The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2233 PAMPLONA WAY; ; CB133160; Permit02-03-2015 Job Address: Permit Type: Parcel No: Valuation: Occupancy Group: # Dwelling Units: Bedrooms: Project Title: City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 Residential Permit Permit No: CBI 33160 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 2233 PAMPLONA WY CBAD RESDNTL Sub Type: SFD 2152320100 Lot#: 0 $374,061.00 Constuction Type: 5B Reference #: 1 Structure Type: 0 Bathrooms: 0 Orig PC #: TAKAMI: 2,976 SF MODULAR HOME 768 SF GARAGE Status: ISSUED Applied: 12/19/2013 Entered By: JMA Plan Approved: 06/23/2014 Issued: 06/23/2014 Inspect Area: PB Plan Check #: Applicant: KYLE VAN BUSKIRK Owner: TAKAMI TOSHIYUKI&KAYOKO 145 BENTAV SAN MARCOS 949 701-7776 CA 92078 POBOX 1430962 CARLSBADCA 92013 Building Permit $1,773.62 Meter Size FS1 Add'l Building Permit Fee ($1,107.40) Add'l Red. Water Con. Fee $0.00 Plan Check $1,241.53 Meter Fee $317.00 Add'l Plan Check Fee ($775.18) SDCWA Fee $4,492.00 Plan Check Discount $0.00 CFD Payoff Fee $0.00 Strong Motion Fee $37.41 PFF (3105540) $6,807.91 Park in Lieu Fee $0.00 PFF (4305540) $6,284.22 Park Fee $0.00 License Tax (3104193) $0.00 LFM Fee $310.00 License Tax (4304193) $0.00 Bridge Fee $0.00 Traffic Impact Fee (3105541) $2,870.00 Other Bridge Fee $0.00 Traffic Impact Fee (4305541) $0.00 BTD #2 Fee $0.00 Sidewalk Fee $0.00 BTD #3 Fee $0.00 PLUMBING TOTAL $262.00 Renewal Fee $0.00 ELECTRICAL TOTAL $85.00 Add'l Renewal Fee $0.00 MECHANICAL TOTAL $111.81 Other Building Fee $0.00 Housing Impact Fee $2,915.00 HMP Fee $937.44 Housing InLieu Fee $0.00 Pot. Water Con. Fee $3,549.00 Housing Credit Fee $0.00 Meter Size FS1 Master Drainage Fee $1,317.36 Add'l Pot. Water Con. Fee $0.00 Sewer Fee $0.00 Red. Water Con. Fee $0.00 Additional Fees $308.00 Green BIdg Stands (SB1473) Fee $12.00 Fire Sprinkler Fees $0.00 Green BIdg Stands Plan Chk Fee $0.00 Green BIdg Stands Plan Chk Fee TOTAL PERMIT FEES $31,748.72 Total Fees: $31,748.72 Total Payments to Date $31,748.72 Balance Due: $0.00 Inspector: FINAL APPROVAL Date: Z "^'/S^ Clearance: NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "Imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively refen-ed to as "fees/exactions." You have 90 days from the date this pennit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Govemment Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, sel aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project. NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which vou have oreviouslv been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previouslv otherwise expired. 06-23-2014 City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) Permit Permit No:SW130413 Job Address: Permit Type: Parcel No: Reference #: CB#: Project Title: 2233 PAMPLONA WY CBAD SWPPP 2152320100 CB133160 TAKAMI RESIDENCE Lot#: Applicant: KYLE VAN BUSKIRK 145 BENTAV SAN MARCOS CA 92078 949 701-7776 Emergency Contact: KYLE VAN BUSKIRK Status: Applied: Entered By: Issued: Inspect Area: Tier: Priority: Owner: TAKAMI TOSHIYUKI&KAYOKO POBOX 1430962 CARLSBADCA 92013 ISSUED 12/19/2013 LO 06/23/2014 1 L 949-701-7776 SWPPP Plan Check SWPPP Inspections Additional Fees $48.00 $57.00 $0.00 TOTAL PERMIT FEES $105.00 Total Fees: $105.00 Total Payments To Date: $105.00 Balance Due: $0.00 FINAL APPROVAL SIGNATUR^^ THE FOLLOWING APPROVALS REQUIRED PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE: [^X3(NNING 5*^011 IGINEERING ILDING jFIRE 5 HEALTH j HAZMAT/APCD V CITY OF CARLSBAD Building Permit Application 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008 Ph: 760-602-2719 Fax: 760-602-8558 email: buildlng@carlsbadca.gov www.carlsbadca.gov Plan Check No. 13' 5 ( laO Est.Value T 3'^^, O^f Plan Ck. Deposit Date (2,ftWl3 SWPPP 13,, JOB ADDRESS 2.'2.35 PAMPLONA WAY 215 232 01 00 CONSTH. TYPE OCC. GROUP R.U CT/PROJECT # 5781 195 # BATHROOMS 3.5 TENANT BUSINESS NAME DESCRIPTION OF WORK: tocfuda Square Feet of Affected Ana(a) NEW HOME (MANUFACTURED HOME) 2976 SF W/ 3 AHACHED 3 CAR GARAGE 768 SF FIRE SPRINKLERS YESfTlNOTl EXISTING USE VACANT LAND PROPOSED USE SFR/GAR GARAGE (SF) 768 PATIOS (SF) 0 DECKS (SF) 0 FIREPLACE YESr> NOjT] AIR CONDITIONING YESr7|N0["~] APPUCANT NAME (Primary Contact) AUN AU^IN 16^IONEJR^fl?Af APPUCANT NAME (Secondary Contact; ADDRESS ADDRESS CIT»' EL CAJON 92020 CITY iE7r~n ] I _ I FAX PHONE 619- PHONE 447-5502 EMAIL r agonthavana@coxinot EMAIL PROPERTY OWNER NAME TOSHIYUKI8. KAYOKO TAKAMI CONTRACTOR BUS. NAME ADDRESS 2549 EAST VALLY PARKWAY #113 ADDRESS CITY ESCONDIDO STATE CA ZIP 92027 CITY STATE ZIP PHONE FAX PHONE FAX EMAIL EMAIL ARCH/DESIGNER NAME & ADDRESS AUSTIN & ASSOCIATES. AUN AUSl CITY BUS. LIC.# (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Oxie: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he Is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's Ucense Law fCnapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and ProfessiOf)S Code] or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 l>y any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penahy of not more than five hundred dollars ($500)). Workeis' Coinpensation Declaration: / hereby affirm under penalty c^ perjury one of the following declarations: HI have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-Insure for worlteis' compensation as provided by Section 37(X) of the Labor Code, tbr the performance of the work for which this permit Is issued. I have and will maintain wortiers' compeneation, as lequlred by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the perfonnance of the work for whk^ this permit Is issued. My workers' compensation insurance canier and polk^ number are; Insurance Co. Policy No. Expiratfen Date This section need not be completed if the pennit Is for one hundred dollars ($100) or less. n Certificate of Exemption: I certify that in the peribmiance of the work for which this pemiit Is issued, I shall not employ any peison in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensatkx) Laws of Califbmia. WARNING: Failure to secure workais' compansation coverage is unlawful, and shall sul^ect an employer to criminal penalties and dvll fines up to one hundred thousand dollars (&100,000), In addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for In Section 3706 of the Labor code. Interest and attomey's fees. JS^ COm-RACTOR SIGNATURE • AGENT OATE / hereby afflmt that I am exempt from (kmtractor's Ucense Law for the foUowing reason: I I I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensalbn, will do the work and the stmcture is not Intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professkxis Code: The Contractor's Ucense Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or impioves thereon, and who does such wort< himself or through his own emptoyees, provkled that such Imptovements are not Intended or offered for sale. If, however, Ihe buikling or improvement is soM within one year of compietkx), the owner-builder will have the burden of ptDvIng that he dkl not buikl or Improve for the purpose of sale). 1/1 I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with Ifcensed contractois to constmct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professtons Code: The Contractor's Ucense Law does not apply to an owner of property who buikls or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) Iteensed pursuant to the Contractor's Ucense Law). [ I I am exempt under Sectton Business and Professtons Code for this reason: 1.1 personally plan to provkle the major labor and materials for constmctton of Ihe proposed property improvement flYes FTNO 2.1 (have / have not) signed an appltoatton for a buikling permit for the proposed wori(. 3.1 have contracted with the foltowing person (finn) fo uovkle the proposed constructton (include name address / phone / contractors' Itoense number): 4.1 plan to provkleaprtipns of tliftMi^i4)utijfllwj^ the folk>wing person to coonlinate, supervise and provkle the major work (Inchide name / address / phone / contractors' license number): 5.1 win (xctA^^Kw the^^fx^M I ])jl^e$tf^:(ed (Nrpd) the foltowing persons fo provkle the work indtoated (include name / address / phone / type of work): ^PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE ,.^GENT DATE /^-//-/3 Is the applteant or future buikling oaupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration fomi or risk management and prevention program under Secttons 25505,25533 or 25534 of Ihe Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? OYes Otto Is the appltoant or future building occupant required to obtain a pemiit from the air pollutfon control district or air quality management district? O Yes O No Is the facility to be constmcted within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? • Yes • No IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A RNAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT I hereby aflirnn that there Is a construclion lending agency for the perfomiance of the work this permit is Issued (Sec. 3097 (i) Civil Code). Lender's Name Lender's Address I certif that I hara read the application and stats that ttie abow Infomiatfon Is correct and that the Infon^^ I hereby authorize representative of the Qty of Cartslad to enter upon the above menttoned property Ibr inspectton purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST Aa LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAD CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GFiANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA; An OSHA permit is required Ibr excavafions over S'O' deep and demoStton or oonstaictfon of stmctures over 3 stories in height EXPIfVkTION: Brety pennit Issued t)y fte Bulbing Oflicial under Ihe provisions of this Code s^^^ 180 days from the date of such pemtH or if the ^jMn^ v«f1< ^H^f^Bd by s^l^ennit is suspended or atjandoned at any time after Ihe \flwk is commenced for a period of 180 days (Section 106.4.4 Unifcmi ftjilding Ctode). APPUCANT'S SIGNATURE //^^i^y/^^'^^^yiyY^ DATE "'/3 Inspection List Permit*: CB133160 Type: RESDNTL SFD Date Inspectjon Item Inspector Act 02/06/2015 25 Water Heater/Vents - Rl 02/06/2015 29 Final Plumbing - Ri 02/06/2015 89 Final Combo PB AP 02/03/2015 89 Final Combo - Rl 02/03/2015 89 Final Combo PB NR 02/02/2015 89 Final Combo - Rl 02/02/2015 89 Final Combo PB NR 01/22/2015 29 Final Plumbing PB AP 01/22/2015 39 Final Electrical PB AP 01/21/2015 43 AirCond/Fumace Set PB NR 11/18/2014 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall PB AP 11/18/2014 34 Rough Electric PB AP 11/13/2014 39 Final Electrical PB NR 11/06/2014 13 Shear Panels/HD's PB AP 11/06/2014 15 Roof/Reroof PB AP 10/23/2014 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PB AP 10/07/2014 22 Sewer/Water Service PB AP 10/02/2014 33 Service Change/Upgrade PB AP 09/23/2014 22 Sewer/Water Service PB AP 08/27/2014 14 Frame/Steel/BoltingAA/eldin PB AP 08/19/2014 66 Grout PB NR 08/15/2014 66 Grout PD AP 08/11/2014 15 Roof/Reroof PB AP 08/11/2014 23 Gas/Test/Repairs PB AP 07/16/2014 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PB AP TAKAMI: 2,976 SF MODULAR HOME 768 SF GARAGE Comments PAPERWORK IN WATER HEATER PAPERWORK IN WATER HEATER Monday, February 09, 2015 Page 1 of 1 EsGil Corporation In <Partnersliip •with government for (BuiCding Safety DATE: May 20, 2014 • APPLICANT • JURIS. JURISDICTION: Carlsbad • PLAN REVIEWER • FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 13-3160 SET: III PROJECT ADDRESS: 2233 Pamplona Way PROJECT NAME: Takami Garage & Manufactured Residence I I The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's codes. Xl The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. I I The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. I I The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. I I The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to fonward to the applicant contact person. I I The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: EsGil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. I I EsGil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: ) Email: Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person XI REMARKS: Each sheet of the plans must be signed by the designer. By: Kurt Culver Enclosures: EsGil Corporation • GA • EJ • MB • PC 5/16/14 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, Califomia 92123 • (858)560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576 EsGil Corporation In ^artnersHip -witli government for (BuiCding Safety DATE: April 14, 2014 • APPLICANT ^ja<)URIS. JURISDICTION: Carlsbad • PLAN REVIEWER • FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 13-3160 SET: II PROJECT ADDRESS: 2233 Pamplona Way PROJECT NAME: Takami Residence/Garage I I The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's codes. I I The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. I I The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. ^ The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. I i The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. 3 The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Alan Austin 1622 Pioneer Way El Cajon 92020 I I EsGil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. IXI EsGil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Alan Austin Telephone #: 619-440-3624 Daje contacted:>^ (^f|-vby:^(>j^ Email: Fax #: ^^iy/lail Telephone Fax In Person 3 REMARKS: Modular home. By: Kurt Culver Enclosures: EsGil Corporation • GA • EJ • MB • PC 4/9/14 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, Califomia 92123 • (858)560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad 13-3160 April 14, 2014 NOTE: The items listed below are from the previous correction list. These remaining items have not been adequately addressed. The numbers of the items are from the previous check list and may not necessarily be in sequence. The notes in bold font are current. PLANS 1. Please make all corrections, as requested in the correction list. Submit FOUR new complete sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (THREE sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. THE'RE«l4K^^lif'ttfii't:^!^ PLANS. 2. AU sheets of plans must be signed by the person responsible for their preparation. (California Business and Professions Code). 5. Per city policy, a soils report is required for this project. Please provide. REVISE THE PLANS TO SHOW THE CORRECT SLAB REBAR (AS PER THE REPORT). MISCELLANEOUS 9. New residential units must be pre-plumbed for future solar water heating. Note "two roof jacks must be installed" where the water heater is in the one story garage and directly below the most south facing roof (City Ordinance No. 8093). Note "two 3/4" copper pipes must be installed to the most convenient future solar panel location when the water heater is not in a one story garage and is not directly below the most south facing roof. (City Ordinance No. 8093) YOU DID NOT RESPOND TO THIS ITEM. Carlsbad 13-3160 April 14, 2014 To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: Yes • No • Pi^p^iiiiifiiigiiil :f^^ , SFAN^ AND 2:i2PI#GM). The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Kurt Culver at EsGil Corporation. Thank you. EsGil Corporation In (PartnersHip with government for (BuiCding Safety DATE: January 2, 2014 • APPLICANT •^URIS. JURISDICTION: Carlsbad • PLAN REVIEWER • FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 13-3160 SET: I PROJECT ADDRESS: 2233 Pamplona Way PROJECT NAME: Takami Residence/Garage I I The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's codes. I I The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. I I The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. XI The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. I I The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to fonward to the applicant contact person. XI The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Alan Austin 1622 Pioneer Way El Cajon 92020 I I EsGil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. EsGil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Alan Austin Telephone #: 619-440-3624 Date contacted: »(by: Email: Fax #: »^ail Telephone^ Fax In Person REMARKS^Modular home. By: Kurt Culver Enclosures: EsGil Corporation • GA • EJ • MB • PC 12/23/13 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, Califomia 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad 13-3160 January 2, 2014 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES PLAN CHECK NO.: 13-3160 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 2233 Pamplona Way FLOOR AREA: 3744 STORIES: 1 HEIGHT: -12' REMARKS: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: 12/19/13 DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 12/23/13 DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED: January 2, 2014 PLAN REVIEWER: Kurt Culver FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the California version of the International Residential Code, International Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Present California law mandates that construction comply with the 2010 edition of the California Code of Regulations (Title 24), which adopts the following model codes: 2009 IRC, 2009 IBC, 2009 UPC, 2009 UMC and 2008 NEC. The above regulations apply, regardless of the code editions adopted by ordinance. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 105.4 of the 2009 International Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed UP the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copv) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e.. plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked UP list when vou submit the revised plans. Carlsbad 13-3160 January 2, 2014 • PLANS 1. Please make all corrections, as requested in the correction list. Submit FOUR new complete sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (THREE sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 2. All sheets of plans must be signed by the person responsible for their preparation. (California Business and Professions Code). 3. Plans deviating from conventional wood frame construction shall have the structural portions signed and sealed by the California state licensed engineer or architect responsible for their preparation, along with structural calculations. (California Business and Professions Code). 4. An automatic residential fire sprinkler system shall be installed in one- and two-family dwellings. Please clearly note this on the plans. Section R313.2. 5. Per city policy, a soils report is required for this project. Please provide. 6. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soils report are properly incorporated into the construction documents (when required by the soil report). 7. Note on plans that surface water will drain away from building and show drainage pattern. The grade shall fall a minimum of 6" within the first 10 feet. Section R401.3. Carlsbad 13-3160 January 2, 2014 8. You have chosen to use the conventional construction bracing provisions outlined in the CRC for the garage. Provide documentation to show that the plans comply with the Braced Wall provisions of Section R602.10. Include the following: a) Documentation to show there are sufficient Braced Wall Lines in the building, per Section R602.10.1.4. b) Documentation to show there are sufficient Braced Wall Panels in each Braced Wall Line, per Section 602.10.1.2. Be sure to include all length factor adjustments from Section 602.10. c) If the above items cannot be provided or If the building does not satisfy the conventional bracing provisions, then provide design calculations from a licensed Engineer or Architect to show compliance. • MISCELLANEOUS 9. New residential units must be pre-plumbed for future solar water heating. Note "two roof jacks must be installed" where the water heater is in the one story garage and directly below the most south facing roof (City Ordinance No. 8093). Note "two 3/4" copper pipes must be installed to the most convenient future solar panel location when the water heater is not in a one story garage and is not directly below the most south facing roof. (City Ordinance No. 8093) 10. To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. 11. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. • Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: Yes • No • 12. The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Kurt Culver at EsGil Corporation. Thank you. Carlsbad 13-3160 January 2, 2014 [DO NOT PAY- THIS IS NOT AN INVOICE] VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 13-3160 PREPARED BY: Kurt Culver DATE: January 2, 2014 BUILDING ADDRESS: 2233 Pamplona Way BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R3/U TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V-B BUILDING PORTION AREA (Sq. Ft.) Valuation Multiplier Reg. Mod. VALUE ($) House 2976 26.34 78,388 Garage 768 28.74 22,072 Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE 100,460 Jurisdiction Code cb By Ordinance BIdg. Permit Fee by Ordinance Plan Checl< Fee by Ordinance Type of Review; • Repetitive Fee Repeats [3 Complete Review • Other |--| Hourly EsGil Fee • Structural Only Hr. @ * $699.54 $454.70 $391.74 Comments: Modular home. Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue.doc + PLAN CHECK Community & Economic CITY OF REVIEW Development Department 1635 Faraday Avenue CARLSBAD TRANSMITTAL Carlsbad CA 92008 w/w/w/.carlsbadca.gov DATE: 5/27/2014 PROJECT NAME: l akami Residence PROJECT ID: PLAN CHECK NO: CB 133,60 SET#: III ADDRESS: 22:^3 Pamplona Wy APN: 215-232-01-00 VALUATION: $ 137,767 SCOPE OF WORK: 2,976 sf manufactured home with attached 3-car garage is plan check review is complete and has been APPROVED by: LAND DEVELOPIVIENT ENGINEERING DIVISION A Final Inspection by the Construction Mgmt & Inspection Division is required ^ Yes No To detemiine status by one or more of these divisions, please contact 760- 602-2719. This plan check review is NOT COMPLETE. Items missing or incorrect are listed on the attached checklist. Please resubmit amended plans as required. Plan Check Comments have been sent to:agenthavana@c()x.net PLANNING 760-602-4610 ENGINEERING 760-602-2750 FIRE PREVENTION 760-602-4665 Kathleen Lawrence 760-602-2741 Kathleen.Lawrence@carlsbadca.gov \/ Linda Ontiveros /\ 760-602-2773 Linda.Ontiveros@carlsbadca.gov Remarks: APPUCANT TO COMPLETE STORM WA IM FORMS AND PROVIDE EMERGENCY CONT A CT INEORMA TION W 1^ \ STORM WATER COMPLIANCE FORM Land Development Engineering 1635 Faraday Avenue TIER 1 CONSTRUCTION SWPPP Land Development Engineering 1635 Faraday Avenue CARLSBAD E-29 760-602-2750 www.carlsbadca.gov STORM WATER COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE My project is not in a category of permit types exempt from the Construction SWPPP requirements My project is not located inside or within 200 feet of an environmentally sensitive area with a significant potential for contributing pollutants to nearby receiving waters by way of storm water runoff or non-storm water discharge(s). My project does not require a grading plan pursuant to the Carlsbad Grading Ordinance (Chapter 15.16 of fhe Carlsbad Municipal Code) ^ My project will not result in 2,500 square feet or more of soils disturbance including any associated construction staging, stockpiling, pavement removal, equipment storage, refueling and maintenance areas that meets one or more of the additional following criteria: • located within 200 feet of an environmentally sensitive area or the Pacific Ocean; and/or, • disturbed area is located on a slope with a grade at or exceeding 5 horizontal to 1 vertical; and/or • disturbed area is located along or within 30 feet of a storm drain inlet, an open drainage channel or watercourse; and/or • construction will be initiated during the rainy season or will extend into the rainy season (Oct. 1 through April 30). I CERTIFY TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE CHECKED STATEMENTS ARE TRUE AND CORRECT, I AM SUBMITTING FOR CITY APPROVAL A TIER 1 CONSTRUCTION SWPPP PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF CITY STANDARDS. I UNDERSTAND AND ACKNOWLEDGE THAT 1 MUST; (1) IMPLEMENT BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPS) DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICABLE TO MINIMIZE THE MOBILIZATION OF POLLUTANTS SUCH AS SEDIMENT AND TO MINIMIZE THE EXPOSURE OF STORM WATER TO CONSTRUCTION RELATED POLLUTANTS; AND. (2) ADHERE TO, AND AT ALL TIMES, COMPLY WITH THIS CITY APPROVED TIER 1 CONSTRUCTION SWPPP THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES UNTIL THE CONSTRUCTION WORK IS COMPLETE AND APPROVED BY THE CITY OF CARLSBAD. OWNEFyfS)/OWNE« S AGENT NAME (PRINT) ^AGENT NAME (SIGNATURE) DATE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION NOTES 1. ALL NECESSARY EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS SHALL BE AVAILABLE ON SITE TO FACILITATE RAPID INSTALLATION OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS WHEN RAIN IS EMINENT. 2. THE OWNER/CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES TO WORKING ORDER TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE CITY ENGINEER AFTER EACH RUN-OFF PRODUCING RAINFALL. 3. THE OWNER/CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE CITY ENGINEERING OR BUILDING INSPECTOR DUE TO UNCOMPLETED GRADING OPERATIONS OR UNFORESEEN CIRCUMSTANCES WHICH MAY ARISE 4. ALL REMOVABLE PROTECTIVE DEVICES SHALL BE IN PLACE AT THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY WHEN THE FIVE (5) DAY RAIN PROBABILITY FORECAST EXCEEDS FORTY PERCENT (40%). SILT AND OTHER DEBRIS SHALL BE REMOVED AFTER EACH RAINFALL. 5. ALL GRAVEL BAGS SHALL BE BURLAP TYPE WITH 3/4 INCH MINIMUM AGGREGATE. 6. ADEQUATE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL AND PERIMETER PROTECTION BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE MEASURES MUST BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED. SPECIAL NOTES PROJECT INFORMATION Site Address; 2233 PAMPLONA WAY Assessor's Parcel Number: 215-232-01 -00 Project ID; CB 13-3160 Construction Permit No.; SW 13-413 Estimated Construction Start Date 07/16/2014 Project Duration 4-6 Months Emergency Contact; Name KYLE VAN BUSKIRK 24 hour Phone: 949-701-7776 Perceived Threat to Stonm Water Quality Medium [7] Low If medium box is checked, must attach a site plan sheet showing proposed work area and location of proposed structural BMPs For City Use Only CITY OF CARLSBAD STANDARfiOlER 1 SWPPP Approved By: Date: E-29 Page 1 of 3 REV 4/30/10 Erosion Control BMPs Sediment Control BMPs Tracking Control BMPs Non-Storm Water Management BMPs Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control BMPs Best Management Practice (BMP) Description Geotextiles & Mats Wood Mulching Earth Dikes and Drainage Swales Slope Drains Silt Fence Sediment Trap Check Dam Fiber Rolls Gravel Bag Benn Street Sweeping and Vacuuming Sandbag Banier Storm Drain Inlet Protection Stabilized Construction Ingress/Egress Stabilized Construction Roadway Water Conservation Practices Paving and Grinding Ooerations Potable Water/lnigation Vehicle and Equipment Cleanina Material Delivery and Storaae Material Use Stockpile Management Spill Prevention and Cnntrnl Solid Waste Hazardous Waste Manaoement Concrete Waste CASQA Designation -> Construction Activity EC-7 EC-8 EC-9 EC-11 SE-1 SE-3 SE-4 SE-5 SE-6 SE-7 SE-8 SE-10 TR-1 TR-2 NS-1 NS-3 NS-7 NS-8 WM-1 WM-2 WM-3 WM-4 WM-5 WM-6 WM-8 s Grading/Soil Disturbance X X X A / Trenching/Excavation Stockpiling X" Drilling/Boring Concrete/Asphalt Saw cutting . Concrete flatworic Paving Conduit/Pipe Installation Stucco/Mortar Woric Waste Disposal Staging/Lay Down Area Equipment Maintenance and Fueling Hazardous Substance Use/Storage Dewatering Site Access Across Dirt Other (list): Instructions: Begin by reviewing the list of constmction activities and cliecking the box to the left of any activity that will occur during the proposed construction. Add any other activity descriptions in the blank activity description boxes provkled for that purpose and place a check in the box immediately to the left of the added activity description. For each activity descrribed, pick one or more best management practices (BMPs) from ttie list located along the top of the fomi. Then place an X in Uie box at the place wtiere ttie activity row intersects with the BMP column. Do this for each activity that was checked off and for each of the selected BMPs selected from the list. For Example - If the project includes site access across dirt, then chec* the box to ttie left of "Site Access Across Dirf. Then review the list for something that applies such as "Stabilized Construction Ingress/Egress" under Tracking Control. Follow along the "Site Access Across Dirt" row until you get to the "Stabilized Constmction Ingress/Egress" column and place an X in the box wtiere ttie two meet. As another example say ttie project included a stockpile that you intend to cover with a plastic sheet. Since plastic sheeting is not on the list of BMPs, then write in "Cover vwth Plastte" in the blank column under the heading Erosion Control BMPs. Then place an X in the box where the "Stockpiling" row intersects the new "Cover with Plastto" column. To learn more about what each BMP description means, you may wish to review the BMP Reference Handout prepared to assist applkants in the selection of appropriate Best Management Practice measures. The reference also explains the Califomia Stomiwater Quality Association (CASQA) designation and how to apply the various selected BMPs to a project. E-29 Page 2 of 3 REV 4/30/10 PLAN CHECK PLAN CHECK Community & Economic ^ CITY OF REVIEW Development Department 1635 Faraday Avenue CARLSBAD TRANSMITTAL Carlsbad CA 92008 www.carlsbadca.gov DATE: 4/16/2014 PROJECT NAIVIE: lakami Residence PROJECT ID: PLAN CHECK NO: CB133160 SET#: II ADDRESS: 223.^ Pamplona Wy APN: 215-232 01-00 VALUATION: S137,767 SCOPE OF WORK: 2,976 st" manufactured home with attached 3-car garage This plan check review is complete and has been APPROVED by: LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION A Final Inspection by the Construction Mgmt & inspection Division is required Yes No To determine status by one or more o,f these divisions, please contact 760-602-2719. X This plan check review is NOT COMPLETE. Items missing or incorrect are listed on the attached checklist. Please resubmit amended plans as required. Plan Check Comments have been sent toiagcnthavanadf cox.net ^(^~ ^M'0^^)(^2-^ PLANNING 760-602-4610 ENGINEERING 760-602-2750 FIRE PREVENTION 760-602-4665 Kathleen Lawrence 760-602-2741 Kathleen.Lawrence@carlsbadca.gov v/ Linda Ontiveros /\ 760-602-2773 Linda.Ontiveros@carlsbadca.gov Remarks: Tal<ami Residence PLAN CHECK NO # CB133160 Please Read Instructions: Outstanding issues are marked witii X . Items tiiat conform to permit requirements are marlced witii / or liave intentionally been left blank. 1. SITE PLAN Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Siiow: / North arrow /, Existing & proposed structures / Existing street improvements Property lines (show all dimensions) ^ Easements / Right-of-way width & adjacent streets Driveway widths / Existing or proposed sewer lateral / Existing or proposed water service Submit on signed approved plans: DWG No. Siiow on site plan: / Drainage patterns Building pad surface drainage must maintain a minimum slope of one percent towards an adjoining street or an approved drainage course. ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE: "Finish grade will provide a minimum positive drainage of 2% to swale 5' away from building". Existing & proposed slopes and topography Size, location, alignment of existing or proposed sewer and water service(s) that serves the project. Each unit requires a separate service; however, second dwelling units and apartment complexes are an exception. Sewer and water laterals should not be located within proposed driveways, per standards. Include on title stieet: • Site address / Assessor's parcel number / Legal description/lot number For commercial/industrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, Include: total building square footage with the square footage for each different use, existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing, warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved. Show ali existing use of SF and new proposed use of SF. Example: Tenant improvement for 3500 SF of warehouse to 3500 SF of office. E-36 Lot/Map No.: LOT195 Subdivision/Tract: La Costa Valley Unit 4 Reference No(s): IVI5781 Page 2 of 6 REV 6/01/12 Takami Residence PLANCHECK NO # CB133160 2. DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE / Project does not comply with the following engineering conditions of approval for project no. 3. DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS Dedication for all street rights-of-way adjacent to the building site and any storm drain or utility easements on the building site Is required for all new buildings and for remodels with a value at or exceeding $ 20,000.00 , pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.030. For single family residence, easement dedication will be completed by the City of Carlsbad, cost $115.00. / Dedication required as follows: 4. IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the construction exceeds $100,000.00, pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.040. / Public improvements required as follows: Construction of the public improvements must be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad IVIunicipal Code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title report or current grant deed on the property and processing fee nf $ 441 nn so we may prepare the necessary Neighborhood Improvement Agreement. This agreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the city prior to issuance of a building permit. Future public improvements required as follows: E-36 Page 3 of 6 Takami Residence PLAN CHECK NO # CB133160 5. GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS The conditions that require a grading permit are found in Section 15.16 of the Municipal Code. / Inadequate Information available on site plan to make a determination on grading requirements. Include accurate grading quantities in cubic yards (cut, fill, import, export and remedial). This information must be included on the plans. If no grading is proposed write: "NO GRADING" Grading Permit required. NOTE: The grading permit must be issued and rough grading approval obtained prior to issuance of a building permit. Graded Pad Certification required. (Note: Pad certification may be required even if a grading permit is not required.) All reouired documentation must be orovided to your Engineering Construction Inspector The inspector will then provide the engineering counter with a release for the building permit. No grading permit required. Minor Grading Permit required. See attached marked-up submittal checklist for project- specific requirements. 6. MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in city right-of-way and/or private work adjacent to the public right-of-way. Types of work include, but are not limited to: street improvements, tree trimming, driveway construction, tying Into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities. Right-of-way permit required for: E-36 Page 4 of 6 REV 6/01/12 Takami Residence PLAN CHECK NO # CB133160 SW 13-413 7. STORM WATER Construction Compliance Project Threat Assessment Form complete. Enclosed Project Threat Assessment Form incomplete. Requires Tier 1 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan. Please complete attached form and return (SW ) X Requires Tier 2 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan. Requires submittal of Tier 2 SWPPP, payment of processing fee and review by city. Post-Deveiopment (SUSMP) Compliance Storm Water Standards Questionnaire complete. Storm Water Standards Questionnaire incomplete. Please make the corrections, re-sign the questionnaire and resubmit with next submittal. / Project is subject to Standard Storm Water Requirements. See city Standard Urban Storm Water Management Plan (SUSMP) for reference. http://www.carlsbadca.qQv/business/buildinq/Documents/EnqStandsw-stds-vol4-ch2.pdf Project needs to incorporate low impact development strategies throughout in one or more of the following ways: Rainwater harvesting (rain barrels or cistern) Vegetated Roof Bio-retentions cell/rain garden Pervious pavement/pavers Flow-through planter/vegetated or rock drip line Vegetated swales or rock Infiltration swales Downspouts disconnect and discharge over landscape Other: E-36 Page 5 of 6 REV 6/01/12 Takami Residence PLAN CHECK NO # CB133160 8. WATER METER REVIEW Domestic (potable) Use / What size meter is required? FY! Where a residential unit is required to have an automatic fire extinguishing system, the minimum meter size shall be a 1" meter. NOTE: the connection fee, SDCWA system capacity charge and the water treatment capacity charge will be based on the size of the meter necessary to meet the water use requirements. FYI For residential units the minimum size meter shall be 5/8", except where the residential unit is larger than 3,500 square feet or on a lot larger than one quarter (1/4) acre where the meter size shall be Vt. 9. FEES / Required fees have been entered in building permit. / Drainage fee applicable Added square feet Added square footage in last two years? Permit No. Permit No. Project built after 1980 Impervious surface > 50% Impact unconstructed facility Fire sprinklers required yes Upgrade yes No fees required yes yes yes yes no no no no no (is addition over 150' from center line) no 10. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS Forms E-32 and E-33 help determine tlie appropriate Storm water pollution prevention plan which shall comply with current requirements and provisions established by the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board and City of Carisbad requirements. Once appropriate Tier level is determined, it must be prepared, submitted and reviewed prior to issuance of the building permit. Form E-34 determined whether the project is subject to Priority development project requirements (PDP). A PDP requires preparation and processing of a Storm Water IVIanagement Plan which is subject to city engineer approval. The purpose is to demonstrate how this project meets new/current storm water treatment requirements per the City's SUSIVIP. In addition to new treatment control BMP selection criteria in the SUSMP, the developer shail use low impact development approaches to ensure runoff from impervious areas prior to discharge. Attachments: Engineering Application / Storm Water Form RIght-of-Way Application/Info. Reference Documents E-36 Page 6 of 6 REV 6/01/12 Fee Calculation Worksheet ENGINEERING DIVISION Prepared by: LINDA ONTIVEROS Date: 12/27/13 GEO DATA: LFMZ: 6 / B&T: Address: 2233 Pamplona Wy BIdg. Permit #: CB13-3160 Fees Update by: Date: Fees Update by: Date: EDU CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses. Types of Use: SFD Sq.Ft./Units EDU's LEUCADIA Types of Use: Sq.Ft./Units EDU's Types of Use: Sq.Ft./Units EDU's Types of Use: Sq.Ft./Units EDU's ADT CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses, Types of Use: SFD Sq.Ft./Units 1 ADT's 10 Types of Use: Sq.Ft./Units ADT's Types of Use: Sq.Ft./Units ADT's Types of Use: Sq.Ft./Units ADT's FEES REQUIRED: Within CFD: YES (no bridge & thoroughfare fee in District #1, reduces Traffic Impact Fee) / NO 1. PARK-IN-LIEU FEE: NW QUADRANT NE QUADRANT SE QUADRANT W QUADRANT ADT'S/UNITS: X FEE/ADT: =$ 2.TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE: ADT'S/UNITS: 1 X FEE/ADT: 2870 =$ 2870 3. BRIDGE & THOROUGHFARE FEE: DIST. #1 DIST.#2 DIST.#3 (USE SANDAG)ADT'S/UNITS X FEE/ADT: =$ 4. FACILITIES MANAGEMENT FEE ZONE: 6 ADT'S/UNITS: 1 X FEE/SQ.FT./UNIT: 310 =$ 310 5. SEWER FEE EDU's X FEE/EDU: =$ LEUCADIA BENEFIT AREA: EDU's X FEE/EDU: =$ 6. DRAINAGE FEES: D PLDA: HIGH MED UM / LOW ACRES: .66 X FEE/AC: 1996 =$ 658.68 7. POTABLE WATER FEES: UNITS CODE CONN. FEE METER FEE SDCWA FEE TOTAL 1 FS1 3549 317 4800 8,666 ***This may not represent a comprehensive list of fees due for this project. Please contact the Building division at (760) 602-2719 for a complete listing of fees* f.!TY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DIVISION BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST P-28 Development Services Planning Division 1635 Faraday Avenue (760) 602-4610 www.carlsbadca.eov DATE: 6-19-14 PROJECT NAIVIE: PROJECTID: PLAN CHECK NO: CB 13-3160 SET#: 4 ADDRESS: 2233 Pamplona Way APN: 215-232-01 3 This plan check review is complete and has been APPROVED by the Planning Division. By: Chris Sexton A Final Inspection by the Planning Division is required • Yes ^ No You may also have corrections from one or more of the divisions listed below. Approval from these divisions may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Resubmitted plans should include corrections from all divisions. This plan checl< review is NOT COMPLETE. Items missing or incorrect are listed on the attached checklist. Please resubmit amended plans as required. Plan Check Comments have been sent to: agenthavana@cox.net For questions or clarifications on the attached checklist please contact the following reviewer as marked: PLANNING 760-602-4610 ENGINEERING 760-602-2750 FIRE PREVENTION 760-602-4665 Chris Sexton 760-602-4624 Chris.Sexton@carlsbadca.gov Kathleen Lawrence 760-602-2741 Kathleen.Lawrence@carlsbadca.gov Greg Ryan 760-602-4663 GregorY.Rvan@carlsbadca.gov Gina Ruiz 760-602-4675 Gina.Ruiz@carlsbadca.gov Linda Ontiveros 760-602-2773 Linda.Ontiveros@carlsbadca.gov Cindy Wong 760-602-4662 Cvnthia.Wong@carlsbadca.gov Dominic Fieri 760-602-4664 Dominic.Fieri@carlsbadca.gov Remarks: Plan Check No. CB 13-3160 Address 2233 Pamplona Way Date 6-19-14 Review # 4 Planner Chris Sexton Phone (760) 602-4624 Type of Project & Use: new sfr Net Project Density: DU/AC Zoning: R-1-10.000 General Plan: RLM Facilities Management Zone: 6 CFD (in/out) #_Date of participation: Remaining net dev acres: (For non-residential development: Type of land use created by this permit: ) REVIEW #: 12 3 Legend: ^ Item Complete • Item Incomplete - Needs your action lEl • • Environmental Review Required: YES • NO • TYPE DATE OF COMPLETION: Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: lEl • • Discretionary Action Required: YES • NO • TYPE APPROVAL/RESO. NO. DATE PROJECT NO. OTHER RELATED CASES: Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: • • Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance Project site located in Coastal Zone? YES D NO ]^ CA Coastal Commission Authority? YES • NO Q If California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact them at - 7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite 103, San Diego, CA 92108^402; (619) 767-2370 Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt): • • Habitat IVIanagement Plan Data Entry Completed? YES |E1 NO • If property has Habitat Type identified in Table 11 of HMP, complete HMP Permit application and assess fees in Permits Plus (A/P/Ds, Activity Maintenance, enter CB#, toolbar, Screens, HMP Fees, Enter Acres of Habitat Type impacted/taken, UPDATE!) Q O Inclusionary Housing Fee required: YES Q NO Q (Effective date of Inclusionary Housing Ordinance - May 21, 1993.) Data Entry Completed? YES • NO • (A/P/Ds, Activity Maintenance, enter CB#, toolbar. Screens, Housing Fees, Construct Housing Y/N, Enter Fee, UPDATE!) • • Housing Tracking Form (form P-20) completed: YES • NO • N/AQ p-28 Page 2 of 3 07/11 Site Plan: Provide a fully dimensional site plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of- way width, dimensional setbacks and existing topographical lines (including all side and rear yard slopes). Provide legal description of property and assessor's parcel number. City Council Policy 44 - Neighborhood Architectural Design Guidelines • • 1. Applicability: YES • NO lEl • • 2. Project complies: YES • NOQ • • • • KI • • S • • K • • • • • Zoning: 1. Setbacks: Front: Interior Side: Street Side: Rear: Top of slope: Required 201 Shown 20' Required 10^ Shown 10' Required W Shown 15'8" Required 20: Shown 26'7" Required Shown 2. Accessory structure setbacks: N/A Front: Interior Side: Street Side: Rear: Structure separation: 3. Lot Coverage; 4. Height: 5. Parking: Required. Required. Required Required. Required Shown. Shown Shown. Shown. Shown Required <40% Shown 27.4% Required <30' with min. 3:12 roof pitch Shown <30' Spaces Required 2 Shown 2 (breakdown by uses for commercial and industrial projects required) Residential Guest Spaces Required Shown Additional Comments 1) Please provide a biology letter so Planning can assess the habitat management fees for the vacant lot. 4-9-14 Same comments as before. 5-15-14 SAME COMMENT AS BEFORE. OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER Chris Sexton DATE 6-19-14 p-28 Page 3 of 3 07/11 ^ CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DIVISION BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST P-28 Development Services Planning Division 1635 Faraday Avenue (760) 602-4610 www.carhbadca.eov DATE: 6-19-14 PROJECT NAIVIE: PROJECTID: PLAN CHECK NO: CB 13-3160 SET#: 4 ADDRESS: 2233 Pamplona Way APN: 215-232-01 ^ Tliis plan check review Is complete and has been APPROVED by the Planning Division. By: Chris Sexton A Final Inspection by the Planning Division is required • Yes ^ No Vou may also have corrections from one or more of the divisions listed below. Approval from these divisions may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit Resubmitted plans should include corrections from all divisions. This plan check review is NOT COMPLETE. Items missing or Incorrect are listed on the attached checklist. Please resubmit amended plans as required. Plan Check Comments have been sent to: agenthavana@cox.net For questions or clarifications on the attached checklist please contact the following reviewer as marked: PLANNING 760-602-4610 ENGINEERING 760-602-2750 FIRE PREVENTION 760-602-4665 X Chris Sexton 760-602-4624 Chris.Sexton@carlsbadca.gov Kathleen Lawrence 760-602-2741 Kathleen.Lawrence@carlsbadca.gov Greg Ryan 760-602-4663 G regory. Ryan@ca rlsbadca.gov Gina Ruiz 760-602-4675 Gina.Ruiz@carlsbadca.gov Linda Ontiveros 760-602-2773 Linda.Ontiveros@carlsbadca.gov Cindy Wong 760-602-4662 Cynthia.Wong@carlsbadca.gov • • 1 Dominic Fieri 760-602-4664 Dominic.Fieri@carlsbadca.goy Remarks: REVIEW #: Plan Check No. CB 13-3160 Address 2233 Pamplona Way Date 6-19-14 Review # 4 Planner Chris Sexton Phone (760) 602-4624 Type of Project & Use: new sfr Net Project Density: DU/AC Zoning: R-1-10.000 General Plan: RLM Facilities Management Zone: 6 CFD (in/out) #_Date of participation: Remaining net dev acres: (For non-residential development: Type of land use created by this permit: ) 12 3 Legend: |EI Item Complete • Item Incomplete - Needs your action 13 • • Environmental Review Required: YES • NO • TYPE DATE OF COMPLETION: Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: 13 • • Discretionary Action Required: YES • NO • TYPE APPROVAL/RESO. NO. DATE PROJECT NO. OTHER RELATED CASES: Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: • • Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance Project site located in Coastal Zone? YES Q NO El CA Coastal Commission Authority? YES • NO Q If California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact them at - 7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite 103, San Diego, CA 92108-4402; (619) 767-2370 Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt): • • Habitat Management Plan Data Entry Completed? YES ^ NO • If property has Habitat Type identified in Table 11 of HMP, complete HMP Permit application and assess fees in Permits Plus (A/P/Ds, Activity Maintenance, enter CB#, toolbar. Screens, HMP Fees, Enter Acres of Habitat Type impacted/taken, UPDATE!) n n Inclusionary Housing Fee required: YES O NO Q (Effective date of Inclusionary Housing Ordinance - May 21, 1993.) Data Entry Completed? YES • NOD (A/P/Ds, Activity Maintenance, enter CB#, toolbar. Screens, Housing Fees, Construct Housing Y/N, Enter Fee, UPDATE!) • • Housing Tracking Form (form P-20) completed: YES • NO • N/A • p-28 Page 2 of 3 07/11 Site Plan: 3 • • Provide a fully dimensional site plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of- way width, dimensional setbacks and existing topographical lines (including all side and rear yard slopes). Provide legal description of property and assessor's parcel number. City Council Policy 44 - Neighborhood Architectural Design Guidelines • • 1. Applicability: YES • NO 3 • • 2. Project complies: YES • NOO Zoning: • • • • 1. Setbacks: Front: interior Side: Street Side: Rear: Top of slope: Required 20; Required lO: Required lO; Required 20: Required 2. Accessory structure setbacks: N/A Front: Required Interior Side: Required Street Side: Required Rear: Required Structure separation: Required Shown 20; Shown io: Shown 15:8: Shown 26'7" Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown 3 • • 3 • • ^ • • • • • 3. Lot Coverage: 4. Height: 5. Parking: Required <40% Shown 27.4% Required <30' with min. 3:12 roof pitch Shown <30' Spaces Required 2 Shown 2 (breakdown by uses for commercial and industrial projects required) Residential Guest Spaces Required Shown Additional Comments 1) Please provide a biology letter so Planning can assess the habitat management fees for the vacant lot. 4-9-14 Same comments as before. 