Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2070 LAS PALMAS DR; ; CB160800; PermitCity of Carlsbad 05-03-2016 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 Commercial/Industrial Permit Permit No: CB160800 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 Job Address: Permit Type: Parcel No: Valuation: Occupancy Group: 2070 LAS PALMAS DR CBAD Tl Sub Type: INDUST Lot#: 0 Construction Type: 1 B Reference# 2130611400 $20,000.00 Status: ISSUED Applied: 02/29/2016 Entered By: JMA Plan Approved: 05/03/2016 Issued: 05/03/2016 Inspect Area Project Title: ADD ROLL UP DOOR TO BUILDING REPLACE RETAINING WALL Applicant: BRUCE STEINGRABER 24665 RANCHO SANTA TERESA DR RAMONA CA 92065-6354 760-789-3269 Building Permit Add'l Building Permit Fee Plan Check Add'l Building Permit Fee Plan Check Discount Strong Motion Fee Park Fee LFM Fee Bridge Fee BTD#2 Fee BTD#3 Fee Renewal Fee Add'l Renewal Fee Other Building Fee Pot. Water Con. Fee Meter Size Add'l Pot. Water Con. Fee Reel. Water Con. Fee Green Bldg Stands (SB1473) Fee Fire Expedidted Plan Review $203.29 $0.00 $142.30 $0.00 $0.00 $5.60 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1.00 $0.00 Total Fees: $352.19 Total Payments To Date: Inspector: FINAL Date: ll Plan Check #: Owner: WELLS LLOYD GIFT TRUST 11-24-87 17083 OLD COACH RD POWAY CA 92064 Meter Size Add'l Reel. Water Con. Fee Meter Fee SDCWAFee CFD Payoff Fee PFF (3105540) PFF (4305540) License Tax (3104193) License Tax (4304193) Traffic Impact Fee (31 05541) Traffic Impact Fee (4305541) PLUMBING TOTAL ELECTRICAL TOTAL MECHANICAL TOTAL Master Drainage Fee Sewer Fee Redev Parking Fee Additional Fees HMP Fee Green Bldg Standards Plan Chk TOTAL PERMIT FEES $352.19 Balance Due: Clearance: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 ?? ?? $352.19 $0.00 NJTICE: Please ta<e CE ~ ri ya.r poqect indt..des tJ-e "lrrp:siticrl' fees, dedc:atialS, reservaticrs, or dh3r ea:.ticrs l"seafter ooledivay refara:l to as "fees/ea:.ti " You ~"law 9J days frcm tJ-e date !lis p!lll"it v.as iSSU3d to pretest irrp:sitim ri thase fees/ea:.tions. If you prctest th3rn you rrust fdiON tJ-e pretest poodres set forth in <?aiemrert Qx:le SectiCJI"I a:m:J(a), a-d file tJ-e pretest a-d eTrf dh3r l"a:f.ired infarraiCJI"I wth tJ-e aty 1\tmg:!r for p-oa:ssirg in a:xnda m v.ith Ca1stm M.ridpal Ca:le SectiCJI"I 3.32.CID. Fah.re to tirrely fdiON that pmrlre wiii:B" eTrf Slblt"q.st legal aiiCJI"I to alta:K, review, set aside, wid, or c:rrU their irrp:sition. You ae tlefecy R..RTrER NJTIRED that ya.r ngt to pretest tt-e specifioo feeslea:.ticrs cx::ES I\OT PPPL Y to wcJs a-d 'fSM!l cx:medim fees ard ~ chi:rges, nor plcnirg, zmrg, ga:irg or dh3r sirrila-~ia:tim p-oa:ssirg or sel"'.1ce fees in cx:medim wth !lis poqect. lllR cx::ES IT PPPL Y to errt . . . . CE~ . . . . .. City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 05-03-2016 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) Permit Permit No:SW160170 Job Address: Permit Type: Parcel No: Reference #: CB#: Project Title: Applicant: 2070 LAS PALMAS DR CBAD SWPPP 2130611400 CB160800 NEW RETAINING WALL WELLS LLOYD GIFT TRUST 11-24-87 17083 OLD COACH RD POWAY CA 92064 Emergency Contact: ED FUDURICH 858-229-4001 SWPPP Plan Check SWPPP Inspections Additional Fees TOTAL PERMIT FEES Status: Lot#: 0 Applied: Entered By: Issued: Inspect Area: Tier: Priority: Owner: WELLS LLOYD GIFT TRUST 11-24-87 17083 OLD COACH RD POWAY CA 92064 ISSUED 04/11/2016 JMA 05/03/2016 1 L $49.00 $59.00 $0.00 $108.00 Total Fees: $108.00 Total Payments To Date: $108.00 Balance Due: FINAL APPROVAL DATE .llh!-~~~EARANC., ___ , SIGN~TURE ____ L~~:::---- $0.00 THE FOLLOWING APPROVALS REQUIRED PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE: • __ ;PLANNING :_::!ENGINEERING c ... JBUILDING ,_ }FIRE , __ HEAlTH ; :HAZMATIAPCD : .. ':"" Bulking Pelnllt Application Plan Check No.c.Jnl \..C,~Q {_ Cicyof 1635 Faraday Ave., Car1sbad, CA 92008 Eat. Value t 0 .Dl1 {~ Carlsbad Ph: 760-602-2719 Fax: 760-602-8558 Plan Ck. Deposit' email: building@car1sbadca.gov www.caltsbadca.gov Date L\ -fu-\lo ISWPPP JOB ADDIIf.SS • 1 ...... 213 2070 Las Palmas -061 -14 - Cf/PR(liECT • I LOT• 1 ....._. ro.wUNITS rBEDKUUM:> •BATHROOMS ,'IEIWIIT--I OONSrR. 1YPE I occ. GROUP 8 80-34 I Ul' WU11R: IJJCIIIda5QIIMI Feet AIN(s) New roll-up door, loading dock landing moved back 5' 3 1/4" and new retaining wall EJIIS1W8 IIH I PROPOSED USE I GARAGE (SF) PATIOS (Sf) I DECKS (Sf) FIREPLACE I rR CONOmONING II FIRE SPRINKLERS office/warehouse office/warehouse YESIJ Nc{ZJ ves[ZINoD ves[ZINOO APPLICAIIT lUilE Dan Levy Construction Co., Inc. (Jack Perry) PROPEiriY OWIIER NAME Lloyd Wells Construction [........,CeiiiMt ADDRESS ADDRESS 3435 Camino Del Rio South, Suite 215 17083 Old Coach Road CITY STATE ZIP CITY STATE ZIP San DieQo CA 92108 Poway CA 92064 PHONE rAX PHONE 'FAX 619-284-9227 619-284-1463 858-229-4001 EMAIL EMAIL jack@danlevyconstruction.com edf@ceco-cal.com DE$18111 PROFESSIOIW. Bruce W. Steingraber COfR'RACI'OR IUS. NAME Dan Levv Construction Co .• Inc. ADDRESS ADDRESS 24665 Rancho Santa Teresa 3435 Camino Del Rio South, Suite 215 CITY STATE ZIP CllY STATE ZIP Ramona CA 92065 San Diec~o CA 92108 PHONE PHONE 760-789-3269 I FAX 619-284-9227 I FAX 619-284-1463 EMAIL EMAIL bwsaia@hughes.net jack@danlevyconstruction.com ISTATEUC.• STATEUC .• I ClASS I aJY BUS. uc.• 0012953 270046 B&C9 (Sec. 7031.5 Bus1ness and Professions Code: Arrt Ci!Y or Cou~ which requ1res a ll(lnnit to construct. alter, 1mprove, demolish or repaw BOY. structure, poor to itS -~..also I!I!!Uires the applicant for such pennit to file a sillned statelll&nt tl\at he Is liCensed pursuant to the I)!OViSions of the Contractor's Ucense Law IChallter 9, commendingwith Section 7vuu of DMslon 3 of the Business and Proflissions Code} or that he is exemJ!t therefrom, and the basis for the aUeaed exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicantror a pennit sub]ecls the applicant to a civil penalty of not more then fiVe hundred dollars {$500}). Wollin' Compellllllan Dec:llnllan: I hBI8by a11tm 11111er pentJily rl Pf1liq ooe rlhl Albltlg dedtnllons: 0 I hlw llld wllllllinllln • c:er1111c:1te of COI-.t to ......._ tlr IIOik8ls' c:on.-ISallon as provided by Secllon 3700 fl the Labor Code, tlr fie perbmanoe fllhe .n for 1ihich this penn11 is issued. llJ I hlw llld wllllllinllln lfOI'IIers' c:GIIIIIIIIIIIIIon, as I8QIRd 1W Sedlon 3700 flthe Labor Code, tlrlhe perbmanoe fllle .rt tlrwl*:h this pennll is issued. My IIIIOikels' c:on.-ISalion i1smn:a carter llld policy rumer ae: lnsunn:a Co. Everest National insurance Company Poley No. 7600010255 Expira1ion Dale 11M/2016 l!&,sedlon need not be complel8d If 11e penn11 is rorooe 11n1n1c1 doi8IS ($100) or lass. U Clrtlllc:lflt of ex.npllon: lcertlry lhat In the perbmanoe flh .n tlr IIHch this pennllls issued, I shall not aqmy lilY peqonln lilY IIWI18I" so as 111 become IUJject 111 1he Wolters' Compensallon Laws fl c:aarorna. WARriNG: Fllllln to IICift lfOI'IIers' c:GIIIIIIIIIIIIon llld IIIIIIUbjlct • .... to crlmlnll ........ llld c:hlllinll up to one hunchd thol.-cl daiiiS (&100,000~ In lddlllan to ... CGit of c:ompellllllor~ cllnllgll• lllllllmer'lfla A!5 CONTRACTOR SIGNATURE I hBI8by alltm flat I am 8JIIIIIIllfrom COnlllictln /Jcense Law tlrlhe lbbltlg ~Moo: 0 I, as 011111er fllhe property or my ernplo)<ees • wages as thai' sole oompensalklll, wl do lhe .n llld lhe sllucbl81s not inllnled or ollilled tlr sale (Sec. 7044, Business llld Pn:Jiessions Code: The Conlnl:b"s Ucansa lair does not apply 111 an 011111er fl property who ldls or in1JRM!Sihel8on. llld who does such .n hinllelf or lhRlugh his 01111 ~ provided lhal such ~ ae not iniBnded orollilled tlr sale. If,.._, the Idling or ln1pnMimant Is &Iii wtil one )'8ri ~ lhe Olllller-tdlerwl 11M lhe llllden fl pRJ't'lng lhallle did not ldl or 1111J11M1tlrllle P111J0S8 d sale). D I, as 011111er fllle property, am exdusMIIy ~ •llcansed c:onn:m 111 oonsllucllle j)Rljacl (Sec. 7044,11usiness llld Pn:Jiessions Code: The Conlr.I:O's license lair does not apply to an 01111er fl property who ldls or irr1plows lhenlon,llld con1rac1s tlr such projecls • oonllli:IDr(s) lcansed ptnUant111 lhe COnni:U's Ucansa Law). 