Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2270 CAMINO VIDA ROBLE; ; 80-348; PermitCONSTRUCTION LENDING AGENCY1 hereby affirm that there Is a construction len-ding agency for the performance of the wor^ forwhich this permit is Issued (Sec. 3097, Civil CVde). *\I0\ 1 I: mZH D Tl I OI > D/ 1 •B ini Han ; > Im i 0 Zm n ooz n O S > B P CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION FROMWORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE(This section need not be completed If the per--roit Is for one hundred dollars ($100) or less).I certify that in the performance of the work forwhich this permit is issued, 1 shall not employ anyperson In any manner so as to become subject tothe Workers' Compensation Laws of California.NOTICE TC APPLICANT: If, after making this Cer-tifippte of Exemption, you should become subjectto the Workers' Compensation provisions of theLabor Code, Vou must forthwith comply with suchprovisions or this permit shall be deemed revoked.. i -••1 HAVE CAREFULLY EXAMINED THE COMPLETED "APHEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL INFORMATION HEREONFURTHER CERTIFY AND AGREE IF A PERMIT IS ISSUECOUNTY AND STATE LAWS GOVERNING BUILDING CCSPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. 1. ALSO AGREE TO SAVELESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILPLICATION AND PERMIT. AND DOIS TRUE AND CORRECT AND 1D|TO COMPLY WITH ALL CITY,INSTRUCTION, WHETHERNDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARM-TIES, JUDGMENTS. COSTS AND•AN OSHA PERMIT5'-0" DEEP AND DESTRUCTURES OVET> j W won\ ui r mI -H "~, D 1 O ^ CJ 3 O — m z mia Q o— 3) _EXCAVATIONS OVNSTRUCTION OFIGHTma CO Otur O O W Mo td CO\CONTRACTORTOTAL ELECTRICALCi ^ -to -H r- -nmmvt •< m m ft V N4 "KJ Issue10 *oo TEMP OCCUPANCY (30 DAYS)STRONG MOTION:x» *N* * ^' IDCopy is filed with the city.D Certified copy Is hereby furnished.OVER 200 AMPS\. > H•Hisr-m TOTAL MOBILE HOMEX oo -n X *(A A 0 WORKERS' COMPENSATION DECLARATION1 hereby affirm that 1 have a certificate of con-sent to self-Insure, or a certificate of Workers'Compensation Insurance, or a certif IM Ittfcythereof (Sec. 3800, Labor Code). ,. \f^ j/L,POLICY NO ur>~ tr iiMrREMODEL/ALTER PER CIRCUITFENCE OVER 6'_ -oXksUltOX RAMAOA, CABANA-EXIST BLDG EA AMP/SWT/BKRV)mH 1 - •etjiV.^O>•CJ•oX3>8s O 7 X ' « MLNEW CONST EA AMP/SWT/BKR &&j A"AWNINGMECHANICAL-. ^? •»0 ^ o<DOa fnrlhlareasnnO-HELECTRICAL PERMITH O MOBILE HOME PERMITH ELECTRICALN ^ 1^ ^TOTAL PLUMBINGKft 3 *\ 6 silljdtf f|!llil!i!lir« n5||ll!lil-s«a$!Ml BSilf'g'ji^li sH^lil2*f Js;; Sl&saH=isl||*3S: ilfffi*HHi! llif?!!!Wf|ifU013VU1N03TOTAL PLUMBING 2J^9a ozH O o 3D >ALL INCLUSIVE PERMIT-TOTAL MECHANICAL 1*7*] • V®i— X Xm § *> 5s *Issue '*•u» oo IssueU) o SIGN PERMIT ^* * - V:l>iH1JJf1^? ^RELOCATIQN OF EA FURNACE/HEATERBUILDING PERMITb O ^1 V' EACH LAWN SPRINKLER SYSTEMIs% •MECH EXHAUST - HOOD/DUCTS< I h 1- C t- t Xh 0 ^s \EACH INSTAL, ALTER, REPAIR WATER PIPEM a ts^VENT FAN SINGLE DUCT*$ *< ^EACH GAS SYSTEM 5 OR MOREBOILER/COMPRESSOR 16-30 HPi EACH GAS SYSTEM 1 TO 4 OUTLETS>BOILER/COMPRESSOR 315 HPtsEACH WATER HEATER ANO/OR VENTt §BOILER/COMPRESSOR UP TO 3 HP^EACH BUILDING SEWER, ^§OVER 100,000 8TU• ^ y-i-i > •3 H 3 V P ^fe » 225<mnX•iiXc30mH33•oSJs^. § P NSTALL FURN. DUCTS UP TO 100,000 BTU4ra i 5PLUMBING PERMIT5H O MECHANICAL PERMIT1 K SoeiSBLDG USE//VDHSrRiA-^cap STANDARD PLAN #uss4 n V1 ooo r N ° ^< 1 C-ENSUS TRACT•nrzocinmOzzCl mUl cz H •o a =H= S NUMBER OF STORIESamCArt*\5*iCv°« T|'^ 0U?f\,JirSc VY » 1 *"DESIGNER'S PHQNE£$<?-. -?4-7/^1 h K N. V 1 >iz^ sJ^i ttl< s01 J \J -H IBif* Sv\ -H^ o * SJ^ w ~i^ *°CONTRACTOR'SPHONE j,^7/-^/1 ^^ oJi^1sl^cz* m : PRIME CONTRACTOR/? .' ^X /s/ts^s7'£*/(i<;i-t/» Ul frsf S \/5V Mm !LICENSED CONTRACTOR'S DECLARATION1 hereby affirm that 1 am licensed under provi-sions of Chapter 9 (com mane Ing with Section7000) of Division 3 of the Business and Profes-sions Code, and my license is In full force and ef-fect.VTV *jfw«3* L - Sj,, /*.} >O 2 J^i m ^"* A ( z V>J ^ Vf- • • c ofc> S ^i m CITY OF CARLSBAD-APPLICATUSE BALL POINT PEN ONLY 1200 ELM-BUIL.DINO LION & PERMAVENUEEF'AHTMENT fT APPLICANT TO FILL IN(714) 438-5525 ^TION W!TH1N RED Ll^mz t/l "Tl• o 1 INSPECTION VALIDATE* REQUEST "FOR INSPECTION TIME: INSPECTOR. OWNER PERMIT NO.. ( BUIL6lNG ^^N^ d FOUNDATION ) Lj HblNI-OHClNG STEtL d MASONRY d GROUT -GUNITE d FLOOR AND CEILING FRAME d SHEATHING d FRAME d EXTERIOR LATH d INSULATION dylNTERIOR LATH OR DRYWALL \?f FINAL / ^^ ^s--— — — VELUMBJNG-^ d UNDERGROUND PLUMBING d UNDERGROUND WATER Q ROUGH PLUMBING d TOP OUT PLUMBING d SEWER AND PL/CO f\ j Q TUB OR SHOWER PAN \\ / d GAS TEST M / dJtfftTER HEATER (\ K/ s\ AL A// f f \ ^^ ^=*« . C E^CTRI(?AL "\ ^-—-_____ / O TEMPORARY SERVICE d ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND d ROUGH ELECTRIC a POOL BONDING d ELECTRIC SERVICE D CEILING HEAT D G.F.I. ^a SMOKE DETECTOR ^^T FINAL MISCELLANEOUS d PLENUM AND DUCTS d COMBUSTION AIR d PATIO d SIGN d GRADING d DRIVEWAY d CONDITIONED AIR SYSTEMS , d REFER PIPING \J 0 FINAL A READY FOR INSPECTION: 'D MONDAY a TUESDAY DA.I* SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS. DNESDAY D THURSDAY D FRIDAY REQUESTED BY..PHONE NO. PERSON TAKING REPORT REQUEST FOR INSPECTION fi/Vhtlg- PERMIT MO I)® ' $Vy TIME:. DATE:. nwwFR V/XX &X>YV^VJ LLXA-./Ot/VA""' VJ l^-^*6-*v-/— L \#/— •£> ' \\ M ar»nnp$$ 3v "S- ) 0 C^f^XT^ ' VN^ V \ A.^X BUILDING C! FOUNDATION CD REINFORCING STEEL Cl MASONRY C] GROUT -GUNITE O FLOOR AND CEILING FRAME C] SHEATHING O FRAME C] EXTERIOR LATH CH INSULATION CD INTERIOR LATH OR DRYWALL D FINAL ELECTRICAL CD TEMPORARY SERVICE [H ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND a ROUGH ELECTRIC O POOL BONDING O ELECTRIC SERVICE CD CEILING HEAT D G.F.I. C3 SMOKE DETECTOR CD FINAL PLUMBING CD UNDERGROUND PLUMBING d UNDERGROUND WATER a ROUGH PLUMBING O TOP OUT PLUMBING d SEWER AND PL/CO [H TUB OR SHOWER PAN CD GAS TEST CH WATER HEATER 0 FINAL MISCELLANEOUS CD PLENUM AND DUCTS LD COMBUSTION AIR a PATIO O SIGN CD GRADING Cl DRIVEWAY CD CONDITIONED AIR SYSTEMS O REFER PIPING n FINAL THURSDAY D FRIDAY •N, r READY FOR INSPECTION: SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS REQUESTED BY..PHONE NO.. PERSON TAKING REPORT. G^""^ * - s~.