HomeMy WebLinkAbout2100 PALOMAR AIRPORT RD; BLDG 1; CB061354; Permit09-07-2006
City of Carlsbad
1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008
Commercial/Industrial Permit Permit No: CB061354
Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725
Job Address:
Permit Type:
Parcel No:
Valuation:
Occupancy Group:
Project Title:
2100 PALOMAR AIRPORT RD CBAD
Tl Sub Type: INDUST
2130201800 Lot#: 0
$131,312.00 Construction Type: 111
Reference #:
HANGER #4 -1742 SF OFFICE
Applicant:
RICHARD AND RICHARD
SUITE 100
234 VENTURE ST 92078
Status:
Applied:
Entered By:
Plan Approved:
Issued:
Inspect Area:
Plan Check#:
ISSUED
05/16/2006
JMA
07/10/2006
07/10/2006
RB
Owner:
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
PUBLIC AGENCY 00000
Building Permit
Add'l Building Permit Fee
Plan Check
Add'l Plan Check Fee
Plan Check Discount
Strong Motion Fee
Park Fee
LFM Fee
Bridge Fee
BID #2 Fee
BTD #3 Fee
Renewal Fee
Add'l Renewal Fee
Other Building Fee
Pot. Water Con. Fee
Meter Size
Add'l Pot. Water Con. Fee
Reel. Water Con. Fee
$645.12 Meter Size
$0.00 Add'l Reel. Water Con. Fee
$419.33 Meter Fee
$148.00 SDCWAFee
$0.00 CFD Payoff Fee
$27.58 PFF (3105540)
$0.00 PFF (4305540)
$0.00 License Tax (3104193)
$88.00 License Tax (4304193)
$0.00 Traffic Impact Fee (3105541)
$0.00 Traffic Impact Fee (4305541)
$0.00 PLUMBING TOTAL
$0.00 ELECTRICAL TOTAL
$0.00 MECHANICAL TOTAL
$0.00 Master Drainage Fee
Sewer Fee
$0.00 Redev Parking Fee
$0.00 Additional Fees
HMP Fee
TOTAL PERMIT FEES
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$2,389.88
$2,206.04
$0.00
$0.00
$89.44
$82.56
$48.00
$60.00
$24.00
$0.00
$384.65
$0.00
$0.00
??
$6,612.60
Total Fees:$6,612.60 Total Payments To Date:$6,612.60 Balance Due: $0.00
BUILDING PLANS
.IN STORAGE
.ATTACHED
Inspector:
FINAL APPROVAL
Date 1'?Clearance:
NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "Imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively
referred to as "fees/exactions." You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued lo protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must
follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for
processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack,
review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition.
You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity
changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project. NOR DOES IT APPLY to any
fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired,
PERMIT APPLICATION
CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT
1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad CA 92008
1. PROJECT INFORMATIONgiQQAddress (include Bldg/Suite #)
0613601-3 0009 05/16/2006 001
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
PLAN CHECK NO. QbOb \
EST. VAL. -6£
Plan Ck. Deposit
Validated By
Date
33
\/v\A
Business Name (at this address)
AN/AVTIOKJ
l Description Lot No. Subdivision Name/Number Unit No.Phase No Total » of units
Assessor's Parcel #Existing Use Proposed Use
•£n^2se^^--
2. CONTACT PERSON (if different from applicant)
SofStories # of Bathrooms
Name *
3. APPUCAKT
Address
^Contractor D
Name Address
4, PROPERTY OWNER c
Agent for Contractor
AAA U£, ?J
City
D Owner
City
iS> Palwmr
State/Zip
D
State/Zip
Telephone #
Agent for Owner
Telephone*
£ . o*ruua .0-- HZO*
Fax*
^3o-•0(23
Name Address City ip Telephone I
&. CONTRACTOR -COMPANY NAME
(Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct after, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance,
also requires the applicant for such permit to Tile a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law [Chapter 9. commending with
Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code] or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by
any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars [$500]).
-V gmJ4ftOQ ZZA- MeTSTQgg *3T ..?T£ [CO
Name
State License #_^S
^oa*A4 ft^ *ai
Designer Name
State License #
Address '
i? O^^s License Class C>
Address
City
Cfty
State/Zip
City Business License * |^
State/Zip
Telephone #
li4^S~
Telephone #
6. WORKER'S COMPEHSAT10N
Workers'Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations:
D I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work
for which this permit is issued.
JS I have and will maintain worker's compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued My
worker's compensation insurance carriar and policy number are: .
insurance Company ^^TV\jgy ft4\^l\r PoltevNo IVA,(g>LO.l^y(i5^{§ I Expiration Date_
(THIS SECTION N
D CERTIFICATE
become subject to the
WARNING: Failure to
dollare(|100,000).
IE COMPLETED IF THE PERMfT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS [$100] OR LESS)
I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to
ition lawsoLCalrfornia-
bmpensatnn covamge Is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to on* hundred thousand
E^ompenaatlon, damages are provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor Code, Interest and attorney's I
JXC _^^_^__^^^__ DATE
7. OWMHR-BUfLOeRMCtARATJON
I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason:
D I. as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will d the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sate (Sec. 7044,
Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or
through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale, if, however, the building or improvement is sow within one year of
completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sate).
D I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's
License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts far such projects with contractors) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's
License Law).
D I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason:
1. I personally plan to provide the major labor andmatenafeforc»nshTKSCfioftheproposedprci»rty improvement. D YES Q NO
2. 1 (have/have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work.
3-
4. I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone number /
/Ontractors license number):
5. I will provide some of the work, bull have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name /address /phone number /type of work):
PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE DATE
WHfTE: File YELLOW: Applicant PiNK: Finance
PERMIT APPLICATION
CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT
1 635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad CA 92008
Page 2 of 2
COMPETE tMSSECTTON FOR NCM^ffSTOS^MLBUILDtNOPEIWrre ONLY ' -
Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration for or risk management and prevention program under
Sedions25505.25533or25534c*thePfesley^TannerHazardousSubstanceAccountAct? DYES zf*NO
ts the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? D YES JBNQ
Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? D YES p^NO
IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE
REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT.
8. CDNSTRUCTtONL£HDIH<3 AGENCY
I hereby affirm that there is a construction tending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097(1) Civil Code).
LENDER'S NAME _ LENDER'S ADDRESS _
I certify that 1 have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City
ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the City of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection
purposes I ALSO AGREE TO-fiWE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGEMENTS, COSTS AND
EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAViACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT.
OSHA: An OSHA permit is required foo excavations of 5'0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height
EXPIRATION: Every permit issued b^he building Official ulkJeHhe provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized
by such permit is not commenced \«lnin 180 days from the date of siych permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after
the work is commenced for a perio/at^SO days (Section 1CXM.4 Uniform Building Code).
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE^/ )>1A~--*!:=:* "^"--^ ___^__ DATE _
WHITE: FHe YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance
City ef Carlsbad
Final Building Inspection
Dept: Building Engineering Planning CMWD St Lite
Plan Check #:
Permit #: CB061354
Project Name: HANGER #4-1742 SF OFFICE
09/01/2006
Permit Type: Tl
Sub Type: INDUS!
Address: 2100 PALOMAR AIRPOR! RD
Contact Person: ALFRED Phone: 7608025347
Sewer Dist: CA Water Kst: CA
Lot: 0
Inspected X^/7
Bv: hJnJJ&s-^-
Inspected /
Bv:
Inspected
Bv:
Comments:
Date — /5V-7**Inspected: °{^\
Date
Inspected:
Date
Inspected:
'J^l&Lc Approved: fr
Approved:
Approved:
£ — Disapproved:
Disapproved:
Disapproved:
City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request
For: 09/06/2006
Permit* CB061354
Title: HANGER #4 -1742 SF OFFICE
Description:
Inspector Assignment: RB
Sub Type: INDUST
2100 PALOMAR AIRPORT RD
Lot 0
Type: Tl
Job Address:
Suite:
Location:
OWNER COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
Owner: PALOMAR AIRPORT CENTER LLC (PAC)
Remarks:
Phone. 7608025347
Inspector:
Total Time:
CD Description
19 Final Structural
29 Final Plumbing
39 Final Electrical
49 Final Mechanical
Requested By: ALFRED
Entered By: CHRISTINE
Act y Comment^Wn
Comments/Notices/Hold
Associated PCRs/CVs Original PC#
WITHDRAW PALOMAR AIRPORT BLDG 1; REVISE TRENCH DRAINSPCR05031
PCR05043 ISSUED
PCR05095 ISSUED
PCR05119 ISSUED
PCR05180 ISSUED
PCR05189 ISSUED
PCR05227 ISSUED
PCR06035 ISSUED
inspection History
Date Description Act
09/01/2006 89 Final Combo CO
08/28/2006 17 Interior Lath/Drywall WC TP
08/28/2006 34 Rough Electric AP TP
08/22/2006 84 Rough Combo PA RB
08/11/2006 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding AP TP
AIRPORT HANGAR BLDG-I; PLUMBING REVISIONS
PALOMAR AIRPORT HANGER BLDG 1; MISC REVISIONS DELTA 5
PALOMAR AIRPORT CNTR; DEFERRED STAIR SUBMITTIAL BLDG I
BLDG 1 DELTA 8 STAIR SUBMITTAL;
PALOMAR AIRPORT BLDG 1 DELTA 7; REVISIONS
PALOMAR AIRPORT CENTER ; CHANGE DIRECTIVE H-l DOOR.ADD FIRELITE WINI
PALOMAR AIRPORT BLDG I; WALL GLAZING
Insp Comments
RB SEE NOTICE
F.C. CONDUIT @ 1HR WALLS
SEAL OPENINGS IN CONDUITS
HARD CEIL @ RESTRM
City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request
For: 09/01/2006
Permit* CB061354
Title: HANGER #4-1742 SF OFFICE
Description:
Inspector Assignment: RB
Sub Type: INDUST
2100 PALOMAR AIRPORT RD
Lot 0
Type: Tl
Job Address:
Suite:
Location:
OWNER COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
Owner: PALOMAR AIRPORT CENTER LLC (PAC)
Remarks:
Phone: 7608025347
Inspector:
Total Time:
CD Description
19 Final Structural
29 Final Plumbing
39 Final Electrical
49 Final Mechanical
Requested By: ALFRED
Entered By: CHRISTINE
Act Comment
Comments/Notices/Hold
Associated PCRs/CVs Original PC#
WITHDRAW PALOMAR AIRPORT BLDG I; REVISE TRENCH DRAINSPCR05031
PCR05043 ISSUED
PCR05095 ISSUED
PCR05119 ISSUED
PCR05180 ISSUED
PCR05189 ISSUED
PCR05227 ISSUED
PCR06035 ISSUED
Inspection History
Date Description
08/28/2006 17 Interior Lath/Drywall
08/28/2006 34 Rough Electric
08/22/2006 84 Rough Combo
08/11/2006 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding
08/11/2006 17 Interior Lath/Drywall
AIRPORT HANGAR BLDG-1; PLUMBING REVISIONS
PALOMAR AIRPORT HANGER BLDG 1; MISC REVISIONS DELTA 5
PALOMAR AIRPORT CNTR; DEFERRED STAIR SUBMITT1AL BLDG 1
BLDG 1 DELTA 8 STAIR SUBMITTAL;
PALOMAR AIRPORT BLDG 1 DELTA?; REVISIONS
PALOMAR AIRPORT CENTER ; CHANGE DIRECTIVE H-l DOOR.ADD FIRELITE WINI
PALOMAR AIRPORT BLDG 1; WALL GLAZING
Act Insp Comments
WC TP
AP TP F.C. CONDUIT @ 1HR WALLS
PA RB SEAL OPENINGS IN CONDUITS
AP TP HARD CEIL @ RESTRM
AP TP F.C. INSP @ BRACE FRM
CITY OF CARLSBAD
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
DATE
NOTICE (760) 602-2700
1635 FARADAY AVENUE
FOR INSPECTION CALL (760) 602-2725. RE-INSPECTION FEE DUE? !__; YES
*FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT ______
PHONE
linn INI iiu'l'l i in CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER
I fc
EsGil Corporation
In Partnersfiip -with government for (Building Safety
DATE: July 6, 2O06 n APPI IHAMT
JURISDICTION: Carlsbad Q PLAN REVIEWER
a FILE
PLAN CHECK NO.: 061354 SET: III
PROJECT ADDRESS: 2100 Palomar Airport Road
PROJECT NAME: T.I. of Hangar 4 for Schubach
The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply
with the jurisdiction's building codes.
XI The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes
when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff.
The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list
and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck.
The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil
Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck.
The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant
contact person.
The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to:
X] Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been^onypleted.
Person contacted: Telephone #:
Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #:
Mail Telephone Fax In Person
XI REMARKS: PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING OUTSTANDING CORREO^IpN FOR THE CITY
STAFF'S CONSIDERATION: Exits shall not pass through kitchen/store rooms, or spaces
used for similar purposes. Section 1004.2.2. Please see the exitin/system thru the hangar
By: Bert Domingo Enclosures:
Esgil Corporation
D GA [H MB D EJ D PC 6/28/06 trnsmtl.dot
9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 * (858)560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576
EsGil Corporation
In (Partnership wttfi government for (Buiftfing Safety
DATE: June 23, 2006
JURISDICTION: Carlsbad
PLAN CHECK NO.: 061354 SET: II
PROJECT ADDRESS: 2100 Palomar Airport Road
PROJECT NAME: T.I. of Hangar 4 for Schubach
REVIEWER
a FILE
The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply
with the jurisdiction's building codes.
The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes
when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff.
The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list
and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck.
X] The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil
Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck.
The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant
contact person.
X] The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to:
Gary Seward
234 Venture Street, # 100, San Marcos, CA 92078
Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
/<j Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
Person contacted: Gary Telephone #: (760) 759-2260
Date contacted: fepf^ (byj^) Fax #: 2269
Mail Telephone Faxt-x'ln Person
REMARKS:
By: Bert Domingo
Esgil Corporation
D GA D MB • EJ
Enclosures:
PC 6/15/06 trnsmtldot
9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 * San Diego, California 92123 + (858)560-1468 * Fax (858) 560-1576
Carlsbad 061354
June 23, 2006
RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST
JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 061354
PROJECT ADDRESS: 2100 Palomar Airport Road SET: II
DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY DATE RECHECK COMPLETED:
ESGIL CORPORATION: 6/15/06 June 23, 2006
REVIEWED BY: Bert Domingo
FOREWORD (PLEASE READ):
This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code,
Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws
regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is
based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections
based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department
or other departments.
The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied
before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3,
1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any
state, county or city law.
A. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit new complete sets of
prints to:
B. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon
which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the
revised plans.
C. The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews. The original
correction number has been given for your reference. In case you did not keep a copy of
the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding
corrections. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items.
D. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of
corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where
they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list?
QYes QNo
Caiisbad 061354
Julie 23, 2006
Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit
three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential
projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways:
1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of
Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700.
The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering
and Fire Departments.
2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320
Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all
remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building
Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments.
NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by
the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is
complete.
2. Plans and calculations shall be signed by the California state licensed engineer or
architect where there are structural changes to existing buildings or structural additions.
Please include the California license number, seal, date of license expiration and date
plans are signed. Business and Professions Code. This will be checked when all the
items below are met.
7. Exits shall not pass through kitchens, store rooms, or spaces used for similar purposes.
Section 1004.2.2. Please see the exiting system thru the hangar space. NO
RESPONSE.
• MISCELLANEOUS
19. The windows on the one hour rated wall line(occupancy separation) should be at least
one hour rated windows. THE ELEVATION 5/A2.1 SHOWS 45 MIN. WINDOW.
SHOULD BE ONE HOUR.
ELECTRICAL, ENERGY, PLUMBING, and MECHANICAL CORRECTIONS
PLAN REVIEWER: Eric Jensen
ELECTRICAL (2002 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE)
1. Describe the grounding electrode for the new transformer on the single line diagram:
Type of electrode (s) and conductor sizing. A description of the electrode to be used is
necessary, not a Code section.
New. The electrical equipment (panels and transformers must be above 18" (and) not infringe
on the accessibility ramp. Detail this arrangement on the floorplans.
PLUMBING (2000 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE)
2. What is the source of the water supply to the restroom? (Existing, pipe size, current
loading?) Plans not provided.
Carisbad 061354
June 23, 2006
• MECHANICAL (2000 UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE)
3. Include the outside air design on the mechanical floorplans: Duct sizing and locations.
(Be careful of the routing, the ceiling is a rated separation). Fire/smoke dampers will be
required for the supply/return ducts where they penetrate the occupancy separation.
Note: If you have any questions regarding this Electrical, Plumbing, Mechanical, and Energy
plan review list please contact Eric Jensen at (858) 560-1468. To speed the review
process, note on this list (or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on
the plans.
