Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2075 LAS PALMAS DR; ; CB004807; Permit
03/02/2001' Job Address: Permit Typi3: Parcel No: Valuation: Occupancy Group: Project Title: 02/12/2001 Applicant: LUND VANDRUFF 858 457-6860 Inspector: City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 . Commercial/Industrial Permit Permit No: CB004807 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 2075 LASPALMAS DR C.BAD Tl Sub Type: 2130611900 Lot#: $486,304.00 Construction Type: Reference #: MODETEK-17,368 SF OFFICE TO OFFICE/MANUFACTURING INDUST 0 VN FINAL APPROVAL Date: _____ _ Status: Applied: Entered By: ISSUED 12/20/2000 RMA Plan Approved: 03/02/2001 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $97.00 $110.00 $160.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $3,729.33 Clearance: _____ _ 02 2445-20 '', v·~ . PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad CA 92009 (760) 438-1161 Address (iwe Bl~g_LSuite #) C-, \50~, Legal Description Assessor's Parcel # Eiusiness Name (at this address) , Unit No. Phase No. Total # of uni\s , · City State/Zip Telephone --.-,.., .. , .. ~··"".".:.=::;:;;r:::;:;:c::~;:;;'",,·"···ICT!i'i·:::c0::s-::::?.i"ri:C'f;3,~Jr/;~1f::J (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improv1;1, demolish or repair any structure; prior to-its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statenient that he ·is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's license ·t:aw [Chapter 9, commending with Sl!ction 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code]' or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged eJ5emption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant tq a civil pen~~of no1t9~rit~n five hundred do!lars [$500]). 2_{.IN.J>;-C}p,-J,fo,dt-ile-F/#7..V 'T..,c._. 3/)75" Jvr1..A.-.P °'L >T~;;lP,P e A,-J 91,2/1 /7 -,.,,-Jr. '-/?t:?-{,,9',0c? Name Address · City · State/Zip Telephonti # State License # y / $ $? ~ r License Class r-J, I> !I.-·H I C. City Business License # l:J. 0 ,;-? :i 7 Designer Name , State License # Address City State/Zip T.elephone !6,.~0RJ{ERSfCO..M~NSATtON:~ c:--------~r:·,-=---::-~---:-: µ. .. •• ' ••• •"' "·.,;·,:;;$.;.-... 77;:.··:::_::,~,.\G/ ... -· .• r-7:,::1::-7 .::::·7·-:~q":"54 , Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury 6ne of the following declarations: 0 I have .and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compen'sation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. -~I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required. by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performancll of the work. for which this permit is issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Insurance Company $r. (}.:. v &. HA.!!; SZ-. MA~ , ,.,, IF "Policy No. W Y'J( g' J v O 1/ f ;l Expiration· Date / t?, I'• ,2 0 o I (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS [$100] OR LESS) · D CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this. permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of aliforhia. , WARNING: Fail to secu erage i awful, and shall subjl!Ct an employer to criminal penalties aod ·civil fjnes up to one h11_n!lred thousand dollar $100,0 10n, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the La.bor code, interest and attorney's fees. ' SIGNATURE-~~~~~=-62~~~=-~~~C'--------------.,,--DATE /2 1 / f' • 0 D . ii,:1>wNER°:'.'BiJJtrJejfoeci:ARATION. · :·---"··--. ·· _. ______ :_,:...:...::~_·::,;.;:,:,; __ ~~=-J-··--.,; ·: .. , '··: <,~ .• '. . .'.L.:::i:':;_:·;:-;;..;~1-,. • • ~":.:.:~L::J(·~·'.:....:_,_ ..;.._ ... _, __ _,,.:,,·. I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: . D I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will' ilo the work and the structure is not intended or offered· for sale (Sec. 7044, Bllsiness and Professions Code: The Contractor's License,,Law does ·not apply to ah owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and wlio does , such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements ,are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will Ii ave the burden of proving that h_e ·did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). t:J I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct th.a project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an ·owner .of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) ·licensed · pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). : D I am exempt under Section ______ Business and Professions Code for this' reason: / ' 1. I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. D YES ONO 2. I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. 3. I have contracted _with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors licen~e number): 4. I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, ·supervise ·and provide the major work (include name / address / phone, number/ contractors license number)=-----------------------------~------'--~----------'------ 5. I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to· pr9vide the work indicated (include name/ address/ phc,me number/ typi;i of work):_, -~----~----------~-------'----~---------------------------- _PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE . DATE_~------~ m9Me.lf.llUf!W'S§.QI!..O.rtfQJl.i,QN#..i§(()ft(Tf~.4,aj;ii~p!,N.!U'J:8Mt:r§J)f',LY,,;,..:. :::. •. :...:..:·:=...:_::\~t .. :.-~.;~.,.,.-;;'J1:.i.·-:.,::/i,..:;:~~~..J'.:L..~;\.··;;:_;,:....,... Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration f6r'm or ris~ management and prevention program under-.!3ections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the.Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? D YES ·o NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obt<!in a permit from the air pollution control.district or air quality management district? D YES D NO . . Is the facility to be co11structed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site?, 0 YES O NO ' IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE·ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. ' .. ;§r.::~:..:.Q9NS.J'.B.Q~r,01tt:.e!"tjJt(G_A.l?!;~CY . :: .. :c ·::.:..; ._:,_· ::.. .. -~. ::.--:.: .... ::...-:·.>·. ,. I hereby affirm t!iat there is a con~truction lending agency for the performance of ,the work for whic;:h this permit is issued (Sec. 3097(i) Civil Code). LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S, ADDRESS r~ . ..:. ·· ··A.~.1.QAtfr::~1;ar1F!!t.Ar•o~.1:2.s:· M •• : ¼ _ --~~:-:,,"'Z.........:...::.~~.;.:..~~1::~;(..·~·:.:2:t1::~:.::-::. L::T~;:~::.~ir:-:::::::,-.. : ~-;-iz:;;'l~:~;:,".',7 I certify that J,,have read the application and state that the above information is correct_anc! that the infqrmation on th~ plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the Citt of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA:: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over '5'0" 'deep· and demolition cir construction of structures over 3 stories in height,: EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the Buildin Official under the provisions of thi,s Code ·shall' expire by limi~ation and become null and void if the building or work a\Jthorized by i;uch permit is not comme a within ~65 d~ys ,from the date of su ermit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned-at any time work is mmehced for a period of. 180 days (Se 106.4.4 Uniform Building Co.de). -· APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE --:~'---..._.....-c:=....::.:::_::-_::_::,.:--_ -_ -_ -""' --=:. -,::;;;. =_ ---:::: _ __,,...__-='--~--DATE · / z_,. ~ f q ;~ WHITE: File YELl:OW: Applicant PINK·: Finance :i City of Carlsbad . i=-UOthOi·l•J§•tiiU,t§hl February 5, 2002 SUNDT CONSTRUCTION 4375 JUTLAND DR STE 200 SAN DIEGO CA 92111 RE: BUILDING PERMIT EXPIRATION PERMIT TYPE: TI Permit Number: Issue Date: CB004807 03/02/2001 ADDR,ESS: 2075 LAS PALMAS DR PLEASE CALL FOR AN INSPECTION IF WORK IS COMPLETE Our records indicate that your building p~rmit will expire by limitation of time on 03/12/2002. The provisions of UBC, Section 106.4.4 as amended by the Carlsbad Municipal Code state: "EXPIRATION. Every permit issued by the Building Official under the provisions of this code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such permit (unless issued prior to·-7/1/99 which is one year from date of permit), or if the building or work authorized by such permit is stopped at any time after the work is commenced for a period of 180 days or if the building or work authorized by such permit exceeds three calendar years from the issuance date of permit. Work shall be presumed to have commenced if the permittee has obtained a required inspection approval of work: authorized by the permit by the Building Official within 180 days of the date of permit issuance. Work shall be presumed to be stopped if the permittee has not obtained a required inspection approval of work by the Building Official within each 180 day period upon the initial commencement of work authorized by such permit. Before such work can be recommenced, a new permit shall be obtained to do so, and the fee, therefore, shall be one-h,alf the amount required for a new permit for such work, and provided that no changes have been made or will be made in the original plans and specifications for such work, and provided further that such suspension or abandonment has not exceeded one year. In order to renew action on a permit after expiration, the permittee shall pay a new permit fee. Any person holding an unexpired permit may apply for an extension of the time within which work may commence under that permit when the permittee is unable to commence work within the time period required by this section for good and satisfactory reasons. The Building Official may extend the time for action by the permittee for a period not exceeding 180 days on written request by the permittee showing that circumstances beyond the control of the permittee have prevented action :from being taken. No permit shall be extended more than once. Please check below indicating your intentions and return this letter to us. Project abandoned. A new permit will be obtained prior to commencing work. No fee extension requested for 180 days. (attach a letter of explanationH-f.t-u P~ Renewal permit requested. 1/ c:;;,,' -------- If the project has been ·completed and only a final inspection is needed, please call the inspection request line at (760) 602-2725. . If you have any questions, please contact the l3uildihg Inspection Department at (760) 602-2700. PAT KELLEY Principal Building Inspector 1635 Fc!,raday Avenue• C~rlsb1;:1.d, CA 9~008-7314 • (760) 602-2700 • FAX (760) 602-8560 @ Building Counter • .(760) 602-2719 • FAX (760) 602-8558 r' Inspection List Permit#: CB004807 Type: Tl INDUST . MODETEK-17,368 SF OFFICE TO OFFICE/MANUFACTURING .Date . Inspection Item Inspector Act Comments 12/29/2003 89 Final Combo TP co OK TO EXPIRE PERMIT -OUT OF . BUSINESS 09/12/2001 39 Final Electrical NF AP 09/12/2001 39 Final Electrical NF AP EMR 08/08/2001 89 Final Combo TP CA 08/07/2001 89 Final Combo TP CA PER CONT. 08/0272001 14 F rame/Steel/Bolting/W el din TP AP FRM EXT OF 1 HR CORR @ MAIL RM 07/24/2001 89 Final Combo TP co FINAL WALK THRU 07/23/2001 19 Final Structural TP Pl CONF. Oo//23/2001 29 Final Plumbing TP . WC 07/23/2001 39 Final Electrical TP WC 07/23/2001 49 Final Mechanical TP we 07/20/2001 89 Final Combo TP co 07/1°9/2001 89 Final Combo TP :NR 07/1'8/2001 19 Final Structural TP WC 07/18/2001 29 Final Plumbing TP PA EQUPT@ ROOF 07/18/2001 39 Final Electrical TP PA EQUPT@ ROOF 07/18/2001 49 Final Mechanical TP P.A EQUPT@ ROOF 07/16/2001 89 Final Combo TP Pl FINALWALKTHRU, T-24 07/11/2001 89 Final Combo TP NA 07/10/2001 89 Final Combo TP Pl' PART WALK THRU 07/09/2001 .89 Final Combo TP NS 07/0.6/2001 89 Final Combo TP NR 07/05/2001 89 Final Combo TP Pl PARTWALKTHRU 07/03/2001 14 F rame/Steel/Bolting/W eldiri TP AP T-CEIL @ LABS 07/03/2001 19 Final Structural TP WC 07/03/2001 34 Rough Electric TP AP CEIL LITES 07/03/2001 44 Rough/Ducts/Dampers TP AP HEPA S, DUCTS, PLMNS 07/02/2001 89 Final Combq TP NR 06/28/2001 39 Final Electrical TP NR 06/27/2001 29 Final Plumbing TP NR 06/27/2001 49 Final Mechanical TP NR 06/19/2001 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin TP co CEIL INSP @ CLN RMS 06/19/2001 24 Rough/Topout TP WC 06/19/2001 34 Rough Electric TP WC 06/19/2001 44 Rough/Ducts/Dampers TP WC 06/12/2001 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin TP AP T-BAR CEIL 06/12/2001 24 Rough/Top out TP we 06/12/2001 34 Rough Electric TP AP CEILLITE;S 06/12/200.1 44 Roµgh/Ducts/Dampers TP AP DUCTS, SPLIT SYSTEM UNIT, DMPRS 05/30/2001 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers TP AP ENT:STEPS 05/30/2001 12 Stee!/Bond Beam TP AP 05/24/2001 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers TP AP WALL EXTN @ ENT. STEPS 05/24/2001 12 Steel/Bond Beam TP AP Monday, December 29, 2003 Page 1 of 2 f'. 05/09/2001 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin TP co ROOF RE-INF @ PLMNS NEED DTL 05/09/2001 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin TP AP T-BAR CEIL PHS 2 05/09/2001 17 Interior Lath/Drywall TP WC 05/09/2001 34 Rough Electric TP AP CEIL LIGHTS PHS 2 05/09/2001 44 .Ro1Jgh/Ducts/Dampers TP AP DUCYS PLMNS PHS 2 05/07/2001 84 Rough Combo TP co T-CEIL 05/01/2001 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin TP co T-BAR CEIL 05/01/2001 24 Rough/Topout TP WC 05/01/2001 34 Rough Electric TP WC 05/01/2001 44 Rough/Ducts/Dampers · TP WC 04/~6/2001 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin TP AP WALL PRE:P ABOVE TUNNEL CEIL 04/26/2001 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin TP AP 1 HR CORR TUNNEL CEIL 04/2!:l/2001 17 Interior Lath/Drywall TP AP 1 HR CORR TUNNEL CEIL 04/40/2001 14 F rame/Steel/Bolting!W el din TP AP WALL @ ROLL UP DOOR 04/20/2001 17 Interior Lath/Drywall TP AP WALLS ABOVE CORR. CEIL 04/20/2001 34 Rough Electric TP AP WALL @ ROLL UP DOOR 04/13/2001 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers TP AP H-CAP RAMP WALLS @ ENT. 04/13/2001 14 F rame/Steel/Bolting/W el din 'TP PA LAB WALLS (3) SIDES UPPER SECT. 04/13/2001 16 Insulation TP PA LAB WALL (3) SIDES 04/13/2001 23 GasTTest/Repairs TP co N/R 04/09/2001 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers TP NR NOT COMP 04/09/2001 14 . Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin TP NR NOT COMP 04/09/200~ 31 . l)nderground/Conduit-Wirin TP NR NOT COMP 04/03/2001 31 Underground/Conduit-Wirin TP AP UNDER SLAB CONDUITS IN BLDG 03/28/2001 31 Under,ground/Conduit-Wirin TP WC 03/28/2001 34 Rough Electric TP AP DB PULL Sl;:CT & HOUSE PNL 03/26/2001 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin TP .co ND SUPP. REV. DO NOT LOAD PLATFORMS . 03/26/2001 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin TP AP EQPT. PLATFORMS ON ROOF FOR SHTING 03/22/2001 17 Interior Lath/Drywall TP AP HIGH WALLS @ LAB" 03/16/2001 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PY AP WAL~AYWALL:S 03/16/2001 12 Steel/Bond Beam PY WC ·03/14/2001 16 Insulation PY AP 03/14/2001 17 Interior Lath/Drywall PY AP E-LINE SOUTH 03f12/2001 11 Ftg/Foundation/P_iers PY AP DRY PACK 03/12/2001 16 Insulation F>Y AP 03/09/2001 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin PY PA. 03/09/2001 16 Insulation PY PA LID 03/09/2001 17 Interior Lath/Drywall PY PA WALL BETWEEN LABS 03/09/2001 34 Rough Electric PY PA. 03/06/2001 1'1 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PY AP 7 INTERIOR POST FTG 03/06/200:1 21 Underground/Under Floor PY AP 03/06/2001 24 Rough/Topout PY AP 03/06/2001 31 Underground/Conduit-Wirin PY AP Monday, December 29, 2003 Page 2 of 2 I ( City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 03/28/2001 Permit# CB004807 Inspector Assignment: PY --- Title: MODETEK-17,368 SF OFFICE TO Description: OFFICE/MANUFACTURING Type:TI Job Adaress: Sub Type: INDUST 2075 LAS PALMAS DR Phone: 7604319311 Suite: Lot Location: APPLICANT LUND VANDRUFF Owner: Remarks: Total Time: CD Description 31 Underground/~onduit-Wiring _1!f__ Associated PCRs lnsgection Histor~ Date Description 03/26/2001 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 03/26/2001 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 03/22/2001 17 Interior Lath/Drywall 03/16/2001 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 03/16/2001 12 Steel/Bond Beam 03/14/2001 16 Insulation 03/14/2001 17 Interior Lath/Drywall 03/12/2001 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 03/12/2001 16 Insulation 03/09/2001 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 03/09/2001 16 Insulation 03/09/2001 17 Interior Lath/Drywall Q3/09/2001 ·34 Rough Electric 03/06/2001 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 03/06/2001 21 Undergrot,md/Under Floor 03/06/2001 24 Rough/Topout 03/06/2001 31 Underground/Conduit-Wiring 0 /} Inspector:~ Requested By: DAN Entered By: ROBIN Act Comments we.- ,<)/' /J8 ,R//t,l s, tt-"f' J-b'ovf~ ;;ut-- Act lm;p Comments AP TP. EQPT. PLATFORMS ON ROOF FOR SHTING co TP ND SUPP. REV. DO NOT LOAD PLATFORMS AP TP HIGH WALLS @ LAB AP PY WALKWAY WALLS WC PY AP PY AP PY E-LINE SOUTH AP PY DRY PACK AP PY PA PY PA PY L,ID PA PY WALL BETWEEN LABS PA PY AP PY 7 INTERIOR POST FTG AP PY AP PY AP PY ' ( DAILY REPORT Project Name Subcontractor Weather: w CHRISTIAN WHEELER. [I P re-Stress~d Concrete D FieldWeldirig ENGINEERING Proi_ect # --· --- . · .. Zt?Jo. o"i..i Architect Engineer Lt,.. ';-',. . . . ,.l_y Plan File# ., ,' ··:\~ -~:(i '-'~ Time Arrivedt /::5c:,o--Time·Departed: Hours Charged: • 0 .• .. -\ii .1-3-.-:-,"-'°'\:-' .,--+-.-o;-/\)----~~--.-e:----0-. __ ...____ ____ _.__ _____ _.__ ___ -T,-~-. .v---..-,..=.--'-------'-1 _:: __ :.:\~l Date f----,---l--'J:.-::=.l.~~~Qa.i'_/..,..-:-.!::~,...;..~...L:,:;t2.~~~...!.....L~::::::L_~-:::.t.,~~&:~~~~~!:::::..-,/et.~~~:::::._ __ -l --:.<t -. -.':: l--------"--f-~=--..L~~::___zca:z:z:U!,!~-.;t::.~!!.:.__.Q.,:e:.c;:_~2<!~~~~~~-:C~:::L:a,o,.5L...._!,.~~.!.J.:..L'-------1 .. )~( ,a,. .. •, -~ · .. _-ti 1--------+-,----------~~--------------------,--------------------1 .. \j '''\ 3 ·lt·t? Date 4 9 2 5 M e r c u r y S tr e e t + Sa. n D i e g o , C A 9 2 11 1 + 8 5 8 -4 9 6--9 7 6 0 + ~ ', -~ r ,\v.:; ''-\~ ' ;~ DAILY REPORT Subcontractor· R°Reinforced Concrete 0 S~op Welding Material/Equipment: Weather: Date -·w CHRJSTIAN \¥HEELER ENGINEER,ING D Pre-Stress~d-Concrete D Field Welding Project# 'Z,c,O."'~ Permit# . c.Boo w.<oo, Architect" 1 \J~ Engineer D Reinforced Masonry 0 Fireproofing Time Departed, }~CC) Plan File# ~ ,\ D Epoxy Anchors D-------~- Hours Charged: ,._ .. : ,.· \1, r----~--r----~------------------------------------------,----,---i -, e best of my knowledge, in compliance- 4925 Mercury Stree·t + San Diego, CA 92111 + 858-496--9760 + FAX 858-496-9758 Oek{ o\Qroi~~o.ol '.j . ,· ·,',' ,, ., ,, IHtv of Carlsbad · Final Building Inspection Dept: Building Engineering Planning CMWD St Lite "Ei~ Pian Check#: Date: 07/02/2001 Permit#: CB004807 Permit Type: Tl Project Name: MODETEK-17,368 SF OFFICE TO Sub Type: mDusT OFFICE/MANUFACTURING Address: 2075 LAS PALMAS DR Lot: 0 Contact Person: DAN Phone: 6195726416 Sewer Dist: CA Water Dist: CA l!l•alill1111811111111111111111111111111111111111111 lllltltllllllllllll I 11111111111111111111111111111111••••••••••~1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 lnsp/11d &#d Date .7-f-tJ/ ~isapproved: __ Inspected: Approved: By: . Inspected Date By: Inspected: Approved: Disapproved: __ Inspected Date By: lnspectec;I: Approved: Disapproved: __ .................. , ....................................................................................................................................... . Comments: __________________ .___ __________________ _ '\ rn 381;1d L' --1 ... -- ....... -..i.,111 FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL SHEET TO: FIi.OM· CollunB21ch Dexter Humplu:ey COMPANY> l)ATI!.: C:u:l.sbad Fire Department AUGUST 31 2001 FAX NUMBP.R, T(l1'AL NO. OP PAGP..S INCLUDING COVER: (760) 602-8561 6 PHONE NUMBER: SENDER'S ll.EPERl'.NCE NUMBGR.: (760) 431-4190 RE: YOUP. REFERl::NCE NUMBER: D ·URGltN.T [] FOR REVrnw 0 PLEASF, c;o·MMENT O Pl.EASE RRPLY MBSSAGE· Letter regarding equipment move in and staging. ~075 LAS ?ALMAS Oll.IVE CARLS):IAD, CA 92001> PHONE!: (760) +31-4190 PAX: (760) 431-4380 0 PLEASE RRCYCLE >l313GOW 08£t,I£t:>0'3L ) To: Carlsbad Fire Department· From: Dexter Humphrey Date: August 3, 01 Subject: Equipment List On August 6, 01 ModeTek, Inc. will move and stage the following equipment in area's 161 A, B, and C and 161 A, B, C .and D for investor presentation on Aug\lst 9, 01.The use of 150 lb nitrogen cylinder for pneumatic valve operation will be installed for various pieces of equipment, securely stationed. Furthermore, ModeTek, Inc. is only attempting to set up a light mechanical assembly and electrical testing areas. ModeTek, Inc. will not use any chemicals for these operations. The mechanical assembly process utilizes a method of wire attachment, by use of a wire bonding tool and glue attachment of the chip to a pa,ckage container for electrical test. The electrical test process utilizes electrical testing equipment to measure and characterize chip perfonnance. I have listed below the following equipment for your review, which will be staged on August 9, 01 for investor presentation. Dexter Humphrey ModeTek Facility and Operation Manager ModeTek, Inc. 2075 Las Palmas Drive, CA 92009 Telephone: (760) 431-4190 Fax: (760) 431-4380 l0 39\1d >l313QOW 08EvtEP09L 90:st t00l/60/90 EQUIPMENT LIST Assembly Area 161D Wire Bonder 4 7 -Attaches a gold wire from chip to package container Wire Bonder 58-Attacbes a gold wire from chip to package container Oven 55-Remov_es moisture from surface of part before bonding Ribbon Bonder 59-Attaches a gold wire from chip to package container Microscope 54 -Used for optical inspection of parts Oven 64,57~ Removes moisture from surface of part before bonding Microscope & soldering iron station 63-Used solder two parts together by melted flux Dry Boxes 69 A-D -Parts storage boxes Wire Bonder 56-Attaches a gold wire from chip to package container Microscoee 49, 61, 62-Used for optical inspection of parts £0 39\Jd >l313CTOW Testing Area 160 A, B, C Auto Align Tool 53,51-Mechanical aligas an optical fiber wire to apart Fiber Splicer 52-Cuts optical fiber in to parts Seam Sealer 48-Seals container closed by automation (not available for install) Storage cabinets Ovens Microscope Electrical Test Stations-Electrical measure equipment oscilloscopes, amp meters, de volt meters, electrical wave fonn analyzers t;,0 39tld >l313GOW 08EP1£ti09L g0:s1 I00l/60/90 • I _, ._t =:::=::J.. ri II ~ ~ 9 m z C') .t ;MPCYCLE OVEN ~ ;o s m z C') :I: II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II II II II II ii II II II ii ti fl I II ! II II II II II II fl IJ II II II II II I " II II II 'fl II II II II II II II II II II II II II 90 391dd I Workbe1 o Solderin~ N2 Network Analyzer Cascade Station Vac I. 11 ·EXISTING " II II EXISTING LAB h Station Probe ~stW1 rkbench ~ "---" II II II II .__ _ ___, 11 Final TE st Documentation :: And Co ~puter ,-.------, II II..__ _ ___, Plgt iling Development N2 Vac ''@ II 11 Dry B xes 11 N2 II 11 -=='---- 11 II II II :: Final Teat Workbench i,..._ _____ _, II II II II:=:=::::::: 2'x3' Brea bi;,ard Polarizati n/Optleal Workbe; ch Microwi ~e Equipment Assemby Workbe, c Driver 0 h elopmenl Teal ltV Mlcrowa ~· Storage C ablnet MicrowaY9 • II II II " 11 Final Tt st Workbench II II JI II II!::::==::; · II 110VI\C II DR'fLN2 t(it· 2 , :: @-.:-1ber Splicing Workben h II D lilo ~es N2 , : : :=:==:L-. II II II II II II® 11 51 -I\ ewport Auto-Align ~--" 11 110VAC II :i .. ~:,1,if II &oPISG Min. II l21CP18\) llll~. N2 Vac Wafer Test E~ulpment Wafe Test Workbench 11 flllo,.<10Mk:ron 11 · on ~mo••l•<ISO C .,. lie Wafe Test Documentation And omputer II IIOVAC II DRYLNZ ,.__ _ ___, II PVAC "@ :: . .52 • .. iber Splicing Workbench II .-----,H It II 11:===;;!...- 11 6-WIAEWYE 2~0 . Wafer T st Workbench II II II II II II II ~PhlM 30,1,t,IPII DIIVLNZ cc111,.,.....iAlr Optical Table · WafetTest N2 Vac 110VAC 20AMP >l313QOW @-Newport Auto-Align @- I 110'/AC I 20M4P I FlllatadAi, I· fOPISG Mi., I ~:.:~~ o::;.,,; j 0111o<n01111•~1so c ••~ l===--r .....,..,..,.,.....,...~...r=Jl~------ 1 ,...... ....... ..l.J..l. ....... ..w..r~ii!!1i1111 08£v1£P09L g0:s1 100G/60/90 " [ .: .: .: .: .: J:l, .: ;: ;: ;: = = :ilrll , 120 15A 1·0/I HPH2 LPN2 £•h 160olm @-Al i nerMA6 120 15" 1•pt, l-lPN2 :es LPN2 EKn 1$0ttl!I @-Al I nerMA6 120 15A 1·Ph HPH2 ·LPN2 @-M ibroscope 12015.4.1-PII HPN2 LPN2 @-M O::roscope /ash 12015111-Ph MPN2 Ll'N2 ®-inewidth ,, It II ,,11 1111 ''~-II II II 11 ,, ,, 11 11 t, t1 ,, II '1 It II II ,, ,, If It ,, If If II 11 I( II ,, ,, If ,, II II II II ,, II II EJII If .ift Off S 11 II ~ -So ltec Dev. '----.....1" II ~-----11 @ -;pin Coat :: If II fl II If !:======~ II 120 15A 1·Ph Ii Hl'HZ, Lf'N2, I I Loeal Coll 11 R"l11, Aoo Palfimldl Mlle 6l I I Cllltil EKh 250 I I 11 @-pin/Coat :: 11 ,, 120 1s,, 1-pn HPN2, LPN2, AC Local Collecioo """'' AQf!Qn• olylmld1 MM •L Chim bh250 (34)-pin/Coat 90 391Jd ,,,.. - II II ''u 1111 1111 ''11 ,, I -s~~r:~e-[abinets Ir ------J ----=, II l l 0-eneral Workbench Paperwork ,,Jo ---,i 11 ~ 2 -Measuring Scope l'VN:; @-i.9h Power Inspection ,croscope Dry Boxes '4s\ enerafWorkbench ~-· · poxy Work Microsco~ I 110VAC I PVAC I ORVLN2 i. ~-WestbondP&P 20AMP ORV LN2, Vent Oven ORYLN2 FVAC fs5' Oven V!:!/ 110VAC 20AMP DRYLN2 20AMP DRY LN:Z Va"I Oven 110VAC ORYLH2 Pl/AC 110VAC l'VAC ORVLN2 · @-Test Equipment -lnsitu Ory Boxes @-··ryBoxes .