The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2102 JANIS WAY; ; CB982101; PermitTot BUILDING PERMIT 11/24/98 09:29 Page 1 of 1 Job Address: 2102 JANIS WY Suite: Permit Type: RESIDENTAL ADD/ALT Parcel No: 167-240-23-00 Lot#: Valuation: 31,458 Occupancy Group: Reference#: Description: 321 SF ADDITION Appl/Ownr : I DEAL CONSTRUCTION 2958 MADISON ST STE 101 CARLSBAD CA 92008 *** Fees Required *** Fees: 5634 Adjustments: / .0 Total Fees: /63. Fee description / Build ing Permit Plan Check Strong Motion Fee BUILDING TOTAL Enter 'Y for Plurbinr I s Each Plumbing Fix. tire or p > Each Building Sewe Each Install/Repair Water 'ne 3 / Enter "Y e' for Elect ic INàOOED Enter Y" for Remod'\ Permit No: CB982101 Project No: A9802778 3fAvh~2P/Tgrbt oft 02 C-PRMT 375.0O .00 188.00 375.00 Ext fee Data ------------------ 289.00 , 188.00 3.00 1 J 480.00 20.00 Y 7.o/ 21.00 15.0/ 15.00 7.fO 7.00 / 10.00'Y / 10.00 Y Construction Type: VN Status: ISSUED Applied: 07/02/98 Apr/Issue: 11/24/98 Entered By: RMA 760 938-0470 _±i! ----------- -* * * I F/IIL APPROVAL LCLE-ARANCE DATLj CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (760) 438-1161 PERMIT 'APPLICATION CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad CA 92009 (760)438-1161 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY PLAN CHECK NO EST. VAL. Plan Ck. C Validated.J Address (include Bldg/Suite #) I Business Name (at this address) Legal Description Lot No. Subdivision Name/Number Unit No. Phase No. Total # of units Assessor's Parcel # Existing Use - Proposed Use Description of Work SQ. FT. .#of Stories # of Bedrooms # of Bathrooms --- T: Name Address City State/Zip Telephone # . Fax # - -- 7 Name f Address City State/Zip Telephone # Lqrn1 5r,qvT 4—' '1' 7 -,o1 - Nam6 Address - City State/Zip Telephone # .TCONTRACTOaQM1AriY _NAME--J (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law [Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code] or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars ($5001). a pz?-L. 4II - O /76n41 '11 '5 A-/o/JOii) s'r 4ie3 i -9aI- -76 Name Address City State/Zip Telephone # State License # Z /06 License Class -/ City Business License # Designer Name Address , City , State/Zip Telephone State License # Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: 0 I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance Of ie work for which this permit is issued. I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is kiss1ed. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Insurance Company 76 Policy No. 91 Expiration Date (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETE6 IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS I$1001 OR LESS) - C] CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100 . in additioij /j$ costpf compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor cod), interest and attorney's fees. SIGNATURE Ati'i A_ -. - DATE 7/i J9,L i-JVYNtM-bUILUtl1__UcLMtyiluI -_ I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: o I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). El I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sac: 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with Contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License-Law). - 0 I am exempt under Section ___ Business and Professions Code for this reason: I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for Construction of the proposed property improvement. 0 YES ONO I (have I have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name I address / phone number / contractors license number): I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinite, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone number I contractors license number): I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type of work): PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE DATE rCOMPLETE THI___SECTION _FORNON RESIDENTIAL_BUILDING_PERMITS ONLY Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? 0 YES 0 NO - Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? 0. YES 0 NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? 0 YES 0 NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT-HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. CONSTRUC1 ION I hereby affirm that there is a constr ction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097(i) Civil Code). LENDER'S NAME IL LENDER'S ADDRESS - I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building Construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the Cit, of Carlsbadto enter, upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the Building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 36 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after work is commenced fo en of 180 day Section 106.4.4 Uniform Building Code). - - APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE (I?'21. - DATE / WHITE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance - - & City of Carlsbad Inspection Request For: 6/15/99 U-7 Permit# CB982101 Inspector Assignment: PD Title: 321 SF ADDITION Description: Type: RAD Sub Type: Job Address: 2102 JANIS WY Suite: Lot Location: APPLICANT I DEAL CONSTRUCTION Owner: STANTON LYNNE Remarks: Total Time: Phone: 7604380470 Inspect dZ— Requested By: IDEAL CONSTR Entered By: CHRISTINE CD Description 19 Final Structural 29 Final Plumbing 39 Final Electrical 49 Final Mechanical Act Comments 0. . Inspection History Date Description 5/27/99 89 Final Combo 3/9/99 17 Interior Lath/Drywall 3/9/99 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall 3/4/99 17 Interior Lath/Drywall 3/2/99 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 2/19/99 16 Insulation 2/17/99 16 Insulation 2/12/99 84 Rough Combo 2/11/99 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 2/9/99 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 2/3/99 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 2/2/99 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 1/28/99 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 1/28/99 16 Insulation 1/22/99 13 Shear Panels/HD's 1/22/99 84 Rough Combo 1/20/99 84 Rough Combo 12/17/98 15 Roof/Reroof Act Insp Comments CO PD SEE NOTICE ATTACHED AP RB AP RB PA PD UPSTAIRS CO PD NO ONE HOME 9:30 AP PD NR PD NO ONE HOME 10:40 AP PD CA PD CA PD CO PD CA PD CO PD NOT LATHED CO PD AP PD WC PD CO PD ON CARD AF I' - EsGil Corporation In Partnership with government far Wui&Iing Safety DATE: 11/23/98 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 98-2101 SET: IV PROJECT ADDRESS: 2102 Janis Way PROJECT NAME: Stanton 2nd Story Additon U 'CANT JURIS U PLAN REVIEWER U FILE The plans transmittedherewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. -he plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. E The check list transmitted herewith is for your information.. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. E The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. . The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person I REMARKS: The Building Department please be advised that the proposed kitchen addition as circled in red on sheet I is not a part of this plan review. The note was added without alterting the plan reviewer. The retaining wall shown on the site plan is not part of this plan review. By: Mike Puckett Enclosures: Esgil Corporation 0 GA El MB El EJ 0 PC 11/17/98 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (619) 560-1468 • Fax (619) 560-1576 EsGil_Corporation 2n Partnership with Government for ui(11ing Safety DATE: 10/28/98 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 98-2101 PROJECT ADDRESS:2 102 Janis Way PROJECT NAME: Stanton 2nd Story Addition SET: II 2t~QA T JU U PLAN REVIEWER U FILE II The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. III the plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's.building codes when minor deficiencies identified in Remarks below are resolved and checked by building department staff. LII The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. LI The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Ideal Family of Remodelers 2958 Madison Ave. Ste. 101 Carlsbad, Ca. 92009 I Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant, except by mail, that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person LI REMARKS: By: Mike Puckett Enclosures: Esgil Corporation LI GA 0 MB [1 EJ D PC 10/19/98 trnsmtl dot GENERAL PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 2102 Janis Way DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 10/19/98 REVIEWED BY: Mike Puckett PLAN CHECK NO.: 98-2101 DATE REVIEW COMPLETED: 10/28/98 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1994 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints to: ESGIL CORPORATION. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? El Yes LJ No The following corrections are items not completely addressed from the previous plan review or are in response to new information provided. The Hilti Kwik Bolt fasteners specified for the intermediate anchor bolts at the shear panels attached to the masonry stem wall are approved only for concrete per the findings of the ICBO report listing requirements. Please specify an approved masonry anchoring system i.e. an epoxy anchoring system. Provide the ICBO listing approval number and complete the accompanying Special Inspection Program if required by the listing findings. Have the Engineer stamp seal and sign where indicated on the Special Inspection Program document. Please-note the ICBO listing number on the plans and that special inspection is required for the anchors. The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 619/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Mike Puckett at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. EsGil Corporation In Partnership with Governthentfor Building Safety DATE: 8/17/98 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 98-2101 SET:! PROJECT ADDRESS: 2102 Janis Way PROJECT NAME: Stanton 2nd Story Addition U APPLICANT JURI U PLAN REVIEWER U FILE The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. El The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. U The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil. Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the checklist is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Ideal Family of Remodelers 2958 Madison Ave. Ste 101 Carlsbad, Ca. 92009 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant, except by mail, that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #: - Mail Telephone Fax In Person LI REMARKS: By: Mike Puckett Enclosures: Esgil Corporation C] GA C] CM 0 EJ C] Pc 8/10/98 tmsmtl.clot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (619) 560-1468 • Fax (619) 560-1576 GENERAL PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 2102 Janis Way DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 8/10/98 REVIEWED BY: Mike Puckett PLAN CHECK NO.: 98-2101 DATE REVIEW COMPLETED: 8/17/98 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the. Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will- be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1994 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints to: ESGIL CORPORATION. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? L3 Yes C3 No The following corrections are items that were not completely addressed from the previous plan review or in response to new information provided for this plan review. I. Item #7 Please provide evidence from the Building Department that the soils report will be waived for this project or provide the soils report for plan review. The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation, located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 619/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Mike Puckett at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. 02/20/1995 01:56 760-434-0247 I DEAL CONSTRUCTION PAGE 01 === COVER PAGE' === TO: FAX: 43-cf94L FROM: I DEAL CONSTRUCTION FAX: 760-434-0247 TEL: 76-438-47 j W PAGE [5] TO FOLLOW COMMENT:.. çc/ Pell 02/20/1995 01:56 760-434-0247 I DEAL CONSTRUCTION PAGE 02 I-Deal Construction Company License #482108• -. - . -- ......----- Telephone 760-4380470 29M Madison Street Ste. 101 Cerlebed, CeII?omie 526 July 23, 1998 City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Dr. Carlsbad, Calif. 92008 RE: 2l02 Janis Way EsGil Plan Check No: 98-2101 Date: 7-17-98 Check list item #7 Gentlemen: We are requesting that the requirement for a soils report be waived on the above property for the following reasons the proposed addition is being built over an existing structure and all indications are the pad is cut as opposed to fill. The existing footings support a legal deck over garage. We propose to enclosed same area with design based on minimum of 1000PSI per 1994 UBC. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Cordially, Michael C Shea President EsGil Corporation 1n PartnersIiip with government for BiiiWng Safety DATE: 7/17/98 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 98-2101 PROJECT ADDRESS: 2102 Janis Way PROJECT NAME: Stanton 2nd Story Addition SET: I O APPLICANT UJU PLAN REVIEWER O FILE The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary -and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with. the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. El The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. S The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. • The applicant's copy Of the check list has been sent to: Ideal Family of Remodelers 2958 Madison Ave. Ste 101 Carlsbad, Ca. 92009 S Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant, except by mail, that the plan check has been completed. El Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS: The proposed retaining wall per Building Department Standard Drawings is not a part of this plan review. The Building Department to please approve and permit the retaining wall shown on the site plan. By: Mike Puckett Enclosures: Esgil Corporation GA LI CM El EJ D PC 7/7/98 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (619) 560-1468 • Fax(619)560-1576 Carlsbad 98-2101 7/17/98 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES PLAN CHECK NO.: 98-2101 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 2102 Janis Way FLOOR AREA: 321sf 2nd Story Rm Add/ STORIES: 2 Deck HEIGHT: REMARKS: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: 7/2/98 DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED: 7/17/98 DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 7/7/98 PLAN REVIEWER: Mike Puckett FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the. Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department: You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinance by the. Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building -permit. Present California law mandates that residential construction comply with Title 24 and the following model codes: 1994 UBC (effective 12/28/95), 1994 UPC (effective 12/28/95), 1994 UMC (effective. 2/23/96) and 1993 NEC (effective 12/28/95). The above regulations apply to residential construction, regardless of the code editions adopted by ordinance. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1994 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process,. please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. LIST NO. 1, GENERAL SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND-DUPLEXES WITHOUT SUPPLEMENTS (1994 UBC.) r3forw.dot Carlsbad 982101 7/17/98 1; Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets çn be submitted in one of two ways: Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92009, (619) 438-1161. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the' Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (619) 560- 1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments.. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 2. Please attach the Minimum Construction Specifications to the plans. Please show the existing building floor plan at the proposed room addition. Was it deck? Please dimension the floor plan to show the location of the interior wall that bisects the room addition. Please show the use of the room on the plan. It appears to be a bedroom. Please revise the note on sheet 2 to include battery back up type smoke detectors when hardwired in the new areas of construction. Please show the location of the required smoke detectors in the proposed room addition. Per the City of Carlsbad policy all new residential buildings, including additions, require a soils report. Please submit two copies. Exception: If a room addition is limited to one story and 1000 sq. ft. in area, then a soils report is not required. The proposed 2nd story addition may require a soils report depending on existing condition. Please provide evidence from the Building Department that the soils report will be waived for this project or provide the soils report as stated above. Please show that the openings between railings at the deck guardrail shall be less than 4". Please show the deck covering material and the following: Manufacturer's name. Product name/number. ICBO approval' number, or equal. Carlsbad 98-2101 7/17/98 Show roof drains and overflows. Sections 1506.2 and 1506.3. Please show on the plans per the City of Carlsbad request that overflow roof drains shall terminate in an area where they will be readily visible and will not cause damage to the building. If the roof drain terminates through a wall, the overflow drain shall terminate 12" minimum above the roof drain. Policy 84- 35. Please provide design and calculations from a licensed engineer or architect for the design of the 2x6 cantilever deck joists. Please detail the fastening to the floor joists. Please also include in the calculations the size of the existing garage door header or a revised sized header to support the increased loads above. Show attic ventilation. Minimum vent area is 1/150 of attic area (or 1/300 of attic area if at least 50% of the required vent is at least 3 feet above eave vents or cornice vents). Show area required and area provided. Section 15053. Please show the thickness and index rating of the floor sheathing and the nailing schedule. Please revise the header size over the sliding glass door that receives the post load from the ridge beam above to a minimum 4x12. Please show bearing for the header support to the foundation below and also at the other end of the ridge beam. Please show a diagonal brace from the top plates to the rafters minimum every 4'-0" at the exterior wall where the pony wall is stacked on the 8'-0" wall. Please show solid sheathing applied to the pony wall. Please show a new switch to .control a light or receptacle in the existing mstr. bedroom at the relocated door. Provide fluorescent general lighting (40 lumens per watt minimum) in the bathroom. Provide a note on the plans: In showers and tub-shower combinations, control valves must be pressure balanced or thermostatic mixing valves. UPC Section 410.7 Please show a minimum of 30" wide space centered on the water closet. The regulations require a properly completed and properly signed Form CF-lR to.be either imprinted on the plans, taped to the plans or "sticky backed" on the plans, to allow the .building inspector to readily compare the actual construction with the requirements of the approved energy design. All energy items shown on the plans must be in agreement with the information shown on the properly completed Form CF-IR. Carlsbad 98-2101. 7/17/98 Specify on the building plans all of the mandatory energy conservation requirements as listed on the enclosure titled, "Mandatory Measures Checklist". Provide a note on the plans stating "All new glazing (fenestration,) will be installed with a certifying, label attached, showing the U-value." To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: Yes U No U The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 619/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Mike Puckett at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. MINIMUM CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS These are minimum specifications established by the Uniform Building Code. These specifications apply in the absence of more restrictive specifications in the approved plans. Code sections listed refer to the 1994 edition of the UBC 1. FOUNDATION AND UNDERFLOOR I. Concrete. Strength. Concrete .for footings must. have minimum compressive strength of 2500 psi at 28 days and composed of: 1 part cement, 2 112 parts sand, 3 1/2 parts of 3/4" maximum size rock with not more than 7 gallons of water per sack of cement. Wood and Earth Separation. Foundations supporting- wood must extend at least 6" above the adjacent finish grade. [UBC Section 1806.1] Provide 18" clearance under wood joists and 12" clearance under wood girders which are not pressure treated. [UBC Section 2317.3] Concrete Slabs. Slabs on grade must be at least 3 1/2" thick. [UBC Section.1924] Treated Wood. All foundation plates or sills and sleepers on concrete or masonry which is in direct contact with earth must be pressure-treated wood or foundation grade redwood. Wood joists closer than 18", or wood girders or supports closer than 12" to the ground, must be pressure treated. [UBC Section 2317.4] Anchor Bolts and Footing Sills. All sills must have full bearing on the footing wall or slab and must be bolted to the foundation with 1/2" nominal diameter steel bolts embedded at least 7" into the concrete or reinforced masonry or 15" into unreinforced