The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2285 RUTHERFORD RD; ; CB911377; PermitB U I L D I N G P E R M I T 11/07/9,1 13: 3·3 Page 1 of 1 Job Address: 2285 RUTHERFORD RD Permit Type: INDUSTRIAL TENANT IMPROVEMENT Parcel No: Valuation: 108 1 994 Construction Type:· III1 Occupancy Group: B2 Class Code: Description: ADD 7488 SF TO EXIST MEZZ Str: : ADD 1600 SF CANOPY OVER TRUCK DOCK (619) OWNER CITY OF CARLSBAD Permit No: CB911377 Project No: A9101745 Development No: Fl: Ste: 5164 11/07/91-0001 01 02 C-PRMT 20896-00 CJ<-{)fJ 7q r Status: Applied: Apr/Issue: Validated By: 496-3700 ISSUED 10/07/91 11/07/91 CD 818 986 4844 N N N 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 ..... ~. B U I L D I N G P E R M I T Permit No: CB911653 Project No: A9101745 Development No: 12/06/91 14:28 Page 1 of 1 Job Address: 2285 RUTHERFORD RD Str: Permit Type: MECHANICAL Parcel No: Valuation: 0 Construction Type: NEW Occupancy Group: Class Code: Description: MECH PERMIT, CALLAWAY GOLF FOR CB 911377 OWNER Fl: Ste: 5525 12/06/91 0001 01 02 C-PRMT 876-00 CP-/Sg-9<?" Status: ISSUED Applied: 12/06/91 Apr/Issue: 12/06/91 Validated By: CD 43'.J.0314 FINAL APPROVAL !MSP. ____ DATE __ ·CL~ARANCE ____ _ CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 920()9 (619) 438-1161 r.'. \ _,, '""' • t :---~ bl-' ,;; S E W E R P E R M I T ·,~t~··: 11/07 /~1-fh irt: '· Permit No: SE910099 Page 1: of 1 yOb Address: 2285 RUTHERFORD RD Permit Typei SEWER -OFFICE/WAREHOUSE Parcel No: 5164 :il/07/91 0001 01 02 Description:'CALLOWAY GOLF c;re~o 71~r-6tr , StaGus: ISSUED Applied: 10/17/91 Apr/Issue; 11/07/91 : ADD(748B SF _OFFICE TO MEZ. Permitee: SNYDER LANGSTON 5675 RUFFIN RD SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) 496-3700 Expired; Prepared By: MCL *** Fees Required *** .--<ic1r.·;----------Fet!11-,Collected & Credits *~'<* ,/ ,_ \ .,.,,.,,, ----------------------------;::-,,,."" -7,---:~-~~¥-\--,~~~~::::------------------------_._- Fees: 10,354 .. 64 :c , I:',\,,.~~·:·-"---· Adjustments! . /ou/;:::::~\\' \ ---·1-·To~~!i;-_·f;~i~-s,: -.oo Total. Fees: 10,~'54.64\~./.· --Tota~'---f'.e-h~iu\ .oo / ,, , / · · Bjil:~~ ~~i' 10 354;64 Fee description / cY\., / t[ni ts""'t': t~@)un\t E;t fee Data I " .... , ... : ,, }' I , -',,," ' ~ \ '\.,, I--\ ------------------~-·-~,---~--------·~~~-------~--~----~~----~--~~~--~---Enter Office Square.1 F6o-targEl ·--·--~-> ---· . · -7:J88_<' \ _;-___ \ 4, 16 To'tal EDUs / . . i ''-<., ,::,~:,;~_:_ .: ~.::.;-~,-. ~ Sewer F~~ ! 1·; ·-1 '·-----~)/~-· /: -q·,· \ l~~~~-'~~------ Enter sewer EDUs atttd '-Senefiit AreRl>~ -~·::-' ;1.16 /:. .1 I 3·606.64 F * SEWER TOTAL , ---· ': \--.. /1Jff1f .(-~;,;·,:; 0.;·-;,;_~: t __ ,. 1 10354.64 / ' I \ , ' ~ ~ '11' ' ,. : \ ,. , I \ \ C: ... ...,., , !t ! ' :· f ..,,. ~, ' ' \ \'~ "~-\~(.¥ r; \ ~·/ / ; \ \ ..... , / ~-tt-:, ,__. , I '\ rc~~'~{.J INCO~~tTED /, / ~ \\. 1:-)5;?. '-.,_;;~~: ::.,.. .. ti .. F ··:1 ;:,,--~- ' > • ':'X'tf '· ,;-((J; CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 9200') (619) 438-1161 POOR QUALITY ORIGINAL S ,_ , PERMIT APP'i .. ICA1ION' . ---._ - Building. Department ~ -~-ftte fr,;dlkrh. L . PERMIT TvP'~, NEW . 'QTENANnMPR0VE 'ENT A-·OCOMMERC!AL ' .; •. ·-. , ·, . ·. ONEW -.,.~ ~-TENAt/T !MPRDV .MENT 02 ·s -~1Np0$,TRIAL . . . •kicoflDO IJS{NGLE FAMILY DWELLING OADDITION/ALTERATI0N c' -'tJ.RESIDENTIAL .. OAPARTMEt!~<'elf':,;' , . , . ·o·· ~.~-ITI·ou.' ';t:J'· RElOCAT'ON QMOBI E HOME QELECTR!CAL OPLUMBING 753-00 ·; - 0 DUPLEX DEM0L ''•' ' . --. . . . 0:-OOL OSPA QRETA!NING LL OSOLAR Oo R OMECHAN!CAL ! ·· , . ·-.. -·. C 2 : .. · PROJ.ECT' lNFO~MAT.ION . _ . ?LAN LEGAL'DESCRIPUOlf.'.' . Lot No, . sylxhvis,on ame -. '' \'' :-. - .CHECK .BELC1,I lf SUBMlTTED: · 2· Energy: Cales P~OPOSED USE She] j -~ldg 5. _ l?ROP'ERTY ·9WNER } . OWNER ADDRESS ·"liA~ELarwtn Rosedale Prope.tt1es ·C_ ITY Enc i no .~ ... _:..,_ __ s~T!_AT~E_I.C.J::.AL~Z;;jl p~COD~E:.c-_::l...L!:lt..u.L----•'---~..!.:::.'.:.::::.:::::::;,;:--""4-':;)),L,':>-j-~cO,C;).:.=,t:c.!#*-~-,----,----'--'----_ _:::;:.:.:.-=.:.:..:::..:.,;"':==------,-..a....a..--~:7-.,.,_ 6. CONTRAClOR ! · NAME Snyder Langston ·/_ crTY San Di-ego .. STATE CA STA!E LTC. #'.,.....---- ) Sl_GNATURE I OES!-~NER N~~mith-Consulting cirr • ADDREss 5675 Ruff ZIP CODE 92123 .Rd •. #.300, DAY •TELEPHONE (619) 496-~.700 .CHY· BUSINESS LIC.,;# \ TITLE ADDRESS 9868 c crantori -Rct. #1.50 Di\Y TELEPHPNE STATE LIC.c;tt. JclliO 1-. , --. I • • •. , 7 • ' WORKER~-. COMP_ENSAf.IO~ . er;by affirm that 1 have a certiti~ate. of consent to sel f-insa,re· issued by the Di rector· of. lndustrial;Relations, \lockers : ~~nsation Dekclaration. 1 _ t' n Insurance by an a<initted insurer,. or an exact copy or dupl icilte thereof certified by the Q.irector. of the or a certificate of \lor ers' Compens, 10 -38(;ilo Lab C) · insur.er thereof f-iled with 'the ·sui ld ng Inspection Department (Section f ' · · . ._, .. .. · POLICY NO. ' EXP!RAJ.ION _DATE .• _,¾ _ _ INSURANCE-.COMPANY. . . · . f h k for which this permi't is. issued 1 ·shall not employ anY. person in any manner --certificate of·Exemption: I certify-,that 1n the p~rformance O t_e wo~ f · • : ~-, · · . ~o as t'o become subject to the Worke ·s' Compensqt1on Laws of Cal·1forn1a1 8 • -OWNER,-BUILOER D.ECLt'\e~y d1'[,!1_ ______ -.-,,::-:::c-:.::=--. ontract~r•s L ic~nse .Law· for the fol-lowing· .:easono · · -•-, <owner-Builder Decl~ration: ;/ · firm that I am exempt from the D I as owner'ot·the prop~r-y(or' m,y_entl~~~ 'S with wages as their sole c.;mpensation; wi-ll do the wor.k and the structuf~-;~ not in:ended or offered for sale (Sec 7044 .a~swes~nd Proiession . 0 ·: The.Contractor's L icensr Law does not apply ~o an owner of property. who bu1 lds or improves thereon,, and who does· such ~ork hif!Js~l f o: t~roug\1_ hi~ of employees, provided· -tha~ such _improvements are not inte~ed or off ere~ for sal_e,. If,_ however, the building cir impr?,vement is--s~la w1 th in one yea 'Oflll'let ion, the owner-bui~der w1 l l have the bur.den of proving that he d1 d not bu, ld or improve for the purpose of sale.). 1 , • -...':--.. • • ' am excfusively j '• '-. . . · . d DI as owner of the property, t apply t t t· g with licens contcactors to consteuct-the proiect (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Coe: The contractor's License Law does n~ License La.on rac ,n f property ho bui.lds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) . t' the contractor s . . an owner o . l-icensed pursu~nt · o '".I>. 0 1 am exempt under sect!0n' ·, \ Business and Pr fess ions Code for thi's·reason: . rofesslo~ns Code: Any city or"-1 ~ •• · ·csec·;,031_-5 8~51.f)ess and-:0 re uires the app_lican_t for '\county whicf requ_ites a ~ermit to construct, alte:·• i'."f'rove, ·demolish, or repair a~y-structure, prior to its issuance! al q 9 col111\encing 1nth Sectl~ch perm"t to file a signed statement that_he 1s licensed pursuant to the prov1s1ons of the contract~r's License law (Chapter ;ion. Any violation of S\on 700,~of Division 3 of t_he Business and Pr-of.essions Code) or that he is ,exempt therefrom, and the basi~ for the alleged ex[e;fOOJ). tiin 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the appficant to a civil penalty of not th, five hundred dollars more . an . , SIGNATURE L BUILDING PERMITS ONL D,I\TE . COMPLETE THIS SECTION FOR NON·RESIDENT!A . . ld' occupant requ1 red to. . . . . . . . Is· the applicant or future btil ,ng 5534 of t . 1t a busrness plan, acutely hazardous materials:reg1strat1on form or' risk management and prevention program under sections 25505, 25 . J • sley-Tanner Hazardous Substance· Account Ac,t? ---· . : . ,_/. -DYES o·No • . ·. . Is the applicant or futu/" building occupant required ·to obtain a permit from the air pollution, coritrol d1strict or air-~ual.i'ty management dist~ict? . , ·r · [)-YE~ . D No . : . -. Is the fac_ili.ty to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? . • OY~S ONO . ' If ANY OF THE;/(NSWERS AR& YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCaJPANCY·MAY NOT BE ISSUED AFTER JULY 1·; 1989 UNLESS THE ARPLICANT HAS MET.OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFF.ICE OF EME(!GENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. t .. CONSTRUCTION ~ENDING AGENCY hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the perform,mce of the work for which thi_s permit is issyed (Sec 3097'.(i) Ci.v,il ·code). LENDER IS NAME tENDER' S ADDRE_SS 10. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE I certif.y that l have read the application and state that the above information 1s correct. I agree to comply wit.h alr City ordinances ;and St.ate laws relating · :to building construction. l hereby authorize representatives of the City of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspeqion p~rposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE INDEMNIFY AND KEEP !HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JLOGMENTS, COSTS •AND EXPENSES IIHICH MAY IN ANY IIAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID Cl-TY iN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. . by the Building Official under the provisions of this Code shall.expire i>y"CfmTtati,;n and become null and void if the.build.ing it is not coomenced within 180 days. from the date of such permit or j.f the building· or work .authori zeq by· such permit ii;. suspended the wor~ is coomenced for a period of 180 days (Section 303(d) Uniform 'B4Hding C:C,de). ,· · · D OWNER O CONTRACTOR OBY PHONE ~ ~ ~ APPROVE°il · ilY i DATE: .. --~---- WHITE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance . ..._ .... DEP';r: BUILDING FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION ENGINEERING '.FIRE· PLANNING U/M WATER PLAN CHECK#: CB911377 PERMIT#: CB911377 PROJECT NAME: ADD 7488 SF TO EXIST MEZZ ADD 1600 Sf CANOPY OVER TRUCK DOCK ADDRESS: L.2-285 _-RUTHERFORD RD CONTACT PE~SON/PHONE#: MH/431-0314 SEWER DIST: WATER DIST:. INSPECTED DATE BY: INSPECTED: .. APPROVED INSPECTED DATE BY: INSPECTED: APPROVED INSPECTED DATE BY: INSPECTED: APPROVED COMMENTS: DATE: 01/21/92 PERMIT TYPE: ITI . DISAPPROVED DISAPPROVED DISAPPROVED PERMIT# CB9ll377 DESCRIPTION: ADD ADD TYPE: ITI CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST FOR 01/21/92 7488 SF TO EXIST MEZZ 1600 SF CANOPY OVER TRUCK DOCK INSPECTOR AREA MP PLANCK# CB911377 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE NEW STR: FL: STE: JOB ADDRESS:· 2285 RUTHERFORD RD APPLICANT: SNYDER LANGSTON CONTRACTOR: OWNER: LARWIN ROSEDALE (619) 496-3700 PHONE~ PHONE:. PHONE-:· -818 9.3:P_ 8\4_ / REMARKS: MH/431-0314 SPECIAL INSTRUCT: INSPECTOR~~--~-~--------- TOTAL TIME: --RELATED PERMITS--PERMIT# SE890127 SE910099 CB911653 CB911390 SE910100 TYPE swow swow MECH ITI swow STATUS ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED CD LVL DESCRIPTION ACT COMMENTS 19 ST Final Structural 29 PL Final Plumbing 39 EL Final Electrical 49) ME Final Mechanical r------... -- ~--__________________________________ 7j! S,,,~ ee,Jl..e,~,. t. JJadC }';){ t}41 DATE 011592 010692 010692 010692 010392 010392 010392 010392 010292 010292 01029.2 010292 010292 123191 123191 123191 123191 122691 121691 121391 121291 120991 ***** INSPECTION HISTORY***** DESCRIPTION Interior Lath/Drywall- Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Rough/Topout Interior Lath/Drywall Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Interior Lath/Drywall Rough/Topout Rough Electric Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Rough/Topout Rough Electric Rqugh/Ducts/Dampers Interior Lath/Drywall Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Interior Lath/Drywall Rough/fopout .Rough Electric Shear Panels/HD's Frame/Steel/Bel.ting/Welding Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Frame/Steel/Bqlting/Welding Interior· Lath/Drywall ACT INSP AP MP AP MP AP MP. PA MP NR MP NR MP NR MP NR MP AP MP PA MP PA MP NR MP.. PA MP NR MP NR MP NR MP NR MP PA MP PA MP PA MP PA MP PA MI> COMMENTS OFFICES/lST FLR/MEZZ/BTHRMS OK TO ROCK WALL@ D-1 1ST FLOOR 1ST FLOOR MEZZ & 1ST FLOOR 1ST FLOOR MEZZ SHEAR WALL@ LINE D.1 WALL@ LINE D.1 OK TO COVER MECH. SHAFTS 2ND LAYER@ MEZZ I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & 'TESTING, INC. 6280 RIVERDALE STREET, P.O. BOX 600627 SAN DIEGO, Ca. 92160, Phone (619) 280-4321 747ENTERPRISE STREET, ESCONDIDO. Ca. 92029, Phone (619) 746-4544 I FIELD INSPECTOR REPORT PROJECT TITLE Callaway Golf SCS&T FILE No. 9112295 I.R. No. 2 PLAN FILE No. PROJECT LOCATION 2285 Rutherford Road, Carlsbad PERMIT No. 91-1377 ARCHITECT Smith Consulting Architects GENERAL CONTRACTOR Snyder Langston ENGINEER SKI Structural Engineer SUB CONTRACTOR Sierra Steel 12/05/91 Scott A. DeMars 356 12/06/91 M. Saunders 452 12/07/91 M. Sat1nders 452 DIS'FIUBUTION: Time Arrived: 1100 Time Departed: 1530 Structural Stee! Assembly Tube Steel ASTM AS00, Plate ASTM A36 Provided continuous field welding inspection on steel tube canopy located at south end of building B. Welding consisted of connections located on west end of canopy. Work inspected is acceptable per approved drawing sheet S3. Welding done by certified operators using NR211, E70XX series welding electrodes, flux core arc welding process. Time Arrived: 0630 Time Departed: 1500 Structural Steel Assembly Certified welders were observed for proper welding procedures and techniques. Visually inspected. the fillet welding of tube steel connections at the truck dock canopy. Half of the canopy welds are cqmpleted. Completed welds were inspected for size, length, location and appears to be acceptable. Time Arrived: 0630 Time Departed: 1300 Structural Steel Assembly Inspected the fillet welding of tube steel connections at the truck dock canopy. Completed welds were inspected for size, length , location and appears to be in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. Certified welders same as 12106/91. (2) Callaway Golf;Attn: Carol Kerley (2) Bilbro-Giffin SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & TESTING, INC. ( 1) Snyder/Langston ( 1 l City of Carlsbad I SAVED FILE#, REPORT I 2295R2 g;;:;::~ ~es E. Oliverson JE00008 ., SO~RN CALIFORNIA S,OIL & TESTING, INC. 6280 Riverdale Street, San Diego, CA 92120 P.O. Box 600627, San Diego, CA92160 619-280-4~21, FAX 619-280-4717 November 26, 1991 Callaway Golf 2345 Camino Vida Roble Carlsbad, California 92009 Attention: Carol Kerley SCS&T 9112295 Report Number 1 R Subject: Foundation Design Review, Mezzanine No. 1 Improvements, 2285 Rutherford Road, Carlsbad Research Center, Carlsbad, California Reference: Gentlemen: 1) Preliminary Geotechnical Study, Carlsbad Research Center, Lots 16, 18, and 19, Trac~ 81-10, Carlsbad, California, Prepared by Geosoils, WO989-SD, March 14, 1989 2) Final Soils Report, Capital Improvements, 5960 Pascal Court and 2285 Rutherford Road, Carlsbad Research Center, Carlsbad, California, Prepared by Geosoils, WO989-SD, June 4, 1990 In accordance with the request of Mr. Mike Giffen of Bilbro and Giffen, this letter has been prepared to provide foundation recommendations for the proposed mezzanine improvements at the subject site. This revised letter is provided due to the error in the jobsite address in the previous Report No. 1 and to confirm our recommendations after reviewing the above referenced reports. It appears that up to two feet of compacted fill underlies the building, and the soils at the site may be expansive . It is recommended that all new footings be founded a minimum of 18 inches below finish subgrade due to the possible expansive nature of the subsurface soils. The present design width of 18 inches and an allowable bearing capacity of 1,000 psf appear to be adequate. If you should have any questions after reviewing this letter, please do not hesitate to contact this office. This opportunity to be of professional servjce is sincerely appreciated. Respectfully submitted, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL AND TESTING, INC. William R. Stevens, R.C.E. #4301 0 WRS:wrs xc: (2) Submitted (1) Bilbro and Giffen ( 1 ) Snyder Langston Builders ( 1 ) City of Carlsbad ( 1 ) SCS& T Escondido Office .. ,, ~~ SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & TESTING, INC. 6280 RIVERDALE STREET, P.O. BOX 600627 SAN DIBGO, Ca. 92160, Phone (619) 280-4321 747 ENTERPRISE STREET, ESCONDIDO. Ca. 92029, Phone (619) 746-4544 FIELD INSPECTOR REPORT PROJECT TITLE Callaway Golf SCS&T FILE No. 911,2295 I.R. No. 1 , page 1 of 2 PLAN FILE No. PROJECT LOCATION 2285 Rutherford Road, Carlsbad PERMIT No. 91-1377 ARCHITECT Smith Architect ENGINEER SKI Structural Engineer GENERAL CONTRACTOR Snyder Langston SUB CONTRACTOR R.J.C. Construction, Sierra Steel 11 /11 /91 Thomas Kriska 508 l 1 /11 /91 Thomas Kriska 508 DISTRIBUTION: Time Arrived: 0600 Time Departed: 1 200 Reinforced Concrete Reinforcing Steel; ASTM A615, Grade 60 Palolmar Transit Mix Design #56432056, 3000psi Provided inspection of reinforcing steel in footing, pad footings and grade beam per approved plan prior to placement of 60 cubic yards of concr.ete by truck chute. Consolidation acheived by mechanical vibrator. One set of three samples fabricated at 6 line D to D.5. Slump = 3-3/4" Air temperature = 66 degrees; Concrete temperature = 72 degrees. Plumber wrapped cleanouts in footing with foam prior to concrete placement. Approval is pending upon written a statement from the design authority stating that the reinforcing cut in existing grade beams at line D 2-5 at D 6.5 need not be repaired. Time Arrived: 0900 Time Departed: 1100 Reinforced Concrete Reinforcing Steel; ASTM A615, Grade 60 FCAW: Electrodes E70T-7 Certified Welder Doug Fine: AWS D1 .4. Provided continuous inspection during fit-up and welding of 8-#7 rebar that were removed to facilitate pad footing installation at D2.5 and D6.5. Assumed carbon content of 0.75 in reinforcing steel, used interpass per architects details dated 10/3/91. -.-,,, ,, )~ .. NOV 1991 REGE:': Pw;,:, Depan,, (3) Callaway Golf; Attn: Carol Kerley (1) Bilbro Giffin SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & TESTING, INC. (1) Snyder/Langston ( 1 ) City of Carlsbad SAVED FILE#, REPORT# 2295R1 a REVIEWED BY: ~ ~ c.E/_ 11/ 7a:es E. Oliverson JE00008 SOUTHERN CA~IFORNIA SOIL & TESTING, INC. 6280 RIVERDALE STREET, P.O. BOX 600627 SAN DIBGO, Ca. 92160, Phone (619) 280-4321 747 ENTERPRISE STREET, ESCONDIDO. Ca. 92029, Phone (619) 746-4544 FIELD INSPECTOR REPORT PROJECT TITLE Callaway Golf SCS&T FILE No. 9112295 I.R. No. 1 , Page 2 of 2 PLAN FILE No. PRO.JECT LOCATION 2285 Rutherford Road, Carlsbad PERMIT No. 91-1377 ARCHITECT Smith Architect ENGINEER SKI Structural Engineer GENERAL CONTRACTOR Snyder Langston SUB CONTRACTOR R.J.C. Construction, Sierra Steel 11 /14/91 Thomas Kriska. 508 11 /15/91 Thomas Kriska 508 11 /15/91 Thomas Kriska 508 DISTRIBUTION: Time Arrived: 0830 Time Departed: 1 530 Sturctural Steel Assembly Cettified Welder; Stephen Senatore, Lab #89-1123 and William J. Force, Lab#0472. Provided continuous inspection during fit-up and welding of 3-4"x4x3/16". Tub steel columns to base plates, column cap plates to existing beams and web stiffness on existing beams above new clumns at D-2.5, D-3.5, D-6.5, also witnessed welding of beam shear plate at D-6 line. Contractor notified that moment frame at D-6 line must have A305 bolts, also glue lam bean bucket need additional 3/16" fillet weld inside of saddles full length. Work is riot complete at this time. Unless noted otherwise work inspected to date is per A WSD. 1 and approved plans. Time Arrived: 0700 Time Departed: 1500 Certified Welders; Stephen Senatore, Lab#89-1123 and William I. Force, Lab#0472 Provided inspection during fit-up and welding of 2-4"x4"x3/16" tube steel columns to base plates, column cap plates to existing beams and web stiffness to existing beams above new columns at lines D-4.5, D-5.5. Also witnessed full penetation welds at moment connections on line D-6. Discrepencies noted on inspection report dated 11-14 have been corrected. Witnessed welding of drag straps and glue lam seats at lir-ies D-3 and D-4 to existing columns. Tested A325 bolts for proper torque wit_h a calibrated torque wrench, ultra sound tenchnician approved full penetration welds at moment frame connections, see his report for test results. Work inspected to date is in accordance with the AWS D.1 and approved plans and specifications. Ultrasonic examination of full penetration welds, by ASNT qualified operator as shown on attached sheet. (3) Callaway Golf;Attn: Carol Kerley ( 1 ) Bilbro-Giffin SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & TESTING, INC. (1) Snyder/Langston ( 1 ) City of Carlsbad SAVED FILE#, REPORT# 2295R 1 A REVIEWED BY: Q_ -A--" C /J ;;_ //James E. Oliverson ' JE00008 ., 1_~,· ~ ' 878 ENTE"PRISE ..,,.EET. ESCONO<DO. CAUFORN"'-8202~ SCUTHl!RN CALIFt s2iib RIVERDALE ST~EET. ~ __ DIEGO. CAL I r-:=a ~ ,q ; '' . ' ... ) REPORT OF ULTRASONIC WELD TESTING JOB1 ~§atgtj/2~ ?fof_ REPORT DATEr 11-1s-v JOB NO,. 