Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2100 COSTA DEL MAR RD; ; CB881057; PermitDECLARATIONSLENDERI I3 g 11 D£ JF I 5 Is- a ° S"ID (D Cfl T3 H.S S. Io 8 9 WORKER S COMPENSATION i r OWNER/BUILDER CONTRACTORo o|-~1!3ra "5°!»°5 lgs SI5S=3 3S§9 "»!S oro 5ave a certitiof Workersthereof (Sec!!§|!p|Is ilisss!l|ip 5-i|l||l=|i:"°^"^~ Ifjllts-fst-=l5?CS2ls|lilsi°=s|cr * .-,_.£ 9 n> ^ n. -lli=^.S-ogSsi.5f?5^o S o n -jft>fo—^ctior —•o £ £ ,0 | re =22i5*o":li|asi;isi">53gS?s'3S'°IsisliHtO ^ ^ 00 jn O O>TJTi5^Oj]>Pils5^Sffilis-<=iosP °ozS-^x^s029"n-,-oiTOtnCDc:32«Ss>:DpSs5i-SS^S>m5J^-i|;3<oxgn^>iz^^S-IH m I & ^ z> O O > I o rn^-n^r-g-nOillig>-|S3;=O > moo -cg5!!5=^- o <-> — ^ ^- ^m > 3 -< o " m>5Z>- °gggz^^,,l?-^i?-i i- > > m -n 5>5omoi§ Slsl5>S3gS»3llz<--?SifOdO^omn §§>"§S5w^<zSiH 35^oSf > C H Z CD _ Z 7-m c/3 a c -Ti o 6Z m — ^^ r~o O <T ^ ^" C OSp|9TjgO O -H Tl n 5 2 -1 -n en -< g O fn H > > S H H mx z Z ° _ x enm a C3 *• cr m -< ^ExpirattoCode shaUautho/izedpeim/t mtraridonpdficialnd vo180sucyfor\ \ tf^t iiI o TJ•o O z o -n Ox S> Z CO >oma>Xm > oomo v5 o CO White — Inspector Green — (1) Finance Yellow — Assessor Pink — Applicant Gold — Temporary File SPECIAL CONDITIONS/*-~^.BUILDING/-^V— •— ^ OCO//~—^••••-~ •',r N ^ •* , £mCI>zC>r/!H~,1A\ j /ELECTRICAL'_ .— «PLUMBINGTlZr--^.^rr§(/*aCrri*srrDCrrvJDtCrr CALL FOR FINAL INSPECTIiOj2i_-•a:rn£IPil33OS~Hm VENTILATING SYSTEMSj]((icc(11c L_ .•c e> '' & **. c". O !. 8 rTl>H>D•)ZDnnn£0-x i t c *• f n0I-52D33m(1"^^QzQ1^\I .j ^jn "i i 3mD>Z«•n>r) i I \ \D BONDING D POOLD ELECTRIC SERVICE D TEMPC3333-<s* / 1 ROUGH ELECTRICS»"»*.X-f1\ v \ f \ "D ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND DcTlTlm33^ 1 _ !ELECTRICALf,. * 1 ,, '» nSHm33ImHm33HCOD>33ZJ>m33 ' QCOHmCO^-minn 7. 3? -TUB AND SHOWER PANXX"* j'"'.. V-- ^ f' OTJ0CnZmnm33x^-»XV•jrf>'"" | en OI z ID (iC[i<C•cC«:r[<:r•J!"s,N^s 4 Z3nV7)13E33^>0n:>-tnD>—Vh/ko:Cty 1 nCOsm33zo030OcTlo0^^_oien J)mzo— , .T PLUMBINGT.mD$m D 2 O 1 ;, 11 ' ' .. -vn0zoDmHm * ^ " V 4rDC3539C:<3rr3xiX3x|T)D/)HH~nZn 5Z~n ^ rHn35DHCo•30<»>^^S..^ccc- n INSULATIONVX^1 T)*> TJr rn") H! [jj 1 (7)(T|o ' , -EXTERIOR LATH^4^KO f< Hm XIU C0 -<o cO -^i "C > '£. "oczo m-im FRAMEIXNL^-rCCZaH Oz ^crT COIm5zoD33OOTlaCOIm33^-a0H O COcCDTl3JmaTlO%X,nFzO£o0o1">znm 1 ^~\GUNITE OR GROUT /o//ijl^-£_w T>rn j oz o133rn m00 m ^0 z "n ^Tj T5 3) Q — 1 > O '"oo o Hm f 1 f ^ >t > P ^ N i ^? $ "c* £ IA ^.,,- ^r' s -^ ^ 1S3&X^1XXs 3ncc 5n C 0in C Jr 1nr c u zwTFTr —c CO Zo — •rr CO , ' 3n21CDncQnnr\O//X</«Nxl1 on3 5T 3 •>31 ) > ' } 3 ) H 5» 5 3]•i)ii3)11/SNfcS FOUNDATION \)~nmr—O CO "Dm O H Oz 33m O 33 D BUILDING- T3mmzcomQ| -I f(S\\-^} * DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING SERVICES DIVISION 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE CARLSBAD, CA 92009-4859 (619)438-1161 MISCELLANEOUS FEE RECEIPT Applicant Please Print And Fill In Shaded Area Only ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO i 0 ~~ / 2L 6 PLAN ID NO. OWNER OWNER'S CITY ZIP TEL 1199 08/10/83 0001 01 Misc VALIDATION AREA 99 »00 CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR'S MAILING ADDRESS CITY ZIP STATE LICENSE NO BUSINESS LICENSE NO FRTMATFn VAIIIATiriN I Q qr/ o- "s -- ' /<t?C3 001-8100000 IF THE APPLICANT TAKES NO ACTION WITHIN 180 DAYS, PLAN CHECK FEES WILL BE FORFEITED LEGAL DESCRIPTION CHECK IF SUBMITTED 2 ENERGY CALCS n^ 2 1987 ENERGY CALCS FOR NON RESIDENTIAL BLDGS DESCRIPTION OF WORK 2 STRUCTURAL CALCS D 2 SOILS REPORTS 2 SELF ADDRESSED ENVELOPES 4«t> DATE GIVEN/ SENT TO APPLICANT DATE CONTACT PERSON LA COSTA LETTER ADDRESS SCHOOL FEE FORM P & E CORRECTIONS LIST CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY APPLICANTS SIGNATURE / DATE White File Yellow - Applicant Pink Finance Gold Assessor FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION RECEIVED f/U> 9•* &• PLAN CHECK NUMBER PROJECT NAME . ADDRESS DATE 1-25- 2100 Coato Do? Mnp Sond PROJECT NO TYPE OF UNIT .UNIT NUMBER COMM Tl CONTACT PERSON. CONTACT TELEPHONE. NUMBER OF UNITS PHASE NO "School .NSPECTED p INSPECTED BY INSPECTED BY DATE INSPECTED DATE INSPECTED DATE INSPECTED APPROVED APPROVED APPROVED DISAPPROVED DISAPPROVED DISAPPROVED COMMENTS Rev 1/86 WHITE Suspense BLUE Water District GREEN Engineering CANARY Utilities PINK Planning GOLD Fire Citp of Carlsbab REQUEST FOR INSPECTION RECORD PERSON TAKING REPORT INSPECTOR __s? ^ OWNE BUILDING , • REINFORCING STEEL 1 MASONRY GROUT GUNITE '_! FLOOR AND CEILING SUB FRAME L' SHEATHING C. ROOF . : SHEAR I ' FRAME " EXTERIOR LATH !/INTERIOR\LATH QR-DRJ^/ALL FINAL ) PLUMBING u UNDERGROUND PLUMBING ;.:.: SEWER AND PL/CO n TOP OUT PLUMBING [_' TUB OR SHOWER PAN 11 GAS TEST n WATER HEATER D SOLAR WATER I- FINAL ELECTRIcfAL IT- TEMPORARY SERVICE " UFFER GROUND ..: ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND P ROUGH ELECTRIC I : POOL BONDING [J ELECTRIC SERVICE LJ FINAL MISCELLANEOUS ri CONDITIONED AIR SYSTEMS I \ SOLAR HEAT LI PATIO :; POOL ~ SPA I 1 SIGN :~; GRADING D DRIVEWAY D FINAL SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS. Ready For Inspection _j Monday DAM ! 1 PM 0\Tuesday D Wednesday Thursday '.'. Friday Cit? of Cartefrab REQUEST FOR INSPECTION RECORD /i^x^ INSPECT! _ OWNER—'W <^^^UZ^^C^gW^^^ ^<^?