To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item
has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc.
Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of
corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and
where they are located in the plans.
Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please
indicate:
Yes Q No a
The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive,
Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform
the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review
items, please contact Bert Domingo at Esgil Corporation. Thank you.
EsGil Corporation
In Partnership with government for <SuiCding Safety
DATE: May 30, 2O06 OAPEUCANT
JURIS.
JURISDICTION: Carlsbad a PLAN REVIEWER
a FILE
PLAN CHECK NO.: 061354 SET: I
PROJECT ADDRESS: 2100 Palomar Airport Road
PROJECT NAME: T.I. of Hangar 4 for Schubach
The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply
with the jurisdiction's building codes.
The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes
when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff.
The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list
and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck.
XI The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil
Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck.
The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant
contact person.
XI The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to:
Gary Seward
234 Venture Street, # 100, San Marcos, CA 92078
Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
X] Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
Person contacted: Gary fyul «* 1~ Telephone #: (760) 759-2260
fmSWtti / iltf* [7 > C0HKJCT-Date oeftSeiKlr $kiw (by: $S) Fax #: 2269
"
Fax -"-"in Person
REMARKS:
By: Bert Domingo Enclosures:
Esgil Corporation
D GA D MB • EJ D PC 5/18/06 trnsmtl.dot
9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 * (858)560-1468 * Fax (858) 560-1576
Carlsbad O61354
May 30, 2006
PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST
TENANT IMPROVEMENTS
PLAN CHECK NO.: O61354
OCCUPANCY: B/S1/S5
TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: II ! HR
ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA:
SPRINKLERS?: ?
REMARKS:
DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY
JURISDICTION:
DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW
COMPLETED: May 30, 2006
JURISDICTION: Carlsbad
USE: Office/Storage
ACTUAL AREA:
STORIES: TWO
HEIGHT:
OCCUPANT LOAD:
DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY
ESGIL CORPORATION: 5/18/06
PLAN REVIEWER: Bert Domingo
FOREWORD (PLEASE READ):
This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code,
Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws
regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review
is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections
based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department,
Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required
prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Code sections cited are based on the 1997 UBC.
The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied
before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3,
1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any
state, county or city law.
To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each
correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet number, specification section, etc.
Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans.
TENANT IMPROVEMENTS WITHOUT SPECIFIC ENERGY DATA OR POLICY SUPPLEMENTS (1997UBC)tiforw.dot
Carlsbad 061354
May 30, 2006
1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction
list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans
for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be
submitted in one of two ways:
1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of
Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760)
602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad
Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments.
2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation,
9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468.
Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of
Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire
Departments.
NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be
reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by
EsGil Corporation is complete.
2. Plans and calculations shall be signed by the California state licensed engineer
or architect where there are structural changes to existing buildings or structural
additions. Please include the California license number, seal, date of license
expiration and date plans are signed. Business and Professions Code. This will
be checked when all the items below are met.
3. Provide a note on the site plan indicating the previous use of the tenant space or
building being remodeled. Section 106.3.3.
4. On the first sheet of the plans indicate:
• Type of construction of the existing building,
• Sprinklers: Yes or No
• Present and proposed occupancy classifications of the remodel area,
• The story where the tenant improvement is located,
5. Indicate the use of all spaces adjacent to the area being remodeled or improved.
6. Show any existing fire rated area separation walls, occupancy separation walls,
demising walls, shafts or rated corridors. Identify and provide construction details
for proposed new fire rated walls.
7. Identify existing walls to be removed, existing walls to remain and proposed new
walls. Identify bearing walls, non-bearing walls, and shear walls.
Carlsbad 061354
May 30, 2006
8. Glazing in the following locations should be of safety glazing material in
accordance with Section 2406.4 (see exceptions):
a) Fixed or operable panels adjacent to a door where the nearest exposed
edge of the glazing is within a 24-inch arc of either vertical edge of the door
in a closed position and where the bottom exposed edge of the glazing is
less than 60 inches above the walking surface.
9. Provide notes and/or details to show that the wall finish in toilet rooms are
surfaced with a smooth hard non-absorbent material extending on the walls from
the floor to a height of 4 feet around urinals and within water closet
compartments. Section 807.
10. Note on the plans: "All interior finishes must comply with Chapters of the UBC".
Specify "Class flame spread rating (minimum) for
11. In Groups B, F, H, M and S Occupancies, if the number of employees exceeds
four, provide separate toilet facilities for men and women. If "the total number of
employees will not exceed four", and only one restroom is provided, note the
words in quotation above on the floor plan. Section 2902.3.
12. A one-hour occupancy separation is required between the S 5(hangar)
occupancy and the S1 (storage) occupancy. Table 3-B. this includes the
horizontal separation(ROOF OF S1). Please show detail and cross reference.
13. Exits shall not pass through kitchens, store rooms, or spaces used for similar
purposes. Section 1004.2.2. Please see the exiting system thru the hangar
space.
14. Note on the plans: "All exits are to be openable from inside without the use of a
key or special knowledge."
15. Regardless of occupant load, a floor or landing not more than 1/2 inch below the
threshold is required on each side of an exit door used for disabled access (may
be 1" maximum where not used for disabled access). Section 1003.3.1.6.
16. The tenant space and new and/or existing facilities serving the remodeled area
must be accessible to and functional for the physically disabled. This will be
checked when item 11 above is met.
Carlsbad 061354
May 30, 2006
• MISCELLANEOUS
17. Please use 2002 NEC.
18. Please show the doors 13 & 14 in the schedule.
19. The windows on the one hour rated wall line(occupancy separation) should be at
least one hour rated windows.
20. Provide a copy of the project soil report prepared by a California licensed
architect or civil engineer. The report shall include foundation design
recommendations based on the engineer's findings and shall comply with UBC
Section 1804.
21. In Seismic Zone 4, each site shall be assigned a near-source factor. Identify this
value in the soils report and on the plans. Section 1629.4.2.
22. Investigate the potential for seismically induced soil liquefaction and soil
instability in Seismic Zones 3 and 4. This does not apply to detached, single-
story dwellings. Section 1804.5
23. Note on the plan the soils classification, whether or not the soil is expansive and
note the allowable bearing value. Section 106.3.3.
24. If the soils engineer would recommend that he/she review the foundation
excavations, please note on the foundation plan that "Prior to the contractor
requesting a Building Department foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall
advise the building official in writing that:
a) The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report,
b) The utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and
c) The foundation excavations, the soils expansive characteristics and
bearing capacity conform to the soils report."
25. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan,
grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been
determined that the recommendations in the soils report are properly
incorporated into the construction documents (when required by the soil report).
CARLSBAD SPECIAL CODE REQUIREMENTS
26. If special inspection is required, the designer shall complete the attached Special
Inspection Notice.
Carlsbad O61354
May 30, 2OO6
ELECTRICAL, ENERGY, PLUMBING, and MECHANICAL CORRECTIONS
PLAN REVIEWER: Eric Jensen
ELECTRICAL (2002 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE)
1. Include the GFCI designation for the break room receptacle outlets.
2. Describe the boundary of the Class I, Division 2 location on the floorplans (NEC
513.3). If all electrical is installed above the 18" AFF height, then the auxiliary
rooms will remain unclassified.
3. Describe the grounding electrode for the new transformer on the single line
diagram: Type of electrode (s) and conductor sizing.
4. Include the main overcurrent device existence for panel A4 on the single line
diagram or the panel schedule.
PLUMBING (2000 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE)
5. Is his the only plumbing in the building? If so, show compliance with UPC 904.1
(the "VTR" area must equal the minimum building drain sizing.).
6. Where is the women's restroom located? See CBC Appendix Chapter 29.
7. What is the source of the water supply to the restroom? (Existing, pipe size,
current loading?)
MECHANICAL (2000 UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE)
8. Include the outside air design on the mechanical floorplans: Duct sizing and
locations. (Be careful of the routing, the ceiling is a rated separation).
9. The offices must be under positive pressure at all times the building is occupied.
Please demonstrate how this is accomplished.
ENERGY CONSERVATION
10. Demising wall insulation: The insulation installed at demising walls of non-
residential buildings shall have an R-13 value. (Mandatory feature: 118(f))
Note: If you have any questions regarding this Electrical, Plumbing, Mechanical, and
Energy plan review list please contact Eric Jensen at (858) 560-1468. To speed
the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where the corrected items have
been addressed on the plans.
Carlsbad 061354
May 30, 2006
To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item
has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc.
Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result
of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them
and where they are located in the plans.
Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list?
Please indicate:
Yes Q No a
The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320
Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of
858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any
questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Bert Domingo at
Esgil Corporation. Thank you.
Carlsbad 061354
May 30, 2O06
DISABLED ACCESS REVIEW LIST
DEPARTMENT OF STATE ARCHITECT
TITLE 24
• REMODELS. ADDITIONS AND REPAIRS
1. When alterations, structural repairs or modifications or additions are made to an
existing building, that building, or portion of the building affected, is required to
comply with all of the requirements for new buildings, per Section 1134B.2. These
requirements apply as follows:
a) The area of specific alteration, repair or addition must comply as "new"
construction.
b) A primary entrance to the building and the primary path of travel to the
altered area, must be shown to comply with all accessibility features.
c) Existing sanitary facilities that serve the remodeled area must be shown to
comply with all accessibility features.
d) Existing drinking fountains (if any) must be shown to comply with all
accessibility features.
e) Existing public telephones (if any) must be shown to comply with all
accessibility features.
DOORS
2. Show, or note, that there is a level floor or landing on each side of all doors. The
floor or landing is to be ^2" lower than the doorway threshold, per Section
1133.2.4.1.
3. Show or note that the maximum effort to operate doors shall not exceed 8-1/2
pounds for exterior doors and 5 pounds for interior doors, with such pull or push
effort being applied at right angles to hinged doors and at the center plane of
sliding or folding doors. When fire doors are utilized, the maximum effort to
operate the door may be increased to not exceed 15 pounds. Section 1133B.2.5.
4. Show or note that the lower 10" of all doors comply with Section 1133B.2.6, as
follows:
a) To be smooth and uninterrupted, to allow the door to be opened by a
wheelchair footrest, without creating a trap or hazardous condition.
Carlsbad 061354
May 30, 2006
SANITARY FACILITIES
5. All sanitary facilities are required to be accessible, unless the enforcing agency
determines that complying sanitary facilities are accessible within a reasonable
distance of accessible area, per Section 1115B.1.
6. Note that the doorways leading to sanitary facilities shall be identified, per Section
1115B.5, as follows:
a) An equilateral triangle %" thick with edges 12" long and a vortex pointing
upward at men's rest rooms.
b) A circle %" thick, 12" in diameter at women's rest rooms.
c) A 12" diameter circle with a triangle superimposed on the circle and within
the 12" diameter at unisex rest rooms.
d) The required symbols shall be centered on the door at a height of 60".
e) Braille signage shall also be located on the wall adjacent to the latch
outside of the doorways leading to the sanitary facilities, per Section
1117B.5.7.
Carlsbad 061354
'May 30, 2006
City of Carlsbad
Building Department
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
NOTICE OF REQUIREMENT FOR SPECIAL INSPECTION
Do Not Remove From Plans
Plan Check No. 061354
Job Address or Legal Description 2100 Palo mar Airport Road
Owner Address
You are hereby notified that in addition to the inspection of construction provided by the
Building Department, an approved Registered Special Inspector is required to provide continuous
inspection during the performance of the phases of construction indicated on the reverse side of
this sheet.
The Registered Special Inspector shall be approved by the City of Carlsbad Building
Department prior to the issuance of the building permit. Special Inspectors having a
current certification from the City of San Diego, Los Angeles, or ICBO are approved as
Special Inspectors for the type of construction for which they are certified.
The inspections by a Special Inspector do not change the requirements for inspections by
personnel of the City of Carlsbad building department. The inspections by a Special
Inspector are in addition to the inspections normally required by the County Building
Code.
The Special Inspector is not authorized to inspect and approve any work other than that for which
he/she is specifically assigned to inspect. The Special Inspector is not authorized to accept
alternate materials, structural changes, or any requests for plan changes. The Special Inspector is
required to submit written reports to the City of Carlsbad building department of all work that
he/she inspected and approved. The final inspection approval will not be given until all Special
Inspection reports have been received and approved by the City of Carlsbad building department.
Please submit the names of the inspectors who will perform the special inspections on each of the
items indicated on the reverse side of this sheet.
(over)
Carlsbad 061354
'May 30, 2006
SPECIAL INSPECTION PROGRAM
ADDRESS OR LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
PLAN CHECK NUMBER: OWNER'S NAME:
I, as the owner, or agent of the owner (contractors may not employ the special inspector),
certify that I, or the architect/engineer of record, will be responsible for employing the special
inspector(s) as required by Uniform Building Code (UBC) Section 1701.1 for the construction
project located at the site listed above. UBC Section 106.3.5.
Signed
I, as the engineer/architect of record, certify that I have prepared the following special inspection
program as required by UBC Section 106.3.5 for the construction project located at the site listed above.
Engineer's/Architect's Seal
& Signature HDID
Signed
1. List of work requiring special inspection:
G Soils Compliance Prior to Foundation Inspection
G Structural Concrete Over 2500 PSI
G Prestressed Concrete
G Structural Masonry
G Designer Specified
G Field Welding
G High Strength Bolting
G Expansion/Epoxy Anchors
G Sprayed-On Fireproofing
G Other
2. Name(s) of individual(s) or firm(s) responsible for the special inspections listed
above:
A.
B.
C.
3. Duties of the special inspectors for the work listed above:
A.
B.
C.
Special inspectors shall check in with the City and present their credentials for approval prior to beginning work on the job site.
Carl»bad 0613*4
May 3O, 20O6
VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE
JURISDICTION: Corbbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 061354
PREPARED BY: Bert Domingo DATE: May 30, 2006
BUILDING ADDRESS; 21OO PAlomar Airport Road
BUILDING OCCUPANCY: B/S1 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: II 1HR
BUILDING
PORTION
OFFICE
STORAGE ~~
Air Conditioning
Fire Sprinklers
TOTAL VALUE
Jurisdidlon Code
AREA "
(Sq.Ft.)
1742~~ i^i
1742
3484
cb
valuation
Multiplier
y
s 75.38
~—-- ^32J5
4.63
2.88
By Ordinance
Reg.
Mod,
—-"
VALUE A)
_^—— '
131.312
5B#Q5
8,153
10,034
205,604
, .. 1
Bug. Ptnnit F66jy Ordinance J»j
Ptati Check Fee py Crtlniriea
Type of Review; \7\ Comololft Q Structural Only
L...
Repeats
D Other
r-i Hourly Hour
e*gil Plan Rwfnv
Comments;
$873.04
$567.48
$488.90
Sheet 1 of 1
frwcvaluB.doc
TO'd 900^ T 1I9S3
PLANNING/ENGINEERING APPROVALS
PERMIT NUMBER CB
ADDRESS
DATE
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL ADDITION MINOR
« $10,000.00)
PLAZA CAMINO REAL
CARLSBAD COMPANY STORES
VILLAGE FAIRE
COMPLETE OFFICE BUILDING
OTHER of
PLANNER
<~)
DATE
ENGINEER DATE ffb
D
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET
stimate based on unconfirmed information from applicant.
Calculation based on building plancheck plan submittal.
Address:
Prepared by:
EDU CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses.
Types of Use:
Types of Use:
Sq. Ft./Units:
Sq. Ft./Units:
EDU's:
EDU's:
APT CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses.
Types of Use: f£r>>^>y Sq. Ft/Units: ffigQQ (I 7*6?} ADT's:
Types of Use: _ Sq. FtTUnits: _ ADT's:
(
FEES REQUIRED:
WITHIN CFD: D YES (no bridge & thoroughfare fee in District #1, reduced Traffic Impact Fee)H*NO,»k
Ef2.TI
'. PARK-IN-LIEU FEE
FEE/UNIT:
PARK AREA & #:
X NO. UNITS:=$
2. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE
ADTs/UNITS:7
3. BRIDGE AND THOROUGHFARE FEE (DIST. #1
ADTs/UNITS: V X
. FACILITIES MANAGEMENT FEE ZONE:
UNIT/SQ.FT.:
5. SEWER FEE
EDU's: •
BENEFIT AREA:
EDU's: •
FEE/ADT:
IT. #1
FEE/ADT:
^DIST. #2
J2J2
=$
DIST. #3
/?<£
)
FEE/SQ.FT./UN1T:
6, SEWER LATERAL ($2,500)
7. DRAINAGE FEES PLDA _ :
ACRES: _ X
8. POTABLE WATER FEES
UNITS CODE CONNECTION FEE
=S
HIGH
FEE/AC:
/LOW
=$
METER FEE SDCWA FEE SDCWA FEE
F:\FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET.doc
1 of 2
Rev. 7/14/00
Carlsbad Fire Department BUILDING DEPT.
