The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2235 FARADAY AVE; P; CB000121; Permitv/5Dtb City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 10/27/2000 Commercial/Industrial Permit Permit No: CB000121 · Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 Job Address: Permit Type: Parcel No: Valuation: Occupancy Group: Project Title: 10/27/2000 Applicant: 2235 FARADAY AV CBAD St: P Tl Sub Type: 2120612500 Lot#: $18,004.00 Construction Type: 28 Reference #: DELOITTE & TOUCHE,643 SF Tl WHSE TO OFFICE INDUST 0 NEW Owner: Status: Applied: Entered By: Issued: Inspect Area: ISSUED 01/12/2000 RMA Plan Approved: 10/27/2000 C.S.I. GENERAL INC. CARLSBAD COMMERCE CEN:V.11:8.~W/00 C/O STEPHEN M ZOTOVICH (1{)02 01 CGP 1557 GRAND AVE . SAN MARCOS, CA 92069 619-432-6677 Total Fees: $1,285.77 Building Permit Add'I Building Permit Fee Plan Check Add'I Plan Check Fee Plan Check Discount Strong Motion Fee Park Fee LFM Fee Bridge Fee STD #2 Fee BTD #3 Fee Renewal Fee Add'I Renewal Fee Other Building Fee Pot. Water Con. Fee Meter Size Add'I Pot. Water Con. Fee Reel. Water Con. Fee 840 NEWPORT CENTER DR #420 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 Total Payments To Date: $153.45 Balance Due: $1,132.32 $192.33 Meter Size $0.00 Add'I Reel. Water Con. Fee $0.00 $125.01 Meter Fee $0.00 $0.00 SDCWAFee $0.00 $0.00 CFD Payoff Fee $0.00 $3.78 PFF $0.00 $0.00 PFF (CFD Fund) $0.00 $0.00 License Tax $0.00 $0.00 License Tax (CFD Fund) . $0.00 $0.00 Traffic Impact Fee $220.34 $0.00 Traffic Impact (CFD Fund) $0.00 $0.00 LFMZ Transportation Fee $0.00 $0.00 PLUMBING TOTAL $0.00 $55.00 ELECTRICAL TOTAL $0.00 $0.00 MECHANICAL TOTAL $0.00 Master Drainage Fee: $0.00 $0.00 Sewer Fee: $689.31 $0.00 Redev Parking Fee: $0.00 TOTAL PERMIT FEES $1,285.77 FINAL APPROVAL Date:~ Clearance: _____ _ NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "Imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as "fees/exactions." You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capactiy changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project. NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which ou have reviousl been iven a NOTICE similar to this or as to which the statute of limitations has reviousl otherwise ex ired. 02 .1132-32 I "' FOR OFFICE USE ONLY PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad CA 92009 (760) 438~1161 PLAN CHECK NO. F LU EST.VAL. &3(5 Plan Ck. Deposit --::,,.....--1,--'--~---,r- Validated By _ ___.,e:::,1,-..__.....,_ _ _,...,...,..,,........,,..,..,,.,-,, Date _________ -J...+-i..__...,,_ ....... ...._ Business Name (at this address) Legal Description Subdivision Name/Number units 153-45 Name Address City State/Zip l11;:i1,',~~l!ipAj:f:Y: ;jD\~\'i~ril:it~l'F S'fif/».1lill,t;f;~f~~~~ci:tit>'liffflli1f'41ljjr: .. :@lkiQl!nf'l'ffl:~ri!!lt:i;;: . .. . . . ..... J;f: • . . . .. ;a:lr;: i:"" , iiF ?.,iii~;: CS/ Gr,,,.e,.--t:t/, /'1c..: l.>2&:f Gra.~ Ave.-nve,~f?::..A-· S"a1--1 /"1R~~or o/2.0Co/ 76o/lf'7l-9..s'<:f8 Name ' 7 Address 1 ~ City State/Zip Telephone# ,:;~~'l'::~'6::;~~;t~;~~;: '''z,i~~lig~~~l~ :?~.' ?~ t .,:ih'db;J;,;;;~"d;J;t~ '~3'!.i''~6 / Name C.-/0 :_sz.. /?~ E-sfq -ft-Address City ' State/Zip Telephone# ,Jiii1:i:,\fCc:l~-l'l.!MoMlf_,.~-ME;: · , ,::;~;1;mp111...,,;.:· (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed stat!!ment that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law [Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars [$5001). C. CS\ G~ \, IYi c< /r;;29 GYct~ +::e., ~1!?. A-; S'.. H., CA. q2DG9 76::>/'f7/-C/3e>'E' Name ' 1 Address City State/Zip Telephone# State License # 53 7 Db t: License Class B. City Business License # I 1'9 81 a I C$1 Gei-i., /pc.; ' /.>2-Cf Gl"a.vie:J Ave.., (te. A-.~ ~-'fVI-1 CA-Cj-r..ober 7~/'r7f-7'/crj' Designer Name ' cL Address ' 7 City State/Zip Telephone State License # ,9 70 b L llllltl[JU(ER$t:,c:1Ji•SATlb:N•.·t:zr11111rat•'t"' · ··::c: t:m:a11~~b'.,/i:, :;f:,;',.,n·~ ,: ;;,: ',Sri,>;: Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: 0 I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. iKJ I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Insurance Company µ ,ct c~i:::rt::vfy , .. C C-o . Policy No. N 2 0(08 ti-5 -z 2.. Expiration Date tf-IO I / oo (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($1001 OR LESS) D CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars ($10(!,000, in addi~n to the cost of.compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees. SIGNATURE -''~ DATE 1/I2--Joo l~i::1::11e>MER~BUltDE8.'"t.>ecillA!lA'riQfi1lrrt";~ , ·.· · .. s+;rf~·' '::"' · ·•· <K,. ::,~:v · >A':t,]lt~ > I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: D I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). D I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). D I am exempt under Section ______ Business and Professions Code for this reason: 1. I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. D YES ONO 2. I (have/ have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. 3. I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): 4. I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone number/ contractors license number): _____________________________________________ _ 5. I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type of work): _______________________________________________________ _ Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? 0 YES r!i!1, NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? 0 YES ~ NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site 7 0 YES ~ NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. !3}rr--BB!JgtJQtj;ftii,ll:>1li~~§.ENC:Yl)i;i ,,/';, __ ·, · '/?•t;t;'b.·3&!11l.i1!!.d:<.. · ,·e·:,,,r ;:••ilre~'''.'": <.,,:''I!!!' I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097(il Civil Code). LENDER'S NAME __ f'l_,/~A_,-"'---------- :t.?irf~.eplJCAf,ll'. C.Eitttli~u.Qfil;;:/,•·' ··· ,.':?;i;lllilllli1~J r:•,,~""";.... · •:c::~::·~~~~,1''7~~!,,1 \ ····"""'"·'··""'· .. , ... -..• ., ,,. (-!!ii,.._~:; I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the Gitt of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the Building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 365 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after ~e ~ is ~ced for a ~e~od of 180 day&. (Section 106.4.4 Uniform Building Code). APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE ~~ p • ~ ~ DATE 1/ / 2.. /00 WHITE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 01/23/2001 Permit# CB000121 Inspector Assignment: TP --- Title: DELOITTE & TOUCHE,643 SF Tl Description: WHSE TO OFFICE Type:TI Job Address: Sub Type: INDUST 2235 FARADAY AV Phone: 7608020032 Inspector£ Suite: p Lot Location: APPLICANT C.S.I. GENERAL INC. Owner: Remarks: Total Time: CD Description 19 29 39 49 Final Structural Final Plumbing Final Electrical Final Mechanical Associated PCRs lns[2ection History Date Description 01/17/2001 89 Final Combo 01/12/2001 89 Final Combo 12/22/2000 89 Final Combo 12/21/2000 89 Final Combo 12/12/2000 89 Final Combo 12/11/2000 89 Final Combo 12/06/2000 89 Final Combo 11/20/2000 84 Rough Combo 11/17/2000 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 11/17/2000 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 11/17/2000 24 Rough/Topout 11/17/2000 34 Rough Electric 11/17/2000 44 Rough/Ducts/Dampers 11/08/2000 17 Interior Lath/Drywall 11/07/2000 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 11/07/2000 17 Interior Lath/Drywall 0 Requested By: MANNY Entered By: CHRISTINE Act Comments +=--- Act lnsp Comments NR TP co TP SAME CORR NR TP co TP T-24 RESTRMS NOT COMP. co TP SEE JOB CARD NS TP co TP H-CAP REST RM -ACCESS TO ROOF UNIT AP PD co TP T-GRID ATTACHMENT TO NEW STR RM. AP TP TRAIN RM T-BAR CEIL WC TP AP TP TRAIN RM CEIL LITES AP TP TRAIN RM DUCTS AP TP AP TP PA TP OK TO TAPE ONE SIDE City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 11/17/2000 Permit# CB000121 Inspector Assignment: TP --- Title: DELOITTE & TOUCHE,643 SF Tl Description: WHSE TO OFFICE Type:TI Sub Type: INDUST Job Address: 2235 FARADAY AV Suite: p Lot Location: APPLICANT C.S.I. GENERAL INC. Owner: Remarks: Total Time: CD 14 Description Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 0 Act Comments Phone: 7608020032 Inspector: Q_ Requested By: MANNY Entered By: ROBIN A~ -"'-?A..:;.~ ...... w:='j""",._;~#..;:,.,M=--:...:·"'""'o=-=-..L..-z::___:..t1='.J(J=11-...;.....,,c"""A:::.....:...~,=L-=----- 24 Rough/Topout VC.-____________________ _ 34 )I ~--:-=-"' / I --~I/ i I ~ Rough Electric ""''L ~ c ,:---c;,... "'" ~ /() /J _, , .,,. L/V vf':r 44 R1;mgh/Ducts/Dampers -------------,---------- /1/ ________ c:,,Q I'kAt,2 /177/JCIJAZJ-ft;; AIW r[/fd?JVI • Associated PCRs lnsQection Histoey Date Description Act lnsp Comments 11/8/2000 17 Interior Lath/Drywall AP TP 11/7/2000 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding AP TP 11/7/2000 17 Interior Lath/Drywall PA TP OK TO TAPE ONE SIDE 11/7/2000 34 Rough Electric AP TP CilY of Carlsbad · Final Building Inspection r------, Dept: Building Engineering Planning CMWD St Lite Fire-' Plan Check #: Date: 12/1/2000 Permit#: CB000121 Permit Type: Tl Project Name: DELOITTE & TOUCHE,643 SF Tl Sub Type: INDUST WHSE TO OFFICE Address: 2235 FARADAY AV #P Lot: 0 Contact Person: MANNY Phone: 7608020032 Sewer Dist: CA Water Dist: CA .......................................................................................................................................................... lns_pected {! L?d Date l;i/5/ocJ i----;sapproved: __ By. . ~ Inspected: Approved: I Inspected Date By: Inspected: Approved: Disapproved: __ Inspected Date By: Inspected: Approved: Disapproved:_._ .......................................................................................................................................................... , Comments: ______________________________ _ EsGil Corporation In Partnership with Government for Building Safety DATE: 10/24/00 JURISDICTION: City of Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-121 SET: III PROJECT ADDRESS: 2235 Faraday Ave. Suite P PROJECT NAME: Deloitte & Touche D AP~T ccr::JuRis. D PLAN REVIEWER D FILE D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. ~ The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified in the remarks below are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. D The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. D The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: ~ Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. D Esgil Corporation staff did advise. the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone#: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person {\(\ / ~ REMARKS: Person responsible for the prep~•~ the plans to sign all sheet and note on the plans "No AC cabling allowed per the Cit Carlsbad". Additional plan check fees required as the result of removal of mezzanine. By: Doug Moody Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC Enclosures: LOG trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858) 560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 { r City of Carlsbad 00-121 10/24/00 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: City of Carlsbad PREPARED BY: Doug Moody PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-121 DATE: 10/24/00 BUILDING ADDRESS: 2235 Faraday Ave. Suite P BUILDING OCCUPANCY: B BUILDING AREA PORTION ( Sq. Ft.) Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers · TOTAL VALUE Jurisdiction Code cb f 1994 USC Building Permit Fee ... 1 ! 1994 UBC Plan Check Fee Type of Review: D Repetitive Fee CGRepeats Comments: D Complete Review TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: III Valuation Multiplier Dother 0 Hourly Reg. Mod. o.sl Esgil Plan Review Fee VALUE ($) I I 54.48 .... I ____ s_4_.4___.sl 0 Structural Only 43.ssl Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue.doc EsGil Corporation In Partnership with Government for Building Safety DATE: 9/25/00 JURISDICTION: City of Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-121 SET:11 PROJECT ADDRESS: 2235 Faraday Ave. Suite P PROJECT NAME: Deloitte & Touche D APPLICANT ~ D PLAN REVIEWER D FILE D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. D The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. ~ The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. ~ The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: CSI General Inc. 1529 Grand Ave. Suite A, San Marcos, Ca. 92069 D Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. ~ Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: CSI General Inc Telephone#: 760-471-9388 Date contacted: °J / 2...e:, ( CS/) (by: (+.x) Fax #: 760-471-0149 Mail Jelephone D REMARKS: Faxl,.,-" In Person By: Doug Moody Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC Enclosures: 9/18/00 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858) 560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 City of Carlsbad 00-121 II 9/25/00 RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: City of Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-121 PROJECT ADDRESS: 2235 Faraday Ave. Suite P SET: II DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 9/18/00 REVIEWED BY: Doug Moody FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): DATE RECHECK COMPLETED: 9/25/00 This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. A. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints to: ESGIL CORPORATION. B. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans: C. The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews. The original correction number has been given for your reference. In case you did not keep a copy of the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding corrections. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items. D. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? DYes DNo City of Carlsbad 00-121 II 9/25/00 These corrections are in response to items not fully addressed or as the result of information provided. 7. Please revise the plans to show a complying set of stairs to access the storage mezzanine per the requirements of USC Section 1003.3.3 and 509. Provide design and calculations from the Engineer for the stairs, landing and guardrail. Please revise the plans to show the stairs to comply with section 1003.3.3.3( the rise of the stairs shall not exceed 7" and the run of the stairs shall not be less than 11" ), with section 1003.3.3.6 show a handrails (Section 1003.3.3.6): • Handrails are required on each side of stairways. Stairways less than 44" wide or stairways serving one dwelling unit may have one handrail (if not open on both sides). • Handrails and extensions shall be 34" to 38" above nosing of treads and be continuous. • The handgrip portion of all handrails shall be not less than 1-1/4 inches or more than 2 inches in cross-sectional dimension. Handrails projecting from walls shall have at least 1-1/2 inches between the wall and the handrail. • One rail shall extend 12" beyond top and bottom risers. • Ends of handrails shall be returned or shall have rounded terminations or bends. Please provide a shear wall schedule and indicate on the plans the location of all shear walls and their lengths. Please clarify the note on the foundation plan to show an additional 2, #4 reinforcing bars 6' in length at the top and bottom. Please provide a detail for the support of the 4x8 beam at the top of the stairs carrying the landing load shown on section A. How does it attach to the outside staircase wall. Is there a post to support it? Please provide a detail for the attachment of the full height mezzanine walls to the roof structure. Please note or show a GFCI protected weatherproof roof receptacle within 25' of the new AC unit. EsGil Corporation 1n Partnersfiip witfi {jovernment for 'BuiMing Safety DATE: 1/24/00 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-0121 SET: I PROJECT ADDRESS: 2235 Faraday Avenue Ste. P PROJECT NAME: Deloitte & Touche N REVIEWER 0 FILE D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. D The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have sigTiificant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. • The check list transmitted herewith is for your infor~-ation. The plans are being held at-Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for r~. D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the juristjJction to forward to the applicant contact person. - • The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: CS! General Inc. 1529 Grand Ave. Ste. A San Marcos, Ca. 92069 • Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant, except by mail, that the plan check has been completed. D Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted: (by: Mail Telephone Fax In Person D REMARKS: By: 'Mike Puckett Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC Telephone#: Fax#: Enclosures: 1/13/00 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858) 560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad 00-0121 1/24/00 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST TENANT IMPROVEMENTS PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-0121 OCCUPANCY: B TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA: SPRINKLERS?: Yes REMARKS: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: 1/12/00 DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED: 1/24/00 FOREWORD {PLEASE READ): JURISDICTION: Carlsbad. - USE: Office ACTUAL AREA: 184sf Storage Mezzanine 643sf Office TI STORIES: HEIGHT: OCCUPANT LOAD: 7 TI DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 1/13/00 PLAN REVIEWER: Mike Puckett This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Code sections cited are based on the 1997 UBC. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. TENANT IMPROVEMENTS WITHOUT SPECIFIC ENERGY DATA OR POLICY SUPPLEMENTS (1997UBC) tiforw.dot Carlsbad 00-0121 1/24/00 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92009, (760) 438-1161. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 2. Please show the use of the adjacent tenant spaces on the site plan. 3. Please show the glazing in the following locations to be of safety glazing material in accordance with Section 2406.4 (see exceptions): a) Fixed or operable panels adjacent to a door where the nearest exposed edge of the glazing is within a 24-inch arc of either vertical edge of the door in a closed position and where the bottom exposed edge of the glazing is less than 60 inches above the walking surface. 4. The City of Carlsbad requires a soils report for all new work. Please provide a soils report and show the findings and recommendations on the plans and in the Engineer's calculations. 5. Please revise the plan details on sheet S1 to show HD-6A hold down devices as per the Engineer's calculations. 6. The following anchor bolt requirements shall apply in Seismic Zones 3 and 4, per Section 1806.6.1: Plate washers (minimum size of 2" x 2" x 3/16") shall be used on each anchor bolt. 7. Please revise the plans to show a complying set of stairs to access the storage mezzanine per the requirements of UBC Section 1003.3.3 and 509. Provide design and calculations from the Engineer for the stairs, landing and guardrail. 8. Please show the location of the proposed HVAC unit on the plans. Provide an equipment schedule to show the weight of the unit, supply air cfm, outside air cfm etc. Show that a GFCI protected weatherproof receptacle will be provided within 25'- 0" of the new HVAC roof top mounted equipment. Detail the routing and size of the condensate drain piping. Carlsbad 00-0121 1/24/00 9. Please provide the panel schedule that will provide the electrical power for the new tenant space and equipment. Show all loads and total ampere loads. Show the location of the panel on the plans. To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: Yes 0 No 0 The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Mike Puckett at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. Carlsbad 00-0121 1/24/00 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 00 .. 0121 PREPARED BY: Mike Puckett DATE: 1/24/00 BUILDING ADDRESS: 2235 Faraday Avenue Ste. P BUILDING OCCUPANCY: B TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN I BUILDING PORTION I BUILDING AREA VALUATION VALUE (ft. 2) MULTIPLIER ($) Tenant Improvement 184Mezz/643Office 28.00 23,156.00 Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE 23,156.00 D 1994 UBC Building Permit Fee • Bldg. Permit Fee by ordinance: $ 236.08 D 1994 UBC Plan Check Fee • Plan Check Fee by ordinance: $ 153.45 Type of Review: D Complete Review D Structural Only D Hourly D Repetitive Fee Applicable D Other: Esgil Plan Review Fee: $ 122.76 Comments: Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue:doc 519 ' . DATE: 1( l] loo BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST CB c)(;)C) I L---l BUILDING ADDRESS: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL DENIAL The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to build. [A Right-of-Way permit is required prior to construction of the following improvements: attached report of deficiencies ake necessary corrections to plans or speci ation for compliance with applicable codes and s ndards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications tot · office for review. By: Date: ~ By: Date: By: Date: SE ONLY G AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE BUILDING PER ATTACHMENTS D Dedication Application D Dedication Checklist D Improvement Application D Improvement Checklist D Future Improvement Agreement D Grading ·Permit Application D Grading Submittal Checklist D Right-of-Way Permit Application D Right-of-Way Permit Submittal Checklist and Information Sheet D Sewer Fee Information Sheet ENGINEERING DEPT. CONTACT PERSON Name: KATHLEEN M. FARMER City of Carlsbad Address: 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 Phone: (619) 438-1161, ext. 4374 CFD INFORMATION Parcel Map No: Lots: R~cordation: Carlsbad Tract: A-4 0 0 0 0 0 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST SITE PLAN 1. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: A. North Arrow D. Property Lines B. Existing & Proposed Structures E. Easements C. Existing Street Improvements F. Right-of-Way Width & Adjacent Streets G. Driveway widths 2. Show on site plan: A. Drainage Patterns 1. Building pad surface drainage must maintain a minimum slope of one percent towards an adjoining street or an approved drainage course. 2. ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE: "Finish grade will provide a minimum positive drainage of 2% to swale 5' away from building." B. Existing & Proposed Slopes and Topography 3. Include on title sheet: A. Site address B. Assessor's Parcel Number C. Legal Description For commercial/industrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, include: total building square footage with the square footage for each different use, existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses· (manufacturing, warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved. EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE 4a. Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of approval for Project No .. _______________________ _ 4b. All conditions are in compliance. Date: __________ _ IILASPALMAS\SYSILIBRARYIENG\WORD\OOCS\CHKLSnBullding Plancheck Cklst BP0001 Fann KF,doc Rev, 9/3/97 2 0 0 0 0 0 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS 5. Dedication for all street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the building site and any storm drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and for remodels with a value at or exceeding $ ___ --,-__ , pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.030. Dedication required as follows: ________________ _ Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land -Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8 ½" x 11" plat map and submit with a title report. All easement documents must be approved and signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process. Submit the completed application form with the required checklist_ items and fees to the Engineering Department in person. Applications will not be accept by mail or fax. Dedication completed by:____________ Date: ___ _ IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS 6a. All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the construction exceeds $ _______ , pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.040. Public improvements required as follows: _____________ _ Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public improvement requirements. A registered Civil Engineer must' prepare the appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements on the attached checklist to the Engineering Department through a separate plan check process. The completed application form and tlie requirements on the checklist must be submitted· in person. Applications by mail or fax are not accepted. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of building permit. Improvement Plans signed by: _________ _ Date: ---- 6b. Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title report or current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $ _______ so we may prepare the necessary Future Improvement Agreement. This agreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building permit. Future public improvements required as follows: \ILASPALMASISYS\LIBRARY\ENGIWORDIDDCS\CHKLS1\Bullding Plancheck Cklst BP0001 Fann KF.doc Rev. 9/3/97 3 1st./ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 6c. Enclosed please find your Future Improvement Agreement. Please return agreement signed and notarized to the Engineering Department. Future Improvement Agreement completed by: Date: 6d. No Public Improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or defective improvements found adjacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction of the City Inspector prior to occupancy. GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section 11.06.030 of the Municipal Code. ?a. Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading requirements. Include accurate grading quantities ( cut, fill import, export). 7b. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by. a registered Civil Engineer must be submitted together with the completed application form attached. NOTE: The -Grading Permit must be issued and rough grading approval obtained prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Grading Inspector sign off by: Date: ----------- 7c. Graded Pad Certification required. (Note: Pad certification may be required even if a grading permit is not required.) 7d. No Grading Permit required. ?e. If grading is not required, write "No Grading" on plot plan. MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS 8. A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-Way and/or private work adjacent to the public Right-of-Way. Types of work include, but are not limited to: street improvements, tree trimming, driveway construction, tieing into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities. Right-of-Way permit required for: I\LASPALMASISYS\LIBRARYIENG\WORDIDOCSICHKLS1\Bu1ld1ng Plancheek Cldst BP0001 Fonn KF.doc Rev. 9/3/97 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 9. A SEWER PERMIT is required concurrent with the building permit issuance. The fee is noted in the fees section on the following page. 10. INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT If your facility is located in the City of Carlsbad sewer service area, you need to contact the Carlsbad Municipal Water District, located at 5950 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008. District personnel can provide forms and assistance, and will check to see if your business enterprise is on the EWA Exempt List. You may telephone (760) 438-2722, extension 153, for assistance. · Industrial Waste permit accepted by: Date: 11. NPDES PERMIT Complies with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant shall provide best management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever occur:,s-t. 12. ~equired fees are attached O No fees required 13. Local Facilities Management Zone Transportation Fee Agmt Signed. -aJ:;tJ;:e,J...el (Y\U,d./.J ~J., } °"~~~ .-(}-t{_~ ~ ci-0 Nf?1"' C.,~ 14. Additiona1 Comments: H:IWORO\DOCSICHKLSnBwldmg P/ancheck Ck/st BP0001 Form KF.doc 5 Rev. 9/3/97 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET 0 Estimate based on unconfirmed information from applicant. 0 Calculation .based on b cJin plancheck plan submittal. Address: 'L,,1-3( {(.A#.-ri -,ff ? Bldg. Permit No. crJ? /%{ Prepared by:_____ Date: _____ · Checked by: ____ Date: ____ _ EDU CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses. Types of Use: Q ff: . Sq: Ft./Units: . ~ EDU's: • .;).3 __ Types of Use:_______ Sq. Ft./Units: ' EDU's: ____ _ ADT CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses. r o e;.s-y Types of Use: 0--~ Sq. Ft./Units: /2.-¥0-z;;C,.l.9&;J--ADT's: ____ _ Types of Use: 'l Sq. Ft.Nnits: _ ~ ,o,J-ADt's: _____ _ p'/ .l FEES REQUIRED: WITHIN CFO: CJ YES_ fno bridge & thoroughfare fee in District #1. reduced Traffic Impact Fee) 0 NO D 1. PARK-IN-LIEU FEE PARK AREA & #: ___ _ FEE/UNIT:. __ __,; __ X NO. UNITS:. __ _ CJ 2. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE r / Vj,S'Y ADT's/UNITS: ____ _ ZONE TRANSPORTATION ADT'S X FEE/ADT: 'J._,, 3 Of,&7( X $10 D 3. BRIDGE AND THOROUGHFARE 1 FEE 101ST. #1 DIST. #2 ADT's/UNITS: ____ _ X FEE/ADT: ___ _ D 4. FACILITIES MANAGEMENT FEE ZONE:. ___ _ - =$~W~ 3cf = $ ::;f'if £ D DIST. #3 __ ) =$ c--: :;;>' UNIT/SO.FT.:. ____ _ X FEE/SO~FT./UNIT:. ___ _ D 5. SEWER FEE PERMIT No. --....--- • -<);Z. EDU's: __ ./ __ _ X FEE/EDU: lf91 =$ lf~r 3-/ BENEAT AREA: p--DRAINAGE BASIN: EDU's: J:? FEE/EDU: / { Olf ds~. _,_ X =$ 0 6. ~EWER LATERAL ($2,500) =$ ----D 7. DRAINAGE FEES PLDA. ___ _ ACRES: _____ _ HIGH /LOW X FEE/AC: =$ ~ _ TOTAL OF ABOVE FEES*:$ ------ *NOTE: This calculation sheet is NOT a complete list of all fees which may be due. Dedicat,ions· and Improvements may also be required with Building Permits. ./ / PLANNINC/ENCINEERINC APPROVALS PERMIT NUMBER CB Q20 I/. l -DATE F· I J /00 ADDRESS __ &-_9-_)_s__ -~-~~_l\_~N-+-1--~-N_t/J_v_L-___ _ .RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL ADDITION MINOR C <$10,000.00) ENGINEER -------- / TENANT IMPROVEMENT PLAZA CAMINO REAL . CARLSBAD COMPANY STORES VILLAGE FAIRE COMPLETE OFFICE BUILDING DATE J~ I 3-CO ------- DATE ------- Carlsbad Fire Department 000008 2560 Orion Way Carlsbad, CA 92008 Fire Prevention (760) 931-2176 Plan Review Requirements Category: Building Plan Reviewed by: Date of Report: 01/18/2000 ------------ Name: C.S.I. General, Inc. Address: 1529 Grand Ave. #A City, State: San Marcos CA 92069 Plan Checker: Job #: 000008 ------- Job Name: Delloitte & Touche Bldg #: CB000121 ------------------Job Address: 2235 Faraday Av Ste. or Bldg. No. P IZI Approved D Approved Subject to D Incomplete Review FD Job# ------ The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and / or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes and standards. Please review carefully all comments attached as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. The item you have submitted for review has been approved subject to the attached conditions. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. Please resubmit to this office the necessary plans and / or specifications required to indicate compliance with applicable codes and standards. The item you have submitted for review is incomplete. At this time, this office cannot adequately conduct a review to determine compliance with the applicable codes and I or standards. Please review carefully all comments attached. Please resubmit the necessary plans and/ or specifications to this office for review and approval. 1st 000008 2nd FD File# 3rd Other Agency ID ·-•":'-. II ANTHONY-TAY LO l{ COMPANIES, INC. DGL01TTf' ~ n,vcl+e, CA~PJA\) Hsz:z_A-~1 tuE L-=-10,3 1 I 4xt2.. Df?t. ti-I L~ 10.; l 4,,(·,2- DFL4t-1 \ Pt..'1'woo () l.8 PSF Jo1srs '3,1 C&"IUN(ii 2-, S" Misc.-. O,lo DL b,O PSf STOe.,~1: LL IZ.~ TL l??~ PS(=" SU-, I OF 4 1-8-co M :: i, ::/?A l ;,3 )(. /0 I 3, 76 z. 2.., 4-t:, I# V 2 1.33 ,,._ I ~3)\ tO,,Yz_ ~ q I I #= V\,}-:= 4 K 13,3 -,. ~?:/'L -it= I I /v/ -z /Gb~ 1#:" V -z (~30 7F M ~ 5583 1-lr V ~ ti 08 tr W--:: [2.5'-t~~l'?3-~ 42-1 lt/1 ;---itJ-.oo San Diego, CA • San Fr:111..::iscu, CA • Hu11stlm, TX It! ()O -/l-_j • ANTHONY-TAYLOR COMPANIES, INC. De1-01 rre i rouci+e: Sl+r 2. Of 4 1-8-00 M t=Z..2.-~tJ tN/E s-s-2>~x: 1'2--: C/07 Ps. 73. 6'2.7 ' 1,s-,,.u 0e,_:::: 8~ Ps~ 30,. ;E:, o, \L, Poon t-JG, i.Ar z /0,5 IC. I ?73/:2--+-14 x 11 .. t-1.5"" x l,·2.-S--< I s-o -= '98+ I Gb+-2.E,l.;; 1147 #f' 1/47 / ,'2.S'" SG!SM1L 2c"1e-4 Stto~-_., t:>1~c·r,o,-1 W-5 : • t~i....( lox 13-3 + f_?<Cfx 12.)-== ZBt..-lt=/1 CWA-t.L.) ¾'' PL-"fWOOD C-0 c-C- 1 ~ f d I\JAI L--> eJ ~4 fr--1 :/2.'' San Diego, CA • San Francisco, CA ~ Houston, TX • ANTHON\T-TAYLOR CONIPANIES, INC. DE LO I TfE'" ~ 100C"-i: SHr .3 OF9 4 1-8-00 Me 2..2.A-1',11 /Je LONG. \)\~Gen o,J (w~t..1.-) U)-_$ z_ , /f:>2.-( {g)( /:,3 ·t-'2,_rxq "-12--) := 475 irt' I ¾G¼'P i?D B,ont S1025 (~ ltJ,) I toot/'I V z. !i"J< 475 z 1..-;75-tr Ft.co£-{},A-~i--\-('-/\G.M ; }14-' 7,evc-r &L-~P r: () 40/z.o IOd. rJAIL-> &rv ~-l/' riN ~l/' p,-.1 IO'' I I ~ ! 1·310~/~ . 6vt=P-Tuf'.-t-.!1i-.1c;;: 12.r;-P&-WA-LL /'10 :. 2..64-o ')(./0:: ~400 i-ff %:1 fe.. '( W OoV f>LOcitG() C-D I C-C-I 8J. ,JAi L'> EN 3 1 ' p,J :,. l2..11 1410#'/ Ui'' >ILL 1:i?. --I-3/g\p /'i' l,5 CA~/\c 1rY I,?~ ;,1.. 0co -:: 7q.g ~ San Diego, CA • San Francisco, CA • !-!Duston, TX [HD6A\ /~col . . ' ~ . II ANTHONY-TAYLOR COMPANIES, INC. SH, 4 oF 4 1-8-oo f.>G'°L01 TfE ~ !OVC\tE Mt;"2.Z.A-rJ1N1= r~,-Jr LAI A-LL. n -z-_3 ,5 x 363 --:..-l, b 7qt; 'J._ -j}/cp A-, f'? s cA-·s1oe Of-" Ooof.- 7 9 8 x ,:z..::. 3,,7,, 'l,9-f-'I -cJ-J o W A-t...t.J.; 4s-o x 1'2.