0 I an ~ lllder Seclion __________Jluslllld Pn:Jiessions Code tlr Ills 18a11011: 1. I personaly plan 111 provide 111e major labor llld rnaiBrlals tlr construction fl the proposed property ln1pnMimant. [Jves C)o 2. I (11M I 11M not) sQned an appllcallon tlr a Idling pennll tlrlhe IJIUPOii8d wort. 3. I 11M oonlra:tad with lie fobling peqon (linn) 111 provide llle p!qiOII8CI construction (Include 11111111 addr8SS I phone I conlrac1Dis' bnse runbel): 4. I plan ID provide porllons ollhe Wlllk. bull 11M hlnld lhe tJiowlng peqon111 COORIInale, sql81Wi8111d provide lhe major .rt (Include 11111111 I addr8SS I phone I conlrac1Dis' bnse runbel): 5. I wl provide some of lhe .rt, bull 11M oonlra:tad (hOd) lie tJiowlng penons 111 provide lie .rt ildicaBI (Include 11111111 I llldless I phone I lype fl.rt): A!5 PROPERTY OIIIINER SIGNATURE DATE Is lhe app11cart orfubnlddlng oa:upat requlnJd t1 submit a business l)lsi.IWBiy haza1lous maata1s nl(llslnllon bm or risk 1111118g11111811! ll1d pnMI1Ifon pognrn lllllar Seclons 25505, 25533 or 25534 rA lhe Pnlsley-TIRIIJr Hlullow S1D1ance Acc01111 Act? Y• I No Is the app11cart or fubnldllng oa:upat requll8d t1 oblaln a permit from lie rll poUon c:oniRll dlslrlct or rll CIUIIIII¥ na1111J111118111 dlsblct? Yes ' No Is 11e fa:llty t1 be c:onslnl:tlld 1111*1 1,000 faet rA lhe outar ~~o~n~ay rA a sciiJd &118? Y• ' No F Nf'f OF TtE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTFICATE OF OCCUPANCY IIAYNOT BE ISSUED III.ESS TtE APPLICANT HAS IIET OR IS IIEETING TtE AEQUIREIEHTS OF TtE OFFICE OF EIERGENCY SERVICES AND TtE AIR POLLUTION CON1ROl DISTRICI'. A:$' APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE STOP: THIS SECTION NOT REQUIRED FOR BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE. Complete the following ONLY if a Certificate of Occupancy wiU be requested at final Inspection. Fa (760) 602-8560, Emil building@cartsbadca.gov ar Mill the~ form kl City d C811sbad, BuildiJ;I Division 1635 Faraday Avenue, C811sbad, Calrornia 92008. DELIVERY OPI10NS PICK UP: CONTACT (Usted above) OCCUPANT (Usted above) CONTRACTOR (On Pg. 1) MAIL TO: CONTACT (Lilted above) OCCUPANT (Usted abow) CONTRACTOR (On Pg. 1) MAIL/FAXT001HER: ______________ _ AS' APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE carlsbad CA ~nDCBt'--------------------- NO CIWI8E IN USE/ NO C0NS1RUC110N CHANGE OF USE/ NO CONSI'RUCIION DATE Inspection List CB160800 TI INDUST ADD ROLL UP DOOR TO BUILDING Date Inspection Item Inspector Act Comments REPLACE RETAINING WALL Permit#: Type: 66 Grout PY PA06/22/2016 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PY AP06/10/2016 Monday, December 19, 2016 Page 1 of 1 PERMIT INSPECTION HISTORY REPORT (CB160800) BLDG-Commercial 02/29/2016Application Date:Permit Type:Owner:TRUST WELLS LLOYD GIFT TRUST 11-24-87 Subdivision:Tenant Improvement 05/03/2016Work Class:Issue Date: 2070 Las Palmas Dr Carlsbad, CA Address:Issued - Active 12/19/2016Expiration Date:Status: IVR Number: 712778 Scheduled Date Inspection Type Inspection No.Inspection Status Primary Inspector Reinspection CompleteActual Start Date 11/16/2016 11/16/2016 BLDG-Final Inspection 001288-2016 Passed Paul York Complete COMMENTS PassedChecklist Item BLDG-Building Deficiency No BLDG-Plumbing Final No BLDG-Mechanical Final No BLDG-Structural Final No BLDG-Electrical Final No December 19, 2016 Page 1 of 1 INSPECTION DATE: 06/10/2016 DAILY FIELD REPORT I AM AUTHORIZED BY THE INDICATED AGENCY TO PERFORM SPECIAL INSPECTION IN THE CATEGORY CHECKED. UCTURALSTEELASSEMBLY JOB ADDRESS BD"ilOING PERMIT NUMBER PLAN FILE NUMBER 3QZO l.11 fiahii&S &F., eail!ftad, CA. OWNER OR PROJECT NAME -·~· .. -~ ...... _ .. ~·----- L.W. Remodel Sf?'i B CONSTR. MATERIAL (TYPE, E, ETC.) JDESlGNSTRENmi:r'"IoURCE OF MF'Glr·~ ........ A'R:cH"it'EcT··-·······~·-····-·~·-·-····· .. ···-~---..... -.... ~.- DESCRIBE MATERIAL (MIX DESIGN, RE-BAR GRADE& MANUFACTURER:w'E[O:R:tib~fc.)·--1 ENGINEER See Report · ·------···-----~············ ......... ·····-··· ........ !:I.!K.~~~···---· GENERAL CONTRACTOR Dan Lev Construction ·-·-···--···"· ............... ----···--------............ ~CONTRACTOR PERFORMING REPORTED WORK Epoxy product: Simpson SET XP, # 129R358R, exp. 05/2017. Location: (5) #5 dowels at each of (2) (N) to (E) footing connections Hole diameters: 3/4" Effective embedment: 5" per det. 3/SD-1. Note: All holes were drilled with a rotary hammer drill and carbide tipped bit, then brushed with a nylon rush and blown out with compressed air repeatedly until dust free prior to injecting the epoxy. The entire procedure meets or exceeds plan details and ESR 2508 requirements. No discrepancies were observed or noted. All work is subject to City of Carlsbad approval. Craig Bechtel NAME OF REGISTERED INSPECTOR I ENGINEER I TECHNICIAN {PLEASE PRINT) Cr~'Bedttek.~-----·ICC 5265295 SIGNATURE CERTIFICATE NUMBER CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. IS IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AND THE APPLICABLE WORKMANSHIP PROVISIONS OF THE GOVERNING STANDARDS. INSPECTION DATE: 06/15/2016 DAILY FIELD REPORT r""""""~--·---•-"""" I AM AUTHORIZED BY THE INDICATED AGENCY TO PERFORM SPECIAL , INSPECTION IN THE CATEGORY 'CHECKED. ~ STRUCTURAL STEEL ASSEMBLY PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE DEEP FOUNDATION -L--=---"··~f·---:::~::--R-E·I-N-·F-·0--R-C~E~D·-MASONRY~---SPRAY -APP-LI--E---0-F--IR-E-PR-.. 0--0--F-I .. N.··-GI 2070 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA. "oW' ESIGN STRENGTH oEsCR'iBEMAi'E"RiAr(MixofsiGN, RE·BAR. AoTI1'~1iJiiJ'FAcTuRE:R: wELl.):RoB": .. 'ETc.) See Report ~WOOD , .... "-··"'""""""""~~----.. --............ _,_~---.. --... -----·"··-"""" .. " -----------~"--------+~~~r!tc1a~~~~~~~r~RE~PO-RT_E_O-WQf-\K--~--·­ i ~RRlVALTIME 1 pEPARTURE DETAllEDREPORT OF ORK INSPECTED C. D.C. OCATION OF WORK INSPECTED~TEST SAMPLESTAKEN;-woRK REJECTED, JOB PROBLEMS, ROGRESS, REMARKS, ETC. f-···------1:-1-o,-bs_e_rv_e_d.,...t_h_e_e_p-ox_y_p_r-oc_,e_s_s_o-::-f --::-#5-re....,.b_a_r -do_w_e.....,ls-in-to.......,the (E) concrete as noted below. Epoxy product· Simpson SET XP, # 129R358R, exp. 05/2017. Location: (4) #5 (V) dowels at the (N} CMU wall. Hole diameters: 3/4" Effective embedment: 6" per det. 3/SD-1. I Note: All holes were drilled with a rotary hammer drill and carbide tipped bit, then brushed with a nylon brush and blown out with compressed air repeatedly until dust free prior to injecting the epoxy. The entire ' .procedure meets or exceeds plan details and ESR 2508 requirements. No discrepancies were observed or noted. All work is subject to City of Carlsbad approval. Craig ~echtel NAME OF REGISTERED INSPECTOR I ENGINEER I TECHNICIAN (PLEASE PRIND CnU.f''B~'--------ICC 5265295 SIGNATURE CERTIFICATE NUMBER CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. IS IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AND THE APPLICABLE WORKMANSHIP PROVISIONS OF THE GOVERNING STANDARDS. INSPECTION DATE: 06/17/2016 DAILY FIELD REPORT 1 ----~-''"''"""'"'"~--, I AM AUTHORIZED BY THE INDICATED AGENCY TO PERFORM SPECIAL /INSPECTION IN THE CATEGORY ! CHECKED t"JmfADDRESS,, _____ -__ BUILDING-PERMIT NUMBE'R""'"'""l PLAN,FILENTJMBER _____ ,,,,.,, ..... ,, 2070 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA. CB16-0800 __ , ___ ,"''"'""""~--""'"""--+oA"'P::-.PUCATJON.""'N"""UM""'B=ER~· --~-"~----"'-""""""""""""""'""""""'" .. -"""""·--··· ::·~~~,·=r:~,=_r'"'"' DESCRIBE MATERIAL (MIX DESIGN, RE-BAR GRADE & MANUFACTURER, WELD-ROD, ETC.) See Report ocATION oF woRK INSPECTED, fE'", ~.,,,v,·~Es TAKEN, woRK REJEcfED.Jos PROBLE~-------­ ROGREss. REMARKS, ETC. obseNed ifieepoxy process of 5/8" all thread-rod-sTntoHie{E) concrete as noted below. Epoxy product: Simpson SET XP, # 129R358R, exp. 05/2017. Location: at the {N) opening in the (E) tilt up panel; (10) rods connecting the {N) HSS 5x5x3/16" column to the {E) tilt up panel and {2) rods connecting the W'x6-1/2"x10" column base plate to the (E) S.O.G. at each f (2) columns. Hole diameters: 3/4" I Effective embedment: 5" per det. 16SD-1. Note: All holes were drilled with a rotary hammer drill and carbide tipped bit, then brushed with a nylon brush and blown out with compressed air repeatedly until dust free prior to injecting the epoxy. The entire procedure meets or exceeds plan details and ESR 2508 requirements. No discrepancies were observed or noted. All work is subject to City of Carlsbad approval. Craig Bechtel NAME OF REGISTERED INSPECTOR I ENGINEER I TECHNICIAN (PLEASE PRINT) Cn:.tC.ft'Bedtt:ek"--_____ ,ICC 5265295 SIGNATURE CERTIFICATE NUMBER CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, IS IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AND THE APPLICABLE WORKMANSHIP PROVISIONS OF THE No. BD-38181 V1 GOVERNING STANDARDS. Page 2 of2 ;.c.., • '1 Certif~ad und3r thl.s namo ; Craig A Bechtet Cl.ty, State Zi p :viSTA, CA 92081-8333 Certi!icati.on R~lnforced Concrete Spaciallns:pector Needs ACI Field Tech Grade l(expifes 05/06/2018) Srructw·at MaS.Ort!'y Spec:iallnspector(explres 03 -'06!20Hl1 cc .. lmer .• ;ai 3uitdlng lrspector{expfres OS:C!i. 2(1.1.(<1 ~'·v-:"~:r··1 St '¥! a-nd e.c;tfng SQecial ~rlSO'eCtOI'(i:':xp:reN 0 5/06/2018) ~"ttuc:.