HomeMy WebLinkAbout2100 COSTA DEL MAR RD; ; CB102421; Permit04-14-2011
City of Carlsbad
1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008
Commercial/Industrial Permit Permit No: CB102421
Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725
Job Address:
Permit Type:
Parcel No:
Valuation:
Occupancy Group:
Project Title:
Applicant:
SALCIDO VICTOR
2100 COSTA DEL MAR RD CBAD
Tl Sub Type: COMM
0000000000 Lot#: 0 Status:
$20,000.00 Construction Type: 5A Applied:
Reference #: Entered By:
LA COSTA CLUBHOUSE Plan Approved:
EXTERIOR STAIR AT BACK OF CLUBHOUSE FACING GOLF Issued:
Inspect Area:
Plan Check#:
Owner:
ISSUED
12/13/2010
MDP
04/14/2011
04/14/2011
2051 SAN ELIJO ROAD
CARDIFF BY THE SEA 92007
760815-1459
Building Permit
Add'l Building Permit Fee
Plan Check
Add'l Plan Check Fee
Plan Check Discount
Strong Motion Fee
Park Fee
LFM Fee
Bridge Fee
BTD #2 Fee
BTD #3 Fee
Renewal Fee
Add'l Renewal Fee
Other Building Fee
Pot. Water Con. Fee
Meter Size
Add'l Pot. Water Con. Fee
Reel. Water Con. Fee
Green Bldg Stands (SB1473) Fee
Fire Expedited Plan Review
$208.81 Meter Size
$0.00 Add'l Reel. Water Con. Fee
$135.73 Meter Fee
$0.00 SDCWA Fee
$0.00 CFD Payoff Fee
$4.20 PFF (3105540)
$0.00 PFF (4305540)
$0.00 License Tax (3104193)
$0.00 License Tax (4304193)
$0.00 Traffic Impact Fee (3105541)
$0.00 Traffic Impact Fee (4305541)
$0.00 PLUMBING TOTAL
$0.00 ELECTRICAL TOTAL
$0.00 MECHANICAL TOTAL
$0.00 ; Master Drainage Fee
Sewer Fee
$0.00 Redev Parking Fee
$0.00 Additional Fees
$1.00 HMPFee
$115.00
TOTAL PERMIT FEES
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$464.74
ERMFPTotal Fees:$464.74 Total Payments To Date:$0.00
PERMIT HAS EXPIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH C.B.C.
SECTION 106.4.4 AS AMENDED BY C.M.C.18.04.030
DATE SIGNATURE.
Inspector:
FINAL APPROVAL
Date:Clearance:
NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "Imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively
referred to as "fees/exactions." You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must
follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for
processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack,
review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition.
You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity
changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project. NOR DOES IT APPLY to any
fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired.
04-14-2011
City of Carlsbad
1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008
Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) Permit
Permit No:SW100550
Job Address:
Permit Type:
Parcel No:
Reference #:
CB#:
Project Title:
2100 COSTA DEL MAR RD CBAD
SWPPP
0000000000 Lot #: 0
102421
LA COSTA CLUB HOUSE
EXTERIOR STAIR AT BACK OF CLUBHOUSE FACING GOLF
Priority: M
Status:
Applied:
Entered By:
Issued:
Inspect Area:
Tier:
Applicant:
SALCIDO VICTOR
2051 SAN ELIJO ROAD
CARDIFF BY THE SEA 92007
760815-1459
Emergency Contact:
VICTOR SALCIDO
Owner:
ISSUED
12/13/2010
MDP
04/14/2011
1
760815-1459
SWPPP Plan Check
SWPPP Inspections
Additional Fees
$49.00
$208.00
$0.00
TOTAL PERMIT FEES $257.00
Total Fees:$257.00 Total Payments To Date:$257.00 Balance Due:$0.00
ncn
PERMIT HAS EXPIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH C.B.C,
SECTION 186.4.4 AS AMENDED BY C.M.C.18.04.Q30
DATE
J> '-' v-
Building Permit Appli<
Sm^^/- ^ggg paraday Ave _ Carlsfoa^ CA
^r CITY OF 760-602-2717/2718/27
f"*ARi SIR Af) Fax:760-602-8558VH3r/"\l\L«jDA'\L/ www.carlsbadca.gov
JOB ADDRESS
CT/PROJECT# LOT* PHASES # OF UNITS # BEDROOMS
Plan Check No. C/^* lO'^f^lcation
92008 Est. Value 2-G K
iy Plan Ck. Deposit
Date f 2-"" 1 3 °" I ^ SWPPP i ^ » cT^s^'
SUITE#/SPACE#/UNIT# APN / \
# BATHROOMS TENANT BUSINESS NAME C0NSTR.TYPE OCC. GROUP
DESCRIPTION OF WORK: Include Square Feet of Affected Area(s) . 1 /}/) /) /
fab A/&J £(-/%$ c/\i d*-A&5 £TA-HZ~ C*o3 5fy /?jS£M/-*/ ( ^f^yA^^t *i{?
i^/ ([^f^l^ „ , /
fl •& ~ fl ^ /} $
EXISTING USE " 1 PROPOSED USE GARAGE (SF)
1
CONTACT NAME (If Different Fom Applicant)\J 'ic^i-fif . Sft£-C,IJ>Q
ADDRESS .2^S"/ SfrfJ eL/jo Av£"
CITY STATE ZIP
PHONE . FAX
EMAIL
PROPERTY OWNER NAME >
ADDRESS /
2~[e>o C^oSiyt- o&i- /^A&— ¥-£>. *
CITY STATE ZIP
PHONE FAX
EMAIL
ARCH/DESIGNER NAME & ADDRESS STATE LIC. #
*?PflfTIOS (SF) DECKS (SF) FIREPLACE AIR CONDITIONING FIRE SPRINKLERS
•^ YES D # NO D YES d NO D YES D NO-D
APPLICANT NAME
ADDRESS
CITY STATE ZIP
PHONE FAX
EMAIL
CONTRACTOR BUS. NAME
ADDRESS
CITY STATE ZIP
PHONE FAX
EMAIL
STATE LIC.# CLASS CITY BUS. LIC.#
(Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires theapplicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law [Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of theBusiness and Professions Code] or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to acivil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars {$500}).
Workers' Compensation Declaration: / hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations:
O 1 have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this perm it is issued.