/2r/}7^^& ^ BUILDING n FOUNDATION D FOOTING D SLAB D REINFORCING STEEL [..I MASONRY D GROUT GUNITE D FLOOR AND CEILING SUB FRAME SHEATHING U ROOF [j SHEAR FRAMJ "^EXTERIOR LATH r INSULATION L: INTERIOR LATH OR DRYWALL ~: FINAL ELECTRICAL n TEMPORARY SERVICE U UFFER GROUND ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND ROUGH ELECTRIC PLUMBING U UNDERGROUND PLUMBING ~ SEWER AND PL/CO D TOP OUT PLUMBING r TUB OR SHOWER PAN r:i GAS TEST ::: WATER HEATER D SOLAR WATER D FINAL SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS. MISCELLANEOUS Li CONDITIONED AIR SYSTEMS n SOLAR HEAT n PATIO :~ POOL n SPA Li SIGN L! GRADING D DRIVEWAY LI FINAL Ready For Inspection n Monday DAM n P M u Tuesday : 1 Thursday D Friday €itj> of Cartebab REQUEST FOR INSPECTION RECORD INSPECTOR OWNER BUILDING •U FOUNDATION C FOOTING L. SLAB D REINFORCING STEEL d MASONRY n GROUT GUNITE D FLOOR AND CEILING SUB FRAME D, SHEATHING H ROOF ~ SHEAR ^ FRAME D EXTERIOR LATH D INSULATION D INTERIOR LATH OR DRYWALL D FINAL ELECTRICAL Z TEMPORARY SERVICE O UFFER GROUND a. ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC D POOL BONDING U ELECTRIC SERVICE D FINAL PLUMBING //? Lff^EHGROUND PLUMBING n SEWER AND PL/CO Q TOP OUT PLUMBING ~ TUB OR SHOWER PAN D GAS TEST ~ WATER HEATER D SOLAR WATER D FINAL MISCELLANEOUS L CONDITIONED AIR SYSTEMS D SOLAR HEAT D PATIO n POOL n SPA n SIGN C: GRADING D DRIVEWAY a FINAL SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS Ready For Insnection D Monday DAM DAPM D Thursday D Friday Citp of Cartebab REQUEST FOR INSPECTION RECORD INSPECTOR ^*""^ l/Cs/?? PERMIT NO A ~V<~ - i /• jT TIME>jrSt> ^ 7 HAT, /o -yj* OWNER /} ,-j ADDRESS . <=* / &-Q ( ^-^C^Tj J^s^^L. V?1>^\_ /t^C. REQUESTED BY ^^l^fe^^ PHONE NO "7-2- ^ - </ */<P if PERSON TAKING REPORT (^L 7' BUILDING D FOUNDATION D FOOTING D SLAB !. 1 REINFORCING STEEL D MASONRY U GROUT GUNITE LJ FLOOR AND CEILING SUB FRAME Z SHEATHING G ROOF Q SHEAR y?C FRAME Z EXTERIOR LATH n INSULATION D INTERIOR LATH OR DRYWALL n FINAL ELECTRICAL D TEMPORARY SERVICE CJ UFFER GROUND D ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND V'ROUGH ELECTRIC D POOL BONDING L ELECTRIC SERVICE G FINAL .PLUMBING "X n-tWDERGRetH»D PLUMBING D SEWER AND PL/CO D TOP OUT PLUMBING D TUB OR SHOWER PAN D GAS TEST Z WATER HEATER H SOLAR WATER n FINAL MISCELLANEOUS D CONDITIONED AIR SYSTEMS D SOLAR HEAT D PATIO ^. POOL D SPA D SIGN ^ GRADING D DRIVEWAY D FINAL SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS . Ready For Inspection n Monday u AM D PM A Tuesday^ D Wednesday n Thursday a Friday dtp of Cartefcao REQUEST FOR INSPECTION RECORD ?f fos7 D FOUNDATION n u u BIMDING') /— It FOOTING H SLAB MASONRY GROUT GUNITE FLOOR AND CEILING SUB FRAME SHEATHING LI ROOF : : SHEAR FRAME EXTERIOR LATH INSULATION INTERIOR LATH OR DRYWALL FINAL TIME DATE *-2~9~rt /i ELECTRICAL -. TEMPORARY SERVICE 3 UFFER GROUND [1 ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND H ROUGH ELECTRIC ~ POOL BONDING •: ; ELECTRIC SERVICE [1 FINAL PLUMBING i .: UNDERGROUND PLUMBING _ SEWER AND PL/CO n TOP OUT PLUMBING r. TUB OR SHOWER PAN ~! GAS TEST :_! WATER HEATER U SOLAR WATER L: FINAL MISCELLANEOUS ~ CONDITIONED AIR SYSTEMS 1. SOLAR HEAT G PATIO :_] POOL D SPA U SIGN I I GRADING C1 DRIVEWAY ~ FINAL SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS. Ready For Inspection r Monday if: AM D PM Tuesday J Wednesday u Thursday Friday Citp of Cartebab REQUEST FOR INSPECTION RECORD INSPECTOR /Wr1 BUILDING D FOUNDATION D FOOTING D SLAB : : REINFORCING STEEL ~ MASONRY ~ GROUT GUNITE D FLOOR AND CEILING SUB FRAME D SHEATHING [ ROOF SHEAR L FRAME '_ EXTERIOR LATH LJ INSULATION D INTERIOR LATH OR DRYWALL n FINAL r/^7 TIME =7T ELECTRICAL E TEMPORARY SERVICE :..: UFFER GROUND •H ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND U ROUGH ELECTRIC n POOL BONDING n ELECTRIC SERVICE D FINAL PLUMBING ( s-^ . SEWER AND PL/CO J TOP OUT PLUMBING n TUB OR SHOWER PAN D GAS TEST L WATER HEATER L SOLAR WATER G FINAL /*- ) '•^ MISCELLANEOUS D CONDITIONED AIR SYSTEMS D SOLAR HEAT LI PATIO 1 1 POOL Z: SPA U SIGN L) GRADING n DRIVEWAY FINAL SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS. Ready For Inspection D Monday DAM H PM U Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Citp of Cartebab yfC?\A <L REQUEST FOR INSPECTION RECORD INSPECTOR/3 >-, / X/*' /PERMIT OWNER(^T^ tf^-ty^t?- ^4/<jL^e- ADDRESS ( - .. <=?< REQUESTED Wr£^£^La^>f C^T^S ^ /. , BUILDING ^^— ( V] FOUNDATION D FOOTING/C SLAB ^-/ — — .- -* j£"*^~ Hi REINFORCING STEEL -7/r [J MASONRY 1' r\/?^7 D GROUT GUNITE f ^xCX-^V* : : FLOOR AND CEILING Sll^FRAME ^^L^[J SHEATHING D ROOF [J SHEAR L FRAME D EXTERIOR LATH D INSULATION U INTERIOR LATH OR DRYWALL n FINAL PLUMBING D UNDERGROUND PLUMBING D SEWER AND PL/CO D TOP OUT PLUMBING D TUB OR SHOWER PAN D GAS TEST Q WATER HEATER r.l SOLAR WATER D FINAL NO. S */^? *£</Z^£#& — -^ *P v .f^i C"""p/L— ^^~~^ — . TIME DATF *-^-*2.f *& 't^^^jfc^^s^L / \ (^g—tZ^&L. X^<^/^X^2^xL^ ^5lftE=NO r/f^^'f' ~ £*£(-S &&• X PERSON TAKING REPQRTxk^8^»O )'J£^^\^ s ELECTRICAL ^XLJ TEMPORARY SERVICE DXUFFER GROUND [..: ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND C/ROUGH ELECTRIC --^^^0 POOL BONDING D ELECTRIC SERVICE ~ FINAL MISCELLANEOUS n CONDITIONED AIR SYSTEMS D SOLAR HEAT D PATIO LT POOL D SPA LJ SIGN H GRADING G DRIVEWAY n FINAL SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS. </ Beady For Inspection n /iyk5nday DAM D PM D Tuesday Wednesday Thursday j - D Friday • EBERHART & STONE, INC. 703, West Taft Avenue « Orange, CA 92665 • 714/921 4810 5205 A^'nida Enemas, Suite C • Carlsbad, CA 92008 • 619/438 9416 MEMO TO wo DATE SUBJECT 'TO-TyT^ MESSAGE f-s /' —/*£'*' t? rt^> " S • /'>i» rssre?/o 2Z /~f¥: *-— ^^/<ff/S /g cst f^ey SIGNATURE • EBERHART & STONE, INC. 733 West Taft Avenue • Orange, CA 92665 • 714/921 4810 5205 Avetiida Enemas, Suite C • Carlsbad, CA 92008 • 619/438 9416 MEMO wo DATE TO SUBJECT MESSAGE ^£- .•rx'/Vv^j^2"^//g»/ ss* yZ.sfS- , /y'g-/' £3r^? rtS*f?