 ESCO'JDIDO CA 92H2) (61Q)746 " - 1 I I I CONSTRUC ESCOO MODEST CORONA.' O)ARD 'RENO • SEA E-e ASGAS ENGINEER]NG,'INC. INSPECTIONREPORT '. PAGE OF TE JOB I REPORT # PROJECTNAME: INS SCum4C,11E,Q. 0 1 ' jDbRESS:/97? /1' .11T10N, MATE 0€r4 t.EONCRETE CONC :: ( )MASONRY ARCHITE ( ) P.T.CONC MORTAR 1YPE11SI ENGINEER SSE I' CONTRA )FILLD WELD REBAR(,RADE CTOR SHOP WELDING INSPECTION DATE: '717( - • ) PILE DRIVING H S BOLT— PLAN FILE I BATCH PLANT MAS BLOCK BLDG,PERMIT )EXP.ANCHOR ELECTRODEi'--2i'"' LL0± OTHER 1 . . - I ()OTHER 1 0 A 4 .00 'I,! . •: .,'. •••• C - Matenal Samplmg r (CONCRETE (- )MORTAR'. (GROUT.( )FIREPROOFING'. )MASONRYBLOCK ..(1)REBARk ( ) STRUCTURAL STEEL (')BOLTS 1 L r I '• . . WFk VE 700 PR c !W7,*t2 7,432/ a ) ccic lyOr cF 7P , 7- /O C472C)'7f 2k2 7'6?SK,4 Di) li ENI''o,7 7'V6 /, ZuiP j - /I337J/ /(3 7. Ay Do 9 /fl, I/C,c' * 71e abk;t M,0,cc7aD /5 //J g e i7Z/2 :'419 ,ôVb /4iL#V - •. 0 KIZI4vx t8 ef - • - •, 0 ft •.': 0 • 0 . .: :- 0 0 • I • 4 44 it 7•1e •r'1 : 4 1 I Spec I NAME /Y7Ts o.f - CERTIFICATION NO •C 5(92 0 •.• • GEOTECHN1CAL & CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING TESTING & INSPECTION 0 - - •. -• 0 • • - 2414 VINEYARD AVENUE SUITE G ESCONDEDO CA 92029 (619) 746 495 FA'( (619) 746 9806 4;' I. - - - - 4 .t.ONSTRUCTON:TESNG, &. NMI z k. . ESCONDIDO CORONA. MODESTO • O)ARD GR4G INC.INSPECTION REPORT PAGE - OF CTEJOB# '2. REPORT PROJEQT NAME: ADDRESS ni c INSPEiMT .542 ~M -ITERJ WEIT1E1CTIONml CAQ'L ~6''9b o9'mlmv Z10 - - (MASONRY igki RouTfDf$4 ARCHITECT:_"/ - — ( T €ONC ENGINEER 0. ASS CONTRACTOR: A'oL -. HOP EL RX L4 S& INSPECTION DATE All "f v" 0 ' kei In - PLAN FILE p 77r. Rg- BLDG PERMIT:, 7 Am Material Sampling ( ) CONCRETE () MORTAR- ( ).QROUT'. ( ) FIREPROOFING (_ ) MASONRY.BLOCK ( )REBAR- ( .)STRUCTURAL STEEL () BOLTS -. * --• ,---•-- . -.•-,• - .- •- r INSP PERFORMED-JOB PROBtEM-MATERlALlDENTlFlCATlON PROGRESS V5c1AZ Y ,c7 77e F,167 Di4cc o Ei C6i 7B PA7a> '?4/2 P,q7E 7; z?57a F6qioc sqsi ,JD 7 7~ v, 4 AJO c77 eQ -- - •-- -- - .-• •.•• ,• - - d72D LDes t4E ccVgD fl?cV' Pôc&Ai,r, -. c21e?z i'zs /A's°c7Owe ,.c, 677 4cA77- co,,q7? -. 7 75 4'j7 ,C ni/ /1l6 ,4-, ,c'a Ole V2S/&.E D6C? ,4D 1>1_I ,cceb,Wc ',-7' -c : idS 277 / 72?6 /6Z) ,i) 4• 4- - -- - - - - - -- *• - _•4 4 4 - - -- - - - - .-••--•.• --• Certification Of Compliance: All work; uhlesè Otherwise noted,-cornpiies "with the approved plans aihd, 6pecificatfons andthe: - - -. `uniform.buildirgcode 4 7- : - -•- -. - -- - • - 0 - ;oI WAim NAME (PRINT) SIGNATURE ____________________ CERTIFICATION NO / GEOTECHICAL & CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING TESTING & INSPECTION 44 VINEYARD AVENUE SLITE G ESCONDIDO C \ 92029'( 746 49 FAX (61) 6 9806 0 - - - - - - - - • : - 0 • oeA ENGINEERING, INC. CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. ESCONDIDO • CORONA • MODESTO • OXNARD INSPECTION REPORT PAGE OF CTE JOB # REPORT# PROJECT NAME: 5C C'(6 ADDRESS: /'7? e4Kf &.A4 '4. ARCHITECT: M ~;?1'ai jtJ ENGINEER: Dise CONTRACTOR: KO( INSPECTION DATE: 16 ARRIVED: DEPARTED: " PLAN FILE: BLDG PERMIT: OTHER: Material Sampling ( ) CONCRETE ( ) MORTAR ( ) GROUT ( ) FIREPROOFING ( ) MASONRY BLOCK ( ) REBAR ( ) STRUCTURAL STEEL ( ) BOLTS V,st y o 2s, emec 72 i06 7 ,q.v,j) 72) &77ami i'Zvvce ,4AO m 77s,cj,j ,-: ,iEç 7'V 7?;q,Lc 3,7, Vi' V /A/cPEC7Z) 7?'E /TFc7 t2),-'/ e&iT 0.47 73 7P 4s/r,,z: OI4M : 2ioc Ffo"i Dd 710,r,_6 lc€ 27 - 9/ç (.1 A/i.'6 j / V1,50Aay,41.c/'gc7_,L 7-11E L/ F bECI 72) 72)e /2' c'iléç b. (i ' 8e7céA/ JJ• / /7 M p lec,,~- 'x', .z ' ,Vs' 7 72 ,',v7 -7 74 PãE >4 7 7 1%;TT,n ,47. E'ocr #"i z) 2- ,' , Cb?z 71',c1_Z-D 4ui)5 4)c477c C4if ,q77 ,w) ,E enf 4.i ,.v ,4cZ6Z'WC tiJ7l' Certification of of Compliance: All work, unless otherwise noted, complies with the approved plans and specifications and the uniform building code. NAME: (PRINT) D*rë 1'4AXO4I' SIGNATURE: CERTIFICATION NO.:'C - " 7 GEOTECHNICAL & CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING TESTING & INSPECTION 2414 VINEYARD AVENUE SUITE G ESCONDII 0. CA 92029 (619) 746-4955 FAX (619) 746-9806 jrQ , c Ar!'p - '4 • (\ .1•- .'.I • c..rm1at10nof QompUan unifom, building code NAME:(PRiNT)TC cERTJFIcAfloNNo.: 9ôiTi' -•' - -- Ot- GEOTECHNICAL & CONSTRUcTiON ENGINEERING TESTING & INSPEc'TION 4- ) 2414 VINEYARD AVENUE SUITE G ESCONDIDO CA 92029 (619) 746 495 FAX (619\ 76 9S06j 4 4- * jr •: tESCOND1DO' MODESTO • CORONA O)ARD.RENO • SEATTLE AS VEGAS' ENGINEERING INC - INSPECTION REPORT PAGE OF j' Ji CTEJOB)t -1 PORT # PROJECT NAME 'C((O ADDRESS /1T T10N )CONCRETE, (ONe ( } MASONR\ GROlfr M[X/PSI ARCHITECT PM-f)'qjMJ PT CONC.MORTAR TYPE/PSI ENGINEER h<FIELD WELD R[BARUPJ.DE CONTRACTOR:Vi-t- cO rRu4b,v '( ) SHOP WELDING STR STEEL INSPECTION DATE )PILEDRWING HS.BOLT'1 ' PLAN FILE BATCH PLANT MAS BLOCK BLDG PERMIT t' ) EXP ANCHOR ELECFRODE OTIIER:? • '( )3ÔTFTER £ 4 - - tt -. • • •. • F - L . , 'Matenal Sampling - ()CONCRETE- '( R ( ) GROUP-:"('-) FIREPROOFING (• )MASONRY BLOCK 4 ( )REBAR ( ) STRUCTURAL STEEL ( ) BOLTS r ffl AN m MAAL $&NTIFICATON WORK REJt5 REMARK f'OVID Vffr/141 F'5u' wz-D/,v,', /W', Y7OIV. -wp WEL177 PCK 'E11-R 6TV12 - /fIRit'z 'figg7 /i7L, , V1 c77 J?f/ Pri - 1 -ro s.t'è vT f#7 1.: - • • - •, • •- - - -: - - - •- -3 •. --i " - cñi pie7i Lt/-P,5 4 w t p --4--j2 i- - Al A-iJP PtP g c,th tet' py/c_ -, - -. y•'- -F •t - • • • - -Z3 r-'--- • •' -- • 0 • -- 3 4 - • - -4 i - NAME (PRINT) 4t '-k-/ SIGNATURE &- Z -2- CERTIFICATION No.: GEOTECHNICAL &CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING TESTING & INSPECTION - -• ,; -• - • -- •FF • • •-- - • - •-- • FF t --3 •- 4 • • -• - • • •- - - 2414 VINEYARD AVENUE SUITE GESCONDIDO, CA 92029 (619) 746-4955 FAX (19) 746-980;. i_:; - -- - _--;• •- - j-:-- I jII1IIIIIIL v (II) ki a; a; I ti ___ I' I 1Ill!iJlluu)lliUbJ!I /illI4luif//IlluU! ____ ti) tIll1llU;Ih11h,JhI ?Ah/i,i?i - /fli//g/lltill IIIillhIhIiiII!II - II1LJ . I t [fit ill f J ç/I! JIIIIIIIJ liik lI( &'ii'M/ ! t)I& /11:fs4hiiiiiiiii lilt II fill ifillllii m '' Iliillt_- 'a:sis fi/iv O f'E2- 7?2P •uJ WL.J7 7, PEEK FfAf t/iX2i V:F(),/1 in - -, L t,i/rI•i. A-a7 iP' A'1-t I..-P tVP WE, i am NAME: (PRINT) Ai SIGNATURE CERTIFICATION NO.:) :- - GEOTECHMCAL & CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING .TESTING & INSPECTION -. - 2414 VINEYARD AVENUE SUITE GESCONDIDO, CA 92029 (619) 746-4955 FAX (619) 746-9806 - - • -• •. CONSTRUCTIONTESTING & ENGINEERING,:INC. ESCONDIDO • CORONA • MODESTO • OXNARD ENGINEERING, INC. INSPECTION REPORT PAGE OF CTE JOB # /4?7 REPORT # PROJECT NAME: 5Cffiji/A //< ADDRESS: /79 %'V/?' AS 6U'9Y ARCHITECT: IflC 6a) OiiN ENGINEER: J),4$'E .L7L1 $76/Y CONTRACTOR: __6111 6 ______________________ INSPECTION DATE: ARRIVED:óA.M. DEPARTED: PLAN FILE: BLDG PERMIT: OTHER: MaterialSampling ( ) CONCRETE ( ) MORTAR ( ) GROUT ( ) FIREPROOFING ( ) MASONRY BLOCK ( ) REBAR ( ) STRUCTURAL STEEL ( ) BOLTS V/5J/L Y 1' 74cTEZ .%g E7 A'>v6 c-F s 53eect 7,-,- ,T 'v..) /2',72_7 3oZ7,k1 A4,VE OF 4,tJZ)Th 7.9.7O-j4/,r _Si4c /-nEc 0/V Li'vCs _6 1,2. Yf 4', ..'1)q, tc - _____1 / _'v:5_:?;I To(-2 QWWCE OF 1367A44 Fo . / ° ?c a- /1/) V/co4zy/,cnD T//6__JZ)Z26___L/4/6_() LjC/7 7P LGEF e?6A'97: /7f//274,-"'V,Z V/'tY_Z7 _000'6 __Z' A7 7 Zm(l--.rDil ½_ /C4 ov_C_Za#v, ,A/)46O __Cf 44) ,jr D4 7 ,4 41AC's) NAME: (PRINT) .f)ii-L_ SIGNATURE:____________________ CERTIFICATION NO.: j/ _7 7 GEOTECHNICAL & CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING TESTING & INSPECTION 2414 VINEYARD AVENUE SUITE G ESCONDIDO, CA 92029 (69) 746-4955 FAX (619) 746-9806 - L ¼ ' : - --- -. •. ; ' -. c TING VlUdNGINE RING . % I . -1_ - •.- .-F:; ESCONDIDO • MODESTO • CORONA • OXNARD • RENO • SEATFLE • LAS VEGAS ENGNEERINO INC.INSPECTION REPORT PAGE OF CTEJOB# /O-/6iL i• REPORT# PROJECT NAME •• •.- -• r •• ••• ADDRESS /'f 79'. 4g 74 INSPECTION MIR1ALIDENI1PICA J ( ) CONCRETE CONC MIXIFM_ ft ) MASONRY GROUT MIXP[PSI - 'ARCHITECT.MIP Li// P.T.CONC.MORTAR TYPEIPSI 'ENGINEER-.-D/frE O,,uA/A "( FIELD WELD REBARORADE________ CONTRACTOR KOLt /95r SHOP WI- LDING STR STEEL INSPECTION DATE - ~ ( ) PILE DRIVING H S BOLT PLAN FILE BA1 CH PLANT MAS BLO( K BLDG PERMIT 77 X - -, -•..-'- '-. )EP ANCHOR- 'TROD --'-- OTHER bTHER r Matena1 SampIin ( ) CONCRETE ( ),MORTAR ( ) GROUT ( ) FIREPROOFING ) MASONRY BLOCK ( ) REBAR (,)STRUCTURAL STEEL': ()BOLTS 4• -' 4 ' PROGRESS WOAfrREJCTED EMARX ES PIOVIDLp A/L Lii & ) 1'dp RoP Ji ml /rJrt-ii7 ,-? C41mA/ FO&r7A)c &rED t-/iVE' 4 //7, HI,RAtIL,c____Am will-f' Au(. j iop' It'6 w AEmE,vT , j, •-• •• -&:- - - - ; OØRVE, P9' W'T,LUfrrfc)i f () i ?i'er /'a ft70r! ,V& Ipc.-,4-rC, f iVT A 4 /IV74zt14i7t4/ c.b,rfo,flf 77 4 7AIL 7s 2_ I I - • - • '--':' - • - - •f•• - - -• - • •:. • . :.'- - , ' j t A .- • j - -• -'' - -'- • -. -•• -• --- • :.- ------ '- •--, - •--- - '• -. .•• --, •c .4-, A 4. 4q12- ,• I cornpes wththe aod anand specffItidñs dffi?1 — - - -•• - •-- - - -,- , - ,- , - - • - -•I- .- - • *•'-, - --- -.-• - L121 j- - -• - NAME (PRINT) i4-- C-4-A' SLGNAUIE '& CERTIFICATION NO - 1' III •' '% I ' - - - - GEOTECHNICAL'& CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING TESTING & INSPECTION A 2414 VINEYARD AVENUE SUITE G ESCONDIDO CA 92029 (619) 746 495 FAX (619) 7469806 ,.- -' •' -. 1 • l -' - - - - - • • --' - - - CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENLNEERING, IN, ESCONDIDO • CORONA • MODESTO • OXNARD ENGINEERING: INC. INSPECTION REPORT PAGE / OFL - cTEJOB# REPORT - * PROJECT NAME: - ADDRESS: 9,7. PAi p y EN CAA$34t7 2 (RZ r 1 MASONRYGaoLrM1x#,psI ARCHITECT )AV. co 3 -MOR1AiTYPE/PSI ENGINEER ( )F1ELDWELIY.REBAR GRADE - CONTRACTOR P_ L .-'- () SHOPWELDIIGFL STEEL INSPECTION DATE._______ oil ARRIVED:DEPARTED:_______ - wk PLAN FILE: TROD ~01 OR BLDG PERMIT (5 - / _' all MMC rw OTHER______________ - Material_Sampling •: : ( ) CONCRETE ( ) MORTAR (,)GROUT ()FIREPROOFING ( ) MASONRY BLOCK ( ) REBAR ()STRUCTURAL STEEL '( ) BOLTS • .AS6AL,/AD '4_ ocI 77ew. I , /)tO,y4 A/i7 13' T 'U,V '/,? P6,4 17 Z/ 5 / /7 'N 5 3o 3 2, 4 4o,'4 A i/7 4 4 / 7 PtA 05 Wz 5 r141 ,-5 3, 3 3_ l-OA//'A,i5' 7_13 TW,y _C)4o_P4'3_D74/ __ I5 _Jh_- NOT' i _oA_/ 4 - '-oi _A/o_/_B,( _DP'-- __- T#.E 5tZE ,a,/c &P7 P P4ivf /2 TO - - - - - - - - — NAME (PRINT) fkt"(W__kJ%2L7/? SIGNATIJRE 1t_7L2- CERTIFICATION NO . GEOTECHNICAL & CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING TESTING & INSPECTION - -. 2414 VINEYARD AVENUE SUITE G ESCONDIDO CA 92029 (619) 746 4955 FAX (619) 746-9806 - ........... - - ................. .,-. * : :- - '4'.2 . ••'', '_ -•"V :. •-. i- , _•; ,••, 4. Et -, I 44 SPECTION , : I 7.0 U i• : - -ON STRUCTION IESTING & 1JNGINEERING, INC. i ESCONDIDO • MODESTO. CORONA• OXNARD •RENQ • SEATFLE ,LAS VEGAS ENGINEERING INC INSPECTION REPORT 34 - LAGEOFL_ CTEJOB#2 —/h2.- REPORT# / PROJECTNAME /1,-f-IR tk - ADDRESS ['775K MER11DiThN ) ()CONCRETE., Co C NJ] X1PSI ( ) MASONRY GROUT MIX'PSI i ARCHITECT /'7rk/ A1Wifl/ ( ) P.T.CONC.MORTAR I 't PEPSI ENGINEER Pt Pffii.J )IIELD WELD -CONTRACTOR:OL..L- COA/T 2 ' ( )SI-IOPWELDING SIR STEEL INSPECTION DATE 7--I -)PILE DRIVING H S BOLT PLAN FILE - '.- ' ) BTCIJ PLAN NIAS BLUE is. liv .- 4, ,, , ., , •, EXP AN(FIOR ELECTRODE OTHER .4 .. . Matenal SampJing ( ),CON ( ) MORTAR ( ) 1 ( ) FIREPROOFING j ) MASONRY BLOCK ( ) REBAR ( ) STRUCTURAL STEEL ( ) BOLTS .. ..., •: ,.. -' •••; • , • - •. EWE"!,; FICA' i5llsl~t&40(jk TrEQi,REM#.RKS - -r J ,'VnJ,rORt' rOgY iW 7V 5)(f9Y/#Vo ''L-4 ,4r 1Jk/ rOor/,t/' k's, d A 'VP i—i / 34 ,A/'r-t rIO iJ 14 /Wi) J&.JIZ1R 2F /5 . A . •,,, : . f,,, ., -.. .4. -•- MOM 66mpl*s In m—mi m A "m '.4 NAME (PRINT) AL SIGNATURE CERTIFICATION NO 5 't 74LO --GEOCHCAL&-CONSTRU-ON ENGEERG TEST .4' ' -. - .___••_4_4__••_•• Cmmeni: ..k4. 2,I4dlCLJ r. 714500448 DASSE DESIGN 372 PGI FEB 12 '96 09:49 DESIGN OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC. STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS 8001 IrvIne Center Drive, Suite 825• Irvine, CA 92718 •714I4500444 • Fx 714/4500448 FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL To - 1'Je,rii' Data z/i Time: I Firm No. of Pages (Including covet): FAX No.: 4 '1 ') (ao3 - " Original to Follow: 0 Yes )q No From; -kA 0 As requested Project: Fo your infosvnarion Re; p-f - 1 f' 13 0 For review & comment DASSE Proj. # 1ST510 ts 0 For approval cc: i L. j?& r 0 Please call upon receipt smittinQ the FoItcyvig If you do nor receive all the pages indicated, please Cell US 0S soon as possible at (714) 450.0444. ' 7144500448 DASSE DESIGN ' I • ' 412 P01 FEB 23 '96 1029 DESIGN OF SOUTHERN I CALIFORNIA INC. STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS 8001 Irvine Center DrIve, Suite 825 • Irvine, CA 92718 .71414500444 Fax 71414504)448 FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL To: -_' Date: 2/23/9 ( Time.: 03 Firm: g-c L1. -' No. of Pages (Including cover): 2 FAX No.: ' (Jot ) ( 03 4-2- Original to Follow: 0 Yes . No From: . o ,' As requested Project: ''$— L?AC-41.-__ j 1' 0 For your information ' Re: For review & comment DASSE Proj. '# 13'h I o 1 3 ' , D For approval ' cc: 0 Please call upon receipt ' If you do not receive all the pagesindicareil,please call us as soon as possible at (714).450-0444 I, COLUMN 5 BASE PLATE AND ANCHUPIAct 2. SOEDUL (i F001, S IS COLUMN .OFCOS L TO INTERFACE WITH - :_GUSSET (E) SLAG SEE DETAIL I.C.C. SLAB I T.O.C. SLAB WELD •- ,. t - - - - A S L l - SLAB-ON-Cg "\" I I PER DETAlIm - Lo :! tv —11/2"NON -SHRINI GROUT - LA S 114- NON-SHRINK GROUT I L La 7 •/ 1 :1 •••••• . ___ __ _ .•. ( .5_ : - i----\. - .- J• - -S 0 •.•.J&,• 4 TIES 0 3c : - a ••- - . - ' - _______ 5• ••.- .:..:.t4u1 :i$0; _ -:. A.83 w,V31 /e1sQ , ru DSL. NUT AT- BASE FOR BRACE, GUSSET FOR BASE PLATE AND . FOR BRACE, GUS PLATE. 'AND WELD- ANCHOR BOLTS INFO.. PLATE; AND WELD NQ INFO. SEE DETAIL _12 1 : SEE DETAIL INFO. SEE DETAIL _12 PRC BM S3.1 • • $2.2 • S3.I -q - • • m LCOLUMN S ••• _ 6 TS BRACE ANCHORAGE AT TS COLUMN 2 CC - 2 2 LD CD V V V _Geotenics. C P.O. Box 26500-224 Sun Diego, California 92196 Phone (619) 536-1000 Fax (619) 536-8311 40 DAILY REPORT OF G0413ING OBSERVATION IoATEz-,cI( I IDAY1iP~A4'/ I I PAGE _.Z PROJECT k/M4c/h9 ,C/t /77(1 /1Oi tM CUENT PROJECTNO. c272' O /O / IGRADING I''A?C iAj) GENERAL CONTRACTOR LOCATION CONTRACTOR C 427 TECHNICIAN .. . WEATHER c 1T PROJECT ENGINEER ,4Z/2, .. - - SITE CONDITIONS 1_71e167 VISITORS . IDAV'SAPPROX. YARDAGE. SOURCE AND CLASSIFICATION OF FILL MATERIAL /44ç $c 7h.thr c41AzZ EQUIPMENT USED IN OPERATION . -c Zj'ij p. TECHNICIAN TIME AT JOB ON OFF - HOURS CHARGED NUMBER OF TEST PASSING FAILING - APPROVED BY SPECIFIC LOCATION OF WORK PERFORMED /979 /14'? /,,4/ . V. &5 -V(AJ, 74I G a7c /)I7icJCT1J 11&ø497'cz SUMMARY OF OBSERVATIONS S S S 7;w$ 2n'/ Pt771) JI~,,-./ 74 c.- rc:- O,4j f 1/J7) 71 à41 $c/,J&f - 7ñS Mö7 . o; e) /) /L4it41)A7 m. dgøx/c)) ,I-tJ / ( $ pM) • - 2c\-r :. .5 5 '-t- tLi AREA$ NEEDING RETESTING/REWORKING • S • engineering tile: white copy • Job superintendent: yellow, copy - • field tile: pink copy I G eotczhnics P.O. Box 26500-224 I .. . . San Diego, California .92196 n C 0 'r p or a t .e . - Phone (619) 536-1000 Fax FIELD MEMO (DATE Z. 59 (e, I (DAY I I PAGE 1 OF / I PROJECt~/4 UMAC4ñ? £4*'L 1?AKS CLIENT. PROJECT NO.: d7Z. 0 4/O ( MEMO BY: SUBJECT: Jfrc76¼ç 1AJbt 7p-\J u je1C ftj 2'wAc /26d&ef 17/é id'"-' i&I ~&PUø) ?.jogq 77 /6 rn 97 PJko4m7O,1,'s ZdAZ 7/' 72d4 PsL /'i? C/q 447?(M. 7 'e frJ,317) AL c ,4P.PA'O .%' &2O1J -f7 '72' fIT P4) 4c& 1ái io /ft19O-.if i? r'(e*$d72tJ7 A,1 I th/Z(7L 4JSC,?123oJ)) 1'AJ 7/* O 7?C,L1 /& Uh5/ - /9Z4 7 çi ,'9a 7c/4q4u 5' A?& PU7/1 /1J(JK,/ 4i)i TTh'-J 7b ,(id4')Ae id& jC1 /7/-S , /?fr' 47//J/ç)/Q /1?) V. rA I.., engineering file: whlte'copy . . job superintendent: yellow copy field file: pink copy o/ ENGINEERING. INC. CONSTRUCTIoNTEsTiNG & NGINEERING, INC. ESCONDIDO • MODESTO • CORONA • OXNARD • RENO • SEATTLE • LAS VEGAS INSPEHON REPORT PAGE OF CITE JOB # a REPORT# / PROJECT NAME: 'f)i4'i cF/ER. ADDRESS: f7q 17A L Oi?i,4 , Inn ilin 1flJ U 811I1111J1IiIIU IUB .1111 1 IUBU I JdJ1II[JII jllJjjj PER 111011111110,111111 te pill 01111111111111 1 111 'JJJ1LI' I. 'J1 M IiIIIIluE fftft i' ARCHITECT: k A1'V fLrThY//1/ ENGINEER: P/ P CONTRACTOR: INSPECTION DATE: _ 72 PLAN FILE: BLDG PERMIT: OTHER: MaterialSampling ( ) CONCRETE ( ) MORTAR ( ) GROUT ( ) FIREPROOFING ( ) MASONRY BLOCK ( ) REBAR ( ) STRUCTURAL STEEL ( ) BOLTS rnov,i-7 f72X( Alf , r If tifA/& St-A r ,r /J(/ 2r7V ' / L-(,le 6, r.d i, A j/7 /_/ttJe / :rc) 3A riO,t/ TA '2 ,2_ f/(7/,i7 /t"7 ,2 Fr2/ //f(.//L'c7 CL.4/tI)g jrgp 0p(4(4 t/& 7t•L 47'77-'ET /A/r7 4—ff-1&I_T27 3; gAr AT_foiorn O07-C9 // _2,2 /tIpFfP,47-/g/V i NAME: (PRINT) SIGNATURE: / CERTIFICATION NO.: GEOTECHNICAL & CONSTRUCTION ENGINER1NG TESTING & INSPECTION 2414 VINEYARD AVENUE SUITE G ESCONDIDO, CA 92029 (619) 746-4955 FAX (619) 746-9806 P.O. Box 26500-224 San Diego, California 92196 Phone (619) 536-1000 Fax (619) 536-8311 IDA? j7i?S : I PAGE OF I PROJECLcc/kJ44,,,fr,t/2fz /at //?5 CLIENT SCQV1;14C 6?117? PROJECT NO.117 rdO7O/ MEMO BY: GAY ,9.MW?t c SUBJECT: fOc,t'L)nyM?u Y(mJA-iifkJS &1?i 7L'g2 ,c(Ix mr,wi,ci1? 7W if )22 P/1 f429AJ$ R'v) 4LOcA?) ,r 5? PI9 7 4/<J iw cfAl2d2i~ '~- /iA?,41 fL it- 44412?/kS1 hirrJA, f-/) j2)(l.\(3 CT & 7<3fq$Th $'~ P3 rm e Coiyoi'ç ,42rb Mf 7Z4-P(& c 9XP5) /c 77f aai c/iw?c 5',/M3(4 i? fljWf17 72 7zO J72o P7fo'? 7Z 7?f 4i'/7d7• (7&/t C / dk44,l 7i17 5 2ZII<J ( frJ 1. /1 - GEOTECHNICS INCORPORATED, BY: -y (SIGNATURE) engineering fiIe white copy job superintendent: yellow copy field file: pink copy CONSTRUCTIONTkSTING & ENGINEERING, INC. ESCONDIDO. MODESTO • CORONA • OXNARD • RENO • SEATTLE • LAS VEGAS. ENGINEERING, INC. INSPECTION REPORT PAGE /OF / - . '.,.. . CTE JOB # - REPORT# PROJECT NAME: 34 - ADDRESS: / 79 ARCHITECT: 4'/ ENGINEER: . CONTRACTOR: INSPECTION DATE:, '- PLAN FILE: BLDG PERMIT: OTHER:. Material Sampling (<) CONCRETE ( ) MORTAR ( ) GROUT ( ) FIREPROOFING ( ) MASONRY BLOCK ( ) REBAR ()STRUCTURAL STEEL ( ) BOLTS . . - / - — I 4. '!1.4,ci'-)_O• _Cc.J-:- _\____cI:Y_•...l,'.I/,,"-''' . . . --E ( CERTIFICATION NO.: GEOTECHNICAL & CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING TESTING & INSPECTION 2414 VINEYARD AVENUE SUITE G ESCONDIDO, CA 92029 (619) 746-4955 FAX (619) 74-9806 T. rrR j,y,q H l-k;-1- N1) 11:1 •-F I-i- EN 1Nfr1Nl INL 1ti - ft51-fl R2HEngzneenng, Inc. c JOB NO PROJECT /_____ DATE___ BY____________ - SU BJ ECf 6tr SHEET-.- OF____ - .• • '•• - - • - - • - - - - - -•- * * - - -.. • - - - -- - - - .• FEE-21-96 NELl 11:1r1 R2H ENGINEERING INC 1 r-41 R2H Engineering, Inc JOB NO 71jIJI PROJECT L7 L DATE BY~SUBJECT i-- SHEE1_______ OF - - - . 04/18,/1E96 9:19 6196738418 R2H ENGINEERING. . PAGE 02/03 R2FI Engineering, Inc JOB NO. PROJECT_- DATE__________ BYP( -: SUBJECT_ -- .. SHEET_J~~ _115 o 2 7 .--- .cL..42-l FC lie 41, T0 *:; r pov. ,-;;r— P.9gr Vo -. ------- (/) Et/. 41F ... - I JAflO tJ • . __ --- 'u7a) ,4 - - X . - -- 4. • -. . •, - -. '-4-. -. . •. -- - • .• - - - •.,. iri'-'-- T/'O /, x 4X) - .940 'AT 17, grAJ- - -.--•-. ___ - - - - '- •. --- I l - -•• •- -i . T. - - -- - .E1 . ici ji: ii bii,j41b -1 t.I'L..r<.Lc r,-. ui..j R2H Engineering, Inc.JOB NO __QT5Iij PROJECT JOT DATE/'' BY_____________ SUBJECT /Z41L..i SHEET _124& OF 4VL .i24ey 11L4 4 / s/ OP MB-• 45 ST REPORT Westinghouse Electric Corporation INSULATED CASE BREAKER GROUND FAULT Los Angeles Enginethgn Office Customer: L/1C M'"C'. s1 (_JcCIiZ, Q 11205 Knott Ave., Suite A, Cypress, CA 90630 P.O. No. .X4 1.? klIq Cj1,.. b'Z. (714)372-5600 FAX(714)372-5671 wt job No. .J&-S BREAKER DESCRIPTION .. Designation: jt.iiJ - k)oo A . Voitaae: -ie 0 Manufacturer: (W) . Frame: (Oo Serial No.: p Rating: J ade) ,4 Type: C,'J Is C. 3 ia r 36 eAJ , Trio Unit: 2ij4. £Lik,"/c - SETTINGS 12T Long Delay . Short Delay Instantaneous Ground. RU (Ama) &,o Tl)Sec) OVERCURRENTTEST Curve Test Ground Pickuo (Amos) GroundTime(Sec) . l ELECTRICAL TESTS Insulation Integrity Level (Meoohms) @ VDC (Meçohms) @ 500 VDC Breaker Closed I Breaker Ooen A - G [_A - B I\ ,, I Phase A \/ , Neutral I o4 B-G /... A-C l'5 I Phase B VZ C -QJ $ B - CI / I Phase REMARKS Li_ EsGil corporation fProfessiona(!Pian Review Engineers DATE: 1/19/96 NT U, LClC JURIS FIRE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad 0 PLANREVIEWER U.FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 95-1636 •. SETS III PROJECT ADDRESS 1979 Palomar Oaks Way PROJECT NAME: Warehouse and Second Floor Additions, and Remodel U The plans transmitted herewith have"been corrected where necessary and substantially comply With the jurisdiction's building codes The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply, With the jurisdiction's codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed checklist and shouldbecorrected:and resubmitted for a complete rechck. El The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being heldàt Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. - The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to fc*ward to the applicant contact person. • The applicant's copy of the check list has been sentto: Philip Pape MäGraw/Baldwin Architects • -. 701 B Street, Suite 200, San Diego, CA 92101 • Esgil Corporationstaff did not advise the applicant that.theplancheck has beencompleted. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed: Person contacted: • I • •, Date contacted: (by: ) Telephone #: • REMARKS By: Pete Fischer - - Enclosures: - Esgil Corporation : • • GA CM n GP fl PC • 1/17/96 •. •trnsmtLdot ____________ .,_. S .' •;, , EsGil Corporation Trofesswiuz(TCan Qeview Engineers ' DATE 1/3/96 -APP11T JURIS. .0 FIRE • JURISDICTION Carlsbad 0 AN REVIEWER 0 FILE PLAN CHECK NO 95-1636 SET II PROJECT ADDRESS 1979 Palomar Oaks Way PROJECT NAME Warehouse and Second Floor Additions, and Remodel I . The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's *********** codes The plans transmittd herewith will sibstantiaIIy óornply with th"e 16risdictions*k********codes1 when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff The plans transmitted herewith 'have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed checklist and should be correctedandresubinitted for a complete recheck., - - -. . ., , ... ---•I. • The check list transmitted herewith is for your information The plans are being held at Esgil 'Cbrporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contabt peson. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to Philip Pape, McGraw/Baldwin Architects 4 701 B Street, Suite 200, San Diego, CA 92101 ¶ Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been comp)eted Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan chek has been completed Person contacted I Date contacted (by ') Teldphone # -REMARKS:,, By: Pete Fischer. Enclosures Esgil Corp'oration - • - S GA E CM fl GP PC 12/21/95 trnsmtl dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive Suite 208 • San Diego California 92123 • (619) 560-1468 • Fax (619) 560-1576 Carlsbad 95-1636 : 1/3/96 RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICT!ON: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 95-1636 PROJECT ADDRESS: 1979 Palomar Oaks Way, SET: H DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY . . DATE RECHECK COMPLETED: ESGIL CORPORATION:- 12/21/95 . 1/3/9 " REVIEWED BY: Pete. Fischer FOREWORD (PLEASE READ) This plan review is limiteU to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code,'. Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department.' You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments: . . The following items need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied -before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 303 (c), 1991 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. * . .. A. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new -.sets' of prints to Esgil Corporation or the jurisdiction's building department. 'B. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this'sheet has been made and return this sheet with the - revised plans. . • ' : The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews. The original correction number has been given for your reference. Please contact me if you have .any questions regarding these items. ' . ' • . " Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a. result of. corrections from this list. . If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and whre ' * they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? ' . * IYes.. :UNo . •' 4 • * Carlsbad 95-1636 1/3/96 Only resubmit the revised sheets for the following: Please sign the revised sheets per the original comment. Recheck the Building Code Data Legend on the Title Sheet. a. The allowable area increase for yards on all sides should be shown as a 70% increase. The allowable area should check the "one story" allowable. What is the "x2" factor in the increase(sprinklers?). b. With the proposed construction under the 1994 UBC as indicated: Identify the locations of the S2 storage, and provide a 1 hour occupancy separation from the group S2 use from all other uses. Provide smoke dampers at all walls and ceilings requiring protected openings. . .. - Indicate on the cover sheet which edition of-the UMC, UPC and NEC apply. If there will be group H occupancies, then the building must be made to comply with current Building Code requirements for the new H occupancies. Please provide complete details to show the building will comply. All H occupancy requirements will be reviewed if there will be group H occupancies. Section 502. Letters referring to the report from Mary Eriksefl-Raftan indicate there are group H3 occupancies. . See the original comment. Provide the report from Mary Eriksen-Rattan for review. Section 901(f). • •. . . 11. Per the calculations on sheet Ti .0, indicate on the site plan on sheet A1.0 that 34' yards are required on all sides for the allowable area increase. 19. Show the window opening adjacent to the door on sheet 08000-3 has a fire-protection rating of at least 3/4-hour. Show the revised window 8 is limited to 25% of the area of the corridor wall separating the room from the corridor. Section 1005.8.2. 22. Show safety glazing for all glazing in the window schedule on the plans per the original comment (within 24" of doors and within1 8" of the floor. 29. Provide note and details on the plans to show compliance with the enclosed Disabled Access Review. List. •.- S • Note on the plans that the spray booth is an approved booth constructed in accordance with the Fire Code per Section 302.1 Exception 1. The new top of roof sheathing heights on A2.4 are all the same. lndlcate the correct elevations for the minimum 1/4" per foot roof slope. S Carlsbad 95-1636 1/3/96 Verify the metal studs are adequate to span the required Wall heights at the 1 exterior walls with wind loads. Most 6" - 16 gage metal studs are not adequate for the wind loads on calculation sheet R8. Soil report review: Show the sand and visqueen below the slab per the soil report. Provide a letter from the owner acknowledging the risk of cracking and settlement for the new construction. it. Provide the mitigation for the liquefaction hazards. The new work should . . not be constructed unless it Will be stable during a seismic event. 37. Note on the foundation plan that "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building Department foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the building official in writing that: . '.a. The building pad was prepared in accordance with, the soils report, b. The utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and C.. The foundation excavations comply with, the intent of the soils report." 44; Note an A.I.T.C. Certificate of Compliance for glued laminated wood members shall be given to the building inspector prior to installation. Section 2505. A note was not found on sheet S1.0. 50. Per the calculations, indicate on the second floor framing plan on sheet S3.1 that a minimum 3" separation is required from the new second floor to the building walls and columns of the existing building. Also show the separation on the architectural sheets, such as in 8/A6.2, 15/A6.0, etc. 52. Note to provide fire blocks per Section 2516 (f). A note was not found. 55. Plan revisions: The areas of the different occupancy groups on sheet T1.0 do not match sheet A2.0. , • Provide sheet A3.0 (it is missing from the revised sets). If you have any questions regarding these items, please contact Pete Fischer of Esgil 'Corporation at (619) 560-1468. Thank you. ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW . PLAN REVIEWER: Chuck Mendenhall , 58. Show the size of the transformer secondary ground conductors and specify the nearest electrode" used for each transformer secondary ground system (i.e., building steel, cold water pipe). NEC 250-26(c). This applies to transformer TI on E-6.I . ' Carlsbad 95-1636 . . . 1/3/96 . 60. Identify all loads proposed for the new service equipment. I. could not find the load summary on sheet E-61 as indicated in the response. .. 65. Show on the plans the location of transformersT2 & T3. Show on the plans that these transformers have adequate ventilation. I could not locate these on sheet E4.1 as indicated in the response to this item. . . 67'. Provide GFP on the service per NEC Article 230-95. The symbol shown on the single line diagram is hot specified on the symbol legend. I presume this is a GFP device. Please clarify. . . . . Note: if you have any questions regarding this electrical plan review list please contact. Chuck Mendenhall at (619) 560-1468. Note on this list (or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans. . . . . . ., PLUMBING, MECHANICAL AND ENERGY CORRECTIONS PLAN REVIEWER: Glen Adamek . . . .. 75. The '1979 chemical inventory for building and occupancy permits' is incomplete for building code review. Letter dated October 10, 1994 to Pat Kelley states a report by Mary-Eriksen Rattan shows H-3 Occupancy in the building. Provide a copy of the report. The letter by Robert E. Kresky, of Schumacher states no H- Occupancies. Which is it? A complete review will be done when the report by Mary-Erikseh Rattan is provided.. .. . .. The maximum amounts, of each chemical in use are not shown in the list. Also the material categories, from UBC, Tables 9-A & 9-B, for each of the chemicals not shown in the list. Please provide. . Only..the locations of the storage of the chemicals are shown. Not the locations-of the of the use of the chemicals and type of use. (Open system, or closed system?) . . .• C) Containment is not required for non-H occupancies. . Spill control and drainage is not required for non-H occupancies. Manual shutoff control for ventilation equipment is not required for non-H occupancies. In all buildings or portions of B-occupancies buildings where Class I, II, or Ill-A liquids are used, exhaust ventilation, taken from near the floor, must be provided sufficient to produce six air changes per hour. UBC, Section 70(a). Please provide. Also is the spray booth apart of this permit? Tsuchiyama & Kaino statement: 'this system will be submitted separately by the spray booth manufacturer' Bleaker Bros. letter seems to show the spray booths are apart of this permit. Please clarify if booth is in or out. Car1sbad 95-1636 t S. 1/3/96 : S PLUMBING (UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE) 77. Provide special inspection for the welding of the lower water heater seismic clips to water heater pan and platform Sheet P5 0 detail I MECHANICAL (UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE) 80.- Fire rated corridors are not to be used to convey air to or from rooms. UMC Section 1002. Correct the make-up air to Toilet #3 [112] on sheet M2. 81 Provide smoke detectionin supply and.réturn air ducts for required automatic. shut-off controls as per UMC, Section 1009. . . . . . 82. Detail exhaust ventilation system compliance with UMC. See item # 75.0 above and provide complete plans details and calculations for the relocated dust collector system. • . a) Detail the exhaust outlet clearances? b) - Detail required exhaust ducting system support. . . C) Detail required exhaust ductind system fire protection. Detail required exhaust duct clearances from combustibles. Detail required exhaust duct minimum conveying velocities 0 Ducts conveying explosives or flammable vapors, fumes or dusts shall ' extend directly to the exterior of the building without entering other spaces. Please correct the spray booth extiaust - S S• ENERGY CONSERVATION S S . •* NOTE: Plans submitted after July 1, 1995 must comply, with the new energy standards. Provide plans, calculations and worksheets to show compliance with current ; energy standards. S • • . • , Provide 'complete energy designs for the proposed changes in envelope, and S mechanical systems.. Provide the completed ENV, and MECH- forms showing Energy compliance. The plans show changes in the envelopes (new skylights, new walls, and new or relocated doors' and S,indows. Provide the ENV- forms. The MECH-2 form for AC-5 shows the unit is oversized. Note AC.1 unit will comply with the calculations Please correct., . • • .•. Carlsbad 954636 . . 1/3/96. 85. On the plans clearly show the wall and roof insultion locations, thickness, and R-values, as per the energy design. 86. Show the daylit areas and required daylit area lightirigcontràls for lighting, in - daylit areas. Title 24, Part 6, Section 131(c). . 87. Complete.en&rgy plan check will be done when complete .corredtedenergy designs are provided. 88. The completed and sign'ed ENV-1, and MECH-1 forms .thustbè imprinted on the • .: plans. MECH-1 part 1 of 3on sheet Ml is not signed. The MECH-1 part 2 of .3 • MECH-1 part 3 of 3, ENV- I part 1 o 2, and ENV-1.párt 2 of 2 are not on the plans. Please correct. -- '•' S.. . Note: If you have any questions regarding this plan review list please contact Glen Adamek at (619) 560-1468. To speed the review process, note on this list (orr, a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed onthe plans. . • S - • . • - S . • S S S ,. S Carlsbad 95-1636 1/3/96 DISABLED ACCESS REQUIREMENTS FOR REMODELS' . . " (alterations structural repairs additions tenant improvements and occupancy changes) A. GENERAL Full access compliance is required for remodels, including: 4 Existing sanitary facilities serving the remodeled area '.WALKS, SIDEWALKS AND RAMPS . 9. ' If pedestrian ramps are required,. show all ramp slopes, landing dimensions, handrail locations, etc. per. 3307. Ramps are shown outside doors 133A and 133B on sheet C1.0 which do not comply with 3304 or 3307 STAIRWAYS AND HANDRAILS 12 Handrails are required on each side of stairs, per section 3306(i.1)1.' Provide sheet A3.0. The upper 'approach and the lower tread of each stair shall be marked by a strip of clearly contrasting color at least 2" wide and placed parallel to and not more than 1" from the nose of the step or landing. The strip shall be as slip resistant as the other treads of the stair: For exterior stairs, the 'upper approach and. all treads shall 'be marked. Provide sheet A3.0. *Tread surfaces shall be slip resistant and smooth, rounded or chamfered exposed edges and no abrupt edges at the nosing: Nosing shall nat project more than 11/21 past the 'face' of' the riser above; Risers, shall be solid (open risers arenot permitted). Provide sheet A3.0 , SANITARY FACILITIES 15 See 3105A(e)10 for additional signage on the wall adjacent to the restroom door 16. *As per section 3105A(b)3.B., there shall be a clear floor space at least 60" in diameter, or a T-shaped space as ,shown in Figure 31-12 (a) and (b). Doors are not permitted to encroach into this space.. Per the response, indicate on the plans that restrooms 106, 107 and 129 fully comply. Restroom 112 should comply as ',a restroom serving the remodeled area EsGil Corporation - Trofessiontz(T[an Review Engineers DATE 11 /29/95,UPPtCkNT JURI U FIRE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad N REVIEWER El 'FILE ' PLAN CHECK NO.: 95-1636 ' SET: I ., . PROJECT ADDRESS 1979 Palomar Oaks Way PROJECT NAME Warehouse and Second Floor Additions, and Remodel The'plans transmitted herewith have been correctedwheré necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's *********** codes - The plans transmitted herewith will substantially dornply with the jurisdiction's codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted hrewith hve significant deficiencies identified on'the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The pins are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans aresubmitted for'recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person The applicant's copy of the-check list hasbeen sent to: Philip Pape,. McGraw/Baldwin,Architécts 701 B Street, Suite 200, San Diego, CA 92101 , Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed J Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed Person contacted: Date contacted (by ) Telephone .#: REMARKS By: Pete Fischer. ' - • ' -. • ,, Encldsures: Esgil Corporation GA CM , GP • PC :11/14/95' ' "trnsmti.dot -- 9320 Chesapeake Drive Suite 208 • San Diego California 92123 • (619) 560-1468 • Fax (619) 560-1576 - ' -• 0 , , .* PLAN CHECK NO 954636 JURISDICTION Carlsbad OCCUPANCY B2,A3 USE OFF/MANUF/WARE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION VN SPR ACTUAL AREA ADD = 2760 EXIST = 17.350 ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA OK if B2/A3 STORIES :.2 . HEIGHT OK SPRINKLERS?: YES OCCUPANT LOAD 148 REMARKS DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY - JURISDICTION ESGIL CORPORATION 11/14/95 DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW - PLAN REVIEWER Pete Fischer COMPLETED 11/29/95 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ) This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit Code sections cited are based on the 1991 UBC The following items listed need clarification, modification or change All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations Per Sec 303 (c), 1991 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not .permit the violation of ay state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed i.e., plan sheet number, specification section etc - Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans LIST NO.'22 GENERAL COMMERCIAL WITHOUT ENERGY OR POLICY SUPPLEMENTS 6991 UBC) comforw dot '4 4 4 4 4 Carlsbad 954636 11/29/95 PLANS 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints, to: • Esgil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123, (619)560-1468. '• 1 , OR The jurisdiction's building, department. GENERAL All sheets of the plans and the first sheet of the calculations are required to be signed by the California licensed architect or engineer responsible for the plan preparation. Please include the California license number, seal, date of license .expiration and the date the plans are signed. Business and Professions Code." Provide a Building Code Data Legend on the Title Sheet. Include the following •',, code information for each building proposed: Occupancy Group '(based on the 1991 UBC) ' Justification to exceed allowable area in Table 5-C. The'areas,on sheet T-1.0 appear too high unless the area may be increased 100% for yards (the building ' does not appear to have yards for 100% increase, and the yard increase does .,not appear to be required). .• 0 , ' 0 0 4 Provide a note with the building data -legend stating that yards used for area increases shall be permanently' maintained.' 5 • Indicate on the Title Sheet whether or not a grading permit is required. 6. Provide a statement on the Title Sheet of the plans that this project shall comply • with Title 24 and 1991 UBC, UMC and UPC and. 1990 NEC., 7. The building has been reviewed assuming 'a group B2 occupancy. If there will be group H occupancies, then the building must be made to comply with current Building Code requirements for the new H occupancies. Please provide '• complete details to show the building will comply. All H occupancy requirements ,' will be reviewed if, there will be group H occupancies. ' Section 502. ' • 8. A complete description Of the activities and processes that will'occur in this tenant space should be provided. A listing of all hazardous materials should be included. The materials listing should be stated in a form that would make classification in Tables 9-A and 9-B possible. A technical report should be 0 ' provided to identify and develop methods of protection from hazardous materials. 0 'Section 901(f). 0 0 Carlsbad 95-1636 11/29/95 9. If control areas are used for exceeding the exempt amounts of hazardous materials from Tables 9-A and 9-13, they shall be constructed of not less that required for a one-hour occupancy separation. Section 404. a) Detail the wall construction, including a detail at the top to show the rating continues to the upper roof sheathing. b). The separation from control zone I to control zone 2 appears to be at the north end of room 116. Show fire dampers, 1 hour doors, no Windows, etc. from room 116 to corridor 114. • • SITE PLAN 10. : Provide a statement on the site plan stating: "AlIproperty lines, easements and buildings, both existing and proposed, are shown on this site plan". ii.; Clearly designate any side yards Used to justify increases in allowable area based on Section 506. : Clearly dimension building setbacks from property lines on the site plan. Show the location of any designated flood plains, open space easements, or other development restricted areas on the site plan. FIRE-RESISTIVE CONSTRUCTION 14. Detail how one-hour fire-:resistive wall construction is maintained at built-in wall fixtures and behind mailboxes, fire-extinguisher cabinets, electric panels exceeding 16 square inches in area, etc. Section 4304 (f). 15. New provisions inChapter43 of the 1991 UBC require special treatment of penetrations at fire-resistive assemblies. Provide typical details on the plans showing how the fire'-resistive integrity will be maintained at through penetrations and membrane penetrations (Include the manufacturers' names and ICBO numbers (or equal) for any sealant). • a) Indicate the approval number for 31E-8:1 or show the penetration in 3/E- 8.1 is less than or equal to 4" 0 and is sealed with a material complying with UBC Std 43-1. • • Detail all-plumbing penetrations at fire-resistive walls. Reference sheet A-2.0 onthe plumbing and electrical sheets for the locations of the fire-resistive walls. • EXITS 16. • Exit doors from Group A and within the exit path from Group A occupancies shall not be provided with a latch or lock unless it is panic hardware. Chapter. 33. Carlsbad 95-1636 11/29/95 17 Corridors serving 30 or more occupants shall have walls and ceilings of one-hour construction. Show the corridors outside rooms 115 and 128 are 1 hour since they are both required exits (for exit separation), and the occupant load served exceeds 30 18. One-hour.fire-rated corridors shall have interior door openings, protected by tight- fitting smoke and draft-controlassemblies rated 20 minutes. a) Doors shall be maintained self-closing or be automatic closing by action of = a smoke detector per Section 4306 (b) •• b) Doors shall be gasketed to provide a smoke and draft seal where the door meets the stop on sides and top. Section 3305 (h): c) See doors 106, 107, 112 and 113. Also see the doors serving the corridorsin comment 18. ••• 19. Window openings shall be protected by fixed glazing listed and labeled for a fire-protection rating of at least 314-hour at the 1 hour corridor. Section 3305 (h). 20. If a room with. an exhaust fan has ,a door opening into a rated corridor, show how makeup air will be provided to the room: The door cannot be undercut, nor can a louver in the door be provided. See doors 106, 1071 112 and 113. Section 3305(h) l. 21. Room 115 should have an exit sign directing the exit to door 101 B. The exit sign - should not be provided at door 120 if the maintenance area will have storage. Sections 3303(e), 3314(a). . GLASS AND GLAZING 22 Show, safety glazing in the following locations, per Section 5406(d) - • - a) • Where the nearest edge of glazing is within a 24-inch arc of either side of - - • • a door in a closed position (unless there is an intervening -wall between - -- - - - the door and the glazing or if the glazing is 6-0" or higher above the • -- - • walking surface). - • • - • - • - - b). • Glazing greater than •9 square feet with the bottom edge lessthan 18" - • - - - - - above the floor and the top edge greater thah 36" above the floor (unless - the glazing is more than 36" horizontally away from walking surfaces or if a-complying protective bar is installed). •. - • • - - •• - -- - • - •- - • • . ROOFS. - - -• -- 23. Provide skylight details to show compliance with Chapter 34• and Section 5207 or • provide ICBO or other recognized approval listing. - • • - : = - 24. Provide plastic roof panel details to show complianée with Section 5206 or - provide ICBO or other recognized approval listing Carlsbad 95-1636 0 11/29/95 0 .25..Specify ICBO, UL or other recognized listing approval number for roof materials . CITY OF CARLSBAD SUPPLEMENT Roof mounted equipment must be screened and roof penetrations should be minimized (City. Policy 80-6). Provide structural detailing for the screening.. No wiring is permitted on the roof of a building and wiring on the exterior of a build ing.réquires approval by the Building Official. (City Policy) f MISCELLANEOUS Note that suspended ceilings shall comply with UBC Tables 47-A and 23P. P29. Provide note and details on the plans to show compliance with the enclosed Disabled Access Review List. Disabled access requirements may be more restrictive than the UBC. 0 0. Include the door and window schedules as a part of the plans. 