Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2175 CAMINO VIDA ROBLE; ; CB004822; Permit
06/05/2001 City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 Commercial/Industrial Permit Permit No: CB004822 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 Job Address: Permit Type: Parcel No: Valuation: Occupancy Group: Project Title: 03/22/2001 Applicant: RICK LIEN 2175 CAMINO VIDA ROBLE CBAD Tl Sub Type: Lot #: $9,897.00 Construction Type: Reference #: PAC BELL OFFICES-CONCRETE INDUST 0 NEW DEMO TRAILERS & NEWVAULT COVER Owner: Status: Applied: Entered By: Issued: Inspect Area: ISSUED 12/20/2000 RMA Plan Approved: 06/05/2001 619339-7425 1212 06/05/01 0002 01 02 345*49 Total Fees: $445.49 Total Payments To Date: $100.00 Balance Due: $345.49 Building Permit Add'l Building Permit Fee Plan Check Add'l Plan Check Fee Plan Check Discount Strong Motion Fee Park Fee LFM Fee Bridge Fee BTD #2 Fee BTD #3 Fee Renewal Fee Add'l Renewal Fee Other Building Fee Pot. Water Con. Fee Meter Size Add'l Pot. Water Con. Fee Reel. Water Con. Fee $113.58 $0.00 $73.83 $147.00 $0.00 $2.08 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $109.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Meter Size Add'l Reel. Water Con. Fee Meter Fee SDCWA Fee CFD Payoff Fee PFF PFF (CFD Fund) License Jay. License Tax (CFD Fund) Traffic Impact Fee Traffic Impact (CFD Fund) PLUMBING TOTAL ELECTRICAL TOTAL MECHANICAL TOTAL Master Drainage Fee: Sewer Fee: Redev Parking Fee: Additional Fees: TOTAL PERMIT FEES $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $445.49 NOTICE: Please take NOTICE trial approval of your project Includes the "Imposition' of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as "fees/exactions.1 You have 90 days from the date this permit was Issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020{a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capactiy changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of [imitations has previously otherwise expired, PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008 lliliiiPlliBmitrKw, _ FOR OFFICE USE O PLAN CHECK NO. EST. VAL. Plan Ck. Deposit Validated By_ Date p&LL. Address (include Bldg/Suite #)Business Name (at this address) Lot No.Subdivision Name/Number Unit No.Phase No.Total # of units Assessor's Parcel #Existing Use Proposed Use Description of Work SQ. FT.Wof Stories # of Bedrooms # of Bathrooms Name Address City ^^ji^^^-^c&tm^^ yfV<l/<c s£tys*j fU j0^J9i?:!:':C3>-Xl^wrt:for:Owrier;L'•••':: k" ':' PocJ/vx &- 9^?7/ ,, State/Zip _ _ Telephone # Fax # """ "' "* ,<jl ' ;'V7J Name Address City State/Zip Telephone # 3842 7** JU/ST .5, ft Name Address City State/Zip Telephone # (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law [Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code! or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 703X.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a^ivil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars [S500)). &JT>MlA C£>feT HSCe/Z. TEACE ^T Name State License # / ."2^7 ~J Address License Class A City State/Zip City Business License # Telephone # Designer Name State License # Address City State/Zip Telephone Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: rj I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. ^SC I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is ssued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Insurance Company (^&&&&4< L. ^t^CCM _ Policy No.^&^gCDPtfS^ Expiration Date & -Q ( ' (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS [$100] OR LESS) Q CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers'jEompensation Laws of California. WARNING: Failure tp secure workers' campeitsation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars/wlO.OOO), in addWlwf to t|n cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees. . _ DATE l2£7— O£j~Ol ^:^^'^^ vw?1. $'•&. ;.- ~ ••'•.- • ••: ' ". - ;•/ ;:'-'Y:. '.--*.• .• =:••• - -.•• I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractors License Law for the following reason: Q I, as owner of the property or my emplovees*with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). Q I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thareon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). f_3 t am exempt under Section _ Business and Professions Code for this reason: 1 . I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. O YES ONO 2. I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. 3. I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): 4. I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): _ 5. I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type of work): _ PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE DATE NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? Q YES D NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? l~1 YES Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? d YES n NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097(i) Civil Code). LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the CitV of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at anytime after the work is commenced foafe periocLaPtSO days (Section 106.4.4 Uniform Building Code). / APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE WHITE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance City of Carlsbad Final Building Inspection Dept: Building Engineering Planning CMWD StLite Fire Plan Check #: Date: 10/22/2001 Permit*: CB004822 Permit Type: Tl Project Name: PAC BELL OFFICES-CONCRETE Sub Type: INDUST DEMO TRAILERS & NEWVAULT COVER Address: 2175 CAMINO VIDA ROBLE Lot: 0 Contact Person: KIM Phone: 6198981976 Sewer Dist: Water Dist: Inspected Bv: Inspected Bv: Inspected Bv: i Comments: Date Inspected: Date Inspected: Date Inspected: £££'" ""j ""£ /£t& xJxk^^r' ^%^ Approved: Approved: Approved: J &S00J9. A Disapproved: Disapproved: Disapproved: nrLnf C * f ^^ Jr J*£/*A City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 07/24/2002 Permit# CB004822 Title: PAC BELL OFFICES-CONCRETE Description: DEMO TRAILERS & NEWVAULT COVER Inspector Assignment: PS Type: Tl Job Address: Suite: Location: APPLICANT RICK LIEN Owner: Remarks: Sub Type: INDUST 2175 CAMINOVIDAROBLE Lot 0 Phone: 6192520543 Inspector: V Total Time: CD Description 19 Final Structural 29 Final Plumbing 39 Final Electrical 49 Final Mechanical Requested By: KEN Entered By: KAREN Act - Comments Associated PCRs/CVs Inspection History Date Description 07/10/2002 89 Final Combo 10/22/2001 89 Final Combo 10/02/2001 13 Shear Panels/HD's 10/02/2001 15 Roof/Reroof 09/28/2001 15 Roof/Reroof 08/14/2001 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 08/13/2001 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers Act Insp Comments CO PS need deputy inspector final letter. PA GG FROM GRID (1) TO GRID (9) ONLY WC PY AP PY ROOF FINAL AP GG OK TO COVER AP GG NR GG NEED GATE CODE City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 08/14/2001 Permit# CB004822 Title: PAC BELL OFFICES-CONCRETE Description: DEMO TRAILERS & NEWVAULT COVER Sub Type: INDUST 2175 CAMINOVIDAROBLE Lot 0 Type: Tl Job Address: Suite: Location: APPLICANT RICK LIEN Owner: Remarks: THIS INSP MAY BE DONE ON MONDAY Inspector Assignment: GG Phone: 6195292841 Inspector: Total Time: CD Description 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers Act Comments Requested By: STEVE Entered By: CHRISTINE Associated PCRs Inspection History Date Description Act Insp Comments TestingEngineers-San Diego,Inc. Established 1946 Robert Royce August 27, 2001 Allied Design Group TESD Job No. 2001-1484 C/o Joseph Wong Design Group 23 59 4th Avenue, Suite 300 San Diego, CA 92101-1606 Job Name: CARLSBAD 12 PHASE 1 Address: 2175 Camino Vida Robles Carlsbad, California Building Permit No: Plan File No. The following pages present TESD's field inspection reports for the above referenced project for work performed through 08/15/01. These reports cover the locations of work inspected in accordance with generally accepted standards and do not constitute engineering opinions or project control. It is the responsibility of the contractor to schedule retests or reinspections of any areas that do not meet project specifications. TESD neither controls nor supervises the work at the site. We are not responsible for errors and omissions of the contractor, nor for the contractor's failure to keep the work on schedule or carry it out in accordance with the project plans, specifications and all applicable codes. We appreciate the opportunity to provide services on this project. Should you have any questions regarding the accompanying information, please contact our office at (858) 715-5800. Respectfully submitted, Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc. Gregory J. Smith Vice President of Inspection cc: City of Carlsbad -Accounts Payable Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc., 7895 Convoy Court, Suite 18 San Diego, CA, 92111 [858] 715-5800 Fax [858] 715-5810 Testing Engineers * San Diego, Inc. Established 1946 0 F 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 Tel. (858)715-5800 Fax. (858)715-5810 Page 1 of. Date: Field Report D Notice to Comply Job Name: Address: _^_ Job No. _£ v fr General/Subcontractor: ^y £? C^r^f ( ~___ .SoilType of Service Performed: structural steel _ Engineering Observation Inspection Check List: Soils Report Plans Concrete Fireproof ing Prestress Concrete Waterproofing Other Masonry Roofing Specs,RFl Codes Permit*:Plan File #: Material Description: Sample Type:H-lestsests Performed (see attached) CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: All of the observed work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. For any non-conforming items the contractor shall schedule TESD for reinspection or retesting. Start Stop Reg. Mrs.OT Mrs. Note: All inspections are based on 4 and 8 hour minlmums. In addition, any inspection extending past 12:00 p.m. (noon) will be billed an 8 hour minimum. Inspector's Signature/Name Approval Stghature/Name/Company (Veritication of 6n-sfte Hours ONLY) Form#003-A Testing Engineers-San Diego, Inc. Established 1946 Robert Royce September 11,2001 Allied Design Group TESD Job No. 2001-1484 C/o Joseph Wong Design Group 2359 4th Avenue, Suite 300 San Diego, CA 92101-1606 Job Name: CARLSBAD 12 PHASE 1 Address: 2175 Camino VidaRobles Carlsbad, California Building Permit No: CB004822 Plan File No. The following pages present TESD's field inspection reports for the above referenced project for work performed through 08/13/01 . These reports cover the locations of work inspected in accordance with generally accepted standards and do not constitute engineering opinions or project control. It is the responsibility of the contractor to schedule retests or reinspections of any areas that do not meet project specifications. TESD neither controls nor supervises the work at the site. We are not responsible for errors and omissions of the contractor, nor for the contractor's failure to keep the work on schedule or carry it out in accordance with the project plans, specifications and all applicable codes. We appreciate the opportunity to provide services on this project. Should you have any questions regarding the accompanying information, please contact our office at (858) 715-5800. Respectfully submitted, Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc. Gregory J. Smith Vice President of Inspection cc: City of Carlsbad - Accounts Payable Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc., 7895 Convoy Court, Suite 18 San Diego, CA. 92111 [858] 715-5800 Fax [858] 715-5810 Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc. Established 1946 7895 Convoy Ct, Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 Tel. (858)715-5800 Fax. (858)715-5810 Page 1 of Date: D Field Report Notice to Comply Job Name: ^c , A Address: Job No. G eneral/S u bcontractor:IS Type of Service Performed: Inspection Check List: Perm it #: _Soil Concrete _ Structural Steel Fireproofing _ Engineering Observation Soils Report >^Pians Plan File #: Prestress Concrete Waterproofing Other if^ Masonry Roofing RFI Codes Material Description: Sample Type:D Tests Performed (see attached) &j£J I CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: All of the observed work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. For any non-conforming items the contractor shall schedule TESD for reinspection or retesting. Start 7 -' Stop Reg. Mrs.OT Hrs. Note: All inspections are based on 4 and 8 hour minimums. In addition, any Inspection extending past 12:00 p.m. (noon) will be billed an 8 hour minimum. Inspector's Signature/Name /Igfj^J JL.& /JT/AS^ ^^*~r9 / ^r>^^>a^-r> Cert. No. Approval Signature/Name/Company (Verification of on-site Hours ONLY) Form#003-A Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc. Established 1946 7895 Convoy a., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 Tel, (858) 715-5800 Fax. (858)715-5810 Page 1 of „Date: D Field Report Notice to Comply Job Name: Address: Job No. to.-S 6* General/Subcontractor: Type of Service Performed: Inspection Check List: Permit #: Soil Structural Steel Fireproofing _ Engineering Observation Soils Report *-~-"Pians Plan File #: Prestress Concrete Waterproofing Other Masonry Roofing Specs.RFI Codes Material Description: Sample Type:D Tests Performed (see attached) c •fyS'* £S 7/J 4T ? *J CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: All of the observed work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. For any non-conforming items the contractor shall schedule TESD for reinspection or retesting. Start Stop Reg. Mrs.OT Mrs. Note: All inspections are based on 4 and 8 hour minimums. In addition, any inspection extending past 12:00 p.m. (noon) will be billed an 8 hour minimum. Inspector's Signature/Name Xpy ^/ &'sjj jf ^ ^L^f^i \ -\ Cert. No. Approval Signatu re/Name/Company (Verification of on-site Hours ONLY) Form#003-A Testing Engineers-San Diego, Inc.Established 1946 RECEIVED FINAL REPORT FOR ... 1 , onpo SPECIAL INSPECTION AND MATERIAL TESTING^1 1D DATE: 7/11/02 ENGINEERING Job No. 2001-1484 TO: City of Carlsbad Building Department 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008 SUBJECT: SATISFACTORY COMPLETION OF WORK REQUIRING SPECIAL INSPECTION AND MATERIAL TESTING PERMIT NO.: CB004822 PROJECT ADDRESS: Pacific Bell Carlsbad 12 Phase 1 2175 Camino Vida Robles Carlsbad, California I declare under penalty of perjury that, to the best of my knowledge, the work requiring special inspection, material sampling and testing, including the off-site fabrication of building components for the structure/s constructed under the subject permits is in conformance with the approved plans, the inspection and observation program and other construction documents, and the applicable workmanship provisions of the Uniform Building Code. Executed on 7/11/02. The work which we provided Special Inspection consisted of: Reinforced Concrete, Reinforced Masonry and Dowel/Bolt Epoxy Anchorage. A. If the inspection services were provided by an approved material testing laboratory or special inspection agency: TESTING LABORATORY OR SPECIAL INSPECTION AGENCY: Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc. ADDRESS: 7895 Convoy Court, Suite 18, San Diego, CA 92111 RESPONSIBLE MANAGING ENGINEER OF THE TESTING LABORAJQRY OR SPECIAL^NSPECTION AGENCY: NAME (PRINT OR TYPE) Larry Clark .Expiration Date:State of California Registration Number: C26151 B. If the inspection services were provided by an independent certified special inspector: SPECIAL INSPECTOR'S NAME (PRINT OR TYPE): 9/30/05 EXPIRATION DATE:REGISTRATION NUMBER: SIGNATURE: Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc.. 7895 Convoy Court, Suite 1 8 SanDiego,CA.921M [858]715-5800Fax[858]715-5810 Testing Engineers-San Diego, Inc. Project Name REPORT OF COMPRESSION TEST Pacific Bell Carlsbad 12 Phase 1 Sample Group # 19018 Project No 2001-1484 Project Address 2175 Camino Vida Robles Gen. Contractor N/A Engineer N/A Bldg Permit No Need info Sub-Contractor N/A Architect N/A Plan File No Need info Gov't Contract # N/A DSA/OSHPD DSA#N/A Sample Group Data Report of Placement Date Supplier/Plant Mix Number Mix Description Mix Design Specified Strength Truck No. Sample Mark: Admixture Mortar 9/19/01 JOB MIX N/A TYPE S MORTAR 1800 psi 1800 psi Ticket #: Load Cylinders Slump Air Temp Mix Temp Air Content 12.4 MPa Unit Weight 12.4 MPa # Time Batched Delivered by DC Date Rec'd in Gallons of water added at Measured (in.) N/A (°F) N/A (°F) N/A (%) N/A #Error 0 Time Sampled Specified N/A N/A N/A N/A Age: N/A Min. Lab: Logged in by: N/A by Specific Location Special Instructions/Remarks Compression Laboratory Data Sample Age 15 28 28 56 Lab No. 66970 66971 66972 66973 Comments: 28 Date Discard Dimensions Tested 10/4/01 D 2x4in 10/17/01 10/17/01 11/14/01 D 2x4 in D 2x4 in 0 2x4 in Test Area Max Load Com pressi ve Strength 3.14inz 17,970 Ibs 5720psi 39.4MPa 3.14in2 19,350 IDS 6160psi 42.4MPa 3.14in2 19,570 Ibs 6230psi 42.9MPa 3. 