Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2270 CAMINO VIDA ROBLE; I; CB890609; PermitPERMIT Str: 01/16/90 15=01 B U ! L D I N Page 1 of i p±,,A?d"SS: 227° CAMINO VIDA ROBLE -J- P-cei ^rka-^^7^oTENANT IMPROV™ Valuation: 46,000 Construction Type: NEW Occupancy Group: B2, H4 Clas_ rrt- Description: MFC ANIMAL CAGES 88S89 VIOLA LD MEZZ 2000 SF, JOIN SUITES I AND J Permit No: CB890609 Project No: A8901059 Development No: '-•- Ste: 2*66 01/16/90 0001 01 02 CONTRACTOR OWNER DAN'S ELECTRIC 603 1ST ST. SUITE OCEANSIDE,CA ' DAILY, RAY 2270 CARLSBAD, Fees Required « ^•**V%A **•$£* Ad Justin"; Total Fees: JA'-* **v / *** Fee description Building Permit Plan Check > Strong Motion Fee '*"*'• License Tax * BUILDING TOTAL Enter "Y" to Issue PI Each Plumbing Fixture Each Building Sewer Each Install/Repair Water * PLUMBING TOTAL Enter 'Y' to Issue Electrical Three Phase 480 Per" Y to Issue Mechanical System Authorized by a Permit* MECHANICAL TOTAL *e™t Lie. C NO tic. Status: ISSUED Applied : 04/24/89 Apr/Issue : 01/16/90 Validated By: CD 941-8518 598 5012 Collected & Credits Total Cn r ^ w - ^ f ^teJT^ Mk 1 tJ a t**^ " ^ ' ^ v."' s" ^ *^^s^^^* * d y 4 • ' ''"/*'- ",- fialanct / Utiits•i ^'^ |<*lki\^la ^ ^ > 3.00 > 1,00 > 1,00 p > 150.00 ) > 2.00 wsntgi 3 Duei Fee/Unit 2.50 6.50 2.50 1.00 6.50 .00 59.00 2,407.00 Ext fee Data 389.00 253. 00 7.00 1610.00 2259.00 7.50 Y 7.50 6.50 2.50 24.00 5.00 Y 150. 00 155. 00 15. 00 Y 13.00 28. 00 FlNttl APPROVAL INSP /^L DATE CLEARANCE_ , n, CI7Y OF Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING SERVICES DIVISION 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE CARLSBAD, CA 92009-4859 (619)438-1161 MISCELLANEOUS FEE RECEIPT Applicant Please Print And Fill In Shaded Area Only PLAN ID NO. 6406 04/24/89 0001 01 05 Misc 59-00 VALIDATION AREA ESTMATED VALUATION PLAN CHECK FEE_001£10-00-00-8821_ IF THE APPLICANT TAKES NO ACTION WITHIN 180 DAYS, PLAN CHECK FEES WILL BE FORFEITED. CHECK IF SUBMITTED: 2 ENERGY CALCS D 21987 ENERGY CALCS FOR NON RESIDENTIAL BLDGS 2 STRUCTURAL CALCS 2 SOILS REPORTS 2 SELF ADDRESSED ENVELOPES DATE GIVEN/ SENT TO APPLICANT DATE LA COSTA LETTER SCHOOL FEE FORM crrv P & E CORRECTIONS LIST CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY APPLICANT'S'SK NATURE DATE White - File Yellow - Applicant Pink - Finance Gold - Assessor FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION PLAN CHECK NUMBER: PROJECT NAME: ADDRESS: 890609 DATE:2-21-90 2270 Cam I no Vida Roble PROJECT NO.: TYPE OF UNIT: UNIT NUMBER: CTI CONTACT PERSON:. CONTACT TELEPHONE:. NUMBER OF UNITS: PHASE NO.: Bandana SMtefixtx 598-5017 3ldg,Fire INSPECTED BY: INSPECTED BY: INSPECTED BY: DATE INSPECTED: DATE INSPECTED: DATE INSPECTED: APPROVED APPROVED APPROVED DISAPPROVED DISAPPROVED DISAPPROVED COMMENTS: Rev. 1/86 WHITE: Suspense BLUE: Water District GREEN: Engineering CANARY: Utilities PINK: Planning GOLD: Fire FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION RECEIVED FEB 2 1 1990 PLAN CHECK NUMBER: PROJECT NAME: ADDRESS: DATE:2-21-90 2270 Camlrto Vlda K PROJECT NO.: TYPE OF UNIT:CT1 CONTACT PERSON:. CONTACT TELEPHONE:. UNIT NUMBER: NUMBER OF UNITS: PHASE NO. 593*501 , Bnbg Fir* INSPECTE, BY: INSPECTED BY: INSPECTED BY: DATE INSPECTED: DATE INSPECTED: DATE INSPECTED: APPROVED APPROVED APPROVED DISAPPROVED DISAPPROVED DISAPPROVED COMMENTS: Rev. 1/86 WHITE: Suspense BLUE: Water District GREEN: Engineering CANARY: Utilities PINK: Planning GOLD: Fire FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION PLAN CHECK NUMBER: PROJECT NAME: ADDRESS: 890609 DATE:2-21-90 2270 Camino Vlda Hoble PROJECT NO.: TYPE OF UNIT: UNIT NUMBER: CTI NUMBER OF UNITS: PHASE NO.: CONTACT PERSON:,"*^^^« Mandana CONTACT TELEPHONE:.tMeftxtx 598-5012 Bldg,Fins INSPECTED BY: INSPECTED BY: INSPECTED BY; DATE INSPECTED: DATE INSPECTED: DATE '-_ ^, I INSPECTED:APPROVED APPROVED APPROVED DISAPPROVED DISAPPROVED DISAPPROVED COMMENTS: p\ J LU WJU UTILITIES &MatntenanceOept c M §/ Rev. 1/86 WHITE: Suspense BLUE: Water District GREEN: Engineering CANARY: Utilities PINK: Planning GOLD: Fire FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION PLAN CHECK NUMBER: PROJECT NAME: ADDRESS: 990609 DATE: 2270 Camino VIrfa kobls PROJECT NO.: TYPE OF UNIT: UNIT NUMBER: NUMBER OF UNITS: PHASE NO.: CONTACT PERSON:. CONTACT TELEPHONE:. INSPECTED BY: INSPECTED BY: INSPECTED BY: Bkh,, Ertfeg Fir* DATE INSPECTED; DATE INSPECTED: DATE INSPECTED: APPROVED APPROVED APPROVED DISAPPROVED DISAPPROVED DISAPPROVED COMMENTS: Rev. 1/86 WHITE: Suspense BLUE: Water District GREEN: Engineering .CANARY: Utilities PINK: Planning GOLD: Fire CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT* CB890609 FOR 03/07/90 DESCRIPTION: MFC ANIMAL CAGES 88&S9 VIOLA LD MEZZ 2000 SF, JOIN SUITES I AND J TYPE: CTI JOB ADDRESS: 2270 CAMINO VIDA ROBLE STR: APPLICANT: DAILY, RAY PHONE: 438-4442 DAN'S ELECTRIC PHONE: 941-8518 DAILY, RAY PHONE: 598 5012 INSPECTOR AREA MC PLANCK* CB890609 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE NEW FL: STE: CONTRACTOR: OWNER: REMARKS: T3/MH/RAY/438-4442 SPECIAL INSTRUCT: INSPECTOR TOTAL TIME: —RELATED PERMITS —PERMIT* CB880061 CB880562 CB881384 CB870942 CB890738 CB890928 TYPE ELEC PLUM CTI MISC ITI PLUM CD LVL DESCRIPTION 19 ST Final Structural fim f±_ ^ _— TJT "iTifN "%• •iH _ J*^^_i^*Miyi L 1\ jir~ 39 EL Final Electrical STATUS ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ACT COMMENTS 2= = ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION 022190 Final Structural 022190 Final Structural 011890 Final Combo ACT INSP COMMENTS CO MFC NDS ENGRS OK FOR STRUCT CO MFC NDS GUARDRAILS AT 2ND FLR CO MFC SEE LIST DATED 1-18-90 FEE — 2S — -90 WED 1<4:21 R . 0 1 MEZZANINE MODULES, INC. Widespan Freestanding Mezzanine Systems 37555 Sycamore Si. Newark, CA 94560 (415) 795-1344 FAX. (415) 794-6156 LIC . 1534631 February 28, 1990 Mr. Ray Daily Dear Mr. Dailyi In response to your inquiry regarding the substitution of a center column in place of a corner column with the panol bolted to the side flange of the head plate. Be assured that the Seismic integrity of the system ia not dependant on a corner column. Also the design of the head plates is such that the vertical load capacity is not compromised by side mounting the panel to the 1/2" plate. Your substitution has not diminished the structural integrity of your system, so long as you do not physically modify head plates or panels. Regards, Roth Brashear President MEZZANINE MODULES, INC. RB/mm CITY OF CARLSBAD t .'- . INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT* CB890609 FOR 03/02/90 INSPECTOR AREA MC DESCRIPTION: MFC ANIMAL CAGES 88&S9 VIOLA PLANCK* CB890609 LD MEZZ 2000 SF, JOIN SUITES I AND J OCC GRP TYPE: CTI CONSTR. TYPE NEW JOB ADDRESS: 2270 CAMINO VIDA ROBLE STR: FL: STE: APPLICANT: DAILY, RAY PHONE: 438-4442 CONTRACTOR: DAN'S ELECTRIC PHONE: 941-8518 OWNER: DAILY, RAY PHONE: 598 5012 REMARKS: Tl/MH/RAY/438-4442 INSPECTOR SPECIAL INSTRUCT: SUITE I TOTAL TIME: —RELATED PERMITS— PERMIT* TYPE STATUS CB880061 ELEC ISSUED CB880562 PLUM ISSUED CB881384 CTI ISSUED CB870942 MISC ISSUED CB890738 ITI ISSUED CB890928 PLUM ISSUED CB891271 ELEC ISSUED CD LVL DESCRIPTION ACT COMMENTS 19 ST Final Structural 29 PL Final Plumbing 39 EL Final Electrical 49 ME Final Mechanical ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION ACT INSP COMMENTS 022190 Final Structural CO MPC NDS ENGRS OK FOR STRUCT 022190 Final Structural CO MPC NDS GUARDRAILS AT 2ND FLR 011890 Final Combo CO MPC SEE LIST DATED 1-18-90 ESGIL CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 •• (619)560-14^8 DATE: JURISDICTION1: , "PLAN CHECK NO: C C^ -1fi-6»^SET: PROJECT ADDRESS: PROJECT NAME: JFILS COPY QUPS (""'DESIGNER \X 1^ T*LQ V-,U The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. -! The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply J with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficien- cies identified _ ^ _ . _ are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a comlete recheck. D The check list transmitted herewith is for your information The 'plans are being held at Ssgil •Corp. until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to return to the applicant contact person. [ | The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil staff did not advise the applicant contact person that plan check has been completed. [| Esgil staff did advise applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted: REMARKS: Telephone By: ESGIL CORPORATION \-\b UGA DAA Dvw QDM * Enclosures ESGIL CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR.. SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) DATE: JURISDICTION1: _Cj PLAN CHECK NO: _ PROJECT ADDRESS: PROJECT NAME: SET: -TTTT APPLICANT AN CHECKER QFILS COPY D0?s D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficien- cies identified are resolved and checked by building department staff, The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Ssgil Corp. until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant' s copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to return to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: 3 Ssgil staff did not advise the applicant contact person tha- plan check has been completed. Esgil staff did advise applicant that the plan check has been comoleted. Person contacted: Date contacted: REMARKS : ^Pr^v/ r Telephone £ By ^__ ESGIL CORPORATION 0GA DAA Dvw DDM ' Enclosures: JiiRTSnicnON : C. PROJECT ADDRESS: 70: f A **,» T PLAN CORRECTION SHEET Planf Check No.Cfo ~ FOREWORD: PLEASE READ Plan check is limited to technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the handicapped. The plan check is based on regulations enforced by the Building Inspection Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The items circled below need clarification, modification or change. All circled items have to be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with-the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 303 (c), of the Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. A. PUNS Please make, all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints, and any original plan sets that may have been returned to you by the jurisdiction, fc_. £* - I S> _ — — .. ' f-Cjk*~ —^ ^H '/-*'-)-^. ___ 2.J To facilitate rechccking, please Identify, -^ next to each circled item, the sheet of the plans upon v.hich each correction on this sheet has been made and return this check sheet with the revised plans. The following items have not been resolved from previous plan reviews. The original correction number has been given for your reference. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items. Date plans received by plan checker_r -S -8 ~ plan check completed \\ . |f> , at.T7TXA Cl .? , >-yfc^ <L^ -t^TVe. iiN "VTT<_ cxTTr i oir ^ - ESGIL CORPORATION 932O CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 2O8 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) 56O-1468 DATE: __..^WU - ^^ - S~ __ ' jAPPLICANT JURISDICTION: _, COPY PLAN CHECK NO: Qb> - fa - /^^ SET: n: QUPS [^DESIGNER PROJECT ADDRESS: ^>^-i tt PROJECT NAME: The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficien- cies identified _ are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corp. until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to return to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: U '/ C. 6*m0._sX / Esgil staff did not advise the applicant contact person that plan check has been completed. Esgil staff did advise applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: "&#•/ T^A // v Date contacted: H-^S Telephone I REMARKS: ^fl /1 C.irL\*A fiT^e Art r*^\~<tr~&^ i n I By: O^-org, Enclosures: ESGILCORPORATION CJAA 0vw QDM ST. . O - FLAM CORRCCT10N SHEET Planf Check No. FOREWORD: PLEASE READ Flan check is limited to technical requirements^' contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Pluming Code, Uniform Kechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the handicapped. The plan check is based on regulations enforced by the Building Inspection,^ Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The items circled belcw need clarification, modification or change. All circled iteir.s have ta be satisfied before the plans will be in confornsance with the cited codes and regulstions.Jv**-^ Per Sec. 303 (c), of the Uniform Building Code,^ ] the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. PLANS Please cake all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints, and my original plan sets that may have b«n returned to you by the Jurisdiction, to: * " - ' ~ " To facilitate rcchecking, Plea3e identify, next to each circled Item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet haa been made and return this^j check sheet with tho reviled plans. The following items have not been resolved from previous plan reviews. The original correction number haa been given for your reference. Please contact ">e if you have any questions regarding these items. DaU plans received by plan checker. Dlke ^1 P^n check confuted " By TSAAr. e *bi»-* CiU Twl. Cowec^ > o~s fl v< acV^--lL-'xir ELECTRICAL PLAH CORRECTION SHEET JURISDICTION:DAIE:7-1- PLAN CHECK NUMBER: S? 7 ~ &O 7 L 3^ S f. Submit complete electrical plans and specifications. Submit plan showing location of all services. Submit complete one- line diagram of service and feeders. u. Indicate the grounding system to be installed for building service; X. Indicate ampere interrupting capacities (AIC) of service and subservice equipment. KEG 230-65/110-9. Indicate sizes of fuses and/or circuit breakers. J. Indicate fuse symbols to show fault currents are limited to 10,000 amps on branch circuits, i.e. JJN, LCL. JJ. If fuses are not used to limit fault currents on branch circuits to 10,000 aops, specify method to be used. jf. Submit plan showing location of all switchboards. M. Indicate dimension of switchboards and control panels rated 1200 amperes or more. NEC 110-16(c). Submit plan showing location of all transformers . . Indicate the grounding system to be installed for transformers. NEC 250- 26(c). gg VOLLEB WAGGONER PLAN CHECKER: Q OWEN DILLON p] DARRELL MORRISON 13 J Provide overcurrent protection on the secondary side of transformers. NEC 240- SubmTt plan showing ""Tocation of all panels. ISjfeubmit panel schedules. L6jSpecify conduit and wire sizes. (specify aluminum or copper conductors and type of insulation. yf. Show approximate length of feeders. 1#. Specify electrode conductor size and type wire, (aluminum or copper) |Submit electrical load calculations. 21jlndicats existing service size. [22jXndic£te existing building load. new additional loads. r~ "».24J|lndicate wiring method. i.e. EMT, metal flex, yS. Show exit signs on the electrical lighting plan. Note: Power for exit 1ights and emergency 1ight ing mus t conform to the 1985 UBC Sections 3313 and 3314. 2o. Provide receptacle(s) within 25' of the roof mounted A/C units. UMC Section 509. 