Plan Review Requirements Category: TI , INDUST
Date of Report: 06-28-2006 Reviewed by:
Name:
Address:
Permit #: CB061354
Job Name: HANGER #4 - 1 742 SF OFFICE &
Job Address: 2100 PALOMAR AIRPORT RD CBAD
you have submitted for review is incomplete. At this time, this office cannot
adequately conduct a review to determine compliance with the applicable codes and/or standards. Please review
carefully all comments attached. Please resubmit the necessary plans and/or specifications, with changes "clouded",
to this office for review and approval.
Conditions:
This project has been reviewed and approved for the purpose of issuance of a
This approval is subject to field inspections, any required test, fire department notations,
conditions in correspondance and compliance with all applicable codes and regulations.
This approval shall not be held to permit or approve the violation of any law.
The Occupancy Classification for aircraft hangar shall be in accordance with CBC Section 31 1.2.3.1
. Please resubmit plan showing correct occupancy type.
Entry: 05/23/2006 By: JV Action: PA Entry: 06/28/2006 By: GR Action: AP
Carlsbad Fire Department
Plan Review Requirements Category: TI, INDUST
Date of Report: 05-23-2006 Reviewed by: ___^_^
/ ^Name: RICHARD AND RICHARD
Address:
SUITE 100
234 VENTURE ST
SAN MARCOS CA 92078
Permit #: CB061354
Job Name: HANGER #4 - 1742 SF OFFICE &
Job Address: 2100 PALOMAR AIRPORT RD CBAD
INCOMPLETE The item you have submitted for review is incomplete. At this time, this office cannot
adequately conduct a review to determine compliance with the applicable codes and/or standards. Please review
carefully all comments attached. Please resubmit the necessary plans and/or specifications, with changes "clouded",
to this office for review and approval.
Conditions:
Cond:CON0001367
[NOT MET] Approved: This project has been reviewed and approved for the purpose of issuance of a
building permit.
This approval is subject to field inspections, any required test, fire department notations,
conditions in correspondance and compliance with all applicable codes and regulations.
This approval shall not be held to permit or approve the violation of any law.
The Occupancy Classification for aircraft hangar shall be in accordance with CBC Section 311.2.3.1
. Please resubmit plan showing correct occupancy type.
Entry: 05/23/2006 By: JV Action: PA /
WISEMAN + RON Y
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS
STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS
FOR
Schubach Aviation T.I.
Carlsbad, CA
April 2006
W + R JOB: 06-034
9888 Carroll Centre Road
TEL. (858)536-5166
Suite 228
WRENGINEERS.COM
San Diego, CA 92126
FAX. (858)536-5163
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SCHUBACH AVIATION T.I.
DESIGN INFO 1-4
VERTICAL DESIGN BY RAMSTEEL 5-27
LATERAL ANALYSIS/BRACED FRAMES 28-45
FOUNDATIONS 46-68
WISEMAN+ROHY Structural Engineers
1997 UBC (2001 CBC) BASE SHEAR EQUATIONS
Aug 2005
PROJECT: Schubach Aviation T.I.
LOCATION: Carisbad, CA
JOB NO: 06-034 4/12/2006 08:44:19
Base Shear:
Importance Factor (I) =
Seismic Zone =
Seismic Zone Factor (Z) =
Soil Profile Type (SA - SE) =
Seismic Source Type (A,B, or C) =
Closest Distance to Known Seismic Source =
R =
Maximum Height =
C,=
T =
1.00
4
0.4
SC
B
10
5.6
12
0.020
(Table 16-K)
(Table 16-1)
(Table 16-1)
(Table 16-J)
(Table 16-U)
km (£
(Table 16-N)
feet
(1630.2.2)
6.21 miles )
0.129 sec.
Ca = 0.40
Cv = 0.56
(includes Na)
(includes Nv)
Na= 1.00
Nv= 1.00
vu =
vu =
vu =
vu =
0.7755 x W
0.1786 xW(max)
0.0440 xW(min)
0.0571 x W (min zone 4 only)
eq. (30-4)
eq. (30-5)
eq. (30-6)
eq. (30-7)
Vu= 0.1786 xW
V,,/1.4= 0.1276 xW
eq. (30-5) controlls
Notes:
interpolates between 2-10 and 2-15 km for Na and Nv
1997 UBC chapter 16 section 30 (2001 CBC)
method 'A' period calculation
does not consider redundancy
Na Used for determination of Ca may be reduced to 1.1 if conditions in
1997 UBC section 1629.4.2 are met.
E:\Projects\06-034 Schubach Aviation T.I\97EQ
Table 16-1
Zone =
Zone Factor =
Seismic Zone Factor Z
1 2A 2B
0.075 0.15 0.20
3
0.30
4
0.40
Table H
Z =
SA
SB
SC
SD
SE
SF
'-Q Seismic Coefficient Ca
1 2A 2B 3
0.075 0.15 0.2 0.3
0.06
0.08
0.09
0.12
0.19
NOTE: Zone
0.12 0.16
0.15 0.20
0.18 0.24
0.22 0.28
0.30 0.34
4 multiplied by Na
0.24
0.30
0.33
0.36
0.36
4
0.4
0.32
0.40
0.40
0.44
0.36
Table 16
Z =
SA
SB
SC
SD
SE
SF
-R Seismic Coefficient C v
1 2A 2B 3
0.075 0.15 0.2 0.3
0.06
0.08
0,13
0.18
0.26
NOTE: Zone
0.12 0.16
0.15 0.20
0.25 0.32
0.32 0.40
0.50 0.64
4 multiplied by Nv
0.24
0.30
0.45
0.54
0.84
4
0.4
0.32
0.40
0.56
0.64
0.96
Table 16-S Near-Source Factor Na
Seismic
Source Type
A
B
C
<2km
1.5
1.3
1.0
5 km
1.2
1.0
1.0
NOTE: Linear interpolation from
>10km
1.0
1.0
1.0
2 km to 10km
Table 16-T Near-Source Factor N v
Seismic
Source Type
A
B
C
<2 km
2.0
1.6
1.0
5 km
1.6
1.2
1.0
NOTE: Linear interpolation from
10km
1.2
1.0
1.0
2 km to 1 5 km
>15km
1.0
1.0
1.0
E:\Projects\06-034 Schubach Aviation T.I\97EQ
WISEMAN + ROHY Structural Engineers
== Design Loads ==
PROJECT: Schubach Aviation T.I.
LOCATION: Carlsbad, CA
JOB NO: 06-034 4/12/2006
Mezzanine: (1 Hour Fire Rating)
Material Deck Steel
Total 42.0 48.0
Live Loads (UnReducible)
Light Storage 125 psf
Seismic
Floor Covering
2 1/2 LT WT Concrete Topping
2" 20 Ga Mtl Deck
Ceiling
Sprinklers
Insulation
Misc
Steel Joists and Girders
Partitions
1.0
32.1
2.1
3.0
1.5
0.5
1.8
1.0
32.1
2.1
3.0
1.5
0.5
1.3
6.5
1.0
32.1
2.1
3.0
1.5
0.5
1.0
6.5
5.0
31.3
84.0
25% of storage
psf
Note: RamSteel accounts for self weight of framing so Deck loads will be input into Ram
cg
"m
< 5
.c i- V
O TO CD05 O 0
gQ: o -5
IIII
UJ
CO£
Z
CD
</>UJ
O
CDZ
P
I <O °-v ui• a<§E OUJ CO
« _l
oa.
iin
•»- o •*-i- CM CO O CO O CO CDCD t^- o CM mo o o o o o00 t» 5 ^.E »E S
o o
a-o
O>c
II O
i_ CDn £o "53
.. "- c tow c "5 "fe3 E CD uo 3 Q. c:tfl O? oI °
a>uU)
CD O
CD J)
"CO 0)CO
O)c
"CCQ0)
CQ
'5to
co co oa. a. CL
o o0 Q "o ooCO •*D)
II II II CD
0-CD £^
••- .^ coX CD COo- S 2
" ^^
« .E
— uj
«? I
II >- ^• sI is:3 £ t(0 *~ aCO ^
CO
SOz
UJ
UJ
2
CO (Oa. ^
oo oUO CD
a. cae
u u
D)
C
2
CO
o -p
ic s.
CD ^CO
•^••^•'^••^••<t'*LocDcDCDri^r»-r^cooacoo)O3O3C3JO>O)
oooooooooooooooooooooo
O)a±a.
I
CD.a
oCO
CDO
a.
LU
CMCNCMCNCMCOCOn
CNJ CM CN CM CM n CO
-r21
ly
Project: ^etf-^Ac AUiA»r«wO T-+ - Date:
NWSE Project #: £>c-o^
VERTICAL DESIGN BY RAMSTEEL
The computer program "RAMSTEEL" was used to analyze and design the steel
beams, columns and base plates for gravity loads. The design is based on the
2001 California Building Code and 'AISC' Allowable Stress Design criteria. The
program calculates tributary loads, live load reductions and selects the member
sizes.
Section 1 of the following output consists of the following:
complete data echo
- key plans indicating final beam designs
key plans indicating beam numbers and column numbers
a plan showing the load patterns used
Section 2 of the following output consists of the following:
- a gravity beam design summary
- an example of a gravity beam design
a column load summary ( a listing of loads at each level of each
column)
a gravity column design summary
- an example of a gravity column design
a base plate design summary
- an example base plate design
The column load summary was referred to for sizing the column pad footings.
The output for all of the beams, columns and base plates are not included
because of the large volume of output.
SECTION 1
Echo of Input Data
INTEB-WIONAI
RAM Manager vlO.O
Brandon J. Deems, P.E.
Schubach Aviation T.I.
DataBase: Schubach Aviation
Building Code: UBC1
04/19/06 15:27:4
Layout Types:
Mezzanine
Tables Selected:
Deck Table: ramdecks
Master Steel Table: ramaisc
Default Steel Table: ramaisc
Alternate Steel Table: ramaisc
Column Steel Table: ramaisc
Reinforcement Table: ramastm
Pan Form Table: ramceco
Story Data:
Level
1
Story Label
Mezzanine
Layout Type
Mezzanine
Height (ft)
10.500
Noncomposite Deck Properties:
ID Self-Weight
psf
NA 0.00
Load Properties:
Surface:
ID
Floor
DL Constr DL
psf psf
42.0 0.0
LL Reduction
psf Type
125.0 Storage
Constr LL
psf
0.0
Mass DL
psf
0.0
Point:
ID
Stairs
DL Constr DL
kips kips
0.800 0.000
LL Reduction
kips Type
2.200 Reducible
Constr LL
kips
0.000
Mass DL
kips
0.000
Grid Systems:
System Label
Grids
Grids:
System: Grids
X Grids Label
Type
Orthogonal
X Offset
ft
0.000
Y Offset
ft
0.000
Rotation
0.00
X
ft
0.0000
20.0000
45.5000
MinY
ft
MaxY
ft
RAM
INTERNATO^AL
RAM Manag
Brandon J. D
Schubach Av
DataBase: Sc
Building Cod
er vlO.O
eems, P.E.
iation T.I.
hubach Aviation
e: UBC1
X Grids Label
4
5
6
7
Y Grids Label
B
A
DATA FOR FLOOR TYPE:
Grid Systems:
Grids
X MinY
61.5000
74.5000
84.5000
107.0000
Y MinX
ft ft
0.0000
9.0000
Mezzanine
Page 11
04/19/0615:27:4
MaxY
MaxX
ft
Columns:
ID
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
11
12
13
15
X
ft
0.000
0.000
20.000
20.000
45.500
45.500
61.500
74.500
107.000
107.000
84.500
84.500
* Parameter. Steel -
Y
ft
0.000
9.000
9.000
0.000
0.000
9.000
9.000
9.000
9.000
0.000
9.000
1.000
Fy
Shape
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
Orientation
Angle
90.00
90.00
90.00
90.00
90.00
90.00
90.00
90.00
90.00
90.00
90.00
90.00
Param*
ksi
46.0
46.0
46.0
46.0
46.0
46.0
46.0
46.0
46.0
46.0
46.0
46.0
Max% Frame
LLRed Type
None Gravity
None Gravity
None Gravity
None Gravity
None Gravity
None Gravity
None Gravity
None Gravity
None Gravity
None Gravity
None Gravity
None Gravity
Concrete - f c
ieiims:
ID
1
2
3
4
6
11
Other -
Xi
ft
0.000 9
20.000 9
45.500 9
61.500 9
-0.000 -4
107.000 -4
E
Yi
ft
.000
.000
.000
.000
.250
.250
Xj
ft
20.000
45.500
61.500
74.500
0.000
107.000
Yj Param*
ft ksi
9.000 50.0
9.000 50.0
9.000 50.0
9.000 50.0
9.000 50.0
9.000 50.0
Max%
LLRed
None
None
None
None
None
None
Type Frame User
Type Size
NonC Gravity None
NonC Gravity None
NonC Gravity W14X22
NonC Gravity W14X22
NonC Gravity None
NonC Gravity None
Echo of Input Data
RAMINTERNATCIMAl
ID
13
14
18
19
27
28
29
30
33
35
36
37
39
40
42
43
44
45
46
RAM Manager vlO.O
Brandon J. Deems, P.E.
Schubach Aviation T.I.
DataBase: Schubach Aviation
Building Code: IJBC1
Xi
20.000
45.500
-0.000
20.000
28.500
37.000
61.500
74.500
53.500
68.000
74.500
84.500
45.500
84.500
92.000
99.500
6.667
13.333
84.500
Yi
-4.250
-4.250
-4.250
-4.250
-4.250
-4.250
-4.250
-4.250
-4.250
-4.250
9.000
9.000
-4.250
-4.250
-4.250
-4.250
-4.250
-4.250
-4.250
Xj Yj Param* Max%
20
45
20
45
28
37
61
74
53
68
84
.000
.500
.000
.500
.500
.000
.500
.500
.500
.000
.500
107.000
84
107
92
99
6
.500
.000
.000
.500
.667
13.333
84.500
9
9
-4
-4
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
-4
-4
9
9
9
9
9
000
.000
.250
.250
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.250
.250
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
.0 None
.0 None
.0 None
.0 None
.0 None
.0 None
.0 None
.0 None
.0 None
.0 None
.0 None
.0 None
.0 None
.0 None
.0 None
.0 None
.0 None
.0 None
.0 None
Type
NonC
NonC
NonC
NonC
NonC
NonC
NonC
NonC
NonC
NonC
NonC
NonC
NonC
NonC
NonC
NonC
NonC
NonC
NonC
Frame
Gravity
Gravity
Gravity
Gravity
Gravity
Gravity
Gravity
Gravity
Gravity
Gravity
Gravity
Gravity
Gravity
Gravity
Gravity
Gravity
Gravity
Gravity
Gravity
Page 3/
04/19/0615:27:4
User
None
None
None
None
None
None
W12X14
None
None
W12X14
W14X22
None
None
None
W12X14
W12X14
W12X14
W12X14
W21X50
* Parameter: Steel - Fy
Concrete - f c
Other -E
Steel Beam Properties:
ID
1
2
3
4
6
11
13
14
18
19
27
28
29
30
33
35
Max
Depth
in
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Min
Depth
in
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Min
Width
in
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Steel
Table
Def.
Def.
Def.
Def.
Def.
Def.
Def.
Def.
Def.
Def.
Def.
Def.
Def.
Def.
Def.
Def.
Defl
Criteria
Def.
Def.
Def.
Def.
Def.
Def.
Def.
Def.
Def.
Def.
Def.
Def.
Def.
Def.
Def.
Def.
•V t« RAM Manager vlO.mml WM ft VI Brandon J. Deems, P
m 1 V Schubach Aviation T
RAM DataBase: Schubach
INTERNATIONAL Raiding CMfi' T TRP
ID Max Min
36 None 0.00
37 None 0.00
39 None 0.00
40 None 0.00
42 None 0.00
43 None 0.00
44 None 0.00
45 None 0.00
46 None 0.00
Slab Edges:
Xi Yi
ft ft
20.000 -4.250
45.500 -4.250
64.000 -4.250
86.000 -4.250
107.000 -4.250
86.000 9.000
74.500 9.000
61.500 9.000
45.500 9.000
20.000 9.000
0.000 9.000
-0.000 -4.250
-0.000 -4.250
16.000 -4.250
Deck Polygons:
Deck Prop
Type ID
Noncomposite NA
L-oad Polygons:
Load Properties ID
Floor
Echo of Input Data f6
0 Page 4/
.E.
.1.