14 in2 Ibs psi MPa day test meets specifications. Sampling and testing conducted in accordance with ASTM Standard designations: C31-91, C39-86, C78i64, C617-87, C42-90 Checked by: Date: Reviewed by: ( A^\^^ Carlos Acero cc:Allied Design Group c/o Staff Engineer City of Carlsbad Testing Engineers-San Diego, Inc. REPORT OF COMPRESSION TEST Pacific Bell Carlsbad 12 Phase 1 N/A Project Name Project Address 2175 Camino Vida Robles Gen. Contractor Engineer Bldg Permit No Need info Gov't Contract # N/A Sample Group # 19019 Project No 2001-1484 Sub-Contractor N/A N/A Architect N/A Plan File No Need info DSA/OSHPD DSA#N/A Sample Group Data Report of Placement Date Supplier/Plant Mix Number Mix Description Mix Design Specified Strength Truck No. Sample Mark: Admixture Grout 9/19/01 JOB MIX N/A 1 CMT/2 2000 2000 Ticket #: Prisms Slump Air Temp Mix Temp SND/2 GRVL Air Content psi 13.8 MPa Unit Weight psi 13.8 MPa Load # Time Batched Measured (in.) N/A (°F) N/A (°F) N/A (%} N/A #Error 0 Time Sampled Specified N/A N/A N/A N/A Age: N/A Min. Delivered by DC Date Rec'd in Lab: Logged In by: N/A Gallons of water added at by Specific Location Special Instructions/Remarks Compression Laboratory Data Sample Age 15 28 28 56 Lab No. 66974 66975 66976 66977 Comments: 28 Date Discard Tested 10/4/01 10/17/01 10/17/01 11/14/01 D D a 0 Dimensions 3, 3, 2. ,06X3, .10X3 ,60X3. .22 in .OOin ,02in in Test Area 9.85 ina 9.30 in2 7.85 in2 in2 Max Load Compressive Strength 37,120 ibs 3770psi 35,850 ibs 3850 psi 29,920 Ibs 3810 psi Ibs psi 26.0 MPa 26.5 MPa 26. 3 MPa MPa day test meets specifications. Sampling and testing conducted in accordance with ASTM Standard designations: C31-91, C39-86, C78-8ffC6T?-87, C42-90 Checked by: Date: Reviewed by:Date; Carlos Acero cc:Allied Design Group c/o Staff Engineer City of Carlsbad Testing Engineers-San Diego, Inc. REPORT OF COMPRESSION TEST Pacific Bell Carlsbad 12 Phase 1Project Name _____ Project Address 2175 Camino Vida Robles Gen. Contractor N/A Engineer N/A Bldg Permit No Need info Sample Group # 19216 Project No 2001-1484 Sub-Contractor N/A Architect N/A Plan File No Need info Gov't Contract # N/A DSA/OSHPD DSA#N/A Sample Group Data Report of Placement Date Supplier/Plant Mix Number Mix Description Mix Design Specified Strength Mortar Cylinders 9/18/01 JOB MIX N/A TYPE S MORTAR 1800 psi 12.4 MPa 1800 psi 12.4 MPa Slump Air Temp Mix Temp Air Content Unit Weight Measured (in.) N/A (°F) 76 (°F) 73 (%) N/A #Error 0 Specified N/A N/A N/A N/A Truck No. Sample Mark: JEh Admixture Ticket #:Load* Time Batched 12:30PM Time Sampled 1:OOPM Age: N/A Min. Delivered by _Jsl/A__ Date Rec'd in Lab: Logged In by: N/A Gallons of water added at by Specific Location DOORWAY IN FILL 2 ON A2 Special Instructions/Remarks Compression Laboratory Data Sample Age 7 28 28 56 Lab No. Date Discard Dimensions Tested 66245 9/25/01 D 2x4in 66246 10/16/01 D 2x4in 66247 10/16/01 D 2x4in 66248 11/13/01 0 2x4in Test Area Max Load Com press ive Strength 3.14in2 18,390 Ibs 5860psi 40.4MPa 3.14ina 21,970 Ibs 7000psi 48.2MPa 3.14ina 21,730 Ibs 6920psi 47JMPa 3. 14 in1 Ibs psi MPa Comments: 28 day test meets specifications. Sampling and testing conducted in accordance with ASTM Standard designations: C31-91, C39-86, C78-8A, C6Y7-87, C42-QO Checked by: Date: Reviewed by: I A"-\—-. Carlos Acero Staff Engineer cc:Allied Design Group c/o City of Carlsbad Testing Engineers-San Diego, Inc. REPORT OF COMPRESSION TEST Project Name Pacific Bell Carlsbad 12 Phase 1 Sample Group # 19217 Project No 2001-1484 Project Address 2175 Camino Vida Robles Gen. Contractor JWA Engineer N/A Bldg Permit No Need info Sub-Contractor N/A Architect _N/A Plan File No Need info Gov't Contract # N/A DSA/OSHPD DSA#N/A Sample Group Data Report of Placement Date Supplier/Plant Mix Number Mix Description Mix Design Specified Strength Truck No. Sample Mark: JB1 Admixture Grout 9/18/01 JOB MIX N/A Prisms Slump Air Temp Mix Temp 1 CMT/2 SND/2 GRVL Air Content 2000 2000 Ticket #: psi 13.8 MPa Unit Weight psi 13.8 MPa Load # Time Batched 1 :00 PM Delivered by N/A Date Rec'd in Gallons of water added at Measured Specified (in.) 9.50 N/A (°F) 74 N/A (°F) 70 (%} N/A #Error 0 Time Sampled 1 Lab: by N/A N/A :20 PM Age: N/A Win. Logged in by: N/A Specific Location DOORWAY IN FIL W A2 Special Instructions/Remarks Compression Laboratory Data Sample Age 7 28 28 56 Lab No. 66249 66250 66251 66252 Date Discard Dimensions Tested 9/25/01 D 2.84X3.06in 10/16/01 D 3.10X3.06in 10/16/01 D 3.12X3.06in 11/13/01 0 in Test Area Max Load Com press! ve Strength 8.69 in1 29,080 Ibs 3350 psi 23.1 MPa 9.49 in2 42,040 Ibs 4430 psi 9. 55 in8 41,150 Ibs 4310 psi in2 Ibs psi 30. 5 MPa 29.7 MPa MPa Comments: 28 day test meets specifications. Sampling and testing conducted in accordance with ASTM Standard designations: C31-91, C39-86, C7&84, CCT7-87, C42-90 Date: Reviewed by: V yV^v^ Carlos Acero Checked by: cc:Allied Design Group c/o Staff Engineer City of Carlsbad Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc. Established 1946 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 Tel. (858) 715-5800 Page 1 of San Diego, CA92111 Field Report Fax. (858) 715-5810 „ ± -/>Date: OO D Notice to Comply Job Name: Address: * job NO. General/Subcontractor: Soil CAr Type of Service Performed: ___ structural steel _ Engineering Observation Inspection Check List: Soils Report X" Plans Concrete Fireproof ing Specs. Prestress Concrete ^( Masonry Waterproofing r Roofing Other £gjfflCu H^)y1<o\ RFI V Codes Permit #:Plan File #: QO-?)$ Material Description: T £MU - UflCUfl Sample Type:D Tests Performed (see attached) CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: All of the observed work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. For any non-conforming items the contractor shall schedule TESD for reinspection or retesting. StarT Stop Reg. Mrs.OT Hrs. Note: All inspections are based on 4 and 8 hour minimums. In addition, any inspection extendingpagt ^^QQ p.m. (noon) will be billed an 8 hour minimum. vx-"*_—/4—•It—"V"^nInspector's Signature/NamaJ^g£JM^A»V^ \-^\e.T7 / ^~X—^a-^ > ^^ 1 Cert. No. Approval Signature/Name/Company^ (Verification of on-site Hours ONLY) Form#003-A EsGil Corporation In Partnership with government for 'Buikting Safety DATE: 1/25/01 Q APELICANT JURISDICTION: Carlsbad a PLAN REVIEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-4822 SET: II PROJECT ADDRESS: 2175 Camino Vida Roble PROJECT NAME: Pacific Bell Addition The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: ) I Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person it^sC^ REMARKS: City to approve the special inspecjjonprogram. By: David Yao Enclosures: Esgil Corporationn GA n MB n EJ n PC 1/18 tmsmti.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 * (858)560-1468 4 Fax (858) 560-1576 EsGil Corporation In Partnership Witfc government for 'Buitding Safety DATE: 3/21/01 Q APPLICANT JURISDICTION: Carlsbad a PEAITREVIEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-4822 rev SET: I PROJECT ADDRESS: 2175 Camino Vida Roble PROJECT NAME: Pacific Bell Remodel & Addition Phase I The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person -^ fy , REMARKS: 1. City to approve the special inspection^rogramT2. PCR number is not provided. By: David Yao Enclosures: Esgi! Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC 3/13 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858)560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-4822 rev PREPARED BY: David Yao DATE: 3/21/01 BUILDING ADDRESS: 2175 Camino Vida Roble BUILDING OCCUPANCY:TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION; BUILDING PORTION demo and vault cover Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE Jurisdiction Code AREA ( Sq. Ft.) cb Valuation Multiplier By Ordinance Bldg. Permit Fee by Ordinance w Reg. Mod. VALUE ($) Plan Check Fee by Ordinance $108.94 Type of Review: Repetitive Fee Repeats D Complete Review D Other r/1 Hourly Structural Only Hour(s) * Esgil Plan Review Fee $87.15 Based on hourly rate Comments: Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue.doc EsGil Corporation In Partners/tip zt/it/t government for <Buitting Safety DATE: 1/4/01 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad O~PLAN REVIEWER Q FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-4822 SET: I PROJECT ADDRESS: 2175 Camino Vida Roble PROJECT NAME: Pacific Bell Addition The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. XI The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Rick Lien P.O.Box 930 Poway CA 92074 * ,- Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Rick Lien*^" Telephone #: (619)339-7425 Date contacted: lA-( (by:T5>) Fax #: £i^g. M.€*^> Mail Telephone«•— Fax-— In Person REMARKS: By: David Yao Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA n MB D EJ D pc 12/21 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858)560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad 00-4822 1/4/01 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST COMMERCIAL PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-4822 OCCUPANCY: B TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: ? ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA: ? SPRINKLERS?: ? REMARKS: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED: 1/4/01 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad USE: telephone exchange ACTUAL AREA: ? STORIES: ? HEIGHT: OCCUPANT LOAD: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 12/21 PLAN REVIEWER: David Yao FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Code sections cited are based on the 1997 UBC. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. Carlsbad 00-4822 1/4/01 • GENERAL 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new complete sets of prints, to: Esgil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123, (858)560-1468. • PLANS 2. Provide a Building Code Data Legend on the Title Sheet. Include the following code information for each building proposed: * Occupancy Group 4 Type of Construction * Sprinklers: Yes or No * Floor Area 4 Justification to exceed allowable area in Table 5-B. (if applicable) * Justification to exceed allowable height or stories in Table 5-B. (if . ..applicable) 3. Provide a statement on the Title Sheet of the plans that this project shall comply with the 1998 edition of the California Building Code (Title 24), which adopts the 1997 UBC, UMC and UPC and the 1996 NEC. 4. When special inspection is required, the architect or engineer of record shall prepare an inspection program which shall be submitted to the building official for approval prior to issuance of the building permit. Please review Section 106.3.5. Please complete the attached form. • FOUNDATION 5. Provide a copy of the project soil report prepared by a California licensed architect or civil engineer. The report shall include foundation design recommendations based on the engineer's findings and shall comply with UBC Section 1804.(include the recommendation for the retaining wall) 6. In Seismic Zone 4, each site shall be assigned a near-source factor. Identify this value in the soils report and on the plans. Section 1629.4.2. 7. Specify on the foundation plan or structural specifications sheet the soil classification, the soils expansion index and the design bearing capacity of the foundation. Section 106.3.3. 8. Investigate the potential for seismically induced soil liquefaction and soil instability in seismic zones 3 and 4. Section 1804.5 Carlsbad 00-4822 1/4/01 9. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soil report are properly incorporated into the plans. (When required by the soil report). 10. The soils engineer recommended that he/she review the foundation excavations. Note on the foundation plan that "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building Department foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the building official in writing that: a) The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report, b) The utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and c) The foundation excavations comply with the intent of the soils report." 11. Provide calculations to justify the vault cover and retaining wall. Section 106.3.3. 12. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for .residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92009, (760) 438-1161. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. t ^ NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 13. To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. 14. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: a Yes Q No Carlsbad OO-4822 1/4/01 15. The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact David Yao at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. 00-4822 1/4/01 SPECIAL INSPECTION PROGRAM ADDRCS3 OR LEGAL DESCRIPTION: *j£3/?<5 /%V/A/fl PLAN CHECK NUMBER:^-l&^ OWNER'S NAME: I, as the owner, or agent of the owner (contractors may npj employ the special inspector), certify that I, or the a rchltectf engineer of record, will be responsible for employing the special inspectors) as required by Uniform Building Code (UBC) Section 1701.1 for the construction project located at the^fteTfst«d>abQve, UBC Section 108.3.5. yV sCvSigned //^&/^^ /I i, as the engineer/architect of record, certify that t have prepared the following special inspection program as required by UBC Section 106.3,5 'or the construction project located at the site listed above, Signed Welding High Strength Bolting Expanclort/Epoxy Anchors Sprayod-On Ftraprooftng Other, 1. List of work requiring sped*! inspection: Soils Compliance Prior to Foundation Inspection Structural Concrete Over 2500 PSl Prestrtsscd Concrete Structural Masonry Designer Specified 2. Nam«(c) of tndtvldual(c) or flrm{t} reEponsiblc forth* specie! inspections listed above: A. 8. C. 3. Duties of the special inspectors for the work listed above: A. B, C, 4 ctrr / Sptc*aJ tntpsetat *fia:i ch«* h wtth th« City in<J prw«nt *h«ir cr«d»ntlala fer ftpproval pripr.to work ori the job site. iO'd T£:5T Carlsbad 00-4822 1/4/01 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PREPARED BY: David Yao BUILDING ADDRESS: 2175 Camino Vida Roble PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-4822 DATE: 1/4/01 BUILDING OCCUPANCY: B TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V-N? BUILDING PORTION vault cover retaining wall . Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE Jurisdiction Code AREA ( Sq. Ft.) 671 3000 cb Valuation Multiplier 14.75 14.75 By Ordinance Bldg. Permit Fee by Ordinance ^ Reg. Mod. VALUE ($) 1 » , 9,897 44,250 54,147 $424.20 Plan Check Fee by Ordinance Type of Review: CH Repetitive Fee Repeats Complete Review D Other D Hourly Structural Only Hour(s) * Esgil Plan Review Fee $275.73 $220.58 Comments: Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue.doc BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST DATE:Of BUILDING //DDRfesS: jLl^S PLANCHECK NO.: iL PROJECT DESCRIPTION: f ex, ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER:EST. VALUE: _ ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL DENIAL The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submitted; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to build. A Right-of-Way permit is required prior to construction of the following improvements: Please see>, the^ attached report of deficiencies marked withfl^Make necessary corrections to plans or specification^ for compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. By: FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY ENGINEERING AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE BUILDING PERMIT: "• Date: IENTS Dedication Application Dedication Checklist Improvement Application Improvement Checklist Future Improvement Agreement Grading Permit Application Grading Submittal Checklist Right-of-Way Permit Application Right-of-Way Permit Submittal Checklist and Information Sheet Sewer Fee Information Sheet ENGINEERING DEPT. CONTACT PERSON Name: JOANNE JUCHNIEWICZ City of Carlsbad Address: 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008 Phone: (760) 602-2775 CFD INFORMATION Parcel Map No: Lots: Recordation: Carlsbad Tract: A-4 H:\WORO\DOCS\CHKL£TBuldino Ptartcheck Ckkt Fo<m (Generic).** BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1ST 2ND 3RD D D D 1 • Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: A. North Arrow F. Right-of-Way Width & Adjacent Streets B. Existing & Proposed Structures G. Driveway widths C. Existing Street Improvements H. Existing or proposed sewer lateral D. Property Lines I. Existing or proposed water service E. Easements J. Existing or proposed irrigation service D D D 2- Show on site plan: A. Drainage Patterns 1. Building pad surface drainage must maintain a minimum slope of one percent towards an adjoining street or an approved drainage course. 2. ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE: "Finish grade will provide a minimum positive drainage of 2% to swale 5' away from building." B. Existing & Proposed Slopes and Topography C. Size, type, location, alignment of existing or proposed sewer and water service (s) that serves the project. Each unit requires a separate service, however, second dwelling units and apartment complexes are an exception. D. Sewer and water laterals should not be located within proposed driveways, per standards. D D D 3- Include on title sheet: A. Site address B. Assessor's Parcel Number C. Legal Description For commercial/industrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, include: total building square footage with the square footage for each different use, existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing, warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved. EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION H:\VTORO\DOCS\CHKLS-nBuMlno Ptonchedt CWst Forni (Generic}.**; BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE 4a. Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of approval for Project No._ CH D d 4b. All conditions are in compliance. Date: D D D DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS 5. Dedication for ad street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the building site and any storm drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and for remodels with a value at or exceeding $15.000. pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.030. Dedication required as follows: Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8 %" x 11" plat map and submit with a title report. All easement documents must be approved and signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process. Submit the completed application form with the required checklist items and fees to the Engineering Department in person. Applications will not be accept by mail or fax. Dedication completed by:Date: a n n IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS 6a. All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the construction exceeds $75.000. pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.040. Public improvements required as follows: Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public improvement requirements. A registered Civil Engineer must prepare the appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements on the attached checklist to the Engineering Department through a separate plan check process. The completed application form and the requirements on the H:\WORD\DOCS\CHM_ST\BuBdinQ Planeheck CWst Form (RIDDLE - HARVEY 7-12-OOJ.00C BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 3rd checklist must be submitted in person. Applications by mail or fax are not accepted. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of building permit. Improvement Plans signed by: Date: 6b. Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title report or current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $280 so we may prepare the necessary Neighborhood Improvement Agreement. This agreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building permit. Neighborhood Improvement Agreement will include the following: D D 6c. Enclosed please find your Neighborhood Improvement Agreement. Please return agreement signed and notarized to the Engineering Department. Neighborhood Improvement Agreement completed by: Date: D D D 6d. No Public Improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or defective improvements found adjacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction of the City Inspector prior to occupancy. GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section 11.06.030 of the Municipal Code. D D D 7a- Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading requirements. Include accurate grading quantities (cut, fill import, export). D D D 7b- Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer must be submitted together with the completed application form attached. NOTE: The Grading Permit must be issued and rough grading approval obtained prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Grading Inspector sign off by: Date: D D 7c- Graded Pad Certification required. (Note: Pad certification may be required even if a grading permit is not required.) M:\WORD\DOCS\CHKLST\BulkHng Plancfteck Cklst Form (RIDDLE - HARVEY 7-12-OOJ.ttoc BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 4 ST OND 3RD D D D 7d .No Grading Permit required. [H D D 7e- If grading is not required, write "No Grading" on plot plan. MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS G n D 8. A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-Way and/or private work adjacent to the public Right-of-Way. Types of work include, but are not limited to: street improvements, tree trimming, driveway construction, tying into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities. Right-of-Way permit required for: ____^_ D D 9. INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT If your facility is located in the City of Carlsbad sewer service area, you need to contact the Carlsbad Municipal Water District, located at 5950 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008. District personnel can provide forms and assistance, and will check to see if your business enterprise is on the EWA Exempt List. You may telephone (760) 438-2722, extension 7153, for assistance. Industrial Waste permit accepted by: Date: D D D IO.NPDES PERMIT Complies with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant shall provide best management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever occurs first. D D D 11. Q Required fees are attached Q No fees required WATER METER REVIEW D D D 12a- Domestic (potable) Use Ensure that the meter proposed by the owner/developer is not oversized. Oversized meters are inaccurate during low-flow conditions. If it is oversized, for the life of the meter, the City will not accurately bill the owner for the water used. • All single family dwelling units received "standard" 1" service with 5/8" service. H:WTORD\[XX^\CHKLS™i«lnB Planch** Ckia Form (Generic)-** c Rw.T/MAo 1ST )ND iRD D D 12b. BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST • If owner/developer proposes a size other than the "standard", then owner/developer must provide potable water demand calculations, which include total fixture counts and maximum water demand in gallons per minute (gpm). A typical fixture count and water demand worksheet is attached. Once the gpm is provided, check against the "meter sizing schedule" to verify the anticipated meter size for the unit. • Maximum service and meter size is a 2" service with a 2" meter. • If a developer is proposing a meter greater than 2", suggest the installation of multiple 2" services as needed to provide the anticipated demand, (manifolds are considered on case by case basis to limit multiple trenching into the street). Irrigation Use (where recycled water is not available) All irrigation meters must be sized via irrigation calculations (in gpm) prior to approval. The developer must provide these calculations. Please follow these guidelines: 1. If the project is a newer development (newer than 1998), check the recent improvement plans and observe if the new irrigation service is reflected on the improvement sheets. If so, at the water meter station, the demand in gpm may be listed there. Irrigation services are listed with a circled "I", and potable water is typically a circled "W". The irrigation service should look like: STA 1+00 Install 2" service and 2. 1.5: meter (estimated 100 gpm) If the improvement plans do not list the irrigation meter and the service/meter will be installed via another instrument such as the building plans or grading plans (w/ a right of way permit of course), then the applicant must provide irrigation calculations for estimated worst-case irrigation demand (largest zone with the farthest reach). Typically, Larry Black has already reviewed this if landscape plans have been prepared, but the applicant must provide the calculations to you for your use. Once you have received a good example of irrigation calculations, keep a set for your reference. In general the calculations will include: • Hydraulic grade line • Elevation at point of connection (POC) • Pressure at POC in pounds per square inch (PSI) • Worse case zone (largest, farthest away from valve • Total Sprinkler heads listed (with gpm use per head) • Include a 10% residual pressure at point of connection 3. In general, all major sloped areas of a subdivision/project are to be irrigated via separate irrigation meters (unless the project is only SFD with no HOA). As long as the project is located within the City recycled water H:\WORnDOCS\CHKLST\BuftUng Pitncheck CWtt Form (Qenwlc) Joe 6 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST *ST 2ND 3RD service boundary, the City intends on switching these irrigation services/meters to a new recycled water line in the future. CH D IZ1 12c. Irrigation Use (where recycled water is available) 1. Recycled water meters are sized the same as the irrigation meter above. 2. If a project fronts a street with recycled water, then they should be connecting to this line to irrigate slopes within the development. For subdivisions, this should have been identified, and implemented on the improvement plans. Installing recycled water meters is a benefit for the applicant since they are exempt from paying the San Diego County Water Capacity fees. However, if they front a street which the recycled water is there, but is not live (sometimes they are charged with potable water until recycled water is available), then the applicant must pay the San Diego Water Capacity Charge. If within three years, the recycled water line is charged with recycled water by CMWD, then the applicant can apply for a refund to the San Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA) for a refund. However, let the applicant know that we cannot guarantee the refund, and they must deal with the SDCWA for this. D D D 13- Additional Comments: H:\WORD\DOCS\CHKLSTOulding Planch** Cktat Form (Gwwifc)xtoc I J it, .J PLANNING DEPARTMENT BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST Plan Check No. CB Planner APN: Address Van Lynch Phone (760) 602-4613 Type of Project & Use: Zoning: ^M /Net Project Density: Ajft DU/AC.. General Plan:Facilities Management Zone: CFD (in/out) Circle One —-Pate of participation:temaining net dev acres: {For non-residential development: Type of land used created by this permit: } Legend: /\ Item Complete Environmental Review Required: DATE OF COMPLETION: YES Item Incomplete - Needs your action C. NO TYPE Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: Discretionary Action Required: APPROVAL/RESO. NO. PROJECT NO. YES >C NO DATE ? TYPE OTHER RELATED CASES: Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: &&* f&iL. fiWfer f -*>&**o / Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance Project site located in Coastal Zone? YES CA Coastal Commission Authority? YES NO If California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact them at - California Coastal Commission San Diego District, 7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite 103, San Diego, CA 92108-4402, Phone: 619- 767-2370 Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt): Coastal Permit Determination Form already completed? YES NO If NO, complete Coastal Permit Determination Form now. Coastal Permit Determination Log #: Follow-Up Actions: 1) Stamp Building Plans as "Exempt" or "Coastal Permit Required" (at minimum Floor Plans). 2) Complete Coastal Permit Determination Log as needed. Inclusionary Housing Fee required: YES NO y (Effective date of Inclusionary Housing Ordinance - May 21, 1993.) Data Entry Completed? YES NO (A/P/Ds, Activity Maintenance, enter CB#, toolbar, Screens, Housing Fees, Construct Housing Y/N, Enter Fee, UPDATE!) Site Plan: 1. Provide a fully dimensional site plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way width, dimensional setbacks and existing topographical lines. 2. Provide legal description of property and assessor's parcel number. Zoning: ^»o ^ £ 1. Setbacks: ^'^' ^J^ Front: Required Interior Side: Required Street Side: Required Rear: Required V / X 2. Accessory structure setbacks: Front: Required , - Interior Side: Required f\J /, Street Side: Required //)- Rear: Required Structure separation: Required A 3. Lot Coverage: Requiredv-V N 4. Heiqht: Required y _j. 5. Parkinq: Spaces Required Guest Spaces Required 2 Additional Comments (jjflffltffy CuP j8/fl&£#L- ^~ \JAuLfta\Jffi oriuj o**f Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown "~~ APPwMt- £0/L frtiitso A^d / OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER Carlsbad Fire Department 004822 1635 Faraday Ave. Carlsbad, CA 92008 Plan Review Requirements Category: Date of Report: 02/09/2001 Fire Prevention (760) 602-4660 Building Plan Reviewed by: Name: Address: V ^ Rick Lien P O Box 930 City, State: Poway CA 92074 Plan Checker: Job Name: Job #: 004822 Bell Central Job Address: 2175 Camino Vida Roble Bldg #: CB004822 Ste. or Bldg. No. Approved The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and / or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes and standards. Please review carefully all comments attached as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. D Approved Subject to The item you have submitted for review has been approved subject to the attached conditions. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. Please resubmit to this office the necessary plans and / or specifications required to indicate compliance with applicable codes and standards. Incomplete The item you have submitted for review is incomplete. At this time, this office cannot adequately conduct a review to determine compliance with the applicable codes and / or standards. Please review carefully all comments attached. Please resubmit the necessary plans and / or specifications to this office for review and approval. Review FD Job # 1st 9nrj 3rd 004822 FDFile# Other Agency ID Carlsbad Fire Department 004822 1635 Faraday Ave. Carlsbad, CA 92008 Plan Review Requirements Category: Date of Report: 01/09/2001 Fire Prevention (760) 602-4660 Building Plan Reviewed by: Name: Address: Rick Lien P O Box 930 0 City, State: Poway CA 92074 Plan Checker: Job Name: Pac Bell Central Job #: 004822 Job Address: 2175 Camino Vida Roble Bldg #: CB004822 Ste. or Bldg. No. Approved The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and / or specifications provided in yoursubmittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes and standards. Please review carefully all comments attached as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. Approved The item you have submitted for review has been approved subject to the Subject to attached conditions. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. Please resubmit to this office the necessary plans and / or specifications required to indicate compliance with applicable codes and standards. Incomplete The item you have submitted for review is incomplete. At this time, this office cannot adequately conduct a review to determine compliance with the applicable codes and / or standards. Please review carefully all comments attached. Please resubmit the necessary plans and / or specifications to this office for review and approval. Review FD Job # 1st 2nd 3rd 004822 FD File # Other Aqencv ID Carlsbad Fire Department 003481 1625 Faraday Ave. Ca'rlsbad, CA 92008 Plan Review Requirements Category: Date of Report: 09/26/2000 Building Plan Reviewed by: Fire Prevention (760) 602-4660 _... JO OLJ^ ot^ Name: Address: City, State: Rick Lien Plan Checker: Job Name: Job #: 003481 Bell Office Job Address: 2175 Camino Vida Roble Bldg #: CB003481 Ste. orBldg. No. Approved The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and / or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes and standards. Please review carefully all comments attached as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. Approved The item you have submitted for review has been approved subject to the Subject to attached conditions. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. Please resubmit to this office the necessary plans and / or specifications required to indicate compliance with applicable codes and standards. Incomplete The item you have submitted for review is incomplete. At this time, this office cannot adequately conduct a review to determine compliance with the applicable codes and / or standards. Please review carefully all comments attached. Please resubmit the necessary plans and / or specifications to this office for review and approval. Review FDJob# 1st 2nd 3rd 003481 FDFile# Other Agency ID BUk'KU 1 K UlUNl-i tNb 1'ec IS ,'U.H.I '-t:.'il -. I'.U burkett A fir* BUKKtll K. UUNb LNb Dec Ib 20UU y:iy BURKETT & WONG *• Structural & Civil Engineers & Surveyors 3434 Fourth Avenue « San Diego. CA 82103-4911 Tel: (619) 299-6550 » Fax: (819) 299-9934 DATE - JULY 17. 2000 ENGINEER- MBB JOB NO. 6680Y STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS ": ron " r ~~- "" " PACIFIC BELL CENTHAl OFRCE ADOPTION 2175 CAMINO VIDA ROBLE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA ALLIED DESIGN GROUP 2359 FOURTH AVE. SAN DIEGO, CA o «• UUNb tNb Mx:bl92999934 Dec J5 2000 9U9 P.03 HA» fr/frr; ENOK. burtott tuiong*JO» NO. iT^. 0.4 Trr"" Jtfcel iCT '(•*u'**)/o - 30.4 4V-MO •*" < — * 14 "u? BUKKt|«l fc UJUNb hNb I- ax :bl 92999954 Dec 15*2000 9:20 P.CW _„ftb -Civ burtetttuiong —Mnicturaf A fc -4--* w*- '.j&f!:?^- rt'HI'i^^ffS 3M IX 3-01 * 34 ttJKICtll K UUNQ tNb Fax=6192999954 Dec 15 2000 P.03 OATf. CNGI. «o«ci burkett ftuiong ttudwtf t SHEET—. KM NO. L -- ls-»=.<4 • i-s" to (4 HURKtll & WJN5 EN6J Kax:bl92999954 Dec Ib 2000 9:20? P.Ob M. "1/0O ENGR A Among tuwoturol ft o SHEfT. < :;*-«"*•* HUKKtll & UUNb tNb hax:bl929999i4 Dec Ib CNCt burtott ftuiong •tmcnraf t KM NO. j? t&o |fr * , LAW Crandall . LAWGIBB Group Member m October 25, 2000 Mr. Hector Zuniga Allied Design Group - JWDA 2359 Fourth Avenue, Suite 300 San Diego, California 92101-1606 Subject: Preliminary Recommendations for Pavement Design Proposed Pacific Bell Building Addition 2175 Camino Vida Roble Carlsbad, California LAWCRANDALL Project 70341-0-0066 Dear Mr. Zuniga: Pursuant to the request of Mr. Andrew Atkinson of your firm, we are pleased to provide preliminary recommendations for the pavement structural section for the subject project. Based on limited subsurface information obtained during our May 2000 geotechnical investigation for the subject project, the following pavement structural sections may be used for preliminary design. Preliminary Paving Structural Sections Traffic Use Automobile Traffic, Parking Heavy Traffic, Driveways Traffic Index 4.5 6.0 Asphaltic Concrete (inches) 3 4 Base Course (inches) 6 9 The pavement sections were established using the design criteria of the State of California, Department of Transportation, an assumed R-value of 20 for the subgrade soils observed during our May 2000 geotechnical investigation and the noted Traffic Index for light and heavy traffic areas. We recommended that the actual R-value of the subgrade soils be confirmed prior to final pavement design. The base course should meet the specifications for Class II Aggregate Base as defined in Section 26 of the State of California, Department of Transportation, Standard Specifications, current edition. Alternatively, the base course could meet the specifications for untreated base materials as defined in Section 200-2 of the current edition of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction ("Greenbook"). The base course should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum density as evaluated by ASTM D1557-91. The upper 1-foot of the pavement subgrade should also be compacted to at least 95% of ASTM D155 7-91. Careful observation is recommended to evaluate that the pavement subgrade is uniformly compacted and the recommended pavement and base course thicknesses are achieved, and that good construction procedures are used. A Division of LAW Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc. 9177 Sky Park Court, Suite A • San Diego, CA 92123 858-278-3600 • Fax: 858-278-5300 Allied Design Group - JWDA Proposed Pacific Bell Building Addition, Carlsbad, CA Preliminary Recommendations for Pavement Design October 25, 2000 LAWCRANDALL Project 70341-0-0066 Concrete pads for trash dumpsters and approaches should be constructed of portland cement concrete with a minimum thickness of 6 inches assuming a modulus of rupture of 600 pounds per square inch. The concrete section should be reinforced with #3 reinforcing bars spaced at 1 8 inches on center each way, and placed in the middle one-third of the section. The information in this letter represents professional opinions that have been developed using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable geotechnical consultants practicing in this or similar localities. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this letter. We trust this information meets your current needs. If you have any questions regarding this letter or require additional information, please contact us. Respectfully submitted, LAWCRANDALL Engineering and Systal, P.E. Project Engineer (2 copies submitted) g: \eng\prj\} WDA \0-0066\P-01 \Corr\Preliminary Pavemenl Design ipjimental Services, In avin K. Thomasson Chief Engineer Vice President LAW Crandall LAWGIBB Group Member REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED PACIFIC BELL BUILDING ADDITION 2175 CAMINO VIDA ROBLE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA (J Prepared for: ALLIED DESIGN GROUP - JWDA San Diego, California May 10, 2000 LAWCRANDALL Project 70341-0-0066 LAW May 10,2000 Mr. Dennis F. Seguban Allied Design Group - JWDA 2359 Fourth Avenue, Suite 300 San Diego, California 92101-1606 Subject: Report of Geotechnica) Investigation Proposed Pacific Bell Building Addition 2175 Camino Vida Roble Carlsbad, California LAWCRANDALL Project 70341-0-0066 Dear Mr. Seguban: LAWCRANDALL (LAW) is pleased to submit our report of geotechnical investigation of the site of the subject project. This investigation was conducted in accordance with our proposal dated April 10, 2000, as authorized by your firm on April 17, 2000. This report presents the results of our evaluation of the physical characteristics of the soil at the site of the proposed addition. Also included are our recommendations for design of foundations, for floor slab support, and for earthwork. The results of the geotechnical field explorations and laboratory tests as well as our limited geologic-seismic hazard evaluation are also presented. It has been a pleasure to be of professional service to you on this project and we look forward to continuing our working relationship. Please call us if you have any questions regarding this report, or if we can be of further service to you on this or future projects. Sincerely, LAWCRANDALL AI^iy.isinn olLaw Engineerin tal Services, Inc. Brian E, Crystal, P.E. Project Engineer Rzonca, C.E.G. gineering Geologist ucnoias icrr;>cnmitt, P.E. (KY) Principal Engineer g: \eng\prj\JWDA \0-0066\P-0! \Rpt\Pacific Bell Camino Vida Roble Report (3 copies submitted) L.aw/Crandall, A Division of Law Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc. 9177 Sky Park Court, Suite A • San Diego, CA 92123 858-278-3600 • Fax 858-278-5300 REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED PACIFIC BELL BUILDING ADDITION 2175 CAMINO VIDA ROBLE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA Prepared For: ALLIED DESIGN GROUP - JWDA San Diego, California Prepared By: LAWCRANDALL San Diego, California May 102000 LAWCRANDALL Project 70341-0-0066 Allied Design Group - JWDA May 10, 2000 Proposed Pacific Bell Building Addition, Camino Vida Roble, Carlsbad, CA LAwCRANDALL Project 70341-0-0066 Report ofGeotechnical Investigation TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1.0 SCOPE 1 2.0 PROJECT INFORMATION 2 2.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2 2.2 SITE CONDITION 2 3.0 FIELD EXPLORATIONS AND LABORATORY TESTS 3 3.1 FIELD EXPLORATIONS 3 3.2 LABORATORY TESTS 3 4.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 4 5.0 LIMITED GEOLOGIC-SEISMIC EVALUATION 5 5.1 GEOLOGIC SETTING 5 5.2 GEOLOGIC HAZARDS 5 5.3 CONCLUSIONS 8 6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 9 6.1 GENERAL 9 6.2 FOUNDATIONS 10 6.3 RETAINING WALLS 11 6.4 SITE COEFFICIENT AND SEISMIC ZONATION 12 6.5 FLOOR SLAB SUPPORT 13 6.6 EARTHWORK 14 6.6 GEOTECHNICAL OBSERVATION 16 7.0 BASIS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS 18 8.0 BIBLIOGRAPHY 19 LIST OF FIGURES 1 Plot Plan 2 Geologic Map 3 Regional Faults/Seismicity APPENDICES APPENDIX: FIELD EXPLORATIONS AND LABORATORY TESTING Allied Design Group - JWDA May 10, 2000 Proposed Pacific Bell Building Addition, Camino VidaRoble, Carlsbad, CA LAWCRANDM.L Project 70341-0-0066 Report ofGeotechnical Investigation 1.0 SCOPE This report presents the results of our geotechnical investigation performed for the proposed Pacific Bell building addition at 2175 Camino Vida Roble in Carlsbad, California. The locations of the proposed addition and our explorations are shown in Figure 1, Plot Plan. The purpose of our geotechnical investigation was to identify the geotechnical conditions and geologic hazards at the site and to provide recommendations for the design of foundations, for floor slab support, and for earthwork. Our geotechnical investigation consisted of the following tasks: • A limited geologic-seismic hazards evaluation to identify the geologic conditions beneath the site and geologic hazards that may affect the project. • A foundation investigation to determine the physical properties of the soils beneath the site and to provide recommendations for the design of foundations, for floor slab support, and for earthwork. Studies to assess environmental hazards that may affect the site were beyond the scope of this investigation. Our recommendations are based on the results of our field explorations and laboratory tests, geologic studies, and appropriate engineering analyses. The results of the field explorations and laboratory tests are presented in the Appendix. Our professional services have been performed using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable geotechnica! consultants practicing in this or similar localities. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this report. This report has been prepared for Allied Design Group - JWDA and their design consultants to be used solely in the design of the proposed development. The report has not been prepared for use by other parties, and may not contain sufficient information for purposes of other parties or other uses. Allied Design Group - JWDA May 10, 2000 Proposed Pacific Bell Building Addition, Camino Vida Roble, Carlsbad, CA LAW€RANOALL Project 70341-0-0066 Report of Geotechnical Investigation 2.0 PROJECT INFORMATION 2.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION We understand that the proposed addition will consist of constructing a two-story building addition adjacent to the southside to the existing Pacific Bell building. The building addition will approximately 7,200 square feet in plan and will be constructed of reinforced concrete and masonry units. Design loading information was not provided but is anticipated to be light to moderate, less than 120 kips and maximum wall loads of less than 3.5 kips per linear foot. The finish floor elevation of the addition will be established at approximately Elevation 208 feet above Mean Sea Level (msl) to match grade with the existing Pacific Bell building. A retaining wall up to 12 feet in height and retaining a 2:1 (horizontal to vertical) slope that is up to 16 feet high will be constructed into the existing slope along the southern and eastern portion of the project site. Based on the existing grades, up to 15 feet of cut will be required to construct to the retaining wall. The remaining earthwork will primarily consist of minor site grading and excavation and backfilling of utility trenches. 2.2 SITE CONDITION The site of the proposed building addition is adjacent to the existing Pacific Bell facility at 2175 Camino Vida Roble in Carlsbad, California. The building addition site is relatively flat and currently used for surface parking. Existing grades range between approximate Elevation 212 msl to Elevation 207 msl. A 20-foot high 2:1 slope, which slopes downward from the south to the north, encompasses the southern portion of the site. Allied Design Group - JWDA May 10, 2000 Proposed Pacific Bell Building Addition, Camino VidaRoble, Carlsbad, CA LAWCR.4NDA1.L Project 70341-0-0066 Report ofGeotechnical Investigation 3.0 FIELD EXPLORATIONS AND LABORATORY TESTS 3.1 FIELD EXPLORATIONS The soil and groundwater conditions beneath the site of the proposed building addition were explored by drilling four borings to depths of 8 to 21 feet below the existing grade using 8-inch diameter hollow-stem auger drilling equipment at the locations shown on Figure 1. Boring 2 was terminated short of planned depths due to drilling refusal and relocated 3 feet to the southwest. Boring 2 extend to 21 feet at its relocated position. Details of the explorations and the logs of the borings are presented in the Appendix. 3.2 LABORATORY TESTS Laboratory tests were performed on selected samples obtained from the borings to aid in the classification of the soils and to determine the pertinent engineering properties of the foundation soils. The following tests were performed: • Moisture content and dry density determinations • Direct shear tests • Consolidation tests • Expansion index tests All testing was done in general accordance with applicable ASTM specifications. Details of the laboratory testing program and test results are also presented in the Appendix. Allied Design Group - JWDA May 10. 