HomeMy WebLinkAbout2020 CHESTNUT AVE; ; CB993075; Permit09-18-2007
City of Carlsbad
1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008
Commercial/Industrial Permit Permit No: CB993075
Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725
Job Address:
Permit Type:
Parcel No:
Valuation:
Occupancy Group:
Project Title:
2020 CHESTNUT AV CBAD
COMMIND
2053302600
$89,052.00
6
PILGRIM CHURCH
MEETING ROOM 1086 SF
Sub Type: COMM
Lot #: 0
Construction Type: VN
Reference #:
Applicant:
WORTHING INC, B. A.
690 CARLSBAD VILLAGE DR
CARLSBAD, CA 92008 92008
619-729-3965
Status:
Applied:
Entered By:
Plan Approved:
Issued:
Inspect Area:
Plan Checktt:
Owner:
PILGRIM UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST
2020 CHESTNUT AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
\NDOND
087T67'19£
JM
Building Permit
Add! Building Permit Fee
Plan Check
Add'l Plan Check Fee
Plan Check Discount
Strong Motion Fee
Park Fee
LFM Fee
Bridge Fee
BTD #2 Fee
BTD #3 Fee
Renewal Fee
Add'l Renewal Fee
Other Building Fee
Pot. Water Con. Fee
Meter Size
Add'l Pot. Water Con. Fee
Reel. Water Con. Fee
$577.53
$0.00
$375.39
$0.00
$0.00
$18.70
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Meter Size
Add'l Reel. Water Con. Fee
Meter Fee
SDCWA Fee
CFD Payoff Fee
PFF (3105540)
PFF (4305540)
License Tax (31 041 93)
License Tax (43041 93)
Traffic Impact Fee (3105541)
Traffic Impact Fee (4305541)
PLUMBING TOTAL
ELECTRICAL TOTAL
MECHANICAL TOTAL
Master Drainage Fee
Sewer Fee
Redev Parking Fee
Additional Fees
HMP Fee
TOTAL PERMIT FEES
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$400.40
$369.60
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$1,112.40
$0.00
$0.00
??
$2,854.02
Total Fees:$2,854.02 Total Payments To Date:$375.39 Balance Due:$2,478.63
Inspector:
FINAL APPROVAL
Date:Clearance:
NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "Imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively
referred to as "fees/exactions." You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must
follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for
processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack,
review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition.
You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity
changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project. NOR DOES IT APPLY to any
fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired.
PERMIT APPLICATION
CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT
2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad CA 92009
(760)438-1161
1, PROJECT INFORMATION
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
PLAN CHECK N(
EST. VAL.
Plan Ck.
Validated
Date
Address (include Bldg/Suite tt Business Name (at this address)
Legal Description Lot No.Subdivision Name/Number Unit No.Phase No.Total # of units
Assessor's Parcel #Existing Use Proposed Use
Description of Work - FT.#of Stories
2. CONTACT PERSON (if different from applicant) ['C-PRHT 375.39
Name Address City
3. 'APPLICANT £3^Contractor Q Agent for Contractor [3 Owner O Agent for Owner
B.A. WORTHING INC. P.O. BOX 1041 CARLSBAD. CA.
State/Zip Telephone #Fax #
760-729-3965
Name Address City State/Zip Telephone #
Name Address City State/Zip Telephone #
5. CONTRACTOR - COMPANY NAME
(Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its
issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law
[Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code] or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged
exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars [$500]).
B.A. WORTHING TNf .
Name
State License # 398764
ppnr>j<g WnPTHING P 0
Designer Name " "
State License # B- 1 392894
P,0, ROY 1
Address
License Class
_ i n/| 1
1041 ("APLSBAD fa (Q9Q18 7fin_7?Q_7Qf;R
'City ' STate/Zip Telephone #
B— 1 City Business License # YES
pTvrjTopvvr-i /-i TV 0' ° fl 1 fl 7 f-i D 7 "> H ° 0 ^ Rv^.JA.L.^^rtij, Ui-i .Cit^. *. U I U State/Zip UU Telephone-1 J ° 3
Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations:
l~l I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance
of the work for which this permit is issued.
P<[" I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is
issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are:
Insurance Company grpZ\TE FUND Policy No-2 2 9 - 9 8 Unit 6537 ExPiration Pate 1 - 1 - 0 Q
(THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS [$100] OR LESS)
l~l CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as
to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California.
WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred
thousand dollars ($100,QpO), irvaddition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor.code, interest and attorney's fees.
SIGNATURE -^^jOffW^^^ DATE
7— OWNER-BUILDER DECLARATION I
I hereby affirm that I am exempt from tlje Contractor's License Law for the following reason:
l~l I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale
(Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does
such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is
sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale).
l~l I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The
Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed
pursuant to the Contractor's License Law).
l~l I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason:
1. I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. l~l YES QNO
2. I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work.
3. I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number):
4. I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone
number / contractors license number):
5. I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type
of work):
PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE DATE
COMPLETE THIS SECTION FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMITS ONLY
Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention
program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? Q YES O NO
Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? Q YES d NO
Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? l~l YES Q NO
IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE
REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT.
8, CONSTRUCTION LENDING AGENCY
I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097(i) Civil Code).
LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS
3; APPLICANT CERTIFICATION :
I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all
City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the City of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned
property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES,
JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT.
OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height.
EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the Building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or
work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 365 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended
or abandoned at any time after the work is^rammenised for a period of 180 days (Section 106.4.4 Uniform Building Code).
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE -^KLMOv^V0 3t DATE
E: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance
City of Carlsbad
Building Department
06/12/2000
WORTHING INC, B. A.
690 CARLSBAD VILLAGE DR
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
Re:
Application Date: 8/16/1999
Plan Check #: CB993075
Address: 2020 CHESTNUT AV
Expiration Date: 8/15/2000
You applied to have your plans checked on the date noted above. To date, the related
building permit has not been obtained. The original plan review application will expire as
no building permit has been issued.
Plans submitted and not retrieved from the building department prior to the plan check
expiration date noted above will be destroyed.
The provisions of sections 304 (d) of the Uniform Building Code state:
"Section 304 9d) Expiration of Plan Review
Applications for which no permit is issued within one year following the date
of application shall expire by limitation, and plans and other data submitted
for review may thereafter be returned to the applicant or destroyed by the
Building Official.
In order to renew action on an application after expiration, the applicant shall
resubmit plans and pay a new plan review fee."
In order to provide better service, please indicate your handling choice for the plans
originally submitted and return this letter to the Building Department.
Project Abandoned - I will pick up plans within 10 days
Project Abandoned - Plans may be destroyed.
If you have any questions, please contact the Building Department at (760) 602-2718.
Raenette Abbey
Building Department
1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-270O • FAX (760) 602-8560
EsGii Corporation
In Partners Hip witft Qove.rnme.nt for 'BuiCtCing Safety
DATE: June 15, 2000 O^EELJANT
JURISDICTION: Carlsbad a PLAN REVIEWER
a FILE
PLAN CHECK NO.: 99-3075 SET: II
PROJECT ADDRESS: 2020 Chestnut Ave.
PROJECT NAME: Pilgrim United Church of Christ Meeting Room Addition
I | The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply
with the jurisdiction's building codes.
The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes
when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff.
The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list
and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck.
XI The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil
Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck.
The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant
contact person.
The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to:
B.A. Worthing Inc.
P.O. Box 1041 Carlsbad 92018 Fax:(760)729-0784
XI Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
Person contacted: Telephone #:
Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #:
Mail Telephone Fax In Person
REMARKS:
By: Kurt Culver Enclosures:
Esgil Corporation
D GA D MB D EJ D PC 6/8/00 tmsmtl.dot
9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 4 (858)560-1468 4 Fax (858) 560-1576
Carlsbad 99-3075
June 15, 2000
RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST
JURISDICTION: Carlsbad
PROJECT ADDRESS: 2020 Chestnut Ave.
DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY
ESGIL CORPORATION: 6/8/00
REVIEWED BY: Kurt Culver
PLAN CHECK NO.: 99-3075
SET: II
DATE RECHECK COMPLETED:
June 15, 2000
FOREWORD (PLEASE READ):
This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform
Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical
Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled
access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department.
You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the
Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments.
The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be
satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations.
Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not
permit the violation of any state, county or city law.
A. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the
plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this
sheet with the revised plans.
B. The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews. The
original correction number has been given for your reference. In case you did not
keep a copy of the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing
the outstanding corrections. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding
these items.
C. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a
result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe
them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not
resulting from this list?
UYes QNo
Carlsbad 99-3075
June 15, 20OO
GENERAL
1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction
list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans
for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be
submitted in one of two ways:
1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of
Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760)
602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad
Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments.
2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation,
9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468.
Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of
Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire
Departments.
NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be
reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by
EsGil Corporation is complete.
EXITS
11. Exit doors should swing in the direction of exit travel when serving any
hazardous area or when the area served has an occupant load of 50 or more.
Section 1003.3.1.5. ALL OF THE DOORS AT THE MEETING ROOM MUST
SWING OUTWARD (NOT JUST THE DESIGNATED EXIT DOORS). SEE
SECTION 1003.3.1.1.
12. Exit doors from Group A occupancies shall not be provided with a latch or lock
unless it is panic hardware. Section 1007. SHOW THIS FOR ALL OF THE
DOORS AT THE MEETING ROOM. SECTION 1003.3.1.1.
15. Exit signs are required whenever two exits are required. Show all required exit
sign locations. Section 1003.2.8.2. IF THE PARTITION BETWEEN ROOMS 1
AND 2 IS CLOSED, THE REMAINING OPEN ROOM (COMBINATION OF
ROOMS 2 AND 3) MUST HAVE TWO EXITS. SIMILARLY, SEE THE
COMBINATION OF ROOMS 1 AND 2.