~.:ul~ WP.tdi~q Specla: Inspector( expires 'l':t'PS (s) '05/C6/~ClJ/ ACI Concrete Field Testing Technician- Grade I CRAIG A BECHTEL Certification 10 #01049670 Expires on: 04/25/2020 Verify at CheckACI.org EsGil Corporation In Cl'artnersliip witli government for (]JuiUling Safety DATE: 04/20/2016 JURISDICTION: City of Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 16-0800 PROJECT ADDRESS: 2070 Los Palmas SET: II Q APPLICANT !~¥'JURIS. Q PLAN REVIEWER 1:1 FILE PROJECT NAME: Lloyd Wells -New Tilt-up opening 10X12; New Retaining Wall D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's codes. I:8J The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. D The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at EsGil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. D The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: [8J EsGil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. D EsGil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Bruce St1{graber -Telephone#: 619-994-5848 Date contacted: (by:tJ?{) Email: bwsaia@hughes.net Mail Telephone Fax In Person I:8J REMARKS: All "S" sheets shall bear the original seal of the engineer responsible for the preparations of the structural plans prior to issuing the permit. By: Aaron Goodman EsGil Corporation D GA D EJ D MB D PC Enclosures: 04/14/2016 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858) 560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 EsGil Corporation In <PartnersfJip witfJ t;jo'Vernment for 0uicaing Safety DATE: 03/09/2016 JURISDICTION: City of Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 16-0800 SET: I D.ftPPLICANT ,)iT JURIS. D PLAN REVIEWER D FILE PROJECT ADDRESS: 2070 Los Palma:s C...~ \J Lei o.... ~ PROJECT NAME: Lloyd Wells -New Tilt-up opening 10X12; New Retaining Wall D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's codes. D The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. I:8J The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at EsGil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. lXI The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Bruce Steingraber D EsGil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. ~ EsGil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Bruce Steingraber Telephone#: 619-994-5848 _pate contacted: sf q (by:(C.r Email: bwsaia@hughes.net ~ail ~leRhO~ Fax In Person D REMARk&' \1'' By: Aaron Goodman EsGil Corporation D GA D EJ D MB D PC Enclosures: 03/03/2016 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858) 560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 City of Carlsbad 16-0800 03/09/2016 GENERAL PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: City of Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 2070 Los Palmas DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 03/03/2016 REVIEWED BY: Aaron Goodman FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): PLAN CHECK NO.: 16-0800 DATE REVIEW COMPLETED: 03/09/2016 This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the International Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. The approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. • Please make all corrections and submit Four new complete sets of prints to: THE JURISDICTION'S BUILDING DEPARTMENT. • To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. • Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? D Yes D No City of Carlsbad 16-0800 03/09/2016 1. Please make all corrections, as requested in the correction list. Submit FOUR new complete sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (THREE sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 2. Please provide a scope of work on the plans. The application suggests that the only project under this permit number is the proposed 1 0 x 12 opening cut into a concrete tilt up wall. The plans and calculations are showing a proposed retaining wall. Please clarify. 3. Please clarify the address of this project and coordinate the address on the plans, permit application and engineer's calculations. a) The address on the application is: 2070 Los Palmas b) The address on the calculations is: 2070 Camino Vida Roble c) The address on the sheet AS is: 2070 Camino Vida Roble d) The address on the remaining plan sheets is: 2055 Corte Del Nogal The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Aaron Goodman at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. ~ity of Carlsbad 16-0800 03/09/2016 [DO NOT PAY-THIS IS NOT AN INVOICE] VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: City of Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 16-0800 PREPARED BY: Aaron Goodman BUILDING ADDRESS: 2070 Los Palmas BUILDING OCCUPANCY: S BUILDING AREA Valuation PORTION (Sq. Ft.) Multiplier Cut opening in Tilt up wall New overhead door Retaining walls Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE Jurisdiction Code cb By Ordinance Bldg. Permit Fee by Ordinance . ,.., Plan Check Fee by Ordinance "'"::tj Type of Review: 0 Complete Review 0 Repetitive Fee 3 Repeats Comments: macvalue.doc + D Other D Hourly EsGil Fee DATE: 03/09/2016 Set I Reg. VALUE ($) Mod. 20,000 20,000 $203.291 $132.141 D Structural Only I------41Hr. @ • $113.841 Sheet 1 of 1 A'~·· ~.~ ~ CITY OF PLAN CHECK REVIEW TRANSMITTAL Community & Economic Development Department 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 www.carlsbadca.gov CARLSBAD DATE: 04/21/201~ROJECT NAME: SPY BUILDING REMODEL DOCK PROJECTID:CB160800 PLAN CHECK NO: 1 VALUATION: $6,000 SET#:l ADDRESS: 2070 LAS PALMAS APPLICANT CONTACT: BWSAIA@HUGHES.NET APN: 2130611400 D Tlis plan check review transmittal is to notify you of clearance by: LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION Final Impe ction by the Construction & Inspection Division is required: Yes No X ~ For status from a division not marked below, please call 760-602-2719 This plan check review is N<I'COMPLETE Items missing or incorrect are listed on the attached checklist. Please resubmit arne nded plans as required. VALRAY MARSHALL 760-602-27 41 VALRA Y. MARSHALL@CARLSBADCA. GOV Remarks: NO EASEMENTS AND ALL THE ROLL UP DOOR IS IS STRICTLY BUILDING AND THE RETAINING WALL IS A PART OF THE DOCK AND IS BUILDING. DOCK ALREADY EXISTS THEY ARE FIXING IT. ~~ STANDARD PROJECT Develoement Services.. (_City of REQUIREMENT Land Development Engineering CHECKLIST 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad E-36 760-602-2750 www.carlsbadca.gov .· ·Ptolect lnfolmatton .. Project Name: L .111 IZfJtAr£'1£1 SPY &ot.. Project ID: _ !' :k. otc.e-to DWG No. or Building Permit No.: c::.~J u,-ofirs o .·. j ••. · ; · :,a..arce ControiBMPs . <:' ..... ·.: All development projects must implement source control BMPs SC-1 through SC-6 where applicable and feasible. See Chapter 4 and Appendix E.1 of the BMP Design Manual for information to implement source control BMPs shown in this checklist. Answer each category below pursuant to the following. • "Yes" means the project will implement the source control BMP as described in Chapter 4 and/or Appendix E.1 of the Model BMP Design Manual. Discussion/justification is not required. • "No" means the BMP is applicable to the project but it is not feasible to implement. Discussion/justification must be provided. • "N/A" means the BMP is not applicable at the project site because the project does not include the feature that is addressed by the BMP (e.g., the project has no outdoor materials storage areas). Discussion/justification may be provided. / ~Ct.mtnll-........ f A, SC-1 Prevention of Illicit Discharges into the MS4 I DYes I ~No I D N/A Discussion/justification if SC-1 not implemented: / SC-2 Storm Drain Stenciling or Signage I DYes I D No II6N/A Discussion/justification if SC-2 not implemented: / SC-3 Protect Outdoor Materials Storage Areas from Rainfall, Run-On, I DYes I DNa II1N/A Runoff and Wind Dispersal Discussion/justification if SC-3 not implemented: / • SC-4 Protect Materials Stored in Outdoor Work Areas from Rainfall, Run-On, lm"Yes J DNa I D N/A Runoff, and Wind Dispersal Discussion/justification if SC-4 not implemented: / SC-5 Protect Trash Storage Areas from Rainfall, Run-On, Runoff, and Wind I cvlves I DNa I D N/A Dispersal Discussion/justification if SC-5 not implemented: £X!s?JtJG ~ CoJJ'],:}JtJ ,.,, N'l E-36 Page 1 of3 REV02/16 " .··.