The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2285 RUTHERFORD RD; ; CB992411; Permitv lf:113;6 . -· ·.:, City of Carlsbad 09/14/1999 Commercial/Industrial Permit Permit No: CB992411 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 438-3101 Job Address: Permit Type: Parcel No: Valuation: Occupancy Group: Project title: Applicant: LANGAN MARK STE200 2285 RUTHERFORD RD CBAD COMMIND Sub Type: 2120620800 Lot#: $100,000.00 Construction Type: Reference #: CALLAWAY GOLF INDUST 0 VN MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE Owner: Status: Applied·: Entered By: Plan Approved: Issued: Inspect Area: 12220 EL CAMINO REAL SAN DIEGO CA 92130 858-793-4777 CALLAW~ GOLF CO 2285 RUTHERFO~D ·2 ~~~~~ . @~_ ~ «:(r) \ ISSUED 06/30/1999 MDP 09/02/1999 09/14/1999 Total Fees: $1,137.69 / ~I iyrfient';,tiJ-j~03Jl\ '-./~l~~ce Due: I (;._ . I -. _\ ·.. ,. \ $733.83 FINAL APPROVAL Date: ~f6!P Clearance: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $41.00 $20.00 $30.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,137.69 ·NOTICE: Please ke NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "Imposition' of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as "fees/exactions." You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set asiae, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that.your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capactiy changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which ou have reviousl been iven a NOTICE similar to this or as to which the statute of limitations has reviousl otheiwise ex ired. CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (760) 438-1161 '> .. P.ERMIT APPL.ICATION _ CliY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT . _2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad CA 92009 {760) 438-11'61 Assessor's Parcel # / Existing Use · · --~-2 ... ow2 .... oe FOR OFFICE USE ONLY PLAN CHECK NO. qq .. 2. L-f l ( EST. VAL tcf?,cou Plan Ck. D~posit 9, (!) 3; 'i(C. ~";!9!/'<tl/~7-¥2 . 62 «.1-86 # of Bedrooms # of Bathrooms Address City State/Zip Telephone # Fax # _,fsen~i,~llll!~~--~ El'~~_nei-:;~~!'t;(Qt'~v-'.!1!\t.~-_.::: .. ~~~:Jf:5::rfjjS:I:2-'52-Ffjf,if~ Name· Address City State/Zip Telephone# 1,:·0·""eRoesii¥Y-·owNitR''' '\ ·.-::.,---_:-:-·--,._--,,,: , ·.:·.;-··;·_ -, .----·;r,""· ,.z;i·:,··;,:-:_,",,·:·::'.'/·>~;--~·;,,.:··¥1.f"~\ -_--_ , ------~--~--z;: · --,, -(20 ~ ... ,.,BAB' __ , -. ~·-""Cf~v;i::> VJ !ame_ -=----·--~-~dress ________ ------_ -----,--• c~-, ___ ,:tate/~~~~~~-2'h:._ .rn L~;;,:,:,:¢.Qf!'(BA9:"t:Ql3;~;,9Q.1X1l:>J!N:l;:t4~!1(1JLi-, · -·--: , , , ; ,; , , ,, . ,,, . ~ ,, ,,,, ... ,_ ~"'· .• ,, : ___ ,.·.-·;.,c.,:~--~ ,,,,.,/4,,,;:.,,;,.:;:;;:::;;.,\;:-'.Lt, ~¾:,, ·,, ,.;:;,,,,;:'0,;.,;::,_, .:u:,;,:,;'.c:i .,'. :-i (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to const,ruct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law [Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code] or that he is exempt therefrom', and the basis for the alleged :exemptior, Any violati~n of, Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects ihe applicant to a civil penalty of,not more than five hundred doll s L$500]). 101-c:J: · · """" · \ e :'.;,/Z..7 · • N' · Name Address City S te/Zip Telepho # City Business License # z../3 /, [ 0 s (J' .Cl¼-.,, Designer Name : Telephone(j;sf> .State License# ('.; f I , 7t?:/ ·Fi!'~,,w~~?YX9B!<:~e.§~':,~9,Mp~"s:~y,:(qt(,.~·,,· ,1 j·-'~" '> ~,, ,, n, y ""'" ---"-~ ---~F----~·---~~ ~ ~·.-•s·.~--·v--:~,,.:-~*{l" ' Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: 0 Lhave and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labqr Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. , ~ I -have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the .performance of the work for -which this permit is issued. My worker's-compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Insurance CompanvJ t4 dlo!k::::i+( ..,_ n el Q.!)"'A"" .:r;;c.. Policy No. v,)c., 7'l'.l 8 ZZI 5 Expiration Date /l~ 1 -C? 1 ,('!'HIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS [$100] OR LESS) 0 CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in ar\y manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. WARNING: ·Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars 100, i addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 37Q6 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees. -DATE °'._-t'±: '\' 'l , , .. ~~:n~'.·,' W:'>,•V,, , , , v >. "" q n, nn•v,'." .'"M(~",,";<" :::•>,-< ,·:··~;:::,• <:!1,, ·;;~;>•j,!-'~ ~--~<:; ,/f' ~:"~ ":\"•~:·:1~'-.::--:~~ ';; tl I, • as o , r of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or ·offered for sale , (Sec •. 7044, Business and Ptofessions Code: The Contractor's License Law does •not apply to an owner of prdperty who builds or-improves thereon, and who does -such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or ·improvement is : sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or impro,ve for the purpose ·of sale). 0 I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and• Professlons Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). 0 I am exempt under Section ______ Business and Professions Code for this reason: 1. I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for conf!truction of the proposed property imp_rovement. 0 YES ONO ·: 2. I (have / nave not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. 3. I have contracted_with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed constn,Jction (include name / address / phon.e n1,1mber / contractors license number): 21-: I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the ·major work (include name / address / phone . number/ contractors license number): ______________________ ---'----,,---------~-'----------- 5. I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the-work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type of work): · · ' · PROPERTY ,OWNER.SIGNATURE __ ~------~------------DATE ________ _ ~pr}fe,1ITT[fffi~:\;'QJEilfa=p13~N~r}d~S{Q~~-t)fw~it~4~ti,~{,Q!ii(t:~-,-:_:)::: .. ~~~:::::::..:75..-:'!i':E.~-~~~~~-5:1F- ,s ·the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534-of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance.AcCOUIJt Act? 0 YES O NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? 0 YES O NO , Is the fac;ility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? 0 YES O NO IF ANY OF THE ,ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL ·CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE.ISSUED UNlESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE .REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. ~:C-:'.:~~1:B!l9f!PJ1Aem>JN~'§e[~y .. -:'12...:., · :·~:::,.:. I.hereby affirm that there is a construction ,lending agency for the performance of the work for which 'thi_s permit is issued (Sec. 3097 (i) Civil Code). LENDER'S "NAME , LENDER'S ADDRESS m~~~I'~t~A'N,t;Q~~Tjfl,q'Ml.O~ ,, C;, , :,, '"'' --, , ,;., , , , ,, :.-~~,\:.. ----,_>~·.::,.,~"":_~-,;'"",;"'"a,,;,:;,,;:::, :=_::; __ ::::;._;::::.,=:..=:_:...,,__='-;::;_~;.: ::;_ ~;: __ ;,,_.;::~:::;;:·'::i,,_=--,,=-~-=;=-=:-,=~:;::,_;;:,;1®:;::\:;,-:,;;_:;;:::;:;'.k:;;:,i:::;}-L::;7;::;L;;:;,=,f,.,,;:::,,,:;;,L:;,~=-""""-::;<;:, -:;::,=;;.,,,;=·,:=:,:;:::=,.,:;:6:;-·:,:;'.:::;;;:;:;,:.::;'.L,:::7:;::.'=;;~, ~--;} I certify that I ·have read the application and state that the above information is correct.and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State -laws relating to building .construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the Citt of Ca,rlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE DE FY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH M IN ANY Y'/A'~1'1't: AGAINST SAID CITY IN· CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE a demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. r -the provisions of-this Code shall expire by limitation and become null arid void if the building or days from the date of such P\lrmit or if the -building or. work authorized by such permit is suspended e. d 180-days (Section 106.4.4 Uniform Buildi~A~:deJ. @ / sd/t:tvf ~., + PINK: Finance l I I ) I City of Carlsbad Inspection Request For: 1 /4l2000 ~ Permit# CB992411 Inspector Assignment: TP Title: CALLAWAY GOLF Description: MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE Type: COMMIND Sub Type: INDUST Job Address: 2285 RUTHERFORD RD Phone: 6198433586 Inspector.£ Suite: _ Lot Location: APPLICANT LANGAN MARK Owner: CALLAWAY GOLF CO Remarks: Total Time: CD Description 19 Final Structural 29 Final Plumbing 39 Final Electrical 49 Final Mecnanical -- Associated PCRs lns12ection Histo!}'. Date Description 11/30/1999 89 Final .Combo 10/28/1999 61 Footing 10/28/1999 66Grout 10/21/1999 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 10/15/1999 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 9/30/1999 63Walls 9/28/1999 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 9/28/1999 12 Steel/Bond Beam 9/27/1999 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 9/24/1999 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 0 Requested By: JIM Entered By: CHRISTINE Act Comments Act lnsp Comments co PD AP TP CONT. FTN BTWN CLMNS AP JP P.G.