Aviation 04/19/06 15:27:4
1
Min Steel Defl
0.00 Def. Def.
0.00 Def. Def.
0.00 Def. Def.
0.00 Def. Def.
0.00 Def. Def.
0.00 Def. Def.
0.00 Def. Def.
0.00 Def. Def.
0.00 Def. Def.
Xj Yj Edge
ft ft
45.500 -4.250
64.000 -4.250
86.000 -4.250
107.000 -4.250
107.000 9.000
107.000 9.000
86.000 9.000
74.500 9.000
61.500 9.000
45.500 9.000
20.000 9.000
0.000 9.000
16.000 -4.250
20.000 -4.250
Angle X-Coord
ft
0.00 -5.00
112.00
112.00
-5.00
-5.00
X-Coord Y-Coord
ft ft
-5.00 14.00
112.00 14.00
112.00 -9.25
-5.00 -9.25
-5.00 14.00
Dist
in
6.0
6.0
21.0
21.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
21.0
6.0
Y-Coord
ft
14.00
14.00
-9.25
-9.25
14.00
Echo of Input Data
NTEHNAIIONAi
RAM Manager vlO.O
Brandon J. Deems, P.E.
Schubach Aviation T.I.
DataBase: Schubach Aviation
Building Code: UBC1
Page 51
04/19/0615:27:4
User Input Point Loads:
Load Properties ID
Stairs
X-Coord
ft
51.50
Y-Coord
ft
9.00
s as °o^ ..<Dd>*-*00
flo• 1—I."§
•i <" -a
£ .2 5 u
W jj r/% O
"00
o-
a -SCQ oo Q ffl
93
O.>.
J' zgxnM ^ f>" 'fr l.xz IM , s
-1 OSXLZM U ^
"] r LOfrlx2lAV,_^
fr I.XZ I.AA
1s
V
\
t- l-xz I-AA,_^
OfrxgLAA
t- txg LAA
fr TO LM
___ .....
fr l-xz 1.M-
fr l*Z tAA
-ej-
Steel Column
Brandon J. 'Deems, P.E.
Schubach Aviation T.I.
DataBase: Schubach Aviation 04/19/2006 15:27:27
rifiX'S/lfi HSS4X4X^/1fi HRRfiX
5X1/4 HSS4)
f
1X3/16
i
HSS5
f
*X?V1P M<5S5X5V^'1R H<fR^wv4 HSS5X5XJM H«<5=; 5X
5X1/4
"A r ^f
HSS5
^ f
5X1/4
x)
--- -_HSS5
_-• I '->-.,- •— - ' ••-,-• j -- — • •>—'
5.5X
5X1
30Ed06 15:ASD 99Steel Codeet-
9f
oe
9£
62
EE
fL
92
zz
4>a>>Hbeo
£
-S
<
O _:
0)&.
m-
0 <*ooU(D
W H <i
o
p
o
> Q
<D
00 aoT3
Onj
Ioo
S
Lf
JN<NCD00nj <DTJOU13-*-»on
opmfc
*s q0.0 8.8
c_g
« bi>3 0> oj
"S £ oPtf H w
j *sg q— CL^(S
S uo —•-S ^3
9•d V o
*a
(2 H*p^
d.s-s15 °ifN
U
exo
-a
OS
H-l C/3
-a
o
*-~s••«o
PH
r
'
SECTION 2
Beam Summary
RAM
INTERNATIONAL
RAM Steel vlO.O
Brandon J. Deems, P.E.
Schubach Aviation T.I.
DataBase: Schubach Aviation
BuildineCode:TJRf:io
STEEL BEAM DESIGN SUMMARY:
Floor Type: Mezzanine
Bm # Length +M -M
18
6
1
44
45
19
13
2
27
28
39
14
3
33
29
4
35
30
36
40
46
37
42
43
11
20
4
9
20
13
13.
25
4
9
25
13
13
39.
4
9
16
13
13
13.
13.
13
10
22.
5.
8.
22.
13.
13.
4.
9.
ft
00
25
00
00
25
25
50
25
00
50
25
25
00
25
00
00
25
25
00
25
25
00
50
25
00
50
25
25
25
00
kip-ft
64.7
0.0
1.6
55.1
24.7
24.7
90.0
0.0
2.9
90.0
31.5
31.5
257.2
0.0
0.8
48.2
29.6
26.9
25.9
24.1
30.5
1.3
83.1
0.0
0.0
69.9
27.8
27.8
0.0
1.6
kip-ft
0
-50
-50
0
0
0
0
-100
-100
0
0
0
0
-149
-149
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-199
-199
0
0
0
-57
-57
0
7
7
0
0
0
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
4
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
6
0
0
0
5
5
Seff Fy
in3
29
29
29
14
14
47
47
47
14
14
115
68
29
14
14
29
14
14
29
38
94
38
14
14
29
.0
.0
.0
.9
.9
.2
.2
.2
.9
.9
.0
.4
.0
.9
.9
.0
.9
9
.0
.4
.5
.4
9
.9
0
Beam Size
[ 1
04/19/0615:14:3
Steel Code: ASD 9th EC
Studs
ksi
50.
50.
50.
50.
50.
50.
50.
50.
50.
50.
50.
50.
50.
50.
50.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.
50.
50.
50.
50.
50.
50.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
W14X22
W14X22
W14X22
W12X14
W12X14
W16X31
W16X31
W16X31
W12X14
W12X14
W24X55
W18X40
W14X22
W12X14
W12X14
W14X22
W12X14
W12X14
W14X22
W16X26
W21X50
W16X26
W12X14
W12X14
W14X22
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
* after Size denotes beam failed stress/capacity criteria.
# after Size denotes beam failed deflection criteria.
u after Size denotes this size has been assigned by the User.
Gravity Beam Design
1NTESNATDNA1
RAM Steel vl 0.0
Brandon J. Deems, P.E.
Schubach Aviation T.I.
DataBase: Schubach Aviation
Building Code: UBC1
04/19/0615:27:4
Steel Code: ASD 9th EC
Floor Type: Mezzanine
SPAN INFORMATION (ft):
Beam Size (Optimum)
Total Beam Length (ft)
POINT LOADS (kips):
Dist DL RedLL
8.500 2.46 0.00
17.000 2.46 0.00
LINE LOADS (k/ft):
Beam Number = 2
I-End (20.00,9.00) J-End (45.50,9.00)
= W16X31
= 25.50
Fy = 50.0 ksi
Red% NonRLL StorLL Red% RoofLL Red%
0.0
0.0
0.00
0.00
7.04
7.04
0.0
0.0
0.00
0.00
0.0
0.0
Load
1
2
Dist
0.000
25.500
0.000
25.500
DL
0.021
0.021
0.031
0.031
LL
0.063
0.063
0.000
0.000
Red% Type
Stor
NonR
SHEAR: Max V(DL+LL) = 10.96 kips fv = 2.65 ksi Fv= 19.67 ksi
MOMENTS:
Span Cond Moment @ Lb Cb
Center Max +
Controlling
REACTIONS (kips):
DL reaction
Max +LL reaction
Max +total reaction
DEFLECTIONS:
Dead load (in)
Live load (in)
Net Total load (in)
Tension Flange
kip-ft
90.0
90.0
ft
12.8
12.8
ft
0.0
0.0
1.00
1.00
fb
22.89
22.89
Fb
33.00
33.00
Compr Flange
fb Fb
22.89 33.00
Left
3.12
7.84
10.96
Right
3.12
7.84
10.96
at
at
at
12.75ft -
12.75 ft =
12.75ft =
-0.275
-0.713
-0.988
L/D =
L/D =
L/D =
1111
429
310
Load Diagram
INTERNATIONAL
RAM Steel vlO.O
Brandon J. Deems, P.E.
Schubach Aviation T.I.
DataBase: Schubach Aviation
Building Code: UBC1
04/19/06 15:27:4
Floor Type: Mezzanine Beam Number = 2
Span information (ft): I-End (20.00,9.00) J-End (45.50,9.00)
P1
Wl
P2
V\2
Load
PI
P2
Wl
W2
Dist
ft
8.500
17.000
ft
0.000
25.500
DL
kips
2.459
2.459
k/ft
0.052
0.052
LL+
kips
7.039
7.039
k/ft
0.063
0.063
LL-
kips
0.000
0.000
Max Tot
kips
9.497
9.497
k/ft
0.000
0.000
k/ft
0.115
0.115
RAM
INTERNWKXJW
Column Load Summary
RAM Steel vl 0.0
Schubach Aviation T.I.
DataBase: Schubach Aviation
Building Code: UBC1
04/19/06 15:27:3
Steel Code: ASD 9th EC
Units: kips
Column Line 1 - B
Level Coi# Height Dead Self +Live -Live MinTot MaxTot
Mezzanine 1 10.50 6.0 0.2 15.9 0.0 6.2 22.1
Column Line 1 - A
Level Col# Height Dead Self +Live
Mezzanine 2 10.50 1.7 0.2 8.3
Live
-4.1
MinTot
-2.2
MaxTot
10.1
Column Line 2 - B
Level Col# Height Dead Self +Live
Mezzanine 4 10.50 12.0 0.1 30.4
Live
0.0
MinTot
12.1
MaxTot
42.5
Column Line 2 - A
Level Col# Height Dead Self +Live
Mezzanine 3 10.50 4.0 0.1 18.2
-Live
-7.6
MinTot
-3.6
MaxTot
22.3
Column Line 3 - B
Level Col# Height Dead Self +Live
Mezzanine 5 10.50 17.6 0.2 39.9
Live
0.0
MinTot
17.8
MaxTot
57.7
Column Line 3 - A
Col# Height Dead Self +Live -Live
Mezzanine 6 10.50 2.0 0.2 17.7 -11.1
MinTot MaxTot
19.9
Column Line 4 - A
Level Col# Height Dead Self +Live
Mezzanine 7 10.50 5.1 0.2 13.7
Live
0.0
MinTot
5.3
MaxTot
19,1
Column Line 5 - A
Level Col# Height Dead Self +Live
Mezzanine 8 10.50 3.8 0.2 10.2
Live
0.0
MinTot
4.0
MaxTot
14:2
fi'm column
Hivl RAM Steel vlO.O
V 1 V Schubach Aviation T.I.
RAM DataBase; Schubach Aviation
NTBNWICNAI TliiilHitig rnHfi- TTRr.1
Column Line 84.50ft - 1.00ft
Level Col# Height
Vlezzanine 15 10.50
Column Line 6 - A
Level Col# Height
Mezzanine 13 10.50
Column Line 7 - B
Level Col# Height
Mezzanine 12 10.50
Column Line 7 - A
Level Col# Height
Vlezzanine 11 10.50
Dead
20.8
Dead
-2.6
Dead
6.8
Dead
1.9
Load
Self
0.2
Self
0.2
Self
0,2
Self
0.2
summary
+Live -Live
47.0 0.0
+Live -Live
11.6 -16.6
+Live -Live
17.9 0.0
+Live -Live
9.3 -4.6
Page 21
04/19/0615:27:3
Steel Code: ASD 9th EC
MinTot
21.0
MinTot
-19.0
MinTot
7.0
MinTot
-2.6
MaxTot
67.9
MaxTot
9.2
MaxTot
24.9
MaxTot
11.4
INTERNAJTCNAi
Gravity Column Design Summary
RAM Steel vlO.O
Schubach Aviation T.I.
DataBase: Schubach Aviation
Building Code: UBC1
04/19/0615:25:3
Steel Code: ASD 9th EC
Column Line 1 - B
Level P MX
Mezzanine 22.1 0.0
My LC Interaction Eq. Angle
0.0 1 0.25EqHl-l 90.0
Fy Size
46 HSS5X5X1/4
Column Line 1 - A
Level
Mezzanine
P MX My LC Interaction Eq. Angle Fy Size
10.1 0.7 3.9 1 0.33EqHl-3 90.0 46 HSS5X5X5/16
Column Line 2 - B
Level
Mezzanine
P MX My LC Interaction Eq. Angle Fy Size
42.5 0.0 0.0 1 0.92EqHl-l 90.0 46 HSS4X4X3/16
Column Line 2 - A
Level
Mezzanine
P MX My LC Interaction Eq. Angle Fy Size
16.2 1.1 3.6 6 0.85EqHl-l 90.0 46 HSS4X4X3/16
Column Line 3 - B
Level P MX My LC Interaction Eq. Angle Fy Size
Mezzanine 57.7 0.0 0.0 1 0.65EqHl-l 90.0 46 HSS5X5X1/4
Column Line 3 - A
Level
Mezzanine
MX My LC Interaction Eq. Angle Fy Size
6.5 0.5 18 0.42EqHl-3 90.0 46 HSS5X5X5/16
Column Line 4 - A
Level P MX
Mezzanine 16.0 3.7
My LC Interaction Eq. Angle Fy Size
2.4 100.47EqHl-3 90.0 46 HSS5X5X5/16
Column Line 5 - A
Level P MX
Mezzanine 13.9 4.2
My LC Interaction Eq. Angle
1.9 10 0.49EqHl-2 90.0
Fy Size
46 HSS5X5X1/4
Column Line 84.50ft - 1.00ft
Level P MX
Mezzanine 67.9 0.0
My LC Interaction Eq. Angle
0.0 1 0.77EqHl-l 90.0
Fy Size
46 HSS5X5X1/4
Column Line 6 - A
Level P MX
Mezzanine -19.0 10.1
My LC Interaction Eq. Angle Fy Size
1.1 180.85EqHl-3 90,0 46 HSS5X5X1/4
INTERNATIOJAl
Gravity Column Design Summary
RAM Steel vlO.O
Schiibach Aviation T.I.
DataBase: Schubach Aviation
Building Code: UBC1
Page 21
04/19/0615:25:3
Steel Code: ASD 9th EC
Column Line 7 - B
Level P MX My
Mezzanine 24.9 0.0 0.0
LC Interaction Eq. Angle
1 0.28EqHl-l 90.0
Fy Size
46 HSS5X5X1/4
Column Line 7 - A
Level P MX My
Mezzanine 11.4 0.7 4.6
LC Interaction Eq. Angle
1 0.32EqHl-3 90.0
Fy Size
46 HSS5.5X5.5X5/16
INTERNATIONAl
Gravity Column Design
RAM Steel vlO.O
Schubach Aviation T.I.
DataBase: Schubach Aviation
Building Code: UBC1
04/19/0615:34:2
Steel Code: ASD 9th EC
Story level Mezzanine, Column Line 2 - A
Fy(ksi) = 46.00
Orientation (degrees) = 90.0
Column Size = HSS4X4X3/16
INPUT DESIGN PARAMETERS:
Lu(ft)
K
Braced Against Joint Translation __
Column Eccentricity (in) Top
Bottom
X-Axis
10.50
1
Yes
5.00
0.00
Y-Axis
10.50
1
Yes
5.00
0.00
CONTROLLING COLUMN LOADS - Load Case 6:
Axial (kips)
Moments Top MX (kip-ft)
My(kip-ft)
Bot MX (kip-ft)
My (kip-ft)
Single curvature about X-Axis
Single curvature about Y-Axis
Dead
4.06
0.64
0.31
0.00
0.00
Live
12.10
-1.78
3.26
0.00
0.00
Roof
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
CALCULATED PARAMETERS: (DL + LL + RF)
fa (ksi)
fbx (ksi)
fby (ksi)
KL/Rx
Fex
Cmx
6.26
4.40
13.84
81.21
22.64
0.60
Fa (ksi)
Fbx (ksi)
Fby (ksi)
KL/Ry
Fey
Cmy
17.87
30.36
30.36
81.21
22.64
0.60
INTERACTION EQUATION
fa/Fa = 0.35
EqHl-1: 0.350 + 0.120 + 0.378 = 0.849
EqHl-2: 0.227 + 0.145 + 0.456 = 0.828
n >• oase fiate JDesien nummary
Rrlvl RAM Steel vlO.O
M 1 V Schubach Aviation T.I.
RAM ^ataBase: Schubach Aviation
MERKOW. Raiding r^rlp- TTpP.1
Column Line Column Size
1-B HSS5X5X1/4
1-A HSS5X5X5/16
2-B HSS4X4X3/16
2- A HSS4X4X3/16
3 - B HSS5X5X1/4
3- A HSS5X5X5/16
4- A HSS5X5X5/16
5 - A HSS5X5X1/4
84.50ft - 1.00ft HSS5X5X1/4
5 - A HSS5X5X1/4
7 - B HSS5X5X1/4
7- A HSS5.5X5.5X5/16
2**<.--
04/19/0615:36:2
(ksi)
36
36
36
36
36
36
36
36
36
36
36
36
N
(in)
13.00
13.00
12.00
12.00
13.00
13.00
13.00
13.00
13.00
13.00
13.00
13.50
Steel Code:
B
(in)
13.00
13.00
12.00
12.00
13.00
13.00
13.00
13.00
13.00
13.00
13.00
13.50
ASD 9th Et
tp
(in)
0.500
0.375
0.750
0.625
0.875
0.500
0.500
0.500
0.875
0.375
0.625
0.375
WISEMAN + ROHY
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS
BY DATE PROJECT SHEET NO.
JOB NO.
OF
J3L
vU-5
P"a
.211.
