The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2303 OCEAN ST; ; PC130030; Permit- 12-20-2016 Job Address: PermiType: P•C21No: Valultion: City of Carlsbad 1635 fsadar Av Carlsbad, CA 9DJ8 Plan Check Permit No: PC130030 Building Inspection Request Une (760) 602-2725 2303 OCE/IH ST CBAD PlJ!'I,NCK 2030101200 lot#: 0 $0.00 Constn.dion Type: status: .Applied: Entered By: PENDING 0413012013 JMA Reil'ence#: c..,-os~,~ Plan .Approved: Issued: Pmjecflille: ~ial'lt SHAWN MONTEITH #130 OCEAN STREET RESIDENCES Inspect kea: DEMO E}QST. 50 APTSBUIU> 35CONOOMtNIUMS& 0'1t11er: 2EPlfYR OCE/IH STREET INVESTORS llC 11750 SORRENTO VAU.EYRO SAN DIEGO CA 92121 858-431-5126 11750 SORRENTO VALLEY RO #130 SAN DIEGO CA 92121 Plan Chedt fee ~I fees Total fees: .... $18,000.00 $0.00 $18,000.00 TotaiPaymentsToOa1e: $18,000.00 Daimee Due: ANAL APPROVAl Date: aea-ance: IIOTICE: PMil!il!li&IIOTICEIIililllp!llllilrl,..llliBfilrt:tllills•1•!iliut"rll!es,..._!i •!I!NiliH&,cr-l!lllllia.s_•_ fWIJ II!IBn!iiiiUIS ..... Ciin&.• "AA• IIIII! !I ......... i;,..hasa..llpllft!ilillplllililllaf•l!!ii!-Ciin&. If,. plll!!l-.,.. -!l --llf'*il~!ill-ii-•CIIH8!dDI6&aDIILil•tll!• ..... •-roll!r-..illlii...U.willlllleCiiJIIiiiiii!IErlllr PDCI!!SI!illg.ilatdil.a!llliiiCiri!II•II••C•e&editBlUZ.-. Filiilllmlllill!!ly..._tllii....._lllilllur-r•.....-..-ildliull-- lll!'llil.w.!illil!!ilf. .... ,il-lll!irilpD!iiliiDB. V. iilelll!n!lly fURlltBIIIDllfiED .. ,..iglltiD ........ !ptdilll--•dliaDCE5110T IIAILYID •llriH!ii!IIBa~EdillfiiS_.Ciipill:iiJ CII .. I!S.IIIfPB~,a.ilg,g•ilgcr-!iililir iiWbllill fiUII!!!I!iilgu!illfllliaaiMS ·---... llisll'lild. IIOitDCES IT IIAil YID -r • •--• ,...._aMOll~ • • ..,a.;lll ... itl-. ·~- -/ / THE FOLLOWING APPROVALS REQUIRED PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE: la("LANNJNG ~INEERING la'BuiLDING IZ)'FIRE 0HEALTH QHAZMATIAPCD «~" Building Permit Application Plan Check No. :Pc r3 ·~3D 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008 Est. Value ~ CITY OF Ph: 760-602-2719 Fax: 760-602-8558 Plan Ck. Deposit CARLSBAD email: building@carlsbadca.gov www.carlsbadca.gov Date lf{ ?>D{ I?J jSWPPP JOB ADDRESS 2303 Ocean Street IAPN 203 -010 -12& -15 Cf/PROJECT II rOT# rHA5E; r Of ;;T5 r SEOROOM5 #BAIHHOOM5 ITQMT E r;uN81 1(. I Yl't 1 uu.;. t;HUU .. CT 05-12 VB R2&R3 DESCRIPnONOFWORK: ltlcladeSquantFeetotNJectec~Aiwll(sJ ~3 1 '-/-~/, .s p ~ ,-t::l CPodt'u~ 35 unit resldentillelrtpeet condominium project with e subterranean pa;t,;;rege on 3.05 ecm. The stacked flet condominium units erelocalld wllbln 18 two-story buildings. Units range from 2 to 3 bedrooms & 2.5 to 3.5 baths Project to Include common clublloulewllh Indoor fltneu eree, pooUspaeree, fireplt, BBQ end seating erees Private recreation spece provided for eech unit In form of patio of balcony. Perking = 2 spaces per unit+ 12 (total} guest speces incl. 5 RV spaces (82 total} EXISTING USE 1 PROPOIIED USE rARAGE (SF) PATIOS (SF) I DECKS (SF) FIREPLACE riR CONDITIONING 1 FIRE SPRINKLERS 50 apartment units 35 Luxury Condos YESIZ)I 35 Nc(J YES IZ)NoO YESIZJNoO APPLICANT NAME (Primary Contact) Shawn Monteith APPLICANT NAME (Secondary Contact) Jim Mcmenamin ADDRESS ADDRESS 11750 Sorrento Valley Rd #130 11750 Sorrento Valley Rd #130 CITY STATE ZIP CITY STATE ZIP San DieQo CA 92121 San DieQo CA 92121 PHONE PHONE 858-461-5126 rAX 858-678-8655 858-461·51 09 I FAX 858-678-8655 EMAIL EMAIL Sha=, -Pbvrpartners)w(.com Jim@...zephyrpartners-re.com PROPERTY OWNER NAME Ocean Street 8 Owners. LLC CONTRACTOR BUS. NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS 11750 Sorrento Valley Rd #130 CITY STATE ZIP CITY STATE ZIP San Di&Ao CA 92121 PHONE rAX PHONE I FAX 858-558-3650 858-878-8855 EMAIL EMAIL lnfo@zephyrpartners-re.com ·. ARCH/DESIGNER NAME & ADDRESS I STATE UC.I# STATELIC.# r~ I cnv sus. uc.# Dahlin Grouo AP 1539 S. Cedros Ave C-17751 (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions COde: Arry City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, Improve, demolish or repa1r any structure, prior to Its Issuance, also reqwres the applicant for such permit to file a slllllad statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions ofthe Contractor's License Law !Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of DIVIsion 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or that he Is exempt therefrom, and the besls for the allegad exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicantfor a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than fiVe hundred dollars {$500}). WORKERS COMPENSATION WOllin' Compenllllon Dec:llrlll011: I hefel1t slfinn under penalty of peljwy 0118 d file ~ decisnlllons: B I have and will malntlln a certificate of c0111811t to self.lniUrt for v.orkers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code. for the pelfonnance of the work tor which this pellllit is Issued. I have and will maintain wO!IIn' compenA11011. as reQUited by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the pelfol!llance of the v.ork for which this pennH is Issued. My v.olkeiS' compensation Insurance carrier and policy number am: Insurance Co. Policy No. Expiration Date-------- lbili,section need not be completed Wthe pellllit Is for0118 hundred doii81S ($100) or Jess. llJ Certlflcall of Exempt1011: I certify that In the pelformance of the WO!k for which this penni\ Is Issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the WOII<eiS' Compensation Laws of Caflfornia. WARNING: Fallurt to securt worktnl' compenA11011 cover.ge 11 uniJWful,llllllhal IUbject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to 0111 hundred thousand dollars (&100,000), In lddltiOII to the cost of compensat1011, dlmages es piO'IIdecl for In Sect1011 3706 of the Ubor code, lntenlsl and lttomey's fees. IS CONTRACTOR SIGNATURE IZJAGENT DATE OWNER-BUILDER DECLARATION I heteby allltm that I em exempt from Contr/lctor's LJcense LBw for the following reason: 0 I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the v.ork and the structum is no !Intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's ~nse Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thel800, and who does such work himseW or through his own employees, provided that such improvements ae not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or Improvement Is sold within 0118 year of completion, the owner-builder will have the bun:len of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). (ZJ I, as owner of the property, em exclusively contracting with licensed contraclols to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or Improves thel800, and contracts for such projects with contraclor{s) licensed pu1Suant to the Contractor's Ucense Law). 0 I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason: 1.1 personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. Oves Oo 2. I (have I have not) signed an application for a building pe1111H for the proposed work. 3. I have con1racted with the following person (fillll) to provide the proposed construc11on (Include name address I phone I contractors' license number): 4. I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coon:llnate, supetvlse and provide the major v.ork Onclude name I address I phone I contractoiS' license number): 5. I will provide some of the v.ork, but I have con1racted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated Qnclude name I address I phone I type of v.ork): 12)AGENT DATE -COMPLETE THIS SECTION FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMITS ONLY Is lhe appficant orfulln bUidlng occupant required to submft a business pill!, acutely hazardous materials regis1ratlon form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Acf1 CJ Yes CJ No Is lhe applicant orfulln bliklng occupant required to obtain a permit from lhe air pollution control dls1rict or air quality management district? CJ Yes CJ No Is lhe faciUty to be constructed wllhln 1,000 feet of lhe outer bounday of a school site? CJ Yes CJ No IF NfY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SEIMCES AHD 11tE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. I Clllllfylhat I,_ llld lheeppllcallan llldstalelhatlheabollelnfonnallon Is conectllld thatlhe lnbmatlon on 1he plans ls80CIIlla I &eaeiD CQ11'1111ywllh all Cilrodi&ICISIIIII StaiB laws 181at11Wto bulllng construcllon. I helel7j autJori2e representalive of 1he City of Clrlst8l b 8I1Er U!Xlfllle aboYe mentioned prqlel1y ilr ~ purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HAAMI..ESS THE CriY a= CJIRLS8AD AGAINST AU. UABILITIES, JLOOMENTS, COSTSNfJ EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN 11m WAY ACCRUE AGAINST So\10 CriY IN COOSEQUENCE a= THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OOHA: HI OSHA permit Is ~ ilr axcavations over flf! deep and demollion or conslruction of structures over 3 sbies i1 ~t EXPIRATION: Every perml issued lly 1he 8tilg Ollcial underlhe prtMsions oflhS Code shaD elqlie lly rmilliion and become nul and \\'lid if lhe buikjing or 'Mllll authorized by sudl permit is not CXll11lllellred Mhin 100days tom lhe dale ofsudl permitorlflhe bulklilg or'Mllll aullorized lly sudl permft is suspended or abandoned at any line a!Erthe 'Mllll is oommenoed ilr a period of 100days (SecOOn 100.4.4lkliform lllildi'lg Code). A! APPUCANT'S SIGNATURE DATE Inspection List CB131212 RESDNTL CONDO OCEAN ST. CONDOS: 2,504 SF LIV Date Inspection Item Inspector Act Comments 416 SF COMMON AREA / 186 SF PATIO/D Permit#: Type: 89 Final Combo PY NR09/21/2016 39 Final Electrical PY PA06/04/2015 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall PY PA01/28/2015 23 Gas/Test/Repairs PY AP12/04/2014 17 Interior Lath/Drywall PY AP10/22/2014 17 Interior Lath/Drywall PY NS10/22/2014 16 Insulation PY AP09/29/2014 84 Rough Combo PY PA09/23/2014 84 Rough Combo PY CO09/22/2014 24 Rough/Topout PY AP09/11/2014 15 Roof/Reroof PY AP08/28/2014 13 Shear Panels/HD's PY PA08/26/2014 13 Shear Panels/HD's PB AP08/22/2014 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PY NR04/28/2014 Tuesday, December 20, 2016 Page 1 of 1 PERMIT INSPECTION HISTORY REPORT (CB131212) BLDG-Residential 05/14/2013Application Date:Permit Type:Owner: Subdivision:Condo 02/25/2014Work Class:Issue Date: 2303 Ocean St Carlsbad, CA 92008 Address:11/30/2016Expiration Date:Status: IVR Number: 694238 Closed - Finaled Scheduled Date Inspection Type Inspection No.Inspection Status Primary Inspector Reinspection CompleteActual Start Date 12/08/2016 BLDG-Final Inspection 004903-2016 Passed Paul York Complete COMMENTS PassedChecklist Item BLDG-Building Deficiency Yes BLDG-Plumbing Final Yes BLDG-Mechanical Final Yes BLDG-Structural Final Yes BLDG-Electrical Final Yes December 08, 2016 Page 1 of 1 -.. '-"' Ocean Street Residences 2303 Ocean Street Carlsbad,CA Request for Information 021 Detailed, RFis Grouped by RFI Number Project t 13-030 Tel: 858-549-3920 Fax: 858-549-3994 RFI # 021 Dato Crcd!Pd 2 412014 .._ ..... ., Jonathan Shapero CRANE Holly Antillon 9605 Kearny Villa Rd I Anllii!'Uiiilfl:&'' . DAHLIN GROUP, INC. 539 S. Cedros Avenue Solana Beach, CA 92075 ~ OK· Gouvis Eng. ·---San Di~o. CA J!212~---------------------------·-· AUihor RFI Number SubJect r~es in Wells Cc: Compenr Nlme CRANE ETIVISTA CONCRETE, INC. ETIVISTA CONCRETE, INC. CRANE ETIVISTA CONCRETE, INC. CRANE CRANE Dlaclplne Structural Contact Name Dewey Davis Enzo Joe Diaz Larry Chase Mario DiCarlo Philip Crane Tony Razo 1 1 1 Date fllclulnMI: 211112014 Per structural note 22 on sheet SN-1A ties in all walls will be 1.5" clear, except at face of jamb and end of wall, which will be 2" clear per detail 13 on sheet SC-321. Please see attached sketches for layout. Date AMweNd: 211012014 The note 22. on sheet SN-1A is for rebar cover for prestressed concrete which it is not applicable in this case. We have several conversations with the detailer and they had mentioned that the reinforcing at the jamb and the corner is very tight. Structurally we can allow the clear cover to the tie to be 3/4" min. which still meet theACI7.7.1., See attached SK-1 & SK-2 for our comments. Please submit shop drawing for us to review. Printed on: 2111/2014 crane Page 1 of 1 -. . . • 0 SK-01 8" #4 TIES @4" O.C. Dowel from Slab typ. TIES PER DETAIL 13/15.SC=321 . . . "' 0 CL :s 1 0" WALL VERTS. WALL HORIZ. #4 TIES @4" O.C. .... .... SK-02 0 e 3/4" -~'-:---t-----r--:---~ __ .....--+- 3/4" ST NDARD HOOKS(TYP@I.F HORIZ) TIES PER DETAIL 13 I 15.SC=321 NOVA JrVlt.: ' Daily Report TIME Apr 23, 05:15PM RECORDED BY KEVIN TINSLEY Concrete placement completed llSyds placed without interruption. Placed directly from the chute and mechanically consolidated. Hanson mix #3033510 Photos: Powered By NoteVault Nova Services, Inc. I Ocean Street Condominiums 1 Friday, April 25th 2014 1 Page 8 of 10 Daily Report Tests Performed On-Site TIME Apr 23, 01:56PM RECORDED BY KEVIN TINSLEY Placement progressing uninterrupted. One set of five compressive strength samples taken from Elevator #4. Photos: Powered By NoteVault Nova Services, Inc. 1 Ocean Street Condominiums I Friday, April 25th 2014 I Page 9 of 10 Daily Report Date Wednesday April 23rd 2014 Time Arrival Project Ocean Street Condominiums 2303 Ocean Street Carlsbad,CA 1013077 Timezone: America/Los_Angeles TIME Apr 23, 09:06AM RECORDED BY KEVIN TINSLEY Weather TIME TEMP DETAILS 05:53AM * 54 F Humidity: 83, Wind: 3 mph Mostly Cloudy !0:51AM * 63 F Humidity: 60, Wind: 7 mph Fair 03:52PM * 66 F Humidity: 54, Wind: 6 mph Fair *Yahoo! Weather (http://weather.yahoo.com) Final periodic inspection of spread footings and continuous observation of concrete placement I compressive strength sampling. Referenced Document TIME Apr 23, !1:31AM RECORDED BY KEVIN TINSLEY PT·l,PT-7 Reinforcmg Steel TIME Apr :?~ !O:OOAM RECORDED BY KEVIN TINSLEY ~tors 3 & 4. Reinforcing steel placed in substantial conformance with approved drawings. Securely tied and supported above compacted earth. Areas are free of debri and dry. Photos: Powered By NoteVault Nova Services, Inc. I Ocean Street Condominiums 1 Friday, April 25th 2014 1 Page 1 of 10 Daily Report TIME Apr 23, 11:46AM RECORDED BY KEVIN TINSLEY Reinforcing steel at 1 line retaining wall placed in substantial conformance with approved drawings. Securely tied and supported with required clearances. Photos: Powered By NoteVault Nova Services, Inc. I Ocean Street Condominiums I Friday, April 25th 2014 I Page 2 of 10 Daily Report TIME Apr 23, 12:28PM RECORDED BY KEVIN TINSLEY Spread footings at 3, 4, & 5 btwn F & H. Reinforcing steel placed in substantial conformance with approved drawings (lnd is securely tied and supported above compacted earth with required 3" clearance from earthen Formwork. Photos: Powered By NoteVault Nova Services, Inc. 1 Ocean Street Condominiums 1 Friday, April 25th 2014 1 Page 3 of 10 ~a ' NOVA ('fVI C. Daily Report TIME Apr 23, 01:22PM RECORDED BY KEVIN TINSLEY Spread footings at 6,7,8,9&10 btwn H & N. Reinforcing steel placed in substantial conformance with approved drawings and is securely tied and supported above compacted earth forms. Required 3" clearance provided. Photos: Powered By NoteVault Nova Services, Inc. I Ocean Street Condominiums I Friday, April 25th 2014 I Page 4 of 10 NOVA ·rvi · · Daily Report Pre tressed Concrete TIME Apr 23, 11:37AM RECORDED BY KEVIN TINSLEY Periodic inspection of PT/reinforcing steel placement in BLDG. #13. Tendons in place per plan and are securely tied and supported. Reinforcing steel also in place in substantial conformance with approved drawings. Verified use of ASTM A615, 60 Grade bar. Photos: Powered By NoteVault Nova Services, Inc. I Ocean Street Condominiums I Friday, April 25th 2014 I Page 5 of 10 Daily Report Powered By NoteVault Nova Services, Inc. I Ocean Street Condominiums 1 Friday, April 25th 2014 I Page 6 of 10 Daily Report Concrete/Shotcrete TIME Apr 23, 12:59PM RECORDED BY KEVIN TINSLEY Concrete placement begun at elevator #3. Verified age slump and mix design upon delivery. Photos: TIME Apr 23, 02:41PM RECORDED BY KEVIN TINSLEY Placement progressing uninterrupted. Elevators completed. Began placing Spread footings. Photos: Powered By NoteVault Nova Services, Inc. I Ocean Street Condominiums I Friday, April 25th 2014 I Page 7 of 10 Daily Report Date Thursday April 24th 2014 Time Arrival Project Ocean Street Condominiums 2303 Ocean Street Carlsbad,CA 1013077 Timezone: America/Los_Angeles TIME Apr 24, 12:09PM RECORDED BY KEVIN TINSLEY Weather TIME TEMP 05:53AM * 56 F 10:51AM * 67 F 04:52PM * 66 F DETAILS Humidity: 75, Fair Humidity: 54, Wind: 10 mph Fair Humidity: 59, Wind: 10 mph Fair *Yahoo! Weather (http://weather.yahoo.com) Continuos observation/compressive strength of concrete placement at 1 line retaining wall. Con ret /Shotcrete TIME Apr 24, 12:43PM RECORDED BY KEVIN TINSLEY Concrete placement begun verified age slump and mix design upon delivery. Photos: TIME Apr 24, 02:31PM RECORDED BY KEVIN TINSLEY Concrete placement completed. 9yds Hanson mix #3033510 placed by bucket and mechanically consolidated. Photos: Powered By NoteVault Nova Services, Inc. 1 Ocean Street Condominiums I Friday, April 25th 2014 I Page 1 of 3 Daily Report Tests Performed On-Site TIME Apr 24, 01:17PM RECORDED BY KEVIN TINSLEY Concrete placement progressing uninterrupted. One set of five compressive strength samples taken. Photos: Powered By NoteVault Nova Services, Inc. I Ocean Street Condominiums I Friday, April 25th 2014 I Page 2 of 3 Daily Report Time Departed TIME Apr 24, 04:15PM RECORDED BY KEVIN TINSLEY Certification: ICC #8026522 Employee Signature: Powered By NoteVault Nova Services, Inc. I Ocean Street Condominiums I Friday, April 25th 2014 I Page 3 of 3 t& ' NOVA 'Wrvi • Daily Report Date Friday April 25th 2014 General Notes: Project Ocean Street Condominiums 2303 Ocean Street Carlsbad,CA 1013077 Timezone: America/los_Angeles TIME Apr 25, 12:30PM RECORDED BY KEVIN TINSLEY Periodic PT at bldg 12&11. TIME Apr 25, 02:12PM RECORDED BY KEVIN TINSLEY Weather TIME TEMP 06:52AM * 58 F 11:53AM * 65 F 04:52PM * 62 F DETAILS Humidity: 84, Wind: 3 mph Cloudy Humidity: 61, Wind: 13 mph Cloudy Humidity: 70, Wind: 12 mph Cloudy *Yahoo! Weather (http://weather.yahoo.com) Periodic inspection of Elevators 1&2. Slab reinforcing and grade beams placed in substantial conformance with approved drawings. Securely tied and supported above compacted earth. Vertical reinforcing shall be placed prior to concrete. Pits being covered to shield from tonight's expected rain. Photos: Powered By NoteVault Nova Services, Inc. I Ocean Street Condominiums I Tuesday, April 29th 2014 1 Page 1 of 3 ·.·~··· Daily Report TIME Apr 25, 02:25PM RECORDED BY KEVIN TINSLEY PT 1 Reinforcing steel at bldg. 12. Verified use of ASTM A615, 60 grade bar placed in substantial conformance with approved drawings an is securely tied and supported above compacted earth and waterproofing material. Photos: Powered By NoteVault Nova Services, Inc. I Ocean Street Condominiums I Tuesday, April 29th 2014 I Page 2 of 3 ~a ' OVA •nit:· Daily Report TIME Apr 25, 02:38PM RECORDED BY KEVIN TINSLEY Certification: ICC #8026522 Employee Signature:------------ Powered By NoteVault Nova Services, Inc. I Ocean Street Condominiums I Tuesday, April 29th 2014 I Page 3 of 3 I Daniel E Wyman -884636 Prestressed Concrete Special inspector-Exp. 08/19/2016 Stiucturi;ll Masonry.Speciallnspector-Exp. 08/19/2016 ,, ., Sfructural Steel and Bolting Special Inspector -Exp. 08/19/2016 Daniel E Wyman -884636 Reinforced Concrete Special Inspector-Exp. 08/19/2016 i Structural Steel & Welding Special Inspector-Exp. 08/19/2016 Structural Welding' Special inspector-Exp. 08/19/2016 0· • ' ' 8AGS DAILY RnD REPORT ADVANCED 6EOI'ECJINICAL 80I.IJ110N8, INC. P/W: t ~o.C: ... e>Cp DATE: ;1. -:,.,_ -\_~-"1":\.~-~ cuENT: Z6vl.tYR ~Tt-1.~--n s ~~_!NTS REPRESENTAnYE: t·tl K.t.: ----·----~-----·-··-··---.-. ------PROJE~NAM~:~~~ ~ REPORTNO. PROJECT LOCAnON~JE:b"17 TRACT NO. CONTRACTOR: lfot.vf,. WEATHER: ~--:"76> •· ---~ ---------------------------------------------------· ------ ------------------------------------ EARTHWORKEQUIPMENT:(D t·\\t--\l 6>CJ_,..\.)J>i062 v~(/J(~~ v..~t:.;.C(... t-<r.'o-~T'._, DESCRII'JlON C1F PIIOJ(a ACIMTIES;-0<4 0 cr (:t ,.;::, ~ '2:::'~ ,~-p _::;-Q_~,.&c!l€ ~ ~atl o~ -<~t~~7~~~-~~-7~~{::,---:_., ~c:;:D CA-l oo~: ~~-?>__._ _ _4>~-Q_~c;;i_c:lf?_.llt_...-.c'--e,~~__L1~--:.ttt~-~~>-?~x.~:.L"~'') --yo~c.HC::.~ (~ 'lu.~0 'ltA u-.1 L.An"S--u->l(K MOl':;( oN. ~ .. -~ __ w;e_;:.ld'\L ----~----~---~--------------------------------------------------- .U\\t.x t1o4ae=1\DtP ~~ '?'P-0\.ln / -~_.. p fl\t~l 6'><1:ft\li'.>1C;X)~ v~' Ti( 'l \ I \ ~e.? .... ~-~<-__ t}dJ[2 ~,yu-~-' C-! ~..::, II:.cc~·J c• .• ,... 1Lf"t ll c/:Jt/;;> (Oc;R£1:> 1}, H'f> f'c><.;,Si) I D (' c r ((71 _i. ~" L~C'~ \c.' --'~--------------------------~--------·-----------------------------r- --------·· ----,----- ----------------------~------------- -----··· ----·----· ·--·--------· -- ----.-----·--------~----~ -~· .. r----·--. --BILLED HOURS CI.IENn REPIESENTA1NE ' . I ; tECH : FIELD ~ 1RAV£L: . --•· SIGNED: _________ _ . I \? , 0 I PIUNTED: r ·t -----------mu: -------- - FIELD MEMO ADVANCED GEOTEOINICAL SOUITION8, INC. ~UENT: Z,~E,fJt/'(IL 7J'f!L~ S CUENTS REPRESENTATIVE: fOAJ --f / IV/JIC.C '-/VI.= -I :bs-tJ ~ .. -~ATE: .. 2'":"'./7-/~. ~~EcrNA!t4E:. c!JC641JS { _ __ . TRACI'NO.: --·----~------------·------------------ PROJECT LOCAnON: ~-S f!,~t:J WEATHER CONDmONS: S4-NN_Y Wl'fA. J1 II!i OF OBSERVADON; f2fiooting/Caisson Excavation (Indicate as-built and desl&n embedment depths, setback) 0 Retaining Wall (Indicate type of wall, If drains Installed per plan, llmltl of select badd'lll-lf observed) 0 Presaturation {Indicate depth of presaturatlon and moisture content) 0 Subgrade (Specify curb and sutter, flatwortc, or pavement) 0 Removal Bottom 0 Subdrain 0 Keyway Excavation 0 Reinforcing Steel 0 Special Inspection:----------0 Concrete Testing 0 Other: ____________ _ UMITS OF OBSERVAnON/ TESTING COVERED BY THIS Nona: ---··-·· -··-··;tt.• ---··-·· --·-·-·-----· --·------~-·--------·--··-·--··-------- 8«JG 8' M/o77AI[r-S. ··----_ .. _ __ _ ____ .. ______ _ --··----------------------------------. ·-- D~~~~NOFPROJECT_A~_IJ~I!~/_~~~~ ___ --·-·-··· ________ . __ .. _ CJ~Srn& ~0/'!--_ ~17;../'C---: OISS~/l..t!"t_f20~--~f:_d_U)(i-_ ?. EQa.?lAFG~ ·_E?_;tt;_4LC2~C2. !Q~lJti+7_.__ OOAJ~~-f.J.SE£? 0UtL/~££.,-.llJ ~K..44.'?i71.S .. tf111:! ~--~-_fie/( ~'-~I2~L ______ z,, .. _~ tA.J u~ ~_e_s __ § ~k~ ~-~~-~-~~ t=o_o__ZJ"'-C-S £K~_a_Ll!J_rt; ~~0 .. ~.~~~1/?_El_~-----_____ _ C/J~('J'V'K--fll~_._17.:>._CL-J£:.,/ffl) /~(.{;._ UJ()$€__SC!.t'-/b~~l2 .1.1. ... ~~~41 fo-o11dlr_5_/?tftp_/L __ zr;__f?p~!t__t--__W~CI:Jo.~-~()TZ~~,_----· _5~ ~RS/!1~! ______________ ... ------------. ----· _ .. ·--... ·-·· _____ ·-·-___ _ QJENTS REPRESENTATIVE SIGNED: _________ _ PRINTED: ________ _ Tm.E: ________ _ - --·o·.-_----__ ,_~ .. _ . . . :: ;.' -.,~ '. ··-'<:· FIELD MEMO ADVANCED GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC. AGS CLIENT: Z€"'t.?HYf2_ _ _¥~-:z,_::rt:'~'6 ____________ f!__/W:. 1'205 -:~12_____ __ _ CLIENT'S__!tEPRESENTAT~~~: l,..~y CJ,-~ DATE: \ , 2. 2.-14 W6it> PROJECT NAME:~ -t;-r. TRACT NO.: PROJECT LOCATION: Cf>i?..V;;;...'P$.12 TYP£ Of OBSERVATION; ---~~!HE!t_CONOITIONS: ~ 75 co ~Footing/caisson Excavation {Indicate as-built and design e"m~ment depths, setback) 0 Retaining Wall (Indicate type of wall, If drains Installed per pta't., limit's of select backfill-If observed) 0 Presaturation (Indicate depth of presaturation and moisture content) 0 Subgrade (Specify curb and gutter, flatwork, or pavement} D Removal Bottom 0 Subdrain D Keyway Excavation D Reinforcing Steel 0 Special Inspection:-------------0 Concrete Testing D Other:---------------- LIMITS OF OBSERVATION/ TESnNG COVERED BY THIS.NOncE: -~-z:-~rttJ e:. q..'6€QVA.u~--------------- ··---···---------·--·--------------·----------- DESCRIPTIONOFPROJECTACTMTES/TESTING: ~\\ ~u-k4 ~7\.o..,.\$ ~1'2.12 oP.,!S€..i?,Vii,.1;) ~ "1il~ (!I>¢V.,~-v, ~ ~ ~~ . -nt ~ ~lt-1~ "'f"'c07t t\6'1 6-xe,..c.V~\OH~ o'EGG.~\) .I.>'O....JG. ~~'-c..bS'l '~ F'Lbc...t:: \?o"t>t...»-'\ u}t.;~l t;..Wo-U:~ ~5i Pjt, ov: ~f'"'rt:. '1Ut.. Gxct:..vt>Tto\4'(:-e:x.f'c:Y~ rtt"2-H __ f'd.l Mt:erGfHI>\...o ~ ~~~.~~'1V -6c..>_n~,~ r=c.i<~ 41.~~ -::~FP~ or: '11-Hi:. t'Ct:?rl2VC·.:z ;:~-~c_.)!l.::-0. tlztOil·~ \(':? ""lU.£. 'Pv""'~~:.r-Yi o<l: ~EiF p.u... ~-C:> -c;;;<::n.f..... l>lo-\~~ t_"'b1:>f2.t·-c.. (.tkt::::rvU/ r ~;;.. ~~_;t:~:J .fc~_ 11i>& 6"a."~·~.,......,.. _____ _ __ _ -------·----------------- SITE VISITORS/FIRM: AGS TECHNICIAN BILLED HOURS CLIENT'S REPRESENTATIVE .,.....----., ~~~L FIELD OFFICE TRAVEL .· SIGNED: •' ,,/"'¥ £/;D SIGNED: -' .....--... ( J.O.t'\ C tAt>'::> PRINTED: PRINTED: l p< .. .'>l:': 'I ·- PAGE_.!,_ of__!_ TinE: ___________ _ fieldforms2010.xls/Memo RELDMEMO ADVANCED GEOTECHNICAL SOLUilONS, INC. AGS _f_LIENT: Zc&l?JlYf2. ?~t-t€£2. s ________________ __!_fW: t20S -0 (&> _C!1Et!T~REPR£!EN'!An~E~ __ _:r:~----~ATE: '2. .; _!2-\t.\ \tkw :&e-~ PROJECT NAME:~ ST. TRACT NO.: PROJECT LOc_AnON: CJ:>_:U_l.E-'---';:;;;;"'-----B¢.:12=---""'---------~---WEATHER CO~DinONS: Cl£A 1?. 7 5 ° . TYPE OF OBSERVAnON: ~Footing/caisson Excavation {Indicate as-built and design embedment depths, setback) 0 Retaining Wall (Indicate type of wall, if drains installed per plan, limitS of select backfill-if observed) 0 Presaturation (Indicate depth of presaturation and moisture content) 0 Subgrade (Specify curb and gutter, flatwork, or pavement) 0 Removal Bottom 0 Subdrain 0 Keyway Excavation 0 Reinforcing Steel 0 Special Inspection:------------0 Concrete Testing D Other:------------------ LIMITS OF OBSERVAnON/ TESTING COVERED BY THIS NOnCE: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ~DEsCRIPTIONOFPROJECTACTIVITES/~nNG: 00 -~t1~ "2eQt .>b.£'\ .c>-i Q...\~T ::ifL __ OPL«;;n\16. CC>HDrTH2t:·LQ~ e><.U>V..r>i6'D 12GTI'dcltclC~ Wt>l\ ra:>Tu..\6 UM;:ruo,...r 'f'vti/ .. 6.-lbH(~ ~.>TU Pit... of <OtT~~ AFlt:.fl • ~ I 12~M1T 'f?t.,t~, Cctl1l'-..t.XA~-~~t::'Q Oc.Yf H•dc:rz.. ,~.L=>n.iCcc.(:. HvV GX~.M..tc,. rtf?t1____F, ll :flJ.1.-T l "0 coo~.:.rne.J? G.J2 £,..( :::»TA£;l...G rot?--~..e.~ of Cr::>BCQrf;j{:;_:, • SITE VISITORS/FIRM: AGS TECHNICIAN BilLED HOURS CLIENTS REPR£SENTAnVE c---- SIGNED'~~ FIELD OFFICE TRAVEL SIGNED: 2,D PRINTEDC:::t =p=g PRINTED: '------- PAGE_L_of-1-TinE: ___________ _ tieldfo.rms2010.xls/Memo Request for Information 024 I Ocean Street R88idencee 2303 Ocean Street Carlsbad, CA Detailed, RFis Grouped by RFI Number Project tl 13-030 Tel: 858-549-3920 Fax: 858-549-3994 ......, • .._.,IIV'''"~;":"f'J:'~'to~'8~:::,1111f!ftil"tri~{";c,'"'"'::~·,, .... lllia··:WIIIit®W~;'".i•' .. ,, . DAHLIN GROUP, INC. Jonathan Shapero CRANE 539 S. Cedros Avenue 9605 Kearny Villa Rd .... :·· Holly Antillon Solana Beach, CA 92075 -'Sa:.::.c:..:.n_O_;.iego=::.;_,_C_A---'-92 ...... 1_26-'--------------- ~ MlltarMtllelk Andrew-Gouvis Eng. ........ . ........... . ·Qlf•IPII SC-200A & B. SC-313-Detail4 {HR RFI #8) Structural Drawing Disaepancies Cc: eo., .. , ••·ur;··· Cot*a ...... ADVANCED REINFORCING CO., Abel lnzunza 1 INC. CRANE Dewey Davis 1 ETIVISTA CONCRETE, INC. Enzo 1 ETIVISTA CONCRETE, INC. Frankie Negron 1 ETIVISTA CONCRETE, INC. Joe Oiaz 1 CRANE Larry Chase 1 ETIVISTA CONCRETE, INC. Mario DiCarlo 1 CRANE Philip Crane 1 ADVANCED REINFORCING CO., Saul Barrera 1 INC. ADVANCED REINFORCING CO., Tom Hofmann 1 INC. CRANE TonyRazo 1 QuJIIOJl • :t JlJI:LilJtll ,;.,.... Footing CW6.0 called out on sheets SG-200 A & B is not shown on the footing schedule detaii41SC-313. We have detailed 7 #61ong T & B #50 16" Transv. Please see attached SKS-1 and advise. ...... ...... ··••tt ......... ...,.. Please see attached updated footing schedule per detaii4/SC-313 which includes a SW 6.0 footing with 7#6 bars T&B and #15@16" Transverse Bars. Printed on: 2/18/2014 crane Page 1 ~~J'!elfel' f m m NrM"tt'tK Mfv?er -, -, ttre a -afeT' ·~ GOUVISengineering consulting group, inc. REVIEWED U REVISE AND RESUBMIT 0REJECTED 0FURNISH AS CORRECTED Corrections or comments made on the shop drawings during this review do not relieve the contractor from compliance with requirements of the drawings and specifications. This check Is only for review of general conformance with the Information given in the contract documents. The contractor is lUff responsible for: con: quantities and dime1 processes and tech coordinating his wo and performing his manner. The structu in this package Is th engineer who prepa Engineering Consu ISk tiq [(~ tor ral ~s re<J I~ GOUVIS ENGINEER NC: Date 2/13/201 ' '"'l:l .. ''w '":"''v"""':l:l u." n es of Construction;• ith that of all other trades; in a safe and satisfactory ~equacy of items specified le responsibility of the them, not Gouvis Group, Inc. .... .... By Andrew Asfour 'vVVO.U '"' a E HARRIS RFI #8 ·--.. -.- ~. .. . . u s'-o" ' '.) t: t\ : SKS=l 7#6 T&B. #5@ 1 6" T &B. I • ! I ;~rr~~~nlosntuJJJ:--:-: .J ~!N ONE TIE IN SLAB -· \ 7:J.W..PI::'-iEiAA:+O"iOF CO. \JM'I "'TO DROP CA» ---- -~vDRAJt SEEP~N ----R!'f!'.R TO COLUMN SCHED. ~G'oR REI"-f TYPICAL COLUMN SECTION 13SCJll ~~-NUMBER Cf-RAA.'i"C::O..<J~riS ~t..'· r./lJMf.!ER •)F !oTUOS<'RAil :)AL· OVEoRALL LENG-,_, OF RA~. OAC1-O.EPALL HfiGHT ()f ~AR. S ·STUD SPACING I ' I" -~--~j ~~~ lt:li>J_6L,LA TION_Q£':_$_B2$_'~1_111_E_I,J'_\.'_t~II::_Q_§~El STUDRAIL SCHEDULE (19 ------~-'> ~I -i ~~~ ~l· I, __]~ ·, ---..L. -4--1 ~g,';,~-~'"'""" ~ ~-. ~C"-C"'C"i I SEE~~" 1-o ;---! 7 i:"[i'i';'6'c~R co '-; 'YC "'"""'--aR 'I r ... } -~. 1sn: coLUtm. sc~;Eo I :~~~,~~ -. ' ' ;eue·>~~~'/ "" t:~ ·--M~_0N'-c1 . ;'i,·c''G / ' "A" U3i~~~ y_!_~_-.::.____,.-- ' --. . ,. . )•<: 1 ~~r.r~ . STD. HOC»( j ~'fd ~~r~ i ---"''-'-"""""-sc"!'o_,:: ~-_j ~~ 13 15 16 f'OOnNG DOWELS, VERT. &HORIZ.. ~EINF r t!Sx \?~@32"0C. S.O.G.DOWELS 81~~ ~~~~--1r] ·~ ~ ~z ; viF. -~ ~~~ ___ ,__ . ~~§ •I~ (1))0 ...,> ~f 1.1 t=· --' l-------' ~=?~~ l-J"CLR. TYP ADD. BARS Pi:R. PiAN ~ 1. FOR >OOTING R:EJNF •. stE SCHeDULE. 2. FOR SHEAR R9-fF, SEE WALL ELEVATION. INTERIOR CONC. WALL FOOTlli,P S1"".JORAILLNDS AT FACE OF I'' -I h:.::.l F--~r i §I -~ l,.,f--.-.-.-i~ T E"CIGE <:&' STUDRAILS ffiat'INLINE:'"''ITH STUDRAIL@ EXTERIOR AlFAC"EOF CO..IJUIN T¥P ~ELEF--~ • 81 ~ .·· ~? . : ~I ~. ~ F. if£ OF STUOO,o.Jl5 T08E ~lLI"IEV\IT>-1 CCX.VMN FACES ;_; IJ D Tl STUDRAIL@ INTERIOR DOWEL SEE WA;.l SCI"EOIJLE!!. '31SC.JI2 H.l"fHKCONC'ti'All.--~~ --WATE"l:PROOft»G II. OfWNAGE - -ot.JTS!tlE' ~ACE WAll R'EINr:'. SEE \'!'All SGI-IE"OUlE" Y'i"'LlRt-INF SEE WALL SCI-EDULE -t d"tl #4CONT ;.uj ~~I 8• _,::;;1 ~*I ~~~ ,.. _J ' EXTERIOR RESTRAINED CONCRETE RETAINING WALL 9 11 12 1 RE;NFORCED CONCRETE COLUMN SCHEDULt GOlWN Gl FlOOR c<va "' """""' ,----~ ~ ~ :I ! ~ k PARt(ING ~ L -·-·· :RETE COLUMN SCHEDULE 2SCJ13 /"'[ITJ ~< , @•oc ___ •:s I , '; 24' 1 ........ -# ""~~ £;? ::CTION s--o·w.x. t'4'MIN. \JE REINF TO SLAB A90VE TO WALL BELOW WfPROPER ' 'VALL PIER f::l_!__9 •7@8""0C VFA:1.E,F ';MOTE lj c' "' ,----I I 1/i • • ~I • ~ L. f-- & 7 8 -- - f------------- I --,~-~ fOO'IlNG SCH101A1 ~ill"---- 1-1-1 -__ lct<G I !HO&T Y4' ,_.. ,_.. ,_, ~ ... ~ ... ,_, ,_, ._,. . ... IV -<I" 10-0" lf'.o" 11'-4" 17-0" IT-O" ,_, N/' ~ ~ ~ ._, .... lr lr lr lr ,,. 20' 2r , .. ,. . , .. ,_.. .... ~ .. .. .... .... , ... .... .., 1 ... 7 12-atf Jl-N7 .... ~ .... 1---+---+---1---+--+----1 FOOTING SCHEDULE .... .... ,_.,. .... W7 -,..., ...... .... .... , ... , ... . ... 2 £1'\ 4 G GOUVIS ~.....-...,l'V¥'_ 1-100 r ..m\P~~> Drh(" "~""'l"'on~~h (.-\92oM ~"W)'l•rl &~~h trl 949.75::.1611 f.u'H9.75~.5~2l J'atm'ipf-in!P tdi&UH . .-..,..JQ e T!<I!.I!Ofg;;>t!OO.O"W~,u<O <---a~.--.•••~~!'"r~'-~"'" ~rrOf(;Oll<lll!l'•~ft_,,..,;; <;Ot«.H.TINC;C.i'Ov!'ANOAU.. ~.,._TIONit<O......,II COH~TIO.I.. TO.OU~nAtiONO-TOI'T>-18E OO.O.wtNG• CooN SECC>I'tEO. ~'--0 011 OB'N;IOVCiDHQ~CN<N<T ITI\UCT,_ II! tUil.T l'llOr-IT><EM WITHOVfWm-rtf<CQNI.(NTO!'CiO.NII MC;-~~1;110<.01' <~O£><"T<;Oll"~~ <."ouw;.no.;~;~;!IIOIIAUI'£><TI -·ro Pft.OIE\...,; Ocean Street Parking Structure D£VELOI'R ZEPHYR PARTNERS ARCHITECT: Dahlin Group Atchrtecture Planmng LOCATION: 2303 Ocean street Carlsbad, CA REVrstONS CONCRETE STRUCTURAL DETAILS PRPfEtT NUMBEit 62851 ~CINEER: GE DRAFTER: GE ISSUED DATE: PLOT DATE: ~01127/14~- ~ill_f:'IUMBER: SC-313 NOVA S rvi ' Daily Report TIME Feb 23, 11:32AM RECORDED BY KEVIN TINSLEY [Lat/Long: 33.135122,-117 .057608] PT placement nearing completion. Verified size, grade, profile and spacing of tendons. Anchorages securely attached to wood edge forms. Photos: TIME Feb 23, 02:28PM RECORDED BY KEVIN TINSLEY [Lat/Long: 32.802583,-117.236338] PT tendons placed in substantial conformance with approved drawings and are securely tied and supported mid slab. Photos: Powered By NoteVault Nova Services, Inc. 1 Ocean Street Condominiums 1 Tuesday, February 24th 2015 1 Page 2 of 3 Tl TIME Feb 23, 03:49PM RECORDED BY KEVIN TINSLEY [Lat/Long: 32.802583,-117.236392] Certification: ICC #8026522 Employee Signature: Powered By NoteVault Nova Services, Inc. I Ocean Street Condominiums I Tuesday, February 24th 2015 1 Page 3 of 3 NOVA rvi · Daily Report DATE Monday February 23rd 2015 Tl Rl A PROJECT Ocean Street Condominiums 2303 Ocean Street Carlsbad,CA 1013077 Timezone: America/Los_ Angeles TIME Feb 23, 10:33AM RECORDED BY KEVIN TINSLEY On site for final periodic inspection of building #8 PT slab on grade. ERS TIME Feb 23, 10:37AM RECORDED BY KEVIN TINSLEY Permit #CB131228 D CO CR E TIME Feb 23, 10:49AM RECORDED BY KEVIN TINSLEY WEATHER TIME 06:52AM * 11:53AM * 04:52PM * TEMP 54 F 62 F 62 F DETAILS Humidity: 83, Light Rain Humidity: 53, Wind: 7 mph Fair Humidity: 56, Wind: 8 mph Partly Cloudy *Yahoo! Weather (http://weather.yahoo.com) [Lat/Long: 33.164834,-117 .355976] [Lat/Long: 33.164697,-117.355994] [Lat/Long: 33.164428,-117.357016] Reinforcing steel placed in substantial conformance with approved drawings and is securely tied and supported above compacted earth and vapor barrier. Verified use of ASTM A615, 60 Grade bar. Photos: Powered By NoteVault Nova Services, Inc. I Ocean Street Condominiums I Tuesday, February 24th 2015 1 Page 1 of 3 NOON 11 .. I ~~~ «~~~-~ CITY OF CARLSBAD SPECIAL INSPECTION AGREEMENT B-45 Development Services ............. 1135flrldi¥AWIM JIO.G-17U www.Ciftlbldca.acw In ICCOI'd•nce willa Chllpllr 17 of the C .. fomlll Building Code the following rmat be com,..,. when work being ............... ~Wqulra tiPHIIII lnapectlon, .rructural obeeMIIIon IUid conalructlon rnatllrllll ... ling. Project/Permit: Ocean Street Project Address: 2303 Ocean St., Carlsbad, CA A. THIIIECTION ..eT IE COIIPL&TED BY TH1 PROPI!KTY OMIEIWAU'I'HORI AGINT ........ dledc If you.,. OWrw-Bulder o. (If you checked • owner-IJulldlr wou nut IIIIo OOIUf'l•• 8eciDn 8 of 1111 .........-.> Name: (Please print,,_) ___ 0-:K::-::-----------=-::-:-:-------=E~o.;::sa=:k:;.::U:.:.I ___ _ (fhll (M.L) CIMQ Mailing Address: __ 44Q9_P~ml_p~~Prive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 949-752-1612 Ematl· deosakul@gouvisgroup.com Phooe_· _____________ _ IMt: tJPruperty Owner OProperty 0Mw'1 Agent~ Aecord IJNchllect ~ R8COfd .Eftglneer of Record State of Callfomla Registration Number: S 5226 Expiration Date: 06/3012013 AO......-r: I. lhe uncfenllgned, dedlnt uncter pendy ~ I*Jwy under the IIMI of the S. of CIMJmla. htl._. ..-, Ul...,.._., .-.uAads:JIIRd PRJiftlll to 0DmP1Y wilt .. C1r C'JI CldlbM I'IQLIIr•**IDI' ...... lnapaaiDiW, ....... abMMitfone, CGriiiMIDn matullll tillinG n ohlll'llbrtciiDR clliM 1:1 • cornponMII, • pniiC:Itbed In the lllltMMnt Gf apeclllllnlpealoM -~on the..,..,_,._ 8nd, • ,...net by the c.-om. Bulllnl C... Signature~ _ ~--·-Date: 06/13/2013 B. CONTRAC10il'8 8TA'IUINT OF~ (07 CBC, Ch 17, Section 1708). Thla sec:lon must be completed by the COl Ill actor I bulder I OWIW-bulder. owner's &IMMMirle Company Name: Ocean Street 8 Qwner. LLC Name: (Pieaaeprtnt) Shawn M Monteith CFnll (M.L) (LMI) MallngAddraes: 11750 Sorrento Valley Rd. #130; San Diego. CA 92121 EmaiJ: ShawneZephyrPartners-re com ~· (858) 461-5126 hge1of1 Aev.OM1 ~~CITY OF CARLSBAD SPECIAL INSPECTION AGREEMENT B-45 Development Services ............... 1635 Flf'8day Avenue 760-602-2719 www.cartsbadca.p Ina•••..._ .... ;I r1711 .. C ..... Mdlnlc.dl .. ,.., .... .._. .... .., .... ,.._ ... ....., ........... ,.............., ........... ......, ..... ru .. •• ................ ,........._ Project/Pennn: Ocean Street Project Address· 2303 Ocean St., Carlsbad, CA A. TID I&CTIOIIIUIT. co.LI!TID IIY '*! ....,._rY CWJIII!RIAUTHORIDD AGmn. AI-. check I ,au .. OMw-8uldlr 0. (If you checked • owner-bulder you must alllo complete Section B of this agreement.) Name: (Pieaaeprtlfl Shawn M Monteith (FQI) (MJ.) (IJIII) MailngAddress: 11750 Sorrento Valley Rd. #130; San Diego. CA 92121 Email· Shawntzephyx:partners-re . com Phone· (858) 461-5126 I am: OProperty Owner ~~Property OWner's Agent of Record CArchltect of Record OEngineer of Record state of Calfomla Raglalrallon Number: __________ Expiration Date-· ------ AGREEMENT: I, the undersigned, daclant under penalty of perjury und« the laws of the State of California, that I have read, undersland, acknowledge n promlee ID comply with the City of Certabad ~ for special inapecllone, ltructural observations, COI'ttltn.ldlon materials tasting and off-lite fabrication of bulking components, as pi'HCI1bad in the statament C'l ........ ~ M;l;f*na and, .. ""'*"" by the~ Bulclng Code. Slgnatunl" · Date: b /11/Jl Contractor's Company Name . .._· ---------------Plellec:l-* I you nOwner-BuldllrD Name: (PieaRprlnt) _______________ __,... ______________ _ (fRt) (UJ.) (Lilt) Mailing Address:. ____________________________ _ Email: _______ .,--____________ Phone·_--------- ________ Expiration Date: _____ _ S~n~~·~·--------------------------------------Date: ________________ _ Plge1of1 ~.01111 EsGil Corporation In lPartnersliip witli qo'f.lernment for (]Jui{tfina Safety DATE: 8/27/13 D ~PLICANT ~URIS. JURISDICTION: Carlsbad D PLAN REVIEWER D FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: PC13-0030 PROJECT ADDRESS: 2303 Ocean St SET: IV PROJECT NAME: Multi Family Condominium Complex & Parking Garage D D D D D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Shawn Montieth, Zephyr Partners 11750 Sorrento Valley Rd., suite #130, San Diego, CA 92121 EsGil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. EsGil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Shawn Montieth Telephone#: (858) 461-5126 Date contacted: (by: ) Email: shawn@zephyrpartners-re.com Fax #: (858) 678-8655 ~~• / Mail Telephone Fax In Person / \y- REMARKS: Applicant to add "Purple Note" found on sheet E-1.2 to all remaining plan sets. By: Eric Jensen EsGil Corporation IZ! GA IZ! EJ 0 PC Enclosures: 08/21/2013 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858) 560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 EsGil Corporation In a?artnersliip witli (jo'flernment for (8uitifino Safety DATE: 8/2/13 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: PC13-0030 PROJECT ADDRESS: 2303 Ocean St SET: III Q"""'PPLICANT ,)i?I JURIS. Q PLAN REVIEWER Q FILE PROJECT NAME: Multi Family Condominium Complex & Parking Garage D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's codes. D The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. IZI The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. IZI The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Shawn Montieth, Zephyr Partners 11750 Sorrento Valley Rd., suite #130, San Diego, CA 92121 D EsGil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. IZI EsGil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Shawn Montieth Telephone#: (858) 461-5126 Date contacted: 8\Z-(by:~ Email: shawn@zephyrpartners-re.com ~ail Telephone Fax In Person D REMARKS: By: Chuck Mendenhall EsGil Corporation [8J GA [8J EJ 0 PC Fax #: (858) 678-8655 Enclosures: 7/25/13 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858) 560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad PC13-0030 8/2/13 NOTE: The items listed below are from the previous correction list These remaining items have not been adequately addressed. The numbers of the items are from the previous check list and may not necessarily be in sequence. The notes in bold font are current. • ARCHITECTURAL & STRUCTURAL All OK + JURISDICTION: Carlsbad + ELECTRICAL PLAN Recheck + 2008 NEC (201 0 CEC ) + PLAN REVIEW NUMBER: PC13-0030 + PLAN REVIEWER: Morteza Beheshti DATE: 8/02/03 NOTE: No responses were found in the re submittal package. Please provide a response letter in the next submittal to expedite plan review. The items listed below are from the previous correction list. These remaining items have not been adequately addressed. The numbers of the items are from the previous check list and may not necessarily be in sequence. The notes in bold font are current. 1. Please provide a completed set of electrical drawings for a completed review. The following comments are based on the submitted plans. Site electrical service(s), pool and spa plans, fitness and other misc. site and garage plans for instance are missing. Hence additional comments may follow. A) All equipment included on single line must be shown and identified on floor plans. I.e., services to match names. 8/02/13-The sewage pump area single line diagram onE- 1.2 (like a flow chart) now shows the transformer feeding the generator depicted by an arrow. The transformer and the generator should both be feeding the transfer switch (which is not shown at all) The Generator and transformer spec sheets are attached (usually supplemental info. Does not replace design) with equipment shown and some design. However, complete sewage pump area site plan are what is required for plan review and inspection. Should have been coordinated with RBF drawings. No ground electrode systems is designed. B) Please provide generator design and include plans for the sewage pump station. 8/02/13-Specify conduit and wire size(s) for the transformer input power. Ground electrode system for the generator not designed. Generator and transformer spec sheets have been attached with equipment shown and some design. Indicate power feed source as transformer for circuits 7 and 9 on the (HP8) schedule in lieu of pump 2. 2. Provide a completed single line diagram for the new service. Include the following information: • Once electrical building services are shown then, additional comments may follow. "HM" 1000 amp feeders and conduit not indicated. 