>i313CTOW 08Et>I£t,09L ccum Bake Oven neral Workbench y Work Microscope st Ribbon Bonder NEW 1-HOUR CORR. O}[] I I I I I I I I I I I stbond Wire Bonder i e Bonder (extra R&D) g0:e1 100z/60/g0 I (' EsGil Corporation ~n Partners/i.ip Wit/i. government for '.Buiuling Safety DATE: 2/7/01 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: '00-4807 SET: III CJ~NT CJ~ CJ PLAN REVIEWER CJ FILE PROJECT ADDRESS: 2075 Las Palmas PROJECT NAME: MODETEK, INC. T.I. D D D D D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for yo!Jr information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for t~e jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advi5i_e the applicant" that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax#: Mail Telephone Fax In Per.son D REMARKS: By: David Yao Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC 1/31 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858) 560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 EsGil Corporation 1.n Partnersliip witli (jovernment for 'BuiCaing Safetg DATE: 1/24/01 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-4807 PROJECT ADDRESS: 2075 Las Palmas PROJECT NAME: MODETEK, INC. T.I. SET: II D APPLICANT ~ D PLAN REVIEWER D FILE _D The plans transmitted herewith have been. corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. D The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. ~ The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. rg] The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Lund Vandruff 3970 Sorrento Valley Blvd. Suite H San Diego CA 92121 D Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. ~ Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Lund Vandruff Telephone#: (858)457-6860 Date contacted: 1 fzLf /01 (by:~) Fax #: (858)457-6862 Mail \.,.../Telephone D REMARKS: By: David Yao Faxc...--In Person Esgil Corporation ,i:gi GA D MB D EJ D PC Enclosures: 1/16 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858) 560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad 00-4807 II 1/24/01 RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 2075 Las Palmas DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY. ESGIL CORPORATION: 1/16 REVIEWED ·BY: David Yao ·FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-4807 SET: II DATE RECHECK COMPLETED: 1/24/01 \ This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws • regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. A. The following note should be given with each correction list: Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commereial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. . 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised. B. The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews. The original correction number has been given for your reference. In case you did not keep a copy of Carlsbad 00-4807 II 1/24/01 the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding corrections. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items. C. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? DYes ONo \ Carlsbad 00-4807 II 1/24/01 2. All sheets of the plan shall be signed by the person responsible for their preparation. + PLUMBING, MECHANICAL AND ENERGY CORRECTIONS + PLAN REVIEWER: Glen Adamek . 1. Each sheet of the plans must be signed by the person responsible for their preparation. Business and Professions Code. All sheets are not signed and the state license numbers of the persons signing the plans are not shown. ENERGY CONSERVATION \ 4. On the plans clearly show the floor, wall and roof insulation locations, thickness, and R-values, as per the energy design. The ENV-3 forms showing the insulation values are missing. And the plans do not show the insulation. 5. The corrected, completed and signed ENV-1, L TG-1, and MECH-1 forms must be imprinted on the plans. A) The ENV-1 part 2 of 2 is missing from sheet M-1 and the Envelope Designer must sign the ENV-1 form. B) The MECH-1 part 2 of 3 and MECH-1 part 3 of 3 are missing from sheet M-1. C) The L TG-1 and L TG-2 forms on sheet E1 .2 are incomplete and not signed by the Documentation Author and the Principal Lighting Designer. Please correct. Note: If you have any questions regarding this plan review list please contact Glen Adamek at (619) 560-1468. To speed the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans. ·EsGil Corporation 1.n Partnersliip witli qovemment for '13uitaing Safety DATE: 1/4/01 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-4807 PROJECT ADDRESS: 2075 Las Palmas PROJECT NAME: MODE'l'EIC, INC. T.I. SET:I CJ PLAN REVIEWER CJ FILE D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected wf:lere necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. D The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. ~ The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D _ The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdict-ion to forward to the applicant contact person. cg] The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Lund Vandruff 3970· Sorrento Valley Blvd. Suite H San Diego CA 92121 D Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. ~ Esgil Corporation staff did advis~ the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Lund Vandruff Telephone#: (858)457-6860 Date contacted: 1 f sf o, (by: {--A.;9 Fax #: (858)457-6862 Mail ~ephone Fi:i>L.,/' In Person D REMARKS: By: David Yao Enclosures: Esgil Corporation [8J GA [8J MB D EJ D PC 12/21 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858) 560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 '- .. Carlsbad 0C>-4807 1/4/01 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST TENANT IMPROVEMENTS PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-4807 OCCUPANCY: B/F-1 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V-N ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA: ? . SPRINKLERS?: Y REMARKS: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION:. DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED: 1/4/01 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): JURISDICTION: Carlsbad USE: office/manufacture ACTUAL AREA: STORIES: 1 HEIGHT: OCCUPANT LOAD: .DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 12/21 PLAN REVIEWER: David Yao This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and acce~s for the disabled. This plan review is based on. regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Code sections cited are based on the 1997 UBC. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck. process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up_ list when you submit the revised plans. TENANT IMPROVEMENTS WITHOUT SPECIFIC ENERGY DATA OR POLICY SUPPLEMENTS (1997UBC) tiforw.dot ,-; Carlsbad 00-4807 1/4/01 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new complete sets of prints, to: Esgil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite #208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. 2. Plans and calculations shall be signed by the California state licensed engineer or architect where there are structural changes to existing buildings or structural additions. Please include the California license number, seal,, date of license expiration and date plans are signed. Business and Professions Code. 3. Provide a statement on the Title She.et of the plans stating that this project shall comply with the 1998 edition of the California Building Code (Title 24 ), which adopts the 1997 UBC, UMC and UPC and the 1996 NEC. 4. Provide a note on the site plan indicating the previous use of the tenant space or building being remodeled. Section 106.3.3. 5. On the first sheet of the plans indicate: • Present and proposed occupancy classifications of the remodel area, 6. Provide a note on the plans indicating if any hazardous materials will be storE?d and/or used within the building which exceed the quantities listed in UBC Tables 3-D and 3-E. 7. A complete description of th.e activities and processes that will occur in this tenant space should be provided. A listing of all hazardous materials should be included. The materials listing should be stated iii a form that would make classification in Tables 3-D and 3-E possible. The building official may require a technical report to identify and develop methods of protection from hazardous materials. Section 307.1.6.(Are there sqme. hazardous material storage areas? H-2? What kind of lab? Any hazardous materials to be used? H-3?) 8. Note on plan that suspended ceilings shall comply with UBC Tables 25-A, 16-0 and 16-8. 9. Glazing in the following locations should be of safety glazing material in accordance with Section 2406.4 (see exceptions): a) Fixed or operable pan~I~ adjacent to a door where the nearest exposed edge of the glazing is within a 24-inch arc of either vertical edge of the door in a closed position and where the bottom exposed edge of the glazing is less than 60 inches above the walking surface.(W-1) Carlsbad 00-4807 1/4/01 10. Specify lever-type hardware for passage doors on floors accessible to the disabled. Title 24. 11. Note on the plans: ,;All exits are to be openable from inside without the use of a key or special knowledge." In lieu of the above, in a Group B, F, Mor S occupancies, you may note "Provide a sign on or near the exit door, reading THIS DOOR TO REMAIN UNLOCKED DURING BUSINESS HOURS." This signage is only allowed at the main exit. Section 1003.3.1.8. 12. Regardless of occupant ·toad, a floor or landing not more than 1/2 inch below the threshold is required on ec;1ch side of an exit door used for disabled access (may be 1" maximum where not used for disabled access). Section 1003.3.1.6. 13. Corridors sha!I have interior door openings protected by tight-fitting smoke and draft control assemblies rated 20 minutes. Doors shall be maintained self-closing or be automatic closing by action of a smoke detector per Section 713.2. Doors shall be gasketed to provide a smoke and draft seal where the door meets the stop on sides and top. Section 1004.3.4.3.2.1.(N-13 for storage 157?) 14. Total area of all openings, except doors, in any portion of an interior corridor, shall not exceed 25 percent of the area of the corridor wall of the room which it is sepatating from tl,e corridor. Such openings shall be protected by fixed glazing listed and labeled for a fire-protection rating of at least 3/4-hour. Section 713.9.(W-4 for storage 157?) 15. Duct penetrations of fire-rated corridor construction shall· have smoke and fire dampers per Sections 713.10 and 713.11. 16. Jf a room with an exhaustfan has a door opening into a rated corridor, show how makeup air wi!I be provided to the room. The door cannot be undercut, nor can a louver in the door be provided. Section 1004.3.4.3.2.1. 17. Provide a note on the plans stating: "Penetrations of fire-resistive walls, floor-- ceilings and roof-ceilings shall be protected as required in U8C Sections 709 and 710." • -MISCELLANEOUS 18. The size of the existing roof beam 824, 826 shall be specified on the roof framing plan. 19. Provide calculation to justify the unistrut framing and connection details. 20. The H-6 occupancy is not part of the permit. All code requirements related to H6(area analysis, occupancy separation, service corridor, .. etc) are not reviewed. 1 t'J Carlsbad· 00-4807 1/4/01 21. The following are soil-relc1ted items: a) Provide a copy of the project soil report prepared by a California licensed architect or civil engineer. The report shall include foundation design recommendations based or:1 the engineer's findings and shall comply with UBC Section 1804. · _b) In Seismic Zone 4, each site shall be assigned a near-source factor. Identify this value in the soils report and on the plans. Section 1629.4.2. c) Specify on the four:1dation plan or structural specifications sheet the soil classification, the s·oils expansion index and the design bearing capacity of the foundation. Section 106.3.3. d) Investigate the potential for seismically induced soil liquefaction and soil instability in seismic zones 3 and 4. Section 1804.5 e) Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading .plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soil report are properly incorporated into the plans. (When required by the soil report). f) The soils engineer recommended that he/she review the foundation excavations. Note on the fquridation· plan that "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building Department foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the building official in writing that: i) The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report, ii) The utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and iii) The foundation excavations comply with the intent of the soils report." 22. Please refer to the following corrections for mechanical, plumbing, energy and electrical items. 23. To speed up the review process·, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. 24. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from thi~ !jst. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them ar:1d where they are located in the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: Carlsbad 00-4807 1/4/01 Yes O No 0 The jt,irisdiction ha$ contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; teiephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact David Yao at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. . + ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW + 1996 NEC + PLAN REVIEWER: MORTEZA BEHESHTI 1. Show on the single line the available fault current (lsc) from the utility co. 2. Equipment ground wire to "ATS 1" and "El-1" are undersized. NEC 250-95 3. Specify feeder and conduit size for the existing panel "A". 4. Submit load calculations. Include long continuous loads (LCL) and the largesf motor loads. NEC 220. 5. Indicate the total load demand on the service. 6. Provide physical barriers for the service. NEC 110-17(b) 7. Specify the dimensions of equipment rated 1200 amps or more. NEC 110-16(c). 8. On sheet E3.1, correct location for panels "OP1" and "OP2". NEC 384-4 9. Provide GFI protected receptacle(s) within 25 feet of HVAC equipment. NEC 210- 8(b)2 & 210-63 10.' Each commercial building and each commercial occupancy accessible to pedestrians shall be provided with at least one outlet in an accessible location at each entrance to each tenant space for sign or outline lighting system use. NEC 600-5(a) 11. Note the following requirements on the prints for panel boards supplying fire alarm equipment: Lockable cover, identified circuit breaker. (red), and a breaker "lock-off'' device to be installed. · 12. Include the following-specifications on the single line diagram when utilizing a four pole ATS: The grounding electrode, cqnductor size, and the neutral bond at the generator (NEC 250-26), and both required signs installed at the service. NEC 700- 8 (a & b) ,J Carlsbad 00-4807 1/4/01 13. If utilizing a series-rated system, note on plans: "Overcurrent device enclosures will be identified as series-rated and labeled in accordance with NEC 110-22" and "The overcurrent devices shall be AIC rated per manufacturers' labeling of the electrical equipment". Note: If you have any questions regarding this electrical plan review list please contact Morteza Beheshti at (858) 560-1468. To speed the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans. PLUMBING, MECHANICAL AND ENERGY CORRECTIONS 1. Each sheet of the plans must be signed by the person responsible for their preparation. Business and Professions Code. 2. Provide data on proposed hazardous material to be stored and used. UBC, Section 307 and UFC. · a) Clearly show types of hazardous material is being stored or used. Provide a list of the proposed hazardous materials as per the types in UBC, Tables 3-D, and 3-E. Provide the material safety data sheets (MSDS). b) Clearly show the amounts of each type of hazardous material to be stored and in use. c) Clearly show whe.re in the buildings ·each type of hazardous material is being stored or used . . 3. . Provide complete water line sizing calculations, including the water pressure, pressure losses, water demands, and developed pipe lengths. UPC Section . 610.0 and Appendix 'A'. 4. On the plans clearly show the wall and roof insulation locations, thickness, and R-values, as per the energy design. · 5. The corrected, completed and signed PERF-1, ENV-1, L TG-1, and MECH-1 forms must be imprinted on the plans. Note: If you have any questions regarding this Plumbing, Mechanical, and Energy plan review list please contact Glen Adamek at (858) 560-1468. To speed the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans. ' ' END OF DOCUMENT , Carlsbad 00-4807 1/4/01 VALUA tlON AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-4807 PREPARED BY: David Yao DATE: 1/4/01 BUILDING ADDRESS: :2075 Las Palmas BUILDING OCCUPANCY: l3/F-1 .. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V-N BUILDING AREA V~luatiort .Reg. VALUE PORTION (Sq.Ft.) Multiplier Mod. T.I. 17368 per city Air Conditioning Fite Sprinklers, TOTAL VALUE Jurisdiction Code cb By Ordinance Bldg. Pennit Fee by Ordinance l•I Plan Check Fee by Ordinance Type of Review: 0 Complete Review D Structural Only D Repetitive Fee 3Repeats Comments: D Other D HourJy I Hour(s) * Esgil Plan Review Fee ($) 486,304 486,304 I $1,975.581 $1,284.121 $1,027.301 Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue.doc Sent, By: ISO STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS t 'I • . 619 696 0877; Jan-11-01 5:59PM; Page 2/2 "' -------~· -... __ ... ... _____ Nf.QJJETEI< OD 5f Project Job No. Sheet CML.5BAD .. CA- subjec:t > ~--Cale. l::11-0t Date Integrated Structural: [)~sign -4-40 Bttt<:h·$!tol!P.1. ~uilP. #201. Sen Diego. Calitornla 9210t 619.696-0866 . . . ' RESPONSE 70 CJTi,. Fl,4N Cf-lEL:K_ CDMtV'JENTS f1 /N4£ +7 • --i:---~------------i~; ~:~-------£) WL. · . : . "{£.)COL, fil :r.. .,.. ,...._ H-C, :l C:,-Co. C-l...-f•t.0-i..t:' . I ~ : e. D :t-. 4D'--o'' • • ,,__, ___ , .. ,.,_, ... ,-·" ,_ ....... •--• .,.,. • ••••·-··"~ .... ••••••-··-·-·-····-···-.. ··-······-m--~-·-•·w--•,.-•,r•- • . -s-1/B X 14 C,LB f ) ¥> t f ® \ I cij tOL -9i5 tit-G-~ H-S I'?, SU :~-C. SH, iFEJ-Elo( l::ATE-b 1-11-01) FOR ,UNISTR..f.ff FP...fjN:'J/NCi t;,-CONNECTION· DETAIL'S. . . ! . . : : I . 11(£) ~ ~1tc.). REGUIR.t.b INFORMATION ADDED S~E /~()l1NDA1t0N NOT£ # l. ? =1t4. : : :. .. :• ~: Sent By: I~D $TRUCTURAL ENGINEERS j t I , , • ~ 619 696 0877; Jan-11-01 3:22PM; ;. TNDE.X i...._· Prolect .. J)OSf Job No. Cale, 4'40 Beech Strtlll, Suite lf201. San Diego, California 92101 M{)t)E;.TEK ( PHAS~ l) 2015 LA-S. PltlMflS . . CARLSBA·b/ CA ~.100~ .ST!<<J. C.Jll 12/-1 L CALCS Page 1 Al Shaet /J..-(8-00 Da!r-11-Of 619.696--0866 Al -/l:2. i coVt.R SHEET )' FRO]f.CT l)ESCR..!PTION .. : Bl --:BI 3. I A-bJ:)L FR/,M!Nur 1 LAE:s AR.EA E-e,·G-..5-7 ,. Cl ·:cil ,'90L.UMNS. ~ /=OOTINqs . DI -:t:,)+ . ·/2e.TA-ININ.C? W1l-lL@.. RAMP . : ~ ----.. ... ~y ..... --.'Y-....---......... -·-... -..... ",,,, ..... d ....... ,~,,···----· .......... _ ...... ---· ...... ,~.,····-·-...... -~,,,..,-~·...._ . .-·-:·--.... ~ ,.,.~..-"""'-. .. , " I/ \ .... ~I .;_ Ell) ! UNIS7Rlf!_FRA~IN4 ~ -t-IS~Jt -J/-o/ '····-'"-,,.,,.~ .... _____ )·-.,.,,~.~~-;---···! ..... ______ ....................... , .... '/': ---~ .. -·-., . -., .... ~,/ ............... ~ ... ·• I I : ' : : : : : .~ : ,, . ' -' . . . : : : : . . -I, . ·· .. ,\-. /·;-' ..... ? .·· .· .. ·.· ,· .. it!/.·: : .• ; . ,, ·, .. : Sent ,By-: ISD,. STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS j . 619 6!;)6 0877 i J ,I ' Jan-11-01 3:22PM; Page 2 ) . . MOI>ETE.I< 005} EJ -''••····--Pioject Job No. Sheet '--· l/NISTR.fJT EMMI Nii l-fl-0 I Subje«:t -. Cale. t>ate Integrated St~uctur~I ~esign ••o BeoQh Strett, Sulit #201, San Diego, Collfornlo 92101 619 6;tl·0866 J:fNISTR..UT,_.fRfJMINq_. ( SEE DW-C,. # ;2.-S4) : : Ltr?.DINy ~: µNl5TR..itT FR.AM/Na -/. o P.SF . . . . [ f/ANCi ER. 1 ·BRfJCJNq ETC. := / , 15 : ALUMINUM 612.ID -2.. 2S ~ G, t> . . /-IEP/1 FILTEPS~ l.lC,f-f TS . . ' }AECII.,, DllCT.S ETC.. -4l 0 iTOTftL --15 · o UNISTR.llTi P/btJ I ~ 4-~'· . ·-""'""' ..... PSF Sen1 By:_ I-&D STRl,JCTURAL ENGINEERS l '.l • • 619 696 0877; Jan-11-01 3:22PM; Page 3 \,_, . . . . . : : ! _ Mf5DETE.K 005/ EJ... Project Job No. Stteel -....>_ .. ___.. -'--~<::+::~: \ 1. Integrated Stf'.JJCturjll ll>esign : I ~ SvbJtcl Calo. •co~ Sir~. Sulw 11201, San Diego, California S:Z101 61S,6SG-086G : ; ' ~ · lJNlSTR.lA[ j P!~OO @ 4~'' --· ---·-···~'= ... ---·-....... :::J::!':"2'""...:-..:r.:::::;:i::~~'l:of,:-,;x.~ ... ,'-¥._-4 ... ,:;~...:.-:.~ .......... . . . . . . . pf(l)tJttjEs/ ·iu,r. 1312.ACtNQ TO C.0Mf. FLANGE (Jf ,{)NISTRW:T! P/Oo I . · . , ft~t{~P,$-( .UN IS T RUT :i..-Pl Oo O @. B!o'' N/AX) HANCieRi l TRANSf~ THE C,l<AVIT~J LDAb FR.CM llNJsif:-c/71 r£AMINc-.,( ~ 1!:/--<o'1J ro NEUJ P1JoF FR-PJM!NG, I MEMt3cR (·3J12''x/G 11 PfV<ALLAM) . I ; : l :Z-Y2. t ~~LT' ~ ~><~BO i I = . l C.,CoD it, : : l-·1AN(r~ L{f~~ --l5 >c 4 )< B • ! = 4BD * < l%0-1t {JJ<., _j-_ · L /TAJ::, C4FAb!;y ~ 'f' / ':i ')_(; I GJN.NE. C.T I ()N ~ --¾ : : I # 1/= _-::: ;2. ><) S~or. =-/000 > 1-60 . Q1<!.. : ! : : NDTe =· ALUM~NuM cl3tD · . ~ /j~U:JVl!Nt,IM ·C,RtD HANCiER.S ~y 1Df7HeRs . : : ; . . ' . . : _o..J -... J ----3½ ,<./C:, ½.''c/7 tl(Jt., T. f'(OOO _ __, _____ ,. _______ , .. _ ( PIODI . Sent By: ISO; STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS I • .l ., • • • 619 696 OB77j Jan-11-01 3:23PM; . . . ' : . 005/ PrOjeCI Jab No. .,._.. Su~-Cale. 441> eeecn SlrNI. Suire ,201. San Diego. California 112101 . : SEISMIC / t N-S Pl~.) .... .,_ -~: rp F r Page 4 E3 Shtel Dete 619.61111-0866 Sent By: I&D STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS J..' ] ' •• 619 696 0877; Jan-11-01 3:23PM; Page 5 M~TEK 005/ E4 Projeet Job No. Sneet Subject Cale. Dale 440 f!etcl'I S1rea1. Suite #201. San Diego, Calitornia 92101 SE/SMJ:C £jy.J DIR . .. , _____ ,,._,,,. _ ....... l • • ....... ,. __ , __ ,:;:_ < ., , ' ; ' . 31/2. X f (p ~fARALLAM 7-· '•'•' ,·~-..... ·--·-;: d) --'V J I € .. ~ :1 . . ~--... 1 ' -------:(()·-·--·-------~~---···-· f/000 i E,SIDE 11~* ~- SEISMIC fO,~CC -== o. 37 x /0 >< 3J. - M =: 1rF?l>< ;i;c; ;:_ 3o~f :tt 1N.. SHE:!tR.j ,B6Lt 3o~4/c; _ £/Ci*< ~ 60 # COMBINE.bl SHEAR. • : ! --4ro/fi~c;o t-51~/0;BO ~ a:. 24 + o · S3 ==-o. 77 < I• 33 . ~ i ' al<. 619.6911•0866 Sent By: I~D STRUCJURAL ENGINEERS '. !· I 619 696 0877; Jan-11-01 3:23PM; r.P~'i. %"1~1¾" rw.t..J J .915" 1%" .+---··· I L .110~ Pierced channal~·are fotlnn ~n pages 60 and 61. ' . ' :, Weigh!: 190 Lbs/C Fl (283 kg/100 m) P1001 2 Weight: -380 Uls/C Ft (566 kg/100 m) BEAM L:OAO• : : ; 3500. . [ i' . I . I I : 31t() t" '~ I ! !· . ·~ l . i :>~. ······-··· \. . . . ........... .. ! ~ ,' ···---··-. \ Ii· ....... ·--·-·r···· .. . ':• "' . ' 0 il...N 'I, . ~ 1Suu ·r .... · , ..... ·· -·· · · · ~ i· ' . . ........... .,,.. i : 1000 . : I -... 1 ..... __ '!:l . . : ~ ;· ·....... {·--11---.,:'--·"1'---n-i i S;DO' ··-·r··--·---·-I I l : -~-·1·-1r-'-·1.-·-o-. ...l, . , . --............ -·---I j-o. .. ........... i 1 i .... , .... r-~ -..... r·.,=:--·" ··-r I I , .. -P1000 .._,__ P1001 r 'Maximum a!IQwabl~ unlforin!lo;a~. 24 36 4A 60 72 64 96 108 120 132 144 156 168 ·( 80 192 204 216 228 240 SPAN (In) .. ; I AloW11bl• Materl11I. $t..-.d11rd Wef,ht f Momtnt Thlokn .. • Lengths Flnlsh11 Channel , ; I• l))f./Ft /k~: ln•LI> N-in In mm 10' 20' PL GR HG PG P1000 tl;90"i : 218 =tf.tijf eo\ 570 ::::;;105-i;; -2.7 • • • • • -P1001 4\!ff;SQ/( : 5l1 lititi~~: 1630 i~r:i'~;,} 2.7 -• ----Nomin!lltt\lckness or: t2 ga~ i;trl~ ~,.-1 I~ .1.05 lncfles. : i I .. ~· : t ' ;· ;. 2 Page 6 Other Materials ss EA ---• • Sent By: ISO,, STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS 'l 619 696 0877; Jan-11-01 3:23PM; Page 7 /11 P1000 &, P 1 10~ 1 1 ~HANNE-LS ,. ff: FOR 1 (.i, II f\.1) \. l),...., Sf:Hll::S L f--,\NNt::L v,,.,.,, B~~M LC),ADI~~ l)ATA ' ! ·MH, Allowable DeU.ctlon ·at Uniform Loading at Delloctlons ---s-pa_n __ -t. Ctiantf 1--U_n_lfo_rm-r-_t.· o_a_d-11--U_n_lfo_nn...-L __ 0_11_d-1_.....:Sp:....a.,n1r-1_11_0_-+ __ s_P_•..,n~l2_4_0_-+ __ s...;p ... a.,.nl3_6_0_-t In . ~ ,. Lbs kN lri ffll'! Lbs kN Lb1 kN Lb& kN }1~~r • "!'•• 91:4 12(9 182;9 2134 4671 548~ P~oop P;oo~ : l Pt~ PJOO~ : : . p~~ P,00~ Pioc,J; P~001 : i PiooO P1001 PiOOO P10D1 : :. p~C>04 P~OOi: ' . •- 'Load limited by s'101 weldf &hil~. Notes: · f i· . \ t!!' • ;.~1,, I t ;. 7.5 . ·J69tf" 7.'.> 13.9 ?i~1i~~;j 13.9 3.4 .:· .510 . 10.7 ··.2400 . , .. . ,,. 2.~ i_'.';fa( a.s ··:1.eso· .·· ;,". 1.s . ·y~o;,· 7.1 ;)130 ., 1.1 "\.170 5.5 ... ;:830 0.8 4.2 0.7 100.· 3.3 500 0.5 1 .. ·Jio,.. 2.7 .. :~10 0.4 , .. 60, 1.9 ···2a0·, 0.3 ·:,,<''40/, 1.4 ::·:210:·: . :~::~:-~ ·::··~.· · . 0.2 ..... NR" 1.1 '.Yi:~60:;i· . ,'• .· .. 0.2 , .. i··NA ' ...... 0.8 ;,'.;130 •. 1: NR .:l')l,R. .. 0.7 .' .,po 7.5 13.9 4.0 13.9 2.3 10.7 1.4 7.3 1.0 5.0 0.8 3.7 0.6 2.8 0.4 2.2 0.4 1.8 0.3 1.2 0,2 0.9 NA 0.7 NA 0.6 NR 0.4 NR ., Not llecommendeu 1. Abo11a loads lflqlurtlt! lheJ mtbtit·of the mP.mhP.r. Thill Wl!lght must ba daducletJ 10 arrive at lho n.et el1Qw11blt.t load th!' beam will suppon. 2. Long $p11n b11ari,s ahouii:, bfi!:11upport11d In &\,lch ll 111&1\IMlr as.to prevent rotation .ind lwi!II. 3. AIIQwable unilo~ly dis!~butf:tf loads are li&led-lor 11ariou& &jrnple spans. that Is, a bf.'!:tm on two !lupports. II load Is coocontrated al lhe cimlar of the SJ)!ln, multiply l?ad from tho 1ablc by 0.5 and CQrreliporiding deflection by 0.8. 4. Se~ f'IIISJP, fi6 for; IBIP.fAI ~rar.(n9 l0Rd (A(ftl(lllon r.hAflti . • . . 'i !' tJ..