2/. Provide multiple switch lighting controls per CAC, Title 24, 2-5319. Any questions on electrical please contact the plan checker shown above, at Esgil Corporation at (619) 560-1468. Thank you. 08/31/87 ESGIL CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619)560-1468 DATE: JURISDICTION: PLAN CHECK NO: c SET: PROJECT ADDRESS: PROJECT NAME: 1 Q JURII LJPLAN CHECKER ^FILE COPY D"PS HDESIGNER^-. J The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficien- cies identified are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corp. until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to return to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil staff-did not advise the applicant contact person that plan check has been completed. Esgil staff did advise applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted: - REMARKS: Telephone By: ESGIL CORPORATIONte-^iff DGA DAA Dvw QDM Enclosures 0>to PROJECT ADDRESS: TO: C A CA. PLAN CORRECTION SHEET flanr Check No. Cfe ' FOREWORD; PLEASE READ Plan check is limited to technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the handicapped. The plan check is based on regulations enforced by the Building Inspection Department' You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The items circled below need clarification, modification or change. All circled items have to be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 303 (c), of the Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. A. PLANS ©Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints, and any original plan sets that may have been returned to you by the Jurisdiction,to: To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each circled item, the sheet of tha plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been node and return this check sheet with th« revised plans. The following items have not been resolved from previous plan reviews. The original correction number has been given for your reference. Please contact "« if you have any questions regarding these items. Date plans^received by plaH checker D»te By pl»n check completed £m A- fS»"\7 ^ KU7-7. •CT- 4r OV-fc^f &ggt>T &Y e»Cf»P- Veft.A_\^ e»Aer \<^ r<_j><rc f^'s. _O£i. - -V a-\\H . 05)0-tJL <r?~, t>KU. 12.c cUX . u A/s-z ~> . -t,2.,.. ; "P-1.3...- J!Q<. 5, /fD a ELECTRICAL FLAN CORRECTION SHEET JURISDICTION:7-3 - PLAN CHECK HOMHER:P 7 - £. Submit complete electrical plans and specifications. 2^ Submit plan showing location of all ' services. f. Submit complete one-line diagram of service and feeders. m. Indicate the grounding system to be installed for building service. J. Indicate ampere interrupting capacities (AIC) of service and subservice equipment. NEC 230-65/110-9. Indicate sizes of fuses and/or circuit breakers. J. Indicate fuse symbols to show fault currents are limited to 10,000 amps on branch circuits, i.e. JJN, LCL. y. If fuses are not used to lijnit fault currents on branch circuits to 10,000 amps, specify method to be used. jf. Submit plan showing location of all switchboards. Indicate dimension of switchboards and control panels rated 1200 amperes or more. NEC 110-l6(c). la. Submit plan showing location of all transformers . U. Indicate the grounding system to be installed for transformers. NEC 250- 26(c). PATE: ^VOLLXE WAGGONER FLAN CHECKER: M OWEN DILLON |=j DARRELL MORRISON 13.) Provide overcurrent protection on the secondary side of transformers. NEC 240- (l4.J submit pran snowing location of all panels. 15 J Submit panel schedules. .) Specify conduit and wire sizes. l7j Specify aluminum or copper conductors and type of insulation. . Show approximate length of feeders. Specify electrode conductor size and type wire, (aluminum or copper) Submit electrical load calculations. Indicate existing service size. 22 Vindicate existing building load. -) Indicate new additional loads. Indicate wiring method, i.e. EMT, metal flex. . Show exit signs on the electrical lighting plan. Note: Power for exit lights and emergency lighting must conform to the 1985 UBC Sections 3313 and Provide receptacle(s) within 25' of the roof mounted A/C units. UMC Section 509. *. Provide multiple switch lighting controls per CAC, Title 24, 2-5319. Any questions on electrical please contact the plan checker shown above, at Esgil Corporation at (619) 560-1468. Thank you. 08/31/87 Datai :/-"&••*' Prepared "byt Jurisdiction Bldg. Dept. VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE PLAN CHECK NO. Ob. BUILDING ADDRESS _ APPLICANT/CONTACT . BUILDING OCCUPANCY fa **,*>* V\ A*- e^telt PHONE NO. DESIGNER PHONE — TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR PHONE — BUILDING PORTION BUILDING AREA VALUATION MULTIPLIER VALUE tO CMP* V\ovij«-L H V Air Conditioning Commercial Residential Res. or Comm. Fire S-orinklers Total Value Building Permit Fee S, Plan Check Fee $ COMMENTS; SHEET G> OF 12/87 BUILDING PLANCHECK ENGINEERING CHECKLIST DATE: PLAN CHECK NO. PROJECT ADDRESS: LEGEND ITEM COMPLETE 'ITEM INCOMPLETE - NEEDS YOUR ACTION N/A - NOT APPLICABLE PROJECT NAME: LEGAL REQUIREMENTS Site Plan [ j I | 1. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: north arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way width and dimensioned setbacks. I | I | 2. Show on site plan: Finish floor elevations, pad elevations, elevations of finish grade adjacent to building, existing topographical lines, existing and proposed slopes, driveway with percent (%) grade and drainage patterns. | I \__\ I j 3. Provide legal description and Assessors Parcel Number. Discretionary Approval Compliance /X_ 4. No discretionary approvals were required. 5. 6. Project complies with all Engineering Conditions of Approval for Project No. . Project does not comply with the Conditions of Approval for Project No. following Engineering Date:Conditions complied with by: Field Review >y^ 7. Field review completed. No issues raised. 8. Field review completed. The following issues or discrepancies with the site plan were found: A. Site lacks adequate public improvements. B. Existing drainage improvements not shown or in conflict with site plan. C. Site is served by overhead power lines (Future Improvement Agreement required). D. Grading is required to access site, create pad or provide for ultimate street improvement. E. Site access visibility problems exist. Provide onsite turnaround or engineered solution to problem. F. Other: Dedication Requirements /^ 9. No dedication required. , 10. Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8-1/2" x 11" plat map and submit with a title report and the required processing fee. All easement documents must be approved and signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. The description of the dedication is as follows: Dedication completed. Date: By: Improvement Requirements (X 11. No public improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or defective improvements found adjacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction of the City Inspector prior to occupancy. 12. Public improvements required. This project requires construction of public improvements pursuant to Section 18.40 of the City Code. Please have a registered Civil Engineer prepare appropriate improvement plans and submit for separate plan check process through the Engineering Department. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of permit. The required improvements are: Improvement plans signed. Date: By: 13. Improvements are required. Construction of the public improvements may be deferred in accordance with Section 18.40 of the City Code. Please submit a recent title report on the property so we may prepare the necessary Future Improvement Agreement. The Future Improvement Agreement must be signed, notorized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Future Improvement Agreement completed, Date: By: Grading Requirements 13a. Inadequate information available on site plan to make a determination on grading requirements. Please provide more detailed proposed and existing elevations and contours. Include accurate estimates of the grading quantities (cut, fill, import, export). #^ 14. No grading required as determined by the information provided on the site plan. 15. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer must be submitted for separate plan check and approval through the Engineering Department. NOTE: The Grading Permit must be issued and grading substantially complete and found acceptable to the City Inspector prior to issuance of Building Permits. Grading Inspector sign off. Date: By: Miscellaneous Permits EC 16. Right-of-Way Permit not required. 17. Right-of-Way Permit required. A separate Right-of-Way Permit issued by the Engineering Department is required for the following: 18. Sewer Permit is not required. 19. Sewer Permit is required. A Sewer Permit is required concurrent with Building Permit issuance. The fee required is noted below in the fees section. 20. Industrial Waste Permit is not required. 21. Industrial Waste Permit is required. Applicant must complete Industrial Waste Permit Application Form and submit for City approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. Permits must be issued prior to occupancy. Industrial Waste Permit accepted - Date: By: Fees Required 22. Park-in-Lieu Fee Quadrant: Fee Per Unit: Total Fee: 23. Traffic Impact Fee Fee Per Unit: -" Total Fee: 24. Bridge and Thoroughfare Fee Fee Per Unit: Total Fee: AJ/A: 25. Public Facilities Fee required. 26. Facilities Management Fee Zone: 5 Fee; m£> £&JL 27. Sewer Fees Permit No. Fee: 28. Sever Lateral required: REMARKS: ENGINEERING AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE PERMIT Date: ESGIL CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO. CA 92123 (619)560-1468 DATE:nl Q APPLICANT JURISDICTION: PLAN CHECK NO: PROJECT ADDRESS: &T7Q [j ?ILE COPY C UPS H DESIGNER GENTLEMEN : Plan checking of the above referenced project cannot be commenced at this time for the following reason(s): \\ The Designer has requested that plan check be delayed pending submittal of complete or revised plans. .*-- Esgil Corporation has determined that plans submitted are not sufficiently complete to allow making a complete plan check. To allow plan checking to commence the following item(s) must be addressed: fj Provide a Soils Investigation Report Provide Structural Calculations Provide Energy Calculations | Provide legible Plans [""[Provide complete Architectural Plans and Details Provide complete Structural Plans and Details r~jProvide complete Plumbing, Electrical or Mechanical Plans Esgil Corporation staff has made the applicant contact person aware of the need to provide the described item(s) in order to allow a complete plan check to commence. A copy of *this communication will also be provided to the applicant contact person. Applicant Contact Person:_ Date Applicant Contacted: y Telephone: The contact person at Esgil Corporation is: Remarks: By:W rt Ui EsgilEsgil Corporation 10/12/84 < £ o CO 0) (Da *- CN CO u u ua. a. Q. D D n D n n n n n n 1 /-V t ,f- Plan Check No.*? - PLANNING CHECKLIST Address 27. 9 O Type of Project and Use Zone Hi P. le. Setback: Front Side Facilities Management Zone 5T School District: San Dieguito Carlsbad Discretionary Action Required Environmental Required Landscape Plan Required Comments Use Allowed? YES Rear NO YES YES YES Encinitas _ San Marcos NO NO NO Coastal Permit Required Additional Comments YES NO Type OK TO ISSUE "C5" DATE w 2560 ORION WAY CARLSBAD, CA 92008 TELEPHONE (619) 931-2121 Clt? Of DEPARTMENT PAGE1 OF -/- PLAN CHECK REPORT APPROVED X DISAPPROVED PLAN CHECK* PROJECT ARCHITECT OWNER OCCUPANCY J .fL*?R CONST. TENANT IMP. ADDRESS ADDRESS ADDRESS TOTAL SO. FT. /.go : PHONE _ PHONE STORIES S.f - APPROVAL OF PLANS IS PREDICATED ON CONFORMING TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS AND/OR MAKING THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS: M 4. _ 5. V/ 6. ' V- 7. PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND PERMITS Provide one copy of: floor plan(s); site plan; sheets _____ Provide two site plans showing the location of all existing fire hydrants within 200 feet of the project. Provide specifications for the following: Permits are required for the installation of all fire protection systems^gprnklers^tand pipes, dry chemical, halon, CO2, alarms, hydrants). Plan must be approved by the fire depart menfp'rldr' to~ Installation. The business owner shall complete a building information letter and return it to the fire department. FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT The following fire protection systems are required: -. ^Automatic fire sprinklers (Design Criteria: /9^ ™?*L A^/V.-^rf^ /-%,/W _ ) D Dry Chemical, Halon, COi (Location: __ ) D Stand Pipes (Type: _ ) D Fire Alarm (Type/Location: _ : _ j Fire Extinguisher Requirements: "Sift One 2A rated ABC extinguisher for each extinguisher not to. exceed ^5 feet of travel. D An extinguisher with a minimum rating of sq. ft. or portion thereof with a travel distance to the* nearest to be located: _ D Other: 8. Additional fire hydrant(s) shall be provided EXITS 9. Exit doors shall be openable from the inside without the use of a key or any special knowledge or effort. 10. A sign stating, " This door to remain unlocked during business hours" shall be placed above the main exit and doors 11. EXIT signs (6" x 3A" letters) shall be placed over all required exifts and directional signs located as necessary to clearly indicate the location of exit doors. GENERAL T- 13 Storage, dispensing or .use of any flammable or combustible liquids, flammable liquids, flammable gases and hazardous chemicals shall comply with Uniform Fire Code. 13. Bulldlng(s) not approved for high piled combustible stock. Storage in closely packed piles shall not exceed 15 feet in height, 12 feet on pallets or in racks and 6 feet for tires, plastics and some flammable liquids. If high stock pil- ing is to be done, comply with Uniform Fire Code, Article 81. 14. Additional Requirements. j) 1'J£T~ ,,un .15. Comply with regulations on attached sheet(s). Plan Examiner na)n Report mailed to architect Attach to Plans •i^Wtfj! 2560 ORION WAY CARLSBAD, CA 92008 TELEPHONE (619) 931-2121 Cttp of CarWbab FIRE DEPARTMENT PLAN CHECK REPORT PAGE 1 OF J_ APPROVED DISAPPROVED PLAN CHECK# pRn.iFP.T A*\ 1 rY* A L_ AHrWITFrT^WK nWNFR R nrrnpiwr.v ftcX EMVI ROM IWB\JT CONST. ^.SPRINKLERED ^TENANT IMP. ~S ADDRESS ADDRESS ADDRESS 2270 TOT ALSO. FT. f? oAy^/A/o U/iX K-o'iit^ STET 7n PHONE PHONE 32^3 RTORIFS 0*1*^* APPROVAL OF PLANS IS PREDICATED ON CONFORMING TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS AND/OR MAKING THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS: 5. PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND PERMITS Provide one copy of: floor plan(s); site plan; sheets Provide two site plans showing the location of all existing fire hydrants within 200 feet of the project. Provide specifications for the following: Permits are required for the Installation of all fire protection systemyCsprinklergj stand pipes, dry chemical, halon, COa, alarms, hydrants). Plan must be approved by the fire depart mem-prior ta installation. The business owner shall complete a building information letter and return it to the fire department. FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT The following fire protection systems are required: ^.Automatic fire sprinklers (Design Criteria: /K tteK XJf PAl\ UAjp£*< MD Dry Chemical, Halon, COi (Location: D Stand Pipes (Type:.)D Fire Alarm (Type/Location: ^i Fire Extinguisher Requirements: -0. One 2A rated ABC extinguisher for each taOOQ., sq. ft. or^ortiqn thereof with a travel distance to the n»«fest. extinguisher not to exceed 75 feet of travel. /=bx_ O Ft- / c t D An extinguisher with a minimum rating of to be located: IS F£ • A-v^A 8. Additional fire hydrant(s) shall be provided EXITS 9. Exit doors shall be openable from the inside without the use of a key or any special knowledge or effort. 