The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2237 FARADAY AVE; B; 86-635; PermitII) z 0 ~ IIC ~ :ii 0 II: I[ 8 IIC Ill 0 ... 3 I Ill z ~ O I hereby affirm that I am licensed under provlalona of Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 7000) of Division 3 of the Business and Proleaalons Code, and my license Is In lull force and effect. I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contrac- tor's License Law for the following reason (Sec 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any city or county whicli re-quires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish, or repair any structure, prior to its iss.uance also requires !heap- plicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor· s license Law {Chapter 9 commencing with Sectmn 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or that is ex- empt therefrom and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031,5 by an applicant tor a permit sub- jects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hun- dred dollars ($500). I I I, as owner of the property, or my employees with wages as tlleir sole compensation, will do the work, and the struc-ture is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intend-ed or offered for sale. lf, however, the building or improve- ment is sold within one year of completion, the owner-buil~er will have the burden of proving that he did not build or im- prove for the purpose of sale). r:J I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or im-proves thereon, and who contracts for each projects with a contractor(s) license pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). D As a homeowner I am improving my home, and the follow-ing conditions exist: 1 . The work is being performed prior to sale. 2. I have lived in my home for twelve months prior to completion of this work. 3. I have not claimed this exemption during the last three years. D I am exempt under Sec. _______ , B& P.C. "II for this reason ____________ _ z 0 .:: ~ z Ill A. 2 0 u II) ii: II.I :.:: CIC 0 :J tl 0 I hereby affirm that I have a certificate o onse to t self-insure. or a certificate of Workers· Com~e sa In-I surance. or a certified copy thereof (Sec. 3800. r Code) I POLICY NO. I ) COMPANY ,~ I D Copy is filed with the city D Certified copy is hereby furnishe I I I I CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION FROM I WORKERS· COMPENSATION INSURANCE I (This section need not be completed if the permit f is for one hundred dollars ($100) or less) I D t certify, that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any I manner so as to become subject to the Workers· Com pen-I sation Laws of California. f NOTICE TO APPLICANT: If, after making this Certificate I ~~~:~~~~~Y~~o:~~~~sb~f~: ~~~~~c~~d~~ey:ir~:=~ i forthwith comply with such provisions or this permit shall I be deemed revoked. 0 I hereby affirm that there i~ a construction !ending J agency for the performance of the work for which this per-i mit is issued (Sec. 3097, Civil Code) i Lender's Name ____________ ~ I Lender's Address ____________ _ USE BALL POINT PEN ONLY & PJESS HARD QTY. QTY. CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 2075 Las Palma& Dr., Carlsbad, C~ 92009-4859 (619) 438-1161 PLUMBING PERMIT· ISSUE EACH FIXTURE TRAP EACH BUILDING SEWER TOTAL PLUMBING NEW CONST EA AMP.'SWT 1BK R 1 PH 3 PH EXl~T BLDG EA AMP/SWT/BKR QTY.I YO N 0 vO NO REOEVELOPMENT AREA vO NO MECHANICAL PERMIT -ISSUE INSTALL FURN. DUCTS UP TO 100,000 BTU OVER 100,000 BTU BOILER/COMPRESSOR UP TO 3 HP BOILER/COMPRESSOR 3 15 HP METAL FIREPLACE VENT FAN SINGLE DUCT MECH EXHAUST -HOOOIDUCTS RELOCATION OF EA FURNACE/HEATER DAYER VENT TOT 1iL MECHANICAL II QTY., MOBILE HOME SETUP -CAR PORT --AWNING -- GARAGE APPLICANT TO FILL IN INFORMATION WITHIN SHADED AREA AND DECLARATIONS. \r~ __;.oo .,,... - vO ~ PERMIT NUMBER ~ _,.-(p?;) ~ ~ ~" / ~ ~· ,('.o" 0 ' t4~ l ' ;,"¾~ t\ .., 0 v ,-,. ,·, -_ .. \.,. .. _ ·f .... \ ,, ,, (,:·,:;>_.;)t-~ Not Valid Unlt!Sdhchine Certified SUMMARY/ACCOUNT !<{UMBER ·"'""'~ ·~· BUILDING PERMIT 001·810°SQl:Fdb--8220 SIGN PERMIT 001·810-00-00-8221 PLAN CHECK 001-810·00·00·8821 TOTAL PLUMBING 001·810-00-00-8222 ELECTRICAL 001·810-00·00·8223 MECHANICAL 001-810-00-00·8224 MOBILEHOME 001-810·00-00·8225 SOLAR 001·810·00-00-8226 STRONG MOTION 880-519-92-33 FIRE SPRINKLERS 001·810·00·00·8227 PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE 320-810-00·00-8740 BRIDGE FEE ~,07-,.._ /f,l-')11'~0-00-8740 TIP'J-1. [ 0 134·810-00-00-8835 o- LA COSTA TIF 133·810·00-00-8835 FMF I 11 PH 3 PH I II I I I LICENSE TAX1,, ~ 001-810-00·00·8162 - REMODEL.'ALTER PER CIRCUIT, MFF I Y., }._\(j/') 880·519-92-57 TEMPPOLE 20011.MPS OVER 200 AMPS TEMP OCCUPANCY 130 DAYSI CREDIT DEPOSIT TOTAL ELECTRICAL 8 Cl) u::: >-~ 0 a. E Cl) I- 'O 0 (!} C o:I -~ a. a. <( I .:s:. C a: 0 Cf) Cf) Cl) Cf) Cf) <( I ~ .2 ai >- Cl) u C o:I C u::: :::. C Cl) ~ C!} 0 ti Cl) a. Cf) C ~ .c ~ TYPE J DATE INSPECTOR .l 'B~--~&; .. ~ . ' . BUILDING I . FOUNDATION J FIELD INSPECTION RECORD REINFORCED STEEL 1. REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS INSPECTOR'S NOTES .. MASONRY l -,": . . . . ~ I REQ. IF INSPECTOR'S . INSPECTION DATE GUNITE OR GROUT l CHECKED APPROVAL . . SUB FRAME D FLOOR D CE LING SOILS COMPUANCE SHEATHING D ROOF D St,iEAR I/ PRIOR TO . 1//'K'f-!,A)>/_.,,,, -' ft-~.JN~~P .1 ~ FRAME ) or-7 . • ~' ., • ,F. ' .. .. l I I I . STRUCTURAL CONCRETE ·' --.. .• '; EXTERIOR LATH OVER 2000 PSI , .... .,. INSULATION I . I PRESTRESJ¥: .: .. :, .. t .,f rjm;, ~ -:,-~.., INTERIOR LATH & DRYWALL IY+ J nv1~..,,:~ i~ I POST TENSIONED '. i { / I ,; CONCRETE ,. ,• .... t· ~ :,,. • !., ·""' ~ • . \ ~ . . "·' PLUMBING J FIELD W(LDIKIG D SEWER AND BL/co·. DI ~UCO : ......... ~· ~ · .. -·"" .. .,. ~ .. / 'h HIGH_ STR_ENGJH'.-i ·-. BOLTS UNDERGROUND D WASTE [ WATER SPECIAL MASONRY ~" T.OP OUT D WASTE D WATER -·- TUB AND SHOWER PAN I -"· GAS TEST I PILES CAISSONS J o·wATER HEATER D SOLAR WATER . ' . ·• ' ..• . .__,, I ELECTRICAL I I D ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND DJ UFFER I ' ROUGH ELECTRIC ' J /~ "J-. I D TEM~RARY I . D ELECTRIC SERVICE \ --.. D BONDING D POOL I ' ·. •A,.;; .. \: •. ; . .· ,.· .·. MECHANICAL I ' D DUCT & PLEM., D REF. PIRING 1 ~ [( IJ "' ,. -.--~ -. ..,_ - ~ HEAT -AIR COND. SYSTEMS j l ev'J/'6t rr ' -~-,. ·-' --.. . IJ-,' . . 1· ,, VENTILATING SYSTEMS ! ---..} ~ . -,J I V . ~ .. CALL FOR FINAL INSPECJION WHEN ALL APPROPRIATE .... ITEMS ABOVE HAVE BEEN APPROVED. .. ,,· .J FINAL I • PLUMBING ' L,. v1 l ~J~ ~:y ~-ELECTRICAL l I .. • .J . . , MECHANICAL l of .