O 1 have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for, which this permit is issued. My workers' compensation insurance carrier and policy
number are: Insurance Co. Policy No. Expiration Date
This section need not be completed if the permit is for one hundred dollars ($100) or less.
O Certificate of Exemption: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, 1 shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers Compensation laws of
California. WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars (&100.000), in
addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees.
JS£ CONTRACTOR SIGNATURE j~| OAGENT DATE
I^ / hereby affirm that 1 am exempt from Contractor's License Law for the following reason:
G 1, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's
License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for
sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale).
D 1, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of
property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law).
tv 1 am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason:
1 . 1 personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. O Yes n No
2. 1 (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work.
3. 1 have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name address / phone / contractors' license number):
4. 1 plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone / contractors' license number):
5. 1 will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated {include name / address /phone / type of work):
/ .//,-
i £* foZT* ifrZ** <7 W__^ »•"» I *^^^L W |— I _, >£ * * / /
JB$ PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE /J^ Q&hAAfc U/&t£r~i ' ' J^AGENT DATE *f-'lty-//
Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505,25533 or 25534 of the
Presley-Tannertiazardous Substance Account Act? DYes D No
Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? O Yes O No
Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? G Yes d No
IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, t
EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT.
I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work this permit is issued (Sec. 3097 (i) Civil Code).
Lender's Name Lender's Address
I certify that I have read the application and state that the above Information is correct and that the information on the plans Is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction.
AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY INCONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT.
OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0' deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height.
180 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by
**>>£5 APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE
lit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is commenced for a period of 180 days (Section 106.4.4 Uniform Building Code).
DATE A'/4"/)
City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request
For: 10/04/2011
Permit# CB102421
Title: LA COSTA CLUBHOUSE
Inspector Assignment: PD
Description: EXTERIOR STAIR AT BACK OF CLUBHOUSE FACING
GOLF COARSE, NO ACCESS TO BUILDING
Type:TI
Job Address:
Suite:
Location:
APPLICANT SALCIDO VICTOR
Owner:
Remarks: Send Exp Letter ?
Sub Type: COMM
2100 COSTA DEL MAR RD
Lot: 0
Phone:
Inspector:
Total Time:Requested By: CHRISTINE
Entered By: CHRISTINE
CD Description
19 Final Structural
Act Comments
fi> A-
Comments/Notices/Holds
Associated PCRs/CVs/SWPPPs Original PC#
CV000348 CLOSED ELEC W/OUT PERMITS @ MAIN POOL;
O-STAGNANT WATER W/DEBRIS; CAUSED BY EMPLOYEES, BAD ODOR
Z- 4 BANNERS;
0-LANDSCAPE NOISE;
POSSIBLE BLDG SAFETY VIOLATION;
LA COSTA RESORT AND SPA; ROOF OVER EXISTING COVERED WALKWAY
LA COSTA RSRT & SPA-LIGHTING; DESIGN REV. (RETAIL 1-4)
LACOSTA RESORT REV TO STRUCT; STEEL SHOP DRAWINGS
LA COSTA CLUB HOUSE; EXTERIOR STAIR AT BACK OF CLUBHOUSE FACING GOL
LA COSTA RESORT; ADDTIION TO MEMBER LOUNGE
LA COSTA RESORT; POOL, RETAINING WALLS
; 860 SF RETAINING WALL FOR NEW POOL LOCATION
CV040642
CV060188
CV1 10591
CV990248
PCR03218
PCR04005
PCR04184
SW1 00550
SW110187
SW1 10258
CLOSED
CLOSED
OPEN
CLOSED
ISSUED
ISSUED
ISSUED
ISSUED
FINAL
ISSUED
SW110283 PENDING
Inspection History
Date Description
05/31/2011 66 Grout
05/23/2011
05/19/2011
05/12/2011
12 Steel/Bond Beam
12 Steel/Bond Beam
11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers
Act Insp Comments
AP PD
AP PD FOOTING
CO PD MISSING STEEL
WC PD WRONG PERMIT NUMBER
International Code Council
International Code Council
500 New Jersey Avenue* NW
-•x
inisttviduat named h^reon iaCERJIFlIO in tft«
categSrtBS showft, having be*n se certified puwsuaf* te
the preserved written
A
Not valid unless signed by certificate holdeR
a competent
standard*
Cb
-I
m,,, n,M/-v Development Services
BUILDING Building Division
CITY OF Plan CheCk 1635 Faraday Avenue
— -- -, 76
I°:6°2 -2719
\wwft.carlsbadca.gov
By: Steve Borossay (Contact Hours for Steve: Tues.-Fri., 1 pm - 5pm) Phone: 760-602-7541
Pate; ] Z.
• When corrections from all departments are received please run new prints *
• Please respond by indicating location of Plan Check items on plans •
Provide: A statement on the Title Sheet of the plans stating that the project shall comply with the 2007 CA Building Code, 2007
CMC, 2007 CPC, 2007 CEC and the 2008 CA Energy Efficiency Standards.
Provide: A note titled "Scope of Work" describing the work to be performed under this permit.
/'
A/ArcK.-U»^ .
!
1\ i Ci
NJ • /
Of V -~~-^..r,^^^
Approved on:
CITY OF
BUILDING PLANCHECK
CHECKLIST
E-36
Development Services
Land Development Engineering
1635 Faraday Avenue
760-602-2750
www.carlsbadca.gov
'/ODATE:
BUILDING ADDRESS:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER:
PLANCHECK NO.:
EST. VALUE:
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
APPROVAL
The item you have submitted for review has
been approved. The approval is based on
plans, information and/or specifications
provided in your submittal; therefore any
changes to these items after this date,
including field modifications, must be reviewed
by this office to ensure continued conformance
with applicable codes. Please review carefully
all comments attached, as failure to comply
with instructions in this report can result in
suspension of permit to build.
[3 A Right-of-Way permit is required prior to
construction of the following improvements:
DENIAL
ias)e see the attached list of outstanding issues marked with
/lake necessary corrections to plans or specifications for
ipliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit
corrected plans and/or specifications to the Building Dept. for
resubmittal to the Engineering Dept. Only the applicable
sheets have been sent.
l/V/fl
By
By
Date:
Date:
By:
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
INEERING AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE BUILDING PERMIT
•v.;;y'"'.' >i, '••",-•"••:: • ;• Date: ' .• ••--.•
ATTACHMENTS
CD Engineering Application
O Dedication Checklist
[~| Improvement Checklist
Q Neighborhood Improvement Agreement
Q Grading Submittal Checklist
Q] Reference Documents
Q Right-of-Way Permit Application and Info Sheet
Q Storm Water Applicability Checklist/Storm Water
Compliance Exemption Form
Name:
ENGINEERING DEPT. CONTACT PERSON
KATHLEEN LAWRENCE
City of Carlsbad
email: Kathleen.lawrence@carlsbadca.gov
Phone: 760-602-2741 Fax: 760-602-1052
NOTE: If there are retaining walls associated with your
project, please check with the building department if
these walls need to be pulled by separate RETAINING
WALL PERMIT.