- / //«gy Xv^gL / f~ts A~zs r-Jsf ^3"ts '&^5^Z yg -S:v f <f> £• // SIGNATURE * EBERHART & STONE, INC. ' 733 West Taft Avenue • Orange, CA 92665 • 714/921 4810 5205 Avei'lda Enemas, Suite C • Carlsbad, CA 92008 • 619/4389416 MEMO w o DATE TO SUBJECT MESSAGE /)6eS2-/f ?/r^ t^ /ft £>_A , c, fe-i *S •A/e.,^^ j£&i&S /ss?ft/rr<£* /fft gy/gS^^T/ r / X -/ SIGNATURE ESGIL CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO, CA 92 123 (619)560-1468 DATE: JURISDICTION: PLAN CHECK NO:- \ 0 SET;HCT PROJECT ADDRESS; "2100 DgL. >V1 flt£ PROJECT NAME; S-V4-OLO C5S7. O APPLICANT CHECKER QJFILE COPY QUPS P- DESIGNER D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficien cies identified ^s^tjQuO are resolved and D D D checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corp. until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to return to the applicant contact person. {] The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: [| Esgil staff did not advise the applicant contact person that plan check has been completed. Esgil staff been compl* Date conracted: advise applicant that the plan check has Person contacted; Telephone § \ <l) REMARKS <DlN\0-ng OKI FbuK)OA-T\osi te. ^LC AvJv^noviJ Fbo-THixSr Prfvo SOIL. ESGIL CORPORATION DATE: JURISDICTION: PLAN CHECK NO: ESGIL CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 2O8 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) 56O-1468 PROJECT ADDRESS; £ I QQ PROJECT NAME; SET; T)(£~L |T| £ MAPPLICANT FILE COPY QUPS n DESIGNER The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficien- cies identified are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. CTjTi The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. •223 The plans are being held at Esgil Corp. until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to return to the applicant contact person. Wh The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: D D D ov. Esgil staff did not advise the applicant contact person that plan check has been completed. Esgil staff did advise applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted: REMARKS: Telephone #_ By ;\Enclosures ESGIL CORPORATION - ios-7 CA^UCLS* -TO -ho rovL?o>-noy JT"., Qg<. srt\ ig C<DviJ<.\<=»Tl^vi^-r UL? iru u . to OP \Uro 72 '•(2oc?l— o \- Date:Jurisdiction Prepared by: VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE Bldg. Dept Esgil - lo^nPLAN CHECK NO. BUILDING ADDRESS 3\6Q Wlfrfe. APPLICANT/CONTACT M£. BUILDING OCCUPANCY &-"Z, PHONE NO. DESIGNER PHONE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION V - KJ CONTRACTOR PHONE BUILDING PORTION lL.L>6 ft-OO' Air Conditionine Commercial Residential Res. or Comm. Fire Sprinklers Total Value BUILDING AREA TIP'S"*? (£, ^76,^ -76?s-" VALUATION MULTIPLIER 5"5 O^O ~ e *Z< Bo o I.-SD @ VALUE <£o '^H^'/ = ^m-^^ 1:1^-7i f39SV- Building Permit Fee $_ Plan Check Fee $ COM MENTS- SHEET OF 12/87 1 4-»toa \ CO T30) $V > d> > s. 0)+Jroa >. CO T30) SOJ ><ua: <u+-> (0a >• CQ •a 0)Z<u >(V1± D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D a a a a nan Date 6-/S-Q& ENGINEERING CHECKLIST LEGEND Plan Check No. 09 Project Address • 2100 D£<~ W&e. Project Name ^/a CQSTA Field Check Date © 1,2,3 Item Complete Item Incomplete Your Action - Needs By Number in circle indicates plancheck number that deficiency was identified LEGAL REQUIREMENTS Site Plan 1. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show North arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way width and dimensioned setbacks. 2. Show on Site Plan Finish floor elevations, elevations of finish grade adjacent to building, existing topographical lines, existing and proposed slopes, driveway and percent (%) grade and drainage patterns. 3. Provide legal description of property. H. Provide assessor's parcel number. PERMITS REQUIRED Grading 5. Grading permit required. (Separate submittal to Engineering Department required for Grading Permit). 6. Grading plans in plan check PE . 7. Need the following completed prior to building permit issuance A. Grading plans signed. B. Grading permit issued. C. Grading completed. D. Certification letter and compaction reports submitted. E. Grading inspected and permit signed off by City Inspector. 8. Right-of-Way Permit required for work in public right-of-way (e.g., driveway approach, sidewalk, connection to water main, etc). 9. Industrial Waste Permit application required. To be filled out completely and returned to Development Processing. FEES REQUIRED D a ana nan a D a D a D a a REMARKS 10. Park-m-Lieu fees required. Quadrant — Fee Per Unit 11. Traffic impact fee required. Fee Per Unit , Total Fee 12. Bridge and Thoroughfare fee required. Fee Per Unit , Total Fee 13. Public facilities fee required. 14. Facilities management fee required. Fee 15. Additional EDU's required Sewer connection fee Total Fee Sewer permit no. 16. Sewer lateral required O.K. to issue Date If you have any questions about any of the above items identified on this plan check, please call the Development Processing Department at 438-1161. •> \ ' V (0Q CO •Q 9) 30) > <D l± I <U nO m •Q <o5 OJ >OJa: (U nQ CQ T3 S0) > 0) (£ =«==tt==*t= u u uQ. a. a. an a tzf n n QX n n /0 n n nan PLANNING CHECKLIST Plan Check No.Address ZJOO Cosrn Type of Project and Use Zone £-Z £loe Setback Front Q< ___ Facilities Management Zone (p School District San Dieguito Carlsbad Discretionary Action Required Environmental Required Landscape Plan Required Comments Use Allowed? YES Side C£ Rear Of NO Encmitas YES YES YES San Marcos NO NO A NO (X Type Coastal Permit Required Additional Comments YES NO OK TO ISSUI DATE 2560 ORION WAY City of Carl^baD DA^C1 CARLSBAD, CA 