The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2101 FARADAY AVE; ; CB991270; PermitJ ~v-,-5 ? :f{,· (\ e .. _\L.-\V 05/26/1999 City of Carlsbad Commercial/Industrial Permit Permit No: CB991270 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 438-3101 Job Address: 2101 FARADAY AV CBAD Permit Type: Tl Sub Type: COMM Parcel No: 2120700100 Lot#: 0 Status: Valuation: $1,181,960.00 Construction Type: NEW Applied: Occupancy Group: 28 Reference #: Entered By: Project Title: LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES Plan Approved: 45,460 SF IMPROVEMENT W/2000 SF MECH. YARD Issued: Inspect Area: Applicant: SMITH CONSUL TING ARCHITECTS STE 200 12220 EL CAMINO REAL SAN DIEGO CA 92121 619 673 4777 Total Fees: Building Permit . Add'I Building Permit Fee i Plan Check · Add'I Plan Check Fee Plan Check Discount Strong Motion Fee Park Fee LFM Fee Bridge Fee BTD #2 Fee BTD #3 Fee Renewal Fee Add'I Renewal Fee Other Building Fee Pot. Water Con. Fee Meter Size Add'I Pot. Water Con. Fee .,, / "'.,~-~~_:;::;:::;;-:-~/ \ \ V/ I J ~"r:><~~-.-/1' \ ; / \ (i ., /$3,859.8~---.... ____ ~af! .. wij;efcon.,/~ee'?;::::·\ · \~~~) ; $0.0J) ~ ~~fer,.Size /sf,\ '<"·,// \ $2,~08.Bpy; \1'f,S,9dt'Recl~at~f €<:m. Fee : c-'\ $0/00 ~ V@FID Paf0ff F, ee• I \ \ "'~o.oo'~ ~#FF ·u '~? / • \.<I.' ~.). _.,..,. M CL 2;, I / \ \p248~-1/ ~ t8RFc(OfJ;.>--Fand). / \ ~$0,.00 \'License Tax / · \ /0.......... $0:-06 INCORf[S_i'Bense Tax,(CFD'i=und) I \ I / \,' ':>. 1'-'' 2 / ' {:, ' I \..\ //~0.00,..__ \f'r~Jmpaqt(\e~\ r-· . _.,..,_,_ <l $0,~oo ,-., ·-TfafficJmpact,(OcD" Fund) l' /, I/ r \ \ -\ I.,, / $Q-QO; 1~FM?i, T-r~n~l?Ortati~,.Fee "-,,$0:00; if-LW,MS:ING TOJA[ $0:00 EtECTRICAl.:TOTAL $0.00--·-MEeHANICAL TOTAL $0.00 Master Drainage Fee: Sewer Fee: $0.00 TOTAL PERMIT FEES ISSUED 04/01/1999 JM 05/24/1999 05/26/1999 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,034.00 $0.00 $470.00 $69.00 $510.00 $218.50 $0.00 $2,280.72 $11,199.17 FINAL APPROVAL Date: //~ Clearance: _____ _ NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "Imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as "fees/exactions." You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capactiy changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project. NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which ou have reviousl been iven a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has reviousl otheiwise ex ired. CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (760) 438-1161 02 ~A.LLL¾ [1~ PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad CA 92009 (760) 438-1161 EST. VAL. -+,~-4--+-:,-1-~'---"'"=--:::--....,..,.. --=--~"""""ra Business Name (at this address) ?A-FLS6A-IJ Bl?Be-MCH DBJT/5J2..., Lot No. Subdivision Name/Number Unit No. Phase No. Total # of units Sl 53 04101/99 0001 81 Proposed Use C-PRHT 02 2571-00 #of Stories # of Bedrooms # of Bathrooms Telephone# Fax# Name Address ~ 1 City ~~~~ ·~, I~:!: IH6i 1Mer 5~ ?2('kt . , . 7 l;z__,, I~ lj .. State/Zip Telephone # (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law [Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code] or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged ~ption,;,,y vie~~ Section 7031.5 by any applica ~fora z'._rrbj%~;an~y of t mor~h:n five wars 12£]). Name Address City Sta~e/ 1} .I\ ,. !:'~one # ·· '22· State License # __________ License Class __________ City Bust,,ess Licenstff 1 :st:tJ IQ l ?- Designer Name State License # 6: Address City Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: State/Zip Telephone D I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. 0 I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is :~:~~:~c:~o:;:~:s cl4Hi.JZlT~A/e /(a5J9Jttt'~MfA#t Policy No. 100113~/7CJ<1,/9 39 Expiration Date ¥/99 (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($1001 OR LESS) D CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. ntractor's License Law for the following reason: 0 I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). 0 I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). D I am exempt under Section ______ Business and Professions Code for this reason: 1. I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. 0 YES ONO 2. I (have/ have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. 3. I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): 4. I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone number/ contractors license number): _____________________________________________ _ 5. I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the w~rk indicated (include name / address / phone number/ type of work): __________________________________ ...., ____________________ _ PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE ______________________ _ [00~~$l'SECTION F0BVNON-llESIDEl(TfAL BUILDING PEaMITS,ONLY, , Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materjals registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? 0 YES D NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? 0 YES O NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? D YES D NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. ir~lfi'~ONSTRV~ON:Li!I.PING AGi!I.CY I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097(i) Civil Code). LENDER'S NAME ----------------1¥ ii 0 i RP U CAN1'. 'CE RTi A® 1ifW iii gji ;! , .. I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the Citt of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the Building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 365 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the erk_ is c~enced for a period of 1 80 days (Section 106.4.4 Uniform Building Code). ~! . APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE ~ ~,If--DATE ~Li f I WHITE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance Ust 1 -Permit-Type From the following list, determine the permit-type that best describes the work you propose to do. Please put the code of that permit-type in the blank at the top of the page on the front of this application. Residential permits (only) also require the identification of the structure-type to be associated with the permit. Choose a structw-e-type from "List 2 -Structure-Types" and put its code in the appropriate blank on the front of this application. Residential Permits Code Description APT Aoartments -new construction. CONDO Condominiwns -new construction. CVNNR Conversion; Convert all· or a portion of a non-residential building to residential use, creating one or more new residential units. . CVNRN Conversion. Convert one or more residences in a building to non-residential usage. CVNRR Conversion. Increase or reduce the number of dwelling units in a residential structw-e through interior modifications (i.e.: a four bedroom house converted to a duplex, with 2 bedrooms each). DEMO Demolition permit. (Also soecify type of structw-e from List 2). DUP Duplex -new construction. MOHO Mobile home, renovation, repair, or addition of accessory structw-e not yielding a new living unit. MOHON Mobile home, pre-fabricated house, or trailer installed (plumbed, wired) in a mobile home park (see distinction from single-family residence, below). RAD Residential addition/alteration, creating no new dwelling unit(s). RREISSUE Residential permit re-issue. RREPAIR Residential building repair. Damage, fire, etc. RREPI.ACE Residential building replacement (no additional units). SFA Single-family, attached -new construction. A one-family house attached to one or more other houses, with one or more common walls extending from foundation to roof at, or forming, a lot line. Has own plumbing and heating system (e.g.: townhouse, row house, half-plex) SFD Single-family, detached -new construction: A one-family house with open area on all four sides. May have an attached or detached garage, or a business. May be a detached •granny flat". May be a mobile home or trailer on an individual lot, but not in a mobile home park. Non-Residential/ Accessory Permits Code Description COM Commercial structure, new construction. CREISSUE Commercial permit re-issue. CREPAIR Commercial building -repair. Damage, fire, etc. CREPI.ACE Commercial building -replacement. CTI Commercial tenant improvement. DEMO Demolition permit. ELEC Electrical permit, for electrical work only. HOTEL Hotel or motel (including Managed Living Unit hotel) -new construction. HOTELR Hotel renovation. INDUST Industrial structure, new construction. 111 Industrial tenant improvement. MECH Mechanical permit, for mechanical work only. MISC Miscellaneous. Use only if proposed work doesn't fit another activity type. PATIO Patio and/or deck. PLUM Plumbing oermit, for plumbing work only. POOL Gunite pools and spas. RETAIN Retaining wall oermit. SIGN Sign construction/installation permit. SOLAR Solar energy system installation permit (specify structure type to be served). SPA Factory-made or Gunite. List 2 -Structure-Type (Use with Residential Permit Only) From the following list, determine the type of residential structure that best describes the structure on which you will be working. Please put the code of that structure-type in the appropriate blank at the top of the page on the front of this aoolication. Code Description SFA Single-family, attached. A one-family house attached to one or more other houses, with one or more common walls extending from foundation to roof at, or forming, a lot line. Has own plumbing and heating system (e.g.: townhouse, row house, half-plex). SFD Single-family detached: A one-family house with open area on all four sides. May have an attached or detached garage, or a business. May be a detached "granny flat·. May be a mobile home or trailer on an individual lot, but not in a mobile home park. MF2-4 Multi-family, 2 to 4 units. A residential structure on a single lot, contjining two, three, or four dwelling units. Units may share master heating, plumbing, or electrical service (e.g.: duplex triplex, quad-plex). MFS+ Multi-family, 5 or more units. Sarne as MF2-4, except the building has a t least five attached units on _the same lot. MOHO Mobile home, pre-fabricated house, or trailer installed (plumbed, wired) in a mobile home park (see distinction from single-family residence, above). I ., City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 10/31/2000 Permit# CB991270 Inspector Assignment: TP Title: LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES Description: 45,460 SF IMPROVEMENT W/2000 SF MECH. YARD Type:TI Job Address: Sub Type: COMM 2101 FARADAY AV Phone: 000000000000 lnspecfJJr:~ Suite: Lot 0 Location: APPLICANT SMITH CONSUL TING ARCHITECTS Owner: BLACKMORE FARADAY PARTNERS Remarks: Total Time: Requested By: N/A Entered By: ROBIN CD Description Act Comments 19 Final Structural L 29 Final Plumbing E 39 Final Electrical 49 Final Mechanical Associated PCRs PCR99092 ISSUED lnsgection Histo~ Date Description Act lnsp Comments 10/27/2000 89 Final Combo CA TP PER CONT. 10/17/2000 19 Final Structural NR TP PLN REV. NOT ON SITE 6/27/2000 89 Final Combo co TP 6/15/2000 89 Final Combo co TP SEE NOTICE ATTACHED 8/3/1999 84 Rough Combo AP DH 8/3/1999 89 Final Combo NR DH GAVE TEMP OCC PENDING COMPLETION OF ELEVATOR & EQUIPT TESTING 8/2/1999 84 Rough Combo NS DH 7/30/1999 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding AP DH T-GRID AT EMI RM 7/15/1999 84 Rough Combo AP DH T-GRID 7/12/1999 84 Rough Combo AP DH OVERHEAD-ROOMS LOC ON CARD 6/28/1999 84 Rough Combo AP DH CLEAN ROOM 6/22/1999 84 Rough Combo AP DH CORRIDOR T-GRID 6/21/1999 23 Gas/Test/Repairs AP DH BOILER RM 6/17/1999 17 Interior Lath/Drywall AP DH 6/15/1999 23 Gas/Test/Repairs AP DH A/CON ROOF 11 i 1 I I Inspection List Permit#: CB991270 Type: Tl COMM LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES Date Inspection Item Inspector Act Comments 8/3/99 84 Rough Combo DH AP 8/3/99 89 Final Combo DH NR GAVE TEMP OCC PENDING COMPLETIO 8/2/99 84 Rough Combo DH NS 7/30/99 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin DH AP T-GRID AT EMI RM 7/15/99 84 Rough Combo DH AP T-GRID 7/12/99 84 Rough Combo DH AP OVERHEAD-ROOMS LOC ON CARD 6/28/99 84 Rough Combo DH AP CLEAN ROOM 6/22/99 84 Rough Combo DH AP CORRIDOR T-GRID 6/21/99 23 Gas/Test/Repairs DH AP BOILER RM 6/17/99 17 Interior Lath/Drywall DH AP BOILER RM 6/15/99 23 Gas/Test/Repairs DH AP A/CON ROOF 6/14/99 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall DH PA LOCATION ON PLANS 6/14/99 23 Gas/Test/Repairs DH co TEST FAILED RETEST 6/11/99 17 Interior Lath/Drywall DH PA LOCATION ON CARD/PLANS 6/9/99 17 Interior Lath/Drywall DH AP LOCATION ON PLANS 6/7/99 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall DH AP MARKED ON PLANS 6/4/99 17 Interior Lath/Drywall DH PA MARKED ON PLANS 6/3/99 17 Interior Lath/Drywall DH PA LOCATION ON CARD 6/2/99 13 Shear Panels/HD's DH AP CLEAN ROOM 6/2/99 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin DH WC 6/2/99 17 Interior Lath/Drywall DH PA LOCATION ON CARD 6/1/99 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin DH AP WALLS 6/1/99 17 Interior Lath/Drywall DH WC 6/1/99 21 Underground/Under Floor DH AP 6/1/99 34 Rough Electric DH AP WALLS Tuesday, September 21, 1999 Page 1 of 1 ~ CltvofCarlsbad 113 Final Building lnspecllon .. Dept: Building Engineering Planning CMWD St Lite-..Eir..e> Plan Check #: Date: 8/3/99 Permit#: CB991270 Permit Type: Tl Project Name: LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES Sub Type: COMM 45,460 SF IMPROVEMENT W/2000 SF MECH. YARD Address: 2101 FARADAY AV Lot: 0 Contact Person: NA Phone: 7606029743 Sewer Dist: CA Water Dist: CA .......................................................................................................................................................... Inspected a~L, Date d./R I {JO )(' Disapproved: __ By: Inspected: Approved: Inspected Date By: Inspected: Approved: Disapproved: __ Inspected Date By: Inspected: Approved: Disapproved: __ .......................................................................................................................................................... , Comments: ------------------------------ SmithConsu tingArchitects TRANSMITTAL To: Dave Company: Lakewood Construction 2101 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92006 ATTACHED: Date Description Date: 1/11/00 Project No: 99247.T ----------- Project: Lucent-Toilet Rm. Addition No. Copies 3 10/11/00 FIELD BULLETIN #1-PARTITION DETAIL TRANSMITTED VIA: D FAX (Sheet 1 of ) Fax No. D Mail -- D Messenger D Overnight Delivery 181 Other HAND DELIVERED REMARKS: DISTRIBUTION: SCA File John McElroy Lucent Technologies 12220 El Camino Real Suite 200 San Diego, CA 92130 619.793-4777 619.793.4787 Fax BY: ACTION D For your approval D For your review and comment 181 As requested D For your use / files D Reviewed as noted D No exceptions taken D Revise / Resubmit With Encl. W/O Encl. D 181 D 181 D D D D Christopher J. Slahta, job captain +12'-0' ~ T.O.W. -'1'~f-·_9_'·_0_· __ ; f ·~i r·····~ .. ······· : ·. \:.·.:·.::·:·--··· ... ,,,.--------5/8' TYPE 'X' GYP BD. PAINTED. --------3/4' CDX FL YWOOD • PAINTED . .r--------6'x20 GA. CEILING JOIST fll 24' o/c PARTITION • 3-5/6'x20 GA. fil 24' olc wl R-11 BATT INSUL. .r-------------BOT. TRACK ANCI-IORED TO SLAB w/ 'RAMSET' POWDER DRIVEN FINS fil 32' 0.C.' 6' FROM ENDS 2-FINS FER TRACK MIN. (ICBO %39) ----------------4 CONT. BEADS OF SEALANT X274D11 PARTITION AT TOILET RM. FIELD BULLETIN -PARTITION DETAIL FB-011100.dwg LUCENT TOIL. RM. ADDITION CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA lbt!W:@llillt 'ii'®(slii!iiiJ@ll@x,gj!@@ Ml!Jtil:llll~ 0 1-1/2' = 1'-0' 12220 8 Camm Roal Sulo200 5'n ll"6',, 0. 92130 (619) 7V3-'il77 (619) m-m7 m FD No._ 9£!2..!. __ _ SHT: 01 OF l 01.11.00 Date Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. Established 1946 FINAL REPORT FOR SPECIAL INSPECTION AND MATERIAL TESTING DA TE; June 28, 1999 .(JI?, TO: City of Carlsbad ' 1.-f: (/;:) · !$~ Job No. 99-190 Building Department -..:; /> fi "l :=.. 92009 S11, .f tJ( :J ;· <I/!:,~~-J · 'IAJfJrr, l.999 U SUBJECT: SATISFACTORY COMPLETION OF WORK REQUJRING SPECIA't~~~}ON AND ATERIAL TESTING PERMITNO.: CB991519/CB991270 PROJECT ADDRESS: Lucent Technofogy 2101 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, California Go StfrG l declare under penalty of perjury tlmt. to the best of my knowledge, the work requiring special inspection, material sampling and testing. including the off-site fabrication of building components for t11e stmcture/s constructed under the subject permits is in confonnance ,vit11 the approved plans, the inspection nnd obser\'atic,n program and other constmction documents, and the applicable workmanship prmisions of the Unifonn Building Code. Executed on this 28th day of June. 1999. The work wltich we prmided Special Inspection consisted of: Reinforced Concrete. Dowel/Bolt Anchorage, Structural Steel including Field Welding. A. If the inspection services were provided by an approved material testing laboratory or special inspection agency: TESTING LABORATORY OR SPECIAL INSPECTION AGENCY: Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. ADDRESS: 7895 Co11voy Court, Suite 18, San Diego, CA 92111 RESPONSIBLE MANAGING ENGINEER OF THE TESTING LABORATORY OR SPECIAL INSPECTION AGENCY: NAME (PRINT OR TYPE) R. Douglas Provins_~__,_._-~16~~_,,/~t/f?~e--'-"-_ .. ___ ~--- State of California Rcgislration Number: C56018 , Expiration Date: 12/31/00 B. If the inspection services were provided ''ly an independent cettificd special inspector: SPECIAL INSPECTOR'S NAME (PRlNTOR TYPE): REGISTRATION NUMBER: EXPIRATION DA TE: SIGNATURE: Testing Engineers -San Diego. Inc .. H95 Convoy Court. Suite 18 San Diego, CA. 92111 I 6 l 91715-5800 Fax [6l91715-5810 r • o1 osvovaa dss=vo oo sa unc ,_ . .. . ,. \,, ~ i HI . > TESTING ENGINEERS SAN DIEGO PROJECT LUCENT TECHNOLOGY PROJECT NO • ..;.,;..;..___,;_.;;'---'--'---'-----------------"#-r--...,.__,.._,..._.. __ PROJECT ADDRESS 2101 FARADAY AVENUE CONTRACTOR SWINERTO\I & WALBERG CO. ARCHITECT/ ENGINEER MEISSNER & WERST/ PRIME STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS BLDG. PERMIT NO. CB991519 ___ PLAN FILE NO. ___ N_/A ____ _.,._ __ _ SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF 1K] CONCRETE [] MORTAR D GROUT D HS GROUT D PRISMsD OTHER PLACEMENT DATE 6/14/9!1 DATE RECEIVED IN LAB 6/15/99 SUPPLIER NELSON SLOAN/HANSON --------''-'-------MIX DESIGN PSI 3000 MIX NUMBER 3033001) MIX DESCRIPTION 1" ROCK/Pl. TYPE OF CEMENT l, 11 ---------------TICKET NO. 793578 ADMIXTURE WRDA €,4 SLUMP (IN.) 51/2" MIXING TIME (MlN} UNDER 90 ----------AIR CONTENT(%) NIA CONC. TEMP.( °F) N/A ----------AIR TEMP.(°F) 72 DES I G N STRENGTH (f 1 0) PSI 3000 @ 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY G.BAEZ LOCATION OF PLACEMENT HIGH MECHANICAL ENCLOSURE CURB AN..,..D_S_LA_B_O_N_G_RA_D_E ______ _ LA BORA TORY DATA AGE DIMENSIONS TEST AREA MAXIMUM LOAD COMPRESSIVE (DAYS) LAB NO. DATE TESTED (inches) (sq. inches) {lbs) STRENGTH (psi) 7 22045 6/5/99 6X12 28.27 635,000 2250 28 22046 6/26/99 6X12 28.27 92,500 3270 28 22047 6/26/99 6X12 28.27 88,000 3110 56 22048 7/24/99 DISC , ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING PERFORME() IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM TEST ME:THOOS. ·ACTUAL MEASURED AREA. REMARKS: TWO 28 DAYS COMPLY WITH PROJECT SPEClF!CATIONS. CHECKED BY: DATE: ------ REVIEWED BY: R. DOUGLAS PROVINS, RCE 56018 ~p DATE: 0 I u, tl?iG\ . OSvOvaB dss=vo oo sa unr ~~~ ' .. Testing Engineers .. San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT . I Page_1_of_ Project Name Lur:«11+ kchnobJ;r .. Teoaaaf Io,;p,overnenT TESD ~roject # _9.;...,_?_-..c...L .... 1-=t:J"------- Address 2/1)/ 6,,-.4 day All'e ear1.s.6ac11 C,1, hi,~ General/ Subcontractor ..h«,.,,,;echn, J ht 1/:,edJ .,/ . J 1 Building Permit# C ,B 791:2. Gtl DSA # ..... NU<.L,/Jqu.. _____________ _ Plan File# ,N/,q OSHPD #_NLJ..,L/J_n;r._ ___________ _ Government Contract #_-..ic.,Jy.,_._/i.....,1;, .. 1 _______ Other --'-'-1.4CJ..---------------- INSPECTION __ concrete __ Prestress Cone __ Masonry _iL_s1ructS1eel he.Id we.1J1j __ Fireproofing __ Pile Driving __ Non-Destructive __ Batch Plant __ SQ•ls Technician __ Mechanical __ Electrical __ Bolt Pull-Out __ .Aooling __ Waterprooling __ OSA --OSHPD __ Specialty MAT'L SAMPLING _ Soil __ Basa __ Sutorade __ Asphalt Concrete __ Corcrete Cylinders __ Core Flex Beams __ Reh1t. Steel __ Tenjon (PT Strands) __ Mortar Samples __ Grout Samples _ MaHonry Prisms __ Mauonry Block __ Ste?I __ H.S.Bolls __ FirEproofmg __ Roc,llng __ Other ___ _ QTY MATERIAL DESCRJPTION J::J/11_ Cone· Mix #/psi Cone: Mix #/psi---- Cone: Mix #/psi ___ _ Rini: Rebar ____ _ Aini: W.W.F. ____ _ Rini: Tendons ___ _ Grout: Mix #/psi ___ _ Mortar: Type1psi ___ _ Units: Block ____ _ __ Units: Block ____ _ A.51!:1._sieel A.;Soo6r B JJ.iA__H,S. Bolls ____ _ ~Metal Decking ___ _ ~lectrodes FE7t k I [ !!.JL..Fireproofing ___ _ ..llft::_other _____ _ INSPECTION CHECKLIST -1.J.K_pians _____ _ .....aJ;_specilications ___ _ ~Sizes _____ _ ...fiJA..-s1ump ------ .li/.A_Air Content ____ _ ..fl/;::_. Temperalure ____ _ liLA._Unit Weight ____ _ ...piA.consolidation ___ _ ~Electrode Storage __ _ fl/A Torque Applied ___ _ ~ Load (Pounds) ___ _ ..1lfA Thickness---,.-,.-~~ _a_l;,_ • ~J -Df;.._ _CQrrectiv1!actionrequired __ __ CorracIions completed __ ~ Remarks Caof/nvar>S '{j_'soa I 'tnsoec.f/on De.r£o,,.rned On tle:./Js C.anecft~q hcr,~on+d r 1 ~ ..1 ivbc S'.fe.e./ ,»iemb~cf ,1--,., Co.kmn :f:vbeuSfcef m t1ni><--cS af lujle.r of .f,.,,..ro 'f<.. 131>£> I L/-D Field Representative# _______________ _ CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: To the best of my knowledge, all of the reported work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. INSPECTOR'S NAME Gu ,1/e.rmo_ . li11 e.7-, tPr!nl Clearly) CERT. NO. 5/./3 C;.J.~. of ktr /);(JO INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE _jJb.t='-~=•.i..' ~tJo=IJ,=4?-------- i . DATE ,hu~e 14 i&,o/'j Form#003 OSPOvaB doo=so oo sa unr .. ffi - Testiing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page_1_of __ _ Project Name L vcen-f Tec/zao/D& V .. hnnp,af ~rovem,e_" + TESD Project# ....r..9 ..... 9_-,_//-<-J~"'------- Address 'j,lal Ea,-,, J-r y Av, ' · C cL.f"kdl C./4.br-n;, 0 ~ / ,»eo-r::i ,[lee I 15:-r cb r .s -. General/ Subcontractor ,¼ltbertr:>n /,k/4,/f>ry Building Permit # .... C ..... B--/ ...... 'l ..... L~.:J .......... 7 ..... 1, _________ DSA #__.:_;~-------------- Plan File# ..,...L../v.,,_._,/s_~ ____________ OSHPD #~N:..:...;-,t,..e ____________ _ Government Contract #--,.fY.-../2 .... tJ. _________ Other N,/A INSPECTION MAT'L SAMPLING QTY __ Concrete --1if!!_soil __ ?restress Cone Base _ Masonry , Sutgrade -4L--Struct Steel f,e/J Af:./J,llj' As,halt Concrete __ Fireproofing Co1Jcrete Cyfinders _ Pile Driving Coric Flex Baams __ Non-Deslruclive Rei1I. Steel __ Batch Plant Tendon (PT Strands) _ Soils Technician Mo:lar Samples __ Mechanical Grcut Samples __ e:tectrical Ma·;onry Prisms __ Bolt Pull-Out Ma·;onry Block __ Roofing Steel __ Waterprooling H.5. Bolls __ DSA Fi11•proollng __ OSHPD AO<lfing --Specially Ot~er __ _ MATERIAL DESCRIPTION ..N/A_conc: Mix JI/psi Cone: Mix tt/psl ___ _ Cone: Mix ~/psi ___ _ Rini; Rebat ____ _ Rini: W.W.F, ____ _ Ainf: Tendons ___ _ Grout: Mix #/psi ___ _ Mortar: Type/psi ___ _ Units: Block ____ _ __ Units: Block ____ _ A ffM Steel /j'S_OO Ge B __ H.S. Bolts ____ _ Metal Decking ___ _ (CAWetectrodes £111:' I { __ Fireproofing ____ _ __ Other _____ _ INSPECTION CHECKLIST ~Plans _____ _ ..1)}!;._specilications _. ___ _ .AL sizes _____ _ __ Stump _____ _ __ Air Content ____ _ .J2l5,.__ Temperature ___ _ __ Unit Weight ____ _ __consolidation ___ _ l:2J;:.__Electrode Storage __ _ __ Torque Applied ___ _ __ Load (Pounds) ___ _ Thickness ,........,---e--,--,-- ..o.}f_ Cerf;ft;d bf JJ~rs f4;:.._ fi+vp __ Cc,,ecWeactQn r,iqui,ea _ __ Ccrreetlons completed __ I../ 'R. f3.l>b1 Llo Field Representative # ________________ _ CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: To the ·:,est of my knowledge, all of the reported work, unless othef\Nise staled, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. tNSPECTOR'S NAME Gu,.lle cmo Ba~:i. tnnt Clearly) CERT. NO. 3 iJJ C ti~ 1 kl b ]),fl°=:. INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE Jjr:Jkuv0 ~~ .i. DATE bbe 2.';2/ )C/11 Form#ao3·- s·d osvov2a doo=so oo sa unr Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page _j__ of_ Project Name Lucer:d: Tt.c b via los TESD ffoject # _'1_._9_._-...,_) 4-'-""D,____ ___ _ Address ~~ ,X.:/7!;. /Joe General I Subcontractor Swrner:fa;a iwa.f be..r_y Buildfng Permit #..,.C...., ...... 13!,,,<J-, :)...._:f...,_._/'2=-.,;-7..,, .. "--______ DSA #_-_______________ _ Plan File# _________________ OSHPD # ________________ _ Government Contract # _____________ Other_-_________________ _ INSPECTION MAT'L SAMPLING QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION INSPECTION CHECKLIST L_ Concrete __ soi --~one: Mix #/psi 3e>l!E_ ___fJ_5_ Plans 8:s!~ltWed ; __r,;;jr;;_ Specifications Rev,ewe/ __ Prestress Cone __ eaie --__ Cone: Mix #/psi __ Masonry __ sut,grade --__ Cone: Mix #/psi -12.k..s,-.es 6kr:.!:.6~d. _struct Steel __ As~halt Concrete --<f\-~nf: Rebar br,.J1, lp ~ Stump __ Fireproofing .!.$e±. Concrete Cylinders -*-__ R.!nt: W.W.F. _·_Air Content __ Pile DriVing _cor,c Flex eeams --__ Rini: Tendons ~ Temperature __ Non-Destruclive _Reiif. Steel --__ Grout: Mix #/psi __ Unit Weight __ Batch Plant __ Tendon (PT Sttands) --__ Monar: Type/psi -12.15:.... Consolidation 1/1 b..cdnt: __ Soils Technician __ M011ar samples --__ Units: Block __ E:ectrode Storage __ Mechanical __ Grcut Samples --__ Units: Block __ Torque Applied __ Electrical __ Manonry Prisms --__ Sleet __ Load (Pounds) __ Bolt Pull•Oul __ Ma:,oory Block --__ H.S.6ol1S __ Ttuckness __ Roofing __ Ste?! --__ Mela! Decking --__ Waterproofing __ H,S.Bolls --__ Electrodes --__ DSA _ Fir,proofing --__ Fireproofing· -- --OSHPO __ Roc,fing --___ Other __ CC<reetiveactionreqvired ___ --Specialty __ Other --__ Corrections completed __ Field Representative # _______________ _ CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: To the best of my knowledge, all of the reported work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the approved plans a·nd specifications a.nj the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. \ INSPECTOR'S NAME G1JJ !je,n,10 Bae.z. (Pnnt Clearly) CERT. NO. 343 Cit'{ of: So.n D,~n INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE _._Jj'-d-"lM"""·J.....,'.L"""""',"'""2 _,~~e&,.,.~d..-------DATE .JvY\€ \+t )'fl"} . Form•003 OSvOt>i:?B dao=so oo sa un.r Test'ing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 1 a· San Diego, CA 9211i INSPECTION REPORT Page 1 of -- Project Name Lucen+ hc.hoalo3 TESD Project# _:f...,___.:f_-_..f_...'1.,,,0'------- Address ~~\~a'ttc:. General/ Subcontractor Su.Ji ner:t:rn1. / Wa.l buy Building Permit# C, P, qq 12 'J..O S: ; -e..rra 5' ..Jee. I DSA# __.,. N/A- Plan File# _________________ OSHPD # ,,_ N /p.. - GovernmentContract# ______ _.,{'J-'-'/A'--..-_____ Other -t,J)A - INSPECTION MAT'L SAMPLING QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION __ Concrete l:l./A_ Soil J:!./.t_ Cone: Mix #/psi __ Prestress Cone Basa Cone: Mix #/psi ___ _ _Masonry • Sub~rade _\L_Struct Steel P,eJd We.1J.,~1 Asp ialt Concrete Cone: Mi)( #/psi ___ _ Rini: Rebar ____ _ __ Fireproof,ng Concrete Cylinders Rini: W.W.f:, ____ _ __ Pila Driving Cone Flex Beams Rm!; Tendons ___ _ _ Non-Destructive Rein!. Steel Grout: Mix ~!psi ___ _ __ Batch Plant TeMon (PT Strands) Mortar: Type/psi ___ _ __ Soils Technician Mor .ar Samples Unit$: Block ____ _ __ Mechanical Gro Jt Samples Units: Block---~- Eleclrical Maeonry Prisms ~S:eel A3ly ASJ;>GI Gr. 1?.. __ Boll Pull•Out Ma~ on,y Block __ H.S. Bolls ____ _ __ Roofing S1e11l __ Metal Decking ___ _ __ Waterproofing H.S Bolls ~Eiectrooes I;: 7 IT-11 __ DSA Fire ,roofing __ Fireproofing ____ _ --OSHPD Rocfing __ Other ______ _ --Specialty __ 01Mr INSPECTION CHECKLIST ....o.);;_P1ans fev,;wed J2.l:__ Specif;:tions ~ --.a/s:_Sizes Cbr.r f:td __ Slump _____ _ __ Air Conlent ____ _ --OJ;_ Temperature ____ _ __ Unit Weight ____ _ __ Consolidation ___ _ ~ Electrode Storage __ _ __Torque Applied ___ _ __ Load (Pounds) ___ _ __ Thickness ____ _ :1 %::!·r;e.1 Ar.rded __ Corieciive action required __ _ __ correcilons compte1ad __ Remarks Pe-cfol"med Vi'socd -,aspe.cb'ob on fa12p t;,.ad [,'lie+ wdcl.5 Connec.+inJ 45< [1x,:4' ·fobf Ste.-el ho;1'20{\¼I f'c.._..,·l°J wmbec:S" +a /::J.1'x 12'x YL( ttJ.he 9eel (blumoS ct± 'R, Bb-0 t lAA..i Field Representative# _________________ _ CERTIFICATION OF COMPLlANCE: To the test of my knowledge, an of the reported work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. INSPECTOR'S NAME Gu; lle.rroo Btae.Z • (Prtot Clearty) INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE ~ti=-llj,.,...' ..,_,,L,IGL.;-.l .. -f>'A"""~""""""'!A. ,---------d a·d ostovaa CERT. No.313 Ci-ht C>t 5.'r,b J),5'o DATE 3:)ne. I>; l'lq9 Formt003 dao:so oo sa un.r f ' • .. .. -~ .. ... Gil Test'ing Engineers -San Di~go, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page_1_of_ Project Name Luc.g,of /ec..baofuJy Address 'll c, 1 Ea re.; d a. y Ave CAl:ls ba.d , Cc,, }, {ora1a TESD ~r()ject # ~:Z~'1~--'-j-O~----- J General/ Subcontractor ~&? ~ ner:fot::t ,11,/4, tbe..r!f Building Permit# C 8 Cf3//J...1t DSA #_,_N.!...:/~------------ Plan File# ""'NIA -OSHPD #_./1/:....Y...<../""'A~----------- Government Contract #_:;.,_N...._._,(A'""_-__ -_______ Other /IIA INSPECTION MAT'L SAMPLING Concre~ _/,J./p_son __ Prestress Cone Bas~ Masonry Sub~rade .::Z Struct Steel F, e.. / J. hfe Jd1j Asp ,alt Concrete _ Fireproofing Concrete Cylinders _ Pile Driving Cone Flex Beams __ Non-Destructive Rei11f. Steel __ Batch Plant Tendon (PT Strands) __ Soils Technician Mor:ar Samples __ Mechanical Gro ii Samples __ Elecirical Masonry Prisms __ Bolt Pull-Out MaE onry Block __ Roofing Steul __ Walerproollng H.S Bolts _OSA Fire )roofing --OSHPO Aocfing __ specialty Oth,;r QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION --1/fA_conc: Mix #/psi Cone: Mix #/psi ___ _ Cone: Mix Hlpsl ___ _ Aini: Rebar ____ _ Rinf:W.W.F. ___ _ Rini: Tendons ___ _ C:irout: Mix #.!psi ___ _ Mortar: Type/psi ___ _ Units: SlOCk ____ _ Units: Block ____ _ ,Um_Steel A.£')p Gr:, .i ..&/J__H.S. ~s ____ _ Q/e,.,_ M~~27~ing ~Electrodes /& 71 u,/1 _Fireproofing ____ _ __ Other _____ _ INSPECTION CHECKLIST _t:d:_p1ans J?,wwecl AL Specifications kewt:J -1,lH;L.Sizes _____ _ ~Slump _____ _ --11.f/i..Air Content ____ _ ..t:;,i;:_ Temperature ___ _ ..,&:/A:..Unit Weight ____ _ ...t,!_{e__consollda1ion ___ _ &ZK.___ Electrode Storage /J, a' Q./§n tt.LfJ__ Torque Applied ___ _ ..tJfL.Load (Pounds) ___ _ ...t::!./lJ_ Thickness -,,----- al:.__ &..c/;{}e J A,t/JecS .u;;,__ ....._,5..,_,_~"'+P __ _ ___ Co<Tective action required __ __ Corrections completed __ Remarks Perfot:tbed Coo+·,n..11cd; ~",sva I l~Soec.f/ph otJ -Cf.oT'J cabJ We.¼ on f d: a:x 1/:/ I/ fe.be S'fr:el bor-',:z.o;,;+a I ~ a, ,",,,J /'nen,,br..rS do /2 ;k 12;k //4 11 -/Yb<. Cieel G,luh)a S: Ob lo kl.c and bi' 6 01edttn1ca. f eb?(6uces /oce -1,J «i ea.Si £;'de al huJ//13 , hf,. /Jl't,_,j i s / o pr-129 i--e§ . A /§_i,. 1'0 s D e,e,~ed £,· Ile J: weld > Ab e/e ve. -1-o e f..d2c <;./a.( J. ui d<-ra ~ Lr S::frLJC.d:tztzd. af.f:qcbrnends +o ¢,c,stin; guzke; Loe.a -led a_-1: f't"n:sAed_ [/oo,,,.-fc In CZ.Zan ;,...e e/ev:aw'C gr-,'d/ine5 t;/e.1 . V£ IJ..s b,ve /2e.eo Compfeied as ,Pee )rn;Cn;rq/ 6poctc Clot,:; £,cc.-fi Oh Jc:&vh~J ,fJcef Field Representative # __ R __ P:i_f>-p,t_.U,u __ ___,. ______ _ CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: To the test of my knowledge, all of the reported work, unless otherwise stated, is in qonformance with the approved plans a~d specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. INSPECTOR'S NAME Go,.lle.r-ma (Print Clearly) \ ..L ' CERT. NO. :N3 Ct+~ QLSA h D ':<JP INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE Jjj},_.:J /3 '=') DATEJ.uof. L~_rnt Foim•003 osvovaa dgo:so oo sa unr Testing Engineers ft San Diego, ,Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA92111 INSPECTION REPORT • ,1,w•--...... 7 Page_1_of_ Project Name LocenI Tecb.-\0/09 TESD Project # _<:}...,_:}.._-_._{ q""'O _____ _ AddrOSs ~~ l~J :i~ {;;:, General I Subcontractor ,'i._H'oecdnn I~ 1'2< rJ Building Permit #_.C_, ..... B~i?'-9....,/w..2 .... ~:,;;.,""-------DSA # --""'-'-"''---------------- Plan Fite# -~N>L,t..L.cA'-----·--------OSHPD #...,_,,=..._------------,--- Government Contract #.......,_rA[,_)'-'A,._,_ _________ Other --'"""""/......_ ______________ _ INSPECTION _COl'lcrete __ Prestress Cone __ Masonry __Ls1ruc1 Steel hel::J /Jt..fd1',,_y __ Fireproofing __ Pne Driving __ Non,Destructive __ Balch Plant _ Soils Technician __ Mechanical __ Electrical __ Solt Pull-Out _ Roofing __ Waterproofing __ DSA --OSHPO --Specially MAT'L SAMPLING J)!/_Ason Base Sutgrade As~haU Concrete Cor crate Cyhnaers Cor c Flex Beams Rei 1f. Steel Ten:Jon (PT Strands) Mo1tar Samples Grout Samples Ma:,onry Prisms Ma:ionry Block Steil H.S. Bolls Fl<~ proofing Roc,ting Other ___ _ QTY MATERIAL DESCRlPTlON ..1f1./J_ Cone: Mix #/psi Cone: Mix #/psi ___ _ Cone: Mix #/psi ___ _ Rini: Rebar ____ _ Flin!: W.W.F. ____ _ Rini: Tenoons ___ _ Grout: Mix #/psi ___ _ Mortar: Type/psi ___ _ Units: Block ____ _ __ Units: Stock ____ _ A.s:::te1s1ee1 A S-ol> Ge 3 __ H.S, Bolls ____ _ __ Metal Decking ___ _ ~lectrodes E 211?-I I __ Fireprooling ____ _ __ Olher _____ _ INSPECTION CHECKLIST ..a.,e_ Plans IR,e 'I te w,J. ...o1::_ Speci~cations /?;i:v1('1vel, ...htlll..Sizes _____ _ ±Slump _____ _ /\ir Content ____ _ ..o.JC__ Temperature ____ _ l::Jia._ untt Weight ____ _ -1:i{,g_ Consolidation ___ _ .QJ:__ Electrode Storage __ _ ~ Torque Applied ___ _ ~Load (Pounds) ___ _ .)[/p_ Thickness ----,-......,..- ..Q.J::.._ C'ecJ ,.C, e rl flt:-lle.-cr; -0./5--"~'-1--d:.....,.,__,vJl""o---- __ Cortee!ive action required __ __ Corrections completed _ Remarks Pechrme.J V,.suel t~Sf.e.cvon Oh [:-1-vp «od Weld£ on 1:'t/2::r¼'' her/2.<:>l?fA I +~be £he I !}4,-,,,'n'j' !(Jf'mbe,-J: ir;; /2 ';'( .t2''x '/,t/' fvl< Sir-e L Colo mos of luj !i /Jro?r:L-e ,J,,t{3,')..1~e,"/21.LJ lnechkaicr.tl t;,nc/owce /oc5-/ed al -e4isJ. 4µ./-s;ide par+;or. cf t,v~I.J,;,j, Field Representative # __ 'K_, _f>_M,f,_U,..> __________ _ CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: To the best of my knowledge, all of the reported work. unless otherwfse stated. Is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. INSPECTOR'S NAME. Gut'l[enna ,f1rez ' .-(Pr;n1 Ctearty) INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE .!1w.·J/4&.a-0 ~ 01·d 06-v0v~B CERT. NO. 113 c:-1y o+l;~ .D,eyl) DATE-hbe I 'lj /2q1 dt,o:so oo s~ unr > • • •••• - Testing Engineers ~ San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 1 s· San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT ·7 Page_1_of_ Project Na~e L uce.n± le.c ?aaio~y TESD Project# _1J.-+'}'._-..,_I..L9-=D::;.._ __ -__ Address:2/o I & ec,_c/a yt A v< Ca r:ls:b~ d Ca CG. ..... 1 General / Subcontractor S'w ia e,.. it,;, .I k:JfA 11,,:..J Building Permit# C, /3 9:'1 ll2l ~a DSA #--'~-------------- Plan File # {V/43-OSHPD #...,.N'-!...J../,,_,/':J"--------------- Government Contract #--"-N.!.L.</;ar= ___ . ________ Other -~~r_. ______________ _ INSPECTION MAT'L SAMPLING __ Concrete -1J.lE...soil __ Pres1ress Cone Base __ Masonry • /cli, -_ sutorade .....L_siructSleel F,e/J Wt f Asphalt Concrete __ Fi1apr001ing Corcrele Cylinders __ Pila Driving Cor c Flex Beams __ Non-Destructive Rei,11. Steel __ Balch Plant Tenjon (PT Strands) __ Soils Technician Mo,1ar Ssmplas __ Mechanical Grout Samples __ Eleclrical Ma:,onry Prisms __ eon Pull-Out Ma,,onry Block __ Rogfing Ste-!1 __ Waterproofing H.S. Bolls __ DSA Fireproofing --OSHPD Ro(-ting ----Specially __ O!her QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION ~Cone: Mix #/psi Cone: Mix ~/psi ___ _ Cone: M1~ utpsi ___ _ Rini. Rebar ____ _ Rini: W.W.F, ____ _ Rinf: Tendons ___ _ Grout: Mix nipsi ___ _ Mortar: Type/psi ___ _ Units: B1ock ____ _ __ Units. Block ____ _ ~Steel /25:ooGc, @: 1:/,LLH.S. Bolls ____ _ 11/.A..._Metal Decking ___ _ ~1ec1,octes e 711~ I I __ Fireproofing ____ _ __ Other _____ _ INSPECTION CHECKLIST .-OJ::..._pfans _____ _ ...t).15:_.Specifications ___ _ ..tzls__sizes _____ _ ~Slump _____ _ * Air Content Temperalure ____ _ Unit Weight ____ _ __ Consolidation ___ _ a/5:._Electrode Storage __ _ jl/A Torque Applied ___ _ ..!!ZcL_Loao (Pounds) ___ _ .f!ifl... Thickness ____ _ -2/£.. Cecf,£,dk.leJJ«>: _QK_ Etllf' __ Correctil'llaclionrequired __ __ Corrections completed __ l> Field Representative #_...,_12o_~1PJ_f_: ft_t_r_J._~_ll_i_<l ______ _ CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: To the best of my knowledge, all of the reported work, unless othezwise staled, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the. workmanship provisions of the applicable code. INSPECTOR'S NAME Gwiter.toa i1a £'2... '(P11m CleartyJ INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE...,.LJ.....,41=~~-ri.'-_,_k__.~-------- n ·d ostotaa CERT. NO. i~J Cdy of [Z>, DATE~bne J<J. L? Cf '1 J Formu003 dso:so oo sa unr Testi=ng Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page_1_of _J_ Project Name L '-< C ~~! --;-;;:C k n.o/o?s l; S. Address ¢ IC J f::(,h"-o,c(c.<,.• TESD Project# q 9-/ q () General I Subcontractor S$ l 1 i. t'\C" d ..... C""""H'""''\..___4-___ ---"'l .... J ... o. ____ ...;.\ =~'-"l!.""'J,,_':..::C:::::.----------------- Buitding Permit# <' B qq iJ. 7C) DSA#~_) ________________ _ Plan File# ________________ OSHPD # _________________ _ Government Contract # _____________ Other----.----------------- INSPECTION MAT'L SAMPLING QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION INSPECTION CHECKLIST ~crate !Zc:.-b\ . ..-__ soil --~-Cone: Mix #/psi --__ Plans __ Presiress Cone __ eas• --__ cone: Mix #/psi __ Specifications __ Masonry __ $ubgrade --__ cone: Mix #/psi __ Sizes _Struct Steel __ Asp,all Concre1e --__ Rini: Rebar l\(p l s;-__ $lump __ fireproo11ng __ Corcrele Cylinders --__ Rini: W.W.F. __ Air Content __ Pile Driving __ Core FleK Beams --__ Rinf: Tendons __ Temperalure __ Non-Des1ruclive __ Rei11f. Steel --__ Grout Mix #/psi __ Unit Weight __ Batch Plant __ Ten 10n (PT Strands) -__ Mortar: Typelpsl __ Consolidation __ Soils Technician _ Moriar Samples --__ Units: Block __ Electrode Storage __ Mectianical __ Gr0JI Samples --__ Units: Block __ Torque Applied __ Electrical __ Maionry Prisms --__ Steel __ Load (Pounds) __ Boll Pull-Ou! __ Mai onry Block -__ H.S.Bolts __ Thickness __ Roofing __ Stenl --__ Metal Decking -- __ waterproofing __ H.S Bolls --__ EIectroaes --__ DSA ____ Fireproofing -__ Fireproofing -- --OSHPO __ Reefing --__ Other __ Cotree1Iveactionrequired _. __ --Specialty __ Oth,r --__ ConecIlons compleled __ Remarks ·-,n>pn· +eel :fh (;'C-'j'l.f ~~c-l. t::t.1 vt Lh;-:.,<: i.:.-1 1Jc.J 1t:P,,k I \a\,v~~ £er {4, rf\((' ho.'.\n:c,l '\lt;d{\ <;k. .. f, o-,.-LA !?.c.Jiv$--> px~:· ck!,:.:( c-;_f.g(,J ~.::>£°":: c-(- ·'D 13>}.b,( LlD 5· t f ·9 ct Field Representative#_,:::_ .• _____________ _ CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: To the best of my knowledge, all of the reported work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications an:I the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. S.; i::U 6 CERT. NO.--=--_._-'--',.._ ____ _ DATE ~--~ 8 -({1<-; Formn003 OSt-OvZB dso:so oo sa unr ' , Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page ....L of _J_ Project Name Lu.c..c,'\ k ""le.cJ,q1,o \05) e). Address £I() \ ·& J' CA. d.c y TESD Project# 9 <f--./ y B ~ . General/ Subcontractor <; td; '" e..;c io ":\ ~ t!Jc., { beJ'c.1 ..) Building Permit# C (3. qq -i.l 7 0 DSA # ________________ _ Plan File# ________________ OSHPD # ________________ _ Government Contract# Other __________________ _ INSPECTION MAT'L SAMPLING QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION INSPECTION CHECKLIST __ Concrete __ Soi --__ cone: Mix Mpsi --__ Plans __ Prestress Cone __ ea!i8 --__ Cone: Mi• #/psi __ Specifications __ Masoniy __ Suhgrade --a Cone: Mix #/psi __ Si2es __ Struct Steel __ Asphalt Concrete --Rini: Rebar A(,e I s;--__ Slump __ Fireprooling __ co11cre1e Cylinders -_Aini: W.W.F. __ Air Content _Pile Driving __ Cone Flex Beams --_ Rint: Tendons __ Temperalure __ Non-Destructive __ Re nf. Steel --__ Grout: Mix n/psi _Unit Weight __ Batch Plant __ Ter don (PT Strands} --__ Mortar: Type/psi __ Consolidation __ Soils Tecnnician __ Mor!ar Samples --__ Units: Block __ Electrode Storage __ Mechanical _ Grout Samples --__ Units: Block __ Torque Applied __ Electrical __ Masonry Pnsms --_steel __ Load [Pounds) __ Bolt Pvll-Out __ Masoniy Block --_H.S.Bolls __ Thickness _Roofing __ steel --__ Metal Decking -- __ Waterprooling __ H.:l.Bolts --__ Electrodes -- _DSA __ Fir,iprooling --__ Fireproofing -- -OSHPO __ Ro,fing --__ Other __ Ccirec1ive acbonrequired ___ -~Y~p0~i It,· ., l:-,1':. __ Other --__ Corrections c:omplele:d ___ Remarks 7o:-r-x<"1'::d -.\ le c fS7< ;,..:) de c,,,._ ~ D ~ RA 4-k ..C:-. tk,~)L.i,,\..--h=~--..,t:cU,...1..f,U...!.~..c.i==:..:,._~;:,.t...U.~-...::ut..e.!...~~~~..1-...1:.~~~ .:r:.c 13,cl>i ~s.;i.::r '"1. I>c..k·t-#/s {?_er.· ·'D "B""'IU.,O f;-22· .qc; Field Representative #__,_7'-_,. __ 'Pl_/ __________ _ CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: To the best of my knowledge, all of the reported work, unless otherwise stated, is In conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. INSPECTOR'S NAME {].,-i, va v'l 1-'H. I c. v-c.~ "'.'.),=' )/10 (Pnnl Clearly) lNSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE ~c..-...--·--;-;;:. 0-'-~ S iL//t) CERT. NO.-___,___._.,__,._..__ ___ _ DATE s -~ B\ -c;'9 Form#003 a1·d osvovaa do1:so oo sa unr Testing Engineers ~ San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page i of --- Project Name _ _..L...,u,,,_c.=· -=<'...,_,.-...,_-r.,_· _ __,'f'--'c. .... (..,_._.b_._v"l,.,_,, ..... l_..a __ 1+-i~· e..._"-" ___ ,. ________ TESD Project # __ q-t-..,-11--..... !~1!--C_, ____ _ Address -----''"".;J..,.J.,.0"-'-1__,f,._,<,..,,.,__,( "'°--"'-'d.......,e...;',"'ll'--,--,-.... G--·,,_r._.{~~b.wA-......,.1'·'------------------------1 General I Subcontractor $', , "i ·, o <"'•-/.,~,.-. :t W<', Jiu,"<} f I l Building Permit # _ __.C=--B-....5-5 ..... t,,...i-.7-b ______ DSA # ________________ =-- Plan File# OSHPD # _______________ _ Government Contract# Other __________________ _ INSPECTION MAT'L SAMPLING QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION i~:ON CHECKLIST _Lconcrete __ $oil --L__ Cone: Mix #/psi 3C.tU.:i- _ Prestress Cone __ Base --_Cone: Mix #/psi 50 "3-3CC (:, Specifications __ Masonry __ sutgrade --__ cone: Mix #/psi Sizes __ Struct Steel __ Asi:halt Concrete ...!:L ___,_C__ Rini: Rebar l.Hll l 5.--.C.· r ,,c _£,_Slump f:/..~ •' __ Fireproofing _L Cor,crete Cylinders __ Rini: W.W.F. "1.Air Content _ Pile Driving _ Corn: Flex Beams --__ Rini: Tendons Temperature Zi' __ Non-Destructive __ Rei if. Steel --__ Grout: Mix #/psi =zUnltWeight . __ Batch Plant _ Terdon (PT Strands) --__ Mortar: 'fype/psi Co~lidallon __ Soils Technician _Mc 1ar Samples -_units: Block __ Electrode Storage _Mechanical __ Gre ut Samples --__ Units: Stock _ Torque Applied __ Electnc:al __ Ma ionry Prisms --__ s1eer __ Load (Pounds) _Bolt Pull-Out __ Ma;onry BlOCK --__ H.S.Botts __ Thickness __ Roofing __ steel --__ Metal Decking -- _ Waterproofing __ H.f,. Bolls --__ Electrodes --_DSA __ Fimprooflng --_Fireproofing -- --OSHPD __ Ro~fing --_ Other __ CotrectiYeactionrequired ___ --Specialty __ 01t,er --__ Corrections compleled _ Remarks 7))}Sn.-·,· i('.I tbe 0111.l','tnr:ai u•-/' C,·a,:,-;i; £,-mcoS.o:a,,·<t /L,,·c.,."icarn<n-1 va.-,i t · r 1/ 7 ·f~cl;oy5c•M,·l cyui,?;n,..,/ ~..-1.s-L.clu'//r;r &1,·1r~-.-.,r-'T·-g·) r-!a.,..I /o Ac,tSr'. ~.,,(,,-;,4,,• • .,I , 1 1 r v pt) " s· c,,..-1-Kc,: .. ..-, ·s 1/,1 ) \ 3i .,_I __._,i....--.=w•-"'''1_· _,,3"'--2-2"'-IC...--~Y ....... l--.... a'-"tC...:.::.,.,_· ,_l_).,__....,___B.i.:.'£.C~t'.r;..I.,,_, .!:Al:..., ,_J,__.st-....,fc.:_1"....,.,;..:.;....._(.,_f.......:..S:::;.";,.:ch..:..,·.:.<?..:.f_s_·__:~:...:--c.....- cf vi . . ·1!. g;ir.,.a,1..) Ji,.;f..,Nt::tf,;; Field Representative # • t W 1vLt.fl:}- CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: To the best of my knowledge, all of the reported work, unless otheiwise stated, is m conformance with the approved plans and specifications a11d the workmanship provis\ons of the applicable coda. S<f7 CERT. NO.--'""-'...,... _______ _ Formw003 Sl · d osvovaa do1:so oo sa unr ' & I .,_ TESTING ENGINEERS SAN DIEGO (619)-715.SBOO FAX 619 715-5810 PROJECT PROJECT ADDRESS CONTRACTOR ARCHITECT/ ENGINEER BLDG. PERMIT NO. REPORT OF RE~PORT OF COMPRESSION TEST LUCENT TECHNOLOGY 2101 FARADAY AVENUE SWINERTO,"J & WALBERG CO. MEISSNER & WERST/ PRIME STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS CB991519 PLAN FILE NO. ----- SAMPLE DATA NIA [) CONCRETE [] MORTAR O GROUT D HS GROUT O PRISMSO OTHER PLACEMENT DATE 5/29/9!:} DATE RECEIVED IN LA6 6/1/99 SUPPUER HANSON MtX DESIGN PSI 3000 ------------- MIXNUMBER 303300 MIX DESCRIPTION 1" ROCK NIA TYPE OF CEMENT------'...;.:_:_---~-TICKET NO. 790463 ADMIXTURE NIA SLUMP (IN,) 4 1/2" MIXING TIME (MIN) ------41 AIR CONTENT{%) NIA CONC. TEMP.( °F) ------------74 AIR TEMP .(°F) NIA DESIGN STRENGTH (f 'c) PSI 3000@ 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY R. MATHES LOCATION OF PLACEMENT EQUIP VIENT P.L (NITROGEN TANK MIDDLE-S-EC_T_I_O_N)_F_O_O_T_IN_G_A_LO_N_G ___ _ PERIMETER OF MECH YARD (CHILLER AREA). LABORATORY DATA AGE DIMENSIONS TEST AREA MAXIMUM LOAD COMPRESSIVE (DAYS) LAB NO. DATE TESTED {inches) (sq. inches) (lbs) STRENGTH (psi) 7 21398 6/5/99 6X12 28.27 79,000 2790 28 2'1399 6/26/99 6X12 28.27 102,500 3630 28 21400 6/26/99 6X12 28.27 104,000 3680 H 21401 7/24/99 6X12 28.27 DISC ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING Pf::RFORME;) IN 13ENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM TEST METHODS. 'ACTUAL MEASURED AREA. REMARKS: TWO 28 DAY TESTS COMPLY WITH PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. . . CHECKED BY: DATE: -----=-- REVJE~ED BY: R DO~~Jlfl~ DATE: ,? ~ OSvOvZB dz!=so oo sz unr m - Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT VVc..f..U1e,Sd4 y Page 1 of -- Project Name Luc en+ Te .. c I, n Q letq y Address .2.IDI Fa.v:0.day Av-~ TESD Project# _9._9'..,__-..... l_'l...,o=------ Cac/s b~d Cc.. J,:C.,rn;a • I ~ " General/ Subcontractor s,,,,, n .J. e r-1-o n I Wt< !he o/ -s;· e rra~ ,,.<;_,fp_ e I Building Permit #_.C ........ 8 .... 9L.J9...,/e...::.:2.==-'t:~/J---------DSA # _________________ _ Plan File# __ 4't,1~liu:A1.,-. ___________ 0SHPD # ________________ _ Government Contract # Nu __,_._..<...=._, _______ Other :£:, b ::f"?j -S-¥09: INSPECTION MAT'L SAMPLING __ concre1e .l!J/Lson __ Pres tress Cone Base __ Masonry Sue grade ...J.L_s1ruct Steel Fte./d Wekl,",y As~hall Concrete _____ Fireproofing Cor crele Cylinders __ Pile Oriving Cor .c Flex Beams __ Non-Oestrvctive Reiif. Steel __ Batch Plant Ten~on (PT Strands) __ Soils Technician Mo,tar Samples __ Mechanical Grcui Samples __ Electrical Mauonry Prisms __ Bolt Pull-Out Ma11onry Block __ Roofing Ste!I __ Waterproofing H.S. Bolts __ OSA Fire proofing --OSHPD Rooling -Specialty __ Other QTY -- MATERIAL DESCRIPTION .J:1./A_conc: Mix ll/psi Cone: Mix If/psi ___ _ Cone: Mix #/psi ___ _ Rini: Rebar-~--- Rini: w.w.F. ____ _ Rinf: Tendons ___ _ Grout: Mix #/psi ___ _ Mortar: Type/psi ___ _ Units: Block ____ _ Units: Block ____ _ A.5111. Steel A.5tJdic. B __ H.S. Botts ____ _ __ Metal Decking ___ _ .£MAfi'Erectrodes E'70['l __ Firaprcofin~--..,-.--- Other /:). k /2 1~~, [$. --1 ;l \. 1: 'x ,A?rs. INSPECTION CHECKLIST ..12£:.....Ptansf:;,/:"Atwec/ __.cu;:__specificalion• 4./'l(.ll!';z..l!!!.d .-aJ;:...Size~ CAe.{;t:;ed __ slump _____ _ __ Air Content ____ _ __ Temperature ___ _ _ Unit Weight ____ _ __Consolidallon ___ _ ...t21f._ Electrode Storage ,.r..,::=-:"'-"-'.11 __ Torque Applied ___ _ _Load (Pounds) ___ _ __ Thickness -:-.-----:--:--- ..0-k... Cec-ht,¢d, /,/elde,,:S __ Corrac:tiveactionr«ll)ired __ __ Corrections cornpleted __ Remarks Revi'eJ~ proje,c.-f pion 51 ~pec.;£~ci0tt Sj A Isa tci·svp../ly It) 'i/}<.cfe J p;~o a11 l'1.. "x l2''x Y+' -tu be .S:fee I Cc:..lw·nn s f(l 1:'x l".l,,'';r ¼ 11 he a.to tuhe Sit:.'-! n,-eml. e.cs fe,..,,,, ~':! a./: Lawer he_;!Jb-1: m<chanit:.(',,.I !t;c.fa:rvr:e. locede.J · af ea .. (I s,'Je o.