4VVG1000 not described. 8/02/13-AII buildings must have their ground electrode system to include cold water pipe bond if '""~----------------- Carlsbad PC13-0030 8/2/13 there are separate cold water pipes to them. Show cold water bon for all separate water feeds to a unit. Please ensure this is shown on E-1.2 single line diagram. For instance main service is in a separate enclosure. Building hence, on single line ground electrode system should be included for MS-5 and MS-6 and MS-5 and 6 should be bonded since they are in the same building. The elevator motor disconnects are not shown i.e., on buildings 11 and 12 single line. • Correct number of system phases now depicted as a question (?) mark. Still that way on floor plans. • Size (amperes, phase, and voltage) of the subservice. I.e., unidentified 1000 ampere bus fed from a 1000 ampere service disconnect. The first three 400 A feeders out of MS-A are without neutral wire. Neutral wire is required for 120 volt outlets. • Grounding and bonding details. Each unit requires the cold water bonded and each building requires a separate ground electrode system and disconnecting means. • An intersystem grounding bus must be provided external of electrical enclosures at buildings with services provided by feeders for use of "electrical systems" (communications, cable, etc.). This bus must be accessible and may either be mounted to the electrical equipment or adjacent thereto or adjacent to the grounding electrode conductor (the bonding jumper to be minimum No. 6 and the bus to have a minimum of (3) usable terminals. NEC 250.94. • Elevator loads are not identified. Typical for all equipment associated with such as disconnects, wiring methods and short circuit current protection. • The Utility fault current available and the AIC rating for all service overcurrent devices. 3. Indoor gas fired split system CU unit has a maximum overcurrent protection device of 15A according to M-1.1. Please review panel schedule 20A overcurrent devices shown. Response not provided. 8/02/2013-E-2.1 building 4 CU units do not have the required receptacle outlets. Also, E-2.3 building 8 CU units. 4. A means shall be provided to disconnect the elevator power prior to the deployment of the automatic sprinklers. Please detail how this is accomplished. (Hoistways or machine rooms equipped with automatic sprinklers. IBC 3006.5 Response indicate shunt trip added. Not clear on single line. 8/02/13-The motor disconnects are not shown on single line either. 5. Please provide the minimum required receptacle outlets for the residential units. Some areas include kitchen island and counter outlets, wall outlets in living rooms exceed the maximum 6' to a receptacle outlet, in entry hallway areas of over 1 0' hallway. Complete review will be done after re submittal since there are too many areas that do not meet the code. CEC 210.52 Still not done. See E-2.3 living rooms for instance. 8/02/13-Unit panels may not be located in bathrooms. NEC 240.24(E) 6. Garage plans are incomplete. Completed review will be done when the plans are completed. Key plan on podium areas such as E3.0 is too small to read even on full size set. 8/02/13- Response indicates plans have been enlarged. See Electrical Key Plan on E3.0 and E-3.1 7. Fitness area plans are insomplete. Completed re'lie•.v 'Nill be done when the plans are sompleted. "' ___________ liiliiliiooi __________ ~ Carlsbad PC13-0030 8/2/13 8. Please provide a completed pool room and pool/spa design for a complete review. GFCI Protection is required for all pool pump motors supplied by 15 or 20 ampere 120 or 240 volt branch circuits. NEC 680. 22(8) Only lighting shown.8/02/13-Piease indicate on electrical plans pool is not part of this permit. Also, circuits feeding fountains must be GFI. 9. Include, on the plans the following specifications for electrical devices installed in dwellings: CEC Article 21 0 & 406 • Dryer seems to have been indicated as gas powered according to gas riser diagrams such as P a.o. Hence the 2 pole circuit shovm on unit panel schedules for dryer may not be used for the 'Nasher alone. Additionally, 20A circuit overcurrent device shown is inadequate if the units were electric. Please correct. Still 20A shown on floor plans 'Nith two circuits for a gas dryer. • Balconies, porches, etc. (accessible from the interior of the dwelling and o)Jer 20 square feet in area) require a con)Jenience receptacle outlet. NEG 210.52(E)3. Still not provided at all required balconies. • Provide lighting required at the exterior side of outdoor entrances or exits with grade level access. NEC 210.70(2) 8/02/13-Code required outlet is not shown at all entries. ENERGY (CALIFORNIA BUILDING ENERGY STANDARDS) 10. A complete energy plan check will be preformed when completed and/or corrected energy design has been provided. Lighting energy compliance forms have not been submitted for the common areas, fitness and the garage. 11. Include complete exterior site lighting calculations to show compliance )JJith the maximum illumination levels for genero! site ill~:~mination and for speoifio lightiRg applioation locations. (Lighting Forms OLTG) Garage number of lights do not match lights shown garage drawings. /\bout (65) 2'x4' on plans (55) indicated on energy forms. The 1'x4' are not correct either. 12. Show on the plans compliance with the residential energy lighting requirements (Mandatory requirement): • Outdoor lighting fixtures that are attached to a building are required to be high efficacy or controlled by a combination photo control/motion sensor. • fVfJte: Generolly a high e#ioaoy style of fixwre is fh:Joresoent, oomplete with e!eotronio ballasts. Reg~:~Jar inoandesoent, q~:~artz halogen and halogen MR !amps do not oomp!y. 1. Kitchen lighting wattage calculations such as on E-2.3 with zero watts shown for incandescent lights are incorrect. Luminaire schedule on the same sheet shows 150 w lamp for L T -4.1 which could be incandescent. Also, numerous light fixtures are incandescent. Note on the plans that copies of the following Title 24 energy forms will be available for Building Inspector use: CF-1 R, CF-4R, and CF-6R. 8/02/13-Still kitchen lighting does not meet energy standards as they do not have % of the wattage as energy efficient lamps. 2. The interior light fixtures that are provided in "other rooms" (not bathrooms, laundry rooms, or utility rooms) shall either be of the high efficacy type or controlled by a manual- on occupancy sensor or dimmer. Please detail. Carlsbad PC13-0030 8/2/13 o Forced main between SMH #2 and the lift station will require a cleanout. Please provide. o No private water supply civil plans provided. 8. Provide complete water line sizing calculations: Include the water pressure, pressure loss calculations, water demands, and the developed pipe lengths. UPC 610.0 or Appendix 'A'. (Everything looks okay at present; I just have to recheck after I get the site design). Site civil utility plans? See preceding comment. 8. If, due to excessive pressure, a water supply pressure regulator is installed then an expansion tank is required on the cold water side of the building water supply piping. Detail the size and location for the expansion tank on the floorplans. CPC 608.2 Site civil utility plans? See preceding comment. MECHANICAL (2010 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE) Not so sure I have the updated plans: Many items seem the same as originally designed. 16. How do the exhaust fan backdraft dampers allow the exhaust fans to operate where installed directly overhead of exterior AC condensers. Same comment. Look at sheet M2.0, Lower level 2.1 upper unit: The condenser with the fan directing air in an upward orientation is in conflict with the (3) exhaust fan duct terminations directly overhead. These exhaust fan terminations are installed with downward facing hoods and backdraft dampers. Upon operation of the condenser the fan air will be directed into the exhaust fan hoods thereby closing the backdraft damper and rendering the exhaust fans inoperable. Note: If you have any questions regarding this Plumbing and Mechanical plan review list please contact Eric Jensen at (858) 560-1468. To speed the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans. "''"·---------------- BUILDING PLAN CHECK RESPONSES JULY 24, 2013 EsGil Corporation In Partnership with Government for Building Safety RESPONSE DATE: 7/3/13 WRISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: PC13-0030 PROJECT ADDRESS: 2303 Ocean st SET: II 0 APPLICANT 0 Jl..RIS. 0 PLAN REVIEWER OFJIE PROJECT NAME: Multi Family Condominium Complex & Parking Garage D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially com ply with the jurisdiction's codes. D The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. ~ The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. ~ The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Shawn Montieth, Zephyr Partners ll750 Sorrento Valley Rd., suite #130, San Diego, CA 92121 D EsGil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. ~ EsGil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Shawn Montieth Telephone#: (858) 461-5126 Date contacted: Mail Telephone Fax D REMARKS: By: Chuck Mendenhall EsGil Corporation (by: ) Email: shawn@zephyrpartners-re.com Fax #: (858) 678-8655 In Person Enclosures: l8J GA l8J EJ 0 PC 6/25/13 9320 Chesapeake Drive, S.lite208 + San Diego, Califaria 92123 + (858) 560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad PC13-0030 7/3/13 NOTE: "The items listed belcm are from the previous correction list. 1hese remaining items have not been adequately addressed. "The nurrbers of the items are from the previous check list and rray not necessarily be in sequence. lbenotesjnbo!dfqJtarecyrrent. Please make all corrections, as requested in the correction list. Submit FOUR new complete sets of plans for commerciaVindustrial projects (THREE sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: L Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. ARCHITECTURAL RES!DENTIALREQUIREMENTS R20CCUPANCIES.Byi!djngs8thru 13. 36. The floor plan for Bldg #9 on sheet A3.9a seems to show the rear SW wall of the fitness center is located below grade. The floor plan keynotes on A3.9a lists the hatch shaded wall as "Masonry Veneer" but the wall looks like a masonry retaining wall. The structural foundation and framing plans on sheet S-3.1 shows this wall to be wood frame supported by slab on grade foundation. Clarify what is intended at this location. NOTE; Sheets CALI &CA1.2 show this wall to be I HR construction. See note5I on CALI &CA1.2. The response indicates that the fitness center is partially below grade and that the architectural and structural plans have been coordinated. The structural plan sheet S-3.1 references detaii1/PT1 at the fitness center wall. Detaii1/PT1 does not depict a retaining wall. ADDED ARCH DETAIL 23/AD.10. COORDINATED WITH STRUCTUAL (STRUCTURAL RESPONSE: PLEASE SEE REVISED SHEETS- 3.1 AND PT -1, A NEW DETAIL 26/PT -1 IS ADDED) 4L Reference on each of the floor plans, sheets A3.8a thru A3.12b, the construction details for the party wall between units. The party walls must be I HR construction, extend to the roof sheathing and tested with a min. sound rating STC=50. CBC 420.2 and 709.4. The 1 HR rated party wall between units must extend through the attic to the roof sheathing. CBC 709.4. The response refers me to detail 11/CA2.3 keyed at party wall locations Bldgs 8-12. the one hour party wall detaii11/CA2.3 does not show the wall extending into the attic area. The roof ceiling area is listed in keynote 617 on sheet A6.2 as " Non rated" roof/ceiling assembly. As per code section 709.4 draftstopping is required above and in line with the party wall. REVISED DETAIL TO SHOW WALL EXTENDING INTO ATTIC AREA. 42. Reference on the floor plans the construction detail for the elevator walls between the elevator shaft and the units. The wallmust meet the min sound rating STC=50. The response indicates that 3/CA2.2 is keyed to elevator wall locations on Bldgs 1-12 .. The wall between the public elevator and dwelling unit must be 1 HR and have an STC rating of 50. detail 3/CA2.2 is shown with an STC rating of 45-49. REVISED DETAIL TO SHOW AN STC RATING OF 57. Carlsbad PC13-0030 7/3/13 43. The floor plan of Unit #13 on sheet A3.13a seems to indicate that the entire South End ofthe lower unit and the stair well is below grade. The foundation plan on sheet S-13.1 does not the South wall of the lower unit below grade. Please clarify and coordinate with the strcutural plans. The response indicates" South End of of Stair well is below grade. See floor framing plan S-12.2 and details 24 & 25/PT1. retaining wall on civil plans" the framing plans for Bldg 13 is found on sheets S-13.2. the details 24 & 25/PT1 shows the retaining wall to be part of the bldg construction. Include as part of the structural plans design and construction details for the retaining walls. COORDINATED WITH STRUCTURAL. (STRUCTURAL RESPONSE: PLEASE SEE REVISED PT -1. NOTE 7 IN 24/PT -1 AND 25/PT -1 IS ADDED. ALSO PLEASE REFER TO NEW DETAIL 26/PT-1.) FOUNDATION 52. In Seismic Design Categories C, D, E or F, the soils investigation must address liquefaction, and, ifretaining walls are proposed, the soils investigation must address increased loading on the wallsdue toearthquakemotions. Section 1803.5.11. Thecurrent soil report provided by AGS dated 3/19/2013 indicates that liquefaction is possible for the Northern end of the property. This wall affect building 8-13. The soil report requires that the site under go in- situ construction of stone columns for the stabilization of the site. Submit design and construction details for the stone column site improvements. STONE COLUMN DESIGN AND DRAWINGS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED BY HAYWARD BAKER. 57. Where in the design calc's did you provide a design for the continuous perimeter wall footings for the garage. See sheets SC-200A & SC-200B listing the continuous footings. How did you arrive at the footing dimensions shown on the plans? The design summary for the garage walls has been provided in the supplement, attachment #3. The wall footing along grid line 16 between J-K must be 6ft wide. Plans list CW4.0. The footing along grid line 1 between E-F must be 6ft wide. The plan lists CW4.0. See sheets SC-200A & 200B PT-SLAB ON GRADE ( BLDGS 9 THRU 13) 60. Include as part of the PT design for each building the max concentrated load that the 5" PT slab can support and the max continuous load tha the 5" slab can support. The plans show both continuous bearing wall loads and concentrated post loads supported only on the 5"PT slab on grade. The response to this item from Gouvis Engr. Includes a design for concentrated loads on continuous footings and on the 5" slab. The design includes max two story concentrated load on the continuous footing that is 15" wide X18" deep. The PT plans show that all continuous perimeter footings are 12" wide. See detaii1/PT1. Is the 12" wide footing adequate to support the max expected 2 story concentrated loads? STRUCTURAL BUILDINGS 8-13 63. The foundation plans for Bldgs 9, 10, 11 & 12 all are shown with lower levels below grade but the foundation plans do not include retaining walls for the below grade locations and light wells. It appears from the architectural plans the rear elevation of these bldgs will have a !well to allow light and emergency escape for the lower floor units. Clarify on sheet S-3.1, S-3.1A, S-3.1B & S- 3 .1 C where these retaining walls occur and provide design and construction details on the plans. The response directs me to "see new plan" the foundation sheets do include a lightly shaded wall adjacent to the building but there is no construction details for retaining wall and the only foundation detail referenced is 1/PT1 & 15/PT1. Neither of these details shows a retaining wall condition. Carlsbad PC13-0030 7/3/13 END OF ARCHITECTURAL & SlRUCTURAL PLAN RECHECK To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. Ifyou have any questions regardingthese plan review items, please contact Chuck ~ndenhall at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. PLUMBING and MECHANICAL RECHECK COMMENTS PLAN REVIEWER: Eric Jensen ARCHITECTURAL PME ITEMS + Site Items such as: Pool equipment building, generator for lift station, firepit (pool area), fireplaces, and water features, water fountains are included on landscape and civil plans but not on the plumbing or mechanical sets. Please clarify the status of these items under ''Scope". PLUMBING (201 0 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE) 1. Provide the site plumbing plans showing the locations of the gas and water meters and the site gas and water supply piping. Plum bing plans reference Civil Plans however only the private sewer design is included with the Civils. Please complete the water and gas meter locations, regulator locations, and the piping from the meters to the buildings. I need the site civil utility drawings. 2. Clearly specify, on the plum bing plans, which City Department is responsible for the permitting, plan check, and inspections for the private utility systems: Sewer, water, lift station, and the storm drainage. Which department at the City is reviewing, permitting, and inspecting the site civil utility installations? 3. The building drain (3") is undersized for all units. (Mtximum 3 water closets/See CPC Table 7-5. Building drain sizing revised, this item remains as backwater valve check has not been performed (no civil site utility plans) which may substantially affect the waste pipe routing. 6. Include the design method of complying with CBC 713.4.1.2 for water supply piping plumbing penetrations of rated walls. Include a complete detail that summarizes the PEX to copper tubing connection, support, distances, etc. (Detail provided was for copper tubing.) 8. Provide complete water line sizing calculations: Include the water pressure, pressure loss calculations, water demands, and the developed pipe lengths. UPC 610.0 or Appendix 'A'. (Everything looks okay at present; I just have to recheck after I get the site design). Site civil utility plans? Carlsbad PC13-0030 7/3/13 8. If, due to excessive pressure, a water supply pressure regulator is installed then an expansion tank is required on the cold water side of the building water supply piping. Detail the size and location for the expansion tank on the floorplans. CPC 608.2 Site civil utility plans? MECHANICAL (2010 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE) Not so sure I have the updated plans: Many items seem the same as originally designed. 12. It appears that the mechanical systems are attempting (with limited success) to be installed in drop ceilings thereby not requiring dampers where a rated separation is required. Most ofthe submitted design complies however review the architectural reflective ceiling plans for areas that are not dropped with ductwork installed, ceiling registers in full height ceilings, and penetration of the floor ceiling by the supply air duct plenum. 13. Detail how the rated separation between the upper and lower units is maintained. Reflected ceiling plans don't work with duct routing, the registers in the living room and the HV AC supply au duct penetration. Detail how this design works, still looks the same to me? 15. Detail the combustion air for the furnace closets, all units. Odd response, some units have louvers above door, schedule describes sealed combustion chamber, standard 4" vent described, efficiency is standard (80%). None of it seems to be accurate to one another? 16. How do the exhaust fan backdraft dampers allow the exhaust fans to operate where installed directly overhead of exterior A C condensers. Same comment. 17. On sheet M-2.3, LL 8.1A, there's two little boxes between Notes 6 & 9 in the wall What are those? Same comment. 19. Check the Fitness Center for rated separation. I couldn't find the reflective ceiling design on the architectural. Found the reflective ceiling design but where's the opening protection? Note: Ifyou have any questions regarding this Plum bing and Mechanical plan review list please contact Eric Jensen at (858) 560-1468. To speed the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans. + JURISDICTION: Carlsbad + ELECTRICAL PLAN REcheck + 2008 NEC (201 0 CEC ) DATE:?/3/13 + PLAN REVIEW NUMBER: PC13-0030 + PLAN REVIEWER: Morteza Beheshti NOTE: No responses were found in the re submittal package. Please provide a response letter in the next submittal to expedite plan review. The items listed below are from the previous correction list. These remaining items have not been adequately addressed. The numbers of the items are from the previous check list and may not necessarily be in sequence. Thenotes jn boldfont arecurrent. ~------------------------------------------------~ Carlsbad PC13-0030 7/3/13 1. Please provide a completedset of electrical drawings for a completedreview. The following comments are based on the submitted plans. Site electrical service(s), pool and spa plans, fitness and other misc. site and garage plans for instance are missing. Hence additional comments may follow. A) All equipment included on single line must be shown andjdentjfjed on floor plans. I.e., services to match names. B) Please provide generator design and include plans for the sewage pump station. 2. Provide a completed single line diagram for the new service. Include the following information: • Once electrical building services are shown then, additional comments may follow. "HM'' 1000 amp feeders and conduit not indicated. 4WG1000 not described. • Correct number of system phases now depicted as a question(?) mark. Still that way on floor plans. • Size (amperes, phase, and voltage) of the subservice. I.e., unidentified 1000 ampere bus fed from a 1000 ampere service disconnect. The first three 400 A feeders out of MS-A are without neutral wire. Neutral wire is required for 120 volt outlets. • Grounding and bonding details. Each unit requires the cold water bonded and each building requires a separate ground electrode system and disconnecting means. • An intersystem grounding bus must be provided external of electrical enclosures at buildings with services provided by feeders for use of "electrical systems" (communications, cable, etc.). This bus must be accessible and may either be mounted to the electrical equipment or adjacent thereto or adjacent to the grounding electrode conductor (the bonding jumper to be minimum No. 6 and the bus to have a minimum of (3) usable terminals. NEC 250.94. • Elevator loads are not identified. Typical for all equipment associated with such as disconnects, wiring methods and short circuit current protection. • The Utility fault current available and the AIC rating for all service overcurrent devices. 3. Indoor gas fired split system CU unit has a maximum overcurrent protection device of 15A according to M-1.1. Please review panel schedule 20A overcurrent devices shown. Response not provided. 4. A means shall be provided to disconnect the elevator power prior to the deployment of the automatic sprinklers. Please detail how this is accomplished. (Hoistways or machine rooms equipped with automatic sprinklers. IBC 3006.5 Response indicate shunt trip added. Not clear on single line. 5. Please provide the minimum required receptacle outlets for the residential units. Some areas include kitchen island and counter outlets, wall outlets in living rooms exceed the maximum 6' to a receptacle outlet, in entry hallway areas of over 1 0' hallway. Complete review will be done after re submittal since there are too many areas that do not meet the code. CEC 210.52 Still not done. See E-2.3 living rooms for instance. 6. Garage plans are incomplete. Completed review \\ill be done when the plans are completed. Key plan on podium areas such as E3.0 is too small to read even on full size set. Carlsbad PC13-0030 7/3/13 7. Fitness area plans are incomplete. Completed review Wll be done when the plans are completed. 8. Please provide a completed pool room and pool/spa design for a completereview. GFCI Protection is required for all pool pump motors supplied by 15 or 20 ampere 120 or 240 volt branch circuits. NEC 680. 22(B) Only lighting shown. 9. Include, on the plans the following specifications for electrical devices installed in dwellings: CEC Article 210 &406 • Dryer seems to have been indicated as gas powered according to gas riser diagrams such as P-3.0. Hence the 2 pole circuit shown on unit panel schedules for dryer may not be used for the washer alone. Additionally, 20A circuit overcurrent device shown is inadequate if the units were electric. Please correct. Still 20A shown on floor plans with two circuits for a gas dryer. • Balconies, porches, etc. (accessible from the interior of the dwelling and over 20 square feet in area) require a convenience receptacle outlet. NEC 21 0.52(E)3. Still not provided at all required balconies. • Provide lighting required at the exterior side of outdoor entrances or exits with grade level access. NEC 210.70(2) Code required outlet is not shown at all entries. ENERGY (CALIFORNIA BUILDING ENERGY STANDARDS) 10. A complete energy plan check will be preformed when completed and/or corrected energy design has been provided. Lighting energy compliance forms have not been submitted for the common areas, fitness and the garage. 11. Include complete exterior site lighting calculations to show compliance with the maximum illumination levels for general site illumination and for specific lighting application locations. (Lighting Forms OLTG) Garage number of lights do not match lights shown garage drawings. About (65) 2'x4' on plans (55) indicated on energy forms. The 1'x4' are not correct either. 12. Show on the plans compliance with the residential energy lighting requirements (Mandatory requirement): • Oytdoor ljghtjnqfjxtyres that are attached to a building are required to be high efficacy or controlled by a combination photo-control/motion sensor. • Note: Generally a high efficacy style of :fixture is fluorescent, complete with electronic ballasts. Regular incandescent, quartz halogen and halogen MR lamps do not comply. 1. Kitchen lighting wattage calculations such as on E-2.3 with zero watts shown for incandescent lights are incorrect. Luminaire schedule on the same sheet shows 150 w lamp for L T -4.1 which could be incandescent. Also, numerous light fixtures are incandescent. Note on the plans that copies of the following Title 24 energy forms will be available for Building Inspector use: CF-1R, CF-4R, and CF-6R. "''""''~~ --------------------------------~ l Carlsbad PC13-0030 7/3/13 2. 1he interior light fixtures that are provided in "other rooms" (not bathrooms, laundry rooms, or utility rooms) shall either be of the high efficacy type or controlled by a manual- on occupancy sensor or dimmer. Please detail. 3. ShoN on the plans compliance with the residential energy lighting requirements (Mandatory requirement): a) In the kitchen at least one-half of the wattage rating of the fixtures must be high efficacy with non-high efficacy fixtures switched separately. Note: Approximately % of the fixtures will be required to be of the high efficacy variety. b) In bathrooms.garages.laundryroom s.and utilityrooms all fixtures must be high efficacy style or be controlled by a vacancy sensor. Vacancy sensors not shown. c) Allother rooms require any installed fixtures to be high efficacy or be controlled by a vacancysensor or dimmer. (Closets under 70 square feet are exempt). No response provided. 13. Common use areas in multifamily buildings require high efficacy fixture types or control shall be by occupancy sensors. No response provided. 14. Residentialventilationreguirem ents: No response provided. • Mechanicalwholehouseventilation must be provided. Include the following information: Fan sizing (CFM), ''Sone" specification, and the duct sizing and length. Note: The information must match or exceed the design found on CF-6R-MECH energy forms. • All fans installed to meet the preceding requirements must be specified at a noise rating of a maximum 1 ''Sone" (for the continuous use calculation) or 3 "Sone" (for the intermittent use calculation) 15. Duct sealing (Requiring certified HERS inspection) is required (Prescriptive Method) for all climate zones. (Specify on the plans the required inspection or what the approved alternate to the required inspection will be, if desired.). Note: Ifyou have any questions regarding this Electrical and Energy plan review list please contact Morteza Beheshti at (8 58) 56 0-14 6 8. To speed the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans. ooUVIsenuineerinu consulting group, inc. July IS, 2013 Re: Ocean Street GECG Job No.: 6285 I -707 Located in the City of Carlsbad Plan Check Correction Response -PC 13-0030 Plan Checker: Chuck Mendenhall STRUCTURAL The following items are in response to the Plan Check Corrections which have been incorporated into the construction documents. Item No. Sheet No. Responses to Comments Architectural Residential Requirements 36 S-3.1, PT-1 Please see revised Sheet S-3.1 and PT -I, a new detail 26/PT -I is added. 43 S-13.2, PT-1 Please see revised PT -I. Note 7 in 24/PT -I and 25/PT -I is added. Also please refer to new detail 26/PT -I. Foundation 57 l SC-200A, SC-l Refer to revised sheets SC-200A & SC-2008 for footing CW6.0 along grid 2008 line 16 between J-K and along grid line I between E-F. PT-Siab On Grade 60 Please see attached letter. The reply has been revised. Structural 63 S-3.1, PT-1 Please see revised Sheet S-3.1 and PT -I, a new detail 26/PT -I is added. 52 The stone columns and foundations are designed by others. If you should have any questions, please contact our office. Regards, GOUVIS ENGINEERING CONSULTING GROUP, INC. Ryan Zheng Project Manager 949.752.1612 4400 Campus Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 www.gouvisgroup.com Palm Springs, CA Pleasanton, CA Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam Comment 60 GOUVIsenuineerinu consulting group. inc. FOUNDATION ANALYSIS SHEET: JOB NO.: PLAN: DATE: CLIENT: (SB) SOIL BEARING = TO BE CONFIRMED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION CONFIRMED BY SOILS REPORT CONTINOUS FOOTING @ TYP LOADS TO FOOTING ROOF = 28 X 40 = WALL = 20 X 15 = FLOOR = 19 X 65 = CONCRETE SELF WEIGHT = 150x12x18/144 TOTAL = (W) WIDTH REQUIRED = 0,96 I = 11,52 II ALOWABLE POINT LOAD ON CONTINUOUS FOOTING P MAX = SB X S x W 144 PMAX = 10833 P ALLOWABLE = P MAX -TOTAL {S/12) PALLOWABLE = 7953 --1-r-- ~POST 1120 300 1235 225 2880 2500 PSF PLF /G] GOUVIS EGINEERING f.1::J CALIFORNIA SHEET: JOB NO.: PLAN: DATE: CLIENT: ALLOWABLE CONCENTRATED LOAD ON POST TENSION MAT SLAB Comment 60 + Concentrated Load at I Interior 1,.. I +Post 4x4 ,.. +Check two-way action (at d/2 from support force) Observed ACI318-08Section 11.11.2.1 -Point Load P = &K -Slab Thickness T = 5 inches -Specified compressive strength of concretEfc' -Strength reduction factor 4> -Ratio of long to short dimension 13 -Perimeter of critical section b0 a, d + For shear in slabs and footing v:conc = (2 + j>f.i:hod = V!,nc=4/ihod = f! •. c=<f +2>f.i~td = => Vnconc = ~max = t/JJ',conc = +Assume all Vu are from live loads (conservative) 1.6VLL = => VLL = P unfactor allow = 19718 # 13145 # 20266 # 13145 # 9859 # 9859 # 6162 # 8.162 K 131 ~===-.. ========~===t~ = = = = = = 3000 psi 0.75 1.0 24 inches 40 2.5 inches >= P => Satisfactory INTERIOR SLAB Page 1 GOUVIsenuineerinu consulting group, inc. July IS, 2013 Re: Ocean Street GECG Job No.: 628SI -707 Located in the City of Carlsbad Plan Check Correction Response -PC 13-0030 Plan Checker: Eric Jensen MECH&T24 The following items are in response to the Plan Check Corrections which have been incorporated into the construction documents. Item No. Sheet No. Responses to Comments 12 M-2.0-2.6 Please see the revised plans for new duct routing and drop ceilings on sheets M-2.0-2.6. 13 M-2.0-2.6 All the ducting work occurs in the drop ceiling maintaining the rated separations. Please see the revised ducting layout. IS M-1.1 All the furnaces are to be sealed combustion. Please see the revised schedule that shows efficiency standard of 92.1 %. 16 Exhaust fan back draft damper and the AC condenser do not seem to be related in this scenario. Please give us a call before issuing any plan check comment. 17 M-2.3 Please see the revised plans. Please give us a call before issuing any plan check comment. 19 M-2.4 Please see the revised plans for revised ducting work. ENERGY 10 T-24.1-24.1S Please see the Title 24 calculations on sheets T -24.1-24.1S 14 M-1.1 House house ventilation fan (continuous) is located in the laundry room. Please refer to the Fan Schedule on sheet M-1.1 for more information. IS T-24.1-24.1S We are using the performance method for energy calculation and no Hers testing is not required for this project. Please see the energy calculations on sheet T-24.1-24.1S If you should have any questions, please contact our office. Regards, GOUVIS ENGINEERING CONSULTING GROUP, INC. Dineth Ketagoda Project Manager 949.752.1612 4400 Campus Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 www.gouvisgroup.com Palm Springs, CA Pleasanton, CA Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam ,,..,, ------------------lllllllill-------..-------,--1-- GOUVIsenuineerinu consulting group, inc. July 17, 2013 Re: Ocean Street GECG Job No.: 6285 I Located in the City of Carlsbad Plan Check Correction Response -PC 13-0030 Plan Checker: Eric Jensen PLUMBING The following items are in response to the Plan Check Corrections which have been incorporated into the construction documents. Item No. Sheet No. Responses to Comments I P-1.5 thru P-1.8 Added water piping between meters (per Civil) and the building. 2 Civil Sheet I of 21 shows boxes for approvals by various departments. 3 Civil Civil plan PDFs have been emailed to kross@esgil.com for your reference. Sheets 5 and 6 show Finished Floor elevations, and sheet 13 shows Manhole Rim elevations. 6 P-1.2.1 Added PEX installation details. 8 P-1.5 thru P-1.8 Refer to site piping on plumbing and civil plans. 8 P-1.5 thru P-1.8 For expansion tank locations, refer to keynote 6 on P-1.5 and P-1.6, and keynote 8 on P-1.7 and P-1.8. If you should have any questions, please contact our office. Regards, GOUVIS ENGINEERING CONSULTING GROUP, INC. Adam Kral MEP Operations Manager 949.752.1612 4400 Campus Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 www.gouvisgroup.com Palm Springs, CA Pleasanton, CA Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam -----------------------------------------~--' GOUVIsenuineerinu consulting group, inc. july I 5, 20 13 Re: Ocean Street GECG job No.: 6285 I Located in the City of Carlsbad 2ND Plan Check Correction Response -PC 13-0030 Plan Checker: Morteza Beheshti ELECTRICAL Multi Family Condominium Complex & Parking Garage Item No. Sheet No. I 2 E-1.2 3 E-1.5 4 5 E-2.0-2.6 6 7 E-2.4 8 E-3.4 9 E-2.0-2.6 10 E-1.6 949.752.1612 4400 Campus Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 Responses to Comments A-Equipment names have been updated and placed. 8-Generator and pump station on site plan. See sheet E-3.4. Generator information on sheet E-1.6. -4WGIOOO replaced with (3) 3"C, 4#SOOMCM CU plus 1#3/0 CU GND. See sheet E-1.2 for update. -Font issues have been corrected. -Changed 3WG400 to 4WG400. See update on E-1.2 for change. -Where cold water bonded not applicable, I 0' rod or ufer grounding placed instead. See sheet E-1.2 for update. -Revisions have been made on single line. See sheet E-1.2. -Elevator information on single line and also throughout floor plans. See sheets E-2.3-2.6 & E-3.0-3.1 -AIC ratings have been placed on single line. See sheet E-1.2 for revisions. 20A overcurrent protection has been changed to I SA See sheet E-1.5 for changes on panel schedules. Shunt trip on elevator information will be on separate submittal. Floor plan layouts have been revised. See sheets E-2.0-2.6 for revisions of receptacles and lighting. Text has a been enlarged for better viewing. Fitness area plan completed. See sheet E-2.4 for complete plans. Pool room and pooVspa design will be part of another submittal. -Floor plans have been revised to reflect panel schedule. Dryer is gas and has I circuit #20. -Floor plans have been revised. Balconies/decks have receptacle outlets. -Floor plans have been revised. High efficacy exterior lighting have been added at entrances/exits. T24 for common areas, frt:ness and the garage have been completed and added to sheet E-1.6. VMW.gouvisgroup.com Palm Springs, CA Pleasanton, CA Ocean Street GECG Job No.: 6285 I Located in the City of Carlsbad Page2 July I 5, 20 13 2ND Plan Check Correction Response -PC 13-0030 Plan Checker: Morteza Beheshti ELECTRICAL II E-1.6 Lighting counts now match. There are (56) 2'x4' lights and (44) I 'x2' lights. 12 E-2.0-2.6 Floor plans have been revised. Photo-controlled high efficacy exterior lighting have added. See floor plans on sheet E-2.0-2.6 for revisions. I E-2.0-2.6 Kitchen calculations have been revised to reflect floor plans. See sheets E- 2.0-2.6. 2 E-2.0-2.6 Lighting in floor plans have been updated. Lighting is either high efficacy or controlled by a dimmer. See sheets E-2.0-2.6 for revisions. 3 E-2.0-2.6 -At least 3/4 of the lighting is now high efficacy. See sheets E-2.0-2.6 for revisions. -Vacancy sensors are used and shown in bathrooms, garages, laundry rooms, and utility rooms where lighting is not high efficacy. -Lighting in floor plans have been updated. Lighting is either high efficacy or controlled by a dimmer. See sheets E-2.0-2.6 for revisions. 13 E-2.0-2.6 and E-Common use areas are high efficacy and are photo-controlled. See sheets E- 4.0 2.0-2.6 and E-4.0. 14 M-1.1 House ventilation fan (continuous) is located in the laundry room. Please refer to the Fan Schedule on sheet M-1.1 for more information. IS T-24.1-24.15 We are using the performance method for energy calculation and no Hers testing is required for this project. Please see the energy calculations on sheet T-24.1-24.15. If you should have any questions, please contact our office. Regards, GOUVIS ENGINEERING CONSULTING GROUP, INC. Derek Wei Project Engineer Zephyr Partners 11750 Sorrento Valley Road, Suite 130 San Diego, CA 92121 Attention: Mr. Jim McMenamin ADVANCED GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC. 9707 Waples Street, Suite ISO San Diego, California 92121 Telephone: (619) 708-1649 Fax: (714) 409-3287 July 16, 2013 P/W 1205-06 Report 1205-06-B-8 Subject: Geotechnical Review of Proposed Ocean Street Residences Liquefaction Mitigation and Response to Esgil Review Comments (Carlsbad PC13-0030), City of Carlsbad, California Gentlemen: In accordance to your request Advanced Geotechnical Solutions, Inc. (AGS) has reviewed the proposed ground improvement design prepared by Hayward Baker Geotechnical Construction (2013) and prepared a response to Esgil Review comment (52) regarding design and construction procedures for liquefaction mitigation measures for the northern portion of the project. The following is AGS's response to the reviewer's comments: AGS has reviewed the referenced Stone Column Submittal at Ocean Street Residences (HB 2013). Based upon our review the proposed design and methodology is consistent with the current standard of care and generally meets the liquefaction mitigation recommended in our referenced reports. As is typical for these types of ground improvement mitigation measures the initial design methodology will be verified during the construction process by additional field testing (Cone Penetrometer Soundings (CPT)) and analysis of the data by both AGS and the General Contractors (HB) Licensed Geotechnical Engineer. Typically the procedure for approval will consist of the following: 1. Install initial series of production stone columns by the general Contractor. 