The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2206 PALOMAR AIRPORT RD; ; 82-315; Permit4' .9, C Co 0 - 0 I hereby affirm that I. am licensed under., 0 provisions of Chapter.9 (commencing with Section 7000) of Division '3 of the Business and Professions Code, and my license is In I full force and eflect,v - - • L • Lic. No. ,,,,,,.,,, Class .41____________ ''.0 . '.7 H .1 hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Con- tractor ' s License Law too the following reason (Sec. 7031 S Business and Professions Code: Any city or county which requires a permit to construct - alter, improve, demolish, or repair any structure, prior to its issuance also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement'that he is • licensed pursuant 'to'Ihe'provisions of'the Con- 1 . tractors License Law (Chapter 9 commencing with . . Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Pro. - tensions Code) or that is exempt therefrom and the J' basis for the alleged exemption'Any violation of Section 7031.5 by an applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars ($5001.- k -- - - 13 I, as owner 01 the property, or my employees.-" with wages as their sole compensation, will do the n- • wook,andthestrucfure isnotintendedorofferedfor - sale (Sec. 7044, -Business and- Protessiobs Code: ItO The Contractor's License Laal does not apply to an U , Z owner of property who builds or improves thereon and who does Such work himself or through his own 0 employees, provided that Such improvements are 'I 7- not intended or-otfered for sale. It, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of - , completion, the owner-builder will have the burden . of proving that he did not build or improve .for the h" - - ', purpose of sale). ,". S I] I..as owner of the property, -am exclusively - Z contracting with licensed contractors to construct' - the project (Sec. 704.4, Business and Professions' , Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply 14 to an owner oI,property who builds or. improves 4 - thereon, and who contracts for each projects with a contractor(s) license pursuant to the Contractor's a. License Law).uI - lam exempt under Sec. - ,. B. & P.C.. , forthisreason .. -- ' -. I hereby at/irm that I have a certificate of consent - - to, sell-insure, or a certificate of - Workers' Compnsation Insurance, or a certified copy thereof - (Sec. 3800, Labor Code. r P COMPANY -. - ,opy is tiled with the city. ,z . 0 Certified copy is hereby furnished.0. . . - * 0 - '-CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION FROM.. ' - WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE ' I (this section need not'be completed it the permit , '-is for one hundred dollars ($100) or less)UA - ' 0 1 certify that in the performance of the work for I' - -0 which this permit is issued. I shall not employ any ' person in any manner so as to become subject to - the Workers' Compensation Laws 01 California. * ' '-NOTICE TO APPLICANT: It,'after making this Cerli- ticate 01 Exemption,' you should become subject I - the Workers' Compensation provisions of the Labor ' Code, you must forthwith Comply' with such - . - Proviiofls or this Permit shall be deemed revoked. I " Ishereby affirm that there is a construction .0 I' lending agency to, the performance 01 the wOrt, for 1 S - ' which-this permit, is issued (Sec. 3097, Civil Code). '-.zl' - w Lender's Name - 1 , % L. Lender'sAddress - USE BALL POINT PEN'ONLESS'HARD - .' - '- , ' . APPLICANT TO FILL IN INFORMATION WITHIN SHADED AREA AND QECLARATIONS. - T' :' •' ' -CARLSBAD BUILDING , DEPARTMENT'4 •'APPLICATION PERMIT 'J , . - (,,1200 Elm, Carlsbad, California 92008 (714) 438-5525 : , . ' - ., ,. . tr4 JOB JOB ADDFLESa., • . .. , ' ' , AV, ST. DATE OF APPLI ATION BUSINESS LICENSE # ' - - /qJ VALUATION - PERMIT NUMBER 'OWNER'S NAME , ' ' OWNER'S PHONE PRIME CONTRACTOR ', . , CONTRACTORS PHONE II ZONE It a , OWNER'S MAILING ADDRESS - CONTRACTOR'S ADDRESS 7.ttn ,UCENSE NO. PLAN I.D. # BLDG USE CODE R IL A4- RJ. c4LxJ i LOT' I BLOC,L( SUBDIVISION ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. DESIGNER STATE LICENSE # STANDARD PLAN # BUILDING SO. FOOTAGE' - t , • ,,,, DESCRIPTION OF WORK tr4 - L '7TI4" ') DESIGNER'S ADDRESS AD - °" 9,ESIGNER'S PHONE . . EDU . - , F/PLFLRELEV. ' ' NO, • : STORIES" ' S YN0- .- . ' /3040 CENSUS TRACT OP LAND USE PARKING SPACE RES ITS' - GRADING PERMIT ISSUED REDEVELOPMENT TYPE " FIRE SPR 612V -2.r.'4?- [ AREA O \fS.I¼1 S CC LOAD - .Y 0 _N,/• - vO N - - _vO N . Not Valid Unless Machine Ceriffied QTY PLUMBING PERMIT ISSUE QTY MECHANICAL PERMIT ISSUE - SUMMARY/ACCOUNT NUMBER EACH FIXTURE TRAP '' _'- _-. -. INSTALL FURN. DUCTS UP-TO 100,000 BTU -'. ' _''.'- BUILDINGPERMIT''..'O1-000'4220 . EACH BUILDING SEWER ' _'-i - ,' ,.,'.' '. -•..'OVER100,000,BTU -- ' ' - - 'SIGNPERMiT--' _-01'000-4221 EACH WATER HEATER AND/ORVENT '..' BOILER/COMPRESSOR UPTO3HP --- - _'-,, PLAN CHECK ''-01-000-4806 - -EACH GAS SYSTEM1-TO__4 OUTLETS -.' '*'.: -- BOILER/COMPRESSOR 3.15HP ' ' ' - • TOTAL PLUMBING _'"-,01'000-4222 EACH GAS SYSTEM 5RMORE _,-- -',' ' METALFIREPLACE _,- _.F'-- _ - ELECTRICAL _• _,-01-000-4223 _- - EACH INSTAL _ALTER, REPAIR WATER PIPE '., VENT_FANSINGLEDUCT __, _'- - _'... MECHANICAL -01-000-4224- EACH VACUUM BREAKER-----'.., - MECHEXHAUST _-HOOD/DUCTS'.-I - MOBILEHOME ,-01-000-4225 WATERSOF,TNER _. .'- _' RELOCATION OFEAFURNACE/HEATER ",-. MOBILEHOMEPARKINSP '--. -.'- EACH ROOF DRAIN (INSIDE)- _'-,•• . -- SOLAR .. _'-01-000-4226- -- -. - __- -• -:., ' 'TOTAL MECHANICAL -. -. _._-•_. TOTAL PLUMBING -••' •_'_•_-_ - - , -_"7 STRONG MOTION. - 65-640'0519 - FIRESPRINKLERS -, 01-000-4227 - -•- __-- 5- - - - , ' - , • • -,, • ': ' . -• - PUBLICFACILITIESFEE __25'000-4933 QTY. - 'ELECTRICAL" PERMIT . ISSUE, '' __--,•' QTY -.--, ---'.'- '•-, - 'SOLAR - ISSUE '- BRIDGE _FEE -- NEW.CONSTEAAMP/SWT/BKR _• . - • COLLECTORS ___- _, '-, SCHOOL. FEE 'DISTRICT 1PH i'"'''3-PH '-'V___' ,- , STORAGE TANKS Carlsbad "'*' _''-'65-623-0519'' EXIST BLDG EA AMP/SWT/BKR ROCK STORAGE Encinitas ___65624_0519 i - - 1PH -.-3 PH_ •-.,, - .••,' -- PUMP _'---"-•- -San Djegujto -•,65-625'0519 ' - REMODEL/ALTER"ER_CIRCUIT " ' ". - PLAN CHECKFEE '-" -'' San Marcos _',65'626-0519 'TE-MPPOLE-200 AMPS -,'_'"._' ',-'' '' . ' ''"-. '•,. '.' _. __- OVE R200AMPS - ___' __.. V. TEMP-OCCUPANCY (30 DAYS).-'--5.- TOTAL ELECTRICAL' TOTAL SOLAR TOTAL FEES PAYABLE HAVE - I HAVE CAREFULLY EXAMINED THE COMPLETED "APPLICATION AND PERMIT' AND DO HEREBY Expiration, Every permit ' AN OSHA PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR EXCAVATIONS OVER shall UNDER-PENALTY OF PERJURY'THAT ALL INFORMATION HEREON INCLUDING THE Code ire by limitation a to budding or work -'authorized DECLARATIONS ARE TRUE AND CORRECT AND I FURTHER CERTIFY AND AGREE IF A PERMIT IS permit, or if the building or work allthorizedby such permit is suspended or STRUCTURES GVER 3 STORIES IN HEIGHT ISSUED: TO COMPLY'WITH ALL CITYnCOUNTY AND STATE LAWS GOVERNING BUILDING CONS abandoned atanytimearIheworkiscommencedforaperiodof180days- STRUCTION, by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such 50" DEEP AND DEMOLITION OR CONSTRUi APPROVED BY - - - ;, . ANU- OWNER 0 WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE INDEMNIFY APAIxKEEP DAT J HARMLESS TI'fE Cfl'Y OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABIU1]ES, JUDGMENTS COSTS AND -CONTRACTOR -, -EXPENSES AINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF :~~ INSPECTION TYPE DATE INSPECTOR BUILDING FOUNDATION REINFORCED STEEL MASONRY GUNITE OR GROUT FLOOR '& CEILING SUB FRAME I SHEATHING FRAME EXTERIOR LATH INSULATION INTERIOR LATH & DRYWALL PLUMBING SEWER AND BL/CO PLUMBING UNDERGROUND PLUMBING TOP OUT TUB AND SHOWER PAN GAS TEST ELECTRICAL TEMPORARY POWER ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND . ROUGH ELECTRIC ELECTRIC SERVICE BONDING CI'-e..i/4 G. F. I. - SMOKE DETECTOR MECHANICAL DUCT & PLEM., REF. PIPING HEAT - AIR COND. - SOLAR SYSTEMS VENTILATING SYSTEMS 1, Y CALL FOR FINAL INSPECT/ON L.k'HEN.'ALLAPPROPRIATE ITEMS ABOVE HA VE BEEN -APPROVED. JOB SITE FINAL . () PLUMBING ELECTRICAL MECHANICAL 1,11 GAS BUILDING SPECIAL CONDITIONS CERTOF OCCUPANCY ISSUED I i7 4 - FIELD INSPECTION RECORD - REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS INSPECTORS NOTES . INSPECTION REQ. IF CHECKED INSPECTOR'S APPROVAL DATE -- c PRIOR TO FOUNDATION INSP SOILS COMPLIANCE - - - STRUCTURAL CONCRETE OVER 2000 PSI PRESTRESSED CONCRETE POST TENSIONED CONCRETE . S FIELD WELDING HIGH STRENGTH BOLTS SPECIAL MASONRY i_I PILES'CAISSONS ZZ - . . -: * . * - - . • - --. . -• 0 -- -:Y . -- -------____ i ,. - - •. -. * 0 I hereby affirm that I am licensed junder ' o provisions of Chapter 9 (commencing with - Section 7000) of Division '3 of the Business -cl,,.,- and Professions Code, and my license is In - - full force and effect. Z Lic. No.