9.t!~ ~-- INSPECTOR,.....&;'6: ~~ ~6 PLACE I .. -~ -REPAIR FULL PENETRATION \'Lt .. ~=~ GRID LINE STATION ACC REJ ACC I REJ FLOOR BEAM FLANGES TO CC:J"jl_:-: '.:-: _ _.___. k---D~ i;-·A/ T ,)( ~.!Jff__ J3~??E.li.f!P5 ~ ~ B .X t-/J . <; T /C ~~ A P/4~ lo ~1_ ,,: B X ea/?? ~ .-1, -,~. T v : B ; T : ' B -- T : B ' T t B -\_ ' : I T ' B -T ' B \ ·T B , - T· B ; -T ' B : ; T ' ~ B , -' \ ' T t .B ' T I i B l ! -• + -- t T B ' . T i B ' \ T \ B -;' T ' -B ·. [ T l ,. B j .. ~~ ;;~;:"',--;ti~=;'~ .... : .. :-_, .. .... .,._ .. _.' -· .- SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & TESTING, INC. 6280 RIVERDALE STREET, P.O. BOX 600627, SA.NDIBGO, CA. 92160 (619) 280-4321 747ENTERPRISE STREET, ESCONDIDO, CA. 9202S, (619) 746-4544 COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST REPORT FILE NUMBER 9112295 PROJECT TITLE Ca 11 away Go 1 f PROJECT LOCATION 2285 Rutherford Rd., Carlsbad ARCHITECT Smith Architects ENGINEER CONTRACTOR Snyder Langston Builder? DATE: Nov. 18, 1991 PERMIT No. 91-1377 PLAN FILE No. IK:] CONCRETE (ASTM C39) 0 MORT AR (UBC 24-22) 0 GROUT (ASTM C1019) 0 PRISMS (ASTM E44 7) D LOCATION IN STRUCTURE Grade beam 6 1 i ne, from D to D. 5 Concrete Temperature: 72° Air Temperature: 66° MATERIALSUPPLIER Palomar Transit ADMIXTURE(S) MIX DESIGNATION 56432056/6 sack TIME IN MIXER, MINUTES 32 SLUMP, INCHES 3-1/ 4 SAMPLES FABRICATED BY TK SAMPLES TESTED BY -DRB LABORATORY No. MARK DATE MADE DATE RECEIVED DATE TESTED DIAMETER, INCHES AREA,SQUAREINCHES MAXIMUM LOAD, LBS COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH, PSI AG!: TESTED, DAYS REQUIRED 28 DAY STRENGTH, PSI UNIT WT.ICU. FT. (PLASTIC) 6396 11-11-91 11-12-91 11-18-91 6.00 28.27 78,750 2,790 7 3,000 DISTRIBUTION ( 3) Ca 11 away Golf (1) Bilbro & Gifftn (1) Snyder-Langston (1) City of Carlsbad (1) Palomar Transit 6397 TRUCK No. 71 TICKET No. 91397 6398 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & TESTING, INC. n...,001 ~OUTHERNCALIFORNIA S{9IL & TESTING, INC. 6280 Riverdale Street, San Diego, CA 92120 P.O. Box 600627, San Diego, CA 92160 619-280-4321, FAX 619-280-4717 November 26, 1991 SCS&T 9112295 Report Number 2R Callaway Golf 2345 Camino Vida Roble Carlsbad, California 92009 Attention: Subject: Reference: Gentlemen: Carol Kerley Foundation Excavation Observations, Mezzanine No. 1 Improvements, 2285 Rutherford Road, Carlsbad Research Center, Carlsbad, California 1) Mezzanine No. 1 Improvements, 2285 Rutherford Road, Carlsbad Research Center, Prepared by Southern California Soil and Testing, Inc., Job No. 9112295, Report No. 1 R, November 26, 1991 2) Preliminary Geotechnical Study, Carlsbad Research Center, Lots 16, 18, and 19, Tract 81-10, Carlsbad, California, Prepared by Geosoils, WO989-SD, March 14, 1989 3) Final Soils Report, Capital Improvements, 5960 Pascal Court and 2285 Rutherford Road, Carlsbad Research Center, Carlsbad, California, Prepared by Geosoils, WO989-SD, June 4, 1990 In accordance with the request of Mr. Michael Giffin of Bilbro and Giffin, this letter has been prepared to verify that we have observed the continuous footing excavation along column line D.5 and the isolated footing .excavation at D.5 and 6 for the subject improvements. This revised letter is provided due to the error in the jobsite address in the previous Report No. 1 and after reviewing the geotechnical investigation. Our observations indicated that: 1) All footings well be founded in a firm bearing stratum. 2) The footing excavations comply with the recommendations made by our firm. 3) The footing is supported by firm clayey and silty soil between column lines 1 to 3 ;· ,,, ,\ SCS&T 9112295 November 26, 1991 Page 2 of 2 and 6 to 8, and by a decomposed granite backfill associated with the existing sewer line between column lines 3 to 6. The opinions presented in this letter are based on observations made at the subject site. Our services were performed in accordance with the currently accepted standards-of-practice and in such a manner as to provide a reasonable measure of compliance with the job requirements. No warranty, either express or implied, is given or intended ·with respect to the services which we have performed. Additionally, neither th~ performance of_ these services nor the submittal of this letter should be construed as relieving the contractor of his primary responsibility to comply with the project requirements. If you should have any questions after reviewing this letl:er, please do not hesitate to contact this office. This opportunity ~o be of professional service is sincerely appreciated. Respectfully submitted, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL AND TESTING, INC. V,Je I ~ William R. Stevens, R.C.E. #43010 WRS:wrs xc: (2) Submitted (2) Bilbro and Giffin (1) Snyder Langston Builders (1) City of Carlsbad ( 1) SCS& T Escondido Office PERMIT# CB911377 DESCRIPTION: ADD ADD TYPE: IT! CI'rY OF C~LSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST FOR 01/06/92 7488 SF TO EXIST MEZZ 1600 SF CANOPY OVER TRUCK DOCK JOB ADDRESS: 2285 RUTHERFORD RD APPLICANT: SNYDER LANGSTON PHONE: CONTRACTOR: PHONE: INSPECTOR AREA MP PLANCK# CB911377 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE NEW STR: FL: STE: (619) 496-3700 OWNER: LARWIN ROSEDALE PHONE: 818 986 4844 REMARKS: RS/ROBBIE/431-0314 SPECIAL INSTRUCT: INSPECTOR TOTAL TIME: --RELATED PERMITS--PERMIT# SE890127 SE910099 CB911653 CB911390 SE910100 TYPE swow swow MECH ITI swow STATUS ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ----------- CD LVL DESCRIPTION ACT COMMENTS 14 24 ST Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 7'c6.Ftt PL Rough/T~o ut -We;=· -z;::_· = _____ .._____ ----------------------------------------· --------------------- DATE 010292 010292 010292 010292 010292 123191 123191 123-191 123191 122691 121691 . 121,391 121291 120991 120491 120391 1202.91 112791· 112291 112191 110891 ***** INSPECTION HISTORY***** DESCRIPTION Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Rough/Topout Rough Electric Rough/Ducts/Dampers Interior Lath/Drywall .. Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Interior Lath/Drywall Rough/Topout Rough Electric Shear Panels/HD's -Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Fra~e/Steel/Bolting/Welding Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding :I;nterior Lath/Drywall Interior Lath/Drywall Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers ACT lNSP AP MP PA MP PA MP NR MP PA MP NR MP NR MP NR MP NR MP PA MP· PA MP PA ?-iP PA MP PA M~- PA MP PA MP PA MP . ~R MPC· PA MP NR MP PA MP COMMENTS 1ST FLOOR 1ST FLOOR MEZZ & 1ST FLOOR 1ST FLOOR MEZZ SHEAR WALL@ LINE D.1 WALL@ LINE D.1 OK TO COVER MECH. SHAFTS 2ND LAYER@ MEZZ 1ST LAYER@ MEZZ OK TO ROCK MEZZ OK TO POUR LIGHTWEIGHT DIAPHRAM NLNG NOT RDY 3:10PM PLUMBING TRENCH MARKED ON JOB CARD PERMIT# CB911377 DESCRIPTION: ADD ADD TYPE: ITI CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST FOR 01/03/92 7488 SF TO EXIST MEZZ 1600 SF CANOPY OVER TRUCK DOCK INSPECTOR AREA MP PLANCK# CB911377 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE NEW STR: FL: STE: JOB ADDRESS: 2285 RUTHERFORD RD · APPLI.CANT: SNYDER LANGSTON PHONE: (619) 496-3700 CONTRACTOR: OWNER: LARWIN ROSEDALE ::g::: 818 986 4JV INSPECTOR ~[\;1 I . · RE~S: RS/ROBBIE/431-0314 SPECIAL INSTRUCT: TOTAL TIME: ~-RELATED PERMITS-- CD LVL DESCRIPTION PERMIT# SE890127 SE910099 CB911653 CB911390 SE910100 TYPE swow swow MECH ITI swow 14 ST Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 17 ST Interior Lath/Drywall 24 PL Rough/T.opout 34 EL Rough Electric ----------------------------------------------·---------------------- ACT STATUS ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ***** INSPECTION HISTORY***** DATE 12~191 123191 123191 123191 122691 121691 121391 1212.91 120991 120491 12,0391 12·0291 112791 112291 112191 110891 DESCRIPTION Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Interior Lath/Drywall Rough/Topout Rough Electric Shear Panels/HD's Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Interior Lath/Drywall Interior Lath/Drywall Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Frame/Steel/Bel ting/Welding . Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers ACT INSP NR MP NR MP NR MP NR MP PA MP PA MP PA MP PA MP PA MP PA MP PA MP PA MP NR MPC PA MP NR MP PA MP COMMENTS SHEAR WALL@ LINE D.1 WALL@ LINE D.1 OK TO COVER MECH. SHAFTS 2ND LAYER@ MEZZ 1ST LAYER@ MEZZ OK TO ROCK MEZZ OK TO POUR LIGHTWEIGHT DIAPHRAM NLNG NOT ROY 3:10PM PLUMBING TRENCH MARKED ON JOB CARD s~~l.«A S«t -"' ~,,-,. '7•. 280-4321 FIELD REPORT FILE NO. 11 l 1_2°!~ DATE(S) tl...-(n-41 JOB NAME ( M 1 -~ 'k¥ Go.'-~ · . PRoJE"ct ENGl~EER M ;f th:,-G..(A-,e. , \MR-Srzaa i, CONTRACTOR -:;;,c--\,11:pE-·,e, b-A:Nq<:::rn r-..) ,REPORT NO. _____ _ FIELD TECHNICIAN ~Ol )r-;q !dv y ~ FOREMAN-------------- EQUIPMENT WORKING-------------,------------------------- TYPE OF COMPACTOR-------------,-------~-----........._ __________ _ DATE REMARKS r te,..,.- !l/Pf?' I l 1::\, 0 <; r,C ,-: \c;. -4.,-,., c · 1 DA.TE HOURS CHARGED I l I T!05 ,, , SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & TESTING, INC. 6280 RIVERDALE STREET, P.O. BOX 600627, SAN DIBGO, CA. 92160 (619) 280-4321 747 ENTERPRISE STREET, ESCONDIDO, CA. 92025, (619) 746-4544 i COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST REPORT . FILE NUMBER : PROJECT TITLE / 9112295 Ca 11 away Gal f . PROJECT LOCATION 2285 Rutherford Rd., Carlsbad l ARCHITECT Smith Architects ; ENGINEER ' jCONTRACTOR Snyder Langston Builders DATE: Nov. 18, 1991 PERMIT No. 91-1377 PLAN FILE No. ~ D D D D CONCRETE (ASTM C39) MORT AR (UBC 24-22) GROUT (ASTM C1019) PRISMS (ASTM E447) \ocATION IN STRUCTURE Grade beam 6 1 ine, from D to 0.5 Concrete Temperature: 72° Air Temperature: 66° I : MATERIAL SUPPLIER ! ! ADMIXTURE(S} MIX DESIGNATION . TIME IN MIXER, MINUTES 1 SLUMP, INCHES . i SAMPLES FABRICATED BY I j SAMPLES TESTED BY LABORATORY No. MARK Palomar Transit 56432056/6 sack 32 3-1/4 TK ORB · 6396 11-11-91 11-12-91 6397 DATE MADE DATE RECEIVED ! DATE TESTED I ' DIAMETER, l~CHES 11-18-91 12-09-91 6.00 AREA,SQUAREINCHES MAXIMUM LOAD, LBS 28.27 78,750 119,000 1 COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH, PSI I AGE TESTED. DAYS 2,790 ~,210 7 28 REQUIRED 28 DAY STRENGTH, PSI UNIT WT.ICU. FT. (PLASTIC) 3,000 DISTRIBUTION ( 3) Ca 11 away Golf (1) Bilbro & Giffin (1) Snyder-Langston (1) City of Carlsbad (1) Palomar Transit TRUCK No. 71 6398 12-,.09-91 ·116,750 4,130 28 TICKET No. 91397 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & TESTING, INC. ·-· ~{;~~)~ffi.~IIB_\1,~~:ill~'\l~~;;il'.2~I!;iW;}11i§?.~'l~~i~~~£~i'/Eil9~2.ailt.'~9~~~-'::~:;~. ~-;::::::L'.;.'.;.:;~~il:lli·i.:'<J.!f.:.'.:hL:i;;_._1-:;S::J--. ~:.;_ .. :...,:, _ _;_,0::..:,:,::1~~--'':.':.5'. ... ,,~·~'_,:_. :: •. _.: . ..:. ~) '·i . ,. DATE: OLT ESGIL CORPORATION- 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) 560-1468 0APPk~CANT JURISDICTION: c:r;i ,itfREDrcTr?E) 0 PLAN CHECKER QFILE COPY OUPS PLAN CHECK NO: l. it, C\ \ -\ ~ 7] _ SET: { 1) r;DESIGNER PROJECT ADDRESS: dS::X C :Js,, ~.u ~ .. ,, 4-'\2.rl,.. PROJECT NAME: Cti.,...\~'or,-d., 1<.e. "b e.e"'-"' L , .. ~ ;......, D II rhe plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficien- cies identified \::,o <>;::> are resolved and checked by building department staff •. 0 . The plans .trartsmitted _herewith ha;e significant defici·e~cies ·. identified on the enclbsed check list and should be corrected D and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corp. until corrected. plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the · jurisdiction to return to. the applica·nt contact person. D II The applicant's copy of the check· list has been sent to: Esgil staff did not advise the appli6ant contact person that plan check has been completed. O Esgil staff did advise applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted=----------w---- Date c.ontacte : -------------11 R MARKS =-=~,t..,;;,...;.-=-=--=::.....i.x...c;,.~~=-~:..:..!.ll~~~u:......:=-2~~=-;;;;~~~~'"'=== 0GA DAA ORN Date s·JO po\:\\ Prepared bys ::;J M, vlL Jurisdiction U--t\~W. VALUATION AND ?LAH CHECK FEE PLAN CHECK NO, ( b '?\\-§11 (I) BUILDING ADDRESS a~S'.\ ~u]NO· ~"~ ed. . . -. o Bldg. Dept. ~Esgil AP?LI-CANT/CONTACT -=t:,\o"\'\crcea ..... <;,n-z:, PHONE NO. :::\5'L -~\3~ EUILDING OCCUPANCY b-2. . DESIGNER PHONE ------ T'i?B OF ·coNSTRUCTIO°r,F . :pt·:-~\\a'S \ ;SP.,.~ .. CONTRACTOR ?HONE ____ _ :SU'ILDING PORTION BU ILD!NG AREA VALUE ~i-1 800 - ' Air Conditionin~ Commercial Residential Res. or Comm. - Total Value Ouildinti Permit f'ee S -----_____________ .... s _~..,.....<>~·-\ ____ _ I Plan Checlc tee S S l "!, Y? '-{ •lpj ---='----------------,---------:-", -------~- c OM Mt: NT S __ : ----------------------------- SHEET· (0 OF (D .... ··:·- act-OG.'i~ l\S, Y,Zt2, fQ ,. BUILDING PLANCHECK ENGINEERING CHECKLIST 2 N D C C H H E E Kl K 3 R D C H E K 000 I DATE: _____ }'"""'Q"'-.... ___.__I 1 __ -___ q __ \ ___ _ PLAN CHECK NO. C (?:, 'l l ... l °3 77 zza~ _,?'" I PROJECT ID: APflJ .212..-Ob I""'. I() C. j l LEGAL REQUIREMENTS Site Plan ~ ITEM COMPLETE ITEM INCOMPLETE NEEDS YOUR ACTION ITEM SELECTED 1. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: north arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed ~tructures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way width and dimension setbacks. GZIDD 2 • Show on site plan: Finish floor elevations, pad to ~nd and ODO rioo DOD ODD DOD D'DD 3. elevations, elevations of finish grade adjacent building, existing topographical lines, existing proposed slopes, driveway with percent ( % ) grade drainage patterns. Provide legal description and Assessors Parcel Number. Discretionary Approval Compliance 4. 5. 6. No Discretionary approvals were required. Project complies with all Engineering Conditions of Approval for Project No.~---------------- Project does not comply witp. the following Engineering Conditions of Approval for Project No. _________ _ Conditions complied with by: ________ Date:...,_ __ _ Field Review 7. Field review completed. No issues raised. 8. Field review completed. The following issues or discrepancies with the site plan were found: ODD A. site lacks adequate public 'improvements ODD B. DOD c. P:\DOCS\MISFORMS\FRM0010.DH Existing drainage improvements not shown or in conflict with site plan. '. · Site is served by overhead power lines. REV. 02/27/91 oo·'o D. Grading is required to access site, create pad. or provide for ultimate street improvement. DODE. site access visibility problems exist. Provide onsite turnaround or engineered solution to problem. DOD F. Other: __________________________ _ cioo DOD Dedication Requirements 9. 10. No dedication required. Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8\" x 11" plat map and submit with a title report and the required processing fee. All easement documents must be approved and signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building .Permit. The description of the dedication is as follows: ______________ _ Dedication completed, Date_-_______ _ By: __ _ rJJ Improvement Requirements \J D [] 1.1. No public improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or · defective improvements found adjacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction of the City inspector prior to occupancy. · Public improvements required. This proj.ect requires construction of public improvements pursuant to Section 18.40 of the City Code. Please have a registered Civil Engineer prepare appropriate improvement plans and submit for separate plancheck process through the Engineering Department. ImprQvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of permit. The required improvements are: __ _ Improvement plans signed, Date: ________ by: ___ _ P: \DOCS\MI SFORMS\FRM0010 .D.H REV. 02/27 /91 ,DDQ 13·. Improvements are required. Construction of the public improvements may be deferred in accordance with Section 18.40 of the City Code. Please submit a letter requesting def err al of the required improvements together with a . recent title report on the property and the appropriate processing fee so we .may prepare the necessary Future Improvement Agreement. The Future Improvement Agreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Future Improvement Agreement completed, Date: _____ _ By: ____ ---'-----......-,- 0 DD 13a. Inadequate information available on site plan to make a determination on grading requirements. Please provide more detailed proposed and existing elevations and contours. Include accurate estimates of the grading quantities (cut, fill, import, export). I ISlJDD 14. No grading required as determined by the provided on the site plan. information D D D 15. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer must be submitted for separate plan check and approval through the Engineering Department. NOTE: The Grading Permit must be issued and grading substantially complete and found acceptable to the City Inspector prior to issuance of. Building Permits. Grading Inspector sign off. Date: ______ by: ______ _ Miscellaneous Permits I ISZJDD DOD ODD [gjOD I QJDD 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Right-of-Way Permit not required. Right-of-Way Permit required. A separate Right-of-Way Permit issued by the Engineering Department is required for the following: ______________________ _ Sewer Permit is not reguired. Sewer Permit is required. A sewer Permit is required concurrent with Building Permit issuance. The fee required is noted below in the fees section. Industrial Waste Permit is not required. P:\DOCS\MISFORMS\FRM0010.DH REV. 02/27/91 ~ • 11 DD D 21 • A!)T I g [31 (2Y. KAI D ~ 0 Industrial Waste Permit is required. Applicant must complete Industrial Waste Permit App·lication Form and submit for City approval prior to issuance of a Building Permits. Permits must be issued prior to occupancy. Industrial Waster Permit accepted - Date: it -24~ !J /-By : ____ C.._,,,[.___J ____ ~~----/~ ·?~ZJ I. Fees Required ADD JI B0'-1,:6 OF-F!CE } 27. Park-in-Lieu Fee 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. Quadrant: ____ Fee per Unit: ______ _ Total Fees: __ _ Traffic Impact Fee/ Fee Per Unit: fO ADT Bridge and Thorough fare Fee Fee Per Unit: Z2. / AbT . Public Facilities Fee required. Total Fee: 2, gt:,C> Total Fee: S. \ ~ '2.. Facilities Management Fee Zone:_';j-_S" ___ Fee: tJo Fee. Sewer Fees Permit No. SE.91DC<9°i EDU's b,S,xlf,10=-to,S<::,l, &O Benefit Area: F:=. Bl'\>< l..~t,.-:. .: ... ·,. Fee:_·_. ·_-l _b_,_3_2 ___ $_._2._t..