· '' ·' :'·. SC-6 Additional BMPs based on Potential Sources of Runoff Pollutants must answer for each source listed below and identify additional BMPs. (See Table in Appendix E.1 of BMP Manual for guidance). ~ o On-site storm drain inlets DYes o N/A o Interior floor drains and elevator shaft sump pumps DYes D N/A o Interior parking garages DYes ~ D N/A o Need for future indoor & structural pest control DYes ON/A o Landscape/Outdoor Pesticide Use DYes D N/A o Pools, spas, ponds, decorative fountains, and other water features DYes D N/A o Food service DYes ~ ON/A o Refuse areas DYes D N/A o Industrial processes DYes D N/A D Outdoor storage of equipment or materials DYes ~ D N/A o Vehicle and Equipment Cleaning DYes ~ ON/A D Vehicle/Equipment Repair and Maintenance DYes D N/A o Fuel Dispensing Areas ~s ON/A o Loading Docks es ~ D N/A o Fire Sprinkler Test Water DYes ~ D N/A o Miscellaneous Drain or Wash Water DYes D N/A o Plazas, sidewalks, and parking lots DYes ~0 D N/A For "Yes" answers, identify the additional BMP per Appendix E.1. Provide justification for "No" answers. ~,.b p~ >um( fVmf E-36 Page 2 of3 REV. 02/16 Site Design BMPs All development projects must implement site design BMPs SD-1 through SD-8 where applicable and feasible. See Chapter 4 and Appendix E.2 thru E.6 of the BMP Design Manual for information to implement site design BMPs shown in this checklist. Answer each category below pursuant to the following. • "Yes" means the project will implement the site design BMPs as described in Chapter 4 and/or Appendix E.2 thru E.6 of the Model BMP Design Manual. Discussion I justification is not required. • "No" means the BMPs is applicable to the project but it is not feasible to implement. Discussion/justification must be provided. • "N/A" means the BMPs is not applicable at the project site because the project does not include the feature that is addressed by the BMPs (e.g., the project site has no existing natural areas to conserve). Discussion/justification may be provided. Site Design Requirement I / APplied? SD-1 Maintain Natural Drainage Pathways and Hydrologic Features I ~es I DNo I D N/A Discussion/justification if SD-1 not implemented: \ / SD-2 Conserve Natural Areas, Soils, and Vegetation I ~es I D No I D N/A Discussion/justification if SD-2 not implemented: / SD-3 Minimize Impervious Area J DYes I DNo I !i'I"N/A Discussion/justification if SD-3 not implemented: ~ SD-4 Minimize Soil Compaction I DYes I D No I ~/A Discussion/justification if SD-4 not implemented: / SD-5 Impervious Area Dispersion I DYes I D No I ~/A Discussion/justification if SD-5 not implemented: / SD-6 Runoff Collection I [/Yes I D No I D N/A Discussion/justification if SD-6 not implemented: ~~sntJG 5VW1f' -?vmf JN L.OA4)J{')G ~C}-c:;.. \1\lft.L..'- / SD-7 Landscaping with Native or Drought Tolerant Species I DYes I DNo I ~/A Discussion/justification if SD-7 not implemented: / SD-8 Harvesting and Using Precipitation I DYes I DNo I rm/A Discussion/justification if SD-8 not implemented: E-36 Page 3 of 3 REV. 02/16 ,,, l_ City of Carlsbad STORM WATER STANDARDS QUESTIONNAIRE E-34 Land Development Engineering 1635 Faraday Avenue 760-602-2750 www.carlsbadca.gov To address post-development pollutants that may be generated from development projects, the City requires that new development and significant redevelopment priority projects incorporate Permanent Storm Water Best Management Practices (BMP's) into the project design per Carlsbad BMP Design Manual (BMP Manual). To view the BMP Manual, refer to the Engineering Standards (Volume 5). This questionnaire must be completed by the applicant in advance of submitting for a development application (subdivision, discretionary permits and/or construction permits). The results of the questionnaire determine the level of storm water standards that must be applied to a proposed development or redevelopment project. Depending on the outcome, your project will either be subject to 'STANDARD PROJECT' requirements or be subject to 'PRIORITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT' (PDP) requirements. Your responses to the questionnaire represent an initial assessment of the proposed project conditions and impacts. City staff has responsibility for making the final assessment after submission of the development application. If staff determines that the questionnaire was incorrectly filled out and is subject to more stringent storm water standards than initially assessed by you, this will result in the return of the development application as incomplete. In this case, please make the changes to the questionnaire and resubmit to the City. If you are unsure about the meaning of a question or need help in determining how to respond to one or more of the questions, please seek assistance from Land Development Engineering staff. A completed and signed questionnaire must be submitted with each development project application. Only one completed and signed questionnaire is required when multiple development applications for the same project are submitted I concurrently. PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT NAME: £.. W. QEIVJoDt!L 9PY ~\il\..!l>1NC? , PROJECTID: c fb tc~ -o &or~ The project is (check one): 0 New Development ~evelopment The total proposed disturbed area is: L£YJ ft2 ( ) acres The total proposed newly created and/or replaced impervious area is: La.e. ft2 ( ) acres If your project is covered by an approved SWQMP as part of a larger development project, provide the project ID and the SWQMP # of the larger development project: Project ID: SWQMP#: Then, go to Step 1 and follow the instructions. When completed, sign the form at the end and submit this with your application to the City. E-34 Page 1 of4 REV02/16 I' \____City of Carlsbad DETERMINATION OF PROJECT'S SWPPP TIER LEVEL AND CONSTRUCTION THREAT LEVEL E-32 Development Services Land Development Engineering 1635 Faraday Avenue 760-602-2750 www .carlsbadca.gov I'm applying for: 0 Grading Permit Building Permit 0 Right-of-way permit 0 Other Project Name:L w. r2tlr1otlb sri M.Project 10: ---:--:r--DWG #/CB# c:B I [p-o&r!o Address:Zo70 tA> ,eAc..t!l$ APN?.f;?.O'/ .. f?f Disturbed Area: II?) s/! Jw Section 1: Determination of Project's SWPPP Tier Level (Check applicable criteria and circle the corresponding SWPPP Tier Level, then go to section 2) Exempt -No Threat Project Assessment Criteria My project is in a category of permit types exempt from City Construction SWPPP requirements. Provided no significant grading proposed, pursuant to Table1, section 3.2.2 of Storm Water Standards, the r.!?..!!.Q~.!~.9J?~~-~.!!~--~~--~-~~~.I?..!..f.r.9~ ... ~Y'!f.P..~P.. . .f.~9.~.!~~!!.!~!)rt~; ............. -.. ····-··············-r··-·····---····--····················--···················--··-·-··············1 ~ };> Electrical ~ };> Patio ~ };> Mobile Home ~ };> Plumbing ~ };> Spa (Factory-Made) ~ t:::F.:::·-~:~~~:~~~~~:~~~:I~:::::~:~~~~~i~~J::~~~:~:~~~~~~~i::::::~::::t::~::~~:~~~~~~~:~~:~:~:r~~:~~§~~!~~~~~!~-~~i~~~~~~~:-1 Tier 3-Significant Threat Assessment Criteria-(See Construction General Permit (CGP) Section I. B)* [J My project includes construction or demolition activity that results in a land disturbance of equal to or greater than one acre including but not limited to clearing, grading, grubbing or excavation; or, [J My project includes construction activity that results in land disturbance of less than one acre but the construction activity is part of a larger common plan of development or the sale of one or more acres of disturbed land surface or, [J My Project is associated with construction activity related to residential, commercial, or industrial development on lands currently used for agriculture; or [J My project is associated with construction activity associated with Linear Underground/overhead Projects {LUP) including but not limited to those activities necessary for installation of underground and overhead linear facilities (e.g. conduits, substructures, pipelines, towers, poles, cables, wire, towers, poles, cables, wires, connectors, switching, regulating and transforming equipment and associated ancillary facilities) and include but not limited to underground utility mark out, potholing, concrete and asphalt cutting and removal, trenching, excavation, boring and drilling, access road, tower footings/foundation, pavement repair or replacement, stockpile/borrow locations. [J Other per CGP Tier 2-Moderate Threat Assessment Criteria: My project does not meet any of the Significant Threat Assessment Criteria described above and meets one or more of the following criteria: 0 Project requires a grading plan pursuant to the Carlsbad Grading Ordinance (Chapter 15.16 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code); or, 0 Project will result in 2,500 square feet or more of soils disturbance including any associated construction staging, stockpiling, pavement removal, equipment storage, refueling and maintenance areas and project meets one or more of the additional following criteria: • located within 200 feet of an environmentally sensitive area or the Pacific Ocean; and/or, • disturbed