2000 Proposed Pacific Bell Building Addition, Camino Vida Roble, Carlsbad, CA LAWCRANDAiL Project 70341-0-0066 Report ofGeotechnical Investigation 4.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Fill soils ranging between 3 to 6 feet thick were encountered in all of our exploratory borings. The fill consists of silty and clayey sand and clayey silt with some asphalt and concrete debris. The fill does not appear to be uniformly compacted and we are unaware of any documentation regarding the placement. Accordingly, the fill is considered undocumented and is not considered suitable for structural support. Colluvial soils were encountered in three of our borings. The colluvium consists of dense fine to coarse clayey sand. Beneath the fill and colluvium, the site is underlain by bedrock of the middle Eocene age Santiago Formation (Tan and Kennedy, 1996). Where encountered in our exploratory borings, the Santiago Formation consists of massive dense siltstone. Based on laboratory tests, the clayey silt fill soils, apparently derived from the Santiago Formation, exhibit a medium expansion potential. Water was encountered at depth of 6 feet below the existing grade in Boring 3. The water probably represents a localized perched condition flowing down the adjacent slope on top of the bedrock. Groundwater or water seepage was not encountered in any other of our borings. Allied Design Group - JWDA May 10, 2000 Proposed Pacific Bell Building Addition, Camino VidaRoble, Carlsbad, CA LAWCRAXDAI.L Project "0341 -0-0066 Report ofGeotechnical Investigation 5.0 LIMITED GEOLOGIC-SEISMIC EVALUATION 5.1 GEOLOGIC SETTING The site is located within the Coastal Plain of the Peninsular Ranges geomorphic province in western San Diego County. The dominant structural trend of the Peninsular Range is defined by faults associated with the Rose Canyon and Elsinore fault zones, along with other similar northerly and northwesterly-trending fault zones in Southern and Baja California. The coastal plain is a narrow strip, 5 to 10 miles wide, consisting of Pleistocene age marine terrace deposits. These were developed and preserved as a result of seaward regression and regional uplift since early Pleistocene time (Eisenberg, 1985). Subsequent erosion has created a mesa-like topography exposing the older Tertiary age units in the vicinity of the site. The eastern margin of the coastal plain is the contact between the Tertiary sedimentary rocks and the underlying Southern California Batholith, which is exposed to the east. The areal geology in the vicinity of the site is depicted on Figure 2, Local Geology. The site is shown in relation to major fault zones and earthquake epicenters on Figure 3, Regional Faults and Seism icity. 5.2 GEOLOGIC HAZARDS Faults The numerous faults in Southern California include active, potentially active, and inactive faults. The definition of fault terms used in this report are based on those developed for the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zones Act of 1972, by the California Division of Mines and Geology (Hart, 1994). Active faults are defined as those that have had surface displacement within Holocene time (approximately the last 11,000 years) and/or have been included within an Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone. Faults are considered potentially active if they show evidence of surface displacement since the beginning of Quaternary time (about two million years ago) but not since the beginning of Holocene time. Inactive faults are those that have not had surface movement since the beginning of Quaternary time. The site is not within a current Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone for fault surface rupture hazard. No active or potentially active faults are known to pass directly beneath or project towards the site. Allied Design Group - JWDA May W, 2000 Proposed Pacific Bell Building Addition, Camino VidaRoble, Carlsbad, CA LAwCRAXDAU. Project ~0341-0-0066 Report ofGeotechnical Investigation Therefore, the potential for surface rupture due to faulting occurring beneath the site during the design life of the proposed structure is considered low. Active Faults The closest known active faults to the site are within the Rose Canyon Fault Zone (RCFZ). This fault zone comes onshore in La Jolla Bay and extends south-southeast through Rose Canyon along the inland edge of Mission Bay to downtown San Diego. The closest mapped trace of the fault zone is offshore located 6.4 miles (10.3 kilometers) southwest of the site. Known major active faults (some within the RCFZ) or fault zones that could cause significant ground shaking at the site include the: Newport-Inglewood Fault Zone located 9.2 miles (14.8 kilometers) northwest; Coronado Bank fault located 22 miles (36 kilometers) southwest; Elsinore fault located 23 miles (37 kilometers) northeast of the site; Spanish Bight fault located about 27 miles (43 kilometers) south-southeast; Coronado fault located 29 miles (47 kilometers) south-southeast; Silver Strand fault located 30 miles (48 kilometers) south-southeast; San Diego Trough fault located 32 miles (51 kilometers) southwest; San Miguel-Vallecitos fault located 42 miles (68 kilometers) south- southeast; and the San Jacinto Fault Zone located 47 miles (76 kilometers) northeast of the site. The active San Andreas Fault, which is generally considered the most significant fault in California, is located 61 miles (98 kilometers) northeast of the site. Potentially Active Faults The closest major potentially active fault to the site is the Encinitas fault. This fault is located approximately 1.4 miles (2.3 kilometers) south-south east of the site. Other, nearby, potentially active faults include the La Costa Ave. fault located 2.4 miles (3,9 kilometers) south-southwest, Carmel Valley fault located 16 miles (25 kilometers) south-southeast, Christianitos fault located 24 miles (39 kilometers) north-northwest, Florida Canyon fault located 25 miles (41 kilometers) south-southeast, Fort Rosecrans fault located 25 miles (41 kilometers) south-southeast of the site, La Nacion fault zone located approximately 26 miles (42 kilometers) south-southeast, Point Loma fault located 26 miles (43 kilometers) south-southeast, and Texas Street fault located 27 miles (44 kilometers) south-southeast. Seismicity The site is located in northwestern San Diego County, an area of low seismicity compared to the general Southern California area, which has high seismic activity considered as a whole. A Hied Design Group - JWDA May 10, 2000 Proposed Pacific Bell Building Addition, Camino Vida Roble, Carlsbad, CA LAWCRANL>.4LL Project 70341-0-0066 Report of Geotechnical Investigation Historically (approximately the last 200 years), only one large-magnitude earthquake has occurred in the immediate metropolitan San Diego area. However, the San Diego area has been subject to ground shaking on many other occasions as a result of earthquakes in the surrounding, more highly seismic Southern California/Northern Baja California and offshore regions. Locations of significant faults, and epicenters of major earthquakes (magnitude greater than 6.0) in the surrounding area, are shown on Figure 3, Regional Faults and Seismicity. The site could be subjected to strong ground motion in the event of an earthquake. However, this hazard is common in Southern California and the effects of ground shaking can be mitigated if the proposed development is designed and constructed in conformance with current building codes and engineering practices. Liquefaction and Seismically-Induced Settlement Liquefaction potential is greatest where the ground water level is shallow, and loose, fine sands occur within a depth of about 50 feet or less. Groundwater was encountered at a depth of 6 feet below the ground surface in Boring 3. However, this is a perched condition and the soils encountered below the water are consolidated formational deposits (siltstone of the Santiago Formation) and are not considered liquefiable. Therefore, the potential for liquefaction and associated ground deformation occurring beneath the site is considered remote. Subsidence The site is not within an area of known subsidence associated with fluid withdrawal (groundwater or petroleum), peat oxidation, or hydrocompaction. Landsliding and Lurching The existing slope on the south margin of the site did not show indications of instability. The referenced Geologic Map (Tan and Kennedy, 1996), Figure 2 of this report, does not show a mapped landslide to underlie or be within the boundaries of the property. The potential for lurching to affect to the slope is considered low since it is graded to a relatively low inclination (2:1 horizontal to vertical) and much of the slope will be removed and supported by retaining wall planned for site construction. Allied Design Group - JWDA May ! 0. 2000 Proposed Pacific Bell Building Addition, Camino VidaRoble, Carlsbad, CA LAW€RANDALL Project 70341-0-0066 Report ofGeotechnical Investigation Tsunamis, Seiches, and Flooding The site is located about 214 miles inland from the Pacific Ocean at an elevation of approximately 210 feet above sea level. Therefore, the risk of damage from seismic sea waves (tsunamis) is low. The site is not located downslope or near large bodies of water that could adversely affect the site in the event of earthquake-induced failures or seiches (wave oscillations in an enclosed or semi- enclosed body of water). 5.3 CONCLUSIONS Based on the available geologic data, no known active or potentially active faults with the potential for surface fault rupture are known to exist beneath the site. Accordingly, the potential for surface rupture at the site due to faulting is considered low during the design life of the proposed building. Although the site could be subjected to strong ground shaking in the event of an earthquake, this hazard is common in Southern California and the effects of ground shaking can be mitigated if the buildings are designed and constructed in conformance with current building codes and engineering practices. The existing slope of the south margin of the subject site did not show indications of instability. The characteristics of the earth material forming the slope were not explored for this Report of Geotechnical Investigation since access to the slope was not readily achievable and most of the slope will be removed and supported by a retaining wall. Consequently, the back cut to place the retaining wall on the south slope of the project should be observed by a representative of our firm to verify the slope does not possess existing instabilities. Additionally, the field observations of the back cut will verify the assumptions and recommendation in this report. These observations should be performed during the grading of the back cut and prior to placement of foundation constituents. The potential for other geologic hazards such as liquefaction, seismic settlement, subsidence, flooding, tsunamis, inundation, and seiches affecting the site is considered low to remote. Allied Design Group - JWDA May 10, 2000 Proposed Pacific Bell Building Addition, Camino Vida Robie, Carlsbad, CA LAWCRANDALL Project '0341-0-0066 Report of Geotechnical Investigation 6.2 FOUNDATIONS Bearing Value Footings established in properly compacted fill may be designed to impose a dead-plus-live load pressure of 3,000 pounds per square foot. All footings should be established at a depth of at least 2 feet below the lowest adjacent grade or floor level, whichever is lower. Footing excavations should be deepened as necessary to extend into satisfactory soils. A one-third increase in the bearing value can be used for wind or seismic loads. The recommended bearing value is a net value, and the weight of concrete in the footings can be taken as 50 pounds per cubic foot; the weight of soil backfill can be neglected when determining the downward loads. Settlement Structural loads are not known at the time of this investigation. However, structural loads are anticipated to be light to moderate (column loads less than 120 kips and wall loads less than 3.5 kips per lineal foot) and settlement of the proposed building addition supported on spread footings as recommended, should be less than '/2 inch. Differential settlement should be less than 1A inch. Lateral Loads Lateral loads may be resisted by friction and by the passive resistance of the soils. A coefficient of friction of 0.4 may be used between footings or the slab-on-grade floors for the suitable underlying soils or bedrock materials. The passive resistance may be assumed to be equal to the pressure developed by a fluid with a density of 300 pounds per cubic foot. A one-third increase in the passive value may be used for wind or seismic loads. The passive resistance of the materials may be combined with the frictional resistance without reduction in determining the total lateral resistance. Footing Observation To verify the presence of satisfactory materials at design elevations, all footing excavations should be observed by personnel of our firm. Footing excavations should be cleaned of any loosened soil and debris before placing steel or concrete. Footing excavations should be observed and probed for 10 Allied Design Group - JWDA May 10, 2000 Proposed Pacific Bell Building Addition, Camino VidaRoble, Carlsbad, CA LAwCRANDALL Project 70341-0-0066 Report ofGeotechnical Investigation soft areas. Any soft or loose soils or unsatisfactory materials should be removed and replaced with lean concrete, two-sack sand-cement slurry, or compacted fill. All applicable requirements of the California Construction and General Industry Safety Orders, the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, and the Construction Safety Act should be met. Inspection of footing excavations may be required by the appropriate reviewing governmental agencies. The contractor should be familiar with the inspection requirements of the reviewing agencies. 6.3 RETAINING WALLS The on-site clayey soils should not be used in the retaining wall backfill. The lateral earth pressures presented below are based on the use of on-site, non-expansive sandy materials (if available) or imported select backfill within a 1:1 prism behind the wall. All backfill material should be approved by our firm prior to placement. Lateral Earth Pressure For design of cantilevered retaining walls, where the backfill is level and consists of non- expansive, granular, free-draining soils, it may be assumed that the recommended backfill soils will exert a lateral pressure equal to that developed by a fluid with a density equal to 35 pounds per cubic foot. Where the earth slopes upward at 2:1 behind the wall, an equivalent fluid pressure of 54 pounds per cubic foot should be used. Seismic Lateral Earth Pressure In addition to the above-mentioned lateral earth pressures, retaining walls more than 6 feet high should be designed to support a seismic active pressure. The recommended seismic active pressure distribution on the wall is illustrated in the following diagram with the maximum pressure equal to 15H pounds per square foot, where H is the wall height in feet. 11 Allied Design Group - JWDA Proposed Pacific Bell Building Addition, Camino VidaRoble, Carlsbad, CA Report ofGeotechnical Investigation May 10,2000 LAWCSANDALL Project 70341-0-0066 H = HEIGHT OF WALL IN FEET Drainage Retaining walls should be designed to resist hydrostatic pressures or be provided with a drain pipe or weepholes. The drain could consist of a 4-inch-diameter perforated pipe placed with perforations down at the base of the wall. The pipe should be sloped at least 2 inches in 100 feet and surrounded by filter gravel. The filter gravel should meet the requirements of Class II Permeable Material as defined in the current State of California, Department of Transportation, Standard Specifications. If Caltrans Class II Permeable Material is not available, 3/4-inch crushed rock or gravel separated from the on-site soils by an appropriate filter fabric can be used. The crushed rock or gravel should have less than 5% passing a No. 200 sieve. 