31. Will the spray boOth comply with 503(a) exception 1? Indicatethe new roof heights on the plans. 0 Provide a section viewof all new interior partitions. Show: a). Specify manufacturer and approval number or indicate "to be ICBO approved" for metal studs. . . . . 0 • b) Verify the metal studs are adequate to span the required wall heights, • especially at the exterior walls with wind loads. • • . • . FOUNDATION AND FRAMING 34. Provide a copy of the project soil report prepared by a California licensed architect or civil engineer. The report shall include foundation design recommendations based on the engineer's findings and shall comply with UBC Section 2905. .• . . 0 0 • . 0 • • 35. Specify on the foundation plan or structural specifications sheet the soil . classification, the soils expansion index and the design bearing capacity of the 0 • foundation Section 2905(c). • 0 0 • 0 0 0 • • 36. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, . grading plan and specifications have.been reviewed and that ithas been • determined that the recommendations in the soil report are properly incorporated into the plans (when required by the soil report). • 4 - Carlsbad 95-1636 11/29/95 37 [IF APPLICABLE] The soils engineer recommended that he/she review the foundation excavations. Note on the foundation plan that "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building Department foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the building official in writing that The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report, The utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and The foundation excavations comply with the intent of the soils report" 38 Complete the reference details in 5/S2 .2.m 39 Show the 5x5 braces at the braced frames per calculation sheet F60 40 Recheck all chevron braced frames with the 50% increase in load per 2710(h)4 41 Provide calculations to show how, the base moment is developed at the moment frame (see calculation sheet F28) For example, is a grade beam required with the design per 2625(d)'? 42 Indicate the metal deck ICBO approval number, verify the deck vertical load capacity, and indicate the deck welding 43. Indicate the stud spacing at the composite steel beams. Whyis the dead load so low in the typical steel beam design,.',such as in calculation sheet F62? 44 Note an A I T C Certificate of Compliance for glued laminated wood members shall be given to the building inspector prior to installation Section 2505 45 Note on the plans that hold down anchors must be tied in place prior to foundation inspection 46. Provide detail 14/S4.2 (referenced frornl.3/S4.2). Provide calculations for the new opening reinforcement 47 Provide diaphragm calculations for the new addition roof'and for grid line H lateral calculations at the addition 48 Is wall anchorage per 2310 required in detail 7/S4 1, or will the two structures have a seismic separation'? 49 Recheck the roof mounted equipment For example, recheck the new equipment locations The weight of AC9 is 1300# 50. Provide calculations for the separation of independent structures per. 2337(b)1 1 for 3R/8 times the deflection of both structures Carlsbad 95-1636 . .. . 11/29/95 ... . Provide detail 5/S4.1 (referenced from S3.2). . . . .. Note to provide fire blocks per Section 2516. (fl. . . . In buildings having floors and roofs of wood frame construction, draft stop the . - area between the ceiling and roof above so that no concealed space exceeds 9,000 s.f. and no horizontal dimension exceeds 100 L.F. Section 2516(f). ADDITIONAL . . . 54. • To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each. correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. 55. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. lf there' are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans; . Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please . . . indicate: . Yes 13 No IJ . . . . 56. The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 .. . . Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of . . 619/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any . questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Pete Fischer at Esgil Corporation, Thank you. . . . . • • ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW . . PLAN REVIEWER: Chuck Mendenhall • . • • • 57. . The grounding electrode conductor size must be 3/0 CU min for the 1200 amp S service. The single line shows a 2/0 ground NEC 250-94. • • .58. • Show the size of the transformer secondary ground conductors and specify the . . • "nearest electrode" used for each transformer secondary ground system (i.e., building steel, cold water pipe). NEC 250-26(c). .• S • • 59. Specify the wiring method you intend to use for this project (i.e., EMT, Metal • . • Flex, NMCetc.). • S . • •: -. • 60. Identify all loads proposed for the new service equipment. . . •• •• 61. Submit complete panel schedule for distribution panel "DP". . . S • - --. ...... - ... Carlsbad 954636 11/29/95 62. Provide receptacle(s) within 25 feet of HVAC equipment. UMC 509. .63. Provide multiple switch light controls so that the lighting can be reduced by one half in a uniform. pattern. The switches must be located within sight of the lights which they control. CBC Title 24, Sec 131 a-b. The lighting plans show the Low Voltage control switches within the rooms where the lighting occurs but there is nothing showing the reduction of lighting in a uniform pattern by 1/2. Specify exit signs as being self-luminous or having a- second source of power (battery or generator). This is required when two exits are required per the UBC. UBC 3314 and NEC 700-16. - . .. . Show on the plans the location of transformers T2 & T3. Show on the plans that these transformers have adequate ventilation The power plan, sheet E-4.1, shows a panel RP3 twice and a panel RP6 which is not .shown on thesingle line. Check the power plan panel locations and designations for consistency with the'single line diagram. • - Provide GFP on the service per NEC Article 230-95. Note on the plans that the service GFP. will be performance tested per San Diego. Area Newsletter 230-95. - Show on the single line diagram the feeder size and type to panel RP5A The feeder serving panel "DP" is undersized for the 400 amp circuit. Specify on plan sheet E-4.1 the distance between the MSB and panel DP. Provide a min of 4' clear per NEC Table 110-16(a) Specify the AIC rating of the service equipment and MSB. These must be protected for 30,000 amps. 73.. Specify the AIC rating of panel LP!. The fault current analysis requires a min AIC rating of 15442 amps. 74. Show on the plans the location of areas considered hazardous due to the use of explosive, flammable or flammable dust. Note on the plans that the wiring within these areas must comply with NEC Articles 501 or 502. -, Note: If you have any questions regarding this electrical plan review list please contact the plan reviewer listed above at (619) 560-1468. Note on this list ( or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans. Carlsbad 951636 : 11/29/95 PLUMBING, MECHANICAL AND ENERGY CORRECTIONS PLAN REVIEWER Glen Adamek 75. Provide data on proposed hazardous material to be stored and used. Clearly show types of material, amounts of materials, required ventilation,, cóñtainment requirements, drainage requirements, and detail required spill controls. The hazardous material technical opinion report was not provided Clearly show the amounts of each type of hazardous material to be stored and in use Clearly show where in the buildings each type of hazardous material is being stored or used. • • : C) Provide calculations for required containment in each area of the buildings. • • d) Provide a written response to show how Spill Control and Drainage are being handled.. : Provide the required manual shutoff control for ventilation equipment. For fumes or vapors that are heavier than air, exhaust shall be taken from a point within 12 inches of the floor. • 76 Clearly show the required fire rated occupancy separations . PLUMBING (UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE) 77. Show that water heater is adequately braced to resist seismic forces. Provide • two straps. One strap attop 1/3 of the tank and one strap at bottom 1/3 of the, tank. Please correct. : - • • 78 Detail required ladder access to water heaters more than 8 feet above the floor. 79. Provide complete water linesizing table showing maximum fixture units per pipe - size • • • • • • . MECHANICAL (UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE) 80. Fire rated corridorsarenot to, be used to convey air to or from rooms. Please correct. • • • S • • • S •• 81. Provide smoke detection in supply and return air ducts for required automatic shut-off controls. Please correct. • • • Carlsbad 95-1636 11/29/95 82 Detail exhaust ventilation system compliance with UMC Detail the exhaust outlet clearances Detail required exhaust ducting system support Detail required exhaust ducting system fire protection Detail required exhaust duct clearances from combustibles. Detail required exhaust duct minimum conveying velocities Ducts.conveying explosives or flammable vapors, fumes or dusts shall extend directly to the exterior of the building without entering other spaces. Please correct the spray booth exhaust: . ENERGY CONSERVATION NOTE: Plans submitted after .July 1, 1995 mustcómply with the new energy standards 83 Provide plans, calculations and worksheets to show compliance with current energy standards. Provide complete energy designs for the proposed changes in envelope, and S mechanical systems. Provide the completed:.ENV-, and MECH- formsshowing Energy compliance. : On the plans clearly show the wall and roof insulation locations, thickness, and .R-values, as per the energy design. S S Show the daylit areas and required. daylit area lighting controls for lighting in daylit areas. Title 24, Part 6, SectiOn 13i(). I 5 Completeenergy plan check will be done when complete corrected energy designs are provided S. 88. The completed and signed ENV-1, and MECH-1 forms must be imprinted on the plans Note: If you have any questions regarding this plan review list please contact. Glen Adamek at (619) 560-1468. To speed the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans Carlsbad 95-1636 V : 11/29/95 V V V DISABLED ACCESS REQUIREMENTS FOR REMODELS' V V (alterations structural repairs additions tenant improvements and occupancy changes) A. GENERAL Full access compliance is required for remodels, including: V V V V V V V 1. The specific area being remodeled, (i.e., the "new" work). V V V V - 2. Existing elements in the path of travel to the remodeled area. V V VV VV V V (a)Parking, (b)Walks, (c)Hazards, (d)Curb Ramps, (e) Ramps, (g) Stairs. Show the complying V path of travel from the parking to the entrance. V V V V V V 3.. Entrance to the remodeled area. V V V V V V V V V V V V V (a)Entrance doors, (b)Exit doors. V V V V V V V V V V V 4 V Existing sanitary facilities serving the remodeled area. V V V V V 5. V V Existing drinking fountains and.telephones serving the remodeled area. V V V VV V V V V V V • DISABLED ACCESS PARKING SPACES *The required number of accessible parking spaces is as follows per Table 31A: *1 for each 25 spaces up to 100 total spaces. Four spaces are required. V V Single spaces shall be V14'0" wide and .outlined to provide a 90" parking area and ,a 60" loading and unloading area on the passenger side of the vehicle. When more than one space is provided, in lieu of providing a'14'0" V V space for each space, two spaces can be provided within a 23'0" area with a 5'O" loading zone between each V 9'0" wide space. Each space is to be a' minimum of"! 8'0" in depth. See section 3107A(b)1. V V V V NOTE: See Figures 31-18A, 31-18Band.31-18C. V V V V V V 3. A bumper or curb shall be.provided and located at each space to prevent encroachment of cars into the required V V . width of walkways per section 3107A(b)3. V V V V The maximum slope of parking- surfaces in any* direction shall not exceed 1/4" /4 per foot (2.083°Io) per section V V 3107.1(b)4. The maximum slope at the passenger loading zone shall not exceed 2%. 5.V VParking spaces shall be identified by a reflectorized sign permanently posted immediately adjacent to and visible V V V V from each space, consisting of a profile view of a wheelchair with occupant in white on dark blue background. V The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area and, when in a path of travel; shall be posted at a V V V V minimum height of 80" from the bottom of the sign to parking space finished grade. Signs may also be centered V V VV V on the wall:of the interior end of the parking space at a minimum height of 36" from the parking space finished grade, ground or sidewalk. Spaces complying with section 3107A(b)2 shall have an additional sign 'Van- Accessible" mounted below the symbol of accessibility per section 3107A(c). In addition, each accessible space V V V . is required to be marked with the international symbol of accessibility. V 6. V An additional sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place at each entrance to off street parking facilities, or V V immediately adjacent.to and visible from each stall or space. The sign shall be not less than 17" by 22" with V lettering not less than 1" in height. Per section 3107A(c) required wording is as fàllows: V V V V V "Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not displaying distinguishing V V . placards ,r license plates issued for persons with disabilities may be towed away at owner's V V V expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed at or by telephoning V V 7 *A minimum of one in every 8 accessible spaces shall be served by an access aisle 96" minimum width and V V shall be designated van accessible per section 3107A(b)2. All such spaces may be grouped on one level of a V parking structure. Carlsbad 95-1636 -. 0 11 /29/95 - •' . CURB RAMPS 8.. Curb ramps shall be constructed at each corner of street intersections and where a pedestrian way crosses a curb per section 3106A(e). -Show the required curb ramp locations Show the curb ramp reqUirements on the plans if there are no curb ramps. .' '• WALKS, SIDEWALKS AND RAMPS 9. Show all requirements on,, the plans if the "existing path of travel does not comply.' If pedestrian ramps are required, show all ramp slopes, landing dimensions, handrail locations, etc. - e DOORS - - - 10 Per section 3304(f) every required passage door shall have a minimum 32' clear width See door 108 ' - - :. f SPECIAL HAZARDS (NOTE ON THE PLANS) 11. • Objects projecting from walls with their leading edges between 27" and 80" above the finished floor shall protrude no more than4" into walks, halls, corridors,, passageways or aisles: Objects mounted at or below 27" - above the finished floor may protrude- any amount. Freestanding objects mounted on posts or pylons may overhang 12" maximum from 27" to 80" above' the ground surface or finished floor. STAIRWAYS AND HANDRAILS . - ., 12. ' Handrails are required on each side of stairs, per section 3306(i.1)1. 13. The upper approach and the lower tread of each stair shall be marked by a strip of clearly contrasting color at - least 2" wide and placed parallel to and not more than 1" from the 'nose of the step or landing. The strip shall be - as slip resistant as the other treads of the stair. For exterior stairs, the upper approach and all treads shall be marked. 14. *Tread surfaces shall. be slip resistant and smooth, rounded or chamfered exposed edges and no abrupt edges' at the nosing. Nosing shall not project more than 111211 past the face of the riser above. Risers shall be solid (open risers are not permitted). . SANITARY FACILITIES ' . • . ' . .' . - 15. Doorways leading to.men's sanitary -facilities shall be identified by an equilateral triangle 1/4I thick with edges 12" long and a vortex pointing upward., Women's facilities shall be identified by a circle, 1/411 thick, 12" in diameter. Unisex facilities' shall be identified by a circle with a triangle superimposed on the circle . ' and, within, the 12" diameter. The required symbols shall be centered on the door at a height of 60". *See section 3105A(b)1.D. See . 3105A(e)10 foradditional signage. *As per, section. 3105A(b)3.B., there shall be a clear floor space at least 60" in diameter, or a T-shaped space as shown in Figure 31-12 (a) and (b). Doors are not permitted to encroach- into this space. - • ., • DRINKING FOUNTAINS AND TELEPHONES - . • - Where water fountains are provided they shall comply with section 3105A(d)1: . • . . S a) Water fountains shall be located completely in an alcove or otherwise so positioned so as to not encroach into pedestrian ways. • • '• •• • - b) The alcove in which the water fountain is located shall not be' . less than 32" in width and 18" in depth. - • c) See section 1507 of the California Plumbing Code for additional requirements.. 0 • , •, 18. • - Where public telephones, or public pay phones, are provided they shall comply with the requirements of section • -: • 3105A(d)2. . 0 - • • Carlsbad 95-1636 11/29/95 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 95-1636 PREPARED BY: Pete Fischer ., DATE: 11/29/95 BUILDING ADDRESS: 1979 Palomar Oaks, Way BUILDING OCCUPANCY: B2, A3? • • • i TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN SPR BUILDING PORTION BUILDING AREA. VALUATION •• . . VALUE. • •. (sq..ft.) . MULTIPLIER • • Addition and Remodel VALUE PER CITY APPLICATION •. 450,000 Air Conditioning • : ___________________ ___________________ Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE • • . • • 450,000. • -I - -.-• V V V. - .- V. 'V.- 'V - BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST . * '4..' 4 '. •' V-V - - - SITE PLAN . 1c62ndv' 3rd' IJ 0 0 1 Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale Show Al - - - -. '. -. r- - I I- •VV A North Arrow '. D Property Lines Easements B '- Existing & Proposed Structures E Easements / C Existing Street Improvement ,F Right-of-Way Width & Adjacent Streets,. . i\Z - .. V • V- - V. 4 - - -, V •. [0 D'2..Shaw on site plan , I '- Drainage. Patterns C. Existing Topography - B Existing & Proposed Slopes V:-- 0 0 3 lnclue note "Surface water to be directed away from the building foundation at a.2% gradient for no less than 5' or 2/3 the distance to the property line (whichever is less)" [Per 1985 UBC 2907(d)5] On graded sites, the top of any exterior foundationshall extend above the elevation / of the street gutter at point of discharge or the inlet of an approved drainage device / a 'Minimum.of 12 inches p us two percent"'(per 1990 UBC 2907(d)5) L2J" V.0 0 4 lncluJe on title sheet A Site address B Assessor's Parcel Number . / C Legal Description For commercial/industrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, include Total building square footage with the square footage for each different use, existing sewer Permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing, warehouse, office, etc) previously approved.- , - EXISTING. PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION ' -V VV '• _'rV -, ...' .. V -- -. isp-V_V * V 'A - •'. s''. . ,. - V .- 4 I - . - . - .. 7 - - . - - - - V V ' ,- •-- -.r-, -_ . V -. ' •' '-7 - - P - •I' •V 1V• •V -. . t. . ', I. • - - V V ' V ir I I ( t V_V -I- 4' V V •VVV 'V. .- V V ' V . - •. - V V - , V 1' •5,4 ' -V P \DOCS\CHKL.ST\BP000l FRU ' Page 1 of 4 4 . REV 05/11/94 'VV 4VV' V ,V ,V V - VV V'• •V - . VV , ,V j S. ,. 'S .. S. , 0 BUILDING PNCHECK CHECKLIST '- I" DISCREtIONARYAPRbVAL COMPLIANCE 1 s'W 2n' 3rd./ : 0 5. Project Conditions were complied with by Date DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS , ..• • . 0 6.1 Dedication for all Street Rights-of-Way 'adjacent to the building site and any storm drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and for remodels with a value "at or exceeding $_.: -pursuant to Code Section 1840030 'bedication' required as .folIovC:- -, ' -• . - ' - 1 - - 'S . - .- •4 S Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process Provide the completed application form and the requirements on the checklist at the time of resubmittal 0 Dedication completed by Date:___________ IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS 0 7a All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be 'constructed at time of building construction whe'never the value5 of the construction exceeds $ -pursuant to Code Section 1840040 Public improvements required as follows S ' - -:• - S.C . . • : • - - .• S • ' 0 Please have a registered Cavil Engineer prepare appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with, the requirements on the attached checklist forá separate . plancheck process through the Engineering Department Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of permit Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public improvements requirements Provide the completed application form and the requirements on the checklist at the time of resubmittal improvement Plans.signed by: Date: _________ - •. 4 - S •'• :- - - 0 • -:' • - --- . -- .- . S '4 P \DOCs\cHkLs1\BP0001 FRM 'V Page 2 of 4 REV 05/11/94 r . " .4 '. BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIT' 1 SW 2fldv' 3rd/. '4: -• . -. - . - El .0 0 7b;' Construction of the public improvements may be deferred, pursuant to code Section: ,.." 18.40. Please submit a 'recent .property title report or current grant deed on the, = . pioperty and procesing fe&of'$_. -. " so .we 'may prepare the necessary Future Improvement Agreement jhis agreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building Permit 4 .'. 4. --1 .. . . ...' .7 .4 .4 •. Future public improvements required as follows .--: '•.- '' --- . I - . . 4 7 . 4 - Improvement Plans signed by __. '.. . . ' - Date:.' O 0 0 7c Enclosed please find your Future Improvement Agreement Please return signed and notarized Agreement to the Engineering Department Future Improvement Agreement 'completed by: .7 4 Date:' :'- I321 ' 0 0 7d No"Public Improvements required SPECIAL' NOTE Damaged or defective 4' improvements found adiacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction of the City Inspector prior to occupancy . GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS Olt 4 The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section 11 06030 - of the Municipal Code ' . 12 0 0 8a '. Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading requirements Include accurate grading quantities (cut, fill import, export) I 4, El 0 0 8b Grading Permit required A 'sip rite grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer mut be Submitted together with the completed application form attached NOTE The Grading Permit must be issued and rough grading approval obtained prior. / to issuance of a Building Permit / . . ... . _4'..• , ,,...-. Grading Inspector sign off by: Date: 4 .4 4 4.7.44 4 I21 0 0 8c No Grading Permit required ..- '.4 - -. 4...-. .4,• 7 - ,. J,, , 4 . .4 '4 * ,' 4 - '. . , .7. .4 . ' . , . '' . - . 4 • , •. ' .4. .4 .4. 74 , '?' .7 4 .7.. • ,- .4 --, -7 . 4 . . .4 - - . . . .4,4 ' .,_, 4, /4 4' P:\DOCS\CHKLST FRM 4' Page 3 of 4 ' REV 05/11/94 V • V V • . V I .:, - - •VVV - . t- 9 V V - V -S - . .V - 5 •. j 2r BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS ' dvI 3rdf 0 9 A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is 're4uired to do work in City Right-of-Way and/on 4 private work adjacent to the public Right-of-Way. Types of work include, but are not limited to Street improvements, trees, driveways, tieing into public storm drain, sewer, and water utilities 4 4 ' Vp -p-V Right-of-Way permit required for A separate Right-of-Way permit issued by the Engineering Department is required for the following: 0 0 10 A SEWER PERMIT is required concurrent with the buildin.'g perm'it-'issuance The fee is noted in the fees section on the following page 0 ii INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT is required.,Applicant must complete Industrial Waste Permit Application Form and submit for City approval prior to issuance of a Permit. • V • 'T :Industrial waste pe rmit accepted by: Date OL P \DOcS\CHKLs1\Bp000l FRU Page 4 of 4 REV 05/11/94 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING REVIEW SECTION FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET 0 Estimate basd on unconfirmed information from applicant. -. Calculation based on building plancheck plan submittal. Address: iqi 9 P0,16,-or 0ahS lULj . Bldg. Permit No. C6 75/' -,3 60 Prepared by:fl1ffl4 e:t1Vo/'j S Checked by: Date:: A)/b/41;1 _________________ EDU CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all use. . .. / Types of Use: Sq. Ft./Units: _I, O I S EDUs:__________________ Total EDU's: 35 ADT CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses.. - .------.-- Types of Use: Sq. Ft./Units:, C 25 XDT`s:______oil- ___________ Total ADTs 1(T) FEES REQUIRED: - • : •. PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE REQUIRED $. YES 0 NO (See Building Department for amount) WITHIN CFD: 0 YES (no bridge & thoroughfare fee, NO reduced Traffic Impact Fee) - 1.PARK-IN-LIEU FEE PARK AREA:________ •' FEE/UNIT: X NO UNITS: =$_____________ ~~23RAFFIC IMPACT FEE : ADt's/UNITS: JO X FEE/ADT: =$c::4.o BRIDGE AND THOROUGHFARE FEE - ADTs/UNITS:I6) X FEE/ApT:________ FACILITIES MANAGEMENT FEE ZONE:_________ SQ FT 01 7 (4 0 X FEE/SQ FT 5. SEWER FEE PERMIT N05 4?(aaz'7 EDU's: X FEE/EDU:L 'O(0 =J?..tt'. :. BENEFIT AREA: DRAINAGE BASIN: 00 EDU's: 5t7 S x FEE/EDU_ =s 'c C4LDRAINAGE FEES PLDA () : HIGH /LOW * 1 ACRES X FEE/AC: =$ __(3 4~,~SEWER LATERAL ($2,500 DEPOSIT) =$______________ ;8 WATER FEE EDU S X FEEJEDU cj 400 =J2 TOTAL OF ABOVE FEES* $_____________ *NOTE This calculation sheet Is NOT a complete flat of all fees which may be due 4 o 9 Dedications and Improvements may also be required with Building Permits. P:\D0CS\MISF0RMS\BP0002.FRM REV 01/04/95 PLANNING Q1EOU1ST Plan Check No 1%Addresi JC777 (CW Tk) L], I Planner DAVID RICK Phone 438-1161 ext. 4328 (Name) APN:t Type of Project and Use -- aSId PT t ZOne 0>11 Facilities Management Zone (YD (inI __ c(1e' (1 property in, complete SPECIAL TAX CALCULATION c1 WORKSHEET provided by Building Department.) ;•.. - [tern Complete [tern Incomplete Needs your action 1, 2, 3 Number in circle indicates plan check number where deficiency was 1 A", identified $ EnvonmntaIRview Rqinred. YESO _AE DATE OF COMPLETION: - Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require acnoi Conditions of Approval ' \ 01;4 Dr Action Required: 10 r Rv6e APPROVALJRESO NO DATE l. PROJECT NO OTHER RELATED CASES-.- :,.,I gompHance with conditions of pproval? If not, state conditions which require action Conditions of Approval - California Cbastal Coon Per t Required:- S O DATE OF APPROVAL San Diego Coast District, 3111 Canino Del Rio North, Suite 200, San Diego, CA. 92108-1725 (619) 521-8036 Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state condition's which require act on. Conditions of Approval • • -4 C - cIusionazy Housing ee nred YES NO (Effective date of (nclusidithyHo'jisin Ordinance May 21t'1993) r 4N 4 Site L-i Li LI I Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale Shdw North 'arrow, property., lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, - streets existing street AMprovements, right-of-way width, dimensioned I setbacks4 and existing 'tópographical lines - ..C.• -5 555 Povide legal descnp&n of property, and assessor's parcel number' I....................... Zoning * . 1 Setbacks I' Front Required 3 Shown 7r' 1- - Int., Side , .. Required (0 Shown IC) Street Side . Required " Shown 14/J- Rear - Required 20 Shown Z' ~ 5k• - C. 5C I 2 Lot cov'eage Required • ____ Shown 76 0 'C 3 Height .. T2-k,. Required Shown 22-' :5._I .• -. S.. IC- "0 4 Parking ' Spaces Required Shown Guest Spaces Required Shown Additional Comments L-* Ob- I (J 9 c4t&i-t u"1tJ. 'roposeA r of rp1-r -- - seéI 1o'-.- 4/lc yi. -- S. -. - - . -• OKCTO:LSSUEIANDCENTERED,APPROVALINTO COMPUTER DATE AI PLNCKFRM - C - •. - .. - - -': * 5- - 5. - 7 4 . . -. -. . 47 44$4. .1 .C.!44 4., - - S..... • F. -+ - - S ' C : .- ' * 'C • I C' SCHUMACHER January 16, 1996 Pete Fischer Structural Plan Checker Esgil Corporation 9320 Chesapeake Drive Suite 208 San Diego, CA 92123 Re: Schumacher building 1979 Liquefaction Potential M/BA Project No. 95001 Dear Mr. Fischer: I have read the Geotechnics Incorporated letter describing the potential hazards associated With the liquefiable soil on our site. It is clear that the soil characteristics currently exist with our facilities as well as the whole development along Palomar Oaks Way. This is a potential hazard that we currently accept. We have no problems with the expansion of our, facilities on our land and acknowledge the risk. As a result of the soils conditions, Schumacher accepts the potential risk caused by soil liquefaction during a seismic event. .• Sincerely, S SCHUMACHER H' Todd Helseth Facility Manager TAHJaeo A Unit of Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. 1969 Palomar Oaks Way • Carlsbad, CA 92009 (619) 931-9555 216 Fax (619) 931-7819 lblex'910-322-1382 1-800-545.9241 California Only 1-800-545-9242 Continental U.S.A. - ' 95257 City of Carlsbad Fire 'Department . Bureau of Prevention Plan Review Requirements Category Building Plan Check Date of Report--Tuesday, January 23 1996 Reviewed by Contact Name Kennàn Baldwin 0 Address 701 B Street Ste 200 City, State San Diego CA 92101 •- * S 4tBldDtNo 95-1636 Planning No Job Name Schu'macher 0 S S Job Address,1979 Palomér Oaks -. Ste. or Bldg. No. Approved; The item you have submitted for review has been approved The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your subdiittal, therefore any changes-to these items afte'r this date, including field modifica- tions, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this reporican result in suspension of. permit to construct or install improvements. U Disapproved - Please see the attached report of deficiencies Please make corrections to - plans or specifications necessary to indicate áompliance with applicable S codes and standards. Submit ôorre'cted plans and/or specifications to this I office for review. 0 . - I - S • S _ S • •S, - •0 S ., ... -- -5 ._•.•0 - -- 0 - S S - 5*. -S For Fire Department Use Only 3rd Review 1st 2nd * 5 Other Agehcy ID S CFD Job# 95257 File#___________ 2560 Orion Way • Carlsbad, California 92008 • (619) 931-2121 - *5 DASSE DESIGN SOUTHERN CALffORNIAINC - -4- IRVINE - LL 4 --- DATEJ7jL1L 1-- -- ---- -a-- -CKD 'DATE.- 41 -- - - -1-- -- .- -- _1_ -tl --. - -i-- ---- -H I I i I I I - ---'I— - - -- .(t 12 12 LII)I )2 A_6L, 6! iLi .4 L-L-LLL1_L4_j- -J-.H 1- L4J ±1±LH-JF rr[--TH :uJi±i --- --HHH- - - - 4---A~k - (L400 4--H-I--1 -I--H -- ---H-H----t-f-H- 4-± H ( t I Iff*HIcz i 1 : I - ----- ---:---r tIT •.•I . - I ••. • 'N2 FORM LOK LIGHT WEIGHT CONCRETE (110 pcI) GALVANIZED OR PHOSPHATIZED/PAINTED TOTAL_j..L. .• .•...".•.__±_4 SLAB DEPTH 2 4 WELDS TOTAL SLAB DEPTH SPAN & CONCRETE DECK GAGE OF SPANS ________ 7'-O 7'-6" 8'-O 8'-6 10'-0" 1O'-6 11-Os 11'-6" 12'-O WT. psi &WT . PS 1 255 227 TTh. 156... :. 140 113 . 102 92 83 . 76 22 2 255 227 204 185 .. 140 9'-0" t1330 113 102 92 83 76 3 255 227 204 185 168 113 102 . 92 83 76 q 1450 1420 1400 1370 1350 1320 1300 1290 1280 1270 1.8 F .57 .58 .59 .60 .61 .62 .63 .64 .65 .65 1 286 255 229 i78 160 129 117 106 97 88 21 2 286 255 229 207 188 172 129 117 106 97 88 3 286 255 229 207 188 172 150 117 106 97 88 q 1480 1450 1420 1390 1370 1350 1330 1310 1300 1280 1270 2.0 F .53 .54 .55 .56 .57 .58 .59 .60 .60 .61 .62 1 317 282 254 229 :, 180 .. 162 . 146 133 117 103 90 20 2 317 282 254 229 208 182 156 ,. 133 117 103 90 3 317 282 254 229 208 182 156 135 117 103 . 90 4 ,, 2 1 q 1510 1470 1440 1410 1390 1370 1350 1330 1310 1300 1290 F .50 .51 .52 .53 .54 .55 .56 .57 .57 .58 .58 1 380 339 305 272 229 194 167 . 144 .• 125 110 97 27.5 19 2 380 339 305 272 229 194 167 144 125 110 97 3 380 339 305 272 229 194 167 144 125 110 97 2.4 q 1580 1540 1500 1470 1440 1410 1390 1370 1350 1330 1310 F .44 .45 .46 .47 .48 .49 .50 .51 .52 .53 .53 1 400 388 342 285 240 204 175 151 131 115 101 18 2 400 388 342 285 240 204 175 151 131 115 101 3 400 388 342 285 240 204 175 151 131 115 101 2.7 q 1630 1590 1550 1510 1480 1450 1420 1400 1380 1360 1340 F .40 .42 .43 .44 .44 .45 .46 .47 .48 .49 .49 1 400 388 348 308 267 226 194 168 146 128 113 16 2 400 388 348 308 267 226 194 168 146 128 113 3 400 388 348 308 267 226 194 168 146 128 113 3.3 q 1780 1720 1670 1630 1590 1550 1520 1490 1460 1430 1410 F .33 .34 .35 .36 .37 .38 .39 .40 .40 .41 .42 1 288 225 198 176 157 141 127 114 103 94 85 22 2 288 257 231 208 157 141 127 114 103 94 85 3 288 257 281 208 190 141 127 114 103. 94 85 1.8 q 1610 1580 1550 1530 .1510 1490 1480 1460 1450 1430 1420 F .51 .52 .53 .54 .54 .55 .56 .57 .57 .58 .58 21 I 1 2 322 322. 287 .287. .226 258 .201 .233 180 .212 161 161 146 .146 132 .132 119 119 109 .109 99 . .99 3 322 287 258 233 212 194 146 132 119 109 99 2.0 q 1640 1610 1580 1550 1530 1510 1490 1470 1460 1440 1430 11 ________ F .48 .49 .50 .51 .51 .52 .53 .54 .54 .55 .55 20 41 F 1 2 357 357 318 318 286 286 258 258 202 235 182 215 165 165 149 149 136 136 124 124 113 113 1 2 32.1 3 357. 318 286 258 235 215 197 180 136 124 113 2.1 q 1670 1630 1600 1570 1550 1530 1510 1490 1470 1450 . 1440 F .45 .46 .47 .48 .48 .49 .50 .51 .51 .52 .52 19 1 2 400 400 382 382 343 343 310 310 282 282 236 257 204 231 185 200 169 169 152 .152 134 134 1 HOUR 3 400 382 343 310 282 257 231 200 173 152 134 FIRE 2.4 q 1730 1690 1650 1620 1590 1560 1540 1520 1500 1480 1470 ________ F .40 .41 .42 .43 .44 .45 .45 .46 .46 .47 .47 RATING tO 1 2 400 400 400 400 391 391 354 1 354 322 322 279 283 235 243 210 210 T 182 182 160 160 140 140 3 400 400 391 354 322 283 243 210 182 160 140 2.7 g 1790 1740 1700 1660 1630 1600 1580 1560 1540 1520 1500 .40 .41 1 .42 .43 .43 .44 .44 F .37 .38 .40 16 1 2 400 400 400 - 400 390 390 352 352 320 320 293 293 269 269 232 232 202 202 177 177 155 155 3.3 q 400 1940 400 1880 390 1830 352 1780 320 1740 293 1700 269 1670 232 1640 202 1620 177 1590 155 1570 F .30 .31 .32 .33. .34 .35 .35 .36 .36 .37 .37 Shoring required in shaded areas. 12 VERCO ALLOWABLE SUPERIMPOSED LOADS(Lbs./Sq. Ft.), DIAPHRAGM SHEAR VALUES (q) (Lbs./L.F.) AND FLEXIBILITY FACTORS (F) NUMBER 11 DASSE DESIGN SOUThERN CALIFORNIA,'.'C ................................................................................................... IRVINE PROJECTI0±3 PAGE BY - DATEJ/c I : . . T _ ...•._ . 4 . CKDBY DATE-—. ti !H NOTES: 1. 1. OPENING DIMENSIONS ARE ROUGH SIZE. . r 2. VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS WITH ARCHITECT. [..± 3. VERIFY THAT THERE WILL BE ONLY ONE NEW OPENING PER (E) PANEL. ADDITIONAL OPNG. (E) 6 CONC. PANEL (EXISTING OR NEW) IN THE SAME PANEL WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. (E) PILASTER (E) LEDGER - - ............TS6x6x16 4 PLACES FOR ATTACHMENT TO WALL SEE r13 WALL ELEVEVATION AT P. 0 SAWCUT OPENINGS TtTTT jDASSEDESIGNSOUTHERNCALIF9R1IAINC.j 4• ---Li ----- ----- _PRCU Ed I_PAGE - T_4 rTT BVN4_ DATEJZ14 -- --k- --- - ---I----- KDBY-±--= -- - I I 7i 1ifi?I 11 -- 0.01) Uô4-o- kill J.L LL LiL L: :L. .1iIi!?II If I --.-- Hc t1 * H±EH Hh HH_ IiJ11J, 1I41i 1J I4I ---. -Th 1TJ± 1 1 L 1hTJ ± I t1tii -f--- - - - - -- - - - -' -' :j : - -- - d4 x0Y - - - - 1 DASSE DESIGN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC - J --PROJECTi 34AGE44 :4 - -- - -- BY- CK DATE - -- -- -------- -- 12 i ~Lf WWI 4 1 frH±++-r---±-- ---4---+— —4--+-----+-- ----- I I --•-i —•-t— ----- I__I , 2.1 H - Lj ir —r--r-- iTA L '_4y 1 1 1 C i9 pL LDS1 ----H W)L I44 0 J-0 LJ2JcJ PLY T - - 1--- -H -± 1 T 1 IJ 1t Aw • '.- c - (c-) ) I / • - it •L 4i • • • • c7c C- (i •' -- Apw i o /s- TABLE 23-1-J-1 —ALLOWABLE SHEAR IN POUNDS PER FOOT FOR HORIZONTAL WOOD STRUCTURAL PANEL DIAPHRAGMS WITH FRAMING OF DOUGLAS FIR-LARCH OR SOUTHERN PINE' BLOCKED DIAPHRAGMS UNBLOCKED DIAPHRAGMS Nail spacing (In.) at diaphragm boundaries (all cases), at continuous panel edges parallel to load (Cases 3 and 4) and at all panel edges Nails spaced 6" (152 mm) max. (Cases 5 and 6) at supported edges x 25.4 for mm -MINIMUM 6 , 4 j 21122 1 22 PANEL GRADE COMMON NAIL SIZE MINIMUM NAIL PENETRATION IN FRAMING (Inches)' MINIMUM NOMINAL PANEL ThICKNESS (Inches) NOMINAL WIDTHOF FRAMING MEMBER (Inches) 1(No ' unblocked edges or 'continuous joints paralleltoload) All other -- configurations (Cases 2,3,4, 5 and 6) - Nailspacing In at other anel edges p Case x for mm ' . 6 4— 3 x 25.4 for mm ' x 0.0146 for N/mm - ' 6d 11/4 /16 2 - 3' 185 210 . 250 . 280 .375 420 420 475 165 . 185 125 140 Structural i , 8d . 11/2 /8 2 3 270 300 360 400 .530 600' 600 675 240 265 180 200' 10d3 . 1/5 /32- 2 - 3 '32O' 30 425 480 640 720 730 ' 820 285, 320 215 240 , - 110 6d 11/4 /16 2 3 170 . 190 225 -250 335 - 380 380 430 - 150 1,70 - 125 -/8 2 3 185 210 250 - 280 375 420 420 475' 165 185 125 140 C-D,C-C, /8 2 3 240 270 320 360 480 540 545 610 215 240 160 180 Sheathing, and other grades covered in U.B.C. 8d -/2 ' - 2 3-285-- 255 ' - 340 380 - 505 - 570 575 645 230 - 255 :' ' 170 190 15 • 2 3 270 300 360 400 530 600 600 - 675 240 265 180' 200 Standard 23-3 or 23-9 10d3 15/8 /32 2 3 290 325 ''385 - 430 575 650 655 .735 255 . ' 290 190 215 - 19/32 ' 2 3 320 .360 - 425 480 640 720 ' 730 820 . 285 - 320 215 240 1These values are for short-time loads due to wind or earthquake and must be reduced 2.5 percent for normal loading. Space nails 12 inches (305 mm) on center along intermediate framing members. Allowable shear values for nails in framing members of other species Set forth in Table 23-HI-FF of Division ill shall be calculated for all other grades by multiplying the shear capacities for nails in Structural 1 by the following factors: 0.82 for species with specific gravity greater than or equal 100.42 but less than 0.49. and 0.65 for species specific. gravity less than 042 Ito ' ' I IC -Iz 0 2Framing at adjoining panel edges shall be 3-inch (76 mm) nominal or wider and nails shall be staggered where nails are spaced 2 inches (51 mm) or 21/2 inches (64 mm) on center. 31'raming at adjoining panel edges shall be 3-inch (76mm) nominal or wider and nails shall be staggered where lOd nails having penetration into framing of more than 15/8 inches (41 mm) are spaced 3 inches (76 mm) or less on center. , z C) C) 0 Load _CASE1 _Framing 'CASE2 _eLocetito r uso CASE 3 _ Load _CASE4 ' l~w 21 1_11_111 l I 114-i\AHHI 4 ___________________ DIAPHRAGM BOUNDARY I Continuous panel joints Load, _CASE 5Framing ioa _" _CASE 6Framing Widints Continubus pane: joints --- Blocking - Continuous pa Blocking to to C z '1 0 M. I- z C) 0 0 0 M NOTE: Framing may be oriented in either direction for diaphragms, provided sheathing is properly designed for vertical loading. ICBO Evaluation Service Inc. mtnLrn.G S - .f 5360 WORKMAN MILL ROAD •. WHITTIER, CALIFORNIA 90601-2299 A subsidiary corporation of the International Conference of Building Officials EVALUATION REPORT ' Report No.4144 Copyright 1994 ICBO Evaluation Service, Inc. o i December, 1994 Filing Category: ROOF, WALL AND FLOOR PANELS—Wood (216) 447 PLYWOOD DECK DIAPHRAGMS AND SHEAR WALLS ATTACHED WITH .Nos. VIII through XI. The maximum shearwail height-width ratio is 31/2:1. ERICO PNEUMATIC FASTENERS Shear wall deflections may be computed using the equation in Section ERICO TOOL & FASTENERS, INC. 25.923 of U.B.C. Standard 25-9. For determination of e0 in that equation, 29019 SOLON ROAD see Table No. XIV. SOLON, OHIO 44139 . D. Wood and Plywood Attached to Steel: Erico fasteners may be used Subject: Plywbod Deck Diaphragms and Shear Walls Attached with to fasten wood and plywood to steel framing members. Fastener informa- Erico Pneumatic Fasteners. tion, attachment dimensions, required penetrations, and allowable loads are set forth in Tables Nos. III through VII. Description: A. General: Plywood deck diaphragms and plywood shear walls are attached to steel framing with Erico pneumatic fasteners. E. Identification: The Erich pneumatic fasteners are identified by the The fasteners are manufactured from AISi 1060 or AISi 1566 steelarid are mantflacturer's name and catalca number on the cartons and one of the heat treated to a hardness of R 52 to 54. The fasteners are electrozinc following logos or symbols on the head of each fastner: plated with a • chromate finish. They are produced in 0190-inch. 0.144-inch and 0.100-inch diameters which have 3/8-inch-, 5/16-inch- and 1/4-inch-diameter heads, respectively. Steel framing members noted as gauges in this report refer to the following thicknesses: No. i4 gauge: 0.0710inch; No. 16 gauge: 0.0553 inch; No. 18 gauge: 0.0428 inch; . No. 20 gauge: 0.0333 inch; No. 22 gauge: 0.0275 inch. -B. Plywood Deck Diaphragms: Erico pneumatic fasteners may be used to fasten code-complying plywood decks to steel framing members. Allowable shear for plywood diaphragms attached with the 0.144-inch- diameter fasteners is shown in Table No. I. Allowable shear for plywood diaphragms attached with the 0.100-inch- diameter fasteners is indicated in Tables Nos. XII and XIII. Panels noted in Tables Nos. I, XI and XIII must be capable of supporting vertical loads based on the panel span ratings indicated in Table No. 25-S-1 of the code. If diaphragm blocking is required, it must be provided as indicated in the code. The maximum diaphragm span-width ratio is 4:1. Diaphragm deflections may be computed using equation in Section 25.922 of U.B.C. Standard No. 25-9. For determination of en in that equa-tion, see Table No. XIV. C. PlywOod Shear Walls: Ericôfasteners may be used to fasten struc- tural use panels to steel framing members. 1 he allowable shear and perti- nent construction requirements are indicated in Table No. II and Tables Q G G Evidence Submitted: Full-scale horizontal diaphragm and shear wall load tests, small-scale fastener tests, descriptive details and struc- tural calculations have been submitted. Findings. Findings: That the Plywood Deck Diaphragms and Shear Walls attached with Erico Pneumatic Fasteners comply with the 1991 Uniform Building CodeTM, subject to the following conditions: The allowable shear values for the plywood horizontal dia- phragms and plywood shear walls can not exceed valuesnoted In Tables Nos. I, II, and VIII through XIII. Individual fastener attachment allowable values can not exceed those set forth in Tables Nos. Ill through VII. Limitations based on deflections of horizontal diaphragms and shear walls must be considered in design. 1993 Accumulative Supplement to the U.S.C.: Thisreport is unaffected by the sjpplerncnt. This report Is subject to re-examination In one year. Evaluation reports of ICBO E valuation Service. Inc., are issued solely to provide information to Class A members Of IC6O, utilizing the code upon which the report is based. Evaluation reports are not to be construed as representing aesthetics or any other attributes not spec.ficaliy addressed nor as an endorsement or recommen-dation for use of the subject report. This report is based upon independent tests or other technical data submitted by the applicant. The ICBO Evaluation Service, Inc.; technical staff has reviewed the test results and/or other data, but does not possess test facilities to make an independent verification. There is no warra?uy by ICBO Evaluation Service, Inc., express or implied, as to any "Finding" or other matter in the report oras to any product covered by the report. This disclaimer includes, but is not limited to, merchantability. Page 1 of 6 Page 2of6 Report No. 4144 TABLE NO. I—ALLOWABLE SHEAR VALUES IN POUNDS PER FOOT FOR HORIZONTAL PLYWOOD DIAPHRAGMS WITH STEEL FRAMING AND ERICO 0.144 INCH-DIAMETER FASTENERS1.2.7.8 - BLOCKED DIAPHRAGMS--FASTENER SPACING5 UNBLOCKED DIAPHRAGMSS. PANEL MINIMUM PANEL THICKNESS (Inches) FRAMING WIDTHS (Inches) 6 4 21! 