Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2070 CALETA CT; ; CB063094; Permit
12-08-2006 Job Address Permit Type Parcel No Valuation Occupancy Group # Dwelling Units Bedrooms Project Title City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad CA 92008 Residential Permit Permit No CB063094 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 2070 CALETA CT CBAD RESDNTL 2151101900 $232 41 0 00 Sub Type Lot# Construction Type Reference # 0 Structure Type 0 Bathrooms BURROWS 1497 SF ADD MB/ REMODEL KITCHEN PANTRY BATH #4 RAD 0 VN Status Applied Entered By Plan Approved Issued Inspect Area Orig PC# Plan Check* ISSUED 10/26/2006 JMA 12/08/2006 12/08/2006 Applicant SCOTT SPENCER 7527 GIRARD AVE LAJOLLA CA 92037 858 459 8898 Owner BURROWS RICHARD&LAUREL 2070 CALETA CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 Building Permit Add I Building Permit Fee Plan Check Add I Plan Check Fee Plan Check Discount Strong Motion Fee Park in Lieu Fee Park Fee LFM Fee Bridge Fee Other Bridge Fee BTD #2 Fee BTD #3 Fee Renewal Fee Add I Renewal Fee Other Building Fee HMP Fee Pot Water Con Fee Meter Size Add I Pot Water Con Fee Reel Water Con Fee $956 20 Meter Size $0 00 Add I Reel Water Con Fee $621 53 Meter Fee $0 00 SDCWA Fee $0 00 CFD Payoff Fee $2324 PFF (3105540) $0 00 PFF (4305540) $000 License Tax (3104193) $0 00 License Tax (4304193) $000 Traffic Impact Fee (3105541) $0 00 Traffic Impact Fee (4305541) Q $0 00 Sidewalk Fee $0 00 PLUMBING TOTAL $0 00 ELECTRICAL TOTAL $0 00 MECHANICAL TOTAL $0 00 Housing Impact Fee $0 00 Housing InLieu Fee $0 00 Housing Credit Fee Master Drainage Fee $0 00 Sewer Fee $0 00 Additional Fees TOTAL PERMIT FEES $000 $000 $000 $000 $000 $000 $000 $000 $000 $000 $000 $11800 $2000 $9500 $000 $000 $000 $000 $000 $000 $1 833 97 Total Fees $1 833 97 Total Payments To Date $1 833 97 Balance Due $000 Inspector Clearance NOTICE Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the Imposition of fees dedications reservations or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as fees/exactions You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions If you protest them you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a) and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3 32 030 Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack review set aside void or annul their imposition You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity changes nor planning zoning grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which YOU have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Ave Carlsbad CA 92008 J1RQJ6CT INFORMATION FOR OFFICE USE ONLY PLAN CHECK NO EST VAL Plan Ck Deposit Validated By Date S3 Address (include Bldg/Suite #)Business Name (at this address) Legal Description Lot No Subdivision Name/Number Unit No Phase No Total # of units Assessor s Parcel # Lm- ft t~y/ VKur La £4^m y jeiius^ . 1 iMflrf ^-^ il # ^, . ^, . _ Existing Use ^ , "Proposed Use . <-- - )j<7-l*V Description of Work different from applicant) # of Bedrooms # of Bathrooms ' Name APPUCANT Address""" ' City D AgentJoTCorttractor Q Owner Urgent for Owner State/Zip Telephone # -*( Fax # 6 COI (Sec 7031 5 Business and Professions Code Any City or County which requires a permit to construct alter improve demolish or repair any ?truc*ture pTior to its issuance also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor s License Law [Chapter 9 commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code] or that he is exempt therefrom and the basis for the alleged exemption_ Any violation^of Section 7031 5 byjqy applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penaltyjrf not more than five hundred dollars )4 500]) Pol ^ ttA,M\ Name State License # Address License Class -J&ZI' _L City State/Zip Business License # Telephone State/Zip TelephoneDesigner Name ' Address City State License # ^J V^ % WORKERS COMPENSATION ~~ ^ *3STT £ Workers Compensation Declaration I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations f~1 I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self insure for workers compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued I have and will maintain workers compensation as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code for the performance of the work for which this permit is Pitied My worker s compensation insurance carrier and policy number are / H 4-4 U 6(4 ^il Exp.ration Date lQ / /Insurance Company P°I|CY No (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS [$100] OR LESS) D CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers Compensation Laws of California WARNING Failure to secure workers compensation coverage is unlawful and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dolrars ($100 000) « addition to the cost of compensation damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code interest and attorney s fees v^/SIGNATURE V^.__. [4^^jt^—t^. . DATE /tJ-/fr/ 0£ '7 OWNER-MjILDER DECLARATION JP K ^ ~Z' ' -- _ *% ' Jjfr£ - I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor s License Law for the following reason l~) I as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec 7044 Business and Professions Code The Contractor s License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon and who does such work himself or through his own employees provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale If however the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion the owner builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale) f~| I as owner of the property am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec 7044 Business and Professions Code The Contractor s License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor s License Law) l~l I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason 1 I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement fj] YES QNO 2 I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work 3 I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number) 4 I plan to provide portions of the work but I have hired the following person to coordinate supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number) ___^^_ 5 I will provide some of the work but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type of work) PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE DATE COMPLETE THIS SECTION FOR/VO/V-fffS/D£W7Mi BUILDING PERMITS ONLY Jj§ „ rf K*sfcs Jf ," "I J" ^ -T— **> * Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505 25533 or 25534 of the Presley Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? Q YES Q NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? fj] YES D NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1 000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? Q YES Q NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT 8 tJMSTRWCTloI LENDING AGENCY „ „ JP „ t iF= t * ^ * I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec 3097(0 Civil Code) LENDER S NAME _ LENDER S ADDRESS r APPUCANf ceRflFiclA I certify that I have read the applij City ordinances and State laws property for inspection purpose JUDGMENTS COSTS AND EXPEftSEfc WHICH MAY IN i OSHA An OSHA permit is requiren fbr excawatio*fis over 51 EXPIRATION Every permit issued w th$|bL||dir)tj Qfhcial ufe authorized by such permit is not coi at any time after the work is comi APPLICANT S SIGNATURE n and state that the a at(pg to building constrJctbn ALSO AGREE TO ISA IE •e information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate I agree to comply with all I hereby authorize representatives of the City of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES 'AY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT jeep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height ir the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned 106 4 4 Uniform Building Code) DATE Or ir YELLOW Applicant PINK Finance Inspection List Permit* CB063094 Type RESDNTL RAD Date Inspection Item Inspector Act 11/30/2007 89 11/30/200789 11/30/200789 08/14/2007 29 07/11/200723 06/28/2007 17 06/28/2007 27 06/18/2007 17 06/18/2007 19 05/30/2007 23 05/30/2007 84 04/16/2007 13 04/16/2007 15 04/16/2007 17 04/16/2007 34 03/16/2007 11 03/16/200741 02/08/2007 22 01/04/2007 11 Final Combo Final Combo Final Combo Final Plumbing Gas/Test/Repairs Interior Lath/Drywall Shower Pan/Roman Tubs Interior Lath/Drywall Final Structural Gas/Test/Repairs Rough Combo Shear Panels/HDs Roof/Reroof Interior Lath/Drywall Rough Electric Ftg/Foundation/Piers Underground Ducts Sewer/Water Service Ftg/Foundation/Piers PC PC PC PC PC PC PC PC PC PC PC PC PC PC MC MC MC MC Rl Fl AP PA AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP PA PA AP AP AP PA BURROWS 1497 SF ADD MB/ REMODEL KITCHEN PANTRY BATH #4 Comments GMR OK TO DRY IN OK TO DRY IN INT SHEAR SEE CARD @ INT SHEAR HVAC SUPPLY DUCTS ONLY POC TO 4IN MAIN LINE FOOTING AT KITCHEN & PANTRY PER 12/27/200621 Underground/Under Floor PC AP S40/7 bath rooms Friday November 30 2007 Page 1 of 1 City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For 08/14/2007 Permit* CB063094 Title BURROWS 1497 SF ADD MB/ Description REMODEL KITCHEN PANTRY BATH #4 Inspector Assignment PC Sub Type RAD 2070 CALETA CT Lot Type RESDNTL Job Address Suite Location OWNER BURROWS RICHARD&LAUREL Owner BURROWS FAMILY TRUST 10 16 06 Remarks Phone 7605805952 Inspector Total Time Requested By DAVE HARMES Entered By CHRISTINE CD Description 29 Final Plumbing Act Comments Comments/Notices/Holds PCR07051 Date 07/11/2007 06/28/2007 06/28/2007 06/18/2007 06/18/2007 05/30/2007 05/30/2007 04/16/2007 04/16/2007 04/16/2007 04/16/2007 03/16/2007 03/16/2007 02/08/2007 01/04/2007 12/27/2006 Associated PCRs/CVs ISSUED BURROWS REVISE Inspection History Description 23 Gas/Test/Repairs 17 Interior Lath/Drywall 27 Shower Pan/Roman Tubs 17 Interior Lath/Drywall 19 Final Structural 23 Gas/Test/Repairs 84 Rough Combo 13 Shear Panels/HDs 15 Roof/Reroof 17 Interior Lath/Drywall 34 Rough Electric 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 41 Underground Ducts 22 Sewer/Water Service 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 21 Underground/Under Floor Original PC# COURTYARD & WINDOWS C D E & F 0 Act AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP PA PA AP AP AP PA AP Insp PC PC PC PC PC PC PC PC PC PC PC MC MC MC MC PC Comments OK TO DRY IN INT SHEAR SEE CARD @ INT SHEAR HVAC SUPPLY DUCTS ONLY POCT04IN MAIN LINE FOOTING AT KITCHEN & PANTRY PER S4 0/7 bath rooms UNSCHEDULED BUILDING INSPECTION DATE \L MitiZ- c>7 INSPECTOR PERMIT # ^£ 0 k£o34- PLAN CHECK # JOB ADDRESS DESCRIPTION CODE DESCRIPTION ACT COMMENTS 1A Carl Schmidt Inspection Services, Inc P O Box 178403 SitoDiego,CA 92177-8403 (619) 855-9252 **" SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT Project L> fj ^ra^ % P < ^* Address 2 O?O City £ &<- /<• J> Permit Number Plan File Number TYPE OF OBSERVATIONS Reinforcing Steel Reinforced Concrete Structural Masonry Field Welding Epoxy x' Prestressed Concrete Shop Welding Bolting Fireproofing _ Number of Samples _ Type Matenals/DesignMix/Psi Date REPORT ^Tn— - Lr c. Z?<?^sf t / Si r, \ WORK INSPECTED CONFORMS WITH APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED TIME IN // 0Q TIME OUT /Z.' Inspector (Pnnt) Certification # General Contractor s Address Inspector s Signature Phone Authorized Job Site Contact Signature GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION, INC SOIL & FOUNDATION ENGINEERING GROUNDWATER ENGINEERING GEOLOGY FIELD REPORT ON OBSERVATION OF FOUNDATIONS DATE TIME CLIENT rA PROJECT NAME JOB NO fifi PROJECT ADDRESS Ca/eAi 6< CdrlsLJ f The footing excavations listed below were bottomed on material for which the bearing values recommended in the foundation report are applicable The cast in place drilled friction piles listed below penetrated material for which the allowable supporting capacities recommended in the foundation report are applicable The piles were excavated to diameters at least as large as specified and the excavations extended at least to the depths indicated on the Foundation Plans The excavations for the cast m place belled piers hsted below were bottomed on material for which the bearing values recommended in the foundation report are applicable The excavations were at least as large as specified on the Foundation Plans The driven piles listed below were observed to be driven to the specified lengths and/or driving resistances to obtain the supporting capacities recommended in the foundation report Based upon observations it is our opinion that the foundation reconimendations-> presented report of the foundation investigation Job No0/$ - $/<*?• d ated 3 /^T/0 H to the-conditions observed Foundation Plans hy fJ were used as a reference for our observations NOTE 1 The observations reported above do not constitute an approval of foundation location footing size or depth reinforcement or foundation design Loose soft or disturbed soils must be removed prior to placement of reinforcement or concrete The opinions and recommendations presented in this report were based upon our observa tmns and are presented in accordance with generally accepted professional engineering practice We make no other warranty either express ommphed BY 7420 Trade St San Diego Ca 92121 • (858) 549 7222 • FAX (858) 549 1604 M99CS001128M 1/00 UNSCHEDULED BUILDING INSPECTION DATE 4 INSPECTOR PERMIT #65 094 PLAN CHECK # JOB ADDRESS tcno DESCRIPTION CODE DESCRIPTION ACT COMMENTS ii AT V,i f &"<*** Carl Schmidt Inspection Services, Inc. P O Box 178403 San Diego, CA 92177-8403 (619) 855-9252 SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT o O Project Address City ,f Co. Permit Number Plan File Number TYPE OF OBSERVATIONS Reinforcing Steel X Reinforced Concrete _ Structural Masonry Field Welding Epoxy K Prestressed Concrete _ Shop Welding _ Bolting _ Fireproofmg Number of Samples Type Matenals/DesignMix/Psi n~G> IS Date 'TJ REPORT <fenr v / K afaL.? A) A)E /Jl 5l/3 o/ OuJ)r&K.<r o / qv> WORK INSPECTED CONFORMS WITH APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED TIME IN /Od6 TIMEOUT Inspector (Print)Certification # tngjpector stSlgnature General Contractor Address City ecj6. Authorized Job Site Contact Signature phone /""?/ S> Development Services Department Inspection Services Division 9601 Ridgehaven Court Suite 220 San Diego CA 92123 (858) 492 5070 Circuit Card (Primary) Page 1 of "2- THE C TV o, SAN D EOO ^3" I030' 3O ' '1 H TOF mSpedlOn < * THIS CARD MUST BE FILLED OUT AND AVAILABLE ON THE JOB SITE FOR THE ROUGH INSPECTION USE SUPPLEMENTAL CIRCUIT CARD(S) FOR MORE THAN EIGHT (8) GENERAL USE CIRCUITS TOTAL SEE REVERSE SIDE PERMIT/APPROVAL NO C6063D*?** PLAN FILE/PROJECT NO JOB ADDRESS (Print Number Street Name Unit No ) 2.O"7o CaL.\ZnP\ Go^oT" iX^tXlrt'1* fjfri ; : •• **¥ CIRCUIT NO 1 Breaker Sze 15 A ROOMS B d oom#1 Hall Bedroom #2 Bedroom #3 Garage 1 Name of each 2 List old and new 3 Use circuit spac 4 San Diego Elect of 15 per genera 5 All circuit breake dead fronts R = Conve (Use actual num Wire Sze 14 G T C 1 2 1 1 w Room wher devices on 35 below for rical Policy I use circuit rs to be per Tail C nience Rec bers 1 2 3 R 2 1 4 @ 1 5 de sarr ger imii and mar - (• ept< to S 2 1 1 © 1 vice le c era S CL 4p ent eih icle ide CIRCUIT NO ( Breaker Size )£> A ROOMS CAJT&y t+fltU— Wire Size /*j G T C V7 w -r- R Szf CIRCUIT NO "& Breaker Size A ROOMS •f-fpft i \y Wire Size G T c 1 w \° R ) s Ift CIRCUIT NO 51 Breaker Size A ROOMS fvi «2£i> CLOSET Wire Size G T c V w R ft s CIRCUIT NO T Breaker Size A ROOMS (Y\ |5EP oe/T^iPC/ Wire Size G T c 'A. w 7 R | s I 7 CIRCUIT NO 2 Breakers e 20 A ROOMS < tchen Ktohen D n ng Room Breakfast Nook s are located rcuit marking old de light and small app rrent consuming de\ er small appliance (; y labeled at all servi rig Light W ~ Wall S = Switc ntify amounts of ea WreS e 12 G T C w R (D 1 1 1 S vices thus © liance circuits only /ices to a maximum 10 amp ) circuit De and feeder pane Bracket Light :h ch device type) CIRCUIT NO "2, Breaker Size /^ A ROOMS R)iAlDC^~ Sfc(2A^£ IJAH J DL/r*/^£^- Wire Size M G T 1 C (I i CIRCUIT NO ^ Breaker Size A ROOMS -f A/vu\tf &Nf^/ w I 'R f S 3 1 / ' Wire Size G T c Cj 2 w R s •p 1 CIRCUIT NO £} Breaker Size A ROOMS A1 SiED Wire Size G T Ir w R s %r CIRCUIT NO A Breaker Size A ROOMS rrt ^AT4- Wire Size G T c O w 1i R S L aU&lPftA)0-. Filli Use remark SERVICE (Mam) FEEDER #1 FEEDER #2 (Subpanel) (Subpanel) COMPACTOR COOKTOP DISHWASHER DISPOSAL MICROWAVE OVEN RANGE DRYER LAUNDRY WATER HEATER A/C HEATING n applicable items below s as necessary to describe work NAME PLATE AMPS KW 2DO too WIRE SIZE AL t CU /r5 BREAKER SIZE (AMPS) zoo REMARKS Computed Load AMPS AFCI Protected Circuits (list locations) g£{) &££>f/* GFCI Protected Circuits (list locations) gfyrft. j£( ^flfc£j() Ol/7s iDP' Service Bond/Ground information (a) D New(^ b) Bond/Grou c) Location of d) Location of Icerl andt Company Narr ') OR K3 Exis / rid Wire(s) Siz Cold Water Bo Ground Clamp ify that the ab rtat all termina e (Print) < Electrician/Owner Name(Pnni ting (/) efs) f Type nd Clamp 6 (/) D AL OR D CU ove information is accurate and complete tions are properly torqued ^mic ) ~]jiv*<;jlfti*J Electrician/Owner Signature ,<$<I^' California Electrician Certification Number Date $/ 2.1/67 // DS 1779 (Re 203) THE C TY OF SAN D EGO Development Services Department Inspection Services Division 9601 Ridgehaven Court Suite 220 San Diego CA 