area is located on a slope with a grade at or exceeding 5 horizontal to 1 vertical; and/or • disturbed area is located along or within 30 feet of a storm drain inlet, an open drainage channel or watercourse; and/or • construction will be initiated during the rainy season or will extend into the rainy season (Oct. 1 _,.through Apr. 30}. TiJ" 1-Low Threat Assessment Criteria 1St My project does not meet any of the Significant or Moderate Threat criteria above, is not an exempt permit type per above and the project meets one or more of the following criteria: • results in some soil disturbance; and/or • includes outdoor construction activities (such as roof framing, saw cutting, equipment washing, material stockpiling, vehicle fueling, waste stockpiling) SWPPP Tier Level Exempt Tier3 Tier2 Tier 1 * Items listed are excerpt from CGP. CGP governs cntena for tnggers for Trer 3 SWPPP. Developer/owner shall confirm coverage under the current CGP and any amendments, revisions and reissuance thereof. E-32 Page 1 of2 Rev. 2/16/16 SWPPP Section 2: Determination of Project's Construction Threat Level Tier (Check applicable criteria under the Tier Level as determined in section 1, circle Construction Level the corresponding Construction Threat Level, then complete the Threat Level signature block below) Exempt -Not Applicable -Exempt Tier 3 -High Construction Threat Assessment Qriteria: M~ Project meets one or more of the following: [J Project site is 50 acres or more and grading will occur during the rainy season [J Project site is located within the Buena Vista or Agua Hedionda Lagoon watershed, inside or within 200 feet of an environmentally sensitive area (ESA) or discharges directly to an ESA High Tier3 [J Soil at site is moderately to highly erosive (defined as having a predominance of soils with USDA-NRCS Erosion factors kf greater than or equal to 0.4) [J Site slope is 5 to 1 or steeper [J Construction is initiated during the rainy season or will extend into the rainy season (Oct. 1-Apri130). [J Owner/contractor received a Storm Water Notice of Violation within past two years Tier 3 -Medium Construction Threat Assessment Criteria Medium [J All projects not meeting Tier 3 High Construction Threat Assessment Criteria Tier 2 -High Construction Threat Assessment Criteria: M~ Project meets one or more of the following: [J Project is located within the Buena Vista or Agua Hedionda Lagoon watershed, inside or within 200 feet of an environmentally sensitive area (ESA) or discharges directly to an ESA [J Soil at site is moderately to highly erosive (defined as having a predominance of soils High Tier2 with USDA-NRCS Erosion factors kr greater than or equal to 0.4) [J Site slope is 5 to 1 or steeper [J Construction is initiated during the rainy season or will extend into the rainy season (Oct. 1-Apr. 30). [J Owner/contractor received a Storm Water Notice of Violation within past two years [J Site results in 10,000 sq. ft. or more of soil disturbance Tie[ 2 -Medium Construction Threat Assessment Criteria Medium [J My project does not meet Tier 2 High Threat Assessment Criteria listed above Tier 1 -Medium Construction Threat Assessment Criteria: M~ Project meets one or more of the following: Cl Owner/contractor received a Storm Water Notice of Violation within past two years Medium Cl Site results in 500 sq. ft. or more of soil disturbance Tier1 [J Construction will be initiated during the rainy season or will extend into the rainy season (oyt1-April30) Tief1 -Low Construction Threat Assessment Criteria Low IB My project does not meet Tier 1 Medium Threat Assessment Criteria listed above I certify to the best of my knowledge that the above statements are true and correct. I will prepare and submit an appropnate tier level SWPPP as deterrnmed above prepared in accordance with the City SWPPP Manual. I understand and acknowledge that I must adhere to and comply with the storm water best management practices pursuant to n1e 15 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code and to City Standards at all times during construction activities for the permit type(s) checked above. The City Engineer/Building OffiCial may authorize minor variances from the Construction Threat Assessment Criteria in special circumstances where it can be shown that a lesser or higher SWPPP Tier Level is warranted. Owner/OWner's ~uthorized Agent Name: Title: City Concurrence: Yes No J3f-.vc.e (IV. 5 ~J~fZ A ~ H1-a:c:r (For City Use Only) G owz~orized~-rure: Date: 4/u /ILP J_, 7-~-- By: Date: Project ID: E-32 Page 2 of2 Rev. 2/16/16 STEP1 TO BE COMPLETED FOR ALL PROJECTS To determine if your project is a "development project'', please answer the following question: YES/ NO Is your project LIMITED TO routine maintenance activity and/or repair/improvements to an existing v' building or structure that do not alter the size (See Section 1.3 of the BMP Design Manual for guidance)? If you answered "yes" to the above question, provide justification below then Go to step 5, mark the third box stating "my project is not a 'development project' and not subject to the requirements of the BMP manual" and complete applicant information. Justification/discussion: (e.g. the project includes only interior remodels within an existing building): T#J!. f~t c) IS f<tE/11<#v'ltV6 fl:J(2.j 0 r-/3'(:J.57fyVb laA/)LrN~ t1oc. l<_ LMOt~ AtiP f2r--~,A::::!-v-f j IJr;IA! y<~JNtN(s oJ4~'-4 If you answered "no" to the above question, the project is a 'development project', go to Step 2. STEP2 TO BE COMPLETED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS To determine if your project is exempt from PDP requirements pursuant to MS4 Permit Provision E.3.b.(3), please answer the following questions: Is your project LIMITED to one or more of the following: YES NO 1. Constructing new or retrofitting paved sidewalks, bicycle lanes or trails that meet the following criteria: a) Designed and constructed to direct storm water runoff to adjacent vegetated areas, or other non- erodible permeable areas; b) Designed and constructed to be hydraulically disconnected from paved streets or roads; c) Designed and constructed with permeable pavements or surfaces in accordance with USEPA Green Streets guidance? 2. Retrofitting or redeveloping existing paved alleys, streets, or roads that are designed and constructed in accordance with the USEPA Green Streets guidance? 3. Ground Mounted Solar Array that meets the criteria provided in section 1.4.2 of the BMP manual? If you answered "yes" to one or more of the above questions, provide discussion/justification below, then Go to step 5, mark the second box stating "my project is EXEMPT from PDP ... " and complete applicant information. Discussion to justify exemption ( e.g. the project redeveloping existing road designed and constructed in accordance with the USEPA Green Street guidance): If you answered "no" to the above questions, your project is not exempt from PDP, go to Step 3. E-34 Page 2 of4 REV. 02/16 STEP3 TO BE COMPLETED FOR ALL NEW OR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS To determine if your project is a PDP, please answer the following questions (MS4 Permit Provision E.3.b.(1)): YES NO 1. Is your project a new development that creates 10,000 square feet or more of impervious surfaces collectively over the entire project site? This includes commercial, industrial, residential, mixed-use, and public development projects onpublic or private land. 2. Is your project a redevelopment project creating and/or replacing 5,000 square feet or more of impervious surface collectively over the entire project site on an existing site of 10,000 square feet or more of impervious surface? This includes commercial, industrial, residential, mixed-use, and public development projects on public or private land. 3. Is your project a new or redevelopment project that creates and/or replaces 5,000 square feet or more of impervious surface collectively over the entire project site and supports a restaurant? A restaurant is a facility that sells prepared foods and drinks for consumption, including stationary lunch counters and refreshment stands selling prepared foods and drinks for immediate consumption (Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code 5812). 4. Is your project a new or redevelopment project that creates 5,000 square feet or more of impervious surface collectively over the entire project site and supports a hillside development project? A hillside development project includes development on any natural slope that is twenty-five percent or greater. 