-,. .......... " ............. ~··--·--- Sent By: 1$0 STRUCTURAL ENGINl;ERS • • • Unb111clld : • Height : In .. KL r>:.100 2438 27~ - C P~oob P~O~ ' : . P~o® P~00;1 : ; .. p~~. ,~oo,1 : : P~oop P:100~ : :, ,. e·LEMENTS Of ~~CTION Chan~I · ·p1000 P10b1 ,. : : :· 1 :. r ' ' .. , .AreHof Section 619 696 0877; s 1-Moment of Inertia Jan-11-01 3:24PM; Axl:s 2-2 r s In' cm• PageB/11 40.5 100.6 28.9 91.0 19.7 17.7 14.a 60.5 11.8 42,6 9.6 31.3 8.0 23.9 •• 18.9 .. r S -Section Modulue r -Radius of Gyration • Serit, By_: !SQ STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS 1 . ., !319 696 0877; Jan-11-01 3:25PM; Page 9/11 "r ~· LATERAL aiRlc,NG LOAD Reoucr,oN cHARTs : ! ' i ~ 100 ~.,ffi-J,.~ o " r.. 90 I ~-~~l~J"-Lf r.-f~:-\ Q ao _j ..• ; . ~::·-···~R,:~:J!~.;:7~1!~-=-~t---r·--.•. -:-_.,. UJ I . .. ,,.. '·11. I !' ···-11-~ . . : .: l. . I ··-··'!'-······ 1 ··-i;,. ··11 < 10 . .. .... . .. , ............. •·· · I lu i : ' :1 :. '+---! 1 ···· ·---.•..• ~ 60 '. -:1 r1 .. , ... ~.-·-·~·-, .. _ l .... ~-., 9 '! i • \ , ·••·•··· ! ~ so : . -w--l--p1" ooo.. ' : · 1· ·•-......... l ~ . . . '\• .... " -it 4D : .. l'l·j P$000 f·,, · .. 3: . . . . ' ' g ; . -'; P~300 ! (-·, ..... -;I. 30 : : ··-..:-t-P,ooo . i · · ;-Y-···· ·~>-. _ ..;, t : •lP$500i ': I ·1 ~~ 20 : -,,-{ P$ooo: ·· l l '. · •ii pri2 ~0; ! . l to 0 1: 'l • . j I ~ :~ J.~.oo ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ l· Ul$TANCE (In) BETWEENLATERALBRAC~S j !: : . 100 I :.:lr--":· ·.~~ ,,1· . :~. ! :.··--i ! J ~ ·1 !lO I ; .... \ ~--. ==::w,. I : .... ·.. 1 .., ...... ••• I -. ·-.... · : . .._ ' I •,. t,, ~,-,_,... I ...-. 1 : : "·, <,., ! . -.. , I.,.,. ····v.. I p so I . .. .;.. ... ; .... ,._... 1.\. ·, • ...:·,,o ~ I i I : ! ............... l '·, ...... ::·1 ... ~.• e 70 • .. .; ... , . : • .... . .· r· ~ . -J . 0 ~ 60 (·. \ . \ . . .............. ::::, I : j 50 : : iii : _,. -4-P~CKJl . i 40 -o+ P,001C41 g ---•+ Pi301 ;i! 30 _ ... ; ... ,i PI001 LL --f P~1 ~ 20 : 1,-t· P5501 : '~ P;004A ': ; h' 12 :2~---~61 ·· : so n e4 96 1011 120 l !'. DISTANCE (In) BETWEEN lATl:f:IAL BRACES : I· . : !· !· ~- :' !. 100 11~~·\ .... I I I I I o ao I ~ \ ... ,,. ! I < 70 !''-'ii. I tu \~ ··, ! '',··+ ; . ~ 60 \~· t'-·····1--··· ... i I 0 ' \ '!l·-..• ~ 50 ·' · ! ·,.,,, I .... · ····· ! 40 ·[\ ·,·i··, ... ,.i,: ....... J_ ···1 0. . I •••• ~ 30 : I I u. : -·•-P1100 '-,." I I O 20 ' --<..'-P20DO 1 1·, .••. ·•~ : -•--P4000 '·1 !-.. ... , ,. 10 : ··:· P4100 l 1 ······i1 0 ... ) .. -)._.. I , .. ___ .,_....... i l I 12 :>4 ~fi 48 60 72 84 96 108 120 DISTANCE (In) 8ETWEEN LATERAL Bf'AC!;$ . 100 :--~-I T"'""I I I I i 90 ·--.:::¥"'-,..1,..,··,,. I . I .... ' : -~:·1••, ... I t ! ':.",:• :.:-:.'"'!:::: •.. I 0 80 . . "1: .......... 1. 'j l ••• :::::r•~:::::·l. -·-·r· .. -!, w -·,·1 ···, I ~ 70 ........... :.. .... · ''·····-;!,.-::.::::~ ~ 60 ... ..... 1' ~ i ~w ' .~ i -40 .... g ;/_ 30 .. ~ 20 i -•-P1101 --o--P2001 --+-P4001 ->-P4101 1: ._ ....... . I" .. l .. ····-...... . ·-· 1l! 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 108 120 DtSTANCE (In) BETWEEN LATERAL BRACES t ·t S•nt By: ISO STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS 6.1 9 696 0877 i . Jan-11~01 3:25PM; Page 10111 ,_, A ; ,. DESIGN LOAD DATA FOR TYPICAL UNISTRUT CHANNEl CONNECTIONS = L ~o·Ftttlnga (When uoed In posmon ahowr) Channel Thickness 1-2 ga. 14 ga. 16 ga. Lb~ 1300 1oop 75Q< kN . s:1 . 4.4 3.3 I LJ P1026 lbs kN I. d --'• P1325 P2235 Lbs kN 89 8.9 6.7 ..... l LOAD :_j • b I .L --·.:..=J '~ I ~ I Lbs P1458 P1579 kN 4.4 4.4 L.OAD . -:~---·:7 I !"Ct",..- -P1346 lbs kN 8.A 6.7 4.0 _ /: 9Ci• Fltttng.1.(Wh1n. uaed-ln po1ltlon ahown) Flat Plate fitting• Channel Thlckneis 12ga. 14 ga. 16ga. PI068 kN · Lbs , ,30(10:-: _ 13.3 /;,.,~-? Bolh ends of beam~ support.ad. j I· JcN lbs 2.2 2.2 2:2 kN LOAD P1346 -lbs ,-. ,,_,, ,:• 4•~1 ,' t~.' 2.2 :i::~tiOOit ,;,-.• ...... , .. • f kN 5.3 S.3 :;.:::;J•;,;;_~~~ 2.2 ,,•:·CIU(~1'_,, 4.4 LOAD J_-=-7 ~-~,;:_.d P1065 Lbs kN iJ~oo··--o-::· ,,,. ~ .. , . . ..·· 4.4 3.6 2.7 Load diagrams indJa1a up it lhr~e design loads, one for 12 !JiA!JG section& (P1000), one lor 14 gage sections (P1100). and one lor 10 gag~-sec1lon~ (P?OOO). ' : i Load dai.-la based~" P101b mit «~d ½'' bolt. . : . !-. Safety !actor= 21/t ~11se(! o~ ulli~ate strength of connection. : i I· . Sent By: ISD STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS 619 6960877; Jan-11-01 3:26PM; Page 11 / 11 •' .. JI I··- . . I . ' . I . . ' P1834 '• 1:%" \111.;l) Hequires ¼I" x 2 io'I!• eon and W Nut : (not,lrn:luded) ' :CHANNEL TROLLEY SUPPORT 1 Hole v;,~11 (i 4.3) Dia. ........... ---·-·-r .--~-. 3 o/'•" ttfri : ' : . f-.,.._ 1" .. >Jt95.:3) .. -· ____ 1 -:::>/ • 2 Holes 7/,c'' ( I I. I) Dia. ', See page 122 lo~ trolleys] !. (2SA) Design Load 1200 lbs (5.3 kN) P1843 WI/C :, 021Lh, (46.3 kg) /4oJtJSTA5~E HING!: CONNECTION ~-..... -., .. 2 ¼," (54.0) -~..:..J _,_ . . -2¼" (54,0) w11c:sa ,bs:(30.8 kg) ,. . I P5349 CURTAIN SUDER . . ID ,;, .. Wt/C ~.'5 ~b~ (2.9 kg) . ' : ; •1,. • Diarhat~r :14.3m1 i, j. De4ign L~d 20 Lbs (. f kN) '¥.•· (20.6 mm) From /:nd l'lll" (47.6 mm) On Center P1834 A CHANNEL TROLLEY SUPPORT Re11uirt1b ¾" 11 2 ½" Bolt anti ¾" Nul (not included) 1 Hole 9/ie" t 14.3> Ola. ..... -···· ----r· .-... 3¼" -···· :::] t'J~.)) ... -· __ l. ··' ----2 Holes , •. 7/is" ( I I.I) Dia. See page 122 for trolleys. 1" !2$.4) Oe&1gn Load 2500 Lbs (11.1 kN) WI/C 220 Lbs (99.8 kg) ADJUSTABLE HINGE CONNECTION 4" tl01.6) .. -:::.--:::::-:..-._~ .. / CJ..... :·: .. -~-... __ 4" __ .. ...>· -~;-.-..,...-(tul.b) ...................... --.... -" P1201 P1202 P1203 Part Number P1201 P1202 P1203 Wtdlh 1W 41.3 mm WI/C 109 Lbs (49.4 kg) "At' v .. ~ 6.4mm LADDER RUNG WelghVC kg 84.4 100.2 115.2 ' ,-,. •' . . . PLANNING/ENGINEERING APPROVALS ~ . P&l~n·-aa CB ap ··yeo7 .. RESIDENTIAL ·,RESIDENRM ADDfflON MINOR 1<$10,DDD.ODi . .. : • - . . . CAflsBAD COIIPANY STORES _ . • VILLAGE FAIRE COMPLETE ~FFICE ~UILDINC . OTHER ~ ·: Z, ~ (½hi~ . . , · PLANIIER _______ _____ DATE ------ < . ,·• -0 . . C"1 . -~ "' 0 >, .Q ~ ~ ~ C..l C "' c:: >, .Q "' =It ~ ~ C..l C .!!! 0.. ~DD i 1 • PLANNING DEPARTMENT BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST I Address aoJS L..4s Pa.\ma.S Plan Check No. CB001::iB07 Planner Paul Godwin APN: ~12> .. o, l • 1q~oo Phone 760-602-4625 --------------------------- / Type of Project & Use: Off le, I IY\ai'\u fqc:,+. Net Project Density: ____ ...;;;D;..;:U:;;.:../::...;A-=~-,-- Zoning: p .. rn-G. General Plan:_P-J:~--Facilities Management Zone:~5 __ _ CFO (in/out) # __ Date of participation: ___ ----'. Remaining net dev acres: __ _ Circle One \ / (For non-residential development: Type of land used created by this permit : ______ ____, ____________ ) i .. Legend: ~ Item Complete D Item Incomplete -Needs your action Environmental Review Required: YES __ NO _X_ TYPE ___ _ DATE OF COMPLETION: -----,----- Comp Ii an c e with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. )loo Conditions of Approval:--'-------'-------------------- Discretionary Action Required: YES APPROVAURESO.NO. ___ DATE __ _ NO X· TYPE ______ _ )ioo PROJECT NO.---'---------- OTHER RELATED CASES:----'---------------- Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval:-------------------------' Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance Project site located in Coastal Zone_? YES __ NoX CA Coastal Commission Authority?. YES __ NO__ , \ If California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact ·them at -7575 Metropolitan Dr, Suite 103; San"{)ifugo. CA 92108-4402; (619) 767-2370 Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt): Coastal Permit Determination Form already completed? YES__ NO __ { b .. l'; ,;; i,• r 1" !f:.N.O. -~or:r;iple.te~_COg&tal..P.EJr,fl)it) Qeterr;nir:ratioi;i iF.otm fl~-}V-.. _, . 1 .(. ~ .::. · • .} . :., , · ~ I_,. . ;_.~-+ .-~Q~~.tal.fermit p~~~(rqinatjori,;l;og p_i 'i ·r,.. k ~: r ~· i:, •• '.:. ·~ :. :-~. >: :t:7-. r-j • .) .,, • • I /I • ~ • ............. , ...,. ..... ,.. ... -l .~ .. . \_ ~) ..:,,J\ •J ;i • i • J .J .,,) (.',t J :-l!"\ ·~ • I / ...,, f { :,f j J. t>, "'·- Follow-Up Actions: • .. f , .. ? 1) Stamp Building Plans as 11Exempt" or "Coastal Permit Required" (at minimum Floor Plans). 2) Complete Coastal Permit Determination Log as needed. H:\ADMIN\CQUNTER\BldgPlnchkRevChklst ){DD ~DD DOD ODD lncl.usionary Housing Fee required: YES (Effective date of lnclusionary Housing Ordinance -May 21, 1993.) No.½_ Data Entry Completed? YES NO .:: ) (Aff.!ps~Act_il(-.it¥~air[l~~iiafip§~ enter CB#, toolbar, Screens, lfod&ingfeeJ>,~Construct Housing Y/N, Enter Fee, UPDATE!) r_.., Site Plan: ,_ -., r.:.; . : .. :~, · 1. Provide a fully dimensi9i:l~J:1s,i{e1.Pl~0-erewn to scale. Show: North arrow, property lines, easements, existing:_;,.:aJld proposed stq;1cJ4u~s·i, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way width, dimensional setbacks and existing topograph,ical 1 lines. . · "f .. , .. 2. Provide legal description of property and assessor's parcel number. Zoning: 1. Setbacks: Front: ,. Required _______ Shown ______ _ Interior Side: 1 • Street Side: Required Shown-------· , Required Shown ______ _ Rear: Required Shown ______ _ 2. Accessory strubture setbacks: . , . Front: Required _______ Shown ----,-----,' Interior Side: Required Shown ______ _ Street Side: Required·. Shown ______ _ Rear: Required Shown ______ _ Structure separation: Required Shown ______ _ D D D 3. Lot Coverage: Required _______ Shown ______ _ D D D 4. Height: , I Required ___ -___ Shown_______ ,, ' . ,• 5. Parking: Spaces Required _J~Z ____ Shown __ \_1>_'-/_. __ _ Guest Spaces Required Shown ______ _ OK TO ISSUE AND APPROVAL ENTERED INTO COMPUTERQt.LJJlJ, JJ-b DATE d-' ) 3 ·O/ H:\ADMIN\COUNTER\BldgPlnchkRevChklst G.a~bad Fire Oepartment 004807 1635 Faraday Ave. Carlsbad, CA 92008 Fire Prevention (760) 602-4660 Plan Review Requirements Category: Date of Report: 0212212001 Reviewed by: -----------Name: Lund Vandruff -----------------------Address: 3970 Sorrento Vly Bl Ste H City, State: San Diego CA 92121 Plan Checker: -------.---------,,a--,---Job #: _oo_4_ao_1 ____ _ Job Name: Modetek, Inc. Bldg #: CB004807 ------"--------------Job Address: 2075 Las Palmas Ste. or Bldg. No. D Approved D Approved Subject to 181 Incomplete Review FD Job# The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and / or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes and standards. Please review carefully all comments attached as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. The item you have submitted for review has been approved subject to the attached conditions. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or irn~tall improvements. Please resubmit to this office the necessary plans and I or specifications required to indicate compliance with applicable codes and standards. ' The item you have submitted for review is incomplete. At this time, this office cannot adequately conduct a review to determine compliance with the applicable codes and I or standards. Please review carefully all comments attached. Please resubmit the necessary plans and I or specifications to this office for review and approval. 1st 004807 2nd FD File# 3rd Other Agency ID I Req'uirements Category: Building Plan -.,. Requirement: Pending 05.14 Provide Technical Report To determine the acceptability of technologies, processes, products, facilities, materials and uses attending-the design, operation or use of a building or premises subject to the inspection of the department, the Chief is authorized to require the owner or the person in possession or control of the building or premises to provide, without charge to fhe jurisdiction, a technical opinion and report. The opinion and report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer, specialist, laboratory or fire-safety specialty organi;zation acceptable to the Chief and the owner and shall analyze the fire-safety properties of the design, operation or use of the building or premises and fhe facilities and appurtances situated thereon, to recommend necessary changes. Requirement: Pending 05.34 Smoke Fire Damper requirements Provide information on the plans as to how the smoke fire dampers are to be activated. , If they are to be activated by single station smok$ qetectors provide the locations of the detectors on the electrical plans. Also provide the state fire marshals listing sheet and the manufacturers cut sheets on the detector. Page 1 02/22/01 Carlsbad Fire Department 004807 1635 Faraday Ave. Carlsbad, CA 92008 Fire Prevention (760) 602-4660 Plan Review Requirements Category: Building Plan Date of Report: 01/09/2001 Reviewed by: ----------- Name: Lund Vandruff --------------------Address: 3970 Sorrento Vly Bl Ste H City, State: San Diego CA 92121 Plan Checker: ____________ Job#: _00_4_8_01 ____ _ Job Name: Modetek, Inc. Bldg #: ,-.c·so0480i'~ .......,.. ___________________ _ Job Address: 2075 Las Palmas Ste. or Bldg. No. D Approved D Approved Subject to -~ Incomplete Review FD Job# The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and I or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this.office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes and standards. Please review carefully all comments attached as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. The item you have submitted for review has been approved subject to the attached conditions. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. Please resubmit to this office the necessary plans and I or specifications required to indicate compliance with applicable codes and standards. The item you have submitted for review is incomplete. At this time, this office cannot adequately conduct a review to determine compliance with the applicable codes and I or standards. Please review carefully all comments attached. Please resubmit the necessary plans and I or specifications to this office for review and approval. 1st 004807 2nd FD File# 3rd Other Agency ID 1,, ., j Req_uirerrJ,fjnts Category: Building Plan Requirement: Pending 05.1'4 Provide Technical Report To determine the acceptability of technologies, processes, products, facilities, materials and uses attendil)g the design, operation or use ofa buiiding or premises subject to the inspection of the department, the Chief is authorized to require the owner or the person in possession or control of the building or premises to provide, without charge to the jurisdiction, a technical opinion and report. The opinion and report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer, specialist, laboratory or fire-safety specialty organization acceptable to the Chief and the owner and shall analyze the fire-safety properties of the design, operation or use of the building· or premises and the facilities and appurtances situated thereon, to recommend necessary changes. Requirement: Pending 05,34 Smoke Fire Damper requir ments Page 1 Provide information on the plans as -how the smo ire dampers are to be activated. If they are to 01/09/01 vide the locations of the detectors on the electrical ing sheet and the manufacturers cut sheets on the ~~f~ Carlsbad Fire Department 1635 Faraday Ave. Carlsbad, CA 92008 Plan Review Date of Report: 0110912001 ---------,---- Name: Lund Vandruff Address: 3970 Sorrento Vly Bl Ste H City, State: San Diego CA 921'21 Plan Checker: Job Name: Modetek, Inc. Job Address: 2075 Las Palmas Reviewed by: 004807 004807 Fire Prevention (760) 602-4660 Ste. or Bldg. No. . . . Laboratory use requires technical report.Verify .use or non-use of smoke fire dampers. -- 1'-1.,. •;, ' 'Project Subject 00:Sf Job No. Cale. Al Sheet I :i..-t B-oo · Date Integrated Structural Design 440 Beech Street, Suite #201, San Diego, California 92101 619.696-0866 PRDJECT: TNbEX Al -A2 Bl -Ball CJ c.:2 .. bl b:i.. .. MODE.TE k. . ( ?HASE. l) . 207.5 LA-S PALMftS CARLSB.ftb / ·CA ':?200':) :ST/<uC1UI2Al C4LCS COVER .SHEET 1 PRCJJE.CT bESCR.IPTIDN A-bC:L .FMM!N8r, LAS It-REA E-l::J·Co-5-7 ,~DL.UMN$. 9-fOCJT/NyS . ' . ·. /2.Ef A-I Nf N q <AJ7lL, L @_ RAMP ~' · .. ii. /<·" ·: :· . i 1' : . . . 1 • : • i ~ ~---· ~ . . .. •, •I • I -• .., j I ··-.._ e>QS/ Project Job No. Subject Cale. Date lnteg~ated Structural 'Design 440 Beech Street, Suite #201, San Diego, California 92101 619.696-0866 . . -.· PROJEG7 bESCl<IPT/0-N f,: ____ SCOPE (Sf ,IJS{)Rf< : 1. 1Hc EXISTING ON·e ..s_rtsRy cmc. T!LT-llf> .:S7R.UGTllR.E WITH _ ;oJtfZrD P!iNEl(=tED /2fJ{J!= S'(STEM -LWts {3UILT l('i I :;84~ ~. lt/2.f:ft. E-a-ai--s.:.7 .· f}UIMINUM· C,RI[) CEIL/Ny , (l'rbDL, LMb !O ?sr) IS Pf?f)U/bE.DfOR THE CLASS /01 (,){)0 CLEAN f:t]DM. A-bDL PLIR_LINS ( "'51/2. 'x I c,'' PA /?.A L U'J M). f'rR.t!:. P /21JU/ bEb f.=>E T IJ.Jf:eN THE. EXIST/Ny 4x /~=#; ?LIRUNS T() G4R.R~/ 7HE ) ( . A-Db L llJA-bS, FIVE -ADDL COLl/MNS PP..6l/lDE !NT, $,llffM.7 F6R.. THG EXJST!Ny N-S ,SE.AMS Ol'4 l!NE:..S 5 1 C, 9 7 ANb TH-l!S 1N.Cf2_Eft:3IN.t:~ Tf-lE U!J/tf) . . Clt?AG/1Y . OF THE BEAMS. -· . -AH-3 / A H-f . i'\ ·3, TvJ7J .NE.I)) lf-lR. MANDL~/<.. ( WT, 3300 -It EACH) NEAR l?:t-.G:> ) ? TWO NEtJJ CeJNl)ENSINC, .UNfTS( CU-3 1 . :Cll-4-/ ~T· 800 # E,4CH) NEA!Z. f-C, ARE ADDED, ... . . ! I I;. ;_)• 0--- 0--~- (§-----·-: 0--- b I ., ., b I b N ~ i 24·-o· 0 ~ 5HAt 61 ~ i ! ! tsa·-o· 24'-o· 24'-o· 2•·-0· ~ ~ ~ N N N ! 1 1 --~----------~,--------------= ------------~ ~ ~ (E) 0 (E) 0 ~ 1'.-·-·;.. ··.7! (E) 0 ~ (E) RTU-t ., ~ . : . ,/ ~ '·. : "' TOTAi. 6 ':I . , , __ --:-, , ~ r(E) SKYI.IG < · >-i ~ ~ .->f;i. j :::, 4'x8' (T't'P _WT • 340#_ IL .. -.::. --~ ------------+-~o,, . "'-------,-~,-------~------,..,,1-:-,,,..,.---=·L .. _ -~t . g () (N)'. ' --, I ---....... .,,,.,,. •. I . . N I \ , I tO~ _L' / .t__ -· ----~-~----------------~--,-t.:-::~~~<l--~, --=--~--~-~-;-~~-;;~;---;~c~---_(}-_;=--~-~-~------:--~-~--t.!-~:-rs-.~~~~-~-4 ---~ ---·-:· ·-·- (N) :-··-· -•• .J./=-i~-----··-··-··--1·-··-··J!J,,.J\,·-··-··-··fi ~---~ : ,' \ : b I b .. b I ,.. N --------------·•j: J g : . ~'--_'; :: N ~/---'~ J 55 : ~TYP. :: 1 I 11 : : . : S5 :: i-··82 ____ _{N)~:1flx16 PARALLAM-_ -:·811 •• J.N)J 1f2x16 PARAlLAM.,:.i (E·) 4x14 #1 (TYP.) , r, : J, _,"""-'-''-',-'-' ..... -=-------: . II : rr_-;.-:::-.:-.--==: .... .-: .. ! I II I 11· • 1 I : l:~ ··. / ___ J!~ ____ .J1!),tl1.~~!!.f.~~---4_812 ___ .Qll3 1/k!flJ'ARAlLAM · · :e w : : :;. ai ·ss ,,·· ,~~------------: : ~:--------;:~, --1'=:"'·=·"'·:.l·-"'·=71=_-,--------- (E) , : (E) l :: · ·, {E)· . ·-·-· I ··-·-·-·-·--------~-----·-· ,r. ·-·-·-··l~-r-,-·------,J---1---. -~-~-: ·-·-·-·-·-·-: ___________ ,~t-••-••-••-•·-J_813. __ (~l.3.l/2~6 ~f&w,X,_ i -: 84 (N)J;: 1/2x16 PARAU..AM : • 1J , ,/ f'. , : II I O • 11 •_," ',' : ~ «J :• I U m I 1: : : -:-~-f---i :, . . : ___ es _(Nlli_ 1flx16 _PARALLAM_ ...:.. 8t4 ___ J.N);L tfi,sjs PARAI.LAM _ l (N) ; (N) : :; -1.L=============:::::". .. J=---------------,i-••--.. •-•••a•••• 17"i-•••••• .. •••,,;....,..,,.• .. ~1 ~ .:: ~ :-!\ /;:: :, • 0 : I '/ f CD @----'-·:--·---(N) .-,,.. ·=--· ,, l1 I\ It I '.' I 0---- ©-------- ©------ ©-·-· b I b .. b ·' b I ~ . 9 ~ ___ .l~ ____ J.'!l~Ul:'<.!L~~~-~ _! . .l!.1.L .. ~lWl~P..f.~~---,a! -11 -I / \ 11 .._. ---------,-----::°' :: a, : ~'--_,;,: ia I I )( ~ I I ~~ !1 ~ : !: ~ lt'J -I w 6 ,c ~ ___ _!!? ____ ..(_N_l_~~tk.1.~.!.~~:~ ~1.L .. ~)~.J/.~~ • ..f.~~--..: $-. lll •• • • 'Ci\/• I •• • --------t..::=============~. ,: I '·· 9 : I / (El RTU-7 1: "' , 11 • x I ca: J: j /,.. ~~ : \ WT = 1060#1: e ~ jt I • • • I I --"+----------~----.. -.. lb~ ... )::---·· ,:l?J-~~;_;---JJ _________ _ I /\ I I 1 \ I ., ,. t" ---:I 88 (N)3 t/2x16 PARA!.~ .., 817 (N)3 t/2x16 PARAI.LAM N ,n 2 a, (E) (E) £ _. -·-·-·-·-· .SS ·-·-·-8· ------·-·-· __ ,_ _____ _ ___ _!!) _____ (N)3 1/2x16 PAAALLAM ______ _!1_1_~--(N)3 1/2x16 PARAI.LAM __ _ "' --·--·------------·-------------------------·-----L===========0--------r) l'' #090l • JH. , L-01!1 (3) I , .!:) ---NYllVlrt'd 9L•Z/l C(N) ____ / oQQ ___ , ~l' , __ '" ,-(~-~)-) '.: I . I "' I ... t-n:>-I "' ~---------J s ~ ~ ---~ ,, 1, ------------1 \ --I !·---------·-NYllVlrt'd 9l•Z/L C(N) I \ / I ,_., , ------:71 , I l'ff11\ll!Yd 9l•Z/l C(N) , , / I X : : ___ '_,_"--1--· 00g ...... ------·---------~---~ " __ ·, .:~-I -----t'i't'TMNd 9L•Z/L C(N)--: : Tr1r--~---_ i:---11 / ~-- , I· • c-n:> 11 ·' .,, "' , I ~ tt~-~-------.J s .:I ~ ' ,N C, 6i ,_, NYll\lllYd 9L•Z/L C(N) /\ :~: (~-' ------~/---'~ ,-, :~: -1=1-(N) r;::;__ ---~ 1· :·, I _·1 I· . I J, . I -------------------1~---. ----1--------1----' .. ·, ____ _ NYllVlrt'd 9 L •Z/ L C(N) I . I I I l'ff11Vlrt'd 9 l•Z/ l C(N) J,-' I I·', · I J.' I 1.-. __ ·. I I':· I I· . · I I, . , I I I 1·_,,_ · I I,_ I -------------... ,_."'"· . .....;;,---"---,I--,-. ----1-, .;;.._ .;... ____ .._, ----+---------- ' . I ___ t··_ -~-~' ," -_: __ 1,' _____ _ ------------------: ' . --~---' . l'!'(llVlrt'd 9l•Z/L C(N) J _-, ''. · . I I .. "·. ' ,t\4 4t, --e-----------··, i_-'·· ... .-· .. '-·-H+-· O~!..'c.... . 1·. I ,., .. -tt'·J (3) __J ~~-.LIA) 1 <3> 1 · ass -JH. ·, i:F (J ~~f. ,: ': '-~·.:.: L_-... -HY· I __ ,._-'--'--'------1-----+---------- I _, • ·' I ) ,r~_":::Y. ·.: _'_ -.. 1 1 i' __________________ C~~~i ___ -~~-12~___.;:~··. .1 l'ff11Vlrt'd 9L•Z/I C(N) L__ ~""_ ....... _ --------l'ff"l-~d-9-L•iil-,-(N)-- l'ff11Vl!'t'd 9 L•Z/l C(N) ----------:-0----0 (3) . _____ IDiQt ___ · ______________ _ l'IY11Vl!'t'd 9LXZ/L C(N) r<VTMNd 91•z/L C(N) l ~-----. ----------·· (v . -":'·-·:··~ ····-· ---o:--~--- J O· I .. ..... --------------------------~ ,, 005/ Project Job No. Subject Cale. lriteQrated Struct~ral Design ·. 4.40 Beech Street, Suite #201, San Diego,. Califo'rnia 92101 Roop lOADlt"1cS/ Roo.f l:N0 Y~/' PL ,wooD SUP->-PURl-lN 2x4 <3.21'' Pwz.t.. rN 4 x 14 -~ i'-o'' -=-13.-125 3/Fr / i.o' MGGH t G~I L.ING · Ml<:>c. = = = - ::: Ll 4.o l~-5 D. LOAD =- I.a D. LOAD :: L -LOAD ::. fOR. CL-~AN ROOH CBI LING SUPPORf fRAHIN6 DB:SfGN 51 Sheet /0 -30 -00. Date 619.696-0866 15 PSf !Co P:if :lo P5f ( l<BDU GI B~E ) uss Roof D. LOAD :::. IS -4 c HSGH t ce1 L1N0) = I l P5f <._ foR PURLIN D!;::>letN) AND /;2. Pof (::./Co-4) fOR GIRDl5R DB"'SIGN / -. . ~ .. -::: OOS/ 53 Project Job No. Sheet /(-/-00 Subject Cale. Date lnteijrated Structural Design· 440 Beech Street,. Suite #201, San Diego, California 92101 619.696-0866 CJ6AN ·RooH C.~lllNG l.-OAD UN \·01f2-\,I T ::: l.o P6'f r!ANGl5R ? HA!Z-D J---iAR6 t Ht$c. ::: 1.75 ,A\..UHINUl'-'I 61<-JD ;::_ J . .2. 5 -H5PA flLT15R / L.\6HT / AluHINUM Pl-ATB (AV.) = (j;_ 0 MC: GH ( DUG1S, PIPING . STv ') =-4.o -roTAL LOAD ::.. IS PSf J:' ~-HODE;f61<.. 005 / Project Job No. CLl:A1-.\ RooM C~IL1Ns Subject 6UPPORT ff<AMIN6 Cale. 84 Sheet II -I -00 Date lnteQrated Structural Design 440 Beech Street, Suite #201, San Diego, California 92101 619.696-0866 (_~) PURLlN 4x°i4#/ (T'(P.) -0DL-:: !\ ·P5f x. _S.o.' =· 88 ·4¼T -WLL = ( 4-t-20) 7--. 4_o 1 = ~(o 1/vr TOTAL-l--OAb : w:: BB t ~(p .= !Bf %T ~I * .p _ ioo * l3 ,5"B· (cLR.) ,_ , , ~·-00.SI Project Job No. Subject Cale. lnteQrated Structural Design 440 .Beech Street, Suite #201, San Diego, California 92101 BErAf'--1 B-/. -/3 I is ( N; puR LIN 31/2 11 >< f·G, PAf<Al~AM WDL = .-1 (p ½r + r 1 1-4 . · = · I G ->-4-f =-G o #/Ff W ::-:lCoO */Fr. p ) 1 { I ~ I --.1,.· ~' I I lS hlSDL. ( C~EAN RooH Go.ILi NG) ::-I .5 P5f x 8.o' = I 20 ½r WL.L :: ;).o P:>f x. 4.o' :: 3o '1r . 24 .. 0 foTAL. L.oAD : I ~ G,' Sheet //-I -00 Date 619.696-0866 4t= P= ;2DO J ;[ ~ ,I,. 3/ R ::3~42~ ~ uJ _= _ Q>o t 120 ·+ 3 o -=-~<;; o ¾r I\_= 21oo ¾r "2+/2 +J.Dox '?'/2+ + :ioo)( ~'2..f M ·= . 3' 2 2 ><. / 2 . 3 'J/2 . -::: f 6 ' ~ s I< . -3-22 k 12. 39 . . . -) ,, . ,, ,, j1/')_ X 14 J.O E PARALLAM P.SL ( TRUS JOIS[ t'·IAG MILL.AN) /I/,, °3;2 A ALLo0. 1':-1 = ~7-1~. k.' > r4. Bl k' ALL6L>J. V = 9.48 k ) ;2_.55 k $ )(. l':2.101-,23.t2) l 23.f2-" 12)3 6 ::. 32:>4' x. ~ooo x 800 t, . / (o J..O E PARALLAN-PSL s Y.. t1GOx 2 4 .) (. 14. x 12).:. :,84·><-2.000 X 1195 -=-0 -BI < .l/3(J;o (-=-0 -f O ) ,J OOS'/ Project Job No. Sheet· /1-3 -00 Subject Cale. Date lntewated Structural Design 440 Beech Street, Suite #201, San Diego, California 92101 (MoDiFIED) BEAM B.21 -Ct::) GL..I? sY~ x 191/;i. ( oN LINE 1 BGJ. f &_ ·0 ) A = L l(o + (151-9.31 ') t-(!Cox 5.3!')J x l4.o/1. k =: ';)(,89 ~ =-[ ( 12 t 4 t !Co) x 8.o x 24.o / 2 J + [ ( ! 2 .X 9. 32) + ( l(o x4.CDCo) J x Q.4 .0 / l ·= 3.ol+.J.:2.4"::. 5.~11<. P3 :=. [ l<P t ( IS:x 8.<t;<.o' )+ (ICiJ x 4.o)Jx 24.0/2 ~ c:,1_52k' BEAN 819-BJ.o NOT U5ED /~ 2,, , , ' t~' J" 3 5.31 4 3.1• 4 4.ol 4 l.99 o.bB /5.o' 13.o I P4 ~ [ ( 12 + 4 t I Co) ·x ~ .o x 24.0 / 2 J -t [ ( 12 x i .o) + ( I Cox 4 .o)] x_ 24.o / 2 -3.-01 + 1.9_2 ::: 4.99 k P5 -[ l<i> + ( IS x 8.o) t ( t(o x_ 4.o) J x. 24.0/2 =-2.40 k M1_2 =-11.04 k' Mi = -~I. 19 k' M2-~ = ! :2.b4" k' GLE> . sY~ ·x_ l 91/J. 6. = -0.09 // ,, 6 ::.. -0.04 !.2S M = 7<o.9o k' ) c?:1.19 k' BEAM 52.2.-l E) 6LE> sY8 A 24 .SANE AS BcAH B:2-(p 619.696-0866 le - 005{ Project Subje'ct· Job No. Cale. fl-::2-0O Date lntewated Structural Design 440 Beech Street, Suite #201, San Diego, California 92101 619.696-0866 BEAM 823 MODI Fl~O l_ E) c:>8"AM 51/2 ><-191/2 <:/ L/:J L-DAD fR6M (f:) Pu R LIN : { $6'& 5H. #= 6 ) . D L- (_ ~. ?O -1· I. I Co) loAD flZoM l"1 ) P~r:n,r--1 : D '-R.. :. 4. f 2 k · ( 3. 2 0 t 1.10 ) lo. ea·~ le-. · D L ·1<1 ;; ( l.4(p t 3.22 ) /r--. 4.01 ,_,, l 5.31 J 4' ~ :z. , 4' 4.of 4 0 0.2>1' .... -~ R2 -:. .;2.9. g5k ( ~l.00:> r 1b;/q) .J-7.o' , S.o 'II R~ = -9.o k (-Co.i7 -J .. -,~) M1-2 51. 35 k'. 6.1-2::. o.9o ,, -:::. .D L M 2. :: Ci,5.12 k.' GLE> 51/8 X 19½ L25 M = 1Co.9 kr > Cos.12 k' b =-o. 9o '' ( e.; 2 4o ( ~ !. 35 ~ ) I "- - OOSI Project Job No. Subject Cale. Sheet 11-2.-00 Date lnte~rated Structural Design 440 Beech Street, Suite #201, San Diego, California 92101 619.696-0866 BEAM )3.2.4 MoDtfltD (~) Bt:AH 5Y3 x 22h 0LB LOAD fROM . ( t--1 ) PLIR Lt"1 : ~-~2 I 4' ,._ O/i,.J 'i.Dl.. LL- P,_ :: [ l<o t liot ( 10x 4.o)}x ~4'= 4.tok ~ . DI-H!aCJl l-L.. P3 -= [(12+4tl<J,) x. 2>.o] x ~t'= &_141<. Ko P4 -.J -3 O k ( DL ) Ps = 3. :l Cc, k ( DL t 5 D L ) Peo -=--G,_;).l k. ( ~EE SH. if /_p) M'1 ::. 31.1& k/. N,-2.-=-14.10 k' M2 =-Cos.<o2. k-' J A 1.200 I/ L...::..C.ANT .:: k / H2-~ ::. .\o.15 ) .6. 