~~ ' . -~~~..d ~ 1 • • I -. . --' . ' . .· .. \ -.. .. GAS /) . ~ .A C> .... . ..... I I I u'/Y"'1 1 ,rff ~-·'. BUILDING rivf~-J ,,vit}J_;B1, ~ 1 .il '--J• SPECIAL CONDITIONS ii I V I ,. l~ .L pv -11> ..... , I .uJiA ..... I ':f"J/ /JL>---- ' ...... ,. ,, ... ,.,. .? .... --~j City of Carlsba-d MISCELLANEOUS 1200 ELM, CARLSBAO, CA 92008 • TEL. (619) 438-5525 REGEIPT rJob '2:Z.37 •• I -, '-·I',--.( . /:-.:-../~ . MISCELLANEOUS FEE RECEIPT " Address : I -....f --;"~ .. '.!'--;-,-~ Owner t:'.01,..,--l--{~1.:). • PLAN CH7.CK FEE 01-00-00-8806 •-\ I D i Malling ·-1 ,· •. ::~-7 f 1 -k-1·Jf·1-:--i:: ... J-D· D / :) 7 '"19'<'-~ Address VALUATION ..__;; • , -) \.. .. ) ...... t,:. I ---1 ,, City '.\ i I ·1 , . .::../,--,< -, I ZIP, f t I// Te[.1 ,.1 7_ __ ,-C ,. D DEMOLITION j '' ,_ ,._._,.,' ·---\ .' L,,' I ~I :,-'-,-,,. -'--:;, J...) (_. Contractor I • . 1 l (.c) D HOUSE MOVING 1 ..... 1,.,..,·\ ... / • Address (~ ... ,I• \·'1/::. D PARKS AND RECREATION FEE ·'.. ,. -I · ·-... VE ,, l -\ I~ ..-I-;:._• -\t_...(._ __. D City I Zip Tel. PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE D SCHOOL FEE · DISTRICT State Lie. , City -2 6 S. Classif. j!,, -f :2 2 I -U.t14-Lie. No. ((1 ,..(I ·_ ,0 Carlsbad COMPLETE FOR PLAN CHECK ONLY D Encinitas l i''T C.1 --! .:------pt '.-t__,' --1,,·~t...:J D San Diego LEGAL DESCRIPTION l.--/_. t_,·,, _ . .,..,,.., _., D San Marcos i_.,,,l>,'f I:,·,,__.,.,. I ) • I' l ) • '-.. :;'-,J- '•. l ,.~ (._,.J D CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. n n DESCRIPTION OF WORK -·r-l ·;1-. , \1 ! _:;;_ I'-·1-'/'..,__ l 1--· fH::)UF-tll:1 r~ . -· :••.1_1..-1 \1 i] .t _!..1. ,-, i , .: ! l -fl i/,J -=---r 1/. Y'li I --t .I ~ --~~11-=u_...,,. D 1l -,77 C , D r::.. ''x FT .. tn F'"F I er_-.. v-l-I .J -l • 'n D Cl,, I ..-,,,...,..--D PLAN ID NO. 6/~ ,.,. (,y.,::~, __ , \ \ !.1-/0,i-::...t:.,> G· A ~i _-cc·, , D DESIGNER ADDRESS ' f ·, , ') I·--. ·,, _ _,_ I 1 (\) /()f,J ~r. D -t-.f ,_ 1 C'H:::{,-::C\ C:/~ ,·r:z.tct D ,' ,'-)' I ) :~ 3 C.::i -t, ·· Ur t,,.-I PHON~ ----TOTAL FEE $ I-/ I CONTACT PERSON : .. \ } l ' l .. J J\. J\ I • 1 ,-1 I L l , 1-/---1 j'.J t,..:: --r1C.:,--*WARNING: PLAN CHECK FEES, WHERE NO ACTION IS TAKEN BY THE APPLICANT IN 180 DAYS AND NO BUILDING PERMIT IS ISSUED. ARE FORFEITED TO THE CITY. COMMENTS: Signature of Applicant Date \. ~ White -Applicant Yellow -File Pink -(i) Finance (2) Data Process Gold -Assessor CASHIER'S VALIDATION (!!tty nf <tturlshnh ,; 1t {_, • 1 11 f > _1 SEWER PERMIT APPLICATION APPLICANT TO FILL IN SHADED AREA SEWER PERMIT NUMBER: _S...c...=E;c__~----"'-:-~-,_l ------ BUILDING PLAN CHECK NUMBER:_P_C __ ~_0_-~~~.3~:;-~-- BUILDING ADDRESS: )..d--3 7 fp,t:A-'1~;5 ~ .5, BUILDING TYPE: _____________ _ I NUMBER OF EDU'S: ---'-' -''\;------------ OWNER:_l_,_c_/ _f __ ,-,_, _ __, _________ ---t CALCULATIONS: ___ ~----~---'-'~· ,~' __ MAILING ADDRESS: _-_7_· ·/ __ ~:_r __ ---'-+-·!~-.,__, '~-,_r_. ,_ .. _:_: --+----'-\ -'''---~-------------- I / / ' ,. I t· -, p ' -~; . -1 I , ,' ··-,' i j I ( ' _,I "· ~ ~· _ .. ,...,,.. ... ._......,--t ..... CONTRACTOR:__./_-,--'--~_.,_/--'-, ___________ r tf_,__-,c\_,__E:-"':;:-'--0_J~_-__________ _ MAILING ADDRESS: ____..._._, _i _,_, _.,:'--· ----------+--------------------- / '--r ,..., I !' LEGAL DESCRIPTION: _-_ .• _', _,_~ --~-·--· _l -·-'--f-_.•_r_, ~ f I -, (1 ( ) () COST PER UNIT CONNECTION FEE ' I , r -_____ x NO. UNITS __,_; ___ _ , LATERAL CHARGE: __ · _, ~--_-_________ _ TOTAL CHARGES: __ \_1 __ ._-·_-________ _ A$SESSORS PARCEL NUMBER: __ ·_/-='.":;;.'-' _· _,·_/_,_/_-__ :_' _f_-PREPARED BY: (PRINTED NAME) COMMENTS:---------------------------------- WHITE: DPS GREEN: Finance CANARY: Water PINK: Building GOLD: Applicant JANUARY 20, 1987 TO: CARTER DARNELL, BUILDING DEPARTMENT FROM: Mike Smith, Fire Department 86-635 SEMCO If the corridor is nonconforming, and you wish to rely on the occupant to limit the occupant load, I recommend you require the following: 1. A letter from the owner which states that he understands occupancy limitations and why they must be imposed. The letter should also indicate owner's intent to maintain occupant load. 2. Post the suites affected with a permanent occupant load sign. I would prefer that we not rely solely on fire department inspectors to police this matter. MIKE SMITH MS:slh SPACE PLANNING December 24, 1986 Mr. Tony Mata City of Carlsbad / ] . HOWARD AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Building Inspection Department 2075 Las ;!.al a,s A. ~}~008 Re: No. Pl Dear Mr. Mata: This letter will serve to clarify the use of the above referenced office space. INTERIOR DESIGN The tenant is expanding into existing adjacent office space. The occupant load for the total space will not exceed 30 - occupants. Sincerely, .......... / ~rt,>-~-c.--r,, Project Manager J. HOWARD & ASSOCIATES, LR:rlc cc: Esgil Corporation Koll Company INC. 1432 UNION STREET SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92101 (619) 235-6166 Tiiis is to certify that insulation has been installed in confonnance with the current en~rgy regulation, California Administrative Code, Title 25, State of California, in the building located at: SI1E ADDRESS 2237 Faradar, Suite 100 § 101, Carlsbad, CA CEILINGS Owens/Coming 6¼11 Certain Teed 6 II Batts: Type Fiberglass Manufacturer Manville Thickness 6½11 R-Value Blown: Type Manufacturer Thickness R-Value EXTERIOR WALLS Owens/Coming 3½11 Certainteed 3½11 Type Fiberglass Manufacturer Manville Thickness 4 II R-Value FLOORS Type Manufacturer Thickness R-Value General Contractor License# 19 ------------------------ By_-_____________ Title _________ Date ________ _ Schmid Insulation Contractors, Inc. License# 221517 C-2 --------- ,. FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION PLAN CHECK NUMBER: PROJECT NAME: --------------------------------- ADDRESS: PROJECT NO.: ________ UNIT NUMBER: ________ PHASE NO.: _______ _ TYPE OF UNIT: ____ ...:::B2,:="'=:=0__.;.'f_;":._,:,"""";_;_,:,:__;-"-i!·_·:• __ NUMBER OF UNITS: CONTACT PERSON: __ ~----------------------------- CONTACT TELEPHONE:, ______________________________ _ INSPECTED~ BY: --~v-----'-'------'=---- INSPECTED BY: _________ _ INSPECTED BY: _________ _ DATE INSPECTED: DATE INSPECTED: DATE INSPECTED: APPROVED ~ DISAPPROVED __ _ APPROVED DISAPPROVED __ _ APPROVED DISAPPROVED -~~ COMMENTS: ---------------------------------- Rev. 1/86 WHITE: Suspense BLUE: Water District GRE~N: Engineering CANARY: Utilities PINK: Planning GOLD: Fire ESGIL CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 ?e::.'o. (5S:;.,L-/'2-(,t/bb (619) 560· l 468 DATE: l'2..t\z.l6Co QAPPLICANT Q--Jtrl<ISDICTI~ JURISDICTION: C fh'2..l$'BA-0 ~LAN CHECKER D FILE COPY QUPS PLAN CHECK NO: 8Ca -Cr;,3 $' -:IT[ 0 DESIGNER PROJECT ADDREs s : _z_-z._~_'1_.