6.4 SITE COEFFICIENT AND SEISMIC ZONATION The site coefficient, S, can be determined as established in the Earthquake Regulations under Section 1629 of the UBC, 1997 edition, for seismic design of the proposed building addition. Based on a review of the local soil and geologic conditions, the site may be classified as Soil Profile Type SB, as specified in the 1997 code. The site is located within UBC Seismic Zone 4. 12 Allied Design Group - JWDA May 10. 2000 Proposed Pacific Bell Building Addition, Camino Vida Roble, Carlsbad, CA LAW€RANDALL Project '0341-0-0066 Report ofGeotechnical Investigation The site is near the Rose Canyon Fault Zone (RCFZ), which has been determined to be a Type B seismic source by the California Division of Mines and Geology. According to Map 0-36 in the 1998 publication from the International Conference of Building Officials entitled "Maps of Known Active Fault Near-Source Zones in California and Adjacent Portions of Nevada," the proposed building addition is located at a distance of more than 10 kilometers from the RCFZ. At this distance for a seismic source type B, the near source factors, Na and Nv, are to be taken as 1.0 and 1.0 respectively, based on Tables 16-S and 16-T of the 1997 UBC. 6.5 FLOOR SLAB SUPPORT If the grading recommendations presented in this report are followed, the floor slabs of the proposed buildings may be supported on grade. The on-site clayey soils are moderately expansive, and floor slabs and adjacent walks should be underlain by at least 12 inches of properly compacted fill consisting of relatively non-expansive soils. Construction activities and exposure to the environment can cause deterioration of the prepared subgrade. Therefore, we recommend that our field representative observe the condition of the final subgrade soils immediately prior to slab-on-grade construction, and, if necessary, perform further density and moisture content tests to determine the suitability of the final prepared subgrade. If vinyl or other moisture-sensitive floor covering is planned, we recommend that the floor slab in such areas be underlain by a capillary break consisting of a vapor-retarding membrane over a 4- inch-thick layer of gravel. A 2-inch-thick layer of sand should be placed between the gravel and the membrane to decrease the possibility of damage to the membrane. We suggest the following gradation for the gravel: Sieve Size V No. 4 No. 100 Percent Passing 90-100 0- 10 0-3 Low-slump concrete should be used to minimize possible curling of the slab. A 2-inch-thick layer of coarse sand can be placed over the vapor retarding membrane to reduce slab curling. If this sand bedding is used, care should be taken during the placement of the concrete to prevent displacement 13 Allied Design Group - JWDA May 10, 2000 Proposed Pacific Bell Building Addition, Camino VidaRoble, Carlsbad, CA LAW€RANDAI.L Project 7034}-0-0066 Report ofGeotechnical Investigation of the sand. The concrete slab should be allowed to cure properly before placing vinyl or other moisture-sensitive floor covering. 6.6 EARTHWORK General The existing undocumented fill soils are not considered suitable for support, all existing fill should be removed and replaced with compacted fill. Based on the existing grades, up to 15 feet of cut will be required to construct to the retaining wall into the existing slope. The back cut should be sloped no steeper than at 3A:\ (horizontal to vertical) in the bedrock materials and at 1:1 in the existing fill materials. Steeper cut would require temporary shoring. The retaining wall backfill should be properly keyed at the base of the slope and benched horizontally into firm materials in the back cut as the fill progresses upward. The removal and replacement of the existing fill, the back cut for the retaining wall, and the compaction of all required fills should be observed at the time of initial grading by personnel from our firm to verify the anticipated geologic conditions and make any necessary modifications. The remaining earthwork will primarily consist of minor site grading and the excavation and backfilling of utility trenches. All fill and backfill soils should be compacted and as recommended in this report. Excavation The existing fills are not expected to pose unusual excavation difficulties and conventional earthmoving equipment may be used. The bedrock materials at the site may vary from weakly to moderately cemented. Heavier earthmoving equipment may be required in the more cemented bedrock materials. Blasting should not be required. Where there is not sufficient space for sloped embankments, shoring will be required. Temporary unsurcharged excavations may generally be made at %:\ (horizontal to vertical) in the bedrock materials and at 1:1 in the existing fill materials. Some sloughing of the surface soils and fills should be anticipated. The excavations should be observed by our firm so that any necessary modifications in slopes can be made based on variations in the soil conditions encountered in the field. 14 Allied Design Group -JWDA May 10. 2000 Proposed Pacific Bell Building Addition, Camino Vida Roble, Carlsbad, CA LAWCKAKDALL Project "0341-0-0066 Report ofGeotechnica! Investigation The bottom of any unshored excavation should be restricted so as not to extend below a plane inclined at 1V£:1 downward from the footings of adjacent existing structures unless shoring and/or underpinning are provided. Where sloped excavations are used, the tops of the slopes should be barricaded to prevent vehicles and storage loads within 10 feet of the tops of excavated slopes. If the temporary construction slopes are to be maintained during the rainy season, berms are recommended along the tops of the slopes, to prevent runoff water from entering the excavation and eroding the slope faces. All applicable requirements of the California Construction and General Industry Safety Orders, the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, and the Construction Safety Act should be met. Subgrade Preparation and Moisture Conditioning After clearing the site of existing pavement and debris and removing all the existing fill, the exposed natural soils should be observed for debris, organic material, or other undesirable materials and should be scarified to a depth of 6 inches, moisture conditioned to within 2% of optimum moisture content, and compacted to at least 90% of the maximum dry density obtainable by the ASTM Designation D1557-91 method of compaction. Compaction After observing and compacting the exposed subgrade soils, any required fill should be placed in horizontal lifts not more than 8 inches in loose thickness and compacted to at least 90% of the maximum dry density in accordance with ASTM D1557-91. The moisture content of the fill should be maintained at optimum or about 2% above optimum during compaction. Material for Fill The on-site soils, less any contaminated soil, debris or organic matter may be used in the required site fills. However, because of their expansive characteristics, the on-site clayey soils should not be used within 12 inches of the subgrade for floor slabs, walks, and other slabs or as retaining wall backfill. Any rock or other soil fragments greater than 4 inches in size should not be used in the required fills. Any required imported fill, such as for retaining wall backfill, should consist of relatively non- expansive granular soils with an Expansion Index (ASTM D4829-95) of less than 20. Import 15 Allied Design Group - JWDA May 10. 2000 Proposed Pacific Bell Building Addition, Camino I'ida Roble, Carlsbad, CA LAWCRANDALL Project '0341-0-0066 Report ofGeotechnical Investigation material should be approved by our firm prior to arrival at the site and should contain sufficient fines (binder material) so as to provide a compacted fill that will be relatively impermeable and will be stable in shallow trenches. Backfill All required structural and utility trench backfill should be mechanically compacted. Flooding should not be permitted. The exterior grades should be sloped to drain away from the structures to minimize ponding of water adjacent to the basement walls and foundations. Minimum site gradients of at least 5% in the landscaped areas and of 1% in the hardscaped areas are recommended in the areas surrounding buildings. Compaction of the backfill as recommended herein will be necessary to reduce settlement of the backfill and associated settlement of the overlying walks, paving, and utilities. All backfill below structures, slabs and pavements and structural fill should be compacted to at least 90% (ASTM D1557-91). The on-site clayey soils should not be used as retaining wall backfill. 6.6 GEOTECHNICAL OBSERVATION The reworking of the upper soils and the compaction of all required fill should be observed and tested during placement by a representative of our firm. This representative should perform at least the following duties: • Observe the clearing and grubbing operations for proper removal of all unsuitable materials including existing on-site fill soils. • Observe the exposed subgrade in areas to receive fill and in areas where excavation has resulted in the desired finished subgrade. The representative should also observe proofrolling and delineation of areas requiring overexcavation. • Evaluate the suitability of on-site and import soils for fill placement and retaining wall backfill; collect and submit soil samples for required or recommended laboratory testing where necessary. • Observe the fill and backfill for uniformity during placement. • Test backfill for field density and compaction to determine the percentage of compaction achieved during backfill placement. • Observe and probe foundation materials to confirm that suitable bearing materials are present at the design foundation depths. 16 Allied Design Group - JWDA May 10, 2000 Proposed Pacific Bell Building Addition, Camino Vida Roble, Carlsbad, CA LAwCRAXDAU. Project ~0341-0-0066 Report of Geotechnical Investigation • Observe the back cut of the proposed retaining wall. The governmental agencies having jurisdiction over the project should be notified prior to commencement of grading so that the necessary grading permits can be obtained and arrangements can be made for required inspection(s). The contractor should be familiar with the inspection requirements of the reviewing agencies. 17 Allied Design Group-JWDA May 10, 2000 Proposed Pacific Bell Building Addition, Camino VidaRoble, Carlsbad, CA LAWCRAXDALi. Project ~0341-0-0066 Report ofGeotechnical Investigation 7.0 BASIS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS The recommendations provided in this report are based on our understanding of the described project information and on our interpretation of the data collected during the subsurface exploration. We have made our recommendations based on experience with similar subsurface conditions under similar loading conditions. The recommendations apply to the specific project discussed in this report; therefore, the building loads, and any change in building, wall, or site grades, should be provided to us so we may review our conclusions and recommendations and make any necessary modifications. The recommendations provided in this report are also based on the assumption that representatives of our firm will perform the necessary geotechnical observations and testing during construction. The field observation services are considered a continuation of the geotechnical investigation and essential to verify that the actual soil conditions are as anticipated. This also provides for the procedure whereby Pacific Bel! and Allied Design Group - JWDA can be advised of unanticipated or changed conditions that would require modifications of our original recommendations. In addition, the presence of our representative at the site provides Pacific Bel! and Allied Design Group - JWDA with an independent professional opinion regarding the geotechnical-related construction procedures. If another firm were retained for the geotechnical observation services, our professional responsibility and liability would be limited to the extent that we would not be the geotechnical engineer of record. 18 Allied Design Group - JWDA May 10, 2000 Proposed Pacific Bel! Building Addition, Camino Vida Roble, Carlsbad, CA £jwOuv0.4U Project 70341-0-0066 Report of Geotechnical Investigation 8.0 BIBLIOGRAPHY Agnew, D.C., 1979, "Tsunami History of San Diego," in Abbot, P.L., and Elliott, W.J., editors, "Earthquakes and other Perils, San Diego Region" San Diego Association of Geologists, p. 47-60. Alfors, J.T., Burnett, J.L., Gay, I.E., 1973, "Urban Geology: Master Plan for California." California Division of Mines and Geology, Bulletin 198. Anderson, John G., and Luco, J. Enrique, 1983, "Consequences of Slip Rate Constraints on Earthquake Occurrence Relations," Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 73, No. 2, p. 471-496. Anderson, J.G., Rockwell, T.K., and Agnew, D.C., 1989, "Past and Possible Future Earthquakes of Significance to the San Diego Region," Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 5, No. 2, p 299-333. Applied Technology Council, ATC-40, Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings, developed under a contract with the California Seismic Safety Commission (published 1996, combined volumes, 626 pages). Artim, E.R., and Streiff, D., 1981, "Trenching the Rose Canyon Fault Zone, San Diego, California," United States Geologic Survey Open File Report 81-879. Artim, E. R., and Pinckney, C. J., 1973, "La Nacion Fault System, San Diego, California", Geological Society of America, \. 84, no. 3, p. 1075-1080. ASTM, 1997, "Soil and Rock: American Society for Testing and Materials", vol. 4.08 for ASTM test methods D-420 to D-4914, 153 standards, 1,026 pages; and vol. 4.09 for ASTM test methods D-4943 to highest #, 161 standards, 1,036 pages. Blake, T., 1998, "FRISKSP, A Computer Program for Probabilistic Estimation of Peak Acceleration and Uniform Hazard Spectra Using 3-D Faults as Earthquake Sources." Bolt, B.A., 1973, "Duration of Strong Ground Motion," in Proceedings, Fifth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Boore, D. M., Joyner, W., and Fumal, T.E., 1997, "Equations For Estimating Horizontal Response Spectra And Peak Acceleration Form Western North American Earthquakes — A Summary Of Recent Work", Seismological Research Letters, v. 68, no. 1, p. 128-153. Boore, D.M., Joyner, W.B., and Fumal, T.E., 1994, "Estimation of Response Spectra and Peak Accelerations from Western North American Earthquakes: An Interim Report, Part 2," U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report 94-127. Boore, D.M., Joyner, W.B., and Fumal, T.E., 1993, "Estimation of Response Spectra and Peak Accelerations from Western North American Earthquakes: An Interim Report," U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report 93-509. California Code of Regulations, Title 24, 1998 "California Building Code," 3 volumes. 