£ b-1V1 !dr',:,; ~ We /dins Of £, 'Ile b We {ck ·, S I 11 pco.gre.s.S . Field Representative #_~_. __ ~ __ J_L_l-u ________ _ CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: To the best of my knowledge, all of the reported work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable cqde. INSPECTOR'S NAME G11i'Her:mo Ba.e.z.. 1Pnni Clearty) INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE /J,j_klV,o ~, Q ost-ovaa cERT. NO. 34-3 c;ht t.?l $,." D~:11' DATEl°me! Cf 1 / '1']'} Form#003 dso:so oo sa unr .. : . ·, m Testing Engineers .. San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct.1 Suite 18 Page_1_of ___ _ -San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Project Name Luce.rd· kc 6 no l'ff-__________ TESD Project# _9"---F--2_-_._l_,_9'-"'tl..__ ____ _ Address 2./0( Fa.ro..da~ Ave . r . Caxts bCA d,. Co/, t-ro...L~ .......,,""------------------------- General I Subcontractor S1,y1r,e,d-on/ Walber_J -£err-a . ffeej Building Permit #..),C~B~9 ...... 9:...,..l-2.__,_';/: ________ DSA # N/A Plan FIie # MLA OSHPD #_NL.L.;..l....,s'-------------- Government Contract# N Its Other J~b +F 9'i-S4P4: INSPECTION MAT'L SAMPLING QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION INSPECTION CHECKLIST __ Concrete J:ll.JL Soi tf/..A_ Cone: Mil< #/psi .-0&...Plans __ Prestress Cone Cone: Mix II/psi ....()./5;.....Specllications __ Masoniy Sultcrade Cone: Mix #/psi _a};;__ Sizes .L._ StructS1ee1 field WefcJ,~J Asphall Concrele Rini: Rebar ..J:YA.s1ump __ Fireproofing Concrete Cylinders Rini; W.W.F. --1:::!fs.. Air Content __ Pila Orivin9 Co11c Flex Beams Rini; Tendons ___Q/;;_ Temperaturet,/1/Un, ve, 'rrrh ~' i __ Non-Oeslructive Reint. s,eel Grout: Mix #/psi JJJ.tg_ unit Weight __ Batch Plant Ter don (PT Strands) Monar: Type/psi ~Consolidation __ Soils Technician Mo1ar Samples Units: Block .QJ:::.._ Electrode Storage __ Mechanical Gr1,u1 Samples Units: Block Ji..lA_ Torque Applied __ Electrical Masonry Prisms A 5'TMsteet A51)o 6c B __ Load (Pounds) __ Bolt Pull-Out Masonry Block __ H.S.Bolts __ Thickness __ Roo!lng Steel __ Metal Decking --12.E_ Ce.,-h~iJ b!e.lru.r::S __ Waterproofing H.S:. Bolls 5~Electrodes f'"'/t;J?, __ OSA Fm1pr0or1n9 __ Fireproofing --OSHPD Ro)tlng __ Other __ Coneclive aclionre,:\uired __ --Specially Olher __ Corrections completeel ~ Field Representative #_1G __ l3_1r._b_lJ...Lv ___________ 1 CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: To the best of my knowledge, all of the reported work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions ot the applicable code. lNSPEcroR·s NAME _G~u ..... / ...... ue ..... r: ....... m.,_,__,..._o _ _.B~a~ez.~r.r---------(Prlnl Clo=rly) CERT. NO. 34} Ci+y of hf\ t>f.f:jD INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE ;j ~....D---=---~--a.,_./!..A+-______ _ J DATELhme to/ l~Cfl FormP003 06t-0v28 a+u-i;od a~p-i;Jq ms dt..o=so oo sz unr-- .. ..J', ·a· ........ . ' ·, . Testing Engineers .. San Diego, lnc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 Page.J_of .. - f~ San Diego, CA 92111 ~ . . . INSPECTION REPORT Project Name 1 ucen:l: lecbaofoa \.t v I Address 2 LO J &,....a.dc...y ,Ave TESD Project# ..... 99~-~':t~o _____ _ U? r:{Sl:ua.d ) c'2 Ii'( . General/ Subcontractor 5.v-H :,,e r:bon /'"""'"'~..,0,., ....... [;..l,..,,.,e ... r_3~-------------~-.-.....,,.,,..,,....,...,,.,.,..,.,.....,.......,,,.,.,...,,__ Buildlng Permit # C. 13 :f '1 l:?s !i'. OSA# __ ..... _-_____________ _ Plan File# --------'---·-------OSHPD #-----------~--.,..__,.._..,....,_. __ Government Contract #_--"' ____________ Other_-_-_________________ _ INSPECTION ___ 9on9ret~ _......,.. f'restr~s~ Cone: __ Ma&oniy =.L Struct Steel .r;?Jd we.Id,. __ Fireproofing __ Pile Driving __ Non-Destructive _ Batch Plant _Soils.Technician __ Mechanical __ Electrical __ Bolt Putl,Out __ Roofing __ Waterproofing __ OSA --OSHPO -Specially MAT'L S,~MPLlNG ..)l/!Lso11 Base Sutgrade As~halt Concrete Cor,crete Cylinders Car ,c Flex Beams Rei 11. Steel Ten:lon (PT Strands) Mo,tar Samples Grcut Samples Mauonry Prisms Ma11onry Block s1e~1 H.S, Bol!s _ Filfprooling Rorrting Other __ _ QTY MATERIAL DESCR!Pi"lON __ Cone: Mix #/psi __ cone: Mix ttips1 ___ _ __ Cone: Mix #/psi ___ _ _ Rini; Rebar ____ _ __ Rini: W,W.F, ____ _ __ Rini: Tendons ___ _ __ Grout: Mix #/ps1 ___ _ __ Monar: Type/psi ___ _ __ Units: 8fock ____ _ __ Units: Block _ __,=---- A.s.:Ir::1. Steel /VJVO f.J (' i3 __ H.S. Bolts ____ _ __ Metal Decking ___ _ f.CJlLAIEtectrodes /57/7-1[ __ Fireproofing ____ _ __ Other _____ _ INSPECTION CHECKUST .a.£...Pians _____ _ .p}S_specifications ___ _ _{)lS_Sizes _____ _ __ stump _____ _ __ Air Content ____ _ ~ Temperature Prehr.ef __ Unit Weight ____ _ __Consolidation--,,-.....,...--- .Jtl;.,_ Electrode Stotage......,o:.:...s.u:i,;;, __ Torque Applied ___ _ __ toad (F.ounos) ___ _ _Correciiveactionregi,red -... -.-.- .,,,...,...,.,.Corrections completed _ Remarks V,'svevfly inspe.c.fei £1up c;i.h d £· Ukf Midi; 12-~ /4Lr.J[ aS Ftc..rt 1Jroove, we-Ids an 1:':xl:J.},'/tt''fuf;_e. -Steel 60[11-Pa·hd nu.n,/2e..cS fa l.:2/1xt21:X½:1 ' G,lw-na( a£ /ob[e.r.J,eiphi lnec.A4-n1c.e,. l ec,c/o5'vr, lo c.ated a-J. f:A~-f &de of /Jro.lr·c+-, ' I ' k/e../d,,nJ-LS In pt:oyre $'5 . . Field Representative•\;:;-. ,:;::,L~,-" ' , 7'? 6-tlff CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: To the best of my knowledge, all of the reported work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and 1he workmanship provisions of the applicable code. INSPEcroR·s NAME Gv;lleruw ;6~ei.e ( nnt !early) CERT. No. 3 l./ 3 cif ~ of SD. INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE ]'.;,Jlwv<! ~ DATE\lime /II /Cf/'1 FonM003 os?otas aq.u~od e~p~..iq ms dlo:so oo sa unr Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page 1 of l ---- L ' ci I · ~0£,-1·co. Project Name ---"'"'-=l1.~C~e--=--A~-\-,__ __ i_,t_"".,_,'"""--..,__~-=-'-Y\->:.>=O::...i~a-<.,:S""<--'-i =c:~-~,.__ ____ TESD Project # _1~~-~-~L~~---- Address d la J G ""Os ci(c_j General I Subcontractor <_s.L.} ,~~(' ,t-..\-.cH'.\ -4--t.__)o_ \ ~('..J'c Building Permit# c rs 9 q ; a-7 C) DSA #~_) ________________ _ Plan File# ________________ OSHPD # _________________ _ Government Contract # _____________ Other ____________________ _ INSPECTION MAT'L SAMPLING QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION INSPECTION CHECKLIST _/4'crete (ZC'..--b-.._,,,-__ Soil --__ Cone: Mix #/psi --__ Plans __ Prestress Cone __ Base --__ Cone: Mix #/psi __ Specifications __ Masonry __ Subgrade --__ Cone: Mix #/psi __ Sizes __ Struct Steel __ Asphalt Concrete --__ Rini: Rebar .A le L s: __ Slump __ Fireproofing __ Concrete Cylinders --__ Rini: W.W.F. __ Air Content __ Pile Driving __ Cone Flex Beams --__ Rini: Tendons __ Temperature --Non-Destructive __ Rein!. Steel --__ Grout: Mix #/psi __ Unit Weight --Batch Plant __ Tendon (PT Strands) --__ Mortar: Type/psi __ Consolidation --Soils Technician __ Mortar Samples --__ Units: Block __ Electrode Storage --Mechanical _. __ Grout Samples ----Units: Block __ Torque Applied --Electrical __ Masonry Prisms ----Steel __ Load (Pounds) __ Bolt Pull-Out __ Masonry Block ----H.S. Bolts --Thickness __ Roofing __ steel --__ Metal Decking -- __ Waterproofing __ H.S. Bolts --__ Electrodes -- __ DSA __ Fireproofing --__ Fireproofing -- __ QSHPD __ Roofing ----Other __ Corrective action required ___ __ Specialty __ Other --__ Corrections completed ___ Remarks_ ·-,-n > lye ¼:-c< ( ·-f L r(\ t ( h 0, •'\ l CC-. l '\ ICt .tA (?C.:>f,,fv'-t-l._ N:iv,!1.-:.ai.:..r;-<:'.~c::<..\ 111'-,±p.\tc.{.;LJ;.~ k.;-:i¼ k·c--J_ i 'f) S ---..> f>r--:· ck.{c;_ ;( c;~~J__ S £': C' 5~ l) ,-:n 'f>Ab,{Llo 5·tt·'1q Field Representative # __ ,=:.., _______________ _ CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: To the best of my knowledge, all of the reported work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. INSPECTOR'S NAME a/6y C.. !:'."\ Y1 t, 1 G. CO.V\ ~ i/\0 0 (PrintCI~=---~ INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE v::4£c) i.) 0,..A-A-:-::-::-1P....A.C,e1,,,.,.~==---.J _c;---=--;_y_._· ,"----8"""'-. ) ___ _ CERT. NO. DATE 'S --~ t -C{'7' Form#003 Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page_1_of-l- Project Name Luc_c."-k ICC hVto \ 05 i ~ ~ Address £ i O \ ·&, J'O. de. y TESD Project # q 'i'...._/ 2 f3 General / Subcontractor S Cd !. ,,, e. v--+-o '"'.\ ~ t-Jc, l £ <'1 J' c:1 Building Permit# C (Sqq -iJ..7 0 DSA -; _________________ _ Plan File# ________________ OSHPD # ________________ _ Government Contract # _____________ Other ____________________ _ INSPECTION MAT'L SAMPLING QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION INSPECTION CHECKLIST --Concrete __ Soil --__ Cone: Mix #/psi --__ Plans __ Prestress Cone __ Base --__ Cone: Mix #/psi __ Specifications __ Masonry __ Subgrade --~Cone: Mix #/psi __ Sizes __ Struct Steel __ Asphalt Concrete --if R1nf: Rebar Au i s;--__ Slump __ Fireproofing __ Concrete Cylinders --__ Rini: W.W.F. __ Air Content __ Pile Driving __ Cone Flex Beams --__ Rinf: Tendons __ Temperature __ Non-Destructive __ Rein!. Steel --__ Grout: Mix #/psi __ Urn! Weight --Batch Plant __ Tendon (PT Strands) --__ Mortar: Type/psi __ Consolidation --Soils Technician __ Mortar Samples --__ Units: Block __ Electrode Storage --Mechanical __ Grout Samples ----Units: Block __ Torque Applied --Electrical __ Masonry Prisms ----Steel __ load (Pounds) __ Bolt Pull-Out __ Masonry Block ----H.S. Bolts --Thickness __ Roofing __ Steel --__ Metal Decking -- __ Waterproofing __ H.S.Bolts --__ Electrodes -- __ DSA __ Fireproofing --__ Fireproofing -- --OSHPD __ Roofing --__ Other __ Correcilve action required --~Y~);:)0~~ __ Other 1//;;, bt:. --__ Corrections completed ___ _i ,4-t( Field Representative #~R,_'t_SJ>f> __ IU,D_-___ ~_-_"l_2_·_'1_CJ ___ _ CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: To the best of my knowledge, all of the reported work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. s ;,.-11 B CERT. NO._.=.....,__,____,__,....,__ ____ _ DATE £-~ e-c;:'9 Form#003 Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page_1_of_ P · N L -h 1 -TESD P · t # r? 0 -L q c roJect ame --""'-"u"'-"c.=-· e...=..n...:.....c•'-----'. 1-'e.->=>,c__<:.1u..i.Y1.J..LJ.c1__,__,._o"--+1{_,,_,,e'---"'c:-___________ roJec __ :::,.__,_-,.t-+---++-"~1 _____ _ Address ___ ...<;d ... · +I .... O«....Ll_..,_6 ..... ,~dwc..,, .... ,_d=->.-... -..... ,1-l ---,----'G-'-=a_,_;-...,__{-"'s"--b~"=.,,...,<',.,._ ________________________ _ I General / Subcontractor __ S:1-L..< "'-' .,_,,·,....,a...,__,,_e.,__,-_~,__,(,.,_::.>:...-......,.,___:=f:..1.-....,W:....i...<,_.',._.l..,,L"-J ..._e,,_".,ci.__....,J.__ ______________________ _ 1 7 Building Permit # __ =C=--.=.B..__._J49_,i...,.-~"-7~0 ______ DSA # _________________ _ Plan File# OSHPD # ________________ _ Government Contract # _____________ Other ____________________ _ INSPECTION MAT'L SAMPLING QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION INSPECTION CHECKLIST ~Concrete __ Soil --~Cone: Mix #/psi :J<.,"J.w-?f""' __ Prestress Cone __ Base --__ Cone: Mix #/psi ?c,3 3('<) e:., Specifications __ Masonry __ Subgrade --__ Cone: Mix #/psi Sizes __ Struct Steel __ Asphalt Concrete ---t-L. Rini: Rebar tH, L s_·:t_;. r ~c __ Slump {;/_}£_ •' __ Fireproofing _JL_ Concrete Cylinders A_ ___ Rini: W.W.F. 7Air Content __ Pile Driving __ Cone Flex Beams --__ Rini: Tendons __ Temperature Z-5' __ Non-Destructive __ Rein!. Steel --__ Grout: Mix #/psi 7Unit Weight --Batch Plant __ Tendon (PT Strands) --__ Mortar: Type/psi __ Consolidation --Soils Technician __ Mortar Samples ----Units: Block __ Electrode Storage Mechanical --__ Grout Samples ----Units: Block __ Torque Applied --Electrical __ Masonry Prisms ----Steel __ Load (Pounds) __ Bolt Pull-Out __ Masonry Block ----H.S. Bolts --Thickness __ Roofing __ steel --__ Metal Decking -- __ Waterproofing __ H.S. Bolts --__ Electrodes -- __ DSA __ Fireproofing --__ Fireproofing -- __ OSHPD __ Roofing --__ Other __ Corrective action required __ specialty __ Other --__ Corrections completed Remarks z f\f-5,,,,, .f,.j th c o lec t". ,nca l o' f1 C,•o c ,,,;t;_ -£, .-~ . r tnc ,•/. a a,· c·a / l--:: C ,,,'/)mcof V6 t,./ t/ T I -f~o tio 1-s c,--,-, ,.f e,n,,'£J;n,-,~../ /4 d.S Lehi/er IV /fre· ,·. r:r-, ~ I I Pc.,./ <; .;:,)... Keo.-...,.., s ~t.1 ) 1 3; I CJ.,,,... ,J 32 2 (<! 1--o ft:,./ ) ·r~-t<" ~ o~.., ,/ ;o hc,1 S <' .P,cc;,,,,-un,, .. Ji 7 V 7 n,z,y , 0th .. -,,,~ e--1-' ,. <' •• l'"!,,r &<-_t C,. I .u,,, ~ ~ ;t' ./ I .,-~, 9.?, C v, C. ,, " ( 4(7 .PJ s a ,P ,· ; << _ / v -r,1,,'S-0 . I .,,c,1--.o ·l!,. 73/>DJL,t,J .Jww t!tfc-i.J Field Representative #--------~--~.,...,.....------1.J bLtEt'-d- CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: To the best of my knowledge, all of the reported work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisi,ons of the applicable code. S-;?°7 CERT. NO.-»<-=--L---------- Form#003 TESTING ENGINEERS SAN DIEGO (619)-715-5800 FAX (619) 715-5810 REPORT OF COMPRESSION TEST ATLANTIC CITY* RAHWAY* ORLANDO* SAN DIEGO* FT. LAUDERDALE PROJECT LUCENT TECHNOLOGY PROJECT NO. 99-190 PROJECT ADDRESS 2101 FARADAY AVENUE ------------------------------ CONTRACTOR SWINERTON & WALBERG CO. ARCHITECT/ ENGINEER MEISSNER & WERST/ PRIME STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS BLDG. PERMIT NO. CB991519 PLAN FILE NO. N/A SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF [8J CONCRETE D MORTAR D GROUT D HS GROUT D PRISMS D OTHER PLACEMENT DATE 5/29/99 DATE RECEIVED IN LAB 6/1/99 SUPPLIER HANSON MIX DESIGN PSI 3000 -------------- MIX NUMBER 303300 MIX DESCRIPTION 1" ROCK TYPE OF CEMENT N/A TICKET NO. 790463 ------------ ADMIXTURE N/A SLUMP (IN.) 41/2" MIXING TIME (MIN) 41 AIR CONTENT(%) N/A ------------ CONG. TEMP,( °F) 74 ------------AIR TEMP.(°F) N/A DESIGN STRENGTH (f 1 0) PSI 3000 @ 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY R. MATHES -------------- LOCATION OF PLACEMENT EQUIPMENT P.L (NITROGEN TANK MIDDLE SECTION) FOOTING ALONG . PERIMETER OF MECH YARD (CHILLER AREA). LABORATORY DATA AGE DIMENSIONS TEST AREA MAXIMUM LOAD COMPRESSIVE (DAYS) LAB NO. DATE TESTED (inches) (sq. inches) (lbs) STRENGTH (psi) 7 21398 6/5/99 6X12 28.27 79,000 2790 28 21399 6/26/99 6X12 28.27 102,500 3630 28 21400 6/26/99 6X12 28.27 104,000 3680 H 21401 7/24/99 6X12 28.27 DISC ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM TEST METHODS. *ACTUAL MEASURED AREA. REMARKS: TWO 28 DAY TESTS COMPLY WITH PRO_J!=CT SP!:;CJFICATIONS. CHECKED' BY: · DATE: I-£- ---------- Mondo...y Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 Page_1_of_ San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Project Name Lucen± T-e.c.h no fog)1 Address 1/f, ~ = r:d~t . . __ 15 b_ d ~' C_ I, Corn La.. General/ Subcontractor Sw1oer1:oy1 fbla-1 be..ry Building Permit# C, 13, 9Cf f 2.70 TESD Project # _'1~9_-~l~'1~D~----- DSA # __________________ _ Plan File# _________________ OSHPD # _________________ _ Government Contract # _____________ Other _____________________ _ INSPECTION MAT'L SAMPLING QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION INSPECTION CHECKLIST 1--Concrete __ Soil --3~onc: Mix #/psi 3o~ ___j)_js__ Plans Re"1t.1e.vJe.d .. _a/s._ specifications: Rev,ewei:I __ Prestress Cone __ Base --__ Cone: Mix #/psi __ Masonry __ Subgrade --__ Cone: Mix #/psi ---12E;_sizes Cli~c:.Ee.d __ Struct Steel __ Asphalt Concrete --i\~inl: Rebar br-&<Jt. {,,Q __a_fs;._s1ump __ Fireproofing l.$e±.. Concrete Cylinders -¼-__ Rini: W.W.F. _·_Air Content __ Pile Driving __ Cone Flex Beams --__ Rini: Tendons _..Q}s_ Temperature --Non-Destructive __ Rein!. Steel --__ Grout: Mix #/psi __ Unit Weight --Batch Plant __ Tendon (PT Strands) --__ Mortar: Type/psi 0}:::. Consolidation //, 6 r:cd:cr- --Soils Technician __ Mortar Samples ----Units: Block __ Electrode Storage --Mechanical __ Grout Samples ----Units: Block __ Torque Applied --Electrical __ Masonry Prisms ----Steel __ Load (Pounds) __ Bolt Pull-Out __ Masonry Block ----H.S. Bolts --Thickness __ Roofing __ Steel --__ Metal Decking -- __ Waterproofing __ H.S. Bolts --__ Electrodes -- __ DSA __ Fireproofing --__ Fireproofing -- --OSHPD __ Roofing --__ Other __ Corrective actJon required __ specialty __ Other --__ Corrections completed ___ Remarks Inspec-kd te;r>fm-,;°5 s·+ee.l .Col-" >;z.e. j t::'1-d.,e ? lcicemeh-±. a nJ C[ecu-cw,e \ ; as: I /1 1 1 well ,ns placel'.b£n± of ConcceJ-e cad:: ea.sf ,Side. of-bu,-!d,·nJ rnecbC<.n;Ca ( evic.los:r.:wes Cvcb,5 o,nc;f S:{gb t>h 9raJe, A J..ufz-.«,{ of. .4-o.o Cub;, yca-ds plCtc.e.d Field Representative # _________________ _ CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: To the best of my knowledge, all of the reported work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. \ INSPECTOR'S NAME Gu, He..r-mo BMZ {Print Clearly) INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE-)_Jt-v.~·J=L~~-G=ru¼...=---"l;.-----~---d' CERT. NO. 343 C.1+~ of-: Sun D,~-o DATE Tune \4,. J'f}9 I Form"003 Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page_1_of_ Project Name Lucen+ lec.bnolo3y TESD Project # _q__,___,_C[_-_,_[_,Cf....,,,0"---------- Address ~ ~ 1 ZI:at (torn jg General/ Subcontractor StJJi ne.r-l-oV\ / bk.I b:P) - Building Permit# C, B qq 1210 S ,·-e_~r&t. ~-fee..[ DSA# _, NI A - Plan File# ___ .--____________ OSHPD # _. N /A - Government Contract # ___ -_.,_[\J---'/._A_,... _____ Other __ __. _ __,_,N~)_A~-------------- INSPECTION Concrete __ Prestress Cone __ Masonry J... _L__struct Steel f,e.JJ We.I IY'lj __ Fireproofing __ Pile Driving __ Non-Destructive __ Batch Plant Soils Technician Mechanical Electrical __ Bolt Pull-Out __ Roofing __ Waterproofing __ DSA __ OSHPD __ Specialty MAT'L SAMPLING ..l:Y..fA_soil Base Subgrade Asphalt Concrete Concrete Cylinders Cone Flex Beams Reinf. Steel Tendon (PT Strands) Mortar Samples Grout Samples Masonry Prisms Masonry Block Steel H.S. Bolts Fireproofing Roofing __ Other ___ _ QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION J:JiL Cone: Mix #/psi Cone: Mix #/psi ___ _ Cone: Mix #/psi ___ _ Rinf: Rebar ____ _ Rini: W.W.F. ____ _ Rinf: Tendons ____ _ Grout· Mix #/psi ___ _ Mortar: Type/psi ___ _ Units: Block ____ _ Units: Block ____ _ ~Steel A3fo1 Ar:;po Gr. B. H.S. Bolts _____ _ __ Metal Decking ____ _ ~Electrodes f ?IT-/ I ____ Fireproofing ____ _ __ Other ______ _ INSPECTION CHECKLIST _oj;_Plans Revt~wed __!2_Lspecifi:t1ons R.-f v,~wed ---b.}5;.._sizes Cbrc f;.~d __Slump ______ _ __ Air Content ____ _ --Ok-Temperature ____ _ __ Unit Weight ____ _ __ Consolidation ____ _ __.t2./::_. Electrode Storage ___ _ __Torque Applied ____ _ __ Load (Pounds) ____ _ __Thickness _____ _ Ji;.:_ Pt~+>-<;11fl-7-c,--~--,~ ..P/s_ eea;~ie.J Jw.rdeo __ Corrective action required __ _ __Corrections completed __ _ Remarks Performed v,·socd ·,nspe.c.-h'on on p,:+i.2p o..od [,·11e,-1: Wdd.5 Connec.i(ny 4x tik}'q-1 I -f:ub~ S:l:e.-e I ho;,zoo:1-a I t'c.,_M ·, n:o/ toe-01 ker:S +o /;::;. ''x 121)< y .. ,U fu he. ~+ee I (1/umo S cc± 1<-{3-1>1) t vl--u Field Representative # __________________ _ CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: To the best of my knowledge, all of the reported work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. INSPECTOR'S NAME Guille.r:toa 5cafcZ \Print Clearly) CERT. No.343 Ci:hr cl S'Clb 1?,,o INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE ,-c./j-=,,=j ...... L~~-A~a-e-A-~--------DATE l.,,ne 15; I qq9 Form#003 Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page_1_of_ Project Name Luc.e.nf /ecboology Address 1-J b I Ea ra. d a., y . Ave (A}:lSbA-d, Co.J,£orr/1A TESD Project # _jL-9.....__-_.{_'-}........,..D _____ _ l General I Subcontractor S"'w ~ n er+on /4'4 / be-rg Building Permit# C, 8 C/CJ /1.70 DSA #~N----'----'/<-L---------------- Plan File # ..., N/p, -OSHPD #--L..J<....<./-<=---------------- Government Contract# -Arif~ Other }/ /4 -+· .......... ---'---'---------- INSPECTION MAT'L SAMPLING QTY Concrete --/,J)p_ Soil __ Prestress Cone Base Masonry Subgrade =z= Struct Steel F, e. / J. We /d '1 Asphalt Concrete __ Fireproofing Concrete Cylinders __ Pile Driving Cone Flex Beams __ Non-Destructive Reinf. Steel Batch Plant Tendon (PT Strands) Soils Technician Mortar Samples Mechanical Grout Samples Electrical Masonry Prisms __ Bolt Pull-Out Masonry Block __ Roofing Steel __ Waterproofing H.S. Bolts __ DSA Fireproofing __ OSHPD Roofing __ specialty Other ___ _ MATERIAL DESCRIPTION -P/IL Cone: Mix #/psi Cone: Mix #/psi ___ _ Cone: Mix #/psi ___ _ Rini: Rebar ____ _ Rini: W.W.F. ____ _ Rini: Tendons ____ _ Grout: Mix #/psi ___ _ Mortar: Type/psi----,- Units: Block ____ _ Units: Block ____ _ ~Steel A£dt7 G,-. 8 .N.i!__H.S. B~lts _____ _ Metal Decking 6 "lt>HI ~Electrodes p VT--/1 __ Fireproofing ____ _ __ Other ______ _ INSPECTION CHECKLIST .2K_ p1ans Rene.wed ~Specificationf' &;t1el#U _/J/_&Sizes ______ _ __.fdA_s1ump _____ _ -t!..lfl_Air Content ____ _ _£X.__ Temperature ____ _ -i,liA:.__Unit Weight ____ _ ~Consolidation ____ _ !2£._ Electrode Storage .8,d()Len t!..L/l_ Torque Applied ___ _ .!Yf..&_Load (Pounds) ___ _ ~Thickness ____ _ a1::._ CeHLl:e c1 1,1elderS .A);;,__ ~'Ei ........ rD0......,_p __ _ __ Correctiveactionrequired __ _ __ Corrections completed __ _ Remarks Perfon::ned Coa+'rovo11< V,sval ,~so2cfJ;b on £-!u,.., o.hJ We¼ ,w ::d'l.2xl/4.11 I T -,f-'' iv.be S'fcel hor:'r:2..on-l-a I f'_r-a o,,"n,J /nPh'JberS ±o 12. ~x 12)' /IE/' -/v,b<:. .. C'fee./ CoLvmnS Oh lo(Ar CU1d h;9J, f>?echt:<.n./cq,( ebC,(oSUrfS /oeta.-1,J qf eq,,S-/ S:'de. of hvtfdt'tJJ I hh/J/'j ,s /o pr-01p---eS5, Ak:12 lnspec~ed filleJ--welds Db elevg..for fvhr S+c..eJ JuiJ-c. ra~Lr ~-frucdvrc;;/ a.fl:gchmenf$ fo t..KtWny gu--de"/, loca--fec:/ qi £,'n;>hed /'loov fa mez.-z~,,;"',e elerro.ft2C gr:dt:ne< ~/4 I • welds ku.ve ,,ku.n, CoiYlpfeied et> Per vl-rvcfvnal Cnfll{)~ l ,, • r\ r _/ ... CICl.t:t crco.. Tl On '¥rA,W tn) ,l;Jcefcbes, R, frMvlA.,,u Field Representative # _________________ _ CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: To the best of my knowledge, all of the reported work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. INSPECTOR'S NAME ~G,..,.£.....,n~· l~le.=r~m__._.o_..__~B-t::J,,_..,:f-eZ..,..._.,. _______ _ (Print Clearly) ' ;f ' CERT. NO. 343 c,+y o Suh Di'tfv INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE Jj.:J,J,,,,_-'l /:3 7 DATE= Jw,e /~ /Cf'C/1 Form#003 Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 Page_1_of_ San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Project Name Loce.nT Tecb,,rnfog\r l Address ~~ ,:-=::! ;2.: ;t: i« General / Subcontractor ,)i,.,, ·,, e cdn n ,/½Ca /l., < 'j Building Permit # C, B '1 q 12 'J.o TESD Project # ~9._C-J_,___-.L../---=-q-=O'--------- DSA #__,_,"-S-=----------------- Plan File# _ __._t,....,.._1~/_,_A.,__ ___________ OSHPD #-'N~/.-'-'----------------- Government Contract #.~Af~/~1q~ ________ Other --''--"·:..:./.LO... _______________ _ INSPECTION MAT'L SAMPLING Concrete __ti__/tL Soil __ Prestress Cone Base __ Masonry Subgrade __L_struct Steel heJ::l /J!.fd1~ Asphalt Concrete __ Fireproofing Concrete Cylinders __ Pile Driving Cone Flex Beams Non-Destructive Reinf. Steel Batch Plant Tendon (PT Strands) Soils Technician Mortar Samples Mechanical Electrical __ Bolt Pull-Out __ Roofing __ Waterproofing __ DSA __ OSHPD __ specialty Grout Samples Masonry Prisms Masonry Block Steel H.S. Bolts Fireproofing Roofing Other ___ _ QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION _tf/__A__ Cone: Mix #/psi Cone: Mix #/psi ___ _ Cone: Mix #/psi ___ _ Rinf: Rebar ____ _ Rini: W.W.F. ____ _ Rinf: Tendons ____ _ Grout: Mix #/psi ___ _ Mortar: Type/psi ___ _ Units: Block ____ _ Units: Block ____ _ A.Sm. Steel A 5"PO Gr 'l, H.S. Bolts _____ _ __ Metal Decking ____ _ ~-Electrodes E ZIT?-I I __ Fireproofing ____ _ Other ______ _ INSPECTION CHECKLIST _a_.t;::__p1ans fRg v,ewrd r ' J2j:;___ Specifications R-ewr'Yed. _t,l/A_sizes ______ _ ±Slump Air Content ____ _ -OJ;::._ Temperature ____ _ .bJ..IA_ Unit Weight ____ _ ~ Consolidation ____ _ _Qj;:___ Electrode Storage ___ _ ~ Torque Applied ____ _ .:..t!/p__Load (Pounds) ____ _ ..ifll;L_ Thickness ----~- _Qj;;;__ Ced:,£ e J W ~ lle.r: ~ ~ .... £;~,..,-f~,...,11n'""' ____ _ __ Corrective action required __ _ __ Corrections completed __ _ Remarks PectormeJ V,sual ,~specbon Oh £1:vp anJ We.Id~ on 1-''xl2~'k½11 hoi-12-0 '2-I-A I fvhe ~fn•{ f'rtaP1iH'j/YJrmber:S f12 /1':-cJZ"x'/,1/'ful)t >"-1-e-e/ C.ofumt>S of fuy~ fro?'i/e Field Representative # __ 'R_,_~_Hw_~ ___________ _ CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: To the best of my knowledge, all of the reported work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. INSPECTOR'S NAME Gu,1/le.rmo 8a.e.Z • • (Print Clearly) INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE ;jr.,y.•Jluw,-0 ~,,. 0 CERT. No.113 c:-1-y a+ ~h .Dreyo DATEJ~he L ':f; /'j9'j Form=003 - Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page_1_of_ Project Name L ucen f I ec hnolo1y TESD Project # _o/-'--+?:--~L~o/~D~----- Address2/o / & coda y Ave Cat: LsbC< d . Ca /, ·.fo,,...n iC(, I General I Subcontractor S'w in e C Toh /wa lJ:,'-Y Building Permit # C, 13 '79 lo?-7-a DSA #--1.~/.---______________ _ Plan File # N /er ' OSHPD #__.N--"--"-/._,_~~-------------- Government Contract #~N~/2=KJ~ _________ Other -~~~----------------- INSPECTION Concrete __ Prestress Cone __ Masonry • J Jc'd, , ~Struct Steel r,e/ We I __ Fireproofing __ Pile Driving __ Non-Destructive __ Batch Plant Soils Technician Mechanical Electrical __ Bolt Pull-Out __ Roofing __ Waterproofing __ DSA --OSHPD __ specialty MAT'L SAMPLING JJ!..lAsoil Base Subgrade Asphalt Concrete Concrete Cylinders Cone Flex Beams Reinf. Steel Tendon (PT Strands) Mortar Samples Grout Samples Masonry Prisms Masonry Block Steel H.S. Bolts Fireproofing Roofing __ Other ___ _ QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION .IJI/S_ Cone: Mix #/psi Cone: Mix #/psi ___ _ Cone: Mix #/psi ___ _ Rinf: Rebar ____ _ Rini: W.W.F. ____ _ Rinf: Tendons ____ _ Grout: Mix #/psi ___ _ Mortar: Type/psi ___ _ Units: Block ____ _ Units: Block ____ _ AST/llstee1 ,4.r;ooGc, @> .!Y/.JL_H.S. Bolts _____ _ J:llA_,Metal Decking ____ _ ~1ectrodes c1![-r I __ Fireproofing ____ _ __ Other ______ _ INSPECTION CHECKLIST _/;K__Plans ______ _ ...(2K._Specifications ____ _ ~Sizes ______ _ ~Slump ______ _ $Air Content Temperature ____ _ Unit Weight ____ _ __Consolidation ____ _ a)!::__ Electrode Storage ___ _ tJ/A Torque Applied ____ _ NlrJ Load (Pounds) ____ _ _l!f&__ Thickness _____ _ _Qi[_ <:PJf,:her/hlelJ«s ...QK. 5ivp __ Corrective action required __ _ __Corrections completed __ _ Remarks 'f~orme cl hSv&t. I b?S/?ec:-hon On .c· -1v12 r:a /'I cl We,k/s 6t2 7: )(/,2 'fe ¼: ,, /20 ~ Zani-a I fu h.e. ~-fee I Carn/o/ tnern,6et:S In l;z':x:a'xif '' lobe .5'-fee I _Cot,1n4 r ol lz1h pcoh.le (32'-0 11/uyl) jnec.hc,,z,cg_/ cncl~orf lacalecl ()'tr/s';rle. of ±ie. eqs£0cle 1Jf: bu;JJ~Jtl. bfe I J ;t1} I ~S: ia p coj re.££ • [) Field Representative #_.....:c']2Li_?'fJ_-E_"f2;_1_P:_7._rlJ>_i_U-,u _______ _ CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: To the best of my knowledge, all of the reported work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of_ the applicable code. INSPECTOR'S NAME _G........,t...,11,...L~/e__'L,~ln~O~~E~a..,,.,L.,..2....-~--------(Print Clearly) INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE L1.......,,.=~-~~.....,_-<-/4~~=o--------- CERT. NO. -:JL/3 0-iy <1.f h12, DATE,hlne J'J_ L'J'fCf V / Form#003 Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Wed11e.sdo.. 'I Page_1_of_ Project Name l ucen + Te..c /., no fog y TESD Project# _9,__,.Cf_-~l~:t~o~----- Address 2 I O I Ft;Lv:0-d. C<. y ·A v-e. · • . Ca r: / s bo d , Ca. I, +n rrz Ja.; General/Subcontractor S, .. na-1:er-fon fwA lher:y S, ... erra_ Siee I Building Permit #_.C~B._'lL--9._/....,.a=-<-'t, .... t;'--_______ DSA # _________________ _ Plan File# --""'N,,...b~tl~ ___________ OSHPD # ________________ _ Government Contract #_t/LLLL..C:,/J,__ ________ Other J.,, b ;:;-rt-S909- INSPECTION MAT'L SAMPLING Concrete .JJ/JL_soil __ Prestress Cone Base __ Masonry Subgrade ~StructSteel ne.ld We.lcJ,~ Asphalt Concrete __ Fireproofing Concrete Cylinders __ Pile Driving Cone Flex Beams __ Non-Destructive Rein!. Steel Batch Plant Tendon (PT Strands} Soils Technician Mortar Samples Mechanical Grout Samples Electrical Masonry Prisms __ Bolt Pull-Out Masonry Block __ Roofing Steel __ Waterproofing H.S. Bolts __ DSA Fireproofing __ OSHPD Roofing __ Specialty __ Other QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION ~Cone: Mix #/psi Cone: Mix #/psi ___ _ Cone: Mix #/psi ___ _ Rini: Rebar ____ _ Rini: W.W.F. ____ _ Rini: Tendons ____ _ Grout: Mix #/psi ___ _ Mortar: Type/psi ___ _ Units: Block ____ _ Units: Block ____ _ A$1]:!_steel fJ..SDOfu • .B H.S. Bolts _____ _ __ Metal Decking ___ _ .£MAh'.'Electrodes l?ZtJ!i __ Fireproofing ____ _ I I/ /I IL T.S __ Other :2 )( /2 ~/~ • J • ti\. t: 'x !/+ ,7rs. INSPECTION CHECKLIST .12LPJans f!;,v.r:.'wed _QJ;;_specifications 4fv~ _OJ!;:.__Sizes Chc:cJ:ec/ __Slump _____ _ __Air Content ____ _ __Temperature ____ _ __ Unit Weight ____ _ __Consolidation-~--- ~ Electrode Storage~=..:"'--"-';.., __ Torque Applied ___ _ __ Load (Pounds} ___ _ Thickness ~---- .L).ls:._ G?e-1-,f;~J tle,ldt...rS" __ Corrective action required __ _ __ Corrections completed __ _ Remarks Rev,'ewecl proje.c..-f plan 5; S:pe.c.;£,~a.f11:m Sj Also 1,dsua_Uy ,""a 5;Jec-fe J £;-1:vp an /2 11 )( /2,''x Y+' -fube S+ee.l Columns fo 1:"x 12."x Y4 11 h~"-m iuhe. Sf"-<-/ n,emhe.rS {,...41,,,,,,~?J o.-f. lower heiJb+ m~chaoic.ed f!be-losvre. locorde-d · af ea£-I s,·de of b4.1i/<l,':Jj /fiii1 w~ fd.i~ Of [i'lle /-We Id> ·, $ in progY"e$S , Field Representative #_~_. __ '0,J>-l> __ J_).__L-u _________ _ CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: To the best of my knowledge, all of the reported work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. INSPECTOR'S NAME Gu,'Her:rno BaR.--z., [Print Clearly) INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE /j..Jk,,,,,.,o &wt cERT. No. 343 c;+,1 of ~" D;:fD DATEJ:zn<Z CZ. l'l't'l I Form#003 Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page_1_of_ Project Name L1 L c.en-f Te.c b a o lo3 y Address 2/0 I Fa.red.a_,'/ Ave TESD Project # _9'-+-9_-___,__J_,_9-t2'------- • /I • CDr::/5 b4 d , Ca I, torn la.. • ,I General/ Subcontractor Sw1 nedon / Wal;ber:9 S;~rclA. . flee../ Building Permit #_,,(_(3L-9..__9..._..._./ 1..,,_,_';/-___ ----' ___ DSA # NIA Plan File# NIA OSHPD #__._.N~/~Jq~------------- Government Contract# N /p. Other .1P,b +F 92-S4Cf)-. INSPECTION MAT'L SAMPLING QTY Concrete Jl..LJ1_ Soil __ Prestress Cone Base __ Masonry Subgrade L_ Struct Steel F,,e Id We Id 1 'nJ Asphalt Concrete __ Fireproofing Concrete Cylinders __ Pile Driving Cone Flex Beams Non-Destructive Rein!. Steel Batch Plant Tendon (PT Strands) Soils Technician Mortar Samples Mechanical Grout Samples Electrical Masonry Prisms __ Bolt Pull-Out Masonry Block __ Roofing Steel __ Waterproofing H.S. Bolts __ DSA Fireproofing __ OSHPD Roofing ____ Specialty Other ___ _ MATERIAL DESCRIPTION J:1../A_ Cone: Mix #/psi Cone: Mix #/psi ___ _ Cone: Mix #/psi ___ _ Rini: Rebar ____ _ Rini: W.W.F. ____ _ Rini: Tendons ____ _ Grout: Mix #/psi ___ _ Mortar: Type/psi ___ _ Units: Block ____ _ Units: Block __ -.,,. __ A.STMstee1 A.57:x, Gr B H.S. Bolts _____ _ __ Metal Decking ___ _ 'S~Electrodes £7t;J?, __ Fireproofing ____ _ __ Other ______ _ INSPECTION CHECKLIST ....11l;_p1ans ______ _ _a/S._Specifications ____ _ _a1;._sizes ______ _ --1:!b!_s1ump _____ _ NIA Air Content-----=-- ()/:::. Temperature,/llfJ2,f!! "M ,P,.</i - .fJJitL__ Unit Weight ____ _ ../)J}..fL Consolidation ____ _ QJ::.._ Electrode Storage __ _ .1':!./.A_ Torque Applied ___ _ __ Load (Pounds) ___ _ Thickness ---~- _QE_ Cedtttid Welcle.,-( __ CorrectiveactJon required __ _ __Corrections completed __ _ Remarks v,~vo..lly /~<peeled £'!le.I-Cthcl !/4re ffr001re. ·Welds On 1-:x 12,'k Y'-( ,, ful,e. S"f,e/ /2or:1-Z:.onf4 ( rnembec:S: P2 /2x12):7<t" ColvmoS o{ /awe.r me.c/2a.a:ca{ Field Representative #_'JG __ l3_~_b_l LLD--------~~ CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: To the best of my knowledge, all of the reported work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. INSPECTOR'S NAME __,,,G,,._.,.._u ..... , c ..... te_._r,_,_m--=--'o"'--__._..B'i='a.'i"-!e"'=-,:z.. ________ _ (Print Clearly) CERT. NO. 343 Ci+y of kh 0,'e.yo INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE ..,,e.;j~.-""~"'·"-""'-~_p../)...c..w,,~""",,1,.__ ______ _ J DATEJvne IOI 199'3 Forrn#003 Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page_1_of_ Project Name Lucen± lecbinolocr '-,' Address 2 IQ J Fa..r-o.._c./.4-y /t Ve TESD Project # _'19.._....__-_,/'-'7.....,0=-------- LJ:2.r[Sba,d J Ga /;for:n;a, General I Subcontractor St,.2, :.,,e,r±on /wp.)/2:e.rfj Building Permit# C B 'tCJ /2. 9-DSA # __ ..., ______________ _ Plan· File# ________________ OSHPD #_-_______________ _ Government Contract #_----" __ "---__________ Other_-___________________ _ INSPECTION Concrete __ Prestress Cone __ Masonry _L_struct Steel he/d Weld,' __ Fireproofing __ Pile Driving Non-Destructive __ Batch Plant Soils Technician Mechanical Electrical __ Bolt Pull-Out __ Roofing __ Waterproofing __ DSA --OSHPD __ specialty MAT'L SAMPLING Jl/A_Soil Base Subgrade Asphalt Concrete Concrete Cylinders Cone Flex Beams Rein!. Steel Tendon (PT Strands} Mortar Samples Grout Samples Masonry Prisms Masonry Block Steel H.S. Bolts Fireproofing Roofing Other ___ _ QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION __ Cone: Mix #/psi __ Cone: Mix #/psi ___ _ __ Cone: Mix #/psi ___ _ __ Rini: Rebar ____ _ __ Rinf:W.W.F. ____ _ __ Rini: Tendons ____ _ __ Grout: Mix #/psi ___ _ __ Mortar: Type/psi ___ _ Units: Block ____ _ __ Units: Block ____ _ A.S:lli.. Steel A $"00 6 r B H.S. Bolts _____ _ __ Metal Decking ___ _ f CJll,JElectrodes £7/r: I/ __ Fireproofing ____ _ Other ______ _ INSPECTION CHECKLIST .a.};___p1ans ______ _ .o.}S__specifications ____ _ ..().lS_Sizes ______ _ __Slump _____ _ __ Air Content ____ _ -DL Temperature f,-e. hcef __Unit Weight ____ _ __ Consolidation-----,..--- -12E,,__ Electrode Storage....,_,._,=--"""--"..., __ Torque Applied ___ _ __ Load (Pounds} ___ _ __ Corrective action required __ _ __ Corrections completed __ _ Remarks v,·sv&A,/fly inspekfeJ btup O-h cl f: Ue:+ .M,ld» Qt.$"' ht(..[/ as D()<.rf 7roove we.Ids an 4-;c/~''x 1At''--l-ube Sieel 6or;ua-h&I mtlhhe-r-S fa l.2"1>cl2 1'>: &'' Ca/vp,n£ D[ /or::er he,jh± lne.chc...n,c.c,, I et,c/o5'vrc /a c:.q,fed a-/-ea&+ &de al fraJc~+:, /.Je.Jd, nJ IS In pr:oy r:eS.s CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: To the best of my knowledge, all of the reported work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications ancj the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. 1NsPEcToR·s NAME _G___..uc..,..;._l{e_~"--<rof-'-'--"'o------,,_B~e:t~e--:i-~------(Pnnt Clearly) INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE _,,_Jj~J"""j"""W'-".\?=, ~-~.......-=M)"-¥-<------- CERT. NO. 3 Lf 3 c;.J-'1 of SD, DATr:,ltme II. Jqqq T Form#003 Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page_1_of_ Project Name Lvcen -1: TecAnohJf -Tennaaf Irn:provem~n I TESD ~roject # _C/~f_-.z../~1~6~------ Address 2/0/ £a.ea da.y All'e Carls b4J7 Ct +ocn 14.. General/ Subcontractor -¼1Me.cl:on / M Lkecy Building Permit # C .L3 291:2. tzo DSA # N/1'4 '! Plan File# -+/f. ...... :/2<-<,q'--'-___________ OSHPD # ..... N'--'-L/_.._t3_,___ ____________ _ Government Contract #_~N~~~FJ~ _______ Other --L-'--1-,'-+------------------ INSPECTION MAT'L SAMPLING QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION INSPECTION CHECKLIST Concrete __ Soil ...t:J/8_ Cone: Mix #/psi ....:/l.K._ Plans ______ _ __ Prestress Cone __ Base Cone: Mix #/psi ___ _ _()J;_specifications ____ _ __ Masonry • __ Subgrade __IL_Struct Steel Fte/J-j,,/e,/oh, __ Asphalt Concrete __ Fireproofing __ Concrete Cylinders Cone: Mix #/psi ___ _ Rinf: Rebar ____ _ Rini: W.W.F. ____ _ _1}15::...sizes ______ _ ..fi/A-s1ump ______ _ lli.A_Air Content ____ _ __ Pile Driving __ Cone Flex Beams Rini: Tendons ____ _ .1l.J;::.._ Temperature ____ _ Non-Destructive __ Reinf. Steel Grout: Mix #/psi ___ _ .f:!.iA_ Unit Weight ____ _ Batch Plant __ Tendon (PT Strands) Mortar: Type/psi ___ _ _pl,4_ Consolidation ____ _ Soils Technician __ Mortar Samples Units: Block ____ _ ..Pl;;__Eie;trode Storage ___ _ Mechanical __ Grout Samples Electrical __ Masonry Prisms __ Bolt Pull-Out __ Masonry Block __ Roofing __ Steel _. __ Waterproofing __ H.S. Bolts __ Units: Block~---- A5'£&_steel ASoo6c B Ji.M__H.S. Bolts _____ _ __/!ll!...Metal Decking ____ _ ~lectrodes E'JJ T..-ff fl/ A Torque Applied ____ _ ~Load (Pounds) ____ _ ~ Thickness --~---~- __al;_ • eJ ...of;:_ __ DSA __ Fireproofing !!.1A_F1reproofing ____ _ __ OSHPD __ Roofing ~Other ______ _ __ Corrective action required __ _ __ Specialty __ Other ___ _ __ Corrections completed __ _ ... Remarks Conf,'nuo,)$ v/5uct I ·,nsD<>C-f,on Der£qrmed t:>/1 We/els C:.onect/"J hor1z..ord·M I r v -1:vbe S'-le~L J9,emlur5 fa ~o/utnn _-/2,be,__£fcef mt-,nh-u--.s al lu;6-e.c of ±tvo R. rf>P-f>!Ll-D Field Representative # _________________ _ CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: To the best of my knowledge, all of the reported work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. INSPECTOR'S NAME G,, ,llu:mo B"'e:z. " (Print.Clearly) CERT. NO. jL/3 Cj.J-~ of ha /)J~ INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE ~lj-""L.lo<4i"l,,''~ ..... ¼+v.o=~&~a=7---,:;--------DATF ,hihe 2/1 /qCJ'J Form#003 Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page_1_of_ Project Name Lvcenf Tec.hnalo!lf -Tennca,i b-iJ>rr:wer-1-t!.n+ TESD Project # ..... 9_.9_---=-/_1....,tJ"'-------- AddressJ_Jol Ft?,,n~.J~y Aw: · C rls/2ad. G./4 hrn ;a 7 -~ • ~ General / Subcontractor Sh_u;e,.. ton /waf6ecy Building Permit# CB 99 /:) 10 DSA#_,__~P---------------- Plan File# ---L../v-=....L-/,-J:J'--___________ OSHPD #_,__N-:...+-/-=lit:...-------------- Government Contract# tJ/4 Other N /A -,,I'--"--"-'----------- INSPECTION MAT'L SAMPLING QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION INSPECTION CHECKLIST Concrete ..l!/!i. Soil ..JJJ./.A_ Cone: Mix #/psi ..D.$-Plans ______ _ __ Prestress Cone Base Cone: Mix #/psi ___ _ ~Specifications ____ _ __ Masonry , Subgrade ~ Struct Steel /'J e.Jd J-k/J,riy Asphalt Concrete Cone: Mix #/psi ___ _ Rinf: Rebar ____ _ ...b}:;,.._s1zes ______ _ __ Slump _____ _ __ Fireproofing Concrete Cylinders Rini: W.W.F. ____ _ __Air Content ____ _ __ Pile Driving Cone Flex Beams Rinf: Tendons ____ _ 12}!;._ Temperature ____ _ __ Non-Destructive Rein!. Steel Grout: Mix #/psi ___ _ __Unit Weight ____ _ __ Batch Plant Tendon (PT Strands) Mortar: Type/psi ___ _ __Consolidation ____ _ Soils Technician Mortar Samples Units: Block ____ _ .l)/;:..._ Electrode Storage ___ _ Mechanical Grout Samples Electrical Masonry Prisms __ Units: Block ____ _ A ~TM Steel f\5O0 Gr B __ Torque Applied ___ _ __ Load (Pounds) ___ _ __ Bolt Pull-Out Masonry Block __ Roofing Steel __ Waterproofing H.S. Bolts H.S. Bolts _____ _ __ Metal Decking ___ _ fCAW Electrodes £7/1--/ { Thickness ~--~-~ {Pc-/:ift;d W<IJLrS J4;:._ ..... f~l+~u_p __ _ __ DSA Fireproofing __ Fireproofing ____ _ --OSHPD Roofing __ Other ______ _ __ Corrective action required __ _ __ Specialty Other ___ _ __ Corrections completed __ _ Remarks c') nh~ vau.$ r,~val In 5 pe.ct,'on e~r£ormec:l (21'/ W<,/Js Connec..ft~j hor;z:..on-1-o.. / I I fu/;eSk."'I &a.m,~9 lnrl1?hers -1:o -fube§feel Co/vrnn$ ¢ b17~er of /-wo 01echez11,~a{ enclaSoces, W12LJs: bC4-ve been Carnple./-eJ fo met+ t:c.7~tren,,-ehl-,: -4£ plec.h~ Je.-h:..Jls1 Sa.e~,h~0±,ans oioJ Wetd,h_J Code an fwo of two rnechant'ca I enclo£vres I , ' focafe.d a+ {!)trf Sfcfe of--.f!..O\.S-f porf1on t2f bt;1/~tttJ. ..,I {) 1l ~/Llo Field Representative # _________________ _ CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: To the best of my knowledge, all of the reported work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. INSPECTOR'S NAME _G__,,,_u ...... 1 t~1e__r~M~0~1-B....,ia='-:t'.-.,;!c-....,..,.....-------<Print Clearly) CERT, NO. 3Lf3 C 1-l-y of Q b J>1f!° INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE ,,_Lj....._._,J,..,..~.<-C¼a~wvV~_fi..._RA-.,,~,,__------DATE fuhe 2:S, /CJCJCJ Forrn#003 Sep-10-97 10:12 . P.02 (,C'k) €) _.___ ______ --..... _ .. ______ I --+ >utk --------t~!W c,"(l'lf'P ,r:i1 1;(/ I ~ I I . i ! °' W' 1l~1k .,,,.)j -if· -- D1 ~ o.'h(. 177-'1<~r-t-/,o'b .. I ~-~{ :;. <'lt!} FH::-, (u,'f' v;i ~ lt "Pf7[ f-. I ~r ,,_ !lb{,~ flf' f i, ~ tt~ fJl 'l ! t. < f l.f' ~ ! , o E>" i-1/i1v-c, ( -==-I 71, i · l ~(,,, ~~~Cf?J._1(f'lf)l l,oe/ 'f-rt/ '1-1A"l--f;f ,:-;.-fbb,O l1'f,~I f'F L,J ( ~ 0-. 4,? )(.1'?,1{ f t,f' ( '7·' ,t /, r;,g) )( ~s£ ~ u ~ti -.,I F7/ ~Q ~ {Le.of (!,._.? lb<u;, f7f-~ +t;?' 'lC'. }0.,~ ~ lt;",J, flf 1 ~ l~O )(µ ~ ' ' \/ I' -( q ,,~ 1<ii~~, :t IV-,; f. tJ,1<; 1 flt.~,,~ t;.. 'l-f i-K. ~ >'4>· -v rlf" ~~ U:?-ir<Qv\fhV Dl-4 ~ -~ ~v o\J-6--tv -=J,Lt:jh>~ p~, oe \f&f · ;:;,;:; ~~f-'1~ ri ~ /.p~ ?fi,J or6,J 'i-'11' Sep-10-97 10:13 --------------------------------~----------- Considering P-Delta Effects SEAOC "Green Book" To iterate P-Delta effects to convergence DESCRIPTION :PlER A ALLOWABLE STRESSES ------------------ } fie : Concrete :: 3,000 !}Si > Min Vert Steel 7. : 0,0025 >Fy : Reinf. = 60,()00 psi > Min Horiz Steel X : 1),0015 > Ph1: 0.90 Max. ~1ert. Spacing :: lf,.53 in } Se1smic Factor = 0.3 Max. Hor iz. Spacing :: 18.00 in > Wind Load = 20,15 psf Feta i = (1.B5 > Reveal Depth ;c 0.75 in (}. 6 x Rhow-Ba!<1nced:: o.om > Reveal to Bottom= 17 ft Shali Uniform LL Be Used With Wind/Seismic loadings? Y=l N:O --: 0 DESIGN DATA ( Enter All Loads UN-FACTORED} } Cl ear Wall Ht, ;:: 27,5 ft ) Eccentric Dead Load= 165 plf ) Total Wall Ht. = 32 ft } Eccentric Live Loatl = (1 pl f Ht / Thk Ratio ::: 44.0 > Load Eccentricity = 7 in (default= t/2 t 3"l > Wall Thickness = 7.5 in } Rebar Size Ill' 5 } Uniform lateral Lsad= 2.37 plf ) Rebar Spacing = 12 in } X-Dist, to Bottom = I'; ft ., } X-Dist. to fop = 32 ft ) Depth To Steel = 3,75 in } Seisaii,::::1 1 Wi nd=2 --) 1 <-- (default = ti2) } Rebar 5pacing@Reveal= 12 in > Point Lateral Lo3.d = 0 ll > Axial Uniform DL = 179.91 plf } X-Dist. from Bottom= ~ ft } Axial ·Unifc,rm LL= 0 plf > Seismic=!, Wind=2 --} 1 {-- Steel at each face= 1 (1 for single layer, 2 for double layers} :-------------------------------------------------~---------------~ : DESIGN SUMMARY ! -------------- M-n t Phi : 110NENT CAPACITY Mn i Phi) Mer O.K. M-u : APPLIED NOHENTS OVERSiRESS = = SEISMIC WIND 63,824 in-lt 631824 iolt! 25,428 inJ! 0.0 7. : HEIGHT i SERVICE DEFLECTION : SERVICE LOAD DEFL.@CONVER6ENCE = = 52, '.383 in-I 0.0 i. 435 0.76 in 1,913 J 0. 17 in : ~-v"' " -:\'li <' ,,i<r : DESIGN SUM~ARY at REVEAL PIA < 0,04 i fie, O,K. . ~-------V f (,,c.;r : ~---------------------Provide additional ff /o·:.c; 5 M-n I Phi : MOHENT CAPACITY = Mn I Pin } tier O.K. M-u : APPLIED MOMENTS = OVERSTRESS = HEIGHT/ SERVICE DEFLECTION = : SERVICE LOAD DEfL.@CONYERGENCE = 49,0 1n-t 4~1041 inffi OVERSTRESS ! !tin 1 Ph-> Mer O.K, 1,387 i o P/A < 0,04 t Pc, O.K. 21 1564 ini: (;,(I % 1,641 0,201 ;------~-----------~·~-------------------------------------------------{ P.03 Sep-10-97 10:13 LATERAL LOADINGS Wall Wt@ 150 pcf = 93,8 psi Lateral Wal! Wt = 28,1 psf Wind Loati • 1,275 = 25.7 psf lateral Wt f 1,403 = 39.4 psf VERTlCAL LOADINGS At revel P-1hial : P-\.iall . . PIA ::: Pu-Axial: Pu-Wall : 345 pl f 1J 745 • 23.2 psi 362 pl f 1,833 • 345 pl f 11406 " 21.6 psi 362 pl f 11 477 " 0.04lf'( 120 psi Pu-Total: 2,195 plf ANALYSIS VALUES As(eff) = [ Pu:lot ~ (Astry) l I Fy 'a1 = (Asify + Pu) i(.85t!1ct12) 1 Cr= 1 il I f , 85 Phi : Capacity Reduction factor Mn= As(effi f Fy f ( d -a/2) Mu = Mn t Phi E : 57,000 * (f'cA.SJ n : 291 00(1 / Ee fr : "od. of Rupture : 5ti flc".5) Section Modulus : (Gross) Moment Capa,ity@ Cr~ck.ing ~SI fr Moment of Inertia: (Gross) Mo1ent of Inertia: (Crackedj Unfadored seisllliC React i ,)n at support level = 567. 76 pl f Reaction at Base : 408.07 plf --------- = 0.347 in"2!ft = 0.680 in = (I. 799 in = 0.9 = 70,915 in-I = 63,824 in-i = 3.1£+06 psi = ':l.29 = 273. 9 psi : 112,5 inA3 = 30,809 in-t = 421.9 in"4 = 30.1 in"4 wind 375.16 plf 269.64 plf AT REVEAL -------- 0.341 in··-2 0,668 in 0.786 in 0.5 54, 4']1) ir.-i 49,041 jn-ll 3.1Et06 psi 9.29 273. 9 psi 91.1 in"'3 24, 95& in-ll 30i.'5 in·'4 17.5 in~4 Nmax at 13.38 ft 13, 38 ft, from base P.04 • PRIME JOB: ,,. STRUCTURAL DAlE: _ ENGINEERS SHT : Sep-10-97 10: 13 PRE-CAST CONCRETE WALL PANEL DESIGN Considering P-Delta Effects SEAOC "Green Book" fo iterate P-Oelta effects to rnnvergence DESCRIPTION :AT PIER B ALLOWABLE STRESSES ) f'c: Concrete } fy : Reinf. = 3,000 psi = 60_.0Q(I psi > Phi: 0.90 > Seismi( fa(tor = 0.3 } Wind Load = 20. 15 psf } Reveal De~th = O. 75 in } Reveal to Bottot = 17 ft ) Kin Vert Steel l: } Nin Horiz Steel 7.: Hax. Vert. Spacing= Hax. H~riz.Spacing = Beta 1 :: 0.6 x Rhow-Balanced:: Oc0025 0,0015 lf..53 in 18. 0(1 in O.B5 0.0128 Shall Uniform LL Be Used With Wind/Seismic Loadings·? Y=l N=O --} 0 DESIGN DATA ( Enter Ali Loads UN-FACTORED) > Clear Wall Ht. = } Total Wall Ht. = Ht / Thk Ratio = } Wall Thickness = } Rebar Size '~' ) Rebar Spacing = ) Depth fo Steei = (default = ti2i } Rebar Spacing@Reveal= } Axial Uniform DL = ) Axial Uniform LL= Steel at each face= 2i .5 ft 32 ft 44.0 7.5 ill 5 12 in } Eccentric Dead Loarl = > Eccentric live Load= } load Eccentricity = (default= t/2 + 3") 175 pl f 0 pl f 7 in >-Uni fori!I Later al Load: 11. 02 pli ) X·Oist, to Bottom = 0 ft } X-Dist. to fop == 32 ft 3.75 in > Seis11i,:=l, Wind"2 --:-1 <-- 12 in ) Point lateral Load = 0 I 526.2 plf > X-Dist. from Bottom= 0 ft 0 pl f } Seismit=l, Wind=2 --} I (-- 1 !1 for single layeri 2 for double layers) ~--------------·------------------------------·------------------------~ ! DESIGN SUMMARY SEISMIC wrnn : -------------- M-n • Phi : MOMENT CAPACITY = 641855 in-# 64,855 inB: Mn ¼ Phi / Mn a.K. M-u : APPLiED KOMENTS = -----~ 73,317 in-ti 131430 inti; ____ -·· / ~ ~ ,/ OVERSiRESS = HE£6HT / SERVICE DEFLECTION = 'C_us.__} ------3,605 : -· ~ SERVICE LOAD DEFL.@CONVER6ENCE = Oeflect1on Exceed!!! 2,37 in O.OS in : PIA { 0.04 t f1c1 O.K. : DES16N SU"MARY at REVEAL : ----------------------Provid~ additional ff ~ @ M-n i Phi : MOMENT CAPACITY = 491824 in-i Mn i Phi} Mer O.K. OVERSTRESS '.!Mn*?. 1 M-u : APPLIED MOMENTS = 6 OVERSTRESS = HEIGHT/ SERVlCE DEFLECTION = : SERVICE LOAD DEFL@CONVERGENC,E = 3.052 in Deflection bceed! ! ! PIA< 0,04 f f'c, 0.¥.. 2,071 int: O.(l;:. 15,874 1),()21 ;------------------------------"---------------------------------------i P.05 Sep-10-97 10:14 LATERAL LOADINGS Wall Wt@ 150 pcf = lateral Wall Wt = 33,8 psf 28.1 psf Wind load 1-L275 = Lateral Wt J !.403 = VERTICAL LOADINGS P-A}ial : 701 pl f Miall ; l, 745 • PIA = 27.2 psi Pu-Axial: 73& plf Pu-Wall : 1,833 • Pu-Total: 2,569 p1f ANALYSIS VALUES At revel 701 plf I 1406 11 26 psi 736 plf 1,477 • 2,213 plf As{eff) = ( Pu:tot + (As1Fy) ] / Fy 'at= (As1Fy + Pu) /(.851f'ci12) 'c'= 1a' / .85 Phi : Capati ty Reduction Facior Mn = As(effi t Fy * ( d -a./2 ) Hu = l'ln t Phi E : 57,000 1 (f'cr.,5) n : 29,000 I Ee Fr: Mod. of Rupture: Si{ f'cA,5} SectiQn Modulus : !Gross) Moment Capacity@ Cracking= St Fr Mo1ent ol Inertia: (6rossi No~enl of Inertia: (Cracked) Un factored seismic = = = -= :: :: :: = = = = " = Rea,tion at support level = 728.80 plf Reaction at llase = 523.83 plf 0,04H1c 120 psi (I. 353 in·'2/ft li,692 in 0.814 in (l.9 72,061 in-JI 64 1855 in-I 3, 1E+06 psi 9.29 273.9 psi 112.5 in"3 :301809 io-# 421,?. in"4 30,4 in-~4 wind 375,l6pif 269.64 pl! 25.7 pst 39.4 psf AT REVEAL 0.347 irt·2 (1, E.80 in 1},800 in 0,9 55,360 ir.-t 4'3,824 in-l! 3.1£+0& psi 9.29 273. 9 psi 91.1 in·l.·3 24,956 in-# 307,5 in'-4 17,6 inA4 Nmax at 11.38 ft 13.38 ft. irnm base P.06 -~ep-10-97 10:14 • l ' .. it;-t. AO~p7[8~ ,1,sr.fY. \1~"-7 e. ~e,t/,Af._ ~0 'oli7 ~ J:.. 0 ;r (.t.\ ,,., 0· }'3/; YJ7 . ' ~ o4y-, z-~~1 iv . '7----!:1 :t I J #o-/ , v~ ~"'n 'Y1 )l ( .. ~) P.07 ~ EsGil Corporation 1.n Partnersliip Witfi qovernment for '13uiUing Safety DATE: MAY 17, 1999 JURISDICTION: CARLSBAD PLAN CHECK NO.: 99-1270 PROJECT ADDRESS: 2101 FARADAY AVE. PROJECT NAME: T.I. & ADDITION SET: III D PLAN REVIEWER D FILE IZ! The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. D The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. D The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. _ D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. D The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: 1Z! Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. D Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone#: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person D REMARKS: By: Ali Sadre Enclosures: Esgil Corporation 0 GA O MB O EJ O PC 5/12 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (619) 560-1468 + Fax (619) 560-1576 , I t EsGil Corporation 'l.n Partnersfiip witfi (jovernment for 'Bui{ding Safety I DATE: MAY 5, 1999' ~T ~ JURISDICTION: CARLSBAD PLAN CHECK NO.: 99-1270 SET:11 0 PLAN REVIEWER CJ FILE PROJECT ADDRESS: 2101 FARADAY AVE. PROJECT NAME: T.I. & ADDITION D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. D The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. D D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. PLEASE SEE BELOW The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: SMITH CONSUL TING AIA 12220 EL CAMINO REAL,# 200, SD, CA 92130 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. D Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone#: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax#: Mail Telephone Fax In Person [8J REMARKS: Please see attached for remaining items from previous list. By: Ali Sadre Enclosures: Esgil Corporation 0 GA IZI MB IZI EJ O PC 427 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (619) 560-1468 + Fax (619) 560-1576 / s 0 fl CARLSBAD 99-1270 MAY 5, 1999 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit three signed/ revised sets of prints, to: The jurisdiction's building department. 2. Please revise the plan check note on sheet T1 to state; no hazardous materials will be stored and/or used within the building which exceed the quantities listed in UBC Tables 3-D and 3-E (except areas designated as H-3). 3. A one-hour occupancy separation is required between H-3 occupancy and the rest. [UBC, Table 3-8]. [The walls for area 413 are designated as E, which is noted as not used per wall legend. Also all the doors from this space need to be one hour (two are 20-minute rated and one none rated)]. 4. Smoke & Fire dampers shall be installed per Section 713.10 & 11 at all ducted or unducted air openings at penetrations of: a) Occupancy separation walls. A note is insufficient.. Please reflect this on M2C at all wall penetrations (all around this space). 5. Exit doors should swing in the direction of exit travel when serving any area with an occupant load of 50 or more. Section 1004.2. [This applies to the lunch-room door into the corridor ( even if it is existing). Also it applies to door 101, On line B, sheet A 1.C]. 6. Exit doors from Group A-3 & H-3 occupancies shall not be provided with a latch or lock unless it is panic hardware. [This applies to all the doors from the lunch- room and space 413 As well as the main exit doors from this tenant space]. Chap. 10. Sections 1004.3 and 1004.6. See Sec. 1004.12. 7. Please show the partitions layout (or system furniture) on second floor, sheet AO, to define the corridor to the left of line 4. This layout does not match the approved plan. [Please submit he previously approved plans to EsGil for verification]. 8. Please note where detail 3/A6 is referenced on floor plans. Section 1005.7. [Details 5 & 6 references on wall legend is not a substitute]. 9. Please show. the tube layout and sizes on S-4 over the small mechanical yard per calculations. [This was not done on S4, per response]. 10. Please show mechanical anchorage for all new equipment to be installed under this permit. Provide details and references for all on plans. [Additional structural information is required on detail 16/A3.2]. · 11. Please note all structural details on plans that require Special Inspection. Also provide the name and address of the Special Inspection team on plans. [not done]. CARLSBAD 99-1270 MAY 5, 1999 12. The Special Inspection list on S-1 is generic and should be tailored for this project. [Please note on this form all the detail numbers relevant to each item to be inspected]. 13. Please see attached for P/M/E items. • To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. • The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 619/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Ali Sadre at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. CARLSBAD 99-1270 MAY 5, 1999 + ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW + 1993 NEC + JURISDICTION: CARLSBAD + PLAN REVIEW NUMBER: 99-1270 + PLAN REVIEWER: MORTEZA BEHESHTI 1. On single line diagram sheet E8: DATE: 05/04/99 a) Please match overcurrent protection sizes on MSB with schedule shown on E9C. I.e., "2HA", "T3", "T4" and "T6" overcurrent protection values. ON SHEET 'E9C" MSB SCHEDULE: OVERCURRENT PROTECTION SIZES SHOWN FOR PANEL "2HA" AND TRANSFORMER "T2" SHOULD BE 225 AMPS; PRIMARY OVERCURRENT PROTECTION FOR TRANSFORMER "T3" AND "T4" SHOULD BE 125 AMPS; PRIMARY OVERCURRENT PROTECTION FOR TRANSFORMER "T5" AND "T6" SHOULD BE 350 AMPS AND PRIMARY OVERCURRENT PROTECTION FOR TRANSFORMER "T7" SHOULD BE 175 AMPS. 2. Please specify equipment ·in materials lab, chemical storage, and clean room areas to comply with NEC articles 510, 511 through 517. PLEASE SPECIFY CLASS I DIVISION II: LIGHT FIXTURES, LIGHT SWITCHES, AND EXIT LIGHTS IN BOTH CHEMICAL STORAGE ROOMS. Note: If you have any questions regarding this electrical plan review list please contact Morteza Beheshti at (619) 560-1468. To speed the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans. PLUMBING, MECHANICAL AND ENERGY CORRECTIONS PLAN REVIEWER: Eric Jensen MECHANICAL (1994 UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE) 1. Detail the shaft required for the combustion air duct at the boiler room on either the architectural or mechanical drawings. The shaft is not even noted on the plans. A note on the architectural and mechanical plans describing the installation of a shaft is required. 2. Detail the installation of the overflow pan and condensate secondary drain terminations for the air handler units. The secondary drains from the integral pans are not shown or described. · Note: If you have any questions regarding this Plumbing, Mechanical, and Energy plan review list please contact Eric Jensen at (619) 560-1468. To speed the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans. EsGil Corporation 'l,n. Partners/iip wit/i (jovemment for '13uiUing Safety DATE: APRIL 15, 1999 JURISDICTION: CARLSBAD PLAN CHECK NO.: 99-1270 PROJECT ADDRESS: 2101 FARADAY AVE. PROJECT NAME: T.I. & ADDITION SET:I D PLAN REVIEWER D FILE D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. D The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. [g] The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. [g] The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: SMITH CONSULTING AIA 12220 EL CAMINO REAL,# 200, SD, CA 92130 [gj Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. D Esgil Corporation staff di.d advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person,contacted: Telephone#: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax#: Mail Telephone Fax In Person D REMARKS: By: Ali Sadre Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC 4/5 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (619) 560-1468 + Fax (619) 560-1576 CARLSBAD 99-1270 APRIL 15, 1999 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST TENANT IMPROVEMENTS JURISDICTION: CARLSBAD PLAN CHECK NO.: 99-1270 OCCUPANCY: B/ A3/Fl/S1/H3 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA: 8K USE: OFFICE/WRHS/MANF/CLN. RM. ACTUAL AREA: 64,946 SPRINKLERS?: Y REMARKS: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: 4/1 DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED: APRIL 15, 1999 FOREWORD {PLEASE READ): STORIES: 2 HEIGHT: NO CHANGE OCCUPANT LOAD: 600 DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 4/5 PLAN REVIEWER: Ali Sadre This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance 'of a building permit. Code sections cited are based on the 1994 UBC. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1994 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. LIST NO. 40, TENANT IMPROVEMENTS WITHOUT SPECIFIC ENERGY DATA OR POLICY SUPPLEMENTS (1994UBC) tiforw.dot CARLSBAD 99-1270 APRIL 15, 1999 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit three signed/ revised sets of prints, to: The jurisdiction's building department. 2. All sheets of plans shall be signed by the California state licensed engineer or architect where there are structural changes to existing buildings or structural additions. Please include the California license number, seal, date of license expiration and date plans are signed. Business and Professions Code. 3. On the first sheet of the plans indicate: • The additional floor area of the mechanical rooms. • Present and proposed occupancy classifications of the remodel area, i.e., B/A3/S1/F1/H3. • The total occupant load of the remodel areas. 4. Please show the allowable areas are still unlimited. This means the H-3 and A-3 occupancies are less than 10% of the major use of the building (8, F1, S 1 ). 5. Provide a note on the plans indicating if any hazardous materials will be stored and/or used within the building which exceed the quantities listed in USC Tables 3-D and 3-E (except areas designated as H-3). 6. On the section view of the new interior partitions show: a) Shot pins diameter and embedment on sheet A6. 7. Note on the plans: "All interior finishes must comply with Chapter 8 of the USC". Specify "Class Ill flame spread rating (minimum) for B/A3/F1/S1 & H3." 8. In buildings having roofs of wood frame construction, draft stop the area between the ceiling and roof above so that no concealed space exceeds 9,000 s.f. and no horizontal dimension exceeds 100 L.F. Section 708. 9. A one-hour occupan.cy separation is required between H-3 occupancy and the rest. Table 3-8. 10. Smoke & Fire dampers shall be installed per Section 713.10 & 11 at all ducted or unducted air openings at penetrations of: a) Occupancy separation walls. b) The fire-resistive construction of corridors, or horizontal exit walls. 11. Exit doors should swing in the direction of exit travel when serving any hazardous area or when the area served has an occupant load of 50 or more. Section 1004.2. 12. Exit doors from Group A-3 & H-3 occupancies shall not be provided with a latch or lock unless it is panic hardware. Chapter 1 O. CARLSBAD 99-1270 APRIL 15, 1999 13. All doors within the exit path from Group A-3 & H-3 occupancies to a public way, shall not be provided with latches or locks unless they are equipped with panic hardware. Chapter 10. 14. When additional doors are provided for egress purposes, they shall conform to the width, swing and hardware provisions in Chapter 10. Sections 1004.3 and 1004.6. See Sec. 1004.12. 15. Please relabel the assembly area on sheet EX1, by grid point D-1, as a rated corridor. Also provide the proper legend for it in this sheet as well as sheet AO. Section 1005.1. 16. The occupancy categories on sheet EX1 should match the floor plans and the occupancy categories as stated on sheet T-1. 17. Please show the partitions layout (or system furniture) on second floor, sheet AO, to define the corridor to the left of line 4. 18. The 1-hr. wall legend on A1.B does not match that on floor plans. 19. The 20' dead end on A 1.B has exceeded by door 157. 20. Please fill in all blank bubbles on floor plans. 21. Total area of all openings in an interior corridor, shall not exceed 25 percent of the area of the corridor wall of the room which it is separating from the corridor. Such openings shall be protected by fixed glazing listed & labeled for 45 minute rating. Please show the allowable rated glass areas are not exceeded and label all such glass on plans. SheetA1.B, corridors 206 & 324. Sec. 713.9. 22. Sheet A 1.A & A3 as referenced on AO to the mechanical yard are incorrect. 23. Please label all the doors on A3.A. 24. Please complete all interior elevations on plans. 25. Please cross reference details 13 & 14/A6 on plans. 26. Please note on S-2_ what is new and what is existing. Alternatively, provide clouds or a legend for all new work versus existing. 27. If a room with an exhaust fan has a door opening into a rated corridor, show how makeup air will be provided to the room. The door cannot be undercut, nor can a louver in the door be provided .. Section 1005.8.1. CARLSBAD 99-1270 APRIL 15, 1999 28. Provide a note on the plans stating: "Penetrations of fire-resistive walls, floor-- ceilings and roof-ceilings shall be protected as required in USC Sec. 709 & 71 O." 29. Please note where detail 3/A6 is referenced on floor plans. Section 1005.7. 30. Please show the tube layout and sizes on S-4 over the small mechanical yard per calculations. 31. Please show mechanical anchorage for all new equipment to be installed under this permit. Provide details and references for all on plans. 32. Please note all structural details on plans that require Special Inspection. Also provide the name and address of the Special Inspection team on plans. 33. The Special Inspection list on S-1 is generic and should be tailored for this project. 34. Please see attached for P/M/E items. • To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. • The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation· located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 619/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Ali Sadre at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. + ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW + 1993 NEC + JURISDICTION: CARLSBAD + PLAN REVIEW NUMBER: 99-1270 + PLAN REVIEWER: MORTEZA BEHESHTI 1. On single line diagram sheet E8: a) Please specify new switchboard and MCC ratings. b) Please specify ~Fl protection for the 3000 amp main. DATE: 04/14/99 c) Please match overcurrent protection sizes on MSB with schedule shown on E9C. I.e., "2HA", "T3", "T4" and "T6" overcurrent protecti<;>n values. 2. Show the available fault current (lsc) from the serving utility co. and the service equipment including motor contributions. CARLSBAD 99-1270 APRIL 15, 1999 3. Show the ampere interrupting capacity (AIC) ratings of the service and subservice equipment. NEC 110-9, 230-65. 4. Justify above AIC ratings. 5. Specify the wire type (AL or CU) and insulation (i.e. THWN). NEC 310. 6. Show the grounding system required for the service. NEC 250-80, 81 7. Show the grounding electrode conductor size and wire type (AL/CU). NEC 250- 94. Rebar is not an acceptable grounding electrode for commercial applications in the City of Carlsbad. Please describe -what the UFER ground will be. (footage, conductor material and size, depth in footing) 8. Show the " nearest electrode" used for each transformer secondary ground system (i.e., building steel, cold water pipe). NEC 250-26(c). 9. Submit load calculations. Include long continuous loads (LCL) and the largest motor loads. NEC 220. 10. Indicate main service and the "MCC" total load demand. 11. Specify the wiring method you intend to use for this project. Specifically the Hazardous· areas.NEC510 12. Provide required transformer ventilation. NEC 450-9 13. Provide GFI protected receptacle(s) within 25 feet of HVAC equipment. NEC 210-8(b)2 & 210-63 14. Provide multiple swit~h light controls so that the lighting can be reduced by one half in a uniform pattern. The ·switches must be located within sight of the lights, which they control. CBC Title 24, Sec 131 a-b 15. Show exit signs on the lighting plan(s). at all required exits and specify them as being self-luminous or having a second source of power (battery. or generator). This is required when two exits are required per the USC 1013.4 & NEC 700-16. 16. In all occupancies wtiere the exit system serves 100 or more occupants, provide a minimum of 1 foot-candle of ef11ergency illumination at the floor level and specify a second source of power for the emergency illumination (battery or generator). USC 1012.2 & NEC 700-16. 17. Please specify .equipment in materials lab, chemical storage, and clean room areas to comply with NEC articles 510, 511 through 517. CARLSBAD 99-1270 APRIL 15, 1999 18. Please identify hexagonal shaped notes on drawings. More corrections may follow. 19. Please demonstrate compliance with Article 364 of NEC for all bussway installations, connections to, and overcurrent protection device installations. Note: If you have any questions regarding this electrical plan review list please contact Morteza Beheshti at (619) 560-1468. To speed the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans. PLUMBING, MECHANICAL AND ENERGY CORRECTIONS PLAN REVIEWER: Eric Jensen 1. Each sheet of the plans must be -signed by the person responsible for their preparation. Business and Professions Code. PLUMBING (1994 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE) 2. What is the gas line sizing to each boiler after the regulator is installed? 3. The plumbing plans show the following changes to the existing plumbing system: Installation of 3 floor sinks, the routing of the condensate primary waste for the newly installed air handlers, and the gas line extensions for the boilers and AC6A. Provide additional plumbing plans if more plumbing installation is part of this permit. 4. Detail the installation of any addition backflow devices required to be installed on . the potable water system after the main backflow device. Show location and type of backflow device to be used. MECHANICAL (1994 UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE) 5. Detail the required roof access ladder to roof mounted HVAC equipment. UMC 321.8 6. Provide the required independent ventilation or air conditioning system for the elevator equipment room to prevent overheating of the electrical equipment. UBC 3005.1 7. Detail the shaft required for the combustion sir duct at the boiler room on either the architectural or mechanical drawings. 8. Detail the installation of the overflow pan and condensate secondary drain terminations for the air handler units. CARLSBAD 99-1270 APRIL 15, 1999 9. Include all mechanical equipment requiring a mechanical permit on the floorplans (unless an equipment only permit is to be obtained, then note so on the plans). Examples would be the oven exhaust ducts, dust collection systems, furnace exhaust ducts and make up air balancing. 10. Include all permanent installed mechanical equipment on the floorplans. No hood locations or details are shown on the floorplans. The "Surface Mount Lab", Room 302, .for example, has been identified as an "H3" on the Fire Protection Technical Report, however no localized (hood) ventilation is shown, only the HVAC air (recirculated) is shown in this area. 11. If any of the mechanical systems or areas require back up electrical power, show the locations and type of electrical power to be provided. 12. What type of materials are stored in Storage Room 321? They will impact the telephone and electrical service room equipment. 13. Provide smoke detection in supply air duct of 'air-moving system' for required shut-off for smoke control as per UMC, Section 608. This is required for almost all HVAQ units. (AC6-A) ENERGY CONSERVATION 14. Provide plans, calculations and worksheets to show compliance with current energy standards. (The LTG forms) 15. The completed and signed ENV-1, L TG-1, and MECH-1 forms must be imprinted on the plans. Note: If you have any questions regarding this Plumbing, Mechanical, and Energy plan review list please c~mtact Eric·Jensen at (619) 560-1468. To speed the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans. CARLSBAD 99-1270 APRIL 15, 1999 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: CARLSBAD PREPARED BY: Ali Sadre BUILDING ADDRESS: 2101 FARADAY AVE. BUILDING OCCUPANCY: B/S1/Fl/H3/A3 , BUILDING PORTION I BUILDING AREA I (ft.2) T.I. 45,460· ADDITION 2,000 (MECHANICAL YARD) Air Conditior.iing Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE PLAN CHECK NO.: 99-1270 DATE: APRIL 15, 1999 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN VALUATION VALUE MULTIPLIER ($) 1,181,960 - [gj 1994 UBC Building Permit Fee. D Bldg. Permit Fee by ordinance:$ 3,858.93 [g] 1994 UBC Plan Check Fee D Plan Check Fee by ordinance: $ 2,508.30 Type of Review: [g] Complete Review D Structural Only D Hourly D Repetitive Fee Applicable D Other: Esgil Plan Review Fee: $ 2,006.64 Comments: Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue.doc 5196 .. ? PLANNINC/ENCINEERINO APPROVALS PERMIT NUMBER CB 99-I L-0 'O DATE __ b_,_;;-_2-_i__.[9 __ 9_ ADDRES$ d! D1 ~"'--½-::r -RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL ADDITION MINOR ( < $10,000.00) OTHER PLANNER -------- ENGINE E ~ ~£~ OoCS/MlsformstPlanntng Engineering Approvals TENANT IMPROVEMENT · PLAZA CAMINO REAL CARLSBAD COMPANY STORES VILLACE FAIRE COMPLETE OFFICE BUILDINC DATE ..,,· ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET D Estimate based on unconfirmed information from applicant. D Calculation based on building plancheck plan submittal. Address: &IOI. Ja.hc.-tL~ Bldg. Permit No.~3~::J_-_,_/_7-"'7""1-'l'--O--.--- Prepared by: 0d'8 Date: ____ Checked by: ____ Date: ,qi&,f7J EDU CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses. Types of Use: · /.. 4-i) Sq. Ft./Units: lb. (o 51 EDU's: " 1~ J Types of Use: ______ _ Sq. Ft./Units: ------EDU's: ----- ADT CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses. Types of Use: ,f 4. T) Sq. Ft./Units: / C.:1 (o .r~ ADT's: lf7 ------ Types of Use: -------Sq. Ft./Units: _____ _ ADT's: ------ FEES REQUIRED: WITHIN CFO: DYES (no bridge & thoroughfare fee in District #1, reduced Traffic Impact Fee) D NO D 1. PARK-IN-LIEU FEE PARK AREA & #: ___ _ FEE/UNIT: ____ _ X NO. UNITS: __ _ D 2. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ADT's/UNITS: __ '-f_1 __ _ X FEE/ADT: ZONE TRANSPORTATION ADT'S Lft .X$10 D 3. BRIDGE AND THOROUGHFARE FEE (DIST. #1 _. _ DIST. #2 ADT's/UNITS:_____ X FEE/ADT: ___ _ D 4. FACILITIES MANAGEMENT FEE ZONE: ___ _ =$~ =$ =$ /03t( OD L-/10.00 DIST. #3 __ ) =$~ UNIT/SO.FT.: ____ _ X FEE/SQ._FT./UNIT: ___ _ =$~ D 5. SEWER FEE PERMIT No. ____ _ EDU's: , J 't X FEE/EDU: / ~5cf BENEFIT AREA: P DRAINAGE BASIN: __ _ =$ ll/L/{c,,J:J-; 7> 3t{. (a 0 ~ EDU's: , 'f '/ X FEE/EDU: / o, D =$ D 6. SEWER LATERAL ($2,500) =$ D 7. DRAINAGE FEES PLDA ___ _ HIGH ___ /LOW __ _ ACRES: _____ _ X FEE/AC: = $ ---::::::::: TOTAL OF ABOVE FEES*: $ , 7<ttf, 1r *NOTE: This calculation sheet is N.OT a complete list of all fees which may be due. Dedications and Improvements may also be required with Building Permits. P:\DOCSIMISFORMS\FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET REV 4/29/99 /J, ti! IS ,11Ah f! .(/VT' ,1 --- . ' ,+lff !ef~f //&lro )( l ... I . . ... ·l~ ~l)lf- I ((q r;<IJ /1-f 0® ~ . 3. q I • • I 1 ,t;~ ~8(5]1\) j. I 3 3-~' 3 .15 . ~ 'I-IR t;t/ ::=-. J,,N& I I '2,,, -~·- .. I PLANNING DEPARTMENT BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST Plan Check No.~?6 Address ?tO(•' -r;;;,,61-1/ ,J/df Planner ~ 7C... Phone (619) 438-1161, extension C{J~ APN: :;?(? "'° ?O ,o / Type of Project & Use: $ /q ofGce Net Project Density: DU/AC Zoning: C-H General Plan: C~ Facilities Management Zone: ___ _ CFO lin/n11tl # __ Date of participation: Remaining net dev acres: Circle One ------- (For non-residential development: Type of land used created by this permit: ____________________ ) Legend: IZI Item Complete Ci2J Item Incomplete -Needs your action D D Environmental Review Required: YES NO TYPE ---- ~DD DATE OF COMPLETION: _____ _ Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: -Discretionary Action Required: YES NO TYPE APPROVAL/RESO. NO. _____ DATE ___ _ PROJECT NO. _______ _ OTHER RELATED CASES: _________________ _ Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: ----------------------- Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance Project site located in Coastal Zone? YES NO CA Coastal Commission Authority? YES NO If California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact them at -3111 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 200, San Diego CA 92108-1725; (619) 521-8036 Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt): Coastal Permit Determination Form already completed? YES NO If NO, complete Coastal Permit Determination Form now. Coastal Permit Determination Log #.: Follo.w-Up Actions: 1) Stamp Building Plans as "Exempt" or "Coastal Permit Required" (at minimum Floor Plans). 2) Complete Coastal Permit Determination Log as needed. ' ,., ,, ',: ···. '~. lnch.isionary Housing Fee required:. YES. · NO · (Effective date bflnclusi9.nar•/Hot:fsing·Ordinance -MfiY 21", 1993.) ': Data· Entrx Gpmpl.eteo? YES __ NO_.·_ _ ._.. .. ·: . (A/P/Ds; Activity:Ma:intena.nce, enter CB#, toolbar, Screems, Rousing Fees, Con~:ruct Rousing Y/N, ·Enter Fee, UPDATE_!)' · · . Site.-·Plan: .' ',lO . o· 1. . .Provide· a .. fully dimeq~ional, site piant!\:kaWli, to sea.le. Show: North qr.row/ pr-o:perty ·ljnes, :easement~; e~is:ting and · proposed structures, streets, exi$ting stre~t improvement$, right-.ot-vvav width, dimensfonal setbacks and exis~Jhg topographical· jlnes . . ~···.DD . I ,oo 2. .Provide legal d~scripti6n .dJ property ,and as.sessor' s parcel number. 2Qning_;· 1. · Setbacks: Front: .ln_terior Side: Street Side: Rear: RfJqi.lired .;._· --~---Showri __ . -------'- . Requited Shown _;._--'-,----'------,----- He quire. d --'----'..;..._---'--'---~ Shown -----..;..,-- Required . Sh.own --'------- Accessory ·stn.1cture setbacks: Fr:oht: Requfred Shown lntetibr Side·: Requir'ed -.....,,_-,---a._..__ '$hown------,-----,- Street Side: · Required · Show_n -,-----'----,- Rear: .Required Shown __ . _____ _ Structur.e separation:. Required Shown --'-----e-- ~ D D ;;J. Lqt Coverilij.e: . Required-,_.......-'---"'---Shown -'---,----- ~-D _ 0: .· 4. Height: Requir~d. _· _________ _ Shown -------"--,--'- D 5. Parking i Space~ .Reqt;1ir:.ed ----'----'-----Shown ------,---- Gu~st Spaces 'Required.'-' -'-----'-..:._..:...-....;.__ Shown ---,-------,-,--,--' o· .Additional Com_ments. ___ -,1--1,4~~~;:=.._g:.;..._l'() __ Vt..;.· __ '7).;....;::e__::::_, ___;,__;,_J~==-· :....IL ...... --~::;_;_/.,....l·--,-;,-· --'- ' . ' ;OK TO ISSUB ANO ENTERED APPROVAL INTO, COMPUlE'R ·-'-'----.t...:::.~u..-- ;,,--, ' ·.~ ~ •I .I . J Carlsbad Fire Department 990136 2560 Orion Way Carlsbad, CA 92008 Fire Prevention (760) 931-2121 Plan Review Requirements Category: Building Plan Reviewed by: Date of Report: 05/19/1999 ------------ Name: SMITH CONSULT ARCH Address: 12220 EL CAMINO REAL STE 200 City, State: SAN DIEGO CA 92130 Plan Checker: Job#: 990136 Job Name: Lucenttitanium Ph 2 CB991270 Job Address: 2101 Faraday Av Ste. or Bldg. No. ~I IZI Approved D Approved Subject to D Incomplete Review FD Job# The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and / or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes and standards. Please review carefully all comments attached as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. The item you have submitted for review has been approved subject to the attached conditions. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. Please resubmit to this office the necessary plans and / or specifications required to indicate compliance with applicable codes and standards. The item you have submitted for review is incomplete. At this time, this office cannot adequately conduct a review to determine compliance with the applicable codes and / or standards. Please review carefully all comments attached. Please resubmit the necessary plans and/ or specifications to this office for review and approval. 1st 990136 2nd FD File# 3rd Other Agency ID Catlsbad Fire Department 990136 2560 Orion Way Carlsbad, CA 92008 Plan Review Requirements Category: Fire Prevention (760) 931-2121 Date of Report: 05/11/1999 Building Plan Reviewed by: ------------ STE 200 City, State: SAN DIEGO CA 92130 Plan Checker: Job #: 990136 ~-----==---...____~==:::::::....,-- Job Name: Lucenttitanium Ph 2 CB991270 ' Job Address: 2101 Faraday Av e. or Bldg. No. D Approved D Approved Subject to IZI Incomplete Review FD Job# The item you have s_ubmitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and / or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes and -standards. Please review carefully all comments attached as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. The item you have submitted for review has been approved subject to the attached conditions. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. Please resubmit to this office the necessary plans and / or specifications required to indicate compliance with applicable codes and standards. The item you have submitted for review is incomplete. At this time, this office cannot adequately conduct a review to determine compliance with the applicable codes and I or standards. Please review carefully all comments attached. Please resubmit the necessary plans and/ or specifications to this office for review and approval. 1st 990136 2nd 3rd FD File# FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 2560 ORION WAY, CARLSBAD, CA 92008-7280 (760) 931-2121 Other Agency ID R-equirements Category: -. ,,, Building Plan Page 1 Requirement: Pending 05.14 Provide Technical Report To determine the acceptability of technologies, processes, products, facilities, materials and uses attending the design, operation or use of a building or premises subject to the inspection of the department, the Chief is authorized to require the owner or the person in possession or control of the building or premises to provide, without charge to the jurisdiction, a technical opinion and report. The opinion and report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer, specialist, laboratory or fire-safety specialty organization acceptable to the Chief and the owner and shall analyze the fire-safety properties of the design, operation or use of the building or premises and the facilities and appurtances situated thereon, to recommend necessary changes. Requirement: Pending 05.32 Additional Requirements or Comments FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 256<:t@,R~WAY, CARLSBAD, CA 92008-7280 (760) 931-2121 . i~ ! __ ,. ' , !"· -•• . ------. PRIME STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS 16980 Via Tazon, Suite 260 San Qiego, California 92127 Tel (619) 487-0311 STRUCTURAL\ CALCULATlONS LUCENT Tl TANIA 99-60 PLAN CHECie CORRECT! ON pc f At>DlT\OtvAL CALS A1 A--A=>'1 G t/t1·/'C?O --------...--------·-___ .., ---·-·· ------·.-------.. -··· j --...__._.,. _ 1 -. _ ,: . ~ i ; ; l 1'. l ~ J.._...t i . - ~ '.CARLSBAD :~er-.: (2'70 · PLAN ·d-lEcki. 1 c6RR~CTl oN ----·· - , T 4~-';; .. 2i~.: SEE-UPDATED. SHEtT S-2. NE.IN WORK HAS &EN CLOUDED. -····--· .. -. -~--·----- 30, ntE .. ·COLUMN Sl~ ON MATc.tlES C-2 ON · S\-lEE-T - PA<tE 3 OF ORlG\NAL CALCULATiDN S-2. . . 32. SEE 1'1/S-1 FOR 11\E DETAIL TH.AT REG.LURES Sf>EC\AL ..,.., ?:), ! N SPEC Tl O t\\ . SPEClAL {1'JSPECTOR FOR T'rilS PROJ"C~T lS SPEC( F!E.D JN S?ECtAL (NSPECTION 1'):JiE =Ft Af SHC::T S-t SE.E l11/s-i FDR ~\ST oF THIS PROJECT. # ADDiTIONAL CALCULATION (S A TTACr1ED ·-· .. ' ---·-V ·! J . s~sp. ~LG l--- J 1.b , .. . ! _J __ :_~-' ________________ _,__ __ --_j-------''.--~~--'-------~--:tO,!Opg !-_ -tv'\:l SC. --4, o · I· . I l· • . 1 I i · , , _ __..______,_~. --.!. ~--. ------ i ' ---------------------------••••••• A __ , .__ 'Pr. P:. t'!4,;* p,.__ p~ p,_ P~ &' t S' l --ry,-t-·$_, --;t- l l + J ~ l l l . t. _; ---· . , ------'46_!..~ ,, ---------·--. FOR T'( p: COWl?l ti ON .. ' Of . D .. AC.T · .P, ~ 3~.4f>lf _-~ l3/1z _, -~---~~-::...~? lbs P:i:.-= ~0,0 (l::s x: Y4· X1 16/22 = lO;,O lbs --r, 'f !'" , ----. ___ f~_:: :=ib. ,/ pi 'f-o/12: -AO O .. -· '"'t"O, I It:,$. -------------- f ____ ------------------------------· L.A'(.OUT ! , i -------·--------------- -----· ----------· USE: ·C 12 ,.._ 3 >< \2 G.A 1 @· I b"O.C . --c------------~---. ---- -----------------·-- \="OR THE MO£T CO!'.J Dl -:-; ON J{\J LY l l 1 I I J l l l l l l l l t i w ,. 33.4 pit )C 1/41 )( 16fi2 l(. ! 3 Dlf \ (/Jp= [O .. 0 ps,::_ Y--16/12 : !3.=2>3p(f 24.46 p!f lA?>E C l2 7 3 ~ /2.(jA @ (!l: "O.C .. { I. • • .. _.~ LUCENT TITANIA . .. ? CEILING JOIST@CLEAN ROOM (TYP. l6"o.c) Overall Length of Beam: 46.5 ft. Axial Load: 0 KIPS 44.5 Mx (Max) Vx (Max) I Required 24.7039 in"4 10 oca1on 22.08 ft 0.00 ft 23.09 ft Deflection Limit: 240.0 44.5 10 Length (ft) 1 46.50 I Load (PLF) . Moment (K-m) Location (ft)7)efr.Fact. (m) : Locatioiilftr 13.3 : 52.568 22.08. -57.4366 ; 23:09; Support Loe. I Moment Reaction (ft) I (K-in) (lbs) -~,----'-~a~.o=o+i -__..,..o.oou--40Ttf4' 2 46.50 i 0.000 389.309 i ----------------------- S7.4366 -:>'f, 35 ::. L4' in::. L 38.2 pt Load 2 3 4 5 6 7 Loe. : (ft) ; .00 i 5.50 I 13.50 1 18.50 25.50 30.50 45.50 Mag. (lbs) 44.51 10.0; 10.0: 48.9, 10.0 10.0 44.5 Moment (K-in) 4.80~ 22.048 I 43.762' 51.547 51.634 46.308 4.592· { \ r , 'LUCENT TITANIA PRIME JOB : "l~ -6c . STRUCTI.,'RAL DATE: 4--qq ! ENGINEERS SHT : AiJ I -~ CEILING JOIST @ CLEAN ROOM -~'l Member. C12-3-12 Manufacturer: Generic 97 Yield= 50.0 KSI Oimensiol'.ls Gross Properties -:Oepth -·-12:uooo m Area = 1.95 m2 Flange = 3.0000 in Ix = 39.35 in4 Lip = 1.0000 in ly = 2.15 in4 Bend = 0.2034 in Rx = 4.49 in t = 0.1017 in Ry = 1.05 in Punch = 1.5000 in Cw = 63.63 in6 Wlip = 0.6949 in Jx10E3 = 6.72 in4 Wflg = 2.3898 in Xo = -1.96 in Wweb = 11.3898 in Ro = 5.01 in Beta = 0.85 BENDING ANALYSIS Eq. C3.1.2-9 Sigt = (GJ + PiA2ECw/LtA2)/ARoA2 = 165. 70 KSI Eq. C3.1.2-8 Sigy = PiA2E/(Ly/Ry)A2 = 139.19 KSI Eq. C3.1.2-5 Me = RoA(Sigt*Sigy)A.5 = 1483.51 K-in Eq. C3.1.2-3 My = Sf*Fy = 327.96 K-in Me> 0.5My Therefore, Mc= My(1 -My/4Me) = 309.831 K-in Find effective section at stress f, f = Mc/Sf = 47.24 KSI Configuration: Single Loads and Bracing Axial: p = 0.00 Kxlx = 48.00 Kyly = 48.00 KtLt = 48.00 Bending: Mx = 52.57 Klx = 48.00 Kly = 48.00 KU = 48.00 eFlange = 2.390 in; eLip = 0.695 in; eWeb = 9.890 in; Sc = 6.553 inA3 Eq. C3.1.2-1 Mn = ScMc/Sf = 309.53 K-in KIPS in in in K-in in in in Eq. C3.1-1 Ma = Mn/1.67 =:. 185.35 K-in With 1/3 stress increase Ma = 247.13 K-in SHEAR ANALYSIS h / t > 1.38 * (5.34 * E / Fy) I\ .5. Therefore Va= .53 * E * 5.34 * t I\ 31 h Va = 7.71 KIPS With 1/3 stress increase= 10.2·8 KIPS { l ;' ' LUCENT TITANIA CEILING JOIST@ CLEAN ROOM ( II 'f'\ C ' IC V. ) Overall Length of Beam: 46.5 ft. Axial Load: O KIPS 0 , Mx (Max) ! Vx (Max) i i I Required 37.5151 in"4 oca1on 23.25 ft 0.00 ft 23.25 ft PRIME JOI!: 'V'.~-6'" "'~ STRUCTURAL CATE: i' +-41 I ~~ ENGINEERS SHT : A-4 I Deflection Limit: 240.0 Span 1 Length (ft) .46.50 Load (PLF) , Moment (K-m) Locafion(ffr--oeff.·Fact.lm) • Location (ftf Support 1 2 24.5 , 79.333 Location (ft) I Moment (K-m} Reaction (lbs} I 0.00 . 0.000 568.695 46.50 ! 0.000 568.695 L = 2.22r,,=-2st 23.25 -8 7.2226 : 23-:ZS:- 11 ,1 0 ' C . SD5' ltr''-f. I \1 { l ~ .• ,,_ .!I , .. :: LUCENT TITANIA · .. -.. ~ - CEILING JOIST@ CLEAN ROOM Member: C12-3-12 Manufacturer: Generic 97 Yield= 50.0 KSI -.. Dimensions. --·Gross Properties --Oepth -. 12.0000-In Area -= 1.95 m2 Flange = 3.0000 in Ix = 39.35 in4 Lip = 1.0000 in ly = 2.15 in4 Bend = 0.2034 in Rx = 4.49 in t = 0.1017 in Ry = 1.05 in Punch = 1.5000 in Cw = 63.63 in6 Wlip = 0.6949 in Jx10E3 = 6.72 in4 Wflg = 2.3898 in Xo = -1.96 in Wweb = 11.3898 in Ro = 5.01 in Beta = 0.85 BENDING ANALYSIS Eq. C3.1.2-9 Sigt = (GJ + Pi"2ECw/Lt"2)/ARo"2 = 165.70 KSI Eq. C3.1.2-8 Sigy = Pi"2E/(Ly/Ry)"2 = 139.19 KSI Eq. C3.1.2-5 Me = RoA(Sigt*Sigy)".5 = 1483.51 K-in Eq. C3.1.2-3 My = Sf*Fy = 327.96 K-in Me> 0.5My Therefore, Mc= My(1 -My/4Me) = 309.831 K-in Find effective section at stress f, f = Mc/Sf = 47.24 KSI Configuration: Single Loads-and Bracing Axial: p = 0.00 KxLx = 48.00 Kyly = 48.00 KtLt = 48.00 Bending: Mx = 79.33 Klx = 48.00 KLy = 48.00 KLt = 48.00 eFlange = 2.390 in; elip = 0.695 in; eWeb = 9.890 in; Sc = 6.553 in"3 Eq. C3.1.2-1 Mn = ScMc/Sf = 309.53 K-in KIPS in in in K-in in in in Eq. C3.1-1 Ma = Mn/1.67 = 185.35 K-in With 1/3 stress increase Ma = 247.13 K-in SHEAR ANALYSIS h / t > 1.38 * (5.34 * E / Fy) " .5. Therefore Va = .53 * E * 5.34 * t" 3 I h Va = 7.71 KIPS With 1/3 stress increase= 10.28 KIPS :bii --~.' . ~ /· ' . -··· -i -. p, r .J, ___,_ ... E _,J. ,~r. ~ ~II 1-... 112!..o'' j 1-\AY... I r11 cu _J_ rl ,I:: .A"-. I '----Ll.../\','\I W:: 5ps-t ,< 24110.C. = 10 pl-f -----·---.. - P~~-?.~ ~ . (~-4J( ¼.: t -~.o ps.f.) 1-49.;;; 2 , .;,< 241 1 o.c. _ : 8S3. ?> tbs USE c ?;E>/8-x i 5/e -;r 20 G,.t:... e 241 ' o.c. CHECK CONTINv\OLlS TRACK -----·----- p t l' Cf ( )((ft.-[ ~ ~ tJ l"E'~'ci::. ~c .. ..) CRlT1CAL COlvD \ Tl o hl 46.51 ::- ---~ 1'2"0.C == 2.. 3(0.4-266 )(2') lb .O.IG )(('2. = 426.G tbs 0,(6 K--ft USE. 31;,/0 7-11/4 r l2 6-A TRACK:: (${~ o.o8'H· in3 ) . . . · z trn ·. · •·· ··: ·,i6,~~~~?f~"'"' .. t • ' ' ·: ·,.;i ·=: ... .-·· LUCENT TITAN1A BEARING WALL @ CLEAN ROOM Overall Length of Beam: 12 ft. Axial Load: .8533 KIPS 0 Mx (Max) Vx (Max) I Required 0.3954 in"4 oca 10n 6.00 ft 0.00 ft 6.00 ft --, A PRIME JOB! 11-0<> 1 : \ !::T::U~TURA!.. DATE: ~ -o2J _· . ·~~ ENGINEERS SHr: A7 Deflection Limit: 360.0 -· sparr--1:efig'tlfTft) ~ --LoacnPLF)-Momerft(K-m) Location(ff)--:-Oefl. Fact. (m), Location {ftf -Support 1 2 f21JO 10.0 2.160 6.0-0 -0.1582 6.0-0- Locafionlft) Moment {K-m) Reaction {lbs) 1 0.00 0.01JO 60.000 12.00 0.000 60.000 ! ------------------------ I ' ·--= . ·. /i . ; J --.· .... ..,..;.,_ ...... ~-.i.-:..,"\.'!~· -: -·--··--:··· ·-·-·-~_,._.,. .. _ ... _ PRIME JOB: '!t/~60 A 1"-ucTI mAI l"\•T\", 4.-0a -"' .:;i" Ii.ii"'""-~•w---,,,• -, LUC-ENT TITANIA . ~ ENGlNEERS SH1 : A8 BEARING WALL@ CLEAN ROOM Member: C358-158-20 Manufacturer: Generic 97 Yield= 33.0 KS! Configuration: Single Dimensions Gross Properties .. --Oepth = 3:6250 m Area = Flange = 1.6250 in Ix = Lip = 0.5000 in ly = Bend = 0.0938 in Rx = t = 0.0346 in Ry = Punch = 1.5000 in Cw = Wlip = 0.3717 in Jx10E3 = Wflg = 1.3683 in Xo = Wweb = 3.3683 in Ro = Beta = AXIAL ANALYSIS Eq. C4.1-1 Fex = Pi"2E/(KLx/Rx)"2 = 29.46 KSI Eq. C4.1-1 Fey = Pi"2E/(KLy/Ry)"2 = 47.69 KSI 0.26 0.55 0.10 1.45 0.61 0.29 0.10 -1.34 2.07 0.58 m2 in4 in4 in in in6 in4 in in Eq. C3.1.2-9 Sigt = (GJ + Pi"2ECw/KLt"2)/ARo"2 = 34.17 KSI . Loads and Bracing Axial: p = 0.85 KxLx = 144.00 KyLy = 48.00 KtLt = 48.00 Bending: Mx = 2.16 KLx = 144.00 KLy = 48.00 KU = 48.00 Eq. C4.2.1 Fet = (Sigt + Fex -((Sigt + Fex)"2 -4Beta*Sigt*Fex)".5/2Beta = 19.17 KSI Fe = 19.17 KSI Fe > Fy/2. Therefore Fn = Fy(1 -Fyi4Fe), Fn = 18.80 KS! Find Ae at stress Fn: eFlange = 1.368 in; elip = 0.372 in; eWeb = 1.365 in; Ae = 0.192 in . Eq. C4-2 Pn = AeFn = 3.61 KIPS KIPS in in in K-in in in in Eq. C4-1 Pa = Pn/1.92 = 1.88 KIPS With 1/3 stress increase Pa = 2.50 KIPS BENDING ANALYSIS Eq. C3.1.2-9 Sigt = (GJ + Pi"2ECw/Lt"2)/ARo"2 = 34.17 KSI Eq. C3.1.2-8 Sigy = Pi"2E/(Ly/Ry)"2 = 47.69 KSI Eq. C3.1.2-5 Me = RoA(Sigt*Sigy)".5 = 21.77 K-in Eq. C3.1.2-3 My = SrFy = 9.97 K-in Me> 0.5My Therefore, Mc= My(1 -My/4Me) = 8.831 K-in Find effective section at stress f, f = Mc/Sf = 29.22 KSI eFlange = 1.329 in; elip = 0.363 in: eWeb = 1.868 in; Sc = 0.292 in"3 Eq. C3.1.2-1 Mn = ScMc/Sf = 8.53 K-in Eq. C3.1-1 Ma = Mn/1.67 = 5.11 K-in With 1/3 stress increase Ma = 6.81 K-in COMBINED AXIAL AND BENDING Eq. C5-5 Per = Pi"2Elx/Lx"2 = 7.69 KIPS Eq. C5-4 Omegax = 1 -1.92P/Pcr = 0.787 Interaction Equations: Eq. C5-1 P/Pa + Mx/MaOmegax = 0.992 Eq. C5-2 P/Pao + Mx/Ma = 0.682 SHEAR ANALYSIS With 1/3 stress increase = 10.26 KIPS With 1/3 stress increase = 0.840 With 1/3 stress increase = 0.718 With 1/3 stress increase = 0.511 h / t > 1.38 * (5.34 * E / Fy) " .5. Therefore Va= .53 * E * 5.34 * t" 3 / h Va = 1.03 KIPS With 1/3 stress increase= 1.37 KIPS ~ s· ··-·------·------~----··----------------- {-I r '' ---·-.t _____________ --~--~---------· -..... -· _,-. -----. . ; . :. :-~:·· ... . --.: ~ -~ . -~----------- (~ .... .GL&i JOJ.tt~ Ar__flM.. ~:#:~az,.~~Z-7 -t 41?;> __ .. _:;•.-,"' _ .tvtk:L1r-11viM ___ £?~--~-1:2,Lo'' _______ _ • ~ _...__.:,,;!<..;._~ ...... #.,.;-_.:: ____ ~ .--. -· ___ :;~_;;; -· ... ,, ___ -:-.,. .. -.·-:t4~.:"~ 4',_;~.--~f·· ..:.• ~--"' :c.. -~ ---· -., -= -·-- . _ -·ves,ib,N Dt-,::,; 10.0 psp y_·p--_ -::;:,. Wp tf - . -·:·,-,.. ·, -)) u~ 10.cps-F -£ ,zJ;:,-2-op!f WY w PJefflv'I f\ll El ff W Ut f A/lt?IJT ::::-;}{) p If r~ ~-llr !A&h CAO xl~t-Yi (16,4 r?WO.~ t • ,:'""'·, ;_ ·-~l . -~ ' . LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES CLG JOISTS AT ROOMS 302,327, & 413 Overall Length of Beam: 22 ft. Axial Load: 0 KIPS 0 I j Mx (Max) I Vx (Max) i I Required 9.7456 in"4 oca1on 11.00 ft 0.00 ft 11.00 ft Deflection Limit 240.0 mtME .08: qq-t ~ smuc1URAL DATE: 4421 ENGINEERS SHI' : ho Span 1 Length (ft) : 22.00 Load (PLF) Moment (K-m) Location (ft}l7Jefl. Fact. (m) Location {ftT 11. oo ; -1ITT2·..,..o-z---__,1...,,,,...,_ o"<>o<-': Support 1 2 60.0 43.560 Location (ft) Moment (K-m) ! Reaction (lbs) 0.00 0.000 660.000 22.00 0.000 ! 660.000 I ' PRIME JOB! 'l'l-6 0 STRUC1URAL DATE; 4--qq ENGINEERS SHf: All LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES CLG JOISTS AT ROOMS 302,327, & 413 Member: C10-158-16 Manufacturer: Generic 97 Yield= 50.0 KSI Configuration: Single ___ _ _ ::_; __ . DjmensiQn$ . -:_ . . .-~ __ . -. ____ _.Gross Pi:operties •. -_ , _ ·y .:.-, : . : : . .Loads ,and Bracing Depth = .10.0.0DO m Area -. 0]8. m2. -Axial: Flange = 1.6250 in Ix = 9.88 in4 p = 0.00 KIPS Lip = 0.5000 in ly = 0.20 in4 Kxlx = 48.00 in Bend = 0.1132 in Rx = 3.56 in KyLy = 48.00 in t = 0.0566 in Ry = 0.51 in Ktlt = 48.00 in Punch = 1.5000 in Cw = 4.15 in6 Bending: Wlip = 0.3302 in Jx10E3 = 0.83 in4 Mx = 43.56 K-in Wflg = 1.2854 in Xo = -0.83 in KLx = 48.00 in Wweb = 9.6604 in Ro = 3.69 in KLy = 48.00 in ~ .. ""' ... Beta = 0.95· KLt = 48.00 in BENDING ANALYSIS Eq. C3.1.2-9 Sigt = (GJ + Pi"2ECw/Lt"2)/ARo"2 = 50.25 KSI Eq. C3.1.2-8 Sigy = Pi112E/(Ly/Ry)112 = 32.69 KSI Eq. C3.1.2-5 Me = RoA(Sigt*Sigy)".5 = 116.66 K-in Eq. C3.1.2-3 My = Sf*Fy = 98.84 K-in Me> 0.5My Therefore, Mc= My(1 -My/4Me) = 77.903 K-in Find effective section at stress f, f = Mc/Sf = 39.41 KSI eFlange = 1.285 in; eLip = 0.330 in; eWeb = 7.730 in; Sc = 1.882 in"3 Eq. C3.1.2-1 Mn = ScMc/Sf = 74.17 K-in Eq. C3.1-1 Ma = Mn/1.67 = 44.41 K-in With 1/3 stress increase Ma = 59.21 K-in SHEAR ANALYSIS h / t > 1.38 * (5.34 * E / Fy) " .5. Therefore Va = .53 * E * 5.34 * t 11 3 / h Va = 1.57 KIPS With 1/3 stress increase= 2.09 KIPS I • . PRIME . . . . JOit: ,,-60 ' ' qQAL POST ~ SUPR:>RT! ~JG-DUCTS ~ co~RU)Of<S STRlJC1UIW. DATE: 4 -Dq · .. --·: ~CB~ o•T 6 .t, );;,, .. ---.· --~-.·· · ... , -" -. ·.·---.,.. : ···--· --. ,_ ·-· ~='-. . ·" ......... ~!!!,&GINE;!:!::!~!ERS!!!. ~---!-c~. ·,t;:-=.A~i~2.::1-;; 0 -. . --.. r< MAX. LOAD OF (S-0 plf V 0 ~ t½; Clo JQ[ST i -r,-pi;~ ARC!-\. I l~.-::....~.,. -:.. ..;·---...:_:. __ ::--.;--.:---~,l-·:.,.-....;~,--= __ ;_ __ : :---~·~:'7=::---_J_. ·--'-;-·-~;_..._ ::.;. .:..~r..-<:~.;..-~--::_.f._,.:_,::·. -.J .. I ~~ I-j l'l~O" 1/) I &.. I I I L - pest ~ '1 [?~6-MAi -~ I -?OST-DE.S:iGN-· rb ~ ( 50 p If -;e ~ )( 8 'o.c. = GOO !\:-s Pt: = z:. r-cf. wr ~ o.4 7 , .o ")( a.ris x 2 x c \s-o,,K ½.){a') = 360 lbs. "-._ CON~RVATlVE ( t N VE.RTE::D ~1.JDClLUM Stt2UCT,: ·\ USE C3o/8 '1 I%?~ (~6-A ( eo?<E-D) SEE. CCM P'JTE R OJTPLl T. · ·oR·~o· -A· ..... I I,.: ..... , '. ' "'_If .. _ S:J.PPORT POST p P: [SOp\f Y-8' >< ½ = Goo !b:s pif/2. JD /~f (l..., 1 • LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES GOALPOST AT 8'-0" O.C. PRIME JOB: &/C/-t,o STRUCTURAL DATE: +4/4 ENGINEERS SHr : 1-. : 3 Overall Length of Beam: 14 ft. Axial Load: .6 KIPS Deflection Limit: 240.0 :._. ___ ;o_~ ____ ·· ... ,-------------------------------.----......J 360 0 Mx (Max) Vx (Max) I Required 1.9682 in"4 oca,on 12.00 ft 12.00 ft 14.00 ft Span Length (ft) . Load (PLF) , Momenf (K-m} . locaflon(ft,Defl. Fact. (m) : locafion(ftf 1 12.00 · 0.0 0.000 0.00 0.3896: 6.93~ Support Loe. I Moment Reaction pt Load Loe. I Mag. Moment (ft) I (K-in) · (lbs) (ft) I (lbs) (K-in) i I I 1 0.00 i 0.000 -60.000 · 1 14.00; 360.0 0.0-01)1 2 12.00 I -8.640 420.000 ! I Right Overhang Deflection Factor: -0.3936 tll .-· ' . l • LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES -. .--·i GOALPOST AT 8'-0" O.C. Member: C358-158-14 Manufacturer: Generic 97 Yield= 50.0 KSI Configuration: Boxed Dimensions .. Gross .Properties loads and :Bracing Depth = 3.6250 m Area = 1.04 in2 Axial: Flange = 1.6250 in Ix = 2.11 in4 p = 0.60 Lip = 0.5000 in ly = 1.60 in4 KxLx = 24.00 Bend = 0.1426 in Rx = 1.42 in KyLy = 24.00 t = 0.0713 in Ry = 1.24 in Ktlt = 24.00 Punch = 1.5000 in Cw = 0.00 in6 Bending: Wlip = 0.2861 in Jx10E3 = 0.00 Wflg = 1.1972 in Xo = 0.00 Wweb = 3.1972 in Ro = 0.00 Beta = 0.00 . AXIAL ANALYSIS Eq. C4.1-1 Fex = Pi"2E/(KLx/Rx)"2 = 1026.21 KSI Eq. C4.1-1 Fey = Pi"2E/(KLy/Ry)"2 = 781.04 KSI Fe = 781.04 KSI in4 in in Fe > Fy/2. Therefore Fn = Fy(1 -Fy/4Fe), Fn = 49.20 KSI Find Ae at stress Fn: Mx = 8.64 KLx = 24.00 KLy = 24.00 Klt = 24.00 eFlange = 1.197 in; elip = 0.286 in; eWeb = 1.562 in; Ae = 0.805 in Eq. C4-2 Pn = AeFn = 39.63 KIPS KIPS in in in K-in in in in .. Eq. C4-1 Pa = Pn/1.92 = 20.64 KIPS With 1/3 stress increase Pa = 27.52 KIPS ·.: BENDING ANALYSIS Find effective section at stress. Fy = 50.00 KSI elip = 0.286 in; eWeb = 1.697 in; Sc = 1.141 in"3 Eq. C3.1.1-1 Mn = SeFy = 58.17 K-in Eq. C3.1-1 Ma = Mn/1.67 = 34.16 K-in With 1/3 stress increase Ma = 45.55 K-in COMBINED AXIAL AND BENDING Eq. C5-5 Per = Pi"2Elx/Lx"2 = 1065.81 KIPS With 1/3 stress increase = 1421.08 KIPS Eq. CS-4 Omegax = 1 -1.92P/Pcr = 0.999 With 1/3 stress increase = 0.999 Interaction Equations: Eq. C5-1 P/Pa + Mx/MaOmegax = 0.282 With 1/3 stress increase = 0.212 Eq. C5-2 P/Pao + Mx/Ma = 0.281 With 1/3 stress increase = 0.211 SHEAR ANALYSIS h / t < 1.38 * (5.34 * E / Fy)" .5. Therefore Va = Min (.38 *t"2(5.34*E/Fy)" .5 , .4 * Fy * h * t) Va = 9.12 KIPS With 1/3 stress increase= 12.16 KIPS · .. , ·_,,. ! · .. ~ . ' ,. ' . LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES HORIZONTAL SUPPORT AT GOALPOST AT 8'-0" O.C. Overall Length of Beam: 17.5 ft. Axial Load: 0 KIPS 2 Mx (Max) Vx (Max) .o..;.._. . . ; . -: .. 600 Deflection Limit: 240.0 PRIME . JOB: qq-6"' f STRUClURAl CATE: 4-"f'I l ENGINEERS SHT : p. 'S 0 ... I Required . 4.0033 jnA4 oca ,on 8.75 ft 2.00 ft 0.00 ft Span I Length (ft) . Load (PLF) Moment (K-m) Location (ft):f)efl. Fact. (m) Location (ftf 1 : 13.50: b.0 24.300 8.75. -1.8015 8.75 -Support Loe. Moment Reaction Pt Load Loe. ' Mag. Moment (ft) I (K-in) (lbs) (ft) I (lbs) (K-in) 1 2.00 I 0.000 300.000 1 1 8.75: 600.0 24.300 2 15.50 I 0.000 300.000 1 I I I Left Overhang Deflection Factor: 0.8007 Right Overhang Deflection Factor: 0.8007 ~---.1 -... ........ • ,,, ______ ,~·--. -.. ---___ ..,..._ ----......:: ... --·=--~ ............. .. ' ' ·-•-.A~-• LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES HORIZONTAL SUPPORT AT GOALPOST AT 8'-0" O.C. Member: C6-3-14 Manufacturer: Generic 97 Yield= 50.0 KSI Configuration: Single .·,-<:-·-,;..,.:.,..Dimensions.-Gr:oss eroperties -. . _ Loads and Bracing -.•. --Oepth = 6.0000 in Area 0.96 m2 Flange = 3.0000 in Ix = 5.57 in4 Lip = 1.0000 in ly = 1.27 in4 Bend = 0.1426 in Rx = 2.41 in t = 0.0713 in Ry = 1.15 in Punch = 1.5000 in Cw = 11.04 in6 Wlip = 0.7861 in Jx1 OE3 = 1.62 in4 Wflg = 2.5722 in Xo = -2.60 in Wweb = 5.5722 in Ro = 3.73 in Beta = 0.51 BENDING ANALYSIS Eq. C3.1.2-9 Sigt = (GJ + PiA2ECw/Lt"2)/ARo"2 = 10.57 KSI Eq. C3.1.2-8 Sigy = Pi"2E/(Ly/Ry)"2 = 14.72 KSI Eq. C3.1.2-5 Me = RoA(Sigt*Sigy)".5 = 44.52 K-in Eq. C3.1.2-3 My = Sf*Fy = 92.85 K-in Me< 0.5My Therefore, Mc= Me = 44.523 K-in Find effective section at stress f, f = Mc/Sf = 23.98 KSI Axial: p = 0.00 Kxlx = 162.00 Kyly = 162.00 Ktlt = 162.00 Bending: Mx = 24.30 Klx = 162.00 Kly = 162.00 KU = 162.00 eFlange = 2.572 in; eLip = 0.786 in; eWeb = 4.072 in; Sc = 1.850 inA3 Eq. C3.1.2-1 Mn = ScMc/Sf = 44.36 K-in KIPS in in in K-in in in in Eq. C3.1-1 Ma = Mn/1.67 = 26.56 K-in With 1/3 stress increase Ma = 35.42 K-in SHEAR ANALYSIS h / t > 1.38 * (5.34 * E / Fy) A .5. Therefore Va= .53 * E * 5.34 * t A 3 / h Va· = 5.43 KIPS With 1/3 stress. increase= 7.24 KIPS • .,.. . . ' -------... .....____ _ ______ ,__ ___ _ .·--_:-!"-~~~~::-;~~---~ -·~--;:\"'-u-..-... -::--~~ . . --.·--..;;.,~~-:, ... _.J-.· ... ..,.-i---·'11· "21.--~-....---.....i... ~-...... ----,: ... ---........ -~ -"""-to.,. ... . C,_~ ___ GaQ~gf 8PANN1Nt4 I.Olo 11 tJ.v ___ -___ _ _ _ _ (/½f_ __ l D/-:rJ.11 __ WJNDtw _____ {? f f:3N 1 ~ 0S) --~------- ----------------.. -----•· --·- ------------·-······ -------------------------. -- .. ~--.-:;:-.,..: ;·;;;;;,,;;'.-q;:-.,t2V..Qr~~~?~ • ...;...i,,,,';',1<,t.:;,,..',,."'"",~-·-·,.,_;,,~-----:;&:...-. -:-.,.,~ ~--:e !:e .. • ·-·--a· .. _-,"-, :. --= • ··· ·;_ .:. · · • -·. • <.-:··-,,, . -~/ Po -::; lG-()pJb-1/ z_)( It?!·~ _1-t:3Q f · P~:::. ZlCf Wp =-t.4x_l:D YO.!SYZ X tf;r:;zJ Y 1/2x/d) ~ 4!60:Jf- .. -•· -..... ,. -· --... . --~ . ----------_: _ -_ -bW:.a?J..IJfvl~-.Ovt:;i:rv.iT --~ ·-· ----. ---------. { I I vT ffJ~'' f?J rvW \A~~ CA1g-x/b/8x !ZGr,4 (&oxr:;r;,) ~ ~rftVllwt vH1rl'l1 C, (f x?J:,c 14 GrA -or--.;_.;.--- . ) LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES GOALPOST AT 10'-0" O.C. Overall Length of Beam: 14 ft. Axial Load: .75 KIPS Deflection Limit: 240.0 450 :--------------------------------,----- 1 o Mx (Max) Vx (Max) I Required 2.4602_ in"4 oca 10n 12.00 ft 12.00 ft 14.00 ft Span : Length (ff) Load (PLF) Moment (K-m) Location (ft)-:-Oefl. Fact. (m) Location{fff 1 12.00 o.o 0.000 o.oo · 0.4870 o-:-s:r- -Support 1 2 Loe. (ft) 0.00 12.00 Moment ' (K-in) 0.000: -10.800 j Reaction (lbs) -75.000 525.000 Pt Load 1 Loe. ' Mag. Moment (ft) \ (lbs) (K-in) 14.00-+;--4~5~0~.o~-~o~.o~o~o· ! ' Right Overhang Deflection Factor: -0.4920 ·':\ .• ,,.--i -_, PRIME x,a: qq-60 l STRUCTI.JRAL OA1E: --;;::q:;r ENGINEERS SHJ : ~~ LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES GOALPOST AT 10'-011 O.C . Member: C358-158-12 Manufacturer: Generic 97 Yield= 50.0 KSI Configuration: Boxed . ~--.... ;: : •· .-: .. Dimensions --.Gr..oss Pr.operties . . Loads and Bracing --.Oepth = 3.6250 m Area = 1.43 m2 --Axial: Flange = 1.6250 in Ix = 2.81 in4 p = 0.75 Lip = 0.5000 in ly = 2.19 in4 Kxlx = 24.00 Bend = 0.2034 in Rx = 1.40 in Kyly = 24.00 t = 0.1017 in Ry = 1.24 in Ktlt = 24.00 Punch = 1.5000 in Cw = 0.00 in6 Bending: Wlip = 0.1949 in Jx10E3 = 0.00 Wflg = 1.0148 in Xo = 0.00 Wweb = 3.0148 in Ro = 0.00 Beta = 0.00 --------- AXIAL ANALYSIS Eq. C4.1-1 Fex = Pi"2E/(Klx/Rx)"2 = 993.53 KSI Eq. C4.1-1 Fey = Pi"2E/(Kly/Ry)"2 = 773.92 KSI Fe = 773.92 KSI in4 in in Fe > Fy/2. Therefore Fn = Fy(1 -Fy/4Fe), Fn = 49.19. KSI Find-Ae at stress Fn: Mx = 10.80 Klx = 24.00 Kly = 24.00 Klt = 24.00 eFlange = 1.015 in; elip = 0.195 in; eWeb = 1.515 in; Ae = 1.125 in Eq. C4-2· Pn = AeFn = 55.34 KIPS KIPS in in in K-in in in in Eq. C4-1 Pa = Pn/1.92 = 28.82 KIPS With 1/3 stress increase Pa = 38.43 KIPS BENDING ANALYSIS Find effective section at stress Fy = 50.00 KSI elip = o: 195 in; eWeb = 1.515 in; Sc = 1.519 in"3 Eq. C3.1.1-1 Mn = SeFy = 77.54 K-in Eq. C3.1-1 Ma = Mn/1.67 = 45.49 K-in With 1/3 stress. increase Ma = 60.65 K-in COMBINED AXIAL AND BENDING Eq. C5-5 Per = Pi"2Elx/Lx"2 = 1420.83 KIPS With 1/3-stress increase = 1894.44 KIPS Eq. C5-4 Omegax = 1 -1.92P/Pcr = 0.999 With 1/3 stress increase = 0.999 Interaction Equations: Eq. C5-1 P/Pa + Mx/MaOmegax = 0.264 With 1/3 stress increase = 0.198 Eq. C5-2 P/Pao + Mx/Ma = 0.263 With 1/3 stress increase = 0.197 SHEAR ANALYSIS h / t < 1.38 * (5.34 * E / Fy)" .5. Therefore Va= Min (.38 *t"2(5.34*E/Fy)" .5 , .4 * Fy * h * t) Va = 12.26 KIPS With 1/3 stress increase= 16.35 KIPS I • • -~:__.l PRIME JOB: "'f4-G-o ; STRUCTURAL. DATE: .±..i'L: ENGINEERS SHT: A-.2.1 i LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES HORIZONTAL SUPPORT AT GOALPOST AT 10'-0" O.C. Member: C6-3-16 Manufacturer: Generic 97 Yield = 50.0 KSI _ :Dimensions . ...;:,..,._ -~" Gross Properties .. _ --Oepth = 6.0000 In Area 0.77 m2 Flange = 3.0000 in Ix = 4.50 in4 Lip = 1.0000 in ly = 1.03 in4 Bend = 0.1132 in Rx = 2.42 in t = 0.0566 in Ry = 1.16 in Punch = 1.5000 in Cw = 9.00 in6 Wlip = 0.8302 in Jx10E3 = 0.82 in4 Wflg = 2.6604 in Xo = -2.61 in Wweb = 5.6604 in Ro = 3.75 in Beta = 0.51 BENDING ANALYSIS Eq. C3.1.2-9 Sigt = (GJ + Pi112ECw/Lt112)/AR0112 = 16.20 KSI Eq. C3.1.2-8 Sigy = Pi112E/(Ly/Ry)A2 = 24. 71 KSI Eq. C3.1.2-5 Me = RoA(Sigt*Sigy)A.5 = 57.41 K-in Eq. C3.1.2-3 My = Sf"Fy = 74.97 K-in Me> 0.5My Therefore, Mc= My(1 -My/4Me) = 50.495 K-in Find effective section at stress f, f = Mc/Sf = 33.68 KSI Configuration: Single Loads .and Bracing Axial: p = 0.00 KxLx = 126.00 KyLy = 126.00 Ktlt = 126.00 Bending: Mx = 23.63 KLx = 126.00 Kly = 126.00 KLt = 126.00 eFlange = 2.217 in; eLip = 0. 769 in; eWeb = 4.160 in; Sc = 1.355 in113 Eq. C3.1.2-1 Mn = ScMc/Sf = 45.64 K-in KIPS in in in K-in in in in Eq. C3.1-1 Ma = Mn/1.67 = 27.33 K-in With 1/3 stress. increase Ma = 36.44 K-in SHEAR ANALYSIS h / t > 1.38 * (5.34 * E / Fy) 11 .5. Therefore Va= .53 * E * 5.34 * t 11 3 / h Va = 2.67 KIPS With 1/3 stress increase= 3.57 KIPS . . l-~-flRIME J08: .fl::€~J STRUCllJRAL DA'IE: 33!:j ENGINEERS SHr ~ A.22. I -~ . --·-_..,_:..~-.-_: -.; : .. •. ,;. -. .• r~. • -_... 4-.:.,,.,,c_.,:..¾,...-_ .. _,. .',;"•·.:;· ·----·-.,. • ' ·-.· -· -~ ~ •• -•• ,_.. --~-··-;_.; --.:~ _;_., --' -• ~ --:0. • -------· .,t .... _.. • ,::_ ~ .. ~-..;~....:,_. _, ---. ---------------- . ---·-·-·-·----·.1..-. ·---:--. - J t vJ::. -4cll # x 12/,u :. 004.Gplf {~) "t-MAK n:~ac.ti ~1 ~C-12@ ll::,11t'.C, JA1J18 P~-SI &r ~ w ==-~ ps.0 1 ' =-fy lt- p ..---C.. -.,, ' /I _/ A.Y"l ,L :::--l?F-TX 2--){~ ~ sv==rr-- = 0-J pl+- ~?;1 pl+- I 11, ~ \,kt, .... fJJJ1pthg'!z ~ 1~4:- f ~-(A.L,rJ?UJ 1,, .. [1-;tjJg X /~[yZ/) 6tA { otxtiD) tS'' . ·-----==--------~ .:..,.,r,•_ '. ---":'---,.;.-: ·-._ .. -.-~----•,: • -• -·:--: . . -.. ·-.,.._----~-·----···------~--. -----· ..... _ ·-----------·--- ' , ,, . ,. ,,. ~ r LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES HEADER AT CLEAN ROOM Overall Length of Beam: 8 ft. Axial Load: O KIPS 0 Mx (Max) Vx (Max) I Required 2.6320 jnA4 oca1on 4.00 ft 0.00 ft 4.00 ft Deflection Limit: 240.0 PRIME .a: qa-l o STRUCTURAL DAlE: 4-:fi ENGINEERS SHr : A.:.~ , Span , Length (ft) Load (PLF) Moment (K-m) Location (ft)~efl. Fact. (m): Location (ft) · 1 a.oo 337.o 32.352. 4.0U -1.0528: 4.oo· :Support 1 2 Location (ft) , Moment (K-m) Reaction (lbs) 0.00 ' 0.000 1348.000 8.00: 0.000 1348.000 I • .. -;?) ~-... ...: • "'. j;l r . ' LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES HEADER AT CLEAN ROOM .. . .~ .. Member: C6-158-16 Manufacturer: Generic 97 -. ·~ •: .• ... · . . Yield = 33.0 KSI PRfME X>B: qe;--£0 STRUClURAI.. CATE: 4--4''1 ENGINEERS SHT : A:t+ Configuration: Boxed Dimensions .. -Gross Properties Loads .and Bracing Depth . = . 6.0000 m Area = 1.11 in2 Axial: Flange = 1.6250 in Ix = 5.67 in4 p = 0.00 KIPS Lip = 0.5000 in ly = 1.99 in4 Kxlx = 24.00 in Bend = 0.1132 in Rx = 2.26 in Kyly = 24.00 in t = 0.0566 in Ry = 1.34 in KtLt = 24.00 in Punch = 1.5000 in Cw = 0.00 in6 Bending: Wlip = 0.3302 in Jx10E3 = 0.00 in4 Mx = 32.35 K-in Wflg = 1.2854 in Xo = 0.00 in Klx = 24.00 in Wweb = 5.6604 in Ro = 0.00 in Kly = 24.00 in Beta = 0.00 KLt = 24.00 in BEN DIN~ ANALYSIS Find effective section at stress Fy = 33.00 KSI eLip = 0.330 in; eWeb = 4.160 in; Sc = 1.880 in"3 Eq. C3.1.1-1 Mn = SeFy = 62.39 K-in With 1/3 stress. increase Ma = 49.52 K-in Eq.C3.1-1 Ma= Mn/1.67 = 37.14 K-in SHEAR ANALYSIS h / t > 1.38 * (5.34 * E / Fy)" .5. Therefore Va= .53 * E * 5.34 * t" 3 / h Va = 5.35 KIPS With 1/3 stress increase= 7.13 KIPS , J. ) . :/';._ ' LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES JAMB STUD AT HEADER AT CLEAN ROOM Overall Length of Beam: 12 ft. Axial Load: 1.348 KIPS 0 Mx (Max) Vx (Max) I Required 0.2521 in"'4 oca 10n 8.00 ft 12.00 ft 6.26 ft .. " ~ ' Deflection Limit: 240.0 40 : Span Length (ft) Load (PLF) ; Moment (K-m) 1 Locafion(ftf7)efl. Fact. (m) location (ft) I 2.00 5.0, 2.240, 8.00 •0,1513 6.20 rsupport Loe. Moment Reaction ' Pt Load Loe. Mag. Moment (ft) (K-in) (lbs) (ft) i (lbs) (K-in) 1 0.00 0.000 43.333 1 8.00 · 40.0 2.240- 2 12.00 0.000 56.667 . ' -·-·--------·-----·~-·"'·. ) . LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES JAMB STUD AT HEADER AT CLEAN ROOM Member: C358-158-20 Manufacturer: Generic 97 Yield= 33.0 KSI PRfME JOB: 'IC/-bo 1 STRUClURAL OA:E: 4-f{] ENGINEERS SHT : A2.l-, I Configuration: Boxed _____ . ___ .Dimensions-__ Gr:oss.Pr.oper:ties. --.Loads.and.Br.acing-----· Depth = 3.6250 m Area = 0.52 m2 Axial: Flange = 1.6250 in Ix = 1.10 in4 p Lip = 0.5000 in ly = 0.82 in4 Kxlx Bend = 0.0938 in Rx = 1.45 in KyLy t = 0.0346 in Ry = 1.25 in Ktlt Punch = 1.5000 in Cw = 0.00 in6 Bending: Wlip = 0.3717 in Jx10E3 = 0.00 Wflg = 1.3683 in Xo = 0.00 Wweb = 3.3683 in Ro = 0.00 Beta· = -· 0.00 AXIAL ANALYSIS Eq. C4.1-1 Fex = Pi"2E/(KLx/Rx)"2 = 4242.37 KSI Eq. C4.1-1 Fey = Pi"2E/(KLy/Ry)"2 = 3161.47 KSI Fe = 3161.47 KSI in4 in in Fe > Fy/2. Therefore Fn = Fy(1 -Fy/4Fe), Fn = 32.91 , KSI Find Ae at stress Fn: Mx Klx Kly KU = 1.35 = 12.00 = 12.00 = 12.00 = 2.24 = 12.00 = 12.00 = 12.00 eFlange = 1.268 in; elip = 0.310 in; eWeb = 1.095 in; Ae = 0.343 in Eq. C4-2 Pn = AeFn = 11.27 KIPS KIPS in in in K-in in in in Eq. C4-1 Pa = Pn/1.92 = 5.87 KIPS With 1/3 stress increase Pa = 7.83 KIPS BENDING ANALYSIS Find effective section at stress Fy = 33.00 KSI eLip = 0.310 in; eWeb = 1.868 in; Sc = 0.563 in"3 Eq. C3.1.1-1 Mn = SeFy = 19.95 K-in Eq. C3.1-1 Ma = Mn/1.67 = 11.12 K-in With 1/3 stress increase Ma = 14.82 K-in COMBINED AXIAL AND BENDING Eq. C5-5 Per = Pi"2Elx/Lx"2 = 2215.18 KIPS With 1/3 stress increase = 2953.57 KIPS Eq. C5-4 Omegax = 1 -1.92P/Pcr = 0.999 With 1/3 stress increase = 0.999 Interaction Equations: Eq. C5-1 P/Pa + Mx/MaOmegax = 0.431 With 1/3 stress increase = 0.323 Eq. C5-2 P/Pao + Mx/Ma = 0.430 With 1/3 stress increase = 0.323 SHEAR ANALYSIS h / t > 1.38 * (5.34 * E / Fy)" .5. Therefore Va= .53 * E * 5.34 * t" 3 / h Va = 2.05 KIPS With 1/3 stress increase= 2.74 KIPS I ' ', • l !; . ··--......... 1. ~ ): • ' -~---,--------~---· ·----- -~---"4~ --:::-t~ .... i:~ ..... ~-,:-; :·~ ; ;-:.... -·-----· . · ··---.:.. ~~-:-·-=----· .· · -·-l '/_ .. ~--.i :tJ ... 1YP1lkl,,~ kr Wffll?P/C __ . ----~-~-~-=-~------------ ~ tl,,U1PU1 --__ -_{Mk¼ _~fkN .~. JQlr;_!~J--------·---·· · i-Cltx/Gfgy)t~A- ·., .. .r·l ___ . -----~--7»iJiii2)~.·~- t¼ NAU... Wo~ fOtsh !~1/i _ -t 8psf-x 4 1 .=: ~1-f lfl Wi,~ IOfSh 1-?::>'/z ~ {l~plf /lftl-p{-f JAM@ t2~1~N._ p Ml.kt.-.::-/(_p Zplh ID 1/z_; 8 / O =JI: -w~ 6 sh1 1 ~ lo l-f---·----. p ---p -. --------- ----· -/l --·r----r1 -------·· --.. p ~ f:3psnc 2 X IO /2-~ J:50 :/f- \ Yb -·- 2'a"-Vu.1fU1 t -C 06/gy f <;:ft V 2b Gt A {-6DtWJ . " -_____ , ___ ---~--·~--.::---· --. -·---. -..:.:;. •. ~-----~· ,,,h_ ...... _ .... LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES TYPICAL HEADER Overall Length of Beam: 10 ft. Axial Load: O KIPS 0 Mx (Max) Vx (Max) I Required 2.4712 in"4 oca,on 5.00 ft 0.00 ft 5.00 ft Deflection Limit: 240.0 -Span Length (ft) , Load (PLF) Moment (K-m) Location (ffJ,l)efl. Fact. (m) Location (ftf 1 10.00 162.0 24.300 5.00· -1.2356 5.00 Support , Location (ft) Moment (K-m), Reaction (lbs): 1 0.00 0.000: 810.000. 2 10.00 0.000 '. 810.000: l " _ .,...-• .,...., .... ~Vr~_ ... _ ... ...,._ - LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES TYPICAL HEADER Member: C6-158-18 Manufacturer: Generic 97 Yield= 33.0 KSI ( 'c' f ' Configuration: Boxed Dimensions GrQ_~$ PJOJ!§!Jtie$ .Lo.ads_an,d Bracing .. ·----___ ·---- Depth = 6.0000 in Area = 0.89 m2 Axial: Flange = 1.6250 in Ix = 4.59 in4 p = 0.00 KIPS Lip = 0.5000 in ly = 1.60 in4 Kxlx = 24.00 in Bend = 0.0938 in Rx = 2.27 in KyLy = 24.00 in t = 0.0450 in Ry = 1.34 in KtLt = 24.00 in Punch = 1.5000 in Cw = 0.00 in6 Bending: Wlip = 0.3612 in Jx10E3 = 0.00 in4 Mx = 24.30 K-in Wflg = 1.3475 in Xo = 0.00 in KLx = 24.00 in Wweb = 5.7225 in Ro = 0.00 in KLy = 24.00 in Beta = 0.00 KLt = 24.00 in BENDING ANALYSIS Find effective section at stress Fy = 33.00 KSI elip = 0.361 in; eWeb = 4.222 in; Sc = 1.522 in"3 Eq. C3, 1.1-1 Mn = SeFy = 50.50 K-in Eq. C3.1-1 Ma = Mn/1.67 = 30.07 K-in With 1/3 stress increase Ma = 40.09 K-in SHEAR ANALYSIS h / t > 1.38 * (5.34 * E / Fy)" .5. Therefore Va= .53 * E * 5.34 * t" 3 / h Va = 2.66 KIPS With 1/3 stress increase= 3.55 KIPS • r ,.,:.7.,, ·/·,·_'.:,.i LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES JAMB STUD AT HEADER . - _-.... -~ ........... -.:::."-~::.,=,.Jc.·-.... -• ..,----,,_ •• -• PRIME J08 ~ 'f'f-6-o 1 STRUClURAL DATE: +::ti · ENGINEERS SHT : A-s>-~ 1. Overall Length of Beam: 12 ft. Axial Load: .81 KIPS Deflection Limit: 240.0 I . . -,· lo Mx (Max) Vx (Max) I Required 8 5 oca1on 8.00 ft 12.00 ft 6.29 ft 1 so Span i Length (ft) Load (PLF). Moment (K-m), Location (ftf7)efr.Fact. (m) Locaflorilfff 1 ' 12.00 5.0: 2.560 8.00 -0:IB94 6.29 ~upport 1 2 Loe. (ft) 0.00 12.00 Moment · (K-in) 0.000 · 0.000; Reaction · (lbs) 46.667 63.333 Pt Load Loe. · Mag. Moment 1 (ft) : (lbs} 1 (K-in) s. ou-'-; ----.-s·o"" ....... 0---2""" . .;,....56"""0..- , . , LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES JAMB STUD AT HEADER Member: C358-158-20 Manufacturer: Generic 97 Yield= 33.0 KSI Configuration: Boxed Dimensions Gf.Q§_s Prqp~rtjes Loads __ and._Bracing ________________ -Oepth 3.6250 In Area = 0.52 m2 Axial: Flange = 1.6250 in Ix = 1.10 in4 p Lip = 0.5000 in ly = 0.82 in4 KxLx Bend = 0.0938 in Rx = 1.45 in Kyly t = 0.0346 in Ry = 1.25 in Ktlt Punch = 1.5000 in Cw = 0.00 in6 Bending: Wlip = 0.3717 in Jx10E3 = 0.00 Wflg = 1.3683 in Xo = 0.00 Wweb = 3.3683 in Ro = 0.00 Beta = 0.00 AXIAL ANALYSIS Eq. C4.1-1 Fex = Pi"2E/(KLx/Rx)A2 = 4242.37 KSI Eq. C4.1-1 Fey = Pi"2E/(KLy/Ry)"2 = 3161.47 KS! Fe = 3161.47 KSI in4 in in Fe > Fy/2. Therefore Fn = Fy(1 -Fy/4Fe), Fn = 32.91. KSI Find Ae at stress Fn: Mx KLx KLy KLt = 0.81 = 12.00 = 12.00 = 12.00 = 2.56 = 12.00 = 12.00 = 12.00 eFlange = 1.268 in; eLip = 0.310 in; eWeb = 1.095· in; Ae = 0.343 in Eq. C4-2 Pn = AeFn = 11.27 KIPS KIPS in in in K-in in in in -0··_-:-., Eq. C4-1 Pa = Pn/1.92-= 5.87 KIPS With 1/3 stress increase Pa = 7.83 KIPS BENDING ANALYSIS Find effective section at stress Fy = 33.00 KSI eLip = 0.31 O in; eWeb = 1.868 in; Sc = 0.563 in"3 Eq. C3.1.1-1 Mn = SeFy = 19.95· K-in Eq.C3.1-1 Ma= Mn/1.67 = 11.12 K-in With1/3stress.increaseMa = 14.82 K-in COMBINED AXIAL AND BENDING Eq. C5-5 Per = Pi"2Elx/Lx"2 = 2215.18 KIPS With 1/3 stress increase = 2953.57 KIPS Eq. C5-4 Omegax = 1 -1.92P/Pcr = 0.999 With 1/3 stress increase = 0.999 Interaction Equations: Eq. C5-1 P/Pa + Mx/MaOmegax = 0.368 With 1/3 stress increase = 0.276 Eq. C5-2 P/Pao + Mx/Ma = 0.368 With 1/3 stress increase = 0.276 SHEAR ANALYSIS h / t > 1.38 * (5.34 * E / Fy) " .5. Therefore Va= .53 ~ E * 5.34 * t" 31 h Va = 2.05 KIPS With 1/3 stress increase= 2.74 KIPS ~~-----~-·--·-- · · , -. _ _ _ ----~~::_ _ ---~------~~ WI -• ._j•. _.,.;_"\~~T-~~-':_;-..<.">~',; ... ~."t~..:-~•""1.,i,i.-4<,v'•;-..;_ • ,.,:;. .. ·--~~~~..,_--;._,-,:,~:~:=,--=_~..,_:i~~::.--=.~.;.::._.'~: ~-=-~,.._:..;::...·.+---~-~:~ . ...__.-;:_• --.:.":_,,._ :~--=~f-,..,_.,._.~,.--, ":;\ :.· .. ~:~; ·-----~------------------. - 6~ 1YP. ~~ vJJ AfJD'Lr C.l/4 LON) AT AWACENT ~M (&Wit=-J',o") . Mk>[ __ t-P~ A:J: =tJ!iC~_ f1~M L:Ab -----~: ~rtf;:~~7f~~2~fi1J;f !f~4'= 1qTp/T/;ii:Fpt-f-c ~- 1,-u(J Y /t6'/tY/h GiA -t/::_ - _)A;wiR;;> S 11AD Pfr-LtA't,,::: ·0eflJplf-y K')i=-14-uD-lf w~~p1f P::. 4of --.. \ LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES HEADER AT FILM LAB Ove~II Length of Beam: 8 ft. Axial Load: 0 KIPS 0 Mx (Max) , Vx (Max) I Required 2.7336 in"4 oca1on 4.00 ft 0.00 ft 4.00 ft Deflection Limit: 240.0 Span Length (ft) ; Load (PLF) Moment (K-m) Location (ft) Deft. Fact. (m) Location (tt)- 1 8.00 350.0 33-:000 '. 4.00 -1.0934 4.00 ---Support I Location (ff) Moment (K-m); ReactTofillcsr 1 i 0.00 0.000 i 1400.000 2 8.00 0.000 i 1400.000 --~ LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES HEADER AT FILM LAB :,,. Member: CS-158-16 Manufacturer: Generic 97 Yield= 50.0 KSI Configuration: Boxed _ .Dimensions-Gross Pr(?perties Loads and Bracing Depth = 6.0000 m Area = 1.11 m2 Axial: Flange = 1.6250 in Ix = 5.67 in4 p = 0.00 Lip = 0.5000 in ly = 1.99 in4 Kxlx = 24.00 Bend = 0.1132 in Rx = 2.26 in Kyly = 24.00 t = 0.0566 in Ry = 1.34 in Ktlt = 24.00 Punch = 1.5000 in Cw = 0.00 in6 Bending_: Wlip = 0.3302 in Jx10E3 = 0.00 in4 Mx = 33.60 Wflg = 1.2854 in Xo = 0.00 in Klx = 24.00 Wweb = 5.6604 in Ro = 0.00 in Kly = 24.00 .Beta = 0.00 KU = 24.00 BENDING ANALYSIS Find effective section at stress. Fy = 50.00 KSI elip = 0.213 in; eWeb = 4.160 in; Sc = 1.828 inA3 Eq. C3.1.1-1 Mn = SeFy = 94.53 K-in KIPS in in in K-in in in in Eq. C3.1-1 Ma = Mn/1.67 = 54.73 K-in With 1/3 stress increase Ma = 72.97 K-in SHEAR ANALYSIS h / t > 1.38 * {5·.34 * E / Fy) A .5. Therefore Va = .53 * E * 5.34 * t A 3 / h Va = 5.35 KIPS With 1/3 stress increase= 7.13 KIPS PRIME JOB : f'l-Go SJRUCl\JRAL OAlE: 4:'tl_ ENGINEERS SHr : A.3.s-I LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES JAMB STUD AT HEADER BY FILM LAB Overall Length of Beam: 12 ft. Axial Load: 1.4 KIPS Deflection Limit: 240.0 0 Mx (Max) Vx (Max) I Required 0.2521 jnA4 ocaIon 8.00 ft 12.00 ft 6.26 ft 40 Span Length (ff) Load (PLF) : Moment (K-m) Locafioilltt) Defl. Fact. {m) Location (ftf 2.00 5.0 I 2.240 8.00 -0.1513 6.20 ---Support Loe. Moment Reaction ; Pt Load Loe. Mag. Moment (ft) (K-in) (lbs> I (ft) (lbs) (K-in) 1 0.00 0.000 43.333 ! 1 8.00 40.0 · T.240- 2 12.00 0.000 56.667 j -~ i.:'..-: : __ -1 . ' PRIME X)8 ! '¥t-6o STRUCTURAL DATE: 4:::fi ENGINEERS SHI' : A¾. LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES JAMB STUD AT HEADER BY FILM LAB Member: C358-158-20 Manufacturer: Generic 97 Yield= 33.0 KSI Configuration: Boxed Dimensions Gross Properties-Loads and Bracing '"Depth = 3.6250 ,n Area = 0.52 m2 Axial: Flange = 1.6250 in Ix = 1.10 in4 p = 1.40 Lip = 0.5000 in ly = 0.82 in4 KxLx = 12.00 Bend = 0.0938 in Rx = 1.45 in KyLy = 12.00 t = 0.0346 in Ry = 1.25 in KtLt = 12.00 . Punch = 1.5000 in Cw = 0.00 in6 Bending: Wlip = 0.3717 in Jx10E3 = 0.00 Wflg = 1.3683 in Xo = 0.00 Wweb = 3.3683 in Ro = 0.00 Beta· = 0,00 AXIAL ANALYSIS Eq. C4.1-1 Fex = Pi112E/(KLx/Rx)A2 = 4242.37 KSI Eq. C4.1-1 Fey = Pi"2E/(KLy/Ry)A2 = 3161.47 KSI Fe = 3161.47 KSI in4 in in Fe > Fy/2. Therefore Fn = Fy(1 -Fy/4Fe), Fn = 32.91 · KSI Find Ae at stress Fn: Mx = 2.24 KLx = 12.00 KLy = 12.00 KLt = 12.00 eFlange = 1.268 in; elip = 0.310 in; eWeb = 1.095 in; Ae = 0.343 in Eq. C4-2 Pn = AeFn = 11.27 KIPS KIPS in in in K-in in in in Eq. C4-1 Pa = Pn/1.92 = 5.87 KIPS With 1/3 stress increase Pa· = 7.83 KIPS BENDING ANALYSIS Find effective section at stress Fy = 33.00 KSI elip = 0.310 in; eWeb = 1.868 in; Sc = 0.563 in"3 Eq. C3.1.1-1 Mn = SeFy = 19.95 K-in Eq. C3.1-1 Ma = Mn/1.67 = 11.12 K-in With 1/3·stress increase Ma = 14.82 K-in COMBINED AXIAL AND BENDING . Eq. C5-5 Per = Pi112Elx/Lx112 = 2215.18 KIPS With 1/3 stress increase = 2953.57 KIPS Eq. C5-4 Omegax = 1 -1.92P/Pcr = 0.999 With 1/3 stress increase = 0.999 Interaction Equations: Eq. C5-1 P/Pa + Mx/MaOmegax = 0.440 With 1/3 stress-increase = 0.330 Eq. C5-2 P/Pao + Mx/Ma = 0.439 With 1/3 stress increase = 0.329 SHEAR ANALYSIS hit> 1.38*(5.34"E/Fy)11 .5. ThereforeVa= .53*E*5.34*t 11 3/h Va = 2.05 KIPS With 1/3 stress increase= 2.74 KIPS ,,. ' t 1 I : 1 l i ·-' • :. ' -v:. -r .. J: ; :. ,· . """'~-.e ' . JOI! 'f(-6::6:i;l -~--! -: ':L · -'1---f . 1 nwvw;; --=zr;:r-- " 't ~ ,-,,, ... , :, . ---·-··-· -·-· I • ! • ";• .-,-. 0 ' • • ' .. -smuc::ruR,61. 0,6.le 4 : ~ -i 'i _ , . ENGINEERS H : A~7 . . 'l'--!, --.--.-----------' ' -----·--. t i"-_ -1 ~ T _ l l 4 : • • L-· -i -:_ ~ -7 --• I· : • .l : ~ . . 1 .. --, .. j · i-: ----·--··---------· ·• - -~~-MA¾._ wAO. ~-~t92~~ __ 4-efj f-L£. Mk/ POINT~ 14/7V~ ((i-l-}0Wee_ JAMb JTIAD) 't~vtS ~-' !· ·:.:. ,1,/:, 14-00 -IP :::-~g,g ft'l' < t {ft._,; 11-',r ~ If 1~ 1~ 1--- 1- I- I I I I I I I I I I I I I ; .'· .. ': ·~ --: . 1:: .. " . ... . ·. PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION, CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER, LOT 43 CARLSBAD, -CALIFORNIA FOR THE BLACKMORE COMPANY 12626 HIGH BLUFF DRIVE, SUITE 440 SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92130 W.O. 1819-SC APR_IL 10, 1995 '--," ~ . : ' '. ,: ~-:', < . j,· ~~::,-z--~-~-.;~ ·,-.-.,,.-----.----------+-:. ______ ,., ·· . .., /. ',·--, ·:. : .• ::_.-,_,·._, ' •, •. ', ',·...... .i.r.1,._,._,:~-~~,·~-....... ~-...~~·: -~ '·~ : . ",' . -. ~ '. •;:·.' . ' '. ,_., , . ',. ,._ " ' ; ~ ...... ',, '• . Geotechnical • Geologic • Environmental I I ,I I I I I. ) I .I I I .I _, I I I -1 I PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION, CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER, LOT 43 CARLSBAD, ,CALIFORNIA FOR _THE BLACKMORE COMPANY 12626 HIGH BLUFF DRIVE, SUITE 440 SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92130 W.0., 1819-SC APRIL 10, 1995 I I .I I I I I I I ~1, I I I I I .I I I I TABLE OF CONTENTS SITE DESCRIPTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Site Conditions and Proposed Development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 FIELD EXPLORATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Seismic Refraction Profiles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 EARTH MATERIALS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Artificial Fill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Bedrock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 SUBSURFACE WATER ..................... ·............................ 4 FAUL TING AND REGIONAL SEISMICITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Other Hazards Considered . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 LABORATORY TESTING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 . Laboratory Standard Relative Maximum Dry Density . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Expansion Potential . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Direct Shear Tests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Resistance ("R") Value Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 CONCLUSIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 RECOMMENDATIONS-EARTHWORK CONSTRUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Grading . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 General ............ ~ .............. ·. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Site Preparation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Rock Hardness and Rippability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Removals (unsuitable materials) ·. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Over-Excavation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Fill Placement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Earthwork Balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Exterior Slab On Grade Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Pavement Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Erosion Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Recommendations for Concrete ''Tilt-up" Structures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Bearing Value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 O Lateral Pressure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Foundation Settlement -Structural Loads . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Design of Floor Slab . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 GeoSoils, Inc. I I I I I I I 1· I I. I I I ,, I I I I I Table of Contents (continued} Retaining Walls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 General ..................................................... 13 Restrained Walls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Cantilevered Walls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Wall Backfill and Drainage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Retaining Wall Footing Transitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 PRELIMINARY PAVEMENT DESIGN ....................................... 15 Subgrade and Base Preparation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 Pavement Construction and Maintenance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 CONCRETE FLA TWORK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 Flatwork Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Landscape Maintenance and Planting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Additional Grading . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 Footing Trench Excavation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 Trenching . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 Drainage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 Utility Trench Backfill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 PLAN REVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 ~ LIMITATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 GeoSoils, Inc. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Geotechnical • Geologic • Environmental 5741 Palmer Way • Carlsbad, California 92008 • (760) 438-3155 • FAX (760) 931-0915 April 10, 1995 W.O. 1819-SC THE BLACKMORE COMPANY 12626 High Bluff Drive, Suite 440 San Diego, California 92130 Attention: Subject: Gentlemen: Mr. Allen Blackmore Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation, Carlsbad Research Center, Lot 43 Carlsbad, California In accordance with your request, GeoSoils, Inc. (GSI) has performed a geotechnical evaluation regarding proposed construction on Lot 43 within the Carlsbad Research Center. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the nature of earth materials underlying the site and to provide preliminary recommendations for site preparation, earthwork construction, and foundation design/construction, based on our findings. SITE DESCRIPTION Site Conditions and Proposed Development The subject site is a roughly rectangular shaped lot bounded by Faraday Avenue on the north, Rutherford Road on the west, an adjacent undeveloped industrial pad on the south, and a developed industrial/commercial lot on the east. Lot 43 comprises approximately 4 acres. A landscaped slope, approximately 6 feet in height, descends from the eastern lot boundary to the pad. Minor slopes (3± feet or less in height) occur around the remaining property boundaries, primarily related to existing landscaped areas adjacentto Faraday Avenue and Rutherford Road. Lot 43 has previously been graded in 1982. According to an as-graded geotechnical report reviewed (San Diego Soils Engineering, 1982), the lot is a cut pad in what was mapped as Point Loma Formation. A temporary desilting basin/storm drain inlet is located toward the northwestern comer of the site. Existing site surface drainage appears to be directed to this basin primarily by means of sheet flow. Localized variations in this grade exist. At the time of our study, most of the interior areas of the site exposed limited fills less than 1 foot in thickness, probably the result of site discing or weed control. Perimeter site areas adjacent to Rutherford Road and Faraday Avenue are landscaped, and probably underlain by minor fills. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I NORTH -------21 l l~:Ft" Zr.t4f!Pf.. JSOUX:Dcr ' ! APPROXIMATE SCALE 1u=2,400 1 FROM THOMAS BROS. GUIDE, 1994 EDITION ., •.. , ...... -·, GeoSoi1.~, lne. FORM 89/22 DATE 3/95 .... /. / .. -------. ------ ;.,,. ... -----··------7"'' f . i I -~ l -·, er ' , ' \ \ \ './ '\ \\ l i .... 1 CARLSBAD ---. __ _.._r-------... _ SITE LOCATION MAP W. O. NO 1819-SD ,,,,--; . / . i" ! Geotechnical Engineering • Engineering Geology FIGURE 1 I I ... I I I I --- 1 I I I I I I I I I THE BLACKMORE COMPANY W.O. 1819-SC APRIL 10, 1995 PAGE 2 Lot 43 was sheet graded at an approximate grade of 2%, resulting in a fall of approximately 9± feet from southeast to northwest. Other than the storm drain basin previously described, other site improvements include the landscaping of perimeter slopes and related street (i.e., sidewalks, streetlights, etc.) improvements . It is our understanding that the proposed development is to consist of the construction of a one story, 64,000± square feet, concrete tilt-up industrial/commercial building with an interior mezzanine, truck ramps and loading areas. The remainder of the lot would be utilized for parking, concrete flatwork, and/or landscape improvements. Typical cut and fill grading techniques are anticipated to construct the building pad to the desired graded configuration. Maximum fill depths are anticipated to be on the order of 4 feet, assuming a level building pad is desired. Proposed onsite cut and/or fill slopes are not anticipated to exceed five feet in height, at gradients of 2:1 (horizontal to vertical) or flatter. Based upon likely finish pad grade elevation(s), a cut/fill transition is anticipated to be created in the central portion of the proposed structure's foot-print. Earthwork quantities will likely balance due to the relatively low volume of earthwork anticipated (approximately 5000 yards). FIELD.EXPLORATION Subsurface conditions were explored for this study by excavating six hand_ auger borings, ranging in depth from 0.5 to 2± feet (practical refusal). A Log of the test excavations is included with this report in Appendix I. Field exploration was performed on March 14, 1995, by our project geologist, who logged the excavations and obtained samples of representative materials for laboratory testing. The approximate locations of the borings are indicated on the enclosed Geotechnical Map (Plate 1 ), which uses a 1 "=30' scale topographic survey prepared by O'Malley and Associates as a base. Seismic Refraction Profiles Rock hardness was evaluated with 2 shallow seismic refraction profiles within the proposed truck bay area and along a future utility alignment onsite. Seismic profiles were determined from 100 foot long seismic lines placed at specific locations as indicated on Plate 1. An EG & G Geometrics ES-1225, · 12 channel seismograph system was used to measure the travel time from the energy source to each geophone located at specific spacings along the seismic line. For this site a sledge hammer striking a metal plate was used as an energy source. Energy sources were located at both ends of the seismic line. Upon completion of field studies, reduction and analysis of the data was performed. It should be noted that seismic profiles are specific to the location of the seismic line and variations should be expected at other locations. GeoSoils, lne. I I I I -- 1 I I I -I I I I I I I I I I I THE BLACKMORE COMPANY W.O. 1819-SC Results of the refraction profiles are presented in the following Table: I RES UL TS OF REFRACTION PROFILES I l:;~~:i=mt1~.~I.!.QMHi~~:ii:i~1U:@~=1m~~id:i:i~1j,rt?ti::@itl SL-1 W-.E (storm drain) SL-1 E-.W (storm drain) SL-2 S....N (dock) SL-2 N....S (dock) 0-4 4-13 13+ 0-2.4 24-8.6 8.6-15.1 15.1+ 0-2.7 2.7-8.8 8.8+ 0-1.3 1.3-6.7 6.7+ 1111 3125 6250 1111 3076 4167 5194 1000 3125 5000 937 2500 5000 <1>AJ1 depths reported are below existing grade. APRIL 10, 1995 PAGE 3 Velocity information may be compared to ripping performance, such as in the table below, to estimate excavation difficulty. Excavation Method Seismic Velocity (Feet per second-fps) Easy Processing ................................................ up to 3,000 Moderately Difficult Ripping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,000 to 4,500 Difficult Ripping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,500 to 5,000 Very Difficult Ripping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,000 to 5,500 Probable Drill and Shoot . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Greater than 5,500 The table above assumes a single shank D9H or equivalent equipment. Difficult ripping represents the start of difficulty in achieving and maintaining ripper shank penetration; the start of "riding out". Classifications are a generalized means of indicated relative excavation effort. The Caterpillar Performance Handbook, Edition 9; October, 1978; typically uses higher velocities for estimating ripper performance; however, it has been our experience that most contractors use 5,000 feet per second (fps) for estimating the upper limit of rippable material. GeoSoils, lne. I I I I I I I I I .. I I I I I I I I I I THE BLACKMORE COMPANY W.O. 1819-SC EARTH MATERIALS APRIL 10, 1995 PAGE4 Earth materials encountered on the site consist of artificial fill, and sedimentary bedrock previously identified as belonging to the Cretaceous age Point Loma Formation (San Diego Soils Engineering, Inc., 1982). Artificial Fill (map symbol at) Artificial fill encountered across the site, generally less than 0.5± feet thick, consists of olive gray brown to yellow brown mottled silty clay and fine sandy clay. These materials were typically wet and soft within the upper 0.5± foot (i.e., overlying bedrock), where encountered. Thicker fills are believed to exist in the landscaped areas at the northern and western perimeters of the site, but are generally outside currently proposed structural improvements and were not explored for this study. Surficial fill encountered across the site (not mapped), was soft and relatively loose. This fill is not suitable for structural support in its present condition. It may, however, be used as compacted fill if it is properly processed (i.e., cleaned, moisture conditioned and compacted). Bedrock (map symbol Kpl} Point Loma formational materials encountered consist of light to medium olive gray, silty claystone to clayey siltstone. Surficial bedrock materials were typically damp to moist, and stiff to hard. While bedding orientations were not observed du.ring this study, undulatory to a gentle southwest regional dip was noted in the area during previous site work performed by others (San Diego Soils Engineering, Inc., 1982), and published geologic maps reviewed (Weber, -1982). Underlying the sedimentary Point Loma Formation in this general area is the Jurassic Age Santiago Peak Volcanic rock. This bedrock unit generally consists of very hard and dense volcanic and metavolcanic rock. This rock unit was not encountered within the exploration performed for this study. Based on upon our review of the preliminary report (San Diego Soils Engineering, Inc., 1982) for this development, this hard rock unit should not be encountered during earthwork/construction on Lot 43. Local variations in the elevation of this hard rock surface (beneath the Point Loma Formation) do occur, however, and although not anticipated, could be encountered. SUBSURFACE WATER Subsurface water was encountered within Lot 43 during field work performed in preparation of the current site evaluation. This water is believed to be the result of recent heavy rains, as the water was observed to be "perched" on relatively undisturbed bedrock underlying random portions of the site. The groundwater encountered is not anticipated to significantly adversely affect site development, provided that the recommendations contained in this report are incorporated into final design and construction. These observations reflect site conditions at the time of our investigation and do not preclude future changes in local groundwater conditions from excessive irrigation, precipitation, or that were not obvious, at the time of our investigation. GeoSoils, lne. --1 I I I ·-I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I THE BLACKMORE COMPANY W.O. 1819-SC FAULTING AND REGIONAL SEISMICITY APRIL 10, 1995 PAGES No known active or potentially active faults are shown crossing the site on published maps (Jennings, 1992) reviewed. No evidence for active or potentially active faulting was encountered in any of our exploratory borings performed during this evaluation or in referenced reports reviewed for this study. There are a number of faults in the southern California area which are considered active and will have an effect on the site in the form of moderate to strong ground shaking, should they be the source of an earthquake. These include, but are not limited to: the San Andreas Fault, the San Jacinto Fault, the Elsinore Fault, the Coronado Bank Fault Zone and the Rose Canyon Fault Zone. The approximate location of these and other major faults relative to the site are indicated on Figure 2. The possibility of ground acceleration, or shaking, at the site may be considered as approximately similar to the southern California region as a whole. The acceleration-attenuation relations of Campbell (1993) have been incorporated into EQFAUL T (Blake, 1991). EQFAULT is a computer program used for the deterministic evaluation of horizontal accelerations from digitized California faults. Results of the computer file search and computations are enclosed in Appendix IL Based upon the acceleration-attenuation relations of Campbell (1993), the largest probable and credible peak horizontal ground accelerations anticipated at the site would be 0.20g and 0.36g assuming maximum probable and credible events of magnitude 6.0 and 7.0, respectively, on the Rose Canyon Fault zone, located as close as 6± miles west of the site. Other Hazards Considered The following list includes other seismic related hazards that have been considered during our evaluation of the site. The hazards listed are considered negligible and/or completely mitigated as a result of site location, soil characteristics and typical site development procedures: • Surface Fault Rupture • Ground Lurching or Shallow Ground Rupture • Tsunamis • Liquefaction • Dynamic settlements It is important to keep in perspective that in the event of a maximum probable or credible earthquake occurring on any of the nearby major faults, strong ground shaking would occur in the subject site's general area. Potential damage to any structure(s) would likely be greatest from the vibrations and impelling force caused by the inertia of a structure's mass, than from those induced by the hazards considered above. This potential would be no greater than that for other existing structures and improvements in the immediate vicinity. GeoSoils, lne. I I I I I I .. I I I I I I I I I I I I I 12. 0 0 c:::. ~+ "C:::::::o -Santa Roso is"--'"' Sonr:i Cruz b ,20· .K 1 Sct>Ta ~ Catciina ~ Is. 119• 50 ,oo .... 5C . 100 l!()Affl Modified after Friedman and Others, 1976 ne• 11• :36" L---+· 35• FAULT MAP ~---3.3· Gulf of caut OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DATE March, 1995 w.o. NO 1819-SC FORM 89/22 Geotechnical • Geologic • Environmental FIGURE 2 -- 1 -- 1 I -·- I I I I I I -·-I I I I I I I I I I THE BLACKMORE COMPANY W.O. 1819-SC General LABORATORY TESTING APRIL 10, 1995 PAGE 6 Laboratory tests were performed on representative samples of the onsite earth materials encountered in order to evaluate their physical characteristics. The test procedures used and results obtained are presented below. Laboratory Standard Relative Maximum Dry Density To determine the compaction characteristics of representative samples of onsite soil, laboratory testing was performed in general accordance with ASTM Test Method D-1557. Maximum dry densities of 104.5 and 103.5 pounds per cubic foot (pcf), with optimum moisture contents of 21.0 and 22.0 percent respectively were determined for samples collected from a depth of 0-1 feet in boring 8-2 and 1-1.5 feet in 8-4. Expansion Potential Expansion index testing was performed on representative samples of soils currently exposed near pad grade, in general accordance with Standard 18-2 of the Uniform Building Code. Expansion indices of 78 (medium) and 46 (low) were recorded for these representative samples of fill and bedrock materials collected onsite. Direct Shear Tests Direct shear strength parameter testing was performed on representative natural and remolded samples of site soil in general accordance with ASTM Test Method D-3080. Test results are included in this report as Plates SH-1 and SH-2.in Appendix Ill. Resistance ("R") Value Test A representative sample of near surface soil was collected from near boring 8-4 for resistance ("R") Value testing. The resistance "R"-value was evaluated in general accordance with the California materials method 301 for these anticipated subgrade soils. These samples were prepared and tested for exudation pressure and "R"-value on each one. Results of this testing is included in Appendix 111, at the back of this report. Based on this result, preliminary pavement design section(s) are provided in a later section of this report. CONCLUSIONS Based on our reviews, field exploration, laboratory testing and geotechnical engineering evaluations it is our opinion that the site appears suitable for the proposed development from a geotechnical engineering and geologic viewpoint, provided that the recommendations presented in the following sections are incorporated into the design and a representative from our office present during construction phases of site development. The primary geotechnical concerns with respect to the proposed development are: • Depth to competent material/bedrock. • Expansion potential and erosiveness of site soils. • Potential for creating a cut-fill transition below the proposed building structure. GeoSoils, lne. -- 1 I I I I I --1 I I -- 1 I I I I I I 1- 1 I. THE BLACKMORE COMPANY W.O. 1819-SC • Regional seismic activity. • Drainage of excavations into bedrock materials. APRIL 10, 1995 PAGE 7 The recommendations presented herein consider these, as well as other aspects of the site. The engineering analyses performed concerning site preparation and the recommendations presented herein, have been completed using the information provided and obtained during our field work. In the event that any significant changes are made to proposed site development, or when final graded configuration of the lot is determined, the conclusions and recommendations contained in this report shall not be considered valid unless the changes are reviewed and the recommendations of this report verified or modified in writing by this office. Grading General: RECOMMENDATIONS-EARTHWORK CONSTRUCTION All grading should conform to the guidelines presented in Appendix Chapter A33 of the Uniform Building Code, the requirements of the City of Carlsbad, and the Grading Guidelines presented in the back of this report (Appendix IV), except where specifically superseded in the text of this report. Prior to grading GeoSoils, Inc. 's representative should be present at the preconstruction meeting to provide additional grading guidelines, if needed, and review the earthwork schedule. During earthwork construction all site preparation and the general grading procedures of the contractor should be observed and the fill selectively tested by a representative(s) of GeoSoils, Inc. If unusual or unexpected conditions are exposed in the field, they should be reviewed by this office and if warranted, modified and/or additional recommendations will be offered. All applicable requirements of local and national construction and general industry safety orders, the Occupational Safety and Health Act, and the Construction Safety Act should be met. Site Preparation: Debris, vegetation and other deleterious material should be removed from the improvement(s) area prior to the start of construction. Areas approved to receive fill should first be scarified and moisture conditioned (at or above the soils optimum moisture content) to a depth of 12 inches and compacted to a minimum 90% relative compaction. Rock Hardness and Rippability Dense sedimentary bedrock appears to be present at or near existing grade over the entire site. Results of our seismic refraction profiles indicate that zones requiring easy processing to moderately difficult ripping would be encountered to depths of 7-9 feet below existing grades in the vicinity of the truck bays, and 7-13 feet along the approximate alignment evaluated for deeper utilities. Materiais requiring very difficult ripping and/or rock-breakers to excavate may be encountered below the depths indicated above. GeoSoils, Inc. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I. THE BLACKMORE COMPANY W.O. 1819-SC APRIL 10, 1995 PAGES It should be noted that weathering of natural earth materials is rather irregular by nature, so hard and soft zones are likely to be encountered. Therefore, it should be anticipated that isolated "hard spots", may be encountered randomly, and may require rock breakers to remove. Removals (unsuitable materials): .. Due to the locally saturated, and overall condition of soils across the entire lot,. both parking/building areas (see boring logs), these soils should be removed to competent material. Removal depths are anticipated to vary from 1-2 feet, locally depending on the degree of earth material saturation and existing fill depth. Once these materials are removed, they may be used as compacted fill provided the materials are moisture conditioned prior to placement. When removals are completed, the exposed surface should be scarified, moisture conditioned and recompacted prior to fill placement. Over-Excavation: Proposed grading of the building site will likely create a cut/fill transition in the building pad area. In order to provide for uniform support of this structure(s), the cut portion of the building area should be overexcavated and replaced with compacted fill to provide a minimum 4 foot thick compacted fill blanket. Areas where planned fills are less than 4 feet thick should also be overexcavated to provide the recommended minimum fill thickness. Overexcavations should be completed to a minimum lateral distance of 8 feet outside of the extreme exterior foundation elements. Over-excavated bottoms should be scarified, moisture conditioned and compacted prior to placement of compacted fill. Fill Placement: Subsequent to ground preparation, onsite soils may be placed in thin (6± inch) lifts, cleaned of vegetation and debris, brought to a least optimum moisture content, and compacted to achieve a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent. If fill materials are imported to the site, the proposed import fill should be submitted to GeoSoils, Inc., so laboratory testing can be performed to verify that the intended import material is compatible with onsite material. At least 3 business days of lead time should be allowed by builders or contractors for proposed import submittals. This lead time will allow for particle size analysis, specific gravity, relative compaction, expansion testing and blended import/native characteristics as deemed necessary. Earthwork Balance The volume change of excavated materials upon compaction as engineered fill is anticipated to vary wit material type and location. However, the overall earthwork shrinkage and bulking may be approximated by using the following parameters: Existing artificial fills . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0% to 5% shrinkage Bedrock (if encountered) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0% to 5% bulking It should be noted that the above factors are estimates only, based on preliminary data obtained. Final earthwork balance factors may vary. GeoSoils, lne. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I THE BLACKMORE COMPANY W.O. 1819-SC APRIL 10, 1995 PAGE 9 Exterior Slab On Grade Areas (Excluding Pavements and Parking Areas) Subgrade soils in proposed slab-on-grade areas should be cleared of all vegetation and other deleterious debris, scarified and moisture conditioned to a depth of approximately 12 inches below existing grades and compacted to a minimum 90% relative compaction as determined by the laboratory maximum dry density. Locally, deeper removal/reprocessing area(s) may be encountered. Pavement Areas A discussion of the treatment of existing ground in pavement areas is presented in the "Preliminary Pavement Design" section of this report. Erosion Control Onsite soils and bedrock materials have a high to moderate erosion potential. Use of hay bales, silt fences, and/or sandbags should be considered, as appropriate. Temporary grades should be constructed to drain at 1-2% to a suitable temporary or permanent outlet. Evaluation of cuts during grading will be necessary in order to identify any areas of loose or non-cohesive materials. Should any significant zones be encountered during earthwork construction remedial grading may be recommended; however no remedial measures are anticipated at this time. FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS Recommendations for Concrete "Tilt-up" Structures For preliminary planning purposes, the following is presented. It is our understanding that the structure will be erected utilizing a tilt-up and steel frame method of construction. We assume that column loads are not anticipated to exceed 50 kips for dead plus live loading conditions while wall loads are not expected to exceed 3 kips per lineal foot. The engineering analysis performed concerning the foundation system and the recommendations offered below, have been prepared using these anticipated loads and assuming the recommended earthwork is performed. In the event that the information concerning the proposed development is not correct, or any changes in the design, location or loading conditions of the proposed structure are made, the conclusions and recommendations contained in this report shall not be considered valid unless the changes are reviewed and conclusions of this report are modified or approved in writing by this office. The information and recommendations presented in this section are not meant to supersede design by the project structural engineer. Upon request, GSI could provide additional input/consultation regarding soil parameters, as related to foundation system design. Design Our field work and laboratory testing indicates that onsite soils are low to medium in expansion potential. Preliminary recommendations for foundation design and construction are presented below. It is currently anticipated that each foundation element for the building will either be entirely in fill or bedrock. Recommendations for building footings that transition from fill to bedrock could be provided, as needed, when the foundation plan is provided. GeoSoils, lne. - I I I I I -I I I I I - I I I I I I I I I THE BLACKMORE COMPANY W.O. 1819-SC APRIL 10, 1995 PAGE10 Bearing Value: Compacted Fill (New) 1 a. An allowable vertical bearing value of 2000 pounds per square foot (psf) should be used for design of continuous footings a minimum 15 inches wide and 18 inches deep and for design of isolated pad footings 24 inches wide and 24 inches deep, bearing in pr9perly compacted fill material. This value may be increased by 200 pounds per square foot for each additional 12 inches in depth (no increase is allowed for footing width) to a maximum value of 2500 pounds per square foot. The above values may be increased by one-third when considering short duration seismic or wind loads. Prepared Bedrock 1 b. An allowable vertical bearing value of 3000 pounds per square foot should be used for design of continuous footings a minimum 15 inches wide and 18 inches deep and for design of isolated pad footings 24 inches wide and 24 inches deep, bearing in properly compacted fill material. This value may be increased by 300 pounds per square foot for each additional 12 inches in depth (no increase is allowed for footing width) to a maximum value of 3500 pounds per square foot. The above values may be increased by one-third when considering short duration seismic or wind loads. 