@Ct.MN BASES AP TP INFILL WALL @ TRK DOCK DOOR AP PD AP TP LN 4.5 BTWN PILASTERS WC TP AP TP PLASTERS (4) AP TP PIER FTNS MRK ON PLN AP TP PIER FTS SEE PLN FOR LOC. • .• Cltl or Carlsbad ,_;-,.....,. · Fln"I ~ldinu lnspecuon ::::: d~lneerlng Planning CMWD st Lite Plan Check#: Permit#:. Project Name: CB992190 CALLAWAY GOLF ENLARGE EXISTING DATA CENTER Address: 2285 RUTHERFORD RD Contact Person: NA Phone: 0000000000 Sewer Dist: CA Water Dist: CA Date: 11/24/99 Permit Type: Tl Sub Type:, INDUST Lot: 0 ······················································································································~··································· Inspected Date By: Inspected: Approved: Disapproved: -. _ . Inspected Date By: Inspected: . Approved: Disapproved: __ Inspected Date By: Inspected: Approved: Disapproved: __ •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 1 Comments:.,...-_____________ -,--______________________ _ r; /, EsGil Corporation 'l.n Partnersliip Witli (jovemme.nt for 'Builaing Safety DATE: August 31, 1999 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 99~2411 PROJECT ADDRESS: 2285 Rutherford. Rd. SET: II PROJECT NAME: Callaway Golf: Dust Collector Enclosure ~AP~NT JURIS.· D PLAN REVIEWER D FILE !ZI The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. D The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and ohecked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on th~ enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. D The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil · Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. ·o The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. D The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: !Z1 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. D Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person !ZI REMARKS: Fire Dept. approval is required. By: Kurt Culver Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC log l::nclosures: trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858}560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 EsGi:I Corporation '1.n Partnersli.ip 'Ulitli. (jovernment for 'BuiUing Safety DATE: July 12; 1999 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 99-2411 PROJECT ADDRESS: 2285 Rutherford Rd. SET:I PROJECT NAME: Callaway Golf: Dust Collector Enclosure ~NT ~ Q PLAN REVIEWER Q FILE D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. D The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below ~re resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete .recheck. 1:8:) The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D · The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. 1:8:) The applicant's copy of the check list· has been sentto: Mark Langan 12220 El Camino Real; #200 San Diego 92130 C8J Esgil Corporation staff did not ~dvise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. D Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone#~ Date contacted: (by: ) Fax#: Mail Telephone Fax In Person D REMARKS:. By: Kurt Culver Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D·GA D MB D EJ D PC 7/1/99 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858) 560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 .. Carlsbad 99-2411 July 12, 199.9 GENERAL PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: Carlsbad · PROJECT ADDRESS: 2285 Rutherford Rd. DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 7/1/99 REVIEWED BY: Kurt Culver FOREWORD. (PLEASE READ): PLAN CHECK NO.: 99-2411 DATE REVIEW COMPLETED:· July 12, 1999 This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbihg Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced-by the Building Department. · You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. ihe following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations, Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1994 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for ·residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of twoways: . 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculation~/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92009, (760) 438- 1161. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, ·CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans.and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to th~ir Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. · Carlsbad 99-2411 July 12, 1999 _ 2. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each-item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. 3. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to -the· plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on ·the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? D Ye.s Q No + PLUMBING, MECHANICAL AND ENERGY CORRECTIONS + PLAN REVIEWER: Glen Adamek 1. The licensed designer must sign each ~heet of the plans. 2. Provide data on proposed hazardous material to be stored and used. UBC, Section 307 and UFC. (A Hazardous Material Technical Opinion and Report) a) Clearly show the types of hazardous material that are being stored or used, as per the UBC, Table 3-D and 3-E classifications. Provide the material safety data sheets (MSDS). b) Clearly show tile amounts of each type of hazardous material to be stored and in use-. c) Clearly show where in the buildings each type of hazardous material is being stored or used. d) Provide the required manual shutoff control for ventilation equipment as per UBC, Section 1202.2.3. 3. The City Fire Department must review the new Hazardous Material Technical Opinion and Report. MECHANICAL (1994 UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE) 4. A complete review of the dust collection system will be done when the complete plans and calculations for the compete new dust collection system is provided. 5. Provide complete plans of the dust collection system including ducting inside the building to show compliance with UMC Chapters 5 & 6. a) Clearly show the type of material to be conveyed by dust collection system. b) Clearly show the duct materials are suitable for the intended use. UMC, Section 609.1 Carlsbad 99-2411 July 12, 1999 . c) Clearly show the exhaust duct material and gage used for each duct size. See UMC, Tables 5-8 & 5-0. d) As per UMC, Section 503.1 detail'the followi'ng requirement: "Electrical equipment used in operations that generate explosive of flammable vapors, fumes or dusts shall be interlocked with the ventilation system so the equipment cannot be operated -uriless the ventilation fans are in operation." e) Detail the required make-up air as per UMC, Section 505.6. f) Detail ducts conveying explosives or flammable vapors, fumes or dusts shall extend directly to the exterior of the building without entering other spaces. UMC, Section 505.1. g) Detail minimum duct conveying velocities as per UMC, Section 505.4 and Table 5- A. h) Detail duct cleanouts as per UMC, Section 609.4. i) Detail required explosion venting -of dust collection systems as per UMC, Section 609.5. j) Detail duct support as per UMC, Section 609 .. 6. k) Detail clearances from combustibles as per UMC, Section 609.8. I) Detail protection from physical damage as per UMC, Section 609.9. Note: If you have any questions regarding this plumbing, mechanical and energy plan review list please contact Glen Adamek at (619) 560-1468. To speed the review process, note on this li$t (or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans. + ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW + 1993 NEC + PLAN REVIEWER: MORTEZA BE:HESHTI 1. Specify the wire insulation (i.e. THWN). NEC 310. 2. On sheet E1, the notes do not match the referenced drawing. Also complete the drawing by including all electrical equipment locations. 3. Provide information on any hazardous/classified areas to be designed. Include any emergency power that may be required. NEC 500 Note: If you have any questions regarding this ~l~ctrical plan review list please contact Morteza Beheshti at (619) 560-1468. To speed the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans. Carlsbad 99-2411 July 12, 1999 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PREPARED BY: Kurt Culver BUILDING ADDRESS: 2285 Rutherford Rd. BUILDING OCCUPANCY: BUILDING PORTION BUILDING AREA (ft.2) Equipment Enclosure - - Air Conditiontng . Fire Sprinkl~rs TOTAL VALUE PLAN CHECK NO.: 99-2411 DATE: July 12, 1999 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VALUATION I VALLJE MULTIPLIER ($) 100,000 (per applic.) 100,000 D 199 USC Building Permit Fee [gl. Bldg. Permit Fee by ordinance: $ 621.08 D · 199 USC Plan Check Fee [gl Plan Check Fee by ordinance: $ 403. 70 Type of Review: [8] Complete Review D Structural Only D Hourly D Repetitive Fee Applicable D Other: Esgil Plan Review Fee: $ 322.96 Comments: Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue.doc 5196 I ;,) -~ .PLANNINC/ENCINEERINC APPROVALS PERMIT NUMBER CB ~ °I ~ d-\./ I l ·RESIDENTIAL TENANT IMPROVEMENT RESIDENTIAL ADDITI.ON MINOR .PLAZA CAMINO REAL · (< $10,000.00) CARLSBAD COMPANY STORES VILLACE FAIRE COMPLETE OFFICE BUILDINC OTHER 'bO-ck.