Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2091 RUTHERFORD RD; ; CB962035; Permit1/ I -,. 10/21/97 12:33 Page 1 of 1 B U I L D I N G P E RM-~ T Permit No: CB962035 Project No: A96028~8 .Development No: ,lob Address : 2 0 91 RUTHERFORD Rb Suitf;}: Permit Type: INDUSTRIAL BVTLDING Parcel No: 212-120-25-00 Valuation: · 2,440,085 ·Lot#: 51 0504 10/21/97 0001 01 . C-PRMT 02 385893-21 Oc.cupancy Group: Reference#: Description: 108,863 SF SHELL TILT-UP BLDG : LOT 51,PC 961914 Appl/Ownr: MARSCH, RICHARD· 6640 LUSK BLVD STE 205 C 619 Cohstruction Type: NEW Status: ISSUED Applied: 1·0/21/96 Apr/Issue: ·c10/21/97 En.tered .By: 'RMA · 546-1121 _-. SAN DIEGO CA 9 2121 .. ~~-------. *** Fees Required **-* _,,,,.../~--;_;* __ p'e;~,Collect~d & Credi ts . 'k*1~ ------· --------------------7"'/ . _____ ,,..-, _ _/":, ---->-------. --· ----------. -----. .. ,,--") ·tr I\ .,--...... ....... - . _Fees: 390, 3--06,,"21 ,,.,. .. "\ (....--.. , \.~# 1 t1 '\ / o J ~ ", · AdJ·ustments: // 00/ _,.,., . ....._',\\( . ---..., __ ..,;>cnrot.a.l/ c~1edi &s: · • , ( I• > ... / ;I: , 00 Total Fees! 390,f0-6,2±(0 · Totalu·P4y~b,ts'-\ , 4,413.00 / · -·./":?0 .. , · ..,..__J:la1~¢V Dut : 3 8 5 , 8 9 3 , 21 Fee description / ~---¾ ~1 / ~(.,-fV iliirilts---..., 1&~/Unit . Ext fee Data -Building -Permit ---(~r_j~::: /~-----~~,~~--~ "\ ~ , 1--... , ._-64 2 2. 0 o ----- 'Plan Check i \· ) / '\,._ ~~:-··/ . _\ 1,../' \ 4174. oo Strong Motion Fee I ·r 1 [·'\ / . ,, /:,_}'····,,.. ·A}\ fol \ 512.'00 Enter "Y" t<:' Autoc{a,1_6..:-:-e:'JF;F. ,~, . ;:-. .-/CJ) \.,7 ) 44410.00 Y Enter Traff.le Impart fee \ ~>,J fl > /i'.Jf96ey,;,.o \~ I 11968. 00 l?ayoff Fee for CFD 1 .:-· , \ ~ • '"l{.___Ll 41 ~r It) ' . 244419. 21 Ente:r-Park Fee(ZonE\5/13,1~)' ~ s5s;:. _ / __ 43545.00 _05 * BUILDIN? TOTAL .. -\ / 1 v, C-~ , / 355450. 21 ·'Enter #Uni ts & Code-~ota93:~, W-ater i~co~P~t,!\TED i r.~; /· 15360. oo D2 Enter #Uni ts & -Code-Recl~~m-~\ii?tber > 1;:1f2 A\'-s.. \ t>;,-,. 1,5360. 00 D2' l::nter "t' ~or Plumbing\---.._,Is-s,e~_f'e.~~>----.x.~ \\\:)\> / 20. 0-0 Y E;:ach .$_u1ld1ng. Sewer "-,, \i//-1] r---. ©. \O)~:l;'_) . /~' 00 15. 00 Ea-ch Roof Drain ', ,,S. />5 Q 1;.·0 \)2, / 7. 00 • 84. 00 Each Install/Repair Water L5:n-Et 14 _ '.1/ V ~ ·z-. 00 7. 00 * PLUMBING TOTAL · ........._ ______ __.........,...~ . 12 6 . 0 0 ·E:µter "Y" for Electric __ I.ssue Fee > 10. oo Y Three Phase 480 Per AMP > 40·00 1. O'O 40.00. 00 * ELECTRICAL TOTAL 4010.0.0 · Enter -~ Y' for Mechanical :): s sue Fee> N· CITY OF CARLSBAD · 2075 Las Palmas Dr.-, Carl~pad, CA 92009 (619) 438-ll:6l .. ·~-·-··_._ Cfl-.=ft:,!) ?J .. QCl!:·· _ '. PERMIT APPUCA1lON -t":!._.._~ t~)f,.~ ... i..' ...... .City of Carlsbad Building Department ,,, '·2075 Las Palms Dr., tarlsbad, ,-CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 J', ;; · ·.f. f 1. PJ.tilM11' TYPE ,, ) \ t ,! ~ ' " I 1 · From IJst 1 (see back) give code-oi' Permit-Type: IIJl:)rJ:?T j • - -• ----------_,------------------------------t -• ----•• , -- For Residential Projects Only: From IJst2 (see back) give '-, __ Code of Structure-Type: -"lQ ~- Net Loss/Gain of Dwelling Units _________________ _ " :.- PLAN CHECK NO. tf {p -. \ 0\ ( ~ I ·'. 1~.VAT.· Ci 1..,\(o ~ 1-8 UD.B~, f:{)/1 1 .. 0; t1 f DATE · 0184 10/04/96 0001 01 C-PRHT 02 10115-{}0 ~ t I}:~~ \\ 2. PRQJECT INFORMATION \ ~ FOR OFFICE. USE ONLY ~ _. C 2> -1 30 JJ f-CA f4t.9dtJ'2 _··: 1 ~ -51 -/0~ ik 5-C-81 l,lp,5---, mt o. Phase o. - l -PROPOSED USE $I-HUA.,~& W/ ffl#;>'p:'{-) -5 ff1UL-8Vt"K?~ ~ # OF BEDROO,~§ ---# OF BATIIROOMS .u amerenc rrom appucantJ --, . NAME (last name first) ADDRESS -; -.! ~ =J•u=~ ~== ·\ /~ ADDRESS t,{A-t!:::' /,.. ~ /~ ~Wk:) CI1Y 7t~~~b STATEj, ZIP CODE it-i..-f DAY TELEPHONE V s. PROPEK /4?U,, ~TA1'e:-_,;,f~ NAME (last name firstJ · _ \ ....., STATE ZIP CODE NAME (iast name first) /¼U., ~~ AD_DRESS 7J~&? W4'IN~ CI1Y~ J:}/lf.4CJ ST-ATE~ ZIPCODE1'2,lf/ DAYTELEPHONE 24(2-., '5"5""~ STATE IJC. # LlCENSE CLASS ZWCODE CI1Y Bl)SINESS LlC. # _. ~~:.:/o IA/$/C :te,1/t/Y.) • DAY TELEPHONE $""'~ L/Z Workers' Compensation beclarauon: -1 hereby athrm that I hi1ve a certihcate·of conseqt to self-msure issued bY the Director of lndustnal Relations, or a certific~te of Workers' Compensation Insurance by.an admitted insurer, or an exaft copy or duplicate thereof certified by the Director·of the insure~ th~reof filed with the Building Inspection Department (Section 3800, Lab. C). · -. ' INSURANCE COMPANY POIJCY NO. EXP,IRATION DATE eeruhcate of Exemption: I-certify th;!t m the performance of the work tor which this permit 1s ·1ssued, r shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Worl~I?rs' Compensation Laws of California. . . --... SIGNATURE DATE A. oWNElt-BOllDElt DECLARATloN Owner-Builder Declaration: l hereby afhrm that I am exempt from the ContractoPs license I.aw for the followmg reason: D I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the stru~turl!-is not intended or · offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's IJcense·Law does not apply to an owner of property who build; ~ D CJ or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such impro'l'ements are not intende¥ or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale.). . .._ I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044,'Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's license Law does not apply to an owner of property who bllilds or improves thereon; and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's license Law). I am exempt under Section _ Business and Professions Code for :this reason: ·-· (Sec. 7031.5 ~usin~ and Prcifessions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish, or repair any structure, prior· to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed-statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (Chapter 9,-commencing with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemptioµ. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars [$500]). SIGNATIJRE DATE CoMPLE1'E mts SECl10N FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL BDlLblNG PERMITS ONLY: ls the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a busJness plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? a~ aoo · Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality m_anagement district? a~ aoo · Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? 0 ~ D·NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES,-A FINAL CERTIFICA"rn OF OOCUPANCY ,MAY Nor BE $lJED .AFl'ERJULY 1, 1989 UNLFSS nm APPUCANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING nm REQUIREMENTS OF nm OFFICE OF EMERGENCY ~VICES AND 11IE AIR POIJ.UTION CDNTilOL DISTIUCT. 9. WNSffiOCIIDN trumtNG AGENCY I hereby afhrm that there 1s a construction lending agency for the performance of the wqrk for·wfoch this permit 1s 1SSued (Sec 3097(1J ClVI! CodeJ. LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS to. APPDCANI CER:11FICA:l10N I certify uiat l have read the apphcat101J and state that the af;iove mformauon 1s correct. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the City of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE ID SAVE INDEMNIFY AND KEEP~ TIIE ClTY OF CARlSBAD AGAINST AIJ. IJABIUIIF.S, JUDGMENTS, CDSTS AND EXPEN~ WIIlCH MAY IN ANY WAY ACX:RUE AGAINST SAID crIY IN CDNSEQUENCE OF nm GRANTING OF nns P~. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over S'O" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. E;,c:plratioll, Every permit issued by the Building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 365 days from the date pf such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or ab~ned.~~ti~~ ~rk is com.menced for a period of 180 days (Section 303(d) Uniform Builcl.ing£1~ APPIJCANT'S SIGNATURE~~~~ _ DATE:/&' 'L _.,,: File -Yfil.tuW: Applicant PINK: Fifiaike "= - -, 0 ~ J 00otoo 50 S E W E R P E R M I T 10/21/97 12:29 Page 1 of 1 J-0b Address: 2091 RUTHERFORD RD Permit Type: ·SEWER -OFFICE/WAREHOUSE Parcel No: 212-120-25-00 Description: 108,863 SF SHELL TILT-UP BLDG : LOT 51,PC 961914 ' Suite: Pertnitee: MARSCH, RICHARD 619 5-46.-1121 _6640 LUSK BLVD STE 205 C SAN DIEGO CA 92121 CITY OF CARLSBAD . Permit No: SE960131 B.ldg Plc;mCk#: CB962035 0~95 10/21/97 0001 01 02 . C-PRMT · 58540 .. 00 Status: ISSUED Applied: 10/~9/9~ Apr/Issue: 10/21/97 Expired: Prepared By: MAM 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA92009 (619) 438-H6l-: Inspection List Permit#: CB962035 Type: INDUST Date Inspection Item Inspector .Act 4/20/2000 89 Final Combo 4/20/2000 89 Final Combo 3/20/2000 89 Final Combo 3/17/2000 89 Final Combo 2/16/2000 89 Final Combo g/16/1999 89 Final Combo 9/15/1999 89 Final Combo 9/24/19~8 89 Final Combo 8/13/1998 39 Final Electrical 7/31/1998 29 Final Plumbing 7/31/1998· 39 Final Electrical 7/30/1998 29 Final Plumbing 7/30/1998 39 Final Electrical 7/29/1998 24 Rough/Topout 7/29/1998 34 Rough Electric 7/20/1998 34 Rough Electric 7/17/1998 39 Final Electrical 7/1!;i/1998 17 Interior Lath/Drywall 7/14/1998 17 Interior Lath/Drywall 7/14/1998 34 Rough Electric 7/13/1998 17 Interior Lath/Drywall 7/10/1998 17 Interior Lath/Drywall PS AP 7/9/1998 17 Interior Lath/Drywall 7/9/1998 22 Sewer/Water Service 7/7/1998 16 Insulation 7/7/1998 22 Sewer/Water Service 7/6/199~ 16 Insulation 7/2/1998 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 1/1/1998 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 7/1/1998 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 771/1998 34 Rough Electric 6/30/1998 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 6/30/1998 24 Rough/Topout PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS DH DH DH DH DH DH 6/30/1998 31 Underground/Conduit-Wirin DH 6/29/1998 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers DH 6/29/1998 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 6/29/1998 34 Rough Electric DH DH RI co NS CA . co co GO co NS NS co co CA CA NR CA NR AP AP CA AP WC AP WC NR NR NR AP AP WC AP AP AP AP AP AP 6/25/1998 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PS NR 6/25/1998 31 Underground/Conduit-Wirin PS NR 6/24/1998 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin PS NR 6/24/1998 24 Rough/Topout PS 6/24/1998 31 Underground/Conduit-Wirin PS 6/23/1998 24 Rough/Topout PS 6/22/1998 11 Ftg/Found;:;ition/Piers PS Friday, April 2:1, 2000 NR NR AP NS 108,863 SF SHELL TILT-UP BLDG LOT 51,PC 961914 Comments SEE ATTACHED NOTICE ROLL FOR MONDAY 3/20/2000 NEEDS TO REMOVE STORAGE BY KEN TAYLOR NO ONE ON SITE & LOCKED OK TO RELEASE HOUSE METE EXT CEILING COMPLETE ENTRY EXT CEILING REVISED GRADE BEAM AT LI REVISED GRD BEAM AT LINE 3 LIGHT POLE FTGS & ELEC ROOF DRAINS BACK & BLD FOOTINGS LIGHT POLES-11 OUT OF 14 LIGHT POLES-11 OUT OF 14 ROOF DRAINS FRONT Page 1 of 3 6/17/1998 15 Roof/Reroof PS co NO S.I. REPORT · 6/15/1998 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin PS CA 6/12/1998 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PS CA BY JIM AT SITE 6/12/1998 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin PS CA BY JIMAT SITE 6/12/1998 15 Roof/Reroof PS CA BY JIM AT SITE 6/11/1998 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PS AP TRASH ENCLOSER SLAB 6/11/1998 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin PS AP CRICKETS ON ROOF 6/10/1998 11 Ftg/Foundatiqn/Piers PS AP REAR STAIRS 6/9/1998 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PS AP COLMS COMPLETE 6/9/1998 15 Roof /Re roof PS AP COMPLETE 6/8/1998 15 Roof/Reroof PS NS 6/5/1998 15 Roof/Reroof PS WC 6/5/1998 17 Interior Lath/Drywall PS AP 6/4/1998 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PS co 6/4/1998 17 Interior Lath/Drywall PS AP 6/2/1998 15 Roof/Reroof PS AP REAR 1/2 OF BUILDING 6/2/1998 31 Underground/Conduit-Wirin PS CA 6/1/1998 15 Roof/Reroof PS NR 6/1/1998 31 Underground/Conduit-Wirin PS AP FRONT SOUTH & 1/2 REAR E 6/1/1998 34 Rough Electric PS WC 5/29/1998 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin PS AP METAL FRAME ELEC RM 5/29/1998 66 Grout PS AP 28 COLUMN 5/28/1998 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PS AP STAIRS & TRASH 5/27/1998 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PS NR 5/26/1998 66 Grout PS NR 5/21/1998 12 Steel/Bond Beam PS AP POUR STRIPS 5/21/1998 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin PS WC 5/20/1998 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers TP AP P.S.@7 LN A-K 5/20/1998 12 Steel/Bond Beam TP AP ELECT RM SLAB 5/7/1998 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PS NR 5/6/1998 11 Ftg/Foundation/Pier~ PS AP COLM ABOVE GROUND 5/5/1998 11 Ftg/FoundationiPiers PS co 5/4/1998 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PS co 4/24/1998 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PS AP SCREEN & RAMP PAD FOOTIN 4/23/1998 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PS CA BY SUPER JIM 4/21/1998 12 Steel/Bond Beam PS AP PANELS 9,51,50 4/20/1998 13 Shear·Panels/HD's PS co 4/17/1998 12 Steel/Bond Beam PS AP 10-20 R-4,5 4/16/1998 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PS WC 4/16/1998 12 Steel/Bond Beam PS AP PANELS S-1-6, R-1,2 TRAS 4/14/1998 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PS AP FRONT SLAB 4/14/1998 13 Shear Panels/HD's PS AP PANELS #7, & #8 4/13/1998 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PS CA 4/13/1998 12 Steel/Bond Beam PS CA 4/10/1998 12 Steel/Bond Beam PS AP FRONi FTG HILITE BLUE 4/9/1998 12 Steel/Bond Beam PS AP PANELS 1-6 & 46-49 10 TO 4/7/1998 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PS AP PANELS 21-27, & 32-38 3/27/1998 12 Steel/Bond Beam PS CA 3/25/1998 12 Steel/Bond Beam PS AP PANELS 28-31,36,39-45 3/24/1998 12 Steel/Bond Beam PS co 3/20/1998 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PS AP HILITED BLUE Friday, April 21, 2000 Page 2 of 3 3/5/1998 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PS CA DONE ON WED 3/4/1998 11 Ftg/foundation/Piers PS AP 3/3/1998 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PS AP HILITED PINK 3/2/1998 j 1 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PS NR 2/3/1998 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PS CA RAIN 2/2/1998 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PS AP SLAB A-K S.5 GRID 1/30/1998 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PS CA 1/29/1998 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PS AP SLAB A-K GRID 1/29/1998' 12 Steel/Bond Beam PS WC 1/29/1998 21 Underground/Under Floor PS WC 1/29/1998 22 Sewer/Water Service PS AP 1/29/1998 31 Underground/Conduit-Wirin PS AP 1/28/1998 81 Underground Combo PS AP 1/27/1998 22 Sewer/Water Service PS AP SEWER 1/22/1998 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PS AP COLUMN FOOTN HILITED IN 1/9/1998 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PS CA RAIN 1/8/1998 21 Underground/Under Floor TP AP Friday, April 21, 2000 Page 3 of 3 . ' 10/Zl/2003 oi:3~ 11;\X __ ·-. ,., ., ,.. @OIJ2 . '/ • .i,,. / ·!:.-:f.._.,-n,, I , Cit)' of Carlsbad---tJ ~ 3 3£::._ til!i hrad;w -~, C'dldslrad C-.:aiiiomia i>lOOB tNSPECTlON RECORD. INSf'ECTION RECORD CARO WITH APPROVED PLANS .MUS:r BE k~d Orii'Th"f JOB CAU P.R10.R TO :MO P.M. FOR NEXT WORK DAY INSPECTION BURDtNCi lNSPECHON; {76f» 002-2725 · JOB ADDRESS: ___ _ . .,,-----· ____ l.OTNO.ISUffi: _____ _ OWI-IERS NAME: __ ; Cl3030!H4 ~09i RUTHERFORtl l'tO CBAO 1 B!O HYliRATiON 7,257 SF SHE m@C@A-NC\' . SHELL TO OFFICE. -. --------': Tl COMM· _.a~U_llDI ___ N_G _____ 1 1~ SUZJE. ~~ OTHER APPROVED TO COVER Tw,,of~ .flaw l ln$fW:htT 7/Z.r' Notet . 'iUIU:,/NC . r-7..i:-L',t:;,D /.P ~J;ff .A,,,,._ ·J"~/. • ·fO!:!M.OA!K.lt-1 ·. Rl:INFORCl;D STEEL M"'50NRY D•-=~, D Wflll DRhlNS -'?-,_ . .'ANElS. PO\JR STRIPS -·-CO!.UMNfOOTINGS 5USF~ 01'1:0CR· !'.J·c,E!t!NO .ROOr .Sl:\EATl:llNG' ~ EXT, SHUI.R l'/\NEtS ~ ,,,,,_,... ..l'Yh .r~ Pr,'?1~ Ji!!#-. ?it/" FRAME,-.,.~ F...!!..P;'Q(wJN_L_ ~h/./ir.J --I 1NWL'\'m:.N EX.tffilOR l.ATI-l .. INTERIOR tATH & DRYW/\Ll -~ ~ 4t''/~'t ] • M/A.,c.,f..... f,r;t., x:';..d , -J'JNAI. • < , I 0.W,~ .f°*...., ~~ _,,~ .., '7/L•j' l'!flw.,.IWO ---Cl SEWCR ANO Bl/CO OPl/CO I'-..,_ ..... , -UNOERGROUNO Cl WASTE -lJWAT"..R. :"rAu/1,5 ~ --!Ail-.v ..,..,.,..,.__a,..,,v,.-; -~M_,,..~ TQl>OOT Ci WliSiE OWATER' ,,,, A'.rh;·t l;L.f .;,. . u/..L. ../?..,.,..,,,..,,~~ -,., , . , 'fllR AND SOOWER PAN ,,, . v,4:: . .t.....u/ ~.n4. :rl,ur -OGAS TEST OGAS PIPING ' ~..2JI =,-r' ,-;,;., 'n, 0 WATI:l': l-leA.TEit OSOVIRWJ.ll:R f I fiNAl . - l:UCTRJCAL t:;J a.ECTRIC UNOER.GROIJNO DUFER I<' .H ao:;lR!CWMIS /-/.d ./4 !JI ~ -~ ... £H·a1 ~crr..1c t:Et!Nt.5 ,,...,......_.., r,;,I -·,,.1,. ,.P .. Cl fl.£9RlC SER.VICE 0 TEMPORARY· .I" fv.4' pµt,J _.,.,,, • o I ,LJ'1't" /.J ~ L fll'IM UNDERGROUND DUCTS & Pll'lNG a DUCT& l'l.™.o REF, Pli'IN(; FINAL -8ulf,lill!l D,,pL {Inspections) t7n0l &12-:ms g.4..;,,,.,_ ".h·~ -fi1'3 OQl;l,\ltment ,{760)~ fl f,,;.i e, '5. ~--?:iif"..-Jng~~ (760j·!!l¾700-· . J. ' lo' ' .£r,gl~ag.Dept.. J.lnspection,;l (760) 438-38!)1 llullding lnspee!O(S (7~} {iti9) 682-2100 O\IIWU (ioiii .at,j.6..2722' i:~t T(s:f . Permit#: Project Name: Address: CilY of Carlsbad 108,863 SF SHELL TILT-UP BLDG LOT 51,PC 961914 2091 RUTHERFORD RD Contact Person: MARK Phone: 61992j4076 Sewer Dist: CA Water Dist: CA Date: 2/16/2000 Permit Type: INDUST Sub Type: Lot: 51 ........................................................................................................................................................... Inspected Date By:. lnspeeted: Approved: Disapproved: __ Inspected Date By: Inspected: Approved: Disap·proved: __ Inspected Date By: Inspected: . Approved: Disapproved: __ ··························································································································································· Comments: ------------------------------- / - FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION DE.PT: BUILDING ENGINEERING F;IRE PLANNING CMWD ST LITE PLAN CHECK#: CB962035 PERMIT#: CB962035 PROJECT NAJ-IE: 108,863 ·SF SHELL TILT-UP BLDG LOT 51,PC 961914 ADDRESS: 2091 RUTHERFORD RD CONTACT PERSON/PHONE#: C/JIM/619/708-2039 SEWER DIST:· CA WATER D!ST: CA DATE Lot# 51 DATE: 08/17/98 PERMIT TYPE: INDUST ;,\ \'0 \ S , .- ~~~PECTED/4'A~;l INSPECTED: B•ZC,,,<i,,S APPROVED x_ DISAPPROVED INSPECTED BY: INSPECTED BY: COMMENTS: DATE INSPECTED: DATE .INSPECTED: APPROVED DISAPPROVED APPROVED DISAPPROVED CIIY Of Carlsbad . · Final Building Inspection J ~--~ ' l ., l• .. 1·,1n . ,·it\ 2 1 ~- Dept: ijuilding l;nginee~g Planning CMWD St Lite Fire Plan Check#: Permit#: Project Name: Address: Contact Person: · Sewer Dist: Inspected By: Inspected · By: CB962035 108,863 SF SHELL TILT-UP BLDG LOT 51,PC 961914 2091 RUTHERFORD RD MARK WALFORD Phone: 6199214076 A Water Dist: CA Lot: Date: 3/20/2000 Permit Type: IN DUST Sub Type: 51 .............................................................................................................. Date / Disapproved: __ Inspected: 3. · ;2 /. ()() Approved: Date Inspected: . Approved: Disapproved: __ Date Inspected: Approved: Disapproved: __ ••••..•••.•••.•• -••••••••••••••••••••••••••• ,i •••••••••••••••••.•••••••.••• i,,, .•.•......•.•.••.•........•.•...••..•••.......•..•.••••.•...........••••.••.. Comments: __ ___,_-_____________________ ....;._ _____ _ ' CIIYOI Carlsbad · Final Building Inspection Dept: Building Engineering Planning ,CMWD St Lite Fire PlanCheck#: Permit#: Project Name: Address: CB962035 108,863 SF SHELL TILT-UP BLDG LOT 5~,PC 961914 2091 RUTHERFORD RD Contact Person: MARK WALFORD Phone: 6199214076 Sewer Dist: CA Water Dist: CA Inspected Date By: Inspected: Inspected Date By: Inspected: Date: Permit Type: Sub Type: Lot: 51 Approved: Approved: 3/20/2000 INDUST Disapproved: __ Disapproved: __ ........................................................................................................................................................... Comments: _______ __,,. ______________________ _ FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION DEPT: BUILDING ENGINEERING FIRE ,:e:GANN:lNti, CMWD ST LITE PLAN CIJECK#: CB962'035 PERMIT#: CB962035 PROJECT NAME: 108,863 SF SHELL TILT-UP BLDG LOT 51,PC 961914 ADDRESS: 2091 .RUTHERFORD RD CONTACT PERSON/PHONE#: C/JIM/619/708-2039 SEWER DIST: CA WATER DIST: CA , ~~~PECTED . \~ · INSPECTED BY: INSPECTED BY: COMMENTS: DATE INSPECTED: DATE INSPECTED: DATE INSPECTED: Lot# 51 APPROVED APPROVED DATE: 08/17/98 PERMIT TYPE: INDUST DISAPPROVED DISAPPROVED FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION DEPT: BUILDING ENGINEERING EI.RE PLANNING CMWD ST LITE PLAN CHECK#: CB962035 PERMIT#: CB962·035 PROJECT NAME: 108, 8·63 SF SHELL TILT-UP BLDG LOT 51,PC 961914 ADDRESS: 2091 RUTHERFORD RD CONTACT PERSON/PHONE#: C/JI,-i/619/708-2039 SEWER DIST: CA WATER DIST: CA INSPECTED BY: (:\ ,~ INSPECTED BY: INSPECTED BY: COMMENTS: DATE INSPECTED: DATE INSPECTED: DATE INSPECTED: Lot# APPROVED APPROVED APPROVED DATE: 08/17/98 PERMIT TYPE: INDUST DISAPPROVED DISAPPROVED -, ·,(! TESTING ENGINEERS SAN DIEGO (619)-715-5800 FAX (619) 715-5810 ATLANTIC CITY• RAfN/AY • FT. LAUDERDALE• ORLANDO• SAN DIEGO REPORT OF COMPRESSION TEST PROJECT LOT 51 CARLS!3AD RESEARCH CEl'JTER PROJECT NO. 97-306 ----------- PROJECT ADDRESS 2091 RUTHERFORD ROAD CARLSBAD CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR KOLL CONSTRUCTION ---------------------------- ARCHITECT/ ENGINEER WARE & MALCOMB ARCHITECTS/ODAY CONSULTANTS BLDG. PERMIT NO. 96-2035 PLAN FILE NO. NIA SAMPLE DATA . REPORT OF - II] CONCRETE D MORTAR D GROUT D HS GROUT D PRISMSD OTHER PLACEMENT DATE 6/5/98 DATE RECEIVED IN LAB 6/5/98 SUPPLIER _ NORTH COUNTY MIX DESIGN PSI 3000 ------------,..------------------ MIX NUMBER -3033000 MIX DESCRIPTION 5.25 SK TYPE OF CEMENT NIA TICKET NO. 246072 • ••••i I • _ • ADMIXTURE . NIA SLUMP 7 MIXING TIME ~· -,:.;.-·• ...... ,:· ... :t .. ,,,'·" 'I.'••,•· ..... 40 MIN --.. ·-·" ··· . l;'ERC5NT.:AIR ...... ·_ :·~:· ·. NIA --:--------.,..,.,......,--,,,------ CONCRETE .TEMP. · . at··.·· -... ·, :.·· .. --------AIR-TEMP. --. .. . . 70 -~---'------'--"-~------ DES I G N STRENGTH (f;c) PSI .LJQ()O __ @ 28 DA°'!1S SAMPLES·MADE BY __ H_._S_A_R_KA_N_I ______ _ LOCATION OF PLACEMENT 51/2 SOG WEST OF LINE 7 AT LOADING DOCK BET APPROX LINES E.6 & E.9 & BET 15 FT TO 35 FT LINES WEST OF LINE 7. LABORATORY DATA FIELD DIMENSIONS TEST AREA (sq. MAXIMUM LOAD COMPRESSIVE IDENTITY LAB NO. DA TE TESTED (inches) inches) (lbs) STRENGTH (psi) 7 146 6/12/98 6 X 12 28.27 -72,000 2550 28 147 7/3/98 6x 12 28.27 93,500 3310 28' 148' 7/3/98 6x 1~ . 28.27 93,500 3310 -· 149 -. --- 7/31/9:8 .. --1-0l. 000 .. LJs-10 J --. . ----------------.. ··--- :·: · /, .. _: : ;~~L SAMPLING·AND·TESTING-PERF.'.ORMED lf'l_,Gl;!'!l;~L_ACCORDANCEWITH A'STM TEST METHODS. *ACTUAL MEASURED AREA.- '-REMARKS: TWO 28 DAY TE:ST DOE$ NOT COMP_L y W!~~;PROJECT $;-~~;l¢ATIONS DISTRIBUTION: OWNER, ARCHITECT, ENGINEER, CONTRA9TQR, CITY, SUP.PLIER_ ~ -CHECKED BY: REVIEWE'D BY: LARRY CLARK, RCE 26151, GE 219 PATE: ------DATE: ------- TESTING ENGINEERS SAN DIEGO (619)-715-5800 .FAX (619) 715-5810 ATLANTIC CITY• RAfiWAY • FT. LAUDERDALE• ORLANDO• SAN DIEGO REPORT OF COMPRESSION TEST PROJECT LOT 51 CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER PROJECT NO. 97-306 ----------- . PROJECTADDRESS 2091 RUTHERFORD ROAD CARLSBAD CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR KOLL CONSTRUCTION ---------------------------- ARCHITECT/ ENGINEER WARE & MALCOMB ARCHITECTS/ODAY CONSULTANTS BLDG. PERMIT NO. 96-2035 PLAN FILE NO. N/A SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF I[] CONCRETE D MORTAR D GROUT D HS GROUT D PRISMSD OTHER PLACEMENT DATE 6/5/98 DATE RECEIVED IN LAB 6/5/98 ---------- SUPPLIER NORTH COUNTY MIX DESIGN PSI 3000 -----.,--------.,---------------- MIX NUMBER 3033000 MIX DESCRIPTION 5.25 SK TYPE OF CEMENT N/A TICKET NO. 246165 APMIXTURE N/A SLUMP 6 MIXING TIME 55 MIN PERCENT AIR N/A CONCRETE TEMP. 68 AIR TEMP. 58 -------------- DESIGN STRENGTH (f '0) PSI ~@ ij_j;~];YS SAMPLES MADE BY H. SARKANI ------------- LOCATION OF PLACEMENT 5 1/2 S.O.G. WEST OF LINE 7 AT LOADING DOCK BET APPRX LINES A.2 & A.8 BET LINE 7 & 20 FT LINE WEST OF LINE 7 .. LABORATORY DATA FIELD DIMENSIONS TEST AREA (sq. MAXiMUM LOAD COMPRESSIVE IDENTITY LAB NO. DATE TESTED (inches) inches) (lbs) STRENGTH (psi) 7 154 6/12/98 6x 12 28.27 71,500 2530 28 155 7./3/98 6x 12 28.27 ~5,000 3360 28 156 7/3/98 6x 12 28.27 99,500 3520 56. 157 ··7/31/98 . 6xl2 28.27 103,500 C 3'6'60 =._) · ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM TEST METHODS. *ACTUAL MEASURED AREA. REMARKS: two 28 DAY TEST DOES NOT COMPLY WITH PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. DISTRIBUTION: OWNER, ARCHITECT, t=:NGINEER, CQNTRAQTQ~. CITY, SUPPLIER . ~ CHECKED BY: REVIEWED BY: LARRY CLARK, RCE 26151, GE 219 DATE: DATE: ------- ' ' ~ -. TESTING ENGINEERS SAN DIEGO (619)-715-5800 · FAX (619) 715-5810 REPORT OF COMPRESSION· TEST ATLANTIC CITY* FWfWAY * FT. LAUDERDALE* ORLANDO* SAN DIEGO PROJECT LOT 51 CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER PROJECT NO. 97-306 ----------- PROJECT ADDRESS CONTRACTOR 20. 91 RUTHERFQRO ROAD CARLSBAD CALIFORNIA KOLL CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT/ ENGINEER WARE & MALCOMB ARCHITECTS/ODAY CONSULTANTS BLDG. PERMIT NO. 96:-2035 PLAN FILE NO. N/A · ----------- SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF l2LI CONCRETE D MORTAR D GROUT D Hs GROUT D PRISMsO OTHER ~LACEMENT DATE 6/5/98 DATE RECEIVED IN LAB 6/5/98 SUPPLIER NORTH COUNTY MIX DESIGN PSI 3000 ------------- MIX NUMBER 3033000 , MIX DESCRIPTION 5.25 SK TYPE OF CEMENT NIA TICKET NO. 246122 -~--------- ~M~U~ NM SLUMP· 7 MIXING TIME 49 MIN PERCENT AIR NIA CONCRETE TEMP. 68 AIR TEMP. 77 ----,=.f :::=::::::==::::. ::::::::::::::==:::-.,_ DESIGN STRENGTH (f '0) PSI '-:4.0.0QJ~ .2B-~AYS_;SAMPLES MADE BY __ H_._S_A_R_KA_N_I _______ _ LOCATION OF PLACEMENT 5 1/2 SOG WEST OF LINE 7 AT LOADING DOCK BETWEEN APPROX LINE C.1 & C.5 & BET 15 FT TO 35 FT LINES WEST OF LINE 7. LABORATORY DATA FIELD DIMENSIONS. TEST AREA (sq. MAXIMUM LOAD COMPRESSIVE IDENTITY LAB NO. DATE TESTED (inches) inches) (lbs) STRENGTH (psi) . 7 150 6/12/98 6x 12 28.27 80,000 2830 28 151 7/3/98 6x 12 28.27 96,500 3410 28 152 7/3/98 6x 12 28.27 97,000 3430 s·6 153 7/31/98 6xl2 28.27 '107,500 !'.liill.0_ J ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING PERFORMEr;> IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM TEST METHODS. *ACTUAL MEASURED AREA. REMARKS: TWO 28 DAY TEST DOES NOT COMPLY WITH PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. 'DISTRIBUTION: OWNER, ARCHITECT, ENGINEER, CONTRACTQ~. CITY, SUPPLIER ~ CHECKED BY: REVIEWED BY: LARRY CLARK, RCE 26151, GE 219 DATE: DATE: -------, ~~)7 /k~,i.lVCll! , c · if. ·c: ·--l h d 4/ /tf', IM,I~_., zt-u O ari s a, /(,,,6;;!,/.. (.--~-l<"'~ I" s ,, J £/';f.-3/..,sJ!!i-7't$2:..:::J'""'@>~.,,) 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad California 92009 .;,--7tf'JJ "'c~~~~'f)kt) INSPECTION RECORD r. &o/-&J;~&l.?1 INSPECTION RECORD CARD WITH APPROVED PLANS MUST BE KEPT ON THE JOB CALL PRIOR TO 2:00 P.M. FOR NEXT WORKDAY INSPECTION BUILDING INSPECTION: 1760) 4~8-3101 !OB ADDRESS: __ L~_;;O:-C-y......._l ___ ~.,__'-'_~~, ._,~----'-r-"~-~-~-~-(L __ C:::. __ · _____ LOT NO./SUITE: _____ _ OWNERS NAME: ______ --..---'--_________________________ ~-- USE/OCCUPANCY ID e C ¢ ~ "l..c_J/ TYPE CONST. DATE lu/ Lt( Y) 1 PERMIT NO. CONTRACTOR BUILDING OTHER APPROVED TO COVER Typeof Inspection Date Inspector Notes BUILDING FOUNDATION REINFORCED STEEL MASONRY D WALL DRAINS POUR STRIPS COLUMN FOOTINGS SUBFRAME D FLOOR D CEILING ROOF SHEATHING EXT. SHEAR PANELS FRAME INSULATION . EXTERIOR LATH INTERIOR LATH & DRYWALL FINAL PLUMBING ti!I-SEWER AND BUCO ljlPUCO .'1.,. BiL, · UNDERGROUND D WASTE D WATER TOP OUT tJ WASTE D WATER TUB AND SHbWER PAN GAS TEST GAS PIPING D WATER HEATER D SOLAR WATER FINAL ELECTRICAL D ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND ~UFER ROUGH ELECTRIC WALLS ROUGH ELECTRIC CEILING , D ELECTRIC SERVICE D TEMPORARY D BONDING D POOL FINAL MECHANICAL . - KLT ENGINEERS 7~04311825 ,., .. I ._,.,"' f ,.,. 11,pt~ '"MiC!l UN .. CZ t(. G, $\IIIJlc:f 949 :263 1310 KOLL CCNSTRUCiION 1' \,. :u,~ i ~ 1 e _____ OA~Ci.lY P.03 ~1$T --~-Oft --- JOI -!'.f (,,a9¼ ·-· .,, r,Nfll!, i..i e:rcxy €,~r (I. ~41/ d.C, CEf· ,N~rs.cr,o"' . ,'S · '"'f---~q....._-1--.L.. Nor (lliGlUlfl.Gf;)) .. . . ~~p~ ~ . . ,;' ,-...--"-:1~-+---..L.--.J " .. J .•• . --·--· -,.-.-,...,.--------------··- . -· ___ , __ ... _ ... -·-· \· International . i conference ~ autldlnl Official$ l llON I CALKINS I CIR'fdllD SPIICIAL -... -IC ... CT"T:,CJR . . STIUCTUPL sna AND waDINC \ 11M·8MTION • UMFOIIII IUILDING CON · The indiVl<tual named hereon is CERTIFIED irt the category l shown, having t>een ·so certified pursuant t~ sue:cessful . \ completiOn of the prescribed written examination. 1 jExPtratiOn date.--~~~ \ ! NO. 75125 NOt valid un~lcate holder.'. '. /CBO certification attests to competem know~°! c~s ~standards.\ i.. -~!C~!~i~~!~!,~ ~-~~~-~--~a.!!~,~~!· -~--_____ ___J .. . .. .. . . ~, .ur.1. CALIFORNIA~~=· :··.. · RIVER LICENSE·· · cl;Jl·ss:c \E_X __ p; IRES 06 • 0.. 0/l Tli:s,1/cense is ,ss~_td as a uc to drive .a 0 moti-~e~:c~~ :t , .. does not establish elig1b1Hty for empJoymt-nt voter re-s1strat10n. or publlt: ber,:ttc RON -ALKINS t' • ' 05/ FD/Ol !~_ou_) ·.. .. . . AMERICAN CONCRh'1.'f. i:~ ;:;-; •; · ,r,·:;, .. ----"'i ..... ----- 'l'his,is to certify.-~hat RON C"'JJKH'lfS 5527Sih;,,4i has demonstrated knowledge and ability by succesEfully completing the ACI certification requirements f t~ter'national. and is hereby recognized as an ACI CONCRETE FIELD TESTING TEC~l'~ll(;:IAs~-:-.GR,4.DE I ~h.-r-;rniHi!t: 1) .. AJ:.~"S Daic; AJ<11l 8, 1_7)5 I:fa_pires: Apt Zi 2C~lf! . =----· ' : Conference of Building Officials RONS CALKINS . CERTIFIED-SPECIAL INSPECTOR REINFORCED CONCRETE 19!M Editions -UBC & ASTM Standards I I I The Individual named hereon is CERTIFIED in the category shown, i having been so certified pursuant to successful completion of th~ prescribed written examination. 1 ExPiratlon date:~ ~2°7~ 1f( ! No. ·71751 . ... ~. , Not va™s siorP by certificate holder. I ICfiO certification attests to competent knowledge of codes and standards. / ~~~~f~·ex~~i~~ !!1®~d f?e ver!~ by_}(!Ca! [uris~~~!_-___ ... _ _ ___ J ,. - International Conference of Building Officials RON S CALKINS CERTIFIED SPECIAL INSPECTOR PRESTRESSED CONCRETE ! 1994 EDITIONS -UBC & ASTM STANDARDS : The individual named hereon is CERTIFIED in the category '. shown, having been so certified pursuant to successful completion of the prescribed written examination. Expiration date: January 14, 1998_ -. .,,. i No. 79275 ,-; : " , -' ,,,, .. ,·· . . : Not valid unless signed 6v certificate holder. ; ICBO certification atteat& to competent know/t:clge of code& and I &tandards. Applicable experience should be verifit:cl by local i__[u_dsdiction_s. _ _ _ _ _ ' r -.. __ ,,,...,.. ___ -. .. .. . ~ . .ln~~rnillliP.0.~r Q,gnf~r:enc~ -,~a.u.r iii$ . es1~f1lbife~::t.~1~ 19.Mil;ldltions -l:i$C & AfTM · . llilards -TQe in.Q.tYi~Ucil name.«1her®n iS Cl;R-TIJ;l~EHn t~e categpr.yshaWn, o~v.ii'lfJt¢~n·$P ~ertifleo, _Jl~\Jint to,successtul comi,~tlon of the . _ 1 1 ' .t!res~~P.~\'! Yaitt¢n ~ ~ ' h. ' -~~il'ation date: Jilne. 11 - ~<>-11i01P --~~~~~~~~~--1 l . I I I ...,_,,,__.,.._....,., __ ~··-..... _.,... __ .. --·.-···~-,..~ ............ ,-..... ~:"!.-•t •• .,.. •• ' ' -~ -,.;. ' •• .-:J I • , • . ~ ' •• ''i I lnternationil,I Canf.e~nce-of BuilcJirJg Qffit.ia1$ Fl;l:_iPe 'Nl~L TRAN CERTIF-leP $1?'5'~1AL, IN$fi!ijGTOR ~TRUeJVJ3A~~Q~Y 1994 EDllTfON -UNIF-QR .. $Uil.DING OOQE The indiVidual nameqt·h.ereon isOER:t:lfilED in the category shown, · havin!i} b_e_en·so certifie!'.f-·pursy;mt to successful completion of the : prescribed writt1m e~~in~_tiQ[I. , Expiration.date: octo ·· ·· -·· No. 75513· . ". • -ss si§1@(t by tettif ca e ho1aer. ICBO c;ertili~ation atte?ts to competent knowtedge of codes·arid<standards. · Applicable experience should be verified by Iota/ jurisdictions. :_ 1 .. i • .. POOR QUALITY ORIGINAL S l \ -...__ ___ . , .... __ .. -, . '! ... ,. ... ~M'-.. ~~ . ;{ I I J , . ., .. ,, ..... _.,., . f · 'I I I, r '•4'",),w l . Jt:ll~certitiJation . I -~~p,Uc°ab1e eJIP.fCiencesliou(cl be-, .. , , . ~~"t::?;y.~fij1~p<~-.tr -~,_.,,.,, ---~---~~~-~-::~.---- '. _: ·-----~\ AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE This ~ to certify that ROCIU,AND DALE 558849354 has demonstrated.knowledge and ability by succ~fully' completing the ic1certification requirements 1.md is hereby recognized as an. A.CI CONCRET~ F1ELD T~TING t; TECHNICIAN -GRADE I E-mminer. C. Sundquist Date: June 3, 199.5 Junc2000 .•• ,c f ( r ' ,,..~-:;_fl ( ) 2/)f I /lt11~LJr,fMJJ .~· . :• ·rv· shQ.>,Nt{ 1 ~too,a:f .i:lie Wyman Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 FIELD WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING 0 SHOTCRETE REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 H. S. BOLTING D NOT 0 OTHER INSPECTOR OF 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 SHOP WELDING 0 D/B ANCHORAGE ~~EiffD~~therford Rd. N9-7-306 I FOR WEEK ENDING J: an • 30 ~8 i7~ER5f :R9ffa_~:,1!= # 2 ~.:. ,~wo, . I PLAN FILE NO. .c&fBt~'.¥cIBgG~eYP ~acf~Ec~ Malcomb · DESIGN STRENGTH !SOURCE OR MFGR. ffi'IEER .DESCRIBE MATt (MIX.DESIGN, RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR,) -fM'Y'Lf;o~'M'€~ction ~STM A.615 grade 60 CONTR. DOING REPORTED WORK ~an Testing Laboratories .t<l:!i l..N.t J~"-,..!.!.'l\.:r S'l'.tS.tSL .b.N~PECTION tJ..,-29-98 Inspected the reinforcing steel for S.O.G. between line 6 to 7 by A to K per ~etail 1/SD2, 3/SDl and note on S.4. [nspected reinforcing steel for size, grade, lap, loca:.tfons. Note: the smooth dowels at the construction joint were installed (rpt. dated tl.-28..,.98). t!LS 2-2-98 Signed copy on file. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. Daniel Wyman SIGNATURE OF REGISTEl~ED INSPECTOR DATE OF REPORT REGISTER NUMBER Wyman Testing Laboratories .. (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 FIELD WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING 0 SHOTCRETE REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 H. S. BOLTING 0 NDT 0 OTHER INSPECTOR OF 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 SHOP WELDING 0 D/B ANCHORAGE ~ijfg6fD~~therford Rd. N9-7-306 I FOR WEEK ENDING Jan. 30 9,8 ~~E~ ~R93:fli'<J'~E :ff:2 eg~~,~1?<?· I PLAN FILE NO. .C&fJif}: ~±1°0 fflg G~ee1'f) ~:t'l?'fct Malcomb DESIGN STRENGTH· I SOURCE OR MFGR. ~EER DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN, RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) :teo"t'f'L cS'TR~TOR • · ns ruction ASTM A615 grade 60 CONTR. DOING REPORTED WORK ~an Testing Laboratories ' . REI.N.J:!'U.t<CING STEEL INSPECTION tl-28-98 Inspected the reinforcing steel for. S.O.G. between line 6 to 7 by D to K per ~etail 1/SD2, 3/SDl and note on S-4. [nspected reinforcing steel for size, grade, lap, loca~fons and clearances. ~ote: the smooth dowel at the construction joint are not installed also the lnat is not d·obled up .. t::LS 2-2-98 Signed copy on file. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT !'HAVE INSPECTED -ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS, AND APP~ICABLE SECTIONS. Daniel Wyman SIGNATURE OF REGISfERED INSPECTOI? DATE OF REPORT i?EGISfER NUMBER Wyman Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 FIELD WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING 0 SHOTCRETE REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 H. S. BOLTING D NDT 0 OTHER INSPECTOR OF 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 SHOP WELDING 0 D/B ANCHORAGE ., ~WfD~ijtherford Rd. N($}.7-3Q6 I FOR WEEK 23 ~8 ENDING Jan . . . [?&'-f::ER~j PROJECT NAME §-8'2·6~~1T NO. I PLAN FILE NO. :5B~ft9~'elTYPE. GRADE, ETC.) ·ARCHITECT fer'~ !sTtmGI:Js r I so~l?~~WffHoan ENGINEER DESCRIBE MAT'!, (MIX DESIGN, RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) ft'efl~L~Pfiction Mix #G515, 2-SOO psi r.<;~~-D~tii>Ha~D WORK W:fman Testing Laboratories .. .. C'-'.!.'!'-~!!i-J.'ti ..1..Nb.l:' .15~'1' J.U.N 1-23-98 Inspected the placement and consolidation of 180 yards of concrete @ footings Ion lines M.3-6; L.3-6; K.3-6: J.3-6, G 3-6, F.3-6, E.3-6 and grade beam on H line. tt1ook detail from footing schedule on S4. Slump 4" _./ _.. ISet 1, truck #333, ticket #674779, @ G.B. H4 ISet 2, truck #336, ticket #674795 @ footing F4. ~11 steel inspected prior to pour and is in accordance with detail noted above. !work is in compliance with approved plans and specifications. : CLS 1-28-98 Signed copy on file. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. l,JNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. B.Alblinger SIGNATURE oF REGISIERED INSPECTOI~ DATE oF REPORT REGIS[ER NUMBER WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES REPORT OF COMPRESSION TEST 17150 Via Del Campo Suite 307 San Diego, CA 92127 1-800-487 -0355 PROJECT LOT 51 CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER PROJECT NO. 97-306 PROJECT ADDRESS 2091 RUTHERFORD ROAD, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR ----=K=O=L=L=---=C~O=N=S=T=R=U~C=T=I~O=N~----------,---------- ARCHITECT/ENGINEER ___,__W=A=R=E-=&~MA=L=C~O=M=B=---A=R=H-C=I=T=E=C~T~S-L~B~URK==E=T=T------"'&'-'-'W=O=N=G ______ _ BLDG. PERMIT NO. 962035 PLAN FILE NO. N/A SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF: . ~ CONCRETE D MORTAR D GROUT D PRISMS DH/ s GROUT D OTHER PLACEMENT DATE ___ _,::::;0=1~-=2=3_---=-9...;::;8____ DATE RECEIVED IN LAB --=N~/=A,_ __ _ SUPPLIER --------~N=E=L=S=O=N'-'----'S=L=O=A=N"--_ MIX DESIGN PSI 2500 MIX. NUMaER ----~---5_1=5 ______ MIX DESCRIPTION ------=-~~/--=-A=----. TYPE_:O~ _CEMENT -~---,-.=I=I~-------·-.. TICKET NUMBER 674795 ADMIXTURE WRDA 64 SLQMP ---------'-• :~4""", --=1::..,,:/....a4::....'-' __ 1.:.;,· :.,-: , '_.!. • • ,;.· :·;;::; ~·I\~• .:~--.!i' f'11~.-t:!,~1-,. T,IME~-.;n{ ___ J-,:JJ<ER,:·_:_'.', __ :·._,:: __ :·--=4--=-:0--=M='r=Nc...;;:·: __ ... ...;.. .. :~..,..·-·-':·~ ...... ~--.,.,.'\;,;-...'_,-::·~.'...!?1~R-~:!?~.:~~~IR_.,;..~_--,;·;...,· _·.,..:..·-·......,....a~~--·--'-'-···---=-N:.,1.{...:.A:;.. ______________ _ CONC •.. TE_MJ> --,-----=N ..... /=A~----~-: ___ ?,._I.~ .';r'.~~;p ~ .. : --------=-N~/--=-A=--,.,..,.,...-~ UNIT WEIGHT WET ---=N ..... 1-=A~------UNIT WEIGHT DRY ___,..---,.--=N .... /=A~--- MD_{ REQUIRED PSl (f'c) 2500 PS.I @ 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY B. ALBLINGER LOCATION OF PLACEMENT ______ F=OO=T=I=N_G~F_4~------------------- FIELD LAB IDENTITY NO. 7 5 28 6 . 28 7 H 8 ~ ... . DATE TESTED 01-30-98 02-20-98 02-20-98 -LABORATORY DATA DIMENSIONS INCHES 6 X 12 6 X 12 . 6 X 12 TEST AREA SQ. INCHES 28.27 28.27 28.27 .. .. ·-· .. ... . .. --.. . ' ALL SAMPLING AND. TESTING PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM JEST·: f1EJHOD.S C31, C3_9, C78, C138,.C1{t3.,.C112_, C1~, C?~1, Cp1_r,_C_1_Q.64 ___ _ ...... ~·:_,. ~~~ ... -~ .. -• .. MAX LOAD POUNDS 62,000 89,000 87,500 .. ... ·- --- COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH PSI 2190 3150 3090 -. -· .. -· . ~ .. LABORATORY DATA -REMARKS._---'------'--'-.;:;:..:.;...---------::..,µ...~;..,.;.,..=-1.-,Q..~~-- DISTRIBUTION: OWNER, ARCHITECT •. ENGINEER. CONTRACTOR, CITY, SUPPLIER CHECKED BY: Bl27Ubw~1 REVIEWED BY: DATE: J-t-'tB:' _ DATE: B-3-U WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES REPORT OF COMI>RESSION TEST --. 17150 Via Del Campo Suite 307 San Diego, CA 92127 1-800-487 -0355 PROJECT LOT 51 CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER PROJECT NO. 97-306 PROJECT ADDRESS 2091 RUTHERFORD ROAD, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR KOLL CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT/ENGINEER WARE & MALCOMB ARHCITECTS/BURKETT & WONG BLDG. PERMIT NO. 9 6 2.0 3 5 · PLAN FILE NO. '------,~={....:A~--- -SAMPLE DAT-A REPORT OF: . ~ CONCRETE D MORTAR D GROUT D PRISMS DH/ s GROUT D OTHER PLAC~MENT DATE ------=0-1~--2=3_-~9~8 ___ _ DATE RECEIVED IN LAB --=N4-/=A,__ __ _ SUPPLIER ------~N=E=L=S~O=N---=S=L~O=A=N __ _ MIX DESIGN PSI 2500 MIX NUMBER --------=5=1=5____, _______ _ MIX DESCRIPTION ----=N~/=A'----- TYPE OF CEMENT ----=I-I _______ _ TICKET NUMBER 674779 ADMIXTURE WRDA 64 SLUMP __ __,_ ______ ~4~1~/~2~"--- TIME IN MIXER ------~3~5-=M=I=N,__ ___ _ PERCENT AIR ------=N4-/=A,__ __ _ CONC. TEMP NIA AIR TEMP. N /A UNIT WEIGHT WET NIA UNIT WEIGHT DRY ------=N~t~A=------ MIX REQUIRED PSI (f'c) 2500 PSI @ 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY --~B-. _A=L=B=L=I=N_G-E_R LOCATION OF PLACEMENT FOOTING@ H4 CG BEAM FIELD :t,AB IDENTITY NO. 7 1 28 2 28 3 H 4 DATE TESTED 01-30-98 02-20-98 02-20-98 LABORATORY DATA DIMENSIONS INCHES 6 X 12 6 X 12 6 X 12 .. TEST AREA SQ. INCHES 28.27 28.27 28.27 MAX LOAD POUNDS 58,000 84,000 88,000 ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM TEST METHODS *ACTUAL MEASURED AREA C31, C39, C78, C138, C143, C172, C173, C231, C617, C1064 COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH PSI 2050 2970 31;1.0 LABORATORY DATA REMARKS -----------------iJ~,-l,.,;.;.~~~~--- DISTRIBUTION: OWNER, ARCHITECT, ENGINEER, CONTRACTOR. CITY, SUPPLIER CHECKED BY: aQ ~ REV:_[EWED BY:· DATE: ],f-'18". . DATE: 3-1-o/S Wyman Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 FIELD WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING D SHOTCRETE REQU_IRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE ·0 H. S. BOLTING 0 NDT D OTHER INSPECTOR OF 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 SHOP WELDING 0 D/B ANCHORAGE ~ ;~~~C?lffil:t:ke·r:-:fortl-Ro-ad N~7-3Q6 I FOR WEEK ENDING Mar. 6, 1998 f~ttER S'.i';RO~a¥mad Research Center BL§i·..£'~~0. I PLAN FILE NO. R'efffi~t'e"ciE· e'cfflcret e AW~¥&r& Malcomb Architects ljJftlleN ~'(l=(:j<e)THpSi I souRc~~8fr/ Sloan E~~~i-Lo-Torres DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN, RE·BAR GRADE & MFGR.) GR5rr,1cm~<t:tuction Mix design #1349, #3 A615 gr. 60 C™1,JSglf:la_ REPORTED WORK ~yman Testing Laboratories .. CONCRETE INSPECTION 3-5-98 Inspected the reinforcing steel installation for Slab on grade at line 2.5 to 2.9 @ grid A.1 to A. 2, line 2.5 to Line 4 @ grid A.2 to grid F, & line 1.1 to line 4 @ grid F thru K. Inspected reinforcing steel for size, grade, lap, and locations. Inspected the.-placement. and consolidation of 617 cubic yards of concrete, mix· des.ign #t3~ 9 'at the· ·following locations.: Line 2.5 to 2.9 @ grid A.1 to A .. 2, · line 2 ~-5 to line 4 @· grid A.2 to grid F & line 1.1 to line 4, @ grid F to K. One set of 4 test cylinders was taken from grid a.5 @ line 3.9. All concrete was supplied by Nelson/Sloan ticket #68241, truck#601. Slump test results 4-1/.2". One set of 4 samples taken at grid B @ line 3. 9, ticket #682173, truck #350. Slump test results 5-1/2", one set of 4 test cylinders were taken at grid C @ line 3.9 ticket #682216, truck #610. One set of 4 test cylinders were taken at line 3.9 @ grid J.9 ticket #682282, truck #357. Slump test results 4-1/4", one set of 4 test cylinders were taken from line 2.5 @ grid H.5 ticket #682342, truck #602. Slump:_ t_est :.results 4-3/4·". One set o'f 4 test cylinders were Taken --from : 1-ine --\ .': 1.5· @ _grid ·H, ticket.#682.373, truck #306. . .. ' ' -.• • : --.. '", ',_ # -•• ·-' .. --' ... ,.__. ..;_ -. , ' . ' , ., -:--... . . . . '-. ' . ' . ... -. t, : ( .·: _:; ·-•,: .. ,•,:, I . ... ·i]i\J{j[J'• -'#"-._ . --·-. .. CLS 3.:.:9-98.,. Signed copy on file. Felipe Beltran ·.: ·. ·5jVi~~-· .' " CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS. AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. .. Wyman Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 FIELD WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING 0 SHOTCRETE REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 H. S. BOLTING D NDT 0 OTHER INSPECTOR OF 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 SHOP WELDING 0 D/B ANCHORAGE ZC,~TD~~therford Road N<9-7-3Q6 I FOR WEEK ENDING March 6, 1998 E~fR~i~ROc;§:¥rM:iad Research Center BL§'g:!'