5-15-14 SAME COMMENT AS BEFORE. OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER Chris Sexton DATE 6-19-14 P-28 Page 3 of 3 07/11 This design prepared from computer input by PACIFIC TRUSS LUMBER SPECIFICATIONS TC: 2x4 DF #2 BC: 2x4 DF #2 WEBS: 2x4 DF «2 TC LATERAL SUPPORT <= 12'0C. UON. BC LATERAL SUPPORT « 12'0C. UON. Connector plats prefix designators: C,CN,C1B,CNia (or no prefix) - CoepuTrus, Inc H,U20HS,U18HS,llt6 - UlTek HT series TRUSS SPAN 24'- 0.0" LOAD DURATION INCREASE > 1.25 SPACED 24.0- O.C. LOADING LL( 20.0)+DL( 14.0) ON TOP CHORD = 34.0 PSF DL OH BOTTQU CHORD = 5.0 PSF TOTAL LOAD = 39.0 PSF BOnOU CHORD CHECKED FOB 10PSF LIVE LOAD. TOP AND BOTTOM CHORD LIVE LOADS ACT NON-CONCURRENTLY. BEARING LOCATIONS 0'- 0.0" 24'- 0.0' CBC2010/IBC2009 MAX UEUBER FORCES 4W /GDF/Cq^l.OD 1- 2=(-2196) 462 1-6=(-416) 2018 2-6=(-46B) 135 2- 3=(-leai) 365 6-7=(-279) 1320 6-3=( -68) 579 3- 4=(-leei) 365 7-5=(-4ie) 2018 3-7=( -68) 579 4- 5=(-2196) 462 7-4=(-45B) 135 UAX VERT REACTIONS -37/ 936V -37/ 936V UAX HORZ REACTIONS -86/ 86H -86/ 86H BRG SIZE 3.50' 3.50" REQUIRED BRO AREA SQ.IN. (SPECIES) 1 .50 DF ( 625) 1.50 OF ( 625) RECEIVED VERTICAL DEFLECTION LIMITS: LL=L/360, TL=L/240 UAX LL DEFL ' -0.098" » 12'- 0.0" Allowed = 0.7B1' MAX TL CREEP DEFL = -0.232" * 8'- 3.2" Allowed = 1.171" 12-00 DEC 1 9 2013 CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DIVISION MAX HORIZ. LL DEFL = 0.031" * UAX HORIZ. TL DEFL = 0.060" 8 23' -23'-8.5" 8.5" 6-04-14 5-07-02 12-00 5-07-02 Design conforis to lain windforce-resisting systei and coiponents and cladding criteria. Wind: 90 iph, h=15tt, TCDL=8.4,BCDL=3.0, ASCE 7-05, Enclosed, Cat.2, Exp.C, UWFRS, interior zone, load duration factor=l.6 -T 6-04-14 12 4.00 M-1.5X4 12 4.00 M-1.5X4 EST ^r?3 M-2.5X6 6 U-3x4 M-3x6(S) 7 M-3x4 M-2.5X6 8-03-04 7-05-08 J< 8-03-04 12-00 12-00 24-00 JOB NAUE: lay - UAY-T1 Scale: 0.3278 Truss: MAY-T1 DES. BY: AM DATE: 9/3/2013 SEQ.: 5647538 TRANS ID: 378020 WARNKOSt 1. Builder and erection contractor sIrouU tM advised of al General Notes and WaminDs before constmction commences. 2. 2x4 compression web txadno must be instaled wlwra strowo+. 3. Addtlonsl temporary bradng to insure ilabrily during construction a ttre tesponsiMity ot ttie erector. Addttonal permanem bracing of the overal structure Is the responsibly of the buiding designer. 4. No load should be applad to any componani unti allar al bracing and fasteners are comptele and at ho time ahouU any loaiSs greater than design loads be appBsd to any oompoiwnl. 5. CompuTrus has no control over and assumes no responslbiily lor the MxicMioo, handling, shipmeni and InsttMlon of convoneMs. e. This design Is furnished subject to the Imilallons set ferth by TPlrwrcA m BCSI. copies of which wil be kmlshed upon raquest. Mrrek USA, IncVCompuTius Softwar* 7.6.3-SP4(1L)-E QENERAL NOTES, unless oltwnnse noted. 1. This design Is based only upon Uie peremeteis shown and is for an Individual buUIng component. AppacabHty of design parameters and proper incorporation of comprment Is the responsitility of the buiding designer. 2. Design assumes tha top and bottom chords to be latera% braced al 2' ox. and at Iff o.c. tespectnaly unless braced throughout their length by conlinuaus sheathing such as plywaod sheathmgCTC) and/or drywaljBC). 3. 2x Impact bridging or lateral bracing rei)ulred where shown 4. InatelationoftnissistheresponsllAtyoftherespecllveconlTaclor. 5. Design assumes tnisses are to be used in a non-OKToslvaenvlrDnmenl, and are for'dry condition'of use. e. Design assumes lul bearing at al supports shown. Shim or wedge If necessary. 7. Oealgn assumes adeiiuale drainage Is provided, t. Plales shal be localad on both laces Of tniss. and placad so their cenier mes cahclds with joint center ines. e. Dlgls Indicate size of pMe in Inches. 10. For basic cannedarpMa dtsqn values see ESR-1311. ESR-1«BS (MITak) Job Transmittal MiTek USA, Inc. 250 Klug Circle, Corona, CA 92880 (951) 245-9525 Fax (951) 273-0040 Transaction ID: 398189 TO: PACIFIC TRUSS ATT: Joel Coombs, Matt Lowery DATE: 5/7/2014 Drawings Repairs Sequence #'s Description 0 5921210-5921211 takamil Transmittal Notes: Design Notes: 4 5/7/2014 3:00:02 PM Page 1 This design prepared from computer input by PACIFIC TRUSS LUUBER SPECIFICATIONS TC: 2x4 DF #2 BC: 2x4 DF #UBTR WEBS: 2x4 DF K TC UTERAL SUPPORT <= 12"0C. UON. BC LATERAL SUPPORT <= 12'0C. UON. 11-1.5x4 where shown; Jt8:2-3,5,7,9-10 Connector plate prefix designators: C,CN,C18,CN18 (or no prefix) = CoipuTrus, Inc U,M20HS,M18HS,M16 - HlTek MT series TRUSS SPAN 32'- 0.0" LOAD DURATION INCREASE =1.25 SPACED 24.0" O.C. LOADING LL( 20.0)+DL( 14.D) ON TOP CHORD = 34.0 PSF DL ON BOTTOII CHORD = 5.0 PSF TOTAL LOAD = 39.0 PSF LIMITED STORAGE DOES NOT APPLY DUE TO THE SPATIAL REQUIREMENTS OF CBC 2013 NOT BEING MET. BOTTOM CHORD CHECKED FOR 10PSF LIVE LOAD. TOP AND BOTTOM CHORD LIVE LOADS ACT NON-CONCURRENTLY. 1- 2= 2- 3-- 3- 4= 4- 5= 5- 6= 6- 7= 7- 8= 8- 9= 9- 10= 10-11= CBC2013/IBC2012 MAX MEMBER FORCES 4W /GDF/Cq=1.00 5610) 0 1-12=(0) 5487 2-12=(-206) 55 15-10=(-206) 55 " •"• 3-12=(-221) " (-5371 (-5371) (-4299) (-4298) (-4298) (-4299) (-5371) (-5371) (-5609) 12- 13=(0) 4780 13- 14=(0) 3568 14- 15=(0) 4780 15- 11=(0) 5487 BEARING LOCATIONS 0'- 0.0' 32'- 0.0" 12- 4= 4- 13=(. 5- 13=(-13- 6=( 6- 14=( 14- 7=( Oj 589 645) 0 204 ) 3 0) 896 0) 896 204) 3 14- 8=(-645) 0 8-15=( 0) 588 15- 9=(-221) 0 MAX VERT REACTIONS 0/ 1248V 0/ 1248V BRG SIZE 3.50-3.SO- REQUIRED BAG AREA SQ.IN. (SPECIES) 2.00 DF ( 625) 2.00 DF ( 625) VERTICAL DEFLECTION LIMITS: LL=L/360, TL=L/240 MAX LL DEFL = -0.617- e 16'- 0.0" Allowed = 1.047' MAX TL CREEP DEFL = -1.490' ? 16'- 0.0' Allowed = 1.571' MAX HORIZ. LL DEFL = 0.100' ? 31'-MAX HORIZ. TL DEFL = 0.195' 9 31'-8.5' 8.5' 110 gph, h=15ft, TCDL=8.4,BCDL=3.0, ASCE 7-10, (All Heights), Enclosed, Cat.2, Exp.B, MIIIFRS(Dir), load duration factor=1.6, Truss designed for wind loads in the plane of the truss only. 16-00 4-06 16-00 2-10-08 2-10-08 2-10-08 2-10-08 2-10-08 2-10-08 2-10-08 2-10-08 4-06 > > 7-04-08 ^ • 5-09 J< 5-09 L 5-09 7-04-08 ^ > 16-00 16-00 ^ > 32-00 JOB NAUE: takaii - TAKAMI-Tl Truss: TAKAMI-T1 DES. BY: BS DATE: 5/7/2014 SEQ.: 5921211 TRANS ID: 398189 Scale: 0.2697 WARNMOS: 1. Buldar and erectton contractor stwuid be athnsed of off GeneraJ Note and VMmB^ before construction commences. 2. 2x4 compression web bracing nuist be instaled where shewn +. 3. Addifional temporary bracing to insure stabttty during construction is the rMponsib^ of tha eredor. Additional permanent bracing of ttte overal strucbire is the responsibiSty of the buiding desigrter. 4. No load should be appled to any component witl after bracing and bsteneis are comptete and at no tfene should any loads greater than design loads be applied to any component 5. CompuTrus has no control ovar ar>d assumes no responsttritty for ^ bbrication, handing, shipment and instalation of components. 6. This design is furnished subject to the limitadons set forth by TPIAATTCA in BCSI, rapies of which wi be himished upon request MiTek USA, lnc./CofnpuTrus Software +7.6.6(1L)-E GENERAL NOTES, unless otherwise noted: 1. This de^ is based only upon the parameters shown and is for an individual building component AppRcabWy of design parameters and proper incorporation of component is the responsibility of the buWtng destoner. 2. Design assumes the top and bottom chords to be lateraOy braced at 2* O.C. and at 10' o.c. respectivefy unless braced throughout their lengtti by continuous sheathing such as ;riywood $heathm(TC) and/or drywal(BC). 3. 2x Impact bridging or lateral bracing requirad where shown + + 4. instalation oftruss is the responsiNRyofthe respective contractor. 5. D»ign a»umes trusses are to be used in a non-corrosive environment, and are fpr "dry condHon' ol use. 6. Design assumes foi bearing at 9M supports shown. Shim or we(toe If rwce^ary. 7. Design assumes adequate drainage is provided. S. Plates shal be located on both foces of tnes, and placed so their center lines coincide witii joint center llnea. 9. Digits indicate size of plato in inches. 10. For basic connector ptate design vahjes see ESR-1311, ESR-1988 (MiTeIc) Illll This design prepared from computer input by PACIFIC TRUSS LUMBER SPECIFICATIONS TC: 2x4 DF #1&BTR BC: 2x4 DF #1iBTR WEBS: 2x4 DF *2 TC UTERAL SUPPORT <= 12'0C. UON. BC UTERAL SUPPORT <= 12'0C. UON. y-1x3 or equal at non-structural vertical leibers (uon). M-1.5X4 where shown; Jts:2-3,5,7,9-10 Connector plate prefix designators: C,CN,C18,CN18 (or no prefix) = CoipuTrus, Inc U,y20HS,ll18HS,U16 = HiTek HT series TRUSS SPAN 32'- 0.0" LOAD DURATION INCREASE ^ 1.25 (Non-Rep) SPACED 24.0" O.C. LOADING LL( 20.0)+0L{ 14.0) ON TOP CHORD = 34.0 PSF DL ON BOTTOM CHORD = 5.0 PSF TOTAL LOAD = 39.0 PSF LIMITED STORAGE DOES NOT APPLY DUE TO THE SPATIAL REQUIREMENTS OF CBC 2013 NOT BEING MET. BOTTOM CHORD CHECKED FOR 10PSF LIVE LOAO. TOP AND BOTTOM CHORD LIVE LOADS ACT NON-CONCURRENTLY. Refer to CompuTrus standard gable end detail for complete specifications. CBC2013/IBC2012 UAX MEMBER FORCES 4W /GDF/Cq=1.00 1 2=( -5596) 0 2 3=( -5380) 0 3 4=( -5382) 0 4 5=( -4299) 0 5 6=( -4299) -4299) 0 6 7=( -4299) -4299) 0 7 8 8=( 9=( -4299) -5382) 0 0 9 10=( 5380) 0 10 11 = ( -5596) 0 1-12=(0) 5473 12- 13=(0) 4779 13- 14=(0) 3569 14- 15=(0) 4779 15- 11=(0) 5473 2- 12=(-181) 3- 12=(-232) 12- 4=( 0) 602 4- 13=(-643) 0 5- 13=(-207) 3 13- 6=( 0) 896 6- 14=:( 0) 896 14- 7=(-207) 3 14- 8=(-643) 0 8-15=( 0) 602 15- 9=(-232) 0 15-10=(-181) 72 BEARING LOCATIONS 0'- 0.0" 32'- 0.0" MAX VERT REACTIONS 0/ 1248V 0/ 1248V BRG SIZE 3.50" 3.50" REQUIRED BRG AREA SQ.IN. (SPECIES) 2.00 DF ( 625) 2.00 DF ( 625) VERTICAL DEFLECTION LIMITS: LL=L/360, TL=L/240 MAX LL DEFL = -0.579" 9 16'- 0.0" Allowed = 1.047" MAX TL CREEP DEFL = -1.399" » 16'- 0.0" Allowed = 1.571" MAX HORIZ. LL DEFL = 0.100" 9 31' MAX HORIZ. TL DEFL = 0.194" I 31' 8.5" 8.5" Wind: 110 «ph, h=15ft, TCDL=8.4,BC0L=3.0, ASCE 7-10, (All Heights), Enclosed, Cat.2, Exp.B, MWFRS(Oir), load duration factor=1.6, Truss designed for wind loads in the plane of the truss only. 16-00 16-00 4-00-13 3-03-11 2-10-08 2-10-08 2-10-08 2-10-08 2-10-08 2-10-08 3-03-11 4-00-13 it g~ ~' |M-3X12 12 M-3x8 > 13 M-3X8 I M-5x12(S) 14 111-3x8 L 15 M-3x8 1, M-3x12| L 7-04-08 5-09 5-09 5-09 7-04-08 ^ I > 16-00 16-00 7' . > 32-00 JOB NAME: takaii - TAKAMI-TlA Scale: 0.2669 Truss: TAKAMI-T1A DES. BY: BS DATE: 5/7/2014 SEQ.: 5921210 TRANS ID: 398189 lllllllll WARNINGS: 1. Bulder and erection contractor should be advised of al General Notes and VMrnings before construction commences. 2. 2x4 otmpresston web bracing must be insteled where shown +. 3. Addlion^temporary bradng to ir»urestabilty during construction is the responsibiflty of the erector. Addifional permanent bracing of flw overal structitre is the responstbAity of the buiding designer. 4. No load should be appled to any component unti after al bradng and testeners are complete and at no time should any loads greater tfian design lo«ts tw applied to any corr^wnent 5. CompuTrus tas no contrcH over and assumes no responsibSty for the ^brication, hantUng, shipment and Instalation of componente. 6. This design is fomished subject to the Imttations set forth by TPl/WTCA in BCSI, copies of which wi be furnished upon request MiTek USA, lnc./CompuTrus Soflwai^ +7.6.6(1 L)-E GENERAL NOTES, untess othefwise noted. 1. This design is t>ased only upon the parameters shown and is for an individual buiU^ comporwnt AppKcabiKty of design parameters and proper incorporation of component is the responseility of the building designer. 2. Oesgn assumes the top and bottom chonte to be lateraly braced at 2* o.c. and at 10* o.c. respectivety untess braced ttvoughoutttwir ten^ by continuous sheathing such as [^ywood sheafiiing(TC} and/or drywal^). 3. 2x Impact bridgir^ or lateral bracing required where shown + * 4. Instalation of truss is the responsbKy of ttw respective contractor. 5. Design assumes trusses are to be used in a non-corrosive environment, and are for 'dry condition" of use. 6. Design assumes ton bearing at aH supports shown. Shim or wedge if necwsary. 7. Design assumes adequate drainage Is provided. 8. Platasshaf be located on both teces of truss, and placed so meir center lines coincide with pint center Unes. 9. Digits indicate Size of plate in inches. 10. For basic connector plate design values see ESR-1311, ESR-19S8 (MtTeIc} Pacific Southwest Biological Services,Inc. P.O. Box 985, National City, California 91951-0985 • (619) 477-5333 • FAX (619) 477-5380 Kyle Van Buskirk 19 June 2014 145 Bent Avenue PSBS # W357 San Marcos CA 92078 760 471 1212 X 1660 RE: Carlsbad - APN 215-232-01, 2233 Pamplona Biological Letter Dear Mr. Van Buskirk: This correspondence is in response to a request to the owner by the City of Carlsbad to provide a biological letter as part of your project processing of the residential project at 2233 Pamplona Way, Carlsbad, California. 1 made a site survey of the parcel on 18 June 2014 at 11AM. The site, located at the northwestern corner of Pamplona and Alicante, had some limited clearing and deposition of a few cubic yards of fill. Surrounding areas are landscaped, suburban residential parcels. The vegetation on the eastern cut slope was an erosion control mixture of native scrub elements that, in a natural and more extensive area, would constitute Diegan Coastal Sage Scrub. The habitat, however is the result of erosion control seeding and is not a native habitat. The shrubs had been pruned back. The south-facing, larger cut slope at the back of the parcel has a planting of exotic shrubs and succulents. It appears that the adjacent neighbor to the north has been using this area of planting of some fruit trees and sugar cane on the upper portion of the slope. A major growth of Pampas Grass occurs at the base of the slope as well as massive Century (Agave) plants. It is my opinion that the parcel, the result of grading for the original subdivision, did and does not have any intact native vegetation since its creation as a legal parcel. It would be considered as Disturbed Habitat for the purpose of any Habitat Loss calculations. Sincerely, R. Mitchel Beauchamp, M.Sc, President RECORD COPY evans,GOlbaugli& assoc., inc. 1565 creek street • suite 107 san marcos, California 92078 (760) 510-9686 fax 510-9685 February 28, 2014 D J Construction 2436 Glenridge Road Escondido, CA 92027 Attention: Mr. Don Johnson EGA 14-04-01 Subject: Limited Geotechnical Investigation, 2233 Pamplona Way, Carlsbad, California. Lot 195, Tract 5781, APN 215-232-01 References: 1) Site Plan, Undated 2) 3) Dear Mr. Johnson, "Landslide Hazards in the Encinitas Quadrangle, San Diego County, Califomia", Dated 1986, By Califomia Division of Mines and Geology "Final Report of Compacted Fill Ground, Lots 148 to 169,171, 174to 179, 182-195, 206 to 224,227, Culvert and Headwall, La Costa Valley Unit 4, San Diego Coimty, Califomia", By Benton Engineering, Inc, Dated December 16, 1966 RECEIVED APR 0 9 ZOH This letter report presents the results of our geotechnical investigation 6^TfteQ&)£(|P^^^^f^ property to accommodate the constmction of a "manufactured" single family rt^bMJfe^^tfioiON detached garage. Background The subject property is located at 2233 Pamplona Way in the La Costa area of the City of Carlsbad, Califomia. The lot was developed in the late 1960's (Reference 3) as part of the master La Costa Valley Unit No. 4 and occupies Lot 195. The lot is roughly