The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2217 Cameo Rd; ; CBR2019-0373; PermitPERMIT REPORT Print Date: 03/24/2020 Job Address: Permit Type: Parcel No: Valuation: Occupancy Group: # Dwelling Units: Bedrooms: Bathrooms: Project Title: 2217 Cameo Rd BLDG-Residential 1670801100 $ 168,590.93 GRAHAM RESIDENCE Residential Permit Work Class: Addition Lot#: Project#: DEV2018-0218 Construction Type Orig. Plan Check#: Plan Check#: (city of Carlsbad Permit No: CBR2019-0373 Status: Closed -Finaled Applied: 02/15/2019 Issued: 06/28/2019 PermitFinal Close Out: 03/19/2020 Inspector: PYork Final Inspection: 03/19/2020 Description: GRAHAM: 711 SF ADD TO 1ST & 2ND FLOOR// 228 SF ADD TO GARAGE// 770 SF REMODEL Applicant: Owner: JOE BARBANO 2936 Camino Serbal Carlsbad, CA 92009-2900 760-809-4587 TRUST GRAHAM GARY AND TRACY TRUST 05-04-05 FEE BUILDING PERMIT FEE ($2000+) BUILDING PLAN CHECK FEE (BLDG) 2217 Cameo Rd CARLSBAD,CA 92008 ELECTRICAL BLDG RESIDENTIAL NEW/ADDITION/REMODEL GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS PLAN CHECK & INSPECTION MECHANICAL BLDG RESIDENTIAL NEW/ADDITION/REMODEL PLUMBING BLDG RESIDENTIAL NEW/ADDITION/REMODEL SB1473 GREEN BUILDING STATE STANDARDS FEE STRONG MOTION-RESIDENTIAL SWPPP INSPECTION FEE TIER 1-Medium BLDG SWPPP PLAN REVIEW FEE TIER 1-MEDIUM Total Fees: $ 2,328.53 Total Payments To Date : $ 2,328.53 Balance Due: AMOUNT $870.95 $609.66 $66.00 $175.00 $92.00 $182.00 $7.00 $21.92 $246.00 $58.00 $0.00 Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "Imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as "fees/exaction." You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees /exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project. NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitation has previously otherwise expired. Building Division 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad CA 92008-7314 I 760-602-2700 I 760-602-8560 f I www.carlsbadca.gov Page 1 of 1 'tBJ .20r 'g-o 2..\ i ,;, RESIDENTIAL (_ City of BUILDING PERMIT Plan CheckC8R201et-0?>73 Est. Value f(of> · 5'11 • Carlsbad APPL1cAT10N B-1 PC Deposit --------- Date 2-1'5-19 Job Address '2 '2. I I Gf>--f-\£D 12-D,-..P Suite: ____ APN: I 4' '7 -0 8 0 -11-6D CT/Project#:t:JCP 110--00Qlp Lot#: ____ Fire Sprinklers: yes@ AirCondltloning:@/no (S-t-+'2."'" FLOOP:. ADD1,f"'AJS. -ror=-,;1ST1,J& '2.-S-rt:>(l...'(' uoMe, BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF WORK: A PP 1H/JZ.P ~y 6ArtAb6 , 'E~ Hi4U... 1 S'E.Lo,./P FL<>o~ /l-<A!:76d.. ~..Jt-r€1 t~i/1-/2.e'MTJr;na. op 1."'P f'L>",L + f"Alt.'TIAL. '.f....,.. f,2 E:l.oJIFl6..a6' 2"'" t="LO•t<. t:>ec:i(, [!'J' Addition/New:+ I \ I Living SF, -11 Deck SF, -B-Patio SF,+ '2.1,8 Garage SF Is this to create ~~'j/5ory Dwelling Unit? Yest@ New Fireplace? Yes /@if yes how many? __ @" Remodel: j I §:: 1 SF of affected area Is the area a conversion or change of use? Yes I@ A PP <::iAs FAL.L D Pool/Spa: ____ SF Additional Gas or Electrical Features? App WofUAA<--¢e:S •~ GL.G'c.-*ICA,.t.-[~Jt.oc,I0,1l 1 6A 66'_, □ Solar: ___ KW, ___ Modules, Mounted: Roof/ Ground, Tilt: Yes/ No, RMA: Yes/ No, Battery: Yes/ No ~ Panel Upgrade: Yes/ No D Reroof: __________________________________ _ D Plumbing/Mechanical/Electrical Only: _______________________ _ D Other: -+ fo2 @. .1, ~ -f\am::J 't ( p2_,q @ 2nd f lrn:c APPLICANT (PRIMARY) Name: J oc;;. 13,l>.12.~ Address: ,Z.9'3(;, CAMI/.Jb ~M-- City: ~ e,A:P State: CA Zip: 9''2.oOCj Phone: [{,,O -80'.'J-45°8 7 Email: ioe. b ......... bOJ-1~ @ij!"'a..: I • co,i,, J DESIGN PROFESSIONAL Name: Jc,""-BA1Z.e.Ac-'0 Address: 1."'1"3<.. c.AMI.VO ~~ City: CA,(.2..LS.SAp State: CA Zip: 4'2..009 Phone: 74,D -So"\--4587 Email: Joe.. bo..rO<l.J'lo @g""c:1.:1 , C.Olvl Architect State License: ......,caa....;1_4Ls"'-'-o'-1:4------ CONTRACTOR BUSINESS Name: ? E.. (e,c.__').1-c~..,_::, k----c_s-/O-"\ Address: 'Z.8~'-\ L;,_ 1-A1rc,._~"'-Qr. 5_,:1.--.,_ 'E. City: V ; s b... State: CA Zip: q 2. 6 i \ Phone: 7 b o {, 'o 3--'ii"\ I"> Email: p~cc,c-.d·C..ol'\$kr~,c_\-.t'~,.,_ Py""'-c..;[. co,.__ State license: L040S:i l. Bus.License: blo5 60~'ii38-o7-Z• {Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he/she is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law {Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code} or that he/she Is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars {$500}). 1635 Faraday Ave Carlsbad, CA 92008 Ph: 760-602-2719 Fax: 760-602--8558 Email: Building@carlsbadca.gov B-1 Page 1 of 2 Rev. 06/18 ( OPTION A): WORKERS'COMPENSATION DECLARATION: I hearby affirm under penalty af perjury one of the following declarations: □ I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work which this permit is issued. □ I have and will maintain worker's compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My workers' compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Insurance Company Name: _____________________ _ Policy No. ______________ Expiration Date: _________ _ t:!f..certificate of Exemption: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to be come subject to the workers' compensation Laws of California. WARNING: Failure to secure workers compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and clvll fines up to $100,CKNl.00, In addition the to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for In Section 3706 of the Labor Code, Interest and attorney's fees. n ~ CONTRACTOR SIGNATURE: -~...::a...., .... ~~---='-==---------Ei-AGENT DATE: (o/2~ !rq ( OPTION B ): OWNER-BUILDER DECLARATION: I hereby affirm that I am exempt from Contractors License law for the following reason: □ I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). □ I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). □ I am exempt under Section ________ Business and Professions Code for this reason: 1. I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. □ Yes □ No 2. I (have/ have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. 3. I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name address/ phone/ contractors' license number): 4. I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name/ address/ phone/ contractors' license number): S. I will provide some of the work, but J have contracted {hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name/ address/ phone/ type of work): OWNER SIGNATURE: __________________ □AGENT DATE: _____ _ CONSTRUCTION LENDING AGENCY, IF ANY: I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work this permit is issued (Sec. 3097 (i) Civil Code). lender's Name: _____________________ Lender'sAd~ress: ____________________ _ ONLY COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING SECTION FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMITS ONLY: ls the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance A'ccount Act? 0 Yes □ No Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? □ Yes □ No Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? □ Yes □ No IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES ANO THE AIR POUUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. APPLICANT CERTIFICATION: I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representative of the City of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST All LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT.OSHA: An OSHA pennit is required for excavations over 5'0' deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the Building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such permit or if the building orwori< authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work Is commenced for a period of 180 days (Section 106.4.4 Unifo e~ 1635 Farada 8-1 Ph: 760-602-2719 Fax: 760-602-8558 Page 2of2 Email: Building@carlsbadca.gov Rev. 06/18 . -------~---·-· -•··---·----- Vt,,. ~ J J , ' , w ~ + h4 , _, ~~:-(itr~ ,,; , PERMIT INSPECTION HISTo~:! REPORT (CBR2019-0373) h ~,, : '. ·;~ Permit Type: BLDG-Residential Application Date: 02/15/2019 Owner: TRUST GRAHAM GARY AND TRACY TRUST 05-04-05 Work Class: Addition Issue Date: 06/28/2019 Subdivision: CHESTNUT HEIGHTS Status: Closed -Finaled Expiration Date: 04/13/2020 Address: 2217 Cameo Rd Carlsbad, CA 92008 IVR Number: 17124 Scheduled Actual Inspection Type Inspection No. Inspection Status Primary Inspector Reinspection Complete Date Start Date Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed BLDG-Building Deficiency No BLDG-14 No Frame-Steel-Bolting-Welding (Decks) BLDG-24 Rough-Topout No BLDG-34 Rough Electrical No BLDG-44 No Rough-Ducts-Dampers 10/15/2019 10/15/2019 BLDG-18 Exterior 107269-2019 Passed Paul York Complete Lath/Drywall Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed BLDG-Building Deficiency Yes 03/17/2020 03/17/2020 BLDG-Final 122322-2020 Failed Paul Burnette Reinspection Complete Inspection Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed BLDG-Building Deficiency No BLDG-Plumbing Final No BLDG-Mechanical Final No BLDG-Structural Final No BLDG-Electrical Final No 03/19/2020 03/19/2020 BLDG-Final 122656-2020 Passed Paul Burnette Complete Inspection Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed BLDG-Building Deficiency Yes BLDG-Plumbing Final Yes BLDG-Mechanical Final Yes BLDG-Structural Final Yes BLDG-Electrical Final Yes March 24, 2020 Page 2 of 2 ---------~-·------ Perm it Type: BLDG-Residential Application Date: 02/15/2019 Owner: TRUST GRAHAM GARY AND TRACY TRUST 05-04-05 Work Class: Addition Issue Date: 06/28/2019 Subdivision: CHESTNUT HEIGHTS Status: Closed -Finaled Expiration Date: 04/13/2020 Address: 2217 Cameo Rd Carlsbad, CA 92008 IVR Number: 17124 Scheduled Actual Inspection Type Inspection No. Inspection Status Primary Inspector Reinspection Complete Date Start Date 07/01/2019 07/01/2019 BLDG-11 096171-2019 Passed Paul York Complete Foundation/Ftg/Pier s (Rebar) Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed BLDG-Building Deficiency Yes BLDG-21 096419-2019 Passed Paul York Complete Underground/Underf loor Plumbing Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed BLDG-Bullding Deficiency Yes 07/10/2019 07/10/2019 BLDG-22 097059-2019 Passed Paul York Complete Sewer/Water Service Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed BLDG-Building Deficiency Yes 08/09/2019 08/09/2019 BLDG-27 Shower 100517-2019 Passed Paul York Complete Pan/Tubs Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed BLDG-Building Deficiency Yes 08/23/2019 08/23/2019 BLDG-13 Shear 101794-2019 Partial Pass Paul York Reinspection Incomplete Panels/HD (ok to wrap) Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed BLDG-Building Deficiency Yes BLDG-15 101793-2019 Passed Paul York Complete Roof/ReRoof (Patio) Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed BLDG-Building Deficiency Yes 09/06/2019 09/06/2019 BLDG-13 Shear 103337-2019 Passed Paul York Complete Panels/HD (ok to wrap) Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed BLDG-Building Deficiency Yes 09/24/2019 09/24/2019 BLDG-84 Rough 104593-2019 Partial Pass Paul York Reinspection Incomplete Combo(14,24,34,44) March 24, 2020 Page 1 of 2 ✓• EsG1I A SAFEbuilt Company DATE: 4/17/2019 D APPLICANT D JURIS. JURISDICTION: CARLSBAD PLAN CHECK#.: CBR2019-0373 PROJECT ADDRESS: 2217 CAMEO ROAD SET: III PROJECT NAME: SFD ADDITION + GARAGE/STORAGE FOR GRAHAM □ □ □ □ □ [g] □ □ The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's BUILDING codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at EsGil until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: JOE BARBANO EsGil staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. EsGil staff did advise the api:ilicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: ~ W . Telephone#: 760 809 4587 Date contacted: (b~mail: JOE.BARBANO@GMAIL.COM Mail Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS: By: Bert Domingo EsGil 4/9/2019 Enclosures: 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 ♦ San Diego, California 92123 ♦ (858) 560-1468 ♦ Fax (858) 560-1576 DATE: 4/1/2019 JURISDICTION: CARLSBAD ✓• EsG1I A SAFEbui!fCompany PLAN CHECK#.: CBR2019-0373 PROJECT ADDRESS: 2217 CAMEO ROAD SETII ~~LICANT ,)¥JURIS. PROJECT NAME: SFD ADDITION + GARAGE/STORAGE FOR GRAHAM D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's codes. D The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. IZJ The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at EsGil until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. IZJ The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: JOE BARBANO D EsGil staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. IZJ EsGil staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: JOE f\[) Telephone#: 760 809 4587 Date contacted: 1.,, ( (by:"'f' ) Email: JOE.BARBANO@GMAIL.COM f.... Mail)c Telephone )( Fax In Person 0 REMARKS: By: Bert Domingo EsGil 3/25/2019 Enclosures: 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 ♦ San Diego, California 92123 ♦ (858) 560-1468 ♦ Fax (858) 560-1576 \ CARLSBAD CBR2019-0373 4/1/2019 NOTE: The items listed below are from the previous correction list. These remaining items have not been adequately addressed. The numbers of the items are from the previous check list and may not necessarily be in sequence. The notes in bold font are current. PLANS 1. Please make all corrections, as requested in the correction list. Submit FOUR new complete sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (THREE sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring JI/YS)_ corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil is complete. 2. All sheets of plans must be signed by the person responsible for their preparation. (California Business and Professions Code). This will be checked on the final. 3. Plans deviating from conventional wood frame construction shall have the structural portions signed and sealed by the California state licensed engineer or architect responsible for their preparation, along with structural calculations. (California Business and Professions Code). This will be checked on the final. 4. EXITS, STAIRWAYS, AND RAILINGS Guards (Section R312): Shall be detailed to show capability to resist a concentrated load of 200 pounds in any direction along the top rail. Table R301.5. May need structural calcs to verify stability especially when using glass guardrail. The guardrail detail 9/AS.2 as responded does not seem to show how the 200 # force at the top of the rail would be resisted. Please submit calculations. CARLSBAD CBR2019-0373 4/1/2019 To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: Yes □ No □ The jurisdiction has contracted with EsGil, located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Bert Domingo at EsGil. Thank you. DATE: 2/28/2019 JURISDICTION: CARLSBAD ✓• EsG1I PLAN CHECK#.: CBR2019-0373 PROJECT ADDRESS: 2217 CAMEO ROAD SET: I □ APPLICANT □ JURIS. PROJECT NAME: SFD ADDITION + GARAGE/STORAGE FOR GRAHAM D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's codes. D The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. IZI The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at EsGil until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. IZI The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: JOE BARBANO D EsGil staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. IZI EsGil staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: JOE Telephone#: 760 809 4587 Date contacted: (by: ) Email: JOE.BARBANO@GMAIL.COM Mail Telephone 0 REMARKS: By: Bert Domingo EsGil Fax In Person Enclosures: 2/19/2019 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 ♦ San Diego, California 92123 ♦ (858) 560-1468 ♦ Fax (858) 560-1576 ' CARLSBAD CBR2019-0373 2/28/2019 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES PLAN CHECK#.: CBR2019-0373 JURISDICTION: CARLSBAD PROJECT ADDRESS: 2217 CAMEO ROAD FLOOR AREA: REMARKS: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED: 2/28/2019 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): STORIES: HEIGHT: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 2/19/2019 PLAN REVIEWER: Bert Domingo This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the California version of the International Residential Code, International Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Present California law mandates that construction comply with the 2016 edition of the California Code of Regulations (Title 24), which adopts the following model codes: 2015 IRC, 2015 IBC, 2015 UPC, 2015 UMC and 2014 NEC. The above regulations apply, regardless of the code editions adopted by ordinance. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 105.4 of the 2015 International Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. CARLSBAD CBR2019-0373 2/28/2019 [DO NOT PAY -THIS IS NOT AN INVOICE] VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: CARLSBAD PREPARED BY: Bert Domingo PLAN CHECK#.: CBR2019-0373 DATE: 2/28/2019 BUILDING ADDRESS: 2217 CAMEO ROAD BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R 3/U BUILDING AREA Valuation PORTION ( Sq. Ft.) Multiplier CTY ESTIMATE Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE Jurisdiction Code CB By Ordinance -- 1997 UBC Buildin Permit Fee .... g _J 1997 UBC Plan Check Fee ~ Reg. VALUE ($) Mod. 168,591 168,591 Type of Review: 0 Complete Review D Structural Only D Repetitive fee 3 Repeats D Other D Hourly EsGil Fee 1------flHr. @ • Comments: In addition to the above fee, an additional fee of$ $ /hr.) for the CalGreen review. $531.321 is due ( hour@ Sheet 1 of 1 CARLSBAD CBR2019-0373 2/28/2019 PLANS 1. Please make all corrections, as requested in the correction list. Submit FOUR new complete sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (THREE sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring TWO corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil is complete. 2. All sheets of plans must be signed by the person responsible for their preparation. (California Business and Professions Code). 3. Plans deviating from conventional wood frame construction shall have the structural portions signed and sealed by the California state licensed engineer or architect responsible for their preparation, along with structural calculations. (California Business and Professions Code). EXITS, STAIRWAYS, AND RAILINGS 4. Guards (Section R312): a) Shall be detailed to show capability to resist a concentrated load of 200 pounds in any direction along the top rail. Table R301.5. May need structural calcs to verify stability especially when using glass guardrail. ROOFS/DECKS/BALCONIES 5. Wood balconies and decks that support moisture-permeable floors shall be provided with an impervious moisture barrier system under the moisture- permeable floor, with positive drainage. CBC Section 2304.12.2.5, as amended by emergency building standards. 6. Specify on the plans the following information for the deck/balcony surfacing materials, per Section R106.1.1: a) Manufacturer's name and product name/number. b) ICC approval number, or equal. CARLSBAD CBR2019-0373 2/28/2019 FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS 7. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soils report are properly • incorporated into the construction documents. STRUCTURAL 8. The plans shall indicate that special inspection will be provided for the following work. (CBC Chapter 17 and Section 107.2) a) Expansion anchors. Periodic special inspection should be provided for anchors installed in hardened concrete. Section 1705.3. PLUMBING 9. Specify on the plans whether the existing house was built before or after 1994. For additions or improvements to a residence built before 1994, note on the plans that existing "noncompliant" fixtures (toilets that use more than 1.6 gallons of water per flush, urinals that use more than one gallon of water per flush, showerheads that have a flow capacity of more than 2.5 gallons of water per minute, and interior faucets that emit more than 2.2 gallons of water per minute) shall be replaced. Certification of compliance shall be given to the building inspector prior to final permit approval. California SB407. RESIDENTIAL GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS The California Building Standards Commission has adopted the Green Building Standards Code and must be enforced by the local building official. The following mandatory requirements for residential construction must be included on your plans. CGC Section 101.3. The Standards apply to newly constructed residential buildings, along with additions/alterations that increase the building's conditioned area, volume or size. CGC Section 301.1.1. Provide a sheet on the plans labeled "Green Building Code Requirements" and include the following notes as applicable. 10. Recycling. Note on the plans that a minimum of 65% of construction waste is to be recycled. CGC Section 4.408.1. ENERGY CONSERVATION 11. Include on the Title Sheet of the plans the following statement: "Compliance with the documentation requirements of the 2016 Energy Efficiency Standards is necessary for this project. Registered, signed, and dated copies of the appropriate CF1 R, CF2R, and CF3R forms shall be made available at necessary intervals for Building Inspector review. Final completed forms will be available for the building owner." CARLSBAD CBR2019-0373 2/28/2019 Residential ventilation requirements: ES 150.0(o)/ASHRAE 62.2 12. Kitchens require exhaust fans with a minimum 100 cfm ducted to the exterior. Detail compliance by including a complying exhaust fan or a ducted range hood to the exterior. 13. Bathrooms require exhaust fans (minimum 50 cfm) to be ducted to the exterior. A bathroom is defined "as a room with a bathtub, shower, or spa or some similar source of moisture". MISCELLANEOUS 14. Please cross reference details applicable to the framing plans. 15. Please show how the new top plates would be connected to the existing top plates 16. Please submit calculations for the foundation of the short shear walls(SW & 3' 4") To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. • Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: Yes □ No □ The jurisdiction has contracted with EsGil, located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Bert Domingo at EsGil. Thank you. EAST COUNTY SOIL CONSULTATIONRECEIVED Gary Graham AND ENGINEERING, INC. 10925 HARTLEY ROAD, SUITE "I" SANTEE, CALIFORNIA 92071 (619) 258-7901 Fax 258-7902 2217 Cameo Road Carlsbad, California 92008 Subject: Foundation Plan and Details Review Proposed Residential Additions 2217 Cameo Road City of Carlsbad, California 92008 MAR 2 0 2019 CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DIVISION March 18. 2019 Project No. 18-1106H5(2) Reference: .. Limited Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Residential Additions. 2217 Cameo Road, Carlsbad, California 92008", Project No. 18-1106H5(2), Prepared by East County Soil Consultation and Engineering, Inc., Dated September 17. 2018. Dear Mr. Graham: In accordance with your request, we have reviewed the foundation plan and details prepared by La Costa Engineering of Carlsbad, California for the proposed residential additions at the subject site. The foundation plan and details were found to be in accordance with the recommendations provided in the referenced geotechnical report. Our firm should observe the foundation excavations for proper size and embedment into competent bearing soils. If we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Mamadou Sahou iallo, P.E. RCE 54071. GE 2704 MSD/md January 28, 2019 Gary Graham 30691 Steeplechase Drive San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 Ccityof Carlsbad SUBJECT: 2nd REVIEW FOR NCP 18-0006 (DEV2018-0218) -GRAHAM RESIDENCE Dear Mr. Graham, The items requested from you earlier to make your Nonconforming Construction Permit, application no. NCP 18-0006 complete have been received and reviewed by the Planning Division. It has been determined that the application is now complete for processing. Although the initial processing of your application may have already begun, the technical acceptance date is acknowledged by the date of this communication. Please note that although the application is now considered complete, there may be issues that could be discovered during project review and/or environmental review. Any issues should be resolved prior to scheduling the project for public hearing. In addition, the city may request, in the course of processing the application, that you clarify, amplify, correct, or otherwise supplement the basic information required for the application. In order to expedite the processing of your application, please contact me at (760) 602-4614 to discuss or to schedule a meeting to discuss your application and to completely understand this letter. You may also contact each commenting department individually as follows: • Land Development Engineering Division: Jennifer Horodyski, Associate Engineer, at 760-602-2747 Sincerely, ~-- / ~- PAULDAN Associate Planner PD:dh c: Jennifer Horodyski, Project Engineer File Copy Data Entry Community & Economic Development Planning Division / 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 / 760-602-4600 / 760-602-8560 f I www.carlsbadca.gov -~ Gary Graham 2217 Cameo Road Carlsbad, California 92008 EAST COUNTY SOIL CONSULTATION AND ENGINEERING, INC. 10925 HARTLEY ROAD, SUITE "I" SANTEE, CALIFORNIA 92071 (619) 258-7901 Fax 258-7902 September 17, 2018 Project No. 18-1106H5(2) Subject: Limited Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Residential Additions 2217 Cameo Road City of Carlsbad, California 92008 Dear Mr. Graham: In accordance with your request, we have performed a limited geotechnical investigation at the subject site to discuss the geotechnical aspects of the project and provide recommendations for the proposed residential improvement. Oµr investigation has found that the areas of the proposed additions are underlain by moderately dense fill soils to a depth of approximately 3 feet below existing grade. Dense terrace deposits were underlying these soils to the explored depth of 6 feet. It is our opinion that the construction of the proposed additions is geotechnically feasible provided the recommendations herein are implemented in the design and construction. Should you have any questions with regard to the contents of this report, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Respectfully submitted, CBR2019--0373 2217 CAMEO RD GRAHAM 711 SF ADD TO 1ST & 2ND FLOOR /1228 SF ADD TO GARAGE ii 1.154 SF REMODEL ~---(.) DEV2018-0218 1670801100 2/15/2019 CBR2019-0373 • Ga1y Graham/ 2217 Cameo Road I Carlsbad Project No. 18-1106H5(2) TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. .3 SCOPE OF SERVICES ...................................................................................................................................... 3 SITE DESCRIPTION AND PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ........................................................................ 3 FIELD INVESTIGATION AND LABORATORY TESTING ........................................................................ 4 GEOLOGY ......................................................................................................................................................... 4 Geologic Setting .................................................................................................................................... 4 Site Stratigraphy .................................................................................................................................... 4 SEISMICITY ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 Regional Seismicity ............................................................................................................................... 5 Seismic Analysis ................................................................................................................................... 5 2016 CBC Seismic Design Criteria ...................................................................................................... 5 Geologic Hazard Assessment. ............................................................................................................... 6 GEOTECHNlCAL EVALUATION .................................................................................................................. 7 Compressible Soils ................................................................................................................................ 7 Expansive Soils ...................................................................................................................................... 7 Groundwater .......................................................................................................................................... 7 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................ 7 CLEARING AND GRUBBING ......................................................................................................................... 8 FOUNDATIONS AND SLABS ........................................................................................................................ 8 SETTLEMENT ................................................................................................................................................... 9 PRESATURATION OF SLAB SUBGRADE ................................................................................................... 9 TEMPORARY SLOPES .................................................................................................................................... 9 TRENCH BACKFILL ........................................................................................................................................ 9 DRAJNAGE ........................................................................................................................................................ 9 FOUNDATION PLAN REVIEW .................................................................................................................... 10 LIMITATIONS OF INVESTIGATION ......................................................................................................... 10 ADDITIONAL SERVICES ............................................................................................................................ 11 PLATES Plate 1-Location ofExplorat01y Boreholes Plate 2-Summary Sheet (Exploratory Borehole Logs) ...................................................................... 12 Plate 3 -uses Soil Classification Chart PAGE L-1, LABORATORY TESTRESULTS .............................................................................................. 13 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................................. 14 2 Ga,y Graham/ 2217 Cameo Road I Carlsbad Project No. 18-1 /06H5(2) INTRODUCTION This is to present the findings and conclusions of a limited geotechnical investigation for a proposed two-story and second story additions to the existing single-family residence located at 2217 Cameo Road, in the City of Carlsbad, California. The objectives of the investigation were to evaluate the existing soils conditions and provide recommendations for the proposed improvement. SCOPE OF SERVICES The following services were provided during this investigation: 0 Site reconnaissance and review of published geologic, seismological and geotechnical reports and maps pertinent to the project area 0 Subsurface exploration consisting of two (2) boreholes within the limits of the proposed areas of improvement. The boreholes were logged by our Staff Geologist. 0 Collection ofrepresentative soil samples at selected depths. The obtained samples were sealed in moisture-resistant containers and transported to the laboratory for subsequent analysis. 0 Laboratory testing of samples representative of the types of soils encountered during the field investigation 0 Geologic and engineering analysis of the field and laboratory data, which provided the basis for our conclusions and recommendations 0 Production of this report, which summarizes the results of the above analysis and presents our findings and recommendations for the proposed improvement SITE DESCRIPTION AND PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION The subject site is a nearly rectangular-shaped residential lot located on the south side of Cameo Road, in City of Carlsbad, California. The property which encompasses an area of approximately 10,620 square feet is occupied by a two-story, single-family residence. The building pad is relatively level with moderate slopes descending to the northwest. Vegetation consisted of grass, shrub and a few trees. The parcel is bordered by Cameo Road to the north and similar residential developments to the remaining directions. The preliminary plans prepared by Joe Barbano, Architect of Carlsbad, California indicate that the proposed improvement will include a two-story and second story additions to the existing house. The additions will be wood-framed and founded on continuous and/ or spread footings with slab- on-grade floors. 