Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2091 LAS PALMAS DR; ; 87-257; Permit
!' -en z 0 j:: < a: j u w 0 'f .. USE BALt POINT PEN ONLY & PRESS HARD _ . ;-:,·' . . . . i .. CARLSB:AD:_·BUILDING ·DEPARTMENT -· . .. -·---. -----· . . . -1. »-.-·--. ... -.... . ·-, • . '. . . -=0 · ·• ": ·-, , ~-~ .. • .• , ·· :. . . 1 ~ • . · 2075 ·1..., Pali:n1 as Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009-1915 ·(619) 438-1161 . ·u· ~ I hereby ·alflrm·that I ·am-licensed under · l • ' ,. · Y"''a'\ .. ' ··· · · • ,., · " · · n, .~-prQy\aJo.r,~ o( Chapter' 9 (commencing with l . Jo'B ADORJ:SS ,· L. . ,· . f .J .. AV, ST.RO, . THOMAS BROS NO. . .1 O~E:t)F APPLf"'A~., -BUSINESS LICENSE# VAi:.UATION :PERMiT NUMBER [{)t~t. 1 tr~;~C:!n°:g~~;"~·~/~~e~~! 17:·1~· i "U)1.l · ·: :~~-· r~L,-,."" ft-?· .. . . . ·-·-· U2/J,.:.}i(IY-I.I · -\qt5'SB ·· :~'tt .... (~~·t:> :,--,_-.r/.7-·I· af;.~~U.~~~;~ten?ffect .... -:: ·l L.O'r .Bi/Oct<: JSUBDIVIS!ON .• 1·-t\SSESl:jORPARCELNO: __ ;,. ' . • . _co_NTR_ACTOfl. . _I '·. { . ,. CO~NTRAC:TOR.SPHONf:~ •. '.:{°ON.f; .. ..: ...... ___ tf.~ ,-1/'~--... ,_ .. · :-: · .. :' h~re_~(·Jf!!'."' th~t r_,a[ll -~~~mp_t_JfO[ll. the. Co_ntrac-_ 1 • . ~ . . . . ,I /Y'")/ .... t . ?. l ~ -ob \ • v:> I · · M ,·N. 1G ·\ t,.\ c._ ,1, . '.D .· I ;. ... IQ! s }!cense_--[aw tor the folfow1ng _reaion !Sec. zo31,5 \· . . " · , • . .. ; . , , . , • l, · . . .. '· ·.Buslnessand,ProfessmnsCode· Anyc11y·orcounlywh1ct.re-. OWNERS NAME • , OWNERS PHONE · · E1:::.U. \~t._ q .· q204-··· . qu,r~s~a perm11 lo, con~trucl, a\fer, i!llprove. demplish, or-, -f ·· s· : · . ~ ·a · ~l ~ · · . CONTRACT·DR'S AQDRESS. , , • STATE LICENSE f':!O. BUILDi(JJ__N S FOOTAGE ,•.re~a_ir.a~y-~Jf!J.Cture,prior.to1\slssuancealsor~quires!heap• i . _11""'"'::'C:>.e?J... · •. ~ =-·v-'· . -"2.lf.-. ::ZIO\ . ' . .. ·1· ~ 'pllcantforsuch permit to t11e·a signed statement-that he IS • 'Ve;:;;, _ _,..... 1.1--"' · \'°"""Y. .,.-"'-~ I •:;;,i,G> · , •· · · · , · . 'llcens~d' pors·uanl to'"the'~proY1~9n~:-~f the"Giintractofs· ~ -OWNER'S MAILING ADORES$ .. ·. . . -• -. . .• 41io ~~ ~ sp. '1-Z.0\·. '343~-~'2,.. . ' .. _.. ' : . -. . ~ License Law·(Chapter 9 commencing-with Secllon 7000 of j ' · · . · · ., -.· ~ f· Q\vJ~ion,3:of)h.eBus1ne.ss.and'Professiors•Code)ort~~_tisex· , • . . ·. . . . .. • ,· , , , . . · ; . . . · . DESIGNER . . .,..-DESIGNE.R S PHONE empttherefro'!'andthebasis.tor•fh~~llegeo~xempl10~. Any,~· ~n·. ·t,.a ...... ~ ... u,t::> =.t,--'D. r· .. x -,t,;,,,.~ r k~·g>.n«. .• .... s.;-:~~~ 'l 1 ~-. · ' . NI\.. v101a11on ol Secf1.on,7031.5 by·an '!J'Phcantfora permit.sub· \ · . ~. · , , · '" · • -· T/ , ~ jeclslfieappl1cantloai:1viLperia!lyofnotmore\hani1~e.l\un-.J' •• PARtPTIONQF WO'RlC-' • ' . , .. dred,dollars:($5~0).-·--.......... ,. . -;· I I t~n~'T16\A1 ·BctU.l l""\1....l"t·. -e'· , .. --:-• .. ,, . OESIGN6R'SAOD'{'l,ESS .... . STATE!,JCENSl:'NO. •. IU,e,s9.Y/n~r.Jlf;t~~P!.OP.erJy.1Qr.mye_mpl9ye~~w11hy,9g~s. I.~-. . . . ,J. ·. . . , , /1!:t:..<::Jlr-::.. r;::,,W~ r-:::., -...... &, '"') f\.lb.-ffi· ;: . as t_h_e11-.Jil)le c~meensa\io~; w111,_do:the ~ork. and tne s_truc• '. o·· \ A-rl , I c,--r--I -.r-,. : t,. <,-;-J"?} t L. .;,,,,t:: 1.L:s:::-I .J ip-.;., I~ r"--=--~ V"'v ~ • -,z.1 CA I "l~ .• o ,_ t~re IS not mfende~·or off~red fqr ~~!e fSec .. 7044, Busm~ss t _ f!V· .l':?'·.1 .t-V · \. . . ~ .a I, '4-F"' ..... .,..J . . . . , . , . . .. ~ ~···-~ ,. _,. "---· APPLICANT to FILL IN·INFQR.MATION WIT!"!IN·SH~D~D ARE~ AND D_ECLARATIONS APPLICATION & .. PERMIT _5!1' u:::' -~ ~ 0 a: -E (I) 1-, I: JJ • · ~nd Professions Code: The,contractor's·t1cense"Lawijoes 1-. F/P · FLR .ELEV.·: · ·NO _-=$-~P · ED!J I -3! ,.not apply t9 ari owner Of. pfbp'erty 'who' builds-or 1jrT1prrives , s; • • _ 1 ~ ST IES --!!', :1nereon.and.whq.dqes·suchwci\k.h1mselLoi-.lh'rbughclu~own ... l. ,• I.,..__ nr-.,,,.. ,,,i • ~f:"t . .,.__ i.......1 I .. o· o·: · ·, .. · r,-.. · _.,··--:;ii"_·/ 6f a:: . ~mployees.-prov1_~~d that ~uch 1mpr?v~~e~ts ar~'"?·' 1nt~nd>:: •· ~ .. _ _ ~ ~-,.__, , ~, ":C..-"'-f, , _ , . . . Y ~, ~ , : , _ ·, _ _ ""--f ;;1_ ;o 'o' ·0· Z menr1ssol~w1\hmone,y~ac:ofcomplefion,1heowner,bu1lder -· · ''-' A.REA . .. , -C · T ... . · ' --· ... · · ---t · -· · -... _."' · w_. edor,01tired.fOrJale.lf,howev!r,_.the_b~ildi~gorimproye_,1------···»~--.,.· . .,eEN'SUSTRAGT •-'PAR,ldrNGSPA'G:E RJS'UNITS I GRADINGPERMITISSUED !REDEVELOPMENT:' ,·m E-OCCLOAO F,IRESPR ., ' ~ WIii have the burden bf,prov,ng ,!hat•he·.ard not biuld of IITI· I . . ' . .. . I . . . . . . . . n ' I ' ~ . . . ' . . . 0 prove-for tl]e.purpose.of sale). . • . . •.• -, • . ... • .... -· -• --• . -' • . . y EJ N D vO Nl'lJ i ' vb N[X ,.,,.,._..f'oJ xaM~n~-1lfichw.1.J.e.r'!.f1ed . ...,,. " . , . _, 1_1 (:_a?_o~n~~O!i~e_propertyi_~rnex,clu~iy~ly,cgntra_ctmg_ \. _ -,-__ ----~-~-_ _ _ __ ,_~ · __ _ .. , .. ~--_ , :· _ . -· • ·. ·,_ ~ -' --i ~ c>d, ~ ·. -· ·· ·• ., .... ·. · -w,-w·---"-~,.,, ""_: .. -: .... ~.-: ... '""~~;.·:-.,,..:!~:;' ;.,,. -f·:@·r .w,t~·hc.~~~ed.con\ra~tors,-tocop~truc1-tqep;o1e_ct(Sec._1044, l .QTY PLUMBIN"' PERMIT -1ss· u·E . . 7~-QTY MECHANICAL PERMIT -ISSUE / r~ SUMMARY/ACCOUNT NUMBER -,g . ., B~smess,and P.!ofessmns Cod~: The·-Gontractor's L1~ense · -:i -,u_, --· 1 •. ·· , ' . ~ /~ . , ·: , . •: ~ ............ ~ _ __ . ---a. ·;~~~~:~t;r~~~;J~~J0J~o0ro~n~\~~!~'.ff{~1c~~iil~~~r;i\th~i'-·1,,:_' .,_ .. E~CH FIX;U~E-TRAP • ·.# •• •• .. • . INS·TAU FURN.'OUCTS UP T0-100 000 BTU .. -.. • . .. tlUILUlN\j t'tt11vt11 ·--·uuHi1u-~0:00,8aO 1-'.Jl'y_\ .. -~: :_ ,. _:~-r~wra~t~r{s)· ll~e'!_se ~ur~u~nt htthe~Contracto(s L1cens~-· . ·. -1 6 •• • . . ---. • , -• -•., -.,:_l_· . , :,; ·1 EACH BUILDING S.E'{'IER • • ... £..,"\ri · · .. .. · OVER 100-;000 BTU. ,. · · .. [J Asa.homeow~erl.amimprovingmy.home,andthe-follow·, -1. ... · AC~., ·'fE · HEATE.'R ANO OR. VENT, BOILER/C"MPR. ES. so· R UP TO 3 HP. J mgcqnd1t1ons~x1st:. 1 ,·. ,-, • 1 .. t; 1 ~-~,E Ft,WA-~~-R. ,. . ,,. . _ . ,, , 1.:.1 _ '. ·~ ' . 1. -The.work is.being performed.prior to sale. . • .. 1 · , · .... . · · · .. ., · ..... .. --· I ·.2. • 1-_have·hved. ln· my .horn~' tor J,yelve ·mon1hs· ·t EACH GAS SYS·T,EM J ·r·Q'·4 ·o tJTL·ETS " . BOl lE.t:l./CQMPR.ES$0 R 3, 1 ~ HP . pnor to comple11on of this work.·. , . . , 3. ,1. have .not.claimed this exemption. ~uring, the, -'.'· · . EA'CH GAS SYSTE-M ·5 0 R MO.R·E • . A METAL FIREPLACE , _ · lastthree years. I · · · · · · · · o lamexem tundersec -~-~-.a·&PC. j ~ACl:UNSTAL., ALT.ER, REPAIR WAT.ER.PIP.E. . -, · VENT FAN SIN.GU DUCT . ..J 5{ l ,tor.lhis rea~oi . . , • , -,f-· / EACH VACUUr,1 BREAKER '2. ~ t:J 1 . MECH EXHAUSJ HOOOIDUCJS · · . . . .... ~OijlLE.HOME OQH ---· "'I· . r . WA;ER SOFTNER . · ' . . . . REkOCATION OFEA FURNACE/HEATER_ _ . -· • -· ... SOLAR ". alliv .fit ~.:" •o ·Ill -m-.. 2~c.•:VSot r; t. , . _ . . 1. E.11,CH ·ROOF DRAIN (I_NSIDEI • DRYER VEN.T . . , : Sl'RONG MOTION=• ~etl'f l)W... ._, ,ii-92-33 0_1!1er_ebyaffirm_that1-~ave·a-cerlif!?•teolcons_ent-to I .. · .. .. ... -... .,,. .. TOTt;LMECHANICAL , · ·. . · ri'D · FIRE" 1., ··-Qll,1,-810-00-00-8227 -· ''Self·in.sure.ora~e.rt~f!cate.ofWorl<ers" Compensa~10.~ In-fi • · . -'VLJ : , -J"""'J ~t.. . -· ...... _ ·• sur~nc~,orac~rt'.hed~opylhereof(Sec.3S'.'°:Labor.Codel F · ,. ·. · _TOT ,ll;L PtUMB1NG · · I /0 .r--. . -~. . ...... ./ ~--,,. . /~!3LIC_FACILl,Tl~S Fifi J 329·.810-Q0-00·874_0 _/,-., /'7"7!/ ~ -POLIGY• NO .• t:::'i\ Lt-::::-I . ' . .. 7't"Y.:1 .~ z ·. ·;. · ': ... · f-· · c::z . --. ; . · O . . ~ P-""''--'<...:.'T' BRIDGE.FEE 360-810·00·00·8740 <-r/ /-~- Q ~-'.'1,~~:~v . . . . J QTY-: ELECTRICAL PERMIT. ISSU~ . . ._5 ~ QTY. M9BJ#ftbME SETUP~~~'\ . • ·p RK-IN:uEU· 'AREA _ • ~ .:._ . ., · : . ... • •... !.c· .... -Copy .. ,s hied with the city. -·. f •. ,. .--. t . /. t. . 1\ .. ,. I}... ·. •. ( · •. · .,. _,) .. , ' , ·. . .. • · ,• .. · , !'1 0 c.ertifi~d':opy-,s~e;~~y-furr,lslied, ·1 JJE\>\ICQ~STEA_AM~'SWT ~KR Lf.:,f}t) 'J()t} -CARP()_RT /t'i/ 4.~ \:.;-'... TIF-,_ _ 312-810-00-00·8835 ,.. .,._ i /,,,~ -~:. t } 1 PH 3 PH' ' . , AWNING tN 111-r. 1001 · \-' . · : . LA c9sTA,'r1i= •• . 311-8io-oo-oo-a8il5 • •· , ~-.gERrtFICATE-OFEXEM~IONFROM i EXISTBLOGEAAMPiSWT'BKR ·-~ ......... GARAGE /?~-, .,,;,k-v, i,:-;. . . FMFr·'~... . . ' .. r-r-ll"l-~-" CJ WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE • n:m ,. ' .' . . ..,.v ,,,. " .. . . ... .... , . ·/ -, . . . I !'I--: (This_ s<1ction need nol be completed if ihe permit · l· 1 PH . 3 PH . · . • \'i:~: (fffit'nW,.l:f:l.SURER , i.,1 i • · • LICENSE TAX ' ' 001·810·00-00-8162 I a: •~ for,one hundred dollars 1$100\ or less\ f ~ , . _ , ,--, ,,. v:1nt. "lJ f\ l' . . '-~·-CARLSl1ti1f';.~·qi., .}; . MFF-1.,,,, l{ y::_ I~ o/0 ... -·-·- ~··· .· ...Jt. -~·4j 880·5'19-92-57 ll/,,. I I -.. ,, ' -th1S .. Perri11t IS ,s~ued. I sh~II ~ot em_p~oy any person in an_y f I . . ·. '"-'p· . ' .. _ ~ . ' . O_ ."1•.nn~rsoast?'6ecomesub1ecttotheWorkers'Compen-.. TEM_ .PQJ.-E 200AM_PS __ , _·_ 11, _, __ -.. •• _. _____ ·-___ ·--__"_/ _•· _ _:::__-. 11.. ______ .:_'_ _____ _ 3 ·-"·'-··"·'-'· ' I I . . ..... .. . .... . f II l ~.o,, .• o'•/ 1 lf . . . I j '-... -.,t, :,:,,, -, "t, ',"./ . . --.::.:::t, ,.. C 1/ . . •. . ,. .. . . - , ,..,,. : . : . ,, CREDIT DEPOSIT • .: ;~: Ut~·--'> --.-··· -L~~ ~ -"'· C, a: 0 "'· (/J ~-(/)' ~ I: :s:: .Q -ai >- (I)·' {) Ci t1l, c, u: ~ -~ C Q) ~ •:_ 0· 0 t, (I), Cl: (/J C ..... ----······-: ~--. - 1 --'Jt>.:S.:--l7~' TO'f~l--:I TOTALFEESPAYABLE l ... --:2-7,J-g{), '41- 1 I HAVE CAREFULLY EXAMINED THE COMPLETED "APPLICATION AND PERMIT" ANO 00 HEREBY ExpiratiON, Effry per_mi~ ls~dbythe Building.Ofliculf unde(lbeprovi~ionsollhis * AN OSHA PE~IT IS AEOUIAED FOf! EXCAVATtoNS OVER I' . . . , [~ , q 1 hereby aJflrm thaf there js a construction lend mg ffi , --agency-{or the perf?rmance of the work·forwhich th1s·per· O ·: (llit 1s is~s4.ed (~ec.'"3097. Civil Code) i CERTIFY UNDER PENAL TY OF PERJURY THAT ALL. INFORMATION HEREON INCLUDING THE Code shall expire by hm.'t~bon •nd become null and void If th8 burfdm!! or work !>' O" DEEP ANO DEMOLITION OR CONSTRUCTION OF ' . authorized by such perm1t·1s-not commenced within 180days from the date of such , · · , <ll: l DECLARATIONS A~E TRUE ANO CORRECT ANDI FURTHER CERTIFY AND AGREE IF A PERMIT 15 permit, or if the budding or work authorized by s permit 15 suspended or STRUCTVMS OVER 3 STORIES IN HEIGHT =:, t· : ISSUED: TO COMPLY WIT,J-i ALL CITY. COUNlY AND.STATE LAWS. GOVERNtN.G BUILDING CON· · abandon tan time after the work 1s co ence or a enod of 180 da s. • .c, STRUCTION. WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE INDEMNIFY AND S O 3:: 1 KEEP l:!ARMLESS 'F.HE CITY Oi= CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES. JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND AP LI N I RE OWNER CONTRACTO 7~ A , I EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE :,,..-.,,,;v,--, / '/) v GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. • · 77'4'\~~-... --~-...... -I . 11'7 i z . ~·· . < • ·-···-w Lender's Name w • : • ~ ~ ~ . ' r --Lender's"'"A'ddfesS • ~ • -_, --~ • ! Ii i f • i :. j,· TYPE BUil.DiNG FOUNl)AJION REINFORCED STEEL ' A • J 1 J. ! r 1 ''l _J DAT~ INSPECTOR ,, J1?~1' ,7 ~ ~.--, 1/:r" 11 ,,. FIELD INSPECTION RECORD ·, ·,· "'c -~-'-., REQUIRED ~PECIAL INSPECTIONS _,_._-~\ ... \. . ,'.\ ,,.,--~=- · 8-7-~7 ·, t·__,: ' . r -i~ !N$f?ECTOR'S NOTES '.__._._ \ MASONRY . . ,· -.. REQ. IF INSPECTOR'S GUNITE OR GROUT i INSPE~l'ION . C CHECKED APl?ROVAL .. _DATE , SUB FRAME D FJ(OOR, . D CEl'*'ING . I r SOILS COMPLIANCE -/.,vn LeJ'~ -~-----.., .-... ; rl · •LIi R ·.1, ri· ~ 1n · ~ PR10R To · SHEATHING IYI ROOF . p S~EA IJ/.r~ -v.:, -:".' -. FouNDAT10N iNsP • -· ll-n.: <:>!:.,,C-P~ FRAME 1 11.1·~ . . . ,.. •• 0 , • • •• • ~ po,-STRUCTURAL CONCRETE . . ~ EXTERIOR LATH ; l'7 OVER 2000 PSI . . -. JNSULAT.ION I • . PRESTRESSED _ . • 1 • • . • CONCRETE · -. . . " 1NTERJORLATH &, oaywALL i . _ . . Pos.T TENSIONED -.-. r.J· ?2-,.cRY'.,. A ~ ~: 1 . /?. zz,. CONCRETE , • . v .0:7 .. ~ ~-. . . ·-.... Pl.UM BING , ·: .. . ' . ':-, ; .. ' FIELD vVELOING --. . ,,-/P'M"' --LA~ ~- D SEWER AND BUCO [J Pl-/C.o . HIGH:sn\ENGJ'H . . .,. -, · , , ·--.. · · · · ' · BOLTS ' ' .. · , · .. UNDERGROUND' -o-WASTE o!WATER· · . . .. ·,t>· ... . -··, •. ·,~·. < ,. ::~ .· :\··- . · . · · SPECIAL MP(SONRY ·-,·. ,· "'• ~ TOP OUT .. D WASTE D \YATER .. . . ·· ' _ . 1·: •. t,:/(.'.~·t, 1 r,,, i, .. : .. _ • ' • ~ --!;.-~•.;,-, :.;·~f.(;,; 11"•·ct--• TUB AND SHOWER PAN ! -' F,-r~:/i . ··,~-..; .;Mr• :t-:·:..~·~ : • i ~ ,. -• SC ·: ' ;1: ~-.. · t. . ... V • • < ~ • ..... ,. .; GAS TEST ' . . . '. ' PILES CAISSONS • • . . . I: ' g'_~·;A-;t:-q WATER HEATER D 501,.AR ~TEA . .... . . . • ! : I, ,. ,. .... ,' / ..,., _;_}_ ___ .. _. __ ,_,. r·, , . ·,- _;. r, ELECTRICAL ' ; · -~···'---. ' D ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND --~FFER_ I J-t'a~~ ROUGH ELECTRIC ! . I I/ .... t _..,; i~.} ±-~'"'. .. ~-i ·,. #,. ;f T!J_; ,-..., '\" --·1 D ELECTRIC ~E_RVl'CE .. o·-T~MPQRARY \ .... _., ,.._.,. -- D BONDIN_G . tl POOL l -i,· J MECHANICAL {' o DUCT & PLEM., o REF. PIP·i-NG : I -. H -1 HEAT ...:.. AIR COND. SYSTEMS f _ _ -r .. !'} 1 __ 1 1. I,, 'ii: ,,, ... -! '-_.,,.., -~ . ' ··, VENTILATING SYSTEMS ! ; ! , .... ....... , ... I I. . 1 -I t I ,::-· ~--:: !~, .. ..,_:_ -,·---.... t -: .,,.-.. t,-.--~-~-~-~~-. -,,-, -,.~~---------------------'--- • • . . ~-•. · .''",·:I'-• -l . !t •·1 ·' i • • \ 1-, . , • ,, :· •. 1 I,., I• • CALL FOR FINAL I_NSPECf:JON.-WHEN.ALL. APPROf'RiATE. . . ITEMS ABO VE HA VE BEEN APFIROVEFJ:'! ·': :. · ·,' ~ ~----'. ---_jf '-f'.,;:. ... FINA~ ! ..... ., PLUMBING ELECTRICAL MECHANfCAL GAS BUILDING .. T f f ! l t 1 J .J. : 4_-:-. t--\. __ ..t , · LL V\ . . I ~·-. ·-· .<:-·i)· •. i J .. -1 ,i '--~,,.. 'I ' /'-1 i . . Ii . 1· ·. ·-. ' .... " ,/ ,_, "-I ' 1,,/ , , ' , . ' ' ,· • , .. ,_. i , ' ,. , ,. , '• " , ' -- , . ~ . ( • , · ( I -_ _,. ~ -f • C ..... ,~;, ' •. ~~-;. ~-~.; r, .,.,,,~ ·l -.; , SPECIAL CONOllJONS , I • -1 \_ .. 7· ... I .. • 1 --l .. ,j ' DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING-SERVICES DIVISION 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE CARLSBAD; CA 92009-4859 (619): 438-1161 . MISCELLANEOUS FEE-RECEl,PT Applicant Please Print And Fill In Shaded Area Only ASSESSOR'S :PARCEL NO. 2, 5-~-/ : OWNER'S 'MAILING . ADDRESS BtZ:J c1TY ~OAU!:,,. z1p 11zo3 -.rEL. BIB-·z"'17- PLAN. lb NO- Bl VAl,.IDATION AREA· ;-coN'.Tf.lACTOR IZ, Br . , -::-:----------------------------l ESTMATED VAb:UATION -_. :z.X fl/~~tl 6 7(; 1 CONTRACTOR'S . , _... MAILING ?{' /t:rv . ADD.RESS PLAN CHECK F~E ~0®tm?Wi~hto.. 1\1:". • _ DE? ~ ---------------------------------..J IF THE APPLICANT TAKES NO ACTION* v:,1'ft!IC~3"6-00 - • CITY STATE 1:JCENSE NO. ZIP BUSINESS LICENSE NO. TEL. I' I W!T-HIN 1!30 DAYS, Pl:.AN CHECK.FEES WILL BE FORFEITED. '. SUBDiVl$10N .... --_____ LOT(S)--""""---------+-----;-,-------,--.c.--,a..--'-----'-----__:_---'-_____ .....:.... i-----------:-------------_:_-----t-,---,-a-----'--_;__--'--'--'--------'--------'-- 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION GT ¢HECK IF. SUBMITTED: 't:J0'11 -ENERGY CALCS 1987 ENERGY CALCS (! ,:;.::f:;.~11; ·- FOR NON RE_SIDENTIAL BLPGS . t}/ DATE GIVEN/ - SENT TO APPLICANT DATE . ' LA COSTA LETTER SCHOOL FEE FORM ZIP OJZ.IZ.O , P & E CORRECTIONS LIST CERTIFICATE ·OF OCCUPANCY. DATE \. White -File Yellow -Applicant Pink -Finance Gold -Assessor CASHIER'S VALIDATION C!Utu nf C!tarlsbab SEWE.R PERM.IT APPLICATION . " '}\JV,:, },:;·· :,·; !'..1'!l. }.f'..:}1· .. r,'ift: }_r. J !ll' .' l APPLICANT TO. FILL IN SHADED AREA SEWER PERMIT NUMBER: SE ---~ l (:·' 1 BUILDING PLAN CHECK NUMBER: PC 17. . ...-' ,, ./ •. BUILDING ADDRESS: ~.:.Y"J'.'1 \ LA·· 1 Al h\l'··'·_ t\'Jl -~ BUILDING TYPE: ff',,.\,,(.,. ,. ,·.'I ·' •. A1 :• _..,, 1-··, l ; l NUMBER OF EDU'S: ' . • . , OWNER: <iL ,..:.\,..;. j_.._ l "-i'\h.) .,--, k, L.'•t·' CALCULATIONS: MAILING ADDRESS: <··er N. F£ANU r·· 1 \h-, :· I.,, 1/. , t-i-'',' '1'/t .. j : ' j f . .,,·;.:... ,,. I ,) . . . ~ ., ... ,::-:., l ! ,"-\1·-r-.:1 \::'."' [1 .... 1'. -· ' .("jl _(i, ,c,,!.>f,,,J CONTRACTOR:· i·-,\\:::: ~l \N Y-'.-\\'..\(, iNr MAi~ING ADD~ESS: . /.l:1 tr·, Ct irP.-"'1\.,-"~ ,-c::: .• r \Y:.i ,, . t\ t-~\ C l f".::, ~-. c.: c;,... r,{ i.J \ \ LEGAL DESCRIPTION: \.("if., t'(Z-l':t!Al, tt O~l CONNECTION FEE ,. -. '.t' COST PER UNJT .. x NO. UNITS _,,, j ·/ ·-/ !_J {.} --~ '" ---· - LATERAL CHARGE: ., '" _,. TOTAL CHARGES: ~-·' ., .l . 1.·;~ · Cl-I l l ,.,,,., .---.. A$SESSORS PARCEL NUMBER: -PREPARED BY:. r· "' ,.. -·· ,,_, ~---· ~----(PRINTED NAME) COMMENTS: ~ /,-~~}/) . ~~=---", a:/ ~ ~\ :· . ' DEC 1981 \~') I ("' ~) ! ! ·-PAID ~ ,':.,, em· TREASURER V w .. 1\ CITY OF CARLSBAD ~I~~ CARLSBAD,CA 0 ··~ \,, .... ,. .·, ...'·vJ I ,. . , ,·· "~ ' ~. ,# ·~ ... ~~"_\!.i_:-•/' • ";::,.-:-' ": __ / .... -- WHITE;: DPS GREEN: Finance CANARY: Water PINK: Building GOLD: Applicant ' \ FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION 87-251 PLAN CHECK NUMBER: DATE: ADDRESS: -----------------------~-----"-'-'---~---'. PROJECT NO.: ________ UNIT NUMBER: ________ PHASE NO.: -~~·'----- TYPE OF UNIT: _____________ NUMBER OF UNITS: CONTACT PERSON~·------------,---------------------i·i.: ~"· CONTACT TELEPHONE~·-------·-'------------------------ aU dept INSPECTED BY: _________ _ INSPECTED BY: _________ _ DATE '/tj INSPECTED: ?'rtf: DATE INSPECTED: DATE INSPECTED: APPROVED ¥-DISAPPROVED ~~- APPROVED DISAPPROVED ~-- APPROVED DISAPPROVED __ _ ,'I,\ t--~".t ,{ COMMENTS: ----------------------~--~-~----~;~t>~. , . ·t -----------------------------------------,-,'-,',·it~~'.I h' ----------------------------------------'-' :.i , I . ~ ;,, Rev. 1/86 WHITE: Suspense BLUE: Water District GREEN: Engineering CANARY: Utilities PINK: Planning GOLD:"Fire, , I :"°~ i' ' ·'' ,, :\ ,! PLAN CHECK NUMBER: DATE: PROJECT NAME:------------~-------------------- ADDRESS: -----------~----------------------- PROJECT NO.: ------,-----UNIT NUMBER: ________ PHASE NO.: '" if;dunt,,•i :.ii ".1:hcU TYPE OF UNIT: _____________ NUMBER OF UNITS: :.10rnne !(b1~J CONTACTPERSON~·------~--------~-------~---';........c.'--~-- • ••r," I I •',~ ''{~,f CONTACT TELEPHONE: ________________________ ,-'--, . .a.,-\'----- INSPECTED !?~0 ,BY:----~__,--+_..,. ___ _ DATE INSPECTED: APPROVED Dl$APPROVED INSPECTED DATE BY: __________ _ INSPECTED: APPROVED DISAPPROVED INSPECTED DATE BY: __ · ________ _ INSPECTED: APPROVED DISAPPROVED COMMENTS:-------------------~----~---------- ' I \,J ''1. 't • . , i' ---------------~-------------------------..~\~ * .\~.,it . ,t",tt ~ ~·(,-', ----------~---------'-------------------------'-, {, . ,, Rev. 1/86 WHITE: Suspense BLUE: Water District GREEN: Engineering CANARY-: Utilities PINK: Planning GOLD: Fire ~ , ... " '. ' . '1·"'" .. ,., . .,, ' "' "'~.'"' ., . ,~, ~---~,-.,,,.,l.].Jt!: ,.._., . '" ,, __ ,....,_ ; ""'o/--1:'<'!"''"'" --"-n'/ ' . ._ 1~;.~:;: ,,{ ")~,;~,,~r ~'.J(;,~,_.""~f'~:r~ ,,.~;~~~. s~. ;~ .. ~f.tii~~~1;:tt;:;~' ;~1\J"; , __ :_l~i}_Ji';,.?"i,,.;,;jj.,; ~ '~~ ... ,, ,..,.;~,{'f~; It' .,~'\\\~'l)N';.{!~}ti:~'1~~~~~~·~)1-:?+~~'"•~,/l~~~~~.-,'fi~-~"'-~~;t,~-·~"' ' ' f~ ;i,,...:f;_/t,i;,, >I~ ,..·,"';t,.. "\' ~-..,..,.. :r~. ~rt,•rt1'1lf{ ~1"C"'l,,{T ~-(:t',-,ri· .. ,-· T~r;'\~';,f'(""'"'.,.....-1 ... ..,.,-,t'>f'.j\4.~.... • '.f\4' "¥'' T3ij ~, ... ·. '. · ,~:,t~~~ ""''\ . Fl·N~L BUILDING INSPECTION , . . \' " • PlANCHECK. NUMB~R: DATE: . ' . , PROJECT NAME: ------------'----~--_,,_ ___ ,.,,,,...~:;;:;:::;;,""..-_.,...,--___ _ ADDRESS: PROJECT NO.: ---'-'-----'-UN)T NUM.BER; ·-~------ TYPE-OF UNIT: INSPl::CTED BY:----'------~ INSPECTED BY:------'----'---- INSPECTED BY:....c-~: ________ _ DATE INSPECTED:' ____ _ APPROVED DATE l!'lSPECfED: DATE. INSPECTED: APPROVED -'---~~-. APPROVED __ _ DISAPPROVED __ _ DISAPPROVED ~-- DISAPP.RQVED ---'-,--' _,. '• ===========~-=~============~==========~· > ' ; ;\, COMMEN-Y:S: J~ '. ------~-~------~---~--------------,,,, . . ,);,/ i \ --,-------~--------------~--~--------'---~--~·' 1', ", t'" , If ,, '.,:l - '.~. j;; Rev. 1/86 WHITE: Suspense BLUE: Water District ·GREEN: EngineerinQ CANARY: Utilities PINK: Planning GOLD: 'Fire ·,, > , \ \! ,;~1iv~:~"ir.:.~-~-,i;:,."1~,;4-~\·~·,:t.-fo1~'i,~.f,;J-.j,~~.: ..... ~ • .;....J,,.~.:'&'-~M~~~~i.;,~,J,.;~,,.~,;..,1,1.k"'4·•--.,~.-~,..,._......,,.,, ...,., , ·" · ,,,.. • .. -· · ~· ,-,. •• • :1~'''''n-W-t.."'i -' .. -~ f' J '~;·,.,fat~ FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION , t , ,- 87-257 6-30-88 PLAN CHECK NUMBER: DATE: PROJECTNAME: _________________ -"--~'-------,.--_,...c..---+-~ 2091 Las Palmas Dr. ADDRESS: ---------~-------~-----~--~--'---,.---'--',---+-,,- PROJECT NO.: _______ UNIT NUMBER: -,----,---~~ PHASE NO.: ---".,-'-------,--c industrial shell TYPE OF UNIT: -------~----,-NUMBER OF UNITS: Merline King CONTACTPERSON:. _____________ '-----------'-----~..c......,,,__~ 931-3312 CONTACT TELEPHONE~·---~----~----~~-'--~'-----'----'--~------,.,.'- INSPECTED ·BY: INSPECTED BY: ____ '---'------ INSPECTED BY: _________ _ a11 dept A , \· DATE I ,' • JUL O 8 1988 INSPECTED: ____ _ DATE INSPECTED: DAT!; INSPECTED: .~~--~ Costa Real: Municipal Wa.te; District COMMENTS: Eogmeering Depa, tlOent . (619) 438-3367 ·.::-_ '! ·•' /' ' . I ' ~ \.~ APPROV~D .. ___ DISAPPROVED -'-'--~ APPROVED __ _ DISAPPROVED --'-'---- APPROVED __ _ DISAPPROVED -~- COSTA REAL MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT Rev. 1/86 WHITE: Suspense BLUE: Water District GREEN: Engineering CANARY: Utilities PINK: Planning GOLD: Fire r ·; .... ' ' ' \l ,'' ' '', ;' -' ,i_: ·-•, ' ,,, .• ' ~' ' ' ' ,, ' • ,,.-,. ' ' ~ .. ~-~ , ,f ~,· • '' ' • • ' ,, ' _. ...... , •• -~ ,-' .. '?,1-: ! .. i .. , ,""~-".1'~:;'""":_"t :., ..• 1"-W-~.-;vy fMr-it::,.;;-),;-r,;'{t..J.;;-.:.n" \., ..:~':-~-~-"t''¥'t1',r.~ .. -~lr'.-~'t\ .... •F r./ ' .. .-,~):!.-.:(T->.1'~,.-.("t.\l'y'i-.,\),.: .. /'~;;fr(PlJ-¼·t·~'{,,"iJ.,:~"<';:)1r,, ,•,,' ·,~~~~··n:---t--·-'·""~ .;::-_-nt/<1/1-'--,,.-r~·;-;-:~;' ,/ ;, ~ ~:.-1"~.·~~-... .;('"1.'l,~:r-t --l'~,v~~; ... ~,.,'tf'·~J~!J.te1~~~,i..,;;"""if't~,;t, ;,;r-'11,,, ",j: ' ;.;. v-·· :,, .. , . : .· .; .. ,:;,,,,,,,~.. '8,.f•., .. • ,.., , .•• ,..,...r-~· . . . ,~-~-'"·i~\ FINAL BUI-LDING INSPECTION •· 87-257 PLAN CHECK NUMBER:· DATE: PROJECT NAME:----------~-------~~-'----"-----~-'-'----- 2091 L;1s Palmas Or. ADDRESS: PROJECT NO.: --------'-· UNIT NUMBER: industri·al eheU -------~ PHASE NO.: -~-~~--- TYPE OF UNIT: ---~-------~~ NUMBER OF UNITS: Merline-!(ing CONTACT PERSON~·----~----------------.,-~--~~---'--~-- ·. 931-8312 CONTACT TELEPHONE: _____________ -'-~~'---~-'-'--------.:...-,_.,,.~....:..... ~y~PECTE~ ~ INSPECTED BY:----,--------- INSPECTED ·BY:~------~---- all--dapt- DATE INSPECTED: DATE INSPEQlED: ' ~-··,;<-'"~ DATE .. INSPECT-ED: APPROVED ..):!!._ . DISAPPROVED -'-~- APPROVED DISAPPROVED -'--- APPROVED ----'------'-DISAP,PRPVED -'-',,--'- -,l COMMENTS:------------------------;...,--~'------,--'--,----'---,-,-,-,---~~ Rev, 1/86 WHITE: Suspense BLUE: Water Distr.ict GREEN: Engineering ·CANARY: \Jtilitjes PIN!(: Planning GOl,D:. Fire t, ',\ ._ ' I 'j i I I I l ' I r '~· WESTERN INSPECTION SERVICE RECEIVED MAY 111sae MERLI.N KING, INC. QUALIJY LICENSEE WESTERN INSPECTION SERVICE hereby cerdfiet that I & J Laminators Company at Its plant in Myrtle _Creek, Ore con is licensed b~ .WESTERN INSPECTION SERVICE to use its repstered trademark in respect to products which comply with Standard ANSI/ AITC 190.1-1983, for Structural Clued Laminated Tunben, that the adequacy of the quality control system in effect at 11id plant is periodically inspected and verified by a WESTERN INSPECTION SERVICE INSPECTOR, In ~e judgment of the underslped, wd company is capable of complyins with the manu- facturina and testina pro~ons of Standard ANSI/.,\JTC 190.1-1983 in respect to products manufactured at liid plant, The sole responsibility of .the manufacturer ii confonnanc:e with the Standard ANSI/AITC 190.1•1983 in respect of any specific or particular pl'.Oduct. WESTERN INSPECTION SERVICE's only respondbility bein& that the said company Ii qualffied to produce a product meeting the said Standard and. that its pant is periodically Inspected and verified by WESTERN INSPECTION SERVICE. w.1.s. Certificate •---8-5..,.8..._ __ _ Slped for WESTERN INSPECTION SERVICE THE UNDERSIGNED MANUFACTURER JJEREBY CERTIFiES that the products identified below and on the following sheets are marked with the registered trademark of WESTERN INSPECTION SERVICE and were manufactured in confonnance.with appropriate provisions of Standard ANSI/AITC 190.1-19183, 0for Struc0tural Glued Laminated Timber, and haa been manufactured at our plant in Myrt e . l."eek, regon , which pti.nt has a quality control system approved by the Bureau. The undersiped manufacturer further certifies that the work his been done in accordance with UNIFORM BUILDING CODE CHAPTER 25 and the appropriate Job.specific.ations. JOB NAME .Palomar Airport Bua1m,.eea Park tot # 8 JOB LOCATION 2091 Laa Palma~ Dr1Te Carlsbad, California Customer's Order No. _ _..3 .... 9&ii&,16-----· Date 3/11 /88 Mfr's Order No. --'=0l.;.;;14...._ ___ _ SIGNATURE 1"' M,-·'lh'ht 79 TITLE A~st. l!anngcr )<~ ADDRESS 9160 S, Myrtle Ro,9.•·1 'COMPANY Y r. J ! .. er~inrt,o:cs DATE 3/11 /88 . ~,1 BY:Y&J LAMINATORS ; 5-10-88 9:29AM; 5038633439-, 5038633439-, 7147729590;1'* 1 7147729590;t:! 1 I International Conference of Building Officials EVALUATION REPORT Affng Cn!gory:'OUAUTY CONTROL AGENCIES -QUALm' CONTROL AGENCY FOR WMBI.RAND Gll7ED• LAMINAttl> WMStR ANll INSPEC'tlON AGENCY FOR l'R.EFA.BRICATED TRUSS CONSTRUCTION WESTEIN INSPEC110N SERVICE POST OFFJCE BOX ~62 • COSTA MESA'., CALlFORNIA '2627 I. Subj&d: Qull~ly Control Aec11cy for Ulmbcr and Oh1cd-laml11111d uimber .nd hltpcictjo11 Aft:ncy for Prtfat,ricau,d lnlf, Constrlledoa. · D. Dac:riptloll: Q11aJtty C11ntn,I Se"1cesi 1'be Westen Jnlll*dc,n Service pmides qui.lit:, ~011!7i;,I ~l"Yiee, in ~ec,1dltlce with U.a.e. Sta· duds Nos. 2.1•1, 25•3, 2.S""" and 25-' for lumber ,nidini 1111d U.J.C. SiandardsN~. 25•10 &nd.25· 11 for IIUed•IIU1U,Dll.ed lllnitlcr. Rtpllcu or 1tamps lot labeb affixed 1o bitJ:,Cetcd ptOdlets art almilw lO ~ ,tR;nm in thi1 repon. RITETRUSS CO. CERTIFIED INSPECTION ICBO AA-583 IN STl?ICT ACCORDANCE WITH UBC 25 .. 17 PREFABRICATED IN 51RICT ACCORDANCE WITH U BC 25-3 CERTIFIED STANDARD S-GRN 0-F R IE C E I V E D Report No. AA-s83 MAY 1 i 198~ '4Nlfl#, 198' .. . t!Uft~I~ KIHG, INC, bdptdlo11 Strttm: The Wutl!ffl In~on !mice ~des~. d01i .S ctrtificatiott 1ft IIICCOtdMce with U,B.C, SWldtrd No. 2.S-J1 for preftbricated tn111 coa,tnt~lon and Standard No. 25·3 for lmaina&ed . ittdals, . m. l:¥tde11tt S11bmtaed: Outline of qullity conrrol cd tmpmioa pu::wtiedwu, tq:illea,. of ,tamps and label1, IUmD:111)' of cduc:adim and uperlence ot key ~el 111d copies of lnspecdon Lad c:ertUIQlllion fonN.,.1!a91t 1111nlnad. Finding• IV. rtndma: nit tlse 'Watl:m lmpedio11 SeM'fee bt ~ u • qualtt7 coninil .. d bapeetloll •*f lor tbe 1ernces Ii.id In WI ....... 'l1llt npert a. 111\,Jeet lo l"H:mllblaUo-. hi two yMl'I. QUALITY INSPECTED W-Gl-10 CERTIFIED INSPECTION ICBOAA-583 IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH UBC 25 • 10 25 -11 ICBO nwJIUllio11 Hpem "1't imml ,,,ulJ to 1nwld; uv,,,,,..,,,11 ill Clat1 A MiMrr ,f llr, or,•,rltlltlon utUldl'II tit, cod, ""'"' wlrlelt tl,1 rq,ort Lt lrla1,I, lw,l,,_.11 ,,,,,,v Gtf flOI lo k t•,tllntd _, tyr#I"""' adlM#a Ir fll1 ., ""7'Ullllfl ut lplCf/kal/J Mdn111d ,soru fllt 1nJorn,,.,,11t ~ ,,,.,,,..,,,,.,,,,.,,.,,,,..,,of tit• 111'1),,1 ,.,.,,, ft,h·r•;,t.l.1 m-:i",1111r-..J'l/"1-..ty.w:,•1WA"'yt .. ,.Mt~(,ft"-, ,,., fl,:t/tl'lqffl 111htll•' t, th, OD11lic:1ns., l1rr IC!O l(r:hni&nl fql.ff' ~ rrPina/ t/rr "Fi111lill1" or othtr IMlltr bl tit, r,port or II i, flll1 prrxl11d tOl'friil b1 tltt rt,wt. 'ffrll ,ll,lailrt,r fn,:UMlr,, b111 ii not luniU, to, 1Mrclionw,lll11, ,...,at, ., SPECIAL INSPECTOR'S REPORT EACH INSPECTOR MUST COMPI.r.E TH!S REPORT AND MAIL IT TO nCE DISTRICT OFFICE or THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVlSION-. • i, ' WE!Kl.Y CJ J'INAL ~ TOTAL TIME ON JOB {IN DAYS) / ... BUILDING PERMIT NO $J7-;z57 DISTlUCT NO __ _ JosADnRESS ;zav £~-~ .· -~ Qtl,'ERAL CONTRACTOR ~k /ttiy· ~ ' SIZE or BLDG. /(/4 '({2,5' 11 > TY?E'01W,4,I,I, ~&k?i(;;: NO. 01' STOR ..... IF-.;...S - TYPE OF WORK: JWm'ORo:D CONCR?'I'E O ?iµSONit"i O HI-TENSIU BOL'I'INO CJ · _ _:.... . :PRE.STRESSED CONCll'I'J: tJ . _ ~INO ~ GYPSUM CON~ ·o > JqSCRIPT!ON or WORK INsnCffD > ~ > :: ~~-_· • (!h· _ , f-2 -11 -12-a/56 c/4,./k ~ · -~ ~ (,f71ffl, ~ (YJ7MY/t;~ c:a-nAt --. -. ,\ -~ • .. '? ::;'ft .. tl~ All work on this job to date has bev~c:orily completed and c~nf?rms to the approved plans and i: requirements of the · -, , Building Code. , ts-rs--g,-.r ~,~· 46£::: k: Da~ Sp~cial Inspecto: I D.Nc. ,'£,..,. ,~~. PRlitfl:'D BY MR INSTANT PRINTER-Div Al S RUBBER STAMP & SP\WWORl$S·[2131.,y96·WS WHITTIER. CA ARS-25 ,(it·, ,,. ; },t,~;~,... ·, ' \ ... \:: ,\ .... 4"" .•, ~ ..... l .. s ., . ' SPECIAL INSPECTOR'S REPORT EACH INSPECTOR MUST COMP!r."E TH!S REPORT AND MAIL IT TO THE DISTR!CT omCE or THE -BUll..DING AND SAFETY DIVISION. - WUKLYC] ~~~ TOTAL TIME ON JOB (IN DAYS) / BUILDING PERMIT NO f{r,.,5"7 DISTlUCT NO __ _ JOB ADDRtss :;.09/ A@ I~, -~ Cet GE.NERA,L C6NTRACTOI! IJ'!,ut.,i,, ~ Cw.,:t:: SIZE or BLDG. /~ qr;~S-'f TYPE orw.u,r. ~ No. or sro~ ..... rr .... s __ TYPE OF WORK: JWNi'ORCED CONCRJ:TE Cl MASONRY Cl HI-TENSIU BOLTING 0 PRESTRESSED CONClU:'l'Z O WELDING 1i GYPSUM CONClU::ff 0 DESCRIPTION or WORX INSPJ:CTZD·-..a,a'-!l~=i;::;.:J=-..;,.:~~~--------------- (!2, ,3_-7-1 I -17-7 3 ht-c,/,.,,.(/M4 !_ ~ ~ -~ -~ . » Alf work o·n this job to date has been ~atistactorily completed and conforms to the approved-plans and requirements of the . -V/5C -_ -Building Code. kR ~Ifft ~'1kzi£?{ #t3,? ~ D _ Special Inspecto:-I D Ne. PRINTED BY MR ·INSTANT PRINTER-Dov Al S RUBBER STAMP & SPEC WORKS-(213J 696--1415 WHITTIER. CA ARS-25 . :~: . ·,:.: ·.:·: ... JU~ 19~! RECEl'JEO Bui\d\ng Department ,' . .:·:-: · .. ·.· .·,.,·.·:-,·: . ·:·: ..... .. -.: ... :::·· :· :, .. ...,.r:::. :·:· · .. · · . . . _.; .. · · ... ~ .• .. . . ,., ..... · .. :, .·: :_:·:. ·.· . . · .... :· .. ·.· .. :~· .. ·:-.:.:·, "•:: .. : ·. ·-.:~.: :: . · . . ·, ·. :·:·~ . ·: .: ...... '· .·· ·.· . .... ·.· ... : .:-: .. ·:.:·: . . . '· .. ·· .. .... ··, ·:·: -'. .· ... :- · . .__., . .':-:· ; . ........... . '.·· ' .. '·\. '. ·:· MERLIN KING., INC. General Contractor I Construction Management Received . LETTER OF 4710 Ruffner Street, Suite G, San Diego, California 92111, (619) 56~ G 1988 TRANSMITTAL CITY OF CARLSBAD DEVELOP,, PRO '" S..ERV,. .DIV.. Date: . ~ Z.,"\t B~ Job No: 'bl~51~ Job;_~_-...;;;....._U\-.:·-,--Sl-\~_8_~J~--------,- 2016 LA;S ~ ,GLS'BD,C\Wtf6. , I Gentlemen: hereWit } /) . '?_·1>~-· : r-r.::=, t":.N l_b I lot. 1 c:;:, We are sendin L----Copies L~ L./1 ,I.A.A'f--n vvr--·---4-u:-:-:n:-::i'der separate cover ------'~=---,--,.~-='-'=-'--~-'----'--...c........a---''---'--'---=--'--- AT .Jo\NT l N F \t@::G-W-kVL_ The~e are: 1. D For __ ~ ___ approval. Please return two appr.oved prints for our files. 2. D Revised and for ____________ final approval.. Please return two approved prints for our files. 3.~or your files or use on job. 4. D Correct and re-submit disapproved drawings. 5. D Remar.ks=-----------------'------'----~-,--~~--------- Copy to: .'YvvY--: -~ FORM 10 E&W Very truly yours, .Merlin King, Inc. By:dYV I -- .• ·1 • ,t .. POOR . - . · .QUALITY }.· f-~ -r" ;. ~ . . . · · O'RIGINAL S • f ·-• JUH-29--88 WED 8:20 LOWRY & ASSOC P.02 ,<; ~ ... ,Jj ,,.. :: 7 '. I . ! ' @ 1978, 1reMe .J'UN-29-88 ~ED, 8:20 LOWRY. ASSOC P. e :2 ESGIL C.ORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE i>R., SUITE.208 Si\.:N DIEGO, CA 92123 (6"19) 560-1468 DATE.: S, /9'87 . 0 APPLICANT JURISDICTJ:ON: ~I~ · CHECKER- PLAN CHECK NO: .87-2:f7 QFILE C0PX -OUPS . QDESIGNER_ PROJECT ADDRESS: _____________________ _ PROJECT NAME: D D The plans transmitted -herewith ha~e been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with.the .jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially .comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficien- cies identified --------------are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith h•ve significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check iist and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. 0 The check list transmitt~d herewith is for your. information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corp. until corrected plans are submitted fo·r recheck. 0 The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to return to the applicant contact person. O The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: O Esgil staff did not advise .the applicant contact person that j?lan check has been completed. -~ Esg-il staff did advise applicant .that the plan check has been completed •. Person contacted=-~C...-a-e~M ......... A ........ s _______ _ Date contacted: 8-:-5 -l'3 7 REMARKS: Telephone # h/4-L /< -/,v- -------'-------------------------- By: {}t:..e'.1.J. /J,,a4µ,;f!:I< Enclosures: -----------ESGIL CORPORATION ' \ ESGIL CORPORATION. 9320 CHESAPEAKE OR •• SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO. C..\ 92123 {619) 560· l 468 DATE: July 9 ·14 i7 (]MPLICANT ~-.1UR IS DI CT;:J;;E) N 0 PLAN CHECKER JURISDICTION: CJ:::...RL5'oAO PLAN CHECK NO: B FILE COPY UPS D DESIGNER PROJECT ADDRESS: PROJECT NANE~ D D D 11 D D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and sub~tantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith-will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's bq.ilding codes when minor deficien-cies identified ______________ are resolved and checked by building department staff. . . The. plans transmitted herewith have s·ignificant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should.be corrected and resubmitted for a compl.ete_ recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is fo~ your information. The p:lans are being held at Esgil Corp. until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy·of the c~eck list· is enclosed for the jurisdiction to return to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: R, C.ooM6S SA.t-..) D 1EG.D q Z l 2. 0 ·Esgil staff did not advise the applicant contact person that plan check has been completed. Esgil staff did advise applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: It.It; 1'-1/4<;.saoo · ;r Date conta.cted: 7--/0-8'7 Telephone #_t.,.19 S 94 84-4~ REMARKS: P.eev/OU.S. CoR.Rgcr1D.1US NOT .SATf..5EAcro/2/Lf ; ' ' , ' · £e.:!>OLVED. A8E TJ-IQ.:5e Cl/2CLIEO lrc,t.,f~ tV/.-IJC.l-1 t../&lle · /1/t;>-r Bc:eAI 1AJrr1,&1,.ED': ,& o/J TliE ATTACHED C/.JeEei, t -. . ' 7 . . . . C?'A.l.6e£Vn}OoA.J Co.e,e,EC.,T'IOA) L1~r, /r Yoo ;/AvE tS!_<1c;.;s,Ttt'J.A.J.S .PLEA..se C'oA.J&c:r 6:t.EN A.oA/l-le-JC. &T E.;5c:1LCaeP, TEL. , -- t:.19 5(&,0 1~8. By; 6/./71?Y.!J -kJ t'U@ tl. ·Enclosures: ESGILkORPOf'ATfk . ----------------------- ENERGY CONSERVATION CORRECIIOHS -LOWRlSF. omCE BUILDIHCS On January l, 1987, new stafldards, and a new design manual, ..,,ent into effect to govern the .energy design for new heated or cooled lowrise office buildings, (i.e. 3 stories or less). '.Ole new standards and design also apply to alterations or additions involving heated or cooled space in existing lowrise office bµildings or existing shell or speculative buildings wherein heated or cooled office space is being proposed or lighting is being extended to new conditioned space. '.Ole new standards (214 pages) and the new "Designing for Compliance" manual (400+ pages) conta,in forms and design instructions that are essential to developing a complying design. 'I'o order the standards and manual you can contact the california Energy Commission, Accounting Office, 1516 North Street, MS #2? Sa7ramento, Caiifornia 95814 (Teleph~ne (916) 324-3014) • . . Please address the circled items ·and, when resubmitting, provide a copy of this showing the page, deta~l, etc. where each circled item has been addressed. In new or existing buildings a Certificate of Compliance (Form CF-1) must be completed and imprinted on the . plans if HVAC or lighting · is being extend~d to a new conditioned. space. (l-13 Manual). A .¢ert~ficate of Compliance (CF-1) is required to be imprinted on the Rla:ns for shell or speculative buildings where lighting,. HVAC or other improvements will be made by the tenants. (Manual 1-13) Multiple Certificates of Compliance (CF- l) are required to be µrprinted on the plans for specul~tive pr shell buildings, ~ere the final occupancy is not known at the time of the original building permit. '.Ole multiple CF-1 documents should address the potential uses, i.e. office, retail sales, etc., and ·should apply the appropriate stand.i;-ds to the specific occupancies~ (Manua.1 1-22) · The Certificate of Compliance (CF-1), Page 1, 111Ust be signed in the lower right by the licensed person who is attesting that the design complies with the regulations. (Manual i-14) !he upper le£t corner of the Certificate 0£ Compliance (CF-l), Pages l and 2, J11Ust show the name of the documentation author, who need not be a licensed person. (Manual 1-14) '.the owner of the building 111Ust sign in the appropriate place on .Page 2 of Certificate of Compliance (CF-1). (Ma,nual 1-14) '.Ole design entities (electrical, etc.), must sign in the appropriate space on Page 2 of Certificate of Compliance (CF- 1). (Manual 5-4.) Note ·on the plans, near the imprinted Certificate of Compliance (CF-1), "A se~arate copy of· the Certificate of Compliance (CF-l) bas been retained by the owner and will be made available to futu:i::e owners or future tenants.11 (Manual 5-4) rn:~ ~ Note on the plans., near the imprinted Certificate of Compliance (CF-1), "At the time . of permit issuance, the permittee will provide~ approved copy· of the Certificate of Compliance (CF-1) to the jurisdiction11 , for filing. (UBC Section 302 (~) 7). ,, .-,.-~10 If a Certificate of Compliance (CF-1) was previously prepared fo.r this entire building, or for improvements or alter~tions in this building, provide a copy of the approved Certificate of·· Compliance (CF-1). (Manual 5-4:) _"oB°&.~e bui7d~ng is a mixed use build~i and ~ :n Certificate of Compliance (CF·l) IIIUSt be prepared for each use unless the subordinate occupancies total less than 1.,000 S.F • .!!!Sare less than 10% of.the total conditioned floor area-. . · ;:u 6 I~-C~:,3~ (Manual 1-22) . 0 J .-.,.,. I I · "" JI -' ;::-1l 1~:-1 , ~ ~!:/:1 i•f.Au·a S,C'::: ,::, .-· ·J~ :,.., · ~ On CF-1., Line .1., show the occupancy type., i.e. lowrise office. @:~ On CF-1., Line 2., show the occupancy group B-2. @:.0 On CF-l., Line 3, show the package selected, .i.e. A, B, c, D, E or Performance Approach. ~ On CF-1, Line 4., show tl?.e conditioned floor_ area being addressed by the documentation. ~ CF-1, Line S, show the proposed or '?r~-::isting ti:,tal resistance (~) for the roof. If different types of roof, complete CF-2. Complete a CF-3 if only one roof type. OB-17 On, CF-1, Line 6, show the minimum allowed total resistance.(Rt) for the roof taken fr..om-the package you selected. (o»-Wn C.F-1, Line 7, show the proposed or ~:~isting total resistance (Rt) for exposed floors or soffits separating conditioned space from non-conditioned space, using Form CF-2. Provide a Form CF-3. (Slab-on-grade floors are not ·considered to be floors for this item.) OB-19 On CF-1, Line 8, show the minimum allowed total resistance (Rt) for the floor taken from the package you selected. 8 On CF-1, Line 9, if there are different .... · types of walls, show the proposed or existing average total resistance(~), using CF-2. If only one wall type, only CF-3 need be completed. W4.51 tv,4-c..c. $> Atfti ,u or S t-to'4.J.v e:,/'( ('_,«= z. On CF~l., Line 10, complete CF-2.if all opaque walls and doors have the same h~t capacity, generally a Heat Capacity less than four. If there are multiple walls having different heat capacities~ this may be left blank". 0B-22 On CF-1, Line 11, show the minimum required total resistance (Rt) for opaque walls ·and doors. If multiple walls, having different Heat Capacities are proposed, show the area weighted average using CF-2. ·'9 On CF-1., Line 12, show the total ~ exterior wall area for ·the entire building or that portion covered by the new standards. lhe exterior lo'all area should .include opaque walls, doors and windows between the floor and the bottom of the floor, or roof, above, that separate conditioned space from non- conditioned space. Provide a CF-2. :1!/11!111 S HO c,.J L4J ~ -, l,,cJ ,4 '--'-.S . On CF-1, Line 13, show the total glazing in walls separating conditioned ;-pace from non-conditioned space. Provide a CF-2. I -r· ri ,-. , .. ; ·/''\ ~ ~ ,, ..J /...I , •. -. , ... J .• L. '-/~ , ... ~ /..,_ ·-Tr§ l/1.!:! f-4 .. J!1 , ... !, ) • .1.:::.. •• , ,, ~:! ~ ..... , ,;: :.: .. ~· . ··.~:. ' ~ ,-, I ,.. .. -., -,..,.,-'\o,J 111·.1i~1 ,,. ·,r~~n CF-1, Line 14, show the percent of 7-~· ;~terior wall, between conditioned and · non-conditioned space, that is glazed, i.e. Line 13 divided by Line 12 times 100. ~II'( On CF-1, Line 15, show the average '-7L."';:,I shading coef'.f icient for all glazing, supported by a CF-2. If only one type of glazing, no calculation is necessary just enter the shading coefficient for the glazing. o~-27 On CF-1, Line 16, enter the allowed percent of glazing, for the ~elected package, based on the ave.rage -~hading coefficient shown on Line 15. !his entry should be greater than the Line 14 entry. ··o:s-28 On CF-1, Lines 17 through 21 should be OB-29 left blauk for lowrlse office buildings. On CF-l, Lines 22. through 29, enter the proposed area of skylights and the allowed · area per the package selected. If more than a skylights attach a separate sheet. .·i ~ :''"··~ .. ,..__ .. , ~ ... ·, ,..,. . ,. , ..: .. · . . . ~ .,/. .... .. '· ... '· ·,. ..... ' -~ ... , . -~··; . . // ';.:. -~ ,,_. . ·i • .-I • ' __ .. .-... 1 1·,J ". ~ I .... :,, .. ';• • : ....... f '/ • 'J ·• •, \ .....,,,_..;..;._;,f~~....:..------.....:.:...;.;....;..__...:·:.::··~· -...:......:.:• ... , ,, .. ,) •• -•,·J. Gd~-~ :,c§_ (i. ':• ~--' / .'>~,';.•I/-~-~·.'-' I ,. j/ ... _.?,i '·•,/ :.~ ,·\ ·;;-· ,,,,~-',·","'',,.•. !· .• ,· ..... :-~"' ',;1::·,,, .• ___ _..._...;.. ___________ _,;.;...... ___ ,_, __ .;.·_ ·-- ~ ....... .-.. J ••• .•• I . I"' . _;.: I . I·!·-;' .... l ·1 _._, . :. •• :,,•' ! J' ! .; .. ,···, I //.: . ·' ,.,.:,,&-, . ,.. .. . ;... , i-' . ;_,-:-·./ C!~ S ,.--~-,,-~·/··. , .... ~.., ) ,=-, ·-·-... _ ._·; __ I. •"'t ,. -.. -.. -,· ... (!,,.. .. , -1'~·· •. -~~ .,}1 • ..-c,r_~---: ,,,.. ... ,.,.,.,/.··"'·• .. •....:: .•. ,,:..,,·_--r_i ..,t'J {.l~c ,,. ·.; /l.../-•.11 ., , •• • rt --,...._. , '/ _>-I Ci 1. I-~ t.l'!" •,1..) "; /,0 ltuP'!--r t"-.J 1He A.tJ1-1-z:. PnocA'AM. Oo<Ss r.\ . ., /···~·,. I'-~ •• ~ .... , ... . ~~· J ,._, • .: .• ·., • • I :' • ,° /"'_. 1: .... I ,.-.,, I .,,.,_,.. /: .. : ~~~-.;; .. ;,.:. e; ~I .t~ , .. ·_, .. /-;,,..J _ _.; 'I I •' I ·l/ ,I. ::;,,, (,,{/ ... ,,. ,:; '"'~· -;.-/ '":,.,,._ .• , ~ ~Jc.., ,, ESGIL CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) 560· 1'468 DATE: IJ_Ait-P-L-I~ /la,:J'OtffsDI CT I Oti; D PLAN CHECKER JURISPICTION: C A R.L.'5 BA t, PLAN CHECK NO: . _______ i_7 __ -__ '2aa.,'? __ 7 ______ A-------------,- PROJECT ADORES S: "2,.-(:) __ dj_J ___ ~------~--~--·~-· ...... flr'.....-~----- 8 FILE COPY UPS D DESIGNER PROJECT NAME~ D D D I] D D 0 The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where n~c;essary and substantially comply with.the jurisdiction's building codes • . The plans transmitted herewith.will. substantialJy comply. with the jurisdiction's building c;odes when minor deficien- cies identified · . are re·solved and checked by building.department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should'be corrected and resubmitted for a comple.te_ re~heck. The check list transmitted herewith is fo~ your information. The pians are being held at E~gi1 Corp. until corrected plans are submitted for recheck.· Tl'le applicant's copy c;,f the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to return to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy,of the check li~t has be~n sent to: · R,. C,..oo H ss . . ()P\ 'Ck L.,L,P "i Esgil staff did not ad'f1ise the applica.nt contact person that plan check has been completed. Esgil staff did been completed. Date contacted: advise applicant tha!:the plan check(has -~ Person contacted: ~ .Co:JfD\:-S _ co~=c';f--n6~ bl ~J l?(;"J Telephone i <.:.1q 6~4-~4-4-<t REMARKS: ___________________________ ~---- By: ,cfd .. ~ . / . Enclosures: ------------ESGIL CORPORATION PUR ama 110 •. ·-"'---'~...,7f'-.-"""-z=-rs __ 1 _________ _ J'IJRISDicrIOK: C..AR.L~BAD m:. e. Coo,1,4e,5. '121'20 .OCCDP~:__,;;B;..._· '2. _____ S_H_a--"--L._L.'--------- JOILDING ,l;JSE:, ___ ....,.------~-- .ffPE QP ~OM:._-:SZ::.._. _-_..J...--____ _ \.J. o~ AJ?..eA Sap: 5, opAP..e.A Se.P.: ACliJAL AREA: 94-'10 ~,_-?Ol'a FT.._ Sl'0RIES:, ______________ _ I BEIGB:1;: ____ _..._ __ ~_2 _______ _ SPRDIILl!RS:. ____ ~_o~-------- OCCDPAB? LOAD:. ____ 14-_c:,_@-_._\OO _____ ~_,_-:;f-/ ... o .... c. ... S:,,_ I 'ln!UUnPC, -lk.. 3? YARD~ OU_ ,WO ~DE. s -=·------.