The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2100 COSTA DEL MAR RD; ; 84-514-B; PermitDECLARATIONS LENDER WORKERS COMPENSATION OWNER/BUILDER CONTRACTOi i ae sl !i»g:? -r l3 Hi! lii ! - °-re < ^ Or~^T3 m°CO55-ss^i1 a5§lls|sip-_=s-5^s;i^icg •< „. co co pursuaawof Iefrion ol S'53 Bll~§E M&|I "iaIS||^as = -si."^"1 -S<i?ll°=s3 ~ ^ &^ ^^ -~* s w ° =,~ — °3s°— E?-< .~-,ss "lfal=°S?"L, =rr,_ -. ^J- g» o c 1a °35^oiS- = = 5 -as ?J a^u-5 ™ =5 * 3 ^Sffi'^llilsf he following rCode Any cittruct alter imto its issuance alMe a signed stprovisions ofommencing witnd Professiois for the allby an applicpenalty ofllegicaot[nBrv|flII|s*lf iHl^lllili ^ecty wemouirest thContionor ihptiperran liontrac7031 5hicn relish or'he apat he isractor s7000 ofat is exAnysunt " — v ' 1 STRUCTION, WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT 1 AL1 KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LI 1 EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST S1 1 GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT1 \ N1 i a i 3 C2fT | L O N X^ • •«JO AGHkt 10 SAVb INUbMNIt-Y ANU •__.._...-.„ -.-.,aTIIDC „ IUX "JfcABILITIES JUDGMENTS COSTS AND AP^JCANT S SIGNATURE *• OWNER?? CONTRACTOR^AID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE >&S — "^S^ / {2j£?jeSS „„„,,„ ^ r^no 5s-1 i HAVE; CAREFULLY EXAMINED THF COMPLETED APPLICATION AND PERMIT1 I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT ALL INFORMATION HEREON1 1 DECLARATIONS ARE TRUE AND CORRECT AND 1 FURTHFR CERTIFY AND AGR1 | ISSUED TO COMPLY WITH ALL CITY COUNTY AND STATE LAWS GOVERNINO mm = >OJ — Z 7_c -n 00f: >ca° -c O Oz m z m ° ~ H m 2 c/: m -< B )n Every permit issued by the Buitding Official underexptre by limitation and become null and void l*by such permit is not commenced within 180 daysif the building or work authorized by such perI at any time after the work is commenced for a pe!"* 3 * »srovisionsof tnis3utldmg or workthe date o' suchs suspended or tof 180 days frtJT* AN OSHA PERMIT5 0 DEEP AND DESTRUCTURES OVES REQUIRED FOR EXCAVATIONS OVEMCXJTION OR CONSTRUCTION QFR 3 STORIES IN HEIGHTX IO Ho o ID •TOTAL FEES PAYABLE*^^^^^T1'!^ ,J^ ^^^. r* \CREDIT DEPOSIT0/LJ ^^^Tjt/-^\~ \TEMP OCCUjJAlfCY (30 DAYS)5-n Tl 00o COro01 1<0 X & 3 \ C m 33 '-Oc:0 C/)\LICENSE TAX 01 00 00 8162 ^TEMP POLL 2DU AMP^X^JDm O m X "DTl O o "Tl oo § JDro O CD X X cr S.SanDieguito 8092230519EXIST BLDG EA AMP/SWKBKR /ROCK STORAGEm 0 COCD COro ro O T) X -a X — '\O —1 '.r. o 1"a. COCD CD ro 0en CD rr. 0 m T) GO o1 — rn0— \ C/ enCD 0CD mm O CO— iDO O— H O—1 ELECTRICAL PERMIH CD Cm \ D SOLAR ISSUECD OCDm "Tlmm •1 \ ~DcrCD O O 1 1 COCOa 1 -c cr 5 1 \TOTAL MECHANICAL-n ID en "0 m 5 h CD OCDe COroro STRONG MOTION 80 92 33 0519f T l 33 Hi•'.n \ enO 01 30 31 b k > m ZO RELOCAJ^cTfj OF EA FURNACE/HEATERMOBILEHOME PARK INSPEACH VACUUM BR^A^TfiZmn X m X X LC X 0o dc: —iC/l oCD I— ^O m CD O CD 00 INDr>oCJ1 m r:X C/3 j— m rn m VENT FAN SlNGLE^tftjTMEGHAN0 1 — CD 0CD O0 CDno ji.EACH GAS SYSTEM b OR MORE ^^§ "E* 2 I m |ELECTRICAL 01 00 00 8223EACH GAS SYSTEM 1 TO <! OUTLETS ^^ '.BOILER/COMPRESSOR 3 15 HP/^TOTAL PLUMBING 01 00 00 8222EACH WATER HEATER AND/OR VENT ^/"BOILER/COMPRESSOR UP TO 3 HP ^ — 'm09i?I$ 1 EACH BUILDING SEWERo m 3D oo 00CD O3— (SIGN PERMIT ^" ^ . 01 °° °° 8221- m OX X m —1 33 •o INSTALL FURN UUCTS uP TO 100 000 BTU00 a en-om 33 n Ui1 0 £i \ 0H jPLUMBO Tlm 3 H C/) Crn ^ §MECHANICAL PERMIT ISSUE1 SUMMARY/ACCOUNT NUMBERomz</•. ~" j 3) TJ Z O C m PARKING SPACbRES UNITSGRADING PERMIT IfYD N awc 0 REDEVELOPMENTAREA-a NDTYPECONSTOCC LOAD< I D * 7. <n D 5 >( -.* rv L_) ' ^ c f ' t J i a ^ D ru mr-m W— t 20m C/5 O On 0 mOc *==^ i o \ I > •f \ ^*- r*1 1 3 [•DESCRIPTION OF WORK // _ 1J /n AT£>*%o3?£-/ ^DESIGNER S ADDRESS1 DESIGNERS PHONE_d/Ufa/Hh/4/^ W,!-)n|>;.iUUJ|H/^H ci/Ufi/ f)fi HiB/^'oH!'Not Valid Unless Machine Certifiedhi^^i ^ i^« ^ ^V 01 ^> f ^V r~ fjo^ii\3 o ^^ QN °xi x ^^ m ^»A ^™* N I 1 LICENSE »STANDARD PLAN #BUILDING SO FOOTAGEvsS ^ S* z g ^ i OWNER S PHONE7SB- //£/CONTRACTOR S ADDRESS£#?/ A&ZTJAC. &&±~j LICENSE NOb? ^^?75T3r z D * 03r 8 CV)m n Oam rg s bn SUBDIVISIONASSESSOR PARCEL NO"*r nfPi ov z "N 3S s S 5 *s -30 < 5 33fti> fc CONTRACTORS PHONE »yL32-£0441 \1 ^OB ADDRESS AV STRD NEAREST CROSS ST: ZiOO Cs&Trf -Zfez A^e Kc&i?DATE OF APPLICATIONe-fr-86^\ •^ a. K "\ ' T>> m V 3 -~- Z ^ 5 \ CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION & PEP. 1200 Elm Carlsbad California 92008 1989 (619)4385525^H C/9 •oO -H •om 0 •o rri Z 0 •o r-CANT TO F'ILL IN INFORMATION WITHIN SHADED AREA AND DECLARATIONSWhite — Inspector Green — (1) Finance (2) Data Process, Yellow — Assessor Pmk — Applicant Gold — Temporary File SPECIAL CONDITIONSBUILDINGO CO V MECHANICALx ELECTRICALx PLUMBINGx TJ 1- ''•CALL FOR FINAL INSPlITEMS ABOVE^ ' 1 1 <ytn.Q m--nr* 2m "^3^0 J^31 r- 33 0 -D31 t. Xs' -VENTILATING SYSTEMS~: ^ •HEAT — AIR COND SYSTEMSD O o m n 33m-n u 2 ^ w , • \-^J "V ^MECHAN&ALk y;D BONDING D POQL..D ELECTRIC SERVICE D TE< Z 3)ROUGH ELECTRICA\ J(D ELECTRIC UNDERGROUNDn -n Tlm JU ELECTRICALD WATER HEATER D SOLAFm Tl ^> O CO Hm CO 0 £ 1 ^ VJ \ \.rC TUB AND SHOWER PAN•^k O T3 Oc n § m u m 33 UNDERGROUND D WASTED ^_ Hm JD J^•^f* COm m3J >zo CD O O D TJ So PLUMBINGINTERIOR LATH & DRYWALLs >J £• "INSULATION\^^*EXTERIOR LATH•*i FRAME•T"<^«SHEATHING D ROOF CCOIm 3) v^X FLOOR & CEILING SUB FRAMin GUNITE OR GROUTMASONRYREINFORCED STEEL•^sc **•FOUNDATION( ^> ^*x^BUILDINGfc TJm •^ Hm 7COTJm | \ UN \ \^j^ i .'-f . O ' • - - - y/j I _-< ^^* ^ > • ,c ^^ 'S~ 7\-£''I**? fK? V f J K -" **•'' "' . ^ ~~~~~ ^ ' '* •' - r i ' t , - ^- x> x C/j O '7. O i SPECIAL MASONRYi HIGH STRENGTHBOLTSFIELD WELDINGPOST TENSIONEDCONCRETEV " >• ;PRESTRESSEDCONCRETE1 STRUCTURAL CONCREOVER 2000 PSIrn SOILS COMPLIANCEPRIOR TOFOUNDATION INSPi | ! i "' ^ j ^INSPECTIONO133m mOO m TIa _> z ^^^oo _^ >° in D -im ,| REQUIRED in TlmO ( — Z CO TJmO 6 ^in Z Tl O on zoJ min -n m D Zin Tlma Hoz um OuO ESGIL CORPORATION 932O CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 2O8 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) 56O-1468 DATE:25 /??£' JURISDICTION; PLAN CHECK NO; 84-£?/4- - -ZET PROJECT ADDRESS: D APPLICANT D JURISDICTION d PLAN CHECKER D FILE COPY D UPS D DESIGNER The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. f~] The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes, when minor deficien- cies identified on the enclosed check list are resolved and checked by building department staff. [~] The plans transmitted herewith have major deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. (_l The check list transmitted herewith is the jurisdiction's copy for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corp. 'until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. |~~| The applicants copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to return to the applicant contact person. (| The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: ( Esgil staff did not advise the applicant contact person that plan check has been completed. I I Esgil staff did advise applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: _ Date contacted:Telephone # REMARKS:V<, BY:ENCL ESGIL CORPORATTONATK Form 31584 ESGIL CORPORATION 932O CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 2O8 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) 56O-1468 January 25, 1985 Mr. Carter Darnell Building Inspection 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 Subject: Building Permit For LaCosta North Phase The enclosed 84-514-111 plan sets are adequate to allow issuance of the building permit for the phase. We have concentrated on the building code aspect to allow structural work to proceed on this phase. The plans for Mechanical, Plumbing, Energy and Electrical are included in only the Owner III set, but are not sufficiently complete to allow construction of those elements; they are enclosed only for information purposes at the jobsite. The City III set does not have Plumbing, Electrical, Mechanical or Energy as we will be working with the various designers to get those items complete and approved. You should advise the inspectors that the structural and foundation plans in the 84-514 Owner III and City III sets supercede the plans that were used at the time the foundation only permit was issued. If you have any questions, please call Jim or Gene. Jim\ Gilshian Vic© President cc: Irv Roston Les Vaughn Mike Smith - John Carson Kiev Phan dtp of Cartefcafc TO; John S. Carson Q^P-PLICANT COPY WZMH Group Inc. 0CITY COPY 1500 Quail Street CARLSBAD. CALIFORNIA 92008 D PLAN CHECKER COPY Newport Beach, CA 92660 CC: Johnson & Nielsen COMMERCIAL PLAN CORRECTION SHEET A. Plan Check Number 84-514 B. Site Address La Costa Clubhouse Irvine, CA 92715 (Phase I-North) C. Owner La Costa D. Building Code Applicable 1979 U.B.C. E. Occupant Load See 5 F. Occupancy See 5 G. Type of Construction See 7 H. Allowable Floor Area See 7 Stories See 6 Use See 5 Sprinklers: (Yes) No Actual See 7 I. Basis for Area Increase Prior to resubmittal, IJ. Remarks, deposit of $3,045.57 . Date Plans Submitted Wed. 9/26/84 Date Initial Plan Check Completed Fri please pay the Bldg. Dept a Plan Check Date Plans to Plan Checker Wed. 9/26/84 . 10/12/84By Jim G. & Gene M. Applicant Contact Person John Carson Tel.(714) 851-1494 FOREWORD; PLEASE READ 1. This plan check is limited to technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the handicapped. The plan check is based on regulations enforced by the Building Inspection Department. 2. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. For information regarding those departments, please contact Mr. Carter Darnell at (714) 438-5525. 3. The items below need clarification, modification or change. All items have to be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 303 (c), 1979 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. 4. Please submit two sets of corrected plans and show on this list where corrections were made i.e. sheet, detail, etc..Return any original plans and documents that were returned to you by the city. The above items may be returned to the City Building Department or to Esgil Corporation at 9320 Chesapeake Dr., Suite San Diego, CA 92123, telephone (714) 560-1468. 