-u~ UV\1± -~f ~l(-e.~r: I . . PLANNER f:>~ ~t---L~ DATE _____ b_/_~._l1----~-'---- ENGINE~~ DATE <B-/;~/27 oocs/Mlsforms/Plannlng Engineering Approvals .• . ;,:\~t\ : ... e Carlsbad. Fire Department 990269 2560 Orion Way Carlsbad, CA 92008 Fire Prevention (760) 931-2121 Plan Review Requirements Category: Building Plan Reviewed by: Date of Report: 07/07/1999 ------------ Name: SMITH CONSULT ARCH Address: 12220 EL CAMINO REAL STE 200 City, State: SAN DIEGO CA 92130 Plan Checker: Job #: 990269 ------- Job Name: Callaway Golf Bldg #: CB992411 ---------------------,- Job Address: 2285 Rutherford RD Ste. or Bldg. No. ~ Approved D Approved ·subject to 0 Incomplete Re;iview FD Job# The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and / or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes and standards. Please review carefully all comments attached as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. The item you have submitted for review has been approved subject to the attached conditions. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal. Plea$e review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. Please resubmit to this office the necessary plans and/ or specifications required to indicate compliance with applicable codes and standards. The item you have submitted for review is incomplete. At this time, this office cannot adequately conduct a review to determine compliance with the applicable codes and·/ or standards. Please review carefully all comments attached. Please resubmit the necessary plans and I or specifications to this office for review and approval. 1st 990269 2nd FD File# 3rd Other Agency ID FROM SMITH_CONSULTING-OUT 6197934787 P. 1 P.01 City of Carlsbad Questions below refer to work being done for this permit on{v. fiumbing • Nur:nbcr of new or relocated fixtures, traps, or floor drains? • New building sewer line? • Number of roof drains? • lnstaU/alter water line? • Number of water heaters? • Number of hose bibs? • Gas piping system • Yes __ No K -.€}- Yes __ No !5,_ ~ lnstall _ Repair • Number of new or relocated, gas o:utleu: • New water meter • No.of~Size PotalM~ Irritation Electrlcal • Number of n~w panels or sub~nel~? • Single P}1ase , 0 • Three Phase 0 • Three Phase -480 • Remodel (relocate eldsting outlets/switches or add outlets/~itebes · M,ecbtutical • Number of ftlmacc11. AIC, or he~t pumps?. Ke-~ o ~ • Number of fireplace$1 " • Numbi:r of exhaust fans? • Number uf exhaust hoods'! • Number of boiler~ or compressors? • New or reloca~d duct work? Size ·of New Service • .:JLA . . Size --WA, Number of amperes J!L Number of amperes --1:if!_._ Number of amperes ,if Jc Yes >( -No-"-"._ Number of HP'f Yes ~ No __ BEFORE THE PERMIT CAN B:& FE~'J) OUT nns FOBM NE.EDS TO BE RETURNED 1'0 THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT -FAX NUMBER (760)438-0894 .; l. ,, . -. !; •' • , ,; . ' ~ ... . ~ :,S:-. ·;. :.;· __ ... -- r . ,--· PRIME STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS 16980 Via. Tazon, Suite 260 Se:in Qiego, California 92127 Tel (619). 487-03.11 STRUCTURAL\. CALCULATIONS 9%--/601 ~~/ofdf-e· ... · ·/?6'r2 t 7f!rw. / f · .. ·/ I \J · j_', J;,:;~.:.J:.>,c-j .. : I • j ; _________ ~--·--' ·-------'--·"----· ---·------···-----··--· ·------·-·-- ~-·--··--.f -----'~---·-..-__ 1·------M·-----------------~---·------• ---•, i i --_, ·.1 ; : i f\ l, . ' . ! l ' l ' C ---·-·---·--------· ···--.···-'···. -----·----·----·----·-----------.. ---......... --~ PRIME·---· . -JOB:-+-Hiil':ffl - Gt2?,lQ~f.:@ :. ___________ ------···------·-c···-----·--------~----~---· -~--.e,,A_STRE~~w= ~---· -- ·:,, I I j : I ' +' i ' ' ' ' I • ~£~ • i • L---------+-~ ---:---~, ! • J ·------·--'---------------------·-···-----·---------· A l .. __i, nwri o·~ ~L-ltrlN'? -,, J I ._ ••• Wt(:.... -·----•-.....:-----· --·-- . . l J 1 ·; ·--:-·-~-·--·-~~ff.112? WtO'ttf ~--~~ ... --~_v········-------·-: ... :1'· i ' ~ ~ i ---• . ; ! . ; . . ,-' . i -,_ . ..1-! ; : . wA,; , .l c. l 6 ; '. c; :·--·--··-------·-·-·--· --------· _____,__,___ ~--~---·---·-------~Ll-v ~~_9 _'½Q ____ -·-··-·· ·------·· --- 1 c..:.. , • . i -0 ·o . C"\ . : ! ·1 l ; . ' : • --. ------~- v) ~---·--·-~-------. -----------·-·-·----.--,--.--, ···--;-----···---------· ---·---------· -··· -· .. · ....... · 1 _____ '.----~ _____ ·-·------··· ----·-·--~pr21u,t<4 : v · ·--___ : --·--· _ ... .. ·-____ _ -. --· ·-----------·--·---·----·------------------·-------------------. ---·er·----.. ----·-· ---·-------· ---··1· -----------·---------------·------·----Wt~ \._ob~ t0" Ly-tb ~ _\t~ ~ -11: --·~"f-. ~-.. 0½ __ _,{ ~t;~ .. ~/;( . ____ ----·------·-----·- __ , _· _ V\Jtv,;; lLl~)( Ir ~ I ~~zG ___ -t.._ (?~& ____ [_U'~,L ~· --------~~~=~--- -·C:,·-: : W~ ;_ t\.l4 ~ ! · tt-: · ' ~-lf ~--·;,_1:: __ BI~-.--· 1 ~~\1-~o/ , . . -----------=~=-~ ~-~~l-l t~~~ ~~1 ~trt~B·,; ~ c;~~-:, ~M: ,i~~-~171/-·b ic-~===~=----_ ----· .... ---'.--'-·:..._l_ ___ ) : '. ; '. iv-· : _, __ !_. _.l.r '. · 1 • : ' . : ' ' I I . . ~~ : (? : I.{€( i-fi.t 1LG . . r Ji~tlf i t, ' r . tiv ";" ---··---;--:..-. ~-~ b.4-%-~-;-0._bc==r~ . ---r-o,.L ---·----~ L-~~ ".l ) i -v.i:..v.f-~~-:-~~c l?r --------- --·. ----: -.-! . ;--<1'-------------i : ---------------------·-- ' ------.; _:··-0~···~---'~; .. 1?fi';---t)~f~~v----~-,-L)~:~ ___ v: L~q~~)1z---. -_----·--··--~--~ ' .. [2 0 .-~·t). •• --------------------"·----·-· --·-----------.---------• --------• -----------·-·----:-------------H ---• -----·-·---~ --••• -----·-·---· ·---· -· - ---:------:-s.···--~ · oc{lf1t?1,; f-2-;l-:;.· { ~?' ~ -; %:Z( ?:?'---~ ~-----·--.-·f--· --;---~----· rr·-· --··--____ v--VvAf-. _____ . , _ 1 _ . ,_ ·-. __ . ___ .,, __ o. o /) 17.-1-~i,L . { "k_ ___ L. '??i ____ . _ .... ____ ----·----·----·-_____ ·------~1 vi Ot?(L_)l __ t'., ----·-· ---, 1~. -·------·---------·--·-____________________ _ ,. _'_ -·· ·!' . ·:·i _: ____ :_. - • ,J ' • -·. I ·, -~ :~V?[V' . 16-<IK.".'.' -1 ..... I .. --· ........ -----. .. . ... ------·----· . 1 /4~~ .,, . _.;~~. " /8,l"' v-< ,-if~~-.. ' ---·--~-..... ---· ----~-------- . . . ~~ -~f "-\ ~H.o-{01 + ~ P~ 1" 0t>1e?. ~~ -k 1,,r.t;o -r-. \-o ?~--, lv' ~r~ -~lV ~ " -. " --. . -· .. . . --. ----·--- . ~R-8-lo1-'{Q11--~ ~~ .. . t:i,:; ~ -~-~-..... . -----D ~ --! -· 1.----~! .. c ... -. -·----~·-·· -----_·_::~~~--:·-------~~i: ~>z,~~-i-l~U.M?q \ .... ------------------·---------------··-------·-------- ___ , -----_____________ .. _____ ---------------.... . .. ·-.. . .. , .. ····----·-···. ·---·-· ·-·--·---------- ~ J--------· _· -..... _---' '-· . --. . . --------------·-----· ------~--------------- A l(';_J ' 0 .. ,.t ... GRADE BEAM ANALYSIS PROGRAM Footing LENGTH = 5.50 ft Footing ·wIDTH = 5.50 ft f' oot.i ng DEPTH = 18. 00. ft Cone Weight = 0.15 kcf Surcharge = 0.00 ksf footing+ Surch, = 14.85 klf POINT LOADS (k & ft) 1 X 5.90 2. 75 MOMENT LOADS (kft & ft) 1 X 50. 25 2. 75 RESULTANTS (k, ft & ksf) CASE 1 pt 87.58 X 2.18 Q max 4.71 Q min 1.08 MAXIMUM FORCES (k, kft) CASE . 1 V max 16.65 M 1T1ax 29.18 M min -21.07 (4.02) 06/24/99 99-160a ,_. 0: ' ._ ... GRADE BEAM DESIGN PROGRAM (4.(12) DESIGN DATA fie = 2.50 ksi fy = 60.00 ksi Load Factor= 1.40 SHEAR DESIGN Vmax = 16,7 k Vn = 27.4 k Av = 0,66 si/ft b = 66,00 in h = 216.00 in d = 212.00 in Ve =1399. 2 k Vs = 0.0 k S max= 24.00 in Vs= 01 stirrups ~re optional 1 I 3 Stirrup @ 4.01 2 I 3 Stirrups I .s.o• 1 i 4 Stirrup @ 7,3" 2 I 4 Stirrups@ 14.5" FLEXURAL DESIGN M+ 111ax = Mn+ = As str = As Bar I 4 = Beta 1 = 0.85 As min= 46,64 si As max =186,97 si 2'3,.2 kft 45.4 kft 0.04 si 0.06 si Bottom Steel No. Space 0.3 M-min = -21.1 kft Mn-= -32. 8 kf t As str = 0, 03 si As = 0,04 si Top Steel No. Space 0.2 (16/24/99_ 99-160a ., . -------··--·----------------~----..,.,..,.,--,----~~---~ 0 i.; . .o COL FTG W/ H=21-o• GRADE BEAM ANALYSIS PROGRAM (4.02) Footing LENGTH = 5,25 ft Footing WIDTH = 5,25 ft Footing DEPTH = 18. 00 ft Cone W~ight = 0.15 kcf Surcharge = 0,DO ksf Footing+ Surch, = 14.18 klf POINT LOADS Ck & ft) 1 X 2.00 2.75 MOMENT LOADS Odt & ft) 1 X 41.73 2.75 RESULTANTS (k, ft & ks f) CASE 1 Pt 76.42 X 2.08 Q max 4,4'3 fl min 1.05 MAXIMUM FORCES (k1 kft) CASE 1 V max 12.87 M max 23.66 M i!iin -18.07 06/25/'~9 'A_··· PRIME X-B: -~ STRlJCTl.RAL ~7I: _,.._,_..11 ,.~~ ENGINEERS SHI' : ~ V .o COL FT6 W/ H=2'-0" BRADE BEAM DESJ6N PR06RAH (4.02) DESIGN DATA f'c = 2.50 ksi fy = 60,00 ksi Load Factor= 1.40 SHEAR DESIGN Vmax = 12.9 k Vn = 21. 2 k Av = 0.63 sifft b = 63.00 in h = 216.00 in d = 212.00 in Ve =1335.6 k Vs = 0,0 k S max= 24.00 in Vs= 01 stirrups are optional 1 I 3 Stirrup @ 4.2" 2 t 3 Stirrups@ 8.4" 1 # 4 Stirrup @ 7.6" 2 # 4 Stirrups@ 15,2" FLEXURAL DESI6R Beta 1 = 0,85 As min= 44,52 si As max =178,47 si M+ max= 23.7 kft Mn+ = 3£.8 kft As str = 0. 03 si As = 0.05 ~i Bottom Steel Bar No. Space ii 4 0.2 M-min= -18.1 kft Mn-= -28.1 kft As str = 0.03 si As = 0.04 si Top Steel No. Spa,:e 0.2 06/25/99 t• . ' ' I' t . !· . i • !( •· •. 1, .. --·: --·· ---· --·-....... -· --.. ---·--·----... •· .... --_ . A .. PRIME.: . JOB::z1;: Ir£. STRUCTURAL DATE: - ·· · ·----· -..C:,£'1:l ENGINEERS SHT : ~ ,A -·-------------··--· -__ ,_,,... . . -~·-·-=~-~-~·~-·-~~~(~ -b~::c ....... -_· -. . 