92123 (858) 492 5070 Call (858) 581 7111 for Inspection Page Circuit Card (Supplemental) of THIS CARD MUST BE FILLED OUT AND AVAILABLE ON THE JOB SITE FOR THE ROUGH INSPECTION THE USE OF THIS SUPPLEMENTAL CIRCUIT. CARD REQUIRES THE USE OF THE PRIMARY CIRCUIT CARD AS PAGE 1 PERMIT/APPROVAL NO PLAN FILE/PROJECT NO JOB ADDRESS (Print Number Street Name Unit No ) *%J3~/Q OG^ET^ Cjo^^^ CIRCUIT NO Q Breaker Size j ^ A ROOMS PAU Wire Size / T C w y G R | S CIRCUIT NO // Breaker Size A ROOMS set? I P»£DZ Wire Size T f C 7 w G R S 2 CIRCUIT NO f-y Breaker Size f*f A ROOMS HALL Wire Size /5" G T c V w R s 3 CIRCUIT NO /S Breaker Size 2^OA ROOMS R#r/t 2 Wire Size /JjJ G T C w R 2, s CIRCUIT NO /7 Breaker Size ^7^> A ROOMS L-rW/VQA/ ' Wire Size / T C w 2 G R 7. s CIRCUIT NO fQ Breaker Size •*l£>k ROOMS JAtyf^Z) Wire Size T C w •2. G R s CIRCUIT NO If) Breaker Size A ROOMS L.ALfAj£>/3/ STt2j<to£. fy^rrt 2. ftfrttf 3 Wire Size T 1 C 1 *>y w Z R G S 2 3 CIRCUIT NO /^ Breaker Size A ROOMS ft£.t)2L R£A> 3 Wire Size T 1 | Cv i w R y G S 2 2. CIRCUIT NO /4^ Breaker Size 2.0^ ROOMS m ftATf* Wire Size /2 T V C w R %t G S CIRCUIT NO /& Breaker Size "2O^ ROOMS BATH S Wire Size /£. T C w R f G S CIRCUIT NO IS Breaker Size 2.OA ROOMS LV/A5r4£^_ I Wire Size /2, T C w R I G S CIRCUIT NO "?fl Breaker Size ~2jDk ROOMS ^ Me* J^2_i Wire Size J ^t G T C w R 1 S CIRCUIT NO 2.1 Breaker Size Z.O A ROOMS pJjiAP^S- CIRCU Breaker Size A ROOMS Wire Size j 2. G T TN( C D w R I S Wire Size G T C CIRCUIT NO Breaker Size A ROOMS w R s Wire Size G T C w R s CIRCUIT NO Breaker Size A ROOMS Wire Size G T C w R s CIRCUIT NO Breaker Size A ROOMS Wire Size G T C w R s CIRCUIT NO Breaker Size A ROOMS Wire Size G T 1 certify that t and that all t« Company Name (Print) Electrician/Owner Name Electrician/Owner Signa C w R s CIRCUIT NO Breaker Size A ROOMS CIRCU Breaker Size A ROOMS Wire Size G T TN C 3 W R S Wire Size G T C CIRCUIT NO Breaker Size A ROOMS w R S Wire Size G T C w R S CIRCUIT NO Breaker Size A ROOMS Wire Size G T C w R S CIRCUIT NO Breaker Size A ROOMS Wire Size G T C w R S CIRCUIT NO Breaker Size A ROOMS Wire Size G T C w R S he above information is accurate and complete srminations are property torqued S+5 E l&xQ*^ (Print) ture rtifir Twv\ 5»VA-oA-~— Date THE C TY OF SAN D EGO Development Services Department Inspection Services Division 9601 Ridgehaven Court Suite 220 San Diego CA 92123 (858) 492 5070 Call (858) 581 7111 for Inspection Page Circuit Card (Supplemental) of a THIS CARD MUST BE FILLED OUT AND AVAILABLE ON THE JOB SITE FOR THE ROUCH INSPECTION THE USE OF THIS SUPPLEMENTAL CIRCUIT CARD REQUIRES THE USE OF THE PRIMARY1 CIRCUIT CARD AS PAGE 1 PERMIT/APPROVAL NO CBOb 30^4 PLAN FILE/PROJECT NO JOB ADDRESS (Pr nt Number Street Name Unit No ) 7£TK) CoLg-rA Cftj^T CIRCUIT NO <5 Breaker Size/ 5 A ROOMS biAii? &u Wire Size T 1 C h w a G R S & CIRCUIT NO // Breaker Size /^, A ROOMS GftftA<j£•j W re Size /y T & W' w R ft G S 2 CIRCUIT NO /^ Breaker Size 2.O A ROOMS RA-m 1 Wire Size / T C w 2. R | G S CIRCUIT NO /5 Breaker Size 2!©A ROOMS VCiT£\t<AJ Wire Size T C w r# R •^ G S CIRCUIT NO l~t Breaker Size Z^A ROOMS MICRO Wire Size /2t T C w R | G S CIRCUIT NO /«7 Breaker Size 2<£?A ROOMS •bi*ttuj«n^ Wire Size T 'I C w (2. G R S CIRCUIT NO JO Breaker Size / f> A ROOMS i<4ttV Li tf,N<7 &*v Wire Size /'/ T / C 2 way R G S '4 CIRCUIT NO f2. Breaker Size /S A ROOMS 0f?,c£ EfOffc/ 3TAifc> Wire Size f<f T Cd)W 4? R $ G S te Cl) CIRCUIT NO /4^ Breaker Size 2.OA ROOMS kiklr^ DlfO£. Wire Size / T C w 2- R 1 | G S CIRCUIT NO /£j Breaker Size 2O A ROOMS l< irtl+£/J Wire Size j'ZL T \ C w R 1 G S CIRCUIT NO fS Breaker Size ^0A ROOMS u: dtiMfi) Wire Size / 2 T C w R I G S CIRCUIT NO 2Gt Breaker Size "i.0 f\ ROOMS AA&&&ML Wire Size /^. G T C w R 1 S CIRCUIT NO Breaker Size A ROOMS CIRCU Breaker Size A ROOMS Wire Size G T TN C D w R s Wire Size G T C w R CIRCUIT NO Breaker Size A ROOMS s Wire Size G T C w CIRCUIT NO Breaker Size A ROOMS R s Wire Size G T C CIRCUIT NO Breaker Size A ROOMS w R s Wire Size G T C CIRCUIT NO Breaker Size A ROOMS w R s Wire Size G T 1 certify that t and that all te Company Name (Print) Electrician/Owner Name Electrician/Owner Signal California Electrician Cfir Date S» 2 C w R s CIRCUIT NO Breaker Size A ROOMS CIRCU Breaker Size A ROOMS Wire Size G T ITN C O W R S Wire Size G T C W R S CIRCUIT NO Breaker Size A ROOMS CIRCU Breaker Size A ROOMS CIRCU Breaker Size A ROOMS CIRCU Breaker Size A ROOMS Wire Size G T TN( C D W R S Wire Size G T TN( C 3 W R S Wire Size G T TNC C 3 W R S Wire Size G T C W R S lie above information is accurate and complete rmmations are properly torqued ^-K £i.£rr£/c (Print) ure tific HI -77>»r5M^ >^ jfion wjmberr D7 Development Services Department Inspection Services Division 9601 Ridgehaven Court Suite 220 San Diego CA 92123 (858) 492 5070 Circuit Card (Primary) Page 1 of 2L THE C TV OF SAN D EGO *"*" \O3O> 3O ' ' ' ' ' IUr "ISpeCUUIl THIS CARD MUST BE FILLED OUT AND AVAILABLE ON THE JOB SITE FOR THE ROUGH INSPECTION USE 'SUPPLEMENTAL' CIRCUIT CARD(S) FOR MORE THAN EIGHT (8) GENERAL USE CIRCUITS TOTAL SEE REVERSE SIDE PERMIT/APPROVAL NO PLAN FILE/PROJECT NO JOB ADDRESS (Print Number Street Name Unit No ) i CIRCUIT NO 1 Breaker Sze 15 A ROOMS Bedroom #1 Hall Bedroom #2 Bedroom #3 Garage 1 Name of each 2 List old and new 3 Use circuit space 4 San Diego Elect of 15 per genera 5 All circuit breake dead fronts R = Conve (Use actual num W eSize 14 G T C 1 2 1 1 w Room where devices on ss below for ncal Policy use circuit rs to be per Tail C nience Rec bers 1 2 3 R 2 1 4 © 1 sde sarr gen imit and man - r eptc to S 2 1 1 CD 1 vice e c era s cu 4p ent eili icle ide CIRCUIT NO / Breaker Size fa A ROOMS •ppn^i ly &**. ' Wire Size l*i G T C w R 7 s CIRCUIT NO 3 Breaker Size \C^ A ROOMS F'flU Wire Size f^l G T c w R i s CIRCUIT NO 'S Breaker Size (^ A ROOMS &ATfV / Wire Size j^f G T c "2j w I R s 3 CIRCUIT NO ~f Breaker Size/^ A ROOMS IXl^tl^A^ ffo*^r£*f Wire Size jtf G T U c w2,mV _- R s ^I CIRCUIT NO 2 Breaker S ze 20 A ROOMS Ktchen Kitchen D nmg Room Breakfast Nook s are located rcuit marking old de light and small app rrent consuming de\ er small appliance (2 y labeled at all servic ig Light W ~ Wall S = Switc itify amounts of ea WreSze 12 G T C w R CD 1 1 1 s /ices thus ® lance circuits only ices to a maximum 0 amp ) circuit :e and feeder pane Bracket Light h ch device type) CIRCUIT NO ^. Breaker Size f§ A ROOMS \rM Wire Size fff G T C w R / s CIRCUIT NO Y Breaker Size /S A ROOMS STo£/tt.£. f-Arvuiy ' Wire Size / i/ G T c •7 (7 w R fir ^ s f 2. CIRCUIT NO (y Breaker Size /5 A ROOMS 4-A^\t/V £*•/ Wire Size /*/ G T c 10 w R y s 3 CIRCUIT NO £ Breaker Size /5 A ROOMS OJTXI*^ Wire Size /^ G T c 7 w R I s Fill) Use remark SERVICE (Mam) FEEDER #1 FEEDER #2 (Subpanel) (Subpanel) COMPACTOR COOKTOP DISHWASHER DISPOSAL MICROWAVE OVEN RANGE DRYER LAUNDRY WATER HEATER A/C HEATING n applicable items below s as necessary to describe work NAME PLATE AMPS KW 209 too WIRE SIZE AL CU f"^ BREAKER SIZE (AMPS) 2C0 too REMARKS Computed Load AMPS AFCI Protected Circuits (list locations) IZjzjt* i/^jb'W GFCI Protected Circuits (list locations) /£/f£/^£X/ j2$fH Oun>f£yE Service Bond/Ground informs (a) D New (/) OR J^Exis (b) Bond/Ground Wire(s) Si2 c) Location of Cold Water Be (d) Location of Ground Clamp I certify that the ab and that all termina Company Name (Print) -^ Electrician/Owner Name(Prm Electrician/Owner Signature tion f ' tmg (/) :e(s) Type (/) D AL OR D CU ove information is accurate and complete tions are properly torqued t) "7^7f*"-A frflif*' S2t^*" ^~^tP^x^- / California Electrician Certification/Number Date ^/l.^ 1 0 ft 7 / / DS 1779 (Re 203) EsGil Corporation In Partnership with government for (Bmftfing Safety DATE December 5, 2006 JURISDICTION Carlsbad a PLAN REVIEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO 063094 SET II PROJECT ADDRESS 2070 Caleta Court PROJECT NAME SFD Addition/ Remodel for Burrows IXI The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction s building codes The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction s building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck The check list transmitted herewith is for your information The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck The applicant s copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person The applicant s copy of the check list has been sent to Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed Person contacted Telephone # Date contacted (by ) Fax # Mail Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS By Bert Domingo Enclosures Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC 11/28/06 trnsmtldot 9320 Chesapeake Drive Suite 208 + San Diego California 92123 + (858)560 1468 + Fax (858) 560 1576 EsGil Corporation In (Partnership with government for (RuiCding Safety DATE November 8, 2006 JURISDICTION Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO 063094 SET I PROJECT ADDRESS 2070 Caleta Court PROJECT NAME SFD Addition/Remodel for Burrows Q APPLICANT U PCANREVIEWER a FILE The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction s building codes The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction s building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck XI The check list transmitted herewith is for your information The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck The applicant s copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person X3 The applicant s copy of the check list has been sent to Scott Spencer 7527 Girard Avenue La Jolla CA 92037 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed X Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed aft Spencer Telephone # (619) 459 8898Person contacted Date contacted Mail Telephone REMARKS Fax # 8901 Fax y\r\ Person By Bert Domingo Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ Enclosures PC 10/30/06 trnsmtl dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive Suite 208 *• San Diego California 9212j *• (858)560 1468 + Fax (858) 560 1576 Carlsbad O63O94 November 8, 2O06 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES PLAN CHECK NO O63O94 JURISDICTION Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS 207O Caleta Court FLOOR AREA 1497 SQ FT STORIES ONE HEIGHT REMARKS DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION ESGIL CORPORATION 10/30/06 DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW PLAN REVIEWER Bert Domingo COMPLETED November 8, 2006 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ) This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code Uniform Plumbing Code Uniform Mechanical Code National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation noise attenuation and access for the disabled This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department Engineering Department Fire Department or other departments Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit Present California law mandates that residential construction comply with the 2001 edition of the California Building Code (Title 24) which adopts the following model codes 1997 UBC 2000 UPC 2000 UMC and 2002 NEC The above regulations apply to residential construction regardless of the code editions adopted by ordinance The following items listed need clarification modification or change All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations Per Sec 106 4 3 1997 Uniform Building Code the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state county or city law To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i e . plan sheet number, specification section, etc Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans Carlsbad O63O94 November 8, 2OO6 • PLANS 1 Please make all corrections as requested in the correction list Submit three new complete sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects) For expeditious processing corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways 1 Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department 1635 Faraday Ave Carlsbad CA 92008 (760) 602-2700 The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning Engmeenng and Fire Departments 2 Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation 9320 Chesapeake Drive Suite 208 San Diego CA 92123 (858)560-1468 Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning Engineering and Fire Departments NOTE Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete 2 Plans deviating from conventional wood frame construction shall have the structural portions signed and sealed by the California state licensed engineer or architect responsible for their preparation along with structural calculations (California Business and Professions Code) 3 Provide a statement on the Title Sheet of the plans stating that this project shall comply with the 2001 editions of the California Building/Plumbmg/Mechanical Codes and the 2004 edition of the California Electrical Code which adopt the 1997 UBC 2000 UMC 2000 UPC and the 2002 NEC 4 On the cover sheet of the plans specify any items requiring special inspection in a format similar to that shown below Section 106 3 2 • REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS In addition to the regular inspections the following checked items will also require Special Inspection in accordance with Sec 1701 of the Uniform Building Code ITEM REQUIRED"? REMARKS SOILS COMPLIANCE PRIOR TO FOUNDATION INSPECTION DESIGNER-SPECIFIED OTHER 5 When special inspection is required the architect or engineer of record shall prepare an inspection program which shall be submitted to the building official for approval prior to issuance of the building permit Please review Section 106 3 5 Please complete the attached form Carlsbad O63094 November 8, 2O06 . FIRE PROTECTION 6 Show locations of permanently wired smoke detectors with battery backup Please see item 7 below a) On each story NOTE Detectors shall sound an alarm audible in all sleeping areas of the unit Section 3109 1 7 When the valuation of a room addition or repair exceeds $1 000 or when sleeping rooms are created smoke detectors shall be provided per the above except that smoke detectors added at existing construction need only be battery powered Section 310 9 1 2 Please see item 6 above • GENERAL RESIDENTIAL REQUIREMENTS 8 Habitable rooms other than kitchens shall contain at least 70 square feet of floor area At least one room shall have not less than 120 square feet of floor area Section 310 6 2 9 Glazing in the following locations should be of safety glazing material in accordance with Section 2406 4 (see exceptions) a) Fixed or operable panels adjacent to a door where the nearest exposed edge of the glazing is within a 24 inch arc of either vertical edge of the door in a closed position and where the bottom exposed edge of the glazing is less than 60 inches above the walking surface Please see window L and E(See Mezzanine windows near the door to the deck) • ROOFING 10 Specify roof material and application Chapter 15 11 Specify on the plans the following information for the roof materials per Section 10633 a) Manufacturers name b) Product name/number c) ICBO approval number or equal 12 Specify roof slope 13 Specify minimum % inch per foot roof slope for drainage or design to support accumulated water Section 1506 1 14 Balconies and decks exposed to the weather and sealed underneath shall be sloped a minimum of % inch per foot for drainage Section 1402 3 Carlsbad O63094 November 8, 20O6 15 Provide skylight details to show compliance with Sections 2409 and 2603 or specify on the plans the following information for the skylight(s) per Section 10633 a) Manufacturers name b) Model name/number c) ICBO approval number or equal • GARAGE AND CARPORTS 16 Doors may open into the garage only if the floor or landing in the garage is not more than one inch lower than the door threshold Section 1003 316 • FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS 17 Note on the plan the soils classification whether or not the soil is expansive and note the allowable bearing value Section 106 3 3 18 The soils engineer recommended that he/she review the foundation excavations Note on the foundation plan that Prior to the contractor requesting a Building Department foundation inspection the soils engineer shall advise the building official in writing that a) The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report b) The utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted and c) The foundation excavations the soils expansive characteristics and bearing capacity conform to the soils report 19 Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soils report are properly incorporated into the construction documents 20 Show foundation sills to be pressure treated or equal Section 2306 4 • MECHANICAL (UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE) 21 Show the location type and size (BTU s) of all heating and cooling appliances or systems Please show how the addition would be heated 22 Every dwelling unit shall be provided with heating facilities capable of maintaining a room temperature of 70 degrees F at 3 feet above the floor in all habitable rooms Show basis for compliance UBC Sec 31011 Carlsbad O63094 November 8, 2006 • ELECTRICAL (NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE) 23 Note on the plans that receptacle outlet locations will comply with NEC Art 210-52(a) 24 GFCI protected receptacle outlets are required