\ -4i'Df. S7tt.J ,Z.'i ' 28 •. sewer Lateral Required: _____________ _ Fee: _______ _ 0 29. REMARKS: ____________ ....._ _________ _ zo AD½ooo ~ OFF X H.1 ~04 ci-::; 23b ENGINEERING AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE PERMIT . DATE: __ t __ 't)_-_l __ r_-_9 ....... /...._ __ EDU= P:\DOCS\MISFORMS\FRM0010.DH REV. 02/27/91 1Ja t e, ~Q l {o,\:\\. ~ Prepared by 1 _. ~ lLA y.Q... >, Jurisdiction U-1 \~'oe-4 VALUATION AND ?LJ.H CHECK FEE PLAN CH'ECK NO, . Cb C\ \-\511 (J::: )_ BUILD!HG ADDRESS a~8C 12'..u3£+, '\~~~ r:A . . . -. o Bldg. Dept. ~Esgil AP?LICANT/CONTACT ~ ....... d'c:c,;,..,.::;,\Ti.CJ PHONE NO, ::\5'L ~\3~ BUILDING OCCUPANCY · J::;;z-2. DESIGNER PHONE ------ T'l'?_=.: OF ~CbNSTRUCTio·w . ::nr··:-~\.\(c.,.). Sf:!"-.. CONTRACTOR PHONE ____ _ 3UILDING PORTION I EU ILDING. AR:€A VALUE M e.:z .. z . ~o.&.. . (1. Y\ () I I ·. Air Conditionin£ l Co:nmerc1al 1 ·@ ..3.40 Residential I · I ra Res • or Comm .• - Total Value -$ ~ o":a· I __,___ __ _ Plan Che cl< f'ee s $ 1 ;:;i µ, '-(, c,p)? ---,.;;-----------------~---'-,-)...._..c.-...;'---"".......__ C O M 1-1 C NT~--: ---------------,------------------ SHEET C) Of CC) r ,.· ( ;. (: t: ' l ;,, ,._ '') ~·-. . ........... : ''. :1 ·.~ ,,t ', ,., • .,..i '~· ... 1 .• . .. . ~-~:· ·,· ·, : .~···~i(~;:if? ,, . : ·:. "' {~ 1 • ' :, l ' .... '.-•' ·,<, ·~' . , :;, ·, . ~ .. ' CITY OF CARLSBAD ' I~ • • • ~ 51.64 11/07/91 0001 01 02 . . C-PRMT 10354;;6,~ · rv RfJO 7c1 I . Sta~us: ISSUED Appl~ed: · Apr/I.s ~ue ! · E:Xpi)?ect.: 10/17/91 11/07 /91, P:cepar¢ct: .By: MCL ., ' I ,.' ':. ,• • '., ' ,_-, , • ' ' • ' ~.' ' ~ . ·,···,{• . ·.: : ·:. . ' ,, . ' ' .-.; ·, '~~_.----:::":·~·-----~ ----- ,, ~.; .oo .oo 10,354.64 .·.<.e:xt fee Da.ta ----~--~--------- ' < .. ' ·. :::-,. 2075 Las Palmas Dr'., Carlsbad,'.CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 ~ ~ . I . ~ ~ ( ~ ~ C) QI QI ~ ~ co co Q Q ~ljj, ~ ~ ... N 'II: 'II: ~ ~ u u QI QI • • u u C C CII CII ..;;, -~ ~ QI ~ co Q I ~ !i.1 ~ u QI • u C ~ ~ PLANNING CHECKLlSf Plan Che~~ Nq. q/-/37 7 Address Z2-6C f½,m~P-!v R.-o. Planner 1/~,J /,YNd= Phone 438-1161 ext. _// __ J_~_.> ___ _ (Name) APN: 2/ ?-061-/0_ +// Type of Project and Use IJJDttf;"J.idAL T.:L Zone ( M Facilities Management Zone _____ _ 'Legend [1] Item Complete D Item Incomplete -Needs your action 1, 2, 3 Number in circle indicates plancheck number where deficiency was identified ifo O Environmental Review Required: YES _ NO ~ 1YPE __ ____ DATE OF COMPLETION: Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval-------------------------------- Discretionary Action Required: YES NO P"-1YPE ~-- APPROVAI./RESO. NO. __ _ DATE: _______ _ PROJECT NO. ___ _ OTHER RELATED CASES:------------------------- Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval _______________________ _ California Coastal Commission Permit Required: YES _ NO ~ DATE OF APPROVAL: San Diego Coast District, 3111 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 200, San Diego, CA. 92108-1725 (619) 521-8036 Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval----------------------------- r, ~ 0 Landscape Plan Required: YES _ NO ~ r:(9 D cioo See attached submittal !equirements for landscape plans Site Plan: 1. 2. 3. 4. 1. 2. 3. 4. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to sc~e. Show: North arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way width and dimensioned setbacks. Show on Site Plan: Finish floor elevations, elevations of finish grade adjacent to building, existing topographical lines, existing and proposed slopes and driveway. Provide legal description of property. Provide assessor's parcel number. Setbacks: Front: Int. Side: Street Side: Rear: Lot coverage: Height: Parking: Required Required Required Required Required Required Spaces Required Guest Spaces Required Shown ------___ Shown __ ___ Shown __ ___ Shown __ ___ .Shown __ ___ Shown __ 3// .Shown .Js-o Shown ------ OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER r/. w L DATE (o · ?..J-r I 'PLNCK.FRM October 24, 1991 Mr. Van Lynch CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 Las Palmas Carlsbad, California 92009-4859 Re: Callaway Golf -Office Tenant Improvement 2285 Rutherford Road, Carlsbad Piancheck #91-1390 Dear Van, Smith Consulting Architects Architecture and Planning I am submitting the parking calculations for the above-referenced project in response to the planning checklist comments dated October 16, 1991. PARKING REQUIRED: Office -41,292 s.f. (4 spaces/1000 s.f.) Proposed Manufacturing -47,546 s.f. (1 space/400 s.f.) Proposed Warehouse -32,592 s.f. (1 space/1,000 s.f. first 20,000 s.f.) (1 space/2,000 s.f. second 20,000 s.f.) PARKING PROVIDED: TOTAL 311 spaces 165 spaces 119 spaces 27 spaces 350 stalls Manufacturing and Warehouse are indicated as proposed because these areas are not being built-out under this permit. We will be resubmitting for a separate permit within a few weeks. uire any further information. ML/tm 9868 Scranton Road • Suite 150 • San Diego, California 92121 • (619) 452-3188 • Fax (619) 452-3907 ~ 2560 ORION WAY CARLSB).D, CA ~2008 TELEPHONE (619) 931-2121 <ttitp of Carlibab FIRE DEPARTMENT PLAN CH ECK REPORT PAGE 1 OF_ Al>PRO'° DISAPPROVED PLAN CHECK# 1· I-f'\ 1/) PROJECT __ ~_f...._'_L._~_·_j~v~J_r-_~_~:_· __ C~~u_t--~----ADDRESS -~*-~=~~!-\~-~R=-~·J_·-~, -"~~~iL--~~0_,_·~~(~'-------- ARCHITECT bF,--!U:-t ~N<,rC)t...J OWNER LA.Q w 'tJ Yl,,'.UH.: ..... ( f/t.c. FG:n,. ·" OCCUPANCY _ __.f ... -.--"=,;...~--CONST. -r!I · (HJE° t•(> ,(\.. TOTAL SQ. FT. 1'2.. t 1Ll<) 1 ~. STORIES _r'l-=v ____ _ ~ SPRINKLERED ~ TENANT IMP. APPROVAL OF PLANS IS PREDICATED ON CONFORMING TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS AND/OR MAKING THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS: PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND PERMITS -2::... 1. Provide one copy of: floor plan(s); site plan; sheets __ 2. Provide two site plans showing the location of all existing fire hydrants within 200 feet of the project. __ 3. Provide specifications for the following: --L--4. Permits are required for the installation of all fire protection systems~,enp~~stand pipes, dry chemical, halon, CO2, alarms, hydrants). Plan must be approved by the fire department prior to installation. __ 5. The business owner shall complete a building information letter and return it to the fire department. FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT _::__ 6. The following fire protection systems are required: p ~ Automatic fire sprinklers (Design Criteria: -~A=-..c.';_..,_f_6_1l_-~t-""J __ f"_f,_.__A,,.___f _3> __________ _ D Dry Chemical, Halon, CO2 (Location: ________________________ _ D Stand Pipes (Type: -------------------------------0 Fire Alarm (Type/Location: ____________________________ _ _ .. ,_7, Fire Extinguisher Requirements: ~ One 2A rated ABC extinguisher for each , ;,, vs.l sq. ft. or portion thereof with a travel distance to the nearest extinguisher not to exceed 75 feet of travel. ca An extinguisher with a minimum rating of ) r.... , ,, C '-to be located: n 'i''\, t. ¢ A. r;,, ,, "-' s D Other: ___________________________________ _ __ 8. Additional fire hydrant(s) shall be provided _______________________ _ EXITS ~ 9. Exit doors shall be openable from the inside without the use of a key or any special knowledge or effort. _::t_ 10. A sign stating, " This door to remain unlocked during business hours" shall be pla~-~bo\7e-the main exit 811d doors ,... D \..,. \ -2!_ 11. EXIT signs (6" x (" letters) shall be placed over all required exi~s and directional signs located as necessary {o clearly indicate the location of exit doors. GENERAL __ 12. Storage, dispensing or use of any flammable or combustible liquids, flammable liquids, flammable gases and hazardous chemicals shall comply with Uniform Fire Code. __ 13. Building(s) not approved for high piled combustible stock. Storage in closely packed piles shall not exceed 15 feet in height, 12 feet on pallets or in racks and 6 feet for tires, plastics and some flammable liquid&.H high stock pil- ing is to be done, comply with Uniform Fire Code, Article 81. __ 14. Additional Requirements.------------------------------ H&n 1c S t n re..,.,·· ., , 1 r~. t· . -~· 1 C "" 1 __ 15. Comply with regulations on attached sheet(s). tv.1 -,, ·\ Plan Examine, __ __,_I'_·_·,"-~-'-'_' _J ---'-""-'-""',._:,'.,_:..;__, _·_'-·_· _______ _ -:..< r Date ______ _,__ _ __,_ ___ _ Report mailed to architect ___ Met with ___________ , ___ _ __ Attach to Plans .. ~ S~ Structural Engineering • 15375 Barranca Pkwy. • Suite A-201 • Irvine. CA 9271 B • (714) 727-9,070 SKT STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS FOR. REVISION TO MEZZANINE CALLAWAY GOLF CARLSBAD, CALIFORN·IA 1988 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE ·SKT JOB #T91046 PLEAS~ NOTE THE FOLLOWING: COMPUTATI.ONS INVOLVING SCIENTIFIC PRIJ:fCIPLES ONLY SERVE AS A GUIDE FOR THE EXPERIENCED ENGINEER AND ONLY ASSIST HIM IN MAKING ENGINEERING DECISIONS. : THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS REFLECT· THE .TOTAL DECISION MAKING PROCESS.· ANY EVALUAION OF THE ENGINEERING DECISIONS MADE BY SKT STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING SHOULD BE BASED ONLY ON A REVIEW OF' THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 1988 OBC EXISTING MEZZANINE OFFICE DEAD LIVE STORAGE LOADS: DEAD LIVE WIND: EXPOSURE C SEISMIC: ZONE 4 DESIGN SUMMARY LOADS: JOISTS BEAMS = 47.0 PSF 49.0 = 50.0 PSF 50.0 = 27.0 PSF 29.0 = 125.0 PSF 125.0 PSF PSF PSF PSF CALLAWAY GOLF T9-1046 rM'II; 3~ Structural Engineering SK ... 23141 VardugoOr.eSuiee200 ·Laguna Hilla.CA 82B!53 (- CP.J.LAwAy C:OLF-J081«>.----1-~;----- ggv1se;.p HE=-it.:e, BY.....:.:-~~-=--- ~lE.v..l Dffi-tJ I~ DATE-----l..J...../-S~- .Q.x1 S.tl-N ~ ~MIA.fk:? SKT.,..-, --t---'~--- ! 1 • _ I · i ·1.' ! : 1 1 '. j ! i ; i I • , I ~-· ---------, ~-; .. : .. ! . ;-: : I -==~-=Hwnucf._~-o_~_e __ -~~~~--:_. ____ ~ __ : ____ : __ :_'__'"'. ! : , ·,,: . : ~ ~ -:c:_ . '·' . . . . E.x:, sn~~-_-_~0r~ ,·_ ~ ~ --· .-------------. -------------- .< -~ ------- I \ 2:3141 Verdugo Or-.• Buice 200 L.aguna Hilla CA 92Se!S r• C CALLAWAY {doLf: .all«>. 141040 ...... 1<;fv...........,._-'-"'1SE:;.a--.... t?...___._H~'ei-------=!t..~~:.L-. __ av_-___ _ ----------DA,,.._ ___ _ i:.X-' $TI Nc-t f:\gAH i:~.u;.., SKT 12. OF (p · ---~------------·---··-, , 1 \ ; : -: ! I , 1 1 I , -·-·--------·-------·--·--· ---------·-----~------·_,' f' 't'' I:':'! I ! l i;: ~-;1. :· ' ' _, ___ i _· ----'--==e1ra:K==giq$f~-~=±1~5-. . .. --. -? ,-rr-t . . .. . ' --..._~!2. 5 -' : ' I': ' -, i j . 'f I . : -. ~~r~=r~J~--=------------l ' : ' ' ' ' : ' , .c, ; cu~-. ' ~,zjo/[e2)(~1:i.77o~eC!J~~3.I,,:: : ; • • •: i; • :~i: t i:, • · :l ':: • --=;::7JJ~;z4ii(f:z1;1s:4&..:BG'F ~s:2ff : ·_ · • · • : · -___ L : i : ·: -·_: __ _ =!f ,.;f :ii:~>=¾-=~~-~~~~~:~-~~=-~+~~'~--~:~-~= =-==-~~-AAw.,~: ... -'--~~u.G '> Qt '1 ~o _·_ '-'J~ __ -:_ ______ __ _ -c·· ___ ~=-~---_ ~ _________ _ ~~: _v-= ?--4 1o.* ,. ·· ·-:~=~~~~:-~-~: _ ~~--~~~- ~--==-· '!~--1=. ~\¢XJ--:a > ~9~:o·--1F-.D_~ -~ _ _ _ ___ :~: ... ~~-~~~--------------- f:-~1-&¼::t=.:.iots.l~c.?~ . ---~----------------·-----------~ ----------c .. .1.c;;.K:--c ~- 1 ,::;:i:~ -~~~~ ~ ~-:· .: ~-~ --_ --· -----=~-~--__ ·-:-=_ ----------------~--_r.::t~, -~/"--._~±-~ l--l~W -~·-·----· -~-----------------. -~~~----------· : ::; w: ;(52){ 41;~).. is:6-e~:~ ~ :-;---,{--~-~------~~ ~~ ~ --: ~: · : y.Ji-::: QS.S)(\iz.5-2, .. ~o)-:: ll?60flf _ · 1-2 ·-· _ . · -------: --II : B~2, 1 , .. ~ sfL. ~ · +t (o/'~ I ,-J 3 <( 4 i 4-\I.J ~ b = 12 I (~/ __. 1-/ri. 5,;). V = G:,~. 11<.. AR = 4 ,13 1N 2. I " ;1 r1 I II / r SKT Structural Engineering 2314·1 Verdugo CJr. •· Suil;e 200 Laguna Hilla CA 928153 --------'------'----------DATE---------~ =g~X: ...... l $"'+){: ...... I N<:1~--tf-· f<-A~-H ....... t----"~---SHT-~-=--OF·-c,_ f • ! ; ! ' ! I ; ! -' • ! 1 • < : ' ! ' 1 : : ' I I 1 ( i ' ; ' j : ' ' ' I . . : I • 1 . ' I d~ttttt~~~:. i ·j ! ,' ' --,--,--'"-+-t--+--------,-..----,--,--;---11--,-~ i ! i ., ! ,---,----,--: ~--bQ~l5-€.:KtS1J.clG-. ~,-j.' -I -+-, ~, -:-, -,--:-: :..+-' : ---------,-. --.C-----+-----i:--:--, --.! -;-- ! _ l ._, l ~ l • _ <!'I ': 1 i' , ! J ,--..._ --;,-;-,-411 ::[Q~ L.ec:.)80.:=c:)NI _:Y, ! I I l : ' I l I ' ' ! : I 1 . -~ f-V-~,--.t : I • ---1 : ll ' l I I I I ! ! I 1 ' ' I I j ! ' : ' 1• • , -I • ---·-------1------------··--·------.. --·----- ,---------------- ____ ,. ____ ----. ------- ----------------·---------------------------------------·-----.-------------------~-----· ----------------------------------' ----·-- ----·------~ -· -------------------------- ( ( re,,, 3~ Structural Enginetering s K -2:3141 VardugoOr.• Suiee200 ' Laguna HIiia. CA 9281:5:3 BY------:-- ' ' . : .; ·-! • ----· -·~ c::.I -2\'"" I . H /_ I t:2...M ·? 'b ~ i:::,_z_ .\0, t..., '.'.-"-I. -------·--. ·--... ------ -------- ( ( ( CALLAW;c« &oLf [<E:.Vl'SlDN 11) Ht:=l.:Z. av _________ _ 23141 Verdug0 Or.• Suita.200 Laguna Hille. CA 928153 s ............ r:o=....;R::..r..Ab....;·~e-· __,L=· 0-..A<-->.aaa~'SIL-_DA"IE----- ......,,N ...... ec.z..:w..,___· --.E-AAM~-....,..,,..,,_te2 ___ . SlfT 'S OF 0 · I ' • :-' I ' ' • ' i I j j • ' ' ! I ' ' • : , ' I 1 j ' I I • 1 ' 1 : ' , • ' . i , · ; , 1 • ; : , ' , ; '. ~ ; : : 1, ! , t I : • 1 1---'----,-c-~~~tosiu;!:Cl{)cts=foo;c[cl@: : : :. : ' : ; 1 1 . I ' l . ' I -· ·-·· 0 -· ·\ q + f'.': 0 ·--. --F"" _-: . '. l· ?. ----. -• -. . .. I ----·---X .. _ · I .. q .. 0 I .. -···----------·· ·-----·--·--·--·---·-· , .. i:======== =:~~!:-~~:-~~~--'--~~--~------------~:-~--------~--==·-------------~-==~ -~ ~u~s ~-1~d! __ -5s2_:=~-~ . ____ ------· ---·_ --_. ____ ----'----: ' ---' ·_. ' ~ ·-· -~1-tL1,~;-;rAD--_:__ ~----·--------_·_ ---------·.·. -~ ----_--------·---------__ ._·; 1 . · _ . -·=·-fT~, W1 ~~ .. -~_+=· ~~ ( ( ' CA.LLA WA. Y ·c.2,oL.f ·.GINO. T4 I b4<P Re;.v1s10"1 TD Mez'=· BY_,:._·----:-- _......;...._....;..... ________ DATE------_ ____.,____._ __ ========== SHT V, OF ~ i I : i ! : I i ' I I : I l i ! I J \ • j I ! : i ; \-. -· . ----~-:-- -.. ·----·-·--. ----··------ · 11 II fr II ·I i . I I. ,~ 1,; 1- 1 :1: t·. ,~ F .... ,~ I>·\ r ,. I ! . I I~ .. ,- 1~ ... ,= I,. J' I~ .. ,;; ~~'';/: f/}· PRELIMINARY .GEOTECHNICAL_ STUDY, f': ·: .. f CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER ., LOTS 16, 18 AND 19, 'TRACT 81-10, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA .FOR LARWIN~ROSEDALE. :PROPERTIES 16255 VENTURA -BOULEVARD, SUITE 900 ENCINO, CALIFORNIA 91436 W. 0.. ·98-9-:SD MARCH 14, 1989 ::: ;. f .d.,. '.· ,t,. ·,.:' ---, . -• .. -..,. .;-; .. , · .. , ·:-'• ... _ . i' r,. • < ~~-. :M -:•· • .. =.:: •.:. -. -.-· .:' -,_• -; ~ .: -: ;'::-~--~; .:· -,. ·- .. . -· .. ~~:>23:}/ -~~:\tl . ~,~;~: (:~:t~1i,fM~chanics .,. Geology·• Foundation Engineering ~· .. -tf}}tf l~.!~.t.Il( ··· ~ •• /-/ :. ,ah·. ,.· .. -.. , .... - TABLE OF CONTENTS ,.,ROPOSED SITE DEVELOPMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . rITE DESGRIPTION •••••••••••••••• · !XPLORATION .AND TESTING ........... . . . . . . . . . . . . ' · Earth Materials • . . • . • . I-Fill Materials . . • . • . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Terrace Materials ••...•.. ,_, Santiago Formation . . . . . . . . . . . ,.. Point Loma Formation • . • . • . ;.. ;ROUNDWATER • • • • . • • • • •. . . • • • • • • • •. • • • I.ECOMMENDATIONS • • • • • •· • ;; Existing Slopes 1-': Fill Placement ,~OUNDATIONS General Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., '!onstruction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Moderately Expansive Soils •.....• . . . . . . . . . .1.-Highly Expansive Soils .•.•• . .. . . . . . . . f. C' '}OST ''· \;"..'.. Retaining Walls • • . • . . • Drainage . . . . • • . • . • . • . . • GRADING CRITERIA • • • • Trench Backfill , ..... . . . . . . . l,DDITIONAL GRADING ••••• , .... '".eRELIMINARY PAVEMENT DESIGN • • • • • • • • • • • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,~,imLIMINARY PAVEMENT DESIGN • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ·. Subgrade, Subbase and Aggregate Base Compaction l·~RADING GUIDELINES . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • i, l . 'IMITATIONS . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • I • ·L.,~ ,. l -_ .I·· GeoSoils, .lne. 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 6 7 7 8 8 8 9 9 10 13 14 14 14 15 15 16 18 19 19 I I: I . ' I I. 1· I: I.~ ' .. ~ l - I- r:-:_~ I: 2~~ '·'.: t-:· I: L..- 1:. , .. l I· '. l I ,.-. I: '. .· I; ,; Geotechnical Engineering • Engineering Geology 5751 Palmer Way, Suite D • Carlsbad, California 92008 • (619) 438-3155 ~ FAX (619) 931-0915 March 14, 1989 W.O. 989-SD LARWIN~ROSEDALE PROPERTIES 16255 Ventura Boulevard, suite 900 Encino, California 91436 .Attention: Subject: Referenc;:e: Gentlemen: Mr. Matt ·Haines Preliminary Geotechnical study, Carlsbad Research Center Lots 16, 18 and 19., .Tract 81-10, Carlsbad, California "As-Graded Geotechnical Report, Rough Grading Completed, Carlsbad Research Center, Phase I, Carlsbad Tract No. 81-10, Carlsbad, California 11 , .by San Diego Soils Engineering, Inc., Job No. SD 1144-10. dated April 12, 1982 for The Koll Company This report presents the results of our preliminary Geotechn~cal study, on previously graded Lots 16, 18 and 19 of Carlsbad Tract· 81-10 in the City of Carlsbad, California. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the nature of subsurface earth materials on site, ascertain their engineering properties, and to provide recommendations for site preparation, foundation design, retaining w~ll design, design. grading and pavement Los Angeles Co. (818) 785-2t5$ ~ Orange (:;o. (n4) 647°0277 ~ ~iverside Co. (714) 677-9651 ·I I. I. I • a I ,. t.·.: I · .. ~ .. 1. ' :::· I. \:~ . ~ I 1.-. . . ' ~- I· I I ,, l·- I, '. I I. LARWIN-ROSEDALE PROPERTIES MARCH 14, 1989 w.o~ 989-SD PAGE 2 This study included review of the referenced report, drilling eleven exploratory test borings, obtaining representative soil samples, laboratory testing and analysis, and the preparation of this report. PROPOSED SITE DEVELOPMENT Information concerning the proposed development was furnished by Mr. Matt Haines, Director of Construction for Larwin-Rosedale Properties and Ms. Smith of Smith ·Consulting Architects who provided a J,.11 =30' Scale Site Plan. It is . our .understanding that minor re-grading is proposed to cr~ate level pad(s) for 30 to 32 f·oot high concrete tilt-up industrial buildings and parking lot(s). In the event that any significant changes in the design or location of the building as outlined in this report are planned, the conclusions and recommendations contained in this report shall not be considered valid unless changes are reviewed and the conclusions of this report modified or approved in writing by the geotechnical consultants. GeoSoils, Ine. I .-. I I -I I .- I_ ~ ...... I r.::· ~.:.'".:•" I- L:;. - I. ( ' I :~.;.· ' .. ·. I. ,_ I I. I. \ I- I •/ ~WIN-ROSEDALE PROPERTIES w.o. -989-SD SITE DESCRIPTION MARCH 14, 1989 PAGE 3 The property is located within Carlsbad Research Center; Carlsbad Tract Number 81-10. The irregular-shaped site comprises Lots 16, 18 and: 1~. The site is bounded on the south by McClellan-Palomar Airport. on the west, a ten(±) foot high fill slope descends onto Lot 22, where an existing industrial building is located. On the east, a thirteen(±) foot high cut slope ascends to a lot where an existing industrial building is situated. Rutherford Road compr~ses the northern boundary of Lot 16. Developed Lots 17 and .20 -are located no:rth of Lots 18 and 19 respectively. Access to the parcel is off the cul-de-sac portion of Pascal court. An ILS Critical Zone (Instrument Landing System) encroaches appro~imately 75(±) feet onto.the southern por~~ons of the lots. Sparse t}?.in grasses and small wild plants are located on the relatively flat site. A l:;>aseball backstop with localized hay bails a•re situated on Lot 19. EXPLORATION AND TESTING The site was explored on February 15, 1989 by drilling 11 test borings. Borings varied in -depth from 5 to 1 7 feet. Boring . GeoSoils, lne. I I ' I I I- I ,. I ,. .... -- i..