18. Show separate sources of power for exit illumination. (Occupant load exceeds
99). Section 1003.2.9.2. THE OCCUPANT LOAD IS 101.
Carlsbad 99-3075
June 15, 2000
CORRIDORS
19. Doors should not project more than 7 inches into the required corridor or hallway
width when fully opened, nor more than one-half of the required corridor width
when in any position. Section 1004.3. THIS WILL APPLY ONCE
CORRECTION 11 IS RESOLVED.
20. Corridors shall have walls and ceilings of one-hour construction. Chapter 10.
SEE THE DISCUSSION AT CORRECTION 15. THE CORRIDOR MUST BE
FIRE RATED.
21. Provide a complete architectural section of the corridor, showing all fire-resistive
materials and details of construction for all floor, walls, roof and all penetrations.
Section 1004.3.4.
22. Exit corridors shall not be interrupted by intervening rooms. Foyers, lobbies or
reception rooms constructed as for corridors shall not be construed as
intervening rooms. Section 1004.3.4.4.
23. When two exits are required, dead end corridors are limited to 20 feet. Section
1004.2.6.
24. Corridors shall have interior door openings protected by tight-fitting smoke and
draft control assemblies rated 20 minutes. Doors shall be maintained
self-closing or be automatic closing by action of a smoke detector per Section
713.2. Doors shall be gasketed to provide a smoke and draft seal where the door
meets the stop on sides and top. Section 1004.3.4.3.2.1.
25. Duct penetrations of fire-rated corridor construction shall have smoke and fire
dampers per Sections 713.10 and 713.11.
FOUNDATION
32. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan,
grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been
determined that the recommendations in the soil report are properly incorporated
into the plans. (Whon required by the soil report).
33. The following anchor bolt requirements shall apply in Seismic Zones 3 and 4, per
Section 1806.6.1:
a) Plate washers (minimum size of 2" x 2" x 3/16") shall be used on each anchor
bolt. PLEASE SHOW IT AT DETAIL AA/3.
Carlsbad 99-3O75
June 15,2000
STRUCTURAL
34. Provide minimum structural specifications on the plans to show that all structural
materials will comply with the design calculations and building code
requirements.
35. The existing wall between Room 1 and Room 2 is being removed: This will have
a large impact on the chord forces (from lateral loads) for this building. Please
provide calculations to investigate this. REVISE THE SEISMIC EQUATIONS
TO USE THE 1997 UBC (NOT THE 1994 UBC).
TITLE 24 DISABLED ACCESS
38. Provide notes and details on the plans to show compliance with the enclosed
Disabled Access Review List. Disabled access requirements may be more
restrictive than the UBC.
ADDITIONAL
41. On the electrical plans, show the existing & new loads on the existing service.
Additionally, identify where the new sub-panel is fed from.
42. Please clarify all the various uses that the addition may be used for: If children
will be present, the # of hours per week, the # of hours per day, etc. All of this is
needed to properly classify the use. Please refer to UBC Ch. 3 for a general
discussion. IF NO CHILDREN WILL BE PRESENT (AS YOU STATED),
PLEASE MAKE THIS CLEAR ON THE PLANS.
44. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a
result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly
describe them and where they are located in the plans.
Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list?
Please indicate: fJ Yes Q No
PLEASE ADVISE THE CITY OF THE ADDED FLOOR AREA (KITCHEN).
The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake
Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of
858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any
questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Kurt Culver at
Esgil Corporation. Thank you.
Carlsbad 99-3O75
June 15, 2000
DEPARTMENT OF STATE ARCHITECT NON RESIDENTIAL
TITLE 24 DISABLED ACCESS REQUIREMENTS
REMODELS. ADDITIONS AND REPAIRS
1. The restrooms that "serve the remodeled area" must be shown to comply with
current Title 24 provisions:
a) The site plan shows these restrooms to be in an adjoining building. If there are
any restrooms in the existing multi-purpose building (or church), those are the
ones that must be shown to comply.
b) Wherever the restrooms area, provide a floor plan blow-up to show compliance.
I DID NOT UNDERSTAND YOUR RESPONSE TO THIS CORRECTION.
DOORS
6. Revise plans to show that the minimum strike edge distances are provided at the
level area on the side to which a door (or a gate) swings, per Section 1133B.2.4.3.
a) >18" at interior conditions. SEE THE DOOR FROM ROOM 1 TO THE
CORRIDOR (AND SIMILAR). THIS WILL APPLY ONCE THE DOOR SWINGS
ARE CHANGED.
SIGNAGE
7. Provide a note on the plans stating that the signage requirements of Section
1117B.5 will be satisfied.
GROUP A OCCUPANCIES
8. Note that assistive listening device systems shall be installed in the following use
areas for people with hearing impairments, per Section 1104B.2;
Assembly areas.
Conference and meeting rooms.
Similar areas.
The number of personal receivers required to be available shall be equal to 4% of the
total seats provided, but £2.
EsGil Corporation
In Partnership u>itn government for Quitting Safety
DATE: August 31, 1999 Q APPLICANT
JURISDICTION: Carlsbad O~TCAfTREVIEWER
a FILE
PLAN CHECK NO.: 99-3075 SET: I
PROJECT ADDRESS: 2020 Chestnut Ave.
PROJECT NAME: Pilgrim United Church of Christ Meeting Room Addition
| The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply
with the jurisdiction's building codes.
| | The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes
when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff.
| | The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list
and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck.
2<J The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil
Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck.
| | The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant
contact person.
XI The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to:
B.A. Worthing Inc.
P.O. Box 1041 Carlsbad 92018 Fax:(760)729-0784
Xl Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
Person contacted: Telephoned:
Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #:
Mail Telephone Fax In Person
REMARKS: -
By: Kurt Culver Enclosures:
Esgil Corporation
D GA D MB G EJ Q PC 8/19/99 tmsmtl.dot
9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 4 San Diego, California 92123 4 (858)560-1468 4 Fax (858) 560-1576
Carlsbad 99-3075
August 31, 1999
PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST
COMMERCIAL
PLAN CHECK NO.: 99-3075
OCCUPANCY: A-3
TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: ?
ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA: to be
determined
SPRINKLERS?: ?
REMARKS:
DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY
JURISDICTION: 8/16/99
DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW
COMPLETED: August 31, 1999
JURISDICTION: Carlsbad
USE: Meeting
ACTUAL AREA: +1086
STORIES: 1
HEIGHT: -12'
OCCUPANT LOAD: +-150
DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY
ESGIL CORPORATION: 8/19/99
PLAN REVIEWER: Kurt Culver
FOREWORD (PLEASE READ):
This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code,
Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws
regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review
is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections
based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department,
Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required
prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Code sections cited are based on the 1997 UBC.
The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. -All items must be satisfied
before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3,
1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any
state, county or city law.
To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each
correction item has been addressed, i.e.. plan sheet number, specification section, etc.
Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans.
Carlsbad 99-3075
August 31, 1999
• GENERAL
• Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list.
Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for
residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in
one of two ways:
1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of
Carlsbad Building Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92009, (760)
438-1161. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad
Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments.
2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation,
9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver
all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad
Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments.
NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed
by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil
Corporation is complete.
• PLANS
1. All sheets of the plans and the first sheet of the calculations are required to be
signed by the California licensed architect or engineer responsible for the plan
preparation. Please include the California license number, seal, date of license
expiration and the date the plans are signed. Business and Professions Code.
2. Provide the names, addresses and telephone numbers of the owner and the
responsible design professionals on the Title Sheet. Sec. 106.3.3.
3. Provide a Building Code Data Legend on the Title Sheet. Include the following
code information for each building proposed:
• Occupancy Group
• Description of Use
* Type of Construction
* Sprinklers: Yes or No
• Stories
4 Height
* Floor Area
4 Justification to exceed allowable area in Table 5-B.
4. Provide a statement on the Title Sheet of the plans that this project shall comply
with Title 24 and the 1997 UBC, UMC and UPC and the 1996 NEC.
5. General floor plans of the existing portions will be required (to see the impact of
the new on the existing, and vice versa).
Carlsbad 99-3075
August 31, 1999
• BUILDING AREA
6. As shown, the building(s) is/are over area for the Type of Construction shown.
Table 5-B.
• EXITS
7. Please provide a general exit plan of the existing portion of the building (to verify
that the addition doesn't adversely affect the exiting there).
8. In areas where the occupant load is at least 50, two exits are required.
Table 10-A.
a) Please identify the required exits for the meeting rooms (all three), and
show the exit path ultimately leading to the exterior.
9. Exits should have a minimum separation of one-half the maximum overall
diagonal dimension of the building or area served. Section 1004.2.4.
10. Rooms with 10 or more occupants may have one exit through one adjoining
room. Section 1004.2.2.
a) Based on this requirement, it appears that Rooms 2 and 3 exit into an
area that must be classified as a "corridor." Corrections further in this list
are based on this.
11. Exit doors should swing in the direction of exit travel when serving any
hazardous area or when the area served has an occupant load of 50 or more.
Section 1003.3.1.5.
12. Exit doors from Group A occupancies shall not be provided with a latch or lock
unless it is panic hardware. Section 1007.
13. All doors and gates, within the exit path from Group A occupancies to a public
way, shall not be provided with latches or locks unless they are equipped with
panic hardware. Section 1003.3.2.2.
14. When additional doors are provided for egress purposes, they shall conform to
the width, swing and hardware provisions in Chapter 10., Section 1003.3.1.1.
15. Exit signs are required whenever two exits are required. Show all required exit
sign locations. Section 1003.2.8.2.
16. Show two sources of power for the lamps at exit signs. Section 1003.2.8.5.
17. Show that exits are lighted with at least one foot candle at floor level. Section
1003.2.9.2.