1-2-:;_ -·0.14 ., I ,, ):: :: I VJOO k~, 1 -=-42>b"t. g lr--t 4 'I ~~2 1\ 4.oJ 4 4.ol 4 ,f.o/ 4 4.oJ 8.01 4_c;,3 ; l<-0.b(S I ..,~ <0./f; I ~3.5 1 -1 l(p_5_ . ~LE> s1/s x·' 22'l2 ) · L2S M ::::. loo.9o k' > 14.lo k 1 ._.,. OOS/ Project Job No. Sheet / / -). -00 Subject Cale. Date lntewated Structural Design 440 Beech Street, Suite #201, San Die~o. California 92101 619.696-0866 bSAM _ B25 :-HoD/f/E:D (e) 51/& x l11/:i. 6LB (_oN LINE S ·55f-E & G ) f<_f;T). L.. l-OAD == I Co P5f P1 :: 4-l~ k ( 06_& B 3) · g_ -:: 3.ol/<.. (0Sc B4) 3i P=i ;; [ ( !l+4 t IC:,) x. 8.o )\2,4/2] 0.b~ I t [ 32_ )(_ (o_O X 24 / 2 J -5 ~&k -- , P4 =-[. !~+ (!S )(. ~-.o)+ (!<ox4.o)Jx 24/2 -::. ~~4o k ~ r--' o.e:1-~ 1.34 4 4.of ' g_p I ,I\ l -5"31 i..5-~I 4 ;Jc [{°~' ~4-.01 11 'J.7.0 I 13.a' , P~ =-[(l2t4tl(p)x..9.32x24/2.J·+ [(12x.C/.32)t (/0)(4.~~~x 24/2 ;: 3.5& t J.;).4" = S.8.2. k pf() = [ 10 t ( lS "9.:>2 ) t (!Cox 5_"3/)] x 24 /2 = ~-89 k @) ,I\ 3 4 o.<o& P1 -[( 12.+4+ ICo )x 8.D x24/2J + [( l21-S.o)t(10~4.o)J x,24/2 = 4_99k ,,., -·. Hi =--39_ O(p k'. H2-~ = 14.Co2. k' 6.(,,6.tl T ::. 0. (o 3 11 --0.3() ,, ,, I 1.25 M· :: loo.9o k ) Coo.31 k..' I OOS/ Profect Job No. Subject Cale. lnte~rated Structural Design 440 Beech Street, Suite #201, San Diego, California 92101 .BE:AM B..2fu-( E) 5/& x. :24 GLB ( ON LINE 5 BST, 6 &_ H · R~D. L. LOAD -== (Co Pjf ~ = L ( l:t. t 4 + (G,)" ~-0 x .)A/ 2. J + [ (12 x g_o) t ( l<o x 4.o) J x :l4 / :2. ::: 4. 99 k /" I 3.33 -r ,r, l 4 4.01 4 4.o( .I/:(, 3.2.~ ~3;5o' B-1¾ tc Sheet . 11-3-oo Date 619.696-0866 /" 3 8.~l 4.b3 , . l1o.s' ri::: I 1ep+ c 15x -8.o')t (1<ax4.a)Jx24/2. R1 = :s.1&k. Ri =-.'.l.25~), R2.::. ~ . .22. k. = '1..40 k. P;, = [(11+4+1eo)"xS.ox24/2]+ [c12t4-treo)x<o.ox24/2]= 5.38>k M1_2 =--t41.12 k'_ 6 =--0.34 ,, Hi. = -48.01 k' t--12-3 .. 1~-19 k' 6. =--0.02 ,, GLB !;/8 x_ 2-t I. 2.S M = 113.90 k' > 48.ol K' , . ·. , 00£;/ _B-1-3-l/ Project Job No. Sheet /(-J_-0O Subject Cale. Date lnte~rated Structural Design 440 Beech Street, Suite #201, San Diego, California 92101 619.696-0866 i:7E"AM Bl7 -( ~) 51/& 1<-191/2 GL.B ( oN I-IN(;; 5 B5T, C & E ) 1RIB. AR8A -=-~4.o x -32.0 · =-lCoZ> FT 2 Rem. L. LOAD ,::: 12 P01= P =[( 12 t 4 t l:i) P5f >< &.o '] x J.4.o'· ::. S.~8, k ( 3.ol t--2.~I) D L 1.8 Co k ( 4 .4 9 t 3. ~-1 ) D t:. 8_22,k. ( 4.13 t 3.55) D L. H =--84.o f<.-' ,'--·. p p p =-5. 3~.J-- 1 l l g_17 8.ol 8.ol 7.3S1 / k RL'=-l.8Co - 31.54 LI-~ !Co P-&f R" = 8.2.sk ( 4-:J3t 3.55) p L :p :; ( 12.+4tl~)xh 2-4 -:: ~.t+ I<.(_ 3.01+ 3.01 .D /.. RR: 9.45k(4.l3t4.72-) D L , ' DDS{ -Cl Project Job No. Sheet Subject Cale. Date lnte9rated Structural Design 440 Beech Street, Suite #201, San Diego, California 92101 619.696-0866 · PIPE.£ STD. 2. AREA = ~4 x 40/2. -480 FT . {;U ~ / 1 + IS + /'C:> _ 43 P.sF :J?L. 5bL. l,L -P _ 43 F'S.f x 4BO :::: :J.0 ~ t:;;4 k . LaAb PROM 1 /iH I . . = o , G7 ( 2 ,>( .3 . 3) x I 3/i4 x 1/2 -f~Ge,k · . . . k -tp _ -20 .. 04 + I~ ~c;, .... :i-2~3(? F0/2.. fTCJ. 3 ~ c;,'' SQ~ 1 C/1 :::. l. 375 ksf ${Lf< CH .-~ V CL 1J . (z. 2. 3 o + .J-,4S )/(_ 3,Sx 3 ,5} --· 2,02 k.sF < 2. 375 ~Sf. I, , C2- Project Job No. Sheet Subject Cale. Date Integrated Structural Design 440 Beech Street, Suite #201, San Diego, California 92101 619.696-0866 I " C£JL. Q,·Co-G PIPE 5 :STD. 1 fTQ. 3-C2i .Sc9-. .:>-. frl<E?t = .14.0 x 4o/z ~ 4-Bo FT . m 1 _ l2t!St-'I~ -=-· 4.3 P.SF ,.. 2-Al =--. ;i,4, X 14/2 -~BB FT. V -BET-Gr ft c,. C, m 2 -I ;;2. -t-.5 t-/(LJ _ .33 f sr A 2 -4 80 -:2 BB -= _ ) 9 2 FT~ I¼ T • a· e, tj t+ · -. !{Aft 18 P _ 43ix. ~BB t--3 3 x I ~2.t;2.><V~5><-3 • ~ x /24-><-½4 -l:J.. 3 B -t-G ~ 34 +0,7·2=: I '1-: 4LJ-K t -[1'1,4-4 +(o,;?.oox0.s~~.s)]/(:,.!,,,_3.s). -:2/.8fl(3-5".3·S) = 1-7'7k5F <~·37SkSF . I L01tb CAP_AC1ry (JF srttl PIPE. s''sr!J. IL= IB.o P = 47,0 k / 19.4-41<. ALL (N) COLUMNS f; FTC,. SAMI= ' .. I ISD -Integrated Structural Design 440 Beech Street, Suite 201 San Diego, c~ 9210_1 Title: Dsgnr: Description : Scope: Job# DOS/ Date: 11 :22AM, 1 DEC 00 Rev: 510303 User: KW00&0S6S, Ver 5.1.31'22-Jun-1999, Win32 (c) 1983°99 ENERCALC Cantilevered Retaining Wall Design Page Description Modetek -Ramp RSTAININ6 WALL e, R.6-MP cc_-_rit·e-ri._a _______ -.. ~r o-at_a ______ ¥_i_£J Allow Soil Bearing 2,000.0 psf [Footrn9 srrer1gms&-DITT1ensions·-) re = 3,000 psi Fy = 60,000 psi Equivalent Fluid Pressure Method Heel Active Pressure = 35.0 Toe Active Pressure = 0.0 Passive Pressure = 250.0 Retained Height = 2.67 ft Wall height above soil = 0.50 ft Slope_ Behind Wall = 6.oo: 1 = 8.00in Min. As% = 0.0014 Toe Width = 0.67 ft Heel Width = 1.33 . Water height over heel = 0.0 ft Height of Soil over Toe Soil Density = 110.Q0 pcf Total Footing Width = ---zoo· Footing Thickness = 12.00 in Wind· on Stem = · L~~~~!™fo: 1£ [Design Summary Total Bearing Load ... resultant ecc. = = 0.0 psf 917 lbs 4.71 in Soil Pressure@ Toe = 1,006 psf OK Soil Pressure @ Heel = 0 psf OK Allowable ;= 2,000 psf Soil Pressure Less Than Allowable ACI Factored-@ Toe = 1,408 psf ACI Factored @ Heel = 0 psf Footing Shear @Toe - Footing Shear@ Heel = Allowable = 0.0 psi OK 5.1 psi OK 93.1 psi Wall Stability Ratios Overturning ·-2.11 OK Sliding = 1. 77 OK Sliding Cales Slab Resists All Sliding ! Lateral Sliding Force · = 352.5 lbs Footing-Design Results !eer Toe· Factored Pressure = 1,408 o psf Mu': Upward = 277 0 ft-# Mu' : Downward = 70 167 ft-# Mu: Design = 207 167 ft-# Actual 1-Way Shear = 0.00 5.15 psi f',llow 1-Way Shear = 93.11 93.11 psi Toe Reinforcing = #4@ 12.00 it, Heel Reinforcing = None Spec'd Key Reinforcing = None'S.pec'd Footingl!Soil Friction = 0.300 Soil height to ignore for passive pressure = 0.00 in Surcharge Over Heel = 100.0 psf · Used To Resist Sliding & Overturning Key Width = 0.00 in Key Depth = 0.00 in Key Distance from Toe = 0.00 ft Cover@ Top = 3.00 in @ Btm.= 3.00 in Surcharge Over Toe = 0.0 psf Used for Sliding & Overturning ["Stem Construction I Top Stem '7--111!!!!11111111!-l(la!ll!ll(la---•· 11!--~S~te-m~O~K~------------ Design height ft= 0.00 Wall Material Above "Ht" Thickness Rebar Size · Rebar Spacing Rebar Placed at Design Data fb/FB + fa/Fa Total Force @ Section Moment....Actual Moment. .... Allowable Shear ..... Actual · = = = = = = lbs= ft-#= = psi= Shear ..... Allowable psi= Bar Develop ABOVE Ht. in = Bar Lap/Hook BELOW Ht. in = Wall Weight = Rebar Depth 'd' in= Concrete 8.00 # 4 12.00 Center 0.111 356.5 381.6 3,423.0 7.4 93.1 17.09 6·.oo 96.7 4.00 Masonry Data -------------------------rm psi= Fs psi= Solid Grouting = Special Inspection = Modular Ratio 'n' = Short Term Factor = Equiv. Solid Thick. = Masonry Block Type = Normal Weight Concrete Data re psi= 3,000.0- Fy psi= 60,000.0 ,,, ·Other Acceptable Sizes & Spacings 8 Toe: Not req'd, Mu < S Fr t-i Heel: Not reqid, Mu < s * Fr Key: No key· defined "'".:J .. January 9, 2001 Modetek 1990 Science Ridge Drive Chino Hills, California 91709 Attention: Dexter Humphrey w CHRJSTIAN WHEELER ENGINEER.ING CWE 200.645.2 SUBJECT: FOUNDATION PLAN REVIEW, PROPOSED CLEAN LABORATORY, 2075 LAS PALMAS-DRIVE, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA. Reference: 1) "Report of Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Clean Laboratory, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California", by Christi.an Wheeler Engineering, dated December 1, 2000. 2) Foundation plan for Proposed Modetek Clean Laboratory, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, Califomia, by Integrated Structw:al Design, dated December 18, 2000 . . '·' Ladies and Gentlemen: In acco.rdanc~ with your reqµest, y,,e have .reviewed the foundation plan for the subject project in order to . . verify that the .recommendations presented in the referenced geotechnical report have been incorporated in the plans and specifications. In general, the foundation plans are in conformance with the .recommendations presented in the .referenced geotechnical report If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact our office. This opportunity to be of professional service is sincerely appreciated. Respectfully sub~tted, CHRISTIAN WHEELER ENGINEERING, INC. Charles H. Christi.an, RGE #00215 CHC:scc · .. •:·- cc: (2) Submitted (2) Lund V andruff (1) Integrated Structural Design 4925 Mercury Street + San Diego, CA 92111 + 858-496-9760 + FAX 858-496-9758 0C> <-iw7 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ,, w CHRISTIAN WHEELER_ ENGINEER.ING REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED CLEAN LABORATORY INSTALLATION 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA PREPARED FOR: MODETEK 1990 SCIENCE RIDGE DRIVE CHINO HILLS, CALIFORNIA 91709 PREPARED BY: CHRISTIAN WHEELER ENGINEERING 4925 MERCURY STREET SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92111 4925 Mercury Street + San Diego, CA 92111 + 858-496-9760 + FAX 858-496-9758 0C::Y '-( 'do1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I December 1, 2000 ModeTek 1990 Science Ridge Drive Chino Hills, California 91709 Attention: De."<:ter Humphrey If CHRJSTIAN WHEELER. ENGINEERING CWE 200.645.1 SUBJECT: REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION, PROPOSED CLEAN LABORATORY, 2075 LAS P ALMAS DRIVE, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA. Ladies and Gentlemen: In accordance with your .request and our Proposal dated October 16, 2000 we have performed a geotechnical investigation for the subject project We are presenting herewith our findings and .recommendations. In general, no geotechnical conditions were encountered that would preclude the construction of the proposed clean lab provided that the .recoriunendati.ons contained in this .report are followed. The project area is underlain by medium dense to dense fill material .ranging in thickness from approximately three and one-half feet to over nine feet. These materials appear to be suitable to support the proposed loads; however, the bearing load will need to be limited as discussed in the "Foundations" section of this .report. In addition, the foundation excavations should be observed by a representative of Christian Wheeler Engineering prior to the placement of steel in order to confirm that the field conditions are as anticipated and that no. other site preparation is necessary. Respectfully submitted, CHRISTIAN WHEELER ENGINEERING Shawn Caya, Staff Engineer ~ Charles H. Christian, RGE 00215 CHC:CRB:scc cc: (2) Submitted (2) Lund V andruff (1) Integrated Structuml Design. Curtis R. Burdett, CEG 1090 4925 Mercury Street + San Diego, CA 92111 + 858-496-9760 + FAX 858-496-9758 I I I I I I I I .I I I I I I I I I I I l I TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Introduction and Project Description .... , ......................................................................................................... 1 Project Scope ....................................................... -................................................................................................. 2 Findings ............................................................. -................................................................................................... 3 Site Description; ............................................................................................................................................ 3 General Geology and Subsurface Conditions .......................................................................................... 3 Geologic Settlng and Soil Description .................................................................................................. 3 Fill ............................................................................................................................................................ 3 Santiago Formation ................. -.. , .......................................................................................................... 3 Groundwater ............................................................................................................................................. 4 Tectonic Settlng ........................................................................................................................................ 4 Geologic Hazards ......................................................................................................................................... 4 General ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 Ground Shaking ................................................ -...................................................................................... 4 Seismic Design Parameter$ ..................................................................................................................... 5 Lanq.slide Potential and Slope Stability ................................................................................................. 6 Liquefaction ............. _ ................................................................................................................................ 6 Flooding ..................................................................................................................................................... 6 Tsunamis ................................................................................................................................................... 6 Seiches ........................................................................................................................................................ 6 -Conclusions ........................................................................................................................................................... 6 Recommendations ............................. _ .. .-............................................................................................................... 6 Foundations ......................... _ ............ _ .......................................................................................................... 6 General. ...................................................................................................................................................... 6 Bearing Capacity ....................................................................................................................................... 7 Footing Reinforce:tnent ........................................................................................................................... 7 Lateral Load Resistance ........... : ............................................................................................................... 7 Settlement Characteristics ....................................................................................................................... 7 Expansive Characteristics ....................................................................................................................... 7 Foundation Plan Review ......................................................................................................................... 8 Foundation E~cavation -Observation .................................................................................................... 8 On Grade Slabs ............................................................................................................................................ 8 Interior Floor Slabs .................................................................................................................................. 8 Moisture Protection for Interior Slabs ................................................................................................. 8 Limitations ... -.................................. _ ..................................................................................................................... 8 Field Explorations ............... -. ................................................................................................................................ 9 Laboratory Testing ........................................... , ................................................................................................... 9 CWE 200.645.1 Proposed Clean Lab 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, California t L ,,1 I :I I I I I I I I I. 1· I I I I I I I I TABLES T~ble I Table II FIGURES Figure 1 PLATES. 1,=>late 1 Plates 2-4 ATTACHMENTS Maximum Bedrock Accelerations, Page 6 Seismic Design Parameters, Page 6 Site Vicinity Map, Follows Page 1 Site Plan Boring Logs APPENDICES AppendixA References CWE 200.645.1 Proposed Clean Lab 207 S Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, California I I I I I I I I .I I I I I I I I I I I If CHRISTIAN WHEELER ENGINEER.ING GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED CLEAN LABORATORY INSTALLATION 2075 LAS P ALMAS DRIVE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION This report presents the results of a geotechnical investigation performed for the proposed installation of a pre-fabricated clean lab inside the existing building located at 2075 Las Palmas Drive, in the City of Carlsbad, California. The following Figure Number 1 presents a vicinity map showing the location of the property. To assist in t;he preparation of this report, our firm was provided with a partial plan prepared by Integrated Structural Design. A copy of this plan was used as the base for our site plan attached as Plate No. 1. The subject site is a developed commercial lot that supports an existing tilt-up concrete building and associated parking, driveways and landscaping. We understand that the existing building will be extensively remodeled and that a pre-fabricated clean lab will be constructed in the central portion of the building. The lab will be constructed in modules and will cover about 5,000 square feet in area, with a total weight of approximately 111,220 pounds. It is expected that the loads of the clean lab will be supported by new isolated spread footings. The new footings will be constructed by sawcutting through the existing slab and excavating for the footings. No grading will be necessary for this project. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Mode Tek and their design consultants for specific application to the project described hereitJ. Should the project be modified, the conclusions and recommendations presented in this report should be reviewed by Christian \Vheeler Engineering for conformance with our recommendations and to determine if any additional subsurface investigation, laboratory testing and/ or recqmroendations are necessary. Our professional services have been performed, our findings obtained and our recommendations prepared in accordance with generally accepted engineering principles and practices. This warranty is in lieu of all other warranties, expressed or implied. 4925 Mercury Street + San Diego, CA 92111 + 858-496-9760 + FAX 858-496-9758 ,, I I~ ~ 2 Cl) ,~ ~ O' j:: Ii . @) I I I I· I ·1 .I I I I 5 I I I I D E I Figure No. 1 I -I I ,I I I I I I -1 I ·1 I I I I- I I I • t ,, C\VE 200.645.1 December 1, 2000 Page No.2 PROJECT SCOPE The scope of our preliminary investigation included: surface reconnaissance, subsurface exploration, obtaining representative soil samples, laboratory testing, analysis of the field and laboratory data and review of relevant geologic literature. Based on consideration of past experience in the vicinity of the subject site, three small-diameter borings were excavated in order to explore the subsurface soil conditions and to obtain soil samples for laboratory testing. More specifically, the intent of this investigation was to: a) b) c) d) -e) f) Explore the subsurface conditions of the site to the depths influenced by the proposed construction. Evaluate, by laboratory tests, the engineering properties of the various strata that may influence the proposed construction, including bearing capacities, expansive characteristics and settlement potential. Describe the general geology at the site including possible geologic factors that could have an effect on the site development, and provide the seismic design parameters as required by the most recent ad4ition of the Uniform Building Code. Address potential construction difficulties that may be encountered due to soil conditions, groundwater or geologic hazards, and provide recommendations concerning these problems. Recommend an appropriate foundation system for the type of improvements anticipated ·and develop soil engineering design criteria for the recommended foundation design. Prepare this report, which includes, in addition to our conclusions and recommendations1 a plot plan, exploration logs and a summary of the laboratory test results. It is not within the scope of our services to perform laboratory tests to evaluate the chemical characteristics of the on-site soils in regard to their potentially corrosive impact to on-grade concrete and below grade improvements. If desiteP, we can obtain samples of representative soils and submit them to a chemical laboratory for analysis. Further, it should be understood Christian Wheeler I I I I I ·1 I I I I -1 I -I I I I -1· I I 1. V JI CWE 200.645.1 December 1, 2000 PageNo.3 Engineering does not practice corrosion engineering. If such an analysis is necessary, we recommend that the developer retain an engineering firm that specializes in this field to consult with them on this matter. FINDINGS SITE DESCRIPTION The subject site is a developed commercial lot that supports an existing tilt-up concrete building and associated p:,:irking, driveways, and landscaping, located at 2075 Las Palmas Drive in the City of Carlsbad, California. The building was previously used as offices for the City of Carlsbad Engineering Department. The proposed clean room and lab additions are to be installed within the west-central and east.,.central portions of the existing structure, respectively. Together, the clean room and lab additions will occupy most ofthe central portion of the structure (please refer to the Site Plan included herein as Plate No. 1). Offices, rest rooms, a library, a break room, a storage room, and a mechanical room will be present along the periphery of the clean room and lab additions. The area to support the proposed clean room and laboratory additions currently supports a level, 4½-inch thick concrete slab that is underlain by a moisture barrier consisting of a 3-inch thick sand blanket and a visqueen barrier. GENERAL GEOLOGY AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS GEOLOGIC SETTING AND SOIL DESCRIPTI(?N: The subject site is located in the Coastal Plains Physiographic Province of San Diego County. Based on the results of our limited exploration and analysis of readily available, pertinent geologic and geotechnical literature, we have determined that the site is underlain by man-placed fill n;iaterial overlying Tertiary-age deposits of the Santiago Formation. The geologic units that underlie the subject property are described below in order of increasing age: FILL (Q~f): ~-placed fill material consisting of medium brown to grayish-/reddish-brown, clayey sand (SC) was encountered in each of our exploratory borings. The fill layer had an approximate thickness of three and one-half feet within B-1, approximately seven feet within B-3, and extended beyond the maximum explored depth of five feet in B-2. The encountered fill was generally moist and medium dense to sJ-~se in consistency. ,, SANTIAGO FORMATION (Tsa): Below the fill material, the site is underlain by Tertiary-age deposits of the Santiago Formation. The fonnational material was encountered below the fill at a depth of approzjmately three and one-half feet within B-1, approximately seven feet within B-3, I ,, I I I I I I I I I I I· I I I ·I I I r.1. ,, C\VE 200.645.1 December 1, 2000 PageNo.4 and is e."q)ected to underlie the fill within B-2. The encountered material of the Santiago Formation was observed to consist of light to medium brown, clayey sand (SC). This material was observed to be generally moi$t and very dense, GROUNDWATER: Groundwater w:as not encountered in any of our borings extended on-site, and groundwater is not expected to be a pro bl~ either during or after construction of the new improvements provided proper drainage is maintained on the site. TECTONIC SETTING: It should be noted that much of Southern California, including the San Diego County area, is characterized by a series of Quaternary-age fault zones that consist of several ipdividuai en echelon faults that generally strike in a northerly to northwesterly direction. Some of these fault zones (and the individual faults within the zone) are classified as "active" according to the criteria of the California Division of Mines and Geology. Active fault zones are those that have shown conclusive evidence of faulting during the Holocene Epoch (the most recent 11,000 years). A review of available geologic maps indicates that the active Rose Canyon Fault Zone is located approximately 10 kilometers west of the subject site. Other active fault zones in the region that could possibly affect the site include the Coronado Bank and San Clemente Fault Zones to the southwest and the Elsinore, San Jacinto, and San Andreas Fault Zones to the northeast GEOLOGIC HAZARDS GENERAL: No geologic hazards of sufficient magnitude to preclude development of the site as we presently contemplate it are known to exist In our professional opinion and to the best of our knowledge, the site is suitable for the proposed development. GROUND SHAKING: A likely geologic hazard to affect the site is ground shaking as result of movement along one of the major active fault zones mentioned above. The maximum bedrock accelerations that would be attributed to a maxi.mum magnitude earthquake occurring along the nearest fault segments of selected fault zones that could affect the site are summarized in the following Table I. I I I I I I I I I -I I I I I I I I 11, J. .A"\ CWE 200.645.1 December 1, 2000 PageNo.5 TABLE I Fault Zone Distance Maximum Magnitude Maximum Bedrock Earthquake Acceleration Rose Canyon 10km 6.9 magnitude 0.31 g Coronado Bank 35km 7.4 magnitude 0.17 g .. Elsinore 37km 7 .1 Magnitude 0.13 g San Jacinto 74km 7 .2 magnitude 0.08g Probable ground shaking levels at the site could range from slight to moderate, depending on such factors as the magnitude of the seismic event and the distance to the epicenter. It is likely that the site will experience the effects of at least one moderate to large earthquake during the life of the remodeled structure. SEISMIC DESIGN P .ARAMETERSi In ac.cordance with the evaluations provided above, the Maximum Bedrock Acceleration at the site is 0.31 g. This is based upon a Ma.."illllum Magnitude Seismic Event of 6.9 Magnitude along the nearesfporti.on of the Rose Canyon Fault shown on Maps of Known Active Fault Near-Source Zones in California andAcfjacent Portions of California to be used with the 1997 Uniform Building Code. For structural design purposes, a damping ratio not greater than 5 percent of critical dampening, and Soil Profile Type Sc are recommended (UBC Table 16-J). Based upon the site being approximately 10 kilometers from the Rose Canyon Fault (Type B Fault), Near Source Factors Na equal to 1.0 andNv equal to 1.0 are also applicable. These values, along with other seismically related design parameters from the Uniform Building Code (UBq 1997 edition, Volume II, Chapter 16, utilizing a Seismic Zone 4 are presented in tabular form below. TABLE II UBC-Chapter _16 Seismic Design Recommended Table No. Parameter Value 16-I Sei~mic Zone Factor Z 0.40 16-J Soil Profile Type Sc 16-Q Seismic Coefficient Ca 0.40Na 16-R Seisnµq Coefficient Cv 0.56Nv 16--S Near Source Factor Na 1.0 16-T Near Source Factor Nv 1.0 16-U Seismic Source Type B I I I I I 1- 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 'I. L •' CWE 200.645.1 December 1, 2000 Page No.6 LANDSLIDE POTENTIAL AND SLOPE STABILITY: A detailed, deterministic slope stability analysis was not included within our scope of services. However, based on the site topography, as well as the_ relatively competent nature of the formational materials underlying the site, it is our opinion that the risk of deep-seated slope instability problems is very low. LIQUEFACTION: The native materials at the site are not subject to liquefaction due to such factors as soil density, grain-size distribution, and the absence of shallow groundwater conditions. FLOODING: The site is located 9utside the boundaries of both the 100-year and the 500-year floodplains according to the maps prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. TSUNAMIS: Tsunamis are great sea waves produced by submarine earthquakes or volcanic eruptions. Ba~ed upon the location and elevation of the site in relation to the ocean, the site is not considered to be subject to tsunamis. SEICHES: Seiches are periodic oscillations in large bodies of water such as lakes, harbors, bays or reservoirs. Due to the site's location, it is not considered to be subject to seiches. CONCLUSIONS In general, no geotechnical conditions were encountered that would preclude the construction of the proposed clean lab provided that the recommendations contained in this report are followed. The project area is underlain by medium dense to dense fill material ranging in thickness from approximately three and one-half feet to seven feet These materials appear to be suitable to support the proposed loads; however, the bearing load will need to be limited as discussed fa the "Foundations" section of this report. In addition, the foundation excavations should be observed by a representative of Christian Wheeler Engineering prior to the placement of reinforcing steel in order to confirm that the :field conditions are as anticipated and that no other site preparation is necessary. RECOMMENDATIONS FOUNDATIONS GENERAL: Based on our investigation, it is our opinion that new footings supporting the laboratory improvements may-consist of conventional spread footings. New spread footings supporting the new clean lab should be embedded at least 24 inches below the top of the adjacent slab-on-grade. Continuous I I I· I I I ·I I I I I , l ,, CWE 200.645.1 December 1, 2000 Page No.7 footings should have a minimum width of 12 inches, while isolated spread footings should be minimally diniensioned at 24 inches in width or diameter. BEARING CAP A CITY: Conventional spread footings with the above minimum dimensions may be designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 2,000 pounds per square foot. This value may be increased by 500 pounds per square foot and 250 pounds per square foot for each additional foot of footing depth and width, respectively, up to a maximum of 3,000 pounds per square foot. Additionally, the bearing capacity may be increased by one-third for combinations of temporary loads such as those due to wind or seismic loads. FOOTING REINFORCEMENT: The project structural engineer should provide reinforcement requirements for foundations. However, based on soil conditions, we recommend that the minimum reinforcing for new continuous footings consist of at least one No. 5 bar positioned three inches above the bottom. of the footing and one No. 5 bar positioned two inches below the top of the footing. Where new footings abut existing footings, they should be doweled together in accordance with structural engineering recommendations. LATERAL LOAD RESISTANCE: L~teral loads against foundations may be resisted by friction between the bottom of the footing ~d the supporting soil, and by the passive pressure against the footing. The coefficient of friction between concrete and soil may be considered to be 0.35. The passive resistance may be considered to be equal to an equivalent fluid weight of 300 pounds per cubic foot. This assumes the footings are poured tight against undisturbed soil. If a combination of the passive pressure and friction is used, the friction value should be reduced by one-third SETTLEMENT CHARACTERISTICS: The anticipated total and/or differential settlementis expected to be less than about one-half inch for new foundations, provided the recommendations presented in this report are followed. It should be recognized that minor cracks normally occur in concrete slabs and foundations due to shrinkage during curing or redistribution of stresses, therefore some cracks may be anticipated Such cracks are not necessarily an indication of excessive vertical ·movements. EXPANSIVE CHARACTERISTICS: The anticipated foundation soils are expected to have a low expansive potential. The recommendations presented in this report reflect this condition. I I .I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I t. C "'" CWE 200:645.1 December 1, 2000 PageNo.8 FOUNDATION PLAN REVIEW: The foundation plans should be submitted to this office for review in order to ascertain that the recommendations of this report have been implemented, and that no additional recommendations are needed due to changes in the anticipated construction. FOUNDATION EXCAVATION OBSERVATION: All foundation e.."s:cavations should be observed by the Geotechnical Consultant prior to placing reinforcing steel to determine if the foundation recommendations presented herein are complied with. All footing excavations. should be excavated neat, level and square. All loose or unsuitable material should be removed from shallow and deep foundation excavations prior to the placement of concrete. ON-GRADE SLA,BS INTERIOR FLOOR SLAB: The minimum floor slab thickness for new slabs should be four inches. The floor slab should be reinforced with at leastNo. 3 bars placed at 18 inches on center each way. Slab reinforcing should be placed on chairs and positioned at mid-height in the floor slab. Where new slabs abut existing slabs and footings, they should be doweled together. ~OISTURE PROTECTION FOR INTERIOR SLABS: Where the concrete on-grade floor slabs will support moisture-sensitive floor covering, it should be underlain by a moisture barrier. We recommend that the minimum configuration of the subslab moisture barrier consist of a four-inch- thick blanket of coarse, clean sand. The moisture barrier material should have less than ten percent and five percent passing the No. 100 and No, 200 sieves, respectively. A visqueen vapor barrier should be · placed in the center of the moisture protection blanket. Our experience indicates that this moisture barrier should allow the transmission of from about six to twelve pounds of moisture per 1000 square feet per day through the oti-:grade slab. This may be aq excess amount of moisture for some types of floor covering. If additional protection.is considered necessary, additional recommendations can be provided. LIMITATIONS The recommendations artd opinions e.."s:pressed in this report reflect our best estimate of the project reguirements based on an evaluation of the subsurface soil conditions encountered at the subsurface exploration locations and the assumption that the soil conditions do not deviate appreciably from those encountered. It should be recognized that tlie performance of the foundations might be influenced by undisclosed or unforeseen variations in the soil conditions that n;iay occur in the intermediate and unexplored areas. Any unusual conditions not covered in this ieport that may be encountered during I I I I I I I I I -I I I I I I I I I I l I •' CWE 200.645.1 December 1, 2000 Page No.9 site development should be brought to the attention of the soils engineer so that he may make modifications if necessary. In addition, this office should be advised of any changes in the project scope or proposed site grading 'SO that it may be determined if the recommendatlons contained herein are appropriate. This should be verified in writing or modified by a written addendum. FIELD EXPLORATIONS Three subsurface exploratlons were made at the locatlons indicated on the site plan included herewith as Plate Number 1 on November 7, 2000. These exploratlons consisted of small-diameter borings drilled with continuous solid flight auger driven on a tripod mounted drill rig. The fieldwork was conducted by or under the observatlon of our engineering_geology personnel. The exploratlon was carefully logged when made. The test pit log is presented on the following Plate Numbers 2. The soils are described in accordance with the Unified Soils Classificatlon. In addition, a verbal textural description, the wet color, the apparent moisture and the density or consistency are provided. The density of granular soils is given as either very loose, loose, medium dense, dense or very dense. The consistency of silts or clays is given as either very soft, soft, medium stlff, stlff, very stlff, or hard. Bulle samples of disturbed soil were collected in bags from the borings. In addition, "undisturbed" samples of representative soils were obtained from the borings and returned to the laboratory for testing. The undisturbed samples from the borings were obtained by driving a 2-3/8 inch ID split-tube sampler ahead of the auger using a 140 pound weight free falling a distance of 30 inches. The number of blows to drive the sampler twelve inches was recorded and this number is presented on the boring log as the "Penetratlon Resistance". LABORATORYTESTING Laboratory tests were performed in accordance with the generally accepted American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTIYi) test methods or suggested procedures. A brief description of the tests performed is presented below: a} CLASSIFICATION: Field classifications were verified in the laboratory by visual examination. The final soil classifications are in accordance with the Unified Soil Classificatlon System. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I '·t f.JJ CWE 200.645.1 December 1, 2000 Page No.10 b) c) d) MOISTURE-DENSITY: In-place moisture contents and dry densities were determined for representative soil samples. This information was an aid to classification and permitted recognition of variations in material consistency with depth. The dry unit weight is determined in pounds per c'llbic foot, and the in-place moisture content is determined as a percentage of the soil's dry weight The results of these tests are summarized in the boring logs. COMPACTION TEST: The maximum dry density and optimum moisture content of a sample of near-surface material to be used as fill was determined in the laboratory in accordance with ASTM Standard Test D-1557-91. The result of this test is presented below. Sample Number Description Ma.mum Density Optimum Moisture Content Boring B-3 @ 1 ' -7' Yellowish-brown, silty sand (SJY.I) 120.7 pcf 11.6 percent EXP ANSI ON INDEX TEST: An Expansion Index test on a remolded sample was performed on ~ representative sample of the clayey subsoil likely to be present at finish grade. The test was performed on the portion of the sample passing the #4 standard sieve. The s$l,ple was brought to optimum mois~e content and then dried back to a constant moisture content for 12 hours at 230 + 9 degrees Fahrenheit. The specimen was then compacted in a 4- inch-diameter mold in two equal layers by means of a tamper, then trimmed to a final height of 1 inch, and brought to a saturation of approximately 50 percent. The specimen was placed in a consolidometer with porous stones at the top and bottom, a total normal load of 12.63 pounds was placed (144.7 psf), and the sample was allowed to consolidate for a period of10 minutes. The sample was saturated, and the change in vertical movement was recorded until the rate of expansion became nominal. The expansion index is reported below as the total vertical displacement divided by the initial specimen height, then multiplied by 1000. Sample Number: Initial Moisture: Initial Dry Density: Final Moisture: Expansion Index: Classification: Boring B-1 @0-3½' 8.5% 104.4 pcf 20.2% 27 Low I I I I I I I 'I I I I I I I I I I ·I I CWE 200.645.1 December 1, 2000 PageNo.11 e) DIRECT SHEAR TEST: Direct shear tests were performed to determine the failure envelope based on yield shear strength. The shear box was designed to accommodate a sample having a diameter of 2.375 inches or 2.50 inches and a height of 1.0 inch. Samples were tested at differe;nt vertical loads in a saturated moisture condition. The shear stress was applied at a constant rate of strain of approximately 0.05 inch per minute. The results of these tests are presented below. Sample Number: Description: Angle of Internal Friction: Apparent Cohesion: Sample Number: Description: Angle of Internal Friction: Apparent Cohesion: Boring B-1 @ 1 ½' Relatively Undisturbed 290 700 psf Boring B-2 @ 2' Relatively Undisturbed 40° 250 psf I I I I I ·1 I .I I I I I I I I I I I I '-l• ,:,,I ' -• 'i:· ! ' ~ ~~ '' "'t ' • • ! e , APP~.Ql+ij-~~-l~~ L'OCATION Qaf ARTIFicJiL :FILL' ' l l .I .. ·.W CHRISTIAN WHEELER . ENGINEERING MODETEK CLEAN LAB BY: CHC/SCC/HC DATE: 11-28-00 JOB NO: 200.645 PLATENO: 1 -' tilil I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •1,1 ~ LOG OF BORING NUMBER B-1 Date Excavated: 11/7 /00 Logged by: JAB Equipment: Super Beaver Project Manager: CHC Surfa~e Elevation (ft): N/A Depth to Water:: N/A Hammer Weight: 140'lbs Drop of Hammer: 30 inches SAMP LES SU:MI:v[ARY OF SU:8SURFACE CONDITIONS l'.I-l 61'.I-l 'o' ~ ~ ~ ~ -u~ "-' 0 ~ ~~~ ~ C: Q en ~ ...:I ~ ~ ;:) z u ~ ti) ;:) ti) ;:) _£,I ~ ~ (J=1 ~ H ..9 0 Z en .s, ; ~ j ~~ Po< Q FiU (Qaf,): Medium brown, CLAYEY SAND (SC), moist, medium dense, fine-to medium-grained. us 31 122 106.2 D.S. 12 14 16 18 Santiago Formation Q'sa): Medium brown to light orangish- brown, CLAYEY SAND (SC), moist, medium dense to dense. Becomes very dense. us us E.I. 42 7.3 99.4 54/5" 10.7 110.4 20 L--J.------------,-,~-.. --------L...--'---'-----'---'---L.-___,.J CHRJSTIAN WHEELER. BY: ENGINEER.ING JOB NO. PROPOSED CLEAN LABORATORY 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California sec DATE: 1211100 200.645 PLATE NO.: 2 ·1 I I I I I I I I. I I I I I: I I I LOG OF BORING NUMBER B-2 Date Excavated: Equipment: Surface Elevation (ft): Hammer Weight: 11/7 /00 Super Beaver N/A 140 lbs SUMMARY OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Logged by: Project Manager: Depth to Water:: Drop of Hammer: SAMPLES ~ a~ ~ -u -0 ~ ~~~ ~ H :::i f-i Cl) ~ ~ i:Q i::tl -..... z Cl) .e, ~ gJ Cl) p... Fill (Oaf); Grayish-brown, CLAYEY SAND (SC), moist, dense. us 41 JAB CHC N/A 30 inches 'o' ~ ~ ~ .__, gJ ~Q 0 ~ ~ :::i z u Cl) t; :::i ._9; f:l 0 ; ~ j Q 123 106.4 D.S. ............................ _ ........................................................................ _ ....................................................................................................................... . Reddish-brown, CLAYEY SAND (SC), moist, dense. us 54 9.6 101.7 . 6 Practkai refusal of drilling equipement qn cobble at 5 feet 8 10 12· 14 16 18 20 .__-.a...-""-------------,_:--,--.---------'-----'""----"---,____. _ ____,'---___, CHRISTIAN WHEELER. BY: E.NGINEER.ING JOB NO. PROPOSED CLEAN LABORATORY 2075 Las Palm.as Drive, Carlsbad, California sec DATE: 1211100 200.645 PLATE NO.: 3 I I I I I I· I I I I I I 'I I I I I I I LOG OF BORING NUMBER B-3 Date Excavated: Equipment: Surface Elevation (ft): , HammerWeight: 11/7/00 Super Beaver N/A 140 lbs SUlYfMARY OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Logged by: Project Manager: Depth to Water:: Drop of Hammer: SAMPLES i::t:l ~ i::t:l ~ 1-1U-c-- ~ ~~~ ~ ....:l {--i ~ ~ ::::> ~ p::i ~ 1-f,...,. z C/) ,8, i::t:l ~ 11, Fill (QM): Grayish-brown, CLAYEY SAND (SC), moist, dense. JAB CHC N/A 30 inches '0' ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 tQ C/) ::::> z u ~ ~ ~ ::::i-Bi ~ 0 ; ~ j Cl us 40 14.4 108.1 D.S. 12 14 16 18 Santiago Formation Q'sa): Medium brown, CLAYEY SAND (SC), moist, dense. us us M.D. 66 9.7 1122 68 8.1 115.5 20 .___,_ ___________ ...,,...,.,.,.,_ _______ ..,__~ _ _._ __ _._ _ _.__~ _ __. ··:, 1:4- ,1 CHRISTIAN WHEELER. BY: ENGINEER.ING JOB NO. PROPOSED CLEAN LABORATORY 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California sec DATE: 1211100 200.645 PLATE NO.: 4 I I I I I I I· I I I I I I I· I I I I I CWE 200.645.1 December 1, 2000 Appendi..x A, Page Al REFERENCES Anderson,J.G.; Rockwell, R.K and Agnew, D.C., 1989, Past and Possible Future Earthquakes of Significance to the San Diego Region, Earthquake Spectra, Volume 5, No. 2, 1989. California Division of Mines and Geology, 1998, Maps of Known Active Fault Near Source-Zones in California and Adjacent Portions of Nevada. Jennings, C.W., 197 5, Fault Map of California, Calif9rnia Division of Mines and Geology, Map No. 1, Scale 1:750,000. Kennedy, M. P.~ 1975, Geology of La Jolla Quadrangle, San Diego County, California, California Division of Mines and Geology, Bulletin 200, Scale 1:24,000. Kern, P., 1989, Earthquakes and Faults in San Diego County, Piclde Press, 73 pp. Hart, E.W., 1994, Fault-Rupture Hazard Zones in California, California Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. Mualchin, L and Jones, A.L, 1992, Peak Acceleration from Maximum Credible Earthquakes in California (Rock and Stiff-Soil Sjtes) ~alifornia.Division of Mines and Geology Open-File Report 92-1. Wesnousky, S.G., 1986, "Earthquakes, Quaternary Faults, and Seismic Hazards in California", in Journal of Geophys1cal Research, Volume 91, No. B12, pp 12,587 to 12,631, November 1986. .CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE (Part 1 of 2) MECH-1 PROJECT NAME ,, DATE Modetek Inc. -Phase 2. 12/18/00 PROJECT ADDRESS' 2075 Las Palmas, Carlsbad, CA 92008 PRINCIPAL DESIGNER-MECHANICAL TELEPHONE Building Permit # Weather Enqineerinq (858) 541-1885 DOCUMENTATION AUTHOR TELEPHONE Checked by/Date Weather Enqineerinq (858) 541-1885 Enforcement Agency Use GENERAL INFORMATION DATE OF PLANS 12/18/00 I BUILDING CONDITIONED FLOOR AREA 13169 BUILDING TYPE @· NONRESIDENTIAL 0 HIGH RISE RESIDENTIAL [j HOTEUMOTEL GUEST ROOM PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION 0 NEW CONSTRUCTION II) ADDITION 0 ALTERATION D UNCONDITIONED (file affidavit) METHOD OF MECHANICAL COMPLIANCE @ PRESC81PTIVE 0 PERFORMANCE PROOF QF ·ENVELOPE COMPLIANCE [El PREVIOUS ENVELOPE P~RMIT 0 ENVELOPE COMPLIANCE ATTACHED STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE This Certificate of Compliance lists the building features and performance specifications need to comply with Title 24, Parts 1 and 6 of the California Code of Regulatio, Is. Th.is certificate apµlies only to building mechanical requirements. The documentation preparer hereby certifies that the documentation is accurate and complete. DOCUMENTATION AUTHOR DATE Nick Arnold 12/18/00 The Principal Mechanical Designer hereby certifies that the proposed building design represented in this set of construction documents is consistent with the otlier compliance forms and worksheets, with the specifications, and with any other calculations submitted with this permit application~ The proposed building has been designed to meet the mechanical requirements contained in the applicable parts of Sections 110 through 115, 120 through 124, 140 through 142, 144 and 145. Please check one: D I hereby affirm that I am eligible under the provisions of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code to sign this document as the person responsible for it's preparation; and that I am licensed in the State of California as a civil engineer or mechanical engineer, or I am a licensed architect. lEI I affirm that I am eligible under the exemption to Division 3 -of the Business and Professions Code by section 5537.2 or 6737.3 to sign this document as the person responsible forits preparation; and that I am a licensed contractor performing this work. D I affirm that I am eligible under the exemption to Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code to sign this document because it pertains to a structure or type of work described pursuant to Business and Professions Code Sections 5537, 5538, and 6737.1. These sections of the Business and Professions Code ar· SIGNATURE DATE LIC.# PRINCIPAL MECHANICAL DESIGNER-NAME Scott Olsen 12/18/00 474557 MECHANICAL MANDATORY MEASURES Indicate location on plans of ['16te· Block for Mandatory Measures M-1 INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT For Detailed instructions on the use of this and all Energy, Efficiency Standards compliance forms, please refer to the Nonresidential Manual published by the California Energy Commission. MECH-1: Required on plans for all submittals. Part 2 may be incorporated in schedules on plans. MECH-2: Required for all submittals, but may be incorporated in schedules on plans. · MECH-3: Required for all submittals unless required ventilation rates and airflows are shown on plans, See' 4.3.4. MECH-4: Required for all pre$criptive submftt'aJs. Nonresidential Compliance· Form November 1998 Mode'l'ek Optical Fiber Communications December 18, 2000 Mike Peterson, City of Carlsbad 1635 Fa,raday Carlsbad, CA 92008 Dexter Humphrey., ModeTek, Inc. 2075 Las Palmas Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92009 Re: Fl Area of Occupancy Pear Mr. Peterson, Please be advised, as· ofDecember 8~ 2000 ModeTek, Inc. effectively changed all H-6 a.reas of occupancy to Fl areas of occupancy for 2075 Las PaJmas Drive, Carlsbad, CA. Our current requirements for the first six months of operation are only office and storage needs. We will desj~n and construct future H-6 areas of occupancy with the current H-6 code requirements and in six months submit for H-6 area permits. For purposes of clarification the project has been divided into the 3 phases. Phase I will consist of the structure for the prefabricated lab only, the lab will not be occupied during this phase. Phase II is the Qalance of the tenant improvement work and consist ofB office occupancy and Fl light manufacturing. Phase III is the H-6 occupancy for the pre- fabricated lal> and the exterior support structures. Sincerely, ~umpl~ Modetek, Inc. 2075 Las Palmas Drive • Carlsbad, CA 92009 "'"" ... -.... ..., .. ..... H'izar:t!fo,1;1s.. Materials v-:-:---.4 • • SAN DIEGO REGIONAL \ .·· HAZARDOUS MATERIALS QUESTfONNA1RE Management Oi\liSiO!"I -•fl.ifflllcimi·u CUUf II IU.IIUt Coni,ct ,.erso11 Tel•phol'le MODETEK DEXTER HUMPHREY (909) 902-9665 Cit,' 1990 SCENIC RIDGE DR. CHJNO HILLS s,ce A.dcrt11 , 2075 LAS PALMAS c:w CARLSBAD CA CA -91709 Zip 92009 hRT 1: Fi1111 Q~i-•1m,ACNI · HUMP9\,'S M!I:~!AL:i MANAGEMENT g1111sior-.i: 2,tcu,ANcv CLill<F1c.u:~ •l'~1c1te by·c,rcllno th ittm, wheth.i your ::>1.111nut will UH, oroceu, or str>rt 1111V of the lc-llowlng hezarcou, ma1er1111. If 111v or tile ,ttms ers .:.,cled, 1pplicent muat c:cntect 1h1 !'Ii,, •rotectlcn Aill"ICV with ,uritdictior. prior ta plan 1ubmittal. '. !:ito,011 .. , or 91u1in; Agent, ,. '11mm10!1 Solids 1. P'yrophor.c:, 10. Cryogtr,lc1 1 l, Ccr,01,-~u 2. ::o'"ornud Oau, S. c,g.,..e l'1rox1dH a. Unstllb'• "HcllvH l 1 • ._.igh!y Tollic: 01 Toxic M1:-1ials i •. Cttit, t"!ul:l'l ,.,0 u.:i. 3. =111r,m1b1t or C:ornb1.1lii.t• Uqi.icte O. Cxiifittrt t. Wtttr ftHCllVH 12. fttc1iHcti·.-111 • N It V A Of-1:,C:l US:E ONL 'f ,t 11,,· 1r,1wt1 to any o tht tfUHtlo11t it yn, 1pplic1nt :nuu ~o.,11ct the County of Sin Oiego H1nrc:oui Met.,ials M1ri1g1m1r:t ,:j,,.,a,011, 1211 l"'fltrill Ave,....,, 3rd l!loor, Se,, ,i,90, C:.A UI 88•S:Gl. Ttlephon1 i8191 3a8•22,t:l P"O' :;i I'll inu1nc1 ol e O RMPP EnMOt ~ ;,,)ld111g IHfl'l'llf • . =!!5 MA'!' II! lll!OUllll!D Celt lnit11h D AMPP A••w,n<i lt VO\lr bu1in11, llfttcl or. tllt rtwt'H tlcl• of thlt fc,m1 Wtll vou, llulinen dilOOH af He.ttrdou, S.ibstancH or Mtdlcal W111tt in 1ny ll'l'IC"ntl' I O•t• ln1t1,11;s Will vour b1ain1n 1tc:r1 01 handle H1t11ao11t Sub1tanc:u In czu1mitiH aqull ta or i;r111t1r tn1r, $5 QellcM, 500 po,md1, ZOO c11bic: flHt i,r c1"inog1n1/r1produc:tiw to.1tins in ••-:v q111ntiry1 0 "MP" Ci:rr.r:,l•:e::: Will your ~11,i,,.,1 1.1a. 1ri e:IQ,1in; or inllel! in urw.:11,vcund 11cr1;e tenU W,11 vo1.11 llu1intt1 ,to,. 