~*f,Z? REQUEST FOR INSPECTION TIME: PERMIT NO.. OWN E R ADDRESS. BUILDING te^FOUNDATION CD REINFORCING STEEL CD MASONRY CD GROUT-GUNITE CD FLOOR AND CEILING FRAME CD SHEATHING CD FRAME CD EXTERIOR LATH CD INSULATION CD INTERIOR LATH OR DRYWALL ELECTRICAL CD TEMPORARY SERVICE CD ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND CD ROUGH ELECTRIC CD POOL BONDING CD ELECTRIC SERVICE CD CEILING HEAT a G.F.I. CD SMOKE DETECTOR CD FINAL PLUMBING CD UNDERGROUND PLUMBING d UNDERGROUND WATER CD ROUGH PLUMBING CD TOP OUT PLUMBING CD SEWER AND PL/CO CD TUB OR SHOWER PAN a GAS TEST CD WATER HEATER CD FINAL MISCELLANEOUS a PLENUM AND DUCTS CD COMBUSTION AIR CD PATIO a SIGN CD GRADING CD DRIVEWAY CD CONDITIONED AIR SYSTEMS CD REFER PIPING a FINAL READY FOR INSPECTION: DMONDAY ^TUESDAY DWEDNESDAY DTHURSDAY D FRIDAY DA.M. DP.M. SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS REQUESTED BY 77? 0S f /PHONE NO.. PERSON TAKING REPORT. \s -€ / *& REQUEST FOR INSPECTION INSPECTOR.PERMIT NO. TIME: DATE: OWNER ADDRESS. BUILDING CD FOUNDATION CD REINFORCING STEEL CD MASONRY d GROUT-GUNITE [H FLOOR AND CEILING FRAME IEATHING FRAME CTEXTERIOR LATH d INSULATION Cl INTERIOR LATH OR DRYWALL n FINAL ELECTRICAL D TEMPORARY SERVICE C] ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND d ROUGH ELECTRIC CD POOL BONDING CI ELECTRIC SERVICE d CEILING HEAT a G.F.I. C3 SMOKE DETECTOR PLUMBING CD UNDERGROUND PLUMBING d UNDERGROUND WATER O ROUGH PLUMBING CD TOP OUT PLUMBING a SEWER AND PL/CO n TUB OR SHOWER PAN CD GAS TEST Cl WATER HEATER a FINAL MISCELLANEOUS CD PLENUM AND DUCTS CH COMBUSTION AIR a PATIO CD SIGN Q GRADING CH DRIVEWAY CH CONDITIONED AIR SYSTEMS d REFER PIPING Q FINAL READY FOR INSPECTION: SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS. D MONDAY D A.M. D TUESDAY D WEDNESDAY D FRIDAY REQUESTED BY_.PHONE NO.. PERSON TAKING REPORT. REQUEST 'K)R INSPECTION INSPECTOR. OWNER. ADDRESS.^ 10 BUILDING d FOUNDATION CH REINFORCING STEEL d MASONRY d GROUT-GUNITE d FLOOR AND CEILING FRAME d SHEATHING [D FRAME d EXTERIOR LATH d INSULATION d INTERIOR LATH OR DRYWALL CD FINAL ELECTRICAL d TEMPORARY SERVICE d ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND CJ ROUGH ELECTRIC a POOL BONDING O ELECTRIC SERVICE Cl CEILING HEAT a G.F.I. [3 SMOKE DETECTOR a FINAL PLUMBING CD UNDERGROUND PLUMBING d UNDERGROUND WATER d ROUGH PLUMBING d TOP OUT PLUMBING d SEWER AND PL/CO d TUB OR SHOWER PAN d GAS TEST d WATER HEATER a FINAL MISCELLANEOUS CD PLENUM AND DUCTS CD COMBUSTION AIR CH PATIO CH SIGN d GRADING D DRIVEWAY C3 CONDITIONED AIR SYSTEMS CI REFER PIPING CD FINAL READY FOR INSPECTION: DMONDAY "^TUESDAY ^WEDNESDAY DTHURSDAY D FRIDAY DA.M. SPECIAL^ INSTRUCTIONS PERSON TAKING REPORT REQUESTED BY REQUEST FOR INSPECTION TIMF- INSPECTOR OWNER ADDRESS ™ BUILDING d FOUNDATION d REINFORCING STEEL CJ MASONRY d GROUT -GUNITE d FLOOR AND CEILING FRAME d SHEATHING C3 FRAME a EXTERIOR LATH d INSULATION C] INTERIOR LATH OR DRYWALL d FINAL *—*~ ELECTRICAL CD TEMPORARY SERVICE O ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND d ROUGH ELECTRIC CI POOL BONDING d ELECTRIC SERVICE d CEILING HEAT d G.F.I. d SMOKE DETECTOR d FINAL PLUMBING d UNDERGROUND PLUMBING d UNDERGROUND WATER d ROUGH PLUMBING d TOP OUT PLUMBING d SEWER AND PL/CO d TUB OR SHOWER PAN a GAS TEST d WATER HEATER d FINAL MISCELLANEOUS O PLENUM AND DUCTS d COMBUSTION AIR d PATIO a SIGN d GRADING d DRIVEWAY d CONDITIONED AIR SYSTEMS d REFER PIPING d FINAL READY FOR INSPECTION: D MQNDAy^KJUESDAY D WEDNESDAY D THURSDAY D FRIDAY D3^k V/JL SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS. '— b? REQUEST FQg> INSPECTION CL^ TIME:. INSPECTOR.PERMIT NO..DATE:. ^3/fe? OWNER. 3 9 >"• > BUILDING d a a a a a REINFORCING STEEL ASONRY GROUT-GUNITE FLOOR AND CEILING FRAME SHEATHING FRAME EXTERIOR LATH INSULATION INTERIOR LATH OR DRYWALL FINAL ELECTRICAL Cl TEMPORARY SERVICE CH ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND CD ROUGH ELECTRIC [D POOL BONDING CD ELECTRIC SERVICE a CEILING HEAT D G.F.I. C3 SMOKE DETECTOR d FINAL PLUMBING CJ UNDERGROUND PLUMBING CD UNDERGROUND WATER CD ROUGH PLUMBING CD TOP OUT PLUMBING CD SEWER AND PL/CO CD TUB OR SHOWER PAN O GAS TEST O WATER HEATER d FINAL READY FOR INSPECTION:D MONDAY D A.M. DP.M. MISCELLANEOUS C] PLENUM AND DUCTS CD COMBUSTION AIR CD PATIO a SIGN a GRADING O DRIVEWAY Q CONDITIONED AIR SYSTEMS d REFER PIPING CD FINAL DWEDNESDAY DTHURSDAY D FRIDAY SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS. REQUESTED BY..PHONE NO.. PERSON TAKING REPORT. 6. £(x /o ^yfe^p /£7//^V^^I> INTERDEPARTMENTAL INFORMATION SHEET BUILDING DEPARTMENT RECEIVED BUILDING ADDRESS: APR101980 CARLSBADBuilding Department PLANNING DEPARTMENT LOT SIZE :*LOT WIDTH UNITS ALLOWED PARKING SPACES REQUIRED % COVERAGE ALLOWED UNITS PROVIDED 2.SS PROVIDED BUILDING HEIGHT ALLOWED FRONT SETBACK: ALLOWED 50 PROVIDED _PROVIDED PROVIDED SIDE SETBACK:REAR SETBACK: / INTRUSIONS LANDSCAPE & IRRIGATION PLAN COMMENTS:'JQ A> ^ t tf &<^^ ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION RED: ADDITIONACOMMENTS: f* f\ y '"1"%! V. ' f' Ti , i 1 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT •"* t ' ,R . 0 . W . - SEWER GRADING PERMIT n*a"i> »»<»- r.r.rcg, .* ^ • »y ""tNDUSTRI AL WAS/E W/T«W M Art4T DRIVEWAY LOCATIONS EASEMENTS DRAINAGE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ADDITIONAL COMMENTSMMWl PoR -paA,M/v<v£ M4b FIRE DEPARTMENT SPRINKLING SYSTEM FIRE ALARMS ^ J+JL*^A+^* FIRE HYDRANTS ADDITIONAL COMMENTS FIRE PROTECTION EQUIP EXITS <•^* ER DEPARTMENT TJIREMENTS OF APPROPRIATE DISTRICTS MET DATE DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES a Assistant City Manager (714)438-5596 . . (X. Building Department (714) 438-5525 O Engineering Department (714) 438-5541 D Housing & Redevelopment Department (714)438-5611 D Planning Department (714) 438-5591 1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 Cttp of Cartebab March 24, 1982 Beth Reynolds City Constructors 1700 Ocean Ave Santa Monica, Calif 90401 Subject: Building at 2270 Camino Vida Roble The value of the subject building when the permit was issued was $2 , 021, 052.:. zA-subseguent permit was issued for a building sprinkler system with a value of $59,000 Our files do not reveal any further improvements. mblic facilities fee is calculated at two percent of >the valuation. CARTER DARNELL xc: Clyde Wickham 79*3/6 FEB 111980 STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS COIMEBR BNQINEBRIIMO Structural and Civil Engineers ??m CONVOY COURT SAN OIFCO, CAIIFORNIA 92111 (714) 278-3292 1.6' LAW'S W',r.; £#.;;•£ 'A' e \ t »•.