--------------- PI.Alf CORRECrIOK sen:r GENERAL COMMERCIAL Date pl.ans received by jurisdiction:_..,.. __ _ Dat;e plans received by Esgil Corp.:.,. __ s,_/_1s_/_i_1_ Date initial plan check completed: __ ~_1..,..1 /_~_7 __ By:, ___ E_ . ..,.H-~ ___ 11=;. __ R..., _________ _ Applicant contact person: _R. ___ ._c._o_o __ V\ __ B_s _____ T.el. G::i\11 '764-~448'. Plan check is limited to technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws.regulating e~ergy conservation, noise attenwition and access for the handicapped. The plan check is based on regulations enforced by the Building Inspection Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. Present California law mandates that . construction comply with Title 24 and the applicable model code editions adopted, with or without changes, by-the various state agencies authorized to propose building re$Ulations for enforcement at the local level. Code sections cited are·based on the 1982 UBC. The above regulations apply to construction, regardless of the code editions adopted by ordinance at the local level. The circled items listed need clarification, modification o~ change. All items have to be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and . regulations. Per Sec. 303 (c), 1982 Uniform · Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. -To speed up the r·echeck process, note on this list for a copy) where each correction item has · been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, specification, etc. Be sure to enclose_the marked up list when you submit'the revised plans. L:i:st No. 30, GENERAL COMMERCIAL, WITHOUT ENERGY OR LOCAL ORDINANCE OR POLICY SUPPLEMENTS 1 4/23/86 .. (9 Please 1!18ke all c;o~ections on the original tracings-and submit two new sets of prints, and any original plan sets that may have been ret~ed· to_you by the jurisdiction,.to: Esgil Corporation, 9320 Ches~peake Drive, Suite #208, San Diego, Califomia 92123,· (619) 560-1468.- _;;f. Please·make all corrections on the original tracings-and submit two new sets of prints, and any orig:i:Jial plan sets that may have been returned to you by the jurisdiction, to: ' The jurisdiction's building department. B. GINIRAL © Provide the site address and a vicinity sketch on the Title Sheet. ·y. Provide the names, addresses and telephone numbers of the owner and the· responsible design professionals on the Title Sheet. @ All sheeµ of the plans and the first sheet of the calculations are required to be signed by the Califomia licensed architect or engineer responsible for the.design. Please include the Califomia license number and the date the plans are signed. @ Indicate on the Title Speet whether or not a grading permit is required for this project. 2 4/23/86 0 ·Show on the Title Sheet all buildings, structures, walls, etc. included under this · application •. Any portion of the project shown on the site plan that is not included with the building permit application filed should be clearly identified as 11not included" on the site plan or Title Sheet. /. Provide a Building Code Data Legend on the Title Sheet. Include the following code information for each building proposed: Occupancy Group Description of Use Type of Construction Sprinklers: Stories . Height Floor Area Yes or No Justification to exceed allowable area in Table 5-C. Justification to exceed allowable height or . stories in Table 5-D. c. siD PI.All /. Provide a fully dimensioned site.plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow, property lines, easements, streets,. existing and proposed builclings and structures, location of yards used for ·allowable increase of building area and dimensioned setbacks. ® Provide a statement on the site plan stating: "All property lines, easements and buildings, both existing and proposed, are shown on this site plan11 • @ Area separation walls may separate po;tions of a building and allow each portion to be considered a separate building, however, the area separation wall nn.µ;t be four-hour in Iype~I, II-F.R., III and IV buildings; and two-hour in Iype II-one-hour, Type II-N and Type V buildings. Section 505 (e) 1. ~-Openings in f?ur-hour area separation walis · are required to be_P.~~tected with three-hour fire-resistive assemblies, and 1-1/2 hour fire-assemblies in two-hour area separation walls. Section 505 (e) 1. -, ' X. Openings in area separation walls are . limited to 25 percent of the length.of the wall in.each story. Section 505 (e). 4Yif area separation w_ails do not extend to the outer edge of horizontal projections, (balconies, roof overhangs, canopies, marquees and architectural projections), the exterior walls,. and projecting elements above, must be of one-hour construction on each side of the area separation wall for a distance equal to tp.e depth of the projecting elements. Openings in the one-hour walls must be·protected with three-fourth-hour assemblies. Section 505 (e) 2. %.'All area separation walls must extend in.a continuous straight vertical plane from the· foundation to a point 30 inches above the roof, but may terminate at the underside of the roof sheathing if the· roof/ceiling is two~hour construction. Section 505 (e) 3. y Two-hour area separation walls may terminate at the roof sheathing provided that: a. Where the roof/~eiling framing elements are parallel to the walls, such framing and elements supporting such framing shall be of not less than one-hour fire-resistive construction for a width of not less than 5 feet on each side of the wall. b·. Where roof I ceiling framing elements are perpendicular to.the wall, the entire span of such framing and elements supporting such framing shall be of not less than one-hour fire-resistive construction. c. Openings in the roof. shall not be located within 5 feet of the area separation wall. Section SOS (3). /!· No openings in the roof are permitted within 5 feet of a two-hour area separation wall if parapets are not provided. Section 50_5 ( e) 3. /0· Area separation walls, which separate portions of buildings having different heights, may terminate 30 inches above the lower roof level, provided the exterior wall for a height of 10 feet above the lower roof is of one-hour fire-resistive construction with openings protected by three-fourths-hour assemblies. As an alternate, the wall may terminate at the sheathing of the lower roof, provided roof/ceiling elements, if parallel to the wall, are one-hour construction for a 10 foot width along the wall at the lower roof; where the lower roof/ceiling elements are perpendicular· to the wall, the roof/ceiling elements shall be one-hour for the entire span. In each case, construction supporting the roof/ceiling shall also be one-hour construction. Section 505 (e) S. @ IF TJ...1e AeE;A ..57PAl?&rtotJ 11)6LL &, j?RovJDED tN Luu/ o,E &e& .6PR.!Nk,Lef2,s, Pc.e.C,&Rt.S,Bt-JQ QFM?!N_4/JCe EC>/? BLOG5 > /()(X)O l='T."; Lr Mv_ .. sr .ee A. ·+ He, 0J:,t:;1-L.1 5 4/23/86 • > ~11/ Exit doors should ·swing in the direction of /egrees when serving occupant load of 50 or more. Section 3303 ( d). See doors _________ _ / ¥ Exit doors shouli be openable from the ins;i.d~ without the use of a key, special knowledge, or effort. Se~tion 3304 (c) [Note that exit 4oors- serv~ 10 or less occupants may have a night l~tch, dead bolt, or security chain per Title 24 i-3303 (c).J ~it doors should be a-minimum size of 3. fe~t by 6 feet 8 inches with a minimum door-swing of 90 degrees. Maximl,Jm leaf width is 4 feet~, Section 3304 (e). ' 111/nie net dimension (clear ~idth) at doorways /should be used in determining exit widths required by Section 3302 (b). Section 3304 (e). In consideration of door thicknesses, panic hardware, door swing etc., the required exit. widths have not been furnished. See door Ilia) Regardless of occupant load, a floor or ~amling not more than 1/2 ~ch below the threshold is required on each side of an exit door. Section 3304 (h). ~Doo~s should not project more. than 7 inches into the required corridor width when fully . opened, ~or more than one-half of the required corridor width when in any position. Section 3305 (d). -l~evolving, sliding and overh~d doors are not_ permitted as exit doors if the occupant loai:J. exceeds 9 or the exit door serves a hazardous area.· Section 3304 (g). 11 4/23/86 yr. A door may open over a sta~~ay landing _provided the door, in ~y position, does not reduce the clear area of the landing, in the direction of travel, to less than one-half the required width of the stairway. Section 3306 (g). ~Ramps required by Table 33-A shall not exceed 1:12; other exit ramps 1:8. Ramps steeper than 1:15 shall have handrails as required for stairways. Minimum size landings and landing clearances must be provided. Section 3307. ~: Stairway width must be at least 44 inches when serving more than 50 occupants; 36 inches when less than 50; 30 inches when used as a private stairway serving.less than 10 occupants. Section 3306 (b), Section 3301 (b). · 124• Seventy eight inch minimum headroom clearance / for stairways should be indicated on the plans. Section 3306 (p). Note that this is from a . plane tangent to the stairway tread nosings. _,.-125. Stairway handrails should not project more than 3-1/2 inches into the required width. Trim may not project more than 1-1/2 inches. Section 3306 (b) .' ?26. Enclosed· usable spa~e under interior or exterior stairways should be protected on the enclosed side as required for one-hour fire-resistive construction. 2 x@ 1611 O.C. nailers. Section 3306 (m) (n). _;vr'l. Landings should not be reduced in width more than 7 inches by a door when fully open. Where· doors open over landings, the landing shall have a length of not less than 5 feet. Section 3306 (g) and Section 3304 (h). •' -~---- ...: : : 14 ~ Provide a conq:,lete architectura; · section of 7~e-corridor, and exterior exit balcony, showing all fire-resistive materials and details of c9nstruction for all floors, walls, roof-·and all penetrations. Section 3305 (g). ~ Ceilings of combustible materials cannot be _ S\l!ipended below the.o~e-hour corridor ceiling, Section 3305 (g). ;ftcr: Corridor walls may terminate at the ceiling only if the ceiling is~ element of a one-hour fire-resistive floor or roof system • . Section 3305 (g). ·, 150, See attached details for approved meth~ds of /2roviding one-hour corridor construction.· 151. When two exits are required, dead end /corridors and exit 'balconies are limited to 20 feet. Section 3305 (e). ~-Exterior exit balconies cannot be located in areas where pr9tected openings are required. Section 3305 (i). II. :att SIGIIS (i§} Exit s:l,gns are required for exits serving an occupant load exceeding 50. Show all required exit sign locations. Section 3314 (a). ~-Show that exits are lighted with at least one foot caµdle at floor level. Section 3313 (a). _)5'.s. Show that the power supply for exit illumination and exit signs is provided by two separate circuits. (Occupant load exceeds 50 in I occupancies·and 100 in.H occupancies and 300 in all others). Section 3313 (b) 1, 14 4/23/86 1'6-Show separate sources of power for exit. / illumination and exit signs. (Occupant load exceeds 999 in A-1, 500 in A-2/2,1, 150 in churches, 100 j,h I 1s, 500 'in B-2 occupancies)·. Section 3313 (b) 2. Y._· Ihe exit sign locations as shown are not adequate. J8· Provide notes and details to show the elevator will comply·with Sections 5101 through 5105. O. GLASS AllD GLAZilE l~-Specify on the window schedule the glass type and thickness to show compliance with Table 54-A and B. _yio. Specify safety glazing for glazing in hazardous locations such as glass doors, glazing adjacent to-such doors and glazing adjacent to walking surfaces, Section 5406. 16(. Glazing, in the same wall plane as a door, / must be safety glazing if within 1211 of the door and less than 6011 above the walking surface, unless the glazing is leaded or faceted glass. Section 5406 {d) 7, '}b'-· Glass in excess of 9 sq. ft. with tp,e lowest -edge less the 18 inches above a walking surface shall be safety glazing or shall have a horizontal·member not less than 1-1/2 inches in width and located between 24 and 36 inches above the walking surface. ·@ Provide fire sprinklers lj-1120 • OUT ' llOWl=t/S:R... ;5E:-E CO,ee. • AX>, 4-"E! I Sectio_n 5_06, 507, 508 or·· 3802. See als9 jurisdiction ordinance. ~ When serving more than 100 sprinkler heads, automatic sprinkler systems shall be supervised . · by an approved' central, proprietary or remot;e, station service, or shall be provided with a local alarm which wili give an audible signal at a constantly attended location. }84;_·· Provide class ___ standpipes per Section 3807. A first story as allowed by Section 702 shall be included in determining the number .. of stories when determining if standpipes are r~quired. Section 3806. Y-_ Provide a copy of the project soil report prepared by a ~lifomia licensed architect or civil engineer. The report shall include foundation design recolllll8Ildations based on ·the engineer's findings and shall comply with UBC Section 2905. ~-Specify on the foundation plan or structural / specifications sheet the soil classification, the soiis expansion index and the design bearing capacity of the foundation. ~Provi'd~ a letter f~om·the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it;. has been determin~ that the recolllll8tlqations in the soil report are properly incorporated into the plans~ (When required by the soil report). 16 4/23/86 188. The foundation plan does not comply with the / following soil report reco~endation(s) for this project ________________ _ .yacf.' Provide notes on th~ foundation plan listing the soils report recomnendations for founda~ion slab and building pad preparation. 9 Note on the foundation plan that: "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building Department ~oundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the Building Official in writing that: a. the building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report: b. the utility trenches have been properly backfilled.and compacted, and; c. the foundation excavations, forming and reinforcement comply with the soils report and approved plan11 • ~ Provide spread footings for concentrated loads designed for 1,000 psf soil bearing or per bearing value as determined by an engineer or architect. Chapter 29. l~how height of all foundation ·walls. Chapter 23. · ~ Show height of retained earth on all foundation walls. Chapter 23. 19V'Show di~tance from foundation to edge of cut /4r fill slopes and show slope and heights of cuts and fills. chapter 29. 1r-Note on the plans that wood shall be 6 inches above finish grade. Section 2516 (c) 7. -?'.· Show stud size and spacing. Maximum allowable stud heights; bearing wall: 2 ·x 4 and 2 x 6 max. 101 ; non-bearing: 2 x 4 max. 141, 2 x 6 max. 20 1• Table 25-R-3. . ,229. Studs supporting two floors, a roof and / ceiling must be 3 x 4 or 2 x 6 at 1611 o.c. Ta)>le 25-R-3. @ Note an A.I.T.C. Certificate of Compliance for glued laminated wood members shall be given to the building inspector prior to erection. Section 306 (f). ?:r( Detail all post to beam and post to footing 7-~~nnections and reference the detail to the\ plan. Section 2516 (m). \ 4 Detail shear transfer cormections, including roof and floor diaphragms, to shear walls. Section 2513. fa Specify nail size and spacing for all shear walls, floor and roof diaphragms. Indicate required blocking. Maintain maximum diaphragm d~sion ratios. (Iables 25 I, J, K) and Sectio~ 4713 (d). 2~. Show 311 x 411 or 211 x 611 studs. i.rl first story / of three story building. Table 25-R-3. 2~ Provide truss details and truss calculations /for this project. ?~Provide roof framing plan ~d floor frami.rlg ?;;:~. Section 302 (a~ 7. ~ Provide £raining sections through SectiQn 320 (a) 7. 19 4/23/86 2~Specify all header sizes for opening over 4 1 wide. Section 2517 (g) 5. 23.Y-Provide calculations for main vertical and /horizontal framing members and post footings • Section 302 (a) 7. ~O. Provide calculations for lateral loads, shear / panels, shear transfer and related. Section 302 (9) 7. . ;~Show.on the plans all structural requi;ements /d~veloped in the structural·calculations. ~2~ Columns and posts located on concrete or / masonry floors or decks exposed to the weather or to water splash or in basements and which support permanent structures shall be supported by concrete piers or metal pedestals projecting above floors unless approved wood of natural resistance to decay or treat wood is used. Section 2516 (c) 4. · ~Individual concrete or masonry piers shall project at least 8 inches above exposed ground unless the columns or posts which they support are of approved wood of natural resistance to decay or. treated.wood is used. Secti9n 2516 (c) 4. 25J¥. Incorporate in the plans ·or specifications /the attached "Title 24 Mandatory Requirements" and the 11'.ritle 24 Construction Compliance Statellient Requirements11 • ?~/Please see_ additional corrections, or Tr~1cs, on the following page. · the jurisdiction has contracted with ~gil Corporation loca,ted ~t 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, Califomia 92123; telephone number of 619/560-1468, to perform the plan check for your project·. u·you have any questions regarding these plan -check items, please contact beJ.Je Ueie~ (1tRC.fJ. J.:5r~) 6L eAJ AJ:>"9MEJC. { !:JJt:Re,'/) at Esgil Corporation. !hank you. Enclosures: 1. -2. 3. 21 4/23/86 ,], ,. ... ENERGY mNSERVATION mRRECTIONS -LOWRISE OFFICE BUILDINGS On January 1, 1~87, new standards, and a new design manual, went into effect to govern the energy design for new heated or cooled lowrise office buildings, (i.e. 3 stories or less). '.!Jle new standards and design also apply to alterations or additions involving heated or cooled space in exi~ting lowrise office buildings or exi~_ting shell or speculative buildings wherein heated or cQoled office space is being proposed or lighting is being extended·to new ~onditioned space. l'he new standards (214 pages) arid the new "Designing for Compliance" manual (400+ pages) contain forms and design ins·tructions that are essential to developing a complying design. To order the standards and manual you can contact the ca1ifornia Energy Commission; Accounting Office, 1516 North Street, MS #2, .Sa~ramento, california 95814 (Ielephone (916) 324-3014). . \ ' Please address the circled items 'and, when resubmitting, provide a copy of this showing the page, detail, etc. where each circled item ha.s been addressed. In new or existing buildings a Certificate of Compliance (Form CF-1) ·urust be completed and imprinte4 on the plans if HVAC or lighting is being -extended to a new conditioned space. (l-13 Manual). A Certificate of Compliance {CF-1) is required to be imprinted on the plans for shell or speculative buildings where lighting, HVAC · or other illiprovements will be made by the tenants. (Manuai 1-13) Multiple Certificates of Compliance {CF- 1) are required to be imprinted on the plans for specul~tive pr shell buildings, ~ere the final occupancy is not known at the time of tbe original building permit. l'he multiple CF-1 documents should address the potentiai uses, i.e. office, retail sales,.etc., and should apply the appropriate standards to the specific occupancies. (Manual 1-22) l'he Certificate of Compliance (CF-1), Page 1, must be signed in the lower right by the licensed person who is attesting that the design complies with the regulations. (Manual 1-14) 9 l'he upper left corner· of the Certificate of Compliance (CF-l), Pages 1 and 2, must show the name of the documentation author, who need not be a licensed person. (Manual 1-14) l'he owner of the building must sign in the appropriate place on Page 2 of Certificate of Compliance (CF-1). {Manual 1-14) l'he design entities (electrical, etc.), must. sign in the appropriate space on Page 2 of Certificate of Compliance (CF- 1) • (Manual 5-4) Note · on the plans, ne{lr the imprinted Certificate of Compliance (CF-1), "A separate copy of the Certificat~ of Compliance (CF-l) has been retained by the owner and will be made available to future owners or future tenants." (Manual 5-4) '.\- Note on the plans, near the imprinted Certificate of Compliance (CF-1), 11At the time of pex:mit issuance, the permittee will provide an approved copy of the Certificate of Compliance (CF-1) to the jurisdiction", for filing. (~C Section 302 (a) 7). ~({ If a Certificate of Compliance (CF-1) was previously-prepared for 'this entire building, or for improvements or alterations in this bui1ding, provide a copy of the approved Certificate of Compliance (CF-1). (Manual 5-4) @::-w The building is a mixed use buildipg and a Certificate of Compliance (CF-1)· must be prepared for each use· unless the subordinate occupancies total less than 1,000 S.F. ~ are less than 10%.of the total conditioned floor area. -;:: 0812-Dei3g (Manual 1-22) _ ' 0/1,/ At:Pi /,1.,p,uo S, c~ a r I'~!!. C r--"-1 ~ On CF-1, Line· l, show the occupancy type, i.e. lowrise office. @:-~ On CF-1, Line 2, show the occupancy group B-2. 8 On CF-1, Line 3, show the package selected, i.e. · A, :s·, C, · D, E or Performance Approach. @::~ On CF-1, Line 4, sh~w the cond~tio~ed floor area being addressed by the documentation. · 9 On CF-1, Line 5, show the proposed or. · · existing total resistance(¾) for the roof. If different types of roof, complete CF-2. Complete a CF-3 if only one roof type. OB-17 ·Ort CF-1, Line 6, show the minimum allowed total resistance (Rt) for the roof taken selected. from the package you /re1-1.1 0(3 -/(.-? ~On CF-1, Line 7, show the proposed or existing total resistance .(Rt). for exposed floors or soffits separating conditioned space from non-conditioned space, using Form CF-2. Provide a Form CF-3. · (Slab-on-grade floors are not considered to be floors for this item.) OB-19 On CF-1, Line 8, show the minimum -allowed total resistance (Rt) for the floor taken from the-package you selected. /OB-i°o) On CF-1, Line 9, if there are different '"..,.._.../ types of walls, show the proposed or existing average total.resistance(¾), using CF-2. If only one wall type,. only CF-3 need be completed. §} On CF-1, Line 10, complete CF-2 if all. . opaque walls and doors have ·the same heat capacity, generally a H~t capacity less than four. If there are multiple walls having different heat capacities, this may be left blanx. OB-22 On CF-1, Line 11, show the minimum required total resistance (¾) for opaque walls and doors. If multiple walls, having different Heat capacities are proposed, show the area weighted average using CF-2. @ On CF-1, Line 12, show the total exterior wall area for the entire building or that portion covered by the new standards. !he exterior wall area should include opaque walls, doors and windows between the floor and the bottom of the floor, or roof, above, that separate conditioned space from non- conditioned space. Provide a CF-2. ~:. ~ On CF-1, Line 13, show the total glazing in walls separating conditioned space from non-conditioned space •. Provide a CF-2. 0, ,'\-< .,, r:::::..·--.... <...,~ On CF-1, Line 14, show the percent of ~xterio~ wall,. between conditioned and _ non-conditioned space, that is glazed; i.e. tine 13.d-ivided 'by Line 12 times 100. (oi;u') On ·CF-1, Line· 15, show the average "'---~ shading coefficient for all glazing, supported by a CF-2. If only one type of glazing, no calculatiQn is necessary just enter the shading coefficient for the glazing. OB-27 On CF-1, Line 16, enter-the allowed percent of glazing, for the $elected package, based on the ave.rage '~hading coefficient shown on Line ·1s. · This entry should be greater than the Line·14 entry. --o:B-28 On CF-1, Lines 17 through 21 should be I left blank for lowrise office buildings. OB-29 On CF-1, Lines 22 through 29, enter the proposed area of skylights and the allowed · area per the package selected. If more than 8 skylights attach 'a separate sheet. /:Z 11 St.t?A@ ; _;;.. J ,•J lf i~ /"i,..,:-..:.1,,..•1,-·~·~ I /i;-,::.,., .-.-• ,~.,.·-...,, ...... , -...'f r-., ,If.,. ; • ,-:,t: .... ...,, I' ' •.,,.1 -( I -.\ • ( /,,.; 7' e I? I .I'-·: ,1.J ,qp P ') v ;A ::.... d ...... 1 '-'t' ) ~ Ao 1/,.Li1!f. .A l.;ci/>'.r oiC "i'•:11!! !.../st:: ri1 s · /··"'/A;.Jt.-'..ftL ) b._.} 0/? I( ,g /--! I£ t;'J",5 Dates . -----Jurisdiction .. C~BL. 58'40 Prepared byr E,M1:1e:e · VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE q Bldg. Dept. p Esgil PLAN CHECK NO. '97-"287 I BUILDING ADDRESS 209/ LA~ J>,41.UAS "l.: " _,,, '· APPLICANT/CONt'ACT B. tooMl:3:S BUILDING OCCUPANCY ___ B_-e ____ _ TYPE OF CON s IA/ {-SH. 1..) TRUCTION -EL \ BUILDING PORTION BUILDING AREA ,. ti. o;:: /1.eE/J .:SEP WPLL C/4-70 ..s. JI ,, ii I.I .501'2 .. Air ConditioninR": Comm.ercial Residential . Res. or Comm. PHONE NO. t./11-58~ 34-J_g· . DESIGNER PHONE ------ CONTRACT~R/,PHONE /11 ' <2, -VALUATION J , VALUE 1 / MULTIPLI.Jm ~ ~ 4--Z-'2,-0 ,,;r:o-o rl, ~- ,-/~"y/A. ~ ,, I ?o ':3 / 1,,/ .. @ @ : : .. -~· Fire Sprinklers @ -~'J/ __ "~?---- .. Total Value fee-Adjusted To Reflect /4-, LI-$~ , D Energy Regulations {fee OHandicapped Regulations • --- ~ ~Z5 1 lo 7 lt> .065) /1-z-~ 1qfv/ Building Permit fee. $----------------~'--rl---~-;:;;;..~-:;;...o-· __ · __ Plan Check fee $ $ ~ _::..___ ________________ -,,.::;;-~--__.;:;.------- c OMMEN rs .... : _____________ l---t---t--H--'1----·7_~_1 __ _ (6)0 D .... =#: u 0... N =#: u u R{~ ENGINEERING CHECKLIST LEGEND Date: 6. Plane :::::-;=h,:..,e,...c~k_,_N::":-""o-'. '---~:c:,-----.:;::;:-=--_.--------I tern Complete Project Address: --=-=-L,.1--=~.......::.._.__"----P r o j e ct Name: I tern Incomplete -Needs Your Action Field Check 1 , 2, 3 Number in circle indicate~ plancheck number that deficiency was identified ~EGAL REQUIREMENTS Site Plan 1. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn o scale. Show: North arrow, property lines, easements existing and proposed !;itructures, streets, existing street improve- ments, right-of"'"way width and dimensioned setbacks. 2. Show on Site Plan: Finish floor elevations, elevations of finish grade adjacent to building, existing topographical lines, exjsting and proposed slopes, drive"'!'ay a,,d percent (%) grade and drainage patterns. t/~Per8rad,~j/Jla.. 3. Provid_e legal description of property. 4. Provide assessor's parcel number. PERMITS REQUIRED Grading s. Grading permit required. 6. Grading plans in plan check PE P£~·8'J· I&'". 7. Need the following completed prior to building permit issuance: A. Grading plans signed. B. Grading permit issued. C. Grading completed. D. Certification letter and compaction reports submitted. E. Grading inspected an_d permit signed off by City inspector. 8. Right-of-Way Permit required for work in public right-of-way (e.g., driveway approach, sidewalk, connection to water main,etc). 9. Industrial Waste Permit application required. To be filled out completely and returned to Development Processing. REQUIRED REMARKS: 1 0. Park-in-Lieu fees required. Quadrant=---=======-· Fee Per Unit: ----' Total Fee: ___ _ 11. Traffic impact fee .required. k}.t; );~ h;?c ftQ',) C.e,)r~ Fee Per Unit: . · , Total Fee: 'ffEJti>9.0V . t· tr i;=ss,')Cc:..lcs 12. Bridge and Thoroughfare fee required,~.; , .. , Fee Per Unit: . , Total Fee: Y/' /9 /2,<JV . / - 13. Public facilities fee required. , /f-0 f <"--....!-yf~ 14. Facilities management f1e reguired. Fee: ,)pf '1 J~ ~ IJ I. f; .Cc E"S6i j C'.e. }t'" ~~ , 15. Additional EDU's req'tilrecN 1. 90 . Sewer connection fee: #2 C/.<J'O,LJD Sewer permit no. 3/(t;B 16. Sewer lateral required: ------.,...,,..-----,------------------. /t>·o .JI.. TIF ~ J.1/,, '/82,f X ,ti=x~, = rr'Bri/f 0. K. to issue: If you have any questions about ahy of the above items identified on this plan check, please call the Development Processing Department at 438-1161. . l L ,; Q) Q) +' +' n, n, C C Q) +' n, C co .. Plan Check No. 87-261 "C Q) PLANNING CHECKLIST Address ZO'f / Lt:is ~Lm&s DI?.. .~ Type of Project and Use COMMeRctAL /rt1:ouSTR1i:11.. 6UILOl!'.::'§z .................... ...=-.......... ....,7,___ .................. =----==a.......___ Zone _f?._-..... M ___________ _ Use Allowed? YES A NO __ ~~~ 'f~ D 0 Setback: Front Q/( Side 0(( Rear oi< Discretionary Action Required YES __)S_ NO __ Type PIP 8'-5 ODO DOD ODO Environmental Required YES ~ NO --- Landscape Plan Required YES~ NO __ _ Comments -------.--------,----------------"- Coastal Permit Required YES NOL Additional Comments CAR1.,5BAO o'tHOOL D1~,g,cr ~ct ~ ~. t/2l/je7 DATE b-8-87 ,, . 2560 ORION WAY CARLSBAD, CA 92008 <ltitp of <lCarl~bab FIRE DEPARTMENT PAGE 1 OF _L TELEPHONE (619) 931-2121 APPROVED DISAPPROVED PLAN CHECK REPORT )( PLAN CHECK# A7 -rJ.S-7 PROJECT --=L::;...:c> ...... f---=8 _ __.8'---"~__,__/?......._f) ___ ~ ADDREss :)..o 9 I LA s ;OA I 114A s: ARCHITECT ____________ ADDRESS Seo No. AcAfllo Alv&HONE <i3ta-Att7-rlBt OWNER S1-E-t'ICA LAtJo Gf"oi..tp 1 tN~-ADDRESS GIP['IOA le; PHONE ,. 9 / ~o~ OCCUPANCY 'R-P-,,, CONST. v-N T0TALSQ.FT. /'-l,,'f82. STORIES ___ r=---- ~SPRINKLERED D TENANT IMP. --------------~------------- ___ 1. --. 2. _ 3. -Ji-4. __ 5_ _:i__5_ APPROVAL OF PLANS IS PREDICATED ON CONFORMING TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS AND/OR MAKING .THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS: PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND PERMITS Provide one copy of: floor plan(s); site plan; sheets ~-----~------------- Provide two site plans sho~ing the locatior:i o_f all existing fire hydrants within 200 feet of the project. Provide specifications for the following: _______________________ _ Permits are required for the installation of.all fire protection systems (sprinklers, stand pipes, dry chemical, halon, CO~, alarms, hydrants). Plan must be approved by the fire department prior to iRstallation. The business owner shall complete a building information letter and return it to the fire department. FIRE PROTE·CTION SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT The following fire protection systems are required: (, 3 3 /:' 00 ,._ J.) isf Automatic fire sprinkler.s (Design Criteria: NFPA-J 3 ~ _ 1_.J le!'*'-- tfDry Chemical, H~lon, CO2 (Location: ----------------------~-- D Stand Pipes (Type: · D Fire Alarm (Type/Location: ___________________________ _ ~ 7. flre Extinguisher Requirements: pi One 2A rated ABC extinguislier for·each '°() 0 sq. f\. or portion the,reof with a travel distance to the nearest extinguisher not to exceed 75 feet of traveU D An extinguisher with a minimum rating of ' · . to be located: t:(other: ,IK 1fl/1Ju.srm;1-/ /_µ.JAWA,,C>U {AS-R (,/' /1.Rhl'i<f'.() ,>< 8. · Additional fire ~ydrant(s) shall be pr6vided l)f'J ~111£ (~ <.,rr-pl11t>J) 19. )( 10. 111. " __ 12. )( 13. __ 14. -·-. _15. EXITS Exit doors shall be openable from the inside without the use of a key or any special knowledge or effort. A sign stating, " This door .to remain unlocked during business hours"/.sha!I be placed above the main exit and doors OJlt..tJ u.T, l, ~•"'er , rJO,cAn NJ l'Jet. IJ.DApao N . · I · I EXIT sighs.(6" x ¾" letters) shall be placed over all required exilts and directional signs located as necessary to clearly indicate the location of exit doors. ~-;--.""" , GEN'ERAL _) ·--, "--"' Storage, dispensing or use of any flammable or combustible liquids, flammable· liquids, flammable gases and hazardous chemicals shall comply with Uniform Fire Cod.e. · Building(s) not approved for high ~combustible _stock. Storage in closely packed piles shall not exceed 15 feet in·height, 12 feet on pallets or1n racks and 6 feet for tires, plastics and some flammable liquids. If high stock pil- ing .. is to be done, comply with Uniform Fire Code, Article 81. Additional Requirements. ----------------------------- / Sl+f,I Or&o C'A . 9';}. t ;1. o Comp\~ with re~:;~ Plan Examiner· _ 1 lj~ Date~7~-~/_-~8--,f7~-- I Report mailed to architect ___ Met with --'----------'---__ Attach to Plans t-of ~ 8 FOR A-fJ.cH /IfGTS COoH BS· MESQDtiA--, I rl C,, SUBJECT: SHEET NO. STRU-CTURA.L / CALCU.LATIONs· ROBERT f'.IEND.ERSHOT ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED Consulting Structural Engineers ROBERT HENDERSHOT, SE (619) 489-1177 . 350 W. 9TH AVE. SUITE "O" ESCONDIOO, CA 92025 JOB NO. &701 .H BY~ -DATE: l/e,7 I ( ' . {· l . l ! ___ . -----· . i/2.'' f vYw o eJ t? k~ 2 o( s1/,-;-·put2c..1/J : . -~ 7 i lNS0LA-Tt¢ N - Sfiz,1 /J ~~(t.. \.,A,)~ ... -. -· U ~'G-/ q·2>'"2-\\US 0 11 Se-l~N\<.--Z...ONIS . 4 </370 I H j 1G -==-3000 P> 1· -fCJ-::. b~ooupf>,~ f 1 C.. --::. ';2 0 0 O P< f f~ ,:;... 6 °,,, CJ Oo P. f' Soil-~Ntj _ ff<-8-S'SU(Z.c--.2...Sce> Pff -1?e;1-p '? 57>o ps f !Je-4-P -Pl 1ve 4~ 0 psf . DG,4-i? -1-WIJ\l\-? .. -Al.,t, ViJM~ ~--(4-lft... .sJkU.--or-s~.sM I'- ~ A-1°b (,f~Mle-bo (_' ' ..... ---------. --r----. -- I l \ l 1-- ' . ; - i . 1 · ----.-'. f ·-.•.t ). -· --~ 1 ; ~·· .:. _,,.-·-,, -v.-~~__,,,,.. _ __..2:c.=c...0_1 ___,.f"--__,_,29~ __ 0.__,__1 ~@,:;.-i j @-----l~ :i===,J..="-l~\.,,_======'===::::::::::::L= ... ,\¥1===;1 0 ~- c-\ ! \, ~r--•I ....,L._. I =;!, ~ -,, " 0, \ ~l·--= ' -.I) .,, r- ' ~ ---or·-_, --- - --- " \.I .··s:. ~ " ~ 7 2 i \.L / f_,S' @2'f," c,.c.. a+zc ,,. 2 t3 P.sr /,.;;'Ii--$~)( ~ "Z. ,. 11/-oS- /.~I.,< ~.ot; tv:: 9 +-'20 .::-'2 'l P.S!= r /,S",<.,~F ,c IC>"?._ "ti,= _.....;._-,-..;....c..---/365 /.2S -,,:_'5_,10 • - f 1,~ J< S8 ,c 10 1. = '121 /, 2S,< 7, Sr, Pu1?.u1-1s , SZG ~17. I, '2 '5 ,c '5"'0 :. IS S3. 82'5·(/"l. . , ,., :: /b 'fr /,2S"-7,5~ L~to :ii, tu ::.(io+2t:,) 5 f ~o +1~e, -:: 2¥-o m-; /( .. (tDrl~<>)IO .. &Oi:J-1--lf,t,-t>::: 2~c> £:: l,S-.c. :2 'I(,,<. 'Zc, "l. -. b /.2.5"~ lo'Z..'f--1126 ;,/ . ~.S' 5o-e> 11..v ;rt,t.,P e,10 I H. :Zx If or/t.. .ill <i 2'/-'o.c. • TP ~ '5114N F2'/ f/AM6.E:,t:?.5 :Zx~ Pr/(... :ti-.£ C? 2'f-"t>,C.. TO 1'1 1.S~ FZ"N' ,'/4-N't;-ms 2'f-" Cl. t:., 77) /0 I .Sl/4,A./ FS'/' ;/A-Nt,,Q~,S. i.f.y.,ttf OF /t-d 2 ~ 8 1 ~C., 70 ;!.O I Sr3M- WN,..:i if.ti/ IIA-w t;, t::.72, (c.A-,../ f(I/J~~~r 8 I tllv~ . ,--/~,1<,,...,,: 1, C:::J 4 ,v,; z~,<2"~(12>><t'1 -,ll,ZiC2,,c1) $tf)e; · 1 I(? I ~n+t!!;rt. >We 11,-:2. Mcl./¥. £°~VIP. t.C1~ . (l,4 n:, 2G"c, d -/$1ZS"' l-;:t.lf-' tv; fi,+1t,o ,-zt./-e> /2 :: ( f P -f-lt,(1) I 'l.. ; 'U,P r/120 : 2. e.i t> "l I,$~ 2 'ff))( 2 t.f = /'2. zlf- /,7.'> 'JI. /3$,(,, (fa t..l'r'/nr ~~ IA)/ ,~JON TWO t~A.1..11.1s.) 2'f0~21/-"l. /~I) . M = S' +-(~n. -7S'-,-z..) :.. ~o?io s,4-. PV/2.(.1~) ~~I(, PP:/t.. -11--z e ~' o.i::.,· -rv 2 '/-1 S~"4-N· o/2 1/-1. I{,, t.>P:/t.. Ji,/ @ 8' ~C.· ro 2'r' wj '!Joo .J /11/iZII-. ~c,,~. l,.,11/'t1J ~. /t,,/2,tJIJ &>/<. .SO;d;Ji,'2 r1M,, f' o/./€ s,0£ ( 10 'o7]-/1;;12_ --s,oc J..L ~ tz.P5f 1---· --------~ --- ' r ---l ! (IN·L-} R7-.o/ rJ q 'p ~--1,·~-i:~/;,: t l~ t,J 61,,-/3 ~ • p ~ . · II ---'b.. '-'--~ /, S 1-8 -L J6 ,_· " A~ /./'?:/JS'-=. /70 fc /24 :.. ?, 0 fl~ :i (o,o4i,:: M f::. :Ge/-.. 67 IJL I/ ,J(- /2-,4, :::· 6, q 8 ,, < t--/'t-f'a A--:; 11 S ,;;~o1 :C *" .; I b b 'J r, . CkMB(j!. -I 4 -i4 ~-v4 A ~4CJ > ~ ;,07 .I. -::z. '31 bf, ~ rr c;;-f'l... ~ I Yi. " : ?4f-vf ts%~z/ I fr--; 1~7 S..:. 3:t,l · -{(& ::: ,. q, 5"-i {"' -At.''t-:: /. 1 b 7r17 ·, . ,,c. --/vff__-;fJ3, $3-:--· -- I. -=-!J'7SS-_; -~eett-= T'f_,,. , ___ ... --... - : ~--'"!f4>,. -~ 3·, 4·t 1 . 1% ~-4-J~ ~ t24f-V4 ..6 :;:. I 18 (tb )(_/,f . -/,u7'' ,. i r ... -.~-.-' ·---· -.-· --···- ,y> .'(? ··-;r '. r 1 ___ . l .. ______ --···----------··--·- ----: : . ---·-- ·) . .. (/J~~J /A-~ 3,, B ,~ ·. /Z-1$ ~ 1,641'- .2:,,. ::-, CJ I I J ;<:,f S-; I 3 7 f, .,,.. 9,11/ t/-. ·'J-J I'--{ l<B -I) f"l,-~ q/~/4,17/:.. ( Rt-7--) f; " 7, I;-2/·· I I _-t:, ~ w-::-,o> fc.r, /\.-1+::: b7, l w-~ -1vr ,.. _,r q.() f.. 6.-r--+ ,o 1 c 6.r-r/7... ~ >.~t:t ' I I v--'. -I ·(2A-:= (l/, tj vf!-, fc_ l2g ,.., q, ?J ,, ~ ::? , 6x/r-=-, 1 . ~ J -:::-t. ( r, t J. r '2-+ 9 ,11. d h bS ' ~ .2-l~o·,~ -,z.,B ~ io.~1 i=- . -1------,---~----:---.:--- _1_ -.. -· '---· -. ! .. [ I ) \ A-~q1 $ :=--3oJ r....~Jtb{;, I JI c..1t14ef'-~ I ~ ~p-v,c 1:71/g ,z IC,Y-i. /t ~ ·1 q f :z. 3u7 'J_. ~31b<.o II Cf<tNf> (1L"' I . '1--'tf-v& .; ,. / \.:: ·. \,·.=:.-: ·f,.!'i '(J. 9. 9. -.1' t 1 "(! , O·h--11-t"'- '\' I 4' f -:,. q t 1--i'-I tc. I --~ . /4: b . { /21-J}_ __ r .. ~ q.s11..,11/,.1 b1 .. Of -,:. / ;... . 7 .,,,_ 3.4 31., / /St f +· ~ -1~-;7 1:.1; ,· ~ !':. --( t,JJ-4-) \.J\-+ -;. '-h. s ))'- ~-~ q,~-i;((?X t ;frt--tS (, pJ t t,,[]% ?- 0 . K r-A-::.. 10._r'l.. J~. -Rrs-;; q,o-;., .,c,. = :, 6 Ix t, ~ -::. · q 2 : ,j{. . · f'; 4. t b / 1:b IA . . I'-/, • -1.;..J 2.-• oz.c-!"' " ( ~"-) ~A z... t;,1 i I" I/ Ai.t..,~ ,tq t'-. (2-~ :-7.G:, 1 jC, 0 t -;:. 1,.4_ 1, 1.: .:. ~ '. f2-1r-:::. -:2,('; __ ; . t=-: f,2.i;1-::: /,S3 - 'IJ-z_, .,,( ~/wo o fc.--1, -·--.----·-·-· ~-.. ------·--ti - L::,. ~ • t.f {")G/' ~ ;;:::: ~ ~ 7,r ·- I h ?-'j °' J: -=....31.& (;. ~:::. so, . ·n ?A-M:f3,G(?. ;; /-_ :i.4F-V 0 A--:: 6/ $ = /'J..,J "2:. -=--73'6 C A1v. ~f'(Z. -.:; j If- 2'4 f -V4 II "; --- ... ., ~ --.---- t12.,B -to -f ~t1 t.l,tl" ~ A-4-:.' ! : . (P. L ,J J?..1. i, "J, 31-JC- f2s-=-f.bbie.. A :::i • '1-o/-t.l, S:: · 71st) : - 1'--' f ~ ~, s,, /,, ~ ,~ W "-, 0 "3 J:-/i ( ~{"l,,J -12-A r,:-/ f;'. I ,~ fli?,.,. 1,6Cf f- ~ ::: qrJ, 4--B fl'-. (9,.-L) -1.sr" f :).. ~, i71 ',c.-/(, 7, I.., t.J C O ~ (7 f=,/, · ( o-H. .. ) ~A-?-fbJS ic. 12'.~ -:? & ,1<f l -l M.{ "'.'": q B,q 11t k;;. 6 I ~ c./Z, 1 !-;.73?J ~iert P 94-1 '4f--v'tr A-=./2.."> -:t.. -= <;c;~r.r > .,._ 4:fr I ~·,g~i4 :I ' \-1- J.. . ' . ' ' / cJ AA 6 e-p_ ::: 2 fl - 74F-V4 ' -~ i ' :: ~: \I:' ~ ~--- -~~~ ·· .. (·· ·. i l --_____ ._,.. __ .... __. --,----~· ----------·r ........... ~fl. IJtri1&N_ f~v-v-¾r.,.. . . &:> e--C ? /pG 4 ~-n, ~A-., -vy.7 :? ?f-'7 c2-1J~.r 1,/ As~ l<f'l--'r.t.f. ,r> I ~ /,q ,(, tf.. 1,1l:-rt"T 4-7 _A-s~::2-Y · MIIJ, -...f--.,-------~·-·- I l . ' r -- ' --!-·" .. . ·.--,.,_ ... ·--.--.:-· :-· .. -. ·=-·_.·.: -. ·.:-_~:::::::: :-.-·:-".;-;-:;-~. -. -~--- -·--t -·--. -:-~ .. _. _.·--.. --... -: ;-. . . ·.:: .. ,.: .. -· . .-· .. · --~--::· : .-. i:,:.::_--:·'·:~·:::!>}t ?}f: ' -._. :··: .. . . .-:.-._.·_: [,{i1i' l ·, :.--~ ,:_~:] . .. ·-:·:::} lid -· l~\\1' .. . '··:·: ·1-. ( 1--· . 11-~- . . Rlo Ir/ .. U~Ot:;/2 f?cJ/t..-uJJ LoM1i ; (--(fZ.k{' $'1J-'t 'Z4, II f::..10.1.1"2..~S -=-,~ff,e,ft:-. ~IN. ,4-> .,._ ~ oo z._;_6;e,IZ : ,/,j. S. Aj ;/1:-4 <'. (I. ); ~IZ 10. C, (l:.fv, 4-;..q~=j..{.3,8<t: =, ggq 17< f'l.,'( 7 . .::/h.,L (ft/~ I t"o. '-. ,~.d A->.:.,~ Pr--1 =-1.1·94 / ·889 ==--1,rr7 0<->)(,"7..+ /,f:rJ I {A_~ , JB5°":,(. 3 ~I 7-= • 44-3 7»<, 3i-f.J,<.r. :s::. '~z. l'li.f.sf E--/ ,-r-e =-. 44 s . ~:::, -=-• ,::, z... . ct II It-U I M ')'\ -:.. 13 .~G, ( 2.r~1--s--• tt._'2--L) ~ 3 2. ,54 c/>M J.-1 ::-2 'b .Cf 7 '-- /'.:>.s-6 . 'I,. ,., 3 111 11. :> ) ( 2 t; t-t1.) -+ ~ ( .t ,._) -=-a, o_ 7 "'.,. I e = q. 29 C ~ ' "k -• ;> -, o A.::-'2-8_~97 ( \7:r-t1 -z.,J /q:.6;.. s/7.1..;<Cf ... 87::::.. 4 3'2 11 . . . 2-( fv\v.. -=--?i" B c_ \71sx P-) q 1p +(-_is:--" c;,-i;-y/.._ + c ,. '3 'o4 )(4. 3-z..) ---. ";?.2, '3'111K.<. 285 7_11"-Ol'-''. CA-{!&'GH D e:fLfrC!l<>N .... -h/ . -,, .& .,.. 11oo --:Z· I· /vfs::. zz.rC17..r-x(?.,i7c;6 -t G.s;<. ~¾ -1-( /..3/8)(-2, I) ' ' t -~ ~ . . -" ----~ ---J 4{ p 6 ~ /'-1 e,.j-. ' ' . ;. __ .: ___ · ____ Sec-,-;r_r 0h,l ____ [ $ ..+"L<-.1,-· .... .. j_ __ _ t . I ' i l . .._. .. . . .. t . f I L : : : l ' ·L 1 '\ ( &?o//--1 0 vJ/ ope,/JtN{:,_ ft =';Jo6~pJ,' . ~-:.~6'7u::)o ft/ i ! 1-----1---~--r;'~,~ ------· ·-f'ANEL m,WKA/HS:; • '.'_·· . ----- ~ • • ; 1 b I EffGcT(V6 Tll1'4Nt'SS ." 5~ . { 3-" ~=) .4 WT ~ 7:r /S1~ e__,;. t~" ---_ ~t I r' fc.q:::. ( ._"){7);,<l4)(,7S:-'.:'-• 8,o-t'" . ~ ~ fu .,_ -:-( ~{1-9 + ,-1 ~O-) i-.f1.. ,7S::;. -tff' --Jr-~ 1.., I 8 · fefM,c..s W1.1, ~ ~;<, "3,<f./,<./, $-::---~f fS1~ *=" L· vJlrJ\f \Nu ~ "?A>-~,,__ -f,;, -::--?-1,,--i-{ f~1~ -. -r-----·-------•---· -·-· l l I '· . ··t ' i ~ -. -r~ .2.---:Jt-s-c...P/t PA-~ 4,,_,1/?(2./, ~~fp-i-- 6,o · J. "r ¼-I-~ -~-o---3/'t ' ····· i ,· J__ 1 . I ; .. · 'rb!.~ ..,.,I 61.-rs:4 t>feN 1Aic,~ · ·:c; _L-1Ne ·(l) f@l __ ---·--.·---·· ·-... _ • ; 17,,, .. ·_--,,1 ; ~r,. -----~. ~ ------------,-~ -----------~-· ·-._ . I f c.-:.. 3 ooo f<i,' , (: ( .3 ~· i1 1 C tJ +e-l -4 ~ ..;e-rz_;h -r~ 3.oi·I! C:;L.lb ·ru\·:::.. ( · & Ir'+··;.~!/~' , )(..(~ ·-(f;<., ,r-:. , 8 ~ f'u1., ~f ~:./-l~/2)~7-.t-f ~?:£ j><.f.<t;,<,"7-f--~'J65C- . ~ -~ -: . ...i ,t6~ . @P.v. 4> ~ ·9-2;1-.'t-il6~ kl, C) ,:,,.. ;,-/ ~ / ~-/ . '°i7<(-2,j( --; -::,. • ~ V I .. f# ,=.. ~. lb(C;-I a--,.--= (.0. c.J/ -r/2-'f s --,.. {"" e-A--. f/r~-'2.. A-.$ :::,. . 'J /:;(. ..t-/4-1 -:,._ • ? I d-:! 7-1-~-~1..-¾ ':? 4, 8 / I/ M1:t ~ i-4,.(1(4.'EI-•'P-/i-)-6,:.1 (4,ef-3,r)=-/e>o.tr'HC. . . ¢ M >,. C. I 00, tf'p<, ~.J"-9 :::. g·t. (f 6 -//14- . . ! 1t1V "f...e, ~ tJ, z_.9' ,I(_ 71:j ( 4._81-; f ¢£. /--+ 17{ ( r 9 <,Cb) =. 6 ~, 2 8 L::, -==-, gf.4-6 (_ /7:x12-J/t::f,_-t7'--~/:J-.21{ 6.a,'2--8 -~ -:1..,ol/ ti-1-v v{ -~ RT tj' -. I 17 1 g' vl I ~ ) 7.M ;<_/ S°" / .r' -;:, /12, b #/t f< T ::. I 06 c/i 2.. f, : ./:;--' -. :/vf'xf"-7,o°{f = IO~ 4.. w ~ 7..o. r --/f-r>,t¢( 7,at?) X ?-571 · . ~ 4r,24 ut ( .- ( i . \ ( ' /1.- (.,,JI 7'HIN _ C-IM! T / $ 0 / ' , -J'' ' -(-(fl UY'-fA,.f~ tu -rHtc-1~ l I p l,t I ,::._ , 0 4 ,( \-~ )(.. • 1 r-~ ' (). '-f ')... ' f' '-' -i.--,,... \, .o ~ 1. <.f-?<.. ' 7 S-~ / .u f' >1-s ,.,,)~ ,-'0 2-)( I 'L.,c. 7 --.It 8 --r:P.( # 4 ~12.--'' e4 ,Vlr- /,v4 i..1'->, I {_s-,, e f"u cf, "'". ~ 1 ,... v;( ,.~_r .,_ ,.. J,t., I '2.X '7 . -I 't) C( ) I', --bu-/..' "2.. ..+ p .. nc.. ,~.d ~ l/'-' -4-11-3 )(1"1..-)(, ~.$'" -r H V1 -;.-( ,3.i,..1,) ( ~,r'\,t"-.Ct,;i.;..,) ~· '3 S.Ll-8 r1k. cpMi,, ~ ~~z...-i fr/;:_. :c~,... 1,'1.-c, c ~7 c;·.,-i,f_,s.-, J':t-1.f-cs,/~:::.. l-f-r1-I wY 6 ==-1tf.1.;"o( nt,,.__/·/9,6:1--~12.1..xrcf..CTf-:::.. '3,-z.,f 11 Ml,\~ :37S1.f( 11~1~--}_/16 + (,c>'f'l..;x__b,1!!)/,--+ (/,07?..4.._"3.1.-I):::. Jq,ci~;i o/L ', ?ti t;;(/(e:'. . _t'k-'(l,t.,"VTr ..r-" . x. ,.., -l/ ,., ·/t:_11 ~ --rr-~ .,,.. ~-o'-t' -,•• ---------~ ----,{--••-A• -----J --• . i I • ; I {Iµ. • C,. . ·-·· ·---.. -" ____ .. --~" . ' I " . -l .. · ! . -· .. --4 . i --· . 1. . I ,. ~ ' ' . i_· __ --. f'~_i_!i~'.;_~_f>,: .. 1 2,f-1 ( h fM~ _~G. effa_-r, Vl?; 7'1-//c.,/l-/Vt.55' ~ __t"-~11 ' -·--···-----» --!---...... - '. 1 '. µoA-p a. M/r? ~ µ:I ...... -rH s--4' :f-EJff--, M ~ /1-)"' , :,/)(. :s-/2-1 .... ,. 3/ cf ==:. r -:i..J,q2.. -z. a ,, I '3:,(../'LX C.. --I~ 0 -:z.~ . .r ~ tl..t7.../,cg6{.::. 4,'1 ~ ~::. 6ox. 31-f 1. 9 .. -'e It '3~r2..7<,'8.f°' = ,7& C -::..,'7~J l/ d--"'-C -I,.£.--¼ z.. -~B ::.. }, -8 I ff f2-r :,. , q c(:.t::/_.r 1~ , b (, SL f.,1"'~ cl-~ ...,. • 1 t1/i s-r 7. 'J e ) -( 1zt. t i ) c-1. 3 -e } 1 t.., i -XT ,;,_ 7,3't; ' : /·I<-,, I, • ';':.?. '3','S;t>(q. ;:.. ~2 IIY' '1..<1::,--3 . • • ;z. 'l. J ' ll/4. -z_ /Ji.v. ~ 4,1.. t-(,r,< t.1r"J Ii--r < q, 1.'l-;,< 2,f 8) ::.5 .t. fJJC ' < &:,r6 11/4. !p::..; . .I ( -) . iAIS ( l,al(j. . _;_ . ; -.. -.. ------- I . ·l\Jl.---"-----,,;:--r- t.tS e-. fir/<._ 8 . vV/ G..-fe~A-fa.,p._e..!S~ 'If -,o W/2-1./4. , $/2 ? 6 CfiJA-1 U'°/? ) ~ ()G, fv/t.-l., ttJ To t'-v G pv t1--L, t ,-i • .~ t ;. •. --t, 1 ' i ' ( ·1.~tl' ··-.--·· . \7.t V--·/B& .pM~L vIT ::: (bt1J. e~'!::!. .LJNe @ T0 (D G.~S"-_ .f.ov 4,7u-g V; ::--~-(p -1-, ·f4 1 ;( ~ 0 1 ·+ ( 4 + 16/1-)f ic;,,t.. 3 0 1 + ( '1,!' + 17·¼) 13. c;J-x:Ju 1 IL tJ s ~ 'l, '1~!.c.l 1/9 ~ 6-.;> ::-,..;:, 7 I .... :# 6 CHcJJ(/4, 1tA-rt.. (./_ I /\'}.O V4rz.::. '2.,G.-/.81.f-xfo -fZ.,b,<7CJ-"-z,,,o f Lff-tlf?.-JfJ,c;f-:x&0 +(:J +% . '9, bvr t'-/3 . "I r-;<. b o ~ 3 z.. r / 7.1 . V,o· ~ 1,(,f..1C/-XCf-~ t-zJ,:1..7':;x?,,o "!(4-+ f6(1..J0.9f-,<l:,.,. tc '1/4--1-3} I J_ 1 v/4 6 ., _, 3 f, 'f -z. t<. 0 fl-''. ' j l. . ' . ; . ' --. I' \._ . l ··C:.'T ?-&~.rf,<.60,.. ,f//t.(t-.(;,J/t.. -;~c,t:6·2 r-¢o:X~<>Jhc/-= /2,Z;j . ; ··---------· ··------. . ·.------j·-···----;4-r~-12~··v9 "'xl4J/6~f... 9 -:>-,_J?,{··· -· --~ ~-----~--- -l-; . . ' ---... . ' . ' "' .. 1--... -i I . l ! / l t -i (-:fl.'° C/i<lc.+, Gkt",....· ·. t .:. .. • I_ i . ., -~ ~ In .z . Cf-,c, -: i · ·, · i .. i .... I ( · 137°/ f/ If ·rA-f-1~ ·w; .ofGN ltJV/ ie_ c.-,~-~@) ' , -· -···--·----······i-··-· , __ ·, ___ ; _fc.~39~ fS,' ~.?:.69o_oap>,' --,-------:-fi Cf / l' , .... 4'-... ------. ... ··-· /.7..1 .• ~c, 1 -f-,_.,q 7 )'(t-sc x ,7r--=-'2,v'f 2.J.,C f-( "-. T r"y_ t' -~ ~ (.-==7'/-,P-,4-a;;-. @~ 4 .-;-,a,,·~ -;.,'811 . '3,</'vl'-'~ . / . . ll.-f;i ~ l"}.,f..1,1..f/, 811 .-;-"L() ,e d. ~ . 3, B t " . ' I"(,' "f. (}... '>: (f;,..;»<., -VO(i, + 21Jz_ -";:;LI '2,,;,t • g_s-. ::=. • 6 lf, '3 fv1-,.. '?-I q, f,q ( 7.t> I -,6%J -'2..-1 'd ( ~-8 ( --'3 7 ;:::;. b to. t/-3 ,,t,._ fMk-:. t6-~>J.-, 311 ~ ~-¾ f{/J- (.,JI ~~ lv :: ']1 I { 8 y 1·-o . -:::: TZ.,,./, ~ tr /i v.J r..-11.,,t. -a I r,i' :.. ~~, s--:k-r. I /6' , . ' : t,-I ':1f-Ilk-. f,.,\~ "". C ~.>-f __ > 1..-/S) ( /6? /'ff ?-2/10 7.. ::: Jcf.: &z. ' ---~~-. --------- ' ' .& ?-74. '81--f (. ,tr i 6.r) /1.--+ ( "t.r./-c/:;( 1, J 8) =-t/1-78 JI/,. <. !:1, v6 1/{... "tv1 -; . ---...--~------·---__ ..........,__ ____ ,. ___________ ;-------· -------~ ..... ----·· ------- ! 1 . - ' \ <.. .. ( •. -! I I~ - -1----1 • 1'' . -l-·-6-··---11 -I,. o L_ 4 t. 13 "'. 1, 6c,c · .. , £'.12--<:"'x .4 r ,l/.-VS .... ? ·6 .r If • · 11 ::z.. If 2.'' >17 s: ·, k: B l-1 ~ t '!; l . Q---f '2'' 0 • • I ! l 4'/ I I I t------.:-t'----::J=~·-.: .,£; 1<4-" nu:· /t. "'/ 'P.." I I?> -r-s 2-3/4''4> ·µ.~'s. 4 L;/S, · · ~fi -r ,...._(l_· __ o -_, . ~ t ?-" ~ f'-IW . '\)'\v. 'O. J ti ~("?,84t<.l,1 -f-1,,fl,<./,f )~ b -( ;_-11:f.-(.ct-J 6 C/ ~ 4 3. I 1 n./c'-· =+-6 OVT Tkl<-'1-Te,.,<,.,.,, 4 51-1 <!J>"- f-~ ~ 'l1t, -I-~ -f1t-~ 1--v >l-fe:f-fl--, .... '). 11 r- 1'.nft i'V--:._,_·3 ·'.'/,.4--1. . F-f., --3.\,~ -kb h ~ I j 3 8 l( $1y / II t'p A-Jo 7 IJ,.1-7 As ... ,7e~ A-Nqce -r:Mc.i? Sl-letirP... 7.{,cf..1~ · usr,-l,c,NC. /lefr'J(.;/-1Jt-, I . -1--·-------·--------·--·· -_, ---·-· -··------' /£ ( ( 1 .. t .. I -l . _ _L!N~piL-f:4-:N~; vJ/ ifth-w: . i_____ ..... -----. . .:#/¢ t \pvP-t-lN ~ L. '3 ,l. 1.:,(1 'q 4'11-t SM I <-,,_ l3 7 t)<.. '3 ;,( / / :,( ( 3 -=-3 7. ~ ¢::" W ::i.,( 5 7. r-4_) ( l s-1-4/ J..) := / 3/. "L:r-. #"\ ·. . -1, 0 ,._ . 