8/19/82 City of Carlsbad Plan Check No. 84-514 October 16, 1984 The total area of this phase, is 16,824 at cart storage level, 13,354 at the retail level area and 16,081 at the entertainment level. The cart storage level will be B-2 after some clarification of the battery charging activity. The Member's Club on that level is an A-3 occupancy. The retail level is all B-2. The entertain- ment level is considered to be an A-2.1. Occupant load for the cart storage level is 100 in the A-3 Members room 32 in the retail sales and 41 in the remaining area of this level. Occupant load for the retail level is 133. Occupant load for the entertainment level is 961. Total occupant load for this phase is roughly 1,267. Portions of this phase may be 3 story and data should be presented to show whether the entertainment level is on the third floor or second floor. A/A41, shows three stories between grid line 1A and to the left of grid line Z. B, on A4.2 also indicates 3 stories. See the attached 'Interpretations Manual' excerpt. If the building is III-lhr. and sprinklers have been used for overall area increases for the entire building, then the sprinklers could not be used to allow an additional story for an A2.1 occupancy. Table 5-D restricts A2.1 occupancies, in type III-lhour construction, to two stories; Please clarify. The expansion of the club- house to the east may have changed the cart storage level to a story, rather than a basement. The total area of the entire clubhouse, existing and additions will approximate 184,202 square feet. Table 5-C allows a basic area of 18,000 square feet for B-2 with Type III-l hour construction. If 100% increase were allowable for yards, the basic area would double to 36,000. If sprinklers are used for area increase, then the 36,000 would double to 72,000. Per Section 505(b), the72,000 could be doubled to!44,000 for multi- story. Carlsbad Plan Check No.84-514 October 16, 1984 Clarify on the title sheet, the type of construction you intend to use and the basis for concluding that type of construction is within the allowable area. Identify by direction and dimension the permanent yards and clarify whether sprinklers will be used for area increases. Section 505(c) allows areas of base- ments to be excluded from the area calculations, so long as the basement areas do not exceed the allowable area for a one story building and does not qualify as a story. 8. We consider the upper level entertainment area to be one room with 961 occupants. Total area is 16,108 square feet from which we subtracted 573 square feet for the men's room, 781 square feet for the women's room and 340 square feet for the service bar to give 14,414 square feet net for which we used 15 square feet per occupant. If one used 30 square feet per occupant, it would still have 480 occupants and be an A2.1. the data should be shown on the building data sheet. 9. Note room capacity signs shall be posted in accordance with Section 3301(3), for the A2.1 occupancy. 10. The area bounded roughly by Z to ZC and F - to D, has about 2,065 square feet or 138 occupants at 15 square feet per occupant. The 'Room1 would require two complying exits per Table 33-A. The exits should be spaced a distance apart at least equal to 1/2 the maximum diagonal of the area served. It appears you need an exit on the North side. 11. The overall area of the A2.1, with 961 occupants, requires at least three complying exits (Sec.3302(a)). The exits shall be '...arranged a reasonable distance apart so that is one becomes blocked, the others will be available...', the primary exit to the main entrance lobby is thru the 'Lobby Lounge1 and'Lobby1 rooms. Carlsbad Plan Check No. 84-514 October 16, 1984 The main staircase exit from the lobby seems to be questionable for use if a fire occurred in the grid 3-5 and B-C.2 area. The only remaining exit would be the campanile stair tower at the extreme northwest corner of the entertainment level. This comment, would support the conclusion that an additional exit is needed in the grid Zc and DE area or the grid 1 and F area. 12. Section 3303(b) requires total exit width to be at least equal to the occupant load divided by 50 and such width of exits shall be divided approximately equally among the separate exits. The 961 occupants requires 961/50 or 19.2 feet of exit width. The 19.2 feet required width, if distributed approximately equally, would have a 3 exits each 6 feet wide . Although the code says "approximately1, it would not seem reasonable to have less that 6' at each exit unless more than the 3 exits were provided i.e. 4 at 5' each, 7 at 3' each, etc. It should be noted that the actual exit width to the existing bridge is 6' wide. 13. The stair tower, depending on the number and width of other complying exits, should have a width equal to the number of occupants served divided by 50 i.e. if it were one of 3 equal sized exits serving the A2.1 then the width would have to be 19.2/3 or 6.4 feet. The maximum exit width required shall be maintained and the exit includes the stairway (Sec. 3302(b). 14. Table 5-B requires a one hour occupancy separation between a B-2 and the A2.1 entertainment level. Show how the separation is achieved at the main entrance corridor, grid 6-7 and B-C and the retail area at the lower level. There appears to be common atmosphere between the A2.1 and the B-2 below and the remainder of the building to the South. Carlsbad Plan Check No. 84-514 October 16, 1984 15. Clarify that corridors serving 30 or more comply with Section 3304 (h), regarding doors, glazing and wall construction. 16. The large stairway, grid 3-6 and C.4 - E appears to connect the floor at elevation 47.86 at the Members Club with the floor at elevation 54.8 at the retail level and the floor at the top lobby level at 58.63. The stairway also connects with corridors. Section 3308(a) requires interior stairways to be enclosed in a one hour enclosure, when connecting more than two floor levels or if connecting just two levels that in turn connect to corridors. Clarify how you will comply. 17. The "storage1 area you show on the retail level, should be labeled 'NON-USABLE void space as exits are required from1...every building or usable portions thereof... (Sec.302). The code is silent on minimum ceiling height for usable void spaces but does require an exit door, having a minimum size 3'x 6'-8, be installed. The code publishing body has interpreted the above to require a minimum ceiling height of 6 feet 8 inches in usable spaces to provide a minimum height exit path to the minimum height exit door. (There are some specific exceptions regarding minimum ceiling height but they are not pertinent to this situation.) 18. Table 17-A, requires a 1 hour roof/ceiling system for Type III-l hour construction. Clarify the 'Wood Trusses' achieve the 1 hr. rating, at grid 1-5 and B-C. Ditto the GLU-LAMS. Show Details. 19. Clarify the 'battery charging operation! Are all the carts electric and are the batteries charged elsewhere and then placed in the carts or are the batteries charged in the cart area. Needs clarification on the plans. Carlsbad Plan Check No. 84-514 October 16, 1984 20. Clarify that openings in shafts penetrating two floors are protected per Table 17-A. The shaft with the Dumbwaiter and the Grand Staircase. There may be others used for mechanical ducting, etc. 21. Provide details of the stairtower to show it is non- combustible, per Sec.3305 (n) 22. Provide more detail on the 'stage' area to confirm it is not a stage or an enclosed platform. 23. Clarify you have a one hour separation between the A-3, Members Club, and the B-2 area. 24. Show that the 'Porte Cochere' complies with Type III-l hr. construction. 25. Clarify that stair tower has minimum tread of 6inches and at least 9 incheaat a point 12 inch from the side. 26. Fire-resistive exterior wall construction shall be maintained through attic areas. Sec. 4304(c)). 27. Penetrations in occupancy separation walls shall be fire-stopped with an approved material (Sec.4304(e)). 28. Occupancy separation wall penetrations must be either ferrous or copper and fire-stopped. Steel electrical outlet boxes, not exceeding 16 square inches in area, or 100 square inches per 100 square feet of wall, may be installed and shall be separated by a horizontal distance of 24 inches when on opposite sides of a wall. (Sec. 4304(e)). 29. Horizontal occupancy separation fire-resistive floors shall have openings for mechanical and electrical equipment enclosed as per shafts per Sec. 1706. Occasional pipes, conduits sleeves and electrical outlets of copper, sheet steel or ferrous construction maybe installed within or through fire-resistive floor systems if the items do not unduly impair the fire-resistance of the assembly. Roofs may have the same openings as floors and may contain skylights. (Sec. 4305(b) (c) and Chapter 34) . Carlsbad Plan Check No. 84-514 October 16, 1984 30. Clarify that wiring within concealed spaces complies with Sec. 4305 (e). 31. Ducts penetrating one or two-hour occupancy separation walls must have fire dampers. 32. Show that all elements of the fire rated building comply with the required fire resistive construction shown in Table 17-A, including Table 17-A footnote 1 (Table 17-A, Sec. 1702). 33. Show the Item number in Tables 43-A, Gypsum Manual, U.L. etc., that you are using to realize one-hour construction for structural elements (beams and columns) that are not enclosed within a fire resistive assembly (Table 43-A). 34. In fire rated construction, where a ceiling forms the protective membrane for fire resistive protection of a horizontal structure beam, the beam must be individually protected if it supports loads from more than one floor or roof (Sec. 4303 (b) 6). 35. In fire rated construction, trusses must be protected per Sec. 4303 (b) 8. 36. Individual electrical boxes, in rated ceiling, shall be steel and not greater than 16 feet in area (Sec. 43-3 (b) 6). 37. Combustible members framed into a fire resistive wall shall be protected at their ends by at least one-half of the required fire thickness of such wall (Sec. 4304 (b). 38. Note that penetrations in walls requiring protected openings, shall be fire stopped with an approved material meeting the requirements of U.B.C. Standard 43-1 (Sec. 4304 (e)). Carlsbad Plan Check No.84-514 October 16, 1984 39. DELETED 40. Clarify that the fire door hardware complies with 4306 (f). 41. Glazing in the rated fire door or window exceeds the allowable (Sec. 4306 (g), (h). 42. The glazing you show in the rated assembly does not comply with Sec. 4306(i). 43. Fire dampers are required where ducts penetrate the rated assembly. (Sec. 4306 (]) ). 44. DELETED 45. Show details of shaft construction where shafts are required to be protected per Table 17-A and Sec. 1706. 46. Regardless of occupant load, a floor or landing not more than 1/2 inch below the threshold is required on each side of an exit door. 47. Structural beams and columns in stairways in fire- resistive construction, not part of a stairway enclosure, must comply with Table 17-A and Sec. 1702. 48. Stairvays trim and handrails should not project more than 3 1/2 inches into the required width. (Sec. 3306 (b) ). 49. The handgrip portion of all handrails shall be not less than 1 1/4 nor more than 2 inches in cross-sectional dimension. Handrails projecting from walls shall have at least 1 1/2 inches between the wall and the handrail. (Sec. 3306(3)). Carlsbad Plan Check No. 84-514 October 16, 1984 50. Every stairway landing shall have a dimension measured in the direction of travel, at least equal to the stair- way width. (Sec. 3306(g)). 51. One-hour fire-rated corridors shall have door openings protected by tight-fitting smoke draft control assemblies rated 20 minutes, except openings in interior walls of exterior exit balconies. Doors shall be maintained self- closing or be automatic-closing by action of a smoke detector per Sec. 4306(b), doors shall be gasketed to provide a smoke and draft seal where the door meets the stop on sides and tip. (Sec. 3305(h)). 52. Total area of all openings in any portion of an interior corridor, not an exterior exit balcony, shall not exceed 25 percent of the area of the corridor wall of the room which it is separating from the corridor. (Sec. 3305 (h)). 