within 25 feet of all mechanical equipment (heating air-conditioning and refrigeration equipment) Please show on plans NEC 210 63 25 Show on the plans that countertop receptacle outlets comply with NEC Art 210-52(c) which reads as follows In kitchens and dining areas of dwelling units a receptacle outlet shall be installed at each counter space wider than 12 inches Receptacles shall be installed so that no point along the wall line is more than 24 inches measured horizontally from a receptacle outlet in that space Island and peninsular countertops 12 inches by 24 long (or greater) shall have at least one receptacle Counter top spaces separated by range tops refrigerators or sinks shall be considered as separate countertop spaces 26 Per NEC Art 210-11 (c)3 note on the plans that bathroom circuiting shall be either a) A 20 ampere circuit dedicated to each bathroom or b) At least one 20 ampere circuit supplying only bathroom receptacle outlets 27 Show on the plans a wall receptacle adjacent to each lavatory in the bathroom NEC Art 210-52(d) 28 Show on the plan that receptacle outlets in hallways comply with NEC Art 210-52(h) which reads as follows For hallways of 10 feet or more in length at least one receptacle outlet shall be required 29 All bedroom branch circuits now require arc fault protection Note clearly on the plans that Bedroom branch circuits will be arc fault circuit protected NEC Art 210-12(b) 30 Show on the plan that ground fault circuit-interrupter protection complies with NEC Art 210-8 which reads as follows All 125-volt single-phase 15-and 20- ampere receptacles installed in bathrooms garages basements outdoors kitchen counters and at wet bar sinks Carlsbad 063O94 November 8, 2OO6 • PLUMBING (UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE) 31 Show water heater size (1st hour rating) type and location on plans UPC Section 501 0 32 Note on the plans that Combustion air for fuel burning water heaters will be provided in accordance with UPC Section 507 and Table 5 1 • ENERGY CONSERVATION 33 Show on the plans compliance with the residential energy lighting requirements (Mandatory requirement) Please show on the plan the applicable fixtures and controls to verify conformance to the requirements shown below a) In the kitchen at least one-half of the wattage rating of the fixtures must be high efficacy with non-high efficacy fixtures switched separately Note Approximately % of the fixtures will be required to be of the high efficacy variety b) In bathrooms, garages, laundry rooms, and utility rooms all fixtures must be high efficacy style or be controlled by a manually on occupancy sensor c) All other rooms require any installed fixtures to be high efficacy or be controlled by a manually on occupancy sensor or dimmer (Closets under 70 square feet are exempt) d) Outdoor lighting fixtures are required to be high efficacy or controlled by a combination photocontrol/motion sensor Note Generally a high efficacy style of fixture is fluorescent complete with electronic ballasts Regular incandescent quartz halogen and halogen MR lamps do not comply • MISCELLANEOUS 34 Please show sheet index on the cover sheet 35 Please show on the plans the waterproofing materials for the decks Please show ICBO approval 36 The referenced detail 11/S5 0 does not show/not clear how the new diaphragm would be connected to the resisting element system 37 The referenced detail 12/S5 0 is just a sketch 38 It is not clear how the garage door line would be laterally supported Carlsbad O63O94 November 8, 2006 39 May need a drag connection for the collector of the easterly wall line of the family room 40 If part of this permit please show how the dining/living rooms would be vertically and laterally supported Please submit calculations 41 Please submit wind calculations to verify the controlling lateral load 42 Please identify the strap to be used @ the roof level along line 5(Please see detail 2 & 3/S5 0) 43 In Seismic Zone 4 aspect ratios are limited to 2 1 for wood shear panels Table 23-ll-G Please see the shear wall shown on page L9 of the calculations 44 Please show on the plans the recommendation shown on the page L9 for line 5 Please cross reference the same on the framing plan 45 A complete plan check will be made To speed up the review process note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed i e plan sheet note or detail number calculation page etc Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list If there are other changes please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate Yes a No Q The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive Suite 208 San Diego California 92123 telephone number of 858/560-1468 to perform the plan review for your project If you have any questions regarding these plan review items please contact Bert Domingo at Esgil Corporation Thank you Carlsbad O63O94 November 8, 2OO6 City of Carlsbad Building Department BUILDING DEPARTMENT NOTICE OF REQUIREMENT FOR SPECIAL INSPECTION Do Not Remove From Plans Plan Check No O63O94 Job Address or Legal Description 207O Caleta Court Owner Address You are hereby notified that in addition to the inspection of construction provided by the Building Department an approved Registered Special Inspector is required to provide continuous inspection dunng the performance of the phases of construction indicated on the reverse side of this sheet The Registered Special Inspector shall be approved by the City of Carlsbad Building Department prior to the issuance of the building permit Special Inspectors having a current certification from the City of San Diego Los Angeles or ICBO are approved as Special Inspectors for the type of construction for which they are certified The inspections by a Special Inspector do not change the requirements for inspections by personnel of the City of Carlsbad building department The inspections by a Special Inspector are in addition to the inspections normally required by the County Building Code The Special Inspector is not authorized to inspect and approve any work other than that for which he/she is specifically assigned to inspect The Special Inspector is not authorized to accept alternate matenals structural changes or any requests for plan changes The Special Inspector is required to submit wntten reports to the City of Carlsbad building department of all work that he/she inspected and approved The final inspection appro\al will not be given until all Special Inspection reports have been received and approved by the City of Carlsbad building department Please submit the names of the inspectors who will perform the special inspections on each of the items indicated on the reverse side of this sheet (over) Carlsbad 063094 11/8/06 Special Inspection Program Address or Legal Description 2070 Caleta Court, Carlsbad, CA 92009 Plan Check Number 063094 Owner's Name Richard Burrows I as the owner or agent of the owner (contractors may not employ the special inspector) certify that I or the architect/engineer of record will be responsible for employing the special mspector(s) as required by the California Building Code (CBC) Section 1701 1 for the construction project located at the site listed above CBC Section 106 3 5 Signed I as the architect/engineer of record certify that I have prepared the following special inspection program as required by CBC Section 106 3 5 for the construction project located at the site listed abo\_ seal ^f^-^*^ Signe 1 Lost of work requiring special inspection A Soils compliance prior to foundation inspection F Field welding B Structural concrete over 2500 psi D D C Prestressed concrete D Structural masonry G High strength bolting H Expansion/epoxy anchors Designer specified I Sprayed-on fireproofmg J Other 2 Name(s) of Individuals or Firm(s) responsible for the special inspections listed above A Charlie Hiltz GEI (858) 549-7222 F TomContasti #839 SCS&T (619)280-4321 H TomContasti #839 SCS&T (619)2804321 3 Duties of the special inspector A Compliance with soils report F Continuous special inspection for welding per CBC 1701 5 including checking welder qualifications welding procedures and visual inspection of welds H On-site special inspection for items noted in the manufacturer s ICBO or ER report Special Inspectors shall check in with the City and present their credentials for approval prior to beginning work on the job site Carlsbad 063094 11/8/06 Special Inspection Program Address or Legal Description 2070 Caleta Court. Carlsbad. CA 92009 Plan Check Number 063094 Owner's Name Richard Burrows I as the owner or agent of the owner (contractors may not employ the special inspector) certify that I or the architect/engineer of record will be responsible for employing the special mspector(s) as required by the California Building Code (CBC) Section 1701 1 for the construction project located at the site listed above CBC Section 106 3 5 Signed I as the architect/engineer of record certify that I have prepared the following special inspection program as required by CBC Section 106 3 5 for the construction project located at the site listed abovem __^a^^^^ seal, I ^a***^ Signed 1 List of work requiring special inspection IX! A Soils compliance prior to foundation inspection [H B Structural concrete over 2500 psi EH C Prestressed concrete EH D Structural masonry O E Designer specified Kl F Field welding X£ttUJ95i!^ X G High strength bolting H Expansion/epoxy anchors I Sprayed-on fireproofmg J Other 2 Name(s) of Individuals or Firm(s) responsible for the special inspections listed above A Charlie Hiltz GEI (858) 549-7222 F TomContasti #839 SCS&T (619)280-4321 H TomContasti #839 SCS&T (619)280-4321 3 Duties of the special inspector A Compliance with soils report F Continuous special inspection for welding per CBC 1701 5 including checking welder qualifications welding procedures and visual inspection of welds H On-site special inspection for items noted in the manufacturers ICBO or ER report Special Inspectors shall check in with the City and present their credentials for approval prior to beginning work on the job site Carlsbad O63094 November 8, 2006 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION Carlsbad PREPARED BY Bert Domingo BUILDING ADDRESS 2O70 Caleta Court PLAN CHECK NO 063O94 DATE November 8, 2006 BUILDING OCCUPANCY R3 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION VN BUILDING PORTION Addition Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE Jurisdiction Code AREA ( Sq Ft ) 1497 cb Valuation Multiplier 121 94 By Ordinance Reg Mod VALUE ($) 182544 182,544 $802 20 Plan Check Fee by Ordinance ' Type of Re/iew Zl Complete Review CH Repettive Fee ~^ Repeats Comments D Other r—j Hourly Structural Only Hour Esgil Plan Review Fee $521 43 $449 23 Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue doc /e/3/A City of Carlsbad Public Works — Ehgineesririg DATE BUILDING ADDRESS PROJECT DESCRIPTION ASSESSOR S PARCEL NUMBER BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST PLANCHECK NO EST VALUE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL The item you have submitted for review has been approved The approval is based on plans information and/or specifications provided in your submittal therefore any changes to these items after this date including field modifications must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes Please review carefully all comments attached as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to build D A Right of Way permit is required prior to construction of the following improvements DENIAL Please see the attached report of deficiencies marked with D Make necessary corrections to plans or specifications for compliance with applicable codes and standards Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review Only the applicable sheets have been sent By By By Date Date Date By FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY fGINEERING AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE BUILDING PERMIT Date D D D D D D ATTACHMENTS Dedication Application Dedication Checklist Improvement Application Improvement Checklist Neighborhood Improvement Agreement Grading Permit Application Grading Submittal Checklist Right of Way Permit Application Right of Way Permit Submittal Checklist and Information Sheet ENGINEERING DEPT CONTACT PERSON Name KATHLEEN M FARMER City of Carlsbad Address 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 Phone (760) 602 2741 NOTE If there are retaining walls associated with your project, please check with the Building Department if these walls need to be pulled by separate RETAINING WALL PERMIT A4 - '©Sirlsbad CA 92OO|B 7314 • (76O) 6O2 272O • FAX (760) 60® BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST SITE PLAN 1 Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale Show North Arrow / B/TExistmg & Proposed Structures /C./Existing Street Improvements /JET Property Lines (show all dimensions / E/Easements 2 Show on site plan ight of Way Width & Adjacent Streets riveway widths xistmg or proposed sewer lateral Existing or proposed water service xistmg or proposed irrigation service D A Drainage Patterns 1 Building pad surface drainage must maintain a minimum slope of one percent towards an adjoining street or an approved drainage course 2 ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE Finish grade will provide a minimum positive drainage of 2% to swale 5 away from building B Existing & Proposed Slopes and Topography C Size type location alignment of existing or proposed sewer and water service (s) that serves the project Each unit requires a separate service however second dwelling units and apartment complexes are an exception D Sewer and water laterals should not be located within proposed driveways per standards 3 Include on title sheet A Site address B Assessor s Parcel Number C Legal Description For commercial/industrial buildings and tenant improvement projects include total building square footage with the square footage for each different use existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing warehouse office etc ) previously approved EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION Show all existing use of SF and new proposed use of SF Example Tenant Improvement for 3500 SF of warehouse to 3500 SF of office thy*lASTERS\B Id g PI noheck Ckl I F m (G ) d BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST ST1 D 2ND D 3RD D DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE 4a Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of approval for Project No D D 4b All conditions are in compliance Date DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS Q D 5 Dedication for all street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the building site and any storm drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and for remodels with a value at or exceeding $ 17.000 pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18 40 030 Dedication required as follows Dedication required Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8 V* x 11 plat map and submit with a title report All easement documents must be approved and signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process Submit the completed application form with the required checklist items and fees to the Engineering Department in person Applications will not be accept by mail or fax Dedication completed by Date IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS 6a All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the construction exceeds $ 82,000 pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 1840040 Public improvements required as follows Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public improvement requirements A registered Civil Engineer must prepare the appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements on the attached checklist to the Engineering Department through a separate plan check process The completed application form and the requirements on the F \F rm \KATHYWASTERS\B Id ng PI ch ck CMst F rm (O rte) doc R 7/14/00 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1ST D NO2 D RD3 D ODD checklist must be submitted in person Applications by mail or fax are not accepted Improvement plans must be approved appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of building permit Improvement Plans signed by Date 6b Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 1840 Please submit a recent property title report or current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $ 400 00 so we may prepare the necessary Neighborhood Improvement Agreement This agreement must be signed notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building permit Future public improvements required as follows D D 6c Enclosed please find your Neighborhood Improvement Agreement Please return agreement signed and notarized to the Engineering Department Neighborhood Improvement Agreement completed by Date D D D 6d No Public Improvements required SPECIAL NOTE Damaged or defective improvements found adiacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction of the City Inspector prior to occupancy GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS nan a D The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section 11 06 030 of the Municipal Code 7a Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading requirements Include accurate grading