--Class 8- --- . -* . . - I hereby affirm that I afff exempt from the Con. - . tractors License Law for the followingreason.(Sec. 70315 Business and Professions Code: Any city or county which requires a permit to construct alter, improve, demolish, or repair any structure. prior to its issuance alsorequires the applicant for - Such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Con- ' tractor's.License Law (ChapterS commencing with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Pro-fessions Code) or that is exempt therefrom and the 1 basis for the alleged exemption. Any.niolation of Section 7031.5 by an applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars ($500). -- , 0 I, as owner of the property,' or my 'employees. with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work, and the structure is notintended or offered for ' sate (Sec. 7044,, Business: and Professions Code: sat The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an . Z owner of property who builds or improves thereon and who does such work himself or through his own 0 employees. provided.that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale.lf, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden - I ,of proving that he did not build or improve for the - purposeotsaIeI.-..,, - U) , 'Q I. as owner of'lhe property, am exclusively Z - , A contracting with licensed contractors to construct. — ' . the project (Sec. 7044. Business and Professions . Code: The Contractors License Law does not apply yr. - . to an owner of properly who builds or improves I .t thereon, and who contracts for each projects with a •'• r O,,yaCforfs) license pursuanl to the Contractor's License Law). - .0 Iam exempt underSec, ,B.&P.C. _for this reason ' ' " • ' •- - I' ,f ' - iv •.- 4 - '— - ''' .:- - _.. .•,.. . - • t, I hereby affirm that I hase a certificate of consent ' , to self-insure, or a certificate of Workers' Compensation Insurance, or a certified copy thereof - ' ISec. 3. Labor Code). POLICY 'Copy is filed with the city. Z - LIJ 0 Certified copy is hereby furnished. - CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION FROM S. WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE - )This section need not be completed if the permit- is for one hundred dollars ($100) or less) - . .o.l certify that in the performance 01 the work for 0 . which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any ' person' in any manner so as to become subject to ,j the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. NOTICE TO APPLICANT: If. alter making this Certi 01 Exemption, you should become subject tb . , toe Workers' Compensation provisions 01 the Labor Code, you must forthwith comply with. Such - . . provisions or this permit shall be deemed revoked. . .- :° IJTT-- Dl hereby affirm thatthere is a construction cc I lending agency tO, the performance 01 the work for . which this permit is issued ISec. 3097, Civil Code). ZI •A.T - Lender's Name 1 ' •l L Lender's Address .- -' ;' ' ,,• - • , .., - • . '- - ' .,- '-• USEBALL POINT PEN ONLY & PRESS HARD . • . , ' APPLICANT TO. FILL IN INFORMATION WITHIN SHADED AREA AND DECLARATIONS. CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT- APPLICATION & PERMIT 1200 Elm, Carlsbad, California 92008 (714) 438-5525 • ' . . .. , _____________________ oe AV. ST. DATE F APPLICATIONS . BUSINESS LICENSE # cs- (U. ' .0 RD. 9/,Iez] •2 OWNER'S NAME ' OWNER'S PHONE PRIME CONTRACTOR ° CONTRACTORS PHONE C Ti V6Vo \ '. 4 7i - VALUATION - "..• . PERMIT NUMBER ______ ZONE :'-.; -' OWNER'S MAILING ADDRESS . - - wvz F1- ILlØOa-4 p, ck.L •t70 CONTRACTOR'S ADDRESS Lt" LICENSE NO. _______ PLAN I.D. At . •. - BLDG USE CODE v - L& 8L0 K SUBDIVISION eJORK ASSESSOR PARCEl. NO. • - - DESIGNER ' L. ct2) - STATE LICENSE # - STANDARD PLAN # • - • BUILDING SQ. FOOTAGE - - . .;'- DESCRIPTION DESIGNER'S ADDRESS 447 . F/P 'FLRELEV. • , NO STORIESo - YO NO - - OCCGP' EDU .. '. . - , DESIGNER'S PHONE -- ' q?! - - -. " - -:.'' ,x.x • . . ' - S - • - •• . • 'Nor Va/id UnIshchine Certified .• -- I -. ' • tOtOOO.F .1719C_7, /-L(&l!Iyf1_-'- A. CENSUS TRACT - GP LAND USE ' PAR r'JG SPACE . • RES UNITS GRADING PERMIT ISSUED ' "' ' . D ND • REDEVELOPMENT , AREA - - • yD,D . ' .,'- . TYPE CONST- • • 0CC LOAD - - FIRE SPR '•• vO D QTY PLUMBING PERMIT ISSUE '1 C f,vo_, O QTY -. MECHANICAL PERMIT ISSUE . SUMMARY/ACCOUNT NUMBER EACH FIXTURE TRAP •% ' - . - INSTALL FURN. DUCTS (JPTO 100,000 BTU . BUILDING PERMIT • ' 01-000-4220 .' 'EACH BUILDING SEWER - -. - . . , - , . - OVER 100,000 BTU. - ' • - SIGN PERMIT - 01-000-4221 EACH WATER HEATER ANOIOR,VENT • - , , ' BOILER/COMPRESSOR UP TO 3 HP •O, • - • - "PLAN CHECK - - 01-000-4806 . - -• - EACH GAS SYSTEM 1 104 OUTLETS - . BOILER/COMPRESSOR 3-15 HP . - , TOTAL PLUMBING • 01:000.4222 . • - EACH GAS SYSTEM 5 OR MORE •' .. • - -, ,- : METAL FIREPLACE ELECTRICAL4. , - 01-000-4223 EACH INSTAL.. ALTER, REPAIR WATER PIPE ' . .. ' VENT FAN SINGLE DUCT r, :. - - • - MECHANICAL - : 01-000-4224 EACH VACUUM BREAKER '-- - ' - ' , - MECH EXHAUST - HOOD/DUCTS , •' . - - - MOBILEHOME r , 01'000.4225 WATER SOFTNER - . : T"7' RELOCATION OF EA FURNACE/HEATER ' . MOBILEHOME PARK INSP SEACH ROOF DRAIN (INSIDE) - - . , -:-- , . , ' -- . -, , - - SOLAR - . - - 01 -00074226 -- - -, '. • -.- - -- - - - . - i' - - 'TOTAL MECHANICAL ' - ' .. -' I • -. ' -; . - . -' STRONG MOTION. - . 65-640-0519 TOTAL PLUMBING . . . . - FIRE SPRINKLERS - . 01-000-4227 - — QTY. .S - ' - - - • '; ELECTRICAL FERMIT- ISSUE .,t'- a ' QTY , * - t ', 'SOLAR'. ISSUE - ,. - PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE 25-000-4933 BRIDGE FEE ' "• ' - - NEW.CONST EAAMP/SWT/BKR - . s"- ' - COLLECTORS - . . ' • - SCHOOL FEE- DISTRICT ''. 1PH ' . "' ' - 'c 3-PH . . .• .- STORAGE TANKS' - '- • Carlsbad - - .65-623-0519 - - - ' EXIST BLOG.EA AMP/SWT/BKR - - ' - - .' - -_ , ROCK STORAGE ' - . - --• - - • Encinitas - ,,.' 65-624-0519' - • -- - — 1 PH - 3 PH - • .. - PUMP - - • San Dieguito -- - 65-625-0519 REMODEL/ALTER PER CIRCUIT - - - - PLAN CHECKFEE __---- ••• '.'--. San Marcos _-_65-626-0519 TEMP POLE200 AMPS -' ___ "'''/""' - _1' _- -..'•.' - __ ' - . OVER 200 AMPS _.,.- _._. ,y TEMPOCCUPANCY(30DAYS) _'- TOTAL ELECTRICAL-t TOTAL SOLAR TOTAL FEES PAYABLE I I HAVE CAREFULLY EXAMINED THE COMPLETED "APPLICATION AND PERMIT" AND DO HEREBY Expiration. Every permit issued by the Building Official under the provisions olfhis * AN OSHA i'€rr IS REQUIRED FOR EXCAVATIONS OVER CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT ALL INFORMATION HEREON INCLUDING THE Code shall expirebYn .5.01, and become null and void. if the building or work DEEP AND DfUOuTN OR CONSTRUCTION OF DECLARATIONS ARE TRUE AND CORRECT AND I FURTHER CERTIFY AND AGREE IF A PERMIT IS authorized by h permit is I commenced within 180 days from the date of such STRUCTURFS OVER 3 STORIES IN HEIGHT permit. or it the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or ISSUED: TO COMPLY WITH ALL CITY, COUNTY AND STATE LAWS GOVERNING BUILDING CON- abandoned at any time after the work is commenced for a period of 180 dave. ' ND 'S SIGN C1 CONTRACTOR K ED BY. D STRUCTION, WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE INDEMNIFY A '5W 7P'PR KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND f EXPENS ES WHICH MAY IN ANY GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF TH BY PHONE 0 INSPECTION TYPE DATE INSPECTOR BUILDING FOUNDATION REINFORCED STEEL MASONRY GUNITE OR GROUT FLOOR & CEILING SUB FRAME SHEATHING FRAME EXTERIOR LATH INSULATION INTERIOR LATH & DRYWALL -- _ PLUMBING SEWER AND BL/CO - PLUMBING UNDERGROUND PLUMBING TOP OUT TUB AND SHOWER PAN GAS TEST ELECTRICAL TEMPORARY POWER ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND I ROUGH ELECTRIC ELECTRIC SERVICE BONDING 4 I G. F. I. - SMOKE DETECTOR I MECHANICAL DUCT & PLEM.; REF. PIPING HEAT - AIR COND. - SOLAR SYSTEMS VENTILATING SYSTEMS 11 CALL FOR FINAL INSPECTION LVHEN ALL APPROPRIATE ITEMS ABOVE HA yE! BEEN APRAVED.