53. Duct penetrations of fire-rated corridor walls and ceilings shall comply with Sec. 4306. (Sec. 3305(h)). 54. Viewports in 20-minute rated corridor doors cannot exceed 1 inch in diameter and must have 1/4 inch thick glass and metal holder that will not melt at 1700°F. (Sec. 3305 (h)). 55. Provide a complete architectural section of the corridor, and exterior exit balcony, showing all fire- resistive materials and details of construction for all floors walls, roof and related and all penetrations. (Sec. 302(a)). 56. Ceilings of non-combustible materials can be suspended below the corridor ceiling only if the corridor ceiling is fire-resistive. (Sec. 3305 (g)). 57. Corridor walls may terminate at theceiling only if the ceiling is an element of a one-hour fire-resistive floor or roof system. (Sec. 3305(g)). Carlsbad Plan Check No. 84-514 October 16, 1984 58. Exit signs are required as the occupant load served by the exit exceeds 50. (Sec. 3314(a)). 59. Show the exits are lighted with at least one foot candle at floor level. (Sec. 3313 (a)). 60. Show the power supply for exit illumination is provided by two separate circuits as the occupant load exceeds: 100/R-l; 100/H; 50/1; 300/any other. (Sec. 3313(b)). 61. Detail beam to column connections. 62. Submit complete structural plans and all details pertinent to the construction. 63. Live load reduction is not permitted for assembly area live loading, e.g. beam B-3, sheet 8 of calculations. 64. Provide complete horizontal force analysis for this phase and for the main building as necessary to evaluate this phase. Show how forces are determined and where and how they are resisted. The analysis should include all aspects of the lateral design, and all design assumptions. 65. No key plan, indentifying beam designations used in calculations, has been provided for retail level framing nor for beams in upper level framing identified in calculations as B-l, B-2, etc. (Calc. Sheets 1-15). Please provide a key plan. 66. Provide the truss calculations for this particular project. 67. Show appropriate bearing and post supports for trusses. 68. Clarify how trusses transfer load to top plate or other shear transfer member. 69. Show glazmg will comply with Chapter 54, 1982, U.B.C., Adopted by State of California. Carlsbad Plan Check No. 84-514 October 16, 1984 70. Note on the foundation plan that Prior to the Contractor requesting a Building Department foundation inspection the soils engineer shall advise the Building Official in writing that: 1. the building pad was prepared in accor- dance with the soils report: 2. the utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and: 3. the foundation excavations, forming and reinforcement comply with the soils report and approved plan. 71. Show access to any concealed attic spaces. 72. Submit complete electrical plans and specifications. 73. Submit complete one-line diagram of service and feeders; show conduit and wire sizes; specify aluminum or copper conductors and type of insulation. Indicate sizes of fuses and/or circuit breakers. 74. Submit electrical load calculations and/or panel schedules. 75. Indicate ampere interrupting capacities (AIC) of service and sub service equipment. NEC 230-98/110-9. 76. Add note to plans indicating: a. All package A/C units shall be labeled by a recognized electrical testing agency. b. All light fixtures installed in suspended ceilings shall be secured to the main and/or cross runners with seismic clips unless installed in accordance with other approved engineering. c. All circuit breaker switched 120 VAC light circuits, must use only type SWD circuit breakers. NEC-110-3b 77. Indicate (a) existing building load, (b) added building load per Item 3, and (c) Items 2 & 4 when new service is required. 78. Indicate (a) existing building load (b) added building load per Item 74 and (c) size of existing service when new service is not required. 79. All conductors within a building section allocated to a service must have a disconnecting means located at that service. S.D. NL 7-30-2. Carlsbad Plan Check No. 84-514 October 16, 1984 80. Submit complete plumbing and mechanical plans. 81. The submitted plans are dated after September 15, 1984 and the construction is subject to compliance with the additional handicapped accessibility regulations that were effective September 15, 1984. Review Title 24 and show compliance with all handicapped accessibility provisions pertinent to this construction. You have different elevations throughout the entertainment center and the different atmosphers would have to be accessible, as would the stage. The handicapped accessibility regulations will no doubt result in additional corrections after your plans have addressed the more obvious items. 82. Provide energy calculations to show compliance with State Energy Conservation Regulations. NOTE: This plan check is not a complete check and is intended to assist you in your determining whether you wish to proceed at your risk with the foundation work prior to having approved plans for the entire phase. If you have any questions, please call Jim at Esgil Corporation (619) 560-1468. Thank you. ENCL: Story Determination cc; Building Department File ,. - • Section 420—STORY &K.4X STORl is (hat portion of a building included rv.tut.iii (In. up|\i " wrfice of anv floor and the upper surtaeeol the Hutu n«.\i ,iho\e i\n.pi dut (he (oprtxibl stor> shall N. that portion ot .1 huiMiiij.' UK link d hu^xcn (he upper surface ot the topmost floor and (lit. v.ulmj: 01 root 4bo«c If the finished floor level direct!) above a usable or unused ^ j. mjer-ftoor space is more than 6 feet above yradc as dtlincd hcam lor -^MKituo 50 percent of the total perimeter or is more than I2leclaho\e ;',/ fade u defined herein at any point, such usable or unused under fltxir .'f-t.tpex abill be considered as a story Q In <al(ul.ilinK the Muml*T o| shines in a building, the f ixlp m.ikos rofon-nto to lh«« "Mt.il pvnmvtcr" of the Wli.il would l>e the lot.il perimeter lor the hillside duell- ing A a Thi« intent ol the I.III^U.IKI.' ' total perimeter" is to define • the outer limits of any particular level under considera- tion Ihpiefore, in the case depicted, the total perimeter for the lowest level would l>e bounded by the retaining wall, the down- slo|)o exterior wall and the east and west exterior walls The dwell- ing illustrated has two stories and basement for the downslope fe HL- rf/ iH//VX\y v . ) t DXP^fXik 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE •*£A I riM TELEPHONE CARLSBAD, CA 92009-4859 W^l-^W (619)4381161 Cttp of Cartefmb COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT September 29, 1986 Mr. Pau^Grahanu__N^ce President <TCi~CostaHotel S Costa Del Mar Road Carlsbad, CA 92008 Dear Mr. Graham, We have reviewed your billing for Traffic Impact Fees, and the Bridge and Thoroughfare Benefit District. Also, we reviewed your billings for Public Facility Fees, which you have already paid in the total amount of $165,077.00. All of the ordinances involved do provide for either replacement unit credits or net increase in traffic impact for the calculation of fees. Therefore, we have recalculated the applicable fees with the following result Public Facility Fee 160 permits for 85-336-1 thru 8 Total Added Value $6,603,099 Less. 40 Units (25%) (1,650,760) NET VALUATION $4,952,339 X 2.5% 123,808 La Costa Paid (165,077) CREDIT DUE YOU $ ( 41,269) Traffic Impact Fee 160 Permits for 85-336-1 thru 8 (40) Units Demolished 120 Units applicable to calculation 120 Units X $270 $ 32,500 Bridge and Thoroughfare Benefit District Fee 160 Permits for 85-336-1 thru 8 (40) Units Demolished 120 Units applicable to calculation 120 Units X $220 $26,400 Mr. Paul Graham September 29, 1986 Page 2 SUMMARY: Credit. Public Facility Fee $(41,269) Correct Billing Traffic Impact Fee 32,400 Bridge and Thoroughfare District Fee 26,400 TOTAL DUE $ 17,531 We apologize for the error in the calculation of these fees, and hope that the corrected billing, which will be forthcoming, will be more satisfactory. Sincerely, MARTIN Director MO-MEB hmj C Ray Miller Ray Garrison WZMH Group Inc Architects & Planners January 15, 1985 10100 Santa Monica Blvd Suite 370 Los Angeles, California 90067 (213) 203-0991 Boston, Dallas, Denver, Los Angeles, New York City Calgary, Montreal, Toronto, Vancouver City of Carlsbad Building Department Inspection 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 Attn: Mr. Carter Darnell V Re: La Costa Hotel & Spa, #1896.04 Building Permit of North Wing of the Clubhouse Dear Mr. Darnell: Enclosed please find four (4) copies of the following archi- tectural sheets: A2.1, A2.5, A2.6, A2.7, A9.3, title sheet and one (1) copy of the Door Schedule. Since these sheets contain additional information that are requested by your department, they are to be replaced the obsolete sheets that were included in the four (4) sets that we sent you on December 17, 1984. By copy of this letter, we are also sending two (2) copies to Jim Gilshian of Esqil Corporation and one (1) copy to Captain Mike Smith of the Fire Department. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions regarding this project. Very truly yours, WZMH GROUP INC. Hieu Pnan Project Architect HP/nf Enclosures cc: Irv Roston Les Vaughn w/1 copy of print Jim Gilshian w/Esqil Corp. w/2 sets of print Mike Smith w/Fire Department w/1 set of print John Carson - WZMH w/1 set of print Mark Clark w/Marnell Corrao w/1 set of print Wayne Banks Hayder Faraj Paul Barnard AIA MRAIC Warwick Housden MR AIC ARIBA Bernard Himel MRAICDavid Habib AIA Richard Manning MRAIC ARIBA Wayne WJ Banks AIA MRAIC o ti CJ)O Co-STA /Jo}?/ J ok * . 