2 Case 1 Case 24 6 5 4 3 IV' 2'/ 315 355 420 470 630 710 840 945 - 280 315 210 235 STRUCTURAL '32 IV 2V2 395 445 525 590 790 890 1.055 1.185 350 395 265 295 ]:/2 285 320 380 425 565 635 755 845 .250. 285 190 210 "32 2'/2 355 400 475 535 710 800 905 905 315 355 235 . 265 RATED SHE TH A ING '9 /32 Ill, 21/2 385 435 515 580 775 870 970 970 345 385 260 290 IV, 21/ 385 435 515 580 775 870 1.030 1.160 '45 385 260 290 2'/2 400 450 530 600 800 895 1.065 1.195 355 . 400 265 300 tThese values are for short-time loads due to wind or earthquake and must be reduced 25 percent for normal loading. 2The pin must be long enough to penetrate througI the thickness of the support a minimum of 1/4 inch. . . 3A11 framing is minimum No. 14 gauge steel, except as noted in Footnote 4. . 47bese values are for diaphragms with minimum No. II gauge framing. . 5For fastener spacing and case description see U.B.C. Table No. 25-J-1. 6Maximum fastener spacing at 6 inches on center. 7Spacing of fasteners along intermediate framing members is 12 inches on center. . 87he minimum panel edge distance is inch. . TABLE NO. It—ALLOWABLE SHEAR VALUES IN POUNDS PER FOOT FOR PLYWOOD SHEAR WALLS WITH STEEL FRAMING AND ERICO 0.144-INCH-DIAMETER FASTENERS1'23.4.5 MINIMUM PANEL - FASTENER SPACING (Inches on center) THICKNESS FRAMING SPACING 6 4 3 2 PANEL (inches) (inches on center) 24 230 345 460 585 16 280 . 420 560 . 715 APA STRUCTURAL I '7/16 24 445 .7 300 5 7() 16 16 330 490 655 835 /32 16 or 24 350 525 705 895 I,, . 16 or 24 375 560 745 950 3a6 24 y 205 310 415 525 16 250 380 505 645 APA-RATED SHEATHING I6 24 270 400 535 . 685 AND SIDING 7 16 16' 795 440 . . . . .750 16or24 . . . -- - 630 -- -- 805, 16 or 24 335 .315.....475 505 670 .855 9/32 16 or 24 345 515 690 875 1These values are for short-time loads due to wind or earthquake and must be reduced 25 percent for normal loading. 2The pin must be long enough to penetrate through the thickness of the support a minimum of 1/4 inch. 3Steel framing must be minimum No.: 14 gauge with minimum flange width of 1112 inches. 'Spacing of fasteners along intermediate framing members is 12 inches on center. 5The minimum panel edge distance is 3, inch. 'Spacing of these fasteners along intermediate framing members is 6 inches on center. TABLE NO. III—ALIOWABLE LATERAL VALUES IN POUNDS PER FASTENER DUE TO WIND OR SEISMIC LOADS FOR WOOD1 OR PLYWOOD SHEATHING2'4 ATTACHED TO STEEL FRAMING WITH ERICO FASTENERS3 CATALOG NUMBER SHANK TYPE SHANK DIAMETER MINIMUM STEEL THICKNESS MINIMUM THICKNESS OF LUMBER AND/OR STRUCTURAL PANELS 3/5 71- ISj 23/32r11 1110- AKN Knurled 0.144 14 gauge 155 185 195 215 215 215 215 ASM Smooth .0144 II gauge 155 185 195 215 220 220 220 ASM Smooth 0.144 3,1 155 185 195 215 220 240 240 ASM Smooth 0 4 t/4 155 185 195 215 220 245 245 ASD Step Down 0.190 311 - - 260 330 375 390 390 tWood must have specific gravity of 0.51 or greater. 2Plywood sheathing must be Structural I-rated sheathing: for rated sheathing values must be reduced 10 percent. 3These values are for loads due Iowind or earthquakeand must be reduced by 25 percent for other applications. 'Minimum panel edge distance is 3/X inch. - Page 3 of 6 V :, .. Report No 4144 TABLE NO. IV—ALLOWABLE LATERAL VALUES IN POUNDS PER FASTENER DUE TO WIND OR SEISMIC LOADS FOR WOOD' OR PLYWOOD SHEATHING24 ATTACHED TO STEEL FRAMING. WITH ERICO FASTENERS3 . 'V V CATALOG NUMBER SHANK TYPE SHANK DIAMETER MINIMUM STEEL THICKNESS MINIMUM THICKNESS OF LUMBER AND'OR STRUCTURAL PANELS 3'e 'lie' 19133 133 I AKN Knurled 0.144 14 gauge hO 130' 135 175 185 185 . 185 ASM Smooth 0.144 11 gauge 110 130 135 175 185. . 190 190 ASM Smooth 0.144 110 130 135 , 175 185 190 195 ASD Step Down 0.190 /16' - 180 230 , 280 - 320 320 tVal ues in this table are limited to lumber with specific gravity in the range of 0.42 and 0.50. V V V V 2Plywood sheathing must be Structural I-sheathing; for rated sheathing values must be reduced 10 percent. V V V These values are for loads due to wind or earthquake and must be reduced by 25 percent for other applications. V 41%inimum panel edge distance is 3/4 inch TABLE NO V—ALLOWABLE WITHDRAWAL VALUES IN POUNDS PER FASTENER DUE TO WIND OR SEISMIC LOADS, CATALOG NUMBER SHANK TYPE SHANK DIAMETER MINIMUM STEEL . THICKNESS MINIMUM THICKNESS OF LUMBERS AND/OR STRUCTURAL ANELS2.' /e 'lie' lj' /" V 133 V V 11( - . lhlj' • 132" .214 I e' *2x4 AKN Knurled 0.144 14 gauge 55 85 90 95 100 120 - ASM Smooth 0.l44 II gauge V 55 85 90 95 100 . . 120 V ASD StepDown 0.l90 14 gauge - V - - - 140 V 140 140 .. 140 ASD Step Down 0.l90' II gauge . -.. - V - " .- 195 :195 195 '195 'ASD Step Down 0.190 I16" .- '230 . . 250 285. 310 1These values are for loads due to wind or earthquake and must be reduced by 25 percent for other applicatiohs. -Values are for Structural I panels for rated sheathing panels reduce loads 10 percent. 3Fastener loads are governed by the lumber and/or panel thickness. . . 4Fastener loads are governed by the metal framing thickness. 5Fastener loads are governed by the lumber and/or panel thickness. V V Specific gravity of lumber must be greater than 0.51. V VV V V V V 7Minimum panel edge distance is I8 inch. V V V V TABLE NO. VI—ALLOWABLE WITHDRAWAL VALUES FOR STRUCTURAL I PANELS ATTACHED TO STEEL FRAMING IN POUNDS PER FASTENER DUE TO WIND OR SEISMIC LOADS" . V FASTENER V FRAMING THICKNESS MINIMUM THICKNESS OF STRUCTURAL PANEL (Inches) Catalogue Number Shank Type Shank Diameter (Inches) . MINIMUM STEEL .'3/8 . , V V 15132 -: 16 g 70 '' 90 95 AKN Knurled V - 0.100 I8ga '. V . 20 g V 65 35 65 35 V 65 35 22 g . 20 V 20 20 'Values are for loads imposed by wind or earthquake and must be reduced by 25 percent for normal loading. 2For rated sheathing panels, loads must be reduced by 10 percent. 3The minimum panel edge distance is 3/g inch. V V TABLE NO. V111-_ALLWABLEVLATERALVVALUES IN POUNDS PER FASTENER FOR STRUCTURAL I PANELS ATTACHED TO STEEL FRAMING12'3 . FASTENER V MINIMUM STEEL FRAMING THICKNESS INMU.' ThICKr.ESS Oi STRUCTUR. PANELS (inch) Catalogue Number V Type Shank Diameter (Inches) 'a ,ie 15l32 V li 19132 16 g 110 130 . 135 145 165 AKN Knurled 11 g 110 130 135 '135 135 0.100 . , 20 V 100 100 100 100 100 V 22 gà " 85 85 85 . 85 85 tValues must be reduced 10 percent for rated sheathing. 2Values are for loads imposed by wind or earthquake and mbst be reduced by 25 percent for normal loading. 3Theminimum panel edge distance is 3/9 inch. Page4of6 PANEL 16 195 9U 390 . 495 - STRUCTURAL I 24 230 . ; 205 .340 - 310 415 530 16 4.55 580 I6or24 240 365 485 615 16or24 260 390 515 660 24 145 215 285 ' 365 • 16 175 265 350 ' 445 RATED SHEATHING '116 24 185 280 375 475 AND SIDING 16 05 310 410 "525 16 or 24 220 325 ' 435 555 16or24 235 350 465 .. 595 16or24 265 400 ' 535 . 680 Report No 4144 TABLE NO. VIII—ALLOWABLE SHEAR VALUES IN POUDS PER FOOT FOR PLYWOOD SHEAR WALLS WITH- MINIMUM NO. 16 GAUGE STEEL FRAMING AND ERICO 0.100-INCH-DIAMETER FASTENERS1.Z3.4 , ' -• MINIMUM PANEL FRAMING SPACING • • ' . FASTENER SPACING (Inches on center) . - • THICKNESS (inch) - (inches on center) 3 • • 2 - -. 3j 24 160 - , -240- • ' 320 -. ', 405 . ' Values are for loads imposed by wind or earthquake and must be reduced 25 percent for normal loading. 2The pin must be long enough to penetrate through the metal framing a minimum of 1/4 inch. ' -The minimum panel.edge distance is inch. 4Spacing' of fasteners along intermediate framing members is .12 inches on center except as noted. 5Spacing of fasteners along intermediate framing iembers is 6 inches on center. TABLE NO IX—ALLOWABLE SHEAR VALUES IN POUNDS PER FOOT FOR PLYWOOD SHEAR WALLS WITH MINIMUM NO 18 GAUGE STEEL FRAMING AND ERICO 0100-INCH DIAMETER FASTENERS1.234 MINIMUM PANEL FRAMING SPACING ' FASTENER SPACING (Inches on center) S 4 . 3 . 2 PANEL THICKNESS (j) - (Inches on center) 35 ' 24 , 160 . 1 . 240 ' - 320 405 16 195 290 390 495 STRUCTURAL[ ;'16 s 24 205 310 415 530 O 16 •' 230 340 455 • ' 580 , 15/3, 16 or 24 235 ' 355 475 ., '605 3J5 24 145 ' 215 285 ' 365 RATED SHEATHING 7 5AND , 16 24 . 175 -, 265- ' ' 185 280 350 375 . . 445 475 ' SIDING (I6 /16 16 . 205 '---310 '410 ' -- -' 525'- _________________________ 16or24 215 320 425 545 tValues are for loads imposed by wind or earthquake and must be reduced 25 percent for normal loading. 2Thepin must be long enough to penetrate through the metal framing a minimum of 1/4 inch. ' 3The minimum panel edge distance is 3, inch. , 'Spacing of fasteners along intermediate framing members is 12 inches on center except as noted. 5Spacing of fasteners along intermediate framing members is 6 inches on center. TABLE NO. X—ALLOWABLE SHEAR VALUES IN POUNDS PER FOOT FOR PLYWOOD SHEAR WALLS WITH MINIMUM NO. 20 GAUGE STEEL FRAMING AND ERICO 0.100-INCH-DIAMETER FASTENERS1.2.3.4 ' - FASTENER SPACING (Inches on center) MINIMUM PANEL FRAMING SPACING 4 3 2 PANEL THICKNESS (inch) (Inches on center 6 - ' 35 , 24 - 145 220 . 290 370 STRUCTURAL I ' .- 16 190 265 355 455 16 () . 45 . 3 415 16 180 . 265 355 455, 3j 24 130 195 265 335 RATED SHEATHING /8 • 16 160 ' '- 240 320 ' 410 AND SIDING /16 24 145 •- 220 290 370 16 160 240 320 • 410 Values are for loads imposed by wind or earthquake and must be reduced 25 percent for normal loading. 2The pin must be long enough to penetrate through the metal framing a minimum of 1/4 inch. 3The minimum panel edge distance is inch. 4Spacing of fasteners along intermediate framing members is 12 inches on center except as noted. 5Spacing of fasteners along intermediate framing members is 6 inches on center. Page 5of 6 S. Report No.4144 TABLE NO. XI---ALLOWABLE SHEAR VALUES IN POUNDS PER FOOT FOR PLYWOOD SHEAR WALLS WITH MINIMUM NO. 22 GAUGE STEEL FRAMING AND ERICO 0.100-INCH-DIAMETER FASTENERS"23.4 MINIMUM PANEL FRAMING SPACING FASTENER SPACING (Inches on center) _______________ 6 4 3 2 PANEL THICKNESS (Inch) (inches on center) 24 125 185 245 315 STRUCTURAL I 7/8 116 16 24 135 205 . 270- 380 345 /I6 16 150 225 300 380 3j5 24 110 165 220 280 RATED SHEATHING I8 16 135 200 270 345 AND SIDING 24 120 185 245 310 1/16 16 135 200 270.' 345 tValues are for loads imposed by wind or earthquake and must be reduced 25 percent for normal loading. 2The pin must be long enough to penetrate through the metal framing a minimum of 1/4 inch. 3The minimum panel edge distance is 3, inch. . . 4S pacing of fasteners along intermediate framing members is 12 inches on center except as noted. * 5Spacing of fasteners along intermediate framing members is 6 inches on center. - TABLE NO. XII—ALLOWABLE SHEAR VALUES IN POUNDS PER FOOT FOR HORIZONTAL PLYWOOD DiAPHRAGMS WITH NO; 16 GAUGE OR NO. 18 GAUGE STEEL FRAMING AND ERICO 0.100INCHD1AMETER FASTENERS1.2'3 BLOCKED DIAPHRAGMS FASTENER SPACING4.5 UIjBLOCKED DIAPHRAGMS 5 PANEL MINIMUM PANEL THICKNESS (Inch) FRAMING WIDTH (Inches) 6 4 2'! 2 Case I - Case 26 6 6 4 3 3 /8 Ill, 2'h 220 245 290 330 440 490 585 655 195 220 145 165 /16 . . L'I2 2'I2 255 290 340 385 515 575 685 770 . 230 255 170 190 STRUCTURAL! /3 11/2 . .21/2 - 265 300 355 400 535 600 710 800 235 265 180 200 15/326 l'/2 -2'! 270 305 365 410 545 610 - 725 815 240 270 180 205 19 /3 6 11 /' 21/2 335 375 445 500 670 750 890 1000 295 335 225 250 3 /8 11 /2 21/2 195 220 265 295 395 . 445 525 590 175 . 195 . 130 .150 /16 11/2 .2112 230 260 .310 345 4.60 520 -615 690 205 230 155 175 A RATED SHEATHING IS /32 I'/2 2'/2 240 270 . 320 360 480 540 640 720 215 240 . 160 180 11/326 I'!' 21! 245 275 325 365 490 550 655 735 220 245 165 185 19 6 /32 ,. 1 1I2 .2'/-- 300 340 : 400 - 450 600 675 .. 800 .900 265 .300 - 200 225 tValues are for loads imposed by wind or earthquake and must.be reduced 25 percent for normal loading. 2The pin must be long enough to pnetrate through the meta] fiaming a minimum of 1/4 inch. 3The minimum panel edge distance is inch. 4For fastener spacing and case description see U.B.C. Table No. 25.1-2. 5Spacing of fasteners along intermediate framing members is 12 inches on center. 6To obtain the allowable shear values for these thicknesses requires a minimum No. 16 gauge framing member. Page 6of6 Report No. 4144 TABLE NO. X111—ALLOWABLE SHEAR VALUES IN POUNDS PER FOOT FOR HORIZONTAL PLYWOOD DIAPH R A G M S W I T H - MINIMUM NO. 20 GAUGE STEEL FRAMING AND ERICO 0.100-INCH-DIAMETER PINS FASTENERS123'6 :. - - - BLOCKED DIAPHRAGMS FASTENER SPACING4.5 ., UNBLOCKED DIAPHRAGMS45 MINIMUM PANEL FRAMING WIDTH l 2113 - 2 ... S. -6 4 3 PANEL THICKNESS (inch) (inches) C.se I - Case 24 STRUCTIRAL I 21/ '3/8 11/2 170. 225 .335 450 -- 50 110 190 250 . 380 505 . 170 125 3 • lI2 150 2fl0 305 405 ' 135 100 RATED SHEATHING 2'/, 170 225 340 455 150 115 7 /16 . I/ 170 - 22,5 335 450 ISO - 110 2'I2 190 250 380 505 170 125 Values are for loads imposed by wind or earthquake and must be reduced 25 percent 1onorma! loading.. The pin must be long enough to penetrate through the metal framing a minimum of 1/4 inch. - 3The minimum panel edge distance is 31 inch. 4For fastener spacing and case descriptions see U.S.C. Table No. 2544. . . . • . 5Spacing of fasteners along intermediate framing members is 12 inches on center. . 6Shear capacities in this table are limited by steel thickness Use of thicker panels does not increase the allowable shear values TABLE NO X1V—K VALUES FOR q, DE1ERM1NAT10N12 GAUGE OF STUD - STUD THICKNESS (Inch) MAXIMUM LOAD (pounds per fastener)3A IC I4 - , 0.0710 . 215 730 16 , 0.0553 . 165 525 - 18 - 0.0428 135 .• ... 430 20 - 0.0333 100 310 22 0.0275 85 203 'K values for use in formula: - : :- = (Load per fastener )3 For application of e see Sections 25.922 and 25923 of U.B.C.Standard No 25-9. 2A11 values are based on 0.100-inch-diameter fastener except as noted fir No. 14 gauge stud. . - 3Maximum loads per fastener must not be exceeded. Lower loads may be used with the K values noted above. - •. . - p-Fastener loads already include short term wind and seismic increases. Values-for fastener aredetermined from tables in this report by d i v i d i n g t h e k a d s p e r f o o t by fastener spacing. . . 14 gauge stud is valid only if Erico0.144-inch-diameter fasteners are used. No Kvaluefor this gauge is available for the 0.100-inch-diameter fasieners. 5K value for No1 .i 4 I-- 4 I' 8 °:.:' I I L1 ,2-/,e11c 0------- • / - ( .1 • e '' IYA A1 hY4 - 1 IWO 4 A - > s' 1A. LJ FUd. () ftJeJ1J (f4-1 ce-) 4x NI H ALJ\ '?tt- FDASS DESIGN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC: PAGE.MtJ -- -f-C - - --CKDBYJ DATE-- IIJ1ILTe.7 jI I 1I LIIT TitI I ITlI - i4i L eo IT TT: I ITt L I1IIITI. 1IT± ILl ± i---.- -----------------•-•-•-• 14- 1 1 - 11 :1III:1 III - 1 fT- -L-.--L44-- J psiil_1 I lIT 4j L Li 70 - _-- --Z)-J T 0 TILl :tI4 -- jil~ --. ----'------ —H- ----r - -- - - . ----i : ±r 3V± ir -ti •1 ______ .1 -- It1sh /2..4o - 1 .itASE DESIGN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC. - - --IRVINE -------4--, m _- --------+ --PROJECT PAGE DATE_loLl ,J, -- - — '- - I - -—iTh-- '1 it:jitt til ILl I lTI 1 IILlILII1IIT II1T1I±1ILl 71L -- - -- H-' -- - - A," 4 H-H± I I I •-i ! -------!--- —i.4 x tAr F — -'-a- +- --- -- — -;-- L.:. ! - - - - - - - -. -. . - tL... .4-- - , . •. .1- A' 4- n()/ -. •1-, LJ's L/h 24 r--J4 TT" TDASSE DESIGNSOURN;CALWORNIA,INC.Th - mVJNEj-_-_ 1PAGE.I li - —j —H—+-— - -- - TF-1- - - -'-- ---- - - -- j . IiL1± t:iir - ii L Lav V A* 7" 1 Ij -- •-L ____ ____ ____ ____ • • - _____ _____ . _____ _____ ___ ••-..• - •: - I - - DASSE DESIGN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC ---'-• -.-•--- --PROJECT$Oj PAGE__L - LDATE /1/1f 1-4 L$SU II1I11I III1I TF -±-H----H ------- _J*i.____•____ --- :t4JiI::1: 1 I iL IlL - i 1 4 1 I 'I 11 It .............................. -F--L--- --H ' I I I I - - - :1:: DASSE DESIGN SOUTHERN CALWORNIA,C. - . .... IRVINE -..PRC)J PAGE 3-3 1 . .................................................................BV DATEF . - - - CKDBY DATE-_I- -- 7 id - --- -----"-4- ______________ : __i__• . . _I I ET/4 4T 14 tLtt t t -- krL . . . - ______• . . . .. . . . .: I I - A LAN - . DASSE DESIGN SOUTHERN cALffoRNIA,:c. -- -- ---_ -j Lt, 77 J -* ._i __J PROJECT1I3kI 1PAGE_L4J_! -ç --- - r-------BY-!7q - - -- -i-- - - -CKDBY- DATE .42 - ttrhFrH ----k ------ -------------------- --r---------"-.--,--- -..-. -- - -••-- ---- •i-----•••i--4--•-;--i- - rit.be. 60 Hi 1 H" ....... I , I •1 . II ......__,------..'-.-..------------.-1----.-.-------..---------------------- I I I I I -------t ---. ----t-.------- - - -- -- -- - _l_ ---- -I .-. - .L.L.. I -- 1 --t---- ---- - ---h H__IHI -- ---- - --H- 4— H 1 T T ITI - :Yttt TtJIt t -L -- --- 4 . - I 1 --1 -••-- '-- _LjJ V.L,-1,) I f ALLI LA1 ( ASSE DESIGN SOUThERN CALIFORNIALNC.' I - PROJECT '7SI Of PAGE BY:1 L DATEJ2/L.J j. Lt.Z.i3 Jz2 pd 4,YeIt .L3 — - / I ;tit 111 ± lIE ri H I )71- LiL 4L4LJ --F4H- ti—+-----i---- i 4 "T —i----------f----+-------- :1 .1.1 - —3-. -'- -1— - * -- - L(9,(oIc._j_L - - -1.-- - -r-- - 4.._1.;._4?AMiIV4 X j 1±iH ----H-- -i—i— —H-- ---- -:-- -i —i—H- r-i--- J _LL LiJc, i -i-H I i 4 I I I '. NbC Se U 0 . I 2 FL (I -- !I 1 l 17 Oil ---:- :•..% . .4 _L. -iHz H -- (Cc)((ôô oc) - 2-1 .••.- . : JAN 15 196 10:29AM TURPIN&RATTANENG ,P.1/8 TU R P I N & R A T T A N ENtRING, INC. CDNULTIN LCTRIAL ENINJS ld 8999 Rio S AN DiD DRIVE - •iIv4 SLIrTT2DD SAN DIED, CA 921 O9 649 G19/299/777 JAN 1j FAX/299/1229 Fl, ACSIM I LE TRANSMITTAL ATTENTI ON:fr/L. PRDcT EPO SENT BY: TOTAL pAS (INLUiN, covroq PAc5) REMARKS'. AN . - 7go-ooe Li r OP Z /7 c r 7%.4E 5 g0 iji Z - 3 /2( _w /i f /(yL,ckrs g00 / (I Does - Mc VV S V c i'- 44P;9 ,4,.'p A/6 J1qvg Ce',i'ps ' Lf? - 7 - - - y-=-- - - P"a'.vnfN6 c/ 1IV F it-i Aoqol p sr)% ,a-.'c '' 1 =A)(OER j " rr mew 1t/b'tr 1N S ,*A A/c ai - - .-. . JAN 15 '96 1 29AM TURPIN & RATTAN ENGROJECT 1_ JOB No. _ 2/F_ ENGINEERING, INC. SUBJECT IPAyL.1 T By /k bATE V CONSULTING ELECTRICAL ENGINEERS ii /2( CHK DATE - * SHEET NO. OF 0 - Th - •- .• - .-- • •• •- - -.•-- JAN 15 196 10 3OAM TURPIN & RATTAN tJECT No'.PRO 3/8 URPIN ATTAN ENGINEERING, INC SUBJECT PAY,r 1' BY - DATE CONSULTING ELECTRICAL ENGINEERS 1IT CMK DATE -- -- - SHEET NO _____ OF - JAN 15 '96 10 30AM TURFIN & RATTAN ENGECT " JOB NO PROJ 2c! IN ENGINEERING, INC. ,SUBJECT9 ____ DATE CONS(JLTItvG ELECTRICAL ENGINEERS i I2-. CHK _____ DATE - - SHEET NO. ____ OF ____ JAN 15 '96 1 31AM TURPIN & RATTAN N 7? ECT JOB NO. - 5'8 TURPIN ENGINEERING, INC SUBJECT f?4I t/1 DATE CONSULTING ELECTRICAL ENGINEERS: V CH K DATE - SHEET NO (f OF _9 JAN 15 '96 1:31AM'TURPIN & RATTAN ENG. P. 6/8 (b) For areas daylit by horizontal glazing, the daylit area is the footprint of the skylight plus, in each of the lateral and longitudinal dimensions of the skylight, the lesser of the floor-co-ceiling height, the distance to the nearest 60-inch or higher opaque partition, or one-half the horizontal distance to the edge of the closes: skylight or vertical glazing. (C) The daylit area calculated using a method approved by the Commission. Such methods include DOE 2.10 and E, Superl ice. Quickl ire and other computer-based models that determine the daylit area based on modeling the features of the space. Effective Aperture (EA) is (I)for windows, the visible light transmittance (VLT) times the window wall ratio; and (2)for skylights, the welifactor times the VLT times the skylight-to-roof area ratio• of skylights nines 0.85. (0.85 is a dirt depreciation factor for the skylight.) The table below can be used as a simplified method for calculating-the EA. It indicates when the EA is low enough to invoke the exception to the requirements for daylight switching control. Each vertical column of the table corresponds to a window wall ratio or skylight-to-roof ratio range. Each horizontal row of the matrix corresponds to a range of VLTs. In questionable cases,' indicated by a MAYBE in Table 5-1, the Effective Aperture should be calculated to obtain a precise answer. -1 Effective Aperature Matrix lsAaqtiat'bay1lghtlng Available? WINDOWS (Vertical Glazing) Window Walt Ratio Glazing Type <0.10 0.10 to 0.20 0.20 to 0.40 >0.40 VLT. 0.60 NO MAYBE YES YES VLT 3S%too.59 NO MAYBE MAYBE YES VLT <0.35 NO NO MAYBE • MAYBE SKYLIGHTS (Horizontal Glazing) Skylight-to-Root Ratio Glazing Type <0,01 0.01 to 0.03 >0.03 VLT> 0.60 NO MAYBE YES. VLT 0.35 to 0.59 NO MAYBE YES VLT <0.35 - NO MAYBE MAYBE NOTE: This skylight Mat,ix does not account for well factor; if Me skylight has a light well, the EA could be sstandalty lowered. It is recommended that the £4 be calculated in such cases. EA is calculated for each room with daylighting. Thus, the window wall ratio used in calculating EA is determined from the gross exterior wall area of that wall of the room having the window(s) and from the window area of that window. Likewise, the skylight-to-roof area ratio is determined from the skylight area and the gross exterior roof area of each daylit space. (See Section 3.1.2.A for dettniUons of these surfaces.) See below for definitions of VLT and well factor. Fi2ure 5-5: Window Davlit Area or 1/2 of distance to next glazing (windows or skylight) 2'-0 or Boundary of - nearest ,. Partition These luminaires are In the daytit area. 1' These luminaires are not In the dayilt area. .1 I1TG1I Nonresidential Manual JAN 15 '96 1:32AM TURFIN & RATTAN ENG. F. 7/B Source: Fig 7.38, (ES Ughr'g Handbook. 14 Rrncw. ure 5-7: IV Factor (Efficiency of Well) Graph (b) for irregular shaped wells: Well height x well perimeter Well index = 4x well area Where the length, width, perimeter, and area are measured at the bottom of the well. The well index and R. the area weighted average reflectance of the walls of the well, are used in Figure 5-7 to determine the well factor. Example 5-6: Effective Aperture Calculation Question A skylight well has bottom dimensions of 6 At by 8 ft. The well height is 4 ft. The inside surface of, the well is painted with a blue paint having a reflectance of 50%. The skylight area is 16 sf. It has a visible light transmittance 0(35%. The grass exterior roof area of the ,om is 200 sf. What is the effective aperture? LTGIJ 5-12 First, calculate the well index: Well index = Wellhgt x (well length .. well width) 2 x well length x well width 058w 4ftx(8ft..-6ft) 2x8ftx5f1 Next, find the well factor (efficiency of well) from Figure 5-7. Enter at the bottom at 0.58. Draw vertical line up to the 50% reflectance line (interpolate midway between the 40% ànd6Q% lines). From the intersection, draw a horizontal line left to find the well factor of 0.56. Then calculate the skylight-to-roof ratio of the room: 116sf/200sf— 0.06 Finally, calculate the EA by multiplying together the well factor, VI_ T, skylight-to-roof ratio, and 0.85: £4 = 0.56 x 0.35x 0.08 x 0.85 0.01. Display Lighting (131(e)) Display lighting shall be separately switched on circuits that are 20 amps or less. The general lighLin would be onseparaceswitching so thatit could be operated without having to turn On the display lighting (as, for example, when the cleaning crew is working at night and there is no need for the displays to be lit). Shut-Off Controls (131(d)) An effective way to control lighting energy is to automatically turn off an the lights in a building during non-business hours. The Standards require all buildings or separately metered space greater than 5,000 square feet of conditioned space to have a certified automatic shut-off control (See Section 5.1.2.D for more information on certified devices). Additionally, if the building has more than one floor, each floor shall have all of the lights on the floor controlled by a separate automatic control device (or control point if a multiple point control system). Nonresidential Manual JAN 15 '96 10:32AM TURPIN & RATTAN ENG. falls under the mandatory requirements for separate switching in daylit areas, and is also given credit under the optional automatic controls credits. Under the mandatory measures, the electric lighting in enclosed areas greater than 250 square feet which are "daylit areas" (close to window, skylights, atria, etc.) must be switched so that these areas can be controlled separately from the non-daylit areas. (See below for the precise definition of "daylit area". It is acceptable to achieve control of the daylit area by shutting off at least 50% of the lamps within the daylit area. This must be done by a control dedicated to serving only luminaires in the daylit area. If there are separate daylit areas for windows and skylights, they must be controlled separately. The daylit area switching requirements are in addition to the bi-level switching requirements. Taken together, there are at least three ways to comply, as illustrated in Figure 5-4. With the "4 Switch Option," the bi-level switching is provided separately to the daylit area (within fifteen feet of the windows) and to the non-daylit area. The "3 Switch Option" also meets the requirements because switch controls at least 50% of the lighting in the daylit area. Switch () controls the remainder of the lights in the daylit area and half of the lights in the non-daylit area, Switch 0-controls the remainder of ights in *the non-daylit area. The "Dimmer Switch Option" controls the daylit and non-daylit areas separately, and the dimmer takes care of the hi-level illumination requirement The separate control of daylit areas is not required when there is not enough daylight to be used effectively. This Js_decided in one of two ways: When the daylight to a window or skylight'i' so obstructed by adjacent structures, trees, or other natural objects that the effective use of lighting is not feasible. When the ef ec ye aperture of the window is less than 0.1 (or of the skylight is less than 0.01). A low effective aperture prevents usable daylight from entering the area; it.is caused by, small glazing area, low transmission glazing materials, or a combination of both. (See definition of effective aperture below.) 5. Lighting Systems P. 8/8 nc I ... 15 ft 4 Switch Option 4d 1 15 ft 3 Switch Option I I15 ft Dimmer Switch Option Figure 54: Combined Bi-level and Daylit Area Switching iylit Area is the space on the floor that is the 'ger of (a) plus (b), or (C); (a) For areas daylit by vertical glazing, the daylit area has a length of 15 feet, or the distance on the floor, perpendicular to the glazing, to the nearest 60-inch or higher opaque partition, whichever is less; and a width of the window plus either 2feeton each side, the distance to an opaque partition, or one ha If the distance to the closest skylight or vertical glazing, whichever is least. 5-9 DESIGN OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC. '1 STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS I, 8001 Irvine Center Drive, Suite 825 • Irvine, - CA 92718 •714/450-0444 • Fax 714/450-0448 STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS For: SCHUMACHER BUILDING 1979 VOLUNTARY SEISMIC RETROFIT ( Preparcd for: McGraw/Baldwi:Architects OFESS, W 568 of Southern California, Inc. OF January 17, 1996 Xp 331 ARTIALFp LAN V V PASSE DESIGN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC. IRVINE V L-b. 17 I PROJECT PAGE o V BY DATE DATE - DATVE TV C Vo L V V V 1Lt SVA:eA V V Vl O' . I V VV• x Yz •V or LV / .. I1L ±1 Al kI-— 3TAI J PL i9 / I OV.; D H V i. F--,' 1V ru61 - -r pe- ' +- V V V 1 J iA •- AJ V . V •V V • V V. . V V V V AL rIVT o V V Jhc i4 V cr1 -( t2r- L.A, , V V Li I I I V V • V A c V v J L j c3L • V V V C4-LA&p 4. 0VJ1VIIJLAVIT( fl V V T Ro- VJ V L ' C-S T' -' D IA V \''-TAL bR-Ac- A-r COLV LtJ. 25: - ' L 1/1 7/k TABLE 23-I-J-i—ALLOWABLE SHEAR IN POUNDS PER FOOT FOR HORIZONTAL WOOD STRUCTURAL PANEL DIAPHRAGMS WITH FRAMING OF DOUGLAS FIR-LARCH OR SOUTHERN PINE1 - BLOCKED DIAPHRAGMS UNBLOCKED DIAPHRAGMS - Nail spacing (in.) at diaphragm boundaries (all - cases), at continuous panel edges parallel to load (Cases 3 and 4) and at all panel edges (Cases 5 and 6) Nails spaced 6 (152 mm) max. at supported edges x 25.4 for mm . - MINIMUM 6 4 I 21/22 22 MINIMUM NAIL MINIMUM NOMINAL NOMINAL WIDTH OF Case 1 (No 'All other Nails acm (in.)at other panel edges ' pa g x 25.4 for mm PANEL GRADE COMMON NAIL SIZE PENETRATION IN FRAMING (inches) ' PANEL THICKNESS (inches) FRAMING MEMBER '(inches) unblocked edges or. continuous loints. parallel to load) configurations (Cases 2 3. 4, 5 and 6) 6 6 4. 3 x 25.4 for mm x 0.0146 for N/mm 6d . 11/4 .116 2 3 - 185 210 250 280 375 420 •, 420 475 165 185 125 140 Structural I 8d . - 11/2 /8 2 3 270 300 360 400 530 600 600 675 '240-.'' . ' 265 . 180 200 100 , 1/ . /32 2 3 320 360 425 480 640 720 730 820 285 320 . 215 -. 240 6d 11/4 /I6 2 3 170 190 225 . 250 335 380 . 380 430 150 - 170' - 110 ' 125 2 3 185 210 250 . 280 375 420 420 475 ' 165" . 185 . 125 140 C-D,C-C, /8 2 3 -240 270 , 320 , 360 480 540 545 610 , 215. 240 , 160 180 Sheathing. grades ' covered in U.S.C. and other 8d , /16 2 , 3 255 285 , 340 ' 380 " 505 , 570 575 645 . 230 , 255'' : ' 170 190 15/3' ' /32 2 3 270 300 360 400 530 600 ' 600 ' 675 . . 240 . .,' : ' 265 ' '• 180 ' 200 Standard 23-3 or 23-9 10d3 1 /8 15 '32 2 3 290 325 385 -430 575 ' 650, , 655 ' -735 . . ' 255 ' :' 290 .-;.• 190 215 19 /32 2 3 320 360 '425 480 640 720 730 . 820- ' ' 285 -. -,. 32Q •'.' '. 215 240 tThese values are for short-time loads due to wind or earthquake and must be reduced 25 percent for normal loading. Space nails 12 inche (3l5 mm)on center along intermediate framing members. Allowable shear values for nails in framing members of other species set forth in Table 23-111-FF of Division Ill shall be calculated for all thher grafts by multiplying the' shear capacities for nails in Structural I by the following factors: 0.82 for species with specific gravity greater than or equal 100.42 but less than 0.49, and 0.65 for species a specific gravity less than 0.42. - . 21'raming at adjoining panel edges shall be 3-inch (76 mm) nominal or'wtder and nails shall be staggered where nails e spiced 2 inches (51 mm) or 21/2 inches (64mm) on center. - 3Framing at adjoining panel edges shall be 3-inch (76 mm) nominal or wider and nails shall be staggered where lOd nails having penetration into framing of more than 1 /8 inches (41 mm) are spaced 3 inches (76 mm) or less on center. Li $4 SE1In94 $14 BLOCKING IF Joad $$ASE4' DIAPHRAGM BOUNDARY . I Continuous panel: ints Load CASE 5 Framing Load CASE 6 Framing Continuous panel pints --- Blocking Continuous panel joints Blocking NOTE: Framing may be oriented in either direction for diaphragms, provided sheathing is properly designed for vertical loading. PS) 9 ~~A2D (R) Version .O3 7 DASSE Design, Inc. Job 1IO(3 I L JA4-: .. 2J Page _ - Date______ FRAME 2.5, SCHUMACHEP BLDG. 1979 1/i7/& FILENAME:SFRAM25.R2D, M. POWER --------------- ------------- Units Option. : US Standard AISC Code Checks 9th Edition ASD Shear Deformation: No P-Delta Effects :No Redesign : Yes Edge Forces : No A.S.I.F. : 1.333 - --------- Node.-Boundary Conditions X-Coord Y-Coord X-dof Y-dof Rotation Temp. --------------- (ft) - --- - - - - - (ft)-- 7--m jin,K/in) ---- (±n,K/in)--- (r,K-ft/r) ----- (F) - 0.00 - 0.00 R 0.00 2 0.00 11.13 0.00 .3 0.00 20.00 0.00 4 23.08 0.O0 R .R 0.00 5 23.08 11.13 0.00 6 23.08 20.00 0.00 7 11.54 11.13 - 0.00 8 11.54 20.00 .. 0.00 ----------------------------------------- Material Elastic Poisson's The Weight Yield Stress Label Modulus Ratio Coefficient Density (Fy) -------------------(Ksi) ------------------------(F) --------.(K/ft3) ---- --(Ksi) STL. 29000.00 0.30000 - 0.65000 0.490 36.000 Section Database Matl. Area Moment of As y/y Label Shape Set Inertia Coef --------- ---- ------------ ----------- -------- (jA2) ---------(jnA4) COL W10X22, STL. - 6.49 11.400 1.20 1 BEAM W14X34 STL. 10.00 340.000 1.20 BRACE1 TU6X6X4 STL. - 5.59 30.300 1.20 BRACE2 TU6X6X4 STL. 5.59 30.300 1.20 STRUT - Wl0X22 - STL. 6.49 118.000: 1.20 I J I Releases J End Offsets S No Node Node Section x y z x y - z Sec Sway I J - Length ------------------ --------- -------- - ----- ----------------- -------- -- -(in) ---- (in) -------(ft) 1 1- 2 C0L Y - 11.13 2 2 -. 3 -COL 8.87 RISA-2D (R) Version 3.03 DASSE Design, Inc. , Job __oI x Page _',-( Date_________ 'SFRzlvIE 2.5, SCHUMACHER BLDG. 19;9 .. .' FILENAME:SFPAM25.R2D, M. POWER I j ' I'. Releases j . . End .Offsets No Node Node Section x z x y z- Sec Sway' ,I- J Length ------(in) ----(in) ------,.(ft) . 3 4- ------------ .------------' 5 COL ' • . . ' 11.13 4 5- 6 COL . . 8.87 . • 5 2 7 BEAM 1 . '. ' 11.54 6 7 - " 5 BEAM ' 1 '. ' 11.54 7 .3 -: 8' STRUT , 1 , ' ' . 11.54 8 . 8-- 6 STRUT '• ' 1 11.54 9 1 7 BRACE1 1 1 ' . 16.03 10 7 -. 4 BRACE1 1 ' 1 . . ' 16.03 11 2 - 8 BRACE2 14.56 12 8' - 5 BRACE2 • 1 1 , ' 14.56 I J . Unbraced Lengths • K Factors Bending Coefs • No Node Node " Lb-in Lb-out ' .Lc, In Out Cm . Cb -----------------------. - (ft) -----(ft) ------ (ft) -- --------------- -- --------------- - 1 1.- 2 • • ' ' ' ' ..•• '• ' • '' ' , . .2 - 3 ' , ' ' '• •. • S 2 3 4- 5 • 4 .5- 6 5 2 7 • 0.00 ' 'S 6. 7- 5 •' "' 0.00 • 7 3• .8 .' , • , '• .00 • ' . • 8 8'-' .6 • ' 2.00 ' . • .'' 9 1,- ' 7 . ' ..: ' ' ' ' . • ' 10. 7- 4.' . • • 11 2-8,, ' • ' . ' 12 '8-' 5 Section Set Depth Range'. Width Range ' Unity Check Range Max . Min Max , Mm. Max Mm • ------------- ('1) -------(in) -- ------'-(in)-'-- (in) -------------------- ------ • COL , ' 10.00 .8.00 • " . .0.9000 , 0.5000 BEAM • 12.00 10.00 ' . ' 0.9000 0.5000 BLC , Basic Load Case • ' --------------------------------- , . Load Totals' Description ' . ' ' • Nodal Point ,..,Dist. • 2 DEAD LOAD (50 PSF) '. . 2 " 2 - 3 LIVE LOAD (125 PSF) • ' • 2 .2 4 SEISMIC ' . " ' ' RIA-2D (°R) Version.3.03 DASSE Design,' . . . Job >( Page ___-I(o. '0 0 Date FRAME 2.5, SCHUMACHEk BLDe3 1979 " : ,'' ' I7ii/q, FILENAIVIE:SFRAM25.R2D, N. POWER 0 Nodal Loads, BLC 2: DEAD LOAD (50 PSF) Node, 0 Number Global X Global Y Moment . ---(K) -------------------(K)--'-------------------'- (f) ---.- :0 2. 0 .0 '000' : •' -3.87Q.: , 0 0.000 5' ' 0.000 , . 0 -1.570 0 0 00 .0.000 H Member'-Point Loads,BLC. 2: DEAD LOAD ('5.0 PSF) Memb I °J, .. 0: , . : ' 0 , ' , • No Node Node' " Direction 0 Magnitude 0 Location 0 -------------------------------• ---(K,Kft,F) -------------------(ft) -------- '0 5 2-. 07 0 .' 3.270 ,0 0 0 08420 0 0, , 6 ' - Y '.' ' . -3.070 , ' 0 4.210 - O Nodal Loads, BLC3: LIVE LOAD (125 PSF) Node ---r Numbe Global 'X' Global Y . Moment (K) ---.-• -'- (K)------------ -------- --(Kft) ' .------------.. '• 2 . 0.000. , 0 -9-.670,0.000 • 0 5 ,• 0 ', 0.000 . '°' , ' ' '3.:760 ' 0.000 •, Member Point Loads,BLC3: LIVE LOAD (125 PSF)' ',, 0 0 ' Memb I. , J 0 ' No Node Node " Direction , 0 Magnitude., 0 'Location , 0 --------------------- - -----(K,'K-ft,F) ---------------------(ft) 0 0 ------ 5 2. 7. '. Y ,0 0 0 , 0 -8.160 ' 8.420 .0 0 6 :.: 7.- "5 -7.670 4.210 0 , 'Nodal Lbds, BLC 4:0 SEISMIC. 0 , ' • • ,, - 0 , , 0 O '0 Node 0 0 0 •' Number • 0 Global X , . Global Y ' •0 Moment ' O - (K) -------------'---.- (K) ------------------('K-ft) '0 , •. '- .2 '. 0 ' 4.470. 0.000 0.000 O ' : 5.0. 000 ' • 0.000 -. 0 32.000 . 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 6 o 0 ' 0 , ', 32000' ' 0 , S - 00.000 . 0 ' 0.000 ' .Load Combinatin . Self Wt BLC • BLC BLC BLC BLC ,0 W . E No..,' "Description , Dir Fac ' Fac Fac ..Fac Fac Fac -, DYNA S V. • ------------ - - ;TY ------------------------------------------- 0 , 3DL+LL. . ':- , ''21 31 ', ' 0, O , , 4 SEISMIC ONLY, ' 4 1 0,00 -. 0 ' • 0 ' RISA-2D. (R) Version 3.03 DASSE Design, Inc. Job °Kioi, XI J.JL____________ S . FRAME 2.5, SCHUMACHER BLDG. 1979 FILENAME:SFRAM25.R2D, M. POWER . Load Combination Self Wt BLC BLC 'BLC BLC ------------ BLC W E No. Description Dir Fac Fac Fac Fac. Fac Fac DYNA S V 5 DL + LL + SEIS 2 1 3 1 4 1 . y y 6 .85DL .+ SEIS 2 .85 4 1 . . Y Y Dynamic Analysis Data Number of modes (frequencies) .: 3 Basic Load Case for masses : None BLC mass direction of action : X only Acceleration of Gravity : 32.20 ft/sec**2 E: ENVELOPE SOLUTION Nodal Displacements . Node Global X Global Y . ' Rotation ------------ (in) -------LC-----------(in)-------LC----------(rad) --7--LC- 1 max 0.00000 6 0.00000 6 -0.00001 3 mm '' -0.000.00 3 . -0.00000 3 -0.00073 5 2 max ' 0.10097 6 0.01490 6 0.00001 3 mm -0.00000 3 ,. -0.01051 3 . -0.00081 6'. 3 max ' . 0.19229 6. ' 0.01490 6 , 0.00002 3 mm -0.00201 3 . -0.01051 3. -0.00088 6 4 • .max , 0.00000 5 . -0.00000 3 -0.00001 3 mm ' 0.00000 3 . . -0.00000 5 -0.00073 5 max 0.10097 6 ' -0.00527 3 0.00001 3 mm -0.00000 3 -0.02272 5 . -0.00081 6 6 max 0.19229 6 . ' . -0.00527 3 0.00002 3 mm -0.00201 3 . , -0.02272 5 -0.00088 6 7 max 0.08355 6 -0.00563 • 6 -0.00001 3 mm -0.00000 3 . -0.02316 3 -0.00013 5 8 max 0.16874 6 ' -0.00193 6 . . 0.00002 3 mm -0.00201 3 • '-0.00789 ' 3 -0.00012 6 ENVELOPE SOLUTION , Reactions . .• .. ,,. , . , Node Global X Global ,Y Moment ----------- ---------- (K) ------- LC ----------- (K) ------LC----------(K-ft)----LC- 1 max 9.74948 3 24.21106 3 0.00000 3 mm -34.09994 6 . -53.88672 6 ' 0.00000 3 3 76.59940 5 . 0.00000 3 . 4 max , -9.74948 mm -46.21948 S 5 16.82894 .3 . .0.0.0000 3 RISA-2D (R) Version 3.03 DASSE Design, Inc. S Job Page Date_________ FRAME. 2.5, SCHUMACHER BLDG. 1979 . . I. 'FILENAME:SFRAM25.R2D, M. ---------------------------- POWER ENVELOPE SOLUTION Member Section Results Nodes Member Quarter Points No I' J I-End 1/4 1/2 3/4 ii )(,,)(,,)LC(K,Kft,in)LC(K,Kft,ifl)LC 1 1- 2 'A 14.81 '14.81 3 14.81 3' 14.81 3 14.81 3 -21.00 6,,'-21.00 6 -21.00 6 -21.00 6 -21.00 6 V 0.00 3' 1 000 3 0.00 3 ' 0.00 3 0.00. 3 -0.00 6 ' -0.00 6 -0.00 6 '-0.00 '6 -0.00 '6 0.00. 6 0.01 6 0.02 6 0.03 6 0.04 6 -0.00 5 -0.00 .3 . -0.00 3 -0.00 3 -0.01 3 0.000 3 -0.000 3 -'0.000 ,3 -0.000 3 0.000 3 .0.000. 3 -0.024 5 -0.04.9 5' -0.075 5 -0.101 6 2 '2- 3 A 0.00 6 0.00 6 0.00 6 0'.00 '. 6 0.00 6 .0.00 3 0.00 3 0.00 '3 0.00 3 0.00 3 V , 0.00 6 ' 0.00 '6, 9.00 6 0.00 6 0.00 6 -0.00 3 -0.00 3 . -0.00 3 -0.00 3. . -0.00 3 M 0.04 6 ..' 0.03 .6 0.02 6 0.01 6 0.00 6 -0.01 3 -0.00 3 '-0.00' 3 ' -0.00 3 -0.00 .3 o D . 0.000 0.000 3 3 0.000. -0.022 3 6 0.001 -0.045 3 .6 . 0.001.3 -0068, 6 -0.002 -0.091 3 6 '3' 4- 5 A. 32.02 5 32'.02 5 3202 5 32.02 5 32.02 5 7.43 3 7.43 3 7.43 3 7.43 3 7.43 '3 V . 0.00 '3 0.00 3 0.00 3 0.00 3 0.00 3 . . , . -0.00 '6 -0.00 6 -0.00 6 -0.00 6 -0.00' 6 M 0.00 6 0.01 .6 , . .0'.02 6 0.03 6 0.04 '6 -.0.00 5 . -0.00:3 -0.00 .3 '-0.00 3 -0.01' 3 P 0.000 3 -0.000 . 3 -0.000 3 -0.000 3 0.000 3 0.000 3 -0.024 5 -0.049 5 -0.075 5 -0.101 6 4 5- 6 A 0.00 3 . 0.00 .3 0.00 3 0.90 3 0.00. 3 • 0.0O 3 0.00 '3 ' 0.00 3 0.00 3 0.00 .3' V "0.00 6 '0.00 ' 6 0.00 6 0.00 6 0.00 6 -0.00 3 -0.00 3 -0.00 3 -0.00 3 -0.00 3 M '0.04' 6 0.03 6. 0.02 6 001 6 0.00 6' -0.01 3 -0.00 3 -0.00 3 -0.00 3 -0.00 3 D 0.000 3 0.1000 3- 0.001 3 0.001 3 0.002 3 0.000 3 -0.022 6 -0.045 6 -0.068 6 -0.091 6 5 2- 7 A 36:47 6 36.47 6 36.47 6 36'.47 • 6 36.47 6 - -0.00 3 -0.00 .3 "-0.00 3 -0.00 3 -0.00 .3 1.27 3 1.27 3 1.27 3 -2.47 6 -2.47 ' 6 -0.31 6 0.31 6 0.316 -10.16 3' -10.16 3.. M 0.00 .3 -0.89 6 -1.78 .6' ' -2.02 6 21.03 3 . . • 0.00. 3 73.66 3 -7.32 3 '' -8.29 3 5.11. 6 . D . 0.029 5 0.013 6. . 0.006 6 • 0.002. 6 0.000 '3 0.012 3 -• -0.002 3 -0.010 3 -0.008 3 0.000 3 RISA-2D (R). Version 3.03 9IOI3 DASSE Design, Inc. Page Date_________ FRAME 2.5, SCHUMACHER BLDG. 1979. AS //7 /1 'FILENAME:SFRAM25.R2D, N. POWER Nodes , Member Quarter Points No I J :, I--End 1/4 1/2 3/4 J-End --------------(K',Kft,in.)LC(K,Kft,in)LC(K,Kft,in)LC(K,Kft,in)LC(K,Kft,in)LC-- 6 7- 5 'A 0.00 3 0.00 3 0.00 '3. 0.00 3 0.00 3 -36.47 6 -36.47 6 ' -36.47 6 '-36.47 6 -36.47 6 V ' 8.64 3 8.64 3 -0.51 6 -0.51 6 ' -0.51 6 2.10 6 '2.10 .6 -2.10 3 -2.10 3 -2.10 3 M 21.03 3' -0.95 6 -2.94 6 -1.47 6 0.00 3 5.11 6 -3.91 3 -12.09 3 -6.05 3 -0.00 6 D 0.000 3- -0.007 6 -0.012 6 -0.003 3 0.018 3' 0.000 3 -0.014 5 -0.023 5 -0.016 5 -0.013 6 7 3- 8 A 32.00 5 32.00 5 32.00 5 32.00 5 32.00 5 0.00 3, , 0.00 -.3 ', 0.00 3 0.00 3 0.00 3 V ., -0.00 3 -0.00 .3 -0.00 3 -0.00' 3 -0.00 '3 ' -0.00 5 -0.00 5 -0.00 5 -0.00 5 -0.00 5 • . N ' 0.00 3. 0.00' 5' 0.00 5 0.00 5 0.00 5 -0.00 .3 0.00. 3 ' . 0.00 3. 0.00 3 0.00 3 D 0.017 6 '0.013 '6 0.008 '6 0.004 6 0.000 3 ' -0.003 3 -0.002 3 -0.001' 3 -0.001 3 0.000 3 . 8 8- 6 A -0.00 -32.00 '3 5 -0.00 -32.00 3 5 -0.00 -32.00 3 5 -0.00 -32.00 3 5 -0.00 -32.00 3 .5 V 0.00. 5 0.00' 5. 0.00 5 ' 0.00 5 0.00 5 ' , -0.00 6 -0.00 6 -0.00 6 -0.00 6 , '-0.00 6 M '0.00 5 0.00 5 0.00' 5 0.00 5 0.00 6 -0.00 6 -0.00 6 '-0.00 3 -0.00 3 • -0.00 3 D 0.000 3 0.001 3 0.001 -3 0.002 3 ' 0.003 3 0.000 3 -0.004 6 -0.008 6 -0.013 6 -0.017 6 9 1- 7 A 13.55 3 13.55 3 13.55 3 13.55 3 13.55 3 -47.38 6 .-47.38 6 • -47.38 6 • -47.38 6 -47.38 6 V ' 0.00 3 ' 0.00 '3 0.00 3 0.00 3 0.00 3 -0.00 -'6 '-0.00 6 -0.00 6 -0.00 6 -0.00 6 M 0.00. '3 0.00 6 0.00 6 000 6 0.00 6 0.00 3 -0.00 3' -0.00 3 -0.00 3 -0.00 3 D 0.000 3 '-0.002 3 -0004 3 -0.006' 3 ' -0.008 3 0.000 3 -0.016 5 . -0.031 5 -0.047 5 -0.063 5 10 7- 4 A 64.22 5 64.22 5 64.22 5 64.22 5 64.22 5 13.54 3 13.54 3 13.54 3 13.54 3 13.54 3' V. 0.00 6 0.00 6 0.00 6 0.00 6 0.00 6 . '' • . -0.00 3 -0.00 3 -0.00 3 '-0.00 3 -0.00 3 M 0.00 3 ' 0.00 3' 0.00 3 0.00 3 0.00 3 0.00 -'3 -0.00 6. -0.00 6 -0.00 6 -0.00 6 • D . 0.000 3 '0.002 3 0.004 3 0.006 '3 0.007 3 . , .0.000 3 • 0.000 6 0.001 6 0.001 .6 0.002 6 RISA-2D (R) Version 3.03 DASSE Design, Inc. Job 'tOI3X Page 5-2..o Date_________ FRAME 2.5, SCHUMACHER BLDG. 1979 .• FILENAME:SFRAM25.R2D,M. POWER Nodes Member Quarter Points No I J I-End 1/4 1/2 3/4 J-End --------(K,Kft,in)LC(K,Kft,in)LC(K,Kft,±n)LC(K,Kft,in)LC(K,Kft,in)LC-- 11 2 8 A -0.00 3. -0.00 3 -0.00 3 -0.00 3 -0.00 3 -40.36 5 -40.36 5 -40.36 _5 -40.36 5 -40.36 5 V 0.00 6 0.00 6 0.00 6 0.00 6 0.00 6 -0.00 3 -0.00 3 -0.00 3 -0.00 3 -0.00 3 M 0.00 3 0.00 3 0.00 3 0.00 3 0.00 3 0.00 3 . 70.00 6 -.0.00 6: -0.00 6 -0.00 6 •D 0.0003: 0.001 3 0.001 3 0.002 3 0.003 3. 0.000 3 -0.024 6 -0.048 6 -0.072 6 -0.096 6 12 8 5 A 40.36 5 40.36 5 . 40.36 5 40.36 5 40.36 5 0.00 3 0.00 3 0.00 3 0.00 3 0.00 3 0.00 5 0.00 5 0.00 5 : .•QQ 5 . 0.00 5 -0.00 3 -0.00 3 -0.00 3 -000 3 -0.00 3 M 0.00 3 0.00 3 0.00 3 0.00 3 0.00 3 : 0.00 3. -0.00. .5 -0.00. 5 -0.00 5 -0.00 5 D 0.000 3 0.012 .5 0.04 5 •' 0.036 5 0.048 5 0.000 3 0.001 3 0.002 3 0.003 3 0.003 3 'ENVELOPE SOLUTION . • . . AISC Code Checks : . • : ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Nodes Member Quarter Points No I J, Max i,c 0 ic 1/4 lc 1/2 lc 3/4 lc L lc Shear lc 1 1-2 0.178 3 0.18 3 0.18 3 0.18 3 0.18 3 0.183 0.00 6 2 2- 3 0.003 6 .0.00 6 0.00 6 0.00 6 0.00 6 0.00 6 0.00 6 3 4- 5 0.289 5 0.29 5 0.29 5:0.29 5 0.29 5 0.29 50.00 6 4 5- 6 0.003 6 0.00 6 0.00 6 0.00 6 0.00 6 0.00 3 0.00 6 5 2- 7 0.298 5 0.13 6 0.16 .5 0.19 •5 0.20. 5 0.30 5 0.18 3 6 7- 5 0.290. 5 0.29 5 0.16 5 0.22 5 .0.17 5 0.13 . .0.15 3 7 3- 8 0.187 5 0.19 5 0.19 5 0.19 5 0.19, 5 0.19 5 0.00 5 8 8- 6 0.171 5 0.17 5 0.17, 5 0.17 5-' 0.17 5 0.17 5 0.00 6 9 1- 7 • 0.294 6 0.29 6. 0.29 6 0.29 6: 0.29 6 0.29 6 0.00 6 10 • 7- 4 0.572 5 0.57 5 0.57 5 0.57 5 • 0.57 5 0.57 5 0.00 6 11 2- 8 0.251 5 0.25 5 0.25 5 0.25 5 0.25 5 0.25 5 0.00 6 12 8- 5 0.341 5 0.34 5 0.3.4 5 0.34 5 0.34 5 0.34 5 0.00 5 ENVELOPE SOLUTION .. • . • • Alternate Sections . • Section Suggested Alternatives • S • Set S S • S ------------------------------------ COL W8X15 S8X18 4 58X23 BEAM W12X16 W1OX17 W10X19 W10X22 • 510X25.4 RISA-2D (R) Version 3.03 PASSE Design,. Inc. Job 1ol3 X 11 Page _ Date_________ 6' FRAME 2.5, SCHUMACHER BLDG: 1979 .. A3'//t'7 FILENAME:SFRAM25'-.R2D, M. POWER 1 - Units Option : US Standard AISC Code Checks : 9th Edition ASD . Shear Deformation: No 'P-Delta Effects : No Redesign - : Yes Edge Forces : No A.S'.I..F. : 1.333 Node , . ' Boundary'. Conditions No X-Coord Y-Coord X-dof Y-dof. ,, Rotation Temp.- ------- ~(f t) ---------. (ft)'---- (in,K/in) --- (in,K/in) --- (r,Kft/r) ----2(F) - 1. ' .0.00 , . '0.00 R . . 'R '. . 0.00 2' 0.00 11.13 . . . -'- 0.00 . . . o 3 0.00 20.00 4 . 23.08 ' . 0.00 . . ' .' . •, . 0.00 R' . 0.00 .5 23.08 ' ' 11.13 '. . ' 0.00 6 ' 23.08 20.00 0.00 7 -: 11.54 ' 11.13 0.00 .8 " 11.54 20.00- 0.00 Material - Elastic. Poisson's - Thermal ' Weight - Yield Stress . Label' ' Modü1us I Ratio 'Coefficient Density , (Fy) -- '(Ksi)----------------- -------- ---------- ----------- (F) ---------- (K/ft3)'-----.- (Ksj)'---- STL. - 29000.00. 0.30000 0.65000 0.490 .36.000 'Section - Database Mati. ' 'Area 'Moment of As ' y/y Label . Shape - ' • Set' ' , . ' '- Inertia' : Coéf ---------------------- --------------- ----(inA2) ------- __(inA4) -------------1---------- COL ' W10X22- ' ' STL. - . 6.49 . '. 11.400 ' - 120 1 BEAN' •, - W14X341 - : STL. , 10.00' - ' 340.000 1.20 - ' BRACE1 ' - TU6X6X4' : STL." 5.59 , 30.300 - 1.20 BRACE2 "TUGX6X4 - - STL." " 5.59 . . 30.300 . 