Carlsbad 99-3075
August 31, 1999
18. Show separate sources of power for exit illumination. (Occupant load exceeds
99). Section 1003.2.9.2.
• CORRIDORS
19. Doors should not project more than 7 inches into the required corridor or hallway
width when fully opened, nor more than one-half of the required corridor width
when in any position. Section 1004.3.
20. Corridors shall have walls and ceilings of one-hour construction. Chapter 10.
21. Provide a complete architectural section of the corridor, showing all fire-resistive
materials and details of construction for all floor, walls, roof and all penetrations.
Section 1004.3.4.
22. Exit corridors shall not be interrupted by intervening rooms. Foyers, lobbies or
reception rooms constructed as for corridors shall not be construed as
intervening rooms. Section 1004.3.4.4.
23. When two exits are required, dead end corridors are limited to 20 feet. Section
1004.2.6.
24. Corridors shall have interior door openings protected by tight-fitting smoke and
draft control assemblies rated 20 minutes. Doors shall be maintained
self-closing or be automatic closing by action of a smoke detector per Section
713.2. Doors shall be gasketed to provide a smoke and draft seal where the door
meets the stop on sides and top. Section 1004.3.4.3.2.1.
25. Duct penetrations of fire-rated corridor construction shall have smoke and fire
dampers per Sections 713.10 and 713.11.
• ROOFS
26. A Class A roof covering is required, per City ordinance.
27. Specify on the plans the following information for the roof materials, per Section
106.3.3:
a) Manufacturer's name.
b) Product name/number.
c) ICBO approval number, or equal.
Carlsbad 99-3075
August 31, 1999
• FOUNDATION
28. Provide a copy of the project soil report prepared by a California licensed
architect or civil engineer. The report shall include foundation design
recommendations based on the engineer's findings and shall comply with UBC
Section 1804. A SOILS REPORT MUST BE PROVIDED, PER CITY POLICY.
29. In Seismic Zone 4, each site shall be assigned a near-source factor. Identify this
value in the soils report and on the plans. Section 1629.4.2.
30. Specify on the foundation plan or structural specifications sheet the soil
classification, the soils expansion index and the design bearing capacity of the
foundation. Section 106.3.3.
31. Investigate the potential for seismically induced soil liquefaction and soil
instability in seismic zones 3 and 4. Section 1804.5
32. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan,
grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been
determined that the recommendations in the soil report are properly incorporated
into the plans. (When required by the soil report).
33. The following anchor bolt requirements shall apply in Seismic Zones 3 and 4, per
Section 1806.6.1:
a) Plate washers (minimum size of 2" x 2" x 3/16") shall be used on each
anchor bolt.
• STRUCTURAL
34. Provide minimum structural specifications on the plans to show that all structural
materials will comply with the design calculations and building code
requirements.
35. The existing wall between Room 1 and Room 2 is being removed: This will have
a large impact on the chord forces (from lateral loads) for this building. Please
provide calculations to investigate this.
36. Since the addition does not qualify as conventionally framed, please provide
lateral load calculations.
37. Truss I.D. #'s were put on the plans, but no truss calculations were provided.
Please submit them.
Carlsbad 99-3075
August 31, 1999
• TITLE 24 DISABLED ACCESS
38. Provide notes and details on the plans to show compliance with the enclosed
Disabled Access Review List. Disabled access requirements may be more
restrictive than the UBC.
• ENERGY CONSERVATION
39. Provide plans, calculations and worksheets to show compliance with current
energy standards. Provide the completed ENV-, LTG-, and MECH- forms
showing energy compliance.
a) CF-1R forms are shown on the plans: These apply to residential
construction only!
40. The completed and signed ENV-1, LTG-1, and MECH-1 forms must be imprinted
on the plans.
• ADDITIONAL
41. On the electrical plans, show the existing & new loads on the existing service.
Additionally, identify where the new sub-panel is fed from.
42. Please clarify all the various uses that the addition may be used for: If children
will be present, the # of hours per week, the # of hours per day, etc. All of this is
needed to properly classify the use. Please refer to UBC Ch. 3 for a general
discussion.
43. To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each
correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number,
calculation page, etc.
44. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a
result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly
describe them and where they are located in the plans.
Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list?
Please indicate:
Q Yes Q No
45. The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320
Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of
858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any
questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Kurt Culver at
Esgil Corporation. Thank you.
Carlsbad 99-3075
August 31, 1999
DEPARTMENT OF STATE ARCHITECT NON RESIDENTIAL
TITLE 24 DISABLED ACCESS REQUIREMENTS
• REMODELS. ADDITIONS AND REPAIRS
1. The restrooms that "serve the remodeled area" must be shown to comply with
current Title 24 provisions:
a) The site plan shows these restrooms to be in an adjoining building. If there
are any restrooms in the existing multi-purpose building (or church), those
are the ones that must be shown to comply.
b) Wherever the restrooms area, provide a floor plan blow-up to show
compliance.
2. Show information regarding the path of travel from the complying parking stalls to
the addition (slopes, rails, etc.).
3. Show if the existing parking complies.
• DOORS
4. Show, or note, that there is a level floor or landing on each side of all doors. The
floor or landing is to be ^Vz lower than the doorway threshold, per Section
1133.2.4.1.
5. Show or note that all hand-activated door opening hardware meets the following
requirements, per Section 1133B.2.5.1:
a) Is to be centered >30" but <44" above floor.
b) Latching, or locking, doors in a path of travel are operated with a single
effort by:
i) Lever type hardware.
ii) Panic bars.
iii) Push-pull activating bars.
iv) Or other hardware designed to provide passage without the
requirement to grasp the hardware.
6. Revise plans to show that the minimum strike edge distances are provided at the
level area on the side to which a door (or a gate) swings, per Section 1133B.2.4.3.
a) >18" at interior conditions. SEE THE DOOR FROM ROOM 1 TO THE
CORRIDOR (AND SIMILAR).
b) >12" on the push side, if the door has both a latch and a closer.
Carlsbad 99-3075
August 31, 1999
• SIGNAGE
7. Provide a note on the plans stating that the signage requirements of Section
1117B.5 will be satisfied.
GROUP A OCCUPANCIES
8. Note that assistive listening device systems shall be installed in the following use
areas for people with hearing impairments, per Section 1104B.2;
a) Assembly areas.
b) Conference and meeting rooms.
c) Similar areas.
d) The number of personal receivers required to be available shall be equal to
4% of the total seats provided, but <2.
END
Carlsbad 99-3075
August 31, 1999
JURISDICTION: Carlsbad
VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE
PREPARED BY: Kurt Culver
BUILDING ADDRESS: 2020 Chestnut Ave.
BUILDING OCCUPANCY: A3
PLAN CHECK NO.: 99-3075
DATE: August 31, 1999
TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V-N
BUILDING PORTION
Church Addition
Air Conditioning
Fire Sprinklers
TOTAL VALUE
BUILDING AREA
(ft.2)
1086
VALUATION
MULTIPLIER
VALUE
($)
89052
(perapplic.)
89,052
D 199 UBC Building Permit Fee [X] Bldg. Permit Fee by ordinance: $ 577.33
n 199 UBC Plan Check Fee [><] Plan Check Fee by ordinance: $ 375.26
Type of Review: [X] Complete Review Q] Structural Only Q] Hourly
Q Repetitive Fee Applicable Q Other:
Esgil Plan Review Fee: $ 300.21
Comments:
Sheet 1 of 1
macvalue.doc 5196
-4
City of Carlsbad
^ ^••^^^^••^^^^^•'•••V^i^^^HMMB^BMEngineering Department
DATE:
BUILDING Al
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
PLANCHECK NO.: CB
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER:
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
APPROVAL
The item you have submitted for review has been
approved. The approval is based on plans,
information and/or specifications provided in your
submittal; therefore any changes to these items after
this date, Including field modifications, must be
reviewed by this office to insure continued
conformance with applicable codes. Please review
carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply
with instructions in this report can result in
suspension of permit to build.
[A Right-of-Way permit is required prior to
construction of the following improvements:
DENIAL
Please see the attached report of deficiencies
marked with D. Make necessary corrections to plans
or specifications for compliance with applicable
codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or
specifications to this office for review.
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
By:
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
ENGINEERING AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE BUILDING PERMIT:
Date: /O///W
\WrACHMENTS
D Dedication Application
D Dedication Checklist
H Improvement Application
D Improvement Checklist
D Future Improvement Agreement
D Grading Permit Application
D Grading Submittal Checklist
U Right-of-Way Permit Application
[] Right-of-Way Permit Submittal Checklist
and Information Sheet
D Sewer Fee Information Sheet
ENGINEERING DEPT. CONTACT PERSON
Name: JOANNE JUCHNIEWICZ
City of Carlsbad
Address: 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009
Phone: (619)438-1161, ext. 4510
CFD INFORMATION
Parcel Map No:
Lots:
Recordation:
Carlsbad Tract:
A-4
, CA 92009-^576 • (76O) 438-1161 • FAX (76O)
Q
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
SITE PLAN
1 . Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show:
A. North Arrow
B. Existing & Proposed Structures
C. Existing Street Improvements
2. Show on site plan:
D. Property Lines
E. Easements
F. Right-of-Way Width & Adjacent Streets
G. Driveway widths
A. Drainage Patterns
1. Building pad surface drainage must maintain.a minimum slope of one
percent towards an adjoining street or an approved drainage course.
2. ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE: "Finish grade will provide a minimum positive
drainage of 2% to swale 5' away from building."
B. Existing & Proposed Slopes and Topography
3. Include on title sheet:
A. Site address
B. Assessor's Parcel Number
C. Legal Description
For commercial/industrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, include:
total building square footage with the square footage for each different use,
existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing,
warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved.
EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION
DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE
Q Q Q 4a. Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of approval for
Project No.