__F_,e ......... ,L_\_·c._A----=-s:>"""'~'""----'4 __ A.J""'. a..;L=;:;:-_. _ \ PROJECT NAME: D D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially ccimp1y with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficien- cies identified ______________ are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on ·the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. ·o The check list t~ansmitted herewith is"fo~ your info~fuation. .The p~ans are being held at ESgil Corp. until corrected·_. piaris are submitted for recheck. -· . ·. ":·_ ·_ ... D D • ~l D D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to return to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil staff did not advise the applicant contact person that plan check has been completed. Esgil staff did advise applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted: _______ Telephone# ________ _ REMARKS: -------------------------- Enclosures: ct) \l-A-\~.S ESGIL CORPORATION . ' ' :-. ~·~ j. I· !, : ·. . . I ESGIL CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 rr7t-;:;?-___ ',.,1 . 10( s I 8 0 (619) 560· I 468 ~~'-..v I '--' DATE: OAPPLICANT j I JURISDICTION: (A-QLS~AD ~~~~~~ PLAN CHECK NO: D FILE COPY OUPS PROJECT ADDRESS: 2 ,,z 3 I i::=;-A--t2 .. :yQ__ ADA L{ D DESIGNER PROJECT NAME: D D D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's buildi~g codes when minor deficien- cies identifie·d ______________ are resolved and checked by building depa~trnent staff. _The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your.information . . The p~ans are being held at ESgil Corp. u~til corrected· plans are submitted for recheck. '· D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to return to the applicant contact person. .· .... D D The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: LL( r-.1 N k?. \ N.E H-~Y2..1 I d..-3Z. !..\l \6 Y s--r. Esgil staff did not advise the applicant contact person that plan check has been completed.) OT~a-11-h:::; .. i-; '(<l'A-\l-111)~ · Esgil staff did advise applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted: _______ Telephone# ________ _ REMARKS: __________________________ _ By=~/\ c"-5" ,_ L::; ·..:...., ·r--N ESGIL CORPORATION -·r9-t. l-~\ (2..,(::::::-J jf--1 I ,-) Ol=Q-s::. • lSY\J.f) ,a. ·-.. ESGIL CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) 560· I 468 DATE: l \\ 'Z. ti B 6, \ JURISDICTION= c~ L'5BAo AN CHECKER 0 FILE COPY OUPS PLAN CHECK NO: Seo -Co 7--i %' -r 0 DESIGNER PROJECT ADDRESS: 2 2-31 ~'AJ?..,i'2..-fu20v( BJ~ PROJECT NAME= Se W\ l.D -Prh4~ e JI:. .o D D D II . ~,· ,. ·,;t II D D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficien-cies identified ______________ are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans tra~smitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. ·The check list t~ansmitted herewith is.for yb~r:inforfuation. . The p:lans ?J.re being held at Esg'il Co~p. unt.il corr~cted ·_. ~ians are submitted for recheck. · ., · The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to return to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: . LlfN~ R.tNE H1412.J 143-Z l)N}O bl '5.,, . Esgil staff did not advise -the applicant contact person that plan check has been completed) O-n\-b,-e. TAAN m'A-IL..\c.-lq-· Esgil staff did advise applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted: Telephone# ________ _ REMARKS: _________________________ _ En_closures: Q)C,,z,e, L,:,..,... (, t'"t""E"'L) .. •' ® 2 \C.. l?;Q I TV-rE1?,?J3.s;;n,.--n o M S. I !..: ., j I I. j" ! . i . ! ·'· ,. i I •. i ~~; -r \\ '2. 8l:, C c:>-<Z.. (2.... I O ~ 1'9--,,uO . ' . ·; :\ . ·:) ' . -.-.. ·:\ I . (l!J) O Yt 'f¥/ .\ · . ,/ .· · ,,i, tY \J ,f\ • ·_;, J.' > , A , I :1 . • 0, .. /. /•11 •. ,. /' · • ,. I·,. Y-9" t,",, , ,), c' · . ,: ·, · • ;·· . l .J' ·• \' "' . 'i; ' . ; -/. International vv •jl·:,:·,; :,-'";-,\~1 ._-.-,;_.:·~) . r' ' i, I ~1) Conference of Building Officials·.~/ 5360 SOUTH WORKMAN MILL ROAD • WHITTIER, CALIFORNIA 90601 • (213) 699-0541 BOARD OF DIR.ECTOR$ CHAIRMAN DAVID A. BASSETT, P.E. BUILDING SAFETY DIRECTOR MEDFORD, OREGON February 19, 1986 MAR 1 O 198G OFFICES OF ESGil CORPO,,A TIC. I PRESIDENT 9320 r-H:=~AP"AK-' " • -~ ~ D: ! JAMES E. BIHR, P.E. EXECUTIVE VICE-PRESIDENT DONALD R. WATSON, P.E. F1RsTv1cE-cHAIRMAN Michael Bouse MARKR.RODMAN B ·id· off" · 1 DIRECTOR. BUILDING SERVICES Ul mg IC 1a sPR1NGF1ELD, 1LuN01s -City Hall SECONDVICE-CHAIRMAN 1400 Highland Avenue . RECEiVf:O · •·• cHARLEscLAwsoN ·······-····Manhattan Beach California DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY • J 90266 .: .. DEVELOPMENT . F•i.} 2· i -~'-·, ·• !.:u 1~;;:;J ARLINGTON, TEXAS IMMEDIATE PAST CHAIRMAN JOHN E. MAULDING, P.E. BUILDING OFFICIAL LANCASTER, CALIFORNIA BOB FOWLER, A.I.A., P.E. DIRECTOR OF BUILDING INSPECTION ALBILENE, TEXAS PHILLIP M. HERRINGTON DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY RENO, NEVADA DOUGLAS E. HOOD BUILDING OFFICIAL COLORADO RIVER INDIAN TRIBES PARKER, ARIZONA SOL J. JACOBS, P.E, DIRECTOR OF INSPECTIONS MINNEAPOLIS/ MINNESOTA JAMES L. MANSON DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING ANO SAFETY COUNTY OF SPOKANE SPOKANE, WASHINGTON MICHAEL J, NOLTE BUILDING OFFICIAL CRESWELL, OREGON WILLIAM E. SCHLECHT BUILDING OFFICIAL COUNTY OF WASHINGTON H_ILLSBORO, OREGON JAMES R. SINGLETON BUILDING SAFETY ADMINISTRATOR TUCSON, ARIZONA BRENT SNYDER BUILDING OFFICIAL PACIFICA, CALIFORNIA RONALD R. TREMBLAY BUILDING OFFICIAL ASSARIA, KANSAS STANLEY WHEELER BUILDING OFFICIAU FIRE MARSHAL LIVERMORE. CALIFORNIA EUGENE J. ZELLER, P.E. SUPERINTENDENT OF BUILDING ANO SAFETY LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA SUBJECT: Dear Mike: Corridor Construction Requirements Sections 3305 (g) and (h) 1982 Uniform Building Code 'r."''d H.t~ ••••••••••• , We have reviewed the plans enclosed with your letter of January 16, 1986, and it is our opinion that the corridor system interconnecting areas 1, 2 and 3 designated on the plans must comply with the require- ments of Sections 3305 (g) and (h). You stated in your letter that ea·ch of areas 1, 2 and 3 depicted on