2. Installation of the stone columns is performance based and can be modified during construction to meet the design criteria. For this project the performance criteria consists of: mitigation of surface manifestation (loss of bearing, sand boils, and ground cracking); and mitigation of dynamically induced settlement to I inch or less utilizing the design earthquake (M=6.9 with site acceleration of a=0.4g). Should testing (CPT) and liquefaction analysis indicate that these design measures are not being met then the depth, spacing, and or diameter of the stone columns will be modified to meet the design criteria. Subsequent CPT testing and analysis would then be conducted to verify that the modification of the stone columns (i.e. depth, spacing, and diameter) has been met. 3. A fmalletter report would be prepared by HB and reviewed by AGS that would summarize the actual construction (location, spacing, and diameter of the stone columns). As part of this final submittal a liquefaction and theoretical dynamic settlement analysis would be included. During construction it is the responsibility of the specialty contractor (HB) to insure that the installation of the stone columns is not adversely affecting adjacent properties and improvements. Accordingly, it is incumbent upon the contractor to develop a monitoring plan prior to construction. On similar projects ORANGE AND L.A. COUNTIES (714) 786-5661 INLAND EMPIRE (619) 708-1649 SAN DIEGO AND IMPERIAL COUNTIES (619) 850-3980 Page2 Report 1205-06-B-8 July 16,2013 P/W 1205-06 these monitoring plans consist of photographic records of the site before and after installation and vibration monitoring. The vibration monitoring methods should be determined by the specialty contractor (HB) prior to stone column installation and approved by the owner and the general contractor. In conclusion, it is AGS's opinion that the preliminary design proposed by Hayward Baker is typical of what we have seen on similar projects for the mitigation of adverse affects of liquefaction. Final design will be dependent upon actual soil conditions encountered during construction and could require modification of the current design. At the conclusion of the stone column installation AGS and Hayward Baker will provide final letters addressing the final design (number, depth, and location of the stone columns installed), liquefaction mitigation measures, and maximum theoretical settlement values. Advanced Geotechnical Solutions, Inc. appreciates the opportunity to provide you with geotechnical consulting services and professional opinions. If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned at (619) 708-1649. Respectfully Submitted, Advanced Geotechnical Solutio Distribution: ( 6) Addressee (I) Dahlin Group Attn.: Jonathan Shapero (email copy) ADVANCED GEOlECHNK'AL SOLUTIONS, INC. Page3 Report 1205-06-B-8 REFERENCES July 16, 2013 PfW 1205-06 Hayward Baker Geotechnical Construction, Inc. (HB 2013). Stone Column Construction Submittal Soil Improvement Ocean Street Residences (CD 12-09), City ofCarlsbad, California, July 15, 2013. Esgil Corporation, Plan Check Review Comments, Multi Family Condominium Complex and Parking Garage, 23030cean Street, Carlsbad California, dated July 3, 2013. Advanced Geotechnical Solutions, Inc. (20/ 3d). Geotechnical Review of Structural Plans Ocean Street Residences (CD 12-09), City ofCarlsbad, California, PIW 1205-06, Report PIW1205-06-B-7, June 19, 2013. Advanced Geotechnical Solutions, Inc. (2013c). Supplemental Geotechnical Recommendations Ocean Street Residences (CD 12-09), City of Carlsbad, California, PIW 1205-06, Report PIW1205-06-B-6, May 22, 20/3. Advanced Geotechnical Solutions, Inc. (2013b). Preliminary Geotechnical Recommendations for Permeable Pavers and "Grass Pave", Ocean Street Residences (CD 12-09), City of Carlsbad, California, PIW 1205-06, Report PIW1205-06-B-5, April12, 2013. Advanced Geotechnical Solutions, Inc. (201 3a). Grading Plan Review, Ocean Street Residences (CD 12- 09), City of Carlsbad, California (CD 12-09), City of Carlsbad, California, PIW 1205-06, Report P/W/205-06-B-3, March 19,2013. Advanced Geotechnical Solutions, Inc. (2012). Response to Cycle Review Comments Ocean Street Residences (CD /2-09), City of Carlsbad, California, PIW 1205-06, Report PIW1205-06-B-2, October 30,20/2. Geocon Inc., Geotechnical Investigation, Ocean Street Condominiums, Ocean Street and Mountain View Drive, Carlsbad, California, dated September 3, 2004 (project no. 07353-22-01). RBF Consulting, A Baker Company, Ocean Street Residences, Tentative Tract Map, dated October 8, 20/2, Sheets 1 through 8. City of Carlsbad, Memorandum CD12-09-0cean Street Residences r Review, dated October 25, 2012. ADVANCm GEOTECHNICAL SOLIJTIONS, INC. BUILDING PLAN CHECK RESPONSES JUNE 18, 2013 Plan Check #: PC13-0030 Project Name: Project Address: Ocean Street Residences -Multi Family Condominium Complex 2303 Ocean Street, Carlsbad EsGil Corporation DATE: 5/17/13 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: PC13-0030, PROJECT ADDRESS: 2303 Ocean St SET: I 0 APPLICANT 0 JURIS. 0 PLAN REVIEWER 0 FILE PROJECT NAME: Multi Family Condominium Complex & Parking Garage D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's codes. D The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. r8J The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. r8J The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Shawn Montieth, Zephyr Partners 11750 Sorrento Valley Rd., suite #130, San Diego, CA 92121 D EsGil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. r8J EsGil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Shawn Montieth Telephone#: (858) 461-5126 Date contacted: (by: ) Email: shawn@zephyrpartners-re.com Fax #: (858) 678-8655 Mail Telephone Fax In Person D REMARKS: By: Chuck Mendenhall EsGil Corporation ~GA ~EJ OPe Enclosures: 5/2/13 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858) 560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 ,' Carlsbad PC13-0030 5/17/13 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES PLAN CHECK NO.: PC13-0030 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 2303 Ocean St FLOOR AREA: Varies for each Bldg. See sheet T1.1 STORIES: 2 max per CBC REMARKS: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: DATE INITIAL f:>LAN REVIEW COMPLETED: 5/17/13 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): HEIGHT: Max per Bldg Code 39ft DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 5/2/13 PLAN REVIEWER: Chuck Mendenhall This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the California version of the International Residential Code, International Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Present California law mandates that construction comply with the 2010 edition of the California Code of Regulations (Title 24), which adopts the following model codes: 2009 IRC, 2009 IBC, 2009 UPC, 2009 UMC and 2008 NEC. The above regulations apply, regardless of the code editions adopted by ordinance. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 105.4 of the 2009 International Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process, please pote op thjs list Cor a cgpy) where each cgrrectjgp item bas beep addressed, j,e, plan sheet pumber, specjficatjgn sectjgp, etc. Be syre to epclgse the marked yp list whep ygy sybmjt the reyjsed plaps, ' I Carlsbad PC13-0030 5/17/13 Please make all corrections, as requested in the correction list. Submit FOUR new complete sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (THREE sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 1. Expand the applicable codes listed on sheet T1.1 to include the 2010 Calif Residential Code ( applies to all R3 occupancies ) DONE 2. All sheets of plans must be stamped and signed by the person responsible for their design & preparation. (California Business and Professions Code). DONE 3. The list of deferred submittals on sheet T1.1 does not include the pool and spa. Are these intended to be part of this plans review? There were no plans provided for these. Please clarify. POOL & SPA ADDED TO DEFERRED SUBMITTALS • GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS The California Building Standards Commission (BSC) has adopted the Green Building Standards Code which became effective January 1, 2011 and must be enforced by the local building official. The following mandatory requirements for residential construction must be included on your plans. The Green Building Standards apply only to newly constructed buildings throughout California. These standards do not apply to additions, remodels, repairs or tenant improvements unless the improvement is the first within a new building. CGC 101.3 proyjde a sheet of the plaps dedjcated to listipg the Green Buildjpg Code regyjremepts as listed below 4. Note on the site plan that the site shall be planned and developed to keep surface water away from buildings. Plans shall be provided and approved by the City Engineer that show site grading and provide for storm water retention and drainage during construction. BMP's that are currently enforced by the city engineer must be implemented prior to initial inspection by the building department. CGC 4.1 06.3. A 1.1. SITE NOTE #11. 5. Note on the plans that a minimum of 50% of construction waste is to be recycled. CGC 4.408.1. ADDED NOTE TO FLOOR PLAN NOTES. 6. Note on the plans that the builder is to provide an operation manual (containing information for maintaining appliances, etc.) for the owner at the time of final inspection. CGC 4.41 0.1. ADDED NOTE TO FLOOR PLAN NOTES. 7. Note on the plans that during construction, ends of duct openings are to be sealed, and mechanical equipment is to be covered. CGC 4.504.1. ADDED NOTE TO FLOOR PLAN NOTES. 8. Show on the plans that the gas fireplace(s) shall be direct vent. Woodstove or pellet stoves must be US EPA Phase II rated appliances. CGC 4.503.1.ADDED NOTE TO FLOOR PLAN NOTES. ~~'---------------.... ----------------~·---1------d----------- ,' Carlsbad PC13-0030 5/17/13 9. Note on the plans that VOC's must comply with the limitations listed in Section 4.504.3 and Tables 4.504.1, 4.504.2, 4.504.3 and 4.504.5 for: Adhesives, Paints and Coatings, Carpet and Composition Wood Products. CGC 4.504.2. ADDED NOTE TO FLOOR PLAN NOTES. 10. Note on the plans that interior moisture control at slab on grade floors shall be provided by the soil engineer responsible for the project soil report per CGC Section 5.505.2.1, item 3. If a soil engineer has not prepared a soil report for this project, the following is required: A 4" thick base of%" or larger clean aggregate shall be provided with a vapor barrier in direct contact with concrete, with a concrete mix design which will address bleeding, shrinkage and curling shall be used. ADDED NOTE TO FLOOR PLAN NOTES. 11. Note on the plans that the moisture content of wood shall not exceed 19% before it is enclosed in construction. The moisture content needs to be certified by one of 3 methods specified. Building materials with visible signs of water damage should not be used in construction. The moisture content must be determined by the contractor by one of the methods listed in CGC Section 4.505.3. ADDED NOTE TO FLOOR PLAN NOTES. 12. Note on the plans that bathroom fans shall be Energy Star rated, and vented directly to the outside. CGC 4.506.1. ADDED NOTE TO FLOOR PLAN NOTES. 13. Note on the plans that heating and AC shall be sized and selected by ACCA Manual J or ASHRAE handbook or equivalent. The duct sizing shall be sized in accordance with one of the ACCA methods listed in CGC Section 4.507.2. ADDED NOTE TO FLOOR PLAN NOTES. 14. Note on the plans that landscape Irrigation water use shall have weather based controllers. CGC 4.304.1. ADDED NOTE TO FLOOR PLAN NOTES. 15. Note on the plans that prior to final approval of the building the licensed contractor, architect or engineer in responsible charge of the overall construction must complete and sign the Green Building Standards Certification form and given to the building department official to be filed with the approved plans. ADDED NOTE TO FLOOR PLAN NOTES. ARCH!!EC!UftAL RESIQENTIAL REQUIREMENTS Ba.. OCCUpANCIES . Byi!dioga 1 thry 7. 16. Indicate on sheet A4.1 the number of the door listed on the door schedule between the garage and the residential stairs. Note 30E on sheet CA 1.2 indicates this door is to be a 3 HR rated, self closing door. This 3 HR rated door must be listed on the door schedule found on sheet A7.1. DOOR G102 KEYED ON A4.1. DOOR IS LISTED ON DOOR SCHEDULE ON A7.1. 17. The floor plan sheets A3.1 a thru A3. 7b show double walls at the stair and elevator enclosure walls reference on the plans the wall construction detail that applies to these walls as shown on sheets CA2.2 thru CA2.4. the walls between the public areas such as the elevator shaft and stair enclosure must be separated from the dwelling units with a sound walls that meets the STC rating of 50. 3/CA2.2 KEYED AT ELEV./STAIR LOCATIONS ON BLDG. PLANS 1-7. 18. The wall construction legend found on sheets A3.1 a thru A3. 7b show 1 HR and 2 Hr walls and indicate "See' What does this mean? The shaded walls shown on the floor plans are not listed in the wall legend. Please clarify. REVISED FLOOR PLAN LEGEND AND KEYED WALLS ACCORDINGLY. ~-------------......... ---------------~----------~-----........ •' Carlsbad PC13-0030 5/17/13 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. Sections A & B/ A6.2 are listed on sheet A6.2 as applying to Bldgs 1 & 3 "Typical Podium Unit". Wouldn't this also apply to all the other Bldgs on the Podium, Bldgs 2, 4, 5, 6 & 7? Please clarify. REVISED TITLE. The typical sections shown on sheet A6.2 lists keynote 604 at the floor ceiling assembly. Keynote 604 indicates that he floor assembly is 1 HR, See 6/CA2.2. detail 6 on sheet CA2.2 lists a 1 HR rated floor ceiling assembly but the sound rating STC=35 to 39 does not comply with the code. The code requires min STC, IIC rating of 50 between dwelling units. REVISED SECTION KEYNOTE #604 TO REFERENCE DETAIL 1/CA2.2. The 1 HR rated floor ceiling assembly between dwelling units must be supported by 1 HR rated walls. Clearly show on the floor plans where the rated wall sections occur on the 1 st floor that support the floor framing. See CRC R302.4. The wall legend on sheets A3.1 a thru A3. 7b include a 1 HR wall reference but it is not shown on the floor plans. DONE. SEE A3.1a-A3.7a The window notes found on sheet A7.2 indicate "see plans for Safety Glass Locations" & "See Plans for egress Window Locations" I do not find anything on the floor plans identifying the safety glazing or the emergency escape windows. Please clarify ALL EGRESS (EG) AND SAFTEY GLASS (TG) LOCATIONS ARE CALLED OUT ON BUILDING PLANS. SEE A3.1a-A3.13a The sheets A3.1 b, A3.2b, A3.3b, A3.4b, A3.5b, A3.6b & A3. 7C include a list of notes under the title "Reflected Ceiling Notes". Note 1 references detail 6/CA2.2 as the floor ceiling construction detail. This detail does not comply with we code. The STC/IIC rating of the floor ceiling system must be at least 50. Note 2 indicates that the 2n floor ceiling construction detail is 3/CA2.3. This detail depicts only the ceiling wall intersection but does not include the ceiling construction. COMBINED AND REVISED RCP NOTES. DETAIL CALLOUT 6/CA2.2 REVISED TO 1/CA2.2. Reference in the sections found on sheet A6.2 the ceiling construction at the roof. Which details shown on CA2.2 apply? SEE SECTION KEYNOTE #617. The reflected ceiling plans on sheets A3.1 B thru A3. 7C shows different ceiling heights. Clearly show the location of the furred ceiling to accommodate the HVAC ducts and reference on the ceiling plans the construction details for the furred ceilings. DONE. SEE REFLECTED CEILING NOTES 12 & 13. The reflected ceiling plans on sheets A3.1 b thru A3. 7C include in the legend on these sheets a 22"X30" 1 HR rated attic access scuttle. These are not shown on the ceiling plan. Why does the legend list the scuttle as 1 Hr fire rated? These are not fire rated buildings. REVISED LEGEND & KEYNOTES AND LOCATED ATTIC ACCESS SHUTTLE ON PLANS. Provide the ICC approval number for the "Napoleon" Linear Gas fireplace listed as Keynote #44 on each of the floor plans. Clearly show how this fireplace complies with the Green Building requirement that gas fireplaces are direct vent. CGC 4.503.1. REFER TO FLOOR PLAN KEYNOTE #44 & SEE ATTACHED MANUFACTURER LITERATURE. ARCHITECTURAL RESIQENTIAL REQUIREMENTS .B2., occupANCIES , Byildjpqs 8 thry 13, 28. The typical sections shown on sheet A6.3 lists keynote 604 at the floor ceiling assembly. Keynote 604 indicates that he floor assembly is 1 HR, See 6/CA2.2. detail 6 on sheet CA2.2 lists a 1 HR rated floor ceiling assembly but the sound rating STC=35 to 39 does not comply with the code. The code requires min STC, IIC rating of 50 between dwelling units. REVISED SECTION KEYNOTE #604 TO REFERENCE DETAIL 1/CA2.2. . ,' Carlsbad PC13-0030 5/17/13 29. The 1 HR rated floor ceiling assembly between dwelling units must be suppo~ed by 1 HR rated walls. Clearly show on the floor plans where the rated wall sections occur on the 1 s floor that support the floor framing. See CRC R302.4. The wall legend on sheets A3.8b thru A3.13a include a 1 HR wall reference but it is not shown on the floor plans. DONE. SEE A3.1 a -A3.13a 30. The window notes found on sheet A7.2 indicate "See plans for Safety Glass Locations" & "See Plans for egress Window Locations" I do not find anything on the floor plans identifying the safety glazing or the emergency escape windows. Please clarify ALL EGRESS (EG) AND SAFTEY GLASS (TG) LOCATIONS ARE CALLED OUT ON BUILDING PLANS. SEE A3.1a -A3.13a 31. The sheets A3.8C thru A3.13b include a list of notes under the title "Reflected Ceiling Notes". Note 1 references detail 6/CA2.2 as the floor ceiling construction detail. This detail does not comply with d the code. The STC/IIC rating of the floor ceiling system must be at least 50. Note 2 indicates that the 2n floor ceiling. COMBINED AND REVISED RCP NOTES. 6/CA2.2 REVISED TO 1/CA2.2. 32. Reference in the sections found on sheet A6.3 the ceiling construction at the roof. Which details shown on CA2.2 apply? SEE SECTION KEYNOTE #617. 33. The reflected ceiling plans on sheets A3.8C thru A3.13b shows different ceiling heights. Clearly show the location of the furred ceiling to accommodate the HVAC ducts and reference on the ceiling plans the construction details for the furred ceilings. DONE. SEE REFLECTED CEILING NOTES 12 & 13. 34. The reflected ceiling plans on sheets A3.8c thru A3.13b include in the legend on these sheets a 22"X30" 1 HR rated attic access scuttle. These are not shown on the ceiling plan. Why does the legend list the scuttle as 1 Hr fire rated? These are not fire rated buildings. REVISED LEGEND & KEYNOTES AND LOCATED ATTIC ACCESS SHUTTLE ON PLANS. 35. Provide the ICC approval number for the "Napoleon" Linear Gas fireplace listed as Keynote #44 on each of the floor plans. Clearly show how this fireplace complies with the Green Building requirement that gas fireplaces are direct vent. CGC Section 4.503.1. REFER TO FLOOR PLAN KEYNOTE #44 & SEE ATTACHED MANUFACTURER LITERATURE. 36. The floor plan for Bldg #9 on sheet A3.9a seems to show the rear SW wall of the fitness center is located below grade. YES. THIS WALL IS BELOW GRADE. The floor plan keynotes on A3.9a lists the hatch shaded wall as "Masonry Veneer" but the wall looks like a masonry retaining wall. LEGEND REVISED. DIAGANOL HATCH INDICATES MASONRY WALL. The structural foundation and framing plans on sheet S-3.1 shows this wall to be wood frame supported by slab on grade foundation. Clarify what is intended at this location. ARCHITECTURAL REVISED TO CONFORM WITH STRUCTURAL S-3.1. NOTE; Sheets CA 1.1 & CA 1.2 show this wall to be 1 HR construction. See note 51 on CA 1.1 & CA 1.2. PER NOTE #11 ON CA 1.1 & CA 1.2, THE SW WALL OF BUILDING 9 IS 1-HR RATED AS NOTED ON A3.9A & A3.9B. 37. The SW wall of Bath Room 2 shown on sheet A3.9a must also be 1 HR construction per CBC Table 602. The floor plan on sheet A3.9b does not show this wall to be 1 HR construction. SEE RESPONSE TO ITEM#36. 38. The eaves of Bldg 9 at bath 32 shown on sheet A3.9b and the roof plan on A3.9d must be 1 HR rated or fire retardanttreated wood. CBC 705.2.3. EAVE TO BE FIRE RETARDANT TREATED WOOD AS NOTED ON A3.9C & A3.9D. 41. Reference on each of the floor plans, sheets A3.8a thru A3.12b, the construction details for the party wall between units. The party walls must be 1 HR construction, extend to the roof sheathing and tested with a min. sound rating STC=50. CBC 420.2 and 709.4. The 1 HR rated party wall between units must extend through the attic to the roof sheathing. CBC 709.4. DETAIL 11/CA2.3 KEYED AT PARTY WALL LOCATIONS BUILDING 8-12. ,' Carlsbad PC13-0030 5/17/13 42. Reference on the floor plans the construction detail for the elevator walls between the elevator shaft and the units. The wall must meet the min sound rating STC=50. 3/CA2.2 KEYED AT ELEV./STAIR LOCATIONS ON BLDG. PLANS 1-12. 43. The floor plan of Unit #13 on sheet A3.13a seems to indicate that the entire South End of the lower unit and the stair well is below grade. The foundation plan on sheet S-13.1 does not the South wall of the lower unit below grade. Please clarify and coordinate with the strucutural plans. SOUTH END OF STAIR WELL IS BELOW GRADE. SEE FLOOR FRAMING PLAN S-12.2 & DETAILS 24&26/PT-1. RETAINING WALL DESIGN TO BE ON CIVIL PLANS. 44. The floor plans for the Fitness Center shown on sheet A3.9a is blank. ADDED FITNESS EQUIPMENT LAYOUT. There is no specific use listed. "'B' OCCUPPANCY" ADDED TO PLANS. I assume the occupant load at 1/15 for an undesignated use for gathering of people. The occupant load is 108 people. This requires 2 exits separated a distance of 1/3 the max diagonal dimension of the Fitness center. The plans show only one exit. ADDED SECOND EXIT DOOR 316A TO SHEET(S) 3.9A & 7.1. B OCCUPANCY (OCCUPANT LOAD OF 1/60), OCCUPANT LOAD IS 38-2 EXITS REQUIRED. 45. Exit doors from the fitness Room must be equipped with panic hardware. CBC Section 1008.1.10. ADDED PANIC HARDWARE AT BOTH FITNESS EXIT DOORS ON A7.1. 46. The size of the fitness center requires that both a men's and women's rest room shall be provided. CPC Section 412.3. DONE. SEE CA1.1, A 3.9a 47. The disabled accessible features in the common use Fitness center must comply with the nonresidential disabled access standards in CBC Chapt. 11 B. The rest room shown on sheet A3.9a does not comply. Door 319 may not swing into the clear space required in front of the lavatory, grab bars are required for the toilet, not just backing in the wall. RESTROOM(S) REVISED. SEE A3.9a The sink at the Alcove must comply with 11 B. DONE The following applies to the Fitness center. a. Note that the doorways leading to sanitary facilities shall be identified, per Section 1115B.6, as follows: a) An equilateral triangle X" thick with edges 12" long and a vortex pointing upward at men's rest rooms. b) A circle X" thick, 12" in diameter at women's rest rooms. c) A 12" diameter circle with a triangle superimposed on the circle and within the 12" diameter at unisex rest rooms. d) The required symbols shall be centered on the door at a height of 60". e) Braille signage shall also be located on the wall adjacent to the latch outside of the doorways leading to the sanitary facilities, per Section 1117B.5.1. REFER TO 6/CA3.3 FOR RESTROOM SIGNAGE DETAIL. RESTROOM PLANS REFERENCE CA3.3, SEE A3.9a b. Doors shall not swing into the clear floor space required for any fixture but may swing into that portion of the maneuvering space which does not overlap the required clear floor space. Maintain the required clearances at the lavatory/water closet without the entry door swinging into those areas. Section 1115B.3.2.2. DOOR SWING HAS BEEN REVISED c. Show, or note, on the plans that the accessible water closets meet the following requirements, per Section 1115B.4.1: a) The seat is to be ::::17" but S19" in height. b) The controls for flush valves shall be: •' Carlsbad PC13-0030 5/17/13 i) Mounted on the side of the toilet area. ii) Be S44" above the floor. REFER TO 4/CA3.3 FOR A DETAIL d. Show that grab bars comply with the following, per Section 1115B.4: a) Grab bars shall be located on each side or one side and the back of the water closet stall or compartment. b) They shall be securely attached 33" above the floor, and parallel. NOTE: Where a tank-type toilet is used which obstructs placement at 33", the grab bar may be installed as high as 36". c) Grab bars at the side shall be located: i) 15" to 16%" (±1") from the center line of the water closet stool. ii) Be ~42" long with the front end positioned 24" in front of the stool. iii) Total length of bars at the back shall be ~36". d) The diameter, or width, of the grab bar gripping surface is ~1 %"but S1 %", or the shape shall provide an equivalent gripping surface. e) If mounted adjacent to a wall, the space between the wall and the grab bar shall be 1%''. REFER TO 4,8,&10/CA3.3 48. The plans must show the location of the disabled accessible parking as follows: • The plans must indicate if the parking is "assigned" or "not assigned." Depending on the choice, the following items apply. ACCESSIBLE PARKING IS NOT ASSIGNED. RESIDENT PARKING IS ASSIGNED AND NUMBERED R1·R70. • If assigned parking is provided at privately funded multifamily building sites, accessible parking shall be provided for at least 2 % of the assigned parking spaces, but not less than one. At least one space of each type of parking facility shall be made accessible even if the total number exceeds 2 percent. Signage is not required for assigned parking. Section 1109A.4. 24'k OF 70 ASSIGNED SPACES= (1.4) 2 SPACES. 4 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES PROVIDED WITHIN PARKING GARAGE. • Each accessible space shall be 14 feet wide and outlined to provide a 9 foot parking area and a 5 foot loading and unloading area. Where a single disabled parking stall is provided, the loading and unloading area shall be located on the passenger side of the vehicle. Section 11 09A.8.5.1. ALL (4) ACCESSIBLE SPACES MEET THIS REQUIREMENT. SEE CA1.2 GARAGE FLOOR PLAN, REFER TO ACCESSIBLITY KEYNOTE #8 & #9. SEE A2.2 REFER TO GARAGE PLAN KEYNOTE#3. • Two adjacent accessible parking spaces may be provided with a 23 foot wide area lined to provide a 9 foot parking area on each side of a 5 foot loading and unloading area in the center. Section 11 09A.8.5.2. N/A • One in every eight accessible spaces, but not less than one, shall be served by an access aisle 8' wide minimum and shall be designated van accessible with a sign ''Van Accessible" mounted below the symbol of accessibility. Section 1109A.8.6. 8' WIDE AISLE PROVIDED AT ACCESSIBLE SPACE NEXT TO STAIR 6. SEE CA1.2 ACCESSIBLITY NOTE #9. SEE A2.2 GARAGE PLAN KEYNOTE #004. Carlsbad PC13-0030 5/17/13 • The words, "NO PARKING" shall be painted on the ground within each loading/unloading access aisle, located so that it is visible to traffic enforcement officials. Section 11 09A.8.5.4 GARAGE PLAN KEYNOTE #013 ADDED. SEE A2.6a, A2.6b, & SEE DETAILS 11&12/CA3.1 • The minimum length of each parking space shall be 18 feet. Section 1109A.8.5.3. NOTED ON PLANS, SEE CA1.2, AND REFER TO DETAILS 11&12/CA3.1 • An additional sign shall be posted in a conspicuous place at each entrance to off-street parking facilities or immediately adjacent to and visible from each stall or space. The sign shall not be less than 17 inches by 22 inches in size with lettering not less than 1 inch in height, which states the following: • "Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated handicapped spaces not • displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for physically disabled persons may be towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed at or by telephoning " Section 11 09A.8.8. DONE. SEE SHEET A1.1 SITE PLAN KEYNOTE #906 & SEE DETAIL 3/CA3.1 49. Expand the disabled access notes on each of the floor plans for Bldgs 8 through 12 to include the following DONE. NOTE ADDED TO BLDG 8-12 PLAN SHEETS. ADDED DETAIL 16/CA3.3 • Base cabinets directly under the kitchen sink counter area, including toe board and shelving shall be removable without special knowledge or tools. Finish flooring shall be provided <;>n the floor beneath the counter top. There is no exception to this requirement. Section 1133A.3. • Where both a tub and shower are provided in the bathroom, at least one shall be made accessible. See Section 1134A.5 for bathtubs, or Section 1134A.6 for showers. • FOUNDATION 50. A foundation/soils investigation is required for all projects in Seismic Design Categories C, D, E or F. Section 1803.5.11. SOILS REPORT ATTACHED 51. Provide a copy of the project soil report prepared by a licensed civil engineer. The report shall include foundation design recommendations based on the engineer's findings. SOILS REPORT ATTACHED 52. In Seismic Design Categories C, D, E or F, the soils investigation must address liquefaction, and, if retaining walls are proposed, the soils investigation must address increased loading on the walls due to earthquake motions. Section 1803.5.11. SOILS REPORT ATTACHED 53. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soil report are properly incorporated into the plans (when required by the soil report). LETTER ATTACHED 54. The design of the spread footings within the parking garage using ENERCALC computer design references the footings by F12-307, F11-265, F10-216 etc. How do these numbers relate to the spread footings shown on the foundation plan on sheets SC-200A & SC-2008. How do the footing design reference numbers relate to the DL and the LL reactions listed at the beginning of the ENERCALC spread footing design? 55. Where in the RAM design do I find the reactions used in the ENERCALC design of the spread footings. For instance footing listed in ENERCALC as F12-307 lists the column DL = 307K and LL=66K. Where are these found in RAM? Carlsbad PC13-0030 5/17/13 56. The retaining wall design included in the calc's do not include the cantilevered wall condition as shown in 16/SC-312. provide design for the cantilevered condition shown in 16/SC-312. 57. Where in the design calc's did you provide a design for the continuous perimeter wall footings for the garage. See sheets SC-200A & SC-2008 listing the continuous footings. How did you arrive at the footing dimensions shown on the plans? PT-SLAB ON GRADE ( BLDGS 9 THRU 13 ) 58. Include in the soil report the soil properties used for the design of the PT slabs on grade using the PTI design method. 59. Complete the information in detaii1/PT-1 for Slab thickness, Ym & Em, p (ext footing depth), q ( int footing depth) & r ( reinf cable ). Without this information I can not verify compliance with the design requirements. 60. Include as part of the PT design for each building the max concentrated load that the 5" PT slab can support and the max continuous load tha the 5" slab can support. The plans show both continuous bearing wall loads and concentrated post loads supported only on the 5" PT slab on grade. • STRUCTURAL 61. Special inspection is required, as listed on sheet SN-18, the designer shall complete the City of Carlsbad "Special Inspection Agreement. BUILDINGS 1-7 62. 81dt #7 upper level shear wall @ Master Bed Rm is not listed on sheet S-1.8. All other wood frame structural appears to comply with the design and shown on the plans BUILDINGS 8-13 63. The foundation plans for Bldgs 9, 10, 11 & 12 all are shown with lower levels below grade but the foundation plans do not include retaining walls for the below grade locations and light wells. It appears from the architectural plans the rear elevation of these bldgs will have a lwell to allow light and emergency escape for the lower floor units. Clarify on sheet S-3.1, S-3.1A, S-3.1 B & S- 3.1 C where these retaining walls occur and provide design and construction details on the plans. 64. Detail on the plans the connection of the entry deck joists to the light well retaining wall shown on sheet S- 3.2 of the plans. PODIUM TWO WAY SLAB 65. The podium shear walls are designed as "special concrete shear walls" per ASCE 7-05 Table 12.2-1 the R=5. See page 303 of 465 of the design calc's. R=5. The special concrete shear walls must comply with ASCE 7-04 14.2.2.9 which has added section 21.7.10.2 to ACI 318. this code section requires transverse reinforcing to not exceed 6" OC. The concrete shear wall schedule on sheet SC-321 lists the horiz reinforcing ( transverse ) at 16" OC or 12" OC. 66. The design of the podium concrete shear walls on pages 303 thru 306 of the design calc's uses a weight ( Mass) W=10325K. Where in the design calc's do I find that this weight includes the weight of the 2 story buildings supported on top of the podium deck as well as the podium deck weight? Carlsbad PC13-0030 5/17/13 67. Clarify in the design calc's for the footings on pages 424 & 425 tha the reactions listed as DL and LL also include the DL & LL of the buildings supported on top of the podium. 68. Pages 27 thru 29 list the superimposed DL at Fz=280 at a variety of bearing points and the LL as Fz=O at the same points on the slab. I suppose this represents the bearing loads from the two story building supported on the Podium. What do these Fz numbers represent and how did you determine the point load location modeled in the design? 69. Specify in detaii7/SC-313 the dimensions of column C2. The design calc's require this column to be min. 14" X 14". END OF ARCHITECTURAL & STRUCTURAL PLAN REVIEW To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Chuck Mendenhall at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. PLUMBING and MECHANICAL COMMENTS PLAN REVIEWER: Eric Jensen ARCHITECTURAL PME ITEMS + Site Items such as: Pool equipment building, generator for lift station, firepit (pool area), fireplaces, and water features, water fountains are included on landscape and civil plans but not on the plumbing or mechanical sets. Please clarify the status of these items under "Scope". PLUMBING (201 0 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE) 1. Provide the site plumbing plans showing the locations of the gas and water meters and the site gas and water supply piping. Plumbing plans reference Civil Plans however only the private sewer design is included with the Civils. Please complete the water and gas meter locations, regulator locations, and the piping from the meters to the buildings. 2. Clearly specify, on the plumbing plans, which City Department is responsible for the permitting, plan check, and inspections for the private utility systems: Sewer, water, lift station, and the storm drainage. 3. The building drain (3") is undersized for all units. (Maximum 3 water closets/See CPC Table 7-5. 4. Lots of references to a kitchen island waste sink detail, no detail to be found though. 5. Are there one or two dishwashers per unit? Be sure to include with the plumbing design. 6. Include the design method of complying with CBC 713.4.1.2 for water supply piping plumbing penetrations of rated walls. '"'''""---------------------------------+..-- •' Carlsbad PC13-0030 5/17/13 7. Provide complete water line sizing calculations: Include the water pressure, pressure loss calculations, water demands, and the developed pipe lengths. UPC 610.0 or Appendix 'A'. (Everything looks okay at present; I just have to recheck after I get the site design). 8. If, due to excessive pressure, a water supply pressure regulator is installed then an expansion tank is required on the cold water side of the building water supply piping. Detail the size and location for the expansion tank on the floorplans. CPC 608.2 9. Describe the method of compliance for temperature limitations for the following fixture types: public use lavatories (limited to 110 degrees). Only one, in the Fitness Room. Note: The water heater thermostat may not be used for compliance with this Code section. CPC 413-418. Energy Standards 113(C) 3. 10. Provide gas line plans and calculations showing gas demands, pipe lengths, and pipe sizing. CPC 1217.0 The 1" is undersized, at 150', for the water heater. Impossible to check without the pipe lengths/layouts. 11. Include the manufacturer's installation instructions for the direct vent style of appliance: Include (for combustion air and vent design): Pipe material, size, lengths, orientation, and number of permitted bends. CPC 507.1.2. Water heater). MECHANICAL (2010 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE) • It appears that the mechanical systems are attempting (with limited success) to be installed in drop ceilings thereby not requiring dampers where a rated separation is required. Most of the submitted design complies however review the architectural reflective ceiling plans for areas that are not dropped with ductwork installed, ceiling registers in full height ceilings, and penetration of the floor ceiling by the supply air duct plenum. 12. Detail how the rated separation between the upper and lower units is maintained. Reflected ceiling plans don't work with duct routing, the registers in the living room, and the HVAC supply air duct penetration. 13. I see Note 6 about the 3' from openings back into the building but the fan terminates directly above a window? Look at sheet M-2.4 LL -1 0.2A-both range duct exhaust terminations are right over the door? Check all units. 14. Building 13.1, dryer duct is way overlength. 15. Detail the combustion air for the furnace closets, all units. 16. How do the exhaust fan backdraft dampers allow the exhaust fans to operate where installed directly overhead of exterior AC condensers. 17. On sheet M-2.3, LL 8.1A, there's two little boxes between Notes 6 & 9 in the wall. What are those? 18. Detail compliance with CBC 713.4.1.2 for the mechanical details on sheet MD-1, dryer and bathroom exhaust. (Duct penetrations@ horizontal rated membrane). 19. Check the Fitness Center for rated separation. I couldn't find the reflective ceiling design on the architectural. Carlsbad PC13-0030 5/17/13 20. Residential bathroom exhaust fans shall be energy star rated and shall be control by a humidistat capable of an adjustment between 50 and 80% humidity. CGreenC 4.506.1 • Exception: Control by a humidistat is not required if the bathroom exhaust fan is also the dwelling whole house ventilation. 21. Detail the primary and secondary mechanical condensate waste design: Pipe sizing, routing, and termination areas. CMC 309.0 & CPC 807.0 22. For the Type 1 (residential) clothes dryers, provide the necessary make-up air source. Include the manufacturer's installation instructions and/or provide a minimum of 100 square inches of opening. CMC 504.3.2 & 905.3. Note: If you have any questions regarding this Plumbing and Mechanical plan review list please contact Eric Jensen at (858) 560-1468. To speed the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans. + ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW + 2008 NEC (201 0 CEC ) + JURISDICTION: Carlsbad DATE:S/17/13 + PLAN REVIEW NUMBER: PC13-0030 + PLAN REVIEWER: Chuck Mendenhall 1. Please provide a completed set of electrical drawings for a completed review. The following comments are based on the submitted plans. Site electrical service(s), pool and spa plans, fitness and other misc. site and garage plans for instance are missing. Hence additional comments may follow. 2. Please update sheet E-1.0 notes and references to the NEC code. I.e., note 25 article 370-6 referenced for junction box sizes is used for cablebus. 3. Provide a completed single line diagram for the new service. Include the following information: • Subservice voltage system and service voltage ratings shown do not match. • Once electrical building services are shown then, additional comments may follow. • Correct number of system phases now depicted as a question (?) mark. • Size (amperes, phase, and voltage) of the subservice. I.e., unidentified 1000 ampere bus fed from a 1 000 ampere service disconnect. • 800 ampere service disconnect feeds a 2000 ampere multi meter section? Carlsbad PC13-0030 5/17/13 • Grounding and bonding details. Each unit requires the cold water bonded and each building requires a separate ground electrode system and disconnecting means. • An intersystem grounding bus must be provided external of electrical enclosures at buildings with services provided by feeders for use of "electrical systems" (communications, cable, etc.). This bus must be accessible and may either be mounted to the electrical equipment or adjacent thereto or adjacent to the grounding electrode conductor (the bonding jumper to be minimum No. 6 and the bus to have a minimum of (3) usable terminals. NEC 250.94. • Quantity for the 3/0 ground electrode conductor for the 400 ampere UFER electrode is shown as a question mark. Please correct. Typical. • Elevator loads are not identified. Typical for all equipment associated with such as disconnects, wiring methods and short circuit current protection. • The Utility fault current available and the AIC rating for all service overcurrent devices. • Two different single lines provided for buildings 6 and 7. Remove one or correct sheet titles. • Provided unit feeder overcurrent device(s) are inadequate according to calculations on the next sheet of the set. Please correct. • The enclosure type: Indoor (NEMA 1) or exterior (NEMA 3). 4. Indoor gas fired split system CU unit has a maximum overcurrent protection device of 15A according to M-1.1. Please review panel schedule 20A overcurrent devices shown. 5. A means shall be provided to disconnect the elevator power prior to the deployment of the automatic sprinklers. Please detail how this is accomplished. (Hoistways or machine rooms equipped with automatic sprinklers. 18C 3006.5 6. Multiwire branch circuits now require a multipole circuit breaker. Please specify on plans. NEC 11 0.26.4(8). 7. Please provide the minimum required receptacle outlets for the residential units. Some areas include kitchen island and counter outlets, wall outlets in living rooms exceed the maximum 6' to a receptacle outlet, in entry hallway areas of over 1 0' hallway. Complete review will be done after re submittal since there are too many areas that do not meet the code. CEC 210.52 8. Garage plans are incomplete. Completed review will be done when the plans are completed. 9. Fitness area plans are incomplete. Completed review will be done when the plans are completed. 10. Please provide a completed pool room and pool/spa design for a complete review. GFCI Protection is required for all pool pump motors supplied by 15 or 20 ampere 120 or 240 volt branch circuits. NEC 680. 22(8) 11. Include, on the plans the following specifications for electrical devices installed in dwellings: CEC Article 210 & 406 • Dryer seems to have been indicated as gas powered according to gas riser diagrams such as P-3.0. Hence the 2 pole circuit shown on unit panel schedules for dryer may not be used for ·' Carlsbad PC13-0030 5/17/13 the washer alone. Additionally, 20A circuit overcurrent device shown is inadequate if the units were electric. Please correct. • Correct typo in bold lettering on E-2.3 upper level building 8. • Balconies, porches, etc. (accessible from the interior of the dwelling and over 20 square feet in area) require a convenience receptacle outlet. NEC 210.52(E)3. • Provide lighting required at the exterior side of outdoor entrances or exits with grade level access. NEC 210.70(2) ENERGY (CALIFORNIA BUILDING ENERGY STANDARDS) 12. A complete energy plan check will be preformed when completed and/or corrected energy design has been provided. Lighting energy compliance forms have not been submitted for the common areas, fitness and the garage. 13. On the plans clearly show the wall and roof insulation locations, thickness, and R-values, as per the energy design. 14. Unconditioned spaces shall comply completely with the lighting requirements found in the energy standards, sections 119, 130-132, 143(c), 146-148. (Interior lighting, outdoor lighting, and signs) 15. Specify the following mandatory measures and provide the electrical design for the exterior lighting: • All outdoor luminaries with lamps rater over 100 watts must have a lamp efficacy of at least 60 lumens/watt or be controlled by a motion sensor. (mercury vapor & large incandescent do not comply) • Cut-off shielding for outdoor luminaries rated greater than 175 watts. • The method of providing automatic shut-off controls (and) • The method of providing multilevel switching. 