The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2175 CHESTNUT AVE; ; CB020230; PermitTl-2*2-2002 Job Address: Permit Type: Parcel No: Valuation: Occupancy Group: # Dwelling Units: Bedrooms: Project Title: City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 Residential Permit Permit No: CB020230 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 2175 CHESTNUT AV CBAD RESDNTL 1670804300 $168,851.00 Sub Type: RAD Status: ISSUED Lot#: 0 Applied: 01/22/2002 Construction Type: VN Entered By: JM Reference #: Plan Approved: 08/22/2002 0 Structure Type: Issued: 08/22/2002 0 Bathrooms: 0 Inspect Area: RF VANVOOREN -2ND STORY RAD Orig PC#: 1571 SF - DECK 552 SF ELEC 200 AMP UPGRADE Plan Check#: Applicant: VANVOOREN PAUL&CAROL 4984 EUCALYPTUS LN CARLSBAD CA 92008 Owner: VANVOOREN PAUL&CAROL 4984 EUCALYPTUS LN CARLSBAD CA 92008 Total Fees: $1,592.37 Total Payments To Date: $1,592.37 Balance Due:$0.00 Building Permit Add'l Building Permit Fee Plan Check Add'l Plan Check Fee Plan Check Discount Strong Motion Fee Park in Lieu Fee Park Fee LFM Fee Bridge Fee Other Bridge Fee BTD #2 Fee BTD #3 Fee Renewal Fee Add'l Renewal Fee Other Building Fee Pot. Water Con. Fee Meter Size Add'l Pot. Water Con. Fee Reel. Water Con. Fee $759.08 Meter Size $0.00 Add'l Reel. Water Con. Fee $493.40 Meter Fee $0.00 SDCWA Fee $0.00 CFD Payoff Fee $16.89 PFF $0.00 PFF (CFD Fund) $0.00 License Tax $0.00 License Tax (CFD Fund) $0.00 Traffic Impact Fee $0.00 Traffic Impact (CFD Fund) $0.00 Sidewalk Fee $0.00 PLUMBING TOTAL $0.00 ELECTRICAL TOTAL $0.00 MECHANICAL TOTAL $0.00 Housing Impact Fee $0.00 Housing InLieu Fee Master Drainage Fee $0.00 Sewer Fee $0.00 Additional Fees TOTAL PERMIT FEES $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $203.00 $35.00 $85.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,592.37 Inspector: FINAL AP Date: NOTICE: Please take NOTICE thit approval of your project includes the "Imposition" of fees', dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as lees/exactions." You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project. NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired. PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008 1. PROJECT INFORMATION FOR OFFICE USE ONLY PLAN CHECK Plan Ck. Deposi Validated By_ Date / dress (include Bldg/Suite #)"Business Name (at this address) a Nfa.Legal Description Lot No.Subdivision Name/Numbe'UnifNfa.onits Assessor's Parcel #Existing Use Proposed Use Description of Work 1T)0>\/ > CONTACT PERSON (if different from i SO. FT. as 7 i #of Stories 0; # of Bedrooms c 5~r<2 * - ) # of Bathrooms 7 Mame Address 3. APPUCANT D Contractor D Agent for Contractor Owner Name 4. PROPERTY OWNER Address City1 State/Zip Telephone # Address City State/Zip Telephone #Name 5. CONTRACTOR ^COMPANYNAME (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law [Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars [$5001). Name State License # Address License Class City State/Zip City Business License # Telephone # Designer Name State License # Address City State/Zip Telephone 6. WORKERS'COMPENSATION . v ; - •• • f , ; •••.•*•" ' " ; : : •:'..." —:" - .-: '•:-"'". :; ••••;• ;.;.• ;. .; ; ....,.,,,••. Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: n I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. |~| I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Insurance Company Policy No. Expiration Date (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS [$100] OR LESS) Q CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), in addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees. SIGNATURE DATE I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: |~l I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). «| I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). L3 I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason: 1. I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. O YES C]NO 2. I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. 3. I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): 4. I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): 5. I will provide some of the work^b«*4have.F ontracted (r^recp the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type of work): . 1 ft 4 / DATE /'ROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE _ COMPLETE THIS SECTION FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMITS ONLY Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? [H YES Q NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? C] YES d NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? [~l YES fj NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. 8<;Hj^iNlSfRVeT^^^ ...." vT:'"". •;: : .' '" . ":."--. '.- ,.......-'.• .. .; .,..:• • * • I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097(i) Civil Code). LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the CitV of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is noJjaMWuenced within 180 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such pe/mit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is comfnenceyfoi/£|J£riod/of 180/d$(ys (Section 106.4.4 Uniform Building Code). APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE WHITE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 02/12/2004 Permit* CB020230 Title: VANVOOREN -2ND STORY RAD Description: 1571 SF - DECK 552 SF ELEC 200 AMP UPGRADE Inspector Assignment: PY 2175 CHESTNUT AV Lot 0 Type: RESDNTL Sub Type: RAD Job Address: Suite: Location: APPLICANT VANVOOREN PAUL&CAROL Owner: VANVOOREN PAUL&CAROL Remarks: Phone: 7605358050 Inspector: Total Time: CD Description 19 Final Structural 29 Final Plumbing 39 Final Electrical 49 Final Mechanical Requested By: PAUL Entered By: CHRISTINE Act ^Comment Associated PCRs/CVs PCR02332 ISSUED VANVOOREN RES-CHANGE STEEL TO; WOOD FRAMING-ADD 150 SF 2ND FLR-MO^ Inspection History Date Description Act Insp Comments 09/02/2003 89 Final Combo CO PD 08/29/2003 89 Final Combo CO RB STOP, SEE ATTACHED NOTICE 08/20/2003 39 Final Electrical PA PY EMR 04/07/2003 82 Drywall/Ext Lath/Gas Test AP PY 04/04/2003 17 Interior Lath/Drywall CA PY 04/04/2003 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall CA PY 03/28/2003 27 Shower Pan/Roman Tubs AP PY 03/27/2003 16 Insulation AP TP 03/24/2003 17 Interior Lath/Drywall WC PY 03/24/2003 84 Rough Combo AP PY 02/04/2003 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers AP PY 01/28/2003 83 Roof Sheathing/Ext Shear AP PY 01/27/2003 13 Shear Panels/HD's CO PY 12/23/2002 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding NR PD 12/18/2002 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding CA RF 12/17/2002 15 Roof/Reroof PA JE SHEAR WALL FOOTING RRF DRAINS ROOF NAILING ONLY DUE TO INCLEMENT WEATHER 'PLANS & City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 09/02/2003 Permit* CB020230 Title: VANVOOREN -2ND STORY RAD Description: 1571 SF - DECK 552 SF ELEC 200 AMP UPGRADE Inspector Assignment: PY Sub Type: RAD 2175 CHESTNUT AV Lot 0 Type: RESDNTL Job Address: Suite: Location: APPLICANT VANVOOREN PAUL&CAROL Owner: VANVOOREN PAUL&CAROL Remarks: Phone: 7605358050 Inspector Total Time:Requested By: PAUL Entered By: ROBIN CD Description 19 Final Structural 29 Final Plumbing 39 Final Electrical 49 Final Mechanical Act Comment Associated PCRs/CVs PCR02332 ISSUED VANVOOREN RES-CHANGE STEEL TO; WOOD FRAMING-ADD 150 SF 2ND FLR- Inspection History Date 08/20/2003 04/07/2003 04/04/2003 04/04/2003 03/28/2003 03/27/2003 03/24/2003 03/24/2003 02/04/2003 01/28/2003 01/27/2003 12/23/2002 12/18/2002 12/17/2002 Description 39 82 17 18 27 16 17 84 11 83 13 14 14 15 Final Electrical Drywall/Ext Lath/Gas Test Interior Lath/Drywall Exterior Lath/Drywall Shower Pan/Roman Tubs Insulation Interior Lath/Drywall Rough Combo Ftg/Foundation/Piers Roof Sheathing/Ext Shear Shear Panels/HD's Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Roof/Reroof Act PA AP CA CA AP AP we AP AP AP CO NR CA PA Insp PY PY PY PY PY TP PY PY PY PY PY PD RF JE Comments EMR SHEAR WALL FOOTING RRF DRAINS ROOF NAILING ONLY Dl 10/22/2002 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers AP RF CARD NOT ON SITE FOR TRUSS INSPECTION NEED PAPERWORK FOR STEEL COLUMN CHANGE NOTICECITY OF CARLSBAD (760) 502-2700 BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1635 FARADAY AVENUE DATE f-- 1 ~ & 7 TIME LOCATION NO&PERMIT NO 'X ^C'W tffr. & A fJ FOR INSPECTION CALL (760) 602-2725. RE/INSPECTION FEE DUE? FOR FURThfeR INFORMATION, CONTACT (^ 0 2 " J ^ D fa YES PHONE BUILDING INSPECTOR CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 08/29/2003 Permit* CB020230 Title: VANVOOREN -2ND STORY RAD Description: 1571 SF - DECK 552 SF ELEC 200 AMP UPGRADE Inspector Assignment: PY 2175 CHESTNUT AV Lot 0 Type:RESDNTL Sub Type: RAD Job Address: Suite: Location: APPLICANT VANVOOREN PAUL&CAROL Owner: VANVOOREN PAUL&CAROL Remarks: Phone: 7605358050 Inspector: Total Time:Requested By: PAUL Entered By: ROBIN CD Description 19 Final Structural 29 Final Plumbing 39 Final Electrical 49 Final Mechanical Act Comment Associated PCRs/CVs PCR02332 ISSUED VANVOOREN RES-CHANGE STEEL TO; WOOD FRAMING-ADD 150 SF 2ND FLR-MO^ Inspection History Comments EMR Date 08/20/2003 04/07/2003 04/04/2003 04/04/2003 03/28/2003 03/27/2003 03/24/2003 03/24/2003 02/04/2003 01/28/2003 01/27/2003 12/23/2002 12/18/2002 12/17/2002 Description 39 82 17 18 27 16 17 84 11 83 13 14 14 15 Final Electrical Drywall/Ext Lath/Gas Test Interior Lath/Drywall Exterior Lath/Drywall Shower Pan/Roman Tubs Insulation Interior Lath/Drywall Rough Combo Ftg/Foundation/Piers Roof Sheathing/Ext Shear Shear Panels/HD's Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Roof/Reroof Act PA AP CA CA AP AP we AP AP AP CO NR CA PA lns| PY PY PY PY PY TP PY PY PY PY PY PD RF JE 10/22/2002 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers AP RF SHEAR WALL FOOTING RRF DRAINS ROOF NAILING ONLY DUE TO INCLEMENT WEATHER 'PLANS & CARD NOT ON SITE FOR TRUSS INSPECTION NEED PAPERWORK FOR STEEL COLUMN CHANGE CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE NOTI(i E (760) 602-2700 1635 FARADAY AVENUE TIME LOCATION 7 S' C- PERMIT NO. / ^ C -x C > V" FOR INSPECTION CALL (760) 602-2725. RE-INSPECTION FEE DUE? FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT YES BUILDING INSPECTOR CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 08/20/2003 Permit* CB020230 Title: VANVOOREN -2ND STORY RAD Description: 1571 SF - DECK 552 SF ELEC 200 AMP UPGRADE Inspector Assignment: PY Sub Type: RAD 2175 CHESTNUT AV Lot 0 Type: RESDNTL Job Address: Suite: Location: APPLICANT VANVOOREN PAUL&CAROL Owner: VANVOOREN PAUL&CAROL Remarks: EMR Phone: 7605358050 Inspector: Total Time:Requested By: PAUL Entered By: CHRISTINE CD Description 39 Final Electrical Comment Associated PCRs/CVs PCR02332 ISSUED VANVOOREN RES-CHANGE STEEL TO; WOOD FRAMING-ADD 150 SF 2ND FLR-MO^ Inspection History CommentsDate 04/07/2003 04/04/2003 04/04/2003 03/28/2003 03/27/2003 03/24/2003 03/24/2003 02/04/2003 01/28/2003 01/27/2003 12/23/2002 12/18/2002 12/17/2002 10/22/2002 10/22/2002 10/21/2002 10/18/2002 Description 82 17 18 27 16 17 84 11 83 13 14 14 15 11 21 81 11 Drywall/Ext Lath/Gas Test Interior Lath/Drywall Exterior Lath/Drywall Shower Pan/Roman Tubs Insulation Interior Lath/Drywall Rough Combo Ftg/Foundation/Piers Roof Sheathing/Ext Shear Shear Panels/HD's Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Roof/Reroof Ftg/Foundation/Piers Underground/Under Floor Underground Combo Ftg/Foundation/Piers Act AP CA CA AP AP we AP AP AP CO NR CA PA AP AP CA CO Insp PY PY PY PY TP PY PY PY PY PY PD RF JE RF RF RF RF SHEAR WALL FOOTING RRF DRAINS ROOF NAILING ONLY DUE TO INCLEMENT WEATHER "PLANS & CARD NOT ON SITE FOR TRUSS INSPECTION NEED PAPERWORK FOR STEEL COLUMN CHANGE MISSING #4 REBAR AT TOP City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 10/22/2002 Permit# CB020230 Title: VANVOOREN -2ND STORY RAD Description: 1571 SF - DECK 552 SF Inspector Assignment: RF 2175 CHESTNUT AV Lot 0 Type:RESDNTL Sub Type: RAD Job Address: Suite: Location: APPLICANT VANVOOREN PAUL&CAROL Owner: VANVOOREN PAUL&CAROL Remarks: AM PLEASE Total Time: Phone: 7605940950 Inspector: Requested By: DAVID Entered By: CHRISTINE CD Description 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 21 Underground/Under Floor Act Comments Af I T Associated PCRs/CVs Inspection History Date Description Act Insp Comments 10/18/2002 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers CO RF MISSING #4 REBAR AT TOP Carl Schmidt Inspection P. o! Box 178403 San Diego. CA 92177-8403 Phone (619) 855-9252 SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT: ^h I/Q& ^£1^ ftJj JV d <2^ c>£. JQB START: "7-' & ° ADDRESS: ^ ^-^ &£-&* 7~ ^ ^ T~ JOB STOP: CITY: G£j-/f£cLd PERMITS: C&&2--~Z3O PLAN FILE #: TYPE OF OBSERVATIONS: MASONRY _ REINFORCED CONCRETE _ FIELD WELDING _ EPOXY_J< PRESTRESSED CONCRETE _ SHOP WELDING _ BOLTING _ REINFORCING STEEL _ FIREPROOFING SAMPLES: NUMBER: _ TYPE: Materials/Design Mix Numbers/PSI: /f-337^, /]-C/S~l 5 • **>-, 3"" 2.^7 9 Inspection Date: /-2.*}-O3 REPORT s Tcy // /t^c, ^y r-e- 6cu^ c/c ui & /s / ^ 7~o- — -- - r\ C/O e . <~><e->-Jz. /'^ r x> ^g c^ y--^ c/"~* . 6> /<> WORK INSPECTED CONFORMS WITH APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED cSc^/Q/7- ^*/Z project Billing Information: Print Name Certification* Phone: ( ) Fax: ( ) Inspector's Signature Carl Schmidt Inspection P. 6. Box 178403 San Diego. CA 92177-8403 Phone (619) 855-9252 SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT // C ' / I 'V QC> r^-^\ K&£ f Cf^^C-t JOB START: ' 'PROJECT: ADDRESS: X / 7 S~ CAgj-/^^'?" JOB STOP: CITY: C/<^ISkc^d PERMIT #: C^lf £?Z- 2.3O PLAN FILE #: TYPE OF OBSERVATIONS: MASONRY REINFORCED CONCRETE FIELD WELDING PRESTRESSED CONCRETE SHOP WELDING BOLTING REINFORCING STEEL FIREPROOFING SAMPLES: NUMBER: TYPE: Materials/Design Mix Numbers/PSI: A ~"3 & Z SV**-? ,£ S On S 6TT~ 3^ O (&£> ^ ~Z~?°f / 2.ZInspection Date: . REPORT ^ -e- 7" J"~ J ^ __ WORK INSPECTED CONFORMS WITH APPROVED PIANS AND SPECIFICATIONS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED - 6</2- Project Billing Information: Print Name Certification* Phone: Fax:( Inspector's Signature Carf Schmidt Inspection P. O. Box 178403 Son Diego. CA 92177-8403 Phone (619) 855-9252 PROJECT: ADDRESS" 2- / 7j"" CITY: r SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT Si T~^7 d PERMIT #:£> JOB START: JOB STOP: PLAN FILE #: 3 '. 6Q. TYPE OF OBSERVATIONS: MASONRY _ REINFORCED CONCRETE _ FIELD WELDING _ EPQXY_J< PRESTRESSED CONCRETE _ SHOP WELDING _ BOLTING _ REINFORCING STEEL _ FIREPROOFING SAMPLES: NUMBER:TYPE: Materials/Design Mix Numbers/PSI: Inspection Date: JT^T s jf S S"2~?CLI REPORT c.