92008 F/fl£ DEpARTM£NT TELEPHONE (619)931-2121 DISAPPROVED PLAN CHECK REPORT APPROVED PLAN CHECK# PROJECT £/\ fQ<^SA A=>7x-)x < S'£<../{-> ADDRESS X ITX J /',-^^T'A l\.'7 I'l ARCHITECT ^/-.A^-v? ~ jT /l^ A^-. . r~ ADDRESS /^W / -? f^A^J PHONE OWNER ^A flo'^r/i -/^oy/z cr ^^f\ ADDRESS /?rtfil ^7^ A ^ PHONE OCCUPANCY BZ CONST ""S^A-/ TOTAL SO FT t >ff71 STORIES "Q-SPRINKLERED \ APPROVAL OF PLANS IS PREDICATED ON CONFORMING TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS AND/OR MAKING THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND PERMITS 1 Provide one copy of floor plan(s), site plan, sheets 2 Provide two site plans showing the location of all existing fire hydrants within 200 feet of the project 3 Provide specifications for the following Vv 4 Permits are required for the installation of all fire protection systemsJspi'inlOers, stand pipes, dry chemical, halon, COz, alarms, hydrants) Plan must be approved by the fire departmeTTrjpFibr folnstallation 5 The business owner shall complete a building information letter and return it to the fire department FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT NX 6 The following fire protection systems are required ' -EDLAutomatic fire sprinkler's (Design Criteria -/^v--/x- ~> -> A /)^ D Dry Chemical, Halon, COz (Location '_L I! / D Stand Pipes (Type D Fire Alarm (Type/Location ) 7 Fire Extinguisher Requirements ,sS.One-'2A rated ABC extinguisher for each t-> ftv'V^) sq ft or portion thereof with a travel distance to the nearest / extinguisher not to exceed 75 feet of travel D An extinguisher with a minimum rating of to be located D Other - ~ 8 Additional fire hydrant(s) shall be provided EXITS . 9 Exit doors shall be openable from the inside without the use of a key or any special knowledge or effort .10 A sign stating, " This door to remain unlocked during business hours" shall be placed above the mam exit and doors fx i£o i-'"vi t jt "i /1 i~> i ,\ /-. / AJ /) ,f-s\~n A if— ~~n~, JT l}r~ A /') fZ,/it 7~C .11 EXIT signs (6" x 3A" letters) shall be placed over all required exits and directional signs located as necessary to clearly indicate the location of exit doors GENERAL .12 Storage, dispensing or use of any flammable or combustible liquids, flammable liquids, flammable gases and hazardous chemicals shall comply with Uniform Fire Code .13 Buildmg(s) not approved for high piled combustible stock Storage m closely packed piles shall not exceed 15 feet in height, 12 feet on pallets or in racks and 6 feet for tires, plastics and some flammable liquids If high stock pil- ing is to be done, comply with Uniform Fire Code, Article 81 .14 Additional Requirements lit r~s\ 9.3 t--'V )n... \f- .15 Comply with regulations on attached sheet(s) /Plan Eva"""" " — £--* .--. .^/. —/ • Kf Report mailed to architect Metwith : Attach to Plans 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE $1 $&& , E| TELEPHONE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92009 4859 liK^W i? Jlf (619)4381161 Office of the City Engineer 0f (Harlsbab DATE: AUGUST 11. Fred Rowlen ENCINA WATER POLLUTION CONTROL FACILITIES 6200 Avenida Enemas Carlsbad, CA 92009 INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT APPLICATION NO. ±?3/ Enclosed is a copy of the application for an Industrial Waste Discharge Permit from the subject applicant. Your review and recommendations on this application will be appreciated prior to the issuance of a waste disposal permit. LLOYD B. HUBBS City Engineer LBH:SEE:lch Enclosure: Application No. i5~3'~7 c: Building Department Jack Thomas, Department of Public Works Arnie Wing, Department of Health Services COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL APPLICATION FORM FOR INDUSTRIAL WASTE DISCHARGE PERMIT CITY OF CARLSBAD APPLICATION: NEW (CHECK ONE) REVISED BUILDING P.C. NO.; " %$ /Q57 APPLICATION NO.:£37 INDUSTRIAL CLASS: DATE; ignature of City Representative APPLICATION FOR INDUSTRIAL WASTE DISCHARGE PERMIT A. GENERAL: APPLICANT: SITE ADDRESS: TYPE OF BUSINESS; APPLICANT'S ADDRESS; B. WASTES AND PROCESSING: (Check where applicable) Domestic Waste Only |~| Industrial Waste |~| Industrial Waste NOT Discharged to Sewer Discharged to Sewer GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WASTE (Chemical and Physical Characteristics of proposed waste): _ GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROCESS (If Applicable):_ C. WASTES TO BE DISCHARGED TO SEWER: WASTE:TREATED: (Check One) UNTREATED? APPLICANT OR REPRESENTATIVE OF FIRM: TITLE: QUANTITY: AVERAGE (Daily) MAXIMUM GPD GPD (Gallons Per Day) S IGNATURE ; (Print) DATE: <^> / UNIVERSAL STRUCTURES STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANT 2770 Via De La Valle Del Mar, CA 92014 (619)259-6122 September 21, 1988 Mr. Mike Straub, Contractor 2956 Roosevelt St., #5 Carlsbad, Ca. 92008 729-4484 Subject: Foundation Fill at Locker Room Addition La Costa Tennis Club Dear Mike: Upon your request, the project structural engineer from this office conducted field inspections at the subject structures in your presence on September 19 and 21, 1988 to observe the exposed retaining wall and excavations. Since the soil report by Eberhart & Stone, Inc. requires that new foo- tings be set on competent terrace deposits, all excavations have reach an average depth of 71 below the natural grade. In order to provide a sound base, we recommend that slurry mix of two sacks of cement be poured to the bottom of all footings. In addition, vertical dowels of #3 x 2' long at 18" on centers shall be provided to connect footings and the slurry mix base. Since yours Wan K. Young, S Principal Engi STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS FOR Locker Room Addition At La Costa Tennis Club Prepared for! ROBERT F. ARDENT, ARCHITECT 1015 Chestnut Ave. Suite A2 Carlsbad, Ca 92008 (619) 434-4525 OWNER: La Costa Tennis Club Prepared by:UNIVRRSAL STRUCTURES 2770 Via De La Vail* Del Mar, CA 92014 (619)259-6122 Date-July 29, 1988 w.