10. A sign stating, " This door to remain unlocked during business hours" shall be placed above the main exit and doors . ; 11. EXIT signs (6" x 3A" letters) shall be placed over all required exlfts and directional signs located as necessary to clearly Indicate the location of exit doors. GENERAL 1? Storage, dispensing or use of any flammable or combustible liquids, flammable liquids, flammable gases and hazardous chemicals shall comply with Uniform Fire Code. 13. Bullding(s) not approved for high piled combustible stock. Storage in closely packed piles shall hot exceed 15 feet In height, 12 feet on pallets or in racks and 6 feet for tires, plastics and some flammable liquids. If high stock pil- ing Is to be done, comply with Uniform Fire Code, Article 81. 14. Additional Requirements. TO or IT .15. Comply with regulations on attached sheet(s). Plan Fvamlnar_i Report mailed to architect i "f "HWfr'CiijjJH' ! i qj-^1 ' NAAY 92008 .ONE (6ibrt»31-2121 PROJECT Citp of €arl*feai> FIRE DEPARTMENT PLAN CHECK REPORT ARCHITECT *V/1* nwwFR OCCUPANCY 7rt' .-K. /^j.T^WRu, ^(. ><. ADH Ann 7 HONRT TOTAL SQ.FT. PAGE 1 OF APPROVED DISAPPROVED PLAN CHECK# v,, .fit-.tt-'-.-TS ADDRESS J3 3 "10 ^XW-- ,• ...; U> , JA ^-v. ADDRESS r-A- :f .-L.) Sv /• a"' PHONE 7, PHONE STORIES / SPRINKLERED ^ TENANT IMP. APPROVAL OF PLANS IS PREDICATED ON CONFORMING TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS AND/OR MAKING THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS: 1. 2. 3. 4. PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND PERMITS Provide one copy of: floor plan(s); site plan; sheets Provide two site plans showing the location of all existing fire hydrants within 200 feet of the project. Provide specifications for the following: : Permits are required for the installation of all fire protection systems^prinklers,.stand pipes, dry chemical, halon, , hydrants). Plan must be approved by the fire departmefflprToi'Tb installation.COa, alarms 5. The business owner shall complete a building information letter and return it to the fire department. FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT 6. The following fire protection systems are required; ••-. ^ —, Automatic fire sprinklers (Design Criteria: D Dry Chemical, Halon, CO* (Location: D Stand Pipes (Type: 7. D Fire Alarm (Type/Location: Fire Extinguisher Requirements: SO One 2A rated ABC extinguisher for each i extinguisher not to exceed 75 feet of travel. D An extinguisher with a minimum rating of sq. ft. or portion thereof with a travel distance to the nearest to be located: _ D Other: 8. Additional fire hydrant(s) shall be provided EXITS 9. Exit doors shall be openable from the inside without the use of a key or any special knowledge or effort. 10. A sign stating, " This door to remain unlocked during business hours" shall be placed above the main exit and doors , . 11. EXIT signs (6" x 3/4" letters) shall be placed over all required exltts and directional signs located as necessary to clearly indicate the location of exit doors. GENERAL N- 12. Storage, dispensing or use of any flammable or combustible liquids, flammable liquids, flammable gases and hazardous chemicals shall comply with Uniform Fire Code. Nc 13 Building(s) not approved for high piled combustible stock. Storage in closely packed piles shall not exceed 15 feet in height, 12 feet on pallets or in racks and 6 feet for tires, plastics and some flammable liquids. If high stock pil- ing is to be done, comply with Uniform Fire Code, Article 81. \ 14. Additional Requirements. V , J A .15. Comply with regulations on attached sheet(s). Plan Examiner. Report mailed to architect Met with Date. \.Attach to Plans ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES Consulting Soil, Foundation & Geological Engineers February 7, 1980 218-9A, 3215 City Investors 11440 Son Vicente Boulevard Los Angeles, California 90049 Attention: Mr. Eddie Bevllacqua Re: Lot 7 - P.A.B.P. Unit No. 1 Carlsbad, California Gentlemen: In accordance with your request we have developed supplemental recommendations for treatment of potentially expansive soils beneath the floor slabs of your proposed build- ing to be constructed on Lot 7. We previously presented soil and foundation engineer- ing recommendations for the project In our letter of January 2, 1980, In lieu of providing an 18-Inch minimum thickness of compacted non-expansive fill beneath s!abs-on-grade, the effects of the expansive soil condition may be mitigated by moisture conditioning and recompacting the potentially expansive soil at the sub- grade surface and reinforcing the slabs. We recommend that the potentially expansive soil be 1) scarified to a depth of 12 Inches below the finished subgrade surface, 2) moisture conditioned to a minimum of 2 percent above the laboratory optimum water content, and 3) compacted to a minimum of 85 percent of the laboratory maximum dry density (ASTM D1557-78) just prior to placement of the visqueen vapor barrier. In addition, the slabs should be reinforced with 6x6-6/6 welded wire fabric placed at the mldhelght of the slab. If the originally recommended non-expansive fill layer is provided beneath the slabs, reinforcing need not be provided unless it Is desired to minimize cracking due to concrete shrinkage. 70505 RoselleSireel. San D.ego. CoMom.a 92721 • (714) 453-3605 / 630 AUo Visio Drive. Suite 105. Vnfa. California 92083-|7)4) 758-9144 Q:bruary 7, 1980 f £.18-9A, 3215 9-, -N^n „ o ' Our services consist of professional opinions and recommendations made in accordance with generally accepted soil and foundation engineering principles and practices. This warranty is in lieu of all other warranties either express or implied. If you have any further questions, please call. Very truly yours, ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES Wm. D. Hespeler, RCE No. 26,222 WDHicc Copies: Addressee (3) Salerno-Livingston & Company, Attn; Mr. Bob Carroll (1) Coneer Engineering, Attn: Mr. Bill Evers (1) ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES Consuming Soil, Founda'ion & Geological Engineers January 2, 1980 218-9A, 3155 City Investors 11440 San Vicente Boulevard Los Angeles, California 90049 Attention: Mr. Eddie Bevilacqua Re: Soil and Foundation Engineering Recommendations Lot 7 - Palomar Airport Business Park Unit No. 1 Carlsbad, California Gentlemen: In accordance with your request we have conducted a supplemental reconnaissance of the site and developed design recommendations for the construction of the proposed build- ing and pavements. The conclusions and recommendations contained herein are based largely on our observations during the initial mass grading operations at the site in 1974. The results of our earthwork observation and testing services in connection with the 1974 grading operations were summarized in a letter report dated October 11, 1974, by Lowney/ Kaldveer Associates, our predecessor firm. A geotechmcal investigation for the entire Unit 1 portion of the business park was also performed by our predecessor firm, the results of which were presented in a report dated February 26, 1974. SITE CONDITIONS Lot 7 is located on the north side of CaminoVida Rable approximately 400 feet east of Yarrow Drive. Although most of the site is in cut, compacted fills up to 18 feet deep are present in the northwest, southwest and southeast corners of the lot. Based on our previous work and our recent inspection of the site, the soils exposed at the subgrade surface con- sist predominately of silty clays (mudstone) which possess a high potential for expansion and some dense silty sand (formational sandstone). Vegetation consists of a light growth of weeds and brush. 