Q-n
l
n
A fc. -iKi
-i^
-"L
,5Z
3 << O
H CD0 < 0Q: 0a. O
£ iiV iito "C V)
,5S
2I3 <0 ESo«i io <?oz a
n 0-
2 >i5 "
S OI*
eg 0
CC Ul
X,^r ii ii ii
.s> of oT of
lw«8
-2-
3-
e; as c «:
o o co N.
o X « -g"• "P "c:p i s
Q Q
«;*;*:««
to co CN m m
™ u ii ii u ii n
!°>f I"""1"
X g «
o Win CN toT 9 -CO CO CO
co co co
oi ^- into h- coCO f-
it
I
oCD£3
OC/D
•^~COO
(DO
o03
O"
£
lli
WISEMAN -f ROHY
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS
BY DATE PROJECT T-J-SHEET NO.OF
JOB NO.. £) (0* O ^ r
RA.
SB
Gravity Beam Design
NTERNATOslAl
RAM Steel vlO.O
Brandon J. Deems, P.E.
Schubach Aviation T.L
DataBase: Schubach Aviation
Building Code: UBC1
04/13/0609:06:2
Steel Code: ASD 9th EC
Floor Type: Mezzanine
SPAN INFORMATION (ft):
Beam Size (Optimum)
Total Beam Length (ft)
POINT LOADS (kips):
Dist DL RedLL
6.667 1.95 0.00
13.333 1.95 0.00
LINE LOADS (k/ft):
Beam Number = 1
I-End (0.00,9.00) J-End (20.00,9.00)
= W14X22
= 20.00
Fy = 50.0 ksi
Red% NonRLL StorLL Red% RoofLL Red%
0.0
0.0
0.00
0.00
5.52
5.52
0.0
0.0
0.00
0.00
0.0
0.0
Load
1
2
Dist
0.000
20.000
0.000
20.000
DL
0.021
0.021
0.022
0.022
LL
0.063
0.063
0.000
0.000
Red% Type
Stor
NonR
SHEAR: Max V(DL+LL) = 8.52 kips fv = 2.84 ksi Fv = 18.96 ksi
MOMENTS:
Span Cond Moment @ Lb Cb Tension Flange
kip-ft ft ft
Center
Controlling
Max +55.1
55.1
ft
10.0
10.0
0.0
0.0
1.00
1.00
fb
22.79
22.79
Fb
33.00
33.00
Compr Flange
fb Fb
22.79 33.00
REACTIONS (kips):
DL reaction
Max +LL reaction
Max +total reaction
DEFLECTIONS:
Dead load (in)
Live load (in)
Net Total load (in)
Left
2.38
6.15
8.52
Right
2.38
6.15
8.52
at
at
at
10.00ft -
10.00ft =
10.00ft =
-0.193
-0.508
-0.701
LTD =
L/D =
L/D =
1246
472
342
Gravity Beam Design
INTERNATIONAI
RAM Steel vl 0.0
Brandon J. Deems, P.E.
Schubach Aviation T.I.
DataBase: Schubach Aviation
Building Code: UBC1
04/13/0609:06:2
Steel Code: ASD 9th EC
Floor Type: Mezzanine
SPAN INFORMATION (ft):
Beam Size (Optimum)
Total Beam Length (ft)
POINT LOADS (kips):
Dist DL RedLL
8.500 2.46 0.00
17.000 2.46 0.00
LINE LOADS (k/ft):
Beam Number = 2
I-End (20.00,9.00)
- W16X31
= 25.50
J-End (45.50,9.00)
Fy - 50.0 ksi
Red% NonRLL StorLL Red% RoofLL Red%
0.0
0.0
0.00
0.00
7.04
7.04
0.0
0.0
0.00
0.00
0.0
0.0
Load
1
2
Dist
0.000
25.500
0.000
25.500
DL
0.021
0.021
0.031
0.031
LL
0.063
0.063
0.000
0.000
Red% Type
Stor
NonR
SHEAR: Max V (DL+LL) = 10.96 kips fv = 2.65 ksi Fv= 19.67 ksi
MOMENTS:
Span Cond '.
Center Max +
Controlling
REACTIONS (kips):
DL reaction
Max +LL reaction
Max +total reaction
DEFLECTIONS:
Dead load (in)
Live load (in)
Net Total load (in)
cnent
dp-ft
90.0
90.0
@
ft
12.8
12.8
Lb
ft
0.0
0.0
Cb
1.00
1.00
Tension Flange
fb Fb
22.89 33.00
22.89 33.00
Compr Flange
fb Fb
22.89 33.00
Left
3.12
7.84
10.96
Right
3.12
7.84
10.96
at
at
at
12.75ft =
12.75ft =
12.75ft -
-0.275
-0.713
-0.988
L/D =
L/D =
L/D =
Till
429
310
Gravity Beam Design
INTERNAIIONAI
RAM Steel vl 0.0
Brandon J. Deems, P.E.
Schubach Aviation T.I.
DataBase: Schubach Aviation
Building Code: UBC1
04/13/0609:06:2
Steel Code: ASD 9th EC
Floor Type: Mezzanine
SPAN INFORMATION (ft): I-End (45.50,9.00)
Beam Size (Optimum) = W12X14
Total Beam Length (ft) = 16.00
POINT LOADS (kips):
Dist DL RedLL
8.000 2.32 0.00
LINE LOADS (k/ft):
Beam Number = 3
J-End (61.50,9.00)
Fy - 50.0 ksi
Load
1
2
Dist
0.000
16.000
0.000
16.000
DL
0.021
0.021
0.014
0.014
LL
0.063
0.063
0.000
0.000
Red%
0.0
LL
0.063
0.063
0.000
0.000
NonRLL
0.00
Red%
—
—
StorLL
6.62
T:s
No
Red%
0.0
RoofLL
0.00
Red%
0.0
e
Stor
SHEAR: Max V (DL+LL) - 5.25 kips
MOMENTS:
Span Cond
Center Max +
Controlling
REACTIONS (kips):
fv = 2.29 ksi Fv = 18.76 ksi
Moment
kip-ft
38.9
38.9
@
ft
8.0
8.0
Lb
ft
0.0
0.0
Cb
1.00
1.00
Tension Flange
fb Fb
31.33 33.00
31.33 33.00
Compr Flange
fb Fb
31.33 33.00
tow =70> 5"
DL reaction
Max +LL reaction
Max +total reaction
DEFLECTIONS:
Dead load (in)
Live load (in)
Net Total load (in)
Left
1.44
3.81
5.25
Right
1.44
3.81
5.25
at
at
at
8.00ft =
8.00ft =
8.00ft =
-0.153
-0.416
-0.569
L/D =
L/D -
L/D =
1252
-461
337
Gravity Beam Design
irJTEtNATO-WL
RAM Steel vl 0.0
Brandon J. Deems, P.E.
Schubach Aviation T.I.
DataBase: Schubach Aviation
Building Code: UBC1
04/13/0609:06:2
Steel Code: ASD 9th EC
Floor Type: Mezzanine
SPAN INFORMATION (ft): I-End (61.50,9.00)
Beam Size (User Selected) - W12X14
Total Beam Length (ft) = 13.00
POINT LOADS (kips):
Dist DL RedLL
6.500 1.90 0.00
LINE LOADS (k/ft):
Beam Number = 4
J-End (74.50,9.00)
Fy - 50.0 ksi
Load
1
2
Dist
0.000
13.000
0.000
13.000
DL
0.021
0.021
0.014
0.014
LL
0.063
0.063
0.000
0.000
Red% NonRLL StorLL
0.0
LL
0.063
0.063
0.000
0.000
0.00 5.38
Red% T:
S
No
Red%
0.0
RoofLL
0.00
Red%
0.0
e
Stor
SHEAR: Max V(DL+LL) = 4.28 kips fv = 1.87 ksi Fv = 18.76 ksi
MOMENTS:
Span Cond Moment @ Lb Cb Tension Flange
kip-ft
Center
Controlling
Max +25.7
25.7
ft
6.5
6.5
ft
0.0
0.0
1.00
1.00
fb
20.73
20.73
Fb
33.00
33.00
Compr Flange
fb Fb
20.73 33.00
REACTIONS (kips):
DL reaction
Max +LL reaction
Max +total reaction
DEFLECTIONS:
Dead load (in)
Live load (in)
Net Total load (in)
Left
1.18
3.10
4.28
Right
1.18
3.10
4.28
at
at
at
6.50ft -
6.50ft =
6.50ft =
-0.067
-0.181
-0.249
L/D =
L/D =
L/D =
2316
"860
627
Gravity Beam Design
NTEKNWOMAL
RAM Steel vl 0.0
Brandon J. Deems, P.E.
Schubach Aviation T.I.
DataBase: Schubach Aviation
Building Code: UBC1
04/13/0609:06:2
Steel Code: ASD 9th EC
Floor Type: Mezzanine
SPAN INFORMATION (ft):
Beam Size (User Selected)
Total Beam Length (ft)
LINE LOADS (k/ft):
Beam Number = 36
Load
1
2
Dist
0.000
10.000
0.000
10.000
DL
0.021
0.021
0.014
0.014
LL
0.063
0.063
0.000
0.000
I-End (74.50,9.00)
- W12X14
- 10.00
Red%
J-End (84.50,9.00)
Fy = 50.0 ksi
SHEAR: Max V (DL+LL) = 0.49 kips
MOMENTS:
Span Cond
Center Max +
Controlling
REACTIONS (kips):
Type
Stor
NonR
fv = 0.21 ksi Fv = 18.76 ksi
Moment
kip-ft
1.2
1.2
1V&L- .1/11'
@ft
5.0
5.0
Lb
ft
0.0
0.0
Cb
1.00
1.00
Tension Flange
fb
0.98
0.98
Fb
33.00
33.00
Compr Flange
fb Fb
0.98 33.00
flu
DL reaction
Max +LL reaction
Max +total reaction
DEFLECTIONS:
Dead load (in)
Live load (in)
Net Total load (in)
Left
0.18
0.31
0.49
Right
0.18
0.31
0.49
at
at
at
5.00ft =
5.00ft =
5.00ft =
-0.003
-0.005
-0.009
LiD = 38980
L/D = 21926
L/D = 14032
Gravity Beam Desien
INTERN/JO^
RAM Steel vlO.O
Brandon J. Deems, P.E.
Schubach Aviation T.I.
DataBase: Schubach Aviation
Building Code: UBC1
04/13/0609:06:2
Steel Code: ASD 9th EC
Floor Type: Mezzanine
SPAN INFORMATION (ft):
Beam Size (Optimum)
Total Beam Length (ft)
POINT LOADS (kips):
Dist DL RedLL
7.500 2.18 0.00
15.000 2.18 0.00
LINE LOADS (k/ft):
Beam Number = 37
I-End (84.50,9.00) J-End (107.00,9.00)
= W16X26
= 22.50
Fy = 50.0 ksi
Red% NonRLL StorLL
0.0
0.0
0.00
0.00
6.21
6.21
Red% RoofLL
0.0
0.0
0.00
0.00
Red%
0.0
0.0
Load
1
2
Dist
0.000
22.500
0.000
22.500
DL
0.021
0.021
0.026
0.026
LL
0.063
0.063
0.000
0.000
Red% Type
Stor
NonR
SHEAR: Max V (DL+LL) = 9.62 kips fv-2.56 ksi Fv = 17.89 ksi
MOMENTS:
Span Cond
Center Max +
Controlling
REACTIONS (kips):
DL reaction
Max +LL reaction
Max +total reaction
DEFLECTIONS:
Dead load (in)
Live load (in)
Net Total load (in)
ment
:ip-ft
69.9
69.9
@
ft
11.3
11.3
Lb
ft
0.0
0.0
Cb
1.00
1.00
Tension Flange
fb
21.83
21.83
Fb
33,00
33.00
Compr Flange
fb Fb
21.83 33.00
--5*Left
2.71
6.91
9.62
Right
2.71
6.91
9.62
at
at
at
11.25ft -
11.25ft =
11.25ft -
-0.206
-0.538
-0.744
L/D =
L/D =
L/D -
1313
502
363
CD•5I
Q
V)
au.
a.
j!
in
- l'! '0 - ft.S 8 @ ra
"O "5 -o a fflui 11 J•o J w
W 1 ^ 1D -S^o <
|| fl) (0 *~ f ,tJL > u_ CJOS - M
^ TJ m
»- 3 * "*0) 5 S ni ,!S
— ' S "" ^sc ^ h-
•- 1 M
* ^ o ^Q 8 „
(00)
00
n
a
a>*•>
o
Q.E C
« =sQ m IM •- •-
O N It II N
1 'S ^ E *
Z
<nc3
2 Required BoltsFor Axial^H6X T>o >R
= 1
Jj C.
CC
*
*
£S|
£
3 10. j
II
tf ?5 i
= 1
o £Axial Load(kips)3g
|g
£
a
c.0
R S
ooI
0
ID
O>
m
c
r
m
iro
ID
oo
1
=
COIT
ino
°
o
-if
^
s
o
oCM
M
g
5
01
— i
i--S»cX
M
8
f-
I
r-
0
OJ
c
Q
C
o
p.
2
o
$
inEM
(0
o
n
M
to
*ne A Bm 2-j
toCMCtOr
ITID
r^
n
a
m
ITo
*
oo
°
t*-
(O
CN
^
o
m
CC
c
ID
O
O
si
CM
5
ne A Bm 3_j
pn„cX
s
IV
«
S
o
'
co
o
at>
<ot.
=
o
CC
r-
o
o
Dm
CM
5
ne A Bm 4-i
noI
mID
-
9=
au
en
o
'
oo
°
CO
CC
•o
D
O
d
•ao
in
a
o
?.
g
ne A Bm 5-i
COoscX
u
G
ffi
Sc-
c
ffi
c
c
o
f?
s
r^CD
O
O
oU)
O3
ai
'
o
S
CMCM
ID
5
ne A Bm 6-j
o222
*
z
41
2
2
2
41
1
41
O
O
o
o
o
o
o
o
3o
oo41£g
1
g
1
5
1
s
41
2
41
Oo
=
o
o
o
o
o
ood
oo1*2
1
41
41
2
2
1
4j
s
2
oo
°
o
o
o
o
o
no
ooz*<
S
*
41
*
g
^
5
£
*
d&
o
-
-
o
o
-
c>
oo414141
*
2
^
*
i
I
2
zft
ft-
oo
o
o
o
o
o
o
a
ooz*ii
I
i
41
^
g
S
z!
Z
41
C!
O
O
o
o
o
o
°
1
ooz5^
*
z
2
*
Z
4
Z
Z
Z
Oo
°
o
o
o
o
o
oo
oQ41£41
1
41
41
1
ft
41
z"ft
i
*
oo
o
o
o
o
=
=
8
oo*412
2
Z
41
41
41
*
Zft
a
Za
°
o
o
o
o
=
o
o
o
oos*1
2
2
41
41
^
2a
Zit
g
Za
c
o
°
o
0
o
o
o
oo4141«
41
Z
*
41
41
ZIt
Z
^
ZIt
o
°
o
o
o
o
o
oo
o
0 0o 6ft 4122ft ft» *
II
z 2ft a
ft V
ft 41
1 1
ft *
Ss
g|
22a s
o c
0 O
00
;*
o o
o o
o o
o oQ Oo" o
Beam Web Tearout Capacities using
(ASD, w/o Increases) ,
0.875in A325 SC Bolts
Bolt Grade= A325
Hole Type (STD, LSL, SSL)= STD
Bolt Dia.(in)= 0.875
Bolt shear capacity (k)= 10.2
Note: Bolt capacities indicated below do not take into
account effects of vertical loads on bolt group.
Capacities shown are the minimum of web tearout and
fastener group capacity.
Note: Shear tab thicknes required is based on full strength of bolts.
End of beam to CL first row of bolts = 2.50 in.
Spacing Between rows of bolts= 3.00 in.
Spacing Between bolts in a row= 3.00 in.
Hole dia = bolt dia + 1/16" = 0.94 in.