<j o J2-X/J'C c.gr- 6 C//c/S S - 3 7~o $ $-3 , 7"g; /A i'c///"Z, •€ c/g c/r // tft 7" /' WORK INSPECTED CONFORMS WITH APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED '7 Jc.A/^/Q/7" ^VZ. Project Billing Information: Print Name Certification* ra.**/ l/d ^ 1/6 a /* -? ^ _ Phone: ( ) Fax:( j Inspector's Signature ENGINEERING I DESIGN GROUP•Q GEOTECHNICAL. CIVIL, STRUCTURAL & ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANTS FOR RESIDENTIAL & COMMERCIAL CONSTRUCTION 2121 Montiel Road, San Marcos, California 92069 • (760) 839-7302 • Fax: (760) 480-7477 • E-mail: ENGDG@aol.com FOOTING OBSERVATION SUMMARY Date: Project Name: Address: October 16, 2002 Van Vooren Additions 2175 Chestnut Avenue, City of Carlsbad, CA Footing Location: Continuous and Pier Building Footings Referenced Report: Permit No: Code: 1997U.B.C. "Limited Geotechnical Investigation For Proposed New Van Vooren Additions, To Be Located At 2175 Chestnut Avenue, City of Carlsbad, California" Prepared by Engineering Design Group Dated May 20, 2002 Project No. 012570-1. Observation of Summary: initials Initials initials A representative of E.D.G. observed on-site soil conditions. Soil conditions for the proposed footings are substantially in conformance with those assumed in the 1997 Uniform Building Code. A representative of E.D.G. observed and measured footing excavation depth/width for the proposed footings. Footing excavations extend to proper depth and bearing strata, and are in general conformance with 1997 Uniform Building Code. A representative of E.D.G. measured footing setback from slope face. The setback was in general accordance with the recommendations of the project geotechnical report. Notes to Superintendent/Foreman 1. Footing/caisson excavations should be cleaned of loose debris and thoroughly moisj§rjed just prior to placing concrete. 4<"^- ±* vt>" ~~ ' 2. In the event of a site change subsequent to our footing/caisson observation and prior to concrete placement (i.e., heavy rain, etc.), we should be contacted to perform additional site observations. Notes to Building Inspector 1.Soil compaction test results, including depth of fill, relative compaction, bearing values, and soil expansion index test results are contained in the As-Graded Geotechnical Report provided at the completion of grading (IF APPLICABJ. (ZL Retu/esentati (/ •INEERING DESIGN GROUP Date Job No.012570-1 \\Main\file on main\Forms\4 FRM\2001\012570-1, VAN VOOREN, 2175 CHESTNUT, CARLSBAD - FTG OBS.wpd EsGil Corporation In ^Partnership witfi. government for 'Bu.iCding Safety DATE: 08/2O/02 a AEELJCANT JURISDICTION: Carlsbad a PLAN REVIEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 02-230 SET: III PROJECT ADDRESS: 2175 Chestnut Ave. PROJECT NAME: Room Addition/Remodel/Deck for Van Vooren Residence The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. X] The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed*for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. , , , The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: 2<] Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS: 1) Attach truss layout (enclosed) to sheet S5 of City's set. By: Ray Fuller Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA n MB D EJ Q PC 08/13/02 tmsmH.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 4 (858)560-1468 4 Fax (858) 560-1576 EsGil Corporation In Pa.rtnersfi.ip with government for DATE: 07/01/02 Q APEt3£ANT U(<JURIsr} JURISDICTION: Carlsbad a PDtfjREVlEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 02-230 SET: II PROJECT ADDRESS: 2175 Chestnut Ave. PROJECT NAME: Room Addition/Remodel/Deck for Van Vooren Residence The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. 2<J The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. [XI The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Paul & Carol Van Vooren 4984 Eucalyptus Ave. Carlsbad, Ca. 92008 I | Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. XI Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Paul & Carol Van Vooren Telephone #: (760 729-7227 Date contacted:?Mo2- (by:Vy ) t^-k) Fax #: Mail ^Telephone*/ Fax In Person REMARKS: By: Ray Fuller Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC 06/24/02 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 4 San Diego, California 92123 + (858)560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad O2-23O O7/O1/02 RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 2175 Chestnut Ave. DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 06/24/02 REVIEWED BY: Ray Fuller PLAN CHECK NO.: O2-230 SET: II DATE RECHECK COMPLETED: 07/O1/02 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. A. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. B. The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews. The original correction number has been given for your reference. In case you did not keep a copy of the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding corrections. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items. C. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? QYes QNo Carlsbad O2-230 07/O1/02 The items listed below are from the previous list. These remaining items have not been adequately addressed. The remarks in bold are to emphasize the remaining problem. 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92009, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 2. Plans shall be signed and sealed by the California state licensed engineer or architect responsible for their preparation. Specify expiration date of license. Final sets. 6. Show locations of permanently wired smoke detectors with battery backup: Centrally located in corridor or area giving access to sleeping rooms. Bedrooms downstairs and upstairs. Could not locate smoke detectors at top of stairs on E2 and outside master bedroom on E1. When sleeping rooms are upstairs, at the upper level in close proximity to the stair. 7. Glazing in the following locations should be of safety glazing material in accordance with Section 2406.4 : The notes were added and there for correction could be ok but you have noted tempered glass at some of the required areas i.e. on A4 at master bath area a nd at other required areas i.e. windows at the stairwell and windows within 24" of doors. Although notes provided will cover this correction it becomes expensive if not clearly shown on the plans now and found not in compliance at frame or final inspections. Fixed and sliding panels of sliding door assemblies and panels in swinging doors other than wardrobe doors. Doors and enclosures for hot tubs, whirlpools, saunas, steam rooms, bathtubs and showers and in any portion of a building wall enclosing these compartments where the bottom exposed edge of the glazing is less than 60 inches above a standing surface and drain inlet. Fixed or operable panels adjacent to a door where the nearest exposed edge of the glazing is within a 24-inch arc of either vertical edge of the door in a closed position and where the bottom exposed edge of the glazing is less than 60 inches above the walking surface. Carlsbad 02-230 07/01/02 Walls enclosing stairway landings or within 5 feet of the bottom and top of stairways where the bottom edge of the glass is less than 60 inches above a walking surface. Stairwell. Fixed or operable panels adjacent to a door where the nearest exposed edge of the glazing is within a 24-inch arc of either vertical edge of the door in a closed position and where the bottom exposed edge of the glazing is less than 60 inches above the walking surface. 10. Specify maximum 1" drop for out swinging doors i.e. at breakfast room. Should either specify typical or note or all exterior doors shown that are out swinging. 22. Provide a copy of the project soil report prepared by a California licensed architect or civil engineer. The plans do not appear to follow recommendations. Please review detail on last page of soils report i.e. minimum 4 #4's total (2 at top and 2 at bottom). The footing depth's are to be around 4 % ft deep to reach competent soil. Please have soils engineer review plans for compliance for recommendations as required on sheet 8 and provided letter as noted below. 27. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soils report are properly incorporated into the construction documents (when required by the soil report). Response was not required. Page 8 of the soils report does require the structural plans to be reviewed . 29. If required, show size, embedment and location of hold down anchors on foundation plan. Section 106.3.3. Detail retro fit hold downs i.e. embedment length, size all thread etc. Could not determine why special inspection was not noted for hold down type 3? 30. Truss calculations need to reflect opening for skylight and all truss to truss connections must be shown on the plans. Could not locate truss to truss connections. 31. Provide truss details and truss calculations for this project. Specify truss identification numbers on the plans. Either place truss numbers on the plans or truss layouts to be stamped and signed by truss engineer and the engineer of record to place a review stamp on truss layout showing he or she has reviewed these trusses. Truss numbers are to be on the structural sheets of the plans. 32. Per UBC Section 2321.4, provide the following note on the plans if trusses are used: Could not locate this note on the plans as underlined below.. "Each truss shall be legibly branded, marked or otherwise have permanently affixed thereto the following information located within 2 feet of the center of the span on the face of the bottom chord: Identity of the company manufacturing the truss. The design load. The spacing of the trusses." Carlsbad 02-230 O7/01/02 • To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. • Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. • Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: Yes Q No Q • The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Ray Fuller at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. EsGil Corporation In Partnership with, government for 'Bu.iCding Safety DATE: 02/05/02 Q APPLICANT JURISDICTION: Carlsbad a PLAN REVIEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 02-230 SET: I PROJECT ADDRESS: 2175 Chestnut Ave. PROJECT NAME: Room Addition/Remodel/Deck for Van Vooren Residence The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. 2<J The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Paul & Carol Van Vooren 4984 Eucalyptus Ave. Carlsbad, Ca. 92008 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. XI Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Paul & Carol Van Vooren Telephone #: (760 ) 729-7227 Dateeeftee&:2-e>-02 (by:ibvvH.) Fax #: Mail./ TelephoneiX Fax In Person REMARKS: By: Ray Fuller Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA D MB n EJ D PC 01/25/02 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 *• (858)560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad 02-230 O2/05/O2 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES PLAN CHECK NO.: 02-230 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 2175 Chestnut Ave. FLOOR AREA: Addition 1575 Deck 552 REMARKS: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: 01/22/02 DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED: 02/05/02 STORIES: 2 HEIGHT: 21 ft per UBC DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 01/25/02> PLAN REVIEWER: Ray Fuller FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Present California law mandates that residential construction comply with the 1998 edition of the California Building Code (Title 24), which adopts the following model codes: 1997 UBC, 1997 UPC, 1997 UMC and 1996 NEC (all effective 7/1/99). The above regulations apply to residential construction, regardless of the code editions adopted by ordinance. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations! Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e.. plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked UP list when you submit the revised plans. Carlsbad O2-230 O2/05/O2 • PLANS 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92009, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to trreir Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. > NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 2. Plans, specifications and calculations shall be signed and sealed by the California state licensed engineer or architect responsible for their preparation. Specify expiration date of license. Plans need to be wet stamped and signed and structural sheets were not stamped and signed. 3. Notes in ink need to be on vellums etc so as a permanent part of plans. See S3 for example where old and new footing designators have been changed. 4. On the cover sheet of the plans, specify any items requiring special inspection, in a format similar to that shown below. Section 106.3.2. • REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS In addition to the regular inspections, the following checked items will also require Special Inspection in accordance with Sec. 1701 of the Uniform Building Code. ITEM REQUIRED? REMARKS • SOILS COMPLIANCE PRIOR If soils report requires this FOUNDATION INSPECTION • FIELD WELDING Per detail 4/S6 • EXPANSION/EPOXY ANCHORS Retro fit details on S3 5. When special inspection is required, the architect or engineer of record shall prepare an inspection program which shall be submitted to the building official for approval prior to issuance of the building permit. Please review Section 106.3.5. Please complete the attached form. Carlsbad 02-230 02/05/02 • FIRE PROTECTION 6. Show locations of permanently wired smoke detectors with battery backup: a) Centrally located in corridor or area giving access to sleeping rooms. Bedrooms downstairs and upstairs.. b) When sleeping rooms are upstairs, at the upper level in close proximity to the stair. • GENERAL RESIDENTIAL REQUIREMENTS 7. Glazing in the following locations should be of safety glazing material in accordance with Section 2406.4 (see exceptions): a) Fixed and sliding panels of sliding door assemblies and panels in swinging doors other than wardrobe doors. b) Doors and enclosures for hot tubs, whirlpools, saunas, steam rooms, bathtubs and showers and in any portion of a building wall enclosing these compartments where the bottom exposed edge of the glazing* is less than 60 inches above a standing surface and drain inlet. c) Fixed or operable panels adjacent to a door where the nearest exposed edge of the glazing is within a 24-inch arc of either vertical edge of the door in a closed position and where the bottom exposed edge of the glazing is less than 60 inches above the walking surface. d) Walls enclosing stairway landings or within 5 feet of the bottom and top of stairways where the bottom edge of the glass is less than 60 inches above a walking surface. Stairwell. e) Fixed or operable panels adjacent to a door where the nearest exposed edge of the glazing is within a 24-inch arc of either vertical edge of the door in a closed position and where the bottom exposed edge of the glazing is less than 60 inches above the walking surface. • EXITS, STAIRWAYS, AND RAILINGS 8. Handrails (Section 1003.3.3.6): a) The handgrip portion of all handrails shall be not less than 1-1/4 inches nor more than 2 inches in cross-sectional dimension. Handrails projecting from walls shall have at least 1-1/2 inches between the wall and the handrail. b) Ends of handrails shall be returned or shall have rounded terminations or bends. 