19 Allied Design Group - JWDA May 10, 2000 Proposed Pacific Bell Building Addition, Camino VidaRoble, Carlsbad, CA LAWCRANDALL Project "0341-0-0066 Report ofGeotechnical Investigation California Division of Mines and Geology, 1986, "Guidelines to Geologic/Seismic Reports," CDMG Note 42. California Division of Mines and Geology, 1986, "Guidelines for Preparing Engineering Geologic," CDMG Note 44. California Division of Mines and Geology, 1986, "Guidelines for the Review of Geologic/Seismic Reports," CDMG Note 48. California Division of Mines and Geology, 1986, "Guidelines for Evaluating the Hazard of Surface Fault Rupture Review," CDMG Note 49. California Division of Mines and Geology, 1990, "Planning Scenario for a Major Earthquake, San Diego - Tijuana Metropolitan Area California Division of Mines and Geology, 1996, "Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment for the State of California," Open File Report 96-08. California Division of Mines and Geology, 1997, "Guidelines for Evaluating and Mitigating Seismic Hazards in California," Special Publication 117. California Institute of Technology, Magnetic Tape Catalog of Earthquakes for Southern California, 1932-1998. California Mining and Geology Board, 1996, "Guidelines for Evaluating the Hazard of Surface Fault Rupture," California Division of Mines and Geology, 5 pages. Clarke, S.H., Greene, H.G., Kennedy, M.P., and Vedder, J.G., 1987, "Geologic Map of the Inner Southern California Continental Margin," California Division of Mines and Geology Map No. 1A. Dolan, J.F., et al, 1995, "Prospects for Larger or More Frequent Earthquakes in the Los Angeles Metropolitan Region, California," Science, Volume 267, 199-205 pp. Elliott, W.J., 1989, "Age of Landsliding - Implication for Recency of Fault Movement along the LaNacion Fault near Dusk Drive, San Diego California," in Roquemore, G., Tanges, S., and Wright, M., editors, 1989, "Proceedings of the Workshop on Seismic Risk in the San Diego Region: Special Focus on the Rose Canyon Fault System," Southern California Earthquake Preparedness Project, Governor's Office of Emergency Services, p.33-34. Eisenberg, L. I., 1985, "Pleistocene Faults and Marine Terraces, North San Diego County" In: P.A. Abbott, ed., On the Manner of Deposition of the Eocene Strata in North San Diego County, San Diego Association of Geologist Guide Book. Federal Emergency Management Agency, 1989, Flood Insurance Rate Map, City of San Diego, California," Community Panel No. 060295 0128 C. Franzen, S., Lew, M., and Elliott, P.J., 1998, "Multiple Investigation Methods for Fault Rupture Hazard Evaluation," in Proceedings of the First International Conference on Site Characterization, edited by Robertson, P.K.. and Mayne, P.W. 20 Allied Design Group • JWDA May 10, 2000 Proposed Pacific Bell Building Addition, Camino Vida Roble, Carlsbad, CA LiwC RANDALL Project ~034]-0-0066 Report ofGeotechnical Investigation Gastil, R.G., Kies, R., and Melius, D.J., 1979, "Active and Potentially Active Faults: San Diego County and northernmost Baja California, in Abbot, P.L., and Elliott, W.J., editors, "Earthquakes and other Perils, San Diego Region," San Diego Association of Geologists, p. 47-60. Greene, H.G., and Kennedy, M.P., 1987, "Geology of the Inner-Southern California Continental Margin," California Division of Mines and Geology, California Continental Margin Geologic Map Series, Area 1, scale 1:250,000. Greensfelder, R.W., 1974, "Maximum Credible Rock Acceleration from Earthquakes in California," California Division of Mines and Geology Map Sheet 23. Hart, E.W., 1973, revised 1994, "Fault-Rupture Hazard Zones in California, Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act with Index to Earthquake Fault Zone Maps," California Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. Hart, M.W., 1974, " Radiocarbon ages of alluvium overlying the La Nacion Fault, San Diego California," Geologic Society of America Bulletin, v. 85, no 8, p. 1329-1332. Houston, J.R., and Garcia, A.W., 1974, "Type 16 Flood Insurance Study: Tsunami Predictions for Pacific Coastal Communities," U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Hydraulic Laboratory. International Conference of Building Officials (1998): Maps of Known Active Fault Near-Source Zones in California and Adjacent Portions of Nevada, Whittier, California. International Conference of Building Officials (1997): Uniform Building Code, Whittier, California. Jackson, D.D., et al., 1995, "Seismic Hazards in Southern California: Probable Earthquakes, 1994 to 2024, Seismological Society of America Bulletin, Volume 85, Number 2. Jennings, C.W., 1994, "Fault Activity Map of California and Adjacent Areas with Locations and Ages of Recent Volcanic Eruptions," California Division of Mines and Geology Map No. 6. Kahle, J.E., 1988, "A Geomorpbic analysis of the Rose Canyon, La Nacion, and Related Faults in San Diego Area, California," California Division of Mines and Geology Fault Evaluation Report 196. Kennedy, M.P. and Peterson, G.L., 1975, "Geology of the San Diego Metropolitan Area, California," California Division of Mines and Geology, Bulletin 200. Kennedy, M.P., and Tan, S.S., Chapman, R.H., and Chase, G.W., 1975, "Character and Recency of Faulting, San Diego Metropolitan Area, California," California Division of Mines and Geology, Special Report 123. Kennedy, M.P., and Tan, S.S., 1977, "Geology of National City, Imperial Beach, and Otay Mesa Quadrangle, Southern San Diego Metropolitan Area, California.," California Division of Mines and Geology, Map Sheet 29. 21 Atlittf Design Group -JWDA May 10, 2000 Proposed Pacific Bell Building Addition, Camina Vida Roble, Carlsbad, CA LAW€RAND.-ILL Project "0341-0-0066 Report ofGeotechnical Investigation Kennedy, M.P., and Welday, E.E., 1980, "Recency and Character of Faulting Offshore Metropolitan San Diego, California, San Diego Bay and Immediate Offshore Shelf, San Diego County, California," California Division of Mines and Geology, Map Sheet 40. Kennedy, M.P., and Welday, E.E., 1981, "Recency and Character of Faulting Offshore Metropolitan San Diego, California, Point La Jolla to Mexico, San Diego County, California," California Division of Mines and Geology, Map Sheet 42. Kennedy, M.P., Clark, S.H., Greene, H.G., and Legg, M.R., 1980 "Recency and Character of Faulting Offshore Metropolitan San Diego, California," California Division of Mines and Geology, Map Sheet 41. Kern, J.P., 1983 "Earthquakes and Faults in San Diego," Pickle Press. Kohler, S.L., Miller, R.V., 1983, " Mineral Land Classification: Aggregate Materials in the Western San Diego County Production - Consumption Region," California Division of Mines and Geology, Special Report 153. Kuper, H.T., 1976, "Reconnaissance of the Marine Sedimentary Rocks of South Western San Diego County," in Ferrand, G.T., editor, 1977, "Geology of Southwestern San Diego County and Northwestern Baja California," San Diego Association of Geologists. Kuper, H.T., 1989, "La Nacion Fault System - Interpretation from Stratigraphic and Depositional Evidence," in Roquemore, G., Tanges, S., and Wright, M., editors, 1989, "Proceedings of the Workshop on Seismic Risk in the San Diego Region: Special Focus on the Rose Canyon Fault System," Southern California Earthquake Preparedness Project, Governor's Office of Emergency Services, p,3I-32. Lindvall, S.C., Rockwell, T.K., and Lindvall, C.E., 1989, "The Seismic Hazard of San Diego Revised: New Evidence for Magnitude 6+ Holocene Earthquakes on the Rose Canyon Fault Zone," in Roquemore, G., Tanges, S., and Wright, M., editors, 1989, "Proceedings of the Workshop on Seismic Risk in the San Diego Region: Special Focus on the Rose Canyon Fault System," Southern California Earthquake Preparedness Project, Governor's Office of Emergency Services, p.7I-79. Lindvall, S.C., Rockwell, T.K., and Lindvall, C.E., 1990, "The Seismic Hazard of San Diego Revised: New Evidence for Magnitude 6+ Holocene Earthquakes on the Rose Canyon Fault Zone," in Proceedings Volume of the 4th U.S. Conference on Earthquake Engineering, May 1990. Leighton and Associates, update 1983, revisions through August 1995, "City of San Diego Seismic Safety Study." Leighton and Associates, 1993, "City of San Diego Seismic Safety Study." Mark, R.K., 1977, "Application of Linear Statistical Models of Earthquake Magnitude Versus Fault Length in Estimating Maximum Expectable Earthquakes," Geology, Vol. 5, pp. 464-466. Marshall, Monte, 1989, "Detailed Gravity Studies and the Tetectonics of the Rose Canyon - Point Loma - La Nacion Fault System, San Diego, California," in Roquemore, G., Tanges, S., and 22 A Hied Design Group - JWDA May 10, 2000 Proposed Pacific Bell Building Addition, Camino VidaRoble, Carlsbad, CA LAWCRANDALL Project 70341-0-0066 Report ofGeotechnical Investigation Wright, M., editors, 1989, "Proceedings of the Workshop on Seismic Risk in the San Diego Region: Special Focus on the Rose Canyon Fault System," Southern California Earthquake Preparedness Project, Governor's Office of Emergency Services, p.80 - 99. Mualchin, L. and Jones, A.L., 1992, "Peak Acceleration From Maximum Credible Earthquakes in California (Rock and Stiff-Soil Sites)," California Division of Mines and Geology Open-File Report 92-1. OSHPD (Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development), 1995, "Reconciliation Between OSHPD Review and Seismic Hazards Mapping Approaches to Probabilistic Seismic Hazards Assessments, Division of Mines and Geology, Status Report Dated January 18. Petersen, M.D., Bryant, W.A., and Cramer, C.H., 1996, "California Fault Parameters," California Division of Mines and Geology, Open-File Report 96-08, downloaded from www .conrv .ca.gov/dmg/shezp/fltindex.html. Poland, J.R., Garrett, A.A., and Sinnott, Allen, 1959, "Geology, Hydrology, and.Chemical Character of Groundwaters in the Torrance-Santa Monica Area, California," U.S. Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 1461. Rockwell, T,K., 1998, "Personal Communication Regarding Faulting in San Diego Bay." Roquemore, G., Tanges, S., and Wright, M., editors, 1989, "Proceedings of the Workshop on Seismic Risk in the San Diego Region: Special Focus on the Rose Canyon Fault System," Southern California Earthquake Preparedness Project, Governor's Office of Emergency Services, 106 p. San Diego, City of, 1979, "Seismic Safety Element," Progress Guide and General Plan. San Diego, City of, 1995, "Seismic Safety Study, Geologic Hazards and Faults," Map No. 17. San Diego, County of, 1974, "Landslides," San Diego County Planning Department, Map No. 1, Scale: 1 inch to 2 miles. San Diego, County of, 1975, "Seismic Safety Element," General Plan. Sieh, K.E., 1984, "Lateral Offsets and Revised Dates of Large Pre-historic Earthquakes at Fallen Creek, California," Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 9, pp. 7461-7670. Shaw, J.H., 1993, "Active Blind-Thrust Faulting and Strike-Slip Folding in California," Ph.D. Thesis, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, 216 pp. Slemmons, D.B., 1979, "Evaluation of Geomorphic Features of Active Faults For Engineering Design and Siting Studies," Association of Engineering Geologists Short Course. Streiff, D., Elder-Mills, D., and Artim, E.R., 1982, "The Rose Canyon Fault Zone, Downtown San Diego and Coronado," in Abbott, P.C., editor, "Geologic Studies in San Diego, San Diego Association of Geologist Field Trips." 23 A Hied Design Group - JWDA May 10, 2000 Proposed Pacific Bell Building Addition, Camino Vida Roble, Carlsbad, CA LAWCRANDALL Project 70341-0-0066 Report ofGeotechnical Investigation Tan, S.S., and Kennedy, M.P., 1996, "Geologic Maos of the Northwestern Part of San Diego County, California," California Division of Mines and Geology, Open File Report 96-02. Kennedy, M.P., and Tan, S.S., 1977, "Geology of National City, Imperial Beach, and Otay Mesa Quadrangle, Southern San Diego Metropolitan Area, California," California Division of Mines and Geology, Map Sheet 29. Testing Engineers-San Diego, Dames & Moore, Woodward-Clyde Consultants, 1985 "Geologic and Fault Investigation, San Diego Police Administration and Technical Center." Treiman, J.A., 1984, "The Rose Canyon Fault Zone, a Review and Analysis," California Division of Mines and Geology. Treiman, J.A., 1993, "The Rose Canyon Fault Zone, Southern California," California Division of Mines and Geology Open File Report 93-02. Wallace, R.E., 1968, "Notes of Stream Channel Offset by San Andreas Fault, Southern Coast Ranges, California," in Dickinson, U.R., and Grantz, A., eds., Proceedings of Conference of Geologic Problems on San Andreas Fault System, Stanford University Publications, Geological Sciences, Vol. IX, p. 6-21. Wells, D.L., and Coppersmith, Kevin J., 1994, "New Empirical Relationships among Magnitude, Rupture Length, Rupture Width, Rupture Area, and Surface Displacement," Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Volume 84, No. 4, pp. 974-1002. Weber, F.H., Jr., 1963, "Geology and Mineral Resources of San Diego County, California," California Division of Mines and Geology County Report 3. Wesnousky, S.G., 1986, "Earthquakes, Quaternary Faults and Seismic Hazard in California," Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 91, No. B12, pp. 12,587-12,631. Wiegand, J.W., 1970, "Evidence of San Diego Bay-Tijuana Fault," Association of Engineering and Geologists Bulletin, Volume 7, Nos. 1 and 2, Pages 107-121. Wood ward-Gizien ski and Associates, F. Beach Leighton and Associates, 1974, "Seismic Safety Study for the City of San Diego," Project No. 72-279 Yeats, R.S., Sieh, K.E., and Allen, C.R., 1996, "Geology of Earthquakes," Oxford University Press, 568 p. Youd, T. Leslie and Idriss, Izzat M., 1997, Proceeding of the NCEER Workshop on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils., National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, Technical Report NCEER-97-0022. Ziony, J.I., and Yerkes, R.F., 1985, "Evaluating Earthquake and Surface Faulting Potential," in Ziony, J.I., ed., Evaluating Earthquake Hazards in the Los Angeles Region - An Earth Science Perspective, U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1360, p. 43-91. 24 Allied Design Group - JWDA May 10. 2000 Proposed Pacific Bell Building Addition, Camino VidaRoble, Carlsbad, CA LAIV€RANDALL Project "0341-0-0066 Report ofGeotechnical Investigation FIGURES .inn 70341-0-0066 DATF 05/10/GD np FAA n F BEG 1 oI p tr-O £as REFERENCE: Tan, S.S, and Kennedy, M.P, 1996, Geologic Maps of the Northwestern part of San Diego County, California, CDMG OFR 96-02, Plate 2, Scale 1:24,000. LEGEND Qal Alluvium and Colluvium Qt 1 -4 Marine Terrace Deposits Ob Beach Deposits Tsa Santiago Formation (Tertiarty) LOCAL GEOLOGY SCALE 1"=24,000' 0 .5 1 I I I KILOMETERS Contact (dashed where approx. located, dotted where concealed) \5 Fault (dashed where approx. located, dotted where concealed: U, upthrown, D, downthrown) Strike and Dip of Bedding LAW/CRANDALL, FIGURE.: 2 -,x-^xv : - ~ "• •"^w/i^:i4(K«r,-../'::rf\ 'W- ,^^%^ll %^&;/• -•-^r^4-"-^>^ ii;^;;-i* A A .^ Q|;|!^t • ^Ff||' X .,V'' ,^f>^k:<fcl' ' S'8 J/'-'flf,sp'f a - jjr^'l/w ^^HvlfcV4 ,....^.