16. Include complete exterior site lighting calculations to show compliance with the maximum illumination levels for general site illumination and for specific lighting application locations. (Lighting FormsOLTG) 17. The corrected, completed and signed LTG-1-C and OLTG-1C forms must be imprinted on the plans. 18. Show on the plans compliance with the residential energy lighting requirements (Mandatory requirement): • Outdoor lighting fixtures that are attached to a building are required to be high efficacy or controlled by a combination photo-control/motion sensor. • Note: Generally a high efficacy style of fixture is fluorescent, complete with electronic ballasts. Regular incandescent, quartz halogen and halogen MR lamps do not comply. "-· ----------------------------------------------~ ·' . \ ' Carlsbad PC13-0030 5/17/13 19. Common use areas in multifamily buildings require high efficacy fixture types or control shall be by occupancy sensors. 20. Residential ventilation requirements: • Mechanical whole house ventilation must be provided. Include the following information: Fan sizing (CFM), "Sone" specification, and the duct sizing and length. Note: The information must match or exceed the design found on CF-6R-MECH energy forms. • All fans installed to meet the preceding requirements must be specified at a noise rating of a maximum 1 "Sane" (for the continuous use calculation) or 3 "Sane" (for the intermittent use calculation) 21. Duct sealing (Requiring certified HERS inspection) is required (Prescriptive Method) for all climate zones. (Specify on the plans the required inspection or what the approved alternate to the required inspection will be, if desired.). Note: If you have any questions regarding this Electrical and Energy plan review list please contact Morteza Beheshti at (858) 560-1468. To speed the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans. LHD45 -linear High Definition Series Sophisticated Fires This modern, linear gas fireplace offers a sophisticated, "widescreen" fire element. The LHD45 comes standard with Napoleon's exclusive Topaz CRYSTALINE"" ember bed that sparkles with a luxurious glow. To create a dramatic mix, optional river rocks, coloured glass, driftwood log set and designer fire art are available to replace or enhance the Topaz CRYSTALINE" ember bed. LHD45 24,000 BTU's 46 W'w x 19"h as shown on page 19 Natural gas or propane For more detailed specifications on this unit, see page 34 Options & Accessories ~ro~,~ Glass Media Enhancement Kits Four Colours Available· ...... ~,.., .. ,,,, Premium Four-Sided Surround Brushed Stainless Steel Finish _vt!..tthl.~1.l<l.!. "'''u' 1 (COif Stylo"linear Glass Front • • '8 i "Refer to options & accessories section on pages 2B-31 for more details Designer Fire Art Metal Coil Design ··~"¥11•·'" Basic Four-Sided Surround Painted Flat Black Finish Designer Fire Art Nickel Stix Design ' Deluxe Four-Sided Surrounds Three Colour Options* Driftwood Media Kit (logs, sand, vermiculite and six river rocks indudedl .. ~ .. tn~~o,., .• '"· .. l·.·_: I··'""' ... -... -·.· .. / ·. .· .·.~ -...;1 GEO Shapes Media Enhancement Kit F45 & F60 Remote Controls On/off or thermostatic 1 m }(j ELECTRICAL CONNECTION -----···-·····. ·····················-·--· I Venting ................... I -------------r··------,-------------------------------------------------..... -------r--·-·-Model BTU's (Input) Height Front Width Depth Gloss Gloss Size Viewing Area Efficiencies Blower Mobile Home Ele<tronil: Type i (sq. in.) Certified ! lgnnion Natural Gas Propane Actual Framing Actual Framing Actual Framing Height I Width EnerGuide AFUE Steady State H081 60,000 50,000 Top 40 3/8" 491/4" I 39" 54 3/4" 24 5/8" 23 5/8" Ceramic 30 3/4" 1 36 3/4" 1 2260 65% 68% 67% Optional Yes Yes Certified under Canadian and American National standards: CSA 2.33, ANSI 221.88 for vented gas fireplace heaters. I Model I Height Front Width Depth Glass Gloss Size Efficiencies Blower Mobile Home Electronic i BTU's (Input) Venting Viewing Area ~--···-···················· ------------·--·-·-·--····-··---··-··· Type -------------------------~ (sq. in.) ---·-······--······ Certified lgnmon I I I Natural Gas T - Propane Actual Framing Actual Framing Actual Framing Height Width EnerGuide AFUE i Steady State I LH045 I 24,000 24,000 Top 4013/16" 411/4" 46 1/4" 46 3/4" 19 7 /8" 20 1/8" Tempered 17 3/4" 411/2" 737 52% I 72% Optional Yes Yes Certified under Canadian rmd American National standards: CSA 2.22, ANSI Z21.50 for vented gas fireplaces. One sided Two sided One sided 1\ ,., _r d~ -! ii 1n•~ ,::,~1 I ::::: ~ ~~.~ I'"_[_ ju1.1•· •· •. L mcS:1117' ,. L· IIILH l31/J" I!L!1;~ICJI.L 1311r Model [ BTU's (Input) Venti~~ -----;~ht Front Width Depth Glass ·-·-· Gloss Size Viewing Area . ---·--······ Efficiencies Blower !M~bile-Home I Electr;;;-· ; Type (sq. in.) J Certified Ignition 1 Natural Gas Propane Actual Framing Actual Framing Actual Framing Height Width EnerGuide AFUE Steady State ------·---~-········-······---··-···········--······-·--···-··-·-··-·--···--·····--r-·-···-.... ·······················-··--····--····-·····-···· ···············-····--··-·-·-·-·······-··-·----- LH050 ~,000 30,000 Top 60" 60 1/2" I 67 3/8" 677 /8" 231/2" 23 3/4" Ceramic 14 1/2" 48" 696 56.4% 79% N/A I Yes Yes ~~;~? I 30,000 30,000 Top 60" 60 1/2" i 67 3/8" 67 7/8" 131/2" 131/2" Ceramic 141/2" 48" 1392 56.4% 79% N/A I Yes Yes -··-·-.......•...... --·-··-········-·-···-·-··-·l_"_'_ __ ----··-·--·-. ········-·····-------------···-·----·-----·-···-······-·-·····--·· ----·-··---·- .. Certified ~;nder Canadian and American National standards: CSA 2.22, ANSI Z21.50 for vented gas fireplaces. .. "3-<~ Figures may vary with individual conditions such as floor plan layout, insulation value/heat loss of the house and geographical location. Measurements to be used as o guide only. Consult your owner's manual for complete and up-to-dote installation instrlictions and proper clearances to combustible materials . ' ' INSTALLER: LEAVE THIS MANUAL WITH THE APPLIANCE. CONSUMER: RETAIN THIS MANUAL FOR FUTURE REFERENCE. NEVER LEAVE OR AT RISK ALONE WITH CERTIFIED FOR CANADA AND UNITED STATES USING ANSI/CSA METHODS. SAFETY INFORMATION If the information in these instructions are not followed exactly, a fire or explosion may result causing property damage, personal injury or loss of life. -Do not store or use gasoline or other flammable vapors and liquids in the vicinity of this or any other appliance. -WHAT TO DO IF YOU SMELL GAS: • Do not try to light any appliance. • Do not touch any electrical switch; do not use any phone in your building. • Immediately call your gas supplier from a neighbour's phone. Follow the gas supplier's instructions. • If you cannot reach your gas supplier, call the fire department. -Installation and service must be performed by a qualified installer, service agency or the supplier. This appliance may be installed in an aftermarket, permanently located, manufactured home (USA only) or mobile home, where not prohibited by local codes. This appliance is only for use with the type of gas indicated on the rating plate. This appliance is not convertible for use with other gases, unless a certified kit is used. 'NATURAL GAS 0. HOT GLASS WILL CAUSE BURNS. DO NOT TOUCH GLASS UNTIL COOLED. NEVER ALLOW CHILDREN TO TOUCH GLASS. 9001-2008 lntertek IJ fl l I! )4 "Lqi l ;I~ q "<rr!P r:r-.J '4~1 'lt~0 r-: ) • 1 1 I '1 r , 't 't , t< v ,: , , r !· 1 "~ I I J (.' ';<--"IL. I 1X ( 1):)) L.2 UlJ3'. ;.~ i11f)U1eOrlflrep1Ch~t ::>ll)i • as~ ~ h ) !'IIJ udu~.....-ts COfll $10.00 --------------------1.28C W415-0834/ 0/09.07.12 Carlsbad PC13-0030 5/17/13 [DO NOT PAY-THIS IS NOT AN INVOICE] VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE ( Bldg #1 ) JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: PC13-0030 PREPARED BY: Chuck Mendenhall DATE: 5/17/13 BUILDING ADDRESS: 2303 Ocean St BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R-3 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VB BUILDING AREA Valuation Reg. VALUE ($) PORTION ( Sq. Ft.) Multiplier Mod. dwellings 5783 110.17 637,113 Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE 637,113 Jurisdiction Code cb By Ordinance Bldg. Permit Fee by Ordinance ..... $2,721.781 Plan Check Fee by Ordinance $1,769.161 Type of Review: Complete Review 0 Structural Only 0Repettive Fee ""' Repeats 0 Other 0 Hourly EsGil Fee 1------11 Hr. @ • $1,524.201 Comments: Sheet 1 of 14 macvalue.doc + Carlsbad PC13-0030 5/17/13 [DO NOT PAY-THIS IS NOT AN INVOICE} VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE ( Bldg #2 ) JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: PC13-0030 PREPARED BY: Chuck Mendenhall DATE: 5/17/13 BUILDING ADDRESS: 2303 Ocean St BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R-3 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VB BUILDING AREA Valuation Reg. VALUE ($) PORTION ( Sq. Ft.) Multiplier Mod. dwellings 5826 110.17 641,850 Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE 641,850 JUiisdiction Code cb By Ordinance Bldg. Permit Fee by Ordinance $2,735.061 Plan Check Fee by Ordinance $1,777.791 Type of Review: Complete Review D Structural Only 0Repetl:ive Fee .. Repeats D Other 0 Hourly EsGil Fee 1------11 Hr. @ • $1,531.631 Comments: Sheet 2 of 14 macvalue.doc + Carlsbad PC13-0030 5/17/13 [DO NOT PAY-THIS IS NOT AN INVOICE] VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE ( Bldg #3 ) JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: PC13-0030 PREPARED BY: Chuck Mendenhall DATE: 5/17/13 BUILDING ADDRESS: 2303 Ocean St BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R-3 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V B BUILDING AREA Valuation Reg. VALUE ($) PORTION ( Sq. Ft.) Multiplier Mod. dwellings 5842 110.17 643,613 Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE 643,613 Jurisdiction Code cb By Ordinance Bldg. Permit Fee by Ordinance $2,741.701 Plan Check Fee by Ordinance .... $1,782.111 Type of Review: Complete Review D Structural Only 0Repetl:ive Fee ,. Repeats D Other 0 Hourly EsGil Fee 1------11 Hr. @ • $1,535.351 Comments: Sheet 3 of 14 macvalue.doc + Carlsbad PC13-0030 5/17/13 [DO NOT PAY-THIS IS NOT AN INVOICE] VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE ( Bldg #4 ) JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: PC13-0030 PREPARED BY: Chuck Mendenhall DATE: 5/17/13 BUILDING ADDRESS: 2303 Ocean St BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R-3 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V B BUILDING PORTION dwellings Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE Jurisdiction Code cb Bldg. Permit Fee by Ordinance Plan Check Fee by Ordinance Type of Review: 0Repettive Fee .,.. Repeats Comments: AREA Valuation ( Sq. Ft.) Multiplier 5834 110.17 By Ordinance Complete Review 0 Other 0 Hourly EsGil Fee Reg. VALUE Mod. 0 Structural Only 1-------11 Hr. @ • ($) 642,732 642,732 $2,738.381 $1,779.951 $1,533.491 Sheet 4 of 14 macvalue.doc + Carlsbad PC13-0030 5/17/13 [DO NOT PAY-THIS IS NOT AN INVOICE] VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE ( Bldg #5 ) JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: PC13-0030 PREPARED BY: Chuck Mendenhall DATE: 5/17/13 BUILDING ADDRESS: 2303 Ocean St BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R-3 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V B BUILDING AREA Valuation Reg. VALUE ($) PORTION ( Sq. Ft.) Multiplier Mod. lings 5834 110.17 642,732 Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE 642,732 Jurisdiction Code cb By Ordinance Bldg. Permit Fee by Ordinance $2,738.381 Plan Check Fee by Ordinance .... $1,779.951 Type of Review: Complete Review D Structural Only 0Repetitive Fee """ Repeats D Other 0 Hourly EsGil Fee ...._----11 Hr. @ • $1,533.491 Comments: Sheet 5 of 14 macvalue.doc + '""-------------------------------------·· ~--------··· Carlsbad PC13-0030 5/17/13 [DO NOT PAY-THIS IS NOT AN INVOICE} VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE ( Bldg #6 ) JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: PC13-0030 PREPARED BY: Chuck Mendenhall DATE: 5/17/13 BUILDING ADDRESS: 2303 Ocean St BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R-3 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VB BUILDING AREA Valuation Reg. VALUE ($) PORTION ( Sq. Ft.) Multiplier Mod. dwellings 6087 110.17 670,605 Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE 670,605 Jurisdiction Code cb By Ordinance Bldg. Permit Fee by Ordinance $2,831.341 Plan Check Fee by Ordinance $1,840.371 Type of Review: Complete Review 0 Structural Only 0Repetl:ive Fee ""' Repeats 0 Other 0 Hourly EsGil Fee 1-------11 Hr. @ • $1,585.551 Comments: Sheet 6 of 14 macvalue.doc + Carlsbad PC13-0030 5/17/13 [DO NOT PAY-THIS IS NOT AN INVOICE] VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE ( Bldg #7 ) JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: PC13-0030 PREPARED BY: Chuck Mendenhall DATE: 5/17/13 BUILDING ADDRESS: 2303 Ocean St BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R-3 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V B BUILDING AREA Valuation Reg. VALUE ($} PORTION ( Sq. Ft.) Multiplier Mod. dwellings 6054 110.17 666,969 Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE 666,969 Jurisdiction Code cb By Ordinance Bldg. Permit Fee by Ordinance $2,818.061 Plan Check Fee by Ordinance $1,831.741 Type of Review: Complete Review D Structural Only 0Repetl:ive Fee .,. Repeats D Other 0 Hourly EsGil Fee 1------fl Hr. @ • $1,578.111 Comments: Sheet 7 of 14 macvalue.doc + Carlsbad PC13-0030 5/17/13 [DO NOT PAY-THIS IS NOT AN INVOICE] VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE ( Bldg #8 ) JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: PC13-0030 PREPARED BY: Chuck Mendenhall DATE: 5/17/13 BUILDING ADDRESS: 2303 Ocean St BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R-2 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V B BUILDING AREA Valuation Reg. VALUE ($) PORTION ( Sq. Ft.) Multiplier Mod. dwellings 9713 98.20 953,817 Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE 953,817 Jurisdiction Code cb By Ordinance Bldg. Permit Fee by Ordinance $3,770.901 Plan Check Fee by Ordinance $2,451.091 Type of Review: Complete Review 0 Structural Only 0RepeU:ive Fee ...,. Repeats 0 Other 0 Hourly EsGil Fee 1------fl Hr @ • $2,111.701 Comments: Sheet 8 of 14 macvalue.doc + Carlsbad PC13-0030 5/17/13 [DO NOT PAY-THIS IS NOT AN INVOICE] VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE ( Bldg #9 ) JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: PC13-0030 PREPARED BY: Chuck Mendenhall DATE: 5/17/13 BUILDING ADDRESS: 2303 Ocean St BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R-2, B TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VB BUILDING AREA Valuation Reg. VALUE ($) PORTION ( Sq. Ft.) Multiplier Mod. dwellings 4762 98.20 467,628 fitness ctr 2027 81.43 165,059 Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE 632,687 Jurisdiction Code cb By Ordinance Bldg. Permit Fee by Ordinance $2,705.181 Plan Check Fee by Ordinance .... $1,758.371 Type of Review: Complete Review D Structural Only 0Repetl:ive Fee .,.. Repeats D Other 0 Hourly EsGil Fee 1-------~IH'.@ · $1,514.901 Comments: Sheet 9 of 14 macvalue.doc + i!w"'IM· -----------------------------·-·' I Carlsbad PC13-0030 5/17/13 [DO NOT PAY-THIS IS NOT AN INVOICE] VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE ( Bldg# 10 ) JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: PC13-0030 PREPARED BY: Chuck Mendenhall DATE: 5/17/13 BUILDING ADDRESS: 2303 Ocean St BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R-2 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V B BUILDING AREA Valuation Reg. VALUE ($) PORTION ( Sq. Ft.) Multiplier Mod. dwellings 8758 98.20 860,036 Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE 860,036 Jurisdiction Code cb By Ordinance Bldg. Permit Fee by Ordinance $3,462.141 Plan Check Fee by Ordinance $2,250.391 Type of Review: Complete Review D Structural Only 0Repetl:ive Fee .. Repeats D Other 0 Hourly EsGil Fee t-------11 Hr. @ • $1,938.801 Comments: Sheet 10 of 14 macvalue.doc + t•!lilii'' __________________ .....,. ____________ j Carlsbad PC13-0030 5/17/13 [DO NOT PAY-THIS IS NOT AN INVOICE] VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE ( Bldg #12 ) JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: PC13-0030 PREPARED BY: Chuck Mendenhall DATE: 5/17/13 BUILDING ADDRESS: 2303 Ocean St BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R-2 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VB BUILDING PORTION dwellings Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE Jurisdiction Code cb Bldg. Permit Fee by Ordinance Plan Check Fee by Ordinance Type of Review: 0Repetitive Fee .. Repeats Comments: AREA Valuation ( Sq. Ft.) Multiplier 9218 98.20 By Ordinance Complete Review D Other 0 Hourly EsGil Fee Reg. VALUE Mod. D Structural Only t------tl Hr. @ • ($) 905,208 905,208 $3,611.541 $2,347.501 $2,022.461 Sheet 12 of 14 macvalue.doc + ...,_----------------------------~~-.~·· I Carlsbad PC13-0030 5/17/13 [DO NOT PAY-THIS IS NOT AN INVOICE] VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE ( Bldg #13 ) JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: PC13-0030 PREPARED BY: Chuck Mendenhall DATE: 5/17/13 BUILDING ADDRESS: 2303 Ocean St BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R-3 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V B BUILDING PORTION dwellings Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE Jurisdiction Code cb Bldg. Permit Fee by Ordinance Plan Check Fee by Ordinance Type of Review: 0Repetl:ive Fee .,. Repeats Comments: AREA Valuation ( Sq. Ft.) Multiplier 4304 110.17 By Ordinance .... Complete Review 0 Other Hourly ~sGil Fee Reg. VALUE Mod. 0 Structural Only 1------11 Hr. @ • ($) 474,172 474,172 $2,165.621 $1,407.651 $1,212.751 Sheet 13 of 14 macvalue.doc + Carlsbad PC13-0030 5/17/13 [DO NOT PAY-THIS IS NOT AN INVOICE] VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE ( Parking Garage ) JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: PC13-0030 PREPARED BY: Chuck Mendenhall DATE: 5/17/13 BUILDING ADDRESS: 2303 Ocean St BUILDING OCCUPANCY: S-2 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: I A BUILDING AREA Valuation Reg. VALUE ($) PORTION ( Sq. Ft.) Multiplier Mod. Parking tgarage 33436 58.68 1,962,024 Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE 1,962,024 Jurisdiction Code cb By Ordinance Bldg. Permit Fee by Ordinance .... $6,044.721 Plan Check Fee by Ordinance $3,929.071 Type of Review: Complete Review D Structural Only 0Repetl:ive Fee ""' Repeats D Other 0 Hourly EsGil Fee 1------il Hr. @ • $3,385.041 Comments: Sheet 14 of 14 macvalue.doc + ~ «( ~ CITY OF CARLSBAD PLAN CHECK REVIEW TRANSMITTAL DATE: 05/15/13 PROJECT NAME: OCEAN STCONDOS PLAN CHECK NO: 1 SET#: 1 ADDRESS: 2303 OCEAN ST RY CONDOS CT05-12 CDP 05-28 Community & Economic Development Department 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 www .carlsbadca.gov PROJECT ID: PC 13-30 APN: 203-010-12/15 1s plan check ~ iew is complete and has been APPROVED by the ENGINEERING X ~<f/'1 ~~~~cfp Division is required Xves~ Division. By: f( A Finallnspection by the This plan check review is NOT COMPLETE. Items missing or incorrect are listed on the attached checklist. Please resubmit amended plans as required. ONLY ITEMS MARKED 'X' NEED CORRECTION/CLARIFICATION Plan Check Comments have been sent to: SHAWN®ZEPHYRPARTNERS-RE-COM You may also have corrections from one or more of the divisions listed below. Approval from these divisions may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Resubmitted plans should include corrections from all divisions. For questions or clarifications on the attached checklist please contact the following reviewer as marked: Gina.Ruiz@carlsbadca.gov Remarks: /' Kathleen Lawrence 760-602-27 41 Kath I een. Lawrence@ca rlsbadca.gov Linda.Ontiveros@carlsbadca.gov Dominic.Fieri@carlsbadca.gov 1 SLIP SHEET IN PlANCK SIGNED APPROVED GRADING PlANS DWG476-9A WHEN COMPLETED Will BE SHOWN ON APPROVED PLANS E-36 Set# ~ Any outstanding issues will be marked with i X ; . Make the necessary corrections for compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to the Building division for re-submittal to the Engineering division. Items that conform to permit requirements are marked with:" {"i 1. SITE PLAN Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow Existing & proposed structures Existing street improvements Property lines (show all dimensions) Easements Right-of-way width & adjacent streets Show on site plan: Drainage patterns Driveway widths Existing or proposed sewer lateral Existing or proposed water service Submit on signed approved plans: DWG No. 476-9A Building pad surface drainage must maintain a minimum slope of one percent towards an adjoining street or an approved drainage course. ···~-·J ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE: "Finish grade will provide a minimum positive drainage of 2% to swale 5' away from building". Existing & proposed slopes and topography Size, location, alignment of existing or proposed sewer and water service(s) that serves the project. Each unit requires a separate service; however, second dwelling units and apartment complexes are an exception. Sewer and water laterals should not be located within proposed driveways, per standards. Include on title sheet: Site address Assessor's parcel number Legal description/lot number For commercial/industrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, include: total building square footage with the square footage for each different use, existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing, warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved. Show all existing use of SF and new proposed use of SF. Example: Tenant improvement for 3500 SF of warehouse to 3500 SF of office. LoUMap No.: CT 05-12 Subdivision!Tract: Reference No(s): Page 2 of6 REVG/01/12 RESO 6393, 6394 6395,6396 CT 05·12 FINAL MAP NEEDS APPROVED AND RECORDED DWG 476·9 NEEDS SIGNED AND APPROVED E-36 Set# 2. DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE Project does not comply with the following engineering conditions of approval for project no.: COMPLETE ALL ENGINEERING CONDITIONS. 3. DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS Dedication for all street rights-of-way adjacent to the building site and any storm. drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and for remodels with a value at or exceeding$ 20.000.00 , pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.030. For single family residence, easement dedication will be completed by the City of Carlsbad, cost $605.00. Dedication required as follows: 4. IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the construction exceeds $100.000.00, pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.040. Public improvements required as follows: Construction of the public improvements must be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title report or current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $ 441 no so we may prepare the necessary Neighborhood Improvement Agreement. This agreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the city prior to issuance of a building permit. Future public improvements required as follows: Page 3 of 6 REVS/30/10 1 GR 13-09 GRADING PLANS-- DWG 476-9A NEEDS SIGNED AND APPROVED E-36 Set# 1 5. GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS The conditions that require a grading permit are found in Section 15.16 of the Municipal Code. LJinadequate information available on site plan to make a determination on grading requirements. Include accurate grading quantities in cubic yards (cut, fill, import, export and remedial). This information must be included on the plans. If no grading is proposed write: "NO GRADING" Grading Permit required. NOTE: The grading permit must be issued and rough grading approval obtained prior to issuance of a building permit. Graded Pad Certification required. (Note: Pad certification may be required even if a grading permit is not required.) All required documentation must be provided to your Engineering Construction Inspector The inspector will then provide the engineering counter with a release for the building permit. No grading permit required. Minor Grading Permit required. See attached marked-up submittal checklist for project- specific requirements. 6. MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS LJRIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in city right-of-way and/or private work adjacent to the public right-of-way. Types of work include, but are not limited to: street improvements, tree trimming, driveway construction, tying into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities. Right-of-way permit required for: Page4 of6 REV 6/01/12 1 sw 13-10 SWMP 13-01 E-36 Set# 1 7. STORM WATER Construction Compliance Project Threat Assessment Form complete. Enclosed Project Threat Assessment Form incomplete. Requires Tier 1 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan. Please complete attached form and return (SW ) Requires Tier 2 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan. Requires submittal of Tier 2 SWPPP, payment of processing fee and review by city. Post-Development (SUSMP) Compliance Storm Water Standards Questionnaire complete. Storm Water Standards Questionnaire incomplete. Please make the corrections, re-sign the questionnaire and resubmit with next submittal. Project is subject to Standard Storm Water Requirements. See city Standard Urban Storm Water Management Plan (SUSMP) for reference. http://www.carlsbadca.gov/business/building/Documents/EngStandsw-stds-vol4-ch2.pdf Project needs to incorporate low impact development strategies throughout in one or more of the following ways: Rainwater harvesting (rain barrels or cistern) Vegetated Roof Bio-retentions cell/rain garden Pervious pavement/pavers Flow-through planter/vegetated or rock drip line Vegetated swales or rock infiltration swales Downspouts disconnect and discharge over landscape Other: Page 5 of6 REV 6/01/12 1 Attachments: E-36 Set# 1 9. WATER METER REVIEW 8. FEES Domestic (potable) Use What size meter is required? Where a residential unit is required to have an automatic fire extinguishing system, the minimum meter size shall be a 1" meter. NOTE: the connection fee, SDCWA system capacity charge and the water treatment capacity charge will be based on the size of the meter necessary to meet the water use requirements. For residential units the minimum size meter shall be 5/8", except where the residential unit is larger than 3,500 square feet or on a lot larger than one quarter (1/4) acre where the meter size shall be%". Required fees have been entered in building permit. Drainage fee applicable Added square feet Added square footage in last two years? Permit No. Permit No. Project built after 1980 yes no yes no Impervious surface > 50% yes no Impact unconstructed facility yes no Fire sprinklers required [Z]yes no (is addition over 150' from center line) Upgrade yes Ono No fees required 10. Additional Comments Engineering Application Storm Water Form Page 6 of6 Right-of-Way Application/Info. Reference Documents II REV6/01/12 Fee Calculation Worksheet ENGINEERING DIVISION CT 05·12 35CONDOS Prepared by: 05/15/13 Address: 2303 OCEAN ST Fees Update by: KML Date: 05/15/13 GEO DATA: LFMZ: I B&T: Bldg. Permit#: PC 13-30 Date: 05/15/13 Fees Update by: Date: EDU CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses. Types of Use: 35 CONDOS Sq.Ft./Units 35 Types of Use: Types of Use: Types of Use: Sq.Ft./Units Sq.Ft./Units Sq.Ft./Units ADT CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses. Types of Use: 35 CONDOS Sq.Ft./Units 35 Types of Use: Types of Use: Types of Use: FEES REQUIRED: Sq.Ft./Units Sq.Ft./Units Sq.Ft./Units EDU's: 35 X 1 = 35 EDU's: CREDIT FOR 50 APTS EDU's: 50 X 1 = <50> EDU's: 0 EDU'S ADT's: 35 X 8 = 280 ADT's: CREDIT FOR 50 APTS ADT's: 50 X 6 = <300> ADT's: 0 ADT'S Within CFD: DYES (no bridge & thoroughfare fee in District #1, reduces Traffic Impact Fee) NO 1. PARK-IN-LIEU FEE:0NW QUADRANT NE QUADRANT 0SE QUADARANT 0SW QUADRANT ADT'S/UNITS: 35 I X FEE/ADT: 6414 I =~9&-~ ~ D 2.TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE: CREDIT GIVEN FOR 50 EXISTING APTS (.f!L~ Y~ 0 ,l'l.- ADT'S/UNITS: 0 I X FEE/ADT: I =$ CREDIT GIVEN --. -+--++- 3. BRIDGE & THOROUGHFARE FEE: DIST. #1 DIST.#2 ADT'S/UNITS: ~ FEE/ADT: 1=$ N/A 4. FACILITIES MANAGEMENT FEE ZONE: 1 ADT'S/UNITS: I X FEE/SQ.FT./UNIT: 5. SEWER FEE CREDIT GIVEN FOR 50 EXISTING APTS I=$ N/A EDU's 0 1 X FEE/EDU: I =$ CREDIT GIVEN BENEFIT AREA: EDU's 1 X FEE/EDU: I =$ N/A 6. DRAINAGE FEES: PLDA: []HIGH MEDIUM LOW ACRES: I X FEE/AC: I =$ PD ON FINAL MAP 7. POTABLE WATER FEES: CREDIT FOR (1) 2 " METER AND CREDIT FOR (1) 1.5 " METER UNITS CODE CONN. FEE METER FEE SDCWA FEE TOTAL #OF UNIT? <37,859> <1,444> < 36,834> (1) 2" METER CONN $22,771 MTR $798 SDCWA $22,495 TREATMENT $863 (1) 1"METER CONN$15,088 MTR$646 SDCWA~TREATMENT..$49& (~ 6({3 3.f7 «~ ~ CITY OF CARLSBAD STORM WATER COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT B-24 Development Services Building Division 1635 Faraday Avenue 760-602-2719 www .carlsbadca.gov I am applying to the City of Carlsbad for the following type(s) of construction permit: 0 Building Permit 0 Right-Of-Way Permit 0 My project is categorically EXEMPT from the requirement to prepare a storm water pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) because it only requires issuance of one or more of the following permit types: Patio/Deck Photo Voltaic Re-Roofing Sign Spa-Factory Sprinkler Electrical Fire Additional FireAiann Fixed Systems Mechanical Mobile Home Plumbing Water Discharge Project Storm Water Threat Assessment Criteria* No Threat Assessment Criteria 0 My project qualifieS as NO THREAT and is exempt from the requirement to prepare a storm water pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) because it meets the "no threar assessment criteria on the City's Project Threat Assessment Worksheet for Determination of Construction SWPPP Tier Level. My project does not meet any of the High, Moderate or Low Th~eat criteria described below. Tier 1 -Low Threat Asse$sment Criteria 0 My project does not meet any of the Significant or Moderate Threat criteria, is not an exempt permit type (See list above) and the project meets one or more of the following criteria: o Results in some soil disturbance; and/or o Includes outdoor construction activities (such as saw cutting, equipment washing, material stockpiling, vehicle fueling, waste stockpiling). Tier 2 -Moderate Threat Assessment Criteria 0 My project does not meet any of the Significant Threat assessment Criteria described below and meets one or more of the following criteria: o Project requires a grading plan pursuant to the Carlsbad Grading Ordinance (Chapter 15.16 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code); or, o Project will result in 2,500 square feet or more of soils disturbance including any associated construction staging, stockpiling, pavement removal, equipment storage, refueling and maintenance areas and project meets one or more of the additional following criteria: o Located within 200 feet of an environmentally sensitive area or the Pacific Ocean, and/or o Disturbed area is located on a slope with a grade at or exceeding 5 horizontal to 1 vertical, and/or o Disturbed area is located along or within 30 feet of a storm drain inlet, an open drainage channel or watercourse, and/or o Construction will be initiated during the rainy season or will extend into the rainy season (Oct. 1 through April 3D). Tier 3 -Significant Threat Assessment Criteria S My project includes clearing, grading or other disturbances to the ground resulting in soil disturbance totaling one or more acres including any associated construction staging, equipment storage, stockpiling, pavement removal, refueling and maintenance areas: and/or 0 My project is part of a phased development plan that will cumulatively result in soil disturbance totaling one or more acres including any associated construction staging, equipment storage, refueling and maintenance areas: or, 0 My project is located inside or within 200 feet of an environmentally sensitive area (see City ESA Proximity map) and has a significant potential for contributing pollutants to nearby receiving waters by way of storm water runoff or non-storm water discharge(s). I certify to the best of my knowledge that the above checked statements are true and correct. I understand and acknowledge that even though this project does not require preparation of a construction SWPP, I must still adhere to, and at all times during construction activities for the permit type(s) check above comply with the storm water best management practices pursuant to Tit/&15 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code and to City Standards. Project Address: Assessor Parcel No. *The City Engineer may authorize minor variances from the Storm Water Threat Assessment Criteria in special circumstances where it can be shown that a lesser or higher Construction SWPPP Tier Level is warranted. 8-24 Owner/Owner's Authorized Agent Name: City Concurrence: By: CYES CNO Page 1 of 1 2.63-010-I'Z. 1 15 "' Tille: Date: Project 10: ~f'6t 3~3o Rev.03/09 «~ ~ CITY OF CONSTRUCTION THREAT ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET FOR DETERMINATION OF PROJECT'S PERCEIVED THREAT TO STORM WATER QUALITY E-33 Development Services land Development Engineering 1635 Faraday Avenue 760-602-2750 www.carlsbadca.gov CARLSBAD Construction Perceived SWPPPTier Construction Threat Assessment Criteria* Threat to Storm Water Level Quality Tier 3 -High Con§truction Thr!i!m A§§!:!§sm~n1 Crit~ria a Project site is 50 acres or more and grading will occur during the rainy season ~ Project site is 1 acre or more in size and is located within the Buena Vista or Agua Hedionda Lagoon watershed, inside or within 200 feet of an environmentally sensitive area (ESA) or discharges directly to an ESA High 0 Soil at site is moderately to highly erosive (defined as having a predominance of soils with Tier3 0 USDA-NRCS Erosion factors kt greater than or equal to 0.4) Site slope is 5 to 1 or steeper ~ Construction is initiated during the rainy season or will extend into the rainy season (Oct. 1 0 through April 30). Owner/contractor received a Storm Water Notice of Violation within past two years Tier 3 -Medium Const!l:!m!Q!J Thre§!t Ass~§§ment Cri~a Medium 0 All projects not meeting Tier 3 High Construction Threat Assessment Criteria Tier ~ High Con§trugiQn Ihr~§!t Ass~smenl Crit!;!ria 0 Project is located within the Buena Vista or Agua Hedionda Lagoon watershed, inside or within 200 feet of an environmentally sensitive area (ESA) or discharges directly to an ESA 0 Soil at site is moderately to highly erosive (defined as having a predominance of soils with USDA-NRCS Erosion factors kt greater than or equal to 0.4) High 0 Site slope is 5 to 1 or steeper Tier2 0 Construction is initiated during the rainy season or will extend into the rainy season (Oct. 1 through April 30). 0 Owner/contractor received a Storm Water Notice of Violation within past two years 0 Site results in one half acre or more of soil disturbance Tier 2 -Medium Construction Threat Assessment Criteria Medium 0 All projects not meeting Tier 2 High Construction Threat Assessment Criteria Tier 1 -Medium ln§QectiQn Threat Assessment Criteria 0 Project is located within the Buena Vista or Agua Hedionda Lagoon watershed, within or directly adjacent to an environmentally sensitive area (ESA) or discharges directly to an ESA 0 Soil at site is moderately to highly erosive (defined as having a predominance of soils with USDA-NRCS Erosion factors kt greater than or equal to 0.4) Medium 0 Site slope is 5 to 1 or steeper Tier 1 0 Construction is initiated during the rainy season or will extend into the rainy season (Oct. 1 through April 30). 0 Owner/contractor received a Storm Water Notice of Violation within past two years 0 Site results in one half acre or more of soil disturbance Tier 1 -Low lnsQection Threat Asses§ment Criteria Low • 0 All projects not meeting Tier 1 Medium Construction Threat Assessment Criteria Exempt -Not Applicable -Exempt *The crty engmeer may authonze mrnor vanances from the constructron threat assessment cnterla rn specral crrcumstances where it can be shown that a lesser or higher amount of storm water compliance inspection is warranted in the· opinion of the city engineer E-33 Page 1 of 1 REV 4/30/10 «~ ~ CITY OF CARLSBAD INSTRUCTIONS: STORM WATER STANDARDS QUESTIONNAIRE E-34 Development Services land Development Engineering 1635 Faraday Avenue 760-602-2750 www.carlsbadca.gov To address post-development pollutants that may be generated from development projects, the City requires that new development and significant redevelopment priority projects incorporate Permanent Storm Water Best Management Practices (BMP's) into the project design per the City's Standard Urban Stormwater Management Plan (SUSMP). To view the SUSMP, refer to the Engineering Standards (Volume 4, Chapter 2) at www.carlsbadca.gov/standards. Initially this questionnaire must be completed by the applicant in advance of submitting for a development application (subdivision, discretionary permits and/or construction permits). The results of the questionnaire determine the level of storm water standards that must be applied to a proposed development or redevelopment project. Depending on the outcome, your project will either be subject to 'Standard Stormwater Requirements' or be subject to additional criteria called 'Priority Development Project Requirements'. Many aspects of project site design are dependent upon the storm water standards applied to a project. Your responses to the questionnaire represent an initial assessment of the proposed project conditions and impacts. City staff has responsibility for making the final assessment after submission of the development application. If staff determines that the questionnaire was incorrectly filled out and is subject to more stringent storm water standards than initially assessed by you, this will result in the return of the development application as incomplete. In this case, please make the changes to the questionnaire and resubmit to the City. If you are unsure about the meaning of a question or need help in determining how to respond to one or more of the questions, please seek assistance from Land Development Engineering staff. A separate completed and signed questionnaire must be submitted for each new development application submission. Only one completed and signed questionnaire is required when multiple development applications for the same project are submitted concurrently. In addition to this questionnaire, you must also complete, sign and submit a Project Threat Assessment Form with construction permits for the project. Please start by completing Section 1 and follow the instructions. When completed, sign the form at the end and submit this with your application to the city. !SECTION 1 NEW DEVELOPMENT Does your project meet one or more of the following criteria: YES NO 1. Housing_ subdivisions of 10 or more dwelling units. Examples: single family homes, multi-family homes, X condominium and apartments 2. Commercial-greater than 1-acre. Any development other than heavy industry or residential. Examples: hospitals; laboratories and other medical facilities; educational institutions; recreational facilities; municipal facilities; commercial X nurseries; multi-apartment buildings; car wash facilities; mini-malls and other business complexes; shopping malls; hotels; office buildin_gs; public warehouses; automotive dealerships; airfields; and other light industrial facilities. 3. Heavy Industrial I Industry-g_reater than 1 acre. Examples: manufacturing plants, food processing plants, metal X working facilities, printing plants, and fleet storage areas (bus, truck, etc.). 4. Automotive repair shop. A facility categorized in any one of Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) codes 5013, X 5014,5541,7532-7534, and 7536-7539 5. Restaurants. Any facility that sells prepared foods and drinks for consumption, including stationary lunch counters and refreshment stands selling prepared foods and drinks for immediate consumption (SIC code 5812), where the X land area for development is greater than 5,000 square feet. Restaurants where land development is less than 5,000 square feet shall meet all SUSMP requirements except for structural treatment BMP and numeric sizing criteria reguirements and hydromodification requirements. E-34 Page 1 of 3 REV 1/14/11 6. 7. 8. 9. ~ ~ CITY OF CARLSBAD STORM WATER STANDARDS QUESTIONNAIRE E-34 Development Services Land Development Engineering 1635 Faraday Avenue 760-602-2750 www.carlsbadca.gov Hillside development. Any development that creates more than 5,000 square feet of impervious surface and is located in an area with known erosive soil conditions, where the development will grade on any natural slope that is X twentv-five oercent (25%) or areater. Envlfl:fmenf!lly S.nsltlve Area CESA( All development located within or direcUy adjacent" to or discharging direCtl to an ESA (where discharges from the development or redevelopment will enter receiving waters within the X ESA), which either creates 2,500 square feet or more of impervious surface on a proposed project site or increases the area of imoerviousness of a orooosed oroiect site 10% or more of its naturally occurring condition. Parlclna lot. Area of 5,000 square feet or more, or with 15 or more parking spaces, and potentially exposed to urban X runoff Streets· roads. highways. and tiJeways. Any paved surface that is 5,000 square feet or greater used for the X transportation of automobiles, trucks, motorcycles, and other vehicles 10. R1,tall fi.asg.tl!l! Outlef§. Serving more than 100 vehicles per day and greater than 5,000 square feet X 11. Coastal Devel()pll!Mt Zoae. Any project located within 200 feet of the Pacific Ocean and (1) creates more than X 2500 square feet of impervious surface or (2) increases impervious surface on property by more than 10%. 