0 . . : : . : + --.-· ·---· ---· -·---·--·-----'---·----. --- . -~ --;.· ~-~ __ .. _e·.~: z:.rtt?'~--~~.; ~,~=~~=:--.=.~=-~~-:_--;---···'--~--· --· ----·-'-··-· --· -· -·-···-1 --~---------------·· ----·-·----. -' . ' I I .••. ·---·-·--:·.; __ . .1~~=-~0:~r~·;·~-~~-_il;;:· .. ~-t~-~~;·ne·:-~b:::.~:~·:·:-·· .. _-~-: --- -· -· :...~~~ -~-.· .0 t~.:;; _· ·-l(;;r__~~-·-~~-·~~-~-~ili~ -D / -v c· I . VL l . -(l'-1.. ---. . --·--. --A~--=-· rw~<1 ... ~ j: . -----·-----·---. ·-··· ·-·-·· ... --.. -. . .. . . .. . cf . t ... '5,y c. ___ . . ! ~-!' r 75 ~ . 1 s; .. 7 ~ ~ ( Io~ --. ----~---~~-i,c:-~/'h-C9V. --·------···-·· ~-, __ .. ~ ~ ---_ ... -· ---·· -·-· -·· -------_ i?~--i.;-~~!]~;_l r·:i jf.~-··-~_:-~~:~-.--::---~. :· . M ~ [~c71l/l,~ J{~ ;. (L~ 7 ~ { 'f~ ( 1:fo ,c 1) :_Lt-' !,~I --;;;£· --~ 11 :1<1C/ . ·----. ·-. -_ l~ ..... . . --. . . . . . . ... ... . . ... -----... --· . . . . ..-... :uc,t;-r~t~i ttb"~: ~ rfz..; · -=1/~ ~--[1,cf_r:,1.v~ ~J1;\V~ .( ~,p~_tff7.~ . _ .· ... _·· .. ____ .• --------------------· ----. . -----------. . I -----------.. -·------------·-· -·---------··-------·-----. ··-.. ·-·-··. •" -·-------.. -·-· ----·-·--C-.. -{)~:.'~ f=:_7/8f-k1°J. r.~> ___ . -~--... ----------~-------~ ...... ~---------------. ··----·----' -:__]· .. ·~---,-----··.·--·-·····----...... -....................... -.. --'---_ -----·--·---. ---·----.... -.... -·-·-·-... ---.. ·--' --·----...--.--------------------~----~- A ~.., f ic= B= N= EDGE DIST= BEARING = BASE PLATE DESISN 2.50 KSI P= 1:4, 00 in M= 14.00 in V= 1. 50 in LDF= 2.00 KSI SQRH A2/ A 1) = ~ uu~ 0.00 KIPS 17.57 H-KIPS 3.14 KIPS 1 ':l':1 ,..,., 2.00 a= 1.25 in Mmax= 229.75 "k Sreq= 6.40 in"3 T= 17.45 KIPS t= 1.66 • Base PL 1,750 X 14.(10 X i4.0(1 O" ", L • .J -~ . . ;-· A PRIME .a: ~ oA-,;,-_"A STRUCMA!. OA-:E: ~ L,;,:..~ ENGINEERS SHT: ,_ I f ~v ., i ,, ----·-----------:---..:.___;.._:=;__ ------··-~------· ·------·----·-·----· ·---------- ,-( ·-----------------~ -. ~ --· --.... ·.----------------------- . -------·------------·---------- :-------------· -----·-------- ! -------________ i_ i ---'-----------·-----··-- -------------··-1---------__:_....1. -· ------ -.---,------'---------··-· - .! -----------"'---' ____ , ___ ---------~·~-~0f~~-~-:~f:~··-·-- -------··-----------------------'----- -------------------------------·- -----------,--·-;-----·---··---. --------------------·--·---- 0 ------, ------- --------------·------------------~i~. ~. ----'----'-·------.--;....~. . --------------f:--------- ---:----_;,_ _______ _ , ___ __:_ __________ -:----,--....;..-'..i..-_:_ __ --------------.. ---------------------·-----·--·----. ------------------ -----_________ , ________ _;__ __ ----------------------------- -!-------· --: -----------,·-------·--· --------------------· -----------~-----------------· -------·------------ ----------- -------·---------------------. ·---------- ---.---------·;--·-----·· ---· ----------------------------·-------·-------- ---------------____ ,e_ -----···---~·-,--------------------'------ ! .--------~--! ---------_____ " __ _ 1 .---·--r-+----'---'----_____ __, j . ' 10:r--,__;__._- --··---------------'---..:......--------'--'---- ------------·--'----'----·----- r--::\ -----------------------------~- f . · -J~-j ----·----------- . , .-_ -r· _ I 1 · I 1 1 ":"O?S ·FORi,1 331·4 --, -.L -i L ; • i j ' ., , :-,:.·,.,,';_,,;, -c·:>u ,,, , :· _:., __ ,,,., • ·-, . ., • -_' ----=~------. ------. ---.. . , ". _]!_ __ _ __ ,_.,. -· ·-----~--------.J 0 ' ' AT CORNER COLS 6RADE BEAM ANALYSIS PROGRAM Footing LENGTH = 4.00 ft ·rooting WIDTH = 4.00 ft Footing DEPTH = 18.00 ft Cone Weight = 0.15 kcf Surcharge = 0. 00 ks f · Footing+ Surch. = 10,80 klf POINT LOADS (k & ft)· 1 X 1.00 2. 00 MOMENT LOADS (kft t ft) 1 X 17. 57 2. 00 RESULTANTS (k, ft & ksf) CASE 1 Pt 44.20 (4.02) X 1.60 4"/ 1-, Q max 4.41 ~ t.Y f-? ~ t;,~ J Q 1Jin 1. 12 '- ttAWiUM FORCES (k 1 kft) CASE 1 V max 7,0'3 M max 9.29 M min -8.28 06/25/99 99-160a 0 0 l4't, -!-~ _; I Ji AT CORNER COLS GRADE BEAM DESIGN PROGRAM (4.02) DESIGN DATA f'c = 2.50 ksi fy = 50.00 ksi Load Factor= 1.40 SHEAR DESIGN Vmax = 7.1 k Vn = 11. 7 k b = 48.00 in h = 216.00 in d = 212.00 in Ve =1017.6 k Vs = 0.0 k Av = 0.48 si/ft S max= 24.00 in . _Vs= 01 stirrups are optional 1 I 3 Stirrup @ 5.5" 2 I 3 Stirrups@ 11.0" 1 I 4 Stirrup @ 10.0" 2 I 4 Stirrups@ 20.0" FLD:URAL DESIGN M+ max= Beta 1 = 0.85 As min= 33.92 si As max =135.98 si 9,3 kft M-min= -8.3 kft Mn+ = 14.4 kft Mn-= -12.9 kft As str = 0. 01 si As str = 0.01 si As = 0.02 si As = 0.02 si Bottom Steel Top Steel Bar No. Space No. Space I 4 0.1 0.1 06/25/99 '39-160a -------------------·~----~· __ _; ____ :_ ____________ ........+--- ,----- -·· A---PRIME : . JOB •q;f_1b,,A ; Lr£. SlRUCTURAL OA'IB ~ --·. l:ls::.'O. ENGINEERS-SHT : . , , , ---.. .:.... I ·-----------·--· --_______ ; - i ----~---·- --------· __ , _______________ --------· ---------------···· --~-----~A:frs-~; ·-;c;;. ~~~-~ifii~1A=--k~r;v?:1o:·;J}a.7~~11u·- . --·-1--... --------------------· ·--. --·---· . _c_~ I~. I i ----~ ,j; ! ---------'---- -----~--------·---------- --------!-----'---------·-----------. ---'----------- ---·----· ________ .. ---------------------··---.. ··----.,------• ________ _c__ __ ~--' : ) --;-····--- --------·-·--------- t------· -·------:---c-- i t-·· ; ~----· . ------------------- ___ ! ___ _ -------- -----~· -----· -----· ---___ 1 ____ ------_.,. __ ---------------· ---------------- -----------------·-----'---- --------''----"---'---- --·-------~--:_---,----------------- ---:----· ~ . l~~~--,---'--_L_--,------___,_ l J --:--'---_:...----------:----- .,------:-~-' -----________ ____:~....:.._--------------- : ~J~---t-t-;-~-~____:-~ i: . i ~ . j .. -f TOP.S F6Ri"i . .23, 4. _,_ ."! ... :·,'"~tt~: ! .. l I 1 1 ""'--,,,-.. ·~~.::_ •• ~-~-_!, -• .:_,,.;,.~ -' ··;:-::-· ;:---. ~ ' .. ~·' I I ~-,-:-,,----;------!--~ ~=~l ~t=~~-+1 .-t----'t---+.1 ;__+-t1 :..-~· +~f~4:___,;.,~1-+-_L_J_J_l, __:_:_-·)1~=-r1 :. J)~--=rj ===t=:= -, =-~ ------r·· ,. l "'{,{: ------·------___ _:____ ---··-- _._;>~ :::! . ·-------- 0-·; ·. / In!tf . )ii!!' Atr fl~tAI' --- --- /) f,, j I) ! ct h / t f' .,; cf r ""wJ b'"i";jV,;f'j lt;q:/i; ,( - t(..,fvtf-e.1 !/f fh;.1 ~,../J,:>J..-JPll. :,..r( /~(~? rf;'{f.' f<:.fo~{(e>1t1£: f):>e£f-e~ fh(l'P;fj h 'f,1;; IZ.cf.:>-C/cN1t ?<1/e 4/if ;?1 Jly, f" 'Ith" {/I./ f ( V' ; Pr"r f' C re J I fty ci --1 j h { .;-I :.-r Jr t7 L i,";e.f I f J. I ... \ •• < . .~1· -I --~-·'1: ~-~. /v'of e,: _Jy :n1 In t'/or1; 4 vt e fo f h~ y ~ /.,f:~-t> ,1_,;171;y -:;t1~. · ~: f~v;;1,.i:4f1of) t.~.JJJ ~:re ,:,~(y,-J/lfd l/ /011:/ lfi~ ,i.i ·,r; tf-:.{/rec-:,;/Jftt'fe"1~;t"'l-1;f tc .r,n.1,.-rA,r-;'/aw, _r l~r~-::.:?/if,'. l'{/6' :her./Y: P,i1r ft'i1 fl,'c/.-,~h tht. \ -----· . A11&Ji~1f~I'// Jf {};F· l~~!)r(/~;;e-b~/e.. _. /:J :A(/fli'/Jly (p,./dJq;,-ily (/,(-tP-4;," (·;J~t''r.f;, -/ r ~ ·--. :. -~:·I~ . . 0 j e i./ /Ill /t-L :J ~ . ./ / ;; t Y' ( /> i1 f /o 1/J ; . ___ ... . .. .. (F~ .t/4t. t,, 11:,.QJ I :___j ''/(oA t-:1 ii 4 ;/Jfl '' .lfv uc ft/Jr~ ( K ~ f,, () Ii): -f!J .. .I ec, 2 J l$ )< tt7 k ~~,t~rttil ~ • -1 l-1 ~,.-.,{./r 1< O,!J t /~c~hJ { A//f/JtJ;tq-ty ,1~/f ~C f,on J ·· ·· V: 0, r-Z. L vi .1 w h ~ v f : ~ = 0, 'I { / e i / 1,,1 /c i: ~ t-1 < 't / I ;. /, ,J (ft 'f 11 J .. o~-J O t c 1-1 r -1 11 .(. y ) . • I I V;: { (), >) { o, 1r) { !. ") l{/ _;-~ ,< w /<..:;I:; .. t: Io 11 e ; V::. { 0, ;;. ) ( b 2 t<) _; / 2r 1;_ /<. Of1VJ:: (1;.,'f ){t,7r): fg,7tl'w- ·; ! /, f/4r-1r j.:,~J on f~,d1 of fh< ft>f.,fv" t,.:;:tYJ-! VA ~t.,hoY ~~If.:- , I • I • _,. /.2 ,.,. --") t<" ~ (° i ht K,.:) ( 0 _,. {I!:/ Yi f /) 'f j f 1 I./ e Jr} t,/ l -~ "' ), I . J,\/ (/,1 ~--ftiot') !Jf 0,11(~,t,v~:-y..,)/ . I ( . I • ., ; 6, rl {;:. J. l,, • f-1,_ • ... ::; -L.I () ,.... 11 ~.~ AJ?'U1 f...ll?t r-,-i,,f!,f-t!,5""-9-,) 7 'f,. l ,~ · Ct; I :tt m_ t; J. ; n e l; . .(. 0 ... 0. J.-'/ _-:: 0, 't 6 Y: 0 "( M u v~riic~/1u./-1 ()~ e-11.h of f/;e f~o ip/(lf•]'f/i1 /;;(/~/ :;f: . C·I· 1-·· 1 -:.i 0,t-1.;)/er.1l:;.1.1gKJ..1 ~ (;/ 17') n 1/:I ~ ... I 0, r 1 I T 'i' ~ ~I t1 JI?~ ~ :n t J. ;; ___ /_~, 4 ;Jlf.:~~·/1 ___ :~ g, 1 ~ t} ·-, ,. ,· i. '>.!-• ~-~ . ,, . .-:]11 ......,,.._ _____ ............. ...,,.. ... ,",,_...,.........,_ . -H . . . . • • ' ' I ... __,,.,. • -.~ ··---------~ · ·. · r.:·r: r ::.:::i .: ;:··.: -:: .. i:'. ;·: : ------:---..·---t· .... ,..,_ -2,0 tOper. [11..:. 0 I!) J .. l)~j 0/eY- , .. -· 1·--z;f} ;"",f~,~~; ··-· .... :, .. ••••·-·····; .: ' ' • , "' ': ....... ,, 0 '" •• • ····-:···.. • 0 .... ! ; ___ ·:····· ., :. : .. ~ ' . ! '! 1.·<!·i f ,-./c :· · 0)1"' 1 Of.·.,,y_ '. · i J.iJrti' ,,..'(. ·"'• ,.. • ... i ~;7fif ~ .. 6.'~:-z 11 ~tr~-------'"----J-.t~,/·;;:>~1, 11<tf:· . . . 1 l f.rT t • I '!' •" • '~ ' l · .. , ; ' ••t : ..... rIJ .. .-. :.: i : ......•.. : ... :. .·.: ... · .... i.. ...... :.~·-·-··-·~-.IL.. . . ... L--~~. : .... : .. :_f DJ J.ot} OteJ,j r . • . .., e1J/'IJ1t. i7Jt 2,tr~ 7,f Kt} 0 ,,,<{ ,-. ,,t. "'-'fcV: r . ·, , If{ 1 J 0./ fl/ ic · If, ·r-J, ! ' . . . j ••• t ••• DAILY REPORT 'hifReinforced·Concrefe ~Shop Welding Material/Equipment: Weather: w CHRISTIAN WHEELER. 