~~O. I PLAN FILE NO. ~'e11Sfff'6¥!:fe"dE· effilre:P&te AWgf~r& Malcomb Architects ~leN ~~tj<eTHps I I souRcE oR ~@!son/ Sloar E~~~i-Lo-Torres DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN. REsBAR GRADE & MFGR.) GRij'r:l:Ce'Sffl%ction Mix design #1349 c~~graR~8flM~ '-"Wyman Testing Laboratories CONCRETE INSPECTION 3-2-98 S.O.G. 2nd pour: Inspected the placement and consolidation of 440 cubic yards of concrete, mix design #1349 at the following locations:S.O.G. line 4 thru 5.5 @ grid A thru K. One set of 4 concrete samples were taken from grid J.5@ line 4. Concrete supplied by Nelson/Sloan ticket #681113, truck #601. Slump test results 4-3/4". One set of 4 concrete samples were taken from grid H.2 @ line 4.1, concrete by Nelson/Sloan ticket #681145, truck #611. Slump test results 4-1/2". One set of 4 samples were taken from Grid F@ line 4.1. Concrete supplied by Nelson/Sloan ticket# 681193, truck #360. Slump test results 4-3/4". One set of 4 test cylinders were taken from grid D.1@ line 4.1. Concrete supplied Slump test results by Nelson/Sloan ticket #681228, truck #607. 4". One set of 4 test cylinders were taken from grid C@ line 4.1. Concrete was supplied by Nelson/Sloan, ticket #681233, truck #318. Slump test results 4-1/4". ... .. .. ' ,• Signed ~ CLS 3-9-98 .' 9opy on file. , f.CERTIFICATIO,;{oF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. ; " ~· . : ·j .... -,;,_ . ., Felipe Beltran SIGNATURE OF REGISIERED INSPECTOR DATE OF REPORT REGISTER NUMBER Wyman Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 FIELD WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING 0 SHOTCRETE REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 H. S. BOLTING D NDT 0 OTHER INSPECTOR OF 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 SHOP WELDING 0 -D/B ANCHORAGE ~~~D'l'-~therford Road N~.7-306 I FOR WEEK Mar ENDING • 6 ,~8 f~~R 5'1 ~RO(!afl~ad Research Center B~%:.£'ffl !JO, l PLAN FILE NO. CONSTR. MAT'L (TYPE, GRADE, ETC.) AWa_JffiT& Malcomb Architects l!t'Ql~t) ST~j'.TH I souRcE ~g<5n/ S 1 oan E~Wi~Lo-Torres DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN, RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) GRt,11:c~'c9'frtfl:%ction . cer:r~a'fIINf _f!5:@RTE,'Q'1i~e te UWyman Testing Laboratories CONCRETE INSPECTION 2-28-98 Inspected the concrete placement building lines 6 to 7 from A to K (west side) . Approx. 480 cubic yards. Power screed used (senora) . Rebar lifted on 3" dobies. CLS 3-13-98 Signed copy on file. TONY WOROBEY CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. SIGNAIDRE OF REGISTERED INSPECToR DATE OF REPORT REGISfER NUMBER Wyman Testing !/ ·· Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH O REINFORCED CONCRETE REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL O PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 Fl~LD WELDING 0 H. S. BOLTING o· SHOP WELDING INSPECTOR OF O REINFORCED MASONRY JQ~ APDRESS . BLDG. PERMIT NO. ARCHITECT DESIGN STRENGTH SOURCE.OR MFGR. DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN, RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) LAB CONCRETE INSPECTION 3-24-98 0 FIREPROOFING 0 NOT 0 0/B ANCHORAGE FOR WEEK ENDING . 0 SHOTCRETE 0 OTHER ·Inspected the reinforcing steel installation for panels on line 7 ; {tilt up panel #21 thru 39 on sheet 8-4 1 w-p 3 & 4 per detail ;5/sd2, 7/sd3, ll/sd2 typical reinforcing was inspected on !3-20-98. . . c· .. . :. \ -:i ~ .... . .. ·' . r-•...... --: ·. ! .. ! -~ :: ; .\ .... :.. : -~ .. •· • ,-, ' ..... . --.,. ' ! .~ --~ ; ... -: .. -_ ,-· -.. ·-~ ., • ; J CLS4-l-98 Signed copy on file. Felipe Beltran CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. slGNAIOl~E OF REGIStERED INsPECloi~ bAtE OF REPORf REGISTER NUMBER Wyman Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH O REINFORCED CONCRETE O FIELD WELDING REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL O PRE-STR~SSED CO~CRETE O H. S. BOLTING INSPECTOR OF O REINFORCED MASONRY O SHOP WELDING N~F-306 o. Awan:re::r & Ma SOURCE OR MFGR. -Lo-Torres 0 FIREPROOFING D NDT 0 D/B ANCHORAGE FOR WEEK Mar ~ 2 0 ENDING C REPbRTED WORK yman es ing ories CONCRETE INSPECTlON 3-20-98 0 SHOTCRETE D OTHER 98 19 Perimeter footing inspection pre~placement reinforcing inspection. Wall line K from point 3.0 to corner K/7. Wall line 7 from corner K/7 to corner A/7. Wall line A from corner A/7 to corner A/4. Al " " A/ 1-4 " 3 /A. 1 . 3 " " A/ 1 . 3 " 3 /A. 2 A. 2 " 3/A2 " 2/A2 2 " 2/A2 " 2/B These perimeter footings are as per 1-SD2. 3-SD2. Are 2xl W2 #4T & B. Wall line K requires #4 dowels@ 24" oc to slab pour strip as do wall lines A-B/1-4 where grade is at SOG elevation. Note: That column designated 3 is a spread footing to receive the Extra weight of in wall pilasters. CLS 3-26-98 Signed copy on file. Rockland Dale CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPL V WITH THE APPROVED PLANS.& SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. SIGNATOl~E OF REGISTERED INSPECToR DAI E OF REPORT REGISTER NUMBER Wyman ff Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH O REINFORCED CONCRETE O FIELD WELDING REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL O PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE O H. S. BOLTING INSPECTOR OF O REINFORCED MASONRY O SHOP WELDING TH SOURCE DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN. RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) es 1ng CONCRETE INSPECTION 3-20-98 0 FIREPROOFING 0 NOT 0 D/B ANCHORAGE FOR WEEK Mar • ENDING 0 SHOTCRETE D OTHER 19 Tilt up panels reinforcing placement inspection of panels #'s 1,2 3,4,5,6,9,10,11,12,13,14,15r16,17,1S,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27, 28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,47,48,49 Typical reinforcing placement is complete and a_cceptable with the following exceptions: (Corrected) Panel #1 needs 1 #5 at bottom of door. Panel #18 needs 2 #5 at each door jamb. Panel #30 needs 2 #5 over knock out. Panel #33 needs 2 #5 over knock out Diagonal at openings need completed clarification needs at panels #22/23 double in wall pilasters have D & J up-1 shown 2. Note: That no structural embeds or there accompanying reinforcing have been placed. · CLS 3-26-98 Signed copy on file. Rockland Dale CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATldNS. ANO APPLICABLE SECTIONS. SIGNAIOl~E OF !~EGISTERED INSPECfoR DATE OF REPORt REGISTER NUMBER ,._ . ,., :. Wyman ff Testing Laboratories· (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 FIELD WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING 0 SHOTCRETE REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 H. S. BOLTING D NDT 0 OTHER INSPECTOR OF 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 SHOP WELDING 0 D/B ANCHORAGE J~~.t?R®.ut-herrorct Road N~7-3Q6 I FOR WEEK mar. ~u ~!3 ENDING . 19 dii@iER QR.lfpo.1tra~.M31bact Research Center BL~.P09IB~-I PLAN FILE NO. ~IX:190tl.eTYPE. GRADE. ETC.) AiW8!~er & Malcomb Architects r,iiic'n,H.r_~T~H I souRcE oR I\Neli.son/ sloa ~NN©JEl=b.i-Lo-Torres DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN, RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) G!W~u.c~tt:Jeu:ction zouu ~-~ ~LbL q to ~e1son1s1oan mix b.':>l .... . REPORTED WORK LAWyman Testing Laooratories CONCRETE INSJ;?ECTION 3-20-98 Observation and testing of 80 cubic yards Nelson/sloan mix #6515 A 2500 ¾ PP 161 4 to at perimeter footings @Kline 3. to 7, 7 line K to A, A line 7 to 2. Sampled load 4 truck #334, ticket #686007, slump 4" after addition of 10 gal. H20 to 10 cubic yards. Cast one set of 4 concrete compressive strength specimens marked 97-306/3-20 footings. CLS 3-26-98 Signed copy on file. Rockland Dale . CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. SIGNAIURE OF REGISfERED INSPEcioR DATE OF REPORf REGISTEI~ N0MBEI~ .... 17150 Via Del Campo Suite 307 San Diego, CA 92127 1-800-487 -0355 WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES REfORT OF COMPRESSION TEST PROJECT LOT 51 CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER PROJECT NO. 97-306 ~ROJECT ADDRESS 2091 RUTHE~FORD ROAD, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR KOLL CONSTRUCTION. ARCHITECT/ENGINEER WARE & MALCOMB ARHCITECTS/BURKETT & WONG BLDG. PERMIT NO. 962035 PLAN FILE NO. N/A SAMPLE DATA . REPORT OF: ~ CONCRETE D MORTAR D GROUT' D PRISMS DH/ s GROUT D OTHER PLACEMENT DATE ___ __,;:0~2~-~2~8~~~9~8,___---,-_ DATE RECEIVED IN LAB 03-02-98 SUPPLIER --------------=-N-=E=L=S~O=N-'----'S=L=O=A=N"'-----MIX DESIGN PSI 4000 MIX NUMBER ____________ __,;:1=3~4=9,__ ___ -,-_ MIX DESCRIPTION ----~1~"-----R~O~C=K~- TYPE OF CEMENT I II TICKET NUMBER 680850 ADMIXTURE TIME IN MIXER CONC. TEMP WRDA 64 POLARSET SLUMP ---------~3~1=/~2~'-'-- N/A PERCENT AIR ------~N~{~A=------- 690 AIR TEMP. N/A UNIT WEIGHT WET NIA UNIT WEIGHT DRY ----=N~/=A=------- MIX-~EQUIRED PSI (f'c) 4000 PSI@ 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY T. WOROBEY LOCATION OF PLAC~MENT EXACTLY 15 FT.NORTH OF LINE A AT LINE 7 FIELD LAB IDENTITY NO. 6 9 27 10 27 11 H 1i DATE TESTED 03-06-98 03-27-98 03-27-9$ LABORATORY DATA DIMENSIONS INCHES 6 X i2 6 X 12 6. x.12 TEST AREA SQ. INCHES 28.27 28.27 28.27 MAX LOAD POUNDS 81,000 137,000 135,500 ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE ~IT~ ASTM TEST METHODS *ACTUAL MEASURED AREA C31, C39, C78, C138, C143, C172, C173, C231, C617, C1064 LABORATORY DATA REMARKS DISTRiBUTION: OWNER, ARCHITECT, ENGINEER, CONTRACTOR. CITY, SUPPLIER COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH PSI 2860 4850 4790 I CHECKED BY: 8,f'.'~t' REVIEWED BY: ·-£&~§!,:i,:S,,tca~-4:-l-f:14~~~- DATE: 1-/---&, ,qt/ DATE: '&1-'t I WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES ' . REPORT OF COMPRESSION TEST PROJECT LOT 51 CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER PROJECT NO. 97-306 PROJECT ADDRESS 2091 RUTHERFORD ROAD, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR ----~K~O~L~L:!-::C~O~N~S~T~R~U~C~T~I~O~N~·------------------- ARCHITECT/ENGINEER ~W~A~R~E~&~MA~L~C~O~M~B~A~RH=C~I~T~E~C~T~S~/~B~URK=~E~T~T'--"'&~W=O=N=G'-------- :BLDG. PERMIT NO. 962035 PLAN FILE NO. N/A SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF: ~CONCRETE OMoRTAR OGROUT OPRISMS OH/S-GROUT OoTHER PLACEMENT DATE ------"0~2_-~2~8_-=9-8 _______ _ DATE RECEIVED IN LAB ---=-0~3-_0=2~-~9~8.___ SUPPµIE~ ------------=-N=E=L=S~O=N ......... S=L=O=A=N'--_ MIX DESIGN PSI 4000 MTX NUMBER ----'---------=1=3'--"4=9 ____ -,--_ MIX DESCRIPTION 1 11 ROCK TYPE OF CEMENT I II TICKET NUMBER 680899 ADMIXTURE WRDA 64 POLARSET SLUMP 4 II TIME IN MIXER ---~=N~/=A'---'-----PERCENT AIR ------~N~/~A=----- CONC. TEMP 6 o? AIR TEMP. 740 UNIT WEIGHT WET N/A UNIT WEIGHT DRY MIX REQUIRED PSI (f'c) 4000 PSI @ 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY LOCATION OF PLACEMENT .EXACTLY 13411 NORTH OF LINE A.AT 6.5 FIELD LAB IDENTITY NO. 6 13 27 14 27 15 H 16 DATE TESTED 03-06-98 03-27-98 03-27-98 ~ABORATORY DATA DIMENSIONS INCHES 6 X 1,2, 6 X 1,2, 6 X 12 TEST AREA SQ. INCHES 28.27 28.27 28.27 MAX LOAD POUNDS 75,000 129,000 118,500 ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM TEST METHODS *ACTUAL MEASURED AREA C31, C39, t78, C138, C143, C172, C173,, C231, C617, C1064 · .. DISTRIBUTION.: OWNER, ARCHITECT, ENGINEER, CONTRACTOR, CITY, SUPPLIER_ CHECKED BY: M ~ "·-v DATE: $:':--k ,.,. 9k' . . , REVIEWED BY: DATE: l/-'l--'18 NIA T. WOROBEY COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH PSI 2650 4560 1 4190 -(?-- 17150 Via Del Campo . Suite 307 ~ San Diego, CA 92127 ~ 1-800-487-0355 WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES REPORT OF COMPRESSION TEST PROJECT LOT 51 CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER PROJECT NO. 97-306 PROJECT ADDRESS 2091 RUTHERFORD-ROAD, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR KOLL CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT/ENGINEER WARE & MALCOMB ARHCITECTS/BURKETT & WONG BLDG. PERMIT NO. 962035 PLAN FILE NO. N/A SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF: [fil CONCRETE D MORTAR D GROUT D PRISMS DH/ s GROUT D OTHER PLACEMENT DATE ___ _;0=2_-=2~8_-=9~8--~- SUP~LIE~ -------=N=E=L=S~O=N',-"'SFL=O=A=N'--_ MIX NUMBER ----------=1=3~4=9 __ _._ __ _ TYPE OF CEM~NT -----=I'-£-=I=I~.'------ DATE RECEIVED IN LAB MIX DESIGN PSI MIX DESCRIPTION TICKET NUMBER 03-02-98 4000 111 ROCK 680972 ADMIXTURE WRDA 64 POLARSET SLUMP 4 1/211 TIME IN MIXER CONC. TEMP UNIT WEIGHT WET N/A PERCENT AIR ------~N~/~A=----- 700 AIR TEMP. 770 N /A UNIT WEIGHT DRY N /A MIX-REQUIRED PSI (f'c) 4.000 PSI @ 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY T. WOROBEY LOCATION OF PLACEMENT EXACTLY 235 FT NORTH OF LINE A AT 6.5 LABORATORY DATA FIELD LAB IDENTITY NO. DATE TESTED DIMENSIONS INCHES TEST AREA SQ. INCHES MAX LOAD POUNDS COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH PSI 6 17 03--06-98 6 X 12 28.27 100,000 3540 27 18 03-27-98 6 X 12 28.27 149,000 5.270. 27 19 03-27-98 6 X 12 28 ._27 142,000 ,50:2.0 ·1 ' . H 20 '" ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WlTH ASTM TEST METHODS *ACTUAL MEASURED AREA C31, C39, C78, C138, C143, C172, C173, C:231, C617, C1064 ;,,· LABORATORY DATA REMARKS ----,-----,--------.,........c-.----,.44~c:;:;::;;:;;;::;:;::,;;:,µ/.,~,---- DISTRIBUTION: OWNER, ARCHITECT, ENGINEER, -CONTRACTOR, CITY, SUPPLIER CHECKED BY: ef}~b1A REVIEWED BY: . -'6a..,t1.~~~~.,J,,U1ii;i;S.,,:~tr" DATE:, ,'f~ 6 · 9V 1 DATE: C/-t :ft WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES REPORT OF COMPRESSION TEST PROJECT .LOT 51 CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER. PROJECT NO. 17150 Via Del Campo Suite 307 San Diego, CA 92127 1-800-487 -0355 · 97-306 PROJECT ADDRESS --=2~0~9~1:.......=.R=U~T=H=E=R=F~O=R=D ........ R=O=A=D-,--'C=AR=L=S=B=A=D~,~--C=A=L=I=F~O=RN=-=-I=A=-------- CONTRACTOR ----------'K=O=L=L=-a.C~O=N=S=T=R=U~C~T=I-O~N-'-'-. ....,....,.----------------- ARCHITECT/ENGINEER. WARE & MALCOMB ARHCITECTS/BURKETT & WONG BLDG. PERMIT NO. 962035 PLAN FILE NO. N/A SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF: [RI CONCRETE D MORTAR D GROUT D PRISMS DH/ s GROUT D OTHER P~CEMENT DATE ------=0~2~-~2~8_-~9~8----____ _ SUPPLIER -------=N=E=L=S~O=N~.~S=L=O=A=N-- MIX NUMBER ______ 1=3~4=9 _____ _ T¥PE OF CEMENT II ·ADMIXTURE WRDA 64 POLARSET TIME IN MIXER _____ --:::N~t~A.:-____ _ CONC. TEMP N /A UNIT WEIGHT WET N/A DATE RECEIVED IN LAB ----=0~3_-~0=2~-~9~8 __ _ MIX DESIGN PSI ------'4~0~0~0----__ _ MIX DESCRIPTION ----~1~"-=R-O~C=K __ TICKET NUMBER 681034 SLUMP ---------~4~1~/_4~'-'-- PERCENT AIR ------~N~L~A=------ AIR TEMP. ~/A {JNIT WEIGHT DRY ___ ___,N=/~A=----- MIX-REQUIRED PSI (f'c} 4000 PSI @ 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY ___ T=-W:..:..O=R=-=-O=B=E=Y=---- LOCATION OF PLACEMENT EXACTLY 350 FT N. 0¥ A LINE AT 6.5 FIELD LAB .IDENTITY NO. 6 21 27 22 27 23 H 24 DATE TESTED 0;3-06--98 03-27-98 03--27-98 . LABORAT.ORY DATA DIMENSIONS INCHES .. 6 X 1_2 6 x 12 6 X 12 -. - TEST AREA SQ. INCHES 28.27 28.27 28.27 MAX LOAD POUNDS .101,500 140,000 140,000 ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM TEST METHODS *ACTUAL MEASURED AREA C31, C39, C78, C138, C143, C172, C173, C231, C617, C1064 -., LABO~TORY DAT4 REMARKS DISTRIBUTION: OWNER; ARCHITECT. ENGINEER. CONTRACTOR. CITY, SUPPLIER CHECKED B~: M~A, REVIEWED BY: DATE: __ lf. ~--f~ l DATE: 1/-1--ft COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH PSI 3590 4950 .4.9,50 7 \NYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES REPORT OF COMPRESSION TEST . . PROJECT LOT 51. CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER PROJECT NO. 17150 Via Del Campo Suite 307 San Diego, CA 92127 1-800-487 -0355 ·97 . .:.306 PROJECT ADDRESS 2091 RUTHERFORD ROAD, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR _____ K~O=L=L=-C~O=N=S=T=R=U~C=T=!=O=N"----------------------- ARCHITECT/ENGINEER _W=AR=E=--=&::.....:MA=L=·C=O=M=B'-=ARH==CI=T=E=C=T=S~L~B=U=R=K=E=T=T-=&~W~O=N=G=-------- BLDG. PERMIT NO. 962035 PLAN FILE NO. NIA SAMPLE DAT~ REPORT OF: ~ CONCRETE D MORTAR D GROUT D PRISMS DH/ s GROUT D OTHER :PLACEMENT DATE 02-28-98 DATE RECEIVED IN LAB SUPPLIER , NELSON SLOAN MIX DES-IGN PSI MIX NUMBER 1349 MIX DESCRIPTION TYPE OF CEMENT I II. TICKET NUMBER ADMIXTURE WRDA 64 SLUMP TIME IN MIXER 25 MIN PERCENT AIR CONC .• TEMP N/A AIR TEMP. UNIT WEIGHT WET N/A UNIT WEIGHT DRY MIX-REQUIREO PSI (f'c) 4000 :EiSI @ 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY LOCATION OF PLACEMENT EXACTLY 18 FT SOUTH OF KLINE AT 70 LABORATORY DATA FIELD LAB . IDENTITY NO. 6 25 27 26 27 27 :H 28 DATE TESTED 03-06-98 03-27-98 03-~7-98 DIMENSIONS INCHES 6 X 12 6 X 12 6 X 12 TEST AREA SQ. INCHES 28.27 2:8. ~7 28.-27 MAX LOAD POUNDS 61,500 148,000 145,000 ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE·WITH ASTM TEST METHODS *ACTUAL MEASURED AREA C31, C39, C78; C138, C143, C172, C:173, C231, C617, C.1064 .. DISTRIBUTION: OWNER I ARCHITECT I ENGINEER, CONTRACTOR, CITY I SUPP.LIER CHECKED BY: atJ~lu.A < . REVIEWED BY: DATE: · 3/-k-QY y DATE: l/:--1,.'/t 03-02-98 4000 1 11 ROCK 681069· 4 3/411 N/A N/A N/A T. WOROBEY COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH PSI 2180 ·5239\ -5.13-0 . ! 17150 Via Del Campo Suite 307 San Diego, CA 92127 1-800-487-0355 WYMAN TESTiNG LAB.ORATORIES REPORT OF COMPRESSION TEST ;:, ·.. . .. , ' PROJECT LOT 51 CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER PROJECT NO. 97--3-06-·, PROJECT ADDRESS 2091 RUTHERFORD ROAD. CARLSBAD. CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR ----=K=O=L=L'---"'C=O=N=S=T=R=U~C=T=I=O=N ______________ --'--------- ARCHITECT/ENGINEER ---=-=-W~AR=E_&=--.:MA=L=C=O=M=B"'-"'ARH==C=I=T~E=C~T~S~/=B=URK==ET=T-=--=&_W~O=N=G=-------- BLDG. PERMIT NO. 962035 PLAN FILE NO. N/A SAMPLE DATA REPOR'l' OF: @CONCRETE 0MORTAR 0GROUT 0PRISMS OH/S GROUT 00THER PLACEMENT DATE 03-02-98 ----------=-----=--=------- SUPPLIER -----------=N=E=L=S~O=N--=S=L=O=A=N __ -MIX NUMBER -------=1=3-=4=9---'------------ TYPE OF CEMENT --------=I=I------------ ADMIXTURE WRDA 64 POLARSET TIME IN MIXER ---'-'----~7=5-=M=I=N----~ CONC. TEMP 600 UNIT WEIGHT WET N/A .DATE RECEIVED IN. LAB _______ 0~3_-~0~3_-=9~8 ___ _ MI~ DESIGN PSI -----------4~0~0~0 _____ _ MIX DESCRIPTION ----=N~/=A ____ _ TICKET NUMBER 681113 SLUMP ---------~4~3_/_4~'-'----: PERCENT AIR ------=N~/=A=----- AIR TEMP. 550 UNIT WEIGHT DRY ----=N~/=A=----- MIX REQUIRED PSI (f'c) 4000 PSI @ 28 DAY$ SAMPLES MADE BY ____ F~. __ B=E=L=T=RAN~- LOCAT.ION OF PL,ACEMENT . SOG 2ND POUR GRID J .• 5 @_ LINE 4 • 1 FIELD LAB IDENTITY NO. 1 29 2_8 30 28 31 H 32 DATJl: TESTED 0;3-09-98 03-30-98 03-30-~8 LABORATORY DATA . DIMENSIONS INCHES 6 x.12 .9 X 12 6 :x 12 TEST AREA SQ. INCHES 28.27 28,.27 28.27 MAX·LOAD POUNDS 83,500 125,000 124,500 ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM TEST METHODS *ACTUAL MEASURED AREA C31, C39., C78, C138, C.143, C172, C173, -C231, C617, C106?+ , DISTRIBUTION: OWNER. ARCHITECT. ENGINEER. CONTRACTOR. CITY, SUPPLIER CHECKED BY: N7~ REVIEWED BY:. DATE: 'f--(-ff ~ DATE: '{-1-f8 I: 1, COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH PSI 2950 44icr I ,r400- WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES -REPORT OF COMPRESSION TEST 17150 Via Del Campo Suite 307 San Diego, CA 92127 1-800-487-0355 PROJECT LOT.51 CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER PROJECT NO. 97-306 PROJECT ADDRESS 2·091 RUTHERFORD ROAD, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR ----=K=O=L=L=--=C=O=N=S=T=R=U~C=T=I=O=N'----'---------------------- ARCHlTECT/ENGINEER _.....W=A=R=E--=&~MA=L=C=O=M=B=--=ARH==C=I=T=E=C=T=S~{~B~URK==E=T=T'----"'&"---'-'W~O=N~G _______ _ BLDG. PERMIT NO. 962035 PLAN FILE NO. N/A SAMPI,rE-DATA REPORT OF: [filcoNCRETE 0MORTAR QGROUT 0PRISMS OH/S GROUT 00THER PLACEM~NT DATE 03~02-98 DATE RECEIVED IN LAB -~03--_0_3_-_9_8 __ SUPPLIER NELSON SLOAN MIX DESIGN PSI 4000 MIX NUMBER 1349 --MIX DESCRIPTION ----=N~/=A=----- TYPE OF CEMENT ------~I=I _______ _ TICK~T NUMBER 681145 ADMIXTURE WRDA 64 POLARSET SLUMP -----------'4~1-L-2-" __ _ TIME IN MIXER 75 MIN PERCENT AIR ------~N_{~A ____ _ CONC. TEMP 590 AIR TEMP. 550 ·UNIT WEIGHT WET N/A UNIT WEIGHT DRY ______ N~/~A=----- MIX REQUIRED PSI (f'c) 4000 PSI @ 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY --~F=--a-. -B=E=L=T=RA=N--- LOeATION OF PLACEMENT --,--=H=·-=2_@_· =L=I=N=E:......:4..:.•-=1 _________ ---,-___________ _ FIELD LAB IDENTiTY NO. --- i ;3_3 28 34 28 35 H 36 C DATE TESTED 03-09-9-8 0;3-30-98 03-30-98 -- LABORATORY DATA DIMENSIONS INCHES 6 X 12 6 X 12 6 X 12 TEST AREA SQ. INCHES 28.27 _28. 27 28.27 MAX LOAD POUNDS 96,_500 139,000 138,000 ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM TEST METHODS *ACTUAL MEASURED AREA C31, C39, C78, C138, C143-, C172, C173, C231, C617, C1064 - LABORATORY DATA REMARKS DISTRIBUTION: OWNER. ARCHITECT, ENGINEER, CONTRACTOR, CITY. SUPPLIER CHECKED BY: {J/!_J~M4W1J" _ :REVIEWED BY: · DATE: 'f-6 -9 8'.' -DATE: '(-'Ifft COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH PSI 3410 A~i~O -,t8·8·o- --- 17150 Via Del Campo Suite 307 San Diego, CA 92127 1-800-487 -0355 WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES REPORT OF COMPRESSION TEST PROJECT . LOT 5.1 CARLSBAD RESEARCH . CENTER PROJECT NO. 97-306 PROJECT .ADDRESS 2 0.91 RUTHERFORD ROAD, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR. KOLL CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT/ENGINEER WARE & MALCOMB ARHCITECTS/BURKETT & WONG BLDG. PERMIT NO. 962035 · PLAN FILE NO. N/A SAMPLE QATA REPORT OF: ~ CONCRETE D MORTAR D GROUT 0-PRISMS D H/S GROUT D OTHER PLACEMENT DATE 03-02-98 DATE RECEIVED IN LAB ---=-0=3_-~0=3_-=9=8 __ SUPPLIER NELSON SLOAN MIX DESIGN PSI 4000 MIX NUMBER 1349 MIX DESCRIPTION ----N~LA~--- TYPE OF CEMENT ----=I=I'-,-__________ _ TICKET NUMBER 681193 ADMIXTURE WRDA 64 POLARSET SLU11P ---------~4'---"3-L~4~"--- TIME IN MIXER 74 MIN PERCENT AIR ------=N~/=A ______ _ CONC. TEMP AIR TEMP. 65o UNIT WEIGH'I1 WET NIA UNIT WEIGHT DRY N/A MIX REQUIRED PSI (f'c) 4000 PSI@ 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY F. BELTRAN LOCATION OF PLACEMENT --=G=R=I=D_F=-@....___.L=I=N=E'"---'4~-~1"---""S~O~G=--------------- FIELD LAB !!)ENTITY NO. 7 37 28 38 .. 28 39 H 40 DATE TESTED 03-09-98 03-:-30-98 . 03-30-_98 LABORATORY DATA DIMENSIONS INCHES 6 X 12 6 X 12 6 X l,_2 TEST AREA SQ. INCHES 28.~7 2·8. 27 28.27 MAX LOAD POUNDS 82,500 133,000 133,500 ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WIIH ASTM TEST METHODS *ACTUAL MEASURED AREA C31, C39, C78, C138, C143, C172, C173, C231, C617, C1064 . , LABORATORY DATA REMARKS DISTRIBUTION: OWNER. ARCHITECT. ENGINEER, CONTRACTOR, .CITY, SUPPLIER. CHECKED BY: £'.Q 1~ DATE: i&t ~ rt ,., REVIEWED BY:· DATE: q,.tf-18 COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH PSI 2920 .47'00 -,fTZ'o 17150 Via Del Campo Suite 307 San Diego, CA 92127 1-800-487 -0355 WYMAN TESTING LABORATORl·ES REPORT OF COMPRESS-ION TEST PROJECT LOT 51 CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER PROJECT NO. 97-306 PROJECT ADDRESS 2091 RUTHERFORD ROAD, CARLSBAD,. CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR KOLL CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT/ENGINEER_ WARE & MALCOMB ARHCITECTS/B~ETT & WONG BLDG. PE~IT NO. 962035 PLAN F'ILE NO. N/A SAMPLE DATA_ REPORT OF: [RI CONCRETE D MORTAR D GROT,JT D PRISMS DH;/ s GROUT D OTHER PLACEMENT DATE ----'=0=3_-~0=2~--=9-=8 _ __, __ SUPPLIER -----,-------"-N=E=L=S~O=N------'S=L~O=A=N----- MIX NUMBER 1349 -----~-----------..,.......-- TYPE .OF CEMENT ----=I=I'--------- ADMIXTURE WRDA 64 POLARSET TIM;E IN MIXER .......... ___ -=9=1'--=M=I=N _______ _ CONC. TEMP 65o UNIT WEIGHT WET __ __,N=/~A=-------- DATE RECEIVED IN LAB --=0~3_-~0~3_--=9~8 __ MIX DESIGN PSI 4000 MIX DESCRIPTION ----=N~/=A=-------- TICKET NUMBER 681228 SLUM);> 4 3 / 4 11 PERCENT AIR ------=-N~/-=A=----- AIR TEMP. 68o UNIT WEIGHT DRY ----=N~{=A=----- MIX REQUIRED PSI (f'c) 400-0 PSI@ 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY F. BELTRAN LOCATION OF PLACEMENT GRID D.1@ LINE 4.1 FIELD LAB IDENTITY NO. 7 41 28 42 28 43 H 44 DATE TESTED 03-09-98 0:3-:-30:-98 03-30-98 LABORATOR~ DATA DIMENSIONS INCHES 6 X 12 6 X 12 9 -~ 1.2. TEST AREA SQ. INCHES 28.27 28 .• 27 28.27 MAX LOAD POUNDS 84,000 129,500 126,000 ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WIT-H ASTM TEST METHODS *ACTUAL MEASURED AREA C31, C39, C78, C138,. C143, C172, C173, C231, C617, C1064 , LABORATORY Dl-\TA REMARKS DISTRIBUTiON: OWNER. ARCHITECT. ENGINEER. CONTRACTOR. CITY, SUPPLIER CHECKED BY: f)i!~,r., t. REVIEWED BY: . DATE: '-/-~ -·'f k" PATE: '/-f-1g COMPREf;!SIVE STRENGTH PSI 2970 4580, 44-6'0 ' WYMAN TESTING LABORATORI_E·s REPORT OF COMPRESSION TEST --. - 17150 Via Del Campo Suite 307 San Diego, CA 92127 1-800-487-0355 PROJECT LOT 51 CARLSBAD· RESEARCH CENTER PROJECT NO. 97-306 PROJECT ADDRESS 2091 RUTHERFORD ROAD, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR . KOLL CONSTRUCTION ---------=-::.;::=::.._;:=.:.=.::=:.=-:==>----------------------- . ARCHITECT/ENGINEER .WARE & MALCOMB ARHCITECTS/BURKETT & WONG BLDG. PERMIT NO. 962035 PLAN FILE NO. N/A SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF·: ~·CONCRETE 0MORTAR QGROUT 0PRISMS 0H/S GROUT 0OTHER PLACEMENT DATE 03-02-98 DATE RECE~VED IN SUPPLIER NELSON SLOAN MIX DESIGN PSI MIX NUMBER 1349 MIX DESCRIPTION TYPE OF CEMENT ---------=I=I.__ _____ _ TICKET NUMBER ADMIXTURE WRDA 64 POLARSET SLUMP TIME IN MIXER 6 0 MIN PERCENT AIR CONC. TEMP 65o AIR TEMP. UNIT WEIGHT WET ---~N~t~A=----,------- MIX REQUIRED PSI (f'c) 4000 'PSI @ 28 DAYS UNIT WEIGHT DRY SAMPLES MADE BY LAB 03-03-98 4000 N/A 681253 4 1/411 N/A 68° N/A F. BELTRAN LOCATION OF PLACEMENT .,......~-~G=R=I=D---'-C........,,@'----"L=I=N=E'---4~.~1.__ _______________ _ FIELD LAB IDENTITY NO. 7 45 28 4Q 28 47 H 48 DATE TESTED· o~-09-98 03-30-98 03-3.0-98 LABORATORY DATA DIMENSIONS INCHES 6 X 1-2 6 X 12 .. 6 X 12 TEST AREA SQ. INCHES 28.27 28.27 28.27 MAX LOAD POUNDS 73,000 114,500 115,000 ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM TEST METHODS *ACTUAL MEASURED AREA C31, C39, C78, C138, C:143, C1-72, C173, C231; C617,· C1064 , ' DISTRIBUTION: OWNER. ARCHITECT. ENGINEER. CONTRACTOR. CITY, SUPPLIER CHECKED BY: eJ}7b-e/4c,hd~ DATE: t./-,-9f REVIEWED BY: DATE: </· !-fg COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH PSI 2580 .. 4nso .. 4·070 l .. ~. ~E Wyman Testing Laboratories COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH O REINFORCED CONCRETE REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL O PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE INSPECTOR OF O REINFORCED MASONRY JOB ADDRESS OWNER OR PROJECT NAME L .I 0 FIELD WELDING 0 H. S. BOLTING. D· SHOP WELDING CONSTR. MAT'L (TYPE. GRADE. ETC.) .ARCHITECT Reinforce DESIGN STRENGTH SOURCE OR MFGR. .DESCRIBE MArL.(MIX DESIGN, RE-BAA GRADE & MFGR.) CONCRETE INSPECTION 3-24-98 (619) 675-0270 0 FIREPROOFING ONDT 0 0/B ANCHORAGE FOR WEEK ENDING . 0SHOTCRETE 0 OTHER ;rnspected the reinforcing steel installation for panels on line 7 (tilt up panel #21 thru 39 on sheet' 8--:-4, w-p 3 & 4 per detail :sfsd2, 7/sd3, ll/sd2 typical reinforcing was inspected on : 3-20-98 .. . . . ,,. -..... .. . ., ',,• .. ..... ,. \ . ' -.. . ' . :-· : .. .;:. ~ . ~ .. -' .. -·-' . : ,.-: r .i .:· : :~ :) : -, ~ P ~ • :.:: .' • J~, 5 .,. • I ' -. ~ ~· • J • ~ I --' ? --. CLS 4-1-98 CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED All OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. .... --. .\ i ~~ Wyman -Testing · [ Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH O REINFORCED CONCRETE O FIELD WELDING REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL O PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE O H. S. BOLTING 0 FIREPROOFING O SHOTCRETE 0 NDT O OTHER INSPECTOR OF O REINFORCED MASONRY O SHOP WELDING 0 D/B ANCHORAGE N~fl-306 FOR WEEK Mar. 20 98 ENDING 19 PLAN FILE NO. AW'a-!lre::r & Ma co SOURCE OR MFGR. -Lo-Torres ories CONCRETE INSPECTION 3-20-98 Perimeter footing inspection pre-placement reinforcing inspection. Wall line K from point 3.0 to corner K/7. Wall line 7 from corner K/7 to corner A/7. Wall line A from corner A/7 to corner A/4. Al" "A/1-4" 3/A.1. 3 " "A/1.3" 3/A.2 A. 2 '' 3/A2 " 2/A2 2 " 2/A2 " 2/B These perimeter footings are as per 1-SD2. 3-SD2. Are 2xl W2 #4T & B •. Wall line K requires #4 dowels ·@ 24" oc to slab pour strip as do wall lines A-B/1-4 where grade is at SOG elevation. Note: That column designated 3 is a spread footing to receive the Extra weight of in wall pilasters. CLS 3-26-98 Signed copy on file. Rockland Dale CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE · I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVEQ Pl.ANS & <.. 2 Ci ~ SPECIFICATIONS; AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. ~ATE OF REPi~ 18Gc;1 REGISTER NUMBER Wyman Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH O REINFORCED CONCRETE O FIELD WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING O SHOTCRETE REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL O PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE O H. S. BOLTING D NDT D OTHER INSPECTOR OF O REINFORCED MASONRY O SHOP WELDING 0 D/B ANCHORAGE N~.7-306 FOR WEEK Mar • ENDING 19 TH SOURCE DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN, RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) CONCRETE INSPECTION 3-20-98 Tilt up panels reinforcing placement inspection of panels #'s 1,2 3,4,5,6,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27, 28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,47,48,49 Typical reinforcing placement is complete and a~ceptable with the following exceptions: . (Corrected) Panel #1 needs 1 #5 .at bottom of door. · Panel #18 needs 2 #5 at each door jamb. Panel #30 needs 2 #5 over knock out. Panel #33 needs 2 #5 over knock out Diagonal at openings need completed clarification needs at panels #22/23 double in wali pilasters have D & J up-1 shown 2. Note: That no structural embeds or there accompanying reinforcing have been placed. · CLS 3-26 .... 98 Signed copy on file. Rockland Dale CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & ~ L <; ~ SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. . . DATE o~EP6RT llii~ Wyman --Testing -· [ Laboratories· (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH O REINFORCED CONCRETE O FIELD WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING O SHOTCRETE REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL O PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE DH. S. BOLTING D NDT D OTHER INSPECTOR OF O REINFORCED MASONRY . 0 SHOP WELDING 0 D/B ANCHORAGE N&7-3Q6 FOR WEEK mar • ENDING 19 PE:GRADE, ETC.) AJWB!igeT & Malcomb Arc . DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESiGN, RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) . C~lQl.<UC J.Oil e sons oan Ill.J.X REPORTED WORK LA yman CONCRETE INSPECTION 3-20-98 Observation and testing of 80 cubic yards Nelson/sloan mix #6515 A 2500 ¾ PP 161 4 to at perimeter footings @ K line 3 to 7, 7 line K to A, A line 7 to 2. Sampled load 4 truck #334, ticket #686007, slump 4" after addition of 10 gal. H20 to 10 cubic yards. Castone set of 4 concrete compressive strength specimens marked 97-306/3-20 footings. CLS 3-26-98 Signed copy on file. Rockland Dale CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED Atl OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS. AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. /;'' . ' WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES REPORT OF COMt>~ESSION TEST. 17150 Via Del Campo Suite 307 San Diego, CA 92127 1-800-487-0355 PROJ:ECT LOT 51 CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER PROJECT·NO. 97-306 PROJECT ADDRESS ~091 RUTHERFOim ROAD,. CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR KOLL CONSTRUCTION ----==..__,_=-=-=-=='---=-=--=-------------------- ARCHITECT/ENGINEER ~W=AR=·=E--=&~MA=L=C=O=M=B~_~ARH=·=C=I~T=E=C=T=S~/=B=URK==ET=T=-=&_W=O=N=G=-------- ·BLDG. PERMIT NO. 962035 PLAN FILE NO. N/A S~PLE DATA REPORT OF: [~] CONCRETE D MO:R.TAR D GROUT D PRISMS DH/ s GROUT D OTHER PLACEMENT DATE -----=0=3_-=05=--9=8::.-___ DATE RECEIVED IN LAB -~N=-,...:/A=---- SUPPLlER --------------=-N=E=L=S~O=N"-=S=L=O=A=N,___ MIX DESIGN PSI 4000 MIX NUMBER -.----,--'----=1=3~4~9 ______ MIX DESCRIPTION ----~6~-~5'----- TYPE OF CEM~NT -,----=·I=I-------'-___ ;..__ TICKET NUMBER 682141 ,. -.. ADMIXTURE . WRDA 64 SLUMP ---------~4=---=1=/--=2=-'-' __ ' "' > > ., ...... ,\ ' TIME·:·.nt MIXER 9 5. 'MHf-.. · ,i::2 PERCENT AIR -------=-N~/-=-A=-----CO~~ ~ ;E~; --~' ... :_· .... ;~-~0:··. -'.' .. '.'._:.:· .. ~:.".~·-irR·:·T.EMP:~_.;_ .. :.: .. ··, ·--·. -ffo 0 ... :-·-'•d••··· .• -· ·-···-·· -·-----·······.. -----'-----"~---~ · UNIT WEIGHT WET · N/A. .. .... --UNTT 'WEIGHT ·DRY-·_·_· ------=N=/ ..... A=-------'- MIX_ REQUIRED PSI (f'c) .. 4'.00·0 .PS.I·-@ ·is. DA.Ys··. SAMPLES. ~DE BY --~F~. __,B=E=L=T=RAN='--- LOCATION OF PLACEMENT ------=G=R=I=D-=A~-=5---.@-=L=IN=E= .. -=-3~.9=----------------- FIELD LAB IDENTITY NO. 7 49 28 50 28 51 " H . '' '52· .. . ' ~ ,. .. t,·; .\ DATE TESTED 03-12-98 04-02-98 04-02-98 ---. ~ ---. LABORATORY DATA ·· DIMENSIONS INCHES 6 X 1~ 6 X 12 6 X 12 .. --·~ .. •. C _, ... .. ,. - TEST AREA SQ. INCHES 28.27 28.27 28·. 27 .. .. ·-~ : {Al!L SAMPI:I"NG ANp ¼TE~·~ING-PERFORMED ·IN-GENERAL--:ACCORDANCE. WUJI. ASTM TEST METHODS C31, C39,· C78, ens·: C143, C172, C173~ C231, 6617, C1064 · :.-;,";.c::.:·:~ -... MAX LOAD POUNDS 94,000 119,000 118,000 .. . . . . .. ,,_ --.. ·-··- *ACTUAL MEASURED AREA - COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH PSI 3320 4210 4170 .. .. . ... . . "~ ~ .. ' .... , .. .. .... .. ~ .. ~,--·; ............ -... ,. __ ,,_ .. . • j ~. ,"I '... • • • --~ '....... ---• ~ .,.. __ ,_ .LABORATORY DAT~. REMARKS. --'-:·_. ·._· -------------------;"7~~=-~~I:<--'---- DISTRIBUTION: OWNER, ARCHITECT. ENGINEER. CONTRACTOR·. CITY I SUPPLIER. DATE: CHECKED BY: E},Q ~ '* II./~ tf 8', . V REVIEWED DATE: 17150 Via Del Campo Suite 307 San Diego, CA 92127 1-800-487 -0355 . . WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES . , ., ~EPO~T OF COM~RESSION TEST PROJECT LOT 51 CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER PROJECT NO. 97-306 PROJECT ADDRESS 2091 RUTHERFORD ROAD, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR KOLL CdNSTRUCTION ARCHITECT/ENGINEER WARE & MALCOMB ARHC!TECTS/BURKETT & WONG BLDG. PERMIT NO. ~--=9~6~2~0~3~5_,... ______ _ PLAN FILE NO. N/A SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF: ~CONCRETE OMORTAR OGROUT OPRISMS OH/S GROUT O0THER PLACEMENT DATE 03-05-98 -----------"'--~-~--- SUPPLIER---,------------==-----,--=-----=-==......---NELSON SLOAN 1349 MIX NUMBER---------~-=---'~---------- TYPE·OF CEMENT II WRDA 64 ADMIXTURE TIME IN MIXER 90 MIN ----~---==------- CON C •. TEMP 550 DATE RECEIVED IN LAB N/A MIX DESIGN PST 4000 MIX DESCRIPTION N/A TICKET NUMBER 682173 SLUMP 5 1/211 PERCENT AIR N/A AIR TEMP. UNIT WEIGHT WET N/A UNIT WEIGHT DRY ----=N~/=A ____ _ MIX REQUIRED PSI ( f 'c) LOCATION OF PLACEMENT 4000 PSI@ 28 bAYS SAMPLES MADE BY F. BELTRAN FIELD LAB IDENTITY NO. 7 53 28 54 2_8 ~5 H 56 DATE TESTED 03-1~-98 04-02-98-· 04-02-98 GRID. B@ LINE 3.9 (S.O.G) LABORATORY DATA DIMENSIONS INCHES 6 X 1_2 6 X 12 6 X 12 .. TEST AREA SQ. INCHES 28.27 28.27 28.27 MAX LOAD POUNDS 95,000 134,500 127,500 Ali SAMPLING AND TESTING PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANeE WITH ASTM TEST METHODS *ACTUAL MEASURED AREA C31, C39, C78, C138, C143, C172, C173, C231, C617, cfo64 COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH PSI 3360 4760 4510 LABORATORY DATA REMARKS -a.-----------------7'rn'~:lf_~~~~=~~--- DISTRIBU.TION: OWNER, ARCHITECT, ENGINEER, CONTRACTOR, .CITY, SUPPLIER CHECKED BY: 8,/l.?~ -~EVIEWED BY:. DATE: . . 4'-l'-1-'1 &:::~-DATE: '{df--ft WYMAN TESTING LABO·RATORIES . . REPORT OF COMPRESSION·~~ST PROJECT LOT 51 CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER PROJECT NO. 97-306 PROJECT ADDRE~S 2091 RUTHER_FORD ROAD, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR KOLL CONSTRUCTION AACHITECT/ENGINEER WARE & MALCOMB ARHCITECTSIBURKETT & WONG BLDG. PERMI'T NO. 962035 PLAN FILE NO. NIA SAMPL;E DATA REPORT OF: [~CONCRETE OMORTAR OGROUT 0:i?RISMS OH/S GROUT OoTHER PLACEMENT DATE----=:.=.....-:..;::;.._::=-----'- SUPPLIER -------=-==-==-:...-=====--- MIX NUMBER_ ............. -----=;....:..:'-------'------ 03-05-98 NELSON SLOAN 1349· TYPE ·oF CEMENT II ADMIXTURE WRDA 64 44 MIN TIME IN MIXER -----,--=---.........;;;='---;-............. .,...a-- CONC. TEMP NIA DATE RECE:):VED IN MIX DESIGN PSI MIX DESCRIPTION _ TICKET NUMBER SLUMP PERCENT AIR AIR TEMP. UNIT W;i:I_GHT WE'.!' NIA UNIT WEIGHT DRY MIX REQUIRED PSI (f'c) 4000 PSI @ 28 DAYS · SAMPLES MADE BY LAB N/A 4000 6.6 682216 4 1/211 N/A NIA NIA F. BELTRAN · LOCATION OF PLACEMENT ---=G=R=I=D--=:cC__,,._@--'L=I=N:.:.:E=........;3=--· :....:• 9:;;...· _______________ _ FIELD LAB · IDENTITY NO. 7 57 28 58 28 59 H 60 ... DATE TESTED 03-:1,,2-98 04-02-98 04-02..,.98 JJABQRATORY DATA DIMENSIONS INCHES 6 X-i2 6 X 12 x I -, 6 12 -- -- TEST AREA SQ. INCHES 28.27 28.27 28.27 MAX LOAD POUNDS 102,000 127,000 130,000 ;-,', ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE·WITH ASTM TEST METHODS *ACTUAL MEASURED AREA C31, C39, C78, C138, C143, C172, C173, C231, C617, C1O64 DISTRIBUTION: OWNER. ARCHITECT. ENGINEER. CONTRACTOR. CITY, SUPP.LIER CH,ECKED BY: . M 1~ ..---REVIEWED BY: -r DATE: t./--/o_ -? 8: DATE: '{d,-U COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH PSI 3610 4510 4600 17150 Via Del Campo Suite 307 San Diego, CA 92127 1-800-487 -0355 . . WYMAN TESTING LA-BORATORIES REPORT OF COMPRES_SION TEST PRO~ECT LOT 51 CARLSBAD RESEARCH.CENTER PROJECT NO. 97-306 PROJECT ADORESS 2091 RUTHERFORD ROAD, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR KOLL CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT/ENGINEER WARE & MALCOMB ARHCITECTS/BURKETT & WONG BLDG. PERMIT NO. 962035 PLAN FILE NO. N/A SAMPLJ D~TA REPORT OF: . [RI CONCRETE D MORTAR D GROUT D PRISMS DH/ s GROUT D OTHER PLACEMENT DATE 03-05-98 DATE RECEIVED IN LAB N/A SUPPLIER -------'~---=N=E=L=S=O=N-=S=L=O=A=N __ MIX DESIGN PSI 4000 MIX NUMBER -------=1=3-=-4·=9 _____ _ MIX DESCRIPTION 6.5 TYPE OF CEMENT II -----,-~~------,----,---TICKET NUMBER 682282 ADMIXTURE WRDA 64 SLUMP __________ 4=--=1=/~4~'-'-- TIME IN MIXER 60 MIN ----,----'-"--==-~---PERCENT AIR -------=-N~/-=-A=---- CONC. TEMP 65o AIR TEMP. NIA UNIT WEIGHT WET ___ __.N:.:..-,/A=--------UNIT WEIGHT DRY N/A MIX REQUIRED PSI (f'c) 4000 PSI @ 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY ----=-F_,_/--=B=E=L=T=RAN=- LOCATION OF PLACEMENT LINE 3@ GRID J.9 (S.O.G.) FIELD LAB IDENTITY NO. 7 61 28 62 28 63 H 64 DATE TESTED ' ' 03-;l.2-98 04-02-98 04-oi-98 J;.ABORATORY DATA DIMENSIONS INCHES .. 6 X 12 6 X 12 6 X 12 TEST AREA SQ. INCHES 28.27 28.27 28.27 MAX LOAD POUNDS 89,000 119,500 122,000 ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM TEST METHODS *ACTUAL MEASURED AREA C31, C39, C78, C138, C143, C:172, C173, C231, C:617, C1064 DISTRIBUTION: OWNER, ARCHITECT, ENGINE_ER. CONTRACTOR, CITY, SUPPLIER CHECKED B¥: f).1 11c#tx. n1, .. 'f-/L(-</~ --y DATE: REVIEWED BY:- DATE: t/--/C·18 COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH PSI 3150 4230 4310 17150 Via Del Campo Suite 307 San Diego, CA 92127 1-800-487 -0355 . . WYMAN TESTING. LABORATOR·IES REPORT OF CQMPRESSION TEsi PROJECT LOT 51 CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER PROJECT NO. 97-306 PROJECT ADDRESS 2091 RUTHERFORD ROAD, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA CONTRA~TOR KOLL.CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT/ENGINEER WARE & MALCOMB ARHCITECTS/BURKETT & WONG BLDG. PERMIT NO. 962035 PLAN FILE NO. N/A SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF: [Kl CON.CRETE D MORTAR D GROUT D PRISMS DH/ s GROUT D OTHER PLACEMENT DATE SUPPLIER-------=-==-'"-=--====-- MIX NUMBER ------==--a=-=--------~ TYPE OF CEMENT·----=-=-------'--- 03-05-98 NELSON SLOAN 1345 II ADMIXTURE WRDA 64 95 MIN TIME IN MIXER--------=-='--"'='--"------- CONC. TEMP 61° DATE RECEIVED IN LAB NIA MIX DESIGN PSI 4000 MIX DESCRIPTION 6.5 TICKET NUMBER 682342 SLUMP 4 1/2 11 PERCENT AIR N/A AIR TEMP. UNIT WEIGHT WET ---=N~/=A=------UNIT WEIGHT DRY __ _,__=N~/=A=---- MIX REQUIRED PSI (f'c) 4000 PSI @ 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY ---=-F-".-=B=E=L=T=RA=N'--- LOCATION OF PLACEMENT --=L=IN=·=E_2=-:...;.5::::..,-;@"'----'G=R=I=D:c-:H=·~s~· ______________ _ FIELD LAB IDENTITY NO. 7 65 28 66 28 67 H 68 DATE TESTED 03--12"'."98 04-02-98 04-02-98 LABOµTORY DATA DIMENSIONS INCHES 6 ·X 12 6 X 12 6 X 12 TEST AREA SQ. INCHES 28.27 28.27 28.27 MAX LOAD POUNDS 90,500 120,000 123,000 ... ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM TEST METHODS . *ACTUAL ·MEASURED AREA C31, C39, C7~, C138, C143, C172, C173, C231, C617, C1064 . .· LABORATORY DATA REMARKS DISTRIBUTION: OWNER, ARCHITECT, ENGINEER, CONTRACTOR, CITY, SUPPLIER CHECKED BY: Af 1/,.f~ 4-1t,-9rc V DATE: REVIEWE[) BY~ DATE: t/-1<--18 COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH PSI 3200 4240 4350 17150 Via Del Campo Suite 307 San Diego, CA 92127 1-800-487 -0355 WYMAN TE.STING LABORATORIES . . REPORT OF COMPRESSION TEST PROJECT LOT 51 CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER PROJECT NO. 97-306 PROJECT ADDRESS 2091 RUTHERFORD ROAD. CARLSBAD. CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR.. KOLL CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT/ENGINEER WARE & MALCOMB ARHCITECTS/BURKETT & WONG BLDG. PERMIT NO. 962035 PLAN FILE NO. N/A SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF: [filcoNCRETE 0MORTAR 0GRO.UT 0PRISMS OH/S GROUT 0OTHER PLAGEMENT DATE 03-05-98 DATE RECEIVED IN LAB -~3_-_0_6_-~9_8 __ SOPPLIER ________ N=E=L=S_O=N~S-L_O=AN-._ MIX DESIGN PSI 4000 MIX NUMBER -------=1=3~4=9'------"----- TYPE OF CEMENT -----=I=I:..---------- MIX DESCRIPTION ----~6~-~5,__ __ _ TICKET NUMBER 674779 ADMIXTURE WRDA 64 TIME IN MIXER ----~9~0-=M=I=N---_____ _ SLUMP ---------~4=---=1-L~2~'-'-- PERCENT AIR ------=·N-L~A~--- CONC. TEMP 60o AIR TEMP. N/A UNIT WEIGHT WET N/A UNIT WEIGHT DRY MIX REQUIRED PSI (f'c) LOCATION OF PLACEMENT 4000 PSI@ 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY LINE 1.5@ GRID H .FIELD LAB IDENTITY NO. ·- 7 69 28 70 is 71 H 72 DATE TESTED 03-12-~8 04-02-98 04-02-98 LABORATORY DATA DIMENSIONS INCHES - 6 X :12' 6 X 12 6 X 12 TEST AREA SQ. INCHES 28.27 28.27 28.27 MAX LOAD POUNDS 91,000 115,000 120,000 ., ' ALL SAMPLIN.G AND TESTING PERFORMED H~ GENERAL ACCORDANCE• WITH ASTM TEST METHODS *ACTUAL MEASURED AREA C31, C39, C78, C138, C143, C172, C173, C231, C617, C1O64 LABORATORY DATA REMARKS DISTRIBUTION: OWNER. ARCHITECT. ENGINEER. CONTRACTOR. CITY. SUPPLIER CHECKED BY: fi21~ REVIEWED BY:· DATE: If~ I'!~? t DATE: '(,t,-1f N/A F. BELTRAN COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH PSI 3220 4070 4240 .. ' , Wyman . ,· Te$fing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE ·O FIELD WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING 0 SHOTCRETE REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 H. S. BOLTING ONDT D OTHER 1 INSPECTOR OF 0 REINFORCED MASONRY (;] SHOP WELDING 0 D/S ANCHORAGE I -· jJ0 ~fflE~utherford Road NC97-J06 IFORWEEK April ENDING , 10 1¢18 0 '1.tt;ct:0 '!ff~JEt,1cr.t.t1sbac;i Research Center , B~6~~~~~0. I PLAN FILE ~o. cqti~l!-1¥.tH:Bc1n~&te1"&i ~ITECT _ are & Malcomb Architects DESIGN STRENGTH I SOURCE OR MFGR. EN~NEIB_ ·, . . _9s 1-Lo-Torres DESCRIBE MATL (MIX DESIGN, RE~BAA GRADE & MFGR.) G~Jflc~t%ction Astm, a615 gr. 60--cc~i'b~~~~R~g~59::w~eel . LAfvyman Testing Laboratories REINFORCING STEEL INSPECTION 4-7-98 ' Inspected the reinforcing steel for panels ,, 21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,j9,40,41. Inspected reinforcing steel for size, grade, lap, locations and ' clearances. I The following: i,tems require correction: Typical @ all panels: diagonal @ opening_s not 5' long (ALWP-1), missing 1-#5 cont. @ purlin gusset ( 7 & 13/SD-3) bars not 2" clear. Panel #21 1-#5 under door to short, 2-·#,5 to far from the top of the panel, tie H. Bars in the pilaster. Panel #22 missing 3-#5 slab dowels @ pilaster (22/SD2). H. Bar @ top pilaster to short and no tail. Panel 23 missing 3-#5 slab dowels @ pilaster (22/SD-2). Panel 33 missing 1 of the 2-#5 above the main door. -l .J .. _ : ... -'._ ~.