— DM1 _ 4*)* 7.0 M tu <* JA) * 76 A 1.7 W/ (\C- iff] «-> - .it A- tt CONEER ENGINEERING , ' " „, 3 i! v// *-\:*"cr d CONEER Ju CONEER SI Q o. <£.* 2, -a. Jbr. VJ 3* ft- fix A - £47.5" X 4 £ u.fco. ~''5' u A - \.\\ Vi, & - *0 ' .f ^ <* .'-^ Mi-d - (,.0?> M- .xt £ '•> 4 ft' .-33J1 tHH JMT-m tf Ufe, * 57-76.0 - Mt 17(^ A ^ 1.*"4. CAM 1 A -- 1. J* 4 CAM 5 ^ n-5 * H.4. r. < * 444.4 f? " i< A *- .-77 CONCCn mClNELPUNC«.^C'lis *• 17U 4 ' A * > X O <),{, f/v -i'i- ft l/U . 3 l.Z) to fli/ v ft/ V A A .(**, f>t Di, Ki II A 0.55 nt.4 91.1 >/, v» 1?l V 1b V *« •fu « M A .tl ISoo.O t-t? /6- e x •** M U A ,, 10.1 .11 0 . 11 A- £4.<; 5 - S- ft. u A. A- 11 . x z I A * 17 1/ V ft-1 M s.go 5f> X A- V i—r—r n -» 'Tr ' " ^ eo i V. ~l vi \o ^> ! •x. NO \T» vi ( c^t-- ; 7 r f-- r- C) 't ~*tt •\ •H- 4 4 -—i— x. ...T v^ i- C UM. 4*JMMA|EV X M V p ^ j T~ — * _ " « 'I ^ Ij Vi **>t. ,5* ! 0- v- \ \ •f" "t~"1 -4 Sf -i.v- NO •o •xC .'.i !Ci Xft ^a*iii ^ r- , i r- ! r- .i. NO "1"" ! \ l I- — -H— T—r u CONGER ENGINEERING 14.--3.ii ^ r r~r T~T~TT^T-I ui o ~r V-1 V ;i W t •O J ~A Cr ; Cr - - f r "**- |1 S - ~<l : ° ; ^ ! ^ ; V ; Vv .. _ ... 4. C : - -1 O !Ci ^ "i~ __f—. j ^_. O i ;r^Ks! <r ! «C C3 -- "I O i (i «) '^1 "S— t • %o -titi\ -i CONEER i- 0» ' T o ^s v-5 i r- S? f.. .. . as -4~ "N „""• i' v-*! !•—I i r- \r t L £ 4 4 ^ ., .7 ^ u u.4 ^ A.^ -- i^.c? < I'? ' CONGER ENGINEERING- -7 «-e.'.*. e x e 4" te 16*4 t' tC" K 4 it . » A. 6 M-t , - 16 m I Z X it. fT<5. fl f x- It O *1 i1 . i -\ > •*- £o3 T \n 1 -c L 4 . j — M«? fix **- {fe-*/.*Vfc > < \ * i- r H- f1 1 V Mn? f- - h* Ja »fi- -HI o t fp 4 fot ***> ^6. ft Mat? V)M. h* i4.w • * t J -if**&'! /I'c 1*1 MM? M- i't* t,40 A S&4 > i.i4 IT f* TT3i^a I I 4 * 4 i- 1 11 - <t ;« v M.t-OMt m I"" V i i 4. ,*/[.' » „ ' 1, it* K»_ o*n. * re <fc v - [»ooynty-.c»/>2e^ . -7 K r !2tf.l~.' j 11 u 7' V' - u K If <J.t 0 &•i /- i (t ti\ 100 j 60^- - - -54 8 fl *0cr '\\; M 6 4' o. m \ ^nl SWWN /If-. X I /Ptft S ECTIQI4 (4VH* *7 SELF RED-HC«> AMCHORt Z EA SADDU. A 1 fi ELEV. SUB MOT SHOWU WR CLARITY ALTERNATE PAJ4EL COKIMECTtO>4 err.<S J>C RMCL ft)? \ + PH1LUPS SCUF DR1LUMG RED HEMP AMCHOKS 51 DC. t 5*3 I EA. S1DC. PC. ALTERNATE PETWL P.C. PAMEL """" x I. PAMCt — X \\ —— - -**r f nt * * a - 4 » . ... V+-- t. A 2^^ ' .'/ 9CLf DRU.LW4 WTO MEAD I CA. CXH. DCTAJL \ P.C. PAMCL PX ClJA^ r. . er *• o . . ( QM, . -T ^ • 1 * 1* ; < i c X ^ > \ I*" . . K vj * " N (A)-\t PHILLIPS SELF TOP HtAO M4CMOKC. 2 I SETWL 17...., T P.C PAUSL °i"* i • It7 *C. X-i PLAM 1 x- ' SELF P« L* 5 * 5 * ^ » 3 <f KWCHOft *i '.C ALTEmtfm£ - {,- - f© "Si T i • 0 - ti - i \ ELEVAT10KI )tX DETAIL £& • LlWi ( PHILHP5 P.C. PAMEU fc)-z ^ PHILLIPS SELF RED HEAD AMCNOR.fi 2. EA ANW.E UEOHWENE PAP f]7 RJM4 X-X EA.SIDE BEN1 Ix \ BtHIUO PAP n n. r ELEVATIPM xl ft- L4x4 H \ »s i CA. sioe RC. PA.UBL CP ^V F - w P.O. PANEL PWLUPS RIP HCAO I EA. V NF.C. ALTBJWTE DETAtL— --- - ii AT GRtP LH4E-- L 5-5 \ (3)- ecur HBP HHAD ANCHORS L MA . _ . - »J ^j PLAMX M i ^._f .^\ •• it- ... i i X 4 i• -v i i | V i | _.„___ 5 .. ^ . ..... 1 ^- — _-, -, X' T5wT7"s:-., j * © -* — t—y^~^-L/ , .J .^_.-_ \;;~ V(/ \ -i >j. / -- f . 0)- ^ PHIUIP5 MLP DftlLLIMG AM PKA FLM* \ EDG* OF ELEV. Y ALTERt4ATE DETAIL USED 1U U*U OF Z-#4- «BWF. Daniel N. Salerno Stanley C. Livingston Pietro F. diGirolamo Skip Haugh Salerno/Livingston & Partners joe Lewis November 7, 1980 Mr. Emile Plute City of Carlsbad Building Department 1200 Elm Ave. Carlsbad, CA 92008 RE: Palomar Airport Permit Application Business Park-Lot #7 #80-348 Dear Mr. Plute: This letter is in regards to our telephone conversation of November 6, 1980 concerning the elimination of some of the area wall separatings in the above project. Enclosed is a complete 1976 U.B.C. analysis supporting those eliminations. Please enter this as a revision to our plans. For your records, we are also including a copy of the floor plan with instructions and a copy of a letter to Mr. Fred Gaudern concerning this revision. Please call if there are any questions. Sincerely, SALERNO/LIVINGSTON & PARTNERS Bob Carroll /cct RECEIVED NOV101980 CITY OF CARLSBAD Building Department Architecture/Planning • Partners: DNS Enterprises; S.C.Livingston, Inc.; Haugh, Incorporated; Pietro F. diGirolamo; Joe Lewis Wiikins Members of the American Institute of Architects • Address: 633 State Street, San Diego, California 92101, Telephone: 714/234-7471 Salerno/Livingston & Partners November 6, 1980 Daniel N. Salerno Stanley C. Livingston Pietro F. diGirolamo Skip Haugh Joe Lewis Wilkins PALOMAR AIRPORT BUSINESS PARK - LOT 7 Allowable Floor Area Building Occupancy Fire Zone Construction Type 1979 UBC B2 II VN Basic Allowable Floor Area (Table 5C) = 6,000 sq. ft. Allowable Area Increases (See 506a): 1. Separation on two sides (interior property). a. Minimum distance equals 95 feet. (95 - 20) x .0135 x 6,000 = 5,250 Allowable = 6,000 + 3,000 = 9,000 sq. ft. 2. Separation on three sides (front property). a. Minimum distance equals 90 feet. (90 - 20) x .025 x 6,000 = 10,500 Allowable = 6.000 + 6,000 = 12,000 sq. ft. 3. Separation on three sides (rear property). a. Minimum distance equals 45 feet. - 20) x .025 x 6,000 = 3,750 Allowable = 6,000 + 3,750 = 9,750 sq. ft. Allowable Area Increases for Sprinklers (See 506c) 1, Allowable Increase (Basic) = 300* x 6,000 = 18,000 sq. ft. (basic with sprinklers). 