E-36 Page 1 of 7 REV 6/30/10
1°' 2
n n
ND ,RD
9. INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT If your facility is located in the City of Carlsbad sewer
service area, you must complete the attached Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permit
Screening Survey. Fax or mail to Encina Wastewater Authority, 6200 Avenida Encinas,
Carlsbad, CA 92011, (760) 438-3941, Fax (760) 476-9852.
D
D
D
D
n n
n n
n n
n n
n n
STORM WATER
Construction Compliance
10a. Project Threat Assessment Form complete.
10b. Project Threat Assessment Form incorrectly completed.
10c. Requires Tier 1 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan. Please complete attached form
Requires Tier 2 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan. Requires submittal of Tier 2
SWPPP, payment of processing fee and review by city.
Post-Development (SUSMP) Compliance
/ "?~ XI ft10e. Storm Water Standards Questionnaire complete. — An-ttf*^—*&—to /'"/
10f.
10g.
10h.
10k.
101.
Storm Water Standards Questionnaire incorrectly completed. Please make the
corrections, re-sign the questionnaire and resubmit with next submittal.
Project is subject to Standard Storm Water Requirements. See city Standard Urban
Storm Water Management Plan (SUSMP) for reference.
Disconnect discharges per SUSMP. Do not connect runoff from impervious surfaces to
storm drains without first discharging water over landscape areas. See SUSMP.
Minimize use of impervious surfaces per SUSMP. Redesign to reduce the excessive use
of impervious area (pavement) on project. Use a balanced design of pervious surfaces
(landscape area, planters, etc.) and impervious surfaces. See SUSMP. •
Trash storage areas must be designed per city standards (GS-16) to avoid contact with
storm runoff.
Project is subject to Priority Development Project Requirements.
Prepare and submit a Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP). Requires payment of
processing fee and review by city.
10m. Project does not comply with recommendations of the approved SWMP. Redesign to
comply and resubmit.
E-36 Page 5 of 7 REV 6/30/10
,ST ND2
D
3RD
SITE PLAN
1. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show:
A. North arrow
B. Existing & proposed structures
C. Existing street improvements
D. Property lines (show all dimensions)-
E. Easements
F. Right-of-way width & adjacent streets
G. Driveway widths
H. Existing or proposed sewer lateral
I. Existing or proposed water service
J. Existing or proposed irrigation service
K. Submit on signed /approved plans:
DWG No.
D 2. Show on site plan:
A. Drainage patterns
1. Building pad surface drainage must maintain a minimum slope of one percent towards an
adjoining street or an approved drainage course.
2. ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE: "Finish grade will provide a minimum positive drainage of
2% to swale 5' away from building".
B. Existing & proposed slopes and topography
C. Size, type, location, alignment of existing or proposed sewer and water service(s) that serves
the project. Each unit requires a separate service; however, second dwelling units and
apartment complexes are an exception.
D. Sewer and water laterals should not be located within proposed driveways, per standards.
D 3. Include on title sheet:
A. Site address
B. Assessor's parcel number
C. Legal description/lot number
For commercial/industrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, include: total building
square footage with the square footage for each different use, existing sewer permits
showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing, warehouse, office, etc.) previously
approved.
Show all existing use of SF and new proposed use of SF.
Example:
Tenant improvement for 3500 SF of warehouse to 3500 SF of office.
EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION
Lot/Map No.Subdivision/Tract:Reference no(s):
E-36 Page 2 of 7 REV 6/30/10
DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE
,|ST 2ND 3RD ~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~——^——————
D D D 4a. Project does not comply with the following engineering conditions of approval for project no.
D D D 4b. All conditions are in compliance. Date:
DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS
D D 5. Dedication for all street rights-of-way adjacent to the building site and any storm drain or
utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and for remodels with a
value at or exceeding $ 17.000.00 . pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.030.
For single family residence, easement dedication will be completed by the City of Carlsbad,
cost $605.00.
Dedication required as follows:
Dedication required. Please have a registered civil engineer or land surveyor prepare the
appropriate legal description together with an 8 Yz" x 11" plat map and submit with a title
report. All easement documents must be approved and signed by owner(s) prior to issuance
of building permit. Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the
dedication process. Submit the completed application form with the required checklist items
and fees to the engineering department in person. Applications will not be accepted by mail
or fax.
Dedication completed by: Date:
IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS
6a. All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be constructed
at time of building construction whenever the value of the construction exceeds $ 82.000.00.
pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.040.
Public improvements required as follows:
E-36 Page 3 of 7 REV 6/30/10
,iST 2ND QRD
D 6b. Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad
Municipal Code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title report or current grant
deed on the property and processing fee of $ 441.00 so we may prepare the necessary
Neighborhood Improvement Agreement. This agreement must be signed, notarized and
approved by the city prior to issuance of a building permit.
Future public improvements required as follows:
D HH D 6c. Enclosed please find your Neighborhood Improvement Agreement. Please return agreement
signed and notarized to the engineering department.
Neighborhood Improvement Agreement completed by:
Date:
D D 6d. No public improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or defective improvements
found adjacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction of the city inspector prior to
occupancy.
GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section 15.16 of the
Municipal Code.
EH n 7a. Inadequate information available on site plan to make a determination on grading
requirements. Include accurate grading quantities in cubic yards (cut, fill, import, export and
remedial). This information must be included on the plans.
HH D 7b. Grading Permit required. NOTE: The grading permit must be issued and rough grading
approval obtained prior to issuance of a building permit.
d D 7c. Graded Pad Certification required. (Note: Pad certification may be required even if a grading
permit is not required.) All required documentation must be provided to your Engineering
Construction Inspector. The inspector will then provide the engineering counter with a
release for the building permit.
CH n 7d. No grading permit required.
MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS
D D D 8. A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in city right-of-way and/or private work
adjacent to the public right-of-way. Types of work include, but are not limited to: street
improvements, tree trimming, driveway construction, tying into public storm drain, sewer and
water utilities.
Right-of-way permit required for:
E-36 Page 4 of 7 REV 5/30/10
..ST FEES
D 11. D Required fees have been entered in building permit
Drainage fee applicable
Added square feet
Added square footage in last two years? yes no
Permit No.
Permit No.
Project built after 1980 yes no
Impervious surface > 50% yes no
Impact unconstructed facility yes no
D Fire sprinklers required yes no (is addition over 150' from center line)
Upgrade yes no
D No fees required
WATER METER REVIEW
D D D 12a. Domestic (potable) Use
Ensure that the meter proposed by the owner/developer is not oversized.
Oversized meters are inaccurate during low-flow conditions. If it is oversized, for
the life of the meter, the city will not accurately bill the owner for the water used.
• Where a residential unit is required to have an automatic fire
extinguishing system, the minimum meter size shall be a 1 "meter. NOTE:
The connection fee, SDCWA system capacity charge and the water
treatment capacity charge will be based on the size of the meter
necessary to meet the water use requirements.
• For residential units the minimum size meter shall be 5/8", except where
the residential unit is larger than 3,500 square feet or on a lot larger than
one quarter (1/4) acre where the meter size shall be 3A:
• If owner/developer proposes a size other than the "standard", then
owner/developer must provide potable water demand calculations,
which include total fixture counts and maximum water demand in gallons
per minute (gpm). A typical fixture count and water demand worksheet is
attached. Once the gpm is provided, check against the "meter sizing
schedule" to verify the anticipated meter size for the unit.
• Maximum service and meter size is a 2" service with a 2" meter.
12b. Irrigation Use (where recycled water is not available)
All irrigation meters must be sized by the landscape architect based on the flow
demand in gallons per minute (gpm) for the area to be irrigated. The minimum
size meter(s) shall be capable of supplying the peak irrigation water demand
determined.
• If the project is a newer development (newer than 1998), check the
recent improvement plans and observe if the new irrigation service is
reflected on the improvement sheets. If so, at the water meter station,
the demand in gpm may be listed there. Irrigation services are listed with
a circled "I", and potable water is typically a circled "W".
E-36 Page 6 of 7 REV 4/30/10
If the improvement plans do not list the irrigation meter and the
service/meter will be installed via another instrument such as the building
plans or grading plans (w/ a right of way permit of course), then the
applicant must provide irrigation calculations for estimated worst-case
irrigation demand (largest zone with the farthest reach). Typically the
planning department landscape consultant has already reviewed this if
landscape plans have been prepared, but the applicant must provide the
calculations to you for your use. Once you have received a good
example of irrigation calculations, keep a set for your reference. In
general the calculations will include:
Hydraulic grade line
Elevation at point of connection (POC)
Pressure at POC in pounds per square inch (PSI)
Worse case zone (largest, farthest away from valve)
Total sprinkler heads listed (with gpm use per head)
Include a 10% residual pressure at point of connection
..ST
D D D 12c. Irrigation Use (where recycled water js available)
1. Recycled water meters are sized the same as the irrigation meter above.
2. If a project fronts a street with recycled water, then they should be connecting to this
line to irrigate slopes within the development. For subdivisions, this should have been
identified and implemented on the improvement plans. Installing recycled water
meters is a benefit for the applicant since they are exempt from paying the San
Diego County Water Capacity fees. However, if they front a street on which the
recycled water is there, but is not live (they are charged with potable water until
recycled water is available), then the applicant must pay the San Diego Water
Capacity Charge. If recycled water is eventually supplied to the service connection
and meter within one year of the original application for Water meter Permit, the
customer must prepare and submit the San Diego County Water Authority's
"Capacity Charge Refund Request" form to CMWD for verification to request the
connection fee refund.
D D D 13. Additional Comments:
E-36 Page 7 of 7 REV 4/30/10
STORM WATER n , ,c .Development Services
Engineering Department
CITY OF QUESTIONNAIRE WS Faraday Avenue
760-602.27SO
www.catilsbadca.gov
INSTRUCTIONS:
To address post-development pollutants that may be generated from development projects, the City requires that new
development and significant redevelopment priority projects incorporate Permanent Storm Water Best Management
Practices (BMP's) into the project design per the City's Standard Urban Stormwater Management Plan (SUSMP).
Initially this questionnaire must be completed by the applicant in advance of submitting for a development application
(subdivision, discretionary permits and/or construction permits). The results of the questionnaire determine the level of
storm water standards that must be applied to a proposed development or redevelopment project. Depending on the
outcome, your project will either be subject to 'Standard Stormwater Requirements' or be subject additional criteria
called 'Priority Development Project Requirements'. Many aspects of project site design are dependent upon the
storm water standards applied to a project
Applicant responses to the questionnaire represent an initial assessment of the proposed project conditions and
impacts. City staff has responsibility for waking the final assessment after submission of the development application.
If staff determines that the questionnaire was incorrectly filled out and is subject to more stringent storm water
standards than initially assessed by the applicant, this will result in the return of the development application as
incomplete. In this case, please make the changes to the questionnaire and resubmit to the City.
If applicants are unsure about the meaning of a question or need help in determining how to respond to one or more of
the questions, they are advised to seek assistance from Land Development Engineering staff,
A separate completed and signed questionnaire must be submitted for each new development application submission.
Only one completed and signed questionnaire is required when multiple development applications for the same project
are submitted concurrently. In addition to this questionnaire, applicants for construction permits must also complete,
sign and submit a Project Threat Assessment Form to address construction aspects of the project.
Please answer the questions below, follow the instructions and sign the form at the end.
j. Is your project a significant redevelopment? ; |
DEFINITION:
Significant redevelopment is defined as the, creation, addition or replacement of at least 5,000 square feet of
impervious surface on an already existing developed site.
Significant redevelopment includes, but is not limited to: the expansion of a building footprint; addition to or
replacement of a structure; structural development including an increase in gross floor area and/or exterior
construction remodeling; replacement of an impervious surface that is not part of a routine maintenance activity; and
land disturbing activities related with structural or impervious surfaces. Replacement of impervious surfaces includes
any activity that is not part of a routine maintenance activity where impervious material(s) are removed, exposing
underlying soil during construction.
If your project IS considered significant redevelopment, then please skip Section 1 and proceed with Section 2.