-~:: ~-: -~,, ' . -. : ·-, ; . . ' '• ... . r , .,. .. ,-. .. . .. .., '·-'t ; .. , ..... ' . •,' ...... , •". . ~ . .. . -· . . . ; -. -~-. •; ._ -, ...... ,· . . ' ·-' . ~ •, .. : ' . , . '. . ·-' ' -. ,, -. -'. .--: '. ,•' .. . ,_ .. ---. ., ,. '. -·-... ~· -~ . . : . .. . .. ·~ ... . ' . -'. ..• ,' . ' '. CLS 4-14-98 Signed copy on file. Daniel Wyman . . . CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED All OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I· HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS. AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. SIGNAi ORE OF REGISIERED INSPEClbi~ bAtE OF REPOR! REGISI ER NOMBEI< . r 'lj:,, ,.,. - Wyman . ,. Testing · Laboratories (619) 675--0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH O REINFORCED CONCRETE REQUIRED AfJPROVAJ.. BY THE SPECIAL O PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE INSPECTOR OF O REINFORCED MASONRY 0 FIELD WELDING 0 H. S. BOLTING 0 SHOP WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING ONDT tJ D/B ANCHORAGE OSHOTCRETE 0 OTHER JO C & concre e ories CONCRETE INSPECTJON 4-22-98 A.Inspected the placement and consolidation of 50 cubic yards of Concrete into wall panel numbers 50, 51, 9; and 4 stairway panels On west of line 7, between E.75. & E, whose r~bars were inspected Per· 9/SD.1. B. One set of 5 test cylinders (6"x12") was taken from the Concrete load delivered by truck #601, ticket #691997, Whose slump was 4-1/2", and was placed in top½ of panel# 50, and bottom left 1/8 of panel #51. A photocopy of the Engineer's approved concrete mix design is attached. C. To the best of my knowledge, the work inspected is in accordance with the approved plans and specifications, and the applicable workmanship provisions of UBC. CLS 4-28-98 Signed copy on file. Hossein F. Sarkani CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HERESY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. .-----s,G-N~A~ro-R~e-o...,F ,-~w...,,,...,.s1=eR=ED""J!ulN$:!'trpEi:?C'!T1IO~rr~ DATE oF REPoRI Wym.an . ,· Te$fing . Laboratories (619) 675·-0210 : COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH O REINFORCED CONCRETE i REQUIRED Af'PROVAL BY THE SPECIAL O PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE INSPECTOR OF O REINFORCED MASONRY tJ FIELD WELDING 0 H. S. BOLTING ·o SHOP WELDING JO No.97-306 oes Center & concre e SOURCEORMF19e son Slo DESCRIBE MArL (MIX DESIGN. RE-BAA GRADE &. MFGR.) LAB CONCRETE INSPECTION 4-21-98 0 FIREPROOFING ONDT 0 D/B ANCHORAGE FORWEEK Aprl 4 ENDING . o. ories 0 SHOTCRETE O0THER 98 19 A. Inspected the placement and consolidation of 238.0 cubic yards of concrete in the s.o.g. located between lines 2.5, 1, A.2, ·& F.3, excluding the 3' wide pour strip continuous along perimeter of building. (at · West & south of today's s.o.g. section); and the 8'x57' pour strip (blocked out) section at panels 50 & 51 location between D.5/2 & C.5/2. B. ·Two sets of 4 test cylinders (6"x12")were taken with the following records·: Set# truck# ticket# slump(in) approximate location 1 345 691525 5-1/2" between e.5/1, e.25/1, e.5/2~5, & e25/2.5. 2 332 691659 4" Between c.75/2.5, c.25/2.5, c.75/2.1 & C.25/2.1. The 5-1/2" slump of 1st set of samples was reported to the contractor & correction was made for the rest of concrete delivered to project site today. C. To the best of my knowledge, the work inspected is in accordance with approved plans and specifications, except as noted on section "B~' of this report. · D. Please Note: The discrepancies as was listed on section B of reinforcing steel · inspection· repm:·t of 4-20-98 on panels 9 50~ & 51 were corrected and the info/clarification was obtained from the Engineer and is attached to this report. The Engineer has clarified that detail 14/SD-3 shall apply at each face Of panels 50 & 51 at their joint on line D (not 14/SD-2 as was shown on appr<?ved panels) , and are tnspectE?d & ve.rif ied accordingly. CLS 4-28-98 Signed copy on file. Hossein F. Sarkani CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY .THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. ----,.,s1..,....G...,.NA,...,t-r11ur=~e"?o..,..F""'RE-.,.G.,.,,iS=1emRe:r10:n.1Nr<:iSP~E~CTttO'.ml'.l,.--- DATE OF REPOi"H REGIS! EU NOivfS'ET< I ' Wyman . , . . Testing · Laboratories (619) 675--0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 FIELD WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING OSHOTCRETE REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 H. S. BOLTING ONDT O0THER INSPECTOR OF 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 SHOP WELDING 0 D/8 ANCHORAGE 10"· .. ~~cssRUtherrord Road No.97-306 IFoAweeK April 24 l;s ENDING . JWJl,!G oR ew~e had Kesearch Center e~ e~. I PLAN FILE ~o. :::oM·~-1~.'.!":r&cril!it.fG!iACgmc.~u re.oars AACW~ & Malcomo Arcnitects ·:>ESIGN STRENGTH I SOURCE OR MFGR. eN~fflli-Lo-..Torres · vESCAIBE MArL (MIX DESIGN. RE·BAA GRADE & MFGR.) Ge~g;;offi!m~uction .... COt\lJ'ij.\if>91~ - LABWyman Testing Laooratories REINFORCING STEEL INSPECTION 4-20-98 A.In$pected reinforcing ste.el for size, grade, lap, locations and clearances at the following locations: 1. the 5-1/2" s.o.g. located between lines 2.5 & 1 and A. 2 & F.3 (app.r:oximates). 2. Wall panel numbers: 9, 50 & 51. -. B. The following discrepancies were noted & brought up to the attention -of the Contractor for correction: 1. Panel #9 is missing the embed ·plate (pl3/4"x8"x26" W/88 #8 @ 3-1/2 GA per detail _15/SD-3) at location shown on panel elev. On sheet WP-2. 2. Some of #4 ties at 6" o.c. spacings on either end of panels #50, and #51 (per detail Q/WP-1 & panel elev. Ori sheet WP-4) do not have the 135 ~egree as shown on column ties detail 1/SD-1. 3. Additionally requested for info/clarification on chord tie connections for 6 #8 rebars at the roof line between. panels 50 & 51; the approved plans' sheet WP-4 indicated detail 14/SD-2 which may not be applicable between these panels at above location. C. To the best of my knowledge, accordance with approved plans and noted on section B ·of this report. CLS 4-28-98 Signed copy on file. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE the work inspected is in specifications, except as Hossein F. Sarkani ---I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS. AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. ----,s=,G~N~A....,.IU-RE...,o~F-RE,..,..G.,.,..is.,.,..IE""'RE,....omtNr<:!tsPn::iECMl~b~R DAIE OF REPOtn ' ' Wyman . Testing ,. · Laboratories (619) 675--0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH O REINFORCED CONCRETE REQUIRED AfJPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL O PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE INSPECTOR OF . 0 REINFORCED MASONRY - 0 FIELD WELDING 0 H. S. BOLTING 0 SHOP WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING O SHOTCRETE 0 NDT O0THER 0 0/8 ANCHORAGE JO N0~7-306 98 19 Center concre e AA~ & SOURCEORMNe son Slo N<M~FJ..:1..-Lo-. orres DESCRIBE MATL (MIX DESIGN. RE-BAA GAAOE &. MFGR.) WORK LA!Wyman es ing ories CONCREIB INSPECTION 4-20-98 a. Please Note: The reinforcing steel installations were reinspected for discrepancies as noted o·n section 3 of 4-18-98 special inspector report by Stephen Flores. Verified that corrections were made for all the panels listed #'s 7 , 8 i 1 7 , 18 , & 2·0 . B. Inspected the placement and consolidation of 250 cubic yards of Concrete into the following wall panels:·· · ~umbers: 7,8,10,ll,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24; and screen wall panel #'s S4, S5, And S6. C. Two sets of 5 test cylinders ( 6"x12") were taken with the following records: Set# 1 2 truck# 619 306 ticket# 691°150 691284 slump (in) 4-3/4" 5'~ approximate locations:· top½ of P #11 & bot. ½ of p #10. rt. ¼ of p #18 & bot. ½ of p #16 D. To the best of my knowledge, accordance with approved plans and workmanship provisions of UBC. the work inspected is in specifications, applicable CLS 4-28-98 Signed copy on file. Hossein F. Sarkani -· CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS. AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. ------~s-1G=N-A-IO-RE-o""·F-uE.,,...G.,,.,ISf""'Ef~"'"'ED,...,l""Ns:!l:l"pft:7C"Tif0~l~-r bAIE OF REPORf AEGiSIEH NUM8E<°" •> A.- Wyman Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 FIELD WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING 0 SHOTCRETE REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 H. S. BOLTING D NDT D OTHER INSPECTOR OF 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 SHOP WELDING 0 D/B ANCHORAGE J~ l>.""~"Ettut.nerrora Roaa No:37-306 I FOR WEEK April 24 1998 ENDING O.1MSl!m 09 lfl<PJ . ·~naa Research Center . BL(9~~13'§). I PLAN FILE NO . -- ,u,1 ~-~E. G!{,P:e. EU.:..D 1 .:WUU psi A615 ARfl~ & Malcomb Architects Di.tla;ll)l tlrR@Sil:t I SOURCE OR MFGR. EN~i-Lo-Torres DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN. RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) GE~tJ;::Of::loo~guction CO~Tl<R>.O1rHui§MM WORK . .,.~ LAEWyman Testing Laboratories .-.. -,.· .. CONCRETE INSPECTION 4-18-98 Inspection the placement of 300 cubic yards of ASTM C150 type II 3,000 psi concrete at panels 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 42, and at the screen wall panels Sl, S2, S3, Rl, R2 and at 6 trash enclosure panels. 3 sets of test cylinders were made 5 each set, Set #1, 4 II slump. Set #2, 5" slump. Set #3, 4-3/4" slump. Inspection was continuous and work complies with the approved plans and specifications. CLS 4-29-98 Signed copy on file. Stephen Flores CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS. AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. SIGNATURE OF REGISfERED INSPECTOR DATE OF REPORT REGISTER_ NUMBER Wyman Testing · Laboratories (619) 675-0270 .. COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH O REINFORCED CONCRETE O FIELD WELDING REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL O PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE . 0 H. S. BOLTING INSPECTOR OF O REINFORCED MASONRY O SHOP WELDING N~7-3Q6 0 FIREPROOFING D NDT 0 D/B ANCHORAGE FORWEEK April 24 ENDING PLAN FILE NO. AR~ & Ma co Architects .DESIGN STRENGTH SOURCE OR MFGR . EN~!3$ 1.-Lo-Torreq DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN, RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) C WORK LA yrnan es oratories CONCRETE INSPECTION 4-18-98 0 SHOTCRETE 0 OTHER l, Inspected the placement of A615 reinforcing steel at the following panels 7,8,10,ll,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20.· 2. T~e placement of A615 #3,5,6,7,#4 reinforcing steel at panels 10,11,12,13,14,15,16,19, per details D/wp-1, 8/SD-3, 10/SD3, 8/SD6, 8/SD-4, 7/SD-3, 9/SD-3, 12/SD-2, 10/SD-2 and typical bar spacing per sheet 11/SD-1 complies with the approved plans and specifications. 3. The . following panels do not comply with the approved and specifications. 1. Panels 7 & 8 #5 bar missing at anchor bolts per 8/SD-4, #3 ties not tied in place, chord bars at wrong elevation. 2. panels 1 7 & 18 pilasters have #3 ties at wrong spacing and vertical steel #4-#7 each are to short. 3. Panel 20-1-#5 bar missing along left edge. Inspection was periodic and work complies with the approved plans ?nd specifications. Except for panels 7,8,17, 18, 20. CLS 4-29-98 Signed copy on file. Stephen Flores CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. SIGNATURE OF REGISTERED INSPECToR DATE OF REPORI REGISTER NUMBER Wyman . Testing ,· · Laboratories (619) 675-0270 0 FIREPROOFING 0NDT COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH O REINFORCED CONCRETE REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL O PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE INSPECTOR OF O REINFORCED MASONRY . 0 FIELD WELDING 0 H. S. BOLTING 0 SHOP WELDING 0 0/B ANCHORAGE Joa~QJ:911SS Rutherford Road No.97-306 IFORWEEK April ENDING . AA<:ffiiife & Malcomb Arch~tects I souRcE ~"§6-n/ Sloan EN~§hi-Lo-Torres DESCRIBE MArL (MIX DESIGN, RE-BAA GRADE & MFGR.) Concrete mix #6,552 lASWyman Testing Laboratories CONCRETE INSPECTION 4-17-98 A. Inspected the placement and consolidation of 285.50 cubic yards of concrete into the following pan~ls: Numbers: 6,5,4,3,2,1; 49,48,47,46,45,44,43; 41,40, and 39; For a Total of 16 panels, and one 7'xll'x6" thick trash enclosure panel. B. 3 sets of 5 test cylinders (6"xl2") were taken with the Following records: Set# truck# ticket# 1 361 690560 2 334 690674 3 332 690774 slump (in) 5" 4" 4-1/2" locations(approximate) left 1/3 of panel #4. right 1/3 of panel #45. bottom 1/3 of panel #41. Note 1: one additional test cylinder per set was taken per contractors request for compressive strength testing at 5 days. Note 2: each set of test cylinders were taken for every 125 cubic Yards of concrete placed today; in accordance with project specifications. Set #3 was taken for fraction there of last 125 cubic yards. 17 0SHOTCRETE D OTHER C. To the best of my knowledge, the work inspected is in accordance with the approved plans & specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of UBC. CLS 4-23-98 _Signed copy on file. Hossein F. Sarkani CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS. AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. ·. SIGNAIURE OF REGISTERED INSPECibf.l DATE OF REPORf R~GiSlEI? NOMBElr I I Wyman . Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH O REINFORCED CONCRETE REQUIRED APPROVAL.BY THE SPECIAL O PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE INSPECTOR OF O REINFORCED MASONRY Jo~']_E~utherford Road ' 0 FIELD WELDING 0 H; S: BOLTING 0 SHOP WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING 0NDT 0 0/B ANCHORAGE B~ ~§..~5 ~3· I PLAN FILE NO. AAcmr.f~ & Malcomb Architects ::>ESIGN STRENGTH I SOURCE OR MFGR. EN~6E'@hi-Lo.__Torres DESCRIBE MATL (MIX DESIGN, RE•BAR GRADE & MFGR.) Astm A615 gr. 6Q co~~OING REPORTED WORK LABWyman Testing Laboratories REINFORCING STEEL INSPECTION 4-16-98 Inspected the reinforcing steel for #1,2,3,4,5,6,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49. 0SHOTCRETE 0 OTHER panel Inspected reinforcing steel for size, grade, lap, location-; and clearances. Following items require correction: Panel 5 missing 2 #5 vert. T & B & line F.5 & pilaster.panel 43 & 45 missing 2 ties@ top of pilaster (l/8D3) and bars riot clear@ top of pilaster. CLS 4-22-98 Signed copy on file. Daniel Wyman CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT i HAVE INSPECTED All OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. SIGNAT@E OF REGISTERED INSPECIOR DATE OF REPORf REGISIW NOMBEI< Wyman . Testing ,. · Laboratories (619) 675·-0210 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 FIELD WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING OSHOTCRETE REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 H. S. BOLTING 0 NDT D OTHER INSPECTOR OF 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 SHOP WELDING 0 0/8 ANCHORAGE JOBZ@~~ss.R.utherford Road NO.97-306 IFoRweeK April ENDING ' 17 · 1998 Ow.tf~R!l~qJE't!~~fsbad Research Center BI.D§-E5'i~Tj§>. I PLAN FILE ~o. CONSTR. MATL (TYPE. GRADE. ETC.) AACWR'FJ & Malcomb Architects OE~~ psi .1 SOURCE OR MFGR. EN~filii-Lo..;.Torres DESCRIBE MATL (MIX DESIGN. RE~SAA GRADE & MFGR.) GE~~f0 ~%ffuction Rebars A615 gr.,60, concrete mix #575 CONTR. DOING REPORTED WORK LA9wyman Testing Laboratories CONCRETE INSPECTION 4-11-98 Inspected the reinforcing steel installation for wall and column Footing on the grid line 1 between grid lines B-G per details #11.on the sheet SD-1 and #1 on the sheet SD-2. Steel is ok. Inspected the placement and consolidation of 67 cubic yards. of concrete, niix design #515 for installing these concrete · structures in place. Slump was 5". One set of four concrete samples was taken from truck #343, ticket #689594. Work inspected is in accordance with approved plans and structural notes. Time in: 6:00 am Time out: 11:30 am Interim typed report for reference -qriginal handwritten daily on file. Signed copy to be forwarded in final report. CLS 4-23-98 Signed copy on file. Leon Veitzman ·-. . . - CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE SIGNATURE OF REGISIERED iNSPECloi~ I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS. AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. DAIE OF REPORI -· • t!EGIS!W NOMSE!r" Wyman Testing Laboratories COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH O REINFORCED CONCRETE O FIELD WELDING , REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL O PRE-STRESSED COt,,JCRETE O H.S. BOLTING INSPECTOR OF O REINFORCED MASONRY O SHOP WELDING Of.SCRIBE; MAT'L (MIX DESIGN, RE-BAA GRADE & MFGR. (619) 675-0270 0 FIREPROOFING O SHOTCRETE 0 NDT ~ OTHER 0 D/8 ANCHORAGE Rott! ""'L.t~ INSP 1N DATE LOCATIONS OF WORK INSPECTED. TEST SAMPLES TAKEN, ETC .. Includes Information about amounts of material placed or work performed; number, fype, and Identity numbers oftest samples taken; structural connections (welds, h.t. bolts torques) checked; etc. NONE COMPLIANCE -..., • .,jr APPROVAL SIGm.T-TIME IN: TIME OUT: PRINTED NAME: INSPECTOR CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS. 1:00AM Testing Engineers • San Diego, Inc. 7895 CONVOY CT., SUITE 18 SAN DIEGO, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT (;Sal/ Page _1 _of_)_ Project Name --""'"---'-'...::=-"""---'-'=~--"==----'=c.c:;..---",---=---1----==;::..,=----'-----TESD Project# _9_//._:?o.___;;~..:::;__ __ Address BuilEling Permit# ---1--==---c....--=--=-------DSA # _______________ _ Plan File# ________________ _ . OSHPD # ______________ _ Government Contract# ___________ _ Other ________________ _ INSPECTION MAT'L SAMPLING QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION ___ Concrete __ ._Soil --__ Cone.: Mix #/psi __ Prestress Cone __ Base --__ . _ Cone.: Mix #/psi Masonry __ Subgrade --__ Cone.: Mix #/psi ~ Struct Sieel ' __ Asphalt Concrete ____ Rini.: Rebar ---- _-_ Fireproofing ___ Concrete Cylinders --__ Rinf.: W.W.F. __ Pile ·Driving __ Cone Flex Beams --____ --Rini.: Tendons __ Non-Destructive __ Reinf. Steel __ Grout: Mix #/psi ___ Batch Plant __ Tendon-(PT Strands) ___ __ Mortar: Type/psi --Soils Technician __ Mortar Samples --__ Units: Block --Mechanical __ Grout Samples __ Units: Block --Electrical __ Masonry Prisms --__ Steel --Bolt Pull-Out __ Masonry Block --· __ H.S. Bolts __ Roofing --Steel --Metal Decking ,1 __ Waterproofing __ H.S. Bolts ----Z' Electrodes {;;.Jc,/ S(c:.1 r , --DSA __ Fireproofing --____ Fireproofing __ OSHPD __ Roofing --__ Other __ Specialty __ Other -- INSPECTOR'S NAME -~-'--"':::::..,,,e..-,-,,..~~~,;:;-r:--::,;-,--,--'U------- INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE~----...·~-,-_,--,-_ ---.c--------- IN~TION CHECKLIST- ~ns ~ecifications __ Sizes __ Slump __ Air Content ~emperature __ Unit Weight __ Consolidation ~ctrode Storage __ __ Torque Applied __ Load (Pounds) V Thickness 1 _ WPS+WGe s :..fl__ -- __ Correclive action required __ __ Corrections completed __ • .. ~ .J PROJECT Testing Engineers -San Ciego1 Inc. Ealabllahll(I 1946 7895 CONVOY CT., SUITE 18 SAN DIEGO, CA92111 (619) 715-5800 FAX (619) 715-5810: REPORT· OF-COMPRESSION TEST . . . LOT 51 CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER PROJECT NO. PROJECT ADDRESS '\.2.09-!RUTHERFORD ROAD, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA ATLANTIC CllY RAHWAY FT. LAUDERDALE ORLANDO ---1 :·: I N fsAN DIEGO .i ,J f'\L 97-306 CONTRACTOR ..... --~---=K=O=L=L=--=C=O=-N=S'-=T=R=U'-"C'-=T=I'""'O"""N _____________________ _ ARCHITECT/ENGINEER WARE & MALCOMB ARHCITECTS/BURKETT & WONG BLDG. PERM;IT NO. 962035 PLAN FILE NO. N/A SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF: [[] CONCRETE D MORTAR D GROUT D PRISMS DH/ s GROUT D OTHER PLACEMENT DATE 05-08-98 DATE RECEIVED IN LAB --'-0~5_-~1=1~-~9~8 __ SUPPLIER -------=-N=E=L=S'-"O=N.a......:S=L~O=AN=---MIX DESIGN PSI 4000 MIX NUMBER --------'8=9~--=1~4=1 ______ _ MIX DESCRIPTION 7.5 SK TYPE OF CEMENT .II .V TICKET NUMBER 696800 ADMIXTURE WRDA 64 & DARVAIR SLUMP -~·---------=3--=l~L~2~"--- TIME IN ~IXER ----=1~4=2~M==IN::;.:.._ __ _ PERCENT AIR _______ 4-=-=-·=0~% ___ _ CONC-. TEMP 69° AIR TEMP. UNIT WEIGHT WET 144.9. UNIT WEIGHT DRY N/A MIX .REQUIRED PSI (f'c) 4000 PSI @ 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY H. SARKANI LOCATION OF PLACEMENT 4=~~M"N°BER~GkB-eo1:~UMNs™X'fl""'E-s-:E'BE--@F-BbBG--A~--hFFR®X FIELD LAB IDENTITY NO. 7 130 28 131 28 132 H 133 DATE TESTED 05-15_-98 06-05-98 06-05-98 ~GRI-J:>-.r>.Pl)rNT-J:'!":"7:5-,,/•l.,....,mr.w7z5r/..-,1...,,.-=1).,,.~4-/_l-AN-B.,..Bi''1 • LABORATORY DATA DIMENSIONS INCHES 6 X 12 6 X 12 6 X 12 TEST AREA SQ. INCHES 28.2°7 28.27 28.27 MAX LOAD POUNDS 131,500 153,000 156,000 ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE ·WITH ASTM TEST METHODS *ACTUAL MEASURED AREA C31, C39, C78, C138, C143, C172, C1.73, C231, C617, C1064 LABORATORY DATA REMARKS DISTRIBUTION: OWNER, ARCHITECT, ENGINEER, CONTRACTOR, CITY, SUPPLIER CHECKED· BY: /t C«~ DATE: REVIEWED B • ~ DATE: (_:_2>~ OVER 50 YEARS OF QUALITY SERVICE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH PSI 4650 5410 ~,§-2-0' Wyman Testing Laboratories COVERING WORK PERFORMEQ WHICH O REINFORCED CONCRETE O FIELD WELDING REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL O PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE O H.S. BOLTING INSPECTOR OF O REINFORCED MASONRY O SHOP WELDING (619) 675-0270 0 FIREPROOFING O SHOTCRETE D NOT D OTHER ~ D/B ANCHORAGE FOR WEEK ENDING PLAN FILE NO. INSP1N DATE LOCATIONS OF WORK INSPECTED, TEST SAMPLES TAKEN, ETC., includes information about amounts of materiaLplaced or work performed; number, type,anc:I identity numbers of test samples taken; structural connections (welds, h.t. bolts torques) checked; etc. NONE COMPLIANCE TIME IN: TIME OUT: PRINTED NAME: +i?r/4.A(l;{) tf'ofPM? INSPECTOR CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS. /.2,: 00 NOON ) l1Qt0 l Ho&;ti,t..J E. ~ \ Wyman _ Testing Laboratories/ COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH O REINFORCED CONCRETE ~ FIELD WELDING REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL O PREsSTRESSED CONCRETE O H.S. BOLTING INSPECTOR OF O REINFORCED MASONRY O SHOP WEWING (619) 675-0270 0 FIREPROOFING O SHOTCRETE D NDT D OTHER 0 D/B ANCHORAGE FOR WEEK ENDING PLAN FILE NO. INSP 1N DATE LOCATIONS OF WORK INSPECTED, TEST SAMPLES TAKEN, ETC., includes information about amounts of material placed or work performed; number, type, and identity numbers of test samples taken; structural connections (welds, h.t. bolts torques) checked; etc. TIME OUT: PRINTED NAME: INSPECTOR CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY T.HAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS · OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS. •J Wyman Testing Laboratories/ COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH O REINFORCED CONCRETE O FIELD WEtDING REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL O PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE O H.S. BOLTING INSPfi:CTOR OF O REINFORCED MASONRY 0SHOP WELDING DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN, RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR. SHEATI-\1 (619) 675-0270 0 FIREPROOFING O SHOTCRETE 0 NDT ~ OTHER 0 D/B ANCHORAGE 'Roo F ~\Ll INSP'N DATE LOCATIONS OF W0RK INSPECTED, TEST SAMPLES TAKEN, ETC., includes information about amounts of material placed or work performed; number, type, and identity-numbers of test samples taken; structural connections (welds, h.t. bolts torques) checked; etc. C. NONE COMPLIANCE TIME IN: TIME OUT: PRINTED NAME: INSPECTOR CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS. . 1!00AM Wyman Testing -Laboratories COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH O REINFORCED CONCRETE O FIELD WELDING REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL O PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE O H.S. BOLTING INSPECTOR OF O REINFORCED MASONRY O SHOP WELDING (619) 675-0270 0 FIREPROOFING O SHOTCRETE D NDT D OTHER ~ D/B ANCHORAGE~ EPc'i,.f 8"Q;S INSP'N DATE LOCATIONS OF WORK INSPECTED, TEST SAMPLES TAKEN; ETC., includes information about amounts of material placed or work performed; number, type, and identily numbers of test samples taken; structural connections (welds, h.t. bolts torques) checked; etc. TIME IN: TIME OUT: PRINTED NAME: INSPECTOR CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS. . 720 Wyman Testing . . Laboratories/ COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH O REINFORCED CONCRETE Kl FIELD WELDING REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL O PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE O H.S. BOLTING INSPECTOR OF . 0 REINFORCED MASONRY O SHOP WELDING (619) 675-0270 0 FIREPROOFING O SHOTCRETE D NDT D OTHER 0 D/B ANCHORAGE PLAN FILE NO. INSP 1N DATE LOCATIONS OF WORK INSPECTED, TEST SAMP_LES TAKEN, ETC., includes information about amounts of material placed or work performed; number, type, and identity numbers of test samples taken; structural connections (welds, h.t. bolts torques) checked; etc. NONE COMPLIANCE APPROVAL SI PRINTED NAME: CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE TIME IN: TIME OUT: INSPECTOR I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED It HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS, . . Wyman Testing Laboratories/ COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH O REINFORCED CONCRETE :Mt FIELD WELDING REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL O PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE O H.S. BOLTING INSPECTOR OF O REINFORCED MASONRY O SHOP WELDING (619) 675-0270 0 FIREPROOFING O SHOTCRETE D NOT D OTHER 0 D/B ANCHORAGE PLAN FILE NO. INSP1N DATE LOCATIONS OF WORK INSPECTED, TEST SAMPLES TAKEN, ETC., includes information about amounts of material placed or work performed; number, type, and identity numbers of test samples taken; structural connections (welds, h.t. bolts torques) checked; etc. APPROVAL S PRINTED NAME: CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE NONE COMPLIANCE TIME IN: TIME OUT: INSPECTOR I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS. G,u~~ 1NSPEc1u1< 102#'/I-BS l<EGISIEI< NOMBEH ·wyman Testing Laboratories/ COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH O REINFORCED CONCRETE . gf FIELD WELDING REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL. 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE O H.S. BOLTING INSPECTOR OF O REINFORCED MASONRY O SHOP WELDING · DESIGN STRENGTH ·ENGINEER GENERAL CONTRACTOR (619) 675-0270 0 FIREPROOFING O SHOTCRETE D NDT D OTHER 0 D/B ANCHORAGE FOR WEEK ENDING PLAN FILE NO. INSP 1N DATE LOCATIONS OF WORK INSPECTED, TEST SAMPLES TAKEN, ETC., includes information about amounts of material placed or work performed; number, type, ar:1d identity numbers of test samples taken; structural connections (welds, h.t. bolts t9rques) checked; etc. APPROVAL PRINTED NAME: CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE TIME IN: TIME OUT: INSPECTOR I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS. ,~ Wyman Testing Laboratories/ COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH O REINFORCED CONCRETE ~ FIELD WELDING REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL O PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE O H.S. BOLTING INSPECTOR OF O REINFORCED MASONRY tJ SHOP WELDING (619) 675-0270 0 FIREPROOFING O SHOTCRETE D NOT D OTHER 0 D/B ANCHORAGE FOR WEEK ENDING ~ PLAN FILE NO. INSP 1N DATE LOCATIONS OF WORK INSPECTED, TEST SAMPLES TAKEN, ETC., includes information about amounts of material placed or work performed; number, 1ype, and identify numbers of test samples taken; structural connections (welds, h.t. bolts APPROVAL SIG P.RINTED NAME: torques) checked; etc. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE NONE COMPLIANCE TIME IN: TIME OUT: INSPECTOR I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE ·INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS. Wyman Testing Laboratories COVERING WQRK PERFORMED WHICH ~ REINFORCED CONCRETE O FIELD WELDING REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL O PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE O H.S. BOLTING INSPECTOR OF O REINFORCED MASONRY O SHOP WELDING NO. 3300 . . (619) 675-0270 0 FIREPROOFING O SHOTCRETE D NDT D OTHER 0 D/B ANCHORAGE FOR WEEK ENDING INSP'N DATE LOCATIONS OF WORK INSPECTED, TEST SAMPLES TAKEN, ETC., includes information about amounts of material placed or work performed; number, type, and identity numbers of test samples taken; structural connections (welds, h.t. bolts APPROVAL PRINTED NAME: torques) checked; etc. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE TIME OUT: INSPECTOR I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS. IOU'/iO-BB l?EGISIEI< l\!DMBEI< \ \ Wyman Testing Laboratories / COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH RI REINFORCED CONCRETE O FIELD WELDING REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL O PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE O H.S. BOLTING INSPECTOR OF O REINFORCED MASONRY O SHOP WELDING NO. 'l7-3ol> BLDG. PE~lt NO. . . 'Tc. -..2-035' ARCHITECT ENGINEER GENERAL CONTRACTOR CONTR. DOING REPORTED (619) 675-0270 0 FIREPROOFING O SHOTCRETE D NDT D OTHER 0 D/8 ANCHORAGE FOR WEEK ENDING PLAN FILE NO • INSP 1N DATE LOCATIONS OF WORK INSPECTED, TEST SAMPLES TAKEN, ETC., includes information about amounts of material placed or work performed; number, type, and identity numbers of test samples taken; structural connections (welds, h.t. bolts . torques) checked; etc. TIME IN: TIME OUT: PRINTED NAME: INSPECTOR CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE rOUND THIS WORK TO COMPlY WITH THE-APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS. . • -==~ " Wyman Testing Laboratories COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH O REINFORCED CONCRETE ~ FIELD WELDING REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL O PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE O H.S. BOLTING INSPECTOR OF [] REINFORCED MASONRY O SHOP WELDING TIME OUT: PRINTED NAME: INSPECTOR CERTlflCATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS. (619) 675-0270 __ 0 FIREPROOFING O SHOTCRETE D NOT D OTHER 0 D/B ANCHORAGE /02.'11-t.f0-85 l<EGISI Eh! l\lUMBEI< . "·--~ Testing Engi~ ars -San Diego, Inc~ · ·- 3467 KURTZ STREET O FIELD REPORT Page_j_ of Z.. SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 9211 O ...01,JOTICE TO COMPLY Date 6--5 -9? _ Job Numb Permit Number Plan File Number TO;---'----,..-----------'--- Testing Engi('"'·ars -San Diego; Inc.~ ·-Page Z of 2 3467 KURTZ STREET O FIELD REPORT SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92110 . ~OTICE TO COMPLY . Date b ,,.7 .,. ? 8 Job Nu ', $-t) Permit Number Plan File Number TO: --------'----------- /JO 153 Address Testing Engineers • San Diego, Inc. / 7895 CONVOY CT., SUITE 18 SAN DIEGO, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page _1 _of __ ttJ/51 ' Wyl1MI'/ "FESB-Project # __ 9_7_.,,_3_~~6 __ _ General/ Subcontractor ·-'---~,____._..e.----~--+--~~----___,,,,__ __________________ _ Building Permit # Plan File#---~-------------OSHPD # ______________ _ Government Contract# ____________ _ Other --"----------------- INSPECTION MAT'L SAMPLING QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION INSPECTION CHECKLIST __ Concrete --Soil --_____ Cone.: Mix #/psi ./ Plans __ Prestress Cone --Base --_. _ Coric.: Mix #/psi _L__ Specifications __ Masonry _·_ Subgrade -·--____ Cone.: Mix #/psi __ Sizes __ StructSteel __ Asphalt Concrete --__ Rini.: Rebar __ Slump _. _ Fireproofing -. __ Concrete Cylinders --__ Rini.: W.W.F. __ Air Content __ Pile Driving ___ Co,nc Flex Beams ---. __ Rini.: Tendons __ Temperature __ Non-Destructive __ Rein!. Steel --__ . _ Grout: Mix #/psi. __ Unit Weight __ Batch Plant __ Tendon (PT Strands) __ ._ __ Mortar: Type/psi _· __ Consolidation __ Soils Technician __ Mortar Samplei:; --____ Units: Block __ Electrode Storage __ Mechanical __ Grout Samples --__ Units: Block __ Torque Applied __ Electrical __ Masonry Prisms --___ ._ Steel __ Load (Pounds) _._ Bolt Pull-Out __ Masonry Block --__ H.S. Bolts __ Thickness _L Roofing __ Steel --____ Metal Decking -- __ Waterproofing __ H.S.Bolts --__ Electrodes -- --DSA __ Fireproofirig __ Fireproofing -- __ .OSHPD __ Roofing --__ Other __ Corrective action required __ ___ Specialty __ Other --__ Corrections completed __ Field Representative ________________ _ CERTIFICATiONOF COMPLIANCE: To the best of my knowledge,all of the reported work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. INSPECTOR'S NAME c;l,,ri ~a INSPECTOR'SSIGNATURE ~ CERT. NO . ...,..;£ __ /f~tJ~t/_/_7~3~- DATE _6 __ /_9 __ /J-'-9-=8-• 7 \ Testing Engineers -S~n CJiego1 Inc. Eatabll•he;d 1~ . 7895 CONVOY CT., SUITE 18 SAN DIEGO, CA 92111 (619) 715-5800 . FA)<-(619) 715-5810. REPORT OF COMPRESSION ~EST PROJECT LOT 51 CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER PROJECT NO. PROJECT ADDRESS 2091 RUTHERFORD ROAD, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR . KOLL CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT/ENGINEER WARE & MALCOMB ARHCITECTS/BURKETT & WONG BLDG. PERMIT NO. 962035 PLAN FILE NO. SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF: N/A (fil CONCRETE D MORTAR D GROUT D PRISMS D H/S GROUT D OTHER ATLANTIC CllY RAHWAY FT. LAUDERDALE ORLANDO SANDIEGO PLACEMENT DATE 05-22-98 DATE RECEIVED IN LAB 05-20-98 SUPPLIER ------~N=E=L=S-O~N.....,.....S~L~O=AN~-MIX DESIGN PSI 4000 MIX NUMBER ---'----'---::::6~--1=3~4=9 ____ _ MIX DESCRIPTION 6.6 SK/FLYASH TYPE OF CEMENT II TICKET NUMBER 699811 ADMIXTURE WRDA 64 .SLUMP 5 11 TIME IN MIXER 82 MIN.· PERCENT AIR 2.0% CONC. TEMP 66° AIR TEMP. 57° UNIT WEIGHT WET ---'---'-"--'---=1~4~7~.=2~------UNIT WEIGHT DRY N/A MIX REQUIRED PSI (f'c) 4000 PSI @ 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY H. SARKANI LOCATION OF PLACEMENT THE 3FT WIDE POUR STRIP ALONG LINE 7 FROM LINE E.35 /7, E.35/6.6, E.65/7, E.65/6.6. FIELD LAB IDENTITY NO. 7 134 28 135 .. 28 136 .. H 137 -- 'DATE TESTED 05-29-98 06-19-98 06-19-98 ·--. LABOR.1\TORY DATA DIMENSIONS INCHES 6 X 12 6 X 12 6 X 14 -· .. TEST AREA SQ. INCHES 28.27 28.27 28.27 -.. . - . .. ~ . -.. MAX LOAD POUNDS 75,500 12~,500 130,000 ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE YITH ASTM TEST METHODS *ACTUAL MEASURED AREA C31, C39, C78, C138-, C143, C172, err.~, ·c231, C617, C1064 COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH PSI 2780 4550 4600 . LABO~TORY DATA REMARKS--'--------------------.-----'---------------,- DISTRIBUTioN: OWNER. ARCHITECT. ENGINEER. CONTRACTQR, CITY. SUPPLIER . ;ct!. CHECKED BY: dee REVIEWED BY: LARRY CLARK, CE 26151 EXP 3/31/02 DATE:. --,------------DATE: 7-2. --ft OVER SO YEARS QF QUALITY SERVICE Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. Eatabllehed 1946 7895 CONVOY CT., SUITE 18 SAN DIEGO, CA 92111 (619) 715-5800 FAX (619) 715-5810 FINAL REPORT FOR SPECIAL INSPECTION AND MATERIAL TESTING ATLANTIC CllY RAHWAY FT. LAUDERDALE ORLANDO SAN DIEGO DATE: 7 /22 I 98 Job No. 97-306 TO: City of Carlsbad Building Department 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009 SUBJECT: SATISFACTORY COMPLETION OF WORK REQUIRING SPECIAL INSPECTION AND MATERIAL TESTING PERMITNO.: 96-2035 PROJECT ADDRESS Lot 51, Carlsbad Research Center 2091 Rutherford Road Carlsbad, California 92008 I declare under penalty of perjury that, to the best of my knowledg~, the work requiring special inspection, material sampling and testing, including the off:site fabrication of building components for the structure/s constructed under the subject permits is in conformance with the appro:vedplans; the.inspection and observation program arid other construction documents, and the applicable workmanship provisions of the Uniform Building Code. Executed on·this ·22th day ofJuly, 1998: : ' '· '_. •• • : .. ~ •' • ' • J The work which we provided consisted of: Special inspection ofreinforced concrete, rebar for slab-on-grade & concrete placement, epoxy dowels, structural steel (field welding), roofnailing and roofmg inspections. A. If the inspection services were provided by an approved material testing laboratory or special inspection agency: TESTING LABORATORY OR SPECIAL INSPECTION AGENCY: Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. ADDRESS: 7895 Convoy Court, Suite 18, San Diego, CA 92111 RESPONSIBLE MANAGING ENGINEER OF THE TESTING LABORATORY OR SPECIAL INSPECTION AGENCY: NAME (PRINT OR TYPE) Saliou Diallo_ ...... J1-'?lc=kf¼-=~~-:b=-"t'-..>i...:....C~=· ________ _ State of California Registration Number: C54071 Expiration Date: 12/31/99 B. If the inspection·services were provided by an independent certified special inspector: , ., SPECIALINSPBCtbR.'S'NAME ~(PRINT OR TYPE);-1 ··;_. _''' ::' .• , ._, ··:'. ·: -''.. REGISTRATIGNNUMBER: ' ·,·,,· '· .' J ' : l'· EXPIRATION.DAtt: • ·,,;' ' ; '~. • f • • • • • ' • • -, • • -< . ,,, SIGNATURE: OVER 50 YEARS OF QUALITY SERVICE Onir.i~,if.: ; ,~.-I ; .., J 1 .. "·. ! -... , • '-,-( = .. _. " "., .. ATLANTICCITY*RMNAY*FT. TESTING ENGINEERS SAN DIEGO (619)-715•5800 FAX(619)715-5810 LAUDERDALE* ORLANDO* SAN DIEGO REPORT OF COMPRESSION TEST PROJECT LOT 51 CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER PROJECT NO. 97-306 ------------,--- PROJECT ADDRESS CONTRACTOR 2091 RUTHERFORD ROAD CARLSBAD CALIFORNIA KOLL CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT/ ENGINEER WARE & MALCOMB ARCHITECTS/OIDAY CONSULTANTS BLDG. PERMIT NO. 96-2035 PLAN·FILE NO. SAMPLE DATA . Rl;PORTOF NIA · IE] CONCRE7:_E :o MORTAR D GROUT D HS GROUT D PRISMsD OTHER PLACEMENT DATE 6/5/98 DATE RECEIVED IN LAB 6/5/98 SUPPLIER NORTH COUNTY MIX DESIGN PSI 3000 --~~~----""-------------------- MIX NUMBER 3033000 MIX DESCRIPTION 5.25 SK TYPE OF CEMENT . NIA . TICKET NO. 245987 ---· -~ --·-· ---· - .ADMIXTURE C ,/;. ._._, __ ,·,_~.:-NIA.::. :: .. :,---~l8MP' :·:. -... 61/2" '·: . . . -·· . ---... -, ---"--'----------- NIA -----MIXING TIME·-· . S0MIN PERCENT AIR CONCRETE TEMP. 65 · AIRTEMP. ··· ·•.. · 52 -~~----------- 4000@ 28 DAYS· SAMPLES MADE BY H. SARKANI DESIGN STRENGTH (f '0) PSI LOCATION OF PLACEMENT -------------5 1/2 S.O.G. WEST OF LINE 7 AT LOADING DOCK BET APPX LINES H.33 & H.66 & BET 30FT TO SOFT LINES WEST OF LINE 7. LABORATORY DATA FIELD . DIMENSIONS TEST AREA (sq. MAXIMUM LOAD COMPRESSIVE IDENTITY· LAB NO. DATE TESTED (inches) . inches) (lbs) STRENGTH (psi) 7 142 6/12/98 6x 12 28.27 67,500 2390 28 143 7/3/98 6x 12 28:27 85,000 ~ 28 144 7/3/98 6X 12 28.27 85,500 r '-' 3·020 -H 145 6/5/98 0 .. ... -. , .. f,LL _SAMPLING AND TESTING PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE VVI.TJ:f ASTM TEST METHODS. *ACTUAL MEASURED AREA. . -· --. -. REMARKS: -· ---------· --~: :· ~:--... ·· ··.·•.: .. :·.: -, .. _; ... _ .. __ . .. -,.~ .. •J·-· ~--·---------~-~-----------="'-=---=. ~,--. -------- 6WN'ER, AR.CHITECT ~ ~NGl~EER,, CON~~~CTOR: 9iTY, SUPPLIER D.ISTRI.B,UTH~N': . ~ -l ' • -~ ..... -. , , .~, --.. . AC>,, --cH~~KE,D ~Y: ·-~ · · DATE: ------ REVIEWED BY: LARRY CLARK, RCE 26151, GE 219 DATE: ------- ,;; Wyman Testing Laboratories COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH O REINFORCED CONCRETE ~ FIELD WELDING REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL O PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE· 0 H.S. BOLTING INSPECTOR OF O REINFORCED MASONRY O SHOP WELDING SOURCE OR MFGR. DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN, RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR. (619) 675-0270 0 FIREPROOFING O SHOTCRETE D NDT D OTHER 0 D/B ANCHORAGE FOR WEEK ENDING PLAN FILE NO. N'A CONTR. DOING REPORTED WORK INSP'N DATE APPROVAL S PRINTED NAME: J/DtJI LOCATIONS OF WORK INSPECTED, TEST SAMPLES TAKEN, ETC., includes information about amounts of material placed or work performed; number, type, and identity numbers of test samples taken; structural connections (welds, h.t. bolts torques) checked; etc. NONE COMPLIANCE TIME IN: TIME OUT: INSPECTOR CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE -,~> 3:'#SPM f{)l»:~ /-ksse1,I A 6'1JIZl(A/ll1 ~m~~Ys?~'g~1 Tt~1~EH:63~~s~~~TWo~kLTgF c~ip~~001~l~~f~~~R<fv~~\.~~~ESJ SPECIFICATIONS. · Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. / 3467 KURTZ STREET ITTIELD REPORT Page_l _ of_{ _ ~AN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA92110 0 NOTICE TO COMPLY Date Plan File Number TO:---'-------------'--~---'----'- Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. · E1tabll1hed 194e · 7895 CONVOY CT., SUITE 18 SAN DIEGO, CA 92111 (619) 715-5800 FAX (619) 715-5810 ., ATLANTIC CITY RAfiWAY Ff. LAUDERDALE ORLANDO SAN DIEGO ORIGINAL REPORT OF COMPRESSION TEST . PROJECT LOT 51 CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER PROJECT NO . 97-306 PROJECT ADDRESS 2091 RUTHERFORD ROAD~ CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR ______ K~O=L=L=-C=O=N=S=T=R=U=C=T=I=O=N.:...--______________ -,-__ _ ARCHITECT/ENGINEER WARE & MALCOMB ARHCITECTS/BURKETT & WONG BLPG. PERMIT NO. 962035 PLAN FILE NO. N/A SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF: · [filcoNC,RETE 0MORTAR 0GROUT 0PRISMS OH/S· GROUT QOTHER PLACEMENT DATE 05-27-98 DATE RECEIVED IN LAB_---"0~6_-~0~1~-~9~8 __ SUPPLIER ----'------.N=E=L=S=O=N:......=S=L~O=AN=--- MIX NUMBER _______ -..:::::6~-~1=3~4=9~·~·----'--- TYPE OF CEMENT II ADMIXTURE WRDA 64 MIX DESIGN PSI MIX DESCRIPTION TICKET NUMBER SLUMP 4000 6.6 SK/FLYASH 700333 5 II TIME IN MIXER ----=1=-35=---M=I=N'------PERCENT AIR --------=2~.-"'0"""% ___ _ CQNC. TEMP 64° AIR TEMP. 56° UNIT WEIGHT WET 147.2 UNIT WEIGHT DRY N/A MlX REQUIRED PSI (f'c) 4000 PSI @ 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY H. SARKANI .LOCATION OF PLACEMENT 3 FT-WIDE POUR STRIP ALONG EAST FACE OF PANELS# 50 & 51 INCLUDING A 5'X11' SECTION OF s.o.G. FIELD LAB IDENTITY NO. 7 138 28 139 28 140 H 141 DATE TESTED 0.6-03-98 06,;..24-98 0.6-24-98 LABORATORY DATA DIMENSIONS INCHES 6 X 12 6 X ;1..2 6 X 12 TEST AREA SQ. INCHES 28.27 28.27 28.27 MAX LOAD POUNDS 111,500 116,000 117,000 ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM TEST METHODS *ACTUAL MEASURED AREA C31, C39, C78, C138, C143, C172, C173, C231, C617, C1064 LABORATORY DATA REMARKS DISTRIBUTION: OWNER. ARCHITECT. ENGINEER. CONTRACTOR, CiTY. SUPPLI'ER /C. COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH PSI 3940 4100 4140 CHECKED BY: A-CJ--·'"'...,_· -----"---REVIEWED BY: LARRY CLARK, CE 26151 EXP 3/31/02 DATE: DATE: ?-r~fl OVER 50 YEARS OF QUALITY SERVICE Wyman Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 FIELD WELDING . D FIREPROOFING 0 SHOTCRETE REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 H. S. BOLTING 0 NDT 0 OTHER INSPECTOR OF . 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 SHOP WELDING 0 D/B ANCHORAGE ,~o~E~u tll~r·;_or<:3:-·RC>_~~ Nc:97-306 1·FORWEEK ENDING May 15 1998 0 ~~0 5~?J~a~bad Research Center BL~~r-o'S~· I PLAN FILE NO. C~~-¥fl:!'e~E. GRADE. ETC.) A~Tf'e & Malcomb Architects D!F_y~3"1efN~1sf i I SOURCE OR MFGR. EN~~~!li.i-Lo-Torres DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN, RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) GEI(!&fg_C~§ffuction E7018 electrodes/SMAW process, and NR23 ~9!)1!~011fflff~~ORK -----.. E71T-:-8·; 0!~·072 wrre/fcaw process LA~yman Testing Laboratories ·.- ' ,.···.,,.· ' .;· / FIELD WELDING INSPECTION 5-15,....98 A. Visually inspected the field welding of the following connections: 1. Top chords o:e 26K224/128 joists to top chords of truss girders on line 6 & 5, between line K and line E.5, according to typical !=fetai). 5/SD-3. 2. Four·· ·sets of 4, ¼"x9"x4" plates per each 4x6 nailer, to top chords of 48G6N9. 