2. Increase § Interior Property = 300* x 9,000 = 27,000 sq. ft. (basic + increase with sprinklers). Architecture/Planning • Partners: DNS Enterprises; S.C.Livingston, Inc.; Haugh, Incorporated; Pietro F. diGirolamo; Joe Lewis Wilkins Members of the American Institute of Architects • Address: 633 State Street, San Diego, California 92101, Telephone: 714/234-7471 3. Increase i Front of Property = 300$ x 12,000 = 36,000 sq. ft. (basic + increase with sprinklers). i*. Increase @ Rear of Property = 300$ x 9,750 = 29,250 sq. ft. (basic + increase with sprinklers). Summary of Separations Building is divided into four basic areas: 1. Rear property (Units 1, 2, 3, 21, 22, 23). Total Area = 29,940 sq. ft. *Total Allowable = 29,250 sq. ft. 2% Greater than Allowable 2. Interior (Units 4, 5, 6, 17, 18, 19). Total Area = 26,616 sq. ft. Total Allowable = 27,000 sq. ft.- 3. Interior (Units 7, 8, 15, 16). ^ Total Area = 19,500 sq. ft. Total Allowable = 27,000 sq. ft. i*. Front Property (Units 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 1*0. Total Area = 27,366 sq. ft. / Total Allowable = 36,000 sq. ft. CITY OF CA&ISBAD \ ' Salerno/Livingston & Partners Daniel N. Salerno Stanley C.Livingston Pietro F. diGirolamo Skip Haugh Joe Lewis Witkins November 7, 1980 Mr. Fred Gaudern City Construction Company 9968 Hibert San Diego, CA 92131 RE: Palomar Airport Business Park, Lot #7 Dear Fred: This letter is to confirm our telephone conversation of November 7,- 1979. Delete the 5/8" type "X" drywall along line G. Note that this removal from line 1-4 along G is contingent to the acceptance of the Carlsbad Building Department. See enclosed computations. The 5/8" type "X" drywall must be installed according to plans at lines 4, 7, & 9. Except that the R-19 insulation is not required as orginally specified. See detail 1, page 3. Please call if there are any questions. Sincerely, SALERNO/LIVINGSTON & PARTNERS Bob Carroll /cct Architecture /Planning • Partners: DNS Enterprises; S.C.Livingston, Inc.; Haugh. Incorporated; Pietro F. diGirolamo; Joe Lewis Wilkins Members of the American Institute ol Architects • Address: 633 State Street. San Diego, California 92101. Telephone: 714/234-7471 Salerno/Livingston & Partners July 21, 1980 Daniel N. Salerno Stanley C. Livingston Pietro F. diGirolamo Skip Haugh Joe Lewis Wilkins See City of Carlsbad Building Department 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 RE: PalpnUjir Airport Business Park Lot #7" -^Permit Application #80-348 Gentlemen: Enclosed is a copy of a letter to Mr. Frank Troisi concerning the elimination of the ceiling insulation in the unheated portions of the warehouse spaces. Please enter as a revision to our plans. Sincerely, SALERNO/LIVINGSTON & PARTNERS Bob Carroll /bdp Encl: 1 Architecture/Planning • Partners: DNS Enterprises; S.C.Livingston, Inc.; Haugh, Incorporated; Pietro F. diGirolamo; Joe Lewis Wilkins Members of the American Institute of Architects • Address: 633 State Street, San Diego, California 92101, Telephone: 714/234-7471 Salerno/Livingston & Partners Dar,.e. N. L^erno Stanley C. Livingston Pietro F. diGirolamo Skip Haugh Joe Lewis Wilkins July 8, 1980 Mr. Frank Terese City Consturction Company 9030 Carroll Way San Diego, CA 92126 RE: Palomar Airport Business Park, Lot #7 Dear Frank: This letter is to confirm our telephone conversation of July 8, 1980. Delete the R-^19 batt insulation shown @ the ceiling of the warehouse area. Provide instead, "Hoyfoil" type II or equal heavy duty foil, stapled to the bottom of thfe roof joist. Please not that R-ll batt insulation must be provided @ ceiling and designated wall areas of office area according to plans Sincerely, SALERNO-LIVINGSTON & PARTNERS Bob Carroll Project Manager /cct Architecture/Planning • Partners: DNS Enterprises; S.C.Livingston. Inc.; Haugh, Incorporated; Pietro F. diGirotamo; Joe Lewis Wflkins Members ol the American Institute of Architects • Address: 633 State Street. San Diego, California 92101. Telephone: 714/234-7471 ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES Consuming Soil, foundation & Geological Engineers February 7, 1980 218-9A, 3215 City Investors 11440 San Vicente Boulevard Los Angeles, California 90049 Attention: Mr. Eddie Bevilacqua Re: Lot 7 - P.A.B.P. Unit No. 1 Carlsbad, California Gentlemen: In accordance with your request we have developed supplemental recommendations for treatment of potentially expansive soils beneath the floor slabs of your proposed build- ing to be constructed on Lot 7. We previously presented soil and foundation engineer- ing recommendations for the project in our letter of January 2, 1980. In lieu of providing an 18-inch minimum thickness of compacted non-expansive fill beneath slabs-on-grade, the effects of the expansive soil condition may be mitigated by moisture conditioning and recompocting the potentially expansive soil at the sub- grode surface and reinforcing the slabs. We recommend that the potentially expansive soil be 1) scarified to a depth of 12 inches below the finished subgrade surface, 2) moisture conditioned to a minimum of 2 percent above the laboratory optimum water content, and 3) compacted to a minimum of 85 percent of the laboratory maximum dry density (ASTM D1557-78) just prior to placement of the visqueen vapor barrier. In addition, the slobs should be reinforced with 6x6-6/6 welded wire fabric placed at the midheight of the slab. If the originally recommended non-expansive fill layer is provided beneath the slabs, reinforcing need not be provided unless it is desired to minimize cracking due to concrete shrinkage. 