0 ,,.__ 9 I . u .. :.D l'-'::>"c--ex::i ___ s:.,-½c-1 N..., ... c.i .-:-.o 6. c..., · : . ! ' V ',:. '-, s I ~7' B / ~ / c:,E;"Q !#r tv\ ~•I 1 l '2-'.>(8) "i,./8 -:.. I ,o.£' t:tf- /::.v...;_ ( 1,-oS)( /2)(1-.:)=)/. 9?<.12,<~.12r1--:_/4], s k -;,...,"'-'--i-rx/. 3J.x11--,< 3,,~~--12---r · 2-:ff q.. ~//7, ks"'.'/ , /3~ 1,~ r.rl :c / 4-":.(. 'f-~ :fH,, 11 : ,kl -.c.r· r::.,~f ~<J {'"'';.. ~JS- . c..Hec.t~ AtJGU?-To 4;.._ PU/Z..l-lN · b Se-3/ .:i21 cp M, {3 , "'1/ M r::-rA-L ,s; {t7~ / f!,c)v1 C.A fhc. 111 l 400-;.:. b lo --t 4-1.f-<g ;:;._ 1,;..,vr ::. I 4-4-B :i<. 2-7 t 'f-8 S: 1F '.) 1J. . ./ ~ • I r ( . ! ' I 6SIJ · ,. ! -_j~~ ---~ ; I . l: . I ' .. ~G-fS"1tc:...: ~ :0'7..f")(. '3><./,t:i-1.J~ 3J.W f 1/~- :w ,;..-( ; ;~ p/) ( J2..·.+--~,~f9 r;;: J. ==-I. t:Ji,, .6.. 'Ii I, V :::.. ('18,J5;,<./o 1 ~ j--''!/'.~ 6 It:.. ( 10 1 S.fA-c1.v, tvt ,;-( l'fi~ b > C /,;) 1 '?.-I B :;.. .. '2 ~ 82-It/ /l.,f /,!J('. ~ /l-t,,..__--;.. 2-f-B Z..: ~,~ /, <fx 11->< -a,11---s-'Z.::: 2 e z... 4-.s ~ , 0¢ !:/-;<_ I 2.,.<_ "? . t 1--S' ~ • / q / 2,..4(1-(A~ k-P ::;: ~ 1-,-<>J y ~A~> g (./5~[ L 3.XJX 114- u S-e-3/4-1'cp M .B, , Pe-~ ~ s r:.q ¢,</.?;; 0 1. ?.r=-I 44 8 :;,r~ .r1..tT _ :z. t ct.cf-'t ._,< '--=-2..8 '16. #-7 z.3., 8 01c.. 'fOI< j./';C,Tf ~1,,.11/1-.-~\;1 To P~'-'P>-~ {?A-N(f-1.., 4~--:. \ q 8l/..... ~ q °IJ 4 'fe-t,JStoN -:.. \ '1 l1~( 2-.:::.. ~ 9 3 -:f=/- qq 3 . '1'11 r~s-o t-~ ?-/·ab ·7 ,, o f?'1T 1i-u.01..N/4-llLc=- o,., . · 6hSG-1 : SHelrfZ.. :, ·retv(1Dfv fr(U:..t--f. _; · 1 < .f ~ · :=-?oou f~1~ . _ -~-rH1~ f(?,o.-:J.:r1 .u }·v:_f~--f $.Of!: .. 0 fSt. /'f'11.f#::rtftf-e_;--- L ~ f . .. ! c· ( ·. I . ---•' [...t1ne-L Dirs t 4 u . .:.. 2 /<-lZA-(.j --ti-, q q e.!?>(.i~ '2,,(/,_ !7 ,::, ' . . -, I {L. k-tv. ::-'2.. 0 7 - I'-. fZq-_ 16.~.r d ~ 18,(1'2.,,;t-.O,:. t·6,,/'· /Le,,_:: ';).-o,Jf.../'2...)L/v,;,v/ 'fl..~;< 86,'-f7.. ~ £-i; "6 2-#& . T z{ !J //-f :. . g f 'i"peA1t-· tt/' ..,_ v4_ q Cf xtoo.,/ & i.)< 8t, qr, -=-~e.t ~ :i/fc_ --:::;:--''77 /\J O S '71 tz,,/1... r.J f p_c..::r,s. . b t,, I ,.t( e L @.· l 1'fv f-. .(D f ,, C? -;:.. () ,(.,.' 1,. \ ~ • <g. I 7 /L. I 1 J II I f l'-w ?.->S -LttJfeL .-..~!. 1 ' 1.0 I k-,-- t i -- r r ' t '2, ~ f2.A-'-I ~ ~!:'..~/c. f2~((-=> 'J-7:c,a · · ·-1 · -· · ·· ··· · n~---M v. "?-ZJb . 5~f4,c.,c w,o/1"' --18,Jz,I<· · /Cr.{ ~ ,z,l" ~ I ½< 1( 0 .. "' (. q ;<.. 7 f. I J... c,, 6 ::.. ~ !("" 1k:::·,o_ooc.f;([,J.~;,(7x_(2.Cf.b ~. 'f164 . ·····--···· ···----· .. ::i. -:# C:, ,;;I-Y xi-7 ; t.J""' rib+ J 0) /z '; --~· " .. " . t ,,v~~~ • 6'X.f .. tf: I · ·-· -------·-r -~ 1.; x , . -q ; -:=. , (.f 1'1-:"1 :;:::..· I 9·'f O 'H . -_/. J) Sf /'1/, -~ 2./Jt:...i. ~ . . 0/HJ: t.·1_1:.( -~-l ¼ -I} r _ . ·"-_. 1 ··.t-·(l-1)1.l t .. ,:iz.1 .... f - f-1.t ~· l~s:, J It~ I-A1 ~f1-lr:l A-_N JU,, 51 S B -t>I ~ ~o' .(i) I ·--@ . · I 7 0 I -+ @)· -----··········-· -0 -0 .,-· :, . I I ~?off/ 1) l ! . t _J t ! ,, i b}!f?rt-:"! ~ -/..J.N G-&} ----· -. --------.I.. . ". ( ; ~tf~ . . . (!,,;. 1°' :.(3z..t"",! -·K,t.1..( /f-O)fi-) /79I := /CJ,cJ3 I( . . ....... ---···--·---~@" [21' .. -~ ~IN_ ~ Cf) : C. .,,_,-.::. ( 1>'(,4-'?.,. ,<..4~ :-.. _t'"U.,'1...(4.ll¼)/74-' =-l/.7~ t~ .. ' . //, ~t> /, Cf~-1-b,"? 1 /)tE-ve-L,cfMe-M1 L&JC,1,-/ , • , 1 . ·11-3r, a $/J-f 4-/¢A~,Rr. "F6 (l... 4x I 'l. /JE'-GD ---Ni) ·op B~t..,7. . ::2, / 3~r-l2r;<./.. 33 .,. 3. 17 '?) ~ t../ ;<. I 7. UJ??U"'JA-. ~ -/ 11 (P A-' I" Fo~ No • ,:, ;!..rtl-o .,>< (/. ;,<./, 3 ,l .,<. /. 7-(f' ,,,_ /1~ •7 J I<.. .. f=ol'Z... c.,,v<..., 4/P.><-l.~J~ :=. 7,2,/.t..... · >oft-,,, I . I -::-( 2., b ;( l ~ O I -J..-(./ 2-) f (_ / 6, 7 f;{ + 'J. 1.,f"" ) / 6, 1-! )(. 3 7' ~ Z- 4' 3, t-/<. ; /V" {2-,,-,r-,::.. ¥ 5 ,S I { I u -::: 1.-s---t *"1 < ,p,; I{ --- f c./-. 7'J /, / S) ~ 7 7 .,_ {2,l,;,:/~r:,,<,_J2..) + ( ;1:,.7r/-z..fJ.1rr-)?<t6.i.-t"/.2-:;'..Lf-7-+ . 16 i.-~ I<: (l{o,1f-/2.-fJ.1.-':)x.J1-'I .~·-'-1-·("--:2:f:, .,(.1-i-,,."'"'):::. 4-0,0 b.orlo ?.,2. ( I.) 1/;,. 11 5-r~c1c.r_ :C. ft,ywoo o SH7' 6i ( 51/J ~ J v-1/ '--~ .J (3.N, 4-r; E-. N -~ ,, >. i >t OJ2)Z.. ~ ~ -i;_t-~fi ,f, 1-J • I .l-,. ; v...," g.,-J. ,,_ fi.-/J .. (4(' i li ". --FtL._\i.:Z.,_. ·' .,--.-I I '? d'~·-~ l 4-o ~Ii ' --------! ~.~------. ---------· - I t --.---~-- i . ~-· i ' t::-' 0 ' " " i ; \ J : :: ( ... { I .. . --···r .. ... . . .. ~ ' -. -· -~ , I · ! .. C./.i_(;;lc. IC-.. 1Je::_y_yL'f.G_ ..P_f(:f/yjc1._~--------------~-_ N' -; . J t,, ,;-8 1.. -,f'Pt, i.-/: t ~"' I .1}-._ '!>Z,rl -• ~6 ,..J1.-t_2-.,._ JI, I 4,. "f-o ffd"'P IM-.. 1'-/,/ J"y:;· f A-n: N G-1 <.,E p p(j.J.>-~ / .. Ci6 I::. l. ~I.,~ \..I A-'--~ ( I( ,f 16/4}·7f-:x, 1 0 /c..-', f-lsA·'0. @ fu/2,lArJ· •fvlvG C? ~~",,_c·~ t1/ 4 l,f!, : . vJA-LA.-;_·-(-/6,J!"f J.1-s-) 81. r;( 1 3 :::.-Jo r ·:/fr{;::, ~ <) #I, v i-t !'I c @_ v?-,1<l}<1,,o(v ::-~-0> {f'· 1f'-::: 1 .. ,)t;i, ~ 3 g I -:#-1"' c:::. '</ ;,,,r v, -··· <:>/C. I (I , c H c.c..7 s-.r '/ ft ,1vc;e3 : 41 <-,fs s f''--1 e;..,c_% I /a..OtR ~ /7. J z }( > ( -. ----;· -· ... ---t.1ii ·-cf) _ _; ___ :-~----i ------7-· --···------··· . '. .. _ : .... Ii _. . v'f:.~O-~~)( ~//~ :·~ i:.6/-~: : --1,- 1 =-3 .. 6, / .1,t-r ~ /a(?r,7 ;,<1.4" ) f· , . l ....... ,b '. , ' .. -····f vse-c)c-10-e~~b-;:~~~~;,,~PH/t-e-CM i,J-µ-1;-.., .\ ! i ' ' l f \ L-- I ( ' . vtl?4ett-s0f(0Jt.1tr-il -t-! {Jerl.tJ ~ [vff" rz--r } . f"l¼T .·. c--ryp. ./ 5 f,4-C,IJi 't -:.· (4-_Ju )(_ /, l.J :,. 1 1 4ss- . I ~/ 9 . #1~'7i fi;/2. ·.· 5/l'cfo -/, 3 I f,4'/\ jC.r,,J,/,z_-fi,:x_7 . C Mil,/, ~"-<fJ.) . $fA-a t,-.J', ::::. 3 O.>D /t::1.:f-J' :=... &~7 ~ _3,-z=,.'~ ;4.B. rt 48"cJ, C. I.N f. ;,c... {;, {A?(Jtf?/t-. 3/S' 14> x J I q C M It,/ 1 s-M:. ,) ,#tc...71 f::..ev,~,8<.JUJ e'/8 1 0.c ' IN. ix 6.Let?4t~ i;/ /7k/J l!...-C. • ® ,@, @ · /JvG-To fJ_ fM-T1.., f\ N Pr<.-<.-y $~1p--nC. r:,l'LvC- kvt_ P ,s-r:11--1 1s '-lie T<) \"A-1J t..'-'\.,... @ 1 f3t?c.4u s pA-# 1v1,.. M .. rt ..... -C'-(2.,1 Ct , I? V ~ 3 /, 41.Y-· f '1.3.s-!L-· µ... , V v.. ,,_ -~ S. 71-)(.. -,;:--77, o/ I.fr---c1?S~./f'.l..1 Oco) /?Jr:;< ,~,</'LX. '3?( 7 ~ 'lt1t .( 2ffL:.1 r fr,• I? c..1 r :,, 2 .r-::rc._ -w--4 •I ~ ~f-½2/(,' --tt-e 12-o-<-- \> olt..t . . . .,: / µ... =-;11/,r r upv1 F-j·~-(t"'o/b , 6 -17.I. ~)/I CJ-1 = 3o.H, , __ .4-J ~Jo,~' 7<-t.c.,c/ °r,r..~.o = •7'i? '-. ( !. ;- ! . ___ $7 o I H 1 {-'; .......... ----· ' ' l ! ____ . ___ _ V v\. ~ 3, '1-1 X l O f (,_'1"2-}(/0 ) /,_,_ =:. '3 Cf le:_ 11t' v ,;. 's ~:;(I 9c:> o/, 0.>:;<.._ ?. b ')<. 2--b =-Cf 2 €, <:::: 2..ff• ,~ 8 °! (S ;' <Z.J-t G-C Ir-N ~Ci P,--rt v& M , ..,..-----. - (_ ( -i i - l 1 . --l-C..-~- i 1 j ---We?-.1~_,,(_-~-7, ,< 1.--,-s ;<. /'4-~ I .r-7,[ 'L-1 /fi:,, /vfu ~ /,.r-?_r,/-/o /t, .,_ 78,1S '\, 4 '-7g.11:?Z_ /'2--;,<1coc./~9,< 3&,J<."?.--6 = 'f3 /4 -:.. ,/)Oo7 S-.?( /,? 3 X '3 b.1'--½ · =-, 9 ') 6 3-.:#-(;, er f ~ A-s~ /.'J..,__ /?,{.,( ::-( 't_ 'f ;( /'2,X/0 c.o /, q ;< 16;,< ?//-;,.,:../ob, J. /1-s ?--. • o " 1 f _? "7--f, n x 3 6 x ¼ ~ 2. 1 · #" ___ 4,. ; 7 -/J•J,' . ' ' --·-____ ...,. -----------·--------· ( ':. -.·· CFJL-r----J GJ { . (" ;.. . r' .f'~· ,,, :rl, ..)·_~' ~ v ').-1 b:1}'- ,JO II I . . r~" ~ Lt N ,;..@_ (!, y f Ne; fw"--c .. :rr ~,-J 5 t/<cfr11.-l;J f M}-Jl.Y'L 1 ~ o If.--1 I I I pAN~ T,4-lc...c'· '~'1 Sb "' of-~~s1-u... pok--c..G-•. .. ~~.., ~_(<o,-,,rc,~x 7 t z :f.?.,~).....: b.7~.xt-,.r. l 1 (~ ::. -Z ,'1..,r;,<_/ • ~ /G ~. i -... __: •:..:o:--..,--- iv o Hov/?ovJ/v /2-&-c.'o/ .... ---- ? A*-' 6-t. Q L.-/N IS-@ V :J.-¥ 3, .r tc_ · 41.r/4-~ ~ D .~, f_.lNb't..• 'ITTB h ,' It, LC-~ l, I I 11 br I' -; I @ -f-'1-(_: @. ~hT IA (< -:. u~ ·½ t2 '1_" . ,l'f Io, B ,,s-/c.... ~ k'p 7 ,Q'/,.f / , S"f-L 1}~ ,~-z-.r ;, I 'f 4o I . '{ ir-:= ..L.. -+ ~ •S'S-'-: q.,o Lf_ b I Jc.. <~ < __ 'l.~-?-N.7 /?S'!' ;_... ( , . , ~ • 2-1 f . i ,,_ '*-Y-'J. . YI .. I-·-·-·-------;-·---·-·-··-. :-·· ··----·--;---·------· _--.. ··---··-···-.. ,;~. /S--;-A-~i2i£.i.~;.._ .. l -·< t i rrl,;(1 Pt'-' t- : • 1 •• • '1· ·--· -t · · · ; -· +-· · ! · · ' .. ' ' l l '. ! I ; .. _,-•• ' • t . -,. ···, ·, . j . . j!.. -• j . . -1 ' -·, ... . t • . . ' .I-. i • t f • , 1 i : i .. ! --~ .. ( j .·. ~----: ' --r ·-------. -~·-·-------- . . . . ~ . Jc.-','. . _,___l)F::tf .0 -----_: L . -.. 1 · ---.. -'. . /7 ½ ; I'-? . .. . ~,~ 81~· 2-Y . : ___ --__ (JJ_ _..--'_ ·-/.2 . I l/?b S' I (3) I & ' .. ! ' @ : fl'PJ/Yl.,. @ : 4 o )( , 'I l~ q_7"<> v(A r,.(ll+ ,:,7) 1--:-. 1s--:'Jq;1~ 1't1 .,_ "J~. 'l~ ,<100.s/, fiKI 2-7'./0-;<. 8 ;< 6 -::. 7 2-< # ' ' ' . ' OJ~ -:. . (J;)OJ(, z_ -(c, K~ I --' ·----· ' j 1'. - ' . l . l ..,. ?.,ffl. ---;:;,t-rt. 7 -z_ It h ~---;, / 1 .. -~--·------i ! .,.. . .. ! --,----·-· ' --_i . . ----i __ •.• '.! • --f ~ ·! ' ". J. ( I I --$-uf'-/5GA-HN4 j'f!~Pt//4f J..f-nu -/$-.J . --_IB; - • {c. V 4 ~ 4 1 C I -0 13 ) ~ 4. ' b . ·-,,,... .3 7..>"\) PJF >7 ·t ~ 2,(/' w/ I---tt S£. C,oJVr. Q -r '¥ t1. I 7,,5 ~ ....... l'.,(6 6 / ~-r-¥, 11.,<_ ~ ~ !; 7 ,c_ -z_/f'c_ -:.:: g Cf' CA.--;.. 1-0 8 . ,z.,,/ I 1/£- ~v. --L-/-_ 3 ( ( ,otJ) i, ~ 2\.r it-u ~ --z ( r-1 )( / o o o / 1 >< t i--'Q 1.. --a:?. r- /+-r-:;.. , Oi:>o 'fr:,(. /.J 1 :J'-../ Z-7' 3. ~8 :=... , 3 o7 . J-1fr-,r etJ--w;_y ~ ---- Fo~TLfi< ~~ 14tt cp. f~/4'1; C...0/4JC., G<i(...... f J Ct$ ) 1, ) t. J (, C 5-0 -/3--.:, >(1...-6 /)li?J L \ ~/.}Jc; vf . 'J--# 4 eA-, wkf ~-·----·-....... -~ -----·---· ·- .I I I I I I I ,:j I.I (ll) ! September 19, 1977 218-3, 1822 ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES Consulting Soil. Foundotion & Geological Engineers Palomar Airport Business Park 6231 Yarrow Drive, Suite C Carlsbad, California 92008 Att~ntion: Mr. Bernard W ~ Gilm9re Re: Geotechnical Investigation Palomar Airport Business ·Park -Phase II Carlsbad, California · Gentlemen: -~ 10/2-~ /s1 In accordance with your request, we have performed a detailed geotechnical investi- gation for the subject project. The accompanying report presents the results of our field investigation, laboratory tests, and engineering analysis. The soil and foundation conditions are discussed and recommendations for the geotechnical engineering aspects of the project are presente9. If you have any questions concerning our findings, please call. Very truly yours, ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES /7 /: . .JL 1()·' . --:::t· ,14 Y:Jf ,0, /=----ci._. l.:..c:" Robert Prater, C ;E. RP:jsr cc: Addressee (4) Willdon Associates, Attn: Mr. Henry Worley (2) ----.....___ ~He oto l'olle~e--1-0.~.,..S~. Colilorn10 9212.l,· (714) 453-~5 ~) l ,, •"1 . ~ J. I I J I I I I I J l l l l ] l ] l ,~ ·., GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION For PALOMAR AIRPORT BUS !NESS PARK -PHASE II Carlsbad,_ California To PALOMAR AIRPORT BUSINESS PARK 6231 Yarrow Drive, Suite C Carlsbad; California . September 1.977 ', ;?) • Letter of Transmittal Title Page Table of ·Contents INTRODUCTION :SCOPE SITE CONDITIONS A. · Surface B. Subsurface C. Groundwater D. · Seismicity TABLE OF CONTENTS 'CONCLUSIONS-AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. Earthwork · l. Clearing and Stripping ·2. . Preparation for Filling 3. Excavation 4. Materials for Fil I 5. Expansive Soils 6. Slopes 7. Compaction 8. Trench Backfi 11 9. Drainage 10~ ·Construction Observation B. Foundations 1. Footings · 2. Reinforced Concrete Box Culvert 3. Slabs-on-Grade · 4.~ Lateral Loads C. , Pavements Figure 1 -Site Plan , Figure 2 : Recommendations for Fi !ling on Sloping Ground APPEND.IX A -FIELD INVESTIGATION Figure A-1 -Key to Exploratory Test Pit Logs Expl~ratory Test Pit Logs 1 through 14 APPENDIX B -LABORATORY TESTING Figures s·-1 and B-2 -Plasticity Chart and Data Figure B-3 -Gradation Test Data Figures B-4 and B-5 -Compaction Test Results . Figures B-6 and B-7 -Direct Shear Test Data APPENDIX C -GUIDE SPECIFICATIONS -SITE EARTHWORK Page No. 1 1 1 ·1 2 2 3 3 4 4 .4 4 4 5 5 6 6 6 7 7 7 8 8 8 ·9 ·A-1 B-1 C-1 J \, • "'!) • l l l· l l l [J [) [J [) ] l l l ] l ] ] ,/ ' INTRODUCTIQN GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR PALOMAR AIRPORT BUSINESS PARK -PHASE II CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA In this report·we present the results of our geotechnicol investigation for the Phase II portion of the 330-ocre Palomar Airport Business Park located on the south side of Palomar Airport Rood opposite Palomar Airport in Carlsbad, California. Our predeces- sor firm previously performed detailed geotechnical investigations for the existing ·Phase ·1 portion of the business park and for the·PT&T improvements along the alignment of Camino Vida Roble within the Phase II portion of the pork. Our predecessor firm also . provided earthwork observation and testing services in connection with these projects. Th~ purpose of this inve_~tigation was to ,evaluate in detoi I the subsurface conditions at the:·site and to provide recommendations' concerning the geotec·hnical engineering aspects of the Phase II development. · · It is our understanding that the Phase II portion of the business pork will most likely be developed in one and two-story concrete ti lt-:up structures with slab-on-grade floors similar to those already constructed in the Phase I portion of the park. Extensive earthwork will be required to attain the qesign finish site grades. Cuts of up to about 40 feet and Hlls of up to about 50 feet are presently planned. The lots wi II ·probably not be finish graded during the initial earthwork operations; large areas encompassing several lots will be graded smoothly for drainage_ to within about plus or minus 2 feet qf the anticipated finish lot grades. Finish grading of lots to s~tisfy the specific needs of a given building and parking area will be undertaken.as individual l"ots are developed. As indicated on the improvement plans for Camino Vida Roble prepared by Rick Engineering Company, a reinforced~concrete box culvert will be constructed beneath Camino Vida Roble at the approximate location indicated on the Site Plan, Figure l. SCOPE Th~ scope of work performed for this inv_esHgation included a site reconnaissanc~, sub- surfo_ce exploration, laboratory testing, ;engineering analysis of the field and laboratory dot.a; and the preparation of this report~ The dote obtained and the analyses performed were for the purpose of providing design and construction criteria for the required site ~orthwork, building foundations and slo~-on-grcide construction. SITE CONDITIONS · A. ·. Surface The Phase II portion of ·the site is irregular in shape and bounded_ by Palomar Airport Road to the northwest, an S. D.G. & E. ri-ght-of-way to the southwest, and by the Phase I por- l ... i'., I. I I I ' ) I J. I I I I J J ""!1 .14 J JJ I 218-3 Page 2· tion of the business park to the east. The terrain is generally moderately rolling with ground surface elevations ranging from a low of :about el. 170 at the western extremity of the site to a high of about el. 310 in the nort-heast portion of the site adjacent to Palomar Airport Road. Surface vegetation generally consists of a moderate t~ heavy growth of brush and chaparral. A few trees are present in the lower lying areas. A large stockpile of topsoil from the Phase I grading operation is present on the south side of Camino Vida Roble in the southeast portion of the Phase II development area. B. Subsurface A subsurface investigation was perf9rmed at the site on August 22, 1977 using a Case 580B backhoe. Fourteen exploratory test pits were excavated to a maximum depth of 14 feet at the approximate locations shown on the Site· Plan, Figure 1. Logs of the test pits and details regarding the field investigation are presented in ApP.endix A. Details of the , laboratory test'ing and the laboratory test results are presented in Appendix B. It should be pointed out that the elevations referred to on the test pit 1095: are only approximate and were roughly estimated utilizing the ground surface contours shown ori the preliminary grading p!an provided by Willdon Associates. The soils encountered in the exploratory test pits consisted pre.dominantly of residual surface soils, colluviol soils and formational sedimentary soils. Residual surface soils, generally less than 2 feet thick and ranging in composition from silty sand to potentially expansive sandy clay, were encountered on ridges and hillsides at the upper elevations overlying the formational soils. The formational soils encountered over the majority of the site · consisted of sandstones and siltstones. Due to the denseness and cementation of some of the formational materials encountered, refusal to penetration was met in exploratory backhoe · · Test Pits 3 and 14 at depths of 5. 0 and _5 .5 feet, r~spectively. Most of the proposed cuts wil I be in formotionol soi Is whi.ch possess good strength characteristics with regard to s.lope stability. The sandstone formational soiis are non-expansive and of good pavement subgrade qua I ity. Colluvial_ soi.ls consisting of loose to medium dense silty sands were encountered to a depth of about 6.S feet in Test Pit 9 which was located near the bottom of a ravine. The soils en.countered in Test Pit' 12 located in the low lying area of the southeastern portion of the sit~ consis_ted of about 4 feet of loose san'dy and clayey si_lts overlying very stiff to hard silty clay which possesses a high potential for expansion •. The test pit logs and related information depict subsurface conditions only at the specific locations-shown on the site plan and on the particular dote designated on the logs; Sub- surface conditions at .other locations may differ from conditions occurring at these test pit locations. Also, the passage of time may result in a change in the subsurface conditions due to environmental changes. C. · Groundwater · Free groundwater was not encountered in any of the exploratory test pits excavated _at· the site and no groundwater seepages were observed. It must be noted, however, that I I I i -( i 1-.I·· f • 2l8-3 Page 3 fluctuations in the level of groundwater may occur due to variations in surface topography, subsurface stratification, .rainfall and other possible factors which may not have been evident at the time of our field investigation. D. Seismic.Hy Based on our reconnaissance and review of available published information, there are no active faults known to exist at the site and the nearest known major active faults are the Elsinore and San Jacinto Fault Zones located approximately 24 and 46 miles: northeast of the site, respectively. Although research on earthquake prediction has greatly increased in recent years, seis- mologists have not yet reached the point where they can predict when and where an earthquake "-'.ill occur. Nevertheless, on the basi·s of current technology, it is reasonable - to assume tha"t the proposed structures will be subject to at l~ost· one moderate earthquake during their design lives. During such an earthquake, the. danger from fault offset -through the site is remote but strong shaking of the site. is likely to occur. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS From a soil o_nd foundation engineering standpoint, the site is suitable for construction of the proposed Phase II portion of the business park providing the conclusions and recommen- dations of this report are incorporated into the design and construction of the project. The primary feature of concern at the site is the moderate to high expansion potential of some of the more clayey soils encountered in the exploratory test pits. We don'l anticipate, however, that expansive soils will be encountered to any significant degree on the higher lots comprising the northern portion of the site. Substantial quantities of expansive soils are most likely to be exposed over large areas in the cuts comprising the lower-lying lots bordering the north side of Camino Vida Roble. Where expansive soils are exposed at or near the finish subgrade level of building pads, the proposed buildings and slabs-on-grade could be subject to damage due to heave of the expansiv~ materials. Therefore, on -those building pads where such a condition exists, it wiJ.1 be necessary to 1) extend the bui I ding foundations somewhat deeper than, would normally be required, and 2) provide a mat of non-expansive fill beneath all slabs-on- grode. In order to minimize the necessity of spec,ial design features and problems associated wrth expansive materials in fill ar·eas, '.the site grading work should be planned and carried out so as to assure that all fills ore copped with a layer of non-expansive sandstone fill. In cut areas where the natural sub'grade is comprised of expansive soils,· it will be necessary to overe~cavate the expansive soils within building areas and replace_ them with non-expansive sandstone fi 11. Wi.th regard to pavements, substantially thicker pavement sections will be required where_ clayey soils are exposed at or near the finish subgrode surface than will be .required in those areas where sandstone (naturaf or as fi 11). is present. ' • ,\.l .• 218-3 · · Page 4 A. Earthwork 1. Clearing and Stripping All areas to be graded should be cleared of debris, brush, chaparral, designated trees,_ and associated roots. The cleared materials should be disposed of off-site. Any grading planned for the area presently occupied by the t"opsoil stockpile on the _south side of Col"!)ino Vida Roble in the southeast portion of fhe si.t~ will require that the stockpile first be relocated. After clearing, any cultivated areas as well as all other areas supporting a growth of surface grass arid weeds should be stripped to a sufficient depth to remove all surface vegetation. Over much of the site little or no surface vegetation other than heavy brush and chaparral -is present. In these areas, stripping will not be required assuming that the dearing operation aGcotnplishes removal of the brush and chap~rral • . 2. Preparati_on for Filling After the site has been cleared, stripped, and prior to p'lacing fill; the exposed subgrode soils should be scarified to a depth of 6 inches, moisture conditioned, and compacted to the requirements for structural fi II. in general, the surface soils in ravines and draws ore loose to depths of only several inches and .as a result, the normal scarification and recom- paction process should be adequate to effectively stabilize these soils. However, based on our experience in connection with the moss grading operations for the adjacent Phase I portion of the business pork, we anticipate that isolated pockets of loose, saturated colluvial soils will likely be e~posed during the Phase II site grading work. The necessity for remov- ing and recompc.icting those .isolated poc;;kets __ should be determined by the soil engineer in the field during construction. ' · Fills constructed on natural slopes having an inc_lination steeper than 5 horizontal to 1 vertical shou·ld be keyed and benched into firm natural ground below any loose surface soils as illustrated on Figure 2. 3. Excavation . - Based on the results of our exp_loratory test pits, and our experiences with similar materials, it is our opinion that the on-site soils and formationol mqteriols con be excavated utilizing ordinary heavy earthmoving equipment •. Some heavy ripping could~ however, be required in the deeper c_ut areas of the site where layers of cemented formationol materials may be encountered. · 4. · Materials for Fill All existing on-site soils ore in general suitable for reuse as fill. Fill material should not', howevet, contain rocks or lumps larger than 6 inches in greatest dimension with ·not more · ) ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ., . 218-3 Page 5 than 15 percent larger than 2.5 inches. Toe use of potentially expansive soil as fill ·should conform to the· reguirements of Item A.5., 11 Expansive Soils. 11 All material for use as fill should be subject to approval by the soil engineer's field representative. The existing 'topsoil stockpile located in the southeast portion of the site may be reused as fill in the lower portions of the deeper site fills. However, any concentrations of organic material should be .selectively removed and disposed of off-site. The method of placement and suitability of the materials should be supject to the soil engineer:'s approval. 5. Expansive Soi ls Pot.entially expansive soi Is taken from the required site excavations should be used as fi II only up to within 2 feet of the design finish grades in street pavement areas and on lots; -the upper 2 feet of fill should be comprised of no~-expan~ive_ sandy fill material. The determination as to which materials ore expansive and whi.ch are not should be made in the field during construction by the soil engineer's representative. Based on. the~I imited information provided by our field exploration work,· it would at this stage be impossible to predict the actual conditions that will _exist on each and every building lot (in cut) at the proposed design finish grades. A more accurate determination of the expansive soil conditions on individual lots in cut con be made subseguent to the rough site grading work. Prior to.constructing buildings, however, each individual building lot should be evaluated in order to. accurately determine the extent and severity of any expansive soils that may be present at or near the finish lot grades. 6. Slopes Based on the results of our exploratory test pits, laboratory te~ts, and stability analyses, it is our opinion that the proposed cut slopes and fill slopes up to 50 feet·in height will be safe against moss instability if constructed to on inclination no steeper than 1.5 horizontal to l vertical·~ . It is essential that the soil engineer's representative inspect the materials exposed in the proposed cuts during the excavation work to check for any signs of potentially ·unstable areas and to verify that the materials encountered throughout the excavations correspond to· those anticipated from our exploratory test pits. Fill slopes should be constructed so as to assure th9t a minimum degree of compaction of 90 percent is attained to within 18 inches of the fi'.nished slope face and that a minimum degree of compaction of 85 percent is attained in the outer 18 inches. This may be accomplished by 11 backrolling11 with a sheepsfoot roller or other suitable equipment in 5 to 8 foot vertical increments as the fill is .raised. Placement of fill near the tops of slopes. should be carried out in such a ·manner as to assure that loose, uncompacted soils are not sloughed over the tops and allowed to accumulate on the slope face. The on-site sandy soils and formational sandstones will be 9uite susceptible to erosion where exposed.on slopes. Therefore, the projec;:t plans and specifications shou~d contain I I I I I I I I I I I J I 1,t • ' 218-3 Page 6 all necessary features and construction requirements to prevent erosion of the slopes both during and after construction. Slopes and other exposed gr:Ound ·surfaces should be appro- priately planted with a protective ground cover. It should be the grading contractor's obligation to take all measures deemed necessary during grading to provide erosion control devices in order t_o protect slope areas and adja- cent properties from storm d~mage and flood hazard originating on this project. It should be made tne contractor's responsibility to maintain slopes in-their as-graded form until · all slopes are in satisfactory compliance with the job specifications, all berms have been properly constructed, and all associated drainage devices m~et the requirements of the civi I engineer. 7. Compaction All structural _fill should be compacted to a minimum degree of compaction of 90 percent based upon ASTM Test Designation D1557-70. The upper 6 inches of subgrcide soils beneath pav~ments should be compacted to a minimvm degree of compaction of 95 percent. Fi II material should be spr.ead and compacted in uniform hoi-izontal:Jjfts not exceeding 8 inches in uncompacted thick~ess. · · Based on the results of the laboratory tests We estimate that the on-site form.9tional materials wil I undergo no shrinkage due to compaction and may in fact resul"t in an overal I increase in volume in the compacted state relative to the natural in-place density. However, due to the presence of residual surface soils and colluvial soils which may be subject to · significant--shrinkage upon compaction, we feel that an over-all average shrinkage factor of_ between -3 and +3 percent would be reasonable for planning purposes. 8. Trench Backfi II Pipeline trenches should be backfilled with compacted fill. Backfill material should be placed in lift thicknesses appropriate to the type of compaction equipment utilized and compacted to a minimum degree of compaction of 85 percent by mechanical means. In all slab-on-grade and pavement areas, the upper portion of the backfill t9 a depth equal to 1.5 tim~s the trench width, but not less than 3 feet, should be compacted to a minimum degree of compaction of 90 percent. In pavement areas, that portion of the trench backfill within the pavement section should conform to the material and compaction requirements of the adjacent pavement section. 9. Drainage Positive surface gradients should be prov·ided adjacent to buildings so as to direct surface water aw_ay from foundations and slabs toward suitable discharge facilities. Ponding of surface water should not be allowed adjacent to structures or on pavements. I· I I r I I 1 O. Construction Observation 218-3 Page 7 Variations in soil conditions are possible and may be encountered during construction. fn order to permit corr~lation between the preliminary soil data and the actual soil conditions encountered during construc_tion, and so to assure conformance with the plans one! specifications as originally contemplated, it is essential that the soil engineer be retained to perform on-site review during the course of construction. All earthwork should b:e performed under the observation of the soil engineer's representa- tive to assure proper site preparation, selection of satisfactory fill materials, as well as placement and compaction of the fills. _Sufficient notification prior to earthwork operations is essential to make certain that the work will be properly observed. All earthwork should he performed in accordance with the Guide Earthwork Specifications presented in Appendix C. It should be pointed o~t, however, that the guide specifications are only gen~rol in nature and the actual job specifications should also incorporate all requirements contained in the text of this report; B. Foundations The foundation requirements for individual buildings on specific lots will vary depending upon the type of materials actually comprising the finish subgrade of the building pad. As j·ndividuol lots ore finish graded, the soil engineer should determine the foundation require- ments based on his evaluation of the actual subsurface conditions within the area of the proposed building constr.uction. 1. Footings The pro.posed buildings may be supported on conventional continuous and/or individual spread footings. Where non-expansive materials are exposed at the finish subgrade surface to a depth of at least 2 feet, footings should be founded at least 16 inches below the lowest adjacent finished-grade or 12 inches below rough pad grade, whichever is deeper. Where .expansive materials are present at or within 2 feet of the finish subgrade surface, footings should be· founded at least 24.inches below the lowest adjacent finished grade or 20 iriches below rough ·pad grade, whichever is deeper. tn· cut areas where footings will be founded in ~ndistyrbed f9rmotional materials, they may be designed for allowable bearing pressures of 4,000 pounds per square foot (psf) for dead loads, 5,000 psf for combined dead and live loads, and 6,500 psf for all loads including wind or seismic. In areas where footings will be founded in compacted fill and/or natural soils, they should be designed for allowable bearing pressures of 2,500 psf for dead loads, 3,500 psf for combined dead and live loads, and 4,500 psf for all loads including wind or seismic. All footings should, however, have a minimum width of 12 inches. Footings located adjacent to the tops of either cut or fill slopes should be founded at sufficient depth so as to·provide at least 5 feet of horizontal cover between the footing and the slope face at thf= footing bearing-level. l. "'? p ~, -· 1 ' J J J J l l l l 1 i LI [1 [J j :.1 'l i ; . l ! "f 218-3 Page 8 All c-ontinuous footing~ shou_ld be reinforced with top and bottom reinforcement to provide structural continuity and to permit spanning of local irregularities. To assure that footings are founded in material of adequate bearing capacity; it is essential that the -soil engineer inspect the footing excavations prior to placing reinforcing steel or concrete. 2. Reinforced Concrete B_ox Culvert A reinforced concrete box culvert will be constructed qeneath Camino Vida Roble at the · appr~ximate location indicated on the Site Plan, Figure l.. Based on· our evaluation of the soils in the general vicinity of the proposed culvert, we anticipate that the foundation soils will be suitable for the direct support of the culvert. We estimate that any settlements resulting from the weight of the culvert and overlying.fill loads will be negligible. 3. Slabs-on-Grade We recommend that ali building floor slabs as well as exterior concre,te slabs-on-grade be supported on .a 24-inch minimum thickness of non-expansive soil. On those lots where· expansive soils 9re present within a 24-inch depth of the finish subgr:ade surface, we .. recommend that the subgrade soils wi_thin the building area·be removed and replaced with. non-expansive fi II to a minimum depth of 24 inches. In buildings of. relatively large areal extent, the required thickness of non-expansive fill within the building area may be reduced to 12 inches at a distance of 25 feet from the perimeter footing of the bui I ding. Slab reinforcing should be provide~ in accor:dance with the anticipated use and loading of the slab. As a minimum, however, we recommend that the slabs be reinforced with 6x6-10/10 wire mesh for control of shrinkage cracks. In ar~as where moisture-sensitive floor coverings are fo be utilized and in other areas where floor dampness would be undesirable, we recommend that consideration be given to providing an impermeable membrane beneath the slabs. The membrane should be covered with 2 inches of sand to protect it during construction. The sand should be lightly moistened just prior to pla7i"ng the concrete. 4. Lateral Loads Lateral load resistance for building foundations may be developed in-friction between the· . foundation botto'ms and the supporting subgrade. An al-lowable frictfon coefficient of 0.30 is considered applicable. An additional allowable passive resistance equal to an equival~rit fluid weighing 300 pounds per cubic foot acting against the foundations may be used i"n design provided the footings are poured neat against undisturbed soil. For footings founded in undisturbed formational material, an allowable friction coefficient of 0.35 and a passive resistance of 2,000 pounds per square foot are applicable • . jl. ,a., . l. l l l l l l l [J ] :11 ~ (J C. Pavements 218-3 Page 9 Based on our past experience in connection with the construction of the Phos~ I portion of the business pork, we anticipate that R-values of about 10 and 40 will be typical for the on-site expansive clayey soils and the better quality sandy soils, respectively. For comparison and preliminary planning purposes, we have developed the following typical pavement sections using Procedure 301-F of the State of California Department of Public Works, Division of Highways. Pavement sections are presented for traffic indices of 3.5, 5.0 and 7.5. The 3.5 index is considered to be a reasonable value for outdmobile parking areas and the 5. 0 index reasonable for parking areas and a~cess driveways which are subjected to light truck traffic. A traffic index of 7.5 was required by the City of Car.lsbad for Camino Vida Roble in the Phase I portion of the business park. Subgrode. Materia:I Type SANDY SOILS CLAYEY SOILS TYPICAL PAVEMENT SECTIONS Pavement Components Design Asphalt Traffic Design Concrete Aggregate Bose Index R-Value (Inches) Class 2 (Inches) 3.5 40 2.0 4.0 5.0 40 2.5 5.0 7.5 40 4.0 8.5 3.5 10 2.0 6.5 5.0 10 2.5 10.0 7.5 10 4.0 16.5 Total Thickness (Inches) 6.0 7.5 12.5 8.5 12.5 20.5 Note: The pavement sections given above for the sandy subgrade soil would be applic_able to clayey subgrade areas provided that 12 inches of sandy fill soil overlies clayey soil • t \?'~ .... ( __ >,: ~ . The above pavement sections ore for general inform.ation only and represent the approximat~· extremes in pav.ement requirements onticipafed at the site based on the quality of the sub-' grade materials. Pavement designs should be performed for individual lots based on the actual material type(s) comprising the subgrade anq the anticipated use of and vehicular loadings ori the pavements. Asphalt concrete, aggregate base, onp preparation of the subgrade should conform to and be placed in accordance with the California Division of Highways, ·standard Specifications, . January 1971 edition, .except that the 'test method for compaction should be determined by· ASTM D1557-70. . . I .. :1 .. J. I ) ) l l ' J ]. , l f1I i..JI ;ff_ LIU [J ra J1J L-EGEND 2 0 14 ~ 6 0 Approximate Scale (feet) 0 250 500 100 Indicates approximate location of exploratory test pit performed by Robert Prater Associates for Phase II investigation. Indicates approximate location of exploratory test pit performed by 'Lowney/Kaldveer Associates for PT & T alignment investigation. Indicates approxi~ate location of exploratory boring performed by : Lowney/Kaldveer Associates for Phase I investi_gation._ · Indicates approximate location of exploratory test pit performed by Lowney/Kaldveer Associates for Phase I investigation. 5 0 · Indicates approximate location of exploratory boring performed by Woodward-Gizrenski & Associates for preliminary investigation report dated June 18, 1973. Base: An undated, untitled to ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES Co~wlr,no So•I. foundor,cr. t Geolop,col fno,neers Wi I ldan Associates. SITE PLAN PALOMAR AIRPORT BUSINESS PARK -PHASE_ II Carlsbad, California PROJECT NO. DATE 218-3 September 1977 _ Figure 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I· I Existing ground surface Notes: Horizontal benches into firm ground Compacted Fill Toe Key ~ width to 7 be determined by Soil Engineer, but not less than 10 feet Toe Key - 2 ft. min. into firm ground Zone of I oose surface soil l) Fills to be keyed and benched as shown into· existing ground where the existing slopes are steeper than 5 horizontal to 1 vertical. 2) Finish_ed fill slope inclination to be no ; steeper than l .5 horizontal to 1 vertical · ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES Co~1d1,,g So./. foundo•,on l, G~olog,col fng,n~r,s SCHEMATIC ONLY NOT TO SCALE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FILLING ON SLOPING ·GROUND PALOMAR AIRPORT BUSINESS PARK -PHASE II Carlsbad, California PROJECT NO. DATE 218-3 Sept-ember 1977 Figure. 2 I . II'\~. . . . ., . . I I I I I I I I I I I I • ;J J I APPENDIX A FIELD INVESTIGATION A-1 The field investigation consisted of a surface reconnaissance and a subsurface exploration program using a Case 5808 ~ackhoe. Fourteen exploratory test pits were excavated at the site on: August 22, 1977 to a maximum depth of 14 feef at the approximate locations shown on the Site Plan, Figure l. The materials encountered fo the test pits were con- tinuously logged in the field by our soil engineer and described in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (ASTM D2487). The approximate elevations shown on the test pit logs were estimated from an undated preliminary grading plan provided by Willdon Associates • .The logs of the test pits as well as a key for soil classification are included as part of this appendix. Representative samples were obtained from the exploratory test· pi.ts at selecfed depths appropriate to the inyestigation. All samples were retl!rned to our laboratory for evalua- tio~ and appropriate testing. · The test pit logs show our interpretation of the subsurface conditions on the date and at 1 the locations indicated, and it is riot warranted that they are representative. of subsurface conditions at other locations and times. J I I .I I. I J I. ., ;;j 11 ~ 11 4 -. ~ ~ ~ l J J !'.I ~ " ... .. ' .. PRIMARY DIVISIDNS GROUP SECONDARY DIVISIONS . SYMBOL .GRAVELS CLEAN GW Well graded gravels. gravel-sand mixtures. little or no ...J GRAVELS fines. c:( MORE THAN HALF CLESS lHAN Poorly sraded gravels or gravel-sand mixtures, little or ~ ii: 0 GP Wo OF COARSE 5% FINES~ no fines. 5 ~N (/) ~ . FRACTION IS GRAVEL GM Silty gr_avels. gravel-sand-silt mixtures. non-plastic fines. 0 0 u. z w LARGER THAN WITH w Oz N FINES . GC Clayey gravels, gravel-sand-clay mixtures. plastic fines. z u. c:( in NO. 4 SIEVE ~ ...J :i: w CLEAN < I-~ SANDS SW Well graded sands. gravel(y sands. little or no fines. (!) :I: SANDS C: in -w zw MORE THAN HALF C LESS THAN·· < l.? SP Poorly graded sands or gravelly sands. little or no fir.es. (/) :I: C: 5% FINES) re t-< OF COARSE <{ ...J 8 w .FRACTION IS SANDS SM Silty sand_s, sand-silt mixtures. non-plastic fines. C: (/) o-SMALLER THAN WITH ~ NO. 4 SIEVE FINES SC Clayey sands. sand-clay mixtures. plastic fines; l.l.J SILTS AND CLAYS ML lnor~anic ·silts and very fine sands rock flour, silty or (/) N c ayey fine sands or clayey_ silts with slight plasticity. u. a: in _J ow 5 ...J CL lnorJanic clays of low to medium plasticity. gravelly ...J w LIQUID LIMIT IS (/) ~-< > cays, sandy clays, silty clays, lean clays. < :::'i: w LESS THAN 50% 0 :I: (/) in OL Organic silts and organic silty clays of low plasticity. w z z (/) 0 ~--<-0 Inorganic sjlts. miCijCeous Q( diatomaceous fine sandy or :c ...J N SILTS AND CLAYS MH t-~ d silty soils, elastic s_ilts. (!) . :w ffi z LIQUID l:IMIT IS CH Inorganic clays of high plasticity. fat clays. w §~ z z :::'i: :::'i: c:( GREATER THAN 50% u:: :i: . ' OH Organi9 clays of medium to high plasticity. organic silts. t-.. HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS Pt Peat and other highly organic soils. DEFINITION OF TERMS .. U.S. STANDARD SERIES SIEVE CLEAR SQUARE SIEVE OPENINGS 200 40 10 4 3/4" 311 12 11 SAND GRAVEL ' SILTS AND CLAYS I I I COARSE COBBLES BOULDERS FINE MEDIUM COARSE FINE : GRAIN S.IZES SANDS. GRAVELS AND BLOWS/FOOT t CLAYS AND STR.ENGTH* BLOWS/FOOT t NON-PLASTIC SILTS PLASTIC SILTS . VERY LOOSE 0 -4 VERY SOFT 0 -1/4 0 -2 ·. SOFT 1/4 -1/2 2 -4 : LOOSE 4 -10 t/2 FIRM -1 4 -8 MEOl!JM DENSE 10 -30 STIFF 1 -2 8 -16 DENSE 3:) -50 VERY STIFF 2 -, 4 16 -32 VERY DENSE 0/ER 50 HARO OVER 4 OVER 32 ' RELATIVE DENSITY CONSISTENCY _+Number of blows of 140 pound hammer falling· 30 inches to drive a 2 inch O.D. (1-3/8 inch I.OJ split spoon CASTM 0-1586). h.hconfined compressive strength in tons/sq. ft. as determined by laboratory testing or approximated by the standard penetration test (ASTM D-1586). pocket penetrometer. torvane, or visual observation. K~Y TO EXPLORATORY TEST PIT LOGS Unified Soil Classification System (ASTM D-2487) RO~ERT PRATER ASSOCIATES PALOMAR AIRPORT BUSINESS PARK -PHASE II Cc,nwlr.ng So,1. Foundor,on /. G'rolog,col fngmrr15 Carlsbad, California PROJECT NO. DATE Figure A-1 218-3 September 1977 J . .-. I. .1 I '.J 'J ·)·· t,':. ... I .] RIG Cose 58OB Backhoe SURFACE ELEVATION24O (approx.) LOGGED BY CRG DEPTH To' GROUNDWATER None. Test Pit excavated with 24 inch bucket on 8/?2/77 z..,~ ~ . UI 0 UI . DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION ~ut;: :rz . ~ ~ ~ a: a:: - DEPTH UI ... z...._ UJ I-er~-~ -..J <<Cl) 1-Z < z a:: IL ~ ~ ~ LL 0. :: :;; ;-: <"' ..., UJQ <I) Za:wCI> ::,; ..,-0 i;i a: ... ~-Co.a:~ DESCRIPTION AND REMARKS SYM-COLOR SOL . SOIL (FEET) ~~ CONSIST < z :3.., u::,; I- ·, TYPE "l 0 I->-~a:~ u C/l CD 2 0 Cl) =, u SILTY SAND (SANDSTONE) · SANDY and CLAYEY SILT (SILTSTONE) Bottom of Test Pit= 13.0 Feet Notes: 1) "x" denotes jar sample. 2) 11s 11 denotes sack sample. Note:. The 1trotiricotion fines represent Jhe. cpproxlmol• boundary between moleriol lype1 and the lronsition may bot produol. ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES Coruvlt,ng So,/, fo.,ndal,on l G~olog,col fng,n<:rfl gray gray - tan medium dense - dense very dense very dense grayish brown SM .... - .... 1 - -· - .... 2 -X 10 .... - -3 - .... . 4 -ML .... . .. -5- .... -.... 6 -s 17 .... - ,_ 7 -.... ._ .... 8 ·_ X 19 --.... 9 - ,_ - -10-X ... - .... 11 - -- .... 12 -..... - 13 .... - .... - .... ---... --.- .... - .... - ,_ - ,_ - .... - .... - I-- I-- EXPLORATORY TEST PIT LGG PALOMAR AIRPORT BUSINESS PARK -PHASE 11 Carlsbad, California . PROJECT NO. DATE TEST PIT NO. r--2-1_8 ___ 3 __ 4-S_e_p-te-m--'-b-e_r_l_9_77--1 1 I I I I I I I I . _ SU~FACE ELEVATION254·(approx.) LOGGED BY , 1------c-----:--:--:--'-'---r-:---::~.,...,-----:----:-~__J_-------_J DEPTH TO GROUN8WATER None . Test .Pit excavated with 24 inch bucket on 8/22/77 CRG RIG• Case 580B Backhoe . . er;::: k------------------r~r----..,-----.----l· DEPTH DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION SYM~ COLOR CON_SIST. SOIL (FEET) UJ :z 1-w ~~ 0 -0 DESCRIPTION AND R~MARKS BOL · TYPE SILTY SAND -SANDY SILT Sit TY SAND (SANDSTONE) Bottom of Test Pit = 14. 0 Feet · Notes: 1) 11x11 denotes jar sample.