105Q5PoseffeSfree/. Son D:ego. Co'i'o«nc 92)21 • f71<i ^53-5605 / 630 A/JO Vrsfo Drive, Su"e ?05. Visia. California 92083 •(?}£} 75S-91-" January 2, 1980 218-9A, 3155 Page 2 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The primary feature of concern at the site is the presence of silty clays (mudstone) exposed over most of the subgrade surface which possess a high potential for expansion. In order to minimize the possibility of damage to the building resulting from swelling and shrink- age of these materials, it will be necessary to 1) extend the building foundations some- what deeper than would normally be required, and 2) support the floor slabs on a layer of non-expansive soil. Detailed earthwork and foundation recommendations are presented in the following paragraphs. A. Site Earthwork Any surface vegetation, trash and debris that may be present at the time of construction should be removed and disposed of off-site. The exposed soils in all areas to receive structural fill, pavements or building improvements should be scarified to a minimum depth of 6 inches, moisture conditioned and compacted to a minimum degree of compaction of 90 percent based upon ASTM Test Designation D1557-78. AN fill material and pipeline trench backfill should also be compacted to a minimum degree of compaction of 90 per- cent. The upper 6 inches of subgrode soil in pavement areas should, however, be com- pacted to a minimum degree of compaction of 95 percent just prior to placing the pavement base rock layer. Fill material should be spread and compacted in lifts not exceeding 8 inches In uncompacted thickness. We recommend that in the building area the expansive soils be removed and replaced with compacted non-expansive fill so as to provide an 18-Inch minimum thickness of non- expansive soil at the finished subgrade surface. In light of the fact that in some areas dense formational sandstone is exposed at the subgrade surface, the exact aeral extent and depth of removal of expansive soil should be determined by the soil engineer's repre- sentative in the field during the grading operations. All on-slte soils are in general suitable for reuse as fill, however, the clayey on-slte soils should only be used as fill In non-building areas or below a depth of 18 inches below the finish subgrade elevation in building areas. Imported fill material should be a non-expansive granular soil with a plasticity index of 12 or less. In addition, both imported and existing on-site soils for use as fill should not contain rocks or lumps over 8 Inches in greatest dimension with no more than 15 percent larger than 2.5 inches. Pipeline trenches should be backfilled with compacted structural fill. Backfill material should be placed in lift thicknesses appropriate to the type of compaction equipment utilized and compacted by mechanical means to a minimum degree of compaction of 90 percent. In pavement areas, that portion of the trench backfill within the pavement section should conform to the material and compaction requirements of the adjacent pave- ment section. In addition, the Integrity of the non-expansive soil layer should be main- tained In building areas. January 2, 1980 218-9A, 3155 Page 3 Variations in soil conditions are possible and may be encountered during construction. In order to permit correlation between the preliminary soil data and the actual soil conditions encountered during construction/ and to assure conformance with the plans and specifica- tions as originally contemplated, it is essential that the soil engineer be retained to per- form on-site review during the course of construction. B. Foundations We recommend that the proposed building be supported on conventional, individual spread and/or continuous perimeter footings bearing on firm natural soil and/or compacted fill materials. Footings should be founded at least 24 inches below the lowest adjacent fin- ish grade. Footings located adjacent to the tops of slopes should be extended sufficiently deep so as to provide at least 5 feet of horizontal cover between the footing and the slope face at the footing bearing level. AiJfhese recommended depths, footings may be designed for allowable bearing pressures of S/SOufapunds per square foot (psf) for combined dead and live loads, and 4,700 psf for all loads, including wind or seismic. The footings should, however, have a minimum width of 12 inches. All continuous footings should be reinforced with top and bottom reinforcement to provide structural continuity and to permit spanning of local irregularities. Post-construction differential settlements across the building are expected to be within tolerable limits for the structure. C. Slabs-On-Grode Building floor slabs may be supported directly on non-expansive compacted fill and/or non- expansive natural soil prepared as recommended previously under "Site Earthwork." Slab reinforcing should be provided in accordance with the anticipated use of and loads on the slabs, As a minimum, however, we recommend that the slabs be reinforced with 6x6-10/10 wire mesh for control of shrinkage cracks. In areas where moisture-sensitive floor coverings are to be utilized and in other areas where floor dampness would be undesirable, we recommend that consideration be given to providing an impermeable membrane beneath the slabs. The membrane should be covered with 2 Inches of sand to protect It during construction. The sand should be lightly moistened just prior to placing the concrete. D. Lateral Loads Lateral load resistance for building foundations and retaining walls may be developed in friction between the base of the foundations and the supporting subgrade. An allowable friction coefficient of 0.35 is recommended for use In design.. An additional allowable passive pressure equal to an equivalent fluid weight of 250 pounds per cubic foot acting against the foundations may be used in design provided the footings are poured neat against undisturbed soil. These allowable values are based on a safety factor of 1.5 applied to the ultimate values. January 2, 1980 218-9A, 3155 Page 4 E. Retaining Wall According to an undated site plan, an unrestrained (cantilever) retaining wall will be constructed along the existing 1-1/2 (horizontal) to 1 (vertical) slope which borders the east property boundry. We recommend that the wall be designed for an equivalent fluid pressure of 60 pounds per cubic foot. The preceding design pressure assumes that there Is sufficient drainage behind the wall to prevent the build-up of hydrostatic pressures from surface water infiltration. Adequate drainage may be provided by means of weep holes with permeable material installed behind the wall or by means of a system of subdrains. Backfill placed behind the wall should be compacted to a minimum degree of compaction of 90 percent using light compaction equipment. If heavy equipment is used, the wall should be appropriately temporarily braced. The retaining wall should be supported on footing foundations designed in accordance with the recommendations presented previously under Item B., "Foundations." Lateral load resistance for the wall can be developed in accordance with the recommendations presented under Item D., "Lateral Loads." F, Pavements Based on our general knowledge of the types of existing soil that we anticipate will be ex- posed at the finish subgrade surface in pavement areas