- JOB SITE FINAL i,n, V PLUMBING V I s ELECTRICAL MECHANICAL .5 GAS BUILDING - SPECIAL CONDITIONS CERT OF OCCUPANCY ISSUED '--: FIELD INSPECTION RECORD REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS INSPECTOR'S NOTES INSPECTION REQ. IF CHECKED INSPECTOR'S APPROVAL o ATE PRIOR TO FOUNDATION INSP SOILS COMPLIANCE OVER 2000 PSI STRUCTURAL CONCRETE CONCRETE PRESTRESSED . POST TENSIONED - CONCRETE FIELD WELDING HIGH STRENGTH BOLTS . SPECIAL MASONRY . PILES'CAISSONS . ____________ • - • - _____- . ..-. I -. = .5 •- .• - . ____________________________ ____________ __________________ ___________ _J -— -.5 -.•_ .. -A - ' - City rofCàrIsbadt4 : MISCELLANEOU J ' 1200 ELMCARLSBADCA 92008 • TEL. (714) 438-5525k ' RECEIPT Job Addrss jq 12 4g4i ,Q4 MISCELLANEOUS FEERPT *,PLAN CHECK FEE 32 Mailing Address - D VALUATION E DEMOLITION*; El HOUSE MOVING PARKS AND RECREATION FEE * . [I] PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE_______________________ SCHOOL FEE DISTRICT___________________ ci ' Contractor . 'Address 4~1Q xJ-t- 1 — '4 . . Z' Tel -. . State Lic. •. - /' City S Ciassuf. ;z.c-74;zj7 A q... (3,, Lic No f [11 Carlsbad Encinitas • COMPLETE FOR PLANCHECK ONLY-' __________ ç . - •. ., - . ,_.i LEGAL DESCRIPTION El San Diego -LI San Marcos - PARCEL_ NO, .4 'ASSESSORS DESCRIPTION OF WORK t....• - _. _.- . _____•1-11L,.,. A. PLAN ID NO.' El uIs**.. t - ET__. - fl t.-1 •• •• 4 DESIGNER ADDRESS 1'7Q .1S L4__ '_4 '• PHONE- _______- El' - -. -. --.c- _,,• __--.TOTALFEE $ •• . --f.'.- CONTACTPERSON WARNING: PLAN CHECK FEES. WHERE NO ACTION IS TAKEN --APPLICANT IN 180 DAYS AND NO BUILDING PERMIT IS ISSUED, FORFEITED To THE CITY BY THE FEE ARE - . .. ./ 4. •-• k _;2t;;;:,_..• _- COMMENTS: -. - . ' 'Y , Signature of Applicant White - Applicant '- YeIloLFile,' t. Pink 1-'(1) Finance .(2)Data Process Gold - Assessor Lo 4" . . • '%, ., I - - '—i.--.---,•-, - 4.4 .d.- *'4 ",j4..' .. - / V . APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONNECT TO CITY-SEWER SYSTEM. CITY OF CARLSBAD SE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 438-5541 U I SSUED BY FOR APPLICANT TO FILL IN p DATE ISSUED BUILDINrz ... I - - ADDRESS (-i1. tAkRt . VALIDATION OWNER \fv _4 MAILING ADDRESS - t I . - LATERAL CHARGE COMPUTATION STANDARD 4" (Max. H. 30. V. 101 OVER 30 H. FT. CONTRACTOR / ' '- CONTRACTOR'S - OVER 10'V.-@ ______ FT. 7L/4 --1 ADDRESS STANDARD 6" (Max. H. 30', V. 10) OVER 30' H. ______ _______ FT. OVER 10' V. -@-FT. TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST j NEW BUILDING I EXISTING BUILDING LEGAL DESCRIPTION SERVICE CHARGE (REPAVING ETC.) TOTAL LATERAL CHARGE <V < REMARKS: j J LINE COST DATA ASSESSMENT DIST. NO. FRONTAGE -COST PER FT. _______TOTAL OTHER LATERAL LOCATION I C~CCONNECTION FEE /' -' L NO. UNITS . COST PER UNIT . TOTAL PUMP STATION FEES NO. UNITS -COST COST PER UNIT-TOTAL- ST. TOTAL CHARGES (LATERAL ETC.) LATERAL NO. ______________ INSTALLATION DATE WHITE: Engineering GREEN: Finance YELLOW: Sanitation PINK: Building GOLDENROD: Permitter ,-- .--,, -- ,- ............................ 1 lttitp of qcarItjab REQUEST FOR INSPECTION RECORD , __ TIME: INSPECTOR —,P ERMIT NO. _____________________ DATE: - OWNER 10, ADDRESS 7(_4, fl1 REQUESTED BY , p PHONE NO. PERSON TAKING REPORT - BUILDING 'FOUNDATION 'REIN FORCING STEEL E'-MASONRY E) GROUT - GUNITE O FLOOR AND CEILING SUB FRAME O SHEATHING 0 ROOF'D SHEAR 0. FRAME EXTERIOR LATH O INSULATION 0 INTERIOR LATH OR DRYWALL 0 FINAL PLUMBING O UNDERGROUND PLUMBING 0 SEWER AND PL/CO O TOP OUT PLUMBING TUB OR SHOWER PAN GAS TEST 0 WATER HEATER, SOLAR.WATER 0 FINAL MISCELLANEOUS 0 CONDITIONED AIR SYSTEMS O SOLAR HEAT O PATIO O POOL 0 SPA DSIGN -D GRADING 0 DRIVEWAY • 0 FINAL ELECTRICAL O TEMPORARY SERVICE DUFFERGROUND 0 ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND 0 ROUGH ELECTRIC 0 POOL BONDING O ELECTRIC SERVICE o FINAL 0 Wednesday • 0 Thursday 0 Friday SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS Ready For Inspection: 0 Monday 0 Tuesday 0 A.M. 0 P.M. . Qtit' at CarIMib REQUEST FOR INSPECTION RECORD BUILDING ,N ELECTRICAL 0 TEMPORARY SERVICE o UFFER GROUND o ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND o ROUGH ELECTRIC 0 POOL BONDING O ELECTRIC SERVICE o FINAL ---- INSPECTOR PERMIT NO. DATE: OWNER ADDRES REQUESTED By PHONENO. PERSON TAKING REPORT O FOUNDATION 0 REINFORCING STEEL O MASONRY 0 GROUT - GUNITE O FLOOR AND CEILING SUB FRAME 0 SHEATHING 0 ROOF 0 SHEAR 0 FRAME O EXTERIOR LATH O INSULATION 0 INTERIOR LATH OR DRYWALL 0 FINAL PLUMBING O UNDERGROUND PLUMBING O SEWER AND PL/CO 0 TOP OUT PLUMBING 0 TUB OR SHOWER PAN: GAS TEST D,WATER HEATER D SOLAR WATER FINAL MISCELLANEOUS O CONDITIONED AIR SYSTEMS O SOLAR HEAT PATIO D POOL' OSPA DSIGN - GRADING O DRIVEWAY - 0 FINAL • - SPECIAL INSTRUCTION a /1( Ready For Inspection: 0 Monday 0 Tuesday 0 A.M. 0 P.M. • 0 Wednesday ,, Thursday -01. Friday / (lCitp of (CarItiab REQUEST FOR INSPECTION RECORD INSPECTOR PERMIT NO DATE// OWNER (') ADDRESS 71 O (1 pL.i. r?L REQUESTED BY c 1 1 1' PHONE NO. PERSON TAKING REPORT t S I BUILDING O FOUNDATION REINFORCING STEEL O MASONRY GROUT - GUNITE 01 FLOOR AND CEILING SUB FRAME SHEATHING 0 ROOF 0 SHEAR /- D FRAME 0 EXTERIOR LATH O INSULATION O INTERIOR LATH OR DRYWALL FINAL ELECTRICAL TEMPORARY SERVICE O UFFER GROUND O ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND O ROUGH ELECTRIC O POOL BONDING O ELECTRIC SERVICE o FINAL PLUMBING MISCELLANEOUS O UNDERGROUND PLUMBING o CONDITIONED AIR SYSTEMS O SEWER AND PL/CO O SOLAR HEAT O TOP OUT PLUMBING 0 PATIO O TUB OR SHOWER PAN• 0 POOL OSPA 0 GAS TEST DSIGN O WATER HEATER O GRADING I I O SOLAR WATER O DRIVEWAY • • FINAL o FINAL SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS Ready For U 0A.M. 0 0 Monday. -- uesda 0 Wednesday 0 Thursday 0 Friday A,.C- E2e 6)1 Q1itp of QCarIbab REQUEST FOR INSPECTION RECORD TIME: INSPECTOR _____ PERMIT NO. DATE: OWNER ADDRESS p P d L REQUESTED BY PHONE NO. PERSON TAKING REPORT BUILDING FOUNDATION REIN FORCING STEEL D MASONRY .0 GROUT - GUNITE O FLOOR AND CEILING SUB FRAME O SHEATHING 0 ROOF 0 SHEAR O FRAME 0 EXTERIOR LATH O INSULATION O INTERIOR LATH OR DRYWALL FINAL ELECTRICAL O TEMPORARY SERVICE O UFFER GROUND O ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND O ROUGH ELECTRIC O POOL BONDING - E ELECTRIC SERVICE 0 FINAL PLUMBING MISCELLANEOUS 0 UNDERGROUND PLUMBING 0 CONDITIONED AIR SYSTEMS O SEWER AND PL/CO O SOLAR HEAT O TOP OUT PLUMBING .0 PATIO - O TUB OR SHOWER PAN 0 POOL 0 SPA O GAS TEST - OSIGN • O WATER HEATER O GRADING O SOLAR WATER O DRIVEWAY - FINAL 0 FINAL SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS Ready For Inspection: 0 Monday - 0 Tuesday 0 Wednesday 0 Thursday 0 Friday 0 A. M. 0 P.M. e ,.-. DEVELOPMENTAL 1200 ELM AVENUE SERVICES CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 - O Assistant City Manager (714) 438-5596 - a 0 'Building Department - ' - .• •- •, ' (714)4385525 Cttp of tarWbabl Engineering Depa -,ent (714) 438-5541 . : - - - - '• . .' .