The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2121 PLACIDO CT; ; CB022379; PermitCity of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 12-19;20G2 Residential Permit Permit No: CB022379 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 Job Address: Permit Type: Parcel No: Valuation: Occupancy Group: # Dwelling Units: Bedrooms: Project Title: 2121 PLACIDO CT CBAD RESDNTL Sub Type: RAD 2164920600 Lot #: 0 $246,173.00 Construction Type: NEW Reference #: 0 Structure Type: 0 Bathrooms: 0 DONALD-WELSHONSD RES/752 SF REMOD, 2171 SF NEW ADDITION Status: ISSUED Applied: 08/15/2002 Entered By: CB Plan Approved: 12/19/2002 Issued: 12/19/2002 Inspect Area: Orig PC#: Plan Check#: Applicant: Owner: BEVERLY DONALD K&WELSHONS KIM BEVERLY DONALD K&WELSHNKJJW19/02 0002 01 02 COP 1262.37 2121 PLACIDOCT 2121 PLACIDOCT CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 438-2963 Building Permit $999.32 Meter Size Add'l Building Permit Fee $0.00 AddI Red. Water Con. Fee $0.00 Plan Check $649.56 Meter Fee $0.00 Add'I Plan Check Fee $0.00 SDCWA Fee $0.00 Plan Check Discount $0.00 CFD Payoff Fee $0.00 Strong Motion Fee $24.62 PFF $0.00 Park in Lieu Fee $0.00 PFF (CFD Fund) $0.00 Park Fee $0.00 License Tax $0.00 LFM Fee $0.00 License Tax (CFD Fund) $0.00 Bridge Fee $0.00 Traffic Impact Fee $0.00 Other Bridge Fee $0.00 Traffic Impact (CFD Fund) $0.00 BTD #2 Fee $0.00 SidwaIk Fee $0.00 BTD #3 Fee $0.00 PLUMBING TOTAL $181.00 Renewal Fee $0.00 ELECTRICAL TOTAL $60.00 Add'l Renewal Fee $0.00 MECHANICAL TOTAL $65.50 Other Building Fee $0.00 Housing Impact Fee $0.00 Pot. Water Con. Fee $0.00 . Housing lnLieu Fee $0.00 Meter Size -. Master Drainage Fee . $0.00 Add'l Pot. Water Con. Fee $0.00 Sewer Fee $0.00 Red. Water Con. Fee $0.00 Additional Fees $0.00 TOTAL PERMIT FEES $1,980.00 Total Fees: $1,980.00 Total Payments To Date: $717.63 Balance Due: $1,262.37 FINAL A Date: Clearance: NOTICE: Please take NOTICE thatJpproval of your project includes the 'Imposition" of fes, ded?çations, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as lees/exactions." YouLhave 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest im'osition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project. NOR DOES IT APPLY to any PERMIT, APPLICATION CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY PLAN CHECK NO. (23l7 EST. VAL. gn , Plan Ck. Deposit ''iI '7, (i2.3 Validated By C.? Date 'I S —0 _. ) Address (include Bldg/Suite #) Business Name (at this address) Legal Description, - Lot No. Subdivision Name/Number - Unit No. Phase No. Total # of units Assessor's Parcel # Descriptio of Work W-63 /3 £. SQ. FT. 1/of Stories 1/ of Bedrooms 1/ of Bathrooms NeW LSON It tpmappiicant),. l'UQAIL).27 b7 -Lt1Y%bPCAi"1 7U/-UOf 7D7b Name J Address City State/Zip Telephone # Fax # Name Address ... - City State/Zip Telephone # f PROPERTY OWNER Name Address City State/Zip Telephone # ji:CQMPANX1il (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars ($5001). Name Address City State/Zip Telephone # State License # License Class City Business License # Designer Name Address City State/Zip Telephone State License # WORKEOMPENSATJL_ Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Insurance Company Policy No. Expiration Date__________________ (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($1001 OR LESS) CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage Is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), in addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, Interest and attorney's fees. SIGNATURE DATE L77OWNERB6ILDER DECLARATION T._ I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: - - I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an Owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees; provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder willhave the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). '%J,, I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). 0 I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason: I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. 0 YES ONO I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name I address / phone number / contractors license number): I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address /,phone number / type of work): yr ,,/J/ PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE IwIv ifffJ LUrflIVIII Is the the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? 0 YES 0 NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? 0 YES 0 NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? 0 YES 0- NO - - IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. O.:.iJfI ITIflRII CPJrIR I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of theL work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 30970) Civil Code). LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS_______________________________________________________ .iI. I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the Citti of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE. INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST. ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is comm n ed,or a erioA of 180 days (Section 106.4.4 Uniform Building Code). APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE 41\ DATE WHITE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance Inspection List Permit#: CB022379 Type: RESDNTL RAD DONALD-WELSHONSD RES/752 SF REMOD, 2171 SF NEW ADDITION Date Inspection Item Inspector Act Comments 12/20/2004 89 Final Combo PY AP 12/20/2004 89 Final Combo - RI 01/26/2004 89 Final Combo PY CO SEE NOTICE 12/22/2003 21 Underground/Under Floor PY WC 12/22/2003 22 Sewer/Water Service PY AP 12/22/2003 23 Gas/Test/Repairs PY AP 09/08/2003 17 Interior Lath/Drywall PY .AP BATHROOM LATH 09/08/2003 17 Interior Lath/Drywall PY AP BATHROOM LATH 09/03/2003 13 Shear Panels/HD's JM WC 09/03/2003 17 Interior Lath/Drywall JM AP 09/03/2003 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall JM AP 09/02/2003 17 Interior Lath/Drywall JM NR 09/02/2003 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall JM CO TRIM SUBFLOOR VENTS (3) VERIFY ACCESS OPENING SIZE 08/26/2003 16 Insulation PY AP 08/26/2003 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall PY WC 08/21/2003 84 Rough Combo PY AP 08/20/2003 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin PY CO 08/20/2003 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall PY WC 08/20/2003 24 Rough/Topout PY AP 08/20/2003 34 Rough Electric PY AP 08/20/2003 44 Rough/Ducts/Dampers PY AP 08/14/2003 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin PY CA 08/13/2003 84 Rough Combo PY NR SEE NOTICE ATTACHED 07/29/2003 13 Shear Panels/HD's PY WC 07/29/2003 24 Rough/Topout PY NA 07/29/2003 34 Rough Electric PY NA 07/25/2003 13 Shear Panels/HD's PY AP 07/25/2003 84 Rough Combo PY WC 06/10/2003 33 Service Change/Upgrade PY AP SERVICE UPGRADE 06/04/2003 13 Shear Panels/HD's PY CO 06/02/2003 15 Roof/Reroof PY AP 05/29/2003 15 Roof/Reroof PY NA SAME CORREC AS BEFORE 05/23/2003 13 Shear Panels/HD's PY NA 05/23/2003 15 Roof/Reroof PY CO 05/22/2003 83 Roof Sheathing/Ext Shear PY NS 04/14/2003 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin PY WC 03/21/2003 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin PY AP SUBFLOOR 03/04/2003 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PY AP 03/03/2003 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PY AP 03/03/2003 31 Underground/Conduit-Wirin PY PA CONDUIT ONLY 02/27/2003 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PY CA 02/27/2003 31 Underground/Conduit-Wirin PY CA 02/26/2003 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PY NA Wednesday, December 22, 2004 Page 1 of 2 02/19/2003 21 Underground/Under Floor PY AP 02/19/2003 22 Sewer/Water Service PY WC Wednesday, December 22, 2004 Page 2 of 2 City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request. For: 12/20/2004 Permit# CB022379 Title: DONALD-WELSHONSD RES1752 SF Description: REMOD, 2171 SF NEW ADDITION Type: RESDNTL L Sub Type: RAD Job Address: 2121 PLACIDO CT Suite: Lot 0 Location: OWNER BEVERLY DONALD K&WELSHONS KIM Owner: BEVERLY DONALD K&WELSHONS KIM Remarks: Total Time: Inspector Assignment: PY Phone: 7609420112 Inspector: Requested By: KIM Entered By: CHRISTINE CD Description Act Comment 19 Final Structural 29 Final Plumbing 39 Final Electrical 49 Final Mechanical Associated PCR /CVs PCR031 11 ABANDOND COMBINED INTO PCR03-I32; BEAMS @ FAM RM,MSTR BDRM,LAU,FIREPLACE PCR03117 ABANDOND COMBINED INTO PCR03-I32; HIP CHANGE/ CLOSET PCR03132 ISSUED WELSHONS RES-REVISE FIREPLACE; Inspection History Date Description 01/26/2004 89 Final Combo 12/22/2003 21 Underground/Under Floor 12/22/2003 22 Sewer/Water Service 12/22/2003 23 Gas/Test/Repairs 09/08/2003 17 Interior Lath/Drywall 09/08/2003 17 Interior Lath/Drywall 09/03/2003 13 Shear Panels/HD's 09/03/2003 17 Interior Lath/Drywall 09/03/2003 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall 09/02/2003 17 Interior Lath/Drywall 09/02/2003 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall 08/26/2003 16 Insulation 08/26/2003 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall 08/21/2003 84 Rough Combo Act lnsp Comments CO PY SEE NOTICE WC PY AP PY AP PY AP PY BATHROOM LATH AP PY WC JM AP JM AP JM NA JM CO JM TRIM SUBFLOOR VENTS (3) VERIFY ACCESS OPENING SIZE AP PY WC PY AP PY 77 - •.4_._.. FIELD TESTING, REPORT W.O. 3 3"i2.-c - DATE .2-AV ? NAME HOURS 1%. CLIENT TRACT_/"1-' 'LOCATION SUPT. a. CONTRACTOR EQUIPMENT ,cg,ryic ,6c1c -z TEST NO. LOCATION . ELEV. OR DEPTH MOISTURE CONTENT % DRY DENSITY P.C.F. % RELATIVE . COMPACTION TEST TYPE SOIL TYPE r _4' _f_I 421J-,; 41 ,, , , -, ,. ch1-__,CL tr,)fed ,eL(d/ i -vt-i, ..,- Av _________ -, , -;: I e..- t. ICiLe. __ c h._( .. __ ... r'- - F COMMENTS _42f_ GeoSoils, Inc. BY: PAGE / OF / E:/wp/forms/fieldtst.wpd -•• h Structural Inspections SPECIAL INSPECTiON SERVICES 440 Tilling Way, El Cajon, CA 92020 Fax: (619) 749-5693, Cell: (619) 770-9559, Pager: (619) 907-3511 Inspection Report Project Name: tL/4,4ot3 Project Address: 2 1 2-1 Plc. c. u CT - Architect: Engineer: L' i' _; ,• Contractor: H 6,1 LP-S INSPECTION MATERIAL SAMPLING QTV MATERIAL DESCRIPTION INSPECTION CHECKLIST - Structural Steel - H.S. Bolts - H.S. Bolts .. Plans/Specs - Masonry - Prisms Conc. PSI - Clearances - - Concrete Mortar/Grout - Grout PSI - Positions - Fireproofing - Conc. Cylinders - Mortar PSI - . Sizes 7 Other - Fireproof / Steel - Elect./Wire Other Other - Consolidation - Other: - Other: - Fireproof - Torque Ft.Lbs: - Other - Other: - ,*'.Other: i— ,' Otherjc /30 Other: Other: 7 Other "f-cR Other: ,c!4-i-00 o I 7f'8" A-i 443)10A 44 0(4 O -' 64 (D A 1- 3b'1.l I." +'i Ii Ii I—sop Tc Les, 1 LL/1-17 I ; 0 0 , ->p 0-?' ~4'- j-c. ry lb -'sk, (1c+--h- CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: All reported work, unless otherwise noted, complies with approved pIans,pecifications and applicable sections of the building codes. This report covers the locations of the work inspected d-does not constitute opinion or project control. .e ~~ i t I . / 1/ J Inspector: MARIO BATTAGLIA Ceit: 350 I Y / - 03 Signature Date im 4: Time Start: I 1.• )'-' Time Stop... Copies of report submitted to: Page: of Report #: Permit#: ce, 012. 3 i File #: DSA#: Other: i2 X /?L4-dd c4 Structural Inspections "SPECIAL INSPECTION SERVICES"' 440 Tilling Way, El Cajon, CA 92020 Telephone: (619) 7494912, Fax: (619) 749-5693, Cell: (619) 770-9559, Pager: (619) 907-3511 Project Address: Architect:_ Project Name:_k/ts,4'o6vs 7c)a6JK 9- Engineer: Contractor: IA''j*S? - G ',r. Inspection Report , 'OA.) Page: / of / Report #:_ e,?l ____________ Permit#:_C 6 02.2379 File #: DSA #: Other: - INSPECTION MATERIAL SAMPLING QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION INSPECTION CHECKLIST Structural Steel - H.S. Bolts - H.S. Bolts - Plans/Specs - Masonry - Prisms Conc. PSI - Clearances - Concrete - Mortar/Grout Grout PSI - Positions Fireproofing Conc. Cylinders Mortar PSI - Sizes Othep1 Fireproof 7teel /g 7/s" t Laps ElectfWire - - Other ' Other: Consolidation Other: Other: Fireproof Torque Ft.Lbs: Other: Other: her .r 7rnr /0 4" e Other: Other: Otherj.7j r'? ;PV' Other: /r r 5;a / (2::) ?'B' 7 4/P I#7, "~'7J 01, 0 CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: All reported work, unless otherwise noted, complies with approved plans, specifications and opinion or applicable sections of the building codes. This report covers the locations of the wo 7.;;;T project control. Inspector: MARIO BATTAGLIA Cert: 350 titute Date Structural Inspections 'A SPECIAL INSPECTiON COMPANY' 440 Tilling Way, El Cajon, CA 92020 Telephone: (619) 7494912, Fax: (619) 749-5693, Cell: (619) 770-9559, Pager (619) 907-3511 Inspection Report Project Name: WELSHONS ADDITION Project Address:2121PLACIIDO COURT ------D Architect: JOHN S. BEERY Engineer:LAMDA ENGINEERING Contractor:GHG CONSTRUCTION Page: _1 of 1 Report #: 01 Permit #: CB022379 File #: N/A DSA#:N/A Other N/A iNspect OI4 .4 MA *SA 4Mi YJe o Structural Steel J H.S. Bolts 0 H.S. Bolts Plans/Specs o Masonry 0 Prisms 0 Conc. PSI 0 Clearances o Concrete Mortar/Grout 0 Grout PSI 0 Positions o Fireproofing 0 Conc. Cylinders 0 Mortar PSI Sizes o Other 0 Fireproof Steel 50, 7/8" All Thread 0 Laps Other EPDXY 0 Other: 0 Elect/Wire 0 Consolidation o Other 0 Other: 0 Fireproof 0 Torque Ft.Lbs: o Other 0 Other: Other SIMPSON SET Other. ICBO 5279 0 Other fl Other: Other: 10, 15", 18" EMBED Other: PERFORMED CONTINUOUS SPECIAL INSPECTION ON THE INSTALLATION OF THE FOLLOWING EPDXY BOLTS: 1)7/8" HOLDOWN, 5/8" ANCHORS AT THE SIMPSON STRONG WALLS AT THE GARAGE. 2) HOLDOWN BOLTS AT THE STRONG WALL 3 OF THE DINING ROOM. 3)5/8" HD2A HOLDOWN AT THE SHEAR PANELS OF THE GARAGE. 4) HD6A, HD8A HOLDOWN BOLTS AT THE DINING ROOM AND KITCHEN AREAS. VERIFIED BOLT TYPES, SIZES, HOLE SIZES, DEPTH, LOCATION, CLEANLINESS AND EPDXY TYPE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: All reported work, unless otherwise noted, complies with approved plans, specifications and applicable sections of the building codes. This E4~ t covers the IqcatjoØ's lof the work inspected and does not constitute opinion or project control. 4. Inspector MARIO BATAGLIA Cert: City of SD #350 7'" 'lvi) 5/8/03 Siankture Date Insp. Date: Day 1: 56M Day 2: Day 3: Day 4: Day 5: Time Start: 800 Time Stop: 10:00 Copies of report submitted to I EsGil Corporation In !Partnersliip uiit/i government for f8ui fling Safety DATE: November 13, 2002 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 02-2379 SET: III PROJECT ADDRESS: 2121 Placido Court O AP CANT JURIS O PLAN REVIEWER O FILE PROJECT NAME: SFD Add.! Remodel for Welsons/Beverly residence E The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. LI The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. LI The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. Eli The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS: The designer shall complete the Special Inspection Notice. By: Sergio Azuela Enclosures: Esgil Corporation E GA D MB L EJ D PC 11/5 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576 13 EsGil Corporation In Partnership with government for Bui(1ing Safety DATE: October 14, 2002 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 02-2379 PROJECT ADDRESS: 2121 Placido Court SET: II ICANT JURI LAN REVIEWER 0 FILE PROJECT NAME: SDF Add./Remodel for Welsons/Beverly residence The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. LII The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant• contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: John Beery P.O. Box 130684, Carlsbad, CA 92013-0684 L Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Ej Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: John Beery (L_ I Telephone #: (760) 438-2963 Date contacted:iO(I()0(by: ) Fax #: (same) Mail -"felephonec.