0 Pre-Stressed Concrete 0 Field Welding ENGINEERING Architect· Engineer 0 Reinforced Masonry 0 Fireproofing PkmFile# ~Geotechnicol Hours Charged: erved is, to the best of my knowledge, in compliance ·with the opp oved plans and specifications. Date 4925 Mercury Street + San Diego, CA 92111 + 619-496-9760 + FAX ~Of ~l8fad .,v Weather: Date !N CHRISTIAN WHEELER. D Pre-Stressed Concrete 0 Field Welding ENGINEERING Time Departed, Engineer 0 Reinforced Masonry 0 Fireproofing served is, to the best of my knowledge, in compliance with the approved plans and specifications. Plan File#. 4925 Mercury Street+ San Diego, CA 92111 + 619-496-9760 + FAX 619-496-9758 ,, ...... DAILY. REPORT Subcontractor ~ Reinforced Concrete 0 Shop Welding !N CHRISTIAN WHEELER ENGINEERING 0 Pre-Stressed Concrete 0 Field Welding Time Departed, 0 Reinforced Masonry 0 Fireproofing Plan File# 0 Geotechnical D Hours Charged, Unless noied otherwise, the work observed is, to the best of my knowledge, in compliance with the approved plans and specifications. ___ ...,~UL...!1/:q....l/~==..&::.,:;;;..;,,:,:::: ______ X.....,t8a.OVJ*-!!!:-16'2.fl1,:z.3-e.& __________ __,__ _______ ---- Technician'sSigna;;;• ~ Reg.# su:perintendent's Signature Date Technician {Print or T e) 4925 Mercury Street+ San Diego, CA 92111 + 619-496-9760 + FAX 619-496-9758 DAILY REPORT Subcontractor IX! Reinforced Concrete 0 Shop Welding Material/Equipment: . -,tS G.l?. '"° Date Time Arrived: !N CHR.ISTIAN WHEELER. D Pre-Stressed Concrete 0 Field Welding ENGINEER.ING Time Departed: Pennit# D Reinforced Masonry D Fireproofing Plan File# 0 Geotechnical o ________ _ Hours Charged: .o Unless noted otherwise, the work observed is, to the best of my knowledge, in compliance with the approved plans and specifications. ~-~~~~.,,__,_,.~a-.o~~-~_.:e...--=='----------~:r="~Bo~ ~ 102"223· .... a~s'---------------------- T~chnklcm's~~ Reg, # Superintendent's Signature Date Technician Print or T pe) 4925 Mercury Street+ San Diego, CA 92111 + 619-496-9760 + FAX 619-496-9758 DAILY REPORT Project Name Project Address Subcontractor 0 Reinforced Concrete 0 Shop Welding Time Arrived: !N CHR.ISTIAN WHEELER. 0 Pre-Stressed Concrete 0 Field Welding E N G I N E E R. I N ·G Time Departed: Permit# Architect ~11'\\T}l Engineer II 181 Reinforced Masonry 0 Fireproofing :oo Plan File# 0 Geotechnical D Hours Charged: O, 01>1i \"1 111'\f' ON Unless noted otherwise, the work observed is, to the best of my knowledge, in compliance with the approved pla~s and specifications. __ __:..1< ...... 4-#-1, _J~l<!m!<.-"1'=--=-----~:tc.=80"'-'.'-102C,'1l$-:. Technician's Signa{;}';~ Reg.# Superintendent's Signature Technician (Print or T e) 4925 Mercury Street+ San Diego, CA 92111 + 619-496-9760 + FAX 619-496-9758 Date !N CHRISTIAN WHEELER. ENGINEl;RING DAILY REPORT Plan File# {Sr.Reinforced Concrete • r'.TS~op Welding Material/Equipment: Weather: Time Departed: Unless noted otherwise, the work observed is, to the best of my'knowledge, in compliance with the approve,,d __ ~A z.pk Reg.# Technician (Print'or T pe) • 4925 Mercury Street + San Diego, CA 92111 + 619-496-9760 + My'f ~J-kJ ,...,, .. f !N CHRISTIAN WHEELER. ENGINEERING Unless noted otherwise, the work observed is, to the best of my knowledge, in compliance with the approved plans and specificati ns. 7/2b echnic,an' ignature Reg.# 9.¥.ien. Technician (Print or T 4925 Mercury Street+ San Diego, CA 92111 + 619-496-9760 + FAX 619-496-9758 l ""' .f DAILY REPORT Project Name ""'" .,.,,a., 4'...1'11 i::. a,"'-\ 1\\\Cr ""'" '"'~P 3 Project Address \'rnu;. ,:..,.--=-~~ , .. Oi\AI\, 'Conti-actor .... a.,_, ,-t\ j\11 I ••t,ol .. -bu11 l\~C Subcontractor S\l!:RRA c:rt::EL. w CHR.ISTIAN WHEELER. ENGINEERING Project# 1QQ.§A'2. Permit# i'.R Qcn..&.t I Architect fr ~lnl ""''1.e. .. ,.,, 11.\l. A.0/'ll Engineer DDlMC ffl.\ltlUll~, a,,. I Plan File# D Epoxy Anchors 0-Reinfarced Concrete . 0 Shop Welding D Pre-Stressed Concrete !RI Field Welding D Reinforced Masonry D Fireproofing o ________ _ Material/Equipment, Weather: Date Time Arrived, I Time Departed, eq~M I Hours Charged, -," .fl Unless noted otherwise, the work observed is, to the best af my knowledge, in compliance with the approved plans and specifications. :l ~ ::t:. T,.&)¼t IO!l,l23-~ _: ~,. . lnspector/Technin'sSignature Reg,# Su'Gpintem ent's Signaiure . P0'8l t't)tllS JC ~::ft-99 Date Inspector /Technician (Print or Type) 49i5 Mercury Street + San Diego,' CA 92111 + 858-496-9760 + FAX 858-496-9758 Contractor Subcontractor C, ~ Reinforced Concrete 0 Shop Welding Material/Equipment: Weather: ,!~I JIU CHRISTIA\! WHEELER ENG11'EERING :/ Time Depart,-d, · 1 Hours Chargud: 4925 Mcrcu(y Street+ San Diego, CA 92111 + 619-496-9760 + FAX 619-496-975!! Date ,_,,-. 'i, w CHR.ISTIAN WHEELER. ENGINEER.ING COMPR~SSIVE STRENGTH TEST RESULTS Job Name: Job Address: Contractor: Subcontractor: Test Location: Callaway Building #1 Dust Collector 2285 Rutherford Road, Carlsbad Nielsen Dillingham Construction Certified Concrete F6 Footings . ----~'I Req. Strength: ---250P,pii' ----··-.... :;,; Date Sampled: · 9-27-99 Date Received: 9-29-99 Sampled by: DH tested ):>y: TP Sample Type: Concrete, 6" x 12" Sample# Date Tested Age (days) 2934 10-4-99 7 2935 10-25-99 28 2936 10-25-99 28 Job#: Permit#: Architect: Engineer: Supplier: Mix#: Admixture(s): Tru.ck#: Mix'l'emp: Slump: Min in Mixer: Area (sq. inches) 28.27 - 28.36 28.36 199.542 CB992411 Plan File#: Smith Consulting Architects Prime Structural Engineers Hanson Ticket#: Air Temp: 4" %Air: 60 Unit Wt: Maximum Load Comp. Strength (lbs) (psi) 67,330 2,380 91,370 3,220 83;060 --z~--m Failure Type .. .. The sampling, handling, cunng and compressive strength testmg were performed by Christian Whei;!ler Engmeenng m accordance with the applicable ASTM standards. No other warranties express or implied. Distribution: (2) -Callaway Golf (1) Smith Consulting Architects (1) City of Carlsbad Reviewed by: 4925 Mercury Street + San J?iego, CA 92111 + 858-496-9760 + FAX 858-496-9758 DAILY REPORT Project-Name D Reinforced Concrete D Shop Welding . -+ w CHRISTIAN WHEELER ENGINEERING D Pre-Stressed Concrete ii Field Welding -.oo Time Departed: Project# Wl·S4t Pennit# Engineer \I D Reinforced Masonry D Fireproofing 14·.10 Plan File# ~ Epoxy Anchors D Hours Charged, Unless noted otherwise, the work observed Is, to the best of my knowledge, in compliance with the approved plans and specifications. ll. ~ -1V'-.-,( .:z::_. :i::c.so ~ 101-'zi.3~ ss------=-~~---------~---------------------------------ln~ector/Technician!s Signature Reg.# Superintendent's Signature Date iw., (1\022\5 ,s::. Inspector Technician (Print or Type) 4925 Mercury Street -+ San D-iego, CA 9.2111 + 858-496-9760 + FAX 858-496-9758 DAILY REPORT Subcontractor L. D Reinforced Concrete D Shop Welding Date Time Arrived: WO ~00 w CHRISTIAN WHEELER. D Pre-Stressed Concrete ~ Field Welding ENGINEl;RING Time Departed: Engineer \II\'£ ;flt»Cf\l~I., & D Reinforced Masonry D Fireproofing Plan File# D Epoxy Anchors D Hours Charged: ,f Unless noted otherwise, the work observed is, to the best of my knowledge, in compliance with. the approved plans and specifications. Inspector/Technician's Signature Reg.# Superintendent's Signature Inspector Technician (Print or Type) 4925 Mercury Street-+ San Diego, CA 92111-+: 858-496-9760-+ FAX 858-496-9758 Date ) DAILY REPORT Project Name D Reinforced Concrete D Shop Welding Date Time Arrived: w CHR.ISTIAN WHEELER. ENGINEERING 3 D Pre-Stressed Concrete ~ Field Welding Time Departed: Project# D Reinforced 'Masonry D Fireproofing l • L Plan File# D Epoxy Anchors o ________ _ Hours Charged: g 0 Unless noted otherwise, the work observed is, to the best of my knowledge, in compliance with the approved plans and specifications. _ __,,12."-".%.. . ..6<,;fJ;/,ffJd~""""'"'----"'r=--,---------nl->£"'Bo ....... ~ 1oz,u3 .. ,s ___________________ _ Inspector/Techr/cl~Mgnature , Reg.# Superintendent's Signature Date ---. 1toGC;R l'\02«15 .lt:.. Inspector Technician {Prfnt or Type) 4925 Mercury Street'+ San Diego, CA 92111 + 858-496-9760 + FAX 858-496-9758 w CHRISTIAN WHEELER ENGINEERING COMPRESS-IVE STRENGTH TEST RESULTS Job Name: Callaway Building #1 Dust Collector Job Address: \ 2285 RutherforQR~ Carlsbad Contractor: Subcontractor: Test Location: Req. Strength: Date Sampled: Date Received: Sampled by: Tested by: Sample Type: , Sampl~# · 3121 3122 .3123 3124 Nielsen Dillingham Construction Certified Concrete · Raised Slab South End 2500psi 10-15-99 10-16-99 SC TP Concrete, 6" x 12" Date Tested Age (days) 10-22-99 7 11-12-99 28 11-12-99 28 Discarded I Job#: Permit#: Architect: Engineer: Supplier: Mix#: Admixture(s): Truck#: MixTemp: Slump: .Min i'n ·Mix.~r: 199.542 CB992411 Plan File#: Smith Consulting Architects Prime Structural Engineers Hanson 2533500 428 Ticket#: 70° Air Temp: 3¼" %Air: .30 ------. .UnitWt: .. Area-(sq. inches) · · Maximuin Load · Comp. Strength (lbs) (psi) 28.36 56,660 2,000 28.46 79,200 2,780 .. 