01 handl• Ac:1111!1 Haurdou, Mat1rill11 I Care •r.11 als "•e,T 111; St!if1 RICAQ cowm 6te POLLUflQN CONTlt9\, g1sTn1cT 11 :111 antwtr 1a 111v o111'1t quuUa111 ls YH, 1pplic,,,t 'T!UII ecintact tl''lt Air l'ollution Control District, 91!SO C!\tUl:IH~t t'lril,1, hn OiegQ, CA t2n3. ':'11er:,hon1 ttttl tl4->ao1 prier to tl'\a iHUanc• of• i,.1ildi119 p1m11t. Y!S NCI l. c:::J czs WIil th• l~tendN OCQIIPIIU in•UIII or 1,1 .. env of th• 1(1111,r,,1111 fl1ted on t111 1.i1vn; of Air l'oll11tion Control O'nriot Ptm,,t C1tt9ittin, on u,., 1111•'" llkle of Uit fonnP 2. c::::J CBI fA,.SWIR ONLY IP QUHTION 1 IS "l'H,i Will tht Mite~ facility &,t IOHtM wi,hln 1,000 f11t of tht ""'"' b01oil'ld,1ry of• tohool !K throug,. 1 ,l) 1s :ittt4 in the cvm1nt Oirec:&ory of S~hool tnd Comm11nitY C:0;1191 D11uict1. publlthecl by 1ht !ari Oltgo Counw Offlet of !:luc•11·,:,n ar.c IM cwrr1nt c..Nforni. ,.riwac• School 01111:tar,, c~iled in ticco1d1nc:e wltl\ provhiona of !duc1uo11 Code Stc111>11 33190? 211,rlv dU!RSi KIMI of (K: ;;«,;;a.a 81111~ ... 1ct1._.iy: Modetek will be ~anufacturing high performance optoelectronic components ~13:-nt ot Ow:itr o, Autlloriud A;ef"t· DE.XTER HUMPHREY ef'llllty of p•rju!'\I tllat 10th• bHt of my knowl•dge IN.! l:l•lief tN 1111,:iontH ITIIICI• hfrt r •·• t''-• o,t•: 12-/rt./t:JID r \ IY: __________________ ...., _______________ Datt: _______________ _ UIMl'T l'IICM ~111M1T ICOUl!IIM DITS COI.INT'Y•MMM0 Eav,_&al MM» SuYi1a .OJ.I$ lo(M.fl'71 ~ AflCD ~VG) JOll lll'r.DIHII •SAMIT llrt HOT OCCU,NIICV ..,._0\IIO JO• OCCUll,ll,lljCY COUNTY•MMMD A,eo COVt-TY-HMMO '"cc ~- .. .• ,.,., .. tJ, .... -P' ·-·~ Mltllar. _______ _ .~.~{=·~·-~.:r~ ., .... ______ _ -' -~ .... J -·~ ... ~~"*.JI:· ~,. ,, ~ 1/ 'h1 BAN IJUKD ... DIMllffMIINT • • Hazardous Materials Information 2075 Laa Pala.a Dr., Carlsbad CA 92001 -c.-- Nodet:ek ..... £1ec:tren1c-Caponentll Manutactarin ,.._ .... _ (909) 902-9665 LE lhUCfflCl•1 • • ... ., ..... i ... t ....................... 11:.illDtulldlnD: ,,..... 1a1111,w_ Da1PrtI11 _ Dip?-. -oaa1111111111111 _ _,.... _ . WIIIIIIOC&-. . _ -·· . Cletnr .. I . -.. ,. II I -Flaw,_._ - ---. . _ . D.812-_ Slmi:DnllUmrJllb ..L · · CGmllllt .. 111111 II 1111111& lllqltldlld b fl I I ••-a._.,. 1111 fllffl Applllllil VI~,.,..,_ Jlllllt Codi rUFCJ _.._ 1911 111---Dltr ts• (IIBDIJ ..... CIIHPlrctmr,, 111111 bl In..,._, wlllb ,_ UPC Qall_1_7 ___ 1JlfYlld•llallHC (NOT APPLICABLE) . . . 1. CHEIICN..NMIE:Llllllr&IUfl •-(I&. U 1 .. palallM•••-.)~A.,_..,..Wln....,...dleNBa ,_ .. .., ..... II iJltMTPlld. · · · I. 0.U.Nf.latl•Cln ta1Abll .. 111•111 LltllalOllllllltonlllUSDS,fflalc-NCn"·Lll1'ED". I. ~Ullllpiaw1....,.'d,_...,, c: .,....., .. _,......_,.,....._ '-CLAIIFICA110N. ,_.. .. twd dill a11l'*fl • ..,.,:011 PlllwnlObll or..,,..,.. ..,._,_b llfllClaaC11111iiA.J.l,J.C.LM..•N-.aa.,11m,•a1t111•...,•'*111111¥1, ortc111r.tod:.& =--=:::1 :£! 111!!,_III~-~-~; ~ ~··· .. •~HAii, ~lf'.IISNJlllld&VMIIIIIIUPCDl'I . I •• @,WHWii ... ,, . ·., ..... I. U11111._,...,. •• ,lllblt 111i..ex..,-...1111111pHro,OClft'D.._Ult.,.US>•m•-. 111111111r ....... MaN,1DmrDJI llll••LIB-rJDnra&(ld-OloruadcandlOrtt;blyt= ...... Ut ............ . ; I .. ··, • I. auANffl'RLlll&llllms10,-e....,...,W111PL••••1llltlllllNadufflilylllaaat11111ru.a........,. ..... Qam ............. [ ...... ___ .,: alllUIIOPIII : ,-1:112 ·~---Wllllllt I , .. ··~ -OU~-· . lt.ltUll&CI.OIID: ••: •• 11 .. aa1a•11Jl111. · c.lTDRG:;.~~ .: .... OIIJ(nol1N~GPIN•IIUS!C1.0SEDJ. 7. &.0CA110lf:J.lltllllphJ1f11fla•IIClftOfllllrAdb•at --uudDrllOIICf .... otDC ...... U(II),, Tiil lldrlllr _, ... ~ II .......... 2$11111:IQ IUIL'I ......._ tllll fo,m priDr ID~,_ ......... 10,: IUD~ · : · •. • ... . .. . . ' ,...,.., .. .,.-.-.... orr,:, •••utl ...... Wltllltwllbl ~.,,. ........... ~ o.aer.or -. --. ........ Pallr-• Dlt.ti'D JIIJIIPBRJn' OPDAHONS MANAG: . · -· :SO"Zz:-(~ : : :-t'k/J'//0 e__ HIiia:.~ _______ _.;. ______________ _ • .... -... • . .. . ....... '· '• ··~ ~ . • I, :·r !; r r. · 1 r1 T I r rl-771 T I l :r I -1 • Ii . J ,r ti,r. ·.!.. . r. . ' ·~. ;~-- ./ .·\:;.,, . . i CB004807 2075 LAS PALMAS DR CBAD MODETEK-17,368 SF OFFICE TO . QFFICE/MANUFACTURING Tl INDUST Lot#: LUND VANDRUFF r A( )-0/:>o ~ TD C try/ t(f'b/L 'lf-'j-11( L :-5-ol OJ<, 0-, ;::.cL I ~10__,a/ P1i:=l CLi,,v,...__, J-4-0 I t:s9-~e c.-J_,,lv'-· . ] -~ .::1-01 F~'j ~ CJ--VV] p\."'-~ -z(u-<_'-\ c~½t])-~ ~ -.(I. e. --~ ~ *'"(2.,<4 o-.MJ' ..,._ -g3._. e::, .f'{_r 1{tlf(ol~ J<_Ct., w/ F:;c<., ,-fofJ/6urj /0/4i,,r € M ;t.llJ:W_ 'k{tZ/Xi 1-"?-Q t BUILDING PLANNING ENGINEEfUNG FIRE APPR/FORM HEALTH DEPT l',f () r:. TO APPLICANT HAZ MAT/ AIR QUAL OTHER.SEWER DISTR BLDG GRADING l.ETTER FROM APPLiCANT .L.:::i::/i7 PLAN CORR -----1----ENG CORR ________ SCHOOL FORM · ..,.....,.._,. _____ CFO FORM 1-'5 ~/J I P E & M WORKSHEET _ BLDG FEES COMPLETE \ '\ z ---z_ L -o ( FI re C Liv; i( 1-1,~L-1'7/ "~ ~ ay <;:_-6 J L c,r1J ( £/c¥vL J ;;;,, --ID(')',,.,_ 3/r/6, \ ~ui:1r/'/1 ":)\1,\61 ~-. 1 d0 ~;< -~ ~ ~-~O<Dc?--___ \1 .. hA\n '\'~b~1.v~~"t~, DL<-*"b~· '---'-.. A ,~ \ :,f'·, l . \. \ City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 :09-04-2001 Plan Check Revision Permit No:PCR01124 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 Job Address: Permit Type: Parcel No: Valuation: Reference #: Project Title: Applica'nt: · 2075 LAS PALMAS DR CBAD PCR Lot#: 0 2130611900 $0.00 CB004807 Construction Type: NEW MODETEK -REVISE MECH PLAN Owner: Status: Applied: Entered By: Plan Approved: Issued: Inspect Area: ISSUED 06/06/2001 JM 09/04/2001 09/04/2001 LUND VANDRUFF H CITY OF CARLSBAD 9059 09/04/01 0002 01 02 CGP 109-00 3970 SORRENTO VALLEY BLVD SAN DIEGO CA 92121 ~58-457-6860 Total Fees: $109.00 Plan Check Revision Fee Additional Fees · Inspector: PUBLiC AGENCY Total Paymenfs Jo .Date: i 1 1 .. I !i, 1 Ii $0.00 FINAL APPROVAL Date: _______ _ Balance: Due: $109.00 $109.00 $0.00 Clearance: _____ _ NOTICE: Please take. NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "Imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as "fees/exactions." You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capactiy changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project. NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which vou have oreviouslv been aiven a NOTICE similar to this or as to which the statute of limitations has oreviouslv otherwise exoired. , t J. FOR OFFICE USE 0)1} Y n PLAN CHECK Noi:Zl{O/-/o!/ PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF -CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT EST. VAL.---------- 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008 -·u3oaf8a7 ~ ·. r11~~RC!PE~TNFOeli•A?fiOV-"':;~·"''! \n~~'Wno/: ~ .. ;~:;-~--;r:;.~-:.·: "-~'"\'. <~ .~f ;_~:-~:,-,::~;77~t~·iey~~~~t1f ~h,¾_Z?.,?:S:: -~-----PA-imi#i, ·:aijae)f/JA~~--=•-<a-",rt£~~-pi~PE7clf Address (include Bldg/Suite #) • ,-· Business Name (at this address) Legal Description Lot No. S\,Jbdivision Name/Number Unit No: Phase No. Total # of units Assessor's Parcel # Existing Use Proposed Use Name Address City State/Zip Telephone# '.!V-~~t)iiioe'ER:ft,-~0:.~'tiliij::j:-;t;' Naine AddrtiSS City S.tate/Zip Telephone#' r~~;s:~--~Q.QNfmf(i;tQB~ffiMrt\~~ij~~-s~ii':}~:;1::;~;~_:;7;;:r,~;r(~~~~i;~£~:J:~20i~~~~i~~~~?Zit~J:~~-[~~At:t:ir1Rt~q~~~!~~7;~~lt -. (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Coc;te: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its i_ssuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant. to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law [Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 o{ the Business and Professions Code] or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars [$500]). Name Address City State/Zip Telephone# State License # -----'-------License Class _________ _ City Business License # _______ _ Designer Name Address City State/Zip Telephone State License # ~--------- l&f07-lWAJ:l~~8}1f~M~~~lAIJP~~~:];;~:]~}-:::~x?~-~j~I;J::7:[~lF~:::~;;J:~£lfgf;J;~~Z}~~J;b7;IB~~~~~l;L~(1~;:f;l?J~~~:g~~!~LJ2?$ i;~4£:r:\·:;,;,~1~2{1t~-~-~::; Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: 0 I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to ~elf-i11sure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. D I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Insurance Company~-------------------Policy No·----~-------Expiration Date _______ _ (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS [$100] OR LESS) 0 CERTIFICA_TE-OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensatiqn. Laws of. California. WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage Is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), In addition to the cost of compens1;1tibn, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, Interest and attorney's fees. SIGNATURE. ____________________________ DATE ________ _ t~]~Q~ftE,Rt,~it)tgJ'.{~Q~~ffQJ'tL:·--· i~; ~;vk;;~?1~:~~-:-~~:~1t?21~~st.Jtl:21itr£t1?l}f~::;~":f_rt:'~j~~;~:~?~~J;1i~%~&.;{'f1?::i>~~~~:-~~~ &-~.11l/i12~.:~;1 :;,~t\~~t~fa;*l\';~,,i~ I hereby affirm that I am exempt'from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: ·. D I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his owri employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. if, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year-of completion, the owner-builder-will have the burden·of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). · 0 I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts ·for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). D I am-exempt under Section ______ Business and Professions Code for·this reason: 1. i personally plan to provide the major labor and materials·for construction of the proposed property improvement. 0 YES ONO 2. I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. 3. I have contracted ,with the following· person (firm) to provide the proposed con'struction (include name·/ address i phone number/ contractors license number): 4, I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone number/ contractors license number): __ -'-__ ·------------------------------------------ 5. I will provide some of the w,ork, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type of work):._,.. _______________________________________________________ _ PROPERTY.OWNER SIGNATURE ______ ,....,. ___ --,------,-------DATE_-,-______ _ t§.QMfi[~ffi~~=qtrqrJF1:q_'ij:'«Q#'f8l.$l/i.S.1:11.~ll~~~-,m~~ti~~z;~;.~~i!f?£:?:?:am~\2~'"l8:iiJ:'.'.~i.J~;,.~Q~e;~w:~rt~~t Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program 4nder Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act7 D YES O NO Is the applicant or future 1:>uilding occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollutioo control district or air quality management district? D YES O NO Is the faciiiW to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? 0 YES O NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CON'(ROL DISTRICT. I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097(i) Civil Code). LENDER'S NAME~.,.....'-------------LENDER'S ADDRESS ________________________ _ ~k~~v;,;~,t~AS~it)tt;~~TJ~C;A,llQ;t,;s-r;;:::1-;;;:-;}]~:J:~tG~~~E,~~~7??~~:f-:f:1~2:'i-~_::~tt'~~hi:~4.?:t~~~~],3~~~~~~~:~i~}~;:~J;7;~~~3;~ I ~ertify that I h~ve read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the infprmation on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the Citt of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection_ purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KE,EP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN P.,NYWAV ACCRUE AGAINST SAIP CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0" deep and demolition or construction-of structures over 3 stories in height. EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced with· 1 BO days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is c r riod of 180 days (Secti?n 106.4.4 Unifor · ding Code). ){ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE ---db.:~~=======~~~::::::=--£------------ WHITE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance L l EsGH Corporation '1.n Partne,rs/i.ip Wit/i. (Jovernme.nt for '13uiUing Safetg DATE: 8/30/01 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-4807rev PROJECT ADDRESS: 2075 Las Palmas PROJECT NAME: MODETEK Inc. T.I. Revision SET:IV ANT . REVIEWER D FILE D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where.necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. ~ The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. D The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans a~~, sLJt;lmitted for recheck. ' . . ·~-~· D The applicant's copy of the check list i~renclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. D The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: [8] Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. D Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone#: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person [8] REMARKS: All sheets of the plan shall be signed by the person responsible for their preparation. By: David Yao Enclosures: original approved set Esgil Corporation . D GA D MB D EJ D PC 8/22 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858) 560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 • _J EsGH Corporation 'J.n Partnersli.ip witli. <]ovemment for '.Builaing Safety DATE: 8/6/01 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-4807 rev(PCR0l-124) ,PROJECT ADDRESS: 2075 Las Palmas PROJECT NAME: MODETEK INC. T.I. .Revision SET: II CJ APPLICANT ~ CJ PLAN REVIEWER CJ FILE D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. D The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. ~ The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. cg] The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Michele Kush 3970 Sorrento Valley Blvd., Suite H, .San Diego, CA 92121 D Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. cg] Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Michele Kush (--J. i--,\) · ·Telephone#: (858)457-6860 Date contacted: ~ 1 '1-/ O I (by: lel-. ) Fax #: - Mail ....-"felephone/ Fax· · In Person 0 REMARKS: · ~y: David Yao :;\-. _, Esgil Corporation Enclosures: ·ro GA .: o Ms o EJ o pc 7/26 . , . trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858) 560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 J ') l l Carlsbad 00-4807 rev(PCR0l-124) II 8/6/01 RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: Carlsbad rev(PCR0l-124) PROJECT ADDRESS: 2075 Las Palmas DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 7/26 REVIEWED BY: David Yao FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-4807 SET: II DATE RECHECK COMPLETED: 8/6/01 This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Buildiqg Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans Will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. • Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted ih one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Suilding Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. A. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. ') l J Carlsbad 00-4807 rev(PCR0l-124) II 8/6/01 8. The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews. The original correction number has been given for your reference. In case you did not keep a copy of the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding corrections. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items. C. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there· are other changes, please briefly describe them. and where they are located on the pl~ns. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? DYes DNo :.1 Carlsbad 00-4807 rev(PCR0l-.124) II 8/6/01 + PLUMBING, MECHANICAL AND ENERGY CORRECTIONS + PLAN REVIEWER: Glen Adamek 1. This review of the mechanical system does not include the requirements of the future proposed Fab area, H-6 occupancy area under plan check #01- 1811. This mechanical system will need to be reviewed again to be updated to the requirements for the future proposed Fab area, H-6 occupancy. 2. The existing approved plan sheets not being changed under this plan review number 00-4607 does not match the proposed plan changes. Please correct so the final revised plans agree. Please make the proposed revisions to all sheets of the plans to agree: A) The Plans and the "Fire Protection/Life Safety Report for Modetek Phase 2" by Schirmer Engineering Corporation" do not clearly state the locations of the storage or the use of each of the hazardous materials listed in the report. It is not clear as to which exhaust ventilation system is to be used for exhausting which materials. Please address. B) The approved plan~ Clearly states "There will be no hazardous materials under this permit." See sheet EX-3A of the approved plans. No response and no new sheet EX-3A? C) The approved plans for plan check number 00-4607 clearly show the manufacturing lab to be under a separate permit. No response? D) The floor plans on the approved plans for plan check number 00-4607 does not match the new backgrounds for the revised mechanical plans. No response? i) The fir~ rated corridors do not match. ii) The approved plans clearly show the area of the new exhaust system is not apart of the permit. F) The plans do not show the required exhaust ventilation taken from near the floor or required fume hoods as per the "Fire Protection/Life Safety Report for Modetek Phase 2" by Schirmer Engineering Corporation" in areas where Class I, 11, or Ill-A liquids are being used. No response? G) The plans do not show the ovens for curing resins and hardener packages, as per the report. (Ovens are not apart of the permit package?) No response? 3. Ventilation air supply shall be ~µfficient to provide make-up air for exhaust systems when required by this code or the Building Code. Make-up air systems shall be electrically interlocked with their associated exhaust systems. UMC, Section 402.4. The mechanical plans by Abtech's are not apart of this plan package? ,; l. J 41 Carlsbad 00-4807 rev(PCR0l-124) II 8/6/01 4. The fire rated corridors are not to be used to convey air to or from rooms. UMC Section 601.1.1 One response states no fire rated corridors and the other states fire rated corridors serve the non-office areas. Please correct? 5. As per UMC, Section 404.1, #8. Return air shall not be obtained from a corridor, exit passageway or exit enclosure required by the Building Code to be of fire .. resistive construction.· one response states no fire rated corridors and the other states fire rated corridors serve the non-office areas. Please correct? 6. Detail exhaust ventilation system compliance with UMC Chapters 5 & 6 A) Detail the required make-up air as per UMC, Section 505.6. The mechanical plans by Abtech's are not apart of this plan package? 8) Detail the exhaust outlet clearances as per UMC, Sections 504.6 & 505.9. Clearly call out proposed clearances on the plans. Scaling the exhaust outlet clearances off the plans is not acceptable. Please correct. · C) Clearly show the type of material to be exhausted by each exhaust system. The Plahs.and the "Fire Protection/Life Safety Report for Modetek Phase 2" by Schirmer Engineering Corporation" do not clearly ·state the locations of the storage or the use of each of the hazardous materials listed in the report. It is not clear as to which exhaust ventilation system is to be used for exhausting which . materials. Please address. D) Clearly show the duct materials are suitable for the intended use. UMC, Section 609.1. The "Fire Protection/Life Safety Report for Modetek Phase 2" by Schirmer Engineering Corporation" only addresses the flammable and combustible liquid dilution ventilation and the type of ducting for the flammable and combustible liquid fumes. None of the other types of materials being exhausted are clearly addressed as to the type of ducting material. Check the duct systems used with the Corrosives, Water reactive and Unstable materials. And provide data on the 304 stainless steel ducting material. See item # 6.C) above. What is exhausted by each system is still not clear. E) Clearly show the exhaust duct material and gage u_sed for each duct size. See UMC, Table 5-B & 5-C. The plans do not clearly show the duct Class and reinforcment Spacing to be used for each system for use of UMC, Table 5-8 & 5-C F) Separate and distinct systems shall be provided for incompatible materials. UMC, Sections 505.2. As per the response the flammable and combustible liqui~ fumes are being exhausted by the "Solvent Exhaust System" and all other materials are exhausted by the "Chemical Exhaust System". This seems to put incompatible materials in the "Chemical Exhaust System". Please address and correct. Please provide a copy of the material safety data sheets (MSDS) for each of the proposed materials. t .1 Carlsbad 00-4807 rev(PCR0l-124) II 8/6/01 L) As per the "Fire Protection/Life Safety Report for Modetek Phase 2" by Schirmer Engineering Corporation" response the flammable and combustible liquid fumes are being used and dispensed only under operating fume hoods. Clearly note on the plans and show the lo~ations and designs of the proposed fume hoods as per the "Report." Note: If you have any questions regarding this plumbing, mechanical and energy plan review list please contact Glen Adamek at (858) 560-1468. To speed the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans. . ..,_ DATE: 7 /5/01 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad EsGil Corporation 1n Parttursfiip witli (jove.mment for 'lJuiUing Safe.tg PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-4807rev -pc. '1<._()//'2. 4 SET: II PROJECT ADDRESS: 2075 Las Palmas PROJECT NAME: MODETEK Inc. T.I. Revision ~ NT . EVIEWER D FILE 0 The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. D The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff . . D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. ~ The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. '~ The applicant's copy of the check list has been Sent to: Michele Kush 3970 Sorrento Valley Blvd. Suite H, San Diego, CA 92121 D Es_gil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. ~ Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Michele Kush C v, ~) Telephone#: (858)457-6860 ext 18 Date contacted: t / <P lo r (by: f'-.. ) Fax #: Mail/T~lephone/ Fax In Person D REMARKS: By: David Yao Enclosures: Esgil Corporation l8I GA D MB D EJ D PC ~/2,6 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858) 560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad 00-4807rev II 7/5/01 RECHl;:CK PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 2075 Las Palmas DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 6/26 · :REVIEWED BY: David YaQ FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-4807rev SET: II DATE RECHECK COMPLETED: 7/5/01 This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items listed need clarification; modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. A. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave.,. Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, _CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver.all remaining . sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, En~ineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. B. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. C. The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews. The original correcti9n number has been given for your reference. In case you did not keep a copy of Carlsbad 00-4807rev II 7/5/01 the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding corrections. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items. D. Please indicate here .if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? OYes ClNo ') t · .. ) Carlsbad 00-4807rev II 7/5/01 + PLUMBING, MECHANICAL AND ENERGY CORRECTIONS + JURISDICTION: Carlsbad DATE: 7/5/01 + PLAN REVIEW NUMBER: 00-4607Rev (PCR0l-124) + PLAN REVIEWER: Glen Adamek SET: II Only the "Fire Protection/Life .Safety Report for Modetek Phase 2" by Schirmer Engineering Corporation dated June 1, 2001, was provided for this review and does not match the Plans for plan check number 00-4607 being revised. Other sheets of the approved plans #00-4607must be revised proposed revisions. 1. This review of the mechanical system does not include the requirements of the future proposed Fab area, H-6 occupancy area under plan check # 01- 1811. This mechanical system will need to be reviewed again to be updated to the requirements for the future proposed Fab area, H-6 occupancy. 