If your project IS NOT considered significant redevelopment, then please proceed to Section 1.
E-34 Page 1 of 3 REV 3/23/10
CITY OF
CARLSBAD
STORM WATER
STANDARDS
QUESTIONNAIRE
E-34
De vetoDrtient Services
Engineering Department
1635 Faraday Avenue
760-602-2750
www.carlsbadca.gov
SECTION 1 NEW DEVELOPMENT
PRIORITY PROJECT WPE
Does you prqjejet nieet one or more of the following criteria:YES NO
1. Housing subdivisions of 10 or more dwelling units. Examples: single family homes, multi-family homes,
condominium and apartmenis
2. Commercial -greater than 1-acre, Any development other than heavy industry or residential. Examples: hospitals;
laboratories and other medioarfacflities; educational institutions; recreational facilities; mUniciparfacilllies; commercial
nurseries; multi-apartment buildings; car wash facilities; mini-malls and other business complexes; shopping malls;
hotels; office buildings; public warehouses; automotive dealerships; airfields; andI other tight industrial facilities.
3. Heavy Industrial / Industry- greaterthan 1 acre. Examples: manufacturing plants, food processing plants, metal
working facilities, printing plants, and Beet storage areas (bus, truck, etc.).
4. Automotive repair shoo. A facility categorized in any one of Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) codes 5013,
. 5014, 5541-, 7532-7534, and 7536-7539
5. Restaurants. Any facility that sells prepared foods and drinks for consumption, including stationary lunch counters
and refreshment stands selling prepared foods and drinks for immediate consumption (SIC code 5812), where Ihe
land area for development is greater than 5,000 square feet. Restaurants where land development is less than 5,000
square feet shall meet all SUSMP requirements except for structural treatment BMP and numeric sizing criteria
requirements and hydromodification requirements,
6. Hillside development Any development that creates 5,000 square feet of impervious surface and is located in an
area with known erosive soil conditions, where the development will grade on any natural slope that is twenty-five
percent (25%) or greater.i<
7. Environmentally Sensitive Area.JjESA)1. All development located within or directly adjacent' to or discharging
directly3 to an ESA (where discharges from the development or redevelopment will enter receiving waters within the
ESA), which either creates 2,500 square feet of impervious surface on a proposed project site or increases the area
of imperviousness Of a proposed project site to 10% or more of its naturally occurring condition.X
8. Parking lot Area of 5^000 square feet or more, or with 15 or more parking spaces, and potentially exposed to urban
runoff
9, Streets, roacls^Jjttlhways, and freeways. Any paved surface that is 5,000 square feet or greater Used for the
transportation of automobiles, trucks, motorcycles; and other Vehicles xf
10. 'Retail Gasoline Outlets. Serving more than 100 vehicles per day and greater than 5,000 square feet
11; Coastal Development Zone. Any project located within 200 feet of the Pacific Ocean and (1) creates more than
2500 square feet of impermeable surface or (2) increases impermeable surface on property by more than 10%.
12. More than 1-acre of disturbance. Project results in the disturbance of more than 1-acre or more of land and is
considered a Pollutant-generating {Development Project4.
1 Environmentally Sensitive Areas include but are nol limited to all Clean Water Act Section 303(d) impaired water bodies; areas designated as Areas of Special
Biological Significance by the State Water Resources Control Board (Water Quality Control Plan: for the San Diego Basin (1894) and amendments); water bodies
designated with the RARE beneficial use by the State Water Resources Control Board (Water Quality Control Plan forthe San piegb Basin (1894) and amendments);
areas designated as preserves or their equivalent under the Multi Species Conservation Program within the Cities and County of San Diego; and any other equivalent
environmentally sensitive areas which have been identified by the Copermittees.
2 "Directly adjacent* means situated within 200 feet of the Environmentally Sensitive Area.
3 "Discharging directly to* means outflow from a drainage Conveyance system that is composed entirely of flows from the subject development or redevelopment site, and
not commingled with flow from adjacent lands.
A Pollutant-generating Development Projects are those projects that generate pollutants at levels greater than background levels. In general, these include all projects
that contribute to an exceedance to an Impaired water body or which create new impervious surfaces greater than 5000 square feet and/or introduce new landscaping
areas that require routine use of fertilizers and pesticides. In most cases linear pathway projects that are for infrequent vehicle use, such as emergency or maintenance
access, or for pedestrian or bicycle use, are not considered Pollutant-generating Development Projects if they are built with pervious surfaces or if they sheet flow to
surrounding :pervioU8 surfaces.
Section 1 Results:
.If you answered YES to ANY of the questions above your project is subject to Priority Development Project requirements. Please Check the
'meets PRIORITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT requirements" box in Section 3. A Storm Water Management Plan, prepared in accorclance with City
Storm Water Standards, must be submitted at time Of application.
If you answered NO to ALL of the questions above, then your project is subject to Standard Stormwater Requirements. Please check the "does
not meet POP requirements" box in Section 3. _^
E-34 Page 2 of 3 REV 3/23/10
CITY OF
CARLSBAD
STORM WATER
STANDARDS
QUESTIONNAIRE
E-34
DevelatJment Services
Engineering Department
1635 Faraday Avenue
760-602-2750
www.carlsbad ea .go v
SECTION 2 SIGNIFICANT REDEVELOPMENT
Complete the questions below regarding your redevelopment project:
1, Project results in the disturbance of more than 1-acre or more of land and is considered a Pollutant-generating
Development Project (see definition In Section 1),
YES NO
X
If you answered NO, please proceed to question 2.
If you answered YES, then you ARE a significant redevelopment and you ARE subject to PRIORITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
requirements. Please check the "meets PRIORITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT requirements" box in Section 3 below.
2. Is the project redeveloping an existing priority project type? (Priority projects are defined in Section 1 )X
If you answered YES, please proceed to question 3.
If you answered NO, then you ARE NOT a significant redevelopment and your project is subject to STANDARD STORMWATER
REQUIREMENTS. Please check the "does not meet POP requirements" box in Section 3 below.
3. Is the project solely limited to just one of the following:
a. Trenching and resurfacing associated with utility work?
b. Resurfacing and reconfiguring existing surface parking lots?
c. New sidewalk construction, pedestrian ramps, or bike lane on public and/or private existing roads?
d. Replacement of existing damaged pavement?
If you answered NO to ALL of the questions, then proceed to question 4.