· 2) 11s11 denotes sack sample_. Nola: The llrotiOcation lines reprtHnl the cpproximote boundary between motcriol types and the troNilion moy · be Qroduof. ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIAtES Consufhng So,/; Foundot,on & Gro/00,co/ fng,nc,c,11 reddish medium brown dense yellow-dense ish tan light gray -very yellow:-dense ish tori SM -'--X 20 ML -1 - -SM '-2 - .... - '-3 - '-- .... 4 ·- .... ~5-s '-- '-6 - '-- ,_ 7 - ~ ..! ~ 8 - .... - ,_ 9 - '-- ..._10- ..... - '-11 - '-- '-12 -.... - .... 13 - ..... - 14 .... - ---' .... - ---- .... - .... - .... - .... -... -. .... --- EXPLORATORY TEST PIT LOG PALOMAR AIRPORT BUSINESS PARK -PHASE 11 Carlsbad, Californic;i . r-_P_R_O:-:-JE_C-:T:-N_0_. -lf-,---D_A_T __ -E:__ _ _..J TEST PIT NO; 218-3 September 1977 2 I " •\ .. I I I· I I I I I I I j ! RIG' Case 5808 Backhoe SURFACE ELEVATION 272(approx.) LOGGED BY CRG DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER None . Te~l Pit excavated with 24 inch bucket on 8/22/77 DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATiON DEP"J'.H (FEET) DESCRIPTION AND REMARKS CLAYEY SAND SANDY CLAY SILTY SAND '(SANDSTONE) SANDY.GRAVEL (CONGLOMERATE) Bottom of Test Pit= 5.0 Feet .(met refusal) Note: 1) ·"x11 denotes jar sample. Nola: The 1lrolific:ation IIM1 represent Iha approximate · bo....,dary between ,nolcriol type• and the lron1ition may le grocLal. SYM- BOL ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES Cor1ull,nQ So,I. Fovr.doi,on .&-G=log,col fnQ•nccfl COLOR brown brown tan tan CONSIST. SOIL TYPE , medium SC dense L - very CL I- stiff -I- 1 · X - 19 hard 2 - dense SM L.. - ~ 3 -X ~ very 4 -GP L.. X . dense 5 I-- '-- L - I-- I-- I-- -- I-- '-- ,__ -.... - -- '-- I----- -- '-- '-- -- '--- '-- L.. - '-- -- L.. -... - '--... -... - '--- EXPLORATORY TEST PIT LOG PALOMAR AIRPORT ·BUSINESS PARK -PHASE II Carlsbad, California t-_P_-R_OJ_. _E_CT_N_O_. --1---D_A_T_E __ ....J TEST PIT NO. 21-8-3 September 1977 3 l., :- ·- I ·1 I I I I I I I I I J ' ' J . . ' Case 58-0B Backhoe SURFACE ELEVATION 210(approx.) LOGGED BY CRG RIG DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER None Test Pit_ excavated with 24 inch bucket on 8/22/77 l----------------------r----r---,------r---DEPTH SOIL IFEETI DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION ·i1t COLOR DESCRIPTION AND REMARKS SILTY SAND (SANDSTONE) Bottom of Test Pit = 10. 0 Feet_ Note: 11x11 denotes jar sample. ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES Cor,.,lr,ng So,I. Fo11ndor,on I, GM>log,col fng,nrr,, light brown grayish tan light gray CONSIST. , TYPE medi-um SM dense dense - very dense .... - ... 1 - .... - .... 2 - .... - .... 3 - .... .... 4 - -,__ 5- .... - .... {) - I-- L.. 7 - I-' - I-8 -X 8 .... - I-9 - .... - 10 I-- .... - ,_ - .... -- .... - I-- .... - .... - L.. - 1---.... -... - ,.__ - .... - L.. - .... - .... -' .... - .... - >-- EXPLORATORY TEST PIT LOG PALOMAR AIRPORT BUSI NESS PARK -PHASE II Carlsbad, California PROJECT NO. DATE TEST PIT NO. 2l8-3 September 1977 4 I I I I I I I J ] l l l ] RIG. Case 58-0B Backhoe SURFACE ELEVATION 225(opprox.) LOGGED BY CRG DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER None T esf Pit _excavated with 24 inch bucket on 8/22/77 z uJ~ . w ow . w > :i: DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION a: 9ut;: :i:z DEPTH w I-z, a:;: a: ... ,,( z iii I-.., <<I/) Wz < c:>> ~ -"' C, ~ ti :t ~~ w z a: ... w z "' z a: w Q. ::i: :r wo ~ 0 Q. a: DESCRIPTION AND REMARKS SBYOML-COLOR CONSIST SOIL · TYPE (FEET) < w-o 3: z "' a: I- "' z t3 ...J 0 ti~ u :l: ... ~ crS u z O"' ::) u -SILTY SAND -SANDY SILT -SILTY SAND (SANDSTONE) Bottom of Test Pit= 9. 0 Feet Note: "x11 denotes jar sample. Noto: The 1lr01Hicolion lines repre,ent the opproxlrnot• bounclory between rnolcriol type, and the tron,ition rnoy be groclvol. ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES Con·,u11,np So,I. foundo•,on & G..olco,col fng,n~~" light brown gray - medium . SM- dense . ML ._ - 1 - dense SM .... - 2 - .... - 3 - ·- 4 ·--. -...... 5- -- -6 - .... -.... 7 - --X :9 -8 - -- 9 -- ---- ---- ---.,, -- -- -- ----- : -- >-- -- >-- >-- -- -- -.... - -- -- EXPLORATORY TEST PIT LOG · PALOMAR AIRPORT BUSINESS PARK -PHASE II Carlsbad, Colifor-nia t-_P_R-;OJ::-;--;:;EC:---T-;:;-N-'-0_. -f--::---D--=A_T_E __ ---1 T=EST PIT NO. 21-8-3 September 1977 5 ~ "' !:. ·---"·-------- I.~ _-' i,-' --R---1 G-----C-os_e_5-::-:8::-':0::-:8-B-::-a-c7k7h_o_e _________ ,-::S-:-:U-:R-:F'"'."A-:-C::-E-:E-:-L=Ev:--:-A-T_I_O_N--:2:-".4:-:0:--;(:--ap_p_r_o_x~:,-L-O_G_G_E_D_B_Y __ C_R_G __ _ Test Pit excavated with 24 inch bucket o-~--8/22/17 I I I I I I I I I I ' J 'J .1 ' l DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER None . . 1,.__...::.-----------------,--.----,--'-'--~--, DEPTH (FEET) DESCRIPTION AND-CLASSIFICATION SYM-COLOR SOL CONSIST. SOIL er -UJ ,_ I-z <w ~ ~ 0 ·U DESCRIPTION AND REMARKS SILTY SAND (SANDSTONE) Bottom of Test Pit= 9. 0 Feet Note: 11x11 denotes jar sample. ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES Coniulr,ng So,I. foundo1oon &-G~log,col-EnpiM;rrs light gray medium dense dense very dense TYPE SM f-- -1 - --- f-2 - ~ - '-3 - --- '-4 - '- '-5 - '-- '--6 - -- '--7 -" -- '-8 -X 9 '--- 9 ..... - '---- .... - i-- -- '--- i-- '-- '--- -- .._ - '--- -- i-- .... - -- -- -- ,_ - -- -- EXPLORATORY TEST PIT LOG PALOMAR AIRPORT BUSINESS PARK -PHASE II Carlsbad, Ca-fifornia PROJECT NO. DATE TEST PIT NO. 21-8-3 _ September 1977 6 ------- t ;_ .. I I I I I I I ' I I I I I ii 11 CRG Rlf3 Case 580B Backhoe SURFACE ELEVATION 255 (approx.) LOGGED BY DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER None Test PH extavah:~d with 24 inch bucket on 8/22/77 l-----------------'--;r--.----~---~-"--IDEPTH (FEET) DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION SYM-COLOR BOL CONSIST. SOIL TYPE j DESCRIPTION AND REMARKS SILTY and CLAYEY SAND .(SANDSTONE) SILTY SAND (SANDSTONE) Bottom of Test· Pit = 8 Feet Notes; l) "x" denotes jar sample. · 2) "s 11 denotes sack sample. _No,,: The 11ra1iFicollon line1 repre~nl the opprax1mole . ::oundo,y between material fn>e• and the lron,ilion may ·~gradual. ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES Corsulr.np So,1_ Foundor,on & Geo/op,co/ fnp,neerl redpish dense -SM-..... -X tan very · SC l --. dense - light v_ery SM I-2 - gray dense -- ..... 3 - ..-- -4 ·- ..... .. -5-... -... 6 ;__ -- I-7 -s ... - 8 ... ---... -..,_ - -- '-- -- .... - L---- .... - L--... -..,_ - -- L-- ..-- .... - -- --... - --- L-- .__ - EXPLORATORY TEST PIT LOG. PALO/v\AR AIRPORT BUSINESS PARK -PHASE II Carlsbad, California PROJECT NO. DATE TEST PIT NO. 1----___;_--.J--------' 218-3 September 1977 7 ]" ., I I I I I I I I I J I J l - f ! - I RIG· Case 5808 Backhoe DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER None SURFACE ELEVATION 184 (approx.) LOGGED BY CRG Test ~it excavated with 24 inch bucket on 8/22/77 . . a:;::- l-------------'----'--------.---r----'-,-----.----I DEPTH (FEET) DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION .SYM-COLOR SOL CONSIST. SO(L W :z I-LU <,-. :i:·:z 0 0 DESCRIPTION AND REMARKS SILTY SAND SILTY SAND (SANDSTONE) Bottom of Test ,Pit L?9 = ) 3. 5 Feet Notes: 1) 11x11 denotes jar sample. ·2) 11s11 denotes sack sample. Note: The slrotlficotion llncs represent the approximate· boundary belwecn molerlol lypn and the trcnsilion may be grodual. _ _ · ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES Consulr,np So,I. Fo11ndol,on t G..olog,col fnpmee,, light brown dark brown light. browrt light tan medium dense dense TYPE SM L-- .... 1 - -- 2 -SM_ - .... 3 - '-- .... 4 .... -5- .... - -6 - L.. - .... 7 -.. -- .... 8 - -- .... 9 -.... - 1-10--- -11 - .... - -12 -.... -.... 13 - .... 14 - '-- .__ - '-- ,_ -.... - ,_ - .... -.... - .... - -- .... - ---- s X 9 EXPLORATORY TEST PIT LOG PALOMAR AIRPORT BUSINESS PARK -PHASE II Carlsbad, California PROJECT NO. DATE TEST PIT NO. i-----~---+----------1 218..:3 September 1977 8 Jl, ; . ·,-....,R:,--G----'-C_a_s_e-::5:::8:-:0-:-8-:::B:-a-c7"k:-'ho_e ___ -,-S_U_R __ F __ A __ C-::E-::E::--:-L-:E-V_A_T_IO_N_2:--1::-:8:--(:--a-p-p-ro-x-:-~r-L-O_G_G_E_D_B_Y ___ C_R_G __ _ Test .Pit excavated with 24 inch bucket on 8/22777 l r1I LqJ ]I . I i ]] 1 ! ~ I ] :, i . l 1. ] ~ ' ~. I 'DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER None z UJ-, . UJ CW . DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION · 9ut;:: :r z w > :i: a: a::-a: ... < . z iii ... DEPTH w ,-. z...._ w ... ..J < < V) I-z < C) > u:-~ii:VJC,~ w z a: v>, z w Zen· ~ :: lii ~ < w :! :r w 0 x oa:wx DESCRIPTION AND REMARKS i-gt· COLOR (FEET) CONSIST. SOIL < wiij 0 ~~ V) a: I--u~a:- TYPE "' Zw..J 0 lii ~ ? z ~ lii ~ a: l:?. u ::, t) SILTY SAND SILTY SAND (SANDSTONE) ' Bottom of Test. Pit = 12. 5 Fee_t Note: 11x11 denotes jar sample. Note: The 1tr0ti!ic0tion lines represent the opproximol• L:,....,clory between moteriol tn,es ond the tronsifion moy be pra°'10I. ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES Coraul1,ng So,I. Foundor,on I,, Gi,olog,col ·Eng,ncr" tan light tan - -gray loose - . medium dense SM -- -1 -X 27 -- -2 - --... 3 - -- L-4 .. - -5-... - -6 - - ta.ri -· dense gr~ay SM ... -7 - - -8 -X I-- -9 - '-- -10--- '-11 - -- -12 - -13 - I-- L-- -- 1--- : L-- -- L-. - ~ - --... - L-- --- -- -- EXPLORATORY TEST PIT LOG PALOMAR AIRPORT BUSINESS PARK -PHASE II Carlsbad, California PROJECT NO. DATE TEST PIT NO. r--------+-------l 9 21.8-3 September 1977 ·r f [ r I I I I I - J J l ' J· ' J l Case 580B Backhoe · SURFACE E-L·EVATION245.(approx.) LOGGED BY CRG RIG, DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER None Test Pi~ excavated with 24 inch bucket on 8/22/77 L----------------,r--r--'---,--~--,----1 DEPTH (FEET) DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION .SYM· COLOR .BOL CONSIST SOIL . DESCRIPTION AND REMARKS SILTY SAND (SANDSTONE) Bottom of Test Pit= 14.0 Feet Note: "x" denotes: jar sample. ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES ·Coniuh,np So,I. Foundor.on t. Grolop,col fnpm~rrs ta.n gray dense very dense TYPE SM I.... - L... l - -- -2 - I.... - -3 -X '-- -4 - '- -5- -- .... 6 - -- L... 7 - --' .... 8 - -- -9 - .... - -10-.... - -11 -X 17 L... - '-12 - -- '-13 - -- 14 -·- -- .... - -- L... - '-- L... -' -- --' -- '-- ._ - EXPLORATORY TEST PIT LOG PALOMAR AIRPORT BUSINESS PARK -PHASE 11 Cadsbad, California t-_P_R_OJ::-:-E:-C-::T:-N_O_. ---lf---D_A_T_E __ _, TEST PIT NO. 218-3 September 1977 1-0 i - J .. ' ' ' ,RIG ·Case 580B Backhoe ·SURFACE ELEVATION 284-(approx. LOGGED BY CRG T.esf ·pit excavdted with 24 inch bucket on 8/22/77 8 a I a. rl u a DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER· None DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION DESCRIPTION AND REMARKS SILTY SAND SANDY ClAY SYM-COLOR BOL brown light brown CONSIST. medium dense very stiff DEP TH SOIL (FEE Tl TYPE SM .... - 1 - - 2 - z..,-.. w O iu Q l) t: . :CZ LU > :C a: a: -z.;; ... LU .... z....._ w ... -a::;~-_, < <.,, -"'Cl Cl. ::: lii 3: .,_z <za:"-U. LUZ <"' LU UJQl/l z a: LU ~ ~~g 3:~ il5 a: ... !:. 0 Cl. a: < l) ~ ... Ill 0 lii~ I.'. a: e l) z O Ill :, 0 X X 19 SILTY SAND orange-dense-SM i-- Bottom of Test Pit= 14. 0 Feet Notes: 1) "x11 denotes jar sample. 2) 11s11 denotes sack somple. Nole: The tlrclification lines repruenl the ·opproximole · Loundory.bet-wun material types and the lranaition moy Le gro6.>ol. ROBERr PRATER ASSOCIATES Co"'""'"" So,I fov,,dar,o,, t. Grol~,col fng,nrrrs · ish tan- gray very -,-3 - dense -- f--4 .. I--5 -- i-- ._ 6 -s f--- I-7 - I-- '-8 .- I--... 9 - '-- '--10-... - '-11 - I-- .... 12 -... -... 13 -- '-- 14 I-- '--- L.. - : I----... - '-- L.. - .... - '-. -... - .___ - EXPLORATORY TEST PIT LOG PALOMAR AIRPORT BUSINESS PARK -PHASE 11 Carlsbad, California t---'-PR_OJ--'--E_C_T_N_O_. ~---D_A_T_E __ _J TEST PIT NO. 218-3 September 1977 11 u: I "' !:. ~--····· I· I I I I I I I D D D Il - r1 JJ 1l ]J RIG Case 580B Backhoe DEPTH 10-G-ROUNDWATER None SURFACE ,ELEVATION 200.(approx. LOGGED_ ~y CRG Test ,Pit e;cavated with 24 inch bucket on_ 8/22/77 . . I---_;_---------------,--,--.----,--, DEPTH SOIL (FEET) CONSIST. TYPE _ DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION SYM-COLOR BOL a: -w,._ ,._z <"' . 3: !z 0 u DESCRIPTION AND REMARKS SANDY and CLAYEY SILT SILiY CLAY Bottom of Test Pit = l O. 0 Feet Note: 1) 11x" denotes jar sample. Note: The 1trotilicati0n lines repruent the approximate bounclary betw·ecn ,nalcrial types and the transition may 6"' """*'°I• ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES Cor.1ul1,no So,I. foundol,on & Geolog,col fno,nrr,s light brown gray- tan loose very stiff hard ML ..... - .... 1 -X ,-- .... 2 - ,-- ,-3 -- 4 .. CH ..... .. ,__ 5- ,-- ,-6 - ,---7 -X 19 ; .... - ,-8 - I-- I-9 - I-- 10 I-- I-- I-- I-- I-- I-- '-- '-- ..... - hr---- I-_ - '-- ..... - ..... - ..... - -- ..... - ..... - L.-- EXPLORATORY TEST PIT LOG PALOMAR AIRPORT BUSINESS PARK -PHASE 11 Carlsbad, California PROJECT NO. DATE TEST PIT NO. t---=----=----4-------___J 21-8-3 -September l977 12 - /--------------· ---· --· . - ] :-• , r-R-IG.,..._-_ ..,--C-o_s_e_5-::8-::0-B-::8-o-c-,-k-;-h-o_e ____ '-S~U::R-:F-:--AC':"E:--:E:-L=Ev::A-:--:T=1-::~-:-N---_-__ --r-L-O_G_G_E_D_B_Y __ C_R_·G __ _ ·1. DEPTH TD GROUNDWATER None . Test Pit excavot.ed with 24 inch b• 0 u:~et_ 6~ 8/22/77 I fJ ' ]J J JJ •. rn :..1J [II ra DESCRIPTION AND C!-ASSIFICATION a: _ o t: • :r ~ ~ ~ :r ~-'<~-Ill ffi1-z-a:1-< z;;;1--<">U:-i,:lll"U:- Q. :=!ii3: -~"',_ . ...,zcr.,,,2 wz"' 1------------------.-T""---,-----,,-~D~PTH DESCRIPTION AND REMARKS SYM-COLOR SOL CONSIST. SOIL TYPE (FEET) ::i ui-o ,,.2 :r~0 " oa:"'a:" < Zl/l..J ;,. Ill 1--OCI. -"' "'ai o 1->-z::i1-~a:-0 1/)al ::>81/) SIL TY SAND (SANDSTONE) : Bottom of Test Pit= 6.5 Feet Note: "x" denotes jar sample. ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES Co,,.ullrng So,I. Fo~ndol,on & G.,olog,col fng,n""" brown medium SM f-- reddish-dense 1 --X /4. dense orange · , . .... - --2 -. .... - tan-very -3 -X 11 white -dense - -4 - - >--5- -- L..-6 - L..-7 - L..-- L..-- -- L..-- L..-- ...... -.... - -- . ---- -- -.... - .... - ---- .... - I-- >---: ... - "' ----.. -- -- -- -- -.... - -- ...... - EXPLORATORY TEST PIT b.OG PALOMAR AIRPORT BUSINESS PARK :... PHASE 11 Carlsbad, California DATE TEST PIT-NO. r-----1----.:____J ,.--. ) 218-3 September 1'977 \-· 13 J PROJECT NO. ' - .1 I i I I ].,_- a I • J I I I J l l 1 1 I 1 ' '· ·, .. . RIG . Case :580B Backhoe SURFACE EL~VATION ---LOGGED BY CRG .. DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER None Test Pit excavated with 24 inch bucket on 8/22/77 L-------------------,--.-----r----,-----l DEPTH (FEET) DESCRIPTION ANO CLASSIFICATION SYM-COLOR :BOL · SOIL CONSIST .. TYPE DESCRIP.TION AND REMARKS brown loos~ -medium ·SC -- .,_ ___ -'--____ --------'-"~-4--.:::.:oronae · dense SILTY SAND (SANDSTONE) white very CLAYEY SAND 1 - · sM Boftom of Test Pit= 5.5 F~et .. (met refusal) Notes: l). 11 x11 denotes jar sample. _2) 11s11 denotes sock s1=iinple. _Nore: The strollficalion lines rcprescnl the opp,oximole :,ouodary bc,twecri moteriol types orid rhe lron1ilion rnc,y w proa.,ol. ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES Cor.sull,,;Q So,I. fo.,ndot,on t. Gr:olC>Q•col Enp,i>,:,:,s brown-orange dense. -- ,_ 2 -s ,_ - L. 3 - ~ .. '-4 L. '-5 -X 6 '-6 - .... - '-- ., '-- ,_ - ,_ -... - '-- '--- L.... - '--... - I-- L.... -.... - '-- .... - L.... -.. ,__ - ,_ - .... - L.... - I-- I-- -- I-- '--... - ,__ - EXPLORATORY TEST PIT LO.G PALOMAR AIRPORT BUSINESS PARK -PHASE JI Carlsbad, California PROJECT NO. DATE TEST PIT NO. r----::-::-:::--:::---+-=---:------' 218-3 September 1977 14 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I APPENDIX B LABORATORY TESTING 8-1 The natural water content was determined on selected samples and is recorded on the test pit logs at the appropriate sample ~epths. Two Atterberg Limits tests and twelve No. 200 sieve tests were performed on selected samples of the subsurface materials to determine the ranse of water content over which these materials exhibit plasticity and to aid in c.lassifying the soils according to· the Unifie9 Soil Classification System. The results of these tests are presented on Figures B-1 and B-2. Two laboratory gradation tests were performed on selected samples of the materials en- countered in the test pits. The results of these te~ts ore presented on Figure 8-3. Two laboratory compaction tests (ASTM D 1557-70) were performed on selected bulk samples of the on-site materials. The results of these tests are presented on Figures B-4 and B...,5. Two laboratory direct shear tests were performed on remolded samples of the on-site materials compacted to approximately 90 percent of the maximum dry density as determined by A$TM Test Designation D 1557-70. The samples were sheared at a constant rate under various surcharge pressures. Failure was token at the pe~k shear stress. The r~sults of the direct shear tests ore presented on Figures B-6 and B-7. _ __.____________ -- I ·1 ~ • , ... r------------------..,..---~---------,-------------------- ) I ) I J J J J· I ~ .1.1 71 il >< w 0 z 60 50 40 -30 >-. 1-c:r ~ 20 <t ..J Q. KEY SYMBOL 0 -- 10 7 4 0 V CL MH V ~ l-----+---+--+---l---2'L.f---+----I-or--1-----1----1 ~v " --l,.--,--......-11---7"-r-.Jr CL -ML '/ / ./ 1.//411! · ML or OL ,.______ ML 1 / I 0 · 10 20 30 40 50 ~ 60 LIQUID LIMIT (%) 70 TEST SAMPl,.E NATURAL LIQUID PLASTICITY OH 80 90 100 PASSING LIQUIDITY UNIFIED SOIL PIT DEPTH WATER LIMIT INDEX NO. 200 INDEX NO.. CONTENT SIEVE CLASSIFICATION (feet) % % % % SYMBOL : l 2.0 10 ----18 --SM 1 6.0 17 38 11 69 --ML ' 1 8.0 19 ----79 --ML 2 0.5 20 ----50 --SM-ML 3 1.0· 19 ----65 --CL 4 8.0 8 . ----17 --SM 8 9.0·· 9 ----37 --SM 9 1.0· 27 ----46 --SM 9 8.0 9 --38 --SM ' PLASTICITY CHART AND DATA ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES PALOMAR AIRPORT BUSINESS PARK -PHASE II -Carlsbad, California Consulr.np So,1.fcundolton & Geolo0,co/ fnp,neets PROJECT NO. DATE 21-8-3 . September 1977 Figure 8-l - ]. ] l J J 1 . . - ,,.. '.It. u X w 0 z >-r-c3 i= CJ) ~ ...I a. KEY SYMBOL 0 60 50 40 30 20 10 7 4 0 .V CL MH / t------lf----+---+----+---,~~"4----+----1--or--+---+----.j // i., CL -ML-1,[/~' /--r. /-+[/"7"-"/"7"'::11 ,,,~ --------ML __ I/ 0 , 10 20 30 .Ml or OL I 40 50 60 LIQUID LIMIT (%) 70 TEST NATURAL SAMPLE LIQUID PLASTICITY OH 80 90 100 PASSING LIQUIDITY UNIFIED SOIL PIT WATER N0.200 DEPTH LIMIJ INDEX INDEX CLASSIFICATION NO. CONTENT SIEVE ( feet) % % % % SYMBOL 10 11.0 17 ----36 ·--SM 11 1.5 19 ----55 --CL 12 · 7;0 19 59 30· 90 --CH : : ' i ' . PLASTICITY CHART AND DATA ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES PALOMAR AIRP-ORT BUSINESS PARK -PHASE 1-1 Carlsbad, California Coniufl,ng So,/. Foundor.on l. Geolog,col fng,neeis PROJECT NO. DATE 218-3 September 1977 figure B-2 - .. n , .. "\ ll I JJ .I 11 I II d d d d il a [) a I] j 1 100 ,0 .ao 70 " = =-60 < L .. % .. 50 u IC .. .. ,o JO 20 10 0 - ~ .. -- UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (ASTM D <&22·72) U. S. STA·NDARD SIEVE SIZES 7 ' 3 2 1 J/A 1,'.2 IIA A I 10 u 20 JO -lO 50·60 110 100 :ioo 325 - ' -' ' ' ' ' ' . - " ' . -~ ' " -' -...... . --. ----- ' 100 .50 10.0 s.o 1.0-0..5 0.1 .os .01 .005 . 'PARTICLE SIZE IN MILLIMETERS GRAVEL SANO COBBLES 1-------.------4---....-------.-------1 COARSE I 511..T ANO CLAY F'INE COARSE ' - TEST KEY PIT SAMPLE ELEV. SYMBOL DEPTH (leet) NO. (leel) -: 1 6.0 236 ---2 .5.0 249 ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES MEDIUM : UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYMBOL ML. SM FINE SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SANDY and CLAYEY SILT, gray-tan SILTY SA~D, yellowish tan GRADATION TEST-DATA - 0 10 20 JO ,o 50 '° 70 ao ' ' '° 100 .00I Cor.i.,11,r.g So,I. foundoi,on &-Geolop•col-fnpineers PALOMAR AIRPORT BUSINESS PARK -PHAS·E II Carlsbad, California PROJECT NO. DATE ._ ___ 2-18--3---+---S-e-p-te_m_b_e_r_l _97-7--1 FIGURE B-3 0 ., .: < .. "' It .. % "' IJ. :r .., Q. I ·, . , ):· ,, .1.· l l l I l l l 9 ;~ ~ 1,1 ·rt ~ ·g n· ~ r.l ~ q i,,I ff :,I SAMPCE"" DEPTH SPECIFIC LIOUIO PLASTIC NO. IFT.l SAMPLE DESCRIPTION GRAVITY LIMIT INDEX · -1%) TP-1 6.0 SANDY and CLAYEY SILT (ML), gray-ton ------ - Zero Ail: Voids Curv·e - Specific: Gravity= 2.70 125 I\ j \, 120 \ \ . ' -0 0. 1, -\ >-' I-115 -. ' -(./) .......---~ ,-....__ \ z I . '-w / ' Cl -\ ~ \ \ -.... >-I 'K a:: . \ Cl \ 110 \ \ \ h \ ~ r\ ' " 105 \ , 0 5 10 15 20 : 25 : MOISTURE CONTENT % .. OPTIMUM WATER CONTENT% 13.6 ' MAXIMUM DRY DENS_ITY, pcf · 114. 9 . ·i TEST DESIGNATION ASTM D 1557-70 COMPACTION TE'ST RESULTS ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES PALOMAR AIRPORT BUSINESS PARK -PHASE II c,,,,i.,/t,rg So,I, Foundor,on t Grolog,col fng,nrr•s Carlsbad, California PROJECT NO, DATE B-4 . FIGURE 21-8-3 Sept-ember 1977 '• ---------·-········· ---. ·1 ~' ~' . . a I ] 1 • I l 1 l ] l ) J : }-' ~ . . ...... -- SAl,,IPL-E , DEPTH SAMPLE SPECIFIC LIOUI0 PLASTIC NO. IFT,) DESCRIPTION GRAVITY LIMIJ IN0EX • (0~ . TP-2 5.0 SILTY SAND (SM), yellowish tan ------ . - Z.ero Air Voids Curve Specific Gravity= 2.~0 130 \ ' \ ' Ji. .. K' 125 \ .. \ . -0 \ 0. -\ >-I-120 \ -CJ) \ z w ,,..., Cl ~ . ,/ .-:"( '\ \ >-v -0:: / h 0 ., ~ \ 115 ,...../ . -). ~ \\ / \ , \ .. I\ 1 lr ' 0 : 5 10 15 20 25· MOISTURE CONTENT % OPTIMUM WATER CONTENT % 12.·s MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY, pcf 118.4 - TEST DESIGNATION ASTM D 1557-70 . COMPACTION TEST RESULTS ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES PALOMAR AIRPORT BUSINESS PARK -PHAS:E II Co~s .. h,ng So,I. Fo.,ndo•,o,. I, Grolog,col fnr;,,.rrrs Carlsbad, California PROJECT NO. DATE 218-3 September 1977 FIGURE B-5 . ------ -----... -.-· '1 <) ii~· .. ,. I ' ' ' l ~ 4 I if 4 J J . -. . 5.0 - 4.C - U::-(. )_... en 3.0 :::i:::: -----ch. ----Cl) w ~ a: ----.... Cl) ----a: .. ct 2.0 -----w -------(::) :r: Cl) ~ ~ .. ~ ----1.0 ,' 0 1.0 2.0 3._o 4.0 5.0 6.0 NORMALPRESSURE(KS~ - SAMPLE DATA : TEST DATA 0EscR1PTtON: SANDY and CLAYEY SILT {ML), TEST NUMBER 1 2 : 3 "' gray-tan · NOFi"'!AL PRESSURE (KSF) 1.00 2 .• 50 5.00 SHEAR STRENGTH (KSF) 1.75 1.93 3.09 Test Pit No • : l INITIAL H,0 CONTENT·(~~! 13.6 13.6 13.6 DEPTH (II.): 6. O · l ELEVATION (ll):234(appro·x: FINAL H,O CONTENT (0/41 21.9 21.9 21.9 TEST RE SUL TS INITIAL ORY DENSITY (PCF) 103.4 103.4 103.4 APPARENT COHESION (C): 1.28 ksf . FINAL ORY DENSITY (PCF) --------- APPARENT ANGLE OF INTERNAL FRICTION (!PJ: • l SX> STRAIN RATE: 0.02 inches/minute (approx.) . Note: Test was p·erformed on sample remolded to approximately 90% of the laboratory maximum density and then al'lowed to saturate before shearing. DIRECT SHEAR TEST DATA PALOMAR AIRPORT BUSINESS PARK. -PHASE II RO.BERT PRATER ASSOCIATES Carlsbad, California Cons11ll,ng So,l.fovndot,on & Geolog,col fng,neeu PROJECT NO. DATE 218-3 September 1977 Figure B-.6 - ~ ·--· l ' .. -.-.... · ·-~~ 1 t. ·l _,., .. ·,. --_,;,:__ ___ ..:.....--'---"-------------"-------------------------- ll I I l· l 1 11 .. ] 1 ---1 ~ l 1 lj J 5.0 L---~ ____ v-- 4.0l---1----l-----4----+---'---1--~--~~;__-~..._---lf-----l----+---4---~ L---v-- L---(:,fY. u:-L---' J.--- ~ 3.01---i----+----t---i---+--------t---+----+---+---+-----.f---l Cf) Cf) w a: I-. Cf) a: < C ~ 2.0 Cf) 1.01---~---t----1---+---t----~-'----t---1----+--+-----+-----I 0 1.0 2.0, 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 NORMAL PRESSURE (KSF) DESCRIP"(ION: SAMPLE DATA SILTY SAND (SM), yellowish ton Test Pit No. : 2 DEPTH 111.1: 5. O _ I ELEVATION 1111:249(approx. TEST RESULTS APPARENT COBESION (C): 3 • 11 ksf APPARENT ANGLE OF INTERNAL FRICTION 14>): 17o TEST DATA TEST NUMBER 1 2 3 NORMAL PRESSURE (KSF) 1.0( 5.00 SHEAR STRENGTH (KSF) 3.42 4.70 INITIAL H,O CONTENT (0/4) 12.6 12.6 FINAL 11,0 CONTENT(%) 16. l 16. l INITIAL DRY DENSITY (PCF) 106.3 106.3 FINAL DAY DENSITY (PCF) ---< --- ST·RAIN RATE: 0.02 inches/minute (approx. Note: Test was performed on sample remolded to approximately 90% of the laboratory _ maximum density and then allowed to saturate befo·re shearing. DIRECT SHEAR TEST 't;ATA ,4 \ ROB.ERT PRATER ASSOCIATES -.Consull,ng So.I. foundor,on & Grolc;;,col Eng,nre11 PALOMAR AIRPORT BUSINESS PARK -PHASE II Carlsbad, California PROJECT NO DATE 218-3 September 1977 · Figure 8-7 .. l ,. ,.-. ii ·,,. " . ~ l. I J I J J· I I 11 • a l1 ff 9 0 J l 1. GENERAL A. Scope of Work APPENDIX C GUIDE SPECIFICATIONS -SITE EARTHWORK . FOR PALOMAR AIRPORT BUSINESS PARK -PHASE II CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA C-1 These specifications a_nd applica~le plans pertain to and include all site.earthwork includ- ing~ but not limited to, the furni'sliing of all labor,· fools, and equipment necessary for site cf earing and stripping, disposal of excess ·materials, excavation, preparation of foundation · materials for receiving fill, and placement and compaction of_ fi II to the lines and grades shown on the project grading plans. · B. Performance The Contractor warrants al I work to be performed and all materials to be furnished under this contract against defects in materials or workmanship for a period of ___ year(s) from the date_ of written acceptance of the entire construction work by the Owner. Upon written notice of any defect in materials or workmanship during said ___ year period, the Contractor shall, at the option of the Owner, repair or replace said defect and any damage to other work c~used by or resulting from such defect without cost to the Owner. This shall not limit any rights of the Owner under the "acceptance and inspection" c I ouse of this contract. The Contractor shall be responsible for the satisfactory comp! etion of all site earthwork in accordance with the project plans and specificat.ions. This work shall _be observed and_ tested by a representative of Robert J>rot~r Associates, hereinafter known as the ~_oil_Jngin~er. Both the Soil Engineer and the Architect/Engineer ore the 00ner's representatives. If the Contractor should fail; to meet the technical or design requirements embodied in this document and on the applicable plans, he shall make the necessary readjustments until all work is deemed satisfactory as determined by the Soil Engineer and the Architect/Engineer. No . deviation from the specifications shall be mode except upon written approval of the Soil Engineer or Architect/Engineer •. No si fe earthwork shall be p~rforme_d without the physical presence or approval of the Soil_ Engineer. The Contractor .shall notify the Soil Engineer at least 24 hours prior to commencement of any aspect of the site earthwork; The Soil Engineer shol I be the Owner's representative to obse-rve the eorthwo.rk operations during the site preparation work and placement and compaction of fills. He shot! make ' ' ·----- J .. , il ;, ·I . I I I I I I I I I I I J 1 J 1 J 1 ~ C-2 enough visits to the site to.familiarize himself generally with the progress and_quality of the work. He shall make a sufficient number of tests and/or observations to enable him to form an opinion regarding the adequacy of the site preparation, the acceptability of the fill material, and the extent to which the compaction of the fill, as placed, meets the specification requirements. Any fill·that does not meet the specification requirements shol I be removed and/or re.compacted u~til the requirements are satisfied. In accordance with generally ~ccepted co;,struction practices,: the Contractor shall be solely and completely responsible for working. conditions at the job site, including safety of all persons and property_during performance of the work. This requirement shall apply continuously and shall not be l·imited to normal working hours. · Any construction review of the Controcto~'s performance condocted by the Soil Engineer is not intended to include review of the ad~quacy of the Contractor's safety measures in, on or near the construction site. Upon completion of the construction work, _the Co.ntractor shofl ·certify that all compacted fills and foundations are in place at the c.orrect locations, have the correct dimensions, are plumb, and hove been constructed in accordance with sound construction practice. In addition, he shall certify that the materials used are of the types, quantity and quality required by the plans and specifications. C. Site and Foundation Conditions The Contractor is presumed to hove visited the site and to have familiarized himself with existing site conditions and the soil report titled 11 Geotechnical Investigation, Palomar Airport Business Park -Phase II, Carlsbad, California, 11 dated September 19, 1977. The Contractor shall not be relieved of liability under the contract for any loss sustained as a resulrof any variance between conditions indicated by or deduced from the soil report and the actual conditions encountered during the course of the work. The Contractor shall, upon becoming aware. of surface and/or ·subsurface conditions differ- ing from those disclosed by the original soil investigation, promptly notify the Owner as to the nature and extent of the differing conditions, first verbally to permit:verificatipn of the conditions, and then in writing. No claim_by the Contractor for any_ conditi_ons differing from those anticipated in the plans and specifications and disclosed.by the soil investigation will be allowed unless the Contractor has so notified the Owner, verbally and in writing, as required above, of such changed conditions. · D. Dust Control The Contractor shall assume responsibility for the alleviation or prevention of any dust nuisance on or about the site or off-site-borrow areas. The Contractor shall ·assume all liability, including court costs of co-defendants, for all claims related to dust or wind- blown materials attributable to his work. l -.. ,, ~J-•../., ] -1 ~1 .3 !I I ] I ] ] C-3 11. DEFINITION OF TERMS STRUCTURAL FILL -All soil or soil-rock material placed at the site in order to raise grades or to backfill excavations, and upon which the Soil Engineer has made · sufficient tests and/or observations to enable him to issue a written statement that, in his opinion, the. Fil I has been placed and compacted in acc_?rdance with the specification requirements. ON-SITE MATER !AL -Material obtained from the required site excavations. IMPORT MATERIAL -Material obfained from off-site borrow areas. ASTM SPECIFICATIONS -The 1970 .edition C;?f the America~ So~iety for Testing a'nd Materials Standards. DEGREE OF COMPA~TION .:. The ratio, expressed as a pe(centage, of the in-place . · dry density of fhe compacted fi II mat~rial to· the maxim_um dry density of the same mat_erial as determined by ASTM Test Designation D 1557-70. 111. CLEARING AND STRIPPING All areas to be graded shall be cleared of debris, brush, chaparral, designated trees, and associatedroots. The cleared materials shall be disposed of off-site. After clearing, any cultivated areas as well as all other areas supp~i-fing a growth of surface grass and weeds shall be stripped to a suffic.ient depth to remove all surface vegetation and organic laden topsoil. The actual stripping depth shall be determined in the field by the Soil Engineer at lhe time of construction. IV. EXCAVATION All excavation shall be performed to the lines and grades and within the tolerances specified on the project grading plans. All over-excavation below the grades specified shall be backfilled at .the Contractor's expense and '.shall be compacted in accordance w~th the specifications. The Cont~actor shall assume full respqnsibility fort.he stability of all temporary construction slopes at the site. V. PREPARATION f.-OR FILLING Surfaces to receive compacted firt shall be scarified to a minimum depth of 6 in~hes, moisture .conditioned and compacted. Any pockets of loose, saturated colluvium shall be removed and recompacted. The need for removal and recompaction shall be determined by the Soil Engineer in the field at the time of construction.· All ruts, hummocks, or other · uneve_n surface features shall be removed by surface grading prior to placement of any fill materials. All areas which ore to receive fill material shall be approved by the Soil Engineer prior to the plqcement of any fill material. I. JJ JJ II fl q ' ~ ~ ' C-4 Fills constructed on natural slopes having an inclination steeper than 5 horizontal to 1 vertical shall be keyed <:Jnd benched into f'irm natural ground below any loose surface soils at the direction of the. Soil Engineer. VI. MATERIA~S FOR FILL All existing on-site soils are in general suitable for reuse as fill. Fill material shall not, however, contain rpcks or lumps larger than 6 inches in greatest dimension with not more than 15 percent larger thoi,·2.5.inches. The use of potentially expansive soil as fill shall conform to the requirements of Section VII, "EXPANSIVE SOILS." All material for use as fill shall be subject to approval by the Soil Engineer. · · The existing topsoil stockp.ile .located in the-southeast portion of the site may be reused as fi II in the lower portions of the deeper site fills. However, any concentration of organic material shall be selectively re.moved and disposed of off-site. The method of placement and suitability of the material~ shall be s't.1~ject to the Soil Engineer1s approval. VII. EXPANSIVE SQILS . . . Potentially expansive soils taken from the required site excavations shall be used as fill only up to within 2 feet of the design fin.ish grades in street pavement areas and on lots; the upper 2 feet of fill shall be comprised of non-expansive sandy fill material. The determination as to which materials are expansive and which are not shall be made in the field during construction by the Soil Engineer. VIII. PLACING AND COMPACTING Fill MATERIAL All structural fill shall be compacted by mechanical means to produce a minimum degree ·of compaction of 90 percent as determined by-ASTM Test Designation D1557-70. Field density tests shall be performed in accordance with either ASTM Test Designation Dl556-64 (Sand-Cone Method) or ASTM Test Designation D2922-71 and D3017-72 (Nuclear Probe Method). · The locations and number of field density tests shall l;,e determined by the Soil Engineer. The results of these tests an<;f compliance with these specifications shall be the basis upon which satisfactory completion :of work shal I be judged by the Soil Engineer. Fill material shal I b~ placed in uniform lifts not exceeding 8 inches in uncompacted thick- ness. Before compaction begins, the filrshall be brought to a water content that will permit proper compaction by either: 1) aerating the fi 11 if it is Joo wet, or 2) moistening the fi II with water if it is too dry. Each _lift shall be thoroughly mixed befo~e compaction to insure a uniform distribution of moisture. Fill slopes shall be constructed so as to assure that a minimum degree or" compaction of 90 percent is attained to within 18 inches of the finished slope face and that a minimum degree of compaction· of 85 percent is attained in the outer 18 inches. This shali be accomplished by 11backrolling11 with a sheepsfoot roller or _other suitable equipment in 5 to 8 foot vertical· increments as the fill is raised. Placement of fill near the tops.of slopes shal·J be carried out in such a manner as to assure .that loose, uncompacted soils are not sloughed over the tops and allowed to accumulate on the 'slope foce. · ~.:...··-···· J, ' I I I I I I ~ ~ I fl l1 ti 0 ii Q C-5 It shal I be the Contractor's obligation _to take all measures deemed necessary during grading to provide erosion control devices in order to protect slope areas and adjacent properties from storm damage and flood hazard originating on this project. It shall be the Contractor's responsibility to maintain slopes in their as-graded form untir all slopes, berms, and associated drainage de:-'ices cire in _satisfactory compliance_ with the project plans and specifications. IX. TRENCH BACKFILL Pipeline trenches shall be backfilled with compacted fill. Backfill material shall be placed in lift thicknesses appropriate to the type of compaction equipment utilized and compacted to a minimum degree of compaction of 85 percent by mechanical means. In all slab-on-grade and pavement areas the upp~r portion of the backfill to a depth equal ~ to. 1.5 times the trench width, but not less than 3 feet, shall l;,e compacted to a minimum degree of compaction of 90 perc_ent. In pavement areas, that portion of the trench backfill within the pavement section shall conform to the mate.rial and compaction requirements of the adjacent pavement section. X. TREATMENT AFTER COMPLETION Oi= EARTHWORK After the earthwork operations have been completed and the Soil Engineer has finished his observation of the work, no further operotions shall be performed·except with the approval of and under the observation of the Soil Engineer. \ ~;'.'>\. -..~ l l -r .... ..,.._ . EARTHWORK O85.ERVATION AND TESTING SERVICES Robert Hendershot A$soc. JAN 2 3 i987 FOR PALOMAR AIRPORT BUSINESS PARK PHASE II . CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA MARCH 1982 March 9_, 1982 218-3D, 4476 ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES Consulting Soil, Foundation & Geological Engineers Palomar Airport Business Park 6361 Yarrow Drive, Suite A Carlsbad, California 92008 Attention:· Mr. Bernard W. Gilmore Re: Earthwork Observation and Testing Services Palomar Airport Business Park -Phase 11 City of Carlsbad Tracts No. 80-33 (Lots 1 throug (Lots 1 through 7, 10, 11, and 17) Carlsbad, California Gentlemen: Robert R. Prater, C.E. 1942-1980 Wm. David Hespe/er, C.E. In accordance with your request we have provided earthwork observation _and testing services in connection with the subject project. We previously _per- formed a geotechnical investigation for the site the results of which were pre- sented in our report titled "Geotechnkal lnvestig'ation, Pal~mar Airport Business Park -Phase 11, Carlsbad, California, 11 dated September 17, 1977. In addition, a soils condition update report dated December 18, 1980, was issued for the ·site. During the period of April 27 thro1.,1gh December 15, 1981, our representatives were present at the site to observe the earthwork operations and to provide · · field· density testing services. The results of the field density and laboratory compaction tests are presented in the attached Tables A and B, respectively. The approximate locations of the field density tests for the mass grading operations are shown on the attached grading plans; Tract 80-33, Sheet 2 of 3, and Tract 80-34, Sheets 2, 3, 4, and 5 of 6. -Based on our observations and the attached test results, it is our opinion that the following items of work have been satisfactorily completed in accordance with the recommendations of the geotechnical investigation report: TRACT 80..-33 1) The mass grading operations as referenced by Test Nos. 1-6, 9-110, 387-394, 415-420, 423-425, and 472-477. 2) Sewerline trench backfills as referenced by Test Nos. 459-471, 480-483, and 506-507. 10505 Roselle Street, Son Diego, California 92121 • /619) 453-5605 March 9, 1982 218-3D, 4476 Page 2 3) Storm drain trench backfills as 'referenced by Test Nos. 508-511, 516-517, 520-523, 535-537, 593-597, 604-605, 752-757, 835-838, and 847-850. 4) Waterline trench backfills as referenced by Test Nos. 571-574. 5) Electric~I trench backfills:as referenced by Test Nos. 722-726, and 730. 6) Pavement subgrade soils (Las Palmas Drive) as referenced by Test Nos. 791-795 (90 percent relative compaction required by City of Carlsbad). 7) Pavement base layer (Las Palmas Drive) as referenced by Test Nos. 809-813, and 846. TRACT 80-34 1) The mass grading operations as referenced by Test Nos. 7-8, 111-317, 320-329, 346-350, 357-386, 395-398, 402-414, 421-422, 426-435, 440-445, 450-458, 478-479, 488-'191, 500-505, 512-515, 518-519, 524-534, 538-556, 562, 569-570, 575-579, 583-587, 598-599, 610-614, 743, and 747-751. 2) Sewer-line trench backfills as referenced by Test Nos. 600-603, 606--607, 615-633, 644-648,· 651-656, and 741-742.· 3) Storm drain trench backfills as referenced by Test Nos. 318-3-19, 330-345, 351-.356, 399-40 l, 484-487, 492-499, 657-673, 705-708, 744-746, and 824~ Ll) Waterline trench backfills as referenced by Test Nos. 436-Ll39, 446-449, 557-561, 608-609, 634-643, 649-650, 678-701, 715-717, 818-823, and 851-856. 5) Electrical trench backfills as referenced by Test Nos. 580--582, 709-714, 718-721, 727-729, 731-740, and 766-767. 6) Box culvert trench backfills as referenced by Test Nos. 563-5.68, 588-592, 674-677, and 702-704. 7) Pavement subgrade soils as referenced by Test Nos. 758-765, 780-790, 814-817, and 825-834 (90 percent relative compaction required :by City of Carlsbad). 8) Pavement base l~yer as referenced by Test Nos. 768-779, 796-808, and 839-845. ' , f..' J. Palomar Airport Road Widening -North Side March 9, 1982 218-3D, 4476 Page 3 t) The mass grading operations as referenced by Test Nos. 1-13, and 15-23. 2) Storm drain trench backfill as referenced by Test No. 14. 3) Pavement sub grade, soils as referenced by Test Nos. 24-31 (90 percent relative compaction required by City of Carlsbad). 4) Pavement base layer as referenced by Test Nos. 32-35. During the mass grading operations for Tract 80-34, approximately 45,000 cubic yards of loose alluvial soils were removed along the southern portions of Lots 10 and 11. The resulting e~cavation was bac~filled with compacted structural fill. . .... Based on our obser:-vations and the attached test results it is our opinion that Lots 1 through 8 of Tract 80-33 and Lots 1 through 7, 10, 11, and 17 of Tract 80-34 have been properly constructed in accordance with the recommendations of the geotechnical investigation report with the following exceptions: 1) Lot 17 of Tract 80-34 i's presently being utilized for stockpiling of excess materials. Elevation 198 was the last reported test elevation. Accordingly, earthwork observation and testing services will be required When this lot is developed for building purposeso 2) A recent field inspection of the project site indicated that at the southeast corner of Lot 8 of Tract 80-33, loose soils apparently from the excavation pei-for_med for the brow ditch were placed on the fill slope; these soils sho4Jd be removed. In addition, backfilling around the headwall-needs to be completed. · 3) On the north side of Palomar Airport Road, a significant amount of erosion has occurred. This has been discussed with Mr. Henry Worley, the Civil Engineer for the project. This erosion problem should be corrected and the toe of the fill slope repaired including backfilling of the culvert headwall. Work remammg at the site which will require additional earthwork inspection services would be associated with the finish grading operations for the lots when any future building pads and parking areas are constructed. It should be noted that during the mass grading operations some selective grading was per- formed in order to provide a non-expansive soil layer for the lots. However as individual Jots are developed and details regarding the proposed construction (incfuding grades) on individual lots become available, the soil engineer should be consulted for specific foundation, concrete slab, and pavement recom- mendations relative to the geotechnical conditions present on any one lot. In particular, the presence of expansive soils on some of the lots may require special treatment of the foundation soils and/or special design featur~s in the proposed buildings in order to minimize the possible detrimental effects of the expansive soils. , I 1 - March 9, 1982 218-30, 4476 Page 4 Our services consist of professional opinions and recommendations made in accordance with generally accepfed geotechnical engineering principles and practices. This warranty is in lieu of all other warranties either express or implied. If there are any questions, please call. Very truly yours, ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES ~/4~ John LaBar, RCE No. 22,385 JLB: Is Attachments Copies: Addressee (3) -Henry Worley Associates, Attn: Mr. Henry Worley (2) --·-·· ,___ 210..:30 ,._ TABJ_E A -SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM 01556-64 and/or ASTM 02922-78, ASTM 03017-7~) "' est No. Date of Test ) 1 l J 5/05/81 5/05/81 5/05/81 5/05/81 5/06/81 5/06/81 5/07/81 . 5/07/81 5/08/81 5/08/81 5/08/81 5/08/81 5/08/81 5/08/81 Test Location . Approximate Elevation (Feet) Tract 80-33 -Embankment Lot 2 Lot 2 Lot 8 Lot 3 Lot 8 Lot 8 Tract 80-34 -Embankment Lot 17 Lot 17 Tract 80-33 -Embankment Lot 4 Lot 4 Lot 4 Lot 4 Lot 4 Lot 4 212 212 226 200 224 224 178 182 184 186 187 192 190 192 Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No. 11 refers to Table B. Water Dry Degree of Content Density Compaction Compaction (%) .