grouted masonry. Bolts must be spaced. not to exceed 6 on center. There must be 2 bolts per piece with bolts not over 12" from cut end of sills. (UBC Section 1806.6] Underfloor Vents. Underfloor areas must be ventilated by openings in foundation walls.. Wall openings must have ,a net area of not less than 1 sq. ft. for each 150 sq. ft. of underfloor area. Openings must be arranged to provide cross ventilation and must be covered with corrosion- resistant wire mesh with openings of 1/4-inch in dimension. [UBC Section 2317.7]. Underfloor Access. Underfloor areas must be provided with an unobstructed crawl hole not less than 18" x 24". Openings must be effectively screened or covered. [UBC Section 2317.3]. H. WOOD FRAMING Lumber. All joist, rafters, beams, and posts 2" to 4" thick must be No.2 Grade Douglas Fir-Larch or better. All posts and beams 5" and thicker must be No. I Grade Douglas Fir- Larch or betters (See item 13 in this section for lumber grading requirements for studs.) Wall bracing. Every exterior wood stud wall and main cross partitions must be braced at each end and at least at every 25 feet of length with Ix 4 diagonal let-in braces o equivalent. [UBC Section 2326.11.3, 2326.11.4, Table 23- I-W]. Lateral Support. Floor joists and rafters more than 10" ir depth and spanning more than 8 feet must be supporter laterally by bridging or solid blocking,af intervals no exceeding 8 feet. UBC Section 2306.7]. Blocking. Provide blocking at ends and at supports of floo joists, and for rafters at exterior walls. [UBC Sectior 2326.8.6]. Roof Blocking. Provide 2" full depth solid blocking a ridge line and at exterior walls on trussed roofs. [UBC Section 2326.12.8]. Double Joists. Floor joists must be double under bearin partitions running parallel with the joists. [UBC Sectio 2326.8.5]. Ratter Purliri Braces. Purlin braces shall be not less tha. 45 degrees to the horizontal. [UBC Section 2326.12.7]. S. Rafter Ties. Rafter ties must be spaced not more than , feet on center where rafters and ceiling joists are nc parallel. [UBC Section 2326.12.6). Clearance. Provide 1/2" minimum clearances between to: plate of interior non-bearing partitions and bottom chord c trusses. Top Plate. Provide double top plate with minimum 48" la splice. [UBC Section 2326.11.2]. -Nailing. Nailing-shall be in-compliance with UBC Tab! 23-I-Q. A copy of this table is reproduced on page 4. Fire Blocks. Fire blocks must be provided for walls ceilings, floor levels and concealed spaces at 10' 0. horizontally. [UBC Section 708.2.1]. Studs. In one and two story buildings, studs for exteri' walls and interior bearing walls must be not less than 2"x at 16" o.c. Studs for interior non-bearing partitions may I 2"x3" at 16" o.c. Studs 2" -to 4" thick, 2" to 4" wide arid n more than 8 feet long must be "stud grade" Douglas Larch or better when supporting not more than one fib and a roof. Studs for beaaring walls must not exceed 8 fe in height. [UBC Section 2326.11.1, Table 23-I-R31. Laminated Wood. An AITC Certificate of COflf0111u1 for glued laminated wood members must be given to 4/96 CM 1 of 4 'Building Inspector prior to their installation. [UBC Section 2305]. III. GENERAL MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS. Mortar Mix. Mortar to be used for construction of masonry walls, foundation walls and retaining walls must be 1800 psi minimum and may consist of: I part Portland cement, 3 1/2 parts sand, and 1/4 part hydrated lime or lime putty. Plasticcement may be used with I part* plastic cement to 2 1/4 to 3 parts sand. [UBC Table 21-A, UBC Standard 2 1 -15 ] Grout Mix. The mix for the grout may be: I part Portland cement, .3 parts sand, 1/10 part hydrated lime or lime putty, I to 2 parts pea gravel (3/8" maximum). .Water added to pouring consistency without segregation of grout constituents. [UBC Table 21-B] The use of plastic cement is not allowed for grout. [UBC Section 2103.5] Masonry. The masonry units must comply with ASTM Spec. C90-75, Grade N for hollow unit concrete blocks. [UBC Standard 21-4) Structural Steel. Steel used as structural shapes such as wide flange sections, channels, plates and angles must comply with ASTM Spec. A-36. Pipe columns must comply with ASTM Spec. A-53. [UBC Standard 22-1]. IV. ROOFING AND WEATHERPROOFING. I. Wood Siding. All wood siding must be placed over an approved, weather-resistive barrier. [UBC Section 1402.1] Flashing Around Openings. Every opening in any exterior wall must be flashed with sheet metal or waterproof building paper. UBC Section 1402.2. Building Newsletter 17-2] Roof Covering. Mineral-surfaced, built-up roofing must not be installed on roof having a pitch greater than 3 inches to 12 inches. The following are minimum pitches: composition shingles: minimum 2 inches to 12 inches; wood shingles: minimum 3inches to 12 inches; wood shakes: minimum 4 inches to 12 inches; roofing tile: minimum 2'h inches to 12 inches; clay or concrete roofing tile: minimum 4 inches to 12 inches. Wood shingles ar wood shakes must be pressure-impregnated with chemica to obtain a Class C rating. [UBC Section 1504 and Tabi 15-B-I, 15-B-2, and 15-D-1] Weep Screed. A weep screed must be provided at ti foundation plate line for all weather-exposed exterior sn walls finished on the exterior with stucco. [UBC Secti '2506.5] Basement Walls. Basement foundation walls below gra must be damp-proofed on the outside. [UBC Secti 1402.4] V. GENERAL Attic Access. Attic areas over 30" high must be accessil by an opening not less than 22" x 30'. With a furnace in t attic, the opening must not be less than 30" x 30". [UI Section 1505, 1, UMC Section 319.3] Shower Enclosures. Shower walls must be finished t height of 70" above the drain inlet with a smooth, hard, n absorbent surface. [UBC Section 807.1.3] Electric Meter Enclosure. Contact San Diego Gas Electric Company, Customer Extension Plann Department, for meter location. All wiring must corn with the 1993 National Electrical Code. Smoke Detectors. In new constmction, smoke detect must receive their primary power from the building wit when such wiring is served from a commercial sou Smoke detectors may be battery-operated whet installe existing buildings, buildings without commercial power building which undergo alterations, repairs oradditi regulated by UBC Section 310.9. In dwelling unit detector shall be installed in each sleeping room centrally located in the corridor or area giving acces each separate sleeping area, in each story and in basement. Where the ceiling height of a room open tc hallway serving the bedrooms exceeds that of the hall by 24" or more, smoke detectors shall be installed ir hallway and the adj'ac'ent room. Detectors shall soun alarm audible in all sleeping rooms. (UBC Section 31 VI. TABLES TABLE 18.1-D FOUNDATIONS FOR STUD BEARING WALLS. MI?'IMUM REQUIREMENTS' Number of Floors Supported by the Foundation' Thickness of Foundation Wall (inches) Width of Footing (inches) S Thickness of Footing (inches) Depth Below UndiStU1 Ground Surface (inchc Concrete Unit Masonry 1 6 6 12 6 12 2 8 8 15 7 3 10 10 18 8 24 ...........I .A....... ... .....,A r,,.....i--------i.11 .. I 2I. I IT IIçIC UIIU)U&M UIIUILIUIt3 UI IIU)I IJIIUIIIon. W IVUflU, $UUWI6J WIU IUUIUflhIUII) )IIdJI I.)'