- I ;, . . '•.· •.··.- 1. .I·- !· ,. i'. t: I 1·. ,. 1. 1-_. 1-; ·1- 1 LARWIN~ROSEDALE PROPERTIES W.O. 989-SD MARCH 14, 1989 PAGE 4 locations are shown on the enclosed Grading Plan, Plates land 2, which uses .a 1"=3-0' scal·e provided by Brian Smith Engineer, Inc. _Earth materials encountered are. logged on Plates A-1 through A- ll. Samples were tested as ·indicated in Appendix II. Earth Materials Earth materials · within the subject area consist of artificial f.il.l ,. ·terraqe materials and bedrock from both the Santiago (Eocene Age) .and the Point Loma Formation (Cretaceous Age). Fill Materials Fill materials, situated on Lot 19 and portions of Lot 18, were placed with selective testing. -and . observation provided by San Diego .So.il .· Engineering, Inc (Re.ferenced Report). Their compaction test results indicated that fill soils-were placed at least optimum moisture contents and at a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent. c:iescrepancy from this. our . testing finds no significant The fill is comprised of clays, clayey sands and silty sandy clays. Boring B-1 through B-4 excavated soils that appeared to be reworked topsoil and/or ·terrace materials. Based on the referenced report and our lab9ratory results, the materials are considered suitable for support of the proposed structures. GeoSoils, lne. 1::· .... :· I I 1-,,.·· ..... .;: .. · I:: ::· .. I:· i: ~. -.:-.· I, 1--.,·.: 1-. 1·:•. .. ..... · I .. I I·· ··-·-·· I:· ~i ' . __ ,. I. 1- LARWIN-ROSEDALE PROPERTIES W.O. 98.9-SD MARCH 14, 1989 PAGE 5 Fill thickness may be estimated. from individual borings placed on the subject property, and informationl)resented in the referenced report. These profiles i:;hould not be construed to reflect any variation which may occur between these borings. Terrace Materials Terrace materials were observed to underlie fill in Boring B-4. As n0ted in Referenc~ 2, these materials consisted predominantly of reddish b~own clayey sands· an:d sandy clays with variable · amounts of cobbles. The materials varied from moist to slightly moist and medium dense with no v.isible porosity. In some cases this· unit may have been reworked. While moisture content fluctuated, testing indicates adequate density. "Dry" undisturbed terrace materials (See Boring B-4, Appendix I) can display rapid consolid.ation when water is introduced. However when tested for ·this under l.oading, conditions the material shows little s.ensitivity to water (see Laboratory Testing section Appendix II) • Santiago Formation (Eocene Age): (map. symbol Tsa) onsite, this material is light greenish gray to gray with common orange oxide stained silty claystone with localized sandy beds. · This formation was f.ound to be medium dense highly fractured and slightly moist to locally moist. GeoSoils, Ine. I I 1: I. l_- 1 I.· -"-:· .. _. ,:~ !·._,:- I_·: . ~ .• I. ,;·:· 1 .. I~. 1~. I: ~ ~!'.. I I~: -~ I._ I- I. LARWIN-ROSEDALE "PROPERTIES W.O. 989-SD MARCH 14, 1989 PAGE 6 Point Loma Formation· (Cretaceous Age): (map symbol Kpd) ons·ite;-this material consisted of gray and brown sandstones and claystones. moist. This formation was found to be medium dense and GROUNDWATER Groundwater was not encountered, which is a favorable condition . . We do no.t:,. anticipate groundwater to effect site development. RECOMMENDATIQNS According to preliminary plans provided to us, additional grading -will be required to develop the site. .Proposed grading will require cut and fill grading within existing fill materials and bedrock. The proposed building on Lot .16, currently a cut lot, will require · up to three and one--half (±) feet of fill on the northwestern portion and up to two and one-half (±) feet of cut · on the southeastern portion .• The proposed building on Lots 18 and 19, curr.ently tra,nsi tion lots, will span the contact between fill e~rth materials and bedrock. In order to provide a more uniform foundation support condition, it is recommended that the cut .portion underlying the building pads be overexcavated and replaced as properly compacted fill. GeoSoils, .Inc. I I I I I I •1 I l Ii -i { 11 I; I Ii ! ( It ~ It Ir 11 I:. " LARWIN-ROSEDAiAE PROPERTIES W.O. 989-SD MARCH 14, 1989 PAGE 7 ?'Lixu? The ·building should be underlain by. ~:2~;_:,§~;~}t-e~t·: o·f j~LL ~ ~o~ae:ted':'~ll.'r"~be1cw!:4-t:fi~"'flliafil:oiifrii:,ff~fi'eli5i:~J'~a~i:ooting·s:.1aha·· .:fi:v.e ·.,:\ ·~;.i.~f..:..J.~./ .. i:ll.•~ .... ,~ .. ...:-' ' •• ~ I• • • -o ~,;".z;.t ..... i! .. --~ ...... ,i,,~,1'-1,~:u-:f,~~ ~~~,..:,.,.. • .. ~---,,_ O ~--H • . • _, ... """'"'~'..t';..., ..... ,.~,.";t!"'..~-... {r'", -·,--__., .• :"~....._,., ... ~--~··-::,,.:;,-, -S:~--::.+~~i"!'',;o~" c,,:"!".....-... -, -~ ... ' ~~~_y:ema.~ :,;the. ::outside. ·,eqge:::;:o;f.:2t.:b:~3£otindati.:ons. In addition, .,-:;__._,_-~--'=' ~ ...... ~:...-., • .any ·existing fill should be . reprocessed to a minimum depth of one(±) foot. i I The following recommendations are preliminary, based upon current). inf opnation.. ~l~~,~~;s:~,filtl!t~~J:Ai~~~,;~ii~Z~~ib.l.Jia,_:,;~e. Additional recommendations i.f required could be made at that time. Existing Slopes Existing fill and cut slopes. are at a 2: 1 gradient or flatter. The .highest cut siope appears to be no greater than 13 (+) feet; located east of Lot 16.. The highest fill slope appears to be no greater that 10(±) feet, located west of Lot 19. The referenced report by San Diego Soils Engineering, Inc. indicates that the existing perimeter slopes are grossly stable. Fill Placement Guidelines for fill placement are presented in the· Grading Guidelines presented in Appendix III. GeoSoils, lne. I I I I I. I: I. I" ·-.: .1-. 1- 1- ·-~ I- I I_ LARWIN-ROSEDALE PRO~ERTIES W.O. 989-SD MARCH 14, 1989 PAGE 9 1,500 pounds per square foot may be employed to determine resistance to lateral loads. 4. All footings should be .in accordance with requirements of the City · of Carlsbad Building Department and the Uniform Building Code regarding width and depth. _ Construction Laboratory· test -data and our observations indicate that near- surf ace soils on the si.te will vary · from moderately to ·very highly expansive in nature. The expan~_i ve_ nature of the soils should be evaluated when. regrading has been accomplished. While it should .be avoided if feasible, it appears that highly to very highly expansive soils may be placed at pad grade. Moderately Expansive Soils ' l_. Exterior footings should be founded at a minimum depth of 18 1(-r 2. inches below the lowest adjacent ground surface. Interior f.ootings may be founded at a depth of 12 inches below the lowest adjacent ground surface. All footings should ,be reinforced with two No. 4 reinforcing bars, one placed near the top and one placed near the bottom of the footing. ~~~:~-n~tr. -.,\t;.beam;:,, 1 re inf creed as above, and at least 12 inches wicle should be~~'yJ,ae!;_Iaeio'ss~arReil;;Jen'.titcfn~~,;~:-: The base of 'iif:!"~. ,µ~,..~--,.._,.,,__,~~ .. -::::,..~,.!._,k: •• J:J:::e2.: .... ~ ... 'd~'i!--·~-----~ the grade beam should be at the same elevation as the bottom of adjoinipg footings. GeoSoils, Inc. i I I I: ... I. ,,'. I> r·. t: .~ I_: I I I: I :.-.- ·---·· I: I.' I j LARWIN-ROSEDALE PROPERTIES W.O. 989-SD MARCH 14, 1989 PAGE 10 3. ~ncr¢~$l~hs., where moisture condensation is undesirable, ~~~~3.Tu<P.f.:~~-~~~Q,t\~-¾$All¢.;..~~~.1k4~1'~4't.R~~,9,:;;,;~~h{·:._._·· ~;;~t.ict~~~~:~, 4 ~,-_.· __ , ... -...... .,..... -. :;~ .. ;,r_.,..,"11'_. atj,·s· ..,· .'".'7 .. ·rhoul.d 'b h,,..~~,,..,-~,,-:,,:, ... M"a . +-k·,,,a.,,:i.,u,;r.:,,,.:,,_...__~....,.,;,bM'~·-,A, ·;•,:•a.: . • ~..,,u,..,~.,.,_-=-..., . e ~.Qe W1 ~--~~ ,:rs::~.:<-, · All slab reinforcement should be~~.ic-\' to ensure positioning near the vertical midpo·int of the slab. -~-~--------~-------=:::::::::=====----....... \ ~~:a,tur.,a,t.ipn";is recomend,ed for these soil conditions. The ~~l}~~:t,~~.~~.:-:.·~: ... ~ .. ~-... -. moisture content of the subgrade soils shou~d be equal to or grater than optimum moisture to a depth of 18 inches·. below grade in the slab areas and verified by this office within 48 hours of pouring slabs .and prior to placing visqueen or . n • Highly Expansive Soils 1. Exterior footings should be founded at a minimum depth of 18 inches belo~ the lowest adjacent ground surface. Interior footings should have a minimum embedment of 18 inches below the top of the lowest adjacent concrete slab surface. However, a minimum penetration of 12 inches into the soil is required. All footings should be reinforced with a minimum GeoSoils, lne. I I . . I. I I ' I I I,;, ·1: L::. I: ~-.·· 1: I: ,,_ ___ _ I·. ::-.:-· I:- t· ., I- I._· I· .. I· I: ,. --~ - 1- .. LARWIN-ROSEDALE fROPERTIES W.O. 989-SD MARCH 14, 1989 PAGE 11 2. 3. 4. o.f fo~r #4 steel· reinforcing bars, two placed near the top and two placed near the bottom of the footing. A .grade ·beam, re inf creed as above and at least 12 inches wiae, should be utilized across large entrances. The base of the grade beam-· should b~ at the same elevation as the bottom of the adjoining footi,ngs. .. ' egui valent memb.rane' l~A'\m~jhould be provided. ~~)JP,zet.@ .. ~l.I~:~~i:~~~-~~S4~P.Y .... ~~-;,c ~~~?-;---:e:.~~!"V"':'~ ... C<J...._,~t.:~~~-~~~-:1,.~,.,-~---.. ~-t'!".,,~--.... '~-.;.~I.'-~ ........ ~-0:.,.. "< -Y'-• • itJlgh..,.,~Jl.P.-*",.;;,P..;..,,i,P.Y..;:,:;..lf~; u9~-~~~g~'!t~1fJa'.a2~~1l~i!:,, .1 ts equ 1 va 1 en t • All slab rein:fo.rcement should be supported to ensure placement near the vertical ·midpoint of the concrete. 5. Presaturation is recommended for these soil conditions. The moisture condition of each slab area should be equal to or greater than 120 percent of optimum to a depth of 18 inches below slab grade and verified by this office within 48 hours GeoSoils, lne. I . . . I ; . ~. I. I ! .. ·· : .• I: ._.·, I·;_ ~. ; .... - I- 1-',. l.~:. I.: ~---·-. .... · I· ,.· 1. I I· I:; 1-- 1. LARWIN-ROSEDALE PROPERTIES MARCH 14, 1989 W.O. 989-SD PAGE 12 of pouring slabs and prior to placing visgueen or reinforcement. Very.Highly Expansive Soils 1. Exterior footings should be founded at a minimum depth of 24 inches below the lowest adjacent .ground surface. Interior footings may have a minimum embedment of 18 inches below the top of the lowest adj:acent concrete slab surface. However, a minimum penetration of 12 inches into the soil is required. lnte-rior isolated piers are not recommended. All footings should be .reinforced with a minimum of four No. · 4 reinforcing bars, two placed near the top and two near the bottom of -the f.ootings. Isolated exterior post supports should be founded at a depth of 30 inches below .adjacent grade and tied to the main foundation. 2.. · A grade beam, rein.forced as above and a minimum 12 inches in width, should be utilized across large entrances. The base of this grade beam should ~eat the same elevation as the bottom of the -adj·oining footings. 3. Concrete slabs should be underlain with a minimum of four inches of washed sand or crushed rock. In addition, where moisture condensation is undesirable, a vapor barrier GeoSoils, lne. I : . I ;__ .. I ,. I. !, .~ I: '• . . , I ,_ 1·,. 1:-;~ : : : I;- .. I·. !·;·. •.' I, • !;~ I-~;:_~ I_ '-~ .· I: I- I- 1-- 1· I_ LARWIN-ROSEDALE PROPERTIES W .• o. 989-SD MARCH 14, 1989 PAGE 13 consisting of a minimum of s·ix mil polyvinyl chloride or equivalent membrane with all laps sealed should be provided. At least one incn of ·mc;:>ist sand snould be placed over the membrane to aid in uniform curing o.f the concrete. 4. -Concrete slabs, should be reinforced with six inch by six .inch, No. 6 by No. 6 welded wire mesh or its equivalent. All slab reinforcement should be supported to ensure placement near the vertical miq.pqint of the concrete. 5. Presaturation is .recommended f-or these soil conditions. The moisture condition of _-each slab area should be equal to or greater_ than 120 percent of optimum for highly expansive soils to a depth of 24 inches below slab grade and verified by this office within·48 hours of pouring slabs and prior to placing visqueen or reinforcement. 'Retaining Walls Retaining walls may /be designed for an equivalent fluid pressure as shown on the foliowing table; provided selective low to moderately expansive backfill is utilized. surface Slope of Retained Material Horizontal to Vertical Level 5 to 1 4 to 1 3 to 1 2 to 1 GeoSoils, lne. Equivalent Fluid Weight {pcf) 30 32 35 38 43 ·1 ' I_ I. I. r: . -~ l·- 1-: -. • ..... -·-' t_..., I,_ f .••• I. I ,~ -~ 1-- ~-- LARWIN-ROSEDALE PROPERTIES W.O. 989-SD MARCH 14, 1989 PAGE 14 Retaining walls should be provided with a pipe and gravel backdrain or weepholes·covered with a minimum of 12 inches of gravel, a compacted fill . blanket at the surface, and proper surface drainage devices. Footings-may be des.igned as per the "Foundation Recommendations" section of this report. If the passive earth P+essure is .added to the friction, then the passive pressur~ should be reduced by one third. Drainage surface water should .not be allowed to pond on the site nor ) alloweg t9 flow uncontrolled.over aily de~cending slope. Planters located adj a-cent to ·foundations should-.be sealed and properly drained. · POST GRADING CRITERIA Trench Backfill Utility trench backfill should be placed to the following standards: 1. Ninety percent of the laboratory standard if native material is used as backfill. 2. As an alternative, for the interior of the slab, clean sand having a sand equivalent value greater than 30 may be GeoSoils, .Ine. i I ) / I . ' ' , .. ':_:_} , .. 1-. .,. I. .. . '· ~. ,. I:: 1-.. I. , ... . . . I:, l.~.:; :_.~ 1--- [ ·~. ' . I·: . 1 I: :.! .. I-:· l. I::: ' I·. l-l L. . LARWIN-ROSEDALE PROPERTIES W·.O. 989-SD MARCH 14, 1989 PAGE 15 utilized and jetted or flooded in place. Observation, probing, and if deemed necessary, testing may be required to verify adequate results . 3. Exterior trenches, paralleling a footing and extending below a 1: 1 . plane projected from the outs.ide bottom edge of the footing should be compacted to 90 percent of the laboratory 4,. Sand backf.ill should not be allowed in these trench backfill areas . Density testing along with probing should be accomplished to verify the desired resul-ts . . All trench excavations should conform to all applicable .local safety codes. ADDITIONAL GRADING , . GeoSoils, Inc. should be notified in advance of any additional fill placement, regrading of tne site, or trench backfilling . after rough grading has been completed . PRELIMINARY PAVEMENT DESIGN Representative samples of near subgrade materials were obtained and tested for "R"-Values. with ASTM test D-2844-69. Testing was performed in accordance GeoSoils, lne. I ' , .. '. I. I •• ,. I. l l. I _, ,I. ,·. I ··. I ". l·< -: : •. _~ I t. ~· ... · .. ,, (,<.· I L· ,I: I:, : . ~-- 1:-1"'· 1-- -1 I: :.-· I. 1..;_A I~- 1- LARWIN-ROSEDALE PROPERTIES W.O. 989-eSI;) MARCH 14, 1989 PAGE 16 The structural pavement sections are designed according to the .fo.llowing b~s.ic f orrnulas.: Gravel Equivalent GE= 6.0032 (T.I.) (100-R) Gravel ·Equivalent.GE= (Tac .x Gf) + (Tbase x Gf) T.I. = Traffic Index R = 11R11·-value Tac = Thickness (inches) of asphaltic concrete -Tbase = 'l;'hickness Cinches) of aggregate base Gf = Gravel Equivalent Factor The gravel equivalent factors for various pavement components as presented in "Flexible Pavement Structural Section Design Guide for California Cities and Counties, Third Edition", published by the California De.partment o·f Transportation, are as follows: .Pavement .Component Asphalt Concrete Cla$S II Aggregate Base Traffic Index 7.0 6.0 5.0 4.'5 PRELIMINARY PAVEMENT DESIGN Gravel Equivalent Factor. Gf-- 2.14 2.32 2.5 2.5 1.1 Preliminary pavement sections presented below are based on the "R'i-Value data and the assumed traffic indexes, and based on the guidelines in the "Flexible Pavement Structural Section Design Guide ,for · California Cities and Counties". To provide a range GeoSoils, Inc. I I. :·· I ' 1- :: I I f!.~ 1: .: ... - 1 t::· .. ·1. .. .. • -1:- 1- ', 'I.-: I -I- I-- 1- ·1. ._",.;: ,. LARWIN-ROSED~ PROPERTIES W.O. 989-SD MARCH 14, 1989 PAGE 17 for cost comparisions, three alternatives for each pavement . section are presented bel.ow: Tra·ffic Area Heavy Trucks and Entrance Areas Heavy Trucks .and Entrance Areas Moderate.Traffic Moderate Traffic Pc;1.rking Lanes Parking Lanes Parking stalls Parking stalls Traffic Index 7.0 7.0 .6. 0 6.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 4. 5 . Slibgrade "R"-Value ·. 5 , 9 5 9 5 9, 5 9 A.C. Thickness (Inches) 4.0 5.0 6.0 Aggregate Base Thickness (Inches) 15.5 (1) 13. 5 (1) 11.5 (1) 3.0 14.0 ( 1) (1) (1) 4.0 11.5 5.0 9.5 ~4-~----l~ 13.0 4.0 11.0 5.0 8.5 3.0 10.0 3.5 9.0 4.0 7.5 <::f:"-· -~---------3.0 9.0 3.5 8.0 4.0 7.0 2.5 9.5 3.0 8.5 3.5 7.0 (1)) (1) (1) (1) ( 1) (1) (l}_) ( 1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) Denotes class II iggregate Base (R=S0, SE~ 50) _\-c,.-, ,..(' r_.,. .. { ccYW, i ~ .. ")-;")."!. ' • '\ ~ ,..;..· \\A,· \ ,\ \ \;2C -v''' .I r\"·t 6 , Wf V ' 06\ 0.J-3. f; GeoSoils, lne. I .··~:·· I ·I 1. ,· .. • 1-- , .,. '•' I. ~ . ~ I:· 1-. 1: , .. ,I: ' . 1-:. I LARWIN-ROSEDALE PROPERTIES w~o. 989-so MARCH 14, 1989 PAGE 18 All section changes should pe properly transitioned. If adverse conditions are encountered during . the preparation of subgrade materialsr special construction methods may need to be employed. Final pavement section desi9n s}1ould be based on testing performed after grading is complete.. The traffic index should also be verified. · .;rf adverse conditions are encountered during preparation of subgrade, special construction methods may need to be employed. All sect.ion changes should be properly transitioned. "R"-Values should.be verified when subgrade has been prepared. ·Subgrade, Subbase · and Aggregate· Base · Compaction .All aggregat~ base .materials and subgrade materials where asphalt is to be . placed on grade should be compacted to a minimum .relative compaction o.f 95 percent of the laboratory standard. $ubgrade areas underlying aggregate sections should also be compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 95 percent as required by The City of Car1sbad. If adverse conditions are encountered during the prepa-ration. of subgrade materials, special construction methods may need to be employed. Final pavement section desi~n should be based on testing performed after grading is complete. The traffic index should also be verified. GeoSoils, fne. I I, ':·· I: :.: •. A•~ I-i. __ ;;.,· ,,, t:. I:. I: l•. - I;. ··:; 1:, I 1· !·, I 1:.- ··--- I· L ,,, LARWIN-ROSEDALE PROPERTIES W.O. 989-SD GRADING GUI'DELINES MARCH 14, 1989 PAGE 19 Grading shoulc;l be performed to at least t]l.e minimum requirements of the Grading. Code of the -City o·f Carlsbad, Chapter 70 of the Oniform Building Code and the Grading Guidelines presented in ·Appendix III. LIMITATIONS The materials encount~red on the project site and utilized in our laboratory study are believed representative of the total area; however, soil and bedrock materials vary in character between excavations and natural outcrops. Since our study is . based upon the site materials observed, se·lE;!ctive laboratory testing, and engineering analysis, the conclusions and recommendations are professional opinions. These opinions-have been derived in accordance with current standards of practice and no warranty is expressed or implied. OeoSoils, lne. I I, I, I: I '·; . ! ,~: .11 I i . 1·:· I 1:1 1 I 11 11 I lj 11 I, L 11 Ii l 11 11 Ii LARWIN-ROSEPAEE PROPERTIES W.O. 989-SD MARCH 14, 1989 PAGE 20 If you should have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to -contact our office. Very truly yo~rs, 1142 . TE:M/ CEL/mc . Distripution: (6} Addressee Enclosures: Appendix I, Field Exploration }1.ppehdix II, Laboratory Testing Appendix .III, .G·rading Guidelines Plates 1 and 2 , .Geotechnical Maps -GeoSOil$, lne. ·1· 1· I 1-- ·1 -I - I I I I I I I I ·I I I I I.