1.20 - STRUT '- W10X22 , . STL. ' 6.49 - - 118.0-00 ' 1.20 - I J ' • I 'Releases J - End Offsets Node Node Section " x.y z -. S No xy z' Sec Sway I J . , Length -------------------------------------(in) - - --(in) - ------ (ft) COLF ---------- ---- - 2 - 1 , 1 -- . ' " ' ' Y - " , ' . 11.13 2 2- ,3'COL 8.87, ISA-2D (R): VersiOn 3.03 DASSE Design, Inc ' ' Job i\h(o:sxl • " " • . . . '. . S •Page_S-z-2-- Date _________ FRAME 2.5 SCHUMACHER BLDG 1979 FILENAME': SFRAM25- .R2D, M. POWER. ---------------------------- I ,J ' • . I R'e1eases J .'., End Offsets • No Node Node Section ,x'y z x y,z Sec Sway I. J Length, . ------------- ------------------------------------------'-'(in)'--- (in) -i---- (ft) 3 . ' ': , 4. '5 COL ' .,. , : • - . •• :11.13, 4 5 - 6 COL 8..87 2- '7 'BEAM:" . ,1 . , ' ,,,, -• :' 11.54 6- .7- 5 BEAM ' , ' ' ' .-1. . . 11.54. 7 -'3 8 STRUT 8 8 -- 6 STRUT 11.54 9 1- 7 BRACE1 16.03 10 ' 7 -' 4 'BRACEl 16 .03 11 :2 '. 8YBRACE2 14.56. 12 8 - 5, BRACE2 ;. 1 ' '1. ' ' ' 14.56 I J. , Unbracëd.. Lengths K Factors 'Bending Coefs' No' Node Node Lb-in ', Lb-out' Lc' •, ' In . ' Out . ' Cm -, Cb - ---------(ft)-- -- (ft) - ---- 1 1- 2' • ':, ,: .. , ..S,.3 4 ', 4 ' - 6 •- •• 'S'S . S ,,• ' 5 , 2- 7 . '. .o.00'•' -.': . ., ' ,' ' 67- 5 . , .0.00 5 7 3 '8 .2.00' '8' -8'- 6 •. '2.00 9 1- 7 10 7- 4 11 2 - 8 12 .8-5 5"• -.5 '- " '' ' S ' Section Set : Depth Range . Width Range.Unity Check Range -.' Max' -Mm - Max - 'Mm Max - Mm ---- (in) -----(ia) ----------------"ftn) ------------------------- COL 10.00,- 800 . ,- . S 0.9000 0.5000 BEAM '- - .12.00 ' 10.00 ' . . ' . . , 0.9000 - 9.5900 Basic Load.Case '. Load-Totals S S No. ' . Description '' - Nodal -Point - Dist.,' ' 2 DEAD LOAD' (50 -PS F) 2'' 2 -- - 3 LIVE LOAD' (125 PSF) .' S , 2 - 2, 4 SEISMIC 4 RISA-2D (R) Version 3.03 DASSE Design, Inc. ••, Job________ Page _5-2 Date_________ FRAME 2 5, SCHUMACHER BLDG 1979 //17/6P FILENAME:SFRAJ125- .R2D, M. POWER ---------------- -- Noda1 Loads, BLC 2: DEAD LOAD (50 PSF) Node Number. Global X . Global Y Moment --------------- ---- -------- (K) -------------------(K) ------------------ 2 0.000 -3.870 0.000 5. . 0.000 -1.570 0.000 Member Point Loads,BLC 2 DEAD LOAD (50 PSF) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Memb I J No Node Node DirectiOn Magnitude Location --------- - ------------- -------- ---------- (K, K-ft, F) ------------------ (ft) ------- .5 2 - 7 Y -3.270 . 8.420 6 7 - 5 Y -3.070 4.210 Nodal Loads, BLC 3 LIVE LOAD (125 PSF) Node • • Number ,. . ' GlObal X ' . Global Y Moment --K- ---- --- ------------- . (K) ------------------(K-ft) S------------------------- 2 • 0.000 , , . -9.670 . 0.000 5 0 000 -3.760 0.000 Member Point Loads,BLC 3: LIVE LOAD (125 PSF). . Memb I J •. . ,. No, Node Node Direction . -Magnitude Location ------------------------ - ----------------- (K,K-ft,F) -----------------'ft) ------ 5 , 2 - 7 ' • Y • • • • -8.160 8.420 6 ' 7 - 5. Y . -7.670 . '4.210 Nodal Loads, BLC 4: SEISMIC , • • Node . •• , •• . Number • . . Global'X . Global Y . Moment ------------------ ' -------(K)--------------------(K) ------------------ (K-ft) ---- 2 • ,. -4.470 ' . 0.000 , , 0.000 5' . . .. -4.470 0.000 , 0.000 3 . . ' -32.000 ' 0.000 . 0.000 6 -32 000 0.000 0.000 Load Combination Self Wt BLC BLC BLC BLC . BLC W No. Description 'Dir Fac Fac,, H Fac Fac Fac ' Fac DYNA S V -;-]i:ONLY 3DL+LL '21 31 y 4 SEISMIC ONLY H . 4 1 , • ,. RISA-2D (R) 'Version 3.03 DASSE.Design, Inc. Page Date_________ FRAME 2.5, SCHUMACHER BLDG. 1979 FILENAME:SFRAN25- .R2D, M. POWER ' Load Combination Self Wt BLC BLC BLC BLC BLC W E. No. Description Dir Fac , Fac Fac Fac' Fac. Fac DYNA S V 5DL+LL+SEI8 21' 31 41 .' •Y Y 6 .85DL + SEIS 2 .85 41 . Y Y Dynamic Analysis Data Number of modes (frequencies) .: 3 Basic Load Case 'for masses : None BLC mass direction Of action : X only Acceleration of Gravity 32.20 ft/sec**2 . . ENVELOPE SOLUTION . .. . . . . Nodal Displacements . . . . Node Global X " Global Y ' . ., Rotation --------- -------------- (in)- ------- LC- -- - ------ (in) ------- tC ---------- (rad) ----- LC- max ' '-0.00000 min 0.00000 3. 5 . -0.00000 -0.00000 3 5 0.00073 -0:00001 6 3 2 max , -0.00000 3 -0.01051 3 . . . 0.00083 " 5 mm -0.10097' 5 ' . -0.02796 .5 . .. 0.00001 3 3 max ' -0.00201 3 '. T0•01051 3' . 0.00091 5 min - -0.19478 5 -0.02796 5 0.00002 3 4 max 0.00000 3 0.00000 6 0.00073 6 mm -0.00000 6 -0.00000 3".' , -0.00001 3 ' 5' max , -0.00000 3 , 0.01614. 6 0.00083 ' 5 mm -0.10097 5 -0.00527 3 '0.00001 ' 3 6 max -0.00201 3 " ' '0.01614 6 . 0.00091 5 ' min -0:19478 5 . -0.00527 3 ' 0.00002 3 7 max ' '. -0.00000 3 -0.00563 6 .0.00012 6 mm -0.08355 5 -0.02316 3 , -0.00001 3 8 max -0.00201 3 . -0.00193 6 ' 0.00014 .5 mm ' -0.17124 5 , -0.00789 3 ' : 0.00002 3 ENVELOPE SOLUTION Reactions ' , Node Global X . 'Global Y . ' . Moment --------------------- (K) ------LC-------------'(K) ------LC-----------(K-ft) ----LC- 1 max . 46.21948 5. 83.98151 '5 . . 0.00000 3 min 9.74948 3' , .24.21106 3 . . ' ' 0.00000 • 3 'max • 4 34.09994 6 . '16.82894, 3 . . 0.00000 .3 mm, -9.74'948 3 ' . -55.64.120 .6. 0.00000 3 RISA-2D (R) Version 3.03 DASSE Design, Inc.'-,Job. 1.(Eot3 XI Page _ Date_____ FRAME 2 5, SCHUMACHER BLDG 1979 1/17 /( FILENAME:SFRAM25- .R2D, M. POWER ENVELOPE SOLUTION Member Section Results Nodes Member'Quarter Points No I J,-, I-End 1/4 1/2 ' 3/4 J-End -------------- ---(K,Kft,in)LC(K,Kft,in)LC(K,Kft;j'fl)Lc(K,'Kft,in)Lc(.K,Kft,jn)Lc.._ 1 1 2 A 39.40 5 39.40 5 39.40 '5 39.40 5 39.4.0 5 14.81 3 14.81 .3 14.81 3' 14.81 3 14.81 3 V 000 5 000 5 000 5 000 5 000 5 • 0.00 3 0.00 3 '.' 0.00 3 '0.00 3 0.00 3 M 0.09 6 -0,.00 3 -0.00 3 -0.00 3 -0.01 3 -0.00 3 -0.01 '5 -0.02 '5 -0.03 5 -0.04 5 D 0.000 3 0.024 '6 0.049 6 '0.074 6 0.101. 5 , 0.000 3 -0.000 3 -0'.000 3 -0.000 3 0.000 3 2 2- 3 A " '0.00 3 0.00 3 0.00 3' 0.00 3 0.00 3 -0.00 6 . -0.00 6 -0.00 6 -0.00 6 -0.00 6 V -0.00, 3 -0.00 3 -0.00 3 '. -0.00 3 -0.00 3 70.00 5' -0.00 5 -0.00 '5 ' -0.00 '5 -0.00 5 N . -0.01 3 .. -0.00 3 -0.00 3 -0.00. 3. 0.00 6 -0.04 '.5 -0.03' 5' -0.02 '5 -0.01 . 5 -0.00 5 D, 0.000 3 0.022 :5 0.046 5 0.070 ' 5 .. 0.094 '5 S . 0.000 3 0.000 3' . 0.001 3 0.001 .3 0.002 3 3 4- 5 A 7.43 3 7.43 3 7.43 , 3 7.43 3 7.43 3 -22.75 . 6 -22.75 ',6 -22.75 6 -22.75 6 -22.75 6 V 0.00 5 0.00 5 '0.00 ' 5 0.00." 5 0.00 5,". 0.00 3 '.0.00 3' 0.00 '3 0.00 3 ' 0.00 3 M , ''0.00 5 -0.00 '3 -0.00 3 -0.00 3 ' -0.01 3 -0.00 6 -0.01 5 -0.02 5 -0.03 5 -0.04 5 D 0.000 .3 ' 0.024, 6 0.049 6 . 0.074 6 . 0.101 .5. .0.000. 3., -0.000 3 ,-.0.000 3 ' -0.000 3, 0.000 3 4 5-1 6 A • 0.00 6 0.00 6 0.00 6 ' 0.00 6 0.00 6 0.00 3 0.00 3. ' 0.00 3 0.00 3 0.00 3 V '' -0.00'' 3 ' -0.00 3 . -0.00 3 -0.00 • , 3, -0.00 3 -0.00 5 -0.00 5 -0.00 5 -0.00 5 -0.00 5 M 0.01 3 -0.00 3 • -0.00 3 " -0.00 ' 3 . 0.00 6 -0.04 5 -0.03 5 -0.02 5 -0.01 5 . -0.00 5' D 0.000 3 '0.022 5 " 0.046 5 • 0.070 5 '0.094 5 0.000 3 0.000 '3 . 0.001 • 3 0.001 3 0.0.02 3 5 2- 7 A'. -0.00 3 -0.00 3 " -0.00 3 -0.00 3 -0.00 3 -36.47 5 -36.47 5 -36.47 5 , -36.47 5 -36.47 5 V 1.27 3 •' 1.27 3. 1.27 '3 -2.47 6 • -2.47 6 0.31 6 , 0.31 6 0.31. 6 -10.16 3 -10.16 3 M 0.00 3 -0.89 .6 -1.78 6 -2.02 6 21.03 3 0.00 3 -3.66 3 -7'.32 3 -8.29 3 5.11. 6 D , 0.012 3 -0.002 3 70.010 3' -0.006 6 0.000 3'' • -0.015. 6 -0.015 5 -0.019 5 -0.012 5 0.000. 3 RISA-2D (R) Version 3.03 DASSE Design, Inc. Job_________ Page _5-2L Date_________ FRAME 2 5, SCHUMACHER BLDG 1979 A-;/// /& FILENAME:SFRAM25-.R2]Y,M. POWER Nodes Member Quarter Points No I J I-End 1/4 1/2 3/4 J-End --------------(K,Kft,in)LC(K,Kft,in)LC(K,Kft,jn)LC(K',Kft,jn)LC(K,.Kft,.in)LC_. 6 7 5 A 36.47 5 36.47 5 36.47 5 36.47 5 36.47 5 0.00 3 0.00 3 0.00 3 0.00 3 0.00 3 V 8.64 3' 8.64 .3 -0.51 6 -0.51 6 -0.51 6 '2.10 6 2.10 61 -2.10 3 -2.10 3 -2.10 3 M 21.03 3 -0.95 6 -2.94 6 -1.47 6 0.00 3 . • 5.11 6. -3:91 3 -12.09 3. -6.05 3 -0.00 6 D 0.000 3 0.002 .6 0.005 6' 0.012 6 0.035 5 0.000 3 70.009 3 -0'.014 3 -0.003 3 0.018 3 7 3- 8 A . 0.00 3 0.00 3 0.00 3 0.00 3 0.00 3 • -32.00 6 -32.00 6 -32.00 6 -32.00 6 -32.00 6 V 0.00 5' 0.00 5 ' .0.00 5 0.00 5 0.00 5 • 70.00 6 -0.00 6 -0.00 6 -0.00 6 -0.00 6 M 0.00 3 .0.00 6. 0.00 6 0.00 6 0.00 6 0.00 3 -0.00 5 -0.00 5. -0.00 5 -0.00 5 D -0.003 3 -0.002 3 -0.001 . 3 -0.001 3 0.000 3 -0.020 5 -0.015 5 '-0.010 5 . -0.005 5 0.000 3 '6 8- A. 32.00 6 32.0p 6' 32.00. 6 32.00 6 .32.00 6' S B -0.00 3 -0.00 3 -'0.00 3 -0.00 3 -0.00 3 V 0.00 6 0.00 6 '0.00 6 ' 0.00 6 ' 0.00 6 ' 0.003. 0.00 3 .0.00 3 . 0.00 3 '0.00 3 M 000 6' 0.00 6 0.00 6 -0.00 3 ' ' -0.00 3 -0.00 3 -0.00 5 -0.00 .5 -0.00 5 -0.00 '5 D 0.000 3 0.005 .5 0.010 5 .0.015 5 0.020 5 0.000 3 0.001 3 0.001 3 0.002 3 . 0.003 3 9 . 1- 7 A 64.22 5 64.22 5 64.22 5 64.22 5 .64.22 5 13.55 3' 13.55 3 1355 3 , 13.55 3 13.55 3 V '0.00 s 0.00 :s ' 0.00 5 .. 0.00 5 .0.00. 5 -0.00 6 • -0.00 .6 -'0.00 6 -0.00 6 -0.00 .6 M , 0.00 3 0.00 '6 0.00 '6 0.00 6 0.00 6'' 0.00 ' 3 -0.00 5 -0.00 5. -0.00 5 -0.00 5 D : 0.000 '3'. 0.013 6 0.026 '6 0.039. 6 0.053 6 0.000 3 ' -'0.002 3 -0.004. 3' -0.006 3 • '-0.008 3 10 7- 4 A 13.54 3 13.54 3 13.54 3. 13.54 3 13.54 3 -47.38 6 -47.38 ' 6 -47.38 6 47:38 6 -47.38 ' 6 V -0.00 3 • -0.00 3 -0..00 3 -0.00 3 -0.00 3 -0.00 5 '-0.00 5 -0.00 5 -0.00 5 '-0-00 5 M 0.00 3 0.00 '5 0,.00 S 0.00 5 0.00 5 0.00. 3 '0.00 3 ' 0.00 3 0.00 3 0.00. 3 ID 0.000 .3 0.002.3. '1 0.904 3 0.006 3 6.007 3 • 0.000 3 0.000 '6" 0 ,001 6 0.001 6 0.002 6 .-. .•• •, •. RISA-2D'(R) Version '3.03 - DASSE Design, Inc. ' ':. •" ... Job 5it, S_<i Page____ Date' SFRAME 2:5, SCHUMACHER BLDG. 1979 FILENAME:SFRAM25- .R2D, 'M. POWER ------------------ Nodes Member Quarter Points No I J I-End 1/4 .' 1/2 3/4 J-End ---------------- (K,Kft,in)LC.(K,Kft,in)LC(K,Kft,in)LC'(K,Kft,in)LC(K,Kf.t,in)LC 11 2- 8 'A 40.36 6 40.36 6 40.36 6 40.36 6 40.36 .6 -0.00 '3 -0.00 3 -.0.00 3 -0.00 3 -0.00.3 V -0.00 3 " -0.00 3 -0.00 3. -0.00 3 70.00 '3 -0.00 5 -0.00. 5 -0.00 5 -0.00 5 -0.00 .5 M 0-. 00 3 . .00 '5 0.00 5' 0.005 0.00 5 0.00 3 '0.00 3 0.00 ''3'. 0.00 3 0.00 '3 D 0.000 3 0.025 5 0.050 5 0.075 5 0.100 5 0.000 '3 0.001 3 'O.O61 3 0.002 3 0.003 3 12 8- 5 A . 0.00 '3' 0.00 .3 .0.00 31 0.00 3 ' 0.00 '3 -40.36 6 -40.36 6 . -40.36 6 -40.36 6 -40.36 6 V -0.00 "3 0.00 3 -0.00 3 -0.00 3 0.00 3 -0.00 5 . -0.00 5 '-000 '5 . '-0.00 5 -0.00 5 M '0.00 3 '0 00 5 ".0.00 '5 0.00 5 A.00 5 0.00 3 .0.00 3 0.00 3 0.00 3 0.00 3 D '0.000 3' 0.001 ' 3 0.002 3 0.003 3 0.003 3'.: 0.000 -0.011 6 -0.0,22 6' -0.033 6 -0.044 6 ENVELOPE SOLUTION AISC Code Checks Nodes ' , . Member Quarter Points No I J Max ic 0 lc 1/4 lc, 1/2" lc 3/4 lc L lc Shear ic - 1 - 1- 2 0,.358 5 0.35 5 0-.35 50 36 5 0.36 5 0.36 5 0,00 5 2 , 2- 3" 0.004 5 0.00 '5 0.00 5' 0.00 ' 5 0.00 5 0.00 6. 0.00. 5 3. 4- '5 0.125 6. 0.12 6 0.12 .6 0.12 .6 .0.12 6 0.12 6. 0.00' '5 4 5- 6. 0.004 5' '0.00 5 0.00 .5. 0.00 5 0.00 5 0.00. 6 .0.00 5 .5 2-, 7, 0.290., 51 0.13 .5 016 .5 0.18 5 0.19 5 0.29 5'. 0.18 3 6. • 7- .5 .0.298' 5 0.30 '5 .0. 1'6 5. '0.23 '5 0.18 '5 0.13 5 0.15 3 7 3- 8 0.171 6 0.17 '6 0.17 6 0.17 6 0.17 '6 0.17 .6 • 0.00 6 8 •8-. 6 0.187 :6 0.196 0.19 6,0.19 6 0.19. 6'0.19 6' 0.00 6 ' 9 1- 7 0.572 5 0.57' 5:0.57 5 0.57 50.57 5 0.57 5 0.00 '6' 10 '7- 4 '.0.294 6' 0.29' 6 0.29 6 0.29 6 0.29 6 .0.29 6 0.00 5 ii 2- 8 '0.341 6 0.34 6' 0.34 '6' 0.34 6 0.34 6 .0.34 6 0.00 5 12 8--" 5 0.251 6 0.25 6 0.25 6. 0.25 6 0.25, 6 0.25 6 0.00 5 ENVELOPE SOLUTION ': • ' •" ' ' •. Alternate Sections , ' • .'.. • . . ' . " .' : , ------------------------------------ Section • • • Suggested Alternatives- Set, . . , . .. •, • :' , " 'COL S8X23 • 510x25.4 ' ' •. . •• ' • . BEAM • W12X16 • 'W1OX17 • ' ' W10X19 • W10X22' . , ' S10X25.4 • DASSE DESIGN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC. IRVINE -i i71 PROJECT 9) JO( PAGE BY DATE Jr Zc CKDBY_ --------DATE i/if cL JPLIFT O,!,DL M UL11 fl 'M,J .• (12— 14- . F-Tdl bLLL / I - DASSE DESIGN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC. 61 I IRViNE PROJECT_X I'I X PAGE - S BY - - DATE 'MIO CKDBY -------DATE - - - TNT - v-&-c2' • • : • • • 0 - Tj AL,L)uj k/ P -s( ) )• 0 S Jo e J j 7; L1 / rAL Sy.. M1J S - DASSE DESIGN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC. IRVINE -79 PROJECT )OI)<'IPAGE -, • BY - DATE w • CKDBY - - - - - -DATE 7N'iI-' •1 • '/7/1c 3Hfl ( • AA I Ti' . • ____-.___ •• • ptp c-j_ I! I (D, i tP.r, Aie r • II I I TY --• I I! - v.i o • : '. ' - 0 10 ('r rLri) A7 (.p A) 0 VALu-) T II • 0• 0 Lo - vrt ( T - - r'r IJ Jo,o oL 00 •0 0 C..oL. (/ LtrU 4'- 0 I 10 0 0 TABLE 23-I-K-i—ALLOWABLE SHEAR FOR WIND OR SEISMIC FORCES IN POUNDS PER FOOT FOR WOOD STRUCTURAL PANEL SHEAR WALLS WITH FRAMING OF DOUGLAS FIR-LARCH OR SOUTHERNPINE1,2 - PANEL GRADE MINIMUM NOMINAL PANEL THICKNESS (Inches) MINIMUM NAIL PENETRATION IN FRAMING (Inches) PANELS APPLIED DIRECTLY TO FRAMING PANELS APPLIED OVER / CH (13 mm) OR 5/8-1NCH (16 mm) GYPS?MIN SHEAThING Nail Size (Common or Galvanize Box) Nail Spacing at Panel Edges (in.) . Nail Size GalvanIzed Box) Nail Spacing at Panel Edges (In.) x25.4 for mm (Common 25.4 for mm 6 4 2 6 23 x 25.4 t r mm x 0.0146 for N/mm x 0.0146 for N/mm /16 11/4 6d 200 300 -390 510 8d 200 300 390 510 Structural I /8 11/ 15 62 280 8d 2304. 3604 4604 6I0 . 10d5 280 430 550 730 /16 '2554 3954 5054 670, 430 .550 730 15/32 1 /8 I0d5 340 51,0 665 870 - - - - - C-D /l6 11/4 6d 180 270 350 450 8d 180- 270 350 450 3/ 200 300 390 510 200 300 390 510 Sheathing, plywood panel siding and other covered in t6 U.B.C. Standard 23-2 0r23-3 /grades 1 /2 15/37 8d 2204 3204 4104 5304 I0d5 260 380 490 640 - 240 350 45Q4 • 585 260 380 490 640 1 /8 9/32 10d5 ' 310 460 600 770 - - -. - - 340 510 665 870 - . - - Nail Size (Galvanized Casing) . (Galvanized Nail Size Casing) Plywood pane) siding in grades /16 1/4 6d 140 210 275 360 8d 140 210 275 360 covered in U.B.C. Standard 23-2 - /8 11/2 8d 160 240 310 410, 10d5 160 240, 310 410 (0 (0 A z All panel edges backed with 2-inch (51 mm) nominal or wider framing. Panels installed either horizontally or vertically. Space nails at 6 inches (152 mm) on Center along intermediate framing members for 3/8-inch (9.5 mm) and 7/16-inch (II mm) panels installed on studs spaced 24 inches (610 mm) on center and 12 inches (305 mm) on center for other conditions and panel thicknesses. These values are for short-time loads due to wind or earthquake and must be reduced 25 percent for normal loading. Allowable shear values for nails in framing members of other species set forth in Table 23-111-FF of Division III shall be calculated for all other grades by multiplying j the shear capacities for nails in Structural I by the following factors: 0.82 for species with specific gravity greater than or equal to 0.42 but less than 0.49, and 0.65 for a species with a specific gravity less than 0.42.. , . . Z 2Where panels are applied on both faces of a wall and nail spacing is less than 6 inches (152 mm) on center on either side, panel joints shall be offset to fall on different framing C) me be or framing shall be 3 Inch (76 mm) nominal or thicker and nails on each side shall be staggered C) i 3Fr at adjoining panel edges shall be 3-inch (76 mm) nominal or wider and nails shall be staggered where nails are spaced 2 inches (51 mm) on center. - g 1711 4The values for 3/8-inch (9.5 mm) and 7/16-inch (11 mm) panels applied direct to framing may be increased to values sh'o'wn for '5/32-inch (12 mm) panels, provided studs are spaced a maximum of 16 inches (406 mm) on center or panels are applied with long dimension across studs. 5Framirtg at adjoining panel edges shall be 3-inch (76 mm) nominal or wider and nails shall be staggered where lOd nails having penetration into framing of more than I/8 c inches (41 mm) are spaced 3 inches (76 mm) or less on center. -n - .0 w 0 - . . . -,, z, C) C) 0. a. m ;• • DASSE DESIGN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC. I -11 IRVINE PROJECT 9"~'P 13 X PAGE BY - M'0R - DATE • • CKD BY - - - - DATE --e-', afJicJLAe.. ' V1ALL- c:d1--l' - LA Di 9 1 , - kiP - (ArLIe 10 r4ACN\ o " • • '-• •• . ( -' U • - C-f-AL-- 2r . t C,7('4(s - :, r Fe 'r- • :. • DASSE DESIGN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC. Ltc1 11 IRVINE PROJECT 12 ° L 1 PAGE BY w • CKDBY ------ -DATE ud Li 'SLi3- Li ( 4, a—, c, c 'r It CJ It ( •• V7I rpi Fo- F1 \\ RISA-'2D' (R)Version 3.03 DASSE / Design , , inc. Job F 15 Page Date_______ FRAME 2 .5, SCHUMACHER BLDG. 1979 '• . ' FILENAM:FRAM25+.R2, M. POWER '•, ., . , Units Option : US Standard AISC Code Checks : 9th Edition ASD Shear Deformation: NO P-Delta E'ffects : NO Redesign ' Yes S .. Edge Forces :' No A.S.I.F. : 1.333 Node :. . 'Boundary Conditions . . No X-Coord ' Y-Coord X-d'of Y-dof " •Rotation.:,' 'Temp. --------------(ft) --------(ft) ---- (in,K/in) ---- (in,K/in) --- (r,K-ft/r) -----(F)- 1 0.00 ' 0.00 ' R . R ' ' 0.00. 2 0.00 11.63 •• , , 0.00 . . 3 ' '.7 .33 ii'. 63 0.00 4. , 14.66 11.63 ' . 0.00 .5 14.66 000 R ' R , ' ' , 0.00 , Material : Elastic . Poisson's Thermal Weight Yield Stress Label Modulus Ratio . Coefficient ,Density, (Fy) ------- - --------- (Ksi) ------ -(F) -------- (K/ft3) -------(Ksi) STL.. 29000.00 0.30000 0..6000 0.490 •. 36.000 Section ' Database ' Matl." Area ' • Moment of As •. y/y Label . Shape • Set •• . ' Inertia Coef ---------------- • - - - -- - - - - - - -. (in2) -------- -. - (inA4) -.- - - . COL • • • W10X15 • STL. • 4.41 5 • 2.890 1.20 1' BEAM Wl0X15 . ' STL. . 4.41 68.900 1.20 'BRACE TU3.5X3.,5X4 STL. :. 3.09 . . 5.290 1.20 --------------------------------------------------------------- I J • ' . I Releases J ': • End Offsets No Node Node Section x .y, z x y z 'Sec Sway • I J Length, - ------------------------------------------------ ----------- (in) ----(in) -------.(ft) 1 1 - 2 COL' • . ' ' Y • S 11.63 2 5 - 4 COL • ' S • • ' 11.63 32- 3 BEAM •. '1 • S • 733 . 4 3 - •' 4, BEAM • •, 1 • • • : ',. • , 7.33 5 1 '- • 3 BRACE' • ' 1 •l , • S • • • • 13.75 6 3 -' 5 ' BRACE '1. . 1 '. S • ' ' S ' 13 . 75 DASSE DESIGN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC. I7 hT IRVINE PROJECT PAGE BY - - DATE i/ W CKDBY ---------DATE L, 2. I-AC - (1 L TxCax'/b A 4 o ( - - 12-7 A II -' • , / • I - s.4-.7+ •: 2(111 ) CA - LV)c #, IIWAI . I . E . SUPER I M POSED LOADS(Lbs./Sq. Ft.), DIAPHRAGM SHEAR VALUES (q) (Lbs./L.F.) AND FLEXIBILITY FACTORS.(F) CDAKI NUMBER r & CONCRETE 7'-0" 7'-6 8..001 860 1 9'-0 9'-6" 10'-0" 1O60 110 11'-6" 12-0 WT.psf PS 1 255 227 176 156 140 125 113 102 92 83 76 22 2 255 227 204 185 140 125 113 102 92 83 76 3 255 227 204 185 168 125 113 102 92 83 76 q 1450 1420 1400 1370 1350 1330 1320 1300 1290 1280 1270 1.8 F .57 .58 .59 .60 .61 1 .62 .62 .63 .64 .65 .65 1 286 255 229 178 160 143 129 117 106 97 88 21 2 286 255 229 207 188 172 129 117 106 97 88 3 286 255 229 207 188 172 150 117 106 97 88 q 1480 1450 1420 1390 1370 1350 1330 1310 1300 1280 1270 2 F .53 .54 .55 .56 .57 .58 .59 .60 .60 .61 .62 1 317 282 254 229 180 162 146 133 117 103 90 20 2 317 282 254 229 208 182 156 133 117 103 90 3 317 282 254 229 208 182 156 135 117 103 90 4 2 1 . q 1510 1470 1440 1410 1390 1370 1350 1330 1310 1300 1290 F .50 .51 .52 .53 .54 .55 .56 .57 .57 .58 .58 1 380 339 305 272 229 194 167 144 125 110 97 27.5 19 2 380 339 305 272 229 194 167 144 125 110 97 3 380 339 305 272 229 194 167 144 125 110 97 24 q 1580 1540 1500 1470 1440 1410 1390 1370 1 1350 1330 1310 F .44 .45 .46 .47 .48 .49 .50 .51 .52 .53 .53 1 400 388 342 285 240 204 175 151 1 131 115 101 18 2 400 388 342 285 240 204 175 151 I 131 115 101 3 400 . 388 342 285 240 204 175 151 131 115 101 2.7 q 1630 1590 1550 1510 1480 1450 1420 1400 1380 1360 1340 F .40 .42 .43 .44 .44 .45 .46 .47 .48 .49 .49 1 400 388 348 308 267 226 194 168 146 128 113 16 2 400 388 348 308 267 226 194 168 146 128 113 3 400 388 348 308 267 226 194 168 146 128 113 33 . q 1780 1720 1670 1630 1590 1550 1520 1490 1460 1430 1410 F .33 .34 .35 .36 .37 .38 .39 .40 .40 . .41 .42 I \'V2 FORMLOK LIGHT WEIGHT CONCRETE (110 pcf) GALVANIZED OR PHOSPHATIZED / PAINTED -- r-" TOTAL L-__. • ___________ 0 • . . . SLLA AB EP .DTH 2Lr J f •4 WELDS F- L • 1 288 225 198 176 157 141 127 114 1 103 94 85 22 2 288 257 231 208 157 141 127 114 1 103 94 85 3 288 257 281 208 190 141 127 114 1 103 94 85 1.8 q 1610 1580 .1550 1530 1510 1490 1480 1460 1450 1430 1420 F .51 .52 .53 .54 .54 .55 .56 .57 .57 .58 .58 1 322 287 226 201 180 .161 146 132 119 109 99 . 21 2 322 287 258 233 212 161. 146 132 119 109 99 3 322 287 258 233 212 194 146 132 119 109 99 2.0 q 1640 1610 1580 1550 1530 1510 1490 1470 1460 1440 1430 J f•________ F .48 .49 .50 .51 .51 .52 .53 .54 .54 .55 .55 41 /2 1 357 318 286 258 202 182 165 149 136 124 113 20 2 357 318 286 258 235 215 165 149 136 124 113 32.1 3 357 318 286 258 235 215 197 180 136 124 113 2.1 q 1670 1630 1600 1570 1550 1530 1510 1490 1470 1450 1440 F .45 .46 .47 .48 .48 .49 .50 .51 .51 .52 . .52 19 1 400 382 . 343 310 282 236 204 185 169 152 I 134 2 400 382 343 310 282 257 231 200 169 152 134 1 HOUR 3 400 382 343 310 282 257 231 200 173 152 134 FIRE 2.4 q 1730 1690 1650. 1620 1590 1560 1540 1520 1500 1480 1470 D F .40 .41 .42 .43 .44 .45 .45 .46 .46 .47 .47 RATING flMIII 1 48 I 400 400 391 354 322 279 235 210 182 160 140 2 400 400 391 354 322 283 243 210 182 160 140 3 400 400 391 1 354 322 283 . 243 210 182 160 140 g 1790 1740 1700 1660 2.7 1630 1600 1580 1560 1540 1520 1500 F .37 .38 .39 .40 .40 .41 .42 .43 .43 1 .44 .44 16 1 1 400 400 390 352 320 293 269 232 202 177 .155 . 2 400 400 390 352 320 293 269 232 202 177 155 3 400 400 390 352 320 293 269 232 202 177 155 3.3 .q 1940 1880 1830 1780 1740 1700 1670 1640 1620 1590 1570 F 1 .30 1 .31 .32 .33 .34 .35 .35 .36 .36 . .37 .37 Shoring required in shaded areas. 12 - VERCO I Line 1 , V " Title :SCHtACHER BLDG 1979 .. .' V Line 2. ' Scope :2nd Floor Addition . . Line V 3 . Number:95B1013'-X1 V V ne 4 . V Misc .: e ' V. . 'Psng :M.,Power ..Date:-11 5- -Jan'-96 STEEL BEAM DESIGN &PNALYSIS V Page f2j DESCRIPTION ::: ADON 7 /9Co - -BRAN DATA -------------, ----------- V MEMBER DATA V. AISCSECTION [FBI [S]>>W14x34 V 36 ksi V V VV •, V ' V CENTER SPAN LENGTH = . 23.08 ft . LOAD DURATION FACTOR = 1.00 V V V V V V LEFT ' V. = ft MINOR AXIS . V N y/n RIGHT V = . ft . Graphics: (1,2,3,4) : V 3 V V UNBRACED LENGTH V . = 2 ft - . ---------END CONDITIONS ------------V V INCLUDE BEAN WT,''? N . V y/n FIXITY CODE ----->> 1 V V V V V INCLUDE LL W/ ST. ? N y/n. 1:P/P,2:F/F;3:F/P,4:P/P,5:F/Pree V V - --------------------- ------ -APPLIED LOADS-7-7 --->> All distances refer to left support, use '-' for left cantilever POINT .....*1 .....*2 .....#3.. ..#4.. ..#S.. . .#6 ....*7.. Dead = 3.27 . 3.07 :. V V V k . .•. V V ,VV ,• V • • Live 8.16 7.67 Short= V VVV V VV • V V V k V V V V V D.15t.= 8.42 15.75 . V ft V V V V . DISTRIBUTED V Dead V V V V V V klf. V Live=-. V V . kif V V V Short= V V V . .klf V V V ..• X Lft= ft V XRt= MOMENTS .....V V V V V V V V V V Dead = V k-ft V V V Live = V V V V V V V k-ft V V Short= V . .: . V k-ft Dist. V V V V V V V V ft TRAPEZOIDAL.... Dead -Live' Short Location V V Load @ Left = . . klf X Left = . ft . . . * Right= V V klf X Right V = . ft - Load ® Left'= klf VV X Left = V ft V V V V V . klf , X Right ' .ft •VV V• V V V IV -----------------------------.- SUMMARY -------------- ------------------- V V V V V USE : W14X34, Max Stress Ratio = 0.93, Max Defi Ratio = 322.263 V , V V Max Values... Actual. .Allow.. fb / Pb : max = 0.93 ok , V. Moment = 89.8 96.3 k-ft fyi Fv : % max = 0.200K V V .. . . Stress = 22.15 23.76 ksi , 'Max. DL Defl Ratio = 1127 V , I Shear, =. 11.5 574 k .• Max. -TL Defi Ratio ,= 322 ......Stress . 2.89, . 14.40 ksi V Deflection =, -0.859 in V V V V V . VI Dead Load + Skip Loadings I TABULAR SUMMARY OF Placed DL I LL LL+ST LL . LL+STI I V V V LOAD COMBINATIONS.. .for Max Only I@Cntr ®Cntr @Cants ®Cantsl I V V V , , VVV V V -----------------I-------------I IMoments. .M+ @ Center = 89.8 25.7. . , k-ftl V • I V V M- @Center = ' ' 0.0 -0.0 'V. , V k-ftl V . .. B Left k-ft V Right = , V V V V k-ft Shears.. :5 Left V = 10.7 10. 7' • V kips ' • ' V Line 5 l . Title :SCHIACHER BLDG 1979 Line 2 Scope 2nd Floor Addition Line 3 .,: . Number:95B1013-X1 nè4 ... .. Misc. : . ,, S e 5 .. Dsngr':M. Power . Date:li-Jan-.96 STEEL BEAM DESIGN & ANALYSIS @ Right = 11'.5 3.3 11.S kipsl in IDefi .....@ Center = -0.86 -0.25 -0.86 -0.25 I. BLeft = . . . in I . 6' Right = . in I® ft = -, . S in 'IReaction.@ Left = 10.7 3.1 10.7 -3.11 kips 6' Right . = 41:5 3.3 11.5 3.3 , S kipe. STEEL SECTION DATA - ---. . DEPTH = 13.98 in. . lxx .= 340 ,iñ4 '- WEB THICKNESS = 0.285 in iyy =23.299 in4 FLANGE WIDTH - -= 6.745 in .- Sxx . ' =48.640 -in 3' FLANGE THICKNESS = 01.455 in.: Syy =. 6.91 in3 S S SECTION AREA ..10. 0,0 in2. rxx . . = 5.831 in S SECTION WEIGHT = j3L.95 #/ft ryy. = 1.526 in S • rT =1.0 •. NOTES FROM ALLOWABLE STRESS DETERMINATION F'b ': 'Allowable • , = 23.76 ksi . . . Fa calc'd per 1.5_1, K*L/r.< Cc S . .I Beam Passes 1.5.1.4.l, Para 1,'2; 4, &5, Fb=0.66L7y S 5 DASSE DESIGN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC. IRVINE PROJECT_1bXJ PAGE j • BY. DATE W 2.— L.4Z Acc1vi CKDBY — -- — --_.DATE 171.7 /• r Lc\ _,4s - — H • . •• l• S/R b I 1-, i -: '/• ' • €'f •• • • •. • . r4_ _ -, Hlc4(' u • - • I o J i : ________ — •l i+ J 12 0, 33( > • C. I o A • Line 1.. . ' Title :SCHUMACHER BLDG 1979 Line 2 :S ' .Sdope :2nd Floor Addition Line 3 •S . 'Number:95B1013-X1 Tne 4Misc' . 5 . .. S Dsngr :M: Power Date:11-Jan-96 AISC BASE PLATE DESIGN Page DESCRIPTION/S >> VERTICAL BRACE FRAME CE 2 5 1 /1 - /i c >>D.1&E.1.' S S DESIGN DATA --------- ------------- ------------------- --------- ------ ----. • AXIALLOAD . kips 83.98 X-XAXIS.MOMENT ft-k . .. . S AISC SECTION NAME ---->>IW10X22 None None None None - S TENSION CAPACITY/BOLT kl 24.5 . •. . . 0 * BOLTS PER SIDE •' BOLT AREA in ' 1.227. •, ' , . .. 'S - - .•. DIET. FROM PL EDGE inj , 2.5 • . BASEPLATE HEIGHT ml . WIDTH ' : ml 22 . SUPPORT PIER HEIGHT ].nl 144 WIDTH ml 144 f'c psil 3,000 3,000 0, 3,000 3,060 3,000 ,• ksil 36 36 26' 36 36 . . • .IAD DCRATION FACTOR 100 . 1.00 1.00, 1.00 1.00 AISC SECTION DEPTH . in I S . FLANGE WIDTH . in -FLANGE THICKNESS ml ' . , . . . , " •. , S WEB THICKNESS ml -------- PLATE DESIGN --------- -- - - - - - - --- - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- - - - - ----- - - - - - - -- - -- MIN. REQ'D THICKNESS ml Plate Analysis Type - ,. • . , 3,. Anchor Bolt Tension ki . ...(per bolt) . ' .: ' . . . - . . S - Actual Bearing ' psil 212 Allowable: Per ACI 10.151 3,570 -- ' . ' . • . S -. Per AISC l.5.S 2,100. , -' . • , .5 •• . Max. Plate'Capacity for I Allowabie'Bearing ki . 831.6. - . . . ...... • PLATE ANALYSIS ---->>>'Use If Actual Thickness Varies From Min. ACTUAL PLATE THICKNESS in • "Max. All Plate Pb ksil 2700 . ' , ' - - - ' . . ' • -, Actualfb - . kail - NA • 0 5 • . . ,-.-------------------------N------------------'- -S S ' (LT. • -7:7 / (4.' ,/.i M: • (s) / (fl "XV 1.1 • C3 40, / (s ( '' / ( 41 / (3 Mi / (• (_) I7_/ (• / .77 (c / . (&) . (s' DASSE DESIGN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC. IRVINE L-t&1 Ic1i PROJECT PAGE PAGE - I BY - gj4_ DATE 2 a-a-s Vi CKD BY - - - DATE - - - - - • . DASSE DESIGN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC. ti PROJECT _91J_ IRVINE PAGE - Z- pLc. BY - - DATE CKDBY DATE Arc7 ,x : ••• : , L. LL,K LL 1 1: tL45 I4,1 2. 12. IO 42 4 17. i 19 27 '2- 2/ M • I •i 4 - • S • • 4 & 21 Z-i ,(p S4 t 1 • rP,CP)CAL. . . . iTh. iLe- A -r c-LJ L,/ • - r- eAr1:- c-LuiJ . • Fi . -• DASSE DESIGN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC. LP& IRVINE PROJECT 3 ,h PAGE r By DATE ----------DATE CKD BY - - - - - A; CL 0 Lo IO 2 A U 4 .L . (4,9 3 0 .1' 0 0 00 0 k1 P I- 1(0 - Lv i,Ji L tLir AxtL TJ'J ) a - ' c:( I y S x I -73 cc- ', - f TO kp -.\- x -k -;- (Nil 13 - - - DASSE DESIGN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC. IRVINE PROJECT_ L3 PAGE - BY - DATE L7'I CKDBY ------DATE - ,. . 0 _Geotechnics I ncorpor I ated Principals- Antho4 F. BeLfast Michael P Imbrigito W Lee Vanderhurst January 15, 1996 Schumacher . . - . . .. . . JOb No. 0272-001-00 . 1969 Palomar Oaks Way . . . Doc. #6-0032. Carlsbad, California 92009 Attention Mr. Tod Helseth SUBJECT LIQUEFACTION POTENTIAL Additions to Schumacher Facility 1969/1979 Palomar Oaks Way Carlsbad, California REFERENCE: . Geotechnical Investigation, Additions to Schumacher Facility, 1969/1979 Palomar . .Oaks Way, Carlsbad, California, Geotechnics Incorporated, Project No. 0272-001-00, December 4, 1995. , . •. Gentlemen: We are preparing this letter in response to a request by Mr. Philip Pape of McGraw/Baldwin Architects, who in turn is responding to review comments by the City of Carlsbad. Our referenced geotechnical investigation identifies the alluvial soil underlying the site as being potentially liquefiable during a maximum credible earthquake on the Rose Canyon Fault. This letter provides our opinion-as to potential hazards associated with such an event. The potential for liquefaction affects not only the Schumacher buildings, but many, others along Palomar Oaks Way which are underlain by alluvial soils associated with the Encinas Creek drainage The soils which are potentially liquefiable at the subject site consist sandy soils below the water table and are about 10 to 15 feet inthickness. This layer is covered by about 12 to 20 feet of non-liquefiable soil consisting of compacted fill and unsaturated alluvium. It. is our. opinion that the effects of liquefaction at the site will likely be broad settlement of the alluvial valley. .The effects on: the structure will likely consist 'of cosmetic cracking of interior walls and slabs Loss of foundation support and resulting catastrophic settlement is not considered likely. These opinions are based on the following .. ,. . . , . . .. P.O. Box 26500-224 • . San DiegoCalifornia • .92196 '0' • Phone (619) 536-1000 • Fax (619) 536-8311 0• ... 0 •, ' • ,,.. . '•O 1 01 Geotechnics Incorporated Principals Anthony F. Belfast * Michael P ImbrigIio - • : W. Le'e.Vanderhurst December 15 1995 Schumacher Project No': 0272-001.00 1969 Palomar Oaks Way: • -'. : , Doc. #5-0631 Carlsbad, CA 92009 "•, •. ' 0 - SUBJECT: FOUNDATION PLAN REVIEW Additions to Schumachet, Facility , 1979 Palomar Oaks Way, Carlsbad; California PLAN CHECK NO.: 95-1636 REFERENCES: Construction Plans for -Schumacher. 1979 Palomar Oaks Way, McGraw/Baldwin Architects, Sheets S1.0, 'S2.1, S2.2, and 'S2.3 (DASSE Design of Southern Califoinia) ., Geotechnical Investigation, Additiohs to Schumacher Facility, 1969/1979 Palomar Oaks Way, Carlsbad, California, Geotechnics Incorporated, Project No. 0272-001-00, December 4, 1995. Gentlemen:- We have reviewed the geotechnical aspects of the referenced foundation plans for the additions • at 1979 Palomar Oaks Way., it is our professional opinion that the plans adequately incorporate the recommendations of the project geotechnical'report. ' ' Please call at your convenience if you should have any questions regarding this correspondene. We appreciate this opportunity to be of continued service FF GEOTECHNICS INCORPORATED : - NIX .CO4O333 op C Anthony F Belfast P E 40333 Principal .- - P.0.-Box 26500-224 • Sn Diego California 's 92196 ' • • - . Phone (619) 536-1000. Fax (619) 536-8311 • ' ___________________ Geotechnics -_Incorporated Principals I Anthony F Belfast Michael P Imbnglio W Lee Vanderhurst I.:.H .. .:. . •:'. .. I GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION .. . . . ADDITIONS TO SCHUMCHER FACILITY I 1969/1979 PALOMAR, OAKS 'WAY . . . . . ... . CARLSBAD, C'ALIFORNIA . .. . .. .. I I I .. .. . . . . . I . . . . Prepared for .,. Schumaher . . . 1969 Palomar Oaks Way . . Carlsbad, California 92009 . .. . '. . . .. . I I I.'. . . . . . ... . by; . . . . I GEOTECHNICS INCORPORATED Project No. 0272-001-00 Doc.. #5-0570 . : .'• .1. . .... . . . .. . . "• ' December 4," 1995 ' . . . .. . . . P.O. Box 26500-224 .• San1 Diego'Californià' • 92196 . .. . . Phone (619) 536-1000 • Fax (619) 536-8311 I ,I 0 . GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION . ADDITIONS TO SCHUMACHER FACILITY . 1969/1979 PALOMAR OAKS WAY . CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA I TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION......... . . .. . . . : ...................1 I . . . 1.1 Authorization .................................................. . 1 . : .. 1.2 Scope of Services.......... .. ............................. 10 . 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION ........................................................2 30 SITE HISTORY 3 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 3 I 40 50 EXISTING DISTRESS 4 I . 5.1 Floor Level Survey . ....... .......... ................. .. . 4 5.2.. 1969 Palomar Oaks Way ................................................4 1,979 PalomarOaks Way. . . . .. ................. 1.. . . ' ............. 6.0 GEOLOGY AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS .. ................. . ..... . .6.1 Fill . ..................................................... S . I 6.2 Alluvium .................................................................5 .... .6.3 Santiago Formation ..............................6 6.4 Groundwater .................................................... . : 6 .7.0 GEOLOGIC HAZARDS AND SEISMICITY ............ ................. •0 7 .. 7.1 Geologic Hazards ............................. .• .... ., 7 . 7.2 Seismicity .................. .7 I . 7.3 Liquefaction ............................................................ 7.4 Settlement .......................................................8 . 7 ..I . 8.0 CONCLUSIONS........................................ ..: .................... .. 8.1 Liquefaction . . . . .. . ........................... . ................. . .8.2 Settlement ................................................. .. . . .. . . 9 . I . . 9.0 RECOMMENDATIONS...... .... .. ,.........................................10 .I 9.1.. Building 1969 , ...... ....10 9.1.1 Foundation Design ..........................................10 91.2 Interior Concrete On-Grade Slabs ................................... 11 1 . . . . . 0 .. ,. .. .. Geoteclitiics. II1cOrI)orat(I 0 I • Schumacher Project No 0272 001-00 • December 4 1995 Doc #5_0570 Page 3 92 Building 1979 11 9.2.1 Foundation Design 12 I 9 2 2 Interior Concrete On-Grade Slabs 12 9.3 General Construction 12 I..9.3.1 Plan Review 12 9.3.2. Site Preparation 13 9.3.3 Excavation Observation 13 I 0.14 4 Fill Compaction 14 .9.3.5* Site Drainage 14 I 9.3.6 Moisture Protection for Slabs 15 9.3.7 Exterior Slabs 15 91.3.8 Expansive Soils 16 9 3 9 Reactive Soils 16 9 3 10 Earth Retaining Structures 16 I 100 LIMITATIONS OF INVESTIGATION 17 I APPENDICES REFERENCES Appendix A I SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LABORATORY TESTING Appendix B Appendix C 1: I .1. I Ceotechuiics Incoi 1)01 lte(I I I ':. '• ': •.'' ': GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION ADDITIONS TO SCHUMACHER FACILITY 1969/1979 PALO MAR OAKS WAY CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA '. 1.. ':' ' ': ., '•. I 1.0 INTRODUCTION I The following report presents the findings conclusions and recommendations for our investigation of the site of the planned additiohs to, the Schumacher Facility. The site presently' contains two I commercial structures one of which has experienced distress The purpose of our investigation was to evaluate the existing geotechnical conditions at the site as they relate to the proposed I improvements, and to make recommendations regarding the geotechnical aspects of design The recommendations contained herein are based on a surface reconnaissance subsurface exploration, laboratory testing and professional experience in the general site area.,Design 1 values may include presumptive parameters based on professional judgement I I Authorization This investigation was conducted in accordance with the authorization of Schumacher, by their Purchase Order No P56372 dated October 20 1995 The scope of services is consistent with those outlined in our Proposal No 5-148, dated October 19 1995 1.2 Scope of Services'' The following tasks were completed to produce this report I 1.2.1. A visual reconnaissance of the surface characteristics of the site and review of pertinent literature related to the general geologic conditions The As-Graded geotechriical'documents Were not' available from the City of Carlsbad. 1 2.2 A limited floor-level (manometer) survey of the western portion of the slab I in Building 1969 1 2.3 A subsurface exploration consisting of the drilling of three bonngs using a truck mounted, eight-inch diameter hollow stem flight auger.,,Bulk, disturbed, relatively undisturbed, and undisturbed soil samples were, cplle'cted during logging ' Ceotechuiics Incorporated I I Schumacher . Project No. 0272-001-00 I December 4, 1995. . . ,.. . . . Doc. #5-O510 Page2 of the borings. An additional boring was drilled inside the structure using a hand auger. . :. I .1.2.4 Laboratory testing of selected, samples collected in the field in order to evaluate the pertinent physical.characteristics'of the soils which may influence site ' I . development and rêmediation. . .. . 1 1.2.5 Engineering analysis of field and. laboratory data in order to develop I . alternative recommendations for site preparation, remedial earthwork, and new foundation design. . . . . . . . . . .1 . . 1.2.6 Assessment of general seismic conditions and geologic hazards affecting the area, such as seismicity, liquefactions potential, and groundwater or seepage. 1.2.7 Preparation of this, report. . . . . . I. .. . . . . . . 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION . . The subject site includes commercial structures. The structures are located at 1969 and 1979 I . Palomar Oaks Road as shown on the Site Location Map, Figure 1. Building 1969 is approximately 54,000 square feet, and Building 1979 is approximately .17,000 square feet ' . Palomar Oaks Road borders the site along the north. Additional commercial structures and parking border to.site to the east of Building 1979. A large westerly-trending'drainage course, called Encinas Creek, flows along the southern border of the site. South of Encinas Creek is an', I .approximately 160 fOOt high, moderately steep ascending natural slope. The site is bordered on the west by. Paseo Del Lago. The layout of the site is shown schematically on the Site Plan, Figure 2. Various improvements have been constructed onsite in association with Encinas Creek. Encinas I . creek has been channelized and lined with concrete along most of the southern edge of the site. Between Paseo del Lago and Building 1969 is,a roughly triangular detention basin which .is I. . approximately 200 feet in length and a 180 feet in width. The north and east sides of the detention. basin, have been graded to 6:1'(horizontal:vertical) slopes. . Encinas Creek draihs into ' the detention basin near the southwest corner of Building .1969 though a riprap.waterfall, and out 'I • of the site through a box culvert at the western edge of the pond. ' An ogee spillway regulates the. Geoteclinics Incorporated ''' . — — — — — — — — — — — — — — mom — — — CARLSBAD r~l t K AWN BLDG CORTE 41 RIGHT PL \ \\\ bV- / CLOVER CT LN GUA k / . 21 \ FUCHSIA SWEETBRIAR CIR \ \ R4rç -- SiT E HE~rj()NDA '- .1 22 I -\ C' LAS — — \ - \ \ - \ ' \\ \ .. TO D . c. 05 . mTO A - - 650?'OT ONUP CLOVER WIN A SOUTH 5?VQ VERDE 3 BOXWOOD CT- CAI!NO DE LAS ONDAS pc4j V LAURELW050 ST - _....- — —5\ç RD -"-tLL'Lu I — I STATE BEACH \' 29 r4 :T FS PAV ;PtA5 DAISY 28 pQXG VW(' '\ (VJ 7 FT 14 Kilometers SITE LOCATION MAP _Geotechnics . 196911979 Palomar Oaks Way Incorporated . Schumacher Building ADAPTED FROM THE 1995 THOMAS BROTHERS GUIDE PROJECT NO. 0272-001-00 DOCUMENT NO. 5-0570 FIGURE 1 4 U tv I ' V V •:. . V V Schumacher V . ., . V . Project No. 0272-001-00 December 4-,.1995 . . . V . Doc. #5-0570 Page I V detention basin to a maximum water surface elevation of approximately 151 or roughly ten feet I below the pad elevation of building 1969 During our site visit the water surface elevation in V V Encinas Creek was above the, edge of the concrete lining, approximately 12 feet below the I parking lot elevation near Building 1979 and the detention basin had been drained for maintenance I The descending slopes which surround the detention basin are 1andsc,aped with irrigated lawns, as well as numerous trees and shrubs The south slope appears to still contain natural I vegetation which becomes very dense along Encinas Creek Drainage on site was originally directed by sheet flow to the southeast at a two percent gradient A variety of roof and storm drains have subsequently been constructed which now direct runoff to Encinas Creek. ' 30 SITE HISTORY Based on'our document review, the subject site appears to have, undergone several phases of V development. Both aerial photographs (taken in 1953) and San Diego County topographic maps indicate that prior to development the entire site was at one point used as .a stock pond I Encinas Creek was blocked with what appears to have been an earthen dam some time prior to 1953 Paseo del Lago appears to have been constructed over the location of the original earthen V I . dam. The site was graded in the early 1980's by Bircher Construction'. Buildings 1969 and 1979 were constructed at about this time. In 1987,'additions were constructed on the south and west V ' ' sides of Building 1969,. resulting in a structure roughly three times the original area. . V 4.0' PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Two additions are proposed for the subject site It is our understanding that approximately 1,200 I square feet of additional one story office space is planned in the northwest corner of Building 1969 A new stairway and elevator is planned in the area of the proposed addition In addition, I ... ' approximately 1,650 square feet.of one story warehouse space is planned for the southeast corner of Building 1979 Details of the proposed additions were not available at the time at which this investigation was conducted I I Geoteclitucs I I . Schumacher . . . . S . Project No. 0272-001-00 December 4, 1995 . ' .5... . . . . . Doc. #5-0570 . . . . . . . . . . . . Page I 5.0 EXISTING DISTRESS Limited distress evaluations were conducted at the subject site on November 4 15 and 16, 1995 A floor level survey of the western portions of Building 11969 was conducted on November 4, 1995, using a manometer 5.1 Floor Level Survey.. : . .' . . .. •. .'.. S . . . The results of the manometer survey are presented in FigUre 3, Floor'Level Survey. The .. . . ' survey encompassed betweeri,100 and 130 feet of Building 1969 as measured from the. western edge of the structure, and approximately 205 feet of the structure as measured 1 ' from the southern edge. The maximum elevation difference observed was approximately 4 inches between Rooms 307 and 104 Substantial differential settlement also occurred I in the north-south direction with a maximum elevation difference of about 2.5 inches between the north and south walls . 5.2 1969 Palomar Oaks Way I Considerable distress was observed in and around the 1969 Palomar Oaks Way structure The most noticeable feature consists of an approximately one-quarter to one-half inch wide separation of the crack control joint which trends north to south, approximately 20 I feet from the western edge of the structure This separation has resulted in considerable distress to the tile in that part of the structure Observations made on the crack control I joint itself suggest perhaps one-quarter of an inch differential settlement across the joint Hairline cracks were common in most areas of the concrete slab-on-grade We I understand that several areas of the slab were leveled with a concrete topping to reduce the elevation differences Column settlement was also observed at a number of locations .......... . S. throughout. the site with a rnaximum differential between the column'pad and the adjacent slab of about %-inch In addition door frame distortion indicated substantial differential movement throughout the survey area It is our understanding that the doors had to be I realigned in order to remain functional f .5 5•. . . . . u: . .: . .... S •. Ceotecliiiics Incoi 1)01 ated I 17 'E 0 00 i_i I - .160 1 al L5 V_ Oil 0 V II 00 V b LiPli ii i / Cal I i __ j VTh rTH ° IJLTjUJ I. L7ll J1fL . VT L. VV , --- ±- ______ • V •• :1 I VV • SCALE: V CONTOUR INTERVAL: 0.25 INCHES • V 0 10 20 40 V • V V V V FLOOR LEVEL SURVEY PROJECT NO. 0272-001-00 Geotechnics V 1969 Palomar Oaks Way DOCUMENT NO. 5-0570. Incorporated SchumacherBuulding FIGURE 3 I Schumacher Project No: 0272-001-00 : December 41995 .. . -. Doc. #5-0570 Page 51 I 5.3 1979 Palomar Oaks Way In general the 1979 Palomar Oaks Way structure appears to be in fairly good condition I as no significant distress was observed There was some minor cracking of the concrete slab-on-grade and the exterior. 