3 .. Gary Graham/ 2217 Cameo Road /Carlsbad Project No. 18-1106H5(2) FIELD INVESTIGATION AND LABORATORY TESTING On August 16, 2018, two (2) boreholes were excavated to a maximum depth of approximately 6 feet below existing grade with a hand auger. The approximate locations of the boreholes are shown on the attached Plate No. 1, entitled "Location of Exploratory Boreholes". A continuous log of the soils encountered was recorded at the time of excavation and is shown on Plate No. 2 entitled "Summary Sheet". The soils were visually and texturally classified according to the flied identification procedures set forth on Plate No. 3 entitled "USCS Soil Classification". Following the field exploration, laboratory testing was performed to evaluate the pertinent engineering properties of the foundation materials. The laboratory-testing program included moisture and density, maximum dry density and optimum moisture content, particle size analysis and expansion index tests. These tests were perfom1ed in general accordance with ASTM standards and other accepted methods. Page L-1 and Plate No. 2 provide a summary of the laboratory test results. GEOLOGY Geologic Setting The subject site is located within the southern portion of what is known as the Peninsular Ranges Geomorphic Province of California. The geologic map pertaining to the area (Reference No. 5) indicates that the site is underlain by Pleistocene terrace deposits (Qti). Site Stratigraphy The subsurface descriptions provided are interpreted from conditions exposed during the field investigation and/or inferred from the geologic literature. Detailed descriptions of the subsurface materials encountered during the field investigation are presented on the exploration logs provided on Plate No. 2. The following paragraphs provide general descriptions of the encountered soil types. Fill (Of) Fill soils were encountered in the boreholes to a depth of approximately 3 feet below existing grade. These soils generally consisted of reddish brown, silty sand that was moist and medium dense in consistency. Ten-ace Deposits (Oti} Terrace deposits were underlying the fill soils to the explored depth of 6 feet. They consisted of reddish brown, sand with silt that was moist and dense in consistency. 4 Gmy Graham/ 2217 Cameo Road /Carlsbad Project No. 18-1 /06H5(2) SEISMICITY Regional Seismicity Generally, Seismicity within California can be attributed to the regional tectonic movement taking place along the San Andreas Fault Zone, which includes the San Andreas Fault and most parallel and subparallel faults within the state. The portion of southern California where the subject site is located is considered seismically active. Seismic hazards are attributed to groundshaking from earthquake events along nearby or more distant Quaternary faults. The primary factors in evaluating the effect an earthquake has on a site are the magnitude of the event, the distance from the epicenter to the site and the near surface soil profile. According to the Fault-Rupture Hazard Zones Act of 1994 (revised Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zones Act), quaternary faults have been classified as "active" faults, which show apparent surface rupture during the last 11,000 years (i.e., Holocene time). "Potentially-active" faults are those faults with evidence of displacing Quaternary sediments between 11,000 and 1.6 million years old. Seismic Analysis Based on our evaluation, the closest known "active" fault is the Newport-Inglewood Fault located approximately 6.13 miles (9.8 kilometers) to the west. The Newport-Inglewood Fault is the design fault of the project due to the predicted credible fault magnitude and ground acceleration. The Seismicity of the site was evaluated utilizing the 2008 National Hazard Maps from the USGS website and Seed and Idriss methods for active Quaternary faults within a SO-mile radius of the subject site. The site may be subjected to a Maximum Probable Earthquake of 7.5 Magnitude along the Newport-Inglewood Fault, with a corresponding Peak Ground Acceleration of 0.43g. The maximum Probable Earthquake is defined as the maximum earthquake that is considered likely to occur within a I 00-year time period. The effective ground acceleration at the site is associated with the part of significant ground motion, which contains repetitive strong-energy shaking, and which may produce structural deformation. As such, the effective or "free field" ground acceleration is referred to as the Repeatable High Ground Acceleration (RHGA). It has been determined by Ploessel and Slosson (1974) that the RHGA is approximately equal to 65 percent of the Peak Ground Acceleration for earthquakes occurring within 20 miles of a site. Based on the above, the calculated Credible RHGA at the site is 0.28g. 2016 CBC Seismic Design Criteria A review of the active fault maps pertaining to the site indicates the location of the Newport- Inglewood Fault Zone approximately 9.8 km to the west. Ground shaking from this fault or one of the major active faults in the region is the most likely happening to affect the site. With respect to this hazard, the site is comparable to others in the general area. The proposed residential additions should be designed in accordance with seismic design requirements of the 2016 California Building 5 Gmy Graham/ 2217 Cameo Road I Carlsbad Project No. 18-1106H5(2) Code or the Structural Engineers Association of California using the following seismic design parameters: PARAMETER Site Class Mapped Spectral Acceleration For Short Periods, s, Mapped Spectral Acceleration For a I -Second Period, S1 Site Coefficient, F, Site Coefficient, Fv Adjusted Max. Considered Earthquake Spectral Resoonse Acceleration for Short Periods, SMs Adjusted Max. Considered Earthquake Spectral Response Acceleration for I -Second Period, SM1 5 Percent Damped Design Spectral Response Acceleration for Short Periods, Sos 5 Percent Damped Design Spectral Acceleration for I-Second Period, Srn Geologic Hazard Assessment Ground Rupture Response VALUE 20Ui Cl3C & ASCE 7 UFERENCES D Table 20.3-1/ ASCE 7, Chanter 20 1.110g Figure 1613 .3. I (I) 0.427g Figure 1613.3.1(2) 1.056 Table 1613.3.3(1) 1.573 Table 1613.3.3(2) 1.172g Equation 16-37 0.672g Equation 16-38 0.782g Equation 16-39 0.448g Equation 16-40 Ground rupture due to active faulting is not considered likely due to the absence of known fault traces within the vicinity of the project; however, this possibility cannot be completely ruled out. The unlikely hazard of ground rupture should not preclude consideration of "flexible" design for on-site utility lines and connections. Liquefaction Liquefaction involves the substantial loss of shear strength in saturated soils, usually sandy soils with a loose consistency when subjected to earthquake shaking. Based on the absence of shallow groundwater and consistency of the underlying bedrock material, it is our opinion that the potential for liquefaction is very low. Landsliding There is no indication that landslides or unstable slope conditions exist on or adjacent to the project site. There are no obvious geologic hazards related to landsliding to the proposed improvement or adjacent properties. Tsunamis and Seiches The site is not subject to inundation by tsunamis due to its elevation. The site is also not subject to seiches (waves in confined bodies of water). 6 Ga,y Graham/ 2217 Cameo Road I Carlsbad Project No. 18-1106H5(2) GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION Based on our investigation and evaluation of the collected information, we conclude that the proposed residential improvement is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint provided the recommendations herein will be properly implemented during construction. Based on the consistency of the existing fill soils, it is our opinion that the proposed additions can be supported by these soils without any detrimental settlement. The new foundations may consist of reinforced continuous and/ or spread footings with a reinforced slab. Recommendations and criteria for foundation design are provided in the Foundations and Slabs recommendations section of this report. Compressible Soils Our field observations and testing indicate low compressibility within the moderately dense fill soils and dense terrace deposits, which underlie the site. Therefore, no remedial grading will be required. Following implementation of the recommendations presented herein, the potential for soil compression resulting from the new development has been estimated to be low. The low-settlement assessment assumes a well-planned and maintained site drainage system. Expansive Soils An expansion index test was performed on a representative sample of the fill soils to determine volumetric change characteristics with change in moisture content. An expansion index of O was obtained which indicates a very low expansion potential for the foundation soils. Groundwater Static groundwater was not encountered to the depths of the boreholes. The building pad is located at an elevation of approximately 310 feet above Mean Sea Level. We do not expect groundwater to affect the proposed construction. Reconnnendations to prevent or mitigate the effects of poor surface drainage are presented in the Drainage section of this report. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The following conclusions and recommendations are based upon the analysis of the data and information obtained from our soil investigation. This includes site reconnaissance; field investigation; laboratory testing and our general knowledge of the soils native to the site. The site is suitable for the proposed residential improvement provided the recommendations set forth are implemented during construction. 7 Gmy Graham/ 2217 Cameo Road /Carlsbad Project No. 18-1 !06H5(2) CLEARING AND GRUBBING The areas of the proposed two-story additions should be cleared of vegetation and deleterious materials. Vegetation and the debris from the clearing operation should be properly disposed of off-site. The areas should be thoroughly inspected for any possible buried objects, which need to be rerouted or removed prior to construction. All holes, trenches, or pockets left by the removal of these objects should be properly backfilled with compacted fill materials. Our field investigation indicates that moderately dense fill soils underlie the areas of the proposed additions. These soils will be adequate for support of the proposed additions. Therefore, no remedial grading will be required. Foundation excavations should be observed by a representative of this firm to verify competent bearing soils. FOUNDATIONS AND SLABS a. Continuous and spread footings are suitable for use and should extend to a minimum depth of 18 inches below the lowest adjacent grade into the moderately dense fill soils. Continuous footings should be at least 15 inches in width and reinforced with a minimum of four #4 steel bars; two bars placed near the top of the footings and the other two bars placed near the bottom of the footings. Isolated or spread footings should have a minimum width of24 inches. Their reinforcement should consist of a minimum of #4 bars spaced 12 inches on center (each way) and placed horizontally near the bottom. These recommendations are based on geotechnical considerations and are not intended to supersede the structural engineer requirements. New footings should be dowelled to existing footings in accordance with the structural engineer requirements. b. Interior concrete slabs should be a minimum 4 inches thick. Reinforcement should consist of#3 bars placed at 16 inches on center each way within the middle third of the slabs by supporting the steel on chairs or concrete blocks "dobies". The slabs should be underlain by 2 inches of clean sand over a I 0-mil visqueen moisture barrier. The effect of concrete shrinkage will result in cracks in virtually all-concrete slabs. To reduce the extent of shrinkage, the concrete should be placed at a maximum of 4-inch slump. The minimum steel recommended is not intended to prevent shrinkage cracks. c. Where moisture sensitive floor coverings are anticipated over the slabs, the 10-mil plastic moisture barrier should be underlain by a capillary break at least 2 inches thick, consisting of coarse sand, gravel or crushed rock not exceeding 3/4 inch in size with no more than 5 percent passing the #200 sieve. d. An allowable soil bearing value of 2,000 pounds per square foot may be used for the design of continuous and spread footings at least 12 inches wide and founded a minimum of 12 inches into the moderately dense fill soils. This value may be increased by 400 psf for each additional foot of depth or width to a maximum value of 4,000 lb/ft2. e. Lateral resistance to horizontal movement may be provided by the soil passive pressure and the friction of concrete to soil. An allowable passive pressure of 250 pounds per square foot per foot 8 Ga,y Graham/ 2217 Cameo Road I Carlsbad Project No. 18-1106H5(2) of depth may be used. A coefficient of friction of0.35 is recommended. The soils passive pressure as well as the bearing value may be increased by 1/3 for wind and seismic loading. SETTLEMENT Settlement of compacted fill soils is n01mal and should be anticipated. Because of the type and thickness of the fill soils anticipated under the proposed footings and the light building loads, total and differential settlement should be within acceptable limits. For design purposes, a differential settlement up to one-quaiier inch and a total settlement up to one-half inch across the structural span may be used. PRESATURATION OF SLAB SUBGRADE Due to the granular characteristics of the subgrade soils, presoaking of subgrade prior to concrete pour is not required. However, subgrade soils in areas receiving concrete should be watered prior to concrete placement to mitigate any drying shrinkage, which may occur following site preparation and foundation excavation. TEMPORARY SLOPES For the excavation of foundations and utility trenches, temporary vertical cuts to a maximum height of 4 feet may be constructed in fill or natural soil. Any temporary cuts beyond the above height constraints should be shored or further laid back following a 1 : 1 (horizontal to vertical) slope ratio. OSHA guidelines for trench excavation safety should be implemented during construction. TRENCH BACKFILL Excavations for utility lines, which extend under structural areas should be properly backfilled and compacted. Utilities should be bedded and backfilled with clean sand or approved granular soil to a depth of at least one foot over the pipe. This backfill should be uniformly watered and compacted to a firm condition for pipe support. The remainder of the backfill should be on-site soils or non-expansive imported soils, which should be placed in thin lifts, moisture-conditioned and compacted to at least 90% relative compaction. DRAINAGE Adequate measures should be undertaken after the additions and other improvements are in place, such that the drainage water within the site and adjacent properties is directed away from the foundations, footings, floor slabs and the tops of slopes via rain gutters, downspouts, surface swales and subsurface drains towards the natural drainage for this area. In accordance with the 2016 California Building Code, a minimum gradient of 2 percent is recommended in hardscape areas adjacent to the structure. In earth areas, a minimum gradient of 5 percent away from the structure for a distance of at least 10 feet should be provided. If this requirement cannot be met due to site limitations, drainage can be done through a swale in accordance with Section 1804.4 of the 2016 California Building Code. Earth swales should have a minimum gradient of 2 percent. Drainage should be directed to approved drainage facilities. Proper surface and subsurface drainage will be 9 Ga,y Graham/ 2217 Cameo Road I Carlsbad Project No. /8-1106H5(2) required to minimize the potential of water seeking the level of the bearing soils under the foundations, footings and floor slabs, which may otherwise result in undermining and differential settlement of the structure and other improvements. FOUNDATION PLAN REVIEW Our firm should review the foundation plans and details during the design phase to assure conformance with the intent of this report. During construction, foundation excavations should be observed by our representative prior to the placement of forms, reinforcement or concrete for conformance with the plans and specifications. LIMITATIONS OF INVESTIGATION Our investigation was performed using the skill and degree of care ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable soils engineers and geologists practicing in this or similar localities. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the conclusions and professional advice included in this report. This report is prepared for the sole use of our client and may not be assigned to others without the written consent of the client and ECSC&E, Inc. The samples collected and used for testing, and the observations made, are believed representative of site conditions; however, soil and geologic conditions can vary significantly between exploration trenches, boreholes and surface exposures. As in most major projects, conditions revealed by construction excavations may vary with preliminary findings. If this occurs, the changed conditions must be evaluated by a representative of ECSC&E and designs adjusted as required or alternate designs recommended. This report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the owner, or of his representative to ensure that the information and recommendations contained herein are brought to the attention of the project architect and engineer. Appropriate recommendations should be incorporated into the structural plans. The necessary steps should be taken to see that the contractor and subcontractors carry out such recommendations in the field. The findings of this report are valid as of this present date. However, changes in the conditions of a property can occur with the passage of time, whether they are due to natural processes or the works of man on this or adjacent properties. In addition, changes in applicable or appropriate standards may occur from legislation or the broadening of knowledge. Accordingly, the findings of this report may be invalidated wholly or partially by changes outside of our control. Therefore, this report is subject to review and should be updated after a period of two years. 10 . Ga,y Graham/ 2217 Cameo Road/Carlsbad Project No. 18-1106H5(2) ADDITIONAL SERVICES The review of plans and specifications, field observations and testing lmder our direction are integral parts of the recommendations made in this report. If East County Soil Consultation and Engineering, Inc. is not retained for these services, the client agrees to assume our responsibility for any potential claims that may arise during construction. Observation and testing are additional services, which are provided by our film, and should be budgeted within the cost of development. Plates No. I through 3, Page L-1 and References are parts of this report. 11 • . . . i I V J/ ~1-----;7*~·------• EAST COUNTY SOIL CONSULTATION & ENGINEERING, INC. 10925 HAR1LEY RD .. SUITE I. SANTEE. CA 92071 (619} 258-790 J Fax (619) 258-7902 0/,'--rf/ &~~ />~tJ,frr ~Z-/7 C,,.f/f1CD µ)/f6 c~4¥0 t:c't'/(/7 p~ 567/-/3 / ;M/8 ?,&J/ez:r fVt//!3-~/Jt'b/.-/'5<i f'/~ /Yt?. / DEPTH Surface 1.5' 3.0' 6.0' DEPTH Surface 1.5' 3.0' 4.0' Ga1y Graham/ 2217 Cameo Road I Carlsbad Project No. J8-ll06H5(2) PLATENO.2 SUMMARY SHEET BOREHOLE NO. 1 SOIL DESCRIPTJON FILL (Qf) reddish brown, moist, medium dense, silty sand '' '' " « '' « TERRACE DEPOSITS (Qti) reddish brown, moist, dense, sand with silt bottom of borehole, no caving, no groundwater borehole backfilled 8/J 6/18 BOREHOLE NO. 2 SOJL DESCRJPTION FILL (Qf) reddish brown, moist, medium dense, silty sand '' ,, " '' « '' TERRACE DEPOSITS (Qti) reddish brown, moist, dense, sand with silt bottom of borehole, no caving, no groundwater borehole backfilled 8/20/18 y 111.3 y I 14.7 Y = DRY DENSITY lN PCF M = MOISTURE CONTENT IN % 12 ---------- M 8.3 M 8.7 < .~ SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART COARSE GRAINED SOILS MORE THAN 50" OF MA TE RIAL IS LARGER THAN NO. 200S1MSIZE FINE GRAINED SOILS MORETH.l.N50% OF MATERIAi.iS SMAI.LER THAN NO. 2110S1MS!ZE MAJOR DIVISIONS GRAVEL ANO GRAVELLY SOILS SANO AND SANDY SOILS MORE THA."1 5011, OF COARSE FRACTION PASSING ONN0.4$1~ SILTS ANO CLAYS SILTS ANO CLAYS CLEAN GRAVELS (LITTLE OR NO FINES) SANDS WITH FINES (APPRECIABLE AMOUNT OF FINES) LIQUID LIMIT LESS THAN 50 LIQUID LIMIT GREATER THAN 50 HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS SYMBOLS GRAPH LETTER l!,!t ~ ~ 9 'ilt!!~S GW GP GM SM SC ML CL CL MH CH OH PT TYPICAL DESCRIPTIONS WeLL-GAAOEO GRAVELS, GRAVEL· SANO MIXTURES, LlmE OR NO FINES POORLY-OAAOEO GRAVELS, GRAVEL· SANO MIXTURES, Lime OR NO FINES SILTY GRAVELS, GRAVEL · SANO• SILT MIXTURES WELL·GAAOEO SANOS, GRAVELLY SANOS, LITTLE OR NO FINES POORLY-GRACED SANOS, GRAVELLY SA."-10, LlffiE OR NO FINES SILTY SANDS. SANO-SILT MIXTURES CLAVEY SANOS. SANO· CLAY MIXTURES INORGANIC SILTS ANO VERY FINE SANOS, ROCK FLOUR, SIL TY OR CLAYEY FINE SANOS OR CLAYEY SILTS WITH SLIGHT PL"-STICITV INORGANIC ClAVS OF LOW TO MEOll.:M PLASTICITY, GRAVELLY CLAYS, SANDY CLAYS, SILTY CLAYS, LEAN CLAYS ORGANIC SILTS A.'10 ORGANIC SILTY ClA VS OF LOW PLASTICITY INORGANIC SIL TS, MICACEOUS OR OIATOIJACEOUS FINE SANO OR Sil TY SOILS INORGANIC CLA VS OF HIGH PLASTICITY ORGANIC CLA VS OF ME□IUM TO HIGH PLASTICITY, ORGANIC SILTS PEAT. HUMUS. SWAMP SOILS WITH HIGH ORGANIC CONTENTS NOTE: OUAl SYMBOLS ARE USED TO INDICATE BOROERLiNE SOIL CLASSIFICATIONS CLASSIFICATION RANGE OF GRAIN SIZES U.S. STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN SIEVE SIZE MILLIMETERS BOULDERS Above 12 Inches Above305 COBBLES 12 Inches To 3 Inches 305 To 76.2 GRAVEL 3 Inches to No. 4 76.2 10 4.76 Coarse 3 Inches to ¼ Inch 76.210 19.1 Fine ¼ Inch to No. 4 19.1104.76 SAND No. 4 to No. 200 4 76 to0.074 Coarse No. 410 No. 10 4.76 to 2.00 Medium No. 10 to No. 40 2.00 10 0.420 Fine No. 40 10 No. 200 0.420 10 0.074 SILT AND CLAY Below No. 200 Bclow0.074 GRAIN SIZE CHART EAST COUNTY SOIL CONSULTATION & ENGINEERING, INC. 10925 HARTI.EY RD., SUITE I, SAm'EE, CA.92071 (619) 258-7901 Pax C619) 258-7902 -,a_ . ---,. 10 V 1/1 / V I CM :/ L I/ l/ 1/1~ V i I ,o / /, i NH&OH I u:,-"1tU'....-I wi.a~L i I I •-I I io 20 la ,o 50 ,c 10 ao to ico 1..tCUU> UMIT (U.}. t; PLASTICITY CHART &-+;<:y G.e4//Alv? rJftJfrt zz,./7 <!4/rJZ:P RO#IJ ~~?-s;g.M • Gary Graham/ 2217 Cameo Road I Carlsbad Project No. 18-1106H5(2) PAGE L-1 LABORATORY TEST RESULTS MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY AND OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT (ASTM D1557) The maximum dry densities and optimum moisture contents of the fill materials as determined by ASTM Dl557, Procedures A and B which use 25 blows ofa 10 pound slide hammer falling from a height of 18 inches on each of 5 equal layers in a 4 inch diameter 1 /30 cubic foot compaction cylinder and Procedure C which uses 56 blows of a 10 pound slide hammer falling from a height of 18 inches on each of 5 equal layers in a 6 inch diameter 1/13.3 cubic foot compaction cylinder are presented as follows: SOIL TYPE/ PROCEDURE DESCRIPTION 1/A REDDISH BROWN SILTY SAND MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY (PCF) 126.0 EXPANSION INDEX TEST (ASTM D4829) INJTIALDRY OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT /%) LOCATION 8.9 BH-1@ 1.5' INITIAL MOISTURE CONTENT{%) SATURATED MOISTURE CONTENT(%) DENSITY EXPANSION (PCF) INDEX LOCATION 8.3 16.7 120.0 BH-1@ 1.5' PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS (ASTM D422) U.S. Standard Percent Passing Percent Passing Sieve Size BH-1@1.5' BH-1 @4.0' Fill Terrace Deoosits l" -- 1/2" -- 3/8" -- #4 100 - #8 99 100 #16 99 99 #30 87 83 #SO 43 28 #100 22 12 #200 17 9 uses SM SP-SM 13 Ga,y Graham/ 2217 Cameo Road I Carlsbad Project No. 18-1106H5(2) REFERENCES 1. "2016 California Building Code, California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 2, Volume 2 of2", Published by International Code Council. 2. "Geologic Map of the San Diego 30' x 60' Quadrangle, California", by Michael P. Kennedy and Siang S. Tan, 2008. 3. "Geotechnical and Foundation Engineering: Design and Construction", by Robert W. Day, 1999. 4. "Maps of Known Active Fault Near-Source Zones in California and Adjacent Portions of Nevada to be used with 1997 Uniform Building Code", Published by International Conference of Building Officials. 5. "Geologic Maps of the Northwestern Part of San Diego County, California", Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology, by Siang S. Tan and Michael P. Kennedy, 1996. 6. "Bearing Capacity of Soils, Technical Engineering and Design Guides as Adapted from the US Army Corps of Engineers, No. 7", Published by ASCE Press, 1994. 7. "Foundations and Earth Structures, Design Manual 7.2", by Department of Navy Naval Facilities Engineering Command, May 1982, Revalidated by Change 1 September 1986. 