5. Is your project a new or redevelopment project that creates and/or replaces 5, 000 square feet or more of impervious surface collectively over the entire project site and supports a parking lot? A parking lot is a land area or facility for the temporary parking or storage of motor vehicles used personally for business or for commerce. 6. Is your project a new or redevelopment project that creates and/or replaces 5,000 square feet or more of impervious surface collectively over the entire project site and supports a street, road, highway freeway or driveway? A street, road, highway, freeway or driveway is any paved impervious surface used for the transportation of automobiles, trucks, motorcycles, and other vehicles. 7. Is your project a new or redevelopment project that creates and/or replaces 2,500 square feet or more of impervious surface collectively over the entire site, and discharges directly to an Environmentally Sensitive Area (ESA)? "Discharging Directly to" includes flow that is conveyed overland a distance of 200 feet or less from the project to the ESA, or conveyed in a pipe or open channel any distance as an isolated flow from the project to the ESA {i.e. not commingled with flows from adjacent lands).* 8. Is your project a new development or redevelopment project that creates and/or replaces 5,000 square feet or more of impervious surface that supports an automotive repair shop? An automotive repair shop is a facility that is categorized in any one of the following Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) codes: 5013, 5014, 5541, 7532-7534, or 7536-7539. 9. Is your project a new development or redevelopment project that creates and/or replaces 5,000 square feet or more of impervious area that supports a retail gasoline outlet (RGO)? This category includes RGO's that meet the following criteria: (a) 5, 000 square feet or more or (b) a project Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of 100 or more vehicles per da_y. 10. Is your project a new or redevelopment project that results in the disturbance of one or more acres of land and are expected to generate pollutants post construction? 11. Is your project located within 200 feet of the Pacific Ocean and ( 1) creates 2,500 square feet or more of impervious surface or (2) increases impervious surface on the property by more than 10%? (CMC 21.203.040) If you answered "yes" to one or more of the above questions, your project is a PDP. If your project is a redevelopment project, Go to step 4. If your project is a new project, Go to step 5, check the first box stating "My project is a PDP ... " and complete applicant information. If you answered "no" to all of the above questions, your project is a 'STANDARD PROJECT', "Go to step 5, check the second box stating "My project is a 'STANDARD PROJECT' ... " and complete applicant information. E-34 Page 3 of4 REV. 02/16 STEP4 TO BE COMPLETED FOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS THAT ARE PRIORITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS PDP ONLY . Complete the questions below regarding your redevelopment project (MS4 Permit Provision E.3.b.(2)): YES NO Does the redevelopment project result in the creation or replacement of impervious surface in an amount of less than 50% of the surface area of the previously existing development? Complete the percent impervious calculation below: Existing impervious area (A) = sq. ft. Total proposed newly created or replaced impervious area (B)= sq. ft. Percent impervious area created or replaced (B/A)*100 = % If you answered "yes", the structural BMP's required for PDP apply only to the creation or replacement of impervious surface and not the entire development. Go to step 5, check the first box stating "My project is a PDP ... " and complete applicant information. If you answered "no," the structural BMP's required for PDP apply to the entire development. Go to step 5, check the check the first box stating "My project is a PDP ... " and complete applicant information. STEPS CHECK THE APPROPRIATE BOX AND COMPLETE APPLICANT INFORMATION 0 My project is a PDP and must comply with PDP stormwater requirements of the BMP Manual. I understand I must prepare a Storm Water Quality Management Plan (SWQMP) for submittal at time of application. 0 My project is a 'STANDARD PROJECT' OR EXEMPT from PDP and must only comply with 'STANDARD PROJECT' stormwater requirements of the BMP Manual. As part of these requirements, I will submit a "Standard Project Requirement Checklist Form E-36'' and incorporate low impact development strategies throughout my project. Note: For projects that are close to meeting the PDP threshold, staff may require detailed impervious area calculations and Jxhibits to verify if 'STANDARD PROJECT' stormwater requirements apply. li' My Project is NOT a 'development project' and is not subject to the requirements of the BMP Manual. Applicant Information and Signature Box Applicant Title: /4. C. T-\-11¥ ~ Date: 1_] /1 (t (g I * Environmentally Sensitive Areas include but are not limited to all Clean Water Act Section 303(d) impaired water bodies; areas designated as Areas of Special Biological Significance by the State Water Resources Control Board (Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin (1994) and amendments); water bodies designated with the RARE beneficial use by the State Water Resources Control Board (Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin (1994) and amendments); areas designated as preserves or their equivalent under the Multi Species Conservation Program within the Cities and County of San Diego; Habitat Management Plan; and any other equivalent environmentally sensitive areas which have been identified by the City. This Box for City_ Use Only City Concurrence: I YES I NO I I By: Date: Project ID: E-34 Page 4 of4 REV. 02/16 "" ~ \ \ EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY R£SJD£NCE W/8AS£M£NT MAIN FF=J2.84 8AS£M£NT FF=2J.83 PROPOSED MAIN FF=JJ.OB BASEMENT FF=22.0 EXISTIN'ii-~G£ W/GU£ST HOUSf FF=37.74 ~ SETBACK UN£ ~ 0 UNIT PARK~WfUNG :\ SAND-SET ~P£RWOUS)COBBL£STON£ 7!1 LEGEND (£) WALL TO DESCRIPTION R£MAIN *DWG.NO. SYMBOL N45'45'45"W ~< ~ cs IF INLETS AR£ INSTALLED PRESERVATION OF EXISTING VEGETATION B£YOND PER EC-2, TYPICAL AND FUNCTION~ BUT TH£ CONSTRUCTION SI7E IS UNFINISHED, PROTECT INLETS PER SE-10, TYPICAL PROPERTY LINE SILT FENCE FIBER ROLL PRESERVATION OF EXISTING INLET PROTECTION GRAVEL BAG BERM/BARRIER DIRECTION/COURSE OF FLOW SE-1 SE-5 EC-2 SE-10 SE-6 HYDRAULIC MULCH/HYDROSEED EC-1. EC-4 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE TR-1 MATERIALS DELIVERY AND STORAGE AREA WM-1 TEMPORARY TRASH/SOLID WASTE WM-5 HAZARDOUS AND CONCRETE WM-6, WM-8 WASTE MANAGEMENT SANITARY WASTE WM-9 (PORTABLE TOILET) -o 0}---- -x-x-x-x- L17 7 7 7 ZL7l ~ ~ ------~ m111111111m I WM-1 ] I WM-5 I [ WM-6 I WM-8 I WM-91 *STANDARD DRAWINGS (SE-5, WM-5. ETC.) CAN BE FOUND AT THE CALIFORNIA STORMWATER QUALITY ASSOCIATION (CASQA) WEBSITE: http:/ /www.cabmphandbooks.com/ QUANTITY STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION NOTES 1. ALL NECESSARY EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS SHALL BE AVAILABLE ON SITE TO FACILITATE RAPID INSTALLATION OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPs WHEN RAIN IS EMINENT. 2. THE OWNER/CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES TO WORKING ORDER TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE CITY INSPECTOR AFTER EACH RUN-OFF PRODUCING RAINFALL. 3. THE OWNER/CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE CITY INSPECTOR DUE TO INCOMPLETE GRADING OPERATIONS OR UNFORESEEN CIRCUMSTANCES WHICH MAY ARISE. 4. ALL REMOVABLE PROTECTIVE DEVICES SHALL BE IN PLACE AT THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY WHEN THE FIVE (5) DAY RAIN PROBABILITY FORECAST EXCEEDS FORTY PECENT ( 40%). SILT AND OTHER DEBRIS SHALL BE REMOVED AFTER EACH RAINFALL. 5. ALL GRAVEL BAGS SHALL CONTAIN 3/4 INCH MINIMUM AGGREGATE. 6. ADEQUATE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL AND PERIMETER PROTECTION BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE MEASURES MUST BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED. 7. THE CITY INSPECTOR SHALL HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO ALTER THIS PLAN DURING OR BEFORE CONSTRUCTION AS NEEDED TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH CITY STORM WATER QUALITY REGULATIONS. OWNER'S CERTIFICATE: I UNDERSTAND AND ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I MUST: (1) IMPLEMENT BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPS) DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICABLE TO AVOID THE MOBILIZATION OF POLLUTANTS SUCH AS SEDIMENT AND TO AVOID THE EXPOSURE OF STORM WATER TO CONSTRUCTION RELATED POLLUTANTS; AND (2) ADHERE TO, AND AT ALL TIMES, COMPLY WITH THIS CITY APPROVED TIER 1 CONSTRUCTION SWPPP THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES UNTIL THE CONSTRUCTION WORK IS COMPLETE AND APPROVED BY THE CITY OF CARLSBAD. ~ DATE E-29 STORM WATER COMPLIANCE FORM TIER 1 CONSTRUCTION SWPPP E-29 CB {b-6&J0 swjp_-''10 BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP) SELECTION TABLE Erosion Control Sediment Control BMPs Tracking Non-Storm Water Waste Management and Materials BMPs Control BMPs Management BMPs Pollution Control BMPs c: -+-' c: c: 0 -+-' 0 0 :;:::; c: c: "0 :;:::; :;:::; 0'> c Q) "0 Q) "0 II) c: (.) (.) c: 0'> E c: E -+-' c ::I ::I 0 c: ·;:: c c: -+-' 'C c. c c E ~ ~ :;:::; ~ ·:; Q) ::::E "0 II) 0'> ~ Q) -+-' -+-' c: .:::::::. >. 