quantities in cubic yards (cut fill import export and remedial) This information must be included on the plans 7b Grading Permit required A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer must be submitted together with the completed application form attached NOTE The Grading Permit must be issued and rough grading approval obtained prior to issuance of a Building Permit Grading Inspector sign off by Date 7c Graded Pad Certification required (Note Pad certification may be required even if a grading permit is not required ) F \F nnertKATH\TMASTERS\B HI g PI check Cklsl F m (G he) a BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST ST 1 D ND2n RD3 D ODD D D D 7d No Grading Permit required 7e If grading is not required write No Grading on plot plan MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS 8 A RIGHT-OF WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-Way and/or private work adjacent to the public Right of Way Types of work include but are not limited to street improvements tree trimming driveway construction tying into public storm dram sewer and water utilities Right of-Way permit required for D D D D D INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT If your facility is located in the City of Carlsbad sewer service area you need to contact the Carlsbad Municipal Water District located at 5950 El Cammo Real Carlsbad CA 92008 District personnel can provide forms and assistance and will check to see if your business enterprise is on the EWA Exempt List You may telephone (760) 438-2722 extension 7153 for assistance Industrial Waste permit accepted by Date NPDES PERMIT D 10a Storm Water Requirements Applicability Checklist Completed D D a a 10b Priority Determination and compliance D Priority Project D Subject to Standard Permanent Storm Water BMPs D Exempt equired fees are attached No fees required WATER METER REVIEW 12a Domestic (potable) Use Ensure that the meter proposed by the owner/developer is not oversized Oversized meters are inaccurate during low-flow conditions If it is oversized for the life of the meter the City will not accurately bill the owner for the water used • All single family dwelling units received standard 1 service with 5/8 service F \F mi r\KATHY\MASTERS\B Id g PI check Cklst F rm (G nc) doc , ST -,ND ,RD nan 12b BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST • If owner/developer proposes a size other than the standard then owner/developer must provide potable water demand calculations, which include total fixture counts and maximum water demand in gallons per minute (gpm) A typical fixture count and water demand worksheet is attached Once the gpm is provided check against the meter sizing schedule to verify the anticipated meter size for the unit • Maximum service and meter size is a 2 service with a 2 meter • If a developer is proposing a meter greater than 2 , suggest the installation of multiple 2 services as needed to provide the anticipated demand (manifolds are considered on case by case basis to limit multiple trenching into the street) Irrigation Use (where recycled water is not available) All irrigation meters must be sized via irrigation calculations (in gpm) prior to approval The developer must provide these calculations Please follow these guidelines 1 If the project is a newer development (newer than 1998) check the recent improvement plans and observe if the new irrigation service is reflected on the improvement sheets If so at the water meter station the demand in gpm may be listed there Irrigation services are listed with a circled I and potable water is typically a circled W The irrigation service should look like o-,STA1+00 Install 2 service and 5 meter (estimated 100 gpm) If the improvement plans do not list the irrigation meter and the service/meter will be installed via another instrument such as the building plans or grading plans (w/ a right of way permit of course) then the applicant must provide irrigation calculations for estimated worst case irrigation demand (largest zone with the farthest reach) Typically Larry Black has already reviewed this if landscape plans have been prepared but the applicant must provide the calculations to you for your use Once you have received a good example of irrigation calculations keep a set for your reference In general the calculations will include • Hydraulic grade line • Elevation at point of connection (POC) • Pressure at POC in pounds per square inch (PSI) • Worse case zone (largest farthest away from valve • Total Sprinkler heads listed (with gpm use per head) • Include a 10% residual pressure at point of connection In general all major sloped areas of a subdivision/project are to be irrigated via separate irrigation meters (unless the project is only SFD with no HOA) As long as the project is located within the City recycled water F m K ttvy\MASl ERSSB id g PI h k CkM F m (G .•ST BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST pND 0RD service boundary the City intends on switching these irrigation services/meters to a new recycled water line in the future n D 12c Irrigation Use (where recycled water is available) 1 Recycled water meters are sized the same as the irrigation meter above 2 If a project fronts a street with recycled water then they should be connecting to this line to irrigate slopes within the development For subdivisions this should have been identified and implemented on the improvement plans Installing recycled water meters is a benefit for the applicant since they are exempt from paying the San Diego County Water Capacity fees However if they front a street which the recycled water is there but is not live (sometimes they are charged with potable water until recycled water is available) then the applicant must pay the San Diego Water Capacity Charge If within three years the recycled water line is charged with recycled water by CMWD then the applicant can apply for a refund to the San Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA) for a refund However let the applicant know that we cannot guarantee the refund and they must deal with the SDCWA for this D D D 13 Additional Comments F F m \K It y\MASTEHS\B d g PI heck Ckl I F m (G ) d ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET D Estimate based on unconfirmed information from applicant D Calculation based on building plancheck plan submittal Address Bldg Permit No Prepared by Date Checked by Date EDU CALCULATIONS List types and square footages for all uses Types of Use Sq Ft /Units Sq Ft /UnitsTypes of Use APT CALCULATIONS List types and square footages for all uses Types of Use Sq Ft /Units Types of Use Sq Ft /Units EDU s EDU s ADT s ADTs FEES REQUIRED WITHIN CFD D YES (no bridge & thoroughfare fee in District #1 reduced Traffic Impact Fee) D NO D 1 PARK IN LIEU FEE FEE/UNIT PARK AREA & # X NO UNITS = $ D 2 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ADT s/UNITS FEE/ADT = $ D a a a 3 BRIDGE AND THOROUGHFARE FEE ADT s/UNITS 4 FACILITIES MANAGEMENT FEE UNIT/SO FT 5 SEWER FEE EDU s BENEFIT AREA EDU s 6 SEWER LATERAL ($2 500) (DIST X ZONE X X X #1 DIST #2 FEE/ADT FEE/SO FT /UNIT FEE/EDU FEE/EDU DIST #3 ) = $ = $ -$ = $ = $ D 7 DRAINAGE FEES PLDA_ ACRES HIGH /LOW X FEE/AC = $ D 8 POTABLE WATER FEES UNITS CODE CONNECTION FEE METER FEE SDCWA FEE IRRIGATION Iof2 RPU 7/14/00 PLANNING/ENGINEERING APPROVALS ADDRBSS O DATl ADDITION MINOR «$ 10,000.00) PLAZA CAMNO RIAL CARLSBAD COMPANY STORM VILLACI FAIR! COMMIT! OFHCI BUILDING OTHER DAT! DAT! Geotechnical Exploration, Inc. SOIL AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING • GROUNDWATER • ENGINEERING GEOLOGY 21 November 2006 Scott A Spencer and Associates Job No 06-9157 7577 Girard Avenue La Jolla, CA 92037 Attn Scott Spencer Subject Foundation Plan Review Burrows Residence Proposed Additions and Remodel 2070 Caleta Court Rancho La Costa, California Dear Mr Spencer As requested, we have reviewed the pertinent parts of a set of 2 sheets (S2 0 and S4 0) of foundation plans and details prepared by Cottrell Engineering for the subject project The pertinent parts of the reviewed set of plans, undated, are included in the structural plans The pertinent parts of the reviewed plans were reviewed from a geotechnical engineering viewpoint to verify their adequate incorporation of our recommendations presented in our geotechnical investigation report for the project The project plans indicate that new footings and slabs on grade will be built to support the additions Structural details indicate that new footings and slabs will be attached (dowelled) to existing foundations or slabs where applicable The new slab on grade and foundations are specified to be reinforced at least per our recommendations presented in our Report of Limited Geotechnical Investigation, Burrows Residence Remodel and Additions, 2070 Cakta Court, Carlsbad, California , Job No 06-9157, dated May 8, 2006 Since recommendations for the soil preparation prior to construction of the proposed additions are not indicated in the plans, we recommend that the general contractor and the concrete contractor to build the foundation be provided with a copy of this letter and of our report dated May 8, 2006 for them to read about the soil preparation needed prior to foundation construction As indicated in our Report of Limited Geotechnical Investigation, dated May 8, 2006, soil preparation shall be made under observations and soil testing by a representative of our 7420 TRADE STREET* SAN DIEGO, CA 92121 • (858) 549 7222 • FAX (858) 549 1604 • EMAIL geotech@gei sd com Burrows Residence Remodel and Additions Carlsbad, California Job No 06-9157 Page 2 firm Foundation excavations shall also be evaluated and approved by a representative of our firm prior to forms and steel placement All other recommendations presented in our May 8, 2006 report on the project remain applicable, unless superseded in writing by our firm LIMITATIONS The findings and opinions presented herein have been made in accordance with current generally accepted principles and practice in the field of geotechnical engineering within the City of Carlsbad No warranty, either expressed or implied, is made If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact our office Reference to our Job No 06-9157 will help expedite a response to your inquiry Respectfully submitted, GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION, INC R C E 34422/G E 2007 Senior Geotechnical Engineer CC Mr and Mrs Richard Burrows Mr Thomas Cottrell I I I i I I p I xim REPORT OF LIMITED GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Burrows Residence Remodel and Additions 2070 Caleta Court Carlsbad, California "?";"<$ 0°" ° o r^y^/•^3$>£* vjt^^\\ I I I I I Geotechnica'Exploration, Inc. II II II I I REPORT OF LIMITED GEOTECHNICAL • INVESTIGATION Burrows Residence Remodel and Additions 2070 Caleta Court • Carlsbad, California I I JOB NO 06-9157 08 May 2006 I I I I I I I I I I Prepared for Mr and Mrs Richard Burrows I n I I I I i I 11 I I I I I I I i I Geotechnical Exploration, Inc SOIL AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING • GROUNDWATER • ENGINEERING GEOLOGY 08 May 2006 Mr and Mrs Richard Burrows Job No 06-9157 2070 Caleta Court Carlsbad, CA 92009 Subject Report of Limited Geotechnical Investigation Burrows Residence Remodel and Additions 2070 Caleta Court Carlsbad, California Dear Mr and Mrs Burrows In accordance with your request, and our proposal of February 22, 2006, Geotechnical Exploration, Inc has performed a limited geotechnical investigation of the subject site The field work was performed on March 6, 2006 If the conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are incorporated into the design and construction of the proposed residence additions and associated improvements, it is our opinion that the site is suitable for the proposed project This opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated Should you have any questions concerning the following report, please do not hesitate to contact us Reference to our Job No 06-9157 will expedite a response to your inquiries Respectfully submitted, GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION, INC JaTfne A Cerros, P E i R C E 34422/G E 2007 Senior Geotechnical Engineer 7420 TRADE STREET* SAN DIEGO, CA 92121 • (858) 549 7222 • FAX (858) 549 1604 • EMAIL geotech@gei sd i om II |l TABLE OF CONTENTS |1 PAGE |fl I PROJECT SUMMARY 1 II SITE DESCRIPTION 2 |" III FIELD INVESTIGATION 3 I IV LABORATORY TESTS AND SOIL INFORMATION 4 i V SOIL DESCRIPTION 6 • VI SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS 7 • VII GROUNDWATER 8 VIII CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 9 I IX GRADING NOTES 21 • X LIMITATIONS 22 • FIGURES I Vicinity Map • II Plot Plan • Illa-d Excavation Logs IV Laboratory Data Summary 1 APPENDICES fm A Unified Soil Classification System I I I i i (I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I REPORT OF LIMITED GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Burrows Residence Remodel and Additions 2070 Caleta Court Carlsbad, California Job No 06-9157 The following report presents the findings and recommendations of Geotechnicaf Exploration, Inc for the subject project I PROJECT SUMMARY It is our understanding, based on review of preliminary plans prepared by W Dean Meredith, Architect, A I A , that the existing two-story, single-family residence is to undergo a remodel including new single-story additions to be built on the west side of the existing residence and on the north and west sides of the existing guest house, and associated improvements The existing improvements and vegetation will be removed in the area of the new additions The additions are to be constructed of standard-type building materials utilizing conventional foundations with slab-on-grade floors Construction plans for development of the site have not been provided to us during the preparation of this report, however, when completed they should be made available for our review With the above in mind, the Scope of Work performed for this investigation is briefly outlined as follows 1 Identify and classify the surface and subsurface soils in the area of Ihe proposed construction, m conformance with the Unified Soil Classification System 2 Recommend site preparation and grading procedures ll p(I ll I ll I I I I I I I I I I I I I Burrows Residence Additions Job No 06-91'57 Carlsbad, California Page 2 3 Recommend the allowable bearing capacities for the on-site medium dense (firm to stiff) natural soils or properly compacted fills \ 4 Recommend preliminary foundation design information and provide paseive earth pressures to be utilized in design for resistance to lateral loads 5 Evaluate the settlement potential of the bearing soils under the anticipated structural loads ' i Our investigation revealed that the proposed addition areas of the site are underlain by medium dense (firm to stiff), clayey silt and silty sand formational materials with a surficial covering of approximately V/2 to 3 feet of moist to wet, loose to medium dense, silty and clayey sand fill soil Due to their very moist condition and variable density, these surficial fill soils will not provide a stable soil base for the proposed structure additions and associated improvements As such, we recommend that the surficial soils be removed and recompacted to a depth of approximately 2 feet as part of site preparation prior to the addition of any new fill or structural improvements New foundation excavations and any areas to receive concrete improvements should be evaluated by our field representative prior to placemen! of forms, steel placement and concrete placement II SITE DESCRIPTION The property is known as Assessor's Parcel No 215-110-19-00, Lot 56 and that portion of Lot 55 of La Costa Valley Unit No 1, according to Map No 5434, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California See Figure No I for Vicinity Map I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Burrows Residence Additions Job No 06-9157 Carlsbad, California Page 3 The approximately 20,000-square-foot developed lot is located at 2070 Caleta Court, in the La Costa area of the City of Carlsbad The lot has been graded into an easterly sloping hillside The property is a wedge-shaped building pad bounded to the north and southwest by similar residential properties at slightly higher and lower elevations, respectively, to the east by an east-facing hillside slope that descends to the No 2 fairway of the La Costa Golf Course, and to the west by Ihe east side of the Caleta Court cul-de-sac (see Figure No II) The existing structure on the property consists of a two-story residence (single- story with upper clear story) constructed of standard wood frame and stucco construction and founded on a slab-on-grade with a continuous perimeter footing A detached single-story guesthouse is located near the southwest corner of ihe property and is also founded on a slab-on-grade with a continuous perimeter footing The garage is attached, with access provided by a concrete driveway at the northwest corner of the property The relatively level building pad is at an approximate elevation of 80 feet above mean sea level (MSL) The property slopes gently to the east towards the qolf course Survey information concerning approximate elevations across the site was obtained from a Limited Topographic Plat prepared by Sowards and Brown Engineering, Inc , dated June 8, 2005 III FIELD INVESTIGATION Five exploratory handpit excavations were placed at the site In addition, three shallow observation holes were placed on the rear slope between the property line fence and the golf course to observe the suspected near-surface clay soil conditions as indicated by the presence of large desiccation cracks on the ground surface 1 he handpit excavations were placed in areas where the proposed additions and I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Burrows Residence Additions Carlsbad, California Job No 06-91S7 Page 4 improvements are to be located in order to obtain representative soil samples to define a soil profile at the addition locations (for excavation locations, see Figure No II) The soils encountered in the handpit excavations were logged by our field representative and samples were taken of the predominant soils types Excavation logs have been prepared on the basis of our observations and laboratory testing and the results have been summarized on Figure Nos III and IV ' The predominant soils have been classified in conformance with the Unified Soil Classification System (refer to Appendix A) IV LABORATORY TESTS AND SOIL INFORMATION Laboratory tests were performed on disturbed and relatively undisturbed soil samples in order to evaluate their physical and mechanical properties and their ability to support the proposed residential additions and improvements Test results are presented on Figure Nos III and IV The following tests were conducted on the sampled soils 1 Moisture Content (ASTM D2216-98) 2 Density Measurements (ASTM Dl586-98) 3 Laboratory Compaction Characteristics (ASTM Dl557-98) 4 Determination of Percentage of Particles Smaller than No 200 Sieve (ASTM D1140) 5 Expansion Test (UBC Test Method 29-2) The moisture content of a soil sample is a measure of the water content, expressed as a percentage of the dry weight of the sample I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Burrows Residence Additions Carlsbad, California Job No 06-9157 Page 5 Density measurements were performed by ASTM method D1586-98 on soils collected by the Split-Barrel Sampling of Soils of a sampler driven with a manual hammer This helps to establish the in situ density of retrieved samples Laboratory compaction values establish the optimum moisture content and the laboratory maximum dry density of the tested soils The relationship between the moisture and density of remolded soil samples gives qualitative mformatfon regarding soil compaction conditions to be anticipated during any future grading operation In addition, this relation helps to establish the relative compaction of existing fill soils The -200 sieve size analysis helps to more precisely classify the tested soils based on their fine material content, and to provide qualitative information related to engineering characteristics such as expansion potential, permeability, and shear strength The expansion potential of soils is determined, when necessary, utilizing the Uniform Building Code Test Method for Expansive Soils (UBC Standard No 29 2) In accordance with the UBC (Table 18-1-B), potentially expansive soils are classified as follows EXPANSION INDEX Oto20 21 to 50 51 to 90 91 to 130 Above 130 POTENTIAL EXPANSION Very low Low Medium High Very high I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Burrows Residence Additions Job No 06-911)? Carlsbad, California Page 6 Based on our laboratory testing, our visual classification, and our experience with similar soils, it is our opinion that the on-site fill and natural soils have a low to medium expansion potential Based on the laboratory test data, our observations of the primary soil types on the project, and our previous experience with laboratory testing of similar soils, our Geotechnical Engineer has assigned conservative values for the, angle of internal friction and cohesion for those soils that will provide significant lateral support or bearing functions on the project The assigned values have been utilized in developing the recommended bearing value as well as passive earth pressure design criteria for resistance to lateral loads V SOIL DESCRIPTION In general, the subject site is underlain at shallow depth by formational silty sand and clayey silt Fill soils were encountered ranging from V/2 to 3 feet in depth below the pad elevation and were encountered in all of the exploratory excavations Fill Soils (Oaf) The encountered fill soils consist primarily of moist to wet, loose to medium dense, silty and clayey sand fill soil derived from the underlying formational materials The fill soils have low to medium expansion potential and range in thickness from approximately V/2 to 3 feet in depth Due to their very moist condition and variable density, these surficial fill soils are not suitable in their current condition for support of loads from structures or additional fill Refer to Figures Nos III and IV Del Mar Formation (Td) Formational materials were encountered at all excavation locations below the fill soils The encountered Del Mar formational materials consist of medium dense, tan-gray and brown silty sand and firm to stiff, gray-green and 9 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Burrows Residence Additions Job No 06-9157 Carlsbad, California Page 7 brown clayey silt The formational soils were encountered at depths of I1/z to 3 feet in all of the exploratory excavations The formational soils have low to medium expansion potential and good bearing strength characteristics (refer to Figure Nos III and IV) Footings The existing residence footing, as observed at the location of exploratory excavations HP-4 and HP-5, measured 24 inches deep and are assumed to be at least 12 inches wide Refer to Figure Nos Hid and Hie for footing dimensions VI SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS The San Diego County area, as most of California, is located in a seismically active region The San Diego area has been referred to as the eastern edge of the Southern California Continental Borderland, an extension of the Peninsular Ranges Geomorphic Province The borderland is part of a broad tectonic boundary between the North American and Pacific Plates The plate boundary is dominated by a complex system of active major strike-slip (right lateral), northwest-trending faults extending from the San Andreas Fault, about 70 miles east, to the San Clemente Fault about 50 miles west of the San Diego metropolitan area Based on a review of available published information, including the County of San Diego Faults and Epicenters Map and the Geologic Map for the area (Weber, 1982), there are no faults known to pass through the site The prominent fault zones generally considered to have the most potential for earthquake damage in the vicinity of the site are the active Rose Canyon, located approximately 6 miles to the southwest, the Coronado Bank fault zone mapped approximately 21 miles southwest of the site, and the active Elsmore and San Jacmto fault zones mapped approximately 23 to 45 miles northeast of the site, respectively V II II II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Burrows Residence Additions Job No 06-9157 Carlsbad, California Page 8 Although research on earthquake prediction has greatly increased in recent years, seismologists and geologists have not yet reached the point where they can predict when and where an earthquake will occur Nevertheless, on the basis of current technology, it is reasonable to assume that the residence and proposed additions may be subject to the effects of at least one moderate to major earthquake during its design life During such an earthquake, the danger from fault offset through the site is remote, but relatively strong ground shaking is likely to occur i In our opinion, based on the available information, no landsliding, soil liquefaction or soil strength loss is anticipated to occur at the site due to a seismic event VII GROUNDWATER No groundwater was encountered during the course of our field investigation, however, the near-surface soils were observed to be very moist to wet in the landscaped areas Significant groundwater problems are not anticipated in the future — if the addition areas are developed as proposed and proper drainage is maintained Construction of a subdram across the front of the westerly additions may be required if a perched water condition is encountered during grading of the lot It should be kept in mind that any required grading operations could change surface drainage patterns and/or reduce permeabilities due to the densification of compacted soils Such changes of surface and subsurface hydrologic conditions, plus irrigation of landscaping or significant increases in rainfall, may result in the appearance of surface or near-surface water at locations where none existed previously The appearance of such water is expected to be localized and cosmetic in nature, if good positive drainage is implemented, as recommended in this report, during and at the completion of construction I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Burrows Residence Additions Job No 06-91h7 Carlsbad, California Page 9 On properties such as the subject site, where low permeability fine-grained soils exist at shallow depths, even normal landscape irrigation practices or periods of extended rainfall can result in shallow 'perched" water conditions The perching (shallow depth) accumulation of water on a low permeability surface can result in areas of persistent wetting and drowning of lawns, plants and trees Resolution of such conditions, should they occur, may require site-specific design dnd construction of subdram and shallow "wick" dram dewatenng systems It must be understood that unless discovered during initial site exploration or encountered during site grading operations, it is extremely difficult to predict if or where perched or true groundwater conditions may appear in the future When site fill or formational soils are fine-grained and of low permeability, water problems may not become apparent for extended periods of time Water conditions, where suspected or encountered during construction, should be evaluated and remedied by the project civil and geotechnical consultants The project developer and homeowner, however, must realize that post-construction appearances of groundwater may have to be dealt with on a site-specific basis VIII CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The following conclusions and recommendations are based on the practical field investigation conducted by our firm, and laboratory tests, in conjunction with our knowledge and experience with the soils in the La Costa area of Carlsbad Our geotechnical investigation revealed that the proposed addition areas of the site are underlain by medium dense (firm to stiff) silty sand and clayey silt formational materials with a surficial covering of approximately V/2 to 3 feet of moist to wet, loose to medium dense, silty and clayey sand fill soil Due to their very moist I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Burrows Residence Additions Job No 06-9157 Carlsbad, California Page 10 condition and variable density, these surficial fill soils will not provide a stable soil base for the proposed structure additions and associated improvements As such, we recommend that the surficial soils be removed and recompacted to a depth of approximately 2 feet as part of site preparation prior to the addition of any new fill or structural improvements New foundation excavations and any areas to receive concrete improvements should be evaluated by our field representative prior to placement of forms, steel placement and concrete placement | i The opinions, conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are contingent upon Geotechnical Exploration, Inc being retained to review the final plans and specifications as they are developed and to observe the site earthwork and installation of foundations A Preparation of Soils for Addition-area Development 1 Clearing and Stripping The existing improvements and vegetation on the site should be removed prior to the preparation of the building pads for the additions and areas of associated improvements This includes any roots from existing trees and shrubbery Holes resulting from the removal of root systems or other buried obstructions that extend below the planned grades should be cleared and backfilled with properly compacted fill 2 Treatment of Existing Fill In order to provide suitable foundation support for the proposed additions and associated improvements, we recommend that all existing fill soils (estimated to be approximately 2 feet in depth) be removed and recompacted The recompaction work should consist of (a) removing all existing fill down to the firm, native formational materials, (b) scarifying, moisture conditioning, and compacting the exposed subgrade formational soils, and (c) replacing the fill material as compacted structural fill The areal I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Burrows Residence Additions Job No 06-9157 Carlsbad, California Page 11 extent and depth required to remove the fills should be determined by our representative during the excavation work based on their examination of the soils being exposed Any unsuitable materials (such as oversize rubble and/or organic matter) should be selectively removed as indicated by our representative and disposed of off-site In general, excavations for soil removal and recompaction should extend to at least 5 feet beyond perimeter lines of the structure or improvement when feasible Any rigid improvements founded on the existing variable density fill soils can be expected to undergo movement and possible damage Geotechnscal Exploration, Inc takes no responsibility for the performance of any improvements built on loose natural soils or inadequately compacted fills Any exterior area to receive concrete improvements should be verified for compaction and moisture within 48 hours prior to concrete placement 3 Subgrade Preparation After the proposed addition area of the site has been cleared, stripped, and the required excavations made, the exposed subgrade soils in areas to receive fill and/or building improvements should be scarified to a depth of 6 inches, moisture conditioned, and compacted to the requirements for structural fill 4 Expansive Soil Conditions We do not anticipate that highly expansive < lay soils will be encountered during grading Medium expansive soils are anticipated to be encountered Should such soils be encountered and used as fill, however, they should be scarified, moisture conditioned to at least 5 percent above optimum moisture content, compacted to at least 90 percent, and be placed in non-building areas I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Burrows Residence Additions Job No 06-9157 Carlsbad, California Page 12 5 Material for Fill All existing on-site soils with an organic content of less than 3 percent by volume are, in general, suitable for use as fill Any required imported fill material should be a low-expansion potential (Expansion Index of 30 or less per ASTM D4829-95), granular soil with a plasticity index of 12 or less In addition, both imported and existing on-site materials for use as fill should not contain rocks or lumps more than 6 inches in greatest dimension, not more than 15 percent larger than 21/2 inches, and no more than 25 percent of the fill should be larger than 1/4-mch All materials for use i as fill should be approved by our representative prior to filling or importing to the site 6 Fill Compaction All structural fill should be compacted to a minimum degree of compaction of 90 percent based upon ASTM D1557-98 Fill material should be spread and compacted in uniform horizontal lifts not exceeding 8 inches in uncompacted thickness Before compaction begins, the fill should be brought to a water content that will permit proper compaction by either (1) aerating the fill if it is too wet, or (2) moistening the fill with water if it is too dry Each lift should be thoroughly mixed before compaction to ensure a uniform distribution of moisture No uncontrolled fill soils should remain on the site after completion of the site work In the event that temporary ramps or pads are constructed of uncontrolled fill soils, the loose fill soils should be removed and/or recompacted prior to completion of the grading operation 7 Trench and Retaining Wall Backfill All backfill soils placed in utility trenches or behind retaining walls should be compacted to at least 90 percent of Maximum Dry Density Our experience has shown that even shallow, nanow trenches (such as for irrigation and electrical lines) that are not properly I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Burrows Residence Additions Job No 06-9157 Carlsbad, California Page 13 compacted, can result in problems, particularly with respect to shallow groundwater accumulation and migration Backfill soils placed behind retaining walls and/or crawl space retaining walls should be installed as early as the retaining walls are capable of supporting lateral loads B Design Parameters for Proposed Foundations 8 Footings We recommend that the proposed single-story additions be supported on conventional, individual-spread and/or continuous fooling foundations bearing on undisturbed formational materials and/or well- compacted