10505 Roselle Streef, Son Diego, Colrrornio 92)21 • (714) 453-5605 / 630Mia Vista Drive, Swire 105, Visfo, California 92083 • (714) 758-9144 February 7, 1980 218-9A, 3215 Page 2 Our services consist of professional opinions and recommendations made in accordance with generally accepted soil and foundation engineering principles and practices. This warranty is in lieu of all other warranties either express or implied. If you have any further questions, please call. Very truly yours, ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES Wm. D. Hespeler, RCE No. 26,222 WDH:cc Copies: Addressee (3) Salerno-Livingston & Company, Attn: Mr. Bob Carroll (1) Coneer Engineering, Attn: Mr. Bill Evers (1) r ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES Consulting Soil, Foundation £ Geological Engineers January 2, 1980 218-9A, 3155 City Investors 11440 San Vicente Boulevard Los Angeles, California 90049 Attention: Mr. Eddie Bevilaoqua Re: Soil and Foundation Engineering Recommendations Lot 7 - Palomar Airport Business Park Unit No. 1 Carlsbad, California Gentlemen: In accordance with your request we have conducted a supplemental reconnaissance of the site and developed design recommendations for the construction of the proposed build- ing and pavements. The conclusions and recommendations contained herein are based largely on our observations during the initial mass grading operations at the site in 1974. The results of our earthwork observation and testing services in connection with the 1974 grading operations were summarized in a letter report dated October 11, 1974, by Lowney/ Kaldveer Associates, our predecessor firm. A geotechnical investigation for the entire Unit 1 portion of the business park was also performed by our predecessor firm, the results of which were presented in a report dated February 26, 1974. SITE CONDITIONS Lot 7 is located on the north side of Camino Vida Rable approximately 400 feet east of Yarrow Drive. Although most of the site is in cut, compacted fills up to 18 feet deep are present in the northwest, southwest and southeast corners of the lot. Based on our previous work and our recent inspection of the site, the soils exposed at the subgrade surface con- sist predominately of silty clays (mudstone) which possess a high potential for expansion and some dense silty sand (formational sandstone). Vegetation consists of a light growth of weeds and brush. 10505 Kose/le Slreef, San Diego. California 92)2? • (714) 453-5605 / 630 Alto Visio Drive, Suife JOS, Vista. California 92083 • (714) 758-9144 Jonuory 2, 1980 218-9A, 3155 Page 2 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The primary feature of concern at the site is the presence of silty clays (mudstone) exposed over most of the subgrade surface which possess a high potential for expansion. In order to minimize the possibility of damage to the building resulting from swelling and shrink- age of these materials, it will be necessary to 1) extend the building foundations some- what deeper than would normally be required, and 2) support the floor slabs on a layer of non-expansive soil. Detailed earthwork and foundation recommendations are presented in the following paragraphs. A. Site Earthwork Any surface vegetation, trash and debris that may be present at the time of construction should be removed and disposed of off-site. The exposed soils in all areas to receive structural fill, pavements or building improvements should be scarified to a minimum depth of 6 inches, moisture conditioned and compacted to a minimum degree of compaction of 90 percent based upon ASTM Test Designation D1557-78. All fill material and pipeline trench backfill should also be compacted to a minimum degree of compaction of 90 per- cent. The upper 6 inches of subgrade soil in pavement areas should, however, be com- pacted to a minimum degree of compaction of 95 percent just prior to placing the pavement base rock layer. Fill material should be spread and compacted in lifts not exceeding 8 inches in uncompacted thickness. We recommend that in the building area the expansive soils be removed and replaced with compacted non-expansive fill so as to provide an 18-inch minimum thickness of non- expansive soil at the finished subgrade surface. In light of the fact that in some areas dense formational sandstone is exposed at the subgrade surface, the exact aeral extent and depth of removal of expansive soil should be determined by the soil engineer's repre- sentative in the field during the grading operations. All on-site soils are in general suitable for reuse as fill/ however, the clayey on-site soils should only be used as fill in non-building areas or below a depth of 18 inches below the finish subgrade elevation in building areas. Imported fill material should be a non-expansive granular soil with a plasticity index of 12 or less. In addition, both imported and existing on-site soils for use as fill should not contain rocks or lumps over 8 inches in greatest dimension with no more than 15 percent larger than 2.5 inches. Pipeline trenches should be backfilled with compacted structural fill. Backfill material should be placed in lift thicknesses appropriate to the type of compaction equipment utilized and compacted by mechanical means to a minimum degree of compaction of 90 percent. In pavement areas, that portion of the trench backfill within the pavement section should conform to the material and compaction requirements of the adjacent pave- ment section. In addition, the integrity of the non-expansive soil layer should be main- tained in building areas. ' January 2, 1980 218-9A, 3155 Page 3 Variations in soil conditions ore possible and may be encountered during construction. In order to permit correlation between the preliminary soil data and the actual soil conditions encountered during construction, and to assure conform a nee with the plans and specifica- tions as originally contemplated, it is essential that the soil engineer be retained to per- form on-site review during the course of construction. B. Foundations We recommend that the proposed building be supported on conventional, individual spread and/or continuous perimeter footings bearing on firm natural soil and/or compacted fill materials. Footings should be founded at least 24 inches below the lowest adjacent fin- ish grade. Footings located adjacent to the tops of slopes should be extended sufficiently deep so as to provide at least 5 feet of horizontal cover between the footing and the slope face at the footing bearing level. At these recommended depths, footings may be designed for allowable bearing pressures of 3,500 pounds per square foot (psf) for combined dead and live loads, and 4,700 psf for all loads, including wind or seismic. The footings should, however, have a minimum width of 12 inches. All continuous footings should be reinforced with top and bottom reinforcement to provide structural continuity and to permit spanning of local irregularities. Post-construction differential settlements