8. "Ground Motions and Soil Liquefaction during Earthquakes", by H.B. Seed and J.M. Idriss, 1982. 9. "Geology of San Diego Metropolitan Area, California", Bulletin 200, by Michael P. Kennedy and Ga1y L. Peterson, 1975. 14 RECEIVED Ahl G 8 2019 {city of Carlsbad CERTIFICAT!Or~ OIF SCHOOL FEES PAID This form must be completed by the City, the applicaniHJ.ij_~~~~k~JQ~districts and returned to the City prior to issuing a building permit. The City will not issue any building permit without a completed school fee form. Project No. & Name: DEV2018-0218, GRAHAM RESIDENCE Plan Check No.: CBR2019-0373 ---------------------- Project Address: 2217 CAMEO RD ---------------------- Assessor's Parcel No.: 1670801100 ---------------------- Project Applicant: TRUST GRAHAM GARY AND TRACY TRUST 05-04-05 (Owner Name) Residential Square Feet: New/Additions: 111 ---------------------- Second Dwelling Unit: Commercial Square Feet: New/Additions: City Certification: City of Carlsbad Building Division Date: 02/15/2019 Certification of Applicant'OWners. The person executing this declaration ("Owner") certifies under penalty of perjury that (1) the information provided above is correct and true to the best of the Owner's knowledge, and that the Owner will file an amended certification of payment and pay the additional fee if Owner requests an increase in the number of dwelling units or square footage after the building permit is issued or if the initial determination of units or square footage is found to be incorrect, and that (2) the owner is the owner/developer of the above described project(s), or that the person executing this declaration is authorized to sign on behalf of the Owner. 11111 Carlsbad Unified School District 6225 El Camino Real Carlsbad CA 92009 Phone: (760) 331-5000 111111 Encinitas Union School District 101 South Rancho Santa Fe Rd Encinitas, CA 92024 Phone: (760) 944-4300 x1166 El San Dieguito Union H.S. District 684 Requeza Dr. Encinitas, CA 92024 Phone: (760) 753-6491 Ext 5514 (By Appl. Only) San Marcos Unified Sch. District 255 Pico Ave Ste. 100 San Marcos, CA 92069 Phone: (760) 290-2649 Contact: Katherine Marcelja (By Appl.only) 111111 Vista Unified School District 1234 Arcadia Drive Vista CA 92083 Phone: (760) 726-2170 x2222 SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL FEE CERTIFICATION (To be completed by the school district(s)) THIS FORM INDICATES THAT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROJECT HAVE BEEN OR WILL BE SATISFIED. The undersigned, being duly authorized by the applicable School District, certifies that the developer, builder, or owner has satisfied the obligation for school facilities. This is to certify that the applicant listed on page 1 has paid all amounts or completed other applicable school mitigation determined by the School District. The City may issue building permits for this project. Signature of Authorized School District Official: LJ..,_,,1/\.<-,,...c'c.......~.....,-~~·-~'.ivYV''-'-=~~v:n~~--C_=,,,1 MJ~=~4~D:~,A=6_,,~·-c,-Q,.,__ __ _ C"' l.s:_ ' GL-t ""~'~ "') Li Title 2 \ l<~Q £:S'D. b1:::l--::c\--kl he Date: J ---<;:-lq Name of School District CARLSBAD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Phone '1 (,, Q 3 3 / -;S"O'.:::X) 6225 a CAMINO REAL CARLSBAD1 CA 92009 Building Division 1635 Faraday Avenue I Carlsbad, CA 92008 I 760-602-271 j)'11Y -1, ,,,,J STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION NOTES 1. ALL NECESSARY EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS SHALL BE AVAILABLE ON SITE TO FACILITATE RAPID INSTALLATION OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPs WHEN RAIN IS EMINENT. 2. THE OWNER/CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES TO WORKING ORDER TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE CITY INSPECTOR AFTER EACH RUN-OFF PRODUCING RAINFALL. 3. THE OWNER/CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE CITY INSPECTOR DUE TO INCOMPLETE GRADING OPERATIONS OR UNFORESEEN CIRCUMSTANCES WHICH MAY ARISE. 4. ALL REMOVABLE PROTECTIVE DEVICES SHALL BE IN PLACE AT THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY WHEN THE FIVE (5) DAY RAIN PROBABILITY FORECAST EXCEEDS FORTY PECENT ( 40%). SILT AND OTHER DEBRIS SHALL BE REMOVED AFTER EACH RAINFALL. 5. ALL GRAVEL BAGS SHALL CONTAIN 3/4 INCH MINIMUM AGGREGATE. 6. ADEQUATE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL AND PERIMETER PROTECTION BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE MEASURES MUST BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED. 7. THE CITY INSPECTOR SHALL HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO ALTER THIS PLAN DURING OR BEFORE CONSTRUCTION AS NEEDED TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH CITY STORM WATER QUALITY REGULATIONS. OWNER'S CERTIFICATE: I UNDERSTAND AND ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I MUST: (1) IMPLEMENT BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPS) DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICABLE TO AVOID THE MOBILIZATION OF POLLUTANTS SUCH AS SEDIMENT AND TO AVOID THE EXPOSURE OF STORM WATER TO CONSTRUCTION RELATED POLLUTANTS; AND (2) ADHERE TO, AND AT ALL TIMES, COMPLY WITH THIS CITY APPROVED TIER 1 CONSTRUCTION SWPPP THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES UNTIL THE CONSTRUCTION WORK IS COMPLETE AND APPROVED BY~w~ OWNER(S),70WNER'S AGENT NAME (PRINT Y,Av,... '---J AC-,N";°c OWNER(S)/OWNER'S AGENT NAME (SIGNATURE) E-29 1.o!z.Blr°\ DATE STORM WATER COMPLIANCE FORM TIER 1 CONSTRUCTION SWPPP C6Rd{)\C\ -b3"13 BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP) SELECTION TABLE Erosion Control Sediment Control BMPs Tracking Non-Slnnn Water Waste Management and Materials BMPs Control BMPs Management BMPs Pollution Control BMPs C -C C 0 -0 0 :;:; C C -0 :;:; :;:; "' C Q) -0 Q) -0 a, C " " C "' E C E C -C ::, ::, 0 £ ·c a. C C -L L -0 Q) C "" -0 "' E "' L Q) --:;; L ·5 ~ "' C a, L £ Q) c a, a, ., ~ .E '-CT C C "' Co a. Q) ·c -C a, C L L w Q) C 0 Best Management Practice* ~ C C co a. L 0 Q) 0 L '-" Q) > :;:; :c ., 3 ., t= Q) C C Q) -Q) C -C E UL u ., :£ -0 -.; ., "" C a, C (BMP) Description ➔ a, " Q) (/") ·a a, "' Q) "' co "6 C "' C -0 "' C !!;! -Q) ~ Q) C 3c C C 0 => "5 ~ Q) -C 'a LO -cw -0 >, 0 a, C ['J E :;:; L " C 0 co v,•-"' Cl+' .,, u Q) Co "' Q) Q) X "" 0 "' 0 C Q) 0:: _E C ~~ J!:l C " en:;:; Q) ~-~ 0 Q) 0 ~ L-;;:: Q) Q) C Q) E -"" §.' .c E~ = 3: L"-:0 ·-"' ·c ~_g "' --0 .C C Q) "-" L Q) ::, -0 :.c Q) ·--0 _eb cC C U C LC Q) -"" -0 C 0 -·-g. 'o Q) Q) ::, L-.C C •-L •-C Q) L " 0 LC -Q) ~ L U C 00 CL e; 8. -.c Q) -o -0 = C •-C Q) :£ CL = Q) .c I;: -C C -L -"' .s 0 cC 0 ~u c-C -a. 0 oc '-" WO vi (/") (/") u '-" (/") > (/") (/") 0.. (/") C (/") 0:: ;;:: ct 0..0 0.. "" (/") "" (/") v,u (/")"" CASQA Designation ➔ ..... a:, "' "' .... "' <O IX) 0 N "' ..... IX) N "' ..,. "' 7 7 ..... 7 7 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I u u u (.; w w w w w w w w I!= I!= (/") (/") (/") (/") i i "" "" "" Construction Activity w w w w (/") (/") (/") (/") (/") (/") (/") (/") z z z z ;;:: ;;:: ;;:: Gradina/Soil Disturbance Trench inn /Excavation Stockpilinq Drillinn /Borina Concrete/Asohalt Sawcuttina Concrete Flatwork Pavina Conduit/Pipe Installation Stucco/Mortar Work Waste Disposal Staainn /Lav Down Area E□uinment Maintenance and Fuelinn Hazardous Substance Use/Storaae Dewaterina Site Access Across Dirt Other (listl: Instructions: 1. Check the box to the left of all applicable construction activity (first column) expected to occur during construction. 2. Located along the top of the BMP Table is a list of BMP's with it's corresponding California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA) designation number. Choose one or more BMPs you intend to use during construction from the list. Check the box where the chosen activity row intersects with the BMP column. 3. Refer to the CASQA construction handbook for information and details of the chosen BMPs and how to apply them to the project. PROJECT INFORMATION Site Address: _____________ _ Assessor's Parcel Number: --------- Emergency Contact: Name: ______________ _ 24 Hour Phone: ___________ _ Construction Threat to Storm Water Quality (Check Box) □ MEDIUM □ LOW Q) -., C ;;::-C "' Q) ::, E 0 Q) 1:' "' cc NC cc :,:::,, <O. I "" ;;:: Q) -., c-3: C Q) ., E -Q) ~ "' U C cc QC u::,, IX) I i I<.. /(_ 's< Page 1 of 1 REV 11/17