2. All footings should be embedded a minimum 18 inches into properly compacted fill or bedrock. 3. 4. 5. 6. All continuous footings should be minimally reinforced with 4 No. 5 rebars, 2 top and 2 bottom. Interior columns should be supported on isolated column footings or integrated footing and grade beam systems. Column loads should not be supported directly by slabs. The interior mezzanine should not be supported directly upon the slab surface. It is recommended that the interior mezzanine is supported by either isolated interior footings or strip footings. The upper 6 ir-iches of footing embedment should be neglected if not confined by slabs or pavement. Lateral Pressure: Compacted Fill (New) 1 a. Passive earth pressure of compacted fill may be computed as an equivalent fluid having a density of 225 pounds per cubic foot per foot of depth, to a maximum earth pressure of 2000 pounds per square foot. GeoSoils, Inc. I I I I I I I I ·-I I I I I I I I I I I THE BLACKMORE COMPANY W.O. 1819-SC Prepared Bedrock APRIL 10, 1995 PAGE11 1 b. Passive earth pressure of compacted fill may be computed as an equivalent fluid having a density of 275 pounds per cubic foot per foot of depth, to a maximum earth pressure of 3000 pounds per square foot. 2. An allowable coefficient of friction between properly compacted fill soil or prepared bedrock and concrete of 0.35 may be used with the dead load forces. 3. When combining passive pressure and frictional resistance, the passive pressure component should be reduced by one-third. 4. All footings should maintain a minimum 7 foot horizontal set back from the base of the footing to any descending slope. As is measured from the footing face at the bearing elevation. 5. A factor of safety of 1.5 was incorporated into the value of passive earth pressure and the coefficient of friction. 6. The upper 6 inches of passive pressure should be neglected if not confined by slabs or pavement. Foundation footings should be minimally reinforced with four No. 5 bars, two top and two bottom (in the cross-sections). Footings should be: a) tied with a grade beam or tie beams orb) have continuous footings across large openings, (i.e., garages or entrances). All exterior isolated footings should be tied in at least two perpendicular directions by grade beams or tie beams to reduce the potential for lateral drift or differential distortion. The base of the grade beams should enter the adjoining footings at the same depth as the footings (i.e., in profile view). The grade beam steel should be continuous at the footing connection. Grade beams and footings should be minimally reinforced and sized per the structural engineers recommendations. When reviewing the interior building footings, the structural engineer should consider utilizing grade beams to control lateral drift of isolated column footings, if the combination of friction and passive earth pressure will not be sufficient to resist lateral forces. Prior to placing steel or concrete the footing and grade beam excavations should be well moistened. Foundation Settlement -Structural Loads: Provided that the recommendations contained in this report are incorporated into final design and construction phase of development, a majority (50 percent or more) of the anticipated foundation settlement is expected to occur during construction. Maximum settlement is not expected to exceed approximately 1 inch and should occur below the heaviest loaded columns. Differential settlement is not expected to exceed approximately 1 /2 inch between similar elements, in a 20 foot span. Settlement evaluations should be reviewed by this office when the foundation geometry and building loads are known. GeoSoils, lne. I I I I I I - I -- 1 -I I I I I I I I I I I THE BLACKMORE COMPANY W.O. 1819-SC Design of Floor Slab: APRIL 10, 1995 PAGE12 Concrete slab on grade construction is anticipated. The following criteria are considered minimum design parameters for the non-structural slab and they are in no way intended to supersede design by the structural engineer. They do not account for concentrated loads from storage racks, fork lifts or other machinery. The slabs in areas which will receive relatively light loads (office space, lunch area, etc.) should be a minimum of 5 inches thick and be minimally reinforced with No. 3 reinforcing bars on 18 inches centers both ways or equivalent reinforcement. Reinforcing should be properly supported by chairs or blocks to ensure placement near the vertical midpoint of the slab. "Hooking" of reinforcement is not a recommended method of positioning of steel. In areas where moisture condensation is undesirable, (e.g., areas to have floor coverings, office space, machinery, etc.) a minimum 10 mil plastic membrane should be placed. The membrane should be placed in the center of a four inch minimum sand layer. These areas should be separate from areas not similarly protected. This separation should be provided with a concrete cutoff wall extending at least 12 inches into the subgrade soil. Subgrade soils should be at or above (100% to 110%) the soils optimum moisture content to a depth of 18 inches prior to pouring concrete. Presaturation should be verified by this office within 48 hours of pouring concrete. To protect presaturation surfaces from drying the placement of a plastic membrane could be applied to the ground surface. The project structural engineer should design the slabs in warehouse or other areas subject to higher loads. If requested, we will aid the structural engineer with the design of the slab. Modulus of subgrade reaction (k) may be used in the design of the floor slab supporting heavy truck traffic, fork lifts, machine foundations or heavy storage areas (in excess of 100 pounds per square foot, psf). Based on an R-value of 25, determined for site soils and the interrelationships published by the Portland Cement Association for "R"-Value (resistance value) vs Modulus of Subgrade Reaction, an approximate k-value (modulus of subgrade reaction) of 75 pounds per square inch per inch (pci) was estimated. The subgrade should be compacted to a minimum 90 percent of the laboratory maximum density at or above optimum moisture content. Based on our experience in this area, a loaded hard tire forklift or warehouse storage aisle frames may impose the controlling load c0nditions for industrial slabs within a warehouse. If the interior slab is to support either ovens or freezers, additional recommendations should be provided. The project structural engineer should consider the use of transverse and longitudinal control joints to help control slab cracking due to concrete shrinkage or expansion. Two of the best ways to control this movement are: 1) add a sufficient amount of reinforcing steel to increase the tensile strength of the slab; and 2) provide an adequate amount of control and/or expansion joints of accommodate anticipated concrete shrinkage and expansion. Shrinkage cracks could become excessive if proper finishing and curing practices are not followed. Finishing and curing practices should be performed per the Portland Cement Association Guidelines. Mix design should incorporate rate of curing for climate and time of year, sulfate content of soils, corrosion potential of soils, and fertilizers used on site. · GeoSoils, lne. I I I I, I I. I I I I' I I I I I I I I I THE BLACKMORE COMPANY W.O. 1819-SC Retaining Walls General: APRIL 10, 1995 PAGE13 The equivalent fluid pressure parameters provided assume that low expansive granular backfill is utilized behind the proposed walls. The low expansive granular backfill, should be provided behind the wall at a 1: 1 projection from the heal of the foundation system. Low expansive fill is Class 3 aggregate baserock or Class 2 permeable rock. Wall backfilling should be performed with lightly loaded equipment within the same 1 :1 projection (i.e., hand tampers, walk behind compactors). Foundation systems for any proposed retaining walls should be designed in accordance with the recommendations presented in the Foundation Design section of this report. Building walls, below grade, should be water-proofed or damp-proofed, depending on the degree of moisture protection desired. All walls should be properly designed in accordance with the recommendations presented below. If highly expansive soils are used to backfill the proposed walls, increased active and at-rest earth pressures will need to be utilized for retaining wall design. These have been provided for the onsite soils under both restrained and cantilever walls. Some movement .of the walls constructed should be anticipated as soil strength parameters are mobilized. This movement could cause some cracking depending upon the materials used to construct the wall. To mitigate this effect the use of vertical crack control joints and expansion joints, spaced at 20 feet or less along the walls should be employed. Vertical expansion control joints should be infilled with a flexible grout. Wall footings should be keyed or doweled across vertical expansion joints. Restrained Walls: Loading Dock Wall It is recommended that loading dock walls be designed for restrained conditions (indicated below), where adjacent to the proposed site building. Loading dock walls should be designed to resist lateral earth pressure and any additional lateral pressures caused by surcharge loads on the anticipated adjoining slab surface. Approximately 1 /3 to 1/2 of surcharge loads on the truck loading dock slab amy be added as a uniform load in the back of the loading dock wall. However, the structural engineer or civil engineering specializing in structural design should be responsible for the evaluation of the type of wall connection and the condition of the wall (restrained or cantilever). Other Walls Any retaining walls that will be restrained prior to placing and compacting backfill material or that have re-entrant or male comers, should be designed for an at-rest equivalent fluid pressures (EFP) of 65 pcf, plus any applicable surcharge loading. This restrained-wall, earth pressure value is for select backfill material only. For walls that are restrained and backfilled with native low to medium expansive soils, an EFP of 75 pcf, plus applicable surcharge loads should be used. For areas of male or re-entrant comers, the restrained GeoSoils, lne. I I· I I I I ·I I I I I I I I I I I' I I THE BLACKMORE COMPANY W.O. 1819-SC APRIL 10, 1995 PAGE 14 wall design should extend a minimum distance of twice the height of the wall laterally from the corner. Building walls below grade or greater than 2 feet in height should be water-proofed or damp-proofed, depeooing on the degree of moisture protection desired. The wall should be drained as indicated in the following section. A seismic increment of 15H (uniform pressure) should be used on walls for level backfill and 25H for sloping backfill of 2:1. Where H is defined as the height of retained material behind the wall may be used. Cantilevered Walls: These recommendations are for cantilevered retaining walls up to 10 feet high. Active earth pressure may be used for retaining wall design, provided the top of the wall is not restrained from minor deflections. An empirical equivalent fluid pressure approach may be used to compute the horizontal pressure against the wall. Appropriate fluid unit weights are provided for specific slope gradients of the retained material. These do not include other superimposed loading conditions such as traffic, structures, seismic events or adverse geologic conditions. For cantilever retaining walls greater than 4 feet in height, a seismic increment of 15H (uniform pressure) for level backfill and 25H for backfiD-sloped at 2: 1 ~eh ind the walls. If traffic is within a distance H behind any wall or a 1: 1 projection from the heel of the wall foundation a pressure of 100 psf per foot in the upper 5 feet should be used. Structural loads from adjacent properties and their influence on site walls should be reviewed by the structural engineer, if within a 1 :1 projection behind any site wall. Level 2 to _1 35 55 50 65 *To be-increased by traffic structural surcharge and seismic loading as needed. These pressures are for retained onsite soils which are derived as indicted below. Wall Backfill and Drainage: All retaining walls should be provided with an adequate backdrain and outlet system (a minimum 2 outlets per wall), to prevent buildup of hydrostatic pressures and be designed in accordance with minimum standards presented herein. Gravel used in the backdrain systems should be a minimum of 1 cubic foot per lineal foot of 3/8 to 1 1/2 inch clean crushed rock wrapped in filter fabric (Mirafi 140 or equivalent) and 12 inches thick behind the wall. The surface of the backfill should be sealed by pavement or the top 18 inches compacted to 90% relative compaction with GeoSoils, lne. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I THE BLACKMORE COMPANY W.O. 1819-SC APRIL 10, 1995 PAGE15 native soil. Proper surface drainage should also be provided. Weeping of the walls in lieu of a backdrain is not recommended. A paved drainage channel (v-ditch or substitute), either concrete or asphaltic concrete behind the top of the walls with sloping backfill should be considered to reduce the potential for surface water penetration. For level backfill, the grade should be sloped such that drainage is toward a suitable outlet at 1-2 percent. The surface drainage on this site will be along the bedrock/fill contact toward the lowest point of bedrock surface (excavation or natural). This is anticipated to be at the truck loading dock area (approximately 6 to 10 feet below the finished grade). In addition to the storm drain a subsurface drain behind the truck loading dock wall is recommended. This may be drained into the storm drain or a suitable surface or subsurface outlet. Retaining Wall Footing Transitions Site walls are anticipated to be founded on footings designed in accordance with the recommendations in this report. Wall footings may transition from bedrock to fill. If this condition is present the civil designer may specify either: a) A minimum of a two foot over excavation and recompaction of bedrock materials for a distance of 2 times the height of the wall. b) Increase of the amount of reinforcing steel and wall detailing (i.e., expansion joints or crack control joints) such that a angular distortion of 1/360 for a distance of 2H on either side of the transition may be accommodated. Expansion joints should be sealed with a flexible grout. If transitions from cut to fill transect the wall footing alignment at an angle of less than 45 degrees (plan view), then the designer should follow recommendation "a" (above) and until such transition is between 45 and 90 degrees to the wall alignment. PRELIMINARY PAVEMENT DESIGN A representative sample of site soil near existing grade was obtained and tested to determine the soils resistance value (R-value). R-value testing was performed in accordance with the latest revisions to the Department of Transportation, State of California, Materials & Research Test Method No. 301. Pavement sections presented are based on the R-value data, the anticipated design classification, based on information provided by the client, and the minimum requirements of the City of Carlsbad. For planning purposes, pavement sections consisting of asphaltic concrete over base and full depth Portland cement concrete pavement (PCCP) are provided. Anticipated asphaltic concrete and portland cement concrete pavement sections are presented in the following tables: GeoSoils, lne. I I I· I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I THE BLACKMORE COMPANY W.O. 1819-SC ,, ASPHALTIC CONCRETE PAVEMENT Parking Stalls Drive Areas Traffic Areas Traffic Areas 4.5 5.0 6.0 25 25 25 <1>oenotes standard Caltrans Class 2 aggregate base (R~78, SE~22). (2)City of Carlsbad minimum AC thickness. 4 4 4 APRIL 10, 1995 PAGE 16 4 4 7.5 Prfl values have been assumed for planning purposes herein and should be confirmed by the design team during Mure plan development CONCRETE PAVEMENT Parking Stalls 200 25 light 7.0 Traffic Areas 200 25 medium/heavy 8.0 <1>concrete shall be 560-C-3250 minimum. (2)ADTT values have been assumed for planning purposes herein and should be confirmed by the design team during Mure plan development For truck lanes and ramps, a 3 inch minimum layer of Class 2 aggregate base is recommended beneath the concrete paving. In order to improve performance of concrete pavement in parking or areas, the 3 inch base layer should also be considered in these areas. Transition thickness details will be needed between traffic areas and parking lanes. Desig·n of truck loading docks should utilize guidelines provided for truck lanes and ramps with special detailing for edges and jointing. Detailing of PCCP should be performed by the Civil Designer and should include load transfer joints and crack control joints for truck traffic areas. If requested, GSI will aid the civil designer with the minimum expansion and crack control joint spacings. Minimum steel to be provided near the midpoint of the slab (sectional view) to control concrete shrinkage is 6x6 w2.9xw2.9 welded wire mesh or equivalent. Trash enclosures areas should be designed per the minimum standards of the City of Carlsbad. Subgrade and Base Preparation The upper twelve inches of subgrade should be scarified, moisture conditioned to at least optimum moisture, and compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density. Class 2 GeoSoils, lne. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I THE BLACKMORE COMPANY W.O. 1819-SC APRIL 10, 1995 PAGE17 aggregate base should be compacted to at least 95 percent of its maximum dry density. If adverse conditions (i.e., saturated ground, etc.) are encountered during preparation of the subgrade materials, special construction methods may need to be employed. Subgrade soils should be at or above the soils optimum moisture content prior to placing pavement. Pavement Construction and Maintenance _ The recommended pavement sections are meant as minimums, if thinner or highly variable pavement sections are constructed, increased maintenance and repair may be needed. Positive site drainage should be maintained at all times. Water should not be allowed to pond or seep into the ground. If planters or landscaping are adjacent to paved areas, measures should be taken to minimize the potential for water to enter the pavement section. If the ADT (average daily traffic), ADTT (average daily truck traffic), or Tl (traffic index) increases beyond that intended, increased maintenance and repair could be required for the pavement sections. CONCRETEFLATWORK As is commonly known, expansive soils are problematic with respect to the design, construction and long term performance of concrete curbs, sidewalks, driveways and flatwork other areas. Due to the nature of concrete flatwork, it is essentially impossible to totally mitigate the effects of soil expansion. Typical measures to control soil expansion for structures include; low expansive s_oil caps, deepened foundation system, thickened edge work and increased structural design. As these remedial methods are generally not cost effective, they are very seldom utilized for flatwork, because it may be less costly to simply replace any damaged or distressed sections than to "structurally" design them. Alternatives to concrete may include paving stones and asphalt. Even if "structural" design parameters are applied to flatwork construction, there would still be relative movements between adjoining types of structures and other improvements ( e.g. curb and sidewalks, patio and structural). This is particularly true as the level of care during construction of flatwork is often not as meticulous as that for structures. Unfortunately, it is a fairly common practice for flatwork to be poured on subgrade soils which have been allowed to dry below optimum moisture contents since site grading. Generally, shortly after flatwork construction is completed, landscape irrigation begins, utility lines are pressurized, and drainage systems are utilized; presenting the potential for water to re-enter the "dry" subgrade soils, causing the soil to expand. Considering relatively uniform subgrade soil conditions, the greatest potential for visible offset is at the juncture of differing elements, such as the driveway, sidewalk and curb, and where soil moisture contents are allowed to fluctuate. We do not recommend use of a permeable, subbase below a concrete slab placed on expansive soil conditions. It is our opinion that this type of material (subbase) permits greater changes in the subgrade moisture content and therefore increases the potential for the subgrade material to undergo repeated events of heaving and shrinkage. GeoSoils, Inc. I I I I I I I ., I I I I I I I I I I I THE BLACKMORE COMPANY W.O. 1819-SC APRIL 10, 1995 PAGE 18 There are numerous items that could have an influence on the performance of concrete flatwork. In some cases, adverse conditions can be attributed to a single source/mechanism; however, often two or more processes combine to produce measured movements. Soils within the subject site area vary from low to medium expansive in nature. It appears that expansion of the soils represent the most significant potential mechanism which could adversely impact constructed flatwork. Some factors that also represent a potential influence on flatwork performance are discussed in the following sections and their effects should be considered during construction. • • • • Nature of Flatwork construction Drainage and landscape irrigation Adjacent excavation(s) Landscape construction Recommendations for concrete flatwork construction were developed in an attempt to mitigate a majority of the potential uplift, lateral movement and/or distress that might occur, due primarily to soil expansion. The intent of these recommendations are to decrease the potential for flatwork repair and replacement; but realistically that potential cannot be totally eliminated. Additionally, more stringent recommendations (beyond those provided) could be developed to further minimize the need for repair or replacement. Flatwork Construction _ The following minimum criteria should be incorporated into construction designs. 1. Sidewalks and exterior slabs should be constructed with a four (4) inch thick concrete slab and reinforced with welded wire mesh (6x6, w2.9 x w2.9) supported near the vertical midpoint of the slab. Hooking of the reinforcement is not considered an acceptable method of positioning the steel. This thickness design was determined based upon experience with the onsite soils and the presence of expansive soil at grade. The primary purpose of the wire mesh is to minimize vertical separation along cracks and expansion joints. 2. If "shade" sand, in any of the utility trenches, is exposed below the flatwork at least 12 inches of the sand should be removed and replaced with compacted fill soils (if possible). This should further minimize the potential for water to enter the subgrade soils. Consideration should be given to the geometry of the trench relative to the flatwork and the width of the trench used. 3. Presaturate the subgrade soils to a depth of 18 inches at 100 to 110 percent of optimum a minimum of at least 48 hours prior to pouring concrete. Soil presaturation should be verified by a representative of this office. The subgrade should not be excessively wet or muddy when concrete is poured. 4. Prior to pouring concrete all loose or otherwise deleterious materials should be removed. The subgrade soils should be reasonably compact. Observation, probing, and testing, if deemed necessary, may be required to verify adequate results. GeoSoils, lne. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I THE BLACKMORE COMPANY W.O. 1819-SC APRIL 10, 1995 PAGE19 5. Concrete cutoff walls should be constructed adjacent to any landscaped areas. Where concrete flatwork is contiguous, there is no need to construct cutoff wall(s). 6. The concrete should have a 28 day minimum strength of 2500 psi (i.e., 520 C-2500). 7. The use of transverse and longitudinal control joints should be considered to help control slab cracking due to concrete shrinkage or expansion. Two of the best ways to control this movement is; 1) add a sufficient amount of reinforcing steel, increasing tensile strength of the slab, and/or 2) provide an adequate amount of control and/or expansion joints to accommodate anticipated concrete shrinkage and expansion. We would suggest that the maximum control joint spacing be placed on 5 to 8 foot centers or the smallest dimension of the slab, whichever is least. 8. No traffic should be allowed upon the newly poured concrete slabs until they have been properly cured to within 75 percent of design strength. 9. Positive site drainage should be maintained at all times. Adjacent landscaping should be graded to drain into the street, parking area, or other approved area. All surface water should be appropriately directed to areas designed for site drainage. 10. In areas directly adjacent to a continuous source of moisture (i.e. irrigation, planters, ~ etc.), all joints should be sealed with flexible mastic. DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA Landscape Maintenance and Planting Water has been shown to weaken the inherent strength of soil and slope stability is significantly reduced by overly wet conditions. Positive surface drainage away from graded slopes should be maintained and only the amount of irrigation necessary to sustain plant life should be provided for planted slopes. _Overwatering should be avoided. Graded slopes constructed within and utilizing onsite materials would be erosive. Eroded debris may be minimized and surficial slope stability enhanced by establishing and maintaining a suitable vegetation cover soon after construction. Plants selected for landscaping should be light weight, deep rooted types which require little water and are capable of surviving the prevailing climate. Compaction to the face of fill slopes would tend to minimize short term erosion until vegetation is established. It order to minimize erosion on a slope face, an erosion control fabric (i.e. jute matting) should be considered. From a geotechnical standpoint leaching is not recommended for establishing landscaping. If the surface soils area processed for the purpose of adding amendments they should be recompacted to 90 percent relative compaction. GeoSoils, lne. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I, I I I THE BLACKMORE COMPANY W.O. 1819-SC Additional Grading APRIL 10, 1995 PAGE 20 This office should be notified in advance of any additional fill placement, regrading of the site, or trench backfilling after rough grading has been completed. This includes any grading, utility trench and retaining wall backfills. Footing Trench Excavation All footing trench excavations for structures and walls should be observed and approved by a representative of this office prior to placing reinforcement Footing trench spoil and any excess soils generated from utility trench excavations should be compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent if not removed from the site. Trenching All excavations should be observed by one of our representatives and conform to CAL-OSHA and local safety codes. Drainage Positive site drainage should be maintained at all times. Drainage should not flow uncontrolled down any descending slope. Water should be directed away from foundations and not allowed to pond and/or seep into the ground. Pad drainage should be directed toward the street or other approved area. Roof gutters and down spouts should be considered to control roof drainage. Down spouts should outlet a minimum of five feet from the proposed structure or into a subsurface drainage system. We would recommend that any proposed open bottom planters adjacent to proposed structures be eliminated for a minimum distance of 10 feet. As an alternative, closed bottom type planters could be utilized. An outlet placed in the bottom of the planter, could be installed to direct drainage away from structures or any exterior concrete flatwork. Adequate provisions should be made for drainage of proposed truck loading dock area(s). This should consider both surface drainage as well as retaining wall/foundation systems. Gravity drainage is recommended however a sump with pump(s) may be necessary. Utility Trench Backfill 1. All utility trench backfill in structural areas, slopes, and beneath hardscape features should be brought to near optimum moisture content and then compacted to obtain a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent of the laboratory standard. Flooding~etting is not recommended for the site soil materials. Jetting of trenches should not be performed on this project. 2. Sand backfill, unless trench excavation material, should not be allowed in exterior trenches adjacent to and within an area extending below a 1:1 plane projected from the outside bottom edge of the footing. 3. 4. All trench excavations should minimally conform to CAL-OSHA and local safety codes. Soils generated from utility trench excavations to be used onsite should be compacted to 90 percent minimum relative compaction. This material must not alter positive GeoSoils, Inc. I I I I I I I I I I~ I ·1 I I I I I I I THE BLACKMORE COMPANY W.O. 1819-SC APRIL 10, 1995 PAGE 21 5. drainage patterns that direct drainage away from the structural area and towards the street. The use of pipe jacking for the placement of utilities is not recommended on this site. PLAN REVIEW Final site development and foundation plans should be submitted to this office for review and comment, as the plans become available, for the purpose of minimizing any misunderstandings between the plans and recommendations presented herein. In addition, foundation excavations and any additional earthwork construction performed on the site should be observed and tested by this office. If conditions are found to differ substantially from those stated, appropriate recommendations would be offered at that time. LIMITATIONS The materials encountered on the project site and utilized in our laboratory study are believed representative of the area; however, soil and bedrock materials vary in character between excavations and natural outcrops or conditions exposed during mass grading. site conditions may vary due to seasonal changes or other factors. GeoSoils, Inc. assumes no responsibility or liability for work, testing or recommendations performed or provided by others. Since our study is based upon the site materials observed, selective laboratory testing and engineering analysis, the conclusion and recommendations are professional opinions. These opinions have been derived in accordance with current standards of practice and no warranty is expressed or implied. Standards of practice are subject to change with time. GeoSoils, lne. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I THE BLACKMORE COMPANY W.O. 1819-SC APRIL 10, 1995 PAGE 22 The opportunity to be of service is greatly appreciated. If you have any questions concerning this report or if we may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact any of the undersigned. Respectfully submitted, GeoSoils, Inc. E~~1-:G1892 Project Geolo ist Paul L. Mc lay, CEG 11 Principal Geologist EHUATG/PLM/mb Enclosure: Reference List ~ Appendix I, Log of Borings Appendix II, EQFAULT Appendix 111, Laboratory Test Results Appendix IV, Grading Guidelines Plate 1, Geotechnical Map Addressee Latitude 33, Attn: Mr. Andrew Kann Bilbro & Giffin, Attn: Mr. Rob Bilbro ~<l ~ Andrew T. Guatelli, RCE 47335 Principal Engineer xc: (2) (1) (1) (1) Smith Consulting Architects, Mr. Dennie Smith GeoSoils, Inc. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I REFERENCE LIST Blake, Thomas F., (undated 1991) EQ FAULT Computer Program For The Deterministic Prediction of Horizontal Accelerations From Digitized California faults. Campbell, K.W., (1993), "Empirical Prediction of Near-Source Ground Motion From Large Earthquakes"; Proceedings, International Workshop on Earthquake Hazard and Large Dams in the Himalaya. sponsored by the Indian National Trust for Art and Cultural Heritage (INTACH), New Delhi. India, January 15-16. Jennings, C.W., 1992, Preliminary Fault Activity Map of California, Scale 1 :750,000, DMG Open File Report 92-03. Sadigh, K., Egan, J., and Youngs, R. (1987), Predictive Ground Motion Equations Reported in: Joyner, W. B. and Boore, D. M. ( 1988), "Measurement. Characterization, and Prediction of Strong Ground Motion", in Von Thun. J.L., ed., Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics II, Recent Advances in Ground Motion Evaluation. American Society of Civil Engineers Geotechnical Special Publication No. 20, pp. 43-102. San Diego Geotechnical Consultants, Inc., July 26, 1982, "Supplemental Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Carlsbad Research Center, Phases II and Ill. Job No. SD1162-00. Weber. Harold. F., 1982. "Geologic Map of the Central-North Coastal Area of San Diego County, California, Showing Recent Slope Failures and Pre-Development Landslides". -I - I -I ·- I I. -I APPENDIX I ---LOG OF BORINGS -1 --I ·-- I --I --I I I I I I· I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .I I I I I W.O. 1819-SC Boring Depth (ft.) 8-1 0-0.5 0.5-2 8-2 0-0.4 0.4-1 DATE EXCAVATED: 3-14-95 EXCAVATION METHOD: HAND AUGER LOGGED BY: EHL LOG OF BORINGS Material Description ARTIFICIAL FILL (disced material): Medium green- yellow-brown mottled sandy silty CLAY to sandy clayey SILT (CUML), loose/soft, very moist . BEDROCK -POINT LOMA FORMATION: Light to medium olive gray siltstone/claystone, firm to hard, blocky, perched groundwater at 1.2' (recent heavy rains). Total depth= 2 feet No caving Perched groundwater at 1.2 feet Hole backfilled ARTIFICIAL FILL (disced material}: Medium green- yellow-brown mottled sandy silty CLAY to sandy clayey SILT (CUML), loose/soft, very moist. BEDROCK-POINT LOMA FORMATION: Light to medium olive gray siltstone/claystone, hard. Practical refusal at 1 foot. Total depth= 1 foot No caving No groundwater Hole backfilled I I I ·1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I THE BLACKMORE COMPANY W.O. 1819-SC Boring Depth (ft.) 8-3 0-0.4± 0.4-1 8-4 0-0.5± 0.5-2 APRIL 10, 1995 LOG OF BORINGS (CONT.) Material Description ARTIFICIAL FILL (disced material): Medium green- yellow-brown mottled sandy silty CLAY to sandy clayey SILT (CUML), loose/soft, very moist. BEDROCK -POINT LOMA FORMATION: Light to medium olive gray siltstone/claystone, locally oxidized yellow, hard. Total depth= 1 foot No caving No groundwater Hole backfilled ARTIFICIAL FILL (disced material): Medium green- yellow-brown mottled sandy silty CLAY to sandy clayey SILT (CUML), loose/soft, very moist. BEDROCK -POINT LOMA FORMATION: Medium to dark gray/green-gray siltstor,e/claystone, firm to hard, blocky, perched groundwater at 1 foot (recent heavy rains). Total depth= 2 feet No caving Perched groundwater at 1 foot Hole backfilled -- 1 I I I I I I I I . - I I I I I I I I I I THE BLACKMORE COMPANY W.O. 1819-SC Boring Depth (ft.) 8-5 0-0.5± 0.5-1.5 8-6 0-0.4± 0.4-1.0 APRIL 10, 1995 LOG OF BORINGS (CONT.) Material Description ARTIFICIAL FILL (disced material): Medium green- yellow-brown mottled sandy silty CLAY to sandy clayey SILT (CUML), loose/soft, very moist. BEDROCK -POINT LOMA FORMATION: Medium to dark gray/green-gray siltstone/claystone, firm to hard, blocky, perched groundwater at 1.2 feet (recent heavy rains). Total depth= 1.5 feet No caving Perched groundwater at 1.2 foot Hole backfilled ARTIFICIAL FILL (disced material): Medium green- yellow-brown mottled sandy silty CLAY to sandy clayey SILT (CUML), loose/soft, very moist. BEDROCK -POINT LOMA FORMATION: Medium to dark gray silty claystone to clayey siltstone, firm to hard, blocky. Practical refusal at 1 foot. Total depth= 1 foot No caving No groundwater Hole backfilled I 1· I I ,I I I ·1 I ·1 1· I --1 ·1 I I I .I· 1. APPENDIX 11 EQFAULT ;. I I I -I I I I I I I I I -1 I ,, ·::: * SEARCH PERFORMED F:R: JOB NUMBER: JOB NAME: Blackmo~e SITE COORDINAT~S: LATITUDE: 33.135 N LONGITUDE: 117.284 SEARCH RADIUS: lOC mi ATTENUATION RE~ATISN: .-.-.. --C.-:1-,..,_ ---._., ,:,_:-.:--~-J-,;:;,-., __ ._.._ '' "' :) Camcbell (:993) Horiz. UNCERTAINTY (M=~aan, S=Maan+l-Sig~a): M SCOND: 0 COMPUTE PEAK HORIZO~TAL ~CCEL~RATiON FAULT-DATA FIL~ US~): CALIF~T .DAT -O=Soil l=Rcc!--: SOURCE OF DEPT~ VALUES (A=A~tenLat:o~ Fila. F=Fault Data File): A I ,, I I I I I I I I ' -r -.-r.-,--J =- ":A~<. '. PEA'-< ~AG. :~cc. s: M~ --------------------------·---------_____ : ______ : _____ _ , ' IV 1 __________________________ 1 _________ • _____ i ______ , ______ 1 I i I I I .-::..f-... --. -. ' , . ..,_. "' -. --· -...... ....... .. ::::} ;:-_Jc_ ::,-c::;-.;s '.t ~ ..... . ,, . IBORF~GC ~7 ~. (Sa~ :acinto)'. f4: :~3;• S.50'. O.O:s: I \J , I ::: :: I __________________________ • _________ , _____ i ______ l _____ _ I :cAMF ROC~-C::MER.-COPPER M~N: 95 ~:52); 7.oo: 0.010: II: --------------------------:---------:-----:------:------ :cASP LOM~-CLARK (S.Jacin. )I 46 ( ~5)'. 7.co: 0.037: V __________________________ 1 _________ • _____ • ______ , ______ • ' I , :CAT~_INA =SCARP~ENT 38 ( ~2~'. 7.00; o.oso: VI __________________________ : _________ i _____ i ______ , _____ _ I I I I ;CHI!',C, 43: 77:·: 7.oo: 0.046: \/I __________________________ : _________ • _____ 1 ______ 1 _____ _ ! I I I c,,-.,v,--.-c~c~:r ( ~ -'T • , ) I ",.., , ~-' I 7 00 1 ~ 034 I I V,v,C. ~1,..C.;"\, :::a:l _,ac1n-co I<-,';/\ ,'";j/l • • v. j' V I ; I -----------------------------------,-----.------1------ :cucAMONG;. 72 ~1:6): 1.00: 0.023: IV ;-----------------------------------:-----~------:------ I I I I :E1 _ _s:~mRE : 23: 37): 7.50; 0.140: VIII ;1 I : i I --------------------------,-------,-! -t - :ELYSIAN PARK SEISMIC ZONE : 79 (127): 7.oo: 0.019: IV : 1 '-----------~--------------• _________ 1 _____ , ______ 1 ______ 1 I J l : I ! iGLN.~ELEN-LYTLE cR-CLREMNTl so C so): 7.oo: o.033:. v : , 5.75 :.c:~3: -----------:------ :S.7.S \) ~.2s c.c:2: v ------·------= . SC ::: . C::, S ; : ·,; -TT .!.J.. ..!. _____ • ______ 1 _____ _ 6 . 25 C· ~ C:. 2 ~ : I I _____ i ______ i _____ _ • I 0.033: _____ : ______ 1 _____ _ . , 5 . 7 5 ' 0 . C :) 7 : .!...L -----·------1------ 6.50' O.C~J: IV I I I -----------------------------------,-----1------,------I l I I :-----;------!------ :HELE~DALE 84 (135): 7.30: 0.016: IV : s.7s: o.c0s; :r :--------------------------:---------:-----:------:------: -----!------;------ ;HOMESTEAD VALLEY : 94 (151): 7.so: 0.01s: IV 1 : 4.oo: o.cc1: , I I I ______ 1 _____ , ______ t _____ _ I l I ! I I I ;HOTS-BUCK RDG.(S.Jacinto): 50 ( 80): 7.oo: 0.034 ~ : 6.00; 0.0:6: IV --------------------------'---------_____ 1 ______ ------1 _____ 1 ______ 1 _____ _ I I I I · I :JOHNSON VALLEY : 86 (139) 7.so: 0.018 IV 1 : 5.25' 0.003: I '--------------------------·--------------'------------, _____ , ______ , _____ _ I I I I I I 'LA NACION : 22 ( 35) 6.so: 0.099 VII : 4.2s: 0.0:9: IV __________________________ 1 _________ -----'------'------1 _____ 1 ______ 1 _____ _ I J I 1 : ! LENWOOD-GLD WOMAN SPRINGS 91 (146) 7.30; 0.014: IV ; 5.25' O.C'-)3; _____ 1 ______ 1 ______ I i I I I I : l MAL2:3U CCAST 96 (.1.55;; 7.so: 0.019: IV : 6.so· o.oos: :::II l l I I _____ i ______ i _____ _ • • I I 1:. :.7~; 7.00; 0.239: IX ' I ---, ,-. ::;, ,. I':::) ---------'-----'------'------______ : _____ _ I / '7 . :_ :s', c.026: \/ --, .--~. /::,. ,:: . C)S: -----------------------------------.-----~------:------______ : _____ _ ?6 :' 7.so: 0.!45: VIII _____ 1 ______ :------ 7.?c' o.c22: I\J ---------·-----.------'.------. -: -' . r, -.,/ -, -o ,' .. .::: _____ : ______ i _____ _ L< ----------------------------------------------------, ' .. ~ . .:. :..7. '' V ' i ' I : ______ , ______ . I , 'r, -. ..,;·\ .. ::, . ,)C ::.: .. Cs7: ,.,. .,. .,, .!. l. ______ , _____ _ ' ------·------ -........ ; .,, . ..:.. .. -' r .. -, -.. '---/ l ·. : I I :. \/ I· 1, I I I I I I 1, I I .I 1: I I ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- i~28REV I ATED F:.'.;UI_ T ,'·IA1'1E. :MAX. CREDIBLE EVENT: :MAX. PROBABLE EVENT ; APPRO~< .. : DISTA!'-lCE ; MA~<.: PEi~d< : SITE : : MAX.: PEAi< : SITE '. mi ( ;,,Tl) :cRED.: SITE ;INTENS: ; ~~G. :Acc. ;: MM : F-'RC8 ~; SITE i I('!T=J'-1:3 : MAG.:Acc. ~: MM I I : I I I I I l ! --I -----I------ : S ,-4 i',J A f\l DR'.:: PlS ( Mo j av a ) ' 8 0 ( 1 2 9 ) : 8 . 3 0 : O . 0 4 O : \/ : 8 . O O ; 0 . 0 '.31 : \/ l __________________________ • _________ 1 _____ 1 ______ 1 ______ 1 I I I I I I I I ,---, -----,------ :sAN Ai'lDREAS (S. Be~n.Mt.n. ); 68 (109): 8.00: 0.042: \II : 6.75; 0.016: I'v' -----------------------:--------:---:------:------:-----:------:------ : SHN CLEM::::NTC:: -SAl'l ISIDRC : 56 ( 39): 8 .0C: 0 .059: VI : 6 .50; 0 .019: IV I I I I I I I i I -----------------I --! I -I ---I I ---I -----I ----- : sAND HIL'.....S : 93 ( 149): 8.00: 0.024: IV : 6.75: 0.003: III I I I I I I I ----------------------,--I I I ! :sAN DIEGO TRGH.-BAHIA SOL.: 32 ( 52); 7.so: 0.092: VII : I I I I --------------------------,---------, ---1------,----- SAN GABRIEL : 86 (138): 7.oo: 0.012: III __________________________ 1 _________ 1 _____ 1 ______ 1 _____ _ I l I I SAN GORGONIO -BANNING : 61 ( 98): 7.so: 0.046: VI --------------------------_________ 1 _____ 1 ______ 1 _____ _ I I I SANTA MONICA -HOLLYWOOD 87 (140): 7.so: 0.023: IV SIERRA MADRE-SAN FERNANDO SUPERSTITION HLS.(S.Jacin) ------------------------ SUPERSTITION MTN.(S.Jacin) _________ 1 _____ 1 ______ , _____ _ I I I 76 (122): 7.so: 0.031: v _________ 1 _____ 1 ______ 1 _____ _ I I I 83 ( 134 ) : 7 . 00 : 0 . 013: I I I ---------:-----:------:------ 78 (126): 7.oo: 0.01s: IV _________ , _____ , ______ 1 _____ _ _____ i ______ 1 _____ _ I ' : 6.2s: 0.037: V 1 _____ 1 ______ 1 _____ _ I I I : 5. 75: 0 .004: I I I I ,----I _____ I _____ _ : 7.oo: 0.031: v _____ r _____ _ I s.2s: 0.004 I _____ 1 _____ _ I 6.00: 0.009 III -----'------' 6.2s: 0.007 II _____ 1 _____ _ I 6.2s: o.oos III -----'------------I I I 1 I I VERDUGO : 84 (135): 6.70: 0.013: I I I : : 4. 50: 0. 002 __________________________ 1 _________ 1 _____ 1 ______ 1 ______ 1 I _____ , ______ ------ 1 I I I I I I I :wHITTIER -NORTH ELSINORE : 47 ( 75): 7.50: 0.054: VI : : 6.00: 0.017 IV 1 __________________________ 1 _________ 1 _____ 1 ______ 1 ______ 1 _____ 1 ______ ------ 1 I I I I I I ***************************************************************************** -END OF SEARCH-38 FAULTS FOUND WITHIN THE SPECIFIED SEARCH RADIUS. THE ROSE CANYON FAULT IS CLOSEST TO THE SITE. IT IS ABOUT 6.4 MI~ES AWAY. LARGEST MAXIMUM-CREDIBLE SITE ACCELERATION: LARGEST MAXIMUM-PROBABLE SITE ACCE:_ERA TI ON: 0.365 g 0.204 g ·, .. I I I I 1·. ,. -:,-. ' ' I II I I 1· I I 1· :I I I APPENDIX Ill LA.BORA TORY TEST RESULTS I 1: I I I I: I :I I, I I I I I I I ~., IIUi!!.U TESTED FOR: GeoSoils, Inc. 5741 Palmer Way Professional Service lndustries1 tnc. (E!~CEIVED 1 REPORT OF RESISTANCE "R" VALUE . /BY: APR. -6 1995 I PROJECT: GeoSoils, Inc. .;;.; Carlsbad, California 92008 WORKOROER#: 1819 DATE: March 29, 1995 OUR REPORT NO: 059-40188-16 R.V.No: #10 Project Designation: 84@0-1' Sample Identification: A B C D Compactor Pressure, psi 100 75 150 Moisture @ Compaction, % 27.1 28.0 26.1 Density, pcf 94.60 93.75 96.67 R-Value 24 20 27 Exudation Pressure, psi 290 240 330 Stabilometer Thickness, ft. 1.09 1.15 1.04 Expansion Pressure Thickness, ft. 24 18 29 Traffic Index (Assumed} -Sand Equivalent -- R-Value-Exudation Pressure 25 A-Value-Expansion Pressure - A-Value (At Equilibrium} 25 REMARKS: DJR:wlw Respectfully submitted, PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. 6867 Nancy Ridge Dr . S1.,:te E • San Diego, CA 92121 • I I ,I ,I I I I ,1 I I I ,, I ,, I I I I I 3.0,------,---------,-------,-------r--------,--------- I i 0 2.5r------i-------+------+------+--------,------,,"""' 2.01------1--------t-------+/----7'~~-I o/ i 1.5// ,,(J _/ I () V ... ( 0 1.0t------i-------+------+------+------+------1 0.51------1-------+------+------+------+------I o.___ ____ .__ ____ _.__--'-___ _.__ ____ ~-------'-----__J 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 NORMAL PRESSURE-KSF EXPLANATION 0 RESHEAR -AT SATURATED MOISTURE CONTENT e PEAK -AT SATURATED MOISTURE CONTENT 2.0 2.5 3.0 DIRECT SHEAR REMOLDED TO 90% RELATIVE DENSITY; THEN SATURATED UNDISTURBED NATURAL SHEAR SATURATED NATURAL PCF % MOISTURE % SATURATED MOISTURE CONTENT % SATURATED MOISTURE CONTENT SHEAR TEST DIAGRAM BORING B-4 @ l 1 GeoSails·, Ine. DATE _3/_9_5 __ ,,w.o. NO 1819-SC Soil Mechanics • Geology • Foundation Engineering FORM 87 /8-2A PLATE SH-1 I I .I I I I I .1· I II I I 1: ,I ·1 I ·1 1. I 3.0,------,------.-----r------.------,---------. 2.5i---------+------,i---------;--------r------+--------I 2.0i---------+-------1i---------;-------t------+--------1 ! 0) I ~~ I-1.5 i .~~ rn 1.0 -----1'.D ~~ o.5r---------+-------t------+------+------+-------1 o..__ ___ __, _____ ,___ ___ _._ ____ __,_ ____ ____. ____ __J 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 NORMAL PRESSURE-KSF EXPLANATION 0 RESHEAR -AT SATURATED MOISTURE CONTENT e PEAK -AT SATURATED MOISTURE CONTENT 2.0 2.5 3.0 DIRECT SHEAR REMOLDED TO 90'l6 RELATIVE DENSITY; THEN SATURATED UNDISTURBED NATURAL SHEAR SATURATED REMOLDED 103.5 PCF 22% MOISTURE 28.0% SATURATED MOISTURE CONTENT CJ6 SATURATED MOISTURE CONTENT SHEAR TEST DIAGRAM BORING B-4@ I' GeoSoils, lne. DATE 3/95 .I w. 0. NO 1819-SC Soil Mechanics • Geology • Foundation Engineering FORM 87 /8-2A PLATE SH-21 I I I I ,, I: I I I I· ·1 I .I I I I I I I APPENDIX IV GRADING GUIDELINES I I I ,, I ·I I ·I I I· I 1. 1, . , I I . I' I I GRADING GUIDELINES Grading should be performed to at least the minimum requirements of the governing agencies, Chapter 70 of the Uniform Building Code and the guidelines presented below: Site Clearing Trees, dense vegetation, and other deleterious materials should be removed from the site. Non- organic debris or concrete may be placed in deeper fill areas under direction of the Soils Engineer. Light, dry grasses may be thinly scattered and incorporated into the fill under direction of the Soils Engineer, provided concentrations of organics are not developed. Subdrainage 1. Subdrainage systems should be provided in all canyon bottoms and within buttress and stabilization fills prior to placing fill. Subdrains should conform to schematic diagrams GS-1, GS-3, and GS-4, approved by the Soils Engineer. For canyon subdrains, runs less than 500 feet may use six inch pipe. Runs in excess of 500 feet should have the lower end as eight inch minimum. 