Ultimate tensile capacity of beam= 65 ksi
R=.3AVFU+.5A,FLJ
Web Tear-Out Capacities
For Reference Only
Beam Size tw(in)
Single Row
Capacity (k)
Double
Row
Capacity
(k)
Triple Row
Capacity
(k)
# bolts in a row 3
W12&14 ^ — ;
W12X14
W12x16
W12x19
W 12x22
W 12x26
W12X30
W12x35
W 12x40
/V 12x50
W 12x53
W 12x58
W 14x22
W 14x26
W14X30
W 14x34
W 14x38
W 14x43
W 14x48
W 14x53
0.2
0.22
0.235
0.26
0.23
0.26
0.3
0.295
0.37
0.345
0.36
0.23
0.255
0.27
0.285
0.31
0.305
0.34
0.37
/ 30.6Q/
— -3CT60-^
30.60
30.60
30.60
30.60
30.60
30.60
30.60
30.60
30.60
30.60
30.60
30.60
30.60
30.60
30.60
30.60
30.60
61.20
61.20
61.20
61.20
61.20
61.20
61.20
61.20
61.20
61.20
6120
61-20
61.20
61-20
61.20
61-20
61.20
61.20
74.83
82.31
87.93
91.80
86.06
91.80
91.80
91.80
91.80
91.80
91.80
86.06
91.80
91.80
91.80
91.80
91.80
91.80
91.80
Bolt Capacity 30.60 61 .20 91 .80
Tab t Req'd (in) 0.15 0.30 0.46
# bolts in a row 4
W16&18
W 16x26
W 16x31
W 16x36
W 16X40
W 16X45
W 16X50
W 16X67
W16X77
W 16X89
W 16X1 00
W 18X35
W 18X40
W 18X46
W 18X50
W 18X55
W18X60
/ 18X65
AM8X71
0.25
0.275
0.295
0.305
0.345
0.38
0.395
0.455
0.525
0.585
0.3
0.315
0.36
0.355
0.39
0.415
0.45
0.495
40.80
40.80
40.80
40.80
40.80
40.80
40.80
40.80
40.80
40.80
40.80
40.80
40.80
40.80
40.80
40.80
40.80
40.80
81.60
81-60
81.60
81.60
81.60
81.60
81.60
81.60
81-60
81.60
81.60
81.60
81-60
81.60
81.60
81.60
81.60
81.60
110.30
121.33
122.40
122.40
122.40
122.40
122.40
122.40
122.40
122.40
122.40
122.40
122.40
122.40
122.40
122.40
122.40
122.40
Bolt Capacity 40.80 81.60 122.40
Tab t Req'd (in) 0.15 0-30 0.46
Quad Row
Capacity (k)One Row Two Rows
Three
Rows
Four
Rows
WfSEMAN+ROHY Structural Engineers
STEEL BRACE RESTRICTIONS - UBC ==
Version 2.01 (12/03)
PROJECT NAME
LOCATION
Schubach Aviatioin "r"
4/13/2006 08:19:54
BASIS: 1997 UBC
CONCENTRICALLY BRACED FRAME (ORDINARY AND SPECIAL)
RECTANGULAR TUBES WITH Fy=46 ksi & Es=29000 ksi
K IS ASSUMED TO BE 1
H = TUBE WIDTH MINUS 3 TIMES THE WALL THICKNESS
Brace Sizes
HSS3X3X3/16
HSS3X3X1/4
HSS3X3X5/16
HSS4X4X3/16
HSS4X4X1/4
HSS4X4X5/16
HSS4X4X3/8
HSS4X4X1/2
HSS 5X5X3/1 6
HSS5X5X1/4
HSS5X5X5/16
HSS5X5X3/8
HSS5X5X1/2
HSS6X6X1/4
HSS6X6X5/16
HSS6X6X3/8
HSS6X6X1/2
HSS6X6X5/8
HSS7X7X1/4
HSS7X7X5/16
HSS7X7X3/8
HSS7X7X1/2
HSS7X7X9/16
HSS8X8X5/16
HSS8X8X3/8
HSS8X8X1/2
HSS8X8X5/8
HSS10X10X3/8
HSS10X10X1/2
HSS10X10X5/8
HSS1 2X1 2X1/2
HSS 12X1 2X5/8
Wt. Per Ft.
(LBS.J
6.85
8.78
10.5
9.4
12.2
14.8
17.2
21.5
12
15.6
19
22.3
28.3
19
23.3
27.4
35.1
42.1
22.4
27.5
32.5
41.9
50.6
31.8
37.6
48.7
59.1
47.8
62.3
76.1
75.9
93.1
r
1.14
1.11
1.08
1.55
1.52
1.49
1.47
1.41
1.96
1.93
1.9
1.87
1.82
2.34
2.31
2.28
2.23
2.17
2.75
2.72
2.69
2.63
2.58
3.13
3.1
3.04
2.99
3.92
3.86
3.8
4.68
4.62
H/T Ratio
14.2
9.88
7.31
20
14.2
10.7
8.46
5.6
25.7
18.5
14.2
11.3
7.75
22.8
17.6
14.2
9.9
7.33
27
21.1
17.1
12.1
9.05
24.5
19.9
14.2
10.8
25.7
18.5
14.2
22.8
17.7
/^ (Ordinary)
7 Max. Length in Feet
Zones3&4l1l<!> ,
V_ 10.1__--^
9.8
9.6
N/A
13.4
13.2
13.0
12.5
N/A
JiiWfc^i
( 16.8^
16.5
16.1
N/A
N/A
20.2
19.7
19.2
N/A
N/A
N/A
23.3
22.8
N/A
N/A
26.9
26.5
N/A
N/A
33.6
N/A
N/A
\ (Special)
I Max. Length in Feet
7 Zones3&4<3)(4)
14.0
13.6
13.3
N/A
18.7
18.3
18.1
17.3
N/A
N/A
23.3
23.0
22.4
N/A
N/A
28.0
27.4
26.7
N/A
N/A
N/A
32.3
31.7
N/A
N/A
37.4
36.7
N/A
N/A
46.7
N/A
N/A
(1) Based on h/t <=110/(Fy)1/2
(2) Governed by KL/r <= 720/(Fy)t/2
(3) Based on h/t <= 110/(Fy)1'2
(4) Governed by KL/r <= 1000/{Fy)l/2
(5) Design parameters for Seismic Zones 1 & 2 are h/t < 190/(Fy)1/2 (compact) and KL/R < 200.
APPROVED:
E:\Standards\Design Aids\Steel\HSS Steel Brace_UBC97
WISEMAN + ROHY
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS
BY V4^ DATE PROJECT SHEET NO. OF
JOB NO. 0 C^O^
" i Dl
Lft^rfc'ta
/
Jl
O
WISEMAN + ROHY
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS
BY P DATE PROJECT SHEET NO.OF
JOB NO.
CD
WISEMAN + ROHY
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS
BY D H DATE PROJECT ^ KC t' T •SHEET NO. OF
JOB NO.
U31
wit ri-^
I//
WISEMAN + ROHY
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS
BY DATE PROJECT UO-SHEET NO. OF
JOB NO.
\\
(D
l<7
u
WISEMAN + ROHV
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS
BY DATE PROJECT SHEET NO.OF
JOB NO. OLp~O
—4\-.
LU
"OrLr-
WISEMAN + ROHY
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS
BY DATE PROJECT SHEET NO.OF
JOB NO.
°i
i\
D
lfc
>v-^ ^o
^
M0
^
'.05
{
r
WISEMAN+ROHY Structural Engineers
== BRACED FRAME G.B, ==
Aug 2005
PROJECT: Schubach Aviation T.I.
LOCATION: Line A
JOB NO: 06-034 4/13/2006 07:59:02
CASE:.9DL+Seismic
ALLOWABLE SOIL PRESSURE:
DISTANCE BWN. F.F. & T.O.GB.=
GRADE BEAM GEOMETRY (FT.)
4 KSF (INCLUDES INCREASE)
0.67 FT
THICKNESS
1.75
WIDTH
4
LENGTH OF
FRAME
13
GB. EXT. EA.
END
5.75
VERTICAL LOADING
TYPICAL DISTANCE BTW. BF. COLUMNS^
DL Reduction Factor^
LL Reduction Factor=
TOTAL G.B. LENGTH (FT.)=
GRADE BEAM DL (KLF)=
(INCL. SOIL ABOVE G.B.
0.90
0.00
24.5
i.21
9 FT.
BF. COL #
1
2
3
4
5
DL(K)
4.7
3,7
0
0
0
LL(K)
12.9
10,2
0
0
0
SNOW (K)
0
0
0
0
0
ADDITIONAL LOADING
LOAD NO.
1
2
3
4
5
DIST. FROM
END C1 (FT.)
0
0
0
0
0
DL(K)
0
0
0
0
0
LL(K)
0
0
0
0
0
SNOW (K)
0
0
0
0
0
LATERAL LOADING
LOAD#
1
2
3
4
5
LAT. FORCE
28.2
0
0
0
0
HT.A.F.F. (FT.)
11
0
0
0
0
PTOT=
MOT=
MR=
ft"*
U6=
37.21 K
378.44 FT.K
436.69 FT.K
10.68 FT.
4.08 FT.Maximum
OVERALL STABILITY=
SOIL PRESSURE=
Shear= 39.73 kip
fi Vc= 93.06 kip
(Assumes d=Thick. - 4")
1.15
3.96 KSF O.K.
Moment, Mu= 189.09 k-ft
fc= 4500 psi
E:\Projects\06-034 Schubach Aviation T.IM3B Line A
WISEMAN+ROHY Structural Engineers
== BRACED FRAME G.B. ==
Aug 2005
PROJECT: Schubach Aviation T.I.
LOCATION: Line A
JOB NO: 06-034 4/13/2006 07:59:35,
CASE:DL+Seismic
ALLOWABLE SOIL PRESSURE:
DISTANCE BWN. F.F. & T.O.GB.=
GRADE BEAM GEOMETRY (FT.)
4 KSF (INCLUDES INCREASE)
0.67 FT
THICKNESS
1.75
WIDTH
4
LENGTH OF
FRAME
13
GB. EXT. EA.
END
5.75
VERTICAL LOADING
TYPICAL DISTANCE BTW. BF. COLUMNS^
DL Reduction Factor=
LL Reduction Factor=
TOTAL G.B. LENGTH (FT.)=
GRADE BEAM DL (KLF)=
(INCL. SOIL ABOVE G.B.)
1.00
0.00
24.5
1.34
9 FT.
BF. COL #
1
2
3
4
5
DL(K)
4.7
3.7
0
0
0
LL(K)
12.9
10.2
0
0
0
SNOW (K)
0
0
0
0
0
ADDITIONAL LOADING
LOAD NO.
1
2
3
4
5
DIST. FROM
END 01 (FT.)
0
0
0
0
0
DL(K)
0
0
0
0
0
LL(K)
0
0
0
0
0
SNOW (K)
0
0
0
0
0
LATERAL LOADING
LOAD#
1
2
3
4
5
LAT. FORCE
28.2
0
0
0
0
HT. A.F.F. (FT.)
11
0
0
0
0
PTOT=
MOT=
MR=
e=
L/6=
41.35 K
378.44 FT.K
485.21 FT.K
9.67 FT.
4.08 FT.Maximum
OVERALL STABILITY=
SOIL PRESSURED
Shear= 43.22 kip
fi Vc= 93.06 kip
(Assumes d=Thick. - 4")
1.28
2.67 KSF O.K.
Moment, Mu= 154.81 k-ft
fc= 4500 psi
E:\Projects\06-034 Schubach Aviation T.I\GB Line A
WISEMAN+ROHY Structural Engineers
== BRACED FRAME G.B. ==
Aug 2005
PROJECT: Schubach Aviation T.I.
LOCATION: Line A
JOB NO: 06-034 4/13/2006 07:59:44
CASE:DL+LL+Seismic
ALLOWABLE SOIL PRESSURE:
DISTANCE BWN. F.F. & T.O.GB.=
GRADE BEAM GEOMETRY (FT.)
4 KSF (INCLUDES INCREASE)
0.67 FT
THICKNESS
1.75
WIDTH
4
LENGTH OF
FRAME
13
GB. EXT. EA.
END
5.75
VERTICAL LOADING
TYPICAL DISTANCE BTW. BF. COLUMNS=
DL Reduction Factor=
LL Reduction Factor=
TOTAL G.B. LENGTH (FT.)=
GRADE BEAM DL (KLF)=
(INCL SOIL ABOVE G.B.
1.00
1.00
24.5
•L34
9 FT.
BF. COL. #
1
2
3
4
5
DL(K)
4.7
3.7
0
0
0
LL(K)
12.9
10.2
0
0
0
SNOW (K)
0
0
0
0
0
ADDITIONAL LOADING
LOAD NO.
1
2
3
4
5
DIST. FROM
END C1 (FT.)
0
0
0
0
0
DL(K)
0
0
0
0
0
LL(K)
0
0
0
0
0
SNOW (K)
0
0
0
0
0
LATERAL LOADING
LOAD#
1
2
3
4
5
LAT. FORCE
28.2
0
0
0
0
HT.A.F.F. (FT.)
11
0
0
0
0
PTOT=
MOT=
MR=
e=
L/6=
64.45 K
378.44 FT.K
709.83 FT.K
7.11 FT.
4.08 FT.Maximum
OVERALL STABIL!TY=
SOIL PRESSURE=
Shear= 43.90 kip
fi Vc= 93.06 kip
(Assumes d=Thick. - 4")
1.88
2.09 KSF O.K.
Moment, Mu= 138.23 k-ft
fc= 4500 psi
E:\Projects\06-034 Schubach Aviation T.I\GB Line A
WISEMAN+ROHY Structural Engineers
== BRACED FRAME G.B. ==
Aug 2005
PROJECT: Schubach Aviation T.I.
LOCATION: Line A
JOB NO: 06-034 4/13/2006 08:00:01
/ *
M
CASE:DL+LL
ALLOWABLE SOIL PRESSURE:
DISTANCE BWN. F.F. & T.O.GB.=
GRADE BEAM GEOMETRY (FT.)
3 KSF (INCLUDES INCREASE)
0.67 FT
THICKNESS
1.75
WIDTH
4
LENGTH OF
FRAME
13
GB. EXT. EA.
END
5.75
VERTICAL LOADING
TYPICAL DISTANCE BTW. BF. COLUMNS=
DL Reduction Factor=
LL Reduction Factor^
TOTAL G.B. LENGTH (FT.)=
GRADE BEAM DL (KLF)=
(INCL. SOIL ABOVE G.B.
1.00
1.00
24.5
•L34
9 FT.
BF. COL. #
1
2
3
4
5
DL(K)
4.7
3.7
0
0
0
LL(K)
12.9
10.2
0
0
0
SNOW (K)
0
0
0
0
0
ADDITIONAL LOADING
LOAD NO.
1
2
3
4
5
DIST. FROM
END C1 (FT.)
0
0
0
0
0
DL(K)
0
0
0
0
0
LL(K)
0
0
0
0
0
SNOW (K)
0
0
0
0
0
LATERAL LOADING
LOAD#
1
2
3
4
5
LAT. FORCE
0
0
0
0
0
HT. A.F.F. (FT.)
0
0
0
0
0
PTOT=
MOT=
MR=
e=
U6=
64.45 K
0.00 FT.K
709.83 FT.K
1.24 FT.
4.08 FT.
OVERALL STABILITY= N/A
SOIL PRESSURE= 0.86 KSF O.K.
Maximum Shear= 13.52 kip
fi Vc= 93.06 kip
(Assumes d=Thick. - 4")
Moment, Mu= 41.98 k-ft
fc= 4500 psi
E:\Projects\06-034 Schubach Aviation T.I\GB Line A
WISEMAN+ROHY Structural Engineers
== BRACED FRAME G.B. ==
Aug 2005
PROJECT: Schubach Aviation T.i.
LOCATION: Line 1
JOB NO: 06-034 4/13/2006 07:46:01
CASE:DL+LL
ALLOWABLE SOIL PRESSURE:
DISTANCE BWN. F.F. & T.O.GB.=
GRADE BEAM GEOMETRY (FT.)
3 KSF (INCLUDES INCREASE)
0,67 FT
THICKNESS
1.75
WIDTH
2.25
LENGTH OF
FRAME
9
GB. EXT. EA.
END
3
VERTICAL LOADING
TYPICAL DISTANCE BTW. BF. COLUMNS=
DL Reduction Factor=
LL Reduction Factor=
TOTAL G.B. LENGTH (FT.)=
GRADE BEAM DL (KLF)=
(INCL. SOIL ABOVE G.B.
1.00
1.00
15
0.76
9 FT.
BF. COL. #
1
2
3
4
5
DL(K)
6
1.7
0
0
0
LL(K)
15.9
8.3
0
0
0
SNOW (K)
0
0
0
0
0
ADDITIONAL LOADING
LOAD NO.
1
2
3
4
5
DIST. FROM
END C1 (FT.)
0
0
0
0
0
DL(K)
0
0
0
0
0
LL(K)
0
0
0
0
0
SNOW (K)
0
0
0
0
0
LATERAL LOADING
LOAD#
1
2
3
4
5
LAT. FORCE
0
0
0
0
0
HT.A.F.F.(FT.)
0
0
0
0
0
PTOT=
MOT=
MR=
e=
L/6=
43.25 K
0.00 FT.K
270.80 FT.K
1.24 FT.
2.50 FT.
OVERALL STABILlTY= N/A
SOIL PRESSURE= 1.92 KSF O.K.
Maximum Shear= 13.12 kip Moment, Mu= 20.58 k-ft
fi Vc= 52.34 kip fc= 4500 psi
(Assumes d=Thick. - 4")
E:\Projects\06-034 Schubach Aviation T.I\GB Line 1
WISEMAN+ROHY Structural Engineers
== BRACED FRAME G.B. ==
Aug 2005
PROJECT: Schubach Aviation T.f.
