The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2048 AVENUE OF THE TREES; ; CB152858; PermitCity of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 09-02-2015 Residential Permit Permit No: CB152858 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 Job Address: 2048 AVENUE OF THE TREES CBAD Permit Type: Parcel No: Valuation: RESDNTL Sub Type: RAD 1562900900 Lot #: 0 $0.00 Constuction Type: 58 Status: ISSUED Applied: 09/01/2015 Entered By: SLE Occupancy Group: # Dwelling Units: Bedrooms: 0 0 Reference #: Structure Type: Bathrooms: 0 Orig PC#: Plan Approved: 09/02/2015 Issued: 09/02/2015 Inspect Area: Plan Check #: Project Title: HAVERKAMP: ADD STAIRS FROM STORAGE TO COURTYARD, ADD PARTITION WALLS IN STORAGE AREA Applicant: Owner: HAVERKAMP ROBERT&KATHLEEN LIVING TRUST 10-05-04 HAVERKAMP ROBERT&KATHLEEN LIVING TRUST 10-05-04 2048 AVENUE OF THE TREES CARLSBAD CA 92008 760-672-27 48 Building Permit Add'l Building Permit Fee Plan Check Add'l Plan Check Fee Plan Check Discount Strong Motion Fee Park in Lieu Fee Park Fee LFM Fee Bridge Fee Other Bridge Fee BTD #2 Fee BTD #3 Fee Renewal Fee Add'l Renewal Fee Other Building Fee HMP Fee Pot. Water Con. Fee Meter Size Add'l Pot. Water Con. Fee Reel. Water Con. Fee Green Bldg Stands (SB1473) Fee Green Bldg Stands Plan Chk Fee $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $300.00 $0.00 $1.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1.00 $0.00 2048 AVENUE OF THE TREES CARLSBAD CA 92008 Meter Size Add'l Reel. Water Con. Fee Meter Fee SDCWA Fee CFD Payoff Fee PFF (3105540) PFF (4305540) License Tax (31 04193) License Tax (4304193) Traffic Impact Fee (3105541) Traffic Impact Fee (4305541) Sidewalk Fee PLUMBING TOTAL ELECTRICAL TOTAL MECHANICAL TOTAL Housing Impact Fee Housing lnlieu Fee Housing Credit Fee Master Drainage Fee Sewer Fee Additional Fees Fire Sprinkler Fees TOTAL PERMIT FEES Total Fees: $302.00 Total Payments to Date: $302.00 Balance Due: FINAL APPROVAL Date: IZ·Z.J·f.t, Clearance: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $302.00 $0.00 NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "Imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as "fees/exactions.' You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project. NOR DOES IT APPLY to any f o · · I · 'I to i or s o h' ch I e t I t of · · ti s t · ' APPLICATION FOUND FOR THIS PROJECT 1 Inspection List Permit#: CB152858 Type: RESDNTL RAD Date Inspection Item Inspector 04/25/2016 89 Final Combo PB 11/24/2015 17 Interior Lath/Drywall PB 11/23/2015 17 Interior Lath/Drywall PB 11/20/2015 84 Rough Combo PB 11/17/2015 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall PB 11/17/2015 34 Rough Electric PB 11/12/2015 14 F rame/Steei/Bolting!Weldin PB 11/06/2015 13 Shear Panels/HD's PY 09/24/2015 12 Steel/Bond Beam PB 09/17/2015 12 Steel/Bond Beam py 09/17/2015 12 Steel/Bond Beam py Wednesday, December 28, 2016 Act NR PA CA PA AP PA PA AP AP PA PA HAVERKAMP: ADD STAIRS FROM STORAGE TO COURTYARD, ADD PARTITI Comments Page 1 of 1 PERMIT INSPECTION HISTORY REPORT (CB152858) BLDG-Residential 09/01/2015Application Date:Permit Type:Owner:TRUST HAVERKAMP ROBERT & KATHLEEN LIVING TRUST 10-05-04 Subdivision:Addition 09/02/2015Work Class:Issue Date: 2048 Avenue Of The Trees Carlsbad, CA 92008-1104 Address:02/16/2017Expiration Date:Status: IVR Number: 708924 Closed - Finaled Scheduled Date Inspection Type Inspection No.Inspection Status Primary Inspector Reinspection CompleteActual Start Date 12/23/2016 12/23/2016 BLDG-Final Inspection 006947-2016 Passed Paul Burnette Complete COMMENTS PassedChecklist Item BLDG-Building Deficiency Yes BLDG-Plumbing Final Yes BLDG-Mechanical Final Yes BLDG-Structural Final Yes BLDG-Electrical Final Yes December 23, 2016 Page 1 of 1 NSI 420 Compass Road • Oceart!iide • CA • 92054 Office{760) 217-0494• Fax;:(760 453.2144 NARBETH ·STRUCTURAL INSPECTION 1 .-. ..;o-sN_o __ -~---'--r:i\-.--_,_Q_lr_/._/ __ /--®-t •. I ~ OA1"E //:1-;j / Jr 2 ~--------------~~--~--~~~--------~~~--------~~---L- 1 ~E!NFORCEO .CONCRETE (3 STRUCT. STEELASSEM. BLY 0 sto·Fi'\Y-APPUEO FIREPROOFING . 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 "RE!NFOROED GYPSUM . 0 OTI·ER ______ _ I 0 RE!NFOP.CEO ~ONRY 0 DEEP FOUNDATION _Authoriz~d g;l ACI . j;i61ICBO Speci;;l Inspector ® 0j SOURCE OF MFGR: DESCR!Se MAT'L. (MIX DESIGN. RE-BAR GAAOE & MFGA. WELD--ROD, eT(;.) !f:~~EC@~~~REIVAL. @ ~~~~DOF LOCATION OF WORK INSPECTED, TEST SAMPLES TAKEN, WORK REJECTED, .JOB f'AOSLEMS, PROGRESS, REMARKS. ETC. @ DATE DEPARTURE WORK JNCWDES INFORMAllON ABOUT-AMOUNTS OF MA-r'ERIAL PLACCO OR WORK PREFORMED, NUMBER, TYPE & !DENT. NO'S OF 1---+TI.:..:M:.:.:·::.E --+'::..:N.::.:SP~EC:.::...:.,TED;::::.... __ 1"E_S_T_SAM_P_LES TAKEN, STRUCT, CONNECTIONS (WELDS MADE, H.T. BOLTS TORQUED) CHECJo~·'-:0_. ""-C---~------i ./)..5' I . . --I I j i ! . r THIS REPORT DOES NOT RELI_EVE THE CONTRACTOR OF HIS RESPONSIBILir 'TO BUILD PER THE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND-ALL·APPLJCABLE CODES. TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, WORK INSPECTED WAS IN ACCORDANCE WrTH ii-!E SOIL lNVESTlGATION RECOMMENDATIONS. THE APPROVED PLANS, SPECIACATJONS. AND APPUCASLE SECTIONS OF THE Li.B_C. BUILDING CODE, . I UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTFD. . . r~SPECTOR (miNT oR TYPE) A/J' /L , SlGNATIJRE · ~ ~ ®. ~~~~~~--~------ DATE SIGNE~ t7I7J r CEFrrlACATE N~). 