9. The walls and soffits of the enclosed usable space under interior stairs shall be protected on the enclosed side as required for one hour fire-resistive construction. Section 1003.3.3.9. 10. Specify maximum 1" drop for out swinging doors i.e. at breakfast room. Carlsbad 02-230 02/05/02 • ROOFING & DECKS 11. Specify on the plans the following information for the roof materials, per Section 106.3.3: a) Manufacturer's name. b) Product name/number. c) ICBO approval number, or equal. 12. Provide skylight details to show compliance with Sections 2409 and 2603, or specify on the plans the following information for the skylight(s), per Section 106.3.3: a) Plate glass must be tempered and must showing screening as exceeds 12 ft in height at 1 point. 13. Show the required ventilation for attics. The minimum vent area is 1/150 of attic area (or 1/300 of attic area if at least 50% of the required vent is ableast 3 feet above eave vents or cornice vents). Show area required and area provided. Section 1505.3. 14. Specify deck water proof material and minimum %" per foot fall. 15. Specify how obtaining the required minimum % inch per foot deck slope for drainage i.e. ripping, sleepers etc. If ripping, note maximum taper cut and calculations to reflect this and if sleepers detail attachment to floor joist. Section 1506.1. 16. Show roof drains, overflows and sizes. Specify minimum 3" diameter pipe if runs horizontal and 2" if vertical. If using scuppers note minimum 4". Sections 1506.2 and 1506.3. • GARAGE 17. Garage requires one-hour fire protection on the garage side of walls and ceiling common to the dwelling. Table 3-B, Section 302.4. 18. All elements supporting floor above garage, including walls/beams/columns supporting floor joists, must have one-hour fire-resistive protection on the garage side. Section 302.2. 19. Show a self-closing door, either 1-3/8" solid core or a listed 20 minute assembly, for openings between garage and dwelling if not existing. Section 302.4. 20. Provide an 18" raised platform for water heater if not existing. UMC Section 303.1.3, UPC Section 510.1. Carlsbad O2-230 O2/O5/O2 21. If new door: Doors may open into the garage only if the floor or landing in the garage is not more than one inch lower than the door threshold. Section 1003.3.1.6. • FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS 22. Provide a copy of the project soil report prepared by a California licensed architect or civil engineer. The report shall include foundation design recommendations based on the engineer's findings and shall comply with UBC Section 1804. City requires soils report when over 1000 sg ft and over 1 story. 23. Investigate the potential for seismically induced soil liquefaction and soil instability in Seismic Zones 3 and 4. Section 1804.5 24. In Seismic Zone 4, each site shall be assigned a near-source factor. Identify this value in the soils report and on the plans. Section 1629.4.2. > 25. Note on the plan the soils classification, whether or not the soil is expansive and note the allowable bearing value. Section 106.3.3. 26. The soils engineer recommended that he/she review the foundation excavations. Note on the foundation plan that "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building Department foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the building official in writing that: a) The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report, b) The utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and c) The foundation excavations, the soils expansive characteristics and bearing capacity conform to the soils report." 27. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soils report are properly incorporated into the construction documents (when required by the soil report). 28. If hold downs are required, note on plan that hold down anchors must be tied in place prior to foundation inspection. Section 108.5.2. 29. If required, show size, embedment and location of hold down anchors on foundation plan. Section 106.3.3. Detail retro fit hold downs i.e. embedment length, size all thread etc. • FRAMING 30. Truss calculations need to reflect opening for skylight and all truss to truss connections must be shown on the plans. Carlsbad O2-230 O2/05/O2 31. Provide truss details and truss calculations for this project. Specify truss identification numbers on the plans. Either place truss numbers on the plans or truss layouts to be stamped and signed by truss engineer and the engineer of record to place a review stamp on truss layout showing he or she has reviewed these trusses. 32. Per UBC Section 2321.4, provide the following note on the plans if trusses are used: "Each truss shall be legibly branded, marked or otherwise have permanently affixed thereto the following information located within 2 feet of the center of the span on the face of the bottom chord: a) Identity of the company manufacturing the truss. b) The design load. c) The spacing of the trusses." 33. Still could not determine how overhangs were structurally, supported i.e. as shown on 1/S8. Overhangs to be checked for wind i.e. per Table 16-H item 3 (2.3 upward plus .5 for roof eaves). 34. Lengths of shear walls do not appear to match calculations. Please have engineer of record review plans for compliance with recommendations. • MECHANICAL (UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE) 35. Note on the plans that the FAU closet or alcove must be 12 inches wider than the furnace or furnaces being installed. UMC Section 304.7. 36. Note that passageway to the attic furnace shall be unobstructed not less than 30" high and 30" wide and have continuous solid flooring not less than 24 inches wide, not more than 20 feet in length through the attic. Section 307.3.2, UMC. 37. Show permanent electrical outlet and lighting fixture controlled by a switch for furnace located in attic or underfloor space. Sections 306.3 and 306.4, UMC. 38. Specify on the plans the following information for the fireplace(s), per Section 106.3.3: a) Manufacturer's name. b) Model name/number. c) ICBO approval number, or equal. d) Show height of chimney above roof per I.C.B.O. approval or UBC Table 31-B. e) Note on the plans that approved spark arrestors shall be installed on all chimneys. UBC, Section 3102.3.8. f) Fireplace must be listed for exterior use where shown at deck area. 39. Provide dryer vent to outside. The maximum length is 14 feet with two 90-degree elbows. UMC, Section 504.3.2. Carlsbad O2-230 O2/05/O2 • ELECTRICAL (NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE) 40. Show on the plan the amperage of the electrical service, the location of the service panel and the location of any sub-panels. If service is over 200 amps, submit single line diagram, panel schedule and load calculations. 41. Note on the plans that bathroom receptacle outlets shall be supplied by a minimum of one 20-ampere branch circuit. Such circuits shall have no other outlets. This circuit may serve more than one bathroom. NEC Art. 210-52(d). • ENERGY CONSERVATION 42. Cloth backed duct tape is no longer permitted to be used as the sole connection for mechanical ducting. Note on the plans that duct tape, as a minimum, meeting the requirements of UL181, 181A, or 181B, shall be used, or additional duct attachment devices such as tie wraps or mastic will be required forestalling mechanical ducting. 43. Detail or note on the plans: "The return air plenum serving the mechanical equipment must be fully ducted from the equipment to the conditioned space. Drop ceilings, wall cavities and equipment platforms may not be used as plenums." 44. All sheets of the latest CF-1R form must be imprinted onto the plans (sheets 1 of 3, 2 of 3 and 3 of 3 must be included). 45. Specify on the building plans all of the mandatory energy conservation requirements as listed on the enclosure titled, "Mandatory Measures Checklist". • CITY OF CARLSBAD REQUIREMENTS 46. All new residential buildings, including additions, require a soils report. An update letter is required if the report is more than 3 years old. If a room addition is less than 1000 sq. ft. in area and only one story, then a soils report is not required. 47. Nails for shear transfer connection (using A35's, etc.) may not be driven parallel to the flanges of TJI's (i.e., along the sides), per city policy, unless specific written approval from Trus-Joist Macmillan is first obtained. Details or notes on the plans should make this clear. Nails may be driven perpendicular to TJI flanges. • To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. Carlsbad O2-230 02/05/02 • Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. • Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: Yes a No Q The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Ray Fuller at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. Carlsbad O2-23O O2/05/O2 City of Carlsbad Building Department BUILDING DEPARTMENT NOTICE OF REQUIREMENT FOR SPECIAL INSPECTION Do Not Remove From Plans Plan Check No. O2-230 Job Address or Legal Description 2175 Chestnut Ave. You are hereby notified that in addition to the inspection of construction provided by the Building Department, an approved Registered Special Inspector is required to provide continuous inspection during the performance of the phases of construction indicated on the reverse side of this sheet. * -TI The Registered Special Inspector shall be approved by the City of Carlsbad Building Department prior to the issuance of the building permit. Special Inspectors having a current certification from the City of San Diego, Los Angeles, or ICBO are approved as Special Inspectors for the type of construction for which they are certified. The inspections by a Special Inspector do not change the requirements for inspections by personnel of the City of Carlsbad building department. The inspections by a Special Inspector are in addition to the inspections normally required by the County Building Code. The Special Inspector is not authorized to inspect and approve any work other than that for which he/she is specifically assigned to inspect. The Special Inspector is not authorized to accept alternate materials, structural changes, or any requests for plan changes. The Special Inspector is required to submit written reports to the City of Carlsbad building department of all work that he/she inspected and approved. The final inspection approval will not be given until all Special Inspection reports have been received and approved by the City of Carlsbad building department. Please submit the names of the inspectors who will perform the special inspections on each of the items indicated on the reverse side of this sheet. (over) '*' Carlsbad O2-23O O2/05/02 SPECIAL INSPECTION PROGRAM ADDRESS OR LEGAL DESCRIPTION: £1.7^7 PLAN CHECK NUMBER: ^2-2.^7 OWNER'S NAME:&vf> \, as the owner, or agent of the owner (contractors may not employ the special inspector), certify that I, or the architect/engineer of record, will be responsible for employing the special inspector(s) as-required by Uniform Building Code (UBC) Section 1701 .1 for the construction project locatd at he sjte-listed above. UBC Section 106.3.5. Signed I, as the engineer/architect of record, certify that I have prepared the following special inspection program as required by UBC Section 106.3.5 for the construction project located at the site listed above. Englnxi'i/ArchltKI'i S«al « Signal *• Htr. g special inspection: I Soils Compliance Prior to Foundation Inspection ; Structural Concrete Over 2500 PSI Q Prestressed Concrete Q Structural Masonry Q Designer Specified Field Welding HigVStrength Bolting Expansion/Epoxy Anchors Sprayed-On Fireproofing Other ' 2. Name(s) of individual(s) or firm(s) responsible for the special inspections listed above: A. B. c. 3. Duties of the special inspectors for the work listed above: A. B. c. Special inspectors shall check in with the City and present their credentials for approval prior to beginning work on the job site. Carlsbad 02-23O /O2/O5/O2 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PREPARED BY: Ray Fuller BUILDING ADDRESS: 2175 Chestnut Ave. PLAN CHECK NO.: O2-230 DATE: O2/O5/O2 BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R3 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN BUILDING PORTION Addition Deck Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE Jurisdiction Code AREA ( Sq. Ft.) 1517 552 CB RIHn Pprmif FPP hv OrHinanrp ^P Valuation Multiplier Per City Est. By Ordinance Reg. Mod. VALUE ($) , 168,851 x 168,851 $759.08 Plan Check Fee by Ordinance Type of Review: Repetitive Fee Repeats Complete Review D Other Hourly Structural Only Hour* Esgil Plan Review Fee $493.40 $425.08 Comments: Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue.doc PLANNING/ENGINEERING APPROVALS PERMIT NUMBER CB DATE ADDRESS RESIDENTIAL ADDITION MINOR «$10,000.00) TENANT IMPROVEMENT PLAZA CAMINO REAL CARLSBAD COMPANY STORES VILLAGE FAIRE COMPLETE OFFICE BUILDING OTHER PLANNER DATE ENGINEER DATE Docs/Misforms/Planning Engineering Approvals Plan Check No. Planner APN: PLANNING DEPARTMENT BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST Address Phone (760) 602- CFD (in/out) #_Date of participation: Circle One t Project Density: Facilities Management Zone: Remaining net dev acres: DU>A( (For non-residential development: Type of land used created by this permit: _ ) Legend: 1X1 Item Complete I I Item Incomplete - Needs your action Environmental Review Required: YES _ NO _ TYPE _ DATE OF COMPLETION: •; _ __ ' Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: . .. • Discretionary Action Required: APPROVAL/RESO. NO. PROJECT NO. YES NO TYPE DATE OTHER RELATED CASES: Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: ' I I l~l Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance•* " -i? Project site located in Coastal Zone? YES CA Coastal Commission Authority? YES If California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact'them at - 7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite 103, San Diego CA 92108-4402; (61 9) 767-2370 Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt): Coastal Permit Determination Form already completed? YES N0_ If NO, complete Coastal Permit Determination Form now. Coastal Permit Determination Log #: Follow-Up Actions: 1) Stamp Building Plans as "Exempt" or "Coasj0J<sFermit Required" (at minimum Floor Plans). 