4K truss girder. on line 6, between lines K & J.3, according to combinations of details 3/SD-7 & l/SD-3, because detai],., 3/SD-7 shows -pll/ 4"x4"x7" ,· and plate sizes actually welded .. conformances with detail 1/SD-3 (pll/ 4 "x9"x4") . are in 3. The ¼"x3"x10" splice plates on top chords of 30K224/128 and 26K224/J2.8 joists. connecting above truss girders on line 6, between lines K & e.5 according to typical detail 5/SD-3. 4 . The truss girder to girder splicing knife conn. Plates (pll"x3"xl'-8") at top of the pipe columns at grid points H/4, h/3; G/4,. G/3, F/4, & F/3, per detail 2/SD-3. Compl~\~d welds were inspected for size, length, location and unles~-r: .. q;therwise noted; are free of visible defects and in accortjaf:1:~e with referenced details & specifications. ... : .. ;: . CLS 5:.:.19~98 i._. : Signed copy on file. Hossein F. Sarkani .. ·: :L ,_ :. · CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE ' HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED All OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS :JTHERWISE NOTED:! HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & ,PECIFICATIOt)-JS. AND, APPLICABLE SECTIONS. SIGNAfORE OF REGISTERED INSPEcror~ . . . ..... DATE OF REPORT REGISTER NUMBER I ! l • • ~ Wyman Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE [J FIELD WELDING . D FIREPROOFING 0 SHOTCRETE REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 H. S. BOLTING D NOT D OTHER . INSPECTOR (?F. 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 SHOP WELDING 0 D/B ANCHORAGE J~~~E~utherford Road Nc97...:.3Q6 I FOR WEEK ENDING May 15 1998 Otft>~ 0SfR?!~~bad Research Center BL~~'t:Jl3l50· I PLAN FILE NO. C~~i ~,S~ CTYofE,~~-Eijr • B tube steel A~~f'ef & Malcomb Architects DESIGN STRENGTH I SOURCE OR MFGR .. ENR~~i-Lo-Torres DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN, RE-BAR 'GRADE & MFGR.) · G~~1ia.ccee11-s~uction · E7018 electrodes/SMAW process, and NR23 ~~rlA_~OIWflli:~e'JORK E71T-8';. 0'.--O72 wrre/fcaw process ·LAW~an Testing Laboratories . .,. .. .,.. .. /' / FIELD WELDING INSPECTION 5-14-98 A. Visually inspected the field. welding of the following connections: 1. top chords of 48G6N9. 4K truss girder to truss girder seat (PL1/2~x6-1/2"x10") at grid. point A/6, :_; LC. c:j· per typical detail l/SD-3. 2. Top •icfiords of 30K224/128 joists in the bay between wall panels on line: 11 . , and girders on 1-ine 6 (between D.5 & A) according to details 7/SD-3 (at wall's joist girders). seats) & 5/SD"-3 (at· top of 3. Two:,: :truss girder to girder splicing knife conn. Plates (pll"x3,,:'xl' -8") at top of two pipe columns at grid points J/4 & J/3, per' ·detail 2/SD-3. 4. Top chords of 48G6N8 .3K truss girder to truss girder seat (pll/2"x6-1/2"kl0") at gri_d point A/5, per typical detail l/SD-3. B. Co:r:npleted welds were inspected for size, length, location and to the best of my knowledge are free of visible defects and in accordance. with " .... l.,• the referenced details & specifications. : :. t .:.. <:1 .. ,. : .. ) .. ... .. ,:: . ~ i : :1 CLS 5-19-98 Signed copy on file. Hossein F. Sarkani ,, .. al ')t .. ;-·· CERTIFICATION OF C_OMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTiF°'{THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIO~?:-f-N(? APPLICABLE SECTIONS. SIGNAIORE OF REGISIERED INSPECTOR DATE OF REPORT REGISTER NUMBER ·;,,. Wyman Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING .WORK: PERFORMED WHICH O REINFORCED CONCRETE REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL tJ PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 FIELD WELDING . 0 H. ·s. BOLTING 0 FIREPROOFING O SHOTCRETE D NDT D OTHER INSPECTOR OF O REINFORCED MASONRY tJ SHOP WELDING 0 D/B ANCHORAGE J~~REEfutherf ord Road No97-306 IFORWEEK May 15 ENDING q}'~JE CS!'}0 ~'ea~ad Research Center BL~~~~-I PLAN FILE NO. ARwt¥fe & Malcomb Architects DESIGN STRENGTH I SOURCE OR MFGR. EN~lhi ... Lo-Torres DESCRIBE MAT'L (MiX DESIGN. RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) E701$ electrodes/SMAW process .... . ·-.... , LA!Wyrnan Testing Laboratories / . .:· FIELD WELDING INSPECTION 5-13-98 A. Visually-inspected the field welding of three 30K224/128 joists in the b~y between wall panels on line 7, and girders on line 6 (between E & D.5) according to details 7/SD-3 & 5/SD-3 as they applY .. _P-~};. type of connections. B. Completed welds .. were inspected for size, length, location and to the: b.est of my knowledge are free of visible defects and in accordance with the-referenced details·& and specifications. C. Due to rain, the welding operations were stopped & scheduled inspecti:on was cancelled, no further inspections were performed . ... 1., ••• ·-• . : [ : ... : T< -~ CLS 5-19-98 Signed copy on file. Hossein F. Sarkani "i ·_·· ... !,•.? ,· CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERJIF.Y. THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOl'ED ·I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS. AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. . . , .. ' ..... slGNAIORE OF REGISIERED INSPECTol? DAIE OF REPORT REGISTER NUMBER Wyman Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 . . COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 FIELD WELDING . D FIREPROOFING 0 SHOTCRETE REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 H. S. BOLTING D NOT 0 OTHER INSPECTOR OF 0 REINFORCED MASONRY D SHOP WELDING 0 D/B ANCHORAGE J2~R'Rbtherford Road Nc:97-306 I FOR WEEK ENDING May 15 1998 ~ ~~0 ~£-1!:~bad Research Center BLE!f6e!:2tellS~-I PLAN FILE NO. mij~· 1v:A."5-:gTY~1_~DE&ET~o00 gr. B tube steels A~lf<e & Malcomb Architects DESIGN STRENGTH I SOURCE OR MFGR. EN~~~&i-Lo-Torres DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN, RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) Ge~ig_c~§ffuction E7018 electrodes/SMAW process, and NR23 ~qr_n¥\_qo1'Wh'!~~P8K. D. Const. E71T:...8·, 0-:·07~-wi"re/fcaw process LAWyman Testing Laboratories ,,. , ~·· .. l ./ FIELD WELDING INSPECTION 5-12-98 A. Visually inspected the fi·eld welding of the following connections: 1. The L3"x3"x3 / 8 ''x6" corner conn. Angle-to panels 15 & 16 embed plates, and similarly to panels 12 & 13 embed plates per detail 10/SD ~ 2-, ., .except that ¼" fillet welds was not provided all around due to matching, length of corner connection angles & walls embed plates -(all were 6" long, the contractor was informed. .. .. . -. 2. The 3-splicing·Ll-1/2xl-1/2xl/4 angle steels to 3-#6 chord bars between panels 13 & 14 per detail 19/SD-2 & weld schedule 20/SD2. 3. The truss girder to girder splicing knife conn. Plates (pll"x3"xl'-8") at _top of columns on lines 4 & 3, between A.1 & E, per det~J.l 2/ SD-3 . 4 . Top chords of 30 K224/128 joists in the bay between wall panels on line 7, and girders on line 6 (between H & E) according to details 7 /SD-3· (at walls joist seats) & 5/SD-3 (at top of truss girders). B. Cor:nwleted welds were inspected for size, length, location and to the best of my knowledge are free of visible defects and in accordance with referenced details & specifications, except as noted :·on.::section Al of this report. ' . . . ... '··' .~ C. Due \t'b rain, the welding operations were stopped & scheduled _inspection was cancelled. No further inspections were performed. .\ ' ~~ -... :.; _., . -~-' CLS 5;-:-1~:-:-.98 Signed copy on file. Hossein F. Sarkani {: CERTiFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY,JHAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO-COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & slGNAl@E OF REGISTERED INSPECTOI~ SPECIFICATIOl':JS, AND.APPLICABLE SECTIONS. . ••• I •• '• ', DATE OF REPORT REGISIER NUMBER i •• I I', Wyman Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 FIELD WELDING . 0 FIREPROOFING 0 SHOTCRETE REQUIRED AP~RpVAL BY THE SPECIAL 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE D H. s. BOLTING D NDT 0 OTHER INSPECTOR Of 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 SHOP WELDING 0 D/B ANCHORAGE J~~RE~uth,erford Road No97-3Q6 I FOR WEEK ENDING May 15 19 98 o~e,~ 0 SfR,oJ~~bad Res.earch Center BL~€f'...l;~T3'S>, I PLAN FILE NO. c1ti:si~; M1{'S9YPp~E~ o gr. B tube steels ARw-gri'e & Malcomb Architects Dlp~~6ENX~i I SOURCE OR MFGR. ENffl§hi-Lo-Torres DESCRIBE'MAT'L (MIX DESIGN. RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) GE~ff0(!"6tfst'rUCtion NR-211 E71T-11, 5/64 wire/fcaw process :cOBTf_A??lrw,t¥§..P@§.~~oRK NR-232' E71T-8, a~072 wire/FCAW + E7018/ LAEW~an Testing Laboratories. .. / smaw ;-•' .. l / FIELD WELDING INSPECTION 5-11-98 A. Visually inspected the field welding of the following connections: 1. Four truss purlin seats (1/2"x6"x12" plate W/2-3/8" gusset plates @· 8" GA) at panel joints between panels 36 & 35, 32 & 31, 28 & 27-, r -.~nd 24 & 23, per details 14 & 13/SD-3. 2. The -~··truss girder to girder splicing knife conn. Plates (pll"x3?'_xl' -8") at top of columns on line 5 per detail 2/SD-3. 3. Top. chords of 48G6N9. 4K ·truss girder seat (pll/2"x6-1/2"x10") at gr:j..o.: point K/6, per typical detail 1/SD-3. 4. Top'--·chords of 30K 224/128 joists in the bay between wall panels on line 7, and girders on line 6 (between lines K & H) according to details 7/SD-3 (at wall's joist seats) & 5/SD-3 (at top of truss gj..~ders). B. Noticed and informed the contractor that 2 of the joists within the bay described in section A4 (one 8' south of K onl line, and one on H line) are erected improperly, so that their top chords has no bearing with joists (purlin) seats on line 7. These joists actually rest on their web's reinforcing members causing a root openir;i.g of up to ½" which requires corrections before it can be weldeq._ .--P.E?:r plan . . . 1:,. I •; c. Completed welds were inspected for size, length, location and to the best of my-__ ·knowledge are free of visible defects and in accordance with the referel;)-9,ed details & specifications, except as noted on section B. CLS 5~19-98 Signed copy on file. Hossein F. Sarkani : r,:; ' • ··: 1.: •• , . · ·, CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATION?,~~~ APPLICABLE SECTiONS. slGNAT@E OF REGISTERED INSPECIOR DATE OF REPORT REGISTER NUMBER ·1 .. •,; ·1 .L I ·' Wyman. Testing Laboratories (619) 675~0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 FIELD WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING 0 SHOTCRETE REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL [] PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 H. S. BOLTING D NDT D OTHER. INSPECTOR OF 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 SHOP WELDING 0 D/B ANCHORAGE ~~ffR~t~erf~rd Road., Carlsbad, CA. N~7-306 I FORWE_EK ENDING May 29 1998 <t'1Ii:R3Yf0 tWlf'~bad Research Center BL~ti'2<~~ ~O\ I PLAN FILE NO. " '·-" _ .. _ ~ -. -~ CONSTR. MAT'L (TYPE. GRACiE. ETC.) A'WHITECT , are & Malcomb Architects :DESIGN STRENGTH I SOURCE OR MFGR. . . E~INEfil. . os i-Lo-Torres DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN, RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) Groiric~c'M'&t0/uction CONTR. DOING REPORTED WORK ,i,:1 •• ............ ·-,:,,-· •• _ ·.i ~ " ~yman Testing Laboratories .-... ; ., . . / FIELD INSPECTION AND TEST REPORTS Enclosed are field inspection and/or test reports, for the above referenced projec.t, fqr _work performed on 5/26/98-5/29-98. These reports cover the locations of work inspected and/or tested following recogn.13-tzea-·:standards ahd do not constitute engiheering opinion or project contr_o_;L .,:1.~t.<, :d:: -, . ' '. These reports do not relieve the contractor of his responsibility to build per the plans, specifications and all applicable codes. Should you have any questions regarding these reports, please contact our office at ( 619) 715-5800. Reports enclosed (6) cc: (1) Ware & Malcomb Architects (1) Koll Construction (l)Faraday Center LLC (l)O'Day Consultants (1) City of Carlsbad (l)Koshi-Lo-Torres· .•. ! ·~ :\c; ::1:··,· .. . :' i ~! t ~ .i:-.. :,·, t·i~: 1:·\:: ·.:·· ·: .:·: ,· . : i -~~ i. · :1 f:· " ·' l .. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERT(Ff·THAf ( HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE. NPT9P.il. HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS, SIGNATURE OF REGISTERED INSPECTOR DATE OF REPORf REGISTER NUMBER Wyman Testing laboratories COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH O REINFORCED CONCRETE ~D WELDING REQUIRED APPROVAL BY· THE SPECIAL O PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE O H.S. BOLTING INSPECTOR OF O REINFORCED MASONRY. 0 SHOP WELDING No.9'7- DESIGN STRENGTH Ks/ SOURCE OR MFGR. ENGINEER QESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN, RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR. GENERAL CONTRACTOR (619) 675-0270 0 FIREPROOFING O SHOTCR'ETE D NDT D OTHER 0 D/B ANCHORAGE FOR WEEK.~ i/lJ ENDING U -~ PLAN FILE NO. ~ '/ 19 98 CONJR. DOING REPORTED WORK INSP'N DATE s-~ APPROVAL S PRINTED NAME: LOCATIONS OF WORK INSPECTED, TEST SAMPLES TAKEN, ETC., includes information about amounts of material placed or work performed; number, type, and identity numbers of test samples taken; structural connections (welds, h.t. bolts torques) checked; etc. NONE COMPLIANCE TIME IN: TIME OUT: INSPEC.TOR CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTI.FY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & 9 ~ SPECIFICATIONS. ~: ~'Re;;m ~ Wyman Testing Laboratori.es COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH O REINFORCED CONCRETE ~ FIELD WELDING REQUIRED APPROVAL BY TH~ SPECIAL O PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE O H.S. BOLTING INSPECTOR OF O REINFORCED MASONRY O SHOP WELDING NO. '17-3od:, (619) 675-0270 0 FIREPROOFING O SHOTCRETE D NOT D OTHER 0 D/B ANCHORAGE FOR WEEK ENDING PLAN FILE NO. INSP 1N DATE LOCATIONS OF WORK INSPECTED, TEST SAMPLES TAKEN, ETC., includes information about amounts of material placed or work performed; number, fype, and identify numbers of test samples taken; structural connections (welds, h.t. bolts torques) c;:hecked; etc. TIME OUT: PRINTED NAME: INSPECTOR CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. T HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS. Wy,man Testing Laboratories COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH O REINFORCED CONCRETE ~ FIELD WELDING REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL O PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE O H.S. BOLTING INSPECTOR OF O REINFORCED MASONRY O SHOP WELDING (619) 675-0270 0 FIREPROOFING O SHOTCRETE D NDT D OTHER 0 D/B ANCHORAGE INSP'N DATE LOCATIONS OF WORK INSPECTED, TEST SAMPLES TAKEN, ETC., includes information about amounts of material placed or work performed; number, type, and identity numbers of test samples taken; structural connections (welds, h.t. bolts torques) checked; etc. TIME OUT: PRINTED NAME: INSPECTOR CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS. 3i3oPM Wyman-·· Testing Laboratories COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH f8 REINFORCED CONCRETE O FIELD WELDING REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL [] PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE O H.S. BOLTING INSPECTOR OF O REINFORCED MASONRY O SHOP WELDING (619) 675-0270 0 FIREPROOFING O SHOTCRETE D NOT D OTHER 0 D/8 ANCHORAGE INSP'N DATE LOCATIONS OF WORK INSPECTED, TEST SAMPLES TAKEN, ETC., includes information about amounts of material placed or work performed;nurnber, type, and Identity numbers of test samples taken; structural connections (welds, h.t. bolts APPROVAL PRINTED NAME: torques) chec_ked; etc. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE NONE COMPLIANCE TIME IN: TIME OUT: INSPECTOR I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS ~tr!i1i1Tli~rfD I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & LO: 5o flM . ~~~ED •i1%P1:'"21v,< Wyman-- Testing Laboratories COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH O REINFORCED CONCRETE ~ FIELD WELDING REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL O PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE O H.S. BOLTING INSPECTOR OF O REINFORCED MASONRY O ~HOP WELDING (619) 675-0270 0 FIREPROOFING o· SHOTCRETE D NDT D OTHER 0 D/B ANCHORAGE FOR WEEK ENDING PLAN FILE NO. :==~~~~==~=::::::~~~~~~~-~~~~:=::::!_ ~~=1=~~=============~' INSP 1N DATE PRINTED NAME: LOCATIONS OF WORK INSPECTED, TEST SAMPLES TAKEN, ETC., Includes information about amounts of material placed or work performed; number, type, and identity numbers of test s9mples taken; structural connections (welds, h.t. bolts torques) checked; etc. INSPECTOR CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK._ UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS. Wyman Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE D PRE-STRESSED ·coNCRETE D REINFORCED MASONRY 0 FIELD WELDING . [] H. S. BOLTING 0 SHOP WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING D NDT 0 D/8 ANCHORAGE E~ 95~R?JreEi¥.J:1§pad.Js~§-~_§.rch s;e~ 1:;_e!" ___ j -. . No97'-3Q6 I FOR WEEK May 2 2 ENDING . BL~.E2'GS5'· I PLAN FILE NO. AR'W§f<e & Malcomb Architects Df:41f~Uf@JN!'1"~i. ISOURCEORMFGNelson/Slola~'hi-Lo-Torres DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN, RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) GE~L_];:Q~H:~J.\~tl~uction Concrete mix design #6~1349· E701s-·-··e1ect:toaes/ smaw process NR232 LA!Wyman Testing Laboratories ·E71T-8, 0.072 wire/fcaw process CONCRETE/FIELD WELDING INSPECTION 5-22-98 0 SHOTCRETE D OTHER A. fuspected the reinforcing steel installation for size, grade, lap, locations & clearances for the 3' wide pour strips at perimeter of the building, and along panels #!:?0 & #51 according to details 1/SD-2 and 7/SD.2. Additionally inspected the rebars at a 5' xll' section of slab east of panel #50, anc;i at another section of slab located 16'-6" east of line 7, between E.1/7, E.65/7, E.1/6.6, & e.5/6.6 (approx. ) all according to 5-1/2" cone. Slab -note on foundation plan on sheet S-4. B. Insp\3~t.eg . "\:he placement and consolidation of 90 cubic yards of Concreb,?-"irito' · all perimeter pour strips & s. o. g. section east of line 7_,. ~zq::J-µding "the section of pour strip along line 1, between H & B .. 1., and the pour strip & sog sections around panels #50 & 51. C. One·, :set· of -4 test cylinders was taken from the conc;::rete load delivered by truck #407, ticket #699811, whose slump was 5" and was pla·ced in the Pour strip along line 7, between e. 35 & G. 5, and sog section between E.35/7, E.35/6.6i E.65/7 & e.65/6.6. D. To tp~.?~St of my knowledge, the work inspected is in · accordarlce···with the approved plans and specifications. "··-·i,;. :.. FIELD WELDING INSPECTION A. Visuatly.inspected the field welding of the following connections: 1. The.splice plate PL1"x3-1/2"x28" to top chords of 30K224/128 joist and top flange of W24x68 beam at grid point e/6, according to detail 7/SD-7. 1" thick plate was used in lieu of¾" thick plate. 2. Four sets of four ¼"x9"x4" plates per each 4x6 nailer, to top chords of 48G4N8. 3K truss girder on line 4, between lines A.1 & B according to detail 3/SD-7 -:~: l/9D~3 (for plates dimensions). 3. Four:,,sets. of four ¼"x9"x4" plates per each 4x6 nailer, to top chords of 48G6N9 .:41-K. tru·ss girder on line 6, between lines A & A. 2 according to detail 3/SD-7 .-&:.: li/SD-3 (fo~ plates dimensions) . B. Complete<t:J_ welds were insps:cted for size, length, location and are free of visible 'defects and in accord~nce with the referenced details & speci'f f:aa,t:iohs, to the best of :i;n.y knowledge. CLS 5,-.::2f:F-!98 Signed copy on file. Hossein F. Sarkani -:.·, < "• ' .. : ~. .,. ~ . .. . ' . ··: .r CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE 1 HEREBY CERTIFY :THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED woRK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATION~; f.-ND :APPLICABLE SECTIONS. i :.--'; ::.!: lf(Y. ~th.-. ··:'" ·-J• ~ : • I • ' ' • . -· . Wyman : Testing ~··. -iU,,-::· -Je~\. ~ . . Laboratories (619) 675-0270 .. •w ,I· COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 FIELD WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING 0 SHOTCRETE REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 H. S. BOLTING D NOT 0 OTHER INSPECTOR OF..: .. : .. 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 SHOP WELDING 0 D/B ANCHORAGE J21'()"9'fR~~n~~fdrd Road No97-3Q6 I FOR WEEK ENDING May 22 19 98 ~~ '5!1'~0 jffl!1ii~ad Research Center BL~Ef'..E~1J5'· I PLAN FILE NO. SA?.!3!6~-MA15 3fY'i§-~@E&f=T<A.'5 O O gr • B tube steels ARWNfe & Malcomb Architects DESIGN STRENGTH I SOURCE OR MFGR. ENffls'hi-Lo-Torres DESCRIBE f'0AT'L (MIX DESIGN, RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) GEm1_LF9!;!&.fi<§Tf>~uction E7018 electrodes/SMAW process NR232 cqJT.RJP.Pl~~(§~~1>s<i err a Steel E71T-B, '-Q·~·o7z--·wire/FCAW process LA!Wyman Testing Laboratories --- / ... ' /" FIELD WELDING INSPECTION 5-21-98 A. Performed visual inspection of field welding at the following connections: 1. Four truss girder to girder spacing knife plates (pll"x3"xl'- 10") at grid points J/2, H/2, G/2, & F/2 according to detail 2A/SP-3.. , 2. Th'~-:pf. Li'1'x5"x28" top ( '.chords splice plate to top flange of W21x44 beam, and to of 48G6N10K truss girder connecting at grid point E/2 accqr.ding to detail 18/SD-3. 3. Two T-86"x6"x3/8" inverted V braces to W24x55 beams ¾" thick gusset -plate, and two ½" thick stiffener plates to W24x55 beam, all at approx. grid point C.5/1.75 (2nd floor el eve.) and per detail ... ,1/:SD. 5 (ref.· Detail C/SD.5. 4. Th;:i;:-eie \~i2x65 columns with their ¾" thick gusset plates to three base plates (PL ¾"x18"x36" ftg. Embeds) at grid points E/6, E/5, & E/4 pe·r detail 7 /SD. 5 (ref. Detail .A./SD-5.) 5. Top chords of 26K224/128 joists to top chords of truss girders on lines 4 & 3, between lines F-& A.1, per detail 5/SD-3 typically; and per details 8 & 10/SD.6 at grid point A.2/3; and per detail 7/SD-3 at grid point A.15/3. .-· .. B. Not;:e::· -Ref~r to section "Al" of 5-19--98 inspection report regarding info. Requested.~or· connection of joist seat & its 2· gusset plates at A.1/4, which is sim,i1~~rt·y -~pplicable at A.2/3, due to panel 12 embed elev./location. C. Coinp-leted ··'welds were in,spected for ~ize, length, location and to the best of my kiibwiedge are free of visible defects and 'in accordance with referenced detailq: /& specifications, except as noted on section B. CLS 5.~28-:-:-98' Signed copy on file. Ho-ssein • ()_ ' I • ,'), :: I ;,t ; ~ : : ! ~ . CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CER IFY THAT I· HAVE IN P All OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS ffll . S ECTED OTHERWISE NOTED f HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS, AND APiPLICABLE SECTIONS. •~, ~ ,:, I• • ·:,·· ,:·i· .. . . . 1,. ·, F. Sarkani Nl/ -~-;.If. ~ • :;1GNAIUl<c ui-"L=•~•L•<cu 1N:w1::1_;iOR ) . ili~-•:: _:··'..:.Wyman -: Testing . E . _ Laboratories (619) 675-0270 . I ·' 0 FIELD WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING 0 SHOTCRETE 1 COVERING WQRK P~RFORMED WHICH 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE : REQUIRED AP~~~V ~L-BY THE SPECIAL 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 H. S. BOLTING D NOT 0 OTHER 1 INSPECTOR OF : · . I _t,! : -I 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 SHOP WELDING 0 D/8 ANCHORAGE J~O~Es.Ruth:erford Road N0.97-3O6 I FOR WEEK May 22 19 98 .. ' ENDING O'1I~tO'5~?.J~~~~~bad Research Center SLD~·6'S.'WJS· I PLAN FILE NO. C~~-~'.S'Efl'Yff.i._~D& ETJt5QQ gr. B tube steel ARCWJ3.Er~ & Malcomb Architects DESl(i,N STRENGTH I SOURCE OR MFGR. EN9:lttsIDl_i-Lo-Torres ., DESCRIBE MAT'l (MIX DESIGN, RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) GE~1S:O~5tfstrtuction E7O18 electrodes/SMAW process NR232 cO'EJ~~?1Nwfl§..f>€>§.T~~ierra Steel E71T~·a;· 'O ;O·7·z-·wf':i::-e/FCAW process LABWyman Testing Laboratories -- •' ,. FIELD WELDING INSPECTION 5-20-98· A. Visually inspected the field welding of following connections: 1. Top chords of 26K224/128 joists to top cho;rds of truss girders on lines 4 & 3,. between lines K & F, according to typ. Detail 5/SD-3. 2. The ¼11x311:Xl011 splice plates on top chords of 26K224/128 joists connecting above. truss girders on line 4, between lines K & F, according to typ. Detail 5/SD.3. 3. Four..·. s.ets .. of 4, ¼11x9"x4" plates per each 4x6 nailer, to top chords of 48G6N8':·3K trffss girder on line 4, between iines K & J.3 according to detail 3/SD. 7., &·:.1/SD.3 (for plates dimensions). 4. The .. PL l 11x5"x28 splice plate to top flange of W21x44 beam, and to top chords :i ci:f :: 48'GN8. 7K .truss girder connecting at grid point C/2 per d_etail 18/SD-3. 5. All the connections (girder seat PL ½11x7 11x12" with 2-1/2" gusset plates @ 4" GA. And splice plate 7/8"x611x2211 between the 48G6N8.7 girder and panel #9's, W24x55 :extended embed at approx. B.1/2 as shown & according to detail 15/SD-3. 6. Two ·Ts··, 611x611x3/811 columns with th.eir ¾" thick gusset plates to two PLl11xl8".xl811 base plates (ftg. Embeds) at grid points C.5/1.5 & C.5/1.9 per detail 8/SD.5 (ref. Detail C/SD.5). 7. two TS6 11x611x3/811 inverted V braces to ¾II thick gusset plates of the two TS611x611x3/811 columns at C.5/1.5 & C.5/1.9 per detail 8/SD-5 (ref. Detail C/SD-St ~; B. Completed. welds were inspected for size, length, accorc1,a~.se·;. ~ith referenced details and specifications, knowledge .. , ' •• J •• .. I ,:; :: :· j ~ • : ' CLS 5-"'""28-98 Signed copy on file. Hossein :. ::·:. j' ;i:·: ; i .:· ,, -. . . ; ~ l ,I . CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE ! I HEREBY CERTIFY,Tf-!AT I-HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. •• : : : I '1 F. location and in to the best of my Sarkani -~ ,,L_ '· .A_,,.,. . - )•.. .. -·. ; Wyman · < ::_: · _ Testing ~~ l[ .. · · Laboratories (619) 675-0270 ..... COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH 0 REINFORCED CONCRElE 0 FIELD WELDING . 0 FIREPROOFING 0 SHOTCRETE REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL '[] PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 H. S. BOLTING D NOT D OTHER INSPECTOR OF 0 REINFORCED MASONRY [] SHOP WELDING 0 D/8 ANCHORAGE J~ ()~E~utherf ord Road N097---3Q6 I FOR WEEK ENDING May 22 1998 0mt013~?J1=6~¥§bad Research Center .. : .: ' . Bl~e°J;~T:3'5', I PLAN FILE NO. C9!t13~-~~IE, GRADE, ETC.) ARW1!ff'e & Malcomb Architects DE_el~~N<k!/3 i I SOURCE OR MFGR, ENffl§hi-'.Lo-Torres QESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN, RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) GE~FCC6{l's~!tuction . ' E7018 electrodes/SMAW process NR232 . CO:BTM??l~f9?&c§~~ORK . E71T-'8; ''0'."07-Z'·'wf'i:e/FCAW process LAEWyman Testing _Laboratories ., , ... ' " " ' ' . , ,, ,, FIELD WELDING INS.PE CT ION '. 5-19-98 . A. Visually inspected the field welding of the connections described below: 1. top chords of 26K224/128 joists to top chords of .truss girders on lines 5 & 4 between line-s e.5 & A, according to typical ' ., • -• ·1 .,~. ' •. ,, , detai'l '"''5/sn-~3; except for one joist at A.1/4 per detail 8/SD-6 & 1 O / SD .... 6: :, ·aria·. one joist at A. 05/ 4 per detail 7/SD-3 to panels joist seat :embed. Howev~f., in regards to connection of ½" joist seat plate &· its 2 gusset'· plates at A. 1/ 4; noticed & informed the contractor that it does not· conform with details 8 & 10 on sheet SD.6 (as welded & due t:0.1:p'anel 15 embed plates elevation/location). Requested for info/ clar-ification .,. r ' • < -from the Engineer. 2. ¼"x3"x10" splice plat~s on top chords of 26K224/128 joists connecting. above the truss g.irders on line 5, between lines e.5 & A, accorc;ling to detail 5/SD-3. 3. Four sets of four ¼"x9"x4" plates per each 4x6 nailer, to top chords of 48G6N8.3K truss girder on line 5, between lines A & A.2 per dE?,tail 3/SD-7 & 1/SD.3 for·plate dimensions. B. Completed welds were inspected for size, length, location and , are free:: of. visible J, • .,, •'· •• \, f " defects and in accordance with the referenced detail~·= Ji -$pecifications, to the best of my noted--Dn·-,s.ection Al . ' --• ·, -t. • .. • -~ •• f ! CLS s·~2 1s~-9s. ' L .• ' '" I Signed copy on file. Hossein ':· " : : . ~ \ :'.'.I,;::-:: .I CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIP(THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE .ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, I HA vnouND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIO_~~-"A~(?._,1'_Pf_L(CABLE SECTIONS. !"..:--, t' : : . ',(; I :, knowledge except as F. Sarkani lf{l_~L_ ~ ::Sl<.;i_NAIUl<t: Ur """"'"'"Rl::lJ 11\,::,,-t:\.,,IUI< . ..... r Wyman Testing .Laboratories (619) 675-0270 .: . 0 FIELD WELDING . 0 FIREPROOFING· 0 SHOTCRETE COVERING WORK .PERFORMED WHICH 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL 0 PRE~STRESSED CONCRETE 0 H. S. BOLTING 0 NDT 0 OTHER INSPECTOR OF 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 SHOP WELDING 0 0/8 ANCHORAGE .. . J~~RE~l.it;:herford Road N0.9 7-3-Q 6· I FOR WEEK ENDING May 22 19 98 OIJ't>6e °S!~O4.~~bad Research Center BLD~6'~~JS· I PLAN FILE NO. CJ:t~· ~~ME:.GRADE. ETC.) ' AR<wtzI're & Malcomb Architects . DF~3T6EN~~i -: !, . ' I SOURCE OR MFGR . EN~§ni -Lo-Torres DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX 'DESIGN, RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) GE~ef.1:1°1::Y&fs~uction ; . . . E7018 elect~odes/SMAW process .CO'EJ~~?INWJ.II§..~§!~ORK ·. NR2 3 2 ..... E 7fT~'~"'-:t) ;'07 2 wire/FCAw· process LABWyman Testing Laboratories .. ... / ' ·.·. FIELD WELDING INSPECTION 5-'-18-98 A. Visually inspected the field welding of the following connections: 1 . Top chords of 48G6N8. 3K truss girder to truss girder seat (PL ½"x6..:1/2"x10") at grid point K/5, per typical detail l/SD-3. 2.. TqP,.,.,PDJ~9-S of 26K224/128 joists to top on lffie0s::r •,"& 4, between chords of truss girders lines K & e.5, 5/SD-:iLC I! ~ ·::, according to typical detail 3. Four:. sets of four ¼"x9"x4" plates per each 4x6 nailer, to top chords .,.of 48G6N8.3K truss girder on line 5, between lines K & J.3 , ... •' ... according to detail 3/SD-7 (refer also to detail 1/Sd-3 for plate siz.es) . · 4 . The .. r:¼'tx3''x10" splice plates on top chords of 26K224/128 joists conne·Q:t}~g : above truss gj_rders on line 5, between-lines K & E.5, according to typical detail 5/SD-3. 5. Total of six gusset plates ( PL : 2-3 /8 " @ 8" GA.) and joist seat plate~ (PL ½"x6"x12") to panels #50 & #51 west-face embed plates . accord_ing to details 17 & 7 on sheet SD-3; and one joist seat with 2-::3/8" gusset plates-at panels 50 & 51 joint per details 14 & 13/SD~3. :' :L .:: L :l . L L \ B. Co~pfeteµ welds-were ·inspected for size, length, location and to the . .. ,, ,best \. ~ • • -.1 • • of my knowledge are free of visible defects and in accordance ·1 with J, ... • •. •. the referenced details & specifications. ! ::1 :., .. ·1 l ·; . < CLS 5~2'8-:98: Signed copy on file. Hossein F. Sarkani • I -I!" , ' , :• ·: l. ... ; ,. .:.: : . , CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY °THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED--1 HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS. AND APiPLICABLE SECTIONS. ··'· ... :.I .. • . l . • :: • I' 'J,' 17150 Via Del Campo Suite 307 San Diego, CA 92127 1-800-487 -0355 WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES REPORT OF COMPRESSION TEST· PROJECT LOT 51 CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER PROJECT NO. 97-306 PROJECT ADDRESS -------~-CONTRACTOR ----=K=O=L-;a-L------=C ___ O ____ N ___ S=T ..... R-U-C=T=I-O ____ N ___________________ _ ARCHITECT/ENGINEER ___ W=AR=E---=&~MA=L=C~O~M=B_ARH~-C-!~T=E~C=T=S~/~B=URK-==-=E=T~T-=&-----'-'W=O=N=G'----------- BLDG. PERMIT NO. 962035 PLAN FILE NO. N/A _ SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF: ~ CONCRETE D MORTAR D GROUT D PRISMS DH/ s GROUT D OTHER PLACEMENT DATE 04~18-98 NIA DATE RECEIVED IN LAB-~---=---,--- SUPPLIER ------------=N=E=L=S=O=N'--=S=L=O=AN=--MIX DESIGN PSI 3000 MIX NUMBER ------"'6_-=5~5=2 ____ _ l"ROCK MIX DESCRIPTION-----=---=-="--==-=----- . TYPE OF CEMENT ____ I=I=-..,_/ _C=1=5"""'0"---'-----TICKET NUMBER 62637 ADMIXTURE WRDA 64 SLUMP 4" ---------~----- TIME IN MIXER ____ 4=9:a.....::M=I=N'-'----,,_ N/A PERCENT AIR ___________ _ CONC. TEMP 68o AIR TEMP. 10° N/A UNIT WEIGHT WET N/A UNIT WEIGHT DRY ----=-4---=---- MIX REQUIRED PSI (f'c) 3000 PSI @ 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY s. P. FLORES LOCATION OF PLACEMENT .PANEL -38. ~...a.=.===:..,..-~-"------------------------- FIELD LAB IDENTITY NO. 5 77 6 78 28 79 28 80 H 81 DATE TESTED 04-23-98 04-24-98 05-16-98 05-16-98 ~ABORATORY DATA DIMENSIONS INCHES 6 X 12 6 X 12 6 X 12 6 X 12 TEST AREA SQ. INCHES 28.27 28.27 28.27 28.27 MAX LOAD POUNDS 71,000 73,500 112,500 111,500 ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM TEST METHODS *ACTUAL MEASURED AREA C31, C39, C78, C138, C143, C172, C173, C231, C617, C1O64 . LABORATORY DATA REMARKS DISTRIBUTION: OWNER, ARCHITECT, ENGINEER, CONTRACTOR, CITY, SUPPLIER COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH PSI 2510 2600 3980 394,0 CHECKED BY: 84 7~ < REVIEWED BY: · ../,,IL~~~L../L,~~~ DATE: . ..S--:Z.G-f ~ i DATE: S -2. 7 ~ j f. 17150 Via Del Campo Suite 307 San Diego, CA 92127 1--800-487 -0355 WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES REPORT OF COMPRESSION TEST PROJECT LOT 51 CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER PROJECT NO. 97-306 PROjECT ADDRESS 2091 RUTHERFORD ROAD, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR KOLL CONSTRUCTI'ON -ARCHITECT/ENGINE~R WARE & MALCOMB ARHCITECTS/BURKETT & WONG BLDG. PERMIT NO. 962035 PLAN FILE NO. NIA ·sAMPLE 'DATA REPORT OF: -~CONCRETE OMORTAR 0GROUT 0PRISMS OH/S GROUT OoTHER PLACEMENT DATE ------~0~4~-~1=8~-~9~8:..--__ _ SUPPLIER ______ --:.;N=E=L=S=O=N:.,.....::S=L=O=AN==--- MIX NUMBER -------=5=5=2=-------- TYPE OF CEMENT ----=I=I'--------'-- ADMIXTURE WRDA 64 & CALCIUM TIME IN MIXER -'-------,--:5=3=<-=M=I=N..__ ___ _ CONC. TEMP 12° UNIT WEIGHT WET __ ___,N~/~A=-=------.....,...,. DATE RECEIVED IN LAB N/A MIX DESIGN PSI 3000 MIX DESCRIPTION ----~1~"---=R~O~C~K.,__ TICKET NUMBER 62647 SLUMP ----------~5~'-'---- PERCENT AIR ------~N~t~A~--- AIR TEMP. 750 UNIT WEIGHT DRY ----=N~t~A=----- MIX REQUIRED PSI (f'c) 3000 PSI@ 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY S. FLORES LOCATION OF PLACEMENT --=P=AN=E=L=-----==3~2,__~------------------- FIELD LAB IDENTITY NO. 5 82 6 83 28 84 28 85 H 86 DATE TESTED 04-~3-_98 04-24-98 05-16-98 05-16-98 LABORATORY DATA DIMENSIONS INCHES 6 X 12 6 X 12 6 X 12 6 X 12 .. TEST AREA SQ. INCHES 28.27 28.27 28.27 28.27 MAX LOAD POUNDS 74,000 75,000 109,500 110,500 ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM TEST METHODS *AClUAL MEASURED AREA C31, C39, C78, C138, C143, C172, C173, C231, C617, C1O64 DISTRIBUTION: OWNER. ARCHITECT, ENGINEER. CONTRACTOR. CITY. SUPPLIER COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH PSI 2620 2650 3870 3910 CHECKED BY: M Jrblk,J,, ,1 - y :i 6 ~9x'.'.' V REVIEWED BY: . ../,l,,,.U4,,~~t--t~~~~ DATE; DATE: S'-"2..,-18 17150 Via Del Campo Suite 307 San Diego, CA 92127 1--800-487-0355 WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES REPORT OF COMPRESSION TEST PROJECT . LOT 51 CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER PROJECT NO. 97-306 PROJECT ADDRESS 2091 RUTHERFORD ROAD, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR KOLL CONSTRUCTION· ARCHITECT/ENGINEER WARE & MALCOMB ARHCITECTS/BURKETT & WONG BLDG. PERM~T NO. 962035 PLAN FILE NO. N/A SAMPI.iE DATA REPORT OF: . ~CONCRETE OMORTAR QGROUT OPRISMs OH/S GROUT OoTHER PLACEMENT DATE 04-18-98 SUPPLIER -------=-==..a==----===-==-- MIX NUMBER------==-="---,---- NELSON SLOAN 522 TYPE OF CEMENT ASTM Cl50-II . ADMIXTURE WRDA 64 &.CALCIUM 42 MIN TIME IN MIXER--------=-='-=="----- CONC. TE:t1P 68° DATE RECEIVED IN MIX DESIGN PSI MIX DESCRIPTION TICKET NUMBER SLUMP PERCENT AIR AIR TEMP. UNIT WE~GHT WET N/A UNIT WEIGHT DRY MIX REQUIRED PSI (f'c) 3000 PSI @ 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY LAB N/A 3000 111 ROCK 62655 4 3/4" N/A N/A S. FLORES LOCATION OF PLACEMENT PANEL 27. -.._;.==~--=~--...c...--------------------- FIELD LAB IDENTITY NO. 5 87 6 88 28 89 28 90 H 91 DATE TESTED 04-23 ... 98 04-24-98 _05-16-98 05-16-98 LABORATORY DATA DIMENSIONS INCHES ·6 X 12 6 X 12 6 X 1~ 6 X 12 TEST AREA SQ. INCHES 28.27 28.27 28.27 28.27 MAX LOAD POUNDS· 71,500 77,000 95,500 100,000 ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM TEST METHODS *ACTUAL MEASURED AREA C31, C39, C78, C138, C:143, C172, C173, C231, C6171 C1064 COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH PSI 2530 2720 3380 3540 LABORATORY DATA REMARKS---------------~~~~~~~~,,~---- DISTRIBUTION: OWNER. ARCHITECT, ENGINEER, CONTRACTOR, CITY, SUPPLIER cH~CKED BY= M1k-t/.t&J:u . REVIEWED BY: . DATE: _.5, 26, 9X'.'.. . _ y DATE: 17150 Via Del Campo Suite 307 San Diego, CA 92127 1--800-487 -0355 WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES REPORT OF COMPRESSION TEST PROJECT LOT 51 CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER PROJECT NO. 97-306 PROJECT ADDRESS 2091 RUTHERFORD ROAD, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR KOLL CONSTRUCTION . . ARCHITECT/ENGINEER WARE & MALCOMB ARHCITECTS/BURKETT & WONG BLOG. PERMIT NO. 962035 PLAN FILE NO. N/A SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF: [~] CONCRETE D MORTAR D GROUT D PRISMS DH/ s GROUT D OTHER PLACEMENT DATE ----=-0~4-_1=7~-~9~8:a.-__,..-- SUPPLIER ------~N=E=L=S~O=N'--=S=L=O=AN=-- MIX NUMBER ------"'6~-=5=5=2~------ TYPE OF CEMENT --------=I=I~/-=C=1=5~0.,.----'-- ADMIXTURE WRDA 64 TIME IN MIXER ----=5=6~M=I=N:..:..-___ ___ CONC. TEMP N/A UNIT WEIGHT WET ---=N_,_/=A..__ ___ ____,_ DATE RECEIVED IN LAB -~N~/A=---- MIX DESIGN PSI 3000 MIX DESCRIPTION ----~5~-~5'--=S=K.a.-__ TICKET NUMBER 690774 SLUMP ---------~4:-..:1=/-2~'-'-- PERCENT AIR _________ N~L~A-'----- AIR TEMP. N/A UNIT WEIGHT DRY -----'N~L~A=---- MIX REQUIRED PSI (f'c) 3000 PSI @ 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY H. SARKANI LOCATION OF PLACEMENT BOTTOM 1/3 OF PANEL# 41. FIELD LAB IDENTITY NO. 5 92 7 93 28 94 28 95 H 96 DATE TESTED 04-22-98 04-24-98 05-15-98 05-15-98 LABORATORY DATA DIMENSIONS INCHES 6 X 12 6 X 12 6 X 12 6 X .1.2 TEST AREA SQ. INCHES 28.27 28.27 28.27 28.27 MAX LOAD POUNDS 75,000 76,500 120,000 118,000 ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM TEST METHODS *ACTUAL MEASURED AREA C31, C39, C78, C138, C143, C172, C173, C231, C617, C1O64 LABORATORY DATA REMARKS DISTRIBUTION: OWNER. ARCHITECT. ENGINEER. CONTRACTOR, CITY. SUPPLiER CHECKED BY: B,{J ?w/~ A . REVIEWED DATE: 5----J..&z.-Cf~ . y DATE: COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH PSI 2650 2710 4240 4170 WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES REPORT OF COMPRESSION TEST 17150 Via Del Campo Suite 307 San Diego, CA 92127 1--800-487-0355 PROJECT LOT 51 CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER PROJECT NO. 97-306 PROJECT ADDRESS 2091 RUTHERFORD ROAD. CARLSBAD. CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR KOLL CONSTRUCTION . . ARCHITECT/ENGINEER. WARE & MALCOMB ARHCITECTS/BURKETT & WONG BLDG. PERMIT NO. 962035 PLAN FILE NO. N/A SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF: [fil CONCRETE D MORTAR D GROUT D PRISMS DH/ s GROUT D OTHER PLACE~ENT DATE ----=-04~-~1-7=---~9~8=------DATE RECEIVED IN LAB --=N~/=A,__ __ _ SUPPLIER _______________ N=E=L=S~O ___ N _____ S-L-O ___ AN=·--MIX DESIGN PSI 3000 MIX NUMBER ·----------=6:...---=5::;.:5::;.:2=--------MIX DESCRIPTION 5.5 SK ----~-=----==--- TYPE OF .CEMENT II/C150 TICKET NUMBER 690674 ADMIXTURE · WRDA 64 SLUMP -----------=4=--"----- TIME IN MIXER 72 MIN PERCENT AIR ------=N~/=A ___ _ CONC. TEMP N /A AIR TEMP. N /A UNIT WEIGHT WET N/A UNIT WEIGHT DRY ___ __,N=/~A=---- MIX REQUIRED PSI (f'c) 3000 PSI@ 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY H. SARKINI LOCATION OF PLACEMENT RIGHT 1/3 OF PANEL# 45 .. FIELD LAB IDENTITY NO. 5 97 7 98 28 99 :28 100 H 101 DATE TESTED 04-22-98 04.-24-98 05-15-98 05-15-98 LABORATORY DATA DIMENSIONS INCHES. 6 X 12 6 X 12 6. X 12 6 X 12 TEST AREA SQ. INCHES 28.27 28.27 28.27 28.27 MAX LOAD POUNDS 77,000 80,500 119,500 121,000 ALL SAMPLING· AND TESTING PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM TEST METHODS *ACTUAL MEASURED AREA C31,.C39, C78, C:138, C143, C172, C173, C231, C617, C10M DISTRIBUTION: OWNER, ARCHITECT, ENGINEER, CONTRACTOR, CITY, SUPPLIER CHECKED BY: e.f~ X DATE: S-~~~9K' REVIEWEO BY: · DATE: S-'2.""?-1) COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH PSI 2720 2850 4230 4280 WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES REPORT OF COMPRESSION-~EST 17150 Via Del Campo Suite 307 San Diego, CA 92127 1 ~aoo-487 -0355 PROJECT LOT 51 CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER PROJECT NO. 97-306 PROJECT ADDRESS 2091 RUTHERFORD ROAD, _CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR_ KOLL CONSTRUCTION . ARCHITECT/ENGINEER -WARE & MALCOMB ARHCITECTS/BURKETT & WONG BLDG. PERMIT NO. 962035 PLAN FILE NO. N/A S1'?«PLE: DATA REPORT OF: [fil CONCRETE D MORTAR D GROUT D PRISMS DH/ s GROUT D OTHER PLACEMENT DATE 04-17-98 SUPPLIER ------'---...,...-N=E=L=S~O=N"'--"S=L=O=A=N---- MIX NUMBER -----------"6~-=5~5~2'------ TYPE OF CEMENT ---~I=I=/~C=l=5~0 ______ _ ADMIXTURE WRDA 64 TIME IN MIXER ----~7~4:--=M=I=N'------ CONC. TEMP N/A DATE RECEIVED IN LAB -~N~/A=---- MIX DESIGN PSI 3000 MIX DESCRIPTION 5.5 SK -----=---=---=='---- TICKET NUMBER 690560 SLUMP ---------~5~"----- PERCENT AIR ------=N~/=A:...-__ _ AIR TEMP. N/A UNIT WEIGHT WET N/A UNIT WEIGHT DRY ----=N~/=A:...-__ _ MIX REQUIRED PSI ( f 'c) LOC~TION OF PLACEMENT 3000 PSI @ 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY ---=H:..,..,--=S=A=RKAN==I'-- FIELD LAB IDENTITY NO. 7 102_ 28 ._103 28 104 5 105 H 106 DATE TESTED 04-24-98 05-15-98 05-15-98 04-22-98 LEFT l/3RD OF PANEL# 4. LABORATORY DATA: . . . DIMENSIONS INCHES 6 X 12 6 X 12 6 X 1_2 6 X 12 TEST AREA SQ. INCHES 28.27 28.27 28.27 -- 28.27 MAX LOAD POUNDS 79,000 110,000 112,500 69,000 ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM TEST METHODS *ACTUAL MEASURED AREA C~1, C39, C78, C138·, C143, C172, C173, C231, C617, C1064 LABORATORY DATA REMARKS DISTRIBUTION: OWNER. ARCHI.tECT. ENGINEER. CONTRACTOR. CITY. SUPPLIER CHECKED BY: BJ2 7w/m.,>:,q . -REVIEWED DATE: -s-aez~ ?&'. y DATE: COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH PSI 2790 3890 3980 2440 WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES RE~ORT OF COMPR~SSION TEST 17150 Via Del Campo Suite 307 San Diego, CA 92127 1 '-800-487 -0355 PROJECT LOT 51 CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER PROJECT NO. 97-306 PROJECT ADDRESS __ 2~0~9=1~R=U=T~H=ER=:...FO=R=D=-=R=O=A=D~,....__,C=AR=·=L=S=B=A=D~,.___,,C=A=L=I~F~O=RN=I=A=------- CONTRACTOR ----~K=O=L=L_C=O=N=S=T~R=U=C=T=I=O=N.:._ _____ ,--"------------- ARCHITECT/~NGINEER WARE & MALCOMB ARHCITECTS/BURKETT & WONG BLDG. PERMIT NO. 962035 PLAN FILE NO. N/A SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF: [filcoNCRETE OMoRTAR 0GROUT OPRisMs OH/s GROUT OoTHER PLACEMENT DATE 04-20-98 DATE RECEIVED IN LAB SUPPLIER NELSON SLOAN MJX DESIGN PSI MIX NUMBER 6-552 MIX DESCRIPTION TYPE OF CE:t,lENT II/C150 TICKET NUMBER ADMIXTURE WRDA 64 SLUMP TIME IN MIXER 72 MIN PERCENT AIR CONC. TEMP N/A AIR TEMP. UNIT W:EIGaT WET NIA UNIT WEIGHT DRY MIX REQUIRED PSI (f'c) 3000 PSI@ 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY LOCATION OF PLACEMENT FIELD J:,A:B IDENTITY NO. 4 107 7 108 28 109 2~ 110 H 11~ DATE TESTED 04-24-98 04-27-98 05-18-98 05-18-98 TOP 1l2' OF P:ANEL ti. 11 AND BOTTOM 1/2 LABORATORY DATA DIMENSIONS INCHES 6 X 12 6 X 12 6 X 12 6 x 12 . TEST AREA SQ. INCHES 28.27 28.27 28.27 28.27 MAX LOAD POUNDS 70,000 92,000 113,500 112,500 04-21-98 3000 5.5 SK 691150 4 3/411 N/A N/A N/A H. SARKANI OF· PANEL ti. 10. COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH PSI 2480 3250 4010 3980 ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM TEST METHODS *ACTUAL MEASURED AREA C31, C39, C78, C138, C143, \:172, C173, C231, C617, C1064 LABORATORY DATA REMARKS--------------'-------,,,,~~~~~----- DISTRIBUTION: OWNER. ARCHITECT. ENGINEER. CONTRACTOR. CITY. SUPPLIER CHECKED BY: fit 7~ 1 . REVIEWED BY:· DATE: S-;J.C,,,4r( r DATE: S-~""l-18 17150 Via Del Campo Suite 307 San Diego, CA 92127 1--800-487 -0355 WYMAN TESTING LABORATO-RIES REPORT OF COMPRESSION TEST PROJECT LOT 51 CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER PROJECT NO. 97-306 PROJECT ADDRESS 2091 RUTHERFORD ROAD. CARLSBAD. CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR ----~K=O=L=L::..