the office plan enclosed has ari"-occupant load of less than 30. Further- more, each of the three portions is provided with an exit. You ques- . tioned whether a nonprotected corridor for each of the three sections would be ·considered acceptable. Our answer is no. The corridor system is serving the total of.areas 1, 2 and 3. Accordingly, the total occupant load of areas 1, 2 and 3 should be considered in deter- mining whether or not the corridor system by which they are served must be of fire-resistive construction or not. The aggregate area representing a total occupant load of 85 as you stated in your letter would require the corridor system to be of one-hour construction with openings protected as required·by Section 3305 (h). Please note that in the 1985 code an exception was added to Section 3305 (g)· to allow up to 100 occupants within an office space before corridor protection is required. This exception applies when the entire story in which the space is locatep is equipped with an automatic sprinkler system throughout and smoke detectors are installed within the corridor in accordance with their listing. You also asked whether a 20-minute assembly across the corridor where it crosses from Section I to Section 2 anc again where it crosses from Section 2 to Section 3 would satisfactorily divide the portions being served so that each section could-be considered separately · and thereby_permitting the corridors to be nonrated. We feel that this would not m.eet .the intent of the code. If, however, horizontal exits complying with Section 3308 are provided at the locations where Regional Offices: 6738 N. W. Tower Drive • Kansas City, Missouri 64151 • (816) 7 41-2241 12505 Bellevue-Redmond Road, Suite 208 • Bellevue, Washington 98005 • (206) 451-9541 603 \Vest 13th Street, Suite 2-F • Austin, Texas 78701 • {512) 479-8278 :- == p • ) -2- the 20-minute assemblies are proposed across the corridor, the corridors in each of the three sections may be nonrated. We are returning your plans enclosed herewith. If additional questions should arise regarding this plan, please do not hesitate to contact us. TJK:amg:em Enclosure Sincerely, ~(__ T. J. Koyamatsu, P.E. Chief Plan Ch_eck Engineer ... ---·-· -· --·-· ·-· ·-.-··----· --·······---.. ·--··-·--··-·. -·---··---·-··- -l .-.. :. ~ -,. J il • I , , "'l . ,-1 f -_, ,~ I . ~ -, ~ -1' \~ n· ... -· ti i ~= --· ~'.! i --· --~-J ...... . , ··--! .•.• ., II"' . t'~ ... : ~t I .. ,,!\ • • .• L: I t., . -t,;!f ... . ~; . ' -) :; .::=.·.:,. ·_:y _. • . . ··;, •,·• ' . . ., ;. ;, . t:I n \--z Cl-< -0 z .W L l n r 1'J r. nn __ ,_ -. -· ,...M _______ ,.. ___________ ., _______ ~_....,....:.;. >··=, . , ,_. i ••. c· ,_ ... . ······------------ --- . --· __ -···) :· .. · . ·-. . : ..... . ~:--)' . --:_/ the ceilings shall be not less than that required for a one-hour fire- resistive floor or roof system. EXCEPTIONS: I. One-story buildings housing Group B, Division 4 Occupancies. 2. Corridors more than 30 feet in width where occupancies served by such corridors have at least one exit independent from the corridor. (See Appendix Chapter 7. P-drt I, for covered malls.) 3. Exterior sides of exterior exit balconies. 4. In Group I, Division 3 Occupancies such as jails, prisons, refor- matories and similar buildings with open-barred cells forming corridor walls, the corridors and cell doors need not be fire resistive. When the ceiling of the entire story is an element of a one-hour fire- resistive floor or roof system, the corridor walls may terminate at the ceiling. When the room-side fire-resistive membrane of the corridor wall is carried through to the underside of a fire-resistive floor or roof above, the corridor side of the ceiling may be protected by the use of ceiling materials as required for one-hour floor or roof system con- struction or the corridor ceiling may be of the same construction as the corridor walls. Ceilings of noncombustible construction may be suspended below the fire-resistive ceiling. For wall and ceiling finish requirements, see Table No. 42-B. (h) Openings. I. Doors. When corridor walls ae required to be of one-hour fire-resistive construction by Subsection (g) above, every door opening shall be protected by a tight-fitting smoke-and draft- control assembly having a fire-protection rating of not less than 20 minutes when tested in accordance with U.B.C. Standard No. 43-2 without the hose stream test. The door and frame shall bear an approved label or other identificaton showing the rating thereof, the name of the manufacturer and the identification of the service conducting the inspection of materials and workmanship at the factory during fabrica- tion and assembly. Doors shall be maintained self-closing or shall be automatic closing by actuation of a smoke detector in accordance with Section 4306 (b). Smoke-and draft-control door assemblies shall be provided with a gasket so installed as to provide a seal where the door meets the stop on both sides and cross the top. EXCEPTIONS: 1. Viewports may be installed if they require a hole not larger than 1 inch in diameter through the door, have at least a ¼- inch-thick glass disc and the holder is of metal which will not melt out when subject to temperatures of l 700°F. 2. Protection of openings in the interior walls of exterior exit bal- conies is not required. 2. Openings other than doors. Interior openings for other than doors or ducts shall be protected by fixed, approved ¼-inch-thick wired glass installed in steel frames. The total area of all openings, other than doors. in any portion of an interior corridor shall not exceed 25 percent of the area of the corridor wall of the room which it is separating from the corridor. For duct openings, sec Section 4306. EXCEPTION: Protection of openings in the interior walls of exterior / 't.balconics is not requirc~·d. '"-. .. , ,,...