2) Complete Coastal Permit DeterminatiopjsJs&g as needed. Inclusionary Housing Fee required***"1^ YES NO (Effective date of Inclusionaj^wousing Ordinance - May 21, 1993.) Data Entry Complet^f YES NO (A/P/Ds, Activity/Maintenance, enter CB#, toolbar, Screens, Housing Fees, Construct Housing Y/N, Enter FeCUPDATE!) ' H:\ADMIN\COUMreR\BldgPlnchkRevChklst Rev 9/01 Site Plan: • i ^^^ ™ 11 I l~1 1. Provide a fully dimensional site plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow, property lines, '"> -easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right- of-way width, dimensional setbacks and existing^topographical lines (including all side and rear yard slopes). . * ' ,, -- i D CH 2. Provide legal description of property and assessor's parcel number. Policy 44 - Neighborhood Architectural Design Guidelines S D D 1 - Applicability: YES * NO tl D D 2. Project complies YES V NO V- n5" Zoning: jf3?D D 1. Setbacks: ' Front: Required Interior Side: Required Street Side: Required Rear: Required Top of slope: Required FT EH EH 2. Accessory structure setbacks: ' Front: Require^ Interior Side: Reatffred Street Side: ^XRequired Rear: S^^ Required Structure sepaj^ffjon: Required IfPl I PI 3. Lot Coverage: Required /HDD 4. Height: . Required JFl EH EH 5. Parking: Spaces Required [ (breakdown by uses for Residential Guest Spaces Required **U Shown *^ ^"^ Ap. fa Shown ^i. ^ "^•n,^. Shown .^. / 3 . O Shown *>^> ' -1" Shown -~" ~~ X^"^ Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown t*~{(fo ^~~^& 1t> 31'**JU Shown ** ' *7 "L.'t^ Shown ^^ commercial and industrial projects required) Shown I lEHEH Additional Comments ' ' •' t . t OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER H:\ADMIN\COUNTER\BldgPlnchkRevChklst Rev 9/01 ENGINEERING IDESIGN GROUP GEOTECHKAL CIVIL STRUCTURAL 5 ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANTS FOR RESIDENTIAL t COMMERCIAL COHSTBUCTION U 2121 Montiel Road, San Marcos, California 92069 • (760) 839-7302 • Fax: (760) 480-7477 • E-mail: ENGDG@aol.com LIMITED GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR PROPOSED NEW VAN VOOREN ADDITIONS, TOBEyLOCATEDAT2175 CHESTNUT AVENUE, CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA EDG Project No. 012570-1 May 20, 2002 PREPARED FOR: Paul Van Vooren 4984 Eucalyptus Lane Carlsbad, CA 92008 TABLE OF CONTENTS ,-3 . Page SCOPE . . . 1 r~? - ' • , SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION 7 fi FIELD INVESTIGATION . . . . ; . . . 1 SUBSOIL CONDITIONS ...... . 1 j| GROUND WATER^ . . . 2 r, LIQUEFACTION . . . . . . . 2 s CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS . , 3 GENERAL .- 3 FOUNDATIONS 3 CONCRETE SLABS ON GRADE 4 RETAINING WALLS . :. .;...;,......:.,..; 6 SURFACE DRAINAGE 7 CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION AND TESTING 8 MISCELLANEOUS ,-. -...--'. . 9 FIGURES Site Vicinity Map Figure No. 1 Site Location Map ...."". .~ Figure No. 2 Approximate Location of Test Pits Figure No. 3 Test Pit Logs Figures No. 4-5 APPENDICES . . References Appendix A General Earthwork and Grading Specifications Appendix B Testing Procedures Appendix C Underpin Details Appendix D 'SCOPE This report gives the results of our limited geotechnical investigation for the property located at 2175 Chestnut Avenue, City of Carlsbad, California. (See Figure No. 1, "Site Vicinity Map", and Figure No. 2, "Site Location Map"). The scope of our work, conducted on-site to date, has included a visual reconnaissance of the property and surrounding areas, a limited subsurface investigation of the property in the area of proposed additions, field analysis, soil testing and preparation of this report presenting our findings, conclusions, and recommendations. SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION . For the purposes of this report the front of the property is assumed to face west. The subject property consists of a rectangular lot located east of Chestnut Avenue in the City of Carlsbad, California. The site is bordered to the north, south and east by custom developed residences, and to the west by Chestnut Avenue. The overall topography consists of hilly terrain. The subject site is relatively flat, with a six foot high retaining wall along the northern property line. Presently, the site is developed with a single story residence with slab on grade flooring system. Based upon our conversations with the project owners and our limited review of the preliminary project plans, it is our understanding that the proposed new improvements will consist of the following; >• Design and construction of a new second story addition over the existing residence (generally within existing footprint) FIELD INVESTIGATION ^ Ourfield investigation of the property, conducted May 2,2002, consisted of a site reconnaissance, site field measurements, observation of existing conditions on-site and on adjacent sites, and a limited subsurface investigation of soil conditions. Our subsurface investigation consisted of visual observation of two exploratory test pits and logging of soil types encountered. The locations of the test pits are given in Figure No. 3, "Site Plan, Approximate Location of Test Pits". Logs of the exploratory test pit excavations are presented in Figures No. 4-5, "Test Pit Logs". SUBSOIL CONDITIONS Materials consisting of fill underlain by sandstone were encountered during our subsurface investigation of the site. Soil types within our test pit excavations are described as follows: Fill: Fill soils associated with the grading of the lot tract were found to -extend to Van Vooren Residence ~ ' 'Page No. 1 2175 Chestnut Avenue, Carlsbad, California Job No. 012570 ENGINEERING DESIGN GROUP GEOTECHNICAL, CIVIL, STRUCTURAL & ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANTS depths of approximately 4 feet below adjacent grade in our test pit excavations. Fill materials consist of dark to light brown, dry to slightly moist, medium dense, silty sand. Fill materials are not considered suitable for the support of structures in their present state. Existing fills classify as SW-SM according to the Unified Classification System, and based on visual observation generally possess potentials for expansion in the low range. Sandstone Sandstone material was found to underlie the topsoil/fill material within the test pit excavations. Sandstone materials consisted of rust brown, moist, dense, silty sandstone. Sandstone materials are considered suitable for the support of structures and structural improvements, provided the recommendations of this report are followed. Sandstone materials classify as SW-SM according to the Unified Classification System, and based on visual observation and our experience possess potentials for expansion in the low range. For detailed logs of soil types encountered in our test pit excavations, as well as a depiction of our test pits locations, please see Figure No. 3, "Approximate Location of Test Pits", and Figures No. 4-5, "Test Pits Logs". GROUND WATER Ground water was not encountered during our subsurface investigation of the site. Ground water is not anticipated to be a significant concern to the project provided the recommendations of this report are followed. LIQUEFACTION It is our opinion that the site could be subjected to moderate to severe ground shaking in the event of a major earthquake along any of the faults in the Southern California region. However, the seismic risk at this site is not significantly greater than that of the surrounding developed area. Liquefaction of cohesionless soils can be caused by strong vibratory motion due to earthquakes. Research and historical data indicate that loose, granular soils underlain by a near-surface ground water table are most susceptible to liquefaction, while the stability of most silty clays and clays is not adversely affected by vibratory motion. Because of the dense nature of the soil materials underlying the site and the lack of near surface water, the potential for liquefaction or seismically-induced dynamic settlement at the site is considered low. The effects of seismic shaking can be reduced by adhering to the most recent edition of the Uniform Building Code and current design parameters of the Structural Engineers Association of California. Van Vooren Residence Page No. 2 2175 Chestnut Avenue, Carlsbad, California . Job No. 012570 ENGINEERING DESIGN GROUP GEOTECHNICAL, CIVIL, STRUCTURAL & ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANTS CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GENERAL In general, it is our opinion that the proposed construction, as described herein, is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint, provided the recommendations of this report and generally accepted construction practices are followed. In areas of structural or cosmetically sensitive improvements, fill soil found to mantle the site will require mitigation. At the time of this report it is our understanding new additions will be made above the existing single story residence with a new foundation system to support new second loads. Existing foundations where measured were found to be approximately 12-15 inches wide and 12 inches deep, and were founded into fill material. New foundations will require deepening through the fill materials, and embedded a minimum of 6 inches into competent sandstone materials (approximately 4.5 foot deep). Embedment should be confirmed by a representative of Engineering Design Group prior to placement of foundation steel. FOUNDATIONS The following design parameters may be utilized; '-•-•-. 1. Footings bearing in competent formational materials or compacted fill may be designed utilizing maximum allowable soils pressure of 2,000 psf. 2. Seismic Design Parameters: Seismic Zone Factor Soil Profile Type (Table 16-J) Near Source Distance (Distance to Closest Active Fault Seismic Source Type : (Table 16-U) .- 4 sd 20.0km Rose Canyon • • '/' -'•: ••• B ' Bearing values may be increased by 33% when considering wind, seismic, or other short duration loadings. Van Vooren Residence 2175 Chestnut Avenue, Carlsbad, California Page No. 3 Job No. 012570 ENGINEERING DESIGN GROUP GEOTECHNICAL, CIVIL, STRUCTURAL & ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANTS The following parameters should be used as a minimum, for designing footing width and depth below lowest adjacent grade: No. of Floors Supported 1 • '•••••:. -2 • • , ••••3-.- . • ;Minimum Footing Width 15 inches 15 inches 18 inches "Minimum Footing Depth Below Lowest Adjacent Grade 18 inches 18 inches 24 inches *The above depths are provided as minimum standards. Footing depths will necessitate deepening into competent formational profiles, anticipated to be 48-54 inches below adjacent grade. All footings founded into formational sandstone should be reinforced with a minimum of two #4 bars at the top and two #4 bars at the bottom (3 inches above the ground). For footings over 30 inches in depth, additional reinforcement, and possibly a stemwall system will be necessary. This detail should be reviewed on a case by case basis by our office prior to construction. I 7. All isolated spread footings should be designed utilizing the above given bearing values and footing depths, and be reinforced with a minimum of #4 bars at 12 inches o.c. in each direction (3 inches above the ground). Isolated spread footings should have a minimum width of 24 inches and deepened as described above. -• For footings adjacent to slopes, a minimum 13 feet horizontal setback in formational material or properly compacted fill should be maintained. A setback measurement should be taken at the horizontal distance from the bottom of the footing to slope daylight. Where this condition can not be met it should be brought to the attention of the Engineering Design Group for review. All excavations should be performed in general accordance with the contents of this report, applicable codes, OSHA requirements and applicable city and/or county standards. All foundation subgrade soils and footings shall be pre-moistened a minimum of 18 inches in depth prior to the pouring of concrete. CONCRETE SLABS ON GRADE No new slabs are proposed for the additions proposed. Where new slabs become part of the scope the following design parameters should be utilized as minimums, and mitigative grading should be conducted. The following'parameters are provided for concrete requirements: 1. Concrete slabs on grade of the building should have a minimum thickness of 4 inches (5 Van Vooren Residence 2175 Chestnut Avenue, Carlsbad, California Page No. 4 Job No. 012570 ENGINEERING DESIGN GROUP GEOTECHNICAL. CIVIL STRUCTURAL & ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANTS inches at garage and driveway locations)and should be reinforced with #3 bars at 18 inches o.c. placed at the midpoint of the slab. All concrete shall be poured per the following: Slump: Between 3 and 4 inches maximum Aggregate Size: 3/4 - 1 inch Air Content: 5 to 8 percent Moisture retarding additive in concrete at moisture sensitive areas. Water to cement Ratio - 0.5 maximum 2. All required fills used, to support slabs, should be placed in accordance with the grading section of this report and the attached Appendix B, and compacted to 90 percent Modified Proctor Density, ASTM D-1557. 3. A uniform layer of 4 inches of coarse sand is recommended under the slab in order to more uniformly support the slab, help distribute loads to the soils beneath the slab, and act as a capillary break. Coarse sand material should have an Sand Equivalent (S.E.) Greater than 50, and be washed clean of fine materials. In moisture sensitive areas, a visqueen layer (10 mil) should be placed mid-height in the sand bed to act as a vapor retarder. Sand should be rounded to avoid puncture of visqueen vapor retarder. 4. Adequate control joints should be installed to control the unavoidable cracking of concrete that takes place when undergoing its natural shrinkage during curing.