4/7- Tsuchiyama & Kaino Consulting Mechanical Engineers Principals Victor M Tsuchiyama, PE Kenneth K Kaino, PE April 23, 1985 Senior Associate Thomas S Kaya Associates Kenneth H Ito, PE Paul D Gibson Stanleys Sato Mr. Martin Orenyak CITY of CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008 Subject. La Costa Hotel and Spa Gentlemen, We request that sanitary sewer pipes V and larger be allowed to slope at 1/8 inch per foot. This is due to an existing footing, floor framing and new ceiling height. It may create a problem during construction if the new pipes were sloped at \/k inch per foot. Your earliest consideration regarding this matter will be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, TSUCHIYAMA S KAINO Stanley S. Sato cc: Hadar Fa raj , WZMH I rv Roston , La Costa SSS bdh ECEIVED APR 2 61985 '-'OF CARLS IW» Building Departmp. • 3300 Irvine Avenue * Suite 200 • Newport Beach » California 92660 • (714) 756-0565 DEVELOPMENTAL • yS&r • 1200 ELM AVENUE SERVICES W&MjfM CARLSBAD, CA 92008-1989 BUILDING DEPARTMENT ^S3"& (619)438-5525 Cttp of Cartebab April 30, 1985 Tstichiyama & Kaino 3300 Irvine Avenue Suite 200 Newport Beach, CA 92660 LA COSTA HOTEL & SPA Your request of using the 1/8" tolerance per foot on the sanitary sewer line would be acceptable to this office providing 1. if undergroud system is used, please lay the pipe in a sand-bedded trench. v 2. if suspended, please install with the transit method to assure proper flow. For further information, you can contact me at this office at (619) 438-5525. TONY 11ATA Senior Building Inspector TM : Tsuchiyama & Kaino Consulting Mechanical Engineers Principals Victor M Tsuchiyama, PE Kenneth K Kama PE April 15, 1985 Senior Associate Thomas S Kaya Associates Kenneth H Ito, PE Paul D Gibson Stanleys Sato Mr. Tony Mata Senior Plumbing Inspector CITY OF CARLSBAD 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008 Subject: Existing Clubhouse La Costa Hotel & Spa Dear Mr. Mata: Due to the construction phasing at the clubhouse, temporary services must be provided in order that the business be kept in continuous operation. The most economical method is to locate the piped services on the roof. These temporary service pipes will be removed after permanent pipes are installed inside the clubhouse. If you have any questions please call. Sincerely, TSUCHIYAMA & KAiNO Stanley S. Sato SSS/lah cc: Mr. Irv Roston - La Costa Mr. Hader Faraj - WZMH Mr. Mark Clark - Marnell-Corrao RECEIVED APR 171985 CITY OF CARLSBAD Building Department 3300 Irvine Avenue • Suite 200 • Newport Beach • California 92660 • (714)756-0565 December 17, 1984 City of Carlsbad Building Inspection 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 Attn: Carter Darnell Re: La Costa Hotel & Spa WZMH No. 1896 Whole Bldg. Permit of the North Wing of the Clubhouse WZMH Group Inc Architects & Planners 10100 Santa Monica Blvd Suite 370 Los Angeles, California 90067 (213) 203-0991 Boston, Dallas, Denver, Los Angeles, New York City Calgary, Montreal, Toronto, Vancouver Dear Mr. Darnell: Enclosed herewith are four (4) sets of blue line prints. Please accept hereby our application for the North Wing of the Clubhouse. They are in addition to the drawings sent to you on September 26, 1984 which were for foundation only for the North Wing of the Clubhouse. By copy of this letter we are also sending two (2) sets of print to Jim Gilshian of Esgil Corporation, and one (1) set of print to Mike Smith of the Fire Department. Please advise Les Vaughn of La Costa if the applicant needs to complete any additional forms and any additional fees in connection with this application. Very truly yours, Hieu Phan • Project Architect HP/nf Enclosures cc: Irv Roston Les Vaughn w/1 copy of print Jim Gilshian w/Esgil Corp. w/2 sets of print Mike Smith w/Fire Department w/1 set of print John Carson - WZMH w/1set of print Mark Clark w/Marnell Corrao w/1set of print Wayne Banks Hayder Faraj Paul Barnard AIA MRAICWarwick Housden MRAIC ARIBABernard Himel MRAIC DavidHabibAIARichard ManningMRAIC ARIBAWayneWJ BanksAIA MRAIC Marnell Corrao Associates City of Carlsbad Tony Mata Project Project Number Date La Costa Hotel & Spa 5/19/86 We are forwarding you via the following Herewith Messenger Pick-up Prints Sepia/Mylar Under Separate Cover x Federal Express Specifications Other Air Other Verification of glass installation per code from glass installer as requested by Tony Mata.EIVED These are For use on project Approved Approved as noted Not approved To be revised and resubmitted [,'AY 2 31986 (QITY OF CARLSBAD For proposal/quotationEujlai; g isGp3rtlTI6llf For your review and comment For your approval For your files Per your request At the request of Comments Please find attached verification that all glass installed in Clubhouse and South Guest Units meets codes per Dale Blust, President of A&D Glass, Inc. Hopefully, this satisfies your request. If not, please call. Thank you. cc: Irv Roston, w/enc. Irv Bennett, w/enc. Marnell Corrao Associates Mark W. Clark/ds 4495 SOUTH POLARIS AVENUE • LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89103 • 702-739-9413 RECEIVES MAY 1 + 1986* 24 HOUR EMERGENCY SERVICE License Number 3169,86 1903-D WEST VISTA WAY VISTA, CALIFORNIA 92083 PHONE (714) 758-1673 /V S s <y /"a' 24 HOUR EMERGENCY SERVICE License Number 318986 MAY \ 4 -IWw 1903-D WEST VISTA WAY VISTA, CALIFORNIA 92083 PHONE (714) 758-1673 /r RECEIVED MAY 1 24 HOUR EMERGENCY SERVICE License Number 3-.898S 1903-D WEST VISTA WAY VISTA, CALIFORNIA 92082 PHONE (714) 758-W7S /f sV-AtsTLJ <? n RECEIVED APR 2 21985 1!!°! o"Flc« CITY OF CARLSBAD Building Department April 17, 1985 PG-1557 Mr. Martin Orenyak Director of Building and Planning CITY OF CARLSBAD 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008-1989 Re Expansion of La Costa Hotel & Spa - CUP-258 Dear Mr. Orenyak: Thank you for the cooperation and assistance extended to us on the permit approval process for the 76 south units of the hotel. It was greatly appreciated and allowed our contractor to continue his work in an orderly progression. In response to your letter of April 9th, wherein you stated that the permits for the north units of the hotel would not be issued until all conditions of CUP-258 have been satisfied, please be assured that La Costa will fully meet all City requirements. However, I would like to bring to your attention the concerns we have on any raised median installation along our frontage on El Camino Real. At the time of the public hearing, before the Planning Commission on October 10, 1984, a discussion was held on whether or not the design of the present median along El Camino Real should be changed to a raised median. The discussion arose because of the standard City re- quirement to have El Camino Real improved to a one-half width prime arterial street - which means a raised median. I had pointed out to the Commissioners that at various times of the year, when La Costa is hosting a major sporting event, several thousand cars traveling south on El Camino Real need to enter or exit the main entrance of the hotel and Arenal Road. A raised median would back up that traffic a con- siderable distance and create a serious and dangerous bottleneck on El Camino Real . At the present time, such traffic can stack up between the yellow lined median, safely and without interfering with other south- bound traffic. COSTA DEL MAR ROAD CARLSBAD CALIFORNIA 9SOOB AREA CODE 619 TELEPHONE 438-9111 PG-1557 4/17/85 Page 2 I also pointed out that the fire engines and paramedic truck, from the fire station on Arena! Road, would be hampered in their efforts to safely exit on to the southbound lanes of El Camino Real. The Commissioners recognized the problems and directed that a traffic study be conducted to determine the feasibility and necessity of changing the design of the present median. In any study undertaken, may I suggest that both the Fire and Police Departments be consulted. I would also like the oppor- tunity to provide additional input, of other factors associated with hotel traffic, which impact the design of the median and are too numerous to include in this letter. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, LA COSTA HOTEL AND SPA PAUL GRAHAM PG:jb JN Carl B Johnson Svend H Nielsen PerT Ron James S Lai JOHNSON & NIELSEN ASSOCIATES CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS 7462 N Figueroa Street, Los Angeles, CA 90041 4310 Orange Street, Riverside, CA 92501 A* 18009 Skypark Circle, Suite L, Irvine, CA 92714 (213) 256-2237 (714) 686-5122 (714) 261-1495 PLAN REVISIONS DATE: February 12, 1985 TO: Tony Mata City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, California 92123 JOB NO: N83-201 PROJECT NAME: La Costa Hotel & Spa ARCHITECT. WZMH Group California, Inc. CONTRACTOR: Marnell Corrao Associates CITY: Carlsbad, California THE FOLLOWING ITEM(S) ARE REVISIONS TO OUR LATEST SET OF PLANS: ITEM 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 5. 7. 8. 9. SHEET S-1.3 S-2.1 S-3.1 S-3.2 S-3.2 S-3.2.1 S-3.3 S-4.1-4.12 fttrn >' 'tow REVISION Added detail 21, typical pipe and trench detail. Added foundations for colonade area. Added framing for colonade area. Added framing for colonade area. Added miscellaneous seismic tie details. Added sheet detailing floor level breaks. Added miscellaneous seismic tie details. Added miscellaneous seismic tie details and foundation and column call-outs for colonade area. 12x12 tied pilasters shown on frame 4, sheet S-4.2 were omitted by Contractor from foundation to mezzanine level, 8' south of grid line 1.6 and 8' north of grid line 1. An acceptable alternative would be to core 2" 0 holes, 5' deep just off centerline of 12" block and place (l)-#8 bar in each hole such that these bars could lap to vertical steel in the pilaster between the mezzanine floor and the upper floor. Core holes with the #8 bars should be repacked with either 5 star grout or high strength epoxy. Horizontal steel in the wall should not be cut. 3ITY JF CARLSBAD Building cc:Gene Meier/Esgil Corporation Mark Clark/Marnell Corrao Irv Bennett/Marnell Corrao Hieu Phan/WZMH Irv Roston/La Costa Hotel STRUCTURAL ENGINEER LEUCADIA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT POST OFFICE BOX 2397 • LEUCADIA CALIFORNIA 92O24 O954 • (619) 753 O15S January 28, 1985 City of Carlsbad Building Department 1200 Elm Ave. Carlsbad, CA 92008 Re- Additional Sewer Permits for La Costa Hotel Expansion Gentlemen- Please be advised the La Costa Hotel and Spa has purchased sewer permits for the above referenced expansion. The breakdown of the fees and EDU count is as follows 1. Two additonal hotel units with no kitchen units = .66 EDU ~s (.33 EDU/unit X 2 units = 66) 2. $1,500.00/EDU X .66 EDU's = $990.00 (paid with check #31187) I have enclosed a copy of the sewer permt and a drawing provided by La Costa Hotel and Spa of their expansion. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have further questions. Yours very truly, LEUCADIA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT Clyde W Brooks Administrative Aide RECEIVED enc1' JAN 2 91985 CITY OF CARLSBAD Building Department DISTRICT OFFICE I960 LA COSTA AVENUE • CARLSBAD. CALIFORNIA •/ r-. EBERHART & STONE, INC. DAN R EBERHART. CEG GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS GERALD L STONE. RCE 2211 E WINSTON ROAD. SUITE F» ANAHEIM. CA 92806* (714) 991-0163 5205 AVENIDA ENCINAS. SUITE C • CARLSBAD. CA92008 • (619)438-9416 W.O. 1308 January 11, 1985 La Costa Hotel & Spa Costa Del Mar Road Carlsbad, California 92008 Attention: Mr. Irv Roston Subject: Results of chemical analysis and corrosive characteristics of soil. La Costa resort expansion, Carlsbad, California. Gentlemen : Presented herewith are the results of the chemical soil testing and analysts for corrosive characteristics in consideration of proposed underground ferrous metal pipes at the subject project, The results indicate that the onsite and proposed soil types anticipated to be utilized in the subject construction are extremely corrosive to ferrous metal structures. A corrosion engineering firm should be consulted for recommendations on protecting underground pipes from damage due to corrosion. Should you desire further information, please feel free to call. Respectfully submitted, EBERHART & STONE, INC. Vice President GLS:bw Enclosure: Laboratory Analysis for Corrosivity of Soil, by Harco Corporation Distribution: 2) Addressee 2) Tsuchiyama & Kaino, Attn. : Stan Sato SOUTHERN CALIFDRN 6ZBC RIVERC-ALE ST SAN DIEGO CALIF 9Z1ZD 7 4 - B 3 1 V E L I E WAY PALM DESERT 6 7 B ENTERPRISE ST ESCONDIDO, A SOIL TELE ZBO-43Z1 . CALIF CALIF AND TESTING, INC P D BOX ZOGZ7 SAN DIEGD CALIF 9Z1ZO 9 2 2 6 D • TELE 3 4 6 - 1 O 7 B 9 Z O Z 5 • TELE 