- Fax In Person Eli REMARKS: By: Sergio Azuela Enclosures: Esgil Corporation 0 GA 0 MB 0 EJ El Pc 10/7 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad 02-2379 II October 14, 2002 RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 2121 Placido Court DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 10/7 REVIEWED BY: Sergio Azuela FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): PLAN CHECK NO.: 02-2379 SET: II DATE RECHECK COMPLETED: October 14, 2002 This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews. The original correction number has been given for your reference. In case you did not keep a copy of the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding corrections. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? DYes DNo Carlsbad 02-2379 II October 14, 2002 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 6. Handrails (Section 1003.3.3.6): The handgrip portion of all handrails shall be not less than 1-1/4 inches nor more than 2 inches in cross-sectional dimension. Handrails projecting from walls shall have at least 1-1/2 inches between the wall and the handrail. Ends of handrails shall be returned or shall have rounded terminations or bends. No response was provided for this correction. Original correction is still applicable. 7. Show garage framing sections, size of header over garage opening, lateral cross bracing at plate line, method bracing garage front and holddowns if required. Chapter 16. NOTE: Maximum shear panel height-to-width ratio is 3½4o-I for plywood. Table 23-11-G. In Seismic Zone 4, this 3114-to-1 ratio is only permitted in one-story garages with a wall height not exceeding 10 feet. No response was provided for this correction. Original correction is still applicable. 8. Show minimum underfloor ventilation equal to 1 sq. ft. for each 150 sq. ft. of underfloor area. Openings shall be as close to corners as practical and shall provide cross ventilation on at least two approximately opposite sides. Section 2306.7. Clearly show on plans the required access to the new undefloor space. 9. Show the type and size (BTU's) of all heating and cooling appliances or systems. FAU #2 is still missing. Original correction is still applicable. Er Carlsbad 02-2379 II October 14, 2002 10. Please provide details specifications and cross-reference from details to plans for the Glass Block construction. No response was provided for this correction. Original Correction is still applicable. 11. The designer shall complete the attached Special Inspection Notice. The Building Department will resolve this correction. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Sergio Azuela at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. EsGil Corporation 1n Partnership with government for Wui(&ng Safety DATE: August 28, 2002 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 02-2379 PROJECT ADDRESS: 2121 Placido Court SET:I L3,APPKANT JURIS U PLAN REVIEWER U FILE PROJECT NAME: SFD Add./Remodel for Welsons/Beverly residence LI The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. LI The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. LI The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. VN The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: John Beery P.O. Box 130684, Carlsbad, CA 92013-0684 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Z Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: John Beery Date contacted: '( 12- (by:- ) Mail -fIephone" Fax,,---'In Person LI REMARKS: Telephone #: (760) 438-2963 Fax #: ( s-) By: Sergio Azuela Enclosures: Esgil Corporation DGA [:1 MB DEJ DPC 8/19 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad 02-2379 August 28, 2002 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES PLAN CHECK NO.: 02-2379 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 2121 Placido Court FLOOR AREA: Dwelling Addition 2,193 SF STORIES: 2 Dwelling Remodel 1,833 SF Existing Garage 535 SF HEIGHT: REMARKS: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: 8/15/02 ESGIL CORPORATION: 8/19 DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW PLAN REVIEWER: Sergio Azuela COMPLETED: August 28, 2002 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Present California law mandates that residential construction comply with the 1998 edition of the California Building Code (Title 24), which adopts the following model codes: 1997 UBC, 1997 UPC, 1997 UMC and 1996 NEC (all effective 7/1/99). The above regulations apply to residential construction, regardless of the code editions adopted by ordinance. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. Carlsbad 02-2379 August 28, 2002 . PLANS 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 2. Provide a statement on the Title Sheet of the plans stating that this project shall comply with the 1998 edition of the California Building Code (Title 24), which adopts the 1997 UBC, UMC and UPC and the 1996 NEC. 3. On the cover sheet of the plans, specify any items requiring special inspection, in a format similar to that shown below. Section 106.3.2. . REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS In addition to the regular inspections, the following checked items will also require Special Inspection in accordance with Sec. 1701 of the Uniform Building Code. ITEM REQUIRED? REMARKS SOILS COMPLIANCE PRIOR TO YES SOILS REPORT FOUNDATION INSPECTION EPDXY ANCHORS YES S-PLANS . GENERAL RESIDENTIAL REQUIREMENTS 4. Glazing in the following locations should be of safety glazing material in accordance with Section 2406.4 (see exceptions): a) Fixed or operable panels adjacent to a door where the nearest exposed edge of the glazing is within a 24-inch arc of either vertical edge of the door in a closed position and where the bottom exposed edge of the glazing is less than 60 inches above the walking surface. 9 Window KK at Bedroom 2. Carlsbad 02-2379 August 28, 2002 EXITS, STAIRWAYS, AND RAILINGS 5. Guardrails (Section 509.1): a) Shall be detailed showing adequacy of connections to resist the horizontal force prescribed in Table 16-B. 6. Handrails (Section 1003.3.3.6): The handgrip portion of all handrails shall be not less than 1-1/4 inches nor more than 2 inches in cross-sectional dimension. Handrails projecting from walls shall have at least 1-1/2 inches between the wall and the handrail. Ends of handrails shall be returned or shall have rounded terminations or bends. 7. Provide details of winding stairway complying with Section 1003.3.3.8.2: a) Maximum rise is 8 inches. . ROOFING 8. Balconies and decks exposed to the weather and sealed underneath shall be sloped a minimum of 1/4 inch per foot for drainage. Section 1402.3. 9. Show roof drains and overflows. Sections 1506.2 and 1506.3. GARAGE AND CARPORTS 10. Show garage framing sections, size of header over garage opening, lateral cross bracing at plate line, method bracing garage front and holddowns if required. Chapter 16. NOTE: Maximum shear panel height-to-width ratio is 3Y2 -to-1 for plywood. Table 23-11-G. In Seismic Zone 4, this 31/2-to-I ratio is only permitted in -story garages with a wall height not exceeding 10 feet. . FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS 11. The foundation plan does not comply with the soils report recommendations for this project. Please review the report and modify design, notes and details as required to show compliance: Foundations to be 24" depth instead of 18" (see details 3, 4 and 5 of sheet SDI. Isolated pad footings should be connected by a grade beam in at least one direction. Slab on grade shall be 5" thick minimum, also specify the required reinforcement and underlayment. 12. Investigate the potential for seismically induced soil liquefaction and soil instability in Seismic Zones 3 and 4. This does not apply to detached, single- story dwellings. Section 1804.5 Carlsbad 02-2379 August 28, 2002 13. Note on the plan the soils classification, whether or not the soil is expansive and note the allowable bearing value. Section 106.3.3. 14. The soils engineer recommended that he/she review the foundation excavations. Note on the foundation plan that "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building Department foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the building official in writing that: The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report, The utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and The foundation excavations, the soils expansive characteristics and bearing capacity conform to the soils report." 15. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soils report are properly incorporated into the construction documents (when required by the soil report). 16. Show distance from foundation to edge of cut or fill slopes ("distance-to- daylight") and show slope and heights of cuts and fills. Chapter 18. 17. Note on plans that surface water will drain away from building and show drainage pattern. Section 1804.7. 18. Show minimum underfloor access of 18" x 24". Section 2306.3. 19. Show minimum underfloor ventilation equal to 1 sq. ft. for each 150 sq. ft. of underfloor area. Openings shall be as close to corners as practical and shall provide cross ventilation on at least two approximately opposite sides. Section 2306.7. FRAMING 20. Specify truss identification numbers on the plans. 21. Per UBC Section 2321.4, provide the following note on the plans if trusses are used: '.'Each truss shall be legibly branded, marked or otherwise have permanently affixed thereto the following information located within 2 feet of the center of the span on the face of the bottom chord: Identity of the company manufacturing the truss. The design load. The spacing of the trusses." . MECHANICAL (UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE) 22. Show the type and size (BTU's) of all heating and cooling appliances or systems. 23. Show permanent electrical outlet and lighting fixture controlled by a switch for furnace located in attic or underfloor space. Sections 306.3 and 306.4, UMC. Carlsbad 02-2379 August 28, 2002 Note that passageway to the mechanical equipment in the attic shall be unobstructed, not less than 30" high and 30" wide and have continuous solid flooring not less than 24 inches wide, not more than 20 feet in length through the attic. Section 307.3.2, UMC. . PLUMBING (UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE) In Seismic Zones 3 and 4, show that water heater is adequately braced to resist seismic forces. Provide two straps (one strap at top 1/3 of the tank and one strap at bottom 1/3 of the tank). UPC, Section 510.5 In the garage, provide an adequate barrier to protect water heater from vehicle damage. An 18" platform for the water heater does not satisfy this requirement. UPC, Section 510.3. . MISCELLANEOUS Please provide details specifications and cross-reference from details to plans for the Glass Block construction. Please provide a handrail for the steps on the rear side at the New Porch. Please provide the size of the Foundation under the exterior winding stairs. CARLSBAD SPECIAL CODE REQUIREMENTS The designer shall complete the attached Special Inspection Notice To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: Yes C3 No The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Sergio Azuela at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. Carlsbad 02-2379 August 28, 2002 City of- Carlsbad I:T11r.hI1..ri.ir14ilr -jaI BUILDING DEPARTMENT NOTICE OF REQUIREMENT FOR SPECIAL INSPECTION Do Not Remove From Plans Plan Check No. 02-2379 Job Address or Legal Description 2121 Placido Court Owner. 14w¼ Ve4OWtv / Address 'P4 ZA '4 y4 You are hereby notified that in aldition to the inspection of construction provided by the Building Department, an approved Registered Special Inspector is required to provide continuous inspection during the performance of the phases of construction indicated on the reverse side of this sheet. The Registered Special Inspector shall be approved by the City of Carlsbad Building Department prior to the issuance of the building permit. Special Inspectorshaving a current certification from the City of San Diego, Los Angeles, or ICBO are approved as Special Inspectors for the type of construction for which they are certified. The inspections by a Special Inspector do not change the requirements for inspections by personnel of the City of Carlsbad building department. The inspections by a Special Inspector are in addition to the inspections normally required by the County Building Code. The Special Inspector is not authorized to inspect and approve any work other than that for which he/she is specifically assigned to inspect. The Special Inspector is not authorized to accept alternate materials, structural changes, or any requests for plan changes. The Special Inspector is required to submit written reports'to the City of Carlsbad building department of all work that he/she inspected and approved. The final inspection approval will not be given until all Special Inspection reports have been received and approved by the City of Carlsbad building department. Please submit the names of the inspectors who will perform the special inspections on each of the items indicated on the reverse side of this sheet. (over) Carlsbad 02-2379 August 28, 2002 SPECIAL INSPECTION PROGRAM ADDRESS OR LEGAL DESCRIPTION: i ZI rL4e.-4 D1.t.v4 PLAN. CHECK NUMBER: O i,'1 OWNERS NAME: I, as the owner, or agent of the owner (contractors may not employ the special inspector), certify-that I, or the architect/engineer of record, will be responsible for employing the special inspector(s) as required by Uniform Building Code (UBC) Section 1701.1 .for the construction project located at the site listed above. UBC Section 106.3.5. 1, as the engineer/architect of record, certify that I have prepared the following special inspection program as required by UBC Section 106.3.5 for the construction project located at the site listed above. Enain..rslArchhl.c,s Seal & Slgnalurs Hare o Signed 1. List of work requiring special inspection: Soils Compliance Prior to Foundation Inspection Field Welding Structural Concrete Over 2500 PSI High Strength Bolting Prestressed Concrete Expansion/Epoxy Anchors Structural Masonry . El Sprayed-On Fireproofing Designer Specified Other 2. Name(s) of individual(s) or firm(s) responsible for the special inspections listed above: p6e.'