rectangular in shape and consists of a relatively level pad at the northeast comer of the intersection of Alicante Road and Pamplona Way There is a variable height ascending slope from the pad up to Alicante Road to the east and Lot 224 to the north. The slope daylights along Pamplona Way and increases in height to roughly 18 feet below Lot 224 The gradient of the slope is roughly 1.5:1. We imderstand that the lot has been undeveloped since the time of the mass grading of the Tract. geotechnical engineering D J Constmction ECA 14-04-01 Febmary 28, 2014 Page 2 The site is currently vacant with a sparse growth of grasses and weeds on the pad and the east slope which ascends to Alicante Road. There is a heavy growth of large succulent plants, (i.e., cactus, etc) on the northem slope with scattered palm and other trees. There is also a growth of phreatophyte type plants along the base of the westem portion of this slope. Review of Reference 3 (Benton) indicates that the lot was graded with a cut/fill transition across the lot in a roughly north/south direction. The westem, roughly three-quarters of the site is shown as a planned cut underlain by in-place sandstone assigned to the Scripps Formation. The remaining eastem portion of the site is shown as imderlain by fill derived from this (and other) formations and consists predominantly of clayey sand. The majority of the ascending slopes are fill slopes constmcted with this material. The westem portion of the northem slope is shown as a cut into the formation material. The referenced report (3) is silent as to how the transition from cut to fill was dealt with, if at all. As discussed below, the findings from our subsurface exploration indicate that there is less fill on the site than that shown on the site plan included in Reference 3. Proposed Residence/Improvements Based on our discussions with you and review of the enclosed site plan, we understand that the proposed constmction will consist of developing a level building pad to accommodate a manufactured home with a detached garage. We imderstand that the manufactured home will have a raised floor with a perimeter concrete foundation and isolated interior pier footings. The detached garage will have a conventional concrete slab-on-grade/foundation system. Scope of Work Based on the above information we performed the following scope of work which we felt was necessary to properly characterize the site from a geotechnical perspective and to be able to make the appropriate recommendations for the design and constraction of the proposed stracture and appurtenances. * Review of the above referenced plans/reports and in-house documents * Subsurface exploration on Febmary 26,2014 consisting of 4 test pits excavated with a backhoe. The pits ranged in depth from roughly 2 to 3 feet and were logged by our project engineer. In-place and bulk samples of the soil/rock materials encountered were retrieved for laboratory testing. D J Constmction ECA 14-04-01 Febraary 28,2014 Page 3 * Laboratory testing of the soil/rock samples retrieved to establish the characteristics of the soil materials pertinent to the design/constraction of the improvements. The testing included: in-place moisture density, consolidation, grain size analyses and shear strength. * Stability analyses of the ascending perimeter fill slopes. * Review and analyses of the findings. * Determination of the near source seismic factors per the current Califomia Building Code * Engineering analyses and formulation of design recommendations for the foundation elements. * Preparation of this report. Findings Surface Features The most significant surface features from a geotechnical engineering perspective are the vegetation cover on the north slope and a relatively shallow surface soil flow/slump along the southem portion of the eastern slope. As discussed above, the vegetation on the northem slope consists of a growth of large cacti and other succulent/water absorbing type plants. This is a mature growth of plants that appears to have thrived without the benefit of landscape irrigation. Extreme care should be taken if it is desired to remove any/all of these plants. The root systems of these plants have provided, at the very least, a stabilizing effect to the surficial stability of the slope. Removal of any of these plants/root systems may destabilize localized areas of the near surface slope soils. There is a relatively shallow soil flow/slump along the southern portion of the eastem slope along Alicante Road. The slump is roughly 12 inches deep and roughly 10 feet wide. It does not appear that this slope has been maintained with landscape/irrigation since the time of initial constraction (i.e., 1966). That said, although the slope has performed relatively well in the past 48 years, this area of the slppe should be repaired as discussed below. D J Constraction ECA 14-04-01 Febraary 28,2014 Page 4 Subsurface Conditions: Engineered Fill (Ef). The engineered fill placed as part of the mass tract development circa 1966 appears to be limited to the constraction of the eastern slope which ascends to Alicante Road and the eastem, roughly one-half of the northern slope which ascends to Lot 224. These soils consist predominantly of clayey sands which are damp to moist and medium dense where encountered. The descriptive terms of this material is presented on the enclosed logs of the test pits. Plates 2.1 through 2.4. The estimated limits of this material is shown on the enclosed Plate 1 - Geotechnical Map. Scripps Formation (Tsc). As discussed above, essentially the entire level portion of the lot is cut into the underlying formation materials. The upper, roughly 8-inches of this material is very weathered. The remaining portions of this material encountered is medium dense to dense with depth. The in-place formational material encountered consists predominantiy of sandstone (i.e., sand) which is dense and damp to moist where encountered. Landslides: There are no known deep seated landslides in the immediate vicinity of the subject site, nor were any detected during our investigation. Minor sloughing of the near surface soils on the eastem slope were observed as discussed above. Ground Water: Ground water, as a zone of free water was not encountered in any of our exploratory excavations. Seismic Design Considerations: In accordance with Section 1613A.5.5.1 of the 2010 CBC, the Site Classified is defined as "D" (stiff soil profile). The following seismic design parameters are based on the results of our interpretation of the noted charts and figures in the 2010 Califomia Building Code (based on the 2009 International Building Code) and ASCE/SEI 7-05. Additionally, the computer program Seismic Hazard Curves and Uniform Response Spectra Version 5.1.0 by the United States Geological Survey (USGS 2007) was utilized to refine the parameters. Site Classification: D Table 1613.5.2 Short Period (0.2 sec) Spectral Acceleration (Ss) 1.057 Eq 16A-36 1.0 second Period Spectral Acceleration (S1) 0.408 Eq 16A-37 Long Period Transition Period 8 Fig. 22-15 (ASCE-7) Short Period (0.2 sec) - SMs 1.139 1.0 second Period - SMI 0.650 D J Constmction ECA 14-04-01 Febmary 28, 2014 Page 5 Due to the dense condition of the bedrock that underlies the site, liquefaction is not considered to be a factor in the design of the proposed improvements. Slope Stabilitv: Utilizing the ultimate shear strength parameters for the existing fill and peak parameters for the underlying bedrock as tested in our laboratory and the program GSTABL7 developed by Gregory Geotechnical Software, deep seated/global stability analyses was performed for a maximum height of an existing fill slope of 20 feet with a gradient of one and one-half to one horizontal to one vertical (1.5:1). The resulting static factor of safety is 2.1 for this configuration. The graphical output plot and output files are attached as Appendix B. While the deep seated stability is not considered to be a factor in the design of the proposed improvements, the surficial stability of the ascending perimeter fill slopes is an issue of interest from a geotechnical perspective. As discussed above, there is a minor soil flow/slump feature along the southem portion of the eastem slope. It is believed that this feature is the result of weathering of the near surface fill soils and episodes of heavy rain events over the years. While this is not a large feature, it needs to be addressed in the form of a repair to avoid enlargement of this feature both horizontally and vertically. Fortunately, in this area there is a paved sidewalk and street (Alicante) above this slope which does not allow for any build up of water that would lead to a deep saturation of the near surface slope soils. The heavily vegetated state of the northem slope has, most likely, helped in preventing distress to the near surface slope soils. Included at the end of Appendix B is a calculation sheet for surficial slope stability. The analyses indicate that at a depth of 2.5 feet of saturation the factor of safety against surficial stability is on the order of 1.5. As discussed above it is not likely that the eastem slope will ever experience that depth of saturation due to the paved surfaces immediately above the top of this slope and the heavy vegetation on the northern slope would tend to prevent this type of saturation depth as well. CONCLUSIONS The subject site is considered suitable for it's intended use from a geotechnical perspective provided the recommendations presented herein are incorporated into the design and constraction phases of the proposed development. D J Constraction ECA 14-04-01 Febraary 28,2014 Page 6 RECOMMENDATIONS The following recommendations are based on our review of the referenced plans/reports, observations, findings from our subsurface investigative work and results of our laboratory testing. Foundation Design: Based on our experience with similar soils and the reactions to the samples tested to loading/water innundation, the formational materials underlying the site are classified as exhibiting a very low expansion potential. We underst£ind that the proposed residence stracture will have a raised floor beneath the entire envelope and the detached garage will be a conventional concrete slab-on-grade foimdation system.. Therefore, we recommend the following provisions be incorporated into the design of the foundation elements. Soil Bearing Pressure. We recommend an allowable soil bearing pressure of 2,000 pounds per square foot (psf) for continuous footings at least 12 inches wide and 12-inches deep and for isolated/pier footing that are at least 18-inches square and embedded at least 12-inches. A one third increase for short term wind or seismic loads is allowed. Lateral loads against the stracture may be resisted by friction between the footing bases and the supporting soil. Footing Design. Exterior footings should be at least 12 inches deep and reinforced with two No. 4 deformed steel reinforcing bars, one near the top and one near the bottom. All interior footings should have an embedment depth of at least 12 inches. Differential foundation settlements could, conceivably, be on the order of Vi -inch within the building pad. Slabs-on-Grade. Although the residence will have a raised floor, there will be other slabs- on-grade associated with the driveway/garage, and other hardscape features. The driveway/garage slabs-on-grade should be at least 4 inches thick and be reinforced with No. 4 deformed steel reinforcing bars 18 inches on center each way. The reinforcing bars should be positioned at the mid-height of the slab and be maintained during concrete placement. The slabs-on-grade should be underlain at least four inches of clean moist sand. D J Constraction ECA 14-04-01 Febraary 28, 2014 Page 7 If desired, the garage slab can be underlain by 10 mil plastic sheeting to provide a moisture vapor barrier. If this is desired, the sheeting should be placed with at least one-inch of sand above the sheeting. There should be at least two inches of clean moist sand or gravel beneath the plastic sheeting. The intent of the sand and plastic sheeting beneath the slabs-on-grade is to provide a capillary break for any moisture that may migrate beneath the slab. It is not intended as a waterproofing system. If a waterproof system is desired, other design professionals will need to be consulted for recommendations. Presoaking. A thorough wetting of the exposed subgrade soils should be performed immediately prior to the placement of the slab-on-grade underlayment elements (i.e., clean sand and plastic sheeting). Cement Type. From a geotechnical perspective. Type II cement may be utilized for all concrete in contact with the subgrade soil provided that all provisions of ACI 318, Section 4.2 pertaining to water-cement ratio are satisfied. Retaining Walls: We are not aware of any plans for retaining walls as part of the proposed improvements. Exterior Concrete Flatwork. Concrete flatwork should be divided into as nearly square panels as possible. Frequent joints should be provided to give articulation to the concrete panels. Landscaping and planters adjacent to concrete flatwork should be designed in such a maimer as to direct drainage away from concrete areas to approved outlets. The subgrade soils should be pre-moistened prior to placing concrete. Patios and walkways should have a 4-inch minimum thickness and be reinforced with No. 3 reinforcing bars spaced 18 inches on center, each way, placed and maintained at mid height through the concrete placement. Surface Drainage. The performance of foundations is partly dependent upon maintaining adequate surface drainage both during and after constraction. The ground surface around stractures should be graded so the surface water will be carried quickly away from the building without ponding. The minimum gradient within five feet of the building v^ll depend upon surface landscaping and hardscape. D J Constraction ECA 14-04-01 Febraary 28, 2014 Page 8 In general, we suggest that paved and landscaped areas have a minimum gradient of two percent. Planters should be constmcted so that moisture is not allowed to seep into foundation areas or beneath slabs and pavements. Landscaping: The impact of heavy irrigation can artificially raise existing ground water tables or create perched water conditions. This may result in seepage or shallow ground water conditions where previously none existed. It appears as though the eastem slope of the subject property has either never been subjected to landscape irrigation or at least not for a long period of time. Subsequent to the repairs as discussed below, consultation with a qualified landscape architect should be considered if there are any plans for landscaping any portion of this or the northem slope in the future. Earthwork: In general, all significant earthwork operations should be performed under the observation and testing of a qualified geotechnical engineer. We understand that the current plans call for predominantiy cut into the formational soil/rock and very little, if any fill is plaimed. Slope Repair: As discussed above there is an existing remnant of a soil flow/slump along the southem portion of the eastem slope below Alicante Road. For continuity, this area should be repaired to the pre-existing slope configuration. The appropriate repair for this section of slope vsall be to over- excavate the exposed soils and reconstract the slope in a maimer such that it will be overbuilt and trimmed back to a firm surface. The details of this type of repair are presented on the enclosed Plate 3 - Slope Repair Details. This work will require the observation and testing of a qualified geotechnical engineer. All fill soils related to this work should be moisture conditioned to achieve at or above optimum moisture conditions, placed in lose lifts, roughly 6 to 8-inches in thickness and be mechanically compacted to 90 percent relative compaction based on ASTM Test Method D 1557. D J Constraction Febraary 28, 2014 ECA 14-04-01 Page 9 LIMITATIONS Geotechnical engineering is an inexact science and conditions encountered during our subsurface exploration program have been extrapolated between exploratory points. Subsurface