Q Q Q 4b. All conditions are in compliance. Date:
H:\WORD\DOCS\CHKLST\Building Plancheck Cklst BP0001 Form JJ.doc
iST/
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS
5. Dedication for all street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the building site and any storm
drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and
for remodels with a value at or exceeding $ , pursuant to Carlsbad
Municipal Code Section 18.40.030.
Dedication required as follows:
Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor
prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8 Yz x 11" plat map
and submit with a title report. All easement documents must be approved and
signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. Attached please find an
application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process. Submit the
completed application form with the required checklist items and fees to the
Engineering Department in person. Applications will not be accept by mail or fax.
Dedication completed by: Date:
IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS
6a. All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be
constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the
construction exceeds $ , pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code
Section 18.40.040.
Public improvements required as follows:
Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public
improvement requirements. A registered Civil Engineer must prepare the
appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements
on the attached checklist to the Engineering Department through a separate plan
check process. The completed application form and the requirements on the
checklist must be submitted in person. Applications by mail or fax are not
accepted. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted
and fees paid prior to issuance of building permit.
Improvement Plans signed by: Date:
Q Q Q 6b. Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad
Municipal Code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title report or
current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $ so
we may prepare the necessary Future Improvement Agreement. This agreement
must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a
Building permit.
Future public improvements required as follows:
H:\WORD\DOCS\CHKLST\Buikling Plancheck Cklst BP0001 Form JJ.doc
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
ist,/ ond,/ ord/
Q 6c. Enclosed please find your Future Improvement Agreement. Please return
agreement signed and notarized to the Engineering Department.
Future Improvement Agreement completed by:
Date:
Q 6d. No Public Improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or defective
improvements found adjacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction
of the City Inspector prior to occupancy.
GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section
11.06.030 of the Municipal Code.
Q Q Q 7a. Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading
requirements. Include accurate grading quantities (cut, fill import, export).
Q Q Q 7b. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil
Engineer must be submitted together with the completed application form
attached. NOTE: The Grading Permit must be issued and rough grading
approval obtained prior to issuance of a Building Permit.
Grading Inspector sign off by: Date:
Q Q Q 7c. Graded Pad Certification required. (Note: Pad certification may be required even
if a grading permit is not required.)
Q Q 7d.No Grading Permit required.
Q Q 7e.lf grading is not required, write "No Grading" on plot plan.
MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS
Q Q 8. A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-Way and/or
private work adjacent to the public Right-of-Way. Types of work include, but are
not limited to: street improvements, tree trimming, driveway construction, tieing
into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities.
Right-of-Way permit required for:
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
H:\WORD\DOCS\CHKLST\Building Plancheck Cklst BP0001 Form JJ.doc
1
H st/ pnd/ ord/
Q Q 9. A SEWER PERMIT is required concurrent with the building permit issuance. The
fee is noted in the fees section on the following page.
Q Q 10. INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT If your facility is located in the City of Carlsbad
sewer service area, you need to contact the Carlsbad Municipal Water District,
located at 5950 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008. District personnel can
provide forms and assistance, and will check to see if your business enterprise is
on the EWA Exempt List. You may telephone (760) 438-2722, extension 153, for
assistance.
Industrial Waste permit accepted by:
Date:
Q a 11. NPDES PERMIT
Complies with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant shall provide best
management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to
discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by
the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever
occurs first.
Q 12. lj Required fees are attached
Q No fees required
Q Q Q 13. Additional Comments:
H:\WORD\DOCS\CHKLST\Building Plancheck Cklst BP0001 Form JJ.doc c Re». 12/26W6
D^-Estf
Q Calc
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET
mate based on unconfirmed information from applicant.
Calculation based on building plancheck plan submittal.
Address: &J£)3jr^ Cy^gawo^ J^v^e Bldg. Permit No.;
Prepared by: <J^3 Date: /ry/7'fe Checked by: Date:
EDU CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses.
/o&fe/Types of Use: IA^QXJV^^ &orCv^. Sq. Ft./Units: /1 fie® EDU's:
Types of Use: Sq. Ft./Units: EDU's: _
APT CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses.
Types of Use: vWaavv-^ ftco^ Sq. Ft./Units: //goo toftfe ADT's:
3 ^
Types of Use: _ Sq. Ft./Units: _ ADT's:
FEES REQUIRED:
WITHIN CFD: D YES (no bridge & thoroughfare fee in District f 1. reduced Traffic Impact Fee)
1. PARK-IN-LIEU FEE PARK AREA & #: '
FEE/UNIT: - X NO. UNITS: =$_
2. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE
ADT's/UMTSr c£<£ X FEE/ABTT 3S = $ ' "7 7O
= $fflpNE TRANSPORTATION ADT'S X $10
A r
J^T3. BRIDGE AND THOROUGHFARE FEE
ADT's/UNITS:
fjfa. FACILITIES MANAGEMENT FEE
-• UNIT/SQ.FT.:
(DIST. #1 DIST.
X FEE/ADT:
ZONE:
#2 Dl!
X FEE/SQ.FT./UNIT:
= $
= $
5. SEWER FEE
PERMIT No.
EDU's: > (0O X FEE/EPOT 16$tf = $_
FIT AREA: DRAINAGE BASIN:
EDU's: X FEE/EDU:
6. SEWER LATERAL ($2,500)
7. DRAINAGE FEES PLDA : HIGH /LOW.
ACRES: X FEE/AC:
TOTAL OF ABOVE FEES*: $ / 0#,Q. I/ 0
*NOTE: This calculation sheet is NOT a complete list of ad fees which may be due.
Dedications and Improvements may also be required with Building Permits.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST
Plan Check No. CB
Planner Lt-
APN:
'3O 75 Address
Phone (619) 438-1161, extension
Type of Project & Use:
Zoning: ^" I , General Plan:
CFD (in/out) # /^rDate of participation:
Net Project Density:
Facilities Management Zone: /_
DU/AC
Circle One
Remaining net dev acres:
(For non-residential development: Type of land used created by
this permit: )
D D
D
Legend:X Item Complete
Environmental Review Required:
DATE OF COMPLETION:
Item Incomplete - Needs your action
YES ^NO TYPE
Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action.
Conditions of Approval:
Discretionary Action Required:
APPROVAL/RESO. NO.
PROJECT NO.
YES TYPE
DATE
\
OTHER RELATED CASES:
Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action.
Conditions of Approval:
Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance
Project site located in Coastal Zone? YES
CA Coastal Commission Authority? YES
NO
NO
If California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact them at - 3111 Camino Del Rio North, Suite
200, San Diego CA 92108-1725; (619) 521-8036
Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt):
Coastal Permit Determination Form already completed? YES NO
If NO, complete Coastal Permit Determination Form now.
Coastal Permit Determination Log #:
Follow-Up Actions:
1) Stamp Building Plans as "Exempt" or "Coastal Permit Required" (at minimum
Floor Plans).
2) Complete Coastal Permit Determination Log as needed.
I I [~~| Inclusionary Housing Fee required: YES
(Effective date of Inclusionary Housing Ordinance - May 21, 1993.)
Data Entry Completed? YES NO
(A/P/Ds, Activity Maintenance, enter CB#, toolbar, Screens, Housing Fees, Construct Housing Y/N, Enter Fee, UPDATE!)
D
ODD
Site Plan:
1 . Provide a fully dimensional site plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow,
property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing
street improvements, right-of-way, width, dimensional setbacks and existing
topographical lines.
2. Provide legal description of property and assessor's parcel number.
D D D
Zoning:
1. Setbacks:
Front:
Interior Side:
Street Side:
Rear:
Required
Required
Required
Required
Shown
Shown
Shown
Shown
Q Q 2. Accessory structure setbacks:
Front: Required
Interior Side: Required
Street Side: Required
Rear: Required
Structure separation: Required
Shown
Shown
Shown
Shown
Shown
EH EH . Lot Coverage:Required Shown
D 4- Height:Required Shown
EH EH EH 5. Parking: Spaces Required
Guest Spaces Required
EH EH EH Additional Comments
Shown
Shown
OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER DATE '99u
Carlsbad Fire Department 990013
2560 Orion Way
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Plan Review Requirements Category:
Date of Report: 08/30/1999
Fire Prevention
(760)931-2121
Building Plan
Reviewed by:
Name:
Address:
B. Worthing Plans
PO Box 1041
City, State: Carlsbad CA 92018
Plan Checker:
Job Name: PILGRIM CHURCH
job#: 990013
Job Address: 2020 CHESTNUT AV
Bldg #: CB993075
Ste. or Bldg. No.
Approved The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is
based on plans, information and / or specifications provided in your submittal;
therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field
modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance
with applicable codes and standards. Please review carefully all comments
attached as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in
suspension of permit to construct or install improvements.
Approved The item you have submitted for review has been approved subject to the
Subject to attached conditions. The approval is based on plans, information and/or
specifications provided in your submittal. Please review carefully all comments
attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in
suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. Please resubmit to
this office the necessary plans and / or specifications required to indicate
compliance with applicable codes and standards.
Incomplete The item you have submitted for review is incomplete. At this time, this office
cannot adequately conduct a review to determine compliance with the
applicable codes and / or standards. Please review carefully all comments
attached. Please resubmit the necessary plans and / or specifications to this
office for review and approval.
Review
FD Job#
1st 2nd 3rd
990013 FDFile#
Other Agency ID
UNITETD CHURCH OF CbfRiST
2.0ZQ CH-ESTWUT
, C4
SE1S.KIC -
V
A-DDiTlON)
OUT -"51*
l'x 52.'
