HomeMy WebLinkAbout2236 CAMEO RD; ; CB890551; Permit("_.
I
E a W P U 3 0 E
k I
a
a 0
a
U W
A
Z
I
I Y
-
t + 0 = G c\ b
U 3 m E
c 2 a
a
U z m I
a
w
3 1
v)
W U 0 O
r
0 t- u a
5
U
I
a 3 L w v) w 2 0 I
W
L D
3 b
9
W 3 m v,
c - 2 a
a w
_I a 0 a L Y 1 U
- t t c 0 -
Ui 11 1- Y013VYlN03 Y3011fIWY3NMO NOllVSN3dW03 S.Y3WIJOM Y30N31
sNollvuVl33q
1
9320 CHESAPEAKE DR., SUlTE
ESGIL CORPORATIO esC%\ t- 5\4[8?
SAN DlEGO, CA 92123
(619) 560.1468
DATE : 51\21 A9
JURISDICTION:
PLAN CHECK NO: 89-551 SET:
PROJECT ADDRESS: 2 '36 C&WEO (328
PROJECT NAME: N& VK 6.- I
OFILE COPY nups DESIGNER
The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes.
The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficien- cies identified are resolved and checked by building department staff.
The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck.
The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corp. until corrected
plans are submitted for recheck.
The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to return to the applicant contact person.
0 The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to:
Esgil staff did not advise the applicant contact person that @ plan check has been completed.
0 Esgil staff - did advise applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted:
Date contacted: Telephone # 0 REMARKS:
~y:'xW C\LSN\y4d
ESGIL CORPORATION Enc 1 Osures :a?L ANS
OGA OAA Ovw ODM
ESGIL CORPORATION
9320 CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 208 m~, L"sij.lt +\ \7 I09
SAN DIEGO, CA 92 123
(619) 5601468
DATE : 4\24) 09
JURISDICTION: GI1?Yzcsnw
PROJECT ADDRESS: 2 2 36 c&W EO Rm
<
PLAN CHECK NO: €39-5'51 SET:
The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where
building codes.
0 necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's
The plans transmitted herewith will substantial.ly comply
cies identified are resolved and
checked by building department staff.
0 with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficien-
The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies
and resubmitted for a complete recheck. 0 identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected
The check list transmitted herewith is for your information.
plans are submitted for recheck. @ The plans are being held at Esgil Corp. until corrected
The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the
The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to:
0 jurisdiction to return to the applicant contact person.
\LE 6 LEXr=tMDCT;"&L 211 C~W\UVO PGl-Rj c\ 6 I
.. 1 Vt5*! c $I. 3mA3
Esgil staff did not advise the applicant contact person that plan check has been completed, am+- ~~.r~13 mWliryg(,
0 Esgil staff ais advise applicant that the plan check has
been completed. Person contacted:
Date contacted: Telephone #
. 0 REMARKS:
A
BUILDTNG PORTION BUILDING AREA
Prepared by:
Gq
1 'VALUATION VALUE MULTIPLIER
Jurisdiction c-3-
d
A ir Conditioning Commercial .
Residential
Fire Sprinklers
Total Value
Res. or Corn.
I
VALUATTON AND PLAN CHECK FEE
@I
@
@
697%.
i 1
a Bldg. Dept.
a Esgil
PLAN CHECK NO. 63-5!
BUILDING OCCUPANCY DESlGNER PHONE
TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION v-h( CONTRACTOR PHONE
Building Permit fee $- 90*00 s
Plan Check Fee $ 58eSO $
COHHENTSi
OF - SEEBT
12/87
U
0
0
U
0
0
D
0
0
ENGl NEERl NG CHECKLIST
Date : 5-/7-89
Plan Check No. @& /
Project Address: 2236 c- &
Project Name: & Racrfldd
Field Check Date:
By :
LEGAL REQUIREMENTS
Site Plan
7 Item Complete
Item Incomplete - Needs
Your Action
1,2,3 Number in circle
indicates plancheck
number that deficiency
was identified
1. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: North
arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed
structures , streets , ex is ti ng street improvements, right-of-way
width and dimensioned setbacks.
2. Show on Site Plan: Finish floor elevations, elevations of finish
grade adjacent to building, existing topographical lines, existing
and proposed slopes, driveway and percent (%) grade and drainage
patterns.
Provide legal description of property. 3.
4. Provide assessor's parcel number.
PERMITS REQUIRED
Grading
5. Grading permit required. (Separate submittal to Engineering
Department required for Grading Permit).
6.
7. Need the following completed prior to building permit issuance:
Grading plans in plan check PE
A. Grading plans signed.
B. Grading permit issued.
C. Grading completed.
D. Certification letter and compaction reports submitted.
E. Grading inspected and permit signed off by City Inspector.
8. Right-of-way Permit required for work in public right-of-way
(e.g., driveway approach, sidewalk, connection to water main, etcl .
9. Industrial Waste Permit application required. To be filled out
completely and returned to Development Processing.
do
/' dn
10. a Park-in-Lieu fees required.
Quadrant: - , Fee Per Unit: - , Total Fee: -
11. 0. Traffic impact fee required.
Fee Per Unit: - , Total Fee: /3~a
12.
0 13.
0
0 14.
Bridge and Thoroughfare fee required
Fee Per Unit:- , Total Fee:
Public facilities fee required.
Facilities management fee required. Fee: 9W-A .
U
FEES REQUIRED
REMARKS:
15. rV Additional EDU's required: 9& && Sewer connection fee: - Sewerope'rmit no. -
c3 16. Sewer lateral required :
If you have any questions about any of the above items identified on this plan
check, please call the Development Processing Department at 438-1 161.
School District: San Dieguito
0
0
0
0
PLANN I NC CHECK LIST
Plan Check No. m’s-T/ Address cb le3
Type of Project and Use (-E Aapr.rud
Zone Use Allowed? YES b( NO
Setback: Front a Side OK. Rear mx .
Facilities Management Zone 1
Carlsbad &-
E nci n i ta s
San Marcos
Discretionary Action Required YES NO _hc Type
YES No %-- Environmental Required
Landscape Plan Required YES NO d.
Comments
No & Coastal Permit Required YES
Additional Comments