---- Q • Theacco'"nipanying plan is of the third floor of a building • that is being entirely remodeled for a suite of law offices. The shaded area (corridor) is the portion of the plan on hich a code interpretation is needed. It is the contention of this department that the corridor (shaded area) must be of one-hour fire-resistive construction. The lawyers are contending that the corridor is not a corridor and does not have to be of one-hour fire-resistive construction. They also feel a sprin- kler system should alleviate any concerns we have for exiting. Furthermore, it is their contention that the code allows exiting at distances up to 200 feet without requiring a fire-resistive corridor. Those reasons, coupled with their interpretation that the shaded area is an adjoining or intervening room, provides their rationale that the corridor does not need to be rated. Would you please sort out the facts and give us your opinion? A • We concur that the shaded area does constitute an exit • corridor as contemplated by the code and as such would be required to conform with the provisions of Subsections 3305 (g) and (h). The installation of the automatic system is certainly desirabl~; however, corridors are intended to serve as egress routes which provide protection not only from fire but also from smoke con- tamination. Although an automatic sprinkler system may provide protection from fire, it provides no protection from smoke and should not be considered as a substitute for the protection required by Sections 3305 (g) and (h~ The provisions of Section 3303 (d) dealing with maximum dis- tance of exit travel establish separate and distinct limitations on the total exit system, regardless of the elements which make up the exit system, and are not germane to corridor protection. Application of the provisions of Section 3303 (e) permitting exiting through an adjoining or intervening room would be appro- priate only when such an area is reasonably judged to be an intervening room. In the case in question, it is our opinion that the classification of the corridor as an adjoining or intervening room is inappropriate . . , ... ,. · .... ·. . Dates~g{_p . Prepared bys -(J1\/y\ Jurisdiction -G"9:i2,,LS'58:Q VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE PLAN CHECK NO. 80 -G::,3 5 -:J._ - CJ Bldg. !?ept • 0 Esgil BUILDING ADDRESS Z.--Z-:0:Z M'rf4¥<.!9D8:1 /'+-{.Je;-.. APPLICANT/CONTACT Lt:1 I\) n) PHONE NO. -Z ~ 5 ~/ l, (.p BUILDING OCCUPANCY (6 ,..z_. DESIGNER PHONE ti ------ TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION V-N -CONTRACTOR PHONE BUILDING PORTION Offi[_j~ (, I I Air Conditionine: Commercial Residential Res. or Comm. Fire Sprinklers Total Value Fee Adjusted To Reflect· ----- BUILDING AREA VALUATION VALUE MULTIPLIER - ?-077 ( ri>~ ( 45~ V3. oo) = S-4002 I -, .. (~ l"SM 1<-ll-. @ . ca ' @ '54} 0·02... D Energy Regulations (Fee x 1.1) OHandicapped Regulations (Fee x 1.065) Building Permit Fee. $ __ 2._9_,;;S;;;;__,_o_a_· _· _________ _,.,_$_· ------ Plan Check Fee $ \.q 3 1( () $ ---''-------------'---------'------- COMMENTS._:-------------------------- 8/4/82 . · .. :·:· I -I . I ' ._I•• ': • l f . ! ., li_~ ill2J ·10•-011 'l., . . . . ~· .OOR-PLAN ' C - \ ~-;~-,.!__..:.,__~_ I .AREA OF ·-rEN~Nr lMI . ·;-' . . . ·. . .· . . ·-·-· . 0 AcT1TtnN PLAN ' ~t-· ve~ ~t:>1 ~ q r:r--....;...·· _;1~'5::::_'--=o_i, __ Jlt =======f =, -' »llE" ....... . II . . ' II --·..\. II · . 11· ·. .· I .. --..... . . 11.·~ ·. ' . 1i' · /;\ 11 ~ II I _.. sr. ... .. · . .•. i . . . . ! .. ...... . .. :: .. :: =. ::.: .. • .. ·· .. : .. · .. ..··-:······ .· ESGIL COR,PORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR .• SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 tf?t=-'.n, . (I')( s: j 3 0 (619) 560-1468 ~l..:... ..v ,:,,; DATE= I Z f 6 ( BC:? 0APPLICANT ~r:~sg~~~~ JURISDICTION: C A:f2_LS\?,)AD 0 FILE COPY OUPS ODESIGNER ('.'.j -/' -c---r-r-P LAN CHECK NO: 0 ',0 -Lo 0 ~ -....w..,_ PROJECT ADDRESS: 2~ 3, ~~Y:<,ADA-1.-( Av~ PROJECT NAME: SE:CV1CO -Yt-+As'E' _IC D D D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficien- cies identified ---------~----are resolved and checked by building department staff. ~he plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a _complete recheck. The check list tiansmitted herewith is for your inforfuation. The p~ans are being held at E~gil Corp. u~til corrected· plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to return to the applicant contact person. II .. ~,, D D The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: LL( ('IN e, NE H::4,2.:r , d-::,z. t.M \6?:-4 :s~ SB"-I J2l ~r) 7 CJ-Pi.,... , ~ 2 \ () \ Esgil staff did not advise the applicant contact person that plan check has been completed.) ('Y,~ ""ii-+A-l'{ «l'A-\L..l!V(z · Esgil staff did advise_ applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted: Telephone# ------- REMARKS: -------------------------- By : ili /\ G-\ '-S \.!... I 'A-N ESGIL CORPORATION (0 ~>G1~c;1.-_-o I~ 'A-~ \::::.i::=-TZ.., l-1-<; Ho u..J ' 'rl. ) ,,. .,,. V A-12...1 DU'S 0 'Pt\ o '1\.).$ \::::0 rz. S ~-:n ~ -;:.'-< rv1.J& c.. a o t ::;--{2.eQ1 J\ el2" rYiG:(~. Ur)c Jo ~e.-r -m l:'.:.:~7"Gll..)'() ~:.-Lt='PT=-Q..) ~41- I /I,; Lo~e-o--v::> ·12-\-~ \ Do 1? _ Is ' I\)\) \,t-\_. \ r7 /4-~:::, T\+1-'.D 11-1 WU tt L . ...-I. -;5e9v;.,z.:(FTio-r) \5 l\) OT s \;-\\ $ 1==-1 1.5"0 A-~ ~ rJ12.,11;.1 rJ A-L- (:Sg._, --r t,)o, NT \.S '2,i1LL 77+'-E" c5~G y (z) -'r tt'S.5uvV\l:--O .--r4z 'd(JI LD I y1.J{,-l.-371) u ~0.::::· LI) ;q.6 '5A-'1"15t=ila:D 'MY le-t\)Gr?_~L:' Cf)LCS , CL-\4121 t='t..r", J:F r-.,)().,-OV~I ~ 1rV\41...1..) . .-f 'S~~$~11SO Pt2-i.)i.) 1 DIE' @lZvYl~ \,2-.~ 'ftt\ J n 4-1 5"',(a I w ~,--I CTC ( ,2,3 12.k::-c";u I 121= C(:S'(a)9; v '~ R-'' 1 v\J S 0 L--A=n c) n , G L.k:;.--,::}-\·ZL. Y SH-c0 ~ /:;:" J YLArJ {Lrou,2-I Y\ JSUL...}947 () Y?) en../-""11-+E" ~?IT\ X1":> ,~ 2 0 '.DeT"\Or \ \.. ~ \, e 'S-A'-< --u.; ~c.. lE" o< u.; n.s. 11 5\.fl 'DO(Z"".S (\.) ()1 S,t+() U.) i,w\4-~ OCG0-e~ 11 ) 1 (3) ,;-~ Cfou~ (2.eJ,s~-o Su ~ v"',·1 1\T'v,--L (..L~U-1 ~ ~I.-(_) C H-14-"TI: I+'\ ~ C i)1Z.1.:... I Oo I~ A-12.~~C!... ~.Jo 12..G~~ "'TI) 'A ? 1\1..c PQ. \ 'A-TE" \21:::;\::"'~ JLJ::;-:DeT1=rl1-~ I (4) Pvz.o0,ots-" · HvAc.. \/L,\Or,\J c... 'A--L l-J "Y7 ) (:,.... Qui- ~ r-rt. L-~ \ (2 . .-l ::;;-J.,A, ')-P~'S. 1-s'(\J .f) . l:::NC..L: S\:::::~c..H -O?t"\o'(\.)-.S \===b12.. s ;e..77 ~ ~'-< rv1..J & e-oot-= eeo1J1 erz-r"/1t.;:rJ-r-S. ' U)uJe-f?~ U)Y2..,\,::. \ OoQ_ IS 11\Jl)IA-L-lrJ /4-~:::, 17.--h;:::-1/~ 'Pn1WoAL - ) ,I ,' '7/1· ·T \-·~ !.'· '., ... ' '~' • I r.r,, ·.,· r-, , ... '{Y ,,.iv r•' · .. .-.-: .. ,\·.· .., ~-·· . -· ; ,, y •J .. /, (@~· ~--·_,. ·_. International Conference ' .. /· / ; . ,·· \ r/· . .'~:·~· 0 • I !, ( \I. of Bui Id i ng Officials· <> .. . . ' . 5360 SOUTH WORKMAN Mill RO,\D • WHITTIER, CALIFORNIA 90601 • (213) 699-0541 BOARD OF DIRECTORS CHAIRMAN DAVID A. BASSETT, P.E. BUILDING SAFETY DIRECTOR MEDFORD, OREGON February 19, 1986 MAR l O 198J ESG;~. c_ORPO,i'A nc: I 9320 ' •• ti~'.APEAKE D,: OFFICES OF PRESIDENT JAMES E. BIHA, P.E. EXECUTIVE VICE-PRESIDENT DONALD R. WATSON, P.E. F1RsTv1cE,CHA1RMAN Michael Bouse DIREcT~~~~i.