(4,2. * 12-0.1
4
9TEUCT
JOIVJ
oe
EXIST
: 'ON XUJ •ONi 'S9THi
a ga 5
1 .-;• r iIHP
$» ®j,mdW
I!? ,
nf I f H^! < i! U?.} |tp •}
&
td 0002 S 'ON XUd 'ONI 'SSTiai "TbdniXldiS : UlO'ad
3390551-
9td 5c:ET 0002 cl "OH Xbd •ONI 'ssnai "wyniDnyis
Sf if S
* *
i i
S
il
€»$•_
M.MQ a«
" i
sis*
e g S a"i^p g
w jy S xs§l i
iu ru tew * 5a Q Aat K la •
> t t
« « c c
•ONI 'ssria-L. "Tbdnionais
as y v » 3
* * "
i
i 1 * Si
S
i§
r
•*at
&
*
-« «
S3
«
'0 * «• w1 S p p
b « a
I & K• 9 f -i -• -i -< ft
3 r(!"?7i
« • » a
z * * «
2d WdT0:T0 'ON XbJ •ONI 'ssridi iwanixiais
s
-1 O O •- (Ujr ^ z Az o o S 3
-i a o o
I ' ' '
ff If II
{ifi f til |Pi
c p
Inj
I•
;l
I
6?
"
i
i.8
CO
s
i- r
II i
; I I I8
i.'-33 ^*
ffiii
•tttftt
I 9 90 8
kb
.-,!
M t* B
ttrt
aistg
&wM»m
t • • • • B
,SliM
; «•»• avTi " c isis?fsl*p§-M|;?"Mill*
ii!Hf"ifi^ ttlWiiM"I? •|4jllu»i
3_ •&3«'*^V±4a5
«R !s^l^ili UfHiHHI I
*
i? xi 1**S li«i »!B811' $Si »ti B«"
I« pit
• fiUeN ' - '
feis
i SlitI
• STRUCTURPL TRUSS, INC.FftX NO. t 17937220436 fipv. 12 2000 12:2dPM PL
TO
a
LJ
'£C3
>-
5
LU
(
1
I
i
J
i\,
ii
!
t
:
j
[i
1
i.|l
I
1C
••T
K
V
TD~
jr
HH
>-<
CP _
Z >-
^ s u
S i ICD r- 2
.- |«- I r1
xl* r^ i«
it -W a
-~- m «-
^ 5 £
j
..
jj
4
3
Jc
3
5
-j
^
5
/
m
CO
CO
a:
CC
cd
to
8
/
.••
^
i\
aLU
i
to
UJ
CD
^^
0
/
N
N
cn
CJ
cd
^.
•w*
m
''
\
iOcnixj
CVI
CD
0
ori —
CO
C%l
03
/
f§^71
y%
CO
CD
a
iTC1—
03
,
1=3
1 —
03
I
1c
f''
x|
S
r\j
•^.
3"
cC^^
j .
>:jj
i
Jjc
vC
^
§c
u
2~
u
<c
uc<^
^
(— •
of
z.
f'
J
L. Lj ra o* ^o u
^ t
J C
-i u
^
D t-
-> t
\
?
\J
3
L._
J
1
3
tp
€irsviations1
—4 (—4
. G
||
£§= ITh— ^-«
kJ J—
|5
1 "-v
if'
\ —
ii
3
u_tj
_j
\.
•oc
i
I
*—
1!
x.
f
t
•!c.
?
J3
-+
-fl
-* <
.3 ,
3
_. :
&>
•'"f
rt
/\
B
c_o
£ ^S 5
U c=
3 on o
w Citf rC-J
•HX tt1 s.ia
I
—
i 3
1 (—
i^
\
\
<
^
N
,.,..„!
ik?
5
al
=
§
^
i—
to
h— 1
5
te
•x.
§
C3
Ul
H^
3
2
1
.-•/
\
CO
($
J^
&
h«*
OJ
^
^^
T.JE
CO
UJ
5
1
,
s
\
— _.
Scc
!-••
O^
Ss
D
^Y^
CO
(2C
/
X
O__l
g
LU
i_j
CO
i
i
s
\
_
•f*t
f*O
""1
o
1
"r"
«*(
c
3
^
|
3
I
c
o_p
"''\
oo1
(Jvi
~f
8'
' 1
If?_ ;^"^
** f ' i
f }—\ I '_D
b ^1
= ==== ::.^-j .< j?s
[
1
t
Std UdS2:cT 0002 21 '
COAST GEOTECHNICAL
CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS
May 10, 2000
Richard Allen
Pilgrim United Church of Christ
2020 Chestnut Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Subject: LIMITED GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
Pilgrim United Church of Christ
Proposed Addition
2020 Chestnut Avenue
Carlsbad, California
Dear Mr. Allen:
In response to your request and in accordance with our Proposal and Agreement dated
April 13, 2000, we have performed a preliminary geotechnical investigation on the subject
site for the proposed addition.
The findings of the investigation, laboratory test results and recommendations for
foundation design are presented in this report.
From a geotechnical point of view, it is our opinion that the site is suitable for the
proposed development, provided the recommendations in this report are implemented
during the design and construction phases.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us at (858) 755-8622. This
opportunity to be of service is appreciated.
Respectfully submitte
COAST GEOTECHN
Mark Burwell, C.E.G.
Engineering Geologist Geotechnical
779 ACADEMY DRIVE • SOLANA BEACH • CALIFORNIA 92075
(858) 755-8622 • FAX (858) 755-9126
7.T
LIMITED GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
Proposed Addition
Pilgrim United Church of Christ
2020 Chestnut Avenue
Carlsbad, California
Prepared For:
Richard Allen
Pilgrim United Church of Christ
2020 Chestnut Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 920O8
May 10, 2000
W.O. P-313040
Prepared By:
COAST GEOTECHNICAL
779 Academy Drive
Solana Beach, California 92075
TABLE OF CONTENTS
VICINITY MAP
INTRODUCTION 5
SITE CONDITIONS 5
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 5
SITE INVESTIGATION 5
LABORATORY TESTING 6
GEOTECHNICAL CONDITIONS 7
CONCLUSIONS 10
RECOMMENDATIONS 11
A. REMOVALS/GRADING/RECOMPACTION 11
B. FOUNDATIONS 11
C. SLABS ON GRADE (INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR) 12
D. SETTLEMENT CHARACTERISTICS 13
E. SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS 13
F. SEISMIC PARAMETERS 14
G. UTILITY TRENCH 14
H. DRAINAGE 15
I. GEOTECHNICAL OBSERVATIONS 15
J. PLAN REVIEW 15
LIMITATIONS 16
REFERENCES 18
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
BORING LOG
TEST PIT LOG
SITE PLAN
APPENDIX B REGIONAL FAULT MAP
EARTHQUAKE FAULT ANALYSIS
APPENDIX C GRADING GUIDELINES
VICINITY MAP
SCALE: 1:10,400
COAST GEOTECHNICAL
Coast Geotechnical May 10, 2000
W.O. P-313040
Page 5
INTRODUCTION
This report presents the results of our geotechnical engineering investigation on the
subject property. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the nature and characteristics
of the surficial deposits underlying the property and their influence on the construction
of the proposed addition.
SITE CONDITIONS
The subject property is located along the northeast corner of Monroe Street and Chestnut
Avenue, in the city of Carlsbad. The site includes a church and associated structures
situated on level to very gently westerly sloping terrain. The property is bounded along
the north and east by developed residential lots.
Vegetation includes residential landscaping consisting of grass and trees along the
southern yard area. Drainage is generally directed to the south by sheet flow.
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
Preliminary plans for the addition were prepared by B. Worthing Design. The project
includes the construction of a single-story addition along the southern portion of the site.
The addition will be supported on conventional footings with a slab on grade floor.
SITE INVESTIGATION
One 3-5 inch diameter exploratory boring was drilled in the side yard area of the site to
Coast Geotechnical May 10, 2000
W.O. P-313040
Page 6
a maximum depth of 8.5 feet. One test pit was excavated adjacent to the existing stem
wall foundation. Earth materials encountered were visually classified and logged by our
field engineering geologist. Relatively undisturbed and bulk samples of earth materials
were obtained at selected intervals. Samples were obtained by driving a thin walled steel
sampler into the desired strata, where possible. The samples are retained in brass rings
of 2.5 inches outside diameter and 1.0 inches in height. The central portion of the
sample is retained in close fitting, waterproof containers and transported to our
laboratory for testing and analysis.
LABORATORY TESTING
Classification
The field classification was verified through laboratory examination, in accordance with
the Unified Soil Classification System. The final classification is shown on the enclosed
Exploratory Logs.
Moisture/Density
The field moisture content and dry unit weight were determined for each of the
undisturbed soil samples. This information is useful in providing a gross picture of the
soil consistency or variation among exploratory excavations. The dry unit weight was
determined in pounds per cubic foot. The field moisture content was determined as a
percentage of the dry unit weight. Both are shown on the enclosed Laboratory Test
Results.
Coast Geotechnical May 10, 2000
W.O. P-313040
Page 7
Maximum Dry Density/Optimum Moisture Content
The maximum dry density and optimum moisture content were determined for selected
samples of earth materials taken from the site. The laboratory standard tests were in
accordance with ASTM D-1557-91- The results of the tests are presented in the
Laboratory Test Results.
GEOTECHNICAL CONDITIONS
The subject property is underlain at relatively shallow depths by Pleistocene terrace
deposits. The terrace deposits are underlain at depth by Eocene-age sedimentary rocks
which have commonly been designated as the Santiago Formation on published geologic
maps. The terrace deposits are overlain by residual soil. A brief description of the earth
materials encountered on the site is discussed below.
Soil
Approximately 2.0 to 3.0 feet of sandy soil was encountered in the exploratory boring and
test pit, respectively. The soil is very damp to wet and consists of silty and fine-grained
sand. Numerous roots are present in the soil profile due to apparent tree removal in the
area of the proposed addition.
Terrace Deposits
Underlying the soil veneer, Pleistocene-age terrace deposits were encountered. The
Coast Geotechnical May 10, 2000
W.O. P-313040
PageS
sedimentary unit is composed of reddish brown, fine and medium-grained, slightly clayey
sand. The terrace deposits are dense but weakly cemented. Regionally, the Pleistocene
sands are considered flat-lying and are underlain at depth by Eocene-age sedimentary
rock units.