(pcf) (%) Curve No. 14' 18 14 11 15 16 10 11 12 12 11 14 14 14 92.2 105.1 1011.6 105.4 105.4 1011.0 104.0 105.8 107.3 107.5 106.9 101.5 108.11 103.7 81 92 91 91 91 90 91 92 93 93 93 89 90 91 3 3 3 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 3 3 6 3 2) Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. Remarks Test failed, see #2 ·Retest of # 1 Slope Area Slope Area Slope Area Slope Area Slope Area Slope Area Test failed, see # 14 Toe Key Retest of #12 218 TABLE A -SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS. (ASTM D1556-64 and/or ASTM D2922-78, .ASTM D3017-78) est i2.:_ Date of Test 5/11/81 5/11/81 5/11/81 5/11/81 5/11/81 5/11/81 5/11/81 5/12/81 S/ 12/81 5/12/81 5/12/81 5/12/81 5/12/81 5/13/81 5/13/81 5/13/81 5/13/81 Lot 4 Lot 4 Lot 4 Lot 4 l-ot 4 Lot 2 Lot 2 Lot 2 Lot 2 Lot 2 Lot 2 Lot 8 Test Location Approximate Elevation (Feet) 188 188 190 189 190 204 202 206 204 208 208 228 Las Palmas Dr. N. of Lot 8 Lot 4 215 192 206 226 223 Lot 2 Lot 8 Lot 8 Water Dry Degree of Content Density Compaction Compaction (%) (pcf) (%) Curve No. 20 17 12 11 13 22 lS 18 20 9 11 14 11 8 16 11 10 104.8 112.s 111.8 110.6 109.8 106.9 110.6 111.3 113.9 109.6 lpS.3 108.9 109.4 106.0 107.4 103.7 106.9 91 93 93 92 91 93 92 92 95 95 92 94 96 88 93 91 93 4 6 6 6 6 4 6 6 6 3 3 4 s 6 4 5 4 Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No.11 refers to Table B. 2) Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. Remarks Slope Area Slope Area Slope Area Slope Area Slope Area Slope Area 1-- ,. 218 TABLE A :-SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSltY .TEST RESULTS (ASTM D1556-64 and/or ASTM D2922-78, ASTM D3017-78) st o-' Date of Test 5/13/81 5/13/81 5/13/81 5/13/81 5/14/81 5/14/81 5/14/81 5/ 14/81 5/14/81 5/ 14/81 5/14/81 5/14/81 5/15/81 5/15/81 5/15/81 5/15/81 5/15/81 Lot 2 Lot 4 Lot 1 Lot 2 Lot 1 Lot 1 Lot 3 Lot 3 Lot 2 Lot 8 Lot 2 Lot 3 Lot 1 Lot 3 Lot 1 Lot 3 Lot 3 Test Location Approximate Elevation (Feet) 204 192 196 206 198 200 197 199 216 218 209 202 202. 204 204 192 194 Water Dry Degree of Content Density Compaction Compa~tlon (%) (pcf) (%) Curve No. 12 11 12 15 18 20 24 14 16 24 18 14 13 14 14 16 14 109.5 114.1 111.8 115.3 110.9 109.1 111.3 111.1 110.0 110.4 109.8 ' 111.9 110.3 111.9 114.0 110.3 106.6 95 95 93 96 92 91 92 93 91 93 95 93 92 93 95 96 92 · 4 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 2 4 6 6 6 6 4 4 Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No. 11 refers to Table B. ·2) Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. Remarks Slope Area Slope Area Slope Area 1-, \r ---·~ 218 ,-. TABLE A -SUMMARY. OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM D1556-64 and/or ASTM 02922-78, ASTM 03017-78) ' .. Approximate Water Dry Degree of :)St Elevation Content Density Compaction Compaction ~o. Date of Test Test Location (Feet) (%) (pcf) __!%1 Curve No. Remarks 5/15/81 Lot 3 196 14 107 .8 93 4 5/16/81 Lot 8 221 12 102.9 90 5 5/16/81 Lot 2 215 14 107.0 93 5 5/18/81 Lot 8 224 13 106.1 93 5 5/18/81 Lot 2 214 14 109.3 96 5 5/18/81 Lot 2 211 14 107.7 94 5 . 5/18/81 Lot 8 225 15 107.0 90 2 5/18/81 Lot 2 209 16 111.2 94 2 -5/ 18/81 Lot 2 212 16 112.5 95 2 5/18/81 Lot 8 226 12 110.1 93 2 5/18/81 Lot 2 213 12 108.9 95 5 ' 5/19/81 Lot 1 192 13 105.7 92 5 Slope Area 5/19/81 Lot 2 217 11 105.9 92 5 5/19/81 Lot 8 228 12 105.0 92 5 5/19/81 Lot 3 192 12 108.1 94 5 Slope Area 5/19/81 Lot 8 221 14 106.0 93 5 5/19/81 Lot 8 223 14 106.6 93 5 Slope Area Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No." refers to Table B. 2) Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. 21' TABLE A -SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM D1556.:.64 and/or ASTM D2922-78, ASTM D3017-78) fest No. Date of Test ,6 .7 ,8 .9 0 1 ·2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 5/19/81 5/20/81 5/20/81 5/20/81 5/20/81 5/20/81 '5/20/81 5/20/81 5/21/81 5/21/81 5/21/81 5/21/81 5/21/81 5/21/81 5/21/81 5/21/81 5/26/81 Lot 8 Lot 8 Lot 8 Lot 8 Lot 8 Lot 4 Lot 4 Lot 2 Lot 5 Lot 3 Lot 3 Lot 2 Lot 2 Lot 2 Lot 3 Lot 2 Lot 3 Test Location Approximate Elevation CE~~t) 225 227 228 229 231 194 193 2l9 202 187 189 215 217 214 191 216 193 Water Dry Degree of Content Density Compaction Comp_action (%) (pcf) (%) Curve No. 13 13 14 13 .. 12 13 14 14 13 13 14 14 15 13 14 15 12 . 105.4 105.8 107.6 107.3 106.2 108.7 107.1 108.5 108.3 107.9 106.5 ' 108.7 108.4 107.8 108.1 110.0 107.4 92 92 94 93 92 95 93 95 94 94 93 -95 92 93 94 92 94 5 5 5 1 1 1 5 5 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 5 Notes: }J "Compaction Curve No. 11 refers to Table B. U_nless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. Remarks Slope Area Slope Area I-, .--21f tABLE A -SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST R~SUL TS (ASTM 01556-64 and.for ASTM D2922-78, ASTM D3017-78) est No. 3 4. 5 6 7 B ft 0 1 2 3 !J 5 s 1 II ~ Date of Test 5/26/81 5/26/81 5/26/81 5/26/81 5/26/81 5/26/81 5/26/81 5/27 /81 5/27/81 5/27/81 5/27/81 5/27/81 5/27/81 5/27/81 5/27/81 5/28/&1 5/28/81 Lot 3 Lot 1 Lot 1 Lot 3 Lot 3 Lot 1 Lot 1 Lot 1 ' Lot 1 Lot 3 Lot 3 Lot 1 Lot 1 Lot 3 Lot 1 Lot 1 Lot 8 Test Location Approximate Elevation {Feet) 195 198 200 200 202 196 198 200 202 204 199 203 201 202 204 204 232 Water Dry Degree of Content Density Compaction Comp~ctlon {%) (pcf) (.%) Curve No. 13 l5 13 13 16 15 15 11 13 14 13 14 17 17 16 14 ·14 105.6 115. 1 101.0 107.9 109.0 107.7 109.5 106.3 105.3 104.8 108.4 ' 104.0 107.4 .106.3 104.4 105.4 105.4 92 95 93 94 95 94 96 93 92 91 91 91 91 93 91 92 92 5 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 2 5 2 5 5 5 5 Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No.11 refers to Table B. 2) Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. Remarks Slope Area ,., >, ----·~· 218-30 I" TABLE A -SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM D1556-64 and/or ASTM D2922-78 1 ASTM Q3Q17:-711) - Approximate Water Dry Degree of :·st· Elevation Content Density Comp.action. Compaction ~~ Date of Test Test Location (Feet) (%) _lecf} -J%) Curve No. Remarks )0 5/28/81 Lot 2 218 15 105.8 92 5 1 5/28/81 Lot 1 206 14 104.9 91 5 ;2 5/28/81 Lot 2 219 16 107.4 94 5 .3 S/28/81 Lot 3 205 14 113.3 95 2 14 5/28/81 Lot 2 215 15 107.2 94 5 :5 5/28/81 Lot 1 199 16 107.0 93 1 16 5/29/81 Lot 2 220 14 104.S 91 · 5 ,7 5/29/81 Lot 1 202 16 106.6 93 5 18 5/29/81 Lot 3 207 15 104.8 91 5 19 ·s/29/81 Lot 4 192 16 106.9 93 5 10 5/29/81 Lot 4 194 17 1'10.0 96 5 Tract 80-34 -Embankment 1 6/01/81 Camino Vida Roble -178 16 106.9 93 1 South of Lot 1 O 2 6/01/81 Camino Vida Roble -176 16 102.9 90 5 South of Lot 1 O 3 6/01/81 Camino Vida Roble -180 16 106.4 92 1 South of Lot 1 O !Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No." refers to Table B. 2) Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. 218 TABLE A -SUMMARY OF FIELD DEN,SITY TEST RESULTS, (ASTM D1556-64 and/or ASTM D2922-78, ASTM t)3017-78) est ~o. Date of Test 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 n 22 23 !4 !5 26 27 ts 29 10 6/01/81 6/01/81 6/01/81 6/02/81 6/02/'11 6/02/81 . 6/02/81 6/02/81 6/02/81 6/02/81 6/02/81 6/02/81 6/02/81 6/02/81 6/03/81 6/03/81 6/03/81 Approximate ,Water Dry Degree of Elevation Content Density Compaction Compaction Test Location (Feet) (%) (pcf) (%) Curve No. Lot 6 Lot 6 Lot 6 Lot 6 Lot 6 252 259 254 260 260 Lot 6 257 Lot 6 262 Lot 6 258 Lot 6 262 Lot 6 260 Corte Del Abeto W. of Lot 6 254 Lot 5 Lot 5 Lot 5 Lot 5 Lot 5 Lot 5 247 250 253 256 226 222 17 17 16 ,15 16 11 15 15 14 14 15 15 16 16 13 13 11 103.3 97.4 96.2 102.2 103.4 104.9 108.1 105.1 104.7 104.9 108.3 ' 98.2 98.4 95.9 104.7 105.4 106.8 90 92 91 89 90 91 91 92 91 92 91 93 93 91 90 91 90 3 7 7 5 5 3 2 3 3 3 2 7 7 7 4 4 2 Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No.11 refers to Table B-. 2) Unless, otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. Remarks Test falled, see # 118 Retest of # 117 Slope Area Slope Area Slope Area Slope Area ,.., ----·--· -----. ,...-.. ..,,. ..... . ... ' ----~ ---2UI -,. TABLE A -SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM D1556-64 and/or ASTM D2922-78, ASTM D3017-78) Approximate Water Dry Degree of 1st Elevation Content Density Compaction Compaction fo. Date of Test Test Location (Feet)_ (%} _(f?!:f) _ __(%) Curve No. Remarks 1 6/03/81 Lot 4 193 12 105.5 91 4 2 6/03/81 Lot 5 228 13 108.0 93 4 3 6/03/81 Lot 4 190 15 109.9 92 2 4 6/04/81 Lot 5 216 20 106.7 92 4 5 6/04/81 Lot 4 192 18 t.07.4 90 2 6 6/04/81 Lot 4 202 16 106.7 90 2 7 6/04/81 Lot 4 196 14 . 106.0 91 4 3, 6/04/81 Lot 6 26i 16 109.5 93 2 9 6/04/81 Lot 6 263 16 113.8 94 6 0 6/04/81 Lot 6 265 16 111. 7 97 1 1 6/04/81 Lot 6 261 16 109.1 92 2 ' 2 6/04/81 Lot 6 263 14 108.8 92 2 3 6/04/81 Lot 4 204 14 108.4 92 2 q 6/05/81 Lot 5 238 14 109.5 94 4 Slope Area 5 6/05/81 Lot 5 240 14 108.6 94 4 Slope Area 6 6/05/Sl Lot 5 242 14 111.3 92 6 Slope Area 7 6/05/81 Lot 6 266 14 107.5 90 2 Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No.11 refers to Table B. 2) Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. 218 TABLE A -SUMMARY. OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM D1556-64 and/or ASTM D2922-78, ASTM D3017-78) est .Jo. Date of Test -. 18 19 ;o i1 i2 ;3 j4 ;5 i6 ;7 i8 ;9 iO i1 ;2 ;3 ;4 6/05/81 6/05/81 6/05/81 6/05/81 6/05/81 6/05/81 6/05/81 6/08/81 6/08/81 6/08/81 6/08/81 6/08/81 6/08/81 6/08/81 6/08/81 6/09/81 6/09/81 Test Location Approximate Elevation IE~~t) Lot 6 264 Lot 6 264 Lot 2 244 Lot 2 247 Lot _3 262 Lot 3 264 Lot 3 266 Lot 2 249 Lot 2 251 Corte Del Abeto E. of Lot 2 258 Lot 1 Lot 5 Lot 2 Lot 5 Lot 5 Lot 2 Lot 2 228 240 253 231 245 233 254 -Water Dry Degree of Content Density Compaction Compaction (%) (pcf) (%) Curve No. 12 15 14 -16 16 15 14 13 13 14 16 16 14. 14 14 14 15 106.2 112.9 109.5 110.2 109.4 107.7 103.6 106.5 105.2 107.9 \09.3 107.6 107.6 109.8 109.2 105.6 107.1 92 95 92 93 95 93 90 93 92 93 95 93 93 95 94 92 94 5 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No." refers to Table B. 2) Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. Remarks Slope Area Slope Area Slope Area Slope Area ,. ., ·------~----.. ---· ·--· ·-"_,_.,_ -----•·-... " --·~· .. 21" "hi {' TABLE A -SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM D1556-64 and/or ASTM D2922-78, ASTM D3017-78} Approximate Water Dry D~gree of ,.. est Elevation Content Density Compaction Compaction No. Date of Test Test Location (Feet) (%) _J_ec:f) _(%) Curve No. Remarks 65 6/09/81 Lot 2 247 14 ·105.7 92 5 66 6/09/81 Lot 4 194 16 113.0 94 6 67 6/09/81 Lot 4 196 17 111.4 92 6 68 6/09/81 Lot 4 196 16 .. 109.0 90 6 69 6/09/81 Lot 4 190 15 97.7 84 4 Test failed, see 1171 Slope Area 70 6/09/81 Lot 4 192 16 106.3 92 4 Slope Area 71 6/09/81 Lot 4 190 15 106.6 92 4 Retest of # 169 Slope Area 72 6/10/81 Lot 4 194 23 95.9 90 7 7·3 6/10/81 Lot 4 194 18 100.7 95 7 74 6/10/81 Lot 4 196 13 107.3 94 5 ' 75 6/10/81 Lot 4 198 14 107.3 94 5 76 6/10/81 Lot 4 196 16 105.3 92 5 77 6/10/81 Lot 4 200 16 109.·1 92 8 78 6/10/81 Lot 4 198 16 109.5 92 8 79 6/101-81 Lot 4 190 14 109.2 92 8 Slope Area . ~o 6/11/81 Lot 1 230 17 104.9 91 5 Slope Area Notes: u "Compaction Curve No. 11 refers to Table B. Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. --218 TABLE A -S.UMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS. (ASTM 01556-64 and/or ASTM 02922-78, ASTM D3017 78) est ~o. Date of Test 31 32 33 34 15 16 37 18 l9 JO n n )3 )4 JS )6 )7 6./11/81 6/11/81 6/11/81 6/11/81 6/11/81 6/11/81 . 6/11/81 6/12/81 6/12/81 6/12/81 6/12/81 6/12/81 6/12/81 6/12/81 6/12/81 6/15/81 6/15/81 Lot 1 Lot 4 Lot 4 Lot 1 Lot .2 Lot 2 Lot 2 Lot 2 Lot 2 Lot 2 Lot 1 Lot 2 Lot 2 Lot 2 Lot 2 Lot 2 Lot 2 Test Locati.on Approximate .Water Dry Degree of Elevation Content Density Compaction Compaction (Feet) (%) (pcf) (%) Curve No. 234 200 193 233 236 238 240 242 242 244 243 246 245 249 251 250 252 18 17 18 18 18 20 17 15 16 14 14 14 16 14 15 15 15 107.7 104.8 101.2 104.9 109.8 109.7 107.3 107.5 108.7 102.5 107.3 ' 107 !.8 107.3 103.5 108. 7 107.3 106.4 94 91 95 92 95 96 93. 90 91 90 93 94 93 90 94 93 93 5 5 7 5 5 5 5 8 8 3 3 3 3 3 3 5 5 Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No.11 refers to Table B. 2) Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. Remarks Slope Area Slope Area Slope Area ,. ... 21, , ~ TABLE A -SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM D 1556-64 and/or ASTM D2922-78,. ASTM D3017-78) " Approximate Water Dry Degree of est Elevation Content Density Compaction Compaction No. Date of Test Test Location (Feet) (%) (pcf) _!%) Curve No. Remarks 98 6/15/81 Lot 2 253 15 108.1 94 5 99 6/15/81 Camino V Ida Robel 182 16. 104.1 90 4 West of Lot 4 00 6/15/81 Lot 5 222 17 105.6 91 4 )1 6/15/81 Lot 5 232 17 107.0 92 4 )2 6/15/81 Lot 2 248 16 107 .2 92 4 Slope Area )3 6/15/81 Lot 2 246 15 106.0 93 5 )4 6/15/81. Lo.t 2 251 17 107.7 94 5 Slope Area )5 6/15/81 Lot 2 249 16 107 .1 93 5 )6 6/16/81 Lot 17 166 18 100.8 96 7 Toe Key )7 6/16/81 Lot 17 168 15 96.2 91 7 Slope Area ' )8 6/ 16/81 Lot 17 163 17 108.5 94 5 )9 6/16/81 Lot 17 165 8 104.8 92 5 iO 6/16/81 Lot 2 248 16 107.0 93 5 11 6/16/81 Lot 2 253 14 108.5 95 5 i2 6/16/81 Lot 4 202 13 104.1 91 5 i3 6/16/81 Lot 4 200 10 101.2 94 5 Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No." refers to Table B~ 2) Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. r----_:; :::.-~-21E TABLE A -SUMMARY OF FIEl,..I) DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM 01556-64 and/or ASTM D2922-78, ASTM D3017-78) est ~o. Date of Test 14 15 16 17. 18 19 !O'• t1 !2 !3 !4 ts t6 !7 !8 !9 10 6/16/81 6/16/81 6/16/81 · 6/16/81 6/16/81 6/16/81 6/ 17/81 6/17/81 6/17/81 ·6/17/81 6/17/81 6/17/81 6/17/81 6/17/81 6/17/81 6/17/81 6/18/81 Test Location Camino Vida Roble West of Lot 4 Lot 17 Lot 17 Lot 17 Lot ·11 Lot 17 Lot 2 Lot 2 Lot 2 Lot 2 Lot 17 Lot 17 Lot 17 Lot 17 Lot 2 Lot 2 Lot 2 Approximate _Water Dry Degree of Ele_vatlon Content Density · Compaction Comp~ctfon (Feet) (%) (pcf) (%) Curve No. 184 170 172 174 176 176 250 254 254 256 176 178 176 178 252 254 256 23 11 13 12 11 13 15 16 16 15 16 15 16 16 16 16 16 99.8 104.6 105.3 106. 1 110 .• 9 108.9 106.8 106.6 109.5 110.2 1'11.9 110.6 109.0 112.2 108.4 110.2 110.3 87 91 92 92 97 95 93 90 92 93 94 93 92 94 92 93 93 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No." refers to Table B. 2) Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. Remarks Test failed., see #375 Slope Area Slope Area Slope Area Slope Area Slope Area Slope Area 21( TABLE A -SUMMARY OF FIELP Ol;NSrtY TEST RESULTS (ASTM 01556-64 and/or ASTM D2922-78, ASTM 03017-78) est No. Date of Test 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 qo fJ 1 lJ2 n ~4 ts 16 11 6/18/81 6/18/81 6/ 18/81 6/18/81 6/18/81 6/18/81 6/18/81 6/ 18/81 6/18/81 6/19/81 6/19/81 6/19/81 6/19/81 6/19/81 6/19/81 6/19/81 6/19/81 Test Location Lot 2 Approximate Elevation !Feet) Corte Del Abeto E. of Lot 5 Lot 2 256 261 258 172 174 178 '255 257 180 254 256 258 260 262 266 268 264 Lot 17 Lot 17 Lot 17 Lot i Lot 2 Lot 17 Lot 2 Lot 2 Lot 2 Lot 2 Lot 6 Lot 3 Lot 3 Lot 6 Water Dry Oegree of Content Density Compaction Compaction (%) (pcf) (%) Curve No. 16 14- 15 11 12 12 15 15 17 14 13 15 15 14 15 16 16 110.3 105.9 109.1 106,4 105.3 105.4 108.7 111.2 105.9 103.5 104.0 106.9 108.6 104.4 111.2 110.4 107.3 93 92 92 93 92 92 92 94 92 90 90 93 95 91 94 93 94 2 5 2 5 5 5 2 2 5 5 5 5 5 5 2 2 5 Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No. 11 refers to Table B. 2) Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. Remarks Slope Area Slope Area ,-.--2U TABLE A .,. SUMMARY· OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS ·(ASTM 01556-64 and/or ASTM 02922-78, ASTM 03017-78) :!St {2.!. Date of Test 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 l 6/22/81 6/22/81 6/22/81 6/22/81 6/22/81 6/22/81 6/22/81 6/23/81 6/23/81 6/23/81 6/23/81 6/23/81 6/23/81 6/23/81 6/24/81 6/24/81 6/24/81 Lot 17 Lot 3 Lot 4 Lot 4 Lot 4 Lot 4 Lot 4 Lot 5 Lot 5 Lot 5 Lot 5 Lot 5 Lot 5 Lot 5 Lot 5 Lot 5 Lot 5 Test Location Approximate Elevation {F~~t) 180 264 210 212 214 217 219 221 223 225 227 226 229 231 234 233 234 Water Dry Degree of Content Density Compaction Compaction (%) (pcf) (%) Curve No. 19 15 16 15 15 16 16 16 14 18 16 19 16 16 14 14 15 ·100.e 96.3 109.9 97.3 95.5 97.5 97.7 105.9 104.8 101.8 lq8.3 100.3 104.5 104.5 104.5 105.4 104.8 92 91 93 92 90 92 93 92 91 96 94 95 91 91 91 92 91 9 7 2 7 7 7 7 1 1 7 1 7 1 1 1 1 1 Notes: ~J "Compaction Curve No.11 refers to Table B. Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. Remarks Slope Area Slope Area Slope Area Slope Area Slope Area ......- 218-3D TABLE A -SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM D.1556-64 and/or ASTM D2922-78, ASTM D3017-78) - ~st ~o. Date of Test 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 i 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 6/24/81 6/25/81 6/25/81 6/25/81 6/25/81 6/25/81 6/26/81 6/26/81 6/26/81 6/26/81 6/26/81 6/26/81 6/26/81 6/26/81 6/26/81 6/26/81 6/26/81 Lot 5 Lot 11 Lot 11 Lot 11 Lot 11 Lot 11 Lot 4 Lot 10 Lot 10 Lot 4 Lot 4 Lot 11 Lot 11 Lot 10 Lot 11 Lot 11 Lot 11 Test Location Approximate · Elevation (Feet.) 236 164 166 168 170 172 203 172 170 206 208 174 176 168 176 178 180 Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No. 11 refers to Table B. Water Dry Degree of Content Density Compaction Compaction (%) (pcf) (%) Curve No. 15 27 27 15 16 27 15 12 13 11 13 20 14 20 21 21 14 107.3 97.9 97.3 104.8 104.4 . 100. 2 96.9 104.2 104.5 104.4 ' 105.1 96.6 104.4 98.3 95.4 94.6 104.8 93 91 91 91 90 94 91 90 90 91 91 90 90 91 89 88 91 1 10 10 3 3 10 10 1 1 1 1 10 1 10 10 10 1 2) Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. Remarks Slope Area Slope Area Slope Area Slope Area Slope Area Slope Area Test failed, see #285 Test failed, see #286 211s-jU TABLE A -SUMMARY. OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS. (ASTM D1556-64 and/or ASTM 02922-78, ASTM 03017-78) JSt ~o. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8: 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Date of Test 6/26/81 6/26/81 6/26/81 6/26/81 6/26/81 6/29/81 6/29/81 6/29/81 6/29/81 ·6/29/81 6/29/81 6/29/81 6/29/81 6/29/81 6/29/81 6/29/81 6/29/81 Lot 10 Lot 10 Lot 10 Lot 11 Lot 11 Lot 4 Lot 4 Lot 4 Lot 4 Lot 4 Lot 4 Lot 4 Lot 5 Lot 5 Lot 5 Lot 5 Lot 4 Test Location Approximate Elevation (Feet) 170 172 174 176 178 202 200 200 209 202 206 204 231 234 237 233 201 Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No.11 refers to Table a·. Water Dry Degree of Content Denslty Compaction Compaction (%) · (pcf) (%) Curve No. 22 15 16 21 .21 15 15 11 13 -15 13 11 11 12 12 14 10 96.0 107.0 107. 1 96.1 97.1 104.4 105.3 103.5 104.2 104.4 104.5 103.8 107.3 · 104. 2 105.6 105.9 104.4 90 90 90 90 91 91 91 90 91 91 91 90 90 91 92 92 91 10 2 2 10 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 2 1 1 1 1 2) Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. Remarks Slope Area Retest of #279 Retest of #280 Slope Ar:-ea " ___,,_ 21f --, TABLE A -SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM D1556-64 and/or ASTM 02922-781 ASTM D3017-78) est No. Date of Test 99 00 01 02 )3 )4 l5 )6 )7 )8 )9 10 i1 12 i3 i4 iS 6/29/81 6./29/81 6/29/81 6/30/81 6/30/81 6/30/81 6/30/81 6/30/81 6/30/81 6/30/81 6/30/81 6/30/81 6/30/81 · 6/30/81 6/30/81 7 /01/81 7/01/81 Lot 5 Lot 5 Lot 4 Lot 4 Lot 4 Lot 4 Lot 4 Lot 4 Lot 4 Lot 4 Lot 4 Lot 4 Lot 1 Lot 4 Lot 4 Lot 11 Lot 11 Test Location Approximate El~vatlon {fe~t) 235 232 203 205 206 203' 205 211 216 214 206 218 208 206 208 178 180 Water Dry De.gree of Content Density Compaction. Compc1ctlon (%) (pcfl _ {%) Curve No. 13 12 14 14 15 13 14 13 11 12 11 15 14 11 12 18 19 105.9 104.6 105.q 106.3 1Q5.0 105.6 106.4 105.1 104.7 106.0 \05.4 105.8 105.0 106.0 105.6 95.9 97.3 92 91 92 92 91 92 92· 91 91 92 92 92 91 92 92 90 91 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 10 Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No.11 refers to Table B. 2) Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. Remarks Slope Area Slope Area Slope Area Slope Area " "' 218 -- TABLE A -SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM 01556-64 and/or ASTM D2922-78, ASTM 03017-78) st :>. Date of Test 7/01/81 7/01/81 7/01/81 7/01/81 7/01/81 7 /01/81 7/01/81 7/01/81 7/01/81 7/01/81 7/01/81 7/01/81 7 /01/81 7/01/81' 7/01/81 Lot 10 Lot 10 Test Location Approximate Elevation (Feet) 176 '178 Storm Drain Trench Backfill FSG-21 Corte Del Nogal -Sta. 13+20 Storm Drain Trench Backfill FSG-21 Corte Del Nogal -Sta. 11+33 Embankment Lot 10 Lot 1 Lot 1 Lot 1 Lot 1 Lot 1 Lot 11 Lot 11 Lot 17 Lot 17 180 210 216 211 212 214 182 184 192 194 Storm Drain Trench Backfill Corte Del Nogal -Sta. 13+35 FSG-2' lotes: 1) "Compaction Curve No.11 refers to Table B. Water Dry Peg·ree of Content Density Compaction Compaction (%) . (pcf) (%) Curve No. 21 14 16 14 23 15 15 16 14 14 17 17 14 15 20 96.9 104.8 103.6 104.7 96.3 104.9 105.9 105.9 105.0 ' 105.2 103.7 104.2 104.8 104.9 94.4 90 91 90 91 90 92 92 92 91 91 90 91 91 92 90 10 1 5 5 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 7 2) 3) Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. "FSG" denotes finish subgrade e~evation. Remarks Slope Area Slope Area Slope Area ~ 21: TABLE A ... SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM D1556-64 and/or ASTM D2922-78, ASTM D3017-78) )St fo •. Date of Test 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 ;. I 7/01/81 7/01/81 7 /01/81 7/01/81 7/01/81 7/01/81 7 /01/81' 7 /01 /Q-1 7/01/81 7/01/81 7/01/81 7/01/81 7/02/81 7/02/81 7 /02/81 7/02/81 7/02/81 Test Location . Approximate Elevation {F~eU Corte Del Nogal -Sta. 12+70 FSG-21 Corte Del Nogal -Sta. 11+90 FSG-21 Corte Del Nogal -Sta. 10+70 FSG-21 Corte Del Abeto -Sta. 7+85 FSG-41 Corte Del Abeto -Sta. 6+05 FSG-41 Corte Del Abeto -Sta. 5+00 FSG-41 Corte Del. Abeto -Sta. 3+50 FSG-41 Corte Del. Abeto -Sta. 2+30 FSG-41 Corte Del Abeto -Sta. 1+45 FSG-41 Corte Del Abeto -Sta. 7+85 FSG-41 Corte Del Abeto -Sta. 6+05 FSG-41 Corte Del Abeto -Sta. 5+00 FSG-41 Corte Del Nogal -Sta. 13+50 FSG Corte Del Nogal -Sta. 12+10 FSG Corte Del Nogal -Sta. 11+00 FSG Embankment Lot 11 Lot 11 180 178 Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No.11 refers to Table B. Water Dry Degree of Content Density Compaction Compaction (%) (pcf) (%) Curve No. 16 21 17 17 19 15 13 15 13 17 19 17 13 15 13 8 11 95.6 94.6 96.3 90.1 91.1 89.7 103.3 104.5 102.6 97.4 f)4.5 96.2 101. 9 101.0 101.0 103.8 104.0 91 90 91 85 86 85 90 90 90 90 90 91 93 92 92 91 · 91 7 7 7 7 7 7 5 5 5 7 7 7 9 9 9 5 5 2) 3) Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. 11FSG11 denotes finish subgrade elevation. Remarks Test falled, see #340 Test failed, see #341 Test failed, see #342 Retest of #334 Retest of #335 Retest of #336 Slope Area Slope Area " 21-. -) TABLE A -SUMMARY· OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM 01556-64 and/or ASTM 02922-78, ASTM 03017-78) ~st ~o. Date of Test ~ . 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 s 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 7/02/81 7/02/81 7/02/81 7/02/81 7/02/81 7/02/81 7/02/81 7/02/81 7/02/81 7/02/81 7/02/81 7/02/81 7/02/81 7/02/81 7/02/81 7/03/81 Lot 10 Lot 10 Lot 11 Test Location Approximate Elevation {.F~~t) 176 178 182 Storm Drain Trench Backfill Corte Del Abeta -Sta. 7+00 FSG-21 Corte Del Abeta -Sta. 6+10 FSG-21 Corte Del Abeto -Sta. 5+50 FSG-2' Corte Del Abeto -Sta. 4+20 FSG-21 Corte Del Abeto -Sta. 3+20 FSG-21 Corte Del Abeto -Sta. 1+90 F SG-21 Embankment Lot 10 Lot 10 Lot 11 Lot 11 Lot 10 Lot 10 Lot 10 180 182 184 183 176 178 180 Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No.11 refers to Table B. Water Dry Degree of Content Density Compaction Compaction (%) (pcf) (%) Curve No. 12 14 12 19 15 15 12 12 17 14 14 12 10 12 12 14 104.4 104.0 104.5 99.3 101.6 99.9 101. 7 1()4.5 99.2 106.3 104.8 103.1 103.1 106.1 103.9 107.0 91 91 91 93 95 93 95 98 93 92 91 90 90 92 91 93 5 s 5 10 10 10 10 10 10 1 1 5 5 5 5 3 2) 3) Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. 11 FSG" denotes finish subgrade elevation. Remarks Slope Area Slope Area Slope Area Slope Area Slope Area Slope Area Slope Area Slope Area Slope Area 211 TABLE A -SUMMARY OF FIELD DENS.ITV TEST RESULTS~ (ASTM D1556~64 and/or ASTM D2922-78, ASTM D3017-7~) Approximate Water Dry D.egree of est Elevation Content Densl'ty Compaction Comp~ction No. Date of Test Test Location (Feet) (%) (pcf) . _!%) Curve No. Remarks · 64 7/03/81 Lot 10 182 14 '104.6 91 1 Slope Area 65 71'03/81 Lot 11 176 15 104.5 91 1 Slope Area 66 7/03/81 Lot 11 178 13 103.8 90 1 Slope Area 67 7/03/81 Lot 17 184 15 " 104.7 91 ·1 68 7/03/81 Lot 17 186 15 105.2 . 92 1 69 7/03/81 Lot 17 184 15 104.8 91 1 70 7/03/81 Lot 1 200 14 104. 1 91 . 1 Slope Area 1'1 7/03/81 Lo"t 1 186 15 103. l 90 5 Slope Area 72 7/03/81 Lot 1 188 14 105.2 92 5 Slope Area 73 7/03/81 Lot 10 184 16 105.4 92 5 74 7/03/81 Lot 10 · 186 15 105.4 92 5 ' 75 7/03/81 Camino Vida Roble 184 16 105.2 92 5 Retest of #214 West of Lot 4 76 7/03/81 Camino Vida Roble 186 11 103.6 90 5 West of Lot 4 77 7/03/81 Camino Vida Roble 176 12 104.2 91 5 West of Lot 4 78 7/03/81 Camino Vida Roble 178 11 104.6 91 5 West of Lot 4 Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No. 11 refers to Table B. 2) Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. 211 TABLE A -SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS. {ASTM D1556-64 and/or ASTM D2922-78, ASTM D3017-78} Approximate .Water Dry Degree of est Elevation Content Density Compaction Compaction i2.:_ Date of Test Test Location ( Feet) {%} (pcf} (%) Curve No. 19 w ll 12 :3 ,4 is ;6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 7/06/81 7 /06/8'1 7/06/81 7/06/81 7/06/81 7 /06/8.1 7/06/81 7/06/81 7/06/81 7/06/81 7/06/81 7/06/81 7/06/81 7/06/81 7/06/81 7/06/81 Lot 11 ' Lot 11 Lot 10 Lot 10 Lot .11 Lot 11 Lot 10 Lot 10 Tract 80-33 -Embankment Lot 8 Lot 8 Lot 4 Lot 4 Lot 5 Lot 5 Lot 8 Lot 7 192 192 176 179 178 180 184 18, 233 11 11 13 13 12 12 12 11 10 231 (FSG) 12 194 11 195 (FSG) 11 . 204 12 204 (FSG) 12 233 (FSG) 10 220 13 101.a 104.6 105.2 106.2 105.1 105.6 106.5 104.6 104.8 1,os. 1 106.4 105.0 106.3 105.1 105.3 104.5 Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No.11 refers to Table B. 2) Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. 3) "FSG" denotes finish subgrade elevation. 96 91 91 93 92 92 93 91 91 92 93 91 92 91 91 91 7 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Remarks Slope Area Slope Area ~st ~o. !5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2 lt. .,..; TABLE A -SUMMARY OF FIELD D'ENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM D1556-64 and/or ASTM D2922-78, ASTM D3017-78) ' " Date of Test 7/07/81 7/07/81 7/07/81 7/07/81 7/07/81 7/07/81 7/07/81 7/07/81 7/07/81 7/07/81 7/07/81 7/07/81 7/07/81 7/07/81 7/08/81 Test Location Tract 80-34 -Embankment Lot 10 Lot 10 Lot 10 Lot 10 Approximate Elevation Cf~~o 182 184 188 182 Storm Drain Trench Backfill Corte Del Abeto -Sta. 2+80 FSG Corte Del Abeto -Sta. 5+20 FSG Corte Del Abeta -Sta. 6+70 FSG Embankment Lot 11 Lot 11 Lot 10 Lot 11 Lot 11 Lot 10 Lot 10 Lot 11 194 196 190 182 184 184 186 188 Water Dry Degree ·Of Content Density Compaction Compaction (%) (pcf) (%) Curve No. 15 16 14 15 14 13 15 15 17 13 15 JS 13 13 10 104.7 l06.1 104.7 105.7 104.6 103.9 103.6 104.2 106.1 103.8 104.5 104.2 103.2 104.8 104.5 91 93 91 92 91 90 90 91 93 91 91 91 90 91 91 5 5 5 5 3 3 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Remarks Slope Area Slope Area Notes: 1) 11 Compaction Curve No. 11 refers to Table B. 2) 3) Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. 11FSG11 denotes finish subgrade elevation. 21l TABLE A -SUMMARY. OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS .(ASTM D1556-64 and/or ASTM D2922-78, A.STM D3017-78) Water Dry Degree of =St Content Density Compaction Compaction !o. Date of Test Test Location Approximate Elevation (F~eU (%) . (pcf) (%) Curve No. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 :) 1 ~ i 7/08/81 7/08/81 7/08/81 7/08/81 7/08/81 '7/08/81 7/08/81 7/08/81 7/08/81 7/08/81 7/08/81 7/08/81 7/08/81 7/08/81 Lot 11 Lot 11 Lot 10 Lot 10 Lot 10 Tract 80-33 -Embankment Lot l Lot 1 Lot 3 Lot 3 Lot 2 Lot 2 Tract 80-34 -Embankment Lot 11 Lot 11 Tract 80-33 -Embankment Lot 4 190 192 184 186 188 10 12 12 13 15 204 (FSG) 12 207 (FSG) 12 205 (FSG) 13 208 (FSG) 13 22i ( FSG) 14 218 (FSG) 14 196 192 11 13 196 (FSG) 12 105.S 105.9 105.2 104.8 105.0 106.4 105.7 106.·3 105.2 106.1 ' 106.3 104.0 104.3 105.7 ~otes: 1) "Compaction Curve No. 11 refers to Table B. 2) 3) Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. "FSG" denotes finish subgrade elevation. 92 92 92 91 92 93 92 92 92 93 93 91 91 92 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Remarks Slope Area 2H TABLE A -SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM D1556-64 and/or ASTM D2922-78, ASTM D3017-78) Water Dry Degree of -st Content Density Compaction Compaction 10. Date of Test Test Location Approximate Elevation (F~e!) (%) (pcf) (%) Curve No. 4. 5 6 1 3 ~ :, 1 ~ 3 •• J I l. 7/08/81 7/08/81 7/09/81 7/09/81 7/09/81 7/09/81 7/09/81 7/09/81 7/09/81 7/09/81 7/09/81 7/09/81 7/10/81 7/10/81 7/10/81 Lot 4 Lot 5 197 (FSG) 11 Tract 80-34 -Embankment Lot 11 Lot 11 Lot 11 Lot 10 Lot 10 Lot 10 Lot 11. Lot 11 Lot 11 Lot 11 Waterline Trench Backfill 204 208 210 212 186 186 188 194 193 194 192 Corte Del Abeto -Sta. 5+40 FSG-21 Corte Del Abeto -Sta. 3+20 FSG-21 Corte Del Nogal -Sta. 13+30 FSG-21 10 11 11 14 9 9 12 14 12 .10 11 17 14 14 106.1 104.7 109.8 109. 1 . 108.1 101.4 100.6 105.7 103.7 1Q4.8 104.9 105.1 99.1 103.2 103.5 ~otes: 1) 11 Compactlon Curve No." refers to Table B. 2) 3) Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. "FSG" denotes finish subgrade elevation. 93 91 93 92 91 88 88 92 91 91 91 91 90 90 90 5 5 2 2 2 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 9 3 3 Remarks Sl<>pe Area Slope Area .Slope Area Test failed, ~ee #440 Test failed, see #441 211, JI.I . TABLE A -SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM 01556-64 and/or ASTM 02922-78, ASTM D3017-78l Approximate Water Dry Degree of est Elevatlon Content Density Compaction Compaction No. Date of Test Test Location _ (Feet) (%) -1J!cf) -_ (%) Curve No. Remarks Palomar A'lrport Road Widening -North Side 8/03/81 Station 146+20· 178 15 106.5 90 8 8/03/81 Station 14'HOO 178-13 107.4 91 8 8./03/81 Station 145+50 180 16 104.0 91 5 8/03/81 Station 144+80 180 17 106.5 93 5 8/04/81 Station 145+80 182 13 101' •. 6 93 9 8/04/81 Station 144+50 182 13 100.3 92 9 8/04/81 Station 146+40 184 14 99.7 91 9 8/04/81 Station 144+70 184 11 104.7 92 5 . 8/04/81 Station 147+00 186 10 104.9 92 5 0 8/04/81 Station 145+20 186 13 106.6 93 5 1 8/05/81 Station 1116+80 188 13 103.5 90 5 l 8/05/81 Station 1115+00 188 13 1011.8 92 5 3 8/05/81 Station 1114+30 185 111 105.6 92 5 Storm Drain Trench Backfill . I 8/05/81 Station 144+30 187 11 106.-6 93 5 Embankment ; 8/06/81 Station 146+10 192 11 106.0 93 5 Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No.11 refers to Table B. 2) Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. 218-3D ' TABLE A -SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RES UL TS (ASTM D1556-6q and/or ASTM D2922-78i ASTM D3017-78} I Approximate . Water Dry Degree of -est Elevation Content Density Compaction Compaction No. Date of Test -Test Location (Feet) (%} __lee{) -(%} Curve No. Remarks •"'-! -.- 6 8/06/81 Station 1q1+00 194 17 103.1 94 9 7 8/06/81 Station 146+60 196 13 . 101.9, 93 9 ·8 8/06/81 Station 144+70 196 13 102.9 94 9 9 8/06/81 Station 142+80 190 15 . 101.4 94 9 0 8/06/81 Station 142+50 192 13 103.2 94 9 1 8/06/81 Station 143+90 184 15 101.3 93 9 2. . 8/07/81 Station 146+70 20() 12 104.1 91 5 3 8/07/81 Station 145+70 202 12 104.5 91 $ Structural Section 4 8/10/81 Station 145+90 FSG 12 105.5 92 5 5 8/10/81 Station 145+50 FSG 15 105.3 92 5 • 6 8/10/81 Station 145+20 FSG 14 104.9 92 5 7 9/15/81 Station 147+00 FSG 12 104.2 95 9 8 9/15/81 Station 146+10 FSG 13 106.5 97 9 9 9/15/81 Station 144+50 FSG '13 107.1 gq 5 Test failed, ---see #31 0 9/15/81 Station 1'13+50 FSG 11 108.5 95 5 1 9/15/81 Station 14lf+50. FSG 13 109.0 95 5 Retest of 129 2 9/ 17 /81 · Station 146+50 F~G 5 131.4 95 11 Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No." refers to Table B. 2} Unless otherwise noted elevations· shown are to nearest foot.· 3) '"FSG11 denotes finish subgrade-elevatlon. q) "FBG11 denotes finls~_h!)se ffrade el~Vit!i<>fl~ '--~~-~ :---218-,jU TABLE A -SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM 01556-64 and/or ASTM 02922-78, ASTM 03017-78) Approximate W~ter Dry est Elevation C:on~ent Density No. Date of Test Test Location (F~et) (%) (pcf) .._.,.. ; ~ N.., ~ ,,_.,,.._~.~~~ ~,-, " • ~ • .,.., .. ~J , \ ... .. 3 9/17/81 Station 145+50 FBG 6 132.5 ' 9/17/81 Station 1114+60 FBG ,. 132.2 5 9/17/81 Station 11J3+30 FBG 4 132.2 Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No.11 refers to Table B. 2) 3) Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. "FBG" denotes finish base grade elevation. Degree of Compaction · Compaction ~(%) Curve No. Remarks 95 11 95 11 95 11 !St 218-3D TABLE A -SUMMARY _OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM 01556-64-and/or ASTM 02922-78, ASTM 03017-78) Approximate Water Dry Degree of Elevation Content Density Compaction Compaction lo. Date of Test Test Location (Feet) (%) (pcf) (%) Curve No. Remarks 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 5· 7 B 9 0 1 z 3 ' 7/10/81 7/10/81 7/10/81 7/10/81 7/10/81 '7 / 10/81 7/10/81 7/10/81 7/10/81 7/10/81 7/10/81 7/10/81 7/10/81· 7 / 13/81 7 / 13/81 7/13/81 Corte Del Nogal -Sta. 11+80 FSG-21 Embankment Lot 10 Lot 10 Lot 11 Lot n Lot 11 Lot 11 Waterline Trench Backfill ' 186 186 214 216 219 221 Corte Del Abeto -Sta. 7+30 FSG Corte Del Abeto -Sta. 4+20 FSG Corte Del Abeto -Sta. 12+80 FSG Corte Del Abeto -Sta. 10+90 FSG Embanl<ment Lot 11 Lot 7 Lot 7 Lot 7 Lot 11 224 226 228 · ·230 196 Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No.11 refers to Table B. · 15 14 15 9 13 13. 14 18 20 18 18 16 16 12 13 10 -~ .,: ,,,,, 103.3 105.1 104.0 106.3 104.1 105.7 106.4 98.0 100.2 ' 101.4 99.3 107.3 105.1 105.S 107.2 105.2 2) Unless otherwise noterl elevations shown are to near~i;t f<lot. 90 92 91 93 91 92 92 90 91 93 90 93 92 92 94 92 !!!':11-_ .. .,.f. 3 5 5 5 ·5 5 5 9 9 9 9 5 5 5 5 5 Retest of 1429 Retest of 11130 Slope Area Slope Area Slope Area SIQpe Area Slope Area -------~· --··-·-. -··~ 218 TABLE A -SUMMARY OF f:IE!:-D DENSITY TEST RESULTS IASTM D1556-64 and/or ASTM D2922-78 1 ASTM D3017-78) Approximate Water Dry De~ree of !St Elevation Content Density Compaction Compaction t2.:. Date of Test Test Location (Feet) {%) _!ecf}_ ~(%) Curve No. Remarks . 5 7/13/81 Lot 11 198 11 105.4 92 5 6 7/13/81 Lot 10 188 14 105.7 92 5 7 7/13/81 Lot 10 190 13 105.2 92 5 8 7/13/81 Lot 10 191 11 104.1 91 5 Tract 80-33 -Sewerllne Trench Back fill 9 7/13/81 Las Palmas Dr. -Sta. 23+00 FSG-81 . 14 103.7 91 5 0 7/13/81 Las Palmas Dr. -Sta. 21+00 FSG-81. 16 104.0 91 5 1 7/13181 Las Palmas Dr. -Sta. 23+00 FSG-6' 10 104.6 91 5 2 7/13/81 Las Palmas Dr. -Sta. 20+25 FSG-51 10 104.1 91 5 3 7/13/81 Las Palmas Dr. -Sta. 17+80 FSG-61 12 105.0 92 5 II 7/13/81 Las Palmas Dr. -Sta. 22+50 FSG-61 13 1d5.s 92 5 5 7/13/81 Las Palmas Dr. -Sta. 19+50 FSG-4' 10 103.3 90 5 6 7/13/81 Las Palmas Dr. -Sta. 20+75 FSG-41 10 102.8 90 5 7 7/13/81 Las Palmas Dr. -Sta. 22+60 FSG-41 14 104.2 91 5 B 7/14/81 Las Palmas Dr. -Sta. 22+00 FSG-21 9 104.2 91 5 i. 7/14/81 Las Palmas Dr. -Sta. 18+70 FSG-21 12 103.4 90 5 [) 7/14/81 Las Palmas Dr. -Sta. 19+20 FSG 15 105.0 92 5 Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No." refers to Table B. 2) Unless otherwise noted elevatlons shown are to nearest foot. 3) 11FSG11 denotes finish subgrade elevatlon. 211,-.>LJ . TABLE A -SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM D1556-64 and/or ASTM 02922-70, ASTM D3017-78) !St fo. Date of Test -. ·1 ·2 '3 4 5 '6 '7 ·a- '9 0 ,1 2 3 ;4 7/14/81 7 / 1'4/81 7/14/81 7/14/81 7/14/81 ·1 I 14/81 7/14/81 7/14/81 7/14/81 7/15/81 7/15/81 7/15/81 7/15/81 7/15/81 Test Location Approximate Elevation (F~~!) Water Dry ' Degree of Cont~nt Density Compaction Compaction (%) (pcf) (%) Curve No. Las Palmas Dr. -Sta. 16+20 FSG 15 105.6 92 5 Embankment Lot 4 Lot 4 Lot 5 Lot 7 Lot 2 Lot 2 Tract 80-34 -Embankment Lot 7 Lot 7 Tract 80-33 -Sewerllne Trench Backfill Lot 4 Lot 2 Lot 3 Lot 5 Tract 80-34 -Storm Drain Trench Back fill Lot 17 196 (FSG) 9 195 (FSG) 10 · .. 205 (FSG) 11 222 (FSCi) 11 218 (FSG) 11 221 (FSG) 12 232 234 FSG-4' FSG-41 FSG-21 FSG-21 FSG-311 14 14 14 16 . 16 15 11 105.0 105.3 105.l 104.4 106.6 105.4 105.1 106.5 103.8 103.9 103.7 102.9 104.8 92 92 92 91 93 92 92 93 91 91 91 90 92 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 3 3 3 5 Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No.11 refers .to Table B.· 2) Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. Remarks 218-30 . TABLE A -SUMMAR_Y OF FIELll DENSITY TEST RESULTS {ASTM D1556-64 and/or ASTM D2922-78i ASTM 1>3017-711) Approximate Water Dry D~gree of est Elevation Content Density Compaction Comp~ctlon No. Date of Test Test location (Feet) (%) _!e~fl _ -J\) Curve No. Remarks - 15 7/15/81 Lot 17 FSG:..291 11 104.7 91 5 16 7/15/81 lot 17 FSG-261 10 104.2 91 5 17 7/15/81 Lot 17 FSG-241 14 1011.6 91 5 Embankment 18 7/15/81 Camino Vida Roble 180 12 96.3 91 7 West of Lot 4 19 7/15/81 Camino Vida Roble 182 14 96.6 92 7 West of Lot 4 10 7/15/81 Camino Vida Roble 1811 111 96.1 91 7 West of Lot 4 t;1 7/15/81 Camino Vida Roble 180 15 96.6 92 7 West of Lot 4 Storm Drain Trench Backfill ·2 7/16/81 lot 17 FSG-261 13 103.7 91 5 3 7/16/81 lot 17 FSG-241 16 96.9 92 7 q 7/16/81 Lot 17 FSG-221 1'1 98.3 93 7 5 7/16/81 lot 17 FSG-201 16 97.8 92 7 6 7/16/81 Lot 17 FSG-221 . 1 q 103.7 91 5 7 7/16/81 Lot 17 FSG-201 13 104.2 91 5 8 7/16/81 Lot 17 ··· FSG-181 15 1011.1 91 5 9 7/16/81 Lot 17 FSG-181 16 103.ll 90 5 Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No.11 refers to Table B. 2) Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. ZlB " TABLE A -SUMMARY ·OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM D1556-64 and/or ASTM D2922-78, ASTM 03017-78) ~st !!!.:_ Date of Test 0 ~ :, 3 ,. 5. 6. 7 8 9 0 1 2 7/17/81 7/17/81 1 I 11 /81 7/17/81 7/17/81 7/17/81 7/17/81 7/17/81 7/20/81 7/20/81 7/20/81 7/20/81 7/20/81 Test Location Embankment Lot 17 Lot 17 Lot 17 Lot 17 Lot 17 Lot 17 Approximate Elevation (Fe~H 176 178 180 182 184 186 Tract 80-33 -Sewer Lateral Trench Backfill Lot 4 Lot 6 Storm Drain Trench Backfill FSG FSG Las Palmas Dr. -Sta. 22+00 FSG-31 Las Palmas Dr. -Sta. 19+00 FSG-31 Las Palmas Dr. -Sta. 20+50 FSG-21 Las Palma~ Dr. -Sta. 22+00 FSG-11 Tract 80-34 -Embankment Lot 17 .186 Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No. 11 refers to Table B. Water Dry Degree of Content Density Compaction Compaction (%) (pc~) (%) ,,... Curve No. ,' ! • • ')-~ 1 I ' -~ :;. '~f ~ • '• •• ' • 13 l3 11 11 15 15 13 12 17 18 19- 19 13 103.5 103.8 105.2 104.7 103.4 103.9 104.0 104.0 98.9 99.5 96.7 96.5 · 105.1 90 91 92 91 90 91 91 91 90 91 88 88 91 ·5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 9 9 9 9 1 2) 3) Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. "FSG" denotes finish subgrade elevation. Remarks ·ff',', ... ,':,~-V'{"' '• ·,-'<;t.,.-,u,.,~,.~~~, Test failed, see #516 Test failed, see #517 218 TABLE A -SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM. 01556-64 and/or ASTM 02922-781 ASTM D3017-78) .~ Approximate Water· Dry Degree of ist Elevation Content Density Compaction Compaction o. Date of Test Test Location (Feet) (%l (ecf) (%) Curve No. Remarks ., _,,, •:,:,1-:t• • ';'. ·1,.;,y~ _,z.t,-;i... -"}''t\ .• '~ ··,,).-~ ,, 3 7/20/81 Lot 17 186 15 107.7 94 1 ' 7/20/81 lot 17 188 14 105.2 92 1 5 7/20/81 Lot 17 190 11 105.7 92 . 1 Tract 80-33 -Storm Drain Trench Back fill 5 7 /21/81 Las Palmas Dr. -Sta. 20+50 FSG-21 • 16 100.7 92 9 Retest of 1510 7 7/21/81' Las Palmas Dr. -Sta. 22+00 FSG-11 18 100.3 92 9 Retest -of 1511 Tr,act 80-311 -Embankment I 7/21/81 LQt 11 196 13 103.8 91 5 J 7/21/81 Lot 11 196 15 104.9 92 5 Tract 80-33 -Storm Drain Trench Backfill ) 7/2H81 Las Palmas Dr. -Sta. 17+50 FSG-31 11 103.6 91 5 I 7/2J/81 Las Palmas Dr. -Sta. 16+40 FSG-31 11·· 103.7 91 5 l 7/21/81 Las Palmas Dr. -Sta. 18+50 FSG-21 14 103.6 91 5 I 7/21/81 Las Palmas Dr. -Sta. 16+80 FSG-11 15 105.3 92 5 Tract 80-34 -Embankment I 7/22/81 Lot 11 198 15 105.3 92 . 5 Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No." refers to Table B. .. 2) Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to near,st foot. 3) "F SG11 denotes finish sub grade elevation. :st lo. - 5 6 7 B 9 I) 1 z 3 I ; 218 / TABLE A -SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM D1556-6'4 and/or ASTM D2922-78, ASTM D3017-78) Date of Test 7/22/81 7/22/81 7/22/81 7/22/81 7/22/81 7/23/81 7/23/81 7 /23/'81 7/23/81 7/23/81 7/23/81 7/23/81 7/23/81 7/24/81 Lot 11 Lot 17 Lot 17 Test Location Camino Vida Roble West of Lot 4 Camino Vida Roble West of Lot 4 Lot 10 Lot 10 Lot 11 Lot 11 Lot 11 Tract 80-33 -Storm Drain Trench 8 ack fill Approximate Elevation <f~~u 198 190 190 186 186 192 194 202 198 200 Las Palmas Dr.· -Sta. 22+30 FSG Las Palmas Dr. -Sta. 20+00 FSG Las Palmas Dr. -Sta. 17+70 fSG Tract 80-34 -Embankment Water Dry Degree of . Conte·nt Density Compaction Compaction (%) (ecf) (%) Curve No. 14 15 14 12 12 12 12 12 14 12 15 13 1'4 , • :. , • :,1 ' ., ... ~. 104.9 106.6 106.3 111.a 111.2 105.0 104.3 106.2 105.7 1qs.1 105.9 105.6 105.0 92 93 93 94 94 92 91 93 92 92 92 92 92 5 5 5 8 8 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Lot 6 266 (FSG) 8 ·106.4 93 5 Remarks iotes: 1) ncompactlon Curve No. 11 refers to Table 8 .. 2) Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. 3) 11 FSG11 denotes finish subgrade elevation. ·est No. - 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 q& 117 48 119 50 51 52 i3 ;q ;s 21: J ,. TABLE A -SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM D1556-61J and/or ASTM D2922-18, ASTM 03017-78) Date of Test 7/24/81 7/21J/81 7/24/81 7/24/81 7/24/81 7/27 /81 7/27/81 7/27/81 7/27/8.1 7/27/81 7/27/81 7/27/81 7/28/81 7/28/81 7/28/81 7 /28/8·1 7/28/81 Lot 6 Lot 3 Lot 2 Lot 2 Lot 2 Lot 17 Lot 17 Lot 4 Lot 4 Lot 17 Lot 17 Lot 17 Lot 1 Lot 1 Lot 17 Lot 17 Lot 1 Test Location Water Dry Degree of Approximate Elevation (Feet) Content Density Compaction Compaction (%) (pcf) (%) Curve No. 264 (FSG) 8 270 (FSG) 10 258 .(FSG) 8 256 (FSG) 8 260 (FSG) 9 • 192 19 192 16 204 11 206 12 194 17 194 13 196 17 202 204 198 198 206 16 15 14 13 12 105.7 104.9 105.8 105.6 106.2 101-.0 104.7 105.7 105.7 103.7 1,04.9 107.5 106.7 106. 1 104.9 105.0 104.9 92 92 92 92 93 93 91 92 92 91 92 94 93 93 92 92 92 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Remarks Slope Area Slope Area Slope Area Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No. 11 refers to Table B. . Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to neafest foot. 11FSG11 denotes finish subgrade elevation. 2) 3) 218-~u ,. TABLE A -SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM __ D1556-61f _and/or ASTM __ D2922-78t _ASTM D3017-781 . Approximate Water Dry Degree of 1st Elevation Content Density Compaction Compaction lo. Date of Test Test Location (Feet) -(%) (pc~) _(%) Curve No. Remarks ' ' '• ~"' : 6 7/28/81 Lot 1 206 l3 1()4.7 .92 5 Slope Area Waterline_ Trench Backfill' 7 7/29/81 Camino Vida Roble FSG-21 15 103~0 90 5 Station 27+00 8 ·7/29/81 Camino Vida Roble FSG,-21 11 103.1 90 5, Station 29+00 9 7/29/81 Camino Vida Roble FSG-21 16 103.5 90 5 Station 31+00 0 7/29/81 Camino Vida Roble FSG 12 103.4 90 5 Station 26+00 1 7/29/81 Camino Vida Roble FSG 16 105.2 92 5 Station 30+00 Embankment 2 7/29/81 Lot 1 208 12 1c>5.2 92 5 Slope Area Box Culvert Back flll 3 7/29/81 Corte Del Abeto 183 18 98.9 90 9 4 7/29/81 Corte Del Abeto 185 21 98.2 90 9 5 7/29/81 Corte Del Abeto 185 21 98.8 90 9 6 7/29/81 Corte Del Abeto 187 18 99.4 91 9 7 7/30/81 Corte Del Abeto 189 20 . 100. 2 91 9 I 8 7/30/81 Corte Del Abeto 189 19' 100.4 92 9 Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No." refers to Table B. . 2) Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. 3l 11FSG11 denotes finish s11h<1ra<fe eJ~vntion. 21 , TABLE A -SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM D1556-64 and/or ASTM D2922-78 1 ASTM D3017-78,.) Water · Dry Degree of est Content Density Compaction Compaction No. Date of Test Test Location Approximate Elevation (f:~eO (%) (pcf) (%) Curve No. - 69 ' 70 71 ,2 13 r4 ,s 76 '7 '8 rg 10 11 12 7/30/81 7/30/81 7/31/81 7 /31/81 7 /31/81 7/31/81 8/05/81 8/05/81 8/05/81 8/05/81 8/05/81 8/06/81 8/06/81 8/06/81 Embankment Lot 5 Lot 5 Tract 80-33 -Waterline Trench Back flll 235 238 14 13 Las Pal mas Dr. -Sta. 22+50 FSG-21 14 16 15 14 Las Palmas Dr. -Sta. 18+80 FSG-21 · Las Palmas Dr. -Sta. 20+40 FSG Las Palmas Dr. -Sta. 23+40 FSG Tract 80-34 -Embankment Lot 11 Lot 11 Lot 10 Lot 10 Lot 7 Electric Trench Backfill Lot 12 Lot 7 Lot 6 200 (FSG) 15 199 (FSG) 13 191 (FSG) 15 192 (FSG) 12 226 (FSG) 17 FSG-11 FSG-11 FSG-11 12 13 12 106.9 105.7 104.6 104-.4 105.0 104.7 103.9 1,05. 7 105.5 104.9 106.6 107.0 106.1 105.7 Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No.11 refers to Table B. 2) Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to ne·arest foot. 3) "FSG11 denotes finish subgrade elevation. 93 92 91 91 92 91 91 92 92 92 93 94 93 92 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Remarks ~-··-.. ,-2111-:u> TABLE A -SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (6SJM D1556-64 and/or ASTM D2922--78, ASTM 03017-78) ,. Approximate Water Dry D~gree of . est Elev at Ion Content .Density. Compaction Compaction No. Date of Test Test Location (Feet) (.%) --1.e!:0 _ _ _(%) Curve No. Remarks - Embankment 83 8/07/81 Lot 1 210 14 104.5 91 5 84 8/07/81 Lot 1 210 14 105.5 92 5 85 8/07/81 Lot 1 203 12· 106.3 93 5 Slope Area 86 8/07/81 Lot 1 205 15 105.6 92 5 Slope Area 17 8/07/81 Lot 1 • 207 11 104.7 92 5 Box Culvert Backfill 118 8/13/81 Corte Del Abeto 183 ·1s 102.9 90 3 19 8/13/81 Corte Del Abeto 185 16 103.4 90 3 io 8/ 13/81 Corte Del Abeto 187 13 103.1 90 3 n 8/13/81 Corte Del Abeto 189 12 104.7 91 3 • •2 8/13/81 Corte Del Abeto 190 13 104.6 91 3 Tract 80-33 -Storm Drain Trench Backfill .3 8/13/81 Lot 8 FSG-41 18 ·90.0 79 3 ·Test failed, see #594 t4 8/14/81 Lot 8 FSG-41 13 l0lf.9 92 3 Retest of #593 . 