- ; Exgloration AJ;>PENDIX I FIELD EXPLORATION Field exploration was performed using a truck-mounted, rotary drilling machine with a 30~inch bucket. logged by our Staff Geologist and examination. - soils were continuously classified by visual- The approximate location of borings are indicated on the Plot Plan, Plates la and. lb.. Logs of the Borings are shown on Plates A-1 through A-11. "Relatively undisturbed" samples of soils encountered were obtained by driving a thin-walled steel sampler with successive drops -of the Kelly bar. ·The J;'equired blow count for one foot of penetration is shown on the Boring Logs, Plates A-1 through A-11. The soil-is retained .tn brass rings of 2. 365 inches inside . diameter and· 1. oo inches in height. The central portion of the sample was retained in close fitting, water tight containers. GeoSoils, lne. I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 _:. .. · .: . :- ·. ,•. , ... :·.:: ·. I- I:_ I I_. I-_. , .. ! . I: L.-,: , ... I '·. I: l ... ,_ ., -· I I 1--: ' .,, I: f._ ••• 1-. L I:: 1- BORING LOG Project: ·Larw1n-Rosedale Boring B-1 W. O. 989-SD Sheet 1 of 1 -Sample • .µ . ~ .µ -~ l'O ' ..c:: U)Q) Cl) .µ ~ ra8 ~ .Qi ,-; -0 Q) ~ sE ,-; 0 IXl IXl - [X rx: ~ - 5- ·-- IX [X 8 - 10- - - .,. ! . 15· . . . . 20- - - - - 25· . . . - 30- Carlsbad ,Research Center Lots 16, 18 and 19 Date Excavated 2-15-89 Sample Method: Drive Tube Kelly Bar -2,2181 lbs -0-24' .µ ·,-!-,-; s:: 44 0 :::i tJ ~i °' >,..,.. Cl) >, 1-l Otll 0 CL 114.2 100.0 Q) ~ ~-,;µ dP oo- ,,-f 0 ~ 14.7 23.0 Description of Material 0-6' ARTIFICIAL nLL -Multi-colored, silty sandy CLAY with corrmon green claystones fragments -stiff, variable moisture. 6-7'· ARTIFICIAL FILL/TOPSOIL(?) -Chocola!e brown-occasional gray silty CLAY, medium stiff, moderate pliable, very few cobbles, non porous, no organics, slightly sticky, moist, possibly reworked. · 7-12' BEDROCK~ Light green gray, CLAYSTONE, medium dense, brittle, slightly blocky, abundant randomly oriented fractures/joints, traces of relict rootlets, slightly moist. Note: @8' Krotovina infilled with dark brown moist sandy clay •. Total Depth= 12 Feet Hole Backfilled Plate A-1 '·. 1. 1--. '· . -~. ,_ I- i I.· ~. : I·· L..,_ 1· l· ,,. l: I:· t·.~: 1--. ;_:; I.· . :· I;-· ... I:·: ·-·- I·.-: I•' l'.,. I:._ '· -· 1· -. +J 1,1-1 - .c: +J ~ Q) Q - . - - s- ; . . 10· . . .. - 15· . . . . 20· . -. -· 25· - - -. 30· BORING LOG Project: Larwfn-Rosedale Boring B-2 W. 0. 989-S0 Sheet 1 of 1 Sample . +J 1,1-1· l'O ' rtl(l) U) ~ rdB ~ r-1 -::, s::::, r-1 i:Q b+J t:Q ~-4 rx X 5 ~-7 Carlsbad -Research Center . +J ~ +J ·rl- ,-j C: 1,1-1 0 ::, CJ ~~ ~ :>,-- ' Cl) :>, 1-1 ::, Cl)· Q CL l06.4 CL 113.7 CL 105.0 Q) 1-1 ::i-.µ dP m- •rl 0 ~ 17 .5 13.4 21.0 Date Excavated 2-15-89 Sample Method: Same as B-1 Description of Material 0-6 1 ARTIFICIAL FILL -Multi-colored, moist, medium stiff, no visible porosity, sandy to silty CLAY with common greenish silty cl~ystone fragments. 6-9' Cobble size asphalt fragments within medium chocolate brown sitly CLAY,moist. .Note: i6' Irregular brown sandy silt seam with some cobbles, loose, slightly moi.st on north side of boring. 9-11 1 ARTIFICIAL FILL/TERRACE (7) -Chocolate brown and red .moist, stiff, sandy CLAY, no obvious porosity, possibly derived from terrace materials. 11-15' BEDROCK -Greenish brown, medium dense, brittle, moist, random fractures with rust-colored infilling (oxide?), silty .CLAYST0NE. Total Depth= 15 Feet Hole Backfilled Plate A-2 I I I I I: :-:.,., I I- I_- ; .. ' I I: L: 1. I ,_. l ~ I .. I. c· I. •: ~ . .:.. l:- 1··: L-' I':. l·LT I.: L'.: 1-, I:. 'GG7oJofi: T;.c. ~~:-~! &~ Project: Larw1n-Rosedale BORING LOG Boring B-3 W. 0. 989-SD Sheet 1 of 1 Carl sb_ad · Research Center -Sample . .µ . 11-1 .µ -11-1 VO ......... ;.e: UHi.i Ill .µ ~ r2B --~ 0.. ,..., Q) ::s ;SE ,..., Cl i:o. i:o .. - -~ 5 ·- 5- ., X rx 4 -. ; - 10- - -z 8 - - 15· . . . - 20· . - -. 25· - - ·- . 30· . .µ ::: .µ Q) ·r-1-1--1 ~ s:: 11-1 ::s-0 pt) .µ dP ~~ 0.. Ul- >,-•r-1 Cl) >, 1--1 0 p Cl) . Cl -~ CL 120.0 11.5 . i 117.5-13.8 104.5 20.0 Date Excavated 2-25-89 ------- Sample Method: Same as B-1 Description of Material -0-4' ARTIFICIAL FILL -Multi-colored, moist, medium stiff, no visible porosity, sandy to silty CLAY with common greenish silty claystone fragments. -4-6' Alternating sandy CLAY/silty SANO, multi-colored, moist, stiff to medium stiff, common claystone fragments. 6-7' ARTIFICIAL Fill/TOPSOIL(?) -Medium brown, stiff, moist, non-porous, silty CLAY with cornmon_green silty CU\YSrONE fragments, possibly derived from topsoil. 7-9' Chocolate brown, sandy CLAY, moist, stiff, possibly • derived from topsoil • 9-10-ARTIFICIAL FILL/TERRACE(?) -Brown clay grades down to mottled brown-reddish brown, silty SAND, medium dense, no obvious structure, moist. possibly derived from terrace materials. 10-12' Mottled brown-yellow brown gravelly silty .SAND, slightly · moist, medium dense, abrupt lower contact. 12-17' BEDROCK -Greenish brown, medium dense, brittle, moist, random fractures with rust-colored infilling (oxide?), silty .CLAYSTONE. Note: Loose pockets of lag at 11' {friable, rounded and angular cobbles}.rests on undulating surface oxide crusts on gravel. Total Depth= 17 Feet Hole Batkfi lled Plate A-3 I I- I I I. I- I I I· ,. I I· :-, . I l I·· I I';, :.-:_: I.: ' . I· ,,~· BORING.LOG Project: Larwin-Rosedale Boring B-4 W. 0. 989-SD Sheet 1 of 1 -Sample . .µ . 4-l .µ . -4-l l'O ........ .c: cna, . ti) .µ ~ ~ ~ 0.. .-I· 0 Q) ::i. §fl ,-j Q i:Q· IXl - - -rz· 10 - 5- - - - - - - - - 15- . . . - 20- - - - .; 25- - - - - 30- Carlsbad Research Center . .µ . ~ .µ ·r-1-,-j i:: 4-l 0 ::> CJ -~-§ 0.. >t-- Cl) >t 1-1 ::> Cl) Q SC 128.6* I 122.s* Q) l,,t :::i-.µ dP Ul- •,;l 0 ~ 5.7 ~-.6. Date Excavated 2-15-89 ------- Sample Method: Same as B-1 Description of Material 0-1' ARTIFICIAL FILL -Greenish, silty CLAY, loose, crumbly, moist. 1-3' TERRACE MATERIALS(?) -Brown, 110ist, stiff, gravelly, sandy CLAY, occasional sandy lenses and gray clays. 3-6.5' Mottled, SANDS and CLAYS, slightly moist, relict dry rootlets. 6-8 1: Light to medium brown pebbly silty SAND, slightly moist, loose to medium dense., rounded/flat pebbles. @8' Undulating contact. ·8-14' BEDROCK -Greenish brown, medium dense, brittle, moist, random·fractures with rust-colored infilling (oxide?), silty ·CLAYST0NE. Total Depth= 14 Feet Hole Backfilled *High dry unit weights may reflect cobbles in samples • Plate A-4 I I I· I- I I: 1-, I. (.-,. l'. I: I I· . ·' ,·, I· I:: ' ' ._ . ._· Project: -Sample . . .µ . ~ .µ -11-l . I "O ' .c Cl)Q) II) .µ ~ as ~ Oi . ..-I 0 Q) ::3 sE ..-1 q a:l· a:l - ., ~ 10 - - 5- -. ·- ~ - 10- - - - - 15· . - - - 20· - - - - 25- - - - - 30· ,, BORING LOG Larwin-Rosedale Carls~ad Research Center Boring B-5 W.O. 989-SD Sheet 1 of 1 . -· ~ .µ ·.-f- ..-1 ~ 11-l 0 0 t) ti) ~ ·u ti) ~ 0. ~--1-l Otll 0 109.6 Q) 1-l ='·-.µ c:IP Ill- •,-f .0 ~ 25.0 ·o-o.s• Date Excavated 2-15-89 Sample Method: Same as B-1 Description of Material ARTIFICIAL FILL -Green to mottled green-light red brown sandy CLAY/clayey SAND, porous, loose to stiff, moist. 0.51-4 1 BEDROCK -Mottled green and red brown, co111non localized oxide staining along fractures and disseminated crusts, highly fractured (-2' ±), abundant pressure faces, silty CLAYSTONE. 4-10' Gradational color change to gray highly fractured with abundant pressure faces. oxidized, moist, silty CLAYSTONE, locally brittle to stiff. @6' N35SE/19SE -Apparent bedding. @5 1 N60W/l~SW Apparent bedding. Total Depth= 10 Feet Hole Backfilled Plate A-5 ---- I- I I· I· I: l I· !"·. I I. 1- , ... ,~- ::::·_~ 1·.:: I·:: .. ~ 1·. -. .µ 11,-1 - .C:. .µ ~ Q) 0 - - - - 5..: - -- ·- - 10- - - - - 15· . . . . 20· - . . - 25· -. . . 30· BORING LOG P.roject: .Larwin-Rosedale Boring B-6 _....:;_.;..._ W. 0. 989-SD Sheet 1 of 1 Sample . .µ 11,-1 ·, rd . ' Ul 0.l. Ul ;; r-l..Q ~ -'OJ.( 0 ::s ~:::, ~ . ·IX! :::>,.i.J. IX! ~-5 Carlsbad Research Center . .µ ~ .µ .,-1_ ~ 1:::4-J 0 ::> t) ~i ~ ::>t- Cfl ::>t 1-l p Cfl 0 117 .3 Q) 1-l ::s ..... .µ dP oo-. ,•,-j 0 ~ 12.5 Date Excavated 2-25-89 ------- Sample Method: Same as B-1 Description of Material · 0-6' BEDROCK -Green gray to light brown discontinuous zones of stiff, moist, silty CLA YSTONE and medium dense moist silty SANDSTONE., composes irregular shaped zones and occasionally becomes red brown in· color. 6-lO'Mottl~d green, orange brown, moist, stiff fractures CLAYSTONE. Total Depth= 10.feet Hole Backfilled Plate A-7 ----- I· I·. I I I:: 1.: I. I, I· \'. I:: ' I· 1:- :., .. I- I·: t2 I.'. I:_ •. • .,p,;~~ ...... 4/Jf_-:; ,.I:' 'if . .,,~·.~' BORING LOG . ... " ..... - _GeoSoil~~ lne. ~-~ .-., ... : \1 ___ , .':.:. :·.: j, w.o. 989-SD ~....I}, Project: Larwin-Rosedale Boring B-7 Sheet 1 of 1 Carlsbad Research Center Date Excavated 2-15-89 . -Sample .j.J Sample Method: same as B-1 • ::: +' . I+-! .j.J .j.J Q) -I.I-I •,-f.-H I re, ' r-1 s:: I.I-I ::s-.c: U).Q) . ti) 0 0 C) .j.J dP +I ~ r"i.Q ~ Cl)~ 0., ti)- 0., r-1 '0~ u .>i--...i Q) . ::, sE . r-1 Cl) >i H 0 Description of Material 0 ~ ~ Otr.l 0 ~ -0-5 1 BEDROCK -Green/gray, stiff to very stiff, moist, fractured (with oxide stains along fractures) silty to sandy CLAYSTONE. - - - 5-. Tot~ 1 Depth= 5 .Feet -Hole Backfilled ' "'. - - 10- - - - . 15- - - - - 20- - - - - 25- - - - -Plate A-8 30- I I- I- -1_ : .. 1- -- I- I ,'' I 1-- \'-. I I . \. -· 1-. ' 1-,_ .. I I·: -·~. -..·:-...· I,, . :"· •::.... 1, ·..:-. Project: -Sample . .µ ·-1M . .µ -~ I 'ti ' .c: 0,(1) 00 .µ .!Ii::· '2B ~ a. i-1 0 cv· ::s sB r-1 0 al-al - - - -- 5- -~ 6 - - - 10· - - -. 15· . - - - '' 20· - - - - 25- - - - - 30· BORING LOG Larwfn-Rosedale Carlsbad· Research Center Boring B-8 w.o. 989-SD Sheet l of l • .µ ~ .µ CV ·,-j-.I-! r-1 i::: ~ ::s-0 p C) .µ dP ~i-a. oo->t-•,-j Cfl >t 1-l 0 :::> Cfl -0 ::E:: 103.8 25.2 Date Excavated 2-15-89 Sample Method: Same as B-1 Description of Material 0-1.5 ARTIFICIAL FILL -Lime green multi-colored sandy CLAY with abundant rock fragments, abrupt cut. l.5-10' BEDROCK -Mottled yellow brown, green yellow and re~ brown stiff, moist, silty to sandy CLAYST0NE, co111110n heavily stained zones of irregular shapes and abrupt contacts. @5 1 Becomes less mottled. Tota·1 Depth= 10 Feet Hole Backfilled Plate A-9 ------- I I l I I,: 1. I. I: ' . , .. I·' l. I. : _:, I. I'~-,_~~'! I_;: I· t ••• • . G.folofi;; f;.e. ~~~;;~·· ~. J!!i..~- Proj ect: Larwin.,.Rosedale . Carlsbad Research Center -Sample . .µ li-l ..c:: +J. 0, Q) 0 - - - - 5- - ·- - . 10· . . . . . 15· . . -· . . 20· . . - - 25- . . . - 30- l''O U)Q) ~ r-i;Q ,-1 rti~ ::s sE l!l BORING LOG Boring B-9 W.O. 989-SD Sheet 1 of 1 Date Excavated 2-15-89 Sample Method: Same as B-1 Description of Material BEDROCK (0-5') -Brown/green, very moist, stiff, massive sandy CLAYSTONE. @2.5' Becomes slight moist, .massive and fractured with minor oxide staining or fracture surfaces. Total Depth= 5 Feet Hole Backfilled Plate · A-lo I- I· I- I- I'.. ·,, I ... I I: :·.· '· I I 1-: 1.· I-' I. I:; I·:: :_:·. I:· .. ,. ~1£?; BORING LOG Geo _·o_ -1-~; jae . . ~~; ~t ·:-_ w.o. 989-SD ·Project: Larwin-Rosedale Boring 8-10 Sheet 1 of 1 Carlsbad Research Center ; pate Excavated 2-15-89 . -Sample +I Sample Method: Same as 8-1 ' . ~ +I • 4-1 .µ +I Q) -4-1 ·r-1-1-1 . l''O ' ,-f 1::4-1 ::s-.c Ill Cl) (/) 0 0 t) +I di' +I ~ ~ ~ -oo~ >,£' oo- 0.. r-1 CJ . •r-1 Q) ::, s:::s ,-f Cf) >, 1-1 0 Description of Material 0 CQ ::,..u CQ 0 Cl) Q ~ -o-s·• BEDROCK_. Blue green with oxide mottling along fractures and as disseminated zones. slightly moist. stiff. fractu~es. rx IX 8 111.6 18.7 silty CLAYSTONE. .. - 5- -Total Depth= 5 Feet Hole Backfilled - .. -I - io- - - . • 15- - - - - 20- -.. - - 25- . - . -Plate A-11 30- I I I I I. I ' . 1- l 1-I • 1. i. I 1~ BORING LOG w.o. 989-SD ----- Project: Larwin-Rosedale Boring B-11 Sheet 1 of 1 -Sample . .µ . \i-1 ' .µ -11-1 l'O ., .c: (llQ) Ul .µ ~-.ri.O ~ ~ ...; rg~ Q) :, ,-1 .. Q IXI ::w . IXI -- - - - 5- - - - - 10- - - - - 15· . . . . 20· .. . . - 25· . . . . 30· Carlsbad Research Center ·• .µ ~ .µ ·r-1-...; S:::4-1 0 ::>t> ~i ~ >i- ti) :>t j..j t:)tl) Q SM 'St Q) j..j ·::s-.µ dP UJ- •r-1 -0 ~ . . Date Excavated 2-15-89 Sample Method: Same as B-1 ·oescription of Material 0-2' FILL -Light yellow green, multi-colored, moist, non-porous, stiff mixture of green silty, sandy CLAY and brown sandy CLAY, . with few pebbles and claystone fragments. 2-10' BEDROCK -Green -brown, mottled orange brown, moist, stiff, fractured silty CLAYST0NE, discontinuous thin zones of clayey silty, oxide staining along randomly oriented fractures. Total Depth= 10 Feet Hole Backfilled Plate A-12 I' I. ,, I I 1-: I'. I I I I l II ' ' I I 1: 1- ·I- I- I: I· -·· I~ ... Moisture-Density APPENDIX II LABORATORY TESTING The field moisture content -and d:ry unit weight were determined for each. of the undisturbed soil samples. The information is useful in providing a general representation of the soil consistency between borings, and local variations. The dry unit weight was determined in pounds per cubic foot and is shown. on ·the Boring Logs. The field moisture content was .determined as a percentage of the dry weight. The laboratory maximum dry density and optimum moisture content for each of the major soil types was determined according to test method ASTM D-1557-78. The following table presents the results: Location Soil Type Maximum dry Density (bcfl B-2@ 6' Reddish brown, sandy CLAY B-1@ 7 1 Light grayish brown, silty CLAY Consolidation . 119. 0 99.0 Optimum Moisture% 14.5 23.0 Settlement predictions of the soil's behavior under load are made on t~e basis of consolidation tests. The consolidation apparatus is designed to receive one Q't the one-inch rings. Loads are applied in several increments in a geometric progression, and the resulting deformations recorded at selected time intervals. Porous stones are placed in contact wi-th the top and bottom of GeoSoils, Inc. I ,, I I I: :,. I. I I I- C I r· ' 1 .. - 1. '~·-. Ii ''-,_ 1-., .. I I:: ·:. ·. ~ ,_-. I·-. -. 1-.- L·-::· ,. " I.AR.WIN-ROSEDALE PROPERTIES W.O. 989-SD LABORATORY TESTING PAGE 2 MARCH 13, 1989 each specimen to permit addition and release of pore fluid. samples are generally tested at increased moisture content to determine the effect of water contacting the bearing soil. The normal load at which the water was added is noted on the drawing. Results are· plotted on the Consolidation-Pressure curve, Plate c- l. Expansive So.:i.ls Expansive soil conditions have been evaluated for the site. Representative samples of t~e soils near proposed pad grade were recovered for classification and expansion testing. Swell tests _were performed on ".relatively undisturbed" samples in brass rings having an inside diameter of 2. 365 inches and a height of 1.0 inches. Sixty psf surcharge loads were applied to two rings of each sample, where one was submerged in water for 24 hours and one was air dried for up to 72(±) hours. The combined vertical swell and shrinkage was recorded as a percentage o.f the origina_l sample height. The test results ranged from 6 • 7 percent to 8. 8 percent, which is considered moderately to highly ~xpansive. An expansion index test was al.so performed on a representative sample of bedrock from Boring B-7 at 3 1 • Testing was performed Geo-Soils, In,:. ,. I I I .. · ,. : ,, I ,. I ' ,,_ ' ' I I I i· I: t..: ,,; L~; I , .. 'I;. ;:_. , .. . ·. u-· II: ... , _ .. 1-. ::~-~ LARWIN-ROSEDALE PROPERTIES W.O. 989-SD LABORATORY TESTING PAGE 3 . MARCH 13, 1989 in accordance with Stand~rd 298-2 of the Uniform Building Code. The·test result was an ~xpa-nsi6n index of 113. Based on this test results, representative bedrock materials are highly expansive. GeoSoils, lne. I\ ,,.-~ ,, I ,, ,, ' I I I. I I ,,_ '. ,,. I •~ ' -- :I-- ,_._ . ,: / .. ' I ... ··-·. 1: " .• I ., " "' APPENDIX III GRAPING ~UI-DLINES GeoS9ils, Inc. I I, I I . ~·-. ,:_ ~ ,: I I I \ . ._ I \ I ' l • 'I '. ., t .. I\ Ii_ :I'. : : \., .. • ,. , __ . I· 1:- L. ~- I· . . , - .. .... GRADING GUIDELINES _Grading should be performed to at least the minimum requirements of the governing agencies, Chapter 70 of the Uniform Building Code and the guidelines presented below: Site Clearing ' ' Trees, dense vegetation, and other deleterious materials should be removed from the -site. Non-organic debris or concrete may be placed in deeper fill areas under direction of the Soil Engineer. Light, dry grasses may be thinly scattered and incorporated into the fill under direction of the Soils Engineer, provided concentrations ·of organics are not developed. Subdrainage 1. Subdra!nage systems should be provided in all canyon bottoms and within buttress and stabilization fills prior to placing fill. Subdrains should conform to schematic diagrams GS-1, GS-3, and GS-4, approved . by the Soils Engineer. For canyon subdrains, runs less than 500 feet may use six inch pipe. Runs in excess of 500 feet should have the lower end as eight inch minimum. 2. Filter material should be Class ·2 permeable filter material per California Department of Transportation standards tested by the Soil Engineer to verify its suitability. A sample of the material should be provided Ge()Soils, Inc . ,, I , .. !I ., I: L .. I l. I·, [:'. 1. I. [. I· ! 1:- _, .. I ~ ,: ~ ' I-~-- I. t···' " 'LARWIN--ROSEDALE W.O. 989-SD MARCH 13, 1989 GRADING GUIDELINES PAGE 2 to the Soil Engineer by the contractor at least two working days before it is delivered to the site. The filter should be clean with a wide range of sizes. As an alternative to the Class 2 filter, the material may be a 50/50 mix of pea gravel and clean concrete sand whiph is well .mixed, or clean gravel wrapped in a suitable filter fabric. 3. An exact delineat;'ion o.f anticipated subdrain locations may be determined at 40 scale plan review stage. During grading,the Engineering Geologist should evaluate the necessity of placing additional drains. 4. All subdrainage systems should be observed -by the Engineering Geologist and Soils Engineer during construction and prior to covering with compacted fill. 5. Consideration should be given to having subdrains located by the project surveyors. outlets· should be located and protected. Treatment of Existing Ground 1. All heavy vegetation, rubbish and other deleterious materials $hould be disposed of off site. GeoSoils, Inc~ 1 .. . ,,,_ I:· t . I··· ' I ' L-'·· ! 1. I. L·· I. l .. 1- l. I~, e:· ,~, I. , .. ' I. '. I. ' ' I ' . 1 L .. - 1 L_ rl LARWIN-ROSEDALE W.O. 989-SD MARCH 13, 1989 GRADING GUIDELINES PAGE 3 2. All surficial deposits of alluvium and colluvium should be removed (see Plate GS~l) unless otherwise indicated in the text of . thiE? report. Groundwater existing in the alluvial areas may ·make excavation difficult. Deeper removals than indicated in the text of the report·may be neces.sary due to saturation during winter months. 3. Subsequent to removals, the .natural ground should be processed to a depth of six inches, moistened to n.ear optimum moisture conditions and compacted to fill· standards. Fill Placement 1. All site soil and bedrock may be reused for compacted fill; however, some special.processing or handling may be required (see report). 