2. The "Fire Protection/Life .Safety Report for Modetek Phase 2" by Schirmer Engineering Corporation dated June 1, 2001 is incomplete and does not match. the Plans for plan check number 00-4607 being revised: A) B) C)- D) E) F) G) The "Report" does not clearly state the locations of the storage or the use of each of the hazardous materials listed in the report. The approved plans clearly states "There will be no hazardous materials under this permit." See sheet EX-3A of the approved plans. The approved plans for plan check number 00-4607 clearly show the manufacturing lab to be under a separate permit. The floor plans on the approved plans for plan check number 00-4607 does not match the new backgrounds for the revised mechanical plans. i) The fire rated corridors do not match. ii) The approved plans cl~arly show the area of the new exhaust system is not apart of the permit. The "Report" does not clearly list the incompatible materials requi_red to be separated and plans do not show not the required separations. The plans do not show the incompatible materials minimum distance separations; or noncombustible partition separations; or hazardous material storage cabinets; or gas cabinets as per the "Report". The plans do not show the required exhaust ventilation taken from near the floor or required furn~ hoods as per the "Report" in areas where Class I, 11, or Ill-A liquids are being used. The plans do not show the ovens for curing resins and hardener packages, as per the report. (Ovens are not apart of the permit package?) } l ;.J Carlsbad 00-4807rev II 7/5/01 3. Ventilation air supply shall be sufficient to provide make-up air for exhaust systems when required by this code or the Building Code. Make-up air systems shall be electrically interlocked with their associated exhaust systems. UMC, Section 402.4 No response provided and not change in the plans? 4. The fire rated corridors are not to be used to convey air to or from rooms. UMC Section 601.1.1 No response provided and not change in the plans? 5. As per UMC, Section 404.1, #8-. Return air shall not be obtained from a corridor, exit passageway or exit enclosure required by the Building Code to be of fire- resistive construction. No response ,provided and not change in the plans? 6. Detail exhaust ventilation system compliance with UMC Chapters 5 & 6. No response provided and not change in the plans? a) Detail the required make-up air as per UMC, Section 505.6. b) Detail the exhaust outlet clearances as per UMC, Sections 504.6 & 505.9. c) d) e) f) g) h) i) j) k) I) Clearly show the type of material to be exhausted by each exhaust system. Clearly show the duct materials are suitable for the intended use. UMC, Section 609.1 Clearly show the exhaust duct material and gage used for each duct size. See UMC, Table 5-B & 5-C. Separate and distinct systems shall be provided for incompatible materials. UMC, Sections 505.2 Detail ducts conveying explosives or flammable vapors, fumes or dusts shall extend directly to the exterior of the building without entering other spaces. UMC, Section 505.1. Detail duct cleanouts as per UMC, Section 609.4. Detail duct support as per UMC, Section 609.6. Detail fire protection as per UMC, Section 609. 7. Detail clearances from combustibles as per UMC, Sections 609.8 & 609.8.1. , Detail protection from physical damage as per UMC, Section 609.9. Note: If you have any questions regarding this plumbing, mechanical and energy plan -review list please contact Glen Adamek at (858) 560-1468. To speed the review process, note on this list (or a 9opy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans. · EsGil Corporation 1.n Partnersli.ip wit/i. (jovemment for '.Builaing Safety DATE: 6/20/01 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad D PLAN REVIEWER D FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-4807 rev(PCR.01-12.4) SET: I PROJECT ADDRESS: 2075 Las Palmas PROJECT NAME: MODETEK Inc. T.I. Revision D The· plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. D The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. D· The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. ~ The check list transmitted herewith is for your information·. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the j~risdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. ' lZ! The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Mk:hele Kush 3970 Sorrento Valley Blvd. Suite H, San Diego, CA 92121 D Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the .applicant that the plan check has been completed. ~ Esgii Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Michele Kush ( v.HJ Telephone#: (858)457-6860 ext 18 Date contacted:~/ r:,,/o, (by:~) Fax #: Mail ~phonev Fax In Person D REMARKS: By: David Yao Enclosures: Esgil Corporation [81 GA D MB D EJ D PC 6/7 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858) 560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad 00-4807 rev(PCR0l-124) 6/20/01 . GENERAi,. PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: Carlsbad rev(PCR0l-124) PROJECT ADDRESS: 2075 Las Palmas DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 6/7 REVIEWED BY: David Yao FOREWORD (PLEASE READ}: PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-4807 DATE REVIEW COMPLETED: 6/20/01 This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The foll.owing items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the .approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any - state, county or city law. • Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to ·EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. • To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. Carlsbad 00-4807 rev(PCR0l-124) 6/20/0l • Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. lfthere are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have chan~es been made not resulting from this list? D Yes D No Carlsbad 00-4807 rev(PCROl-124) 6/20/01 + PLUMBING, MECHANICAL AND ENERGY CORRECTIONS + PLAN REVIEWER: Glen Adamek Oi.le.t !t.\JAffil,W l1·1S·OI 1. The revised mechanical plans provided are for Solvent Exhaust Systems for the proposed Fab area,--w-e-e.eet:teElfNW-11!H'e&Under plan check# 01-1811. Not for the all non-hazardous uses shown in plan check# 00-4807. To make this plan change a part of the non-hazardous use permit would required another plan change, plan review and permit to review the system to .comply with the requirements for the proposed Fab area, 11 6 eef\!r;,Ofle;' requirem~nl$-1,,,.1«.al 'De.\ e.TE'O. D, wA\+~MJ · ,... 2. Provide data on proposed hazardous material to be stored and used. UBC, Section 307 and UFC. a) Clearly show the types of hazardous material that are being stored or used, as per the UBC, Table 3-D and 3-E classifications. Provide the material safety data sheets (MSDS). b) Clearly show the amounts of each type of hazardous material to be stored and in use. c) Clearly show where in the buildings each type of hazardous material is being stored or used. d) Provide calculations for required containment in each area of the buildings, as per UBC, 307.2.5, e) Provide a written response. to show how Spill Control and Drainage are being handled as required in UBC, Sections 307.2.3 & 307.2.4. f) Provide the required manual shutoff control for ventilation equipment as per UBC, . Section 1202.2.3. g) For fumes or vapors that are heavier than air, exhaust shall be taken from a point within 12 inches of the floor. UFC, section 8003.18.2-5. 3. Ventilation air supply shall· be sufficient to provide make-up air for exhaust systems when required by this code or the Building· Code. Make-up air systems shall be electrically interlocked with their associated exhaust systems. UMC, Section 402.4 4. The fire rated corridors are not to be used to convey air to or from rooms. UMC Section 601.1.1 5. As per UMC, Section 404.1, #8. Return air shall not be obtained from a corridor, exit passageway or exit enclosure required by the Building Code to be of fire-resistive construction. 6. Detail exhaust ventilation system compliance with UMC Chapters 5 & 6. a) Detail the required make-up air as per UMC, Section 505.6. b) Detail the exhaust outlet clearances as per UMC, Sections 504.6 & 505.9. Carlsbad 00-4807 rev(PCROl-124) 6/20/01 c) Clearly show the type of material to be exhausted by ea_ch exhaust system. d) Clearly show the duct materials are suitable for the intended use. UMC, Section 609.1 e) Clearly show the exhaust duct material and gage used for each duct size. See UMC, Table 5-8 & 5-C. f) Separate and distinct systems shall be provided for incompatible materials. UMC, Sections 505.2 g) Detail ducts conveying explosives or flammable vapors, fumes or dusts shall extend directly to the exterior of the building without entering other spaces. UMC, Section 505.1. h) Detail duct cleanouts as per UMC, Section 609.4. i) Detail required explosion venting of dust collection systems as per UMC, Section 609.5. j) Detail duct support as per UMC, Section 609.6. k) D_etail fire protection as per UMC, Section 609.7. I) Detail clearances from combustibles as per UMC, Sections 609.8 & 609.8.1. m) Detail protection from physical damage as per UMC, Section 609.9. Note: If you have any questions regarding this plumbing, mechanical and energy plan review list please contact Glen Adamek at (858) 560-1468. To speed the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans. (, J Carlsbad 00-4807 rev(PCR0.1-124) 6/20/01 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad rev(PCR0l-124) PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-4807 PREPARED BY: David Yao DATE: 6/20/01 BUILDING ADDRESS: 2075 Las Palmas BUILDING OCCUPANCY:· B/F-1/H-6 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V-N BUILDING AREA. Valuation Reg. VALUE PORTION ( Sq. Ft.) Multiplier Mod. mechanical revision Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE Jurisdiction·Code cb By Ordinance Bldg. Permit Fee by Ordinance / ... / Plan Check Fee by Ordinance Type of Review: D Complete Review D Structural Only D Repetitive Fee 3 Repeats * Based on hourly rate Comments: D Other El . Hourly 1 I Hour * · Esgil Plan Review Fee ($) $108.941 $87.151 Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue.doc Carlsbad Fire Department 01124 , 1635 F9 raday Ave . . v.;., .. -~ C§rlsbad, CA 92008 Plan Review Requirements Category: Fire Prevention (760) 602-4660 Date of Report: .,...09_1_05_/2_0_0_1 ------'----- ·Building Plan Reviewed by: Name: Lund Vandruff-Kush Address: 3970 Sorrento Valley Bl Suite H City, State: San Diego CA 92121 Plan Checker: Job#: 01124 ------- Job Name: Bldg #: PCR01124 ----------------~-Modetek Job Address: 2075 Las Palmas Ste. or Bldg. No. LJ Approved LJ Approved Subject to IZI Incomplete Review FD Job# The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and / or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes and standards. Please review carefully all comments attached as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. · The item you have submitted for review has been approved subject to the attached conditions. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. Please resubmit to this office the necessary plans and / or specifications required to indicate compliance with applicable codes and standards. The item you have submitted for review is incomplete. At this time, this office cannot adequately conduct a review to determine compliance with the applicable codes and / or standards. Please review carefully all comments attached. Please resubmit the necessary plans and / or specifications to this office for review and approval. 1st 01,124 2nd FD File# 3rd Other Agency ID Requirements Category: Building Plan . ) . Requirement: Pending 05.32 Additional Requirements or Comments "(.!~ :!~ { i Page 1 1 .. Identify which materials are HPMs. 2. Are fume hoods classified as product-conveying? 3. The F-1 square footage described in the technical report does not match the square footage on _ the submitted plan. 4. Where are the compressed gases stored? Are they to be piped in as described in the previous report? How and where is the silane stored? Where are the hazardous materials stored? 5. Describe the fire protection to be provided (ie, fire alarm systems, etc.) The-report should clearly state that Modetek's operations are using and storing materials below exempt quantities. Therefore, the use requirements and fire protection system requirements described in the previoulsy approved technical report do not apply. 09/05/01 I I I I I I 1. I I I I I I I I I I I I SCHIRMER ENGINEERING CORPORATION 11770 BERNARDO PLAZA COURT, SUITE 116 A SAN DIEGO, CA 92128 A PHONE (858) 673-5845 A FAX (858) 673-5849 FIRE PROTECTION/LIFE SAFETY REPORT FOR MODETEK PHASE 2 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA Prepared For: Mr. Dexter Humphrey Modetek Inc. 1990 Scenic Ridge Chino Hills, California 91709 SEC Project No. 2001013-001 June 1, 2001 (Revised July 25, 2001) · No.2 This report is the property of Schirmer Engineering Corporation. Copies retained by the client shall be utilized only for this use and occupancy ofthe project, not for the purpose of construction of any other projects. Fire Protection Engineering • Code Consulting • Loss Control • Security Consulting I ~ Ii :I I I I ,I I I I I I ,,_ I I I .I ·1 .I Modetek Carlsbad, California TABLE OF CONTENTS June 1, 2001 (RE:V 7-25-01) SEC Project No. 2001013-001 INTRO-DUCTION ................................................................................................................. 1 APPLICABLE CODES .............................•.......................................................................... 1 BUILDING DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................. 1 OCC-UPANCY ..................•..... '! •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 3 CONSTRUCTION AND FIRE-RESISTANCE RATINGS ..........••.•............................•.••.................... 3 ALLOWABLE AREA ..•...••••••.•...•.......................................•...............................•...••................ 3 ALLOWABLE HEIGHT •.......•.•.•.•.••.•.....•.........•.•..••...•............•••...........••••................................ 4 i;"fRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS ............. , ......................................................... .4 · HAZA~DOUS MATERIAL STORA~E AND USE REQUIREMENTS .................................. 4 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS .•.... : ............................................................................................ 6 FLAMMABLE & COMBUSTIBLE LIQUJDS .................................................................................. 7 MECHANICAL VENTILATION ............................................................................................ 7 CONC~USION ..................................................................................................................... 8 INDEX OF TABLES TABLE 1. CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................. 3 TABLE 2. FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS ......................................................... .4 APPENDICES APPENDIX A -HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SUMMARY APPENDIX B -HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INVENTORY APPENDIX C-CHEMICALS PER WORKSTATION I I :I. ·I I I I I ·I I I I I·· I I I I I I Modetek Carlsbad, California INTRODUCTION 1 June 1, 2001 (REV 7-25-01) SEC Project No. 2001013-001 Modetek is proposing to begin small-scale production of semiconductor wafers at the building located at 2075 Las Palmas Drive in Carlsbad, Cali~ornia. This limited production will be confined to the Group F, Division 1 (F-'1) Occupancy. The office areas will also be in use at this time. These initial operations are to be started using under exempt amounts of chemicals. The intent is to begin production in this area while remaining an F-1 Occupancy. Schirmer Engineering has been retained to provide an evaluation of the fire protection and life safety requirements applicable to the proposed occupancy. Specifically, this report will address hazardous materials and general building requirements due to assembly and testing of semiconductor wafers . APPLICABLE CODES The following codes were us~d in preparing this report: • California Building Code (CBC) -1998 Edition • California Fire Code (CFC) -1998 Edition • California Mechanical Code (CMG) -1998 Edition • , National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 13, Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems, 1996 Edition • California Fire Code (CFC),· Standard 79-3, Identification of the Health, Flammability and Reactivity of Hazardous Materials, 1998 Edition • National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 45, Standard on Fire Protection for Laboratories , Using Chemicals, 1996 Edition. BUILDING DESCRIPTION For initial operations, Modetek-will occupy the entire 23,532 square foot building with office (Group B) and manufacturing (Group F, Division 1) occupancies. See Figure 1, Floor Plan, for layout of the building. .. . I , .I I I I I I I I I I I I I i § I i f 'I'. j "' I ~ .} f j I ¾ 1 t l I i tt i FLOOR PLAN I [ if -~ LUND _ YANDRUFF ! KUSH 3171 SO 11 EI I 0 IA l l E Y I l I l ~ I 11 1 11 / E G O N fALIFIIIII Elllll B -Ill -1111 F I I , B -157 -llll ; I I INHRIOR DUI GN i • srACE I rLANNING i -'-- : ! i ~ i I ~ . I.....,..._ r·=-! A OC.QMX : A. OMM,t : A =A-- i A =A-- ! A ! =6 __ 6 -':'A __ 6 • ..,.6 __ A _..,,, -- -: _,....: 10 -·-CT ,..,.. -EX-5 ... - I I I I' I ,I I I I I I I I-- I I I I I I Modetek Carlsbad, California 3 June 1, 2001 (REV 7-25-01) SEC Project No. 2001013-001 An area utilization of the facility is as follows: . . • Offices (Group 8) -21,464 square feet • Wafer Assembly (Group F, Division 1) -2,068 square feet OCCUPANCY The facility will be used for executive, administrative, research and development, engineering offices, and assembly and electrical testing of semiconductors. Automatic tools will be used to apply adhesives, place components, plate, etch, and oven cure products. Within the electrical testing areas, the furnished wafers will be subjected to functional tests. Epoxy gluing and etching will be performed on the wafers as necessary. Final qualification of the semiconductors will be performed using thermal shock equipment. CONSiRUCTION AND FIRE-RESISTANCE RATINGS The facility will comply with the CBC requirements for Type V Non-rated construction. The required exterior wall and opening protection for Group 13, Group F, Division 1 and Group S, Division 1 oc_cupancies is cor:npliant as summarized in Table 1, Construction Requirements. All corridors will be of one-hour fire-resistive construction except in business occupancy areas serving less than 100 persons (CBC Section 1004.3.4.3). I 1 C Tabe •. f R onstruc 10n eqµ1rements Construction Fire Resistance Rating Requirement Exterior Bearina Wall One-hour less than 20 feet, NR elsewhere Exterior Non-bearinQ Wall Same as bearina Opening Protection Openings not permitted less than 5 feet, protected less than 1 O feet NR -Non-rated ALLOWABLE AREA The building has a total area of 23,532 square feet. Since the facility has two yards over 60 feet and the entire facility is protected throughout with an automatic sprinkler system, the allowable area requirements are satisfied. Yards that are a minimum of 60 feet are those in the north and west directions. I ,. I I 1· I I· I I I I I I I· 'I I I I I I Modetek Carlsbad, California 4 ALLOWABLE HEIGHT June 1, 2001 (REV 7-25-01) SEC Project No. 2001013-001 The allowable height for a building with Type V Non-rated construction with Group B and F-1 Occupancies is 40 feet (CBC Table 5-B). The maximum height of the building is approximately 22 feet. Therefore, the requirements for allowable height are satisfied. FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS The fire suppression requirements, based on occupancy are summarized in Table 2, Fire Suppression System Requirements. T bl 2 F' S a e . ire uppress1on s t R iys em t equ1remen s Occllparicy Type of Sprinkler Temperature/ Required Sprinkler 'Design Reference System Orifice Size Crit~ria (0.F/inch) Offices, Wet 165/ 1/2 Light Hazard -0.1 O gpm/sq.ft. NFPA 13, Reception, anc;I over most remote 1,500 sq.ft. Figure 5- Restrooms 2.3 Manufacturing Wet 286/ 17/32 Ordinary Hazard Group 2 -NFPA 13, 0.20 gpm/sq.ft. over most Figure 5- r'3"mote 1,500 sq.ft. 2.3 The existing building is equipped with a sprinkler system designed to provide a density of 0.33 ·gpm/sq.ft. for the most.remote 3,000 square feet. The existing system is therefore adequate for the intended use. Bel.ow suspended ceiling spaces will be protected with sprinklers designed as presented in Table 2, Fire Suppression System Requirements. Sprinklers will be installed in ducts conveying flammable vapors (CMC Section 609.7). HAZARDOUS MATERIAL STORAGE AND USE REQUIREMENTS Th.e area occupied by Modetek will be treated as one control area as defined in CBC, Section 204. The quantities.of hazardous material used and stored within the control area will be below the exempt amounts as defined in the CBC and CFC (see Appendix A, Hazardous Material Summary). A list of the hazardous materials to be used and stored within the F-1 portion of the facility is shown in Appendix B, Hazardous Materials Inventory. All hazardous materials will be used in all lab rooms including the prefabricated lab. All storage of these materials will be at the workstations (see Figure 2, Equipment Plan for location of workstations). A list of chemicals and their quantities at each workstation is provided in Appendix C. Storage, dispensing, use I , I I I I ·I I I I I I .1 I I ' ~ I § 1 I t ! i! fo " I ! ~ 'J j ~ § I ~ • ' ;i ., " I ~ " ! :i g I ): • j ' ._/, ; ' . .... ·-......., •• .;:i / . r >,,,,.,,,,/ /EXISTIN6 ~~;,,.,,, ST~ \---l£l EXISTIN6 I.AB !tboel ·1 . . . . . . " " .,, . . . " " " /'; f ......_..,_,1., LA6/ CLEANROOM EGUIPMENT FLAN . . . s . . . f/3 ~ . I ~ lUND VAN DR HF ~u~ ]Ill $011£110 IHLET IL Ii S U I l E N S A I D I E I 0 CALlf0IIIA 11121 l E 151 • 157 • 1111 f A 151 • 157 • 1112 INTERIOR DUI GN SPACE PlANNING I ,, ~ii i ll ~ ~L • i §~; l:t I z i I i -I i ~ i ! I -·-• -I:,. I:,. I:,. I:,. I:,. I:,. I:,. A A A I:,. A I:,. I:,. I:,. I:,. A -""' --..... ~.r-o- _,.LH ... : ..... -Tl-5A sr,. ,._,.. I I I I I I I I I I I I I· I I I I I I -, Modetek Carlsbad, C~lifomia 6 June 1, 2001 (REV 7-25-01) SEC Project No. 2001013-001 and handling hazardous ·materials in quantities not exceeding exempt amounts shall be in . accordance with Section 8001 (CFC Section 8001.15.1 ). GENERAL REQUIREMENT~ The general safeguards required for· the use and storage of hazardous materials in non- hazardous occupancies are as follows: • Design and construction -of containers, cylinders and tanks: Containers shall be designed and constructed in accordance with nationally recognized standards (CFC Section 8001.4.1). • Suitability of equipment, machinery and processes: Equipment, machinery and processes used for dispensing, use or handling shall b_e approved, listed or designed and constructed ·in accordance with approved standards for intended use. Such equipment, machinery and processes shall be maintained in an operable condition (CFC Section 8001 .4.4). • Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS): MSDS shall be readily available on the premises for all hazardous materials regulated by Article 80 (CFC Section 8001.6). • Identification Signs: Visible hazard identification signs as specified in UFC Standard 79-3 shall be placed at entrances to the locations where hazardous materials are stored, dispensed, used or handled in quantities requiring a permit. Individual containers, cartons or packages shall be conspicuously marked or labeled in accordance with nationally recognized standards (CFC 8001. 7). • Separation of Incompatible Materials: Incompatible materials in storage and storage of materials incompatible with materials in u~e shall be separated when the stored materials are in containers having a capacity of more than 5 pounds or ½ gallon. Hydrogen peroxide will be separated from all metals, alcohols, acetone, and all other flammable liquids or combustible materials. Oxygen will also be separated from all flammable liquids, gases and solids. I I I I I I I I ·I I I I 1- 'I I I I I I Modetek Carlsbad, California 7 June 1, 2001 (REV 7-25-01) SEC Project No. 2001013-001 • Separation shall be accomplished by the following: (CFC Section 8001.11.8) 1. Segregating incompatible material storage by a distance of not less than 20 feet. . 2. Isolating incompatible material storage by a noncombustible partition extending not less than 18 inches above and to the sides of the stored material. 3. Storing liquid and solid material in hazardous materials storage cabinets. 