fill material All footings should be founded at least 18 inches below the lowest adjacent finished grade Footings located adjacent to utility trenches should have their bearing surfaces situated below an imaginary 1510 plane projected upward from the bottom edge of the adjacent utility trench At the recommended depths, footings may be designed for allowable beai ing pressures of 2,000 pounds per square foot (psf) for combined dead and live loads and 2,650 psf for all loads, including wind or seismic The footings should, however, have a minimum width of 12 inches 9 Foundation Reinforcement All continuous footings should contain top and bottom reinforcement to provide structural continuity and to permit spanning of local irregularities We recommend that a minimum of two No 4 top and two No 4 bottom reinforcing bars be provided in the footings A minimum clearance of 3 inches should be maintained between steel reinforcement and the bottom or sides of the footing Isolated square footings should contain, as a minimum, a grid of three No 4 steel bars on 12-inch centers, both ways In order for us to offer an opinion as to whether the footings are I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Burrows Residence Additions Carlsbad, California Job No 06-9157 Page 14 10 founded on soils of sufficient load bearing capacity, it is essential that our representative inspect the footing excavations prior to the placement of reinforcing steel or concrete NOTE The project Civil/Structural Engineer should review all reinforcing schedules The reinforcing minimums recommended herein are not to be construed as structural designs, but merely as minimum^ reinforcement to reduce the potential for cracking and separations ' I Existing foundation bearing on formational materials or properly compacted fill soil may be considered to possess an allowable 2,000 vertical beanng capacity The new footings and/or slabs should be tied with dowels to the existing footings Seismic Design Criteria Site-specific seismic design criteria to calculate the base shear needed for the design of the residential additions are presented in the following table The design criteria was obtained from the California Building Code (2001 edition) and is based on the distance to the closest active fault and soil profile classification The nearest active fault is approximately 6 miles from the site Parameter Seismic Zone Factor, Z Soil Profile Type Seismic Coefficient, Ca Seismic Coefficient, Cv Near-Source Factor, Na Near-Source Factor, Nv Seismic Source Type Value 040 Sc 0 40Na 0 56NV 1 0 1 02 B Reference Table 16-1 Table 16-J Table 16-Q Table 16-R Table 16-S Table 16-T Table 16-U II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Burrows Residence Additions Job No 06-9157 Carlsbad, California Page 15 11 Lateral Loads Lateral load resistance for the structure additions supported on footing foundations may be developed in friction between the foundation bottoms and the supporting subgrade An allowable friction coefficient of 0 40 is considered applicable An additional allowable passive resistance equal to an equivalent fluid weight of 275 pounds per cubic foot acting against the foundations may be used in design provided the footings are poured neat against the adjacent undisturbed formational terrace materials and/or compacted fill materials These lateral resistance values assume a level surface in front of the footing for a minimum distance of three times the embedment depth of the footing 12 Settlement Settlements under building loads are expected to be within tolerable limits for the proposed residence additions For footings designed in accordance with the recommendations presented in the preceding paragraphs, we anticipate that total settlements should not exceed 1 inch and that post-construction differential settlements should be less than 1/2-inch with a maximum angular rotation of 1/300 C Concrete Slab-on-grade Criteria 13 Minimum Floor Slab Reinforcement We recommend that all new slabs-on- grade contain at least a minimum amount of reinforcing steel to reduce the separation of cracks, should they occur 13 1 The slabs-on-grade should be a minimum of 4 inches actual thickness and be reinforced with No 3 bars on 18-inch centers, both ways, placed at midheight in the slab The slabs should be underlain by a 2- mch-thick layer of clean sand (S E =30 or greater) overlying a moisture retardant membrane over 2 inches of sand Slab subgrade I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I Burrows Residence Additions Job No OG-91'57 Carlsbad, California Page L6 soil should be verified by a Geotechnical Exploration, Inc representative to have the proper moisture content within 48 hours prior to placement of the vapor barrier and pouring of concrete 13 2 Following placement of concrete floor slabs, sufficient drying time must be allowed prior to placement of any floor coverings Premature placement of floor coverings may result in degradation of adhesive materials and loosening of the finish floor materials ' I 14 Concrete Isolation Joints We recommend the project Civil/Structural Engineer incorporate isolation joints and sawcuts to at least one-fourth Ihe thickness of the slab in any floor designs The joints and cuts, if properly placed, should reduce the potential for and help control floor slab cracking We recommend that concrete shrinkage joints be spaced no farther than approximately 20 feet apart, and also at re-entrant corners However, due to a number of reasons (such as base preparation, construction techniques, curing procedures, and normal shrinkage of concrete), some cracking of sldbs can be expected 15 Slab Moisture Emission Soil moisture vapor can result in damage to moisture-sensitive floors, some floor sealers, or sensitive equipment in direct contact with the floor, in addition to mold and staining on slabs, walls and carpets The common practice in Southern California is to place vapor retarders made of PVC, or of polyethylene PVC retarders are made in thickness ranging from 10- to 60-mil Polyethylene retarders, called visqueen, range from 5- to 10-mil in thickness The thicker the plastic, the stronger the resistance will be against puncturing I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I I I 1 I I Burrows Residence Additions Job No 06-9157 Carlsbad, California Page 17 Although polyethylene (visqueen) products are commonly used, products such as Vaporshield possess higher tensile strength and are more specifically designed for and intended to retard moisture transmission into conciete slabs The use of Vaporshield or equivalent is highly recommended when a structure is intended for moisture-sensitive floor coverings or uses 15 1 Vapor retarder joints must be lapped and sealed with mastic or the manufacturer's recommended tape To provide protection of the moisture retarder, a layer of at least 2 inches of clean sand on top and 2 inches at the bottom should also be provided No heavy equipment, stakes or other puncturing instruments should be used on top of the liner before or during concrete placement In actual practice, stakes are often driven through the retarder material, equipment is dragged or rolled across the retarder, overlapping or jointing is not properly implemented, etc All these construction deficiencies reduce the retarder's effectiveness 15 2 The vapor retarders are not waterproof They are intended to help prevent or reduce vapor transmission and capillary migration through the soil into the pores of concrete slabs Waterproofing systems must supplement vapor retarders if full waterproofing is desired The owner should be consulted to determine the specific level of protection required 16 Exterior Slab Reinforcement Exterior slabs should be at least 4 inches thick As a minimum for protection of on-site improvements, we recommend that all nonstructural concrete slabs (such as patios, sidewalks, etc ), be founded on properly compacted and tested fill or dense native formation dnd underlain by no more than 3 inches of clean leveling sand, with No 3 bars at I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Burrows Residence Additions Job No 06-9157 Carlsbad, California , Page 18 18-inch centers, both ways, at the center of the slab, and contain adequate isolation and control joints The performance of on-site improvements can be greatly affected by soil base preparation and the quality of construction It is therefore important that all improvements are properly designed and constructed for the existing soil conditions The improvements should not be built on loose soils or fills placed without our observation and testing i For exterior slabs with the minimum shrinkage reinforcement, control joints should be placed at spaces no farther than 15 feet apart or the width of the slab, whichever is less, and also at re-entrant corners Control joints in exterior slabs should be sealed with elastomenc joint sealant The sealant should be inspected every 6 months and be properly maintained D Slopes 17 Temporary Slopes No permanent slopes are planned for the addition areas of the site Where not superseded by specific recommendations presented in this report, trenches, excavations and temporary slopes at the subject site should be constructed in accordance with Title 8, Construction Safety Orders, issued by Cal-OSHA This office should be contacted for additional recommendations if additional shoring or steep temporary slopes are required E Retaining Wall Design Criteria 18 Design Parameters - Unrestrained The active earth pressure (to be utilized in the design of any cantilever retaining walls, utilizing imported, very low to low-expansive soils [El less than 50] as backfill) should be based on an Equivalent Fluid Weight of 35 pounds per cubic foot (for level backfill only) I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I 1 I Burrows Residence Additions Job No 06-9157 Carlsbad, California Page 19 19 Design Parameters - Restrained Retaining walls designed for a restrained condition should utilize a uniform pressure equal to 9xH (nine times the total height of retained soil, considered in pounds per square foot) considered as acting everywhere on the back of the wall in addition to the design Equivalent Fluid Weight The soil pressure produced by any footings, improvements, or any other surcharge placed within a horizontal distance equal to the height of the retaining portion of the wall should be included in the wall design pressure The recommended lateral soil pressures are based on the assumption that no loose soils or soil wedges will be retained by the retaining wall Backfill soils should consist of import low-expansive soils with El less than 50, and should be placed from the heel of the foundation to the ground surface within the wedge formed by a plane at 30° from vertical, cind passing by the heel of the foundation and the back face of the retaining wall 20 Surcharge Loads Any loads placed on the active wedge behind a cantilever wall should be included in the design by multiplying the load weight by a factor of 0 32 For a restrained wall, the lateral factor should be 0 52 21 Wall Drainage Proper subdrams and free-draining backwall material or board drains (such as J-dram or Miradram) should be installed behind all retaining walls (in addition to proper waterproofing) on the subject project Geotechnical Exploration, Inc will assume no liability for damage to structures or improvements that is attributable to poor drainage The architectural plans should clearly indicate that subdrams for any lower-level walls be placed at an elevation at least 1 foot below the bottom of the lower- level slabs At least 0 5-percent gradient should be provided to the subdram The subdram should be placed in an envelope of crushed rock gravel up to 1 inch in maximum diameter, and be wrapped with Mirafi 140N filter or equivalent 1 I I 1 1 I I I I I i I i I i l l I l Burrows Residence Additions Job No 06-9157 Carlsbad, California Page 20 F Site Drainage Considerations 22 Erosion Control Appropriate erosion control measures should be taken at all times during and after construction to prevent surface runoff waters from entering footing excavations, ponding on finished building pad areas or causing erosion on soil surface i 23 Surface Drainage Adequate measures should be taken to properly finish- grade the lot after the additions and other improvements are in place Drainage waters from this site and adjacent properties should be directed away from the footings, floor slabs, and slopes, onto the natural drainage direction for this area or into properly designed and approved drainage facilities Roof gutters and downspouts should be installed on the structure, with the runoff directed away from the foundations via closed drainage lines Proper subsurface and surface drainage will help minimize the potential for waters to seek the level of the bearing soils under the footings and floor slabs Failure to observe this recommendation could result in undermining and possible differential movement of the structure or other improvements on the site or cause other moisture-related problems Currently, the Uniform Building Code requires a minimum 2-percent surface gradient for proper drainage of building pads unless waived by the building official Concrete pavement may have a minimum gradient of 0 5-percent 24 Planter Drainage Planter areas, flower beds and planter boxes should be sloped to dram away from the footings and floor slabs at a gradient of at least 5 percent within 5 feet from the perimeter walls Any planter areas adjacent to the residence or surrounded by concrete improvements should be provided with sufficient area drains to help with rapid runoff disposal No I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Burrows Residence Additions Job No 06-9] 57 Carlsbad, California Page 21 water should be allowed to pond adjacent to the residence or other improvements or anywhere on the site G General Recommendations 25 Project Start Up Notification In order to minimize any work delays during site development, this firm should be contacted 48 hours prior to any need for observation of footing excavations or field density testing of compacted fill soils If possible, placement of formwork and steel reinforcement in footing excavations should not occur prior to observing the excavations, in the event that our observations reveal the need for deepening or redesigning foundation structures at any locations, any formwork or steel reinforcement in the affected footing excavation areas would have to be removed prior to correction of the observed problem (i e , deepening the footing excavation, recompactmg soil in the bottom of the excavation, etc ) IX GRADING NOTES Geotechnical Exploration, Inc recommends that we be retained to verify the actual soil conditions revealed during site grading work and footing excavation to be as anticipated in this "Report of Limited Geotechnical Investigation" for the project In addition, the compaction of any fill soils placed during site grading work must be observed and tested by the soil engineer It is the responsibility of the grading contractor to comply with the requirements on the grading plans and the local grading ordinance All retaining wall and trench backfill should be properly compacted Geotechnical Exploration, Inc will assume no liability for damage occurring due to improperly or uncompacted backfill placed without our observations and testing I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I Burrows Residence Additions Job No 06-9157 Carlsbad, California Page 22 X LIMITATIONS Our conclusions and recommendations have been based on available data obtained from our field investigation and laboratory analysis, as well as our experience with similar soils and formational materials located in this area of Carlsbad Of necessity, we must assume a certain degree of continuity between exploratory excavations and/or natural exposures It is, therefore, necessary that all observations, conclusions, and recommendations be verified at the time grading i operations begin or when footing excavations are placed In the event discrepancies are noted, additional recommendations may be issued, if required The work performed and recommendations presented herein are the result of an investigation and analysis that meet the contemporary standard of care in our profession within the County of San Diego No warranty is provided This report should be considered valid for a period of two (2) years, and is subject to review by our firm following that time If significant modifications are made to the building plans, especially with respect to the height and location of any proposed structures, this report must be presented to us for immediate review and possible revision It is the responsibility of the owner and/or developer to ensure that the recommendations summarized in this report are carried out in the field operations and that our recommendations for design of this project are incorporated in the structural plans We should be retained to review the project plans once they are available, to see that our recommendations are adequately incorporated in the plans This firm does not practice or consult in the field of safety engineering We do not direct the contractor's operations, and we cannot be responsible for the safety of I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Burrows Residence Additions Carlsbad, California Job No 06-9157 Page 23 personnel other than our own on the site, the safety of others is the responsibility of the contractor The contractor should notify the owner if he considered any of the recommended actions presented herein to be unsafe The firm of Geotechnical Exploration, Inc shall not be held responsible for changes to the physical condition of the property, such as addition of fill soils or changing drainage patterns, which occur subsequent to issuance of this report and the changes are made without our observations, testing, and approval Once again, should any questions arise concerning this report, please feel free to contact the undersigned Reference to our Job No 06-9157 will expedite a reply to your inquiries Respectfully submitted, GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION, INC Jay K Heiser Senior Project Geologist Jaime A Cerros, P E R C E 34422/G E 2007 Senior Geotechnical Engineer . .