51 L(!} 3 5/ /_ WHITE-NS! CANARY -Con!ractor PINK -Building Official NSI 420 Compass Road • Oceansilde eCA • 92054 Office (760) 277-0404• Fax~(760 453-2144 NARBETH ·STRUCTURAL INSPECTION JOB NO • ~uthorized . . . it§. ACI (2fiCBO Special Inspector JOB ADDRESS t!J. Jl' Ot/v N'l" 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE . 0 PRE-STRESSEO CONCRETE Q RBNFORCEO MASONRY 0 srRuct STEEL ASSEMBLY 0 ~Y-APPUED~EPAOOR 0 "RBNFOROED GYPSUM . .Q OTI-iER ('!?;4~+ ... 0 DEEP FOUNDATION - LAB. RECEIVING a TES11NG CONSTR. M;4T't. SAMPlES ® INSPEC~ ARRIVAL ,;-a. OETAIU!O TION ~ TIME \CI' REPORT OF DATE DEPARnJRE WORK LOCA110N OF WORK INSPECTED, TEST SAMPI.£5 TAKEN, WORK AEJECTED, JOB PAOBLEMS, f'ROGRESS, REMARKS, ETC. @ INCLUDES INFORWmON ASOUT-AMOUN'IS OF WITERIAL. PLACED OR WORK PREFORMED, NUMBeR, 1VPE & lDENT. NO'S OF TIME INSPECTED TEST SAMPLES TAKEN, STRUCT. CONNECTIONS (W8.DS MADE, H..T.. BOLTS TOfiQUED) CHECJ<J~. ETC. .· THIS REPORT DOES NOT REUEVE THE CONTRACTOR OF HIS RESPONSIBILIT'i' TO BUILD .PER THE PLANS, SPECIFICAtiONS AND ~APPLJCABLE CODES. : TO THE BEST OF Mv KNOWl.EDGE,_WORK INSPECTED WAS IN ACCORDANCE INSPECTOR (l'fllfT OR moe) ,./ll-At ;#o{;Y..,rlJI,t,f;;;¥ ~:,1 Willi nfE SOIL INVESTIGATION RECOMMENDATIONS. THE APPROVED PLANS, ,. ·· : .• SPECIFJCATIONS, AND APPUCABI..E SECTIONS OF THE UAC. BUILDING CODE, SI_GNATURE -·-·' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. DATE SIGN WHITE-.NSI CANARY -Contractor • : WEIGHMASTER CERTIFICATE THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the following described commodity was weighed, measured, or counted by a weighmasjer, whose signature is on this certificate, who is a recognized authl5rity of accuracy, as presc•ibed by Chapter 7 (commencing with section 12700) of Divisron 5 of the California Business and Professions Code, administered by the Division of Measurement Standards of the California Department of Food and Agriculture. CY =Cubic Yard PY =Per Cubic Yard Excessive water is detrimental to concrete performance. Gallons to full load /Slump ___ _ Gallons to 3/4 load ____ /Slump ___ _ Gallons to 1/21oad /Slump ___ _ Gallons to 1/4 load /Slump ___ _ Water added on job at customer's request. SUPERIOR READY MIX CONCREtE, L.'P. SERVING SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SINCE 1958 1945061 WITH LOCA T/ONS TO SERVE YOU·~ SHOWN ON REVERSE 111~111111111111111111 020000.114 F4 C.O.D. 0 Cash 1221. ~'i~J 0 Check No. ___ _ 0 Credit "Customer acknowledges that the described material has been selected and ordered by Customer and that Superior has not reviewed any plans or specifications nor given any oral recommendations or assurances regarding the fitness of the material for a specified purpose, unless Superior has provided such review, recommendations or assurances in a writing signed by an authorized representative of Superior. Superior does not warrant that the materials supplied comply with SB 800. Concrete is porous. Some cracking, pop-outs, surface blemishes or color variations may occur for which Superior is not responsible. Water is added only at Customer's request. Added water will increase water/cement ratios, decrease strength and may cause increased cracking and color variations. Superior is not responsible for the addition of water or any other material to the concrete by the customer. Customer agrees to defend, indemnify and hold Superior harmless, to the fullest extent of the law, from any liability or claims for damage relating to the ordered material being not suitable for its intended use or not suited for placement upon the ground soils or conditions where the materials are placed." SEI·. RE\ ERSE SIOE FOR TERJ\IS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE I SAFETY J'RECAlJTIONS Received in good condition by: DELIVERY CONCRETE LOCATIONS N. SAN DIEGO COUNTY CALL: 760-7 45-0556 • ESCONDIDO •OCEANSIDE • FALLBROOK S. SAN DIEGO COUNTY CALL: 858-695-0666 • CARROLL CANYON • MISSION GORGE • OTAY MESA LAKESIDE CALL: 619-443-7510 RAMONA CALL: 760-789-1180 SUPERIOR READY MIX CONCRETE, L.P. CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS 1508 W. MISSION RD. • ESCONDIDO, CA 92029 PHONE: (760) 745-0556 • FAX: (760) 740-9557 WWW.SUPERIORRM.COM J;'OR ALL YOUR CONCRETE AND AGGREGATE NEEDS: CONCRETE LOCATIONS (CONT.) RIVERSIDE COUNTY CALL: 951-658-1562 • CORONA • MURRIETA • HEMET COACHELLA VALLEY CALL: 760-343-3418 •1000 PALMS •INDIO •COACHELLA EL CENTRO CALL: 760-352-4341 AGGREGATE LOCATIONS SAN DIEGO COUNTY CALL: 760-7 45-0556 • SAN MARCOS • MISSION GORGE • EL CAJON • LAKESIDE COACHELLA VALLEY CALL: 760-343-3418 ELCENTRO CALL: 760-352-4341 TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE I SAFETY PRECAUTIONS Your calls may be recorded for quality assurance purposes. l. "CAUTION! Freshly mixed concrete may cause skin injury. Avoid contact with skin and wash exposed skin areas promptly with water. In case of contact with eyes, rinse with water immediately and repeatedly and seek medical attention. Keep children away from concrete and other freshly mixed cement products." 