conditions are not homogenous and our assumptions may not be accurate. The actual conditions will not be known until the excavations for the development are undertaken. This report has been prepared for your exclusive use in developing the property in accordance with currently accepted geotechnical engineering practice. No warranty, expressed or implied is made. Respectfully submitted, Evans, Colbaugh & Associates, E. David Colbaugh, M.Sc, PE, GE President Principal Geotechnical Engineer, GE 228 Distribution: (4) Addressee Enclosures: Plate 1 - Plate 2.1 through 2.4 Plate 3 - Geotechnical Map Log of Test Pit Slope Repair Details Appendix A - Supporting Data and Procedures Plate A-1 Consolidation Test Data Plate A-2 Grain Size Distribution Plates A-3.1 and 3.2 Direct Shear Test Results Appendix B Slope Stability Analyses Log of Test Pit TP-1 Date Excavated: Logged By: _ 2/26/14 EDC Elevation: Pit Dimensions (Feet): 8'Lx2'Wx2.5'D With: Backhoe Sample Type o Depth (feet) Sample Type Dry Densit (pcf) Moistui Conten Other Tests uses Graphi Log Description LB D 99 SP * SP FELL (Af)/COLLUVIUM (Qcol): SAND (SP), loose, diy, light brown SCRIPPS FORMATION (Tsc), SANDSTONE, SAND (SP), weathered in upper rougly 12", medium dense to dense, dty to damp, light brown to light red brown Total Depth=2.5', No groundwater Please Note Limitations Discussed orEjS^lanation of Logs" evans, colbaugh & assoc. inc. Date: February 2014 Project No.: 14-04-01 LOG OF TEST PIT TP-1 2233 Pamplona Way Plate 2.1 1 of 1 Log of Test Pit TP-2 Date Excavated: Logged By: 2/26/14 EDC Elevation: Pit Dimensions (Feet): 5'Lx2'Wx2.5'D With: Backhoe unple [•ype >1 tUjj u Depth (feet) unple [•ype Dry nsit pcf) LStUl nten ther ests OT 0 OT (—1 aphi Log Description Depth (feet) 0) — Q 1—' u 0 D 99 9 SP «- - FILL(Af)/COLLUVIUM (Qcol), SAND (SP), loose, dry to damp, light brown SP SCRIPPS FORMATION (Tsc), SANDSTONE, SAND (SP), Weathered in upper roughly 12", medium dense to dense, dry to damp, light yellow brown. Total Depth=2.5', No Groundwater Please Note Limitations Discussed orESfplanation of Logs" evans, colbaugh & assoc. inc. Date: February 2014 Project No.: 14-04-01 LOG OF TEST PIT TP-2 2233 Pamplona Way Plate 2.2 1 of 1 Log of Test Pit TP-4 Date Excavated; Logged By: _ 2/26/14 EDC Elevation: Pit Dimensions (Feet): 5'Lx2'Wx3'D With: Backhoe 0) M OJ (dEH m 4-) — >i-HM-l M W U Q c a Q o8 M to 0)4-1 XI to 4J 0) U •H ao M o Description LB - 2- SC FILL (Af): CLAYEY SAND(SC) TO SANDY CLAY(CL) in eastern portion of pit (into slope), medium dense, dry to damp, olive grat. 1. D D 87 90 13 12 SP SCRIPPS FORMATION (Tsc) SANDSTONE: SAND (SP), dense, dry to damp, light yellow brown. Total Depth=3.0', No Groundwater Please Note Limitations Discussed onEjfplanation of Logs" evans, colbaugh & assoc. inc. Date: February 2014 Project No.: 14-04-01 LOG OF TEST PIT TP-4 2233 Pamplona Way Plate 2.4 1 of 1 Sheet of Alicante Road Soil Flow/Slump • Tsc Ef Over-Build and Trim Back Over-Excavate and Replace as Compacted Fill evans, colbaugh & assoc inc Prepared by Reviewed by •ate ^^"^'^ Project. •ate Subject. Plate 3 Project No. \ 2233 Pamplona Way Slope Repair Detail APPENDIX A SUPPORTING DATA and PROCEDURES APPENDIX A SUPPORTING. DATA. PROCEDURES AND ANALYSIS LABORATORY TESTING General. The following sections describe the procedures for laboratory tests commonly performed by Evans, Colbaugh & Associates, Inc. on soil and rock samples obtained during the exploratory phase of our investigation. The selection of certain samples for laboratory testing is based primarily on engineering judgement, and all laboratory tests described below have not necessarily been performed on every sample obtained. Moisture-Density. Field moisture content and in-place density were determined for each sample of undisturbed soil material obtained. The field moisture content is determined according to ASTM Test Method D 2216-98 by obtaining one-half the moisture sample from each end of the tube. The in-place dry density of the sample is determined by using the net weight of the entire sample. At the same time the field moisture content and in-place density are determined, the soil material at each end of the sleeve is classified according to the Unified Soil Classification System and pocket penetrometer readings are made in the cohesive samples. The results of the field moisture content and in-place density determinations are presented on the logs (Plates 2.1 through 2.4). Consolidation/Expansion Test. The one-dimensional consolidation/expansion of in-place samples of on-site soil/rock was evaluated. The procedure basically consists of performing a loaded swell test on a sample one inch high and 2.625 inches in diameter. Several samples of the underlying fill and colluvial soils were tested to determine the expansion/consolidation potential when inundated with water. The samples were chosen from various depths and normal loads were applied and allowed to stabilize prior to inundation. The results of this test are presented in graphical from as Plates A-1 Grain Size Distribution. As part of the engineering classification of the on-site soils, samples of the two major soil types (i.e., fill and sandstone) were tested to determine the distribution of particle size. The distribution was determined in general accordance with ASTM Test Method D 422. Particle size is first detennined by a wash sieving procedure using U S Standard Sieve Size Nos. 3.4,4,10,20,40, 60, 100 and 200. The test results are summarized on Plate A-2 Direct Shear Test. Direct shear tests were performed on relatively undisturbed samples of the fill soil and formational soil/rock to obtain the drained peak and ultimate strength. The tests were performed on cylindrical samples having a diameter of 2.625 inches and a height of one inch. Prior to testing the samples are soaked in the consolidometer under the same normal stress to be employed during the test to allow the sample to expand or consolidate and reach equilibrium imder load. Soaking periods were at least one day. After consolidation, the sample is placed in the direct shear box, the normal stress is reapplied through a loading frame and lever system, and the sample is submerged. Prior to testing, cohesive samples are allowed to restablize. Vertical movement is monitored electronically by a digital dial indicator. The samples were sheared at a strain rate of 0.01 to 0.005 inches per minute. The shearing force is measured by means of an electronic load cell. Horizontal displacement of the sample is monitored electronically by a digital dial indicator. Shear force, normal force, and vertical movement of the sample are all automatically recorded by computer link and stored in a unique data file. For peak and ultimate strength, each sample is sheared to a displacement of approximately one-half inch. The results of the direct shear tests are presented on Plate A-3.1 and 3.2 oOo 100 1,000 STRESS (psf) 10, Line Symbol Line Symbol Location, Depth, Ft. TP-2,2 Sample Type uses Group Symbol Moisture Content, % 9 Dry Density, Pcf. 101 Liquid Limit, % Plasticity Index, % Fines, % Water Added At, Psf. 1000 evans, colbaugh & assoc. inc. Date: Job No. 14-04-01 CONSOLIDATION/EXPANSION TEST DATA 2233 Pamplona Way Plate A-1 GRAVEL SAND SILT OR CLAY COARSE FINE CQVSE1 MEDIUM FINE SILT OR CLAY STANDARD SIEVE OPENING U.S. STANDARD SIEVE NUMBER HYDROMETER 100 3" 1 1/2" 3/4" 3/8 20 40 60 100 200 90 80 70 60 50 o ? >- GO OC BI z H 40 UJ U CC Ul o. 30 20 10 T .01 .005 50.0 0.1 .05 GRAIN SIZE (millimeters) .001 SYMBOL SAMPLE NUMBER SAMPLE DEPTH (feet) SOIL DESCRIPTION . TP- I O-T- TP- 4-G- 2 evans, colbaugh_&_assoc^_inc^ GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION DATA Job Number |4-o4-Qt Plate ^'^ 33 3 (D (D ri' ^ 5 Q) < T (D (D a a a cr • • 0) Q) ct CD ct (D 0 cn c 0" O)' n rt "D -) 0 CD' n rt r • es 1 P 0 rt Z O r 1 T r< 0 0 ^)==^/..^<. ^^-LS.S <S^^3^e'sF (n T CD (D rt D CD < CD $ CD a 1 > "1} ? T CD "D Q) s CD a 0" (J • • 0) 0) ST <^ CD (B 0 m "0 C -i U 0 CD' (D' n n rt rt V rt Z 0 r. 1 s a) i. I _ 0 t 0 1 T C/) T CD CD rt Six i CV^5t^> APPENDIX B Slope Stability Analyses 50 2233 Pamplona Way Existing Fill Slope Stability n:\_2014\14-04-01\1404.pl2 Run By: Evans, Colbaugh & Associates, Inc 3/1/2014 06:39AM # FS a 2.110 b 2.135 c 2.147 d 2.147 e 2.152 f 2.169 g 2.172 h 2.172 i 2.176 j Soil Soil Total Desc. Type UnitWt. No, (pcf) 1 1 115.0 2 2 110.0 Saturated Cohesion Friction UnitWt. Intercept Angle (pcf) (psf) (deg) 115.0 300.0 28.5 112.0 270.0 27.0 Pore Pressure Piez. Pressure Constant Surface Param. (psf) No. 0.00 0.0 0 0.00 0.0 0 GSTABL7i GSTABL7V.2 FSmin=2.110 Safety Factors Are Calculated By The Modified Bishop Method PROFIL N:\_2014\14-04-01\1404.in Version G7v2.004 [GSTABL72.EXE] 2233 Pamplona Way Existing Fill Slope Stability 4 3 0. 10. 20. 10. 1 20. 10. 50. 30. 2 50. 30. 70. 30. 2 20. 10. 70. 10. 1 0. 0. 0. SOIL 1 2 2 115. 115. 300. 28.5 0. 0. 0 110. 112. 270. 27. 0. 0. 0 CIRCL2 10 20 10. 20. 50. 60. 0. 5. 0. 0. N:\_2014\14-04-01\1404.OUT Page 1 *** GSTABL7 *** ** GSTABL7 by Garry H. Gregory, P.E. ** ** Original Version 1.0, January 1996; Current Version 2.005, Sept. (All Rights Reserved-Unauthorized Use Prohibited) 2006 SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS SYSTEM Modified Bishop, Simplified Janbu, or GLE Method of Slices. (Includes Spencer & Morgenstern-Price Type Analysis) Including Pier/Pile, Reinforcement, Soil Nail, Tieback, Nonlinear Undrained Shear Strength, Curved Phi Envelope, Anisotropic Soil, Fiber-Reinforced Soil, Boundary Loads, Water Surfaces, Pseudo-Static & Newmark Earthquake, and Applied Forces. Analysis Run Date: Time of Run: Run By: Input Data Filename: Output Filename: Unit System: Plotted Output Filename: 3/1/2014 06:39AM Evans, Colbaugh & Associates, Inc N:\_2014\14-04-01\14 04.in N:\_2014\14-04-01\14 04.OUT English N:\ 2014\14-04-01\1404.PLT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: BOUNDARY COORDINATES 3 Top Boundaries 4 Total Boundaries Boundary X-Left Y-Left No. (ft) (ft) 1 0.00 10.00 2 20.00 10.00 3 50.00 30.00 4 20.00 10.00 Default Y-Origin = 0.00 (ft) Default X-Plus Value = 0.00(ft) Default Y-Plus Value = 0.00 (ft) ISOTROPIC SOIL PARAMETERS 2 Type(s) of Soil Soil Total Saturated 2233 Pamplona Way Existing Fill Slope Stability X-Right (ft) 20. 00 50.00 70.00 70. 00 Y-Right (ft) 10. 00 30.00 30.00 10.00 Soil Type Below Bnd 1 2 2 1 Cohesion Friction Pore Pressure Piez. Type Unit Wt. No. (pcf) 1 115.0 2 110.0 Unit Wt. Intercept Angle (deg) 28.5 27.0 Pressure Constant Surface Param. 0.00 0.00 (psf) 0.0 0.0 No. 0 0 (pcf) (psf) 115.0 300.0 112.0 270.0 A Critical Failure Surface Searching Method, Using A Random Technique For Generating Circular Surfaces, Has Been Specified. 200 Trial Surfaces Have Been Generated. 20 Surface(s) Initiate(s) From Each Of 10 Points Equally Spaced Along The Ground Surface Between X = 10. 00 (ft) and X = 20.00(ft) Each Surface Terminates Between X = 50.00(ft) and X = 60.00(ft) Unless Further Limitations Were Imposed, The Minimum Elevation At Which A Surface Extends Is Y = 0.00(ft) 5.00(ft) Line Segments Define Each Trial Failure Surface. Following Are Displayed The Ten Most Critical Of The Trial Failure Surfaces Evaluated. They Are Ordered - Most Critical First. * * Safety Factors Are Calculated By The Modified Bishop Method * ' Total Number of Trial Surfaces Attempted = 200 Number of Trial Surfaces With Valid FS = 200 Statistical Data On All Valid FS Values: FS Max = 2.723 FS Min = 2.110 FS Ave = 2.394 Standard Deviation = 0.145 Coefficient of Variation = 6. Failure Surface Specified By 11 Coordinate Points Point X-Surf Y-Surf No. (ft) (ft) 1 18.889 10.000 2 23.855 9.422 3 28.854 9.514 07 N:\_2014\14-04-01\1404.OUT Page 2 4 33.796 10.276 5 38.591 11.694 6 43.152 13.742 7 47.398 16.382 8 51.252 19.568 9 54.644 23.242 10 57.512 27.337 11 58.887 30.000 Circle Center At X = 25.666 ; Y = 4 6.592 ; and Radius = 37.214 Factor of Safety *** 2.110' *** Individual data on the 13 slices Water Water Tie Tie Earthquake Force Force Force Force Force Surcharge Slice Width Weight Top Bot Norm Tan Hor Ver Load No. (ft) (lbs) (lbs) (lbs) (lbs) (lbs) (lbs) (lbs) (lbs) 1 1 1 8. 3 0. 0 0 0 0. 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 9 701. 9 0. 0 0 0 0. 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 5 0 2635. 5 0. 0 0 0 0. 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 3 1 2496. 2 0. 0 0 0 0. 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 8 1668. 6 0. 0 0 0 0. 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 4 8 5174 . 3 0. 0 0 0 0. 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 4 6 5618. 1 0. 0 0 0 0. 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 4 2 5505. 7 0. 0 0 0 0. 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 2 6 3341. 3 0. 0 0 0 0. 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 1 3 1507 . 8 0. 0 0 0 0. 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 3. 4 3206. 7 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 2. 9 1486. 4 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 1. 4 201. 4 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0. 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 Failure Surface Specified By 11 Coordinate Points Point X-Surf Y-Surf No. (ft) (ft) 1 18 .889 10. 000 2 23 . 820 9. 173 3 28 819 9. 063 4 33 781 9. 674 5 38 604 10. 993 6 43 187 12. 991 7 47 435 15. 629 8 51 259 18. 850 9 54 580 22. 588 10 57 329 26. 764 11 58 843 30. 000 Circle Center At X = 27.076 ; ^ Factor of Safety 43.681 ; and Radius = 34.662 *** 2.135 *** Failure Surface Specified By 11 Coordinate Points Point X-Surf Y-Surf No. (ft) (ft) 1 17 778 10. 000 2 22 702 9. 133 3 27 699 8. 954 4 32 672 9. 469 5 37 527 10. 666 6 42 169 12. 523 7 46 510 15. 004 8 50 466 18. 062 9 53 962 21. 637 10 56 929 25. 661 11 59 281 30. 000 Circle Center At X = 26.483 Factor of Safety 45.006 ; and Radius = 36.072 *** 2.147 *** Failure Surface Specified By 12 Coordinate Points Point X-Surf Y-Surf No. (ft) (ft) 1 16.667 10.000 N:\_2014\14-04-01\1404.OUT Page 3 2 21 . 615 9. 280 3 26 . 614 9. 197 4 31 583 9. 753 5 36 441 10. 938 6 41 107 12. 732 7 45 507 15. 107 8 49 568 18. 024 9 53 224 21. 435 10 56 415 25. 285 11 59 088 29. 510 12 59 317 30. 000 Circle Center At X = 24 770 ; Y Factor of Safety 48.195 ; and Radius = 39.045 *** 2147 *** Failure Surface Specified By 11 Coordinate Points Point X-Surf Y-Surf No. (ft) (ft) 1 16 . 667 10 000 2 21 575 9. 049 3 26 570 8. 814 4 31 546 9. 302 5 36 400 10. 502 6 41 030 12. 389 7 45 340 14. 923 8 49 240 18. 052 9 52 649 21. 710 10 55. 495 25. 822 11 57 569 30. 000 Circle Center At X = 25.689 ; Y Factor of Safety 43.413 ; and Radius = 34.609 * * * 2 152 * * it- Failure Surface Specified By 12 Coordinate Points Point X-Surf Y-Surf No. (ft) (ft) 1 16 . 667 10.000 2 21 . 564 8. 992 3 26 .553 8.665 4 31 540 9.024 5 36 431 10.063 6 41 133 11.763 7 45 559 14.091 8 49 623 17.003 9 53 250 20.444 10 56 372 24.350 11 58. 928 28.647 12 59. 499 30.000 Circle Center At X = 26.448 ; Y Factor of Safety 44.918 ; and Radius = 36.262 *** 2.169 *** Failure Surface Specified By 11 Coordinate Points Point X-Surf Y-Surf No. (ft) (ft) 1 15 .556 10. 000 2 20 457 9. Oil 3 25 450 8. 750 4 30 427 9. 224 5 35 282 10. 421 6 39 909 12. 317 7 44 208 14. 869 8 48 087 18. 024 9 51 4 62 21. 713 10 54 261 25. 857 11 56 247 30. 000 Circle Center At X = 24.723 ; Y Factor of Safety 42.789 ; and Radius = 34.046 *** 2.172 *** Failure Surface Specified By 11 Coordinate Points N:\ 2014\14-04-01\1404.OUT Page 4 Point No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 <-Surf (ft) 20.000 24.897 29.891 34.863 39.696 44 .273 48.486 52.235 55.432 57.999 59.333 Y-Surf (ft) 10.000 8. 992 8.748 9.275 10.560 12.572 15.264 18.572 22.417 26.708 30.000 28.970 ; Y Circle Center At X = 28.970 ; Y = 41.164 ; Factor of Safety *** 2.172 *** Failure Surface Specified By 12 Coordinate Points and Radius 32.429 Point X-Surf Y-Surf No. (ft) (ft) 1 15 556 10.000 2 20 470 9.077 3 25 461 8.788 4 30 449 9.139 5 35 351 10.125 6 40 087 11.727 7 44 580 13.922 8 48 756 16.672 9 52 546 19.932 10 55 889 23.650 11 58 731 27.764 12 59 884 30.000 Circle Center At X = 25.228 ; Factor of Safety Y = 47.686 ; and Radius 38.908 *** 2.176 *** Failure Surface Specified By 11 Coordinate Points Point X-Surf Y-Surf No. (ft) (ft) 1 18 889 10.000 2 23 752 8.839 3 28 744 8.557 4 33 707 9.163 5 38 485 10.637 6 42 926 12.934 7 46 890 15. 