across the building are expected to be within tolerable limits for the structure. C. Slabs-On-Grade Building floor slabs may be supported directly on non-expansive compacted fill and/or non- expansive natural soil prepared as recommended previously under "Site Earthwork." Slab reinforcing should be provided in accordance with the anticipated use of and loads on the slobs. As a minimum, however, we recommend that the slabs be reinforced with 6x6-10/10 wire mesh for control of shrinkage cracks. In areas where moisture-sensitive floor coverings are to be utilized and in other areas where floor dampness would be undesirable, we recommend that consideration be given to providing an impermeable membrane beneath the slabs. The membrane should be covered with 2 inches of sand to protect it during construction. The sand should be lightly moistened just prior to placing the concrete. D. Lateral Loads Lateral load resistance for building foundations and retaining walls may be developed in friction between the base of the foundations and the supporting subgrade. An allowable friction coefficient of 0.35 is recommended for use in design. An additional allowable passive pressure equal to an equivalent fluid weight of 250 pounds per cubic foot acting against the foundations may be used in design provided the footings are poured neat against undisturbed soil. These allowable values are based on a safety factor of 1.5 applied to the ultimate values. January 2, 1980 218-9A, 3155 Page 4 E. Retaining Wall According to an undated site plan, an unrestrained (cantilever) retaining wall will be constructed along the existing 1-1/2 (horizontal) to 1 (vertical) slope which borders the east property boundry. We recommend that the wall be designed for an equivalent fluid pressure of 60 pounds per cubic foot. The preceding design pressure assumes that there is sufficient drainage behind the wall to prevent the build-up of hydrostatic pressures from surface water infiltration. Adequate drainage may be provided by means of weep holes with permeable material installed behind the wall or by means of a system of subdrains. Backfill placed behind the wall should be compacted to a minimum degree of compaction of 90 percent using light compaction equipment. If heavy equipment is used, the wall should be appropriately temporarily braced. The retaining wall should be supported on footing foundations designed in accordance with the recommendations presented previously under Item B., "Foundations." Lateral load resistance for the wall can be developed in accordance with the recommendations presented under Item D., "Lateral Loads." F, Pavements Based on our general knowledge of the types of existing soil that we anticipate will be ex- posed at the finish subgrade surface in pavement areas along with our past experience in providing R-value test results for similar soils within the business park, it is our opinion that a design R-value of 11 is appropriate for use on Lot 7. Combining the R-value with selected traffic indices for different pavement loading requirements we have developed the following recommended pavement sections using Procedure 301-F of the State of California, Department of Transportation. The recommended pavement sections contained in Table 1 should provide a pavement life of 20 years with a normal amount of flexible pavement maintenance. TABLE I - RECOMMENDED PAVEMENT SECTIONS Pavement Components Asphalt Aggregate Base Concrete Class 2 Total Thickness Location (Inches) (Inches) (Inches) Automobile Parking Areas 2.0 6.5 8.5 (T.I. =3.5 for 20-year life) Traffic Channels and areas subject 3.0 9.0 12.0 to occasional heavy vehicular loads such as would be imposed by trash trucks. (T.I. = 5.0 for 20-year life) January 2, 1980 218-9A, 3155 Page 5 Asphalt concrete. Class 2 aggregate base, and preparation of the base rock layer and subgrade should conform to and be placed in accordance with the requirements of the State of California, Department of Transportation, Standard Specifications, January 1978 edition, except that the test method for compaction should be determined by ASTM D1557- 78. Preparation of the subgrade and placement of the base material should be performed under the observation of the soil engineer's representative. If decomposed granite is used in lieu of Class 2 Aggregate Base, the asphalt concrete thick- nesses recommended in the preceding table should be increased by 1/2 inch. Decomposed granite for use as base material should have a minimum R-value of 73 and a minimum sand equivalent of 30. Our services consist of professional opinions and recommendations made in accordance with generally accepted soil and foundation engineering principles and practices. This warranty is in lieu of all other warranties either express or implied. x If you have any questions, please call. Very truly yours, ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES Wm. D. Hespeler, RCE No. 26,222 WDH:cn Copies: Addressee (3) Salerno-Livingston & Company, Attn.: Mr. Skip Haugh (1) r * ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES Consuming Soil: foundation & Geological Engineers January 2, I960 218-9A, 3155 City Investors 11440 San Vicente Boulevard Los Angeles, California 90049 Attention: Mr. Eddie Bevilacqua Re: Soil and Foundation Engineering Recommendations Lot 7 - Palomar Airport Business Park Unit No. 1 Carlsbad, California Gentlemen: In accordance with your request we have conducted a supplemental reconnaissance of the site and developed design recommendations for the construction of the proposed build- ing and pavements. The conclusions and recommendations contained herein are based largely on our observations during the initial mass grading operations at the site in 1974. The results of our earthwork observation and testing services in connection with the 1974 grading operations were summarized in a letter report dated October 11, 1974, by Lowney/ Kaldveer Associates, our predecessor firm. A geotechnical investigation for the entire Unit 1 portion of the business park was also performed by our predecessor firm, the results of which were presented in a report dated February 26, 1974. SITE CONDITIONS Lot 7 is located on the north side of Camino Vida Rable approximately 400 feet east of Yarrow Drive. Although most of the site is in cut, compacted fills up to 18 feet deep are present in the northwest, southwest and southeast corners of the lot. Based on our previous work and our recent inspection of the site, the soils exposed at the subgrade surface con- sist predominately of silty clays (mudstone) which possess a high potential for expansion and some dense silty sand (formational sandstone). Vegetation consists of a light growth of weeds and brush. 