-;:C~O=N~S~T=R=U~C=T=I~O=·N"--------------------- ARCHITECT/ENGINEER -a.:W=AR=E:........a:a&"-=MA=L=C~OM==B~A=RH=C=I=T=E~C=T=S-/~B~URK===E=T=T.___.&"--'-W~O=N~G"--------- BLDG. PERMIT NO. 962035 PLAN FILE NO. N/A SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF: ~CONCRETE OMORTAR 0GROUT 0PRISMS OH/s GROUT OoTHER PLACEMENT PATE 04~20-98 SUPPLIER --------------~-~N=E=L=S=O=N"--'S=L=O=A=N:.:.-_ MIX NUMBER ----,---"6~-~5~5~2=------- TYPE OF CEMENT ---~I=I=/~C=1=5~0.__ __ _ ADMIXTURE WRDA 64 TIME IN MIXER ----~6~1~M=I=N ____ _ CONC. TEMP N/A UNIT WEIGHT WET -------'N=-'-'/A:.:--,----~ MIX REQUIRED PSI (f'c) 3000 PSI@ 28 DAYS DATE RECEIVED IN MIX DESIGN PSI MIX DESCRIPTION TICKET NUMBER SLUMP PERCENT AIR AIR TEMP. UNIT WEIGHT DRY SAMPLES MADE BY LAB 04-21-98 3000 5.5 SK 691284 5 II N/A N/A N/A H. SARKANI LOCATION OF PLACEMENT RIGHT-1/4_OF PANE-L_#.18 AND·BOTTOM 1/2 OF PANEL FIELD LAB IDENTITY NO. 4 112 7 113 28 114 2a 115 H 116 DATE TESTED . ' 04-24-98 04-27-98 05-i8-98 05-18-9~ 16. LABORATORY DATA DIMENSIONS INCHES 6 X 12 -- 6 X i2 6 X: 12 6 X 12 TEST AREA SQ. INCHES ~rn. 21 _ 28. 27 28.27 ~8.27 MAX LOAD POUNDS 73,500 91,500 121,000 117,500 ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM TEST METHODS *ACTUAL MEASURED AREA _ C31, C39, C78, C138, C143, C172, C173, C231, C617, C1'O64 LABORATORY DATA REMARKS DISTRIBUTION: OWNER. ARCHITECT. ENGINEER._ CONTRACTOR, CITY, SUPPLIER COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH PSI 2600 3240 4280 4160 CHECKED BY: M ~>u ~ REVIEWED BY: · ~~~~~~~~ DATE: 5--;i.C...,'lx' '( DATE: S-'2.1-',S 17150 Via Del Campo Suite 307 San Diego, CA 92127 1-800-487 -0355 WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES REPORT OF COMPRESSION _TEST PROJECT LOT 51 CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER PROJECT NO. 97-306 PROJECT ADDRESS 2091RUTHERFORD ROAD,. CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR KOLL CONSTRUCTION . ARCHITECT/ENGINEER WARE & MALCOMB ARHCITECTS/BURKETT & WONG BLDG. PERMIT NO. 962035 PLAN FILE NO. N/A SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF: [fil CONCRETE D MORTAR D GROUT D PRISMS DH/ s GROUT D OTHER PLACEMENT DATE---------------=-=------------ SUPPLIER -------..,.----=~-----=-==~- MIX NUMBER-----------------"~--------.,..-,-- TYPE OF CEMENT ----=a=.-.-==~'----~ 04-21-98 NELSON SLOAN 6-1349 II/C150 ADMIXTURE WRDA 64 53 MIN. TIME IN MIXER --'----==:_:.=a-.....-----~ CONC. TEMP 6.4° DATE RECEIVED IN MIX DESIGN PSI MIX DESCRIPTION TICKET NUMBER SLUMP PERCENT AIR AIR TEMP. LAB 04-22-98 4000 6.5 SK 691525 5 1/211 2.0% UNIT WEIGHT WET 147.2 PCF. UNIT WEIGHT DRY N/A MIX REQUIRED PSI (f'c) 4000 PSI @ 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY H. SARKANI LOCATION OF PLACEMENT 5 ·112 11 s.o·.G. SECTION BET' E.5/1, E.25/1, E.5/2.5, AND E.25/2.5. FIELD LAB IDENTITY NO. 7 117 28 118 28 119 H 120 DATE. TESTED 04-28-98 05-19-98 05-19-98 LABORATORY DATA DIMENSIONS INCHES 6 X 12 6 X 12 ~ X 1,2 TEST AREA SQ. INCHES 28.27 .. 28.27 28.27 MAX LOAD POUNDS 107,500 140,500 139,000 ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM TEST METHODS *ACTUAL MEASURED AREA C31, C39, C78, C138, C143, C172, C173, C231, C617, C1064 LABORATORY DATA REMARKS DISTRIBUTION: OWNER. ARCHITECT. _ENGINEER. CONTRACTOR. CITY. SUPPLIER COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH PSI 3800 4970 4920 CHECKED BY= ao 2U r...t A REVIEWED BY= · ~U't4~~~~~~ DATE: 5-p.C:.-Cf. <[<". . __, \ DATE: 5-2-7-i 8 17150 Via Del Campo Suite 307 San Diego, CA 92127 1 a.800-487 -0355 WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES REPORT OF COMPRESSION TEST PROJECT LOT 51 CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER PROJECT NO. 97-306 PROJECT ADDRESS 2091 RUTHERFORD ROAD, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR ----=K=O=L=L=---=C=O=N=S=T=R=U=C=T=I=O~N,..._ __________________ _ . ARCHITECT/ENGINEER WARE & MALCOMB ARHCITECTS/BURKETT & WONG BLDG. PERMIT NO. 962035 PLAN FILE NO. N/A SAMPLE DAT.A REPORT OF: [R] CONCRETE D MORTAR D GROUT D PRISMS DH/ s GROUT D OTHER PLACEMENT DATE __ __,.__,.-==....._::;-=------ SUPPLIER ------~===--=-=::,=.:~- 04-21-98 NELSON SLOAN 6-i349 MIX NUMBER _____ _..:::;.....::.=...o'"'"----- TYPE OF CEMENT ----==-=::c..:::....-------II/Cl50 ADMIXTURE WRDA 64 54 MIN TIME IN MIXER----.=....:-=="------ CONC. TEMP 730 UNIT WEIGHT WET __ ___,1-4~7~·~2=-=P~C=F __ _ DATE RECEIVED IN LAB 04-22-98 MIX DESIGN PSI 4000 MIX DESCRIPTION 6.5 SK TICKET NUMBER 691659 SLUMP 4 II PERCENT AIR 2.0% AIR TEMP. UNIT WEIGHT DRY N/A MIX REQUIRED PSI (f'c) 4000 PSI @ 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY H. SARKANI LOCATION OF PLACEMENT 5 1/211 S.O.-G. SECTION BET·C.75/25, C.25/25, C.75/2.1, C.25/2.1 (APPROXIMATES) • FI}llLD LAB IDENTITY NO. 7 121 28 122 28 123 H 124 DATE TESTED 04-:-28-98 05-19-98 05-19-98 . LABORATORY DATA DIMENSIONS INCHES E;> X 12 6 X 12 6 X 12 - TEST AREA SQ. INCHES 28.27 28.27 28.;n MAX LOAD POUNDS 3=06,000 152,500 149,500 ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM TEST METHODS *ACTUAL MEASURED AREA C31, C39, C78, C138, C143, C172, C173, C231, C617, C1064 DISTRIBUTION: OWNER. ARCHITtJ:NGINEER: CONTRACTOR. CITY, SUPPLIER CHECKED BY: &f,]~;ru REVIEWED DATE: 5-'2.C, -9R: .. y DATE': BY: S'--2.a-·u COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH PSI 3750 5390 5290 17150 Via Del Campo Suite 307 San Diego, CA 92127 1-800-487 -0355 WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES REPORT OF COMPRESSION TEST PROJECT LOT 51 CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER PROJECT NO. 97-306 PROJECT ADDRESS 2091-RUTHERFORD ROAD, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR KOLL CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT/ENGINEER WARE & MALCOMB ARHCITECTS/BURKETT & WONG BLDG. PERMIT NO. 962035 PLAN FILE NO. N/A .SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF: [R).coNCRETE · OMoRTAR 0GROUT OPR:tsMs OH/s GROUT OoTHER PLACEMENT DATE 04-22-98 DATE RECEIVED IN LAB 04-23-98 SUPPLIER NELSON SLOAN MIX DESIGN PSI ____ __::4~0~0~0'----- MIX NUMBER 89~141 MIX DESCRIPTION ____ 7~.5:=;.......:S=K.:,.._ __ TYPE OF CEMENT II/V TICKET NUMijER 691997 APMIXTURE WRDA 64 & DARAVA!R SLUMP ---------~4~1~{~2~'-'-- TIME IN MIXER 82 MIN PERCENT.AIR ------~5~2~o ___ _ CONC. TEMP 71° AIR TEMP. 4.0 UNIT WEIGHT WET 144.9. UNIT WEIGHT DRY NIA MIX REQUIRED PSI (f'c) 4000 PSI @ 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY H. SARKANI LOCATION OF PLACEMENT ---=-T=O=-P-=1.,_/ =-2 _O=F=-·---=P=-=AN=E=L=-·..,,#--=5:;..::0'-',---"'AN=Dc....=B=O=T=T=O=M---=L=E=F=T--=1'-'-/=8--=-O-=-F-- PANEL # 51. FIELD LAB IDENTITY NO. 5 125 7 126 28 127 28 128 H 130 DATE TESTED 04-27-9~ 04-29-98 05-20-98 05-20~98. LABORATORY DATA DIMENSIONS INCHES q X 12 6 X 12 6 X 12 6 X 12 TEST AREA SQ. INCHES 28.27 28.27 28.27 28.27 MAX LOAD POUNDS 112,000 134,000 151,000 155,000 ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM TEST METHODS *ACTUAL MEASURED AREA C31, C39, C78, C138, C143, C172, C173, C231, C617, C1O64 DISTRIBUTION: OWNER. ARCHITECT. ENGINEER •. CONTRACTOR. CITY. SUPPLIER CHECKED BY: af~n, r REVIEWED BY: . DATE: s-,;C.-Cff( . DATE: s-z:1-,rs COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH PSI 3960 4740 53.40 5480 17150 Via Del Campo Suite 307 San Diego, CA 92127 1-800-487 -0355 WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES REPORT OF COMPRESSION TEST PROJECT LOT 51 CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER PROJECT NO. 97-306 PROJECT ADDRESS 2 09_1 RUTHERFORD ROAD, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR KOLL CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT/ENGINEER WARE & MALCOMB ARHCITECTS/BURKETT & WONG BLDG. PERMIT NO. 962035 PLAN FILE NO. N/A f?AMPLE DATA REPORT OF: [fil CONCRETE D MORTAR D GROUT D PRISMS DH/ s GROUT D OTHER 04-11-98 PLACEMENT DATE ---~~=-.a....;..-__ _ SUPPLIER ----------==--a='--=-aa.==-- MIX NUMBER-------"--=------- NELSON SLOAN 515 TYPE OF CEMENT N/A N/A . . . ADMIXTURE . TIME IN-MIXER 61 MIN --'--'---=-=a....,==;,------ CONC. -TEMP N/A - DATE RECEIVED IN MIX DESIGN PSI MIX DESCRIPTION TICKET NUMBER SLUMP ·. ·: . -PERCENT AIR 1 ' -AIR TEMP. LAB 04-13-98 2500 N/A 689594 . 511 N/.A N/A UNIT WEIGHT WET- MIX REQUIRED PSI (f'c) LOCATION OF PLACEMENT -N /A . UNIT WEIGHT DRY ----=N,._,_/=A=----- 2500 PSI @ 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY -----'L=-=-. _V.:..::E=I=-=T=-=Z=MAN==-- G/LINE 1 BET LINES C-0 FOR WALL FOOTING. FIELD LAB IDENTITY NO. 7 73 28 74 .. 28 75 ·:a 76 . . . DATE TESTED 04-17-98 05-08-98 05-08-98 . LABORATORY DATA DIMENSIONS INCHES. 6 X 12 6 X 12 6 X 12 .. --~···--~----- --. - TEST AREA SQ. INCHES 28.27 28.27 28.27 .. . . ---.... ·-.. -- .. MAX LOAD POUNDS 68,000 87,000 88,000 .. ALL SAMPLI-NG AND TESTING PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM TEST METHODS · *AC1UAL MEASURED AREA C31, C39~ C78, C138, C143, -C1-72, C173, C231, C617, C1064 . . DISTRIBUTION: OWNER. ARCHITECT. ENGINEER. CONTRACTOR. CITY, SUPPLIER CHECKED BY: E).(! ~ A REVIEWED DATE: . S-Ii. -1: 'fC ~ DATE: $'-ftl-';5 COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH PSI 2400 3080 3110. . . I ~·.· ~IE Wyman Testing Laboratories 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE (619) 675-0270 0 FIELD WELDING . · 0 FIREPROOFING 0 SHOTC,RETE j COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH I REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 H. S. BOLTING D NDT 00THER tJ SHOP WELDING · INSPECTOR OF: : 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 D/B ANCHORAGE J~~~E5R.utherford Road No97-3Q6 I FOR WEEK ENDING May 8 19 98 O'1'.I~tO~T?,~ee~.l:1sbad Research Center BL~e"..S~~-I PLAN FILE NO. I ·c~lf-5"1.Ag~PE'€)<eR.Af el5"ar s & concrete AR'Wm'i_'e & Malcomb Architects DEF'e'f~~'eft)O psi I souR9,li@i ~'or!/ S 1 oan EN~i-Lo-Torres DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN; RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) GE~LF~Bti<sTf?f-uction 1 Concrete mix design #89-141 CO_t!l~?l~¥'8, WORK l . ~· ' . . :. .--LAEWyman Testing Laboratories .- ,, I I CONCRETE INSPECTION i 5-8-98 I I I A. Please note: the approved plans does not specify the minimum compressive strength of concrete I I Required for casting of 4 cylindrical columns described below. I Per Contractors approval 4,000 psi concrete is used. I Jt]: !" B. In~p~cted the placement and consolidation of 10.0 cubic yards i Of concrete into four cylindrical columns located east of the ,. ( bldg. ·At appro.xirnate grid.points J.75/1., D.75/1, D.4/1, and B/1; I whose :'r'ebars were inspected on 5-4-98. I I C. One set of 4 test cylinders was taken from the concrete load ! deliv~F~d by truck #306, ticket #696800, whose slump was 3-1/2". ! ·I D. To the best of my knowledge, the work inspected is in I accordance with approved plans & available specifications and the I I I applicable workmanship provisions of UBC. I I I I i I j:: I , • V. .: • :·c:l. I . ~ .. ' .. ,I.•\'_. I CLS 5-12'--98 Signed copy on file. Hossein F. Sarkani I ; ! ;: = : ~ :~ .l C > CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY1.THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I -HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & 3PECIFICATIONS,-AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. SIGNATURE OF REGlstERED INSPECToR DATE OF REPORT REGISTER NUMBER ::, .l :, Wyman Testing Laboratories . (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 FIELD WELDING . · 0 FIREPROOFING D SHOTCRETE REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 H. S. BOLTING D NDT 0 OTHER INSPECTOR OF 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 SHOP WELDING 0 D/B ANCHORAGE J~"91RERutherford Road No97-3Q6 I FOR WEEK ENDING May 8 19 98 o~~05!r?J~~IY.Al:'!§bad Research Center BL~e°..E~T3'5'. I PLAN FILE NO. C.2l._13'~-~'0<0YPgr~A£:B E1el:fue Steel AR'vfflfe & Malcomb Architects D~S!3 ST~_f,~ . . I SOURCE OR MFGR. ENffl§hi-Lo-Torres DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN, RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) GE~Fot!61\'ef~tuction E7018/smaw process, NR232 E71T-8, 0.072 COf!l1f~ ~l§Q.f'B~~-Whitacre Wire/fcaw process LAEWyman Testing Laboratories ... . · FIELD WELDING INSPECTION 5-8-98 A. Visually inspected the field welding of the following connections: 1. The¾" column to beam conn. Plates at grid point E/3 per detail 6/SD...:7. 2. The.~/8" conn. Plate between W21x44 grid I56.int E/2, per detail and W24x68 beams at approx. 5/SD-7. 3. the ::p1 3/8x4"x15" to W21x44 beam at approx. grid point D.5/2, per .deta_il 14/SD~4, and similarly at approx. grid point C.5/2. 4. Two, pl ½"x6"x11" ~/3/4" gusset plates (joist girder's seats) to north ··taces of embed plates in panels 12 & 15 at grid points A.2/3 & A.1/4; in addition to their two knife plate (pl 7/8"x7"xl2") all according to details: 8 & 9/SD-6, except that detail 8/SD-6 does not r~p,:i::·esent the "actual panels" configurations, and detail 9/SD- 6 does not show welding of the knife plates to joist girder's seat(s). However, all info/clarity was verbally obtained from the engineer and revised details are to follow for records.- 5. The· truss girder to girder splicing knife conn. Plates (pl l"x3"~1'-8") at top of pipe columns on line 6 per detail 2/SD-3. B. Co311p~eted welds were inspected for size, length, location and to th§;.-_ _-best of my knowledge are free of visible defects and in accor0ance with the referenced details & specifications. I :~ .. CLS 5-12-98 Signed copy on r; '• file. Hossein F. Sarkani .. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE SIGNATURE OF l~EGlsfEHED INsPECIOR I HEREBY CERTIFY JHAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I' HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. DATE OF REPORT REGIStER NUMBER Wyman . Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 FIELD WELDING . · 0 FIREPROOFING D SHOTCRETE REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 H. S. BOLTING D NOT D OTHER [] SHOP WELDING INSPECTOR OF 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 D/B ANCHORAGE J~&9~E~utherford Road No97-306 I FOR WEEK ENDING May 8 1998 0~~ 0 51Rfj-~&~bad Research Center BL~~teY3~· I PLAN FILE NO. C1Ji.CS>W· ~·e~Pgf~A~ Eietfue steel ARWtFll & Malcomb Architects D~§!3 ST,j:!p"f§' I SOURCE OR MFGR. EN~~'sfii-Lo-Torres DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESI_GN. RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) GE~113_C~§ffuction E7018/smaw process, NR232 wire E71T-8 CCSJ3.,~ '5~f j\S'~'1) • Const. Welding 0.072 'fcaw process LA~yman Testing Laboratories ·. FIELD WELDING INSPECTION 5-7-98 A. Visually inspected the field welding of the following connections: 1. Ledger's splice connection plates (pl l-l/8"x3"x20") at panels joints between the following panels, according to detail 10/SD-3: A. On line 7, between G & K, for panels: 32,33,34,35,36,37,38 & 39. B. On line K, between 7 & 2.5, for panels: 40,41,42,43,44,45,46, & 47. c. On line A, between 6 & 7, for panels: 19 & 20. 2. The. _:j:J;3'~x3"x3/8"x6" to panels 48 & 49 embed plates per detail 10/SD-2. 3. The·· Pl 3/8"x6"x6" bent.with approx. 8.791 degree angle to panels 46 & 47 embed ,plates immediately below the ledger elevation per detail 10/Sd-2, except -.;th1:1-t 90 degree bent angle as shown on this detail is impractical. 4. The _,PL': 3/8"x6"x6" plate at corner embeds of panel~-39 & 40 per 11/SD-2. 5. The·:.pl 3/8"x6"x6" plate at corner embeds of panels 20 & 21 per 11/SD-2. 6. two TS12"xl2"x3/8" inverted V braces to W24x68 beams ¾" gusset plate, and one½" stiffener plate to W24x68 beam at roof elev. At grid point E/5.5; and similarl.y:, at grid point E/4.5, all on "north face" of the beams on line E, betwee~, 1,5 & 6 per detail l/SD-5 (REF. Deta;Ll A/SD-5). 7. The·'¾'' columns to beams conn. Plates at grid points E/5 & E/4 per detail 6/SD-7. :i3. Completed welds were inspected for size, length, location and to the best of my knowledge are free of visible defects and in accordance with the referenced details and specifications. :; . ' . . . .. ~ l·, :.: ·:· ,. t I t.J L.Ci i. :. 1:: f I.:. i:: (. CLS s-i2-98 Signed copy on file. Hossein F·. Sarkani , ... , t· .. ·:,l :=. . i: /:: i· CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE SIGNAi ORE OF REGISIERED INSPEctoR I HEREBY CERTIFinrHAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOT~D I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS;·AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. .. , .. • 1:1 DATE OF REPORT REGISTER NUMBER . ~ ·; Wyman Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH O REINFORCED CONCRETE REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL O PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 FIELD WELDING : 0 FIREPROOFING 0 H. S. BOLTING O NDT INSPECTOR OF O REINFORCED MASONRY t?A.~ Sf5111Ye!'I I SOURCE OR MFGR. 0 SHOP WELDING O D/B ANCHORAGE No97-3Q6 I FOR wEEK May 8 ENDING BL~~~~-I PLAN FILE NO. ARW£fif & Malcomb Architects EN~~'hi-Lo-Torres DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN, RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) GE~1LF~5'd§Tf?.l:uction E7018/smaw process, NR232 E71T-8, 0. 072 c~I<~~~~!e~ctors Inc. Wire/ f caw' pr?.ces·s LAWyman Testing Laboratories FIELD WELDING INSPECTION .PAGE 1 OF 2 5-6-98 0 SHOTCRETE 0 OTHER A. Visually inspected the field welding of the following connections: 1. Two TS6"x6"x3/8" inverted "V" braces to W24x55 beam's¾" thick gusset plate, and one½" thick stiffener plate to W24x55 beam all -on "sqqt;h" face" of the beam on line F, between 1. 5 & 2. O per detai.t 1·'1/SD-5 (ref. Detail C/SD-5). 2. One ·.:Ts 12"x12"x3/8" brace to W12x65 column's ¾" thick gusset plate :·at-grid point E/ 4, and one TS12"xl2"x3/8" to W12x65 columns · ¾" thlqk gu·sset plate at grid point E/6; both per detail 7 /SD-5 (ref. =·netail A/ SD-5) . 3. Two TS12"xl2"x3/8" inverted "V'' braces to . W24x68 beams ¾" gusset".:plate, and one ½" stiffener plate to W24x68 beam at roof elev. ::At grid point E/5.5, and similarly at grid point E/4.5, all on "south face" of the beams on line E, between 4,5 & 6 per detail 1/SD.5 (ref. Detail A/SD-5). B. Noticed, informed the contractor, and requested for info on the following discrepancies: 1. Three TS12"x12"x3/8" (2 intersecting at E/5' W12x65 column & one at E/4 are slotted between 4-'-1/4" to 6-1/2" beyond the edge of colurnq~_·_:1 gusset plates,. where detail 7 /SD-5 specifies 1-1/2" maximµII,!._: . ... • , 'i' ... • J ()1.1 t: CLS 5---12-98 l. .. Signed copy on file. Hossein F. Sarkani pg. 1 r:, r CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE IN! • I HEREBY CERTIP{THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NdTE°D 1 HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS,-AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. J.;I:; SIGNAT@E OF REGISTERED INSPEC fOR DATE OF REPORT REGISTER NUMBER Wyman ~ ~_:_ \=1 . . Testing Laboratories (619) 675~0270 ·,. D SHOTCRETE COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 FIELD WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING !'• 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 H. S. BOLTING 0 NOT 0 OTHER REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 SHOP WELDING 0 D/B ANCHORAGE J~iRERutherford Road No97-306 I FOR WEEK ENDING May 8 19 98 qy~~ oSI~°:J~M~ad Research Center BLD9€f~Jl,5>· I PLAN FILE NO. cROO· !A-S@OVPg.i:"~ACE, Ef§:fue steel AR<m!¥e & Malcomb Architects D.¥£§,l3S~~ . I SOURCE OR MFGR. ENffl§hi -Lo-Torres DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN. RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) GEINM-f0 m!3ffst~uction E7018/smaw process, NR232 E71T-8, 0. 07~ COBf_i~ R~~q WORK Wire/ f'caw .. process LASWyman Testing Laboratories -·· ,, ' _..., FIELD WELDING INSPECTION _Page 2 of 2 . 5-6-98 B. 1. If corrections are required, please provide a detailed sketch. 2. The slotted TS 12"xl2"x3/8" intersecting W12x65 columns gusset plate at east Face" of grid point E/5, has a gap of up to 3/8" with .t;h.Er-face of gusset plate which requires correction, before 5/16" ··fi'1let welds as shown on detail 7/SD-5 can be provided. A singl:e-bevel-groove welds with "TC-U4A" joint designation and 30 degreecgroove angle may be ·appropriate (including steel backing) ·befor~E: the final weld, per detail 7/SD-5. Please advice. C. Completed welds were inspected for size, length, location and to the:.::best of my knowledge are free of visible defects and in accordance with the referenced details & specifications, except as --I, ,,, • • noted on section B of this report. :, '.l I "t' ... .. . . .. .... .. ___ j, ... •• ! I;; CLS 5....:12-98 Signed copy on file. Hossein F. Sarkani pg . 2 ....... ·1 I :: .. :, , .. , CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE _, ... , SIGNAIDRE OF REGISTEl~ED INSPECTOR I HEREBY CERJJFYJHAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTE ·I-HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. bATE OF REPORT REGISTER N0MBEi~ •, • 'J Wyman Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 FIELD WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING D SHOTCRETE REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 H. S. BOLTING 0 NOT D OTHER INSPECTOR OF 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 SHOP WELDING 0 D/B ANCHORAGE J~fR'=.Ffu.therford Road Nc97-306 I FOR WEEK ENDING May 8 19 98 oiYeJ'E '!if~?~~Ml>§bad Research Center BL(!f6~re)':3~· I PLAN FILE NO. CR!3~· !15f~OVPg,:f>~A£B, Ef.<ube steel A~Tfle & Malcomb Architects Dl£!y31 Sj!3~~ · I SOURCE OR MFG.R. ·EN~~~fli-Lo-Torres 'DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN. RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) GE:!:{f61_9._C~ffi'l§ffucti On E7018/smaw process,.NR232 E71T-8, 0.072 c~1~ '5~~!£Y'Sfi'D. Const. Wire/fcaw· pro,_c;::es·s LAWyman Testing Laboratories ,. / FIELD WELDING INSPECTION 5,-,5-98 A. Visually inspected the field welding of the following connections: 1. Ledger splice connection plates· (PL 1-1/8"x3"x20") at pa_nels joints between the following panels on line 7, between A & G, according to detail 10/SD-3: panels: 21,22~~~!24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31, & 32. 2. Two ::TS6x6"x3/8" inverted "V" braces to W24x55 beam's ¾" thick gussetcplate, and one ½" thick stiffener pl9-te to W24x55 beam all on "horth face" of the beam on line F, between · 1 . 5 & 2.0, per :I·· detail.l/SD-5 (ref. Detail C/SD-5). B. Completed welds were inspected for size, length, location and to the .:,best of my knowledge are free of visible defects and in accordance with .. ~ r. ' .,, the referenced details & specifications. C. Due to rain, all welding operations were stopped and the scheduled work was cancelled for remainder of the day. No further inspections· were performed. ,·, ,:, • r:-,h-. NO ') o, ct.:. r··1f ..... -·, :,T. , ... , , ' r ~" ., • CLS 5...:12-98 Signed copy on file. Hossein F. Sarkani .. . , .. . ' .. . ., ., CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE ., I ,I• , I HEREBY CERTI.FY'.TtfAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED· I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIO~~-~~D APPLICABLE SECTIONS. slGNAfDRE OF REGISTERED INsPEctOR DATE OF REPORT REGISTER NUMBER .• ! : .... Wyman ~~ . 1E Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 FIELD WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING D SHOTCRETE REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 H. S. BOLTING 0 NDT D OTHER INSPECTOR OF 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 SHOP WELDING 0 D/B ANCH9RAGE J~&9'IRE~utherf ord Road No97-306 I FOR WEEK ENDING May 8 19 98 0 ~~0 5~f~i:ea~~bad Research Center BL~Ef..E~T3'5'. I PLAN FILE NO. c~f>61RSV1-tj'r<ffP'6~R~el§~ts & concrete AR<m:It'e & Malcomb Architects DEF~6©:N~1g! i & 3 6 ks i _ I souRcE oR MFGR. EN~§hi-Lo-Torres ·DESCRIBE MAT't (MIX DESIGN, RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) GE~J?0 CIBffs€fuction COJ:J,T~f{>21~¥~WORK .. .. ' ---· LAEWyman Testing Laboratories .-· · ..... ' ... REINFORCING STEEL INSPECTION 5-4-98 A. Inspected the reinforcing steel installation for size, grade, lap, locations & clearances for 4 cylindrical columns located on east of bldg. At J.75/1, D.75/1, D.4/1, & B/1 (all approximate) . ,-,i-t·r. according details 10/SD-5, 11/SD-B. Re]jar·s were inspected to and 5, and :: column ties typical detail 1/SD.1. Based on the note on detail. 1/SD-1, requested. that #4 ties splices at top 18" of all columr,i,s. be ·placed at alternate corners (opposite sides for c'ylindr1.cal. columns). This is requested to maintain l" o.c. spacings between successive ties at their splice locations as required by UBC. C. Corrections as requested above was. made, and to the best of my knowledge, rebars installation at these columns is in accordance with the referenced details & specifications. .::-p:::, .. '.}' .. .. ~, .. ~ ··~ .. ~- CLS Sft4---98 Signed copy on file. Hossein F. Sarkani ,·l ·: . :(: 'j_ CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIP.{, THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOi'f:D I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIOt--!J:."'.-_!'!P APPLICABLE SECTIONS. SIGNAT@E OF REGISTERED INsPEC!OR DATE OF REPORT REGIS rER NUMBER Wyman Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 FIELD WELDING . 0 FIREPROOFING D SHOTCRETE REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 H. S, BOLTING D NOT D OTHER INSPECTOR OF 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 SHOP WELDIN$ 0 D/B ANCHORAGE J'2l~91iRE~utherford Road No97-3Q6 I FOR WEEK ENDING May 8 1998 0 ~~0 5i~0 J~~~ad Research Center BL~ef:2r-e)l3rs='· I PLAN FILE NO. c~f3>'&· ~'EJ'&fPg_r~A93. E~e steel ARm!Tfi! & Malcomb Architects D~.§!3STff_i!r,~ I SOURCE OR MFGR .. EN~~~&i-Lo-Torres DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN, RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) Ge~:ig_c~§ffuction E7018/smaw process CCSJi~ Jg~WORK -· LA~yman Testing Laboratories ... -· _./p. -· FIELD WELDING INSPECTION 5-4·-98 A. Verified the certified welders qualifications for WPS requirements of this project. B. The mill certifications for structural steel, pipe, and tube steels were not available on project site for verifications. was informed by Pacific Coast Iron that all HowevE1F-t',-= verbally certs ·'nave been submitted & kept at their files for this project, and tune steels are aSTM A500 grade B. Structural plan does not spec_i:By ,:tube steel materials·. c. vis"ually inspected the field welding of two TS 6"x6"x3/8" columns to footing embed plates, and two TS6"x6"x3/8" braces (inverted "V" chevron bracings) to th~ ¾" tube steel column gusset plates at grid points F/1.·5 & F/2 according to detail 8/SD.5 (ref. Detail C/SD-5) . D. Completed welds were inspected for size, length, location to the ·best of my knowledge are free of visible defects and accordance with the referenced details and specifications. CLS t';r: .. i~ t:~ij' :. ~ i. ~· .. . -... ·: --i 5-R.~_-98 ·:· 1·,. - ~ • ' I .~. ., Signed copy on file. Hossein F. Sarkani CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE slGNAt@E OF REGISTERED INSPEC I OR and in I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIO"!_~~:-':ND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. DATE OF REPORT REGISTER NUMBER .,.1 . A ,e r "" Wyman Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE [j FIELD WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING 0SHOTCRETE REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 H. S. BOLTING D NDT 0 OTHER INSPECTOR OF 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 SHOP WELDING 0 D/B ANCHORAGE. . J~91:t.RERutherford Road N097-3Q6 I FOR WEEK May 1 19 98 ENDING " ,. o~~0B~?JttS~r:t.Al:1§bad Research Center BLD~6".E12--0T3'5', I PLAN FILE NO. c.A.oo-~·e@l:1, GW©@cgr. 60 rebars, NR232 wj t~~ & Malcomb Architects ... D!f.':l~~~N~1sli & 60 ksi r~~!§ORMFGR. EN~§hi-Lo-Torres DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN, RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) GE~F°t!~fi<s"€~uction NR232 E71T-8, 0.072/FCAW process cosr~rP~R~8W§~uction Welding -NR-211 ··_;EjfT-ll, ---S/64/FCAW LAEWyman Testing Laboratories ,, ,• , FIELD WELDING INSPECTION 4-30-98 A. Verified the certified welders qualifications for WPS requirements of this·project. B. Visually inspected the field welding of the following connections: 1. Two ply3/4"xl-1/2"x16" to panels 7 & 8 embeds at 2 elevat;ibh.s per detail 12/SD-2, and one pl 1-1/8"x3"x20": to panels ledgers:: --per detail 10/SD--3. 2. One2~3"x3"x3/8"x6" long pe:r 10/SD-2 to panels 9 & 10 embeds. 3. Th.r.ee connections per details 12/SD-2, -19/SD-2, 10/SD-3. to panels_,;; 10 & .11. 4. One conn. Per detail 12/SD-2, & one conn. Per 10/SD-3 to panels 13 & 1'4:,T Note: conn per detail 19/SD-2 remains to be welded. 5 . 3 co~mJ:~ctions per details 12/SD-2 & 10/SD-3 to panels _16 & 17. 6. One· connection per detail 10/SD-3 to panels. 17 & 18 ledgers. 7. panels At 50 & 51: 8 connections 13/Sd-"2, (2x4 at ea. Side) per detail 4 connections (2x2 at ea. Panel end/side) per 16/SD-2, and 4 connections per detail 12/SD-2. 8. Three connections (2 per detail 12/SD-2 & 1 per detail 10/SD-3) per evf}~Y two panels joint, between panels: 5 & 4, 4 & 3, 3 & 2, and 2 & 1 joints. (: .. : J. r B. Co:rn11+ et ed welds were inspected for size, length, location and to the,-best of my knowledge are free of visible defects and in --R: o!.1 accor~0P:~e with referenced details & specifications. CLS 5..;.s,-98 .. .. , ), Signed copy on file. Hossein F . Sarkani ... ,:: .. ~ CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE M• 0 J• I HEREBY CERTIF.Y. THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NGTED r HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. SIGNAl@E Of REGistERED INSPECloR DATE Of REPORT REGISTER NUMBER EsGII_ Corporation Professional Pfun. !R._e.vie.w 'Engine~rs DATE: JAN 7, 1997 JURISDICTION: CARLSBAD D APPLICANT ~JURIS. ::> D FIRE CJ PLAN REVIEWER PLAN CHECK NO.: 96-2032 & 96-2035 (Formerly 96-1914) PROJECT ADDRESS: 2090 Rutherford & 2080 Faraday PROJECT NAME: Office/ Warehouse (Shell Only) CJ FILE SET:IV D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's ""'**uu*u codes. cg] The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. D The check list transmitted herewith ·is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. , D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. [8J The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Ware & Malcomb AIA 6640 Lusk Blvd., 205-C, San Diego, CA 92121 cg] Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. D Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Persoh contacted: Date contacted: (by: ) Telephone#: REMARKS: The applicant should insert the attached slip sheet sets into the plans at tt<e' no"' u building department. Please see attached for outstanding items. By: Ali Sadre Enclosures: Esgil Corporation 0 GA D CM D EJ D PC 12/31 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (619) 560-14<?8 + Fax (619) 560-1576 CARLSBAD 96-2032 & 96-2035 JAN 7, 1997 1. Justify unlimited area (60'-yards on all sides) for building# 2 with 1 O' side yard. 2. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plans have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soil report are properly incorpo_rated into the plans. 1· DATE: DEC 20; 1996 JURISDICTION: CARLSBAD EsGII Corporation Professional p[an. ~vi~w 'Ettpittl!ers 0 AP:egQANT ~ OFIRE 0 PLAN REVIEWER 0 FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: '96-2032 & 96-2035 (Formerly 96-1914) PROJECT ADDRESS: 2090 Rutherford & 2080 Faraday PROJECT NAME: Office/ Warehouse (Shell Only) SET:111 D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's """"""""",,,._ codes. D The plans transmitted herewith will substantially 'comply with the jurisdiction's "000""* codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. ~ The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. ~ ihe applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Ware & Malcomb AIA 6640 Lusk Blvd., 205-C, San Diego, CA 92121 ~-Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. D Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted: (by: ) Telephone#: ~ REMARKS: Please see attached for outstanding items. By: Ali Sadre Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA D CM D EJ D PC 11 /26 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (619) 560-1468 + Fax (619) 560-1576 J CARLSBAD 96-1914 DEC 20, 1996 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit three sets of revised prints, to the City of Carlsbad with a response list noting where all items are corrected on plans. 4. Justify unlimited area (60'-yards on all sides) for building# 2 with 1 O' side yard. 11.. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soil report are properly incorporated into the plans. 14. Note on plans the architect or engineer of record shall prepare a special inspection program with the stages of construction and the firms responsible for the special inspection, which shall be submitted to the building official for approval prior. to issuance of the building permit Please review Section 106.3.5. This is not the same as the special inspection list. 95. Please note where details 12/SD-3 & 17 /SD-4 are referenced on plans. 106. On 19/SO-2, delete the note: "start at third joint from each end of building". Expansion & contraction of the rebar is more critical than the panels. This detail should apply to all panel joints where ever there is rebar welding. 110. Provide a detail for the screen wall, on S-4, near grid point A1 & 7 . . 123. Show how you comply with the SAC interim guidelines. Detail 2/SD-5 still does not meet the SAC recommendations for OMF's. These guidelines recommend the use of additional (reinforcing) plates on top and bottom beam flanges to move the plastic hinge location from the face of the column and reduce the unreliability associated with the column flange through-thickness properties. Alternatively, show weak column/ strong ·beam provisions apply to this case, Sectiqn 2211.7.5, Exception. 127. See Section 1921.4.4 for the spacing of the ties in detail 10/SD-5 (i.e., 4". & 6", respectively) versus 6" & 12" as snown. Alternatively, show that they are not a part of the lateral force resisting system, so they should be designed for Section 1921. 7.2.2. Compliance with this Section was not demonstrated. 130. On detail 15/SD-4 & 3/SD-5 show how double angles interact with end plates. + The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 619/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Ali Sadre at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. DATE: OCT 21, 1996 JURISDICTION: CARLSBAD PLAN CHECK NO.: 96-1914 EsGH Corporation Professiona( Pfan $.f,view 'Engineers SET:I PROJECT ADDRESS: COLLEGE & FARADAY PROJECT NAME: OFFICE/WAREHOUSE (SHELL ONLY) CJ APPLICANT ~ DFIRE CJ PLAN REVIEWER D FILE D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's*********** codes. D The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's ********** codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. [8'.] The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D The applic~nt's copy of the check list is enclosed forthe jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. cg] The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: WARE & MALCOMB AIA 6640 LUSK BLVD-., 205 C, SAN DIEGO, CA 92121 cg] Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicaht that the plan check has been completed. D Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted: (by: ) Telephone #: D REMARKS: By: Ali Sadre Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA D CM [81 EJ D PC 10/7 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (619) 560-1468 + Fax (619) 560-1576 •'• . '.~! . CARLSBAD 96-1914 OCT 21, 1996 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION UST COMMERCIAL PLAN CHECK NO.: 96-1914 JURISDICTION: CARLSBAD OCCUPANCY: B-/S2 USE: OFFIGE/WAREHOUSE (SHELL) TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN ACTUAL AREA: 150, 15.9 / 108,863 ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA: UNLIMITED STORIES: SPRINKLERS?: Y REMARKS; DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: 10-11 DATE INITIAL Pl.AN REVIEW COMPLETED: OCT 21, 1996 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): HEIGHT: 28 OCCUPANT LOAD: VARIES DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 10/7 PLAN REVIEWER: Ali Sadre This plan review is limited to the te.chnical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws rElgulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled .. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections . based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Code sections cited are based on the 1994 UBC. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1994 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. LIST NO. 22, GENERAL COMMERCIAL WITHOUT ENERGY OR POLICY SUPPLEMENTS (1994 use) comforw.dot CARLSBAD 96-1914 OCT 21, 1996 1. Please make all corrections on the ·original tracings and submit two new sets of prints, to: Esgil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123;, (619) 560-1468. 2. Provide a Building Cod.e Data L.egend on the Title Sheet. Include the following code information for each ·building proposed: + Occupancy Group: Justify S-2 on cover sheet. S-1 s-eems more appropriate · for a shell building. + Description of Use: i.e., Office/ Warehouse + Height: 28' + Floor Area: Office= ...... ; Warehouse= ......... 3. Provide a note with the building data legend stating that yards used for area increases shall be permanently maintained. 4. Justify unlimited area for building # 2 with 1 O' side yard. Alternatively, verify with the city that it is lease line not be construed as a true property line. 5. Indicate on the litle Sheet whether or not a grading permit is required for this project. 6. Note on cover sheet all the tenant improvement work is under a separate permit and the building will not be occupied until a certification .of occupancy has been issued. 7. Provide a statement on the site plan stating: "All property lines, easements and buildings, both existing and proposed, are shown on this site plan." 8. . lhe exterior walls les.s than 20 · feet to a property line or an assumed property line, shall be one hour fire-rated construction. Section 503. Provide an ICBO or equal approval # for the infill material. between the panels that are less than 20' to property lines in building # 2. 9. , Glazing in the following locations should be of safety glazing material in accordance with Section 2406.4: a) Fixed anci sliding panels of sliding door assemblies and panels in swinging doors. b) Fixed or operable panels adjacent to a door where the nearest exposed edge of the glazing is within a 24-inch arc of either vertical edge of the d.oor in a closed position and where the bottom exposed edge of the glazing is less than 60 inches above the walking surface. CARLSBAD 96-1914 OCT 21, 1996 10. Provide skylight ICBO or other recognized approval listing. 11. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soil report are properly incorporated into the plans. 12. Note on the foundation plan that "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building Department foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the building -official in writing that: a) The building pad was prepared in accordc3nce with the soils report, b) The utility trenches have been .properly backfilled and compacted, and c) The foundation excavations comply with the intent of the soils report." 13. On the cover sheet of the plans, specify any items requiring special inspection, in a format similar to that shown below. • REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS In addition to the regular inspections, the following checked items will also require Special Inspection in accordance with Sec. 1701 of the Uniform Building Code. ITEM SOILS COMPLIANCE PRIOR TO FOUNDATION INSPECTION STRUCTURAL CONCRETE OVER 2500 PSI FIELD WELDING HIGH-STRENGTH BOLTS . EXPANSION/!=POXY ANCHORS REQUIRED? REMARKS ( detail # here) 14. Note Uie architect or engineer of record shall prepare a special inspection program with the stages of construction and the firms responsible for the special inspection, which shall be submitted to the building official for approval prior to issuance .of the building permit. Please review Section 106.3.5. 15. On the cover sheet of the plans, specify any items that will have a deferred submittal (trusses, etc.). Additionally, provide the following note on the plans, per Sec. 106.3.4.2: "Submittal documents for deferred submittal items shall be submitted to the architect or engineer of record, who shall review them and forward them to the building official with a notation indicating that the deferred submittal documents have been reviewed and that they have been found to be in general conformance with the design of the builoing. The deferred submittal items shall NOT be installed until their design and submittal documents have been approved by the building official." 16. On A-2.0f show a door and platform per elevation plans and structural plans near grid point E-7. CARLSBAD 96-1914 OCT 21, 1996 17. Show future door openings on shear wall, at grid line H, sheet A-2.0, per panel elevation plans. 18; Show guard rails and platform with steps on A-2.0, by doors 15 -17, per elevation plans. 19. The entry soffit column needs to be near grid point L-1, on sheet A-2.0, per structural plans. I.e., needs to move 5' to the left. 20. Show a column on A-2.0 at grid point E-1, per calculations. 21. Show WF columns on A2.2, near grid points E-1.5 & E-1.9 .. 22. Detail 3/A5.0 as referenced on 3/A-3.0, near grid line B, is incorrect. 23. · Details 1, 2, 4/A5.1 as referenced on 1/A-3.1 are incorrect. There are no such details on plans. 24. Detail 3/A5.0 as referenced on 1/A-3.1, near grid line B, is incorrect. 25. Doors 7 and 1 are missing on 1/A-3.1 near grid lines B & J, per floor plans. 26. Details 2 & 7/A-5.0 as referenced on 2/A-3.1 ate incorrect. 27. Detail 3/A-5.0 as referenced on 3/A-3.1 .is incorrect. 28. There is no door near grid line 1 per floor plans versus that shown on 4/A-3.1. 29. Where are details 6 & 7/A-4.2 on plans as referenced on A-4.0? 30. Label all the entry details on A-4.2 and reference them on plans. 31. There are two detail 6 on A-5.1, clarify. 32. Please show attachment of the curtain board to the joists on detail D/A-5.1. 33. Label the blank detail on 20/A-8.0. 34. Remove the entry columns on A-2.0, grid lines F & G, in line with door # 4, per structural. 35. Remove the store front column in the corner, near grid point A-1, on A-2.1, per structural. CARLSBAD 96-1914 OCT 21, 1996 36. Remove the columns on architectural plans (A-2.2) at grid points D-2 and D.5 -2 per structural plans. 31. Remove the mezzanine column from sheet A-2.2, near E-1, per structural. 3R Distinguish between details 2 & 3/SD-2 when referencing on foundation plans. As shown detail 2/SD-2 is not referenced on foundation plans . . 39. There is no door near grid point J-?'as indicated on S-2. 40. Show a WF column per mezzanine plan near grid point L-1, on S-2. 41. Show stair/ platform footings outside rear door on S-2 per architectural plans. 42. The note on item # 2 is not legible on S-2. 43. On footing schedule please clarify 124" base plate size for item# 6. 44. Show tie downs on foundation plans for all the panel returns such as panel 1 on S-2. 45. Clarify 4" GB width under shear wall on S-2, grid line 2. 