2. Customer is responsible to provide an area or container for the clean out of mixer truck chute. Any discharge to watercourses, street gutters or stormdrains is a violation of law. 3. Customer acknowledges that he has instructed Superior's driver to unload materials in a location specified by Customer, and agrees to defend. indemnify and hold Superior harmless from any liabilty or claims for damage to property as a result of the movements of Superior's truck from the public street to and about the delivery location. 4. No refunds. All sales are final. Customer Signature ------------------- Pour Date of # Permit# Pour* 1 CB131109 10/22/14 2 CB131109 3/21/15 3 CB131109 7/17/15 CB131109 & 4 CB152858 7/23/15 5 CB152858 9/18/15 6 CB152858 9/25/16 Concrete Pour and Inspection Report for 2048 Aveneue of the Trees Submitted by owner, R. Haverkamp Permit #'s CB131109 & CB152858 (Rebar Dowel) Epoxy Rebar Inspection Inspection Inspector Concrete Description of Pour Date* date Name Supplier Walls and Footings. See Plan mark-up for location(s). 10/13/14 10/16/14 Paul B Mar-Con Walls and Footings. See Plan 2/6/15 & mark-up for location(s). 2/28/15 3/2/15 PauiB Robertson's Slab. See Plan mark-up for location(s) N/A 7/15/15 Paul (G?) Superior Walls and Footings. See Plan mark-up for location(s). 7/9/15 7/21/15 Pete Superior Stairwell footing. See plan mark- up for locattion. N/A 9/17/15 Paul (G?} Superior Walls and Footings. See Plan mark-up for locatlon(s). 9/8/15 9/24/15 PauiB Superior ___ *All epoxy and concrete inspections performed by Narbeth Structursllnspection (NSI} ** All lab test performed by Southwest Inspection and Testing, Inc i I Delivery Ticket Lab Report Lab Number Date** Results** 1 106880 12/4/14 Sat 19785435 & ! 19705436 4/28/15 Sat 1873284& 1873289 N/A N/A 1919557 9/21/15 Sat 292178 N/A N/A · .. 13270? 11/24/15 Sat -tJ, '·I t FIELD DATA ON TEST SPECtMENS ---ASTM C31, C138, C143, C172, C173, C231, CONCRETE: X MORTAR: SHOTCRETE: CORES: ADDRESS: 2048 -2050 AVENUE OF THE TREES JOB#: JOB NAME: BAKER I HAVERKAMP RESIDENCE PERMIT#: SEE REMARK ARCHITECT: ENGINEER: CONTRACTOR: SUB: LOCATION IN STRUCTURE: WALLS I FOOTINGS TRACT: CONCRETE SUPPLIER: SUPERIOR ROY MX TYPE Of CEMENT: II/ V PHASE: PLANT: ADMIXTURE: SLUMP: 5.00 in. CONCRETE TEMP: 85 F WATER ADDED: 0 gal. MIXING TIME: 67 min. C1064 --- GUNITE: DATE: 11/24/2015 ISSUED BY: CARLSBAD LOT#: MIX#: 868P TICKET #: 132705 AIR TEMP: 79 F TIME CAST: 12:30 DATE CAST: 09/25/2015 RECEIVED AT LAB: 11/17/2015 SPECIMENS MADE BY: NICK NARBETH SPECIFIED PSI @ 28 Days: 4000 LAB#:61622 CLIENT: NARBETH STRUCTURAL INSP. TESTING INFORMATION: SAMPLE IDEN11FICA110N: 726745 726746 726747 AGE DAYS: 28+ 28+ 28+ DATE TEST: 1111812015 11/18/2015 11118/2015 SIZE (in.): Height X Diameter 8.000 X 4.004 8.000 X 4.009 8.000 X 4.008 AREA (in.A2): 12.59 12.62 12.62 CRUSH LOAD (lbs.): 70471 72690 71441 COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (psi.): 5600 5760 5660 HEIGHT ·DIAMETER RAllO: CORREC110N FACTOR: CORRECTED STRENGTH (psi.): BREAK TYPE: IV Ill II C.T.M. USED: Fomey96 Forney96 Fomey96 REMARKS: PEAMtTS : CBt52858 • C8152200 (OVER 28 DAYS) ASTM C39, C174, C192, C470, C617, C42 COMPLIES: X DOES NOT COMPLY: FOR INFORMATION: THIS REPORT SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED, EXCEPT IN FULL, WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF SOUTHWEST INSPECTION AND TESTING, INC. SAMPLES CAST BY OTHERS: NOTICE: These test results are from samples cast by inspectors or technicians not employed by our firm. They were either delivered to our laboratory or picked up by our dnver, We will accept oo responsibility tor lha tnspecbon made on the jobsite by the inspector. furthermore we do not take responsibility for any information on thts report other than the strength as tested and reported, ASTM C39 BREAKS: !•CONE -II=CONE AND SPLIT - RESPECTFULLY SUBMIITED SOUTHWEST INSPECTION AND TESTING ERROL ASAYAS LAB. MANAG~R " III=COLUMNAR -IV=SHEAR -V=SIDE FRACTURES -VI=POINTED A j ~-'~ CITY OF CB152858 2048 AVENUE OF THE TREES HAVERKAMP: ADD STAIRS FROM CARLSBAD Building Division INSPECTION RECORD STORAGE TO COURTYARD, ADD PARTITION WALLS IN STORAGE AREA RESDNTL RAD Lot#: HAVERKAMP ROBERT&KATHLEEN LIVING TRUST 10-05-04 ~ INSPECnON RECORD CARD WITH APPROVED PLANS MUST BE KEPT ON THE JOB ~ CALL BEFORE 3:30pm FOR NEXT WORK DAY INSPEcnON ~FOR BUILDING INSPECnON CALL: 760-602·2725 OR GO TO: www.Carlsbacka.goy/8uildlng AND CLICK ON Kequ<e.:n; lnspectl!_n" • IF YES" IS CHECKED BELOW THAT DIVISION'S APPROV-\L IS FIF:OU!RED f'£:1l_QB_I_D __ fi_E;_q_I}_F::_'?_:!_II'l..0. A FINAL l3UILDINC INc;PCC:TION. IF YOU H1\VE .ANY QUESTIOf·JS PLE1\SE C\LL THE 1\PPLIC-\BLE DIVISIONS AT THE PHONE NUMBER';', PROVIDED FJL:L• . .lW . .1\FTFR ALL REQUIRED APPROV.\LS 1\RE SIGNED OFF--FI\X TO 760-6028560. EMAIL TO l'_lL_Cl.Q_!ti'?':'_§_(:li_QLJ2'___!::J'-_Bh'?.1311,DC_>\(;:_Qy_ OR BRING IN A COPY OF THIS CARD TO' 163~j FAT<ADAY 1\VE. Cllf~LSBi\D C.l\ 92008. 