LOCATION: Line 1
JOB NO: 06-034 4/13/2006 07:35:15"
CASE:DL+LL+Seismic
ALLOWABLE SOIL PRESSURE:
DISTANCE BWN. F.F. & T.O.GB.=
GRADE BEAM GEOMETRY (FT.)
4 KSF (INCLUDES INCREASE)
0.67 FT
THICKNESS
1.75
WIDTH
2.25
LENGTH OF
FRAME
9
GB. EXT. EA.
END
3
VERTICAL LOADING
TYPICAL DISTANCE BTW. BF. COLUMNS=
DL Reduction Factor=
LL Reduction Factor=
TOTAL G.B. LENGTH (FT.)=
GRADE BEAM DL (KLF)=
(INCL. SOIL ABOVE G.B.
1.00
1.00
15
0.76
9 FT.
BF. COL #
1
2
3
4
5
DL(K)
6
1.7
0
0
Q
LL(K)
15.9
8.3
0
0
Q
SNOW (K)
0
0
0
0
0
ADDITIONAL LOADING
LOAD NO.
1
2
3
4
5
DIST. FROM
END C1 (FT.)
0
0
0
0
0
DL(K)
0
0
0
0
0
LL(K)
0
0
0
0
0
SNOW (K)
0
0
0
0
0
LATERAL LOADING
LOAD#
1
2
3
4
5
LAT. FORCE
6.6
0
0
0
0
HT. A.F.F. (FT.)
11
0
0
0
0
PTOT=
MOT=
MR=
e=
L/6=
43.25 K
88.57 FT.K
270.80 FT.K
3.29 FT.
2.50 FT.Maximum
OVERALL STABILITY=
SOIL PRESSURE=
Shear= 22.15 kip
fi Vc= 52.34 kip
(Assumes d=Thick. - 4")
3.06
3.04 KSF O.K.
Moment, Mu= 34.93 k-ft
fc= 4500 psi
E:\Projects\06-034 Schubach Aviation T.I\GB Line 1
WISEMAN+ROHY Structural Engineers
== BRACED FRAME G.B. ==
Aug 2005
PROJECT: Schubach Aviation T.I.
LOCATION: Line 1
JOB NO: 06-034 4/13/2006 07:34:59
CASE:DL+Seismic
ALLOWABLE SOIL PRESSURE:
DISTANCE BWN. F.F. & T.O.GB.=
GRADE BEAM GEOMETRY (FT.)
4 KSF (INCLUDES INCREASE)
0.67 FT
THICKNESS
1.75
WIDTH
2.25
LENGTH OF
FRAME
9
GB. EXT. EA.
END
3
VERTICAL LOADING
TYPICAL DISTANCE BTW. BF. COLUMNS=
DL Reduction Factor=
LL Reduction Factor?
TOTAL G.B. LENGTH (FT.)=
GRADE BEAM DL (KLF)=
(INCL. SOIL ABOVE G.B.)
1.00
0.00
15
0.76
9 FT.
BF. COL. #
1
2
3
4
5
DL(K)
6
1.7
0
0
0
LL(K)
15.9
8.3
0
0
0
SNOW (K)
0
0
0
0
0
ADDITIONAL LOADING
LOAD NO.
1
2
3
4
5
DIST. FROM
END C1 (FT.)
0
0
0
0
0
DL(K)
0
0
0
0
0
LL(K)
0
0
0
0
0
SNOW (K)
0
0
0
0
0
LATERAL LOADING
LOAD#
1
2
3
4
5
LAT. FORCE
6.6
0
0
0
0
HT. A.F.F. (FT.)
11
0
0
0
0
PTOT=
MOT=
MR=
e=
L/6=
19.05 K
88.57 FT.K
123.50 FT.K
5.67 FT.
2.50 FT.Maximum
OVERALL STABILITY
SOIL PRESSURE=
Shear= 17.98 kip
fi Vc= 52.34 kip
(Assumes d=Thick. - 4")
1.39
3.08 KSF O.K.
Moment, Mu= 30.93 k-ft
fc= 4500 psi
E:\Projects\06-034 Schubach Aviation T.I\GB Line 1
WISEMAN+ROHY Structural Engineers
== BRACED FRAME G.B. ==
Aug 2005
PROJECT: Schubach Aviation T.I.
LOCATION: tine 1
JOB NO: 06-034 4/13/2006 07:34:48
CASE:.9DL+Seismic
ALLOWABLE SOIL PRESSURE:
DISTANCE BWN. F.F. & T.O.GB.=
GRADE BEAM GEOMETRY (FT.
4 KSF (INCLUDES INCREASE)
0.67 FT
THICKNESS
1.75
WIDTH
2.25
LENGTH OF
FRAME
9
GB. EXT. EA.
END
3
VERTICAL LOADING
TYPICAL DISTANCE BTW. BF. COLUMNS^
DL Reduction Factor=
LL Reduction Factor=
TOTAL G.B. LENGTH (FT.)=
GRADE BEAM DL (KLF)=
(INCL SOIL ABOVE G.B.
0.90
0.00
15
0.68
9 FT.
BF. COL. #
1
2
3
4
5
DL(K)
6
1.7
0
0
0
LL(K)
15.9
8.3
0
0
0
SNOW (K)
0
0
0
0
0
ADDITIONAL LOADING
LOAD NO.
1
2
3
4
5
DIST. FROM
END C1 (FT.)
0
0
0
0
0
DL(K)
0
0
0
0
0
LL(K>
0
0
0
0
0
SNOW (K)
0
0
0
0
0
LATERAL LOADING
LOAD#
1
2
3
4
5
LAT. FORCE
6.6
0
0
0
0
HT. A.F.F. (FT.)
11
0
0
0
0
PTOT=
MOT=
MR=
e=
U6=
17.14 K
88.57 FT.K
111.15 FT.K
6.18 FT.
2.50 FT.Maximum
OVERALL STABILITY^
SOIL PRESSURE=
Shear= 19.75 kip
fi Vc= 52.34 kip
(Assumes d=Thick. - 4")
1.25
3.86 KSF O.K.
Moment, Mu=
fc=
36.54 k-ft
4500 psi
E:\Projects\06-034 Schubach Aviation T.I\GB Line 1
AWISEMAN+ROHY Structural Engineers
== BRACED FRAME G.B. ==
Aug 2005
PROJECT: Schubach Aviation T.I.
LOCATION: Line 3
JOB NO: 06-034 4/13/2006 07:44:54
CASE:DL+LL
ALLOWABLE SOIL PRESSURE:
DISTANCE BWN. F.F. & T.O.GB.=
GRADE BEAM GEOMETRY (FT.)
3 KSF (INCLUDES INCREASE)
0.67 FT
THICKNESS
1.75
WIDTH
3.75
LENGTH OF
FRAME
9
GB. EXT. EA.
END
3
VERTICAL LOADING
TYPICAL DISTANCE BTW. BF. COLUMNS^
DL Reduction Factor=
LL Reduction Factor=
TOTAL G.B. LENGTH (FT.)=
GRADE BEAM DL (KLF)=
(INCL SOIL ABOVE G.B.)
1.00
1.00
15
i.26
9 FT.
BF. COL. #
1
2
3
4
5
DL(K)
17.6
1.5
0
0
0
LL(K)
39.9
16.3
0
0
0
SNOW (K)
0
0
0
0
0
ADDITIONAL LOADING
LOAD NO.
1
2
3
4
5
DIST. FROM
END C1 (FT.)
0
0
0
0
0
DL(K)
0
0
0
0
0
t-L(K)
0
0
0
0
0
SNOW (K)
0
0
0
0
0
LATERAL LOADING
LOAD#
1
2
3
4
5
LAT. FORCE
0
0
0
0
0
HT. A.F.F. (FT.)
0
0
0
0
0
PTOT=
MOT=
MR=
fl""1
U6=
94.21 K
0.00 FT.K
527.93 FT.K
1.90 FT.
2.50 FT.
OVERALL STABILITY^ N/A
SOIL PRESSURE= 2.95 KSF O.K.
Maximum Shear= 36.45 kip Moment, Mu= 57.00 k-ft
fi Vc= 87.24 kip fc= 4500 psi
(Assumes d=Thick. - 4")
E:\Projects\06-034 Schubach Aviation T.I\GB Line 3
WISEMAN+ROHY Structural Engineers
== BRACED FRAME G.B. ==
Aug 2005
PROJECT: Schubach Aviation T.I.
LOCATION: Line 3
JOB NO: 06-034 4/13/2006 07:37:42
CASE:DL+LL+Seismic
ALLOWABLE SOIL PRESSURE:
DISTANCE BWN. F.F. &T.O.GB.=
GRADE BEAM GEOMETRY (FT.)
4 KSF (INCLUDES INCREASE)
0.67 FT
THICKNESS
1.75
WIDTHv;
LENGTH OF
FRAME
9
GB. EXT. EA.
END
3
VERTICAL LOADING
TYPICAL DISTANCE BTW. BF. COLUMNS=
DL Reduction Factor=
LL Reduction Factor=
TOTAL G.B. LENGTH (FT.)=
GRADE BEAM DL (KLF)=
(INCL. SOIL ABOVE G.B.)
1.00
1.00
15
i.18
9 FT.
BF. COL. #
1
2
3
4
5
DL(K)
17.6
1.5
0
0
0
LL(K)
39.9
16.3
0
0
0
SNOW (K)
0
0
0
0
0
ADDITIONAL LOADING
LOAD NO.
1
2
3
4
5
DIST. FROM
END C1 (FT.)
0
0
0
0
0
DL(K)
0
0
0
0
0
LL(K)
0
0
0
0
0
SNOW (K)
0
0
0
0
0
LATERAL LOADING
LOAD#
1
2
3
4
5
LAT. FORCE
6.3
0
0
0
0
HT.A.F.F. (FT.)
11
0
0
0
0
PTOT=
MOT=
MR=
Q»"
U6=
92.95 K
84.55 FT.K
518.48 FT.K
2.83 FT.
2.50 FT.Maximum
OVERALL STABILITY=
SOIL PRESSURE=
Shear= 44.84 kip
fiVc= 81.42 kip
(Assumes d=Thick. - 4")
6.13
3.79 KSF O.K.
Moment, Mu=
fc=
70.24 k-ft
4500 psi
E:\Projects\06-034 Schubach Aviation T.I\GB Line 3
WISEMAN+ROHY Structural Engineers
== BRACED FRAME G.B. ==
Aug2005
PROJECT: Schubach Aviation T.I.
LOCATION: Line 3
JOB NO: 06-034 4/13/2006 07:38:01
CASE:DL+Seismic
ALLOWABLE SOIL PRESSURE:
DISTANCE BWN. F.F. & T.O.GB.=
GRADE BEAM GEOMETRY (FT.)
4 KSF (INCLUDES INCREASE)
0.67 FT
THICKNESS
1.75
WIDTH
x-3^
LENGTH OF
FRAME
9
GB. EXT. EA.
END
3
VERTICAL LOADING
TYPICAL DISTANCE BTW. BF. COLUMNS=
DL Reduction Factor=
LL Reduction Factor=
TOTAL G.B. LENGTH (FT.)=
GRADE BEAM DL (KLF)=
(INCL SOIL ABOVE G.B.
1.00
0.00
15
i.18
9 FT.
BF. COL. #
1
2
3
4
5
DL(K>
17.6
1.5
0
0
0
LL(K)
39.9
16.3
0
0
0
SNOW (K)
0
0
0
0
0
ADDITIONAL LOADING
LOAD NO.
1
2
3
4
5
DIST. FROM
END C1 (FT.)
0
0
0
0
0
DL(K)
0
0
0
0
0
LL(K)
0
0
0
0
0
SNOW (K)
0
0
0
0
0
LATERAL LOADING
LOAD#
1
2
3
4
5
LAT. FORCE
6.3
0
0
0
0
HT. A.F.F. (FT.)
11
0
0
0
0
PTOT=
MOT=
MR=
e=
L/6=
36.75 K
84.55 FT.K
203.18 FT.K
4.27 FT.
2.50 FT.Maximum
OVERALL STABILITY^
SOIL PRESSURE=
Shear= 22.00 kip
fiVc= 81.42 kip
(Assumes d=Thick. - 4")
2.40
2.17 KSF O.K.
Moment, Mu=
fc=
35.47 k-ft
4500 psi
E:\Projects\06-034 Schubach Aviation T.f\GB Line 3
WISEMAN+ROHY Structural Engineers
== BRACED FRAME G.B. ==
Aug 2005
PROJECT: Schubach Aviation T.I.
LOCATION: Line 3
JOB NO: 06-034 4/13/2006 07:38:11
CASE:.9DL-*-Seismic
ALLOWABLE SOIL PRESSURE:
DISTANCE BWN. F.F. & T.O.GB.=
GRADE BEAM GEOMETRY (FT.)
4 KSF (INCLUDES INCREASE)
0.67 FT
THICKNESS
1.75
WIDTH
>5-
LENGTH OF
FRAME
9
GB. EXT. EA.
END
3
VERTICAL LOADING
TYPICAL DISTANCE BTW. BF. COLUMNS=
DL Reduction Factor^
LL Reduction Factor=
TOTAL G.B. LENGTH (FT.)=
GRADE BEAM DL (KLF)=
(INCL. SOIL ABOVE G.B.
0.90
0.00
15
1.06
9 FT.
BF. COL. #
1
2
3
4
5
DL(K)
17.6
1.5
0
0
0
LL(K)
39.9
16.3
0
0
0
SNOW (K)
0
0
0
0
0
ADDITIONAL LOADING
LOAD NO.
1
2
3
4
5
DIST. FROM
ENDC1 (FT.)
0
0
0
0
0
DL(K)
0
0
0
0
0
LL(K)
0
0
0
0
0
SNOW (K)
0
0
0
0
0
LATERAL LOADING
LOAD#
1
2
3
4
5
LAT. FORCE
6.3
0
0
0
0
HT. A.F.F. (FT.)
11
0
0
0
0
PTOT=
MOT=
MR=
e=
L/6=
33.08 K
84.55 FT.K
182.86 FT.K
4.53 FT.
2.50 FT.Maximum
OVERALL STABILITY=
SOIL PRESSURED
Shear= 21.47 kip
fiVc= 81.42 kip
(Assumes d=Thick. - 4")
2.16
2.12 KSF O.K.
Moment, Mu= 34.82 k-ft
fc= 4500 psi
E:\Projects\06-034 Schubach Aviation T.I\GB Line 3
WISEMAN+ROHY Structural Engineers
== BRACED FRAME G.B. —
Aug 2005
PROJECT: Schubach Aviation T.I.
LOCATION: Line 7
JOB NO: 06-034 4/13/2006 07:43:34
CASE:DL+LL
ALLOWABLE SOIL PRESSURE:
DISTANCE BWN. F.F. & T.O.GB.=
GRADE BEAM GEOMETRY (FT.)
3 KSF {INCLUDES INCREASE)
0.67 FT
THICKNESS
1.75
WIDTH
2.16
LENGTH OF
FRAME
9
GB. EXT. EA.
END
3.75
VERTICAL LOADING
TYPICAL DISTANCE BTW. BF. COLUMNS=
DL Reduction Factor=
LL Reduction Factor=
TOTAL G.B. LENGTH (FT.)=
GRADE BEAM DL (KLF)=
(INCL. SOIL ABOVE G.B.}
1.00
1.00
16.5
0.73
9 FT.
BF. COL. #
1
2
3
4
5
DL(K)
6.8
1.8
0
0
0
LL(K)
17.9
9.3
0
0
0
SNOW (K)
0
0
0
0
0
ADDITIONAL LOADING
LOAD NO.
1
2
3
4
5
DIST. FROM
ENDC1 (FT.)
0
0
0
0
0
DL(K)
0
0
0
0
0
LL(K)
0
0
0
0
0
SNOW (K)
0
0
0
0
0
LATERAL LOADING
LOAD#
1
2
3
4
5
LAT. FORCE
0
0
0
0
0
HT. A.F.F. (FT.)
0
0
0
0
0
PTOT=
MOT=
MR=
e=
U6=
47.78 K
0.00 FT.K
333.00 FT.K
1.28 FT.
2.75 FT.
OVERALL STABILITY^ N/A
SOIL PRESSURE= 1.97 KSF O.K.
Maximum Shear= 15.94 kip Moment, Mu= 31.47 k-ft
fi Vc= 50.25 kip fc= 4500 psi
(Assumes d=Thick. - 4")
E:\Projects\06-034 Schubach Aviation T.I\GB Line 7
WISEMAN+ROHY Structural Engineers
== BRACED FRAME G.B. ==
Aug 2005 __
PROJECT: Schubach Aviation T.I
LOCATION: Line 7
JOB NO: 06-034 4/13/2006 07:43:07
CASE:DL+LL+Seismic
ALLOWABLE SOIL PRESSURE:
DISTANCE BWN. F.F. &T.O.GB.=
GRADE BEAM GEOMETRY (FT.)