-o ----::: 40.~ i':,2- ~ --,,.,I 7.. _. t--1-;_,t H 0 ~ fbttO >'-i l.5-= 2.°!1 Z..IO 1~ f'v(!) IO,b7 ;< /'f x lt. -:: 17q; f 1,~>:/,t;",cf.~x/50::. 3qoR 57 o t 7<' II ,syz.-~ tooo ,,_ 10.8 &701-h'- f 2 Sou ... ~?? 007' /ff fO ~ 4; bCF( t# (:) I lL--• San Diego, CA • San Francisco, CA • Houstnn, TX .. \ I l/·· . -. fbo f:) . .e. #-cf:::, T&.f ~ B.d --,--n--1-lv~ . . ~ 6~ l)o,.,-el ~ _ -. I• • . 0 -. C(Jov--/2/ .. l SAN DIEGO SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. SOIL ENGINEERING & ENGINEERING GEOLOGY September 30, 1983 Carlsbad Research Center 7330 Engineer Road San Piego, California 92111 Attention: Mr. Michael Dunigan SUBJECT: FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION Carlsbad Research Center, Phase 1 Lot 8, Buildings 1, 2, 3 and 4 Carlsbad, California · Gentlemen: Job No: SD1209-00 Log No: SD3-2739 This report presents the results of our Foundation Investigation for the Carlsbad Research Center, Phase 1, Lot 8, Buildings·l, 2, 3 and 4. Our investigation was performed to provide geotechnical recommendations for the design of commercial building foundations. Our investigation utilized the 30-scale "Plot Plan of Lot 8, Carlsbad Research Center and the Carlsbad Tract 81-10, Carlsbad Research Center, SO-scale Grading Plans, both by Rick Engineering." SCOPE OF SERVICES The scope of services provided for this Foundation Investigation includes: A. Review of in-house plans and reports pertinent to the project (See Appendix A); B. Subsurface exploration consisting of three bucket auger borings to a maximum depth of 20 feet; SUBSIDIARY OF IRVINE CONSUL TING GROUP, INC. 4891 MERCURY STREET• SAN DIEGO, CA 92111 ·2190 • (619) 268-8266 .. .. · Carlsbad Research Center · September 30, 1983 Job No: SD1209-00 Log No: SD3-2739 Page Two c. Logging and sampling of exploratory borings to obtain samples for laboratory testing; D. Laboratory testing of representative fill and bedrock samples obtained during t~e field exploration;- E. Soil engineering analyses of fi~ld_and laboratory data which provides the bases for. our engineering considerations, ~onclusions and recommendations; F. Preparation of this report, including maps and Other graphics, the $um of which presents our findings, co.nclusions and re- commendations. SITE .VESCRIPTION The subject lot is located just south of Faraday Avenue, north of Palomar Airport, as shown on the Location Map, Figure 1. The site is a flat graded lot created by cutting the gentle south- facing slope originally present at the site. The daylight be- tween cut and fill is located just beyond the southern boundary of the site. Access to the site is from El Camino Real, then proceeding west on Faraday Avenue. Previous grading on the sub- ject site was performed under the testing and observation of this firm during 1982 (Reference 4). PROPOSEV VEVELOPMENT Proposed development consists of four single-story tilt-up concrete office-commercial/industrial buildings with adjacent paved parking. Although no detailed structural information was available at the time of this report, we have assumed that column loads will range ::f:." .: ..... _, .. =--~.::..· - ~ .If )-··~ ~ ' \\ <. ) II .,.., ~ - 0 2000 4000 Scale In Feet Adapted from U.8.0.8. San Lula Rey Qu~drangle, 1978 LOCATION MAP JOB NO.: SD 1209-00 DATE: SEPT 19t)3 FIGURE: 1 SAN DIEGO SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Carlsbad Research Center September 30, 1983 Job No: SD1209-00 Log No: SD3-2739 Page Three from 50 to 75 kips and that wall loads will range from 1.5 to 2.0 kips per linear foot (all dead plus live loads). Grading for the site will .involve processing of loose surface soils in the paving areas. Grading may also be necessary to mitigate the expansive potential of the soils, and to provide proper drainage for the site. FIELV EXPLORATION Subsurface conditions were explored by·drilling three large dia- meter borings to a maximum depth of 20 feet. The approximate locations of the borings are· shown on the Plot Plan, Plate 1. The logs of the borings are presented in Appendix ·B, Figures B-2 through B-4. D.rilling, logging and sampling for laboratory testing were con- ducted under the supervision of a geologist. Ring samples were obtained by driving a lined sampling spoon into the soil with a 3400 pound Kelly bar. The blow count for one foot of penetration was recorded and is indicated on the accompanying Logs of Borings. Further description of sampling procedures is included in Appendix B. LABORATORY TESTING Samples representative of the earth materials excavated during our ·field exploration were returned to the laboratory for testing. The testing program consisted of Moisture-D~nsity determinations, Atterberg Limits, Maximum Density determinations, Expansion Tests, R-value, consolidation test, direct shear, and Sulfate Analyses, of ring and bulk samples. ' ' ' Carlsbad Research Center September 30, 1983 Job No: SD1209-00 Log No: SO3-2739 Page Four The soil tests performed on selected ring samples and bulk samples are indicated on the Logs of Borings, Figures B-2 through B-4.. Descriptions of all the laboratory tests performed are presented in Appendix C and -specific laboratory test results are presented in Figures C-1 through C-4. ENGINEERING CONSIVERATIONS A. General Descriptio~ of Soils/Bedrock The Logs of Borings in Appendix B indicate that the predominant material at the subject site is Point Loma Formation. Silty claystone intact bedrock. is generally moist and very stiff to hard. The bedrock-is weathered and fractured near the fill- bedrock contact at the southern boundary of the lot (Plate 1). B. Structural Loads The preliminary structural loads are relatively moderate loads and can be supported by exposed bedrock material. The area of weathered bedrock (Plate 1) appears soft and probably will not accept structural loads without remedial grading. Recom- mendations for remedial grading to mitigate the effect of soft weathered soils on proposed structures are incurred herein. c.· Expansive Soils The results of expansion tests conducted during the course of this investigation indicate that the on-site ~oils have medium to high expansion potential. Expansion of near-surface soils could damage structures and exterior flatwork. Recommendations to mitigate the affect of expansive soils on proposed improve- ments are incurred herein and should be incorporated in project planning and design. ,i .,,. '. ~\ :~: - .. Carlsbad Research Center September 30, 1983 D. Groundwater and Caving Job No: 8D1209-00 Log No: 8D3-2739 Page Five No groundwater or caving was encountered during the course of our exploration. ,. ~;r; .. 1 . Carlsbad Research Center September 30, 1983 CONCLUSIONS ANV RECOMMENVATZONS A. General Job No: SD1209-00 Log No: SO3-2739 Page Six The proposed construction is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint. Conventional spread an~ continuous footings may be utilized to support the strµctural dead and live loads. Two cortstra~nt~ on the propos~d construction are: 1. Resul~s of expansion tests indicate that the on-site bedrock materials have a medium to high expansion portential. 2. Weathered bedrock appears relatively·soft to a depth of approximately l foot. Recommendations to mitigate these constraints are presented below. B. Remedial Grading To mitigate the expansion potentials of the on-site soils and the relatively soft weathered bedrock, remedial grading in the building and parking areas is recommended as follows: 1. Building Areas Three alternative methods of site preparation for building areas are presented below. a. It has been our experience that mitigation of expan- sion potential by presoaking prior to pouring slabs in cut areas Underlain by the Point Loma Formation is very difficult to accomplish. It is, therefore, recommended that an area extending 5 feet beyond the ,. Carlsbad Research Center September 30, 1983 Job No: SD1209-00 Log No: SO3-2739 Page Seven proposed buildings be excavated to a depth_of 3 feet below existing grade, brought to 5 percent above optimum ~oisture content and recompacted to 87 to ·92 percent of the maximum density as determined by ASTM D-1557-78. The recompacted soil should be 4 to 5 percent over optimum moisture immediately prior to placement of concr~te. ~he moisture content should be approved by.the Soils Engineer. ,- b. Supgrade .soils within building 'areas and to 5 feet beyond may be treated with lime.to reduce their expan- sion potential. If this alternative is selected, further analysis should be performed to determine the affect of lime on the on-site soils. Typically, the upper 12 to 24-inches of the slab subgrade soils are treated with 2 to 3 percent lime by dry weight. Lime should be well mixed with the subgrade soils by the use of a Pugrnill mixer or similar equipment. Improper mixing of the lime could adversely affect structures at a later date. c. The expansive potential of the on-site soils may also be mitigated by selective grading. If this alterna- tive is selected, we recommend that the building areas and to 5 feet beyond in each direction be capped with a minimum of 2-1/2 feet of non-expansive (U.B.C. Expan- sion Index less than 20) soils. Prior to placing fill, the exposed subgrade soils should be moisture conditioned, scarified to a depth of 8 to 12-inches and recompacted to a minimum of 90 percent relative compaction. ' f,; Carlsbad Research Center September 30, 1983 Job No: SD1209-00 Log No: SD3-2739 Page Eight . D. 2. Parking Areas It is recommended that subgrade soils be scarified to a depth of 8 to 12-inches, brought to near optimum mois- ture content and compacted to·at least 90 percent relative compaction, prior to placing base. The site should be cleared of any·e~isting vegetation and miscellaneous debris. Fill·soils sould be brought to recom- mended moisture conditions ~nd compacted in 6 to 8-inch thick layers to a minimum of 90 percent of the maximum density, or as specified, based upon ASTM Test Method D-1557-8. Foundation and Slab Recomrriendations The following recomrnenda·tions are preliminary in nature and are subject to verification or revision at the conclusion of precise grading. The results of expansion testing on the existing surficial soils indicates that these soils have medium.to high expansion potential. The following recommendations are empirically derived in con- sideration of expansion potential. These recommendations are considered generally consistent with the Standards of Practice. The potential for favorable foundation performance can be ' further enchanced by maintaining uniform moisture conditions. These preliminary recommendations should be confirmed by expansion testing at the completion of precise grading. Carlsbad Research Center September 30, 1983 Job No: 5D1209-00 Log No: SO3-2739 Page Nine The concrete configurations and reinforcement recommendations herein should not be considered to·preclude more restrictive c~iteria by the governing agenci~s or by structural consi- derations.· A Structural Engineer should evaluate configura- tion and reinforcement requirements ·for structural loadings, shrinkage and temperature stresses. 