12. Mont than 1-fCI! of disturbance. Project results in the disturbance of 1-acre or more of land and is considered a X Pollutant-generating Development Project4• .. 1 EllVIronmentally Sensitive Areas Include but are not limited to all Clean Water Act Section 303(d) 1mpa1red water bodieS, areas des1gnated as Areas of Spec1al Biological Significance by the State Water Resources Control Board (Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin (1994) and amendments); water bodies designated with the RARE beneficial use by the State Water Resources Control Board (Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin (1994) and amendments); areas designated as preserves or their equivalent under the Multi Species Conservation Program within the Cities and County of San Diego; and any other equivalent environmentally sensitive areas which have been identified by the Copermittees. 2 'Dii'KIIy ad~' m..,.lituatiecl within 200 fHt of the Environmem.ly Senlilive Area. 3 'Diacharging directly to' rnean1 outllow tom • drainage conveyance syMem that is composed entir.ly of flows tom the IUbjec:l development or redevelopment site, and not commingled with flow from adjacent lands. 4 Pollutant-generating Development Projects are those projects that generate pollutants at levels greater than background levels. In general, these include all projects that contribute to an exceedance to an impaired water body or which create new impervious surfaces greater than 5000 square feet and/or introduce new landscaping areas that require routine use of fertilizers and pesticides. In most cases linear pathway projects that are for infrequent vehicle use, such as emergency or maintenance access, or for pedestrian or bicycle use, are not considered Pollutant-generating Development Projects If they are built with pervious surfaces or If they sheet flow to surrounding pervious surfaces. INSTRUCTIONS: Section 1 Results; If you answered YES to ANY of the questions above, your project is subject to Priority Development Project requirements. Skip Section 2 and please proceed to Section 3. Check the "meets PRIORITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT requirements• box in Section 3. Additional stonn water requirements will apply per the SUSMP. If you answered NO to ALL of the questions above, then please proceed to Section 2 and follow the instructions. E-34 Page 2 of3 REV 1/14/11 «~ ~ CITY OF CARLSBAD STORM WATER STANDARDS QUESTIONNAIRE E-34 Development Services Land Development Engineering 1635 Faraday Avenue 760-602-2750 www.carlsbadca.gov I SECTION2 SIGNIFICANT REDEVELOPMENT INSTRUCTIONS: Complete the questions below regarding your project YES NO 1. Project results in the disturbance of 1-acre or more of land and is considered a Pollutant-generating Development Project*? INSTRUCTIONS: If you answered NO, please proceed to question 2. If you answered YES, then you ARE a significant redevelopment and you ARE subject to PRIORITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT requirements. Please check the "meets PRIORITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT requirements" box in Section 3 below. 2. Is the project redeveloping an existing priority project type? (Priority projects are defined in Section 1) INSTRUCTIONS: If you answered YES, please proceed to question 3. If you answered NO, then you ARE NOT a significant redevelopment and your project is subject to STANDARD STORMWATER REQUIREMENTS. Please check the "does not meet PDP requirements" box in Section 3 below. 3. Is the work limited to trenching and resurfacing associated with utility work; resurfacing and reconfiguring surface parking lots and existing roadways; new sidewalk; bike lane on existing road and/or routine maintenance of damaged pavement such as pothole repair? Resurfacing/reconfiguring parking lots is where the work does not expose underlying soil during construction. INSTRUCTIONS: If you answered NO, then proceed to question 4. If you answered YES, then you ARE NOT a significant redevelopment and your project is subject to STANDARD STORMWATER REQUIREMENTS. Please check the "does not meet PDP requirements" box in Section 3 below. 4. Will your redevelopment project create, replace, or add at least 5,000 square feet of impervious surfaces on existing developed property or will your project be located within 200 feet of the Pacific Ocean and (1) create 2500 square feet or more of impervious surface or (2) increases impervious surface on the property by more than 10%? Replacement of existing impervious surfaces includes any activity that is not part of routine maintenance where impervious material(s) are removed, exposing underlying soil during construction. INSTRUCTIONS: If you answered YES, you ARE a significant redevelopment, and you ARE subject to PRIORITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT requirements. Please check the "meets PRIORITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT requirements" box in Section 3 below. Review SUSMP to find out if SUSMP requirements apply to your project envelope or the entire project site. If you answered NO, then you ARE NOT a significant redevelopment and your project is subject to STANDARD STORMWATER REQUIREMENTS. Please check the "does not meet PDP requirements" box in Section 3 below. * 0 0 for defimtlon see Footnote 4 on page 2 I SECTION3 QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS lXI My project meets PRIORITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (PDP) requirements and must comply with additional stormwater criteria per the SUSMP and I understand I must prepare a Storm Water Management Plan for submittal at time of application. I understand flow control (hydromodification) requirements may apply to my project. Refer to SUSMP for details. D My project does not meet PDP requirements and must only comply with STANDARD STORMWATER REQUIREMENTS per the SUSMP. As art of these re uirements, I will incor orate low im act develo ment strat ies throu hout m ro·ect. Applicant Information and Signature Box Address: Assessor's Parcel Number(s): 2303 Ocean Street 203-010-12 Applicant Name: Applicant Title: David Wiener, RBF Consulting Civil Engineer Applica~~e: Date: /(' ~ 9/5/12 Project ID: ~ E-34 Page 3 of 3 REV 1/14/11 1 I & ~ CITY OF STORM WATER COMPLIANCE FORM TIER 1 CONSTRUCTION SWPPP E-29 Development Services Land Development Engineering 1635 Faraday Avenue 760-602-2750 www.carlsbadca.gov CARLSBAD This form is required for all pools, retaining walls or whenever a building footprint is enlarged. STORM WATER COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE " My project is not in a category of permit types exempt from the Construction SWPPP requirements ../ My project is not located inside or within 200 feet of an environmentally sensitive area with a significant potential for contributing pollutants to nearby receiving waters by way of storm water runoff or non-storm water discharge(s). ../ My project does not require a grading plan pursuant to the Carlsbad Grading Ordinance (Chapter 15.16 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code) " My project will not result in 2,500 square feet or more of soils disturbance induding any associated construction staging, stockpiling, pavement removal, equipment storage, refueling and maintenance areas that meets one or more of the additional following criteria: • located within 200 feet of an environmentally sensitive area or the Pacific Ocean; and/or, • disturbed area is located on a slope with a grade at or exceeding 5 horizontal to 1 vertical; and/or • disturbed area is located along or within 30 teet of a storm drain inlet, an open drainage channel or watercourse; and/or • construction will be initiated during the rainy season or will extend into the rainy season (Oct. 1 through April 30). I CERTIFY TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE CHECKED STATEMENTS ARE TRUE AND CORRECT. I AM SUBMITIING FOR CITY APPROVAL A TIER 1 CONSTRUCTION SWPPP PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF CITY STANDARDS. I UNDERSTAND AND ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I MUST: (1) IMPLEMENT BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPS) DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICABLE TO MINIMIZE THE MOBILIZATION OF POLLUTANTS SUCH AS SEDIMENT AND TO MINIMIZE THE EXPOSURE OF STORM WATER TO CONSTRUCTION RELATED POLLUTANTS; AND, (2) ADHERE TO, AND AT ALL TIMES, COMPLY WITH THIS CITY APPROVED TIER 1 CONSTRUCTION SWPPP THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE . CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES UNTIL THE CONSTRUCTION WORK IS COMPLETE AND APPROVED BY THE CITY OF CARLSBAD. LJI:>~~ 3 DATE E-29 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION NOTES 1. ALL NECESSARY EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS SHALL BE AVAILABLE ON SITE TO FACILITATE RAPID INSTALLATION OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS WHEN RAIN IS EMINENT. 2. THE OWNER/CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES TO WORKING ORDER TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE CITY ENGINEER AFTER EACH RUN-OFF PRODUCING RAINFALL. 3. THE OWNER/CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE CITY ENGINEERING OR BUILDING INSPECTOR DUE TO UNCOMPLETED GRADING OPERATIONS OR UNFORESEEN CIRCUMSTANCES WHICH MAY ARISE. 4. ALL REMOVABLE PROTECTIVE DEVICES SHALL BE IN PLACE AT THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY WHEN THE FIVE (5) DAY RAIN PROBABILITY FORECAST EXCEEDS FORTY PERCENT (40%). SILT AND OTHER DEBRIS SHALL BE REMOVED AFTER EACH RAINFALL. 5. ALL GRAVEL BAGS SHALL BE BURLAP TYPE WITH 3/41NCH MINIMUM AGGREGATE. 6. ADEQUATE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL AND PERIMETER PROTECTION BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE MEASURES MUST BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED. SPECIAL NOTES Page 1 of 3 PROJECT INFORMATION SiteAddress: ~303 ()(:.EA~ S'IRECI Assessor's Parcel Number: 'ZP3 ·010-1 Vt 5 Project 10:------------- Construction Permit No.:------,--- Estimated Construction Start Date 7( t 3> Project Duration t-{ /I 5" Months Emergency Contact: Name: SI-I.AAJtV HoArn~;(CH 24 hour Phone: 7 bO -2 7 l -l 0 1 ( Perceived Threat to Storm Water Quality 0 Medium ~Low If medium box is checked, must attach a site plan sheet showing proposed work area and location of proposed structural BMPs For City Use Only CITY OF CARLSBAD STANDARD TIER 1 SWPPP Approved By:---------- Date:--------- REV 4/30/10 Erosion Control Tracking Non-Storm Water Waste Management and Materials Sediment Control BMPs Control BMPs BMPs Management BMPs Pollution Control BMPs c:: c:: c:: c c ~ 0 0 "'0 ts C) ti Q) "'0 Q) c:: c:: E c:: E "'0 1/) 0 c:: C) as c:: 16 as .5 ~ '5 a. Q) ~ 1/) e C) .... Q) :s ·e ·:; ~ li as :::E C) ""8..9! c:: Q) I!! I/) c:: 'iS c:: i-a. Q) :E 2: ·c:: C" -~ ~ Best Management Practice a!S c:: as~ e! CD ·c. ·e 8~ C) CD w c:: 0 £ 1/) 0 Q) CD IU ;> (BMP) Description -+ .e E ala as c:: (.) 1/) ~ "'0 a; c:: ~ ~ ~ :8 :8(/) 1-1/) C) CD "i!! c:: "'00) c:: "'0 c:: 1/) :::E g! 1/) 3 e! 23 c as as 3:.6 "'0;>. ~j c:: 0 :::> :::J .sd ~ :::E ,!!:QI 0 ~ CD CI)E C) 0~ CDW ~~ as IU ..9! i~ as 0 Oli 0 c:: CD IU NUl C) CD -8· ~J Iii ·c. ~ "E I!! c ~ Q) E ~ ~ -:::~ .c :=II) :c ·c:: "8 €·6 ~ LL. .... !g -g e.s :c~ ·-"'0 c:: ~ .s ~ "'0 ~ (.) It '5 Q) Q) .em ·;;; .Ill :E c:: c Q) ~ as I!! 0 :!::! Q) .r; .c e! as .se Jl!Ol c7l~ as 0 ~ as .9 0 0 It C) we Ci5 en Cl) (.) u::: C) Cl)> Cl) Cl)a. (1).5 ~a. a. a. :::E :::E Cl) Cl). :x:. (.)::! CASQA Designation -+ ";-cp cp .... .... C? .,. '9 ~ r-. cp 0 .... ~ .... C? ";-cp .... ~ C? .,. '9 ~ cp .... w I .... ci: ch I (.) (.) (.) I w w w w w w I Cl) Cl) Cl) :::E :::E :::E :::E :::E :::E :::E w w w (.) Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) w 1-1-z z z z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Construction Activity w Cl) Grading/Soil Disturbance TrenchinQ/Excavation St DriHing/Borlng Concrete/Asphalt Saw cutting Concrete ftatwork Paving Conduit/Pipe lnstaUation Stucco/Mortar Work Waste DisJ)OSal Staainallav Oo'Nn Area I Equipment Maintenance I and Fueling I Hazardous Substance I Use/Storage Dewatering Site Access Across Dirt Other (list): Instructions: Begin by reviewing the list of construction activities and checking the box to the left of any activity that wiD occur during the proposed construction. Add any other activity descriptions in the blank activity description boxes provided for that purpose and place a check in the box immediately to the left of the added activity description. For each activity descrribed1 pick one or more best management practices (BMPs) from the list located along the top of the form. Then place an X in the box at the place where the activity row intersects with the BMP column. Do this for each activity that was checked off and for each of the selected BMPs selected from the list. For Example -If the project includes site access across dirt, then check the box to the left of "Site Access Across Dirt". Then review the list for something that applies such as "Stabilized Construction Ingress/Egress" under Tracking Control. Follow along the "Site Access Across Dirt" row until you get to the "Stabilized Construction Ingress/Egress" column and place an X in the box where the two meet. As another example say the project induded a stockpile that you intend to cover with a plastic sheet. Since plastic sheeting is not on the list of BMPs, then write in "Cover with Plastic" in the blank column under the heading Erosion Control BMPs. Then place an X in the box where the "Stockpiling" row intersects the new "Cover with Plastic" column. To learn more about what each BMP description means, you may wish to review the BMP Reference Handout prepared to assist applicants in the selection of appropriate Best Management Practice measures. The reference also explains the California Stormwater Quality Assodatlon (CASQA) designation and how to apply the various. selected BMPs to a project. E-29 Page 2 of3 REV 4/30/10 & ~ CITY OF STORM WATER COMPLIANCE FORM TIER 1 CONST~UCTION SWPPP E-29 Develooment Services Land Development Engineering 1635 Faraday Avenue 760-602-2750 www.carlsbadca.gov CARLSBAD This fonn is requli'ed for all pools, retaining walls or whenever a building footprint is enlarged. STORM WATER COMPUANCE CERTIFICATE o/ My project Is .not In a category of permit types exempt from the Construction SWPPP requirements o/ My project is not located Inside or within 200 feet of an environmentally sensitive area with a significant potential for contributing pollutants to nearby receiving waters by way of storm water runoff or non-stonn water discharge(s). / ' o/ My project does not require a grading plan pursuant to the Cartsbad Grading Ordinance (Chapter 15.16 of the Cartsbad Municipal Code) o/ My project will not result In 2"':soo iqu8l'8 feet Or more of soils disturbance Including any associated constrUction staging, stockpiling, pavement • removal, equipment storage, refueling and maintenance areas that meets one or more of the additional foii0Vt'lr1J aiterla: • located wlthtn 200 feet of an environmentally sensitive area or the Pacific Ocean; and/or, • disturbed area is located on a slope with a grade at or exceeding 5 horizontal to 1 vertical; and/or • disturbed area Is located along Or within 30 feet of a stonn dniin Inlet, an open drainage channel or watercotne; and/or • construction wm be Initiated during the rainy season or wiD extend Into the rainy season (Oct. 1 through April 30). I CERTIFY TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE CHECKED STATEMENTS ARE TRUE AND CORRECT. I AM SUBMITTING FOR CITY APPROVAL A TIER 1 CONSTRUCTION SWPPP PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF CITY STANDARDS. I UNDERSTAND AND ACKNCMILEDGE THAT I MUST: (1) IMPLEMENT BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPS) DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTMTIES TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICABLE TO MINIMIZE THE MOBILIZATION OF POLLUTANTS SUCH AS SEDIMENT AND TO MINIMIZE THE EXPOSURE OF STORM WATER TO CONSTRUCTION RELATED POLLUTANTS; AND, (2) ADHERE. TO, AND AT ALL TIMES, COMPLY WITH THIS CITY APPROVED TIER 1 CONSTRUCTION SWPPP THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE ·cONSTRUCTION ACTMTIES UNTIL THE CONSTRUCTION WORK IS COMPLETE AND APPROVED BY THE CITY OF CARLSBAD. R(S)/OWNER'S AGENT NAME (SIGNATURE) 4/:>tJ~ 3 DATE E-29 STORM WAJER POLLUTION PREVENTION NOTES 1. ALL NECESSARY EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS SHALL BE AVAILABLE ON SITE TO FACILITATE RAPID INSTALLATION OF EROSION AND SE~MENT CONTROL BMPS WHEN RAIN IS EMINENT. 2. THE OWNER/CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE All EROSION CONTROL DEVICES TO WORKING ORDER TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE CITY ENGINEER AFTER EACH RUN-OFF PRODUCING RAINFALL. 3. THE OWNER/CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE CITY ENGINEERING OR BUILDING INSPECTOR DUE TO UNCOMPLETED GRADING OPERATIONS OR UNFORESEEN CIRCUMSTANCES WHICH MAY ARISE. 4. ALL REMOVABLE PROTECTIVE DEVICES SHALL BE IN PLACE AT THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY WHEN THE FIVE (5) DAY RAIN PROBABILITY FORECAST EXCEEDS FORTY PERCENT (40%). SILT AND OTHER DEBRIS SHALL BE REMOVED AFTER EACH RAINFALL. 5. ALL GRAVEL BAGS SHALL BE BURLAP TYPE VIIITH 314 INCH MINIMUM AGGREGATE. 6. ADEQUATE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL AND PERIMETER PROTECTION BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE MEASURES MUST BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED. SPECIAL NOTES Page 1 of3 PRQJECT INFORMA!JON Site Address: 7_303 ~AN S'T'lt£~ Assessor's Parcel Number: 'ZP3 -Dio-1 Y. 5 Project ID: ---------- Construction Pennit No.:------:--- ,Estimated Construction Start Date 7/ t 3> 'Project Duration t--( /I 5" Months Emergency Contact: Name: SH.AAJk.l tioAJ-rEtTl-l 24 hour Phone: 7'0-2. 1l -l 01 ( Perceived Threat to Storm Water Quality D Medium ~Low If medium box is checked, must attach a site plan sheet showing proposed work area and location of proposed structural BMPs For City Use Only CITY OF CARLSBAD STANDARD TIER 1 SWPPP Approved By:--------- Date: _____ ....;_ ___ _ REV 4130/10 CITY OF CARLSBAD GRADING INSPECTION CHECKUST FOR PARnAL SrrE RELEASE RECEIVED CITY OF CARLSBAD FEB 24 2014 TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT CM&I DIVISION PROJECTINSPECTOR: .\., ~~ DATE: 2-Zlf-Jtj PROJECT ID C/ Cf5-l () GRADING PERMIT NO. /3 .-oj LOTS REQUESTED FOR RELEASE: I ·11:! kc ct.k\o l ") hlf-\\s o11 ly. N/A = NOT APPLICABLE "= COMPLETE 0 = lncom te or unacceptable 1st 2nd. t---+:::---1 ~-+----1 t--.,...._...__.,_~ tJ/A- 1. Site access to requested lots adequate and logically grouped 2. Site erosion control measures adequate. 3. Overall site adequate for health, safety and welfare of public. 4. Letter from Owner/Oev. requesting partial release of specific lots, pads or bldg. 5. 6. 7. 8. 8%" x 11" site plan (attachment) showing requested lots submitted. Compaction report from soils engineer submitted. (If soils report has been submitted with a previous partial release, a letter from soils engineer referencing the soils report and Identifying specific lots for release shall accompany subsequent partial releases). EOW certification of work done with finish pad elevations of specific lots to be released. Letter must state lot (s) Is graded to within a tenth (.1) of the approved grading plan. Geologic engineer's tetter if unusual geologic or subsurface conditions exist. 9. Fully functional fire hydrants within 500 feet of building combustibles and an all weather roads access to site is required. Partial release of grading for the above stated lots is approved for the purpose of building permit issuance. Issuance of building permits is still subject to all normal City requirements required pursuant to the building permit process. Partial release of the site is denied for the following reasons: Date «~ ~ CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DIVISION BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST P-28 Development Services Planning Division 1635 Faraday Avenue (760} 602-4610 www .carlsbadca .P.ov DATE: August 1, 2013 PROJECT NAME: Ocean Street Residences PROJECT ID: CT 05-12/CP 05- 11/CDP 05-28/CD 12-09 PLA~\i~ NO: PC 13-30 SET#: 3 ADDRESS: 2303 Ocean Street APN: 203-010-12, -15 'f/1 This plan check review is complete and has been APPROVED by the Division. By: A Final Inspection by the Division is required DYes D No You may also have corrections from one or more of the divisions listed below. Approval from these divisions may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Resubmitted plans should include corrections from all divisions. [gl This plan check review is NOT COMPLETE. Items missing or incorrect are listed on the attached checklist. Please resubmit amended plans as required. Plan Check Comments have been sent to: Jim McMenamin For questions or clarifications on the attached checklist please contact the following reviewer as marked: D Chris Sexton D Kathleen Lawrence D Greg Ryan 76()-602-4624 76()-602-27 41 76()-602-4663 Chrls.Sexton@carlsbadca.gov Kathleen.Lawrence@carlsbadca.gov Gregory.Ryan@carlsbadca.gov D Gina Ruiz D Linda Ontiveros D Cindy Wong 76()-602-4675 76()-602-2773 76()-602-4662 Glna.Ruiz@carlsbadca.gov Linda.Ontiveros@carlsbadca.gov Cynthia.Wong@carlsbadca.gov ~ Shannon Werneke D Dominic Fieri 76()-602-4621 D Shannon. Werneke@carlsbadca.gov 76()-602-4664 DQminic.Fieri@carlsbadca.gov Remarks: REVIEW#: 1 2 3 [gl[gl[gl DOD Plan Check No. PC 13-03 Address 2303 Ocean Street Date May 3. 2013 Review#~ Planner Shannon Warneke Phone (760) 602-4621 Type of Project & Use: Demolition of 50 apartments. construction of 50 condominiums Net Project Density: 11.7 DU/AC Zoning: R-3/BAOZ General Plan: RMH Facilities Management Zone: 1 CFD (in/out) #_Date of participation: __ Remaining net dev acres: (For non-residential development: Type of land use created by this permit: __ ) Legend: [gl Item Complete Environmental Review Required: D Item Incomplete -Needs your action YES [gl NO 0 TYPE DATE OF COMPLETION: MND. PC Reso 6393 Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: No (please see attached) Discretionary Action Required: YES [gl NO D TYPE __ APPROVAURESO. NO. 6293-6396 DATE 3/5/08 PROJECT NO. CT 05-12. CP 05-1'1. CDP 05-28 OTHER RELATED CASES: CD 12-09 Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, s_tate conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: See attached Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance Project site located in Coastal Zone? YES ~ NO 0 CA Coastal Commission Authority? YES 0 NO ~ If California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact them at -7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite 103, San Diego, CA 92108-4402; (619) 767-2370 Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt): CDP approved: PC Reso 6396 Habitat Management Plan N/A Data Entry Completed? YES D NO D If property has Habitat Type identified in Table 11 of HMP, complete HMP Permit application and assess fees in Permits Plus (A/P/Ds, Activity Maintenance, enter CB#, toolbar, Screens, HMP Fees, Enter Acres of Habitat Type impacted/taken, UPDATE!) lnclusionary Housing Fee required: YES [gl NO D (Effective date of lnclusionary Housing Ordinance-May 21, 1993.) Data Entry Completed? YES D NO D (A/P/Ds, Activity Maintenance, enter CB#, toolbar, Screens, Housing Fees, Construct Housing Y/N, Enter Fee, UPDATE!) D D D Housing Tracking Form (form P-20) completed: YES D NO D N/A D P-28 Page 2 of 4 07/11 Site Plan: ~~~ Provide a fully dimensional site plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of- way width, dimensional setbacks and existing topographical lines (including all side and rear yard slopes). Provide legal description of property and assessor's parcel number. City Council Policy 44-Neighborhood Architectural Design Guidelines 1. Applicability: YES ~ NO 0 2. Project complies: YES D NOD Zoning: 1. Setbacks: Front: Interior Side: Street Side: Rear: Top of slope: Required 20' Shown 20' Required .1.Q: Shown .1.Q: Required n/a Shown n/a Required 20' Shown 20' Required n/a Shown n/a 2. Accessory structure setbacks: Front: Required __ Shown __ Interior Side: Required .1.Q: Shown .1.Q: Street Side: Required __ Shown __ Rear: Required __ Shown __ Structure separation: Required __ Shown __ 3. Lot Coverage: Required __ Shown 43% 4. Height: Maximum 30' Shown 23-28' 5. Parking: Spaces Required 82 Shown 82 (breakdown by uses for commercial and industrial projects required) Residential Guest Spaces Required 82 Shown 82 Additional Comments See attached OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER DATE P-28 Page 3 of4 07/11 CP 13-30, Plan Check Comments, Review #3 GENERAL 1. Prior to recordation of the final map, the following conditions shall be fulfilled: a. A number of notices (to be prepared by Planning) will need to be recorded. 2. Prior to issuance of the building permit, the inclusionary housing fees shall be paid, to the satisfaction of the City Planner. P-28 Page 4 of4 07/11 ., ': «~~ ~ CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DIVISION BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST P-28 Development Services Planning Division 1635 Faraday Avenue (760) 602-4610 WWW.CilriSbi!dCil.IWV DATE: June 28, 2013 11/CDP 05-28/CD 12-09 PROJECT NAME: Ocean Street Residences PROJECT ID: CT 05-12/CP 05- PLAN CHECK NO: PC 13-30 SET#: 2 ADDRESS: 2303 Ocean Street APN: 203-010-12, -15 D This plan check review is complete and has been APPROVED by the Division. By: A Final Inspection by the Division is required DYes D No You may also have corrections from one or more of the divisions listed below. Approval from these divisions may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Resubmitted plans should include corrections from all divisions. ~ This plan check review is NOT COMPLETE. Items missing or incorrect are listed on the attached checklist. Please resubmit amended plans as required. Plan Check Comments have been sent to: Jim McMenamin For questions or clarifications on the attached checklist please contact the following reviewer as marked: ... ~J1AtiN:ING ENGIN:EIRING f"lil PRWENtiON. 16~024610 760-602-2150 '16~02-4665 D Chris Sexton D Kathleen Lawrence D Greg Ryan 760-602-4624 760-602-27 41 76Q-602-4663 Chris.Sexton@carlsbadca.gov Kathleen.Lawrence@carlsbadca.gov Gregory.Ryan@carlsbadca.gov D Gina Ruiz D Linda Ontiveros D Cindy Wong 76Q-602-4675 76Q-602-2773 760-602-4662 Gina.Ruiz@carlsbadca.gov Linda.Ontiveros@carlsbadca.gov Cynthia.Wong@carlsbadca.gov ~ Shannon Werneke D Dominic Fieri 76Q-602-4621 D Shannon.Werneke@carlsbadca.gov 760-602-4664 Dominic.Fieri@carlsbadca.gov Remarks: REVIEW#: 1 2 3 ~~0 DOD Plan Check No. PC 13-03 Address 2303 Ocean Street Date May 3. 2013 Review#~ Planner Shannon Werneke Phone (760) 602-4621 Type of Project & Use: Demolition of 50 apartments. construction of 50 condominiums Net Project Density: 11.7 DU/AC Zoning: R-3/BAOZ General Plan: RMH Facilities Management Zone: 1 CFD (in/out) #_Date of participation: __ Remaining net dev acres: (For non-residential development: Type of land use created by this permit: __ ) Legend: ~ Item Complete Environmental Review Required: 0 Item Incomplete-Needs your action YES ~ NO 0 TYPE DATE OF COMPLETION: MND. PC Reso 6393 Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: No (please see attached) Discretionary Action Required: YES ~ NO 0 TYPE __ APPROVAL/RESO. NO. 6293-6396 DATE 3/5/08 PROJECT NO. CT 05-12. CP 05-11 I COP 05-28 OTHER RELATED CASES: CD 12-09 Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: See attached Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance Project site located in Coastal Zone? YES 181 NO 0 CA Coastal Commission Authority? YES 0 NO 181 If California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact them at -7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite 103, San Diego, CA 92108-4402; (619) 767-2370 Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt): COP approved: PC Reso 6396 Habitat Management Plan N/A Data Entry Completed? YES 0 NO 0 If property has Habitat Type identified in Table 11 of HMP, complete HMP Permit application and assess fees in Permits Plus (AJP/Ds, Activity Maintenance, enter CB#, toolbar, Screens, HMP Fees, Enter Acres of Habitat Type impacted/taken, UPDATE!) lnclusionary Housing Fee required: YES ~ NO 0 (Effective date of lnclusionary Housing Ordinance-May 21, 1993.) Data Entry Completed? YES 0 NO 0 (A/P/Ds, Activity Maintenance, enter CB#, toolbar, Screens, Housing Fees, Construct Housing Y/N, Enter Fee, UPDATE!) 0 0 0 Housing Tracking Form (form P-20) completed: YES 0 NO 0 N/A 0 P-28 Page 2 of 4 07111 Site Plan: ~~D Provide a fully dimensional site plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of- way width, dimensional setbacks and existing topographical lines (including all side and rear yard slopes). Provide legal description of property and assessor's parcel number. City Council Policy 44-Neighborhood Architectural Design Guidelines 1. Applicability: YES ~ NO 0 2. Project complies: YES D NOD Zoning: 1. Setbacks: Front Interior Side: Street Side: Rear: Top of slope: Required 20' Shown 20' Required .1.[ Shown .1.[ Required n/a Shown n/a Required 20' Shown 20' Required n/a Shown n/a 2. Accessory structure setbacks: Front Required __ Shown __ Interior Side: Required 10' Shown .1.[ Street Side: Required __ Shown __ Rear: Required __ Shown __ Structure separation: Required __ Shown __ 3. Lot Coverage: Required __ Shown 43% 4. Height Maximum 30' Shown 23-28' 5. Parking: Spaces Required 82 Shown 82 (breakdown by uses for commercial and industrial projects required) Residential Guest Spaces Required 82 Shown 82 Additional Comments See attached OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER DATE P-28 Page 3 of4 07/11 CP 13-30, Plan Check Comments, Review #2 GENERAL 1. Prior to recordation of the final map, the following conditions shall be fulfilled: a. A number of notices (to be prepared by Planning) will need to be recorded. 2. Prior to issuance of the building permit, the inclusionary housing fees shall be paid, to the satisfaction of the City Planner. BUILDING PLANS 1. Revise all front yard setback setbacks to recognize the 8-foot dedication along the front property line on ALL site plans (i.e., any plan which references the front property line). Please also note the new front property line. The resulting front yard setback should be 20 feet. 2. Please include a note on the landscape plans that a separate building permit is required for the trash enclosure and the pool equipment building. 3. Repeat comment. Please add details to the dumpster and incorporate a trellis which complements the architectural design of the project. Follow-up comment. Please indicate where the details for the trash enclosure are located within the landscape plan. As noted above, if the trash enclosure is not included in architectural plans, a separate building permit is required for the structure. 4. Repeat comment. Please add details to the pool equipment building and incorporate a trellis which complements the architectural design of the project. Follow-up comment. The landscape plan references the architectural plans for the details of the pool equipment building. Please coordinate with the landscape architect and include details in one of the sets of plans. As noted above, if the pool equipment building is not included in architectural plans, a separate building permit is required for the structure. 5. Repeat comment. Sheet A2. ?a, Podium Slab: please include dimension in between each of the buildings. P-28 Page 4 of 4 07/11 .-' "~ « .. ,.'#£> PLANNING DIVISION BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST P-28 Development Services Planning Division 1635 Faraday Avenue {760) 602-4610 ~ CITY OF CARLSBAD www.carlsbadca.!l'ov DATE: May 17, 2013 PROJECT NAME: Ocean Street Residences PROJECT ID: CT 05-12/CP 05- 11/CDP 05-28/CD 12-09 PLAN CHECK NO: PC 13-30 SET#: 1 ADDRESS: 2303 Ocean Street APN: 203-010-12, -15 D This plan check review is complete and has been APPROVED by the Division. By: A Final Inspection by the Division is required ~Yes D No You may also have corrections from one or more of the divisions listed below. Approval from these divisions may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Resubmitted plans should include corrections from all divisions. ~ This plan check review is NOT COMPLETE. Items missing or incorrect are listed on the attached checklist. Please resubmit amended plans as required. Plan Check Comments have been sent to: Jim McMenamin For questions or clarifications on the attached checklist please contact the following reviewer as marked: D Chris Sexton D Kathleen Lawrence D Greg Ryan 760-602-4624 760-602-27 41 760-602-4663 Chris.Sexton@carlsbadca.gov Kathleen.Lawrence@carlsbadca.gov Gregorv.Ryan@carlsbadca.gov D Gina Ruiz D Linda Ontiveros D Cindy Wong 760-602-4675 760.602-2773 760-602-4662 Gina.Ruiz@carlsbadca.gov Linda.Ontiveros@carlsbadca.gov Cynthia.Wong@carlsbadca.gov ~ Shannon Werneke D Dominic Fieri 760.602-4621 D Shannon.Werneke@carlsbadca.gov 760-602-4664 Dominic.Fieri@carlsbadca.gov Remarks: REVIEW#: 1 2 3 ~DO ~DO ~DO ~DO DOD Plan Check No. PC 13-03 Address 2303 Ocean Street Date May 3. 2013 Review# 1 Planner Shannon Werneke Phone (760) 602-4621 Type of Project & Use: Demolition of 50 apartments. construction of 50 condominiums Net Project Density: 11.7 DU/AC Zoning: R-3/BAOZ General Plan: RMH Facilities Management Zone: 1 CFD (in/out) #_Date of participation: __ Remaining net dev acres: (For non-residential development: Type of land use created by this permit: __ ) Legend: ~ Item Complete Environmental Review Required: D Item Incomplete-Needs your action YES ~ NO 0 TYPE DATE OF COMPLETION: MND. PC Reso 6393 Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: No (please see attached) Discretionary Action Required: YES ~ NO D TYPE __ APPROVAL/RESO. NO. 6293-6396 DATE 3/5/08 PROJECT NO. CT 05-12. CP 05-11 I COP 05-28 OTHER RELATED CASES: CD 12-09 Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: See attached Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance Project site located in Coastal Zone? YES .[8J NO 0 CA Coastal Commission Authority? YES 0 NO .[8J If California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact them at -7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite 103, San Diego, CA 92108-4402; (619) 767-2370 Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt): .. COP approved: PC Reso 6396 Habitat Management Plan N/A Data Entry Completed? YES D NO D If property has Habitat Type identified in Table 11 of HMP, complete HMP Permit application and assess fees in Permits Plus (A/P/Ds, Activity Maintenance, enter CB#, toolbar, Screens, HMP Fees, Enter Acres of Habitat Type impacted/taken, UPDATE!) lnclusionary Housing Fee required: YES ~ NO D (Effective date of lnclusionary Housing Ordinance-May 21, 1993.) Data Entry Completed? YES D NO D (A/P/Ds, Activity Maintenance, enter CB#, toolbar, Screens, Housing Fees, Construct Housing Y/N, Enter Fee, UPDATE!) D D D Housing Tracking Form (form P-20) completed: YES D NOD N/A D P-28 Page 2 of 5 07111 -.. Site Plan: rgj00 DOD Provide a fully dimensional site plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of- way width, dimensional setbacks and existing topographical lines (including all side and rear yard slopes). Provide legal description of property and assessor's parcel number. City Council Policy 44-Neighborhood Architectural Design Guidelines 1. Applicability: YES [gl NO 0 2. Project complies: YES D NOD Zoning: 1. Setbacks: Front: Interior Side: Street Side: Rear: Top of slope: Required 20' Shown 20' Required 1Q: Shown 1Q: Required n/a Shown n/a Required 20' Shown 20' Required n/a Shown n/a 2. Accessory structure setbacks: Front: Required __ Shown __ Interior Side: Required 1Q: Shown 1Q: Street Side: Required __ Shown __ Rear: Required __ Shown __ Structure separation: Required __ Shown __ 3. Lot Coverage: Required __ Shown 43% 4. Height: Maximum 30' Shown 23-28' 5. Parking: Spaces Required 82 Shown 82 (breakdown by uses for commercial and industrial projects required) Residential Guest Spaces Required 82 Shown 82 Additional Comments See attached OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER DATE P-28 Page 3 of 5 07/11 CP 13-30, Plan Check Comments, Review #1 GENERAL 1. Prior to recordation of the final map, the following conditions shall be fulfilled: a. A number of notices (to be prepared by Planning) will need to be recorded; b. Please submit a copy of the recorded Affordable Housing Agreement; and c. Please submit a copy of the draft CC&R's (see PC Resolution No. 6394 for details). 2. Prior to the issuance of the demolition permit, the following conditions/mitigation measures shall be fulfilled: a. Pursuant to Mitigation Measure (MM) #1, please submit a focused avian nesting survey prepared by a qualified biologist. Please see the MM for details on the survey; and b. Pursuant to MM #4, please submit an asbestos investigation and mitigation report detailing the appropriate clean-up and disposal requirements necessary to avoid releasing asbestos into the air. 3. Prior to issuance of the grading permit, the following conditions/mitigation measures shall be fulfilled: a. Pursuant to MM #2, a Native American representative shall be retained to monitor initial grading in the area identified in the geology report as us undocumented fill/alluvium; b. Pursuant to MM #3, a paleontologist shall be retained to review the grading plans and walk the site. A report shall be submitted to Planning prior to the issuance of the grading permit; and c. Please submit the final landscape plan for plan check (a separate application and fee are required). Please ensure that the final design is consistent with the architectural layout. 4. Prior to issuance of the building permit, the inclusionary housing fees shall be paid, to the satisfaction of the City Planner. BUILDING PLANS 1. Sheet CA 1.1: Building 13-it appears that the rear patio, which is above grade, encroaches into the rear yard setback. Please identify the above grade height of the patio as well as the setback from the property line. Please be advised that the patio may need to be reduced in size so it is located outside the setback area. 2. Please identify the dashed setback line and property line on ALL site plans (note required distance and include symbol in legend). 3. Sheet A 1.1, Site Plan: Please remove the monument sign in front of Building 7 from the plans as it requires a separate permit. In addition, please remove reference to site plan keynote 909 as a separate permit is required. As an alternative, please note that a separate sign permit is required. 4. Please add details to the dumpster and incorporate a trellis which complements the architectural design of the project. 5. Please add details to the pool equipment building and incorporate a trellis which complements the architectural design of the project. P-28 Page 4 of 5 07/11 ... / 6. Sheet A2.6a and b, Garage Floor Plan: staff has concerns regarding the excessive depth of a number of parking stalls. Please add storage areas and/or wheel stops to the deeper parking stalls. 7. Sheet A2. ?a, Podium Slab: please include dimension in between each of the buildings. P-28 Page 5 of 5 07111 Af~~,;~ ""'~' '' ~·CITY OF CARLSBAD PLAN CHECK REVIEW TRANSMITTAL BlMLDING DEPT,. f€fiJJ'I"!'\itv & Economic o'Efvefoprrient Department 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 www.carlsbadca.gov DATE: 05/26/2013 PROJECT NAME: OCEAN STREET CONDOS PROJECT ID: PC130031> PLAN CHECK NO: 1 SET#: 1 ADDRESS: 2303 OCEAN ST APN: ~ This plan check review is complete and has been APPROVED by the FIRE Division. By:GR A Final Inspection by the FIRE Division is required ~Yes D No D This plan check review is NOT COMPLETE. Items missing or incorrect are listed on the attached checklist. Please resubmit amended plans as required. Plan Check Comments have been sent to: ZEPHYR PARTNERS You may also have corrections from one or more of the divisions listed below. Approval from these divisions may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Resubmitted plans should include corrections from all divisions. For questions or clarifications on the attached checklist please contact the following reviewer as marked: D Chris Sexton D Kathleen Lawrence C8J Greg Ryan 760-602-4624 760-602-27 41 760-602-4663 Chris.Sexton@carlsbadca.gov Kath leen.lawrence@carlsbadca.gov Gregory.Ryan@carlsbadca.gov D Gina Ruiz D Linda Ontiveros D Cindy Wong 760-602-4675 760-602-2773 760-602-4662 Gina.Ruiz@carlsbadca.gov linda.Ontiveros@carlsbadca.gov Cynthia.Wong@carlsbadca.gov D D D Dominic Fieri 760-602-4664 Dominic.Fieri@carlsbadca.gov Remarks: See Attached i ~~ Carlsbad Fire Department Plan Review Date of Report: Name: Address: Permit#: Job Name: Job Address: Requirements Category: PLANCK , 05-26-2013 SHAWN MONTEITH #130 11750 SORRENTO VALLEY RD SAN DIEGO CA 92121 PC130032 OCEAN ST. CONDOS: DEMO 3 BLDGS 2303 OCEAN ST CBAD PLEASE REVIEW CAREFULLY ALL COMMENTS ATTACHED. Conditions: Cond: CON0006357 BUILDING DEP'fB COP~! Reviewed by: ~·~IV""- CITY OF CARLSBAD FIRE DEPARTMENT-APPROVED: w/ CONDITIONS THIS PROJECT HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED FOR THE PURPOSES OF ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT. THIS APPROVAL IS SUBJECT TO FIELD INSPECTION AND REQUIRED TEST, NOTATIONS HEREON, CONDITIONS IN CORRESPONDENCE AND CONFORMANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE REGULATIONS. THIS APPROVAL SHALL NOT BE HELD TO PERMIT OR APPROVE THE VIOLATION OF ANY LAW. Cond: CON0006358 CFD may elect to use all of part of this complex of structures for training purposes. Please contact Battalion Chief Mike Lopez at 76Q-931-2116 for confirmation. Cond: CON0006359 Strict adherence to California Fire Code Chapter 14 and the attached Carlsbad Fire Department standard shall be followed at all times. Entry: 05/26/2013 By: GR Action: AP SEE STRUCTURAL CALCS SCANNED SEPARATELY 1 , Zephyr Partun AIMNCD 8EOlECIINirAl. 