746-4544 SCS&T 8522002 Report No. 6 October 22, 1985 Marnell Corrao Associates 2001 Arena! Drive Carlsbad, California 92008 Attention: Mr. Mark Clark Reference: La Costa Country Club Subject: Compressive Strength of Drilled Cores Gentlemen: At your request, we have received and tested two cores from the Clubhouse Footings at Line D between Lines F-3 & 15, placed on September 4, 1985. The cores were requested to be tested at an age of 28 Days after placement of the concrete. The procedures of ASTM C42, "Obtaining and Testing Drilled Cores and Sawed Beams of Concrete" were followed. The cores' nominal diameter was 5.70 inches. The tested core heights and compressive strengths are provided below. Core No. As-Received Height, in Tested Height, in Total Load, Ibs Compressive Strength, psi 13.00 11.42 91,500 3,590 12.50 11.50 93,000 3,640 We appreciate the opportunity to provide our services in this matter. Respectfully submitted, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL AND TESTING, INC. David J. Akers, R.C.E. #26815 (7) per distribution RECEIVED OCT231985 CITY OF CARLSBAD Building Department SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL AND TESTING,I N C Marnell Corrao Associates January 30, 1986 Mr. Tony Mata City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Street Carlsbad, CA 92008' Reference: Dear Tony: La Costa Hotel & Spa Occupancy of Bldg. S-2 Our Project #822 We are hereby requesting occupancy of Building S-2 at La Costa Hotel & Spa. Building S-2 is officially located at: La Costa Hotel & Spa 2100 Costa Del Mar Road Carlsbad, CA 92008 A temporary access sidewalk shall be provided for access to building front. Building shall be furnished February 1, 1986. Building is fully sprinklered and fire extinguishers are installed. All emer- gency exits are installed and accessible. Parking shall be provided directly across the street. We feel this building is ready for occupancy, effective February 3, 1986. Thank you for your cooperation and attention to this matter. Very truly yours, MARNELL CORRAO ASSOCIATES Mark W. Clark MWC/t cc: Irv Roston Mike Smith Irv Bennett 4495 South Polaris Avenue Las Vegas Nevada 89103 • 702-739-9413 Attending: LA COSTA RESORT EXPANJ —• -——Minutes of Meeting held Dec. 4, 1985 Horace Ketcham, Doug Wigle, Tom Kaiser, COUNTY HEALTH DEPT. Marty Orenyak, Tony Mada, CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPT. Irv Roston, Jack McCabe, Les Vaughn Mr. Ketcham gave an overview of the Health Department's responsibility to the public and to La Costa. Plans should have been submitted to the County Health Department before the Building Department permits were issued. Mr. Roston suggested the missing details and/or plans be itimized to that Mr. McCabe can clarify the details or prepare plans that will satisfy the Health Department, in order to get an approval to do the work and not delay the job. Floor Drains: Floor drains should be installed in new floors; however, in remodeled areas it is not necessary to tear out and install floor drains. In some cases, floor drains cannot be installed because of the danger of sloping the floor to the drain. Floor sinks should not be substituted for floor drains. Mr. McCabe explained that the floor sinks would be recessed so that the top edge of the rim will be below the floor surface. Fees: Mr. Ketcham said that, because this is such a large job, the standard fee schedule for plan checking will not cover the time required to complete. Mr. Roston assured him that La Costa is prepared to pay whatever is necessary to get the plans checked as soon as possible, to avoid any work delays. Mr, McCabe will walk the site with Messrs. Ketcham, Kaiser and Wigle, to familiarize everyone with the scope of work, then will spend whatever time necessary to go through the plans with Mr. Wigle in the Executive Conference Room. s Vaughn 2/4/85 LLV/bl cc: All attending RECEIVED DEC CITY OF CARLSBAD Building Department Marnell Corrao Associates 30 September 1985 Marty Orenyak City of Carlsbad Building Dept. 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008-1989 RE: La Costa Hotel & Spa Code Clarification Dear Marty: Thank you for clarifying our questions as related to architectural drawings by WZMH Group, Inc. Detail in question was 13/A4.7. Corridor shown on 13/A4.7 required one (l)-hour construction. One (l)-hour construction can be achieved with one (1) layer of 5/8" drywall nailed to the bottom of 2 x joists with 16" on center or less spacing. Existing joists are spaced 16" on center allowing us to install one (1) layer of drywall rather than two (2) layers of 5/8" drywall as shown on 13/A4.7. WZMH shall revise this detail. This same detail, 13/A4.7 causes uncertainty as to the ceiling requirements of the entire lower level of the clubhouse. Our interpretation of your clarification is as follows: Kitchens shall have one (1) layer of 5/8" drywall nailed to the bottom of existing 2 x joists which are spaced 16" on center. We shall provide drywall draft stops around kitchen perimeters as required by building department. All public dining facilities shall receive a dropped drywall ceiling in accordance with interior drawings. Non-public areas shall be in accordance with WZMH's reflected ceiling plans. This building shall be fully sprinklered in accordance with Grinnell Fire Protection Systems as reviewed by Fire Captain Mike Smith. RECEIVED OCT 41985 CITY OF CARLSBAD 4495 South Polaris Avenue Las Vegas Nevada 89103 • 702-7 3 Marty Orenyak Code Clarification Page 2 If the above summarization is inaccurate or unclear in any manner, please contact my office immediately at 438-8044. Thank you for your cooperation and timely response to our problem. Very truly yours, MARNELL CORRAO ASSOCIATES Mark W. Clark MWC/ds cc: Irwin Molasky Allard Roen Irv Roston Les Vaughn Irv Bennett Barry Robles file / 1200 ELM AVENUE • ^g^ M TELEPHONE CARLSBAD, CA 92008 1989 m&ffilc£M (619> 438 5525 Citp of Cartefcafo BUILDING DEPARTMENT May 1, 1985 Mr Paul Graham La Costa Hotel and Spa Costa Del Mar Road Carlsbad, Calif 92008 LA COSTA HOTEL AND SPA - CUP 258 I am pleased that we were able to assist you with the issuance of your permits for the south units of the hotel. However, in your letter of April 17, 1985, you have expressed concerns you have with the installation of a raised median along El Camino Real. These concerns are reflected in the Planning Commission minutes of October 10 A copy is enclosed and highlighted for your infor- mation. Obviously these issues must be resolved to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. I would urge you to contact Acting City Engi- neer, Marty Bouman as soon as possible for a traffic study and resolution of the median condition so that future permits can be processed without delay. Please contact me if I can be of further assistance. MARTIN ORENYAK ^V DIRECTOR OF BUILDING AND PLANNING cd C: Marty Bouman PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2366 1 2 5 4 5 6 ' City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission; and 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 19 20 22 23 24 25 27 28 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO EXPAND THE LA COSTA HOTEL AND SPA ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EL CAMINO REAL BETWEEN ARENAL ROAD AND THE SAN MARCOS CREEK. APPLICANT: LA COSTA HOTEL AND SPA CASE NOt CUP-258 WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Planning Commission did, on the 10th day of October, 1984, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider said application on property described as: Those portions of Section 26 and 35 in Township 12 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Meridian, in the City of Carlsbad, in the County of San Diego, State of California, according to official plat thereof _„ WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing andJ. / considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons18 2_ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to CUP-258. Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows: A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission APPROVES CUP-258, based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: Findings: 1) The requested use is necessary or desirable for the development of the community, is essentially in harmony with the various elements and objectives of the general plan, and is not detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically provided and maintained. 7 4) The street system serving the proposed use is adequate to 9 10 5) The project is consistent with all City public facility pol- icies and ordinances since: 11 a) The Planning Commission has, by inclusion of an 12 13 14 15 16 19 20 21 22 26 27 28 permitted in the zone in which the proposed use is to be located for the reasons stated in the staff report. 2) The site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use for the reasons stated in the staff report. 3) All of the yards, setbacks, walls, fences, landscaping, and other features necessary to adjust the requested use to existing or permitted future uses in the neighborhood will be — , ,__ _ ^ _ _ _ __ ^ fc__i___ _ _ ^ __ _ A — _ properly handle all traffic generated by the daily use of the facility and that major event traffic can be handled by strict traffic control appropriate condition to this project, insured that the project will not be approved unless the City Council finds that sewer service is available to serve the project. In addition, the Planning Commission has added a condition that building permits may not be issued for the project unless the City Engineer determines that sewer service is available, and building cannot occur within the project unless sewer service remains available, and the Planning Commission is satisfied that the requirements of the public facilities element of the general plan have been 17 met insofar as they apply to sewer service for this project. 18 b) All necessary public improvements have been provided or will be required as conditions of approval. c) The applicant has agreed and is required by the inclusion of an appropriate condition to pay a public facilities fee. Performance of that contract and payment of the fee will enable this body to find that public facilities will be available concurrent with need as required by the general plan. 23 f) Assurances have been given that adequate sewer for the 24 project will be provided by the Leucadia County Water District. 25 6) This project will not cause any significant environmental impacts and a Negative Declaration has been issued by the Land Use Planning Manager on September 25, 1984 and approved by the Planning Commission on October 10, 1984. PC RESO NO. 2366 -2- 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 28 1 Conditions; 2 General 3 conditions. 6 2) This project is approved upon the express condition that 1) Approval is granted for CUP-258, as shown on Exhibit 'A1, and 'B1, dated September 10, 1984, incorporated by reference and on file in the Land Use Planning Office. Development shall occur substantially as shown unless otherwise noted in these building permits will not be issued for development of the subject property unless the City Engineer determines that sewer facilities are available at the time of application for such sewer permits and will continue to be available until time of occupancy. 