28.46 -81,240 2,850 I 117147 68° Failure Type •· .. .. The samphng, handhng, curing and compressive strength testing were performed by Chnstian Wheeler Engmeenng m accordance with the apphcable ASTM standards. No other-warranties express or implied. · Distribution: (2) Callaway Golf (1) .Smith Consulting Architects j (1) Cify .of Car_lsbad Reviewed .by: . · Michael B. Wheeler, RCE #45358 4 9 2 5 M e r cu r y· S tr. e e t + S an D i ego , C A 9 2 1 1 1 + 8 5 8 -4 9 6 -9 7 6 0 + FA X 8 5 8 -4 9 6 -9 7 5 8 ··~· J"c, CHRISTIAN WHEELER. ENGINEER.ING COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST RESULTS Job Name: Callaway Building #1 Dust Collector Job Address: \; ·2285-RutlierforcrRoad, Carlsbad ------·--- Contractor: Supcontractor: Test.Location: Req. Strength: Date Sampled: Date Received: Sampled by: Tested by: Sample Type: Sample# 2937 2938 2939 Nielsen Dillingham Construction Certified Concrete Spread Footings 2500 psi 9-29-99 9-30-99 RM TP Concrete, 6" x 12" Date Tested· Age (days) 10-6-99 7 10-27-99 28 10-27-99 28 Job#: Permit#: Architect: Engineer: Supplier: Mix#: Admixture(s): Truck#: Mix Temp: Slump: Min in Mixer: Area (sq. inches) 28.27 28.46 28.46 199.542 CB992411 Plan File#: Smith Consulting Architects Prime Structural Engineers Hanson 3033500 390 Ticket#: 87° Air Temp: 6" %Air: UnitWt: Maximum Load Comp. Strength (lbs) (psi) 58,570 2,070 79,220 2,780 81,670 2,870 83° Failure Type .. The sampling, handling, curing and compressive strength testing were performed by Chnst1an Wheeler Engineenng m accordance with the applicable ASTM standards. No other warranties express or implied. Distribution: (2) Callaway Golf (1) Smith Consulting Architects (1) City of Carlsbad Reviewed by: Michael B. Wheeler, RCE #45358 4 9 2.5 M e r c u r y S tr e e t -+-S a n D i e g o , C A 9 2 1 1 1 -+-8 5 8 -4 9 6 -9 7 6 0 -+-F A X 8 5 8 -4 9 6 -9 7 5 8 !ii CHR.ISTIAN WHEELER. ~NGINEERING COMPRESSIVE STRENGTI:I TEST RESULTS Job Name: Job Address: Contractor: Subcontractor: T~st Location: Req. Strength: Date Sampled: Date Received: Sampled .by: Tested by: Sample Type: Sample# 2863 2864 2865 Callaway Building #1 Dust Collector 2285 Rutherford Road, ·Carlsbad Nielsen Dillingham Construction Certified Concrete Masonry Wall O -4' O" 2000psi 9-30-99 10-1-99 RM TP Grout, 3" x 3" x 6" .; Date Tested Age (days) 10-7-99 7. 10-28-99 28 10-28-99 28 Job#: Permit#: Architect: Engineer: Supplier: Mix#: Admixture(s): Truck#: Mix Temp: Slump: Min in Mixer: Area (sq. inches) 9.0 9.0 9.0 199.542 CB992411 Plan File#: Smith Consulting Architects Prime Structural Engineers Superior 866P. 536 Ticket#: 84° Air Temp: 7-9" %Air: 83 UnitWt: Maximum Load Comp. Strength {lbs) (psi) 12,690 1,410 19,460 2,160 18,420 2,050 153238 90° Failure Type .. The sampling, handling, curing and ·compressive strength testing were performed by Christian Wheeler _Engmeenng m accordance with the applicable ASTM standards. No other warranties express or implied. Distribution: (2) Callaway Golf (1) Smith Consulting eArchitects (1) City of Carlsbad Reviewed by, · Michael B. Wheeler, RCE #45358 4925· Mercury Street+ San Diego, CA 9,2111 + 858-496-9760 + FAX 858-496-9758 ' '' CHR.ISTIAN WHEELER. ENGINEERING COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TES'!' RESULTS Job Name: Job Address: Contractor: Subcontractor: Test Location: Req. Strength: Date Sampled: Date Received: Sampled by: Tested by: $ample Type: Sample# 3364 336!:i 3366 3367 Callaway Building #1 Dust Collector 2285 Rutherford Road, Carlsbad Nielsen Dillingham Construction Certified Concrete Concn;te Filler Around Columns 3000 psi 10-29-99 11-1-99 AC TP Concrete, 6" x 12" Date Tested Age (days) 11-5-99 7 11-29-99 31 11-29-99 31 Discarded Job#: Permit#: Architect: Engineer: Supplier: Mix#: Admixture(s): Truck#: Mix Temp: Slump: Min in Mixer: Area (sq. inches) 28.27 28.27 28.27 199.542 CB992411 Plan File#: Smith Consulting Architects Prime Structural Engineers ' Superior 3033500 544 Ticket#: Air Temp: 3" %Air: UnitWt: Maximum load Comp. Strength (lbs) (psi) 66,280 2,340 84,810 3,000 89,010 3,150 124144 Failure Type ·--.. The-sampling, handling, cunng and compress1v~ strength testing were performed by Christian Wheeler Engmeermg m accordance with the applicable ASTM standards. No other warranties express or implied. Distribution: (2) Callaway Golf (1) Smith Consulting Architects (1) City of Carlsbad Reviewed by: Michael B. Wheeler, RCE #45358 4925 Mercury Street + San Diego, CA 92111 + 858-496-9760 + FAX 858-496-9758 June 18, 1999 Callaway Golf 2285 Rutherford Road Carlsbad, California 92008 Attention: Bryan Tremble w CHRISTIAN WHEELER ENGINEERING CWE 199.350.1 SUBJECT: SITE PREPARATION AND FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS, PROPOSED DUST COLLECTOR, 2785 RUTHERFORD ROAD, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA. Ladies and Gentlemen: In accordance with your request, this report has been prepared to present site preparation and foundation recommendations for a proposed dust collector, to be installed at the rear of the existing Callaway building located at 2285 Rutherford Road, in Carlsbad, California. The dust collector will be constructed in an area that is currently part of a depressed truck dock. We understand that a small retaining wall will be constructed to separate the construction from the rest of the truc:k dock, in order to' bring up the grade to match the building floor grade. Imported fill material will be placed and compacted in order to attain the proposed grade. The site plan presented on Plate Number· 1 shows the configuration of the property and the location of the proposed dust collector. SCOPE OF SERVICES The scope of our services was limited to review of available geotechnical documents for the · subject site and adjacent sites, and the preparation of this report. Various geotechnical 4925 Mercury Street + San Diego, CA 92111 + 619-496-9760 + FAX 619-496-9758 . 'rr·Z~l If !". CWE 199.350.1 June 18, 1999 Page No. 2 reports prepared specifically for the subject property by San Diego Soils Engmeering, Inc., and grading plans on file with the City of Carlsbad were reviewed as pp.rt of our investigation. We also reviewed ·several geotechnical reports prepared for previous additions to several of the Callaway buildings in the general area. These reports were prepared by the undersigned while employed by Southern California Soil and Testing; Inc. SITE DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY The subject property was developed in about 1985 as part of the Carlsbad Research Center and supports a large manufacturing and office building. The property is relatively level and drains by sheet flow towards the street in front of the lot. Parking lots exist on ~ree sides of the· building. The existing truck dock is located at the rear of the building and is large enough for three trucks to dock. The dock slopes downward towards the building and is depressed about 3.5 feet below the building floor slab. The d'?ck area is paved with concrete pavement. A trench drain to remove water from the depressed dock is located in the depressed area next to the building. The original grading involved cuts and fills of less than. about five feet from the origmal contours. San Diego Soils Engineering, Inc. provided the observation and compaction testing during grading. The cut portion of the pad is beli~ved to have been undercut by about three feet and backfilled with compacted fill material. SOIL CONDITIONS Based on our research and experience in the area, the soils in the upper approximately three feet consist of medium stiff, very moist, highly expansive, silty clay. This material has refatively low to moderate strength parameters. The fill is underlain at a relatively shallow depth by very stiff to hard, sandy, silty clay of the Santiago Formation. This material has relatively high strength parameters in its natural state but is moderately to highly expansive. CWE 199.350.1 June 18, 1999 Page No. 3 CONCLUSIONS ANO RECOMMENDATIONS GENERAL: Based on our research and experience in the general vicinity of the site, it is our professional opinion that the dust ~ollector may be constructed as proposed provided the following recommendations are complied with. SITE PREPARATION: The existing concrete pavement may be left in-place or may be removed. If left in-place, a layer of fl)ter fabric such as Mira:fi 140N should be placed over the existing trench drain at the low point of the truck dock Where the existing concrete pavement will interfere with new foundations, it should be removed. Where the retaining wall will be constructed, the concrete pavement should be saw-cut and removed to allow the construction of the retaining wall foundation. RETAINING WALL: The foundation for the retaining wall may consist of a conventional spread footing, founded on the fill material that underlie the site. The foundation should have a minimum depth of 12 inches below the concrete pavement and may be designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 2000 pounds per square foot. The footing excavation should be observed by a member of our engineering or geology staff to verify that the soil conditions are as we anticipated in the preparation o_f this report. The wall should be designed using an equivalent fluid