~~N~MtE~vicEs Building Official SPRINGFIELD. 1LL1No1s City Hall sEcoNDv1cE-cHA1RMAN 1400 Highland Avenue . RECE·IVE!J FEB 2 ! tJJ -cHARLEs cLAwsoN · · ... ----•· Manhattan Beach California DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY . ' 90266 DEVELOPMENT . ARLINGTON, TEXAS IMMEDIATE PAST CHAIRMAN JOHN E. MAULDING, P.E. BUILDING OFFICIAL LANCASTER, CALIFORNIA 808 FOWLER, A.I.A., P.E. DIRECTOR OF BUILDING INSPECTION ALBILENE, TEXAS PHILLIP M. HERRINGTON DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING ANO SAFETY RENO. NEVADA DOUGLAS E. HOOD BUILDING OFFICIAL COLORADO RIVER INDIAN TRIBES PARKER, ARIZONA SOL J. JACOBS. P.E. DIRECTOR OF INSPECTIONS MINNEAPOLIS/ MINNESOTA JAMES L. MANSON DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY COUNTY OF SPOKANE SPOKANE, WASHINGTON MICHAEL J. NOLTE BUILDING OFFICIAL CRESWELL, OREGON WILLIAM E. SCHLECHT BUILDING OFFICIAL COUNTY OF WASHINGTON H_ILLSBORO, OREGON JAMES R. SINGLETON BUILDING SAFETY ADMINISTRATOR TUCSON, ARIZONA BRENT SNYDER BUILDING OFFICIAL PACIFICA, CALIFORNIA RONALD R. TREMBLAY BUILDING OFFICIAL ASSARIA, KANSAS STANLEY WHEELER BUILDING OFFICIALJ FIRE MARSHAL LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA EUGENE J, ZELLER, P.E. SUPERIN fE.'IDENT OF BUILDING ANO SAFETY LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA SUBJECT: Corridor Construction Requirements Sections 3305 (g) and (h) 1982 Uniform Building Code Ans'd •••••••••.•• Dear Mike: We have reviewed the plans enclosed with your letter of January 16, 1986, and it is our opinion that the corridor system interconnecting areas 1, 2 and 3 designated on the plans must comply with the require- ments of Sections 3305 (g) and (h). You stated in your letter that ea·ch of areas 1, 2 and 3 depicted on the office plan enclosed has a1i'-occupant load of less than 30. Further- more, each of the three portions is provided with an exit. You ques- . tioned whether a nonprotected corridor for each of the three sections would be considered acceptable. Our answer is no. The corridor system is serving the total of. areas 1, 2 and 3. Accordingly, the total occupant load of areas 1, 2 and 3 should be considered in deter- mining whether or not the corridor system by which they are served must be of fire-resistive construction or not. The aggregate area representing a total occupant load of 85 as you stated in your letter would require the corridor system to be of one-hour construction wi.th openings protected as required·by Section 3305 (h). Please note that in the 1985 code an exception was added to Section 3305 (g) to allow up to 100 occupants within an office space before corridor protection is required. This exception applies when the entire story in which the space is located is equipped with an automatic sprinkler system throughout and smoke detectors are installed within the corridor in accordance with their listing. You also asked whether a 20-minute assembly across the corridor where it crosses from Section 1 to Section 2 anc! again where it crosses from Section 2 to Section 3 would satisfactorily divide the portions being served so that each section could be considered separately · and thereby_permitting the corridors to be nonrated. We feel that this would not m.eet .the intent of the code. If, however, horizontal exits complying with Section 3308 are provided at the locations where ·: Regional Offices: 6738 N.W. Tower Drive • Kansas City, Missouri 64151 • (816) 741-2241 12505 Bellevue-Redmond Road, Suite 208 • Bellevue, Washington 98005 • (206) 451-9541 603 \Vest 13th Street, Suite 2-F • ,\ustin, Texas 78701 • (512) 479-8278 J -2- the 20-minute assemblies are proposed across the corridor, the corridors in each of the three sections may be nonrated. We are returning your plans enclosed herewith. If additional questions should arise regarding this plan, please do not hesitate to contact us. TJK:amg:em Enclosure Sincerely, f.i{c T. J. Koyamatsu, P.E. Chief Plan Ch_eck Engineer -l u. -~~--------···----------.. . : .~ . . ; .:., ;J ...l LJ -----·-··---· .... ~ ... :J :~ •• 1 ~I .: ,: 111 .., ca S; z i:J --4 "7._ .; ~ tr\~.~ ( ~ ('1 1 • --;l;• ~'-1.·' t,j / • • I, !I,:••, 't r. --:: .. ,.., IJ f 1··· ./ ,-.-r ... · ,.c)CQ["oclOJ cJna,f I /' r.; Cn \:;i ~ (> r-, . ) .. •..J) ---. -·-· . .-::::-• •• I 1..1 --. -··--~ ~ u .... <· . • . -.I.· i.. ·-(· --. ---·· : : I 'i-••• ,. ..• ~ t.l --1 •. t·.---__;.,.J ..... -· ra .. -::·'·, ~== . •.·) •. .. , .. ) -·= _,,/ the' ceilings shall be not less than that required for a one-hour tire- resistive floor or roof system. EXCEPTI0:'-1S: I. One-story buildings housing Group B. Division 4 Occupancies. 2. Corridors more than 30 feet in width where occupancies served by such corridors have at least one exit independent from the corridor. (See Appendix Chapter 7. Part l, for covered malls.) 3. Exterior sides of exterior exit balconies. 4. In Group l, Divbion 3 Occupancies such as jails, prisons, refor- matories and similar buildings with open-barred cells forming corridor walls. the corridors and cell doors need not be fire resistive. When the ceiling of the entire story is an element of a one-hour fire- resistive floor or roof system, the corridor walls may terminate at the ceiling. When the room-side fire-resistive membrane of the corridor wall is carried through to the underside of a fire-resistive floor or roof above, the corridor side of the ceiling may be protected by the use of ceiling materials as required for one-hour floor or roof system con- struction or the corridor ceiling may be of the same construction as the corridor walls. Ceilings of noncombustible construction may be suspended below the fire-resistive ceiling. For wall and ceiling finish requirements, see Table No. 42-B. (h) Openings. 1. Doors. When corridor walls ae required to be of one-hour fire-resistive construction by Subsection (g) above, every door opening shall be protected by a tight-fitting smoke-and draft- control assembly having a fire-protection rating of not less than 20 minutes when tested in accordance with U.B.C. Standard No. 43-2 without the hose stream test. The door and frame shall bear an approved label or other identificaton showing the rating thereof, the name of the manufacturer and the identification of the service conducting the inspection of materials and workmanship at the factory during fabrica- tion and assembly. Doors shall be maintained self-closing or shall be automatic closing by actuation of a smoke detector in accordance with Section 4306 (b). Smoke-and draft-control door assemblies shall be provided with a gasket so installed as to provide a seal where the door meets the stop on both sides and cross the top. EXCEPTIONS: 1. Viewports may be installed if they require a hole not larger than 1 inch in diameter through the door, have at least a ¼- inch-thick glass disc and the holder is of metal which will not melt out when subject to temperatures of l 700°F. 2. Protection of openings in the interior walls of exterior exit bal- conies is not required. 