• -. Housing & Redevelopment Department (714)4385611 Planning Department . (7.14) 438-5591 '• -. . .. • • '. -. - '•••-• " • • - - ' . - - December 30, 1982 Dear tr. Vallas, :In regard to your- project at 2208 Palomar 'AirortRd, a hangar, Emile Plude advised me to let you know that the proper address is 2206 Palomar Airport Rd. 1 have corrected all our papers here •in the files in the '. • office' and I 'knew you would, like to do' the same with any documents, you have whi,cft' would. need the same, corrections. '' ' - ' 7 . • •.,-. '• Building Department - ' •; - - ' • • • ' ' ' ' 'a, -' -- ' ' ' .' ' . • ' - . ' • •'' - ••. - •• ' , 0 4 PLANS / C 2 To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each circled item, the sheet of the-plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this check sheet with the revised plans. T0o~ 2 x -te CIL1L BJIAf AAtC&( enek,(t( e n I L \i Wt oj4t (5e9c5) JURISDICTION: DATE F PROJECT ADDRESS:4O8 TO: rit,' plans received by jurisdiction______________ te plans received by plan checker-760- Date initial plan check completed by F(REWORO: PLEASE READ Plan check is limited to technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the handicapped. The plan check is based on regulations enforced by the Building Inspection Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The items circled below need clarification, modification or change. All circled items have tc be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 303 (c). 1979 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the -plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. Plan Check No. 9315 - C-2i7 _<~~) Citp at QCartbab PLAN CORRECTION SHEET 0166. UP R 910 No WJJJJ A4 NEW, WIN 31 ~W - -L - Grot= Krud a a f,4zogg, - V I ReIRWORM AI I • 4l W, Nii M MA ! ia t a PW NOWN Walp'", _____ IAg MET XRWA&5,41~ MEN R11 I - LICANT COPY CITY COPY PLAN CHECKER COPY V V ,V V - V 4 jP ate (!!~u C_~ '/1 UJurlsdlctlon_______________ Prepa VSd byIVf.E3 Bldg. Dept. VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE Esgil V(: VV+V •V4V •V ••V• V ?,.V 'V PLA'?JCHECK NO - BUILDING ADDRS ' APPLICANT/CONTACT 2u V422( PHONE NO. -3133 3/3_3 BUILDING OCCUPANCY - 4"3 * -DESIGNER PHONE " TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION V-V CONTRACTOR PHONE____/' I V V BUILDING PORTION - BUILDING AREA V V• VALUATION. !,VALUE V V •V •V V MULTIPLIER V V •• ____________ V•V V - - - V Res. Baths (over 3) V Y @2,200 V V V Res.Firep1aces(° V @. 1,760 'V V V V Air-Condition i`ng • V V V Commercial V V• V 2.80 V V V V V Residential V • .• •. 2. 40 •• V Res. or Comm. )rWt' / V V • Fire SDrinklers :1.50 Tot a1 Va1ue V 000 • ) V Adjustment for State(. V 0 Ma ccess Regulations- 60 Ma 8uZnq Permit Fee$x 1.065 065 $ V (Z 6tO —:; • - • V V V V V - V V V V V 8/4/82 - V V •••• - V VV V lc'i,?izO/ /570 Sv b9 ec: 7eoae Qitp of CarIbab JURISDICTION: C22 oC' DATEI*2 PROJECT ADDRESS: 1I..fl'//9l.' TO: D APPLICANT COPY 0 PLAN CHECKER COPY /s 3. LWL'flOJ 5-p) S-u 1TIC,I:.IQE.D (9.) WILL i6f uQ(J 7r —4 -- wjic rioi (1. i1 10 ZG (DC)' 6 rL. CaEOLA-3 G cziii( .'err. d hi- t0Y2. *( _____ UFfl(.VU 89 ,4e , V/10 SOI L-S ___ o1) Zb QI rocdOclL3 l) (.&.tZ j4m fl & Q :SOILS 13 () C—LA 12 L1&41—V(5)U11L-T,OY1) 4c! S6i1i01 Sec- 90 (T '3 -• L.V ,'c3) ___ 'ULL i1\LtZ(fQ PLAN CORRECTION SHEET Plan Chock No._____________________________ plans røceived by jurisdiction te plans received by plan checkork."' Date initial plan check completed /-0i. by7't1 FnREWOROt PLEASE READ Plan check is limited to technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code. Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the handicapped. The plan check is based on regulations enforced by the Building Inspection Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The items circled below need clarification, modification or change. All circled items have tc be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulation.. Per Sec. 303 (C). 1979 Uniform Building Code. the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. h. PLANS Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of print., and any original plan sets that may have been returned to you by the jurisdiction. to: To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each circled item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this check sheet with the revised plans. PLAN ( fll:(K No. OWI4ER DATE REC'D DATE CHECKED CHECKED BY md -Y(,iö) 2O)UXE CI\L JOIiJ. -O49t.; wrr14 -iii9 C 1J SE- 3tc) G 1I (2&Gczw 11-lecAlot its LIZ.0 A- ___ ___ 'SI&t.) .-nOTQ Pfl'JO I1L k? Zot w -i-i*-r '/A4.0 cowl - D =)661ZS LJ IUL COW-td 33p3Cc), "67e Th Wr Lu ,iL) C ji\)O fl41 ) C W) pr ot L& ui So ockC-k Uyc - - -14\G 'r1rr-- fl ..--C4 C . . OT1flJ ( L)p L10Q aE)S\nO hQ 5i.5 Pri) uci Pni,c £L- Lj ri2 cOY1 fô us -+1- YflQ4rt1pO I c'1' , - S)LAJ r ocAa+ flG/ ___ t\'JDCA oW 'Lco2 VI&44 .tQe1 \3w-OiiiX,r t-t. \ C!) i. ('00)e9. 'kQ 5ub t 1j+ 21- i -r cfr- __ ç: eoM O tôoE'.. OOU/Wr./SQfrL"r2. ,-t.eo4ef)I O reLccthoQ t_4) 1) CLA12I icT-- A (T 1J1ZLI..) LOD \yO VzonpecajCs Dates _;2 Jurisdiction________________ Prep ad by* Bldg. Dept. VALUATION AND, PLAN CHECK FEE E3 Esgil I PLACHECK NO. BUILDING ADDRESS g % APPLICANT/CONTACT 2?iu- PHONE NO.-7W- BUILDING OCCUPANCY j4".3 - DESIGNER PHONE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION j/-A/ CONTRACTOR PHONE BUILDING PORTION BUILDING AREA VALUATION MULTIPLIER VALUE -- Res. Baths (over 3) @2,200 Res.Firep1aces(°' @ 1,760 Air _Conditioning Commercial - - 2_80 Residential - .@_2.40 Res. or Comm. FireSorinklers @1.50 Total Value Adjustment for StateL CA aedt$8nd 5 O ss Regulations - Building Permit Fee .065 Plan Check Fee $ _.065 $ COMMENTS: 0 0•• 8/4/82 'V. INTERDEPARTMENTAL INFORMATION SH EEl. 1.) 1 - UIid:ng Dep, SAN MARCOS -- ENCINITAS CARLSBAD V 'UNITS REQ'D: V PROVIDED: V V1 •. ,/r , %COVERAGE' ALLOWED: PROVIDED: PARKING SPACES REQtD: PROVIDED: BUILDING HEIGH1 RLQ'D PROVIDED V FRONT 'SETBACK •' SIDE SETBACK ALLOWED: V PROVIDED: '1 INTRUSIONS: RE-1)EVELOPMENT APPROVAL REQ'D LANDSCAPE & IRRIGATION PLAN COMMENTS: / vIRONMENTAL PROTECTION REQ ,Kc/MPT ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: OK TO ISSUE:NJ V DATE: g/dIOK TO FINAL: V DATE: INEERING DEPARTMENT V . R.O.W: ' I11PROV 11'ENTS: PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE: SEWER CONNECTION': V DR IVEWAY LOCATION(S): GRADING PERMIT: EASEMENTS:' DRAINAGE: V 1AL DESCRIPTION: V ATIONAL COMMENTS: V V V V . - "CHLCK IF ENGINEERING INSPECTI N REQ'D ON FINAL TO ISSUE:DATE: fZS7PWI: ' OK TO FINAL: 'DATL A. ....... * .* * * * * * * * * •J* * * " L& 3LU V * IF THIS ITEM IS NOT CHECKED, BUILDING DEPARTMENT WILL MAKE FINAL INSPECTION. ' BIJJLDIF4G_DEPARIMENI / BUILDING ADDRESS: O A.P.N: - 73-' ,. C.T:/vo I : PLANNINIIEPRINENI ZONE: /V\ SCHOOL FEES: SAN DIEGUITO rtment REAR SETBACK -I- -a - - - -' y T' - r 4 L______ (DEARD (714)566-7210 9903 BUSINESS PARK AVENUE - SAN DIEGO, CA 92131 JOB - - SHEET NO -OF SCALE - CALCULATED BY - : DATE _CHECKED BY DATE - • ,.' . . . GLULAM BEAM DESIGN BEAM: VALLAS HANGAR B-H ROOF" L'ORDS'(TRIBUTRRY WIDTH--20.-00 FEET) ... - UNIT DEAD LOAD = 12.4 PSF r' A )s#IQ. UNIT LIVE LORD = 20.0 PSF (REDUCED TO 12.0) Wdead = .25 W'I I ye = .2 Nt Ct al = .49 KIPS PER FOOT MAIN SPAN 100 2D. FEET f C SE ML MC MR VLL . VLR ' VRL VRR RL RR I - 310.0 0.0 0.0 12.4 12.4 0.0 12.4 12.4 2 0.0 310.0 ' 0.0 0.0 12.4 12.4 0.0 12.4 12.4 3 10.0 0.0 610.0 0.0 0.0 24.4 24.4 0.0 24.4 24.4 4 D 0.0 0.0 310.0 0.0 0.0 12.4 12.4 0.0 12.4 12.4 5 610.0 0.0 0.0 24.4 , 24.4 0.0 24.4 24.4 6 0.0 ' 310.0 , 0.0 0.0 12.4 12.4 '0.0 12.4 12.4 7 0.0 610.0 0.0 0.0 24.4 24.4 ' 0.0 24.4 24.4 8 0.0 610.0 0.0 0.0 24.4 24.4 0.0 24.4 24.4 MAX 0.0 610.0 0.0 0.0 24.4 24.4 . 0.0 24.4 24.4 DESIGN DATA: Fbg.PSI, Va=165_PSI, STRESS INCREASE=25 DESIGN MOMENT =610.0 FT-KIPS, DESIGN SHEAR = 24.4 KIPS MEMBER REQUIRED: 8.750 X 45.00 (S=2953.1 IN-3, Cf'= .863) DESIGN CONTROLLED BY FLEXURE BENDING STRESS: fb=24?9<2400x1.25x .863=2590 Cs ' SHEAR STRESS : v 86<165x1.25=206 (_ ,92po CAMBER: 7.144 IN, RADIUS OF CURVATURE: 2100 FEET (1.5xDead) - - ' - - 3x.Cs°X'2- -. Iv-'i- k 'Ps i 2ox fS ' Cc, GLULAM BEAM DESIGN • ' • • ' ' BEAM:VALLRS HANGAR H.1 awfOp . ROOF LOADS (TRIBUTARY WIDTH =11.75 FEET) • UNIT DEAD LORD = 29.5 PSF . • ' UNIT LIVE LOAD = 28.0 PSF (REDUCED TO 12.0) • . /' 1? Wdead = .35 Wlive = .14 Wtotal = .49 KIPS PER FOOT Pleft = 0.00 KIPS Pright= 0.00 KIPS LEFT CANTILEVER :10.00 FEET (SUPPORTING A SPAN OF 0.00 FEET) MAIN SPAN :80.00 FEET RIGHT CANTILEVER: 10.00 FEET (SUPPORTING A SPAN, OF 0.00 FEET) CASE ML MC MR VLL VLR VRL VRR RL RR 1 17:. 3. 260.8 17.3 3.5 '13.9 13.9 3.5 17.3 17.3 2 24.4 256.5 17.3 ' 4.9 14.0 13.8 3.5 18.8.,;' 17.2 3 17.3 372.8 17.3 .3. 5 19.5 19.5 3.5 23.0 • 23.0 4 17.3 256.5 24.4 3.5 13.8 14.0 4.9 17.2 - " 18.8 5 24,4 369.3 17.3 , 4.9 .19.6 19.4 3.5 24.5 22.9 6 24.4 252.9 24.4 4.9 13.9 13.9 . 