15 8/14/81 Lot 8 FSG-41 12 10lf.3 91 3 16 8/14/81 Lot 8 FSG-21 13 . 105.5 92 3 ' 17 8/14/81 Lot 8 FSG-21 14 105.9 93 3 Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No." refers to Table B. 2) Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. 3) "FSG11 denotes finish subgrade elevation. li ·est No. - 98 99 00 01 02 0'3 ~4 1)5 )6 21 ) TABLE A -SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY. TEST RESULTS (ASTM 01556-64 and/or AS"'fM 02922-781 ASTM D3017-78_) Date of Test 8/14/81 8/14/81 8/18/81 8/18/81 8/18/81 8/18/81 8/18/81 8/18/81 8/18/81 Test Location Tract 80-34 -Embankment Lot 5 Lot 5 Sewerllne Trench Backfill Corte .Del Abeto Station 10+00 Corte Del Abeto Station 11+50 Corte Del Abeto Station 9+25 Corte Del Abeto Station 11+00 Tract 80-33 -Storm Drain Trench Back fill Lot 8 Lot 8 Tract 80-34 -Sewerllne Trench Backfill Corte Del Abeto Station 10+25 Water Dry Degree of Approximate Elevation (Feet>, .. Content Density Compaction Compaction (%) (pcf) (%) Curve No. 234 (FSG) 15 235 (FSG) 13 FSG-41 FSG-41 FSG-21 FSG-21 FSG FSG FSG 14 15 13 14 l.2 14 10 104.6 104.8 96.6 96.6 96.7 96.7 fo5.8 105.8 103.7 91 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 90 3 3 7 7 7 7 1 1 1 Remarks Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No." refers to Table B. 2) Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. 3) "FSG" denotes finish subgrade elevation. !St 2111-JU TABLE A -SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RE SUL TS~ (ASTM D1556-64 and/or ASTM D2922-78, ASTM D3017-78) ,.. Approximate Water Dry ' Degre~ of Elevation Cont~nt Density Compaction Compaction lo. Date of Test Test Location (Feet) (%) (pcf) (%) Curve· No. Remarks 7 ·a 9 Q 1 2 3 ,. ·s 6 r B 8/18/81 8/19/81 8/19/81 8/26/81 8/26/81 8/27/81 8/27/81 8/27/81 8/28/81 8/28/81 . 8/28/81 8/28/81 Corte Del Abeto Station 11+50 Waterline Trench Backfill Corte Del Abeto Station 0+90 Corte Del Abeto Station 0+50 Embankment Lot 4 Lot 4 Lot 1 · ·Lot 1 Lot 1 Sewerllne Trench Backfill Camino Vida Roble Station 40+25 Camino Vida Roble Station 39+00 Camino Vida Roble Station '13+00 Camino Vida Roble Station '10+00 FSG 10 FSG 14 FSG-11 14 205 (FSG) 11 205 (FSG) 12 210 (FSG) 14 211 (FSG) 1'1 209 15 FSG-'11 8 FSG-61 12 FSG-21 15 · FSG-21 1'1 10&.q 105.4 105.0 107.0 106.5 105.1 104.8 185.6 107.0 105.3 104.6 103.2 Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No." refers to Table B. 2) Unless otherwise noted elevatlon_s shown are to nearest foot. 3) "FSG11 denotes finish subgrade elevation. 93 92 91 93 93 92 92 92 93 92 91 90 1 1 1 1 1 5 5 5 1 1 1 1 Slope Area ---.. '" _,.. .. .... . 218-3D TABLE A -SUMMARY OF. FIELD DENSITY _!EST RESULTS (ASJ"M D15~6-64 and/or ASTM D2922-78, ,Approximate Water Dry Degree of st Elevation Content· Density Compaction Compaction 2.:.. Date of Test Test Location · LF~et'). ~-:J'! .Jecfl --1i1 Curve No. Remarks •• 8/28/81 Camino Vida Roble FSG-41 10 104.6 9l 1 Station 38+50 ) IJ/28/81 Camino Vida Roble FSG-:-21 12 104.1 91 1 Station 45+00 8/28/81 Corte Del Nogal -Sta. 4+00 FSG-31 12 105.2 9~ 1 t 8/28/81 Corte Del Nogal -Sta. 2+20 FSG-21 • 15 103.0 90 1 . I 8/31/81 Camino Vida Roble FSG-31 15 103.7 91 5 Station 47+20 8/31/81 Camino Vida Roble FSG-21 16 105.1 92 5 Station 44+00 8/31/81 Camino Vida Roble FSG-31 13 104.5 91 5 Station 38+00 8/31/81 Camino Vida Roble FSG-21 13 lO!f.3 91 s Station 41+50 8/31/81 Camino Vida Roble FSG-11 16 103.8 91 s Station 47+00 8/31/81 Camino Vida Roble FSG 17 103.5 90 5 Station 44+00 8/31/81 Camino Vida Roble FSG-1' 14 104.0 91 s Station 38+00 ~otes: 1) 11Compactlon Curve No.11 refers to T~ble B. 2) Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. 3) 11FSG 11 denotes finish subgrade elevation. --..--2\u-.,O ~ TABLE A -SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS ,~~TM Q155(;-(;4 ar1cl/gr __ ~~IM_Q~~~~=7_1J, ASTM D3017-711) ,,, Approximate Water Dry D~gree of ·est Elevation Content Density Compaction Compaction ~ Date of Test Test Location (Feet) (%.) . _!e~f)_ ~-~ {%} Curve No. Remarks . • • I 30 8/31/81 Camino Del Roble FSG .. 15 103.5 90 5 Station 41+60 31 8/31/81 Corte Del Nogal -Sta. 5+00 FSG-21 . 12 104.9 92 5 32 8/31/81 Corte Del Nogal -Sta. 3+50 FSG 13 104.7 92 5 33 8/31/81 Corte Del Nogal -Sta. 1+00 FSG 12 105.4 92 5 Waterline Trench Backfill 311 9/01/81 Corte Del Nogal -Sta. 8+00 FSG-21 8 103.9 90 1 35 9/01/8.1 Corte Del Nogal -Sta. 6+00 FSG-21 10 105.7 92 1 36 9/01/81 Corte Del Abeto -Sta. 11+50 FSG-21 10 105.5 92 1 37 .9/01/81 Corte Del Abeto -Sta. 9+50 FSG-21 11 104.9 91 1 38 · 9/01/81 · Lot 3 FSG~21 15 106.0 92 1 39 9/01/81 Lot 3 FSG-21 15 104.3 91 1 ,o 9/01/81 Lot 3 FSG 13 1.03.8 90 1 n 9/01/81 Lot 3 FSG 13. 104.8 91 1 u 9/01/81 Corte Del Abeto -Sta. 10+00 FSG 14 104.9 91 1 13 9/01/81 Corte Del Abeto -Sta. 11-t50 FSG 15 l0lf.4 91 1 . Sewerllne Trench Backfill 14 9/02/81 Lot 5 -Station 2+00 FSG-48 14 · 95.1 83 5 Test failed, see #6115 I Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No.11 refers to Table B. 2) Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. 3) 11FSG11 denotes finish subgrade .elevation. l18· '! TABLE A -SUMMARY OF FIELD. DENSITY. TEST RESULTS (ASTM 01556-64 and/or ASTM 02922-78, ASTM 03017-78) st o~ Date of Test ; ; 7 II ~ D 1 2 3 fl 5 6 7 8 9/02/81 9/02/81 9/02/81 9/02/81 9/02/81 9/02/81 9/02/81 9/02/81 9/03/81 9/03/81 9/03/81 9/03/81 9/03/81 9/03/81 Test Location Approximate Elevation (feet) Lot 5 -Station 2+00 Lot 5 -Station 3+00 Lot 5 -Station 1+25 Lot 5 -Station 2+70 Waterline Trench Backfill Corte Del Nogal -Sta. 7+00 CQrte Del Nogal -Sta. 6+00 Sewerllne Trench Backfill Lot 5 -Station 2+00 Lot 5 -Station 0+75 Lot 2 Lot 2 Lot 2 Lot 2 Storm Drain Trench Backfill Corte Del Nogal -Sta. 4+00 Corte Del Nogal -Sta. 1+75 FSG-41 FSG-41 FSG~21 FSG-21 FSG FSG FSG FSG FSG-41 FSG-41 FSG-21 FSG-21 FSG-41 FSG-41 Water Dry Degree of Content Density Compaction Compaction (%) (pcf) (%) Curve No. 14 12 14 14 14 13 15 · 15 11 15 12 14 15 13 104.8 105.6 105.3 105.1 104.11 104.1 105.1 104.9 105.9 • 104.7 105.8 107.1 104.3 105.5 92 92 92 92 91 91 92 92 93 92 92 94 91 92 5 $ 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No. 11 refers to Table B. .., 2) Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. 3) "FSG" denotes finish subgrade elevation. Remarks Retest of #644 Slope Area Slope Area Slope Area Slope Area -2111-.n> TABLE A -SUMMARY' OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (AST~QJ!i56-64 and/or ASTM D2922-781 ASTM_Q~0lZ=Zl!J I Approximate Wat~r Dry Degree of est Elevation Content Density Compactic;m Compaction 'llo. Date of Test Test Location (Feet), (%1, ...J.ecf)_ , (%) Cur-ve No. Remarks -. .,_,,,.. ' ' "' ~· '. ' ,., ... ~, -' ;9 9/04/81 Corte Del Nogal -Sta. 3+50 FSG-21 14 104.7 91 5 ;o 9/04/81 Corte Del Nogal -Sta. 2+00 FSG-21 15 105.0 92 5 i1 9/04/81 Corte Del Nogal -Sta. 4+00 FSG 12 104.5 91 5 ;2 9/04/81 Corte Del Nogal -Sta. 2+50 FSG 14 104.4 91 5 ;3 9/04/81 Cc1mlno Vida Roble FSG-41 11 104.8 92 5 Station 39+00 ;4 ·9/04/81 Cami no Vida Roble FSG-41 12 105.2 92 5 Station 37+50 i5 9/04/81 Camino Vida Roble FSG-21 13 105.0 92 5 Station 39+4·o i6· 9/04/81 C_amlno Vida Roble FSG-21 15 104.5 91 5 · Station 38+00 i7 9/08/81 Camino Vida Roble FSG 15 105.4 92 5 Station 39+00 GI,.._ ;a 9/08/81 Camino Vida Roble FSG 15 104.0 91 5 Station 37+80 .. 1;9 9/08/81 Corte Del Nogal -Sta. 39+110 FSG-31 13 104.3 92 5 'O 9/08/81 Corte Del Nogal -Sta. 39+40 FSG-11 13 1011.7 91 5 1 9/09/81 Corte Del No gal -Sta. 5+00 FSG-111 12 106.7 93 5 2 9/09/81 Corte Del Nogal -Sta. 5+00 FSG-2' 12 ' 105.0 92 5 Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No." refers to Table 8. ,# 2) Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to .nearest foot. 3) "FSG" denotes finish subgrade elevation. -21u-.ii> I TABLE A -SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY T·EST RESULTS (ASTM .D1556-64 and/or ASTM D2922-781 ASTM_D3017-78). Approximate Water Dry Degree of . est Elevation Content Denshy Compaction Compaction No. Date of Test T gst Location (Feet) (%) _J_ec;f) ~-(%) Curve No. Remarks - 73 9/09/81 Corte Del Nogal -Sta. 5+00 FSG 14 104.2 91 5 Box Culvert Backfill 74 9/16/81 Camino Vida Roble FSG-21 16 103.7 91 5 Station 37+12 75 9/16/81 Camino Vida Roble FSG 15 104.0 91 5 Station 37+ 12 76 9/16/81 Camino Vida Roble FSG-21 16 105.5 92 5 Station 37+12 77 9/16/81 Camino Vida Roble FSG 12 104.9 92 5 Station 37+ 12 Waterline Trench Backfill 78 9/17/81 Corte Del Nogal -Sta. 4+50 FSG-11 11 104.3 91 5 79 9/17/81 Corte Del Nogal -Sta. 2+80 FSG-11 13 105.1 92 5 BO 9/17/81 Corte Del Nogal -Sta. 1+20 FSG-11 12 104.7 91 5 Bl 9/17/81 Camino Vida Roble FSG-1' 10 107.4 94 5 Station 41+00 B2 9/17/81 Camino Vida Roble FSG-11 9 105.4' 92 5 Station 42+70 33 9/17/81 Camino Vida Roble FSG-11 10 106.6 93 5 Station 45+00 Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No. 11 refers to Table B. 2) Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to 11e~rest foot. 3) 11FSG11 denotes finish subgrade elevation. ~--l.18-JU ~ TABLE A -SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM D1556-64 and/or ASTM 02922-78, ASTM D3017-78) ---------I :-, Approximate Water Dry Degree of st Elevation Content Density Compaction Compaction o. Date of Test Test Location (Feet). (%) ',(pcf) (%) Curve No. ___ Remarks -• • J '' • ,. -J .. -~ J • ~ =-f• ~," • _,.,..,..-4~" ., • ·~ '.< • ~' "Yd· ','; • '·,,; ,• '':: {)'<';.j,£fk W$9::J:, • ':' '\\~~!fu)f?J,f½}h •,;-, ,,14_,.f-•, ~1@l&$},,~f$' • ' !l 9/17/81 Camino Vida Roble FSG-11 15 103.9 91 5 Station 47+50 5 9/ 17 /81 Camino Vida Roble FSG-1' 111 103. 8 91 5 Station 49+20 6 9/21 /81 Camino Vida Roble FSG-11 .. 12 105. 7 92 5 Station 34+00 7 9/21/81 Camino Vida Roble FSG-11 • 12 105.4 92 5 Station 36+00 8 9/21/81 Camino Vida Roble FSG-11 13 105.9 93 5 Station 37+50 19 9/21/81 Camino Vida Roble FSG-11 14 105.5 92 5 Station 39+00 O 9/29/81 ·camlno Vida Roble FSG 12 105.0 92 5 Station 34+50 1 9/.29/81 Camino Vida Roble FSG 12 105. 7 92 5 Station 37+75 2 9/29/81 Camino Vida Roble FSG 12 104.11 91 5 Station II 1+00 3 9/29/81 Camino Vida Roble FSG l3 106.2 93 5 Station 45+00 4 10/ 1/81 Palomar Airport Road FSG-11 14 105.2 92 5 Station 148+50 Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No." refers to Table B. 2) Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. 3) "FSG" denotes finish subgrade ~levatlon. -. '' '·' 218-3D ~ TABLE A -SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM D1556-6lf and/or ASTM D2922-78, ASTM D3017-781 .Approximate Water Dry Degree of est Elevation Con.tent Density Compaction Compaction ~ Date of Test Test Location (FeeU (%) {pcf) _JI) Curve No. Remarks· as 10/1/81 Palomar Airport Road FSG-11 12 105.2 92 5 Station 1lf5+oo 16 10/1/81 Palomar Airport Road FSG-11 14 103.8 91 5 Station 142+50 t7 10/1/81 Palomar A lrport Road FSG-21 15 103.6 91 5 Station 139+00 18 10/7/81. Palomar Airport Road FSG-11 14 105.0-92 5 Station 15'1+50 19 10/7/81 P-alomar Airport Road FSG-11 14 10ll.4 91 5 Station 153+50 10 10/7/81 Palomar Airport Road FSG 15 10ll.4 91 5 Station 150+00 11 10/7/81 Palomar Airport Road FSG 17 . 10ll.0 91 5 Station llf 7+00 Box Culvert Backfill 12 10/22/81 Station 37+28 FSG-21 16· 103.1 90 5 13 10/22/81 Station 37+28 FSG-21 15 105.1 92 5 14 10/22/81 Station 37+28 FSG 12 10lf.6 91 5 Storm Drain Trench Backfill 5 10/22/81 Camino Vida Roble FSG-51 15 103.5 90 5 Station 49+64 Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No." refers to Table B. 2) Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nea'¥est foot. 3) "FSG11 denotes finish subgrade elevation. : ' 218-3D ~ TABLE A -SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM D1556-64 and/or ASTM D2922-78, ASTM D3017-78r st o. Date of Test ; 1 • J. 10/22/81 10/22/81 10/22/81 10/23/8l 10/23/81 10/23/81 10/23/81 10/23/81 10/23/81 10/27/81 10/27/81 10/27/81 Test Location Approximate Elevation ff~~!) Camino Vida Roble Station lf9+64 Camino Vida Roble Station 49+64 Camino Vida Roble Station lf9+6lf Electric Trench Backfill Camino Vida Roble Station 28+22 Corte Del Abeto -Sta. 0+80 Corte Del Abeto -Sta. 1+50 Camino Vida Roble Station 28+22 Camino Vida Roble Station 30+00 Corte Del Abeto -Sta. 6+00 Waterline Trench Backfill Lot 3 Lot 3 Lot 3 FSG--31 FSG-11 FSG FSG-11 FSG-11 FSG-11 FSG-11 FSG-11 FSG-11 FSG-lf' FSG-21 FSG fotes: 1) "Compaction Curve No." refers to Table B. Water Dry Degree of Content pe~s,ty Compa~i,on Comp"~llon (%) . . . (pct) (%) Curve No. 16 11 12 15 16 15 15 15 14 11 13 11 103.8 10lf.7 105.2 99.5 103.2 103.0 l0lf.5 103.6 105.6 106.lf 104.8 '104.8 91 91 92 87 90 90 91 91 92 93 92 92 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 2) 3) Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. 11FSG11 denotes finish subgrade elevation. Remarks Test failed, see #712 Retest of #709 Slope Area Slope Area Slope Area 1•/1!, i,· 218-JU ,,.. . TABLE A -SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM 01556-64 and/or ASTM 02922-78, ASTM 03017-78) Approximate Water Dry Degree of tst Elevation Content Density Co~pactlon Compaction ~ Date of Test Test Location (Feet) (%). _ (pcf) (%) Curve No. 8 9 ~ 1 . I I ' i 10/27/81 10/27/81 10/27/81 10/27/81 10/28/81 10/28/81 10/28/81 10/28/81 10/28/81 10/28/81 10/28/81 Electric Trench Backfill Camino Vida Roble Station 38+00 Camino Vida Roble Station 34+00 Camino Vida Roble Station 26+00 Camino Vida Roble Station 30+00 Tract 80-33 -Electric Trench Back fill FSG-11 FSG-11 FSG-1' FSG-11 Las Palmas Dr. -Sta. 21+50 FSG-11 Las Pal mas Dr. -Sta. 19+50 FSG-11 Las Palmas Dr. -Sta. 18+00 FSG-11 Las Palmas Dr. -Sta. 20+20 FSG-11 Las Palmas Dr. -Sta. 16+50 FSG-1' Tract 80-34 -Electric Trench Back fill Corte Del Nogal -Sta. 5+71 Corte Del Nogal -Sta. 3+71 FSG-11 FSG-11 16 16 15 15 14· 13 15 14 16 17 15 103.7 102.7 104.6 ·102. 7 103.9 104.1 . . 104.6 105.1 104.0 104. 7· 103.7 ~otes: 1) "Compaction Curve No." refers to Table B. 2) 3) Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. "FSG" denotes finish subgrade elevation. 91 90 91 90 91 91 91 92 91 91 91 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Remarks 218 ,1..,. ~ TABLE A -SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM D1556-64 and/or ASTM D2922-7,8 1 ASTM D3017-78) t .. ' Approximate Water Dry Degree of st Elevation Content Density Compaction Compaction 2.!. Date of Test Test Location (Feet) (%) (pcf) . (%) Curve No. Remarks -. ,~, . ., .. ,, ' • '''"' ,..,.,,~4' • ~~·.,.._, ~\''la,'>-• ~~~~" ,,., ' ".,. •,i.h ' ': " ,:,,.• '. ~ ,,-,.,, '' ,¥£.1r., '" -..:,ti· •;•--r,"" .,,,.Pi·,,,W --, 'p .,-lr.,,l,J,., £ ... ,J};,-!!rr4-~ .... , •• '\;.•r.,,-...... #1~? ..... ,~!,,{£,,;-,,-•r , 10/28/81 Corte Del Nog~I -Sta. 2+00 FSG-11 15 1011.11 91 5 Tract 80-33 -Electric Trench Back fill r ) 10/29/81 Las Palmas Dr. -Sta. 23+75 FSG-11 16 · 106.0 93 5 Tract 80-3,11 -Electric Trench Back fill 1 10/29/81 Corte Del Nogal -Sta. 4+00 FSG-1' 15 1011.7 91 5 2 10/29/81 Corte Del Nogal -Sta. 8+00 FSG-11 18 1011.7 91 5 3 10/29/81 Corte Del Nogal -Sta. 0+00 i=SG 16 105.5 92 5 II 10/29/81 Corte Del Nogal -Sta. 9+110 FSG-11 17 . 104 •. 1 91 5 5 10/29/81 ·corte Del Nogal -Sta. 12+00 FSG-11 17 107.4 91 2 6 10/30/81 Camino Vida Roble FSG-11 16 105.7 92 5 Station 40+00 7 10/30/81 Camino Vida Roble FSG 16 1011.2 91 5 Station 42+00 8 10/30/81 Camino Vida Roble FSG-11 16 104.0 91 5 Station 41&+00 9 10/30/81 Corte Del Abeto -Sta. 10+00 FSG 16, 104.0 91 5 0 10/30/81 Corte Del Abeto -Sta. 11+00 FSG-11 17 104.1 91 5 Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No.11 refers to Table B. . 2) Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to neaf.est foot. 3) "FSG" denotes finish subgrade elevation. 21L .,,J TABLE A -SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM D1556-64 and/or ASTM 02922-78 1 ASTM D3017-78) est 'lo. Date of Test -. Approximate Water Dry Degree of Elevation Content Density Compaction Compaction (Feet) (%) (pcf) (%) Curve· No. Test Location 11 ,2 13 '1.4 .5 ,6 17 8 9 0 1 11/2/81 11/2/81 11/2/81 11/2/81 11/2/81 11/2/81 11/3/81 11/3/81 11/3/81 11/3/81 11/3/81 Tract 80-34 -Sewerllne Trench Backfill Lot 2 Lot 2 Embankment Palomar Airport Road Station 138+00 Storm Drain Trench Backfill Lot 5 Lot 4 Lot 6 Embankment Palomar Airport Road Station 138+00 Palomar Airport Road Station 138+25 Palomar Airport Road Station 137+25 Palomar Alr'port Road Station 138+00 Palomar Airport Road Station 137++50 FSG FSG 184 FSG FSG FSG 184 186 188 16 17 14 14 14 14 14 " 15 16 190 (FSG) 15 .· 191 (FSG) 15 104.9 103.1 100.7 104.7 105.3 106.'9 103.2 103.9 104.0 106.8 105.9 Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No." refers to Table B. 2) Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. 3) 11FSG" denotes finish subgrade elevation. 91 90 88 91 92 93 90 91 91 93 93 1 1 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Remarks Slope Area Slope Area Test failed,. see 1747 Retest of 1743 · · -21r .. n TABLE A -SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (~ST'-1 P1556-64 and/or ASTM 02922-78, ASTM 03017--78} Approximate Water Dry ' Degree of :st Elevatlon Content Density Compaction Compaction ~ Date of Test Test Location (Feet) (%) (ecf) ~<\l Curve 'No. Remarks . \ .·!· Tract 80-33 -Storm Drain Trench Backfill 2 .11/9/81 Lot 3 FSG 12 108.4 95 3 3 11/9/81 Lot 4 FSG 13 104.3 91 3 II -11/9/81 Lot 5-FSG 14 103.8 91 3 5 11/9/81 Lot 6 FSG 11 104.8 92 3 • 6 11/9/81 Lot 7 FSG 13 104.5 91 3 1: 11/9/81 Lot 8 FSG 16 103.8 91 3 Tract 80-34 -Structural Section 8 11/9/81 Palomar Airport Road FSG 20 101.5 93 9 South Side -Sta. 157+10 9 11/9/81 Palomar Airport Road FSG 19 101.1 92 9 South Side -Sta. 155+00 0 11/9/81 Palomar Airport Road FSG 14 10,8.0 94 5 South Side -Sta. 152+00 1 11/9/81 . Palomar Airport Road FSG 13 106.9 93 5 South Side -Sta. 148+00 2 11/9/81 Palomar Airport Road FSG 15 106.8 93 5 South Side -Sta. 145+00 3 11/10/81 Palomar Airport Road FSG 14 105.8 92 5 South Side -Sta. 143+00 Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No.11 refers to Table B. . 2) Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. 3) . 11FSG11 denotes finish-subgrade elevation. ·-........ --1 •• ' '· 2111-.:su TABLE A -SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM 01556-611 and/or ASTM 02922-781 ASTM 03017-78) est :!!!.:_ Date of Test rs r6 '7 ,a 79 BO Bl 82 83 811 85 86 87 88 · 11/ 12/81 11/12/81 11/12/81 11/12/81 11/ 13/·81 11/17/81 11/17/81 11/17/81 11/18/81 11/ 18/81 11/.18/81 11/18/81 11/18/81 11/18/81 Test Location Approximate Elevation (Feet) -~-~~-· -., .. '~,_...,.,.......,..,.._.~-.,....,.........,...,._ Palomar Airport Road South Side -Sta. 146+00 Palomar Airport Road South Side -Sta. 143+00 Palomar Airport Road South Side -Sta. 140+00 Palomar Airport Road So~th Side -Sta. 138+00 Palomar Airport Road South Side -Sta. 138+00 FBG FBG FBG FBG FBG Corte Del Nogal -Sta. 12+00 FSG Corte Del Abeto -Sta. 10+00 FSG Corte Del Abeto -Sta. 12+00 FSG Corte Del Abeto -Sta. 2+00 FSG Corte Del Abeto -Sta. 3+50 FSG Corte Del Abeto -Sta. !&+75 FSG Corte Del Abeto -Sta. 6+50 FSG Corte Del Nogal -Sta. 2+25 FSG Corte Del Nogal -Sta. 4+75 FSG 5 5 5 6 5 13 l3 lll 12 12 11 12 15 11 Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No." refers to Table B. Dry Degree of Density Compaction Compaction (pcf) (%) Curve No. Remarks ... as .. • · • 1"'-',"', ... n~•;• -~. ,;n . .,.i,1 •• , ,..i,.Ci ·:-)/:J ..... ~_.,.,,..t .. ,~p,.,_,,' ... ,,.h4-,f/-w,-,.-.... ,, •• ,.,.,.,,,..:!-H, ,,. .• J.,J,...,,..J!!~-·' 131.6 131.6 132.2 127.5 132.6 109.8 106.7 107.5 ' 109.3 105.9 105.4 106.7 107.9 106.5 95 95 96 92 96 96 93 911 95 92 92. 93 94 93 11 11 11 11 11 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Retest of #771 Test failed, see #779 Retest of #778 2) Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. 3) 11FSG11 denotes finish sub grade elevation. ll) "EBG" denotes finish hasP. orarle elevation. ,,.,-:--:--·---·-·--.. ··--..• ,, 211 ., ! . .. TABLE A -SUMMAl!Y~9E Ell;bO OENSI TY ~TEST RESULTS (ASTM 01556-64~ and/or_ ASTM D2!J~~-:7Q, ASTM 03017-78) ~ Approximate Water Dry D~gree of est Elevation Content Density Compaction Compaction ~o. Date of Test Test Location (Feet) (%) _iec:f) . (%) Curve· No. Remarks - i4 11/10/81 Palomar Airport Road FSG 16 104.8 92 5 South Side -Sta. 1'11+50 ;5 11/10/81 Palomar Airport Road FSG 15 104.4 91 5 South Side -Sta. 138+50 Electric Trench Backflll i& 11/10/81 Corte Del Nogal -Sta. 4+80 FSG 14 106.9 93 5 i7 11/10/81 Corte Del Nogal -Sta •. 4+70 FSG . 16 1011.4 91 5 Structural Section i8 11/12/81 Palomar Airport Road FBG · 5 . 127.4 92 11 Test failed, see #772 South Side -Sta. 156+50 i9 11/ 12/81 Palomar Airport Road FBG 5 127.0 92 11 Test failed, see #773 South Side -Sta. 153+00 '0 11/12/81 Palomar Airport Road FBG 5 128.0 92 11 Test failed, see #774 South Side -Sta. 150+00 '1 11/12/81 Palomar Airport Road F.BG 6 U3.7 89 11 Test failed, see #775 South Side -Sta. 146+00 ·2 11/12/81 Palomar Airport Road FBG 5 131.8 95 11 Retest of 1768 South Side -Sta. 156+50 '3 11/12/81 Palomar Airport Road FBG 5 131.4 95 11 Retest of 1769 South Side -Sta. 153+00 4 11/12/81 Palomar Airport Road FBG 6 132.0 95 11. Retest of #770 South Side -s·ta. 150+00 Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No.11 refers to Table' B .. 2} Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. 3} "FSG" denotes finish subgrade elevation. 4} "FBG" denotes finish base grade elevatlone · " '. - ~ TABLE A -SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM D1556-64 and/or ASTM D2922-I81 _ ASJM D3q17--78} Approximate Water Dr·y Degree of .. st Elevation Content Density co·mpactlon Compaction o. Date of test Test Location (Feet} -(%} .J.e~f)-~ -~ ( \} Curve No. Remarks . 9 11/18/81 Corte Del Nogal -Sta. 6+50 FSG. 15 106.8 93 5 0 11/18/81 Corte Del Nogal -Sta. 8+00 FSG 10 101.0 94 5 Tract 80-33 -Structural Section 1. 11/19/81 Las Palmas Dr. -Sta. 22+00 FSG 14 107.3 94 ·s 2 11/19/81 Las Palmas Dr. -Sta. 20+00 FSG 13 106.7 93 5 3 11/19/81 Las Palmas Dr. -Sta. 18+00 FSG 12 106.7 93 5 4. 11/ 19/81 Las Palmas Dr. -Sta. 16+00 FSG 15 . 107.6 94 5 5 11/ 19/81 Las Palmas Dr. -Sta. 15+00 FSG 14 107.8 94 5 Tract 80-34 -Structural Section 6 11/20/81 Corte Del Nogal -Sta. 14+00 FBG 8 125.8 97 12 7 11/20/81 Corte Del Nogal -Sta. 12+00 FBG 8 124.5 96 12 8 11/20/81 Corte Del Nogal -Sta. 10+25 FBG 9 124.4 96 12 9 11/20/81 Corte Del Abeto -Cul-de-Sac FBG 9 118.8 92 12 Test failed, see #800 0 11/20/81 Corte Del Abeto -Cul-de-Sac FBG 9 125.4 97 12 Retest of #799 1 11/23/81 Corte Del Abeto -Sta. 10+00 FBG 7 123.0 95 12 2 11/23/81 Corte Del Abeto -Sta. 8+00 FBG 6 122.8 95 12 3 11/23/81 Corte Del Abeto -Sta. 6+00 FBG 7 123.5 95 12 Notes: 1} "Compaction Curve No." refers to Table e. 2) Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. 3) 11FSG11 denotes finish subgrade elevation. 4) "FBG11 denotes finish base grade elevation. , r. .·---·~ -· 21-_J r TABLE A -SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM 01556-64 and/or ASTM D2922-78,: ASTM D3017-:71} ' Approximate -Water Dry . Degree of . est Elev at Ion Content Density Compaction Compaction No. Date of Test Test l--e>catlon (Feet) (%) .(pcf) (%) Curve No •. Remarks - ~~ 0' .;' -;-~:,~';" i ',.,, ~-i '(->1:;; '.,,: ,~. ,' ' :;• :_ ,,· -"; ;,~ ' ''t • I ' .,l ' I' ~ '_,~•it"7,1 "-.,_, ,_,.,., <• ~~-. ~' •"' . I ' •• ~ • 04 11/23/81 Corte Del Abeto -Sta. 3+00 FBG 10 124.6 96 12 05 11/23/81 Corte Del Abeto -Sta. 1+00 FBG 10 124.7 96 12 06 11/23/81 Corte Del Nogal -Sta. 7+00 FBG 8 125.7 97 12 07 11-/23/81 Corte Del Nogal -Sta. 3+00 FBG 8 124.6 96 12 08 11/23/81 Corte Del Nogal -Sta. l+OO FBG 10 124.2 96 12 • Tract 80-33 -Structural Section · 09 11/24/81 Las Palmas Dr. -Sta. 16+00 FBG 8 123.7 95 12 10 11/24/81 Las Palmas Dr. -Sta. 18+00 fQG 9 123.2 95 12 u 11/24/81 Las Palmas Dr. -Sta. 20+00 FBG 10 122.3 95 12 12 . 11/24/81 · Las Pal mas Dr. -Sta. 22+00 FBG 8 124.3 96 12 13 11/24/81 Las Palmas Dr. -Sta. 23+00 FBG 9 J24.9 96 12 Tract 80-34 -Structural Section 14 11/25/81 Camino Vida Roble FSG Station 27+00 16. 108.3 95 5 15 11'/25/81 Camino Vida Roble FSG Station 30+00 1S 107.3 94 5 16 11/25i81 Camino Vida Roble FSG 15 108.9 95 5 Station 37+00 Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No.11 refers to Table B. 2) Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. 3) "FSG" denotes finish subgrade elevation. 4) "FBG" denotes finish base gra~e elevation'\ ---'•' 218 ..... '11 i< TABLE A -·SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM 01556-64 and/or ASTM 02922-78, ASTM 03017-78} :!St !2.:. Date of Test 7 11/25/81 8 12/01/81 9 12/01/81 0 12/01/81 1 12/02/81 2 12/02/81 3 12/02/81 4 12/02/81 5 12/02/81 6 12/02/81 Test Location . Camino Vida Roble Station 28+50 Waterline Trench Backfill Camino Vida Roble· Station 32+00 Camino Vida Roble Station 32+00 Camino Vida RoJ:,le Station 32+00 Camino Vida Roble Station 49+50 Camino Vida Roble Station 49+50 Camino Vida Roble Station 49+50 Approximate Elevation lf~~u FSG FSG-41 FSG-21 FSG FSG-51 FSG-31 FSG-11 Storm Drain Trench Backfill Lot 1 FSG Structural Section Camino Vida Roble Station 41+50 Camino Vida Roble Station 35+60 FSG FSG Water Dry Degree of Content Density Compaction Compaction (%) (pcO (%) Curve· No. 15 108.1 94 5 13 1011.0 91 5 13 104.S 91 ,5 13 106.2 93 5 15 104.0 91 5 15 103.3 90 5 14 105.5 92 5 15 105.6 92 5 17 106.7 93 5 19 96.0 83 5 Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No. 11 refers to Table B. 2) Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. 3) "FSG" denotes finish subgrade elevation., .. Remarks Wash Out Repair Wash Out Repair Wash Out Repair Wash Out Repair Test failed, see #829 J ·-218-3D ,. TABLE A -SUMMARY ·oF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM D1556-64 and/or ASTM D2922-78, ASTM D3017-78). !St fo. Date of Test ~ ,, ~···~----··-- 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 ,. 5 6 1. a 12/02/81 12/02/81 12/03/81 12/03/81 -12/03/81 12/03/81 12/03/81 12/03/81 12/07/81 12/07 /81 12/07/81 12/07/81 Test Location ---<~ .. ,1,_.. ........ J,~-•· •" ~, •. : .... ~ C,C,)~t"'_.r ... 0#¢ tl~,- Camino Vida Roble Station 34+00 Camino Vida Roble Station 36+50 Camino Vida Roble Station 35+60 Camino Vida Roble Station 34+00 Camino Vida Roble Station 33+00 Camino Vida Roble Station 43+00 ·camlno Vida Roble Station 46+00 Camino Vida Roble Station 48+00 Tract 80-33 -Stor.m Drain Trench Backfill Lot 2 Lot 2 Lot 6 Lot 6 Approximate Elevation (Feet} FSG FSG FSG FSG FSG ·FSG FSG FSG FSG-21 FSG FSG-21 ·'FSG I Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No.11 refers to .Table B. ' Wate.r D.ry Degree of Content Density Compaction Compaction (%1 · . Jpef:) ' (%) Cur,.y.e No. 18 16 13 15 15 14 14 15 15 17 14 18 95.0 105.3 104.3 104.6 104.6 101.2 106.4 106.4 108.0 105.8 104.3 106.4 83 92 91 91 91 94 93 93 94 92 91 93 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 2) Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are· to nearest foot. 3) "FSG" denotes finish subnrade elevation. Remarks Test failed, see #830 Retest of #826 Retest of #827 -211 /-' TABLE A -SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM 01556-64 and/or ASTM 02922-781 ASTM 03017-78) ,. Approximate Water Dry· Degree of !St Elevation Content Density Compaction Compaction !2:_ ·Date of Test Test Location (Feet) (%) . _(_ecf) .-~_(\) Curve No. -~-Bemarks . Tract 80-34 -Structural Section . 9 12/08/81 Camino Vida Roble . FBG 11 123.0 95 -12 Station 30+00 ! .o 12/08/81 Camino Vida Roble FBG 11 126.6 98 12 Station 33+00 1 12/08/81 Camino Vida Roble FBG 10 125.8 97 12 Station 36+00 ,2 12/08/81 Camino Vida Roble FBG 11 . 126.3 98 12 Station 39+00 .3 12/08/81 Camino Vida Roble FBG 5 123.11 95 12 Station 112+00 4 12/08/81 Camino Vida Roble FBG 6 125 .• 8 rn 12 Station 45+00 5 12/08/81 Camino· Vida Roble FBG 9 1i2.8 95 12 Station 47+50 Tract 80-33 -Structural Section 6 12/ 10/81' Las Palmas Dr. -Sta. 23+50 FBG 9 122.4 95 12 Wash Out Area Storm Drain Trench Backfill 7 12/ 10,,1 Lot 3 FSG 11 105.8 92 5 8 12/ 10/81 Lot 5 FSG 10 106.4 93 5 Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No.11 refers to Table B. 2) Unless otherwise noted elevations-shown are to nearest foot. 3) 11FSG11 denotes finish subgrade elevation. 4) 11FBG" denotes finish base grade elevation. ---, -------_...., -218-3D " • I TABLE A -SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM D1556-64 and/or ASTM D2922-78., ASTM~ P~C>17-7~H ' Approximate Water Dry Degree of 'est Elevation Content Density Compaction Compaction No. Date ·Of Test Test Location (Feet) (%)' _j_ecf) ('%) Curve No. Remarks -~---- 119 12/10/81 Lot 1 FSG-21 12 104.5 91 5 50 12/ 15/81 Lot 1 FSG 13. 108.6 92 2 Tract 80-34 -Waterline Trench Backfill 51 12/15/81 Camino Vida Roble FSG-51 15 108.5 92 2 Water Break Repair Station 32+00 52 . 12/ 15/81 Camino Vida Roble FSG-3' 16 106.4 93 5 Water Break Repair Station 32+00 53 12/15/81 Camino Vida Roble FSG-11 16 105.8 92 5 Water Break Repair Station 32+00 54 '12/ 15/81 Camino Vida Roble FSG 15 106.3 93 5 Water Break Repair . Station 32+00 55 12/ 15/81. Camino Vida Roble FSG 14 \06.4 93 5 Water Break Repair Station 32+00 56 12/15/81 Camino Vida Roble FBG 11 l24.7 96 12 Water Break Repair Station 32+00 Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No." refers to Table B. . .. 2) Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. 3) 11 FSG11 denotes finish subgrade elevation. 4) 11FBG11 denotes finish base grade elevation.· :i 218 -------·------·-·--··---------.. ... . ----~--------· -·-· TABLE A -SUMMARY OF F1ELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM D1556-64 and/or ASTM 02~~2-78, ASTM Dl017-78) Approximate Water Dry ~egree of !St Elevation Content Density Compaction Compaction lo. Date of Test Test Location (E~et) (\) (pcf) (%) Curve No. Remarks - ' 7 11/25/81 Camino Vida Roble FSG 15 ·108.1 94. 5 Station 28+50 Waterline Trench Backflll 8 12/01/81 Camino Vida Roble · FSG-111 Station 32+00 13 1011.0 91 5 9 12/01/81 Camino Vida Roble FSG-21 Station 32+00 13 1011.5 91 5 0 12/01/81 Camino Vida Roble FSG 13 106.2 93 5 Station 32+00 1 12/02/81 Camino Vida Roble FSG-51 15 104.0 91 5 Wash Out Repair Station 49+50 2 12/02/81 Camino Vida Roble FSG-31 15 103.3 90 5 Wash Out Repair Station 49+50 3 12/02/81 Camino Vida Roble FSG-11 111 105.5 92 5 Wash Out Repair Station 49+50 • Storm Drain Trench Backfill II 12/02/81 Lot 1 FSG 15 105.6 92 5 Wash Out Repair Structural Section 5 12/02/81 Camino Vida Roble FSG 17 106.7 93 5 Station 41+50 6. 12/02/81 Camino V.lda. Roble FSG Station 35+6o· 19 · 96.0 83 5 Test failed, see #829 <\ Notes: 1) "Compaction Curve No. 11 refers to Table B. • 2) Unless otherwise noted elevatlon.s shown are to· nearest foot. . 3) 11FSG" denotes finish subgrade elevation • 11 ---1~--.. ..... --___,J ----218-3D TABLE A -SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM D1556-6ll and/or ASTM 02922-781 ASTM D3017-78) I Approximate · Wa~er Dry llegree of 1st Elevation Content Density Compaction Compaction J.2!_ Date of Test T.est Location (Feet) (%) (pcf) (%) Curve No. 7 8 9 :> 1 2 1 • • f 12102/81 12/02/81 12/03/81 12/03/81 12/03/81 12/03/81 '12/03/81 t, 12/03/81 12/07/81 12/07/81 12/07 /81 12/07/81 Camino Vida Roble Station 34+00 Camino Vida Roble Station 36+50 Camino Vida Roble Station 35+60 Camino Vida Roble s tatlon 3q+oo Camino Vida Roble Station 33+00 Camino Vida Roble Station 1&3+00 Camino Vida Roble Station 46+00 Camino Vida Roble Station 48+00 Tract. 80-33 -Storm Drain Trench Backfill Lot 2 Lot 2 Lot 6 Lot 6 FSG FSG FSG FSG FSG FSG FSG FSG FSG-21 FSG FSG-21 FSG 18 16' ·13 15 15 111 11& 15 15 17 14 18 95.0 105.3 1oq.1 1oq.6 101&.6 107.2 106.4 106.4 108.0 105.8 104.3 106.4 llotes.: 1) "Compaction Curve No. 11 refers to Table B. 2) Unless otherwise noted elevatlohs shown are to nearest foot. 3) 11FSG11 denotes finish s11hnrade elevation. 83 92 91 91 91 9q 93 93 94 92 9.1 93 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Remarks Test failed, see #830 Retest of 1826 Retest of 1827 ---··· ·-·· ------------····211 ... I ' TABLE A -SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM 01556-64 and/or ASTM 02922-78, ASTM 03017 ... 78) Approximate Water Dry Degree of st Elevation Content Density Compaction Compaction ;o. Date of Test Test Location (Feet) (%) (pcf) -. ~{%) Curve No. Remarks Tract 80-34 -Structural Section 9 12/08/81 Camino Vida Roble FBG 11 123.0 95 12 Station 30+00 0 12/08/81 Camino Vida Roble FBG 11 126.6 98 12 Station 33+00 1 12/08/81 Camino Vida Roble FBG 10 125.8 97 12 Station 36+00 2 12/08/81 Camino Vida Roble FBG 11 126.3 98 12 Station 39+00 - 3 12/08/81 Camino Vida Roble FBG 5 123.4 95 12 Station 42+00 'I 12/08/81 Camino Vida Roble FBG 6 125.8 97 12 Station 115+00 5 12/08/81 Camino· Vida Roble FBG 9 i22.a 95 12 Station 47+50 Tract 80-33 -Structural Section j 12/10/81 Las Palmas Dr. -Sta. 23+50 FBG 9· 122.4 95 12 Wash Out Area Storm Drain Trench Backfill 1 12/10/fl Lot 3 FSG 11 105.8 92 5 8 12/10/81 Lot 5 FSG 10 .. 106.4 93 5 NoteSt: 1) "Compaction Curve No." refers to· Table 8-. 2) Unless otherwise noted el·evatlons shown are to nearest foot. 0 3) 11FSG11 denotes finish subgrade elevation. 4) 11FBG" denotes finl_sh base grade elevation. ' ___, --~--____, ------.......... --J ---· -·····-·-' ----~ ----- 218-3D TABLE A -SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM D1556-61J and/or ASTM D2922-78, AST~ D3Q17=7U Approximate Water Dry =St Elevation Content Density !o. Date of Test Test Location (Feet) (%) (pcf) - 9 12/10/81 Lot 1 FSG-21 12 104.5 0 12/ 15/81 Lot 1 FSG 13 108.6 Tract 80-34 -Waterline Trench Backflll 1 12/15/81 Camino Vida Roble FSG-5' 15 108.5 Station 32+00 2 12/15/81 Camino Vida Roble FSG-31 16 106.4 Station 32+00 3 12/15/81 Camino Vida Roble FSG-11 . 16 105.8 Station 32+00 l 12/15/81 Camino Vida Roble FSG 15 106.3 Station 32+00 7 12/15/81 Camino Vida Roble FSG 14 H&.4 ~ Station 32+00 1,2/ 15/81 Camino Vida Roble FBG 11 i24.7 Station 32+00 '( ~otes_; 1) "Compaction Curve No.11 refers to Table 8. ~ 2) Unless otherwise noted elevations shown are to nearest foot. 0 3) "FSG'' denotes finish subgrade _elevation. 4) "FBG" denotes finish base grade elevation. Degree of Compaction Compaction (%) Curve No. Remarks 91 5 92 2 92 2 Water Break Repair 93 5 Water Break Repair 92 5 Water Break Repair 93 5 Water Break Repair 93 5 Water Break Repair 96 12 Water Break Repair 21a·-3D TABLE B LABORATORY COMPACT.ION TEST RESULTS (ASTM D1557-78} Compaction Maximum Optimum Test Description Source of Dry Density Water Content (Curve) No. of Material Material (pcf} (%} 1 SANDY and CLAYEY On-site 114.9 13;5 SILT (ML), gray-tan 2 SIL TY SAND (SM), On-site 118.4 12.s yellowish tan 3 CLAYEY SAND (SC), On-site 114.S 13.S light brown 4 CLAYEY SAND (SC), On-site 115.S 12.-8 brownish black s CLAYEY SAND (SC), On-site 114.S 1s.s yellowish tan · 6 CLAVEY SAND (-SC), On-site· .. 120.s 12.1 green_ish tan 7 ·sANDY SILT (ML), On-site 1os.s· 13.8 reddish brown 8 . CLAYEY SAND (SC), On-site . 118.S 14.0 yellowish brown 9 CLAVEY SAND (SC), ·On-site _ 109.S 18.0 greenish brown 10 SANDY CLAY (CL), On-site 107.0 19.t) grayish brown 11 WELL GRADED GRAVEL Import 138.6 6. t (GW), brown 12 SIL TY SAND (SM), Import 129.S 9.4 ,. brown ,.:._. . ,,, "' Certificate of ()ompl1ance (Part 1 of 2) B;l-'fiMAr2 A1(ifo(2..T i:,us p,l ~ LoT b Proiect ade ~, ,1.p ... q+ I Te:?1$ CoolY1rb$ iMeS<W. tTA Project An::h~ngin...-I Buildng Pennit N'umber , • CAl?;lhM.D CA ., -~ Project Location Pl.i Checked By City/Town &,_p, Documentation Author cGma1a Zon. <111.ts/87 Da I Prescriptive Approach/Performance Approach Strategy . · : Gene,al CEC ~pancy Type • •. : .•••••. X tftlte 2 U BC Occupancy Group/DMs10n • , • • • • . 3 Package Selected , • , • • , • • • , , O p./Jle 4 Gross Condtioned Floor Area , • , , , , /qOOQ tt2 Roof and Floors s Proposed RooUCeiling Rt (CF-2, CF:3) • • 1· · hr-F-tt2tetu· 6 Required Roof/Ceiling Rt (CF-2) , , • , • ~ hr-F-ft2/Btu 7 Proposed Exiarior.Floor Rt (CF~2. _CF-3) , • _ hr-F-tt2/atu 8 Required Exutrior E=Joor Rt (CF-2) • • • • • · hr-F-tt2/Bii., Walla 9 Pn;;posed Opaque WaJJ Rt (CF-2, CF-3) • • ':i. B'.7-. hr-F-lt2/Btu 10 Wall Heat Capacity (CF-3) •••••.• ; .£!JL_ Btu1F-tt2 11 Required Opaque Wal Rt (CF-2) • • , • • ~ hr-F-tt2/Btu Glazing In WaJla . 12 Exterior Wall Al'N (CF-2) • , • • • , • • 13 {po tt2 13 Total Glazing Arn (CF-2) •• , • • • • • lf;f',>6 tt2 14 Proposed Total Percent (Line 13 / Line 12) -~ % 15 Awrage Total SC (CF-2) ••• , , •••. 16 Allowed Total Glazing Percent. • • • • • % 17 West Extanor Wtd Area {CF-2) , • • . • , • Jft'O tt2 18 West Glazing Area (CF-2) • • • • • • • • ¢, tt2 19 Proposed West Percant (CF-2) •••• , • 9? % ?(). A...erage West SC (CF-2) • • • • • • • • ~ 21 Anowed Wr't Glazing Percent • • • • • • ~ % Gluing In Roof {CF-I) ~fosed Ak1f.-d 22 Skylight 1 • • -• ·• • • • • • . . -»,tA_ tt2 23 $kylight2 , , • • • • , • • ------tt2 24 Skylight 3 • • • • • • • • • _____ ___ tt2 25 Sky"ght 4 , • • • , , , , • -+-----4--tt2 26 Skylights • • • • • • • • • ___ ___ tt2 27 Skylight 6 ~ l , , • , , • • ___ . tt2 . f· 28 -..... tt'2 <.,'_-'>, Skytight 7 ~ i .-. • . . . . _...,__ 29 Skylight 8 , • • • • • • • • ___ _____ tt2 U;hdng . 30 ProposedAqusted LPO (CF-5) • , ,. •• ,..J12_ Watts1tt2 31 AUowed LPO (CF-5) • • : • • , • ·, • , • ,..l1/A-Wattslft2 HVAC · 32 P.rtonnance S. Seleclad . • • • .. , . • ----1l:__ 33 Proposed Fa, Wacage Index (CF-4) • • • ~ Wattlltt? ~ AUowed Fa, ~acage l~x • . • • • • •• ~ Wattslft2 35 Proposed Cooling ·Power Index (CF-') • • ;_jJjk,_ BtuMt2 =--~C::::~~;cc;~>: :· ~ :::·· 31 AbNd HNiing Power~-. : . . • . . . ~0, ·p ~2. FOffll Revised September 1991 ··--·------,. ____ .... __ ---··---..... ·,._ ~------··-.... -. ·. CF-1 For Enforcement Ag~ncy Use Only .: ... :=-•• } •-,I , :. . . ·\' . . ·•. '\ ,,.. .. ~ .. .. . ' . ' " , ~ .. Field Checked By Oaie Approved By Data Performance Approach Energy Bud;• . 1 CEC Occ:upancy Type • : .' .' • • • • • ~~ Off 1le 2 UBC Occ:upancyGroup/OiYision , • • • • . 4 Condlioned Floor .ArN • , • • • . • • • tt2 4 BudgetTal* ..••••.•..•.. _ .1·5312 5 Allowed Energy Budget (WS-1A) • • • • • ) '2.15 k8!1J/yr-tt2 Cak:ulated Annual ~ Conaumpdon 6 · Approved Cu:ulation Melhod • • , • , • '5? Jy1 7 cec Designation • • • • • • • • • • • • __ _ 8 ""'ltipHlllr • • • • · • • • • • • • • • • • ~ .__ __ Eadmated En.-gy U.. : 9 Healing • • • , • • • , • • • . • • , . ~ k8tutyr-ft2 10 Cooling • , • • • , • • • • • • , • • , k8tu/yr-tt2 11 Fans • • • • • • • • • • , • , • • • • ~. . k8tutyr-tt2 12 Ughts • • • • • ·•. • • • • • , • , • • .~ k8tutyr-tt2 13 • Miscellaneous Equipmwat • • • • • • • , ~ k8tulyr-ft2 14 Total • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • )\4,B k8tulyr-tt2 15 ,14. Tollll Energy Uu (bl 811 li'Ht 14) • . ,____ k8tu/yr-ft2 Compliance Statement General. The proposed building represented in this set of compliance documentation is consisterit wi1h the other compliance forms and worksheets. wilh the plans and specifications and with any other caJculations « computar n.m submitted wilh this permit application. Performance Approach. (whf.on applicable) The energy performance estimaila presented on lhil fom, w.as calculated using the approved calculation meltlod inacaied abo-.. and with the CEC established fix&d and restricted engineering nputs for !he applicable climate zone and occupancy type. . Prncriptive Approach. (when applicable) The proposed builcing has been designed 10 meet the requirements of the Alternative Component P~e indica!eq .abov. tor lhe approp,:iate occupancy type and climate mr,e . ·,, 'J' ~.. ~--~ • •• ..,,.. '• ·i • -;., ~-.... • .. AcldrNa . • :6,4AI 01~··. ~ qz.120 Page_ol_ -···""'":'-" ........ -··---:- j \ ....__ --. Enve·lope·summary Form and Worksheet (Pa,f2012) CF-2 I -~ 0i.~oM.A(2 -A1Bfog1--P£AZA -/3U'.Xt 8 Project Tille · · . For Enforcement Agency Use Only. . . _ . s ( P, . . b~1..s / P21 Documentation Aulhor/Flll11 · ate r . Opaque Exterior Walls and Doors A B C D E Surface Area Wall North East South West ; Type (An) . {Ae) .(As) (Aw); uJ---I jot () tf'h,,? 'um d in~".'... T) l'h '(/; j,,i 14D 0-I 9-n._ . ' . ' ' -.. - Totals Glazing in Walls A B C 0 E Surface Area ' Glazing North· East South West Type (An) (Ae) (As) {Aw)' ' : .j ~t'.J \O'\-()· 417/J (/) - C , . ' " ! .. ; : i ' Totals Checked By Date G H J K Proposed Wall Requirement Total Heat A-Value : -~Value 3 (At) Capacify (Rt) At/ At (Rr) At/ Rr \ 14-() 15,59; 'L,,tj~ ?/·1'2.5 J.1 'A >.I/~ i440 l,il5 IO, {p.8 134,~-l\1:&. Ai/A ·,i9-,,n ~.7~ :?.~I 7:A.o 'h.'i\ ,.,·11:,,. -·• 7. 7 .. ; ' .. .. . ,Z.3190 Total 4.9L?J . Total Proposed Required · .. Weighted Average A-Value ! '" :f, 3;: ·j · · Col F/Coll I~#: .I eof /Col K F G H J K Glazing Characteristics ~eigh~ Averages ,i ., Total Total Area West Area Total Area (At) U-Value SC XU-Value xSC xsc \f?Bt? 1.1 ,&5 . 7nll)PJ (1j J"L ,Z'? - : ; ' : .... ' : : .. ; - Totala U-Value West SC .Total SC Averages l LI ! ¢ I ,£96 · I Col I_/ Col F"-Col J /ColE Col Kl-col F ' . ' :p,.,,9 · Of · I ..... ~ -1 . . i · . Envelope Summary Form and W9rksheet (Part 1 of 2} CF-2 r ~ ~L.ofjJA{l. A1gPo~T ft,AZA -/2kDl B For Enforcement Agency Use Only ............. - Project rile [?, P, . &h.5 IB7 Roof A Root Type K-\ ; Total- B C D Proposed Area/ Acea A-value .. A-value ~~o. 'L2,U "601-: . - ,. •. IP?7bo Total '3o,Z.. .. Ave,ageR-valua l 'l"l,1]. l Col B/Col D Checked By _Exposed Floor Area/Soffits A Floor/Soffit Type - "' Total B C D Area/ Acea Proposed R-value A-value Total Average R-value _{ __ _, Co!B/Col D '--· Glazing in Roof \ ____ A B C D . e F G H Sl.lrfaceArea -Type i----....-----.-------.------,.------,---1 P,:oposed Norlh Eut South West Horizontal Total (At) U-value Exterior Wall Area A B C Nonh · 1 ¼;· ·-I l2fo Fann-Revised~ 1986 D Surface Area Sou1h I iz.oo e West I !440 · Total ..._ _ ___, F To~ J ,Mo;_ .. Date 'p .. ,,9. -.:' · . ot -. ..,. __ 1 -....... . Construction Assembly Co.mpliance Form CF-3 For Enforcement Agency Use Only PrOject Title · ~. P. . . Docuqlentation Author/F11111 la I . Checl<Qd By_ Date General Information ! • r 1 Assembly Type and Number • • • • • • • • • ; • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • .a;;.:i~...i..- , 2 Framing Type , • • • . ._ • • • · . • • • . • • • : • • . ~ , • • • .... . ~ , • • • • ; • • • • • • • • • • __ _ 3 Fran1ing ~ze .............. : ... ~ ..... ,: ..................... ._· ~..;:._- 4 Framing Spacirtg • • • • • • • • • • • • • • .; • • • • ·• • • • • • • • ·• • , , • • • • • • • • • • • inches 5 Insulation in Cavity • • • c • • • • • • • ":.~":'" • , • • • • • • • • • • • • ·• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • F-ft2-ttr/Btu s Effective A-value of Cavity/Framing • • • • ; • • •. • • • • • .• • , • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • F-ft2.hr/8tu . • ,b A ... . . ..... .. .. ., .. • !) ••. . ' .. /) : • i> '. ~ .. ·. , ' . . . ' . . . ,, ...... -• 'i) . : /). . ... Sketch oi Construction Asse.mbly List of ~onstruction Components A Oesaiption 1 (l COWfl~ Tl LT -U f 2 .,~ . 8 C Wall we· ht (lb/~ . 74:.g. D s 'fie ~ (Btu/F-lb) ,21 E HC Col CxCol 0 (Btu/F-sf) !S.5$?z 3 :--------~-------~~-----------~----- " . ,t ____ _ 5 ·---------------~----------------~ 6 7 8 Total A-Value w/o .film• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ___ l_. {y;...;;;.f?> ___ . _ Total HC 15. 5.f) 9 inside surface airfllm •••••• , ••••• · ••• ___ ,_h .... ~ ........ -__ to .,Outside surface air file; •••••••••••••• __ , __ · \_],___ 11 10tal ltlermal resi~ (Rt) • ·• • • • • •. • • , • • _'l ___ , Q.._· 3 __ · __ 12 U-value(f/Une 1'1) •••• ,: •••••••••• ,, __ ,_4;...;;0;.___ ·Paae · ot ·, ___ _ \ ... _ ... · -·. Construction Assem~ly Compliance Form CF-3 Lore> For Enforcement Agency Use Only Documentation Aulhor/F1m1 · Da~ Checked By General Information Assembly Type and Number ·• • • • • • .• • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • \VAkl, ~ _ 2 ·f rarning Type • • • • • • • • . · • • -• • • • . ~ · • • • • . • . . • • . • • • • • . . • • • • . . . • • )\/Qa) -3 Framing Size , • • • • • , • • • • • • • • • , • • , • • ,. • , • , • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 2.) x: 4: t Date 4 -F(?Jlling Spacing • • • • -~· , • • • • , • • • • • -, , • ·., : , , • • , • • , • • • • • , , , . , • , , , . f {g 5 ·insulation in Cavity • • • · ~ . • •. . • , • • • • • _. • • • • • . • , • • • , • • -. . . • • . , . • . . , • J I , 00 inchef F-tt2..hr/Btu : 6 Effectiv.e A-value of Cavity/Framing , , • ~'::c. •• , ,: ••••• , ••••••••••••••• , , • • • • f?, 3B F-ft2..hr/Btu - Sketc~ of Construction Assembly· List of Construction C<?mponents A· Oesaiption Y'z.i uYf$UM Ba.'2..0 2 g-!l lh\?UkAT!ON 3 ½;1 tYf Sit M .{?pA (20 . -i 4 B C · Wall we· ht (lb/~) 1.,0'h ,41 · '2.,oez D s "fie ~ (Btu'F-lb) ,2:(, I 1.&· E HC Col C xCol D (BtuJFasf) '.54: ,01 ,-st· 5:-.---,-----,------------------.. --------- 6 t 7 8 Total A-Value w/o films • • • • ~ • • • • • • • • • 9, 2f2 Total HC 9 lll$ide surface u film • ~ • • • • , • • • • • • • • · , (e 2? 10 Outside surface air tile • • . • • • • • • • • • • .-• ~ , {e [? 11 Total thennal resistance (Rt) • • • • • • • • • • • • l O, l, 27 12· U-value(r/Une11),".· •••••• ,,,,. ~.; · ,O'J :/ ' Form ·Revised Se_Ptember 1986 '·Page.:..__. ot -·· _ .•-. Construction Assembly Compliance Form -CF-3 . . . .. . .. . ~ --..... Jf ~ MAf4 A1f?fogr PcAU. -@c; B. . For Enforcement Agency U111 Only ......... . ~/ . . t;.P. ·. . {p3/> b7 Oocumentation Al.llhoC'/Finn · · 1 ~By General Information ) . 1 AIHmbly Type and Humble' • • • • • ~ • .-, • • • • ~ , • • • , • • • , • • • • • • • • • • • , • . l2o?f' 2 Framing Type , • , -.