2. Filter material should be Class 2 permeable filter material per California Department of Transportation Standards tested by the Soils Engineer to verify its suitability. A sample of the material should be provided to the Soils Engineer by the contractor at least two working days before it is delivered to the site. The filter should be clean with a wide range of sizes. As an alternative to the Class 2 filter, the material may be a 50l50 mix of pea gravel and clean concrete sand which is well mixed, or clean gravel wrapped in a suitable filter fabric. 3. An exact delineation of anticipated subdrain locations may be determined at 40 scale plan review stage. During grading, the Engineering Geologist should evaluate the necessity of placing additional drains. 4. All subdrainage systems should be observed by the Engineering Geologist and Soils Engineer during construction and prior to covering with compacted fill. 5. Consideration should be given to having subdrains located by the project surveyors . Outlets should be located and protected. Treatment of Existing Ground ·. 1. All heavy vegetation, rubbish and other deleterious materials should be disposed of off site. 2. All surficial deposits of alluvium and colluvium should be removed (see Plate GS-1) unless otherwise indicated in the text of this report. Groundwater existing in the alluvial areas may make excavation difficult. Deeper removals than indicated in the text of the report may be necessary due to saturation during winter months . GeoSoils, lne. I I I I I I I I I I .I I I I I I I I I THE BLACKMORE COMPANY W.O. 1819-SC APRIL 10, 1995 PAGE2 3. GRADING GUIDELINES Subsequent to removals, the natural ground should be processed to a depth of six inches, moistened to near optimum moisture conditions and compacted to fill standards. Fill Placement 1. All site soil and bedrock may be reused for compacted fill; however, some special processing or handling may be required (see report). 2. Material used in the compacting process should be evenly spread, moisture conditioned, processed, and compacted in thin lifts not to exceed six inches in thickness to obtain a uniformly dense layer. The fill should be placed and compacted on a horizontal plane, unless otherwise found acceptable by the Soils Engineer. 3. If the moisture content or relative density varies from that acceptable to the Soils Engineer, the Contractor should rework the fill until it is in accordance with the following: 4. 5. 6. a) Moisture content of the fill should be at or above optimum moisture. Moisture should be evenly distributed without wet and dry pockets. Pre-watering of cut or removal areas should be considered in addition to watering during fill placement, particularly in clay or dry surficial soils. b) Each six inch layer should be compacted to at least 90 percent of the maximum density in compliance with the testing method specified by the controlling governmental agency. In this case, the testing method is ASTM Test Designation D-1557-91. Side-hill fills should have an equipment-width key at their toe excavated through all surficial soil and into competent material and tilted back into the hill (GS-2, GS-6). As the fill is elevated, it should be benched through surficial soil and slopewash, and into competent bedrock or other material deemed suitable by the Soils Engineer. Rock fragments less than eight inches in diameter may be utilized in the fill, provided: a) They are not placed in concentrated pockets; b) There is a sufficient percentage of fine-grained material to surround the rocks; c) The distribution of the rocks is supervised by the Soils Engineer. Rocks greater than eight inches in diameter should be taken off site, or placed in accordance with the recommendations of the Soils Engineer in areas designated as suitable for rock disposal (See GS-5). GeoSoils, lne. I I ,I I I 1, I I I I I I I I I I ,I I I THE BLACKMORE COMPANY W.O. 1819-SC APRIL 10, 1995 PAGE3 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. GRADING GUIDELINES In clay soil large chunks or blocks are common; if in excess of eight (8) inches minimum dimension then they are considered as oversized. Sheepsfoot compactors or other suitable methods should be used to break the up blocks. The Contractor should be required to obtain a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent out to the finished slope face of fill slopes. This may be achieved by either overbuilding the slope and cutting back to the compacted core, or by direct compaction of the slope face with suitable equipment. If fill slopes are built "at grade" using direct compaction methods then the slope construction should be performed so that a constant gradient is maintained throughout construction. Soil should not be "spilled" over the slope face nor should slopes be "pushed out" to obtain grades. Compaction equipment should compact each lift along the immediate top of slope. Slopes should be back rolled approximately every 4 feet vertically as the slope is built. Density tests should be taken periodically during grading on the flat surface of the fill three to five feet horizontally from the face of the slope. In addition, if a method other than over building and cutting back to the compacted core is to be employed, slope compaction testing during construction should include testing the outer six inches to three feet in the slope face to determine if the required compaction is being achieved. Finish grade testing of the slope should be performed after construction is complete. Each day the Contractor should receive a copy of the Soils Engineer's "Daily Field Engineering Report" which would indicate the results of field density tests that day. Fill over cut slopes should be constructed in the following manner: a) All surficial soils and weathered rock materials should be removed at the cut-fill interface. · b) A key at least 1 equipment width wide and tipped at least 1 foot into slope should be excavated into competent materials and observed by the soils engineer or his representative. c) The cut portion of the slope should be constructed prior to fill placement to evaluate if stabilization is necessary, the contractor should be responsible for any additional earthwork created by placing fill prior to cut excavation. Transition lots (cut and fill) and lots above stabilization fills should be capped with a three foot thick compacted fill blanket. Cut pads should be observed by the Engineering Geologist to evaluate the need for overexcavation and replacement with fill. This may be necessary to reduce water GeoSoils, Ine. I I I I I ,, --1 I I I I I I I I I I I I THE BLACKMORE COMPANY W.O. 1819-SC APRIL 10, 1995 PAGE4 GRADING GUIDELINES infiltration into highly fractured bedrock or other permeable zones.and/or due to differing expansive potential of materials beneath a structure. The overexcavation should be at least three feet. Deeper overexcavation may be recommended in some cases. 12. Exploratory backhoe or dozer trenches still remaining after site removal should be excavated and filled with compacted fill if they can be located. Grading Observation and Testing 1. Observation of the fill placement should be provided by the Soils Engineer during the progress of grading. 2. In general, density tests would be made at intervals not exceeding two feet of fill height or every 1,000 cubic yards of fill placed. This criteria will vary depending on soil conditions and the size of the fill. In any event, an adequate number of field density tests should be made to evaluate if the required compaction and moisture content is generally being obtained. 3. Density tests may be made on the surface material to receive fill, as required by the Soils Engineer. 4. Cleanouts, processed ground to receive fill, key excavations,subdrains and rock disposal should be observed by the Soils Engineer prior to placing any fill. It will be the Contractor's responsibility to notify the Soils Engineer when such areas are ready for observation. 5. An Engineering Geologist should observe subdrain construction. 6. An Engineering Geologist should observe benching prior to and during placement of fill. Utility Trench Backfill Utility trench backfill should be placed to the following standards: 1. Ninety percent of the laboratory standard if native material is used as backfill. 2. 3. As an alternative, clean sand may be utilized and flooded into place. No specific relative compaction would be required; however, observation, probing, and if deemed necessary, testing may be required. Exterior trenches, paralleling a footing and extending below a 1:1 plane projected from the outside bottom edge of the footing, should be compacted to 90 percent of the laboratory standard. Sand backfill, until it is similar to the inplace fill, should not be allowed in these trench backfill areas. Density testing along with probing should be accomplished to verify the desired results. GeoSoils, Inc. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Ii I I I I THE BLACKMORE COMPANY W.O. 1819-SC JOB SAFETY General: GRADING GUIDELINES APRIL 10, 1995 PAGE 5 At GeoSoils, Inc., getting the job done safely is of primary concern. The following is the company's safety considerations for use by all employees on multi-employer construction sites. On ground personnel are at highest risk of injury and possible fatality on grading construction projects. The company recognizes that construction activities will vary on each site and that job site safety is the contractor's responsibility. However, it is, imperative that all personnel be safety conscious to avoid accidents and potential injury. In an effort to minimize risks associated with geotechnical testing and observation, the following precautions are to be implemented for the safety of our field personnel on grading and construction projects. 1. Safety Meetings: Our field personnel are directed to attend the contractor's regularly scheduled safety meetings. 2. Safety Vests: Safety vests are provided for and are to be worn by our personnel where warranted. 3. Safety Flags: Two safety flags are provided to our field technician; one i~ to be affixed to the vehicle when on site, the other is to be placed atop the spoil pile on all test pits. In the event that the contractor's representative observes any of our personnel not following the above, we request that it be brought to the attention of our office. Test Pits Location, Orientation and Clearance: The technician is responsible for selecting test pit locations. The primary concern is the technician's safety. However, it is necessary to take sufficient tests at various location to obtain a representative sampling of the fill. As such, efforts will be made to coordinate locations with the grading contractors authorized representatives (e.g. dump man, operator, supervisor, grade checker, etc.), and to select locations following or behind the established traffic pattern, preferable outside of-current traffic. The contractors authorized representative should direct excavation of the pit and safety during the test period. Again, safety is the paramount concern. Test pits should be excavated so that the spoil pile is placed away from oncoming traffic. The technician's vehicle is to be placed next to the test pit, opposite the spoil pile. This necessitates that the fill be maintained in a driveable condition. Alternatively, the contractor may opt to park a piece of equipment in front of the test pits, particularly in small fill areas or those with limited access. A zone of non-encroachment should be established for all test pits (see Plate GS-7). No grading equipment should enter this zone during the test procedure. The zone should extend approximately 50 feet outward from the center of the test pit. This zone is established both for safety and to avoid excessive ground vibration which typically decreases test results. When taking slope tests, the technician should park their vehicle directly above or below the test GeoSoils, lne. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ,, I I I I THE BLACKMORE COMPANY W.O. 1819-SC GRADING GUIDELINES APRIL 10, 1995 PAGES location on the slope. The contractor's representative should effectively keep all equipment at a safe operation distance (e.g. 50 feet) away from the slope during testing. The technician is directed to withdraw from the active portion of the fill as soon as possible following testing. The technician·s vehicle should be parked at the perimeter of the fill in a highly visible location. In the event that the technician's safety is jeopardized or compromised as a result of the contractor's failure to comply with any of the above, the technician is directed to inform both the developer's and contractor's representatives. If the condition is not rectified, the technician is required, by company policy, to immediately withdraw and notify their supervisor. The grading contractors representative will then be contacted in an effort to effect a solution. No further testing will be performed until the situation is rectified. Any fill placed in the interim can be considered unacceptable and subject to reprocessing, recompaction or removal. In the event that the soil technician does not comply with the above or other established safety guidelines, we request that the contractor brings this to technicians attention and notify our the project manager or office. Effective communication and coordination between the contractors' representative and the field technician(s) is strongly encouraged in order to implement the above safety program and safety in general. The safety procedures outlined above should be discussed at the contractor's safety meetings. This will serve to inform and remind the equipment operators of these safety procedures particularly the zone of non-encroachment Trench Safety: It is the contractor's responsibility to provide safe access into trenches where compaction testing is needed. Our personnel are dire~ted not to enter any excavation which 1) is 5 feet or deeper unless shored or laid back, 2) displays any evidence of instability, has any loose rock or other debris which could fall into the trench, or 3) displays any other evidence of any unsafe conditions regardless of depth .. All utility trench excavations in excess of 5 feet deep, which a person enters, are to be shored or laid back. Trench access should be provided in accordance with OSHA standards. Our personnel are directed not to enter any trench by being lowered or "riding down" on the equipment. If the contractor fails to provide safe access to trenches for compaction testing, our company policy requires that the soil technician withdraw and notify their supervisor. The contractors representative will then be contacted in an effort to effect a solution. All backfill not tested due to safety concerns or other reasons could be subject to reprocessing and/or removal. GeoSoils, Inc~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Final Grade" ground Suitable Material Bench where slope exceeds 5: I J(;~~·:::~:·\".:) .:-_: --::,: ·?·:) ·_tT<·,) a·~oSof1$;<<r rie. ', •, .. ,. FORM 89/22 Surface --ti \Subdrain (See Plate GS-3) TYPICAL TREATMENT Of: NATURAL GROUND. DATE _4_/9_5 __ 1w.o. NO. 1819-SC Geotechnical Engineering • Engineering Geology Pl A Tl= ~~-I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ., I I I I I - PROJECTED I 1/z. 1 I TOE SHOWN ON GRADING PLAN ------- --1-----------,.,,. n --_,,,.,,,,,,. cttt".,,,,.- .,,,,..,,,,.,,. ot -.,,,,,,. -i_ .,.... ·ut'f\• --\ \) .. \ ,-...--------~ :;.,, 0\ 1 -/ -' ._ -t :,, ~o9s .,,, .,,,,,,. 10' Typica I 1 --., co\ -..,,,,.-p1_11141-' / r ..,,,,.-, / ;1---:-/ y ---I ' / ----- ,I _.I_ I_ I_ I_ t_ I_ t I -/'\I - 2'/'-I"-/, I 1,,1,,~/1"" /' BEDROCK OR FIRM FORMATION MATERIAL Minimum~-15' Minimum-----~ Note= Where natural slope gradient is 5= I or less, benc_hing is not necessary unless stripping did not remove all compressible material. TYPICAL FILL OVER NATURAL SLOP DATE 4/95 w. o. NQ ..... ___.1-s ... 19=-..,sc...__ ____ _ Geotechnical Engineering • Engineering Geology FORM 89122 Pl ATF GS-2 -I I I I I I I I· I I I I I I I I I I I ALTERNATE 1 ALTERNATE 2 FORM 89/22 SOIL -SLOPEW ASH ALLUVIUM REMOVED TO BEDROCK ... , , , ' .... , Canyon subdrain : s• perforated pipe with 9 cu. ft. gravel per ft. of drain wraped with filter fabric. e> ,,.,,,., ~ ';,"I "' o_,,,::;,;I -•/ ..., I _:,,,. I -- 0 I •. /-I I .., I ' s• perforated pipe with 9 cu. ft. gravel per ft. of drain wraped with filter fabric. CANYON SUBDRAIN DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION DATE __ 4...._/=95 ___ W.O. NO 1819-SC Geotechnical Engineering • Engineering Geology Pl A TF= r,S-3 ·- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I FINISHED SURFACE A. Buttress slope to have a bench at every 20 to 30 .feet. 8. Buttress key depth varies. (see preliminary reports) C. Buttress key width varies. (see preliminary reports) D. Backdroins and lateral drains located at elevation of every bench drain. First drain at elevation just above lower lot grade. Additional drains may be required at discretion of GeoSoils, Inc. 3611 THICK FILL CAP 2%__,. . - 4 11 pert o r a t e d pi p e (or approved equivalent) placed in I cu. ft .. per linear ft. of graded filter materiol.Jt Pipe to extend • • .... f u 11 I e n g t h of • ~ · •6 • : ,: .. b tt • . . "A•4. ,_ U• ress; 0 :-1•:A ~-~·A/ .... /- ;. !"-" . . . . ... 1,.:_,/,,_ 4 11 nonperforated ... .... --- pipe lateral to.: Pipe 1"- slope face at. --above -- 100' inte rv9 Is • .: benc~-. . ------.... , I -/ ;' -1,-, .... • /, ........ _ 1'-Graded filter material to conform to State of Calif. Dept. Public Works standard spec if i ca t i o n s for. CI as s 2 permeable material /:~r-··:{\;.:) :'irez;' :.~; ·. . . :- G~o-~af ls·;-·-In~. TYPICAL BUTTRESS SECTION DATE . 4195 W. 0. N Q 1819-SC ~ ·,./ :' ...... Geotechnical Engineering • Engineering Geology !=ORM 89/22 Pl A Tl= r,s-4 -I I ·-- 1 I -- I I I I I --- 1 I I I I I I I I I FILLl SLOPE t. EQUIPMENT WIDTH1 =c-o:xpx,ooco Soi I sha II be pushed over rocks -and floode into voids. Compact a r o u n d a n d o v e r each windrow. Stack boulders end to end. D o no t p i I e up o n ea c h o th e r. 1 O' Typical ~ ----.-<)---o--o--....., t tagger rows , O O O O ',..c---15' t 3 1 mini mum-----. '~inimum ___ 0_ o a a ~ o'--, ' I '-/ ~------=-......____ 1~15' Miri.-+I ' SLOPE I, /...._ I I ...._ , -I ' "' ....._ ' I / ' ...,_ / -_-/:------------- ! FI R M G R OU N D -/ , / / ' / / -. / / / '/ ' /' ' ..... /, ..... ,,,_ / ROCK DISPOSAL DETAIL .--~:-. '-:\ ~ . Ge0Soils;:<1ne. DATE 4/95 W.O. NO 1819-SC Geotechnical Engineering • Engineering Geology !=ORM 89/22 Pl ATE GS-5 .-- 1 -I -- I I I I - I I ··- I I ··-I I I I I I I I I REMOVE ALL TOPSOIL, COLLUVIUM AND CREEP MATERIAL FROM TRANSIT ION FILL -----------:1 _,,.,. ---...-ctee 9----... , --tf\ ot --/\ ---~ \ \l .:-__.,::;._. ___ ____. I / --co\\\l --I T . I ' :..--0,,,_,,.,.---4 yp1co 1 ' ~o9S _i_ ~--I-/_ I ~ ~ ----_,,.,. ,i ,..... /' ' ... 10' Ty pica I ----~~-----1 --~'I_ I_/ ./~ --... , ., , , ' / ' ..... _ --_,,.,. CUT SLOPE -,_-15' Minimum I -I ______ _., -I ,, \ I I 1-1 -, ' ' ,, ' .... ' _, FORM 89/22 BEDROCK OR FIRM FORMATION MATERIAL TYPICAL FILL OVER CUT· SLOPE DATE ___,_4...,./9 ___ 5 __ .w.o. N0.__...18""1 .... 9-... s ..... c ____ _ Geotechnical Engineering • Engineering Geology PLATE GS-6 -. I I 1· I I - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I FORM 89/22 TEST PIT SAFETY DIAGRAM SIDE VIEW { NOT TO SCALE ) ~ TOP VIEW 50 FEET SPOIL PILE APPROXJMATE CENTER ·a:· TEST PIT 100 FEET 0 DATE 4/95 50 FEET VEHICLE W. 0. NO 1819-SC Geotechnical Engineering • Engineering Geology . a:--~ TITLE 24 REPORT FOR: LUCENT TITANIA CARLSBAD,CA PROJECT DESIGNER: REPORT PREPARED BY: GREG DAVIS ENERGY CONSULTING GROUP 8015 BALBOA SAN DIEGO, CA 92111 (619) 268-0660 Job Number: Date: 4/19/1999 The COMPLY 24 computer program has been used to perform the calculations summarized in this compliance report. This program has approval and is authorized by the California Energy Commission for use h th the Residential and Nonresidential Building Energy Efficie =~~ This program developed by Gabel Dodd/EnergySoft, llc , -,-~/0 Table Of Cont~nts for Title 24 Report Cover Page 1 Table of Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Nonresidential Performance Title 24 Forms ........................... 3 Form ENV-3 Construction Assemblies .................................. 18 Zone Loads Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 O ( . PERFORMANCE CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE (part 1 of 3) PERF-1 page 3 of 34 Run Initiation Time: 13: 0: 4 Runcode: 2984-647194624 Project Name: LUCENT TITANIA Address: CARLSBAD,CA Designer: Documentation: ENERGY CONSULTING GROUP STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE Date: 4/19/1999 Building Permit No Checked by/ Date COMPLY 24 User 2984 This Certificate of Compliance lists the Building features and performance specifications needed to comply with Title 24, Parts 1 and 6, of the State· Building Code. This certificate applies only to a Building using the performance compliance approach. The Principal Designers hereby certify that the proposed building design represented in the construction documents and modelled for this permit application are consistent with all other forms and worksheets, specifi- cations, and other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed building as designed meets the energy efficiency requirements of the State Building Code, Title 24, Part 6, Chapter 1. G I hereby affirm that I am eligible under the provisions of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code to sign this document as the person responsible for its preparation; and that I am licensed as a civil' engineer, mechanical engineer, electrical engineer or architect. 2. I affirm _that I am eligible· under the exemption to Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code by Section 5537.2 of the Business and Professions Code to sign this document as the person responsible for its preparation; and that I am a licensed contractor preparing documents for work that I have contracted to perform. 3. I affirm that I am eligible under the exemption to Division 3 of the of the person responsible for its Business and Professions Code by Section Code to sign th~s document as the preparation; and for the following reason: --------------- SCOPE OF COMPLIANCE (Designers should circle applicable paragraph numbers) ENVELOPE -Required Forms: ENV-1, ENV-2 Location of Mandatory Measures on Plans J\'\~I Principal Designer LIGHTING - ~r~ C 1111~lr\ air;1e? 4 i1 I\~ LIGHTING COMPLIANCE NOT IN THE SCOPE OF THIS SUBMITTAL MECHANICAL - Principal Designer WEATHER ENGINEERING (619)541-1885 Required Forms: MECH-1, MECH-21 MECH-3, MECH-4 Location of Mandatory M Plans Lt~/H~:'.::::::~'-1.!J/i~, ,!.I!./CJCz 1 (p 3 (Date) (Circle) .-PERFORMANCE CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE (part 2 of 3) PERF-1 page 4 of 34 Run Initiation Time: 13: 0: 4 Runcode: 2984-647194624 Project Name: LUCENT TITANIA Documentation: ENERGY CONSULTING GROUP Date: 4/19/1999 COMPLY 24 User 2984 ANNUAL SOURCE ENERGY USE SUMMARY (KBtu/sqft-yr) Energy Component ------------------------ Space Heating Space Cooling Indoor Fans Heat Rejection Pumps Domestic Hot Water Lighting Receptacle Process TOTALS GENERAL INFORMATION Conditioned Floor Area: Average Ceiling Height: Glass Area/ Wall Area: Average Glazing U-Value: 30640 11. 0 0.03 1.19 Standard Proposed Compliance Design Design Margin -------------------------- 6.60 7.74 -1.14 50.26 37.69 12.57 102.16 97.61 4.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.47 -7.47 2.54 2.54 0.00 47.78 47.78 0.00 14.28 14.28 0.00 191. 51 191. 51 0.00 -------------------------- 415.13 406.62 8.52 Compliance Method: COMPLY 24 vS.10 Location: Carlsbad Climate Zone: 7 Front Orientation:· Number of Stories: 0 deg (N) Number of Zones: Number of Occupancies: ZONE INFORMATION Zone Name AHU/1 AHU/2 AHU/3 AHU/4 AHU/5 AHU/8A AHU/8B AHU/9 AHU/10 AHU/11 AHU/12 AHU/13 AHU/14 AHU/15 AHU/7 Floor Area (sqft) 2500 1823 500 780 1216 2770 1120 1213 1702 5340 1420 1620 2280 1256 5100 1. 15 3 Display Perim. (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Inst Tailored LPD Lighting (w/sf) (watts) 0.00 0 .. 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Process Loads (w/sf) 12 7 32 24 12 7 14 14 7 0 0 0 0 11 35 Tailored Vent. (y/n) y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y -PERFORMANCE CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE (part 3 of 3) PERF-1 page 5 of 34 Run Initiation Time: 13: 0: 4 Runcode: 2984-647194624 Project Name: LUCENT TITANIA Documentation: ENERGY CONSULTING GROUP Date: 4/19/1999 COMPLY 24 User 2984 The documentation preparer hereby certifies that the documentation is accurate and complete. DOCUMENTATION AUTHOR GREG DAVIS (619) 268-0660 EXCEPTIONAL CONDITIONS COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST The local enforcement agency should pay special attention to the items specified in this checklist. These items require special written justification and documentation, and special verification to be used with the performance approach. The local enforcement agency determines the adequacy of the justification, and may reject a building or design that otherwise complies based on the adequacy of the special justification and documentation submitted. AHU/1 AHU/1 AHU/2 AHU/2 AHU/2 AHU/3 AHU/3 AHU/4 AHU/4 AHU/5 AHU/5 AHU/5 AHU/8A AHU/8A AHU/8A AHU/8B AHU/8B AHU/8B AHU/9 AHU/9 AHU/9 AHU/10 AHU/10 AHU/10 AHU/11 AHU/12 AHU/13 AHU/14 AHU/14 AHU/15 AHU/15 AHU/15 AHU/7 AHU/7 AHU/7 12.00 w/sf Process Load has been Input (See MECH-5) Tailored Ventilation has been Selected (See MECH~S) Occupancy type of Precision Industrial has been select 7.00 w/sf Process Load has been Inpvt (See MECH-5) Tailored Ventilation has been Selected (See MECH-5) 32.00 w/sf Process Load has been Input (See MECH-5) Tailored Ventilation has been Selected (See MECH-5) 24.00 ·w/sf Process Load has been Input (See MECH-5) Tailored Ventilation has been Selected (See MECH-5) Occupancy type of Precision Industrial has been select 12.00 w/sf Process Load has been Input (See MECH-5) Tailored Ventilation has been Selected (See MECH-5) Occupancy type of Precision Industrial has been select 6.50 w/sf Process Load has been Input (See MECH-5) Tailored Ventilation has been Selected (See MECH-5) Occupancy type of Precision Industrial has been select 13.50 w/sf Process Load has been Input (See MECH-5) Tailored Ventilation has been Selected (See MECH-5) Occup~ncy type of Precision Industrial has been sele~t 14.00 w/sf Process Load has been Input (See MECH-5) Tailored Ventilation has. been Selected (See MECH-5) Occupancy type of Precision Industrial has been select 7.00 w/sf Process Load has been Input (See MECH-5) Tailored Ventilation has been Selected (See MECH-5) Tailored Ventilation has been Selected (See MECH-5) Tailored Ventilation has been Selected (See MECH-5) Tailored Ventilation has been Selected (See MECH-5) Occupancy type of Precision Industrial has been select Tailored Ventilation has been ·selected (See MECH-5) Occupancy type of Precision Industrial has been select 11.00 w/sf Process Load has been Input (See MECH-5) Tailored Ventilation has been Selected (See MECH-5) Occupancy type of Precision Industrial has been select 35.00 w/sf Process Load has been Input (See MECH-5) Tailored Ventilation has been Selected (See MECH-5) Chilled Water Pump: A Variable Speed Pump has been Selected ·Hot Water Pump: A Variable Speed Pump has been Selected BUILDING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL OF EXCEPTIONAL FEATURES JUSTIFICATION: The exceptional features listed in this performance approach application have specifically been reviewed. Adequate written justification and documentation for their use have been provided by the applicant. authorized signature or stamp . ---------------------- ·CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE -Envelope Run Initiation Time: 13: 0: 4 Project Name: LUCENT TITANIA Documentation: ENERGY CONSULTING GROUP Const OPAQUE SURFACES Assembly Name Type Location/Comments 8 11 TILT UP None R-19 Roof (R.19.2x8.16) Wood FENESTRATION Frame Orient Panes Type Exterior Shade ----------------------------------------- Left ( E) 1 Metal None Back ( s) 1 Metal None Right (W) 1 Metal None OH N N N ENV-1 page 6 of 34 Runcode: 2984-647194624 Date: 4/19/1999 COMPLY 24 User 2984 Glazing Type Note to Field ----------------------- Single Clear Default (R) Single Clear Default(R) Single Clear Default(R) -CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE -Mechanical (part 1 of 5) MECH-1 page 7 of 34 Run Initiation Time: 13: 0: 4 Runcode: 2984-647194624 Project Name: LUCENT TITANIA Documentation: ENERGY CONSULTING GROUP Date: 4/19/1999 COMPLY 24 User 2984 SYSTEM FEATURES Zone Name Time Control Setback Control #0f Isolation Zones HP Thermostat Electric Heat Fan Control VAV Min Position Simul. Heat/Cool Heat Supply Reset Cool Supply Reset Ventilation OA Damper Control Economizer Type Outdoor Air CFM Heat Equip Type Make & Model No. Cool Equip Type Make and Model Zone Name Time Control Setback Control #of Isolation Zones HP Thermostat Electric Heat Fan Control VAV Min Position Simul. Heat/Cool Heat Supply Reset Cool Supply Reset Ventilation OA Damper Control Economizer Type Outdoor Air CFM Heat Equip Type Make & Model No. Cool Equip Type Make and Model Code Tables Time Control S:Prog Switch O:Occ Sensor M:Man Timer AHU/1 AHU/2 Setback Setback n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Constant Volume Constant Volume n/a n/a n/a n/a Constant Temp Constant Temp OA Reset OA Reset Diff. Enth (Integrated) No Economizer 6000 800 Hot Water AHU/1 Chilled Water AHU/3 Setback n/a n/a n/a Constant Volume n/a n/a Constant Temp OA Reset Hot Water AHU/2 Chilled Water AHU/4 Setback n/a n/a n/a Constant Volume n/a ·n;a Constant Temp OA Reset Diff. Enth (Integrated) Diff. Enth (Integrated) 3000 3299 Hot Water AHU/3 Chilled Water Ventilation B:Air Balance C:OA Cert. M:OA Measure D:Demand Cont Hot Water AHU/4 Chilled Water OA Damper A:Auto· G:Gravity Note to Field -CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE -Mechanical _(part 2 of 5) MECH-1 page 8 of 34 Run Initiation Time: 13: 0: 4 Runcode: 2984-647194624 Project Name: LUCENT TITANIA Documentation: ENERGY CONSULTING GROUP Date: 4/19/1999 COMPLY 24 User 2984 SYSTEM FEATURES zone Name Time· Control Setback Control #of Isolation Zones HP Thermostat Electric Heat Fan Control VAV Min Position Simul: Heat/Cool Heat Supply Reset Cool Supply Reset Ventilation OA Damper Control Economizer Type outdoor Air CFM Heat Equip Type Make & Model No. Cool Equip Type Make and Model Zone Name Time Control Setback Control #of Isolation Zones HP Thermostat Electric Heat Fan Control VAV Min Position Simul. Heat/Cool Heat Supply Reset Cool Supply Reset Ventilation OA Damper Control Economizer Type Outdoor Air CFM Heat Equip Type Make & Model No. Cool Equip Type Make and Model Code Tables Time Control S:Prog Switch O:Occ Sensor M:Man Timer AHU/5 Setback n/a n/a n/a Constant Volume n/a n/a Constant Temp OA Reset No Economizer 900 Hot Water AHU/5 Chilled Water AHU/8B Setback n/a n/a n/a Constant Volume n/a n/a Constant Temp· OA Reset No Economizer 700 Hot Water AHU/8B Chilled Water Ventilation B:Air Balance C:OA Cert. M:OA Measure D:Demand Cont AHU/8A Setback n/a n/a n/a Constant Volume n/a n/a Constant Temp OA Reset No Economizer 900 Hot Water AHU/8A Chilled Water AHU/9 Setback n/a riia n/a Constant Volume. n/a n/a Constant Temp OA Reset No Economizer 700 Hot Water AHU/9 Chilled Water OA Damper A:Auto G:Gravity Note to Field. ·CERTifICATE OF COMPLIANCE -Mechanical (part 3 of 5) MECH-1 page 9. of 34 Run Initiation· Time: 13: 0: 4 Runcode: 2984-647194624 Project Name: LUCENT TITANIA Documentation: ENERGY CONSULTING GROUP Date: 4/19/1999 COMPLY 24 User 2984 SYSTEM FEATURES Zone Name Time CoI1,trol Setback Control ~of Isolation Zones HP Thermostat El_ectric Heat Fan Control VAV·Min Position Simul. Heat/Cool Heat Supply Reset Cool Supply Reset Ventilation OA Damper Control Economizer Type Outdoor Air CFM Heat Equip Type Make & Model No. Cool Equip Type Make and Model Zone Name Time Control Setback Control #of Isolation Zones HP Thermostat Electric Heat Fan Control· VAV Min Position Simul. Heat/Cool Heat Supply Reset Cool Supply Reset Ventilation OA Damper Control Economizer Type outdoor Air CFM Heat Equip Type Make & Model No. Cool Equip Type Make and Model Code Tables Time Control S:Prog Switch O:Occ Sensor M:Man Timer AHU/10 Setback n/a n/a n/a Constant Volume n/a .n/a Constant Temp OA Reset No Economizer 300 Hot Water AHU/10 Chilled Water AHU/12 Setback n/a n/a n/a Constant Volume n/a n/a Constant Temp OA Reset No Economizer 250 Hot Water AHU/12 Chilled Water Ventilation B:Air Balance C:OA Cert. M:OA Measure D:Demand Cont AHU/11 Setback n/a n/a n/a Constant Volume n/a n/a Constant Temp OA Reset No Economizer 700 Hot Water AHU/11 Chilled Water AHU/13 Setback n/a n/a n/a Constant Volume n/a n/a Constant Temp OA Reset No Economizer 250 Hot Water AHU/13 Chilled Water OA Damper A:Auto G:Gravity Note to Field -CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE -Mechanical (part 4 of 5) MECH-1 page 10 of 34 Run Initiation Time: 13: 0: 4 Runcode: 2984-647194624 Project Name: LUCENT TITANIA Documentation: ENERGY CONSULTING GROUP Date: 4/19/1999 COMPLY 24 User 2984 SYSTEM FEATURES Zone Name Time Control Setback Control #of Isolation Zones HP Thermostat Electric Heat Fan Control VAV Min Position Simul. Heat/Cool Heat Supply Reset Cool Supply Reset Ventilation OA Damper Control Economizer Type Outdoor Air CFM Heat Equip Type Make & Model No. Cool Equip Type Make and Model · Zone Name Time Control Setback Control #of Isolation Zones HP Thermostat Electric Heat Fan Control VAV Min Position Simul. Heat/Cool Heat Supply Reset Cool Supply Reset Ventilation OA Damper Control Economizer .Type Outdoor Air CFM Heat Equip Type Make & Model No. Cool Equip Type ·Make and Model Code Tables Time Control S:Prog Switch O:Occ Sensor M:Man Timer AHU/14 Setback n/a n/a n/a Constant Volume n/a n/a Constant Temp OA Reset No Economizer 251 Hot Water AHU/14 Chilled Water AHU/7 Setback n/a n/a n/a Constant Volume n/a n/a Constant Temp OA Reset No Economizer 4250 Hot Water AHU/7 Chilled Water Ventilation B:Air Balance C:OA Cert. M:OA Measure D:Demand Cont AHU/15 Setback n/a n/a n/a Constant Volume n/a n/a Constant Temp OA Reset No Economizer 700 Hot Water AHU/15 Chilled Water OA Damper A:Auto G:Gravity Note to Field -CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE -Mechanical (part 5 of 5) MECH-1 page 11 of 34 Run Initiation Time: 13: 0: 4 Runcode: 2984-647194624 Project Name: LUCENT TITANIA Documentation: ENERGY CONSULTING GROUP DUCT INSULATION System Name AHU/1 AHU/2 AHU/3 AHU/4 AHU/5 AHU/8A AHU/8B AHU/9 AHU/10 AHU/11 AHU/12 AHU/13 AHU/14 AHU/15 AHU/7 Type Duct Location Heating Ducts in Attic Cooling Ducts in Attic Heating_Ducts in Attic Cooling Ducts in Attic Heating Ducts in Attic Cooling Ducts in Attic Heating Ducts in Attic Cooling Ducts in Attic Heating Ducts in Attic Cooling Ducts in Attic Heating Ducts in Attic Cooling Ducts in Attic Heating Ducts in Attic Cooling Ducts in Attic Heating Ducts in Attic Coolin·g Ducts in Attic Heating Ducts in Attic Cooling Ducts in Attic Heating·Ducts in Attic Cooling Ducts in Attic Heating Ducts in Attic Cooling Ducts in Attic Heating Ducts in Attic Cooling Ducts in Attic Heating Ducts in Attic Cooling Ducts in Attic Heating Duct~ in Attic Cooling Ducts in Attic Heating Ducts in Attic Cooling Ducts in Attic PIPE INSULATION Insul ·System Name Pipe Type Required Domestic Hot·water AHU/1 AHU/2 AHU/3 AHU/4 AHU/5 AHU/8A AHU/8B AHU/9 AHU/10 AHU/11 AHU/12 AHU/13 y I N Y I N Y I N Y I N y I N Y I N y I N Y I N y I N Y I N y I N y I N y I N Date: 4/19/1999 COMPLY 24 User 2984 Duct Tape Insul Note to Allowed R-Val Field y I N Y I N y I N Y I N y I N y I N y I N y I N Y I N y I N y I N y I N Y I N Y I N Y I N y I N Y I N y IN Y I N Y I N Y I N Y I N y I N Y I N y I N y I N y I N Y I N y I N· y-I N 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 Note to Field No Fan Type Motor Location CFM BHP Eff Eff CFM BHP Eff Eff :t;:-":·'·-.,··. -~ --------------------------------------------------- Constant Volume Draw-Through 6000 4.30 82 100 None 2 Constant Volume Draw-Through 3000 2.50 80 100 None 3 Constant Volume Draw-Through 3000 2.50 80 100 None 4 Constant Volume Draw-Through 3300 3.20 81-100 None 5 Constant Volume Draw-Through 4000 3.50 81 100 None 6 Constant Volume Draw-Through 4000 3.50 81 100 None 7 Constant Volume Draw-Through 3000 2.50 80 100 None 8 Constant Volume Draw-Through 3000 2.50 80 100 None 9 Constant Volume Draw-Through 3000 2.50· 80 100 None 10 Constant Volume Draw-Through 3845 3.50 81 100 None 11 Constant Volume Draw-Through 1245 1.10 79 100 None 12 Constant Volume Draw-Through 1200 1.10 79 100 None 13 Constant Volume Draw-Through 1200 1.10 79 100 None 14 Constant Volume Draw-Through 3000 2.50 8n 100 None 15 Constant Volume Draw-Through 30000 25.30 88 100 None ZONAL FAN SUMMARY ---------Zonal Fan ------------Exhaust Fan ----- Mtr Drv Mtr Drv Zone Name No CFM BHP Eff Eff No. CFM BHP Eff Eff ----------------------------------------------- None BOILER SUMMARY AFUE /Rec Rated Stdby Volume System Name System Type Eff Input Loss EF (gals) ------------------------------------------------------- Undefined DomesticHW 0.780 40000 0.040 0.530 50 TELEDYNE LAARS HHO775M Hydronic 0.000 775000 0.000 0.800 0 AHU/14 -AHU/15 AHU/7 Y I N Y I N Y I N NOTES TO FIELD -For Building Department Use Only _____________________________________________________________________ J ____ _ · ENVELOPE COMPLIANCE SUMMARY -Performance (part 1 of 3)ENV-2 page 12 of 34 Run Initiation Time: 13: 0: 4 Runcode: 2984-647194624 Project Name: LUCENT TITANIA Documentation: ENERGY CONSULTING GROUP GENERAL INFORMATION BY ZONE Zone Name Occupancy --------------------------------------------- AHU/1 Office AHU/2 Precision Industrial AHU/3 Office AHU/4 Office AHU/5 Precision Industrial AHU/8A Precision Industrial AHU/8B Precision Industrial AHU/9 Precision Industrial AHU/10 Precision Industrial AHU/11 Corridor/Restroom AHU/12 Corridor/Restroom AHU/13 Corridor/Restroom AHU/14 Precision Industrial AHU/15 Precision Industrial AHU/7 Precision Industrial Total Flr No 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Date: 4/19/1999 COMPLY 24 Uset 2984 Floor Display Area Volume Perim. ------------------ 2500 27500 0 1823 2no53 0 500 5500 0 780 8580 0 1216 13376 0 . 2770 30470 0 1120 12320 0 1213 13343 0 1702 18722 0 5340 58740 0 1420 15620 0 1620 17820 0 2280 25080 0 1256 13816 0 5100 56100 0 ----- 30640 ·ENVELOPE COMPLIANCE SUMMARY -Performance (part 2 of 3)ENV-2 page 13 of 34 Run Initiation Time: 13: O: 4 Runcode: 2984-647194624 Project Name: LUCENT TITANIA Documentation: ENERGY CONSULTING GROUP OPAQUE SURFACES Act Solar Type Area U-Val Azm Tilt Gains Form 3 Reference Wall Roof Roof Roof Roof Roof Roof Roof Roof Roof Wall Roof Roof Wall Roof Wall Wall Roof Roof Roof 88 2500 1823 500 780 1216 2770 1120 1213 1702 2136 5340 1420 270 1620 243 243 2280 1256 -5100 0.671 0.049 0.049 0.049 0.049 0.049 0.049 0.049 0.049 0.049 0.671 0.049 0.049 0.671 0. 0·49 0.671 0.671 0.049 0.049 0.049 90 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 270 0 0 90 0 90 180 0 0 0 90 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 90 22 22 90 22 90 90 22 22 22 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes. Yes 8 11 TILT UP R-19 Roof (R.19.2x8.16) R-19 Roof (R.19.2x8.16) R-19 Roof (R.19.2x8.16) R-19 Roof (R.19.2x8.16) R-19 Roof (R.19.2x8.16) R-19 Roof (R.19.2x8.16) R-19 Roof (R.19.2x8.16) R-19 Roof (R.19.2x8.16) R-19 Roof (R.19.2x8.16) 8 11 TILT UP R-19 Roof (R.19.2x8.16) R-19 Roof (R.19.2x8.16) 8" TILT UP R-19 Roof (R.19.2x8.16) 8 11 TILT UP 8" TILT UP R-19 Roof (R.19.2x8.16) R-19 Roof (R.19.2x8.16) R-19 Roof (R.19.2x8.16) Date: 4/19/1999 COMPLY 24 User 2984 Location/Comments AHU/1 AHU/1 AHU/2 AHU/3 AHU/4 AHU/5 AHU/8A AHU/8B AHU/9 AHU/10 AHU/11 AHU/11 AHU/12 AHU/13 AHU/13 AHU/14 AHU/14 AHU/14 AHU/15 AHU/7 -ENVELOPE COMPLIANCE SUMMARY -Performance (part 3 of 3)ENV-2 page 14 of 34 Run Initiation Time: 13: 0: 4 Runcode: 2984-647194624 Project Name: LUCENT TITANIA Documentation: ENERGY CONSULTING GROUP FENESTRATION SURFACES # Type Area Frame Div U-Val ---------------------------- 1 Wdw Right (W) 54.0 Metal No 1.19 2 Wdw Left (E) 27.0 Metal No 1. 19 3 Wdw Back (S) 27.n Metal No 1.19 OVERHANGS/SIDE FINS Act Azm Tilt 270 · 90 90 90 180 90 SC Glass Only ----- 1. 00 1.00 1.00 Date: 4/19/1999 COMPLY 24 User 2984 Location/Comments --------------------- AHU/11 AHU/14 AHU/14 --Window-------Overhang---------Left Fin------Right Fin-- # Type Ht Wd Len Ht LExt RExt Dist Len Ht Dist Len Ht ·MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT ZONING SUMMARY -Performance Run Initiation Time: 13: 0: 4 Project Name: LUCENT TITANIA Documentation: ENERGY CONSULTING GROUP SYSTEM/ZONING SUMMARY System/Zones Served Central/Zonal System -------------------------------------------------- AHU/1 AHU/1 AHU/1 AHU/2 AHU/2 AHU/2 AHU/3 AHU/3 AHU/3 AHU/4 AHU/4 AHU/4 AHU/5 AHU/5 AHU/5 AHU/8A AHU/8A AHU/8A AHU/8B AHU/8B AHU/8B AHU/9 AHU/9 AHU/9 AHU/10 AHU/10 AHU/10 AHU/11 AHU/11 AHU/11 AHU/12 AHU/12 AHU/12 AHU/13 AHU/13 AHU/13 AHU/14 AHU/14 AHU/14 AHU/15 AHU/15 AHU/15 AHU/7 AHU/7 AHU/7 MECH-2 page 15 of 34 Runcode: 2984-647194624 Da t.e : 4 / 19 / 19 9 9 COMPLY 24 User 2984 No System Type Sys ---------------- Built-Up sz 1 Built-Up sz 1 Built-Up sz 1 Built-Up sz 1 Built-Up sz 1 Built-Up sz 1 Built-Up sz 1 Built-Up sz 1 Built-Up sz 1 Built-Up sz 1 Built:_Up sz 1 Built-Up sz 1 Built-Up sz 1 Built-Up sz 1 Built-Up sz 1 -MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SUMMARY -Performance Run Initiation Time: 13: 0: 4 Project Name: LUCENT TITANIA Documentation: ENERGY CONSULTING GROUP CHILLER & TOWER SUMMARY MECH-3 page 16 of 34 Runcode: 2984-647194624 Date: 4/19/1999 COMPLY 24 User 2984 Fuel Elec Total Input Input Output Equipment Name Equipment.Type Qty CFC (KBtu) (KW) (tons) ----------------------------------------------------------- 168.8 TON SCREW CHILLER Screw Chiller 1 y 0.0 162.3 168.8 CENTRAL SYSTEM SUMMARY Sys No No System Name System Type Sys Economizer Type ----------------------------------------------------------------- 1 AHU/1 Built-Up sz 1 Diff. Enth (Integrated) 2 AHU/2 Built-Up sz 1 No Economizer 3 AHU/3 Built-Up sz 1 Diff. Enth (Integrated) 4 AHU/4 Built-Up sz 1 Diff. Enth ( Integrated) 5 AHU/5 Built-Up sz 1 No Economizer 6 AHU/8A Built-Up sz 1 No Economizer 7 AHU/8B Built-Up sz 1 No Economizer 8 AHU/9 Built-Up sz 1 No Economizer 9 AHU/10 Built-Up sz 1 No Economizer 10 AHU/11 Built-Up sz 1 No Economizer 11 AHU/12 Built-Up .sz 1 No Economizer 12 AHU/13 Built-Up sz 1 No Economizer 13 AHU/14 Built-Up sz 1 No Economizer 14 AHU/15 Built-Up sz 1 No Economizer 15 AHU/7 Built-Up sz 1 No Economizer CENTRAL SYSTEM RATINGS Sys -------Heating ----------------------------------Cooling ----------- No Type Output Aux KW EFF Type .Output Sensible EER SEER --------------------------------------------------------- 1 Hot Water 66000 n/a. n/a Chl Wtr 180000 129600 n/a n/a 2 Hot Water 33000 n/a n/a Chl Wtr 90000 64800 n/a n/a 3 Hot Water 33000 n/a n/a Chl. Wt:r;-90000 64800 n/a n/a 4 Hot Water 36600 n/a n/a Chl Wtr 120000 71300 n/a n/a 5 Hot Water 43200 n/a n/a Chl Wtr 147000 86400 n/a n/a 6 Hot Water 43200 n/a n/a Chl Wtr 120000 86400 n/a n/a 7 Hot Water 33000 n/a n/a Chl Wtr 90000 64800 n/a n/a 8 Hot Water 33000 n/a n/a Chl Wtr 90000 64800 n/a n/a 9 Hot Water 33000 n/a n/a Chl Wtr 90000 64800 n/a n/a 10 Hot Water 41500 n/a n/a Chl Wtr 120000 83050 n/a n/a 11 Hot Water 13200 n/a n/a Chl Wtr 36000 26900 n/a n/a 12 Hot Water 13200 n/a n/a Chl Wtr 36000 25900 n/a n/a 13 Hot Water 13200 n/a n/a Chl Wtr 36000 25900 n/a n/a 14 Hot Water 33000 n/a n/a Chl Wtr 90000 64800. n/a n/a 15 Hot Water 330000 n/a n/a Chl Wtr 861600 709800 n/a n/a CENTRAL FAN SUMMARY ------------Supply Fan -----------Return Fan Sys Mtr Drv Mtr Drv -• • • -· ......... J __ • .,.,,: ' • - ·MECHANICAL VENTILATION -Performance Run Initiation Time: 13: 0: 4 Project Name: LUCENT TITANIA Documentation: ENERGY CONSULTING GROUP VENTILATION SUMMARY BY ZONE Zone Name T Occupancy ------------------------------------- AHU/1 * Office AHU/2 * Precision Indu AHU/3· * Office AHU/4 * Office AHU/5 * Precision Indu AHU/8A * P·recision Indu AHU/SB * Precision Indu AHU/9 * Precision Indu AHU/10 * Precision Indu AHU/11 * Corridor/Restr AHU/12 * Corridor/Restr AHU/13 * Corridor/Restr AHU/14 * Precision Indu AHU/15 * Precision Indu AHU/7 * Precision Indu Floor Area ----- 2500 1823 500 780 1216 2770 1120 1213 1702 5340 1420 1620 2280 1256 5100 sqft /Occ 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 200 200 200 100 100 100 MECH-4 page 17 of 34 Runcode: 2984-647194624 Date: 4/19/1999 COMPLY 24 User 2984 Tran CFM Dsg Min sfer /Occ CFM CFM CFM ------ 240.0 6000 6000 43.9 800 800 600.0 3000 300C 423.0 3299 329·9 74.0 900 900 32.5 900 900 62.5 700 700 57.7 700 700 17.6 300 300 26.2 700 700 35.2 250 250 30.9 250 250 11. 0 251 251 55.7 700 700 83.3 4250 4250 ------ TOTALS 23000 23000 Tailored OA (T=*) requires supporting documentation on MECH-5, Tailored Ventilation and Process Loads Worksheet ·PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ASSEMBLY Project Name: LUCENT TITANIA Document.a tion: ENERGY CONSULTING GROUP ENV-3 page 18 of 34 Date: 4/19/1999 COMPLY 24 User 2984 ' --------------------------------------------------------------------------- COMPONENT DESCRIPTION Sketch of Construction Assembly ASSEMBLY U-VALUE Construction Components Outside Air Film 1. Concrete, 140 lb, Not Dried 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9 . Inside Air Film ADJUSTMENT FOR FRAMING Assembly Name: 8" TILT UP Assembly Type: Wall Assembly Tilt: 90 deg (Vertical) Framing Material: None Framing Spacing: " o.c. Framing Percent: 0.0 % Absorptivity: 0.70 Roughness: Concrete, Asph. Shingles Th Fr (in) 8.000 Unadjusted R-Values R-Value Cavity · Frame 0.17 0.64 0.68 1. 49 0.17 0.64 0.68 1. 49 (1 / 1.49) X (1.00) + (1 / 1.49) X (0.00) = 0.671 Weight: Heat Capacity: 93.3 lb/sqft 18.67 TOTAL U-VALUE = 0.671 ===== TOTAL R-VALUE = 1.49 ===== ·PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ASSEMBLY Project Name: LUCENT TITANIA Documentation: ENERGY CONSULTING GROUP ENV-3 page 19 of 34 Date: 4/19/1999 COMPLY 24 User 2984 I --------------------------------------------------------------------------- COMPONENT DESCRIPTION Sketch of Const~uction Assembly ASSEMBLY U-VALUE Construction Components Outside Air Film 1. Roofing, Built-Up 2. Membrane, Vapor-Permeable Felt 3. Plywood 4. Air Space 5. Insulation, Mineral Fiber, R-19 Assembly Name: R-19 Roof (R.19.2x8.16) Assembly Type: Roof Assembly Tilt: 22 deg (Tilted Up) Framing Material: Wood Framing Spacing: " O. C. Framing Percent: 10.0 % Absorptivity: 0.70 Roughness: Concrete, Asph. Shingles Th Fr (in) 0.375 0.010 0.500 R-Value Cavity 0.17 0.33 0.06 0.62 0.75 Frame 6. Fiber Board, Tile and Lay-in Panels 7 . * 1. 25 0 * 6.000 0.500 19.00 1. 25 0.17 0.33 0. 0·6 0.62 1. 24 5.94 1. 25 ' 8. 9. Inside Air Film Unadjusted R-Values 0.61 22.79 ADJUSTMENT FOR FRAMING (1 /22.79) X (0.90) + (1 /10.22) X (0.10) Weight: Heat Capacity: 6.8 lb/sqft 2.17 = 0.049 TOTAL U-VALUE = TOTAL R-VALUE = 0.61 10.22 0.049 ===== 20.29 ===== · ZONE HEATING & COOLING LOAD SUMMARY Project Name: LUCENT TITANIA Documentation: ENERGY CONSULTING GROUP page 20 of 34 Date: 4/19/1999 COMPLY 24 User 2984 ' --------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY OF PEAK HOUR ZONE Name: DESIGN CONDITIONS -------------------- Peak Ho'.:r: Indoor Conditions: outdoor Conditions: LOAD COMPONENT -------------------~- Wall Conduction Window Conduction Door Conduction Roof Conduction Skylight Conduction Floor Conduction S-lab Conduction Interior Conduction Infiltration Solar Gain Lighting Receptacle Process Occupants Heating AirFlow: Cooling AirFlow:· LOADS FOR ZONE AHU/1 COOLING HEATING SENSIBLE LATENT --------------------- Jan 12am Aug 3pm 70 F DB 72 F DB 50 9,,: 0 RH 38 F DB 83 F DB 68 F WB Quantity Btu/hr Btu/hr Btu/hr --------------------------------- 88.0 sqft 1890 1255 0.0 sqft 0 0 0.0 sqft 0 0 2500.0 sqft 3942 4976 0.0 sqft 0 0 0.0 sqft 0 0 o ._o sqft 0 0 0.0 sqft 0 0 0.0 AC/hr 0 0 0.0 sqft 0 0 0.0 watts-0 1706 3750.0 watts 0 12799 30000.0 watts 0 102390 25.0 occs 0 6375 5125 --------------------- ZONE LOADS 5832 129501 5125 5832 Btu/hr/ [1.08 x 129501 -Btu/hr/ [1.08 x 35 F DeltaT)] = 17 F DeltaT)] = 155 cfm 7065 cfm ·ZONE HEATING & COOLING LOAD SUMMARY Project Name: LUCENT TITANIA. Documentation: ENERGY CONSULTING GROUP page 21 of 34 Date: 4/19/1999 COMPLY 24 User 2984 . . ' ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY OF PEAK HOUR LOADS FOR ZONE ZONE Name: DESIGN CONDITIONS -------------------- Peak Hour: Indoor Conditions: Outdoor Conditions: LOAD.COMPONENT --------------------- Wall Conduction Window Conduction Door Conduction Roof Conduction Skylight Conduction Floor Conduction Slab Conduction Interior Conduction Infiltration Solar Gain Lighting Receptacle Process Occupants Heating AirFlow: Cooling AirFlow: AHU/2 COOLING HEATING SENSIBLE LATENT --------------------- Jan 12am Aug 3pm 70 F DB 72 F DB 50 9-< 0 RH 38 F DB 83 F DB 68 F WB Quantity Btu/hr Btu/hr Btu/hr --------------------------------- 0.0 sqft 0 0 .o. 0 sqft 0 0 0.0 sqft 0 0 1823.0 sqft 2875 3639 0.0 sqft 0 0 0.0 sqft 0 0 0.0 sqft 0 0 0. 