- V-*47^, ^ fa \/~ :^'f 8 -Y ^p<J*/0 %4>xCL& rtiCo.c. UNIVERSAL STRUCTURESSTRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANT 2770 Vli D« Li V«ll«Del Mar. CA 920HSHEAR WALL SCHEDULE EBERHART & STONE. INC. DAN R EBERHART CEG GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS GERALD L STONE. RCE 733 WEST TAFT AVENUE • ORANGE, CA 92665 • (714) 921 4810 5205 AVENIDA ENCINAS, SUITE C • CARLSBAD, CA 92008 • (619) 438-9416 W.O. 1308 September 14, 1988 Esgil Corporation 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 San Diego, California 92123 Attention: Jim Gilshian Subject: Foundation plan review, locker room addition, La Costa Tennis Club, La Costa Resort, Carlsbad, California. References: Correction List, Shower and Locker Addition, 2100 Costa del Mar Road, Carlsbad, California, by Esgil Corporation, dated August 19, 1988 (Plan Check No. 88-1057). Foundation Plan and Details, Locker Room Addition, La Costa Tennis Club, Carlsbad, California, by Robert F. Ardent Architect, dated August 8, 1988 (Job 88-104). Geotechnical Investigation, Tennis Clubhouse Building Addition, La Costa Resort, Carlsbad, California, by this firm, dated May 3, 1988 (W.O. 1308). Geologic and Seismic Investigation, La Costa Resort Expansion, Carlsbad, California, by this firm, dated April 24, 1984 (W.O. 1308). Gentlemen: Pursuant to your request, this firm has reviewed the referenced foundation plan and details to compare the geotechnical aspects with the intentions of the referenced reports. In addition, a response to the referenced correction list is included herein. Proposed Retaining Wall The following geotechnical parameters may be utilized in the preliminary design of the proposed retaining wall foundation and are based on embedment of the foundation at least 18 inches into competent terrace deposits: 0 An allowable vertical soil bearing pressure of 1,500 pounds per square foot. 0 An allowable lateral soil pressure of 200 pounds per square foot, per foot of embedment, for computing resistance to lateral loads. 0 A friction factor of 0.3 for computing resistance to sliding. -f Esgil Corporation -2- W.O. 1308 It has been brought to this firm's attention that an imported granular material is to be utilized as backfill behind the proposed restrained retaining wall. The following parameters may be utilized in the preliminary design of the wall for backfill consisting of one of the compacted granular materials (compacted onsite soil should be placed within the upper one foot below top-of-wall ) : Equivalent Fluid Backfill Material Backfill Condition Pressure (pcf) Class 2 permeable filter material Level 50 3/8-inch pea gravel Level 55 Clean sand, S.E.=30 mm. Level 60 The wall should be water-proofed to mitigate the migration of moisture. A backdram system is also considered necessary and should consist of a 4-mch-diameter perforated P.V.C. pipe encased in either Class 2 permeable filter material or 1/2-inch to 3/4-inch gravel wrapped in approved filter fabric. The filter material should extend a minimum of one horizontal foot behind the base of the wall and upward at least one foot. The footing excavation and backcut for the proposed retaining wall should be reviewed by the geotechnical consultant to verify the anticipated conditions. When the actual backfill material to be utilized is known, representative samples should be submitted to this firm's laboratory for testing and analysis. Subsequent to the laboratory testing and engineering analysis, specific recommendations for the material selected would be provided. The proposed retaining wall is to be tied into an existing retaining wall. The construction parameters of the existing retaining wall are not known by this firm (type of bearing soil, footing embedment, backfill parameters, drainage conditions, etc.). If records of the existing wall exist, they should be reviewed by the concerned parties. Concrete Slabs -On -Grade Due to a potential expansion of Medium for the onsite near -surf ace soil, concrete slabs-on-grade should be reinforced with minimum 6"X6", #6X#6 welded wire fabric, or with No. 3 bars at 24" on center each way. The recommended presaturation moisture of the subgrade soil should penetrate to a depth of 24". The moisture content should be tested by the geotechnical con- sultant within 24 hours prior to the placement of concrete. The base course beneath concrete slabs-on-grade should be a minimum of 4" thick (including the visqueen-type moisture barrier). (The above recommendations are based on site soil expansion and should not preclude more restrictive structural or agency requirements). EBERHART & STONE, INC. Esgil Corporation -3- W.O. 1308 Summary This firm has reviewed the referenced foundation plan and details and has found them to be consistent with the intentions of the referenced reports, orovided that the contents of this letter are incorporated into the project design and construction practice. The recommendations within the referenced reports remain valid for this project. Recommendations in this letter are opinions based upon this firm's field observations, laboratory testing, previous geotechnical reports, and professional judgment, and have been developed in accordance with generally accepted soil engineering and geologic principles and practices. No Warranty is expressed nor implied. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact the undersigned. Respectfully submitted, EBERHART & STONE, INC. R. Eberhart Gerald L. Stone President Vice President CE6 965 RCE 32233 Exp. 12-31-88 DRE:6LS:na (65) Distribution: (2) Addressee (6) La Costa Construction, Attn: Mr. Les Vaughn EBERHART & STONE. INC. EBERHART & STONE, INC. GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS 2211 E WINSTON ROAD SUITE F« ANAHEIM CA 92806* (714) 991-01 63 5205AVENIDAENCINAS SUITE C• CARLSBAD CA92008»(619)438-9416 DAN R EBERHART CEG GERALD L STONE RCE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION TENNIS CLUBHOUSE BUILDING ADDITION LA COSTA RESORT CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA W.O. 1308 May 3, 1988 Prepared For: La Costa Hotel & Spa 2100 Costa Del Mar Road Carlsbad, California 92008 La Costa W.O. 1308 TABLE OF CONTENTS TEXT REPORT ON INVESTIGATION Purpose and Scooe Page 1 Proposed Construction Page 1 Site Description Page 1 Field Investigation Page 1 Subsurface Conditions Page 2 OPINIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Grading Page 3 Foundations Page 3 Bearing Value Expansive Soil Guidelines Foundation Excavations Foundation Plan Review Page 4 Summary Paae 4 APPENDIX References A-l Description of Laboratory Tests A-2 Unified Soil Classification Plate A Descriptive Log of Trench Excavation Plate B-l Summary of Laboratory Test Results Table I Guidlines For Foundations Based on Soil Expansion Table II Location Map Plate 1 Site Plan Plate 2 EBERHART & STONE, INC. La Costa -1- W.O. 1308 REPORT ON INVESTIGATION PURPOSE AND SCOPE Presented herein is a report on this firm's geotechnical investigation for the proposed addition to the Tennis Clubhouse at the La Costa resort. The purpose of this investigation was to determine the nature of the earth materials underlying the site in consideration of the nroposed construction. The scope of the investigation included the following: 0 Review of this firm's geologic and seismic investigation for the La Costa resort expansion 0 Exploratory trenching 0 Selective samoling 0 Laboratory testing 0 Geotechnical evaluation 0 Preparation of this report This report is to be utilized by the project architect and structural engineer in conjunction with the Geologic and Seismic Investigation for the resort expan- sion, prepared by this firm, dated April 24, 1984. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION No grading is indicated for the proposed addition to the Tennis Clubhouse. A two-story, wood-framed, slab-on-grade structure is proposed. Light structural loading is anticipated. SITE DESCRIPTION The site presently consists of a landscaped grass area westerly of the existing Tennis Clubhouse. An existing 2:1 (horizontal :vertical) fill slope, approxima- tely 7 feet in height, ascends north of the site. An existing S.D.G.E. line runs in a north-south direction and is located beneath and adjacent the western edge of the proposed structure. FIELD INVESTIGATION The subsurface geotechnical conditions were explored by this firm by excavating one backhoe trench in the area of the proposed addition on April 14, 1988. The location of the trench is indicated on the enclosed Preliminary Site Plan, Plate 1. EBERHART & STONE, INC. La Costa -2-W.O. 1308 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Exploration indicates that the materials underlyinq the proposed Tennis Clubhouse addition consist of artificial fill to a depth of 4i feet. The fill is underlain by non-marine terrace deposits to the depths explored. The artificial fill encountered consists of fine to medium grained reddish brown sandy clay/clayey sand, which was very moist and soft. The in situ relative these materials is about 80% of the laboratory standard. These considered to have a potential expansion of Medium. compaction of materials are The non-marine terrace deposits consist of fine silty sand that is moist and medium dense. The upper li feet of this deposit consist of silty clay with fine sand, which is very moist and soft to firm. Ground water was not encountered during the exploration for the proposed Tennis Clubhouse building addition. EBERHART & STONE, INC. La Costa -3- W.O. 1308 OPINIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Recommendations in this report are based upon this firm's field investigation, previous exploration and testing, and professional judgment. Opinions and recommendations are applicable to the proposed building addition under the pur- view of this report, and should be incorporated into project design and construction practice. GRADING Grass and existing landscape vegetation should be removed from the building area and wasted from the site. Based on the site plan, the existing drain pipes and Edison line should be located and removed from the proposed building area. FOUNDATIONS The following recommendations have been developed for the proposed two-story Tennis Clubhouse addition. Wood-framed, slab-on-grade construction yielding light structural loading is anticipated. Excavations for continuous or square pad footings are recommended to extend through the artificial fill and have a minimum IS-mch embedment into competent terrace deposits. Based upon the proposed construction, the embedment of footings into competent terrace deposits, and the anticipated light structural loading, post- construction settlement should be within generally accepted tolerable limits. Based on soluble sulfate content of the onsite materials, Type II