46. Clarify the 3' pour strip under shear wall on grid line H, sheet S-2. How does this strip interact with detail 7/SD-2 and what is its exact depth or reinforcing? 47. There should be no wall on S-3, near grid point A-2.5, at entry. 48. The layout of panels # 33 through 35 as shown on 5,.4 do not match the panel elevations and architectural plans. 49. There is no door on architectural plans near grid point G-7, versus that on S-4. 50. Designate the tie beam on S-4 between lines 2 & 3 near grid line B. 51. The WF columns near grid line B.2 onS-4 should be equally spaced per B/SD-5. 52. Show a column at grid point C.5 -2 on S-A per brace frame elevation plans. 5.3. Show.a column on S-4 at grid poi11t F-1. 54. , Show columns on S-4 at store front on grid lines D.5, E & E.5 all near line 1. CARLSBAD 96-1914 OCT 21, 1996 55. $how a WF column on S-4 near grid point 8.5 -1 for the soffit above. 56. Provide a section through the entry concrete columns showing complete top and bottom connection details. 57. On S-5, bldg. 1 mezzanine plan, remove the corner column near grid point L-1. 58. On mezzanine plan of building 1, show a column at grid point E-1, sheet S-5. 59. On mezzanine plan of building 2, show a column on grid point F-1, sheet S-5. 60. On S-5, mezzanine plan of building 2, (mezzanine) brae~ mid-column near grid line B, should lines-up with line 1.5, per foundation plans. Please clarify. o1. Show steel beam designations on building 2 mezzanine plans, sheet S-5, i.e., line 8.5, etc. ·62. Show floor joist size and spacing on building 2 mezzanine plans on S-5. q3. Show F8-6 to the concrete wall connection details on S-5 at building 2 mezzanine plans, near grid point D.5 -2. -64. Show details and references for the column sitting on the beam per mezzanine plans of building 2 on S-5, lir.te D.5. 65. F8-21 should be W16x instead of W26 x per calculations, on sheet S-5, building 2 mezzanine plans. 66. Show 3/4" plywood sheathing on S-6 per calculations. 67. Show on S-6, what is the extent of application of detail 4/SD-3. I.e., specify sub- diaphragm details extend 32', or 4-bays minimum, etc. Similarly, on all other roof framing sheets. 68. On S-6, clarify detail xx/SD-3 at grid point N-4. 69. Detail 5/SD-6 as referenced on line H, sheet S-6, is incorrect. 70. What is the 3' dimension as noted on lir.ie 1, sheet S-6, at the perimeter between lines F & F.5? Also at these locations it is noted ts 5x5 typical, versus one TS shown on the foundation plans. CARLSBAD 96-1914 OCT 21, 1996 71. Show adequate drags connection details with references at the walls with returns similar to panel 1 (on S-6) at the roof line; unless it can be shown that rocking "(not shear) capacity of such return walls govern their response. ' 72. . There is no foundation for the column shown on S-6 near grid point L-1. 73. There is no foundation for the column shown on. ·$-6 near grid line M.5 -2, where the roof jogges. 7 4. Show the wall in detail 8/SD-6 as referenced on S-6 near grid point M-3 is adequate for the gravity loads. Provide adequate wall longitudinal reinforcement with ties to support the girder loads at this location. Similarly, for the girder at grid point M.5 -2. · 75. Where is A/S-6 as referenced on S-7 near grid line C-5? 76. Show E on the diaphragm nailing schematics on S-8. 77. Provide roof openings details and references on plans. 78. A/SD-5 as labeled on S-8, near grid pojnt F-6 is extra. 79. Show boundary nailing on S-8, on line A.1 continuing to line 4. Similarly, for that on line A.2 to continu~ to line 3, or line 8.1 continue to line 2. 80. On detail A of WP-1, pr;1nel with pilaster at openings, show bottom of the panel is continuous. 81. Note where details K, L, M & N/ WP-1 are referenced on plans. 82. Specify the width of piers on detail G/ WP-1. 83. The tie spacing of G/ WP-1 should be 4" o.c. for top and bottom and 6" o.c. the remaining. They qualify as column that are a part of the force resisting system. Section 1921.4.4. 84. All the piers per D/WP-1 should have 6" o.c. ties per Section 1921.6.12. 85. Show return panel typical reinforcing layout with details and references on plans. 86. Identify on all wall panels what the required chord forces are (bar size & #) so they can be maintained per detail 20/SD-2 at joints. .CARLSBAD 96-1914 OCT 21, 1996 87. Provide a detail through the piers on WP-4, between lines# 4 & 5. 88. Detail 11/SD-6 as referenced on shear wall panels 62 & 63 on WP-6 are incorrect.. 89. Details 5/SD-2 and 8/SD-6 as referenced oli WP-6, panels 62 & 63 are incorrect. 90. Show piers on WP-6 for shear panels # 62 & 63 at the openings, per calculations page FL5. 91. Where .is detail 15/SD-4 as referenced on Wp-6 at top corner of all panels ? 92. · On WP~?, the grid line J should be I for panel# 1. 93. On WP-8, there is no door adjacent to grid lihe G in panel 33 per architectural plans and also the location of this door does not match the foundation plans. 94. Note where details 14 -17 and 19 & 20iSD-1 are referenced on plans. 95. Please note where details 6, 15, 22/SD-2 are referenced on plans. 96. Show the max height of the retaining wall on detail 5/SD-2. ·97_ Note on detail 7/SD-2, the dowel size and spacing to match the longitudinal reinforcement. 98. Specify length of the anchor bolts on 8/SD-2. 99. Where is the 5/8" plate per detail 15/SD-2, in the right bottom corner? 100. The 7" dimension on detail 17/SD-2 should be 8'' per detail 16/SD-2. 1-01. The 5/16" weld on detail 17 /SD-2 should be 3/8 "per 17 /SD-2. 102. Where is the outline of the 14" plate on detail 17 /SD-2 per detail 16/SD-2 ? 103. Where is the outline of the 12" plate on detail 16/AD-2 per detail 17 /SD-2 ? 104. Please note where. detail 18/SD-2 is referenced on plans. This detail is different from 8/SD-5 in the length of the anchor bolt return (6" versus 12") and no additional' plate below the brace column. 105. Show the base plate to the footing plate weld size and type on 18/SD-2. CARLSBAD 96-1914 OCT 21, 1996 106. On 1.9/SD-2, delete the note regarding the bond breaking detail for every third panel. This detail applies to all panel joints where ever there is rebar welding. 107. Clarify what A is on detail 20/SD-2. Show it graphically on this detail. 108. Provide a schedule on the general specifications sheet for all the rebar to plate welding, per 21/SD-2, covering all the various bar sizes per different details on plans. 109. Show the nailer plate information with bolt size and spacing for roof joists on i.e. detail 5/SD-3. · 110. Note the size -of the stabilizing plate on detail 15/SD-3 or reference to another detail for this information. Similarly, for dE3~ail 18/SD-3. 111. Note whete detail 13/SD-~ is referenced on plans. 112. Show the outline of the 4 MB's on 18/SD-3 for the cap plate (as noted). 113. Specify 6" instead of 8" for plate size on detail 18/SD-3. 114. Show plate welding to the anchor bolts on detail 7/SD-3. 115. Show how the continuity of the L5x ledger is maintained on detail 7/SD-3 with the 3x nailer plate over the joists (per detail 5/SD-3). 116. Please note where details 1, 6, 16 & 18/SD-4 are referenced on plans. 117. Show information for the plates to be welded to the rebar on detail 5/SD-4. 118. Clarify 3 plates shown versus 4 noted on detail 14/SD-4. 119. On detail 9/SD-4, show the joists snug against the ledger. As shown, it implies there is a gap between them. 120. Cross reference detail 14/SD-6 on A/SD-5 instead of B/SD-5. 121. Show a detail similar to 14/SD-6 on both B & C/SD-5. 122. Note on C/SD-5, detail 2/SD-4 is typical. 123. Show how you comply with the SAC interim guide lines. Detail 2/SD-5 does not meet the UBC or SAC recommendations for OMF's. CARLSBAD 96-1914 OCT 21, 1996 124. Show the extension of the beam beyond the column on 2/SD,..s. 125. Where is the 3/4" plate by 1/2" per note on 8/SD-5, as required ? 126. Show all the column of frames (both BF's and MF's) and their anchorage are designed for the load combinations of Section 2211.5.1. 1.27. See Section 1921.4.4 for the spacing of th'e ties in detail 1 0/SD-5 (i.e., 4" and 6") versus what is shown. Alternatively, if it can be shown that they are not a part of the lateral force resisting system they should be designed for Section 1921.7.2.2. 128. Show 4 # B's are for what length on detail 9/SD-5. 129. Please note Where details 6 & 13/SD-6 are referenced on plans. 130. On detail 3/SD-6, the 3/16" weld is pointed to the wrong location. 131. Clarify the note"@ 3/4" clear" on detail 3/SD-6. 132. Show welding on detail 6/SD-6 for the top plate .. 133. Show welding of the knife plate to the girder on detail 12/SD-6 for continuity ties between girders. 134. Show welding of the A:B.'s on 12/SD-6 to embedded plates with the required edge clearance of the A.B.'s. 135. The number of bars and their length (3 # 7x 6') as noted on 8/SD-6 do not match those shown on details 9 & t0/SD-6. Please . review all three details for consistency. 136. Please see attached for outstanding electrical items. 137. To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page,. etc. 138. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: CARLSBAD 96-1914 OCT 21, 1996 D Yes O No 139. The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 619/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Ali Sadre at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. + ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW + 1993 NEC + JURISDICTION: Carlsbad + PLAN REVIEW NUMBER: 96-1914 + PLAN REVIEWE:R: Eric Jensen DATE: 10/21/96 1. Building 2 has an inaccessible meter section (the one to the right of the underground pull section). 2. The service entrance conductors do not have a 1 0 foot length limit as feeder tap conductors have, the services merely have to be grouped .. Removing the 10 foot limitation will giv~ some flexibility in layout in the electric rooms. 3. Address the following: the AIC rating of the house service, the type of main fuses used at both locations (Buildings 1 & 2), and. the fault current level with the resulting AIC rating of overcurrent devices at House panels HLA and HLB. Note: If you have any questions regarding this electrical plan review list please contact the plan reviewer listed above at (619) 560-1468. To speed the review process,. note on this -list. ( or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans. CARLSBAD 96-1914 OCT 21, 1996 VALUATION AND PLAN· CHECK FEE JURISDICTION; CARLSBAD PLAN CHECK NO.: 96-1914 PREPARED BY: Ali Sadre DATE: OCT 21, 1996 BUILDING ADDRESS: COLLEGE & FARADAY BLDG. ON LOT # 50 BUILDING OCCUPANCY: B/S2 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN/SPR BUILDING PORTION BUILDING AREA VALUATION VALUE (ft.2) MULTIPLIER ($) OFFICE 24,420 . 55 1,343,100 .WAREHOUSE . 125,739 22 2,766,258 .. " ... Air Conditioning F'i~e Sprinklers 150,159 1.7 255,270 TOiAL VALUE 3,491,702* ~ 1991 UBC Building Permit Fee D Bldg. Permit Fee by ordinance: $ 8,523.50 i?g 1991 UBC Plan Check Fee· D Plan Check Fee by ordinance: $ 5,540.28 Type of Review: ·~ Complete Review D Structural Only O, Repetitive Fee Applicable · D Other: Esgil Plan Review Fee: * COMMENTS: 80% VLAUATION FOR SHELL ONLY. D Hourly $ 4,432.22 Fire Services Review: D Complete Review D Other: D Suppression System D FireAlarm Esgil Fire Services Review Fee: $ Comments: Sheet 1 of 2 macvalue.doc 5196 •( CARLSBAD ·96-1914 OCT 21, 1996 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: CARLSBAD PLAN CHECK NO:: 96-1914 PREPARE.D BY: Ali Sadre DATE: OCT 21, 1996 BUILDING ADDRESS: COLLEGE & FARADAY BLDG. ON LOT # 51 BUILDING OCCUPANCY: B/S2 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN/SPR BUILDING PORTION BUILDING AREA VALUATION VALUE (ft.2) MULTIPLIER ($) OFFICE 14,244 55 783,420 WAREHOUSE 94,619 22 2,081,61-8 Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers 108,863 1.7 185,067 TOTAL VALUE 2,440,084* [g] 1991 UBC Building· Permit Fee D Bldg. Permit Fee by ordinance: $ 6,421.50 [g] 1991 UBC Plan Check Fee . D Plan Check Fee by ordinance: $ 4, 173.98 Type of Review: [g] Complete Review D Structural Only D Hourly D Repetitive Fee Applicable D Other: Esgil Plan Review Fee: $ 3,339.18 Comments: 80% VALUATION FOR SHELL ONLY* Fire Services Review: D Complete Review D Ot~er: D Suppression System D FireAlarm Esgil Fire Services Review Fee: $ Comments: Sheet 2 of 2 macvalue.doc 5196 •< . _.,,..,, - City of Carlsbad . ca-,;,,, ,o. o 14!1 -zoo@,.,.,, ,t@ o, January 20, 1997 RICHARD MARSH WARE -MALCOMB ARCHITECTS. 6690 LUSK BLVD SAN DIEGO CA 92121 Subject: BLJilding Plan Check 96-1914; Appeal of UBC Section 505 Requirements For Lot 51, 2090 Rutherford Rd Dear Mr. Marsh, The City has considerec;:f your appeal and has approved the use of a non- building easement in lieu of the literal requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code. The Assistant City Attorney has also suggested language changes. in the deed restriction as rioted in the enclosed memorandum. Please make these changes where necessary and r~cord the deed restricti.on on the title of the burdened property. Please also provide the City a copy of the recorded document prior to permit issuance for inclusion with the permit records. ihis allowance does not establish a precedent within the City of Carlsbad, nor is this allowance ·transferable to other parcels or projects within the City of Carlsbad. It does not set forth a policy or a practice wt)ich becomes the rule; rather, this is a one-time only exception to the general setback requirements for buildings of unlimited area. Pat Kelley Principal Building Inspector · attachment c: , , ,-:··1e,:::,. .~-' ",,. ' . Assistant City Attorney Fire Marshal Kurt Culver, EsGil Corporation 2075 Las Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 • (619) 438-1161 • FAX (619) 438-0894 .·.· ·.,· , ,•.:, ,., . .,.·to', '• :·~ ; recorded and entered in the files of the code enforcement agency." Accordingly, if you find that special individual reasons make · imposition of the 60-foot yard within the same lot requirement impractical, and that the modification: is otherwise in conformance with the intent and purpose of the code and does not lessen any fire-protection requirements or any degree ·of structural integrity, and note those details in the file, you may grant the permit on the condition that the proposed agreement be executed and recorded. If facts known or to be made known to you justify approval of the permit application on the condition that the agreement be executed and recorded, we sugges~ the following changes: 1. Pleas~ change Recital Din two respects: change reference to UBC section 505 to refer instead to section 505.2; second, after the reference to "not less than (60) feet in width," insert "on the same property (lot)". 2. Change paragraph 5, Enforcement, by adding after reference·to the "restrictions contained herein" the following phrase: ", 'including but not limited to, denial of building permits on the Burdened Property which would be inconsistent with said restrictions."; and delete th~ next.sentence providing for attorneys fees. ' ·If you need fu~ther assistance regarding this matter, ,do not hesitate to contact the undersigned • • ·se~~~ o.· RICHARD RUD F Assistant City rney afs c: City Attorney 2 " ;,_·. , 1 • ..;.A.RLSBAD 96-1914 ' 'DEC 4, 1996 1. Please make all corrections on ·the original tracings and submit three ·sets of revised prints, to the City of Carlsbad. 2. Note the typ~ of occupancy is S-1 instead of S-2 for lot 5.1 under building analysis, sheet A-0. 4. Justify unlimited area (60'-yards on· all sides) for building# 2 with 1 0' side yard. 11. Provide a letter from the soils engineE?r confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soil report are properly incorporated into 1the plans. · 14. Note on plans the architect or engineer .of record shall prepare a special inspection program with the stages of construction and the firms responsible for the special inspection, Which shafl be Sl:Jbmitted to the building official for approval prior to issuance of the building permit. Please review Section 106.3.5. This is not the same as tne spacial inspection list. 23. Detail 4/AS.1 as referenced on 4/A-3.1 is incorrect. 30. C.ootdinate all the entry details on A-4.2, A6.0 and A6.1 and reference them correctly on plans. As shown several details have identical reference #'s or are referenced incorrectly (or are not referenced) on floor plans. 35. Column locations on A'J..1 by A-1 & 8-1 do not match the structural plans. ~ 44. Specify tie down detaii 1/S0-2 is typical, on S-2. 57, On S-5, bldg. 1 mezzanine plan, show details for the corner column supported at the mezzanine. Also show rigid ma,ment connections for the cantilevered beams near !Jrid point L-1. 60. On S-5, mezzanine plan of building 2, the brace mid-column near grid line B, should line-up with line 1.5, per foundation plans. The pad was relocated to the mid point, but not .the column. '95. Ple.ase note where detail 15/SD .. 2 is referenced on plans. This detail was not deleted per response list. 106. On 19/SD-2, delete the note regarding the bond breaking detail for eve,y third ~. Expansion & contraction of the rebar is more critical than the panels. This ~etail should apply t~ all panel joints where ever there is rebar welding. 1~ ", I t '- (_; . . . ·{ . ~ARLSBAD 95-1914 DEC 4, 1996 110. Note the size of the stabilizing plate on detail 15/SD-3 or reference to another detail for this information. Similarly, for detail 18/SO·3. Where is the size of the plate added, per response list ? 123. Show how·you comply with the SAC interim guidelines. Detail 2/SD-5 still does not meet the SAC recommendations for OMF's. These guidelines recommend the use of additional (reinforcing) plates on top and bottom beam flanges to move the plastic hinge location from the face of the column and reduce the ~nreliability associated with the column flange through-thickness properties. j 127. See Section 1921.4.4 for the spacing of the ties in detail 10/SD-5 (i.e.1 4" & 6", resp~ctively) versus 6" & 12" as shown. Alternatively, show that they are not a part of the lateral force resisting system, so they should be designed for Section 1921.7.2.2. 130. On detail 3/SD-6, the 3/16" weld is pointed to the wrong location (it points to the area betvveen the 4x beam and the U-plate). 132. Show the weld size and type on detail 6/SD-6 between the top chords and the 1" plate. Please do not resubmit the plans .without these items. Call the reviewer fQrQue$tions. • to speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number. calculation page, etc. + The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 619/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Ali Sadre at Esgil Corporation. · Thank yo~. ' (' KLT CONSULTING STRUCIURAL ENGINEERS 3430 Irvine Avenue, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Tel: (714) 263-1308 Fax: (714) 263-1310 ,1 PROJECT CA g!G 9 A:.:D R.r_.fi,,-t;A Red (:lf.J:-,2;k.1;r)ATE 1; · c;. -rt:. sHEETycz-;;( __ SUBJECT TL..AJ (hl/6C-/4 C2P..~&;:;,1{;) ,J '> -2. CALC.BV ___ JOB 90 ° qa- j;J_/10 ) -- ,r -@--ry p. I? C 4 (. t I!: :) CJ V 1 .? /Y ? c::,-,,,,j t/-1,:.e. 1 > >--z. ~-Z; A,{/[) ?a. Y"-f A ,l S W @ ~ @ A-K~ A 9 v c;p ,4 Vo CA-<i .. .,, ovr oJ 'j?~AAI >i-f-~6T c;-r. :J) 1 M ~ ti ~ l e,;, _A.I :> /~ T J-1-2 c. c. ~ 1 1 ° Jo f /H £ 3 ~ kc:s f (;.. A Mt, .NG I-) R ~,/ 1J~ @ , J .d7 U u: ... P I IY C7 -2.. AR tS AP.P£ D oAl pLAAI ~'~~rs. ~-cf-3 ~-.r. ~~~~ 6. V~ R ( T ;I l/?. D -®- w c p v r r J-/ 6 %. A 1-1 o J 1 o 1 of C-c;,1.. vu .,J ~ _ ~ -r HA T If" JC?/ if/" f A, ls I r 1n ~ ~A q ~ 1 ,Al > ,4AJ _J:> 'VY 1t...l IJ07 '5 C., f V O >1/,J_ ;V( o-< c I /Jf P ft.. MA, JI .;i A/> AiZE A.J)J)E::) /0 1'6{A 1l.-@-. . KLT CONSULTING STRUCIURAL ENGINEERS 3430 lrvine Avenue, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Tel: (714} 263-1308 F~: (714) 263-1310 -, / .:::? / oc 2-, y-- PROJECT ______ -'---.....:......------------,--DATE /.:,.. 'I..::>. I b SHEET_/_ '_oF __ _ SUBJECT _----'----------'---------CALC. ev ___ JQB r CO r 4 rl/4-~IJC. c..,.;~e,ui.Af{ pie:-,, I~ ,,UoT A C:AfeP-Al ~;zce. Rct;1 yt 11-IG; >_y 06d. r4:3~G.p F-..c. 7/h ;-,~ p Ro Vt yE.P t ~ .;;>. ~ '°' 11 I 'I 0 X I CP =-3 \ "2. )( )f I 4 ;:: (j_' I I/ II X Xpt.? ~ 15 ;:;-;·z. t/ ,.,_ ,. City of Carlsbad M#i ,, .•• , t44 a •• , .• ·24 -s,a ,,,tA, ,. BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST DATE: /(J --o),4-9b BUILDING ADDRESS: PROJECT _DESCRIPTION: ASSESSOR'S PARQEL NUMBER: d-/d.... ... /,gQ-',::z, ,5 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL DENIAL The item· you_ have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based ~,n plans, information and/or specifications provided in. your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to build. D A Right-of-Way permit is required prior to construction of the following improvements: · ATTACHMENTS D Dedication Application D · Dedication Checklist D Improvement Application D Improvement Checklist D Future Improvement Agreement D Grading Permit Application D Grading Submittal Checklist D Rjght-of-Way Permit Application D Right-of-Way Permit Submittal Checklist ·and Information Sheet D $ewer Fee Information Sheet Please see~h attached report of deficiencies marked witti Make necessary corrections to plans or specifi ation for compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. st:(a m~ Date:. /~f,/9?, By/lJ,/()~ Date: j/r /97 By: Date: ---------- ENGINEERING DEPT. CONTACT PERSON Name: Michele Masterson City of Carlsbad Address: 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 Phone: (619)438-1161, ext. 4315 A-4 )11.ASPALMASISYS\LIBIWIYIENG\WORDIDOCSICHKLSl\Bulclng ~ Cldll_BP0001 Form MM.-Rw. 11121/IMI 2075 Las Palmas Dr.~ Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 • (619) 438-1161 • FAX (619) 438-0894 ~ , IJ,, ur BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST '.\" -~~ f o~~.iJ ~ ~. ~ , -r SITE PLAN ~ ~ .J!A/2 v--, c.. h..-LA ~ 2Nt/-~RD.r 1 _ . 1/CWJ <,/~~~-I: 7'-.J V _ ._. Provide a fully dimensioned ';ir"p~~ drawn to scale. Show:~ ~a,J,,Jt'fv~ Cl A. North Arre~ D. B Existing & Proposed Structures 7E. *'(yxisting Street Improvements v F. 2. Show on site plan: A. Drainage Patterns B. Existing & Proposed Slopes C. Existing Topography Property Lines Easements~ Easements ~ Right-of-Way Width ~ Adjacent Streets - 3. Include note: "Surface water to be directed away from the building foundation at a 2% gradient for no less than 5' or 2/3 the distance to the property line (whichever is less)." [Per 1985 UBC 2907(d)5] On graded sites, the top of any exterior foundation shall extend above the elevation of the street gutter at point of discharge or the inlet of an approved -drainage device a minimum of 12 inches plus two percent." [Per 1990 UBC 2907(d)5] 4. Include on .title sheet: A. Site address B. Assessor's Parcel Number C. Legal Description For commercial/industrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, include: total building square footage with the square footage for each different use, existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing, warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved. EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION Page 1 of 4 G:ILIBRARYIENGIWORDIOOCS\CHKLS'T\&iking Plllncheck Ctclsl 8P0001 Fann 11M doc Rev, 8121/ll!I ,,i' ? .._ .., . !· .. ... ~ ., a -a a a CJ BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE 5. project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of approval for Project No._.---------------------- Conditions were complied with by: ________ _ Date: ---- DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS 6. Dedication for all street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the building site and any storm drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and for remodels with a value at or exceeding $ _____ _ .pursuant to Code Section 18.40.030. Dedication required as follows: ________________ _ Dedication requireq. Please hav~ a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description together with . an 8 ½" x 11" plat map and submit with a title report. All easement documents must be approved and signed by owner(s) prior to·issuance of Building Permit. Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process. Provide the completed application form and the requirements on the checklist at the time of resubmittal. Dedication completed by: ___________ _ Date: ___ _ IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS 7a. All needed public improyements upon and adjacent to the building site must be constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the construction exceeds$ ·, pursuant to Code Section 18.40.040. Public improvements required as follows: _____________ _ Please have a registered Civil Engineer prepare appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements on the attached checklist for a separate plancheck process through the Engineering Department. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of permit. Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public improvement requirements. Provide the completed application form and the requirements on the checklist at the time of resubmittal. Improvement Plans signed by: _________ _ Date: ---- Page 2 of 4 G:ILIBRARYIENGIWOROIOOCS\CHKLS'T\Building Plancheck Cldst BP0001 Fonn MM.doc Rev. 81211111! ~ . r. ~~ -• ..1 . " 3 • ,. . ..,. .. .. 1st,., 2"(1/ 3rcl.r Q 0 0 o. 0 0 0 0 · 0 Q 0 0 0 0 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 7b. Construction of the public "improvements may be deferred pursuant to Code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title report or current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $ _______ so we may prepare the necessary Future Improvement Agreement. This agreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building permit. Future public improvements required as follows: Improvement Plans signed by: Date: ---------- 7c. Enclosed please find your Future Improvement Agreement. Please return agreement signed and notarized to the Engineering Department. i=titure Improvement Agreement completed by: · Date: 7d. No Public .Improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or defective improvements found adjacent to building site must be· repaired to the satisfaction of the City Inspector prior to occupancy. · · GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section 11.06.030 of the Municipal Code. Ba. adequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading requirements. Include accurate grading quantities (cut, fill import, export). 8b. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer must be submitted together with the completed application form attached. NOTE: The Grading Permit must be issued and rough grading approval obtained prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Q,v~ . .3 50-,3A-- Grading Inspector sign off by: __________ Date: Sc. No Grading Permit required. Page 3 of 4 G:ILIBRARYIENG\WOROIDOCS\CHKI.Sl\lluilclng PII-Cldtl BP0001 Fonn Ml.I.doc Rev. 8121/PO .. ~, . ~ ~.,:~~--: . . ' a a rtl/ a a a a BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS 9. A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-Way and/or private work adjacent to the public Right-of-Way. Types of work include, but are not lirnited to: street improvements, trees, driveways, tieing into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities. Right-of-Way permit required for: ,i k4-<t.ltia.1;f=-~. A separate Right-of-Way permit issued by the Engineering Department is required for the following: 10. A SEWER PERMIT is required concurrent with the building permit issuance. The fee is noted ·in the fees section on the following page. 11. INDUSTRIALWASTE PERMIT is required. Applicant must complete Industrial Waste Permit Application Form and submit for City approval prior to issuance of a Permit. Industrial 'JVaste permit accepted by: Date: 12. NPDES PERMIT Complies with · the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant shall provide best management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever o_ccurs first. Ot.,t)C; 3 50 ..... 3 If-_ Page4 of4 · G:\LIBRARYIENGI\NORD\DOCS\CHKLsne.Mng -Cldol BP0001 Form MM.doc Rev. 8121/lle • ... · j:NGINEERING DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING REVIEW SECTION FE·E CALCULATION WORKSHEET D Estimate based on unconfirmed information from applicant. 1 D Calculation based on building plancheck plan submittal. Address: 6J09o ~r,e CXdi.lg. Pennlt No. C <LJ q_(c; d D0-5 Prepared by: m,A /)1.._ Date: /~y1.f,Checked by: . Date: ______ _ EDU CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses. · _!Sj 060 Types of Use~ Sq. Ft./1:1ntts:--/Df?;R6~ ' EDU's:. _____ o{-"-'/'--6_1 ___ 7'---_ Total EDU's: _______ o1 _______ /_• ..... 7_7..___ ADT CALCULATIONS: List ~ypes and square footages for all uses. ~coo Types of Useu/4.d. Sq. Ft./l:Jn'rt.r.-/{iJo4p{ ADT's: __ ....a5 ___ 4-..____4-__ _ Total ADT's_--=5___._4--_4-.__ __ FEES REQUIRED: PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE REQUIRED D YES D NO (See Building Department for amount) WITHIN CFO: ~ES (no bridge & thoroughfare fee, D NO reduced Traffic Impact Fee) ,i;i ~K-IN-LIEU FEE PARK AREA: __ _ FEE/UNIT: · X NO. UNITS:.___ =$ 0 ~AFFIC IMPACT FEE AD T's/UNITS:. 5 4-4: X FEE/ADT: . ~ .;l_ Iµ ~IDGE AND THOROUGHFARE FEE AD T's/UNITS: ___ _ X FEE/ADT: ___ _ ~FACILITIES MANAGEMENT FEE ZONE: 0 ----~ SQ.FT.: /Q8, 1 803 UY°5. SEWER FEE X FEE/SQ.FT.: PE~MIT No.5£ 2b (:)/3 / X FEE/EDU: Jg /Q EDU's: ;) /0 17 BENEFIT AREA: . F . DRAINAGE BASIN:. s2 8 EDU's: a/. 1/t X FE;E/EDU: ~ 1 °} ~AINAGE FEES PLDA __ ____ HIGH ___ /LOW __ _ ACRES:_____ X FEE/AC: __ _ ilJl~~R LATERAL ($2,500 DEPOSIT) ~WATER FEE EDU's: __ __,..._ X FEE/EDU: __ _ =$ lh ttoJ =$ 0 =$ f3,54-5 =$ 3CJ, 404-• =$ /1' 136 =$ --c9 =$ -0- =$~' TOTAL OF ABOVE FEES*: $ / / '6 053 *NOTE: This calculation sheet Is NOT a complete 11st of all fees which may be c:lue. Dedicatic:,ns and Improvements may also be required with Building Permits. P:\DOCS\MISFORMS\BP0002.FRM REV 01/04/95 I CllY OF CARLSBAD GRADING INSPECTION-CHECKLIST FOR PARTIAL SITE RELEASE PROJECT INSPECTOR: )N)LllB/\11 L.£J0f3-2- PROJECT ID ea. :967 DATE: /0-/,-o/1-z GRADING PERMIT NO. ___ _ LOTS REQUESTED FOR RELEASE: ...... ____ ....,L='/J~T..,......... £~"/ ___________ _ N/A: = NOT APPUCABLE J = COMPLETE O = Incomplete or unacceptable 1st 2nd. · 1. Site access to requested lots adequate and logically grouped t------¥-----1 2. Site erosion control measures adequate. t------...+-----t 3. Overall site adequate for health, safety and welfare of public: t---~----t 4. Letter of request for partial release submitted 1---,,-,--~----t 5. 8-1/l x 11 " site plan· showing requested lots submitted. ------. 6. Compaction report from soils engineer submitted. ------ ------ 7. Engineer-of work certification of work done and pad elevations. 8. Geologic engineer's letter if unusual geologic or subsurface conditions exist. 9. Project conditions of approval checked for conflicts 10. Can water service be installed prior to bringing building combustibles on site. ~ Partial release of grading fQrthe above stated lots is approved for the purpose of building permit issuance. Issuance of bt,iilding permits is still subject to all normal City requirements required pursuant to the building permit process. o· Partial release of the site is denied for the following reasons: ~-/t--f2 Date · · Project Engineer ~. Date H:\Lll3RARY\ENG\WPDA TA \INSPECT\FORMS\PARTSI1E .FRM PLANNING DEPARTMENT BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST '16-to-S>' Plan Check No. CB -96• µ71(/-o ~r;_ • Address Zo 9 I /a.-t 7ff tJ2.Ja/Lt> Planner Van Lynch Phone (619) 438-1161, extension APN: 2 \2-C"20-Z-J"" t:.,oT S-f 4325 . Type of Project and Use: /~Du~ 7MIIL Project Density:_-.L../21/'-"-4-11-'L ____ _ Zoning: C-Y'V\ General Plan: (> J;:' Facilities Management Zone: _S-__ _ CFD~nutl # J... Date of participation: v-7..Jlf f Remaining net dev acres: o lg;,61e One (For non-residential development: Type of land used created by this permit: //.l()t1_r; ~ c.c,.r,,,,""'dU'/lt'-'"/Jus1,i1~5 Pl,J/lL ) Legend: ~ Item Complete · Q Item Incomplete -Needs your action Environmental ~eview Required: YES __ . NO K,_ TYPE __ _ DATE OF COMPLETION: _____ _ Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: ~ D D Discretionary Action Required: YES _._ NO ~ TYPE ___ _ APPROVAL/RESO. NO. _____ DATE ___ _ PROJECT NO. _________ _ ' QTHER RELATED CASES: ...... \ ____________________ _ Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state condi!ions which require action. Conditions of Approval: ("2 -rO-U h · D D Coastal Zon~ Assessment/Compliance Project site located in Coastal Zone? YES NOJ2(_ CA Coastal Commiss.ion Authority? YES NO if California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact them at -3111 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 200, San Diego CA 92108-1725; (619) 521-8036 Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt): Coastal Permit Determination Form already completed? YES NO If NO, complete Coastal Permit Determination Form now. Coastal Permit Determination Log #: Follow-Up Actions: 1) Stamp Building Plans as "Exempt" or "Coastal Permit Required" (at minimum Floor Plans). 2) Complete· Co·astal Permit Determination Log as needed. ~DD lnclusionary Housing Fee required: YES NO K._ (Effective date of lnclusionary Housing Ordinance -May 21, 1993.) Data Entry Completed? YES _ NO (Enter CB'#; UACT; N'EXT12; Construct housing Y/N; Enter Fee Amount (See fee schedule for amount); Return) Site Plan: ~ D· D 1.. Provide a fully dimensional site plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way width, dimensional setbacks and existing,_ topographical lines. ~ D D 2. Provide legal description of property and assessor's parcel number. Zoning: 0 D D 1 . Setbacks: Front: Required 3c::f Shown Bo~u Interior Side: Required to Shown to' -1-6 7' Street Side: Required z.o Shown l.f6 -Rear:,,. Required Shown ~D D 2. Accessory structure setbacks: Front: Required Shown Interior Side: Required Shown Street Side: Required Shown Rear: Required Shown Structure separation: Required. Shown ~ D D 3. Lot Coverage: Required ~'SD '.l; 6 IWSI Shown l(2, 7%' ~D D· ~'Jc> • 26 r 4. Height: Required Shown -~D D 5. Parking: Spaces Required Z-c:>O Shown 2 "'2..0 Guest Spaces Required Shown D DD. Additional Comments OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER i). ~ P!f. ,. ', - City of Carlsbad 96297 Fire Department • Bureau of Prevention General Comments: Date of Report: Thursday, October 24, 1996 . Contact Name Richard Marsch Address 6640 Lusk B.1 Suite 205C City, State San. Diego CA 92121 Bldg. Dept. No. 96-2035 Planning No. _____ _ Job Name Lot 51 ---------~-------J...o10 Job Address _aoao Rutherford Ste. or Bldg. No. ____ _ Disqpproved by M. Aguilera. Submit three sets of corrected plans to the building department for routing to the appropriate. department. 2560 Orion Way • Carlsbad, California 92008 • (619) 931-2121 !If'",-. . .. City of. Carlsbad 96297 Fire Department • Bureau of Prevention Plan Review: Requirements Category: Building Plan Check Date of Report: Thursday, October 24, 19~6 Contact Name Richard Marsch /11~ Reviewed by:_____,---..,,.,.-------,---r t/f)l{ · ag~ Address 6640 Lusk Bl Suite 20qC City, State San Diego CA 921~1 Bldg. Dept. No. 96-2035 Planning No. Job Name Lot 51 ----------~~----- Job Address 2080 Rutherford Ste. or Bldg. No. ____ _ D Approved -The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans; information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifica- tions, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. ~ Disapproved -Please see the attached report of deficiencies. Please make corrections to plans or specifications necessary to indicate compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. For Fire Department Use Only Review 1st ·---2nd __ _ 3rd_--,-_ Other Agency ID CFO Job# __ 96_2_9_7 __ File# ___ ~ 2560 Orion Way • Carlsbad, California 92008 • (619) 931-2121 City of Carlsbad _ _ 96297 . Fire Department · • Bureau of Prevention Plan Review: Requirements -Category: Building Plan Check Date of Report: Wednesday, December 11, 1996 Reviewed by: f"'l, ~ ~ Contact Name Address City, State Richard Marsch 6640 Lusk Bl Suite 205C . - San Diego CA 92121 Bldg. Dept. No. _9 6 __ -_2_0_3 5 ___ _ Planning No. Job Name Lot 51 -~---------~-~--- Job Address 2090 Rutherford Ste. or Bldg. No. ____ _ ~ Approved -The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans; information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifica- tions, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please .review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. D Disapproved -Please see the attached report of deficiencies. Please make corrections to plans or specifications necessary to indicate compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. For Fire Department Use Only Review 1st. __ _ 2nd_. __ 3rd __ _ Other Agency ID CFD Job# 96297 File#_~-- 2560 Orion Way • Carlsbad, California 92008 • (619) 931-2121 City of Carlsbad ·Fire Department General Comments: Dat.e of Report: Wednesday, December 11, 1996 Contact Name Address City, State Richard Marsch 6640 Lusk Bl Suite 205C San Diego CA 92121 96297 • Bureau of Prevention Bldg. Dept. No. _9_6-_2_03_5 ___ _ Planning No. _____ _ Job Name Lot 51 ~---------------- Job Address 2090 Rutherford Ste. or Bldg. No. ____ _ Water improvement plans not submitted. 2560 Orion Way • · Carlsbad, California 92008 • (619) 931-2121 :--~1, City of Carlsbad . . . 96297 Fire Department • Bureau of Prevention Plan Review: Requirements Category: Building Plan Check Date of Report: Fridi:ly, December 20, 1996 Reviewed by: M. ~ ~ Contact Name Richard Marsch Address 6640 Lusk Bl Suite 205C City, State San Diego CA 92121 Bldg. Dept. No. 96-2035 Planning No. Job Name ~ot 51 -------~-~---~---- Job Address 2090 Rutherford Ste. or Bldg. No. ____ _ ~ Approved -The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans; information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after fhis date, including field modifica- tions, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. D Disapproved -Please see the attached report of deficiencies. Please make corrections to plans or specifications necessary to indicate compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. For Fire Department Use Only Review 1st. __ _ 2nd. __ _ 3rd __ _ Other Agency ID CFD Job# __ 96_2_9_7 __ File# ___ _ 2560 Orion Way • Carlsbad, California 92008 • (619} 931-2121 . I \I.,: -j City of Ca-rlsbad Fire Depar:-tment General Comments: Date of Report: Friday, December 20, 1996 Contact Name Address City, State Richard Marsch 6640 Lusk Bl Suite 205C San Diego CA 92121 96297 • Bureau of Prevention Bldg. Dept. No. _9_6_-2_03_5 ___ _ Planning No. _____ _ Job Name _L_o_t _51 ________ ---'--~~---- Job Address -2090 Rutherford Ste. or Bldg. No. ____ _ Water improvement plans not submitted. 2560 Orion Way • Carlsbad, California 92008 • (619} 931-2121 'I I I I I I I I I I I. I I I ~eotechnics Incorporated --- July 12, 1996 Koll Real Estate Group 7330 Engineer Road San Diego, California 92111-1464 Attention: Mr. Charlie Abdi SUBJECT: Dear Mr. Abdi: REPORT OF GEOTECHNl~CESilGATION Carlsbad Research Center, ot 51 NW Corner of Rutherford Roa and Aston Avenue Carlsbad, California Principals: Anthony F. Belfast Michael P. lmbriglio W. Lee Vanderhurst Project No. 0308-001-00 Doc. # 6-0344 The following report presents the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of our geotechnical investigation of the subject site. It is our understanding that the development is to consist of the construction of a one to two story, tilt-up concrete office_ building with adjacent paved parking. The subject site has been previously graded and is presently vacant. In general, our findings indi~ate that the subject site is underlain by Point Loma Formation and fill materials that are considered suitable to support the proposed structure, providing that the recommended site preparation is performed. There were no unusual or special conditions apparent in our investigation which would preclude the construction as planned. 1.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF WORK The purpose of our investigation was to evaluate the existing geotechnical conditions at the site as they relate to the propos(;!d improvements, and to make recommendations regarding site preparation and grading, design of the proposed foundations, retaining walls, floor slabs, and asphalt concrete pavements. The recommendations contained herein are based on a surface reconnaissance, subsurface exploration, laboratory· testing, and professional experience in the general site area. Design values may include presumptive parameters based on professional judgement. 9951 Business Park Ave., Ste. B • San Diego California • 92131 Phone (619) 53~6,~1171 Pl I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I· I I I Koll Real Estate Group July 12, 1996 Project No. 0308-001-00 Doc. #6-0344 Page 2 Our scope of work was limited to: 2.0 1.1 Review of available literature related to general geologic conditions. 1.2 A visual reconnaissance and subsurface exploration of the site consisting of the drilling of 5 borings with a truck mounted 8-inch diameter hollow stem flight auger. Bulk, disturbed and undisturbed samples were collected for laboratory testing. 1.3 Laboratory testing of selected samples collected during the subsurface exploration. Testing was intended to assist in characterizing soil properties and assessing pertinent engineering properties. 1.4 Assessment of general seismic conditions and geologic hazards affecting the area, and their likely impact on the project. 1.5 Development of recommendations for site preparation, earthwork construction, foundation design, on-grade slabs, and earth retaining structures, and pavements. 1.6 Preparation of this report. SITE DESCRIPTION The site consists of a roughly rectangular lot, which covers approximately 5 acres. The site is located west of the intersection of Rutherford Road and Aston Avenue as part of Unit 5 of the Carlsbad Research Center in Carlsbad, California as shown on the Site Location Map, Figure 1. Based on the referenced "As-Grade Geotechnical Report" dated April 1, 1988 by San Diego Geotechnical Consultants Inc., elevations of the existing building pad are between approximately 268 and 262 feet above sea level. The site is bordered on the north by Lot 51 and the west by two commercial lots. The east edge of the lot is bordered by Rutherford Road and the south edge of the lot is bordered by Aston Avenue. The southwest edge of the lot has a 2:1 slope that ascends approximately 2 feet to the adjacent hot 51. The southwestern edge of the lot has a 2: 1 slope that ascends 4 feet from pad level to Lot 51 to the west. Drainage is directed by sheet flow Geotechnics IncoipOrated I ' I I I I I I I I \ ' .... I -~--~09 ,,,/-\ I ~ \ \'8. \ \~ \ \«' \ \ ' ..... \ k).•i:~: \ I ~--~----. \ \-g \ ) \ I \ I I I I I CORTE E~:7 o"" I 0 / / COSMOS CT \ / ' ,,.,/ \ , \/ \\ \\ \ i --..... • , I I I I 1. __ ...... --- CARLSB D \ \ \ l..--------,------,-----1 n I I Geotechnics Incorporated SITE LOCATION MAP KOLL REAL ESTATE GROUP CRC LOT 51 PROJECT NO. 0308-001-00 DOCUMENT NO. 6-0344 FIGURE 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Koll Real Estate Group July 12, 1996 Project No. 0308-001-00 Doc. #6-0344 Page 3 to northeast and southwest along the hingeline. The hingeline bisects the pad from the southeast corner to the northwest corner of the lot. The property is currently vacant, with vegetation consisting of scattered light weeds which have been recently overturned with the top 6 inches of soil. Along the perimeter of the lot adjacent to the streets are soil berms approximately 2 feet high which are covered with grass and newly planted trees. The approximate layout of the site is shown in the Geotechnical Map, Figure 2. 