0'> c:Q) ~ c: Q) c men II) c ·;:: C" ~ c c: 0'> c. Q) ·;:: -c: II) c: > ~ w ~ 0 Best Management Practice* old .!: cc; c rn ·a. ~ 0 Q) 0 ~ (.!) Q) c: :;:::; rn3: II) ~ Q) ....-Q) c ....-.s= c: I-E Q) c c: u~ (.) II) ~ "0 Q) II) ::::E c: Q) c: (BMP) Description ---7 II) (.) Q)(/) -~ Q) II) 0'> Q)O'> rn '5 c: 0'> c: "Om c: Cl ::::> ~ ...... Q) Q) 'S ~Q) (.) -+-' c 0 c "' c: ~0 ~~ "0>. 0 II) c: c: c Q) ~E :;:::; c: Cl rn (/) ·-0'> Cl:;:; (.)Q) oo 0'> Q) ::::E Cle> Cl c: Q) 0::: E 0 Nil) :!:lc c::n:.;:; Q) ~ .!: cQ) 0 ·a. ~-3::Q) X Q) Ehl =3: (.) ·-0'> c...e Q) 0 E ..::.t:. Q) -<-'::::J .0 =~ ~·-::0 ·;:: 0'> "0 .s=c: Q) I..&.. ~ Q) ::I ·-"0 20 c: 0 uc: ~c ..::.t:. -oC ....-....-·-c. 'C (.) > "0 ~ ....-.0~ .oc ·~~ 0 ·-c Q)~ Q) (.) --+-' 0 0 ~0 -+-' Q) Q) 0 Q)(.) c: 0 0 00'> ....-.s=Q) ..... 0 ..... 0 = c: ·-c: Q) 0 0 .s= .0 ~c 0 .Eo co 0 c ...... c c.o oc c ~ Q) ~ -+-' ~ ..... c: s::ct ~u -+-' (.!) 3::: WCl (i) Vi (/) (.) G: (.!) (/)> (/) (/) c.. (/)-(/) 0::: Cl...O c.. ::::i!(l) ::::E (/) (/)(.) (l)::::i! CASQA Designation ---7 ,...._ 00 (]) ~ ,.., ...r 1.{) tO ,...._ 00 0 N ~ ,.., ,...._ 00 ~ N ,.., ...r 1.{) ~ ~ ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I (.) (.) (.) (.) w w w w w w w w ~ ~ (/) (/) (/) (/) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Construction Activity w w w w (/) (/) (/) (/) (/) (/) (/) (/) z z z z Grading/Soil Disturbance )( Trenching/Excavation IX Stockpiling Drilling/Boring ·~ X Concrete/Asphalt Sawcutting X ><. ><.. ~ Concrete Flatwork Paving Conduit/Pipe Installation Stucco/Mortar Work Waste Disposal .. Staging/Lay Down Area Eauioment Maintenance and Fueling Hazardous Substance Use/Storage Dewatering Site Access Across Dirt Other (I ist ): Instructions: 1. Check the box to the left of all applicable construction activity (first column) expected to occur during construction. 2. Located along the top of the BMP Table is a list of BMP's with it's corresponding California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA) designation number. Choose one or more BMPs you intend to use during construction from the list. Check the box where the chosen activity row intersects with the BMP column. 3. Refer to the CASQA construction handbook for information and details of the chosen BMPs and how to apply them to the project. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL CHOSEN BMPs ABOVE ON THE PROJECTS SITE PLAN/EROSION CONTROL PLAN. SEE THE REVERSE SIDE OF THIS SHEET FOR A SAMPLE EROSION CONTROL PLAN. PROJECT INFORMATION Site Address: ~~7 0 LA5 ft) t MA ~ Assessor's Parcel Number: 2./:J,. O(p \ "'/4 Name: vV ,-vI./ (II'\ I CAl 24 Hour Phone: 868 -Z...~C31 .-4-0o I Construction Threat to Storm Water Quality (Check Box) MEDIUM )Q LOW Q) -+-' II) c ;: ...... c: II) Q) ::IE OQ) "CO'> 5o NC: co :::C::::E tO I ~ Q) -+-' II) c....- 3::C: Q) Q) E -+-'Q) Q)O'> t; 0 c:c: 0 0 U::::E 00 I ~ X. Page 1 of 1 REV 02/16 «~~> ~ CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DIVISION BUILDING PLAN CHECK APPROVAL P-29 DATE: 3/1/2016 PROJECT NAME: ROLL UP DOOR PROJECT ID: Development Services Planning Division 1635 Faraday Avenue {760) 602-4610 www.carlsbadca.12:ov PLAN CHECK NO: CB160800 SET#: 1 ADDRESS: 2070 LAS PALMAS DR APN: ~ This plan check review is complete and has been APPROVED by the PLANNING Division. By: VERONICA MORONES A Final Inspection by the PLANNING Division is required DYes [81 No You may also have corrections from one or more of the divisions listed below. Approval from these divisions may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Resubmitted plans should include corrections from all divisions. D This plan check review is NOT COMPLETE. Items missing or incorrect are listed on the attached checklist. Please resubmit amended plans as required. Plan Check APPROVAL has been sent to: bwsaia@hughes.net For questions or clarifications on the attached checklist please contact the following reviewer as marked: PLAINtiG 7~~-~l&.o D Chris Sexton 760-602-4624 Chris.Sexton@carlsbadca.gov D Gina Ruiz 760-602-4675 Gina.Ruiz@carlsbadca.gov I:8J Veronica Morones 760-602-4619 Veronica.Morones@carlsbadca.gov D ~-~···· 7$().1Q~-215o Chris Glassen 760-602-2784 Christopher.Giassen@carlsbadca.gov D VaiRay Marshall 760-602-27 41 VaiRay.Marshall@carlsbadca.gov D Linda Ontiveros 760-602-2773 Linda.Ontiveros@carlsbadca.gov D Greg Ryan 760-602-4663 Gregory.Ryan@carlsbadca.gov D Cindy Wong 760-602-4662 Cynthia.Wong@carlsbadca.gov D Dominic Fieri 760-602-4664 Dominic.Fieri@carlsbadca.gov Remarks: ROLL UP DOOR ADDITION TO EXISTING BLDG. NO CHANGE IN SQ. FT., PARKING, FOOTPRINT, USE. Shay Even From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Good morning Bruce, Amber Ressmer Thursday, March 03, 2016 10:39 AM BWSAIA@HUGHES.NET Building CB160800 CB160800 plan does not require Carlsbad Fire Department fire plan review. Thank you, Amber Canrof Carlsbad Amber Ressmer Fire Prevention Office Specialist City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Ave Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 www.carlsbadca.gov p 760-602-4665 I F 760-602-8561 1 20"10 Ca..r\)uYD \J\dCk. ~ STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS PROJECT: L L \? 'i 0 h) :elkS. -q. t2b bA/2 ~HTK S T A U C T U R A L E N GIN E E AS, LLP DESIGN ASSUMPTIONS: CONCRETE STRENGTH ATTWENll' EIGHT DAYS: MASONRY: MORTAR: GROUT: GRADE "N" CONCRETE BLOCK F ' M = TYPE S 1,800 PSI 2000PSI REINFORCING STEEl: A-615 GRADE40: STRUCTURAL STEEL: A-36 LUMBER: DOUGLAS FIR-LARCH JOISTS GRADE60: #2 #2 --"2-~5dQ=-. __ PSI tr..~ _.....;.__-;:..___ _.,....,___::;; v __ PSI #4 AND LESS (U.O.N.) #5 AND LARGER BEAMS AND POSTS STUDS STUD OR BETIER SEISMIC FORCE: fA~~;:~ 1C~i wiND FoRcE: 1 to Mt'"'" REPoRT No.:_______ soil PREssuRE: r=?;a.,..J, t:L, DESIGN LOADS: ~I f/ ~ RQQF-9EA'IT[0AD[AAQ--:--------fFljLO~OHRUD~Er8AQ:DI!LO~A~Dr----~----~W~A~lj.;LQE~A~D~LQOAAQD ~~ SLOPING FLAT INT. ~ 'I;J ROOFING FLOORING PLYWOOD PLYWOO JOISTS ,...JQISTS INSUl. & CLG. ---------INSUl. & CLG. MISC. ~ MISC. TOTAL ::: ~ ___ TOTAL = ---- ROOF LIV AD FLOOR LIVE LOAD INTERIOR BALCONY EXIT WALKWAY 40 PSF 60 PSF (U.O.N.) 100 PSF INTERIOR lOPSF EXTERIOR 16 PSF These calculations are limited only to the items included herein, selected by the client and do not imply approval of any other portion of the structure by this office. These calculations a · - wet stamp and signature ofthe Engineer of Record. 2070 CAMINO VIDA ROBLE 2130611400 Tl 02-29-2016 Son Dreco • 14218 Dtnlelson Street,,Sulte a 200, Pow L11 Voa•• (7021 505-1225 Bay Areo (5101 CB160800 ues1gn Maps Summary Report ' htlp:/ /ehp2-earthqua.lre. wr.usgs.gov/desigmnaps/us/sl.JIIJll8IY.php?te.mpl. of2 EUSGS Design Maps Summary Report User-Specified Input Report Title Uoyd Wells Wed February 24, 2016 17:32:27 UTC Building Code Reference Document ASCE 7-10 Standard (whiCh utilizes USGS hazard data available In 2008) Site Coordinates 33.12001°N, 117.27903°W Site Soli Classification Site Class D -"Stiff Soiln Risk Category I/11/III Oc anadl. USGS-Provided Output 55 = 1.074 9 51= 0.415 g SMS = 1.150 9 SMl = 0.657 g SDS = 0.766 9 Sot= 0.438 g For Information on how the 55 and 51 values above have been calculated from probabilistic (risk-targeted) and deterministic ground motions in the direction of maximum horizontal response, please retum to the application and select the "2009 NEHRP" building code reference document. 0 -• Ill MCEI'l Response Spectrum 1.20 LOB 0." O.B( 0.12 0.,0 0.48 0.36 0.2 .. 0.12 0. 00 +--t-+--+--+----i---f----11---t--+--1 0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.110 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.110 2.00 Period, T (sec) ·, -.,. -II Ill O.QII Design Response Spectrum 0.110 0.72 0.,. 0.56 0.411 o.•o 0.~2 0.24 o.u; 0.08 0.00 +--t-+--+--t----i--+--t----+--1---1 0.00 0.20 0.40 0.,0 0.1!0 1.00 1.20 1.40 l .GO 1.110 2.00 Period. T (sed For PGAH, T u ~5, and ~1 values, please view the detailed report. 2/?.4/?011'. O·':t') AU CH~-PuT-ttJf-P~e o-r 14~1-'-puE -ro ,A N ekl ~PeN'~ ··.