+ Uispm&n - GeooiLs 1 1v.. 1to 431 3155 C ',Pm&eA.s ¶e'1..i& • • q 6155 3. Duties of the special inspectors for the work listed above: E 1. V'5- Special lnspectors shall check in with the City and present their credentials for approval prior to beginning work on the job site. Carlsbad 02-2379 August 28, .2002 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 02-2379 PREPARED BY: Sergio.Azuela DATE: August 28, 2002 BUILDING ADDRESS: 2121 Piacido Court SFD Add./Rem. Welsons/Beverly Residence BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R-3 & U-i TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V-N BUILDING PORTION AREA (Sq. Ft.) Valuation Multiplier Reg. Mod. VALUE ($) Dwelling Add. 2193 280,869 Dwelling Rem. 1833 Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE 280,869 Jurisdiction Code 1cb IBY Ordinance 1994 UBC Building Permit Fee 1994 UBC Plan Check Fee V Type of Review: EI Complete Review Structural Only El Q Other Repetitive Fee Repeats o Hourly I Hour * Esgil Plan Review Fee I $1,104.041 I $717.631 I $618.261 Comments: Sheet I of 1 macvalue.doc Citv .of Carlsbad I IT'I 11 I'i'IT - - iii ii a VIVA dl iL.j BUILDING PLANC HECK CHECKLIST PLANCHECKNO.: CB 02-2,3-7.9 41(e V9Z O(.o EST. VALUE: CT ic:ôl ENGINEERING DEPARTM APPROVAL 7/1"DENIAL The item you have submitted for review has been Please s è th. attached report of decier;ces approved. The approval is based on plans, marked w th Make necessary corrections to plans information and/or specifications provided in your or specific ions for compliance with applicable submittal; therefore any changes to these items after codes and standaçds. Submit corrected plans and/or this date, including field modifications, must be specifications)ttis office for review. reviewed by this office to insure continued - conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to build. 1A Right-of-Way permit is required prior to construction of the following improvements: By: Date: By: Date: AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE BUILDING PERMIT: "S-/2,9 )0'2, DATE: BUILDING ADDRESS: PROJECT DESCRIPTIC ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: By: ATTACHMENTS El Dedication Application o Dedication Checklist O Improvement Application o Improvement Checklist 0 Future Improvement Agreement Grading Permit Application Grading Submittal Checklist Date: ENGINEERING DEPT. CONTACT PERSON Name: KATHLEEN M. FARMER City of Carlsbad Address: 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008 Phone: (760) 602-2741 CFD INFORMATION Parcel Map No: Lots: O Right-of-Way Permit Application Recordation: O Right-of-Way Permit Submittal Checklist Carlsbad Tract: and Information Sheet O Sewer Fee Information Sheet A-4 CA 9200-731 4 • (760) 602-2720 • FAX (760) 602R85€2 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST. 1ST 2N0 3RD checklist must be submitted in person. Applications by mail or fax are not accepted. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of building permit. Improvement Plans signed by: . Date: El El El 6b. Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title report or current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $310 so we may prepare the necessary Future Improvement Agreement. This agreement must be signed, *'notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building permit. Future public improvements required as follows: El El 0 6c. Enclosed please find your Future Improvement Agreement. Please return • agreement signed and notarized to the Engineering Department. Future Improvement Agreement completed by: Date: El El 0 6d. No Public Improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or defective improvements found adjacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction of the City Inspector prior to occupancy. . GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS c The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section 11.06.030 of the Municipal Code. El 7a. Inadequate information available on Site Plan to majca determination -on grading / requirements. Include accurate grading El U U 7b. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Ciyil Engineer must be submitted together with the completed application form attached. NOTE: The Grading Permit must be issued and rough grading approval obtained prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Grading Inspector sign off by: Date: El El U 7c. Graded Pad Certification required. (Note: Pad certification may be required even if a grading permit is not required.) . . . N' AWOROUX)CSICHMSTMdIding Pland%eck cklst Form (GENERIC 7.14-0000c - 4 Rev. 711410.0 BUILDING PLANCHECK. CHECKLIST 2 ND 3RD/ 0 21' 7d .No Grading Permit required. I MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS 0 0 0 8. A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-Way and/or private work adjacent to the public Right-of-Way. Types of work include, but are not limited to: street improvements, tree trimming, driveway 'construction, tying into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities. Right-of-Way permit required for: 0 0 0 9. INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT If your facility is located in the City of Carlsbad sewer service area, you need to contact the Carlsbad Municipal Water District, located at 5950 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008. District personnel can provide forms and assistance, and will check to see if your business enterprise is on the EWA Exempt List You may telephone (760) 438-2722, extension 7153, for assistance. lndustril Waste permit accepted by:• Date: . .._ . ... .... O 0 0 10. NPDES PERMIT Complies with the City's requirements •of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant shall provide best management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever occurs first. 0 0 0 11. 0 Required fees are attached 0 No fees required WATER METER REVIEW 0 0 0 12a. Domestic (potable) Use Ensure that the meter proposed by the owner/developer is not oversized. Oversized meters are inaccurate during low-flow conditions. If it is oversized, for the life of the meter, the City will not accurately bill the owner for the water used. All single family dwelling units received "standard" I" service with 5/8" service. H:W0RDDOCSlCH$T8,Idkig Planthedi CIII Fotni (Genedc).doc 5 . Rev. 71*4100 PLANNING DEPARTMENT BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST Plan Check No. CB O -2-7g Address 2II 9&c.mo cr Planner Van Lynch Phone (760) 602-4613 APN: 2(6—(qz--6 ' Type of Project & Use: /6 A1'br77c?sJ Net Project Density: VIA DU/AC /A Zoning: Ac-(AA Gen eral Plan:i2'i Facilities Management Zone: 6 4 _ CFD Date of participation:- Remaining net dev acres: _— Circ e >. >. >. (For non-residential development: Type of land used created by this permit:_________________________________________________ C) C U C U C t t I 1171 Legend: CompleteOEI Incomplete Needs . lz~s.lItem tem your action - Ii[ Li LI Environmental Review Required: YES NO K TYPE DATE OF COMPLETION: Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: fl Discretionary Action Required: YES NO TYPE APPROVAL/RESO. NO. DATE PROJECT NO. OTHER RELATED CASES: Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval:____________________________________________________ 1L1 Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance Project site located in Coastal Zone? YES NOX CA Coastal Commission Authority? YES NO____ If California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact them at - 7575 Metropolitan Drive; Suite 103, San Diego CA 92108-4402; (619) 767-2370 Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt): Coastal Permit Determination Form already completed? YES NO____ If NO, complete Coastal Permit Determination Form now. Coastal Permit Determination Log #: Follow-Up Actions: Stamp Building Plans as "Exempt" or "Coastal Permit Required" (at minimum Floor Plans). Complete Coastal Permit Determination Log as needed. H:\ADMINCOUNTER\BIdgPInchkRevChkIst .1. E [1 IncIusionary Housing Fee required: YES NO .(Effective date of Inclusionary Housing Ordinance May 21, 1993.) Data Entry Completed? YES NO (AIPIDs, Activity Maintenance, enter CB#, toolbar, Screens, Housing Fees, Construct Housing YIN, Enter Fee, UPDATE!) Site Plan: Provide a fully dimensional site plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing Street improvements, right-of-way width, dimensional _sçbaqks and existing topographical lines (including all .side and rear yard slopes). Provide legal description of property and assessor's parcel nurn Zoning: 1. Setbacks: Front: Required zd Shown ao' Interior Side: Required 6,2-Cio%1.g-*o!kA Shown 7.0 Street Side: Required Shown - Rear: Required lZ.'( Shown—FO-''lz..' ó' Top of slope: Required XJ4. Shown 1tfA. T4 LI LI 2. Accessory structure setbacks: Front: Required Shown Interior Side: Required , / / Shown Street Side: Required V I A ,Shown Rear: Required / 1't Shown Structure separation: Required Shown 3. Lot Coverage: Required - (0f0 Shown I (r (f 06 LI 4. Height: Required Shown Z-Y' 5. Parking: Spaces Required 2- Shown 2_ (breakdown by uses for commercial and industrial projects required) Residential Guest Spaces Required ,ht)/A_ Shown Additional Comments Pcr Afoi1,b 'aøPoJ.b c,&A,* s&7Ak- o cvMvA' psi foufa.ty PftoP&-?y 1-1iv8 kP- VAI M- /4/u b94J. o$ 0P Lc7 £4 b?# I I /l4(Li 'AB sO— j?i/Z '/R.b &rtAt. t cDu)4J OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER t/1.tjr,LlCL_- DATE H:ADMlNCOUNTER\B!dgPlnchkRevChklst Geotechnical • Geologic Environmental 5741 Palmer Way • Carlsbad, California 92008 • (760)438-3155 • FAX (760) 931-0915 September 23, 2002 W.O. 3310-A2-SC Ms. Kim Weishon do John S. Beery ArChitect, Inc. A.I.A. P.O. Box 130684 Carlsbad, California 92013-0684 Attention: Ms. Joyce Riggen Subject: Seismically Induced Soil Instability and Liquefaction Potential, 2121 Placido Court, Carlsbad, San Diego County, California Reference: "Pre!iminary Geotechnical. Evaluation, 2121 Placido Court, 'Carlsbad, San Diego County, California," W.O. 3310-A2-SC, dated July 29, 2002, by GeoSoils, Inc. . . Dear Ms. Riggen: In accordance with a request from John Beery Architect, AlA, GeoSoils, Inc. (GSI), has reviewed site conditions with respect to liquefaction potential, and other seismically induced hazards onsite. The following list includes other seismic related hazards that have been considered during. our evaluation of the site. The hazards listed are considered negligible and/or completely mitigated as a result of site location, soil characteristics and typical Site development procedures: Liquefaction Dynamic Settlement • Surface Fault Rupture Ground Lurching or Shallow Ground Rupture Tsunami It is important to keep in perspective that in the event of a maximum probable or credible earthquake occurring on any of the nearby major faults, strong ground shaking would occur in the subject site's general area. Potential damage to. any structure(s) would likely be greatest from the vibrations and impelling farce caused by the inertia of a structure's mass, than from those induced by the hazards considered above. This potential would be no greater than that br other existing structures and improvements in the immediate vicinity. The conclusions and recommendations presented herein are professional opinions. These opinions have been derived in accordance with current standards of practice and no warranty is expressed or implied. Standards of practiceare subject to change with time. GSI assumes no responsibility for work, testing or recommendations performed or provided by others. The opportunity to be of service iS greatly appreciated. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call our office. Respectfully submitted, Reviewed by: A Is Robert G Cris a avid W. -Sk I cc NM 7857 4,:j I RGc/DWS/JPF/jh JIVI Distribution: (4) Addressee Ms. Kim Weishon W.O. 3310-A2-SC 2121 Placido Court, Carlsbad September 23, 2002 Fi1e:e:\wp7't3300\3310a2.s1s Page 2 GeoSoils, Inc. GeotchnicaI e Geologic Environmental 5741 Palmer Way, Carlsbad, California 92008 • (760) 43831 55 • FAX (760) 931-0915 September 16, 2002 W.O. 331 O-A2-SC MS. KirnWelshon do John S. Beery Architect, Inc. A.I.A. P.O. Box 130684 Carlsbad, California 92013-0684 Attention: M's. Joyce Riggen Subject: Foundation Plan Review, 2121 Placido Court, Carlsbad, San Diego County, California Reference: 1. uprelimina,.y Geotechnical Evaluation; 2121 Plàcido Court, Carlsbad, San Diego County, California," W.O. 3310-A2-SC, dated July 29, 2002, by GeoSoils, Inc. 2. "Welshons Addition, 2121 Placido Court, Carlsbad , Ca. 92009, Foundation Plan," SheétsSi, SD1 and SN-11, Job No. 0502-4110, dated July 1, 2002, revised September 4,2002, by Lamda Engineering Consultants. Dear Ms. Riggen: In accordance with a request from John Beery Architect, AlA, GeoSoils, Inc. (GSI), has performed a review of the referenced foundation plans, notes and details prepared by Lambda Engineering Company, and the referenced report prepared by thiS office for the subject project. Based on the data to date, the plans reviewed appear to be in general conformance with the recommendations provided by this Office and presented in GSl's referenced report The conclusions and 'recommendations presented herein are professional opinions. These • opinions have been derived in accordance with' current standards of practice and no warranty is expressed or implied. ,Standards of practice are subject to change with time. GSI assumes no responsibility for work, testing or recommendations performed or provided by others. The opportunity to be of service is greatly appreciated. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call our office. Respectfully submitted, I DD (1011 G6cSolls, Inc. ' o'•\ Robert G. Cri Engineering Qr- CA RGC/DWS/JPF/jh. Distribution: (4) Addressee Reviewed by 4L David W. SkE Civil Enginee Ms. Kim Weishon W.O. 331 O-A2-SC 2121 Placido Court, Carlsbad September 16, 2002 FiIe:e:\wpl\3300\3310a2.fpr Page 2 GeoSoils, Inc. PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION 2121 PLACIDO COURT CARLSBAD, SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA FOR MS. KIM WELSHON C/O JOHN S. BEERY ARCHITECT, INC. A.I.A. P.O. BOX 130684 CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92013-0684 W.O. 3310-A2-SC JULY 299 2002 Geotechnical • Geologic. Environmental 5741 Palmer Way • Carlsbad, California 92008 • (760) 438-3155 • FAX (760) 931-0915 July 29, 2002 W.O. 3310-A2-SC Ms. Kim Welshon do John S. Beery Architect, Inc. A.I.A. P.O. Box 130684 Carlsbad, California 92013-0684 Subject: Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation, 2121 Placido Court, Carlsbad, San Diego County, California' Dear Ms. Welshon: In accordance with your request, GeoSoils, Inc. (GSI) is pleased to present the results of our preliminary geotechnical evaluation on the subject site. The purpose of our investigation was to evaluate the geologic and geotechnical conditions of. the site, relative to the proposed additions, and present recommendations for foundation design and construction based on our findings. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Based on our field exploration, geologic and geotechnical engineering analysis, the proposed development appears. feasible from a geotechnical and geologic viewpoint, provided that the recommendations presented herein are properly incorporated into the design and construction of the project. The most significant elements of our study are summarized below: The subject site is underlain by artificial fill which in turn is underlain by native formational sediments. Based on conversations with Ms. Welshon, initial grading of the site was performed at least 25 years ago. A final compaction report of rough grading for the site could not be supplied nor acquired. The existing foundation was observed to be supported by existing artificial fill. Based on our laboratory testing, it appears that the existing fill maybe suitable for support of settlement-sensitive structures, provided it is treated in accordance with the recommendations provided herein. Additional evaluation of existing fill should be performed during site re-grading for the new additions. Due to the relative age and lack of documentation for the existing artificial fill, as well as changes in the standards of practice since that time, it is possible that variations in the uniformity and suitability of the existing fill for its intended use may exist. Although GSI did not encounter such zones, the potential for fill settlement and associated distress to existing and proposed improvements cannot be entirely precluded. GSI is not stating that such a condition will occur, but merely that this potential exists. This should be considered during project design and construction. A structural engineer should be consulted for evaluation of the existing foundations and their suitability for support of the proposed improvements. Groundwater was not encountered onsite and is generally not anticipated to affect site development, providing that the recommendations contained in this report are incorporated into final design and construction, and that prudent surface and subsurface drainage practices are incorporated into the construction plans. Perched groundwater conditions along zones of contrasting permeabilities should not be precluded from occurring in the future due to site irrigation, poor drainage conditions, or damaged utilities. Should perched groundwater conditions develop, this office could assess the affected area(s) and provide the appropriate recommendations to mitigate the observed groundwater conditions. Our laboratory test results indicate that soils onsite are generally very low in expansion potential (expansion index range 0-20), per the 1997 UBC. Sulfate testing indicates that site soils have a negligible exposure to concrete per Table 19- A-4 of the 1997 UBC (sample = 0.031 percent by weight). Corrosion testing (ph, resistivity) indicates that the soils are slightly acidic (pH = 6.5), but corrosive to ferrous metals (saturated resistivity = 1,000 ohms-cm). Alternative methods and. additional comments should be obtained by a qualified corrosion engineer. Conventional foundation systems utilizing a slab-on-grade may likely be used onsite. The potential for deep foundations and structural slabs or post-tension foundations may not be precluded, however, based on additional evaluation during site re-grading. Based on our review, the site is expected to have a low risk to be affected by seismic hazards. The seismicity acceleration values provided herein should be considered during the design of the proposed development. The geotechnical design parameters provided herein should be considered during project planning design and construction by the project structural engineer and/or architects. Ms. Kim Welson . W.O. 331 O-A2-SC FiIe:e:wp7\3300\3310a2.pge Page Two GeoSoils, Inc. The opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Respectfully submitted, GeoSoils, Inc. G. ( 44 E) Robert G. Crisman Engineering Geologist 2 aff Geologist RB/RGCIJPF/DWS/jh Distribution: (4) Addressee Ms. Kim Weison W.O. 331 O-A2-SC F11e:e:\wp7\3300331Oa2.pge Page Three GeoSoils, Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS SCOPE OF SERVICES . 1 SITE DESCRIPTION AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ............................1 PREVIOUS WORK ........................................................1 FIELD STUDIES ...........................................................3 REGIONAL GEOLOGY ...................................................3 EARTH MATERIALS .......................................................3 Artificial Fill (Map Symbol - At) ..........................................3 Santiago Formation (Not Mapped) ....................................4 FAULTING AND REGIONAL SEISMICITY .......................................4 Faulting.............................................................4 Seismicity........................................................6 Seismic Shaking Parameters ..........................................6 GROUNDWATER ........................................................7 LABORATORY TESTING ................................................... Laboratory Standard ...............................................7 Expansion Potential ..................................................8 Shear Testing ................................... . ..................... 8 Consolidation Testing ...............................................8 Corrosion/Sulfate Testing ..............................................9 EXISTING FILL EVALUATION ..............................................9 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS ..........................................9 General..........................................................9 EARTHWORK CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATIONS .........................10 General.........................................................10 Site Preparation ...................................................10 Removals (Unsuitable Surficial Materials) ..............................10 Fill Placement ....................................................11 RECOMMENDATIONS - FOUNDATIONS .....................................11 Existing Foundations ..............................................11 New Foundation Design .............................................11 New Foundation Construction .........................................12 GeoSoils, Inc. ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS/DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA ................13 Tile Flooring ......................................................13 Gutters and Downspouts ...........................................13 Exterior Slabs and Walkways .........................................14 Landscape Maintenance and Planting ...................................14 Drainage............................................................15 Footing Trench Excavation ...........................................16 Trench Backfill ..................................................•. 16 FOOTING SETBACKS ................................. ......................16 PLAN REVIEW ..........................................................17 INVESTIGATION LIMITATIONS .............................................17 FIGURES: Figure 1'- Site Location Map ..........................................2 Figure 2- California Fault Map .........................................5 ATTACHMENTS: Plate 1 - Geotechnical Map -2121 Placido Court ................Rear of Text Appendix A - References ...................................Rear of Text Appendix B - Boring Logs and Test Pits ........................Rear of Text Appendix C -, Laboratory Data .................................Rear of Text Ms. Kim Weishon Table of Contents FiIe:e:\wp7\3300\3310a2.pge . . Page ii GeoSoils, Inc. PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION 2121 PLACIDO COURT CARLSBAD, SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SCOPE OF SERVICES The scope of our services has included the following: Review of readily available soils and geologic data. (Appendix A), including the previous geologic report for the site. Subsurface exploration consisting of the excavation of two (2) exploratory limited access hollow stem borings and two (2) hand auger borings in the areas of proposed improvements, for geotechnical logging and sampling (Appendix B). Laboratory testing of representative soil samples collected during our Subsurface exploration program (Appendix C). Appropriate engineering arid geologic analysis of data collected and preparation of this report (Appendix D). SITE DESCRIPTION AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The subject site is located on the southwest side of Placido Court (cul-de-sac) in the City of Carlsbad, San Diego County, California (see Site Location Map, Figure 1). An existing single family residence is located on a graded pad constructed within the lot. According to grading plans for Carlsbad Tract 75-7 (Green Valley Knolls) supplied by the Client, the subject site is approximately ±144 feet above Mean Sea Level (MSL. - It is our understanding that the proposed construction will consist of a combination of one and two-story additions. It is anticipated that the proposed structures will be of wood-frame construction, and would partially utilize the existing footings for support. Building loads are assumed to be typical for this type of relatively light construction. PREVIOUS WORK Based on conversations with Ms. Welshon during our field exploration, the subject site is constructed of engineered fill dating to approximately 25 years in age. A final compaction report of this phase of earthwork could not be supplied by Ms. Welshon nor be acquired• through research. GeoSoils, Inc. J-fllopoQu.da Copyright c 1999 Debwme Yarmouth, ME 049% • -_-• LAGOON 4_ st1 rA -' ,-•.- e$agc ft stac& SITE - a: Base Map: Encinitas Quadrangle, California--San Diego Co., 7.5 minute Series (Topographic), 1968 (photo revised 1975), by USGS, 1":2000 WY COSTA /T 0T I LEVANTE ST ".9 4'. () C,çN1C0 TER .. + eSITFl 141 v\. '• - )EL 1N BOCA - , -' 1N. RE CTg k, 4z,:. LEVAP4TE GAIOTA IL Ax t C4 NO TORQi'IA A ( Base Map: The Thomas Guide San Diego County 2002 Edition, by Thomas Bros. Maps, page 1147, 1':1,066' R.produced with permission wanted by Thomas Bros. Maps. This map is copyrighted by Thomas Bros. Maps. It Is unlawful to copy or reproduce all or any part thereof, whether for personal use or resale, without permission. All right, reserved. 4 N W.O. GeoSoils, InC. 3310-A2-SC SITE LOCATION MAP Figure 1 FIELD STUDIES Field studies conducted by GSI consisted of two (2) exploratory limited access hollow stem borings and two (2) exploratory hand auger borings, for evaluation of near-surface soil and geologic conditions. Borings were excavated adjacent to the existing residence in the area of proposed improvements. Borings were logged by a geologist from our firm who collected representative bulk and undisturbed samples for appropriate laboratory testing. Logs of the borings are presented in Appendix B. The locations of the borings are presented on the enclosed Geotechnical Map, Plate 1. REGIONAL GEOLOGY The subject property is located within a prominent natural geomorphic province in southwestern California known as the Peninsular Ranges. It is characterized by steep, elongated mountain ranges and valleys that trend northwesterly. The mountain ranges are underlain by basement rocks consisting of pre-Cretaceous metasedimentary rocks, Jurassic metavolcanic rocks, and Cretaceous plutonic rocks of the southern California batholith. In the San Diego region, deposition occurred during the Cretaceous period and Cenozoic era in the continental margin of a forearc basin. Sediments, derived from Cretaceous-age plutonic rocks and Jurassic-age volcanic rocks, were deposited into the narrow, steep, coastal plain and continental margin of the basin. These rocks have been uplifted, eroded and deeply incised. During early Pleistocene time, a broad coastal plain was developed from the deposition of marine terrace deposits. During mid to late Pleistocene time, this plain was uplifted, eroded, and incised. Alluvial deposits have since filled the lower valleys, and young marine sediments are currently being deposited/eroded within coastal and beach areas. EARTH MATERIALS Earth materials encountered on the site consist of artificial fill and Santiago Formation. Artificial Fill (Mal? Symbol - At) Artificial fill was encountered in all borings excavated onsite. Artificial fill materials encountered onsite generally consisted of yellow brown to gray brown to orange to brown to dark brown silty sand to a dark brown clayey silt containing variable amounts of localized organics. The materials generally were dry to wet and loose/soft to dense. Thickness of the artificial fill is on the order of ±4 to ± 11 feet. Due to the relatively loose and weathered condition of the upper ± 12 inches, this material is not considered suitable for structural support and should be removed, moisture conditioned, and recompacted and/or processed Ms. Kim Welshon W.O. 331 0-A2-SC 2121 Placido Court, Carlsbad July 29, 2002 FiIe:e:\wp73300\331Oa2.pge Page 3 GeoSoils, Inc. in place, should settlement-sensitive improvements be proposed within their limits. Based on our review and field density data, fill soils underlying this near surface zone appears to exhibit relative compaction greater than 90 percent and may be suitable for support of structure and improvements. Santiago Formation (Not MaDDed) The Tertiary-age Santiago Formation underlies the site at depth: As encountered in ourtest excavations, this unit generally consists of a gray brown to yellow brown to orange, silty sandstone. This material generally is damp to moist and is dense to very dense with depth. Iron oxide staining of sand grains was observed. Structures within this bedrock material appears to be relatively flay lying. FAULTING AND REGIONAL SEISMICITY Faulting The site is situated in an area of active as well as potentially-active faults. Our review indicates that there are no known active faults crossing the site within the areas proposed for development (Jennings, 1994; Tan and Kennedy, 1996), and the site is not within an Earthquake Fault Zone (Hart and Bryant, 1997). There are a number of faults in the southern California area that are considered active and would have an effect on the site in the form of ground shaking, should they, be the source of an earthquake. These include-but are not limited to-the San Andreas fault, the San Jacinto fault, the Elsinore fault, the Coronado Bank fault zone, and the Newport-Inglewood/Rose Canyon fault zone. The location of these and other major faults relative to the site are indicated on Figure 2. The possibility of ground acceleration or shaking at the site may be considered as approximately similar to the southern California region as whole. The following table lists the major faults and fault zones in southern California that could have a significant effect on the site should they experience significant activity. Ms. Kim Weishon W.O. 3310-A2-SC 2121 Placido Court, Carlsbad July 29, 2002 FiIe:e:\wp7\33003310a2.pge Page 4 GeoSoils, Inc. W.O. 3310-A2.SC Figure 2 ABBREVIATED FAULT NAME APPROXIMATE DISTANCE• MILES (KM) Coronado Bank- Agua Blanca 21(35) .Elsinore . 24(38). La Nacion 23 (37) Newpoil-Inglewood-Offshore . 9 (14) Rose Canyon : (8) IF• San Diego Trough-Bahia 501 . 