80I.lJ110MJ, INC. 25 109 Jefferson A venue, Suite 200 Murrieta, California 92562 Telephone: (619) 708-1649 fax: (714) 409-3217 11750 Sorrento Valley Road, Suite 130 San Diego, CA 92121 June 19, 2013 PIW 1205-06 Report 1205-06-B-7 Atteadoa: Mr. Jim McMeu•i• Subjeet: Geoteelaaial .Review of Stnadaral Piau Oeeu Street .Residenees (CD ll-89), City of Carlla.d, Calif'onla Gentlemen: Advanced Geotechnical Solutions, Inc., (AGS) has reviewed the structural plans for the subject project. The reviewed pt..s were prepantd by Gouvis Engineering Consulting Group, Inc., ~ dated December 1 t, 2012 with a Delta 1 revision dlted June 5, 2013. The reviewed Struotural.PIIIl set include Sheets SN- 1A and SN-18, SC-200A, SC-2008, SC-201 and SC-202, SC-210 throush SC-215, SC-31 1 tJwush SC- 313, SC-321 through SC-323, SN-2, SN-3, SD-1 throup SD-3, SN-3, PT-1, S-1.1 tbmugh S-1.8, S-l.lA, S-3.1 throush S-3.9, S-3.1A throusb 3.1C, S-1.1 throup 88.3, S-l3.118d Sl3.2. Based upon our review the plans have been prepared in aeneraJ conformance with the recomJMnMtions presented in AGS's referenced JI'C*Chnical reports AGS (2012, 2013a, b, and c) and Geocon (2004). Geologic and aeoteclmical obaervation and testina should be provided throu&hout site development. Changes to the reco.nunendations may be necessary baed on conditions encounlered durifta grading. Advanced Geotecbni<:al Solutions, Inc. appreciates the opportunity t10 prcwidc you with potechnical consultina services and professionlll opinions. If you have any questions, pleMro contact the undersigned at (619) 708-1649. Respectfully Submitted, Advaaced . • Inc. (4)~ (I) Dllllia Olwp AtM.: Jonlllll• Shlpaa (llllail eopy) ORANGE AND LA. COUN11ES (714) 716-5661 INLAND EMPIRE (619) 701-1649 RECEIVED JUN 2 0 2013 CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DIVISION SAN DIEGO AND IMPERIAL COUN11ES (619) 150-3910 -------------------------------~--1 Pl&e2 Raport 1205-06-B-7 Juao19,2013 PIW 120S-06 A.tlwa:«l G.-lllflcQ/ Soltll#wu, Jnc. (211 Jc:) •..... -GeolecMiclll ....... .,.,_, GbCI'I SIIWI /Widat:a (CD 12-19), City ofOJrl,rW Cttl(rMifiut PIW 11DJ-D( .,_, 1'/WlliJ-16-/J-6, Mtly 22." 2013. A.dwlltc«< ~lctll Soltlliolr:l, btc. (201 J6). helblfbttry G.Oieclwlctl/ Jkco-.,_, for Pel'lltMIJie p..,., tllltl "Grrru 1'ttN ", ~ Sllwt ltuklllllca (CD 12-111), City of C~ Cal~ Ptr 1205-06, .,_., PIWJ105---8-5, .April 12, 20/J. A.dwlncttd G.ol«:lllticol SolwtitJtu, hie. (20/JtJ). o,.., Pklll RrMw, lbCM SIJwt ...,._(CD 12- 09), City of Ctii'Wtltl, c./,.,_ (CD 12-IJ9), City of Ctii'IDatl, Cal~ P/W 1205-06, bport PIW1205-0f-B-J, Altrch 19, 2013. A.dwtnt:ed G.Oieclllllca/ Sohtttltm.t. btc. (1012). /fqHRrM to Cycle Rrlid c-nu Otwln Street Ruitleltcu (CD 12-09), Cltyoj'Ctrlsil:ltl. c.ll/&rrtltl, PIW 1205-06, bport PIW1105-66-IJ-2, October JO, 2012. Geoc011 Inc., Geolschllical 1~ 0cawt Strut C~, l.bGft Sllwt tllfd Mollnlaln Yhlw DriN. Carbbad, Cali.fomlo, dt:wd ~ J, 201U (project no. 07353-22-01) RBF COIU'IIllillg, A. IliJUr C~. lkMI Slrat lfuldencu, Tentatm TI'QCt Mop, dated October 8, 2012, Sheets 1 tlrollglr 8 City of Carlsbad, Me1IIOI'tl1fl/uwe CD12-09-0ce• Sl1wt Ruidences r ReYiew, doled OctoiJer 25, 2012 Zephyr Partners 11750 Sorrento Valley Road, Suite 130 San Diego, CA 92121 Attention: Mr. Jim McMenamin ADVANCED GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC. 9707 Waples Street, Suite 150 San Diego, California 92121 Telephone: (619) 708-1649 Fax: (714) 409-3287 RESPONSE July 16, 2013 PIW 1205-06 Report 1205-06-B-8 Subject: Geotechnical Review of Proposed Ocean Street Residences Liquefaction Mitigation and Response to Esgil Review Comments (Carlsbad PC13-0030), City of Carlsbad, California Gentlemen: In accordance to your request Advanced Geotechnical Solutions, Inc. (AGS) has reviewed the proposed ground improvement design prepared by Hayward Baker Geotechnical Construction (2013) and prepared a response to Esgil Review comment (52) regarding design and construction procedures for liquefaction mitigation measures for the northern portion of the project. The following is AGS's response to the reviewer's comments: AGS has reviewed the referenced Stone Column Submittal at Ocean Street Residences (HB 2013). Based upon our review the proposed design and methodology is consistent with the current standard of care and generally meets the liquefaction mitigation recommended in our referenced reports. As is typical for these types of ground improvement mitigation measures the initial design methodology will be verified during the construction process by additional field testing (Cone Penetrometer Soundings (CPT)) and analysis of the data by both AGS and the General Contractors (HB) Licensed Geotechnical Engineer. Typically the procedure for approval will consist of the following: 1. Install initial series of production stone columns by the general Contractor. 2. Installation of the stone columns is performance based and can be modified during construction to meet the design criteria. For this project the performance criteria consists of: mitigation of surface manifestation (loss of bearing, sand boils, and ground cracking); and mitigation of dynamically induced settlement to 1 inch or less utilizing the design earthquake (M=6.9 with site acceleration of a=0.4g). Should testing (CPT) and liquefaction analysis indicate that these design measures are not being met then the depth, spacing, and or diameter of the stone columns will be modified to meet the design criteria. Subsequent CPT testing and analysis would then be conducted to verify that the modification of the stone columns (i.e. depth, spacing, and diameter) has been met. 3. A fmalletter report would be prepared by HB and reviewed by AGS that would summarize the actual construction (location, spacing, and diameter of the stone columns). As part of this fmal submittal a liquefaction and theoretical dynamic settlement analysis would be included. During construction it is the responsibility of the specialty contractor (HB) to insure that the installation of the stone columns is not adversely affecting adjacent properties and improvements. Accordingly, it is incumbent upon the contractor to develop a monitoring plan prior to construction. On similar projects ORANGE AND L.A. COUNTIES (714) 786-5661 INLAND EMPIRE (619) 708-1649 SAN DIEGO AND IMPERIAL COUNTIES (619) 850-3980 Page2 Report 1205-06-B-8 July 16, 2013 PIW 1205-06 these monitoring plans consist of photographic records of the site before and after installation and vibration monitoring. The vibration monitoring methods should be determined by the specialty contractor (HB) prior to stone column installation and approved by the owner and the general contractor. In conclusion, it is AGS's opinion that the preliminary design proposed by Hayward Baker is typical of what we have seen on similar projects for the mitigation of adverse affects of liquefaction. Final design will be dependent upon actual soil conditions encountered during construction and could require modification of the current design. At the conclusion of the stone column installation AGS and Hayward Baker will provide final letters addressing the final design (number, depth, and location of the stone columns installed), liquefaction mitigation measures, and maximum theoretical settlement values. Advanced Geotechnical Solutions, Inc. appreciates the opportunity to provide you with geotechnical consulting services and professional opinions. If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned at (619) 708-1649. Respectfully Submitted, Advanced Geotechnical Solutions, Inc. Distribution: (6) Addressee (I) Dahlin Group AUn.: Jonathan Shapero (email copy) ADVANCED GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC. . . Page3 Report 1205-06-B-8 REFERENCES July 16, 2013 PIW 1205-06 Hayward Baker Geotechnical Construction, Inc. (HB 2013). Stone Column Construction Submittal Soil Improvement Ocean Street Residences (CD 12-09), City of Carlsbad, California, July 15, 2013. Esgil Corporation, Plan Check Review Comments, Multi Family Condominium Complex and Parking Garage, 23030cean Street, Carlsbad California, dated July 3, 2013. Advanced Geotechnical Solutions, Inc. (2013d). Geotechnical Review of Structural Plans Ocean Street Residences (CD 12-09), City of Carlsbad, California, PIW 1205-06, Report PIW1205-06-B-7, June 19,2013. Advanced Geotechnical Solutions, Inc. (2013c). Supplemental Geotechnical Recommendations Ocean Street Residences (CD 12-09), City of Carlsbad, California, P/W 1205-06, Report P/W1205-06-B-6, May 22, 2013. Advanced Geotechnical Solutions, Inc. (2013b). Preliminary Geotechnical Recommendations for Permeable Pavers and "Grass Pave", Ocean Street Residences (CD 12-09), City of Carlsbad, California, PIW 1205-06, Report PIW1205-06-B-5, Apri/12, 2013. Advanced Geotechnical Solutions, Inc. (2013a). Grading Plan Review, Ocean Street Residences (CD 12- 09), City of Carlsbad, California (CD 12-09), City of Carlsbad, California, PIW 1205-06, Report PIW1205-06-B-3, March 19, 2013. Advanced Geotechnical Solutions, Inc. (2012). Response to Cycle Review Comments Ocean Street Residences (CD 12-09), City of Carlsbad, California, PIW 1205-06, Report PIW1205-06-B-2, October 30,2012. Geocon Inc., Geotechnical Investigation, Ocean Street Condominiums, Ocean Street and Mountain View Drive, Carlsbad, California, dated September 3, 2004 (project no. 07353-22-01). RBF Consulting, A Baker Company, Ocean Street Residences, Tentative Tract Map, dated October 8, 2012, Sheets 1 through 8. City of Carlsbad, Memorandum CD12-09-0cean Street Residences zui Review, dated October 25, 2012. ADVANCED GEOTECHNICAL SOLVUONS, INC. ....... Zephyr Partaen ADVANmD 8E01BJINI&U. 80UITION8. INC. 25109 Jefferson AYeJWe, Suite 200 Mwrieta, California 92S62 Te~:(619)~1649 Fax:(714)409-3217 11750 Sorrento Valley Road, Suite 130 San Diqo, CA 92121 June 19,2013 PIW 1205-06 Report 1205-06-B-7 Atteatioa: Sabjeet: Gentlemen: Mr. Jim McMeaa.Ua GeotedlaiaJ ReYiew of Stnlehlral Pia• Oeeu Street :a.ideaees (CD ll-89), City of Carts .. d, Califonia Advanced Geotecho.ical Solutions, Inc., (AGS) has roviewod the structwal plans for tho subjeot project. The reviewed plans were prcpued by Oouvis EnBinoerins Consultin& Otovp, Inc., -., dated December It, 2012 with a Delta 1 revision daeed June 5, 2013. The reviewed Structwal Plan set include Sheets SN- 1A and SN-18, SC-200A, SC-2008, SC-201 and SC-202, SC-210dvoup SC-215, SC-311 through SC- 313, SC-321 through SC-323, SN-2, SN-3, SD-1 throoP S~3, SN-3, PT-1, S-1.1 thfOUih S-1.1, S-l.lA, S-3.1 through S-3.9, S-3.1A tbrou&h 3.1C, S-8.1 through Sl.3, S-13.1 and 813.2. Based upon our review the plans have been prepiRCI i1l fii'Mll.) conformance with tbe reconunendations preMnted in AGS's referenced geotechnical reports AGS (2012, 20138, b, and c) and Geocon (2004). GeoJosic and geotechnical observaticll and testing shouW be provided tlvoutlfaout site development. Changes to the recommendations may be necessary based on conditionl enoouotered durin& grading. Advancod Geotecbnical Solutions, Inc. appreciates the opportunity to provide you with pt.echnical consultins services and professional opinions. If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned at (619) 708-1649. (4)AMI:e- (J) Dlltlia 0.0U, MI.: .JoNbn SMpelu (fiMil cottY) ORANGE AND L.A. COUNnES (114) 116-5661 INLAND EMPillE (619) 101-1649 SAN DIEGO AND IMPERIAL COUNTIES (619) 150-3910 ,, ,. ) Ptp2 Report 120S-06-B-7 J-19,2011 PIW l:ZOS-06 ~ O..Citnicol SolwtioJu. lite. (20/Jc). ""',., .. ~ ....__.., l.bGn Slrnt .RaitJMcu (CD 1 2-H), Clly of Orl.rbcr4 c~ 1'/W 121U6. /lqtJrt Mfl 2f.J-06-JJ-6. May 22, 2013 . .A.draltc.J Geol«lwicol Solwlioltl, btc. (201 36). l'reli1lfillory Ge~ lt.co-Mt'ltltlolu for Pe1'1111Jt16/e 1'tlwn Qltt/ "GNu Paw", ac.. Slrwt .Raidace~ (CD 12-111), City of CIII'Wtld, Col~ 1'/W 1205-0f, bpi l'IWJ2tJ5-06-B-5, .A.JI'il 12, 20/.l A.~ Geolecllltlcol SolwtitJM. btc. (2013a). GnJding Plan ReYiflr, (b., Sllwt ltaltilelfCU (CD 12- 09), Clly of CariMHid, Cal~ (CD 12-09), City of Carl86at/, Ctllffon*, 1'/W 1205-06, Report PIWJ205-06-B-3, Mtrcll 1J, 2013 . .A.dwlltt:«l Geoteclaictll SolttlltRu. btc. (2012) . ..,__ to Cycle ...,.., COIIIIItMU Ocun Sltwet .Raitltmca (CD 12-09), CllyofCarhbod, ColljiJrlrkl, PIW 1205-06, bport P/W/205-96-B-2, OctoiMr 30,2012. Geocon l~te., Geotecllnictll ~ Ocean Sttwt COIIdt»>tini111111, lkccM Sltwt tllld MoriJtain Yiew Driw, Carlsbad, Califomis, dat«J Scptelllber 3, 10IU (project 110. 07353-22-01) RBF COMUitbeg, .A. IJt.br COIIIJNIIIY, Ocean Street Rultlmcu, Tentative Tl"t..CC Mop, dattld October 8, 2012, Sheets 1 tlrmch 8 City of Carlsbad, lrh1IIOI'allllwlt CD12-09-0ce1111 Street RaidenceJ ~ JteylfiV, dat«l Octobu 2S, 2012 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ADVANCED GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC. 9707 Waples Street, Suite JSO San Diego, California 92121 Telephone: (619) 701-1649 Fax: (714) 409-3287 Zephyr Partaen 11750 Sorrento Valley Road, Suite 130 San Diego, CA 92121 Attention: Mr. Jila MeMeaamia March 19,2013 PW 1205-06 Report No. 1205-06-B-3 Subject: Gradioa Plaa Review, Oceaa Street Reaideaee~ (CD 12-09), City of Carlsbad, Califerala References: See Appendix Gentlemen: In accordance with your request. presented herein are the results of Advanced Geoteclmic:al Solutions, Inc.'s (AGS) grading plan review for the Ocean Street Residences (CD 12-09), City of Carlsbad, California The original geotechnical investigation was prepared by Geocon, Inc. (01) in September of 2004. Based upon the findings and data presented in this report (01 2004), recent onsite geotechnical investigations conducted by AGS and review of the revised grading plans (sheets 1 through I) prepared by RBF and Associates dated February, 2013, AGS bas prepared this updated 20-scaJe grading plan review . Key geotechnicaVgeologic elements identifiCid onsite that will affect the proposed development and which should be considered in the design and construction of the project include the fOllowing: (• Unsuitable soil removals . + Excavation characteristics of soil and bedrock unit. + Remedial grading adjacent to existing adjacent improvements. + Undercut recommendations for pads, streets and retaining walls . + Grading recommendations . + Liquefaction mitigation measures. + Design offoundations in anticipation of as-graded soil characteristics. RECEIVED JUN 2 0 2013 CITY OF CARLSBA.D BUILDING DIVISION The recommendations presented in this report are besed on the previously conducted subsurface investiption pcdonncd by Gl, associated laboratory testing. AGS's recent~ investiption, and our familiarity with the site. It is AGS's opinion, fiom a geotechnical stEdpoint, thai tile subject site is suitable for constJUction of the proposed multi-family residences and associated improvemoats, provided . the recommendations preSORted in this report are incorporated into the desip, planing and constnaction. Included in this report are: 1) engineering characteristics of the onsite soils; 2) unwitable 10il removal recommendations; 3) srading reoommendations; 4) foundation design recommendations; and 5) liquetiction mitisation recommendations • ORANGE AND L.A. COUNTIES (714) 716-5661 INLAND EMPIRE (619) 701-1649 SAN DIEGO AND IMPERIAL COUNTIES (619) IS0-3910 ~"'"'' • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • M.rch 19,2013 PIW 1205-06 Report No. 1205-06-B-3 Adwneed Geotechnical Solutions, Inc. appreciates the opportunity to provide you with geotechnical consuking services and professional opinions. If you have questions reprdins this report, please contact the undersigned at (619) 701-1649 . Respectfully Submitted, Advanced Geotechnical Solutions, Inc . JEFFREY A. CHANEY, Vice President GE 2314, Reg. Exp. 6-30-11 Distribution: (I) Addressee (3) RBF, Attention David Weiner PAUL DB RISI, Vice President CEO 2536, Reg. Exp. 5-31-11 Attachments: 20-Scale Composite Precise Grading Pt.. (Plate 1) Cross sections AA' -FF' (Plates 2, 3, &: 4) Appendix A-References Appendix B-CPT Logs Appendix C-Boring and Laboratory Test Data (Geocon) Appendix D-General .Earthwork & Grading Guidelines • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ,. I l • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • March 19, 2013 P/W 1205-06 Page 1 Report No. 1205-06-B-3 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 INTRODUCTION Purpose and Background The purpose of this report is to provide geotechnical recommendations for the design and construction of Ocean Street Residences. In preparing this report, AGS has reviewed the enclosed 20-scale precise grading plans provided to by RBF & Associates. Pertinent subsurface information and laboratory data from previous studies are included herein. Scope of Work The scope of our study consisted of the following: ? Review of available geologic and geotechnical literature . ? Review of the previously conducted subsurface investigation performed by Geocon Inc. (GI 2004) . ? Retain Kehoe Testing to conduct three Cone Penetrometer Soundings (CPT-I thru CPT -3) . ? Remedial grading recommendations, including undercuts for building pads and underground improvements . ? Seismic hazard analysis and liquefaction investigation ? Limited slope stability analysis . );> Earthwork specifications . );> Estimation of shrink/sweH parameters of the various onsite earth materials. ? Use of onsite soils as a foundation medium. );> Bearing and friction values . );> Preliminary foundation design . );> Preliminary pavement design . );> Design parameters for both conventional and MSE retaining walls. );> Preparation of this report with appropriate exhibits . Site Location and Description The site encompasses approximately 3.0 acres and is located north of Ocean Street in the City of Carlsbad. The subject site is bounded to the west by a residential (condominium) development, to the north by the Buena Vista Lagoon and a residential structure, to the east by a private drive and to the south by Ocean Street. Currently, the site supports an apartment complex consisting of three separate structures, two parking structures, parking areas, and associated driveways. Relief across the site ranges from 10 MSL on the north side to 41 MSL on the south side. Existing slopes on site range from as steep as 1.5: 1 (horizontal: vertical) to maximum heights of approximately 20 feet. ADVANCED GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC • i \ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ,• • March 19,2013 P/W 1205-06 Page2 Report No. 1205-06-B-3 1.4 2.0 Report Limitations The conclusions and recommendations in this report are based on the data developed during the preliminary site investigation, a review of previously prepared geotechnical studies, and the precise grading plans provided by RBF & Associates . The materials immediately adjacent to, or beneath those observed in the exploratory excavations may have different characteristics and no representations are made as to the quality or extent of materials not observed. The recommendations presented herein are specific to the development plans reflected on the current grading plan. Modifications to that design or development plans could necessitate revisions to these recommendations . PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Current plans call for the demolition of the existing development and constructing 35 residential structures comprised of two story duplexes (units 15-35) along the northerly portion of the project with a "Podium" structure along the south side of the site. The "Podium" structure will consist of a parking garage on the first floor and two story condominiums (units 1-14) placed above the parking garage. It is anticipated that the "Podium" portion will be supported by conventional continuous and spread footings. The remaining two story duplex condominium structures will be supported by post-tensioned foundation systems. Two driveways on the east and west side of the site from Ocean Street will be constructed to allow for access to the parking garage. The driveway along the west side will also allow access to the northwesterly side of the site for handicapped parking adjacent to Unit 19 and for emergency fire access along the northern edge of the project. Portions of the northern and easterly property lines will be supported by a five to six foot high Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) retaining wall. Several other conventional retaining walls will be constructed for the parking garage/podium to heights on the order of 10 to 12 feet, along with other smaller conventional retaining walls along Ocean Street frontage and in the interior of the site . 3.0 SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION Geocon Inc. (Gl 2004) conducted a subsurface investigation to determine the engineering properties of the onsite soils, liquefaction potential, and to evaluate the onsite soils for support of the development proposed at that time. As part of their study Geocon (GI 2004) excavated logged and sampled ten Hollow Stem auger borings and conducted laboratory testing of both bulk and "undisturbed" samples of the onsite soils (see appendix C) This current study by AGS was aimed at providing more detailed geotechnical information as it relates to: 1) existing site soil conditions; 2) discussion of the geologic units onsite; 3) seismic hazard analysis; 4) engineering characteristics of the onsite soils; 5) seismic design parameters for use in the structural design of the proposed condominium project; 6) liquefaction and dynamic settlement remediation measures; and 7) foundation design parameters for the proposed conventional shallow foundation system. As part of this study AGS retained Kehoe Testing & Engineering to advance three Cone Penetrometer Soundings (CPT -1 thru CPT-3 (see appendix B)). As part of our work AGS prepared a composite plan utilizing the 20-scale Precise Grading plans prepared by RBF and Associates and the existing topography (Plate 1 ). Data developed from ADVANCED GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC. I • • • • • • • ;. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • March 19,2013 P/W 1205-06 Page3 Report No. 1205-06-B-3 the previous study is included herein and has been used to develop the conclusions and recommendations presented in this document . 4.0 4.1 4.2 ENGINEERING GEOLOGY Regional Geologic and Geomorphic Setting The project site is situated in the Peninsular Ranges Geomorphic province. The Peninsular Ranges Province is dominated by a series of northwest-oriented mountain ranges extending from the Baja California peninsula north to the Transverse Ranges. The series of mountain ranges are separated by northwest trending valleys; sub parallel to faults branching from the San Andreas Fault System. The Peninsular Ranges province is bounded by the Transverse Ranges Province to the north, the Colorado Desert Province to the east, Mexico to the south, and Pacific Ocean to the west Included within the province are the offshore islands of Santa Catalina, San Clemente, San Nicolas, and Santa Barbara. Major mountain ranges within the province include the San Jacinto, Santa Ana, Santa Rosa, Agua Tibia, and Laguna Mountains. The highest elevation is found at San Jacinto Peak (10,805-feet) in the San Jacinto Mountains. Summit elevations generally decrease to the west. Slopes in the western portion of the province are gentler, similar to the Sierra Nevada. Drainage is generally provided by the San Diego, San Dieguito, San Luis Rey, Santa Margarita, Santa Ana, and San Jacinto Rivers. The project site is more specifically situated in the coastal section of the Peninsular Ranges Geomorphic Province. The coastal section is underlain by a thick sequence of sedimentary rocks that unconformably overlie basement rocks. The portion of the coastal province in which the site is located is predominantly underlain by Tertiary-aged marine and non-marine sediments consisting of interbedded sandstone, siltstone, claystone and conglomerate. Following deposition of the Cretaceous-aged units of the Rosario Group, the coastal margin underwent uplift and erosion until the middle Eocene. Subsequent deposition on the coastal margin occurred during several transgressive and regressive cycles resulting in a series of partially intertonguing sedimentary sequences ranging from non-marine fan and dune deposits in the east to marine continental shelf deposits near the present day coastline (Kennedy and Tan, 2008). Beginning in the early Quaternary Period, the sea began the first of many landward incursions onto the coastal shelf resulting in the formation of a sequence of marine terraces descending to present sea-leveL Marine and non-marine sediments were subsequently deposited unconformably on these wave-cut terraces and have been preserved due to regional uplift. Faulting and deformation of the coastal province began in late Miocene or Pliocene time and continues to the present along several offshore and onshore faults . Subsurface Conditions A brief description of the earth materials encountered during the previous investigation by GI and AGS's recent investigation is presented in the following sections. More detailed descriptions of the materials encountered during this investigation are provided in the boring logs and CPT soundings included in Appendices B and C. Based on our review of subsurface excavations, geologic maps and ADVANCED GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC. ,,., . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • March 19,2013 P/W 1205-06 Page4 Report No. 1205-06-B-3 literature, the site is underlain to the maximum depths explored by old paralic deposits (Units 6-7) . The old paralic deposits are subsequently overlain by undocumented engineered fill and alluvial soils of variable thickness. It is assumed this undocumented fill was placed during the original mass grading of the site sometime between 1953 and 1980. Records documenting this grading were unavailable for our review during the preparation of this report. 4.3 Geologic Units The proposed project is underlain by previously placed undocumented fills (afu), alluvium and old paralic deposits (Units 6-7). The approximate distribution of the geologic units is shown on Plate I . The following is a brief summary of the current as-graded configuration . 4.3.1 Undocumented Artificial Fill/ Alluvium Undifferentiated (Map Symbol afu/Qal) Undocumented artificial fill associated with the initial grading of the property is present across most of the site, as shown on Plate 1. The fill consists of clayey to silty sands, sands that are slightly moist to saturated, loose to dense. The undocumented fill overlies the old paralic deposits and is found to range in depth from a few feetto in excess of 13.5 feet . Alluvium is present below the undocumented fill. A clear distinction between the undocumented fill and the alluvium was not differentiated by GI in their study and is difficult to determine with CPT soundings. Accordingly, AGS has grouped these deposits together. In general, the alluvium is limited to the lower areas adjacent to the lagoon based upon our review of available air photos of the site. The deeper portions of the saturated alluvium on the northern side of the project range from sands, silty sands to sandy silts and clays. In general, these deeper deposits are poorly consolidated and are susceptible to seismically induced liquefaction and dynamic settlement . 4.3.2. Old Paralic Deposits (Qop (6-7)) The site is underlain by two distinct subunits within the old paralic deposits; a coarse grained sub unit characterized by dense to medium dense silty sands to sands and a fine grained sub units characterized by medium firm to hard sandy silts and clays. In general, this old paralic deposits are relatively flat lying and do not exhibit slope instability . 4.4 Groundwater Groundwater was encountered in the GI Borings B-5 through B-8, and B-1 0 at elevations approximately one foot above sea level. CPT-I through CPT-3 also encountered groundwater at elevations of approximately 2.0 to 1.0 MSL. Seepage was not observed in the GI borings at the coarse grained /fme grained contact in the old paralic deposits . 4.5 Faulting and Seismicity The site is located in the tectonically active Southern California area, and will therefore likely experience shaking effects from earthquakes. The type and severity of seismic hazards affecting the site are to a large degree dependent upon the distance to the causative fault, the intensity of the seismic event, and the underlying soil characteristics. The seismic hazard may be primary, such as surface rupture and/or ground shaking, or secondary, such as liquefaction or dynamic settlement. The following is a site-specific discussion of ground motion parameters, earthquake-induced ADVANCED GEOTECHNICAL SOLUllONS, INC • March 19,2013 P/W 1205-06 Page 5 Report No. 1205-06-B-3 landslide hazards, settlement, and liquefaction. The purpose of this analysis is to identifY potential seismic hazards and propose mitigations, if necessary, to reduce the hazard to an acceptable level of risk. The following seismic hazards discussion is guided by the California Building Code (20 1 0), CDMG (2008), and Martin and Lew (1998). 4.5.1 Surface Fault Rupture No known active faults have been mapped at or near the subject site. The nearest known active surface fault is the Oceanside section of the Newport-Inglewood-Rose Canyon fault zone which is approximately 4.3 miles west of the subject site. Accordingly, the potential for fault surface rupture on the subject site is considered to be low to remote. This conclusion is based on literature review and aerial photograph analysis. 4.5.2 Seismicity As noted, the site is within the tectonically active southern California area, and is approximately 4.3 miles from an active fault, the Oceanside section of the Newport-Inglewood-Rose Canyon fault zone. The potential exists for strong ground motion that may affect future improvements. At this point in time, non-critical structures (commercial, residential, and industrial) are usually designed according to the California Building Code (2010) and that of the controlling local agency. However, liquefaction/seismic slope stability analyses, critical structures, water tanks and unusual structural designs will likely require site specific ground motion input. 4.5.3 Liquefaction Potentially liquefiable soils were encountered in CPT 1, CPT-2, CPT-3, and GI borings B-7, B-8, and B-10. In general the potentially liquefiable soils range from a few feet to approximately to four feet thick and consist of zones of poorly consolidated sands and silty sands below the existing water table. Based upon our liquefaction analysis there is a potential for liquefaction of these poorly consolidated soils in their present condition. The primary concern associated with liquefiable soils onsite are large magnitudes of dynamic settlement and the potential for surface manifestation of liquefaction (loss of bearing, sand boils, and ground cracking). 4.5.4 Dynamic Settlement Dynamic settlement occurs in response to an earthquake event in loose sandy earth materials. The potential of dynamic settlement at the subject site is considered moderate to high. The magnitude of dynamic settlement is on the order of approximately 3 to 4 inches. 4.5.5 Seismically Induced Landsliding No geomorphic features indicative of landsliding were observed onsite by AGS or GI. Further, given the relatively flat lying interbeded Old Paralic deposits the potential for Jandsliding is considered to be very low. ADVANCED GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC. ,.: ~r 0 • • • • • • ,. • • • • ! ,. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • March 19,2013 P/W 1205-06 Page 6 Report No. 1205-06-B-3 5.0 5.1 4.5.6. Other Seismic Hazards The potential for the site to be adversely impacted by tsunamis and/or seiches is considered to be moderate at the site given its minimum design elevation of 17 feet MSL and the close proximity to the Pacific Ocean . ENGINEERING ANALYSIS Presented herein is a general discussion of the geotechnical properties of the various soil types and earth materials summarized from our site-specific analyses of the project and the referenced reports . Material Properties 5.1.1 Excavation Characteristics Based on our analysis, it is this firm's opinion that existing undocumented fills, partiaJiy saturated alluvium, and old paralic deposits will be excavatable with conventional excavation techniques assisted by minor to moderate ripping . 5.1.2 Compressibility Onsite materials that are significantly compressible include undocumented fill, alluvium and highly weathered old paralic deposits. These materials will require complete removal prior to placement of fill, and where exposed at design grade. In the northern portion of the site complete removals are unlikely given the shallow depth of the groundwater and the thickness of these deposits. In these areas it is suggested that mitigation should be conducted to minimize the potential of dynamic settlement. 5.1.3 Expansion Potential It is anticipated that the expansion potential of the onsite materials will vary from "Low" to "Very High." The majority of these materials can be classified as having a "Low" to "Medium" expansion potential. However, the fine-grained sub unit within the old paralic deposits contains clay soils having "high" to "very high" expansion potential. 5.1.4 Shear Strength Characteristics Table 5.1 below presents a summary of"averaged" shear strength parameters obtained from the data presented in the referenced reports. These values have been utilized in our slope stability analyses and can be used for design of Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) segmental retaining walls. For the design ofMSE walls the designer should utilize the values for Compacted Fill-Select for the soil used in the "reinforced" zone and should use the values for Compacted Fill-Non Select in the ''foundation" and "retained" wall zones . 4DV4NCED GEOTECHNICI\L SOLUTIONS, INC • • • • • • • • I • • ,. I • • • • • • • • • • • • 'e • ,. ! • l • • • • • • March 19,2013 P/W 1205-06 Page7 Report No. 1205-06-B-3 5.2 TABLE5.1 Shear Strength Characteristics Material Description Cohesion, Friction Angle Unit Weight C(psj) ¢(Degrees) y(pcj) Compacted Fill-Select 100 32 125 (afcs) Old Paralic 200 35 125 (Coarse Grained sub unit) Old Paralic 450 26 120 (Fine Grained sub unit) 5.1.5 Earthwork Adjustments The following average earthwork adjustment factors presented in table 5.2 have been formulated for this report . TABLE5.2 Earthwork Adjustments Geologic Unit Adjustment Factor Undocumented Fill & AUuvium Shrink 10% to 12% Old Paralic Deposits (Qop): Bulk3%to 5% These values may be used in an effort to balance the earthwork quantities. As is the case with every project, contingencies should be made to adjust the earthwork balance when grading is in progress and actual conditions are better defmed . 5.1.6 Chemical/Resistivity Analyses The results of sulfate testing (conducted by others) indicate that the soil exhibits "negligible" sulfate concentrations when classified in accordance with ACI318-05 Table 4.3.1 (per 2007 CBC). Slope Stabili!Y Slope stability analysis was not conducted as no slopes higher that 3 to 5 feet will remain onsite once the proposed structures and retaining walls are constructed. From a geotechnical perspective fill slopes graded at slope ratios of 2:1 (horizontal to vertical) comprised of compacted fill are both grossly and surficially stable . ADVANCED GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC . ;¥:;:;·"-' • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • March 19, 2013 PIW 1205-06 5.3 Bearing Capacity and Lateral Earth Pressures Page 8 Report No. 1205-06-B-3 Ultimate bearing capacity values were obtained using the graphs and formula presented in NA VF AC DM-7.1. Allowable bearing was determined by applying a factor of safety of at least 3 to the ultimate bearing capacity. Static lateral earth pressures were calculated using Rankine methods for active and passive cases. If it is desired to use Coulomb forces, a separate analysis specific to the application, can be conducted . 6.0 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING Development of the subject property as proposed is considered feasible, from a geotechnical standpoint, provided that the conclusions and recommendations presented herein are incorporated into the design and construction of the project. Presented below are specific issues identified by this study or previous studies as possibly impacting site development. Recommendations to mitigate these issues are presented in the text of this report, with graphic presentation of the recommendations on the enclosed plans, where appropriate . 6.1 Site Preparation and Removals Grading should be accomplished under the observation and testing of the project soils engineer and engineering geologist or their authorized representative in accordance with the recommendations contained herein, the current grading ordinance of the City of Carlsbad, and AGS's Earthwork Specifications (Appendix D). Topsoil, weathered bedrock and undocumented fill should be removed in areas planned to receive fill or where exposed at final grade. The resulting undercuts should be replaced with engineered fill. The extent of removals can best be determined in the field during grading when observation and evaluation can be performed by the soil engineer and/or engineering geologist. Removals should expose competent bedrock and be observed and mapped by the engineering geologist prior to fill placement. In general, soils removed during remedial grading will be suitable for reuse in compacted fills, provided they are properly moisture conditioned and do not contain deleterious materials . 6.1.1 Stripping and Deleterious Material Removal Existing vegetation, trash, debris, and other deleterious materials should be removed and wasted from the site prior to removal of unsuitable soils and placement of compacted fill. Concrete debris generated from the demolition of the existing improvements can be integrated into the deeper fills provided it is reduced to a maximum size of 8-inches and has no protruding reinforcement . 6.1.2 Undocumented Fill/Alluvium Undifferentiated (Map Symbol afu/Qal) Undocumented fill and alluvium will require complete removal and recompaction to project specifications. Estimated depths of removal range from two to 15 feet. Locally deeper areas may be encountered . 6.1.3 Topsoil (No Map Symbol) Topsoil will require complete removal and recompaction to project specification in shallow cuts and fill areas. Estimated removal depth for the topsoil is one to three feet. ADVANCED GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • March 19, 2013 P/W 1205-06 Page9 Report No. 1205-06-B-3 6.2 6.3 6.1.4 Old Paralic Deposits (Map Symbol Qop (~7)) The old paralic deposits exhibit a weathered profile. The weathered profile is approximately one- half foot to three feet thick. These upper weathered portions of the units will require removal prior to fi11 placement in structural fil1 areas and where exposed at design grade . Liquefaction Mitigation In consideration of our recent CPT soundings, AGS conducted a liquefaction analysis in the lower, northern portion of the site assuming that groundwater would be at an elevation of approximately 2.0 feet MSL. AGS utilized a fill depth of approximately four to five feet above existing grade to achieve design grade for the proposed buildings and a site acceleration of 0.4g. Our analysis of the CPT data indicates that liquefaction could occur in various layers of the soils below the groundwater table. In general, the potentially liquefiable layers ranged from a few inches thick to as thick as four feet. Theoretical dynamic settlement of the potentially liquefiable insitu soils could be on the order of 3 to 4 inches. Due to the dense nature of the old paralic deposits these soils are not subject to liquefaction To meet the requirements of CDMG Special Publication 117 and the current standard of care, it is recommended that a maximum theoretical settlement used for structural design of the proposed condominiums in the northern portion of the site (Units 15 -35) should be 1.0 inch with a maximum theoretical differential settlement of Y2 inch in 40 feet. To minimize the adverse effects of liquefaction induced settlement and surface manifestation for Units 15-35 AGS recommends that the in-place saturated undocumented fill/alluvium should undergo in-situ modifications with the construction of stone columns and all the foundations for the residential structures should utilize a Post-Tensioned foundations system. It is AGS's opinion that once the proposed soil improvement (stone columns) are constructed; recompaction of the upper soils is conducted; the placement of the proposed design fill to achieve design grade; and the use of a suitably designed post tensioned foundation is utilized the effects of seismically-induced dynamic settlement will be mitigated to "acceptable level of risk" as defmed by CDMG Special Publication 117 . It is AGS's recommendation that the number, location and depth of soil improvement should be determined by the specialty contractor. The design should be such that the magnitude of dynamic settlement does not exceed one inch with differential settlement Y2 inch in 40 feet. Unsuitable Soil Removal Adjacent to Property Lines As depicted on the grading plans (Plate I) and cross sections A-A' through F-F' (Plates 2 through 4), settlement-sensitive improvements (retaining walls and MSE WaJJs) are proposed to be as close as one to two feet from the property line. For aU settlement-sensitive structures (where feasible) complete removal of unsuitable soils should be conducted below and extending on a 1 : 1 (horizontal to vertical) downward projection to bedrock. In lieu of conducting these removals and/or shoring, specialized trench type removals (utilizing backboe/trackhoes) along the property line can be conducted and specialized subgrade treatment can be used for the MSE walls which are proposed in these areas . ADVANCED GEOTECHNICAL SOLUHONS, INC • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• i • • • • • March 19,2013 P/W 1205-06 Page 10 Report No. 1205-06-B-3 6.4 Temporary Backcut Stability 6.5 6.6 During grading operations, temporary backcuts may be required to accomplish remedial grading . Backcuts in undocumented fill, topsoil, and bedrock areas should be made no steeper than 1: 1. In consideration of the inherent instability created by temporary construction backcuts, it is imperative that grading schedules are coordinated to minimize the unsupported exposure time of these excavations. Once started, these excavations and subsequent fill operations should be maintained to completion without intervening delays imposed by avoidable circumstances. In cases where five-day workweeks comprise a normal schedule, grading should be planned to avoid exposing at-grade or near-grade excavations through a non-work weekend. Where improvements may be affected by temporary instability, either on or offsite, further restrictions such as slot cutting, extending work days, implementing weekend schedules, and/or other requirements considered critical to serving specific circumstances may be imposed . MSEWaUs Unwanted horizontal and vertical movement of settlement sensitive structures could occur in areas situated over the tails of the MSE walls along the northern property lines. To minimize this settlement potential, placement of additional geotextile fabric is recommended to soften the transition zone of the "reinforced" and "retained" soil zones. This additional geotextile should consist of a layer Mirafi 600X (or equivalent) placed a minimum of five feet on either side of the end of the geotextile MSE wall reinforcement. This additional geotextile layer should be separated from the MSE wall reinforcement by approximately six to twelve inches of compacted fill and should be approximately two feet below finished grade Geotextile reinforcement is also recommended below all of the MSE walls where complete removal of settlement sensitive soils are not conducted within a 1: I projection of the walls. The proposed Geotextile should be placed approximately 12 inches below the first course of block and should extend horizontaUy approximately eight feet from the fore cut, back underneath the "reinforced" soil portion of the MSE wall. The Geotextile reinforcement should consist of Mirafi 600X (or equivalent) . Overexcavation Recommendations The following general overexcavation recommendations are presented . 