and/or Type V cement should be utilized in concrete for foundations. The proposed structure should be designed to resist seismic forces in accordance with cnterra contained in the 1985 Uniform Building Code for seismic Zone 4. Bearing Value For preliminary design ourposes, an allowable bearing value of 1500 pounds per square foot, based on an embedment of 18 inches into competent terrace deposits, may be used for continuous footings and square pad foundations. This value is for dead-load plus live-load conditions and may be increased by one-third in consideration of wind or seismic loadings of short duration. In designing to resist horizontal soil loadings, a lateral bearing resistance of 200 pounds per square foot, per foot of embedment, and a friction factor of 0.3 may be.utilized for foundations embedded in competent terrace deposits. Expansive Soil Guidelines The potential expansion of the near-surface material at the building addition site is Medium. Guidelines for foundations based on soil expansion are pre- sented in Table II. EBERHART & STONE, INC. La Costa -4-W.O. 1308 Foundation Excavations Foundation excavations should be observed by the geotechnical consultant prior to the placement of forms, reinforcement, and concrete to verify the minimum embedment into competent terrace deposits. If uniform bearing materials are not encountered, sone excavations may require deepening. FOUNDATION PLAN REVIEW When the foundation and construction plans have been prepared, they should be provided to the geotechnical consultant for review and comment. Specific foun- dation recommendations and design parameters for retaining walls, if any, will be provided at that time. SUMMARY The opinions and recommendations presented in this report are based uoon site conditions as they existed at the time of this firm's current investigation and orevious reports. This firm's opinions and recommendations are further based upon laboratory testing, exoenence with similar projects, and professional judgment. No warranty is expressed nor implied. This report is subject to review by the controlling governmental body. Respectfully submitted, EBERHART & STONE, INC. Robert J. Fulton Project Geologist RJF:DRE:GLS:pm (52) "Dan R. Eberhart President CEG 965 Stone Vice President RCE 32233 Exp. 12-31 -f EBERHART & STONE, INC. W.O. 1308La Costa A-l REFERENCE Geolooic and Seismic Investigation, La Costa Resort Expansion Carlsbad, California, by Eberhart & Stone, Inc., dated Aonl 24, 1984 (W.O. 1308). EBERHART & STONE, INC. La Costa W.O. 1308 A-2 DESCRIPTION OF LABORATORY TESTS Classification Field classifications were verified in the laboratory by visual and tactile identification. Soils have been classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System. Moisture-Density Moisture-density determinations were conducted on relatively undisturbed sam- ples. The results are presented within the Trench Log. Maximum dry density and optimum moisture were determined in accordance with ASTM D1557-70 and are presented in Table I. Direct Shear A derect shear test was conducted on a remolded sample. The sample was tested in brass rings with 2.5-mch inside diameters. The rate of strain used was 0.05 in./mm. The soecimens were inundated for approximately 24 hours under normal loads and durma shearing. The results are oresented in Table I. Potential Expansion A determination of potential soil expansion was made on a selected sample in accordance with ASCE Expansion Index Test (UBC Standard 29-2). The result is presented in Table I. Sulfate Content A determination of soluble sulfate content was made on a selected sample, by Soil and Plant Laboratory, in accordance with California Method of Test No. 417A. The result is presented in Table I. EBERHART & STONE, INC. Unified Soil Classification (Including Identification and Description) Major Division* 1 3«** oZ cMM, /E| a3 x?-•;.:5-3 - «• =«.-;iS S e 28s £ 3- «« «•a ? 2 »c SU -s::? s^:?: **— ^ > > «t— -> w-s.s-6-5 2*°s> 6s £5o SS• vZ « S52 *s- £"**wJ3 «** = ".-3^ 1 av:s ss•5.S5 ^i 1»eo^J 5-3 g_*'— c •^ U.-***** S1111-J <• **^ 1.w 2-di GroupSrmhol J CW GP CM GC sw SP Typical Namn 4 Well graded f raveli travel sand mim lures little or no fines. Poorly traded gravels gravel-sand mixturn, little or no fines. Silly gravel*, travel «and iiU mixtures. Clayey travels, travel sand-clay mix-tures Welt traded sands, gravelly sands, littleor no nne*. Poorly traded sands, gravelly sands. Field Identification Procedure*(Excluding particles larger than J inche*and basing fractions on estimated weight*) I Wide rant* in (ram tun and substantial amount* of all intermediate particle SIMS Predominantly on* sue or a ranee of u«e»with some intermediate sites mining Nonplastic fines or fines with low plasticity(for identification procedures tec ML below) Plastic fine* (for identification procedure* seeCL below). Wide range in (ram «»es and substantialamounts of ail intermediate particle siacs. Predominantly one size or a range of sue* •& H I I o C X~ i • = c "* V u « SC little or no hnc*. Silly sands, tand silt mixture*. Clayey Mnds, sand<lajr mixtures. wttk soro* intermediate site* missini. Nonplaatic fines or fines with low plasticity(for identification procedures sec ML below) Plastic fine* (for identification procedure* seeCL below) B * I 1 = a I III I IlNmS 2 ojn*!