4.9 18.7 18.7 7 17.3 • 369.3 24.4 ' 3.5 . 19.4 19.6 4.9 22.9 24.5 8 24.4. 365.7 24.4 4.9 19.5 19.5 4.9 24.4 24.4 MAX 24.4 372.8 , 24.4 4.9 19.6 19.6 4.9 24.5 24.5 DESIGN DATA: Fb=2408 PSI, Va=165 PSI, STRESS INCRERSE=25 • DESIGN MOMENT =372.8 FT-KIPS, DESIGN SHEAR = 19.6 KIPS MEMBER REQUIRED: 8.750,X 34.50 (S=1735.8 IH3, Cf'= .889) • 'DESIGN CONTROLLED BY FLEXURE BENDING STRESS:' fb2577<2408x1.25x .889=2668 SHEAR STRESS : v= 90<165x1.25=206 ' CAMBER: 9.604 IN, RADIUS OF CURVATURE: 1000 FEET (1.5xDead) 3 C. TILT-UP PANEL DESIGN (METHOD OF PCI JOB : VALLAS PANEL: SIDE WALL WALL DATA CLEAR HEIG25.FT PARAPET:2.2 .LOAD DATA (DESIGN WIDTH:1.08 Fl) Pid: .03 (KIPS) . P11: .08 P.2 : 1.42 (KLF) V P3d: 0.00 VP31 8.00 V Qs :0.028 (KSF) Seismic zone:4 Qu :0.015 MATERIAL PROPERTIES V Fc :2.0 (KSI) F :60 V As :8.27 (IH"2 PER FOOT) V ANALYSIS . . CASE 1: 1.4*Dead+1.7*Ljve CASE 2: ..75(1.4*Dead + 1.1 Mu1=Qu*Lc"2*1..5 V Mu2Pu1*ECC V Mu3(Pu1+Pu2)*Def1 CRSE:1 . V. Pu1:0.171 (KIPS)' Pu2:1.985 Phi :0.876 Mn :60.76 (IN-KIPS) Defl:6.92 (IN) . V V • V • V Mul: 8.88 (IN-KIPS) V ,. -•: • • . • V Mu2: .71 • . V Mu3:14.91 Mu :15.62 Phi *Mn:53.23 V V V CRSE:2 • • • V Pu1:8.026 (KIPS) V Pu2:1.489 . V Qu :0.0394 (KSF) V V •.• • V • Phi ':0.883 V • V • V V Mn :58.63 (IN-KIPS) V • V Defl:6.91 (IN) • V V V V Mu1:39.23 (IN-KIPS) V Mu2: .11• V V Mu3:10.47 Mu :49.81 Phi*Mn:51.78 V V V 5 .4 -- -- ,. .. -.4. JOB SHEET NO ______________ OF SCALE I CALCULATED BY __________________________________ DATE - •-.:-.-- . - CHECKED BY DATE 1 1DEARDORFFt1 it 1I ID I (7)566-2O 9903 BUSINESS PARK AVENUE SAN DIEGO. CA 9213 - M. .1 . i P ! ,351S *:: t:.:r..: T ...1. .I It \ I o - .- J_ . t • . '. I 1 IiARD ,lg o (714)566-7210 9903 BUSINESS PARK AVENUE - EDISANDIEGO.CA 92131 --.. -•- JOB SHEET NO OF SCALE CALCULATED BY DATE CHECKED BY DATE__________________ ----i - .... H . -... .... Lo L............. .J 2L . -i . -•- . Z-/t cIE. ri.'1 F-' . -- -- .r - I&1 e011 E 1.1 - JOB. - -• - •--- - .• SHEET NO ___________ OF SCALE CALCULATED BY - - DATE CHECKED BY - DATE W DE D ye"MR a 0 ~ a0l, (714)566-7210 9903 BUSINESS PARK AVENUE SAN DIEGO. CA 92131 - I .•.,.. J-. . - y__- .. •-ç - -- JOB - - - SHEET NO OF SCALE CALCULATED BY - DATE - CHECKED BY - DATE • 4. P(bEARDORFF 11 @I31: I W (714)566.7210 1 9903 BUSINESS PARK AVENUE %SAN DIEGO. CA 92131 -- - .,••-; - • - - H. * . . - :t. ____. * . - + ,p . .& . - IbEM(DORFFL1 (714) 566-7210 9903 BUSINESS PARK AVENUE SAN DIEGO. CA 92131 -. I JOB I - - - SHEET NO - OF - SCALE CALCULATED BY . DATE LCHECKED BY DATE - F L!J (714)5667210 - 9903 BUSINESS PARK AVENUE SAN DIEGO. CA 9231 - JOB - li~ET NO OF Sk SCALE . CALCULATED BY DATE CHECKED BY .DATE - m LL (714)566-7210 9903 BUSINESS PARK AVENUE SAN DIEGO. CA 92131 SHEET NO OF CALCULATED BY CHECKED BY 1 ----- 4.\ .•-- - -' SCALE - • • DATE DATE -i -V ...V,,' H; EXPLORATION, INC. _t GEOTECHNICAL -\J rp L Li ft'- SOIL& FOUNDATION ENGINEERING GROUNDWATER • GEOPHYSICS • ENGINEERING GEOLOGY 29 July 1982' , .5 . 5 . Mr. Doug Staley - '-"- JOB NO. 82-2206 LUSARDI CONSTRUCTION COMPANY . •1 .S • * 1570 Linda Vista Drive . San Marcos, CA 92069 Subject REPORT OF SOIL INVESTIGATION Proposed Hanger/Office Structure Northeast Corner of Palomar Airport Road and Airport Entrance ' Carlsbad,.California '. Dear Mr. Staley: In accordance, with your request; Geotechnical Exploration, Inc. has performed an " • investigation of the surface and subsurface soil conditions at the location of the * subject proposed airplane hanger. The field work was performed on July, 28, 1982 our Field Engineer. -- '- . , S • It is our understanding that the site is being developed to receive an office/airport V hanger structure. The structure is to be a maximum of.two stories in height and will be constructed of standard-type building materials, utilizing conventional, continuous S ' toundations or spread footings. V V V Our investigation revealed the site to be underlain with dense, formational soils which are moderately expansive. A thin veneer of uncompacted fill soils 'overlie portions of the site. rj In our opinion, if the conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are'' V •, implemented during site preparation, the site will, be suited for the proposed develop-. ment. This opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated. Should c'ou have any ques- tions concerning the following report, please do not' hesitate to contact us. Refer- ' V ence to our Job No. 82-2206 will expedite response to your inquiries. V V V V S ,S • Respectfully submitted, V GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION, INC. V RJS/pj Enclosures . • 5S ,. S ' V V , V., •V S , 8145 RONSON ROAD, SUITE H . SAN DIEGO, 'CALIFORNIA 9211172081 . (714) 560-0428 REPORT OF SOIL INVESTIGATION 'Proposed Hanger/Office Structure Northeast Corner of Palomar Airport Road and Airport Entrance Carlsbad, California JOB NO. 82-2206 The following report presents the findings and recommendations of GEOTECI-1ICAL EXPLORATION, INC. for the subject project. SCOPE OF WORK It is our understanding, based on communications with Mr Doug Staley of Lusardi Construction Company, that the site is intended for the construction of an office building attached to an airplane hanger structure The western three-quarters of the proposed structure Will be founded at the existing grade. Imported fill soils will be utilized to raise the grade of the eastern quarter of the proposed structure area The grading supervision and compaction testing of the placed fill soils will be the responsibility of the County of San Diego With the above in mind, the Scope of Work , is briefly outlined as follows 1 Identify and classify the surface and subsurface soils to depths, in conformance with the Unified Soil Classification System (refer to Appendix A) 2 Determine the allowable bearing pressures for the natural ground and the soils to be used in compacted fill based on their shear-strength characteristics and our experience with the soils 3 Recommend treatment for any expansive soils and/or uncompacted fill soils that, if left in- place and unmodified, could result in eventual damages to the ' proposed structure 4 Predict the settlement of the natural-ground soils, as well as recompacted fill soils (recompacted to at least 90 percent of Maximum Dry Density), under the proposed structural loads. Our investigation was conducted on the immediate area of the proposed hanger/office structure.,It is not within the scope of our investigation to determine the soil conditions on other areas of the property (such as the ramp areas) Proposed Hanger/Office Structure Job No. 82-2206 29 July 1982 Page 2 SITE The property is described as: Parcel 81-0963—A of Palomar Airport, according to a map of the Department of Real Property, Connunity Service Agency, County of San Diego, dated October 8, M. The property, consisting of approximately 2.47 acres, is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Palomar Airport Road and the entrance road to Palomar Airport. The property is bordered on the north by an existing hanger and airplane parking area, and on the east by undeveloped property. A cut slope a maximum of 10 feet in height borders the west and south property lines of the site (see Figure No. I for location). The cut possesses an approximate 1.5 horizontal to 1.0 vertical slope ratio. There were no existing structures on the site at the time of our investigation. A.; subsurface sewer main crosses the property. Vegetation on the site consists primarily of scattered grasses and weeds. ' The approximate western half of the property is relatively level. The eastern half slopes gently to moderately to the east. Survey information concerning actual elevations was not available at the time of this investigation. - 0 FIELD Four test trenches were placed on the site, specifically in the area where the proposed structure will be located. The excavations were located in the field by referring to an undated, unreferenced Site Plan prepared by Lusardi 'Construction Company. The O excavations were visually inspected by our Field Engineer, and samples were taken of the predominant soils throughout the field operation. Test excavation logs have been prepared on the basis of our inspection and the results have been summarized on - ' Figure No. II. The predominant soils have been classified in conformance with the Unified Soil Classification System (refer to Appendix A). 