.. S.) 1.U%SJ •I UIIW I UWW.I. The ground under the floor may be excavated to the elevation of the top of the footing. 'Interior stud bearing wails may be supported by isolated footings. The footing width and length shall be twice the width shown in this table and the footings spaced not more than 6 feet on center. 'Foundations may support a roof in addition to the stipulated number of floors. Foundations supporting roofs only shall be as required for supporting one floor 4/96 CM 2 of 4 TABLE 23.1-Q NAILING SCHEDULE CONNECTION . NAILING' I. Joist to sill or girder, toenail 3-8d Bridging to joist, toenail each end . . 2-8d Ix6 subfloor or less to each joist, face nail 2-8d 4.' Wider than VxV subfloor to each joist, face nail 3-8d S. 2 subfloor to joist or girder, blind and face nail 2-16d Sole plate to joist or blocking, typical face nail Sole plate to joist or blocking, at braced wall panels 16d at 16' o.c. . 3-16d per 16' Top plate to stud, end nail . . 2-16d S. Stud to sole plate . 4-8d, toenail or 2-16d, end nail Double studs, face nail . I6d at 24' o.c. Doubled top plates, typical face nail . . . 16d at 16' o.c. Doubled top plates, lap splice . 8-16d Blocking between joists or rafters to top plate, toenail . . 3-8d Rim joist to top plate, toenail . Sd at 6' o.c. Top plates, laps and intersections, face nail . 2-16d Continuous header, two pieces . 16d at 16 o.c. along each edge Ceiling joists to plate, toenail . 3-8d Continuous header to stud, toenail . . 4-8d Ceiling joists, laps over partitions, face nail 3-16d IS.. Ceiling joists to parallel rafters, face nail . . . 3-16d Rafter to plate, toenail . 3-8d 1' brace to each stud and plate, face nail . . 2-8d l'xS' sheathing or less to each bearing, face nail . : •. 2-8d 2.2. Wider than L'xS' sheathing to each bearing, face nail . . . 349d Built-up corner studs . . . 16d at 24' O.C. Built-up girder and beams . . . 20d at 32' o.c. at top and bottom and staggered 2-20d at ends and at each splice 2* planks ' ' . . . . . 2-l6dax each bearing 26.Wood structural panels and particleboard:2 Subfloor, too fand wall sheathing (to framing): or less . . . 6d 9132'-W . . . 8d' or 6d' 5d 1¼'P/.' . . 10d4 or8d - Combination sub floor-underlayment (to framing): W and less ' 6 'Il_-I' . . Sd 1w-tv: . . . 10d4 or Sd Panel siding (to framing): . Yi'orless . ' 6d Sd Fiberboard sheathing:' N o. 1lga 6' No. 16 ga 25/32' , No. II ga Sc N o. l6ga Interior paneling 3,4' . 4d 6e 4/96 CM 3 of 4 TABLE 234-Q NAILING SCHEDULE (CONTINUED) 'Common or box nails may be used except where otherwise stated. spaced at 6 inches on center at edges, 12 inches at intermediate supports except 6 inches at all supports where spans ate 48 inches or more. For nailing of woc structural panel and partileboard diaphragms and shear walls, refer to Section 2314.3. Nails for wall sheathing may be common, box or casing. 'Common or deformed shank. 'Common. 'Deformed shank. 'Corrosion-resistant siding or casing nails conforming to the requirements of Section 2325.1 'Fasteners spaced 3 inches on center at exterior edges and 6 inches on center at intermediate supports. 'Corrosion-resistant rooting.nails with 7/16-Inch-diameter head and I '1,-inch length for '1,-inch sheathing and 1%-inch length for 25/32-inch sheathing conforming to t requirements of Section 2325.1 'Corrosion-resistant staples with nominal 7/16-inch crown and 1¼-inch length for '/,-inch sheathing and 1'/,-inch length fur-25132-inch sheathing conforming to ti requirements of Section 2325;1 '°Pancl supports at 16 inches [20 inches if strength axis in the long direction of the panel, unless otherwise marked). Casing or finish nails spaced 6 inches on panel edge 12 inches at intermediate supports. "Panel supports at 24 inches. Casing or finish nails spaced 6 inches on panel edges, 12 inches at intermediate supports. TABLE 23-1-S-I -ALLOWABLE SPANS AND LOADS FOR WOOD STRUCTURAL PANEL SHEATHING AND SING LE-FLOOR GRADE CONTINUOI. OVER TWO OR MORE SPANS WITH STRENGTH AXIS PERPENDICULAR TO SUPPORTS'S' Sheathing Grades Roof' Floor' Panel Span Rating Panel Thickness (inches) Maximum Span (inches) Load' (pounds per sq.ft.) Maximum Span (inches) Load Ro&'Floor Span With Edge Support' Without Edge Support Total Live Load 1210 5/16 12 .12 40 30 0 16/0 . 5/16.% 16 16 40 30 0 20/0 5/16,% 20 20 . 40 30 0 24/0 . %.7116.'Iz 24 . 20' 40 30 0 24/16 7116.1/2 24 24 50 40 16 32/16 1S/32.'A.% 32 28 40 30 16' 40/20 19/32,%,'/4,'I . 40 32 40 . •30 20" 48/24 . 23/32.'/i,% 48 36 45 35 24 54/32 . ',4.l . 54 40 45 35 32 60/48 /,.l.1¼ 60 48 45 35 48 Single-Floor Grades . Roof' Floor' Pane! Span Rating (inches) Panel Thickness (inches) Maximum Span Cinches) Load'(poundsper sq.&) Maximum Span (inches) Load With Edge Support6 Without Edge .Support Total Live Load 16 o '/,19/32,% .24 24 50 40 16' 20oc 19/32,%,'h 32 43 . 40 30 20'-' 240c 23/32.'fl 48 36 35 25 24 32oc '4,l 48 40 50 40, 32 48oc 13/32,1¼ 60 48 50 50 48 'Applies to panels 24 inches or wider. Floor and roof sheathing conforming with this table shall be deemed to meet the design criteria of Section 2321. 'Uniform load deflection limitations 1/180 of span under live load plus dead toad, 1/240 under live load only. 'Panel edges shall have approved tongue-and-groove joints or shall be supported with blocking unless 'fl-inch minimum thickness underlayment or 11/3 inches of apprc cellular or lightweight concrete is placed over the subfloor. or finish floor is 'fl-inch wood strip. Allowable unilorrnload based on deflection of 1/360 of span is 100 pot: per square foot (psf) except the span rating of 48 inches on center is based on a total load of 65 psf. sAllowable load at maximum span. . . 'Tongue-and-groove edges, panel edge clips [one midway between each support, except two equally spaced between supports 48 inches on center], lumber bloCk,n other. Only lumber blocking shall satisfy blocked diaphragms requirements. 'For '/,-inch panel, maximum span shall be 24 inches. 'May be 24 inches on center where 'h-inch wood strip flooring is installed at right angles to joist. 'May be 24 inches on center for floors where 1'/, inches of cellular or lightweight concrete is applied over panels. 