8U!LDINC INSF'ECTOFIS C/\N EEHE>\CHED AT 760-602-2700 BETWEEN 7:30AM-8:00AM THE DAY OF YOUR INSPECTION. NO YES Required Prior to Requesting Building Final If Checked YES Date Inspector Notes Planning/Landscape 760.944-8463 Allow 48 hours (Engineering Inspections} 76().438-3891 Call before 2 pm Fire Prevention 7 6().602-4660 Allow 48 hours Type of Inspection Type of Inspection CODE" BUILDING CODE" ELECTRICAL #31 0 RECTitiC UNDERGROUND 0 UFER CODE II MECHANICAL CODE" PLUMBING CoDE# STORM WATER #600 PRE.CONSTRUCTION MEmNG REV 1012012 SEE BACK FOR SPECIAL NOTES Section 5416. Health and Safety Code, State of California (a) There shaH be not less than one water closet for each 20 employees or fractional part thereof working at a construction job site. The water closet shaD consist C'A a patented chemical type toilet. (b) For the purpose of this section the term construction site shaH mean the locatiort on which actual construction of a building Ia in progress. (c) A violation of this section shall constitute a misdemeanor. All construction or work for which a permit is required shall be subject to Inspection and all such construction or wOrk shall remain accessible and exposed for inspection purposes until apf)I'OV,ed by the InspectOr. WOff<: shatl not be done beyond the point Indicated in each successive inspection without first obtaining the approval of the inspector. DATE ADDITIONAL NOTES DATE: 8/28/15 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad EsGil Corporation In cpartnersftip witft government for (1Juilifino Safety CANT . A REVIEWER CJ FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: PCR15-065 ( 13-1109) PROJECT ADDRESS: 2048 Ave of the Trees SET: REV 2, Set II PROJECT NAME: New Residential Storage Basement Robert Haverkamp Residence (Revised Plans) D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's codes. ~ The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. D The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. D The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Robert Haverkamp 2048 Ave of the Trees, Carlsbad, CA 92008 ~ EsGil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. D EsGil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: ) Email: Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person ~ REMARKS: All plans shall be signed by the engineer of record. By: Chuck Mendenhall (SA) EsGil Corporation D GA D EJ D PC Enclosures: 08/24 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858) 560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 DATE: 8/5/15 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad EsGil Corporation In (partnership with (jo'Vemmentfor(]Juiftfing Safety CJ APPLICANT ~URIS. CJ PLAN REVIEWER CJ FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: PCR15-065 ( 13-1109) PROJECT ADDRESS: 2048 Ave of the Trees SET: REV 2, Set I PROJECT NAME: New Residential Storage Basement Robert Haverkamp Residence (Revised Plans) D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's codes. D The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. C8J The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. C8J The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Robert Haverkamp 2048 Ave of the Trees, Carlsbad, CA 92008 D EsGil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. [8J EsGil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Robert Haverkamp Telephone#: (760) 729-2748 Date contacted: 6[ {.p (by\"AJ Email: imbobh@roadrunner.com _/ Fax #: (760) 434-5596 ~Mail ~phon~ Fax In Person D REMAR~f'J\~ By: Chuck Mendenhall (SA) EsGil Corporation D GA D EJ D PC Enclosures: 7/30/15 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858) 560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 .Carlsbad PCR15-065 ( 13-1109) 8/5/15 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES PLAN CHECK NO.: PCR15-065 ( 13-1109) JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 2048 Ave of the Trees FLOOR AREA: Interior partitions (new Basement) STORIES: 2 New stairs, and new retaining walls REMARKS: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: 7/28/15 DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED: 8/5/15 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): HEIGHT: no change DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 7/30/15 PLAN REVIEWER: Chuck Mendenhall (SA) This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the California version of the International Residential Code, International Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Present California law mandates that construction comply with the 2010 edition of the California Code of Regulations (Title 24), which adopts the following model codes: 2009 IRC, 2009 IBC, 2009 UPC, 2009 UMC and 2008 NEC. The above regulations apply, regardless of the code editions adopted by ordinance. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 105.4 of the 2009 International Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process. please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e .. plan sheet number. specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. Carlsbad PCR15-065 ( 13-1109) 8/5/15 Please make all corrections, as requested in the correction list. Submit FOUR new complete sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (THREE sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 1. Guards (Section R312): a) Shall be installed along open-sided walking surfaces that are located more than 30" above the floor or grade below. b) Shall have a height of 42" (may be 34" along the sides of stairs). c) Openings between railings shall be less than 4". The triangular openings formed by the riser, tread and bottom element of a guardrail at a stair shall be less than 6". d) Shall be detailed to show capability to resist a concentrated load of 200 pounds in any direction along the top rail. Table R301.5. e) Clearly show it on plans at the stairway well opening floor in the Floor Framing Plan. 2. Provide stairway and landing details. Section R311.7. a) Maximum rise is 7-3/4" and minimum run is 10", measured from the nosing projection. Where there is no nosing, the minimum run is 11 ". i) A nosing (between %" and 1-%") shall be provided on stairways with solid risers. Exception: No nosing is required if the tread depth is at least 11 inches. Section R311.7.5.3. b) Minimum width is 36". Clearly show it at the stairway at the 2'-4 3/16" dimension. c) The greatest riser height within any flight of stairs shall not exceed the smallest by more than 3/8 inch. The greatest tread depth within any flight of stairs shall not exceed the smallest by more than 3/8 inch. d) Clearly show on plans the lower and the upper landings clear dimensions. 3. Handrails (Section R311.7.7): a) Shall be provided on at least one side of each stairway with four or more risers. b) Handrails and extensions shall be 34" to 38" above nosing of treads and be continuous. c) The handgrip portion of all handrails shall be not less than 1-% inches nor more than 2 inches in cross-sectional dimension. See Section R311.7.8.3 for alternatives. d) Handrails projecting from walls shall have at least 1-% inches between the wall and the handrail. e) Ends of handrails shall be returned or shall have rounded terminations or bends. 4. Provide a copy of the project soil report. The report shall include foundation design recommendations based on the engineer's findings and shall comply with Section R401.4. · Carlsbad PCR15-065 ( 13-1109) 8/5/15 5. The soils engineer recommended that he/she review the foundation excavations. Note on the foundation plan that "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building Department foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the building official in writing that: a) The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report, b) The utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and c) The foundation excavations, the soils expansive characteristics and bearing capacity conform to the soils report." 6. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soils report are properly incorporated into the construction documents (when required by the soil report). 7. Provide a complete construction detail (section view) and cross reference from detail to plans of the proposed interior partitions. 8. Additional corrections may follow. END OF PLAN REVIEW To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Chuck Mendenhall (SA) at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. ·Carlsbad PCR15-065 ( 13-1109) 8/5/15 [DO NOT PAY-THIS IS NOT AN INVOICE] VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad 1109) PLAN CHECK NO.: PCR15-065 ( 13- PREPARED BY: Chuck Mendenhall (SA) DATE: 8/5/15 BUILDING ADDRESS: 2048 Ave of the Trees BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R3 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VB BUILDING AREA Valuation Reg. VALUE PORTION (Sq. Ft.) Multiplier Mod. Int. P. & Ret. W City Est N. Stairs Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE Jurisdiction Code cb By 0 rdinance Bldg. Permit Fee by Ordinance .,... Plan Check Fee by Ordinance .,... Type of Review: D Complete Review D Structural Only 0 Repetitive Fee .,... Repeats • Based on hourly rate Comments: D Other 0 Hourly EsGil Fee 31Hrs.@* ~====$=1 o=o_.-o ...... o-1 ($) $3oo.ool Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue.doc + «~~'-~ CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DIVISION BUILDING PLAN CHECK APPROVAL P-29 DATE: 7-29-15 PROJECT NAME: PROJECT ID: Development Services Planning Division 1635 Faraday Avenue (760) 602-4610 www.carlsbadca.eov PLAN CHECK NO: PCR 15-65 SET#: 1 ADDRESS: 2048 Avenue of the Trees APN: C8J This plan check review is complete and has been APPROVED by the Planning Division. By: Chris Sexton A Final Inspection by the Planning Division is required DYes [g] No You may also have corrections from one or more of the divisions listed below. Approval from these divisions may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Resubmitted plans should include corrections from all divisions. D This plan check review is NOT COMPLETE. Items missing or incorrect are listed on the attached checklist. Please resubmit