0 0 S. Proposed Hanger/Office Structure Job No. 82-2206 29 July 1982 • Page 3 OILS Our investigation revealed the site to be underlain with medium-dense to dense, formational materials consisting of damp, mottled light-gray and rust-brown, clayey, sandy silt. The formational materials are moderately expansive as measured by .the County of San Diego Test for Expansive Soils. . Minor amounts ot uncompacted fill soils overlie portions of the site. These fills' a less than one foot in thickness and consist of brown, silty sands. The fill soils are .- non-expansive as measured by the County of San Diego Test for Expansive Soils. Any natural ground topsoils which may have been present have been removed from the site by a previous grading operation. - - fl S • • GROUND WATER 5 No ground ground water problems were encountered during the course of our field investi- gation and we do not expect significant problems to develop in the future--if the property is developed as presently designed. It should be kept in mind, however, that any required grading operations may change surface drainage patterns and/or reduce • permeabilities due to the derisification of compacted soils. Such changes of surface and subsurface hydrologic conditions plus irrigation of landscaping or significant increases in rainfall, may result in the appearance of minor amounts of surface or .. ., 'near-surface water at locations where none existed previously. The damage from such : - S water is expected to be minor and cosmetic in nature, if good positive drainage is im- plemented at the completion of construction. Corrective action should be taken on a -• site-specific basis if,and when, it becomes necessary. - S LABORATORY TESTS ' S 5 , Laboratory tests were performed on the disturbed and undisturbed soil samples in order to to determine their physical and mechanical properties . and their ability to sup- port the proposed structure. The tollowing tests were conducted on- the sampled S - - - soils: - ,'55 • • S -'- 4 S I -4 8' .. 8 • -._ 8P Proposed HangerOff ice Structure Job No 82-2206 29 July 1982 c - Page 4 S - 1. Moisture Content 0 --. 2.-,' Density Determinations • -, ' - 3. Mechanical Analysis • - Expansion Tests • - Direct Shear Tests S 0 '• .' 6., Consolidation Tests The moisture and density determination relationship on undisturbed soil samples gives qualitative information regarding the. soil strength characteristics and soil conditions to be anticipated during the -future grading operation. The mechanical analysis was performed on selected soils according to A S T M 422-52T The mechanical analysis was used to aid in the classification of the soils - according to the Unified Soil Classification System. - - ..- Expansion values were determined from the County of San Diego Test Method for Expansive Soils Expansive soils are classified as follows 0 to 3 percent Low or Considered Nonexpansive 3 to 6 percent Medium . . . - 6 to 12 percent High. Above 12 percent Very High' -' - •. 0 8 According to the County of San Diego Test for Expansive Soils, -swells of less than ,3 L percent are classified as nonexpansive soils. • -• Direct shear tests were performed upon undisturbed samples in' order to determine the • soil strength and.supporting capacity for the natural-ground soils. The shear tests ' • were made with a constant strain direct shear machine. Specimens to be tested were -, saturated and then sheared under various normal loads without-appreciable drainage Of - -, the samples. • .8 - • 0 .•- - -, . - • - - 0 - - - S S • • - •0 • 4 . • r - 0 . • --5 • . - - - sq 4 • S S - . .-• - - 8 CAN Proposed Hanger/Office Structure Job No. 82-2206 29 July 1982 Page 5 Consolidation Tests were performed on undisturbed natural-ground soils and remolded soils expected to be used in the compacted fills The soils are contained in 1-inch high brass rings and loaded into a consolidometer. The specimens are subjected to increased loads and the resulting consolidations noted4, The consolidation tests aid in determining anticipated settlements of the natural ground under the proposed building loads [ CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The following conclusions and recommendations are based upon the practical field investigations conducted by our firm, and resulting laboratory tests, in conjunction with our knowledge and experience with the soils in the Carlsbad area. 1 The site is underlain with medium-dense to dense, damp, mottled light-gray and rust-brown, silty, very sandy clays The clays were tested and found to possess 4.0 to 6.0 percent swell, as measured by the County of San Diego Test for Expansive Soils..Minor amounts of uncompacted fill soils overlie portions of the proposed structure area (see Figure No I for approximate fill locations) The fills consist primarily of brown fine to coarse-grained sands 2 Unless properly dealt with, the the moderately expansive characteristics of the tormational materials described previously can cause significant damage to the structure and associated improvements (such as those planned for the subject property),In order to reduce significantly the potential for such damage, one of the recommendations herein must be followed 2.1 If the planned structure and improvements are to be constructed using standard, nonexpansive-soils, design criteria, the site shall be prepared as follows 2.1.1 The moderately expansive soils shall be removed from all structural areas to a minimum distance of five feet outside perimeter footings The clay soils shall be removed to a minimum depth of 3 feet below the proposed, rough, finish-grade elevations Proposed Hanger/Office Structure Job No. 82-2206 29 July 1982 Page 6 I 2.1.2 Excavated areas shall be backfilled with non-expansive soils I obtained from an approved off-site borrow pit The non-expansive select materials must be placed and compacted to at least 90 percent of r Maximum Dry Density, in accordance with the requirements of the County of San Diego Grading Ordinance Upon satisfactory completion of the H backfilling Operation, continuous and spread footings may be designed, in accordance with the soil-bearing value assigned to the compacted nonexpansive fill materials The continuous and spread footings shall have a minimum width of 15 inches and extend a minimum depth of 18 I inches into the compacted fill soils for the proposed structures 1 2.1.3 Areas receiving improvements, such as patios, sidewalks, A C pavement (parking areas), et cetera, shall be underlain by at least four, inches of compacted fill materials such as that used in the backfilling operations for building locations I 2.2 If it is intended to construct the proposed structure and improvements I on the moderately expansive clay soils without preparation of the site (as described in Recommendation No 2.1), the following recommendations become applicable 2.2.1 The continuous foundations and spread footings shall I extend a minimum depth of 18 inches into the firm natural ground or compacted fill The continuous foundations shall be reinforced with two I No 4 steel bars, one bar shall be located near the top of the I foundations and one bar near the bottom 2.2.2 Concrete floor slabs, if used, shall be founded on at least four (4) inches of sand or decomposed granite, overlying visqueen The slabs shall be reinforced with 6 x 6 - 10/10 steel wire mesh or the structural equivalent Proposed Hanger/Office Structure Job No. 82-2206 29 July 1982 . Page 7 22.3 Prior to pouring footings and foundations, and prior to placement of floor slab base sections, the clayey soils shall be thoroughly watered such that they possess a moisture content of 2 percent above optimum moisture content (or more) at a depth of 12 inches below the { footing grade 2.2.4. It is recommended