• ^C jj a It l i-= i. t/5 J ^s C g! S 'I• 3 I 1 Jl 10 < 3 e ± v :i i!» • Highly Organic Soil* ML CL OL MH CH OH Pt Inorganic silt* and very fine sands rock flour iilty or clayey fine sands orclarey silts with slight plasticity Inorganic clay* of low to medium plas- ticity gravelly clays sandr clays,silly clars. lean clays. Organic nits and organic silly clays of low plasticity Inorganic sill* micaceous or diatoma:eous fine sandy or silly soils, elasticlilts Inorganic clays of high plaaticity. fatclays Organic clay* of medium to high plaa-ucity. organic silt*. 'eat and other highly organic soil*. Identification Procedureson Fraction Smaller than No 40 Sirve Size Dry Strength(Crashingcharacteristic*) None to slight Medium to high Sli«ht tomedium Slight tomedium High to veryhigh (edtum to high Oilatancy(Reactionto shaking) Quick tcTslow None to veryslow Slow Slow to none None None to very*low Toughness(Consistencynear PL) None Medium Slight Slight tomedium High Slight tomedium Readily identified by color odor iponfy feeland frequently by fibrous texture (1) Boundary clastincations Soils possessing characteristic! 01 two group* are designated by coraUnations ol group symbol*. for example GW GC. well graded gravel sand mixture with clay binder 12} All sieve site* on this chart arc U S standard. CONSISTENCY CLASSIFY Gronular CohesiveSoil Soil Loose Soft Medium Dense Firm Dense Stiff Hard VTION Bedrock Soft Moderately Hard Hard Very Hard EBERHART S STONE INC. GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS nil EAST WINSTON NOAO SWTI f • AMAHEIM CALIFOHNIA MMM w.o. 1308 (DATE: 5-3-88 1 PI ATT A Moisture Condition Dry Damp Moist Very Moist Wet SP - Standard Penetrationsampler R - Relatively Undisturbedsample B - Bulk Sample V - Stabilized Ground water O ~" Groundwater Seepage • _•_ - Blow count for 6" • intervals 12 - Blow count for 12" interval La Costa W.O. 1308 DESCRIPTIVE LOG OF TRENCH EXCAVATION U.S.C.S. Trench No. Depth (ft.) Symbol Field Description 1 0 0.5 1.5 - 0.5 - 1.5 - 4.5 SM CL CL Fill: Silty sand, fine grained, dark brown to black, very moist, medium dense. Sandy clay, mottled, red-brown to gray- brown, very moist, firm, desiccated. Silty clay, with trace of fine sand, 4.5 - 6.0 6.0 - 8.0 mottled, gray-brown, very moist, soft to firm; 9 2.5', 108 pcf 9 16%. CL Terrace Deposits: Silty clay, mottled, orange to gray-brown, moist, firm, trace of fine sand; 9 5.0', 104 pcf 9 20%. SM Silty sand, fine grained, yellow-brown, moist, dense, micaceous, trace of caliche, Total depth 8.0 feet No ground water No caving Plate B-l EBERHAKT & STONE, INC. o>-i Xto LLJZ Q<C ZQ. 1—1X LQo <: o2= i—i (71UJ OC. t— tt)__| UJ <_) -OO h- 1-1 —Z Z Q£<C •-• U- O O »*-•-1 (/> tO Q. o «_>U tO oin of. z: oc t-H CO I- 1-HO- Oo s: CM LO•in CO o:oCO<c O •—i «*-• to oX Z Q. O CM OC\J o 00 o >- to LU0. 03to Q (0 Ct— i— «3 <_)<_) 00 •o •»->•»•> C •— i— (O r- i- toC_)to to a. -M UJ <+-o »—' C\Ji LO I Lf> CM COI O I— <t1/1 CJLU X IQ_ 1-00omr*q5 •*• 3£ < 1- 0 1- (/)UJ 1- 0z (0 ^VI 0 U reJ to»_ i t preclude more restrictive structuinforced concrete foundations, postineer, may be utilized.ed on site soil expansion and should noAs an alternative to conventionally reisystems, designed by a structural engThese guidelines are basor agency requirements,tensioned structural slab^^ — %*-»rtlV<uu(015.«j)*•>(U(J8«*.o (U§ 'J JS*•> •«-•< *0) T3 •(0 (A1. .*ild be measured below lowest adjacent gId be moist and free of desiccation craciFooting embedments shoufooting excavations shoul^^ <N £4->garage entrances, with similar depade beam should be constructed acrossacent perimeter footings.A reinforced concrete grand reinforcement as adj^-*ro to*+rf isolated spread footings and /or paexpansion greater than "Low", interior•ecommended..2 *- 1 =*-> HI9 £CL re CO M si !! O t-« 5 »• c£l ^-mif T3(UC(D2 c£ o'coh_ c e recommended moisture should penehould be tested by the geotechnicapresaturation of slab subgrade isnum moisture conditions should be iecommended beneath interior slabs, themeter footings. The moisture content sr to the placement of concrete. ThoughLow and Low expansion potentials, optiror to the placement of slab concrete.Where presaturation is rto the depth of the perilconsultant 24 hours prioa requirement for Veryor reestablished just pri^^I/) 2-o§3%£W -C , a visqueen-type moisture barrierand cover. This moisture barrier J-grade in areas to be tiled or carpeted,be overlain by one inch of protective sir sealed at splices.?^5 151«•§!•n v- *-a; cn « VI > I**e* =°-S > s ™ s J Q-JZ "«5 o> «m JD .a ^^strt«O •M?-on> C1/1 n>in should consist of pea gravel, cleantant. The above moisture barrier/ibase course thickness.recommended beneath interior slabs, itlal acceptable to the geotechnical consul3e included as part of the recommendedWhere a base course isor other granular matericover requirement may 1•^i ^Id be supported at mid-slab height.Slab reinforcement shou!^^ oo n"Zit-slab reinforcement may be omittedor jointed for crack control.<u tiff3 fc*°% - 2!<A hen ra C M '£ Si§10 *_ 'W E 2 2- «*• *. « JS«5 **a «(U TJ »•> HJS .a-o Garage slabs should becracking can be tolerate»I«Ho> T3<O** r>sO hould be free-floated or structuralle placement of No. 3 bars @ 24" O.W £+••(Aja >» . "^•Sw-o J2 s 0) « = "O <D §15 ^2c «£ ^•°^ *"o gu "5 ^~ 38s l>6<-< 1 «lw b: J3 c 2 «»JO tj S-2S, 0) *- C U) ^For soil with a potentialto perimeter footings,bent from perimeter foo*•••» 0 CJ>uJ-•ss.oCOoaC£UJ COUJ LOCATION MAP APPROXIMATE SITE LOCATION > • *.1sir'• -'.\/ / '*k£ J'-/ feet From U.S.C.S. Encinitas, CA 7.5 Minute Quadrangle La Costa Hotel & Spa • tTOMC IMC. CEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS ??1 I (AST WINSTON NOAO SUITE f . AM A HE I M CALIFORNIA »2«O WO 1308 DATE 5-3-88 SITE LOCATION I PLATE: I 11VM ONINIV13U 9NI1SIX3- ^tw*.-— - : - - ",«••••."•' !- '• ,; v'^v' •" \v:. v;'r.V \?'A;V^^II^:?%:;A^'^.:I v.;j/\-^v\.;1;^'t;^