3.0 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT We understand that the proposed construction will include a one to two-story office building with adjacent paved parking. Construction will consist of tilt-up concrete construction. Structural loads were hot provided during the preparation of this report. The proposed site layout for Lot 51 is shown on the Geotechnical Map, Figure 2. It is our understanding that proposed building pad elevations will not vary from existing grades by more than 2 feet. 4.0 GEOLOGY AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS The Carlsbad Research Center is located within the coastal plain section of the Peninsular Range Geomorphic Province of California. Our subsurface investigation indicates that the subject site is underlain by Cretaceous age Point Loma Formation. The As-Grade Geotechnical Report by San Diego Geotechnical Consultants dated April, 1988 indicates that Lot 51 was graded during Phases 3 and 4 in 1988. Based on the referenced report by San Diego Geotechnical Consultants Inc., grading during Phase 3 and 4 involved cutting up to about 8 feet from the easterly portion of the lot, and placing about 10 to 16 feet of fill in the southwestern portion of the lot. The transition line from cut to fill bisects the entire lot from north to south. The approximate locations of the borings made for our investigation are shown on the Geotechnical Map, Figure 2. Logs of the explorations are given in Appendix B. 4.1 Point Loma Formation The Point Loma Formation was encountered in all five borings to the maximum explored depth of approximately 25 112 feet below existing grade. Point Loma Formation observed iii our borings generally consisted of sandy claystone. The predominant sedimentary Geotechnics Incorporated ---~~-} -Z 31:lnDl:I vv£o-g ·oN 1N3Wnooa O0-~oo-BO£O 'ON l03rOHd I )o I .. .. - ',: /,, ,, 1§ i . ,-J -,.- • I :- ~ e -- ~g 107 OHO . dnOH0 ;ll'v'lS31'v'3H 110)i d'IW 1'1:JINH:>3l03D ----..--- z 0 i= <( z <( _J a. >< w ...J ....I u: ..J ..J iI: PJl'lUOdJOJU~ SJ!Ul{JJl0gO J Cl C: ·c 0 .c ~ 0 ...... e 0 0.. X Q) .... C: 0 0 C: :;::; 0 ro :;::; E ro ,._ (..) 0 ..Q lL Q) (ti ...... (ti E E 0 ·x ...J ...... 0 ,._ C: 0. ·o 0. a. <( -~ C. ll) I ~ m C: 0 :2 (/) C: e ...... il= ~ ::, (..) .... 0 C: 0 :;::; ro (..) ..Q Q) ...... (ti E ·x 0 ,_ 0. 0. <( 1--w w LL II :c 0 z Li.i _J (5 en :I -~1 u iE ------------------- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Koll Real Estate Group July 12, 1996 Project No. 0308-001-00 Doc. #6-0344 Page 4 deposit observed in all of the borings was a <;:lark olive green claystone (CL) that is moist, non-plastic, and moderately cemented (ASTM D2487). 4.2 Fill Fill overlying the Point Loma Formation was encountered during our subsurface exploration in Borings 3, 4 and 5 to a maximum depth of approximately 16 112 feet. Our subsurface investigation indicates that fill exists in the western areas of the lot to a maximum depth of approximately 10 to 16 feet. The fill was reportedly derived from both the Point Loma Formation and other sources. Fill materials, as observed on site, typically consist of a sandy lean clay (CL), which is moist, and medium dense. This material has a medium plasticity, and laboratory testing indicates a medium to high potential for expansion. The fill was reportedly observed and tested by San Diego Geotechnical Consultants Inc. and their results are presented in the referenced report dated April 1, 1988. The results of their tests indicate the fill soils were compacted to at least 90% of ASTM D1557. 4.3 Groundwater No groundwater was observed in our borings. However, changes in rainfall or site drainage could produce seepage or locally perched groundwater conditions within the soil or bedrock underlying the site. It should be recognized that excessive irrigation on the project site could also cause perched groundwater ·conditions to develop at some future date. This typically occurs at underlying contacts with less permeable materials, such as the interface that exists between the fill and the underlying formational material. 5.0 GEOLOGIC HAZARDS AND SEISMICITY 5.1 Geologic Hazards The immediate subject site is not located within an area previously known for geologic hazards such as landslides, ground breaking due to surface motion, seiches or tsunamis Evidence of past soil failures or faulting were not observed during our investigation. Liquefaction of the underlying soils is not considered a hazard due to the lack of shallow Geotechnics Incoipomted I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Koll Real. Estate Group July 12, 1996 Project No. 0308-001-00 Doc. #6-0344 Page 5 groundwater and the relatively moderate cementation of the Point Loma Formation materials and the presence of compacted fill soils. 5.2 Seismicity and Faulting The subject site is located approximately 5 miles northeast of the projected offshore trace of the Rose Canyon fault zone. This fault zone is classified as active, and capable of generating a magnitude 6.5 earthquake (maximum probable event). The estimated peak site ground acceleration for such an event is 0.44g, as presented on Table 1. The estimated earthquake magnitudes and peak ground acceleration from other active faults which may affect the site are also presented on Table 1. Design of structures should comply with the requirements of the governing jurisdictions, building codes and standard practices of the Association of Structural Engineers of California. Ground-breaking due to active faulting is considered to have a low potential, due to the distance from known, active fault traces. 6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 6.1 General Discussion No geotechnical conditions were apparent during the investigation which would preclude construction of the proposed structures as planned. However, some geotechnical constraints exist which require special design consideration in order to decrease the likelihood of distress to the proposed structures. • The on-site soils include both compacted fill, and hard claystone bedrock. The proposed building layout places the structure over both bedrock and fill materials. Because of the different settlement characteristics of the two materials, we estimate that the potential exists for about ¾-inch of differential settlement between the transition line and the edge of the structure overlying the deepest fill (approximately ¾-inch in 170 feet). No significant settlement is expected over the cut area. Geotechnics IncolJ)Ornted ------------------- I MAXIMUM CREDIBLE EVENT MAXIMUM PROBABLE EVENT FAULT1 DISTANCE MOMENT PEAK HORIZ. MOMENT PEAK HORIZ. TO SITE MAGNITUDE3 ACCEL.4 MAGNITUDE2 ACCEL.4 (miles) Mo g Mo g Coronado Bank 21 7.7 0.29 7.1 0.21- Rose Canyon 5 7.0 0.49 6.5 0.44 San Clemente 58 7 .. 3 0.08 6.6 0.05 San Diego Trough 3t 7.7 0.21 6.1 0·.09 San Jacinto 47 7.0 0.09 6.8 0.18 Whittier-Elsinore 23 7.5 0.25 7.0 0.19 1. Faults from Wesnousky (1986), Jennings (1994) 2. Magnitudes modified from Wesnousky (1986) 3. Magnitudes modified from Mualchin and Jones (1992) 4. Peak horizontal accelerations from Mualchin and Jones (1992) ....... Geotechnics PREDICTED SEISMICITY PROJECT NO. 0308-001-00 KOLL REAL ESTATE GROUP DOCUMENT NO. 6-0344 Incorporated CRC LOT 51 TABLE 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Koll Real Estate Group Project No. 0308-001-00 July 12, 1996 Doc. #6-0344 • Page 6 o As a minimum we recommend that the building pad be over-excavated at least 3 feet to provide more uniform bearing conditions and to allow for treatment of expansive soil. o The project architect and structural engineer should review the estimated settlement. If the estimated differential settlement is not tolerable, we recommend that additional over-excavation of the bedrock portion of the pad be performed to decrease the settlement slope to tolerable levels. For example, excavation of a wedge of bedrock varying from 4 feet at the eastern building line, to a depth of 8 feet at the transition line should provide for a uniform settlement of ¾-inch across the building. The on-site fill soils and claystone are moderately to highly expansive. The use of the expansive soil under structures creates the risk of slab and foundation movement and cracking. Two options are typically considered to reduce the risk of distress when building on expansive soil: 1) Removal of a portion of the expansive soil and replacing them with non-expansive soil; and 2) Increasing the moisture content in the foundation soil to decrease its expansive potential, and using a deepened and reinforced slab and foundation. Although less expensive to construct, option #2 has a greater degree of risk associated with it, and the potential for cosmetic cracking of the slab and possibly drywall would need to be acceptable. The remainder of this report presents recommendations for grading, foundations, floor slabs, retaining walls, and pavements. These recommendations are based on empirical and analytical methods typical of the standard of practice in southern California. If these recommendations appear not to cover any specific feature of the project, please contact our office for additions or revisions to the recommendations. 6.2 Site Preparation 6.2.1 General: Clearing of the existing site should include the removal of any pipes, vegetation, or general debris. Any deleterious material, including construction debris, rocks over 6 inches in greatest dimension, or soil containing v~getation should not be used in site fills, and should be disposed of off-site. Geotechnics Jncoiporated I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Koll Real Estate Group July 12, 1996 Project No. 0308-001-00 Doc. #6-0344 Page 7 6.2.2 De-silting Basin: Temporary de-silting basins were installed during rough gtaqing of the subject site. Soft sediments have accumulated within the basin since initial construction. All soft sediments within the basin should be removed to a depth where competent fill or bedrock material is encountered. The entire excavation should then be brought up to finish surface grade with compacted fill as discussed in Section 6.4. In the event that the existing storm drain pipes within the debris basin are to be abandoned, they should be removed and their excavations backfilled with compacted fill in accordance with Section 6.4. 6.2.3 Building Areas: Site preparation recommendations in the building pad area are intended to mitigate two geotechnical constraints that exist at the site: a transition from bedrock to deep fill, and detrimentally expansive soil. 6.2.3.1 Bedrock to Fill Transition: As previously discussed, over- excavation of the bedrock portion of the building pad should be performed to provide more uniform bearing conditions. The amount of over- excavation will depend on the allowable differential settlement. As a minimum, the building area should be over-excavated at least 3 feet below proposed pad elevation. The maximum recommended over-excavation would consist of over-excavation the portion of the pad along the cut-fill transition to a depth of 8 feet, and decreasing the over-excavation depth to 3 feet along the west building line. In the building area, including at least five feet outside the structural perimeters, over-excavation of the all claystone bedrock should be removed to required depth below planned subgrade and stockpiled. The bottom of the excavation should then be scarified to a depth of 12 inches, brought to approximately optimum moisture conditions (based on ASTM D1557) and uniformiy compacted to at least 90 percent of maximum density (based on ASTM D1557). The stockpiled soil may then be replaced as a compacted fill in accordance with Section 6.4. The over- excavation envelope should be accurately staked prior to commencement of the excavation operations. The bottom of the excavation should be observed by the geotechnical consultant to confirm that conditions are as anticipated. These recommendations should be considered subject to revision based on field conditions observed by Geotechnics Incorporated. Geotechnics Incol])Orated I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Koll Real Estate Group Project No. 0308-001-00 July 12, 1996 Doc. #6-0344 Page 8 6.2.3.2 Expansive Soil Remediation: In the area of the planned building, including at least five feet outside of the building perimeters, surficial soil should be excavated to a minimum depth of 3 feet below slab subgrade, and replaced in accordance with one of the recommendations discussed below. In order to decrease differential heave due to the highly expansive nature of the on-site soil, the following alternatives are recommended. They are given 1n order of increasing risk of future differential heave and cracking. a. Replace the soil within the upper three feet of the building pad subgrade with non-expansive material. This should include the area within five feet of the building perimeter. This may consist of imported non-expansive soil, or lime-treated, on-site clay. Lime treatment generally requires from 3 to 6 percent hydrated lime uniformly mixed in the soil. The actual percentage required should be based on laboratory testing of the on-site clays. b. Remove .the soil within the upper three feet of building pad subgrade and replace it at a moisture content that is at least four percentage points above optimum moisture based on ASTM D1557. Because of the difficulty in compacting wet clays and the possible benefit of decreased expansion potential, the minimum compaction considered necessary is 87 percent of ASTM D1557 maximum density as determined during earthwork operations. As previously discussed additional risk of cosmetic slab and drywall cracks should be assumed with this option. 6.2.4 Asphalt Concrete Parking and Drives: The soil within the upper one foot of pavement subgrade should be scarified to a depth of at least 12 inches, moisture conditioned, and be compacted to at least 95 percent relative compaction based on ASTM D1557. Geotechnics Incoiporated I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Koll Real Estate Group July 12, 1996 6.3 Excavation and Grading Observation Project No. 0308-001-00 Doc. #6-0344 Page 9 Foundation excavations and site grading excavations should be observed by Geotechnics Incorporated. During grading, Geotechnics Incorporated should provide observation and testing services continuously. Such observations are considered essential to identify field conditions that differ from those anticipated by the preliminary investigation, to adjust designs to actual field conditions, and to determine that the grading is accomplished in general accordance with the recommendations of this report. Recommendations presented in this report are contingent upon Geotechnics Incorporated performing such services. Our personnel should perform sufficient testing of fill during grading to support our professional opinion as to compliance with compaction recommendations. 6.4 Fill Compaction All flll and backfill to be placed in association with site development should be accom- plished at slightly over optimum moisture conditions and using equipment that is capable of producing a uniformly compacted product. The minimum relative compaction recommended for fill is 90 percent of maximum density based on ASTM 01557. Sufficient ob~ervation and testing should be performed by Geotechnics Incorporated so that an opinion can be rendered as to the compaction achieved. Imported fill sources, if needed, should be observed prior to hauling onto the site to determine the suitability for use. Representative samples of imported materials and on- site soils should be tested by our firm in order to evaluate their appropriate engineering properties for the planned use. During grading operations, soil types other than those encountered in the borings may be encountered by the contractor. We should be notified to evaluate the suitability of these soils for use as fill and as finish grade soils. 6.5 Surface Drainage Foundation arid slab p~rformance depends greatly on how well the runoff waters drain from the site. This is true both during construction and over the entire life of the structure. The ground surface around structures should be graded so that water flows rapidly away from the structures without ponding. The surface gradient needed to achieve this depends Geotechnics Incorporated I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Koll Real Estate Group July 12, 1996 Project No. 0308-001-00 Doc. #6-0344 Page 10 on the prevailing landscape. In general, we recommend that pavement and lawn areas within five feet of buildings slope away at gradients of at least two percent. Densely Vegetated areas should have minimum gradients of at least five percent away from buildings in the first five feet. Densely vegetated areas are considered those in which the planting type and spacing is such that the flow of water is impeded. Planters should be built so that water from them will not seep into the foundation, slab, or pavement areas. This is especially important if the building areas are not capped with non-expansive soil. Roof drainage should be channeled by pipe to storm drains, or discharge at least 5 feet from building lines. Site irrigation should be limited to the minimum necessary to sustain landscaping plants. Should excessive irrigation, surface water intrusion, water line breaks, or unusually high rainfall occur, saturated zones or "perched" groundwater may develop in the underlying soils. 6.6 Foundation Recommendations These recommendations are considered generally consistent with methods typically used in southern California. Other alternatives may be available. The foundation recommendations herein should not be considered to preclude more restrictive criteria of governing agencies or by the structural engineer. The design of the foundation system should be performed by the project structural engineer, incorporating the geotechnical parameters described in the following sections. Geotechnics Incorporated I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .I I I I I Koll Real Estate Group July 12, 1996 Project No. 0308-001-00 Doc. #6-0344 Page 11 6.6.1 Foundations on Recompacted, On-Site Soil With Moisture Treatment Allowable Soil Bearing: Modulus of Subgrade Reaction: Minimum Footing Width: Minimum Footing Depth: 2,000 lbs/ft2 (allow a one-third increase for short- term wind or seismic loads) 150 kips/ft2 12 inches 24 inches below lowest adjacent soil grade Minimum Reinforcement: Two no.4 bars at both top and bottom in continuous footings. Lateral Resistance: Lateral loads against structures may be resisted by friction between the bottoms of footings or slabs and the supporting soil. A coefficient of friction of 0.2 is recommended. Alternatively, a passive pressure of 200 lbs/ft3 is recommended for the portion of vertical -foundation members embedded into compacted fill. If friction and passive pressure are combined, the passive pressure value should be reduced by one- third. 6.6.2 Foundations on Lime-Treated Subgrade or Non-Expansive Cap Allowable Soil Bearing: Modulus of Subgrade Reaction: Minimum Footing Width: Minimum Footing Depth: Minimum Reinforcement: 3,000 lbs/ft2 (allow a one-third increase for short- term wind or seismic loads) 250 kips/ft2 12 inches 18 inches below lowest adjacent soil grade Two no.4 bars at both top and bottom in continuous footings. Geotechnics Incorpornted I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Koll Real Estate Group July 12, 1996 Lateral Resistance: Project No. 0308-001-00 Doc. #6-0344 Page 12 Lateral loads against structures may be resisted by friction between the bottoms of footings or slabs and the supporting soil. A coefficient of friction of 0.3 is recommended. Alternatively, a passive pressure of 300 lbs/ft3 is recommended for the portion of vertical foundation members embedded into compacted fill. If friction and passive pressure are combined, the passive pressure value should be reduced by one- third. 6.6.3 Settlement: Compacted fills may experience hydrocompression settlement due to infiltration of rain or irrigation water into the fill. This, and the expected foundation loads, may result in a differential settlement of approximately 3/4-inch between the cut-fill transition and the edge of the building over the deepest fill (approximately ¾-inch in 170 feet). As previously discussed, this may be decreased to approximately ¾-inch across the structure is additional removal and recompaction of the bedrock is performed. This condition should be reviewed by the project structural engineer and architect. If this is found to be unacceptable, please contact Geotechnics Incorporated for additional recommendations. 6.7 On-Grade Slabs Building slabs should be supported by compacted fill prepared as recommended under Section 6.2. Slabs should be designed for the anticipated loading. If an elastic design is used, a modulus of subgrade reaction of 150 kips/ft3 should be suitable. As a minimum, slabs should be at least 5 to 6 inches in thickness and be reinforced with at least #3 bars on 18 inch centers, each way. 6.7.1 Moisture Protection for Slabs: Concrete slabs constructed on soil ultimately cause the moisture content to rise in the underlying soil. This results from continued ca~illary rise and the termination of normal evapotranspiration. Because normal concrete is permeable, the moisture will eventually penetrate the slab unless some protection is provided. To decrease the likelihood of problems related to damp slabs, suitable moisture protection measures should be used where moisture sensitive floor cc,'terings or other factors warrant. A commonly used moisture protection consists of about four inches of clean sand covered by 'visqueen' plastic sheeting. In addition, two inches of sand are placed over the plastic to decrease concrete curing problems associated with placing concrete Geotechnics Incorporated I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Koll Real Estate Group July 12, 1996 Project No. 0308-001-00 Doc. #6-0344 Page 13 directly on an impermeable membrane. However, it has been our experience that such systems will transmit from approximately 6 to 12 pounds of moisture per 1000 square feet per day. This may be excessive for some applications. If more protection is needed, we recommend that the slab be underlain by at least 6-inches of minus 3/4-inch crushed rock, with no plastic membrane. In addition, it is recommended that a lbw water-cement ratio (0.5 maximum) be used for concrete, and that the slab be moist-cured for at least five days in accordance with methods recommended by the American Concrete Institute. On-site quality control should be used to confirm the design conditions. 6. 7 .2 Exterior Slabs If exterior improvements such as slabs and sidewalks are constructed on the moderately expansive site soils, some movement and cracking should be expected. Reinforcement and control joints will reduce the amount of cracking and differential movement. As a minimal recommendation, slabs should be at least 5 inches thick and should be reinforced with at least #3 rebars on 24 inch centers, each way (or alternatively 6" x 6"-W2.9 x W2.9 WWF). Crack control joints should be placed on at least 10 foot centers, each way. Differential movement between buildings and exterior slabs, or between sidewalks and curbs may be decreased by dowelling the slab into the foundation or curb. 6.8 Expansive Soils The soils observed during our investigation consisted primarily of low plasticity clay (CL). Laboratory testing of soils on adjacent lots indicates the soils have a moderate to high expansion potential. 6.9 Reactive Soils Because of the likelihoqd that the sulfate content of the on-site soil or groundwater is sufficient to react adversely with normal cement, we recommend that Type II cement be used in all concrete which will be in contact with soil. Geotechnics Incoq>0rated I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Koll Real Estate Group July 12, 1996 6.1 0 Earth Retaining Structures Project No. 0308-001-00 Doc. #6-0344 Page 14 Backfilling retaining wall with highly expansive soil can increase lateral pressures well beyond normal active or at-rest pressures. We recommend that retaining walls be backfilled with soil having and expansive index of 20 or less. The backfill area should include the zone defined by a 1: 1 sloping plane, back from the base of the wall. Cantilever retaining walls should be designed for an active earth pressure approximated by an equivalent fluid pressure of 35 lbs/ft3. The active pressure should be used for walls free to yield at the top at least 0.2 percent of the wall height. For walls restrained so that such movement is not permitted, an equivalent fluid pressure of 55 lbs/ft3 should be used, based on at-rest soil conditions with level backfill. The above pressures do not consider any surcharge loads or hydrostatic pressures. If these are applicable, they will increase the lateral pressures on the wall and we should be contacted for additional recommendations. Walls should contain an adequate subdrain to eliminate any hydrostatic forces. Typical wall drain details are given in Figure 3. Retaining wall backfill should be compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction, based on ASTM D1557. Backfill should not be placed until walls have achieved adequate structural strength. Heavy compaction equipment which could cause distress to walls should not be used. 6.11 Pavements Two traffic types are assumed: areas of light traffic and passenger car parking (Traffic Index = 4.5), and access drives and truck routes (Traffic Index = 6.0). The project civil engineer should review these values to determine if they are appropriate. Laboratory R- Value tests conducted on a representative sample of the on-site soils indicated an R- Value of 11. Based on the assumed Traffic Index, and the R-Value determined in the laboratory, the following pavement sections are recommended in accordance with the CAL TRANS design method. Geotechnics Incotp0rnted 1-------------------- 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PANEL DRAIN: MIRADRAIN 6000, MIRADRAIN 6200, TENSAR DC1100, JDRAIN 100, OR APPROVED SIMILAR. CdNSTRUCTION SLOPE MINUS 3/4-INCH CRUSHED ROCK ENVELOPED IN FILTER FABRIC (MIFAFI 140N, SUPAC 4NP, OR APPROVED SIMILAR) 1 CUBIC FOOT PER LINEAR FOOT 4-INCH DIAM. ADS OR PVC PERFORATED PIPE NOTES DAMP-PROOFING OR WATER-PROOFING AS REQUIRED COMPACTED BACKFILL . . • . 1/ / / //1/ 11 "/\. _ TO AVOID UNDERMINING FOOTING, ~ DRAIN EXCAVATION SHOULD NOT EXTEND BELOW THIS PLANE 1) Subdrain perforated pipe should have a fall of at least 1.5%. Perforated pipe should outlet to a solid pipe carrying the drainage to a free gravity outfall. Slope of outlet pipe should be at least 1 %. 2) Panel drain should be glued or nailed to the wall and spliced in accordance with the manufacturers recommendations. Fabric side of panel should face the backfill soil. 3) Drain installation should be observed by the geotechnical consultant prior to backfilling. l.,___ _________________ -w--__ --t I n I Geotechnics Incorporated RETAINING WALL DRAIN Koll Real Estate Group CRC Lot51 PROJECT NO. 0308-001-00 DOCUMENT NO. 6-0344 FIGURE3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Koll Real Estate Group July 12, 1996 TRAFFIC INDEX 4.5 6.0 DESIGN SECTION ASPHALT CONCRETE 3 inches 4 inches Project No. 0308-001-00 Doc. #6-0344 Page 15 AGGREGATE BASE 7 inches 10 inches Concentrated truck traffic areas, such as trash truck aprons, should consist of 6 inches of Portland cement concrete over 6 inches of aggregate base course material. Concrete should be reinforced with at least number 4 bars on 24-inch centers, each way. The upper 12 inches of the pavement subgrade should be scarified, brought to slightly over optimum moisture content, and compacted to at least 95 percent of maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D1557. Aggregate base should conform to section 26 of Caltrans Standard Specifications. Alternatively, the base course may conform to Section 200-2 of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, crushed aggregate base, crushed miscellaneous base, or processed miscellaneous base. 7.0 LIMITATIONS OF INVESTIGATION This investigation was performed using the degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable geotechnical consultants practicing in this or similar localities. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the conclusions and professional opinions included in this report. The samples taken and used for testing and the observations made are believed representative of the project site; however, soil and geologic conditions can vary significantly between borings. As in most projects, conditions revealed by excavation may be at variance with preliminary findings. If this occurs, the changed conditions must be evaluated by the geotechnical consultant and additional recommendations made, if warranted. This report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the owner, or of his representative, to ensure that the information and recommendations contained herein are brought to the attention of the necessary design consultants for the project and incorporated into the plans, and the necessary steps are taken to see that the contractors carry out such recommenda- tions in the field. Geotechnics IncoipOrated I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Koll Real Estate Group July 12, 1996 Project No. 0308-001-00 Doc. #6-0344 Page 16 The findings of this report are valid as of the present date. However, changes in the condition of a property can occur with the passage of time, whether due to natural processes or the work of man oh this or adjacent properties. In addition, changes in applicable or appropriate standards of practice may occ;ur from legislation or the broadening of knowledge. Accordingly, the findings of this report may be invalidated wholly or partially by changes outside our control. Therefore, this report is subject to review and should not be relied upon after a period of three years. *** GEOTECHNICS INCORPORATED Anthony F. Belfast, P.E. 40333 Principal Geotechnics Incorporated ttv~lu-~ Kenneth W. Shaw, C.E.G.1251 Project Geologist I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I APPENDIX A REFERENCES American Society for Testing and Materials (1992). Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Section 4, Construction, Volume 04. 08 Soil and Rock; Dimension Stone; Geosynthetics, ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, 1296 p. Anderson, J. G., Rockwell, T. K., Agnew, D. C. (1989). Past and Possible Future Earthquakes of Significance to the San Diego Region, Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 5, No. 2. pp 299-335. Bowles, J. E. (1982). Foundation Analysis and Design, 3rd ed.: New York, McGraw Hill, 816 p. California Division of Mines and Geoiogy (1975). Recommended Guidelines for Determining the Maximum Credible and the Maximum Probable Earthquakes, California Division of Mines and Geology Notes, Nµmber 43. International Conference of Building Officials (1991). Uniform Building Code (with California Amendments) Title 23. Geotechnics Incorporated (1994). As-Graded Geotechnical Report, Unit 5, Carlsbad Research Center,Carlsbad, California, Project No. 0017-001-01, April 29, 1994. Jennings, C. W. (1975). Fault Map of California, California Division of Mines and Geology, California, Geologic Data Map Series. Kennedy, M. P., and Peterson, G. L. (1975). Geology of San Diego Metropolitan Area, California: California Division of Mines and Geology Bulletin 200, 56 p. San Diego Geotechnical Consultants, Inc. (1988). As Graded Geotechnical Report, Carlsbad Research Center, Phase Ill, IV, and V Carlsbad Tract No. 85-24, Carlsbad California, Job No .. 05-2863-006-00-10, April 1, 1988. Trieman, J. A. (1984). The Rose Canyon Fault Zone --A Review and Analysis, California Division of Mines and Geology unpublished report, 106 p. Wesnousky, S. G. (1986). Earthquakes, Quaternary Faults, and Seismic Hazard in California: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 91, no. 812, p. 12587-12631. Geotechnics Incoipomted I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I APPENDIX B FIELD EXPLORATION Field exploration consisted of a visual reconnaissance of the site, and the drilling of 5 exploratory borings on May 21, 1996. An 8-inch diameter, hollow stem, continuous flight auger was used to investigate the subsurface conditions at the site. The maximum depth of exploration was approximately 25½ feet. Soil samples were visually classified in the field and retained for laboratory testing. The approximate locations of the borings are shown on the Geotechnical Map, Figure 2. Logs describing the subsurface conditions encountered are presented on the following Figures 8-1 through 8-6. Disturbed samples were collected by performing Standard Penetration Tests (SPT) in accordance with ASTM D1586-84. SPT samples were sealed in plastic bags, labeled, and returned to the laboratory for testing. Relatively undisturbed samples were collected using a 3-inch outside diameter, ring lined sampler (modified California sampler). Ring samples were sealed in plastic bags, placed in rigid plastic containers, labeled, and returned to the laboratory for testing. The drive weight for the SPT's and California samples was a 140-pound hammer with a free fall of 30 inches. For each sample, we recorded the number of blows needed to drive the sampler 6, 12, and 18 inches. The number of blows needed to drive the final 12 inches is shown on the attached logs under "blows per ft." Bulk samples were also obtained from auger cuttings at selected intervals. Bulk samples are indicated on the boring logs with shading, whereas SPT samples are indicated with diagonal lines, and ring samples with horizontal lines. The borings were located by visually estimating and pacing distances from landmarks shown on the referenced Site Plan by Ware and Malcomb dated February 19, 1996. Elevations of the boring logs were taken from the grading plan prepared by Rick Engineering Company presented in the referenced report by San Diego Geotechnical Consultants. The locations shown should not be considered more accurate than is implied by the method of measurement used and the scale of the map. The lines designating the interface between differing soil materials on the logs may be abrupt or gradational. Soil conditions at locations between the borings may be substantially different from those at the specific locations explored. It should be recognized that the passage of time can result in changes in the soil conditions reported in our logs. Geotechnics IncoipOrated I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .. LOG OF EXPLORATION BORING NO.1 Logged by LP$ Date: Method of Drilling: 8 Inch Hoilow Stem Flight Auger Elevation: I=' i-= w w u:-u. ..I ..J ~ w 0. (.) 0 a: 0. w w :E :E e:. !!::. w a: 0. ct ct ~ ~ DESCRIPTION i!: ; "' "' w ::,i:: i;; "' 0. ~ ..J z 0 w 0 ::, w :E C ..J C al C al 1 Point Loma Formation, Sandy Claystone (CL) -nonplastic, dark olive green, moist, very hard, moderate cementation, with few Fe nodules. 2 (upper 6 inches weathered) 3 32 4 5 6 36 7 8 9 10 Total Depth = 9.5 feet 11 No groundwater ericountered Backfilled 5/21/96 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 PROJECT NO.0308-001-00 GEOTECHNICS INCORPORATED 5/21/96 262 LAB TESTS FIGURE: B-1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Logged by LPS Method of Drilling: Iii i..: w w u:-LI. ..I ..I ti 0. 0. (J w :l: :l: ~ w !:!:::. D. ct ct ~ i= ~ Cl) Cl) w ~ in D. ~ ..I 2 w 0 0: :) w C ..I C Ill C Ill 2 3 34 4 5 6 40 7 8 9 10 57 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ~ 0 w 0: :) I-Cl) 5 :l: LOG OF EXPLORATION BORING NO. 2 Date: 8 Inch Hollow Stem Fiight Auger Elevation: DESCRIPTION Point Loma Formation: Sandy Claystone (CL) -nonplastic, dark olive green, moist, very hard, moderate cementation, white fine grained sand lenses with few Fe nodules and some gypsum inclusions. ( upper 6 inches weathered) Total bepth = 11.5 feet No grqundwater encountered Backfilled 5/21/96 PROJECT NO.0308-001-00 GEOTECHNICS INCORPORATED 5/21/96 264 LAB TESTS FIGURE: B-2 I I LOG OF EXPLORAilON BORING NO. 3 Logged by LPS Date: 5/21/96 Method of Drilling: 8 Inch Hollow Stem Flight Auger Elevation: 268 I i= i-= w w u:-LL -I -I ~ w D. D. 0 0 w 0::: ::E ::E !:!:. w !!:. w 0::: D. <( <( ~ ~ DESCRIPTION LAB TESTS j!: ~ en en I w !le: en en D. 0 ~ -I z 0 w -I 0:: ::> w ::E C m C m C Fill: Sandy Clay (CL) -medium plasticity, light brown, moist, I weak cementation with some pebbles and few 1-8 mm diameter claystone clasts. 2 I 3 I 4 5 I 6 14 101 24 Unit Weight/Moisture Content, sampler ring 7 I 8 1· 9 10 I 11 30 I 12 13 I 14 I 15 No Sample Recovery 16 63 I 17 34 Point Loma Formation: Silty Sand (SM) -Nonplastic, light I 18 brown moist, very hard, moderate cementation, and many 1-5 mm subrounded pebbles. 19 ·1 20 50/4' I PROJECT NO.0308-001-00 GEOTECHNICS INCORPORATED FIGURE: 8-3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I LOG OF EXPLORATION BORING NO. 3 Logged by LPS Date: Method of Drilling: 8 Inch Hollow Stem Flight Auger Elevation: i=-i-= w w ti:' LL ..J ..J 0 -;!!. w ~ 11. 11. w w w :E :E !=.. ~ !!::. 11. <t <t ~ ::, DESCRIPTION i= ~ (/) (/) I-w X: en (/) 11. 0 2: ..J z 0 w ~ ::, w :E C ..J m C m C Point Loma Formation: 21 Sandy claystone (CL) -nonplastic, light brown, moist, very hard, moderate cementation, and many 1-5 mm 22 diameter subrounded pebbles. 23 24 25 55/6' 26 Total Depth = 25.5 feet 27 No groundwater encountered Backfilled 5/21/96 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 PROJECT NO.0308-001-00 . GEOTECHNICS INCORPORATED 5/21/96 268 LAB TESTS FIGURE: 8-4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Logged by LPS Method of Drilling: i=-..,: w w u:-u. ..J ..J w D. 0 ~ D. w w ~ ~ !!::. '=-D. <( <( ~ i= ~ II) II) w ~ en D. 0 ~ ..J z w ~ :::, w 0 ..J C co 0 co ..... : .. 1 : ... x . ............. 2 :::::,::::::: •,•,•,•'•,•:• 3 18 ... 4 :t:}: Ai! 5 .I 105 6 34 =s§ -7 8 9 10 11 30 12 13 14 15 85 103 16 17 18 19 20 ~ 0 w ~ ~ II) 0 ~ 19 23 LOG OF EXPLORATION BORING NO.4 Date: 8 Inch Hollow Stem Flight Auger Elevation: DESCRIPTION Fill: Sandy Clay (CL) -medium plasticity, light brown, moist, homogeneous, and weak cemehtation. Point Loma Formation: Sandy Claystone (CL) -nonplastic, dark olive green, moist, very hard, modercite cementation, with few Fe nodules and little decomposing plant debris. Total Depth= 16.5 feet No groundwater encountered Backfilled 5/21/96 PROJECT N0.0308-001-00 GEOTECHNICS INCORPORATED 5/21/96 264 LAB TESTS Sieve Analysis Expansion Index Unit Weight/Moisture Content, sampler ring Unit Weight/Moisture Content, sampler ring FIGURE: 8-5 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I LOG OF EXPLORATION BORING NO.5 Logged by LPS Date: Method of Drilling: 8 Inch Hollow Stem Flight Auger Elevation: i=-i-: w w ii:' LL ..J ..J ~ w 0:: a. a. 0 w :E :E !:!:.. w w 0:: '=-a. ct ct ~ ~ DESCRIPTION ::c ; ti) ti) I-w lie: in ti) a. 0 2: ..I z 5 w a: ::> w :ii: C ..J C Cll C Cll Fill: Sandy Silty clay (CUML) -medium plasticity, brown, 1 moist, weak cementation and verigated with 1-4 mm diameter dark olive green siltstone clasts. 2 3 4 5 Point Loma Formation: Sandy Claystone (CL) -nonplastic, dark olive green, moist, very hard, moderate cementation, with few Fe nodules 6 32 and some 1-2 mm diameter gypsum crystals. 7 8 9 10 11 48 12 Total Depth= 11.5 feet 13 Groundwater encountered @ 28 feet Backfilled 5/21/96 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 PROJECT NO.0308-001-00 GEOTECHNICS IN CORPORA TED 5/21/96 257.5 LAB TESTS FIGURE: 8-6 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I APPENDIX C LABORATORY TESTING Selected representative samples of soils encountered were tested using test methods of the American Society for Testing and Materials, or other generally accepted standards. A brief description of the tests performed follows: Classification: Soils were classified visually according to the Unified Soil Classification System. Visual classification in accordance with ASTM D2487 was supplemented by laboratory testing of selected samples. The soil classifications are shown on the Boring Logs. Expansion Index: The expansion potential of a selected soil sample was characterized by using the test method ASTM D4829. The results of the tests are presented on Figure C-2 . Particle Size Analysis: Particle size analyses were performed in accordance with ASTM D422. The grain size distribution was used to determine presumptive strength parameters used to develop foundation design criteria. The results are given in Figure C-1. In-Situ Moisture/Density: The in-place moisture content and dry unit weight of selected samples were determined using relatively undisturbed samples from the liner rings of a 2.5 inch ID Modified California sampler. The dry unit weight and moisture content of the samples tested are shown on the Boring Logs. Geotechnics Incorporated ------------------- 100 ---... --- 1-1/2" 3/4" 3/8" #4 #8 U.S. Standard Sieve Sizes #16 #30 #50 #100 #200 Hydrometer 90 r-m__ "111 80 "I',.. ,.., .... .c 70 Cl '<ii ---...· ~ ~ 60 >, ,Q, 1i:... .... m";,_ ... Q) 50 C u:: t'-.... ----.... C 40 Q) (.) ... Q) a. 30 20 10 0 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 Grain Size in Millimeters COARSE I FINE COARSE I MEDIUM I FINE SILT AND GRAVEL SAND CLAY SAMPLE UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION: CL ATTERBERG LIMITS EXPLORATION NUMBER: B4 LIQUID LIMIT: SAMPLE LOCATION: 1' -4' DESCRIPTION: SANDY LEAN CLAY PLASTIC LIMIT: PLASTICITY INDEX: Geotechnics SOIL CLASSIFICATION Project No. 0308-001-00 Incorporated Koll Real Estate Group Document No. 6-0344 CRC Lot 51 FIGURE C-1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I EXPANSION TEST RESULTS (ASTM D 4829) SAMPLE I EXPANSION INDEX I 84 @O' -4' 83 UBC TABLE NO. 29-C, CLASSiFICATION OF EXPANSIVE SOIL EXPANSION INDEX 0-20 21-50 51-90 91-130 Above 130 ..:....._Geotechnics . Incorporated POTENTIAL EXPANSION Very low Low Medium High Verv hiah Laboratory Test Results Koll Real Estate Group CRC Lot 51 Project No. 0308-001-00 Document No. 6-0344 Figure C-2 ' - NON-RESIDENTIAL CERTIFICATE: Non-Residential Land Owner, please read this option carefully and be sure you throughly understand the options before signirJg. The option you choose will affect your payment of the developed Special Tax assessed on your property. This option is available only at the time of the first bl.ilding permit issuance. Property owner signature is required before a building permit will be issued. Your signature is confirming the accuracy of all parcel and ownership information shown. Telephone Project Address Carlsbad CA 9200 City State Zip Code City State Zip Code Assessor's Parcel Number, or APN and Lot Number if not yet subdivided. qc.,-L-0 s.) Building Permit Number As cited by Ordinance No. NS-155 and adopted by the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, the City is authorized to levy a special Tax in Community Facilities district No. 1. All non-residential property, upon the iss~eof the first bl.ilding permit, shall have the option to (1} pay the SPECIAL DEVEl,.OPMENT TAX ONE- 11ME or (2} assume the ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX-DEVELOPED PROPERTY for a period not to exceed twenty- five (25} years. Please ii:tdicate your choice by initialing the appropriate line below: OPTION (1): OPTION (2): I elect to pay the SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT TAX ONE-TIME no~, as a one-time payment. Amount o_f1 One-Time Special Tax: $ 2 '14 1 ':\ lC\. I. . Owner's Initials ,-Mp-: . · I elect to pay the SPECIAL DEVEI-OPMENT TAX ANNUALLY for a i:1e~9d not to exceed twenty-five (25} years. Maximum Annual Special Tax: $ 3:. 