Expansive Soil
Based on our experience in the area and previous laboratory testing of selected samples,
the terrace deposits reflect an expansion potential in the low range.
Ground Water
No evidence of perched or high ground water tables were noted during exploration,
however, a wet condition was noted along the soil/terrace deposit contact in Test Pit No.
1. Based on our experience in the area, major ground water related problems are not
anticipated during construction. However, it should be noted that seepage problems can
develop after completion of construction. These seepage problems most often result
from drainage alterations, landscaping and over-irrigation. In the event that seepage or
saturated ground does occur, it has been our experience that they are most effectively
handled on an individual basis.
Tectonic Setting
The site is located within the seismically active southern California region which is
Coast Geotechnical May 10, 2000
W.O. P-313040
Page 9
generally characterized by northwest trending Quaternary-age fault zones. Several of
these fault zones and fault segments are classified as active by the California Division of
Mines and Geology (Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act).
Based on a review of published geologic maps, no known faults transverse the site.
Several steeply dipping short fault segment have been mapped in the regional area of the
site. These northeast trending faults are exposed in the Eocene-age rocks of the Santiago
Formation but not in the overlying Pleistocene terrace deposits and are presumably
inactive.
The nearest active fault is the offshore Rose Canyon Fault Zone located approximately 6.0
miles west of the site. It should be noted that the Rose Canyon Fault is not a continuous,
well-defined feature but rather a zone of right stepping en echelon faults. The complex
series of faults has been referred to as the Offshore Zone of Deformation (Woodward-
Clyde, 1979) and is not fully understood. Several studies suggest that the Newport-
Inglewood and the Rose Canyon faults are a continuous zone of en echelon faults
(Treiman, 1984). Further studies along the complex offshore zone of faulting may
indicate a potentially greater seismic risk than current data suggests. Other faults which
could affect the site include the Coronado Bank, Elsinore, San Jacinto and San Andreas
Faults. The proximity of major faults to the site and site parameters are shown on the
enclosed Earthquake Fault Analysis.
Coast Geotechnical May 10, 2000
W.O. P-313040
Page 10
Liquefaction Potential
Liquefaction is a process by which a sand mass loses its shearing strength completely and
flows. The temporary transformation of the material into a fluid mass is often associated
with ground motion resulting from an earthquake.
Owing to the moderately dense nature of the Pleistocene terrace deposits and the
anticipated depth to ground water, the potential for seismically induced liquefaction and
soil instability is considered low.
CONCLUSIONS
1) The subject lot is located in an area that is relatively free of potential geologic
hazards such as landsliding, deep-canyon fills, ground water and seismically
induced subsidence.
2) The soil encountered on the site is loose, wet and contains numerous roots. The
soil is not suitable for the support of proposed foundations or slabs on grade.
3) The soil should be removed, cleaned of roots and debris, and replaced as properly
compacted fill for foundation and slab support.
4) As an alternative, the footings may be founded into the underlying terrace deposits
Coast Geotechnical May 10, 2000
W.O. P-313040
Page 11
and a structural slab or a raised wood floor may be utilized. Footings would be
on the order of 3.0 to 4.0 feet deep, in this regard.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Removals/Grading/Recompaction
As previously indicated, the root infested soil should be removed to the underlying
terrace deposits. Removals are estimated to range from 2.0 to 3.0 feet. However,
removals should extend to a depth such that a minimum of 1.5 feet of fill is located
beneath the base of proposed footings. Removals should extend a minimum of 5.0 lateral
feet beyond the building footprint. Prior to placement of fill, the base of the excavation
should be observed by this firm. The existing earth deposits are generally suitable for
reuse provided they are cleaned of all roots, vegetation, debris and thoroughly mixed.
Fill should be placed in 6.0 to 8.0 inch loose lifts, moistened as required to 2.0-3.0
percent above optimum moisture, and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of the
laboratory maximum dry density. Additional recommendations will be presented should
any unforeseen conditions be encountered during grading. Imported fill, if necessary,
should be composed of non-expansive granular deposits approved by this firm.
Foundations
The following preliminary design parameters are based on footings founded into
approved compacted fill. Footings for the proposed addition should be a minimum of
Coast Geotechnical May 10, 2000
W.O. P-313040
Page 12
12 inches wide and founded a minimum of 12 inches below the lower most adjacent
subgrade at the time of foundation construction for single-story structures. Footings
should be reinforced with a minimum of four No. 4 bars, two along the top of the footing
and two along the base. Footing recommendations provided herein are based upon
underlying soil conditions and are not intended to be in lieu of the project structural
engineer's design.
For design purposes, an allowable bearing value of 1500 pounds per square foot may be
used for foundations at the recommended footing depths.
The bearing value indicated above is for the total dead and frequently applied live loads.
This value may be increased by 33 percent for short durations of loading, including the
effects of wind and seismic forces.
Resistance to lateral load may be provided by friction acting at the base of foundations
and by passive earth pressure. A coefficient of friction of 0.35 may be used with dead-
load forces. A passive earth pressure of 250 pounds per square foot, per foot of depth
of fill penetrated to a maximum of 1500 pounds per square foot may be used.
Slabs on Grade (Interior and Exterior)
Slabs on grade should be a minimum of 4.0 inches thick and reinforced in both
directions with No. 3 bars placed 18 inches on center in both directions. The slab should
Coast Geotechnical May 10, 2000
W.O. P-313040
Page 13
be underlain by a minimum 4.0-inch sand blanket or the thickness of organic soil
removed. Where moisture sensitive floors are used, a minimum 6.0-mil Visqueen or
equivalent moisture barrier should be placed over the sand blanket and covered by an
additional two inches of sand. Utility trenches underlying the slab may be backfilled with
on-site materials, compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of the laboratory maximum dry
density. Slabs including exterior concrete flatwork should be reinforced as indicated
above and provided with saw cuts/expansion joints, as recommended by the project
structural engineer. All slabs should be cast over dense compacted subgrades free of
organics.
Settlement Characteristics
Estimated total and differential settlement is expected to be on the order of 3/4 inch and
1/2 inch, respectively. It should also be noted that long term secondary settlement due
to irrigation and loads imposed by structures is anticipated to be 1/4 inch.
Seismic Considerations
Although the likelihood of ground rupture on the site is remote, the property will be
exposed to moderate to high levels of ground motion resulting from the release of energy
should an earthquake occur along the numerous known and unknown faults in the
region.
Coast Geotechnical May 10, 2000
W.O. P-313040
Page 15
adjacent footing. This can be accomplished by either deepening the footing, raising the
invert elevation of the utility, or moving the utility or the footing away from one another.
Drainage
Specific drainage patterns should be designed by the project designer. However, in
general, pad water should be directed away from foundations and around the structure
to the street. Roof water should be collected and conducted to hardscape or the street,
via non-erodible devices. Pad water should not be allowed to pond. Vegetation adjacent
to foundations should be avoided. If vegetation in these areas is desired, sealed planter
boxes or drought resistant plants should be considered. Other alternatives may be
available, however, the intent is to reduce moisture from migrating into foundation
subsoils. Irrigation should be limited to that amount necessary to sustain plant life. All
drainage systems should be inspected and cleaned annually, prior to winter rains.
Geotechnical Observations
Structural footing excavations should be observed by a representative of this firm, prior
to the placement of steel and forms. All fill should be placed while a representative of
the geotechnical engineer is present to observe and test.
Plan Review
A copy of the final plans should be submitted to this office for review prior to the
initiation of construction. Additional recommendations may be necessary at that time.
Coast Geotechnlcal May 10, 2000
W.O. P-313040
Page 16
LIMITATIONS
This report is presented with the provision that it is the responsibility of the owner or the
owner's representative to bring the information and recommendations given herein to
the attention of the project's architects and/or engineers so that they maybe incorporated
into plans.
If conditions encountered during construction appear to differ from those described in
this report, our office should be notified so that we may consider whether modifications
are needed. No responsibility for construction compliance with design concepts,
specifications or recommendations given in this report is assumed unless on-site review
is performed during the course of construction.
The subsurface conditions, excavation characteristics and geologic structure described
herein are based on individual exploratory excavations made on the subject properly.
The subsurface conditions, excavation characteristics and geologic structure discussed
should in no way be construed to reflect any variations which may occur among the
exploratory excavations.
Please note that fluctuations in the level of ground water may occur due to variations in
rainfall, temperature and other factors not evident at the time measurements were made
and reported herein. Coast Geotechnical assumes no responsibility for variations which
may occur across the site.
Coast Geotechnical May 10, 2000
W.O. P-313040
Page 17
The conclusions and recommendations of this report apply as of the current date. In
time, however, changes can occur on a property whether caused by acts of man or nature
on this or adjoining properties. Additionally, changes in professional standards may be
brought about by legislation or the expansion of knowledge. Consequently, the
conclusions and recommendations of this report may be rendered wholly or partially
invalid by events beyond our control. This report is therefore subject to review and
should not be relied upon after the passage of two years.
The professional judgments presented herein are founded partly on our assessment of
the technical data gathered, partly on our understanding of the proposed construction
and partly on our general experience in the geotechnical field. Our engineering work
and the judgments given meet present professional standards. However, in no respect
do we guarantee the outcome of the project.
Coast Geotechnical May 10, 2000
W.O. P-313040
Page 18
REFERENCES
1. Petersen, M.D., Bryant, W.A., Cramer, C.H., Cao, T., Reichle, M.S., Frankel, A.D.,
Lienkaemper, J.J., McCrory, P.A., and Schwartz, D.P., 1996, Probabilistic Seismic
Hazard Assessment for the State of California, California Department of
Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology Open File Report 96-08, 59 page.