along with our past experience in providing R-value test results for similar soils within the business park, it is our opinion that a design R-vatue of 11 is appropriate for use on Lot 7. Combining the R~va!ue with selected traffic indices for different pavement loading requirements we have developed the following recommended pavement sections using Procedure 301-F of the State of California, Department of Transportation. The recommended pavement sections contained in Table 1 should provide a pavement life of 20 years with a normal amount of flexible pavement maintenance. TABLE 1 - RECOMMENDED PAVEMENT SECTIONS Pavement Components Asphalt Aggregate Base Concrete Class 2 Total Thickness Location (Inches) (Inches) (Inches) Automobile Parking Areas 2.0 6.5 8.5 (T.I. =3.5 for 20-year life) Traffic Channels and areas subject 3.0 9.0 12.0 to occasional heavy vehicular loads such as would be imposed by trash trucks. (T.I. = 5.0 for 20-year life) January 2, 1980 218-9A, 3155 Page 5 Asphalt concrete. Class 2 aggregate base, and preparation of the base rock layer and subgrade should conform to and be placed in accordance with the requirements of the Slate of California, Department of Transportation, Standard Specifications, January 1978 edition, except that the test method for compaction should be determined by ASTM D1557- 78. Preparation of the subgrade and placement of the base material should be performed under the observation of the soil engineer's representative. If decomposed granite Is used in lieu of Class 2 Aggregate Base, the asphalt concrete thick- nesses recommended in the preceding table should be increased by 1/2 inch. Decomposed granite for use as base material should have a minimum R-value of 73 and a minimum sand equivalent of 30. Our services consist of professional opinions and recommendations made in accordance with generally accepted soil and foundation engineering principles and practices. This warranty is in lieu of all other warranties either express or implied. \ If you have any questions, please call. Very truly yours, ROBERT PRATER ASSOCIATES Wm. D. Hespeler, RCE No. 26,222 WDHrcn Copies: Addressee (3) Salerno-Livingston & Company, Attn.: Mr. Skip Haugh (1) JOB N0_ CNUINCER- ZORAH £. SHBFFNER LO* *t*»tvi»- CALIFORNIA SHEET NO J 2, ^c ^ i»r f- a f fe* j / /'r<? 7. (x> y J'.// 3 o/f £-3 ft'* £ _i (i J-/ J-- / •if- Al i *->. -H ^ 2 S0L0" - . > zi**(i**)] ^ ^ 2 JT . AS •- i! H > «, 77^ -£3&*/st f "^ 3 1 JOB NO__ ENGINCER. ZORAH E. SHEFFNER COM«UlTlNa •TNUCTUMAL INAINH*DATC. SHKCT NO // t4 9- - L 0. 4 44 2. 4.1. ^/ - 2 2- /f ..x ^4/47): Jo/s/3 J-J J P - r % 6 " C » 22, Jo/?- 'A' " / / iz% ^- A / •e-i KG* -e- o->-o- A) Jo, t u-*lr II o /~ ft/C,(>"rf'xljfy,' Til? / • I t 2 o c J j /5 /V<? A- 1 a If" $*44** '4 - > /r *-. J// P /<*- 21> 4^ -x>- -f .e3 ^ ^ -.13 *^* ;v« VA V po K /<.</ Afi • as /- r?</-A A.Lee* 4 2 * 0 ~ \ 'X»C ; ____ J? " A ^ o*»<. /^»v n United States Testing Company, Inc. Engineering & Support Services '---•it' Ki:nz S'reet S3^ D'ajo CA 9*110 ,rfc19; S25-93 ; ftNlNft. ENVlflONMENI'*OJE:I ce7e KKINQ VID& ROSLE) yiofi P;-^ *: CARLSBAD Cfi 9£* Cft 9c*^ TEST RESULTS sw Vido ^-bles Ca!-J = H? .^J:1',^: Co*piHesMve strength on 3, £.75 i*. wrss C'Ltaiwd by o^r fim; or. Itecesaer c9, I%3. I ftuoal etwloment, Suite I (total uortatop B ftriul gtwiongfit, Suit? i Metal workshop area slat, 3 feiMl WtviOfxent, S«ite ! Metal **ork^»f area tlafe. ie st^ngkh wa-=> specified io fce 3^^ -':-! ar^rt'.th ar& loratio^a ar^S Utt rs-td-> 3 cwci'-e-tf: •:ov-e* hhi^h wt-e tested zr\ Ji^Ud'11) 5 l^, Core t OCflT IONS location -i.L ENVIRONMENT:: TEL Nc . 619-438-0370 United States Testing Company, Inc. Engineering & Support Services ^3467 Kur.; Slreel, S*'< Dtega C* 92110 '61$) 225-ft641 Length, I ' COMPftES&IVE STREN&TH Tested In flccordarKe tots Test Ketho-a ASTfl C-4i 1^1 *d) 5,f 5,54 5,% Inched . 5.« , Inches £.75 £.75 U95 it S^tfi'-e inches 5.54 .oao, Poutfs £9,36* 27,43* 29, Strentr PSI ,9M 4,&2* 4,934 .9B7 .996 ,9% Cwpressive Strertgth Ktic/PSl"" ^'L 4,88* 4,6» 4,9i» Sfvxid yoj have any quest i9t office. Thank ycu, J, S. TESTIN5 COMPfiMY, m; this '"t^i% please i!_ ENVIRONMENTS TEL No . ^19-438-0370 Jen 9,50 16:^ 1)0.001 p.03 United States Testing Company, Inc. Engineering & Support Services "3467 K'.-tz S!rt«, Sv. Diego. Oft 92110 ;"6^9: 2£'5-9&*> SuMdi/ of ftctivity Cate Task ftcbr^viited Description Code i^/es fei'ss tcs!"Ns"fE:HN:t:w s EQUIPMENT *^3i JSCKS, SHAN 1/15/90 Mike: Permit 881383 to add 4000 sf expired in July, 1989. Plan Check 89-609 has many promises including last one that building permit would be obtained by 1/12. A correction list was mailed on 11/16/89 and that's the last we've heard. During the time Daily failed to get inspection on his first permit, he built a mezzanine and has failed to complete his 9 month old plancheck. H4 operations being conducted under the mezz. TECHNICALLY HE HAS NO PERMIT TO OCCUPY THE PREMISES, MUCH LESS CONDUCT H OCCUPATION, HE IS PLAYING US AND HAS BEEN FOR NINE MONTHS. HOW CAN WE GET ACTION? Carter 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE • ^C^, • TELEPHONE CARLSBAD, CA 92009-4859 M^O/ <SM (619) 438-1161 Cttp of Cartebab DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING SERVICES Date: October 25, 1989 To: Ray Daily • PC#: 89-609 Dated: 4/24/89 2270 Camino Vida Roble #1 Carlsbad, CA 92009 Subject: Plan Check Expiration Dear Sir: The plan check for your project at: 2270 Camino Vida Roble #1 has become null and void due to limitation of time on: 4/24/89 • The provisions of Section 304 (c) of the Uniform Building Code states: Sec. 304 (c) Expiration of Plan Check. Applications for which no permit is issued within 180 days following the date of application shall expire by limitation and plans submitted for checking may thereafter be returned to the applicant or destroyed by the Building Official. The Building Official may extend the time for action by the applicant for a period not exceeding 180 days upon written request by the applicant showing that circumstances beyond the control of the applicant have prevented action from being taken. In order to renew action on an application after expiration, the applicant shall resubmit plans and pay a new plan check fee. We will hold your plans for 10 days at our office for you to pick up, after which time they will be destroyed. If you have any questions, please contact the Carlsbad Building Department at 438-1161. MARTY ORENYAK Building Official MO:jb cc: M. Harrington, Code Enforcement City of Carlsbad Building Department CKR'llMKD October 25, 1989 Raymond P. Daily Animal Environments Raymond P. Daily Enterprises 2270 Camino Vida Roble, Suite I Carlsbad, CA 92009 NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND ORDER TO REMOVE 2270 CAMINO VIDA ROBLE, SUITE I Plan Check application number 89-609 has expired. See copy of attached letters regarding the Plan Check. You are hereby notified that you are in violation of the following Carlsbad Municipal Code Sections: 18.04.010 Construction of tenant improvement without proper approval and permit. 