- The control joints should be well located to direct unavoidable slab cracking to areas that are desirable by the designer. At a minimum joints should be spaced every 225 s.f. of slab area. 5. All subgrade soils to receive concrete flatwork are to be pre-soaked to 2 percent over optimum moisture content to a depth of 18 inches. 6. Brittle floor finishes placed directly on slab on grade floors may crack if concrete is not adequately cured prior to installing the finish or if there is minor slab movement. To minimize potential damage to movement sensitive flooring, we recommend the use of slip sheeting techniques (linoleum type) which allows for foundation and slab movement without transmitting this movement to the floor finishes. 7. Where new driveways are proposed as a minimum driveway subgrade should be excavated to a depth of 12 inches below proposed subgrade, scarified to a depth of 12 inches, moisture conditioned and recompacted. 8. Exterior concrete flatwork and driveway slabs, due to the nature of concrete hydration and minor subgrade soil movement, are subject to normal minor concrete cracking. To minimize expected concrete cracking, the following may be implemented: Concrete slump should not exceed 4 inches. Concrete should be poured during "cool" (40 - 65 degrees) weather if possible. If Van Vooren Residence Page No. 5 2175 Chestnut Avenue, Carlsbad, California Job No. 012570 ENGINEERING DESIGN GROUP GEOTECHNICAL, CIVIL, STRUCTURAL & ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANTS concrete is poured in hotter weather, a set retarding additive should be included in the mix, and the slump kept to a minimum. Concrete subgrade should be pre-soaked prior to the pouring of concrete. The level of pre-soaking should be a minimum of 2% over optimum moisture to a depth of 18 inches. Concrete may be poured with a 10 inch deep thickened edge. Where concrete flatwork is poured along the top of a slope, a footing should be excavated along the outside edge to achieve a minimum of 7 feet distance to daylight. Concrete should be constructed with tooled joints or sawcuts (1 inch deep) creating concrete sections no larger than 225 square feet. For sidewalks, the maximum run between joints should not exceed 5 feet. For rectangular shapes of concrete, the ratio of length to width should generally not exceed 0.6 (i.e., 5 ft. long by 3,ft. wide). Joints should be cut at expected points of concrete shrinkage (such as male corners), with diagonal reinforcement placed in accordance with industry standards. Drainage adjacent to concrete flatwork should direct water away from the improvement. Concrete subgrade should be sloped and directed to the collective drainage system, such that water is not trapped below the The recommendations set forth herein are intended to reduce cosmetic nuisance cracking. The project concrete contractor is ultimately responsible for concrete quality and performance, and should pursue a cost-benefit analysis of these recommendations, and other options available in the industry, prior to the pouring of concrete. RETAINING WALLS Retaining walls are not anticipated as part of the proposed construction. Retaining walls up to 6 feet may be designed and constructed in accordance with the following recommendations and minimum design parameters: 1. Retaining wall footings should be designed in accordance with the allowable bearing criteria given in the "Foundations" section of this report, and should maintain minimum footing depths outlined in "Foundation" section of this report. 2. Unrestrained cantilever retaining walls should be designed using an active equivalent fluid pressure of 35 pcf. This assumes that granular, free draining material with low potential for expansion (E.I. <50) will be used for backfill, and that the backfill surface will be level. Where soil with potential for expansion are not very low (E.I. > 20) a new active fluid pressure will be provided by the project soils engineer. Backfill materials should be Van Vooren Residence Page No. 6 2175 Chestnut Avenue, Carlsbad, California Job No. 012570 ENGINEERING DESIGN GROUP GEOTECHNICAL, CIVIL, STRUCTURAL & ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANTS 1 considered prior to the design of the retaining walls to ensure accurate detailing, sloping backfill, the following parameters may be utilized: For Backfill Sloping Condition Active Fluid Pressure 2:7 Slope 50pcf 15:7 Slope 65 pcf Any other surcharge loadings shall be analyzed in addition to the above values. 3. If the tops of retaining walls are restrained from movement, they should be designed for an additional uniform soil pressure of 7XH psf, where H is the height of the wall in feet. 4. Passive soil resistance may be calculated using an equivalent fluid pressure of 300 pcf. This value assumes that the soil being utilized to resist passive pressures, extends horizontally 2.5 times the height of the passive pressure wedge of the soil. Where the horizontal distance of the available passive pressure wedge is less than 2.5 times the height of the soil, the passive pressure value must be reduced by the percent reduction in available horizontal length. 5. A coefficient of friction of 0.35 between the soil and concretejootings may be utilized to resist lateral loads in addition to the passive earth pressures above. 6. Retaining walls should be braced and monitored during compaction. If this cannot be accomplished, the compactive effort should .be included as a surcharge load when designing the wall. '" . 7. All walls shall be provided with adequate back drainage to relieve hydrostatic pressure, and be designed in accordance with the minimum standards contained in the "Retaining Wall Drainage Detail", Appendix B. 8. Retaining wall backfill should be placed and compacted in accordance with the "Earthwork" section of this report. Backfill shall consist of soil with.a very low expansion potential, granular, free draining material. SURFACE DRAINAGE Adequate drainage precautions at this site are imperative and will play a critical role on the future performance of the dwelling and improvements. Under no circumstances should water be allowed to pond against or adjacent to foundation walls, or tops of slopes. The ground surface surrounding proposed improvements should be relatively impervious in nature, and slope to drain away from the structure in all directions, with a minimum slope of 2% for a horizontal distance of 7 feet (where Van Vooren Residence 2175 Chestnut Avenue, Carlsbad, California Page No. 7 Job No. 012570 ENGINEERING DESIGN GROUP GEOTECHNICAL, CIVIL, STRUCTURAL & ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANTS possible). Area drains or surface swales should then be provided to accommodate runoff and avoid any ponding of water. Roof gutters and downspouts shall be installed on the new and existing structures and tightlined to the area drain system. All drains should be kept clean and unclogged, including gutters and downspouts. Area drains should be kept free of debris to allow for proper drainage. During periods of heavy rain, the performance of all drainage systems should be inspected. Problems such as gullying or ponding should be corrected as soon as possible. Any leakage from sources such as water lines should also be repaired as soon as possible. In addition, irrigation of planter areas, lawns, or other vegetation, located adjacent to the foundation or exterior flat work improvements, should be strictly controlled or avoided. CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION AND TESTING The recommendations provided in this report are based on subsurface conditions disclosed by our investigation of the project area. Interpolated subsurface conditions should be verified in the field during construction. The following items shall be conducted prior/during construction by a representative of Engineering Design Group in order to verify compliance with the geotechnical and civil engineering recommendations provided herein, as applicable. The project structural and geotechnical engineers may upgrade any condition as deemed necessary during the development of the proposed improvement(s). 1. Attendance of a pre-grade/construction meeting prior to the start of work. 2. - Review of final approved structural plans prior to the start of work, for compliance.with geotechnical recommendations. 3. Testing of any fill placed, including retaining wall backfill and utility trenches. 4. Observation of footing excavations prior to steel placement. 5. Field observation of any "field change" condition involving soils. 6. Walk through of firial drainage detailing prior to final approval. The project soils engineer may at their discretion deepen footings or locally recommend additional steel reinforcement to upgrade any condition as deemed necessary during site observations. Engineering Design Group shall, prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy, issue in writing that the above inspections have been conducted by a representative of their firm, and the design considerations of the project soils report have been met. The field inspection protocol specified herein is considered the minimum necessary for Engineering Design Group to have exercised "due diligence" in the soils engineering design aspect of this building. Engineering Design Group assumes no liability for structures constructed utilizing this report not meeting this protocol. Van Vooren Residence Page No. 8 2175 Chestnut Avenue, Carlsbad, California Job No. 012570 ENGINEERING DESIGN GROUP GEOTECHNICAL. CIVIL, STRUCTURAL & ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANTS Before commencement of grading the Engineering Design Group will require a separate contract for quality control observation and testing. Engineering Design Group requires a minimum of 48 hours notice to mobilize onsite for field observation and testing. MISCELLANEOUS It must be noted that no structure or slab should be. expected to remain totally free of cracks and minor signs of cosmetic distress. The flexible nature of wood and steel structures allows them to respond to movements resulting from minor unavoidable settlement of fill or natural soils, the swelling of clay soils, or the motions induced from seismic activity. All of the above can induce movement that frequently results in cosmetic cracking of brittle wall surfaces, such as stucco or interior plaster or interior brittle slab finishes. Data for this report was derived from surface observations at the site, knowledge of local conditions, and a visual observation of the soils exposed in the exploratory test pits. The recommendations in this report are based on our experience in conjunction with the limited soils exposed at this site and neighboring sites. We believe that this information gives an acceptable degree of reliability for anticipating the behavior of the proposed structure; however, our recommendations are professional opinions and cannot control nature, nor can they assure the soils profiles beneath or adjacent to those observed. Therefore, no warranties of the accuracy of these recommendations, beyond the limits of the obtained data, is herein expressed or impjied. This report is based on the investigation at the described site and on the specific anticipated construction as stated herein. If either of these conditions is changed, the results would also most likely change. Man-made or natural changes in the conditions of a property can occur over a period of time. In addition, changes in requirements due to state of the art knowledge and/or legislation, are rapidly occurring. As a result, the findings of this report may become invalid due to these changes. Therefore, this report for the specific site, is subject to review and not considered valid after a period of one year, or if conditions as stated above are altered. It is the responsibility of the owner or his representative to ensure that the information in this report be incorporated into the plans and/or specifications and construction of the project. It is advisable that a contractor familiar with construction details typically used to deal with the local subsoil and seismic conditions, be retained to build the structure. Van Vooren Residence Page No. 9 2175 Chestnut Avenue, Carlsbad, California • Job No. 012570 ENGINEERING DESIGN GROUP GEOTECHNICAL, CIVIL, STRUCTURAL & ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANTS r-S If you have any questions regarding this report, or if we can be of further service, please do not hesitate to contact us. We hope the report provides you with necessary information to continue with the development of the project. , Sincerely, ENGINEERING DBSlGN—. i,-™~*^zt Steven Norris California RCE #47672 Van Vooren Residence 2175 Chestnut Avenue^ Carlsbad, California Page No. 10 Job No. 012570 ENGINEERING DESIGN GROUP GEOTECHNICAL, CIVIL, STRUCTURAL & ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANTS SITE VICINITY MAP PROJECT NAME VAN VOOREN RESIDENCE ADDITION PROJECT ADDRESS 2175 CHESTNUT AVENUE, CARLSBAD, CA JOB NUMBER 012570-1 ENGINEERING DESIGN GROUP GEOTECHNICAL. CIVIL, STRUCTURAL & ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANTS 2121 Monliel Road, San Marcos, CA 92069 Phone: (760)839-7302 Fax: (760)480-7477 FIGURE 1 \\Maintftle on mainAFormsW FRMU FRM\2000\MASTER - SITE VICINITY - FIG 1 .wpd SITE Mlfc LOCATION JYLAJP PROJECT NAME PROJECT ADDRESS JOB NUMBER 012570-1 VAN VOOREN RESIDENCE ADDITION 21 75 CHESTNUT AVENUE, CARLSBAD, CA - ENGINEERING DESIGN GROUP GEOTECHNICAL..CIVIL. STRUCTURAL & ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANTS 2121 Monliel Road. San Marcos. CA 92069 Phone: (760)839-7302 Fax: (760)480-7477 FIGURE 2 \\Main\file on main\FormsM FRMM FRM\2000\MASTER - SITE LOCATION - FIG 2.wpd w-0- -it Yard Satbagk. © PROJECT NAME VAN VOOREN RESIDENCE ADDITION PROJECT ADDRESS 2175 CHESTNUT AVENUE, CARLSBAD, CA JOB NUMBER 012570-1 ENGINEERING DESIGN GROUP GEOTECHNICAL. CIVIL. STRUCTURAL & ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANTS 2121 Monllel Road, San Marcos, CA 92069 • Phone: (760]839-7302 Fax: (760)480-7477 FIGURE \\Maln\file on main\Fornns\4 FRM\1 FRM\2000\MASTER - FIG.wpd T"i»Ozoo_lt£UMr"(AUH CD O C CD T3 "oo COa: c 0) oo c. CD <U S .5 ^M UoI <<*OLUQL13U. CO ot~~ 1O CM O U 013 EDG ProjectT-*-0T™<4^CDCDCO CO "E £ CO O ~d CO J3_co COo CD• ^3 CD > < "3.c ~tf> CD -!~o LO N- CM [ Location:\CDco•z. V.a>->-<a C i: 3 ^3 0 >w. a) 0 -J ^r CD . £ §- Q S i2 CNl•oo CN o4 ^ CO 5 Date(s)Observed:CMoOCMrJ>.co2 -piU -0) S ~v"I(B -2t«5. 