amended plans as required. Plan Check APPROVAL has been sent to: For questions or clarifications on the attached checklist please contact the following reviewer as marked: PLANN,ING : 76();.602-4610 ~ Chris Sexton 76Q-602-4624 Chris.Sexton@carlsbadca.gov D Gina Ruiz 760-602-4675 Gina.Ruiz@carlsbadca.gov D Remarks: ENGINEERING D Chris Glassen 760-602-2784 CJ:!Ii~_tQpher"Gia~~n@carlsbadca.gov VaiRay Marshall 760-602-2741 VaiRay.Marshall@carlsbadca.gov D Linda Ontiveros 760-602-2773 Linda,Ontiveros@carlsbadca.gov D Greg Ryan 760-602-4663 Gregory.Ryan@carlsbadca.gov D Cindy Wong 760-602-4662 Cynthia.Wong@carlsbadca.gov D Dominic Fieri 760-602-4664 Dominic.Fieri@carlsbadca.gov Mr. Bob Haverkemp 2048 Avenue of the Trees Carlsbad, California 92008 Geotechnical • Geologic • Coastal • Environmental 0 • (760) 438-3155 • FAX (760) 931-0915 • www.geosoilsinc.com August 22, 2014 REGSI~-sc AUG 2 0 2015 CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DIVISION Subject: Revised Report of Allowable Bearing Value, Active, Passive Pressures, Lateral Pressures, and Seismic Design Parameters, Additional Construction at 2048 Avenue of the Trees, Carlsbad, San Diego County, California Dear Mr. Haverkamp: In accordance with your request, GeoSoils, Inc. (GSI) has performed additional laboratory testing and analysis of a representative sample of site soil provided by yourself. The purpose of our testing was to evaluate soil parameters for proposed additional construction to the existing residential structure. The scope of our services provided in preparation of this revised report includes laboratory testing, engineering analyses, and preparation of this revised report. This summary report has been prepared for the sole purpose of simply providing a limited description of soil conditions onsite, and engineering parameters derived from testing of a site soil sample in our laboratory, and does not constitute a geotechnical evaluation of the overall stability, or suitability of the site, as this study was performed without the benefit of a typical subsurface investigation or an evaluation of geologic hazards. LABORATORY TESTING Laboratory tests were performed on representative samples of site earth materials in order to evaluate their physical characteristics. The results of our evaluation are summarized as follows: • The field moisture content and dry unit weight was evaluated for a selected sample in general accordance with ASTM D 2937 and ASTM D 2216. Results indicated a dry unit weight of 117.2 pounds per cubic foot (pet), and a field moisture content of 4.5 percent, a percentage of the wet weight, for a wet unit weight of 122.4 pcf. • An evaluation of soil expansion potential, in general accordance with ASTM D 4829, indicates a very low expansion potential (Expansion Index [EI] =3), where tested. • The grain size distribution of the sample was evaluated in general accordance with ASTM D 422. Based on this test, the soil is generally classified as a silty sand ([SM] 72 percent sand and 28 percent fines). -' • A direct shear test was performed on a representative, relatively undisturbed sample of site soil in general accordance with ASTM D 3080 in a Direct Shear Machine of the strain control type. The shear test results are presented in the following table. BEARING VALUE Based on our analysis, an allowable bearing value of 2,500 pounds per square foot (psf) may be assumed for continuous footings, a minimum 12 inches wide and 12 inches deep (below lowest adjacent grade [excluding soft soils, landscape zones, slab and underlayment thickness, etc.]), bearing on suitable, approved soil. It is anticipated that actual footing depths may be deeper than those indicated above, in order to penetrate any loose, near surface soils. Actual footing depths would be based on conditions exposed within the footing excavation. The allowable bearing value may be increased by 20 percent for each additional12 inches in depth of embedment, or 6 inches in width, into approved suitable bearing soil, to a maximum value of 3,000 psf. The above values may be increased by one-third when considering short duration seismic or wind loads. Differential settlement may be minimally assumed as 1 inch in a 40-foot span, provided the footing bears on suitable, competent and similar earth materials. Foundations should be designed for all applicable surcharge loads and should consider the inherent corrosive coastal environment. LATERAL PRESSURE The passive earth pressure may be computed as an equivalent fluid having a density of 300 pounds per cubic foot (pet} per foot of depth into suitable, approved soil to a maximum earth pressure of 3,000 psf. An allowable coefficient of friction between soil and concrete of 0.40 may be used with the dead load forces. When combining passive pressure and frictional resistance, the passive pressure component should be reduced by one-third. Based on our laboratory testing and analysis, active earth pressure may be computed as an equivalent fluid having a density of 35 pcf per foot of depth (level backfill), or 50 psf/f (2: 1 [h:v] sloping backfill). At-rest earth pressure