2. Hays, Walter W., 1980, Procedures for Estimating Earthquake Ground Motions,
Geological Survey Professional Paper 1114, 77 pages.
3. Seed, H.B., and Idriss, I.M., 1970, A Simplified Procedure for Evaluating Soil
Liquefaction Potential: Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
4. Tan, S.S., and Giffen, D.G., 1995, Landslide Hazards in the Northern Part of the
San Diego Metropolitan Area, San Diego County, Plate 35D, Open-File Report 95-
04, Map Scale 1:24,000.
5. Treiman, J.A., 1984, The Rose Canyon Fault Zone, A Review and Analysis,
California Division of Mines and Geology.
MAPS/AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS
1. Aerial Photograph, 1982, Foto-Map D-7, Scale 1"=2000'.
2. California Division of Mines and Geology, 1994, Fault Activity Map of California,
Scale 1"=750,000'.
3. Geologic Map of the Oceanside, San Luis Rey and San Marcos 7.5' Quadrangles,
1996, DMG Open File Report 96-02.
4. U.S.G.S., 7.5 Minute Quadrangle Topographic Map, Digitized, Scale Variable.
I
I
APPENDIX A
LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
TABLE I
Maximum Dry Density and Optimum Moisture Content
(Laboratory Standard ASTM D-1557-91)
Sample
Location
T-l 1.5'-3.5
Max. Dry
Density (pcf]
127.8
Optimum
Optimum Content
10.2
TABLE II
Field Dry Density and Moisture Content
Sample
Location
Field Dry
Density
(pcf)
Field Moisture
Content
B-l @ 1.2
B-l @ 2.0
B-l @ 3.0
B-l @ 5.0
B-l @ 8.0
T-l @ 1.25'
T-l @ 3.0'
105.4
117.9
105.8
Sample Disturbed
Sample Disturbed
128.5
Sample Disturbed
8.2
18.0
16.2
17.0
11.6
12.0
20.0
P-312020
LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING NO. 1
DRILL RIG: PORTABLE BUCKET AUGER PROJECT NO. P-3 13040
BORING DIAMETER: 3.5"
SURF ACE ELEV.: 220'
G
&
>
t!oo
s
><(*Q
105.4
117.9
105.8
—
^b
Z
|
0
fjj
H
59a
8.2
18.0
16.2
17.0
11.6
&
S
$
o<;
VI
V)
Qs
a§
on
^w
05QQ b
0 1
* 1
S<;
^Q
P
O
g
0 1"
11
^O
P
g9
fri
sr^IXs
220.00
0.00
—
—
— 219.00
— 1.00
—
—
— 218.00
2.00
="
—— 217.00
— 3.00
—
— 216.00
— 4.00
— 215.00
5.00
— 214.00
6.00
213.00
7.00
1
212.00
g.OO
c<
DATE DRILLED: 04-27-00
LOGGED BY: MB
33
1<
@
m
fjx
<«jyw
||
"j
i
m>:•:•
gj:
fffm
«{•
P
'Af&i
"S
:?:=:
lEHItHEISSI•{&
•§.
•&
IIH1
SS-its
ixT:
T9f'"
PMi*
IJV>"s35»m
tVtii
M
.V.W.WJA:-:;i->:i:>:-nitiiirtii
EIM$:•:•!IHIIHMf'•••*:-:-xii
•WV.V.V.V.V
^•'™
"Wi
fijifs
in1.•>.•&.?§i.v.v.
^:*J£
P
I
1
pmP-:
S?!"-":p
i?M
y?i
WJULi•>.vX
IIv
"•""•
:SC:Xfevriii
Pifljy
!«»iti^:S!-J
ill
w
Oc«
&
c/i^o
o
d
g
SM
SM
DESCRIPTION
SOIL (Qs): Brown silty sand, v. moist, loose, numerous roots
TERRACE DEPOSITS (Qt): Reddish bm., fine and med.-grained sand,
slightly clayey
From 4'to5', Grey clayey sand lens
END OF BORING @ 8.5'
SHEET i OF i COAST GEOTECHNICAL
LOG OF TEST PIT NO. 1
c/o§Q
Q
O
O
1
1
w
a
Wd
o
220.00
8
O
PROJECT NO.
DATE EXCAVATED:
SURFACE ELEV.:
LOGGED BY:
U
DESCRIPTION
128.5
0.00 SM SOIL (Qs): Brown silty sand, v. moist, loose, slightly clayey
12.0
o
1o
«
Ion
•a
</5
219.00
1.00
218.00
2.00
217.00
20.0 3.00
NOTE: Pit Extended from 2' by 3.5" Boring
@ 3', Wet conditions along Contact
SM TERRACE DEPOSITS (Qt): Reddish bm., fine and med.-grained sand,
slightly clayey
TEST PIT SKETCH
* EXIST. STEM WALL FTG.
RAISED WOOD FLOOR ,
I
/
•>
1
f 15"
A
f
I I
! i
ioJ
PAGE 1 OF 1 COAST GEOTECHNICAL
n+
w
oft
»AST GEOTECHN]£r
Hw3
"d
IT LOCATION i/^^l»•o•a2oX
03o
2
G LOCATION (»•a•a
oM LEGENDOf)
HH
H
W
^t-1
^01
APPENDIX B
..jt W\ V^R^<4:
ti *'i—ifV I'V * -' V I iPvJS'V./i"
{* :':^-J^|H.! JJ^pi
^v v r-^HHl^/<^€/JK'• S^WflL'W1 r*>4
I
I
DATE: Wednesday, May 10, 2000
*************************************
* *
* EQFAULT *
* *
* Ver. 2.20 *
* *
* *
*************************************
(Estimation of Peak Horizontal Acceleration
From Digitized California Faults)
SEARCH PERFORMED FOR: ALLEN
JOB NUMBER: P-313040
JOB NAME: P-313040
SITE COORDINATES:
LATITUDE: 33.1618 N
LONGITUDE: 117.3262 W
SEARCH RADIUS: 60 mi
ATTENUATION RELATION: 2) Campbell & Bozorgnia (1994) Horiz. - Soft Rock
UNCERTAINTY (M=Mean, S=Mean+l-Sigma): S
SCOND: 0
COMPUTE PEAK HORIZONTAL ACCELERATION
FAULT-DATA FILE USED: CDMGSCE.DAT
SOURCE OF DEPTH VALUES (A=Attenuation File, F=Fault Data File): A
DETERMINISTIC SITE PARAMETERS
Page
ABBREVIATED
FAULT NAME
SAN JACINTO-COYOTE CREEK
SAN JACINTO-ANZA
SAN JACINTO-SAN JACINTO VA
SAN JACINTO-SAN BERNARDINO
ELSINORE-COYOTE MOUNTAIN
ELSINORE- JULIAN
ELSINORE-TEMECULA
ELSINORE -GLEN IVY
WHITTIER
CHINO-CENTRAL AVE . (Elsino
EARTHQUAKE VALLEY
CORONADO BANK
NEWPORT- INGLEWOOD (Offshor
ROSE CANYON
NEWPORT- INGLEWOOD (L.A.Bas
PALOS VERDE S
COMPTON THRUST
ELYS I AN PARK THRUST
nT5T>Tjr»Ynet? I\UA •
DISTANCE
mi (km)
52 ( 83)
46 ( 74)
46 { 75)
59 ( 95)
58 ( 93)
23 ( 38)
23 ( 37)
33 ( 53)
51 ( 82)
48 ( 77)
43 ( 69)
22 ( 35)
6 ( 10)
6 ( 9)
46 ( 74)
36 ( 59)
56 ( 90)
58 ( 94)
MAX. (
MAX.
CRED.
MAG.
6.80
7.20
6.90
6.70
6.80
7.10
6.80
6.80
6.80
6.70
6.50
7.40
6.90
6.90
6.90
7.10
6.80
6.70
:REDIBLI
PEAK
SITE
ACC. g
0.049
0.083
0.063
0.037
0.042
0.180
0.148
0.093
0.050
0.050
0.049
0.236
0.574
0.590
0.063
0.106
0.064
0.055
2 EVENT
SITE
INTENS
MM
VI
VII
VI
V
VI
VIII
VIII
VII
VI
VI
VI
IX
X
X
VI
VII
VI
VI
MAX. I
MAX.
PROB.
MAG.
6.20
6.90
6.80
6.70
6.20
6.40
6.30
6.30
5.90
5.50
5.70
6.30
5.80
5.70
5.60
6.20
5.80
5.80
'ROBABLI
PEAK
SITE
ACC. g
0.029
0.064
0.058
0.037
0.024
0.109
0.101
0.060
0.022
0.019
0.024
0.109
0.307
0.294
0.020
0.048
0.029
0.027
S EVENT
SITE
INTENS
MM
V
VI
VI
V
V
VII
VII
VI
IV
IV
IV
VII
IX
IX
IV
VI
V
V
-END OF SEARCH- 18 FAULTS FOUND WITHIN THE SPECIFIED SEARCH RADIUS.
THE ROSE CANYON FAULT IS CLOSEST TO THE SITE.
IT IS ABOUT 5.7 MILES AWAY.
LARGEST MAXIMUM-CREDIBLE SITE ACCELERATION: 0.590 g
LARGEST MAXIMUM-PROBABLE SITE ACCELERATION: 0.307 g
APPENDIX C
GRADING GUIDELINES
Grading should be performed to at least the minimum requirements of the governing
agencies, Chapter 33 of the Uniform Building Code, the geotechnical report and the
guidelines presented below. All of the guidelines may not apply to a specific site and
additional recommendations may be necessary during the grading phase.
Site Clearing
Trees, dense vegetation, and other deleterious materials should be removed from the
site. Non-organic debris or concrete may be placed in deeper fill areas under direction
of the Soils engineer.