2. Openings other than doors. Interior openings for other than doors or ducts shall be protected by fixed, approved 1/4-inch-thick wired glass installed in steel frames. The total area of all openings, other than ~ doors. in any portion of an interior corridor shall not exceed 25 percent of the area of the corridor wall of the room which it is separating from the corridor. For duct openings. sec Section -D06. F.XCEPTIO:'li: Protection of openings in the intcrior\\alls of exterior ~t.balcunics is not required. / ~ ......... . .. , __ _,,.-----·--a • The accompanying plan is of the third floor of a building • that is being entirely remodeled for a suite of law offices. The shaded area (corridor) is the portion of the plan on hich a code interpretation is needed. It is the contention of this department that the corridor (shaded area) must be of one-hour fire-resistive construction. The lawyers are contending that the corridor is not a corridor and does not have to be of one-hour fire-resistive construction. They also feel a sprin- kler system should alleviate any concerns we have for exiting. Furthermore, it is their contention that the code allows exiting at distances up to 200 feet without requiring a fire-resistive corridor. Those reasons, coupled with their interpretation that the shaded area is an adjoining or intervening room, provides their rationale that the corridor does not need to be rated. Wouldyou please sort out the facts and give us your opinion? A • We concur that the shaded area does constitute an exit • corridor as contemplated by the code and as such would be required to conform with the provisions of Subsections 3305 (g) and (h). The installation of the automatic system is certainly desirabki; however, corridors are intended to serve as egress routes which provide protection not only from fire but also from smoke con- tamination. Although an automatic sprinkler system may provide protection from fire, it provides no protection from smoke and should not be considered as a substitute for the protection required by Sections 3305 (g) and (h). The provisions of Section 3303 (d) dealing with maximum dis- tance of exit travel establish separate and distinct limitations on the totc:il exit system, regardless of the elements which make up the exit system, and are not germane to corridor protection. Application of the provisions of Section 3303 (e) permitting exiting through an adjoining or intervening room would be appro- priate only when such an area is reasonably judged to be an intervening room. In the case in question, it is our opinion that the· classification of the corridor as an adjoining or intervening room is inappropriate. ~ ::-· I -\ ;i=~= \ J I, i 1 ..... < ::i z < -~ z 0 ~ f,,> ..... ~ 0.. ~ ..... >-z 2 0 ~ u :::i a. a. < u ,.; :::i 97 ~t? ;f\ -._ !,., QJ == QJ ·-QJ > ,j,,I QJ Ctl ct: C TYPE OF PROJECT AND USE: ZONE: CM SCHOOL DISTRICT: -------~--------5 AN DIEGUITO _ ENCINITAS _ CARLSBAD ~ SAN MARCOS --SETBACKS: FRONT ~ SIDE «;2£_. REAR <:?~ DISCRETIONARY ACTIONS: REDEVELOPMENT PERMIT R-EQ_U_I-RE_D_:_\J---r- 1 -:-Jh-:------------------- LANDSCAPE PLAN COMMENTS~: h· 1 ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIRED: ~ --11---+----------~------------C OAS TA L PERMIT REQUIRED: ES _______ NO >< ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: ------------------------- OK TO ISSUE:_.~......_ ______ _ DATE: } ?.,;)6l e:,b ----------------. --------~ --------------------------------------------------------------------------~---- r r r r ~ r n r r r r r r ~ r n r r r ~ r r r r r r r r r r r r n r r r n r r r r r ~ r r r r. r r r r r n r r r r n r r n r n r n n r r r n n n n r r n r r n n r r n n n r n n n n n n n n n r n n n n n n n n n n n n r n n n n n r n n. ENGINEERING LEGAL REQUIREMENtS LEGAL DESCRIPTION VERIFIED?_j-1-=k?:::"""'---- EASEMENTS: __ f\) ____ /A ________ _ EDU 'S: , 44, Edu 1-l,ktJ,,;..., e,_µ:reJ , IMPROVEMENTS: f\) IA-: _..;...i..'--'--------f-.I"""E,.,..LD,,.....,,C"'"'H=Ec=K,....,,,..DA"""T=E-&=--=I=N=IT=-=I,....AL,...,S::e-,:------ APN CHECKED? tl I 2 -t:>/.o) -Z. ~ I RIGHT-OF-WAY:..:=E=x-'-~--s...;..J..;..;,~ ... 1 ______ _ DRAINAGE: tJ / ....... A-. ' PERMITS REQUIRED GRADING: 0 / A GRADING COMPLETION·CERTIFIED: DRIVEWAY: NI A INDUSTRIAL WASf.: S@Hi-d _C)_IL_~___,, __ _ FEES REQUIRED PARK-IN-LIEU QUADRANT: !'/IA:: 'FEE PER UNIT: tJ/A c I TOTAL FEE: ..... A""-+)}_A __ _ P .r .r.: t--J/A TRAFrrc IMPACT FEE PER uNn:i2q0 ~ rnTAL FEE: ~ 2.90~ ·DD_ FACILITIES MGMT. FEE: J\.Ja+t:1~ .... ·111 c+-tet-\-BRIDGE & THOROUGHFARE FEE:;i~ SEWER FEE (CONNECTION): ~ · SEWER LATERAL: ~ · ~\ b~-ff .. ~ u QJ .c u Ill C: Ill ~ QJ a. !,., O'l O'l 0 C: !,., a. "O ·-C: "O QJ •+-' QJ 0. E c:: ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: --------------------------- 1,P "'l-, o7 )<. Id-X /,o ::: 8·2 ~ · ~ OK TO 155~----,,.) ___ .:::::::. .. :...--_-,_-_-_-_-_-_""""_""'_.-_-_-_-_-_-_7'D5AA:TT:TE : _ _,,_,~-+--'--------- DPD2:DPD6:10/24/86 I i I .. 