1. R~~Q~ended Tzye of Founqati9n The recommended type of foundation ·to support dead and live loads is spread footings, either square or continuous. It is recommended that all footings be founded in firm bed- rock or compacted fill as evaluated in the field during con- struction. Footings may be deeper than 18-inches in the area of weathered bedrock shown on Plate l (Buildings 3 a~d 4). a. Columns Columns may be supported on spread footings, a mini- mum of 18-inches below floor slab subgrade. Rein- forcement should be based on structural loading. b. Walls Exterior and interior footings should be continuous and founded at leas{~inches_Jbelow lowest adjacent subgrade. Reinforcement in exterior and interior footings should consist of a minimum of four No. 4 reinforcing pars, placed two at the top and two at the bottom. 2. Floor Slabs Floor slabs should be a minimum of 5-inches thick, rein- forced with No. 3 bars (both directions) at 18-inches ' ~- . '. Carlsbad Research Center September 30, 1983 Job No: SD1209-00 Log No: S03-2739 Page Ten on center located at mi~-height-of the slab. Slabs and footings should.be doweled to~e~her with No. 3 dowels at 36-inches on center. Slabs should be underlain by 4-inches of rounded gravel or clean sand 'and a 6-mil'visqueen mois- ture barrier, plus a minimum of 1-inch of clean sand between the s1~ and visqueen. 3. Exterior Flatwork Provided some -differential movement can be tolerated, exterior slabs on grade (i.e., patios, wal~ways) may be limited to 3.5-inches in thickness and should be reinforced with 6x6-6/6 wire mesh. A 4-inch granular base should be provided below the sl_abs. Al though presoaking is not a requirement, moisture coµtent of optimum or above should be maintained prior to placement of concrete. Slabs should be appropriately jointed for crack control. 4. Allowable Bearing Pressures for Footings The recornrnend~d allowable bearing pressure for spread footing~ is~~~re foot provided the foot1ngs are atleas~d~Jwith a minimum of 18-inches embedment. The allowableoearing pressure may be increased one-third for short term wind or seismic loading. Where located adjacent to utility trenches, footings should extend below a one-to-one plane pro- jected upward from the inside bottom of the trench. 5. Expected Settlement Settlement under the maximum column loads will be less than 0.5-inch. Differential settlement between wall and column loads will be on the order of 0.25-jnch. .1 Carlsbad Research Center September 30, 1983 6~ Lateral Load Resistance Job No: SD1209-00 Log No: SD3-2739 Page Eleven Lateral· loads against buildings may be resisted by fric- tion hetween the bottom of footings and the supporting soils. An allowable friction coefficient of 0.35 is recommended. :Alternatively, an a1·1owable lateral bearing pressure equal to an equival~nt fluid pressure of 300 pounds per square foot per foot of depth t9 a maximum of 1,500 pounds per square foot may be used, provided the footings are poured tight against undisturbed soils. E. Post-1epsioned Slabs As an option to conventional foundations, post-tensioned slabs may be used. Although typically more expensive, post-tensioned slabs have an excellent performance record. 1. Design Criteria Post-tensioned slabs should be designed by a Structural Engineer for an allowable dead plus live load bearing pressure of 750 pounds per square feet. The differential movement recommended for design purposes is a 2 percent gradient in 10 feet horizontal. 2. Subgrade Treatment Post-tensioned slabs should be underlain by a 10-mil moisture barrier with 1-inch of clean sand placed between the slab and moisture barrier. The barrier should be sealed at all splices and care should be taken not to puncture the barrier during construction. 3 •. · Thickened Edge Post-tensioned slabs should have a thickened perimeter edge extending at least 12-inches into the slab subgrade soils. .- ,. ,t . Carlsbad Research-Center September 30, 1983 Job No: SO1209-00 Log No: SO3-2739 Pi:ige Twelve F. fype Ceme·nt for Construction The results of sulfate tests indicate that Type-·V cement may be used for all concrete in contact with subgrade soils. G. Footing Observation All footing e.xcavations should be observed by the Soi-ls Engineer prior to placing reinforcing steel and concrete. H. Pa.veg Areas Pavement sections were determined by the method presented in Flexible Pavement Structural Section Design Guide for California Cities and Counties by California Department-of Transportation, 3rd Edition, January 1979. Based on R-value test results and the assumed traffic index, the following pavement sections are recommended:- Passenger Car Parking (T.I. = 4.0) Truck Loading and Driveways (T.I. = 5.5) 2 1/2-inches of asphaltic concrete on 5-inches of rock base (Type II) or 5 1/2- inches of D.G. 4-inches of asphaltic con- crete on 5'-inches .of rock base (Type II) or 5 1/2- inches of D.G. The upper 8 to 12-inches of sub~rades should be scarified, brought t~ near optimum moisture content, and compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction. Base course should be compacted to at least 95 percent relative compaction. Com- paction should be in accordance with ASTM Test Method D-1557-78. Carlsbad Research Center September 30, 1983 Job No: 8D1209-00 Log No: SD3-2739 Page Thirteen Specifications for aggregate base may be selected from Section 200-2 of "Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction" and should have an R-value.of 78 or more. . . , Specifications for Decomposed Granite (D.G.) may be selected from this reference, Section 400-2.3.2, and should have an R~value of at least 73 and a sand equivalent of at least 30. If practical, selective grading in street areas may be con- sidered for the purpose of reducing pavement section require- ments. If it is considered practical to place.about 1 foot ·of good granular material in s~reet subgrade areas, the re- quired aggregate base material section could be reduced sub- stantially. I. Drainage To enhance-future site performance, it is recommended that all pad drainage should be collected and directed away from pro- posed structures to disposal areas. For ~oil areas, we recommend that a minimum of 2 percent gradient be maintained. Due to the expansive nature of the on-site soils, it is impor- tant that drainage be directed away from foundations and that recommended drainage patterns be established at the -time of fine grading and maintained thro~ghout the life of the struc- tures. Property owners should be made aware that altering drainage patterns, landscaping, the addition of patios, planters, and other improvements, as well as irrigation and variations in seasonal rainfall, all affect subsurface moisture conditions, which in turn affect structural performance within expansive soil areas. Carlsbad Research Center September 30, 1983 J. Trench Backfill Job No: 5D1209-00 Log No: $D3-2739 Page Fourteen It is our opinion that utility trench backfill consisting· of the on-site material types could be b~st placed by mechan- ical compaction to a minimum of 90 percent of the laboratory maximum density. As·an alternative, granular material ($and equivalent greater than 30) may be thoroughly jetted in-place; however, jetting should oniy be considered to apply to trenches no greater than 2 feet in width. Fo~lowing jetting operations, trench backfill should be thoroughly ~nd mechanically compacted and/or wheelrolled from the surface to a minimum of 90 percent of the laboratory maximum density. Exterior trenches extending below a 1:1 projection from the outer edge of foundations sh~uld be mechanically compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of the laboratory maximum density. If utility contractors indicate that it is undesirable to use compaction equipment in close proximity to a buried con- duit, we would recommend the utilization of light-weight mechanical compaction equipment and/or shading of the conduit with clean granular material, which·could be thoroughly jetted in-place above the conduit, prior td initiating mechanical compaction procedures. Other methods of utility trench com- paction may a.lso be appropriate as approved by the Soils Engineer at the time of construction. SUMMARY As foundation and grading plans are completed, they should be for- warded to the Soils Engineer for review for conformance with the intentions of these recommendations. Carlsbad Research Center September 30, 1983 LIMITATIONS OF INVESTIGATION Job No: SD1209-00 Log No: S03-2739 · Page Fifteen Our investigation was performed using the degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under _similar circumstances, by re- putable Soils Engineers and Geologists practicing in this or similar localities. No other warranty, expre·ssed or implied, is made as to the conclusions and professional advice included in this report. The samples taken.and used for-testing and the observations made ~re pelieved representative. of the entire project; however, soil and geologic conditions can vary significantly between borings, and sur_f a·ce outcrops. As in most major projects, con¢iitions revealed by excavation may be at variance with preliminary.findings. If this occurs, the. changed conditions must be evaluated by the Project Soils Engineer and Geologist and designs adjusted as required or alternate designs recommended. Very truly yours, S.:__oIEGO SOILS ENGIN~ERJ?G, ~ ~___q)!$i_ Tara S. Sikh, R.C.E. 35454 Senior .Engineer TSS:MJM:llr INC. Enclosures: Location Map, Figure 1 Plot Plan, Plate 1 Reviewed by: Appendix B -Logs of Borings Appendix C -Laboratory Tests Appendix D -Standard Grading Specifications Distribution: (6) Addressee ' ' • I .;:-t,~:. Ff'.f../t.Ot,.'( /\ '-{a-'()r:;, . . . · 1 ·_ -l·. .: ·. --_ . . . I--· ~r0 r1 t 10l~ Approximate Area of Weathered Surf ace Soils 0 so ·-... f - EXPLANATION + 83 Approximate Location_ . of Boring PLOT PLAN CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER LOT 8, BUILDINGS 1, 2, 3 & 4 CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO ~ SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. __.,7' ~ IOIL [-lll:1!111111 • [11.,IIE[lltlle N:01..0GY JOO 1°209-ool0"~EPTEMBER 83IPLATE Mo.: 1 ·, .. jmFE~NC~S '-;, -· , l. '"Preliminary 'Seil --~a. 'Ge.0'1091..9 ~~ve$.t\-9:~tJ.9nl , C~~lsbad ;~~$earcb Center, .;Qatl$lcl44, c·alif.OlN".l.l.~,-'-'-,:ptE!P'4-teg by ·Woodwatd~C.lycile Con$~ltan,t~, &at~o ~~J>:t .. '.~1 /-. .-1981; .. _ -.... ·, .. . ... -'-_ ~· -:-;,.~_ .>.·.:, _,,_ . -·.: ·, + -,_:~:-t·~-\·-;~--;~---.?!.,-: .;,) .-{~-.: ____ . ' ---~ ~ ~Ad4J;tion1'1. :$'tQd!et, !¢~r'lsb~a le$e~-Jf¢h :~ettt.et,-·1ha$e -x., ·CarlsQad ~ C~l.tfoiJ1-i'a)J~ prep.~~eQ by iWooawat-a:~ClY4e. J;on..-· i$\il tail,ts, &f.'te~ A1-l9'ti.•t ·l.1., ·-1$8;U · ;,,_:. \-._', ';,:,-'{ :-''<,>\· .·:;· · · . ;J~ ~A4den~um :e~-Ad4iti.~tt~+ {Stqdi~_s:,· C~;~'~}>a~·i~~$~a;CJ\ Q.~rt'.~er, . . . ?t>has~ I, °Ca;l~bad1 :taiifo.~nt•.,::.-· _prep4i'.e~ ·'oy .fldQpwa_rd..:ciyde : :¢onsultarit~.,-,4ated $C\!ptember :3#.' _19$1/ .::_.'. '-a_·.: c~· ,' ·• •. ·· .''As-G~ad~d Geote~~ical Report, .. ltough :-Q~tlc;l,i~g ;,Co~pleted, · Carlsbad Research-Centex-,· Pha$e ·1, Car it-bad Tract No. ·81.:.'lo," prepared by .$an 'Diego Solls ,~flginf;!ering, da·ted April 21, 1-982. . . 5. "Foundation investigation., Carlsl:>ad -Res~grch Center, Phase 1, :auildings D, E, F and .G, Lot Numbers 20_, i1, .22, ·23 and 24, Carlsbad, California," by San Diego Soils $ngineering, Inc., dated June 14, 1983. · · •. ~)?P~N:DIX B SUBSURFAG~ EXPtORAT!ON ~e sqbsUt'f ace e~plc;:rrat.ion ~c>nsi:$ted of :8 · borings thrilled to a llJaximwn (leptb of 25 .:f ee.t. ·togs Qf Borings are presented 'herein .