If you answered YES to ANY of the questions then you ARE NOT a significant redevelopment and your project is subject to Standard
Stormwater Requirements. Please check the "does not meet POP requirements" box in Section 3 below.
4. Will your redevelopment project create, replace, or add at least 5,000 square feet of impervious surfaces on an existing
development or, be located within 200 feet of the Pacific Ocean and (1 )create more than 2500 square feet of
impermeable surface or (2) increases impermeable surface on the property by more than 10%?
If you answered YES, you ARE a significant redevelopment, and you ARE subject to PRIORITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT requirements.
Please check the "meets PRIORITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT requirements" box in Section 3 below.
If you answered NO, then you ARE NOT a significant redevelopment and your project is subject to STANDARD STORMWATER
REQUIREMENTS, Please check the "does not meet POP requirements" box in Section 3 below.
SECTION 3
Questionnaire Results:
a My project meets PRIORITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (POP) requirements and must comply with additional Stormwater criteria
per the SUSMP and must prepare a Storm Water Management Plan for submittal at time of application.
My project does not meet POP requirements and must only comply with STANDARD STORMWATER REQUIREMENTS per the
SUSMP.
Applicant Information and Signature Box Tftis Box lor City Use Only
Assessor's Parcel Numbers):
Applicant Title:
City Concurrence:YES
Dale:
E-34 Page 3 of 3 REV 3/23/10
to.
"o
s
as
<?UJ
ment and MaterialsControl BMPfre MaPolluNoaningConBMBMPnt CSErosion CoBMPsejsB/fl -Bfatioubg
juauidfnbg pus 8p|tp;\
"SKSIBJEig"
UO])eAJ3SUOO J31EM
)9|1}| UJR1Q ttUOJS
6lijtunn3e/\
laiag Seg |aAEjg
SOUSjj })!S
nt Practption-*Best Sl(BM9-WM
J.-WM
Z-SN
E-SN
I.-HL.
Ot-3S
Z-3'S
s-as
s-as
U-Q3
8-03
ort •tivJtyXX
XK
C9'U1
S
I, 8
I If °S £?i*v•-"•i.l&f £
s 1
ifftK
«f*.5t»e; ->g -tf ^ -e ~
I
1
to
£CO
?'SQ?«*ac
III!!
to ti a..i
•Kl*U
1 £ S S CL j2 E
1
en
CM
PLANNING/ENGINEERING APPROVALS
PERMIT NUMBER CB102421 DATE 12/13/10
ADDRESS 2100 COSTA DEL MAR RD
RESIDENTIAL ADDITION- POOL/SPA
MINOR (<17,000.00)
TENANT IMPROVEMENT
RETAINING WALL
COMPLETE OFFICE BUILDING
VILLAGE FAIRE
OTHER SLAB ON GRADE FOR STAIRS
PLANNER VAN LYNCH DATE 12/15/10
ENGINEER DATE
H:\ADMIN\COUNTER/PLANNING/ENGINEERING APPROVALS
BLDG. DEPT COPY
Brenda Wardwell
From: Daryl [kitfire@sbcglobal.net]
Sent: Thursday, December 16,20104:11 PM
To: Brenda Wardwell
Cc: Janet Altar; Raenette Abbey
Subject: CB102421 Recommended for Approval
Attachments: CB102421 RecommendedforApproval.doc
Initial review and recommended for approval $90.
"Thanks,
. James
VarydK. James & Assoc. Inc.
205 CoCina Terrace
Vista, CA. 92084
760-724-7001
Recommended for Approval
Daryl K. James & Associates, Inc.
205 Colina Terrace
Vista, CA 92084
T. (760) 724-7001 Email: kitfire@sbcglobal.net
BLDG. DEPT COPY
Re-Checked by: Darvl K. James
Date: December! 6, 2010
APPLICANT: Victor Salcido JURISDICTION: Carlsbad Fire Department
PROJECT NAME: La Costa PROJECT ADDRESS: 2100 Costa Del Mar Rd.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: CB102421 New Slab on Grade Stair
NO CORRECTIONS - PLAN RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL AS IS.
Januarys, 2011
MEMORANDUM
Project: La Costa Resort Event Terrace Stair
Plan Check Number CB10-2421
Re: Plan Check Corrections based on phone conversation with you on December 22, 2010. Also email and
phone conversations between you and Mike McNeff (structural engineer).
To: Steve Borossay
ITEM
1. Signed plans attached.
3. Revised detail 2/A2.1, also added keynotes #26 and #27 for additional rebar reinforce.
4. Updated keynote #1 on sheet A2.1. existing windows have 3/8" tempered glass. Shown on plans.
END OF PLAN CHECK RESPONSE MEMO
I
STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS
LA COSTA RESORT & SPA
EVENT TERRACE STAIRS
CARLSBAD, CA
Prepared For:
LC TRSf INC.
MEC Project No.: 1050.1
Date Issued: 12/20/10
Revision Dates:
Prepared By:
McNEFF ENGINEERING
& CONSULTING
A (' K <) I I. S S I O N A I i! O K P t.1 K A I I O N
1991 VILLAGE PARK WAY SUITE 115
ENCINITAS, CA 92024
T (760) 479-9838 F (760) 479-9837
www.mcneffengineering.com
' McNeff Engineering & Consulting
1991 Village Park Way
Suite 115
Encinitas, CA 92024
Cantilevered Retaining Wall
Job# 1050Title: La Costa Event Terrace Stairs
Dsgnr:
Project Desc.: CMU Retaining Walls
Project Notes:
fflte'McNeffiMy DocumenKOesignWEC Oesign\2niQ>,1050 La Cosia Adult PooteVENT STAIR CAD\wa)l cate.ec6
ENERCALC, INC, 1983-2010. Ver: 6,1-51, N:48688
License Owner: MCNEFF ENGINEERING S CONSULTING
Description : Terrace Event Stairway Walls -10' max.
Criteria
Retained Height = 10,00ft
Wall height above soil = 0.50ft
Slope Behind Wall = 0.00:1
Height of Soil over Toe = 0.00 in
Water height over heel = 0.0 ft
Vertical component of active
Lateral soil pressure options:
NOT USED for Soil Pressure.
NOT USED for Sliding Resistance.
NOT USED for Overturning Resistance.