31(50) Seismicity The acceleration-attenuation relations. of Joyner and Boore (1982), Campbell and Bozorgnia (1994), and Sadigh and others (1989) have been incorporated into EQFAULT (Blake, 1997). For this study, peak horizontal ground accelerations anticipated at the site were determined based on the random mean plus 1 - sigma attenuation curves developed by Joyner and Boore (1982), Campbell and Borzorgnia (1994), and Sadigh and others (1989). These acceleration-attenuation relations have been incorporated in EQFAULT, a computer program by Thomas F. Blake (1997), which performs deterministic seismic hazard analyses using up to 150 digitized California faults as earthquake sources. The program estimates the closest distance between each fault and a user-specified file. If a fault is found to be within a user-selected radius, the program estimates peak horizontal ground acceleration that may occur at the site from the upper bound ("maximum credible") and "maximum probable" earthquakes on that fault. Site acceleration (g) is computed by any of the 14 user-selected acceleration-attenuation relations that are contained in EQFAULT. Based on the above, peak horizontal ground accelerations from an upper bound event may be on the order of 0.46 g to 0.66 g, and a maximum probable event may be on the order of 0.30 g to 0.37 g. Seismic Shaking Parameters Based on the site conditions, Chapter 16 of the Uniform Building Code (International Conference of Building Officials, 1997), the following seismic parameters are provided: Ms. Kim Welshon W.O. 3310-A2-SC 2121 Placido Court, Carlsbad July 29, 2002 1FiIe:e:\wp7\3300\3310a2.pge Page 6 GeoSoils, Inc. Seismic zone (per Figure 162*) 4 Seismic Zone Factor (per Table 161*) 0.40 Soil Profile Type (per Table 16J*) SD Seismic Coefficient Ca (per Table 160*) 0.44 Na Seismic Coefficient C (per Table 16-R*) 0.64 N Near Source Factor Na (per Table 16.S*) 1.0 Near Source Factor N (per Table 16T*) 1.18 Seismic Source Type (per Table 16U*) B Distance to Seismic Source 5.8 ml (9.3 km) Upper Bound Earthquake M 6.9 * Figure and table references from Chapter 16 of the Uniform Building Code (1997). GROUNDWATER Subsurface water was not encountered within the property during field work performed in preparation of this report. Subsurface water is not anticipated to adversely affect site development, provided that the recommendations contained in this report are incorporated into final design and construction. These observations reflect site conditions at the time of our investigation and do not preclude future changes in local groundwater conditions from excessive irrigation, precipitation, or that were hot obvious, at the time of our investigation. Seeps, springs, or other indications of a high groundwater level were not noted on the subject property during the time of our field investigation. However, seepage may occur locally (due to heavy precipitation or irrigation) in areas where fill soils overlie bedrock deposits. The regional water table is estimated to be at least 100 feet below existing grade. LABORATORY TESTING Laboratory tests were performed on a representative sample of representative site earth materials in order to evaluate their physical characteristics. Test procedures used and results obtained are presented below. Laboratory Standard The maximum density and optimum moisture content was determined for the major soil type encountered in the borings The laboratory standard used was ASTM 0-1557. The moisture-density relationship obtained for this soil is shown in the following table: Ms. Kim Weishon W.O. 3310-A2-SC 2121 Placido Court, Carlsbad July 29, 2002 FiIe:e:wp7\3300\331Oa2.pge Page 7 GeoSoils, Inc. LOCATION SOIL TYPE MAXIMUM DENSITY (PCF) OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT (%) B-i © 2-5' Silty Sand, Yellow Gray 119.5 13.5 B-i © 15-18' Silty Sand, Yellow Gray 119.5 13.5 Expansion Potential Expansion testing was performed on representative samples of site soil in accordance with UBC Standard 18-2 (UBC, 1997). The results of expansion testing are presented in the following table. : -EXPANSION INDEX.'.. :-EXPANSION -POTENTIAL B-1@ 2-5' 5 Very Low Shear Testing Shear testing was performed on a representative, "undisturbed" sample of site soil (B-i @ 2 feet) in general accordance with ASTM test method D-3080 in a Direct Shear Machine of the strain control type. The shear test results are presented as in Plate C-i in Appendix C, and as follows: I PRIMARY I RESIDUAL - SAMPLE LOCATION COHESION FRICTION COHESION FN (PSF) - (DEGREES (PS9 (DEGREESV. B-1@2' 680 38 155 37 Consolidation Testing Consolidation tests were performed on selected undisturbed samples. Testing, was performed in general accordance with ASTM test method D-2435. Test results are presented in Appendix C. Ms. Kim Welshon W.O. 331 0-A2-SC 2121 Placido Court, Carlsbad July 29, 2002 Ale:e:\wp7\3300\3310a2.pge . Page 8 GeoSoils, Inc. Corrosion/Sulfate Testing Sulfate testing indicates that site soils have a negligible exposure to concrete per Table 19- A-4 of the 1997 UBC (water extractable sulfate = 0.031 percent by weight). Corrosion testing (pH, resistivity) indicates that soils are slightly acidic (pH = 6.5); however, they appear to be corrosive (saturated resistivity = 1,000 ohms-cm) to ferrous metals. EXISTING FILL EVALUATION As indicated in the "laboratory testing" section; GSI performed in-situ moisture and density testing of the existing fill. The fill tested appears to have relative compactions greater than 90 percent. As indicated previously, due to the age, lack of documentation, and changes in standards of practice since the fill was initially placed, it is possible that variations in the fill quality and its suitability may exist. Accordingly, the above statement should not be construed as indicating that the existing fill meets or does not meet the current standards of practice. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS General Based on our field exploration, laboratory testing and geotechnical engineering analysis, it is our opinion that the subject site appears suitable for the proposed additions from a geotechnical engineering and geologic viewpoint, provided that the recommendations presented in the following sections are incorporated into the design and construction phases of site development. The primary geotechnical concerns with respect to the proposed development and improvements are: Earth materials characteristics and depth to competent bearing material. Potential for settlement. Potential for superstructure crackingat the old construction/new construction interlace above the existing foundation. Expansion and corrosion potential of site soils. Subsurface water and potential for perched water. Regional seismic activity. Due to the age and lack of documentation for the existing artificial fill, as well as changes in the standards of practice since that time, it is possible that variations in the uniformity and suitability of the existing fill for its intended use may exist. Although GSI did not encounter such zones, the potential for fill settlement and associated distress to existing and proposed improvements cannot be entirely precluded. GSI is not stating that such a condition will occur, but merely that this potential exists. This should be considered during project design and construction. Ms. Kim Weishon W.O. 331 0-A2-SC 2121 Placido Court, Carlsbad July 29, 2002 File:e:\wp7\3300\3310a2.pge Page 9 GeoSoils, Inc. The recommendations presented herein consider these as well as other aspects of the site. In the event that any significant changes are made to proposed site development, the conclusions and recommendations contained in this report shall not be considered valid unless the changes are reviewed and the recommendations of this report verified or modified in writing by this office. Foundation design parameters are considered preliminary until the foundation design, layout, and structural loads are provided to this office for review. EARTHWORK CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATIONS General All grading should conform to the guidelines presented in Appendix Chapter A33 of the Uniform Building Code, the requirements of the City of Carlsbad, the requirements of the County of San Diego, and as presented in the text of this report. Prior to grading, a GSI representative should be present at the preconstruction meeting to provide additional grading guidelines, if needed, and review the earthwork schedule. During earthwork construction all site preparation and the general grading procedures of the contractor should be observed and the fill selectively tested by a representative (s) of GSI. If unusual or unexpected conditions are exposed in the field, they should be reviewed by this office and if warranted, modified and/or additional recommendations will be offered. All applicable requirements of local and national construction and general industry safety orders, the Occupational Safety and Health Act, and the Construction Safety Act should be met. Site Preparation All debris, vegetation and other deleterious material should be removed from the building area prior to the start of. construction. Sloping areas to receive fill should be properly benched in accordance with current industry standards of practice and guidelines specified in the Uniform Building Code. Removals (Unsuitable Surficial Materials) Due to the relatively loose/soft and compressible condition the near surface weathered artificial fill, the upper 12 inches of these materials should be removed and recompacted in areas proposed for settlement sensitive structures or areas to receive compacted fill. At this time, removal depths on the order of ±12 inches should be anticipated; however, locally deeper removals may be necessary, and the quality of the fill should be further evaluated as exposed. Removals should be completed below a 1:1 projection down and away from the edge of any existing settlement sensitive structure to remain, or to 2 feet outside the building footprint, whichever is greater. Once removals are completed, the exposed bottom should be reprocessed and comDacted. Care should be taken to not undermine the existing structure. Shoring may be required. Ms. Kim Welshon W.O. 3310-A2-SC 2121 Placido Court, Carlsbad July 29, 2002 F1Ie:e:\wp73300\3310a2.pge Page 10 GeoSoils, Inc. Fill Placement Subsequent to ground preparation, onsite soils maybe placed in thin (±6-inch) lifts, cleaned of vegetation and debris, brought to a least optimum moisture content, and compacted to achieve a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent. If soil importation is planned, a sample of the soil import should be evaluated by this office prior to importing, in order to assure compatibility with the onsite site soils and the recommendations presented in this report. Import soils for a fill cap should be low expansive (E.l. less than 50). In the event additional grading is proposed in the future at the subject site, all grading should conform to the guidelines presented in Appendix Chapter A33 of the Uniform Building Code (adopted and current edition), the requirements of City of Carlsbad, and County of San Diego (as appropriate jurisdiction applies). RECOMMENDATIONS - FOUNDATIONS Existing Foundations Based upon our preliminary evaluation, an allowable bearing value of 2,000 pounds per square foot has been determined for bearing soil supporting the existing foundation system which maintains a minimum width of 12 inches and a minimum depth of 12 inches of embedment into the underlying artificial fill onsite. 2. Passive earth pressure may be computed as an equivalent fluid having a density of 250 pounds per cubic foot, with a maximum earth pressure of 2,500 pounds per square foot. An allowable coefficient of friction between. soil and concrete of 0.35 may be used with the dead load forces. When combining passive pressure and frictional resistance, the passive pressure component should be reduced by one-third. New Foundation Design The foundation systems should be designed and constructed in accordance with guidelines presented in the latest edition of the UBC. All new foundations should be embedded into the underlying artificial fill. An allowable bearing value of 2,000 pounds per square foot may be used for design of footings that maintain a minimum width of 12 inches and a minimum depth of 12 inches, and founded into suitable bearing artificial fill. This value may be increased by 20 percent for each additional 1 2 inches in depth to a maximum value of 2,500 pounds per square foot. In addition, this value may be increased by one- third when considering short duration seismic or wind loads. Isolated pad footings Ms. Kim Welshon • • W.O. 331 O-A2-SC 2121 Placido Court, Carlsbad July 29, 2002 Fi1e:e:\wpl\3300\3310a2.pge Page 11 GeoSoils, Inc. should have a minimum dimension of at least 24 inches square and minimum depth of 18 inches, connected by a grade beam in at least one direction. Passive earth pressure may be computed as an equivalent fluid having a density of 250 pounds per cubic foot, with a maximum earth pressure of 2,500 pounds per square foot. An allowable coefficient of friction between soil and concrete of 0.35 may be used with the dead load forces. 5.. When combining passive pressure and frictional resistance, the passive pressure component should be reduced by one-third. Soil generated from footing excavations to be used onsite should be moisture conditioned to at least optimum moisture content and compacted to at least 90 percent minimum relative compaction, whether it is to be placed inside the foundation perimeter, orin other areas. This material must not alter positive drainage patterns that direct drainage away from the structural area and toward the street. Expansion/construction joints for differential movement between proposed and existing structures should be provided by the structural engineer/architect. New Foundation Construction The following foundation construction recommendations are presented as minimum criteria from a soils engineering viewpoint. Our recommendations are presented assuming that bearing soils consist of suitable artificial fill materials with a very low expansion potential (E. 1. 0 to 20). Recommendations by the project structural engineer or architect, which may exceed the soils engineer's recommendations, should take precedence over the following minimumS recommendations: Continuous exterior and interior footings should be founded a minimum depth of 24 inches for one- and two-story loads (below lowest existing grade) into artificial fill. All footings should be reinforced with two No.4 reinforcing bars, one placed nearthe top and one placed near the bottom of the footing. Footing widths should be as indicated in the UBC (International Conference of Building Officials, 1997). 2. Isolated column and panel pads or wall footings should be founded at a minimum depth of 24 inches (below lowest existing grade) into artificial fill. All footings should be reinforced with a minimum of two No.4 reinforcing bars, placed each way and in accordance with the recommendations of the structural engineer. Ms. Kim Weishon . W.O. 331 0-A2-8C 2121 Placido Court, Carlsbad July 29, 2002 Fi1e:e:\wp7\3300\3310a2.pge . . . Page 12 GeoSoils, Inc. A grade beam, reinforced as above, and at least 12 inches wide should be provided across large (e.g., garage) entrances. The base of the grade beam should be at the same elevation as the bottom of adjoining footings. If slabs are proposed where moisture condensation is undesirable, concrete slabs should be underlain with a vapor barrier consisting of a minimum 1 0-mil, polyvinyl- chloride or equivalent membrane, with all laps sealed. This membrane should, be placed between a minimum of two inch thick beds of sand to aid in uniform curing of the concrete. If proven by testing (i.e., sand equivalent greater than 30 and less than 1/4-inch in any size dimension), some of the native sands could be utilized on top of the visqueen. Concrete slabs should be a minimum of 5 inches thick and should be reinforced with No. 3 reinforcement bars placed on 18-inch centers (per the UBC) in two perpendicular directions, or 6 x 6 w1.4 x w1.4 welded mesh. All slab reinforcement should be supported and positioned nearthe vertical midpoint of the slab. "Hooking" of reinforcement is not an acceptable method of positioning. A construction joint is recommended to allow differential movement between existing and new structures. The project architect/structural engineer should provide mitigation for relative movement between the new and old construction, above the construction joint. Presaturation is not required for these soil conditions. However, the moisture content of the subgrade soils should be at least optimum moisture content prior to pouring any proposed slabs and prior to placing visqueen or reinforcement. ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS/DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA Tile Flooring Tile flooring can crack, typically reflecting cracks in the concrete slab below the tile. Therefore, the designer should consider additional steel reinforcement of concrete slabs on- grade where tile will be placed. The tile installer should consider installation methods that reduce possible cracking of the tile such as slipsheets. Slipsheets or a vinyl crack isolation membrane (approved by the Tile Council of America/Ceramic Tile Institute) is recommended between tile and concrete slabs on grade. Gutters and DownsDouts Consideration should be given to the installation of gutters and downspouts to collect roof water that may otherwise infiltrate the soils adjacent to the structures. The downspouts should be drained away from the foundation and collected in drainage swales or other approved non-erosive drainage systems designed by a registered civil engineer Ms. Kim Weishon W.O. 331 O-A2-SC 2121 Placido Court, Carlsbad July 29, 2002 Fi1e:e:\wp7\3300\3310a2.pge Page 13 GeoSoils, Inc. (specializing in drainage) to convey water away from the foundation. Gutters and downspouts are not a geotechnical requirement, however, provided positive drainage is maintained in accordance with the recommendations of the design civil engineer. Exterior Slabs and Walkways Exterior concrete slab on grade construction should be designed and constructed in accordance with the following criteria: Driveway pavement and all other exterior flatwork should be a minimum of 4 inches thick. A thickened edge should be considered for, all flatwork adjacent to irrigated and landscape areas. Slab subgrade should be scarified, moisture conditioned, and compacted to a minimum 95 percent relative compaction. Subgrade should be moisture conditioned based on the representative expansion potential of the subgrade exposed (i.e., at least optimum moisture for very low expansive soils). The subgrade moisture content should be maintained until the slab is poured. The use of transverse and longitudinal control joints should be considered to help control slab cracking due to concrete shrinkage or expansion. Two of the best ways to control this movement is; 1) add a sufficient amount of reinforcing steel, increasing tensile strength of the slab, and/or 2) provide an adequate amount of control and/or expansion joints to accommodate anticipated concrete shrinkage and expansion. We would suggest that the maximum control joint spacing for un-reinforced slabs be placed on 8-foot centers (4-inch slab), 10-foot centers (5-inch slab) or the smallest dimension of the slab, whichever is least. No traffic should be allowed upon the newly poured concrete slabs until they have been properly cured to within 75 percent of design strength. - Positive site drainage should be maintained at all times. Adjacent landscaping should be graded to drain into an approved area. All surface water should be appropriately directed to areas designed for site drainage. Concrete compression strength should be a minimum of 2,500 psi. Landscape Maintenance and Planting Water has been shown to weaken the inherent strength of soil, and slope stability is significantly reduced by overly wet conditions. Positive surface drainage away from graded slopes should be maintained and only the amount of irrigation necessary to sustain plant life should be provided for planted slopes. Over-watering should be avoided. Onsite soil materials should be maintained in a solid to semisolid state. Ms. Kim Weishon W.O. 3310-A2-SC 2121 Placido Court, Carlsbad July 29, 2002 FiIe:e:wp73300\3310a2.pge Page 14 GeoSoils, Inc. Brushed native and graded slopes (constructed within and utilizing onsite materials) would be potentially erosive. Eroded debris may be minimized and surficial slope stability enhanced by establishing and maintaining a suitable vegetation cover soon after construction. Plants selected for landscaping should be lightweight, deep rooted types that require little water and are capable of surviving the prevailing climate. Planting of large trees with potential for extensive root development should not be placed closer than 10 feet from the perimeter of the foundation or the anticipated height of the mature tree, whichever is greater. It order to minimize erosion on the slope face, an erosion control fabric (i.e., jute matting) should be considered. From a geotechnical standpoint, leaching is not recommended for establishing landscaping. If the surface soils area processed for the purpose of adding amendments they should be recompacted to 90 percent minimum relative compaction. Moisture sensors, embedded into fill slopes, should be considered to reduce the potential of overwatering from automatic landscape watering systems. The use of certain fertilizers may affect the corrosion characteristics of soil. Review of the type and amount (pounds per acre) of the fertilizers by a corrosion specialiét should be considered. Recommendations for exterior concrete flatwork design and construction can be provided upon request. If in the future, any additional improvements are planned for the site, recommendations concerning the geological or geotechnical aspects of design and construction of said improvements could be provided upon request. This office should be notified in advance of any additional fill placement, regrading of the site, or trench backfilling after rough grading has been completed. This includes any grading, utility trench, and retaining wall backfills. Drainage Positive site drainage should be maintained at all times. Drainage should not flow uncontrolled down any descending slope. Water should be directed away from foundations and not allowed to pond and/or seep into the ground. Pad drainage should be directed toward the street or other approved area. Landscaping should be graded to drain into the street, or other approved area. All surface water should be appropriately directed to areas designed for site drainage. Roof gutters and down spouts should be considered to control roof drainage. Down spouts should outlet a minimum of 5 feet from proposed structures or tightlined into a subsurface drainage system. We recommend that any proposed open bottom planters adjacent to proposed structures be eliminated for a minimum distance of 10 feet. As an alternative, closed bottom type planters could be utilized. An outlet placed in the bottom of the planter, could be installed to direct drainage away from structures or any exterior concrete flatwork. Drainage behind top of walls should be accomplished along the length of the wall with a paved channel drainage v-ditch or substitute. Ms. Kim Weishon W.O. 331 O-A2-SC 2121 Placido Court, Carlsbad July 29, 2002 FiIe:e:\wp7\3300\3310a2.pge Page 15 GeoSoils, Inc. Footing Trench Excavation All footing trench excavations should be observed and approved by a representative of this office prior to placing reinforcement. Footing trench spoil and any excess soils generated from utility trench excavations should be compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent, if not removed from the site. Trench Backfill All excavations should be observed by one of our representatives and conform to OSHA and local safety codes. Exterior trenches should not be excavated below a 1:1 projection from the bottom of any adjacent foundation system. If excavated, these trenches may undermine support for the foundation system potentially creating adverse conditions. All utility trench backfill in slopes, structural areas and beneath hardscape features should be brought to near optimum moisture content and then compacted to obtain a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent of the laboratory standard. Observations, probing and, if deemed necessary, testing should be performed by a representative of this office to verify compactive efforts of the contractor. Soils generated from utility trench excavations should be compacted to a minimum of 90 percent (ASTM D-1 557) if not removed from the site. Jetting of backfill is not recommended. The use of pipe jacking to place utilities is not recommended on this site due to the presence. of gravels and cobbles. Bottoms of utility trenches should be sloped away from structures. FOOTING SETBACKS All footings should maintain a minimum 7-foot horizontal setback from the base of the footing to any descending slope. This distance is measures from the footing face at the bearing elevation. Footings should maintain a minimum horizontal setback of H/3 (H = slope height) from the base of the footing to the descending slope face and no less than 7 feet nor need to be greater than 40 feet. Footings adjacent to unlined drainage swales should be deepened to a minimum of 6 inches below the invert of the adjacent unlined swale. Ms. Kim Welshon W.O. 331 0-A2-SC 2121 Placido Court, Carlsbad July 29, 2002 FiIe:e:\wp73300\3310a2.pge Page 16 GeoSoils, Inc. PLAN REVIEW Final project plans should be reviewed by this office prior to construction, so that construction is in accordance with this report. Based on our review, supplemental recommendations and/or further geotechnical studies may be warranted. INVESTIGATION LIMITATIONS Inasmuch as our study is based upon the site materials observed, selective laboratory testing and engineering analysis, the conclusions and recommendations are professional opinions. These opinions have been derived in accordance with current standards of practice, and no warranty is expressed or implied. Standards of practice are subject to. change with time. . . These opinions have been derived in accordance with current standards of practice, and no warranty is expressed or implied. Standards of practice are subject to change with time. GSI assumes no responsibility or liability for work or testing performed by others, for our scope-of-work was expressly limited to the evaluation of the sediments/soils underlying the proposed residence. In addition, this report may be subject to review by the controlling authorities. Ms. Kim Weishon W.O. 3310-A2-SC 2121 Placido Court, Carlsbad . . July 29, 2002 FiIe:e:\wp733OO\331Oa2.pge : . . Page 17 GeoSoils, Inc. PLACIDO COURT LEGEND a f Artificial fill B-4 Approximate location 01 TD5' exploratory boring. PROPERTY LINE U Base Map provided by client. LOS ANGELES CO. RIVERSIDE CO. ORANGE CO. GEOTECHNICAL "DIEGO CO. MAP 2121 Placido CoUrt Plate 'l PROPERTY LINE Area of ,1 APPENDIX A REFERENCES APPENDIX A REFERENCES Blake, Thomas F., 1997, EQFAULT computer program and users manual for the deterministic prediction of horizontal accelerations from digitized California faults. Campbell, K.W., 1994, Empirical prediction of near-source ground motion from large earthquakes, in Johnson, J.A., Campbell, K.W., and. Blake, eds., T.F., AEG Short Course, Seismic Hazard Analysis, June 18. Greensfelder, R. W., 1974, Maximum credible rock acceleration from earthquakes in California: California Division of Mines and Geology, Map Sheet 23. Hart; E.W. and Bryant, W.A., 1997, Fault-rupture hazard zones in California: California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology, Special Publication 42. Housner, G. W., 1970, Strong ground motion in Earthquake Engineering, Robert Wiegel, ed., Prentice-Hall. International Conference of Building Officials, 1997, Uniform building code: Whittier, California. Jennings, C.W., 1994, Fault activity map of California and adjacent areas: California Division of Mines and Geology, Map Sheet No. 6, scale 1:750,000. Joyner, W.B, and Boore, D.M., 1994 a, Estimation of response-spectral values as functions of magnitude, distance and site conditions, in Johnson, J.A., Campbell, K.W., and Blake, eds., T.F., AEG Short Course, Seismic Hazard Analysis, June 18. - 1994 b, Prediction of earthquake response spectra, in Johnson, J.A., Campbell, K.W., and Blake, eds., T.F., AEG Short Course, Seismic Hazard Analysis, June 18. Sadigh, K., Egan, J., and Youngs, R., 1989, Predictive ground motion equations reported in Joyner, W.B., and Boore, D.M., "Measurement, characterization, and prediction of strong ground motion", in Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics II, Recent Advances in Ground Motion Evaluation, Von Thun, J.L, ed.: American Society of Civil Engineers Geotechnical Special Publication No. 20, pp. 43-102. Sowers and Sowers, 1970, Unified soil classification system (After U. S. Waterways Experiment Station and ASTM 02487-667) in Introductory Soil Mechanics, New York. Tan, S.S., and Kennedy, Michael P., 1996, Geologic maps of the northwestern part of San Diego County, California: California Division of Mines and Geology, Open File Report 96-02. GeoSoits, Inc. APPENDIX B BORING LOGS AND TEST PITS BORING LOG GeoSoils, Inc. w.o. 3310-A2-SC PROJECT: WELSHON BORING B-i SHEET 1 OF 2121 Placido Court, Carlsbad DATE EXCA VA TED 5-29-02 - Sample - SAMPLE METHOD. LIMITED ACCESS HOLLOW STEM AUGER140 LBSI3O_DROP Standard Penetration Test Water Seepage into hole - Undisturbed, Ring Sample CL 2 Q). _____ Description of Material S -. ARTIFICIAL FILL: @0' SILTY SAND, yellow brown to brown to orange to gray brown, moist, • -• medium dense to dense. 43 59.1 51 113.0 10.4 : S..-. 32 1081 117 586 10- 71 111.1 13.6 73.7 -'- @ 11' SILTY SANDSTONE, yellow brown to gray brown to orange, damp to moist, dense to very dense; iron oxide staining. 57 I I 107.3 111.4 I 55.8 73 I I 105.0 113.0 I 60.0 84 I I 109.8 113.7 I 71.7 1001 uepin = zu- No Groundwater/Caving Backtllled 5-29-02 2121 Placido Court, Carlsbad GeoSoils, Inc. PLATE B-I BORING LOG GeoSoils, Inc. WO. 3310-A2-SC PROJECT: WELSHON BORING B-2 SHEET 1 0F1 2121 Placido Court, Carlsbad DATE EXCA VA TED 5-29-02 - Sample - SAMPLE METHOD. LIMITED ACCESS HOLLOW STEM AUGER 140 LBS/30" DROP Standard Penetration Test Water Seepage into hole - .2 Undisturbed, Ring Sample CL a 0 E • Description of Material ARTIFICIAL FILL: SM 110.5 17.5 93.3 •• 0' CLAYEY SILT, dark brown, moist to wet, soft; abundant organics, llandscapedzone © ,4' SILTY SAND, yellow brown to gray brown to orange to dark brown, ....- moist, medium dense; trace organics. 34 SM 1092 88 454 -57 109.1 iT 56.1 .. SANTIAGO FORMATION: ('4 • @ 10' SILTY SANDSTONE, gray brown to yellow brown to orange, damp to moist, dense; iron oxide staining. 