0) -um •"fc3 CO %. a*S5<im a: LU LU Logged By:O) ZJa •o CD 1ExcavationMethod:0)1creV)O £OO w> -2 ^J •o <Q Co•-a •S- o</> 1Q S<i> 1 1 Q 0)1 '5 CO 2CO to •cic CO CO >, ili. "co >^ ^_g) "en CD"w CD-a E ZJ T3 0 E dt U. C- tfa--£O co H Q CTt0 - 2 CO CO CD O 'co •o C CO CO >.• 'to _>, en "55 CD" COc CD T3 "w 'oe ^-*— «_c O) LU "55 I!Q -0 Z w < 3cy^ K Tf CO cr"^~ • CM 01to UJcc Q. UJa: o. .O CM I CM•Ooo_Jh-E!H-tfiUJ1-Van Vooren ResidenceCD Ere ^<*M UtQ. m6ZUJ{£Oou_012570-3 ' • |L."<U _O•Q S3 ^3a> 'o' ct 0 QUJ ^<+—o*^0)(!)J=CO 2175 Chestnut Avenue, Carlsbad, Californiae_o «uo—1 CDO2 GroundwaterLevel:o CD . £U1 3fi CM O O CM N" >* TOs Date(s)Observed:CMOOCM?-jf><CO2 — . 1Backfilled(date)a> 0 1«o >< i.^a4>•q; m C£UJUJ Logged By:.-. en Q -o co .X ExcavationMethod: \o>"IcCOCOoV)o:D V)m -S 1 t» C CO .0 Hw.a : C '• O (0 0) Q ]ro £ 1 £ §• Q cu •| '3 CO 2CO 5 CO T3• c CO CO •^.^.^N 'co ^^ ic,O) "co CD" COc -. 'CD T3 Ep T3 CD E dt TOPSOIL/FIDark brown,~-( - t O T-" 2CO :> CO ndstone. . .CO CO >? '55 >* _CO ~</5 CD" CO <D T3 -4*J CO 'o E >•« jd O) ill 'w SANDSTONRust brown,o CO i CM '•.• z: 5 h-. UJ CO UJa:a. LUtr: o X.. Q. ' CUo te •" A • ^ 0 Ji- 17 V- V ;•( / 4*fi" ^ , ta ~V2. : zi s«i T- ~N _-X • 1'r} CM 00 •»— «^,l{ Q v •tf •- N i j ^r en _n JI CO r«-oo 05 o APPEND1X -A- APPENDIX A 1!*1 REFERENCES 11 • - •• 1 . • ' . • 1. California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology, Fault-Rupture Zones in H California, Special Publication 42, Revised 1990. 2. Greensfelder, R.W., 1974, Maximum Credible Rock Acceleration from Earthquakes in California: California Division of Mines and Geology, Map Sheet 23. r 3. Hart, Michael.June 17,1994, Gelogic Investigation, 7505 Hillside Drive, La Jolla.CA, File NO: 153- H " 94- ~ P 4. Engineering Design Group, Un-published In-House Data. 5. 5. Ploessel, M.R, and Slossan, J.E., 1974 Repeatable High Ground Acceleration from Earthquakes: H California Geololgy, Vol. 27, No. 9, P.195-199. - •-. •- - .i i 6. State of California, Fault Map of California, Map No: 1 , Dated 1975. n L 7. - State of California, Geologic Map of California, Map No;2, Dated 1977. APPENDIX -B- ia m GENERAL EARTHWORK AND GRADING SPECIFICATIONS 1.0 General Intent These specifications are presented as general procedures and recommendations for grading and earthwork to be utilized in conjunction with the approved grading plans. These general earthwork and grading specifications are a part of the recommendations contained in the geotechnical report and shall be superseded by the recommendations in the geotechnical report in the case of conflict. Evaluations performed by the consultant during the course of grading may result in new recommendations which could supersede these specifications or the recommendations of the geotechnical report. It shall be the responsibility of the contractor to read and understand these specifications, as well as the geotechnical report and approved grading plans. 2.0 Earthwork Observation and Testing Prior to the commencement of grading, a qualified geotechnical consultant should be employed for the purpose of observing earthwork procedures and testing the fills for conformance with the recommendations of the geotechnical report and these specifications. It shall be the responsibility of the contractor to assist the consultant and keep him apprised of work schedules and changes, at least 24 hours in advance, so that he may schedule his personnel accordingly. No grading operations should be performed without the knowledge of the geotechnical consultant The contractor shall not assume that the geotechnical consultant is aware of all grading operations. It shall be the sole responsibility of the contractor to provide adequate equipment and methods to accomplish the work in accordance with applicable grading codes and agency ordinances, recommendations in the geotechnical report, and the approved grading plans not withstanding the testing and observation of the geotechnical consultant. If, in the opinion of the consultant, unsatisfactory conditions, such as unsuitable soil, poor moisture condition, inadequate compaction, adverse weather, etc., are resulting in a quality"of work less than recommended in the geotechnical report and the specifications, the consultant will be empowered to reject the work and recommend that construction be stopped until the conditions are rectified. Maximum dry density tests used to evaluate the degree of compaction should be performed in general accordance with the latest version of the American Society for Testing and Materials test method ASTM D1557. -1- 3.0 Preparation of Areas to be Filled 3.1 Clearing and Grubbing: Sufficient brush, vegetation, roots and all other deleterious material should be removed or properly disposed of in a method acceptable to the owner, design engineer, governing agencies and the geotechnical consultant. The geotechnical consultant should evaluate the extent of these removals depending on specific site conditions. In general, no more than 1 percent (by volume) of the fill material should consist of these materials and nesting of these materials should not be allowed. 3.2 Processing: The existing ground, which has been evaluated by the geotechnical consultant to be satisfactory for support of fill, should be scarified to a minimum depth of 6 inches. Existing ground which is not satisfactory should be overexcavated as specified in the following section. Scarification should continue until the soils are broken down and free of large clay lumps or clods and until the working surface is reasonably uniform, flat, and free of uneven features which would inhibit uniform compaction. 3.3 Overexcavation: Soft, dry, organic-rich, spongy, highly fractured, or otherwise unsuitable ground, extending to such a depth that surface processing cannot adequately improve the condition, should be overexcavated down to competent ground, as evaluated by the geotechnical consultant. For purposes of determining quantities of materials overexcavated, a licensed land surveyor/civil engineer should be utilized. 3.4 Moisture Conditioning: Overexcavated and processed soils should be watered, dried-back, blended, and/or mixed, as necessary to attain a uniform moisture content near optimum. 3.5 Recompaction: Overexcavated and processed soils which have been properly mixed, screened of deleterious material, and moisture-conditioned should be recompacted to a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent or as otherwise recommended by the geotechnical consultant. -2- 3.6 Benching: Where fills are to be placed on ground with slopes steeper than 5:1 (horizontal to vertical), the ground should be stepped or benched. The lowest bench should be a minimum of 15 feet wide, at least 2 feet into competent material as evaluated by the geotechnical consultant. Other benches should be excavated into competent material as evaluated by the geotechnical consultant. Ground sloping flatter than 5:1 should be benched or otherwise overexcavated when recommended by the geotechnical consultant. 3.7 Evaluation of Fill Areas: All areas to receive fill, including processed areas, removal areas, and toe-of-fill benches, should be evaluated by the geotechnical consultant prior to fill placement. 4.0 Fill Material 4.1 General: Material to be placed as. fill should be sufficiently free of organic matter and other deleterious substances, and should be evaluated by the geotechnical consultant prior too placement. Soils of poor gradation, expansion, or strength characteristics should be placed .as recommended by the geotechnical consultant or mixed with other soils to achieve satisfactory fill material. 4.2 Oversize: Oversize material, defined as rock or other irreducible material with a maximum dimension greater than 6 inches, should not be buried or placed in fills, unless the location, materials, and disposal methods are specifically recommended by the geotechnical consultant. Oversize disposal operations should be such that nesting of oversize material does not occur, and such that the oversize material is completely surrounded by compacted or densified fill. Oversize material should not be placed within 10 feet vertically of finish grade, within 2 feet of future utilities or underground construction, or within 15 feet horizontally of slope faces, in accordance with the attached detail. -3- 4.3 Import: If importing of fill material is required for grading, the import material should meet the requirements of Section 4.1. Sufficient time should be given to allow the geotechnical consultant to observe (and test, if necessary) the proposed import materials. 5.0 Fill Placement and Compaction 5.1 Fill Lifts: Fill material should be placed in areas prepared and previously evaluated to receive fill, in near-horizontal layers approximately 6 inches in compacted thickness. Each layer should be spread evenly and thoroughly mixed to attain uniformity of material and moisture throughout. 5.2 Moisture Conditioning: Fill soils should be watered, dried-back, blended, and/or mixed, as necessary to attain a uniform moisture content near optimum. 5.3 Compaction of Fill: After each layer has been evenly spread, moisture- conditioned, and mixed, it should be uniformly compacted to not less than 90 percent of maximum dry density (unless otherwise specified). Compaction equipment should be adequately sized and be either specifically designed for soil compaction or of proven reliability, to efficiently achieve the specified degree and uniformity of compaction. 5.4 Fill Slopes: Compacting of slopes should be accomplished, in addition to normal compacting procedures, by backrolling of slopes with sheepsfoot rollers at increments of 3 to 4 feet in fill elevation gain, or by other methods producing satisfactory results. At the completion of grading, the relative compaction of the fill out to the slope face would be at least 90 percent. 5.5 Compaction Testing: Field tests of the moisture content and degree of compaction of the fill soils should be performed at the consultant's discretion based on field conditions encountered. In general, the tests should be taken at approximate intervals of 2 feet in vertical rise and/or 1,000 cubic yards of compacted fill soils. In addition, on slope faces, as a guideline approximately one test should be taken for each 5,000 square feet of slope face and/or each 10 feet of vertical height of slope. 6.0 Subdrain Installation Subdrain systems, if recommended, should be installed in areas previously evaluated for suitability by the geotechnical consultant, to conform to the approximate alignment and details shown on the plans or herein. The subdrain location or materials should not be changed or modified unless recommended by the geotechnical consultant. The consultant, however, may recommend changes in subdrain line or grade depending on conditions encountered. All subdrains should be surveyed by a licensed land surveyor/civil engineer for line and grade after installation. Sufficient time shall be allowed for the survey, prior to commencement of filling over the subdrains. 7.0 Excavation Excavations and cut slopes should be evaluated by a representative of the geotechnical consultant (as necessary) during grading. If directed by the geotechnical consultant, further excavation, overexcavation, and refilling of cut areas and/or remedial grading of cut slopes (i.e., stability fills or slope buttresses) may be recommended. 8.0 Quantity Determination For purposes of determining quantities of materials excavated during grading and/or determining the limits of overexcavation, a licensed land surveyor/civil engineer should be utilized. MINIMUM RETAINING WALL WATERPROOFING & DRAINAGE DETAIL FINAL WATERPROOFING SPECIFICATIONS & DETAILS TO BE PROVIDED BY PROJECT ARCHITECT TOP OF RETAINING WALL MASTIC TO BE APPLIED TO TOP OF WALL MASTIC TYPE WATER PROOFING (HLM 5000 OR EQUIV) INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURES SPECIFICATIONS ic PROTECTED WITH BACKER BOARD (ABOVE MIRADRAIN) MASTIC NOT TO BE EXPOSED TO SUNLIGHT SOIL BACKFILL. COMPACTED TO 90% RELATIVE COMPACTION PER REFERENCE ft END MIRADRAIN (top) AREA DRAIN SYSTEMRETAINING WALL UIRADRAJN MEMBRANE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURES SPECIFICATIONS OVER MASTIC WATERPROOFING - HLM 5000 OR EQUIVALENT COMPACTED FILL WALL FOOTING • PROPOSED SLOPE BACKCUT PER OSHA STANDARDS OR PER ALTERNATIVE SLOPING PLAN. OR PER APPROVED SHORING PLAN OR BEDROCK FILTER FABRIC ENVELOPE (MIRAF1 14ON OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT) 12" MIN. LAP 3/4" - 1 1/2" CLEAN GRAVEL 4"X4" (45d) CONCRETE CANT O FOOTING/WALL CONNECTION (UNDER WATER PROOFING) 4" (MIN.) DIAMETER PERFORATED PVC PIPE (SCHEDULE 40 OR EQ.) WITH PERFORATIONS ORIENTED DOWN AS DEPICTED MIN. 27. GRADIENT TO SUITABLE OUTLET. END MIRADRAIN (bottom) "COMPETENT BEDROCK OR FILL MATERIAL AS EVALUATED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT fROJECT NUMBER PROJECT NAME PROJECT ADDRESS IDRAWN BY: r-r-o" ENGINEERING DESIGN GROUP 810 WEST LOS VALLECITOS BLVD. SUITE "A" SAN MARCOS, CA 92069 (760) 752-7010 FAX (760) 752-7092 DETAIL/FIGURE NUMBER DATE SIDE HILL STABILITY FILL DETAIL Bm EXISTING GROUND SURFACE. FINISHED SLOPE FACE PROJECT 1 TO 1 LINE FROM TOP OF SLOPE TO OUTSIDE EDGE OF KEY FINISHED CUT PAD OVERBURDEN OR UNSUITABLE MATERIAL PAD OVEREXCAVATION DEPTH AND RECOMPACTION MAY BE RECOMMENDED BY THE QEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT BASED ON ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS^ ENCOUNTERED. . OMPETENT BEDROCK OR MATERIAL AS EVALUATED BY THE QEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT NOTE: Subdrain details and key width recommendations to be provided based on exposed subsurface conditions fl CANYON SUBDRAIN DETAILS GROUND SURFACE BENCHING REMOVE UNSUITABLE MATERIAL SUBDRAIN TRENCH SEE BELOW 8' MIN. OVERLAP SUBDRAIN TRENCH DETAILS FILTER FABRIC ENVELOPE (MIRAFI 14ON OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT}* MIN. OVERLAP 4' MIN. BEDDING 3/4'-1-1/2' CLEAN GRAVEL <8«.3/ft. MIN.) t 6' ti MIN. PERFORATED PIPE 3M'-1-1/2' CLEAN .GRAVEL (9ft.3/ft. MINJ *IF CALTRANS CLASS 2 PERMEABLE MATERIAL IS USED IN PLACE OF 3/4--1-1/2* GRAVEL. FILTER FABRIC MAY BE DELETED DETAIL OF CANYON SUBDRAIN TERMINAL DESIGN FINISH GRADE SUBORAIN TRENCH SEE ABOVE NONPERFORATED 6' 0 MIN. 6' 0 MIN. PIPE SPECIFICATIONS FOR CALTRANS CLASS 2 PERMEABLE MATERIAL U.S. Standard Steve Size 1" 3/4" 3/8" No. 4. No. 8 . No. 30 No. 50 No. 200 Passing 100 90-100 40-100 25-40 18-33 5-15 0-7 0-3 - Sand Equivalent>75 Subdrain should b« constructed only on competent material as evaluated by the geotechnical consultant. SUBDRAIN INSTALLATION Subdrain pipe should be Installed with perforations down as depicted. At location* recommended by the geotechnical consultant, nonperforated pipe should be Installed. SUBDRAIN TYPE-Subdraln type should be Acrylonltrlle Butadiene Styrene (A.B.S.), Polyvlnyl Chloride <PVC) or approved equivalent. Class 125, SDR 32.5 should be used for maximum fill depths of 33 feet. Class 200, SDR 21 should be used for maximum fill depths of 100 feet. STABILITY FILL / BUTTRESS DETAIL BACK CUT 1:1 OR FLATTER SEE 3UBDRAIN TRENCH DETAIL ip;r;-r--r-jr^-35^G^4 ft "-MIS u OUTLET PIPES 4* 0 NONPERFORATED PIPE. 100' MAX. O.C. HORIZONTALLY, 30' MAX. O.C. VERTICALLY S-KHH^C OMP ACTED C^—I—HHHK:- FILLHI-rl-S LOWEST SUBDRAIN SHOULD BE SITUATED A3 LOW AS POSSIBLE TO ALLOW SUITABLE OUTLET KEY WIDTH A3 NOTED OH GRADING PLANS 19' MIN. PERFORATED PIPE -v.. 10' MIN. EACH SIDE F^-H—i cn_l5^—CAP NON-PERFORATED J] OUTLET PIPE_-"*1l T-CONNECTION DETAIL 6* MIN. OVERLAP 3/4*-1-1/2* CLEAN GRAVEL (3ft?