3) This project is approved upon the express condition that the applicant shall pay a public facilities fee as required by City Council Policy No. 17, dated April 2, 1982, on file with the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference, and according to the agreement executed by the applicant for payment of said fee, a copy of that agreement, dated July 23, 1984, is on file with the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference. If said fee is not paid as promised, this application will not be consistent with the General Plan and approval for this project shall be void. 15 4) Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of building permit issuance. 5) Water shall be provided by the City of Carlsbad. Land Use Planning 6) The applicant shall prepare a detailed landscape and irriga- tion plan which shall be submitted to and approved by the Land Use Planning Manager prior to the issuance of building permits. 7) All parking lot trees shall be a minimum of 15 gallons in size. 8) All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris. 9) Any signs proposed for this development shall be designed in conformance with the City's Sign Ordinance and shall require review and approval of the Land Use Planning Manager prior to installation of such signs. 27 10) Trash receptacle areas shall be enclosed by a six-foot high masonry wall with gates pursuant to City standards. Location of said receptacles shall be approved by the Land Use Planning Manager. PC RESO NO. 2366 -3- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 11) 12) All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shall be architecturally integrated and shielded from view and the sound buffered from ad3acent properties and streets, pursuant to Building Department Policy No. 80-6, to the satisfaction of the Land Use Planning Manager and Building and Planning Director. This conditional use permit shall be reviewed by the Land Use Planning Manager on a yearly basis to determine if all conditions of this permit have been met and that the special event uses as discussed in the staff report do not have a significant detrimental impact on surrounding properties or the public health and welfare. If the Land Use Planning Manager determines that the use has such significant adverse impacts, the manager shall recommend that the Planning Commission, after providing the permittee the opportunity to be heard, add additional conditions to mitigate the significant adverse impacts. This permit may be revoked at any time after a public hearing, if it is found that the use has a significant detrimental affect on surrounding land uses and the public's health and welfare, or the conditions imposed herein have not been met. Cngineering 3, L4) L5) Ull Illl III! Illl Illl Illl Illl The developer shall obtain a grading permit prior to the commencement of any clearing or grading of the site.- Prior to issuance of a grading permit for grading within the 100 year flood plain the developer shall obtain a special use permit. The grading for this project is defined as "controlled grad- ing" by Section 11. 06. 170 (a) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Grading shall be performed under the observation of a civil engineer whose responsibility it shall be to coordinate site inspection and testing to insure compliance of the work with the approved grading plan, submit required reports to the City Engineer and verify compliance with Chapter 11.06 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. PC RESO NO. 2366 -4- 1 16) No grading shall occur outside the limits of the 2 owners of the affected properties. 3 17) A separate grading plan shall be submitted and approved and a 4 if located within the city limits 5 18) All slopes within this project shall be no steeper than 2:1. 6 19) Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to any 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 26 project unless a letter of permission is obtained from the separate grading permit issued for the borrow or disposal site proposed construction site within this project the developer shall submit to and receive approval from the City Engineer for the proposed haul route. The developer shall comply with all conditions and requirements the City Engineer may impose with regards to the hauling operation. 20) The developer shall exercise special care during the construction phase of this project to prevent any "off-site -siltation. The developer shall provide erosion control measures and shall construct temporary desiltation/detention basins of type, size and location as approved by the City Engineer. The basins and erosion control measures shall be shown and specified on the grading plan and shall be constructed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to the start of any other grading operations. Prior to the removal of any basins or facilities so constructed the area served shall be protected by additional drainage facilities, slope erosion control measures and other methods required or approved by the City Engineer. The developer shall maintain the temporary basins and erosion control measures for a period of time satisfactory to the City Engineer and shall guarantee their maintenance and satisfactory performance through cash deposit and bonding in amounts and types suitable to the City Engineer 19 21) Additional drainage easements and drainage structures shall be 20 provided or installed as may be required by the County Department of Sanitation and Flood Control or the City Engi- 21 22 23 24 25 neer. 22) The developer shall commission a HEC-2 Study of San Marcos Creek that considers the effect of the raised pads, roadway and structures proposed by this project. The study's form, content and extent shall be of degree & quality to satisfy the City Engineer. Approval of any and all new raised pads, roadway or structures proposed by this project shall be contingent on the HEC-2 Study showing that no public facility, public lands, private facility or private lands held by other than the developer will be damaged by a 100- year (1%) storm. 27 28 //// -5- 2 5 4 5 6 requirements for El Camino Real and La Costa Avenue. 7 24) Improvements listed in this section shall be installed or 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 23) Direct access rights for all lots abutting El Camino Real and La Costa Avenue shall be waived. The developer shall make an offer of dedication to the City for all public streets and easements required by these conditions or shown on the Site Development Plan. The offer shall be made prior to issuance of any Building Permit for this project. All land so offered shall be granted to the City free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and without cost to the City. Streets that are already public are not required to be rededicated. This includes full right-of-way Engineer. 18 b) La Costa Avenue to one-half width secondary arteria 19 street standards along the frontage of the parcel o which the project is located. 20 25) The driveway width for the 78 space parking lot on Aren Road shall be reduced to 28 feet. agreed to be installed by secured agreement by the developer before the issuance of any building permit. The developer shall obtain approval of the plans from the City Engineer and pay all associated fees and performance guarantees prior to issuance of any building permit. The developer shall install said improvements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or occupancy of any portion of the project for any purpose. The improvements are: a) El Camino Real to one-half width prime arterial street standards from Arenal Road to the southerly line of the parcel on which the project is located. The construction of the median shall be separately secured in a form acceptable to the City Attorney and City Engineer and shall be constructed at such time as required by the City Engineer. The median shall be designed such that traffic created by sporting events at La Costa Hotel can be accommodated subject to the approval of the City 26) Unless a standard variance has been issued, no variance City Standards are authorized by virtue of approval of -cms project plan. 27) The developer shall construct private street accesses to public streets in such a way as to clearly designate that the private streets are not a portion of the public street system. The developer shall place a plaque-type sign with the legend, "PRIVATE STREET BEYOND THIS POINT, right to pass revocable to non-tenants at anytime" at the access point to private streets from public streets. The script on the sign shown above shall be capital letters of a size and contrast such as to be readable for a normally sighted person at a distance of 20 feet. The provisions of this condition shall be met to thesatisfaction of the City Engineer pri9r to issuance of aCertificate of Occupancy for any portion of this project. ?C RESO NO. 2366 -6- 1 28) The developer shall comply with all the rules, regulations and 2 regarding services to the pro}ect. 3 29) The design of all private streets and drainage systems shall 4] be approved by the City Engineer prior to approval of the final map. The structural section of all private streets 5 shall conform to City of Carlsbad Standards based on R-value tests. All private streets and drainage systems shall be 6 inspected by the city, and the standard improvement plan check and inspection fees shall be paid prior to approval of 7 the final map. 8 30) All private streets and drainage systems shall be maintained by the owner. 9 31) All private driveways shall be kept clear of parked vehicles 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 design requirements of the respective sewer and water agencies at all times, and shall have posed "No Parking/Fire Lane Tow Away Zone" pursuant to Section 17.04.040, Carlsbad Municipal Code. 32) All plans, specifications, and supporting documents for the improvements of this project shall be signed and sealed by the Engineer in responsible charge of the work. Each sheet shall be signed and sealed, except that bound documents may be signed and sealed on their first page. Additionally the first sheet of each set of plans shall have the following certificate: "DECLARATION OF RESPONSIBLE CHARGE" I hereby declare that I am the Engineer of Work for this project, that I have exercised responsible charge over the design of the project as defined in Section 6703 of the Business and Professions Code, and that the design is consistent with current standards. I understand that the check of project drawings and specifications by the City of Carlsbad is confined to a review only and does not relieve me, as Engineer of Work, of my responsibilities for project design. (Name, Address and Telephone of Engineering firm) Firm: Address: City, St.: Telephone: BY Date: (Name of Engineer) 28 R.C.E. NO. # PC RESO NO. 2366 -7- 1 33) The developer shall provide the city with a reproducible 2 3 City Engineer prior to improvement plan submittal, 4 34) Prior to issuance of any building permit for this 11 12 13 14 ,20 21 22 23 and Landscaping District No. 1. 