4. Storing compressed gases in gas cabinets or exhausted enclosures. FLAMMABLE & COMBUSTIBLE LIQUIDS Small quantities of acetone, isopropyl alcohol, methanol (Class I-B liquids) and.chlorobenzene (Class I-C liquid) will be used in the F-1 area to -clean wafers. Hexamethyldisilaze (Class I-B liquid) and Polimide _(Class 111-B liquid) will be used to apply polymer films on the wafers. Angstrombond 9001-MT Hardener and Resin, Angstromoond AB 9112 Hardener and Resin, Epo Tek 302-1 Part A and B, Epo Tek 353 Part B, Epo Tek H20E Parts A and B, Norland 61, and Norland 81 (Class 111-B liquids) will be dispensed into packages where the wafers will be placed. These packages will then be put into the oven to cure. Small scale production in the F-1 area will be under fume hoods. Electrical wiring and .equipment shall be .installed and maintained in accordance. with the Electrical Code in areas where flammable and combustible liquids are used. Locations where flammable vapor/air mixtures could exist under normal operations shall be classified as Class I, Division 1 when the area is within five feet of any edge of the equipment and Class I, Division 2 when the area is between five feet and eight feet of any edge of the equipment, extending in all directions (CFC Table 7901 .4-A). Laboratory use of acetone and isopropyl alcohol in 500 ml spill-proof pump dispenser bottles is not considered applicable to these requirements. MECHANICAL VENTILATION. CBC Section 1202.2.2 requires that in areas where Class I, II, or Ill-A liquids are used, mechanical exhaust shall be provided in sufficient quantities to produce six air changes per hour. The mechanical exhaust shall be taken at or near floor level. The intent of this requirement is to provide dilution ventilation such that the amount or vapors liberated from the flammable or combustible liquids would not be sufficient to cause an explosion or fire. Since I I I I I I I I Modetek Carlsbad, California 8 June 1, 2001 (REV 7-25-01) SEC Project No. 2001013-001 most flammable or combustible liquids are heavier than air, the requir~ment to locate exhaust inlets at or near floor level is intended to direct exhaust ventilation to the most likely area of vapor accumulation. In lieu of providing dilution ventilation, dispensing of all flammable and combustible liquids will be conducted within the F-1 area beneath fume hoods located over the work stations. The acetone and isopropyl alcohol will be dispensed from one-gallon containers into 500 ml spill- proof pump dispenser bottles. Use of the liquid will occur at the work station. The fume hood exhaust ventilation will be continuous and provide a velocity of 100 feet per second across the face of the fume hooqs. Ductwork from the fume hoods will be of galvanized steel lined with PVC (CMC Section 609.1 ). The potential for a liquid spill is minimized by the low usage, and even if a container is spilled, I the spill-proof lid will not allow chemical leakage. Any wipes used to clean products will be disposed of properly in designated flammable waste containers. I I I I I I I I I I CONCLUSION In conclusion, this facility will meet or exceed the requirements of the CBC, and CFC due to exceptional automatic sprinkler system and limited amounts of hazardous materials. Prepared by: SCHIRMER ENGINEERING CORPORATION Aaron Becker, M.S. Fire Protection Consultant AB:lc Reviewed by: SCHIRMER ENGINEERING CORPORATION Garner A. Palenske, P.E. Regional Engineering Manager Modetek Carlsbad,0-.Califomia June t, 2001 (REV 7-25-01) ------SEC Project No. 2001013-0_Q1 I most flamma~le or combustible liquids ~r~--"t,,$avier than -air, the requirement to locate exhaust inlets at or near floor level is intended to direct exhaust ventilation to the most likely area of ·1 I -, I I I :1 ·1 . , I· I I I I I I vapor accumulation. In lieu of providing dilution ventilation, dispensing of all flammable and combustible liquids will be conducted within the F-1 area beneath fume hoods located over the work stations. The acetone and isopropyl alcohol will be dispensed from one-gallon containers into 500 ml spill- proof pump dispenser .bottles. Use of the liquid will occur at the work station. The fume hood exhaust VEli)tilation will be continuous and provide-a velocity of 100 feet per second across the face of the fume hoods. Ductwork from the fume hoods will be of 304 stainless steel (CMG Section 609.1 ). The potential for a liquid spill is minimized by the low usage, and even if a container is spilled, ' -- the spill~proof lid will not allow chemical leakage. Any wipes used to clean products will be disposed of properly in designated flammable waste containers. In -ci,ddition:_ all -fire· rated corridors throughout the building ·will not be used to convey air to or from rooms (UMC Section 601.1.1 ). Return air will not be obtained from fire rated corridors (UMC Section 404.1 ) . CONCLUSION In conclusion, this facility will meet or exceed the requirements of the CBC, and CFC due to exceptional automatic sprinkler system and limited amounts of hazardous materials. Prepared by: Reviewed by: SCHIRMER ENGINEERING CORPORATION SCHIRMER ENGINEERING CORPORATION a"="-:...,..,_......aa~Bij)......,,,_.. =~~frli~,L----'---_ 11}]£1 A ~L(PMhL L - Aaron Becker, M.S. Garner A. Palenske, P.E. Fire Protection Consultant Regional Engineering Manager AB:lc I I I I I :I I I I I I I I I-. ,, I I I I I APPENDIX A HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SUMMARY ------.. ---·-· -------- CAR Gas 702.000(cu ft) CAR Liauid 0.951 faal) CAR Solid 4.004Ob) CMD Solid .CL3B Liquid 3.763(gal) COR Liauid 19 .003 faal) FLIB Littuid 27.450(gal) FLlC Liauid l.251(gal) FS Solid 4.004Ob) IRR Liauid 33.5llfaal) NON Gas 3 392.000(cu ft NON Liauid l.250(gal) OHR Gas 702.000(cu ft' OHR Liauid 7.250foal) OGG Gas 1.053.000(cu ft' OX2 Liauid 2.250(gal) PYR Gas 2.701 (cu ft' SEN Liquid l.004(gal) SEN Solid 4.004(lb) TOX Liquid 11.752( gal) URI Gas 2.701 (cu ft UR2 Liauid 0.251 (gal) WRI Liauid 2.250foal) WR2 Liauid 2.250(gal) I WR2 Solid 4.004(lb) © 2001, Schirmer Engineering Corporation Modetek Fl Hazardous Materials Summary 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 1620 cu ft 2.000 ( cu ft' 1620 cu ft 2000 gal 0.201 (gal) 200001b 0.004 Ob) Not Limited 0.513 {gal) 1000 gal 2.253 (gal) 120 gal -3.450 (gal) 180 gal 0.251 foal) 250 lb Not Limited 4.511 (gal) Not Annlicable 12.000 (cu ft) Not Applicable Not Annlicable 0.250 (gal) 1620 cu ft 2.000 ( cu ft' · 1620 cu.ft Not Limited 1.250 (gal) 3000 cu ft 3.000 (cu ft' 3000 cu ft 50 gal 0.250 (gal) 50 cu ft 0.001 (cu ft 10 .cu ft Not Limited 0.004 (gal) Not Limited 0.004 (lb) 100 gal 1.252 (gal) Not Limited 0.001 (cuft' Not Limited 10 gal 0.001 foal) Not Limited 0.250 (gal) 10 gal 0.250 faal) 100 lb 0.004 (lb) 7/16/2001 Table 8001.15-B. footnote 5 500 gal Table ·8001.15-B. footnote 5 5000 lb Table 8001.15-B footnote 5. Not Limited Table 7902.5-A footnote 5 200 gal Table 8001.15-B, footnote 5 30 gal Tabie 7902.5-A. footnote 3 40 gal Table 7902.5-A. footnote 3 Table 8001.15-A footnote. 6 500 gal Table 8001.15-B Not Annlicable Not Aoolicable Not Annlicable Table 8001.15-B. footnote 5 500 gal Table 8001.15-B Table 8001.15-A footnote 6 10 gal Table 8001.15-A, footnote 6 Table 8001.15-A 500 gal Table 8001.15-B 5000 lb Table 8001.15-B 25 !!:al Table 8001.15-B. footnote 5 Table 8001.15-A 2 gal Table 8001.15-A. footnote 6 Not Limited Table 8001.15-A. footnote 11 2 !!:al Table 8001.15-A footnote 6 20 lb Table 8001.15-A. footnote 6 Page 1 of I I I, ), I I I I I I APPENDIX B I I HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INVENTORY -1 I I I· I I I -1 I I 1- 1 I I I I I I I I I I I· I I I I I I Modetek Fl Inventory 2075 Las Pa/mas Drive Carlsbad, CA =.,..,,.,..,..,,,,.,..,,,,.,,,,,,..,.,.. · Modetek00i Isopropy\ Alcohol FLlB,IRR Liquid Modetek002 Acetone FLlB,.IRR Liquid Modetek003 Isopropyl Alcohol FLlB,IRR Liquid 4.000 (gal) Modetek004 Acetone FLlB,IRR Liquid 4.000 (gal) Modetek0Q5 Norland 81 a) Mercapto Ester -Trade CL3B, IRR, IRR Liquid . Modetek006 Norland 61 a).Mercapto Ester-Trade CL3B, IRR Liquid Modetek00'7 Acetone FLlB, IRR Liquid Modetek008 Isopropyl Alcohol FLlB, IRR Liquid Modetek009 Methanol FLlB, IRR Liquid· Modetek010 Norland 81 a) Mercapto Ester-Trade CL3B, IRR Liquid 0.250 (gal) Modetek0il Norland 61 a) Mercapto Ester -Trade CL3B, IRR Liquid 0.250 (gal) Modetek012 Acetone FLlB, IRR Liquid 0.250 (gal) Modetek013 Isopropyl Alcohol FLlB,IRR L}quid 0.250 (gal) Modetek014 Methanol FLlB,IRR Liquid (gal) Modetek015. Norland 81 a) Mercapto Ester -Trade CL3B, IRR Liquid · Modetek0 i 6 Norland 61 a) Mercapto Ester-Trade CL3B, IRR Liquid Modetek017 Acetone FLlB, IRR Liquid Modetek018 Isopropyl Alcohol FLlB, IRR Liquid Modetek019 Methanol FLlB, IRR Liquid Modetek020 . Norland 81 a) Mercapto Ester-Trade CL3B, IRR Liquid 0.250 (gal) Modete~021 Norland 61 a) Mercapto Ester-Trade CL3B, IRR Liquid 0.250 (gal) Modetek022 Acetone FLlB, IRR Liquid 1.000 (gal) Modetek023 Isopropyl Alcohol FLlB, IRR Liquid 1.000 (gal) Modetek024 Methanol FLlB,IRR Liquid 1.000 (gal) Modetek025 , Angstrombond 900 I-MT Hardener a) CL3B, COR · Liquid Modetelc026 Angstrombond 9001-MT ~esin a) CL3B, IRR, SEN Liquid Modetek027 Angstrombond AB9112 Hardener a) CL3B, COR, SEN Liquid Modetek:028 Angstrombond AB9112 Resin a)Epox CL3B, IRR Liquid Modetek029 . Epo Tek 353ND, Part A a) Bisphenol IRR, SEN, TOX Liquid Modetek030 Epo Tek 353ND, Part B a)Imidazole b CAR, CL3B, IRR, TOX, UR'. Liquid Modetek031 Epo Tek B20E, Part A a) Silver Flake CL3B Liquid Modetek032 Epo Tek H20E, Part B a) Silver Flake CL3B Liquid Modetek033 Epo Tek 302-1, Part A a) Diglycidyl CL3B, FLlC, IRR, IRR, Sfil Liquid Modetek034 Epo Tek 302-1, Part Ba) no hazardou CL3B, COR Liquid Modetek035 Angstrombond 9001-MTHardener a) CL3B, COR Liquid 0.250 (gal) Modetek036 Angstrombond 900i-MT Resin a) CL3B, IRR, SEN Liquid 0.250 (gal) Modetek037 Angstrombond AB9112 Hardener a) CL3B, COR, SEN Liquid 0.250 (gal) Modetek038 Angstrombond AB9112 Resin a)Epox CL3B, IRR Liquid 0.250 (gal) Modetek039 Epo Tek 353ND, Part A a) Bisphenol IRR, SEN, TOX Liquid 0.250 (gal) Modetek040 Epo Tek 353ND, Part B a)Imidazole b CAR, CL3B, IRR, TGX, UR: Liquid 0.250 (gal) Modetek041 Epo Tek H20E, Part A a) Silver Flake CL3B Liquid 0.250 (gal) Modetek042 Epo Tek H20E, Part B a) Silver Flake CL3B Liquid 0.250 (gal) Modetek043 Epo Tek 302-1, Part A a) Diglycidyl CL3B, IRR, SEN Liquid 0.250 (gal) Modetek044 Epo Tek 302-1, Part Ba) no hazardou CL3B, COR Liquid 0.250 (gal) © 2001; Schirmer Engineering Corporation Monday, July 16, 2001 0.500 (gal) 0.500 (gal) 0.001 (gal) 0.001 (gal) 0.250 (gal) 0.250 (gal) 0.250 (gal) 0.001 (gal) 0.001 (gal) 0.250 (gal) 0.250 (gal) 0.250 (gal) 0.001 (gal) 0.001 (gal) 0.001 (gal) 0.001 (gal) 0.001 (gal) 0.001 (gal) 0.001 (gal) 0.001 (gal) 0.001 (gal) 0.001 (gal) Page 1 of 3 I I Modetek045 Hydrochloric Acid COR Liquid 0.250 (gal) Modetek046 Sulfuric Acid COR, TOX, WR2 Liquid 0.250 (gal) I M6detek047 AmmoD;ium Hydroxide IRR, TOX Liquid 0.250 (gal) Modetek049 Hydrofluorfo Acid COR,OHH Liquid 0.250 (gal) Modetek050 Phosphoric.Acid COR, OHH, TOX Liquid 0.250 (gal) I Modetek051' Citric Acid IRR Liquid 0.250 (gal) Modetek052 Hydrogen Bromide COR Liquid 0.250 (gal) Modetek053 Buffered Oxide Etch COR, QHH, TOX Liquid 0.250 (gal) I Modetek054 Hydrogen Peroxide COR,OX2 Liquid 0.250 (gal) Modetek055 Sodium Hydroxide COR, TOX, WRl Liquid 0.250 (gal) Modetek056 Potassium Hydroxide COR Liquid 0.250 (gal) I Modetek057 Hydrochloric Acid COR Liquid 2.000 (gal) Modetek058 Sulfuric Acid COR, TOX, WR2 Liquid 2.000 (gal) Modetek059 Ammonium.Hydroxi(le IRR, TOX Liquid 2.000 (gal) I Modetek061 Hydrofluoric Acid COR,OHH Liquid 2.000 (gal) Modetek062 Phosphoric Acid COR, OHH,.TOX Liquid 2.000 (gal) Modetek063 Citric Acid .IRR Liquid 0.250 (gal) I Moiletek064 Hydrogen Bromide COR Liquid 0.000 (gal) Modetek065 Buffered Oxide Etch COR, OHH, TOX Liquid 2.000 (gal) Modetek066 Hydrogen Peroxide COR, OX2 Liquid 2.000 (gal) I·, Modetek067 Sodium Hydroxide COR, TOX, WRl Liquid 2.000 (gal) Modetek068 Potassium Hydroxide COR Liquid 2.000 (gal) Modetek069 Acetone FLlB,iRR Liquid 0.250 (gal) I Mod_etek070 Methanol FLlB,IRR . Liqui.il 0.250 (gal) Mocletek072 Isopropyl Alcohol FLlB,IRR Liquid .0 .25 0 (gal) Modetek073 Chlorobenzene FLlC,IRR Liquid 0.250 (gal) I Modetek074 Acetone. FLlB,IRR Liquid 4.000 (gal) ModetekQ75 · Methanol FLl!3,IRR Liquid 4.000 (gal) Modetek077 Isopropyl Alcohol FLlB,IRR .. Liquid 4.000 (gal) I Modetek078 Chlorobenzefle FLlC,IRR Liquid 1.000 (gal) Modetek080 Nickel CAR, CMD, SEN Solid 0.001 (lb) Modetek081 Potassium Ferricyanide NON Liquid 0.250 (gal) I· Modetek083 Nickel CAR, CMD, SEN Solid 2.000 (lb) Modetek084 Potassium Ferricyanide ON Liquid 1.000 (gal) Modetek085 1 00o/o Silane · PYR, URI Gas 0.001 (cu ft) I· Modetek086 100%Silane PYR, URI Gas 2.700 (cu ft) Modetek088 Hexamethyldisilaze CAR,FLIB Liquid 0.100 (gal) Modetek089 Polimide · CL3B, IRR, OHH Liquid 0.250 (gal) I Modetek091 Hexamethyldisilaze CAR,FLlB Liquid 0.250 (gal) · Modetek092 Polimide C!,3B, IRR, OHH Liquid 0.000 (gal) Modetek094 Hexamethyldisilaze CAR,FLIB Liquid 0.100 (gal) I Modetek095 Polimide CL3B, IRR, OHH Liquid 0.250 (gal) Modetek097 Hexamethyldisilaze CAR,ELIB Liquid 0.250 (gal) Modetek098 Polirriide CL3B, IRR, OHH Liquid 0.000 (gal) I Modetek099 High Purity Nitrogen ON Gas 1.000 (cu ft) Modetekl00 Low Purity Nitrogen ON Gas 1.000 (cu ft) ModeteklOI Argon ON Gas 1.000 (cu ft) I Modetek102 Titanium FS;WR2' Solid 0.001 (lb) Modetekl04 ickel CAR, CMD, SEN Solid 0.001 (lb) I © 2001, Schirmer Engineering Corporation Page2 of 3 I I Modetek107 Low Purity Nitrogen NON Gas I Modetek108 Argon NON Gas 350.000 ( cu ft) Modetek109 Titanium FS, WR2 Solid 1.000 (lb) Modeteklll Nickel CAR, CMD, SEN Solid 1.000 (lb) I Modetek113 Carbon Tetrafluoride CAR,OHH Gas 1.000 (cu ft) Modetekll4 Sulfur Hexafluoride ON Gas 1.000 (cu ft) Modetek115 Oxygen OGG Gas 1.000 (cu ft) I . Modetekl 16 Argon NON Gas 1.000 (cu ft) Modetek117 High Purity Nitrogen NON Gas 1.000 (cu ft) Modetekl18 Low Purity Nitrogen NON Gas 1.000 (cu ft) I Modetekll9 · Carbon Tetrafluoride CAR,bHH Gas 350.000 (cu ft) Modetek120 Sulfur Hexafluoride NON Gas 350.000 (cu ft) Modetekl21 Oxygen OGG Gas 350.000 (cu ft) I Modetekl22 Argon NON Gas 350.000 ( cu ft) Modeiek123 High, Purity Nitrogen NON Gas 255.000 (cu ft) Modetekl24 Low Purity Nitrogen NON Gas 255.000 ( cu ft) I Modetek125 High Purity Nitrogen NON Gas 1.000 (cuft) Modetekl26 Low Purity Nitrogen NON Gas 1.000 ( cu ft) Modetek127 Oxygen OGG Gas 1.000 ( cu ft) I Modetekl28 Sulfer Hexafluoride NON Gas 1.000 (cu ft) Modetekl29 Carbon Tetrafluoride CAR,OHH Gas 1.000 (cu ft) Modetekl30 High Purity Nitrqgen Gas 255.000 (cu ft) I Modetekl31 Low Purity Nitrogen Gas 255.000 ( cu ft) Modetekl32 Oxygen. Gas 350.000 (cu ft) Modetekl33 St!lfer Hexafluoride Gas 350.000 (cu ft) I Modetek134 Carbon Tetrafluoride CAR,OHH Gas 350.000 (cu ft) · Modetekl35 Titanium FS, WR2 Solid 0.001 (lb) Modetekl36 Oxygen OGG. Gas 1.000 ( cu ft) I . Modetekl37 Titanium FS; WR2 Solid 1.000 (lb) Modetek138 Oxygen OGG Gas 350.000 ( cu ft) Modeiek139 'Nitrogen NON Gas 2.000 (cu ft) I· · Modetek140 Titanium FS, WR2 Solid 0.002 (lb) Modetek141 Nickel CAR, CMD, SEN Solid 0.002 (lb) Modetek144 Nitrogen ON Gas 450.000 (cu ft) I Modetek145 Titanium FS, WR2 Solid 2.000 (lb) Modetek:146 Nickel CAR, CMD, SEN Solid 1.000 (lb) I I I I I © 2001, Schirmer Engineering Corporation Page 3 of 3 I a_ , • I I I. I. I I APPENDIX C ·1 I CHEMICALS PER WORKSTATION I I I I- I 1· I I I I -... ---·---· -·---·--------Modet~k 1 Carlsbad, California Process Tool Process Description Associated Materials CHA-E-Beam MTL Deposits metal films Titanium (#1) Nickel CHAE-Beam Deposits dielectric films Nitrogen Dielectric Films (#2) Microscope Optical inspections (#4) Dektak (#5) Techniques Etch Etch's polymer films Hiah Puritv Nitroaen (#10). with 02· Low Purity Nitrogen Argon Carbon Tetrafluoride Sulfur Hexaflouride Oxygen Silane Solvent Hood Clean waters with Acetone (#26) solvents Methanol lsooroovl Alcohol Chemical Hood Etch's wafers with acids Hydrochloric Acid (#27) and bases · Sulfuric Acid Ammonium Hvdroxide Hydrofluoric Acid Phosphoric Acid · . Citric Acid Hydrogen Bromide Buffered Oxide Etch Hvdroaen Peroxide Sodium Hvdroxide Potassium Hydroxide Furnace Diffusion furnace for Titanium Titanium Oxygen Ovens Bake polymers (#29) Hot Plate Bake polymers (#30) Quantities In Use {Open System -Liquids) (Closed system -Gases) 0.003 lb 0:003 lb 2 cu ft 3 cu ft 3 cuft 2 cuft 2 cuft 2 cuft 2 cuft 0.001 cu ft Q.625 gal 0.325gal 0.625gal 0.25 gal 0.25 i:ial 0.25 gal 0.25 aal 0.25i:ial 0.25 gal 0.25 aal 0.25i:ial 0.25 gal 0.25 aal 0.25i:ial 0.001 lb 1 cu ft August22,2001 SEC Project No. 2001013-001 Quantities In Storage 31b 31b 450 cu ft 765 cu ft 765 cu ft 700 cu ft (Exterior) 700 cu ft (Exterior) 700 cu ft {Exterior) 700 cu ft (Exterior) 2.7 cu ft 4.125 gal 2.5gal 4.625 oal 2 gal 2i:ial 2gal 2aal 2gal 2gal 2 gal 2gal 2 gal 2aal 2gal 1 lb 350 cu ft (Exterior) ,:... ---· ---·---:--· --------Modetek 2 · Carlsbad, California Process Tool Process Description Associated Materials Spinner Coats polymers Photoresist (#33) Hexamethvldis1laze Polimide Nickel .. Potassium ·Ferricvanide Spinner Coats polymers Photoresist (#34) Hexamethvldisilaze . Polimide Nickel Potassium Fen;icvanide Microscope Optical inspections (#38) Mask Aligner Optical inspections (#40) Mask Aligner Optical inspections (#41) · Chemical Hood Lapping Station Angstrombond 900.1-MT Hardener . (#42) a) Aliphatic Amine Mixtiue b) Diethvlenetriarriine Arigstrombond 9001-MT Resin a) Epoxy Resin Blend -Proprietary b) Modified Silicon Dioxide -Proorietarv Angstrombond AB9112 Hardener a) Aliphatic Amine Mixture b) Deithvlenetriamine Angstrombond AB9112 Resin a) Eooxv Resin Blend -Proorietarv EPO Tek 353ND, Part A a) Bisohenol F EPO Tek 353ND, Part B a) lmidazole ' b) Acrvlonitrile EPO Tek H2OE, Part A a) Silver Flake 60% EPO Tek H2OE, Part B a) · Silver Flake 80% Quantities In Use (Open System -Liquids) (Closed system -Gases) 0.07 gal 0.1 aal 0.25 aal 0;0005 lb 0.125 gal 0.07 gal 0.1 aal 0.25.gal 0.0005 lb 0.125 aal 0.0005 gal 0.0005 gal 0.0005 gal 0.0005 gal 0.0005 gal 0.0005 gal. 0.0005 gal 0.0005 gal August22,2001 SEC Project No. 2001013-001 Quantities In Storage 0.75 gal 0.25 aal 0aal 0.5 lb 0.5gal 0.75 gal 0.25 gal Oaal 0.5 lb 0.5aal 0.125 gal 0.125 gal 0.125gal 0.125 gal 0.125 gal 0.125gal 0.125gal 0.125 gal ... ----· ----· ·----·------· Modetek Carlsbad, California Process Tool Process Description Chemical Hood Lapping Station (#42) (Continued) (Gontinued) Ghemical Hood Lapping Station (#43) Solvent Bench Cleans wafers with (#44) solvents Wire Bonder Bonds wire (#47) Work Bench (#49) Oven Cures epoxy glue (#50) Work Bench (#54) ·oven Cures epoxy glue (#55) Wire Bonder Bonds wire (#56). Ovens Cures epoxy glue (#57) Wire Bonder Bonds wire (#58) Wire Bonder Bonds wire (#59) Microscope Optical inspections (#62) Solder Station Solders wire (#63) Oven Cures epoxy glue (#64) Dicing Saw Cuts wafer (#66) Dicing Saw Cuts wafer (#68) 3 Associated Materials EPd Tek 302-·1,. Part A a) Dialycidyl Ether of Bisohenol-A EPO Tek 302-1, Part B a) No hazardous ingredients Norland 81 a) Mercaoto Ester -Trade Secret Norlane 61 a) Mercapto Ester-Trade Secret . Acetone Methanol lsopropyl Alcohol . \ .. Quantities In Use (Open System -Liquidsj {Closed svstem -G~ses) 0.0005 gal O:00d5 gal 0.002 gal 0.002 gal 0.625 i:ial 0.325 aal 0.625 aal · August 22, 2001 SEC Project No. 2001013-001 Quantities In Storage 0.125 gal 0.125gal 0.15 gal 0.15 gal 4.125-gal 2.5qal 4,625i:ial -· --.. ------·-----------Modetek Carlsbad, California Process Tool Process Description Dry Box Storage container (#69) 4 Associated Materials Quantities In Use (Open System -liquids) (Closed.system -Gases) August 22, 2001 SEC Project No. 2001013-001 Quantities In Storage Medetek·· 1 Carlsbad, California Process Tool Process Description Associated Materials CHA-E-Beam MTL Deposits metal films Titanium (#1) Nickel CHAE-Beam Deposits dielectric films Nitrogen Dielectric Films (#2) Microscope Optical inspections (#4) Dektak (#5) Techniques Etch Etch's polymer films Hiah Puritv Nitroaen (#10) with 02 Low Purity Nitrogen Ari:ion Carbon Tetrafluoride Sulfur Hexaflouride Oxvi:ien Silane Solvent Hood Clean waters with Acetone (#26) solvents Methanol lsooroovl Alcohol Chemical Hood Etch's wafers with acids Hydrochloric Acid (#27) and bases Sulfuric Acid Ammonium Hvdroxide Hydrofluoric Acid Phosphoric Acid Citric Acid Hvdrogen Bromide Buffered Oxide Etch Hvdroi:1en Peroxide Sodium Hvdroxide Potassium Hydroxide Furn.ace Diffusion furnace for ·Titanium Titanium Oxygen Ovens Bake polymers (#29) Hot Plate Bake polymers (#30) .,,, .., Quantities In Use (Open System -Liquids) (Closed system -Gases) 0.003 lb 0.003 lb 2 cu ft 3 cu ft 3 cu ft 2 cu ft 2 cuft 2 cu ft ·-2 cu ft 0.001 cu ft 0.625 gal 0.325i:1al 0.625 aal 0.25 gal 0.25 i:1al 0.25 aal 0.25 gal 0.251:ial 0.25 i:1al 0.25 gal 0.251:ial 0.25 i:1al 0.25gal 0.251:ial Q.001 lb 1 cu ft August 22, 2001 SEC Project No. 2001013-001 Quantities In Storage 3Ib 3Ib 450 cu ft 765 cu ft 765 cu ft 700 cu ft (Exterior) 700 cu ft (Exterior) 700 cu ft (Exterior) 700 cu ft (Exterior) 2.7 cu ft 4.125 gal 2.5i:1al 4.625i:1al 2 gal 21:ial 2i:1al 2gal 21:ial 2i:1al 2aal 21:ial 2i:1al 2gal 21:ial 1 lb 350 cu ft (Exterior) (Jc,(2.01-[1,<.{ M6detek A 2 Carlsbad, California Process Tool Process Description Associated Materials Spinner Coats polymers Photoresist (#33) Hexamethvldisilaze Polimide Nickel Potassium Ferricvanide Spinner Coats polymers Photo resist (#34) Hexamethvldisilaze Polimide Nickel Potassium Ferricvanide Microscope Optical inspections (#38) Mask Aligner Optical inspections (#40) Mask Aligner Optical i_nspections (#41) Chemical Hood Lapping Station Angstrombond 9001-MT Hardener (#42) a) Aliphatic Amine Mixtiue b) .Diethylenetriamine Angstrombond 9001-MT Resin a) Epoxy Resin Blend -Proprietary b) Modified Silicon Dioxide -Proprietary Angstrombond AB9112 Hardener . a) Aliphatic Amine Mixture b) Deithylenetriamine Angstrombond AB9112 Resin a) Epoxv Resin Blend -Proprietary EPO Tek 353ND, Part A a) Bisphenol F EPO Tek 353ND, Part B a) lmidazole b) Acrylonitrile EPO Tek H2OE, Part A . a) Silver Flake 60% EPO Tek H2OE, F>art B a) Silver Flake 80% ...,, .. Quantities In Use (Open System -Liquids) (Closed svstem -Gases) 0.07 i:ial 0.1 i:ial 0.25 aal 0.0005 lb 0.125 i:ial 0.07 aal 0.1 gal 0.25i:ial 0.0005 lb 0.125 aal " 0.0005 gal 0.0005 gal 0.0005gal 0.0005 gal 0.0005 gal 0:0005 gal 0.0005-gal 0.0005 gal August 22, 2001 SEC Project No. 2001013-001 Quantities In Storage 0.75 gal 0.25i:ial 0 aal 0.5 lb 0.5i:ial 0.75 aal 0.25 aal 0 i:ial 0.5 lb 0.5aal 0.125 gal 0.125 gal 0.125 gal 0.125gal 0.125 gal 0.125_gal 0.125 gal 0.125 gal Modetek Carlsbad, California Process Tool Chemical Hood (#42) (Continued) Chemical Hood (#43) Solvent Bench (#44) Wire Bonder (#47) Work Bench (#49) Oven (#50) Work Bench (#54\ Oven (#55) Wire Bonder (#56) Ovens (#57) Wire Bonder (#58) Wire Bonder (#59) Microscope (#62) Solder Station (#63) Oven (#64) Diciog .saw (#66) Dicing s.aw (#68) ~· Process Description Lapping Station (Continued) Lapping Station Cleans wafers with solvents Bonds wire Cures epoxy glue Cures epoxy glue Bonds wire Cures epoxy glue Bonds wire Bonds wire Optical inspections Solders wire Cures epoxy glue Cuts wafer Cuts wafer 3 Associated Materials EPO Tek 302-1, Part A a) Diolvcidvl Ether of Bisphenol A EPO Tek 302-1, Part B a) No hazardous inoredients Norland 81 a) Mercapto Ester -Trade Secret Norlane 61 a) Mercapto Ester -Trade Secret Acetone Methanol lsooroovl Alcohol Quantities In Use (Open System -Liquids) (Closed system -Gases) 0.0005 gal 0.0005 gal 0.002 gal 0.002 gal 0.625 oal 0.325aal 0.625aal August 22, 2001 SEC Project No. 2001013-001 Quantities In Storage 0.125 gal 0.125gal 0.15 gal 0.15 gal 4.125 qal 2.5aal 4.625 aal Modetek Carlsbad, California Process Tool Process Description Dry Box Storage container (#69) ,,, 4 Associated Materials Quantities In Use (Open System -Liquids) (Closed system -Gases) August 22, 2001 SEC Project No. 2001013-001 Quantities In Storage ., ,; 1 ) . ,, PATRICK KELLEY PRINCIPAL BUILDING INSPECTOR 1635 FARADAY AV CARLSBAD CA 92008 PHONE (760) 602-2716 FAX (760) 602-8560 pkell@ci.carlsbad.ca.us City of Carlsbad Building Department Fax To: Jeff Fenner -Weather Engineering From: Pat Kelley Fax: 619-541 1885 Pages: 1 Phone: 619-921-0475 Date: September 20, 2001 Re: Plan Check Revisions CC: D Urgent X For Review D Please Comme~t D. Please Reply D Please Recycle • Comments: The FAX received on 9-19-01 to evidently request changing clearances to combustibles has insufficient information to analyze. As requested, there should be references to all applicable code sections which would allow this reduction of clearances. Note however that materials which allow reduced clearances should be applied to the combu~tible materials from which clearance is required. (UMC Table 3-B) Revisions to the approved plans (presumably building permit number CB004807 or CB004113 or PCR01124) should be applied for at the building department counter. SEP-19•2OO1 12:27PM T-154 P.OO1/002 F-182 __ ,_ Mechanic;:a! Contracting • HVAC • Plumbing • Service Date: 9 ~ 12-Q{ Number of pages including cover $he<:&: • Z To: From: ?Kr: )CeU/:t ,)Eff ft&JtiJ.eB cell I 612 -92.1-0"f 75 Pboac; __________ _ Subjat:t: Fu: CC: Phone; Fu: }(\'TH-tf6.D IS 111f::: Der-1\tL \ WOVl-P \...\IC~ TO· fou.,aw Fo~ Tlib I V.$TJ\UA11QW of THE: :::DLV6NT f::Xt1AU51 D.Jl-"f 0/\J "TH e N'\OPf;:Tet:. ()~c:GT fl\J CA~GAD. PL-f/:6& f¼=~f'OMQ A~ ~OOftJ Po CQNV&AJtt:f,Jf .SO t\1.-¥\ l Mffl Re-Lcf\Se 1\/\'-( Df!~ ~ RE.NV\Vv Of"J !:.et(cC)Jlc- .,.. .... • &L .,.. C> C> ' ...... C> C> 0.. ""'" an i i &L ~ ...... ....., .,.,. C> C> "· .,.. I Cllo .. ., p ->--• I.> .., 0.. w ' ,U) ~ +., ~-- !&• MINIMUM ~)Q(-01H) 3" MINIMUM IWli' , CLEAFcANCE r~, INSULATION 22' GA SI-IEEf &TEEL WITM t• MINERAL FIBER Xl-'AU&T -S.hc..._, d~ (Pvc~w) FLAMMABLE DUCT ROOF PENETF<ATION NO-T TOSCA"-E _J () 0 _, ¢J c0 1+ -- I___.) &.IOS!Jllli'.Mech Delllt~~ RoofSkuc!llre,ctv.g. Oltl8/2001 12:,:S'38M, mdr.lper PCR01124 2075 LAS PALMAS DR CBAD MO0ETEK -REVISE MECH PLAN PCR ?I~-Lot#: LUND VANDRUFF . 1fi1 . I . ·( (. -~ {)'--/i. . . > . . . U · t~7, 0 C[J(i)L{<J6 7 ; . . r;dr ~v @ f d( ,dv~ . ~po/01 ~ C l!V\ - 7/ 1/0 I t:-5K llfv] · 15-lr6 I C5r a~ 4~,-ll;J h,J k( Gvt1 ~--6 ff £ Byv/ Co/ ff ~ ~ . . .Ii <!!! .. ~ ,~j[ i h~. q ( lf{O( (llt:t-W~,,_,, f lfr,-,_:;, a/:' . s0 Med ~ <:,e , p,r~ co.-{) \_._,,/.e_ 5~ 0--!-f '~ . f (&<-> zv {VL fJM,A 1/Jot =hy \ ~"'~~----:7".:'---,,,......:::-::-~•-•ug .., ,;t .,. '-C>f,'t7'f;! ti~ CB004807 2075 LAS PALMAS DR CBAD .·'-'·.-,~1~-. MODETEK-17,368 SF OFFICE TO OFFICE/MANUFACTURING Tl INDUST Lot#: LUND VANDRUFF ( A{J-0/00 -7CJ C w( / ZJ'b/t-'Rf-;/l;f £. J-5-6/ ~(SQ., pc~ I -10-.,,o/ P1r'e,; CL~ J-q ~ D I f;s 9 .. J Cj_, lv'-- 1 -? ~-o( F -2>'-j Z}_, C. l-VV] ~ p\_V""\... ~ 'Z ( (1{ C, \ C\.,"fLJ}- ~ '-<'-~ ,..~ ~ -(:._(2_..<" o..M!'-IL ~ e:;, .rcr . ?_{tl{(ol~ Z -?,,L-C>( '!-_ll _, w/ r;;-<--,4/lJ/tJU,-,/ l°/4hJ €7 NS' ~ TO FROM BUILDING PLANNING ENGINEERING FIRE APPR/FORM HEALTH DEPT HAZ MAT I AIR QUAL OTHER SEWER DISTR BLDG GRADING LETTER APPLICANT APPLICANT "'13: 6 I ·I PLAN CORR ----+-----ENG CORR I SCHOOL FORM CFO FORM i-S~Q I P E & M WORKSHEET __ ....__.._ _____ BLDG FEES COMPLETE 1, (1,-t~i-;--I rC C. .Lfr7 A19~ cfuli a,_;6 ay.r!_-6 JL·c:111J (£LJ 4 --6~ J/1161, rk/;L/<'/, <s\1-\6( ~ . 3/«M?-~~ c/d/7 ~O&d)_____ f'-/ \'ll~ln '\'~6~:.,_el~"t~~ D~..\:_01)~. Jf'-1