981 8 50 253 19.682 9 52 907 23.919 10 54 770 28.559 11 55 067 30.000 Circle Center At X = 27.830 ; -b Factor of Safety 36.67 9 ; and Radius 28.137 2.177 *** **** END OF GSTABL7 OUTPUT INFINITE SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS K = SEISMIC COEFFICIENT ru = PORE PRESSURE RATIO p = (c/yd) sec'^+ [(1-ru) coso<- Ksin cx] tan jzf sin=^+ Kcosoc AFTER HUANG Stabilitv Analysis of Earth Slopes 1 d feet a z.s 2 dw feet z ?.s 3 <=><. degrees 4 y pcf V\o L\ ^ 5 C psf 6 ^ degrees -21 1.1 7 Seismic Coefficient - o ^ - o ~ - ~ A Factor of Safety INFINITE SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS JOBNUMBER |4-OA-Ol PLATE CITY OF CERTIFICATION OF SCHOOL FEES PAID B-34 Development Services Building Department 1635 Faraday Avenue 760-602-2719 www.carlsbadca.gov This form must be completed by the City, the applicant, and the appropriate school districts and returned to the City prior to issuing a tHiiiding pemiit The City will iwA issue any building permit without a completed school fee form. Project Name Building Permit Plan Check Number: Project Address: A.P.N Project Applicant (Owner Name): TAKAMI RESIDENCE CB133160 2233 PAMPLONA WY 215-232-01-00 TOSHIYUKI & KAYOKO TAKAMI Project Description: NEW MANUFACTURED HOME Building Type Residential: Second Dwelling Unit: Residential Additions: Commercial/Industrial: City Certification of 1 NEW DWELLING UNIT(S) 2,976 Square Feet of Living Area in New Dwelling/s Square Feet of Living Area in SDU Net Square Feet New Area Net Square Feet New Area uity uertiTication ot i A , ^ Applicant Information, ^J^^2Wi^^'^'^^'^^ Date 04/18/14 SCHOOL DISTRICTS WITHIN THE CiTY OF CARLSBAD n Carlsbad Unified School District 6225 El Camino Real Carlsbad CA 92009 (760-331-5000) G Vista Uniflsd School District 1234 Arcadia Drive Viste CA 92083 (760-726-2170) ^ San Marcos Unified School District 255 Pico Ave Ste. 100 San Marcos. CA 92069 (760-290-2649) Contact: Nancy Dolce (By Appt. Only) 1 1 Encinitas Union School District 101 South Rancho Santa Fe Rd Endnitas, CA 92024 (760-944-4300x1166) 1 1 San Dieguito Union Hi|^ Schooi District-By Appointment Only 684 Requeza Dr. Endnitas, CA 92024 (760-753-6491 x5514) Certification of Applicant/Owners. The person executing this declaration ("Owner') certifies mder penalty of perjury that (1) ttie infomiation provicted atxwe is conect and true to the t>est of liie Owner's knowledge, and that the Owner win file an amended certification of payment and pay the additional fee If Ounex requests an increase in the number of dwelHng units or square footage after the buHdit^ permit is issued or if the initial determinafion of units or square footage Is found to be incorrect, and that (2) the Owner is the owner/developer of the above described project(s), or that the person executing this dedaration is authorized to sign on behalf of the Owner. Date: ^ Page 1 of 2 Rev. 03/09 SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL FEE CERTIFICATION (To be completed by the school district(s)) ******** ***********************************5lMk*********** THIS FORM INDICATES THAT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROJECT HAVE BEEN OR WILL BE SATISFIED. SCHOOL DISTRICT: The undersigned, being duly authorized by the applicable School District, certifies that the developer, builder, or owner has satis^ed the obligation for school facilities. This is to certify that the applicant listed on page 1 has paid all amounts or completed other applicable school mitigation determined by the School District. The City may issue building pennits for this project. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICIAL TITLE NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT DATE PHONE NUMBER B-34 Page 2 of 2 Rev. 03/09 COG No. 004378 SAN MARCOS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH FEE PROVISIONS ("COC") Education Code Section 17620 and Government Code Section 65995, ef seq. Facilities Planning & Development, 255 Pico Avenue, Suite 250, San Marcos, CA 92069 - (760) 290-2649 Tract No.: .C, ^ 1> J V Project Applicant: Project Owner: Jkpplicant Phone No.: Tto-^i^/ji-J Owner PJnone No.: Ed. Code 17620 and Gov. Code 65995, et seq. • Existing Mitigation Agreement or CFD No.: • Not subject to fee requirements Note: Applicant Declaration: The person executing this declaration ("Applicant") hereby declares, under penalty of perjury under the laws of Califomia, that the following is true and correct: (1) Applicant is acting on behalf of the owner of the above-referenced project ("Project") and is authorized, by such owner, to agree to the terms for issuance for this COC; (2) to the best of the Applicant's knowledge, the information provided herein is true; (3) the square foot amounts used in the fee calculation below were determined by the building department that will issue a building pennit for the construction; and (4) Applicant or owner of the Project will obtain an amended COC and pay any additional amounts due if there is an increase in the number of dwelling units ("DU") or the square footage of any DU or commerdal/industrial stmcture in the Project increases after Applicant has obtained any COC. If the initial determination of the number of units or the square footage is found to be incorrect. Applicant shall be responsible to pay any costs of collection thereof including attorneys' fees and legal costs. Applicant Signature: Print Name: Date: Residential Commercial/Industrial or Qualified Senior Hoii«sina • Commercial/Industrial • Qualified Senior Housing X Fee per sq. ft. = $ Num^erandT^l^fUnits: ^^^^ Number and Type of Units: / Total: S DISTRICT CERTIFICATION: The San Marcos Unified School District ("District") hereby certifies that the Applicant has paid the above-specified amount, which was detennined according to the information presented by the Applicant, and that the COC is issued to Applicant as a prerequisite to the issuance of a building permit(s) for the Lots/DUs specified above. Kayokii T.'f ksaxl 306.5 ^ , ,, , , „. Received From: _; Check No.: Total Amount Collected: $ lL»d.rJ.w •/^,A;,-,--4>//'-t>">^,.. A*J>eji,niBtTat.ivs Secretary b ^ 24l ,on 'i4 Received / Authorized By: t-/20 District Signature Title Date of Issuance NOTICE OF 90-DAY PERIOD FOR PROTEST OF FEES AND STATEMENT OF FEES Govemment Code Section 66020 requires that a district provide: (1) written notice to the Project applicant, at the time of payment of school fees, or other exactions ("Fees"), of the ninety (90) day period to protest the imposition of these Fees and (2) the amount of the Fees. Therefore, this Notice shall serve to advise you that the ninety (90) day protest period in regard to such Fees or the validity thereof, commences with the payment of the Fees or performance of any other requirement as described in Govemment Code Section 66020. Additionally, the amount of the Fees imposed is as stated here, whether payable at this time in whole or in part, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Compliance. As in the latter instance, the ninety (90) day protest period starts on the Date of Issuance. EXPIf^TION OF CERTIFICATE This COC is valid for one hundred eighty (180) days from the Date of Issuance. Extensions will be granted only for good cause, as determined by the Facilities Planning & Development Department of the District, and one (1) sixty (60) day extension may be granted. At such time as this COC expires, if a building permit has not been issued for the Project that is the subject of this COC, the Owner of the Project at the time this COC was issued will be reimbursed all Fees that were paid to obtain this COC without interest. Owner must submit a request for reimbursement in writing to the District Facilities Planning & Development Department. A'' //U THIS COC EXPIRES: i THE EXPIRATION DATE IS EXTENDED TO: SIGNATURE VERIFYING AUTHORIZED EXTENSION: Date: **COC Continued on the Back of This Page** Distribution: Facilities - White Customer - Green Agency - Canary Accounting - Pink Audit - Goldenrod FEE REGULATIONS Residential Fees can be charged on any new square footage within the perimeter of a residential structure, excluding carports, walkways, garages, overhangs, patios, enclosed patios, detached accessory structures, or similar structures (Govemment Code Section 65995 (b)(1)). Fees on room additions are limited by the restrictions above. Additionally, fees on room additions cannot be assessed unless the increase in the assessable square footage of the residence is more than five hundred (500) square feet. If the room addition creates a net increase of greater than five hundred (500) square feet, the fee is charged on the entire net Increase in square footage (Education Code Section 17620 (a)(l)(c)(i)). 2. Commercial/Industrial Fees Government Code Section 65995(b)(2) specifies the type of commercial/Industrial space that may be charged. Fees can be charged on covered and enclosed space within the perimeter of the commercial/industrial structure, not including storage areas incidental to the principal use of the construction, garages, parking structures, unenclosed walkways, or utility or disposal area. 3. Exemptions From Fees Government Code Section 65995(d) states that the following cannot be charged: (1) structures that are tax exempt and used exclusively for religious purposes; (2) private full-time day schools as described in Education Code Section 48222; and (3) structures owned and occupied by a governmental agency. Education Code Section 17626 and Govemment Code Section 66011 together prohibit charging fees on structures replacing those damaged or destn>yed by a natural disaster. However, if the functioning, size, or use of the previous structure is changing, then the resulting increase or change in function, size or use may subject all or part of the new structure to the applicable Fees. 4. Senior-Only Facilities Although senior-only tecilities are residences. Government Code Section 65995.1(a) limits the fees on certain senior-only facilities to that of Commercial/Industrial Fees. The Commercial/Industrial Fee applies to Senior housing, as described in Civil Code Section 51.3, Health and Safety Code Sections 1S69.2(k) and Govemment Code Section 15432(d)(9), as well as mobile home parks where residency is limited to okJer persons, as provided by Govemment Code Section 65995.2. Applicants will tie required to provide proof that their development satisfies the applicable code section bv brinoino in their recorded Covenants Conditions &Restrictions or deed restriction. 5. Mitigation Payments Mitigation Payments will only be refunded pursuant to the terms of the applicable Mitigation Agreement. None of the provisions herein related to expiration or refund apply to payments made pursuant to a Mitigation Agreement. NOTICE OF SCHOOL FEE APPEAL/PROTEST PROCEDURE Pursuant to the Resolution adopting this COC, the following summarizes the District's School Fee Appeal/Protest Procedure for protesting Commercial/Industrial Fees and ResWential Fees (collectively referred to as "School Fees") in order to provide a process that permits the Applteant an opportunity for a hearing to appeal the imposition of School Fees ("Hearing") and to conskler the required notice of protest filed pursuant to Government Code Section 66020: a. Within ninety (90) calendar day of being notified of the School Fees to be Imposed or paying the School Fees, Applicant(s) shall file a written request: 1. By personal delivery, certified or registered mail or ovemight mail (i.e., FedEx or similar senrice) ("Allowable Method") for a Hearing. 2. That contains a statement that payment has been tendered or will be tendered when due, or that any conditions which have been imposed are provided for or satisfied, under protest. 3. That contains a statement(s) informing the Goveming Board ("Board") of the factual elements of the dispute and the legal theory forming the basis for the protest. The possible grounds for appeal include, but are not limited to: a. For Commercial Fees - the inaccuracy of including the Project within the category pursuant to which the Commercial Fees are to be imposed, or that the employee generation or pupil generation factor utilized under the applicable category are inaccurate as applied to the Project. The Applicant appealing the imposition of Commercial Fees shall bear the burden of establishing that the Commercial Fees are improper ("Commercial Grounds for Appeal"). b. For Residential Fees - the Inaccuracy of the pupil generation factors, land cost, development or square footage projections used. The Applicant appealing the Imposition of Residential Fees shall bear the burden of establishing that the Residential Fees are improper ("Residential Grounds for Appeal") (Commercial Grounds for Appeal and Residential Grounds for Appeal collectively referred to as "Grounds for Appeal.'). 4. The written request shall be served on the Assistant Superintendent, Business Services, of the School District ("Assistant Superintendent"). b. Within ten (10) calendar days of receipt of the written request for a Hearing, the Assistant Superintendent, or designee, shall give notice in writing of the date, place and time of the Hearing to Applicant(s). The Assistant Superintendent, or designee, shall schedule and conduct said Hearing within fifteen (15) calendar days of receipt of the written request. The Assistant Superintendent, or designee, shall render a written decision within ten (10) calendar days following the Hearing and serve it by an Allowable Method to Applicant's / Applicants' last known address. c. Within ten (10) calendar days of receipt of the Assistant Superintendent or designee's written decision, Applicant(s) may appeal the Assistant Superintendent or designee's decision to the Board. Applicant(s) shall state in the written appeal the Grounds for Appeal and said written appeal shall be served by an Allowable Method on the Assistant Superintendent. d. Within ten (10) calendar days of receipt of the written request for a Hearing, the Assistant Superintendent, or designee, shall give notice in writing of the date, place and time of the Hearing to the Applicant(s). The Boanj shall schedule and conduct said Hearing at the next regular meeting of the Board, provided that the Applicant(s) is given notice at least five (5) calendar days prior to the regular meeting of the Board. The Board shall render a written decision within ten (10) calendar days following the Hearing on the Applicant's / Applicants' appeal and serve the decision by an allowable Method to the Applicant's last known address. REFUND POLICY If construction does not commence as provided in Education Code Section 17624 and Govemment Code Section 65995, the amount of the Fees paid, minus a Fifty and no/100 Dollar ($50.00) application charge, will be refunded to the Owner of the Project at the time this COC was issued. An authorized written notice from the building department responsible for issuing the building permit declaring that the building permit has been cancelled and no construction has commenced must be delivered to the District's Facilities Planning & Development Department. Refunds will be processed thirty (30) days after receipt of notification. READ AND REVIEWED: APPLICANT SIGNATURE PRINTED NAME ^ CITY OF SEWER DISTRICT Development Services ^ CITY OF CERTIFICATION Building Division 1635 Faraday Avenue CARLSBAD B-19 760-602-2719 www.carlsbadca.gov Leucadia Wastewater District O Vallecitos Water District 1960 La Costa Ave. 201 Vallecitos de Oro Carlsbad, CA 92009 San Marcos, CA 92069 760-753-0155 , 760-744-0460 The following project has been submitted for buildfrig permits: Plan Check No. C/^ / J? 3 Jlp Q ' Date S/i^Jf^ Property Owner Project Address. Assessor's Parcel No. 3^15-013(1-/^1 Project Description City Certification: [ jljilf/fA^^) r^^^^ Date: Please indicate in the space below that the owner has entered into an agreement to have your agency provide public sewer service to the premises, and/or if the existing service is adequate for this project and all required fees have been paid. Permits will not be issued until this forni is completed and retumed to our office. This space to be completed by District Personnel I certify the district requirements for sewer service have been satisfied. : Approved by (y^^^'^^ Date ^/Z^jI l Title FIELD SERVICES .qPFniA! I.ST \ B-36 Page 1 of 1 Rev. 03/09 Branch iR03.User :3497 Commisnt: Station Id :OlIP9 nBConamemauaitowt: CMAIMB TMs Oompwy MDlbMEN RGCOMID luw.