~$ .f:i,.gut'ei;; B~~ tf\r9~·gh li~4.'· ~-expl~·tiatit)h :Ot' J,ogs t>f ~Q;rings . -. ' -. ' : ' ' . . -,, . . ' ' ~ - , ,te.,tm-inol.ogy j,s · ·pre$~11ted iit figur~. -B-i. · •;;'!;::·-~ -"" • • r • ~-> -"( • , • . ~;.;_ -~ .. " i .• , ' : ' . . ,:' ::\ ~-: . . . :: .··,:-' > ,. , . . . . :~ .:: , : ·.Pal:l.~ornia san,tplE!r ~fii$tci:PCe bJow ~ou;nts we.re ·obt~i:n.e9 .t,y · -;, · ·r~t;:·>' ·:··:~ '. ·,d~ivi~~ _,a_ .2~'625~iii~~\'.:t,~-~~-~ \~~J?lt~':wit:h a_· 13/~00 :pouna -~~-rturi~~ . . .1%;(:·: -.-4ro,Pping 1:h~ougJl.· ~ .t-~-:-in9h . !tee /f~ll. The ~~l.o~s .per -~oot te~qrded . }./ "· .· Qn .:the· t~cogs -oi ;)301;tri~~ ::~e~tE;?.ser1t···,~ta number·-·qf :blQW$ ·tllat· wete ff: . --. : . ·-_ . -. . ._ .'. -.. ··: -\ ·, :_ . ' t .· t-Eq1,1ired ·tQ dri,te l;Ji\'.t~Jer ,U'-iilclies. k~· ,. '.,( C · Bor·j.ng ·log notation ~o;r ,t:h.e C~lifornia sampler :is lndiqated ·}·--· ·:below: California Sampler ,' . ·--_,. , . .,,;,_ ... ' !!I &l· 0 :~ I I PHIMARY DIVISIONS .....,, ~v, .. H SYMBPI, SECONDARY DIVISIONS I s 12 j. -~i ~ jl; C -,-i. w t· ". ·, ---.. GRAVELS Cl.[AN CiAAVlLS MOR£ THAN HALF <LESS lHAN OF COAASl 5% FINES> FRACTION tS (iAAvtl. LARGER THAN WITH NO. 4 SIEVE FINES SANDS CI.EAN SANOS MORE THAN HAI.F (USS THAN OF <;OARSE 5"· FINES>· FRACTION 1$ $ANOS ~MALI.ER "THAN WITH ·NO. 4 $t£V& -flNES . . ... $iLTS ANO ·c,..AVS ~~IQUIO LIMIT IS 'l;E$$ THAN$0%. , ... ', StLTS ANP ·Q.Avs :1.JQUIO ~IMIT, -IS GA£ATER ·THAN -~ ---. HIGHLY ()RGANIC SOILS GW GP GM GC SW SP SM . ' SC :Ml c .. OL MH Pt : .. '-"ell gr~ded g,.a..,~,, gi~-,:l•Wir,d nu•tucc:, hllie o, no fines . Pooily ~ad..-d g,,,.e11 Of g,het-wnc, m1a1u,es. a.we cw no fines. Well g,aded unds, 9'.,,.u'f Undt. t,ute o, no f~. ... . . ---·· Silly Nncta. sand-sill miilaur--. f'li:ln•plas1ic ,.,.._-, ... .. . ... .. «;taycy ~-~;.cl~ ffl'llli,in,. .,. •• ,ie ti,.... _, . . . . . ,.. ' . ~ ---··-. . . . . . _ ~;~ ~111 at.Id or~ Silt~ ~-pt _low pi•s,ticiay. ln9rganic sitts.'mie~~~ '"6 dial~'""' ~y .-S/l!v '911•. el,sJ,c '*' . . . . . . ..... -. . . . . . --.•• ,. ,.. .. , - :~eat and ~n~ ~.i;hly Ofi)at'I~-joi!·~ .. . .. --' PEFINITiON OF T~RMS 1,1S. STANDARD SERIES SIEVE CLEAR SOUARE SIEVE OPENINGS 40 ~ 4 -~·-1•. 12• SAND GRAVEL SILTS AND CLAYS .,__----.1------------+-------1 COBBLES BOULDERS ·FINE ·t MEDIUM COARSE FINE I. COARSE GRAIN SIZES SAN0S,GRAvaS At,£ BlO'NS/FOOT t CLAYS ANO STRENGTH• BLOWS/FOOT t · NON-PLASTIC SILTS PLASTIC SILTS JOB NO.: VERY LOOSE 0-4 VERY SOFT 0 -1/4 0 -2 LOOSE 4 • 10 SOFT 1/4 -1/2 2 -4 FIRM 112 -' 4 -• MfDIUM DENSE 10 -30 STIFF 1 • 2 8 -18 DENSE 30 -50 VERY STIFF 2 -• 11 -lZ VERY DENSE CMRSO HARD OVER 4 CMR32 RELATIVE DENSITY CONSISTENCY •Number of blows of 1,0 pound hammer fall,ng 30 inches 10 drive 1 2 inch 0 0. (l•l/1 inch I.OJ 1Plil spoon CASTM 0-1586>. 4U,conf,ned compressive strength in tons/sq. h n determined by l1bora1ory testing Of lPQfoaim.:ed by the stand,rd penetration test CASTM D-1586>. pocllel penetrometer. to,v1ne. or vi1Uat observ11ion. KEY TO EXPLORATORY BORING LOGS Unified· Soil Classification System (ASTM D-2487) SO1196-00 JUNE. 1983 FIGURE: B-1 SAN DlfAO ~Oil~ FNGINEERING. INC. ' ' - DATE OBSERVED: LOGGED BY: KS z ... Q p o· . j: 0 w w 0 mw w ii( LL. y II,. a:...1 -..... 00.. IL. Cl') ... ~ ,: -~ !l< ... Cl') 0.. Cl') 0 : e0 w C ..., .Q ~-m :s -o .,. 8/ -CL 10" ·"' ' .,; ., .,. 10-,,.: ·8/: : JJ.; ri .J"f. r '· , .. .i ·1.5-- ., ,. 20- -- - - 25- - - -. 30- . . - 36- . . . . 40- . 8/ 9" 9/7/83 METHOD OF DRILLING: 24" Bucket Auger w ..., 0.. :I C 0) ~ ..., :::, m Kelly Bar Weight 3400 Lbs. GROUND Et,EVATION: F.G. LOCATION: see Map >1': ·i a:o SORING NO . w_ Do.. a:._ =>z w-o> t-w ~ ... ct- Oz Ef :10 QESCRIPTION ~~ c.> ·- i lS lJ.l ~EDRQCK: Point Ii<;>ma Fo~tion: Olive- . . J:?rown sitty ~YSTONE, moist, very stiff, ble¢.ky, ·-massive, small C;JYPSum seams ' 20 10~' l,6 112 . •,•' Grey-hl.ac~ ·$,i'.l,:1;.y. C:J;.AYSTONE, 1ll0i$t, hard Very ha,r~ drilling Total Depth 18' No Water No caving SOIL TEST· Maxiinµm Density Atterberg ~arision CO!}SOl~dation JOB NO.: 1209-00 LOG OF BORING TFIGURE: B-2 SAN DIEGO SOILS ENGINEERING. INC. ' - l' ~-1\. -· ,. DATE OBSERVED: 9/7/83 METHOD OF DRILLING: 24" Bucket Auger Kelly Bar Weight 3400 Lbs. LOGGED BY: KS z 0 p 0 ... 0 w w "ij w 0 ID w I&. (,) I&. a: -' ,_ ~ ... :::) Q. % (I.) ... :E ... ii t !l < G. Cl) 0 00 ~ C .J z "rl m :::) :1-(> . ... . , Cl,· 6 --~ &-'' :{ . 6 ' . l -· ;, : -·\ ' _, to---: ' ·~ -,8 , .. . --~ .. · .. : .-.,. ' :15- •' ~ ·- --. 20 ... ... -- 25- - - -- 30- - -- • 35- -- . - 40- JOB NO.: 1209-00 w .J Q. :E 4( (I.) ~ .J :::) m GROUND ELEVATION: F • G. LOCATION: See Map BORING NO. 2 DESCRIPTION WEJATHERED.~E;DJ;lOCK: Point µ,ma Formatio11 SOIL TEST 14 114 :BEDROCK: PQint to:ma Foxination1 Olive-D~rect Shea~ J:i,:own $ilty OLAYSTONE, · moist, ·very 20: l07 l~ 108 19 108 ·. stiff, ~ssive, blocky Total Depth 20' No Water LOG OF BORING ,~tt,erb¢rg '.Expansion jFIGURE: B-3 SAN DIEGO SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. ' .. DATE OBSERVE0; __ 9 __ /_?"-/_S_3 ____ 1 __ METHOD OF 0DRILLING: 24" Bucket A_uger Kelly Bar Weight 3400 Lbs. LOGGED BY: KS GROUND ELEVATION: F • G • LOCATION: See Map z ... 0 ~ii:' ~ 0 w -w ~ -0 w _, wait 00 BORING NO. 3 w 0 mw A. a:-2 . 0.. &&. 2 Lt. a:_, ::,t-w--.... :>A. C ..,z o> z IL. 0) t-2 0) o,W <!:: ... ·o; ~ ~..: -t-~ oz -'"' ,o., = 0 .00> O..z DESCRIPTION w ... z ::, 20 zW 0 rl m ::a m () -0 ~o . ~. ~EDROCK: Point Loma Formation; Qlive- /. t·, : ~ -brown s.il1;y C:t,AYSTONE, moist, very ', ., CL ) _i,, stiff, ~ss_ive, blocky, with gypsum .. .,._ -se.ams fS . .: ' J~.' ,. . ·1 ~r---. ---~ /~ .·, ~ .'; ,v,..,;. ·,'t,,· --,.,t,--+--+-+-----t--.......,,.:1-....... -----...,.._...,.,.....· ---,-,....:--------------··.,...------.....----1 ! ' ~-, ., -., . . 't~-.. . • .: - 20-:- -. . . 26- . . . . 30- . . . 35- . - 40- ' ·Total . ~p_th ,io' No Water No caving SOIL TEST .Atterberg ~ansion $ulfate R-Val~e !FIGURE: B-:4 ' JOB NO.: 1209-00 LOG OF BORING SAN DIEGO SOILS ENGINEERING. INC. .. • ' . , ... /:. A. B •. APPENDIX C LABORATORY TESTING ~ndex Tests Moisture conten.t and dry c:lensity dete:pninat,i.ons were m~de for most ring samples. ~ef?ul1;:s of mo;i.$ture-density deter-· .. mination$ are shown on the t,ogs of :Sorjngs, included in Appendix B of tl:d.s .repqrt •. Re$ult$ ~f At,.te~ber.g .. ~imit$, consisting Qf both liquid · litn;it and p,:i~stic liIJli.t analfses, are ,p.lotted on the . · Piasticity -Chai::t 4n .. Fi9'Ure ·c-l. Atterberg Limits ,ere _per- formed in accordan¢.e ·-wi-th A~TM: p 423-72. Consolidation tests were performed on bedrock ring samples. Water was added to the apparatus at the load indicated on the consolidation curves. The consolidation test results are presented on Figure C-2. C. Direct Shear Tests Direct shear strength tests were performed on selected relatively undisturbed ring samples. To simulate field conditions, the samples were tested under a normal load approximately equal to the in situ effective normal load. The test results are presented on Figure C-3 and performed in accordance with ASTM: D 3080-72. D. Maximum Density/Optimum Moisture Content The ·maximum dry density/optimum moisture content relation- ship was determined for typical samples of the on-site . ..,_ .. -~ -:.~ j' ·;,<- ,, . ·- • . "· soils. The laboratory standard used was ASTM: D 1557-78. The test r~sults are swnmarize9 on Table 1, Figure C-4. -.E.-~x.ea-n,sion E~pansic;m tests we;re p~rformed ·on repi::esentative samples .pf the. on-site soils .remolded and tested under a surcnar~e of 1.44 pc;>unds ·per sqqare_foot in accora~nce with the Uniform l3t;iilcling Code Stan9az.:¢i ·No. J9-2. The -te$t results .are "S'Um- ma:r;ized on Ta:bl.e .2, ~i-gJte · c--_4. " ~uitate :"+'e$_'t;:s Sulf~tte t~st·_ results' ~'l'.'e sl.II[iJna1:ized i·n Table 3, Figure d-4. G. · ~~Vplue An R-value test was perfopned on representative samples of -·· the on-site surface soils to provide data for pavement design. The test·results are summarized in Table 4, Figure C-4. tt ... .,,. __ ~ .... -.· ·i· ··.:.-.-.· •,.•,/ ...... · ~ '·::~.:· ... :···=·''· ··· ... .-::·~-;:\ - "!' ....... ') " -. ·,.:, .. , .. ·-· .. \f.~) ' '-;:l-· -; -»· ·--,;-·-~,.,_- • v. :',t ,: ' t~l_ J;~~:.J~~' 'f-il·: '. :~ ' PLASTICITY CHART :i·-: .·-.. '0,o . -:1c>" · · jto ·:,ao .-· · : ~o jo eo -70 ·80 10 .LIQUil;) LIMl·T on .,., ., ;,; :·:; -NATURAL -PLAS-PA·SSING · Uf!IIFIEb SAMPLE LI.QUID L•OVlOITY ·SOIL SYMBOL BO_RING -DEPTH -WATER a.1MIT TICITY NO.200 l"PEX CLASSI-HO. (FEET). G.QN"l'ENT (~) INDEX SIEVE uu FICATION c;o (10 UU SYMBOL 0 B-1 2 44 19 CL B-2 5 45 26 CL [J B-3 3 44 25 CL ATTERBERG LIMITS LOB NO.: 1209-00 IDATE: SEPTEMBER, 1983 FIGURE: C-1 SAN DIEGO SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. . "-- • .• -------------------------------------------• BORING NO. DEPTH (FEET) SYMBOL EXPLANATION 8-1 ·: ... ·. o. 1.0 · i.o a.o -.4.0 V z 0 5 &.O e ,.., 0 ct, z 8.0 0 0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.08 .... .g CII JOB NO.: 1209-oo I 5 0 FIELD MOISTVRE -..,.;.--------SAMPLE SATURATED REBOUND . ' _t:\.. ~-.,. .. .. ' "':: :: .. 0 0 0 0 0 0 C') ... 10 0 0 0 0 0 g 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 s .... ('4 C') ~ IO NORMAL LOAD (PSF) LOAD CONSOLIDATION TEST 0 0 0 g 0 g g §§ 0 ('4 (') FIGURE: g I c-2 SAN DIEGO SOILS ENGINEERING. INC. ., , . • -., ,_ ~" -. " " tt;· -~: . :: . -~--·. .. .. ~ co Q. --:c .... C, z l--s_o..;.:~b:;,;:.~_G--t----f:.;./_l:.:;;l~il:....,+-c-o.:.:n,..::~::.:SF>..:.1o_N_,+:t:..:R.:.;N·~t..;.~.;.;f o;.;~.;;:~_;----"""'S_A __ M_P_L_E_D_E_S_C_R_l;,;;..P..a.T.,;,.;10:..:N~----t a-2 2 400 25 Undisturbed (CL) 40001--~...;;.-..&--,-----L-...;;._;,....;__..__ __ -,--L.. ___ _,. ___ ..;.,_.......;.."T"'"" ____ --I JOQ01--------....,_ _____ ,.....ji,,......---,.--------+---.;;-,.o_,,.--+------......,.------1 ' ' ~ .-:- _:1000 -·iooo. ·-aooo· ---, ·-· --4000 ·oooo ·eooo NORMAL :LOAD (PSF) --" '. ----_, -- IORING . DEPTH • 'COHE.iON~ 'ANGLE OF .. , -.. SAMPLE DESCRIPTION ,NO. (FEETI . __ (ps·--FRICTION.0 ,----__ , " 400 0 ----, -- 3000 I 2000 ... co C, ~ ~ w % co 1000 0 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 600 0 · NORMAL LOAD (PSF) -. _ _..._, JOB NO.: 1209-00 SHEARING STRENGTH TEST FIGURE: C-) SAN DIEGO SOILS ENGIN~ERING, INC. ~·i.: ' ~--~ .";;.: -;:;1 < .µ .· .. J ~ ',.' .... ·:: · TABLE l MAXIMUM DENSITY/OPTIMUM MOISTURE RELATIONSHIP (ASTM: D 1557-78) Test· Location ·. -B-1· @ i· ·-Maximum Optimum Dry Dens·ity ~oisture (pof) -Content % -. l,0_6.0 -.. --. ' -· - .. -TABLE 2· . $fi;SULT$ ¢F $XPANSibN:-'1'~$T$ : .{ti .. ~.c~· Method 'l41 _:psf) ·21.0· , .... -' -· ,. -· --: ' . ' -.. ' · ·->rest .\toc~tiQn .:a--1 @ 2 I · B-2 -@-·5' B-3 -@ 3' -E:~pansion l.11-dex · 64 92 75 TABLE 3 RESULTS OF SULFATE TEST Test % Soluble Location Sulfate B-3@ 3' 0.31 TABLE 4 RESULTS OF R-VALUE TEST Test Location R-Value B-3@ 3' 23 :EX,t>a-n~ion · · ~ot,enti~l '·---, • + :-.:·. ·" ,,');:>.~-:-. ' ,--\' ·t.tedium ·. · Hi.