6.0., GEOLOGY AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS I Our subsurface investigation indicates that the site is underlain by variable depths of compacted fill which was placed over native alluvium which is in turn underlain by the Santiago Formation I Borings were advanced to a maximum depth of 38 feet below existing grade The approximate locations of the borings are shown on the Site Plan Figure 2 Logs describing the subsurface I conditions encountered are given in the figures of Appendix B A description of the sLibsurface conditions and the specific units observed during drilling follows A schematic cross section (A- A'), showing the estimated depths of fill and alluvium across the valley is shown in Figure 4 The I location of cross section A-A' is shown on the Site Plan Figure 2 I 61 Fill Compacted fill materials on site appear to have been generated from Santiago Formation sandstone material Compacted fill materials as observed on site typically consists of a clayey fine to medium grained sand (Unified Soil Classification SC) Fill materials were I generally light yellow-brown to olive-brown moist and medium dense Standard penetration -blow.counts in the fill indicated that the material was reasonably. well I compacted..Fill materials contained small intact sandstone chunks Fill was observed in all of the borings with a maximum observed depth of 141/2 feet Review of the available geologic documents indicates that both buildings are underlain by compacted fill material I with depths ranging from between 5 and 18 feet with the shallowest filL below Building 1979 and the deepest fill below Building 1969 6 2 Alluvium (Qal) I Alluvial soil was encountered on site immediately below the fill and above the Santiago Formation.. Alluvium was encountered in Borings B-i through B-3 to a maximum observed . depth of 351/2 feet below the surface The alluvium contained two distinct layers The top Geotechnits Incoi j) ova ted - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1969PalótharOàksWãy •-- I n c o r p o rate d Schumacher Building FIGURE .4': I . . . . . Schumacher . . S Project No. 0272-001-00 I December 4, 1995 . . Doc. #5-0570 Page 6 • 5 to 7 feet of the alluvium consisted of a black, clayey sand (SC) to sandy clay (CL) of I . medium plasticity. This material was generally moist, and mediUm dense or hard. This layer contained abundant plant debris, consistent with that found in topsoil. Based on these observations and our understanding of the site history, it is likely that these I materials are lacustrine sediments which are found at the surface of a lake, such as the . lake which originally occupied the entire site as discussed in Section 3.0. Beneath the .I lacustrine sediments1 the alluvium consists of a uniform, brown, fine to medium gräined: clayey to-silty sand (SC-SM), which ranges from low plasticity to nonpiastic. .The material . was typically loose to medium dense, and very wet to saturated. .I 6.3 Santiago Formation (isa) . . . The Santiago Formation, as. observed oh site, typically consists of fine to medium grained I clayey sandstone Formational material was typically gray with thin orange laminates dry to moist, and dense to very dense,. S I 6.4 Groundwater . . . . . . I .Groundwater was encountered in borings B1 and B-2 at 20 and 211/2 feet below existing grade; respectively and in boring B-3 at approximately 12 feet below existing grade. From . our investigation and a literature review, it appears that the phreatic surface resides I. . . approximately at elevation .150 in the eastern portion of the site and falls to. approximately elevatiOn 140 in the western portions. Note that the water level Observed in Borings B-i I and B-2 during our investigation is consistent with the bottom of the detention basin which would be expected since the detention basin was empty.duñng our site investigation, the U . • high degrees of saturation in the material above the groundwater table suggests that, the .water surface in the soil was at approximately elevation 150 when the detention basin was SI S filled. • • • S •• . . . • : •. • The groundwater appeared to be perched in the alluvial materials just above the contact I with the Santiago Formation. Groundwater levels may change in the future due to surface drainage, irrigation, seasonal rainfall, Or a combination of these factors. . S I S • S . . . S •• .1 • S • S • . S S. .S . . .S Geotechnics •Incorporated . . 55 • • . I I Schumacher . . . Project No. 0272-001-00 December 4, 1995. . . . Doc. #5-0570 Page 7 -. 7.0 GEOLOGIC HAZARDS AND SEISMICITY . . . . . . . 7.1 Geologic Hazards . . . .• . . .. I The subject site is not located within an area previously known for geologic hazards, including active faulting, nor was evidence of past soil failures or faulting noted in our I investigation. 7.2 Seismicity The subject site is located approximately 4.5 miles northeast of the off-shore trace of the I ' ....Rose -Canyon fault zone. The Rose Canyon fault zone has recently been upgraded to active status (I)MG, 1993). This fault is considered capable of generating a magnitude .I 64 earthquake (maximum probable event) (Wesnousky, 1986). The Rose Canyon fault. zone governs design considerations due to its.,active status and relative proximity to the . . site The estimated peak ground acceleration for the site is .therefore 0.44g. Design of structures should comply with the requirements of the governing jurisdictions, building codes and standard practices of the Associátiôn of. Structural Enineers of California. iquefaction I ...................iquefaction. is the phenomenon in which a soil layer looses most of its shear strength due. ' . . ,. to increased pore water pressure resulting from earthquake groundshaking. Liquefiable . soils are generally sandy, loose, and below the water table: Severe liquefaction can result in catastrophic damage to structures due to high degrees of differential settlement No indications, of past liquefaction failures were observed during, the site investigation. However, the in-situ state of alluvium at the site suggests that the potential foe liquefaction exists, given' the maximum probable earthquake in the ,Rose Canyon. Fault Zone as ' discussed above in Section 7 2 Liquefaction analysis was performed on an idealized site I .. profile using the technique presented by Seed and Idriss (1982).. The idealized profile is based on the results of laboratory tests and the approximate soil information found in Borings 13-.1 and B-2"'a'nd represents the. worse case condition.•. The results are I ' summarized in Figure 5. Note that the average shear stresses i'nduöed in the idealized profile due to the maximum probable event are plotted against the shear stress required.' I':. '...,"• .' . . Geotechuiics Incorporated I .1 . . . . .: Schumacher . Project No. 0272-001700 1 December 4, 1995 . Doc. #5-0570.. Page 8 to cause liquefaction. As indicated, the entire alluvium layer is potentially, liquefiable. Neither the Santiago Formation nor the fill was found to be potentially liquefiable: 7.4 Settlement I : The consolidation characteristics of the site soils was studied using engineering analysis . based on laboratory testing. The riesults, of the laboratory consolidation 'tests are presented in Figures C-7 through 0-12 in ,Appendix C. Our analysis indicates that the' fill soils are: not, likely to experience consolidation settlement due to the influence of foundation loads. The collapse potential of the fill was estimated by loading the fill up to approximately the in-situ stress, and-then saturating the sample as shown in Figures C-7. , and 0-8. In both collapse tests, the fill showed no potential for collapse. This indicates that the fill is not presently collapsible, and will not experience collapse settlement in thê I future when wetted However, there is no way to determine whether or not collapse settlement of the fill was in. part responsible for the observed settlement to 'date.'' Our analysis indicates that the alluvial soil is highly compressible. Figures 0-9 through ' C-12 present the results of the consolidation tests on the alluvium. Based on oUr analysis, .I. . we have drawn the following conclusions. Up to approximately 13 inches of total consolidation settlement has likely occurred to date at Building 1969. In addition, each time the 'water surface in the detention basin is -lowered, the phreatic surface in the alluvium underlying Building 1969 drops, resulting in increased effective stresses in the entire alluvium deposit. This has likely produced the episodic settlement which has been reported by Schumacher personnel. Settlement does not appear to be complete at this time. Additional, settlement of, approximately 3 to 4 inches may still occur at the west end , of Building 1969. One of the main causes of the observed settlement at Building 1969 is the increase in I . stress in the alluvium due to the surcharge of abOut 15 feet of fill. At Building 1979, only about 6 feet of, fill exists. ",For this reason, the potential for settlement is much lower. Based On our analysis, total settlement to date is approximately 1.5 to 2 inches, and less ' than one inch o. settlement' potential remains. Ceoteclinics Incorporated : , ' • ' ' ,., ' ' Schumacher 0 0 Project No. 0272-001-00 December 4, 1995 0 0 Doc; #5-0570 0 - , 0 .' . '- Page9 8.0 CONCLUSIONS The'lóose, saturated alluvium which exists below the site presents two geotechnicál constraints 0 which should be considered The alluvium is considered liquefiable and the alluvium has I remaining potential for settlement ' ' ' 0 0 0• 0 : ' 0 0 0 8.1 Liquefaction 0 Ouranalysis indicates that.the rnadrnum credible earthquake event on the Rose Canyon ' 0 Fault Zone is capable of inititing liquefaction in the sandy alluviUm that exists below the ' 0 compacted fill. The liquefaction hazard affects both Buildings 1979 and 1969. The . 0 effects of liquefaôtion often include severe settlement of structures foUnded on the liquefiable soil However, a mitigating condition at the site is the presence of about 5 to I 0 15feet of non-liquefiable compacted fill, and a cap of non-liquefiable clayey soil over the 'liquefiable sand. This, condition should help 'reduce the potential for bearing capacity ' 0 failure and settlement' associated with loss of ground due to large sand boils. In our •' ' , ' I opinion the likely result of liquefaction at the site would be broad settlement resulting in distress to floors and walls Compaction grouting of the liquefiable zone is probably the most common method of 'mitigating the liquefaction potential when existing structures are involved. Compaction I grouting is performed to den sify: the liquefiable zone and involves the injection of a stiff, concrete grout into the loose soil. 8.2 Settlement- Con tinue d, long-term settlenent appears to be a hazard at Building 1969,.p6 rti cularly at the west end where the fill.ovérburden is the greatest. Although compressible alluvium ' 0 also exists below Building 1979, the settlement potential is substantially less becaUse the depth of fill is about one-third of that under Building 1969.. It is our opinion that unless the alluvium is treated to reduce settlement Building 1969 and any additions to it will continue to settle, with up to -about 4 more inches possible. The construction of only the proposed additions on a deep foundation system is not recommended because unacceptable differential movement would likely occur between the two structures i.6., the existing building would continue to settle while the new addition CeotechiJics II1coII)olated Schumacher .• . S S ,. Project No. 0272-001-O0 :, :' December 4, 1995 5 ' . Doc. #5-0570 Page 10 S. S •: • . .S. . I would not. Construction of the hew additions on a stiffened fOundation, tied into the . S 'U .S. existing structure, is considered pactical Only if the continued movement and distress of -. the existing and new structures is cOnsidered acceptable. A comrhonly used method of. I . redUcing settlement : potential is densification by compaction grouting: As previously discussed this would also serve to mitigate liquefaction An alternative solution would be the use of 'mini-piles' or 'pin piles' to support the existing structure However, this would I . ' typically be.more expensive than compaction grouting. •. .. S .' S I.. '.' Although some risk of settlement exists at. Building 1979, it is substantially less than, at the west end of the site If risk of future cosmetic cracking is acceptable the new addition can be founded on a stiffened foundation tied to the existing structure It should be I recognized that the liquefaction hazard would remain 1.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 9.1. Building 1969 I The existing structure has experienced several inches of settlement which has been manifested as'cosmetic. distress: ,uneven floors and doors that needed to be realigned: I The addition of an additional 3 to 4 inches of settlement could however lead to more severe problem's. We therefore recommend that the !§ite be treated'to decrease future ' settlement to tolerable amounts The treated areas should include both the existing I • structure and the area of the proposed addition. It is .our opinion that compaction grouting S would adequately densify the alluvial soil Underpinning options are also available but I .. '. • this would typically involve structural alterations and would typiáally be more costly. Once remediation has been completed, the planned additibnt could be made using conventional . S construction methods' and shallow footings. Ideally the entire area of Building 1969 would. I • • be treated A specialty contractor should be .contacted to develop a remediation plan and cot estimate. • . .. . S S ' .5 , 5 9.1.1.. Foundation Design I . • • . . . . Provided ,that the underlying soil is treated to adequately decrease the settlement.. potential the following design parameters are recommended for foundation design for the proposed additions. ' ' ' . S •' , S. •'S I Ceotecliiiics lhc6r 1)01 ated I Schumacher . . . . . Project No. 0272-001-00 December 4, 1995 .. . .. . . Doc. #5-0570 Page 11...... I Allowable Soil Bearing: 2,000 psf. (allow a one-third increase for short-term I wind or seismic loads) Minimum Footing Width 12 inches Minimum Footing Depth 24 inches below lowest adjacent soil grade Minimum Reinforcement Two no 5 bars at both top and bottom in continuous I footings New foundations should be adequately doweIled into existing foundations, Where they I adjoin Lateral Resistance Lateral loads against structures may be resisted by friction between the bottoms of footings or slabs and I ... . . the supporting soil. A.coefficient of friction of 0.3 is . recommended. Alternatively, a passive pressure of 350 lbs/ft3 is recommended for the portion of vertical I foundation members embedded into compacted fill If friction and passive pressure are combined the . . . . . . passive presure' aIue should be educedby one- I third 9.1.2 Interior Concrete On-Grade Slabs • .• . • Slgbs should be designed for the anticipated loading. If an elastic design is used, I a modulus of subgrade reaction of 350 kips/1t3 should be suitable As a minimum slabs should be at least 6 inches in thickness and be reinforced with at least #3 bars on 12 inch centers each way. I 9.2 Building 1979 •: . •. .. • . ... As , previously discussed, the potential for additional settlement of Building 1979 is• relatively small In our opinion the addition can be constructed using a stiffened conventional foundation system, tied into the existing foundations. This assumes that • • some risk of cosmetic cracking is acceptable In addition it should be recognized that the risk of soil liquefaction will remain If these risks are not acceptable then compaction grouting should be performed beneath both the existing building and the addition . ... . •. . • •, • . .:. . • •• . I H : •• . . • •. '•'•••• • Geoleclinics Incoi pOI iled I Schumacher Project No 0272-001700 December 4; 1995 ' : Doc. #5-0570 Page 12 I 9 2 1 Foundation Design The following design parameters assume that the new foundations will bear in the existing compacted fill soil and that the risk of cosmetic cracking is acceptable Allowable Soil Bearing 1,000 psI (allow a one-third increase for short-term I wind or seismic loads) Minimum Footing Width 12 inches S ,• , , Minimum Footing Depth: , 24 inches below lowest adjacent soil grade. •' : I Minimum Reinforcement Two no 5 bars at both top and bottom in continuous footings New foundations should be adequately dowelled into existing foundations where they adjoin. Lateral Resistance Lateral loads against structures may be resisted by S ,' ' . S •, , S friction between the bottoms of footings or slabs and I the supporting soil A coefficient of friction of 0.3 is recommended Alternatively, a passive pressure of 350 lbs/ft3 is recommended for the portion of vertical I foundation members embedded into compacted fill If friction and passive pressure are combined the passive pressure value should be reduced by one- third 9.2.2 'Interior Concrete On-Grade Slabs I Slabs should be designed for the anticipated loading. If an elastic design is used,' U a modulus of subgrade reaction of 350 kips/1t3 should be suitable As a minimum, slabs should be at least 6 inches in thickness and be reinforced with at least #3 bars on 12 inch centers each way. I 9 3 General Construction 9.3.1. Plan Review It is éc6mmendéd that foundation and grading plan's be reviewed by Geotechnic S . Incorporated prior to plan Jinalization. Our preliminary recommendations will then I be evaluated and any warranted modifications made Ceotechiiics Iiicoi I)Oi tetI I I Schumacher . . Project No. 0272001-00 December 41995 Doc. #5-0570 -. . .: Page 13, I 9.3.2 Site Preparation 9.3;2.i General: Clearing of the proposed addition site should include the I removal of any structures pipes road pavements vegetation or general debris Any deleterious material including construction debris rocks over 6 inches in greatest dimensio?i or soil containing vegetation debris should not be used in site fills Soil that is disturbed during the removal of vegetation should be replaced with corrpacted fill 9..3.2.2 Buildings Areas In the area of the planned additions and at least 5 feet outside the structural perimeters (where possible) all loose surficial soil should be excavated to expose competent fill material. We-anticipate . that from one to two feet of removals will be necessary. The bottom of the I excavation should be observed by the geotechnical consultant The removed soil that is free of deleterious material should then be replaced in accordance with Section 9.4 as a uniformly compacted fill to the proposed I subgrade elevations These recommendations should be considered subject to revision based on field conditions observed by the geotechnical consultant 9.3.3 Excavation Observation Foundation excavations and site grading excavations should be observed by I Geotechnics Incorporated During grading Geotechnics Incorporated should provide observation and testing services continuously. Such observations are I considered essential to identify field conditions that differ from those anticipated by the preliminary investigations to adjust designs to actual field conditions and to determine that the grading is accomplished in general accordance with the I recommendations of this report Recommendations presented in this report are contingent upon Geotechnics Incorporated performing such services Our I personnel should perform sufficient testing of fill during grading to support our, professional opinion as to compliance with compaction recommendations I) Geotechiiics Incoi 1)01 ated I I . Schumacher . .. . .. . Project Nd. 0272-001-00 December 4, 1995 . . . 0 Doc. #5-0570 Page 14 I 9•30•4 Fill Compaction . ' . •. All fill and backfill to be placed in association with site improvements should be accomplished at slightly over optimum moisture conditions and using equipment 'I • that is capable of producing a uniformly compacted product. The minimum relative : compaction recommended for fill is 90 percent of rnaximurri density based On ASTM D1557 (modified Proctor) Sufficient observation and testing should be performed by the geotechnical consultant so that an opinion can be rendered as :to the compaction achieved. Fill should 'contain no rock material greater that 6 inches in greatest dimension Trench backfill should not contain rock or bedrock I fragments larger than 3 inches Imported fill sources if needed should be observed prior to hauling onto the site I to determine the suitability for use Representative samples of imported materials and on site soils should be tested by the geotechnical consultant in order to . . . . evaluate their appropriate engineering properties. Imported soil should have an I ' . '' expansion index of no more that 20 based on UBC Test Method 29-2.': I During grading operations soil types other than those analyzed in the geotechnical reports may be encountered by the contractor. The geotechnical consultant should . ' be notified to evaluate the suitability of these soils for use as fill and, as finish I . .. grade soils. ' . , . . '' . . • .• I.. '. 9.3.5 Site Drainage • • . • • .I " • • . .. Foundation and slab performance depends greatly on how well the rurioff.waters drain from the site. This is true both during construction and over the entire life of the structure. The ground urface around structures should be graded so That • • 'I • • • . water. flows rapidly away from the structures without ponding. . The surface gradient needed to achieve this depends on the prevailing landscape. In general, •o • I we recommend that pavement and lawn areas within five feet of buildings slope 0 , 0 ;' away at gradients' of at,Iéast two'percent. Densely vegetated areas, should have ;' • .:. . minimum gradients of at least five percent away frOm buildings'in the first'five feet. ' • Densely vegetated areas are considered those in which the planting type and • . •. • • 'spacing'is such that the flow of water is impeded. • 0 • • . •• i . .: • • 0 • •' • • 0 • Geoteclitucs Incou P01 ated I Schumacher Project No 0272-001-06, December 4, 1995 . . . 0 ' Doc.'95-0570' ' Page 15 Planters shOuld, be built so that water from them will not seep into the foundation, slab, or pavémént areas. Site irrigation should be 'limited to the minimum necessary to sustain landscaping plants. Should excessive irrigation, water line breaks, or unusually high rainfall occur, saturated zones or "perched" groundwater ..' may 'develop in fill soils. Any subgrade portions of the site 'should have a back- drain constructed for exterior walls. 9.3.6 Moisture Protection for Slabs: Concrete slabs resting on soil ultimately; cause the' moisture content of the underlying soils to rise. This results from',.' continued capillary rise and the ending of normal evapotranspiration. As concrete is permeable, moisture will eventually, penetrate the slab Unless some protection is provided. I To decrease the likelihood of problems related to damp slabs suitable moisture protection measures should be used where 'moisture sensitive 'floor coverings or other factors warrant. A commonly ,used moisture protection consists of about four inches of clean sand covered by 'visqueen' plastic sheeting. In addition, two inches of sand are placed bér the plastic to decrease concrete during problems I associated with placing concrete directly on an impermeable membrane It has been our experience that such systems will transmit from approximately 6 -to 12 I pounds of moisture per 1000 square feet per day. This may be excessive for some applications.'', if more protection is needed, we recommend that the slab be underlain by at least 6-inches of minus 3/4-inch crushed rock, with no plastic, membrane. In addition, it is recommended that a low water-cement ratio (0.5 maximum) be used for , cement, and that the slab be moist-cured for at least five,days in accordance with ' methods recommended by the American Concrete Institute. Oh-site quality control I ' ' • " ' .' should be used to 'confirm the design conditions. 9.37 Exterior Slabs: Exterior slabs and sidewalks may be constructed directly on the site soils. Reinforcement and control joints will reduce the cracking and : •0 movement potential. As 'a minimal recommendation,' slabs should be at least 5½ inches thick and should be reinforced with at least #3 rebars on 24 inch centers, . each way. Crack control joints should be placed on at least 10 foot centers, each Way. One inch of diffe'rential movement is not considered unusual, ,and more is " Ceotechnics IncoFporated I Schumacher . . . . . . . . . Project No. 0272-001-00 December 4, 1995 .. . . . - Doc. #5-0570 Page 16 I possible Differential movement between buildings and exterior slabs or between I sidewalks and curbs may be decreased by dowelling the slab into the foundation or curb and/or by capping the expansive soil with at least two feet of non- expansive soil I 9 3.8 Expansive Soils The near surface fill soils observed during our investigation was predominantly low 'plasticity sandy clays (SC). Laboratory testing, of representative samples gave expansion indices, of 42 and 51, which is considered to be' a low to medium potential for expansion based on Uniform Building Code criteria Figure C-5 in the I appendix summarizes the expansion test results 9 .3. 9 Reactive Soils Because of the likelihood that the sulfate content of the on site soil or groundwater I is sufficient to react adversely with normal cement we recommend that Type II cement be used in all concrete which will be in contact with soil The sulfate I content of a representative soil sample is given in Figure C-5 9 3 10 Earth Retaining Structures Cantilever retaining walls should be designed for an active earth pressure approximated by an equivalent fluid pressure of 35 lbs/ft3. The active pressure should be used for walls free to yield at the top at least 0.2 percent of the wall height. For walls restrained so that such movement is not permitted, an equivalent' fluid pressure o55 lbstft should be used, based on at-rest soil conditions. 'The, above pressures do not consider any sloping backfill surcharge loads or I hydrostatic pressures If these are applicable they will increase the lateral pressures on the wall and we should be contacted for additional recommendations I Walls should be fully back-drained to relieve any hydrostatic pressure Retaining wall backfill should be compacted to at. least 90 percent relative compaction, based on ASTM D1557. Backfill should not be placed until walls have' ' achieved adequate structural strength Heavy compaction equipment which could I cause distress to walls should not be used I Geotecliiiics Iiicoi 1)01 ted I I Schumacher . . : Project No. 0272-001-00 U. December 4, 1995 . . ; '. Doc. #50570 ': . . . . . . Page 17 I 10.0 LIMITATIONS OF INVESTIGATION This investigation was performed using the .degree of care and skill. ordinarily, exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable geotechnical consultants practicing in this or similar localities. . No other warranty, -expressed or implied, is made as to the conclusions and professioAal opinions included in this report The samples taken and used for testing and the observations made are believed representative of the project site; however, soil and geologic conditions can vaiy' significantly between borings. As in most projects, conditions revealed by excavation may be at variance with preliminary findings. If this occurs,"the changed conditions must be evaluated by the geotechnical consultant and additional recommendations made if warranted I This report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the owner, or of his representative to ensure that the information and recommendations contained herein are brought to the attention of the necessary design consultants for the project and incorporated into the,. I •.' • plans, and the necessary steps are takeh to see that the contractors carry out such recomrriendg-. tions in the field The findings of this. report are valid as of the present date., However, changes in,theconditiori •. of a property can occur with the passage of time, whether due to natural processes or the work of man on this or adjacent properties. In addition, changes in applicable or appropriate standards of practice may occur from legislation or the broadening of knowledge Accordingly, the findings I ' of this report may be invalidated wholly or' partially by changes outside our control. Therefore, .'• • - ; this report is subject to review and should not be relied uponafter a period, of three years.. I . ' .. . • . . . 0 • GEOTECHNICS INCORPORATED NIX C .' . 4 ' Anthony F. Belfast, P.E. 40333 . Matthew-A. Fagan . . . • I • Principal • . 0 • • ' . . , Staff Engineer . . , . • I Geotechnics Incot 1)01 ated I I • I I I • • APPENDIX A i REFERENCES I ¼t j • • • • • 2 I I • Ceotechnics Incorporated .1.., :0 . APPENDIX A REFERENCES 0 American Society for Testing and Materials, 1992, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Section 4, • •. 0 Construction, Volume 04.08 Soil and Rock; Dimension Stone Geoynthetics, ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, 1296 p. Anderson, J. G. , Rockwell, T. K., Agnew, D. C. 1989, PastandPóssible Future Earthquakes of I '. 2 ' Significance to the San Diego Region, Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 5, No. 2. pp 299335. I California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology, 1975, Recommended.., Guidelines for Determining the Maximum Credible and the Maximum Probable .1 . . Earthquakes: California Division of Mines and Geology Notes, Number 43. . 0 0 0 International Conference of Building Officials, 1991, Uniform Building Code (with California, . 0 Amendments) Title 23. Jennings, C. W. 1975, Fault Map of California, with Locations of Volcanoes, Thermal Springs, and I . Thermal Wells, California Geologic Data Map Series, Map No. 1 ' . .• 0 0 Jennings, C. W. 1994, Fault Activity Map of California and Adjacent Areas, with Locations and . Ages of Recent Volcanic Eruptions, California Geologic Data Map Series, Map No. 6 ' Kenriedy,.M. P., and Peterson, G. L., 1975, Geology of San Diego Metropolitan Area, California: . 0 0 0 California Division, of Mines and Geology Bulletin 200, 56 p. 1 .. 0 • 0 • •: . 0 .0 0 0 San Diego County, 1968 (Revised 1975), Metropolitan Topographic Survey of the City of San ' 0 , Diego, Encinitas Quadrangle, 24000 Scale. Seed, H. B., and Idriss, I. M., 1982, Ground Motions and Soil Liquefaction during Earthquakes:. 0 . ., Berkeley, California, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, 134p. • • .. . . '• . Wesnousky, & G., 1986, Earthquakes, Quaternary Faults', and Seismic Hazard in California: . • Journal of Geophysical Research V. 91, no. B12, p. 12587-12631. I .' •.:' .0 • ', • Geotechiiics Incorporated 0 0 • • ,, 0 0 0 0 , I ..: . APPENDIX B I SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION Field exploration consisted of a visual reconnaissance of the site, and the drilling of exploratory- I borings on October 27 1995 An 8-inch diameter, truck mounted hollow stem flight auger was used to investigate the subsurface conditions at the site Three auger borings were drilled across I .. -the site. The maximum depth of exploration was 38 feet. Soil samples were visually. classified. - - --- in the field and retained for laboratory testing. - The approximate locations , of the borings are. -- -, shown on Figure ? Site Plan.. Logs desOribing the subsurface conditions encountered are presented on the following Figures B-I through B-6 One additional boring was made inside the building with a hand auger on November 16',1995 The approximate location of this boring is also shown in Figure 2 A log describing the conditions found is presented in Figure B-7 Disturbed samples were collected using a Standard Penetration Test sampler (2-inch outside - - I diameter) Standard Penetrometer samples were sealed in plastic bags labeled and returned to the laboratory for testing. Relatively undisturbed samples-were collected using a 3-inch outside I diameter, ring lined sampler (modified California sampler) Ring samples were sealed in plastic . - - - bags, placed in rigid plastic containers, labeled, and returned to the laboratory for testing. - The - - - drive weight for these samples was a 140-p6und; down-hole hammer with a free fall of 30 inches: I For each sample, we recorded the number of blows needed to drive the sampler 6, 12, and 18 - - inches The number of blows needed to drive the final 12 inches is shown on the attached logs I - - under "blows per ft." Undisturbed samples were also collected using a 3-inch diameter 30 -inch: - - long, thin walled sample tube (Shelby -Tube). The Shelby Tubes were driven with hydraulic down - - - - - I pressure for 22 inches Shelby Tubes were sealed with plastic caps and taped Portions of the - - -. -, Shelby Tube samples were -extruded for laboratory testing.. Bulk samples are indicated on the - ; boring logs with shading, whereas Standard Pen samples are indiOated with vertical lines, and. -- - - - I ring samples with horizontal lines Shelby tube samples are indicated by diagonal lines with the drive pressure reported alongside the sample - - The borings were located-by visually estimating and pacing distances from landmarks shown on:- - the Site Plan The locations shown should not be considered more accurate than is implied by - - - - - - the method of measurement used and the scale of the map. The lines designating the. interface - - between differing soil materials on the logs may be abrupt or gradational Further, soil conditions I -, - -- at locations between the excavations maybe substantially different from those at the specific - locations explored It should be recognized that the passage of time can result in changes in the - -soil conditions reported in our logs:'. - - - - .- - - - - - - - - -: - - -- Ceo tech nics Incorporated - - - - -- - - - - - - I LOG OF EXPLORATION BORING NO. I Logged by MAF 0 Date: I 0I27I95 Method of -Drilling::.8 Inch Hollow Stem Flight Auger Elevation F S C p. uJ 0. () 0 • •0 •0 wUj U •0 0 ••• DESCRIPTION 0' LAB TESTS r., I-Uj - Z .0 . •0 Ui 0 LU 0. . -• . . FILL: Clayey sand (SC), fine to medium grainéd, low plasticity, . 1 light yellow brown, moist medium dense. 2 300 95.5 20 Contains dense sandstone chunks. Gray with 1/8 orange laminates. Consolidation psi . . .. . . . Unit Weight (20') . . . Moisture 4 .. 0 0 ... 5 . . . 550 100.2 19 . . . •0 . . Unit Weight 6 psi . . . ,. . . . . Moisture (20") Shear 7 . 0 mottled.orangé, green, black, moist, medium dense. . . . 13 . . Contains plant material including roots. Specific Gravity 9 Clayey sand.(SC), fine to medium grained, low plasticity, .........Direct . . 10 . .. . . . . . . . . - 600 100.6 22 . . . .•. . . Consolidation 11 psi . ', _ . . . . : Unit Weight • (20") . . . . . . Moisture . . 12 . . S •. . . Gradation 16 ALLUVIUM (Qal): Clayey sand (SC), medium plasticity; black, moist, 13 . . medium dense. ContOins abundant plant material: Possibly topsoil layer. Atterberg . 14 15 200 107.3 1.. 0 .. . Consolidation . . . 0 16 psi . . 0 0 . . . Unit Weight (20") -• . .,• . . . . . . . Moisture:. 17 . . . . . . . 48 .114.7 17 Clayey sand (SC), low plasticity, brown, wet, medium dense. • Unit Weight 18 • . • .. Minor plant material. -. 0 • • Moisture. 19 0 0 • • S • • . S -20 ............. 250 ........... Saturated. • . . . . . 0 S. . . Psi . 0 0 • • . . • 0• •S PROJECT NO. 0272-001-00 .. . GEOTECHNICS INCORPORATED .. FIGURE: B-i I I LOG OF EXPLORATION BORING NO, 2. Logged by MAF .. S S 1 bate: 10127195 Method of Drilling: 8 Inch Hollow Stem. Flight Auger S Elevation: F.S.G. I'- Ui. U. u.I I Q. j a. u.I U•, S tu U. S . ,DESCRIPTION. LAB TESTS.' CL W ..J 2 W 0 _j ' FILL FILLE Clayey sand (SC), fine to medium grained, low plasticity, brown, 'moist, medium dense. Mottled with orange, gray, and -. green dense sandstone chunks Gradation 2 Atterberg 17 Expansion 3 4 5 29 Same. Cbntáiris some black organic plant debris.' 6 57 8 9 19 400 114.6 16 Clayey sand (SC), fineto medium grained, low plasticity, light gray, .. Unit Weight 11 psi • . , ' moist, dense. ' . . ' ' S 5 , '. : S' Moisture (20) 12 .13' 14 ' 15 - ALLUVIUM (Qal): Sandy clay (CL), medium plasticity, dark olive gray, 27 .104.3 21 moist, hard. ..Contains abundant plant material. 'Possibly topsoil layer.' Unit Weight 16 : ' ' 5 ' 5 5 5 . S ' 5 . S ' Moisture 17 18 19 200 psi PROJECT NO. 0272-001-00 " GEOTECHNICS INCORPORATED' . S'S ,FIGURE:B-3 I LOG OF EXPLORATION BORING NO.2 Logged by MAF . .. Date: . 10127/95 Method of Drilling: 8 Inch Hollow Stem Flight Auger Elevation F.S.G. I- W 0.0. U. - UJW _I ° 0 - - uLL Lu DESCRIPTION . LAB TESTS LU r. ~ - 2 0 0 . 0• w .- . . .. . . - 200 - - - ALLUVIUM (Qal): Sandy clay (CL), medium plasticity, dark olive gray, '. No Sample Retrieved 21 psi wet, soft. •- . . 20 c:) ...... 22 .. ..:-............................... Saturated .. -• . . 150 93.2 . . . Consolidation 23 psi '. . . . Unit Weight (20') . . .0 Moisture 24 . . 25 . . . . . . 300 91.9 24 . . . . .. Consolidation 26 psi - . : . . .. . •00 Unit Weight (20") . ,. . . . : . Moisture :27 35 99.0 25 Same. Contains considerable plant debris. . . . Unit Weight 28 .• : . . . . . . . Moisture 29 . . .. . . 30 . . . . 19 Specific Gravity 31 Clayey sand (SC), mediumgrained, low plasticity, orange brown, wet, medium dense. . . . . . . . :32 34 35 900 . 0 .• ..' . . 0 . . . . . . 0,• 0 36 (6") . SANTIAGO FORMATION (Tsa): Clayey sandstone (SC), fine to medium . .. grained, low plasticity, gray with 1/8" orange laminates, dry to moist, . . . 37 dense to very dense. Moderately weathered. .• . -. - (12"),11 34 38 39 . Total Depth = 38 Feet Groundwater Encountered @ 22 Feet . .40 GrpundwaterStänding 17 Feet Backfilled 10/27/95 - - -: PROJECT NO 0272-001-66 GEOTECHNICS INCORPORATED FIGURE B-4 I i : LOG OF EXPLORATION BORING NO.-3' • . . .: Logged by MAF Date 10/27/95 Method of Drilling: 8 Inch HollOw Stem Flight Auger .. .. . . Elevation: FS.G Ui 0. 0.. ui . . DESCRIPTION : LAB TESTS CL o .~.-J z' 0 . FILL: Clayey sand (SC) fine to medium grained, low. plasticity, •• . .. I.. 1 . olive gray, moist medium dense Gradation I 2 20 Atterberg Expansion 3 . . ,... I '5 .. . . .. . . .. . . . .. I 40 112.3 16 Specific Gravity Unit Weight ALLUVIUM (Qal): Sandy clay (CL),, medium plasticity, dark brown,.: . Moisture I 7 moist hard Contains abundant plant material Possibly topsoil layer I I 10 17 11 I ..' Saturated. • ' I 14 Sandy clay (CL) fine to medium grained medium plasticity, I 15 - . brown, wet, medium dense. 28 96.7 27 ........':......... Unit Weight 16 . ' '' . . . . • ' : ' . Moisture • 17 18 19 20 ,..I,..... L , ...,. :". .. ,......... PROJECT NO 0272-001-00 GEOTECHNICS INCORPORATED FIGURE 8-5 I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SO -D -. r w -I.cn Cl, - . - ..• - .. - -- - : .' •- - I - . --- -., ., .. -:. - -•- '-'i:' I I I APPENDIX C I LABORATORY TESTING Selected representative samples of soils encountered were tested using test methods of the American .Society for Testing and Materials, or other generally accepted standards. A brief description of the tests performed follows: 0 0 0 Classification: Soils were classified visually according to the Unified Soil Classification System.' Visual classification was supplemented by laboratory testing of selected samples and clas- sification in accordance with ASTM D2487 The soil classifications are shown on the Boring Logs. .. 0 ' 0• '0 ' ', In-Situ Moisture/Density The in-place moisture content and dry unit weight of selected samples I were determined using relatively undisturbed samples from the liner rings of a 2.5 inch ID Modified California sampler.: The dry unit weight and moisture content are shown on the Boring '0 Logs of Appendix B Particle Size Analysis Particle size analyses were performed in accordance with ASTM D422 'The, grain size distribution was used to determine presumptive 'strength' parameters used to develop foundation design criteria The results are given in Figures C. .1 through C-4 I Atterberg Limits ASTM D4318-84 was used to determine the liquid limit, plastic limit, and plasticity index of selected fine-grained samples The results are summarized in Figures C-i I through C-4 I Expansion Index The expansion potential of selected soils was characterized by using the test method ASTM D 4829 Figure C-5 provides the results of the tests I ' "Specific Gravity: The specific gravity of selected soils was.found using test method ASTM D854:. Figure C-5 provides the test results. Direct Shear Test The shear strength of the foundation bearing soil was assessed through direct shear, tests performed in accordance with ASTM D3080 The results are shown in Figure C-6 Consolidation Test One dimensional consolidation properties of selected samples were I evaluated using ASTM D2435 The samples were restrained laterally and drained axially while subjected to incrementally applied controlled stress loading. The unsaturated fill samples were first, loaded to, approximately their in-situ stress, and then inundated with water in order to estimate their collapse potential The test results are summarized in Figures C-7 through C-12 Geotechiiics Incoi 0I ated — — — — ---------------- lima. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — U.S. Standard Sieve Sizes 11 4 IR ;NA lip #16 #100 =50— 100 0 10 90 ---- 20 80 __ __ __ __ __ 30 70 ----- __ ---- > 40. 50 --- 60 40 ----- ' - 30 - 70 80 20 -___-- ____ - ___ ___ ____ .10 - ___ 90 0 ThH HHH LHH•H HHH H HHH 100 .100 10 1 Grain Size in Millimeters 0.1 , 0.01 0.001 COARSE J FINE COARSE I MEDIUM FINE , SILT AND CLAY GRAVEL SAND SAMPLE UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION: Sc ATTERBERG LIMITS EXPLORATION NUMBER: B2 LIQUID LIMIT: 33 SAMPLE LOCATION: . 1-4 DESCRIPTION: CLAYEY SAND PLASTIC LIMIT: 22 PLASTICITY INDEX: 11 Geotechnics lEicorporated. PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS AND ATTERBERG LIMITS' PROJECT NO. 0272-001-00. DOG. #5:0570 FIGURE .CA. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - U.S. Standard Sieve Sizes 11 4 "" #100 0I---Hvdrometer 100 a E4 ---- __ __ 10 90 __ 20 80 30 70 __ __ ---- eo 11111 11111 11111 11111 __ 111111 __ 40 ___ ___ ___ 50 60 1-40 CL ------ 30 ---- 70 - ___ 80 20 10 - ___ ------ ___ - --P---- 90 0HHHH 11W HHHI H HHH HHflH 100 100 10 1 Grain Size in Millimeters 0.1 0.01 0.001 COARSE FINE COARSE . MEDIUM I FINE I SILT AND CLAY GRAVEL SAND SAMPLE UNIFIED SOIL. CLASSIFICATION: Sc AT1ERBERG LIMITS EXPLORATION NUMBER: B3 LIQUID LIMIT: 35 SAMPLE LOCATION: 1-5 DESCRIPTION: CLAYEY SAND PLASTIC LIMIT: 18 PLASTICITY INDEX: 17 Adfth, Geotechnics Incorporated PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS AND ATTERBERG LIMITS PROJECTNO. 0272-001-00. DOC. # 5-0570. . FIGURE.C-2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - U.S. Standard Sieve Sizes 1-lI"_3/_ /R' fiA #100 0(—-- --_#1Q. ---450- 100 . • ______ ______ 10 90 20 80 ___ ___ ____ ____ ____ C 30 70 ------ ___ ___ ____ ____ -------- 40 po I] -- cc 50 -----_.---- 60 40 a -------- --•---- w 30 70 80 20 ------ ____ ___ ___ ___ 1: LThfl mr in 1 100 90 H H -0- 100 10 1 Grain Size in Millimeters 0.1 0.01 0.001 COARSE I FINE COARSE I MEDIUM FINE SILT AND GRAVEL SAND CLAY [ SAMPLE UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION: Sc A1TERBERG LIMITS EXPLORATION NUMBER: Bi LIQUID LIMIT: 35 SAMPLE LOCATION: 12-131W DESCRIPTION: CLAYEY SAND PLASTIC LIMIT: 20 PLASTICITY INDEX: 15 Geotechnics Incorporated PARTICLE. SIZE. ANALYSIS • AND ATTERBERG LIMITS PROJECT NO 6272-001-00 DOC. # 5-0570 FIGURE C4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Standard Sieve Sizes lip 6 3_-50-_ #100 - -#------- H'Q!91L_ ---3/fid 100 0 __ __ 10 90 __ __ __ 20 80 ___ ___ Ilk I ___ ___ ___ 30 c70 1: 40.0 __ __ __ ------- __ ------ __ 50 -- O ------ -——-H-- ___ 4- -- ___ ------ ------v- _------ _----.- 60 40 ----- ____ ------- ----- ------- ____ ------ ----- 30 -•---- ----- ------\ ------- 70 20 10 90 OWH HH H H H HuH H .100 100 10 1 Grain Size in Millimeters 0.1 0.01 . 