®\HW-®^S^^ \vr ;/ M ^ Allied Design Group - JWDA May 10, 2000 Proposed Pacific Bell Building Addition, Camino Vida Roble, Carlsbad, CA LA\vCRAXD.4LL Project ~0341-0-0066 Report ofGeotechnical Investigation APPENDIX FIELD EXPLORATIONS AND LABORATORY TESTS Allied Design Group - JWDA May JO, 2000 Proposed Pacific Bell Building Addition, Camino VidaRoble, Carlsbad, CA L.wCRANDALL Project "0341-0-0066 Report ofGeotechnical Investigation APPENDIX FIELD EXPLORATIONS AND LABORATORY TESTS FIELD EXPLORATIONS The subsurface conditions beneath the site were explored by drilling four borings to depths of approximately 8 to 21 feet below the existing grade using 8-inch diameter hollow-stem auger drilling equipment at the locations shown on Figure 1. Boring 2 was terminated short of planned depths due to drilling refusal and relocated 3 feet to the southwest. Water was encountered at depth of 6 feet below the existing grade in Boring 3, The water probably represents a perched groundwater condition flowing down the adjacent slope on top of the bedrock. Groundwater or water seepage was not encountered in any other of our borings. Our field geologist logged the soils encountered, and obtained undisturbed and bulk samples for laboratory inspection and testing. The borings were backfilled with the excavated materials. The logs of the borings are presented in Figures A-1.1 through A-1.4; the depths at which relatively undisturbed samples were obtained are indicated to the left of the boring logs. The key to the boring logs is presented in Figure A-2.1. The relatively undisturbed samples were obtained using a "Crandall" sampler. The Crandall sampler is a brass-ring-lined tube with an inside diameter of 25/8 inches and an outside diameter of 3Vg inches. The number of blows required to drive the Crandall sampler 12 inches is indicated on the boring logs. The hammer used for the Crandall sampler weighed 140 pounds and a drop height of 30 inches was used. The soils are classified in the accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System described in Figure A-2.2. LABORATORY TESTS The field moisture content and dry density of the soils encountered were evaluated by performing tests on the undisturbed samples in accordance with ASTM D2216-92. The results of the tests are presented to the left of the boring logs. Direct shear tests were performed on four relatively undisturbed samples to estimate the strength of the soils. The tests were performed at after soaking to near-saturated moisture content and at Allied Design Group - JWDA May 10, 2000 Proposed Pacific Bell Building Addition, Camino VidaRoble, Carlsbad, CA lAWCRAND.tu. Project "0341-0-0066 Report ofGeotechnical Investigation various surcharge pressures. The yield-point values determined from the direct shear tests are presented in Figure A-3, Direct Shear Test Data. A confined consolidation test was performed in general accordance with ASTM D2435-90 on one relatively undisturbed soil sample to evaluate the compressibility of the soils. Water was added to the samples during the test to evaluate the effects of moisture on the soils. The results of the tests are presented on Figure A-4, Consolidation Test Data. An expansion index test was performed on one recompacted sample to evaluate the volume change of the clayey silt soils due to changes in moisture content. The tests were performed in accordance with ASTM Test Designation D4829-95. The sample was confined under a surcharge pressure of 144 pounds per square foot, soaked, and the resulting expansion was measured. The results of the expansion index test are presented on the right side of the boring logs. ^^ o^ X L) U UJ CD LLJ O a.o cra Q.o K LL OOoCN O in UJ1-<a CD ID OO6 500orv CDo—)INote: The log of subsurface conditions shown hereon applies only at the specific boring location and at the date indicated. 1It is not warranted to be representative of subsurface conditions at other locations and times. 1ELEVATION(ft.)205 - 200- 195 - 190- I fc^^J — -Q MOISTURE(% of dry wt.)23.1 26.6 30.2 29.6 20.6 20.6 DRY DENSITY{Ibs./cu. ft.)94 96 92 89 98 109 BLOW COUNT*(blows/ft.)30 54 33 38 64 82 for 11", | SAMPLE LOG.':••• BORING 1 DATE DRILLED: April 24, 2000 EQUIPMENT USED: 8" diameter hollow-stem auger ELEVATION: 208 *^«» iwv•$$$•jrW-a5$SA5$s^iWSi*W9"1i•9S8?vwvwvwwv>$$>VxVv$^vwV991 V9Vvyy1 vwvw•sX^?1 vww$- ^?w? I ML- CL ML .OG 6" Asphalt Concrete Paving 6" Aggregate BaseFILL CLAYEY SILT - some asphalt concrete debris, light brownish gray, medium dense, slightly moist (El = 74) some very fine SAND SANTIAGO FORMATION SILTSTONE - some Clay and very fine SAND, mottled and oxidized, light gray to light brownish gray, very dense less oxidized, moist, dense mostly light gray, very dense NOTE: Boring terminated at 21'. No water encountered. OF BORING A LAW/CRANDALL M^ FIGURE A-1.1 indicated. 1INote: The log of subsurface conditions shown hereon applies only at the specific boring location and at the dateIt is not warranted to be representative of subsurface conditions at other locations and times.ELEVATION(ft.)205 - 200- I Q~MOISTURE(% of dry wt.)17.1 18,7 DRY DENSITY(Ibs./cu. ft.)109 102 BLOW COUNT*(blows/ft.)37 52 B | SAMPLE LOG.•. BORING 2A DATE DRILLED: April 24, 2000 EQUIPMENT USED: 8" diameter hollow-stem auger ELEVATION: 207.5 III &f/-"ft$sio -o -o •) O O C L SM SC GW .OG 5" Asphalt Concrete Paving 7" Aggregate Base SILTY SAND - fine to coarse Sand, trace Clay, micaceous, dark brown, medium dense, moist COLLUVIUM CLAYEY SAND - fine to coarse Sand, trace fine Gravel, dark brown, medium dense, moist some fine to coarse Gravel, rock chips, oxidized, very dense GRAVEL - fine to coarse. Clayey Sand matrix, very dense NOTE: Boring terminated at 8'due to refusal on hard material. No water encountered. OF BORING A LAW/CRANDALL /M^ FIGURE A-1.2 •D0) (0O INote: The log of subsurface conditions shown hereon applies only at the specific boring location and at the date indIt is not warranted to be representative of subsurface conditions at other locations and times.ELEVATION(ft.}205 - 200 - 195 - 190- I I--T fc£Q MOISTURE{% of dry wt.)21.6 16.4 29.8 22.7 19.5 18.3 DRY DENSITY(Ibs./cu. ft.)101 107 93 101 100 105 BLOW COUNT*(blows/ft.)34 56 46 54 80 49 | SAMPLE LOG.*Jm|| 4 BORING 2B DATE DRILLED: April 24, 2000 EQUIPMENT USED: 8" diameter hollow-stem auger ELEVATION: 207.5 ^*i ' 1 < 1 1w1wnn^w<w111 L SM SM SP ML .OG 5" Asphalt Concrete Paving 7" Aggregate Base EiLLSILTY SAND - fine to coarse, micaceous, dark brown, medium dense, slightly moist SANTIAGO FORMATION SILTY SAND - fine Sand, trace Clay, weathered, light brownish gray, dense SAND - fine, some Gravel, light brownish gray, oxidized, dense, wet SILTSTONE - some Clay and very fine Sand, unweathered, light gray, mottled and oxidized, very dense NOTE: Boring terminated at 21 '. No water encountered. OF BORING A LAW/CRANDALL jl^ FIGURE A-1.3 •o *-cou ^ 0) re"D 0).C (D TJ C W o -i '^(0 ^0 CO to 's ~S5 S 0 _O rt i-u u<U JI = IQ ** Vtv Cffl O >- ."t^c -o 0 0tn o .£ a. "5- £a .£ CO ^ g 3q ja £ 3a3 w iZ •*- c ° ii-s «s s.1 sII S.S-LJ S ortJ *^t; T>3 £v> p ^ §(0 "-ra "o 5 11 a) wJI —1- *± (D O•z.ELEVATION(ft.)205 - 200- 195 - 190- XI r Q~ 5 _ • 10 • 1 Ci b ort^u -MOISTURE& of dry wt.)O~ 18.2 15,9 29.6 30.2 29.1 32.1 RY DENSITY[Ibs./cu. ft.)Q 104 102 92 92 89 89 *OW COUNT'(blows/ft.)_jm 26 55 53 50 53 56 O O_j LU _1 Q_ 5 < BORING 3 DATE DRILLED: April 24, 2000 EQUIPMENT USED: 8" diameter hollow-stem auger « ELEVATION: 206.5 ^I^K* K%Wi. KFy Lffi TIPKf%b^d • •"*****"vwRxx><KXX^ 565? H TO B&§HI AXXPSrW 4HFVWIKXXXF\ryv^Ivwl\/X/\/\<K8X8EXX>s^rxVx^rVVV" KS§ K\ 1 sc sc ML 5" Asphalt Concrete Paving 6" Aggregate Base EikLCLAYEY SAND - fine to coarse, some asphalt concrete debris, light gray to light brown, medium dense, moist COLLUVIUM CLAYEY SAND - fine to coarse, trace fine Gravel, light gray to light brownish gray, very dense, wet SANTIAGO FORMATION SILTSTONE - some Clay and very fine Sand, unweathered, light gray, mottled and slightly oxidized, very dense, slightly moist NOTE: Boring terminated at 21 '. Perched water encountered at 6'. LOG OF BORING A LAW/CRANDALL J», FIGURE A-1.4 • Crandall Sampler S No Recovery W\ Standard Penetration Sampler DO Bulk Sample -#200 = % Passing No. 200 Sieve LL = Atterberg Liquid Limit PI = Atterberg Plasticity Index El = Expansion Index TV = Torvane PP = Pocket Penetrometer Blow Count - Number of blows required to drive the Crandall or SPT sampler 12 inches using a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches. KEY TO BORINGS LAW/CRANDALL FIGURE A-2.1 MAJOR DIVISIONS GROUP SYMBOLS TfPICAL NAMES COARSE GRAINED SOILS (Mora than 50% ol material b LARGER than No. 200 sieve GRAVELS {Mora than 50% of coarse fraction b LARGER than th« No. 4 sieve size) SANDS (Mora than 50% ot coarse fraction is SMALLER than the No. 4 siew size) CLEAN GRAVELS (Uttta * no firm) OLOC GW Wei graded gravels, gravel - sand mixtures, littk or no fine*. GP Poorty graded grants or gravel - sand mixtures, IMe or no fines. GRAVELS WITH FINES {Appreciable amount ol fines) GM Sty graved, gravel - sand - sift mixtures. CLEAN SANDS (Uttle or no fines) SANDS WITH FINES (Appreciable amount of fines) GC Clayey gravels, gravel - sand - clay mixtures. SW Wei graded sands, gravelly sands, little or no tines. SP Poorly graded sands or gravelly sands, little or no fines. SM SiNy sands, sand • silt mixtures. SO Clayey sands, sand - day mixtures. ML Inorganic srtts and very fine sands, rock flour, silly or clayey fine sands or clayey silts with slight plasticity. FINE GRAINED SOILS (More than 50% ot material is SMALLER than No. 200 sieve size) SILTS AND CLAYS (Liquid limit LESS than 50)a Inorganic clays of low to medium plasticity, gravelly days, sandy days, sidy clays, lean clays. SILTS AND CLAYS (Liquid limit GREATER than 50) OL Organic silts and organic sifty clays o! low plasticity. Inorganic silts, micaceous or diatomaceous fine sandy or sily soils, elastic sils. CH Inorganic days of high plasticity, fat clays. OH Organic days of medium to high plasticity, organic silts. HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS Pt Peat and other highly organic soils. BOUNDARY Cl ASSlFICATlONfi; Soils possessing characteristics of Iwo groups are designated by combinations of group symbols. PARTICLE SIZE LIMITS SILT OR CLAY SAND Fne Medium Coarse GRAVEL fine Coarse COBBLES BOULDERS No.200 No.40 No. 10 No 4 3/4* U.S. STANDARD SIEVE SIZE 12' UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM Reference: The Unified Soil Classification System, Corps ol Engineers, U.S. Army Technical Memorandum No. 3-357, Vol. 1. March, 1953 {Revised April, 1960)LAW/CRANDALL FIGURE A-2-I SHEAR STRENGTH in Pounds per Square Foot 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 o2B@6.5 1000 -3@3.5- OOu_ Sn>3«rCO Si 2000 Q. •oc3 OQ_ UJ K =>CO (OUJ KQ. UJoa:<xoDC3CO 3000 4000 5000 6000 2B@6.5 -©- BORING NUMBERS SAMPLE DEPTH (FT.) 3@3,5 O KEY: Samples tested after soaking to a moisture content near saturation -Natural soils -Fill soils DIRECT SHEAR TEST DATA LAW/CRANDALL FIGURE A - 3 LOAD IN KIPS PER SQUARE FOOT 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 Boring 3 at 3.5' FILL-CLAYEY SAND 0.07 NOTE: Water added to samples after consolidation under a load of 1.8 kips per square foot. CONSOLIDATION TEST DATA LAW/CRANDALL FIGURE A-4 City of Carlsbad Building Department DEMOLITION ASBESTOS CERTIFICATION ADDRESS: USE OF BUILDING TO BE DEMOLISHED: SQUARE FEET {/ ^7^ Qf~. X NUMBER OF STORIES PROPERTY OWNER: ADDRESS:?7~-PHONE APPLICANT: ADDRESS:PHON Section 19827.5 of California Health and Safety Code states in part: 'A demolition permit shall not be issued by any city ...as to any building or other structure except upon receipt from the permit applicant of a copy of each written asbestos notification regarding the building that has been required to be submitted to the United States Environmental Protection Agency or to a designated state agency, or both, pursuant to Part 61 of Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, or the successor to that part. The permit may be issued without the applicant submitting a copy of the written notification if the applicant declares that the notification is not applicable to the scheduled demolition project." As applicant for a demolition permit in the City of Carlsbad, I certify that; I have read the excerpt from Section 19827.5 of the Health and Safety Code provided above; the information I have provided on this form is true and correct; and 1 further certify the following: On the attached pages are copies of all written asbestos notifications regarding the above referenced building that are required to be submitted to the United States Environmental Protection Agency or to Part 61 of Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, or successor to that part. (x"T I declare that the written asbestos notification is not applicable to the scheduled ;molition project. Applicant' s Si iAword\forms\buildmg\dernoliliori permil requirements. doc Date REV August 9, 2000 1635 Faraday Avenue - Carlsbad. CA 92008-7314 * (76O) 602-270O - FAX (76O) 6O2-8560 R. J/DAUM CONSTRUCTION COMPANY GENERAL CONTRACTORS LICENSE NO. 127760 11886 SOUTH PRAIRIE AVENUE • P.O. BOX G • HAWTHORNE, CALIFORNIA 90251 TELEPHONE: 310/644-5581 • FAX NO.: 310/679-1215 April 7,1999 To Whom It May Concern: Adam Downey is authorized to obtain Building Permits for R, J. Daum Construction Company. Sincerely, Harold I. Perong, President Allied Design Group ARCHITECTURE / PLANNING / INTERIOR DESIGN Allied Design Group 2359 Fourth Avenue, Suite 201 San Diego, CA 92101 Phone: (619) 233-6777 Fax: (619) 233-3868 E-mail: jwda@jwdainc.com TO: City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Ave. Carlsbad, CA. 92008-7314 ATTN: Mike Peterson - Senior Building Inspector We are transmitting enclosed the following material: DATE: 3/8/01 JOB PacBell NAME: 2175 Cam. Vida Roble JOB NO. 1740 Phase I Diskette Prints Other COPIES 3 2 1 / / DATE 3/8/01 it (i DESCRIPTION Revised Drawings Structural Gates. Soils Report ff^gf*?^/ A/S&5&/W/ /*• £>£s/d£ST?a</ s*S#6<s&^ £.. REMARKS See below |x| For approval | | For Your Use | j For your information I | As requested | x | Distribution | | Record GENERAL COMMENTS: Dear Mike, As per your direction I am sending this to your attention. These plans will be for the demo. Of the trailers and construction of the vault cover only. Phase II will be submitted later With all of the other portions of the work. As we discussed the first Plan Ck. No. 00-3481 Will be deleted and this submittal will assume the second Plan Ck No. 00-4822. The Plan Ck. No. 010-586 will remain the same for the Phase II. Thank you for your assistance in this Matter. VIA: I I Mail fxl Courier I I FedEx Hand delivered Modem Other BY:Sincerely, Robert Royce __ JAN-02-2001 TUE 09:44 AH FAX NO. 310 679 1215 P. 01 A£S8D, CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCt&S?, PRODUCERWood-CutaMGB Insurance BroXers Lieanea #067926314192 Franklin Ave. , Suite 200 Tuatin CA 92780-7044 Phone: 714-505-7000 Faxi 714-573-1770 INSURED Rj Daum Construction CompanyA Nevada Corporation11386 Prairie Ave.Hawthorne CA 90251i GATE (MMWJO/YYf 12/29/00 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE INSURER*; General Security Insurance Co. INSURERS: INSURER C: INSURER 0: INSURERS: COVERAGES THE POUC4C3 OF INSURANCE USTSD BELOW HAVE BEEN «3uCD TO THE INSURED IWMEOABO« FOR THE POUCY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTVvrTWSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT. TERM Oft CONOfTJON Of ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITM RE»P1CT TO WHtCH THIS CEHTtfCATS, WAY BE ISSUED OR POLICIES. AGORCSATg LMT8 SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BV PAID CUMS. IS? A TYPE OF MSURANCE GENERAL LIABILITY ^j COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIAWLfTYK-"~) , i J CLAIMS MADE | X ) OCCUR GENT AOGREGATe LWT APPLIES PER: ipOucYJFlj^ j ILOC |MrroMO«J- LIABILITY ANY AUTO ALL OWNED AUTOS H SCHEDULED AUTOS HIRED AUTOS NOI^OWNEO AUTOS GARAGE UAfitUTY n ANY AUTO EXCESS UA8*JTV_^aOCCUR ! CLAIMS MADEi -J dDEDUCTIBLE RETENTION $ WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS1 LIABILITY OTHER POLICY NUMBER - 22N32000033 oA^JSoc^ri6 01/01/01 POLICY S»t*ATIG«DATi imnoopm 01/01/02 UMTTS EACH OCCURRCNCC Fift£ DAMAGE (Any OMfo) MEOeXPiAtra^iw^) PERSONAL A ADV INJURY aeNERALAaoReoATE PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGO COueiNED SINGLE UM(T BODILY INJURY s?aar PROPERTY DAMAGE (PtKacoMni) AUTO ONLY • EA ACCIOEKT AUTO ONLY: EAACC s s s $ • s s s • s s s AGG I EACH OCCURRENCE AG€RE&iTE X TORYLIMrfs U!H-6R EJ_ EACH ACCIDENT t s s s s si, 000, 000 E.t. DISEASE -fiAIMPlOYEti t 1, QDO, 000 E.L. DISEASE -POLICY LIMIT si, 000, 000 DESCRIPTION OF OP«ATION3/LOCATION3/Ve>«Cl***XCUISiONS ADDED BY eNDORSCMENT/SRECIAL PROVISIONS Cancellation notice is amended to give 10 days for nonpayment of premium or nonreporting of payroll. ra: Licanae #127760 CERTIFICATE HOLDER N i ADDITIONAL INSURED; INSURER LETTffc CANCELLATION Contractor's Board P.O. Box 260C Sacramento CJ ACORO 24-« (7*7} CONTOQ2 State License 0 I 95826 SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED FOUCltS (Jt CANCELLED BEFORE TNE EXPAATION DATE THeREOP. THE ISSUING WSuRfiR WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL .30 DAYS WRTTTEN NOTtCC TO THE CERTIFICATE MOLQER NAMED TO T«tE LEFT, BUT FAK.UR6 TO DO SO SMALL IUPG&S NO oeUCATIQN OR UABHjTY OF ANY KIND UPON THE INSURER. FTS AGCNTS OR RE?RESENTAp46\ , f^-—fi>f. £Jaataa' fi< GUCmann /Su ** — *- — _^ ©ACORD CORPORATION 1988 o Ul * *S uj9tr> Oo zzQ19< COO m 3S S OD 3*< < _ 13o a > i- ±1