6.6.1 Cut/Fill Transitions Where design grades and/or remedial grading activities create a cut/fill transition, the cut and shallow fi1l portions of the building pad shall be overexcavated a minimum depth offtve feet (or a minimum of three feet below retaining wall foundation elements, whichever is greater) or H/3 not to exceed twelve feet (where H is the maximum depth of fill on the lot), whichever is greater and replaced to design grade with compacted fill. In lieu of the aforementioned h/3 criteria, increased compaction (minimum of 95%) below a depth of five feet can be utilized. All undercuts should be graded such that a gradient of at least one percent is maintained toward deeper fill areas or the front of the lot. Replacement fill should be eight-inch minus in maximum particle size, possess "Low" expansion potential and be compacted to project specifications as discussed in Section 6.9 . ADVANCED GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • March 19,2013 P/W 1205-06 Page II ReportNo. 1205-06-B-3 6.7 6.8 6.9 6.6.2 Podium Area Due to the potentially highly expansive nature of the claystone portions of the old paralic deposits likely to be encountered in the podium footprint, it is recommended that these materials should be overexcavated approximately five feet and replaced with a select "low" expansive soil. This undercut should have a minimum one percent gradient toward the northern portion of the building to allow for potential subsurface drainage . 6.6.3 Expansive Soils Soils with expansion potential of "Medium" or greater should be placed a minimum of five feet below design grade. Subsurface Drainage 6.7.1 Canyon Snbdrains Owing to the lack of defined drainages, canyon subdrains are not recommended . 6. 7.2 Heel Drains For MSE walls a heel drain should be constructed at the interface between the "retained" and "reinforced" zones. Heel drains should be constructed in accordance with the detail for Buttress/Stabilization Drain shown on Detai12 (Appendix D). Construction Staking and Survey Removal bottoms, keyways, subdrains and backdrains should be surveyed by the civil engineer after approval by the geotechnical engineer/engineering geologist and prior to the placement of fill. Toe stakes should be provided by the civil engineer in order to verify required key dimensions and locations . Earthwork Considerations 6.9.1 Compaction Standards Fill and processed natural ground shall be compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent as determined by ASTM Test Method: D 1557. Care should be taken that the ultimate grade be considered when determining the compaction requirements for disposal fill areas. Compaction shall be achieved at slightly above the optimum moisture content, and as generally discussed in the attached Earthwork Specifications (Appendix D) . 6.9.2 Documentation of Removals and Drains Removal bottoms, canyon subdrains, fill keys, backcuts, backdrains and their outlets should be observed and approved by the engineering geologist and/or geotechnical engineer and documented by the civil engineer prior to fill placement. 6.9.3 Treatment of Removal Bottoms At the completion of removals, the exposed bottom should be scarified to a practical depth, moisture conditioned to above optimum conditions, and compacted in-place to the standards set forth in this report . ADVANCED GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • March 19,2013 P/W 1205-06 6.9.4 Fill Placement Page 12 Report No. 1205-06-B-3 After removals, scarification, and compaction of in-place materials are completed, additional fill may be placed. Fill should be placed in thin lifts [eight-(8) inch bulk], moisture conditioned to slightly above the optimum moisture content, mixed, compacted, and tested as grading progresses until final grades are attained . 6.9.5 Benching Where the natural slope is steeper than 5-horizontal to 1-vertical, and where designed by the project geotechnical engineer or geologist, compacted fill material should be keyed and benched into competent bedrock or firm natural soil. 6.9.6 Mixing In order to provide thorough moisture conditioning and proper compaction, processing (mixing) of materials is necessary. Mixing should be accomplished prior to, and as part of the compaction of each fill lift . 6.9. 7 Fill Slope Construction Fill slopes shall be overfilled to an extent determined by the contractor, but not less than two (2) feet measured perpendicular to the slope face, so that when trimmed back to the compacted core, the required compaction is achieved. Compaction of each fill lift should extend out to the temporary slope face. Backrolling during mass filling as intervals not exceeding four (4) feet in height is recommended unless more extensive overfill is undertaken. As an alternative to overfilling, fill slopes may be built to the finish slope face in accordance with the following recommendations: • Compaction of each fill lift shall extend to the face of the slopes . • Backrolling during mass grading shall be undertaken at intervals not exceeding four (4) feet in height. Backrolling at more frequent intervals may be required . • Care should be taken to avoid spillage of loose materials down the face of the slopes during grading. • At completion of mass filling, the slope surface shall be watered, shaped and compacted first with a sheepsfoot roller, and then track walked with a bulldozer, such that compaction to project standards is achieved to the slope face. Proper seeding and planting of the slopes should follow as soon as practical, to inhibit erosion and deterioration of the slope surfaces. Proper moisture control will enhance the long-term stability of the finished slope surface . 6.10 Haul Roads Haul roads, ramp fills, and tailing areas should be removed prior to placement of fill . ADVANCED GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC • """'"-----~ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 • • • • • • • • • March 19,2013 P/W 1205-06 Page 13 Report No. 1205-06-B-3 6. I 1 Import Materials 7.0 Dependent upon the materials encountered during the mass grading it may be necessary to import "select" granular "low to very low'' expansive soils for use in the construction of the MSE walls. Import materials, if required, should have similar engineering characteristics as the onsite soils and should be approved by the soil engineer at the source prior to importation to the site . CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Construction of the proposed multi-family residential structures and associated improvements is considered feasible, from a geotechnical standpoint, provided that the conclusions and recommendations presented herein are incorporated into the design and construction of the project. Presented below are specific issues identified by this study as possibly affecting site development. Recommendations to mitigate these issues are presented in the text of this report . 7.1 DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS It is our understanding that the proposed foundation system for the "Podium" will consist of a conventionally reinforced foundation system supporting units 1-14, with the remaining two story residential structures, units 15-35, be supported by a post-tensioned slab-on-grade foundation systems. In addition to the structures, associated driveways, hardscape and landscape areas are proposed. From a geotechnical perspective these proposed improvements are feasible provided that the following recommendations are incorporated into the design and construction . 7.1.1 Foundation Design Criteria The multi-family residential structures can be supported by either post-tensioned or conventional shallow slab-on-grade foundation systems. Once the grading is conducted the expansion potential of the underlying soils is anticipated to range from "Low" to "Very Low" The following values may be used in the foundation design. Allowable Bearing: Lateral Bearing: Sliding Coefficient: 2500 lbs./sq.ft. 250 lbs./sq.ft. at a depth of 12 inches plus 250 lbsJsq.ft. for each additional foot of embedment and depth (respectively) to a maximum of3,500 psf. 0.35 The above values may be increased as allowed by Code to resist transient loads such as wind or seismic. Building Code and structural design considerations may govern. Depth and reinforcement requirements should be evaluated by the Structural Engineer . 7.1.2 Conventional Foundation Design Recommendations-Podium {Units 1-14) Based upon the onsite soil conditions and information supplied by the CBC-201 0, conventional foundation systems should be designed in accordance with Section 7 .l.l and the following recommendations . ADVANCED GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • March 19,2013 PIW 1205-06 Continuous Footings- Depth-Minimum of24 inches Width-Minimum of 18 inches Page 14 Report No. 1205-06-B-3 Reinforcement-Minimum four No.5 rebar's, two top and two bottom Isolated Spread Footings-Minimum of 24 inches wide and 24 inches deep (Reinforcement per structural engineer) Garage Slab-Minimum of 5 inches thick with # 3 rebar on 15 inch centers both ways. Consideration should be given to underlay the garage slab with a moisture barrier. Garage Slab Entrance-A grade beam reinforced continuously with the garage footings shall be constructed across the garage entrances, tying together the ends of the perimeter footings and between individual spread footings. This grade beam should be embedded a minimum of 18 inches. A thickened slab, separated by a cold joint from the garage beam, should be provided at the garage entrance. Minimum dimensions of the thickened edge shall be six (6) inches deep. Footing depth, width and reinforcement should be the same as the structure. Slab thickness, reinforcement and under-slab treatment should be the same as the structure . 7.1.3 Post-Tensioned foundation Design Parameters (Units 15-35) The following post-tensioned design parameters are presented in Table 7.1 for building units 15-35 . TABLE 7.1 Post Tensioned Design Parameters Center Lift Edge Lift Em(ft) Ym (ft) Em (ft) Ym(ft) 7.5 0.51 3.9 1.26 7.1.4 Seismic Design Parameters The following seismic design parameters presented in Table 7.2 are intended to be code compliant to the California Building Code (2010). The subject lots have been identified to be site class "D" in accordance with CBC, 2010, Table 1613.5.3 (1). The lots are located at 33.1653"N Latitude and- 117.3568°W Longitude. Utilizing this information, the computer program USGS Earthquake Ground Motion Parameters Version 5.1.0 and ASCE 7 criterion, the seismic design category for 0.20 seconds (Ss) and 1.0 second (S 1) period response accelerations can be determined (CBC, 2010 1613.5.5.1) along with the design spectral response acceleration (CBC, 2010 1613.5.4) . ADVANCm GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • March 19,2013 P/W 1205-06 Table 7.2 Seismic Design Criteria Mapped Spectral Acceleration (0.2 sec Period), Ss Mapped Spectral Acceleration (1.0 sec Period), S1 Site Coefficient, Fa Site Coefficient, F v MCE Spectral Response Acceleration (0.2 sec Period), SMs MCE Spectral Response Acceleration (1.0 sec Period), SM1 Design Spectral Response Acceleration (0.2 sec Period), SDs Design Spectral Response Acceleration (1.0 sec Period), SD1 7.1.5 Settlement Potential Page 15 Report No. 1205-06-B-3 1.059g 0.40lg 1.077 1.599 l.140g 0.642g 0.760g 0.428g Based upon the subsurface exploration and laboratory testing, and proposed ground modifications the subject residential structures and associated improvements may be subject to potential fill settlement. The magnitude of potential is anticipated to be: Total Settlement-1 inch Differential-1/2 inch in 40 feet 7.1.6 Under Slab-Units 15-35 Prior to concrete placement the subgrade soils should be moisture conditioned to optimum moisture content or slightly above . A moisture and vapor retarding system should be placed below the slabs-on-grade in portions of the structure considered to be moisture sensitive. The retarder should be of suitable composition, thickness, strength and low permeance to effectively prevent the migration of water and reduce the transmission of water vapor to acceptable levels. Historically, a 10-mil plastic membrane, such as Visqueen, placed between one to four inches of clean sand, has been used for this purpose. More recently Stego® Wrap or similar underlayments have been used to lower permeance to effectively prevent the migration of water and reduce the transmission of water vapor to acceptable levels. The use of this system or other systems, materials or techniques can be considered, at the discretion of the designer, provided the system reduces the vapor transmission rates to acceptable levels . 7.1.7 Deepened Footings and Structural Setbacks It is generally recognized that improvements constructed in proximity to natural slopes or properly constructed, manufactured slopes can, over a period of time, be affected by natural processes including gravity forces, weathering of surficial soils and long-term (secondary) settlement. Most ADVANCED GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • March 19,2013 P/W 1205-06 Page 16 Report No. 1205-06-B-3 building codes, including the California Building Code (CBC), require that structures be set back or footings deepened, where subject to the influence of these natural processes . For the subject site, where foundations for residential structures are to exist in proximity to slopes, the footings should be embedded to satisfy the requirements presented in Figure 1 . FIGURE 1 7 .1.8 Concrete Design H/3 BUT NEED NOT EXCEED 40 FT. MAX. H t The results of sulfate testing (conducted by others) indicate that the soil exhibits "low" sulfate concentrations when classified in accordance with ACI 318-05 Table 4.3.1 (per 2010 CBC) . Resistivity and chloride testing indicates that onsite soils are "moderately" corrosive to metals. In the past on similar projects, corrosion protection typically consisted of non-metallic piping for water lines to and below the slabs or by installing above slab plumbing. Consultation with a corrosion engineer is recommended. Corrosion 7.1.9 Conventional Retaining Walls The following earth pressures are recommended for the design of conventional retaining walls onsite backfilled with select granular fill: Static Case Rankine Level Backfill Coefficients Coefficient of Active Pressure: K2 = 0.28 Coefficient of Passive Pressure: Kp = 3.54 Coefficient of at Rest Pressure: Ko = 0.47 Equivalent Fluid Pressure (psf/lin.ft.) 35 442 55 ADVANCED GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • March 19,2013 PIW 1205-06 Rankine 2 : 1 Backfill Coefficients Coefficient of Active Pressure: Ka = 0.42 Coefficient of Passive Pressure: Descending Kp (-) = 1.34 Coefficient of At Rest Pressure: Ko 0.65 Seismic Case Page 17 Report No. 1205-06-B-3 Equivalent Fluid Pressure (psf/lin.ft.) 52 167 81 In addition to the above static pressures, unrestrained retaining walls should be designed to resist seismic loading. In order to be considered unrestrained, retaining walls should be allowed to rotate a minimum of roughly 0.004 times the wall height. The seismic load can be modeled as a thrust load applied at a point 0.6H above the base of the wall, where H is equal to the height of the wall. This seismic load (in pounds per lineal foot ofwall) is represented by the following equation: Where: H =Height of the wall (feet) 'Y = soil density = 125 pounds per cubic foot (pet) kt. =seismic pseudostatic coefficient= 0.4* peak horizontal ground acceleration I g Walls should be designed to resist the combined effects of static pressures and the above seismic thrust load . The foundations for retaining walls of appurtenant structures structurally separated from the building structures, may bear on properly compacted fill. A bearing value of 2,000 psf may be used for design of retaining walls. Retaining wall footings should be designed to resist the lateral forces by passive soil resistance and/or base friction as recommended for foundation lateral resistance. To relieve the potential for hydrostatic pressure wall backfill should consist of a free draining backfill (sand equivalent "SE" >20) and a heel drain should be constructed. The heel drain should be place at the heel of the wall and should consist of a 4-inch diameter perforated pipe (SDR35 or SCHD 40) surrounded by 4 cubic feet of crushed rock (3/4-inch) per lineal foot, wrapped in filter fabric (Mirafi® 140N or equivalent) . Proper drainage devices should be installed along the top of the wall backfil1, which should be properly sloped to prevent surface water ponding adjacent to the wall. In addition to the wall drainage system, for building perimeter walls extending below the finished grade, the wall should be waterproofed and/or damp-proofed to effectively seal the wall from moisture infiltration through the wall section to the interior wall face . The wall should be backft1led with granular soils placed in loose lifts no greater than 8-inches thick, at or near optimum moisture content, and mechanically compacted to a minimum 90 percent relative compaction as determined by ASTM Test Method 01557. Flooding or jetting of backfill materials generally do not result in the required degree and uniformity of compaction and, therefore, is not recommended. The soils engineer or his representative should observe the retaining wall footings, 4DVANCED GEOTECHNIC4L SOLUTIONS, INC • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • March 19,2013 P/W 1205~06 Page 18 Report No. 1205-06-B-3 7.2 7.3 backdrain installation and be present during placement of the wall backfill to confirm that the walls are properly backfilled and compacted . 1 H WATERPROOfiNG MEMBRANE (OPTIONAL) ry N~IVE BACKFILL (E1<50) :: / ~ '" ~o'l ~ RAnER ~ (!) ~4-!NCHf'li.RFOW.lEOASSORPVCI'PEOl~AI'PRQll1;oDtoui""'-ENl SUI:I$!lT\JHi f'I.ACbU PERR:>AA!lONS OOWNANO SORfi()UNI)EO 9V A MINiMUM OF 1 CUBIC ~EEl OF .WINCH ROCK OR API'RO\IhiJ EOIJIVM.CNI SUBSt (fUtCANUW:AAr'PE:O IN MIHAH 1401-jLfl:.K ~~IC OftAPPROVi::O l:OUIVAL.bNT SU8Sn1UT~ UTILITY TRENCH EXCAVATION All utility trenches should be shored or laid back in accordance with applicable OSHA standards. Excavations in bedrock areas should be made in consideration of underlying geologic structure . AGS should be consulted on these issues during construction . UTILITY TRENCH BACKFILL Mainline and lateral utility trench backfill should be compacted to at least 90 percent of maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D 1557. Onsite soils will not be suitable for use as bedding material but will be suitable for use in backfill, provided oversized materials are removed. No surcharge loads should be imposed above excavations. This includes spoil piles, lumber, concrete trucks or other construction materials and equipment. Drainage above excavations should be directed away from the banks. Care should be taken to avoid saturation of the soils. Compaction should be accomplished by mechanical means. Jetting of native soils will not be acceptable . ADVANCED GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • March 19,2013 P/W 1205-06 Page 19 Report No. 1205-06-B-3 7.4 EXTERIOR SLABS, WALKWAYS AND PAVEMENT 7.4.1 Subgrade Compaction The subgrade below exterior slabs, sidewalks, driveways, patios, etc. should be compacted to a minimum of90 percent relative compaction as determined by ASTM D 1557 . 7.4.2 Subgrade Moisture The subgrade below exterior slabs, sidewalks, driveways, patios, etc. should be moisture conditioned to a minimum of 11 Opercent of optimum moisture content prior to concrete placement, dependent upon the expansion potential of the subgrade soils . 7 .4.3 Slab Thickness Concrete flatwork and driveways should be designed utilizing four-inch minimum thickness . 7.4.4 Control Joints Weakened plane joints should be installed on walkways at intervals of approximately eight to ten feet. Exterior slabs should be designed to withstand shrinkage of the concrete . 7.4.5 Flatwork Reinforcement Consideration should be given to reinforcing any exterior flatwork with 6 inch by 6 inch No.6 by No. 6 welded wire mesh for . 7 .4.6 Thickened Edge Consideration should be given to construct a thickened edge (scoop footing) at the perimeter of slabs and walkways adjacent to landscape areas to minimize moisture variation below these improvements. The thickened edge (scoop footing) should extend approximately eight inches below concrete slabs and should be a minimum of six inches wide. 7.4.7 Pavement Design The following preliminary recommendations are presented for onsite pavements assuming an R- Value (R) of 65: Concrete Pavement 6-inches Concrete* Over 4-Class II Base** *Minimum flexural strength of concrete MR=550psi **Subgrade and base compacted to a minimum of95% (per ASTM D 1557) Concrete Pavement 4-inches Asphaltic Concrete Over 6-Class II Base** **Subgrade and base compacted to a minimum of'95% (per ASTM D 1557) ADVANCED GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • March 19,2013 P/W 1205-06 Page20 Report No. 1205-06-B-3 7.5 7.6 8.0 PLAN REVIEW Once foundation design plans become available, they should be reviewed by AGS to verify that the design recommendations presented are consistent with the proposed construction . GEOTECHNICAL REVIEW As is the case in any grading project, multiple working hypotheses are established utilizing the available data, and the most probable model is used for the analysis. Information collected during the grading and construction operations is intended to evaluate the hypotheses, and some of the assumptions summarized herein may need to be changed as more information becomes available . Some modification of the grading and construction recommendations may become necessary, should the conditions encountered in the field differ significantly than those hypothesized to exist. AGS should review the pertinent plans and sections of the project specifications, to evaluate conformance with the intent of the recommendations contained in this report. If the project description or final design varies from that described in this report, AGS must be consulted regarding the applicability of, and the necessity for, any revisions to the recommendations presented herein. AGS accepts no liability for any use of its recommendations if the project description or final design varies and AGS is not consulted regarding the changes . SLOPE AND LOT MAINTENANCE Maintenance of improvements is essential to the long-term performance of structures and slopes. Although the design and construction during mass grading is planned to create slopes that are both grossly and surficially stable, certain factors are beyond the control of the soil engineer and geologist. The homeowners must implement certain maintenance procedures . The following recommendations should be implemented . 8.1 8.2 8.3 SLOPE PLANTING Slope planting should consist of ground cover, shrubs and trees that possess deep, dense root structures and require a minimum of irrigation. The resident should be advised of their responsibility to maintain such planting . LOT DRAINAGE Roof, pad and lot drainage should be collected and directed away from structures and slopes and toward approved disposal areas. Design fine-grade elevations should be maintained through the life of the structure or if design fine grade elevations are altered, adequate area drains should be installed in order to provide rapid discharge of water, away from structures and slopes. Residents should be made aware that they are responsible for maintenance and cleaning of all drainage terraces, down drains and other devices that have been installed to promote structure and slope stability . SLOPE IRRIGATION The resident, homeowner and Homeowner Association should be advised of their responsibility to maintain irrigation systems. Leaks should be repaired immediately. Sprinklers should be adjusted to provide maximum uniform coverage with a minimum of water usage and overlap . ADVANCED GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • March 19, 2013 PIW 1205-06 Page21 ReportNo. 1205-06-B-3 8.4 9.0 Overwatering with consequent wasteful run-off and ground saturation should be avoided. If automatic sprinkler systems are installed, their use must be adjusted to account for natural rainfall conditions . BURROWING ANIMALS Residents or homeowners should undertake a program for the elimination of burrowing animals . This should be an ongoing program in order to maintain slope stability . LIMITATIONS This report is based on the project as described and the information obtained from the excavations at the approximate locations indicated on the Plate 1. The findings are based on the results of the field, laboratol)', and office investigations combined with an interpolation and extrapolation of conditions between and beyond the excavation locations. The results reflect an interpretation of the direct evidence obtained . Services perfonned by AGS have been conducted in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing in the same locality under similar conditions. No other representation, either expressed or implied, and no warranty or guarantee is included or intended. The recommendations presented in this report are based on the assumption that an appropriate level of field review will be provided by geotechnical engineers and engineering geologists who are familiar with the design and site geologic conditions. That field review shall be sufficient to confirm that geotechnical and geologic conditions exposed during grading are consistent with the geologic representations and corresponding recommendations presented in this report. AGS should be notified of any pertinent changes in the project plans or if subsurface conditions are found to Val)' from those described herein. Such changes or variations may require a re-evaluation of the recommendations contained in this report . The data, opinions, and recommendations of this report are applicable to the specific design of this project as discussed in this report. They have no applicability to any other project or to any other location, and any and all subsequent users accept any and all liability resulting from any use or reuse of the data, opinions, and recommendations without the prior written consent of AGS . AGS has no responsibility for construction means, methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures, or for safety precautions or programs in connection with the construction, for the acts or omissions of the CONTRACTOR, or any other person performing any of the construction, or for the failure of any of them to carry out the construction in accordance with the final design drawings and specifications . ADVANCED GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC • • • • • • • • • • APPENDIX A • REFERNCES • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ADVANCED GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • I • I ,. I • • •• I • ! • • I • • • • • •• • • • REFERENCES California Division of Mines and Geology (CDMG 2008). Guidelines for Evaluating and Mitigating Seismic Hazards in California, 2008, Special Publication I 1 7 A. California Building Standards Commission. (2010). California Building Code . Advanced Geotechnical Solutions, Inc. (2010). Response to Cycle Review Comments Ocean Street Residences (CD 12-09), City of Carlsbad, California, PIW 1205-06, Report PIWI205-06-B-2, October 30, 2012 . Geocon Inc., Geotechnical Investigation, Ocean Street Condominiums, Ocean Street and Mountain View Drive, Carlsbad, California, dated September 3, 2004. (project no. 07353-22- 01) ADVANCED GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC . • • • • • APPENDIXB • CONE PENETROMETER SOUNDINGS • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ADVANCED GEOTECHNICAL SOLUnONS, INC • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • §: .s::. Q. Ql 0 X~ Kehoe Testing & Engineering T Office: (714) 901-7270 E Fax: (714) 901-7289 rich@kehoetesting.com www .kehoetesting.com Sleeve Stress 0 Tip Stress COR (tsf) 600 0 (tsf) 1 0 o~~r-~r-~--~--~---, 10 20 ..,..__--I 30~ J 40 50~--~ __ ._ __ ._ __ ._ __ ._~ Maximum depth: 52.78 (II) P-1 of2 1-f -I ~ J CPT Data Date: 05/Nov/2012 30 ton rig Test ID: CPT-3 Proiect: Carlsbad Customer: Advanced Geotechnical Solutions Job Site: Ocean Street Pore Pressure Ratio COR SBTFR -2 (tsf) 2 0 (%) 8 2 (Rob. 1986) 12 ~~~·~··0 I. ,,.,_._,-._~_,_..~-~.,-I 10 1-I I -i 1--I I-: ~ ~ 20 l I~ J l~ j l~ j -~lao 40 1 1 I I I I I I I I I !50 Tool D:Cf'T-3 F .. : ZDIN1203C.ECI' • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • g t • Q ~~ Ketme Teslilg & EJVneering t Office: (714) 901-7270 I Fax: (714) 901·7289 rlchQkahoetelting.com WMN .kehoetlltlna.com TlpBtNaaCOR SINYeScr-a 0 (tal) 800 0 (tsf) !Or---~~.---~--~--~~ eo 70 80 go 100~--~--~~~~--~--~ _.....,:11.78(11) ..... ZofZ 10 CPT Data 30 ton rig Pore Prwuure Ratio COR ·2 (taf) 2 0 (%) Date:~ovt.2012 TeatiD:CPT-3 ect: Carlsbad ns SBTFR 8 2 (Rob. 1INMI) 12 I I I I J t l I L YIII'IMGir ,_ ···~ 50 ISO 70 80 go 100 TloiD:CPT.a ..... -~ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • g ..c Q. Q) 0 K~ Kehoe Testing & Engineering T Office: (714) 901-7270 E Fax: (714) 901-7289 rich@kehoetesting.com www .kehoetestin_9.com Sleeve Stress 0 Tip Stress COR (tsf) 600 0 (tsf) 1 o 0~-.,.--'T""--,---.---....--. t '> j ~ j 30l~ J l/ J 40 50~---._-~-~-_. _ _._~ Mulmum depth: 31!.83 (II) CPT Data Date: 05/Nov/20 12 30 ton rig Test ID: CPT-2 Project: Carlsbad Customer: Advanced Geotechnical Solutions Job Site: Ocean Street ---------------------------- Pore Pressure Ratio COR SBTFR -2 (tsf) 2 0 (%) B 2 (Rob. 1986) 12 ~I I ::g I ::· I I I -~-----I 0 10 20 t IJ j li j t 3 j I l I 1 J l) J l { J -~ lao 40 ~~~~~~._---------~~ TootiD:CPT.a FII:ZOSN1202C.ECP ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• §: .&:; 0. il) c K~ Kehoe Testing & Engineering t Office: (714) 901-7270 ! Fax: (714) 901-7289 rich@kehoetesting.com www .kehoetesting.com Sleeve Stress Tip Stress COR (tsf) 600 0 (taf) 10 10 20rr j tt j 30 t-~ 1--f 40 50~--~~~~--~--~---J Maxirr>.Jm deplh: 28.17 (ft) CPT Data Date: 05/Nov/2012 30 ton rig Test ID: CPT-1 Proiect: Carlsbad Customer: Advanced Geotechnical Solutions Job Site: Ocean Street Pore Pressure Ratio COR SBTFR -2 (tsf) 2 0 (%) 8 2 (Rob. 1986) 12 ~, 1 1 F"q 1 1 , 1 mux 1 o 10 t ,)l j ~j rr==-1 e ... .-120 ·- 1-I -f 1--f 1--f 130 40 ~ .. ~~ .. ~------~50 TootD,CPT·I Flo' ZDIN1201CJiCI' , .. , • • • • APPENDIXC • GEOCON • BORING LOGS AND LABORATORY DATA • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ADVANCED GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • FIELD INVESTIGATION The field investigation was performed on July 16 and 26 and August 27, 2004, and consisted of a site reconnaissance and drilling ten exploratory small-diameter borings at the approximate locations shown on Figure 2. The small-diameter borings were drilled to depths varying from 16 to 3<M. Borings B 1 through B3 were drilled with a CME 55 drill rig equipped with hollow-stem auger . Borings B4 through B 10 were drilled with a mud rotary drilJ rig. Relatively undisturbed samples were obtained by driving a California Modified Sampler 12 inches with blows from a 140-pound hammer falling 30 inches. This split-tube sampler was equipped with l-inch-high by 23/a-inch-diameter brass sampler rings to facilitate sample removal and testing. Disturbed bulk samples were obtained from the boring's cuttings . The soil conditions encountered in the borings were visually examined, classified and logged in general accordance with the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Practice for Description and Identification of Soils (Visual-Manual Procedure D 2488). The logs of the exploratory borings are presented on Figures A-1 through A-10. The logs depict the various soil types encountered and indicate the depths at which samples were obtained. Project No. 07353-22-01 September 3, 2004 PROJECT NO. 07353-22-01 a: BORING B 1 zw~ ~ w~ w >-~ Qo~ DEF'TH " 5011. ~~~ ~~ 0::~ 0 s: ;:,~ IN SAMPLE ..J ~q !!2~ 0 0 ClASS ELEV. (MSL) -38 DATE COMPLETED 07-16-2004 lu.!!l~ FEET I'K>. I z >-e::. 1-::> (USCS) ZCI)~ oz :J 0 wWm 0:: ::EO 0:: EQUIPMENT CME55 a.C::~ c 0 " MATERIAL DESCRIPTION 1-0 4u ASPHALT Bl-1 ··J .. ,-l JNLtu::•t: TERRACE DEPOSITS 1-'l1'1 Medium dense, moist. brown, Silty, fine to medium SAND 1- 1-2 -:., r!· 1-15 3.8 81-2 104.8 1-.J. ·l 1-··j-_J., 1-4 • •• J-J· r-:If· 1-·1. ·l SM 1-23 102.1 5.8 Bl-3 ·l~ I 1-6 -:'11·! - !--:1-l .,. l ., 1-8 -_l ·.t '. - !-:I fl :1-/!· 1-10 -l''! -52 Bl-4 ~~ '----------------------------~-----1----.11..1,~ _1~-L. -~ Hard, moist, tan-brown, CLAY 1- '-12 1- r -~ -Be~mes VCJY stiff and brown at 13 feet !- '-14 ~~ -CH !-81-S -37 94.1 26.0 c-16 -~ - .... i-18 -Vj -~ -'-· -------------------------------------------Bl-6 Medium dense, rnois<, brown, Silty, fine to medium SAND 36 96.0 4.1 SM i-20 1· BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FEET No groundWIIIer Hole fillr:d with cuttings mixed with I bag ponland cement Figure A-1, 7353-22-{)1.GPJ Log of Boring B 1, Page 1 of 1 SAMPLE SYMBOLS 0 ... SAMPUNG UNSUCCESSFUL !!§ .. DISTURBED OR BAG SAMPLE IJ ... STANDARD PENETRATION TEST iiiJ ... CHUNK SAMPLE II .. DRIVE SAMPLE (UNO!Sli.IRBED} :,: ·-WATER TABLE OR SEEPAGE NOT!;. THE LOG OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS SHOWN HEREON APPLIES ONLY AT THE SPECIFIC BORING OR TRENCH LOCATION AND AT THE DATE INDICA TEO IT IS NO'! WARAANTED TO BE REPRESENTATIVE OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND TIMES. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • PROJECT NO. 07353-22-01 >-ffi BORING B 2 zw~ ~ w~ Oo. (!) 1-i=:Z~ o::-DEPTH ~ SOIL ~iZ SA.W'U: 0 ~~~ ~~ IN ..J CLASS ~q ~ ELEV. (MSL.) -35 DATE COMPLETED 07-16-2004 rurn3: fllW NO. z -f-FEET ~ (USCS) eng >-!1::. oz :::; 0 Zwm lr :Eo 0:: EQUIPMENT CME55 ~cr-0 0 (!) MATERIAL DESCRIPTION r 0 B2-J 4ftASPHALTCONCRETE :J. l·l TERRACE DEPOS1TS 1--li ., Medium dense, moist, red-brown. Silty, fme to medium SAND r-2 -:.1 ~-I· -B2-2 SM 30 118.4 5.7 '--:l.l r-lj., r-4 -:., i"!' i- 1--:1. ·l r-5016" !08.3 9.5 B2-3 "!".l ., r-6 -.·J t., r- r--~~ r-----------------------~----------r----------· Very stiff, moist, brown, CLAY f-8 -~ - i--~ ,.... i-10 -B2-4 CH -21 96.2 26.2 ,... -~ - i-12 -~ -B2·5 '--- -14 ~ - f--~ -_1.8_ B2-6 ------------~---------------------~-lO.J..L 16 -Dense, moist, tan, tine to coarse SAND 18 -.. SP r- i--r-46 96.8 4.4 B2-7 -20 BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FEET No groundwater Hole lliled with cuttings mixed with I bag ponland cement Figure A-2, 7353-22-o1.GPJ Log of Boring B 2, Page 1 of 1 0 ... SAMPliNG UNSUCCESSFUL ~ ... DIST\J!tBEO OR BAG SAMPLE SAMPLE SYMBOLS IJ ... STANDARD PEN..=TIU.T!ON TEST liJ ... CHUNK SAMPLE II ... DRIVE SAMPlE (UNOISTURBED) l: .. WATER TABLE OR S!':i:PAGE NOTE. TH: LOG OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS SHOWN HEREON APPLieS ON!. VAT lHE SPECIFIC BORING OR TRENCH LOCATION AND AT THE DATE INDICATED. IT JS NOT WARRANTED TO BE REPRESENTATIVE OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT 07liER LOCATIONS AND TIMES . l'&±t • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • PROJECT NO. 07353-22-01 >-ffi BORING 8 3 Zw~ >-w~ 1-Ou~ !:: DEPTH (!) ~ SOIL i=z Cl)~ a:~ 0 ~~~ zu... :~I- IN SAMPlE ...J :gq 1-ffi 0 ~ CLASS ELEV. (MSL.} -32 DATE COMPLETED 07-16-2004 fii!:2o 6!z FEET NO. r ,_!!:., 1-:::> (USCS) z(IJ_, ::; ~ w&!m a:: ~0 EQUIPMENT CME55 II. -0 (.) 0 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION r-0 83-1 :i· -l UNDOCUMENTED Fn.UALLUVIUM l.~ ., SM Medium dense, moist, dark-brown, Silty, fine to medium SAND 1- c-2 -.. f.,. 83-2 :r TERRACE DEPOSITS II 113.8 6.8 ~ Firm, moist, brov.n. Sandy SILT r-ML ,... 4 -1-~~: . -1---------------------------------r-----------83-3 ~ Finn, moist, brown, CLAY 12 6 1- ~ CH -Gravel at 7 feet '- 8 i-~ t-10 -83-4 ~ _31_ .!.0.23.. _tL _ ---------------------------------1-Dense, moist, gray-brown, fine to coarse SAND r-12 t- ~ -... 1- -14 -SP 1- -83-5 .. t-46 110.2 3.8 16 -t- --1--Gravelleyer at 17 feet 18 r- r -83-6 ~-4.2._ _.J~5-_31t. 1-20 ~ CL --'H;d.-~-;,; . .:i;~~ cu vSl-ol'>IE --------------- BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FEET Hole filled with cuttings mixed with 1 bag portland cement FigureA·3, 7353·22.01.GPJ Log of Boring 8 3, Page 1 of 1 0 ... SAMPLING UNSUCCESSFUL ~ ... OJSTURB..9) OR BAG SAMPlE SAMPLE SYMBOLS IJ ,., STANDARD PENeTRATION TEST fiiJ ... ~SAMPlE II ... DlWE SAMPLE (UNOISTURBED) ~ ... WATER TABLE OR SEEPAGE NOTE: THE LOG OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS SHOWN HEREON APPliES ONlY AT THE SPECIFIC BORING OR TRENCH LOCATlON AND AT THE DATE INDICATED. IT IS ND7 WARRANTED TO BE REPRESENTATIVE OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND TIMES M:;t~ . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • PROJECT NO. 07353-22-01 a: BORING 8 4 >-w 1-DEPTH (!) ~ sou.. 0 IN SAMPLE 5 CLASS 0 ELEV. (MSL) -38 DATE COMPLETED FEET NO. r z ..... 5 (IJSCS) ::::i ffi EQUIPMENT MUD ROTARY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION 1-0 -~ '·l TERR~CE DEPOSIT r-.l-i ., Very dense, moist, red-brown. Silty, fine to medium SAND i-2 -:If! 84-1 _.j ·l -l 1 ·1 '"" 4 -:'1 f-1· .-]. ·l 1--84-2 li., 6 -:.1 :-~- -:1-·l ., 1 . 8 -.•·J I_ :If! -.-1. ·l . ,.1 .I SM 10 -_l 'J I B4-3 :I fl -Becomes tan -brown at I 0 feet .1-., 12 l~ 'I .J {J . -: i. t ·I 1-14 l 1'1 -, I_,. 1--B4-4 :-i' ( .-l. ·l ,... 16 -l!'l r--:! f [ ·i ... , r-18 li ., i--.'j ~--l 84-5 ·l. ~ :j 20 BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FEET No groundwater encountered Hole filled with 15 gallons of bentonite slurry Figure A-4, Log of Boring 8 41 Page 1 of 1 SAMPLE SYMBOLS 0 .. SAMPliNG UNSUCCESSFUL !!§ ... DlSTIJRBED OR BAG SAMPLE IJ .. STANDARD PENETRATION TEST iiJ .. CHUNK SAMPLE Zw~ ~ g~~ co~ ~<(/) zu. li;~ ~q 07-26-2004 w-o >-!!:. zrD..J wwle. a: a. a: 0 5016" 119.2 65 110.9 i- 1- 1- 1- i-65 - - t-63 109.4 - 78 106.7 II -· DRIVE SAMPLE (UNDISTURBED) ~ .• WATER TABLE OR SEEPAGE NOTE: TI-lE LOG OF SUBSURFACE CONDffiONS SHOWN HEREON APPLIES ONLY AT THE SPECIFIC BORING OR TRENCH L00.110N AND AT THE DATE INDICATED IT IS NOT WARRANTED TO Bl! REPRESENTATIVE OF SUBSURFACE CONDffiONS AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND TIMES • wii' a:-:>I-~;;m 5~ :eo 0 11.9 5.2 i 15.1 16.4 ~---------....... -..... ----------........... ~~--. ·-----·· ---• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 0 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • • PROJECT NO. 07353-22..01 >-ffi BORING B 5 Zw~ ~ wi .... Qo~ DEPTH § ~ SOIL 1-Z Ci.)....,. a:~ SMI?Le ~~ zu.. i:£ IN ~q NO. 0 ~ ClASS ELEV. (MSL.) -15 DATE COMPLETED 07-26-2004 li:i~§ Cl.)l'ol. FEET i!= ::;, (USCS) zfa_, >-t!:. 0~ ::; 0 !fa::el a: :EO a: EQUIPMENT MUD ROTARY 0 c (!) MATERIAL DESCRIPTION 1-0 -1. i·l U~DOCUME~1ED~ALL~ -··i·-~ ., Loose, moist, tan and brown, Silty, fine to coarse SAND .. 2 ."j t.,. B5-1 -~ L SM lJ lll.5 14.1 : ·r -l 1'1 4 :'1 :-,. :J. ·l -7-:.t;% ------------------------------------------B5·2 //; Loose to mediwn dense, moist, brown, Clayey, fme to coarse SAND 9 110.9 17.4 .. 6 ~/" '--7/~ -/./ a -/,/" ~/}. -(/" sc 10 -~//_ f-19 BS-3 /// -~/-~ _y_ f- // -Becomes saturated at II feet 12 -r{; 1- v./ -~It -I foot layer of gravel at 13 feet f- 14 -IY'~ Ill. ·l TERRACE DEPOSITS -Hard, saturated, gray-green, Sandy SLJT '-74/JQH 85-4 113.4 153 f-16 -r-ML 1-1- r-18 r- .. 