2. Material used in the compacting process should be evenly spread, ·moisture.conditioned, processed, and compacted in thin lifts not to exceed six inches in thickness to obtain a uniformly dense layer. The fill should be placed and compacted on a horizontal plane, unless c:;:,therwise found acceptable by the Soil Engineer . GeoSoils, lne. I 1. I ,- t/ 1. ' . I -· I. I I I. I· I. .,-, ~. I • .. I I; .... I: ,, .,_ LARWIN-ROSEDALE W.O. 989-SD GRADING GUIDELINES PAGE 4 MARCH 13, 1989 :3. If the mo:isture content or relative density varies from that acceptable to the Soil -Engineer, the Contractor should rework the fil1--until it is in accordance with the following: a) Moisture content of the fill should be at or above opt im'um moistur$. Moisture should be evenly distributed without wet;. and dry pockets. Pre-watering .of cut or removal_ areas should be considered in addition to watering during fill placement, particularly in, clay or dry surficial soiis. b) Each six inch layer should be compacted to at least 90 percent of the maximum density in compliance with the testing method specified by the controlling governmental agency. In this case, the testing method is ASTM Test Designation D-1557-78. 4. Side-hill fills should have an equipment-width key at their toe excavated. through all surficial soil and into competent material and tilted back 1nto the hill (GS-2, GS-6). As the fill is elevated, it shoulq be benched through surficial soil and slopewash, and into competent bedrock or other material deemed suitable by the Soil Engineer. GeoSoils, In(!. I I. .· . , .. ·-· I ····· I: :-:: ~:,,t· .,-. ' . I. I 1, 1. l -' I , .. L I-- I·. I. ~ -. ' t::.:...• 1-.:· ~·-~ 1,., -t~~· I :·.: .. .. .<. LARWIN-ROSEDALE W.-0. 989~SD MARCH 13, 1989 GRADING GUIDELINES ·PAGE 5 5. Rock fragments. less than eight inches in diameter may be utilized in the fill, provided: a) They are not placed in concentrated pockets; b) There is a sufficient percentage of fine-grained material to surround the rocks; c) The dj,stribution of the rocks is supervised by the Soil Engineer. 6. Rocks greater than eight -inches in diameter should be taken off ~ite, or placed in accordance with the recommendations of the Soil Engineer in areas designated as suitable for rock disposal (See GS-5). 7. Iri· clay soil large chunks or blocks are common; if in excess 8. of eight (8) inches minimum dimension then they are considered as oversized. Sheepsfoot compactors or other suitable methods should be used to break the up blocks. The Contractor should be required to obtain a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent out to the finished slope face of fill slopes .• This may be achieved by either overbuilding the .slope and cutting back to the compacted core, or by direct compaction of the slope face with suitable equipment. GeoSe~ls, lne~ I I I 1· 1 • I I I ' I I ' -1: I I. '· I .1:. ,--;: I:. l.:.. I~, ·, t.:>. 1-. !:_: 1-. .,. LARWIN-ROSEDALE .W.O. 989-SD MARCH 13, 1989 GRADING GUIDELINES PAGE 6 If fill slopes are built "at grade" using direct compaction methods then the slope construction should_ be performed so that a constant gradient i~ maintained throughout construction. Soil should not be "spilled" over the slope face nor shoul.d slopes be "pushed out" to obtain grades. · Compaction equipment Should compact each lift along the immediate top of slope. Slopes should be back rolled rolled approximately every 4 feet vertically as the slope is built. Density tests should be taken periodically during grading on the flat surface of the f;ill three to five feet horizontally .from the face of. the slope. In addition, if a method other than over building and cutting back to the compacted. core is to be employed, slope compaction testing during construction should include testing the .outer six inches to three feet in the slope face to determine if the required compaction is being achieved. Finish grade testing of the slope should be performed after construction is complete. Each day the Contractor should receive a copy 0£ the Soil Engineer's "Daily Field Engineering Report" which wQuld indicate the results of field density tests that day. 9. Fill over cut slopes should be constructed in the following GeoSoils, lne. ,. I I I .:.· ' I I I '·. I I. '. I ,. \, I: I. I- ·:.. t-_ , .. ~- Ir~ I:: LARWIN-ROSEDA.LE W.O. 989--SD MARCH 13, 19_89 GRADING GUIDELINES PAGE 7 manner: a) All surficial soils and weathered rock materials should be removed at the cut-fill interface. 'b) c) A key at least 1 equipment width wide and tipped at least l foot into slope should be excavated into competent materials and observed by the soils engineer or his representative. The c~t portion of the slope should be constructed prior to fill placement to evaluate if stabilization is necessary, the contractor should be responsible for any addi tion,al earthwork created by placing fill prior to cut excavation. 10. Transition lots (cut and_ fill) and lots above stabilization fills should be capped with a three foot thick compacted fill blanket. iJ.. Cut pads should·be observed by the Engineering Geologist . . to evaluate the need for overexcavation and replacement with 1:ill. This may p~ neces~ary to reduce water infiltration into highly fractured bedrock or other permeable zones,and/or due to differing expansive potential of materials beneath a structure. The GeoS.oils, Ine. I I 1, 1: \"•• 1.---.:_ I I 1· I I:._ I I I· ,: ,~ I .. I.·:· I·_ .- 2.. ,, .. ,~ , ..... , .. LARWIN-ROSEDALE W.O. 989-SD MARCH 13, 1989 GRADING GUIDELINES PAGE 8 overexcavation should be at least three feet. overexcavation may be recommended in some cases. Deeper 12. Exploratory backhoe or dozer trenches still remaining after site removal should be excavated and filled with compacted fill if they can be located. Grading Observation and Testing 1. Observation of the fill placement should be provided by the soil Engineer during the progress of grading.- 2. In general, density tests would be made at intervals not exceeding two feet of fill height or every 1, ooo cubic yards of fill placed. This criteria will vary depending on soil conditions and the size of the fill. In any event, an adequate number of field density tests should be made to evaluate if the required compaction and moisture content is generally being obtained. 3. · Density tests 3'\ay be made on the surface material to receive fill, as requi~ed by the Soil Engineer. 4. Cleanouts, processed g~ound to receive fill, key ~xcavations,subdrains and rock disposal should be observed by the Soil Engineer prior to placing any fill. It will be the Contractor's responsibility to notify the GeoSoils, In~. I I- I 1. ,_. I- I 1 .. .I: I: ,. I'' I· I- I I ,·. ". I. ,. ;n• , ... 1-.. _;-:. .:..:..,. 1-, 1-: ': .. LARWIN-ROSEDALE W.O. 989-SD GRADING GUIDELINES PAGE 9 MARCH 13, 1989 Soil Engineer when such areas are ready for observation. 5. An Eng.ineering Geologist should · observe subdrain construction. 6. An. Engineering Geologist should observe benching prior to and during placement of fill. Utility Trench Backfill Utility trench backfill should be _placed to the following standards: 1. Ninety percent of the· laboratory standard if native material is used as backfill. 2. As an alternative, -clean sand may be utilized and flooded into place. No· specific relative compaction would be required; however, observation, probing, and if deemed necessary, testing may be required. 3. Exterior trenches, paralleling a footing and extending below a 1: 1 plane projected from the outside bottom edge of the footing, should be compacted to 90 percent of the GeoSoilJ, lne. I I- I I. -~. I, I I ' 1-,_ ·-- 1· I I- I. I I-: ,_: ,.:: I: LARWIN-ROSEDALE W.O. 989-Sb. -GRADING GUIDELINES PAGE 10 MARCH 13, 1989 laboratory i:.tandard. Sand backfill, until it is similar to . the inplace fill, should not be allowed in these trench backfill -areas·. Density testing along with probing should be accomplished to verify the desired resui ts .. GeoSoils, In.~~ I I I . - I I I. 1-- ~ .·. I· I ,_;. I •: \ I-\ : .I. t .. ,., '. \'. ,._ :.:. I;· 1·· ..... : I,: .-. ·· ... I:: C 1~ '· \•., .. Suitable Materia{ Bench· where slope -exceeds 5: I F"inol Grade·" .:· ~·1• .:;.v. ~~= \Subdrain · Suitable Material (See Plate GS-3) TYPICAL TREATMENT Of: NATURAL GROUND Soil Mechanics • Geology • Foundation Engineering PLATE GS-f I I I ,, ._.L• I I· I ,.• I_ :- I, ' : ·1, ,, '. I_ : •, ' ,. l ' 1- ~--,;,, :-· '·'; ~-;L: 1.- l .. : I-: ;. : .,..i-...:; 1-. j", '--' I: t: .. _ ;: . .. TOE SHOWN ON GRA.OING P.LAN -----------,,,, . .,.,.,,,..-1----;--,: .,,,.. .,,,,-' . PROJECTED I ~t •-I .,,,, .,,,,,., C(•e9 .,,,.. .,., ' 4 1 ' .,, .,,,, t Typica .,,, .,,, 0 ( .,,, .,., 'J:__ .,, .,,,, . \ \) fC\ ' .,,,,,. -\\\)" ,.t'-----------J ~.,,,..,. . \ co _,,..,,,,,. p / -/ / ... / ~-/ -' 0\ ' ' I ' ' .._ I ,.. ~o9~ .,,, .,,,,,. . 10' Typico I 1 / . , ..,,, .,, , / -',. ,. .,,,, / . . .,,,, _,,,. \ ,.,.. .I_ ,I .,,..I;,_ I_ I_ I_ I_ l_ I..._ I -/, I _ 2' I' / ' / '-I I '-I I ' I / /I..,_ I' MinimumtE---15' Minimum----~ BEDROCK OR FIRM FORMATION MATERIAL Note: Where natural slope oradient is 51 1 or less, benchino is not necessary unless stripping did not remo-ve all compressible material. TYPICAL FILL OVER NATURAL SLOPE Soil Mechanics • Geology • Foundation·Engineering ....... ,,. ... ,.. ,."' ..... I l·~·- ·I I I, I I. I. I. I. J. l , .. ' I~ ;· \ I- I_: , .. I · 1" ~·-.· I;, ... A,LTERN ATE I SOIL-SLOPEWASH ·I ALLUVIUM REMOVED 1·0 ·BEDROCK . ,.- • •,,,.,,,. I •/ 1-. :,..,, I .., ... ., .,,,.,,,. 1--, .... • _,,,,, I -I -~,,-,, ..... ,-- Canyon subdrain.1 &· perforated pipe.with 9 cu. ft. g~avel«per ft. of drain. ALTERNATE -2 .:. , I I /...,_" ~ . . .,,,,, .. ;,,,,,--, -. _,,;,, - . •......---4!-I--I . ·--. / I_ -I ,_ ' 6• perforated pipe· with 9 cu. ft. gravel *' per ft. of drain IE grave I to conform to State of Calif.· Dept. of Public Works standard specifications for Class 2 permeable m:aterial. i .. CANYON SUBDRAIN DESI. GN AND CONSTRUCTION · .-:: ·:· -Soil.~-echanics .. ~:Geol~gy~~Fou~datjoningin~ering - . .. .. . : . . . . ! .. .. .. -: :-: .. . -; • ,. PLATE GR-S 1. 1: .. •, I: I. ~: ·1-: ,, 1· ' . I- I._· I. . ! ~ I. I· " '· I- ' .· i: .... , .. ,·_ :... ~ .. 1--t .. : I: ,: ~,~- L:-, I·:: :·. ! I '· ~ ;'.: .,: t?..} 1-:. ~ .. '· . FINISHED SURFACE A. Buttress slope to hove a bench at every 20 to ~o feet. B. Buttress key depth varies. (see preliminary reports) C. -Buttress· key width varies. (see prel'iminary -repo·rts) o. Backdroins and lateral ~rains located at elevation of every b e·n ch d r a i n. Fi r s·t d r a i n at elevation just above lower lot orad·e. Additional drains m.ay be required at discretion of GeoSoi Is, I n.c. . . -- 36• THICK 2o/ • .._. . • • • • -- 4 • perforot ed pip·e - (or approved equivalent) placed in I cu. ft. per linear ft. of oroded • filter material.• • • Pipe to extend • • ' . f u II I enoth of • buttress.--~~ .. • • • • • • 4" nonperforated pipe lateral to. : Pipe 1• - slope face at. ...-above -- 100' intervo Is ' bench . . . . . ---.- I ./ .., ,I I' ---,,-, ... ,I',' ,_ *Graded filter material to conform to State of Calif. Dept. Public Works standard s~ecifications for.Closs 2 permeable moter•ol TYPICAL BUTTRESS SECTION DATE 3/&g W.O. NO 989-50 BY 65 / Soil Mechanics • Geology • Foundation Engineering .. I 1. 1: 1. I: I-.· I. .. I -I. L I: ' l." I 'i·. I·_ !.. - I:-_ , ; ·I.'.; , . ...-:.._ I:. : -, .. I.· -. j •• • ' ·- Fill SLOPE CLEAR Stock bou l·d e rs end to end. Do not pile upon each other.- Soil sha fl be ~ushed over rocks -and flooded into voids. Compact around and over each windrow. -1 O' Typical · · --:-----<)--~-o--..., SLOPE 1gg!r rows , o O O O -,,.,,.__ 15-' t ____ 3• minimum + '~inimum ~~o~ D Q O O &, , I '---=--:""'--~16' Mlri.-+I , -/ t· I I , I , , , , , 1 ., ,-, , ,, ' -1 1 FIRM GROUND/ -~,,,, / ,,,,, ,, 1 ,,," / 1/ ' ' ' .... ., ' .... ' ' ' -, . , -ROCK DISPOSAL DETAIL DATE Soil Mechanics • Geology • Foundati~n Engineering PLATE GS-5 I I I: I I, !_ : I 1 . I , .. ,. I· I I • '. .. I· t· .. I· 1.-. ,. l· . I· I. 1 ... , ... I.·, ! ... 1~; f ·:·· I ..... .. L .. , .. ,..:,.;;, I·· t::~ ,I\_•' . REMOVE ALL TOPSOIL, COLLUV'IUM AND CREEP MATERl·AL FROM TRANSITION. FILL BEDROCK OR Fl RM FORMATION MATERIAL TYPICAL Fl LL OVER CUT· SLOPE DATE W.O. NO 9&t; ... 50 BY h51 Soil Mechanics • Geology • Foundation Engineering C>I A Tr= r.~ -a '· A:!) COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL APPLICATlON fORM fOR INDUSTRIAL WASTE DISCHARGE PERMIT CITY OF CARLSBAD APPLICATION: NEW -------BUILDING P.C. NO.: '1 /-I~ 77 <: (CHECK ONE) REVISED ';4 Signature of City Representative APPLICATION No.:(~# 577-) 923 INDUSTRIAL CLASS: -----DATE: 12.·2.4·9( APPLICATION fOR INDUSTRIAL WASTE DISCHARGE PERMIT A. GENERAL: ~!CANT: C~l c) vJ ·...;;..~~~i.:;.;.+-.-~~ ...... --....,..-~ ~_;.))f BUSINESS: t> ~L rcANT, s ADDREss =~2-::::.:3::::::.:.!4~s~~~!:!:'.....:~~4--~~+-==c::::::bff:::!.!..L.:~~='4--1,-!a& B. WASTES AND PROCESSING: ffJ Domestic Waste Only (Check where applicable) 1-1 Industrial Waste 1-1 Industrial Waste NOT -Discharged to Sewer -Discharged to Sewer GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WASTE (Chemical and Physical Characteristics of proposed waste): _______________________ _ APh,,{1r:t. '* ¾-:::,--w~.~.-cu,c, e .. s£f, .e · _ tf ~et c A A.I op"' 0 t~/1.._ TlfvU~ fe-o~ 1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROCESS ( If Applicable): __________ _ C. WASTES TO BE DISCHARGED TO SEWER: WASTE: (Check One) TREATED: UNTREAT..,.ED_:_?&e __ QUANTITY: AVERAGE ____ GPO (Daily) MAXIMUM ____ _. GPO (Gallons Pe~ Day) .. "' City of Carlsbad c,.,,,..,.,.;ocw•t®At·J·i,eiAOI INDUSTRIAL WASTE· PERMIT You are applying for a building permit that requires an Industrial Waste Application per City Sewer Ordinance 13. 16. The attached application should be completed and returned to the Development Processing Services Division as soon as possible. This permit will be reviewed and forwarded to the Encina Water Pollution Control facility or San Diego County Department of Public Works for investigation of capacity and usage. · If this is not returned before planchecking is completed, your building permit could be delayed. 2075 Las Palmas Drive•Carlsbad, California 92009-4859•(619) 438-1161 I . , re: "·· ,\, ~ b//~5 RC-v--fiv.v/t~d Rd ~~UTHERFOR'!'D-.-!!!'R!!!'D-. -""""!_9~1~-:-1~3~7'LJ _,_,. Tl q 1-1!.l 'is'.,?::l ... I . . -. . •. . 8t.D&; :l-185'" Ru.THi;;RFo,e.o Ro. ii 1-13?7 , ,~11111 ~ \ - /o f-i-)q, R..T I A--F~~~ C,i;,<Lr;'.._ . , -4 fL,J& f Pr-f2-\L.'~l ~D/b.o, N -. ,-r::::t~~~S:?2:J'Bulldin1 Planning ,, • ,;. ,,.. 7 oj;,1 :f?...A · r---+~~:._J Engineering .· 1/V~b ?-~ /r~S Pal & fl!r:,rrr~td~' -==--+4:-_=:-_::~-1~: ~ ~ e:R t7:> t ') u de-tJ't:>r-LJ) (Z t::ff=<--~ ____ ........ __ _J Assoc ,17 M ~1!.... L-C-~~~. ~£..Q... ~ Vt!J,--{:,.(;)P.t?l!'~:-rt~, Q~~E:..e_-W~~ ·,0 f.l? A-t..r\-F.e..r::--It-~ 1 !:, ..-t' be> :trb. ew,H-:J) ,.~ '-/) -. ---~-. \ ... . ~Tl!8 --i L,V l ·"'1"1r" ~-re_ __ l_ ~ ~ ~ "" 'rO To. ,_ · > · cant t0 ~ ~ ' ' ~ r->-..D t-'1 '--\ I<~ 'TO ,...,,,, L-' ~==----.....,;, ~-=--. ~-,/ LL ,· 10 *t"'? , 'N ~~~,, t'-/7 L-.J.o ,---, --------+-,.,,,~.,,~-"l!f-- A I ..,;:/?_ ---J+-E--f2.6., ~~~ ·rv-),~11!!--cf;;,,'VLJ:;r_ --C-0 c...sc <2._p_ ~t' FE.. e:: I 1J£ ,~ J;ll) i ,J C:i-y-1,,,i\--r_ W, \__,.L _ ~'\~ t-.)-~ Ccv ~~C--r-~, _ ,1;1 //~ f!n ~ r,J /t-1-'fl~- ----1-----· I =- _j ,. ,. ,'.• :, ~--... --...... --·-· --··--------. -~. ~ -~ --------..... _ -------·----.... -... -~-------.-~~-_,... . ~ .. _,,. ' ..,_,._ -. . -~ . ',. .,,...., ____ ..,_ , ............... _ .... ~--.. _ .. ----... ·----.......... ,_,...,., .. _ ~ 12,/17/91 08:15 Page 1 of 1 B U I L D I N G Job Address: 2285 RUTHERFORD RD Permit Type: PLAN CHECK REVISION Parcel No: Valuation: 0 P E R M I T Str: Construction Type: NEW Occupancy Group: B2 Description: THREE AREAS Class Code: 91-1377 OF MEZZ REVISED PCR No: Project No: Development No: Fl: Ste: 5628 12/17/91 0001 01 C-PRMT : TO INCREASE STORAGE LOADING' TO 125 LB/SF PCR91082 A9101745 02 208-00 ISSUED 11/08/91 12/17/91 CD FINAL APPROVAL I JNSP. --DATE __ 1 CLEARANCE _____ 1 CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 Jl"'i ' ' ----~ APPUCATION • PLAN CHECK NO. . . City qf Carlsbad Building Departllll!flt 2075 qas Palmas Dr., carlsbad, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 EST. VAL ____________ _ '\ i . . PLAN CK DEPOSIT _______ _ 1. PEriMII 1-YPE VAUD. BY __________ _ DATE A -ajeornrnercial D New Bmldmg U Tenant Improvement B -Dllndustrial D New Building D Tenant Improvement C -D Residential D Apartment D Condo D Single Family Dwelling D Addition/ Alteration D Duplex O Demolition D Relocation D Mobile Horne O Electrical D Plumbing LI-Mechanical D Pool D Spa D Retaining Wall D Solar )(other.,i..;~!U.ol,~,· FOR OFFICE USE ONLY mt o,. C 2 Soils Report STATE ZIP CODE DAY TELEPHONE ZIP CODE DAY TELEPHQNE NAME ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE DAY TEJ:,EPHONE 6 .. CDN1RAciUR NAME ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE DAYTEIEPHONE STATELIC. # LICENSE CI.ASS CITY BUSINESS LIC. # DESIGNER NAME ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE DAY TEIEJ;>HONE STATELIC. # 1. WOR.Kfilt}i' wMPENSAfiON Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby afhrrn that I have a certificate of consent to self-msure issued by the Director of lndustnal Relations, or ·a certificate of Workers' Compensation Insurance by an admitted insurer, or an exact copy or duplicate thereof certified by the Director of the insurer thereof filed with the Building Inspection Department (Section 3800, Lab. C). INSURANCE COMPANY POLICY NO. EXPIRATION DATE · Certificate of Exemption: I certify that m the performance of the work for wfoch this permit 1s issued, I shall not employ any person many manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. SIGNATURE DATE s. oWNRR-Dotmim 0£cl.Alt.ATION 0Wner-Bu1lder becJaratlon: I hereby afhrm that I am exempt from the Contracto?s Llcense Law for the followmg reason: D I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale.). D I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's license Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's license Law). D I am exempt under Section _______ Business and Professions Code for this reason: (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit tq construct, alter, improve, demolish, or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's license Law (Chapter 9, commencing with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars [$5001). SIGNATIJRE DATE coMPEETE IBIS sBcnoN FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL BUlWlNa PERMITS ONLY: Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration.form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? DYES D NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? a YES a NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? 0 YES D NO IF ANY OF nm ANSWERS ARE YES, A FIN!J, CERTIFICATE OF OOCUPANCY MAY Nor BE~ AFl'ER JULY 1, 1989 UNLFSS TIIE APPUCANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING nm REQUIREMENTS OF nm OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND nm AIR POLLUTION CX)N1llOL msnucr. 9. wNSliOCIIDN llNOING AGENCY . I hereby afhrm that there 1s a construction lendmg agency for the performance of the work for which this permit IS issued (Sec 3097(1) C1V1I code). IENDER'S NAME IENDER'S ADDRESS 10. APPJ.JcAN1' CERTlFIQ\11oN I certify that I have read the apphcat1on and state that the above mforrnauon 1s correct. I agree to comply w1m au city ordinances am1 state laws relating to,building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the City of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE ro SAVE INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS nm Cl1Y OF CARLSBAD AGAINSf AIL IJABIIJTIES, JUDGMENTS, CDSTS AND EXPENSES WIIlCH MAY IN ANY WAY ACill.UE AGAINSf SAID Cl1Y IN CDNSEQUENCE OF nm GRANTING OF nns PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for e avations over 5'0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. Expiration. Every pe building or work au such permit is sus ilding Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the rmit is not commenced within 365 d;iys from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by ned at any time after the work is cornrner,ced for a period of 180 days (Section 303(d) Uniform Builh'Code). . DATE: II /~/ 1 WHITE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance :;-r. ESGIL CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) 560-1468 \~ _o\\ JURISDICTION: .,:------" ' C ~ .::,-:q (' v -r \~_6.