4 KSF {INCLUDES INCREASE)
0.67 FT
THICKNESS
1.75
WIDTH
2.16
LENGTH OF
FRAME
9
GB. EXT. EA.
END
3.75 DL Reduction Factor=
LL Reduction Factors
TOTAL G.B. LENGTH (FT.)=
GRADE BEAM DL (KLF)=
1.00
1.00
16.5
0.73
VERTICAL LOADING
TYPICAL DISTANCE BTW. BF. COLUMNS=
(INCL. SOIL ABOVE G.B.)
9 FT.
BF. COL. #
1
2
3
4
5
DL(K)
6.8
1.8
0
0
0
LL(K)
17.9
9.3
0
0
0
SNOW (K)
0
0
0
0
0
ADDITIONAL LOADING
LOAD NO.
1
2
3
4
5
D1ST. FROM
END C1 (FT.)
0
0
0
0
0
DL(K)
0
0
0
0
0
LL(K)
0
0
0
0
0
SNOW (K)
0
0
0
0
0
LATERAL LOADING
LOAD#
1
2
3
4
5
LAT. FORCE
7.9
0
0
0
0
HT. A.F.F. (FT.)
11
0
0
0
0
PTOT=
MOT=
MR=
e=
U6=
47.78 K
106.02 FT.K
333.00 FT.K
3.50 FT.
2.75 FT.Maximum
OVERALL STABILITY=
SOIL PRESSURED
Shear= 26.76 kip
fi Vc= 50.25 kip
(Assumes d=Thick. - 4")
3.14
3.10 KSF O.K.
Moment, Mu=
fc=
53.07 k-ft
4500 psi
E:\Projects\06-034 Schubach Aviation T.I\GB Line 7
WISEMAN+ROHY Structural Engineers
== BRACED FRAME G.B. —
Aug 2005
PROJECT: Schubach Aviation T.I.
LOCATION. Line 7
JOB NO: 06-034 4/13/2006 07:42:59
CASE:DL+Seismic
ALLOWABLE SOIL PRESSURE:
DISTANCE BWN. F.F. & T.O.GB.=
GRADE BEAM GEOMETRY (FT.)
4 KSF (INCLUDES INCREASE)
0.67 FT
THICKNESS
1.75
WIDTH
2.16
LENGTH OF
FRAME
9
GB. EXT. EA.
END
3.75
VERTICAL LOADING
TYPICAL DISTANCE BTW. BF. COLUMNS=
DL Reduction Factor=
LL Reduction Factor=
TOTAL G.B. LENGTH (FT.)=
GRADE BEAM DL (KLF)=
(INCL. SOIL ABOVE G.B.
1.00
0.00
16.5
0.73
9 FT.
BF. COL. #
1
2
3
4
5
DL(K)
6.8
1.8
0
0
0
LL(K)
17.9
9.3
0
0
0
SNOW (K)
0
0
0
0
0
ADDITIONAL LOADING
LOAD NO.
1
2
3
4
5
DIST. FROM
END C1 (FT.)
0
0
0
0
0
DL(K)
0
0
0
0
0
LL(K)
0
0
0
0
0
SNOW (K)
0
0
0
0
0
LATERAL LOADING
LOAD#
1
2
3
4
5
LAT. FORCE
7.9
0
0
0
0
HT. A.F.F. (FT.)
11
0
0
0
0
PTOT=
MOT=
MR=
e=
L/6=
20.58 K
106.02 FT.K
147.30 FT.K
6.24 FT.
2.75 FT.Maximum
OVERALL STABILITY^
SOIL PRESSURED
Shear= 20.91 kip
fi Vc= 50.25 kip
(Assumes d=Thick. - 4")
1.39
3.17 KSF O.K.
Moment, Mu=
fc=
46.20 k-ft
4500 psi
E:\Projects\06-034 Schubach Aviation T.I\GB Line 7
W1SEMAN+ROHY Structural Engineers
== BRACED FRAME G.B. ==
Aug 2005
PROJECT: Schubach Aviation!.!.
LOCATION: Line?
JOB NO: 06-034 4/13/2006 07:42:41
CASE:,9DL+Seismic
ALLOWABLE SOIL PRESSURE:
DISTANCE BWN. F.F. & T.O.GB.=
GRADE BEAM GEOMETRY (FT.)
4 KSF (INCLUDES INCREASE)
0.67 FT
THICKNESS
1.75
WIDTH
2.16
LENGTH OF
FRAME
9
GB. EXT. EA.
END
3.75
VERTICAL LOADING
TYPICAL DISTANCE BTW. BF. COLUMNS=
DL Reduction Factor=
LL Reduction Factor=
TOTAL G.B. LENGTH (FT.)=
GRADE BEAM DL (KLF)=
(INCL SOIL ABOVE G.B.
0.90
0.00
16.5
0.65
9 FT.
BF. COL. #
1
2
3
4
5
DL(K)
6.8
1.8
0
0
0
LL(K)
17.9
9.3
0
0
0
SNOW (K)
0
0
0
0
0
ADDITIONAL LOADING
LOAD NO.
1
2
3
4
5
DIST. FROM
END C1 (FT.)
0
0
0
0
0
DL(K)
0
0
0
0
0
LL(K)
0
0
0
0
0
SNOW (K)
0
0
0
0
0
LATERAL LOADING
LOAD#
1
2
3
4
5
LAT. FORCE
7.9
0
0
0
0
HT. A.F.F. (FT.)
11
0
0
0
0
PTOT=
MOT=
MR=
e=
L/6=
18.52 K
106.02 FT.K
132.57 FT.K
6.82 FT.
2.75 FT.Maximum
OVERALL STABILITY
SOIL PRESSURE=
Shear= 22.08 kip
fi Vc= 50.25 kip
(Assumes d=Thick. - 4")
1.25
3.99 KSF O.K.
Moment, Mu= 53.72 k-ft
fc= 4500 psi
E:\Projects\06-034 Schubach Aviation T.l\GB Line 7
WISEMAN + ROHY
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS
BY DATE PROJECT ,T.SHEET NO. ____ OF
JOB NO. PL -
K
2.s
\\V
WISEMAN + ROHY
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS
BY D ^ DATE PROJECT SHEET NO. OF
JOB NO.
U
x U2
T<i3
ffi
Company : Nowak & Wiseman
Designer : BJD
Job Number: 06-034 Schubach Aviation T.I.
April 13, 2006
Checked By:
Sketch
D
2.875 ft
A) 1
AX
B
4J4-1
D
6.75 ft
Details
B '
A
|
— jj
#5@14.4 in Z
OJ1-1
u>
#5@13 in
•*
\X "H
in*
J3(
c-H
«=*=
G
|6 in H"
Footing Elevation
c
-1-
r"
CN
c
6.75 ft
Bottom Rebar Plan
B
y\
/
»
•%
#5@18.5 in
#5@21.67in
6.75 ft
XDir. Steel: 1.28 in2 (min){5 #5)
Z Dir. Steel: .98 in2 (min){4 #5)
Top Rebar Plan
12 in
16#3
Pedestal Rebar Plan
RISAFoot Version 2.0 [E:\Projects\06-034 Schubach Aviation T.I\6-B footing.rft]Page 1
Company
Designer
Job Number
Nowak & Wiseman
BJD
06-034 Schubach Aviation T.I.
April13, 2006
Checked By:
Geometry, Materials and Criteria
Length
Width
Thickness
Height
: 6.75 ft
:6ft
:21 in
:1 in
eX
eZ
pX
PZ
:9in
:0 in
:12in
:12in
Gross Allow. Bearing
Concrete Weight
Concrete f c
Design Code
: 3000 psf
: 145 pcf
:4.5ksi
:ACI 318-02
Steel fy
Minimum Steel
Maximum Steel
60ksi
.0018
.0075
Footing Top Bar Cover :3.5 in
Footing Bottom Bar Cover : 3.5 in
Pedestal Longitudinal Bar Cover : 1.5 in
Loads
Overturning Safety Factor ; 1.5
Coefficient of Friction : 0.3
Passive Resistance of Soil :0 k
Phi for Flexure :0.9
Phi for Shear :0.75
Phi for Bearing :0.65
Vx(k)
DL
LL
MX (k-ft)Mz (k-ft) Overburden (psf)
18
42
100
+Over
RISAFoot Version 2.0 [E:\Projects\06-034 Schubach Aviation T.I\6-B footing.rft]Page 2
Company
Designer
Job Number
So/7 Bearing
Description
Nowak & Wiseman
BJD
06-034 Schubach Aviation T.I.
Categories and Factors Gross Allow.(psf) Max Bearing (psf)
April 13,2006
Checked By:
Max/Allowable Ratio
ASCE 2.4.1-1
ASCE2.4.1-2
ASCE 2.4.1 -3a
ASCE 2.4.1 -3b
ASCE 2.4.1 -3c
ASCE 2.4.1 -3d
ASCE 2.4.1 -4
ASCE 2.4.1 -5
1DL
1DL+1LL
1DL+1WL
1DL+.7EL
1DL+.75LL+.75WL
1DL+.75LL+.7EL
.6DL+1WL
.6DL+.7EL
3000
3000
3000
3000
3000 __^
3000
3000
3000
11 27.73 (A)
2942.54 (A)
11 27.73 (A)
1127.73 (A)
2488.84 (A)
2488.84 (A)
676.637 (A)
676.637 (A)
.376
.981
.376
.376
.83
.83
.226
.226
D
1DL
QA: 1127.73 psf
QB: 1127.73 psf
QC: 464.318 psf
QD: 464.318 psf
NAZ: -1 in
NAX:122.393in
1DL+1LL
QA: 2942.54 psf
QB: 2942.54 psf
QC: 723.578 psf
QD: 723.578 psf
NAZ: -1 in
NAX: 95.478 in
1DL+1WL
QA: 1127.73 psf
QB: 1127.73 psf
QC: 464.318 psf
QD: 464.318 psf
NAZ:-1 in
NAX: 122.393 in
1DL+.7EL
QA: 1127.73 psf
QB: 1127.73 psf
QC: 464.318 psf
QD: 464.318 psf
NAZ: -1 in
NAX: 122.393 in
1DL+.75LL+.75WL
QA: 2488.84 psf
QB: 2488.84 psf
QC: 658.763 psf
QD: 658.763 psf
NAZ: -1 in
NAX: 97.917 in
1DL+.75LL+.7EL
QA: 2488.84 psf
QB: 2488.84 psf
QC: 658.763 psf
QD: 658.763 psf
NAZ: -1 in
NAX: 97.917 in
.6DL+1WL
QA: 676.637 psf
QB: 676.637 psf
QC: 278.591 psf
QD: 278.591 psf
NAZ: -1 in
NAX: 122.393 in
.6DL+.7EL
QA: 676.637 psf
QB: 676.637 psf
QC: 278.591 psf
QD: 278.591 psf
NAZ:-1 in
NAX: 122.393 in
Footing Flexure Design (Bottom Bars)
Description Categories and Factors Mu-XX (k-ft)Z Dir As (in2) Mu-ZZ (k-ft) XDirAsQn2)
AC! 9-1
ACI 9-2
ACI 9-3
IBC 16-5
IBC 16-6
1.4DL+1.7LL
1 .05DL+1 .275LL+1 .275WL
.9DL+1.3WL
1.2DL+1LL+1EL
.9DL+1EL
59.155
44.367
9.925
38.949
9.925
.769
.576
.128
.505
.128
44.293
33.22
7.432
29.164
7.432
.575
.431
.096
.378
.096
Footing Flexure Design (Top Bars)
Description Categories and Factors Mu-XX (k-ft) Z Dir As (in2) Mu-ZZ (k-ft) X Dir As (in2)
SW+OVER 1SW+1OVER 5.179 .067
RISAFoot Version 2.0 [E:\Projects\06-034 Schubach Aviation T.I\6-B footing.rft]Page 3
Company :
Designer :
Job Number :
Nowak & Wiseman
BJD
06-034 Schubach Aviation T.I.
April 13, 2006
Checked By:
Footing Shear Check
Two Way (Punching) Vc: 538.438k One Way (X Dir. Cut) Vc 166.028k One Way (Z Dir. Cut) Vc: 186.782k
Description Categories and Factors
Punching
Vu(k) Vu/^zA/c
X Dir. Cut
Vu(k)
Z Dir. Cut
Vu(k) Vu/^A/c
ACI 9-1
ACI 9-2
ACI 9-3
IBC 16-5
IBC 16-6
1.4DL+1.7LL
1 .05DL+1 .275LL+1 .275WL
.9DL+1.3WL
1.2DL+1LL-MEL
.9DL+1EL
79.857
59.893
13.399
52.58
13.399
.198
.148
.033
.13
.033
20.65
15.488
3.465
13.597
3.465
.166
.124
.028
.109
.028
13.968
10.476
2.344
9.197
2.344
.1
.075
.017
.066
.017
Pedestal Design
Shear Check Results (Envelope):
Shear Along X
Shear Along Z
Direction
Direction
Vc:15
Vc:15
.999k
.999k
Vs:21
Vs:21
.951 k
.951 k
Vu:
Vu:
Ok
Ok
Vu/0
Vu/^
Vn:
Vn:
0
0
0: .75
Shear Bars: #3@6 in
Bending Check Results (Envelope):
Unity Check: .265 Pn: 520.055 k
Pu : 96.612k Mux:0 k-ft
Mnoz :NA Phi: .7
Longitudinal Bars: 16 #3
Mnx: NA
Muz: 0 k-ft
Parme Beta: .65
Mnz: NA
Mnox:NA
Compression Development Length Pedestal Bars (Envelope):
Lreq.: 6.75 in Lpro.: 15.875 in Lreq./Lpro.: .425
Concrete Bearing Check (Vertical Loads Only)
Bearing Be: 1101.6k
Description Categories and Factors Bearing Bu (k) Bearing Bu/0Bc
ACI 9-1
ACI 9-2
ACI 9-3
IBC 16-5
IBC 16-6
1.4DL+1.7LL
1 .05DL+1 .275LL+1 .275WL
.9DL-M.3WL
1.2DL+1LL+1EL
.9DL+1EL
96.617
72.463
16.211
63.614
16.211
.135
.101
.023
.089
.023
Overturning Check (Service)
Description Categories and Factors Mo-XX (k-ft) Ms-XX (k-ft) Mo-ZZ (k-ft) Ms-ZZ (k-ft) -QSF-XX OSF-ZZ
ASCE 2.4.1-1
ASCE 2.4.1-2
ASCE 2.4.1-3a
ASCE 2,4.1 -3b
ASCE2.4.1-3c
ASCE2.4.1-3d
ASCE 2.4.1 -4
ASCE 2.4.1-5
1DL
1DL+1LL
1DL+1WL
1DL+.7EL
1 DL+.75LL+.75WL
1DL+.75LL+.7EL
.6DL+1WL
.6DL+.7EL
.297
.297
.297
.297
.297
.297
.178
.178
109.103
250.853
109.103
109.103
215.416
215.416
65,462
65.462
.33
.33
.33
.33
.33
.33
.198
.198
110.481
267.981
110.481
110.481
228.606
228.606
66.288
66.288
167.699
345.424
567.699
167.699
'25.993
b5.993
367.699
367.699
335.107
312.832
335.107
335.107
393.401
393.401
335.107
335.107
Mo-XX: Governing Overturning Moment about AD or BC
Ms-XX: Governing Stablizing Moment about AD or BC
OSF-XX: Ratio of Ms-XX to Mo-XX
RISAFoot Version 2.0 [E:\Projects\06-034 Schubach Aviation T.I\6-B footing.rft]Page 4
Company
Designer
Job Number
Nowak & Wiseman
BJD
06-034 Schubach Aviation T.I.
April 13, 2006
Checked Bv:
Sliding Check (Service)
Description Categories and Factors Va-XX (k)Vr-XX (k)Va-ZZ (k) Vr-ZZ (k) SR-XX SR-ZZ
ASCE 2.4.1-1
ASCE2.4.1-2
ASCE2.4.1-3a
ASCE2.4.1-3b
ASCE2.4.1-3C
ASCE 2.4.1 -3d
ASCE 2.4.1 -4
ASCE 2.4.1-5
1DL
1DL+1LL
1DL+1WL
1DL+.7EL
1DL+.75LL+.75WL
1DL+.75LL+.7EL
.6DL+1WL
.6DL+.7EL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
r 0
9.672
22.272
9.672
9.672
19.122
19.122
5.803
5.803
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9.672
22.272
9.672
9.672
19.122
19.122
5.803
5.803
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Va-XX: Applied Lateral Force to Cause Sliding Along XX Axis
Vr-XX: Resisting Lateral Force Against Sliding Along XX Axis
SR-XX: Ratio of Vr-XX to Va-XX
RISAFoot Version 2.0 [E:\Projects\06-034 Schubach Aviation T.I\6-B footing.rft]Page 5