-ro ANDIMLTANtTAtEMnnSTO: ToBtilyiikl Takami P.OBOX1430M2 > Carlsbad, CA 82013 i DOCtt ^3-0564392 MMiiiiiiniiiiiiii SEP 12.2013 4:55 PM . . OincUL ACCORDS SAN OlEQO COUNTY RECOflOER'S OFFItt oc oc 7597 PAGES: 4 iffiniiiHMHHiniinBi ORAWTDEED THE UNDEI%SIQNED QRANTOR(S) OECLARECS) DOCUMENTARY TRANSFEK TAX te S280.5O PQ computed on full value of pn>p«tyconvey«d, or ( JooiTipiitMonfUHvBluakMvaliwoflienftorencumbcammremaini^ t} Unincorporated aiea [X] City of Cailsbad FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, raoa^ of wMCh l« hsrebfacknowMgo), Myo«« Nam Umb, a IhrrM Man, as hia Mia and tapantii propMty l\orei>yGRANT(s)(o: Toahiyuki Takami WMfKayoko Takami , HUSBAND AHD WIPB AS JOINT TEMAJNTS the real prepetly In the City of Cailsbad. County Of san Mgo, Stata of Canferni^ LEGAL DESCRIPTION ATTACHED HB^O AS EXHtBH- >• AND MAD£ A PART HSREOF Also Known ac: Vacant Pamoloma Way APN 21 ^232-01-00, Carisbad. CA 82009 AP#; 215-232K)1-00 Mn Sapteaber-ll ' Belbw Hvona HfflH LPB MtK>prov8(]ti»nwontti»(i8iiso(taiiata«k)iy6MdMmtob* tha pafaonfif WfiiWft Mim(s^i«tK «ibscitoed to the inatiMmam sno aoknowtadgwl to ms that haftliaHHn eMKuted the same in MBiksMMr m/tmuea capscHyOsa), and that hMMHINir dgnaluM(s) on lha bninim«m <he pmsm^s). or the oMRy upM Bohslf «r MMch the panon^S^ adtd. cxocutM the InstnimanL •-ill-iin'n "-^^^ — rf0^wl> Hm awWWflOinfl pigfach li InwBW> tBffect ' ' . .. MirmESSnqfhandseal. Leslie M. Toklwa ' ^ ^^^^^IroaaiaafarOlIldaJnotailalsaal) Yd PARVv^hOVM'BBLOW; ir NO PARTY SHOWN. WA. AS DIRECTED ABOV^: Sbnslui» MMLT/ SANDIBOO.CA Document: DD 2013.564392 Page 1 of4 Printed on 2/11/2015 12:38:19 PM Branch :R03,User :3497 Connncnt: Station Id :OXJW Onier No. 400-1512930^7 Exhibtt-A" 7600 Lot m, ofU Costs Vstlcy l^it No. 4. M the Coumy of Sn Dfego. SIBW of Califoroi*. wcording to Ma|) thotof No. fllc<l In the Office ofdie County ReOHderofSin Diego Couniy, September 14.1966. An easement for « piivMle driveway over, along and «cro>a tlie SoMheriy IOJOO feel OTXM 110 and the Northerly 10.00 feet of Lot lit of La CoAa Valley Unit No. 4. in die Coamy ofSan D^go* State of Califomia. according to Map dicKof No. $791, filed in the office of the Cotimy Recorder of «*id OwlMy. Tlie easMnent faarain descflbed is heitby deelaied lo Iw appunenam to and for the ose and benefit of di* present and fimiie owncn of ell Or any poition of lit of LaCuta Valley Unit No. 4. Page? SAN DIEGO.CA Page 4 of 4 Printed on 2/11/2013 12;38;19PM Document: DD 2013.564392 Branch :R03,User ;3497 Comment: Station Id :0UP9 Exhibit "A" 7598 Lo, 19S of L. CosM Vdley Uldl No. 4, fatheColtmy of San DiatO. S«o of CaHfomia, ««Hdl«e a>e™f No. 57«!. filed b, (he OfBee of dieCoiniW Kucnrfcr i>f 3a» D!e?P Coualy. Septeiober M, J946. of (he ClXltlBty RecOKler of^ County. 11a. «-e«e«i«aeia described ail or any portion of all of U Cosw Vailey tJwit No. 4. SANDffiGO,CA Page2of4 Printed on 2/11/2015 l2:3S:19i.M Document: DD 2013.564392 STATE OF CALIFORNIA - BUSINESS, CONSUMER SERVICES, AND HOUSING A3ENCY DEP/«TTV1ENT OF HOUSING >iVgD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Division of Codes and Standards Title Search Date Printed: 02/11/2015 EDMUND O. BROWN JR. Governor Decal #: Manufacturer: Tradename: Model: LBL9875 CMH MANUFACTURING WEST INC GOLDEN WEST KINGSTON MILLEN>JIUM 71KlN42e Manufactured Date: 07/25/2014 ReRistration Exp: First Sold On: 07/29/2014 Use Code: SFD Original Price Code: CBY Rating Year: Tax Type: LPT Last ILT Amount: Date ILT Fee Paid: ILT Exemption: NONE Serial Number PER036451CAAAC PER03645ICABAC PER036451CACAC PER036451CADAC MUD Label / Insignii Length RAD 1509480 66' RAD 1509481 66' RAD 1509482 66' RAD 1509483 27' Record Conditions: ppp Exempt Width 13'6" 13'6" 13'6" 13'6" Registered Owner: TOSHIYUKI TAKAMI KAYOKO TAKAMI (Joint Tenants with Right of Survivorship) 2233 PAMPLOMA WAY CARLSBAD, CA 92009 Last Title Date: 08/19/2014 Last Reg Card: 08/19/2014 Sale/Transfer Info: Price $201,881.00 Transferred on 07/29/2014 Situs Address: 2233 PAMPLOMA WAY CARLSBAD, CA 92009 Situs County: SAN DIEGO *** END OF TITLE SEARCH *** Exhibit "A" Lot 195 of La Costa Valley Unit No. 4, in the County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 5781, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, September 14,1966. As easement for a private driveway over, along and across the southerly 10.000 feet of Lot 180 and the Northerly 10.000 feet of Lot 181 of La Costa Valley Unit No. 4, in the County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 5781, filed in the office of the County Recorder of said County. The easement herein described is hereby declared to be appurtenant to and for the use and benefit of the present and future owners of all or any portion of all of La Costa Valley Unit No. 4. STATE OF CALIFORNIA BUSINESS. TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY DEPARTtVIENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF CODES AND STANDARDS MANUFACTURED HOUSING PROGRAM NUMBER: .• ' -I 0 MANUFACTURER CERTIFICATE OF ORIGIN Q CHECK IF THIS IS A DUPLICATE MCO-ENTER ORIGINAL MCO NO. MANyj^ACTURED HOME OR MULTIFAMILY MANUFACTURED HOUSING Q SFD (SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING) [U MFMH (MULTIFAMILY MANUFACTURED HOUSING) NUMBER OF TRANSPORTABLE SECTIONS COMMERCIAL MODULAR: OCCUPANCY GROUP MANUFACTtJRER LICENSE NUMBER: MANUFACTURER ADDRESS: 2m mm PERRIS BLVD, PERRIS, Cfi 9£571 (Streel) (Cily) SUGGESTED RETAIL PRICE: (Slate) JSEL ,DE NAME: MODEL NAME AND/OR NUMBER: KINKTON MlLLeWIlW 71KIiW£b&4flH14 DATE OF MANUFACTURE: 07/25/14 NAME TRANSFERRED TO): CALIFORNIA DEALER NUMBER OR TRANSFEREE DESIGNATION; ?a76 DATE OF DEALER OR TRANSFEREE ADDRESS; (Street) 145 mn AVENUE, m^ HARCOS, CA 9£e78 (City) (State) (Zip) INVENTORY CREDITOR NAME: INVENTORY CREDITOR ADDRESS: (Street) (City) (Slate) SECTION —SifflL— MANUFACTURER SERIAL NUMBER HCD INSIGNIA OR HUD LABEL NUMBER l.EHeTH (tMCHESt WIDTH WEH3HT {POUWOSl PER03645lCfl m 16£ 31,200 PEfi83645ICA BfiC RflDlS094Bl 792 162 27,053 PEI^645!Cfl CflC RADI^4a2 792 162 27,7^ f€fi036451Cfl MC RflD1509483 324 162 10.930 This is a true & correct farj;imilP TRANSPORTER NAME: HOBILE Kmi or the copy of the Manufc ctured origin ratoincct by TRANSPORTER ADDRESS: 15252 VILLA SIERRA RD, VftlEY CENTER, Cfi 92062 (Stregl) (City) Golden West Homes Pate y'^fy/i/_ (Slate) DESTINATION FOR UNIT DESCRIBED ABOVE (NAM^CIFIC MAtftFACTURED WRC. 145 BENT AlffiWUE. mk I^RCQS. CA 92076 (Slate) J2EL I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above facts are true and correct Executed on _ (Date) SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED AGENT: PERRIS. RIVERSIDE. CA (C*y) (County) (Slats) DISTRIBUTION: ORIGINAL (PINK) FORWARD TO THE tNVENTORY CREDITOR, UNLESS THERE IS NONE. THEN FORWARD TO THE PURCHASER (DEALER OR TRANSFEREE) COPY 1 (WHITEl FORWARD TO THE DEPARTMENT AT P.O. BOX 1828. SACRAMENTO. CA 95812-1828. WITHIN FIVE (5) DAYS OF RELEASE. COPY 2 (YELLOW) DELIVER TO THE TRANSPORTER TO ACCOMPANY THE UNIT TO ITS DESTINATION, COPY 3 (GOLDENROD) TO BE RETAINED BY THE MANUFACTURER, HCD 483.0 - Side 1 - (Rev. 01/12) RECORDING REQUESTED BY: 1^ AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: NAME / /?AJ y /C i^K^T^iSfR)<£.£. STREET p. O • Pox ^'f / ^ /Q ADDRESS S^YTE n<^l and ZIP DOC# 2015-0081819 Illll Feb 24, 2015 12:53 PM OFFICIAL RECORDS Ernest J. Dronenburg, Jr., SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDER FEES: $22.00 SPACE ABOVE THIS UNE FOR RECORDER USE ONLY NOTICE OF MANUFACTURED HOME (MOBILEHOME) OR COMMERCIAL MODULAR INSTALLATION ON A FOUNDATION SYSTEM Recording of Uiis document al ttie request of ttie enforcement agency Indicated Is in accordance with CaHDmia Healtti and Safely Code Section 18551 (a). TMs document Is evidence that the enforcement agency has Issued a certificate of occupancy for Installation of the unit de$crit>ed hereon, upon the real property desalt>ed with certainty below, as of the date of recording. When recorded, this document shall t)e indexed l>y the county recoider to the named owner of the real property and shall t)e deemed to give constaictive notice as to Its contents to all peisons tliereafter dealing with the real propert Mith the real property. > REAL PROBERTY OWNER , . (.^ ^ . CTTY ~ COUNTY ,^->v STATE ZIP IN^miLATION kLMUNG ADORES^ IF DIREERENT f 7^ V„ crrr COUNTY STATE ZIP UNH' OWNER (11 also proiierty owwr, write -SAMF) MAILING AOORESS ENFORCEME^h AGENCY ISSUING PERMIT^ CERTIRCATE OF OCCUPANCY/ ^ MAi; CITY iFORCEMEJr AGENCY ISSUING PERMIT|and CERTIRCA TY _ _ COUNTY /krATE , zip" INS BFRM»nrt y TFLFPHONF IAIURFR BUILDING SIGN*TUI*S«F ENFORCEMENT ACEllCY OFFICIAL If nd a dsalar sale.' TELEPHONE NUMBER 2 VZ^Vs^ DATE DEALER NAME Of r >.wflt«-NONE') DEALER LICENSE NO. UNIT DESCRIPTION . FACTIWER'S NAME MANUFACTIMER'S NAME i DATEjOF MANUFACTURE . , MODEL NAMEMUMSSR "T" aNU»llBER(S) _ _ ' ' LENGTH X WIDTH INSIGNIAAJ^BELNUMreR(4) • INSIGNIAAJ^BtLNUMBER(S) SERIAL NUMBER(S) _ _ ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER RFAL PROPFRTV LEGAl DESCRIPTION HCD REGISTRATION DECAL NUMBER MCO NUMBER HOD FORM 433(A) Rev3/200S WHITE—County RecwOer CANARY—HCD PINK—Appllcam QOLDENROD-Buliaing Dept Branch .ROS.User :3497 Comment; Station Id :0UP9 Exhibit "A" 7598 Lot 19). of Ll COKB Vtlley Unit No. 4, la die County of Soi Dicio, Stale of Caliibniia, accoiding to Mop dwreofNo. 57t t, filed in dwOfteafilieCoun(yRe(nidcxofSanDie(DCounty, Scjileinlxr 14,19M, Aaeiicnwnl for a private driveway over, along and acFoaellKSo<«hcTly 10.00 teat ori>ai ISO and the Northerly 10.00 feel of Lot 181 afl.* COM Vdley Unit No. 4, in UM County orstn Diego. StiU ofCalifMnii, Kcocdias w Map ibereof No. 37SI, Sled in the ofTicG of du Coumy Reeonler of aid Coumy. IIK cascmou licrein described is lieieliy declared to te ippunenul to and for the uie and benefn of Ihe present and future ovmers of all or any ponion of all of La Costa Valley ttall No. 4. SAN DIEGO.CA Document: DD 2013.564392 Page 2 of4 Primed on 2/11/2015 12:38:19 PM ^ CITY OF PLUMBING, Development Services ^ CITY OF ELECTRICAL, Building Division ^ CITY OF MECHANICAL 1635 Faraday Avenue 760-602-2719 CARLSBAD WORKSHEET B-18 www.carlsbadca.sov BulldingPcarlsbadca.gov Project Address: Permit No.: Infomxitlon provided below refers to work being done on the abot/e mentioned permit only. This form must be completed and returned to the Building Division before the permit con be issued Building Dept. Fax: (760) 602-8558 Number of new or reloccrtiecl fixtures, traps, or floor drains i 3 New building sewer line? Ves ^ No Number of new roof drains? ^ Install/alter water line? ^ Number of new water heaters? ^ Number of new, relocated or replaced gas outlets? ^ Number of new hose bibs? ^ Residentidl Permits: New/expanded service: Number of new amps: 200 Minor Remodel onfy: Ves No ^ Commercicd/lndustrial: Tenant Improvement: Number of existing amps Involved in this project: ^ Number of new amps involved in this project: ^^^-^ New Construction: Amps per Panel: Single Phase Number of new amperes -z-e^ Three Phase Numlser of new amperes ^ Three Phase 480 Number of new amperes" '^'^ Number of new furnaces, A/C, or heat pumps? |_ New or relocated duct worb? Ves No Number of new fireplaces? \ Number of new exhaust fans? ^ Relocate/install vent?. C Number of new exhaust hoods? 1 Number of new boilers or compressors? Number of HP B-18 Page 1 of 1 Rev. 03/09 City of Carlsbad Permit No: Address VALUATION WORKSHEET Building Division Assessor Parcel No. Date By Type of Work Area of Work Multiplier VALUE SFD and Duplexes 2,976 $110.17 $327,865.92 Residential Additions $131.73 $0.00 Remodels / Lofts $57.48 $0.00 Apartments & Multi-family $98.20 $0.00 Garages/Sunrooms/Solariums 768 $28.74 $22,072.32 Patio/Porch/Carport $9.58 $0.00 Enclosed Patio $15.51 $0.00 Decks/Balconies/Stairs $15.57 $0.00 Retaining Walls, concrete,masonry $19.16 $0.00 Pools/Spas-Gunite $40.72 $0.00 Tl/Stores, Offices $37.12 $0.00 Tl/Medical, restaurant, H occupancies $50.30 $0.00 Photovoltaic Systems/ # of panels $400.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Fire Sprinkler System 3,747 $3.11 $11,653.17 Air Conditioning - commercial $5.03 $0.00 Air Conditioning - residential 2,976 $4.19 $12,469.44 Fireplace/ concrete, masonry $3,855.98 $0.00 Fireplace/ prefabricated Metal $2,621.34 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 TOTAL $374,060.85 Valuation: $374,061 Comm/Res (C/R): C Building Fee $1,773.62 Plan Check Fee $1,241.53 Strong Motion Fee $79.00 Green BIdg. Stand. Fee $12.00 Green BIdg PC Fee $150.00 License Tax/PFF $13,092.13 License Tax/PFF (in CFD) $6,807.91 CFD isthourof Plan checkFire Expedite Plumbing TBD Mechanical TBD Electrical TBD CFD 0 Yes {PFF= 1.82%) 0 No (PFF = 3.5%) Land Use: Density: Improve. Area: Fiscal Year: Annex. Year: Factor: CREDITS PFF and/orCFD Explanation: •,id^ City of Carlsbad Permit No: Address VALUATION WORKSHEET Assessor Parcel No. Date By Building Division Type of Work Area of Work Multiplier VALUE SFD and Duplexes $110.17 $0.00 Residential Additions $131.73 $0.00 Remodels / Lofts $57.48 $0.00 Apartments & Multi-family $98.20 $0.00 Garages/Sunrooms/Solariums $28.74 $0.00 Patio/Porch/Carport $9.58 $0.00 Enclosed Patio $15.51 $0.00 Decks/Balconies/Stairs $15.57 $0.00 Retaining Walls, concrete,masonry $19.16 ^ ~5D:QP Pools/Spas-Gunite .-^—•x $o.oo\ Tl/Stores, Offices ^ $0.00 1 Tl/Medical, restaurant, H occupancies $0.00 / Photovoltaic Systems/ # of panels $400.00 /I $o.oq/ $0.00 / / $0.06 $0.00 / / $0/6o // $0.00 S( K $<5.oo / / ^ $O.OQ/() / \ /$0.00 Fire Sprinkler System / ( ) / $0.00 Air Conditioning - commercial / / / $Ve3 ^ / $0.00 Air Conditioning - residential / ' M.vi) / $0.00 Fireplace/ concrete, masonry / / / $0.00 Fireplace/ prefabricated Metal / ^ $2,621.34 y $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 rOTAL Valuation: $93,515 Comm/Res (C/R): C Building Fee $666.22 Plan Check Fee $466.35 Strong Motion Fee $20.00 Green BIdg. Stand. Fee $1.00 Green BIdg PC Fee $150.00 License Tax/PFF $3,273.03 License Tax/PFF (in CFD) $1,701.98 CFD 1st hour of Plan CheckFire Expedite Plumbing TBD Mechanical TBD Electrical TBD $0.00 CFD 0 Yes (PFF=1.82%) 0 No (PFF = 3.5%) Land Use: Density: Improve. Area: Fiscal Year: Annex. Year: Factor: CREDITS PFF and/orCFD Explanation: SEWER DISTRICT Development Services Building Division 1635 Faraday Avenue ^ CITY OF CERTIFICATION Development Services Building Division 1635 Faraday Avenue CARLSBAD B-19 760-602-2719 v\/ww.carlsbadca.gov ^ Leucadia Wastewater District Q Vallecitos Water District 1960 La Costa Ave. 201 Vallecitos de Oro Carlsbad, CA 92009 San Marcos, CA 92069 760-753-0155 760-744-0460 The following project has been submitted for building permits: Plan Check No. C/^ / ? 3 P Date ^/fe^/f ^ Property Owner Project Address /9v^J? J PA? f ^0 ./j- ll)V Assessor's Parcel No. Project Description City Certifcation: '^ ^j^fyl^f^ ^^({1^ Date: ^/M/ZY Please indicate in the space below that the owner has entered into an agreement to have your agency provide public sewer sen/ice to the premises, and/or if the existing service is adequate for this project and all required fees have been paid. Permits will not be issued until this form is completed and returned to our office. This space to be completed by District Personnel I certify the district requirements for sewer service have been satisfied. Approved by Date Title B-36 Page 1 of 1 Rev. 03/09 CB133160 2233 PAIMPLONAWY TAKAMI: 2,976 SF MODULAR HOME ff^ C<^J'/ y^^^/^ ^//D//</- IT Vt> (lu^i iir4) ^/^/^ Final Inspectiori n • Plan •Muired by: y y^CIM&l ^^iFire Approved ^ /^''[Date BUIU3ING PLANNING ENGINEERING FIRE Expedite? Y N •cv. Mite AFS Checked by: HazMat APCD Health Forms/Fees Sent Reed Due? By Encina Fire HazHealthAPCD PE&M School f^ryf Sewer Stormwater ' Special Inspection CFD: Y LandUse: 1^ Density: ImpArea: FY: Annex: Factor: .1-PFF: Comments Date Date Date Date Building Planning Engineering Fire ^;37/|3 Need? 2: • Done