that all nonstructural concrete slabs (such as patios, driveways, sidewalks, et cetera), and all parking areas, be founded on at least four inches of nonexpansive soils 3 Utilizing an Angle of Internal Friction of at least 25 degrees, and a cohesion of 400 pounds per square foot (with the appropriate Terzaghi Equation), the maximum safe soil-bearing value (at a depth of 18 inches into the natural materials on this site) 1s at least 3,000 pounds per square foot This soil-bearing value may be utilized in the design of Continuous foundations and { spread footings when founded a minimum of 18 inches into the firm natural ground and/or compacted fill soils This soil-bearing value may be increased one third for design loads that include wind or seismic analysis If imported soils are required to bring the site to grade, the import soils shall be non-expansive and shall be obtained from an approved off-site borrow area A soil-bearing value for imported soils, should they be utilized on the site, Can- not be given until the materials source is known It is anticipated, however, that a value of at least 3,000 pounds per square foot will be obtained for tooting depths of 18 inches 4 Based on our laboratory test results and our experience with the soil types on the subject site, the soils will experience settlement in the magnitude of less than 0.5 inch under a structural load of 3,000 pounds per square toot .'- 5. The active earth pressure (to be utilized in the design of walls, et cetera), shall be based on an Equivalent Fluid Weight of 45 pounds per cubic toot (for level backfill only) irit dD Proposed Hanger/Office Structure Job No. 82-2206 29 July 1982 Page 8 6 The passive earth pressure of the encountered natural-ground soils (to be used for design ot building foundations and footings to resist the lateral forces) shall be based on an Equivalent Fluid Weight of 425 pounds per cubic foot { 7. A Coeffident of Friction of 0.35 times the dead load may be used between, the bearing soils and concrete wall foundations or structure foundations and floor slabs If the coefficient of friction As. to be used in conjunction with passive earth pressures, the coefficient shall be -reduced-to 0 3 8 The floor slab for the proposed hanger shall be designed by the Project Engineer for ancipated airplane and vehicular loads 9 The soils that occur within five feet of the face of the slopes will possess poor lateral stability, even though they are firm Proposed structures and other improvements (such as walls fences, patios, sidewalks, driveways, asphalt paving, et cetera), that are located within five feet of the face of slopes, could suffer differential movement as a result of the poor lateral stability of these soils Foundations and footings of proposed structures, walls, et cetera, when found- ed five feet and further away from the top slopes, may be of standard design in conformance wit the recommended soil-bearing value If the proposed foundations and footings are located closer than five feet inside the top of slopes, they shall be deepened to one foot below a line beginning at a point five feet horizontally inside the slopes and projected, outward and downward, f parallel to the face of the slope (see Figure No IV) { 10 Following placement of concrete floor slabs, sufficient drying time must be allowed prior to placement of floor coverings Premature placement of floor coverings may result in degradation of adhesive materials and loosening of the finish floor materials L Proposed Hanger/Office Structure Job No. 82-2206 29 July 1982 Page 9 11 It is recommended that all compacted fill slopes and natural cut slopes be planted with an erosion-resistant plant, in conformance with the requirements of the County of San Diego { 12 Planter areas and planter boxes shall be sloped to drain away from the founda- tions, footings and floor slabs Planter boxes shall be constructed with a sub- surface drain, installed in gravel, with the direction of subsurface and surface flow away from the foundations, footings and floor slabs, to an adequate drain- age facility. 13 The existing vegetation observed on the site must be removed prior to the preparation of building pads and/or areas to receive structural improvements 14 The existing fill soils, which will not be removed during the future grading opera- tion, shall be scarified (in place) to .a depth of 12 inches, watered to optimum [ requirements, and shall then be compacted to at least 90 percent of Maximum t Dry Density. 15 Any septic tanks, subsurface disposal systems, wells, et cetera, which might be discovered on the site, shall be removed and properly backfilled with approved on-site or imported fill soils, and shall then be compacted to at least 90 percent of Maximum Dry Density 16 Any backfill soils placed in utility trenches, or behind retaining walls, which support structures and other improvements (such as patios, sidewalks, drive'- ways, pavements, et cetera), other than landscaping shall be compacted to at least 90 percent of Maximum Dry Density. 17 It is our opinion that natural-ground cut slopes and compacted fill slopes of maximum Inclinations of 1.5 horizontal to 1.0 vertical shall be stable and free from deep-seated failures for slopes not exceeding 15 feet in height Proposed Hanger/Office Structure 29 July 1962 18 Adequate measures shall be taken to properly finish-grade the site after the [ structures and other improvements are in place Drainage waters from this site and adjacent properties are to be directed away from foundations, tops of slopes, floor slabs and footings, onto the natural drainage direction for this area or into properly designed and approved drainage facilities.'...Proper subsurface and surface drainage will help prevent waters from seeking the level L of the bearing soils under the foundations, footings and floor slabs Failure to observe this recommendation could result in uplift or undermining and [ differential settlement of the structure or other improvements on the site Geotechnkal Exploration, Inc. will assume no liability for damage to structures which is attributable to poor drainage 19 No subsurface structures shall be placed in the moderately expansive soils without being properly designed by a structural engineer and/or soils engineer. .20.'.Since our firm will not be supervising the-,future grading..operations, it is necessary that our firm perform an inspection of the site upon completion of the grading From the inspection we can determine if al V recommendations stated in this report are still applicable GRADING NOTES - Required grading operations shall be performed in accordance with the general require- ments of the County of San Diego Grading Ordinance, under the supervision of a qualified soils engineer or supervised field soils technician It is the responsibility of the Owner and/or Developer to ensure that the recommenda- tions summarized in this report are carried Out in the field operations r LIMITATIONS Our conclusions and recommendations have been based on all available data obtained from our field investigation and laboratory analysis, as well as our experience with the soils and formational materials located in this portion of Carlsbad Of necessity, we Proposed Hanger/Office Structure Job No. 82-2206 29 July 1982 Page 11 must assume a certain degree of continuity between exploratory excavations,..and/or natural exposures. It is, therefore, necessary that all observations, conclusions and recommendations be. venfied at the time grading operations begin, or when footing... •'. excavations are placed. In the event discrepancies are noted, we should be notified' immediately so that''an inspection can be made and additional recommendations issued, if required. This report should be considered va!!dfora period of three (3) years., and is subject to review by our firm following that time. If significant modifications ace made• to• building and/or and/or grading plans, especially with respect to the height and location of Cut and fill slopes and the height and location of proposed structures, this report must be presented to us for immediate review and possible revision. The firm of Geotechnical Exploration, Inc. shall not be held responsible for changes to the physical condition of the property, such as addition of fill soils or changing drainage patterns, which occur subsequent to issuance of this report Once again, should any questions arise concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact us Reference to our Job No. 82-2206 will expedite response to your inquiries Respectfully submitted, GEOTECI-t4ICAL EXPLORATION, INC. Jerry B Redoift, Project Coordinator. ' 'Ell iffor*'La Monte, R C.E 25241 JBR/CWL/pj Enclosures • " \ .