7 (Fire Conditions 8 35) Prior to issuance of building permits, complete building 9 plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Fire Department. 10 36) Additional public and/or on site fire hydrants shall be mylar copy of the site plan as approved by the Planning Commission. The site plan shall reflect the conditions of approval by the city. The plan copy shall be submitted to the development, the owner shall give written consent to the annexation of the area shown within the boundaries of the site plan into the existing City of Carlsbad Street Lighting provided if deemed necessary by the Fire Marshall. 37) The applicant shall submit two (2) copies of a site plan showing locations of existing and proposed fire hydrants and on site roads and drives to the Fire Marshal for approval. 38) An all weather access road shall be maintained throughout construction. 15 39) All required fire hydrants, water mains and appurtenances 16 shall be operational prior to comb ' " " -•---• • • being located on the project site. 17 40) Proposed security gate systems shall be provided with "Knox" 18 key operated override switch, as specified by the Fire De- partment . 19 41) All private driveways shall be kept clear of parked vehicles at all times, and shall have posted "No Parking/Fire Lane-Tow Away Zone" pursuant to Section 17.04.040, Carlsbad Muncipal Code. 42) All fire alarm systems, fire hydrants, extinguishing systems, automatic sprinklers, and other systems pertinent to the project shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to construction. 24 43) Building exceeding 10,000 sq.ft. aggregatae floor area shall 25 be sprinklered or have four-hour fire walls with no openings therein which shall split the building into 10,000 sq.ft. (or 26 less) areas. 27 28 PC RESO NO. 2366 -8- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 10th day of October, 1984, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Chairman Rombotis, Commissioners Marcus, Schlehuber, McFadden, Smith and L'Heureux. None. Commissioner Farrow. None. •RRY/ROMBQTis, CHAIRMAN BAD PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: MICHAEL J. HWLZMILLBK LAND USE PLANNING MANAGER PC RESO NO. 2366 -9- MINUTES Meeting of: Date of Meeting: Time of Meeting: Place of Meeting: PLANNING COMMISSION October 10, 1984 6:00 p.m. City Council Chambers COMMISSIONERS CALL TO ORDER; The Meeting was called to order by Chairman Rombotis at 6:14 p.m. ROLL CALL; Present: Chairman Rombotis, Commissioners L'Heureux, Schlehuber, Smith, Marcus and McFadden. Absent: Commissioner Farrow. PLEDGE OF ArJJGIANCE was led by Chairman Rombotis. PLANNING COMMISSION PROCEDURE was called to the attention of the audience as it appears on the back of the Agenda. NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS; 1. CUP-230(A) - YADA FARMS - Request for approval of an amendment to a conditional use permit to add 24,640 sq. ft. of greenhouse area at 2928 Valley Street, on the east side of Valley Street between Elm Avenue and Buena Vista Avenue in the R-1-7,500 zone. Charles Grimm, Principal Planner, gave the presentation on this item as contained in the staff report, using a wall chart to show the location of the property. This would be a five-year CUP, with a yearly review. Chairman Rombotis opened the public hearing at 6:20 p.m. and issued the invitation to speak. Mr. Henry Yada, 5538 El Camino Real, the applicant, addressed the Commission, stating he was familiar with the conditions. Since no one else wished to speak on this item, the public testimony was concluded at 6:21 p.m. Planning Commission approved the Negative Declaration issued by the Land Use Planning Manager and adopted the following Resolution: RESOLUTION NO. 2363, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO PERMIT THE ADDITION OF A 24,640 SQUARE FOOT GREENHOUSE ON 4.39 ACRES OF PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF VALLEY STREET BETWEEN ELM AVENUE AND BUENA VISTA AVENUE, AT 2928 VALLEY STREET. 2. CUP-258 - LA COSTA HOTEL & SPA - A conditional use permit to expand and refurbish the La Costa Hotel and Spa located on the east side of El Camino Real between Arenal Road and the San Marcos Creek. Bill Hofrnan, Principal Planner, gave the report as contained in the staff report, using a transparency to show the site and a wall exhibit to show the La Costa expansion. Chairman Rombotis opened the public hearing at 6:26 p.m. and issued the invitation to speak. Rombotis L'Heureux Schlehuber Smith Marcus McFadden MINUTES Planning Commssion Page 2 COMMISSIONERS Mr. Paul Graham, Vice-President of La Costa Hotel and Spa, addressed the Commission, stating he was in agreement with staff except for some questions on page 6. He asked why Condition 23 was included and Walter Brown stated this was a standard Engineering condition. Mr. Graham stated they had no access there and Chairman Rombotis added this would preclude opening a driveway onto El Camino Real. Mr. Graham referred to mention of La Costa Avenue in Condition 23 and Condition 24 b. Walter Brown stated the assessor's map shows La Costa Avenue fronting on the project, and as such, when the City can show benefit to the project and it is tied in to the project, the City can ask for those improvements. Mr. Graham stated they own only 300 feet there, and Mr. Brown assured him the City was only asking for improvements on the frontage he owned. Mr. Graham stated that was semi- acceptable. Mr. Graham stated the sidewalk along El Camino Real would be useless—going nowhere and not being used. Also he questioned the median on El Camino Real, stating there are special times when traffic could back up if a raised median were used and this could become dangerous. He recommended a traffic study be done on that segment between Arenal Road and the main entrance to La Costa, which is the area affected when sporting events are being held at La Costa. Another question by Mr. Graham was on the bonding for the improvements. He suggested they would sign an agreement and if and when Engineering decided the median was to go in, they would bond for it at that time. Mr. Graham felt he might have to be paying for the bonds for ten years before the improvements would go in. Walter Brown answered that the median problem would be taken care of at the design phase. As to the bonding, Mr. Brown said the City accepts other types of guarantees as long as it is secure. Mr. Brown suggested a cash deposit, and Mr. Graham said that was not what he had in mind. The Assistant City Attorney said a lien contract would be sufficient security for the amount of the improvements, and all others would cost something at the outset. Mr. Graham said he preferred that to a bond. Referring to the sidewalk, Mr. Graham stated he felt that should be excluded, and a sidewalk can't be placed north of Arenal up to Alga Road. Staff stated they felt a sidewalk was necessary, with Mr. Graham objecting at this point. Some Commissioners also stated they felt a sidewalk was necessary. Since no one else wished to speak on this item, the public testimony was concluded at 6:43 p.m. Commissioner Schlehuber commented he did not want the improvements to be a subordinated contract. MINUTES Planning Commission Page 3 COMMISSIONERS Motion was made and seconded to approve the Negative Declaration and adopt Resolution No. 2366, subject to amendments relative to bonding or such security lien as approved by the City Attorney. Staff to be cognizant of the left-turn problem with the median on El Camino Real. An addition was made to the motion to allow for special design of the median as called for by a traffic study. At this point, a motion was made and seconded to re- consider this item. Mr. John Carson, Architect, addressed the Commission, questioning Condition 6, on page 3, stating there would be no detailed landscape and irrigation plan until the fifth or sixth building permit. Bill Hofman answered that staff was aware of that and would add "or as otherwise approved by the Land Use Planning Manager." Chairman Rombotis closed the public hearing again at 6:51 p.m. Planning Commission approved the prior motion with an amendment, as follows: Planning Commission approved the Negative Declaration issued by the Land Use Planning Manager and adopted the following Resolution: RESOLUTION NO. 2366, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO EXPAND THE LA COSTA HOTEL AND SPA ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EL CAMINO REAL BETWEEN ARENAL PDAD AND THE SAN MARCOS CREEK. City Attorney's office to approve security lein for improvements. Traffic study by Engineering to determine special handling for median on El Camino Real and left-turn lane. Item 6 to add: "Or as otherwise approved by the Land Use Planning Manager." 3. CT 84-27/CP-295 - BANKO CONDOS - Request for a 12- unit tentative tract map and condominium permit on a .68 acre lot located on the southwest corner of Altisma Way and Caringa Way. Charles Grimm, Principal Planner, gave the presentation on this item as contained in the staff report, using a transparency to show the site, and stating the major issue was whether or not the density is justified. A wall chart was used showing the buildings as proposed and the exterior of the buildings. He stated that staff did not like the dominance of the driveway. Rombotis L'Heureux Schlehuber Smith Marcus McFadden Rombotis L'Heureux Schlehuber Smith Marcus McFadden MINUTES Planning Commission Page 4 COMMISSIONERS Also, there is no open appearance in the courtyard area, and staff does not feel the density is justified. Chairman Rombotis opened the public hearing at 6:55 p.m. and issued the invitation to speak. Mr. Edward J. Banko, 404 Loma Larga Drive, Solana Beach, CA, the applicant, addressed the Commission stating he was surprised at the negative staff report. He gave a copy of a map to the Commissioners showing the surrounding densities and asked the Commission what they would approve. Since no one else wished to speak on this subject, the public testimony was concluded at 7:00 p.m. There was a discussion about the driveway on Caringa Way being too close to the corner, and the problem of the density of the project. Staff stated they could support the project if one unit were deleted along Altisma Way. Commissioner L'Heureux stated there was a tight interior courtyard and it appeared that would be difficult to maneuver. Chairman Rombotis concurred with this, and stated the Commission could not re-desiqn the project. Planning Commission returned this item to staff and the applicant for a re-design. 