~ ··t:='.b t) 4-. ~ ~ .. l f :=;: · • . D~ J._ . W > I ' '4 ~P.t = o~n I.-=-tiD CA/ -=--a' .s r-'S ( F p -: o,t22-\.Jp t;'o--~r J > 0.1 Wp =. f fp ,.. '"· ... VI ... ~ ·' L ,.c .... •!"/. 14288 Danielson Street Su~e200 Powa CA 92064 Steel Beam II Description : DoorJamb CODE REFERENCES Project Title: ~ngineer: Profed Desa: ProlectiD: Prinllld: 26 FEB 2016. 6:47PM FUe a \\Server01~NE-1\SSI.Enan:aciLLDW·1 EC6 ENERCAI.C, INC. 1!113-20'15, lkAid:6.16.12.9, Ver:615.12.9 • • I • ··--··------·------····· .. ----·-----·---··-------------------------- Calculations per AISC 360-10,1BC 2012, ASCE 7·10 Load Combination Set: ASCE 7-10 ---~~~~~-------------- Analysis Method : Allowable Strength Design Fy ; Steel Yield : Beam Bracing : Beam is Fully Braced against lateral-torsional buckling E:Modulus: 46.0 ksi 29,000.0 ksi Bending Axis : Major Axis Bending Load Combination ji'\SCE 7-1 0 ~~ 1:_~~ -·-· --..... --·----·· --·-· --Service loads entered. Load Factors will be applied for calculations. Beam self wei!Jhl NOT internally calculated and added Load for Span Number 1 Uniform Load : E = 0.1470 kilt, Extent= 12.0 ->> 22.50 ft, Tributary Width = 1.0 ft DESIGN SUMMARY f . Maximum Bending-StreSs Ratio--;;;. Section used for this span Ma: Applied Mn I Omega : Allowable load Combination L.ocallon of maximum on span Span #where maximum occurs Maximum Deflection Max Downward Transient Deflection Max Upward Transient Deflection Max Downward Total Deflection Max Upward Total Deflection Vertical Reactions Load Comblnation Overall MAXliiium Overall MINmum -+0-tH Suppolt 1 ---·0.411 +IM.+H +lMr+H -+O+S+H -+0-+0.750Lr-+O. 750L +H +0t0.750L-+0.750S+H -+0-+0.60W+H +D-+0.70E+H -+0-+0.750lr..o.750L -+0.450W+H -+0-+0.750L -+0.7508-+0.450W+H +(}t().750L-+0.750S-+0.5250E+H -+0.60D-+0.60W-+0.60H -+0.600-+0.70E-+0.60H DeNy LrOnly LOnly SOnly WOnly EOnly H Only 0.218 0.287 0.218 0.287 0.411 o.2a5: r-Mairmum.slle&rs1i&SsRatio= ---·· -------o.o3:r:1 ___ _ HSS5x5x3118 Section used for thle span HSS5x5x3/18 3.849k-ft Va :Applied 0.7931 k 13.520k-ft Vn/Omega :Allowable 25.755 k -t0.60(}t().70E-t0.60H Load Combination -t0.60D-t0.70E-+{).60H Support2 14.771ft Location of maximum on span 22.560 ft Span # 1 Span #where maximum occurs Span # 1 1.337 In Ratio = 0.000 In Ratio= 0.937 In Ratio= 0.000 In Ratio = 210 0 <180 301 0 <180 Support no1ation : Far left is #1 ---Values In KIPS 'L""13"'3 -- 0.595 0.793 0.595 0.793 1.133 Description : Door Jamb ~ steel Sectlo~!~rtl~ _;_ ~· HSS5x5x3116 Depth 5.000 In Width Wall Thick Area Weight • ::: 5.000 In 0.174 In 3.280 lnA2 11.970 pJf 2.500 il ~----------. lxx Sxx Rxx Zx lyy Syy Ryy Project Title: Engineer: Prqect Oeser. !! 12.60 fnA4 5.03 lfl113 ::: 1.9611 il 5.890 IIJA3 = 12.8110 lrf4 ::: 5.030 llr'3 1.960 il Project 10: Printed: 26 FEB 2016, 6:47PM Fie= I\SerVII01WNGINE-1\S~lOYDW-1.EC6 ENERCAI.C.INC. 1111J3..2015, Bulld:6.15.12.9. Var:8.15.12.9 . - J 19.900 inl\4 c 0.000 llr'3 . J)G ~~rJ LPiA'OttJ& /i)OC4? ~"'~ <:·-~ ~ :!II.. _q:; (\q ~ 37f'-'/. <]? f -:: I <:;o rV r ~ -~ ,~ o ~'"""{' h < ~!4-NO !II .......,.== Ji&Uidll""h 14288 Danielson St Sultet200 Title : dock wall Job# : ... New ••• Dagnr: Page: __ Date: FEB 24,2018 Poway, CA 920&4 Description ... . Tbls Wallin File: \\server01\d\ENGINEERING FILES\SS\Ret Rataln Pro 9 0 1M8 • 2011 Ver: 8.24 1187 Reglltrllllon 1: RP-1181485 RP9.24 Ucensed to: HTK Structural Enplneens Cantilevered Retaining Wall Design Code: CBC 2010 I Criteria I Retained Height = 5.33 ft Wall height above soli = O.OOft Slope Behind Wall = 0.00:1 Height of Soli OV« Toe = 6.001n Water height over heel = O.Oft /Soli Data I Allow Soli Bearing = 1,500.0 psf Equivalent Fluid PreS&ure Method Heel Active Pressure = 35.0 psfJft Toe Active Pressure = 30.0 psflft Passive Pressure = 50.0 psflft Soil Dens~. Heel = 110.00 pet Soil Density, Toe = 110.00 pet Footingi!Soll Frlcllon = 0.400 Soil height to Ignore for passive pressure = 0.00 In '~ ) t Thumbnail ·---·-----·---· ----I~ S!,!llullll!rc~h•alllli!rg!J!!Ie•Lol!l!ad~s--~~~~ I Lateral Load Applied to Stem Surcharge Ovw Heel = 0.0 psf Lateral Load = 0.0 #1ft Used To Resist Sliding & Overturning ... Height toT()!:: = 0.00 ft I I AdJacent Footing Load Xdlacent Footing LOad = o.BIC Surcharge Over Toe == 0.0 psf ... Height to Bottom = 0.00 ft Used for Sliding & Overturning The above lateral load I Axial Load AgPiied to Stem I !;~ '}:~~n~sed 1.00 Axial Dead load = 0.0 lbs WI d 1:-...4 Stem Axial Uve Load = 0.0 lbs n on ~...,.. = 0.0 psf Axial Load Eccentricity = 0.0 In Footing Width = Eccentricity "" Wall to Ftg CL Dlst "' Footing Type Base Above/Below Soil at Back of Wall Poisson's Ratio = = 0.00 ft O.OOin o.ooft UneLoad 0.0 ft 0.300 I I Deslpn Summary Wall Stability Ratios Overturning • ~ls.t.e~m.eo .. n~s.tru~d~lo.n .. ~··-l~o~p~s=w=m~-------------------------• • S111mOK Design Height Above FfG ft= 0.00 Sliding Total Bearing Load ... resultant ecc. 3.40 OK 1.56 OK 2,5921bs 4.821n Soil PreS&ure @Toe = 1,102 psf OK Soli Pressure @ Heel = 251 psf OK Allowable = 1,500 psf Soli Pressure Less Than Allowable ACI Factored G Toe = 1,542 psf ACI Factored @ Heel = 351 psf Footing Shear @Toe = 5.8 psi OK Footing Shear @ Heel = 5. 7 psi OK Allowable = 75.0 psi Sliding Cales (Vertical Component NOT Used) lateral Sliding Force = 711. 71bs less 100% Passive Force = • 76.6 lbs less 100% Friction Force = • 1,036.91bs Added Force Req'd = 0.0 lbs OK .... for 1,5: 1 Stability == 0.0 lbs OK LoadFa~ons----------------------­ Building Code Dead Load Live Load Earth, H Wlnd,W Seismic, E CBC2010 1.200 1.600 1.600 1.600 1.000 Re1ain Pro Software© :?009 HBA Publications, Inc. All Rights Reserved Wall Material Above •Hr = Masonry Thickness = 8.00 Rebar Size = # 5 Rebar Spacing = 16.00 Rebar Placed at = Edge Design Data fb/FB + fa/Fa '" Total Force @ Section lbs = Moment. .. .Actual ft-# = Moment ... .AIIowable = Shear .... .Aclual psi = Sheer ..... AIIowable psi = Wall Weight = Rebar Depth 'd' in = LAP SPLICE IF ABOVE In= LAP SPLICE IF BELOW in = 0.444 493.4 882.7 1,986.1 7.8 38.7 78.0 5.25 30.00 HOOK EMBED INTO FTG in = 6.00 Lap splice above base reduced by stress ratio Ill n~. Hook embedment reduced by stress ratio aaonry.,.. .. rm psi = 1,500 Fs psi = 24,000 Solid Grouting = Yes Modular Ratio 'n' Short Tenn Factor Equiv. Solid Thick. Masonry Block Type Masonry Design Method Concrete Data fc Fy :. 21.48 = 1.000 In= 7.60 = Medium Weight = ASD psl= psi= licensed to: HTK Structural Engineers Poway, CA 92064 www. RetainPro.com 14288 Danielson St Suite 111200 Poway, CA 82084 T111e : dock wall Job# : .......... Description ..•. Dsgnr: Thla Wallin File: \\server01\d\ENGINEERING FJLES\SS\Ret Retain Pro 9 0 1989 • 2011 Yer: 9.24 8187 ReglllntJon Ill: RP·11 ... 15 RP9.24 Llcenaed to: HTK Structural Enplneera Cantilevered Retaining Wall Design Code: esc 2010 l Footing Dimensions & Strengths • Footing Design Rasutts • Toe Width = 0.75ft _!21..... Hill Heel Width = 3.08 Total Footing Width = 3.83 Factored Pressure = 1,542 351 psf Mu': Upward = 608 2,065 ft-# Footing Thickness = 15.00 In Key Width = 12.00 In Key Depth = O.OOin Key Distance from Toe = 2.00ft Mu' : Downward = 143 3,614 ft-# Mu: Design = 465 1,549ft-# Actuai1-Way Shear = 5.84 5.74 psi Allow 1-WayShear = 75.00 75.00 pel Toe Reinforcing = None Spec'd fc = 2,500 psi Fy = 60,000 psi Footing Concnte Density = 150.00pcf Heel Reinforcing = None Spec'd Key Reinforcing = None Spec'd Mln.Aa% = 0.0018 Covar@Top 2.00 @ B1m.= 3.00 In Other Acceptable Sizes & Spacings Toe: Not req'd, Mu < S * Fr Heel: Not req'd, Mu < S • Fr Key: Not req'd, Mu < S * Fr I Summary of Overturning & Reslstlnp Forces & Moments ..... OVERTURNING ..... • .... RESISTING ..... Force Distance Moment Force Distance Item lbs ft ft-# lbs ft Heal Active Pressure = 757.7 2.19 1,661.9 Sol/ Over Heel = 1,416.7 2.62 Surcharge over Heel = Sloped SoU Over Heel = Toe Active Pressure = -45.9 0.58 -26.8 Surcharge Over Heel = Surcharge Over Toe = Adjacent Footing Load = Adjacent Footing load =-Axial Dead Load on Stem= Added Lateral Load = * Axial Uve Load on Stem "' Load @Stem Above Soli = Soli Over Toe s 41.3 0.38 Surcharge Over Toe = Stem Weigh1(s) = 415.7 1.08 Earth @ Stem Transitions= Total :::: 711.7 O.T.M. = 1,635.1 Footing Welgh1 = 718.7 1.92 Realatlngl()vertumlng Ratio = 3.40 Key Weight : 2.50 Vertical Loads used for Soil Pressure = 2,592.4 lbs Vert. Component _= ____ _ Moment ft-# 3,718.6 15.5 450.4 1,377.4 Total• 2,592.4 lbs R.M.• 5,561.8 DESIGNER NOTES: • Axial live load NOT Included In total dlsplayedLor used for overtumlng resistance, but Is Included for soli pressure ca~a.~lation. • Retain Pro Software@ 2009 HBA Publications. Inc. All Rights Reserved Licensed to: HTK Structural Engineers Poway, CA 92064 www.RetainPro.com