3. 1 S''i . 'Vt . · Owner Initials · ----. . I DO HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENAL TY OF PERJURY THAT THE UNDERSIGNED IS THE PROPERTY OWNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND THAT I UNDERSTAND AND WILL COMPLY WITH THE PROVISIONS AS STATED ABOVE. . Signature of Property Owner Title PrintName · Date The City of Carlsbad has not independently verified tt,e information shown above. Therefore, we accept no responsibility as to the accuracy or completeness of thisinfot-mation. NON-RESIDENTIAL CERTIFICATE Koll tech Center/CRC -L9t 51 Signature Page FARADAY CENTER, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company By: CRC-Faraday, LP., a California Limited Partnership Its Managing Member By: KREG-OC, L.P., a California Limited Partnership Its General Partner By: KREG Operating Company, a Delaware Corporation Its General Partner Its: Vice President CERTIFICATE OF COMPUANCE CITY OF CARLSBAD Plan Check No. C.. 6 ?ft>;? 035 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 2075 LAS PALMAS DR., CARLSBAD, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 This form shall be used to determine the amount of school fees for a project and to verify that the project applicant has complied with the school fe~ requirements. No building permits for the projects shall be issued until the certification is signed by the appropriate school district and returned to the City of Carlsbad Building Department. SCHOOL DISTRICT: >< Carlsbad Unified h 801 Pine Avenue Carlsbad CA 92009 (434-0661) Encinitas Union --101 South Rancho Santa Fe Rd. Encinitas CA 92024 (944-4300) San Marcos Unified 1290 West San Marcos Blvd. San Marcos CA 92024 (74~776) San Dieguito Union High School --710 Encinitas Boulevard Encinitas CA 92024 (753-6491) , , fo.-rM ~ C m+~-Y) L~APN:;J./;;i -./d!2-a 5· t50 Project Address: 20 9 I :B µ...f\, e2. c -to ti" d @J · C {)._(-"'IS b d . CA: · Project Applicant: I I 7 RESIDENTIAL: SQ. FT. of living area _____ number of dwelling units _____ _ SQ. FT. of covered area ____ SQ. FT. of garage area ______ _ COMMERCIAi/iNDUSTRiAL: SQ. FT. AREA l O 'b) £; LO 3 Prepared by f-k>} L 4 C l 01&d. Date __ I.__O_·-i-· 1-15_,_( _q7 __ _ K ?d l 1 'B ..e_ c..-l 8 4--k ( n::o u p FEE CERTIFICATION (To be oompleted by the Schoor District) y_ Applicant has complied with fee requirement under Government Code 53080 Project is subject to an existing fee agreement -- --,.-Project is exempt from Government Code 53080 --Final Map approval and construction started before September 1, 1986. (other school fees paid) __ Other _______________________ ~----- Residential Fee Levied: $ ________ based on _______ sq. ft.®---.--,.--- Commllndust Fee Levied: $ 3~, lo~ 8, 9 D based on I I b 11 g {p 3 sq. ft. @ • 3 D (f.. S. +. .:-.. ' J. H. Blat ~ V (.Yi • Assistant Su~t N /:,,,...!,, ..... ~ Business Setvices b ;)-6 \----1--~-~~------------~~----------=~----\,Sdiool -District Official Title Date ~ ~· \ cJ- rJ c,,..) I - J I I ___, G,. I , 1/ ,,,. i .sJI 4 ]:" ..> v , 1 1 r t \ • i i I \ i . ' i t . l t ' l {; \: I l: t .. F I' l ~· ------i .. . . ·., -j, ··11 ·, •' BU I ·L,D ING P.E RM IT · PCR No: PCR98034 P+oject No: A9602898 Development No: 04/07/98 08:03 Page 1 of 1 .JobAddress: 2091 RUTHERFORD RD Permit Type: .PLAN CHECK REVISION -P~rcel No: 21~-120-25-00 . Valua.tion: O Suite: . 5767 04/07/9'B 0001 01 02 Lot#~ 51 C-PRi1T 218uOC< Construction Type:.NEW · Occupancy Group: Reference#: CB962035 Status: ISSUED Pescription:· REVISIONS-CHANGED PANEL OPENGS . : ROOF DRAINAGE,TRUCK RAMP, 714 660-9128 Applied: 03/25/98 Apr/Issue: 04/07/98 Entered By: JM I FINAL APPROVAL- } JN("'>P. . I I ..) •c--DATE __ _ f CLEARANCE l.. -----~.;,_-· -----..... -_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-:- CITY OF CARL$BAD 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 I'- PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad cA· 92009 (760) 438-1161 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY PLAN CHECK Nof)6£1fp:J~ EST. VAL. _________ _ Plan Ck. Deposit--"""-------- ~:~:._at-ed_B_v ______ -MV~~;;)J~~.:t:4:@~= ~ .. :"1. · ... PR . ·-ECT INFORMA,1:;TI,...o...,r,1.,..-:t:~~ a· B11sinass Name lat this addr Address (include-Bldg/Suite #) Legal Description Lot No. Subd/vision· Name/Number Unit No. Phase No. Total # of. units Existin ~l~/)'JIJ Name Address City State/Zip Telephone# ;4:· .' ir.PR0PERTY·oWNER '·,··· -• I ~·I"~- I ' • ' , • Name Address City State/Zip Telephone# . 's: . .,~'CONTRACtOR !' COMPANY NAME·-. -:· ·--~·-~;-·~:·;-"'.1~;--: cc::---:--::;-7'.~~·?:~!:,';";7 :::'m:"'?~:-:::::~-:,: ::::.t~ .. -.:"='..·.b,\"~ ~:::".Y:'-~1':;7L ~:::~r:::::~~ ...... -,, ; ' , (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Coda: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, Improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to Its issuance, also requires the app_licant for such permit to file a signitd statement that he Is licensed pursuant to tha provisions of the Contractor's License Law (Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or that he Is exempt therefrom, and tha basis for tha alleged exemptiQn. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant _for I permit subjects tha 1pplic1rit to I clvil-panalty of not more than five hundred dollars ($5001). Name Address City State/Zip Telephone# State License # ________ _ License Class ________ _ City Business License # _______ _ Designer Name Address City State/Zip Telephone State License # ------'----- ·G. WORKERS' COMPENSATION ·,-•. . . . . -_ _.. ··· ... · · ·'. _: ·""."--:. -.'. ":· .• :· ': _:_.,· __ -,,-~,--: · ,,,·;·>,:· :~!: · ._7.-.• ;;·.tW.,'\;,~1--: .. ··. ::,:-~:: • ·,-_., ·- Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury !)ne of tha following·decl1r1tions: O 1-have-ilnd will maintain I certificate of' consent to 11lf-insu.r11 for workers' .comp1n11tion ·as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Coda, for the performance of the work for which this permit is-issued. · 0 I have ·and will mafntain workers' compensation, IS required by Section 37.00 of the Labor Coda, for the performance of the work for which this ,permit is issued. My worker's compailsation insuranc, carrier and policy number are: Insurance Company____________________ Policy No. _ Expiration Date. _______ _ (THIS SECTION-NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNl>RED DOLLARS ($100) OR LESSI O CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the-work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any parson in any manner so IS to become su~jact to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. . · WARNING: Failure to 11~e w~en· cornpenutlon conrqa 11 unlawful, and shaft subject an employer to criminal panaltlaa and civil flnaa up to ona hundred thousand dollars ($100,0001, in addition to the coat of cornpenutlon, damages II provided for in Sactlon 3706 of the Labor coda, lntara1t and attomay'a faa,. SIGNATURE ___ '----------.....,...------------------DATE ________ _ ··1.· · ·· ow~ER-BuiLDE1roEcLARAr1or.1 · .. ,. ·' ·. ,. ·'·._.· , ,,.,,. ::--·. · ·: ·-:·. ,··~.-f1:··:··, ... _,_,_,.t ··: ·,·:··:.,-·::-::':·?:<··~-,~)?1,r·.,.~7~:r·:-:,"1:·~:,7'1:~i.'fi·•·:~r·~·:~;·i!:-1 · ,. ''.''"' '!1:;r::,_,.r•:.,:,,-:·,_,·:··,. , I hereby affirm that l·am-a_xempt from tha Contractor's Licensa Law for tha following reason:· 0 · I, IS owner of tha p_roparty or my amployaas with wages as their sole compensation, will do tha work and the structure Is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Coda: The Contractor's Ucansa Law dou not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himsalt -or through his own emplo_yu,, provided that 111eh Improvements are not intended or offered for 11la. If, however, the building or Improvement Is sold within ona yaar of corilplation, th~ owner-builder will have tha burden of proving that he did.l'!ot.build or Improve for the purpo11 of 11la). D I, IS owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to· construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's Licansa Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or lmprov11 thereon, and contracts ,for such projects with contractorlsl licen11d pursuant to the Contractor's Licen11 Law). 0 I am exempt under Sitctiqn ______ Business and Professions Code for this reason: 1. I personally plan to provide the major labor 1nd.m1tari1l1 for construction 0Mhe•propo111d property Improvement. 0 YES ONO 2. I (ha.va / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. 3. I_ have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (Include nama / address / phone number / contractors license number): 4. I plari to provide portions of the work; but I have hired the following person-to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (Include name / address / phone number / contractors-licans_e number): _ _ _ _ _ · 5. I wiil-provide some of the work, -but I have contracted (hired) th1·following.pa'raon1 to provi!la the work indicated (Include name/ address/ phone number/ type of work):_·----....:....--------------~----------------------------------- PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE ____________________ _ DATE ________ _ 1cciMPLriE:tH1s ·sectioN·Foii ND~DE.imAL' auiU>iNo:P£fiMiti'oNlY~~t1i .0~-~::~r~2.!l;·\,f~~-~~~1f:4:i,,:·~"r'r.'.f::7l'.~;~~1',:.:::' :~ _, __ . ·,-:'_!'·1~·::.:-"". ·-""':~~:2 Is the /IPPlicant or future l;luilding occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Prasley-Tannar H1zardoils Substance Account Act? 0 YES O NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from tha air pollution control distr~ct or air quality management district? 0 YES O NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of tha outer boundary of a school site? 0 YES O NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE-OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE-OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES A~D THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL l>ISTRICT. fs,""'.'cON$TRUCticiiiH.aibiN<fAGENC\':.y. :::·r:-:r,:r:·1:,:r"':·.\: "":;::;n:rr'.~;i';1'.;,:Jr,}~~~-';'.}'.~·~~:''.'.':('-:';'":~'':-°':'.'?('•',J'_;?':' ._'.'~~'?.'' :T'···:··'.,·;c:1~:-·. -. ·: ' . .. .·;. ..M. :·. "·: · ,· I hereby affirm that there is a.construction lending agency for tha performance of tha work for which this permit is issued (Sac. 30971il Civil Code). LENDER'S NAME_______________ LENDER'S ADDRESS ___ ....,.. __________________ _ :9:--· ·-··APPLICANT'. CERTIFICATION ·:-1~,,;,: · .. ·.-: ;.''·:.-'. :r: : ~,.,;• :-:·:-::·::-.,.,,·~:-::-::::7:''.'.';~~f'-"-~'.:':~:~:-·::::v.~'~:J"'.?1' I'':"'t·':'.!:'\~'7,;:,~;:;;r.;:'!ll";;v:-::~-""'"'''"".?? -~'..;"' · _.,.. " ; :· · ,, .... ···: · .. ·r.• · :' I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information ·Is ~orrect and t~at the Information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating ·to building construction .. I hereby authorize representatives of the Citt of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAIN.ST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0" du demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories In height. EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by tha Building Official un tha rovisions of this Coda shall axpira by limitation and become null and void if tha building or work authorized by such p · · commenced within 36 day ram the data of such permit or If the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any ti af-...+,,ru,nrl"'1J cad r · of 180 days (Section 106.4.4 Uniform Building Coda). DATE ~ ~ APPLICANT'S SIGNA T WHITE: Fila YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance EsGil -Corp·orati·on 'l.n Partnusfiip Witfi (jovernment for '13ui[i[ing Safety DATE: APRIL 3, 1998 D APPLICANT ~JURIS. JURISDICTION: CARLSBAD D PLAN REVIEWER D FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 96-2035 REV (PCR 98-34) SET: I PROJECT ADDRESS: CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER PROJECT NAME: LOT 51 ·• The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. D The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are reso.lved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. D The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. D The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: • Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the. plan check has been completed. D Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date con'tacted: (by: ) Fax#: Mail Telephone Fax In Person • REMARKS: Revisions to dimensions and truck ramp. Original P/C # CB 96-2035. By: Ali Sadre Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA D crvi D EJ O Pc 3/26 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (619) 560-1468 + Fax (619) 560-1576 · VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: CARLSBAD PLAN CHECKNO.: 96-2035 REV PCR 98-34 PRE:PARED BY: SADRE DATE: 4/3/98 BUILDING ADDRESS: CARLSBAD RESEARCH -BUILDING OCCUPANCY: NO CHANGE CENTER TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: NO CHANGE BUILDING PORTION · BYlbQING AReA VALUATION VALUE , __ &, \ MULTIPLIER ($) ·' -":"I. '-· 1 REVSIONS ro 2 HOURS. 87.15/HR. 17 4.30 ESGIL FEE TRUCK RAMPS & DIMENSIONS Air Conditioning - Fire Sprinklers - TOTAL VALUE UBC Building Permit Fee: $ UBC Plan Check Fee: $ 217.88 CITY FEE Comments: Sheet 1 of 1 valuefee.dot * 0 C: C: C: "' "' "' a: a: ·C:: ~DD ~OD PLANNING DEPARTMENT BUIL:DING! PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST Pc-12-9 &-o -:sr Plancnzt N.o. Cli '14-20~5 Address Z OC1 I 12-,u '!flt/2-/:;f?lp fe,D. Planner . • ?ywch,_ . . . Phone (619) 438-1161, extension '13/"11 APN: 2( ?_-(z.o-z.. r Type of Project & Use: /JJ~T J'fll:llL Net Project Density: -DU/AC Zoning: r:Jv1 .. . Genera.I Plan: p:z:;. CFD ~fi~~~~ # I Date of participation: Facilities Management Zone: s·::: _s=:--7 .... 9/ Remaining net dev acres: t:) (For non-residential development: Type of land used created by this permit:/Al{)µ.sz::-1Jqf7 f?J/'L-IL ) Legend:. C8J Item Complete (0 Item Incomplete -Needs your action Environmental Review Required: YES-. NO K._ TYPE __ _ DATE OF COMPLETION: ------~--- Compliance with conditions of approval?· If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: Discretionary Action Required: YES __ NO __ TYPE 5P/.Clf?t.-: PChl (2w/tstu- APPROVAl-/RESO. NO. -------.-'-_DATE ___ _ PROJECT NO.-----~--,.-- OTHER RELATED CASES:---,-.,..........--------.----------,------- Cornpliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of AR),'J. "'2'.:s!.&:~~~~t:Sfi!..___t!!_.12::..·~~~IALk:::-.. ~~~1/2__~!!:)c)-!__~'t!Le,1J.J1LAL.~/i?Q.~!...!.L- l ~t 'II/~ Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance Project site located in Coastal Zone? YES NoK CA Coastal Commission Authority? YES NO If California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact them at -3111 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 200, San Diego CA 92108-1725; (619) 521-8036 Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt): Coastal· Permit Dete'rmination Form already completed? YES If NO, complete Coastal Permit Determination Form now. Coastal Permit Determination Log #: Follow-Up Actions: NO 1) Stamp Building Plans as "Exempt" or "Coastal Permit Required" (at minimum Floor Plans). 2) Complete Coastal Permit Determination Log as needed. ~DD )g DD 1§ D 0 ~D 0 txl 0 0 moo pQDD boo lnclusionary Housing Fee required:-YES __ NO !.S,._ {Effective date of lnclusionary Housing Ordinance -May 21 , 1993 .) • Data Entry Completed? YES NO , (Enter CB #; UACT; NEXT12; Construct housing YIN; Enter Fee Amoui:it (See fee schedule for amount); Return) Site Plan: 1 . Provide a fully dimensional site plal") drawn to scale. Show: North arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way width, dimensional setbacks and existing topographical lines. 2. Provide legal description of property and assessor's parcel number. Zoning: 1. -Setbacks: ~-~ Front: Required Interior Side: Required Street Side: Required Rear: Required 2. Accessory structure setbacks: Front: Required Interior Side: Required ¥11 Street Side: Required Rear: Required Structure separation: Required \ ... .. 3. Lot Coverage: Required. L/-Of 4. Height: ~ -I Required --J J ------ 5. Parking: Spaces Required stO Guest Spaces Required ------ Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown ----,---- Shown /2 Shown =M=1/j=== Shown ~ -=--------Shown ------- Shown Cf. G-.7 Shown 5'-tC:... Shown ------ Additional Comments iu r-Pell( a,J A---/,O /2-1:r: 1Af~#/4A16 COtMP)e.:r • 5t>Acl;fj~ OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER /~ DATE l(-t-f'G City of_ Carlsbad . . 96297-1 . Frire Department • Bureau of Prevention Plan Review: Requirements Category: Building Plan Check Date of Report: Wednesday, April 1, 1998 Reviewed by: f¼,JC:i -&.~A Contact Name Address City, State Bldg. Dept. No. PCR98-034 Ware_ & Malcomb/Irv. 18002 Cowan Job Name Lot 5.1 --------'----'--------'--'-----'------ Job Address 2090 Rutherford Ste. or Bldg. No. ____ _ ~ Approved -The item you have submitted for review has been approved. the approval is based on plans; information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifica- tions, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. 0 Disapproved -Please see the attached report of deficiencies. Please make corrections to plans or specifications necessary to indicate compliance with applicable codes and standards. SLJbmit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. For Fire Department Use Only · Review 1st __ _ 2nd---'-'---3rd~-- Other Agency ID CFD Job# __ 96_2-"-9_7-_1_ File#~--- 2560 Orion Way • Carlsbad, California 92008 • (619) 931-2121 , , BU IL DING -PERMIT· 07 /Qi/9-8 08: 05 Page 1 o-f · 1 Job-Address: 2091 RUTHERFORD RD- Permit·Type: PLAN CHECK REVISION -Parcel No: 212-120-25-00 Valuation~ O Suite: Lot#: 51 Occupancy Group: Reference#: Description: REVISION OF MOMENT FRAME ~ FOOTING CITY OF CARLSBAD PCR_No: PCR98103 Project Nq: ~9602898 Development No: NEW ISSUED 06/17/98 07/01/98 RMA 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (619) 438:..1161 ... FOR OFFICE USE O'Y'JX PLAN CHECK NO. rt:1:A C/V~ t \ -PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 2075 las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad CA 92009 (760) 438-1161 EST. VAL. __________ _ Legal Des ription ·, · Lot No. Subdivision-Name/Numbe~ Unit No. 2. -2.0. -;). Phase No. Total # of units # of Bathrooms Name ,,/. State License·# _7."--~.c..-t/,,_:l.._. _f-.... T'--~-- Designer Name Address City State/Zip Telephone State License If-~-~-----~-- ,$: ' v,tO,RKERS"'.COMPENSATior.r.;. :,'. ', ·: :,-:, : ·: ';{-, '... ::, .. ', i -,:,,j,_, .:':-'' . ~:>:".";:-s:-1.s~;:~,tt[~-:i::l:: :,;:,:;;~ ,::, :; ~,f::?:~<i ,'~:.>i:·~:><~: ; :--; ·:.:_ •" , \.;: :· \. ' Workers'. Compensation Decl11ration~ I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: 0-I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. '¢ I have arid will maintain workers' compensation, .as required by Section· 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My worker's c mpensatio~.insurance carrier and pol~cy-number are: V• • 1 A 19, 7 ;f ,f. 6,_ ,,.. Insurance Company demn1~ Policy No.~ VVC... 6V .,-r;20Cf Expiration Date iJ() '/f3 (THIS SECTION NEEp NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS R ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($100) OR LESS) D CERTIFICATE QF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws·6f California. WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation cover"ge is unlawful. and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred ~.hJ;-tlwusand dollars($ 00 00), in addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Lab r code, i terest and attorney's fees. "fi~SIGNATURE,_L..::.~-J..-.1..=_,-=--.______________________ DATE . --'1~ ';~V',/NER~BlJILDE -DEC_L:ARATION·,: . '. ..... :. , , , ,·,•,i'.:i,'•·'.··~:-;f;::'.~-.::':,';--:--,--•,;;;,,,, .. ·,,-. ::,:,:/.· :,_. .. :,.-, e".·'.·,·,r:,-:/-/,': I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the-Contractor's License Law-for the followin~ reason: D I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply·to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his qwn employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold wittiin on!!. year of completion, the·owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). D I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with-licensed contrac,tors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owher of property .who builds or improves ·thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). D I am exempt under ·Section ______ Business and Professions Code for this reason: 1. I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. D YES ONO ·2. I (have / ·have not) signed an application for a building permit for tlie proposed work. 3. . I have contracted _with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): 4. I plan to provide portions of the work, but i have hired the following person -to coordlnate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone number l contractors license number):. _________________ .:.... ____________________________ _ 5. I will provide some of the-work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type of work):. ______ --'~--'---------'--------'----------------------------------- PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE______________________ DATE ________ _ ·¢o~P.!:rtE'·'tHis·'sec:rIofi'!=Qll' NQN~Jl't!SiQEJVTW; Blilli~ING->P.ERMl'{$]>,.~t;,;,;f:1,~)·,;.;'":•:I=-];,;s:.fi~; ],{\;~".J:{f{fi·::~i:~~i.:{:?<-: ,:1:?:;:'.5/'';, Is -the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 ·or 25534 of the·Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? 0 YES [5a NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? 0 YES ~ NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the-outer boundary of a school-site? 0 YES E'.I NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY.MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS-OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLI.JTION (;ONTROL DISTRICT. ;s-;;:,,,.:~?>N~tfiv.ct1<:>ft1.~EN:PiN9:A~eN~vL:'. :;". · . .':: ._. .:, ·-·.:: >. !·hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097(i) Civil Code). LENDER'S NAME _____________ _ LENDER'S ADDRESS. _ _,_ ______ -'------------------ ,g~·-,· APPJ:.ICANi:c~(l'l'IF.ICAJ1orf::'-;: .:---~-. I certify that I have ·read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the Citt of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended ays (Section 106.4.4 Uniform Building Code). '{ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE ;• ~ EsGil Corporation 1n Partnersliip witli qovemment for '13uiufing $(1.fe.tg DATE: JUNE 23, 1998 D APPLICANT ·~ ~JURIS. JURISDICTION: CARLSBAD D PLAN REVIEWER D FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 96-2032 & 2035 Rev. (PCR98-103) ___ SET: I PROJECT ADDRESS: 2090 RUTHERFORD & 2080 FARADAY PROJECT NAME: OFFICE/WAREHOUSE (SHELL ONLY') [8J The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. D The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. D The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant . contact person. D . The ~pplicant's copy of the check· ust has been sent to: . [8J Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. D Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. · Person contacted: Telephone#: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person [8J REMARKS: Moment frame footing revision under this plan change. , . '··.:· By: Alf Sadre Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA D CM D EJ D .PC 6/18 "' trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San ·Diego, California 92123 + (619) 560-1468 + Fax (619) 560-1576 YAL,!.J{\TION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: CARLSBAD PREPARED BY: SADRE BUILDING ADDRESS: 2090 RUTHERFORD BUILDING PORTION Bl:Jlb9I~JG l>rReA fSEf. ft.~ MOMNET FRAME 2 HOURS FOUNDATION REVISIONS UNDER ·THIS PLAN CHANGE ... -.. Ai'r Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE USC Building Permit Fee: UBC Plan Check Fee: Comments: PLAN CHECK NO.: 96-2035 (PCR98-103) DAiE: 6/23 BUILDING OCCUPANCY: NO CHANGE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: NO CHNAGE VALUATION VALUE MULTIPLIER ($) 87.15/HR. 174.30 ESGIL FEE -. . ....... $ C[TY FEE $ 217.88 Sheet 1 of 1 valuefee.dot KLT · CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS 3430 Irvine Avenue, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Tel: (714) 263-1308 Fax: (714) 263-1310 PROJECT CARl>BAD B-C .. # t:-1 DATE ~ •/?#,?SHEET ___ OF __ • ) SUBJECT B. et/J~D 4~11~ @llt4-fro& 7/IE R 1C.,1 !> fA4Ue /t/6.~T Ta ~/¥e B .. CALC. BY ____ JOB ffb ~ ?4- f .f~oM Of!...10 ;Af .4 L L;fk;.,1 F c. I~. ~ crb 1-ossj f Cl( CZ&" I ;;_J " ., KLT ·-CONSULTING STRUCIURAL ENGINEERS 3430 Irvine Avenue, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Tel: (714) 263-1308 Fax: (714) 263-1310 ~~-) PROJECT _____ '-------,-----'--'---~--~----DATE _____ SHEET f ~IQ OF __ _ J SUBJECT --------~-------------CALC. BY ___ --'. JOB _______ _ Mc?MiNT f~MF-De-'7IGthJ ~ ~ ~AX ::::!51 t---~ .. -· ..... ,-·-·· ! ----. . . ! :--··· ....... . _: .... ~ -, • l --· ~=~-~ ~::. I I~ I ,e, --·-· ---··'"·-·H·-·---~----0 -0 . 0 . ' t4 . .. l ____ .:, .. --. ___ ! ! I . . -· --; -. -·7 . -__ · "] . -----i 1 . fc:?--I ' ... ----! ---------; -.------i • ··---·~• ··--•••-•,-,•..-v__J ' --____ ] ' . . ' l --··--·--·-.... ---i I ' .. -··---·-... -·-·-----i · ... ___ · ___ .J __ ,._ ----· ... -... ~-· ---: . --· -f ··--.. __ ,. __ _ ' . ·-·-·-. ·---·---.. --· ---·-· . : -!--t--· -· .. -·-·;--,- . ---.. ____ ;_ _____ , ' I ~ (~ -,,-:::.,,._., t . JD~. t ~L~T ? I' B Lt>l1 2 '£.,-\~~~-~ ;?er<~ /4/)(~~H PK4f11£.. J:.lf'.I. <! Ft'vf'I c1~,.f1ov1 c; tt Pl.A lo\ ¥-------'- _.,. v1---<:~ l.· ·!;rw·~ ----· 7{ ------ i ,,'~ I \ ll I~ ,.- ·' u:. • ll- ('_l",V v.11+~sz ·{~--]. . I I r Lrr ~4 E==-i7=4=--tff=;~r ~~-1¥f3· · , -.. --. I l 1 : , .• . "'1 • :" l ..,,~ · j 1. .:, ~ c: ' ,....,... -----____,r-~ ... J ~ f..i:,o'DMl--i @ THJt:-, L~1lorl 10 ,¼oT II'-\ P(..."'C.~ jET.. •. I I"'::!-..... .... ~--~ ~, , ... NI -" £l ! ~ u.:., "' i· q;:- ~ 14... -~ k k,, -~ Q:) ACJ eu,u af' FCl::>T!Nc-69--TEt'\\'lA-rr E-Lf,\.! (:? Mo,--ieNT peAW'E. .~-- ..,, C ~ ;,• PJ I~: ! U) I I'. ill 11 ..., \&\ N w,i .. 0 0) '1J '1J 0 N 1 --PROJECT KLT CONSULTING S1RUCTURAL ENGINEERS 3430 Irvine Avenue, Newport Beach, CA 92660 ;i;el: (714) 263-1308 Fax: (714) 263-1310 \~ u LL -Lu T 5 I L fH< .. (.,j f/i) DATE 3 -11 -'f 8 SHEET __ OF __ l ,SUBJECT -------------'-------CALC. BY _____ JOB 4 (pO::f 4: f.f. • 'I ll .. · . .. . .. !E".)(IS{l/1/G Ct:llJC. t=Ao (i:oP1.JGJ e2,:#e, BA~ coJJr. c r * e>) w/~1i~ ~ 1::z!I .c. - Vl?W CONC. atzA~ i BU I I.. i) I-NG P E R t1 I T . 08/13/98 11 [ 21 , Pa9e 1 of 1 ,J.ob i'.h:h:Lre:,s= 2091. RUTHERFORD RD p~rm]t Type: PLAN CHECK REVISION Par~el No: 212-120-2,-0o Ualuatton= 0 · Occ:·up,e:rn cy ·Group: Desc:ription: REVISION-STRUCTURAL : LOT 51~CB962035 FINAL P.i\'' CITY OF CARLSBAD 8135 PCF~ M~j: PCR9l3:l~)!, Project No= A9602~9B Development Noi~ )VAL "'· ---------- 2075 Las ,Palmas Dr., Carlsbadi CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 PERMIT APPLICATION FOR OFFICE USE ONLY - PLAN CHECK No.7tKf8135 CITY OF CARLSBAD BUlLDING DEPARTMENT 2075 La$ Palmas Dr., Carlsbad CA 92009 (760) 438-1161 EST. VAL _________ _ Plan Ck. Depos:.:it:-._------- Validated By_.._,....&..,;;_,_;~,:;1-;.....,-t.~~ Date _______ --=-=1-~4 -L.bl-- Le!iaj Description Unit No. Phase No. Total # of units '2/7--ZZL?.;.zS: Assessor's Parcel # Proposed Use -/8?,:r Fax# Name Address City S.tate/Zip Telephone# Jf-:ffcom:~ctpjff;pp~f!Artf:f~lt::~:'.:".1~J:';:·;J;~~"?:.t:~ :t·:0:r::::.;.:.~.1:c·r:-;:ttt .:·,. ,. : ,., -. ,, ... · _ .... , (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the· applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (Chapter !!, commending with Section 7000 of Division. 3 of the Business and Professions Code) -or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section .7031.5 by any-applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars [$5001). Name ·Address City State/Zip Telephone# State License # _________ _ License Class _________ _ City Business License # _______ _ Designer Name Address City State/Zip Telephone State License#~--------- i,'€2:W.O.Rl:{E.l~S[;CQ1'1f.'~~~ TJON,.G'.";::',:,;·::. .. ~~:.:J:a:· ,;., -.:5..~:.:.: . .'::. '.;_;:;.:' ::;,;;,;.,:.~ ,;.s;.,.,.~ ..• v<,oc Workers: Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following d?clarations: ... ,: ... :-,· : ,,. -,,:;" -~ >, ,M--. ·o f have and will maintain .a certificate of consent to self-.insiJre for workers'' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work'for which this permit is issued. . 0 I have-and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the-La~or Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Insurance Company______________________ ·Policy No. Expiration Date _______ _ (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS 1$1001 OR LESS) 0 CERTIFICATE OF'EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work fo~ .which this permit is issue_d, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage 11 ·unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100,0001, in addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, Interest and attorney's fees. SIGNATURE. _______________________ _,... ______ DATE _________ _ tt-z,;_+bw~E8~eu11:;!)~.DEQi;:A'IIAtiorf::~i<::~ --~ ,;"'/t:71::0~t,:::2.,:: ;::~::::::i~ :".:'.Y:f::: .. <t-:·f:/i; :t-.A --~~'.'.:?~·-0:tfi_;:;>i=:::~,:J, ·:~ ';:::...:'.-::s'::_:_r·;; :~: :0\\'. · I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License .Law for the following reason: Q I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their" sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply-to an owner of pr"operty who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold· within one Y!lar of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). -0 I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon; and contracts for such projects with contractor(sl licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). 0 I am exempt under Section ______ Business and'Professions Code for this reason: 1. I ·personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. 0 YES .ONO ·2. I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. 3. I have contracted _with the following person (firm) to provide th!! propoi;lid construction (include-name/ address/ phone number/ contractors license number): 4. I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following-person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone number/ contractors license number): _____ ...,...----------,--------'--------------------------- 5. I will provi_de some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type of work):;...-------'-----------------------.:.....----------------------------- Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely· hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention ,program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? 0 YES O NO l!i the-applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit·from the-air pollution control district or air quality management district? 0 YES O NO Is the. facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? 0 YES ·O NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENT~ OF 'THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION· CONTROL DISTRICT. 1~t;·:r<tQ.t•1ttTfif¢nll'f~.P1NJi~fl'{c~.f'.".:).:~1r::;;~:r~~;;:;:.ft.:rt~f~r:1\:r:::;·:;:-,.:,.,;>~~-x;.t:-~=-:, . ., .. · :.·. :,0·-... _ ., . :;_;, .. _.-, ::· ···-• I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 309.7(i) Civil Code). :1 ·certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ·ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby:-authorize representatives of the Citt of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection p1,1rposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDl:MNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required-for excavations.over 5'0* deep and demolition or-construction of structures over 3 stories in hei!;Jht. EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the Building Official u er the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such r:iermit is not commenced within 5 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended L or abandoned at any ti r the d r a period of 180 days (Section 106.4.4 Uniform Building Code). _ • -'\. APPLICANT'S S NAT . ~~~~~~~~~~~::::::::__..;.________ DATE ,,,,~~~:.,-,-,q.~....:~c...:~:,:._ _____ _ WHITE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance l:sGil Corporation I -, ' 1n Partnersliip witli (jovemment for 'lJuirding Safety DATE: AUG 11, 1998 JURISDICTION: CARLSBAD -/ .. ,~ . PLAN CHECK NO.: 96'-2035 REV.# 3 '(PCR 98'::84) PROJECT ADDRESS: 2091 RUTH~RFORD PROJECT NAME: CARLSBAJ) RESEARCH CENTER SET:I 0 PLAN REVIEWER 0 FILE !Zl The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with thejurisdiction's build_ing codes. · D The pl~ns transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. D ihe check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck . . D ·The applicant's copy of the. check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. . D The applicant's copy of the check_·list has been sent to: [8j Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant_that the plan check has been completed. D Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan Check has been completed. Person contacted: T e.lephone #: Date. contacted: (by: ) Fax#: Mail Telephon(;l Fax In Person [8j REMARKS: Project engineer's response to the special inspector's field questions. By: Ali Sadre Enclosures.: ' ' Esgil Corporation Cl GA D CM. 0 EJ 'O PC 8/4 · trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diegp, California: 92123 + (619) 560-1468 + Fax (619) 560-J VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: CARLSBAD . PREPARED BY: SADRE BUILDING ADDRESS: 2091 RUTHERFORD BUILDING PORTION Bl:Jlbl;;)ING ,~R~A (SE;l~ ft.) · STRUCTURAL 1.5 HRS. .REVISIONS Afr Conditi9ning . Fire§prinklers TOTAL VALUE UBC Building Permit Fee: UBC Plan Check Fee: Comments: PLAN CHECK NO.: 96-203.5 REV (PCR 98-34) DATE: 8/11 BUILDING OCCUPANCY: B/F1/S1 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN VALUATION VALUE MULTIPLIER ($) 87.15/HR. 130.73 ESGIL FE.E .. .. .. $ $ 163.41 CITY FEE Sheet 1 of 1 valuefee.dot ., ,. .,,,,I MEMO I DATE <:,/03 /1 e -1) lln, &s M•SS:wt, ju?J .:s+f5D., (, (5 0-,~ d Z@ pt Ac;), ;;.Patt -fl!#Dtt69P Mme -1' .2) k5 IY£C 5f'•it:C: "tti:\-c :m ~,ig "'i!::\e G,CGe. A:e?w'li '1LM;tsg ON P,•~ , ..L2 * ') f 4) J '" .~ ;,J ..._ • 7 / A ~\ ~ ~ -5) tlr'L. f:C. wc:x Q~ ar,ewG M'°'"5£el A ,:Ji1,:rrf,;J;4tt-'f" S4AT c,,; ~so. (JAif ~""'" ) f/A,,ltJN ~ IN~ AN/!.. .. ~ ,, ti, .we-..::2 11:0. ae. l"M4fc::n..:." !'Un< m tt "'U,r'/4 !!ii1A1 n> kl:!lr'i ~· · / ) z. .,/ Oi e.t l.i.J! 4;,e¥'7'lf,J _ L,,,t;¢;;.S. ~~ ~ :@#16Jt, t-t.l«H /1':; 4€£ cf~ . . c' ) RE-f-To. A-~V6 1/G.M ;z..·) : r 12..~tJIA~l) AT ~Loµ,,,./ 70 IA.I /ADJ..113,Nj ~RAM/f. D1/LY .1 ~ I J:J. (-,..) Ac f· T0 17e.M~ I 70 ~ ·· A-ry-A C*J> ~/i€. T > 1 'To 6. ~ ft4&'1m 1Z' f,qµ., &Ala M ----'-""'-, ·- ' ,'Or.JL..,_,..l...:.w-~ . f I MEMO WYMAN TOTING LAIORATORY (5) l, • .-11'11 t tn,4 I tti3f\ • T--. I suSJECT A-Haw 4'-i. 7'JI¢ ,,,uru,u,4 CA .. ,.en:,12 {j&t11cG, a,nm M(');ds,)~ DATE 5/zuJ1' ,.#.' w ~..41"i04tt1ftll2 wl&U?U/1 72) WJ','(24 ,&rt Ar~· (J/p B.:f/1 • 7 2 , « . -,; wt!!X ls: ; :ro 1,11 <!X 3s: ,,,.,, At: .,,, .· 4 I.P ~ /1..$ • ... ~ (J_}tj//T MIi 1l6( 7)/MLMJl(Jt,{\J a,e ..S'l&P ,M}4L,1JEP t',Sf:82 &w,1. PA ( n, mfi#9 tft-&h ... ·-· -'~~=·:;~ e @ovt.ne ;J11J a('I 72tt1~ °:t zyn at= 4#MMfC7k,lyr esn,.Ju,.; A 1Jlf# ano.-~~. 81') wto/tZZ ~ .«a,~ ~., #-(Jq,4 .([ 4/P E;h a .z.~y. 7'm(L 5,~ 4 1/$r} 'f XC,.SA/td'.r?lofv ht/ ZS, ~,l Nh'4 'JN£7'fill::f. l!T 72il,S '9CHIW, : /~- RETAIN WHITE COPY FOR OUR AU:, !£:NO O YE.LOW, 30 PINK COPY TO CUSTCMEA. 0 NO REPt Y NECESSARY O PLEASE RE?L Y O TELS?HCNE O RETURN ENCl.Oseo MEMO wrT'H RE?l.. Y / KLT ·-N'SULTING S1RUCTURAL ENGINEER;.. 3430 Irvine Avenue . .'.llewport Beach. CA 92660 Tel: (714) 263-1308 Fax: (714) 263-1310 PROJECTCA Rl.5 B~..D. 7<~ 7tEA Rcl/D~TE ---SHEET 7 OF __ SUBJECT LJ 1 4/· ~/ CALC.BY _____ JOB 9 6.0 ,9J.a ' I " ;t --I)- pA-A!e i. -11-lo pAAl~l I:! 4-'/ KLT CONSULTING STRUCTuRAL ENGINEERS 3430 Irvine Avenue. Newport Beach, CA 92660 Tel: (714) 263-1308 Fax: (714) 263-1310 €~ PROJECT __ w_r-t--"~~J _________ ~ ___ DATE 6-z.4,. '18 SHEET V OF __ SUBJECT ---'-,----------,,---------,---CALC. BY _____ JOB 4 (RtJq{: II -------.-------! 1------------- iG::,xsxY12- (LLH) II -L_ ____________ + l .... ! :-?-:.· --------------------· --· -----------------------------------< ~ -----.-LoT 51 7 . 7 .. I/()__ V. 11 I/ II 14 ------fE'~ X 14 X 14 t ©--··- :~ I -. I I • !{fl. ~: -~-1 -' ~ , -~r ff> .---r·····' (. l l _,,,_ __ -,,.,,c______it....--11 I I I I f'-.. I t\1 LL I t I ~ I 1 I I 3 3 u:, PACIFIC COAST IRON CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER BLDG. ~2 LOT 51 COLUMN AT GRID LINE "F" & "2'' (ABOVE 2ND F :...OOR) .. - t C(\ CJ. ~ L__ t.\ ~ ~ -' 'I'" .' KLT CONSULTING S1RUCTURAL ENGINEERS 3430 Irvine Avenue, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Tel: (714) 263°1308 Fax: (714) 263-1310 PROJECT ----------'----------DATE _____ SHEET 4 OF __ susJEcT ~o T-J::i • _f:! I; 8-CiJNC ]>ANcl- CALC.BY _____ JOB f 6 Cl q(/._. W-z f x 4-4- =~~2-1:=--==-=---+-~~ PL AV VI~ w {pAR(IA !.. P.,.oaf p&/tJJ . . KLT CONSULTING smucruRAL ENGINEERS 3430 Irvine Avenue, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Tel: (714) 263-1308 Fax: (714) 263-1310 PROJECT ___ ..,,_k-=-P--1-f-Af-~-I'---_________ ~ DATE e, ... ~4,, 4 e, SHEET ..r-OF -- SUBJECT -------~'---~--------CALC. BY _____ JOB fjfoi?qf j ' ,- I \ PROJECT KLT CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS 3430 Irvine Avenue, Newport Beach. CA 92660 Tel: (714) 263-1308 Fax: (714) 263-1310 f<GSeAecd cw-Lnr 5 'DATE C7,.,:2,~-~8 / SHEET~ 0_ OF __ SUBJECT----------------------------CALC.BY _____ JOB q00':f4 X r j: -~·' . ·.~.: . I . . . . . A V,Er-1 X ·- J.OCi I : . (j( (Jr tt[/<._ f' 0/&:> /(YJ r f~/~(qb 1:·::{~:::~:;::G/ t lo I ?-J /1 i -~ v/v\_ IJ .,__, -~·--·-··· .__, Cflo ~~d;--04 (K},J!. tJ.kJ.i:1./J,L .. 'S.0-(' APPROVALS ~ I o/JJ{/9t-r~ Ci#[ ~ ~Date . . BuDdlna ,_--J !.., :1 I l --,-., ..__ · q. °?6. Planni / /1-s / 'i<, C) '--" vc'-.IL -\o u,: l c. c \.-.j :0\--..~ f [ ....._ , c'::':S . '\c"-<. ~ 'I, f 0-,,. 10/t:z/i~~ l-· 7411/'l!. )'.J;)\1\'j[, Fire ~1 rtz -z O t t (p c. lq ----Coastal , · t, ---H Ith : ~(1--~f(1-~l,_,~ fG ~x:r~-(~ -P{<w v.{ f,,~ , .. L-~ 1 1 'd{1-q{'n-WL R. 1>Aw'1,:L to t, ... .Jw~ °-* ~l. eKfv~. _ 1, p;irv · : [ -er 1..{'{1 -c o&_ls '(J ~ k,l\ c...st,,../4= fo JN.,_ of-_P-c. ~·r~ . . 'rt!~½ c .. ,-,- ' [ c//r/r?-fr..cd/ ~ ~ f4 Pl: ~ fll'ff~/YNefp,,JJ 67 1aQfj17 H"-l<-J, -; 9/'WJ/91-/#FU A ~--~ .qy!-. DA'!. /"-lk i t u(-u{ en~ ,; a,,;,(.L +-"'"" 1 c..,vu; ll.r :;;==~t:::=-:: ::k"!:. ~:---. ; I ( ' ' ' ·,, j -''-".i7 ·ieiioci;;FEE~' -; /() 'l_,[ ~ / /,\;, C j • , , liQll«ioR" -HAZM~ , . ;. r , ~ ...,__,,,_,.~~-ENGRBCORR --~ FORM ; --+--UUC . j 9/18/14 Ko/I UJ~yf Jr0vtti)-;_,, t-~f 1/cUIF rllA«f = · -'!~ ,, J. I c{ / • J. L {)II DL< • A , I I I n ~v'\. ~ --,ESSOR PLANS , . ,-l,1'(!fllA,lt> 5J+v i(tW"' l'-' f VV\,~~ ----i--C OFO : .:-v(JM Z"l h c,/4 . !\Jo-I+~ eJ -A N t; ~hi /'f wr! , ··, ,Ll..JJ1+io~ p.u~~" 1Gr 1'~ lrsp-e.c. . , .(,\:__ f£A Q'l,,--,c s,.,..:.+c..tub ap•":Lir ~ ~pP/Mtr,1tfi'/Jo/ ,. ··::,·~'.;:··t·: ~T .· --·--7":·~--. -:· .;~~~~~~~7zr------·rc--,...,~--.,.----..,-----·-~----~---- ' - ,,-{ \, ~JMP : L, l =RNS, :::t COFO -----·-· ----, ••. <r1 . ~ \ \ ·~.r..-L----,..;,,.., ____ ' ' ,. '· ' ,. ,·· ' I I. , .. ' ' ' .. ' l ~ i : . f·. [.' I ' I '. i '. f I ,. I. ' ' ' '· i i,. I •; :. I '·· ' i' ' ' .. [,:. + i! • " .. ,, --·· ·. . . . © 1998 O'Day Consultants, Inc. . . '~ -... ELEVATIONS ARE FROM FIELD SURVEYS CONDUCTED ON OCTOBER 22, 1998 & OCTOBER 26, 1998 I 8 2~-;o I " I .;-+• ,;,1:~!lt ; + ~ J· ~ ' 8 " ii + g " • " • ~ " ,f ~~ ~ ~".> o· 10' 5' 20' SCALE: 1' = 1 O' ! ~ i N " • + ~ I $'~ Q•as N + + ~ + + N ... + + N N ~ + * ~ • ~ + I • ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ • • i • • •• + ~ J • N " " ~ ~ i ~ ~ • • ~ ~ I HANDICAP ·ACCESS. PLAN SCAL[• f • = !O' . . -, -.·' ' ~-_,_ ~ • • ~ ~ ' i J ~ :: 1 " • • ~ • "! I! ; + N ~ N • ':l. :: ~ • .. ,f ,l 'I-, ~ • oo·,;g '+ ! ~ ~,, 1'$:·,P? • "' 8• N ; • + N [ :, ~ ,. ~ ~ ,;!' • ~ ,,,. ~ t, ~ e ,'I " • " N ~ • • ~ "' • " . ' . .-,_ . ·,i ' . ' + • • ~ • • ; " ~ • " ~ • 0 ~ • • " ~ g • " ~ • " " • i +~ <l-"'" .., . + •• " ..-..:.'¼'f, ~-' ~ 8 g • N + + + ~ N N • ~ • ~ ;; a N • s s N .. • • • ~ • ~ N ~ + ..... N ~ N i ~ ~ • ~·"t,, 0 ~.,_.,, ~ + N • ~ + ~ 'l~,.oe • . .. • ~. +~ + ~-f N • .,, • + ~ ; N """ ~ + ~ ., t! " • I 8 " • • + N N ~ • ~ " ::: N • " 2 N ~ " <iP.,., • ~ ~ • i '"> • ~ ,. . ' • r ,, , .. , . ' ... -~· ·,_·--,·,: - :..._,. + " ~ • + ~ • f + + + + J ; ~ f + i! N f • • +~ ~~ •• •• ~ + s . _;,<c_ .. - + ii a + 2'1J.73 ; " • --' . • + ~ + 5900 Pasteur Court Suite 100 Corlsbod. Colifornio 92008., 760-931-7700 Far. 760-9Jl~8680 . ·. " -,,~ ' .. . ', . ~ • • • t! g + " • " ~ ~ g .-... ·, . ,, ·~ + + !! • • Civil Engineering Planning Processing Surveying- + ~ ~ ' ., O'DAY CONSULTANTS AUG 16 1999 DATE PRINTED DESIGNED BY: _,,K.,,,H~. __ DATE: OCTOBER 1998 DRAWN BY: ------'-'-SCALE: .1" = 10' PROJECT MGR.: G,0. JOB NO.: 98.:.1037 ENGINEER OF WORK: CiATE; GEORGE O'DAY .·RCE: fi\JDBS\981037'\ADAO .. ,: ' :'>-. ·' .j .i I i I i j ' I ,'j ., l . ' ! ' . ' l ·' ! ' ) i. ji . : ' . ' ! ·. 11 1, ' I I' J ' I ' I .! l -1 .i . .• I. ' \ -.. ' • • ' ; . I I. i .-: .~· I I ' ' '. ,. ' . L ' i I i/ •. · , .. , r . I I , -'~ ', f< ! .. '·. < I • ,· -. I f ·, t-'. v-:, ___ _ (. t. ' ['...., f,. . ... t: f--. [r' • ,:; . : ,_. ..... , .-•,.,:' . ' ----------------- MATCH EXIST/NC GROUND © 1998 · O'Dof. Consultants, Inc. ·· 11;;; \ •i '::, .. ,.-.,, ·d:•:,,..-• VARY SLOP£ 2% -2:1 r---==--...l...,LJ 6' CURB VARY SLOP£ --------2% [l==::--::-::-~-~--~-~-;-; __ ;::::==t:r~~;2:~~-~2·~1-I --\==~ MATCH EXISTING GROUND ----------- SECTION A-A NO SCALE O' 10' 5' SCALE: 1" = 10' EXISTING PIN£ TR££ Lor 51 20' \ S[[ DETAIL B ,,-,-.... ABOVE R£/.IOl1: PORTION OF MOW STRIP & REPLACE PER LANDSCAPE ARCH! TfC T'S RECOMM£NDA TION NO TE: ltH[RE TREE ROOTS INTERFERE YtfTH SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION, CUT ROOTS &-INSTALL ROOT BARRIERS HANDICAP ACCESS· PLAN SCALE· f' = ID' . . . ,. ,, ---------- MATCH EXISTING AC PAVEMENT RUTHERFORD ROAD --- --------------, _, I --I I DUST/NC AC PA 'vfM£NT ---------------\ I I \ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SAi/CUT LIN£ I MATCH EXISTING ,' I I C R£MO'vf ~'REPLACE / .----EXIST/NC AC PA VEM[NT I I I I I I I I I I I 5' 5' 5' I I I EXISTING CURB &-:cuTTER : \,--__ J_-l--'-~!!4~t---L~-2~6iil4~. 7'],t 6J---l-------\\ I \ '~------1-----,,------+·------ir----.--~' REMOVE &-REPLACE EXISTING CURB &-CUTTER EXIST/NC CURB &-CUTTER ;--._.:,.. REMOVE & REPLACE 5' ------------- EXISTING .CURB & CUTTER 6' CURB '----C DETAIL B NO SCALE EXIST/NC GROUND~-------------------------. r-------------------- EXIST/NC CUTTER ---------------------- N[WCUTTER (j 5% MAX -.;:.._i-,,k_ 1/2' LIP MODIFIED DEPRESSED CURB & Clf Tl[R SECTION C-C NO SCALE 5900 Pasteur Court S1,1lte-100 Carlsbad, Co!ifornic 92008 760-931-7700 F'ox: 760-9:51-8680 Civif Engineering Ptonning Processing . Surveying FINISHED GRAD£ O'DAY CONSULTANTS AUG 161999 ·. DATE PRINTl;D. DESIGNED BY: K.H. DATE: OCTOBER 1998 DRAWN BY: -----SCALE:. 1· " 10' PROJECT MGR: G.0. JOB NO,: 98-1037 ENGINEER OF WORK: GEORGE O'OAY · DATE: · ·· ' ; ' . ,;_·' ..... . ,-,; -~: '·..: . _,-~ ,._ .- ' ' .. i ' ·1 •' ' .; ' . :• ··: j J , -l •I Cl ,.1 ·. J ·I • ;i . ' , -. } --~ ·.~ ' ·-~-~-i - I •' •; 'i