-gh Mediµm Job No: 1209-00 Date: SEPTEMBER, 1983 Figure: C-4 ii 0}/10/2000 12:31 175~7 358578 STUEVEN ENGH·'c-ERING PAGE 01 -. TITLE 24.REPORT Title 24 Report for: Deliotte & Touche 2235 Faraday Avenue, P & Q Carlsbad, CA Project Designer: C.S.I. General, Inc. 1529 Grand Ave., Suite A San Marcos, CA 92069 (760) 471-9388 Report Prepared By: t ~ Steve Balderrama, CEPE ' \~ Stueven Engineering Consultants-~ 425 W. 5th Ave. Suite 103 . Escondido, CA 92025 \ . (760) 735.9577 Job Number: Date: 01/10/2000 . Toe EnergyPro comJ)lhl' prognam hu boon Ut6d to perform lhl calculatlo!ls aummll'W!d In thlt complltlll)I) report This program hn appnMII and II authorized by lhe CaNfornlti Energy Commlnion for UN With bOth tho Rnldantlal and Ncnrcsldentlal 1996 5ulldlng Eiwgy Etflclency Sblnmrdl. Thia program dov'llo!)od by Ge.I Oodd/EMl'gySoft, LLC (41~ ~. 2.0 BvEneravSoft Jol;t Ntmber. U... Nun'lbwr. 3429 01/10/2000 12:31 1750,~58578 Cover Page Table of Contents STUEVEN ENGn1c:-rnrNG TABLE OF CONTENTS Nonresidential Performance Title 24 Forms Form ENV-MM Envelope Mandatory Measures Form L TG-MM Lighting Mandatory Measures Form MECH-MM Mechanical Mandatory Measures _ EntrCVPro 2,1) &,' PAGE 02 1 2. 3 12 13 14 0.1/10/2000 12:31 176073B"C::78 STUE\/Hl ENGINEEPT"JG PAGE 03 IPERFORMANCE CERTIFICATE OF COM~LIANCE Part 1 of 3 PERF-11 PROJECT NAME Deliotte & Touche PROJECT ADORE$$ 2235 F arada Avenue, P & Q Carlsbad .. PRINCIPAL DEStGNER -ENVELOPE C.S.I. General, Inc. OOCUMeNTATION AUTHOR Stueven en· ineerln ConsultantlJ T!U!PHON! 760 471-9388 TELEPHONE 760 735-8577 6438q.ft. _ DATf 01/10/2000 -~.> f BUILDING TYPE !Kl NONRESIDENTIAL D HIGH RISE RESIDENTIAL D HOTEL/MOTEL GUEST ROOM PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION D NEW CONSTRUCTION IX] ADOmON D A1. TERATION D EXISTING+ ADDmON STATEMENT OF CO This Certificate ot Compliance lists the building foaturea and performance specifications needed to comply with Title 24, Parts 1 - and 6, of the State Building Code. This ·certificate applle$ only to a Bui using the performance compllance approach. The Principal Designers hereby certify that the proposed building design represented in the construction document& and modelled for this permit application are consistent with all other forms and worksheew, specifications, and other calculations ubmltted with thla permit application. The proposed bUildlng as des{gned meets the energy efficiency requlrementii of the State Building Code, Title 24, Part 6. ENV. LTO. MECH. _ O O D 1. I hereby affirm that I ~m eligible under the provlslona of Division 3 of the Business and ProfeS$1ons Code to a,gn this document as the pem>n responsible for Its preparation; and that l am licensed aa a civil engineer, mechanl.cal engineer, electrical engineer or architect. EJ 0 ltJ 2. I affirm that I am eligible under the exemption to Olvi8lon 3 of the eusineu and Professions Code by Section 5537.2 of the Business and Prof~ona Code to sign this document as the person re&p0nalble for Its preparation; and that I am ~ licen'8d contractor preparing documents for work that I have contracted to perform. 0 D D 3. I affirm that I am eligible under the exemption to Division 3 of the Busln88e and Professions Code by -Section......--,,--.,,. of the--,.,--......-_,,.,..-._.-,---Code to sign this document as the person retSponslbie for lt8 preparation; and for the followlng reason: ___________ . Indicate location on plans of Note Block for Mandatory Measures 1--------------~---t Required Forms ENV-1 Indicate location on plans of Note Block for Mandatory Measur88 I------~------------; Required Forms L TG-1 DATI! 1/ro Co Indicate location on plans of Note Block for Mandatory Measures 1----------~---------1 PRINCIPAL MECHANICAL DESIGNER -NAME C5{ 6-ei-,, J ..... ~- MECH-1 . .. BYD Initiation IiID!i ~j/10/00 11 :31 ;00 ~iiii Code: ~~532§60 ::;3!l(16 ~1/10/2000 12:31 175073~",78 STUEVEN ENGH-lEEP-Tt~G PAGE 04 (~ERFORMANCE~~ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE Part 2 of 3 PERF-j · f Deliotte & Touche ENERGY COMPONENT Space Heating Space Cooling lndoorF,ims Heat Rejection· Pumps Ootnestlc Hot Water Lighting Receptacle Process TOTALS: 4.20 83.132 33.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 47.12 18.!IO 0.00 166.16 PropoHd Design 4.20 5CU5 3<4.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 38.26 16.80 0.00 0.00 7.47 -1.-40 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.~ 0.00 0.00 Building Orientation 1----==<-.:::-=-1 Conditioned Floor Area Number of Stories 1 Unconditioned Floor Area --------, Number of Systems 1------~-1 Conditionec:! Footprint Area §aqft. aqft. aqft. Number of Zones 1 Omntatlon .2muAm glnl~AIU 9l~!og B!tIR Front Elevation (North Otqft. 0 tqll, O.O'll, Leff Eh.wation (ENt 0 sqft. 0 sqft. 0.0% Rear Elevation (Soutt, 2-40 aqft. 100 sqfl. 41.7¥. Right Elevation (Ww. . 0 sqft. 0 sqft. o:OOA. Total 2'40 aqft. 100 lqlt, 4'-7% Roof I M51aq!I. I ollqft. I O.O'lf,I Standa!Jt fl:2i!Q.Ad Lighting Power Density ~w~ 1.302 W/aqft. Prescriptive Env. Heat Loss 246 Prescriptive Env. Heat Gain 039 16701 Rema 1: Run Initiation T 1:31·00 2.0 ~ P:nergyScft llMr N\lmbltr: ~~ JcbNumber: :4d1S • T ,, ' > ,• ' , •• • ,, 0 ,• > • • 0 ' ~ . -' . ' ·.· · PO R . · U LI ··I ·I\} .. l~ (:,·,.1 · ~~ y§T :%i ,:;; ~ } . . -~-, . , t· < ,. ,e 01/10/2000 12:31 1 76073!"'"'"i78 STUEVEN ENGINEEPT"-JG PAGE 05 IPERFORMANCE qERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE -.. Part 3 of 3 PERF-11 PROJECT NAME DATI! Deliotte & Touche 01/10/2000 . ZONE INFORMATION Zone1 T Room Notes: 1. SN LT(M (Hema marbd with uterlat, -LTG-2 by Olh«s) 2.S80$LTG-3 3.SNLTCM the adctquacy of the Jultlflcatlon, Ind m.y .-.JKt a bulSdlng or design thM otMl'WI~ compllu bated on the adequacy of the "'*='•' luttlflcatton •nd dOcUIIWfitatlon M.lbmlf:ted. Plan I fl&id The axc•ptlonal futuru listed In thla peffonnanc.e approach applic.tlon Mv• tp,ttlflcally bffn rtvlewed. .Adequate wrttt.n Justlflcatlon and docU1T111ntatk>n for their UN have bHn provided by the appl~ Authorized Signature w Stamp ____________ _ '1lg<,:~ ol 115 @1/10/2000 12:31 STUEVEN ENGINEEP--· 1G PAGE 06 l~NVELOPE COMPLIANCE SUMMARY Performance ENV-11 IPROJ!CT NAMI! _ Deliotte & Touche IDA~1/10/2000 I OPAQUE BUR '"ACES Solar Surface Framing Act. Gains # Type Type Area U.Val. Alm. Tilt YIN Fonn 3 Reference Location / Comments 1 Wllll iu...... 120 07"-" 180 go X le--Wall Tralnlna Rnnm 2 lrw-.r '-1,v.,. 20 n.581 180 go y Hollow Mml Door . T~nlna Rnnrn 3 Roof WQOd 843 0.0-43 0 0 !X R-10onA~lll9 Tralnlno Room FE NESTRATlc.. 1N SU~F .DI ,. Ill. Act. # Type Area U..Val. Azm. SHGC Glazing Type Location/ Comments 1 Window 1M 1?M. 1M OJSl!I Slnalit Mtl Tint~ O.r.Ul lrralnlna Room EXTERIOR SHADING Window Overhang L•ft Fin Right Fin # Exterior Shade Type SHGC Hot. Wd. I ,a,,n Mnt I S:vt Rlfvt niut t .on. Hat. Dist. I An Unt 1 None 0.78 Run ... ..... Time: 0111010011'.31-nn Run ~ .... ti•• DA.71i32&SO EnergyPro 2.0 &IE~ IJNr N\lmber: 3429 Joo NUml>lr: Pago;Sof 15 01/10/2000 12:31 STUE\lEN ENGINEEJ:"'~"lG PAGE 07 ILIGHTING COMPLIANCE SUMMARY !PROJECT NAME Deliotte & Touche LUMINAIRI! Code DHCRIPTJON 4 ft Fluorascant T8 CONTROL l-OCATION (Room#) CONTROL LOCATION (Room# or Dwg. #) CONTROi. IDENTIFICATION CONTROL IDENTIFICATION CONTROi,. TYPE (Auto Time Swttcb, Exterior, etc.) BALLASTS Performance L TG-1f IDA01,1012000 Paga Total I ~Totall bu control Cntdlt WllltS I (From L T0-3)_ Adjuat-.d Actual Watts I Total Watts 1137 8371 ;;1 o] SPACE CONTttOUJ:D Pag<l:7d15 Bt/10/2800 12:31 STUEVEl'I El'IGINEEr,.t-.JG PAGE 08 .. {CERTIFICATE OF.COMPLIANCE Performance MECH-1f PROJECT NAME Deliotte & Touche DATE 01/10/2000 I ··l._ __ -=-------'----,-J MECHANICAL SYSTEMS .__lsv_s_TEM_NAM_I!_. ____ __._ _ ~1 11 I~'-----~ TIME CONTROL SETBACK CONTROL ISOLATION ZONES HEAT PUMP THERMOSTAT? ELECTRIC HEAT? FAN CONTROL VAV MINIMUM POSITION CONTROL? SIMULTANEOUS I-EAT/COOL? OUTDOOR DAMPER CONTROL ECONOMIZER TYPE DESIGN AIR OFM MECH-3 COLUMN I HEATING EQUIPMENT TYP! HEATING EQUIPMENT EFFICIENCY COOLING EQUIPMENT TYP1ii nl• v .. O.OW/ Conttant Volume No- Auto NoEoonomlzw 3220fm COOLING EQUIPMENT EFFICIENCY 10.2 SEER/ g,6 EER MAKE AND MOOEL NUMBER HEATING DUCT LOCATION R-VALUE Oucta In Altlc 4.2 COOUNG DUCT LOCATION R-VALUI! Ducts In Attic -4.2 DUCT TAPE ALLOWED? Yn P1Pl!! TVP!! (SUPPLY, RETURN, ETC,) PIPE INSULATION REQUIRED? Yn I CODE TABI..ES: ~nttr cO(k from~~ Into CQfwnn1 above. HEAT PUMP THERMOSTAT? TIME CONTROL 8!TSACK CrnL l$0LATION ZONES S:Prog.Swltch H:HMtlng Enttr N...,..,_, of ELECTRIC HEAT? o:~y C:Coollns, Isolation Zonu. VAY MINIMUM POSITION CONTROL? S.,,sor B: Bolh Y;Y•• M: Manual Tlmff SIMULTANEOUS HEAT/ COO'-? N:No HEAT AND COOL SUPPLY RESET? VENTILATION OUTDOOR DAMPER ECONOMIZER A:Auto A:Alr B:AlrBalanc:. HIGH EFFICIENCY? C: Outside /jJ,r C.rt. G:Grtvlty W:Water DUCT TAPE AU.OWB>? M: out. Air~ .. ...,. N: Not R.ciulred D: Dtmand Control PtPf: INSULATION REQUIRED? N:Nlltllral FAN CONTROL I: lnlat Variu P:V~Pltch V:VFD 0:00-.. c: Curve O.A.CFM Ent11r Outdoor Ak CFM. Nott: Thla lfNIII ba nc leU than Col. H on MECH_,. I 01/10/2000 12:31 1 75,. -':i58578 STUEVEN ENGJ' '-1::RING PAGE 09 !MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SUMMARY IPROJECTNAMI! ~~li~tte & Touche Part 1 of 2 MECH-2 I l0A'"b1,1012000· ·I l~IJII I c~ Aiun ..... , ... cl'l li:tl ·-----'.T DI ~- Tot Motor 0,1 .... Pump EaulDfflllnt Name EqulDn*'lt Tvoe Qtv. !fflclencv TOM Oh, OPM BHP Eff. l!ff. Control [nU\AI J Dt"lll 1;11 uUUU.S.RY Energy Factor Standby· fAtJI<' INSLII ~ttld Vol. orRecov•ry Louor ExL Sy1temName SyatamType Dlatrlbtltlon Type 10h lnoot (Q•I•.) Efflclllf!CV PIiot R-Val. CENTRAL SYSTl:M R4TINr.t~ HEATING COOUNO Alut. $Y1Jtffll Name Sv•twnT-lctv. n,rtn,,t kW Eff. O\ltnut Sen•lbl• EtflclfilCY Economlur TYf>11 RHEEM RJKA-A036C Pl!Cbgtd Heal Pump 1 37,000 0.0 6.8HSPF '3C$ I 00() 25,200 ~ 0.2 SEER/ 11.15 EER Ne Economtzlll" - Cl:NTRAL SYSTEM FAN SUMMARY ~IIPPI I S:4N RF1nJR ll S: .flN Motor Drlva Motor Drlv. SvstemName FanT.,,... Motor Location CFM BHP Eff. Eff. CFM BHP Eff. Eff. RHEEM RJKA-A036C -,,. Volume aiow-Torouah 1,400 0.50 n.o,, 100.0% none ~~n 1n1tJat1011-ttroe; 0111oioo 11;31;00 Run code; 947532660 Pagtr:lld15 0111012000 12:31 STUEVEM EM(?~' 1f::ERIMG PAGE 10 IMECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SUMMARY Part 2 of 2 MECH-21 PROJl!CT NAM!! IDA1'11110/2000 Daliotte & Touche ZONE TERMINAL SUMMARY VJI U I , ..... ,-. ,-S:AIII ~-''\Ku Mln.CFM fWIMtCol Flow M<itot Driv• 7.-....Nanla Sv.tamTvae otv. Ratio T~ o.ttaT Ratio CFM BHP Err. Eff, Type output EXHAUST FAN SUMMARY FAN ,._~ Motor Drive Motot Drive RoamN.wne Otv, CFM BHP Eff. Eff. RoomNane Qtv. CFM BHP Eff, !rt. Run lnltllltlnn Time~ 01/10/nD 11'.31•00 Run Code• 947532660 Energyt,ro 2,0 19\t l!nercrvScft UNr Numbtlr: <14211 JotlN\lmbitr: f>atw.10 ol' 15 01/10/2000 12:31 1 T 7 358578 IMECHANICAL VENTILATION f PROJECT NAME l Deliotte & Touche lt,;e¢AA&l¢AL veNfiLAfioR AREABA.SJS COHO. MIN. ZONE/SYSTEM AREA CFM. CFM (SFJ PERSF (B lt c, Training ROQffl 6«! 0.50 322 Zone 1 .. STUEVEN ENC-·~· ''::ERING -: err: H OCCUPANCY BASIS REQ'D NO. CFM MIN. O.A. OF PER CFM (MAX OF Pl!!OPU! PER!30N (!xF) DORO) 322 Total 322 PAGE 11 MECH·31 IDAT! I 01/10/2000 [i] Q] -DESIGN uvll.lUUN VAV tfRANS AIR MIN, FER Ct:M RATIO AIR --322 - 322 - ---,___ -- - i--- ~ -- - - -- - -~ - - - - - - e-'---- i---- ~ Baled on E>-.peet4MI Numbll'of Oocupants Of Ill i.ut tSO'I!.of~101QQ.4 UBC Oec;upant Density. • ; -\r-ROie "' .....,. 