4/96CM 4 of 4 SPECIAL INSPECTION PROGRAM , ADDRESS OR LEGAL DESCRIPTION: X105L JJ.k?S Wnj PLAN CHECK NUMBER: OWNER'S NAME: Si I, as the owner, or agent of the owner (contractors may not employ the special inspector), certify that I, or the architect/engineer of record, will be responsible for employing the special inspector(s) as required by Uniform BuildgCo,p (UBC) Sectioh 1701.1 for the construction project located at the site listed above. UBC Si6fi# i"0.6.3'5. Signed (I,/A4"1/V 7 I, as the engineer/architect of record, certify that I have prepared the following special inspection program as required by UBC Section 106.3.5 for the construction project located at the .Jte listed above. Eoge1As Seal / &$ Sianerj1 f No. 1155 Exp. 12-31 1. List of work requiring special inspection: El Soils Compliance Prior to Foundation Inspection El Field Welding El Structural Concrete Over 2500 PSI El High Strength Bolting ' El Prestressed Concrete Expansion/Epoxy Anchors El Structural Masonry El Sprayed-On Fireproofing El Designer Specified El Other 2. Name(s) of individual(s) or firm(s) responsible for the special inspections listed above: tti-t ttis4_ I.c ci:ruruf 'Tl o&c / (&ts i-o , ,* - 0105-- 3. Duties of the special inspectors for the work listed above: 4b Special inspectors shall check in with the City and present their credentials for approval prior to beginning work on the job site. SIP 4997 Carlsbad 98-2101 7/17/98 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 98-2101. PREPARED BY: Mike Puckett DATE: 7/17/98 BUILDING ADDRESS: 2102 Janis Way BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R3 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN BUILDING PORTION BUILDING AREA VALUATION MULTIPLIER VALUE -Room Add 321 98.00 31,458.00 Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE j31458.00 F1.1994 UBC Building Permit Fee • Bldg. Permit Fee by ordinance: $ 288.93 U.1994 UBC Plan Check Fee • Plan Check Fee by ordinance: $ 187.80 Type of Review: LII Complete Review U Structural. Only U Hourly U Repetitive Fee Applicable U Other: . Esgil Plan Review Fee: $ 150.24 Comments: Sheet I of I macvalue.doc 5196 City of Carlsbad BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST DATE: PLANCHECK NO.: CB BUILDING ADDRESS: 0 j p PROJECT DESCRIPTION: R ,Av..D ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: /(Q 74Q-? EST. VALUE: 3/ ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to build. A Right-of-Way permit is required prior to construction of the following improvements: DENIAL Please sp(i attached report of deficiencies marked tt'U. )1ake necessary corrections to plans or spedificàtieiis for compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. By Date: By: Date: By: Date: FOR OFFICIAL USEONLY ENGINEERING AVTHORIZATION TO ISSUE BUILDING PERMIT: By: 7 , Date: ATTACHMENTS Dedication Application Dedication Checklist Improvement Application Improvement Checklist Future Improvement Agreement Grading Permit Application Grading Submittal Checklist ENGINEERING DEPT. CONTACT PERSON Name: Danna Trigs City of Carlsbad Address: 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA-92009 Phone: (619)438-1161, ext. 4374 CFD INFORMATION Parcel Map No: Lots: Right-of-Way Permit Application Recordation: Right-of-Way Permit Submittal Checklist Carlsbad Tract: and Information Sheet Sewer Fee Information Sheet A-4 b bUflg ncne CKt H\woRDc Las aimas r.• ôlsbad, CA 92009- 1576 (760) 438-1161 • FAX (760) 69 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST SITE PLAN STJ 2ND/ RDV • 1. P ovide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: row ?proenec 3 1~r & Proposed Structures senents Street Improvements - . .-.. Right-of-Way 3triv J. eway widths 2. Show on site plan: 1rainage PatternsfF 1. Building pad surface drainage must maintain a minimum slope of one percent towards an adjoining street or an approved drainage course. 6 2. ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE: "Finish grade will provide a minimum positive drainage of 2% to swale 5'away from building." 1Existing & Proposed Slopes and Topography . 3. Include on title sheet: 21te address 2ssessor's Parcel Number c'Legai Description For commercial/industrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, include: total building square footage with the square footage for each different use, existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing, warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved. EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE 4a. Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of approval for Project No. Ab. All conditions are in compliance H:\WORD00CS\CHKLST\8uikJ jag Pantheck CkIs( 8P0001 Earn, OT.doc •2 Date: O(,&t\i v,ev Lc'T z3 es Rev. 12126/96 bc3e? 14c2— - BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS 1STI 2NDI 3R0/ - 5. Dedication for all street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the building site and any storm drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and for remodels with a value at or exceeding $_, pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.030: Dedication required as follows: Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8 'A" x 11" plat map and submit with a title report. All easement documents must be approved and signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process: Submit the completed application form with the required checklist items and fees to the Engineering Department in person. Applications will not be accept by mail or fax. Dedication completed by: Date: IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the construction exceeds $_, pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.040. Public improvements required as follows: Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public improvement requirements. A registered Civil Engineer must prepare the appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements on the attached checklist to the Engineering Department through a separate plan check process. The completed application form and the requirements on the checklist must be submitted in person. Applications by mail or fax are not accepted. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of building permit. Improvement Plans signed by: Date: Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title report or current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $' so we may prepare the necessary Future Improvement Agreement. This agreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building permit. • Future public improvements required as follows: H:\WORD\DOCS\CHKLSTsBuHding Ptantheck Cktst 8P0001 Form DT.doc 3 Rev. 12126/96 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST, 1 stl 2'' 3rd./ Enclosed please find your Future Improvement Agreement. agreement signed and notarized to the Engineering Department. Future Improvement Agreement completed by: Date: Please return No Public Improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or defective improvements found adjacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction of the City Inspector prior to occupancy. GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section 11.06.030 of the Municipal Code. L11 U L11 7a. Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading requirements. Include accurate grading quantities (cut, fill import, export). Write "No Grading" on plot plan if none is required. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer must be submitted togeher with the completed application form attached. NOTE: The Grading Permit must be issued and rough grading approval obtained prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Grading Inspector sign off by: Date: Graded Pad Certification required. (Note: Pad certification may be required even if a grading permit is not required.) Q El 7d.No Grading Permit required. 7e.lf grading is not required, write "No Grading" on plot plan. MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS . 8. A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-Way and/or private work adjacent to the public Right-of-Way. Types of work include, but are not limited to: street improvements, tree trimming, driveway construction, tieing into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities. Right-of-Way permit required for: Plancheck Cklst BP000I Form D1'.doc - 4 Roe. 12/26196 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST st/ 2ndl 3rd/ U0 A SEWER PERMIT is-required concurrent with the building permit issuance. The fee is noted in the fees section on the following page. INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT If your facility is located in the City of Carlsbad sewer service area, you need to contact the Carlsbad Municipal Water District, located at 5950 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008. District personnel can provide forms and assistance, and will check to see if your business enterprise is on the EWA Exempt List. You may telephone (760) 438-2722, extension 153, for assistance. Industrial Waste permit accepted by: Date: E1U NPDES PERMIT Complies with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant shall provide best management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever occurs first. Q Required fees are attached U No fees required Additional Comments: H:\WORODOCS\CHKLST\BujkJing Plantheck Cklsl BP000I Fo,m DT.doc 5 Re 12/26/96 . •'% '- PLANNING DEPARTMENT BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST Plan Check No. CB 39.).10.I Address 2JO2_J'sr'r (Jay Planner Greg Fisher Phone (61 9) 438-1161, extension 4328 APN: l.7-?.L16Z3 - Type of Project and Use: gQOft .OJ;tf(Jl Zone: A - Facilities Management Zone: .L CFD (in/out) # Circle One (if property in, complete SPECIAL TAX CALCULATION WORKSHEET provided by Building' Department.) Legend Item Complete . 'Item Incomplete - Needs .our action Envirómenial Review Required: YES ___ NO TYPE DATE OF COMPLETION: Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval - $ Discretionary Action Required: YES NO- _•. TYPE APPROVAL/RESO. NO. DATE PROJECT NO. S OTHER RELATED CASES: ',-Cdmpliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Condit-ions of Approval - Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance Pro~t7ste located in Coastal Zone? YES _ CA 'CoasitCommission Authority? YES ' NO____ If California Co\stal Commission Authority: . Contact them at - 3111 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 200,-San Diego 92108-1725; (619) 521t8036 -. . " •'Y' '-' -Determine status oastal Permit Required-or Exempt):- Coastal Permit Dete!ation Form already completed? YES NO____ If NO, complete Coastal Per Deterr ,ihation Form now. s. . •- /N.. --Coastal Permit Determinati .Log # Follow-Up Actions: 1) Stamp\Building Plans as "Exempt" or "Coastal Permit Required" (at minimum Floor Plans).\ 2) Complete Castal PërnitDetermination Log as needed. - # 5 Inclusionary Housing Fee required: YES NO (Effective date of Inclusionary Housing Ordinance - May 21, 1993.) I Date Entry Completed? YES NO Site Plan: Provide a fully dimensional site plan drawn to scale. ' Show: North arrow,, property lines, easements, existing "and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way width, dimensional 'setbacks and existing topographical lines. Provide legal description of property and assessor's parcel number. Zoning: S Setbacks: Front: , Required Z.O Shown Int. Side: , Required 10' Shown Street Side: Required. - Shown Rear: Required Shown Accessory Structure Setbacks: Front: _—R'quired Shown Int. Side:— Required Shown Stre Required Shown ear: Required Shown FE LII 3. Lot Coverage: Required Shown ffCO E 4. Height: Required 30 Shown C-, 5. Parking: Spaces Required Shown Guest Spaces Required 1 Shown J7 7E Additional Comments_____________________________________ OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO DATE 421;~l IFE-W--"-g jo- WE FROM: PHONE NO. : 51 442 7059 Oct.. f21398 06: 26PM F'2 - - SGCSiiii/and_Geotechmcal Consultan.Li cctober'12 1998 S Project No. 106.G1 Ms. Lynn Stanton 21O2 Janis Way . Carlsbad, California 9200.8 Subject: Limited Soils Evaluation, Proposed Second-Story Addition to Residential . . Garage, 2102 Janis Way, Carlsbad, California (C898-2101) inroducn Southland Geotechriical Consultants has performed a limited soils evaluation for a proposed second-story addition to a garage at the single-family residential property at 2102 Janis Way in Carlsbad. This report presents a summary of our limited soils .evaluation and our conclusions and recommendations relative to the proposed development. . . Scope ofejvi.ces . . S. The scope of our limited soils evaluation included the following: - Review of geotechnical maps and literature pertaining to the site and vicinity. A list of the documents reviewed is presented in Appendix A. Field reconnaissance- to observe the existing surficial soil conditions at the site and in the general site vicinity. Investigation -o"he near-surface soil conditions at the site by man'u'ally excavating three exploratory pits. The pits were logged and sampled by a geologist from our firm. - . Laboratory expansion index testing of a representative sample of the onsite soils. - - Geotechnical analysis of the data obtained. - Preparation of this report summarizing the results of our limited soils evaluation and presenting conclusions and recommendations, from a geotechnical standpoint, regarding the proposed constructin, -- F,FOI. FHOIIE I'lO. j' Ti9 0ct. 12 1998 06: 36PM K. Protect No. 106G51 Prrct Pcritin - The subject property is located at. 2102 Janis Way in Carlsbad, California (see Figure 1). The single-family residential property is located on the northerly side of Janis Way and is bounded by residential properties to the north, east and west.. The proposed addition is planned above an existing garage at the property. The garage appears to occupy a relatively level, "cut" pad. J The proposed secondory addition will be built above the garage and will us the existing"garage foundations for support. We understand that the adequacy of the existing foundations to support the additional loading was evaluated by the structural engineer for the project. We also understand that no new footings are proposed for support of the addition. Subsurface lnvestigationand Laboratory Jesting On Stember 24, 1998, three exploratory pits were manually excavated at the site. The exploratory pits were excavated to a maximum depth of 22 inches below the existing ground surface. The exploratory pits were logged by a geologist from our firm. -Samples ofthè soils encountered during the subsurface investigation were . obtained, for laboratory testing. The approximate locations of the exploratory pits are indicated on the Site Plan (Figure 2). Logt of the exploratory pits are presented on Figure 3. Subsequent to logging and sampling, the pits were backfilled. 'Laboratory expansion index testing of a representative sample of the onsite soils (Sample 1 from Pit 1) was performed in general accordance with UBC Standard No. 29-2. The results of the test yielded an expansion index of "0" and an expansion potential of 'very low". Soii/Ge*gic UniLS .. •. - - :. TI... As encountered in-our exploratory pits, the project Site appears to be underlain by topsoil and Quaternary-aged terrace deposits named the "Lindavista Formation" - (Appendix A, Reference 3), Following are brief description of the units.- . 