15 66 1056 101 474 20 70 112.4 11.2 62.7.: Total Depth 21' No Groundwater/Caving Backfllled 5-29-02 25 GeoSoils, Inc. 2121 Placido Court, Carlsbad PLATE B-2 BORING LOG GeoSoils, Inc. WO. 3310-A2-SC PROJECT:WELSHON BORING B-3 SHEETIOF1 2121 Placido Court, Carlsbad DATE EXCAVATED 5-29-02 - Sample - - SAMPLE METHOD: HAND AUGER/RING SAMPLER Standard Penetration Test Ile 0 Water Seepage into hole Undisturbed, Ring SampleCL • Description of Material _____ SM -. ARTIFICIAL FILL: @ 0' SILTY SAND, yellow brown to gray brown to orange, dry, loose; abundant organics. @ W SILTY SAND, yellow brown to gray brown to orange to dark brown, - moist, medium dense; trace organics. 114.7 12.8 76.8 - 5-- - - - _____ - ____ SANTIAGO FORMATION: @4W SILTY SANDSTONE, gray brown to yellow brown to orange, moist, - Idense; iron oxide staining. - Total Depth =5' No Groundwater/Caving - Backfilled 5-29-02 15- 20- 25- GeoSoils, Inc. 2121 Placido Court, Carlsbad PLATE B-3 BORING LOG GeoSoils, Inc. WO. 3310-A2-SC PROJECT: WELSHON BORING B4 SHEET OF 2121 Placido Court, Carlsbad DATE EXCAVATED _5-29-02 - Sample - SAMPLE METHOD. HAND AUGER/RING SAMPLER Standard Penetration Test . Water Seepage into hole a 0 Undisturbed, Ring Sample .-. . ______________________ P=1 na _____ Description of Material SM ARTIFICIAL FILL 109.3 10.7 @ 0' SILTY SAND, brown, damp, loose; trace organics. 55.3 @ 1/21 SILTY SAND, yellow brown to gray brown to brown to orange, moist, medium dense to dense. • - - - - _____ - '4-.. SANTIAGO FORMATION: 5--- - - _______ - - @ 4' SILTY SANDSTONE, yellow brown to gray brown to orange, damp to moist, very dense;ironoxidestaining. • Refusal @ 5' • No Groundwater/Caving Backfllled 5-29-02 10- 15- 20- 25- GeoSoils, Inc. 2121 Placido Court, Carlsbad PLATE B-4 APPENDIX C LABORATORY DATA DEC-16-2002 NON 05:22 PM CITY OF CARSLBAD FAX NO, 760 602 8558 P. 02 City of Carlsbad CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANqE PAYMENT OF SCHOOL FEES OR OTHER MITIGATION This form must be computed by the City, the applicant, and the approptiato school districts and returned to the City prior to issuing a building permit. The City will not issue any building permit without a completed school fee form. Project Name: Building Permit Plan Check Number: Project Address: A.PN.: Project Applicant (Owner Name(s): Project Description: BUILDING TYPE: Residential: Second Dwelling Unit: Residential Additions: WELSHONS & BEVERLY RESIDENCE C8022379 2121 PLACIDO COURT 216-492-06-00 KIM WELSHONS V & KEITH BEVERLY -- 21'11sf addition I V WOOD FRAME CONSTRUCTION . Number of New Dwelling Units NA Square Feet of Living Area in New Dwelling Square Feet of Living Area in SDU V Net Square Feet New Area 21111 Sf addition Commercial/Industrial: City Oertification of applicants information: SCHOOL DISTRIcTS WITHIN THE CLU OF CARLSBAD Carlsbad Unified School District San Marcos Unified School District 801 Pine Ave. 215 Mate Way Carlsbad CA 92009 (729-9291) San Marcos, CA 92069 (290-2649) Encinitas Union School District San Diegulto Union High School District 101 South Rancho Santa Fe Rd 710 Encinitas Blvd. Fncinhtas, CA 92024 (944-4300) Encinitas, CA 92024 (753-5491) Certification of Apphcantlowners. The person executing this declaration 'OWfl5f) certifies under penalty or perjury that (1) the Information provided above Is correct and true to the best of the Owner's knowledge, and that the Owner will file an amended certification of payment and pay the additional tee If Owner requests an increase in the number of dwelling units or square footage after the building permit Is Issued or If the initial determination of units or square footage is found to be incorrect, and that (2) the Owner Is the owner/ developer of the above described project(s), or that the person executing this declaration Is authorized to sign on behalf of the Owner. Signature: Date: SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL FEE CERTIFICATION (To be completed by the school district(s)) 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad CA 92008-7314 u (760) 602-2700 • FAX (760) 602-8580 DEC-16-2002 NON 05:23 PM CITY OF CRRSLBAD FAX NO, 760 602 8558 P. 04 THIS FORM INDICATES THAT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROJECT HAVE BEEN OR WILL BE SATISFIED. SCHOOL DISTRICT: The undersigned, being duly authorized by the applicable School District, certifies that the developer, builder, or owner has satisfied the obligation for school facitie. This is to certify that the applicant listed on page 1 has paid all amounts or completed other applicable school mitigation determined by the School District. The City may issue building permits for this project. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICIAL TITLE NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT DATE PHONE NUMBER Vsh 1 -7 Ib C7c'd) Q(J/rq3Q Carlsbad Unified School District 801 Pine Ave. Carlsbad CA 92009 (729-9291) San Marcos Unified School District 215 Mata Way :.................. San Mircos, CA 92069 (2O2649) Encinitas Union School District 101 South Rancho Santa Fe Rd Encinitas, CA 92024 (944-4300) San Diegulto Union High School District 710 Encinitas Blvd. Encinitas, CA 92024 (753-6491) DEC-16-2002 NON 05:23 PM CITY OF CARSLBAD FAX NO 760 602 8558 P. 03 of Carlsbad This form must be completed by the City. the applicant, and the appropriate school districts and returned to the City prior to issuing a building permit. The City will not Issue any building permit without a completed school fee forrri Project Name: Building Permit Plan Check Number: Project Address: A.P,N.: Project Applicant (Owner Name(s): Project Description: BUILDING TYPE: Residential: WELSHONS & BEVERLY RESIDENCE CB022379 2121 PLACIDO COURT -- 216-492-06-00 KIM WELSHONS & KEITH BEVERLY 21.11 sf addition WOOD FRAME CONSTRUCTION Number of New Dwelline Units Square Feet of Living Area in New Dwelling Second Dwelling Unit: - Square Feet of Living Area in SDU Residential Additions: Net Square Feet New Area 21,71 sf addition Commerciallindustrlal: Square Feet Floor Area NA City Certification of applicant's information: Certification of ApplicantIOwners The person executing this dectaratio(' ne ce,tileunderg Ity of perjury that (1) the Information provided above Is correct and true to the best of the Owner's knowledge, and that the Owner will file an amended certification of payment and pay the additional fee if Owner requests an increase In the number of dwelling Units or square footage after the building permit Is Issued or If the initial determination of units or square footage Is found to be incorrect, and that (2) the Owner is the owned developer of the above described project(s), or that the person executing this declaration is authorized to sign on behalf of the Owner. Signature: - Date: D' ii1J2- SCH FEE CERTIFICATION (To be completed by the school district(s)) 1636 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-2700 • FAX (760) 602-8560 DEC-18-2002 NON 05:24 PN CITY OF CRSLB.D FAX NO, 760 602 8558 P. 05 ** ** w THIS FORM INDICATES THAT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROJECT HAVE BEEN OR WILL. BE SATISFIED, SCHOOL DISTRICT: The undersigned, being duly authorized by the applicable School District, certifies that the developer, builder, or owner has satisfied the obligation for school facilities. This is to certify, that the applicant listed on page 1 has paid all amounts or completed other applicable school mitigation determined by the School District, The City may issue building permits for this project. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICIAL 1p TITLE NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT DATE PHONE NUMBER Eric J. Hall Asst. Superintendent, Business SAN D1ii DftCr OOL Tl(eo- 13i1 eivggq niirin City of Carlsbad I1 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 07-24-2003 ' Plan Check Revision Permit No: PCR03132 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 Job Address: 2121 PLACIDO CT CBAD Permit Type: PCR Status: ISSUED Parcel No: 2164920600 Lot #: 0 Applied: 07/01/2003 Valuation: $0.00 Construction Type: NEW Entered By: RMA Reference #: Plan Approved: 07/24/2003 Issued: 07/24/2003 Project Title: WELSHONS RES-REVISE FIREPLACE Inspect Area: Applicant: Owner: JOHN BEERY BEVERLY DONALD K&WELSHONS KIM 2121 PLACIDOCT CARLSBAD CA 92009 0361 07/24/03 0002 01 02 COP 120-00 Plan Check Revision Fee $120.00 Additional Fees $0.00 Total Fees: $120.00 Total Payments To Date: $0.00 Balance Due: $120.00 FINAL APPROVAL Inspector: Date: ______________ Clearance: NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the imposition of lees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as fees/exactions? You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection lees and capacity changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project NOR DOES IT APPLY to any FOR OFFICE USE ONLY 12 Legal Description Lot No. Subdivision Name/Number Unit No. Phase No. Total # of units Use of Work SQ. FT. #of Stories # of Bedrooms # of Bathrooms Name— Address S(ate/Zip Telephone # Fax # Name Address Ci y State/Zip - Telephone # 7,77 ... ,......-..,-. ..4 PROPERTYOWNER 1Lrffc4!/ Name Address City State/Zip Telephone # (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law [Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code] or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to ,a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars IS5001). Name Address . . , , City . State/Zip Telephone # State License # License Class City Business License # Designer Name - Address City . State/Zip Telephone State License # QIM Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. . I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Insurance Company Policy No. Expiration Date__________________ (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($1001 OR LESS) CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this' permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), in addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, Interest and attorney's fees SIGNATURE . . .. DATE L7 JOWNER BUILDER DECLARATION ii. TTTI TTETI1TITITIITI2TI I heieby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property 'who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). . I am' exempt under Section _______________ Business and Professions Code for this reason: I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. 0 YES ONO I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. .1 have contracted with the following, person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): 4 I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone number I contractors license number): - 5. I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name I address / phone number I type of work): . . . . PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE DATE.____________________ [COMPLETE THISSECTION EQJVONRESIDEN71AL BUILDING PAMEYS1öNLV Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act?. 0 YES 0 NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? 0 YES 0 NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? 0 YES 0 NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. 18. -CONSTRUCTION LENDING AGENCY.: ' .77 7 - I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097(i) Civil Code). LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS_______________________________________________________ I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is corrict and that thi information on the plans is accurate.. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the City of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. - OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0 deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the bull g 0 cial under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work Uthonzed by such permit is not m ced I n 1 s from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by sugh permit is suspended or abandoned any time after the work is co mence for o 0 days (Section 106.4.4 Uniform Building Code). / APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE - ~ HITE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance / PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008 -r FOR OFFICE USE 1 PLAN CHECK NO EST. VAL. Plan Ck. Deposit Validated By_________________________ Business Name (at this address) Legal Description Lot No. Subdivision Name/Number Unit No. Phase No. Total # of units Assessor's Parcel # - Existing Use Proposed Use FT of Bathrooms (A ) ?-* LL ' J. J\UWI'-' 571 I %...'tf VI'-171f'U m"ri L4's/7d7_ —" 17L Name . Address City State/Zip Telephone # Fax # Name Address City State/Zip Telephone # Name - - Address City State/Zip Telephone # (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its Issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contiactor's License Law (Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code] or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars IS5001). Name Address City State/Zip Telephone # State License # License Class - City Business License # - Designer Name Address City State/Zip Telephone State License # Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Coda, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Insurance Company Policy No. Expiration Date__________________ (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE-PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($1001 OR LESS) CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage Is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), In addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3708 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees. SIGNATURE DATE I heieby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not Intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold wijhin one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). 0 I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). o I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason: . . I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. 0 YES ONO I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. .3. I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name I address I phone number I contractors license number): I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address /. phone number I contractors license number): . I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) thefollowing persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type of work): PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE . DATE.____________________ Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? 0 YES -0 NO - - Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain.a permit from the air Pollution control district or air quality management district? 0 YES 0 NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? 0 YES 0 NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. IN I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097(i) Civil Code). LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS_______________________________________________________ ÜAZ Na I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the. information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the Citt of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT.. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0 deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 atones in height. EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the building Officiai under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void If the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days, from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any tin- fter the work is commenced for a period of 180 days (Section 106A.4 Uniform Building Code). 'APPLICA :; SIGNATURE ..A 4n - '. DATE '° WHITE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance EsGil Corporation In Partners/iip wit/i covernment for gui(iing Safety DATE: July 22, 2003 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 02-2379 SET: II (REV3) PROJECT ADDRESS: 2121 Placido Ct. PROJECT NAME: Weishons Add. - SFD - Proposed plan changes U, NT JURIS. O P REVIEWER O FILE LII The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. LIII The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. LII The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. LII The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. LI The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. LI Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.. Person contacted: Telephone : Date contacted: (by: ) Mail Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS: A. Architectural plans shall be sAned by the architect of record and structural plans shall be signed by thØ engineer. By: Sergio Azuela Enclosures: Esgil Corporation 0 GA 0 MB 0 EJ 0 Pc 7/22 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576 - DATE: July 14, 2003 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 02-2379 EsGil Corporation In cPartners flip with government forui(ing Safety SET: E(REV 3) O APPLICANT JURI O REVIEWER U FILE PROJECT ADDRESS: 2121 Placido Ct. PROJECT NAME: Weishons Add. - SFD - Proposed plan changes LI The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. LI The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. LI The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. LI The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: John S. Beery Architect P.O. Box 130684, Carlsbad, CA 92013-0684 LI Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: John Berry Telephone #: (760) 438-2963 (JIJAJA 1L146(.e) Date contacted:. 11103 (by: Fax #: (760)438-2963 Mail c...—Telephone Fan—' In Person [11 REMARKS: By: Sergio Azuela Enclosures: Esgil Corporation El GA UMB DEJ El PC 7/3 trnsmtLdot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax(858)560-1576 -, I'S Carlsbad 02-2379 July 14,2003 RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST• JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 2121 Placido Ct. DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 7/3 REVIEWED BY: Sergio Azuela FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): PLAN CHECK NO.: 02-2379 SET: I (REV 3) DATE RECHECK COMPLETED: July 14, 2003 This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints to: ESGIL CORPORATION. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews. The original correction number has been given for your reference. In case you did not keep a copy of the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding corrections. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? DYes DNa - e Carlsbad 02-2379 July 14, 2003 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 2. Provide a complete list of all proposed plan changes, including: A brief description of each proposed plan change. The sheet or sheets of plans that shall be modified for each proposed plan change. 'The identification'.symbol and number used to identify the proposed plan change on the plans. 3. Please note that the Masonry Fireplace Standards Drawing and Specifications provided are not applicable for the cases presented on the original plans, since the fireplaces shown on the plans are stacked. Provide sizing calculations per UBC Chapter 31, figure 31-1, for the masonry flue sizing. Additionally, justify the manufacture red chimney extensions sizing and detail the size and shape connection between the masonry and manufacture red chimneys onto the plans. (All' fireplaces) If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Sergio Azüela at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. EsGil Corporation In tFartnership with government for(Building Safety DATE: June 24, 2003 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 02-2379 PCR03-117 SET:I PROJECT ADDRESS: 2121 Placido Ct. PROJECT NAME: Weishons Add. - SFD - Proposed Plan Changes O PLAN REVIEWER O FILE LI The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. LI The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. LI The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. LI The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Wally Brown 3839-1 Vista Campana, Oceanside, CA 2°5A LI Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Wally Brown Date contacted: cb'-I /03 (by: ) Mail "Telephone / Fax—'in Person LI REMARKS: Telephone #: (760) 435-9047 Fax #: (&0)c595951 By: Sergio Azuela Enclosures: Esgil Corporation EJGA MB DEJ DPC 6/16 tmsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad 02-2379 PCR03-117 June 24, 2003 GENERAL PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: Carlsbad 117 PROJECT ADDRESS: 2121 Placido Ct. DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 6/16 REVIEWED BY: Sergio Azuela PLAN CHECK NO.: 02-2379 PCR03- DATE REVIEW COMPLETED: June 24, 2003 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new complete sets of prints to: ESGIL CORPORATION. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where -they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? 13 Yes UNo Carlsbad 02-2379 PCR03-117 June 24,. 2003 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 2. Provide a complete list of all proposed plan changes, including: A brief description of each proposed plan change. The sheet or sheets of plans that shall be modified for each proposed plan change. The identification symbol and number used to identify the proposed plan change on the plans. 3. Please note that all proposed plan changes (hip beam changes) included within the building permit applications, are identical in both sets of plans provided (the new and the approved sets) therefore no plan change is applicable. 4. Please clarify the change for the shear panel on the exterior wall of Bedroom #3 on sheet S2. It appears that the seismic load was reduced from the original set of calculations. Please clarify. Additional corrections may follow. The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Driye, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Sergio Azuela at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. Carlsbad 02-2379 PCR03-117 June 24, 2003 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad 117 PREPARED BY: Sergio Azuela BUILDING ADDRESS: 2121 Placido Ct. BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R-3 & U-i PLAN CHECK NO.: 02-2379 PCR03- DATE: June 24, 2003 SFD/Welshons Res./plan changes TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V-N BUILDING PORTION AREA (Sq. Ft.) Valuation Multiplier Reg. Mod. VALUE ($) Time Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE Jurisdiction Code Icb IBy Ordinance 1994 UBC Building Permit Fee 1994 UBC Plan Check Fee vj I $240.001 Type of Review: 0 Complete Review 0 Structural Only 0 Other ____________ 0 Repetitive Fee I Repeats Hourly I 21 Hours * Esgil Plan Review Fee I $192.0OI * Based on hourly rate Comments: Sheet I of I macvalue.doc I EsGil Corporation In (Partnership with government forui(dIng Safety DATE: July 14, 2003 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 02-2379 PROJECT ADDRESS: 2121 Placido Ct. SET: U(REV 3) U APPLICANT JURI O REVIEWER U FILE PROJECT NAME: Welshons Add. - SFD - Proposed plan changes The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: John S. Beery Architect P.O. Box 130684, Carlsbad, CA 92013-0684 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: John Berry Telephone #: (760) 438-2963 (JA.JA i(—AtSL.) Date contacted: . I P (by: 1:A)(.) Fax #: (760) 438-2963 Mail c.—Telephone Far—' In Person U REMARKS: By: Sergio Azuela Enclosures: Esgil Corporation El GA 0MB LJEJ [I PC 7/3 trnsmtLdot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad 02-2379 July 14, 2003 RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 2121 Placido Ct. DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 7/3 REVIEWED BY: Sergio Azuela FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): PLAN CHECK NO.: 02-2379 SET: I (REV 3) DATE RECHECK COMPLETED: July 14, 2003 This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints to: ESGIL CORPORATION. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews. The original correction number has been given for your reference. In case you did not keep a copy of the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding corrections. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? DYes UNo a. • Carlsbad 02-2379 July 14, 2003. 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 2. Provide a complete list of all proposed plan changes, including: A brief description of each proposed plan change. The sheet or sheets of plans that shall be modified for each proposed plan change. The identification symbol and number used to identify the proposed plan change on the plans. 3. Please note that the Masonry Fireplace Standards Drawing and Specifications provided are not applicable for the cases presented on the original plans, since the fireplaces shown on the plans are stacked. Provide sizing calculations per UBC Chapter 31, figure 31-1, for the masonry flue sizing. Additionally, justify the manufacture red chimney extensions sizing and detail the size and shape connection between the masonry and manufacture red chimneys onto the plans. (All fireplaces) If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Sergio Azüela at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. EsGil Corporation In (Partnership with government for(Building Safety DATE: June 16, 2003. U APP CANT JURIS. JURISDICTION: Carlsbad U PLAN REVIEWER U FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 02-2379 (PR- 03-11) SET: I (REV) PROJECT ADDRESS: 2121 Placido Ct. PROJECT NAME: Welshons Add. - SFD - Proposed plan changes 0 The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. Tj The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. E1111 The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. El The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: John S. Beery Architect P.O. Box 130684, Carlsbad, CA 92013-0684 El Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: John Beery(S°i-) Telephone #: (760) 438-2963 Date contacted:-/4'.3 (by: A& ) Fax #: (7)/Z9t Mail Telephone Fax v In Person El REMARKS: By: Sergio Azuela Enclosures: Esgil Corporation OGA El MB DEJ DPC 6/9 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax(858)560-1576 Carlsbad 02-2379 June 16, 2003 GENERAL PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 2121 Placido Ct. DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 6/9 REVIEWED BY: Sergio Azuela PLAN CHECK NO.: 02-2379 DATE REVIEW COMPLETED: June 16, 2003 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are boated on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? C3 Yes 13 No -.4 S Carlsbad 02-2379 June 16, 2003. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Cbrporation is complete. 2. Provide a complete list of all proposed plan changes, including: A brief description of each proposed plan change. The sheet or sheets of plans that shall be modified for each proposed plan change. The identification symbol and number used to identify the proposed plan change on the plans. 3. Please note that the Masonry Fireplace Standards Drawing and Specifications provided are not applicable for the cases presented on the original plans, since the fireplaces shown on the plans are stacked. 4. Please note that all proposed plan changes (beam changes) included within the building permit applications, are identical in both sets of plans provided (the new and, the approved sets) therefore no plan change is applicable. The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgit Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Sergio Azuela at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. J 4 S Carlsbad 02-2379 June 16, 2003. VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 02-2379 PREPARED BY: Sergio Azuelä BUILDING ADDRESS: 2121 Placido Ct. BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R-3 & U-i DATE: June 16, 2003 SFD Add. Weishons Residence PCH TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V-N BUILDING PORTION AREA (Sq. Ft.) Valuation Multiplier Reg. Mod. VALUE ($) Time Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE Jurisdiction Code Icb IBY Ordinance I 1994 UBC Building Permit Fee 1994 UBC Plan Check Fee Type of Review: 0 Complete Review Structural Only Repetitive Fee LI Other fl [-:IEEI Repeats Hourly 1 21 Hours * Esgil Plan Review Fee * Based on hourly rate Comments: I $240.001 I $192.00] Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue.doc JN: 0502-4110 En&neerina Consultants CIVIL STRUCTURAL PLANNING • CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT &x)O Central Ave, Suite F (909) 245-2578 Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Fax (909) 245-2453 PROJECT: Structural design on WELSHONS residence addition. LOCATION: 2121 Placido Court, Carlsbad, CA 92009 OWNER: Kim Welshon CLIENT: JOHN S. BEERY ARCHITECT P.O. BOX 130684 CARLSBAD, CA 92013-0684 REVISIONS: S'JT2 3&7, 3'C, SD, 5P21 q. &L, 5- ci -- 'R A.L. 16 4- 'S ¶.'IT 14, 36 C. &L * DESIGNED BY: AL. CHECKED BY: c.L. ::1 ._,.. A. mom cingifleering Consultints CIVIL-STRUCTURAL PtANNINO: CCNSTRUCHCN MRNAGEM€NT SHEET: 36 DATE: 6-24-02 JN: 0502-4110, WALL @ ENTRY ATRIUM ( 16•11\ I 7.ft I I I2•ft' Sload(345Plf)lI__) +(l36pIf)---) 2 I I30.ft! S load S := °s =547p1f DL :=(20.psf.).(2) L :2.67•ft L =2.6711 S load = 1460 lb UPLIFT : (u s8) - DL(.85) UPLIFT =4250 lb USE STRONG WALL ANCHOR USE W/ A35_SPACING48ln O.C. WALL @ BEDROOM 3 L:7•ft 26 L=7 'ti S load :(346Plf)H)( 4.4 2.2 _) 51oad -6228 lb S load 1.33ft 7 L = 890 plf DL: 12•psf 2 UPLIFT : (u5. 10.ft) - DL•(.85) UPLIFT = 8873 lb USE HDI OA W/ SIMPSON EPDXY TIE (SET, 15" MIN. EMBED.) TO (E) 15" x 18" GRADE BM. GRADE UM. UIbI(.N I:=-- — U PLIFT --- 1= 1811 (145pc1)(l.25ft)(2.11)i- 14.psf.(10-ft) M :'Lh17TI M = 19586 -lb-ft 8 M. 12.1 ____--------- S (20000 psi) (.89)( 15. in) A50.9 -in 2 A - 0 USE/13\ B/S 181 W/ A35_SPACING=81n O.C. 5/8"AB_SPACING =Sln O.C. PLANNING/ENGINEERING APPROVALS pc2 -(a_ - PERMIT NUMBERCB £2 2 -237 '1 DATE 7jç- J ADDRESS a ( a! RESIDENTIM TENANT IMPROVEMENT RESIDENTIAL ADDITION MINOR PLAZA CAMINO REAL - (<$101,000.00) CARLSBAD COMPANY STORES VILLAGE FAIRE COMPLETE OFFICE BUILDING OTHER P4, CJ3 12, c 'wv :.l PLANNER ENGINEER --DATE— DATE' 130JMi5rOrmS/PIaflfliflg Engineering Approvals PCR03132 2121 PLACIDO CT CBAD WELSHONS RES-REVISE FIREPLACE PCR Lot#: JOHN BEERY — 7 g7/ tUI*-ik /o&'r T,'f(5 JLT k-c-- C-Yittf 11:7:5 0 Y 17 1Øn 2'4 I k-it.,3 pCcL- 7/6!43 i-1— 7Afo3 1? ph* (7 k ( Li 4i APfroLD 7~ ( 63 /q /c5 •'j ii--j (1tô cb1 P-cp, c-i- AP OLAIt ,Oc% 7( ((3 BUILDING ____________ BUILDING I 'I PLANNING I - j 7far.1 ENGINEERING - FIRE APPR/FORM HEALTH DEPT HAZ MAT I AIR QUAIL OTHER SEWER DISTR BLDG GRADING LETTER TO FROM APPLICANT APPLICANT PLAN CORR I ENGCORR I SCHOOL FORM CFD FORM 4 P E & M WORKSHEET BLDG FFES COMPLE jocimt- 4/e4