0.001 COTRSE _7 FINE COARSE I MEDIUM I FINE . SILT AND . CLAY GRAVEL SAND . SAMPLE UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION: SM ATTERBERG LIMITS EXPLORATION NUMBER: 81 LIQUID LIMIT: SAMPLE LOCATION: 25-261/2' DESCRIPTION: SILTY SAND PLASTIC LIMIT: PLASTICITY INDEX: N/P Geotechnics Incorporated . PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS . AND ATTERBERG LIMITS PROJECT NO 0272-001-00 DOC. #5-0570 . FIGURE C-4.. SAMPLE SPECIFIC GRAVITY Bi @7'-8W • • 294 B2 @ 30'-31W 292 B3 @ 5'-6W • 2.80 UBC TABLE NO. 29-C, CSSIFICATION OF EXPANSIVE SOIL • Ge'otechnics '• 0 • Laboratory Test Results Project No. 0272-001-00 i n c o i p o i at e (1 1969/1979 Palomar Oaks Way Document No 5-0570 Schumacher Buildings • 0 Figuie C-5 I SHEAR STRESS VS. STRAIN . .2000' ' LL S. S. . • • I; •U • , •• I • i 1500 El • - -----a— jo__m n SW . . . ' S . • ;1000 'CO' .g' ' ' . ,I • U • ,..< '500 -a----- ' '• ' ' ', . . _____ _____ _____ _____ ui U . Cl) o 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 STRAIN (PERCENT) SHEAR STRESS VS NORMAL LOAD 2000 - S . ' 'S . .• ' - 1800 -. 1600 1400 0. ui' 1200'- W W 1000 ' :. ' '1 ' .. ' '• .'. ',. .-800,- *PEAK ' '' . .' ' ' o'ULTIMATE ui . 600 400' L- • 200 0 0.. 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 NORMAL STRESS, PSF ,. . S ., '' • , PEAK ULTIMATE ' ANGLE OF INTERNAL FRICTION: 28 Degrees .1 .32 Degrees APPARENT COHESION 812 psI 572 psI 'SAMPLE: B @ 5 - 6/' . •' ' S . • Consolidated Drained Test S • ' ' Geotechnics S Diiect Shear Test Results S ' '. S ' ' Project NO. 0272-001-00' . S - • Incorporated, 1969/1979 Palomar Oaks Wy . Schumacher Building ,. , , ': Document No.5-0570 ' . • ' FIGURE C-6 S . . 'U,'•' S • I I 0.00% 1.00% 2.00% 3.00% 4.00% 5.00% 6.00% 7.00% 8.00% 9:00% 10.00% 11.00% : DEGREE OF SATURATION [%] SAMPLE HEIGHT [IN] . DRY DENSITY[PCF] SPECIFIC GRAVITY (From ASTM D 854) . VOID RATIO WATER CONTENT[%] Consolidation Test Results Project No. • 0272-001-00 1 • • '..J C 0 iC C ii fl I C S • 1969/1979 Palomar Oaks Way Document No. 5-0570 T n C 0 r p o rate d Schumacher Building Figure C-7 1.. ••. . • .•. .• • • ,1.0000 0.9085 95.5 105.1 2.94. 2.94 0.92 . .0.75 19.9 21.2 63.6 83.6 0.00% N 1.00% 2.00% 3.00% a- 5.00% I 600% .7.006/6 100.0 1000.0 10000.0 . 100006.0 Stress [psi] B1@10 /2 INITIAL FINAL S SAMPLE HEIGHT [IN] DRY DENSITY [PCF] S SPECIFIC GRAVITY (From ASTM D 854) VOID RATIO . WATER CONTENT [%] DEGREE OF SATURATION Consolidation Test Results Project No. 0272-001-00 G e 0 t e c 11 fl 1 C S 1969/1979 Palomar Oaks Way. Document No. -5-0570 incorporated Schumacher Building• . Figure C-8 1.0000 0.9478 100.6 _106.1 2.94 2.94 0.82 0.82 0.73 .21.5 22.8 76.5. 91.8 0.00% 1.00°6 2.00% 3.00% 4.00% '-I 5.00% 6.00% IL 7.00% 8.00% 9.00% 10.00% 11.00% SAMPLE HEIGHT [IN] ; •. .•• DRY DENSITY [PCF] . . SPECIFIC GRAVITY (From ASTM D 854) . . VOID RATIO WATER CONTENT [%J • • DEGREE OF SATURATION [%] Consolidation Test Results Project No 0272 001 00 G e 0 t e C ii fl 1 C S 1969/1979 Palomar Oaks Way Document No 5-0570 I n c 0 r p o rate d Schumacher Building Figure C-9 U 1.0000 0.9044 107.3 118.7 2.80 2.80 0.63 0.47 16.7. 17.1 74.4. 101.4 0.00% -- ____ liii 11111 ____ 11111111 1.00% . 2.00% 3.00% 4.00% 5.00%. 6.00% ------ C 7.00% U) 8.00% 0. 9.00% 10.00% 11.00% 12.00% ---- 1300% 14.00% _Htl 15.00% ------ 100.0 . 1000.0 10000.0 . 100000.0 Stress [psf] . BI@20'-2116' . INITIAL FINAL _SAMPLE HEIGHT [IN] _______DRY DENSITY [PCF] _ SPECIFIC GRAVITY (From ASTM D 854) _VOID RATIO _WATER CONTENT [%] _ _______ DEGREE OF SATURATION [%] Consolidation Test Results Project No. 0272-001-00 G e o t e C h fl 1 C S 1969/1979 PalomarOaks Way Document No. 5-0570 I n C o r p o r ate d Schumacher Building Figure C-10 • 0.8846 103.5 2.92 t 0.76 24.4 93.4 000% 1.00% ---- 2.00% -------- '3.00% 4.00% 5.00% ' ------- . i-i 600% 7.00% U) 800% 0. 9.00% _____ _____ ' 10:000A 11.00% 12.00% •'' ____ ____ 1440 0% 15.00% ------ -i----- ___ 100.0 ' 1000.0 , ' ' 10000.0 ' 100000.0 ,Stress [psf] B2@22t-231/21, INITIAL FINAL Consolidation Test Results Project No. 0272-001-00 G e o te CiTI fl 1 C S '1969/1979 Palomar Oaks Way . Document No. 5-0570 Incorporated Schumacher Building.: • ' Figure 9-1 SAMPLE HEIGHT [IN] DRY DENSITY [PCF] 854) SPECIFIC GRAVITY (From ASTM D VOID RATIO _ WATER CONTENT [%] _ DEGREE OF SATURATION [%] 0.8695 107.2 N 2.92 0.70 21.7 90.5 I 0.00% 1.00% 2.00% 3.00% C. C/) 4.00% C U w a-. 5.00% 6.00% 7.00% 8.00% SAMPLE HEIGHT [IN] . . . . DRY DENSITY [PCF] . .. SPECIFIC GRAVITY (From ASTM D 854) _____ • VOID RATIO . WATER CONTENT [%].. . .. DEGREE OFSATURATION [°"°J Consolidation Test Results Project No. 0272-001-00 4. 1 e,o i e C fl fl! C S • . 1969/1979 Palomar Oaks Way Document No. 5-0570 Incorporated • Schumacher Building • • Figur6 C-12 1.0000 0.9371 91.9 98.1 2.92 2.92 0.98 0.86 24.3 26.6 72.2 90.5 SCHUMACHER ENGINEERING 1969 Palomar Oaks Wa - Carlsbad, CA 92009 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS & OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION ANALYSIS I + TABLE OF CONTENTS :. SECTION SUBJECT PAGE • A : Findings & Requirements . A 1-48 - 1 0 Overview 1-7 , 1.1 Scope •. •: 1 1.2 Summary . S 2-3' 1.1 Report Format 4-6 1;4S.' Code References ; - -' .•. 1.5 Information 1 7 • : 2.0' Prójectlnformation •• . . 8-9 3.0 Occupancy Classifications • 4.0 10-12 - Occupancye Specific Requirements . 13-38 4.1 . General S - 13 4.2 Group F, Division 1 Occupancy Control Area Requirements . . . 14 4.3 - Group H Division 2 Occupancy Requirements 15-21 4.4 H, Division 3 Occupancy Requirements *. .. ,Group . 22-30 4.5. Group ,H, Division 7 Occupancy Requirements 31-38 5.0 •. General Requirements . •. -, T .' 39-- • j B ' Hazardous MaterialsAnalysis B B1-A Building 1 - Quality Assurance Research & Development Expansion Bl-B Building 1 - Chemical Production Chemical Production & Packaging Engineering Glass Shop RGA BI-C . Building 1-Storage Room 501 . • S - BI-D - Building .1 - Storage Room.502 B1-E • Building 1 - Storage Room 503 - • •• - • * .. I BI-F V Building 1 - Control .Area 1 & 2 • V 132A Building 2- Chemical Production, R&DRelocated, Shipping & Receiving, - B2-13 TEOS Expansion TRANS Expansion Building 2 -Storage Room 505 •. . • • . - 132-C Building 2 - Control Area 1 • •. . - B3 • w. Exterior/Outdoor Storage Areàs ••• S S • V 134 . Master Inventory - Buildings 1 & 2and Exterior/Outdoor Storageareas V • Appendices V V . S V -- ADefinitions for Abbreviations Al B Facility Layout ,. 131-132 V 4V V ' • - •V - S . SCHUMACHER ENGINEERING: 1969 Palomar Oaks Way- Carlsbad, CA 92009 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS & OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION ANALYSIS SECTION 'A: FINDINGS AND REQUIREMENTS 1.0 OVERVIEW 11 Scope J This Technical Report been prepared by Eriksen-Rattan Associates Inc. at the request of Schumacher 0 Engineering. The report addresses Uniform Building Code and Uniform Fire Code requirements applicable to hazardous materials associated with Schumacher Engineering's existing and proposed production and storage operations at their facility located at 1969 Palomar Oaks Way, in the City of Carlsbad, California. I The Technical Report focuses on Code requirements and provisions applicable to reclassification of / existing operations and classification of proposed operations in accordance with the 1994 editions of the / Uniform Building Code and Uniform Fire Code. The difference in requirements and provisions between the 1991 and 1994 Codes as applied to Schumacher's "hazardóus'operations is minimal, except for an increase in allowable building area for Group H Division 3 Occupancies and new requirements for I compressed gases. With the exception of Group H, bivision 3 Occupancies and compressed gases, V compliance with the 1991 Codes will, for the most part, provide compliance with the 1994 Codes because f the 1994 Codes are less restrictive than the 1991 Codes as they apply to hazardous materials I The types and amounts of hazardous materials, storage arrangements and use conditions addressed herein are based on information provided to Eriksen-Rattan Associates Inc. by Schumacher Engineering and McGraw/Baldwin Architects. V V Discrepancies between this report and actual field conditions is the sole responsibility of Schumacher VV Engineering. V V V 0 • V • V : V <I V.L V •V0O H V O V: I I Section A Findings & Requirements - Eriksen-Rattan Associates I nc.• - 0 V • 1/16/95 - Page 1 of 48 • SCHUMACHER ENGINEERING: 1969 Palomar Oaks Way - Carlsbad, CA 92009 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS & OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION ANALYSIS 1 1.2. Summary Schumacher Engineering has requested the City of Carlsbad Building and Fire Departments to reclassify existing uses 'and proposed expansion , uses in the building based on the occupancy classifications addressed in the 1994 editions of the Uniform Building and Fire Codes Based on the findings presented in Section B -Hazardous Materials Analysis occupancy classifications for each respective building area in accordance with the 1994 Codes are as follows. The "existing" occupancy designations, based on the - 1985'Codes applied to the building at the time of original construction, are also noted. 1985 coDEs! EXISTING 1994 CODES BUILDiNG , AREA/USE , OCCUPANCY , OCCUPANCY , f I Quality Assurance, H-6 H-7 Research & Development Expansion [Building I - "Area A"] I Chemical Production, H-6 H-3/1-1-7 Chemical Production & Packaging, AN )Engineering Glass Shop, '• - ' J RGA [Building I - "Area B"] Storage Room 501 H1* H-2/H-7 [Building I - "Area'C"] ' *Reclassified in 1994 as Group H Division 2/7 Occupancy Storage Room Storage Room 502 ,. H-1 ' ' H-3 [Building I - "Area 0"] * Reclassified in 1994 as Group H, Division 3 Occupancy Storage Room.' Storage Room 503 H-I'' H-2 [Building I - "Area E"] ' *Reclassified in 1994 as Group H, Division 2 Occupancy Storage Room. Equipment Engineering (103], B-2 ' ' F-I Control Area Equipment Manufacturing [106], Field Service [114], (Building I - "Area F/Control Area 1"] Grinding [404] H3* , , F-I Control Area .I ., [Building I "AreâF/COntrol Area 211] * Reclassified in 1994 as 'Group B, Division 2 'Occupancy Control Area. Section A - Findings & Requirements - Eriksen-Rattan Associates Inc. 1/16/95 - Page 2 of 48 I -SCHUMACHER ENGINEERING: 1969 Palomar Oaks Way - Carlsbad, CA 9009 - HAZARDOUS MATERIALS & OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION ANALYSIS 1985 CODES! - EXISTING 1994 CODES ' BUILDING AREA/USE . OCCUPANCY OCCUPANCY $ 2 Chemical Production [329]*, H-6 H-3/H-7 Research & Development [to be relocated from' Building 1]**, Shipping & Receiving (330], . -. '. TEOS Expansion [New]**, A TRANS Expansion [New]** - [Building 2 - "Area A"]: .. : Production: 994 tenant improvement. - **R&D relocation TEOS & TRANS Expansion Proposed tenant improvements Storage Room 505* H-6 H-3/H-7 [Building 2 - "Area B"] 1 *1994 tenant improvement Machine Shop [401], B-2 F-I Control Area I i Office [402], B-2 Wood Shop [403]* H-3 / [Building 2 - "Area C/Control Area 111] Reclassified in 1994 as part of the Group B, Division 2 Occupancy Control Area. •.. EXTERIOR ESI - Flammable Gas Bunker H-I' . .. 51 -- . STORAGE ES2 - Hydrogen Gas Bunker H-I H-2 ES3 -,inert Gas Bunker B-2 S-2 Ji. ES4 - Oxygen Cryó Bunker B-2 - H-3 ES5 - Pad Storage N/A N/A . [Unenclosed/Outdoor Storage] I ,- •• •- . I The types and amounts of "hazardous" materials associated with each area are identified in Section B - Hazardous Materials Analysis: . . . . ..• Findings and requirements, based on the 1994 Codes, are. 'provided in Section A - Findings and - Requirements,-2 Sections .0 through 5.0. . • • • I • - - I - ' Section A - Findings & Requirements - Eriksen-Rattan Associates inc. • • •- - - • 1/16/95- Page '3of48 . . SCHUMACHER ENGINEERING 1969 Palomar Oaks Way - Carlsbad, CA 92009 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS & OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION. ANALYSIS 1 3 Report Format The report is divided into two [2] main sections with two [2] appendices I Section Contents A Findings and Requirements B Hazardous Materials Analysis I Appendix A Definitions for Abbreviations Appendix B Facility Layout [Existing and Proposed] I Section A provides an overview of. the Section B - Hazardous Materials Analysis and addresses requirements. based on the types and amounts of materials associated with SchUmacher. Engineering's production and storage operations Section A is divided into five [5] sections as follows Section Contents 1.0 Overview 2.0 •. . • Project Information . 30. . Occupancy. Classifications -. . 4.0 Occupancy Specific Requirements 5.0 - • . . General Requirements I $ I I• ,. Section A - Findings & Requirements - Eriksen-Rattan-Associates inc. • •.. - . - 1/16/5- Page 4of48 . • SCHUMACHER ENGINEERING: 1969 Palomar Oaks Way - Carlsbad, CA 92009 • HAZARDOUS MATERIALS &.00CUPANCY CLASSIFICATION ANALYSIS- Section B - Hazardous Materials Analysis identifies the types and amounts of hazardous materials Schumacher Engineering has indicated that currently store and use and plan to store and use based on proposed modifications to Buildings I and 2 Section B is divided into sections as indicated in Section 1.2 and repeated here: . .. Building Section Contents I BI-A Building 1/Area A Quality Assurance, Research & Development Expansion BI-B • Building 1/Atea B Chemical Production, Chemical Production & Packaging, Engineering, Glass Shop, RGA 61-C Building 1/Area C Storage Room 501 131-13 Building 1/Area .D Storage Room 502 . .' . . .. -'. . B1-E Building 1/Area E . • Storage Room 503 I' . • 131-F • Building 1/Area F . S Grinding [404] . S •. 2 . B2-A • Building 2/Area A Chemical Production [329], Research & . •. S Development [to be relocated from Building 1], Shipping .& Receivirg [330], TEOS Expansion [new], TRANS Expansion [new] B 27B Building 2/Area B Storage ROom 5052 B2-.Cl . Building 2/Area C .. • 5 • Machine Shop [401], Office [402], Wood Shop [403] Exterior/Outside B3 • •. ESI - Flammable Gas Bunker ., E52 - Hydrogen Gas Bunker • • • . • • . • ES3- Inert Gas Bunker . . S -• ES4 -Oxygen Gas Bunker • •. S . ES5 - Outside Pad Storage IS. . • Section A - Findings & Requirements - 'Eriksen-Rattan Associates Inc.. • . '• • • 1/16/95 - Page 5 of 48 . • - - - -. - ,'•- -•• ;_• 4 - SCHUMACHER ENGINEERING: 1969 Palomar Oaks -Way- Carlsbad, CA 92009 .- - . .. 0 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS & OCCUPANCY CLASSIICATION ANALYSIS 1.5 lnfcrmation t 00 44 * a 1' Questions regarding Schumacher Engineering's operations should be directed to Lee SenecI I . Schumacher Engineering 1.969 Palomar Oaks Way Carlsbad California 92009 - 1 Telephone (619)931-9555 , 1 FAX (619)931-7819 or 931-7956 4 L *0 1 Questions regarding the existing building conditions and proposed tenant improvements should be .directed to - Bill Pridgen - 1 'McGraw/Baldwin Architects * . -. 0 •4 •• 0 701 B:Street -Suite 200 -- -i - 4' San Diego California 92101-8101 Telephone (619)231-0751 FAX (619)231-4396 I i7 Questions regarding this report should be directed to Eriksen-Rattan - •.• - - 1Mary Eriksen,Rattan Associates lnc - • - I . 8989 Rio San Diego Drive - Suite 200 San Diego, California 92108-1648 • - • -: - Telephone (619)299-6444 I FAX (619)299-1229 - - - 4 I Section A Findings & Requirements Eriksen Rattan Associates inc 4 1/16/95 Page 7of48 SCHUMACHER ENGINEERING 1969 Palomar Oaks Way - Carlsbad, CA 92009 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS & OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION ANALYSIS 2.0 PROJECT INFORMATION Schumacher Engineering's operations are located at 1969 Palomar Oaks Way in the City of Carlsbad The building they occupy is a 1 and '2 story, Type V-N, fully sprinklered building having a total floor area of I ' approximately 63,500 square feet [1st floor = +/-55,420 sf; 2nd floor = +/-8,080 sfj. The building is part of . the Palomár Oaks Business Center and was constructed in 1983-1984 and wasbuilding under the I provisions of the 1985 editions of the 'Uniform Building Code and Uniform Fire Code. 1 The building includes tenant improvements which were built as Group H, Division 6 Occupancy areas with accessory use and storage areas classified at the time of development as Group B, Division' 2, Group H, I . Division '1 and Group H, Division 3 Occupancies. The first floor includes Production, Quality Assurance, L Packaging, Engineering, Research and Development, Shipping and Receiving, Maintenance, Hazardous I' .Materials Storage, office and miscellaneous ancillary functions. Administrative, Marketing and Têchnicál Support functions are located on the second floor. The building is technically divided into two [2] separate buildings [referred to in this report as "Building I and "Building 2'1' by an existing 2-hour area separation wall. The area separation wall was likely '1 constructed to give flexibility in terms of allowable building area or control of hazardous materials. I Building 1 presently contains [based on recent tenant improvements and reclassification of existing - storage and accessory areas]: . . . ..I . One [1] Group B, Division 2 Occupancy Control Area; ' Three [3] separate Group H, Division 6 Occupancy Fabrication Areas; and Three [3] Group H, Division 317 and/or Group H, Division 2/7 Occupancy. Storage- Rooms. - -. - Building 2 presently contains [also based On'. recent tenant improvements and reclassification of existing maintenance/wood shop areas]:. 1 ' - • Two [2] Group H, Division -6 Occupancy Fabrication Areas; and. The remaining area classified as ,a Group B, Division 2 Occupancy Control Area; I -Section A - Findings & Requirements - Eriksen-Rattan Associates Inc.- 1/16/95 Page 8 of 48 SCHUMACHER ENGINEERING: 1969 Palomar Oaks Way Carlsbad, CA 92009 1 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS & OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION ANALYSIS With the rapid rate of growth that Schumacher is experiencing the existing facility will not accommodate I Schumacher's projected need identified for the next five [5] years -,due, in part',to the existing Group H Division 6 Occupancy classification designations. Although designation of production and R&D operations as Group H Division 6 Occupancy Fabrication Areas, and designation of storage rooms as Group H, I Division I Occupancy Storage Rooms may have been the most appropriate classifications at the time of development, such classifications are no longer appropriate for the type of production, R&D and storage Iinvolved with Schumacher's operations Thus Schumacher's need to have the existing facility, along with proposed tenant improvements for expansion of existing operations, addressed through the 1994 editions of the Uniform Building Code and Uniform Fire Code Proposed changes to the existing facility will involve relOcation of some existing operations and expansion of Others.' For example: - • Move existing Research and Development opera'tions from Building Ito Building 2. I • Move existing TEOS operations from Building I to Building 2 and expanding such operations in Building 2. Move existing TRANS operations from Building Ito Building 2 and expanding such operations 1• in Building 2. ' Expand existing Chemical Production, Chemical Production &PCckaging,Engineering, 1. Quality Assurance, and Research & Development Expansion operations in Building 1. Details for relocation and expansion will be provided separately through McGraw/Baldwin Architects. I I I I 1 I - Section A - Findings & Requirements - Eriksen-Rattan Associates inc. - 1116/95- Page 9of48 SCHUMACHER ENGINEERING: 1969 Palomar Oaks Way -Carlsbad, CA 92009 1 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS & OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION ANALYSIS I 1 .- 1994 CObES REASON-MATERIALS BUILDING AREA/USE ' . OCCUPANCY S >EXEMPT AMOUNTS 1. Quality Assurance, H-7 . H-7: Highly Toxics Research & Development Expansion. -, I[Building I - "Area A"] Chemical Production, . . H-311-1-7 H-3: I. Chemical Production & Packaging, Engineering Comb Liqs II Flam Liqs I-B Glass Shop, Unstable Reacts 2 I RGA S - [Building I - "Area B"] . Water Reacts 2 H-7: 5, Highly Toxics - Toxics •- I . Storage Room 501 .- . H-2/H-7 Oxidizers 3 5[Building I - "Area C"] . I . *H..3 materials may be located in H-2 room. Unstab Reacts 2 Water Reacts H-7: Toxics Storage Room. $02 Flam Liqs I-B [Building 1. - 'Area D"] *storage room may be designated as. "H-2" if desired by Schumacher. I . : Storage Room' 503. H-2 . , Water Reacts 3 [Building I -"Area E"] 5- ' Flam' Liqs I-B *H..3 materials may be located in H72 room. . .• .5 - Equipment Engineering.[103], 'F-I Control Area* All Materials- Equipment Manufacturing [106], . . ' Field Service [114] <Exempt Amounts [Building I - "Area FlControl Area I !']' ,*Control Areas 1 & 2,may be addressed as a single- Control Area. Grinding [404] - ' F1 Control Area* All Materials [Building I .- 'Area F/Control Area 21 ] . <Exempt Amounts *Control Areas 1 & 2 may be addressed as a single Control Area: I Section A -Findings & Requirements - Eriksen-Rattan Associates Inc.. - 1/16/95 - Page .11 of 48 I -. - I - -: • 'V . SCHUMACHER ENGINEERING 1969 Palomar Oaks Way - Carlsbad, CA 92009 I HAZARDOUS -14 1 • MATERIALS& OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION, ANALYSIS . I 1994 CODES REASON-MATERIALS BUILDING 'VAREA/USE - OCCUPANCY >EXEMPT AMOUNTS 1 2 Chemical Production [329], H-3/H-7 H-3 - Research '& Development [to be relocated from-Building 1], Combust Liqs II (V Shipping & Receiving [330]; V Flam Liqs I-B ; TEOS Expansion [New], .. . Unstable Reacts 2 ' TRANS Expansion [New] Water Reacts 2 5 [Building 2 - "Area A"] - H-7 Highly Toxics Irritants Other, Health Hazards 1 ..• Toxics V _.f - V . * V .• Storage Room 505 H-31H-7 H-3 Flam Liqs I-B I : [Building 2 - "Area B"] . H-7: Highly Toxics Machine Shop [401], F-I Control Area All Materials - V Office [402], 'V V V <Exempt Amounts V.I Wood Shop [403]. V V [Building 2 - "Area C/Control Area I"] I EXTERIOR ESI - Flammable Gas Bunker S-i V All Materials - V STORAGE* V <Exempt Amounts U ES2 - Hydrogen Gas Bunker H-2 H-2 Flammable Gas 'ES3 - Inert Gas Bunker -S-2 All Materials - . V <Exempt Amounts (V . ES4 - Oxygen Gas Bunker H-3 V H-3: Cryogenic/Oxy ES5. - Pad Storage • V - N/A Outdoors/Unenclosed . V [Unenclosed/Outdoor Storage] . Exempt Amounts N/A V re Occupancy Class V - •--- .,'V' i V - V *Exterior Storage areas ES1 through. ES4 are located in a concreteblock enclosure to the rear of .* Buildings 1 and 2, with Storage addressed as "indoor storage". -Exterior Storage area ES5 is unenclosed, I With storage addressed as "outdoor storage". - - V - - V I t - -. • V'V -I . Section A- Findings & Requirements - Eriksen-Rattan Associate Inc. • V - . V - V • V 1/16/95 - Page 12 of 48 SCHUMACHER ENGINEERING: 1969, Palomar Oaks Way Carlsbad, CA 92009' I HAZARDOUS MATERIALS & OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION ANALYSIS 4.2 Group F. Division I Occupancy Control Area Requirements Each Schumacher building [Lé.:' "Buildings 1' and 2] 'may have up to four, [4] Control Areas, with each , ., , Control Area allowed to have up the exempt amounts of hazardous materials indicated in Uniform Building Code Tables 3-P & 3-E. Based on the Section B -Hazardous Materials Analysis, Schumacher's facility will most likely involve one [1] Control Area in each building:. I '0 A. Building 1: Equipment Engineering, Equipment Manufacturing, Field Se'rviceGrinding'and ancillary areas [rooms 103, 106, 114,404, et al]. '• . . . . . B Building 2 Machine Shop Office Wood Shop [Rooms 401-403] I In a facility such as Schumacher's, .a Control Area ,is most often classified as a Group F, Division I - . Occupancy, but it may be classified as a Group H Occupancy if it is located within, a Group H Occupancy area.. I Three [3] provisions are attached to Control-Areas: I A. Each Control Area must be separated from other Control Areas by one [1] or more of the following such that the Control Area-is bounded-on all sides:' ' . 1-hour fire-resistive occupancy separation. . . . Exterior wall, roof or-foundation of the building. 1994 Codes: . ' UBC 204, Table 3-D, Table 3-E; UFC 204, 8001.8 Each Control Area may have to the Exempt Amounts of hazardous materials indicated in Uniform Building Tables3-D & 3-E without having to comply with Group H Occupancy' requirements. If, however, a Control Area is located within a Group H Occupancy area, the Control Area must comply with the requirements applicable to the Group H Occupancy area. I ' 1994 Codes: UBC 204, 'Table 3-D, Table 3-E; UFC 204,'800 1. 8 The storage, use and handling of hazardous materials in a Control Area must be in 'accordance with general Uniform Building Code and Uniform, Fire Code requirements for such materials. See Section 50 for general requirements. 1994 Codes: ' UBC 304.8, 307.1.1; UFC 7401.1, 7901.1, 8001.1.3 'O ' ' , 0 • 0 ,, , I 'I ' 0 Section A - Findings & Requirements - Eriksen-Rattan Associates Inc. • ' 0 1/16/95- Page 140f48 ' • • • SCHUMACHER ENGINEERING: 1969 Palomar. Oaks Way Carlsbad, CA 92009 I HAZARDOUS MATERIALS & OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION ANALYSIS .. 4.3 Group H. Division 2 Occupancy Requirements . 1 Based on the Section B - Hazardous Materials Analysis, Schumachers facility will require two [2], storage rooms to be classified as GroupH, Division 2-Occupancies: A. Storage.Room 501 - Building 1. . . I B. Storage Room 503 - Building 1. I Although Storage Room 502/Building 1 and Storage Room 505/Building 2 do not require classification as a 'Group H, Division 2 Occupancies, they may be so classified if desired by Schumacher;' Each Group H Division 2 Occupancy storage room may also contain materials requiring classification as a Group H, Division 3 Occupancy and/or Group H, Division 7 Occupancy, provided the room(s) in which such storage is located are constructed to meet all applicable occupancy requirements. For example: A. Storage Room 501 contains Toxics exceeding'Exernpt Amounts and will therefore also need compliance with Group H, Division 7 Occupancy requirements. . I B. Storage Room 501 also contains Unstable Réactives 2 and Water Reactives 2 exceeding Exempt Amounts and will therefore also need compliance with Group H, Division 3 Occupancy requirements. . • ,. . C. Storage Room 502 contains Flammable Liquids I-B exceeding Exempt Amounts.and will therefore also need compliance with Group H, Division 3 Occupancy requirements. I D. Storage Room 503 [if "H-2" classification is desired by Schumacher] contains Flammable •' Liquids I-B exceeding Exempt Amounts and will therefore also need compliance with Group , H, Division 3 Occupancy requirements. E. Storage Room 505 [if "H-2" classification is desired by 'Schumacher] contains Highly loxics exceeding Exempt Amounts and will therefore also need compliance with Group H, Division 7 Occupancy 'requirements. I .Additionally, each Group H, Division 2 Occupancy can have up to the Exempt Amounts of all hazard' categories of materials, without, having to comply with requirements other than those applicable to Group H, Division 2 Occupancy locations. I •.' . • , .• I ' • • Section A - Findings & Requirements - Eriksen-Rattan Associates Inc. • • 1/16/95-Page 150f48 ' . SCHUMACHER ENGINEERING: 1969 Palomar Oaks Way - Carlsbad, CA 92009 I HAZARDOUS MATERIALS &O'CCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION ANALYSIS With one exception compliance with Group H Division 2 Occupancy requirements will provide I , . compliance with Group H, Division 3 Occupancy'and Group H, Division 7 Occupancy requirements -- an' emergency power source is required for H-7 whereas only a standby power source is required for H-2 and H-3. Thus, the requirements addressed herein also represent compliance with Group H, Division 7 I Occupancy requirements. . , .. .' . . . .. I Group H, Division 2 Occupancy specific requirements for Storage Rooms 501 and 503 [and Storage' Rooms 502 and 505 if desired by Schumacher], are as follows: A... Location in Building and on Property: Room <I500 sf: .No specific requirements other than exterior wall/opening requirements. . Room >500 sf: 1 exterior door approved for fire department access. Room >1000 sf: >/=30' from property lines & 25% of perimeter of room On exterior building wall. I .. • Not allowed in basements. 1994 Codes:'. '. UBC 307.1.4, 307.3, 503, Table 5-A; UFC 7902.5.11.6, 8003.6.1.7, 8003.10.1.7 I B. Maximum Allowable H-2 Area: See McGraw/Baldwin Architects analysis. I . 1994 Codes: UBC 302, 504, Table 578 . . . C. Occupancy Separation: I 2-hour fire-resistive occupancy separation from 7-1 "-and separate "H-7" rooms/areas. . ', , • 1-hour fire-resistive occupancy separation from separate "H-3" rooms/areas. 1-hour fire-resistive occupancy separation between Control Areas. Room '>150 sf: >1=2-hour fire-resistive occupancy separation from all rooms/areas. I . 1994 Codes: UBC 302, 307.1.4, Table 3-B .. D. Exits: Doors to swing in direction of egress. . . . . .. Self or automatic closing doors [self closing only'where Flammable Liquids &Combustible Liquids are stored in amounts exceeding Exempt Amounts]. . . . . Rooms >1=200 sf-.'Minimum 2 exits spaced a distance apart = to 1/2 overall diagonal I . . . dimension of room. . . Maximum 75' travel distance to exit. door. . . When 2 exits required, one exit must be directly to building exterior or exit corridor. I .,' . • One exit may be through an adjoining/intervening room/area— prOvided area is not hazardous. .• Maximum 200' travel distance to exit corridor or exterior exit door. . . No lock/latch unless panic hardware provided. . Doors leading to 1-hour exit corridor: >/=45-minute rating, wired glass <1=100 si:set in - steel frames. See Item A. above. 1994'Codes: UBC 1003,. 1004, 1018, 307.1.4- Section A- Findings & Requirements. - Eriksen-Rattán Associates inc. ' . .. 1/16/95 - Page 16 of 48 1 I I I SCHUMACHER ENGINEERING 1969 Palomar Oaks Way -Car I Isbad, CA 92009 I HAZARDOUS MATERIALS & OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION ANALYSIS E. Floors: Noncombustible construction except for surfacing. Liquid-tight floors/curbs/silts 1994 Codes UBC 30722 UFC 7901 .8, 8003.1.7, 8003 118 F Spilt Control and Containment Spill Control 4 curb/recess or other method to prevent flow of liquids into adjacent areas Containment: Provisions to contain liquids within the "H-2" room or drain to a safe location the following volumes Volume of largest single container/tank; and - 20-minute fire sprinkler system discharge over area of H-2 room Also, monitoring method capable of detecting hazardous material leakage from primary containment into secondary containment also required -- visual inspection of primary containment is preferred. NOTE 4 curb/recess may be used if an approved drainage system is provided to drain required containment to a safe location outside the building The safe location must be acceptable to the Fire Department. 1994 Codes:, UBC3O7.2.2, 307.2.3, 307.2.4, 307.2.5; UFC 7902.1.8, 7902.5.11.3, Table 7902-F 8003.1.7,- 8003.12.1.2 G Maximum Allowable Amounts per Storage Room Health Hazard Materials: Unlimited Physical Hazard Materials: Hazard Classification Rack Storage Palletized/Pile Storage Combustible Liquids 11* 24,000 gIns 25,000 gIns Combustible Liquids lllA* 48,000 gIns 50,000 gIns Flammable Liquids lB* & lC* 15,000 gIns : 15,000 gins Oxidizers 3 ------------2,400,00.0 lbs per building---------- Unstable Reactives 2 Solids & Liquids------50,000 lbs per biilding---------------- Unstable Reactives 1 Not Limited Not Limited Water Reactives 3 Solids & Liquids----------------2,000 lbs per building-------------- Water Reactives 2 Solids & Liquids--------------50,000 lbs per building------- Water Reactives 1 Not Limited Not Limited *Mixed Storage in Same Pile/Rack: Limited to total for least amount aIlowëd 1994 Codes:, UBC.Table3-G; UFC 7902.5.i1.2.2, Table 7902.5-D, Table 7902.5-E, 8003.6.1.7 H Waterproof Room - Class 2 & 3 Water Reactives> Exempt Amounts [Storage Rooms 501 503] Rooms/areas used for storage of Class 2 and/or 3 Water Reactives in amounts exceeding Exempt Amounts to be constructed in a manner which resists the penetration of water through the use of waterproof materials No piping in room carrying water than approved fire sprinkler system piping. 1994 Codes: UFC 8003.10.1.4 Section A - Findings & Requirements - Eriksen-Rattan Associates Inc. 1/16/95 Page 17 of 48 SCHUMACHER ENGINEERING: 1969 Palomar Oaks Way - Carlsbad, CA 92009 I HAZARDOUS MATERIALS& OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION ANALYSIS K. Mechanical Exhaust Ventilation [HVAC System]: I . . Mechanical exhaust ventilation system, connected -to both primary power supply. and - emergency power supply. NOTE: Natural ventilation may be Used if it can be shown to be effective. I .. System to: . S . Operate continuously [supply & exhaust air]. . . Exhaust directly to the outside, without entering other-spaces/areas-in building. . . Make-up air [supply air] to ,be continuously supplied: . Minimum 1 cfm of exhaust air- per square foot of floor area or 6 air changes per hour - . - [whichever is greater]. . . . . - Exhaust air outlets to be located <1=12' from floor. - . -•, Supply air inlets to be located <1=12" below ceiling. - - . - Supply and exhaust air inlets/outlets to be so.arranged to provide cross-ventilation. I . Exhaust ducts discharging -to the atmosphere to terminate 5/=3' from property lines and building openings. - . - - - . . . Manual ventilation shutoff control: - -, -- - - - -I -- , Located outside room adjacent to access into room. - Break-glass type.switch. . . .. - . Labeled VENTILATION SYSTEM EMERGENCY SHUTOFF". . Exhaust Vent Discharge Location: -- . . . . . . - .. .. Flammable Fumes, Vapors, Dusts: - - . . .. . >/=30' from property lines - . -- . >1=10' from openings, into building.. . . >/=6' from exterior walls/roofs. . . . . >1=30' from combUstible walls or openings into building in direOtion of-exhaust. >1=10' above adjoining grade. . NOTE: Flammable vapors/fumes = concentration of flammable constituents in air .. . - >10% of lower flammable limit [LPL]. V Other:: >1=10' from property lines. . . . I . • >/=3' from exterior walls/roofs: . . • >1=10' from openings into building.. - . >1=10' above adjoining grade. I- - - 1994 Codes:- UBC 1202.2.3;UFC7902.5.11.4,8003.1.8; UMC 502, 504, 505, 507, 609.10 ., . . I . L.-' Emergency Chemical Alarm System: • - . . . . :• Approved manual emergency alarm system in "H-2" portion of building. Signal initiating device to be located outside each interior exit door of "H-2" area. I . • Activation of signal initiating device to sound local alarm to alert personnel of an emergency situation involving hazardous materials. . . System to be supervised by an approved central, proprietary or remote station service or - at constantly attended on-site location. V • 1994 Codes: UFC 8003.1.15 - . • - I . -• 'V Section A - Findings & Requirements - Eriksen-Rattan Associates Inc. 1/16/95-Page 190f48 - . SCHUMACHER ENGINEERING: 1969 Palomar Oaks Way - Carlsbad, CA 92009 'I HAZARDOUS MATERIALS & OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATIONANALYSIS.' I •0 : . :'. + 0' , M. Emergency Power System: Required to automatically supply all required electrical systems I : when normal power is interrupted for; : Mechanical exhaust ventilation system. Emergency chemical alarm system. Smoke detection system. I • 0 Sprinkler system waterfiow and valve tamper. Exit illumination. 0 0 0 Exit sign illumination: . An emergency power source is described by the National Electrical Code as a source of power that, in the event of failure of the normal supply, is available within 10 seconds of : normal power failure. The emergency power system may consist of one [i],or more of I the following as approved by the local Building Department and.FireDepartment: . . On-site storage batteries.. 0 , • On-site generator set. On-site uninterruptible power supply [UPS system]. . 0 • I . ' : . . Separate electrical service. ' 0 • .. Connection ahead of service disconnect. I ' . 1994 Codes: UBC 307.2; UFC 8003.1.13 N Hose Lines - Flammable/Combustible Liquids Storage Room Only or Storage Room/Area 0 • >2,500 sf: I . . . Class II Standpipe System. . "Hose outlets, hose lines, cabinets - as required 'by Fire Department. 500 gpm inside hose allowance . . Located such that all portions of "H-2" room are within 130' of outlet. ' I . 0 , 1994 Codes: UFC.. Table 7902.5-F/Footnote 1, Table 81-A o Portable Fire Extinguishers: Approved portable fire extinguishers. 0 Minimum 3A40BC. 0 . Inside room: 10'-50' travel distance. I . . Outside room: 10' from door opening into room. ' 0 1994 Codes! , UFC 1002, 7902.5.11.5.2 . 0 0 Explosion Control - Flammable Liquids Only: Explosion control is not required when I , continuous mechanical ventilation asset forth in Item K.' above is provided:'_ 1994 Codes: UBC 307.10; UFC 7902.1.5, 8003.1.12 0 0 Electrical: 0 Electrical wiring, equipment and device's-to be in accordance with the National Electrical 'Code. . 0 I 'dispensing . Class I electrical not required unless occurs within storage rooms. 1994 Codes: UFC 7901.4, 8003.1.3; 1993 NEC 500-5 0 I R. . Isolation - Highly Toxics [Storage Room 505/Building 2]: Highly Toxics stored in amounts 0 exceeding Exempt Amounts are required to be isolated from all other storage by one [1] of the O following: .. Storage in approved hazardous materialsstoragecabinets.. I . 0 . Storage in a separate i-hour fire-resistive' room. 0 1994 Codes: UFC 8003.12.1.4 + + I . Section A - Findings & Requirements - Eriksen-Rattan Associates Inc. 0 + + 0 + ' 1/16/95-Page2Oof48 SCHUMACHER ENGINEERING: 1969 Palomar Oaks Way.- Crlsbad, CA.92009 I ' HAZARDOUS MATERIALS & OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION ANALYSIS' ' S. Smoke Detection System - Class 3 Oxidizers [Storage I Room 501/Building 1]: 'Approved, supervised smoke detection in Class 3 Oxidizer storage room. Initiate local alarm within'storage room. 1994 Codes: UFC 8003.6.1.6 1 'Smoke & Heat Venting: Storage Rooms/Areas: Not required for "I-I" storage areas <1=2,500 sf when automatic, fire sprinkler system protection is provided. "Storage Rooms/Areas >2,500 sf and Use Rooms/Areas >15,000'sf: .. Vents fixed in open position or activated by temperature to open automatically in event of fire. I .'. Fixed Openings: Skylights or other openings which provide venting directly to exterior above plan of main roof where located. ' . Automatic Activation: At/near highest elevation of ceiling. ' No lower than upper 1/3 of smoke curtain. .' , >/=20' to adjacent property lines. I ' ' • Vent Area: >1=16 sf/vent. No dimension <4', excluding ribs/gutters whose total width does not exceed 6". Vent Spacing: <I=.1 00' on-center. I ' ' •' Vent Ratio: I sf vent to 50 sf floor area [1:50]. ,. Curtain Boards [Draft Curtains]: ,Required to subdivide building into areas </=15,000 sf when "H-3"area exceeds 15,000 sf. Construction: Sheet metal, 'asbestos, board, lath & plaster, gypsum wallboard or other approved materials - smoke-tight construction. Location & Depth: Extend down from ceiling >/=12', but no closer than 8' to floor provided curtain is >1=6' deep. Spacing: Distance between curtains not to exceed 250', with each curtained area : 5,000 sf. I ' , 1994 Codes: , UBC307.2.6, 906; UFC8003.6.1.5, 8003.9.1.4, 8003.10.1.5, Table 81-A U: Treatment Systems - Highly Toxic Liquids [Storage Room 505/Building 2]:' 'I '' • Exhaust scrubbers or other systems fOr processing of highly toxic liquid vapors to be provided for storage areas where a spill or other accidental release of such liquids can be expected to release highly toxic vapors that will not be dissipated through the 'mechanical I . exhaust. Ventilation system. Scrubbers/processing systems to be installed in accordance with Uniform Mechanical , Code. ' • Emission control to conform to requirements of local air quality authority. 1994 Codes: UFC 8003.12.1.3; UMC 505, 506, 609 V. Other: See Section, 5.0 for additional general requirements I U Section A - Findings & Requirements - Eriksen-Rattan Associates Inc. 1/16/95- Page 21of48 ' SCHUMACHER ENGINEERING: 1969 Palomar Oaks Way - Carlsbad, CA 92009 I HAZARDOUS MATERIALS & OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION ANALYSIS 4.4 Group H. Division 3 Oècupancy Requirements I Based on the Section B - Hazardous Materials Anplyèis, Schumacher's facility will require two [2] storage rooms and two [2] production areas classified as Group H, Division 3 Occupancies: A. Storage Room 502- Building 1. I B. Storage Room 505 - Building 2. . 0 I C. Chemical Production, Chemical Production & Packaging, Engineering, Glass Shop, RGA - BUilding 1/Area B. . D. Chemical Production, Research & Development, Shipping & Receiving, TEOS Expansion, I TRANS Expansion - Building 2/Area A. 1 As indicated above in Section 4.3, Storage Rooms 502 and 505 may, if desired by Schumacher, be classifiedas Group H, Division 2 Occupancies. Each Group H, Division 3 Occupancy area may also contain materials requiring classification as a Group H, Division 7 Occupancy, provided the room(s)/area(s) in which such materials are located are I constructed to meet all applicable occupancy requirements. For example: I A. Storage Room 505 contains Highly Toxics exceeding Exempt Amounts and will therefore also need compliance with Group H, Division 7 Occupancy requirements. I . B. Building 1/Area B contains Highly Toxics and Toxics exceeding Exempt Amounts and will therefore also need-compliance with Group H, Division 7 Occupancy requirements. I . C. Building 2/Area A contains Highly Toxics, Irritants, Other Health Hazards and Toxics exceeding Exempt Amounts and will therefore also need compliance with Group H, Division 7 Occupancy requirements.. I Additionally, each Group H, Division 3 Occupancy can have up to the Exempt Amounts of all hazard categories of materials, without having to comply with requirements other than those applicable to Group H, Division 3 Occupancy locations. I With one exception, compliance with Group H, Division 3 Occupancy requirements will provide compliance with Group H, Division 7 Occupancy requirements -- an emergency power source is required I for H-7, whereas only a standby power source is required for. H-3. Thus, the requirements addressed herein also represent compliance with Group H, Division 7 Occupancy requirements. I Section A- Findings & Requirements -Eriksen-Rattan Associates Inc. . 0 . 1/16/95- Page 22 of 48 0 SCHUMACHER ENGINEERING: 1969 'Palomar Oaks Way - Carlsbad, CA 92009 I HAZARDOUS MATERIALS & OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION. ANALYSIS Group H, Division 3 Occupancyspecific requirements for Storage Rooms 502 and 505, Building 1/Area B and Building 2/Area A are as follows: •.. . A. Location in Building and on Property:. [Same as Group H, Division 2 Occupancy] I . • Room V</=500 Sf: No specific requirements other than exterior wall/opening requirements. Room.>500 sf: I exterior door approved for fire department access. S Room >1,000 sf: >/=30' from property lines & 25% of perimeter of room/area on exterior building wall. . . . I . . . . ,. . Not allowed in basements. 1994 Codes: ,UBC3O7.1.4, 307.3, 503, Table 57A; UFC 7902.5.11.6, 8003:6.1.7, V . 8003.10.1.7 V V I. . . B. Maximum Allowable H-3 Area: . . See McGraw/Baldwin Architects analysis. I , 1994 Codes: UBC 302, 504, Table 5-B V V C. Occupancy Separation: .V o. 1-hour fire-resistive occupancy separation from "F-1", "H-2" and separate "H-7" I rooms/areas. V . 1-hour fire-resistive occupancy separation between Control Areas. . V . Room >150 sf: >1=2-hour fire-resistive occupancy -separation from all rooms/areas.- 1994 Codes: UBC 302, 307.1.4, Table 3-B V V V V P. Exits: [Same as Group H, Division 2 Occupancy] , V . V V V • V Doors to swing in direction of egress. V V V V• Self or automatic closing doors [self closing only where Flammable Liquids & Combustible,,V V V Liquids are stored in amounts exceeding Exempt Amounts]. V Rooms >/=200 Sf: Minimum 2 exits spaceda distance apart = to 1/2 overall diagonal V V V V • dimension of room. V V V V V V V V o Maximum 75' travel distance to exit door: • , V V V • V When 2 exits required, one exit mustVbe directly to building exterior or exit,corridor. . V I V 'One exit may be through an adjoining/intervening room/area-- provided area is not ' V hazardous. V • Maximum 200' travel distance to exit corridor or exterior exit door. I V V ' •' No lock/latch unless panichárdware provided. V Doors leading to 1-hourexit corridor: >/45-minute rating, wired glass /=i00 si set in V steel frames. .I ' V •VVV See Item A. above. 