10505 Jfosefle Sireef. Son DieQO. CoMormo 9212? • {7U} 453-5605 / 6X Alfa Visto Drive, Suile 105, Vista Co/i/ornio 93083 • [714) 758-9144 January 2, 1980 218-9A, 3155 Page? CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The primary feature of concern at the site is the presence of silty clays (mudstone) exposed over most of the subgrade surface which possess a high potential for expansion. In order to minimize the possibility of damage to the building resulting from swelling and shrink- age of these materials, it will be necessary to 1) extend the building foundations some- what deeper than would normally be required, and 2) support the floor slabs on a layer of non-expansive soil. Detailed earthwork and foundation recommendations are presented in the following paragraphs. A. Site Earthwork Any surface vegetation, trash and debris that may be present at the time of construction should be removed and disposed of off-site. The exposed soils in all areas to receive structural fill, pavements or building improvements should be scarified to a minimum depth of 6 inches, moisture conditioned and compacted to a minimum degree of compaction of 90 percent based upon ASTM Test Designation D1557-78. All fill material and pipeline trench backfill should also be compacted to a minimum degree of compaction of 90 per- cent. The upper 6 inches of subgrade soil in pavement areas should, however, be com- pacted to a minimum degree of compaction of 95 percent just prior to placing the pavement base rock layer. Fill material should be spread and compacted in lifts not exceeding 8 inches in uncompacted thickness. We recommend that in the building area the expansive soils be removed and replaced with compacted non-expansive fill so as to provide an 18-inch minimum thickness of non- expansive soil at the finished subgrade surface. In light of the fact that in some areas dense formational sandstone is exposed at the subgrade surface, the exact aeral extent and depth of removal of expansive soil should be determined by the soil engineer's repre- sentative in the field during the grading operations. All on-site soils are in general suitable for reuse as fill, however, the clayey on-site soils should only be used as fill in non-building areas or below a depth of 18 inches below the finish subgrode elevation in building areas. Imported fill material should be a non-expansive granular soil with a plasticity index of 12 or less. In addition, both imported and existing on-site soils for use as fill should not contain rocks or lumps over 8 inches in greatest dimension with no more than 15 percent larger than 2,5 inches. Pipeline trenches should be backfilled with compacted structural fill. Backfill material should be placed in lift thicknesses appropriate to the type of compaction equipment utilized and compacted by mechanical means to a minimum degree of compaction of 90 percent. In pavement areas, that portion of the trench backfill within the pavement section should conform to the material ond compaction requirements of the adjacent pave- ment section. In addition, the integrity of the non-expansive soil layer should be main- tained in building areas. January 2, 1980 218-9A, 3155 Page 3 Variations in soil conditions are possible and may be encountered during construction. In order to permit correlation between the preliminary soil data and the actual soil conditions encountered during construction, and to assure conformance with the plans and specifica- tions as originally contemplated/ it is essential that the soil engineer be retained to per- form on-site review during the course of construction. B. Foundations We recommend that the proposed building be supported on conventional, individual spread and/or continuous perimeter footings bearing on firm natural soil and/or compacted fill materials. Footings should be founded at least 24 inches below the lowest adjacent fin- ish grade. Footings located adjacent to the tops of slopes should be extended sufficiently deep so as to provide at least 5 feet of horizontal cover between the footing and the slope face at the footing bearing level. At these recommended depths, footings may be designed for allowable bearing pressures of 3,500 pounds per square foot (psf) for combined dead and live loads, and 4,700 psf for all loads, including wind or seismic. The footings should, however, have a minimum width of 12 inches. All continuous footings should be reinforced with top and bottom reinforcement to provide structural continuity and to permit spanning of local irregularities. Post-construction differential settlements across the building are expected to be within tolerable limits for the structure. C- Slabs-On-Grade Building floor slabs may be supported directly on non-expansive compacted fill and/or non- expansive natural soil prepared as recommended previously under "Site Earthwork." Slab reinforcing should be provided in accordance with the anticipated use of and loads on the slabs. As a minimum, however, we recommend that the slabs be reinforced with 6x6-10/10 wire mesh for control of shrinkage cracks. In areas where moisture-sensitive floor coverings are to be utilized and in other areas where floor dampness would be undesirable, we recommend that consideration be given to providing an impermeable membrane beneath the slabs. The membrane should be covered with 2 inches of sand to protect it during construction. The sand should be lightly moistened just prior to placing the concrete. D. Lateral Loads Lateral load resistance for building