4. ZCA-180 - CITY OF CARLSBAD - An amendment to Chapter 21.06 of the Zoning Ordinance regarding the regulation of land uses on properties having the Q Overlay Zone. Bill Hofman, Principal Planner, gave the presentation on this item as contained in the staff report. Chairman Rombotis opened the public hearing at 7:12 p.m. and issued the invitation to speak. Mrs. BeBe Grosse, 5850 Sunny Creek Road, addressed the Commission, commenting that the three hundred foot rule for notification would have helped on this item, as she found out by happenchance and felt the owners should have been notified. Since no one else wished to speak on this item, the public testimony was concluded at 7:14 p.m. Commissioner McFadden asked for an amendment to be added for notification of property owners within three hundred feet. Rombotis L'Heureux Schlehuber Smith Marcus McFadden MINUTES Planning Connu.ssi.on Page 5 COMMISSIONERS Planning Commission approved the Negative Declaration issued by the Land Use Planning Manager and adopted the following Resolution: RESOLUTION NO. 2365, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A ZONE CODE AMENDMENT, AMENDING TITLE 21, CHAPTER 21.06, SECTIONS 21.06.010 AND 21.06.020, OF THE CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE, BY THE ADDITION OF SUBSECTION 21.06.010(6) AND BY THE AMENDMENT OF SECTION 21.06.020 TO REGULATE LAND USES AND STRUCTURES IN THE Q (QUALIFIED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY) ZONE. DISCUSSION ITEM: 5. SDP 84-5 - CARLSBAD GATEWAY CENTER - Request for approval of a site development plan to allow construction of a mixed-use industrial/office complex on a 16.5 acre site on the east side of El Canu.no Real, north of the Cablevision building. Bill Hofman, Principal Planner, gave the presentation on this item as contained in the staff report, using a location map to show the site and a wall map to aid in explaining the pro3ect. He described the surrounding properties and discussed the access—a right turn in and out from El Camino Real. He showed the office buildings and the industrial buildings. A memorandum from the Land Use Planning Office dated today was given to the Commissioners with additional conditions, and the applicant acknowledged he had read those additional conditions. These conditions were to help mitigate the impact on the neighbors of this project. Staff stated they felt the uses should be limited and with the new amendment to the Q overlay, the types of uses can be controlled, subject to City Council approval. A list of appropriate uses was .attached to an exhibit. Walter Brown stated the nearby property owners wanted Palmer Way to connect with El Camino or College, but staff concluded the extension of Palmer was not warranted. He stated the right turn in and out on El Camino Real and the two driveways on Palmer provide more than adequate access and circulation. There is a condition to require acess to the one-acre parcel to the side. As to the drainage, a condition of approval requires the developer to design a drainage system to limit the maximum flow of water to that which now exists. Bill Hofman stated the applicant had requested condition 34K be deleted, and Mr. Brown stated they had conditioned it as shown on the site plan and he showed the acceleration and deceleration lanes on an exhibit. Mr. Don Schucard, 2820 Camino Del Rio South, addressed the Commission stating he did not want an unsafe situation on the acceleration and deceleration lanes. Mr. Schucard asked for a legal contract or document stating the stub street for Palmer Way be done at a later time and not now. He also stated there would be no buildings near the property line, with trees all around so the buildings would not be seen. All the buildings would be one story, except the office building, which would be two-story with a flat roof. Rombotis L'Heureux Schlehuber Smith Marcus McFadden MINUTES Planning Commission Page 6 COMMISSIONERS The Architect gave a drawing to the Commissioners. Mr. Schucard stated this project would be 100 feet above Sunny Creeek and the buildings would sit 166 feet back from the rim with several layers of landscaping, making it virtually impossible to see. He discussed the amenities of the project. Commissioner McFadden asked about an area for the employees to eat lunch and the applicant stated that was planned and he pointed out the area on a wall map. Mrs. Bebe Grosse, 5850 Sunny Creek Road, addressed the Commission, handing them photographs of the area, which are part of the record. She stated she had not seen the additional conditions handed out tonight. Mrs. Grosse stated this project was within their view sight, and expressed concern about the impacts. She particularly asked for a berm to be added and the sensitive rim not have any infringement. She also asked for a CUP to be required in order to have input from the surrounding neighorhood on any 24-hour use request. Mrs. Grosse discussed the drainage problem, stating this project would definitely create water because of the sensitive hillside. Mrs. June Applegate, representing the property to the north, addressed the Commission expresssing her concern about the drainage. She asked for "existing" to be changed to "natural" in condition 31, page 6. She also asked for the developer to participate in the costs if that condition is put in. Mrs. Applegate said the Deloren property is small and it would not be fair to put the drainage across that property. It would also take one third of that property to put Palmer Way through. Mr. Ralph Wrisley, 2080 Basswood, adjacent property owner, stated his property takes all the drainage from there and the Deloren property, and could not handle the silting and erosion. Mr. Joe Sandy, 2956 Roosevelt, representing Mike O'Hara, addressed the Commission, giving them copies of a report. (None to the Minutes Clerk) Mr. Sandy put up a wall map showing the O'Hara property and stated they had no objection to the concept, but were concerned about the equitable City standards and conditions affecting O'Hara's property. He said considerable time had been spent negotiating access. He used the tentative map to show the access and stated staff had said 1,200 feet was necessary. Mr. Sandy said the extension of Palmer was needed for all the projects. Mr. O'Hara felt he could be re-imbursed or go in with Roll Company. He added the connection is needed and should be required from the Roll Company. Mr. Sandy stated Mr. Banche would like to work with staff and present this to the Planning Commission and requested a continuance to do that. Mrs. Grosse stated the Sunny Creek area is under planning by the Planning staff and will come back to them the next meeting. MINUTES Planning Commission Page 7 COMMISSIONERS Mr. Schucard stated he needed a decision tonight; otherwise he would forfeit $100,000—and the project would be lost. Conmissioner Schlehuber stated he had a problem on the access. Conmissioner L'Heureux stated he needed more information from Engineering on access on El Canu.no Real and the 1,200 feet. He was also concerned about the storm drain problem. Also the optional uses and hours in the center should be considered, and he felt this had not been done. He felt this was not the best plan. Conmissioner McFadden concurred with Commissioner L'Heureux on the drainage and access to El Camino Real— particularly the drainage. Commissioner Marcus stated a lot of things needed to be addressed on this project. Chairman Rombotis stated the consensus of the Commission appeared to be that they could not approve this project in its present form unless the problems were solved. Chairman Rombotis asked the applicant whether he wanted a denial or a continuance to work with staff and the neighbors; the drainage problem; the access problem and the Palmer Way connection problem. Information is needed on the impacts on the surrounding residential neighborhoods. Also, if the Commission denies access to El Camino Real, that would cause a major re-design. The applicant stated his preference for a continuance. Commissioner Schlehuber made a motion to continue this item to the first meeting in November. There was no second. The Commission asked for the drainage problems, the El Camino Real access (only if have additional justification from the City Engineer), showing how they will avoid other problems; traffic down to O'Hara project and up to Faraday: mitigation of impacts on residental areas; noise and lighting, all to be discussed. Mr. Brown stated the question of the Barber connection and the right turn in and out; the O'Hara project, as well as the intersection with Faraday are all problems engineering has placed in the Commission's hands by asking for a variance. He said he had serious problems with the right turn in and out and urged that not be done. MINUTES Planning Ccmmssion Page 8 COMMISSIONERS Commissioner L'Heureux stated the project must be re- designed if access to El Camino is not allowed. By informal polling, the Commission agreed the problems as mentioned needed to be solved and continued this matter until November 14, 1984 to allow staff and the applicant have come to an agreement. OFF-AGENDA ITEM; The Assistant City Attorney, Dan Hentschke, asked for an off-agenda item. Mr. Hentschke stated that at the last meeting the Commission directed a change of the meeting time from 7:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. He stated he had prepared a resolution to that effect, and asked the Commission to adopt that resolution. The Planning Commission adopted the following Resolution: RESOLUTION NO. 2370, AMENDING SECTION 1 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION PROCEDURES TO CHANGE THE REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETING TIME FROM 7:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Approval of Minutes was postponed to the next meeting. Commissioner Schlehuber asked staff to provide maps showing broader areas when considering projects. Motion was made by Commissioner McFadden and seconded by Chairman Rombotis to have the Planning Commission recommend to Council that staff develop standards for outdoor lunch areas in MC, MB, M and non-residential land development with or without Q overlay and amend thee appropriate ordinances. Commissioner Schlehuber stated he wanted a staff report as to the effect of that without passing it through tonight. In answer to Commissioner L'Heureux's question as to her concerns, Commissioner McFadden stated there is no place for employees to eat. If there are over 50 employees, the State has laws, but in the other businesses and older industrial areas, the employees sometimes put tables out themselves. Commissioner Marcus commented this should be handled at the design stage as a policy. Planning Commission recommended to Council that staff develop standards for the appropriate ordinances to allow for outdoor lunch areas. Rombotis L'Heureux Schlehuber Smith Marcus McFadden Rombotis L'Heureux Schlehuber Smith Marcus McFadden X X X MINUTES Planning Commission Page 9 COMMISSIONERS Commissioner Snath asked whether some of the smaller items oould be handled by a sub-committee or hold workshops, due to the heavy work load of the Commission. Bill Hofman stated staff has set up a new system for scheduling, with the Land Use Planning Manager looking at all projects and scheduling them on a "first-come, first served" basis. The items and the people will have to wait in line, therefore, the Commission agendas will not be so heavy in the future. AtXTOURNMENT; By proper notion, the Meeting of October 10, 1984, was adjourned at 8:42 p.m. Respectfully submitted, MICHAEL J. HOLZMIl Land Use Planning Manager Harriett Babbitt Minutes Clerk MEETINGS ARE ALSO TAPED AID KEPT ON FILE UNTIL THE MINUTES ARE APPROVED.