2 F'RI:Ll PHONE NO. 619 442 7859 Oct.. 12 1998 EftE: 27PM P4 Project No. 106G51 TosVail - Topsoil, developed on and gradational with the underlying fort-national sandstone, was encountered in exploratory pit 1. The topsoil generally consisted of Jight brown to red-brown, dense, silty fine to coarse sand with gravel. Lindavi1a Formatioti - The Lindavista Formation is the bedrock unit that appears - to ..underli. .e_project area. The Lindavista Formation encountered on site generally consisted of red-brown, very dense silty fine to medium sandstone and was locally cemented. The LiñdaVista Formation is considered suVitablefr, the support of structural loads. ._- Based on the results of our limited soils evaluation, it is our opinion that construction the proposed dditiV is feasible from a geotechnic& standpoint.. The following sections provide the requested geotechnical recommendations that should be considered for design and construction of the proposed project. Expansion Potential Laboratory expansion index testing of a representative sample of the onsite soils yielded an expansion index of "0" and an expansion potential of "very low". The soils. at the site are not considered expansive and special foundation recommendations for mitigation of the effects of expansive soils are not needed. ring. Gpacity V V V We understand that the proposed addition will be supported by the existing garage foundations and no new foundations are proposed. Based on our limited soils Vevaluation and previous experience, it is our opinion that a soil-bearing value of 1,500 pounds per square foot may be assumed for footings that extend a minimum .01 12 inches beloW the, lowest adjacent grade. This value maybe increased by one- third for loads of short duration, such as wind or seismic forces. 3 FROM -:- - V - V PHONE N. :-Edcl 442, 7859 Oct. 12 998 05:2E:FF1 P5 Project No. 106G51 teralResistan- Footings and slabs founded in the firm, natural Lindavista Formation-soils may be designed for a passive lateral bearing pressure of .350 pounds per square foot per foot of depth. A coefficient of friction against sliding between concrete and soil of 0.4 may be assumed. These values may be increased by one-third when considering loads of short duration, such as wind or seismic forces, - If you have any questions regarding our report, please call. We appreciate the .'.Opportunity to be-of -service. Sincerely, . V -.. ..,. SOUTHLAND GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS V - / Susan E. Tanges, CEG 1 386 Charles R. Corbin, RCE 363O2 - Managing Principal/Engineering Geologist Project Engineer Attachments: Figure 1 - Site Location Map .. Figure 2 - Project Site Sketch V Figure 3 - Exploratory Pit Logs - ...•. - •. Appendix A - References . V Distrbution: 4 (31 Addressee, (1) via fax, 760-434-0871 (1) Ideal Construction,-via fax, 760-434-0247 - - FROM ..: .' PHONE NO. : 519 442 7859 Oct., 12 1998 06:2SPM P6 Tsb"' .w. Ts ,. r I •-s ' Ii \' 71 - . ..........'- . - . / .' '4. \ 1 " ..• . ,. . .., . Ool/ '•',,\ ,g \l,._ I + -, - ---- / :- - - - J% Id Q Iv C of / : ' \ I' ¶, 1 — \; I( Me -, - •. "" ----- -: -=- - sk N. Pe "•' ' ': _L\ -"S..... ''•IC-4" ..'- .... S.S .t . ..l \'N k,.. AD ?_ , • QtIYS - Kni ._•% 9% :'• (1 '°Ts b 2;'= fl J• . 2' Id -- l'o\'-.. Tsb- / . b Oa t 711 Y. ' iJ t of: T0 i - - \-; - Qbç Tsb '(7) SITE LOCATION MAP -..Project No. 106G51 Stanton Residence, Second-Story Addition Scale (approximate): 1 irc-h_-=.2,000 feet Base map adapted from Weber, F.H, Jr., 1982, Recent slope failures, ancient landslides and related geology of the north-central coastal area of San Diego ,.. --County, California (CDM(3 OFR 8212LA) FIGURE FROM : .- --. PHONE NO. : 1.9 42 759 clot. 2 1998 05:29PM F? / EXISTING RESIDENCE (ADDITION ABOVE) - . - EXISTING GAGE z 0 CL P-3 P-1 .P2 :... - PROJECT SITE SKETCH Project No. 106G51 . . - - • LEGEND Stanton Residence, Second-Story. Addition -. . . Approximate location of Scale (approximate): 1 inch = 4 feet . P-3 exploratory pit Base-.map adapted from field measurements made by SGC representative on 9-24-98 and from review of project plan available from client FIGURE 2 FROM - .• PHONE NO.. :C119 442 7E5 Oct. 12 99E:06:29PM PS .. - Project No. 106G51 LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS PIT NO, DEPTH DESCRIPTLQ --- 0-6" Igil - Light brown to red-brown, dry, dense, silty fine to coarse sand (SM); with gravel -• Lindavista Formatjn - Red-brown, damp, dense to very dense.(density increases with depth), silty fine to medium sandstone (SM); cemented -. . Total depth 22 inches No groundwater encountered Excavated and backfilled 9-24-98 . SampFe 1 (Lindavista Formation) at 12" Sample 2 (Lindavista Formation) at 22" ---------------------- 0-15" - Ljdavista Formation - Red-brown, damp, dense to very dense (density . increases with depth), silty fine to medium sandstone (SM); cemented Total depth = 15 inches Refusal on cemented Lindavista Formation sandstone No groundwater encountered Excavated and backtilled 9-24-98 P-3 - ....'- - 0-2" Ljudaiista Formation - Red-brown, damp, very dense to hard, silty fine to medium sandstone (SM) cemented Total depth = 2 inches Refusal on cemented Lindavista Formation sandstone No groundwater encountered Excavated and backfilled 9-24-98 1 FIGURE 3 FROM : PHONE t,16.: 19 442 7859 Oct. 12 1998 06:3E1PM p - - Project No. 106G51 AERENDI)LA REFERENCES Southland Geotechnical Consultants, In-house geotechnical information. Tan, S.S., andriffen, D., 1995, Landslide hazards in the northern part o f t h e San Diego metropolitan area, San Diego County California: California Di v i s i o n of--Mines and Geology, Open-file Report 95-04. Weber, F.H., Jr., 1982, Recent slope failures, ancient landslides and rela t e d geology of the north-central coastal area of San Diego County, California: California Divisibf Mines and Geology, Open-file Report 82-1 2LA. 0 :- 2075 LAS PALMAS DR Ph, (760)438-1161 ext 4503 FAX(760)438-0894 Fax To: Ideal Construction From: Patrick Kelley Fax: 434-0247 Pages: 1 Phone:438-0470 Date: August 21, 1998 Re: CB98-2101 CC: File El Urgent x For Review El Please Comment 0 Please Reply 0 Please Recycle Comments: In conducting a site inspection pursuant to your request to waive the required soils report on the above project, a couple of serious inconsistencies with the proposed plans and existing construction were observed. It appears the existing foundation system is a masonry stem at least 48" tall above the footings, and the proposed plans do not reflect that condition. It does not appear that the consulting structural engineer has reviewed this stem foundation system to ascertain whether the as-built foundation and its reinforcement can sustain additional loading. And a lateral analysis of the existing foundation system should be done to ensure the existing first floor shear resisting system can sustain additional loading. Additionally, the west elevation does not accurately depict the existing condition of the first floor wall adjacent to the garage door. Please provide accurate depiction's of all existing conditions on the structure in order for a plan review to incorporate all conditions. No waiver of the soils report requirement can be granted on this project. S