Subdrainaae
1. During grading, the Geologist and Soils Engineer should evaluate the necessity
of placing additional drains (see Plate A).
2. All subdrainage systems should be observed by the Geologist and Soils Engineer
during construction and prior to covering with compacted fill.
3. Consideration should be given to having subdrains located by the project
surveyors. Outlets should be located and protected.
Treatment of Existing Ground
1. All heavy vegetation, rubbish and other deleterious materials should be disposed
of off site.
2. All surficial deposits including alluvium and colluvium should be removed unless
otherwise indicated in the text of this report. Groundwater existing in the alluvial
areas may make excavation difficult. Deeper removals than indicated in the text
of the report may be necessary due to saturation during winter months.
3. Subsequent to removals, the natural ground should be processed to a depth of
six inches, moistened to near optimum moisture conditions and compacted to fill
standards.
Fill Placement
1. Most site soil and bedrock may be reused for compacted fill; however, some
special processing or handling may be required (see report). Highly organic or
contaminated soil should not be used for compacted fill.
(1)
2. Material used in the compacting process should be evenly spread, moisture
conditioned, processed, and compacted in thin lifts not to exceed six inches in
thickness to obtain a uniformly dense layer. The fill should be placed and
compacted on a horizontal plane, unless otherwise found acceptable by the Soils
Engineer.
3. If the moisture content or relative density varies from that acceptable to the Soils
engineer, the Contractor should rework the fill until it is in accordance with the
following:
a) Moisture content of the fill should be at or above optimum moisture.
Moisture should be evenly distributed without wet and dry pockets. Pre-
watering of cut or removal areas should be considered in addition to
watering during fill placement, particularly in clay or dry surficial soils.
b) Each six inch layer should be compacted to at least 90 percent of the
maximum density in compliance with the testing method specified by the
controlling governmental agency. In this case, the testing method is ASTM
Test Designation D-1557-91.
4. Side-hill fills should have a minimum equipment-width key at their toe excavated
through all surficial soil and into competent material (see report) and tilted back
into the hill (Plate A). As the fill is elevated, it should be benched through surficial
deposits and into competent bedrock or other material deemed suitable by the
Soils Engineer.
5. Rock fragments less than six inches in diameter may be utilized in the fill,
provided:
a) They are not placed in concentrated pockets;
b) There is a sufficient percentage of fine-grained material to surround the
rocks;
c) The distribution of the rocks is supervised by the Soils Engineer.
6. Rocks greater than six inches in diameter should be taken off site, or placed in
accordance with the recommendations of the Soils Engineer in areas designated
as suitable for rock disposal.
7. In clay soil large chunks or blocks are common; if in excess of six (6) inches
minimum dimension then they are considered as oversized. Sheepsfoot
compactors or other suitable methods should be used to break the up blocks.
(2)
8. The Contractor should be required to obtain a minimum relative compaction of 90
percent out to the finished slope face of fill slopes. This may be achieved by
either overbuilding the slope and cutting back to the compacted core, or by direct
compaction of the slope face with suitable equipment.
If fill slopes are built "at grade" using direct compaction methods then the slope
construction should be performed so that a constant gradient is maintained
throughout construction. Soil should not be "spilled" over the slope face nor
should slopes be "pushed out" to obtain grades. Compaction equipment should
compact each lift along the immediate top of slope. Slopes should be back
rolled approximately every 4 feet vertically as the slope is built. Density tests
should be taken periodically during grading on the flat surface of the fill three to
five feet horizontally from the face of the slope.
In addition, if a method other than over building and cutting back to the
compacted core is to be employed, slope compaction testing during construction
should include testing the outer six inches to three feet in the slope face to
determine if the required compaction is being achieved. Finish grade testing of
the slope should be performed after construction is complete. Each day the
Contractor should receive a copy of the Soils Engineer's "Daily Field Engineering
Report" which would indicate the results of field density tests that day.
9. Fill over cut slopes should be constructed in the following manner:
a) All surficial soils and weathered rock materials should- be removed at the
cut-fill interface.
b) A key at least 1 equipment width wide (see report) and tipped at least 1
foot into slope should be excavated into competent materials and observed
by the Soils Engineer or his representative.
c) The cut portion of the slope should be constructed prior to fill placement
to evaluate if stabilization is necessary, the contractor should be
responsible for any additional earthwork created by placing fill prior to cut
excavation.
10. Transition lots (cut and fill) and lots above stabilization fills should be capped with
a four foot thick compacted fill blanket (or as indicated in the report).
11. Cut pads should be observed by the Geologist to evaluate the need for
overexcavation and replacement with fill. This may be necessary to reduce water
infiltration into highly fractured bedrock or other permeable zones,and/or due to
differing expansive potential of materials beneath a structure. The overexcavation
should be at least three feet. Deeper overexcavation may be recommended in
some cases.
(3)
12. Exploratory backhoe or dozer trenches still remaining after site removal should be
excavated and filled with compacted fill if they can be located.
Grading Observation and Testing
1. Observation of the fill placement should be provided by the Soils Engineer during
the progress of grading.
2. In general, density tests would be made at intervals not exceeding two feet of fill
height or every 1,000 cubic yards of fill placed. This criteria will vary depending
on soil conditions and the size of the fill. In any event, an adequate number of
field density tests should be made to evaluate if the required compaction and
moisture content is generally being obtained.
3. Density tests may be made on the surface material to receive fill, as required by
the Soils Engineer.
4. Cleanouts, processed ground to receive fill, key excavations,subdrains and rock
disposal should be observed by the Soils Engineer prior to placing any fill. It will
be the Contractor's responsibility to notify the Soils Engineer when such areas are
ready for observation.
5. A Geologist should observe subdrain construction.
6. A Geologist should observe benching prior to and during placement of fill.
Utility Trench Backfill
Utility trench backfill should be placed to the following standards:
1. Ninety percent of the laboratory standard if native material is used as backfill.
2. As an alternative, clean sand may be utilized and flooded into place. No specific
relative compaction would be required; however, observation, probing, and if
deemed necessary, testing may be required.
3. Exterior trenches, paralleling a footing and extending below a 1:1 plane projected
from the outside bottom edge of the footing, should be compacted to 90 percent
of the laboratory standard. Sand backfill, unless it is similar to the inplace fill,
should not be allowed in these trench backfill areas.
Density testing along with probing should be accomplished to verify the desired
results.
(4)
[CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE (Part 1 of 2) ENV-1
PROJECT NAME _ _
Pilcifi/vx UCC-
PROJECT ADDRESS
PRINCIPAL DESIGNER-ENVELOPE
DOCUMENTATION AUTHOR ^
&ctvi&k P\.t*\4) /\ I «,«/•
5WA
TELEPHONE
~7(»O 7 2.1 - 3 *lf C»jT
TELEPHONE
DATE
"b/2.£? [OO
Building Permit #
Checked by/Date
Enforcement Agency Use
GENERAL INFORMATION ^ Puuj T^CM^f
DATE OF PLANS BUILDING CONDITIONED FLOOR AREA \ "2. 6>O CT'|JE.4PLIMATE ZONE "7
BUILDING TYPE SI NONRESIDENTIAL
PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION D NEW CONSTRUCTION
METHOD OF ENVELOPE D COMPONENT
COMPLIANCE
D HIGH RISE RESIDENTIAL n HOTEL/MOTEL GUEST ROOM
^ADDITION D ALTERATION D UNCONDITIONED (file affidavit) :
D OVERALL ENVELOPE D PERFORMANCE
STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
This Certificate of compliance lists the building features and performance specifications need to comply with Title 24, Parts 1
and 6 of the California Code of Regulations. This certificate applies only to building envelope requirements.
The documentation preparer hereby certifies that the documentation is accurate and complete.
DOCUMENTATION AUTHOR
>«-AJCy
The Principal Envelope Designer hereby certifies that the proposed building design represented in this set of construction
documents is consistent with the other compliance forms and worksheets, with the specifications, and with any other
calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed building has been designed to meet the envelope
requirements contained in sections 110, 116 through 118, and 140, 142, 143 or 149 of Title 24, Part 6. \.
Please check one:
D I hereby affirm that I am eligible under the provisions of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code to sign this
document as the person responsible for its preparation; and that I am licensed in the State of California as a civil
engineer or mechanical engineer, or I am a licensed architect.
I affirm that I am eligible under the provisions of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code by section 5537.2 or
6737.3 to sign this document as the person responsible for its preparation; and that I am a licensed contractor
performing this work.
CD I affirm that I am eligible under Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code to sign this document because it
pertains to a structure or type of work described as exempt pursuant to Business and Professions Code Sections 5537,
5538 and 6737.1.
(These sections of the Business and Professions Code are printed in full in the Nonresidential Manual.)
PRINCIPAL ENVELOPE DESIGNER-NAME I SIGNATVfcE/7 A [DATE/
ENVELOPE MANDATORY MEASURES
&
Indicate location on plans of Note Block for Mandatory Measures
INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT
For Detailed instructions on the use of this and all Energy Efficiency Standards compliance forms, please refer to the
Nonresidential Manual published by the California Energy Commission.
ENV-1: Required on plans for all submittals. Part 2 may be incorporated in schedules on plans.
ENV-2: Used for all submittals; choose appropriate version depending on method of envelope compliance.
ENV-3: Optional. Use if default U-values are not used. Choose appropriate version for assembly U-value to be calculated.
Nonresidential Compliance Form November 1998
fi
o2o
o"i &15S Sol
°-r ° ° E8o5 £8I8 i
5*0
m CC (- 5
S C3 LU S :£ =! UJ o 'O Q- 5 O .
oof orSzilS^ls
2 -J z £ 1 <a tu u. x x O
• ois
o a. m
o-
*e
^Jo-
f
tf
Xg
s~-\(j-
ftis**J
\
7"
5_iR|
— .,»)„.. ,.,— J — -,
r * 1i
V
1
-"