18.08.010 Installation of mechanical equipment without proper approval or permit 18.12.080 Installation of electrical wiring and equipment without proper approval and permit. You are hereby ordered to be in full compliance with the provisions of the Carlsbad Municipal Code no later than November 5, 1989. This matter will be referred to the City Attorney's Office for further legal action if you fail to comply by the above referenced date. If you have any questions regarding this notice, contact the undersigned at 438-1161. [CHAEL A. HARRINGTON Code Enforcement Officer c: City Attorney Carter Darnell Building Permit File Enclosure 2O75 Las Palmas Drive-Carlsbad, California 92OO9-4859»(619) 438-1161 S&Xugust 31, 1989 TO:Ray Daily 2270 Camino Victa Roble Ste Carlsbad, CA 92009 ^S^^^O^ffiHHSM^^£SAiiii^ji^ PC# 89-GQ9 DATE: 4/24/89 PLAN CHECK EXPIRATION Our records indicate that you have not obtained your building permit for which you filed an application on the date shown above. The provisions of Section 304(c) of the Uniform Building Code state: Section 304(c) Expiration of Plan Check. Application for which no permit is issued within 180 days following the date of application shall expire by limitation and plans submitted for checking thereafter be returned to the applicant or destroyed by the Building Official. The Building Official may extend'the time for action by the applicant for a period not exceeding 180 days upon written request by the- applicant showing that circumstances beyond the control of the applicant have prevented action from being taken. In order to renew action on an application after expiration, the applicant shall resubmit plans and pay a new plan check fee. For your convenience, please check the appropriate box below indicating your intentions and return this letter to the address above. Project abandoned. I will pick up plans within 10 days. Signature: Date: Project abandoned; plans may be destroyed. Signature: Maximum 180-day time extension re, reasons: ^\ or the following &^ \ If you have any questions, please contact the Carlsbad Development Processing Section at (619) 438-1161. r DORIS COSMAN Building Department 2O75 Las Palmas Drive * Carlsbad, California 92OO9-4-859 • (6 1 9) -43^-1 161 City of Carlsbad Building Department CERTIFIED August 23, 1989 Raymond P. Daily Animal Environments Raymond P. Daily Enterprises 2270 Camino Vida Roble, Suite I Carlsbad, CA 92009 NOTICE OF VIOLATION 2270 CAMINO VIDA ROBLE, SUITE I It has come to my attention that a tenant improvement has been constructed at the above- referenced address without approval or a valid Building Permit. This is a violation of Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.04.010, Uniform Building Code Section 301(a). This office is aware of your Plan Check application number 89-609, and a delay on your part to submit correct and complete plans. This letter is to inform you that completed plans must be submitted and permits obtained by September 14, 1989 or this Office will proceed with action to have the immediate removal of the tenant improvement. If you have any questions regarding this notice, contact the undersigned at 438-1161. UCHAEL A. HARRINGTON Code Enforcement Officer c:City Attorney Fire Marshal Plan Check File 2O75 Las Palmas Drive»Carlsbad, California 92OO9-4859-(619) 438-1161 City of Carlsbad August 2, 1989 Ray Daily Animal Environments 2270 Camlno Vida Roble Carlsbad, Ca 92009 Plan Check 89-609 A plan check correction list mailed to you July 3, 1989 lists. 18 building plan corrections, four mechanical/plumbing corrections and ten electrical plan corrections. The plan checker has also commented: "Plans as provided are very incomplete. More corrections may be necessary when complete and consistent plans are provided". Your plans were submitted in response to a violation. The work had been done without permits. It has now been one month since you received this correction list. The Fire Department has also mailed you a correction list and has had no response. In the meantime employees continue to work in this unapproved environment. Please consider the liability you are incurring, and do whatever is necessary to submit a good set of plans with all corrections. We ^me, if a resubmission is not made by August 15, that you do not ynsh to respond, and we will take appropriate action. CARTER DARNELL c: Jim Harris Wayne Morgan Mike Harrington 2O75 Las Palmas Drive - Carlsbad, California 92OO9-4859 • (61 9) 438-116-1 of Carlsbad Building Department August 23, 1989 Raymond P. Daily Animal Environments Raymond P. Daily Enterprises 2270 Camino Vida Roblc, Suite I Carlsbad, CA 92009 CERTIFIED 9/13/89 Mr Sheffner, Mechanical Engineer said he would be in San Diego four days starting Sept 27 and would solve all. I told him I would ask you to postpone your action until 9/30. Carterr/ic-n NOTICE OF VIOLATION 2270 CAMINO VIDA ROBLE, SUITE I It has come to my attention that a tenant improvement has been constructed at the above- referenced address without approval or a valid Building Permit. This is a violation of Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.04.010, Uniform Building Code Section 301(a). This office is aware of your Plan Check application number 89-609, and a delay on your part to submit correct and complete plans. This letter is to inform you that completed plans must be submitted and permits obtained by September 14, 1989 or this Office will proceed with action to have the immediate removal of the tenant improvement. If you have any questions regarding this notice, contact the undersigned at 438-1161. IICHAEL A. HARRINGTON Code Enforcement Officer c:City Attorney Fire Marshal -/Plan Check File 2O75 Las Palmas Drive-Carlsbad, California 92OO9-4859*(619) 438-1161 City of Carlsbad Community Development August 2, 1989 Ray Daily Animal Environments 2270 Camino Vida Roble Carlsbad, Ca 92009 Plan Check 89-609 A plan check correction 11st mailed to you July 3, 1989 lists 18 building plan corrections, four mechanical/plumbing corrections and ten electrical plan corrections. The plan checker has also commented: "Plans as provided are very incomplete. More corrections may be necessary when complete and consistent plans are provided". Your plans were submitted in response to a violation. The work had been done without permits. It has now been one month since you received this correction list. The Fire Department has also mailed you a correction list and has had no response. In the meantime employees continue to work in this unapproved environment. Please consider the liability you are incurring, and do whatever is x necessary to submit a good set of plans with all corrections. We <^~w~TTl assume, if a resubmission is not made by August 15, that you do not wish to respond, and we will take appropriate action. CARTER DARNELL c: Jim Harris Wayne Morgan Mike Harrington 2O~75 Las Palmas Drive-Carlsbad, California 92OO9-4859-(619) 438-1161 Citv of Carlsbad Community Development June 15, 1989 Ray Daily Animal Envi ronments 2270 Camino Vida Roble Carlsbad, Ca 92009 Plan Check 89-609 On April 24, 1989, you submitted plans for plan check showing storage racks of welded steel, a deck and stairways. On April 25, your plans were returned from the Building Department with the comment: "Inadequate plans", and requesting additional information. On May 4, 1989 the Fire Department sent you a correction list that required much additional information from you. The purpose environment of these comments is to help for you and your employees. you create a safe and legaj /&**' Our Senior Building Inspector Wayne Morgan called 001 you tcMFy to ask why a new high pressure gas line was required, an/he found it installed and all the construction for which you require a/permit completed. When he asked how you were coming with the plans, you said you "were working on it". 60 days is an adequate period to correct the plans and resubmit them, That leaves you ten days to complete the work. If plans are not n/our hands by June 29, we will refer this unapproved construction to o<fr Enforcement Officer with a request that he take immediate action. CARTER DARNELL, PLANCHECKER c: Jim Harris Wayne Morgan Mike Harrington 2O75 Las Palmas Drive-Carlsbad, California 92OG9-4859-(61 9) 438-1161