0 sqft 0 0 0. 0 AC/hr 0 0 0.0 sqft 0 0 0.0 watts 0 1244 2734.5 watts 0 9333 12761. 0 watts 0 43553 18.2 occs 0 4649 3737 --------------------- ZONE LOADS. 2875 62418 3737 2875 Btu/hr/ [1.08 x 62418 Btu/hr/ [1.08 x 35 F DeltaT)] = 17 F DeltaT)] = 76 cfm 3405 cfm ·ZONE HEATING & COOLING LOAD SUMMARY Project Name: LUCENT TITANIA Documentation: ENERGY CONSULTING· GROUP page 22 of 34 Date: 4/19/1999 COMPLY 24 User 2984 I --------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY OF PEAK HOUR ZONE Name: DESIGN CONDITIONS -------------------- Peak Hour: Indoor Conditions: Outdoor Conditions: LOAD COMPONENT --------------------- Wall Conduct'ion Window Conduction Door Conduction ·Roof Conduction Skylight Conduction Floor Conduction Slab Conduction Interior Conduction Infiltration Solar Gain Lighting Receptacle Process Occupants Heating AirFlow: Cooling AirFlow: LOADS FOR ZONE AHU/3 COOLING HEATING SENSIBLE LATENT --------------------- Jan 12am Aug 3pm 70 F DB 72 F DB 50 ~ 0 RH 38 F DB 83 F DB 68 F WB Quantity Btu/hr Btu/hr Btu/hr --------------------------------- 0.0 sqft 0 0 0.0 sqft 0 0 0.0 sqft 0 0 500 .. 0 sqft 788 998 0.0 sqft 0 0 0. 0 sqft . 0 . 0 0.0 sqft 0 0 0.0 sqft 0 0 0.0 AC/hr 0 0 0.0 sqft 0 0 0.0 watts 0 _341 750.0 watts 0 2560 16000.0 watts 0 54608 5.0 occs 0 1275 1025 --------------------- ZONE LOADS 788 59782 1025 788 Btu/hr/ [1.08 x 59782 Btu/hr/ [1.08 x 35 F DeltaT)] = 17 F DeltaT)] = 21 cfm 3261 cfm ·ZONE HEATING & COOLING LOAD SUMMARY Project Name: LUCENT TITANIA Documentation: ENERGY CONSULTING GROUP page 23 of 34 Date: 4/19/1999 COMPLY 24 User 2984 ' --------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY OF PEAK HOUR ZONE Name: DESIGN CONDITIONS -------------------- Peak Hour: Indoor.Conditions: Outdoor Conditions: LOAD COMPONENT --------------------- Wall conduction Window Conduction Door Conduction Roof Conduction Skylight Conduction Floor Conduction Slab Conduction Interior Conduction Infiltration Solar Gain Lighting Receptacle Process Occupant~ Heating AirFlow: Cooling AirFlow: LOADS FOR ZONE AHU/4 COOLING HEATING SENSIBLE LATENT --------------------- Jan 12am Aug 3pm 70 F DB 72 F DB 50 .:k 0 RH 38 F DB 83 F DB 68 F WB Quantity Btu/hr Btu/hr Btu/hr --------------------------------- 0.0 sqft 0 0 0.0 sqft 0 0 0.0 sqft 0 0 780.0 sqft 1230 1557 0.0 sqft 0 0 0.0 sqft 0 0 0.0 sqft 0 0 0.0 sqft 0 0 0.0 AC/hr 0 0 0.0 sqf~ ·o 0 0.0 watts 0 532 1170.0 watts 0 3993 18720.0 watts o· 63891 7.8 occs 0 1989 1599 ----.----------------- ZONE LOADS 1230 71963 1599 1230 Btu/hr/ [1.08 x 71963 Btu/hr/ [1.08 x 35 F DeltaT)] = 17 F DeltaT)] = 33 cfm 3926 cfm · ZONE HEATING & COOLING LOAD SUMMARY Project Name: LUCENT TITANIA Documentation: ENERGY CONSULTING GROUP I - page 24 of 34 Date: 4/19/1999 COMPLY 24 User 2984 ' --------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY OF PEAK HOUR LOADS. FOR ZONE ZONE Na:ine: DESIGN CONDITIONS -. ------- Peak Hour: Indoor Conditions: Outdoor Conditions:. LOAD COMPONENT Wall Conduction Window Conduction Door Conduction Roof Conduction Skylight Conduction Floor Conduction Slab Conduction Interior Conduction Infiltration Solar Gain Lighting Receptacle Process Occupants Quantity ------------ 0.0 sqft 0.0 sqft 0.0 s_qft 1216.0 sqft 0.0 sqft 0.0 sqft 0.0 sqft 0.0 sqft 0.0 AC/hr 0.0 sqft 0.0 watts 1824.0 watts 14592.0 watts 12.2 occs ·zoNE LOADS AHU/5 COOLING HEATING SENSIBLE LATENT --------------------- Jan 12am Aug 3pm 70 F DB 72 F DB 50 9,,: 0 RH 38 F DB 83 F DB 68 F WB Btu/hr Btu/hr Btu/hr ------·--------------- 0 0 0 0 ·O 0 1918 2427 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 830 0 6225 0 49802 0 3101 2493 --------------------- 1918 62386 2493 Heating Air-Flow: Cooling AirFlow: 1918 Btu/hr/ [1.08 x 62386 Btu/hr/ [1.08 x 35 F DeltaT)] == 17 F DeltaT)] = 51 cfm 3403 cfm · ZONE H_EATING & COOLING LOAD SUMMARY Project Name: LUCENT TITANIA Documentation: ENERGY CONSULTING GROUP page 25 of 34 Date: 4/19/1999 COMPLY 24 User 2984 ---------------------------------------------------------------------, ____ _ SUMMARY OF PEAK HOUR LOADS FOR ZONE ZONE Name: DESIGN CONDITIONS Peak Hour: Indoor Conditions: Outdoor Conditions: LOAD COMPONENT Wall Conduction Window Conduction Door Conduction Roof Conduction Skylight Conduction Floor Conduction Slab Conduction Interior Conduction Infiltration Solar Gain Lighting Receptacle Process Occupants Quantity 0.0 sqft 0.0 sqft 0.0 sqft 2770.0 sqft 0.0 sqft 0.0 sqft 0.0 sqft 0.0 sqft 0.0 AC/hr 0.0 sqft 0.0 watts 4155.0 watts 18005.0 watts 27.7 occs ZONE LOADS AHU/8A COOLING HEATING SENSIBLE LATENT Jan 12am 70 F DB 38 F DB Btu/hr 0 0 0 4368 0 0 ·o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4368 Aug 3pm 72 F DB 83 F DB 50 % RH 68 F WB Btu/hr Btu/hr 0 0. 0 5529 0 0 0 0 0 0 1890 14181 61451 7063 90115 5679 5678 Heating AirFlow: Cooling AirFlow: 4368 Btu/hr/ [1.08 x 90115 Btu/hr/ [1.08 x 35 F DeltaT)] = 17 F DeltaT)] = 116 cfm 4916 cfm ·ZONE HEArING & COOLING LOAD SUMMARY Project Name: LUCENT TITANIA Documentation: ENERGY CONSULTING GROUP page 26.of 34 Date: 4/19/1999 COMPLY 24 User 2984 • I --------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY OF PEAK HOUR LOADS FOR ZONE ZONE Name: DESIGN CONDITIONS -------------------- Peak Hour: Indoor Conditions: Outdoor Conditions: LOAD COMPONENT -----,------------. ---- wa:11 Conduction Window Conduction Door Conduction Roof Conduction Skylight Conduction Floor Conduction Slab Conduction Interior Conduction Infiltration Solar Gain Lighting Receptacle Process Occupants Heating AirFlow: Cooling AirFlow: AHU/8B COOLING HEATING SENSIBLE LATENT --------------------- Jan 12am Aug. 3pm 70 F DB. 72 F DB 50 51< 0 RH 38 F DB 83 F DB 68 F WB Quantity Btu/hr Btu/hr Btu/hr --------------------------------- 0.0 sq.ft 0 0 o·. o sqft 0 0 0.0 sqft 0 0 1120.0 sqft 1766 2236 0.0 sqft 0 0 0.0 sqft 0 0 0.0 sqft 0 0 0.0 sqft 0 0 0. ,0 AC/hr 0 0 0.0 sqft 0 0 0.0 watts 0 764 1680.0 watts 0 5734 15120.0 watts 0 51605 11. 2 occs 0 2856 2296 --------------------- ZONE LOADS 1766 63194 2296 1766 Btu/hr/ [1.08 x 63194 Btu/hr/ [1.08 x 35 F DeltaT)] = 17 F DeltaT)] = 47 cfm 3448 cfm ·ZONE HEATING & COOLING LOAD SUMMARY page 27 of 34 Project Name: LUCENT TITANIA -Documentation: ENERGY CONSULTING GROUP Date: 4/19/1999 COMPLY 24 User 2984 ' --------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY OF PEAK HOUR LOADS FOR ZONE ZONE Name: DESIGN CONDITIONS Peak Hour: Indoor Conditions: Outdoor Conditions: LOAD COMPONENT Wal_l Conduction Window Conduction Door Conduction Roof Conduction Skylight Conduc·tion Floor Conduction Slab Conduction Interior Conduction Infiltration Solar Gain Lighting· . Receptacle Process . Occupants Quantity 0.0 sqft 0.0 sqft 0.0 sqft 1213.0 sqft 0.0· sqft 0.0 sqft 0.0 sqft 0.0 sqft 0.0 AC/hr 0.0 sqft 0.0 watts 1819.5 watts 16982.0 watts 12. 1-occs AHU/9 HEATING Jan 12am 70 F DB 38 F DB Btu/hr 0 0 0 1913 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ZONE LOADS 1913 COOLING SENSIBLE LATENT -------------- Aug -3pm 72 F DB 50 9-:: 0 RH 83 F DB 68 F WB Btu/hr Btu/hr -------------- 0 0 0 2421 0 0 0 0 0 0 828 6210 57960 3093 2487 -------------- 70512 2487 He-ating AirFlow: Cooling AirFlow: ·1913 Btu/hr/ [1.08 x 70512 Btu/hr/ [1.08 x 35 F DeltaT)] = 17 F DeltaT)] = 51 cfm 3847 cfm . . . . ,. ·-·--. . .. . . . . -··· -' ·ZONE HEATING & COOLING LOAD SUMMARY Project Name: LUCENT TITANIA Documentation: ENERGY CONSULTING GROUP page 28 of 34 Date: 4/19/1999 COMPLY 24 User 2984 ---------------------------·-----------------------------------------'----- SUMMARY OF PEAK HOUR LOADS FOR ZONE ZONE Name: DESIGN CONDITIONS Peak Hour: Indoor Conditions: - Outdoor Conditions~ LOAD COMPONENT Wall Conduction Window Conduction Door Conduction Roof Conduction Skylight Conduction Floor Conduct'ion Slab Conduction Interior Conduction Infiltration Solar Ga-in Lighting Receptacle Process Occupants Quantity 0.0 sqft 0.0 sqft 0.0 sqft 1702.0 sqft 0.0 sqft 0. O s·qft 0.0 sqft 0.0 sqft 0.0 AC/hr 0.0 sqft 0.0 watts 2553:0 watts 11914.0 watts 17.0 occs ZONE LOADS AHU/10 COOLING HEATING SENSIBLE LATENT Jan 12am 70 F ·DB 38 F DB Btu/hr 0 0 0 2684 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2684 Aug 3pm 72 F DB 83 F DB 50 % RH 68 F WB Btu/hr Btu/hr 0 0 0 3397 0 0 0 0 0 0 1162 8713 .40662 4340 5·827 5 3489 3489 Heating AirFlow: Cooling AirFlow: 2684 Btu/hr/ [1.08 x 58275 Btu/hr/_ [1.08 x 35 F Delta'I')] == 17 F DeltaT)] == 71 _cfm 3179 cfm -ZONE HEATING & COOLING LOAD SUMMARY Project Name: LUCENT TITANIA Documentation: ENERGY CONSULTING GROUP page 29 of 34 Date: 4/19/1999 COMPLY 24 User 2984 ---------------------------------------------------------------------'----- SUMMARY OF PEAK HOUR ZONE Name: DESIGN CONDITIONS -------------------- Peak Hour: Indoor Conditions: Outdoor Conditions: LOAD COM.PONENT --------------------- Wall Conduction Window Conduction Door Conduction Roof Conduction Skylight Conduction Floor Conduction Slab Conduct.ion Interior Conduction Infiltration Solar Gain Lighting Receptacle Process .Occupants H~ating AirFlow: Cooling AirFlow: LOADS FOR ZONE AHU/ll COOLING HEATING SENSIBLE LATENT --------------------- Jan 12am Aug 3pm 70 F DB 72 F DB 50 9-c 9 RH 38 F DB 83 F DB 68 F WB Quantity Btu/hr Btu/hr Btu/hr --------------------------------- 2136.0 sqft 45874 19982 54.0 sqft 2056-449 0.0 sqft 0 0 5340.0 sqft 8421 10369 0. 0 sqft 0 0 0.0 sqft 0 0 0.0 sqft 0 0 0.0 sqft 0 0 0.0 AC/b.r 0 0 54.0 sqft 0 4356 0.0 watts 0 3641 8010.0 watts 0 27338 0.0 watts 0 0 26.7 occs 0 6808 5474 --------------------- ZONE LOADS 56351 72944 5474 56351 Btu/hr/ [1.08 x 72944 Btu/hr/ [1.08 x 35 F DeltaT)] = 17 F DeltaT)] = 1493 cfm 3979 cfm .ZONE HEATING & COOLING LOAD SUMMARY Project Name: LUCENT TITANIA Documentation: ENERGY CONSULTING GROUP page 30 of 34 Date: 4/19/1999 COMPLY 24 User 2984 -------.-------------------------------------------------------------'----- SUMMARY OF PEAK HOUR ZONE Name: DESIGN CONDITIONS -------------------- Peak Hour: Indoor Conditions: Outdoor Conditions: LOAD COMPONENT --------------------- Wall Conduction Window ~onduction . Door Conduction Roof Conduction ·skylight Conduction Floor Conduction Slab Conduction Interior-Conduction Infiltration Solar Gain Lighti-ng Receptacle . Process Occupants Heating AirFlow: Cooling AirFlow: LOADS FOR ZONE AHU/12 COOLING HEATING SENSIBLE LATENT --------------------- Jan 12am Aug 3pm 70 F DB 72 F DB 50 ~ 0 RH 38 F DB 83 F DB 68 F WB Quantity Btu/hr Btu/hr Btu/hr --------------------------------- 0.0 sqft 0 0 0.0 sqft 0 0 0.0 sqft 0 0 1420.0 sqft 2239 2834 0.0 sqft 0 0 0. 0 sqft 0 0 0.0 sqft 0 0 0.0 sqft 0 0 0.0 AC/hr 0 0 0.0 sqft 0 0 0.0 watts 0 969 2130.0 watts 0 7270 0.0 watts 0 0 7.1 occs 0 1811 1456 --------------------- ZONE LOADS 2239 12884 1456 2239 Btu/hr/ [1.08 x 12884 Btu/hr/ [1.08 x 35 F DeltaT)] = 17 F DeltaT)] = 59 cfm 703 cfm -ZONE HEATING & COOLING LOAD SUMMARY Project Name: LUCENT TITANIA Documentation: ENERGY CONSULTING. GROUP page 31 of 34 Date: 4/19/1999 COMPLY 24 User 2984 ' --------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY OF PEAK HOUR ZONE Name: DESIGN CONDITIONS -------------------- Pe!:;1.k Hour: Indoor Conditions: Outdoor Conditions: LOAD COMPONENT --------------. ------ Walt Conduction Window Conduction· Door Conduction Roof Conduction Skylight condu~tion Floor Conduction Slab Conduction Interior Conduction Infiltration Solar Gain Lighting Receptacle Process Occupants Heating AirFlow: Cooling Ai"rFlow: LOADS FOR ZONE AHU/13 COOLING . HEATING SENSIBLE LATENT --------------------- Jan 12am Aug 3pm 70 F DB 72 F DB 50 .Sk 0 RH 38 F DB 83 F DB 68 F WB Quantity Btu/hr Btu/hr Btu/hr --------------------------------- 270.0 s_qft 5799 3832 0.0 sqft 0 0 0.0 sqft 0 0 1620.0 sqft 2555 3193 0.0 sqft 0 0 Q.O sqft 0 0 0.0 sqft 0 0 · 0. 0 sqft 0 0 0.0 AC/hr 0 0 0.0 sqft 0 0 0.0 watts 0 1105 2430.0 watts 0 8294 0. 0 watts 0 0 8.1 occs 0 2065 1660 --------------------- ZONE LOADS 8353 18489 1660 8353 Btu/hr/ [1.08 x 18489 Btu/hr/ [1.08 x 35 F DeltaT)]" = 17 F DeltaT)] = 221 cfm 1009 cfm· .. . ·· ZONE HEATING & COOLING LOAD SUMMARY Project Name: LUCENT TITANIA Documentation: ENERGY CONSULTING GROUP page 32 of 34 Date: 4/19/1999 COMPLY 24 User 2984 ' --------------------------------------------------~------------------------ SUMMARY OF PEAK HOUR LOADS FOR ZONE ZONE Name: DESIGN CONDITIONS Peak Hour: Indoor Conditiqns: outdoor Conditions: LOAD COMPONENT Wall Conduction Window Conduction Door Conduction Roof Conduction Skylight Conduction Floor Conduction Slab Conduction Interior Conduction .Infiltration Solar Gain Lighting Receptacle Process Occupants Quantity ------------ 486.0 sqft 54. 0. sqft 0.0 sqft 2280.0 sqft 0.0 sqft 0.0 sqft 0 .. 0 sqft 0.0 sqft 0.0 AC/hr 54.0 sqft 0.0 watts 3420.0 watts 0.0 watts 22:8 occs ZONE LOADS AHU/14 COOLING HEATING SENSIBLE LATENT · Jan 12am 70 F DB 38 F DB Btu/hr ------- 10438 2056 · 0 3595 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------- 16089 Aug 3pm 72 F DB 50 % RH 83 F DB -68 F WB Btu/hr ------- 6603 452 0 4479 0 0 0 0 0 3587 1556 11672 0 5814 ------- 34162 Btu/hr 4674 4674 Heating AirFlow: Cooling AirFlow: 16089 Btu/hr I [1.08 x 34162 Btu/hr/ [1.08 x 35 F DeltaT)] = 17 F DeltaT)] = 426 cfm 1864 cfm • V -ZONE HEATING & COOLING LOAD SUMMARY Project Name: LUCENT TITANIA bocumentation~ ENERGY CONSULTING GROUP page 33 of 34 Date: _4/19/1999 COMPLY 24 User 2984 ---------------------------------· -----------------------------------'----- SUMMARY OF PEAK HOUR LOADS FOR ZONE ZONE Name: AHU/15 COOLING DESIGN CONDITIONS HEATING SENSIBLE LATENT ----------------------------------------- PAak Hour: Jan 12am Aug 3pm Indoor Conditions: . 70 F DB 72 F DB 50 9-:: 0 RH Outdoor Conditions: 38 F DB 83 F DB 68 F WB LOAD COMPONENT Quantity Btu/hr Btu/hr Btu/hr ------------------------------------------------------ Wall Conduction 0. 0 sqft 0 0 Window Conduction 0.0 sqft 0 0 Doqr Conduction 0.0 sqft 0 0 Roof Conduction 1256.0 sqft i981 · 2507 Skylight Conduction 0.0 sqft 0 0 Floor Conduction 0. 0 sqft 0 0 Slab Conduction 0.0 sqft 0 0 Interior Conduction 0.0 sqft 0 0 Infiltration 0.0 AC/hr 0 0 Solar Gain 0.0 sq.ft 0 0 Lighting 0.0 watts 0 857 Receptacle 1884.0 watts 0 6430 Process 13816.0 watts 0 47154 o·ccupants 12.6 occs 0 3203 2575 --------------------- ZONE LOADS 1981 60151 2575 Heating AirFlow: 1981 Btu/hr / (1. 08 x -35 F DeltaT)] = 52 cfm Cooling AirFlow: 60151 Btu/hr/ [1.08 x 17 F DeltaT)] = 3282 cfm ... . -ZONE HEATING & COOLING LOAD SUMMARY page 34 of 34 . . ------------------------------ Project Name: LUCENT TITANIA Documentation: ENERGY CONSULTING GROUP Date: 4/19/1999 COMPLY 24 User 2984 ---------------------------------------------------------------------t ____ _ SUMMARY OF PEAK HOUR ZONE Name: DESIGN CONDITIONS -------------------- Peak Hour: Indoor Conditions: outdoor Conditions: LOAD COMPONENT --------------------- Wall Conduction Window Conduction Door conduction Roof Conduction Skylight Conduction Floor Conduction Slal;) Conduction Interior Conduction Infiltration Solar Gain Lighting Recep:tacle Process Occupants Heating AirFlow: Cooling AirFlow: LOADS FOR ZONE AHU/7 COOLING HEATING SENSIBLE LATENT --------------------- Jan 12am Aug 3pm 70 F DB 72" F DB 50 9-: 0 RH 38 F DB 83 F DB 68 F WB Quantity Btu/hr Btu/hr Btu/hr --------------------------------- 0.0 sqft 0 0 0.0 sqft 0 0 0.0 sqft 0 0 5100.0 sqft 8042 10180 0.0 sqft 0 0 0.0 sqft 0 0 0.0 sqft 0 0 0.0 sqft 0 0 0.0 AC/hr 0 0 0.0 sqft 0 0 o:o watts 0 3481 .7650. 0 watts o· 26109 178500.0 watts 0 609221 51.0 occs 0 13005 10455 -·-------------------- ZONE LOADS 8042 661996 · 10455" 8042 Btu/hr/ .[1.08 x 661996 Btu/hr/ [1.08 x · 35 F OeltaT)] = 17 F DeltaT)] = 213 cfm 36115 cfm , ••• -« FAX NAME;: FAX NUMBER: LAST TRAN$ACTION REPORT FOR HP FAX-700 SERIES SMITH_CONSULTING-OUT 6197934787 MIE I.lliE REMOTE FAX NAME AND NUMBER DURATION ffi RESULT 21-APR 21 :16 S 16503734401 0:04:16 · 10 ·oK S=FAX SENT I=POLL IN<FAX RECEIVED) O=POLLED OUT<FAX SENT) VERSION: 01.03 DATE: 21-APR-99 TIME: 21 :20 DIAGNOSTIC 66384010018C TO PRINT THIS REPORT AUTOMATICALLY. SEL~CT AUTOMATIC REPORTS IN THE SETTINGS MENU. to PRIN, MANUALLY. PRESS THE REPORT/SPACE BUTTON. THEN PRESS ENTER. HP OfficeJet Personal Printer/Fax/Copier Identification 16503734401 OK 10 7.5.0 Sent ·Fax Log Report for Smith Cosulting . 619 793 4787 Apr-22-99 09:26 AM Duration Diagnostic Apr-22 09:23A 00:03:43 002486030022 FAX.NAME: FAX NUMBER: LAST TRANSACTION REPORT FOR HP FAX-700 SERIES SMITH_CONSULTING-OUT 6197934787 D8IE IIl1E REMOTE FAX NAME AND NUMBER DURATION 2G RESULT 21 -APR 21 : 27 S 1 6503734401 0:03:37 10 OK S=FAX SENT I=POLL IN<FAX RECEIVED> O=POL~ED OUT<FAX SENT) VERSION: 01.03 DATE: -21 -APR-99 TIME: 21 :31 DIAGNOSTIC 66384,010018C TO.PRINT THIS REPORT AUTOMATICALLY, SELECT AUTOMATIC REPORTS IN THE SETTINGS MENU. TO P~INT MAN~ALLY, PRESS THE REPORT/SPACE BUTTON, THEN PRESS ENTER. HP OfficeJet Personal Printer/Fax/Copier Identification 16503734401 OK 07 7.S.O Sent Fax Log Report for Smith-Cosulting 619 793 4787 · Apr-22-99 09:43 AM Duration Diagnostic Apr-22 09:40A 00:02:29 002486030022 SmithConsu tingArchitects September 5, 2000 Mr. Mike Peterson CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, California 92009 Re: Lucent Technologies 2101 Faraday Avenue/ Plan File 99-1270 SCA Project 00253 Dear Mike: We are submitting for approval a revised fire protection technical report and four revised drawing sheets that reflect construction changes that deviate from the approved technical report and stamped drawings. The changes affect two rooms that were originally classified as H3 occupancies, but were built as, and have been re-classified as, 8 occupancies. This project's final inspection is contingent upon approval of a technical report and drawings that match the built conditions. Rooms 302 and 413 were originally classified as H3 due to the use offlammable solids (reference May 12, 1999 technical report para. 7.8). The use of flammable solids has been eliminated and replaced by utilizing flammable liquids/ pastes (reference June 21, 1999 technical report para. 7.8). With the derating of these two rooms, the H3 occupancy separation requirements are eliminated. The construction changes include the following: 1) changing rated gypsum board walls to non-rated, except at one-hour corridors; 2) changing rated gypsum board ceilings to non-rated suspended acoustical ceilings (and eliminating smoke/fire dampers in ductwork); and 3) changing 60 minute rated door assemblies to non-rated, except at one-hour corridors (20 minute). The enclosed drawings reflect the revised occupancies, revised ceiling construction and revised door assembly label requirements. The technical report reflects the elimination of flammable solids and includes a revised Hazardous Material Inventory Summary on page 11. Please feel free to call us if you have any questions. PJB/ Attachments 12220 El Camino Real Suite 200 San Diego, CA 92130 858.793.4777 858.793.4787 Fax fDRfE . §IE(C(U[ffiff1l1f R..UrFlE .§fillHEW. TVA -FiRE &. -Life SAFETY, INc. . September 27, 2000 Mike Peterson GITY of CARLSBAD 1635 Faraday Ave Carlsbad,. CA 92008 Re: Luc.ent Techn~logies.:... Carlsbad, Ca, Fire.Protection Technical Report Dear Mr. Peterson: San Diego Los ·Angeles · Detroit Atlanta Dallas Minneapolis. New Jersey This.-letter is to.swnmarize th~·changestothe ~bove referenced reports·dated May 12, 1999 and June 21, 1999. Revisions were made to .the report on June '21, .1999. Revised or additional text is shoWJ1 in italics. Revisions consist of: · · · -1. Change to the executive summary (indicating that flammable solids were eliminated and therefore H-3 ,. · room is not requited)., , . . . _ · ·_ _ , 2. Revising sectjpn ?.2.1 to indicate occupcmcy classification is Fl/B (eliminating the twp H-3 rooms). , 3. Eliminating the lafit sentence ~f section 5 .1 {1\~,o morns (RMT 2 alld CL~ Thi@k WilFFJ: Loo) aFS. r@qmrsd to @6ffiPlY 1:wtll M 3 01.1.upoo@y r@€f_uir@m@nts du@ to ui,e op@H of flammool@ solids (2 le.).} 4. Modified section 6.11 and adde,d 6.12, renµmbeted original 6.12 through 6; 19 to 6.13 through 6.20 respectively. ' . ' . . . ·. . 5. Revised .section 7.8 to indicate "Lucent· 'Technologies has:elimiriateci _the· use of any f1a.mµ1able solids· from its processes~ by utilizing flammable liquids (pastes).-None present." 6. : Eliminating the. last sentence of section 8.2.1 {'fvio rooms (~MT 2 ood GL3 Thiek Film Loo) aF@' r€l€f_Uin~d . to e@mflly A:vith M 3 01.1.apID1ey re€f_Uirem0Rts du@ to use op@n of flammool@ solids (2 Jb.).} -· · 7~ Revised section 8.2.14 to.indicate "Liquid tight floors are not required for this area."· 8. Revised secti9n 8.2.14 to indicate_ "Noncombustible floors are not required for this area." 9. Revised sun;nnary · chart in section 10 to .indicate elimination of Hammable solids. 10. Revised dated on cover, and revisions to· "headers" oh e~ch page. _ -, 1 _ I ; _ I_ hope the above .information is useful and of assistance to you. Aftir you have had a chance to review this, please eontact me with any of your questions .or comments. . -' . ~~phR13less, Jr. . Fire Protection Consultant cc: · John M:cElroy, Lucent-Tecluiolgy -Peter,,Smith Consulting Architects _ ·. REB/TVA,-File C:\WINDOWS\!;)csktop\Carlsbad~ ~A-Luccnl-fD Ltr2.doc· \. 2820 CAMiNo dEL Rio Squrl-l ~ SufrE 200 • SAN DIECjO, CA 92108 • TEL (619) 296-5666 • FAX (619) 296-5656 I ' -"' -' ',.- I I I I I I -I I I I I I I I I I- I I·_ · ··-FIRE SECU_R_ITV _ LIFE-SAFETY TVA FiRE & LifE SAFETY, INC. . ', .. . . . . . ... ' . . . . ._. ~ .. -'I •.' LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES Carlsbad, Ca Fire Protection -Technical Report March 30,. 1999 (Revised June 21, 1999) ·,· .. ' .. ' _ .... --. : . ' .. . ; ,, .. .... -. -. . . .. '... . ~: . , .. _._ .... • -~-.!,l • :-... :_--1-' ,_. -:1 .,; __ :,.,_._·-,. ~.' ·-.· :-• •.•... : .... • San Diego Detroit Atlanta New Jersey ' . . . •• '. 5 ,• • ·• -. -• • J, ' • • ~ • • 1 , ~ ~ •• ,'· ..... : • .:,: • •• ' • • I:.· ~;-·. -· -·· ·-.' , .,_: '. ""!""""'", . ·-._.-•:, ·-~·· ---··-__,...<",:_--_:: .... _·· , ~r:· ,._ .. ·---·--·. --.....,_>.··._:, ,._'--~;_.::··_,, ~ .. , .... ·_· .-i··._. __ .... __ ... :.,.:··~. ~_· .. ::.·-· . -_,·._ .. .-:: ;~ --~!·: ..... · .. -.· .... ··.··.·: .. _---~.·:, _.··._. ·._ ' . 2820 CAMiNcfdEl· Rio ·Sourl-1 • ,SuiTE .200.-• SAN' Di~qo, CA 92108 .• -TEL (619) _296.:5666 ~-FAx (6]9).296-565(? · · '.. . . . '· . . . . : .. -~... . ' . ' .: ~ /~ ... ~. " •.. . · .. .,. :-·.· .. ' ; . -~-' -· . .-. . . . . -. ' I I I I I I I I .I I I I I I I I 1· I Lucent Technologies -Carlsbad, CA Fire Protection Plan June 21, 199,9 Page 2 of 13 TABLE OF ·coNTENTS 1 EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW .........................................•.................................... ; ............................................. 3 2 GENERAL ................. : ..................... : .......................................... : ................................................................... 4 3 SUMMARY OF REQUIREl'vIENTS ........... : ............................................ .' ..................................................... 4 4 GENERAL BUILDING INFORMATION .................................................................................................. : ... 5 5 OCCUPANCY ................................................................................................................................................ 5 6 USE ................................................................................................................................................................. 5 7 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ........................................................................................................................ 8 8 INDOOR STORAGE AND USE OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ......................................................... : .. 9 . . 9 SPRINKLER PROTECTION CRITERIA ........... , .............................................................. : ........................ 10 10 HAZARDOUS MATERIAL INVENTORY SUMMARY ...... : ................................................................... 11 11 CONCLUSION .......................................................... : .................................................................................. 12 12 ATTACHMENT NUMBER i -HAZARDOUS MATERIAL INVENTORY INFORMATION .............. 13 ··,· > . _ ..... ' ,·' . . -; . ·, ~--. . . -. ' -. .., . .. , ' ' I ·-·, .:· . . .· -.. . '.· . - • .,-:·:·,\ :,, ~ ,' _.,:.-. •, ·:: I ,~_,:,.: ·_.,, :~ ·, t , .... ":••' ~• • ._: ( ,· ~!, . -.. ' . '~ .. . ~ . . •.. , !. . ; ,._ .. . .. . . ' , .. > ,'.. • . ,, •': . ·. ,· •• h '· •• -. ' ' . . ~ . . ' . . . . .,..-' : . . ' : ;~ . . ' : ~ r'. : . ·,. . • :· . '.-: . I ·I I I I I I I :1 I I I I I I I I . . - ·I I Lucent Technologies -Carlsbad, CA Fire Protection Plan June 21, I 999 Page 3 of 13 1 EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW This analysis is to present the fire protection requirements as set forth by Uniform Building Code (UBC), Uniform Fire Code (UFC) and National Fire Protection Associati'.on (NFPA) for the commodities being stored in this building and at this site. · Applicable requirements have been reviewed to identify des~gn and construction criteria. This study of fire protection requirements was developed at the request of Lucent Technologies management. The purpose of this request was to make recommendatiop.s to assure compliance with Uniform Building Code· (UBC) and Uniform Fire Code (UFC) f<:>r the proposed facility .. This fire protection review consisted of review of proposed project documents, analyzing intended uses, classification of hazardous materials anci code research. The facility will be divided in to multiple control areas, utilize hazarqous material and flammable liquid storage cabinets and be fully sprinklered to maintain levels of material well below the exempt amounts. This report identifies the findings and conclusions of_this analysis. Report is sectionalized into the following subjects: . 1.1 Executive Overview. 1.2 General. 1.3 Summary of Requirements. 1.4 General Building Information. 1.5 Occupancy. 1.6 Use. 1. 7 Hazardous Materials. 1.8 Indoor Storage and Use of Hazardous Materials. 1.9 Sprinkler Protection Critefia. 1.10 Hazardous Material Inventory Summary. 1.11 Conclusion. Note that revisions were made to this report on June 21, 1999. Revised_or additiona? text is shown ir, italics. Revisions consist of this change to the executive summary, and eliminate the flammable solids ... . ' . Eliminating the flammable so_li~s_.eliminated the requir~~ents far H-3 roo1:1s. ,.•I• , ' ··'-' ~-.. f . ;, ' - : \ . ,. ·-· ' . ., . -·.· ·.· ·: \ -. ' ·-,,• -. : ... · -· ,' : ... :; ' .. .. ~-... ; ;:. . . . . . . . -·· .. -.. ·{ , . -: . -' .... . -. : .. - . : ,~ '· :-. I 1-· I I I_ I I I I I I I I I I. I- I I 1··_ Lucent Technologies -Carlsbad, CA Fire Protection Plan June 21, 1999 Page 4 ofl3 2 GENERAL 2.1 Building -Lucent Technologies research and manufacturing facility is approxi~ately 65,000 square feet in area. Distances to exits do not exceed 200 feet at any point in the facility. The facility will be protected with an automatic fire sprinkler system that complies with or exceeds all ·applicable standards governing this facility. 2.2 Commodities -Lucent Technologies has a total of approximately 75 commodities that are a mixture of Class I, II, III, IV and V commodities. Approximately 11 commodities are Class· V. The products are not high pile stocked. 2.3 Storage -Products are stored in hazardous material and flammable liquid storage cabinets when not in use. Reserve quantities are limited, to minimize stocking. Quantities indicated are maximum quantities anticipated once facility reaches full capacity. · 2.4 Disposal -All hazardous material products are recycled or disposed of in conformance with state and : federal laws. The liquid byproducts are placed in waste recept_acles (i.e. cans or drums). No floor drainage is provided with in the work areas to eliminate any potential accidental discharge:to sewer system. 3 SUMMARY OF REQUIREMENTS The following list is the requirements summarized from the body of this report. It is intended to give the reader the essence of the criterion for this project. 3 .1 Construction Type 3.1.1 III-N, Concrete tilt up walls, metal truss roof. 3 .2 Occupancy classification 3.2.1 Building is an F-1/B. 3 .3 Minimum Separation from property line 3.3.1 . 60 ft. to allow for unlimited area (sprinklered building).· 3.4 Fire Resistance of Walls (typical for Warehous~, Aerosol, Cotro·~ive and Oxidizer Areas): 3.4.1 Bearing Walls =·2 hours. - 3.4.2 Control Area Walls= 1 hour. 3 .5 A,rea Separation = .4 hours. 3.6 Travel Distance -Ail areas must be within 200 of an, ~xit: . · · 3.7 3.8 . ' ' . -. . . . . . ':, Panic Hardware -These ~~as must be equipped with panic hardware. '. . . -. ... -. .. . :, .. -. . : ., . . . Special. Fi~e Departme~t Permits r~quired: 3:8.1. · ·.: Hazardous ·Material. : ·, · '· ... . : . ~ ' : __ ; . ',. ' .. -· •• 4 • ~- ..... , . ' . ,. . , I I I I I I I I I I I· I I Lucent Technologies -Carlsbad, CA Fire Protection Plan June 21, 1999 Page 5 of 13 3.8.2 Flammable and Combustible Liquid. 3.9 Explosion Venting -Not Required. 3.10 Mechanical Smoke Removal Exhaust-Not Required. 3.11 Mechanical Ventilation-Required at 6 ach. 3.12 Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems must be installed to protect all occupancies. Required design densities and areas of application for each area vary. The areas that are precedent setting are: · 3 .12.1 Labs and Production Areas -.20/1500 plus 250 gpm. 3.122 Shipping and Receiving -.297/2000 plus 500 gpm. 3 .13 Spill/Drainage Control and Secondary Containment -Not Required. 3 .14 Hazardous materials shall be safeguarded with such facilities, as public safety requires. 3 .15 Incompatible hazardous materials must be separated. 3 .16 Minimum 8'_ main aisles are .required in the shipping and receiving area. 3.17 Panic hardware is required on all exit doors. 4 4.1 .. 5 5.1 GENERAL BUILDING INFORMATION During a review of the project documents it was determined that this building is ~pproximately 65,000 square feet. The building construction is of concrete tilt up walls with open web metal truss roof. This building is being renovated to accommodate two levels, with production on the first floor and offices on the second. ' · OCCUPANCY There are several different· oc~upancies that will share this building: The building houses a 2 story office area defined as B occupancy, small shipping and receiving area defined as an F-1, research and testing · labs, and production areas.· .The research and testing labs, and production areas are ~efined as Band F-1 occupancy._ ·6 USE . Lucent Technologies is a research am:! manufacturing facility: ·There· are· several different _"depart~~nts" in the : .facility. The following paragraph~ provide.an <;)Verview of their U$e. -. . . . , . . . . .. 6.1 .· ·SMTl (C;e~~~Ih) -S~rface ~~~t pr6c~s·s: line fo~ buildi~g p#nted ~irc~its~ in~iudirig reflow. soldering 0~ soJd~r pas~e, paste pn.11:tirig, _glµe dispensing~ chip placeip.ent, therinaj greas~ dispens~ng~ inspectiqn and Ylt::cirical te~t. Exterio! -~o th~~ ~l~anroom, ther_e will also ·l?e _a solder· pa~te step.cil cleaner t~ ~~move the I._ 1·· .... ·:· • ._: r , ·~ . ' ~ : '.- I I ·I Lucent Technologies -Carlsbad, CA Fire Protection Plan June 21, 1999 Page 6 of 13 paste residues from the used stencils. This unit will use Alpha Metals BI OACT SC-10 cleaning solvent ( closed loop). I 6.2 SMT2 -Surface Mount Lab -Surface mount experiments for developing model circuits in 1 to 20 unit_ {Z..W\ quantities. This includes solder paste printing with a small, manual stencil, chip placement, reflow, solder I ~'0-Z-. paste dispensing from syringes by an automatic dispenser. It may also include wire bonding and pull testing, epoxy dispensing (for the wire bonded devices), cavity fill, and component encapsulation with I I I I I I I I I I 6.3 6..4 epoxies, all dispensed from 10cc syringes. Some hand soldering with solder wire and irons will also be done. El -Electrical Lab #1 -Individual circuit modeling and testing. Operations include hand soldering of small components with soldering irons and solder wire, hand dispensing of solder paste from 10cc syringes, followed by hot iron reflow, and general cleanup with water and with isopropanol from wash bottles. E2 -Electrical Lab #2 -Electrical characterization of circuit models, including thermal testing in bench- top wind tunnel, testing of magnetic circuit elements, thermal stress testing, and parametric testing: A small-amount of hand-soldering with wire will be done. 6.5 CLl---FMA/Materials Characterization Lab-Scanning Electron Microscopy and Scanning Acoustic Microscopy of failed samples to determine failure modes, preparation of samples for cross-sectioning analysis (cutting, grinding, polishing of lucite-encased samples), Instron pull testing, Atomic Absorption and Thermogravimetric analyses of lab samples for elemental composition, X-Ray fluorescence analysis and film thickness measurement of plated coatings, depotting and de-encapsulation of plastic molded electronic components. The chemical operations will be the dissolving of the plastic molding compounds on silicon chips in solvent, and the preparation ofliquid samples for AA analysis, and solid samples for TGA studies. '6.6 CL2-Plating Lab-EJectrolytic plating of copper, nickel, and solder films on ceramic hybrid circuits, titration and pH analysis of the plating solutions. The plating baths themselves are situated in exhausted stations with recirculating rinse systems. The rinse water is cycled through ion exchange columns to remove contaminants. Once the retention capacity of the_ resin is reached~ it is drummed and sent to disposal. No sanitary drain connections will be made ~n the plati_ng lab. The titration samples wiH be drummed after the an_alysis is fi~shed. · · 6) CL3 -J'hick Film Lab_;_ Sc~een printing of thick film pastes onto flexible ceramic substrates, lamination . . ,· (U\\ 4-) ?of flexible cerami~ tape into ~ layered structure, sl<?W firing of said structure to create ·multilayer ceramic hybrid, micropunching and handling of flexible tape, formulation of thick film paste used to print conductor patterns on the tape, general.cleanup. I· 6.8 ··1:· -I_, ----:_ . ' ' -. . . · CL4.-Prot9type Multilayer.Laminate Lab..:.. Fabrication of exp~riment<';ll printed circuit boards. invoh'.es ~he fo}lowirtg-wet and 4,:y processes: -· 6.8.1 · · Acid cleani~g (Sulfuric add} · 6.8.2 Dry ~aniination ~fphotor~stst (Dupont RISTON dry fil~-resist) 6J~.3 '. uv::exp~sing' 9f :phot?resi~1 :_' . ' ., .. : . .-. This I I I I I I I. I I I I I I I I. Lucent Technologies -Carlsbad, CA Fire Protection Plan June 21, 1999 Page 7 of 13 6.9 6.10 6.11 . 6.12 6.8.4 6.8.5 6.8.6 ·6.8.7 6.8.8 6.8.9 6.8.10 6.8.11 6.8.12 6.8.13 Photoresist developing (aqueous) Copper etching· Photoresist stripping (also aqueous) Oxide surface treatment Inner layer stack vacuum lamination Via drilling Via hole desmearing Electroless copper plating , Solder mask printing and curing Panel pre-routing CL5 -Molding Lab (Future Development) ~ Lab for printed circuit and hybrid circuit overmolding development. Includes experimental injection molding of plastics, some de-encapsulation of plastics with solvents, cleaning of post-molded packages, flow testing and analysis of mold flow patterns. CL6 -Prototype Overmolding Shop (Future Development) -Larger version of molding lab, primarily · dedicated to higher throughput injection molding operations" CL7 ---Chemical Storeroom --Designated location for storing stencil washer and Alpha Metals BIOACT SC-10 cleaning solvent. CL8 -Chemical Storeroom ··· Designated location for storing fresh chemicals, such as new solder paste and Alpha Metals BIOACT SC-10 cleaning solvent. Also for storing waste drums and containers prior to disposal. 6.13 E3 -EMI Chamber -Electromagnetic Interference testing of model circuits. Chamber is self-contained, with its own equipment room. 6.14 FS I -Shipping/Receiving -Area for unloading and loading trucks, storing received equipment and materials prior to moving them to their ultimate loca~i?ns, etc 6.15 FS2 -Packing/Kitting -Area for prepari_ng finished good~ for shippipg, packing materials storage an~ preparation, cardboard box storage, etc. · 6.16 FS3 -Factory Services Area -Areas for instaliation of factory support equipment, sµch as DI water · storage tank, air compressors (if n:ecessary), 4ot :water boilers; HV AC pumps,-factory monitoring system, etc. 6.17. FS4-: Tool Room.:... "1'-'."fechanical lab" for_fix~ure an4 to6ling develop~ent, prototyping _of fixtures, rep~ir _·. · .of equipm~nt. Include·s driJling, :roµting, milling, ~anding,.polishing, sand blasting, etc. . ~ . ' . . . . . ' . . . 6.18 FS5 -s·e~urify -Monitoring lo~atio:i;i for cl_osed ci~cui~ carhera; systems and building. alarms. • • • ·-• '. .' _,: • • • • • • •• • ' J • .. • --• ' • ·, -' ,_-:, ~ • ' • • : ~ • : ; -· • • ... • • •• 6.19 .Qi ~ QU:ality 'As~ura:nc~ _Lab~ -Quali~ ¢valuations· of i~i~~in~ materials, finished gooqs; etc.· Aiso · , . · . · ·qµality_record stqi-age and_retrieyal.-·-~-· ... :··. :~ ·_-: ··. ·. : _._.-_:_. · ·:·_' · · · -~ · .':-· _--_=·. · · _ · -.· · _ :-· · · . · ,_ ·_ . . . . . . . . ~ .., ' ·, . . . . .. ' . ... . . -~ . , .. •' ,.,• r·.,· - I I I I I I I I I I I 1· I I I I' I -1 I Lucent Technologies -Carlsbad, CA Fire Protection Plan June 21, 1999 Page 8 of 13 6.20 Q2 -Qualification Lab -Electronic environmental testing of model circuits, accelerated life testing, temperature-humidity-bias testing, temperature cycle testing, ESD, and mechanical testing. (No chemicals) 7 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ' ' 7.1 A hazardous material inventory statement _is attached for your review. There are approximately 75 products that make are classified as a combination of eighteen Physical and or Health Hazards. There is a combination of storage (and use closed), and inside use open of these materials. 7.2 Combustible Liquids -Lucent Technologies primary use of this product classification is as a stencil wash solution. Since products will be in a sprinklered building, and the majority of the products will be fo flammable liquid cabinets, separated into mu!tiple control areas, quantities are below the exempt amounts per UFC Article 79. 7.3 Flammable Liquids -Lucent Technologies utilizes very limited quantities of flammable liquids, with the totals below 1 gallon. Since products will be in a sprinklered building, and a portion of the products will · be in 'flammable liquid cabinets, separated into control areas, quantities are below the exempt amounts per UFC Article 79. 7.4 Oxidizers -Lucent Technologies primary use of this product classification is for etching. Since products will be in a sprinklered building, and a portion of the products will be separated into control areas, quantities are below the exempt amounts per UFC Article 80. 7.5 Unstable Reactives -Lucent Technologies primary use of this product classification is for etching. Since products will be in a sprinklered building, and a portion of the products will be separated into control areas, quantities are below the exempt amounts per UFC Article 80. · 7.6 Water Reactives -Lucent Technologies utilizes very limited quantities of water reactives, wit~ the totals below 1 gallon. Si,:1ce products will be in a sprinklered building, and a portion of the products will be in flammable liquid cabinets, separated into control areas, q~antities are below the exempt amounts per UFC Article 80. · 7.7 Combustible Dust -Lu~ent Technologies utilizes very Jimited quantities of combustible dust, with the totals below 2.5 cubic feet (22.5lb.). Since produc{s will be in a sprinklered building, and a portion of the products will be in flammable liquid cabinets, separated into control areas, quantities are below the exempt amounts pe! l!FC Article 80. . . , r . . . 7.8 Flammable Solid~ Lucent Tech.nologies has elimi~~ted'fhe use of any flammaql~ solids from "it!f pto~esses, bY,_u_tilizing_flam~able liqui_ds (pttites). None present.' · · · ' . ·'. _. --... · 7.9. ·_Oxygen: Lucen.t'Technologi~s utilizes very \imited quantities ofqxygen. · Since products will b~ in a· . . _sprinklered build~ng, and_a p-ort~ori onhe pr~.4~~ts will be in fl~aqle)iquid cabinets,·separated in~o conu;-ol ?fea_s,--quantities ar~ below the exempt amounts per UFC Article 80. . . . ' . . . . .. ' .., · .. : .... ·. : .. ·: ·.: .. :· . : -.. -. . ,. : -\ . . . ' '.. . . -' . . ' ' .. I I I I I ·1 I I I I I I I I I I I --·1 1· -Lucent Technologies -Carlsbad, CA Fire Protection Plan June 21, 1999 Page 9 of 13 7.10 Corrosives -Lucent Technologies primary use of these products are for the solder plating baths. Since products will be in a sprinklered building, and a portion of the products will be in flammable liquid cabinets, separated into control areas, quantit_ies are below the exempt amounts per UFC Article 80. 7.11 Carcinogens, Irritants, Sensitizers, and Other Health Hazards -Lucent Technologies primary use of this product is in it's solder paste processes. Since products will be in a sprinklered building, and a portion of the products will be in cabinets, quantities are below the exempt amounts per UFC Article 80. 7.12 Toxics -Lucent Technologies primary use of these products are for the plating. Since products will be in a sprinklered building, and a portion of the products will be in hazardous material cabinets, separated into control areas, quantities are below the exempt amounts per UFC Article 80. 8 INDOOR STORAGE AND USE OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS 8.1 A review ofUBC Chapter 3 and 4, UPC ~icle 79 and 80 and the products' MSDS sheets determines that the products stored in this area include Physical and Health Hazards. Please refer to the attached summary sheets for breakdown oflnside St~rage, and Inside Use Open of these hazards. 8.2 Because_.ofthe mixed storage and use of Physical and Health Hazards numerous Code sections are applicable. For clarity, the general requirements applicable to the entire building are defined below. with information on where Code specifies its_inclusion. 8. 2.1 Occupancy classification-·· The building is classified as an B (laboratories and research) and F-1 ·(production and shipping/receiving) occupancy per UBC 304.2.2.1 and 306._1. This is based on the quantities of Physical and Health Hazards identified in the summary and attached hazardous 8.2.2 material inventory information. Flammable and Combustible Liquids -Flammable and combustible liquids are present at this facility in quantities below the amounts that would require construction of a Liquid Storage Warehouse (exempt amount). The "exempt amount" term should not be perceived as indicating· that no protection provisions apply, just that the protection provisions required to upgrade to a Liquid Storage Warehouse are not required. The provisions of 7901, 7902 and 7903 apply, as applicable, based on the types of products and storage I use methods. , · 8.2.3 · Separation from property line -To receive the allowance· for unlimited area witli a III-N _ sprinklered building, a minimum separatjon from property line of 60 ft. is required (UBC Table 9-C). Allowable area is based on the primary occupancy classification·ofthe building (Band F- 8.2.4 8.2.5 8.2.6. 8.2.7 8.2.8 l). (UBC 504.3 Exception 1 and 2). · Fire Resistance of Walls 8.2.4.1 Exterior Walls= 2 hours with 60 ft.·sideyards (Bearing·-UBC Table 5-A) 8.2.4.2 Interior Walls= Labs ~d 9ther similar occupancies shall be s~parated by one hour occupancy separation walls (U:BC 304.2.2. ~ ). · : Travel Distance -All are?s mus(be:within 200 ft. of ari·exit (UBC 1Q03.4) P?11ic Hardware -No latch or iocks.allowed on exits except panic hardware (UBC 1004.5). _-·All ·-. . . . , , . . . -. -· . Special Fire Department Permits requited:. ' _8.2.8.1 I:Iazardous Mat~rial (UFC--8001.3). : .. ,· ', ' . I I I I I I I I .I I I I I I I I 1. ·1 1: Lucent Technologies -Carlsbad, CA Fire Protection Plan June 21, 1999 Page IO of 13 9 9.1 9.2 .9.3 ,, 8.2.9 8.2.10 8.2.11 8.2.12 8.2.13 8.2.14 8.2.15 8.2.16 8.2.17 8.2.18 8.2.19 8.2.8.2 Flammable and Combustible Liquid (UFC 7901.3). Special plans or submittals required: 8.2.9.1 Hazardous Material Management Plan (HMMP) and Hazardous Material Inventory Statement (HMIS) (UFC 8001.3). . 8.2.9.2 Flammable and Combustible Liquid (part of the HMMP and HMIS). 8.2.9.3 High Pile Storage -As indicated in UFC 8101.3.2. Explosion Venting -Explosion venting is not required. Mechanical Smoke Removal Exhaust -Mechanical smoke removal exhaust is not required. · Mechanical ventilation is provided via mechanical exhaust units in above the tooling and foam areas. Hoods are provided in laboratories. Ventilation ,..viJl be provided to comply with UMC requirements for use of Class I-IIIA liquids (UBC 1202.2.2). Fire extinguishing system must be designed to prntect the worst case hazard. Ref~r to Sprinkler Protection Criteria section of this report. Spill control and drainage control and secondary containment is not required for this area. Liquid tight floors are not required for this area. Per UFC section 8001.9.2, storage of hazardous materials shall be safeguarded with such protective facilities, as public safety requires. This would require sufficient security measures as deemed necessary by the occupant and the jurisdictio11 (i.e. fencing, locked gates, etc.}. Noncombustible floors are not required for this area. · Per UFC section 8001.9.8, incompatible hazardous materials must be separated. Portable Fire extinguishers shall be provided per UFC Std 10-1 (UFC 7901.5 .3 ). Provide labels and signage in accordance with UFC 7901.9. SPRINKLER PROTECTION CRITERIA Fire extinguishing system must be designed to protect the worst case hazard in the area. According to the riser tag, the existing sprinkler system is capable of providing a .45/2000 density. For storage of Hazardous Material and Flammable and Combustible· Liquids, ~he worst case hazard is· Class IB liquids (container size= 5 gallons or less) to 6 feet maximum height on shelves. Per UBC Std. 9~1 and UBC 904.3.5.3, the area would be considered ru1.0rdinary Hazard Group 2 Occupancy. This requires: 9.2.1 Ceiling density and area of application= .20/1500 · 9.2.2 Ceiling sprinkler= 165°F 9.2.3 Maximum spacing of roof sprinklers= 130 square feet 9.2.4 250 GPM hose demand. 9.2.5 Minimum water duration woulq. be 2 hours. 9.2.6 Height ofStorage-6 Fe.et maximum· 9.2.7 Type of Fixture -Shelf . . 9.2.8 Commodity Class :-Flammable an~ Combustibl_e pq?ids .. (Non-encapsu~ated) .. -' ' For shipping and'receiving, the worst case hazard is ~lass I-IV non-encap~ul~ted pr~ducts to' 12 'reet maximum height in double row racks (maximum '12 ft. wicie) 'with 8 feet ·aisles. :Per UFC Std. 81 :2, 6- 11.1 ( d) Curve E utilizing ~86°f sprinklers arid applying a· 60% ~redit. for 12 ·storage height the criteria is: . , . ,'• . ,' ' : .. -"···. ·. ·.... . .' .. ·.:. . -_-. . . , . . ~ I I I I I I I· I I I: I 1· I I I I 1. I . 1· Lucent Technologies -Carlsbad, CA Fire Protection Plan June 21, I 999 Page 11 of 13 9.3.l 9.3.2 9.3.3 9.3.4 9.3.5 9.3.6 9.3.7 9.3.8 9.3.9 9.3.10 Roof density and area of application= .297 /2000 Roof sprinkler = 286°F Maximum spacing of roof sprinklers = 100 square feet 500 GPM hose demand. Minimum water duration would be 2 hours. · Main Aisles -8 Feet Minimum fleight of Storage-12 Feet maximum Type of Rack-Single and Double Row Commodity Class -I-IV (Non-encapsulated) Shelving -Open Frame Racks, Wire Mesh 10 HAZARDOUS MATERIAL INVENTORY SUMMARY Material Class Total. Quantities Allowable Quantities Amount Below Threshold Combustibl~ Liquid (Gal.) Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage. CLASS II 10.26 55.24 30.00 120.00 19.74 64,76 .. 