pressure of 30 pounds per cubic foot. Passive resistance may be assumed as 300 pounds per square foot per foot of depth. The coefficient of friction of concrete to soil may be assumed to be 0.30. A subdrain is no~ required for this wall. FILL PLACEMENT: The fill material used to bring the depressed ·truck area up to the grade of the building pad will need to be imported. The fill should consist of a nondetrimentally expansive, sandy soil, preferably decomposed granitics. All fill material to be imported should be approved by a member of our engineering staff prior to importing to the site. The fill can be placed directly on the existing concrete pavement or on the.subgrade under the pavement. No ground preparation other that compacting any subgrade soils disturbed by removing the concrete pavement is expected to be necessary. The fill should be placed in thin lifts and each lift should be compacted to at least 90 percent of its ~WE 199.350.1 June 18, 1999 Page No. 4 mmcimum dry density as determined by ASTM D 1557-91. The fill material should be tested by Christian Wheeler Engineering to verify proper compaction. DUST COLLECTOR FOUNDATIONS: The dust collector may be supported by conventional spread footings founded a minimum of 12 inches_ below adjacent finish grade. Continuous footings and square footings should have a minimum width of 12 ap.d 24 inches, respectively. The footings may be designed for an allowable soil b1;aring pressure of 2500 poll!lds per square foot. This pressure may be increased by one-third for wind and/ or seismic loads. Anticipated settlement for the foundations is expected to be less than one-half inch. CLOSURE If yoµ have any questions after reviewing this report, please do not hesitate to contact our office. This opportunity to be of professional service is sincerely appreciated. Respectfully submitted, CHRISTIAN WHEELER ENGINEERING ~~ Charles H. Christian, RGE # 00215 Cc: (2) Addressee ( 4) Smith Consulting Architects \ \ \ . -REFERENCE SITE PLAN JIJJ:•W' n~ r.§ .. : -- ro ... ·-- =:I I I -1 Christian Wheeler Engineering Job Numbe.r: 199.350 Date: June 21, 1999 Plate Number: 1 .~ ,, . _j_'· r,--:::::----,-------: ................... , = ....................... ,==--r--=,=,.,__ ...... -.... ~~~·i::··· :l-----0) I\_ _ I \_ ~ ---t---1-.!:::11-_ , .. ; -------i I '\ l! . 1 I q i ~ , 1 : ·,~",~ I L I• 1,. I I =~ iii !'. I I ~ 1 , ,....-----,I I ,,,.,.~ .... j /,,,, l' '\ I / I ---I \ I i~.... I /,,,, '\I \I !11 1 / /. ,I ~ 111 I 1 ~I ,I { ~---~ .~ -' \_ l! ! I r -----, ~ - Ua~,.----.. ··---1 ! ! ! I I I c 1-~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ i I I I I ~-~ I I I I I I I I : l L _____ .J ' .. I ~ \, \. \ \ '\ ' \ \ rt. \ \ "\ . . _ __la\ T--~_:K1_ .... _ .... _ ............ _, .... = .... = .... = ... ir+---->,,;;/ ''< ,--t:1r-=-=--=1:~i----:-~. - l ·1 ~ > \ / \ / \ / \ // l -i - 3 \ ./ \../ 1 , .LAJ •..•. DUST COLLECTOR FLOOR PLAN >t a n~ ,, Christian Wheeler Engineering JobNumb~: 199.350 Date: June 21, 1999 Plate Number: 2 ·" REFERENCES San Diego Soils Engineering, Inc., "Foundation Investigation, Carlsbad Research Center, Lots 15 and 16, Tract 81-10, Carlsbad, California", datedMay 7, 1984. San Diego Soils Engineering, Inc., "Addend~ Foundation Investigation, Carlsbad Research Center, Lots 15 and 16, Tract 81-10, Carlsbad, California", dated October 12, 1984. San Diego Soils Engineering, Inc., "Grading Plan Review, Carlsbad Research Center, Lot 15, Tract · 81-10, Carlsbad, California", datedNovember 26, 1984. San Diego ·soils Engineering, Inc., "Soils Compaction Report/Foundation and Slab Recommendations, Fine Grading Completed, Carlsbad Research Center, Lot 15, Tract 81-10, Carlsbad, California"" dated February 27, 1985. Southern California Soil and Testing, Inc., "allowable Soil Bearing Pressure, Brock Building Enclosure, 5957 Landau Court, Carlsbad, California", SCS&T 9511251, Report Number 1, dated December 15, 1995. Southern California Soil and Testing, Inc., "Report of Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Seltzer Building North, Phase II Modifications, 5931 Priestly Drive, Carlsbad, California", SCS&T 9511252, Report Number 2, dated April 29, 1996. Christian Wheeler Engineering Job Number: 199.350 Date: June 21, 1999 Plate Number: 3 - I ,. I' I I· • I I I ~ T ,, I n I -,, .·1 I I I et l I I ,.. ' I ' . ·1. i I· ( I· CALLAWAY GOLF TECHNICAL REPORT San Diego, CA Dearborn, Ml Atlanta, GA ToMES, VAN RickLEy & AssociATEs I September 13, 1995 I Richard Merk Vice President of Planning and Operations CALLOWAY GOLF I 2285 Rutherford Road Carlsbad, CA 92008 I Subject: Fire And Life Safety Report For The Proposed Dust Collection System For Callaway Golf- Rutherford Production I Dear Mr. Merk Tomes, Van Rickley & Associates (TVA), has reviewed the plans and documents for the proposed installation I of the dust collection system for Callaway Golf-Rutherford Production. Based on the findings of this report, TV A recommends approval of Callaway Golfs proposed dust collection system by the local authorities having .1 jurisdiction. After meeting separately with Mr. Glen Adamek, Mechanical Engineer for the Esgil Corporation, · and Mr. Pat Kelly, Building Official for the City of Carlsbad, the consensus for this report is to address minimum requirements for the particular use of titanium, graphite and stainless steel by Callaway Golf, and to I compare their operations and use of these materials to the appropriate level of fire and life safety risk that they represent. The amounts of dust created by the production process involving the cutting and polishing operations is minimal. It is the intent of this report to equate the fire and life safety risk of dust produced to that compared I with flammable constituents that are less than 25 percent of their lower flammability level (LFL). 1991 Edition 0/The Uniform Mechanical Code (UMC) I The 1991 edition of the Uniform Mechanical Code (UMC), Chapter 11, sets forth minimum requirements for the installation of ventilation systems and product-conveying systems. Section 1105. (a) General, includes the 1· following requirements: I "Ducts conveying explosives or flammable vapors, fumes or dusts shall extend directly to the exterior of the building without entering other spaces. Exhaust ducts shall not extend into or through ducts and plenums." 1· The exception in the UMC to this requirement is as follows: I I I "EXCEPTION: Ducts conveying vapors or fumes having flammable constituents less than 25 percent of their lower flammability limit (LFL) may pass through other spaces." 8265-A VickERs STREET• SAN DiEqo, CA 92111 • TEl (619) 576-6466 • FAx (619) 576-6465 I . ·1 r I ·1 r- I ; ' I I "'' a1 ,1 ./ I f I; ,., I I I I Richard Merk CALLOWAY GOLF Technical Report September 13, 1995 Page Two 1991 Edition OfThe Un}formBuildingCode (UBC) The 1991 edition of the Uniform Building Code, Table No. 9-A, allows an aggregate quantity of 1 pound of combustible dust in use and storage for every 1,000 cubic feet of space. This includes the use of open and closed systems. The proposed dust collection system is designed to provide approximately 1,220 cubic feet of space within the main exhaust duct. This exhaust duct is approximately 224 feet in length, with a tapered diameter of 44, 40 and 36 inches. The system operates at 44,000 cubic feet per minute, which will provide 36 air changes per minute throughout the duct system. A water collection system is also part of the design. While monitoring the existing system for one hour during peak operations, the maximum amount of dust produced and subsequently collected, was 8.1 pounds. It should be noted that this amount was in the form of wet sludge, which included the additional weight of the retained water. Therefore, the maximum amount of dust produced and collected within the duration of one minute, converts to less than 0.14 lb. With 36 complete air changes every minute, there is never a time when the entire duct system will contain more than 0.14 lb. of dust, which is far below the allowable amount of 1 pound. Equating The Level Of Fire And Life Safety Risk Titanium and graphite are both classified by the National Fire Protection Association (NFP A) as combustible. However, the size and shape of the metal determine, to a great extent, whether or not it will ignite. Tests have shown that very thin chips and fine turnings of titanium could be ignited by a match and heavier chips and turnings by a Bunsen burner. Coarse chips and turnings 1/32 by 3/28 inch (0. 79 by 2. 7mm) or larger are difficult to ignite. Callaway Golf's production operations create small amounts of titanium dust, which will not ignite spontaneously. Finely divided titanium in the form of dust clouds (including layers) does not ignite spontaneously, which differs in this respect from zirconium, plutonium, and certain other metals. In fact, ignition temperatures of titanium dust clouds in the air range from 630 to 1,090°F (332 to 588°C) and of titanium dust layers from 720 to 950°F (382 to 510°C). It has been found under test conditions that spontaneous ignition will only take place in pure oxygen at pressures of at least 350 psi. If the oxygen was diluted, and the required pressure increased, no spontaneous heating would occur in oxygen concentrations less than 3 5 percent. With oxygen comprising about 21 percent of our atmosphere and with a nonnal atmospheric pressure of 14. 