\_ct _ _j PLAN CHECKER . QFILE COPY 1:UPS c:DESIGNER PLAN CHE~K NO: ( r::::::, C\ 1,_ l;,77 f!?o~~°'kT: :JT P1fo.J.EC1' ~i~mRES S : __.J_......~'---'f/C.-:::1'------''R.=...r ,.:...;\_\..:....;_;. ~:....:..,,_~__,_11c..:...~ ...,.c.....:.::e.d=---·----., j ... ..,, -.,.;.,,zt: ... , -PR()J"EC.T ~,NAME: __ C ..... _ .... CI ____ L\..._tJ,_t.A..._.)b_t_ ..... c_..--..... o..;..I ')--------------- ' •>/-).,if~· ;, .-{The·plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where ~~ecessary and substantially comply with the jurisdictiori's ··~uilding codes. D D 0 0 D The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdictiort's building codes when minor deficien- cies identified-=--~------------are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a comple~e recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corp. until corrected plans are submitted ·for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to return to the applicant contact person. The ap~licant's-copy of the check list has been sent to: II Esgil staff did not advise the applicant contact person that plan check has been completed. O Esgil staff did advise applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: ------------- Date c.ontacted: _________ Telephone # _______ _ D REMARKS: ____________ .,.._~-----,---,-'----------- By: Q_ \ \ "S t\..d,r,e;_ ESGIL CORPORATION)~lf" Enclosures: 11.JC)t\(.. _...::...;;;_-=-------- 0GA DCM , ' ' : I ' .J ESGIL CORPORATION· 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) 560-1468 DATE: Nov -1q _q, LJ APPLICANT JURI SD I CTI ON: L c; o:} (tt v { S bA.. d <:::61,!QRISDICTI~ 0 PLAN CHECKER QFILE COPY PLAN CHECK NO: L:¢ C{l-131] (E«)*SET: C.Z) OUPS ~\DESIGNER _ .... -r-:?...-r--PROJECT ADDRESS: ~e: :8 ~ 11.:.:.UU:ll::( 1P" 4-. PROJECT NAME: ~-tft11-!),.::} C"'lplry D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the .jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply 0 with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficien- D II 0 II . cies identified ____________ are resolved and checked by building department staff. The· plans transmitted-herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corp. until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to return to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Sm '1h 5 0 ;;s~ 9 5i:,. lp 5? :;;:C, C 4 ""'">'"' 'RA . -\t \5 0 I Ill Esgil staff did not advise the applicant contact person that plan check has been completed. O Esgil staff did advise applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: ------------- Date contacted: _________ Telephone# _______ _ · '* II REMARKS: A-re..\... ( ~ Wv('., .C~11. ..... b~s: u""d.u:::s:c;::;:s, "f>(A., ·Lh~-u<-. By: C),, \, 724,d,re. Enclosures:_~"'-'-""'-~-6~n~,:(,.,__ _____ _ ESGIL CORPORATION \\\ \iL 0GA OcM .I tl=-0 "f-y~~00 s~.:. * {j) "t::>ot. Cb q' __ ,~,, ~LJ:)1 '?.:-1 : ~A.Ar(. \\jV\\C\\ ?0 -=ff ~-'-t_......_.._.,~:r-'~-z..:...-.:::..,__..;........o.......,_,,_-<-=:~~r-'"'OL-"'=~=::..:.-~'"--~~~..:..,...i;;;=.:.=---~r1-:=1====- -f/" r--"-i-~=.:...,.,~~~-',;;::'--"~""-"-'-'-.:..;.:.a;;:~:.J.=.=---:==--:....~~~~:::::;::;;;.;-----------1 *"" 1--1,,,,;~p~~o.::..i..=~r~!:::::::l,o~===t:=!:!:::======-=-=---.:::::::!:!a=-----"=~~=----"-i.s...::~==-~..!....-,;~""'-"===:air--i '·~}! • . Prepared bys :::, °'--Q re,.. Jurisdiction LJ,r \~ t:io,.,~ VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE PLAN CHECK NO. L-6 q \ -\377 ,~-t.:/)~ -"1- a Bldg. Dept. s,/Esgil BUILDING ADDRESS .'.:)~-g ~ "'2 ~,,::f),. .. 1c\ ~o . APPLICANT/CONTACT . ~a::,~! Ozs~c~ PHONE NO. W5~ -"c\$'8 BUILDING OCCUPANCY ~-s -DESIGNER PHONE ------ TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION JIC· I \.-l ti-/ .<PtK.. CONTRACTOR PHONE ____ _ BUILDING PORTION -iij ;i;;i;,;g;ni1Q .Q ~iA VALUATION VALUE MULTIPLIER ,;: 0 ye,\,,.. ,, ~\<lX1-~ -~v--s, 'E '.:!,. l }-..f". \Lo~-( t.~~1\ ' c_ V\ "-"'-6..LA ...... .., Air Conditionine Commercial @ .. .. Residential @ Res. or Comm. Fire S"Drinklers @ Total Value Building Permit Fee$ _________________ _.._ ______ _ Plan Check r ee $ $ c2>0J.s0(~ COMMENTS._:--------------------------- SHEET ill_ OF U) )2/87 PLANNING/ENGINEERING APPROVALS p c_j< Cf I -'3 7.------ ~ Z PERMIT NUMBER CS</;-~ DATE ______________ __.. ADDRESS "2--'2---~~ £-nb--£-JL ~ RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL ADDITION MINOR ( < $10,000.00) TENANT IMPROVEMENT PLAZA CAMINO REAL VILLAGE FAIRE COMPLETE OFFICE BUILDING r- OTHER2& -'k}~ <.0'2--. Lo ~.D ~~ ~ ~r,::-f' "lE-ZZ- PLANNER /)f}f)i,o<k(J DATE / /-/J ~ 9'/ ENGINEER ~ c:e ~ DATE ;/~ I 3-Cf/ C :\ WPS 1 \FILES\BLDG .FRM Rev 11/1.5/90 2560 ORION WAY CARLSBAD, C-, _,8 Citp of Cads&ab FIRE DEPARTMENT PAGE1 OF_ I TELEPHONE C. (619) 931-2121 : APPROVED/ PLAN CHECK REPORT DISAPPROVED PLAN CHECK# re O.,. l11-\n_,/ PROJECT C-AL.1.-0uJA.~ G-o<.-f ADDRESS 2,1-~5 ~VTl'\i;rtF>rt~ ARCHITECT Ni:i.~,(. l-~1-..H,r:<11J ADDRESS )~b&' S'"t.rv....,i.,.._ IL..\ PHONa,fi\ "JSt.-'316'(' OWNER LAnw1tJ R,os, Dbq, fa.ve,n..-,,' \ ADDRESS l{,2..S-5 Vt..,.,.1,,r~ llL-vJ PHON{y1i) )¥~-'1~~/t/ OCCUPANCY /\-L-CONST.--ril.:_'"'" __ v~•-J~_k_e~v_lL_TOTALSQ.FT. f2,l,'-1.1o !-°\. STORIES _,)e,.__ ___ _ , ~ SPRINKLERED -gt TENANT IMP ...... 7,-,.....~_Y--'S-'--'-.-'-'F _________ .,--__ .;__ _________ _ APPROVAL·.OF PLANS IS PREDICATED ON CONFORMING TO THE 'FOLLOWING CONDITIONS AND/OR MAKING THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS: PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND PERMITS ....::!_ 1. Provide one copy of: floor plan(s); site plan; sheets ___________________ _ __ 2. Provide two site plans showing the location of all existing fire hydrants within 200 feet of the project. __ 3. Provide specifications for the following: _______________________ _ ~ 4. Permits are required for the installation of all fire protection systems (sprinklers, stand pipes, dry chemical, halon, CO2, alarms, hydrants). Plan must be approved by the fire department prior to installation. --5. The business owner shall complete a building information letter and return it to the fire department. ..L6. _::L_ 7. FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT The following. fire protection systems are required: -Jt 81' Automatic fire sprinklers (Design Criteria: _..,_A,_,,S-__ P-'--6 JL..:::::...----'-'N'--'-F..!f_,!:::.c.:o' _ _,J..,.l....,,,_ __________ _ D Dry Chemical, Halon, CO2 (Location: --------------'----------- 0 Stand Pipes (Type: ------------------------------0 Fire Alarm (Type/Location: ___________________________ _ Fire Extinguisher Requirements: . -gi One 2A rated ABC extinguisher for each {, ci-1 c:'> extinguisher not to exceed 75 feet of travel. -£1 An extinguisher with a minimum rating of ~;...A lb €C..- sq. ft. or portion thereof with a travel distance to the neares-t to be located: C,~ ~ 1(....<i t;\Q.; r;;; ·:, O Other: __________________________________ _ __ 8. Additional fire hydrant(s) shall be provided ______________________ _ EXITS _::/.-9. Exit doors shall be openable from the inside without the use of a key or any special knowledge or effort. _:L_ 10. A sign statin , " This door to remain unlocked during business hours" shall be placed above the main exit fm:1 doors .,...,._:...LU.,,.._--------------------------------L 11. EXIT signs (6" ¾" letters) shall be placed over all required exi~s and directional signs located as necessary to clearly indicate the location of exit doors. GENERAL . t __ 12. Storage, dispensing or use of any flammable or combustible liquids, flammable liquid$, flammable gases and hazardous chemicals shall comply with Uniform Fire Code. __ 13. Building(s) not approved for high piled combustible stock. Storage in closely packed piles shall not exceed 15 feet in height, 12 feet on pallets or in racks and 6 feet for tires, plastics and some flammable liqui(fs. If high stock pil- ing is to be done, comply with Uniform Fire Code, Article 81. ' __ 14. Additional Requirements.-----------------------~----- --15. Comply with regulations on attached sheet(s). I" Plan Examiner f::1 I\ !'l ""ii.I~.\ A(. V i '~ ,; fl .. ,-'.:.,. Date,_.l...( !'-1/~L--=1,.-+/-ly' {'--. -----,-- Report mailed to architect ___ Met with----------'-----Attach to Plans TO: P.TTN: c:ic.~LLAVJA"'{ goLF 2345 C~mino Vid~ Ro~1e ~a~lsbad. CA 92009 5675 Ruffin Rd.• Suite 300 • San Diego, California 92123~(398 Phone (619) 496-3700 · Fax (619) 496-3777 AMOUNT: PRO-JECT: CA\_LAWA'i GO!...F ... l. I ;~285 Ruth i?T' .Por· d Ro. C Er--1 £-bad, C:A '\, PROJECT#: 0374 C~LLAIJ.JAY ~CjCH . .,,F· T L ' ' ,, \ f f I (.OST CODE DESCRlPTJON 02'010 031CrC) 03i00 0501 () :,, 05010 oe,02q (}61b(i 09030 (i9l00 1. 5(>3C: j8Qi0 Leber· an~ mat•rials t0 ?xpand ~xisting m~zzenine snd construct t~uck dock c&nopg pe~ Smith Consulting Arc~it&Ct$ plans dated :.()/7/,;}1 ~ t'~ar d Ct e me, C or1 c T·i? "t e ~ightweight .concret~ Structural stj&l Lt.. gavge m~t~l r~~mi~g ~hl?et mei:-~l R.~1,gh c-arpemtT'\I c..-~ pf; um o·r ,~wa 11 Paint Fir-~ sp-r·inkle-;·s Cle.an-up ... $ 5>976 10,689 4,150 26, 310. 1,200 5,,, 750 36,.726 8,315 1, 180 4,200. 480 104,976 OVERHEAD; I 1-JSURANCE: FEE: TOTAL THIS COR -,.. $ 104, 976. ()0 $ . 00 721.00 3,297.00 iOS,994.00 i II ., !i II !1 ii II 11 II " ii II II !1 " II / SN)NER ~J:;~O"SJON. -s l'suILDERS 56 7 5 Ruffin Rd. • Suite 300 • San Diego, California 92123-1398 Phone (619) 496-3700 Fax (619) 496-3777 COR CALLAWAY PAGE' n,;o T. !. , ,J#! 707 Vpo~ iign&t~re of the Owner, Construction Manag~~, and Cont~sctor, this farm ~ill ~erve as cu~ written authoriz•tlon to proc~~d with the above work pending .. an.olficial. chang• qrder to a~~ contract ~hawing th• revised c~ntract amount. -! ,;;.·.,. . • . ~ ••• ? -" . • ·• B!LBRO t~ GRJP'F1N :t676 !-iAZ;.\?D CEt~1EF:: t1R~ 5TH FLOOR SNYDER LANGSTON .BUILDERS 5675 RUFF"H..; ROi.:,,D SUITE' 300 CALL.t,i-;A Y ·:?OLF - 2345 (:~.~!NO VIDA ROBL~~ Ii " " S~N DlEGO. C~ 92108 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 -('i J 'l [)?/JDrr l~ fgf:13._11_• __ 1 ___ _ CAHLSEAD, CA 92009(\1:\7_0\G{\ G1of 1 ,, ~-~~!--· ;; DP,TE: _________ _ AL1THCR!ZEr1 -S!G~JA.T!JRE DATE. /j;µ/q_.{ .V-iz. f ------- ... , .. ' ' ' ' '\ AUTHORIZE~ SI~RE DA TE: 1 0 ) 'J. 1-/ ) '1 } • ...L:. r I -... __ ll ii ll II II II 11 11 ii '. ' ,. ~.- ,----------------- •.. ~·-.. .,.. ., '; ,. ,' .f:? l, f • .. : I ."""·,· J,. u:~.LjC:· CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 Las Palmas Carlsbad, California 92009-4859 TO: City of Carlsbad DATE: November 7, 1991 PROJECT: CALLAWAY GOLF JOB NUMBER: 911 1'8 COPY: Smith Consulting Architects 9868 Scranton Road Suite 150 San Diego, California 92121 (619) 452-3188 Fax (619) 452-3907 Enclosed -3 complete blueline sets of the mezzanine plans and 2 sets of calcs. for the above ,, r B U I L D I N G 02/26/92 14:46 Page 1 of 1 ' Job Address: 2285 RUTHERFORD RD Permit Type: PLAN CHECK REVISION Parcel No: 212-062-08-00 vaiuation: o Construction Type: NEW p E Occupancy Group: B2 Class Code: Description: SUPPORT FOR MECH DUCTWORK CB 911377 R M I Str: CITY OF CARLSBAD T PCR No: PCR92002 Project No: A9101745 Development No: Fl: Ste: 6535 02/26/92 0001 01 02 C-PRMT 163ROO ere. "J3<J/'-{ Status: ISSUED Applied: 01/06/92 Apr/Issue: 02/26/92 Validated By: CD 496-3700 *** 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 ESGIL CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO, CA. 92123 /J,z,,,, r-..,__.,...- (619) 560-1468 f t---t2-'1 DATE: JURISDICTION: PLAN CHECK NO: D D D ·o 0 The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficien- cies identified--:----=---------=-..,,...,..--are resolved and check~d by building department staff: The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be ·corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corp. until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the cheqk list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to return to the applicant contact person. The applicant's.copy of the check list has been sent to: JI Esgil staff di.d nqt advise the applicant contact person that plan check has been completed. O Esgil staff did advise applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: ------------- Date contacted= Telephone# ------------------0 REMARKS: _________________________ _ By: Q\, '·So._c\ ... ~ Enclosures: _ _,_N~~~6:..;._;h~<---------- ESGIL COR~ORATION d-I'-\ ,· r· •~ ;-f .,_ PERMIT APPU~TION i· City of Carlsbad Building Department 2075 Las Palmas Dr., carlsbad, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 1. PERMI I IYPR A -D Commercial LI New Bu1ldmg D Tenant Improvement B -LI Industrial D New Building LI Teriant Improvement . C -D Residential LI Apartment LI Condo D Single Family Dwelling D Addition/ Alteration D Duplex D Demolition D Relocation D Mobile Home D Electrical LI Plumbing D Mechanical LI Pool LI Spa D Retaining Wall D Solar )i(other J2cyJ~&:;}I +o p/'JV1 ohd er I -r '6-r! FOR OFFICE USE ONLY 2. PROJECf INFORMATION Address :;J.::Zz:>o r-<c.t~;:J;;;;f f:2;t .Buddmg or Smee No . .. ~- nit No. N,o.t,l--10 *I Pl'19 le,;3'30 D 1 Addressed Envelope NAME ADDRESS S vi t-te, I~ NAME l,.z.y(.)Jl VI CITI ~VIC( no RACl'Oll ""·th~ l'.!18) 'i8-fe -4 £e,4,Jc~ NAME <:;;,hydw L--uia~JU? l3a,~DRESS 5{R 7:5 )::2,; CITI ~ D~ STATE w ZIP CODE q ~2D DAY TELEPHONE ~Cf CP -~ 7cJB, ~ATE UC.#___ UCENSE CIASS ___ . CITI BUSINESS UC. # DESIGNER NAME t:bvJn:t-e ~(..}(,, ADDRESS '\,,t')@Z) -~ · ~ §Je_ ISCf c1TY~y-\~ STATE0 ZIP CODE 1:;2.. /:Zr/ DAY TELEPHoNi ~-0 / BtJ STATE uc. # L 7. WOllRRRS' UJMP lUN 1170'1 Workers' compensation beclaratlon: I hereby afhrm that I have a cert1hcate of consent to self-msure issued by the Director of Industnal Relations, or ·a certificate of Workers' Compensation Insurance by an admitted insurer, or an exact copy or duplicate thereof certified by the Director of the insurer thereof filed with the Building Inspection Department (Section 3800, Lab. C). INSURANCE COMPANY POUCY NO. EXPIRATION DATE Ceruhcate of Exemption: 1 cerufy that 1n the performance of the w~rk for which this permit 1s issued, 1 shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. SIGNATURE DATE s. oWNMcBDilDER Dfil.ARA.1IDN -bwner-Bmlder Declaration: 1 hereby affirm that 1 am exempt from ilje contractors Llcense taw for the followmg r~ason: D I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is_ not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's license Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himseJf or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale.). D I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's license Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects. with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). D I am exempt under Section ------,.---Business and Professions Code for this reason: (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish, or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursu~nt to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (Chapter 9, commencing with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars ($500]). SIGNATURE DATE COMPLETE THts SEcrtoN FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMITS ONLY: Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? C YES D NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? a YES Cl NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? DYES D NO IF ANY OF TIIE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF cxx:upANCY MAY Nor BE ISSUED AFTER JULY 1, 1989 ~ TIIE APPUCANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING TIIE REQUIREMENTS OF nm OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND TIIE AIR POIJ.UTION OONTROL DISTRICT. 9. UJNSIROCIION mmmc AGENCY I hereby afhrm that there 1s a construct10n lendmg agency for the performance of the. work for which this permit 1s issued (Sec 3097(1) C1V1i Code). LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS 1o. APPllCAN't CElt'lrncA110N I certify that I have r~d the apphcatlon and state that the above mformatlon 1s correct. · I agree to comply with all City ordmances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the City of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE 1U SAVE INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLF.SS TIIE crIY OF CARI.SHAD AGAINST AIL UABIUfIF.S, JUDGMENTS, CXJSfS AND EXPENSES WIIlCH MAY IN ANY WAY Acnt.UE AGAINST SAID crIY IN OONSF.QUENCE OF TIIE GRANTING OF TIIlS PERMIT. Expiration. Every permit issued by the Building building or work authorized by such;/ermit is such permit is suspended or abandUcl at a APPUCANTS SIGNATURE :ep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the ted within 365 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by r the work is commenced for a period of 180 days (Section 303(d) Unifo/2 Buh Code). -DATE:!3·2.. ___.. -r, PINK: Fmance --.._ ___ ....,.i::: ,, DATE: ESGIL CORPORATION· 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) 560-1468 JURISDICTION: C ,'"5 o")-CA"\~ \ot\. a. ~ D PLAN CHECKER QFILE COPY QUPS QDESIGNER PLAN CHECK NO: LIO C\ \ -1~71 l.~N)kSET: ( Z) PROJECT ADDRESS: ~8'5 . 'e.uJb".(.Y ~,vo_. (;d___. PROJECT NAME: (ti--c\~~t:, t;.,\1 (-l'!::iocr:: ~u(Y~tt:::) D D D II The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficien- cies identified~------------are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corp. until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. n·The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction.to return to the applicant ~ontact person. II Th_e applicant's copy oi ~ 'r\ y d..v, ~I., m,j :s--r;;;:: the check list has been sent to: S:'-4 7' ~ ·Rt/~~'"' tt s:\ , , II Esgil staff did not advise the applicant contact person that plan check has been completed. O Esgil staff did advise applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted1 ..-------------- Date contacted: ___________ Telephone # _______ _ D REMARKS: ______________________ _ By: a\, ~<.., Enc 1 os ures =-""""-$"'-'.:l~!'.½-:-:...=11=------- ESGIL CORPORATION l 0GA DCM . '-4 .... ,,, l6 C\ l -\!:>77 (g.~ :r:. ~i l ~~_.-c.. \/lS\~~ ?G) I, ;=;-~;~j;;:-~~ ---~~ "' . ..:.. .. ~-;:-,;"',= .• .. ~--· _-:. -:. ~-,-~. ,. - ~ •;; , ~ Date, _1i I I~/~ l Jurisdiction &r f S ht-4-, . Prepared bys "QA,/\,:.(.. VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE a Bldg. Dept • aEsgil + PLAN· CHECK NO. L6t; 1,.. /l7J ({40 k _ BUILDING ADDRESS ~~"BS-Jcv~ :1ofo.-~cl , APPLICANT/CONTACT "S. \.;e...~:,~ _ PHONE NO-'-+t'\u -3]00 BUILPING OCCUPANCY !::> ,-L DESIGNER PHONE _____ _ TYPE· OF CONSTRUCTION JJt: _ I ftt'l-/::,f~ ..CONTRACTOR PHONE _____ _ BUILDING PORTION B9'ILDHW AREA VALUE VALUATION i------------------+----.-----------+~M~U.;;;..;;LT!PLIER ~ I 'e..i.l.Jr(.·,~k) Jl>u l---c--t !1. hr.s. S1 :H7hv 1 ':>o. I~ {r-,::_,,:. \ 'A ·0 ::' l-!-J..-=~~~~:::;.:::..=:.;:~-~:./-'~.:.:.::..:.._---1----..::.~~,w.:.:..-1--__..;;;;..;:;._...!.l,,-t. __ ~~~ a-::::; ?;;_;RP, v t:;~ - i----------.. .. " V ,. k:r-· _·...Jt~-""""F.~=-7'.-,.~-.,,,---,"-1--------------l Air Conditionin~ Commercial Residential Res. or Comm~ Fire S'Orinklers Total Value -- @ (cl / @· Buiidirig Permit fee.$ __ ---'-------------___,.'---______ _ Plan Check fee $ CO 11 MEN TS'-•------------------------------ SHEET Ci) OF (D 12/87 I ~ • <, ' ,,, ... .,::, .. ....:,. :~-I ·=· , .... f ::.:, 1 fr.: LI 1_. I ;U ;-, H C,.. l:::. r·~ ,_,, • .J, • ' ' J• ~ • I ) ; . .,. ' •', 1 • l' Si'f(UCT\JRAI,. STEEL SHAU. CONrORM rd ASTM ; A,36, UNLESS , Olr!ERWISI! NOTED. ·' , 1 ! I j. , • : I' 2. !. STttL PIPE SHAU.. CONFORM To' ASTM A$.'