may be computed as an equivalent fluid Mr. Bob Haverkamp 2048 Avenue of the Trees, Carlsbad Flle:e:\wp9\6600\66B4a.rro GeoSoils, lac. W.O. 6684-A-SC August 22, 2014 Page2 having a density of 54 pet per foot of depth (level backfill). SEISMIC DESIGN General It is important to keep in perspective that in the event of an upper bound (maximum probable) or credible earthquake occurring on any of the nearby major faults, strong ground shaking would occur in the subject site's general area. Potential damage to any structure(s) would likely be greatest from the vibrations and impelling force caused by the inertia of a structure's mass than from those induced by the hazards listed above. This potential would be no greater than that for other existing structures and improvements in the immediate vicinity. Seismic Shaking Parameters Based on the site conditions, the following table summarizes the site-specific design criteria obtained from the 2013 CBC, Chapter 16 Structural Design, Section 1613, Earthquake Loads. The computer program Seismic Design Maps, provided by the United States Geologic Survey (USGS, 2014) was utilized to aid in design. Spectral Response-(0.2 sec), S, Spectral Response-(1 sec), S1 Site Coefficient, Site Coefficient, Maximum Considered Earthquake Spectral Response Acceleration (0.2 sec)., Maximum Considered Earthquake Spectral Response Acceleration (1 sec), SM, Damped Design Spectral Response UAc:celera1tion (0.2 sec), S08 Mr. Bob Haverkemp c 1.12g 1.43g 1.0 1.369 2.12g 1.59g 1.747g 1.393g D 2048 Avenue of the Trees, Carlsbad Ale:e:\wp9\6600\6684a.rro GeoSolls, IDe. Section 1613.3.2/ASCE 7 (Chapter 20} Figure 1613.3.1 (1) Figure 1613.3.1 (2) Table 1613.3.3(1) Table161 Section 1613.3.3 (Eqn 16-37) Section 1613.3.3 (Eqn 16-38} Section 1613.3.4 (Eqn 16-39) Section 1613.3.4 (Eqn 16-40) Section 1613.3.5/ASCE 7 (Table 11.6-1 or 11.6-2) W.O. 6684-A-SC August 22, 2014 Page3 ASCE 7 (Eqn 11.8.1) Distance to Seismic Source(1l -A fault<2> (Newport-Inglewood [offshore]) 6.0 mi/9.6 km Upper Bound Earthquake (Newport-Inglewood [offshore]) <1>-From Blake (2000) <2>-Cao, et al. (2003) Mw = 7.2(2) Conformance to the criteria above for seismic design does not constitute any kind of guarantee or assurance that significant structural damage, ground failure, or surface manifestations will not occur in the event of a large earthquake in this region. The primary goal of seismic design is to protect life, not to eliminate all damage, since such design may be economically prohibitive. Cumulative effects of seismic events are not addressed in the 2013 CBC (CBSC, 2013) and regular maintenance and repair following locally significant seismic events (i.e., Mw 5.0} will likely be necessary. DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA Grading All grading should minimally conform to the guidelines presented in the 2013 CBC {CBSC, 2013}, and the City. When code references are not equivalent, the more stringent code should be followed. During earthwork construction, all site preparation and the general grading procedures of the contractor (if grading is to occur) should be obseNed and the fill selectively tested by a representative(s) of GSI. If unusual or unexpected conditions are exposed in the field, they should be reviewed by this office and if warranted, modified and/or additional recommendations will be offered. All applicable requirements of local and national construction and general industry safety orders, the Occupational Safety and Health Act, and the Construction Safety Act should be met. GSI does not consult in the area of safety engineering. The contractor is responsible for the safety of construction workers onsite. Mr. Bob Haverkamp 2048 Avenue of the Trees, Carlsbad File:e:\wp9\6600\66B4a.rro GeoSoils, Inc. W.O. 6684-A-SC August 22, 2014 Page4 Landscape Maintenance Only the amount of irrigation necessary to sustain plant life should be provided. Over-watering the landscape areas will adversely affect existing and proposed site improvements. We would recommend that any proposed open-bottom planters adjacent to proposed structures be eliminated for a minimum distance of 1 o feet. As an alternative, closed-bottom type planters could be utilized. An outlet placed in the bottom of the planter, could be Installed to direct drainage away from structures or any exterior concrete ·flatwork. If planters are constructed adjacent to structures, the sides and bottom of the planter should be provided with a moisture retarder to prevent penetration of irrigation water into the subgrade. Provisions should be made to drain the excess irrigation water from the planters without saturating the subgrade below or adjacent to the planters. Consideration should be given to the type of vegetation chosen and their potential effect upon surface improvements (i.e., some trees will have an effect on concrete flatwork with their extensive root systems). From a geotechnical standpoint leaching is not recommended for establishing landscaping. If the surface soils are processed for the purpose of adding amendments, they should be recompacted to 90 percent minimum relative