• • • • • .: • • • ~. • , • • • • • -. • • • , • • , • , , • , • • • • , •. -• , ,. , \VMP ~ .. -- 3 Fnuning _Size •• , ••• , •• : •••• , , , ••• , • , , •. , • , ••••••• , •••• : .-• : • , 2-;-.& 4. Frilning ~g ••••• , •. , • ,= _, • , , •• -, • ·, , , ••• , •• , , , •••••••• , ." ~~inchll . 5 Insulation in Cavity • • • , • • • • _ • • ~ • , • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • •. • • • , • • • 'A F-ft2-hr/8tu 6 Effective R-value of Cavity/Framing • • • • , • • • • • , • • • • • • • • • • • , • , • , , • • . ; , • • 'A F-ft2-hr/6tU . Sketch of Construction· Assembly List of Construction Components A . . _ · , . 0-.aiption . 1 3/tz 6u1L1-ue &?efJN~ 2 . · 0Y-t f1;(Wo;p ?1:!f?AJJ-\·1~G . 3 ·· A I ~ '5f .A?l:f , · f-(9 ttssu!ATwJ , -. .,,~ B R-value ,3? , (p1,_ f c;; .. t2-00 ., .. C 'O E Wall s 'fie ' . HC We~t cs~): Col C xCol D (ltvft (Btu/F~af) fJ.. 1.o . ~ 3S"". ,]] !,'1:l 11-9 : I t\'L t}_~ <I. ,20 ' 5 . ~it'' "$U7 .. '.AfeY?T l?AL Il~E- ~f 1f2 l, ~9 l ,44-. ~-3-\' \,_.,.·. 6 7 a Total R-Value w1~ filml • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 2/2.. 7 I i Inside SUrface air.fim • , , •••.••.•• , • , • • , b\ · 10 Outside aunac:e ... ~ • • • • •· • • • • • • • • • . • /11 11 Torai thlttna rtuarice (Rt) • • • • ; • •. ; • • • • 2?, 5 5 12 U-value (1'/ Uni 11) • : • • • • • • • • • • , • • • • . ., 04!l_ : Total HC: ' ).&:r I ,_ ... ·::·-. ~ -\;~~~ : . .. ., . ·-~ .. · .Paa._._ ot._~_ ·--~ . CF-3 Construction Assembly Compliance Form PAl,ii MA g. A1P::f e f?.T PLAZA --La r o For Enforcement Agency Use Only Pr~ 1t1e . Documentation Author/Firm Data Checked By Date General Information 1 Asa~bly Ty_pe and Number • • : • • • • • , • · • , , , • • • • • · • • , , • , , • • • • , • , • ,. ·, .~ · 2 :Fra.nung Type • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • ~ • • .. • . • • • • • • . • . . • • • ~ 4 Framing Spacing • • -. •. • • • • • • _ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • inches ... - 3 F~ing Size • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • .• • • • • • • • • • • • • ~ 5 Insulation in Cavity • ~ • , • • • • . • ~. • • • ., • , • • • •. • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • · F-ft2-hr/8bJ 6 Effective R-value of Cavity/Framing • , • • """· , • , : • • • • , • • , , • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . F-ft2-hr/8tu Sketch of Construction Assembly Ust of Construction Components A O~ption 1 ' . 3j. II · : 1 }\: \,\JQf O. Dootz. 2 3 4 5 : . 6 t 7 B R-value \.:}(p 8 Total R-Value w/o films • • • • • • , • • , • • • • L 9 (q 9 Inside surlace u film • ~ • • , • , • • • • , • • , , (pf? 10 Outslde surface air file •••••••••••••• ; , I J 11 Total .lhenn~ resistanoe (Rt) • • • • • • • • • • • • 'l, 2, \ 12 U;value(1'/Une.11) •• · ••••••••••• ,·,. ,?;> Form Revis~ September 1986' C Wall we· ht (lb'~ 4.0 0 . s 'fie ~at (Btu/F-lb) I <J \ Total HC E HC ColCxColO (Btu/F-sf) '3.&t Page __ ot ___ _ ' ·--~-· \_.-· HVAC Power Indices Summary Form and Worksheets CF-4 . K f?AlotMtl ·AtC2:Pot2.{ ~:i< f¥: Lor, '6 ForEnforcementAgencyU~Only Project Tide · · toeM\3S I M0~, ,,A &11Js/rz1 Doc:1.mentation Aulhor/Fll'lii O ·.1 C~ecked By Date Summary Data 1 . Concltionld Floor Area • • • • • . • • : • • ~. • , , : • • • • , • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ~fu tt2 2 Total Fan Watts Owing Peak Cooling Conditions (from Worksheets below) • • • • • • • • · • • • • • ', • • • 3.S kilowatts 3 Fan Wattage Index (Line 2x 10<?0 I U~ 1) , •••••• -•• , •• , • , , ••• , , •••• , , , • , • ,?0 Watts/ft~ 4 . Total HVAC Splltffl Energy During Pe~ Cooling Conditions (from Worksheets below) , • , , • , • • , · , , __ _ 5 Cooling Power Index (Line 4 x 1000 / Une 1) ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• · , __ _ 6 Total HVAC Sysllm Energy During Peak He.fog Conditions (from Worksheets below) • • , , , • • • , • • ___ _ 7 Healing Power Index (Une 6 x 1000 / ~ 1) • • • • , • • • • • , , • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ._ __ _ Fan Energy A B C 0 E F G H kBtUlhr' Btu/hr-tt2 kBtulhr Btulhr-tt2 Brake Horsepower Motor x Drive Efficiency Peak kilowatts Conversion Number J Equipment Mark Oesc:riplion Cooling Heating Cooling Heating Factor Fans CQOling .Heating i:lf.! ' ... PJ VMi U~A-r Vi /MP ~~ _£.A •~ti; ,!Ao ~1'111~ 0.746-9-, ,z, 9Y? u!l-9 l1 II It J~·o .. ·10· 0.7"6: 1 ,6~ : 0.746': 0.7-46 0.746 0.746 0.746 0.746 0.746 Total kilowatts .:.,,61 Heating an~ Cooling ·Equipment A B . C 0 E F G H J . Cooling Heating Equipment _Design Conversion Source Design Conversion Source Mark . Description 'Output Efficiency Factor kBtulhr OJtput Efficiency Factor kBtulhr . na All F.ans na 10.239 na 10.239 From Wotksheet Abova .. ' : .. ! : -· : : i t ·• I Total Total· Form rlevisad September 1986 P~ge ___ ot __ Lighting Summary and Workshe-et (Part :1 ot 2) _ f4.~wAt2: Ai(lfolZT fuu -Lor 8 ProJE)Ct 1tle Coo(Y1b; )MJG:;~1 tTA {J1.5/8] CF-5 For Enforcement Agency Use Only Documen1alion Auth6r/Finn Date ' Proposed Adjusted LPD Total l;klilding Watts (CF-5) ••••• · •• ,10 31...0 Watts 2 Control Credit Watts (WS-58) • • • • • • -~ -Watts 3 A~usted Watts (Line 1 -Line 2) • • • • • .IO. 3Zo Watts _ 4 Concitioned Floor Area , , : , • , • • • _ • &?;{69 tt2 5 Adjusted LPD (Line 3 / Line 4) • • • • • : • \-, 2 Watts/ft2 _ _, llluminanpe Categories G, H, and I ·e Luminaire Reference in Reference Constn.ic1ion C Code Documents ' Luminaire Description ' ' ' -- Form Revised September 1986 .. Checked By Date Tailored LPD Approach (when applicabfe) 1 Watts for IC: A-DIE (WS-SC) • , -. • • • ~ Wa~ 2 Task Watts for IC: E & F (WS-SD) , • • • , -Watts 3 Non-Task Watts for IC: E & F (WS-SD) ,_ , --+---Watts 4 Task Watts for IC: G, H & I .(WS-5E) • • • • Watts 5 Non-Task Watts for IC: G, H & I (WS-5Ef. '---+--Watts 6 Retail/Wholesale Store Lighting (WS-SF) • , Watts 7 Total Allowed Watts (lines 1-6) , • • , • -, --+--Watts· 8 Conditioned Floor Area , • , • , • , , , --t---tt2 9 Maximum LPD (Line 7 I Line 8) , ; ; • • ·--+--Watts/ft2 D E F Number of Watts per Luminaire Total Luminaires (incl. ballast) Watts -- . ' -- ' • ' Page Total Building Total Page __ ot __ ' J.. ************ ******* SCM ENERGY ANALYSIS MODEL **"'·******?'t-** **·***-lHE- ** DEVELOPED BY ADM ASSOCIATES, INC. ** ***~************************************************ FILE NAME- ·BUILDING TYPE BUILDING TITLE AREA (SO. FT. ) ·X-***·lf-·X--l(·****·M-·M· :: pabp81 PRIMf-)RY DATA _,l(·*·***·lE-****·** *~* OFFICE *** Pf:~LOM(~R;:-(-U HPORT BUS. PAF<l-<. EXTERIOR WALL . . . . • •.• . • • . . . . . . . . • . . . • . . •. . . . . . . . . . . . . • . ,-::'.bO -WINDOW NOFHH/NORTHE{-4ST . . • •.• . . • . . . • . . . . • . . • . . • . . . . . . ;:::OO EAST /SOUTHEAST .••••••.•.•.•.••...•..••. : ... -120 SOUTH/ SOUTHWEBT • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 40 · WEST /NORTHWEST., •••••.•..••..••...... ~ .•... 0 . RQOJ= • • • • • a • ~ • • • • : 111 •• • • • • :. • • • • 11 • •· 111 a III N 111 • • 111 • • a s, " 1,1 • • IC 11 ~ • • • •• 6:3() GR-QUND FL.DOR •...••••• !' •••••• ,. ••••.•••••• ,. ......... " ~ • • • t;3(> TOTAL CONDITIONED FLOOR ....... ~ •••....•••..••••...... 630 'R' -VALUE (EXCLUDIN(-:} FILM RESISH-)NCES) ************************************** WALLS • • " 111 111 111 • ,. • • • 111 • 111 • • • • ., a • 111 • • • ., ,• • • • • M a. M • • • • • • • • "' ,. • 111 .. • LJ. • £3 WINDOW <INCLUDING INSIDE FILM RESISTANCE> ......•...... 9 ROOF • a • ·• • a, • rt • a a • • • 11 a • 1111 • a • a ,r • • • a ,; a • a III a • • • • a 1r • • • • • ,a • • 1,1 a 23,, e:_( FL .. QQR • 11 a a lll a a • • ,. -. • • • a • a II • 11 11 u M • a :it • • • • • a a 11 • ,r ;a a a •· ,c a a • u .-• a. (:) HVAC SYSTEM **·*-K·**·*·lE--);·** HEATING EQUIPMENT TYPE COOLING EQUIPMENT TYPE JII N N a N a a N a a JII J11 a a a J11 J11 a a a J11 JII JII JII ff a 11 ~ JII JII JII ECONOMIZER •••••••• ,; •••••. , ••••• _ ••••••• : ••••.•• ,. •••• ~ •.• · FAN.POWER (WATTS/SQ.FT.> •....•.•.••••...•.....•...... AIR CIRCUU-HION 'RATE (CF-M/SQ. FT.) •••••••••••••••••••• ·OTHER ***** HEAT PUMP 1'.:!If~ CONDITIONER NO i:;;-• ...J 1. 25 AZIMUTH OF NORTHERN BUILDING ORIENTATION ••.••••..•..• 0 SHADING COEFtICIENT •.•••..•.••.....•..•.•..••...•..... 65 ~EAT CAPACITY OF EXT. WALL (BTU/F-SQ.FT.) ...••..•..•• 15.6 LIGHTING LEVEL (WATTS/SQ. FT.) • ~ ..•..•...•.•..•••....• 1. 5 FLOOR --rvt=•E • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . .. • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • S1LAB CLIMAl .. E ZONE ...•••• ·-·. • .....•..•.••••......••.•..•.... 7 PAGE 1 J. ************ SCM ************ ******* ENERGY ANALYSIS MODEL ******* ** pEVELOPED BY ADM ASSOCIATES, 'INC. ** **************************************************** PHYSICAL PARAMETERS ***~*************** SECONDf-1RY DATf'.:i *********'!!#*** DOOR DOOR WALL ROOF t:) REA .. (SQ. F.:-r. ) ............................. " . • • . . . • • .. • • . • . 2(:> 'R'-VALUE (EXCLUDING FILM RESISTANCES) ••..•......•...•. 1.96 ABSO Rr:•T Iv r ·rv . ., ... ~ ..... " ....... N ~· •• K ...... N •• ; .......... " • ,, • 7 . . A BSD Rf::11 .. IV I 1 .. Y •••••••••••••• N lC •• " II .......... , • M ...... _ _. ••• " • • 5 CEIL r NG 1-JE r GH-r < F.T. > ••••• , •• N ••••••••••••• ,: ••••• " •••••••••• _ • e SHADING "*·**··**** SHADING COEFFICIENT NORTH/NOFHHEAST EAST /SOUTHEAST ....................••. : SOUTH/SOUTH!,,JEST .................•..•.. : WEST /NORTHWEST ..•.................... DOES TH IS =BU I LD,I NG HAVE WINDOW OVE RHJ-':JNGS •••••••••••••••••••• DOES THIS BU~LDING ~AVE W!NDOW SID~-FINS .......•..........•. MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL ************************* . p5 • E,5 • 65 ..-i:::-' • b...J YES NO .·RATED HEAl~ING EJ=f=-rcIENCY .......................... ar •••••• ~ ••• 2; RATED COOLING EER ...........••.....•.•...................... 9 WAT~R HEATER TYPE ......................••..............•.... ELECTRIC SPECIAL FEATURES ******·lH(·******** DAYLIGHT1NG STRATEGIES •...••.•••.•••••••...•••.•• ~ ........•. NO SOLAR WATER :HEATING SYSTEM .i ••• ~ •••••••••••••••••••••••••••• NO .PAGE 2 .J. ·IE-*****-X·***** SCM ***********·* ENERGY ANALYSIS MODEL ******* DEVELOPED BY ADM ASSOCIATES, INC. ** **************************************************~* OVERHAN~ CHARACTERISTICS (FT. r *********************~******** NORTH/NORTHEAST WIN DOW HEIGHT ........•............. · ...... . OVERHANG HEIGHT FROM BASE OF I-JI NDOW •••• · ••• OVERHAi'TB EXTENSION FROM WINDOW ••• , ••••••••• EAST /SOUTHEAST: WINDOW HEIGHT •.•••........................ SOUTH/SOUTHWEST OVERHANG HE I GH-C.:rc FROM BASE OF WINDOW : ••••••• OVERHANG EX TENS I ON FROM W i NDOW •••••.•••• · ••• WINDOW 1-tE I GI-IT ... M •••• ~ •••••••••••••••••••••• OVERHANG HEIGHT FRO~ BASE OF WINDOW· ......• OVERHANG EXTENStON FROM WINDOW••••-;••••••• WEST / NORTHWEST : WINDOW HEIGHT .............................. . OVERHANG HEIGHT FROM BASE OF WINDOW ••••••• OVERHANG ~XTENSION FROM ~nNDm,J ••••• · •••• : ••• PAGE 7. ..., - 8 ,, 8. ,::· ,_I r::-~J B B • .:: ,.J ,::.-,.J 8 8. 5 5 8 8. i.:;-,.J ,::;· ,..J • I a ************ SCM ************ ******* ENERGY ANALYSIS MODEL ******* ** DEVELOPED BY ADM ASSOCIATES, INC. ** **************************************************** FIXED DATA ********** SCHEDULING '*'******'*·*~· OCCUPANCY LEVEL FOR OPERATIONAL PERIODS (FRAC"(J:ON) : I~f)Y . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-l.6 N r e1-1·rs •••••••••••• " •••••• p .. .. • C>38 I (.'.lVERAGE LIGHTING AND RECEPTACLE L-EVEL FOR OPERATIONAL PERIODS : (FRACTION) :DAY PERIOD •••••••••••• 703 :NIGHT PERIOD ••....••.• .156 EG!UIV<-1LENT OPERATIONAL HOURS PEH YEAf~ :LIGHTING <Df-=lYS) ..•••• 2915 :LIGHTING <NIGHTS) .... 359 :RECEPTACLE .. ; •...•... 3274 : F~lNS ••••••••••••• ;. • • 4-518 :Wf-HEF< HEATER ••••••••• 1T70 NUMBER OF NON-OPERATIONAL HOURS PER W~EK DA'Y J:1{=: ~ I (J1) •• • ••• 11 ................................. " • • • • • • 32 N I,GH T i=1E R~I OD , ., • . • • • • " . • . . • • • • • • .-• . -· ii, • • R • .. • • • •· • • • • • • .. • • • L1-6 NUMBER OF HOLIDAYS DURING HEATING SEASON ...••......•.....••• 7 NUMBER OF Hrn_IDAYS DURING COOLING $EASON .................... 3 SET-·POINT TEMPERATURE (F) : WINTER • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 70 WI NTEf-< SETBACK • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • L~O PHYSICAL PARAMETERS ********·"**·*·'*·*******' INS1DE FILM RESISTANCE: SUMMER SUMMER WALLS 78 SE Tll~:, ....• " .......... ,., " .•. 85 .• 68 : ROOF . .• • • • • • •. • • . • . • • • • • . . . . • . • . . . • • . • 76 : FLOOR •.•••.•..•.•.••.....•••..... · . . • 76 VENTILATION RATE (CFM/SQ.FT~ > ~ ••••••••••••••••.••••.••••••••.• 13 INFILTRATION RATE DURING ~ON-OPERATIONAL HOURS (CFM/SQ.FT. > •• 0284 SLAB FLOOR: 'U'-VALUE <BTU/HR-SQ.FT0 -F) .•...••......••....••.. 0862 , INTERNAL LOAPS AND ENERGY, t************************* RECEf:1I"ACLE ~1EAK LOAD <WAT .. rS/SG!. FT. ) • • • • • • • . • .. . . . . . . • • . . . • . . • • 5 WATER: HEATING (BTU/SQ. FT. /YEAR) •• ,. .•.•.............. · ....•.•. 64 f:1EOl=•LE SENSIBLE LOAD (B·ru/~·JR/~1ERSON) ·• · ......................... 23(> PEOPLE LATENT LOAD CBTU/HR}PERSON) ••• ~ •....••......••....•.. 190 A REA PER PE f~SON <SQ. FT. /PERSON) • • • . . • • . . • . . • • . . . . . • • . . . • . . . • .250 PAGE 4 *******'****** SCM ,Jli·-K·*-K·****'*''*'*** ******** ENERGY:ANALYSIS MODEL ******** *** COPYRIGHT 1985, CALIFORN1A ENERGY COMMISSION*** .CLIMATE ZONE 7 DATE: oa-o~-1987 BUILDING FILE BUILDING TYPE BUILDING TITLE .: PABP81 *** .OFFICE *** PALOMAR AIRPORT BUg. PARK BALANCE-POINr TEMPERATURES AND DEGREE-DAYS INPUT ----------·----. ---·------.,. --------------------------·-·-- DAY: NIGHT _____ , ___ .. __________ , ....... _ .. · BPT1 -~53. 31 BPTl ·-67. BPT2 = 58. 92 BPTE: 75. BPT3 -58. 92 BPT3 -75. HDD -24. ~(2 HDD -· 3(>~2. Cl)D = 1306. 26 CDD - ENVELOPE HEAT TRANSFER FACTORS (BTLJ/HR-F) -----=----------------~----~-------------OVERALL BUILDING ENVELOPE HEAT TRANSFER RATE (WINTER) OVERALL HEAT TRANSFER FACTOR 'K' (WINTER) OVERALL BUILDI~G ENVELOPE ~EAT TRANSFE~ ~ATE (SUMMER) OVERALL HEAT TRANSFER FACTOR 'K' (SUMMER> HEATING COOL.ING ANNUAL LOADS (MBTU~S) ---------------------------------------.- ANNUAL SITE ENERGY REQUIREMENTS (MBTU'S> ======================================== SITE HEF,.)TING SITE COOL.ING SITE LIGl'-ITING SITE RECEPTACLE SITE FAN Sii"E HOT WATER o. ... ,i:= ~,_J 4l L} :l i::!5 EA ANNUAL SOURCE EN~RGY USE ESTIMATE <KBTU/SQ:FT.) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------SOURCE·HEATING SOURCE COOLING SOURCE LIGHTING SOURC~ RECEPtACLE SOURCE FAN SOURCE HOT WATER 471, 5 383.4 469,4 2. () (). 7= G.O :t.O. 5 3.5 4. '3 (). 3 3. 4. i::!8. 5 ::r(>. 3 16.8 23.1 1. 4 ====== ======== ======================-============= ===========. TOTAL ANNUAL SOURCE ENERGY USE ESTitr1ATE 123. 5 !~BTU/SQ. FT.· -----------------------------------=-----------------. --------- ( NOT~: 1 KWH= 10.239 KBTUS OF SOURCE ENERGY) PAGE 5 _. *******-K·**** SCM ·*********·lE-** ******* ** ENERGY ANALYSIS MODEL ******* DEVELOPED BY ADM ASSOCIATES, INC. ** **************************************************** .FILE NAME BUILDING TYPE BUILDING TITLE AREA (SQ.FT.) *·************ P(-=tBPBi:=~ Pl~ I MARY Df-)TA ****·***·*·**** : *** OFFICE *** PALOMA~·AIRPORT BUS. PARK EXTERIOR WINDOW WALL •••••••••••• : •••• ., • ., ••••• _ •••••••••••••••• NORTH/NORTHEAST ..•••..••.•.......•.•.•.....• EAST /SOUTHEAST ..••••..••.•••....••..•....•. 180 40 120 : SOUTH/ SOUTHWEST •.••..•.• ~ • • • . . . • . . • . . . . . . . . • 0 : .WEST /NORTHWEST .. . . • • . . . • • • • . • . • . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . 0 ROOF ...... -......................................................... . 630 GROUND FLOOR ..•... ; •..... ~ ......••..•................ 630 TOTAL CONDITIONED FLOOR .•.......•....•............... 630 'R'-VALUE (EXCLUDING FILM RESJSTANCES) ************************************** WALLS • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • N If • • • • • ;r • • • • • ,; • st • • • • ,c i, " a L~ • 8, WINDOW <INCLUDING INSIDE FILM RESISTANCE> ...•.....••.• 9 ROOF" •••••••••••••••••••• " •••••••••••••••••• ., •• " •.•• " ., 22;. ::; · FJ_QQ R • • • • • • : .. • • • • '\ • • • • • • • II ,c • II • • 111 • • a 1111: • • w, • • • • a • • • • • a • • • • () HVAC SYSTEM *********** HEATING EQUIPMENT TYPE COOLING EQUIPMENT TYPE ••• • .• -.... , ••••• , •• , ........ ti •••••••• ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• If • ECONOMl_ZER· •••• " •••••• ~ .... · •••••••••••••...••••••....•• HEAT PU.MP f-=tIR CONDITIONER NO . . F(.."ll\l J:1OWER (WA"'fl""S/SQ. F-.r·. ) ; •••••••• • • • • • • • • • .. • • • • • • • • • • • 5 AIR CIRCUL(-1TION RATE (CFM/SQ-.FT.) •••••••••••••••••••.• 1.25 :JJTHER ***** AZIMUTH OF NORTHERN BUILDING ORIENTATION ...•.•....•.• 0 SHAD I NG COEFFICIENT ...•....••••••.•.•.....•......••.. HEAT CAPACITY OF EXT. WALL (BTU/F-SQ.FT.) .•...•...•• ~ LIGHTING LEVEL (WATTS/SQ.FT.) ••••.... ·._ ..••.........• ·• F·LOOR. TYl=1E •.••.••••••••••••••••••••••• · •••••••••...•••• CLIMATE ZONE ......... ~ ... • ........................... . PAGE 6 • 65 15.6 1.5 SLAB 7 .. ************ SCM ************ ******* ENERGY ANALYSIS MODEL ******* ** DEVELOPED BY ADM ASSOCIATES, INC. ** **************************************************** PHYSICAL PARAMETERS ******************* SECONDf..)RY DATA *****·**-K·*-K·.t-K·** . . ~-' DOOR ( .. )REA ( SG). FT• ) • • 11 • • • • • • • • # • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 11 11 N 11 • • ,: n • • 2() DOOR ' R' -VAUJE <EXCLUDING FILM RES I STAi\JCES) . . . . . . . . • • . . . • . . . L 96 !,JALL f'..)BSO RPT IV I TY ••••••••• ~ •••• ~ ••.••.•••••••.•.••• · • .-_-•. .-. • . • 7--~ , . RC10F ABSQ Rf-'T IV I l:Y • • • • • • w • • 11 ;. • • • • • • • "• • • •-~ • • • • • • a III a ll • • w 11: • • • 11 • • • • u 5 CEIL I NG HEIGHT (FT. ) •••••••.•••••••••• • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 8 SHADING ***-*·*** SHADING COEFFICIENT NORTH/NORTHEAST EAST /SOUTHEAST SOUTH/ SOUTH!,JEST WEST /1\!0f-Hl·-lvJEST •••••a•a•·•u•~•uu11aux•u11 DOES THIS BUILDING HAVE WINDOW OVERHANGS DOES THIS BUILDING HAVE WINDOW SIDE-FINS MECHANICAL AND ELECTFUCAL ************************* N 65 • 65 • 65 YES ND RATED HEATING EFFICIENCY .. : ......................... ; •...... 3 RAT~D COOLING ~ER WATER HEATER TYPE SPEtIAL FEATURES *****·*********** ••••••••• '!I ••••••••.••••• ;. ••••••••••••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • r • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ' . ' ! 9 ELECTRIC DAYLIGHTING STRATEGIES'. •••••••••..••••••••••••• · ••••••. ·/ •••••• NO SOLAR WATER HEATING SYSTEM •••••..•.•••.•..•..••...•....•..•• NO PAGE 7 .. ************ SCM ************ ******* ENERGY ANALYSIS MODEL ******* ** DEVEL9P~D BY ADM ~SSOCIATES, INC. ** ****************'*·*******************************-l<-*** OVERHANG CHARACTERISTICS (Ft.) ****************************** NORTH/ NO RTHE(.'.:JST. EAST /SOUTHEAST SOUTH/SOUTHWEST WEST iNORTHWESi WINDOW HEIGHT • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 8 OVE f~I-IANG HE; I GHT F f<OM . F;<ASE OF WINDOW ...•.•• ; 8. ~; OVERi-1(.'.:JNG EXTENSION FROM WINDOW . . . . . . . . • • • . 5 WINDOW HEIGHT • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • B OVERHANG HE I Gl·f!:.:.-FROM B(.:iSE OF WINDOW . •. • • . • . 8. 5 OVERHANG EXTENSION FROM WINDOW ......•..... 5 WINDOW HEIGi-fl" ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •. • • • • • 8 OVERHANG HEIGHT FROM BASE OF WINDOW ••••••• 8.5 OVERHANG EXTENSION FROM WlNDOW •.........•. 5 w r NI)OW HE r 0~ .. 1-r .. -. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a OVERHANG HEIGHT FROM BASE OF WINDOW ....... 8.5 OVE f~!-:IANG EX TENS I t1N FROM W 1. NDDW ••.••• : • • • . •. 5 PAGE 8 .. ************ SCM **"*·**"*·****·*'*· ******* ENERGY ANALYSIS· MODEL ******* ** DEVELOPED BY ADM ASSOCIATES, INC. ** **************************************************** FIXED DATA ***·****·*** SCHEDULING '*·********-IC· OCCUPANCY LEVEL FOR OPERATIONAL PERIODS (FRACTION)· : fJf!Y. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 416 : NI Gl-11-s, .• -•• ,. ••••• ,, " ••••••••. AVERAGE LIGHTING AND RECEPTACLE L£VEL FOR OPERATIONAL PE:RIODS <FRACTION) :DAY PEfUOD •..•.•... .: . ·:NIGHT PERIOD ••••••••• EQUIVALENT OPERATIONAL HOURS PER YEAR :LIGHTING <DAYS) ...•.• :LIGHTING <NIGHTS) •.•. ; RECEPTACLE •••••••• ·• ; _- : FANS 1t ,. • • • 11 • • • • • • • • • ~ a :WATER HEATER ••.•... ;. NUMBER OF NON-OPERATIONAL HOURS PER WEEK D(...)Y J:1Ef~IO[> ••••••••••••••••• "'.,. ••.•••••••••••••• N •••••• II a; i\f I ,Gt-IT ~-=·E~ R I~DI) •...•..•.. •· ..•.• , • II ••••• ,._ Ill< "· ........... M· •••••••••• . 038 • 703 • 156 ;:=~915 359 3i;:'.74 4518 1770 46 NUMBER OF HOLIDAYS DURING HEATING SEASON .................... 7 NUMBER OF HOLIDAYS DURING COOLING SEASON ...••..•.•....•..••. 3 SET-POINT TEMPERATURE (F) : WINTER • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 70 PHYSICAL PARAMETERS ******************* : WINTER BUMMER SUMMER Sl?-T"l3ACi·{ II •••• ., " ••• u " ••• " •• Sf~TUP 40 78 85 I NS I DE FILM HES I STANCE : WALL"S . • . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . • . . . . . .. . . 68 : ROOF ••• ~ • , ......................... ~ . " 76 F·LooR ••••.••• _ ........ ; .••••••••••• ~ • . 76 VENTILATION RATE (CFM/SQ.FT.) •......•....•. ~ ...........•..... 13 INF1LTRA1ION RATE DURING NON~OPERATIONAL HOURS <CFM/SQ.FT.·> .. 0284 SLAB· FLOO.R 'U' -·W1LUE <BTU/HR-!-SQ. FJ. ·-F) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0862 INTE,RN~)L LOAIYS AND ENERGY, ************************* RECEPTACLE PEAK LOAD (WATTS/SQ.FT.) ..•. ~ ••••...•..••....•••.• 5 WATEH HEATING (BTU/SQ.FT. /YEAR) ••••• ~ •••.•••••••••••••••••••• 64 PEOPLE SENSIBLE LOAD (~TU/HR/PERSON) ...............•......•. 230 PEOPLE LATENT LOAD {BTU/HR/PERSON) ...•.....•..•.....•....••. 190 AREA. l=1ER l=1ERSON (SQ. FT. /l=1ERSDN) • • • • • • . • . • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • 25(> PAGE 9 ... **********·lH(·* ******** SCM ************* ENERGY ANALYSIS MODEL *****~** *** COPYRIGHT CLIMATE ZONE BUILDING FILE BUILDING TYPE BUILDING TITLE 1985, CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION*** 7 DATE : 08-03-1987 PABP82 *** OFFICE *** PALOMAR AI~PORT BUS. PARK BALANCE-POINT TEMPERATURES AND DEGREE-DAYS INPUT ==========·=== ~=== ============-=============== DAY NIGHT _ .. ____ .. ________ ---·--- BPT1 -51. <)3 -:::;; BPT1 -55. BPT2 = 56. 48 BPT2 --74-. BPT:3 -t'56-. 48 BPT:3 -74. HDD = o. 00 HPD = 2813. CDD = 184i::'.. 22 CDD - ENVELOPE HEAT TRANSFER FACTORS (BTU/HR-Fl -· ----. ·----·-----------------________ .... _ ........... _ ...... -..... _., ____ _ OVERALL BUILDING ENVELOPE HEAT TRANSFER RATE (WINTER) OVGRAL~ HEAT TRANSFER FACTOR~~, (WINTER> OVERALL BUILDING ENVELOPE HEAT TRANSFER RATE (SUMMER) OVERALL HEAT T~ANSFER F8CTOR ~K' (SUMMER> HE~-iTING COOLING ANNUAL LOADS tMBTU'S) ===============~===== ANNUAL SITE ENERGY REQUIR~MENTS (MBTU'S) =============== ~-=~=====-==~~~===~-=== SI TE· HE.AT I NG SIT.E COOLING SITE LIGHTING SITE RECEPTACLE SITE FAN SITE HOT WATER 1. 60 83 83 27 00. ANNUAL SOURCE ENERGY· USE ESTIMATE (KBTU/SG!. FT.) ===================~ ==========-======--===--J= StlURCE HEATING . SOUl~CE COOLING SOURi:;E LIGHTING SOL!.R~E RECEPTr~CLE SOUHCE FAN SOURCE HOT WATER 197.5 2'3C),c 8 1 '99. 9 285. '-3 1. 1 -, • ';51 c-.... .;.:: ..__1,: ..... , 10.6 3.5 (). 3 1.8 26.2 5(>. 3 16. a· 23. l 1.4 -------------------------------------------------------------.--- TOTAL ANNWAL SOURCE ENERGY USE tSTIMATE 119.5 KBTU/SQ.FT. =======· =====================· === -=========' ====================== NOT~: 1 KWH= 10.239 KBTUS OF. SOURCE ENERGY J PAGE 10 ,, ****'*'******* SCM ******* *"*' ENERGY ANALYSIS MODEL DEVELOPED BY ADM ASSOCIATES, INC. ****-K··X·*· *·X" **************************************************** FILE NAME BUILDING.TYPE BUILDING TITLE AREA (SQ.FT.) ************* : PiqBP83: PRIMARY DATA *******-J<:·i-*·** : *** OFFICE *** : PALOMA~ AIRPORT BUS. PARK 'EXTERIOR W~)LL· •••.•••.•• •· •.•• ,.. • •••••• .,.,. .•.••• ., . .. • . • • . 1.8() WINDOW NORTHiNORTl·-!E(.ciST •. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • L~O EAST /SOUTHEAST ...•.............•.•........• 120 SOUTH/ SOUTHvJEST • • • • • • • •. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1.~o :_WEST /NORTHWEST .....•• ~ ...•........•........ 0 · ROOF •....•..••.. II II ••••••••• ,; •••••••••• Ill • i ••••••• "' ••• II u ~;-~~(=) GROUND FLOOF~ ..•..••........ -· ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 730 TOTAL CONDITIONED FLOOR .....••..•...•......•.....•... 730 '1 R' -VhLUE CEX-CL.UDING FILM RESISTANCES) ************************************** Y,lALLS •• , ••••••••••••••• M ......... " ........ ,. ••••• "' ,, ••• 111 • ,. II .. 4-. 8 WINDOW <INCLUDING INSIDE FILM RESISTANCE) .•.....••.... 9 ROOF. ., •••••• ., •••••••• ·• ,. ••••••••••••••• ,. •..••• ., ••••• u • ,. f:3" 5 FLOOR ... · .....•••••....... -............•..........•....• -0 HVf'..)C SYSTEM **-l<:·-l(·*******· HEATING EQUIPMENT TYPE COOLING EQUIPMENT TYP~ • • • • • i • • • • • • • • • ~ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • HEf'..ff PUMP ?UR CONPITIONER ECONOM I zE·R ••••.••••••••••••• · •••.• ,, •••• ,, .•• ,, •••• = • • • • • • • J\!O FAN POWtR (WATTS/SQ.FT.) .. ~ ••..••....•....•.......•.•. 5 AIR-CI RCULAi"ION RATE (CFM/S·G'!:. FT. )- OTH~R ·***** . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., " . . ~ . . 1.1 AZI~UTH OF NOATHERN BUILDINB ORIENTATION .••.•••...... 0 SHADING COEfFICIENT •...•...••....••••....•.••.•...... HEAT CAPACITY OF EXT. WALL (BTU/F-SQ.FT.) •••.•.•...•. LIGHTING LEVEL <WATTS/SQ. FT.) •.•.•••.•.•...•....•..•.• .-65 FLOOR TYPE ...•.•..•....•....•••..•..•........ _-. . . . . . . . SLAB Cl--I ti-1ATE ZONE . • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • . • • • • • • • • • • • • . 7 PAGE 11 ****·liHf****** SCM ·******* ·** ENERGY ANALYSIS MODEL DEVE~OPED BY ADM ASSOCIATES, INC. ***~;*'*·* ** **************************************************** . - PHYSICAL PARAMETERS ******************* SECOND(-=!RY DATA *-l<.'*******~1-*** DOOR.AREf4 (SQ;FT.) -~ ••••••••••••• -••••••••••••••••••.••••••••• 20 DOOR 'Rj-VALUE (EXCLUDING FILM RESISTANCES> ................. 1.96 WALL: FlBSORPT-IVITY ••••••••• ~ ............................. ; •••••.•• 7 C HOOF · (.:iBSO f~P Tr VI TY . ~ ....•.. _-•••••.•....•.•.•.................. • ·.J CEIL I NG HEIGHT (FT. ) .: •••••••• ·• • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 8 SHADING '******·* SHADING COEFFICIENT NORTH.I NORTHEAST EAST /SOUTHEAST SOUTH/SOUTHWEST WEST /NORTHWEST ........................ 65 DOES THIG BUIL:DING HAVE WINDOl-J OVERHANGS • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • YES DOES THIS BUILDING HAVE WINDOW SIDE-FINS ........•........... NO MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL ************************* RATE"D HEATING EFFICIENCY .· •.......•.......................... ~; RA1·Eo cooLr NG EE-:r~ •..•••••••••••••••• _. • • • • • • • • • . • • • . • • • • • • • • • ,3 WATER HEATER TYPE ......•••....•..••..••......•.............• ELECTRIC SPECIAL FEATURES *t************** bAYLIGHTING STRATEGIES •••••••••..••..••..•••..••••..••..•... NO ' SO~AR WATER HEATING SYSTEM•••••••••••··~··•••••••••••••••••• NO PAGE 12 ************ SCM **·lE-*-X··li-·*-l<··l(·*** -lE·*·X·**** ******* ENERGY ANALYSIS MODEL ** DEVELOPED BY ADM ASSOCIATES, INC. ** **************************************************** · OVERHANS·CHARACTERISTICS (FT.> ****************************** NORTH/NORTHEAST EAST /SOUTHEAST . SOUTH/$0UTHt,JEST WEST /NORTHWEST WINDOW ·HEIGHT . • . • . . . . . . • . • . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • . 8 OVE~HANG HEIGHT FROM BASE OF WINDOW ••••• ·;. 8.5 OVERH(~NG EXTENSION FROM WINDOW • • . . • • . • . . • • 5 WI NDO!,J HEIGHT ............•............ ~ . . . 8 OVERHANG HEIGHT FRUM BASE OF WINDOW.~ ..... OVERHANG EXTENSION FROM WI NDOt,J •••••• : . • . • • 5 B <= • ,.J WINDOW HE I G.HT . ~ ..•..........•...•... ~ . . . . • B OVERHANG HEIGHT FROM Bt'.=lSE OF ~-JINDm..J • • • • • • • 8. ~. OVERHANG EXTENSION FROM WINDOW ....•....... 5 WI NDOt,J HE I (~iHT •••••••••.••••••••••••• ~ ••• ~ • 8 OVERHANG HEIGHT FROM BASE OF WINDOW ....... 8.5 OVERHANG EXTENSION FROM WINDOW ..••...••..• 5 PAGE 13 ************ SCM ENERGY ANALYSIS MODEL ******* *·****** ** DEVELOPED BY ADM ASSOCIATES, INC. ** **************·lE--X·*.**********·**·***·lE--li!·**·X··lE-*-l(·%*****·****·lE-·J.l- SCHEDULING ********** FIXED DATA *****··lE-*-X·** OCCUPANCY LEV~L FOR OPERATIONAL PERIODS (FRACTION) .. : Qt~)'( • If ••••••••••••••••••••••• .,., : i\J I Gt-·rT·s •••••••••••••• Ill ••••••• f.1VERAGE LIGHTING AND RECEPT(~CLE !..:EV.EL FOR OPERATIONAL PERIODS <FRACTION> :DAY PERIOD .•...••...• :N.IGHT PERIOD ..•••••.. EQUiVALtNT OPERATIONAL HOURS PER YEAR :LIGHTING (DAYS) •.•... :LIGHTING (NIGHTS) ... . ~RECEPTACLE ....... ! .. . :: ·F" ANE~ •••• A ••••• Ill u • ,. • J; • : WATEf~ l·-lEr=iT[-:f< ••••••••• NUMBER OF NON-OPERATIONAL HOURS PER WEEK • f+ 16 .038 • 703 • 15b i~':315 35'3 ~i=~74 4-518 1770 D( .. )Y t=:1E:RJQD w••••u•••••• .. ••••••••••••••u•P•••••~'-•••••••u 32 i\f r Gl-i'r i-=·E R r on ........ I!' ,. •••• , .................... " •••••••• ., • • • • .l~6 NUMBER OF HOLIDAYS DURING HEATING SEASON ..•. -..........•.••.. 7 NUMBER OF HOLIDAYS DURING SET-POINT 1EMPERATURE CF) PHYSICAL PARAMETERS ******************* COdLING SEASON ...•.........•.•.... 3 WINTER ·: WINTER SUMMER : SUMMER • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 70 sE-rB1~Ct{ ••..•• Ill ••••• II •• II ... SE .. f'UJ::1 • 11 • N • • 11 • 11 a • 11 • a q U • II • 1111 INSIDE FILM RESISTANCE ~JALLS ,•• .. •nn11••••••••••••••••• .. •••• • 68 ROOF ..... , •••••••. II •••• II • • .. • .. • • .. • .. • • • • '";'6 f=LOOR· .................... »•••••••••••••••• ... 76 VENTILATION RATE (CFM/SQ.FT.) : ••....•. ~ •...............•..... 13 INFILTRATION RATE DURING NON-OPERATIONAL HOURS (CFM/SQ.FT. ~ .• 0284· SLAB FLOOR 'LI' -.VALUE <BTU/HR-SQ. Fi". -F) • . . . . • • • • . . . • • . • • . • • . . • (ll:16i::: . . INTERNAL LOADS ANp ENERGY, ***~i******************** RECEPTf:.)CLE PEAK f:-OAD (WATTS/SQ. FT. ) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 5 WATER HEAT:ING (BTU/SQ. FT. /YEAR) .••••.••....••..•.•....•••.... 64 PEOPLE SENSIBLE LOAD (BTU/HR/PERSON) .•••.. · .•.........•..• · ... 230 PEOPLE LATENT LOAD (BTU/HR/PERSON) .••.•... -.•......•...... ; • . 1 '30 AREA PER PERSON (SQ. FT. /PERSON) .•....••....•.•.....•...•. ;-•. ~ 250 PAGE 14 j, ***'*'*****·**** **·lHE-**,l(··lE- SCM ************* ENERGY ANALYSIS MODEL ******** ¥.··H(· COPYRIGHT CLIMATE ZONE BUILDING FILE BUILDING TYPE BUILDING TITLE 1985, CALIFORNIA ENEf~GY COMMISSION *** 7 DATE : 08-03-1987 PABP83 1 *** ·oFFICE *** PALOMAR AIRPORT BUS. PARK BALANCE-POINT TEMPE~ATURES AND DEGREE-DAYS INPUT. -=~--------------------------------------------- D(~Y NIGHT ------------------ BPT1 49. 92 ~ = BPT1 ·-E,t;. BPT2 = 56. 77 BPT2 = 74-. BPT3 --56. 77 BPT3 --7'-}. HDD --o. 00 HDD --2781. CDD -177c:. 76 CDD - ENVELOPE HEAT TRANSFER FACTORS CBTU/HR-Fl =========~================~==~--===---=== OVERALL BUILDING ENVELOPE HEAT· TRANSFER RATE (WINTER) OVERA~L HEAT TRANSFER F8CTOR '1 (-<' (WINTER> OVERALL BUILDING ENVE~OPE HEAT TRANSFER RATE ~SUMMER> OVERALL HEAT TRANSFER FACTOR 'K' (SUMMER> HEf-HING COOLING ANNLJf".)L LOADS CfiiBTU' Sl ===============~====- ANNUAL SITE ENERGY REQUIREMENTS (MBTU'S) SITE HEATING SITE.COOL:CNG SITE.LIGHTING SITE RECEPTACLE SITE FAN SITE HOT t,.JATER o. 50 BB 8[~ B1+ 97 ANNUAL SOURCE ENERGY USE ESTIMATE:: 'Cl-<BTU/SQ. FT.) -----· ---:--,----.. -------. - SOURCE HEATING' S0W1CE COOLING SpURCE LIGHTING SOURCE RECEPTr~CLE gOURCE 'FAN SOURCE HOT WATER ·237_ '3 1..2 8.7 0.4 ~). 9 12.2 L~ • 1 511 E, (). 3 LB 24. 1 5(>. 2; 16.B 23,. 1. 1.4 =· ===-= === ========= ====--== ====== .-===---=--=-=====-====-===== TPTAL ANNUA~ SOURCE ENERGY USE ESTIMATE 117.5 KBTU/SQ.FT. . . .--------------------------------.--------------------------- ( NOTE: 1 ·KWH= 10.239 KBTUS OF SOURCE ENERGY> PAGE 15 .•' -~ . ._: '-\¥. ************ SCM ******* ENERGY ANALYSIS MODEL ** DEVELOPED BY ADM ASSOCIATES, *******'**·*** *'**~·*** INC. ·)H(· **************************************************** ·FI LE N(-WiE BUILDING TYPE BUILDING TITLE AREA (SQ.FT.) ·*'*·*****-)(·***** PABP8L~ PR fMf-1RY DATA ***·***·X·**-*·** *** OP FI CE *-Ji(·* : Pf-':!U)MhR'-.(-H RPORT BUS. Pf.1RiJ~ E x-rE RIC) R WALL ••••..••••• -. II ••••••••••• _ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1 B(> WINDOW NORTH/NORTHEAST •.•...•.•..••••......•...•... 40 . . EA-ST / SOUTHEAST .•••. ~ . • • . • • • • • . • . • . • . . • . . • . . l 20 SOUTH/SOUTHWEST •••••••.•.•.••..•.......•.••. 0 ;. ~~EST /NORTHWEST: ••••••••••••••• --•••• " ••••••• ;. • 0 ROOF • ,U a a U ~a• N •• N NaN II a a N • • II a M II a• II a II II• II N NII• Ma a II II NII II a Ma A~ 730 GROLIND F't...ooR· ....... ~ .................... st' ••••••••• ,. • " " " • 7z3cs TOTAL CONDITIONED FLOCJR •.•...••...................... 730 'R'-VALUE (EXCLUDING FILM RESISTANCES) **-!C·*-l<·-lt:·***·******'k**'*·*·**·**·*·****·*·*'*·**'*'*·=** WAL.LS • " ••••••••• " •••••• 11 •••••••••••• ,. • ,. • JI ,. ft " ,. ;r ••••• " u 4 .• 8 WINDOW (INCLUDING INSIDE FILM RESISTANCE) ...........•. 9 RbQF • a • • II -• • • JIii • • • • • • • • • • • • .r; • • • • JI JI JI • • • A • • JI N JI JI Ii • • n • 1.1 a • a. If 2 2_; a ~; . . rLOOR · . · 0 ---~ J 00 .. • JI; JI; • --• :'JI • • JI JIii ·~ JI N • JI W M JI JI JI a • S, M • # JI ..Zit llt II $1 • JI N JI JI N N U JC M N U ts A W JI II; ----------~-,:~~~.~~~ . ' ~ ~ , '. t-lEATING EC!uf'F~T ·,.-y~,.. • •••••••••••••••••••• . COOLING EQUH:-.1it1ENT T n= ---. -, '".J/l Yr-L .. • • .-. • JI a 11 -• 1i1-J1 • ,. 11 JI ._...__._. • • • JI • • a • • N • • ; ECONOMrzc:::R --. I,.; JIii -~ ;Ji Ir • II JI • • lif • i ~ ·• • • -. a N • ;II, ,.--:., 11 • • If M ff • JI II a • a a JI a N 11 111 • • • .FAN POWE--R <WAt'fS/SG!. FT. )' .~ ••••.•••• ~ ••••••••••••••••• A IR GI RCULA'T i ON RATE -CCFtr:l/SQ.-l' ·Fr ... ). .. ~ .•• ~ !' ••••••••• ~ ••.•• Oi:Hl;:·R ***** HEAT :PLltrlP .. Iii DCJNbITIONER -. NO. - Ll .. A-ZIJ1UTH G~NOfHHERN-BUI-LD.JNJ;i ORIENTf:FTlGN ,".,, ~-· ~ .... ; µ""""" ••• --;---..,::~•- SHADING COE;F.FICIENT •••••••••••• -.-••.••• _. •• ,. ~ •.• ,, .-.~,..... • 65 HEAT·CAPACITY OF EXT. WALL CBTU/'F-SQ,.:fl::Y._.,½ ···,'-'>If'""'~-... :-: ... l5.6 LIGHT ING LEVEL ( WATTS/SQ. FT. ) ••••.•• ·• ~ '! -~ .• -~·...-->!f,,,. -. • • • • • • • 1. 5 FLOOR TYPE· .••••••••••••...•••••••••• ~~·••••r••••••••• SLAB CLIMATE ZONE •••••••••••••.•••••.••••.• _•··~···"'·•••••••••••• 7 PAGE 1_6 ****'******'*'* SCM ******* ** ENERGY ANALYSIS MODEL DEVELOPED BY ADM ASSOCIATES, INC. *-l•H( .. ~-M·** ·l*·X- **************************************************** PHYSICAL PARAMETERS ******************* SECONDARY f,)ATA ***********'*'** -.,--:r DOOR f-iREA ( SGl. F"T. ) • J( ••• JI ••••• II •••• h ......... " r;: "' u • s. ••• ,. # •• II ~ • II i.:=:(> DOOR 'R'-VALUE (EXCLUDING FILM RESISTANCES) ••••••••••••••••• 1.96 WALL ABSORPTIVITY .......•.. ~ ........•....•......... ~. ;; .. i ••• 7 - ROD~ ABSORPTIVIT~ .•. ; .• -.... ~ ...... ~ ...........•...... i ••• i •• CEIL I NG HEIGHT (FT. ) ••• ·• • • • • • • • • • • •. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 8 SH(-':JDING SHADING COEFFICJENT : NORTH/NDFffHEAST E:(-1ST I SOUTHEAST • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 65 : SOUTH/SOUTHWEST ..•...•................. 65 WEST /NORTHW~ST ........................ 65 DOES THIS BUILDING HAVE WINDOW OVERHANGS .....•...........••. YES DOES THIS BUI~DING HAVE WINDOW SIDE-FINS .............•...... NO MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL ************************* RATED HEATING EFFICIENCY ••• ' ••.•••••••••••••••••••••••• ~ ••• ·••• 3 -························ .......... .,1,111111111••••• '3 -~-,,. RATEb COOLING EER WATER HEATER TYPE .................................... 11 .............. . ELECTRIC ' . SPECIAL FEATURES ., ·******'********** DAYLIGHTING STRATEGIES~ .••••.•...•..••....••.. ; ...........•. NO SOLAR WATER HEATING SYSTEM ••...............•.•........ , ..•.. NO PAGE 17 ************ SCM ************ ******* ENERGY ANALYSIS MODEL ******* ** DEVELOPED BY ADM ASSOCIATES, INC. ** -K·***'*·****:****************'*·**********-)'."-lE·.:*-*-*·-K·*~·****-)'."**~: OVERHANG CHARACTERISTICS <FT.> *~**************************** NORTH/NORTHEAST EAST /SOUTHEAST SOUTH/ SOUTH~.JEST WI NDO~.J HEIGHT • • • . • • . . . • . . • • • • • • . . . • . . . . . • • 8 OVERHANG HEIGHT FROM.BASE OF WINDOW •••..• ~ 8.5 OVERH?)i~b EXTENSION FROM WINDOW . . . . . . • . . . • • 5 WI NDOi,-J HEIGHT • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • B OVERH?1NG HEIGH"!;:.-FROM BASE OF WINDOW ••••••• H. 5 OVERHANG EXTENSION FROM WINDOW •••••••••••• 5 WINDOW HEIGHT • ... • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 11 a·. • " • " • B OVERHANG 1-fE I GHT FROM BASE OF WI NDDl..J • . • • . • • 8. 5 OVERHANG EXTENSION FROM WINDOW ....•••••.•. 5 WI NDO~J HE I Gt-IT ....... A " ••••••• ,. •••• ,: • " • u " • It " £3 OVERHANG H~IGHT FROM. BAS~ OF WINDOW-~····· 8.5 O'ylE RHANG E:X TENS I ON FROM WI NDD!rJ • . . . . • • . . • • • ~; PAGE 18 ************ SCM ************ ******* ENERGY A~ALYSIS MODEL ******* ** DEVELOPED BY ADM-ASSOCIATES, INC. ** *************************************************~*~ SCHEDULING ********** i=· I XED DATA ·**·*·******"*" OCCUPANCY LEV.EL FOR OPERATIDNF-=!L PERIODS (FRACTION) : i;!.flY ••••••••••••••••• _•....... • 4-16 NI GI-t1-s •••• a .............. ·a • • • • (>38 AVERAGE LIGHTING AND RECEPThCLE LEVEL FOR OPERt~TIONAL PERIODS (FRACTION) :DAY PERIOD ••• -••••••••• 702; : N I G1 .. rr ~·E i~ I OD .. :. " ., • • • . • ., 15~1 EQUI \JALENT DPERAT I Oi\11'.:JL HOURS PER YEAR : LIGHT I NG <DAYt3) •• ·• • • • i:°::':H 5: :LIGHTING <NIGHTS) ..•. 359 : RECEPTACLE • ~ • ·• ~ •• :• • • • 3;;_:~7A : F~)NS • 111 • P • • • • ., : .. • a M '• • • a LJ-5 J. 8: : WATEf~ HEr=-ffER .. ·• • • • • • • • 1770 NUMBER OF NON-OPERATIONAL HOURS PER WEEK DA"Y' r-=1ERIO[> ........... 111 ........................ ,.a.aa,.Nfl•A•ll•"u -;--::, -.. .. 'L ... NIG{·:J .. f J=•ERIQD ••••••a•• a• a• 11 ••••••a a••• If-,•• a" Jt Ru u a•"•• 11 • • 11 NUMBER OF HOLIDAYS DURING HEATING SEASON .....•.............. 7 NUMJ3ER OF HOLIDAYS DUfHNG COOLING SEASON • . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . 3 SET-PO I NT TEMPERATURE ( F) !,JI NTER • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 70 : WINTER SETBACK •••••••••••••••••• 40 :: SlJMME R • • • • ,. • • • • • • .. ,, " . " • " • • • • • • • • -;r 8 PHYSICAL PARAMETERS ******************* SUMMER SETUP t35 I NS.I DE. FILM RES I STANCE O : WALLS •..•..•.•..•... -.•...•• '• . . . . . . . • 68 : Rd OF ••.•• • •• , ••••••••••••• " • 1111 •• 111 ••••• : FLOOR N a a N .• # a M lll .: 1111 # N IS a 1' II a a a N N :. 11 U N • a II II VENTILATION RATE (CFM/SQ.FT.) •........••.••.•.•......•..•... INFILTRATION ·RATE riURING NON-OPERATIONAL HOURS (CFMJSQ.FT.) . SLA"B FLOOR 'U' -VALUE (BTU/1--jR-SC,1. FT. --F) •••••••••••••••••••••• INTERNAL LOAtiS AND ENE~GY. **********************~** • 76 • 7f._; • 13 • 028Li- • 08.62 RECE~=-~rACLE f:1EAK LQ( .. )D, ( WA"fTS/SQ. F"T. ) ••••••••••••••• " • • • • • • • • . • 5 WATER HEATING (BTU/SQ. FT. /YEAR) •• ~ •••••••••••••••••••••••• •:• 64 PEOPLE SENSIBLE LOAD (BTU/HR/PERSON) -·~··••••••••••••••••···· 230 PEOPLE LATENT LOAD <BTU-/HR/PERSON) •.••..•..........•....... _. 1'30 AREf .. )· ·1=1ER ~·ERSDN <SQ. F·r. 1~1ERSDN> •••••••.•••••.•••...•••• ,, •.• ., 2~i(> PAGE 1'3 *********'*·*** SCM *'*·**-*·-*·-lC·***-1'-"'*·* ***·*·**** ENERGY· ANALYSLS MODEL ******** 1985, CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION*** *** COPYRIGHT CLIMATE ZONE BUIL.DING. FILE BUILDING TYPE BUILDING TITLE: 7 DATE : 08-03-1987 PABP84 *** OFFICE *** PALOMA~ AIRPORT BUS~ PARK BALANCE-POINT TEMPERATURES AND DEGREE-DAYS INPUT =========================== ============= ====== D(-W. NIGHT '-------·------- BPT1 -50. 56 ~ BPT1 = 6G. BPT2 --56. 1 E, BPTi::'. = 74. BPT3 ... 56. 16 f.{PT3 ·-74. HDD = o. (l(l HDD -· 2761. CDD = 19C~:3. 90 CDD = ENVELOPE HEAT TRANSFER FACTORS (BTU/HR-~> ====================== ~ ====::::::::::::::::::::::::::-.:::::::=::::. :::::::::::::::::::::::= OVERALL BUILDING ENVELOPE HEAT TRANSFER RATE (WINTER) OVERALL -HE(-H TRf.":JNSFER FACTOR 'l-<' (WINTER) OVERALL BUILDING'ENVELOP~ HEAT TRANSFER RATE (SUMMER) OVERALL HEAT TRANSFER FACTOR 'K' (SUMMER) HEf'..HING COOLING ANNUAL LOADS (MBTU'S> ------------------------------------------. -- ANNUAL SITE ENERGY REQUIREMENTS (MBTU'S) ===================-===-=-=L---~=----=~= SITE HEf'..HING SITE COOLING SITE LIGHTING SITE RECEPTACLE SITE Ff-)N SITE HOT WATER 1. L1-3 73 7~3 l -1 • I 06 ·ANNUAL SOURCE ENERGY USE ESTIMATE <KBTU/SQ.FT.) :.:::::: ''::::::::::::::::::=====:==. -. =:.-==========================:========= SOURCE HEA"f'°ING SOW"<CE COOLING SOURCE LIGHTING SOURCE RECEPTf~CLE SOUF<CE FAN SOURCE HOT wn:rER 201. 5 ~3c)·3. ·7 1.l (). L:- 5. 8 :l.i.~:. 2 L}. i ~·-b l.6 j~~~-8 5(>. 3 16.8 2~~-1 1.4 ======== =-·======================================================= TbTAL ANNUAL SOURCE ENERGY USE ~STIMAtE 117.0 KBTU/SQ.FT. =. ----·===-======-=======·=============-= ·==================-~===== ( NOT~: 1 KWH= 10.239 KBTUS OF SOURCE ENERGY) PAGE 20 ************ SCM ************ ******* ENERSY ANALYSIS MODEL ******* ** DEVEL.OPED BY. ADM ASSOCIATES, INC. ** **************************************************** FILE N(~ME BUILDING TYP!::: BUILDING TITLE AREA (SQ.FT.) · **,l(·*-*·*"*"**·lHE·** t:•ABP85 PRIM(-1RY DAT(~ . *-!(·****'*'**'*·*'*· : *** OFFICE *** PALOMR~AIRPORT BUS. PARK EX .. fERI[fR ~iJ~)LL ••••·•,.••••••••••••n••••••N ............ .,.w••'-•., 180 WINDOW: NORTH/NORTH~AST ·•~····················~····· 40 : EAST /SOUTHEAST SOUTH/SOUTHl..JEST t,.JEST /NORTHl..JEST 120 Iii N N N a • Ill N M N M N N M N N N Ill M N N N II a • II a II • ,lr(> ............................. -....... "" c:, ROOF If ...... II •••••• •• -· •• " .............. u •••••• 111 ....... " it H •• • 8:-3<:> ~ROLIND F-.. LOOf~ • ,. • •• · •••••••••••• _ ••• IN ••••••••••••••• : •• ,:. "' .. 8?;(> TOTAL CONDITIONED FLOOR •••••• · •••••••••••••••••••••••• 830 'R'-VALUE <EXCLUDING FILM RESISTANCES} ************************************** lr,J(.{LLS ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• A ,, ••• 11 ••••• ., •••••• II 4 .• 8 ·w I NDOW ( I NCLUIH NG I NS I DE FILM REE I STANDE) . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~-3 ROOF ••• ,. •• -•••••••..••• ,. •••••• 11 ,. .... -•••• " .,. ••••••••• u • • • 22;. ~t F' I_ 0 0 f~ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • .. • • • • • • ,. • • • ll • ,. " • u • • • • . • " • " •. • · • ~ ::: • <:) HVAC SYSTEM *'*"*"******** HE?H I NG EQUIPMENT ~TYPE . . . • . . . . . . . . . • • • . . . • . . . . • • . . . . . HE(-iT PUMP COOLING EQL_JIPMENT TYPE' •. • ••••••••••••• ·• ••••••••• ; •••. ~. AIR CONDITIONER ECC)NOMIZER .......... · ..... 111 .................. -................ ~ ••••• NO ' FAN POWER <WATTS/SQ.FT.) ...•.•.•...•.•..••.....•...... 5 AIR CIRCULATION RATE (CFM/SC.1.FT.) •••••.••.••••••••••••• l OTHER **'*** AZIMUTH OF NORTHERN BUILDING ORIENTATION ..•.•.•...... 0 SHADING COEFFICIE~T •••~•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• .65 HEAT CAPACITY OF EXT. WALL CBTU/F-SQ.FT.) •••••••••••. 15.6 LIGHTING LEVEL n.JATTS/SC.1. FT.) · .•.••................•.. L 5 FLOOR IYl=1E .......................... ·• • • • . • • . . • • • • • • • . . . SLAB CL.IMA1""E ZONE ................................... ,. • • •... . • 7 PAGE 21 ************ SCM ******* ENERGY ANALYSIS MODEL ** DEVELOPED BY ADM ASSOCIATES, **-l<:··*·**''**·**** ******* INC. **************************************************** . - PHYS I Cf~L PARAMETERS ******************* SECDNDARY DATi-~ -K·-K·******-Jr:·t-~-JE--l(·-X· ·DOOF< i::.)RE1'.:i ( BG!. FT. ) ••••.••••• ·• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 20 DOOR 'R'-VALUE (EXCLUDING FILM RESISTANCES> .......•......... 1.96 :WAL~ ABSORPTIVITY .... ~ •.•...•. ; ..... : ••....•.... ; ...•..•...... 7 · R(JOF.... ~~13s0 Rt:=•T· Iv :c ·rv •••• : •••••••••••• w ....... " •• u ....... " • u ·• ~ • .. • • .. 5 CEIL I NG. HEIGHT CFT. ) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • 8 SHAQING *~'i-****'* SHADING COEFFICIENT NORTH/NORTHEAST EAST /SOUTHEF=!ST : SOU°l"H/$DUTHI-JEST : WEST /NQRTHW~ST 6 •=-• ·..J • 65 . 65 DOES THIS BUILDING HAVE WINDOW OVERHANGS .............•...... YES DOES THIS BUILDING HAVE WINDOW SIDE-FINS ...•................ NO MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL *********~*************** RATED HEATING EFFICIENCY ••••.••.•.........•...............•. 3 RAi .. EI) COOL .. I NG EEf< • . • • .... • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • . . • • • .. • . • • . . . . • . . . • • . '3 WATER HEATEf~ TYPE . • • . • • • • • . . . . . . . . . • • • • . . • . . . . . . . . . . • • . . . •. . . ELECTRIC SPECIAL-FEATURES **************** DAYLIGHTING STRATEGIES •••••.•...•••••••••..•....•....•.•...• NO . ' SOLAR WATE~ HEATING SYSTEM •.•....•..............•........... NO PAGE 22 ************ SCM ****"*'*'*· ENERGY ANALYSIS MODEL ** DEVELOPED BY ADM ASSOCIATES, ·*"****·l(·*·***-l<·* **'*·**·)(:-*· INC. **************************************************** ·OVERHANG CHARACT~RISTICS 1FT. > *******************~********** NORTH/NQHTHEf~ST: : ~·H NDOW HEIGHT • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 8. OVERHANG HEIGHT FROM BASE OF WINBow-••••••• 8.5 OVE~~I-IA~ EXl-ENSION FROM WIJ\IDOW •••• II Nu II •• M • ~I EAST / SOUTHEAST :· t,.JI NDOW HEIGHT • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 8 OYEHl-if~N~ HE I GHt;, FROM Bf-4SE OF WINDOW • • • • • • • 8. 