1--------1------------------+------+-------t CLASS III- A CLASS III-B 1.07 1.36· . 0.20 .80.00 0.49 3~300.00 330.00 78.93 329.80 . 13,200.00 3,298.64 13,199.51 Flammable· CLASS I-A 0.24 1 0.01 10.00 30.00 9.76 29.99 Liquids (Gal.) CLASS I-B 0.14 0.13 15.00 60.00 14.86 59.87 Oxidizer (Gal.) OX 2 0;07 0.33 50.00 25.00 49.93 24.67 1--------1-------------+--,-----+-------+------f ox 1 5.38 -18.30 100.00 400.00 94.62 381.70 Unstable Reactive (Gal.) U. R. 1 19.55 53.09 NL NL NL NL Water Reactive W. R. Cl. 1 (Gal.) . Combustible Dust (cu.ft.) Oxygen Gas (Lb.) CARC (Gal.) CORR (Gal.)· IRR (Gal.) -SENS (Gal.) OHH (Gal.) TOX (Gal.) 0.40 ~)6 0.00 8.56 15.54 91.45 · 54.59 57.27 . 1.88 0.30 2.50 0.00 20.00 50.00 · NA 0.50 lQ0.00 100.00 220.51 100.00 166.17 100.00 167.14 100.00 0.46 12.50 12.50 2.10 12.20 100.00 17.84 100.00 150.00 NA 100.00 , 500.00 91.44 499.50 · 500.00 84.46. 474.03 500.00 8.55 279.49 500.00· 45.41 : 333.83 ·. 500.00 · 42.73 332.86. 50.00 ·10.62 49.54 AbovE3 Allowab_le Values. have not been increased for Sprinklers (100%), Co_ritrol Areas (100_%)_, · · or Cabinet~ (1 _00%) , , · · · •; .. ·-:. - . -·. ; ~ , ,. . . ~ . I I-- I I I I I I I ·1: I I I I I .1-· < •• Lucent Technologies -Carlsbad, CA Fire Protection Plan · ·June 2 I, 1999 Page 12 of.13 11 CONCLUSION We feel, this fire protection technical report is complete and provides adequate fire and life safety for the occupants of the building. · If you have any further questions please call. We would appreciate your reply at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, Ralph E. Bless, Jr. Fire Protection Consultant cc:· STG/REB/TV A -File P.\GENERAL\Luccnt Tcchnolo~ics\Carlsbad. CA•Luccnt-FPP3.doc . _: ... -: . : .... -I . . · .... ':, .,. •' • ~ •• I " • ,: : ':,'·.:' ·... :' --· . ..... . ,· ,·, .. ,• . •• ' I • • ·, , . . ' .. -. . .. --:>: .. '. · .. • • 'I-· .... \ ... , ,' . . :·' ' ,· .. ,. . ... J • ' Lucent Technologies ~ Carlsbad, CA · Fire Protection Plan June 21, 1999 Page i3 of 13 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 12 ATTACHMENT NUMBER 1-HAZARDOUSMATERIALINVENTORYINFORMATION 1.' .. I~ I._··: -. . . . I ... ·, · .. __ , ..... : ~,-. • ···! • . ' . ,• ·. . \. _. .. ··· . ~. ' : - " ':·' .. . . . ~. _:.., . ' :'' ~ :: ~-' --· ~,. ,· '; .. ' ,, ... ·---: ·. __ .. •,. Carlsbad, CA-LucentHMIS3 -------HMIS -----------Page I of32 - CO:\mm,NAME CLASS II SMTI SMT2 El E2 CL I FMA-Mal'I Lab CL 2 Plating Lab CL 3 Thick Film Lab CL4 PWB Lab Use Open Storai:e Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage AL-Chelate Cataposit 44 Catalyst Cataprep S40 Circuposit 484B Oxide Circuposit Conditioner 211 Circuposit Neutralizer 3313 Circuposit PB 484 A Oxide Circuposit PB Modifier Circuposit PB Oxide Con,·ener Circuposit Promoter 3308A Circuposit Promoter 3308B Circuposit Z Cuposit 1175 Conditioner Cuposit 328A Cu Concentrate Cuposit 328L Cu Concentrate Cuposit Accelerator 19 Cuposit Y CupositZ DX-4S (Potassium carbonate) Hydrochloric Acid LPI Developer NaOH Standard Preposit Etch 748 Modified Rosin Diethylene Glycol Butyl Ether Aluminum Oxide Epoxy Resin n-Butyl Glycidyl Ether 0.00 lsopropyl Alcohol 0.00 0.08 0.13 0.07 0.08 0.03 0.01 0.03 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Xylene Mixed Aliphatic Hydrocarbons I-Proproxy-2-propanol 10.00 SS.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Terpene Hydrocarbons Oxygen die bond epoxy Mixture Acetone Mixture Acrylic powder Cuningoil Pyrophosphoric Acid Phosphoric Acid June 21, 1999 JJ ·- Carlsbad, CA-LucentHMIS3 -------s ----------Pa-2 - COi\lMO~ NAME CLASS 11 SMTI SMT2 El E2 CL I FMA-Mat'I Lab CL 2 Plaring Lab CL 3 Thick Film Lab CL4 PWB Lab Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Ammonium Hydroxide Ammonium Chloride Copper Sulfate Sulfuric Acid Nickel Sulfamate Sulfamic Acid Citric Acid Nickel Carbonate Nickel Chloride Nickel Sulfate Nickel Salts Solder plating bath Solder plating bath Solder plating bath Solder plating bath Solder plating bath Rinse baths Plating Station Exhaust Reagent 0.1 N Standard Indicator Indicator Indicator Reagent 0.1 N Standard Reagent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hood Exhaust Mineral Spirits OleicAcid Silver Palladium Ferrite Powder Ethyl Cellulose Alpha Terpineol Perfluoroalkylelher Perfluoroalkylelher Ferrite Powder Total per Sprinklered Control Area 10.08 55.13 0.07 0.09 0.03 0.01 0.03 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total all Control Areas USE OPEN 10.26 Total all Control Areas Storage 55.24 June 21, 1999 Carlsbad, CA-LucentHM!S3 ------_,s ----------Pag-- COMMO:-iNAl\lE . CLASS Ill-A SMTI SMT2 El E2 CL I FMA-Mat'l Lob CL 2 Plating L:ib CL 3 Thick Film Lob CL4PWBL3b Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage AL-Chelate Cataposit 44 Catalyst Cataprep 540 Circuposit 484B Oxide Circuposit Conditioner 2 I 1 Circuposit Neutralizer 3313 Circuposit PB 484 A Oxide Circuposit PB Modifier Circuposit PB Oxide Converter Circuposit Promoter 3308A Circuposit Promoter 3308B Circuposit Z Cuposit 1175 Conditioner Cuposit 328A Cu Concentrate Cuposit 328L Cu Concentrate Cuposit Accelerator 19 CupositY CupositZ DX-45 (Potassium carbonate) · Hydrochloric Acid LP! Developer NaOH Standard Preposit Etch 748 Modified Rosin Diethylene Glycol Butyl Ether Aluminum Oxide Epoxy Resin n-Butyl Glycidyl Ether 0.00 Isopropyl Alcohol 0.07 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.01 0.03 0.01 0.13 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.13 0.03 000 0.00 0.00 Xylene Mixed Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 1-Proproxy-2-propanol Terpene Hydrocarbons Oxygen die bond epoxy Mixture Acetone Mixture Acrylic powder Cutting oil Pyrophosphoric Acid Phosphoric Add June 21, 1999 Carlsbad, CA-LucentHMIS3 -------s ----------Page-- COl\11\10:'\NAl\lE CLASS Ill-A SMTI SMT2 El E2 CL I FMA•M01'l Lob CL 2 Plating Lob CL 3 Thick Film Lob CL4PWBLab Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Ammonium Hydroxide Ammonium Chloride Copper Sulfate Sulfuric Acid Nickel Sulfamate Sulfamic Acid Citric Acid Nickel Carbonate Nickel Chloride Nickel Sulfate Nickel Salts Solder plating bath Solder plating bath Solder plating bath Solder plating bath Solder placing bath Rinse baths Plating Station Exhaust Reagent 0.1 N Standard Indicator Indicator Indicator Reagent 0.IN Standard Reagent Hood Exhaust Mineral Spirits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.66 002 0.00 0.00 OleicAcid Silver Palladium Ferrite Powder Ethyl Cellulose Alpha T erpineol Perfluoroalkylether Perfluoroalkylether Ferrite Powder Total per Sprinklered Control Area 0.07 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.01 0.03 0.01 0.13 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.79 0.05 0.00 0.00 Total all Control Areas USE OPEN 1.07 Total all Control Areas Storage 0.20 June 21, 1999 Carlsbad, CA-LucentHMIS3 -------s ----------Pag-- CO:'\'llllON NAME . CLASS 111-B Sl,ITI S1,IT2 El E2 CL I FMA-M"11 Lab CL 2 Pl:itlng Lab CL 3 Thick Film Lab CL4PWBLab Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Stoi-age Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage AL-Chelate Cataposit 44 Catalyst Cataprep 540 Circuposit 484B Oxide Circuposit Conditioner 211 Circuposit Neutralizer 3313 Circuposit PB 484 A Oxide Circuposit PB Modifier Circuposit PB Oxide Converter Circuposit Promoter 3308A Circuposit Promoter 3308B Circuposit Z Cuposit 1175 Conditioner Cuposit 328A Cu Concentrate Cuposit 328L Cu Concentrate Cuposit Accelerator 19 CupositY CupositZ DX-45 (Potassium carbonate) Hydrochloric Acid LPI Developer NaOH Standard Preposit Etch 748 Modified Rosin Diethylene Glycol Butyl Ether Aluminum Oxide Epoxy Resin 0.02 0.02 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 n-Butyl Glycidyl Ether 0.00 0.17 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 lsopropyl Alcohol 0.00 Xylene Mixed Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 1-Proproxy-2-propanol Terpene Hydrocarbons Oxygen die bond epoxy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 . 0.00 0.00 o.oo 0.00 0.00 Mixture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Acetone Mixture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Acrylic powder Cutting oil 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Pyrophosphoric Acid Phosphoric Acid June 21, 1999 Carlsbad, CA-LucentHM!S3 ------liiil5 ----------Pa-2 - COMi\101' !\AME - CLASSIII-B S~IT I S~IT2 El E2 CL I FMA-M:u'I Lob CL 2 Pl:uing Lob CL 3 Thick Film Lab CL4PWB Lob Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Ammonium Hydroxide Ammonium Chloride Copper Sulfate Sulfuric Acid Nickel Sulfamate Sulfamic Acid Citric Acid Nickel Carbonate Nickel Chloride Nickel Sulfate Nickel Salts Solder plating bath Solder plating bath Solder plating bath 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 So!aer plating bath Solder plating bath Rinse baths Plating Station Exhaust - Reagent 0. I N Standard Indicator Indicator Indicator Reagent 0.IN Standard Reagent Hood E.xhaust Mineral Spirits OleicAcid 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 Silver Palladium Ferrite Powder Ethyl Cellulose Alpha Terpineol Perfluoroalkylether Perfluoroalkylether Ferrite Pov.der Total per Sprinklered Control Area 0.18 0.42 0.07 0.07 L 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 1.00 0,00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total all Control Areas USE OPEN I 1.36 Total all Control Areas Storage I 0.49 I June 21, 1999 Carlsbad, 1wH-_ucent -,\1 !!,J ------.. ----------Pagiili - CO:\IMON l'i.-\ME . CLASS l•A SMTI SMT2 El E2 CL I FMA-M:1t1 Lab CL 2 Pl:lting Lab CL 3 Thick Film Lab CL4PWBLab Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage AL-Chelate Cataposit 44 Catalyst Cataprep 540 Circuposit 484B Oxide Circuposit Conditioner 211 Circuposit Neutralizer 3313 Circuposit PB 484 A Oxide Circuposit PB Modifier Circuposit PB Oxide Converter Circuposit Promoter 3308A Circuposit Promoter 3308B Circuposit Z Cuposit 1175 Conditioner Cuposit 328A Cu Concentrate Cuposit 328L Cu Concentrate Cuposit Accelerator 19 CupositY CupositZ DX-4S (Potassium carbonate) Hydrochloric Acid LPI Developer NaOH Standard Preposit Etch 748 Modified Rosin Diethylene Glycol Butyl Ether Aluminum Oxide Epoxy Resin n-Butyl Glycidyl Ether 0.00 lsopropyl Alcohol 0.00 Xylene Mixed Aliphatic Hydrocarbons l·Proproxy-2-propanol Terpene Hydrocarbons Oxygen die bond epoxy Mixture Acetone Mixture Acrylic powder Cutting oil Pyrophosphoric Acid Phosphoric Acid June 21, 1999 1 .... ar s Jae, t.A-.... ucentu-u~\-L~J ------.. ----------Pagilii - COMMON NAME . CLASSl·A SMTI SMT2 El E2 CL I FMA-llfat1 L3b CL 2 Ploting L3b CL 3 Thick Film L3b CL4 PWB Lob Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Ammonium Hydroxide Ammonium Chloride Copper Sulfate Sulfuric Acid Nickel Sulfamate Sulfamic Acid Citric Acid Nickel Carbonate Nickel Chloride Nickel Sulfate Nickel Salts Solder plating bath Solder plating bath Solder plating bath Solder plating bath Solder plating bath Rinse baths Plating Station Exhaust Reagent 0.1 N Standard Indicator Indicator Indicator Reagent O. IN Standard Reagent Hood Exhaust Mineral Spirits 0leicAcid Silver Palladium 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 Ferrite Powder Ethyl Cellulose Alpha Terpineol 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.01 0.00 0.00 Perfluoroalkylether Perfluoroalkylether Ferrite Powder Total per Sprinklered Control Area 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 . 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.01 0.00 0.00 Total all Control Areas USE OPEN 0.24_ Total all Control Areas Storage 0.01 June 21, 1999 1 ... ar sJac, t ... A• ... ucent, 1\. :.:,~, ------.. s ----------Pagelliil - COMMON NAME . CLASSl·B SMTI SMT2 El E2 CL I FMA-Mat1 I.ob CL2Platingl..ob CL 3 Thick Film I.ab CL4PWBl..ob Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage AL-Chelate Cataposit 44 Catalyst Cataprep 540 Circuposit 484 B Oxide Circuposit Conditioner 211 Circuposit Neutralizer 3313 Circuposit PB 484 A Oxide Circuposit PB Modifier Circuposit PB Oxide Converter Circuposit Promoter 3308A Circuposit Promoter 3308B Circuposit Z Cuposit 1175 Conditioner Cuposit 328A Cu Concentrate Cuposit 328L Cu Concentrate Cuposit Accelerator 19 CupositY CupositZ DX-45 (Potassium carbonate) Hydrochloric Acid LP! Developer NaOH Standard Preposit Etch 748 Modified Rosin Diethylene Glycol Butyl Ether Aluminum Oxide Epoxy Resin n-Butyl Glycidyl Ether 0.00 lsopropyl Alcohol 0.00 Xylene 0.03 0.13 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Mixed Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 1-Proproxy-2-propanol Terpene Hydrocarbons Oxygen die bond epoxy Mixture Acetone 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 000 Mixture Acrylic powder Cutting oil Pyrophosphoric Acid Phosphoric Acid June 21, 1999 Lar .. sJaL, lA· .... ucen -1~'-.... ~ .. , ------1111111s ----------Pagel-- COMMON NAME CLASSI-B SMTI SMT2 El E2 CL I FMA-M:tt'I Lab CL 2 Pl:iting Lab CL 3 Thick Film Lab CL~PWBl..ab Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Ammonium Hydroxide Ammonium Chloride Copper Sulfate Sulfuric Acid Nickel Sulfamate . Sulfamic Acid Citric Acid Nickel Carbonate Nickel Chloride Nickel Sulfate Nickel Salts Solder plating bath Solder plating bath Solder plating bath Solder plating bath Solder plating bath 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 Rinse baths Plating Station Exhaust Reagent 0.1 N Standard Indicator Indicator Indicator Reagent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 000 0.00 0.00 0. IN Standard Reagent Hood Exhaust Mineral Spirits OleicAcid Silver Palladium Ferrite Powder Ethyl Cellulose Alpha Terpineol Perfluoroalkylether Perfluoroalkylether Ferrite Powder Total per Sprinklered Control Area 0.03 0.13 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total all Control Areas USE OPEN 0.14 Total all Control Areas Storage 0.13 June 21, 1999 Carlsbad, CA-LucentHMIS3 ------.. ----------Pagallf - COMMOi'i'NAME OX2 S~IT I S~IT2 El E2 CL I FMA·M:>t1 Lab CL 2 Pl:iting Lab CL 3 Thick Film Lab CL4 PWB Lab Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage AL-Chelate Cataposit 44 Catalyst Cataprep 540 Circuposit 48-IB Oxide Circuposit Conditioner 211 Circuposit Neutralizer 3313 . Circuposit PB 484 A Oxide Circuposit PB Modifier Circuposit PB Oxide Converter Circuposit Promoter 3308A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.07 0.33 Circuposit Promoter-3308B Circuposit Z Cuposit 1175 Conditioner Cuposit 328A Cu Concentrate Cuposit 328L Cu Concentrate Cuposit Accelerator I 9 CupositY CupositZ DX-45 (Potassium carbonate) Hydrochloric Acid . LPI Developer NaOH Standard Preposit Etch 748 Modified Rosin Diethylene Glycol Butyl Ether Aluminum Oxide Epoxy Resin : n-Butyl Glycidyl Ether 0.00 lsopropyl Alcohol 0,00 Xylene Mixed Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 1 ·Proproxy-2-propanol Terpene Hydrocarbons Oxygen die bond epoxy Mixture Acetone Mixture Acrylic powder Cutting oil i')Tophosphoric Acid Phosphoric Acid June 21, 1999 Carlsbad, CA~LucentHMIS3 ------1111 ----------Pagell'flt - - COMMON NAME OX2 SMTI SMT2 El E2 CL 1 FMA-M:n1 L,b CL 2 Pl,ting L,b CL 3 Thick Film ub CL4 PWBL,b Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Ammonium Hydroxide Ammonium Chloride Copper Sulfate Sulfuric Acid Nickel Sulfamate Sulfamic Acid Citric Acid Nickel Carbonate Nickel Chloride Nickel Sulfate Nickel Salts Solder plating bath Solder plating bath Solder plating bath Solder plating bath Solder plating bath Rinse baths Plating Station Exhaust Reagent 0.1 N Standard Indicator Indicator Indicator Reagent 0.1 N Standard Reagent Hood Exhaust Mineral Spirits OleicAcid Silver Palladium Ferrite Powder Ethyl Cellulose Alpha Terpineol Perfluoroalkylether Perfluoroalkylether Ferrite Powder Total per Sprinklered Control Area 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.33 Total all Control Areas USE OPEN 0.07 Total all Control Areas Storage 0.33 June 21, 1999 Carlsbad. CA-LucentHM!S3 ------.. -· ---------Pagel. - COMMON NAME OXI SMTI SMT2 El E2 CL I FMA-Mot1 Lab CL 2 Ploting Lab CL 3 Thick Film Lob CL4PWBLab Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage AL-Chelate Cataposit 44 Catalyst Cataprep 540 Circuposit 484B Oxide Circuposit Conditioner 21 I Circuposit Neutralizer 3313 Circuposit PB 484 A Oxide 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.66 Circuposit PB Modifier Circuposit PB Oxide Converter Circuposit Promoter 3308A Circuposit Promoter 3308B Circuposit Z Cuposit 1175 Conditioner Cuposit 328A Cu Concentrate Cuposit 328L Cu Concentrate Cuposit Accelerator 19 CupositY CupositZ DX-45 {Potassium carbonate) Hydrochloric Acid LP! Developer NaOH Standard Preposit Etch 748 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.23 17.64 Modified Rosin Diethylene Glycol Butyl Ether Aluminum Oxide : Epoxy Resin n-Butyl Glycidyl Ether 0.00 lsopropyl Alcohol 0.00 Xylene Mixed Aliphatic Hydrocarbons l-Proproxy-2-propanol Terpene Hydrocarbons Oxygen die bond epoxy Mixture Acetone Mixture Acrylic powder Cutting oil Pyrophosphoric Acid Phosphoric Acid June 21, 1999 Carlsbad, C~-LucentHMIS3 ------.. ---------IIIIIJaget41!111 - COM:\ION NAME OX! SMTI SMT2 El E2 CL I FMA-M:it'I Lab CL 2 Pl:,tlng Lab CL 3 Thick Film Lab CL4 PWB Lab Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Ammonium Hydroxide Ammonium Chloride Copper Sulfate Sulfuric Acid Nickel Sulfamate Sulfamic Acid Citric Acid Nickel Carbonate Nickel Chloride Nickel Sulfate Nickel Salts Solder plating bath Solder plating bath Solder plating bath Solder plating bath Solder plating bath Rinse baths Plating Station Exhaust Reagent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.1 N Standard Indicator Indicator Indicator ·"Reagent 0.IN Standard 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 · 0.7S 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reagent Hood Exhaust · Mineral Spirits Oleic Acid Silver Palladium Ferrite Powder Ethyl Cellulose Alpha Terpineol Perfluoroalkylether Perfluoroalkylether Ferrite Powder Total per Sprinklered Control Area 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.50 18.30 Total all Control Areas USE OPEN 5.38 Total all Control Areas Storage 18.30 June 21, 1999 Carlsbad, CA-LucentH:-.11S3 ------------------~get5111 - COMMON NAME U.R I SMTI SMT2 El E2 CL I FMA-Mat1 Lab CL 2 Plating Lob CL 3-Thick Film Lab CLHIVBLab Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage AL-Chelate Cataposit 44 Catalyst Cataprep 540 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19.40 52.92 Circuposit 484B Oxide Circuposit Conditioner 211 Circuposit Neutralizer 3313 Circuposit PB 484 A Oxide Circuposit PB Modifier Circuposit PB Oxide Converter 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.17 Circuposit Promoter 3308A Circuposit Promoter 3308B CircupositZ Cuposit 1175 Conditioner Cuposit 328A Cu Concentrate Cuposit 328L Cu Concentrate Cuposit Accelerator 19 CupositY Cuposit Z DX-45 (Potassium carbonate) Hydrochloric Acid LPI Developer NaOH Standard Preposit Etch 748 Modified Rosin Diethylene .Glycol Butyl Ether Aluminum Oxide Epoxy Resin n-Butyl Glycidyl Ether 0.00 lsopropyl Alcohol 0.00 Xylene Mixed Aliphatic Hydrocarbons I-Proproxy-2-propanol Terpene Hydrocarbons Oxygen die bond epoxy Mixture Acetone Mixture · Acrylic powder Cutting oil i'}TOphosphoric Acid Phosphoric Acid June 21, 1999 Carlsbad, CA-LucentHMIS3 ------.. ----------Pagel .. - COM'.\ION NA'.\IE U.R. I S~ITI SMT2 El E2 CL I FMA-Mot"I Lab CL 2 Ploting Lab CL 3 Thick Film Lab CL4PWBL3b Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Ammonium Hydroxide Ammonium Chloride Copper Sulfate Sulfuric Acid Nickel Sulfamate Sulfarnic Acid Citric Acid Nickel Carbonate Nickel Chloride Nickel Sulfate Nickel Salts Solder plating bath Solder plating bath Solder plating bath Solder plating bath Solder plating bath Rinse baths Plating Station Exhaust Reagent 0.1 N Standard Indicator Indicator Indicator Reagent O.IN Standard Reagent Hood Exhaust Mineral Spirits OleicAcid Silver Palladium 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 Ferrite Powder Ethyl Cellulose Alpha Terpincol Perfluoroalkylether Perfluoroalkylether Ferrite Powder Total per Sprinklered Control Area 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 19.44 S3.09 Total all Control Areas USE OPEN 19.SS Total all Control Areas Storage S3.09 June 21, 1999 Carlsbad, CA-LucentHMlS3 ------11111 ----------Pag""'2 - COMMON NAME . W.R.Cl. I SMTI S~IT2 El E2 CL I FMA-Mat1 Lab CL 2 Plating Lab CL 3 Thick Film Lab CL4PWBLab Use Open Storage l'seOpen Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage AL-Chelale Cataposit 44 Catalyst Cataprep 540 Circuposit 484B Oxide Circuposit Conditioner 211 Circuposit Neutralizer 3313 Circuposit PB 484 A Oxide Circuposit PB Modifier Circuposit PB Oxide Converter Circuposit Promoter 3308A Circuposit Promoter 3308B Circuposit Z Cuposit 1175 Conditioner Cuposit 328A Cu Concentrate Cuposit 328L Cu Concentrate Cuposit Accelerator 19 CupositY CupositZ DX-45 (Potassium carbonate} Hydrochloric Acid LPI Developer NaOH Standard Preposit Etch 748 Modified Rosin Diethylene Glycol Butyl Ether Aluminum Oxide Epoxy Resin n-Butyl Glycidyl Ether 0.00 lsopropyl Alcohol 0.00 Xylene Mixed Aliphatic Hydrocarbons l-Proproxy-2-propanol Terpene Hydrocarbons Oxygen die bond epoxy Mixture Acetone Mixture Acrylic powder Cutting oil fyrophosphoric Acid 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Phosphoric Acid June 21, 1999 Carlsbad, CA-LucentHMIS3 ------.. ----------Pagelll!I - . COMMON NAME WR.CI.I SMTI SMT2 El E2 CL I FMA-Mat1 Lab CL 2 Pl:uing Lob CL 3 Thick Film Lab CL4PWBJ..ob Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Ammonium Hydroxide Ammonium Chloride Copper Sulfate Sulfuric Acid 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.30 Nickel Sulfamate Sulfarnic Acid Citric Acid Nickel Carbonate Nickel Chloride Nickel Sulfate Nickel Salts Solder plating bath Solder plating bath Solder plating bath Solder plating bath Solder plating bath Rinse baths Plating Station Exhaust Reagent 0.1 N Standard Indicator Indicator Indicator Reagent : 0.1 N Standard Reagent Hood E.,haust Mineral Spirits OleicAcid Silver Palladium Ferrite Powder Ethyl Cellulose Alpha Terpineol Perfluoroalkylether Perfluoroalkylether Ferrite Powder Total per Sprinklered Control Area 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.30 Total all Control Areas USE OPEN 0.40 Total all Control Areas Storage 0.30 June 21, 1999 Carlsbad, CA-LucentHMIS3 ------• ---------llllge19JII' - COMMO:-; NAME CARC SMTI SMT2 El E2 CL 1 FMA·M:it1 Lob CL 2 Pl:uing Lab CL 3 Thick Film Lab CL4 PWBl.ab Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage l'.seOpen Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage AL-Chelate Cataposit 44 Catalyst Cataprep 540 Circupcisit 484B Oxide Circuposit Conditioner 211 Circuposit Neutralizer 3313 Circuposit PB 484 A Oxide Circuposit PB Modifier Circuposit PB Oxide Converter Circuposit Promoter 3308A Circuposit Promoter 3308B Circuposit Z Cuposit 1175 Conditioner Cuposit 328A Cu Concentrate 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.33 Cuposit 328L Cu Concentrate Cuposit Accelerator 19 CupositY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.17 CupositZ DX-45 {Potassium carbonate) Hydrochloric Acid LPI Developer NaOH Standard Preposit Etch 748 Modified Rosin Diethylene Glycol Butyl Ether Aluminum Oxide Epoxy Resin n-Butyl Glycidyl Ether 0.00 lsopropyl Alcohol 0.00 Xylene Mixed Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 1-Proproxy-2-propanol Terpene Hydrocarbons Oxygen die bond epoxy Mixture Acetone Mi:1.-rure Acrylic powder Cutting oil PYrophosphoric Acid Phosphoric Acid June 21, 1999 Carlsbad, CA-LucentHMIS3 ------• -----------Page20 of32 - COMMONNAl\lE CARC .• SMTI SMT2 El E2 CL I FMA-Mot1 Lab CL 2 Pl:iting Lab CL 3 Thick Film Lab CL4PWB Lab Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Ammonium Hydroxide Ammonium Chloride Copper Sulfate Sulfuric Acid Nickel Sulfamate 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Sulfamic Acid Citric Acid Nickel Carbonate 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Nickel Chloride 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Nickel Sulfate 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Nickel Salts 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Solder plating bath Solder plating bath Solder plating bath Solder plating bath Solder plating bath Rinse baths Plating Station Exhaust Reagent 0.1 N Standard Indicator Indicator Indicator Reagent 0.1 N Standard Reagent Hood Exhaust Mineral Spirits OleicAcid Silver Palladium Ferrite Powder Ethyl Cellulose Alpha Terpincol Perfluoroalkylether Perfluoroalkylether Ferrite Powder · Total per Sprinklered Control Area 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 . 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 o.so Total all Control Areas USE OPEN 8.56 Total all Control Areas Storage O.SO June 21, 19~9 Carlsbad, CA-LucentHM!S3 -------HMJS -----------Page 21 of32 - COMMON NAME CORR SMTI S~IT2 El E2 CL I FMA-M>t'I I.oh CL 2 PIO!ing I.oh CL 3 Thick Film Lob CL4 PWBLob Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage AL-Chelate 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.66 Cataposit 44 Catalyst 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 Cataprep 540 Circuposit 484B Oxide 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.33 Circuposit Conditioner 211 Circuposit Neutralizer 3313 0.00 0.00. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.66 Circuposit PB 484 A Oxide 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.66 Circuposit PB Modifier 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.17 Circuposit PB Oxide Converter Circuposit Promoter 3308A 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.33 Circuposit Promoter 3308B 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.66 Circuposit Z 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.17 Cuposit 1175 Conditioner 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.08 Cuposit 328A Cu Concentrate Cuposit 328L Cu Concen1rate 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.33 Cuposit Accelerator 19 0.00 0.00 ,0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.25 CupositY CupositZ. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.00 DX-45 (Potassium carbonate) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.88 3.53 Hydrochloric Acid 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.17 LP! Developer 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 NaOH Standard 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 Preposit Etch 748 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.23 17.64 Modified Rosin Diethylene'Glycol Butyl Ether Aluminum Oxide Epoxy Resin a-Butyl Glycidyl Ether 0.00 Jsopropyl Alcohol 0.00 Xylene Mixed Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 1-Proproxy-2-propanol Terpene Hydrocarbons Oxygen die bond epoxy Mixture Acetone Mixture Acrylic powder Cutting oil Pyrophosphoric Acid 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Phosphoric Acid 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 June 21, 1999 -------------------Carlsbad, CA·LucentH!\IIS3 HMIS Page22 of32 COMMON NAME CORR SMTl S~IT2 El E2 CL 1 f1.l .. ·Mat'I L:ib CL 2 Ploting L:ib CL 3 Thick Film L:ib CL4 PWBL:ib Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Ammonium Hydroxide Ammonium Chloride Copper Sulfate Sulfuric Acid 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00' 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.30 Nickel Sulfamate Sulfamic Acid Citric Acid Nickel Carbonate Nickel Chloride Nickel Sulfate Nickel Salts Solder plating bath 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Solder plating bath 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Solder plating bath 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100 . 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Solder plating bath 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 I.SO 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Solder plating bath Rinse baths Plating Station Exhaust Reagent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.1 N Standard Indicator Indicator Indicator Reagent 0. lN Standard Reagent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 Hood Exhaust Mineral Spirits OleicAcid Silver Palladium Ferrite Powder Ethyl Cellulose Alpha Terpineol Perfluoroalkylether Perfluoroalkylether Ferrite Powder Total per Sprinklered Control Area 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.84 2S.97 Total all Control Areas USE OPEN 15.54 Total all Control Areas Storage 25.97 June 21, 1999 Carlsbad, CA-LucentHMIS3 -------HMIS -----------Page23 of32 - CO:\IMON NAME IRR SMTl SMT2 El E2 CL I FMA-M:it1 Lab CL 2 Plating Lab CL 3 Thick Film Lab CL4 PWB Lab Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage AL-Chelate Cataposit 44 Catalyst Cataprep 540 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19.40 52.92 Circuposit 484B Oxide Circuposit Conditioner 211 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.66 Circuposit Neutralizer 3313 Circuposit PB 484 A Oxide Circuposit PB Modifier Circuposit PB Oxide Converter 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.17 Circuposit Promoter 3308A Circuposit Promoter 3308B Circuposit Z Cuposit 1175 Conditioner Cuposit 328A Cu Concentrate 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.07 0.33 Cuposit 328L Cu Concentrate Cuposit Accelerator 19 CupositY 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.17 CupositZ DX-45 (Potassium carbonate) Hydrochloric Acid 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.17 LPI Developer NaOH Standard Preposit Etch 748 Modified Rosin 44.10 110.2S 0.8S 0,09 0.88 0.04 0.88 Diethylene Glycol Butyl Ether 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Aluminum Oxide Epoxy Resin 0.02 0.02 0.07 0.07 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 n-Butyl Glycidyl Ether 0.00 lsopropyl Alcohol 0.07 0.13 0,00 0.00 0.03 0.01 0.03 0.01 0.13 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.13 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.13 007 0.08 0.03 0.01 0.03 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Xylene 0.03 0.13 0.01 000 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Mixed Aliphatic Hydrocarbons I-Proproxy-2-propanol 10.00 5S.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Terpene Hydrocarbons Oxygen die bond epoxy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Mixture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Acetone 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 Mixture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Acrylic powder Cutting oil Pyrophosphoric Acid Phosphoric Acid June 21, 1999 Carlsbad, CA-LucentHMIS3 -------HMIS -----------Page24 of32 - COMMON NAME IRR SMTI SMT2 El E2 CL I FMA-Mat1 l.:lb CL 2 Plating L,b CL 3 Thick Film l.:lb CL4 PWB L,b Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Ammonium Hydroxide 0.00 0.00 0.00 .0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Ammonium Chloride 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Copper Sulfate 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Sulfuric Acid Nickel Sulfamate 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Sulfamic Acid 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Citric Acid 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Nickel Carbonate 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Nickel Chloride 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Nickel Sulfate 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Nickel Salts 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Solder plating bath Solder plating bath Solder plating bath Solder plating bath Solder plating bath 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Rinse baths Plating Station Exhaust Reagent 0.1 N Standard 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Indicator Indicator 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Indicator 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reagent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.1 N Standard 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reagent Hood Exhaust Mineral Spirits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.66 0.02 0.00 0.00 OleicAcid 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 Silver 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 Palladium 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 Ferrite Powder 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 Ethyl Cellulose 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 Alpha Terpineol 0.00 · 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.01 0.00 0.00 Perfluoroalkylethcr 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 PerfluoroaJL-ylether 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Ferrite Powder 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total per Sprinklered Control Area 54.30 165,67 1.05 0.25 0.95 006 0.95 0.06 0,13 0.00 11.75 0.00 2.69 0.06 19.64 54,41 Total all Control Areas USE OPEN 91.45 Total all Control Areas Storage I 220.51 June 21, 1999 Carlsbad, CA-LucentHM!S3 -------HMIS ------------Page25 of32 COMMON NAME SENS SMTI SMT2 El E2 CL I F~l-\-M:u'I Lab CL 2 Plating Lab CL 3 Thick Film Lab CL4PWBLab Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Stor,;ge AL-Chelate Cataposit 44 Catalyst Cataprep 540 0.00 0.00 Circuposit 484B Oxide Circuposit Conditioner 211 0.00 0.00 Circuposit Neutralizer 3313 Circuposit PB 484 A Oxide Circuposit PB Modifier Circuposit PB Oxide Converter 0.00 0.00 Circuposit Promoter 3308A Circuposit Promoter 3308B Circuposit Z Cuposit 1175 Conditioner Cuposit 328A Cu Concentrate 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.33 Cuposit 328L Cu Concentrate Cuposit Accelerator 19 CupositY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.17 CupositZ DX-45 (Potassium carbonate) Hydrochloric Acid 0.00 0.00 LP! Developer NaOH Standard Preposit Etch 748 Modified Rosin 44.10 110.25 Diethylene Glycol Butyl Ether Aluminum Oxide Epoxy Resin 0.02 0.02 n-Butyl Glycidyl Ether 0.00 Jsopropyl Alcohol 0.07 0.13 0.00 0.08 0.13 Xylene 0,03 0.13 Mixed Aliphatic Hydrocarbons I-Proproxy-2-propanol 10.00 55.00 Terpene Hydrocarbons Oxygen die bond epoxy 0.00 0.00 Mixture 0.00 0.00 Acetone 0.00 0.00 Mixture 0.00 0.00 Acrylic powder Cutting oil Pyrophosphoric Acid Phosphoric Acid June 21, 1999 Carlsbad, CA-LucentHMIS3 --------HMIS -----------Page26 of32 CO:\IMON l'iA'.\IE SENS SMTI SMT2 -El E2 CL I FMA-M:111 ub CL2Platingl..3b CL 3 Thick Film ub CL4PWBl..3b Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Ammonium Hydroxide 0.00 0.00 Ammonium Chloride 0.00 0.00 Copper Sulfate 0.00 0.00 Sulfuric Acid Nickel·Sulfamate 0.00 0.00 Sulfamic Acid 0.00 0.00 Citric Acid 0.00 0.00 Nickel Carbonate 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Nickel Chloride 0.00 0.00 Nickel Sulfate 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Nickel Salts 0.00 0.00 Solder plating bath Solder plating bath Solder plating bath Solder plating bath Solder plating bath 0.00 0.00 Rinse baths Plating Station Exhaust Reagent 0.1 N Standard 0.00 0.00 Indicator Indicator 0.00 0.00 Indicator 0.00 0.00 Reagent 0.00 0.00 ,. 0.1 N Standard 0.00 0.00 Reagent Hood Exhaust Mineral Spirits 0.00 0.00 OleicAcid 0.00 0.00 Silver 0.00 0.00 Palladium 0.00 0.00 Ferrite Powder 0.00 0,00 Ethyl Cellulose 000 0.00 Alpha Terpineol 0,00 0.00 Perfluoroalkylether 0.00 0.00 Perfluoroalk-ylether 0.00. 0.00 Ferrite Powder 0.00 0.00 Total per Sprinklered Control Area 54.30 165.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.50 Total all Control Areas USE OPEN 54.59 Total all Control Areas Storage 166.17 June 21, 1999 -------------------Carlsbad, CA-LucentHM!S3 HMIS Page27 of32 COMMON NAME OHH SMTI SMT2 El E2 CL I FMA•Mat1 Lab CL 2 Plating Lab CL 3 Thick Film Lab • CL4 PWB!.ob Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage AL-Chelate Cataposit 44 Catalyst Cataprep 540 Circuposit 484B Oxide Circuposit Conditioner 211 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.66 Circuposit Neutralizer 3313 Circuposit PB 484 A Oxide Circuposit PB Modifier Circuposit PB Oxide Com·erter Circuposit Promoter 3308A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.33 Circuposit Promoter 3308B Circuposit Z Cuposit 1175 Conditioner 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 0.02 0.08 Cuposit 328A Cu Concentrate 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.33 Cuposit 328L Cu Concentrate Cuposit Accelerator 19 CupositY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 . 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.17 CupositZ DX-4S (Potassium carbonate) Hydrochloric Acid LP! Developer NaOH _Standard Preposit Etch 748 Modified Rosin Diethylene Glycol Butyl Ether 44.10 110.25 0.88 0.09 0.88 0.04 0.88 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Aluminum Oxide Epoxy Resin n-Butyl Glycidyl Ether 0.00 lsopropyl Alcohol 0.00 Xylene 0.03 0.13 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Mixed Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 1-Proproxy-2-propanol 10.00 55.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Terpene Hydrocarbons Oxygen die bond epoxy Mixture Acetone Mixture Acrylic powder Cutting oil Pyrophosphoric Acid Phosphoric Acid June 21, 1999 Carlsbad, CA-LucentHMIS3 -------HMIS ------------Page28 of32 - COMMON NAME OHH SMTI SMT2 El E2 CLIFMA-Mot'!Lab CL 2 Pl:wng Lab CL 3 Thick Film ub CL4PWBLab Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Ammonium Hydroxide Ammonium Chloride Copper Sulfate Sulfuric Acid Nickel Sulfamate Sulfamic Acid Citric Acid Nickel Carbonate 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Nickel Chloride Nickel Sulfate Nickel Salts Solder plating bath Solder plating bath Solder plating bath Solder plating bath Solder plating bath Rinse baths Plating Station Exhaust Reagent 0.1 N Standard Indicator Indicator Indicator Reagent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 o._oo 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 : 0.1 N Standard Reagent Hood fahaust Mineral Spirits OleicAcid 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 Silver Palladium Ferrite Powder Ethyl Cellulose Alpha Terpineol Perfluoroalkylether Perfluoroalkylether Ferrite Powder Total per Sprinklered Control Area 54.13 165.38 0.90 0.10 0.88 0.04 0.88 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.28 1.57 Total all Control Areas USE OPEN 57.27 Total all Control Areas Storage 167.14 June 21, 1999 Carlsbad, CA-LucentHMIS3 -------HMIS -----------Page29of32 - COMMON NAME TOX SMTI SMT2 El E2 CL I FMA-Mat1 Lob CL 2 Plating Lob CL 3 Thick Film Lob CL4PWB Lob Use Open Storage Use Open Storage, Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage AL-Chelate Cataposit 44 Catalyst Cataprep 540 Circuposit 484B Oxide Circuposit Conditioner 211 Circuposit Neutralizer 3313 Circuposit PB 484 A Oxide Circuposit PB Modifier Circuposit PB Oxide Converter 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ·0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.17 Circuposit Promoter 3308A Circuposit Promoter 3308B Circuposit Z Cuposit 1175 Conditioner Cuposit 328A Cu Concentrate . Cuposit 328L Cu Concentrate Cuposit Accelerator 19 CupositY CupositZ DX-45 (Potassium carbonate) Hydrochloric Acid LPI Developer NaOH Standard Preposit Etch 748 Modified Rosin Diethylene-Glycol Butyl Ether Aluminum Oxide Epoxy Resin n-Butyl Glycidyl Ether 0.00 Isopropyl Alcohol 0.00 Xylene Mixed Aliphatic Hydrocarbons I-Proproxy-2-propanol Terpene Hydrocarbons Oxygen die bond epoxy Mixture Acetone Mixture Acrylic powder Cutting oil Pyrophosphoric Acid Phosphoric Acid June 21, 1999 Carlsbad, CA-LucentHMIS3 ---------HMIS ----------. Page 30 of32 COMMON NAME TOX SMTI SMT2 El E2 CL I FMA-Mot1 l.ab CL2 Ploting l.ab CL 3 Thick Film l.ab CL4PWB1.ab Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Arnmoniwn Hydroxide Ammonium Chloride Copper Sulfate 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Sulfuric Acid 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.00 · 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.30 Nickel Sulfarnate Sulfarnic Acid Citric Acid Nickel Carbonate Nickel Chloride 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Nickel Sulfate Nickel Salts Solder plating bath Solder plating bath Solder plating bath Solder plating bath Solder plating bath Rinse baths Plating Station Exhaust Reagent 0.1 N Standard Indicator Indicator 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Indicator ·Reagent 0.1 N Standard 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.75 0,00 0.00 · 0,00 0.00 0.00 Reagent Hood Exhaust Mineral Spirits Oleic Acid Silver Palladium Ferrite Powder Ethyl Cellulose Alpha Terpineol Perfluoroalkylether Perfluoroalkylether Ferrite Powder Total per Sprinklered Control Area 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 1.71 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.17 0.46 Total all Control Areas USE OPEN 1.88 Total all Control Areas Storage 0.46 June 21, 1999 -------------------Carlsbad, CA-LucentHMIS3 HMIS-2 Page31 of32 COMMON NAME COMB DUST SMTl SMT2 El E2 CL I FMA-!llat1 Lab CL 2 Pl:iting Lab CL 3 Thick Film Lab CL4PWB!.ab Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage AL-Chelate Cataposit 44 Catalyst Cataprep 540 Circuposit 484B Oxide Circuposit Conditioner 2 I 1 Circuposit Neutralizer 3313 Circuposit PB 484 A Oxide Circuposit PB Modifier Circuposit PB Oxide Converter Circuposit Promoter 3308A Circuposit Promoter 3308B Circuposit Z Cuposit 1175 Conditioner Oxygen Acrylic powder 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Silver 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 Palladium Ferrite Powder 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 Ferrite Powder 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total per Sprinklered Control Area o.oc 0.0 o.oc o.oc o.oc o.oc o.oc o.oc 17.64 o.oc o.oc 0.0 3.97 o.oc o.oc o.oc Total all Control Areas USE OPEN 21.61 Total all Control Areas Storage 0.00 June 21, 1999 ------------------·-Carlsbad, CA-LucentHM!S3 HMIS-2 Page 32 of32 Oxygen Gas SMTI SMT2 El E2 CL I FMA-M3l'l Lab CL 2 Plating Lab CL 3 Thick Film Lab CL4PWBLab Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage Use Open Storage 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 o.oc o.oc O.O<I 50.0C o.oc o.oc 0.00 0.0( o.oc 0.00 o.oc 0.00 o.oc 0.00 o.oc o.oc 0.00 50.00 June 21, 1999 :) ,~· \ ; l l l •) I I ' ' . ,_...... CB991270 2101 FARADAY AV CBAD Tl 45460 SF-OFFICE & LAB Tl COMM Lot#: SMITH CONSULTING ARCHITECTS (ii £. ' ef&BUILOING r t · , / / . , PLANNING · q qq-1J {iy 6-f v I J-" . L,fs,_, · ___ !~!i!~~~~RM .. ,. ( I ___ HAZMAT/AIR QUAL • OTHER SEWER DISTR · {,.-,J 'l<d:s J 'Jfttw:V 1 [;;_,_, lvu-f ecboM' / / ~ cJI --BLDGGRADINGtETTER )otfj, 4L'¥4 '5vrt5 6 ~ ~ TO APPLICANT fT,CiM I' . ·;_:t.,,\NT ".r5\fr.' Lth f)~ 7W11 M Ero~jf i/1 ~ h'rvl Fr-oh:h;/1 ,r~ PLANCORR ~ -----1------ENGCORR ":\.:_, ~r /711c, RvvkJ knft_ 4-(lf /q1 lJ_,,;V\ c{/ 7, 7 (tr9 ()UJ>JJGf/--1t ~ U5>~ I cvlv Jt 6Lo./µ 6~~(;/c culi ~~ cL-,. 1,~~ __________ SCHOOL FORM --,----1------CFDFORM __________ p E & MWORKSHEET ____ _._ _____ BLDG FEES COMPLETE 5)5/11 iL/1 . r in jCJv; {,LY{-P,~ · , 5/ii/11 VflwJll A~;-~ de.tv(l,r~ -tu cs-1:r \ 1 C:.ftj~-1-o iv1y 'nf't Jff lo ,HM--Se:f tl1' no+ c;1_, CJJ/11/f (des-cl . sl<,J.5 IUeJ -/-o he,, 9/;154d +v 90-f ]L. . ') \L,vl l 4 1 D wY+ ~ \Cviv;, (!) ~ A IGtP. tcJ~!OD~~~~ r "Tv-c.~ -. t±1 ~ . '· ...... i.-,,; ·· . . . .>._ ,-· ,. ·/_:)' •,: "":. : . , .'',·'I . ·• i" . i. . . ::1;;e.-:;,t:·-.' '.. ,': ·. ,· .... I NO 5Gf/l€ • ,../ ·:_·:;-{~·: ·:;;_~.;.::.,:~· .!'~="'"" - ( _, RUTHGR. "ORO ·v1ctNITY MAP· SCALt;: 1"=3()' ... ) C a: 0 LL· ~ 0: 12,0. 31 T"C :. / ,, , UJ. 25~-6 Fl··: :c I-::> :'\ a: ~ / • I / -/ / ~·. l'l,~'1.,-• '· ---/ 1/rp'j? 7 . ~I I \ \ ' l.\ I\ /1 ~~/ \\\~ V \0\~ ~TOPOGRAPHIC ,, / .·....-.,-.. f / / ,, -· ·'i .. . •. $ jY.· .. ~(g~ .. ,! . , .. w· ··. ·: . •. . ., :. · ·q. to ·•· ... ,.,,,, .. ·Propose: §u;,~fll ... a~t . ·'·!l;tl/fmit . . -'_.,_:·.,:.,\,,'. .-: :' . . , , . .:. ,'' . . · .. 'l, 1r,,,Y 7 2G2. D TOP OF GRAT€ 5TDRM DRAIN !NltT) · . . ''i; · .. fY. ,,_ 'l, ··. p···· .. SUR-VEY. ' . 3" PEHP GAS ltNe J -=--~I AVENUE t:I • I ~I C . I I::?. ~~ ~I ~ Lui~ <:::> I . l!E:,;; \,r, ;:.:I ~ Ii: :i: PREPARED FOR:· s ~ ~ LEGAL. DESCRIPTION • THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN IS SITUATED IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF $AN DIEGO, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: LOT 43 OF CARLSBAD TRACT NO. 81-10, UNIT NO. 2-.A, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 11134, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY·RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, JANUARY 31, 1985. EASEMENT NOTES PER FIR6T AMERICAN TITLE /1/StJRA#CE Ci?M ORDER NO · l!/O:14/-20 DATEIJ: JA,i/. 3~ /!}95 ([) AN EASEMENT TO ERECT, CONSTRUCT, CHANGE THE SIZE OF, IMPROVE, RECONSTRUCT, RELOCATE, REPAIR, MAINTAIN AND USE FACILITIES CONSISTING OF tlNDERGROUND FACILITIES AND APPURTENANCES FOR THE TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRICITY, PIPELINES AND APPURTENANCES FOR ANY AND ALL PURPOSES, COMMUNICATION FACILITIES AND APPURTENANCES, THE RIGHT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, RECORDED MAY 22, 1985 AS FILE NO. 85-180319 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: . •.. ;· ·. ~ ... ,: . ' . . . I r,-r. . JI ::.J . _,,'J . ,: ·. r---.J THAT CERTAIN STRIP OF LAND 8,00 FEET IN WIDTH, LYING WITHIN SAID LOTS 25 THROUGH 43, INCLUSIVE, LYING ADJACENT TO AND COINCIDENT ·WITH THE EXTERIOR BOUNDARIES OF "FARADAY AVENUE" AND "RUTHERFORD ROAD" AS SHOWN .AND DELINEATED ON SAID MAP NO.· 11134. REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS. THE LIMITATIONS, COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS, EASEMENTS, TERMS, LIENS, ASSESSMENTS, PROVISIONS AND CHARGES BUT DELETING RESTRICTIONS, IF ANY, BASED ON RACE, COLOR, RELIGION. OR NATIONAL ORIGIN AS CONTAINED IN THE DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIONS RECORDED JUNE 29, 1988 AS FILE NO . . 88-313420 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. . SAID INSTRUMENT ALSO PROVIDES THAT ALL LIENS CREATED BY THIS DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIONS, INCLODI·NG,.·BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY REGULAR OR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR THE PAYMENT OF MONEY, SHALL BE. SUBORDINATE TO THE LIEN CREATED BY ANY FIRST DEED OF TRUST OR FJRST MORTGAGE. . . · SAID INSTRUMENT PROVIDES THAT A VIOLATION THEREOF SHALL NEITHER DEFEAT NOR RENDER INVALID THE LIEN OF ANY MORTGAGE OR DEED OF TRUST MADE FOR VALUE . _,,,,. PROPERTY AREA: ZONING: FLOOD ZONE: 4.03.L-ACRES (175,580 SQ,-FT.) CM (COMMERCIAL MANUFACTURING) "C" MAP NO. 060285 OOJOC ~ lYJJ.\? J J ]3 /} ~ NOTE: UTILI'.IY LINES SHOWN ON MAP PER IMPROVEMENT PLANS ON FILE CITY OF CARLSBAD AND wrrn SAN ~- \ ''a . ~, . AftrlF1c1AL FILL• " . ,, ' . . ' . ? Kpl ' POINT LOMA FORMATION ,: ,, ': :;;:....,. 'c,ot-&~ci . ' .. · · · : 0:'.·:8·1 BORING.LOCATION ~ .. · a-.. '' .. -"···,?s,: .· ''.·.·.·,·.·:,~····.':,:.:."'.·,.··. , .·. ; lOS.AUCiELES co . V.,,,,~=~ _ -,f RIVER.SIDE CO •. '. ,-. , ,. . .·, . . . . ·, , OJIA#GE CO · ' ' · . , 0 .,./-· >..' .. ·· .·.. ·~;. . . .-, · .'. .·SAN DIEGO CO.• , · ·. · ~ , ,. ~:·.,,,.-;:~ . ,. ' DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC, f BUILDING SETBACK NOTE: MINIMUM· SETBACK INTERIOR PROPERTY LINE IS ZERO OR JO' (IF BUILDING IS NOT @ ZERO SETBACK THEN BU1LDING . .·MUST BE SETBACK A MINIMUM OF JO') BENCHMARK: CONCRETE MONUMENT W/STANDARD DISC STAMPED E.C.R. 15 (LOCATED 500' SOUTH OF INTERSECTION OF EL CAMINO REAL AND PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD EAST OF EL CAMINO REAL ALONG FENCE LINE) ELEVATION : 296.48 LEGEND TC TOP OF CURB · FL · FLOW LINE '."'--"'""----FS FINISH SURFACE ·:,.,,,:· CONCRETE ZGt}O SPOT ELEVATION TPM TEMPORARY BENCH MARK ,A FOUND SURVEY WELL MONUMENT W/PUNCHED BRASS DISC a FOUND LEAD&TAG@?.00' OFFSET e . FOUND 3/4" IRON PIPE LS 3189 • FOUND IRON PIN NO RECORD d TREE "-~VISEP ..• , ·<:et1.Te:·.· 1,t.·. · · .•.. }_-~c~ LINE. ._,_..._~~~F,"·,;._·· .. · ;..· ,;....,.·-·-_;·;< .. ';..,·~,-.-·~~;..I .-JV-WATER LINE' .. ,,. ·. ,,,, .. :. .. . ,.,:.,,.;,:..,;.,;..:.__ S -SEWER LINE . ·., =.-= STORM DRAIN LINE OT 43 LOT 42 0 PINE·TREE • --.,,,,.,.. \ , \ LDT 3& · \ I ' . DETAIL FER /2J /CJ9S: NO SCALE ' PREPARED BY: BLACKMORE ·FARADAY PARTNERS O'MALLEY AND ASSOCIATES 1621 CONWAY DRIVE ESCONDIDO, CA. 92027. TEL. (619} 739-0258 . ' \ J0/3 NO. 7.9q -. ' ' ' ·,,.,I ' ., '~ ' ' , .. ~-'· ' ,,: ,-