70 psi, the level of fire risk from spontaneous combustion virtually does not exist. Also, NFP A lists the auto ignition temperature of titanium at 860°F. Concerning graphite, it is incompatible with chlorinetrifluoride, fluorine and potassium superoxide. It reacts at 300°F with potassium, sodium, rubidium and cesium to give intercalation compounds. These compounds ignite in air and may react explosively with water. Fortunately, none of these hazardous conditions mentioned above exist at the Callaway Golf facility. Between generating small amounts of dust from the production operations and having a collection system that is designed to handle a much greater load than exists, there simply is not enough combustible dust to warrant any serious concerns. I I ·1 I . I I r I- I H I i 1' i I: I fi I: I :• I- I I 1· Richard Merk CALLOWAY GOLF Technical Report September 13, 1995 Page Three Visual Inspections Of Inside Duct System Equally important is complying with the maintenance requirements. In particular, continual visual inspections of the inside of the ducting system must be performed to prevent any unsafe buildup of combustible dust. The staff at Callaway Golf checks the ducting weekly and take pictures of each inspection, which are filed with the facilities inspection records. Samples of the pictures taken of the inside of the existing duct system are attached in chronological order, dating from the present back to December of 1994. These pictures clearly demonstrate the effectiveness of the collection system, by· how clean and free of dust the inside walls appear. From December of 1994 to the present, each picture shows how exceptionally clean the system remains. The maintenance program alone provides ·an immediate means to monitor the performance of the system for efficiency and safety. (SEE ATTACHED PHOTOS.) Conclusion Because of the positive fire and life safety issues mentioned above, together with the exceptional recovery capabilities of the proposed dust collection system, TV A strongly recommends approval by the local authorities having jurisdiction. TV A equates Callaway Golfs use of titanium, graphite and stainless steel to a fire and life safety risk equal to or less than flammable constituents that are less than 25 percent of their lower flammability limit (LFL), which complies with the Exception, in Section 1105. (a) Should you have any questions or comments with regard to the findings in this report, please contact me at this office, (619) 576-6466. Respectfully Submitted, Tomes, Van Rickley Associates Michael J. Chillinsky Senior Consultant, Legal Services C: Mark Lagan -Smith Consulting Architects H:\general\~alloway\techrpt.doc . 1:. ~ I ,:-- I " I •; l I : Photographs I n I- ,-· I I I I I I I I I 11 11 ii 'I r1 r, I r1 r1 I f -I ·1 -I PHOTOGRAPHIC INSPECTION RECORD OF DUST COLLECTION SYSTEM AT CALLAWAY GOLF L Photograph # 1 Photograph # 3 I Ar o~LDe uJAL'-WX>l<-t~ltc ~ ~ Gf2..Lt()'D l Db l< H-J_ 8 R/ rt:') t<t::> ~ { z.&j ~ ~ Rvrf-1-r~faf<.j) lr-JStD<S \3ul L\)I~~ L-<5oKL~~ ou'T ID t:>.C., J_ A Photograph # 2 Photograph # 4 -~·:_ ~--.-.::~~:(":?'.J .. (':;\~?~.,\/<-'/ . . _. ··Y .•. ·,, I ~ I I I I I r-- I·. ". *' f l Ii 0 • 1: f ' I· I ,, I r I- f I- I I· PHOTOGRAPHIC INSPECTION RECORD OF DUST COLLECTION SYSTEM AT CALLAWAY GOLF ... ;--·, , , '. ·,: .. ,.; ' Photograph # 5 Photograph # 7 > ' '' " : ; ~, ' I ' L.telc.L~to 1bJJA6(j)~ spociu..s i Photograph # 6 Photograph# 8 :J.3 3 -I "'' I r, 11 1: 1~ PHOTOGRAPHIC INSPECTION RECORD OF DUST COLLECTION SYSTEM AT CALLAWAY GOLF --~-~~~~--'· ... ,· .. Photograph # 9 Photograph # 11 ~H-P. PT Roe IF-I\ .• ~/ fo62-Q> i f-,_eof<:15 ·, ··t 3B I l:-::: .. ' . , .... Photograph # 10 Photograph# 12 -- 1 # I ' ' 1· :-, I· < ' 1- 1: Ii 'f Ii PHOTOGRAPHIC INSPECTION RECORD OF DUST COLLECTION SYSTEM AT CALLAWAY GOLF tft;JS r DE--1:-/-Li A)~ C:I 4/:__t \ A-r p fLD 13&-. uf ~%'\ ·-. ' -------______ ,.. ____ -------- Photograph # 13 Photograph # 15 4 Rf-fZ--1 -s,r:. 't-5°' ~ BE-DD l--\001C-tf--~(~b/15" Photograph# 14 Photograph # 16 I . I I ~ I F' n 11 t fi • . ' ,~ I· I- PHOTOGRAPHIC INSPECTION RECORD OF DUST COLLECTION SYSTEM AT CALLAWAY GOLF :r~ -- "',;..l:-~,:_. :~., ·_~,'.-~ .. 'B!ic. ' ' - ;~-:-~ AT f)LA!UK Ar TI-f -tt:.~ Photograph # 17 Ph6tograph.'# 19 i ~ ·1 I I 4T qo0 Al e-~ 0 or 'D0CT 0)0 l~ Cb(lt.0 DLDCe ~ Photograph # 18 Photograph # 20 . .;~,.1 ' -l I ffrlt-\E: .'< .})':ll 'f(Zo°'-'\.. µ.{.\ \ ~ TO 'B(?A~Cd 4 DRDP ! \\ Be_~I'. ¥,, t,, 'TD<&-1 i {() ; ti?-8 4--'{; I-/ V /JW. Hu~~'l / <?;/1._r-P/i;As LA le~ ? ( 10 Bl1rF<-0:2 g 1/ i/z rr,/15-· :1 ... I I I- -:..;;. I i ,., I I f ·I 7 ·I I ~ I PHOTOGRAPHIC INSPECTION RECORD OF DUST COLLECTION SYSTEM AT CALLAWAY GOLF I'-<, '·I'. LrotLLtv<=-· A-T"" ~ wA'< &:,Lt)C,.,, 'Tb L.A-Tt+C-"W ~-s 0\ 1 / ~ 1 80~1 :f;p-1 ~rr t rz,-\. fA-5Cltl Photograph# 21 Photograph # 23 ·' · .. ', .. -.. ·. "7 Hu;vft~ Cjc)° puc.1 A-r Co r...L eroa Photograph# 22 Photograph # 24 I r I ,, I· ' I PHOTOGRAPHIC INSPECTION RECORD OF DUST COLLECTION SYSTEM AT CALLAWAY GOLF Photograph # 25 Photograph# 27 ~ (.~D OF Lt0E:.. ~ SC)t-JD) BA s lc:--rA'-S ff 0 4-, l , ¾, 3 <p{~'S( A:c-- . 'SA l\,,lE AS :t\-S-- Ce? A s C' /\c '-"I:, I -z. (,,, I <j .j Photograph # 26 Photograph # 28 I " I ,. I I· r I q I i r, I :' I I I. PHOTOGRAPHIC INSPECTION RECORD OF DUST COLLECTION SYSTEIH AT CALLAWAY GOLF ' MAI 0'7~ 00lt0& 1'00lc"t t+ __ y:1+s~_f:r~ ____ t11-z ,;15 ___ _ __ Photograph # 29 Photograph # 31 ·.-: .t:' :··. JA AT T+-\·t: ~L1bG-- bA· TE- +f.\,SCA-L 1§ (~ .. b( q ':[ r ,', •• ,,._ .. l ::" T f / -;0" &2L\F-.K t--/ l I AJG: TO SAIL)D L.,'/Jf'bL4STC--te5 ~ . rASC4L '?5/-zrc(c;s Photograph # 30 Photograph# 32 • ' • T t~ . ·-,~~<-"·"- fA-5Clll 8/z6/?> ({)(}75/t(-- ;I .. ;&~ 1 ' .,,, § I PHOTOGRAPHIC INSPECTION RECORD OF DUST COLLECTION SYSTEM AT CALLAWAY GOLF I .1 I I I I I I I I I I .I ii -.............. J. Photograph # 33 Photograph # 35 .. ·-·· .. ----· ·--·-·----------' Photograph # 34 Photograph # 36 MA11J ~c.T TowA(lt> zA ou,,-"o~..,,c,~11 7-1.'f-'t5 I I I I I ( I ff/OTOGRAPHJC INSPECTION RECORD OF DUST COLLECTION SYSTEIH AT . CALLAWAY GOLF . -. MAit-i t)UtT -f'oll Af'O 1-/li1r o~T co1.,c-ecn>a 7-1.,.,s Photograph # 37 Photograph # 39 MA,..a over 1"btlllf20 JS "'°1>ucr,o~ Att.eA 1-2,-,~ ; ! j ·. I 1 J J ; 1 i .) ,'-,; I __ -·-----·-----------~-------- t.,1r1tJ r,ucr -rowA~C? U Wowc,-no~ lc(I.SP. .-1~~1-4£ Photograph # 38 Photograph # 40 -------···· ----· .... . .. "AuJ bcr 'fOIIIAIIO ~~ bu4'1 _ ~f;,1"0fl 1-2., -GJ6 I I ·1 I ( I I 1· ;' I ,- 1 f : Ii I r I @ • I r·· I 'f. I· I I • I i 1. I PHOTQGRAPHJC INSPECTION RECORD OF DUST COLLECTION SYSTEA1 AT CALLAWAY GOLF ·-------------·---~ ··-- fJi?t,IAIN ~ -r1*fAtlO :3r;, ~IOt-1 lctt.eA 1-2., . .,~ Photograph# 41 Photograph # 43 .. ,//H:j IYIAJN pue,-r row"tlO Access Poot2 1 · 1A 7--zq-"/~ ·,. ·.J I I l ' MAttJ OOa" TC>W~ltO ; 3JS P'~Dllc::nON Arte A . 7·2f//-9S Photograph # 42 Photograph # 44 M/rlN t,uc;, TOWAl-9 ~a:.sss Doof2 ' :a1A 7-2,-<;~ I I ' I I R • I 71 ' : I ri •.' I i ~ I I ""7 I I /l I I fl • PHOTO.GRAPHIC INSPECTION RECORD OF DUST COLLECTION SYSTEM AT CALLAWAY GOLF '·---~·,_::.,.::,t:,</::.' "·:, .. ' .''J ; ' ;;;---: .. : ,•.; , . , ' .. : : :..L __ tJ\A\'IJ c,ucr ,~w~ttc> f'1£.t>PvOT"lot-l Af!ff/t 4, 1-~'l-t:/~ Photograph # 45 Photograph# 47 I // /j / I/ ~-'./J1f._' c/.-1 '11(;,V j'!,. -I , V ----~-~~7~-;,~~:·7~~~~ .. : .\,{;;}~ &:! % t~ MP.IN p~.,-TovJMIO f'µpc,e,.,.,o t-.\ /tf PeA ~ 7-2,.q~ Photograph # 46 Photograph # 48 / ,f>,,;.JV<.. f:, , ~~ I PHOTOGRAPHIC INSPECTION RECORD OF DUST COLLECTION SYSTEM AT CALLAWAY GOLF I I I 1· ' ' 1:. i 1: ;; ' 11 ;\ 1.: 1-- 1- • , . I ;'.:::;.::.:-~(S~+~J Photograph # 49 Photograph # 51 f?c.,/_$f-/-r,tJ6 kc)c)N ZJ//C-"T' lie,· f-/0t..6---? z ~,,o rfJ r· c:JJ rtfJJ Photograph # 50 Photograph # 52 /2-/11-91/ #/ ;fh#t~~.(I~ I PHOTOGRAPHIC INSPECTION RECORD OF DUST COLLECTION SYSTEM AT CALLAWAY GOLF I· I- I-- I I . -----·---- Photograph # 53 Photograph # 55 ------·------. ; i· r· r i -l-."" i 12-/fJ -9t,I 1#8~ ,i,. -• ~ ---~ • Photograph # 54 Photograph # 56 I . PHOTOGRAPHIC IJVSPECTION RECORD OF DUST COLLECTION SYSTEM AT C4.LLAWAY GOLF Photograph# 57 f ·'' ·~~-;,"~-n~?~~~~z1-~~~··&"f~~~~~tr;~~~~~~4~Jr~.a1~~;,~~1S:;~:r~,~;1c~cl.~~~~-~-;r-1Itl~~-~;)12~~rl£\1'ft'1~f;~~~1~~ii,~~ ~ 0-- I· I·. '< ,___,__.. G/ ~af ic \ -~ [ ~5 1· {I rt 1y ~ -f r12<- 7/b/ff CC-/<-r . ' 1 B/1!3/19 c~ °I /J(q1 _9/CvrLJ @ @+='C ~ re__ krt-rJ 'i{Ltl(°i 1-j;_<;')~ a-+ '' - &l /3/ /c;r .BUILDING --Zfj/3/7 cf' .,LANNING --µ!!Ji:! ENGINE~RING 7/.2 / 72-. FIRE APPB/FORM --'~.-,,, ~ HEAL TH DEPT , HAZ MAT/ AIR QUAL -----OTHER SEWERDISTR ·l _ ____, ___ 8LDG GRADING LETTER TO APPLICANT :·: .. ::, ',,,l _____ , ______ PLANCORR ·--1·-. ENG CORR 't ,;}; .... ,.~,: ·:-~ ,:I' -----+---1-t:_ SCHOOL FORM ~-L __ 7 __ CFO FORM .u,ef.Lf-__ i _ "W-P E & M WORKSHEET _______ J _____ BLOG FEES COMPLETE ~~§?~~~3