• •— - ' - •-. 7- \ \L 14011 '. \ 7 0• , N"y'/ REFERENCE: Undated Site '•. °• Plan provided by Lusardi ,•,' .• Construction and Engineering V pjnrr. yh1 nie i_- . .... -- ll ......—.....-,',' r•011 •WJI (U U U5U JOE I9dI purposes. Locations and dimensions are approxi- mate. Actual property dimensions and locations of utilities may be obtained from the Appro'ed • Building Plans or the As-Builr Grading Plans. LEGEND • S • • • Proposed Sewer Line Structure ____________I, • • • • 0 •, • Property .a- •• Cut Slopes %( • Corners I Test Trench. Location i :a i n / : Job No. 82-2206 Fig No.. I Log -of Test Trenches V. 777:7 T'77 , . • • . • 1 V o o '- . '" . . . . . :. Depth In Feet. Graphic Log E Cr Ct ,/• lb '(D . . . .. V 0 'V .00 --3 c2 H.: V (' 'U) . . H (i) (D Tj ... 0 . (D1 • 0 . . U) 'Z V X ''-.•--''.'P ,•) . . . .- CD. "C) . c- '(D . . . . . . . . - .' . -. .. . . . . . 0 . . . . .< D '.- - . 0 '. '. U) • . . . . . .• . 0 V -. -•I,.. . . . . c . . r • • tT1' ••rt lal Ef M . rs : V . .. V. 0. 93 'xl • . i .. .-6 . . .-. t-. c.. . -3 COrt . . 00 ." . 0 U) -=m 0 .• . (iIi • - ,) .. ;. -- V _V.0. CA C).... Vs C__i < .P . . CD . . . '-V .< 0 ' .. . CD . . .... . -I - . .. U) Ul V. .... . .,. • . .Vrt . . ..• .0 rt . V CD .'•'' -'V ... V . ... .. CA __ 40 V' , V' •., . V V -• V , . V '', . '-I '' . .. Maximum Gr i Ul Dry Density . • _.__.._:'' . .....................- . .. 0 0 . Moisture V : . . (% Dry Weight) I. -4 t'J 'S Relative - tlj Compaction I 0/0 - .o . V'V V....-. . . ... ,. -- Expansion (+)or Consolidation (-) V , ,' • - - . V " .. . . 'V . ' ' V , , Pu.- .. 'V - '-V V: 'VV V•"_ V - V . .., ,. DIRECT SHEAR TEST. DATA I 2 3 APPARENT COHESION p.f) 400 APPARENT FRICTION ANGLE- 25 I 1.30 P•— 1.1. I 90 I 140 FILL SUITABILITY TESTS S IL TYPE SOIL cLAssIFIcATIoN : 'WRING 'TRENCH NO. ' DEPTH Light gray-brown, sandy',, 1 2' 2 . . 'clayey, silt 3 . ...; . .4'.. SWELL TEST DATA I 2 3 INITIAL DRY DENSITY (pci) INITIAL .WATER CONTENT (%) . . LOAD (psi) . 144, . PERCENTSWE1L., -.6.0 . JOB NO 82-2206 - - FIGURE NOIII Proposed Structure-..-. Concrete Floor. Slab '.. 5' 0" Top of Slope / 04 _____ •. •: . . H .0 ". - •0 jw' . S .Slope;': ,.. .(MaximwnIncliriâtjcn1.'5:1.0) 7.. 5. •.41 . - . .. }:einforcement. of,T ,. .-. . .-. .. Foundations and .Floor .. . .5 Slabs following the Rec- •., I Total De h of Footing omendationsof the Architect or- Structural .gineer...... . . .. - -- - ._- '- -- --- -. ----• - ..—Conàrete Foundation 1p L -. 'Sl2" Minimum - . 5 -- - - - - - - - - 5' 011. - TyPICAL:.. SCTION S (Showing Proposed Foundation Located Within Five Feet of Top of Slope) 1 .0 :- - Slope . . 1' - S - S. 5 Job NO.82-2206 Figure No. Iv: ,. 5- UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART SOIL DESCRIPTION COARSE-GRAINED. . C : S • .:. . . . . S More than half of material is larger than a No 200 sIeve GRAVELS CLEAN GRAVELS More than half of coarse fraction .is largerthan GW Well-graded gravels, gravel and sand mix-: No 4 sieve size but smaller than 3 tures little or no fines GP Poorly graded gravels, gravel and sand mix- tures little or no fines GRAVELS WITH FINES , S GM Silty gravels, poorly graded gravel-sand-silt S (appreciable amount) S S mixtures. 5 • S S GC Clay gravels, poorly graded gravel-sand-silt 5 S mixtures. S V S SANDS, CLEAN SANDS S SW Well-graded sand; gravelly sands, little or no More than half of coarse fraction is smaller than a no fines. No 4 sieve S . SP Poorly graded sands, gravelly sands, little or. 5 V S -. fines. S V SANDS WITH FINES SM Silty sands poorly graded sand and silty (appreciable amount) mixtures S S S sc Clayey sands, poorly graded sand and clay S 5 5 V mixtures. S SV APPENDIX A FINE-GRAINED More than half of material Is smaller than a No. 200 sieve SILTS AND CLAYS • • • S ML Inorganic silts and very fine sands, rock flour.. • • S V sandy silt and clayey-silt sand mixtures with a slight plasticity. Liquid Limit Less Than.50 • . • CL Inorganic clays of low to medium plasticity, S V • : . 5 . • • gravelly clays, sands' clays, silty clays, clean • clays OL Organic silts and organic silty clays of low plasticity MH Inorganic silts micaceous or diatomaceous fine sandy or silty soils elastic silts Liquid Limit Greater Than 50 CH Inorganic clays of high plasticity fat clays OH Organic clays of medium to high plasticity HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS S . PT Peat and other highly organic soils. • •S • • VS.. APPENDIX B GRADING SPECIFICATIONS General The intent of this item is to properly establish procedures for cleaning and compacting natural ground pre- paring areas to be filled and placing and compacting fill material to the grades and slopes as shown on the Grading Plans. S. Clearing All vegetation, brush and debris shall be removed, piled and burned, or otherwise disposed of,.to give the sur- face a neat and finished appearance. Compacting Natural Ground •.. 5 5 ..• S ... . .: r After clearing,* the natural ground shall be scarified to a depth of at least 12 inches.watered to optimum I requirements and compacted to not lest.. than 90 percent of maximum dry density, according to A.S.T.M. Test Method D-1557. in:a four-inch diameter. cylindrical. mold of 1/30th-cubic-foot volume. Field density tests shall be taken in the natural ground in accordance with A.S.T.M. Test Method 0-1556. 5 f. Fill Materials S 5 5 5 5 Materials for the fill shall be approved by the soils engineer and shall be free from organic matter and other deleterious substances In the event that expansive materials are encountered within three feet of finished grade they shall either be entirely removed or thoroughly mixed with good granular material before incorpo- rating.them in fills. No footing shall be allowed to bear on soils which, in the opinion of the soils engineer, are .. detrimentally expansive—unless designed for this clayey condition.. •. . S [ Placing. and Compacting FiH..Material After preparing the areas to be filled the fill materials shall be placed in layers not to exceed six inches in compacted thickness Each layer shall be watered to optimum requirements and compacted to not less than 90 percent of maximum dry density in accordance withA.S.T.M. Test Method D-1557. Compactionof the fill shall . then proceed in the specified manner to the grades as shown on the approved plans When the slope ratio of the original ground is steeper than five-horizontal-to-one-vertical the original r ground shall be benched Ground slopes flatter than five-horizontal-to-one-verticáishall be benched when considered necessary by the soils engineer. Fill slopes shall be compacted by means of a sheepsfoot roller or other suitable equipment. Slope compaction shall be continUed until the slopes are stable but not too dnse for planting Field density tests shall be taken when considered necessary by the soils engineer in accordance with A S I M Test Method 0-1556 and shall be made nWe xc6eding two feet in vertical height providing each layer is tested; : • :. •:;. S S .• . [ Supervision Continuous supervision of the fill shall be made by the representative of Geotechnical Exploration Inc during the grading operation so that he can certify that the fill was placed in accordance with these ( specifictions Season Limits No fill material shall be placed spread or rolled during unfavorable weather conditions When the work''is interrupted by heavy rains the filling operation shall not be resumed until field tests indicate that the moisture L content and density of the fill are as previously specified r :