foundations and retaining walls may be developed in friction between the base of the foundations and the supporting subgrade. An allowable friction coefficient of 0.35 is recommended for use in design. An additional allowable passive pressure equal to an equivalent fluid weight of 250 pounds per cubic foot acting against the foundations may be used in design provided the footings are poured neat against undisturbed soil. These allowable values are based on a safety factor of 1.5 applied to the ultimate values. January 2, 1980 218-9A, 3155 Page 4 E. Retaining Wall According to an undated site plan, an unrestrained (cantilever) retaining wall will be constructed along the existing 1-1/2 (horizontal) to 1 (vertical) slope which borders the east property boundry. We recommend that the wall be designed for an equivalent fluid pressure of 60 pounds per cubic foot. The preceding design pressure assumes that there is sufficient drainage behind the wall to prevent the build-up of hydrostatic pressures from surface water infiltration. Adequate drainage may be provided by means of weep holes with permeable material installed behind the wall or by means of a system of subdrains. Backfill placed behind the wall should be compacted to a minimum degree of compaction of 90 percent using light compaction equipment. If heavy equipment is used, the wall should be appropriately temporarily braced. The retaining wall should be supported on footing foundations designed in accordance with the recommendations presented previously under Item B., "Foundations." Lateral load resistance for the wall can be developed in accordance with the recommendations presented under Item D., "Lateral Loads." F. Pavements Based on our general knowledge of the types of existing soil that we anticipate will be ex- posed at the finish subgrade surface in pavement areas along with our past experience in providing R-value test results for similar soils within the business park, it is our opinion that a design R-value of 11 is appropriate for use on Lot 7. Combining the R-value with selected traffic indices for different pavement loading requirements we have developed the following recommended pavement sections using Procedure 301-F of the State of California, Department of Transportation. The recommended pavement sections contained in Table 1 should provide a pavement life of 20 years with a normal amount of flexible pavement maintenance. TABLE 1 - RECOMMENDED PAVEMENT SECTIONS Pavement Components Asphalt Aggregate Base Concrete Class 2 Total Thickness Location (Inches) (Inches) (Inches) Automobile Parking Areas 2.0 6.5 8.5 (T.I. =3.5 for 20-year life) Traffic Channels and areas subject 3.0 9.0 12.0 to occasional heavy vehicular loads such as would be imposed by trash trucks. (T.I. = 5.0 for 20-year life) January 2, 1980 218-9A, 3155 Page 5 Asphalt concrete, Class 2 aggregate base, and preparation of the base rock layer and subgrode should conform to and be placed in accordance with the requirements of the State of California, Department of Transportation, Standard Specifications, January 1978 edition, except that the test method for compaction should be determined by ASTM D1557- 78. Preparation of the subgrade and placement of the base material should be performed under the observation of the soil engineer's representative. If decomposed granite is used in lieu of Class 2 Aggregate Base, the asphalt concrete thick- nesses recommended in the preceding table should be increased by 1/2 inch. Decomposed granite for use as base material should have a minimum R-value of 73 and a minimum sand equivalent of 30. Our services consist of professional opinions and recommendations made in accordance with generally accepted soil and foundation engineering principles and practices. This warranty is in lieu of all other warranties either express or implied. If you have any questions, please call. Very truly yours, ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES Wm. D. Hespeler, RCE No. 26,222 WDHrcn Copies: Addressee (3) Salerno-Livingston & Company, Attn.: Mr. Skip Haugh (1) r * tiAME OF CITY APPLICATION EXPIRES ONE AND YEAR PERMIT FOR SEPTIC TANK FROM APPLICATION DATE OWNER QftSTfcQCTORS OWNER 1140 DATE "3949 '5 MAILING ADDRESS Son Vincent e fcl, L. A. ?.'.v4y ADDRESS OR LOCATION OF JOB LOT 7 - Poloraor Alrprt. PX-K., Corlsbod C'T'17t.C4 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF BLDG. SITE SEPTIC TANK CONTRACTOR SPACE BELOW FOR DEPARTMENTAL USE ONLY SZi. PERMANENT Q^ TEMPORARY Q 6 l>l$.(see test ) • FFPAC-r PIT InFPTM) * * ' $t;e notes (Inspect w/ supervi; DEPT. 1<|A APPROVAL: PFBrftl .Tinu „„ LOT *PI IT DATE XEOUESTCD DATE INSPECTED APPROVED DISAPPROVED BEINSPECTION KUMBER DATE REINSPECTEO | SANITARIAN'S APPROVAL HROUCH •.•.-. . . - F!"*!- SAN 1 CUSTOMER SAN DIEGO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH t«00 PACIFIC HWY.. SAN DIEGO. CALIF. 92101 p. WOODSIDK/KUVOTA * ASSOCIATES, INC. •MOINHMB 2465 Pio Pico Drive • P.O. Box 1095 • Carlsbad, California 92008 • 1714) 729-1194 JA ,\' ^ r* TQ^ C/7Y- "'**'January 28, 1981 ' Building Department City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 Subject: Lot 7 -- Palomar Airport Business Park Camino Vida Robles Costa Real Municipal Water District Gentlemen: The Costa Real Municipal Water District has approved the public water system for the following unit: 2270 Camino Vida Robles Attached is a plat map showing in yellow color the building that is involved with this approval. Accordingly, the Water District has no objections to your per- mitting occupancy of the above-described dwelling untt. If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned. truly yours, Y./wbota, Dtstrtct Engineer a Real Municipal Water District Enclosure cc: Costa Real Municipal Water District (w/enc) Fire Marshall, City of Carlsbad (w/enc) Bernie Gilmore, Palomar Airport Business Park (w/enc) Lyle Hall, Sentinel Fire Protection (w/enc) In Orange County, Santa Ana FJW:lme:mtw CMWD 80-209 \, ft fe? <* ^f ^ » I' Osp^ 5 1?^. 'K •-j tiwt. ^ Ka« SQ J;^h«iir» 4 •^ * 1 aA ^M to N ? & ^fj M X^ ^*fe EJ *t fe K n"\? i" \ ti !< tf 0 I nn -H (CHANGES |ruu d>