.3-CRAD£ a. 3. :: sra;e'.L TU a~ SHAU. CONFORM. TO ASTM 400-GJ f a: s, a. 1. a. t , , I \ : AU.. MAIN ME:MBF,;RS SHAU. HAVE aol.rs 90NFORM[N(J TO A325N t UNlE;SS NOTEP 011-iERWISe'.. , . . ; . I ; ,I I • ,._ 4 : ~~g;e: Ni%Ti f&t:R~itOR BOLTS SH~ CONF?RM TO, A:307 ' , . . . :; rr~~JN~~~oe~u~Tu~L t~~o\1s~ 4NFORM :ro AWS D t .1 : ~ . . . \ ' j . ~ . . AL!.. 'WORKMANSHIP AND MA!!RJAL~ SHALL CONFO~M TO THE 'lA;iE'.ST-EOn'lON Or TI-iE "'SPE:CIF'lCATibN FOR. TH£ DESIGN, . FABRICATION AND ERcCTION ot: STRUCiURAL . SiEEl rOR 'EIUl!_plNOS"' I SY AISC, : :. ·. . 'IJL~SONIC INSF'~CilON. BY AN AF>1F>Rovtd TESTINd A~cNCY SHALL BE: ~tQUIREO rOR ALL SHOP AND FlEJ:P. GROOVE WELDS IN : COMPLIANC£ WITH u.a.c. STD. 21...:a. -COLUMN FtANCi;:s OVl::R 1 1 /t' DIR~CTL Y BE.:HINO GR00V£ n.L.i;>$ Sl:/All 8£ ULTAASONICALLY INSf)ECiEO F'OR ·01scONTINUl1Y: \ t ; ' ,. t . 8. ' WEB . CONNECTIONS OF tR.AM[ SE:AMS SHIJ..L NOT SE 'NOHT'ENE:D UNTIL AFiER. Fl.ANO£ WELOS ARE COMPLdED ALONG £ACH LINE: OF' COL.UMNS AT . ~CH r"t.QOR. P/ibvt()lf: ERECTION 'SE<':!U~NCE'. FOR 'BUILDING Dt'.PARTMtNT APP~OVAL. ' .\ ! ,. .J .· ':=~. ;· .. . . ~- • ,",, • ,·, '."·. :, •,' '' ,•, . ... ' -~ ! ·'i ,, .. ; ,,:" I ·_; . '-:: ··:·. ! ' . :, ! : ·, ·: .• ·~. f'~VIDE: SpEC\AL lNS Af ALL iW~L.DINb. l ,.• ---.:...) ~! ------,...------~~~--~-----:--7 ... -., ,., 1 • FEB 25 1992 . ·ct~J of CAfH .. ~SA1D eun,.,oiNG DEPT .. i ! t / 1 • :i ., '' ' . ;;, . ; . . ~ . •,, ,, . ,, ,, :: . C 6 q \ -\S ~' -{ ' . ~' ., ;, STRUGTURAL ·, STEELi. (STRS.TEEL) . i f-• -,;;;, 2::, ~ •• :·4: •l, ~~ ·}t:::; ~J;: ·c5lti (,/jJJ•·. ~-.f~::. / :f ~\-~·: •,) . ·,, ... ,:· :i· /o_:JJ! \.._~__.A > ., ·, ., ,i ' '.i . \'. . . . ii . J ' I' ;: ,: ,, !I I i I 11 •I I . I . . . .. ·.··!.$NUTH.: .. :CONS:U.;L Tl·NG ! . • : I q .. ' .. . . A 0·1'LifT-:C~T~·· lJ ::,:: ;• .. 1~~t:,: ;: ; ···· ... ' . ,,,, "!. ' '' . ' : • I . : • I • • ·,1 l • . ··~~ . ~'. ' ~· ..._., ·: .... . ·~'.A.· ~·.\;.I·. ' I• • a\ .. I "6!" .•,.. ' i '-1 l • I -' J q: ·:rt; . ·pr:·r< P.Af.J lcL aL·, .. · ... -~)(1~1"- // PANE,L t-,:+--r-,-----,...:..--~-l- A . .... ,/',""""•\• r'W·~"(•" • p ~ : \ , .. ·····, ... _, ~ ~~Jl:e rs s i ' 2..r»;,. vi . ,r . TS <, ~-4· -~.-·~·-·' '14-~~~:. ... , ._Aa.l::G.s.Hol.t.: · .. ~ . .. . ·, . ·... ·:. • .. i· ~ . .. .. 4?:fy:1,».;X .:.~. :.-T$1 Q, ,; · n·~ 11·-:Ji t-:if'-" "r: ... e · ·rl!-·i .. ~ ... :1..-Jt;·r· .. Al~~-. . ... Qi a . .'FL.A\-! ..._..__ __ _ I , :11 ' ,\ """, ~ } < • ;, ' , I I ' 1, ) • C>-~~:·t·~7.-:---.:-:--:-~:-:-:--·T· ,: " ', : ' , '.' , I ,' ; , ,'" , ; , , , 11 '! " ,! ' h \ I ,' , • : ' -.-.\:tj .-.--,.,,.._ ----. ~! ~ . : .. t,....... .. . . . ;, l . . . . I . . i : ·I •. .. . .. i ... . . . . { ) . I I ) ,: ,. !,, ,, i• . : .. '. \ : .. I c I' ' ! .( ' 1· ' \ I ' 1-, ---I I J I I I ~ i i t ,. ! \ \ ,. 1 I. I; ':: '1 •, ', '! Jhi---.;;:..4,---1--------~-:it.t:~~:.·~- ' l . ' '. :. ,·. ,:t :, ·. : .. ' ·f: :' ? ; --.....:. I / .. ·"ls. ( ;. _i; ); • > I I ! ' .. \ f ;; · .. ! : .. I · i :, : . I: ! I i ! I (._ ~· ! l 5. I > • l t I , ' ! I ' '' NoTe.: . MA)( Due-T w~i0i-t:T 14.& 16/F~ . . . -De:rAIL/'d 0 . .. , .. l . 'l . . ~-~-~~-~L--. .. . •. " _ · t=. -.· =:i.·: . ,·. · rr -~ I .AJJ. ..... J. ~ ---'--i-----....__----- ! - i ·. i I ·; ; 'l ' ' i 'f I 1 . ·., . ..;,'.·:.: I_ ·-t--.. --~· ' ~ ' ' -"--'--------.u_tl i\!, ]!! Z!· ~-_:,, I ~~! ! j . '1· '· i' :.:® " ' . ' '"1 . ;· -----~ ,-.. - "-··"I 7 J . ~-.. - :•' . ' I~ .. • I 1f • • ~ • \I ••• •(,I ·, ·; t .,., \ill ·:· ~ .J. t .. • , -•' --,.,:-,. -'S...,-"";7,.,• --- ,1, ' I ' .,, ., I : : ; .. _. i "' .,1,, .... I ! .. I ! i I I j'". i 'l' , ... ' ~ SKT Structural Engineering • 15375 Barranca·Pkwy. • S~ite A-201 • Irvine. CA 9271 B • (7141727-9070 , . SKT. · Smith consulting Architect_s STRUCTURAL. CALCULATIONS FOR JAN 06 19~Z . MECHANICAL DUCT PENETRATION AND SUPPORTS CALLAWAY GOLF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 1988 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE SKT JOB #T91046C PLEAS·E NOTE THE FOLLOWING: COMPUTATIONS INVOLVING SCIENTIFIC PRINCIPLES ONLY SERVE AS A GUIDE FOR THE EXPERIENCED ENGINEER AND ONLY ASSIST HIM IN . MAKING ENGINEERING· DECISIONS. THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS REFLECT THE · TOTAL DECISION MAKING PROCESS. ANY EVALUAION OF THE ENGINEERING DECISIONS MADE BY SKT STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING SHOULD BE BASED ONLY ON A REVIEW OF THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. . ( ( rM ,,.. :lKT Structural:Enginaaring K 23.141 Verdugo Or.• Suit:• 200 Laguna HIii-. CA S28!!53 _________.;..-' ___;' .__,__: -"-' ~· • __ , I• ;.__j___ ____ • . ·-· -·-. _ __._ .. ------t ' ~-. ' --.-·--.. ----··---, --· . ---- ... -~ ~--_i;f~-jio. ~-~~~l-- • ·-------•-r·-#". , ___ 1_._1 ___ 1...,_-~ --.,--• • •. -·---~ •- I .. ---------.. ---~--·· ~ -,.... . ~- ~' rQ . .. ··-.-~ .-. I .. . . 1 ·· .. . . I ,,, vr::1'2;.T1~i-~~ I I . l ~f ~ Q'b,(p ~ef t-9-0~d-)( t~/~)( 8 1 )( 0f~~+ lo~Js):::: l't,'21(p [-}o·hl) ;: .l,. I I ( r!.{rll/)L":,) l ti.~S~Y"f\ e.. r°" I r1 l o.::a.c l ~ · _ ~eci,r,e ~,"i:7trt ~-eJ . t-hr"'-,· -bl"lt.z:..I ) F~ ;;;: M~U1:;rc %1_·1'' IL l~.A.11)\ ~. 06-CRr ~ . . . @_ ~ Led . · ~ur-1 + 3.,. UP I · ) · l-1~ ""' l 1 ' '7 I+ ~. 'iCe) l 7 ; 7 ~ '.].x: & • t,7,;! X-IE'Pi,e\-) ~ 161° I ii' ~~I -~C11,1<.P')c__ :)'X.1C20 f:!:_1?ft,;i..) =--44~ ~ :l_ -r" k,ito~ d . . j"e,t,1ec:,t ~V)'\J I ,I i I ., ( \ 231.41 Verdugo Cr-.• s·uite 200 Legune Hilla CA 928!53 -----···· ' ". ·--~-. ------!..----~-.. -~----·------~------..... ·-~ .. --------· ---: =-=-~--~-:f~ V~Tl~.t=,,_:_-1 ~. . --~ -:::..:_ -~ -~---~ ~ .. ---__ ~--~-_: __ · · --· --~ ~---=:-=~-- · -· -·· --.. .. . :fl-'. ·-·. ··-·. . . .. ·r'-.-- ~-~~~ · : __ --~-~ ~~~ t Pjc,-\h~I_+-_ F,~~l-,( ~-~:~-1-··11&.i~·;s101_~~_c -. t¾,~~~-- : ='.::~ : . . ,O,t ;t__ -t_q-)&O<!W >--:i9o ;;,,, t-~::: ~---~= --: : ~ . =-~' +.--: /-----f.-.= lvC;.024r/@l,"X_7,7,s'')~ ~f'o; L.,-~;: ~ .·· )\\ LJ~e~n);c. (84 ,I ps-J-)( ~,~10) -{)_t;C)~tg- --'kl:::::::-6 l o I # ~~ · --~=-·· · li--n~I = ~t,-i.,' ,t_ :/t1ia:>) C7 ·7~:i.) fr~=-'-$~~~ ·h :::= 24, ~ ( ~5f-uh :;e ~) = 7D &:]_~ ~--~ 1f -=-~~Cc,~ \LQ/ 2-L?t-.. e --7,87G11 I f r :: ,, ,Ii i I I r l ,. . SKT ST~UCTURAL~NGINEERING 15375 BARRANCA PARKWAY SUITE A-201 /""".~VINE, CA 92718 \._ -4 727-9070 Title: Scope: Number: Misc. : - Dsngr: Date: 22-Dec_-9i ----------------------------------~--------------------------------------STEEL COLUMN DESIGN Page .. ~ . . . ------------------------------------------------------------------------DESCRIPTION>> Calloway Mech. Opn'g >> at Gridline D.l & 1 ---------COLUMN DATA---------- AISC SECTION ------>>TS8x8x5/16 ------------DE.SIGN DATA TOTAL COLWffi HT. = 2 4 • 3 ft SUPPORT FIXITY --->> 1 << l=Pirt/Pin, 2=Fix/Fix, 3=Pin/Fix 4=Fix/Pin, 5=Fix/Free (Bottom/Top) UNBRACED LENGTHS: X-X AXIS = 24.3 ft Y-Y AXIS = 1. 5 f_t ---------------------------APPLIED AXIAL DE~D LOAD = 15.7 kips II LIVE LOAD = II II SHORT TERM = II Fy = LOAD DURATION FACTOR= COMBINE LL & ST ? 36 ksi .· 1. 33 . .· N .y/n SIDESWAY l:Restrained, 0:Free x-x·AXIS = 1 Y-Y AXIS = 1 EFFECTIVE LENGTH FACTORS: X-X AXIS = 1 Y-Y AXIS = 1 LOADS------------------------------ ECC. for X-X MOMENTS= 7.875 in II II Y -Y II = in Dead Live Short SLoc ~Loe -----~---------------------------- X-X AXIS MOMENTS: Y-Y AXIS MOMENTS: POINT LOADS: (k) UNIFORM: (k/ft) TOP BOTTOM BTWN ENDS TOP BOTTOM BTWN ENDS x-x Y-Y x-x Y-Y = = = = = = = = = = -----------------------------SUMMARY ·USE: TS8X8X5/16, Max Stress Ratio= Load Comb .•• >> Dead Formula Formula Formula 1.6 -la = 1.6 -lb = 1.6 -2 = 0.351 Actual & Allowable Fa: Allowable fa: Actual Fb:xx: Allowable . fa: xx Actual Fb:yy: Allowable fa:yy Actual Stresses •.. = 13 .1·s = 1.68 = 23.76 = 5.44 = 23.76 = Max X-X Axis Deflection= Max Y-Y Axis Deflection= -0.846 in in 0.43 Live 13.78 23.76 23.76 @ @ -0.2 D+L k-ft k-ft k-ft k-ft DL+ST ft ft ft ft 24.3 ft ft OK OK 0.351 0.432 OK 13.78 1.68 23. 76 5.44 23.76 18.32 ksi 1.68 ksi 31.60 ksi 10.75 ksi 31.60 ksi ksi 12.64 ft from base ft from base ------------------------------------------------------~--------------- ---------------------------STEEL DEPTH = 8.00 in WIDTH = 8.000 in FLANGE THICKNESS = 0.313 in SECTION DATA I-xx s-xx R-xx = 90.900 in"4 = 22.725 in"3 = 3.116 in . . ' . SKT STRUCTURAL 'ENGINEERING 15375 BARRANCA PARKWA~ SUITE A:..201 ,--"'~VINE, CA 92718 Title : ~l(~G<..J~ Scope. Number: Misc : . L_ .4 727-9070 Dsngr : Date:·22-Dec-91 STEEL COLUMN DESIGN · . J?~cj~ . :_+ . ·. . . -' . . . ~--,· -. . ------------------------------------------------------------------------WEB THICKNESS = 0.313 in AREA = 9~36 in"'2 WEIGHT = 31.;78 #/ft r-T = ' INTERMEDIATE STRESS -------~---------F'ex (DL+LL) = 17055. F'ey (DL+LL) = 4E+06 cm:x (DL+LL) = Q.60 Cm:y (DL+LL) = 0.60 Cb:x (DL+LL) = 1.75 Cb:y (DL+LL) = 1.75 -r~. E::> 'f.b-t-~ltu M" ~ 'tc:>,j \_>, 't ~ --9r;2. .. 7 lvi "!, A-;. 4, ~CP dA C)L-tST ~'"'-~ a,vnb,· 4r~cs.s .::::. , i?~ psi psi ·1~-e~~ -::s-~1~~)(,~) ~.+~:2---- I-yy s-yy R-yy CALCULATION VALUES F'ex. (DL+LL+ST)_ F'ey (DL+LL+ST) cm·:x (Dt+LL+ST) cm: y · (DL+LL+ST) Cb:x (DL+LL+ST) Cb:y (DL+LL+ST) u0~: -rs. e,'?'-b~,o/(~\1 ~~u rt,~ = 9 o :~9 o.o · in~~ = .... 22. .. 73· in."'3 ~ •. i16 · in .. = .. .. ---------------:_,.- = 2268.3' •.. psi · = '6E+06 psi == 1.,.00 = 0.60 = 1.00 = 1.75 ( ( 23141. Verdugo or:• Suit:e 200 Laguna Hil(-. CA 826!53 • • • 1 . ~-t_,__.,. _____ _ -·-·-~-----__ ,,, ~·-.. --__ ;___ ___ ~--·-,--,! __ . ~ --... --~· ·-~-------'-· --'---• ;---·----...._,. ____ - --· ----------------·--------· -----.. ---- -. ' .. --·--... ----;-----.---~-· ' . ;. . ----~----··- ---_,. ·-. __, ·-. ---.----. ·-,--· ~--=--~-~---~·=·:~-· .... f'--":)0CR_:2. tt + 5101 w_ -~ 'C:>~to-a~~-:~~:~-~ -----~:_·.-~ ··<:~-~~-~:--~~~~~~-=~~--~ ----..... ------~-·-- 112--'"[ llt-4-HIL.il le-~ i 4~1~rnl~~L ~ ._ .. _ ---.. ----~ :~=-=·=--. \.(ll-w ,. 7,1 ~6;t ----.. --~-~: ·:: 1 '?,\I~ , L 4 ~:tr· -rel ,le,I~~ t~ <:2:--) blt<:::> V ~it -:::: e:,<beo-# / {)._ =-1o ?>2 l I,?,:=, It ~ l\_ .. zs' )(_~ Q) 8-) --=-~~ . . ... . -.. -=.... ~-: -~~-· -· -.. t""~c"' -'!3?:;¼,2~1-~~ "° ,7c,,L__l;i3 ~~: : @ ~e- r~ 1~7~~ f.¥2-1 1 z}I ~L~ . :fl=-~ rb-~ ::: l G 7 :;..s / 7 r-::i.s :;:... ~. ?- t~ (3)b~lh . --r.:::: (o.~rif )(_~6'-+ \,-y~) ~ ?5°#" J (I/~ J-t/ -544-1; . ·+ ,zgJ/ --~ ,c( l I oo ~ / r v 1"" '11:: -/7r2--s /i<ta:, ~ · · u~,~ ~IL--TI ~61k \lf4 ~L~@ i~11 ~/" to ~ I f-~ kx,::,e ~ -~ce @. te,ll.s,/~ 4D/ f ~1 eVJJ be cf ~-t. r { ( Jft·••; '3KT .Structural enli!inaerlng K 2:3141 Verdugo Cl".• Suite 200 Laguna Hilla. co. eeees . -----~--~.- r: _....C"--1-A~L...~-L..i.;..,;.A ........ WA'-'--:-Y--==;<4'_______..~'f __ .Qt..;, T4l $24& -+-f'-f-l-H~As=e.:;..._JJI~· . ____ av · :$::,t:-J .-. --::---------=-~---°"~ Dec-, 'fll ~- '-/ SHT ~-.-OF--- _____ , ·-'---~------ ---------. -·-···-----------;· • I I ,·PAGE NO. ****************************~********************* * *· * S. TA AD -III * * REVISION 14.1 (VERSION 14 LEVEL 1) * * PROPRIETARY PROGRAM OF * * RESEARCH ENGINEERS,INC. * * DATE= DEC 23, -1991 * ' .. * TIME= 15:52:43 * * * ************************************************** 1. STAAD PLANE . 2. *Callaway Golf Air Convey Support Columns (rigger) 3. OUTPUT WIDTH 72 4. UNIT FEET KIP 5. JOINT COORDINATES 6. 1,0,22,0 7. 2, 7, 22, 0 8. 3,7,13,0 9. 4,7,0,0 10. MEMBER INCIDENCES 11. 1,1,2 12. 2,2,3 13. 3,3,4 14. UNIT INCH KIP 15. MEMBER PROPERTIES 16. 1,2,3 T.kBLE ST PIPE OD 5.563 ID 5.047 17. CONSTANTS 18. E 29000 1 2 3 19. DEN .000283 1 2 3 20. SUPPORT 21. 3 FIXED BUT MZ FY 22. 4 PINNED 23. UNIT FEET 24. PRINT MEMBER INFORMATION . \ , STMD P,LANE · PAGE Np •. *Callaway Golf Air Convey Support Columns (~igg~r) .EMBER INFORMATION ------------------ MEMBER START END LENGTH· BETA· JOINT JOINT (FEET) (DEG} RELEASES 1 1 2 7.000 0.00 0,00000000000 2 2 3 9.000 o.oo 000000000000 3 3 4 13. o·oo o .• oo 000000000000 ************ END OF DATA FROM INTERNAL STOMGE ************ 25. UNIT KIP FEET 26. LOADING 1 DEAD LOAD 27. SELFWEIGHT Y -1.0 28. MEMBER LOAD 29. 1 CONY -.56 2.75 30. LOADING 2 SEISMIC LOAD 31. JOINT LOAD 32. 2 FX .17 33. LOAD COMBINATION 3 34. 1 1. 0 2 1. 0 35. LOAD COMB 4 36. 1 1.0 2 -1.0 37. PERFORM ANALYSIS PRINT LOAD DATA P R O B L E M S T A T I S i I C S NUMBER OF JOINTS/MEMBER+ELEMENTS/SUPPORTS = 4/ 3/ .2 ORIGINAL/FINAL BAND-WIDTH= TOTAL PRIMARY LOAD CASES = SIZE OF STIFFNESS MATRIX= TOTAL REQUIRED DISK SPACE= 1/ 1 2, TOTAL DEGREES OF FREEDOM - 54 DOUBLE PREC. WORDS 0.01 MEGA-BYTES I 9 .. . \ , , STAAD PLANE ' *Callaway, Golf Air Convey Support Columns· .(,rigger) ,OADING 1 DEAD LOAD ----------- SELFWEIGHT Y -1.000 ACTUAL WEIGHT OF THE STRUCTURE= MEMBER LOAD -UNIT KIP FEET MEMBER l UDL L1 LOADING 2 SEISMIC LOAD --~--------- JOINT LOAD -UNIT KIP FEET JOINT 2 FORCE-X 0.17 FORCE-Y o.oo L2 CON -0.560 Y FORCE-Z o.oo PROCESSING ELEMENT STIFFNESS MATRIX. ,T PROCESSING ~LOBAL.STIFFNESS MATRIX. ++ PROCESSING TRIANGULAR FACTORIZATION_. ++ CALCULATING JOINT DISPLACEMENTS. ++ CALCULATING ELEMENT FORCES. LOAD COMBINATION NO. 3 MBINATION 3 LOADING-1. 2. FACTOR -1.00· 1.00 LOAD COMBINATION NO. 4 MB 4 LOADING-1. 2. FACTOR -1.00 -1.00 0.423 KIP L 2.75 .LINl MOM-X o.oo MOM-Y o.oo 15:52:52 15:52:52 15:52:53 15:52:53 15:52:54 ***********·* END OF DATA FROM IN'rERNAL STORAGE ************ 38. l?RINT ANALYSIS RESULTS PAGE Np. LIN2 MOM-Z 0.00 ', 'l, · STAAD PLANE PAGE NO. ', ,o *Callaway Golf Air Convey Support Columns ('rigger) OINT DISPLACEMENT (INCH RADIANS) STRUCTURE TYPE = PLANE ------------------ JOINT LOAD X-TRANS Y-TRANS Z-TRANS X-ROTAN Y-ROTAN Z-ROTAN 1 1 -0.85596 -1.13:554 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.01389 2 0.39767 0.37205 0.00000 o. 0.0000 0.00000 -0.00443 3 -0.45829 -0.76349 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00946 4 -1.25364 -1.50760 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0 •. 01832 2 1 -0.85596 -0.00174 0.00000 0.00000 0.Q0000 0.01196 2 0.39767 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000. 0.00000 -0.00443 3 -0.45829 -0.00174 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00753 4 -1.25364 -0.00174 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.01639 3 1. 0.00000 -0.00111 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00389 2 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 -0.00217 3 0.00000 -0.00111 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00172 4 0.00000 -0.00111 . 0. 00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00607 4 1 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 -0.00194 2 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000. 0.00108 3 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 -0.00085 4 · 0. 00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 -0.00302 ~SUPPORT REACTIONS -UNIT KIP FEET STRUCTURE TYPE = PLANE ----------------- . NT LOAD FORCE-X FORCE-Y FORCE-Z MOM-X MOM-Y MOM Z ~ 3 1 0.21 0.00 o.oo 0.00 o.oo o.oo 2 -0.29 o.oo 0-. 00 0.00 0-.00 o.oo 3 -0.08 o.oo o. o·o 0.00 0.00 o.oo 4 0.50 o.oo 0.00 0.00 0.00 o.oo 4 1 -0.21 0.98 o.oo 0.00 o.oo 0.00 2 0.12 o.oo o.oo 0.00 o. 00. o.oo 3 -0.09 0.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4 -0.33 0.98 0.00 0.00 o.oo o.oo "' r1 ~ STA.AD PLANE PAGE Np. •• *Callaway Golf Air Convey Support Columns (rigger) (-.EMBER ENP. FORCES STRUCTURE TYPE= PLANE -----------------· ALL UNITS ARE --KIP FEET MEMB LOAD JT AXIAL SHEAR-Y SHEAR.,..z TORSION MOM-Y MOM-z: 1 1 1 o.oo 0.00 0.00 o.oo o. 00 . o;oo 2 o.oo 0.66 o.oo o.oo o.oo -2. 74· 2 1. o.oo 0.00 0.00 o.oo o.oo ·0.00 2 o.oo 0.00 0.0Q o.oo o.oo o.oo 3 1 o.oo o.oo 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 o.oo 0.66 0.00 o.oo 0.00 -2.74 4 1 o.oo 0.·00 o.oo 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 o.oo 0.66 o.oo 0.00 o.oo -2.74 2 1 2 0.66 o. 00. o.oo o.oo o.oo 2.74 3 -0.79 o.oo 0.00 o.oo 0.00 -2.74 2 2 0.00 0.17 o.oo o.oo o.oo o.oo 3 o.oo -0.17 o.oo 0.00 0.00 1.53 3 2 0.66 0.17 0.00 0.00 o.oo 2.74 3 -0.79 -0.17 0.00 0.00 o.oo -1.21 4 2 0.66 -0.17 0.00 0.00 o.oo 2.74 3 -0.79 0.17 0.00 o.oo o.oo -4.27 3 1 3 0.79 0. 21 o.ob 0.00 o.oo 2.74 4 -0.98 -0.21 o.oo 0.00 0.00 o.oo 2 3 0.00 -,-0.12 o.oo o.oo 0.00 -1.53 4 o.oo 0.12 0.00 O.QO 0.00 o.oo 3 3 o. 79 0.09 o.oo o.oo 0.00 1.21 4 -0.98 -0.09 o.oo o.oo o-.oo o.oo 4 3 0.79 0.33 o.oo o.oo 0.00 4.21 4 -0.98 -0.33 o.oo 0.00 o.oo 0.00 *******'******* END OF LATEST ANALYSIS RESULT ************** 39 • . :J:..OAD LIST 1,3,4 40. P~TERS PRINT 41. CHECK CODE ME~BER 1,2,3 ,. ~ ' STAAD ·PLANE *Callaway Golf Air Convey Support Columns ('rigger) STAAD-III CODE CHECKING *********************** ALL UNITS ARE -KIP FEET (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) (AISC) PAG~ 1!0. MEMBER TABLE RESULT/ CRITICAL COND/ RATIO/ LOADING/ FX MY MZ LOCATION. 1 ST PIPE 2 ST PIPE 3 ST PIPE PASS o.oo PASS 0.79 C PASS 0.79 C AISC-Hl-3 0.254 o.oo 2.74 AISC-Hl-3 Q.4_06 0.00 4.27 AJSC-Hl-3 0.408 o.oo 4.27 ************** END OF TABULATED RESULT OF DESIGN************** 42. STEEL TAKE .STEEL TAKE-OFF PROFILE ST PIPE LENGTH(FEET) 29.00 TOTAL= WEIGHT(KIP) 0 •. 42 0.42 **~********* END OF DATA FROM INTERNAL STORAGE************ 43. FINISH *************** END OF STAAD-III *************** ****** DATE= DEC 23,1991 TIME= 15:52:58 ****** *~************************************************************** * FOR QUESTIONS ON STAAD-III/ISDS, CONTACT: * * RESEARCH ENGINEERS, INC AT (714), 974-2500 * * TELEX: 4994385 . FAX: (714) 974-4771 * **************************************************************** 1 7,.00 4 9.·oo 4 o.oo . • 12 r r 23141 Verdugo Or-.• Suite 200 Laguna HIii• CA 812Be3 ±; ---: _ -:: -. . -: . · ==:: : :: ; :~±, ~ : d= : : ~ : i : : ; ' ---· f~(/.-Z)(ff,0-~ IJ?.! : :.• :.~~-:-lf )->-_:-~:' , . , ,__..,.......,.iEt(o~~t~1i):·_-;-~ai=i1~-=~ =--~~=--::_-_-::~=~;----: !-~--: _ _ i I ! I , .; :. ; : __ ••• __ :_· ;. _,. 1 • t f 1-~ r ·/-, , , _,____.._, f • ! ', ·t I -~:i--(ns)7:ia,) _;..9J8/:~~ •-------===' =:=-i-.··_:.: i; -=?f~t-~~1/~_·:-·_2_~_1~-~-~ • I •: ~ -~ ; -:~-= _·-·_:~~-----/-~1_:75-#-:_ :~----~----:5· ---~-10-u,;r-..s;·it:>1,·rs. ------c _________ ·_, ----y t-/ , lc::.J:: ,.,, rv,-,, '-"'""' ____ 1 ___ -------~-----------__ .. _____ -· ------. --L,f ~ -------___ _,__. --- .: ~--;-~:r~·-__ r;i~·1 # 1----------------. ------------. ----· ----·--·--- STRAP -----. . \ . ----i--,--. --·---------· -. ----·-----'----------·-·--. --. -----------.----t----· . --...---- 'eiiy · Qt Carlsbad Fire Department • Bureau of Prevention Plan Review: Requrrements Category: Date of Report: t\(1Qnc;fay, January 13, 1992 Building Plan Check Reviewed by: Contact Name Address City, State Mark Langan 9868 Scranton R9 San Diego CA 92121 Bldg. D~pt. No. 91-1377 'R,6l) Ste 150 Planning No. Job Name Calloway Golf --,.---------,.--,------------ · Job Address 2285 Rutherford --------------------Ste. or Bldg. No. _9_20_0_0 __ _ ~ Approved -. The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans; information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifica- tions, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report. cart result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. D Disapproved -Please see the attached report of deficiencies. Please make corrections to plans or specifications necessary to indicate compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. For Fire Department Use Only Review 1st'----2nd ·---.3rd._-'--_ Other Agency ID CFD Job# .91127-3 File# -----,.- 2560 Orion Way • Carlsbad, California 92008 • (619) 931-2121 ~ " City o·f C·arlsbad Fire Department • General Comments: Date of Report:. Monday, January 13, 1.992 Contact Name Address Mark Langan 9868 Scranton Rd City, State . San Diego CA 92121 Ste 150 Bureau of Prevention Bldg. Dept. No. 91-1377 Planning No. _____ _ Job Name ~alloway Golf -----....a....------.......... -...;...._ _________ _ Job Address 2285 Rutherford Ste. or Bldg. No. _9_20_0_8 __ _ Revision-datf3d 1/9/92 Approved. 2560 Orion Way • Carlsbad, California 92008 • (619) 931-2121 ;j l j'2j ' ~··. \ . ,--· '4 . ---- i .. I' . . l . [·... . .. f. I<: ,_ .. J 1 . ·( \ ' '-..J -