5 OVERHANG EXTENSION FROM WINDOW~ ••• ; ••••••• 5 SOUTH/SOUTHWEST: WINDOW HEIGHT.~ ........................... 8 OVERH~)NG HEIGHT FROM BAGE OF t,.HNDOW • • • • • • • 8. 5 OVEHHANG E·XTENSION FROM WINDOW .-....•...... ·5 t,.JEST / NORTHWEST : WI NDO!,,J HE:: I GHT ••••••••••••••••••••• : • • • • • • • 8 OVERHANG HEIGHT ~ROM BASE OF WINDOW ....... 8.5 OVERH(-)NG EXTENSION FROM t,.JINDOW .; •••• : ••••••.•. 5 PAGE 23 ************ SCM *********'*·** ENERGY ANALYSIS MODEL ******* ** DEVELOPED BY ADM ASSOCIATES, INC. ** **************************************************** . · SCHEDULING FIXED mnA ·*****~*·***-l<· OCCUPANCY LEVEL FOR OPERATIONAL PERIODS (FRACTION) : DflY .......... ,. ..... " ......... . : ~ I G1~11S •• " ........... ~ •• " ...... . f.WEF<hGE LIGHTING AND RECEPTACLE l...:EVEL FOR OPERATIONAL PERIODS, (FRACTION) :Df'..)Y PERIOD • ,f16 • 038 • 703 : NIGHT PER I DD ••••••• ~ • • 156 EQUIVALENT:OPERATIONAL H08RS PER YEAR ;LIGHTING <DAYS) .....• 2915 :LIGHTING (NIGHTS) .... 359 :RECEPTACLE-~·-··~···· 3274 :: FAr~s ... " .... ,. If •• " • ,; " • • • 4-5 l 8 : L.JATER HE(-ri"Ef~ • • • • • • • • . 1 T/O NUMBER OF NON-OPERATIONAL HOURS PER WEEK Df:.) \( t=1E RI OD • • • • • • • • • • 11 • • • A N N • 111 • u " x • • • • 111 • • N a a • ,. 11 • a A ,1 u • u • • · :~2 NIC:if;...{T ~:11:::RICtD •••• " •••••••• " ................... ". -A • .a •• "" • • 1.rE, NUMBER OF HOLIDAYS DURING HEATING SEASON •..............•.... 7 NUMBER OF HOLIDAYS DURING COOLING SEASON •••••••••••••••••••• 3 SET---POINT TEMPERATURE (F) ~HNTEH . . • . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . 70 WINTER SETBACK ••••••••••.••••••• 40 SUMMER . . . . • . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . 7 8 : SLJM}Yl[~ t~ S,E:1-Ui=1 u ,; • II 11 ~ N " II ,, II II •• u :, ~ • u = 85 PHYSICAL PARAMETERS ******************* INSIDE FILM RESISTANCE: WALLS 11 II II II II II II II U II II II II II II II II U ~ II II II II II U II II II 11 ~ : ROOF ••• II ••• II II • II • II •••• II •• .i " II II II .. u u ., .. II :, . F"LOOR II II ....... II • II II • II • II •• II II ... II ••• II u •• i. VENTIU~TION RATE <CFM/SG!~ FT.) ••• , •••••••••••••••••••••••••••• • 68 . 76 • 7E, II 13 INFILTRATION RATE DURING NON-OPERATIONAL HOURS <CFM/SQ.FT.) .. 0284- SLAB FLOO.R ' U' -VALUE <BTU/HR-SQ. FY. -F) •.•.......... ·. . . . . . . . . . 0862 INTERNAL LOADS AND ENERG~ ************************* RECEJ:•TACLE 1=1EAK LOAD < t,.Jf~TTS/SQ. F-r .. > II ., • II II II •• II •• II •• II II II •• II II • • • • • 5 WA"fE_R HEATING CBTU/SQ. FT. /YE?)R) ••••••••••••••••••••.••••••• ~. 64 PEOPLE SENSIBLE LOAD (BTU/HR/PERSON) · •.•....•...... ." .•..• -.•.. c'.30 PEOP~E LATENT LOAD (BTU/HR/PERSON) •. · •.••...•.••.•..........• 190 AREA PER PERSON (SQ. FT. /P~RSON) ••.•••••••..•••..•••.•..••.... 250 PAGE 2-'~ *******~"***** ******** *** COPYRIGHT CLIMATE ZONE BUILDING FILE BUILDING TYPE BUILDING TITLE; SCM ENERGY ANALYSIS MODE~ ******** 1985, CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION*** 7 DATE: 08-03~1987 :· PABP85 *** OFFICE *** PALOMAR AIRPORT BUS. PARK BALANCE~POINT YE~PERATURES AND DEGREE-DAYS INPUT -==--~==-==--· =--=---=---===~ ~=============== DAY: NIGHT --------------"-· BPTl ·-4"3. 57 BPT1 -66. BPT2 -· 58. 1+7 BPT2 -· 74-. BPT3 ::::: 56.4:7 BPT3 ·-· 74. HDD -· o.oo HDD = c:7·~39,. CDD ::::: 1844.24 CDD -' .c • ENVELOPE HEAT TRANSFER tACTORS CBTU/HR-F): --~----=----------------~---------------= OVERALL BUILDING ENVELOPE HEAT TRANSFER RATE (l,JINTER) OVE-RALL HE1'..:rr TR1~NSFE~ F(-=!CTDf< ' I-<' ('\,,JI NTEf-<) OVERALL BUILDING ENVELOPE HEAT TRANSFER RATE (SUMMER) OVER(-11....L HEAT TR!'..1NSFER FhCTOR 'i-1-' (SUMMER) HEf:.HING COOL.ING ANNUAL LOADS (MBTU'S) ------------------------------------------ ANNUAL SITE ENERGN REC!lJJ.REMENTS (MBTU 1 S) --=---==~-~============================= SITE HEATING SITE COOLING SITE LIGHTING SITE RECEPTACLE SITE. FAN SITE HOT W1~TER 36 7'3 79 07 03 ANNUAL SOURC~ ENERGY USE ESTIMATE <KBTU/SQ.fT.) -============================================== SOURCE HEATING SOURCE COOLING SOURCE LIGHTING SOURCE -~ECEPT~CLE SOURCE FAN SOURCE HOT WATER ' . 23'3. () i:::42.c (} · "3. 3 12 .• ':3 4.5 1.7 22.3 5(>. 3 16.8 23. 1 i.L;. ----------------------------------.------------------------------- TOTAL ANNUAL SOURCE ENERGY USE ESTIMATE 115.5 KBTU/SQ.FT. -------------------·-----------.------------------------------ NOTE: 1 Kt,JH -= iO. 23-9 1-<BTUS OF SOURCE ENERGY ) PAGE 25 ************ SCM ************ ******* ENERGY ANALYSIS MODEL *"*·***"H'-· ** DEVELOPED BY ADM ASSOCIATES, INC. ** **************************************************** Fil0.E NAME BUILDING TYPE BUILDING TITLE i'.=lREf'.'.! ( SQ. FT. ) *·*·***·*·*·****** EXTERIOR Wf-)LL : Pt-1BP86 PRIMr=:tRY D<-H<-1 **-l'-·***"*"**·*-li.·* : *** OFFICE *** : P1'..1LO!YJ(-) ff. 1'.:t I RPOFH BUS. PA RI-<· a a • • a • • • a a • a • • • • a • • • • • • • a N • • • a • • • • • • • a A • WINDOW : NOR-TH/NORTHEAST : EAST /SOUTHEAST ....... ~ ..................... . 180 .l~(l 120 : SOUTH'/ SOUTHWEST .....•............••........•. , . 0 : ·i,JEST / NO fHHWEST .: ••••••••••••••••••••• ~ • • • • • • 0 RQOi==-•••••••••••••• -~ ••••• " • N •· •••••• N -•••••••• ., ••• A • ., • • t:!-... :i.() GROUND FLOOR •••••• ~ ••••••••••••• ·~···••••••••••• ••••• 830 To·r1'--il .. coi\JI)r·rI01,JED F-.. L.OOR ....... "!I ••••.••••••••••••••• ".·. a;,1() 'R'-VALUE <EXCLUDING FILM RESISTANCES> ************************************** li\fALLS ., ••• ,, •••••• -..• " ••••••••••••••...•• ., .••. " . " .. " . . 4.,, 8 WINDOW (INCLUDING IN~IDE FILM RESISTANCE) ............. 9 ROCJF-..••••••••••••••••••• 11 •••••••••• -•• "' ,, ., •• ,, • ,, • .u ••• " " • c~6. =:._r i::1.. .. 00 R ....... = •••• ., ,. •••••••••• , ••••••••••• ., • ., •• A •••• ;t • ,, " u (:) HW-)C SYSTEM ****-li"****** HEATING EQUIPMENT TYPE COOLING EQUIPMENT TYPE ....... ., ........................ . ................................. " ... ECQNOMIZE;:"R~ •••••••••••••• -~ ••••• " •••••••••••••••••• 1:1;. L. HEf'..)T PUMP f=IIR. CONDITIONER NO 1:::AN t=•owgR (WfrrTS/SQ. r=·r. ) .......... ~. • • . • . . • • . . . . . . . . . . . 5 AIF~ CIRCULATION RATE <CFM/SQ.FT.) ••....•.•...•...... _. 1 :OTHER :*****· t AZIMUTH OF NORTHERN BUILDING OAIENTATION .••.......••. 0 SHADING COEFFICIENT ....•.•.•.............•............ 65 HEAT CAPACITY OF EXT. WALL (BTU/F-SQ.FJ.) ....••...•• ~ 15.6 LIGHT!NG LEVEL <WATTS/SQ.FT.> .•...• : ..•••••...•.. -..•• 1.5 FLOO"R · TYl=1E •· ••••••••••••• ,, ..................... &: ...... ,,, •• CLIMt.::iTE ZONE ............... " .... " .................................... .,., PAGE 26 SLAB 7 ******* ** SCM ENERGY ANALYSIS MODEL DEVELOPED BY (.'.:iDM ASSOCI(.'.:iTES, INC. *-J;,:·-*·*·**·"*· ·*'·l(- **************************************************** PHYSICAL PARAMETERS ******************* SECOND(.'.:iRY DATA ***'*'***** .. **·'*·~: DOOR AREA ( SQ. F .. f. ) ...... ,. ....... ,• .......... " .. ,. ,. ..... ,. 11 •• u • " • ,, 2() DOJ]R 'R' ..... VAI_LJE <EXCL..UDING FIL.trf-Rt~·SISl"t~Nt:ES) .... ".,. II M •• •.• •• -• 1. 13E, ti-JAL.L ABf3CJ F~1=11 .. Iv I 1·v ..... ~ •••• " • : •.• " • ,, .............. u ••• " •• · • " •• : • " • -1 ROC1f=" (.."~BSOF<f=··r IV I l .. Y • II •• M • ~II ••• ~ u •• If ••• • ... JI ••••••• " • u II a •• p •.• II • • • • • • 5 c:E IL I NG f-lE I (3:J-11· ( F·-r. ) -· .•••••.• • .•• ,. ,, ·-••.•.• " ...... " .... 1,1 ,. " • .. .. • • 8 SHADING *-lr."-):-**·~"* SHADING COEFFICIENT NORTH/ NO RTHE{-)ST EAST /SOUTHEAST SOUTH/ SOUTHi.JEST .65 ~·,!EST /NORTHWEGT • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •. • • • 55 DOES THIS BUILDING HAVE WINDOW OVERHANGS ....•....•.....•.... YES DOES THIS BUILDING HAVE WINDOW SIDE-FINS .............. · ...•.. NO MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL ****~******************** RATED HEATING EFFICIENCY ..•.. ~ ....•.................. ~··•·•· 3 RAl .. ED C()lJJ_ING EER ...................................... JII.... . '::J WATER HEATER TYPE SPECIAL FEATURES . . '. *******~f******* ••~• .. •••• .. •• .. ••• .. ••• .. ••»•aa .......... "·••-••••• ELECTRIC DAYLIGHTING STRA1EGIES .-...• ~ ...•..•..•.............•.•...••. NO SOLAR WATER HEATING SYSTEM •••.•..••...•..•............•.•... NO PAGE:: 27 ~*********** SCM ************ ******* ENERGY ANALYSIS MODEL ******* ** DEVELO~~D BY ADM ASSOCIATES, INC. ** ******~****************************~**************** OVERHANG CHARACTERISTrcs· (FT.) ****************************** NORTH/NOHTHEAST E~)ST / SOUTHEAST SOUTH/SOUTHWEST WEST /NORTHWEST WINDOW HEIGHT • • • • • • • • • .• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 8 OVERHANG HEIGHT FROM BASE OF WINDOt,..I ••• ~. • • 6. 5 OVERl-lAl'Tf.i f::O:Xl~ENSION f""F<Orlf Wif\JfjOW •• ,. ........... 5 L~ I NDO~,J HEIGHT • . . . • . . . • . • • • . . . . . . • . . . . • • . • • B OVERHANG HEIGH .. !;-:.-FROM BASE OF l.JINDOW • • • • • • • 8. 5 OVERHANG EXTENSION FROM WINDOW ..•.......•• 5 WINDOW HEIGHT • • ••••••••••••••••••• ~ • • • • • • • • 8 OVERHANG HEIGHT FRDtiJ BASE rn=-ltHNDOltJ •· ••••• ~ a. 5 OVERHANG.EXTENSION FROM WINDOW •••••••••••• 5 WINDOW HEIGHT •••••••••••••••••••• " • • • • • • • • 8 OVERHANG HEIGHT FROM B0SE OF WINDO~ .....•. 8.5 QVERHAN~ EXTENSION FROM WINDOW ..•.....•... 5 PAGE 28 .,. ,. ************ SCM ************ ******* ENERGY ANALYSI$ MODEL *·!<:****·* ** DEVELOPED BY ADM ASSOCIATES, INC. ** ************·lE-·X-**~-****·lE-~··Ji!-*·******·**·lE-·******'*·X··)(-*·f:X-*·*°*.i:;-·** FIXED .DATA . ·****·lE-*·X·*-l{·-1{- SCHEDULING ·l<:--1(·-lt·-*·***·X·** OCCUPANCY LEVEL-FOR OPERATIONAL . PERIODS <FRACTION) lJ.fl'Y ••••• ,,, ........ !fNNMNQ.NNNl,fNN : l\lIGi-f"fS •••.••••••• -• ~. w •• ,, ••• (-iVERr.:iGE LIGHTING AND RECEPTACLE l~-EVEL FOR QPERf.)TI0Nt4L PERIODS (FRACTION) :DAY PERIOD ....•..•.•. • "+ 16 "'(>38 • 703 :i\JIGl·iT I=1E}~~OI) ...•...•.•. 156 EGlUIVALENT DPERATIONf4L HOURS PER YEPJR :LIGHTING <DAYS) •••••• :;=:915 :LIGHTING (NIGHTS) .•.. 359 :REC~PTACLE· .. ~ ..... ~.~ 3274 :: Ff-1h1S ..... ~ ••• ~ •••• ll • " a • 1+51 B : Wi'.=lTE.R HE1-/fEf~ . • • • • • • • • .• 1 T10 NUMBER OF NON-OPERATIONAL HOU~S PER WEEK DA·v l=1E f~ I OD ••••••••• " .................. ,. ••• M a .... lJ " •••••• "' • • 3i.=.?. p~ I GHT f:rER I OD •.•••••. -• ..•• " ............. u ....... • ••••• u " ... ., .. • -46 NUMBER OF HOLIDAYS DURING HEATING SEASON •................... 7 NUMBER OF HOLIDAYS DURING COOLING SEASON •••••••••••••••••••• 3 SET-POINT TEMPERATURE (F) : ~n:NTEF< . . . . • . • . • • • . . . . . . • . . • . . . . . 70 PHYSICAL PARAMETERS ******************* INSIDE FILM RESISTANCE WINTER SETBACK ....•....•.•...... 40 :: SlJIYfft1ER 11, • ,. " f:; ••• •• ct II ti' •• '! II II :' • " " A " u ti p -1 B : SlJit1Mt=:R £::r:.:l .. L.tf:i •• ,._ ............ u •• ., ti .. =B~:i : t,g.)LLS. • SB :-ROOF ••• ,. .• 11 11 ............... " ••••• " • • • • " 7 E., : F·LoOR ••••• = •••••••••••• ~ • ., ••••••••• -.. ,, .. i6 VENTILATION ~~AJ"E (CFM/SQ. FT. ) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • :l3 INFILTRATION R~TE'DURfNG NON-OPERATIDNAL·HOURS (CFM/SQ.FT. > •• 0284 . . SLAB FLOOR 'LJ' -vr~LUE <.BTU/HR-SC,1. FT. -F) .......... ~ •.•.•••• •,. ·• • 0862 INTERNAL. LOADS ANj) ENERBY, l *·****·**********-i•HE··Ji!-·lE-***·*** RECEf:11"ACLE ~1EAK LOAD (WAT"fS/SQ. F .. f. ) .........•...........•..... 5 WATER HEATING (BTU/SQ.FT./YEAR) ....•....•...••..•••..• ~ ..••. ·54 PEOPLE SENSIBLE LOAD <BtU/HR/PERSON) •••••.•••••..•..•• ~ •.•.. 230 PEOPLE LATENT LOAD (BTU/HR/PERSON> •.•••••••••••••••••••••••. ·190 AREA PER PERSON ( SQ. FT. /PERSON) ••••••••••••••••••••••••• _-. • • 250 PAGE-29 SCM ************* **·***·lE-·lE-* ENERGY ANALYSIS MODEL ******** 1985, CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION*** ·*** COPYRIGHT CL..IMATE ZONE BUILDING FILE BUILDING TYPE=; BUILDING TITLE .: 7 DATE : 08-03-1987 : .PABP86 *** OFFICE *** PALOMAR AIRPORT BUS. PARK Bi~LANCE-POINT TEMPERATURES AND DEGREE-Df-WG INPUT =========== ==== ===================---==--=~--= DAY NIGHT ______________ .. ________ BPT1 50. 1".1--;:::;=., --BPTl --E,6. BPT2 -C'c;' 86 "'Jw. BPT2 = 7A-. BPT3 ·-55. 86 BPT3 == 74. HDD = Cl. 00 HDD = 27i5. .CDD -1 '3~-38. 46 CDD ::::: ENVELOPE HEAT TR8NBFER FACTORS (BTU/HR-F) =============== ========================= OVERALL BUILDING ENV~LQPE HEAT TRANSF~R RATE CWIN1ER> : OVERf-1LL -HE(~T TRANSFER F·:f-)CTOR ' I-{' ( v-JINTEf~; ·ovERALL eurLDI~G ENVELciPE HEAT TRANSFER RATE (SUMMER) OVERAU_·HEAT TRANSFER FACTOR 'K' (GUMMER> HEf'..HING COOLING ANNUAL LOADS <MBTU'S} =======·============= ANNUAL SITE ENERGY REQUIREMENTS CMBTU'S> -.. -=·---=· --.. -==-----=::.-=----.. :::::::::!.-• ..::=-------==--·--··-.:.----.. :: .. :::: . .::: ..... .=::: SI TE HEA"(I NG SITE COOLING SITE LIGHTING SIT!?. RECE;PTACLE SITE FAN SITE HOT t.JATER 1. E.:9 63 63 3£.i 12 ANNUAL SOURC~ ENERGY USE ESTIMATE (KBTU/SQ.FT.) =============·======='====-==================== SOURCE HEATING SOURCE. COOLING SOl)RCE LIGHTING SOURCE RECEPTACLE SOURCE FAN SOURCE HOT \,-JAi"ER . ' . i.=.::(>8 .. :f. ;3 i:_:~ 1 ,. Lt- 1" E: 13. 2 0.4 E,. 1 1,3. 9 L.,. .~ ' . '-' 6.4 (l. L~ 1.5 j:.:2. () 5(). ~ 1G.8 -::,-,;-......... 1. 1. L~ -------------------------------------------=----=---=======~===== TOTAL ANNUAL SOURCE ENERGY USE ESTIMATE 1l5. 1 KBTU/SQ.FT. ·====================== ============·======== ====='=============== . . NOTE: f KWH == io. 2,39 KBTUS OF SOURCE ENERGY ) PAGE 30. ·lE-***·X·******* -K· -K· *-K· * "*· •)i- SCM ENERGY ANALYSIS MODEL ·l!-·l!-%·***·*-K··l!--l<··*·l<· *****-l(·-J<· ** DEVELOPED BY ADM ASSOCIATES, INC. ** ************************************************~*** FILE NAME BUILDING TYPE BUlLDING TITLE A'REA ( SQ. FT. ) ***-K··il-·***-lr'.·**·lE-·M- : :P(4Br:•87 PRIMARY DATA ·X-~:--lE·*****°*·**-!-.~ : ***; OFFICE *** : PALOMA~'AIRPORT BUS. PARK EXTERIOR WALL ••••.•••••••••••••••••••.••••. "........ • 2i.~() WINDOW NORTI~/NORTHEAST ••••• ; •..•••.•••.••.•.••.•. ;. 0 .. ROOF : EAST /SOUTHEAST SOUTH/ SOUTH!.-JEST : WEST /NORT~WEST . . • Ill • a N Ill IIS a a II, N • ,r II N a •. • N • JI • • Al II a a Ill N a M a N •• • N >I A &J 1' U N It 1,1 II •• • II HO L~(i 0. 850 GROUND FLOOR ••••••••••••••r••···~·· •••••••••••••..•.• b60 TOTAL CONDITIONED FLOOR ..•••••.•••••...•....•.••••••. gso 'R'-VALUE (EXCLUDING FILM RESISTANCES) ************************************** (,\fJ'.=.)LLS ,i • • • a • a • • 111 • • • a 11 • 11 • 111 • JI « a a • ,: 11 • a • • N • • • • a • 1t a M u a u u • • • 4· a E~ i..J I NDOW ( INCLUDING I NB I DE FILM !~ES I ST1'.:JNC1::) • • • • • • • • • • • • • ·~J F{O[iF" • • " • • Iii u • a ~ • • ~ • • • a a • • " • • • • • v • .-• • u ., • 11 • 11 1r • .. • • rt a u SI • • ~ i.":::_3 • ~j F:·t_oo fi • II _JI II •• IC •••••••••• '!: ..... -• R •• II • '! •• " :r " -1,,1 II II • a • a '! • lilll • u .• ~ t:) H\JAC SYSTEM "''*******·*·** HEATING EQUIPMENT TYPE COOLING EQUIPMENT TYPE .................. ,; ................ . ................................................. ECON OM I z ER •• N ••••••• ~ ••••••••••••••••••• : •••••••••••• ,_ • HEf=H PUMP {J. IR CONDIT I ONE/~ NO FAN POWE.R (Wf.::rTTS/S,Q. FT.) ...••. · ......•.••.....•..• • •..• 5 AIR CIRCULATION RATE ·<CFM/SQ.FT.) OTHER ***** . 9 AZIMUTH OF NORTHERN BUILDING ORIENTATION .•••...••••.• 0 SHADING COEFFICIENT • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 65 HEAT CAPACITY OF EXT. WALL (BTU/F~SQ.~T.) ..•••...••.• 15.6 L1GHT-ING LEVEL (J,,.Jf.=ITTS/SQ. FT.) • • •••••. ~............... 1. 5 FLOOR TYJ:1E ................................ , ........... .. CLIMATE ZONE. PAGE 31 su:rn 7 ************ SCM ************ ******* ENERGY ANALYSIS MODEL ******* ** DEVELOPED BY ADM ASSOCIATES, 1NC. ** **************************************************** PHYSICAL PARAMETERS ******************* SECONDARY DhT(~ **"*''*'*****t'*'*·*-l(· -. DOOR Af~EA ·(SG!. FT. ) ••. II~ ••••••••• II ••••• II. II. JI N ••••••• N • u •• ,: r::." i:::t) DOOR 'R'-VALUE (EXCLUDIN~ FILM RESISTAN~ES) ·······:·•••••••• 1.96 t,.JALL (4B80 Ri=1l .. IV I ~y •••.. !' :• • " • w •••••••• ,. • JI • -••• " ........ 1111 • u •• ~-•• JI • ..7 . ' -ROOF f~Bi3(JRJ:a7-I\./ I l"\{ •••.•.• " .. ., ••.•..• ti ...................... ., .... . .. 5 CEIL I NG HE I Gl-lT < F""'f. ) ••.•••• " ,. .............. " .•. :r •••• " ... " " ••• ,,_ 8 SHADING -l<:-·);-~:**-lr."·* SHADING COEFFICIENT : NORTH/NORTHEAST : EAST /SOUTHEAST SOUTH/ SOUTH~,JEST --c· ll Q._1 • t:i::., "E,5 WEST /NORTHWEST .................•. ~··· .b~ DOES THIS tUILD~NG HAVE WINDOW OVERHANGS .................... YES DOES THIS BUILDING HAVE WINDOW SIDE-FINS .................... NO MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL ************************* RATED HEATING EFFICIENCY •••.•.......••••.•••............ ~··· ~ RA l""ED COOL I NG EE R " ••••••••.••••••• ., ... ,, •.•••••.... ., • .. .. . . . . • .. . '3 WATER HEAT~R TYPE .•..•...•••••••.........•.••....•...•..•... ELECTRIC SPECIAL.FEATURES ***************~ DAYLIGHTfNG STRATEGIES ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••r••••••••• NO SOLAR WATER HEATING SY~TEM ...... _ .....•...................... NO PAGE 32 ******* ** . SCM ENERGY ANALYSIS MODEL ******* DEVELOPED BY.ADM ASSOCIATES, INC. ** OVERHANG CHARACTERISfrcs:(FT.) ******************~*i********* NORTH/NORTHEAS'T: : t~INDOW HEIGHT • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 8 bVERHANG HEIGHT FROM BASE OF WINDOW ....... 8.5 OVERHANG EXTENSION FROM WINDOt,J ••.•. •. • • • • • • • ~ EAST / SOUTHEi'.=JST ·: WINDOW HEIGHT •••••••• ~ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 8 OVERHANG HEIGH1,:r FROM Bf-1SE OF WI°NDOt,J • • • • • • • B. 5 OVEF<t .. JANG ~X .. fENSION F'ROIYJ lr-JINDC}~J .• " •• · •••••••• ~5 SOUTH/SDUTHt•JEST : WINDOW HEIGHT • ••••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 8 OVERHANG HEIGHl FROM BASE OF WINDOW .....•. 8.5 OVERH(-1NG EXTENSibN FROM WINDOl...J :• ••••••••••• · ~:i WEST /NORTHWEST : \..JINDOW HEIGHT ••••••• , ••••••••••••••••••••• -5 OVERHANG H~IGHT FROM BASE OF WINDOW ....... 8.5 OVER8ANG EXTENSION FROtri WINDm\i · ••• .,· •••••• ~ .-5 PAGE 33 ************ SCM ******* ENERGY ANALYSIS MODEL ** DEV~LOPED BY ADM ASSOCIATES, ****'*·*·::ii-*·**'*'*' ·***·***"!<· INC. **************************************************** ·SCHEDLJL I NG ********** _FIXED DATA *-,::··l-i-***-iHH*··X: OCCUPANCY LEVEL FOR QPERATIONAL PERIODS (FRACTION) I).flY •••••• • •••••••••.••••••••• ,.1-1.6 : NI G1--11-s .................... ll • • • C>38 AVER1'.=!GE LIGHTING (~ND RECEPTACLE Li.~VEL FOR OPERATIONAL PERIODS u~RACTION) :DAY PERIOD ...........• 703 :NIGHT PERIOD .......... 156 EQUIV(-)LENT OP!:::RATIONAL HOURS PER. YEAH :LIGHTING <Df~'{S) .•.... 2':J15 :LIGHTING (NIGHT$) ..•. 359 ~ .Rt~c·E]:·1-1:--1c1_1: .. : II •• "!"' " " u • II • 3i=.:·1.t:. : FANS •• !' • " • u ...... " ,. ,, ~ • A-518 :WATER HEATER ......... l~IU NUMBER OF NON-OPERATIONAL HOURS PER WEEK I_)E=}'{ l=1ERIDD ........ 11'•······-·······-·""··· ............. h.M'-D"U 3:.=:?. {\f I'Gf .. iT ,f=lf~ RI OQ • • •' • " • • • • • • • •, • • .• • •· • • • ·• • • M! u, • •, •· • a •· o1 • • • u 11 ti u ti a • .lJ-6 NUMBER OF HOLIDAYS DURING HEATING SEASON~ ••••••••••••••••••• 7 NUMBER OF HOL I D1'.:lYS DUf·Hi\lG COOL. I NG SEASON • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ..:i SET-POINT TEMPERATURE (F) WINTER •..•.•.•.•.•..........•.. " 70 PHYSICAL PARAMETERS ******************* 'INSIDE FILM RESISTANCE WINTER SETBACK ......•........... 40 Sl.JJYJJvfER " • " " • • • • • t1 a • • • 11 • • ii: • t1 a If t. • • • Rf B SUMMER SETUP •••••••••••••••••••• 85 WALLS : ROOF • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 76 : , FLUOR . • . • . • . • . . • • • . . • • . . . . . . • • . . . • . . 76 . VENTILATION RATE (CFM/SQ. FT·.) .. • •.. · ..•..... ~ ....•............ 13 INFILTRATION RATE DURING NQN~OPERATIONAL HOURS <CFM/SQ.FT.) .. 0284 SJ...AB FLOOR '-U' -VALUE (BTU/HR-SQ. FT. -:F) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0862 : INTERNAL LOADS. AND ENEREiY, . *~**·***·*--K·*-ll;·****·*-*·lE-****-lHE·* RECEPTACLE PEAK LOAD (WATTS/SQ.FT.) .•...•.....••..... ~ ...••. ~5 WATf::R HEATING. (BTU/SQ. FT. /YEAR) ••••••••••••••••••••••• · •••••• 6L~ f:1EOf.:1LE · SENS I-BLE LOAD (BTU/ 1-J R/ f:1E RSON) . · •• · . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • 2-:~() PEOPLE .LATENT LOAD (BTU/HR/PERSON) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 190 AREA PER PERSON (SQ.FT./PERSON) ...........•..•...•.......... 250 PAGE 34 , I . I i { ' J -!<·******'*'***** SCM· ******** ENERGY ANALYSIS MODEL ******** *-Jr:·* COPYRIGHT 1 985, CAL I FD RN I A ENERGY COl't'iM ISSI ON *-K·* CLIMATE ZONE : 7 DATE : 08-03-1987 BUlLDING FILE PABP87 BUILDING TYPE f *** DFFICE *** BUILDING TITLE PALOMAR AIRPORT BUS. PARK BALANCE-POINT TEMF1ER·1~TUl~ES AND DEGREE--DAYS INPUT -================--==. =======· =-= .. -=-·============:====== DAY NIGHT -. -------------4- BPT1 48. 04 ~ ..• BPT1 -6~-5. BPTf: = 56. 09-BPT2 = 74. BPT3 -56. 09 BPT3 -74. HDD = o. 00 HDD = 25':-)5. CDD -i 9L~L 54 CDD ·- ENVELOPE H~AT TRANSFER FACTORS (BTU/HR-Fl ===.:=== ·--·============== ---===============::=====::;:::::::::::::::: O~ERALL BUILDINS ENVELOPE HEAT·tRANSFER RATE <WINTER) UVERAL~ HEAT TRANSFER FA~TOR 'K' <WINTER> OVERALL BUILDING ENVELOPE HEAT .TRANSFER RATE (SUMMtR) OVERALL HEAT TRf-~NSFER Ff-iCTOR '1-1-5 (SUMMf-J<) HEf-HING CODLING- ANNUAL LOADS (MBTu~s) ===================== ANNUAL ijITE ENERGY REQUIAEMENTS (MBTU~S) ===============================~======== SITE HE(-HINb SIT!~ COOLING SITE LIGHTING SI Tf.::.: RECEPTACLE SJTE. FAN SITE HOT WATER 1. 8':3 56 56. 17. 17 ANNUAL SOURCE ENERGY USE ESTIMATE (KBTU/SQ.FT.). ===== ========================================= ' . SOURCE HEATING SOURCE COOLING SOURCE LIGtITING SOURCE RECEPTt~CL.E SOURCE FAN SOURCE HOT ~.JATER j_ 8(>. 5 ,2;(i8. () 1 E~-2" "~· i~'39. \3 1..0 o. '+ 5.7 J.Lj .• ,.,. 4.8 6.6 (l. L:. 1. ~3 20.0 5(>. 3 :LE-. 8 23. l. 1.4 =·==== ==================~ == ========.======================== ~= TOTAL ANNUAL SOURCE ENERGY USE ESiIMATE 112.9 KBTU/SQ.FT. ~·=~==== ========~ =====·=========== =. =. ======================== ( NOTE: ·1 KWH= ~0.239 KBTUS OF SOURCE ENERGY) PAGE 35 ;( ' ************ ******-K· SCM ENERGY ANALYSIS MODEL •l\--l<·***-l<."·**-X·-)(·*·* ***-l::·1HH1;- ** DEVELQPED BY ADM ASSOCIATES, INC. ** **************************************************** FILE Nf-=!ME BUILDING TYPE BULL.DING TITLE Af{EA (SQ.FT.) *·l<:·.***·lf**-l(·***·* . - -• PABP88 PRIMr=!F<Y DATA ·***"*··****¥-·*·**" *** OFFIC~ *** ~~LOMA~AIRPORT BUS. PARK Ex:-rERI OR "'Jf..)L,L •••••••.••.•••• -. ••••••••..•• " . • • • • • . • • . . 14() W~NDOW NORTH/NORTHEAST~····•••••••••••••••••••••••• 0 E;AST /-SOUTHEAST l60 SOUTH/SOUTHWEST ......••..........•....•..... 0 t.JEST . / NO RT Ht.JEST •••• .,. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0: ROOF . . a a## a & a a# a'a a a a a a a Ca a Na a Na a N N # a a a~ a al AN a a N # a N Na~ a a a 7BO t:i Rc1LtND FLoo R •.•••••••• ·~· •••••••••••• ~ ••• ,, ••••••••••• u • ,, -l BC> TOl"f-=!L CONDITIONED FLOOR •••••••••••••• ·•••••• • • • • • • • • • • 7t30 ?R7 -VALUE (EXCLUDING FILM RESISTANCES) ************************************** WAl_LS a • • • • • • a • • • a a • • • , • Jt ., • • • • • • • • •• • • • • a • t1 n: • u n 11 • ,. 11 ii 11 11 • LJ .• f.~ WINDOW <INCLUDING INSIDE·FILM RESISTANCE) ............. 9 f~.()QF u • • • • • • • • • • • • u • • :11 • .. • " • N II • • .; • • c • • • • • ll Ill • n U • • • • • • u • n 2~;M ~5 f:"L_.OQR "" .. 111 • • w • • ,_ ~ • • !' • ·~· •, .. a 11 111 .. • • .. a " a 111 • • • 11 111 • i: n • • • • a ,. " J:1 " ., ;a (:) HVAC SYSTEM *·**"***·****·* HEATING EQUIPMENT TYPE COOLING EQUIPMEN·r TYPE . ~ . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . " . . . . . . . . . . ECONOMIZER ••.~.••a a .. • a• 1111 •••••"•a a• a a.,,.• a• a a••• a• w • • • N • • • HEf"-ff PUMP AIR CONDITIONER NO fAN POWER (WATTS/SQ.FT.> ...• ~ •..••.•..•..••....•...... 5 AIR CIRCULATION RATE (CFM/SQ._FT.) •••••••••••••••••••• l- OTH!=: ~~ **.*;** : ~ AiIMUTH OF NORTHERN BUILDING ORIENTATION •••••••••••.• 0 SHAD I NG COEFF I C_I ~'.::NT • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 65 HEAT CAPACITY OF EXT. WALL CBTU/F-SQ.FT.> .•....•...•. l5.6 LIGHTif\~G LEVEL (WATTS/SG!.FT.) ........... -.. : ................... 1;5 FLOOR --rvJ::~E ..... :· ••••••••••••.••••••••••••• · ••••••...••• CLIMATE ZONE a N Jt a JI Jt JI Jt • 111 Ill II a D a • a a a a a ii! a a JI a a a N N N a a a a a a • • a a PAGE 36 SLAB 7 ( ( ************ SCM ******* ** ENER~0 ANALYSIS MODEL DEVELOPED BY ADM ASSOCIATES, INC. **************************************************** PHYSICAL PARAMETERS *******************" SECCJNDc:rny D(-1T(-1 ***.******~t*''*'* DOD R ARE~} ( S(;! • FT• ) • • • M • • • • • N • N • • • •· • • • • -• • • • N • A • • • "' a a • ~ ,: u a ~ 111 • ~==!() DOOR 'R'-VALUE <EXCLUDING FILM RESISTANCES) •••.........•.... 1.96 _ t,...1(-)LL ABSORPTIVITY ...... · ...•.....•....•......... .-. ~ ~ .. ~ ...... . ROOF ABSORf.=··r :t ~; I ·rv · .. · .... : .......... ,. . " . JI •••••••••••• ~ u • " ,. .,. " • ,. D ,. CEILING HEIGHT <FT. i •••••••••••••••••••••.•••.••••••••••••.• $ SHADING *'*·***** SHADING COEFFICIENT : NORTH/ ND fffHEJ'.'..)ST Ef-mT /SOUTHEAST SOUTH/EOUTHt,.JEST • 65 r· .::· a c:,~_l ~ WEST /NORTHWEST ..•....•........•.•..... 65 DOES THIS BUILDING HAVE WINDOW OVERHANGS ..•.........••..•... YES DOES THIS BUILDING HAVE WINDOW SIDE-FTNS ..........•......... NO MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL ************************* RATED HEATING EFFICIENCY •.•••..•..••..••..•..•......• ~······· 3 ~ATED COOLING EER WATEF< HEATER TYPE N. N N N a N N N N N N NM N N N N N •.• N N •NS N N NM•~ N N N N ~ U J a N N N N N • N N N N N a N N N N N N N a U N N N N N N N N N N # W N N M • U U ~ U N N M • M 9 ELECTF<IC ·sPECIAL FEATURES "**************** DAYLIGHTING STRATEGIES.~ ••••••••••••••••••••••••.••.•••••••• NO SOLAR WATER HEATING SYSTEM .....•..•.••.•......•....•......•. NO PAGE 37 ·lE--l<·********** ***'*·*** SCM ENERGY ANALYSIS MODEL ·IE-* DEVELOPED BY ADM ASSOCIATES, INC. ******~********************************************* OVERHANG CHARACTERISTICS (FT~) ****************************** l\!ORTH/.NORTHEAST WINDOW HEIGHT .......••...•.....•.......•.. 8 OVERHANG HEIGHT FROM BASE OF WINDOW .....•.. 8.5 OVERHAMB EXTENSION FROM WINDOW • • • • • • • • • • • • :.:i EAST /SOUTHEAST : t,J I NDO!,J HEIGHT ••••••••••• ~ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 8 OVERHANG HEIGHT .. ;FROM BAS!:: OF WINDm~ • • • • • • • a. 5 ~-. OVERHANG EXTENSION FROM WINDOW .•••........ 5 SOUTH/SOUTHWEST : t,JINDOl..J HEIGHT ... . • . . . • . . . . . • • . . . . . . • . . . • • • . 8 OVERHANG HEIGHT FROM BASE OF WINDOW .....•. · 8.5 OVERHANG EXTENSION FRO~ WINDOW ..... ; •....• 5 WEST /NORTHWEST : WINDOW .HEIGHT ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 8 OVERHANG HEIGHT FRO~ BASE OF WINDOW ......• 8.5 OYERHANG EXTENSION FROM WINDOW··~··••••••• 5 PAGE 38 -: ... :, . ·.(_ (, SCM . *******·~**** ·****·Ji!-*·* ENERGY ANALYSIS MdDEL ***·f***·*'*·**·.;, ***·***·i(- ** DEVELOPED BY.ADM ASSOCIATES, INC. ** *********************************************~****** fiCHEDULING ********** FIXED Df-=!TA -M··lE-*·lHE-·lE-**** OCCUPANCY LEVEL FOR OPERATIONAL ~1ERIDDS <FRAc·rroN> : l)f)Y ............... _ ... "............ . 4j.E, N:tlSl .. iTS ....• IC ••••••••• -.......... C)38 AVERAGE LIGHTING AND RECEPT(-=!CLE L.:l~VEL FOR OPERATIONAL PERIODS <tRACTI0N> :DAY PERIOD ........•... 703 : NIGHT PERI.OD ••••••••• · •. 156 EQUIVALENT OPERATIONAL HOURS PER YEAR :LIGHTING <DAYS) •..... 2915 :LIGHTING (NIGHTS) •... 359 ;: RE-:c:1;.=.J:i·r1~c:c_i:: 11 • ":u :, " • " " ,i • • 3i:.=~·7 .l:} :FANS ••... · .... ~ ..... -~ 4518 : WATER l-lEAT.ER ~ ....... =· 1 770 NUMBER OF NON-OPERATIONAL HOURS ¢ER WEEK J)(4Y J:1E f~ 10}) ii: • • • a II ir • If • 11 • • • JC • tc • • i:r • • n • ~ • • • • • A # • 11. 11 • ,. u a a ::i • 1. = :t 32 NIGf·1T ~=1E~.f~I(ji) ......•. ·-. •· •....• -.. !' ., • ,, 11 ••• , • •· •• , u ;I ;I ••• ., 1:1..... Li-f., NUMBER OF HOLIDAYS DURING HEATING SEASON •••••••• ~ ••••••••••• 7 NUMBER OF HOLIDAYS DURING COOLING SEASON .............•...... 3 SET-·PDINT TEMPERATURE (F) t,HNTER • • •••••••••••••••••••••••• 70 PHYSICAL PARAMETERS ******************* INSIDE FILM RESISTANCE : WINTER SETBACK ............•..... 40 : SUMMER ••••••••••NN••••••aaua.i••= ·i'B SUMMER SETUP . . If -I • Q' -' U .;, ,. •a /If 0::: ol II' J A -1 II • M • t~-::.j WALLS : . ROCJF.... • ..................... = ;I :II •• ., • • • • • • • ·75 : F.LOO'R •••••• = •••••. ·-•••••• : ••••• II ........ • • -16 VENTIU-=!TION RAl)::: (CFM/SQ. FT. ) .••••••••••••••••• ~ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 13 INFILTRATION RATE· DURING NON-·OPERf-HIONAL HOURS (CFJYi/SQ. FT.) • ."0284· SLAB FLOOR 'U'-VAL~E <BTU/HR-SQ.FT.-F> ....•.•.... , .....•.. ~ .. 0862 .t l\{f'ERNAL .LOADS AND; ENERGY, I ************************* RECEPTACLE PEAK LOAD <WATTS/SQ. FT. > • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ;.:1 WATER HEATING (BTU/SQ.FT./YEAR) •.....••....••••.•..•... · •••.. 64 PEOPLE SENSIBLE LOAD <BTU/HR/PERSON~ •..•...••••.•...••. -••... 230 PEOPLE U-=!TENT LOAD ( BTU/HR/PEf-<SON) . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • .• • • • • i ':30 i'.=lREA PER _PERSON (SQ. FT. /PERSON) • . . • . • • • • • • • • • . • . . . . . • . . • . • . . 250 PAGE 39 _,_. ~ **********·*-IHE· *·*"**-lC·*** SCM -lri·*********·l\'** ENERGY ANALYSIS MODEL ******** *** COPYRIGHT 1985, CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION*** : 7 DATE : 08-03-1987 CLIMC~TE ZONE BUILDING FILE BUILDING TYPE BUILDING TITLE: :. PABP88 **~ OFFICE *** PALOMAR AIRPORT BUS. PAR!-< BALANCE-POINT TEMPERATURES AND OEGREE-DAYS INPUT ============ ======== ========================== DAY NIGHT -"--_________ .. ____ ... _ BPT1 = i~9. 51. BPT1 --E,6" BPT2 -c:·c-.:-00 "'-:J,,:.:J., BPT2 = 74. BPT3 = 55. 00 BPT3 ·-74. HDD = o. 00 HDD --2698. CDD --i2231. 75 CDD ·-- ENVELOPE HEAT TRANSFER FACTORS (BTU/HR-Fl === ============· =~===========~========== OVERALL BUILDING ENVELOPE HEAT TRANSFER RATE (WINTER) :OVERALA_.HEAT TRANSF~R ~ACTOR ~K' <WINTI~R> ·OVERALL BUILDING ENVELOPE HEAT TRANSFER RATE (SUMMER> OVE::RALL. HEAT TRANSFER Ff-1CTOR 'l-<' (SUMMER) HEATING COOL.ING ANNUAL LOADS <MBTU'S> ------------------------------------------ ANNUf-)L SITE ENERGY f<EG!Uif<E/'riENTS (iYiBTU~ Si __ .... _,.. ..... -,·-.. -· .... -...... , ..... ·-·-----.......... _ .. _, ..... ______ , .... , __________ .. ____ --·---·--- SITE HEf.iT=ING S.L Tl:-.. COOLING· SITE LIGHTING SITE RECEPTACLE: SITE FAN SITE HOT WATER 1. i=!3 55 ~55 75 18- ANNUAL SOURCE ENERGY USE ESTIMATE (KBTU/SC!.FT;) . . --------------------------=-.-=~--=-L-~===-==== SOURCE HEATING SOURCE COOLING SOURCE LIGHTING SOURCE REGEPTACLE SOURCE FAN SOURCE HOT WATER l j_ 96. 6 31f~ .. 2 Li o • .t+ 6 .. 2 i 3. l Lr u Li,. 6.0 (l • L~ 1.~i 23.8 5(>. :~; 1€,. a 23. 1 1.4- ========. ================ ===== ==· ===== =======--======~-====== TOTAL ANNUAL SOURCE ENERGY USE ESTI~AtE 116.9 KBTU/SQ.FT. ===========-==========·==· ===·-===== ·========-===================== < NOT!;:: 1 1-<WH = ·10. i:239 KBTUS OF SOURCE ENERGY ) PAGE 40 ,. ' $. Ii, ,/ ************ SCM ************ ******* EN~RGY ANALYSIS MODEL ******* ** DEVELOPED BY ADM ASSOCIATES, INC. ** **************************************************** FILE NAME BUILDING TYPE BUILDING TITLE AREA (SQ.FT.) ********'l<·**** PABP8'3 PRIMr=ir~Y DATA *********'*** ,: *'*·* OFF I CE '*'*'*· : PALOMA~AIRPORT BUS. PARK EX-rE~<IOR WAl-L •. -: ••••••..•..••••.••• " •••••..•••...• i: •••• 34-(> WINDOW NORTH/NORTHEAST~ ....•.•••.•......... ~ ....... 40 . EAST /SOUTHEAST SOUTH/SOUTHWEST : WEST /NORTHWEST ••• .. •••••• .. •••••••••a.1••••••• . . . a a a a N U a a ~ a a a N P a a C X a N a ~ a a • a a a • ' ' 80 ;~=~oo o. F<Q(jF M II a 1111 N a a N N N N • a a a a i,; tf • a M Ill a a .• N a a N IC N N a a N .N a II' • M N IC U N ti II .-N a 1111 f~t':,() GR(JlJND F"LQOR • • a:. • a • • a • • • • • • • • • w • • • • a • a u • • a • a N ; • " a a " • a 86() TOTAL CONDITIONED FLOOR .... · •.........•••...•...•..... 860 'R'-VALUE <EXCLUDING FILM RESISTANCES) ************************************** Wf'.'..1LLS . . . • • • • • • • . • . . . . . . . . . . • . • . . . . . . . . • • . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1+. 8 WINDOW CINCLUDtNG INSIDE FILM RESIStANCE) ....•...•.... 9 F:OOF" • ,, •• · ••• ., ,. -••••••• ,. • " • • • .. .. • .. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 23. !:,1 FL.Ott R ....•..•....•............................ ~ . · .. _-. . . 0 HVf-)C SYSTEM *'***-l(·-l(··lE-*-l(·** HEATING EQUIPMENT TYPE COOLING EQUIPMENT TYPE •11•••••1111111••••••,•••••••ti••••••• a a a a a a a a a a a a • a a a. a a a a a J N a a M.a Ma a ECfJNOMIZER ••••• · •••••• ,.· •••..•••••. ~ •••. ~ •..••• ~ ••. · ..... -FAN POWER (WATTS/SQ.FT.) ....••••...•.•.....•....•.... A IR CI RGLILAT J CJN : RAl~E -( CFM/SQ. F"T. ) ••• ~ .. -•.. · ....... w-•••••• OTHER -*-l(·*** HEJ'.=-H PtJfrjp f-HR CONDITIONER NO · . 5 AZ1MUTH OF NORTHERN BUILDING ORIENTATION ....•........ 0 SHADIN~ COEFFICIENT •.•.•....•....•.•.•............•.•. 65 HEAT CAPAC I TY OF EXT. WALL (_BTU/F-SQ. F'T. ) • • • • • • • • • • • • 15. 6 · -LIGHTING LEVEL (WATTS/SQ.FT.) .•.•••.••.•...••...•.... 1.5 FLOOR TYl=1E •••••••••••••••.• • ••• ~ ................. " ••• ~ .SLAEi · CLilYIATE ZONE •• ,. ,. •••• ,. • ··~ • ••• ,. ••.••• · ................... 7 PAGE 41 ******-l<·***** ***·*'*'*'*· SCM ENERGY ANALYSIS MODEL ~·*****·llHi-**-lHf **'*'*'*·'*--"-' ** DEVELOPED BY ADM ASSOCIATES, INC. ,l(-·X· **************************************************** PHYSICAL PARAMETERS ******************* SECONDARY DRfl'.:i ***'*·'*·****~J(·-M·** DOCtR At1EA <SG!. F .. r. ) ....... -........ ,. ........... ,. &l ••• N " ••• u • ,. u • 2(> DOOR 'R'-VALUE <EXCLUDING FILM RESISTANCES) ....•.....•...... 1.96 i,JALL ABS[JRJ:' .. f'IVI"TY a••~••••••••••••••.-·.•,.~ 11 • ,• e • u 11 a:•,.•~ u-11 • ".· • • 11 1J • (:; t~oot-=-t~BSOf~J:1T i VI l'"Y 11 ti •• 11 a • II ti ti • II • 11 U II ll U fl II II ti ti U II 11 ;r a a 11 ~ A • 11 N 11 •• N .J i, 11 11 '111 A • :.::t CEIL I NG HEIGHT. (FT. ) • •. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • 8 SHADING *;" ·X-·lH~·-l<:-* * SHADING COEFFICIENT NOFffH/NORTHEAST : EAST /SOUTHEAST . 65 ~ SOUTH/SOUTHvJEST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . .. . • . . . . 65 WEST /1\IQRTHWEST • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • E,;5 · DOES THIS BU):LDING Hf-lVE i.JINDOW DV~RHf'.:JN[:lS • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • YEE DOES THIS BUILDING HAVE WINDOW SIDE-FINS .....•..•........... NO MECHANICAL (.)ND ELECTRICAL **·*·**-l(··lE--lE-·X-·Jc:·-l(·*·*·***".(·*·X-·X-*·***·* RATEb HEATINS EFFICIENCY •..• ~ .••••.•.••••....•.•........•... 3 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • '3 RAlED"COOLING EER WATER HEATER TYPE a • a a • a a a • a a M a ~ X M a a a M a a a a U Z a M U a a a a N a a a a a a Z M a ELECTRIC SPEGIAL FEATURES **************** DAYLIGHTINC; STRATEGIES ••••••••••••••••••••••••• , • • • • • • • • • • • • • NO SOU~R WATt::R HEATING SYSTEM . • • . • . . • . • . • . • . . . . . • • . . . . . • . . . . • . • NO ,, PAGE 42 , , .. ******* ** SCM ***·*-lt:··ll··lfc:~-i::-·X··lE-* ENERGY ANALYSIS MODEL DEVELOPED BY ADM ASSOCIATES, INC. -*· -i." * -*· -*· ·X· *· ·llc·l*- *******************************************~******** OVERHANG CHARAtTERIBTICS C~T. > ******~"***********'* .. "*·****'*"***·** NORTH/NORTHE(-=\°ST : WINDOW HEIGHT ••••••••••••••• -. •• , ••• , ••••• ", 8 OVERHANG HEIGHT FROM BASE OF WINDOW ••..... 8.5 OVERHf-11'1B EXTENSION FROM l.JINDOlrJ • • • • • • • • • • • • 5 EAST / SOUTHEf.)ST : v-J I NDOv-J HEIGHT . . • . • • • • . . • . . . . . • • . • . • . • . . . . . 8 OVERl-!ANG HEIGH1:-:.-Fl~OM BASE OF WINDOW ••••••• 8. 5 OVERHANG EXTENSION FROM WINDOW •. ~ .....•... 5 SOUTH/SOUTHt,.JEST : WINDOW HEIGHT .• • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 8 OVERHANG HEIGHT FROM BASE OF WINDOW ••••••• 8.5 OVERHANG EXTENSION PROM WINDO~ •••••••••• ·,~ 5 WEST /NORTHWEST WINDOW HEIGHT ..•....•......••... ~ ........ : & OVERHANG HEIGHT FROM BASE OF WINDOW~ .. , ... 8.5 OVEHHANG EXTENBION FROM WINDOi-J ••. • •••••••.•• ~; PAGE 43 ************ SCM *'*·*-K··******** ENERGY ANALYSIS MODEL ******* *****·*'* ** DEVELOPED BY ADM ASSOCIATES, INC. ** · ~CHE DUL r_NG . ***'*'*·***'*·-Y.· FIXED DATJ'.=l **'***-!=."*·i<·*·* . 0CCUP1~NCY LEVEL FOR OPERATIONAL PERJ0DS (FRACTION) : DAY •....•.•.•••........•.••.• 416 : f\11: Gl~iTS .................... ., . . • • • (>38 - AVERAGE LIGHTING AND RECEPT<·1CLE LEVEL FOR OPERATIONAL PERIODS <FRACTION) :DAY PERIOD ....•. ~ ..... 703. :i\lIGt-rr ~,r:::RIOi) .......... -~156 ~QUIVALENT OPERATIONAL HOURS PER YEAR :LIGHTING (DAYS) .•.... 2915 :LIGHTING (NIGHTS) .... 359 :RE~EPTACLE ......•..•. 3274 :FAJ\J~3, ••• : ... ~·········~-L~518. : WATl;:R HEATER . . • . . . . • • 1 77() NUMBER OF NON-OPERATrONAL HOURS PER WEEK DAY J:1ER_):OD a a a a• a M • a a•# a•••• ,r a••·• a a• rr • a a"••••••• a: 11 a a•• n " ,2;i_::: NIGl--il'" f,:tERIOI) ••.••••••• " •• J;I • ., •••••• " .............. » ••••• ,,.,." .f.~5 NUMBER OF HOLIDAYS DURING HEATING SEASON ..•....••..•......•. 7 NUMBER OF HOLIDAYS DURING COOLING SEASON .•..•..•....•..••.•. 3 SET·-P0INT TEffiPERATURE (F) ~ WINTER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . • . 70 PHYSICAL PARAMETERS ******************* : WI NTEI~ !:::it::. I .l:lHCK • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 40 :: sur,1t11E R • l,Z • • • • •• " _ A • • A • A = • • .. = • " s; • u .. , s : SUMM!;.::i~ SETUP .....• ~ . , . " . . . . . . . . . B.5 INSIDE FILM RESISTANCE : WALLS 0 68, C ROOF ••.••••.... ~ .......... " ........... . • 76 F=!LOOR •••••••••••• Ill • It • ·-Jf ,: • N • • • • • • • • • • -,7 6 . VENTILATION RATE (CFM/SQ. FT.) •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 13 INFILTRATION RATE DURING NON-OPERATIONAL HOURS (CFM/SQ.F1~ > •• 028~ · S\_AB FLOOR 'U' :_VALUE (BTU/HR-SQ.FT. -F) . . .. . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . • • • . 08E..2 I~TERNAL LOADS AND ENER~~ ************************* RECEf:1TACLE ~'EAK LOAD < ~JAT .. rs1sc~. p·r. > • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • .. • 5 ~ATER HEATING (BTU/SQ.FT./YEAR> .•.•.••..•.••.•• _ .. ; .•.....••.. 64 PEOPLE SENSIBLE ·LOAD (BTU/HR/PERSON) •••••••·······~·····••••• ~~u PEOPLE LATENT LOAD (BTU/HR/PERSON) ••••••• -••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 190 AREA PER PERSON (SQ. FT. /PERSON) .•.•....•• · •.•••..•. _ ••.•.... · .•• 2e'i0 / ·PAGE 44 ·************* SC!Yi ******** :ENERGY ANALYSIS MODEL ******** *** COPYRIGHT 1985, CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION*** CLIMATE ZONE BUILDING:FILE BUILDING TYPE. BUILDJ;NG TITLE·: 7 DAfE ~ 08-03-1987 PABP89 *** OFFICE *** PALOMAR AIRPORT BU$. PARK BALANCE-POINT TEMPERATURES AND D~GREE-DAYS INPUT ______ ! _________ ---------------. --- DAY N.IGHT ______ .. ,..._ .. -_.,_ -__ ,. ... --·,_.,___ . --... --.. ··---- BPTl == 48. 19 ~-BPT1 ... 55. BPT2. --58.73 BPT2 :::: 75,1 BPT3 ·-58.73 BPT3-::: 7i::: ....J. HDD = o.oo HDD = .27t'35. CDD -13L~L 83 CDb == o. ,ENVELOPE HEAT TRANSFER FA,CTORS (BT,L!/HR--F) =================-, ======== -.. :--=.:==.-: _-:::::::::."::::::'-:==~r-=::::::::: OVERALL BUILDING ENVELOPE HEAT TRANSFER RATE (WINTER>· OVERALL HEAT TRANSFER FACTOR 'K' <WINTER) OVERALL BUILDING ENVELOPE Hi;::AT TRANSFER RATE (.SUMM.ER) OVERALL HEAT TRANSFER FACTOR 'K~ <SUMMER> HEATING COOLING ANNUAL LOADS (MBTU'S) ===================== ANNUAL SITE ENE~GY REQUIREMENTS CMBTU'S) ================================n=========== SITE HEATING. SI TE COOL ING- SI TE LIGHTING SITE RECEPTACLE SITE. FAN SITE HOT WATER C 5-4. 2 1i· ;;:=;.<'.~ ()~~~ 7-l~ ANNUAL SOURCE ENE:RGY US£; ESTIMATE (H:BTU/SG"!. FT.) ===============·=====·=== ===================== == SOURCE. HEATING. __ SOURCE COOLING! SOURCE -LIGHTIN0 -, SOURCE RECEPTACLE SOURCE FAN SdURCE HOT ~ATE~ .l~i:35. 6 ~~/~3. :() 490.3 1.8 10.5 0.6 E=h l3 6.6 o. 4 2. 2 - 50.3 16.8 23. 1. =-=---====-=========·======================================.====== . TOTAL ANNUAL SOURCE ENERGY USE ESTIMAT~ 117.4 KBTU(SQ.FT. ====--==---=== --=======:-=================-===--====--==---==--- NOTE: 1 KWH 10 •. 239 KBTUS OF SOURCE ENERGY ) /- PAGE 45 : ************* SCM ************* ******** ENERGY ANALYSIS MODEL ******** *** COPYRIGHT 1985, CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION*** HEATING COOLING ANNUAL LOADS (MBTU'S) =~------------------- ANNUAL SITE ENERGY REQUIREMENTS <MBTU'S)· ===----= .. --. __ .... _, ~ ---·-----·---------_ .. __ ------.. SITE HEATING SITE COOLING SITE LIGHTING ,('¥ SITE RECEPTACLE $ITE F?)N SITE H.OT ltJATER ANNUAL SOURCE ENERGY USE ESTIMATE CKBTU/SQ.FT.) ================================= ===-~=== ~=== SOURCE )·IEf"HING SOURCE COOLING- SOURCE LIGHTING SOURCE RECEPTACLE SOUf<CE FAN SOURCE HOT WAT~R 11. 7 80. '3 4-. 2 5E+. i 11 ~i. 3 38. i~ 53. (> 3. 1 o. £,:; 23.b 16.6 23,. l 0.5 ============= ?==========~~=======--=====---====-----:~-----=---- tOTAL ANNUAL SOURCE ENERGY USE ESTIMATE 114.8 KBTU/SQ.FT •. ---=-=-= --==------===-~----==-~----=-~--------------~-------=---- ·~ ( NOTE.: 1 1-<WH == 10. 239 KBTUB OF SOURCE ENERGY ) / PAGE 46 < ? • i ., ' .. ~ ·.-... C I T Y O f C A R L S B A D DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING SERVICES APPLICATION AND COST ESTIMATE Of SANITARY SEWER LATERAL.CONNECTION f· I WORK ORDER NO.: 6'7--.257' PART I -TO BE COMPLETED BY DPS SEWER LOCATION: BUILDING PLAN CHECK NO.: ADDRESS:· .:2.0'9/ /4/?S ~M/IS' . ...z::k-_ APN: -Z/3--~-~-...;...,-~-g- LEGAL oEscRIPnoN: ~z: B t::1,&:" M"9P .No. /e;06/ ::::::Cr&-3.3 ) ~ ;;> CONTACT PERSON: &/~-_ /f?'Aes# PHONE NO.: S6?-~~ kf-1 MINIMUM 6 INCH ABS SEWER PIPE IN PLACE -NOT TO E~CEED $ 8/0. ~ 10 FEET PEEP AND 30 LINEAL FEET HORIZONTAL DISTANCE. 1=1 ... . '• ... ,, ADDIITONAL CHARGES FOR ANY DISTANCE EXCEEDING 30 LINEAL FEET HORIZONTALLY FEET AT PER FOOT ------. . . .,, . . . . . ,,.. ADDITIONAL CHARGES FOR ANY DEPTH EXCEEDING 10 FEET ~-FEET DEEP AT .· PER FOOT ~e.te ~/G MPA/~- ADDITIONAL CHARGES FOR PLUGGING EXISTING SEWER LATERAL TOTAL CHARGES FOR CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONAL CHARGES FOR CITY OF CARLSBAD SERVICES AT 50% OF ABOVE CHARGES TOTAL CHARGES 1911 ACT A.O. NO.: DWG. NO.: PART II -TO BE COMPLETED BY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT FOR SEWER LOCATION $ ___ _ $ bl7. ~ ·. $ ---- $ ___ _ Main Depth: Lateial Depth at Property: --- DPD2:FORM:DPD8 l 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92009-4859 Office of the City Engineer QtittT nf Qtarlsbah DATE =-M~A""""Y'---'-l--',1-, J_;;;V8;.,<-,7 __ _ Jack Thomas COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO Department of Public Works· 5454 Ruffin Road San Diego, CA 92123 INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT APPLICATION NO. Enclosed is a copy of the appiication for an Industrial Waste Discharge Permit from the subject applicant. Your review and recommendations on this application will be appreciated prior to the issuance of a waste disposal permit. ' = ~---------- LLOYD B. HUBBS City Engineer LBH:SEE:lch Enclosure: Application No. c: Building Department Fred Rowlen., Encinas Plant Arnie Wing, Department of Health Services TELEPHONE (619) 438-11{t! l I l .i . . COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL APPLICATION FORM FOR INDUSTRIAL WASTE DISCHARGE PERMIT CITY OF CARLSBAD APPLICATION: NEW i/ (CHECK ONE) REVISED ---- ~~ k;/,,., •• . ~ature of City Representative BUILDING P.C. NO.: APPLICATION NO.: INDUSTRIAL CLASS: 3 / _....;... __ _ DATE: 5-12-87 APPLICATION FOR INDUSTRIAL WASTE DISCHARGE PERMIT A. GENERAL: SITE APPLICANT: :ze446 l/4itJO ~P. 11-)6. ADDRESS: &'c:A I CAS .PA(./VJ~ £ TYPE OF BUSINESS: <!JfrlC.,/E::, /;AJttJcJ,ST/2//.J.-l- APPLICANT'S ADDRESS: £;eO N, ~,,a R,-C,V/.?, (-L,6J.tJAGtt:-,CA ~/2-03 '~ IZ.-8""7 B. WASTES ANO PROCESSING: (Check where applicable) l2(0omestic Waste Only 1-1 Industrial Waste 1-1 Industrial Waste NOT -Discharged to Sewer -Discharged to Sewer GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WASTE -(Chemical and Physical Characteristics of proposed waste): Cl:Y-4tz-677G --------------------------------- GENERAL DESCRIPTION Of PROCESS ( If Applicable) : A/ /4 _ ___......,., ....... ________ _ ,C. WASTES TO BE DISCHARGED TO SEWER: WASTE: (Check One) TREATED: UNTREATE_,D_: __ --,.,.......------ APPLICANT OR REPRESENTATIVE OF FIRM: TITLE: r~~ . SIGNATURE: 71/L~ /:L :__:::-. ( QUANTITY: AVERAGE ____ GPO (Daily) MAXIMUM .:?JifJ GPO (Gallons Per Day) Jt.1./,:<-tM ~f!/C.i,-,JS /:rf?'-04';7~e-,775 Ccor-113 · M/E-<.--Qv i T/t · (Print) DATE: ~~12, ·P...7 -----~---------- 11c>''"~·---.:, ; l'l ' t' I 1:· Ii t1 ' l ,t ,. ( :.1 ';: 'J 1 ' ~,.41 '" -. 'Jf.•···· 1•"., ;4 -*~l , '~-\;,,, :,, • -~-~:;r.1 '-AS ... ,,,,q.J,,:.:.f!,..;. .... ,~ .,. ... ) ?ACtv'\AS ----------cr~:=·-=~~~-a, ~-,1~ £-"lJ"· 1 1 l, 1~ .;.";--~ J1'?; ~ CL-1"1 · (SHELL) -- YsG:c_ COIRECTION LIST • ..,,, ¾ 1 1/10 t,, ~ i f L- \ '),I ;;,)_'(\x1~ --- ., -·----1Jfff~ fiCD ,,,,~-_...-.. _,_,._.,._ c57"'d-B S c(y'1i'4 /;1~ '7Jt ·4 ,/ oYfl:. AGREEMEN7~ / SCHOOL FEE FORM \~ , ~ .I '""«yr? ~f 0 PERMIT SIGNED BUSINESS qt. &-~ WC COMP PLN-'ENG CORRECT ~ ~'-tuaxJ--V ~- ~ -...-,,,. __ ... ' -.-. ~1r-----·· . -~,-.,....~··(<'f'' f,,,,jp..t:. PLANr,:;..:G ENGINEERING ~ UTILITIES * FIRE WATER OleTRICT BUILDING GtEARJ!D JUL 191QOO -;~~z~~r~.::f .:;~ .. :,.,::-:.~~ ': ',' I ~ • t ', ,;~-<