compaction. Subsurface and Surface Water Subsurface and surface water are generally not significantly anticipated to affect site development, provided that the recommendations contained in this report are properly incorporated into final design and construction and that prudent surface and subsurface drainage practices are incorporated into the construction plans. Perched groundwater conditions along zones of contrasting permeabilities may not be precluded from occurring in the Mure due to site irrigation, poor drainage conditions, or damaged utilities, and should be anticipated. Should perched groundwater conditions develop, this office could assess the affected area(s) and provide the appropriate recommendations to mitigate the observed groundwater conditions. Groundwater conditions may change with the introduction of irrigation, rainfall, or other factors. OTHER DESIGN PROFESSIONALS/CONSULTANTS Other design professionals (i.e., civil, structural, architect, etc.), should review the recommendations provided herein, incorporate those recommendations into all their respective plans, and by explicit reference, make this report part of their project plans. The structural engineer/designer should consider all applicable codes and authoritative sources where needed. Mr. Bob Haverkemp 2048 Avenue of the Trees, Carlsbad Flle:e:\wp9\6600\6684a.rro GeoSolls,lae. W.O. 6684-A-SC August 22, 2014 PageS LIMITATIONS The materials encountered on the project site and utilized for our analysis are believed representative of the area; however, soil and bedrock materials vary in character between excavations and natural outcrops or conditions exposed during mass grading. Site conditions may vary due to seasonal changes or other factors. Inasmuch as our study is based upon our review, engineering analyses, and laboratory data, the conclusions and recommendations presented herein are professional opinions. These opinions have been derived in accordance with current standards of practice, and no warranty is express or implied. Standards of practice are subject to change with time. This report has been prepared for the purpose of providing soil design parameters derived from testing of a soil sample received at our laboratory, and does not represent an evaluation of the overall stability, suitability, or performance of the property for the proposed development. GSI assumes no responsibility or liability for work or testing performed by others, or their inaction; or work performed when GSI is not requested to be onsite, to evaluate if our recommendations have been properly implemented. Use of this report constitutes an agreement and consent by the user to all the limitations outlined above, notwithstanding any other agreements that may be in place. In addition, this report may be. subject to review by the controlling authorities. Thus, this report brings to completion our scope of services for this portion of the project. The opportunity to be of service is greatly appreciated. If you have any questions concerning this report, or if we may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact any of.the undersigned. RGC/DWS/JPF/jh Attachment Appendix -References Distribution: (2) Addressee Mr. Bob Haverkemp 2048 Avenue of the Trees, Carlsbad File:e:\wp9\6600\6684a.rro CeoSolls, Inc. W.O. 6684-A-8C August22,2014 PageS APPENDIX REFERENCES ACI Committee 318, 2008, Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI318-Q8) and commentary, dated January. American Society of Civil Engineers, 201 0, Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures, ASCE Standard ASCE/SEI 7-1 0. Blake, Thomas F., 2000, EQFAULT, A computer program for the estimation of peak horizontal acceleration from 3-D fault sources; Windows 95/98 version. Building News, 1995, CAL-OSHA, State of California, Construction Safety Orders, Title 8, Chapter 4, Subchapter 4, amended October 1. California Building Standards Commission, 2013, California Building Code, California Code of Regulations, Trtle 24, Part 2, Volume 2 of 2, Based on the 2012 International Building Code, 2013 California Historical Building Code, Title 24, Part 8; 2013 California Existing Building Code, Title 24, Part 10. Cao, T., Bryant, W.A., Rowshandel, B., Branum, D., and willis, C.J., 2003, The revised 2002 California probalistic seismic hazard maps, dated June, http://www.conversation.ca.gov/cgs/rghm/psha/fault_parameters/pdf/documents /2002 ca hazardmaps.pdf GeoSoils, Inc., 2014, Allowable bearing value, active, passive pressures, lateral pressures, and seismic design parameters, additional construction at 2048 Avenue of the Trees, Carlsbad, San Diego County, California, W.O. 6684-A-SC, dated August 22. Sowers and Sowers, 1979., Unified soil classification system (After U. S. Waterways Experiment Station and ASTM 02487 -667) in Introductory soil mechanics, New York. United States Geological Survey, 2014, U.S. Seismic design maps, earthquake hazards program, http://geohazards.usgs.gov/designmaps/us/application.php. Version 3.1.0, dated July. GeoSoll8, lac. \/J 2 t !!? \ ~ ~ t r IJ? .. *" ) ·~ l;) G 0 ~ VI -(}) c.. a,) >--~ c9 co