^- -^-^ teslie D Reed, President C E G 999[exp 3 31 07]/R G 3391 VICINITY MAP =^^r^7>^4 °, 3 i 36 /0* % ^*-,<vw: <= vr^iA feTr j u Thomas Bros _„__ i._| , ,— -0, -r „ I / v. ** " ^.jL-a. ; Guide San Diego County pg 1127 Burrows Residence Additions 2070 Caleta Court Carlsbad, CA Figure No I Job No 06-9157 LEGEND ASSUMED PROPERTY BOUNDARY PROPOSED STRUCTURE EXISTING STRUCTURE HP 5 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY HANDPIT NOTE This Plot Plan is not to be used for legal purposes Locations and dimensions are approxi- mate Actual property dimensions and locations of utilities may be obtained from the Approved Building Plans or the As—Built Grading Plans PLOT PLAN Burrows Residence Additions 2070 Caleta Court Carlsbad CA Figure No II Job No 059157 MIC >6 05 9157p April 2006 '"EQUIPMENT Hand Tools SURFACE ELEVATION ±80 Mean Sea Level DIMENSION & TYPE OF EXCAVATION 3X3X3 Handpit GROUNDWATER/ SEEPAGE DEPTH Not Encountered DATE LOGGED ^ 3-6-06 LOGGED BY JKH JE o 1 - - 2- 4- i1 - . &^\. _\_/ &$i :! ^/ : ,// 1% •l/l/i/ /A$'- *Y \ i K •1 FIELD DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION DESCRIPTION AND REMARKS (Gram size Density Moisture Color) SILTY SAND fine-grained with abundant roots Loose Moist Dark brown LANDSCAPE TOPSOIL (Qaf) CLAYEY SAND with some roots Loose to medium dense Moist Tan-brown and gray green FILL (Qaf) CLAYEY SILT with some caliche and siltstone fragments Firm to stiff Damp Tan brown and gray green DEL MAR FORMATION (Td) 53% passing #200 sieve Bottom @ 3 COoto SM SC ML CL g z § 195 Ig ^ LU 1069 g piQ. Oo s 11 1 s ^II < LU5 o 1232 Q ll 87 s z ° £2 & 8 QM IMpEXCO 1 38 i— llco o Q — 1 LU ll I PERCHED WATER TABLE Kl LOOSE BAG SAMPLE H IN PLACE SAMPLE • MODIFIED CALIFORNIA SAMPLE GO FIELD DENSITY TEST ^ STANDARD PENETRATION TESTv^ JOB NAME Burrows Residence Additions SITE LOCATION 2070 Caleta Court, Carlsbad, CA JOB NUMBER 06 9157 FIGURE NUMBER Ilia REVIEWEDBY L[)R/JAC llrl&JI Geotechnleal Tjt- E*P|oratton lne LOG No HP-1 j ^EQUIPMENT Hand Tools SURFACE ELEVATION ± 81 Mean Sea Level DIMENSION 8 TYPE OF EXCAVATION 3X3X25 Handpit GROUNDWATER/ SEEPAGE DEPTH Not Encountered DATE LOGGED ^ 3-6=06 LOGGED BY JKH h-LJ_ fc Q _ - 1 - - 2 _ _ o — 4-SYMBOLu w - I- ^-'f ^ x. , -^ fij 'IjLL I SAMPLE_ •1 FIELD DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION DESCRIPTION AM) REMARKS (Gram size Density Moisture Color) SILTY SAND fine- to medium-grained with some roots Loose to medium dense Damp Dark brown LANDSCAPE TOPSOIL (Qaf) CLAYEY SAND, with some roots and siltstone fragments Medium dense Moist Tan-brown and gray green FILL (Qaf) CLAYEY SILT with some caliche and siltstone fragments Stiff Damp Dark gray-green and brown A DEL MAR FORMATION (Td) f Bottom @ 2 5 CO O CO SM SC ML -e uj re g| 149 is 3:Q 1082 s£ 3 Z5 £§ 0 S >- s ^ S D Q >- Q li £ t Q Z. 65 o H- 11m o Q Om IS PERCHED WATER TABLE IEI LOOSE BAG SAMPLE H IN PLACE SAMPLE • MODIFIED CALIFORNIA SAMPLE [U FIELD DENSITY TEST ^ STANDARD PENETRATION TEST JOB NAME Burrows Residence Additions SITE LOCATION 2070 Caleta Court Carlsbad CA JOB NUMBER 06-9157 FIGURE NUMBER Illb LDR/JAC LOG No HP-2 ^EQUIPMENT Hand Tools SURFACE ELEVATION ± 79 Mean Sea Level DIMENSION & TYPE OF EXCAVATION 2X2X25 Handpit GROUNDWATER/ SEEPAGE DEPTH 2 feet DATE LOGGED ^ 3-6-06 LOGGED BY JKH Q_UJ Q " 1 - - 3- - 4-SYMBOL- %3> ll ^o-b ^9 V4 ^I'll' I I I I !•! I>!'!.liiiL SAMPLE• FIELD DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION DESCRIPTION AND REMARKS (Grain size Density Moisture Color) SILTY SAND with some roots Loose Damp Dark brown LANDSCAPE TOPSOIL (Qaf) SILTY SAND fine to medium-grained with some rock fragments Loose to medium dense Very moist to wet Tan-gray and brown FILL/ WEATHERED DEL MAR FORMATION (Qaf/Td) — seepage on contact SILTY SAND fine- to medium-grained with some caliche and siltstone fragments Medium dense Moist Tan-gray and brown A DEL MAR FORMATION (Td) /- Bottom @ 2 5 CO o CO SM SM SM -e LU 148 1089 E II Isz> £: *t u i S 0 Q £ i 8 &8 i_ 11CD O O 11 I PERCHED WATER TABLE IE) LOOSE BAG SAMPLE [T] IN PLACE SAMPLE • MODIFIED CALIFORNIA SAMPLE [s] FIELD DENSITY TEST ^ STANDARD PENETRATION TEST\^ JOB NAME Burrows Residence Additions SITE LOCATION 2070 Caleta Court Carlsbad CA JOB NUMBER 06 9157 RGURE NUMBER Ille I™IEDBY LDR/JAC Ilv4&£ Geotedmteal W^^ exploration, hie LOG No HP-3 J EQUIPMENT Hand Tools SURFACE ELEVATION ± 79 Mean Sea Level DIMENSION 8 TYPE OF EXCAVATION 2X2X25 Handpit GROUNDWATER/ SEEPAGE DEPTH 2 feet DATE LOGGED ^ 3-6-06 LOGGED BY JKH DEPTH FT- 1 - - 2 - 3 - - 4-SYMBOLA£*> t~*' MX X y ->.' i. ~jrrr • !' , j| . tfi. i Q_ ' FIELD DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION DESCRIPTION AND REMARKS (Gram size Density Moisture Color) SILTY SAND fine- to medium-grained with abundant roots and some gravel Loose Moist Dark brown FILL (Qaf) - mostly 3/4 gravel to 1 SILTY SAND fine- to medium-grained Loose to medium dense Very moist to wet Tan-gray and brown DEL MAR FORMATION (Td) Footing Depth 24 inches — seepage at 2 — becomes medium dense and probes ~6 to 12 Bottom @ 2 5 0) o en SM SM IN PLACE IMOISTURE (%)192 IN PLACE DRYDENSITY (pcf)1039 OPTIMUMMOISTURE (%)MAXIMUM DRYDENSITY (pcf)DENSITY I(%ofMDD)« 1x oLu o BLOW ICOUNTS/FTD O UJCO _JUJ 0-31 S O ?f_ PERCHED WATER TABLE Kl LOOSE BAG SAMPLE H IN-PLACE SAMPLE • MODIFIED CALIFORNIA SAMPLE GO FIELD DENSITY TEST H STANDARD PENETRATION TEST V JOB NAME Burrows Residence Additions SITE LOCATION 2070 Caleta Court Carlsbad CA JOB NUMBER 06-9157 FIGURE NUMBER Hid REVIEWEDBY LDR/JAC Uall^S Geotecruricai J3, B|Pterallon' l(le LOG No HP-4 j ^EQUIPMENT Hand Tools SURFACE ELEVATION ± 79 Mean Sea Level DIMENSION 8 TYPE OF EXCAVATION 2X3X4 Handpit GROUNDWATER/ SEEPAGE DEPTH Not Encountered DATE LOGGED ^ 3-606 LOGGED BY JKH i- LJ_ X(— o 1 - - ~ 2- - - - 3- - ~ _ — - 5- i CO ~« V ^ V <% V V V AC- X /" 4 ^ W "J '"- •f, r" TTTTT IH't,'i ! f fl , M HJ'l- 4: j ) ,1 SAMPLEFIELD DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION DESCRIPTION AND REMARKS (Gram size Density Moisture Color) CLAYEY SAND fine- to medium-grained with abundant roots Loose to medium dense Damp Tan brown FILL (Oaf) Footing Depth 24 inches — encountered 4 inch diameter flexible dram pipe at 2 CLAYEY SILT with some siltstone fragments Firm Moist Dark gray-brown A FILL (Qaf) r SILTY SAND fine to medium-grained Medium dense Damp Tan-gray DEL MAR FORMATION (Td) Bottom @ 4 CO o CO sc ML CMOIVI LU LLJ TY 11 LU s_ ^LU ll il ll9 & S Q Q II £ 1 rf W % °LU O t lim o Q LUCO"_1UJii i PERCHED WATER TABLE K| LOOSE BAG SAMPLE H IN PLACE SAMPLE • MODIFIED CALIFORNIA SAMPLE GO FIELD DENSITY TEST H STANDARD PENETRATION TESTV JOB NAME Burrows Residence Additions SITE LOCATION 2070 Caleta Court Carlsbad CA JOB NUMBER 06-9157 FIGURE NUMBER Hie K*"™* LDR/JAC lw4&JK Geotedmlcaf T3- E«Ploralton"' lwe LOG No HP-5 j 3URROWS GPJ GEI FEB06 GOT 5/9/06K o> UJs 135 ^ on. 4Ofi125 120 I A AC115 A An f- •g Q. V ~ i -me;g 105 >- ._ K ^ An an on RK. Rft, 75 VA V4 i 4 V-\ £ ^ V 4 V\ \ \ \ L ^ ^A \4 k 4 V\\ '&. l_ A ,* I At \ \\ T , \ L 7- \ \*4X4 S ^\\ \\ t V i \k y*v c C 1 \ I ^ \ y $01 )e: 'ei v\ \ \ \^ jrce of Matenal scnption of Mate ,t Method V\ \ \ V. \ ^ ^ \ N \ Ls \ V, ^ \ \ V\ S\ \ HP 1 (o> 1 5 nal Tan brown CLAYEY SILT (ML-CL) ASTM D1557 Method A TEST RESUU Maximum Dry Densi Optimum Water Cor Expansion Index (El \ \ \ V Curves of 1 0 \ for Specific C X-\ >\ v\\ XAA S N S.^SA^ x^, ^ v^^.N^vS >\.\\ ^ rs ty 1232 PCF tent 11 1 % ) 38 0% Saturation Gravity Equal to 280 270 260 V \X \X ^ \_1 \^Jbv ^^X\^Xh \^Vx^Js.s^3K^XJ_ v.3\^ 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 WATER CONTENT ^ |[v4cHU Geotechnical JT Exploration, Inc MOISTURE-DENSITY RELATIONSHIP Figure Number IV Job Name Burrows Residence Additions Site Location 2070 Caleta Court Carlsbad CA Job Number 069157 9 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I APPENDIX A UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART SOIL DESCRIPTION Coarse-grained (More than half of material is larger than a No 200 sieve) GRAVELS CLEAN GRAVELS (More than half of coarse fraction is larger than No 4 sieve size but smaller than 3) GRAVELS WITH FINES (Appreciable amount) SANDS CLEAN SANDS (More than half of coarse fraction is smaller than a No 4 sieve) SANDS WITH FINES (Appreciable amount) GW Well graded gravels gravel and sand mixtures little or no fines GP Poorly graded gravels gravel and sand mixtures little or no fines GC Clay gravels poorly graded gravel sand silt mixtures SW Well-graded sand gravelly sands little or no fines SP Poorly graded sands gravelly sands little or no fines SM Silty sands poorly graded sand and silty mixtures SC Clayey sands poorly graded sand and clay mixtures Fine-grained (More than half of material is smaller than a No 200 sieve) SILTS AND CLAYS Liquid Limit Less than 50 Liquid Limit Greater than 50 HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS (rev 6/05) ML Inorganic silts and very fine sands rock flour sandy silt and clayey silt sand mixtures with a slight plasticity CL Inorganic clays of low to medium plasticity gravelly clays silty clays clean clays OL Organic silts and organic silty clays of low plasticity MH Inorganic silts micaceous or diatomaceous fine sandy or silty soils elastic silts CH Inorganic clays of high plasticity fat clays OH Organic clays of medium to high plasticity PT Peat and other highly organic soils City of Carlsbad • uilding Department CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE PAYMENT OF SCHOOL FEES OR OTHER MITIGATION This form must be completed by the City the applicant and the appropriate school districts and returned to the City prior to issuing a building permit The City will not issue any building permit without a completed school fee form Project Name Building Permit Plan Check Number Project Address APN Project Applicant (Owner Name) Project Description Building Type Residential Second Dwelling Unit BURROWS RESIDENCE CB063094 2070 CALETA CT 215-110-19-00 RICH AND LAUREL BURROWS RESIDENTIAL ADDITION V-N New Dwelling Units Square Feet of Living Area in New Dwelling Square Feet of Living Area in SOU Residential Additions 1497 Net Square Feet New Area Commercial/Industrial City Certification of Applicant Information JSquare Feet Floor Area Date -SCH DISTRICTS WITHIN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD Jarlsbad Unified School Distnp 6225 El Cammo Real Carlsbad CA 92009 Q3J-5000) Vista Unified School District 1234 Arcadia Drive Vista CA 92083 (7262170) San Marcos Unified School District 215MataWay San Marcos CA 92069 (290 2o49) Contact Nancy Dolce (By Appt Only) Encmitas Union School District 101 South Rancho Santa Fe Rd Encmitas CA 92024 (944 4300 ext 166) San Dieguito Union High School District 710 Encmitas Blvd Encmitas CA 92024 (753 6491) Certification of Applicant/Owners The person executing this declaration ( Owner1) certifies under penalty of perjury that (1) the information provided above is correct and true to the best of the Owners knowledge and that the Owner will file an amended certification of payment and pay the pojditional fee if Owner requests an increase in the number of dwelling units or square d or if the initial determination of units or square footage is found to be incorrect and ier of the above described project(s) or that the person executing this declaration is footage after the that (2) the Own authorized to sigr Signature ermit is iss >wVier/devel|( of the Own i AT Revised 3/30/2006 Date SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL FEE CERTIFICATION (To be completed by the school distnct(s)) k**************************************^ THIS FORM INDICATES THAT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROJECT HAVE BEEN OR WILL BE SATISFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT The undersigned being duly authorized by the applicable School District certifies that the developer, builder or owner has satisfied the obligation for school facilities This is to certify that the applicant listed on page 1 has paid all amounts or completed other applicable school mitigation determined by the School District The City may issue building permits for this project SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICIAL TITLE NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT Q^RlSBAS|PM^SC^OOlI>ISTRICr fl?2S ELCAM1NQ REAl\UMW W^M» IWJMJfc *\F 'vUiill Cji DATE CARLSBAD,a 92009 PHONE NUMBER Revised 3/30/2006 03-28^2007 City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad CA 92008 Plan Check Revision Permit No PCR07051 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 Job Address Permit Type Parcel No Valuation Reference # Project Title Applicant SCOTT SPENCER 7527 GIRARD AVE LA JOLLA CA 92037 858 459 8901 2070 CALETA CT CBAD PCR 2151101900 Lot# $0 00 Construction Type CB063094 BURROWS REVISE COURTYARD & WINDOWS C D E & F VN Status Applied Entered By Plan Approved Issued Inspect Area Owner BURROWS FAMILY TRUST 10 16 06 2070 CALETA CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 ISSUED 03/06/2007 JMA 03/28/2007 03/28/2007 Plan Check Revision Fee Additional Fees $300 00 $000 Total Fees $300 00 Total Payments To Date $300 00 Balance Due $000 Inspector FINAL APPROVAL Date Clearance NOTICE Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the Imposition of fees dedications reservations or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as fees/exactions You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions If you protest them you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a) and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3 32 030 Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack review set aside void or annul their imposition You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity changes nor planning zoning grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired '\ PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Ave Carlsbad CA 92008 PROJECT INFORMATION FOR OFFICE USE ONLY PLAN CHECK NO EST VAL Plan Ck Deposit _ Validated By \J Date f? -SI Address (include Bldg/Suite #)Business Name (at this address) Legal Description Lot No Subdivision Name/Number Unit No Phase No 1 otal # of units escription of Work &?fPl CONTACT PERSQNJplffweni from applican Name (Ppr APPLICANT Q CoSrlctoT Address Agent for Contractor P Owner City gent for dwrwfr State/Zip Telephone # Ea* # Name Address City State/Zip Telephone tt PROPEHTf OWNER Name Address City State/Zip Telephone # COMPANY NAME (Sec 7031 5 Business and Professions Code Any City or County which requires a permit to construct alter improve demolish or repair any structure prior to its issuance also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor s License Law [Chapter 9 commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code] or that he is exempt therefrom and the basi for the alleged exemption Any violation of Section 7031 5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars [$500]) Name State License # Address License Class City State/Zip City Business License # Telephone # Designer Name State License # 6 WORKERS CQMPENS'A'TtQNtf*' ""Tj Address City State/Zip Telephone * IIP* Sk, Workers Compensation Declaration I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations n I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self insure for workers compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued l~l I have and will maintain workers compensation as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code for the performance of the work for whic h this permit is issued My worker s compensation insurance carrier and policy number are Insurance Company Policy No Expiration Date (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS [$100] OR LESS) l~l CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers Compensation Laws of California WARNING Failure to secure workers compensation coverage is unlawful and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100 000) in addition to the cost of compensation damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code interest and attorney s fees SIGNATURE DATE 7 OWNER BUILDEfJOECLARATlQN I "KL I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor s License Law for the following reason 1~1 I as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec 7044 Business and Professions Code The Contractor s License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon and who does such work himself or through his own employees provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale If however the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion the owner builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale) (~| I as owner of the property am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec 7044 Business and Professions Code The Contractors License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon and contracts for such projects with contrictor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor s License Law) [H I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason 1 I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement l~l YES l~lNO 2 I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work 3 I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractor license number) 4 I plan to provide portions of the work but I have hired the following person to coordinate supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number) 5 I will provide some of the work but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type of work) PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE DATE COMPLETE THIS SECTION FOR A/0^/?fBffi£W7Mi BUILDINC3 PERMITS ONLY wt <f 4% * - ^ •»* j^ i\ Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505 25533 or 25534 of the Presley Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? l~l YES l~l NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? O YES f"l NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1 000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? f~l YES (~| NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec 30970) Civil Code) LENDER S NAME LENDER S ADDRESS I certify that I have read the applit City ordinances and State laws n property for inspection pui JUDGMENTS COSTS AND EXi OSHA An OSHA permit is required for EXPIRATION Every permit issue (Uthonzed by such permit is not any time after the work is comi APPLICANT S SIGNATURE re information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate I agree to comply with all I hereby authorize representatives of the CitV of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES Y ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT leep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height ir the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work |e date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspendod or abandoned ' io^ 1Q6 4 4 Uniform Building Code) DATE YELLOW Applicant PINK Finance EsGil Corporation *** In (Partnership -with government for (Building Safety DATE March 14, 2OO7 a APPLICANT JURISDICTION Carlsbad ~£ V-^ QPLAN REVIEW E R FILE PLAN CHECK NO 063094 PROJECT ADDRESS 2070 Caleta Court PROJECT NAME Rev to SFD Addition/Remodel for Burrows XI The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction s building codes The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction s building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck The check list transmitted herewith is for your information The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck The applicant s copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person The applicant s copy of the check list has been sent to XI Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed Person contacted Telephone # Date contacted (by ) Fax # Mail Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS By Bert Domingo Enclosures Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC 3/8/07 trnsmtldot 9320 Chesapeake Drive Suite 208 4 San Diego California 92123 + (858)560 1468 4 Fax (858) 560 1576 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION Carlsbad PREPARED BY Bert Dommgo BUILDING ADDRESS 2070 Caleta Court PLAN CHECK NO 063094 DATE March 14, 2O07 BUILDING OCCUPANCY R3 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION VN BUILDING PORTION Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE Jurisdiction Code AREA ( Sq Ft ) cb Valuation Multiplier By Ordinance Reg Mod VALUE ($) Bldg Permit Fee by Ordinance Plan Check Fee by Ordinance $30000 Type of Review I I Repetitive Fee Repeats Complete Review D Other m Hourly Structural Only 2 5 Hours * Esgil Plan Review Fee $240 00 Based on hourly rate Comments Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue doc PLANNING/ENGINEERING APPROVALS PERMIT NUMBER ADDRESS DATE TENANT IMPROVEMENT •SfDENTIAL ADDITION MINOR PLAZA CAMINO REAL (<$10,000 00) CARLSBAD COMPANY STORES POOL / SPA RETAINING WALL VILLAGE FAIRE COMPLETE OFFICE BUILDING OTHER PLANNER ENGINEER 3 HAH DATE GOTTRELL ENGINEERING Consulting Structural Engineers STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS FOR Burrows' Residence Addition 2070 Caleta Court Carlsbad, CA 92009 Revisions Date March 5,2007 Job No 0603 D927 Gimmito De I i Ti/ i San Die£o CA 92120 (619) 287 9124 Fax (619) 287 9125 cottrellen£mecnn£<®cox net 7 T *? VI Multi Loaded Beamf2001 California Buildmq Code (97 NDS) 1 Ver 7 01 10 By Tom Cottrell Cottrell Engineering on 03 02 2007 1 31 59 PM Proiect 0603 BURROWS RES Location rb4 rev Summary 35INx725INx100FT(2 + 4 + 4)/#2 Douqlas Fir Larch Dry Use Section Adequate By 202 2% Controlling Factor Area / Depth Required 3 4 In Left Cantilever Deflections Dead Load OLD Left= 001 IN Live Load LLD Left= 0 01 IN = 2L/3632 Total Load TLD Left= 002 IN = 2L/2319 Center Span Deflections Dead Load OLD Center= 0 00 IN Live Load LLD Center= 000 IN = L/11509 Total Load TLD Center= 000 IN = L/10577 Right Span Deflections Dead Load OLD Riqht= 0 00 IN Live Load LLD Riqht= 0 00 IN = L/10252 Total Load TLD Right= 0 01 IN = L/5896 Center Span Left End Reactions (Support A) Live Load LL Rxn A= 744 LB Dead Load DL Rxn A= 794 LB Total Load TL Rxn A= 1538 LB Bearmq Lenqth Required (Beam only support capacity not checked) BL A= 0 70 IN Center Span Riqht End Reactions (Support B) Live Load LL Rxn B= 850 LB Dead Load DL Rxn B= 818 LB Total Load TL Rxn B= 1668 LB Bearmq Lenqth Required (Beam only support capacity not checked) BL B= 0 76 IN Right End Reactions (Support C) Live Load LL Rxn C= 319 LB Dead Load DL Rxn C= 313 LB Total Load TL Rxn C= 632 LB Bearmq Lenqth Required (Beam only support capacity not checked) BL C= 0 29 IN Dead Load Uplift F S FS= 1 5 Beam Data Left Cantilever Lenqth L1= 2 0 FT Left Cantilever Unbraced Lenqth Top of Beam Lu1 Top= 00 FT Left Cantilever Unbraced Length Bottom of Beam Lu1 Bottom= 20 FT Center Span Lenqth L2= 40 FT Center Span Unbraced Lenqth Top of Beam Lu2 Top= 00 FT Center Span Unbraced Length Bottom of Beam Lu2 Bottom= 40 FT Riqht Span Lenqth L3= 40 FT Riqht Span Unbraced Lenqth Top of Beam Lu3 Top= 00 FT Riqht Span Unbraced Length Bottom of Beam Lu3 Bottom= 40 FT Live Load Duration Factor Cd= 1 25 Live Load Deflect Criteria U 360 Total Load Deflect Criteria L/ 240 Left Cantilever Loading Uniform Load Live Load wL 1= 170 PLF Dead Load wD 1= 187 PLF Beam Self Weight BSW= 6 PLF Total Load wT 1= 363 PLF Center Span Loading Uniform Load Live Load wL 2= 170 PLF Dead Load wD 2= 187 PLF Beam Self Weight BSW= 6 PLF Total Load wT 2= 363 PLF Riqht Span Loading Uniform Load Live Load wL 3= 170 PLF Dead Load wD 3= 187 PLF Beam Self Weight BSW= 6 PLF Total Load wT 3= 363 PLF Properties For #2 Douqlas Fir Larch Bendmq Stress Fb= 900 PSI Shear Stress Fv= 95 PSI Modulus of Elasticity E= 1600000 PSI Stress Perpendicular to Gram Fc_perp= 625 PSI Adjusted Properties Fb (Compression Face in Tension) Fb= 1452 PSI Adjustment Factors Cd=1 25 Cl=0 99 CF=1 30 Fv Fv= 119 PSI Adjustment Factors Cd=1 25 Design Requirements Controlling Moment M= 725 FT LB Page 2 Multi Loaded Beamf 2001 California Building Code (97 NDS) I Ver 7 01 10 By Tom Cottrell Cottrell Engineering on 03 02 2007 1 31 59 PM Project 0603 BURROWS RES Location rb4 rev Over left support of span 2 (Center Span) Critical moment created by combining all dead loads and live loads on span(s) 1 2 3 Controlling Shear V= 665 LB At a distance d from left support of span 3 (Right Span) Critical shear created bv combining all dead loads and live loads on span(s) 2 3 Comparisons With Reguired Sections Section Modulus (Moment) Sreq= 5 99 INS S= 30 66 INS Area (Shear) Areg= 8 40 IN2 A= 25 38 IN2 Moment of Inertia (Deflection) lreg= 1150 IN4 l= 111 15 IN4 Multi Loaded Beam[ 2001 California Building Code (97 NDS) ] Ver 7 01 10 By Tom Cottrell Cottrell Engineering on 03 02 2007 Project 0603 BURROWS RES Location rb4 rev Summary 35INx725INx100FT(2 + 4 + 4)/#2 Douglas Fir Larch Dry Use _ Section Adequate By 202 2% Controlling Factor Area / Depth Required 3 4 In LOADING DIAGRAM -W Left Cantilever A = 2ft ~ A B Center Span = 4ft Right Span ~ JL C = 4ft Reactions Live Load A 744 Lb B 850 Lb C 319 Lb Left Cantilever Dead Load Total Load Uplift Load 794 Lb 1538Lb 0 Lb 818 Lb 1668 Lb 0 Lb 313Lb 632 Lb 0 Lb Uniform Loading Live Load Dead Load Self Weight Total Load W 170Plf 187Plf 6Plf 363 Plf Center Span Uniform Loading Live Load Dead Load Self Weight Total Load W 170 Plf 187 Plf 6 Plf 363 Plf Right Span Uniform Loading Live Load Dead Load Self Weight Total Load W 170 Plf 187 Plf 6 Plf 363 Plf Title Dsgnr Description Job# Date 1049AM 24 JAN 07 Scope Re 580018 Use KW 0605766 Ve 580 1 Dec 2003 ( )1983 2003 ENERCALCE g g Softwa Cantilevered Retaining Wall Design Code Ref ACI 318 02 1997 UBC 2003 IBC 2003 NFPA 5000 1 I 0603 b Page w es cwCalc I t Description RW275ft Criteria Soil Data Retained Height ~ 275ft Wall height above soil = 0 50 ft Slope Behind Wall = 0 00 1 Height of Soil over Toe = 6 00 in Soil Density = HOOOpcf Wind on Stem = 0 0 psf Allow Soil Bearing = 2 000 0 psf Equivalent Fluid Pressure Method Axial Load Applied to Stem Total Bearing Load resultant ecc Soil Pressure @ Toe Soil Pressure @ Heel Allowable Soil Pressure Less Than Allowable ACI Factored @ Toe ACI Factored @ Heel Footing Shear @ Toe = Footing Shear @ Heel = Allowable = Wall Stability Ratios Overturning = Sliding = Sliding Calcs Slab Resists All Sliding ' Lateral Sliding Force = 246 1 Ibs 246 N/A OK Footing Design Results— •-•- • ~ Footing Strengths & Dimensions "W^-i*L , Heel Active Pressure Toe Active Pressure Passive Pressure Water height over heel Footmg||Soil Friction Soil height to ignore for passive pressure Axial Dead Load Axial Live Load 35 0 psf/ft 35 0 psf/ft 275 0 psf/ft 00ft = 0400 000 in 1500 Ibs 40 0 Ibs f c = 2 500 psi Mm As /o = Toe Width Heel Width Total Footing Width = Footing Thickness = Key Width Key Depth = Key Distance from Toe = Cover @ Top = 3 00 in Axial Load Eccentricity = 60 000 psi 00014 050ft 1 00 T50 1200m 000 in 000 in 050ft ! Btm = 3 00 in 00 in Stem Construction Top Stem 1 117 psf OK 81 psf OK 2 000 psf / 1 459 psf 105 psf 0 0 psi OK 4 2 psi OK 85 0 psi Design height Wall Material Above Ht S Thickness Rebar Size Rebar Spacing Rebar Placed at « •» «U6Siyn U313 fb/FB + fa/Fa Total Force @ Section Moment Actual Moment Allowable Shear Actual Shear Allowable Bar Develop ABOVE Ht ft = = = = = = = lbs = ft-# = = psi = psi = m = Bar Lap/Hook BELOW Ht m = Wall Weight Rebar Depth d Masonry Data fm Fs = m = psi = psi = Stem OK 000 Concrete 600 # 4 1800 Center 0120 2175 2050 1 7056 60 850 1872 600 725 300 Factored Pressure Mu Upward Mu Downward Mu Design Actual 1 Way Shear Allow 1 Way Shear Toe Reinforcing Heel Reinforcing Key Reinforcing Toe 1 459 164 36 128 000 8500 = None Speed ' = None Speed ' = None Speed' Heel 105 psf 0 ft-# 137 ft-# 137ft-# 4 25 psi 85 00 psi Solid Grouting = Special Inspection = Modular Ratio n = Short Term Factor = Equiv Solid Thick = Masonry Block Type = Normal Weight Concrete Data — - — f c psi = 2 500 0 Fy .. BSL= 60 000 0 <^~'— ' ~\Dther Acceptable Sizes & Spacmgs \ Toe Not reqd Mu < S Fr Heel Not req d Mu < S Fr \Key No key defined R 580018 U er KW-0605766 V 5 8 0 1 De 2003 ( )1983 2003 ENERCALC E g rngSoftwae Title Dsgnr Description Jok# Date 1049AM 24 JAN 07 Scope Code Ref ACI 318 02 1997 UBC 2003 IBC 2003 NFPA 5000 Cantilevered Retaining Wall Design 0603b Description RW 2 75ft ; & Moments Item Heel Active Pressure = Toe Active Pressure = Surcharge Over Toe Adjacent Footing Load = Added Lateral Load = Load @ Stem Above Soil = SeismicLoad = Force Jbs 2461 OVERTURNING Distance ft 125 Moment ft-# 307 6 Soil Over Heel RESISTING Force Distance Moment Ibs ft ft-# 1513 12: 1891 Total = 2461 OTM = 3076 Resisting/Overturning Ratio = 2 46 Vertical Loads used for Soil Pressure = 898 0 Ibs Vertical component of active pressure used for soil pressure Sloped Soil Over Heel = Surcharge Over Heel = Adjacent Footing Load = Axial Dead Load on Stem = Soil Over Toe Surcharge Over Toe Stem Weight(s) Earth @ Stem Transitions= Footing Weight Key Weight Vert Component Total = i = = = > ~~ = = 1500 275 2356 2250 686 07: 023 07? 073 050 1 50 1125 69 1767 1687 1029 8580 Ibs RM<7568 6 00005m Cone w/ #4 @ 18 in o/c Sliding Restraint #0@0 in @Toe #0@0 in @Heel 2 9 3 3 Designer select all honz remf i 4—I DL=150 LL= 40 0049999990 0005# Ecc= 0 0005m Sliding Restraint Pp= 309 38# 246 09# 11168psf Title Dsgnr Description Job* Date 3 03PM 7 FEE 07 Re 580018 User KW 0605766 Ve 580 1 Dec 2003 (C)19B3 2003 ENERCALC Eng 9 S ft* Scope Code Ref ACI 318 02 1997 UBC 2003 IBC 2003 NFPA 5000 Cantilevered Retaining Wall Design ..._ Pase 1 I« ~ 0603 b w ecv*C I I to I Description Planter 3 ft RW Criteria Soil Data L,Footing Strengths & Dimensions Retained Height Wall height above soil Slope Behind Wall Height of Soil over Toe Soil Density Wind on Stem 300ft 1 00ft 000 1 600m HOOOpcf 00 psf Design Summary b;^mmmmitmmv*x&Mvr-\-,.::'. = Total Bearing Load resultant ecc Soil Pressure @ Toe Soil Pressure @ Heel Allowable Soil Pressure Less Than Allowable ACI Factored @ Toe ACI Factored @ Heel Footing Shear @ Toe Footing Shear @ Heel Allowable Wall Stability Ratios Overturning Sliding Allow Soil Bearing = 2 000 0 psf Equivalent Fluid Pressure Method psi Heel Active Pressure Toe Active Pressure Passive Pressure Water height over heel Footmg||Soil Friction Soil height to ignore for passive pressure 35 0 psf/ft 35 0 psf/ft 275 0 psf/ft 00ft = 0400 000 in fc = 2500 Mm As0/ Toe Width = Heel Width = Total Footing Width = Footing Thickness = Key Width = Key Depth = Key Distance from Toe = Cover @ Top = 3 00 in Fy =60 000 psi 00014 0 50 ft 1 25 1 75 1200m 0 00 in 0 00 in 0 50 ft @ Btm = 3 00 in Stem Construction Top stem 873 Ibs 3 07 in 935 psf OK 62 psf OK 2 000 psf 11 92 psf 79 psf 3 7 psi OK 5 1 psi OK 85 0 psi 245 OK 2 35 (Vertical Co Sliding Calcs (Vertical Component Used) Lateral Sliding Force = less 1 00% Passive Force= less 100% Friction Force= Added Force Req d = for 1 5 1 Stability = 280 0 Ibs 309 4 Ibs 3490 Ibs 00 Ibs OK 0 0 Ibs OK Design height Wall Material Above Ht Thickness Rebar Size Rebar Spacing Rebar Placed at r^f^inn r^'atiL/coiyil LJdla fb/FB + fa/Fa Total Force @ Section ft = = = = = = = lbs = Moment Actual ft-# = Moment Allowable Shear Actual Shear Allowable 3 Bar Develop ABOVE Ht Bar Lap/Hook BELOW Ht Wall Weight Rebar Depth d masonry (Jala — — — fm Fs Solid Grouting = psi = psi = m = m = = m = psi = psi = = Stem OK 000 Masonry 800 # 4 2400 Center 0339 1531 1568 4620 37 194 2400 600 780 381 1 500 24000 Yes Footing Design Results Factored Pressure Mu Upward Mu Downward Mu Design Actual 1 Way Shear Allow 1 Way Shear Toe Reinforcing Heel Reinforcing Key Reinforcing Toe 1 192 234 64 170 366 8500 None Speed None Speed None Speed Heel 79 psf Oft-# 266ft-# 266ft-# 5 14 psi 85 00 psi Special Inspection Modular Ratio n Short Term Factor Equiv Solid Thick No 2578 1 000 in = 7 60 Masonry Block Type = Medium Weight Concrete Data - — — f c psi = Fy psi = Other Acceptable Sizes & Spacmgs Toe Not req d Mu < S Fr Heel Not req d Mu < S Fr Key No key defined Title Dsgnr Description Job # Date 3 03PM 7 I EB 07 Scope Code Ref ACI 318 02 1997 UBC 2003 IBC 2003 NFPA 5000 Re 580018 User KW 0605766 Ve 580 1 Dec 2003 (c)1983 2003 ENERCALC Eg ee ng S ftw Cantilevered Retaining Wall Design Page 2 cwC lit s Description Planter 3 ft RW Summary of Overturning & Resisting Forces & Moments L {%^^j:g£a£^»8!gA5S^s^^ OVERTURNING Force Distance Moment Ibs ft ft-#Item Heel Active Pressure = Toe Active Pressure = Surcharge Over Toe = Adjacent Footing Load = Added Lateral Load = Load @ Stem Above Soil = SeismicLoad = 2800 1 33 3733 Total = 2800 OTM = 3733 Resisting/Overturning Ratio = 2 45 Vertical Loads used for Soil Pressure = 872 5 Ibs Vertical component of active pressure used for soil pressure RESISTING Force Distance Moment Ibs ft ft-# Soil Over Heel Sloped Soil Over Heel Surcharge Over Heel Adjacent Footing Load Axial Dead Load on Stem = Soil Over Toe Surcharge Over Toe Stem Weight(s) Earth @ Stem Transitions= Footing Weight Key Weight Vert Component 1925 1 46 l = = > ~ 1 = 275 3120 2625 780 8725 Ibs 000 02C 083 088 050 1 75 RM = 2807 69 2600 2297 1366 8 00005m Mas w/ #4 @ 24 in o/c Solid Grout #0@0 in @Toe #0@0 in @Heel Designer select , 6 i 13all honz remf •— -« 1 9 Pp= 309 38# 280 # 935 38psf B O a D D D D a a D D a JOB SHEET NO /./s COTTRELL ENGINEERING Consulting Structural Engineers CALCULATED BY_ CHECKED BY _ SCALE _ OF DATE. DATE, 7U -* 1 JOB. SHEET NO . COTTRELL ENGINEERING Consulting Structural Engineers CALCULATED BY_ CHECKED BY SCALE OF DATE. DATE. ' * J V <£. t+ die. 5(2, 0 PRODUCT 207 \oJQ3 O ^ 0— Js> -2.X <^ £.O ~-^ o^>l D 5f CDo f-\ ^~ r—^±fy^£.[Db ~* ' -jQb '^-^ HH^^H ^ Di r^^v-» "^ .^ 7SVP1 8s? p« ^t P-X3r~?\^— ?*-)7^E"\ir>Dfi\rt;°6^1ii§wwC/5 ° 5310p oms9 m<o^ B««0en -n^>s 85z c >o gorn J v >S ^~nxU0Co1/T" n/i^5^00s-c. o0)ofrIPs-d £ T O 5e P! com !™3! m 12^!^ii :si *ibh 4 j IN-^> i 0" N/Ig o9I isip8 S T> tl 2-loo