199.4 Codes: VV , UBC'1003, 1004, 1018,,307.1.4 E. Floors: [Same as Group H, Division 2 Occupancy]' I V ' • Noncombustible construction except-for surfacing. V V V V V , ' • V Liquid-tight floors/curbs/sills. V ' 1994 Codes: V UBC 307.2.2; UFC 7901.8, 8003.1.7, 8003.1.18 V V I Section A - Findings & Requirements - Eriksen-Rattan Associates Inc. 1/16/95 - Page 23 of 48 SCHUMACHER ENGINEERING: .1969 Palomar Oaks Way - Carlsbad, CA 92009 I HAZARDOUS MATERIALS '& OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION ANALYSIS F. Spill Control and Containment: . .. I . . Storage: Required for storage >Exempt Amounts [Same as GróupH; Division 2 Occupancy]' .. . • .,,•. .. . . . . . . Spill COntrol: 4" curb/recess; or other method to prevent flow of liquids into adjacent I .. areas. . . . . . . Containment Provisions to contain liquids within the H-3 room or drain to a safe location the following volumes Volume of largest single container/tank; and; . . .. . . . I.:.. . - . . 20-minute fire sprinkler system discharge over area of "H-3" room. . Also, monitoring method capable of detecting hazrdous material leakage from - . . primary containment into.secondary containment also required— visual inspection .I . .• of pnmary containment is preferred . . . . . Use Required under the following conditions only Use-Open System: ... . . . . .I • . . • Spill Control: Dispensing into containers >1-gallon capacity or use in containers/systems >5-gallon capacity. ,. . . Containment Individual containers >55 gallons or aggregate amount >100 I ... gallons, Same provisions as required for storage. . . . •. . Use-Closed System:, . . . . ,. . s Spill.Control: Use in containers/systems >55-gallon capacity. I.. . . . Containmert: Aggregate amount in use >1,000 gallons. . Same provisions as required for storage. . . . . NOTE 4 curb/recess may be used if an approved drainage system is provided to drain I . required containment-to a safe location outside the building. The"safe location" must be •• acceptable to the Fire Department. . .. . . 1994 Codes: UBC3O7.2.2, 307.2.3, 307.2.4, 307.2.5; UFC 7902.1.8, 7902.5.113, . . . Table 7902-F, 8003.1.7, 80Q3J2.1., 8004.2.2.5,'8004.2.3.6 I I I I -I ,- 0 •• . 0 -, I I.. .. . Section A - Findings & Requirements - Eriksen-Rattan Associates Inc. 1/16/95-Page 24 of 48 :. SCHUMACHER ENGINEERING: 1969 Palomar Oaks Way - Carlsbad, CA .92009 I HAZARDOUS MATERIALS & OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION ANALYSIS I . : G. Maximum Allowable AmOunts per Storage Room or Individual Area: [Same as Group K. I Division 2 Occupancy except additional hazard categories appear in the Group H Division 3 Occupancy areas] .. . . . . NOTE.: The amount of Flammable and,Combüstible Liquids in, use in any individual room I . cannot exceed the amount allowed for storage. . S. Health. Hazard Materials: . Unlimited . . -• -,. . . . . . . •• Physical Hazard Materials:. . . . . .I . Hazard Classification . Rack Storage Palletized/Pile Stprage . . . Combustible Liquids 11* 24,0.00 gins, 25,000 gins . . Combustible Liquids lIlA* 48,000 'gins' . 50,000 gins Flammable Gases ... . - . -5/=Exempt Amounts . Flammable Liquids lB* & lC* 15,000 gIns . 15,000 gins, Flammable Solids . Not Limited. - .. Not Limited - Oxidizers.3** . . 2,400,000lbs per building Oxidizers I . Not Limited Not Limited Oxidizer Gas I . . . <I=Exempt Amounts Pyrophoric Solids & Liquids** Not Limited •• Not Limited I .. Unstable Reactives 3 Solids & Liquids** 2,000 lbs per building .. . . Unstable Reactives.2 Solids & Liquids 50,000 lbs per, building Unstable Reactives I Not Limited Not Limited Water Reactives 3Solids.& Liquids . 2,000 lbs per building I . Water Reactives 2 Solids& Liquids—'-50,000 lbs per building-_______ Water Reactives 1 Not Limited . Not Limited *Mixed Storage in Same Pile/Rack: Limited.to total for least amount allowed. I . . **Additional controls may .be required for storage/use of materials in amounts exceeding those indicated in Section B - Hazardous Materials Analysis. . . 1994 Codes: UBC Table 3-D, Table 3E, Table 3-G; UFC 7902.5.11.2.21 . Table 7902.5-D, Table 7902.5-E, 8003.6.1.7, Table 8001.137A, I . . . Table 8001.13-B . . H. • Waterproof Room - Class 2 Water Reactives> Exempt Amounts: [Same as Group H, Division 2 Occupancy] Rooms/areas where Class 2 Water Reactives exceed Exempt Amounts to be constructed in a manner which resists the penetration of water through the use of waterproof I .. materials. . .• • . No piping in room carrying water than approved fire sprinkler system piping. . • 1994 Codes: - UFC 8003.10.1.4 . . . I I I I - I . . • Section A - Findings & Requirements - Eriksen-Rattan Assoiates Inc. • . . 1/16/95 - Page 25 of 48 • 0 0 • • SCHUMACHER ENGINEERING: 1969 Palomar Oaks Way-. Carlsbad, CA' 92009' HAZARDOUS MATERIALS& OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION ANALYSIS' K. Mechanical Exhaust Ventilation [HVAC System]: . General/Area Exhaust Ventilation: [Same as Group H, Division 2 OOcupancy] • . ' Mechanical exhaust ventilation system, connected to both primary power supply and emergency power supply. 'NOTE: Natural ventilation may be used if it can be. shown to be effective. .' System to: Operate continuously [supply & exhaust air] ' Exhaust directly to the outside, without entering other spaces/areas' in building. Make-up 'air [supply air] to be continuously supplied. '•Minimum I cfm of exhaust air, per square foot of floor area or-6 air changes per hour, [whichever is greater].,' I Exhaust air outlets-to be lOcated </=12" from floor. Supply air inlets to- be located </=12".below ceiling. '.. . Supply and exhaust, air inlets/outlets to be so arranged to provide cross-ventilation. I .. Exhaust ducts discharging to the atmosphere to terminate >/=3' from property lines • . . . ,. and building openings.. . . . ... Manual ventilation shutOff control: Located outside room adjacent to access into room. I . Break-glass type switch. , Labeled "VENTILATION SYSTEM EMERGENCY SHUTOFF". I Local Exhaust Ventilation: Rooms, areas or spaces where corrosive, combustible, , flammable', highly toxic dusts, fumes, vapors or gases are or may be emitted due to processing or use shall be provided with local exhaust ventilation to capture dusts, fumes, vapors, gases at the point, of generation -- i.e.: fume hoods, exhausted enclosures, etc. I . Exhaust Vent Discharge LOcation: . Flammable Fumes, Vapors, Dusts: >/=30' from property lines . >/=10' from openings into building. I . >1=6' from exterior walls/roofs. . >/=30' from combustible walls or openings into building in direction Of exhaust. I . >/=10'. above adjoining grade.' NOTE: Flammable vapors/fumes= concentration of flammable constituents in air >10% of lower flammable limit [LPL]. . Other: I . . >/=10' from property lines. >/=3' from exterior. walls/roofs. . . >/=10' from openings into building. . >/=10' above adjoining grade. 1994 Codes: UBC 1202.2.3; UEC 7902.5.11.4, 8003.1.8; UMC 502, 504, 505, 507,. 609.10 I L. Emergency Chemical Alarm System: [Same as Group H, Division 2 Occupancy] Approved manual emergency alarm system in "H-3" portion of building. Signal initiating 'device to be located outside each interior exit door of "1-1-3" area.. I . 'Activation of signal initiating device to sound local alarm to alert personnel of an 'emergency situation involving hazardous materials. System to be supervised by an approved central, proprietary or remote. station service or: at constantly attended on-site location. I . 1994 Codes: UFC8003.1.15 . 1 . Section A - Findings & Requirements - Eriksen-Rattan Associates Inc. 1/16/95 - Page 27 of 48 • SCHUMACHER ENGINEERING 1969 Palomar Oaks Way - Carlsbad, CA 92009 I HAZARDOUS MATERIALS & OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION ANALYSIS i. :. M Emergency Power System [Same as Group H Division 2 Occupancy] I S Required to automatically supply all required electrical systems when normal power is interrupted.for: Mechanical exhaust ventilation systems.. I .. . •. • Emergency chemical alarm system. .: . • . Limit controls. . . Treatment systems. . . . Sprinkler system wate1low and valve tamper; . .' U . Exit illumination s Exit sign illumination. . . . . . . . An emergency power source.is described by the National Electrical Code as a source of .I . power that, in the event of failure, of.. the. normal supply, is available within 10 seconds of - . . . normal power failure. The emergency power system may consist of one [1] or more of the following as approved by the local Building Department and FireDepartment: .. . I .. •• .On-site storage batteries. . . s . On-site generator set. . On-site uninterruptible power supply [UPS system]. I . . S • Separate electrical service. . . . .S S • Connection ahead of service disconnect. . . 1994 Codes: . UBC 307.2; UFC. 8003.1.13 I . N. Hose Lines - Flammable/Combustible Liquids Storage Room Only or Storage Room/Area S >2,500sf: [Same as Group H, Division 2 Occupancy] . Class II Standpipe System. Hose outlets, hose lines, càbiñets -- as required by Fire Department. 500 gprn inside hose allowance . . . .. Located such that all portions of "1-1-2" room are within 130' of outlet. .: 1994 Codes:. UFC Table 7902;5-F/Footnote 1 Table 81-A 0. Portable Fire Extinguishers: [Same as Group H, Division 2 Occupancy]. Approved portable fire extinguishers. .. .. . . Minimum 3A4OBC. . S lnside.room: 10'-SO' travel distance. Outside room: 10' from door opening into room. I .1994 Codes: UFC 1002, 7902.5.11.5.2 . . R Explosion Control - Flammable Liquids Only: Explosion control is not required: S • When continuous mechanical ventilation as set forth in Item K. above is provided; or Where process vessels are designed to fully contain the worst-case explosion anticipated S S with the vessel under process conditions considering the most likely failure: 1994 Codes: UBC 307.10; UFC 7902.1.5, 7903.2.3.4.3,-7903.2.3.5.2, 8003.1.12, 8004.2.2.4, 8004.2.3.5 . . -. . . - • S I :. . .. S • •• - S . , - .- Section A .I • . . . . . • - Findings & Requirements '- Eriksen-Rattan Associates inc. . '1/16/95-Page28of48 . . S • SCHUMACHER ENGINEERING: 1969.Palomar Oaks Way - Carlsbad, CA92009 . HAZARDOUS MATERIALS & OCCUPANCY CLASS IFICATIO.N ANALYSIS I V V Electrical: .. . I •V Electrical wiring, equipment and devices to be in accordance with the National Electrical V V V Code. V Storage Rooms: Class I electrical not required for storage rooms unless dispensing U i occurs within the rooms. V V V V . Use Areas: Class 1, Division I electrical where flammable liquids are used. in the use-opensystem V condition. :. V I V V • Class I, DivisiOn 2 electrical where flammable liquids are used in the use-closed V V system condition. V V 1994 Codes: UFC 7901.4, 8003.1.3; 1993 NEC 500-5 V V R. Highly Toxics [Storage Room 505/Building 2]: [Same as Gfoup H, DivisiOn 2 Occupancy] V Highly Toxics stored in amounts exceeding Exempt Amounts are required to be isolated from I all other storage by one [1] of the following: V V V • Storage in approved hazardous materials storage cabinets. Storage in a separate 1-hour fire-resistive room. V V I 1994 Codes: UFC 80Q3.12. 1.4 V V V V S Smoke &. Heat Venting: [Same as Group H, Division 2 Occupancy] V Storage Rooms/Areas: Not required for "H" storage areas </=2,500 sf when automatic V I .fire sprinkler system protection is provided: V V V V • Storage Rooms/Areas >2,500 sf and Use Rooms/Areas >15,000 sf: V Vents fixed in open position or activated by temperature to open automatically in .I V event of fire S . Fixed Openings: Skylights or other openings which provide venting directly to exterior above plan of main roof where located. I V . V • Automatic Activation: At/near highest elevation of ceiling; No lower than upper 1/3 of smoke curtain. V • >1=20' to adjacent property lines.. . V I .. • Vent Area: V V V . >/=16 sf/vent. . V. V • No dimension <4', excluding ribs/gutters whose total width does not exceed 6". I .. • Vent Spacing: <1=100' on-center. . Vent Ratio: 1 sf vent to 50 sf floor area [1:50]. V. Curtain Boards [Draft Curtains]: . . V. . I . . Required to subdivide building into areas </=15,000 sf when "H-3" area exceeds V 15,000 sf. V V V • Construction: Sheet metal, asbestos, board, lath & plaster, gypsum wallboard or V other, approved materials -- smoke-tight construction. . . I • Location & Depth: Extend down from ceiling >1=12', but no closer than 8' to floor, S. . provided curtain is >/=6' deep. . . . Spacing: Distance between curtains not to exceed 250', with each curtained area . . >/=15,000 sf, I 1994 Codes: UBC 307.2.6, 906; UFC 8003.6.1.5, 8003.9.1.4, 8003.10.1.5, Table 81-A 1 V • . :.. :, .. V. I. Section A - Findings & Requirements - Eriksen-Rattan Associates Inc. V S 1/16/95- Page 29 of 48 SCHUMACHER ENGINEERING:' 1969 Palomar Oaks Way-Carlsbad, CA 92009 1 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS & OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION ANALYSIS :1 .. T. Limit Controls: . I . High Level: Open tanks equipped with liquid level limit control or other means to prevent overfilling of tank. . . . . Low Level: Open tanks and containers in whichmaterials are heated to be equippedwith. I . approved automatic shutoff controls which will sense low liquid levels and shut off source of heat. . . . . . . Temperature: Process tanks/equipment which involve temperature control of materials to I .. be provided with limit controls to maintain temperature- within a safe range. Pressure: . Stationary tanks and equipment containing materials which can generate pressures exceeding the tank/equipment design limits due to fire exposure or internal reaction to I . . be eqUipped with pressure-limiting or relief devices. . Relief devices for tanks/equipment for highly toxic, toxic or corrosive materials to vent to an exhaust scrubber or. treatment system for processing vapors/gases. I . • Relief devices for flammable/explosive vapors/gases to vent to an approved location. Vent Discharge. Location: - Flammable Fumes, Vapors, Dusts: I . >1=30' from property lines. >/=10' from openings into building. >1=6 from exterior walls/roofs. . . . . >/=30' from combustible walls or openings into building in direction of exhaust. I .>1=10' above adjoining grade. NOTE: Flammable vapors/fumes = concentration of flammable constituents in air. >10% of lower flammable limit [LPL]. . . .. Other: >1=10' from property lines. . >1=3 from exterior walls/roofs. I . >1=10' from openings into building. S. >/=10' above adjoining grade. 1994 Codes: UFC 8004.1.6; UMC 502, 609.10 I U. Treatment Systems - Highly Toxic Liquids [Storage Room 505/Building 2, Area A/Building 21: [Same as Group H, Division 2 Occupancy] . Exhaust scrubbers or other systems fdr processing of highly toxic liquid vaporsto be I provided for storage areas where a spill or other accidental release of such liquids can be expected to release highly toxic vapors thatwill ndt be dissipated through the mechanical exhaust ventilation system I .. Scrubbers/processing systems to be installed in accordance with Uniform Mechanical Code. .. Emission control to conform to requirements of local air quality authority. 1 . 1994 Codes: UFC 8003.12.1.3; UMC 505, 506, 609 V. Other: See Section 5.0 for additional general requirements I . . . I .S. Section A - Findings & Requirements - Eriksen-Rattan Associates Inc . . 1/16/95 - Page 30 of 48. . * SCHUMACHER ENGINEERING,: 1969 Palomar Oaks Way - C" CA 92009 I HAZARDOUS MATERIALS & OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION ANALYSIS 4 5 Group H Division 7 Occupancy Requirements Based on the Section B - Hazardous Matenals Analysis Schumacher 's facility will require two [2] storage rooms and three [3] production areas classified as Group H, Division 7 Occupancies A Quality Assurance Research & Development Expansion',- Building 1/Area A I B Storage Room 501 - Building I - previously addressed in Section 4 3 I C Storage Room 505 - Building 2 -- previously addressed in Sections 4 3 and 4.4. D Chemical Production Chemical Production ,& Packaging Engineering Glass Shop RGA - I .. ' Building 1/Area B,_ previously addressed in' Section 4.4. E Chemical Production Research & Development Shipping & Receiving TEOS Expansion TRANS Expansion - Building 2/Area A - previously addressed in,* ection 4.4. . . Each Group H, Division 7 Occupancy can have up to the Exempt Amounts of all hazard categories of, I materials, without having to comply with requirements other than those applicable to Group H Division 7 Occupancy locations. Additionally, as indicated in Sections 4.3 and 4.4, each Group H, 'Division 2 and 3 Occupancy area may also.. contain materials, requiring classification' as, a Group H, ,Division 7 Occupancy, provided the, I room(s)/area(s) in which such materials are located are constructed to meet all applicable occupancy requirements. Group H, Division 7 Occupancy specific requirements for Building 1/Area A are as follows [the other "H-7" areas have been addressed in Sections 4.3 and 4 4] I I 1. I ' • ' ' ** Section A - Findings & Requirements -Eriksen-Rattan Associates inc. 0 * 1/16/95-Page 31.of 48 * , 0 • ' ' ' SCHUMACHER ENGINEERING 1969 Palomar Oaks Way - Carlsbad, CA 92009 I HAZARDOUS MATERIALS & OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION ANALYSIS A Location in Building and on Property No Specific, requirements other than exterior wall/opening requirements. 1 1994 Codes UBC 3073 503 Table 5-A B Maximum Allowable H-7 Area I . See McGraw/Baldwin Architects analysis = 1994 Codes: UBC 302, 504; Table &B ,. : 1 C. Occupancy. Separation: fire-resistive. Occupancy. separation from "F-I" and separate "H 73" - . 2-hour fire-resistive occupancy separation frorn'separate "H-2" rooms/areas. . . .1-hour fire-resistive occupancyseparation between Control Areas. 1 1994 Codes UBC 302 Table 3-B D Exits I . Exits: Doors to swing in direction of egress. . . Self or automatic closing doors Rooms >/=200 sf: Minimum 2 exits spaced a distance apart = to 1/2 overall diagonal dimension of room. . Maximum 100' travel distance to exit door. . . When 2 exits required, one exit must be directly to building exterior or exit corridor. One exit may be through an adjoining/intervening room/area— provided area is not hazardous. • . Maximum 200' travel distance to exit corridor or exterior exit door. . ,• . Doors leading to 1-hour exit corridor: >/=45-minute rating, wired glass </=100 si set in I . steel frames. . .• See Item A. above. . •. • 1994 Codes: . UBC 1003, 1004, 1018,.307.1.4:,.,.. J • E. Floors: [Same as Group H, Division 2/3 Occupancies] • . Noncombustible construction except for surfacing. . •. •, Liquid-tight floors/curbs/sills. . . • . • •• 1994 Codes: UBC .307.112.2; UFC 8003.1.7, 8003.1.18 I Section I.;.:.; 1 I I • • . •.. ,. • U . • . • A - Findings & Requirements - Eriksen-Rattan Associates Inc. 1/16/95-Page32of48.. . SCHUMACHER ENGINEERING: 1969 Palomar Oaks Way - Carlsbad, CA92009 I HAZARDOUS MATERIALS & OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION ANALYSIS 1: H .F Spill Control and Containment: [Same as. Group H, Division 3 Occupancy] I . Storage: Required for storage >Exempt Amounts:. Spill Control 4" curb/recess,,-6r other method to prevent flow of liquids into adjacent areas. V I . Containment Provisions to contain liquids within the H-7 room/area or drain to a safe location the following volumes: V I . Volume of largest single container/tank, and I . 20-minute fire sprinkler system discharge over area of "1-1-7 room/area Also, rnonitoring.method capable of detecting hazardous material leakage from V V V V primary containment into secondary containment also required --visual inspection of primary containment is preferred if V V • Use: Required under the following conditions only: Use-Open System: V , V V VV V • Spill Control: Dispensing into containers >1-gallon capacity or use in I V V V V containers/systems >5-gallon capacity. V V V V V V V V V V • Containment: Individual containers >55 gallons or aggregate amount >100 V V V V gallons. V V V V V V V V , V • Same provisions as required for storage. V V V V V Use-Closed System: V • Spill Control: Use in containers/systems >55-gallon capacity. V V V V V V V • Containment: Aggregate amount in use >1,000 gallons. I V V V Same provisions as required for stbrage... V V V V V V V ,VNOTE: 4" curb/recess may be used if an approved drainage system is provided to drain: V V V - V V required containment to a safe location outside the building. The "safe location" must be acceptable to the Fire Department. V 1994 Codes: UBC 307.2.2, 307.2.3, 307.2.4, 307.2.5; UFC 7902.1.8, 7902.5.11.3, V V - V V Table 79Q2-F, 8003.1.7, 8003.12.1.2, 8004.2.2.5, 8004.2.3.6 V 1 G Maximum Allowable Amounts per Storage Room or Individual Area . Health Hazard Materials Unlimited V V Physical Hazard Materials:' V <I=Exempt Amounts V V V V V I .V 1994-Codes: V V UBCV Table 3-D, Table 3-E,. Table 3-G; UFC Table 8001.13-A, V V V V V Table 8001.13-B V V V V V V H. Storage Arrangement: Aisles - dependent on storage method: . >/=4' between portable tanks V V •V V V V V V • >/=4'•to exits V V V V V I . . >/1/2 pile height V V V V V • Dead-ends </=20' V V V V V V V V " 1994 Codes: UBC 1014 1' I V IV V V V Section A - Findings & Requirements -'Eriksen-Rattan Associates Inc. V VV V 1/16/95 - Page 33 of48 V • V -4 I I SCHUMACHER ENGINEERING 1969 Palomar Oaks Way -Carlsbad,. CA 92009 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS .& OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION ANALYSIS J. Mechanical Exhaust Ventilation [HVAC System]: General/Area Exhaust Ventilation: [Same as Group H, Division 2/3 Occupancies] Mechanical exhaust ventilation system, connected to both primary power supply and emergency power supply. NOTE Natural ventilation may be used if it can be shown to be effective System to: Operate continuously [supply & exhaust air] o Exhaust directly to the outside, without entering other spaces/areas in building. Make-up air [supply air] to be continuously supplied. Minimum 1 cfm of exhaust air per square foot of floor area or 6 air changes per hour [whichever is greater] Exhaust air outlets to be located </=12 from floor. Supply air inlets to be located </=12" below ceiling. Supply and exhaust air, inlets/outlets to be so arranged to provide cross-ventilation. Exhaust ducts discharging to the atmosphere to terminate >/=3' from property lines and building openings. Manual ventilation shutoff control: . Located outside room adjacent to access into room. Break-glass type switch. Labeled "VENTILATION SYSTEM EMERGENCY SHUTOFF". Local Exhaust Ventilation: [Same as Group H, Division 3 Occupancy] Rooms, areas or spaces where corrosive, combustible, flammable, highly toxic dusts, fumes, vapors or gases are or may be emitted due to processing or use shall be provided With local exhaust 'ventilation to capture dusts, fumes, vapors, gases at the point of generation -- i.e.: fume hoods, exhausted enclosures, etc. Exhaust Vent Discharge Location: [Same as Group H, Division 3 Occupancy] Flammable Fumes, Vapors, Dusts: >/=30' from property lines. >/=10' from openings into' building. ' . >/=6' from exterior walls/roofs. >/=30' from combustible walls or openings into-building in direction of exhaust. >/=10' above adjoining grade. NOTE Flammable vapors/fumes = concentration of flammable constituents in air >10% of lowerflammable limit [LPL]. Other: >/=10' from property lines-. >/=3' from exterior walls/roofs. >/=10' from openings into building. >/=10' above adjoining grade. 1994 Codes: UBC 1202.2.3; UFC 7902.5.11.4, 8003.1.8; UMC 502,504, 505, 507, 609.10 '. K. Emergency Chemical Alarm System: [Same as Group H, Division 2/3 Occupancies] 'Approved manual emergency alarm system in "H-3" portion of building. Signal initiating device to be located outside each interior exit door of "H-3" area. Activation of signal initiating device to sound local alarm to alert personnel of an emergency situation involving hazardous materials. System to be supervised by an approved.central, proprietary or'remote:station service or at constantly attended on-site location; 1994 Codes: UFC 8003.1.15 ' Section A - Findings & Requirements Eriksen-Rattan Associates inc. 1/16/95 - Page 35 of 48 I I I - SCHUMACHER ENGINEERING: 1969 Palomar Oaks4Way - Carlsbad; CA 92009 . MATERIALS & OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION ANALYSIS I HAZARDOUS N L Emergency Power System [Same as Group-H, Division 2/3 Occupancies] Required to automatically' supply all required e!e'ctrical systems when ndrmal power. is I interrupted .for: - - - - • ,Mech'anical exhaust ventilation systems. Emergency chemical alarm system Limit controls ? Treatment systems Sprinkler system watérflow and valve tamper. . S Exit illumination It* '.,Exit sign illumination. An emergency ppwer.,.sourcel is described by the National Electrical Code as a source of power that, in the event of failure of the normal supply, is available within 10S econds of, normal power failure. The emergency power system, may consist of one [1]or more of ' - the following as approved by the local Building Department and Fire Department On-site storage batteries. S -• On-site generator set:- .- ' - -• . On-site uninterrutible power supply [UPS system].- Separate electrical service - I . Connection ahead of service disconnect. ' S S - 1994Codes: UBC 307.2; UFC 8003.1.1-3 I M Hose Lines -- High-Combustible Storage Only & Area >12,000 sf [Same as Group H -Division 2/30ccupanc1és] Class II Standpipe System.:.' - L ' -- • Hose outlets, hose lines, cabinets - asrequired b' Fire Department. -. - 500 gpm inside hose allowance' - Located such that all portions of H-7 high-piled combustible storage room/area are within 130 of outlet. I ' 1994 Codes: UFC-Table 81-A ..'. N. 'Portable Fire Extinguishers: [Same as Group H, Division 2/3 Occupancies] Approved portable fire extinguishers. - Minimum 3A40BC: ' -- -,- -- - - -- - . - - - • Inside room: 10'-50' travel distance. I - - -. • Outside room: 10' from door opening into room. S - . - - 1994 Codes: UFC. 1002, 7902.5.11.5.2 - ' -- •- ' -: ' -- S I - 0. Explosion Control --Flarmable Liquids Only: [Same as Group H, Division3 Occupancy] Explosion control is not required When continuous mechanical Ventilation as set forth in Item K above is provided;or - - - - . Where process vessels are designed to fully contain the worst-case explosion-anticipates S with the vessel under process conditions consideringthe most likely failure.- * - 1994 Codes: - UBC 307.10; UFC-7902.1.5, 7903.2.3.4.3, 7903.2.3.5.2, 8003.1.12, '. 8004224 8004235 4 ,- * ' Section A - Findings& Requirements - Eriksen-Rattan Associates Inc. -. -. 1/16/95 Page36of48 I'. U - •I U .. - . - U - U SCHUMACHER ENGINEERING: 1969 Palomar Oaks Way - Carlsbad, CA 92009 I HAZARDOUS MATERIALS & OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION ANALYSIS 'I P. Electrical: [Same as Group H, Divisio'n 2/3 Occupancies'for storage.] .0 I .Electrical wiring, equipment and devices to be in accordance with the Natiohal EIeätricaI U Code. Storage Rooms Class I electrical not required for storage rooms unless dispensing 'occurs within the rooms V • .. Use Areas: .- U • II U Class I Division I electrical where flammable liquids are used in the use-open system condition • I . .. Class I; Division 2 electrical where flammable liquids are used in the use-closed . * system condition. 4. . .. U 1994 Codes: UFC 7901.4, 8003.1.3,-,1993 NEC 500-5 U - .•1IU - . ,-. . - . . r •' - . - U I Q Highly Toxics [Storage Room 505/Building 2] [Same as Group H Division 2 Occupancy] Highly Toxics stored in amounts exceeding Exempt Amounts are required to be isolated from ' all other storage by one [1] of the following • Storage in approved haiardous materials' storage cabinets. ' U • Storage in .a separate 1-hour fire-resistive room I.. . 1.994 Codes: UFC.8003: 12. -14 R Smoke & Heat Venting [Same as Group H Division 213 Occupancies] I:. . Storage Rooms/Areas: Not required for "H" storage, areas <1=2,500 sf when automatic ' U U U fire sprinkler system protection is provided. . . . . . . Storage Rooms/Areas >2,500,sf and Use Rooms/Areas >15,000 sf: . . Vents fixed in open position or activated by temperature to open automatically in event of fire. 1 •- U • -Fixed Openings: Skylights or other openings which provide venting directly ,to- exterior U U U U above plan of main roof where located. Automatic Activation: • : . U • U .- At/near highest elevation of ceiling. . No lower than upper 1/3 of smoke curtain. >1=20' to adjacent property lines. . . • I • Vent Area: U . >1= 16 sf/vent. '. . . . U . No dimension-' <4', excluding '1bsIgutters whose total width does not exceed 6".. I . •-. • Vent-Spacing: <i=100' oncenter. . . U Vent Ratio: 1 sf vent to 50-sf floor'area [1:50].,,• - U. . U • - Curtain Boards [Draft Curtains]: Require'dtôsubdividebuildirig into areas <1=15,000-sf when "H-T' area exceeds U 15,000 sf.. U • Construction: Sheet metall asbestos', board, lath & plaster, gypsum wallboard or U U I other approved materials -- smoke-tight construction '. Location & Depth: Extend dOwn from ceiling >1=12',- but no closer than 8' to floor -. U provided curtain is >1=6' deep.' . .*• . - U - ' - U • Spacing:- Distance between curtains not to exceed 250', with each curtained area >/=15,000 'sf U 1994 Codes: U8C307.2:6, 906;UFC 8003.6.15, 8003.9.1.4, 8003.10.1.5,.TabIe 81-A - r .I. . . 4Section A - Findings & Requirements - Eriksen-Rattan Associates inc. U . . 1/16/95-.Page37of48 U •U U' SCHUMACHER ENGINEERING: 1969 Palomar Oaks'.Way - Carlsbad, CA 92009 I HAZARDOUS MATERIALS & OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION ANALYSIS -. . S. Limit Controls: . . . . . I . High Level: Open tanks equipped with liquid level limit control or other means to prevent overfilling of tank. . . '. . Low Level: Open tanks and containers in which materials are heated to be equipped-wit h I . approved automatic shutoff controls which will sense low liquid levels and shutoff source of heat. . . . . Temperature: Process tanks/equipment which involve temperature control of materials to - . be provided with limit controls, to maintain temperature within .a' safe range. Pressure: .. , Stationary tanks and equipment containing materials which can generate pressures exceeding the tank/equipment design limits due to fire exposure or internal reaction to be equipped with pressure-limiting or relief devices. k . • Relief devices for tanks/equipment for highly toxic, toxic or corrosive materials to vent to an exhaust scrubber or treatment system for processing vapors/gases. .' . Relief devices for flammable/explosive vapors/gases to vent to an approved location. Vent Discharge Location: Flammable Fumes, Vapors, Dusts: . . . . I I . . . >/=30' from property lines. >/=10' from openings into building. . . >/=6' from exterior walls/roofs. . •1. I ........................>/=30' from combustible walls or openings into building in direction ofexhaust. .. . >/=10 above adjoining grade. NOT 'E: Flammable vapors/fumes = concentration of flammable constituents in air >10% Of lower flammable limit [LPL]. Other: - , >/=10' from properly lines. >/=3' from exterior walls/roofs. ' >1=10' from openings into building. >/=1O' above adjoining grade. ' • 1994 Codes: UFC 8004.1.6; UMC 502, 609.10 - ' T. 'Treatment Systems - Highly Toxic Liquids [Storage Room 505/Building 2, Area A/Building 2]: [Same as Group H, Division 2 Occupancy] Exhaust scrubbers or'other systems for processing of highly toxic liquid vapors to be. I provided for storage/use areas where a spill or othe'r accidental release of such liquids can be expected to release highly toxic vapors that will not be dissipated through,the' mechanical exhaust ventilation system. Scrubbers/processing 'systems to be installed in accordance'-with Uniform 'Mechanical Code. Emission ,control to conform to requirements of local air quality, authority. S 1994 Codes: ' UFC 8003.12.1.3; UMC 505, 506, 609 1 , U. Other: See Section 5.0 for additional general requirements • . I' • . . • . ... -' . '. • H1 •' .. ' ' H • • •," Section A - Findings & Requirements - Eriksen-Ratthn Associates Inc. • ' S 1/16/95 - Page 38 of 48 • SCHUMACHER ENGINEERING: 1969 Palo 'Mar Oaks Way - Carlsbad, CA 92009 1 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS & OCCUPANCY. CLASSIFICATION- ANALYSIS I 5.0 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS :. .• The following itemization summarizes general requirements from the 1994 editions of the Uniform Building and Fire Codes applicable to the storage and use of hazardous materials -- regardless of occupancy classification. Where requirements are duplicated between the Uniform Building Code and Uniform Fire I Code or within the Codes, only one [1] Code section reference may be indicated. Where applicable, references to the Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and CAL-OSHA may be noted. Verification of compliance with the requirements indicated is outside the scope of this report. S A. Seismic Requirements: Seismic bracing/protection for:. Racks/shelves >8' high. I . Machinery, and equipment utilizing hazardous materials. 0 1994 Codes: UBC Table 16-B; UFC8003.1.4, 8004.1.10 B. Storage of Individual Containers on Racks/Shelves: Lips/guards to prevent accidental I dislodgment of containers: •. 0 1994 Codes: UFC 8003.1.4 0 0 C Hazardous Materials Storage Cabinets Storage cabinets used for storage of hazardous 0 •• materials other than Flammable and Combustible Liquids are required to be in accordance with the following: 0 0 0 . Doors: 0 • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 0 s Well fitted. 0 0 • : 0 0 0 • Self-closing. • 0 • • 0 0 0 0 • • Self-latching. I -. 0 • Construction: Either "listed" for the materials stored or in accordance with the following: 0 0 0 • 18-gage steel. 0 0 0 0 0 • 00 Double-walled [including door] with 1.5" airspace between walls. 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 Riveted or welded tight fitting joints: 0 0 0 0 0 0 Non-reactive materials of construction - or treated/coated 0 0 0 . Labeled: HAZARDOUS'- KEEP FIRE AWAY - red letters on 0 0 I 0.0 • 0 contrasting background. 0 • • 0 1994 Codes: UFC8003. 1:10 0 • 0 •• 1 .0 •• ••• '0 • ,:. . I .1 0 0 • 0 • 0 ••••• 0 I 0 • Seëtion A - Findings & Requirements - Eriksen-Rattan Associates Inc. 0 0 1/16/95-Page 39 of 48 0 0 • • 0 0 0 SCHUMACHER ENGINEERING: 1969 Palomar Oaks Way - Carlsbad, CA 92009 I HAZARDOUS MATERIALS & OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION ANALYSIS D Flammable/Combustible Liquids Storage Cabinets Storage cabinets used for storage of Flammable/Combustible Liquids are required to be in accordance with the following: I . . Maximum Amounts per Cabinet: . . . ' .. Class 'I & II Liquids: 60 gallons Class Ill Liquids: 120 gallons .. I . Doors . " . Well fitted.. Self-closing."'.. . . I .. .' Self-latching. -. . Construction:' Either "listed" for flammable/combustible liquids storage or in accordance with the following: . Metal Cabinets . •. '' . 18-gage steel. . . :1 •. Double-walled [including door]with 1.5" airspace between walls. ' . . . . Riveted or welded tight fitting joints. I . . Bottom: Liquid tight to a height of >/=2". . •. . •.. ' Labeled: FLAMMABLE -, KEEP FIRE AWAY - red letters - contrasting background. . . . . . . I .. Wood Cabinets 1" exterior grade plywood.. Joints rabbeted and fastened in 2 directions with wood screws. Steel or brass dàor hinges. I . . . .' Painted with intumescent-type paint. . . . . Labeled: FLAMMABLE - KEEP FIRE AWAY. - red letters on contrasting background. 1 1994 Codes: UFC 7902.5.9 . . . .., S . '• E. Transport of Hazardous Materials in Buildings: . I . . , • Materials Having a Hazard Ranking of 1 or 2: Liquids in containers >5 gallons and solids, in containers >50 pounds transported in/through an exit corridor or exit enclosure to be transported on a cart or truck. . . . Materials Having a Hazard Ranking of 3 or 4: Containers. transported in/through an exit corridor or exit enclosure to be transported on a cart or truck. . Exceptions: 2 liquid containers, hand carried in safety carriers. .I. •• , . Single drums, </=55 gallons transported by-drum truck. Compressed gases transported by hand trucks. Compressed gases <25 pounds. . . . 1.. . Solids <1=100 pounds transported by hand, truck. Solids <1=50 pounds . Carts & Trucks: • . . , . . . . . .. . Stable base. . . . , . . ... I ' • . . . Means of restraining containers to prevent accidental dislodgment. Stops or speed-reduction devices. . .. , Construction compatible with materials transported. . I .• Capable of containing spill from largest container transported. . Cannot obstruct required exit Width of corridor or exit enclosure. . Cannot be left unattended within any part of an exit. • '1994 Codes: '8001.10.2 '. . I . Section A - Findings & Requirements - Eriksen-Rattan Associates Inc. . . 1/16/95-Page 40 of 48 5 ' SCHUMACHER ENGINEERING: 1969 Palomar Oaks Way - Carlsbad, CA 92009 I •• HAZARDOUS MATERIALS & OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION ANALYSIS I F. Separation, for Incompatible Materials in Storage: I . .. Separate storage rooms or cabinets: Flammable/combustible liquids and materials reactive with water or other liquids cannot be stored in same room if materials can produce a hazard when in contact with flammable/combustible liquids or water. [NOTE: I . . Not applicable to Class 1 Water Reactives.] . Noncombustible partition extending not less than 18" above and to the sides.[front and. rear] of stored material, storage in approved storage cabinets, or physical distance I : separation of 20': Acids from bases, flammables, oxidizers, water-reactives, pyrophorics. Bases from acids, flammables, oxidizers, water-reactives, pyrophorics. Flammables from acids, bases, oxidizers, pyrophorics, water-reactives.. I . Oxidizers from acids, bases, flammables, water-reactives; pyrophorics. Water-reactives from acids, bases, combustible liquids, flammable liquids, oxidizers, pyrophorics. Materials are considered to be incompatible when in contact with each other they have .. I the potential to react in a manner that'generates heat, fumes, gases or byproducts which: are hazardous to life or property. . 1 ., 1994 Codes: UFC 7902.1.6, 7902.5.4, 8001.9.8, 8003.1.9, 8004.1.2 G. Materials Reactive with Water or Other Liquids: . Stored in water-tight, water-resistant containers. I . Cannot be stored in same room with flammable or combustible liquids if materials ./ present a hazardous condition when mixed with water or flammable/combustible liquids.- See Item E. Above -- not applicable to Class I Water Reactives. 1 1994 Codes: UFC 7902.1.6, 7902.5.4 Filling and Dispensing Openings: Filling and dispensing openings in containers/tanks are .required to be capped/plugged when filling/dispensing are not in progress. 1994 Codes: UFC 7902.1.12.1 S I: •Mixing/Blending'Vessels - Class I Flammable & Class II & Ill-A Combustible Liquids: I . . Self-closing, tight-fitting, noncombustible lids. Electrically connected by bond wires, piping or similar means to prevent accumulation of static electricity during dispensing operations. I . 1994 Codes: UFC 7903.1 J. Liquid Transfer - Class .1 Flammable & Class II & Ill-A Combustible Liquids: . Pumps: .I Positive displacement pumps provided with pressure relief discharging back to tank, pump suction or other suitable location. . Interlocks to prevent overpressure. - I .. Transfer by one [1] of the following methods if containers >5.3 gallons: • Safety cans. • Approved closed piping system. Containers or tanks by pump taking suction through opening in top of contàiner/tank I S. Gravity through an approved self- or automatic-closing valve when container/tank and transfer operations are provided with spill control and secondary containment. [NOTE: Not allowed for Class I-A Flammable Liquids.] Engineered liquid transfer system approved by Fire Department. 1994 Codes: . UFC 7903.1 I Section A - Findings & Requirements- Eriksen-Rattan Associates inc. 1/16/95-Page 41 of 48 SCHUMACHER ENGINEERING 1969 Palomar Oaks Way - Carlsbad, CA 92009 I ' HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ,& OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION' ANALYSIS. 0 I K. Containers & Portable Tanks - Flammable & Combustible Liquids: "I , • Class ['Flammable and Class II Liquids are not allowed to be stored in plastic containers unless such storage is within a Group H, Division 3 Oácupancy storage room without '0 . •' other storage - regardless of the amount of Class I or II Liquids stored. 0' I . Maximum size of containers and pditabie tanks: 0 Container/Tank I-A I-B I-C II Ill ' 0 Glass 1 pt ., I qt I gin , I gIn 5 gins Metal 1.glns ' 5 gins 5 gins 5 gins 5giné 0 Approved Plastic 0 0 '. 0 .0 5glns Safety 'Cans . 2 gins 5 gins 5.glns •. 5 gins .5 gins Metal Drum 60 gins 60 gins 60 gins 60 gins 60'glns Appvd Port Tank 660 gins- 0 660'glns 660 gins 0 , 660 gins 660 gins. 0 0 Polyethylene/Listed 0 , 0 0 0' " 0 ' 60 gins 0.60 gins, 0 1994 Codes: ' 'UFC 7902.1.8.1.3, Table 7902.1-A , I L. Laboratory Fume Hoods and Exhausted Enclosures: Exhaust ventilation velocity of O 0 0 laboratory fume hoods and exhausted enclosures should not be less than the following: 'I' . ' •, General Use:. ., . . . 0 • 'Average ventilation velocity at. face/access window: ' ' 100 fpm 0 0 • Minimum velocity at any point of,facè/access window: ' 0 70 fpm 0 ' • Carcinogens: . I .. Average ventilation velocity at.face/access window:. 150 fpm 0 , . Minimum velocity at any point of face/access window: 125 fpm Required Based on Materials or Increase in Exempt Amounts: 0 , , '. • Average ventilation velocity at face/access window: 200 fpm - O 0 0 • Minimum velocity at any point of face/access window: 150 fpm ' - ,NOTE: Toxic or Highly Toxic gases in use inside buildings required to be located in fume I .hoods, exhausted enclosures or gas cabinets. ,. O 1994 Codes: . UBC Table 3-D, Table 3-E; UFC 206, 8001.13-A, Table 8001.13-B , ' M. 'Gas Cabinets: Gas cabinets used for, hazardous gases, are required to meet the following 'I . requirements: 0 . >=12 gage steel. Self-closing limited access ports or noncombustible windows providing access to equipment controls. 0 0 0 Self-closing doors. 0 , • Negative pressure in relation to surrounding area. ' I0 ' - 0 • 'Average velocity at face/access ports/windows: 200 fpm' Minimum ventilation velocity at any point of access port/window: 150 fpm.. . Direct exhaust ventilation to an 'exhaust system. Toxic or Highly Toxic Gases: Exhaust system connected to a treatment system if concentration at point of discharge to the atmosphere exceeds 1/2 IDLH. 0 '0 1 1994 Codes: UFC 8003.3.1.3 0 , O I . Section A - Findings & Requirements - Eriksen-Rattan Associates Inc. 1/16/95 - Page 42 of 48 '.• ,, . 0 " '' SCHUMACHER ENGINEERING 1969 Palomar Oaks Way - Carlsbad, CA 92009 I , HAZARDOUS. MATERIAL'S & OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION ANALYSIS : N... Exhausted Enclosures: Exhausted .enclosures either required or used to increase Exempt I .Amounts are required to meet the following requirements: ' Noncombustible o Negative pressure in relation to surrounding area. . . .' Average velocity at face/access ports/windows:. . 200 fpm. •. : Minimum ventilation velocity at any point of access portlwindow 150 fpm Direct exhaust ventilation to an exhaust system. I . Toxic or. Highly Toxic Gases: Exhaust system connected to a treatment system if ' concentration at point of discharge to the atmosphere exceeds 1/2 IDLH. . ' .. NOTE: Automatic fire sprinkler system protection within enclosures may be considered to'be an acceptable alternative to. noncombustible construction when such system is not otherwise' I required 1994 Codes:' ' . UFC 206, 8003.3J.3 ..• . 5 . . . . . , I . . Gas Rooms: Gas rooms either required or used to increase Exempt Amounts are required to :meet the following requirements:. >/=1-hour fire-resistive occupancy separation. I ,, . • Negative pressure in relation to surrounding area. ' .. •.. . Direct exhaust ventilation to an exhaust system.' Toxic or Highly Toxic Gases Exhaust system connected to 'a treatment system if concentration at point of discharge to the atmosphere exceeds 1/2 IDLH 1994 Codes: UFC 208, 8003.3.1.3 .4 P. Treatment Systems: When 'required,Systems are to be designed-to: : Dilute, adsorb, absorb, contain, neutralize, burn or otherwise process contents oflargest .tanklcylinderof highest hazard material.' Size to process entire contents largest vessel. I. .' . ,' •. Handle accidental relèasè from largest vessel: I ' ' Process exhaust ventilation from cabinets, enclosures, rooms. Reduce discharge concentration to <1=112 IDLH at point of discharge to atmosphere: 1994 Codes: UFC 8003.1.3, 8004.2.3.7. I. •' .. .,' . .,. "5•' .5 . '.