121 , T Ible 1.f. Must be gnmer than or 11qoal to H, or UM Tnanafer Air. Design OutdOOr Air CFM lnclUdl:9 vcntllutiol'l frorn Supply Air Syvtem & Room Exhaust FM1. ~ ~ grtalerthln or llqUII to (H minus I). . : :: : : Job Number! ,1 •I -., 01/10/2000 12:31 17 '358578 STUEVEN ENr· ''::ERING lcNVELOPE MANDATORY ·MEASURES !PROJECT NAME . Peliotte & Touche DESCRIPTION 0 f 118(a) lnatall.cf Insulating Mahlrlal ahall hav• bMl'I c«tlnltd by ~ mll'!Ufacturer to eomply with the California Quality Standards for Insulating malarial, Tltl1t 20, 01-)apt.r 4, Ar1lcl• ,. D I 118(c) All Insulating Materials shall ba Installed In compliance with the flama •Pl•d rating and •mok• dltn1lty niqulrltfflllnta of Section& 2802 and 707 of Tltl1t 2.-, Part 2. D f 111(1) All Exterior Jolnta and openings In tht building that are abMl"W.t>lt 1ource1 of air lukaQII shall bll caulked, gaakatad, weathe ... trlppa,d or QthtlWIM Mtltd, D f 118(b) Sita Constructed Doora, Window• and Skyllghtt •11 ba ~IJI~ a.~ tt,-unit and the building, and shall be WNtheratrlppad (eicc:ept for unframed glH• doors and n ... door,). D f 118(•)1 Manufaeturlld Doora and Window• lnatallad shall have air Infiltration ratn not eicCNdlng thoa9 shown In Table Number 1-E. of the Standard&. Manufac:turad fanestratlon ~ m!J$t bll tati.ltd ror U-v~lut .c.cordlng to Nfl\C prOC*lurH. D I 11B(•> D.mltlflOW•ll• fn NonrMllMntl•I luUdlnQt: The op41que port1oM of fl'..-ned demising wan• In nonrH~tlal bulldlngt •tiall hav• Insulation with an Install~ fl-valu. of no leu thin FM1 bttwffn framing mtmbtra. 2.0 D'I El'ltl'QV8dt Job Numbor. PAGE 12 ENV-MMI IDAb1/10/2000 I Designer Enforcement PIQe:12 of 11S 0t/10/2000 12:31 1 r"'7358578 STUEVEN ENP.,.'IEERING PAGE 13 < I ILIGHTING MANDATORY MEASURES LTG-MMI !PROJECT NAMI!! ~eliotte & Touche DESCRIPTION Designer Enforcement D f 1S1{d)1 BuJlding LI9h0ng Shut-off: The buUdlnSJ llghtlpg shut-off aystarn COM!st. of an Mrtamattc time nwttch. With• ZOfHt for NCh noor; or the building ill separately mat•tld 'Ind Jtn thin t,000 squar. Jett; txlf1'1)C ft'Om the Jhut-off requtnmtnt. D· t n1(d)2 OVarrlde far 8uildJng Ugt,Ung $hut-off; The MtDmllHc bulking shut-off system t. provided WiUI • manual. IICCHllible ovarride switch In sight af the lights. 1'btl aru of ovtrrlH II not to uCMd 1,000 squar. fMt. D f 1111(h) AlltornaUe eonwot O.vkM C~: All •utCfNffc control CMVI!',: .. ..,.c:lfled art cerUlled, al demata aqulpmmt shalt be certffled and Installed u directed by the lillinufaetuntr. D F&uorucent Bdut and t.umanaltwt C..utltld: All fll.K>rtlCent ftxturu apecHltd for the project .,. Ctitifled and Ntt.d In the Directory, All Installed fixtures shall be Cffllfled. D 1132 Tll!ldtm Wiring far One and ThrM Lamp Fl\lortlQl'lt FlxturN: All ON and Uirii. lamp ftoorucant ftltturM 11ra tandem wit.ct with two lamp balllau WMf* niqulrtd by lt.ndatdl ~ 1U; or Ill Chl'ff IM11p ~ ftxturM.,.. ~n.d with llledronlc h~-fnlquency 1,,iuast• and..-. u.mpt from tal'ldtm wiring rt,q~ D 1131(1) Individual Room/ArM Controla: Each room and a,.. In thla bulldlng la 41qulpped with a ~-· swHeh 01' occupancy sensor device for uch UH with floor-to- ce1nngw.1.._ D I 131(b) Unlfann Rllductlon far 1ndlvldual R001TU1: Al rCJOmS and areas grutw than 100 squara fNt 1111d mot11 than 1.D watta I* square foot of ll$Jhtln9 load sh.111 be cordlolled with bUevtl IWllchlng for unlfonn reduction of llghtlng within the room. D f 131(c) Daylight ArN Control: All rooms with windows and lkyllghtl that are grtattr than 210 aquar• fMt and that allow tor the •l'fectfv•"" of ct.tylloht 1n the,,.. wn have 50% of the lamp• In NCh dayllt .,.. controUtd by • MJ)ll'11t• swttc:h; Of the effective UH or dayllght caMOt be ICCOl'llPl!Mtd ~"" tht windows .,. ~nuoc,,Jy ~ by a ~lldlng 011 the lldJlcttnt lot. Diagram of shading during dlffmtnt ttmu of the yur Is lncludad on plans. D I 131(1) Control of Exterior Lights: Exttfior mount.<t ftxturM MfVtd from tbt ~I panel II\IIM tht bulldfng are controlled wfth • ~ photo ~I control on tM roof and 111 con-aspondlng ntly; In the ~ panel. D t 1i1(•) Display Lighting. Display llghtlng shalt~ Mparattly IWltchtd on circuits that .... 20 amps ot -.U. . Ellll'G'l'Pro 2.0 9Y En«11¥Soft U....~3429 JobNumbat: Ptot:'13 cl 1G t I 0~/10/2000 12:31 17'"~7358578 STUEVEN ENC::T' 11::ERING PAGE 14 ~AECHANICAL MANDATORY MEASURES Part 1 of 2 !PROJECT NAM& Deliotte & Touehe DESCRIPTION Equipment and Systems Efflclencle• D 1111 Any app1i.nc. for Whlctt 1hert1 I• • California atandard utabll•hlid In tha Appll~ Efflclancy ""'3ulatl0M will comply with tfM applicable atandard. D I 115(1) · F111 type cantral furr111cH shall not have • pilot light. D f 123 Piping, "'c:.pt that conveying flulda at ttmperaturea betwNn IO and 10lS dttgrHs Fahrenheit, Of within HVAC aqulpment, "hall be lnaulattd In t1CX:Or~ with $t.andil'd* S.C.tlon 12,. D f 124 Air handling duct •Y•~ thalll be lnst.llld and ln,ulatld In c:ompllanc• with Sectlona 401, f03 .rid to4 Qf ~ Uniform M.ehanlc.l Code. Controls I 122(t) Each~ conditioning •Y•tefn thllll be ln,tallld with one of the following: D I 122(e)1A Each apace conditioning ayatem "rvlno building typu •I.ICh aa omcu mxt manu1Ktur1ng facllltlu {and all otti.ra not expllcltly u11mpt from tti. raqulremttnta of Section 112 (d)} ahall be lnstallad with an automatic tlrna swlt.<:h with an accaulb .. manual overrldt that 1llow1 operation oftM ayattm dUrlng Off-hc>Ora ror 'IP to .C houtti. Tht tlm.t •witch 1hall be c:apllble or programming different acti.dulM for WMkdaya Md WMkitnda: lncorporata 11n automatic holiday "llhut• off" fNture that turns off all loada for at lent 24 houra, then rNIJl'IMIS .the nQrmally . achadulad operatlQll; anct hu progr1m backup capabllltl .. that pr•vtmt the 108• of thll devlc.'1 program and tJme aattlng for at IMSt 10 hour. If PoWtr 111ni.rrupt1Jd; Dr D 1122(•)11 An ~ at,NQf to control tht optr•tlno i*lod of tht aysttM; or D I 122(e)1C A '4-hour tlm.r that can be milnually operat.d to ctltlttol tti. op9r1tlng P41rlod of the system. D I 122(t)2 Each apace conditioning 1y1tam shall be lnatallad with control• that tamporarlly restart and t.mpc,rarlly oi,trat. the ayatem •• ,-quired to malntlln • setback heating and/or a utup cooling thermostat Htpolnt. D I 122(g) ~ ·~ conditioning ay,tem Mrvlng rnultlpl• zOMs with a combln.d condlUonad floor arN mor• than 25,000 11ciu-r• fHt shall blJ provided with 1101.atlon .zanu.' Each .zone: shall not IIXCHd 25,000 aquare fHt; shall be provldad with laolatlon dllvlcn, such u valvu or dampara, that allow thll supply of heating or coollr,g to ti. Htbaek Qr ~ut otf l~tly of othar Isolation areas; and shall be controli.ct by a tlmt contro.1 <MV~ 11 ~,crlbtd al>ovt. D I 122(a&b) Each 1pac:4t conditioning 1y.tlffll •hall be controli.d by an lndlvldUlll tti.Jm01Jtat that raaponda to temperature within thtt ZOl'III. Where used to control heating, the control ,hall be lldJu•table down to Gil dttgt ... 'fl or ICJ't\ler. l'ot cooling, the ~trol 1hall be adjustable up to 85 dttgrN1 For higher. ~111 UHd for both helltlng 1111d cooling, the control shall be capable of providing a~ of at 1 .. ,t G &lgrM• F within which the 1upply of heating and cooling 11 fflUt off or r~lk*I to • minimum_. D I 122(c) Thermostats ahall hall* ttUl'Mrlc ••tpolnta tn dtgrM1 ftlhrtnhtlt (P) and adjuatablt ntpolnt •t091' -.,Ible onl:,, to 1111thorlnd ~,._,_I. D t 112(b) Hut pumps shall be Installed with control• to preV11nt electric re1latanca aupplenwHitary heat-er operation when the htMltlng load can be met by the heat pumpalona. Entr!l'ff>ro 2.0 · 9.' E~ Uw N\!ml;)(lf: 3-421J Job Numbllr. IDATE 91/10/2000 Oeslaner Enforcement Page:14d1!i ,-, . " '' B~/10/2000 12:31 1r· :358578 STUEVEN ENI?-· ~-~ERING PAGE 15 IMECHANICAL MANDATORY MEASURES Part 2 of 2 MECH-MMI IPROJICT NAMe . . Dellotte & Touche Description Ventllatlon 0 I 121(•) Control• lhall bii provld41d ta allow outaldA air dampa,.. or dolvl~• to be operatwd at the v.ntllatlcn ratu N •~lfi.d on IMH pltn*. D l 122(1) Gravity or automatic d&mpert lntarlocktd and ctOMd on fan shutdown 1111111 be provldad on the outslda air lntakH and dlacharc,ta of •II •~ conditioning and exhlutt ay.t.ma. D I 122(1) All gr•vlty VW1tllatlng •)'liema 1hllll be provided with automatic or rudlly .ccH1lbl• manually OPtrlttd dampera In all optnlnga to tM outalde, •xcept for combustion air openings. D I 12'1(01 Air Balancing: The 1yatam ahllll be balanced In accordance with tha Nat~I lnvlronm.tnttll ._lancing BurNu (NEBB) Procedural Standards (1993), or AHoclllttd Air Dalanc. Councll (AABC) National Standards (1989); or D f 121(f)2 outside Air C.rtlflcatlon: The sy1tam lhall provide the minimum out11• air 11 ahown on the ~lcal drawing•, and ilhall be l'nHlluntd and certified by thll lnatalllng llcenHd C-20 mechanical contractor and certln.d b)' (1) the a.lgn meohanlcal angln11er, (2) the lnstalllng II~ C-20 ~•~• conttRtot, or CJ) the ".-.on WJth 0'-11111111 l'MJ)Onlllblllty for Che dealgn of the ventilation a)'ltam; or D I 121(f}S OUtsldA Air Mauurament: Toa syatam thall b4I ~lpp-4 with a c.llbrat.cr local or remote device capable of measuring the quantity of out.Ide air on a conUnuous bNI• and dlaptaylno thtlt ~uantlty on a rNdll)' acctulbl• dlaplay dlvlc:e: ot D l121(f)4 Another method approvtd by tht Corninlaalon. Service Water Heating Systems D I 113(b)2 If a alrculatlng )tot water system 11 Installed, It ahall have a control c:apabl• of automatically turning off the alrculatlng pump(•) when hot water Is not requlrad. D I 11l(b)31 Lavatorlu In r•strOOJM of pyblk: fai;llltl .. 1h-JII b4I aqulpped with controls to llmlt the outl•t ttmt,erat\l,. to 110 ~'"' F, D I 11'(b}3C Lavatorlu In restroom& of public facllltlu shall be aqulpped with OM of thll following: Outl•t devk:M that llmlt the now of hot water to.a maximum of 0.11 gallons per minute. Foot actuated control valves, and outfit dolvlcH that limit th4t now or hot water to a maximum or 0.75 oallon• ~r minute. Proximity un10r actuatad control valves, and 0utl1t devices that llmlt the flow of hot wat.wr to a maximum of 0.15 gallom• per mlnut.. S.lf-cloalng valYjt&, and outlet dolvlca1 that limit the now of hot water to • maximum of 2.5 gallons per minute, and 0.25 gallonalcycl• {Cln;ulatlng system). S.lf-cloflng valvff, and outl•t d,tvlc.t that llmlt the now of hot wat•r to II maximum of 2.11 gallona per mlnut-. and O.ISO gallonalcycl• (non-circulating ayat11m). S.lf-<.to.lng valvtt, and outlet <kvleoea Ulat limit the now of hat wat•r to • rnulmum of 2.S uallona ~r mlnut .. •nd 0.75 uallona/cyclt (fOQt twltct)ff and proximity ,tn,or controls}. E~2.0 ~ EnergySQft Ute<' Numbl,r: :,A2SI Job Number: IDAT& 01/10/2000 Designer Enfotcement PaQe:15 ol 15 ', CB000121 2235 FARADAY AV CBAD St: P DELOITTE & TOUCHE,643 SF Tl WHSE TO OFFICE& NEW 184 SF MEZZANINE \ Tl INDUST. Lot#: C.S. I. GENERAL INC. 1ffi1-. ut}' Z:01, I f 1 ;;:-<-tZ 1( r:i-((i() e,tr"1 e, t1lfl" D0(( \ "'·;/i~ ; t\-i.•{co c,,,,-. ~ 9'/1q/cv-Gt_ W#4: jz:,U'Vc__ _1:JJf;:;:p 1 f~+f'f.=I %--· . .,/ ~ S4-o.-f-Fc_ I cf}?.> 106 r:-sa1U c J_fr..._ •r·,~ .·,···-.,J .,· .... i I { b (ii,{vLr-A;,)'> /f--Vi J :5'w,.,..._. ~1 l,_,r .. h / I ;, .• < f' '-'Vt,(_ I /lll.) VCAJ!..,2,/)/4h IVL~ -- (-t..lJi ~J Bl~ ( &.1 k5 _ ,;V~ p,i,_,_ nUJ S ~t-,u £ v:./~ -6 /44;1 ~ t.1 ut::f /4 I~ TO APPLICANT C ~ I~ ~··:,··~· .. .., l{r1:(~0 M* . . ~~Q~';/ · --,---,--· _T! .. I -> -fy.J4~'):" .t~...... . tfMt; ltTu('f~·' £ '' ,,.;:'!:~:· " -~r. 0 ,._, ~ ( t-!3LDG t-1:.1:..,:; l,,.Jl'vif'd::. . ~ ~· )of 1/DD ~_ Jw ~(UN~~ /4 Ut/L fa ci-Jd-~ i /1JL-Z 2 A1lflt? ~ fcJ-1t~ .. & r~ ~ ~JEt " GJ, ~~ '°' ~{oo (Li} ~ µo\,., ~· QI u-6 (!) \C· l or-i,(ee J--~c:.y t. f.j: -.