/ft. MIN.) 4" 0 NON-PERFORATED PIPE. FILTER FABRIC ENVELOPE (MIRAFI 140N OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT)* SEE T-CONNECTION DETAIL 6' MIN. COVER 4' 0 PERFORATED PIPE 4* MIN. BEDDING SUBDRAIN TRENCH DETAIL *IF CALTRANS CLASS 2 PERMEABLE MATERIAL IS USED IN PLACE OF 3/4--1-1/2* GRAVEL, FILTER FABRIC MAY BE DELETED SPECIFICATIONS FOR CLASS 2 PERMEABLE U.S. Standard Sieve Size ' % 1" 3/4" 3/8" No. 4 No. 8 No . 30 No. 50 No. 200 CALTRANS MATERIAL Passing 100 90-100 40-100 25-40 13-33 5-15 0-7 0-3 Sand Equivalent>75 or... dlm.n.ionv ... g..t.ehnleal r.port/plw.. Actual may b.SlnQ.dby th. g.ot.o»inlc«i consultant b.a.d on field condit.on*. buttra" SUBDRAIN INSTALLAT.ON-Subdraln pip....l.o«ld b. In.t.ll. ' At location* r«comm«nd«d by th« a«ot«chnJcal conaultant pip. »nou SUBORAIN TYPE-Subdr.ln .typ. -hou.d b. Aorylon trll. 8«t.dl.«. S.tyr.«. (A.B.S.), (PVC) or approv.d .qulval.nt. Claaa 125.3OR 32.5 ahould b. ua.d for maximum fill Cla»« 200,SOR 21 should b« u««d for maximum Hit d«pth« of 1QQ »««t. FILL SLOPE EXISTING GROUND KEY AND BENCHING DETAILS PROJECT 1 TO 1 LINE PROM TOE OP TO COMPETENT SURFACE REMOVE UNSUITABLE MATERIAL BENCH 2' MIN. KEY LOWEST DEPTH BENCH (KEY) FILL-OVER-CUT SLOPE EXISTING GROUND SURFACE Iid TT*—15--MIN.—^ '' ' LOWEST ' BENCH (KEY) CUT SLOPE (TO BE EXCAVATED PRIOR TO FILL PLACEMENT) REMOVE UNSUITABLE MATERIAL EXISTING GROUNDsuRFACE- CUT-OVER-FILL SLOPE CUT SLOPE (TO BE EXCAVATED PRIOR TO FILL PLACEMENT) PROJECT 1 TO 1 LINE FROM TOE OF SLOPE TO COMPETENT MATERIAL REMOVE UNSUITABLE MATERIAL BENCH 2' MIN. KEY DEPTH MIN LOWEST BENCH (KEY) NOTE: Back drain may bo recommended by the geotechnical consultant based on actual field conditions encountered. Bench dimension recommendation* may alto be altered baaed on field conditions encountered. ROCK DISPOSAL DETAIL FINISH QRAOC SLOPE FACE •OVERSIZE WINDROW GRANULAR SOIL (3.£.i 3O) TO BE DEN3IF1ED IN PLACE BY FLOODING DETAIL TYPICAL PROFILE ALONG WINDROW and 15 feet horizontally of slope faces. 2) Rocks with maximum dimensions greater than 4 feet should not be utilized in fills 3) Rock placement, flooding of granu.ar soil, and.fill placement should be observed by the geotechnicai consultant. 4) Maximum size and spacing of windrows > should be ir 'accordance Width of windrow should not exceed 4 feet. Windrows should vertically (as depicted). details 5) Rock should be placed in excavated trenches to 30) should be flooded in the windrow to c rocks. arounu APPENDIX -C- c"< i ^fi LABORATORY TESTING PROCEDURES ^ Direct Shear Test Direct shear tests are performed on remolded and/or relatively undisturbed samples which are soaked for a minimum of 24 hours prior to testing. After transferring the I' sample to the shearbox, and reloading, pore pressures are allowed to dissipated for a period of approximately 1 hour prior to application of shearing force. The samples are sheared in a motor- driven, strain controlled, direct-shear testing apparatus. After a travel of approximately 1/4 inch, the motor is stopped and the sample is allowed to "relax" for approximately 15 minutes. Where applicable, the "relaxed" and "peak" shear values are recorded. It is anticipated that, in a majority of samples tested, the 15 minutes relaxing of the sample is sufficient to allow dissipation of pore 1 - pressures set up due to application of the shearing force. The relaxed values are therefore judged to be good estimations of effective strength parameters. r? 1 VI Expansion Index Tests: The expansion potential of representative samples is evaluated by the Expansion Index Test, U.B.C. Standard No. 29-2. Specimens are-molded under a given compactive energy to approximately the optimum moisture content and approximately 50 percent saturation. The prepared 1 -inch thick by 4-inch diameter specimens are loaded to an equivalent ; ' 144 psf surcharge and are inundated with tap water for 24 hours or until volumetric equilibrium Li is reached. Classification Tests: Typical materials were subjected to mechanical grain-size analysis by wet sieving from U.S. Standard brass screens (ASTM D422-65). Hydrometer analyses were performed where appreciable quantities of fines were encountered. The data was evaluated in determining the classification of the materials. The grain-size distribution curves are presented in the test data and the Unified Soil Classification is presented in both the test data and the boring logs. •1 APPENDIX -D- EXISTING GRADE ROUGHEN CONCRETE AND APPLY EPOXY GROUT BEFORE POURING NEW CONCRETE EXISTING FOOTING NO: 3 TIES AT 1(T O.C. (2) NO: 4 BAflS TOP & BOTTOM FIRM SOIL* DRILL 7/8 DIA. BY 8" DEEP HOLES AT 10' O.C. DOWEL WITH NO: 4 BARS AND EPOXY GROUT TO BE FIELD VERIFIED BY OUR OFFICE NOTES: 1) CONCRETE SHALL DEVELOP A MIN. 2000 PSl COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH AT 28 DAYS. 2) REINFORCEMENT SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM GRADE 60 DEFORMED- BARS. 3) ALL JOINTS TO BE SEALED WITH NON-SHRINKAGE POLYSULFIDE OR POLYURETHANE SEALANT. JOINT SEALANT SHALL BE APPLIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURERS INSTRUCTIONS. 4) UNDERPIN FOOTINGS SHOULD EXTEND 36 INCHES ON EITHER SIDE OF THE CRACK. THE ENGINEERING DESIGN GROUP UNDERPINNING DETAIL BY:SN DETAIL NO. 1 City of Carlsbad Building Department CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE PAYMENT OF SCHOOL FEES OR OTHER MITIGATION This form must be completed by the City, the applicant, and the appropriate school districts and returned to the City prior to issuing a building permit. The City will not issue any building permit without a completed school fee form. Project Name: Building Permit Plan Check Number: Project Address: A.P.N.: Project Applicant (Owner Name(s): Project Description: Main Moo -230 C-h~e$-/'WUcf' / G~l -000 - 43 S&0H BUILDING TYPE: Residential:Number of New Dwelling Units Square Feet of Living Area in New Dwelling Second Dwelling Unit: Square Feet of Living Area in SOU /i A Residential Additions: Net Square Feet New Area 15 ~1 / Commercial/Industrial: City Certification of applicant's information: Square Feet Floor Area Date: ? / / 2 -SCHOOL DISTRICTS WITHIN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD Carlsbad Unified School District 801 Pine Ave. Carlsbad CA 92009 (729-9291) San Marcos Unified School District 215MataWay San Marcos, CA 92069 (290-2649) Encinitas Union School District 101 South Rancho Santa Fe Rd Encinitas, CA 92024 (944-4300) San Dieguito Union High School District 710 Encinitas Blvd. Encinitas, CA 92024 (753-6491) Certification of Applicant/Owners. The person executing this declaration ("Owner") certifies under penalty of perjury that (1) the information provided above is correct and true to the best of the Owner's knowledge, and that the Owner will file an amended certification of payment and pay the additional fee if Owner requests an increase in the number of dwelling units or square footage after the building permit is issued or if the initial determination of units or square footage is found to be incorrect, and that (2) the Owner is the owner/ developer of the above described projects), or that the person executing this declaration is authorized to sign on behalf of the Owner. Signature:Date: SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL FEE CERTIFICATION (To be completed by the school district(s)) 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (76O) 6O2-27OO • FAX (760) 6O2-8560 RpuiceH d/17/fin THIS FORM INDICATES THAT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROJECT HAVE BEEN OR WILL BE SATISFIED. SCHOOL DISTRICT: The undersigned, being duly authorized by the applicable School District, certifies that the developer, builder, or owner has satisfied the obligation for school facilities. This is to certify that the applicant listed on page 1 has paid all amounts or completed other applicable school mitigation determined by the School District. The City may issue building permits for this project. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICIAL TITLE NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT DATE PHONE NUMBER Freeman Assistant Superintendent Business Saivicea Carlsbad Unified School District 801 Pine Avenue uicaH 4/17/OO \ V\'v'.J.\\tel^\_ -n ^. °V n\0> ON,' 7Mf\ •c o» JOr^ &, tAa r~^ ^<>z<!^B°x> ™">mT>> I 7] O 13 s 73 A) u> TJ 0 =93 3 -a 33 r20 QIP ISs-S-"1-s|s§-gS3^! IIP CD City of Carlsbad . 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 =24-2003 Plan Check Revision Permit No: PCR02332 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 Job Address: 2175 CHESTNUT AV CBAD Permit Type: PCR Status: ISSUED Parcel No: 1670804300 Lot#: 0 Applied: 12/30/2002 Valuation: $0.00 Construction Type: VN Entered By: RMA Reference*: Plan Approved: 01/24/2003 Issued: 01/24/2003 Project Title: VANVOOREN RES-CHANGE STEEL TO Inspect Areah AI /OA/A? MM Al Q? WOOD FRAMING-ADD 150 SF 2ND FLR-MOVE WALLS OUT ~~' ^ COP ?4? 99 Applicant: , Owner: VANVOOREN PAUL&CAROL . , VANVOOREN PAUL&CAROL 4984 EUCALYPTUS LN 4984 EUCALYPTUS LN CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92008 Plan Check Revision Fee . $242.99 Additional Fees $0.00 Total Fees: $242.99 Total Payments To Date: $0.00 Balance Due: $242.99 APPLICATION CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008 1. PROJECT INFORgAflpN ex FOR OFFICE USE ONLY PLAN CHECK NO./ffo/^J ~^-^ EST. VAL. \l_ Plan Ck. Deposit Validated By Date ]A / $ £ / Address (include Bldg/Suite #)Business Name (at this address) Legal Description Lot No.Subdivision Name/Number Unit No. Phase No. Total # of units r <J^ Assessor's Parcel #Existing Use PrposId Use \JDescriptionofWork TV CONTACT PERSON (if different from applicant) #of Stories # of Bathrooms Name Address City 3. APPLICANT , D Contractor Q Agent for.Contractor .. D Owner: , Q Agent for Owner State/Zip Telephone #Fax# Name 4, PROPERTY OWNER Address City State/Zip Telephone # \ Address City State/Zip TelephoneName 5. CONTRACTOR - COMPANY NAME . , - (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law [Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars [$500]). Name State License # Address License Class City State/Zip City Business License # Telephone # Designer Name Address , City State/Zip Telephone State License # 6. WORKERS^ COMPENSATION • '• . Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: d I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. n I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3.700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Insurance Company Policy No. . Expiration Date (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS [$100] OR LESS) l~l CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), in addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees. SIGNATURE DATE I OWNER-BUILDER DECLARATION I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: [D I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). f^L, I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). j . . • dl I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason: 1. I pefGsqally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. [~l YES 2. uhave^iave not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. 3. I have contracted with the^fpJlQwing person (firmljto provide_the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): ervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phonei T. I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate \ number / contractors license number): l^s dtyt// £~) *.jyTgyVX/V/V/^OC^ Q. 5. I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type of 'ROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE DATE COMPLETE THIS SECTION FOR NON-ttESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMITS ONLY Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? Q YES CD NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? O YES f~l NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? l~l YES l~| NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. 8. CONSTRUCTION LENDING AGENCY : I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 30970) Civil Code). LENDER'S NAME ' LENDER'S ADDRESS 9. APPLICANT CERTIFICATION '•'_.. I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the City of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS. COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not.eSrTtmencedwithin/180 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is cofrimenc^d foHajberiOd of t6o days (Section 106.4.4 Uniform Building Code). APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE iTCjAj/ {/(&>"-' " WHITE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance DATE EsGil Corporation In Partnership with Government for Building Safety DATE: 01/24/O3 a APPLICANT a JURIS. JURISDICTION: Carlsbad a PLAN REVIEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: PCR02-332 (02-230) SET: II PROJECT ADDRESS: 2175 Chestnut Ave. PROJECT NAME: Plan Changes/Added Sg Footage for Van Vooren Residence XI The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. \ The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: XI Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS: 1) Permit application to reflect 348 sg ft of living and 7 sg ft of deck. 2) Sending back original approved set. By: Ray Fuller Enclosures: Esgil Corporation n GA D MB D EJ n PC 01/21/03 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 4 San Diego, California 92123 + (858)560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 EsGil Corporation In tPartnersfap taitd government far Quitting Safety DATE: 01/07/03 "JURIED JURISDICTION: Carlsbad cTPTSNREVlEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: PCR02-332 (02-230) SET: I PROJECT ADDRESS: 2175 Chestnut Ave. PROJECT NAME: Plan Changes/Added Sg Footage for Van Vooren Residence The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Paul & Carol Van Vooren 4984 Eucalyptus Ave. Carlsbad, Ca. 92008 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Paul & Carol Van Vooren Telephone #: (760) 535-8050 Date contacted: i/T/03 (by: \cO Fax #: Mail-^ Telephone Fax In Person Contact also Dave Jennings (760)594-0950 ^\ I™" h M A r^is/•* TTP P^^^ t I~^J r*'^^ f^ LJ* I ^"^ 1 WJ , VJ^^J^^J^^J^—REMARKS: By: Ray Fuller Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC 12/30/02 tmsmtLdot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858)560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 Oarlsbad PCR02-332 (02-230) 01/07/03 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES PLAN CHECK NO.: PCRO2-332 (02-230)JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 2175 Chestnut Ave. FLOOR AREA: Addition 219 REMARKS: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: 12/30/02 DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED: O1/07/03 STORIES: 2 HEIGHT: 21 ft per UBC DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 12/30/02 PLAN REVIEWER: Ray Fuller FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Present California law mandates that residential construction comply with the 2001 edition of the California Building Code (Title 24), which adopts the following model codes: 1997 UBC, 2000 UPC, 2000 UMC and 1999 NEC (all effective 11/1/02). The above regulations apply to residential construction, regardless of the code editions adopted by ordinance. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e.. plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. 1 Carlsbad PCRO2-332 (02-230) 01/O7/O3 • PLANS 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92009, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 2. Final sets of plans and any new calculations to be stamped and signed by engineer and /or architect of record also. 3. The sg footages of revision noted on A1 do not seem to match floor plans. It appears that additional 265 sg ft and 7 ft of deck added at 2nd floor and 93 at 1st floor for total of 358 sg ft. The cover sheet/permit application needs to reflect the correct sg footages adding. 4. No new energy calculations provided for change windows and additional 358 sg ft. 5. Rear wall of A4 does not reflect window sizes at closets and new office. 6. The power room on A4 is not reflected on E2 i.e. show basin and GFCI. 7. Added ceiling fan on E-1 at bedroom below new office to be a minimum of 3 ft from smoke detector per listing. 8. Garage will require outside combustion air as now not large enough with added FAU. 9. Could not locate how 2 to 1 ratio is meant i.e. any panel less than 4 V* ft for 1st floor with 9 ft plate height. Specify size of blocking, type and length of straps. 10. Need to imprint new CR1 -R forms on the plans. Carlsbad PCRO2-332 (02-230) 01/07/O3 • To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. • Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. • Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: Yes Q No a The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Ray Fuller at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. Carlsbad PCRO2-332 (02-23O) O1/O7/O3 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad 230) PREPARED BY: Ray Fuller BUILDING ADDRESS: 2175 Chestnut Ave. PLAN CHECK NO.: PCRO2-332 (02- DATE: 01/07/03 BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R3 Ul TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN BUILDING PORTION Addition Deck? Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE Jurisdiction Code AREA ( Sq. Ft.) 358 12 CB Rlrln Pprmtt FAO hv OrHinanrp V Valuation Multiplier 82.00 By Ordinance Reg. Mod. VALUE ($) 29,356 29,356 $242.99 Plan Check Fee by Ordinance Type of Review: CH Repetitive Fee Repeats Complete Review D Other — Hourly Structural Only Hour* Esgil Plan Review Fee $157.94 $136.07 Comments: Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue.doc PLANNING/ENGINEERING APPROVALS PERMIT NUMBER CB^fCR^£33^ DATE .-//?/£> 3 ADDRESS SL1 RESIDENTIAL TENANT IMPROVEMENT RESIDENTIAL ADDITION MINOR « $10,000.00) PLAZA CAMINO REAL CARLSBAD COMPANY STORES VILLAGE FAIRE COMPLETE OFFICE BUILDING OTHER PLANNER DATE ENGINEE! Oocs/Mlsforms/Piannlng Engineering Approvals DATE D D Plan Check No. _ Planner Greg Fisher APN: PLANNING DEPARTMENT JILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST Add,ess Phone (760) 602-4629 Type of Project sTllse: Zoning: ^X»^^ General Net Project Density:DU,;AC Facilities Management Zone: Remaining net dev acres:/MCFD (in/out) #_Date of participation^ non-residential development: Type of land used created by thisCircle One permit: Legend: t>3 Item Complete f~l Item Incomplete - Needs your action Environmental Review Required: YES _ NO _ TYPE _ DATE OF COMPLETION: - _ p__ Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: • _ • •_ Discretionary Action Required: APPROVAL/RESO. NO. PROJECT NO. YES NO DATE TYPE OTHER RELATED CASES: Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: " D a Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance Project site located in Coastal'Zone? YES_ CA Coastal Commission Authority? YES_ N0_ NO If California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact them at - 7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite 103, San Diego CA 92108-4402; (61 9) 767-2370 Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt): Coastal Permit Determination Form already completed? YES NO If NO, complete Coastal Permit Determination Form now. Coastal Permit Determination Log #: Follow-Up Actions: 1) Stamp Building Plans as "Exempt" or "Coastal Permit Required" (at minimum Floor Plans). 2) Complete Coastal Permit Determination Log as needed. Inclusionary Housing Fee required: YES NO (Effective date of Inclusionary Housing'Ordinance - May 21, 1993.) Data Entry Completed? YES NO (A/P/Ds, Activity Maintenance, enter CB#, toolbar, Screens, Housing Fees, Construct Housing Y/N, Enter Fee, UPDATE!) H:\ADMIN\COUNTER\BldgPlnchkRevChklst Rev 9/01 O O CJ ra re re Q. Q. C. D D D D Plan Check No. _ Planner Greg Fisher APN: PLANNING DEPARTMENT JILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST Address Phone (760) 602-4629 Type of Project & Use: Zoning: y^>y*^ General Pla CFD (in/out) #_Date of participation^ Circle One Net Project Density:.DU/AC Facilities Management Zone: Remaining net dev acres: (For non-residential development: Type of land used created by this permit: _ __) Legend: ^ Item Complete l~~l Item Incomplete - Needs your action Environmental Review Required: YES _ NO _ TYPE _ DATE OF COMPLETION: _ r_ Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: ' _ .:...: Discretionary Action Required: APPROVAL/RESO. NO. PROJECT NO. YES NO TYPE DATE OTHER RELATED CASES: Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: ^ D D Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance Project site located in Coastal'Zone? YES_ CA Coastal Commission Authority? YES N0_ NO If California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact them at - 7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite 103, San Diego CA 92108-4402; (619) 767-2370 Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt): Coastal Permit Determination Form already completed? YES NO If NO, complete Coastal Permit Determination Form now. Coastal Permit Determination Log #: , Follow-Up Actions: 1) Stamp Building Plans as "Exempt" or "Coastal Permit Required" (at minimum Floor Plans). 2) Complete Coastal Permit Determination Log as needed. Inclusionary Housing Fee required: YES NO (Effective date of Inclusionary Housing'Qrdinance - May 21, 1993.) Data Entry Completed? YES NO (A/P/Ds, Activity Maintenance, enter CB#, toolbar, Screens, Housing Fees, Construct Housing Y/N, Enter Fee, UPDATE!) H:\ADMIN\COUNTER\BldgPlnchkRevChklst Rev 9/01 ENGINEERING I DESIGN GROUP 2121 Montiel Road, San Marcos, California 92069 • (760) 839-7302 • Fax: (760) 480-7477 • E-mail: ENGDG@aol.com Date: December 23, 2002 To: Mr. Paul Van Vooren 4984 Eucalyptus Lane Carlsbad, CA 92008 Re: Proposed New Additions to Existing Residence, located at 2175 Chestnut Avenue, City of Carlsbad, California Subject: Plan Review Letter Ref: 1. "Limited Geotechnical Investigation, for Proposed New Van Vooren Additions, to be located at 2175 Chestnut Avenue,, City of Carlsbad, California." Prepared by Engineering Design Group, EDG Project No. 012570-1. 2. Plans prepared by James Alcorn & Associates, dated December 23,2002 for the Van Vooren Residence, 2175 Chestnut Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008. Mr. Van Vooren, We have reviewed the changes to the project structural plans (Reference 2) for general conformance to our project soil report (Reference 1). Our review indicates the recommendations of the project soils report generally have been implemented in the project structural changes. It should be noted that the recommendations of the soils report, referenced above, should be used in conjunction with the project plans. Recommendations of the soils report are considered minimums and may be augmented by designers and structural engineers. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Sincerely, & ENGINEERING DESIGN GROUP Job No. 012570 H:\LETTER\LETTER 1\2001\012570 VAN VOOREN, CHESTNUT AVE, CARLSBAD.wpd ENGINEERING I DESIGN GROUP GEOTECHNICAL CIVIL STRUCTURAL S ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANTS FOR RESIDENTIAL S COMMERCIAL CONSTRUCTION 2121 Montiel Road, San Marcos, California 92069 • (760) 839-7302 • Fax: (760) 480-7477 • E-mail: ENGDG@aol.com Date: August 6, 2002 To: Mr. Paul Van Vooren 4984 Eucalyptus Lane Carlsbad, CA 92008 Re: Proposed New Additions to Existing Residence, located at 2175 Chestnut Avenue, City of Carlsbad, California Subject: Plan Review Letter Ref: 1. "Limited Geotechnical Investigation, for Proposed New Van Vooren Additions, to be located at 2175 Chestnut Avenue,, City of Carlsbad, California." Prepared by Engineering Design Group, EDG Project No. 012570-1. 2. PlanspreparedbyJamesAlcorn&Associates,SheetS3,fortheVanVoorenResidence,2175 Chestnut Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008. Mr. Van Vooren, We have reviewed the project structural plans (Reference 2) for general conformance to our project soil report (Reference 1). Our review indicates the recommendations of the project soils report generally have been implemented in the project structural design. / The underpin detail of Appendix D of the original soils report (Reference No. 1) has been provided as a standard detail. Ultimately, it is the project structural engineers responsibility to provide the footing underpin detail, either by using the standard provided or designing a new detail. On this project, the structural engineer has designed his own detail, which does meet the intent of the soils report, by transferring loads from the existing footings down to formational materials. Our review of this detail is from a soils standpoint only, and does not imply approval of the detail from a structural standpoint. The embedment of new underpin footings should be confirmed in the field by the project soils engineer at the time of construction, prior to placement of steel reinforcement. It should be noted that the recommendations of the soils report, referenced above, should be used in conjunction with the project plans. Recommendations of the soils report are considered minimums and may be augmented by designers and structural engineers. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Sincerely, 6 ENGINEERING DESIGN GROUP Job No. 012570 \\Main\file on main\LETTER\LETTER H2001\012570 VAN VOOREN. CHESTNUT AVE, CARLSBAD.wpd City of Carlsbad Building Department CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE PAYMENT OF SCHOOL FEES OR OTHER MITIGATION This form must be completed by the City, the applicant, and the appropriate school districts and returned to the City prior to issuing a building permit. The City will not issue any building permit without a completed school fee form. Project Name: Building Permit Plan Check Number: Project Address: A.P.N.: Project Applicant (Owner Name(s): Project Description: BUILDING TYPE: Residential: /&7~- Number of New Dwelling Units Square Feet of Living Area in New Dwelling Second Dwelling Unit: Square Feet of Living Area in SOU Residential Additions: Net Square Feet New Area -^ %f U\A~L- Commercial/lndustrial: City Certification of applicant's information: Square Feet Floor Area Date: "SCHOOL DISTRICTS WITHIN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD Carlsbad Unified School District 801 PineAve. Carlsbad CA 92009 (729-9291) San Marcos Unified School District 215MataWay San Marcos, CA 92069 (290-2649) Encinitas Union School District 101 South Rancho Santa Fe Rd Encinitas, CA 92024 (944-4300) San Dieguito Union High School District 710 Encinitas Blvd. Encinitas, CA 92024 (753-6491) Certification of Applicant/Owners. The person executing this declaration ("Owner") certifies under penalty of perjury that (1) the information provided above is correct and true to the best of the Owner's knowledge, and that the Owner will file an amended certification of payment and pay the additional fee if Owner requests an increase in the number of dwelling units or square footage after the building permit is issued or if the initial determination of units or square footage is found to be incorrect, and that (2) the Owner is the owner/ developer of the above described projects), or that the person executing this declaration is authorjzedto sign on behalf of the Owner. ure:Date: SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL FEE CERTIFICATION (To be completed by the school district(s)) 1635 Faraday Avenue - Carlsbad, CA 92O08r.73_1A • (760) 602-27OO • FAX (76O) 602-8560^: Rpuiearl4/17/nn THIS FORM INDICATES THAT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROJECT HAVE BEEN OR WILL BE SATISFIED. SCHOOL DISTRICT: The undersigned, being duly authorized by the applicable School District, certifies that the developer, builder, or owner has satisfied the obligation for school facilities. This is to certify that the applicant listed on page 1 has paid all amounts or completed other applicable school mitigation determined by the School District. The City may issue building permits for this project. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICIAL TITLE NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT DATE PHONE NUMBER R sy+> Assistant Superintend** Sendee* Carlsbad Unified School District 801 Pine Avenue Carlsbad. California 920D8