Surcharge Loads \
Surcharge Over Heel = 0.0 psf
Used To Resist Sliding & Overturning
Surcharge Over Toe = 0.0 psf
Used for Sliding & Overturning
Axial Load Applied to Stem
Axial Dead Load = 0.0 Ibs
Axial Live Load = 0.0 |bsAxial Load Eccentricity = 0.0 in
Design Summary
Wall Stability Ratios
Overturning = 7.12 OK
Slab Resists All Sliding!
Soil Data
Allow Soil Bearing = 2,000.0 psf
Equivalent Fluid Pressure Method
Heel Active Pressure = 35.0 psf/ft
Toe Active Pressure = 35.0 psf/ft
Passive Pressure = 300.0 psf/ft
Total Bearing Load =.. .resultant ecc. =
Soil Pressure g
Soil Pressure ^
5 Toe
1 Heel
16,098 Ibs
10.82 in
1,946 psf
737 psf
Load Factors
Dead Load
Live Load
Earth, H
Wind, W
Seismic, E
1.200
1.600
1.600
1.600
1.000
Soil Density, Heel
Soil Density, Toe
Footing||Soil Friction
Soil height to ignorefor passive pressure
= 110.00 pcf
0.00 pcf
= 0.400
= 12.00 in
Lateral Load Applied to Stem
Lateral Load = 70.0 plf
...Height to Top = 10.00ft
...Height to Bottom = 0.00ft
The above lateral loadhas been increasedby a factor of
Wind on Exposed Stem =
1.00
0.0 psf
Adjacent Footing Load
Adjacent Footing Load
Footing Width
Eccentricity
WalltoFtgCLDist
Allowable = 0 psfSoil Pressure Less Than Allowable
ACI Factored @ Toe = 2,303 psf
ACI Factored @ Heel = 872 psf
Footing Shear @ Toe = 0.0 psi OK
Footing Shear @ Heel = 94.0 psi OK
Allowable = 94.9 psi
Sliding Calcs Slab Resists All Sliding!
Lateral Sliding Force = 2,975.0 Ibs
Stem Construction
Design Height Above Ftg
Wall Material Above 'HI"
Thickness
Rebar Size
Rebar Spacing
Rebar Placed atDesign Data
fb/FB + fa/Fa
Total Force @ Section
Moment,...Actual
Moment Allowable
Shear Actual
Shear Allowable
Wall Weight
Rebar Depth 'd'
LAP SPLICE IF ABOVE
LAP SPLICE IF BELOW
HOOK EMBED INTO FTG
Masonry Datafm
Fs
Solid Grouting
Modular Ratio 'n'
Short Term Factor
Equiv. Solid Thick.
Masonry Block Type
Masonry Design Method
Concrete Data
f'c
Fy
1.00
0.0 psf
ft ==
=
=
=
=
=
lbs =
ft-l =
ft-l =
psi =
psi =
psf =
in =
in =
in =
in =
psi =
psi =
=
—
=
in ==
=
psi =
psi =
Top Stem
Stem OK
4.00
Masonry
8.00
# 6
16.00
Edge
0.981
1,050.0
2,520.0
2,567.5
15.4
38.7
84.0
5.70
54.00
54.00
1,500
24,000
Yes
21.48
1.000
7.60
3
ASD
l-ootmg lype
Base Above/B<
at Backoff
Poisson's Ratii
2nd
Stem OK
0.00
Masonry
12.00
# 8
8.00
Edge
0.998
2,450.0
9,333.3
9,355.8
21.0
38.7
133.0
9.70
72.00
13.28
1,500
24,000
Yes
21.48
1.000
11.60
0.0 Ibs
0.00ft
0.00 in
0.00ft
Line Load
0.0ft
0.300
McNeff Engineering & Consulting
1991 Village Park Way
Suite 115
Encinitas, CA 92024
Title: La Costa Event Terrace Stairs
Dsgnr:
Project Desc.: CMU Retaining Walls
Project Notes:
Job# 1050
Cantilevered Retaining Wall
tic.*; KWM)$006712w«
Jite McNetM*1 DocumentsUJesignSMEC 1;te5i9n\2Q10\1050 La Costa Adult PocAEVENT STAIR CAOwall cate.ec6 •
ENERCALC. INC. 1983-2010. Ven6.l.S1, N:46688 §
£*««&:%«•»*«
Description : Terrace Event Stairway Walls - 1 0' max.
Footing Dimensions & Strengths
Toe Width
Heel Width
Total Footing Width
Footing Thickness
Key Width
Key Depth
Key Distance from Toe
f'c = 4,000 psiFooting Concrete Density
Win. As %
Cover @ Top 2.00
0,00 ft
12.00
12.00
18.00 in
0.00 in
0.00 in
0.00 ft
Fy = 60,000 psi
1 50.00 pcf
0,0018
@ Btm.= 3.00 in
Footing Design Results
Factored Pressure
Mu' : Upward
Mu' : Downward
Mu: Design
Actual 1 -Way Shear
Allow 1 -Way Shear
Toe Reinforcing
Heel Reinforcing
Key Reinforcing
Toe
2,303
0
0
0
0.00
0.00
= # 7 @ 16.00 in
= #6 @ 16.00 in
= None Spec'd
Heel
872 psf
Oft-l
Oft-l
14,933 ft-l
94.03 psi
94.87 psi
Other Acceptable Sizes & Spacings
Trw Mrvt ron'H KAi i <• C * Cr
Heel: #4@ 7.25 in, #5@ 11.25 in, #6@ 16.00 in, #7@ 21.75 in, #8@ 28.50 in, #9@ 36
Key: No key defined
Summary of Overturning & Resisting Forces & Moments
OVERTURNING
Force Distance Moment
8,871.8
-19.7
4,550.0
Total = 2,975.0 O.T.M. = 13,402.1
Resisting/Overturning Ratio = 7.12
Vertical Loads used for Soil Pressure = 16,098.0 Ibs
Item
Heel Active Pressure
Surcharge over Heel
Toe Active Pressure
Surcharge Over Toe
Adjacent Footing Load
Added Lateral Load
Load @ Stem Above Soil
=
Ibs
2,314.4
-39.4
700.0
3.83
0.50
6.50
RESISTINGForce Distance
Ibs ft
Moment
ft-lb
Soil Over Heel
Sloped Soil Over Heel
Surcharge Over Heel
Adjacent Footing Load
Axial Dead Load on Stem
' Axial Live Load on Stem
Soil Over Toe
Surcharge Over Toe
Stem Weight(s)
Earth @ Stem Transitions
Footing Weight
Key Weight
Vert. Component
Total =
12,100.0 6.50 78,650.0
1,078.0
220.0
2,700.0
0.42
0.83
6.00
448.0
183.3
16,200.0
16,098.0 Ibs R.M.=
* Axial live load NOT included in total displayed, or used for overturningresistance, but is included for soil pressure calculation.