1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA 92008-1989 ~itp of <tarls&ab FIRE DEPARTMENT PAGE 1 OF-/- TELEPHONE APPRO~y (619) 438-5523 PLAN CH ECK REPORT DISAPPROVED PLAN CHEC~# 'Bft> -0 sr PROJECT _ __.,,.S::;_E_-M_-=Q'-'o;:;.._~:O::=.,_ ___ _ ADDRESS Pe9.3i ~l'"A{lA ':1.. AvG. .s~ ,TS" /0 '2 ' ARCHITECT J. Ho\J.IAv-Q f A S<M1MP <: ADDRESS L4~:i U. /Jl.t. a JI! :;r; PHONE ,:;I 3 t.:;'"-(.. It. r,,. OWNER /("'// &M_fAN~ OCCUPANCY 11-;J CONST. ,I-N ADDRESS ~!!JAi D.Lc.t:1n PHONE q, el_{_ t'J I I TOTAL SQ. FT. Cfcl.31 STORIES J. D SPRINKLERED ~ TENANT IMP. --=~"--'O=----..e.7---'·,'--cp---------------------- __ 1. __ 2. __ 3_ __ 4_ APPROVAL OF PLANS IS PREDICATED ON CONFORMING TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS AND/OR MAKING THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS: PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND PERM.ITS Provide one copy of: floor plan(s); site plan; sheets ___________________ _ ' Provide two site plans showing the location of all existing fire hydrants within 200 feet of the project. Provide specifications for the following: Permits are required for the installation of all fire protection systems (sprinklers, stand pipes, dry chemical, halon, CO2, alarms, hydrants). Plan must be approved by the fire department prior to installation. __ 5. The business owner shall complete a.building information letter and return it to the fire department. __ 6. ----2( 7. FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT The following fire protection systems are required: D Automatic fire sprinklers (Design Criteria: ______________________ _ D Dry Chemical, Halon, CO2 (Location: ________________________ _ D Stand Pipes (Type, ------------------------------0 Fire Alarm (Type/Location: ___________________________ _ .Fire Extinguisher Requirements: ~ One 2A rated ABC extinguisher for each &,Doo sq. ft. or portion thereof with a travel distance to the nearest ' extinguisher not to exceed 75 feet of travel. D An extinguisher with c;1. minimum rating of ___ to be located: D Other: __________________________________ _ __ 8. Additional fire hydrant(s) shall be provided ______________________ _ 2--9. __;£_10. _x_ 11. , EXITS Exit doors shall be openable from the inside without the use of a key or any special knowledge o.r effort. A sign stating, " This door to remain unlocked during business hours" shall be placed above the main exit and doors uJ/,,." o,,,L,:-i1fVt 1N()1rAr,J.J~ .., ... /.'.\_.. Cl.ot.n/.l,,lt-c · • ' I / ) 1 ~ ' ~ EXIT signs (6" x ¾" letters) shall be placed over all required exilts and directional signs located as necessary to clearly indicate the location of exit doors. GENERAL __ 12. Storag,e, dispensing or use of any flammable or combustible liquids, flammable liquids, flammable gases and hazardous chemicals shall comply with Uniform Fire Code. __ 13. Building(s) not approved for high piled combustible stock. Storage in closely packed piles shall not exceed 15 feet in height, 12 feet on pallets or in racks and 6 feet for tires, plastics and some flammable liquids. If high stock pil- ing is to be done, comply with Uniform Fire Code, Article 81. __ 14. Additional Requirements. ----------------------------- --15 .. \ ½PNt>Y'A J (1,t,I TnA ( rc::,R_ : -I ., {J/112 -€,Yt1 Comply with regul~attached shee~(s). ,,/) Plan Examiner v?~~dJ=rf/ Date_/_/_. ~;:z_{,_-=6'~(~--- Report mailed to architect ___ Met with _____________ _ __ Attach to Plans SCHOOL FEE COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION (Government Code Section 53080(b)) This form shall be used to determine the amount of school fees for a project and to verify that the project applicant has complied with the school fee requirements. No building permits for the projects shall be issued until the certification is signed by the School District and returned to the Building Department of the City of Carlsbad. PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by the applicant) Project Address: d2o<..37 -?-~ ))/413 ;(Project Applicant: ~ / CJ#i't -e.._ Project Type: _Residential/No. of Dwell _V_CCoo·mmercial Phased Project: Yes • ~-/ Industrial No. Building Permits are for entire project VYes Square feet of covered or enclosed space c2tJ 77¢ @J'...f;ces Plan check or Building P~~-ff" 6-£..3~ Official checking form ~£--d-~:z_;c...-,.~~-D-a_t_e __ //-/~6';-~~r,-z----~0 / I INFORMATION VERIFICATION (To be completed by the project applicant) '/.. I, I} '6 ~ Cl , declare under penalty of perjury under --'-'=..:..:.;'----"--+-+----------the Laws of the State listed above and that the Executed this _.a.o am the project applicant for the project California. foregoin~mation is true and correc,h A d 0 day of-~,.. , 198[.., at ~ FEE CERTIFiCATION (To be completed by the School District) --- ,/ Applicant has complied with fee requirement under Government Code 53080. Project is subject to an existing fee agreement. Project exempt from Government Code 53080. Final Map approval and construction started before September 1, 1986. (other school fees paid) Other ------------------ School District Official: NAME (PR.INT) PHONE NO. ~\)S. 0\y- TIT 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92()09-4859 Office of the City Engineer C!Citp of C!Carlsbab DATE.: (,Tf/NUARY /5,/987 --.:..:....L.JLCl.l"'-'="-'---L..C::;.;,,µ..,.-=---,'---- Mike Garner Encina Water Pollution Control Facilities P.O. Box 1005 Carlsbad, CA 92008 INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT APPLICATION NO. 317 TELEPHONE (619) 438-1161 Enclosed is a copy of the application for an Industrial Waste Discharge Permit from the subject applicant. Your review and recommendations on this application will be appreciated prior to the issuance of a waste disposal permit. fi%t: L L O YD B • HU B B S City Engineer LBH:SEE:lch Enclosure: Application No. c: Building Department 317 Jack Thomas, Dept. of Public Works Linda Pratt, Dept. of Health Services COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL APPLICATION FORM FOR INDUSTRIAL WASTE DISCHARGE PERMIT, CITY Of CARLSBAD APPLICATION: NEW / ----------(CHECK ONE) REVISED ---- ignature of City Representative BUILDING P .C. NO.: 80-0 Bs APPLICATION NO.: 3 I 7 INDUSTRIAL CLASS: 3 J DATE: /-JS-87 APPLICATION FOR INDUSTRIAL WASTE DISCHARGE PERMIT A. GENERAL: APPLICANT: s·e r?1 6C SITE ADDRESS: -9 :;). 3 7 s~ 1·1e ~ t-A r? A cLc, y TYPE OF BUSINESS: ¼-c~~,.., ~ 0 APPL !CANT'S ADDRESS: c;: ,<:/ ·"VI ~ ----------------------------- 8. WASTES AND PROCESSING: [~(Domestic Waste Only (Check where applicable) 1:1 Industrial Waste 1:1 Industrial Waste NOT Discharged to Sewer Discharged to Sewer GENERAL DESCRIPTION Of WASTE (Chemical and Physical Characteristics of proposed waste): ------------------------c,.._., /,,: ., I - 'j ¼-:'~ -~ .,.,, /~_....,:__,.,,--- I ~_; IJ GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROCESS (If Applicabie): ,./'J-~c-;,J ---------------- 'C. WASTES TO BE DISCHARGED TO SEWER: WASTE: (Check One) TREATED: UNTREATE-~l""":-,-------- 17 ----.. ·9 ~ G -+<--v~( QUANTITY: AVERAGE /_( GPO (Daily) MAXIMUM-,,,--___,,,,__-,,-GPD (Gallons Per Day) .-7 ~ /,; ~ APPLICANT OR REPRESENTATIVE OF FIRM: /"/J 1 _c,.,L;~, --------(""'P_p..,,..._ n-t,.....),__ _____ _ , i • ~ a ;-,.( TITLE! ~--<--/,-._l., U.,vt.k '--'--'~~ L--~ ., .., / ~ SIGNATURE: ..;,.--,"'77 _c: {~ ·~/ DATE: I --~ I I I _F,I{ 6 ,/