• . S ,, .": 0 H. .0 I 1 H5, ,'', . . .5' I S , ,, 0 , • . • , :. . S I . Section A Findings & Requirements - Eriksen-Rattan Associates Inc. ' S • S 0 1/16/95-Page43,0f48 S S • • ' SCHUMACHER ENGINEERING: 1969 Palomar-Oaks Way- Carlsbad, CA 92009 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS & OCCUPANCYCLASSIFICATION ANALYSIS I, ,Q. Compressed Gases:: General requirements for compressed gases, regardless of hazard I . . classification: ' S •' ' DOT approved cylinders. Cylinders and piping systems marked to identify contents. Cylinders secured to prevent falling or accidental dislodgment. ',• Cylinders/systems protected from physical damage.' , Cylinders protected from falling objects. ' Piping.systems marked with directional flow arrbwsat:' I . . ' • Each valve. H. Each wall, floor, ceiling penetration. Each change in direction. ' Every 20 or fraction thereof throughout piping run. 'Cylinder valve caps, plugs, collars; other protective devices in place except when cylinders are in use or being filled. I .' ' • ' Cylinders/systems located so that cannot become 'part of an electrical circuit' or used for grounding purposes. Bottom of cylinders protected from direct contact with soil or unimproved surfaces., • I ' '' . • Cylinders stored in valve end up" .upright position' except for containers having a water volume of <5 liters. Outdoor surface areas where cylinders located.graded/sloped to prevent accumulation of I water. R. Open System Use/Dispensing - Flammable & Combustible Liquids: , The dispensing or use of Class I Flammable Liquids in open systems may require Class I, Division 1 or 2 electrical wiring, equipment and devices, and local exhaust ventilation if flammable vapors are >10% of the lower flammable limit [LPL]. . ' The dispensing' or, use of Class I Flammable Liquids, or Class Ii or Ill-A Combustible Liquids in open systems may require either area exhaust, ventilation sufficient to prOduct six [6] air changes per hour'or local exhaust ventilation if the concentration of. vapors/fumes in air can create a fire or,explosion hazard [i.e.:' vapors >10% of lower flammable/explosive limit (LPL/LEL)]. 1994 Codes: UBC 1202.2 i.: i ' ' •.' ' . ' .., • I I Section A - Findings & Requirements - Eriksen-Rattan Associates Inc. , 1/16/95-Page44of48 ' ' 0 SCHUMACHER ENGINEERING: 1969 Palomar Oaks Way-Carlsbad, CA 92009 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS '& OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION ANALYSIS .. I S. Flammable Vapors/Fumes in Product Conveying Ducts: Concentration:of flammable v200rs/fumes in non-sorinklered product crrnvpvin, thirts cannot exceed 10°!,. riffhir Irur I .fiammab/explosive limit [LPLJLELJ Examples of concentrations for commonly used Flammable Liquids are as follows: Flammable Liquid LPL/LEL (%) . 10% LPL/LEL I Acetone 2:6 0.26 Acetonitrile 4.4 '. 0.44 I . Benzené 1.4 . 9.14 2-Butanone[MEK] 1.8 0.18 Butyl Chloride .. 1.9 . 0.19 Butyl Ether 1.5 0.15 I : Carbon Disulfide 1.3 0.13 Cyclohexane . , 1.3 ' 0.13 Ethanol 3.3 . 0.33 EthylAcetate ' 2.2 0.22 1 . Hexane . 1.2 0.12 Heptane . 1.05 0.105 . I . Isopropano! . .2.5 0.25 Methanol •' 6 0.6 Methylacrylate 2.8 , 0.28 Propyl Alcohol 2.1 0.21 I .Tetrahydrofuran '1.8 0.18 Toluene 1.27 ' 0.127 Trimethylpentane 1. 0.11 Ducts conveying flammable concentrations greaterthan indicated above are required to be provided with automatic fire sprinkler system protection. 1994 Codes: UMC 502, 505 . I ' ' T. Storage Plan: A storage plan showing materials stored, storage arrangements, storage height, aisles, etc. may be required by the Fire Department. 1994 Codes: UFC 8001.3, 8003.1.6 I . Security: Areas in which hazardous materials are stored and/or used are required to be secured against unauthorized entry. ' I.1994 Codes: ' ' UFC 8001.92 . . 'No smoking" Signage: •. '. . I . Signs prohibiting smoking tote provided in storage and use areas, at entrances to such areas and within 50' of outdoor storage/use areas. Signs are generally required to measure 15-inches on each, side, have white reflective letters/numbers on blue or red backgrounds and black reflective letters/numbers on -yellow. or white background. S 5 1994 Codes: UFC 8003.1.2, 8003.1.3, 8004.1.5, 8004.1.9 I 1. ' ' S • 5, ' : . • Section A - Findings &'Requirements - Eriksen-Rattan Associates Inc. ' • 1/16/95 - Page 45 of 48 SCHUMACHER ENGINEERING: 1969 Palomar Oaks Way- Carlsbad, CA 92009 I HAZARDOUS MATERIALS & OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION ANALYSIS 1 W. Ignition Sources: I : • Smoking prohibited in rooms/areas where hazardous materials are used/stored and within: 25' of outdoor storage areas. S - s Open flames and high-temperature devices'prohibited in areas containing combustibles, I : explosives, flammables, oxidizers and unstable reactives unless such equipment is approved/listed for such use and locations. 1994 Codes: UFC 8003.1.2, 8003.1.3,8004'1.5, 8004 :19 I X. Fire Department Access Roadways: Fire department apparatus access roads required to be provided within 150' of all portions of exterior walls of 1st story of buildings and exterior : storage/use areas: I .• >1=20' unobstructed Adth. >1=13.5' unobstructed vertical clearance. S : . All weather driving surface -- capable of support loads imposed by fire department I .apparatus. Turning radius as required by Fire Department. . Dead-ends </=150' in length. I . . Maximum grade/slope as required by Fire Department. . Signs/other approved notices to identify roads and prohibit obstruction thereof. s Contact Fire Department for specific requirements. .1994 Codes: 902.2 Y. Water Supply: . S Approved water supply capable of supply required flow for fire protection required to bed. I S provided for büildingsand exterior.storage/use areas. . On-site fire hydrants and water mains capable of supplying required flow may be required by Fire Department. I : 1994 Codes: . UFC 903 . Z. Knox Box & Knox Vault: The Fire Department-may I require that keys for building access and access to all . . rooms/areas within the building be contained in a "Knox Box" located on an exterior wall in a location approved by the Fire Department.. The Fire Department may require that building floor plans, site plans and hazardous I :materials information be provided in a "Knox. Vault" located on an exterior wall in a location approved by the Fire Department. . S 1994 Codes: UFC 902.4, 902.3, 8001.3 . S I . AA. Training and Procedures: . Employees are required to be experienced; trained and knowledgeable in the processes, I . policies, practices and procedures associated with use, handling and storage of S S hazardous materials associated with Schumacher Engineering's operations. The training, experience and knowledge is to include written procedures, provisions for cleanup of spills and leaks, and persons designated and trained to be liaison personnel I : for the Fire Department. . . Schumacher Engineering's emergency plan and procedures should be discussed and coordinated with the Fire Department. S - 1,994 Codes: . UFC 8001.9 : Section A - Findings & Requirements -. Eriksen-Rattan Associates Inc. 1/16/95 - Page 46 of 48 5 SCHUMACHER ENGINEERING: 1969 Palomar Oaks Way - Carlsbad, CA 92009 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS & OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION. ANALYSIS- Hazard Identification Placarding: ., . I . . . Hazard identification placard ing Health", "Flammability" and "Reactivity" of hazardous materials stored and used required for buildings and rooms/areas in buildings where - hazardous materials are located and for tanks. . . I . The Fire Department may require such placarding to be located on the building exterior adjacent to each entrance into the building at entrances to storage/use areas within storage/use areas and on tanks. The exact location of each sign should be approved by the Fire. Department. I . Signs are generally, required to measure 15-inches on each side, have white reflective letters/numbers on blue or red backgrounds' and black reflective letters/numbers on yellow or white background. . . .. I . . • See .UFC Standard 79-3 [NFPA 704] for placarding requirements and standards. Flacarding recommendations based on Section B - Hazardous Materials Analysis .....................inentory information: . S. I . . . . Buildings' I and 2: Health' 4 . . . Flammability ' 4 . .. '. . . Reactivity .' 3 I .. . . Special ' CR, OX, WR A. ES-1/Flammable Gas Bunker S ' Health • 1• . I . . . ., Flammability 4 '. Reactivity . 1. ... Special • COMPRESSED GAS I ,S • ES-2/Hydrogen Gas Bunker . . Health. Flammability' 5 4.. Reactivity I . .. . Special •. COMPRESSEDGAS ES-3/lnert Gas Bunker Health I. . .Flammability .. 0 , Reactivity Special COMPRESSED GAS . S I . E&4/oxygen Cryogenics Bunker, ..S Health Flammability'. 0' . . Reactivity . . 1' I . .. S. Special' OX - CRYO 'S S . ES-5/Outdoor Pad StOrage S 'Health-,- 3 . . . . Flammability .. . S Reactivity Special . OX COR - 1994 Codes: UFC 7401, 8001.7, 8003.12, 8004.19, UFC Std 79-3 1 Section A - Findings & Requirements - Eriksen-Rattan Associates inc. S S ' 1/16/95 - Page 47 of 48 S . S - HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ABBREVIATIONS A = Aerosol "• .. HR = Hazard Ranking/UF. 79-3 UNITS = Quantity Measurements, ALl = Aerosol Level 1' H = Health Cu = Curies AL2= Aerosol Level 2 . F = Flammability Cf Cubiô Feet AL3 = Aerosol Leel3 R = Reactivity •' Gins = Gallons . Lbs = Pounds . C = Cryogenics., HI =. Highly Toxic mCc = Microcuries " mCi = Millicuries I , CA = Carcinogen . . ' •. IR = Irritant . UR = Unstable Reactive CABS = Approved Stge Cabs L = Liquid . , UR = Unstable React I I -: UR2= Unstable Rèact2 CAS# = LG = Liquefied Gas . UR3 = Unstable React 3 I . Chemical Abstract Service # Merck # . . ' LOC= Location/Control Area UR3D=Unstable React 3-Det ' UR3N=Unstable React 3-Nondet Aldrich # •. . UR4 = Unstable React 4 Sigma # . ' NAME = Chemical/Product Name 'I RTECS # . ' WR = Water Reactive Other# . NHL = Non-Hazardous . WR1 = Water React 1 Mix Mixture ' WR2 = Water React 2 N = None/Not Applicable OHH = Other Health Hazard ' ' WR3 = Water React 3 CD .= Combustible Dust ' . OP = Organic Peroxide , .>15PSl = Flammable LiqUids ' OPI = Org Peróx I ' ' Pressureized >15 psi I CF = Combustible Fiber 0P2 = Org Perox II OP3 = Org Perox Ill CG = Compressed Gas' , . 0P4 = Org Perox IV. . I OPUD = Org Perox Unclass Det . .. . . CL Combustible Liquid . • • . • . - . CL2 = Combust Liq II ' 'OX = Oxidizer • ,. . • CL3A = Combust Liq Ill-A'.". OX1 = Oxidizer. 1 • . • . .. '. '. CL3B = Combust Liq ),II-B, OX2 ='Oxidizer2 • . ', . • . OX3' = Oxidizer 3 . . . . •. I . CONC% = Concentration • •OX4 = Oxidizer'4 • ,.. . • •• . . . . CR or. COR = Corrosive PY = Pyrophoric • . • I CRY = Cryogenic • • R = Radioactive • CRYF = Cryogenic Flammable RAD = Radioactive • ,• • ' • CRYO = Cryogenic Oxidizing . . . SSolid • 'EX = Explosive ••' .• • . ''• . • • SN = Sensitizer . • - .FG = Flammable Gas . • -. FGL = Flammable Gas Liquefied STATE = Physical Material State. . . I ' • FL = Flammable Liquid FLIA = Flam Liq I-A • , STGE = Storage. . . . . •. .' . • . •. . . • FL1B = Ham Liq I-B . •' ST3= Sara Title Ill EHS . FL1C = Flam Liq I-C :' RQ = Reportable Qty I . - . '• • TPQ ='Threshold Planning Qty . . . . FS' Flammable Solid . • : '.' - ' . - • - . • , • TX Toxic ,.• • • I . G=Gas • •• • .., .• ' UC = Closed System Use- •, HAZ CLASS =Classification • .• , . • • . • UO = Open System' Use . , • • - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 11 ow. Iff 750 A 09C -k- - Wo SECOND FLOOR PLAN Fift3T Fl 009 PLAN PROPOSED OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATiONs - U — &d __ -. P.O. BOX 308 10868 DRURYNE LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA 90262 (310) 639-4367 . (714) 994-1712 • FAX'(310) 639-4106 I 10-2-95 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN, WE ARE A NATIONAL SPRAY BOOTH MANUFACTURER AND HAVE BUILT PAINT -SPRAY BOOTH- FOR MANY YEARS FOR NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL. CUSTOMERS ND HAVE RECEIVED APPROVALS FROM ALL AUTHORITIES HAVING JtJRI SDI CTIONO3JER PAINT SPRAY BOOTHS. 1 - OUR SPRAY BOOTHS MEET ALL .NATIONAL AND LOCAL CODES ' SUCH AS:. NATIONAL FIRE CODE, NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE, NATIONAL MECHANICAL. CODE AND ARE ACCEPTED BY ALL AUTHORITIES SUCH AS: FIRE ,DEPARTMZNTS, BUILDING ' DEPARTMENTS AS WELL AS OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY (OSHA), FACTORY MUTUAL- AND OTHER INSURANCE CPMPANIES. FOR THE PAINT SPRAY BOOTH CONSTRUCTION1 WE ADHERE' TO THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE, 1991 EDITION AND NFPA-33 AND ALL -AIR POLLUTION CO I DES.. ,• - ; -. HOWEVER, IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE INSTALLER TO OBTAIN PERMITS AND APPROVALS FOR THE INSTALLATION FROM LOCAL AUTHORITIES AND PROVIDE, THE NECESSARY ELECTRICAL' CONTROLS TO MEET THE ABOVE MENTIONED CODES. YYYOS, B;L K, E~R OS. S H S. , 5.. 05 .5 - .5;. - NOTES ..-.;n . RefertoAicle14 Section i4.2O6Of the Uniform Fire Code. ________ All electrical and plumbing to conform to local codes. Insulated duct must run. 18" above and below any combustible material 4 Attach duct work together with sell-tapping screw. . • Use iO x ~' long sheet metal screw. Space screws approximately t 2' around the circumference of the stack. t•• ,' -- — I'd Od 10 — G • I - --- . 1• -• an - --------i______ F * . — •.•— •-- ------ih----- - tCt Ia I —t - Stack Gauge of Diameter Steei Opening Root (Minimuml 12' 22 18 - 18' — 22 24 20 30 30" 20 36" 34" 18 . 40' 42" 16 48" 48' 18 .54" AUST STACKFOR PAINT SPRAY BOOTHS . 2 3 5 6 4 ELECTRICAL CODES NOTES 1 Cross section of open type fluorescent light with 16 x 54" ¼" obscure wire glass. Light is always on the outside of booth. Portable Lamp may not be used. 2 Cross-section of vapor tight incandescent light with 24' x 24" x 'A" obscure wire glass. Light is always on the outside of booth. Portable lamps may not be used. 3 Electrical fixtures (switches, electrical boxes, etc.) within 5'-O" area from front of booth must comply with the National Electric Code for Class I Division.2 locations. Drawing shows two different options in lighting arrangements. NOTE The vapor tight lights may be placed anywhere behind 1/4w obscure wire glass. 4 When booth has front doors with a door switch (interlock), open typefluorescent lights must be a minimum of 3'-0 from the door opening. When door is open interlock is activated closing solenoid valve shutting air off to spray equip ment. Front doors must have air intake filler cells. NOTE: Interlock system prevents paint gun from being used when fan is not in operation. 5 Class I Division I& 2-Areas- Where booth does not have an air interlock system (see NOTES for item 6) B Class I Division 2 Areas- When booth has an air interlock system (see NOTES below) NOTE: Class I Division 1 Inside of booth where vapors and residues may be present in quantities sufficient to pro- duce explosive and lgnitible mixtures under normal operating conditions NOTE Class 1, Division 2 -Area outside of booth. 5 & 6 Shows paint spray booth and hazardous area around the booth. All electrical in this area shall comply with Aticie 501 of the National Electrical Code. 791 STANDARD FLOOR FILTER BOOTHS 1 - .-. Typical vaportight fluorescent lighting arrangement 4-tube. Ordered on request. Typical vaportight incandescent lighting arrangement for working depth under 1 O'-O. 300 watt GENERAL INFORMATION Booth Package includes: fan filter grids motor exhaust filters solenoid valve nuts& bolts manometer blue print light fixtures assembly instructions Not included: duct package tubes or bulbs air lines sprinkler systems motor starter electrical switches electrical hook-up All industrial paint spray booths adhere to the Uniform Fire Code. (1982) and the National Electric Code (1984). Always check Ideal fire and electrical codes for special conditions that may prevail in your area. Incandescent light fixtures as listed are 300 watt vaportight, adhering to hazardous area class I division 2 from the National Electric Code. Open type fluorescent light fixtures as listed are 172 watt, 4' long, 4 tuba Vaportrght fluorescent fixtures are 172 wait, 4' long, 4 tube, adhering to hazardous area class 1 division 2 from the National Electric Code. All light fixtures are placed on the outside of Va" obscure wire glass,, gasketed and locked in place in the working depth of booth. Fan motors I H.P. and over are 3 phase. 208/230(4.60 volt, 60 Hz. under 1 H.P. are single phase, 1201240 volt, 60cy1. Light fixtures are 110 volt. Solenoid valve is single phase, voltage must be stated (110, 220, etc.). Fan outlet top is standard. Back or side outlet can be supplied but position must be requested. H.V. after model number, signifies higher face velocity for that model. All other models that have no alternate H.V. units can increase their face velocity at a minimum expense by increasing listed horsepower and pulley diameter. Panels are skidded and banded for fork lift handling. Fans, motors, filters, etc., are packaged but loose. Shipment by public carrier has special requirements contact factory or dealer. . Additional features available: ,conveyor openings special width or height requirements explosion proof motors special lighting arrangements working depth extension Contact dealer or factory for price adjustment. Booth dimensions and price are subject to change without notice. SECTION 08000 3[ DOOR SCHEDULE DOOR NO. DIMENSION DOOR _____ ASSEMBLY FIRE RATING FRAME DOOR FINISH EXTANT. REMARKS _____________ W H TYPE MATL 101A 3-0" X 7'-O" A AL - AL STORE FRONT EXISTING TO BE RELOCATED I01B 3'-O" X 8-0" C WD 20 MIN HM -- HM FRAME W/SIDE LIGHT 102 3'-O" X 7'-O" B WD -- HM -- 103 3-0" X 7'-0" B WD -- HM -- 104 3-0" X 7-0" B WD --- HM 105 3-0" X 8-0" C WD 20 MIN HM --- HM FRAME W/SIDE LIGHT 106 3'-O" X 7-0' B WD 20 MIN HM -- LOCATE IN EXIST. OPNG., SIGNAGE 14/A6.2 107 3'-O" X 7'4" B WD 20 MIN HM -- LOCATE IN EXIST.. OPNG., SIGNAGE 14/A6.2 108 3'-O" X 7'-O" 8 WD --- HM -- . 109A 3-0' .X 8'-0" C WD .20 MIN HM --- HM FRAME W/SIDE LIGHT, PANIC HARDWARE 109B 3-0" X 8'-0" A AL --- AL AL LOCATED IN EXIST. STOREFRONT HARDWARE 110 . •-• - - --- lilA 3-0". X 8'-0" C WD 20 MIN HM --- HM FRAME W/SIDE LIGHT 111B 3'-0' X'-8'-O" C WD 20 MIN HM ---.. HM FRAME W/SIDE LIGHT 112 3'-O" X 8-0". B WD 20 MIN HM REUSE EXIST. OPNG., SIGNAGE 14/A6.2 113 3-0' X 8-0" B WD 20 MIN HM 114 -- -- - --- -- ANOD EXIST. TO REMAIN, RE-KEY TO MATCH 115 PR3'-0" X 4-6" D WD -- WD PAINT 4-6" HIGH GATE IN LOW WALL 116A .3-0". X 8'-0" C WD 20 MIN HM. -- HM FRAME W/SIDE LIGHT 116B 3-0" X 8'-0" C WD 60MIN HM -- 117 3-0" X 7-0" B WD --- HM -- PAIR V-6". X 7'-O" B WD --- 118A 3'-0" X 7-0" G MET 60 MIN HM --- STC 45 118B 3'-O" X 7-0" B WD --- HM 119 --- -- -- --- - -- 120 3-0" X 8'-0" G MET 60 MIN HM --- STC 45 121 3'-O" X 8'-0" C WD --- HM 122 3'-O" X 7-0" B WD 60 MIN HM 123 3-0" X 8-0' G MET HM --- 124 -- -- - .125 --. -- 126A 3'-O" X 8-0" C WO 20 MIN HM -- HM FRAME W/SIDE LIGHT 1268 PR3'-0" X 8'-0" C WD 20 MIN HM -- 127 - -- - --- - - --- EXISTING TO REMAIN STING TO REMAIN DECEMBER 1995 95001 SCHUMACHER - 1979 BLDG. DOOR SCHEDULE 08000 -1 SECTION 08000 DOOR SCHEDULE DOOR NO. DIMENSION DOOR ASSEMBLY FIRE - RATING FRAME DOOR FINISH E. REMARKS w H TYPE MAL 130 3'-0" X T-O" B WD 20 MIN HM - 131 3'-O" X 7'-0" B WD 20 MIN HM - 132A 6-0" X 12'-0" H MET 60 MIN MFR. MFR- ROLLuP;INSULATED FLAT SLAT, FIELD PAINT 132B 3'-0" X 7'-0" G HM --- HM PAINT REUSE EXISTING OPENING 133A 8'-O' X 12-0' F MET -- MFR MFR ROLL-UP W/MAN DOOR - EXIT DOOR ONLY 133B 8'4" X 12-0" F MET --- MFR MFR ROLL-UP W/MAN DOOR'- EXIT DOOR ONLY k $ (o.xfzcyz. 1?tQP'V1W DECEMBER 1995 95001 SCHUMACHER - 1979 BLDG. -: ¼ coo. . ... . . . cn Cl) -, -v ..*.• ... .., - - rn TYPE iTYPEC, .-.TYFEb •*** -..* PAINT GRADE SOLID CORE PAINT GRADE SOLID HOLLOW METAL SOLID CORE WOOD WIll-I LITE CORE * WOOD; - FRAME Wi. SIDE.-LITE, * en WOOD * SECTION 08010 WINDOWSCHEDULE WINDOW NO. WINDOW SIZE FRAME _________________ GLAZING ASSEMBLY FIRE RATING. SILL HI A.F.F. REMARKS W H MATERIAL TYPE .1 l'-8" X 8'-0" AL -- AT FLR. TEMPERED RELOCATED GLAZING 2 5'-9 1/2" X 9'-9" - --- AT FLR. TEMPERED RELOCATED GLAZING 3 5'-g 1/2" X 9-9" - - AT FLR. TEMPERED RELOCATED GLZAING 4 8'-0" X 4'0" . -.- . -- 5'..9" TEMPERED 5 1-0" X 7'-O" HM 45 MIN AT FLR. SEE DOOR LEGEND, TEMPERED 6 1-0" X 8-0' HM' , 45 MIN AT FLR. SEE DOOR LEGEND, TEMPERED 7 1'-O" .X 8'-O" HM 45 MIN AT FLR. SEE DOOR LEGEND, TEMPERED 8 (2) 2'-0' X 8'-0" HM 45 MIN . AT FLR. . SEE DOOR LEGEND, TEMPERED 9 1'-O" X 8-0" . HM ' 45 MIN AT F.LR: SEE DOOR LEGEND, TEMPERED 10 5'-0' X 4'-0" HM . 45 MIN 3'-0" 11 '1'0 X 8-0' . HM' 45 MIN AT FLR. SEE DOOR LEGEND, TEMPERED .12 1-0" X 8-0" HM 45 MIN AT FLR. SEE DOOR LEGEND, TEMPERED 13 6-0" X 4-0" AL -- * 31 0 SAWCUT OPENING 14 6-0' X 4'-0" AL , --- 3'-O" SAWCUT OPENING * ,. . 01/16/96 Page 1 -. SCHUMACHER ENGINEERING -BUILDING 1919 PROPOSED INVENTORY Item CAS# Conc% State Material Name Hazard Class Storage JUnitsjJ Use-Closed lj Units Use-Open Units l Cabs il >15Psl 1 Mx-44O 100 I. Adheaivelcemenl/SealanhI35-40%AcetocieI67-64-1 15-20% 110-54.3.3S-4d%Resins, 10-15%Dutadiene CA FL1B, IR, OHH, 0.0000 Gins 0.0000 Gins .1000 Gins N N *i-e& su Acrylonitrile Capolymerllo7-13-1, '1% Oyel (FIFIL H3 F31 2 00-01-163 100 L Chlorinated Solvents [Weld-On Solvent] (HR:H3F2) CU,IR, Oft TX 0.0000 Gins 0.0000 Gins .1000 Gins N N 10l Lir 3 00-01-160 100 A Circuit Cooler (Doradfkaoramethane#S-71-8, All, IR, OHH. SN 0.0000 Lbs 0.0000 Lbs .0250 Lbs N N fe!!193 TrIthlorofkoromethane(15-69-4J (KR: 143 Fl) 11.2 4 00.01-162 100 A I Connector Plus 111 1.Trid'iloroelhan., Poiyphenyl Ether, ALl, IR, OHH 0.0000 Lbs 0.0000 Lbs 1.0000 Lbs N I N 1+4Q. Carbon Dioxide) (HR H3 Fl) 17q S 00-01-167 100 A EMI-RFI Shield (HR H3 F31 AL3, IR, OHH 0.0000 Lbs 0.0000 Lbs 4.0000 Lbs N N 6 00.01.53 60 1 Frost Guard 1142 Fl) CL38, IR 0.0000 Gins 0.0000 Gins .1000 Gins N N 1317-33-5 100 S Molybdenum(IV) Sulfide (Molybdenum Disulfide) (KR: 1,121 IR 0.0000 Lbs H 0.0000 Lbs .0500 Lbs N N 8 M.525 100 A Paint. Spray (Touch-Up) (KR: 143 F31 AU, IR, OlIN 0.0000 Lbs 0 0.0000 Lbs 1.5000 1 Lbs N N I M 00.01464 100 T Plastic Dip I11 ,,l-ThdIoroethane, Methylene Chloride. Toluene) All, CA, 111, OHH, 0.0000 0.0000 Lbs 1.5000 Lbs N N 4€4 O3 (KR:1431 SN 17.5 10 Mix-449 100 •• RTV Adhesive Sealant 160.85% Poly(Dunethylsitoxane) '5% CL3B, IR 0.0000 Gins 0.0000 Gins .0100 Gins N N 4e-48e Potyacatoxysilane, 10-15% Silicon Dioxidal163l-86-9) (KR: 142 Fil 11 00.01-166 100 -1- Snoop (Surfactant) (KR: 1421 IR 0.0000 Gins 0.0000 Gins .5000 Gins N N 11 12 00.01-168 100 A Touch and Foam 109herry1metharia DiisocyanateI26477-40-5, AL3, IR,OHH 0.0000 Lbs 0.0000 Lbs .7500 Lbs N N *94.485 CNor*inaied Phosphat&13674-84-5 Dsiethyl Etherlll5-10.6, '23 Prcpana4-98-6, lsobutane(12-28-51 [MR: 143 F31 13 N-43 100 1 Vacuum Pump Oil (KR: 143 F21 CL3A, IR, OHH 0.0000 Gins 0.0000 Gins .0100 Gins N N 14 N-43 100 I. Vacuum Pump Oil tHR:H3F2) CL3A, IR, OHM 0.0000 Gins 0.0000 Gins 1 .1000 Gins N N 164 44P . IS Mix-372 100 A A-70 AU, IR 0.0000 Lbs 0.0000 Lbs 2.0000 Lbs N N 404103- Hydrocarbon PropeUanU68476415-7, 15% Petroleum 0i1164742- I WO-40150%AW*tcPstro*m oastillato=5241-3,25%- orrosion lnflitorMlettIng AgenUFraanca) (HR: 142 F21 16 7440-37-I C 100 C Arson law. 39.941 [KR: 01 NH 0.0000 Gins 0.0000 Gins 1.0000 GIns N N 17 N-31 100 -i' Epoxy Adhesive (KR: 143 FII CL3B, 1X 0.0000 Gins 0.0000 Gins .1000 Gins N N 104-CL 18 002975.00-0 100 I. Genesotv 2004196% Dith1orofluoroethanel17l7-00-6, 3.9% IR, OHH 25.0000 Gins 0.0000 Gins 9.0000 Gins N N 01 10P MethanoU67-56-1, 0.1% NitromethaneI75-52-5) (KR: 143) OHH- -0OOCGlAs -500c :; z ==101 ql* 20 00-01426 100 L NuttdluorAPF-100, APF-140, APF-175, APF-200, APF-215, IR - 0.0000 Gins 0.0000 Gins .2500 Gins N N 164-1.06 APF-240, APF-EXP (KR: K21 I its 21 00.01-153 100 T Poilycon 1304 (Polymeric Isocyanate) (HR: H2 El RI WRI) CL3B, IR, SN, LIR1, 0.0000 Gins 0.0000 Gins 6.0000 Gins N N *64.486 I WRI 22 00.01-154 100 L Polyden7700(HR:142F3) - FL1BIR 0.0000 Gins 11 0.0000 Gins 11 1.0000 Gins -N N seitlej 1 i Mix-449 100 jL I R1V Mhesrve Sealant (60-85% Polv(thmethvlsiloxane). '5% CUB, IR 0.0000 i 0.0000 1.0000 Polyacetoxysilw,e, 10.15% Silicon OioxideI73l-86-9j (KR: 142 Fil Mq /16/96 Page HUMACHER ENGINEERING - BUILDING I 119 -PROPOSED INVENTORY S S . . Item CAS# Conc% State Material Name Hazard Class Storage Units En 1H Use-Closed UiI1 Use.OpeJj Units 24 63148-62-9 100 L SdsneI lAmersd 1-4511001 (Polydwnethytsdoxanel t0a UCL38 j Corning 200 0.0000 . Gins 0.0000 Gins .2500 Gs N . N . Z-' 25 00.01-159 100 T The(malcotelx3o% Zinc Oxidell3l4-13-2.'SO%Slicone Fluid, 5% Fijn.d SUics) (Hft P131 ffIR. OHH . 0.0000 Gins 0.0000 . Gins .1000 Gins - N N leirlee. 7. £1 26 Mix-441 .. 100 L 10-15% Vinyl Torpolymer/63148-65-2,25-V% TairJI4807-96-6. '5% Titanium DoxideIl3463-67-7,x5% . . PoIy(Tetrs!hioroethyiene)Teflon9002-844. 20.25% Vegetable Ii 0918001 -79-4J IHR: P13 F'31 IR. OHH fi 0.0000 . . Gina Gins . .1000 Gins N N 404'to& 1(.D 27 7440-31-5 100 $ Tin (Powder)(Bws)IMoss.yl(HR:01 ..NH 0.0000 Lbs . 0.0000 Lbs 25,0000 Lbs N P1 127 I01' 28 71-554 100 L OHM 0.0000 Gins 0.0000 Gins 1.0000 GIns N N 1616. 29 P1-43 100 1 Vssan Pump 08 (HR P13 F21 CUA,iOHH 0.0000 Gins 0.0000 Gins 1.0000 Gins N i 30 00.01.141 100 1 Varnish 152% Xylen&I330.20.7, 36% iron 0x14s1801 1-97.0,2% Alkyd ReUV68459-31.4J(HR: 83 F3) FL1C, IR, OHM 0.0000 Gins . 0.0000 . Gins. .1000 Gins - N - N . 1C1'108 izo 31 00.00.98 100 ________ $ Epoxy Resin (70% Epoxy PoIynwl84778-06.3; 30% Ammo Polymer194338.O7.9) (HR: 1431 ' IR. OHM . . 0.0000 . Lbs 0.0000 Lbs .0119 Lbs N .11-5 N *01 1*4- 32 0001-161 100 __________ A NitromethaneI75-52-, '1% IscpropoV6743-0) (Hft 83 FII ALl, IR, 01*4 0.0000 Lbs 0.0000 . Lbs 1 .0238 Lbs N . - N *01-1-14- 175 33 Mix-462 100 1 Grqft&778242.5,20-25% Copper/7440.5", -5% Silicon 0iox7631-9,10.15% Aluminum Postal (HR:H2F1I C1.38. IR 0.0000 Gins .5000 Gins . 0.0000 Gins N N . 1611114- iZ'I 34 00.01-126 100 __________ 1 MOM" APF-100, APF.140. APF-175. APF-200. APF-215. APF-240, APF-EXP (8R P121 IR 0.0000 Gins . 0.0000 Gins 1 1.0000 Gins N N 361-144- , 35 8002-05-9 100 1 08 (Petroleurn Distastes) (HR 83 Fl) CA, CL38. IR 0.0000 Gins 0.0000 Gins .0119 Gins N N 36 Mix-530 100 1 Psbd RemoverFthfller (H 83 F31 FL1B. IR. OHM 0.0000 Gins 0.0000 Gins .0119 Gins N N 37 Mx-526 100 1 PsirUdfTauGP,pose?rinerflJnderaat) [HR: 83 F2) CU. IR, OHM 0.0000 Gins . 0.0000 Gins .0119 Gins N N *04-ij4 38 Mix-525 .100 A Pai1, Spray rToum4Jp)[HRH3F3] . . AU. IR. OHH 0.0000 Lbs 0.0000 Lbs .5000 Lbs N - N 39 N-lB 100 L (HR. 83 F2) CL3A, IR. OHM 0.0000 Gins 0.0000 Gins .2642 N N 40 - Mix-449 - 100- F111 . I CL3S IR 0.0000 Gins 0.0000 Gins .1000 om N *01-411- 411 00.01.166 100, 1-tfadal)(I4R 82). IR . 0.0000 Gins 0.0000 Gins .0500 Gins N, N 104 42 78-10-4 - 100 1 rFrl lolhosilicate (Ethyl orthosihcate) (Ethyl Silicate) l S8icstej (TEOSJ(8R P13 F21 CU, IR. OHM . 0.0000 Gins 0,0000 Gins .5283 Gins N N . 104 114 j 2.5 43 00.01.147 100 2%Xy$en&1330-20-7.36%ironoxldeJ8oll-97.0,2% bl6845931-4) (HR 83 F3) - "-. - FLIC IR.OHH - 0.0000 . Gins 0.0000 Gins - .1250 GIns N N ' ICI-114 Z.O Z%T 1732.18-5 100 T ivesetIndicsIorJ(Hft0). NH -- 0.0000 0.0000 Gins 2.5000 N ICI-114 45 00.01.151 100 1 tel' Base) (HR. 82 Fl) . CL3B. IR - 249000 Gins 0.0000 Gins .1000 Gina N N 11 M 46 67-64-1 100 t" Acetone (2-Propanone) (Hft H2 F31 - FLI B.iR .5000 Gins 2.0000 Gins .5000 Gins V N 63- 100 00 Ht -Of- 311.0004 -Of- 00900 V .- 4P AI.(0 IrIetJ1In) . - - _-000C S_i S V 4 01/17/96 14:36 V619 931 1819 SCHUMACHER I1 0l V V - V . V V V V *** ACTIVITY REPORT **s TRANSMISSION OK V TX/RX NO. 0218 V * V V V V CONNECTION TEL V .. 95601576'.V V. CONNECTION ID V V START TIME V V 01/17 14:34; V V V - USAGE TIME .. 02'08 - V V V • • V PAGES . 4 V V• V RESULT . OK V V V 4 V V - 4 . V V - V V - •4 V I V V V F- V December 6, 1995 McGraw/Baldwin Architects 701 B Street, Suite 200 San Diego, CA 92101-8101 Attn. Philip Pape SCHUMACHER. McGraw/Baldwin Architects' Received - i L'L.j o O 19 9 By ProLNo. rile Route to cooies Dear Phil, Please allow this letter to serve as a response to Glen Adamek's (City Planning Department) hazardous materials questions for the 1979 Schumacher facility. In reference to Glen's questionnaire (document 95-1636 numbers 75 A, b, c, and d), I have formulated the following responses. Number 75. Schumacher does not intend to store quantities of chemicals that would trigger the County Business Plan reporting requirements. There are four areas in the 1979 facility where small amounts of chemicals will be stored and utilized. They are: the Engineering Lab (Rm. 126),Production Lab (Rim 127), Calibration Test (Rm. 130) and the Maintenance Shop (Rm. 119). The Engineering Lab, Production Lab and the Calibration Test areas are actually all designated as the Electronic Assembly area where printed circuit boards will be assembled and tested in electronic equipment designed to dispense high purity chemicals. The area Managers have generated the attached list of chemiôals (Chemical Name, Quantities, and Room Locations) to be stored in these areas. All of these materials will be' properly stored in, ventilated flame cabinets with the appropriate spill containment built into the cabinets. Each Production area is designed with local exhaust: ventilation fume hoods to accommodate the chemicals used in those areas. Spill control kits consisting of various sorbants to handle spills will be stored throughout the electronic assembly areas where a spill potential exists There will-be no floor drains installed in the electronic assembly areas which effectively reduces the potential for chemicals entering the sewer or storm water systems. - - - Number 75 a) The amounts of each type of hazardous material to be stored in the 1979 facility is listed on the attached chemical inventory sheets. There will be no volume of chemical in excess of one gallon "in use" at any one time in the facility. The electronic assembly areas are primarily dry labs which use small quantities of chemicals for electronic circuit board quality testing and maintenance purposes. When the chemicals are not in use, they will be stored in flame cabinets located in the rooms described above. - Number 75 b) The attached chemical inventory list denotes the specific location and room numbers where the chemicals will be used and. stored. The Engineering Lab will contain one flame cabinet to safely store their chemicals. There will be two additional flame cabinets located near the PC Board Cleaning area which will store all chemicals for the Production Lab and Calibration Test room. The Maintenance area will have two flame cabinets to safely store their chemicals used primarily for architectural coatings and clean-up solvents. Number 75c) - - Due to the relatively small volumes of chemicals stored in the facility, there is no potential for a chemical spill in excess of one gallon, therefore, spill containment calculations are not required. The flame cabinets are designed to contain a spill in the event a chemical container releases material inside the cabinet. A Unit of Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. 1969 Palomar Oaks Way a Carlsbad, CA 92009 (619) 931-9555 s 1-800-545-9241 California Only 1-800-545-9242 Continental U.S.A. I 6-3 I * '4 • / NAME Production Lab and Calibration Test (Electronic Assembly) DATE 11/9/95 S I 11 - 44 -S . 4 54 k S * -, -5 - 4- U' -4 5 4 4 ci - 44, S. •'••' - S -S 1,' ' . '*- - . . - I S - •', - ,-. -- .4 • S , -. 1 • — 4 4 — H\Safety'REK5 16 doc\plz ,, .. f 4: .., - - Page lvóf 4 Chemical Inventory 1979Palomar Oaks Way, . *- An ISO 4rlifl2doopoy S. f 4 _____ ' []SCHUIVIACHER - ( & - 44. - • 4 - . --4 .4. 4 4 -. - . --.4 - - . 4 4 • . . Te,. . t.. ME . .-. . •_4 . * -NA: Production Lab and Calibration st (Electronic Assembly) DATE:' 11/9/95 ' ..' - - * . - ._4 -.. .-.- - 4- - ... 4 —:-' --.-•- - .4 4 - - t-•-t • % 44 4 p3 44 4. .4 . Ti 4.4. 4 * .4 44.2 - • -4 4 44 •' Q_ I .4 4 4 p 4 , II, . • .4 - * . - .# 4 - - 4 • .. I t / *' .4 Page2of4 L. Chemical Inventory 1979 Palomar Oaks Way 44• - .4. . 4 - -4. 4-.- - . - - 4 5_ A ISO C. tlfl,d C'.'mpany • --. • - -: . ' - •. --•- - • - - . -. 1.J5CHUIVIACHER - - .,,— - . 4 - -4,-- . 4 .4 -.4 - - 4.••4'* • * 4 7, - . - . - '.•, • get 4 . -. _• . .4 4.- 4 - - '-4 4. 4.4 •, 4'. - - - ' * *•4 • - • ' n • - • - .rfr . 4-.. Ref: H:\SafetyREK516doc\pIz -. ''. -. . • .4 4 . - -. • '., '. - - ). - ., - ,3_, , % _, :-.. : t . - .4--.. 0- - - I 1-- t - t I -* - 1. 4 . :-,4 • . .. Page 3 of 4 A ' Chemical In'entory . "-• . - . . . . - 1979 Palomar Oaks Way l ' AoISOC*rtlfldCompa*y . '- - •- 4 - . . . .'- ' - - . -• - - - - .. -, ESCHUMACHER Cflt Nb,30536 -. . . - : ,- . . - * -- . 4 • - -- 4 )- I NAME: .. r MAINTENANCE/ WOOD SHOP •- -DATE: 11/15/95 -- •• .* - . . -- - - -. - .-.--. .- - -4 - • . . '• ' fl fin ... . ..., . . .4,• . 41 A ,L Page 4 of4 -.' .' .-' t n . Chemical Inventory 1979 Palomar Oaks Way 4' '4. •' •2 A - - . - •• -." .4 . An ISO C,rtlllnd Comp.n.y 4. flft'• - -. . 3.. ..cfi - 4'. -fi ., fi , iE"knv ffl4. . .. • '1 •- fifl4.4. - * * *4_ - "'• [JSCHUFAACAERfr * - Cefliflaft N mb* 30536 - * . - •fl.;_ . - - •--.- -- - — -4... .NAMIE:-EngineeringLàboratory - . ' DATE: 41/9/95: 44, ;J" 'j. es 4i 4 4.. -4.. 4. 4— -- '--'•-- 4.' .4. ... - 4.. ' 4.— - t fi , .-. . fi ... .4•_ 3 , 4., . - - . -4 —. -fi •fl 4$ . ' Ref. H \Safety\REK5i6 doc\plz - -- - - . fl.. • 4 - ..t • .. . . .1 B U I:LD I N G P E B M I T' PCR No: PCR96005 02/23/96 1 4-:35 . . Project No: A9502395 Page 1 of. 1 , . .. Development No: Job Address: 1979 PALOMAR OAKS WY. - Suite: Permit Type:' PLAN CHECK REVISION . . . . Parcel No: 213-092-21-00 ' Lot'#: Valuation: 0 • Construction Type: VN Occupancy Group: B2 .., . Reference#:. Status:'.ISSUED Decription: SEISMIC RETROFIT- SCHUMACHER . . Applied: 01/25/96 SEE PERMIT CB95-1636 . ., Apr/Issue: 02/23/96 Entered By.: RMA Appl/Ownr : BALDWIN, KENNON 65 02/'121`96 0001 01 2 701 B STREET, SIE 200 f.-PRMT 327 ( -. . SAN DIEGO, CA 92101 *** Fees Required **-* ( e1scolilected & Credits ---------------------- / 47 ---- oo( ents: Total Fees: 3 Z. .TotalS%'ymer .: .00 / (nce,,) \ 327 00 Fee description . . . . .. Units Fefly:\ Ext fee, .Data ---- 1952 -------32706 Plan Check Rev'sion eel -:: SP. DATI APPROVAL r - CITY OF- CARLSBAD -. 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 . - .. ., EsGil CorpOration - !'Prbfessio7uil'Plan Review. Engineers. . . DATE:' 2/22/96 '. " ' U AP ICANT JURIS. U FIRE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad U PLAN REVIEWER C3 FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 95-1636 Revisions , SET: II• . . - ' - 'PROJECT ADDRESS: 1979 Palomar Oaks 'Way ' PROJECT NAME: Voluntary Seismic upgrade U' The plans transmitted herewith have been-corrected wher&necessaryand substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. El The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete récheàk. ,The check list transmitted herewith is for your informtion:ThepIan,s are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. " The applicant's copy of the check' list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forwardto the applicant contact person. j The applicant 'scdpy of the check listhás been faxed to: Philip Pape, McGraw/Baldwin Architects' • Fax #: 231-4396 '• .. .. .,. L ' . ' U. Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been cOmpleted. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. - Person contacted: Date contacted (by ) Telephone # U REMARKS: This approval is'for the voluntary seismic upgrade. The building has not been ,revised to fully comply with the 1994 UBC, but the seismic upgrade will improve the seismic performance of the building. By: Pete Fischer - . Enclosures- Esgil. Corporation Li GA 0 CM .Li GP. Li PC 2/20/96 ,, . . trnsmtl.dot - EsGil Corpóratión fProfessiona[fP&znQeview Engineds * DATE: 2/12/96. 'D APPLICANT FIRE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad . 0 PLAN REVIEWER 0 FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 95-1636 Revision SET: I - PROJECT ADDRESS: 1979 Palomar Oaks Way PROJECT NAME Voluntary Seismic upgrade The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected .where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's *********** codes The plans transmitted herewith will substantially' comply with the jurisdiction's *** ** codes . when minor deficiencies identified belov are resolved and bhecked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies. identified on the enclosed check list and should be corected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. I The checklist transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esil Corporation until-'corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the checklist has been faxed to-. . Philip Pãpe, McGraw/Baldwin Architects , Fax #: 231-4396 • Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. EsgilCorporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: S Date contacted: (by: ) - Telephone #: Ill5 REMARKS:, .- . By: Pete Fischer Enclosures: Esgil Corporation Li GA [] CM []GP - • [] PC 1/29/96 • - trnsmtl.dot - - 5 •. p 4 - 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • -San Diego, California 92123 • (619) 560-1468 • Fax (619).560-1576 -5- • - PLANCHECK NO.: 95-1636 Revision • JURISDICTION: Carlsbad . 3 S OCCUPANCY USE OFF/MANUF/WARE - - TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: NN SPR ACTUAL AREA: S ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA STORIES :-2 HEIGHT OK SPRINKLERS? YES OCCUPANT LOAD 148 REMARKS DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: :. ESGIL CORPORATION: 1/29/96 DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW PLAN REVIEWER Pete Fischer COMPLETED 2/12/96 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ) This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state, laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review - is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department You may have other corrections -based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit 3 ' Code sections cited are based on the 1994 UBC The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per the 1994 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed u e, plan sheet number specification section etc Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans I S LIST NO 22 GENERAL COMMERCIAL WITHOUT ENERGY OR POLICY SUPPLEMENTS (1991 UBC) comforw dot Carlsbad 95-1636 Revision ' 2/12/96 ' '1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints, to: Esgil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123, (619) 560-1468. S 2. All sheets of the plans and the first sheet of the calculations are required to be signed by the licensed architect or engineer. Please sign the revised sets. 3. New roof nailing: a) Clearly show on the plans that all new roof nailing in the shaded and hatched areas are a part of this permit. ' by Indicate the nail size and spacing, 3x framing etc. in the shaded and hatched areas on the plans per the calculations. c) Indicate boundary nailing on the new wall tie members such as in details 15, 16 and 17/S33. 4. Show. the HD5A in detail 16/S3.3 from the first bay to the second bay will connect to a 46 with boundary nailing in the second bay. 5. Provide adequate drags at grids 2.5-C and 5-C from the sloping roof to the main roof. For example, detail 8/S3.3 does not show a connection from the new 51/8x15 to. the 51/8x22. 6. Recheck the spacing of the bracing in detail 10/S3.3. There is an error in S • calculation S-29. The bracing should be at the 1/3 points instead of midpoint; 7. • Recheck the new frame as follows: a), Provide lateral bracing for the new steel beam in detail 4/S3.3. S • b) Reference detail 1/S3.3 to the plans. S c) Recheck the bolt spacing in calculation sheet S-i 3.• The capacity of 6 bolts at 3.58 K/bolt is only 21 K, which is less than the required 64 K. ' To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each • correction' item has been addressed,' i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc; '. S , • Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. • S •• Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: Yes U No U' ' 10. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact. Pete Fischer at Esgil Corporation at (619) 560-1468. Thank you. BUILDING PORTION BUILDING AREA VALUATION : t' VALUE Seismic Upgrade 3 Hours 108.94 . '326.82, I - - 1'• - - - - Air _Conditioning , Fire Sprinklers I TOTAL VALUE II 4, ' * - ,. C,, ' -. -- -. -a- • V t t 1, -' -• .'- * H. •- S 4 - - * -4 PLANNING/ENGINEERING APPROVALS " 4.- ' ' S ' ' , - '- '' - -, ', •••. - ••"• a ,*, " PERMIT NUMBER CB % DATE ADDRESS &JZJ, 1 4 RESIDENTIAL 71 TENANT IMPROVEMENT ' .'. - ' r , 4 - ', ,1 - - -4 RESIDENTIAL ADDITION MINOR PLAZA CAMINO REAL. (<$10,000 00) * -4 5 - S - S - '• - VILLAGE FAIRE 4 ft __ - S • "a a • - -. - • - - 1 .• ', • :--' . . S C0MPLEOFFICE BUILDING -a * 4 -- .• OTHER + 7H PLANNER DATE '-I '-• :.- -. -4 I'. .4 .. . •. . . * - - S • - - - -. I f • - . - - - ,, : - - a - - :. - • ENGINEEà) D#AT C \WP51\FILES\BLDGFRM I Rev 11/15/90' - --. . 5".-. 4 • A • 4 4,. - . . - . - 4. -. 1 . S - -- - - ' -.:- ' , I - - ..,4. PLANNThIG CHECIGIV Plan check No Address 1 7? P O J Planner -DAVID RICK ' H ' Phone 438-1161 ext. 4328 (Name) APN Type. of Project and Use Zone N\ Facilities Management Zone ' S CFD(in/i # circle (Wproperry in, complete SPECIAL TAX CALCULATION WORKSHEET provided by Building Department) zd S .5, [tern Complete (jI [tern Incomplete . Needs your action' 1,2,3 Number in circle indicates plancheck number where deficiency was .identified.' •. Environnintal Review Required. YES ___.,.-NO TYPE DATE OF COMPLETION: Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action Conditions of Approval . CJ-CJ 0 Disaetionazy Action Required.- YES NO APP RovAwREso; NO. DATE: - PROJECT NO.._______ ,, S OTHER RELATED CASES: -. 'Conditions with condions of approval? If not, state -conditions which require' action. Conditions of Approval . Ca1ika Col Commisdon Pt Reçnre AS - NO DATE OF APPROVAL; San Diego Coast District,, 3111 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 200, San Diego, CA. 92108-1725 619 521-8036 \ Compliance with conditions of. approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval 5 - - - - ii., ;-. - + ' 1 . - -..+ - -- -. _ 4• • -.. • I Cl: f7 f7 Inclusionary Housmg Fee re YES NO (Effective date of Inci.lusionaxy H&isui&Ordinance May, — Site . :, - , - -. I • -. 1 c 0 0 iD 1 Provide a fully irninsioned ate rplIt drawn to scale Show North 'prarow, opertyTh.he, easements, existing and proposed structi.ires, streets, ,existing street improvements, right-of-way width, dimensioned, setbacks4andex1ting tdpograph.acal lines 4 L r 0 0 0 2 Provide legal description of property, and assessor's parcel n(imber - .fl '.flfl •-.'-- :. . fit •' Zoning 4 4I:)II - , - -- • • . -fi. ..- . - •-••.-. -- : '••,--- );r '. , 0 0 0 •- 1 Setbacks fl, -. '-fl-fl .- . - •+• .. ,. -:- - Front Required Shown [nt Side Required Shown Street Side 'Required Shown Rear: . 'Required?.'-- Shown'—_____ O 0 0 2 Lot coverage Requird : Showi -; I !'--- • Cl 0 01 3 Height I Required I ' ShoAll wTt 0 Cl 0 4 Parking Spaces Required Shown' Guest Spaces Required: - Shown, -. Cl O0 AdotilCornxnents - -I -- ,. - . ' -,• • . - ,+: •- - • - - . •fl •• - •• -; - M 4 - . I > -- - - .. -. - - la -: .OK'-TO[SSUE'AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COiu E — DATE rb - +4 4' I - - •. : - . - . fi• -;-'.. 4 )-.- fi. '-• * - -- •. -. -.: • I I. - - - - - - -. - 1•-'- • fl • •Ifl ' Is - - • - fl.• fl-fl - -- - . •. - • - . PCKF . - - -- - • 1• • - • - • - t •- -. fi •I4_ fl• -. - I • . '4 , S.; City of Carlsbad 95257 Fire Department Bureau of Prevention Plan Review Requirements Category Building Plan Check- Date of Report Wednesday March 6 1996 Reviewed by:. y C 7ë&22IL2 Contact Name Kennon Baldwin 'Sf Addresà 701 B Street Ste 200 City, State San Diego CA 92101 -Sf DfTNo 9 5-16 36 Planning No.'. Job Name Schumacher Job Address 1979 Palomar Oaks Ste or Bldg No Sf S Approved — The item you have submitted for review has been approved The approval is -based on' plans; information- and/or specifications provided, in your subnitthl;. therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifica- tions, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements D Disapproved — Please see the attached report of deficiencies Please make corrections to - plans or specifications necessarto indicate compliance with applicable, codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. I -: -• ' S - -. .5 - Sf -- I 45s .5 Sf - -. 5. • t-or t-ire -L)epartment Use Vniy Review 1st 2nd 3rd Other Agency ID CFDJob# 95257 - Filé#'-_- I . -J - r cL H I -'-