95,481.3
Steve Borossay
From: Steve Borossay
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 1:43 PM
To: 'McNeff Engineering and Consulting - SBC'
Subject: RE: La Costa Event Terrace Stair
Hello Michael;
Your idea of epoxy dowels is a good one; however, cutting back of the existing footing would require structural
calculation, which
You may not want to do.
Steve Borossay,PE
From: McNeff Engineering and Consulting - SBC [mailto:mcneffenqineering@sbcqlobal.net1
Sent: Monday, December 27, 2010 11:52 AM
To: Steve Borossay
Cc: 'Victor Salcido'; Tom McCabe1 .
Subject: La Costa Event Terrace Stair
Good morning Steve-
I left you a voicemail earlier this morning, but email correspondence might be easier for you. We are the structural
engineering consultant assisting with the referenced La Costa project. I understand from the architect that you have
concerns regarding the proposed mat slab footing (beneath the new CMU retaining walls) possibly surcharging the
existing continuous wall footing in an adverse way. Currently, the plans call for the mat slab footing to thicken next to
the existing footing - down to an elevation equal to the bottom of the existing footing. The remainder of the mat slab
will pour over top of the existing footing, with foam separation between the surfaces. This will ensure that the vertical
loads on top of the mat slab will not come down onto the existing footing. The mat slab extension over the existing
footing is only around 7", which is very small compared to the total thickness of the mat slab (18").
My thoughts are that this solution does not unduly surcharge the existing footing. However, we could alternatively call
for the existing footing extension to be demolished, and the mat slab poured straight down against the side of the
footing. Epoxy dowels would connect the old and new footings to tie it all together.
Please advise if the original detail proposed is acceptable based on this explanation, or modifications you would like (e.g.
increased foam thickness, etc.). Or advise if you would like to see the alternative detail described above.
Please call or reply to this email at your earliest convenience; the owner is very anxious to proceed with this work and I
think this is the last remaining plan check item. Thank you in advance for your timely response.
Michael A. McNeff, S.E.
President
McNeff Engineering & Consulting Corp.
1991 Village Park Way
Suite 115
Encinitas CA 92024
(760) 479-9838 t
(760) 479-9837 f
(760) 889-0936 c
www.mcneffengineering.com
Steve Borossay
From: McNeff Engineering and Consulting - SBC [mcneffengineering@sbcglobal.net]
Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2010 9:22 AM
To: Steve Borossay
Cc: Victor Salcido'; Tom McCabe'
Subject: RE: La Costa Event Terrace Stair
Steve -to follow up on our phone conversation last Tuesday: We advised the project architect of the changes we
discussed. These will be shown on their next submitted set. Specifically, the existing footing extension dimension will
be shown (7"), the foam thickness will increase to 2" above the existing footing, the #8 wall rebar will extend into the
thickened portion of the mat slab, and the walls on east and west side of landing will tie together at the top via wall/slab
dowels, and slab reinforcement. The architect will still stamp the drawing; there are numerous architectural elements
associated with the sheet that are not appropriate for us to take professional responsibility for. In this case, we acted as
consultant, but the licensed architect is design professional of record as allowed by CA Business & Professions Code.
Michael A. McNeff, S.E.
President
McNeff Engineering & Consulting Corp.
1991 Village Park Way
Suite 115
Encinitas CA 92024
(760) 479-9838 t
(760) 479-9837 f
(760) 889-0936 c
www.mcneffengineering.com
From: Steve Borossay [mailto:Steve.Borossay@carlsbadca.qov]
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 1:43 PM
To: McNeff Engineering and Consulting - SBC
Subject: RE: La Costa Event Terrace Stair
Hello Michael;
Your idea of epoxy dowels is a good one; however, cutting back of the existing footing would require structural
calculation, which
You may not want to do.
Steve Borossay,PE
From: McNeff Engineering and Consulting - SBC fmailto:mcneffengineering@sbcqlopal.netl
Sent: Monday, December 27, 2010 11:52 AM
To: Steve Borossay
Cc: Victor Salcido1; 'Tom McCabe1
Subject: La Costa Event Terrace Stair
Good morning Steve-
I left you a voicemail earlier this morning, but email correspondence might be easier for you. We are the structural
engineering consultant assisting with the referenced La Costa project. I understand from the architect that you have
concerns regarding the proposed mat slab footing (beneath the new CMU retaining walls) possibly surcharging the
existing continuous wall footing in an adverse way. Currently, the plans call for the mat slab footing to thicken next to
the existing footing - down to an elevation equal to the bottom of the existing footing. The remainder of the mat slab
will pour over top of the existing footing, with foam separation between the surfaces. This will ensure that the vertical
loads on top of the mat slab will not come down onto the existing footing. The mat slab extension over the existing
footing is only around 7", which is very small compared to the total thickness of the mat slab (18").
My thoughts are that this solution does not unduly surcharge the existing footing. However, we could alternatively call
for the existing footing extension to be demolished, and the mat slab poured straight down against the side of the
footing. Epoxy dowels would connect the old and new footings to tie it all together.
Please advise if the original detail proposed is acceptable based on this explanation, or modifications you would like (e.g.
increased foam thickness, etc.). Or advise if you would like to see the alternative detail described above.
Please call or reply to this email at your earliest convenience; the owner is very anxious to proceed with this work and I
think this is the last remaining plan check item. Thank you in advance for your timely response.
Michael A. McNeff, S.E.
President
McNeff Engineering & Consulting Corp.
1991 Village Park Way
Suite 115
Encinitas CA 92024
(760) 479-9838 t
(760) 479-9837 f
(760) 889-0936 c
www.mcneffengineering.com
-^
5
[
4 -i T ^' <
•^TT" > X3
" - x ^j
\HV*
Vg
^H
o
£ i V5
f "s
fc&
^o
^§•
^0?^ ^vi^ijrH * s.-
% ' " »l L V I ^T, en ^3 H r f •. (S4 ^| - t ^.
p
^K-'
^
^^~-x
HI> ^ "i?i> £>: O N»
l£~
3%
»0 N>H C M
2 IB
§
3
>-
^
o
s
•5?"
0