85-5 -No recoverv -5016" BORING TERMINAlED AT 19.5 FEET Groundwater encountered at 11 feet Hole filled with 15 gallons of bentonite sluny Figure A-5~ 7353-22-0'I.GPJ Log of Boring B 5, Page 1 of 1 IJ ... STANDARD PENEIAATIOH T!:ST iJ ... CHUNK SAMPLE II ... DRIVE SAMPLE (UNDISTUltSEDJ .f_ ... WA.TER TABLE OR SEEPAGE 0 ... SAMPLING UNSUCCESSFUL 1!!1 ... DISTURBED OR BAG SAMPLE SAMPLE SYMBOLS NOTE: THE LOG Of SUBSURFACE CONOinONS SHOWN HEREON APPLIES ONLY AT THE SPECIFIC BORING OR TI!ENCH LOCATION AND AT THE DATE INDICATED. IT IS NOT WAAAAN1dJ TO BE REPRESENTATIVE OF SUBSURfACE CONDITIONS AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND TIMES I • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • PROJECT NO. 07353-22-01 cr BORING 8 6 Zw~ t: wit w >-~ Oot DEPTH (!) SOil i~(ij Ci.i-:-cr- SAMPLE 0 ~ ZIJ.. ;:)I- IN ...J ClASS ~q t-Z 0 0 ELEV. (MSL.) -16 DATE COMPLETED 07-26-2004 li:iC'IJ~ (/)w FEET NO. :r z -o >-!!:. -I- 1-;::) (USCS) zffi..J oz ~ ~ :to :; EQUIPMENT MUD ROTARY ~a: e. 0 (!) MATERIAL DESCRIPTION 0 ·I. '·l UNDOCUMENTED FILUALLUVJtil\f -·l1 ·r Mediwn dense, moist, brown, Silty, fine to coarse SAND - ! f. I· 2 B6-l :I j ! SM 20 106.0 ·l '1. 8.0 ·.,:.i ·i 1- 4 -.. , t., . -·!j:j . ----------------------------------------- ---B6-2 ~ljl. MI.. Stiff, moist. gray-green, Sandy SILT 12 6 ·r.l 1----------,_,. :·l --'M;ii;~dwe.~isl,' ;;d:b;;)~;"Silty-; finelo~;;-~ SAND------- -·.,. 1 ., SM 1- I 't 8 . , .·I· ''.I TERRACE DEPOSITS .·1· •. -:r.t ., Very dense,' pale gray, Silty, fine to coarse SAND -SM I , . t· 10 B6-3 : j' '· -88/9 • 106.4 17.9 :l.l -~T -----------------------~--------------------· !: Hard, saturated, tan, Sandy SlLT 12 - -1-Jr ML 14 -1- 1--B6-4 ·j,. r 5013" ·I {. BORING TERMINATED AT 15.75 FEET Groundwater encountered ai I 1.5 feet Hole filled with 7 gallons of bemonite slUIJ)• Figure A-6, 7353-22·01 GPJ Log of Boring B 6, Page 1 of 1 SAMPLE SYMBOLS 0 ... SAIIAPUNG UNSUCCESSFUL ~· .. DISTURBED OR BAG SAMPLE IJ ... STANDARD PENETRATION TEST II ... ORrvc SAMPLE (UNDISTURBED} fiiJ ... CHUNK SAMPLE ~ ... WATER TABLE OR SEEPAGE NOTE: THE LOG OF SUBSURFACE CONDmONS SHOWN HEREON APPLIES ONLY AT THE SPECIFIC BORING OR 'TRENCH lOCATION AND AT THE DATE INDICA TEO. IT IS NOT WARRANTED TO BE REPRESENTATIVE OF SUBSURFACE CONOlnONS AT OTHER lOCATIONS ANO TIMES . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • PROJECT NO. 07353-22..01 1%: BORING 8 7 Zw-~ w~ >-w our: DEPTH (!) !;C i=~u. in-:-cr- SAMPlE g ~ son. gt;~ zu.. ::J!z IN tgq ~~ NO. 0 CLASS ELEV. (MSl.) -14 DATE COMPLETED 07-26-2004 FEET X z ~osg >-!!:. t: :::1 (USCS) ..i ~ wH:!IIl cr :EO EQUIPMENT MUD ROTARY Q. -0 0 (!) MATERIAL DESCRIPTION 1-0 ·1. '·l Ul\'DOCUMEN1'ED FILIJALLUVIUM f--·l1'! Medium dense, moist, orange-brown, Silty, fmc to coarse SAND r-·, t r· r-2 -B7-1 :1 (· f-11 :l-l r--:r.t·, 1- r-4 -:I t·l· ~ ·l. ·l SM 1--87-2 'l1'1 -Becomes gray r 25 112.5 16.6 1-6 -.. r. i· '- : l i t r--:1. ·l l i 'I r-8 -.·d-i· ~ -·.~ ... ,. • I• i 'I -Layer of asphalt concrete at 9 feet -10 -~-~..:.!·-----------------------------------,... ___ -------B7-3 :1-1·l Soft, wet, dark gray, Sandy Sll.. T; organic odor 4 -l i . . 'f I :J. ,.. 12 I '·I -Becomes saturated at 11.5 feet .. i.; f. •J• -·.,._l ., f- I t '· 14 . '[ MI.. 1'- : I 1_.1· -lj., r 5 105.2 14.9 B7-4 16 -:'1 : ,. f- J ·l 1'-'f i . 18 . ·r I 1-: ll·l r--!->]-,.1----------------~----------------1----------J .. , Medium dense, saturated, dark gray, Silty, fme to coarse SAND 1-20 87-5 /'. J I -15 :'1; , . SM -:1 ·l 1-22 -l.j ., f- 1--., j_, . '- ?o +'f -1 foot gravel layer at 23 feet :... 24 -11it) ·:!·1·:1· TERR.4.CE DEPOSITS SM Verv den~ ~er li!!ln tan Sil"• fin~" to coRI'!ll" SAND Figure A-7, 7353-~l.GPJ Log of Boring 8 7, Page 1 of 2 0 ... SAMPLING UNSUCCESSFUL 3j ... DISTURBED OR BAG SAMPLE IJ ... STANDARD PENETRATION TEST ~ ... CHUNK SAMPLE SAMPLE SYMBOLS II ... DRIVE SAMPLE (UNDISTURBED) ;! ... WATER TABlE OR SEEPAGE NOTE. THE LOO OF' SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS SHOWN HEREON APPLIES ONLY AT THE SPECIFIC BORING OR TRENCH lOCATION AND AT THE OATE INDICATED. IT IS NOT WARRANTED TO BE REPRESENTATIVE OF' SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND TIMES . /,;~-'--- • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • PROJECT NO. 07353-22-01 0: BORING 8 7 zw~ ~ w# >-w 1-~~t;; DEPTH (!) ~ SOil li)"'!'-o::- SAMPLE 0 j5cn zu. ::l£ IN _. )gq Ia!!! 0 0 ClASS ELEV. (MSL.) -14 DATE COMPLETED 07-21)..2004 IUcnS: FEET NO. ~ z -o >!!::. :J (USCSJ zffia5 oz ::i ~ 0:: ::EO EQUIPMENT MUD ROTARY ~c::-0 0 (!) MATERIAL DESCRIPTION f-.1-I ."i· B7-6 5016" 113.1 15.6 1-26 -·:-j ., 1-l•t ., .1· 1--. ! ~ i f-J • :-1. '·l SM 28 -'j" 1 'l 1- l'l. 1--:.I i· ,. i- -f. ·l f-30 -B7-7 ,. i ., 1-5015" BORING TERMINATED AT 30.5 FEET Groundwal.er encountered at 1 1.5 feet Hole filled with 25 gallons ofbcntonite sluny ,, Figure A-7, 7353-22-01 GPJ Log of Boring B 7, Page 2 of 2 SAMPLE SYMBOLS 0 ... SAMPUNG UNSUCCESSFUL §§ •. OIS1\JRaeD OR eAG SAMPLE [) .. STANDARD PENETRATION TEST iJ ... CHUNK SAMPLE II ... DRIVE SAMPLE (UNDISTURBED) .!'. ... WATER TABLE OR SEEPAGE NOTE. TME LOG OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS SHOWN HEREON APPliES ONLY AT '!l-IE SPECIFIC BORING OR TRENCH LOCATION AND AT THE DATE INDICATED IT IS NOT WARRANTED TO BE REPReSENTATIVE OF SUBSURF,.CE CONDITIONS "T OTHER LOCAilONS AND TIMES • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • PROJECT NO. 07353-22-01 lr BORINGS 8 Zw->-wi >-w Qot:: 1- DEPTH 0 !.( ii.i~ 0:~ SAMPlE 0 s: SOIL ~~~ zu. ~~ Ill ...J cv.ss w· 0 0 ELEV. (MSL) -10 DATE COMPLETED 08-27-2004 oq ml!! FEET NO. ~ 5 lii~o >~ (USCS) z"'...J oz ::; ~ wWm tr ::Eg EQUIPMENT MUD ROTARY a.«-0 Cl MATERIAL DESCRIPTION r-0 ~/} UNDOCUMENTED FILUALLUVJUM r--{// Very dense_ moist, brown, Clayey, fme to coarse SAND r- :-2 -7/~ -B8-I /./. sc 53 '--/>~; v// r 4 -fl· c.. -~~~-~~]ilt;~;w~~sMffi~~~~1---------------- --lj., 7 88-2 :-, r~-6 -c.. ·J .. ·l -lj'! SM _., t.,. ,y: .. 8 -. ~ . - :1. '·l -l { ., 10 -..:.!~..l· 1----------------------------------r-----------B8-3 J ·l Loose, saturated, black, Silty, fme to coarse SAND and GRAVEL 7 'J-~'l 1- .if t I .~ r-12 :I J ! r- lq·l SM r--~-t ., r -, a r 14 :J { l f- r-~~:JJ ------------------------------------------B8-4 Loose, saturated, gray, fine to medium SAND 6 1-16 i-.. :-18 - -1-SP .. -20 -Becomes medium dense, some concrete in sampler !-88-5 25 1-1- -22 -r - 24 .. 1--Gravel layer at 24 feet Figure A-8, 7Jii3-22-01.GPJ Log of Boring B 8, Page 1 of 2 SAMPLE SYMBOLS 0 .. , SAMPLING UNSUCCESSFUl 1!!1 ... DISTURBED OR BAG SAMPLE IIJ ... STANDARD PENETRATION TEST fiiJ .. CHUNK SAMPlE Ill ... DRIVE SAMPLE (l!NOISTUR9EO) ~ ... WATER TABLE OR SEEPAGE NOTE THE LOG Of SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS SHOWN HEREON APPUES ON!. Y AT THE SPECIFIC BORING OR TRENCH LOCATIOI>I AND AT TilE DATE INOICATEO. rr IS NOT WARRANTED TO BE REPRESENTATIVE OF SUBSURFACE COIIDITIONS AT OiliER LOCATIONS AND '11MES • • • • • • • • • • • • i i. i •• • • • • I le I • • • • • ! t • • • •• t • • • • PROJECT NO. 07353-22-01 rr BORINGS 8 z~ ....... ~ w~ >-w Q t DEPTH (!) !;( SOIL ii).-,. IC~ 0 ~ i~ra :ZlL :)I- IN SAMPLE --' :gq 1-z ~ ClASS ELEV. (MSL.) -10 DATE COMPLETED 08-27-2004 ... ~~ !I)W FEET NO. z w-o )-!!:. ~§ ::) (USCS) m(/.)..J ~ Wm It: ~ EQUIPMENT o..lr~ 0 (!) MUD ROTARY r-MATERIAL DESCRIPTION BS-6 :J. '·l Medium dense, saturated, gray, Silty, fine to medium SAJ\'D, some shells 2S r-25 -.,.1 .I -:·;-;.,. SM - 28 - :1-{l ~~~ TERRACE DEPOSITS -~~ Very dense, sarurated, gray, Clayey, fine to coarse SANDSTONE ~ *i1: 30 -•%(: BS-7 . ;i:• ~ 50/4" -~1j -No recovery 1-~%'#': 32 -:(.~~ 1- -rx« 1-~~ 1-34 -~1~ 1-ff: sc 1--BS-8 ··~~ -98110" ~i~ i-36 -~;r.: '-- ~~~ -~;;(..· 1-/.~: '-38 «-?: 1-;.;i(., •. -:,:(.~ 1-~~~ 40 -~Z.?-1 B8-9 0).??: -No recovery 60/6" :~i Y.· . BORING TERMINATED AT 41 FEET Groundwater encountered at 8 feet Hole filled with 40 gal. of bentonite sluny Figure A-8, 7353--22-01.GPJ Log of Boring B 8, Page 2 of 2 0 ... SAAIPUNG UNSUCCESSFUL ~ ... DISTUR8ED OR BAG SAMPLE SAMPLE SYMBOLS IJ ... STANDARD PENeTRATION TEST ~ ••• CHUNK SAMPLE II -DRIVE SAMPLE (UNDISTURBED) .!: ... WATER TABLE OR SEEPAGE NOTE· THE LOG OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS SHOWN HEREON APPUES ONLY AT THE SPECIFIC BORING OR TRENCH LOCATION AND AT THE DATE INOICI\TED IT IS NOT WARRANTED 10 BE REPRE.SENTATIVE OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND TIMES . ~:- • • • • • • • • • • • •• I • I • • i le • • i • I • I i • : . • I • i •• I j • •• ~. I ,. I • • • PROJECT NO. 07353-22..()1 c:: BORING 8 9 ~W-:-~ UJ~ >-UJ ..... -01-DEPTH (!) ~ SOIL ~-~~ 0...-:-c::~ SAMPLE g ~~(/) zu. :::>~ IN ~q ~-'w NO. 0 0 ClASS ElEV. (MSL) -12 DATE COMPLETED 08-27·2004 ..... 3: ~ ... FEET :r. z w-o >-!:!;. ;-. :::> (t.JSCS} zf3..J oz ~ 0 ~ll:~ 0: :!:0 II: EQUIPMENT MUD ROTARY 0 0 Cl MATERIAL DESCRIPTION 0 ;/.·/; UNDOCUMENTED FILUALLUVIUJ\f -'/ Loose, moist, brown, Clayey, fine to coarse SAND {// 2 -;-/-( //. sc -'/// @ 4 --· ---------------------------------f----------.fl::j. Dense. moist, red-bro\YD, Silty, fine to coarse SAND, boulders and debris ;--li ., 1-47 B9-l .. j ~., . SM ,... 6 BORING TERMINATED AT 6 FEET No groundwater encountered Hole filled with cuttings mixed with bentonite Figure A-9, 1'353-22.01.GPJ Log of Boring 8 9, Page 1 of 1 SAMPLE SYMBOLS 0 ... SMIPI.ING UNSUCCESSFUL ~ ••. DISTURBED OR BAG SAMPlE I] ... STANDARD PENETAATION'T£ST f!J .. CHUNk SAMPLE 1111 -· 0/WE SAMPLE !UNDISTURBED) :f-WATERTASLEORSEEPAGE NOTE. THE LOG OF SUBSURFACE CONOmONS SHOWNHERI:ONAPPUESOM.YATTHe SPECIFIC 80R1NGORTRENCHtOCATION AND AT THE DATE INDICATED IT IS N01' WARRANTED 1'0 BE REPRESENTATIVE OF SUBSlJRI'ACE CONDITIONS AT OTHER LOCATIONS ANO TIMES i ... ~_-- • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • PROJECT NO. 07353-22-01 0:: BORING B 10 iSw'"":' ~ >-w (!) 1-_u,_ OEPlli ~ SOil ~~as !/)'"":' 0 jDlL: IN SAMPLE ..... ClASS 0 ~ ELEV.{MSL) -13 DATE COMPLETED 08-27~2004 !!!~ ol? FEET NO. ;: >-!!;. ;:) (USCS) ifilh..J :::; ~ wm 25 (!) EQUIPMENT MUD ROTARY ~~.a::-- MATERIAL DESCRIPTION 0 v/) UNDOCUMENTED FlU.JALLUVIUM -(// Dense, moist, red-brown, Clayey, fine to coarse SAND 1- 2 -~/~ 1-/./ -BIO-I v// '--46 4 -Vj} v.--:0 -BI0-2 ~<> sc -Becomes very loose at S feet !'// 4 6 -~/-~ -f/; ,!: v./j -Becomes saturated at 7 feet 8 -/'· v<; -[;'/. -/./ 1-10 -/: ---------------------------------1-------P-.% BI0-3 //) Loose, saturated, dark gray to black, Clayey, fine to coarse SAND, slight 7 '--{// organic odor 1- -12 -(/(, 1-// . --V:// 1-//} 1-14 -./: 1-v--:~ i--v/· '-BI0-4 ·/ sc -Becomes medium dense 12 ///. 1-16 -t~; f- i--(// i-18 -~/} /'· /.{/; '--?/' // 1-20 d' -------------------------------------~().} ---BIO-S Medium dense, saturated, light-tan. Silty, line SAND . 39 1--lj ., 1- i-22 -.·j J-!· SM ·I .. ,. 'j ' '-,. I -') '-24 -·r I· ··-~~ TERRACE DEPOSITS ~~;?· SC' Yen· dense. satul'llted . ...,,,.....,.'"' Clavet•. fine to medium SA' Figure A-10, Log of Boring B 10, Page 1 of 2 0 ... SAMPLING UNSUCCESSFUL ~ ... DISTIJRBEO OR BAG SAMPl.E SAMPLE SYMBOLS IJ .. STANDARD PENETRATIOtHEST iJ ... CHUNK SAMPLE II ... DRIVE SAMPLE (\JNOISTIJRBED) ,t .. WATER TABLE OR S!:E?AGE NOTE. THELOG OP SUBSURFACE CONDmONS SHOWN HEREON APPLIES ONLY AT THE SPECIFIC BORING OR TRENCH LOCATION AND ;.TTHE DATE INDICATED IT IS NOTWARRANIED TO EIE REPRESENTATIVE OF SUSSURFACE CONOtnONS AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND TIMES . w~ a::~ j2!z CI)W 0~ ~8 ---- --- ,.,,,.,_ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • PROJECT NO. 07353-22-(11 >-ffi BORING B 10 Zw~ ~ w# DEPTH C!l ~ Qot;:; CQ""': ~-0 ~ SOIL ~-~(;j ZLL ::Jf- "" SAMPlE ..J ClASS gt;~ w· t-Z 0 ELEV. (MSL.) -13 DATE COMPLETED 08-27-2004 oq cow FEET NO. ~ z w-o >-e:.. _.,_ :::> (USCS) ZCI)-' oz :J ~ 111 wm a: ::!:0 EQUIPMENT MUD ROTARY n.O::--0 0 C!l MATERIAL DESCRIPTION ,... BI0-6 ~~~ 60 ,... 26 -G{.~~ ,... if:~ ~ 28 ~~~ sc .:/'~ :(~~ - ,... 30 fz~: Bl0-7 ~· 85 :{~~ BORING TERMINATED AT 31 FEET Groundwater encountered at 7 feet Hole filled with 40 gal. ofbentonite slurry Figure A-101 7353-22-D!.GPJ Log of Boring B 10, Page 2 of 2 0 ... SAMPLING UNSUCCESSFUl. ll§ ... OISl\JRSED OR SAG SAMPI.E II ... DRIVE SAMPI.E (UNDISTURBED) l', ... WATER TA.SLE OR SEePAGE IJ ... STANOA.RD PENETRATION TEST iJ ... CHUNK SAMPLE SAMPLE SYMBOLS NOTE. THE t.OG OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS SHOWN HEREON APPLIES ONLY AT THE SPECIFIC BORING OR TRENCH LOCATION ANO AT THE DATE INDICA TEO. 11' IS NOT WARRANTED TO BE REPRESENTATIVE OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTliER LOCATIONS AND TIMES ; • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • LABORATORY TESTING Laboratory tests were performed in accordance with generally accepted test methods of the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) or other suggested procedures. Samples were subjected to drained direct shear, grain-size analysis, consolidation, expansion index, R-value, and laboratory maximum dry density and optimum moisture content tests. One sample was tested for its corrosivity characteristics. Results of the grain-size analysis and consolidation tests are presented on Figures B 1 through B3. Results of the other laboratory tests are presented on Tables B-1 through B-VI. In situ moisture and dry density tests are presented on the boring Jogs (Appendix. A) • Sample No. Bl-4 B6-1 TABLE B-1 SUMMARY OF LABORATORY DIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS ASTM D 308Q-98 Dry Density Moisture Content Unit Cohesion Angle of Shear (pcf) {%) (psf) Resistance (degrees) 114.5 14.5 630 33 106.0 8.0 370 36 TABLE B-11 SUMMARY OF LABORATORY EXPANSION INDEX TEST RESULTS ASTM D 4829·95 Sample Moisture Content Dry Expansion No • Before Test(%) After Test{%) Density (pet) Index B2-5 13.8 36.8 99.7 181 Project No. 07353-22-01 -B-1-September 3, 2004 ~~: • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • I • • TABLE B-Ill SUMMARY OF LABORATORY MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY AND OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT TEST RESULTS ASTM D 1557-02 Maximum Optimum Sample No. Description Dry Density Moistun Content (pet) (%dry wt.) B3-l Dark brown Silty, fine to coarse SAND 134.0 8.1 TABLE B-IV SUMMARY OF LABORATORY RESISTANCE VALUE TEST RESULTS ASTM 0 2844-99 Sample No. Description R-Value Bl-1 Reddish brown Silty, fine to medium SAND 65 with a trace of gravel TABLE B-V SUMMARY OF LABORATORY pH AND RESISTIVITY TEST RESULTS CALIFORNIA TEST METHOD NO. 643 Sample No • pH Minimum Resistivity (ohm-centimeters) B3-3 6.4 210 TABLE B-VI SUMMARY OF LABORATORY WATER-SOLUBLE SULFATE TEST RESULTS CALIFORNIA TEST METHOD NO. 417 Sample No. Water-Soluble Su1fate (%) B3-3 0.050 Project No. 07353-22-01 -B-2-September 3, 2004 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • PROJECT NO. 07353-22-01 GRAVEL SAND COARSE FINE COARSE MEDIUM FINE SILT OR ClAY U.S. STANDARD SIEVE SIZE 8 16 30 50 3" 1-112° 3/4'' 318" 4 110 'f ~ 0 40 60 1QO 200 100 I il I ,,, I ~~~ ~~k I I 111!1 I ::· I, i I i I '\~ IIi I : I : I ·~I \1; l I ~ 70,~~ ,~~:~-H+.~:H-+-+-~+,H++~+-~~~~~~~1 ~+-+---~44~~~~-+--~! ~ 60~'~~~=~1 -rt+H~-+-+--4+4+~~~--+'~· ~~+-~--~~~~+-~ ! ~:It--H-i' I '-+--+- 1 -It-'; ---+111H-H-I+-!-': 1--t-1----t+++-l +-+-+' \--+--\-4 ~+--1 ......;.+-»' t+++-'! +--i--1-i-:--++,++-t-!i '-+-!I ~~-----~ ~ 30!~·~~'·+-'~~~~:~J~~~~~~l~l~~ ~~~~~~1~1 '~'+-'~I ~ ! l I :. 1 1 ''J11ll'. I ·f II II l l 20 ! : I i I : ! I i ll i II ;'I I II l II I f I ! ': ·1 I ': . ! I II: II ! Ill I I 10 o:1 o.o u.( 01 I GRAIN SIZE IN MilliMETERS SAMPLE DEPTH (ft) CLASSIFICATION NATWC LL PL PI e 85-3 10.0 Sandy Sll T (Ml) iJ! 87-3 10.0 Clayey SAND (SC) GRADATION CURVE OCEAN STREET CONDOMINIUM CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA ~~22.01.0PJ Figure 8-1 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • PROJECT NO. 07353-22--<11 7353-22-01.GPJ SAMPLE NO. 67-4 -6 :-----lr----r---r-.....---r-:.-rr--....---r-r-:~..-.1, I ;-----.---r'--,---,~1,...., -4 ;--:, --+--1 -+--+--!-+-++++---+-' -+--+-t--+-' I +-++' I 1+---1-----+-l ~+-H--11 I 1. . II I J I ' 1 I I I APPLIED PRESSU.RE (kst) Initial Dly Denslty (pet) ., 105.2 I I Initial Saturation (%) r-~--~~--~~--~ Initial Water Content fl..) T 14.9 l I Sample Saturated at (l<sf) ~----~~--~----~ CONSOUDATION CURVE OCEAN STREET CONDOMINIUM CARLSBAD I CALIFORNIA 68.6 2.0 Figure 6-2 .. ~ . ~<· • • • PROJECT NO. 07353-22-01 • • SAMPLE NO. 85~2 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • -6! I I . I I I I -4! I l I -2 ,, I l I o, I --..__ I r [ z -.... I I ' 0 r..... ~ r---·1 I i= to-.. C3 2 I I ::::i I I~ I I r II I J I I I I 0 I rn I z l I ! 0 (,) i'--...i I 1-4 z tt-, 1'-K l 'l -~ l II w ~ w r---r--4-~ I I a.. J ~ I I I I 6! I I I i I i 1 II I I l I I l I . I I I I 8 I l I' I I I I I I I I I I I l i . II I I i I . I I 10 I l l 1 1 l , I . I I I I 16.1 i i lU ...JO APPLIED PRESSURE (ksf) • . • Initial Dry Density (pc;f) I 110.9 I J!nitlal Saturation (%) 93.2 Initial Water content (%) I 17.4 J J Sample Saturated at (ksf) 2.0 • • • CONSOliDATION CURVE • OCEAN STREET CONDOMINIUM • CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 7353.2:2.01.GPJ • Figure B-1 • • • ~, ., • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • P/W 1205-06 Report No. 1205-06-B-3 GENERAL EARTHWORK SPECIFICATIONS I. General A. General procedures and requirements for earthwork and grading are presented herein. The earthwork and grading recommendations provided in the geotechnical report are considered part of these specifications, and where the general specifications provided herein conflict with those provided in the geotechnical report, the recommendations in the geotechnical report shall govern. Recommendations provided herein and in the geotechnical report may need to be modified depending on the conditions encountered during grading . B. The contractor is responsible for the satisfactory completion of all earthwork in accordance with the project plans, specifications, applicable building codes, and local governing agency requirements. Where these requirements conflict, the stricter requirements shall govern . C. It is the contractor's responsibility to read and understand the guidelines presented herein and in the geotechnical report as well as the project plans and specifications. Information presented in the geotechnical report is subject to verification during grading. The information presented on the exploration logs depict conditions at the particular time of excavation and at the location of the excavation. Subsurface conditions present at other locations may differ, and the passage of time may result in different subsurface conditions being encountered at the locations ofthe exploratory excavations. The contractor shall perform an independent investigation and evaluate the nature of the surface and subsurface conditions to be encountered and the procedures and equipment to be used in performing his work. D. The contractor shall have the responsibility to provide adequate equipment and procedures to accomplish the earthwork in accordance with applicable requirements. When the quality of work is less than that required, the Geotechnical Consultant may reject the work and may recommend that the operations be suspended until the conditions are corrected . E. Prior to the start of grading, a qualified Geotechnical Consultant should be employed to observe grading procedures and provide testing of the fills for conformance with the project specifications, approved grading plan, and guidelines presented herein. All remedial removals, clean-outs, removal bottoms, keyways, and subdrain installations should be observed and documented by the Geotechnical Consultant prior to placing fill. It is the contractor's responsibility to appraise the Geotechnical Consultant of their schedules and notifY the Geotechnical Consultant when those areas are ready for observation. F. The contractor is responsible for providing a safe environment for the Geotechnical Consultant to observe grading and conduct tests . II. Site Preparation A. Clearing and Grubbing: Excessive vegetation and other deleterious material shall be sufficiently removed as required by the Geotechnical Consultant, and such materials shall be properly disposed of offsite in a method acceptable to the owner and governing agencies. Where applicable, the contractor may obtain permission from the Geotechnical Consultant, owner, and governing agencies to dispose of vegetation and other deleterious materials in designated areas onsite. B. Unsuitable Soils Removals: Earth materials that are deemed unsuitable for the support of fill shall be removed as necessary to the satisfaction of the Geotechnical Consultant . C. Any underground structures such as cesspools, cisterns, mining shafts, tunnels, septic tanks, wells, pipelines, other utilities, or other structures located within the limits of grading shall be removed and/or abandoned in accordance with the requirements of the governing agency and to the satisfaction of the Geotechnical Consultant. D. Preparation of Areas to Receive Fill: After removals are completed, the exposed surfaces shall be scarified to a depth of approximately 8 inches, watered or dried, as needed, to achieve a generally uniform moisture content that is at or near optimum moisture content. The scarified materials shall then be compacted to the project requirements and tested as specified . E. All areas receiving fill shall be observed and approved by the Geotechnical Consultant prior to the placement of filL A licensed surveyor shall provide survey control for determining elevations of processed areas and keyways . III. Placement of Fill ADVANCED GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • P/W 1205-06 Report No. I 205-06-B-3 A. Suitability of fill materials: Any materials, derived onsite or imported, may be utilized as fill provided that the materials have been determined to be suitable by the Geotechnical Consultant. Such materials shall be essentially free of organic matter and other deleterious materials, and be of a gradation, expansion potential, and/or strength that is acceptable to the Geotechnical Consultant. Fill materials shall be tested in a laboratory approved by the Geotechnical Consultant, and import materials shall be tested and approved prior to being imported . B. Generally, different fill materials shall be thoroughly mixed to provide a relatively uniform blend of materials and prevent abrupt changes in material type. Fill materials derived from benching should be dispersed throughout the fill area instead of placing the materials within only an equipment-width from the cut/fill contact. C. Oversize Materials: Rocks gre-dter than 8 inches in largest dimt:nsion shall lx: disposed of offsite or be placed in accordance with the recommendations by the Geotechnical Consultant in the areas that are designated as suitable for oversize rock placement. Rocks that are smaller than 8 inches in largest dimension may be utilized in the fill provided that they arc not nested and are their quantity and distribution are acceptable to the Geotechnical Consultant. D. The fill materials shall be placed in thin, horizontal layers such that, when compacted, shall not exceed 6 inches. Each layer shall be spread evenly and shall be thoroughly mixed to obtain a near uniform moisture content and uniform blend of materials. E. Moisture Content: Fill materials shall be placed at or above the optimum moisture content or as recommended by the geotechnical report. Where the moisture content of the engineered fill is less than recommended, water shalllx: added, and the fill materials shall be blended so that a near uniform moisture content is achieved. If the moisture content is above the limits specified by the Geotechnical Consultant, the fill materials shall be aerated by discing, blading, or other methods until the moisture content is acceptable . F. Each layer of fill shall be compacted to the project standards in accordance to the project specifications and recommendations of the Geotechnical Consultant. Unless otherwise specified by the Geotechnical Consultant, the till shall be compacted to a minimum of90 percent of the maximum dry density as determined by ASTM Te1>t Method: 01557-09 . G. Benching: Where placing fill on a slope exceeding a ratio of 5 to 1 (horizontal to vertical), the ground should be keyed or benched. The keyways and benches shall extend through all unsuitable materials into suitable materials such as firm materials or sound bedrock or as recommended by the Geotechnical Consultant. The minimum keyway width shall be 15 feet and extend into suitable materials, or as recommended by the geotechnical report and approved by the Geotechnical Consultant. The minimum keyway width for fill over cut slopes is also 15 teet, or as recommended by the geotechnical report and approved by the Geotechnical Consultant. As a general rule, unless otherwise recommended by the Geotechnical Consultant, the minimum width of the keyway shall be equal to 1/2 the height of the fill slope . H. Slope Face: The specified minimum relative compaction shall be maintained out to the finish face of fill and stabilization fill slopes. Generally, this may be achieved by overbuilding the slope and cutting back to the compacted core. The actual amount of overbuilding may vary as field conditions dictate. Alternately, this may be achieved by backrolling the slope face with suitable equipment or other methods that produce the designated result. Loose soil should not be allowed to build up on the slope face. If present, loose soils shall be trimmed to expose the compacted slope face . I. Slope Ratio: Unless otherwise approved by the Geotechnical Consultant and governing agencies, permanent fill slopes shall be designed and constructed no steeper than 2 to I (horizontal to vertical) . J. Natural Ground and Cut Areas: Design grades that are in natural ground or in cuts should be evaluated by the Geotechnical Consultant to determine whether scarification and processing of the ground and/or overexcavation is needed . K. Fill materials shall not be placed, spread, or compacted during unfavorable weather conditions. When grading is interrupted by rain, filing operations shall not resume until the Geotechnical Consultant approves the moisture and density of the previously placed compacted fill. IV. Cut Slopes A. The Geotechnical Consultant shall inspect all cut slopes, including fill over cut slopes, and shall be notified by the contractor when cut slopes are started . 4DV4NCED GEOTECHNIC4L SOLunONS, INC • ,, • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • P/W 1205-06 Report No. 1205-06-B-3 B. If adverse or potentially adverse conditions are encountered during grading, the Geotechnical Consultant shall investigate, evaluate, and make recommendations to mitigate the adverse conditions . C. Unless otherwise stated in the geotechnical report, cut slopes shall not be excavated higher or sleeper than the requirements of the local governing agencies. Short-term stability of the cut slopes and other excavations is the contractor's responsibility. V. Drainll!,re A. Backdrains and Subdrains: Backdrains and subdrains shall be provided in fill as recommended by the Geotechnical Consultant and shall be constructed in accordance with the governing agency and/or recommendations of the Geotechnical Consultant. The location of subdrains, especially outlets, shall be surveyed and recorded by the Civil Engineer . B. Top-of-slope Drainage: Positive drainage shall be established away from the top of slope. Site drainage shall not be permitted to flow over the tops of slopes . C. Drainage terraces shall be constructed in compliance with the governing agency requirements and/or in accordance with the recommendations of the Geotechnical Consultant. D. Non-erodible interceptor swales shall be placed at the top of cut slopes that face the same direction as the prevailing drainage . VI. Erosion Control A. All finish cut and fill slopes shall be protected from erosion and/or planted in accordance with the project specifications and/or landscape architect's recommendations. Such measures to protect the stope face shall be undertaken as soon as practical after completion of grading . B. During construction, the contractor shall maintain proper drainage and prevent the ponding of water. The contractor shall take remedial measures to prevent the erosion of graded areas until permanent drainage and erosion control measures have been installed . VII. Trench Excavation and Backfill A. Safety: The contractor shall follow all OSHA requirements for safety of trench excavations. Knowing and following these requirements is the contractor's responsibility. All trench excavations or open cuts in excess of 5 feet in depth shall be shored or laid back. Trench excavations and open cuts exposing adverse geologic conditions may require further evaluation by the Geotechnical Consultant. If a contractor fails to provide safe access for compaction testing, backfill not tested due to safety concerns may be subject to removal. B. Bedding: Bedding materials shall be non-expansive and have a Sand Equivalent greater than 30. Where permitted by the Geotechnical Consultant, the bedding materials can be densified by jetting . C. Backfill: Jetting of backfill materials is generally not acceptable. Where permitted by the Geotechnical Consultant, the bedding materials can be densified by jetting provided the backfill materials are granular, free-draining and have a Sand Equivalent greater than 30 . VIII. Geotechnical Observation and Testing During Grading A. Compaction Testing: Fill shall be tested by the Geotechnical Consultant for evaluation of general compliance with the recommended compaction and moisture conditions. The tests shall be taken in the compacted soils beneath the surface if the surficial materials are disturbed. The contractor shall a~sist the Geotechnical Consultant by excavating suitable test pits for testing of compacted till . B. Where tests indicate that the density of a layer of fill is less than required, or the moisture content not within specifications, the Geotechnical Consultant shall notify the contractor of the unsatisfactory conditions of the fill. The portions of the fill that are not within specifications shall be reworked until the required density and/or moisture content has been attained. No additional fill shall be placed until the last lift of till is tested and found to meet the project specifications and approved by the Geotechnical Consultant. C. If, in the opinion of the Geotechnical Consultant, unsatisfactory conditions, such as adverse weather, excessive rock or deleterious materials being placed in the fill, insufficient equipment, excessive rate of fill placement, results in a quality of work ADVANCED GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC . P/W 1205-06 Report No. 1205-06-B-3 that is unacceptable, the consultant shall notify the contractor, and the contractor shall rectifY the conditions, and if necessary, stop work until conditions are satisfactory. D. Frequency of Compaction Testing: The location and frequency of tests shall be at the Geotechnical Consultant's discretion. Generally, compaction tests shall be taken at intervals not exceeding two feet in fill height and 1,000 cubic yards of fill materials placed. E. Compaction Test Locations: The Geotechnical Consultant shall document the approximate elevation and horizontal coordinates of the compaction test locations. The contractor shall coordinate with the surveyor to assure that sufficient grade stakes are established so that the Geotechnical Consultant can determine the test locations. Alternately, the test locations can be surveyed and the results provided to the Geotechnical Consultant. P. Areas of till that have not been observed or tested by the Geotechnical Consultant may have to be removed and recompacted at the contractor's expense. The depth and extent of removals will be determined by the Geotechnical Consultant G. Observation and testing by the Geotechnical Consultant shall be conducted during grading in order for the Geotechnical Consultant to state that, in his opinion, grading has been completed in accordance with the approved geotechnical report and project specifications. H. Reporting of Test Results: After completion of grading operations, the Geotechnical Com;ultant shall submit reports documenting their observations during construction and test results. These reports may be subject to review by the local governing agencies. ADVANCED GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • DESIGN GRADE .. . ~ , ' ' EXISTING GRADE ..., ~~~· ~' ,, / / '..__.,_.r ,....,...,... "··"-• I ' ... ' /· ~ ..........,.,.,.......",..... • .•. ~ -:-:--.;NGINEERED FILL /" ...;: ~ ~"~~ .. ......... / .. . .. -__.,., ·' , REQUIRED BENCHING UNSUITABLE BEARING MATERIAL (REMOVE) CANYON SUBDRAIN PROFILE DIRECT SOLID OUTLET PIPE TO APPROVED DRAINAGE AREA PER PROJECT CIVIL ENGINEER CONSTRUCT DRAIN OUTLET A MINIMUM 1-FOOT CUTOFF WALL CONSISTING OF GROUT, CONCRETE, BENTONITE OR OTHER MATERIAL APPROVED BY ABOVE GRADE GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT VER 1.0 I< 20 FOOT MINIMUM >IE 5 FT.>! MIN . SOLID PIPE PERFORATED PIPE NOTE: LOCATION OF CANYON SUBDRAINS AND OUTLETS SHOULD BE DOCUMENTED BY PROJECT CIVIL ENGINEER. OUTLETS MUST BE KEPT UNOBSTRUCTED AT ALL TIMES. CANYON SUBDRAIN TERMINUS CANYON SUBDRAIN ADVANCED GEOTECHNICAL SOLUDONS CUTOFF WALL DIMENSIONS DETAIL 1 NTS • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 12-INCH MINIMUM ABOVE PIPE 6-INCHES MINIMUM, ADJACENT TO AND BELOW PIPE OPTION 1 FILTER MATERIAL: _MINIMUM VOLUME OF 9 CUBIC FEET PER LINEAL FOOT OF CAL TRANS CLASS 2 PERMEABLE MATERIAL 12-INCH MINIMUM ABOVE PIPE APPROVED FILTER --:t~. FABRIC, WITH 6-INCH OVERLAP 6-INCHES MINIMUM, ADJACENT TO AND BELOW PIPE OPTION 2 DRAIN MATERIAL: MINIMUM VOLUME OF 9 CUBIC FEET PER LINEAL FOOT OF 3/4-INCH MAX ROCK OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT SUBSTITUTE FILTER FABRIC: MIRAFI 140 FILTER FABRIC OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT SUBSTITUTE PIPE: 6 OR 8-INCH ABS OR PVC PIPE OR APPROVED SUBSTITUTE WITH A MINIMUM OF 8 PERFORATIONS (1/4-INCH DIAMETER) PER LINEAL FOOT IN BOTTOM HALF OF PIPE (ASTM 02751, SDR-35 OR ASTM D3034, SDR-35 ASTM 01527, SCHD. 40 OR ASTM D1785, SCHD. 40) ~ CONTINUOUS RUN IN EXCESS OF 500 FEET REQUIRES 8-INCH DIAMETER PIPE (ASTM 03034, SDR-35, ORASTM D1785, SCHD. 40) CANYON SUBDRAIN DRAIN 2-FT. MIN DRAIN MATERIAL ~~:~~BRie "/> "I2-FT. ____ ~·;'"o· · ·<.·;· MIN . . ~.. . . · .. _/_ ... _..,. ... 4-INCH SOLID 2-INCH MIN OUTLET PIPE BELOW PIPE OPTION 1 2-INCH MIN. BELOW PIPE DRAIN MA~ GRAVEL TRENCH TO BE FILLED WITH 314-INCH MAX ROCK OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT SUBSTITUTE FILTER FABRIC: MIRAF1140 FILTER FABRIC OR EQUIVALENT SUBSTITUTE WITH A MINIMUM 6-INCH OVERLAP VER 1.0 8AGS PIPE: 4-INCH ABS OR PVC PIPE OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT SUBSTITUTE WITH A MINIMUM OF 8 PERFORATIONS (1/4-INCH DIAMETER) PER LINEAL FOOT IN BOTTOM HALF OF PIPE (ASTM 02751, SDR-35 OR ASTM 03034, SOR-35 ASTM D1527, SCHD. 40 OR ASTM D1785, SCHD. 40) BUTTRESS/STABILIZATION DRAIN DRAIN SPECIFICATIONS DETAIL2 ADVANCED GEOTECHNICAL SOLIJTIONS NTS ,;: • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • VER 1.0 2%MIN. ~WIDTH~ CODE COMPLIANT KEYWAY WITH MINIMUM DIMENSIONS: TOE 2 FOOT MIN. HEEL 3 FOOT MIN. WIDTH 15 FOOT MIN. BLANKET FILL-AS REQUIRED BY GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT AND/OR CODE COMPLIANCE (3 FOOT MIN.) \ CODE COMPLIANT \ SETBACK, 15 FOOT MIN.~ \ G~{)<;;. ~r:,\G~ Q 2% - :::·· .. ::::::~::::::::::::::::::~ BENCH WIDTH VARIES )( NOTES: 1. DRAIN OUTLETS TO BE PROVIDED EVERY 100 FEET CONNECT TO PERFORATED DRAIN PIPE BY "L • OR "T" AT A MINIMUM 2% GRADIENT. 2. THE NECESSITY AND LOCATION OF ADDITIONAL DRAINS SHALL BE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD BY THE GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT. UPPER STAGE OUTLETS SHOULD BE EMPTIED ONTO CONCRETE TERRACE DRAINS . 3. DRAIN PIPE TO EXTEND FULL LENGTH OF STABILIZATION/BUTTRESS WITH A MINIMUM GRADIENT OF 2% TO SOLID OUTLET PIPES . 4. LOCATION OF DRAINS AND OUTLETS SHOULD BE DOCUMENTED BY PROJECT CIVIL ENGINEER. OUTLETS MUST BE KEPT UNOBSTRUCTED AT ALL TIMES . NTS 8AGS STABILIZATION/BUTTRESS FILL DETAIL 3 ADVANCED GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTIONS ',fi/·- • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • * THE "CUr PORTION OF THE SLOPE SHALL BE EXCAVATED AND EVALUATED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTING THE "FILL» PORTION >I -2%MIN. f.E-WIDTH ->1 SUITABLE BEARING MATERIAL SUITABLE BEARING MATERIAL VER 1.0 8AGS NOTES: CODE COMPLIANT KEYWAY WITH MINIMUM DIMENSIONS: TOE: 2 FOOT MIN . HEEL: 3 FOOT MIN. WIDTH: 15 FOOT MIN . 1. THE NECESSITY AND LOCATION OF DRAINS SHALL BE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD BY THE GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT 2. SEE DETAIL 2 FOR DRAIN SPECIFICATIONS FILL OVER CUT SLOPE ADVANCED GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTIONS DETAIL4 NTS • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • A 1:1 MINIMUM PROJECTION FROM DESIGN SLOPE TOE TO TOE OF KEYVI/AY -----~ .. ........ . . €. ,.,..,. . ., .. ~G G?J-.0 /." . " €-Y-\51~ -:-:.---:-. -:-: .. _...·:..;:......".....,.,......,..,..........,..-~ RE-GRADE NATURAL SLOPE WITH ENGINEERED FILL _... _... . . . ~6-.J~l ;. -~. . . . .. \~~e .... ,. . / . . . . . . . G ~~~~\~.; r-.. ___ _, · • · · ~F'-~\~ ;. .. BENCH WIDTH · • · ~F'-~\..~ ~-· ;. .. VARIES . /.. ..:,s~\ . . . .. --......-----~E---~ . .. ~\... . . .. I 'f IE >I / . .. .-4 FOOT MIN . BENCH HEIGHT !~ ... · ... ,. VARIABL '. BACKCUT • . .. .- .... ,' .. , ... --_;' ~ ·. >> .. _... . ·......_--::::::::::::::=~:k SUITABLE BEARING MATERIAL VER 1.0 1-E-WIDTH~ CODE COMPLIANT KEYWAY WITH MINIMUM DIMENSIONS: TOE: 2 FOOT MIN. HEEL: 3 FOOT MIN . WIDTH: 15 FOOT MIN . NOTES: 1. WHEN THE NATURAL SLOPE APPROACHES OR EXCEEDS THE DESIGN GRADE SLOPE RATIO, SPECIAL RECOMMENDATIONS ARE NECESSARY BY THE GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT 2. THE GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT WILL DETERMINE THE REQUIREMENT FORAND LOCATION OF SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE SYSTEMS . 3. MAINTAIN MINIMUM 15 FOOT HORIZONTAL WIDTH FROM FACE OF SLOPE TO BENCH/BACKCUT aAGS FILL OVER NATURAL SLOPE ADVANCED GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTIONS DETAILS NTS ._ _________________________ ...,. ____ " "L • • • • • • • • • • • • L • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • EXISTING GRADE --- VER 1.0 IE-WIDTH -7l CODE COMPLIANT KEYWAY WITH MINIMUM DIMENSIONS: TOE: 2 FOOT MIN . HEEL: 3 FOOT MIN. WIDTH: 15 FOOT MIN . NOTES: BENCH WIDTH [Q] VARIES I< 4FOOTMIN . BENCH HEIGHT >I ,... SUITABLE BEARING MATERIAL 1. MAINTAIN MINIMUM 15 FOOT HORIZONTAL WIDTH FROM FACE OF SLOPE TO BENCH/BACKCUT 2. SEE DETAIL 2 FOR DRAIN SPECIFICATIONS 8AGS SKIN FILL CONDITION DETAIL 6 ADVANCED GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTIONS NTS • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • l -.. ... VER 1.0 r UNSUITABLE BEARING MATERIAL (REMOVE) --.,--,..,.... 15 FOOT MIN. ., I I ., . ., .. . ;.. · .... ...-------' -.. .. BENCH WIDTH VARIES I< >I 4 FOOT MIN. BENCH HEIGHT 1 FOOT TILT BACK (MIN.) T I -------1/ ______ ., >I SUITABLE BEARING MATERIAL NOTES: 1. IF RECOMMENDED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT, THE REMAINING CUT PORTION OF THE SLOPE MAY REQUIRE REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT WITH AN ENGINEERED FILL 2. "W" SHALL BE EQUIPMENT WIDTH (15 FEET) FOR SLOPE HEIGHT LESS THAN 25 FEET. FOR SLOPES GREATER THAN 25 FEET, "W" SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT. AT NO TIME SHALL "W" BE LESS THAN H/2 3. DRAINS WILL BE REQUIRED (SEE DETAIL 2) aAGS PARTIAL CUT SLOPE STABILIZATION DETAIL 7 ADVANCED 6EOTECHNICAL SOLUTIONS NTS • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • --EXISTING G~t-- --------- DESIGN GRADE 5FEET MIN. ' ' ' ' 5FEET MIN . ~/ ~~ 1\.·,~ ',•7 , ' --- / ** SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE {, SUITABLE BEARING MATERIAL REMOVE AND REPLACE WITH ENGINEERED FILL DESIGN GRADE NOTES: CUT LOT OVEREXCAVATION SUITABLE BEARING MATERIAL CUT-FILL LOT OVEREXCAVATION 5FEET MIN. ... * SEE REPORT FOR RECOMMENDED DEPTHS, DEEPER OVEREXCAVATION MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT BASED ON EXPOSED FIELD CONDITIONS ** CONSTRUCT EXCAVATION TO PROVIDE FOR POSITIVE DRAINAGE TOWARDS STREETS, DEEPER FILL AREAS OR APPROVED DRAINAGE DEVICES BASED ON FIELD CONDITIONS VER 1.0 8AGS ADVANCED GEOTECHNICAl SOLUTIONS CUT & CUT-FILL LOT OVEREXCAVATION DETAIL 8 NTS • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • DESIGN GRADE ADDITIONAL ENGINEERED FILL (TO DESIGN GRADE) --~ EXISTING GRADE _ - - - -7 . . ·.. . . --------/ -----e----//. ', /~ . VER 1.0 ' .... , / ' TEMPORARY // . ',..,_ ENGINEERED FILL //. · · · · · · ', (TO BE REMOVED) * // · UNSUITABLE . ENGINEERED FILL (EXISTING) ', 7. .;_":-// . . eEARING MATERIAL , . 7 /. · · · (REM0\1E) . · . · ' // ...., //. . . .... , /~ .. .. .. .. . . ...., / ' / .. -' / . . -... - ' / .. -< .., -• --~ ·--,::.~ '-', • --• :--Y~ •:-~·---··>:.,- "' - -.. .. '~·-· .IJII!I -~ ., ~---, ···->---:.·· :. ,_-. ;<<: .··,:·. ·: SUITABLE BEARING MATERIAL * REMOVE BEFORE PLACING ADDITIONAL ENGINEERED FILL TYPICAL UP-CANYON PROFILE DETAIL 9 ADVANCED GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTIONS REMOVAL ADJACENT TO EXISTING FILL NTS (11)- LEGEND B-1 ~ \J CPT -1 ---- afu/Qal Qop A' t DRIVEWAY 'A' SEE SHEETS 7 & APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF BORING (GEOCON 2004) DENOTES APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF CPT (THIS STUDY) APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF GEOLOGICAL CONTACT ARTIFICIAL FILL, UNDOCUMENTED OLD PARRALIC DEPOSITS (BRACKETED WHERE BURIED) (CS-CLAYSTONE SUBUNIT) (SS-SANDSTONE SUBUNIT) DENOTES APPROXIMATE ELEVATION OF GROUNDWATER CROSS-SECTION LOCATION CONSTRUC~ON NOTES CD CONSTRUCT 6" CURB PER SDRSD G-1. (!} CONSTRUCT 6" CURB & GUTTER PER SDRSD G-2 TYPE 'G'. CD CONCRETE HARDSCAPE PER SDRSD G-7. FINISH PER LANDSCAPE PLANS. 0 PERVIOUS PAVERS PER DETAIL 1 ON SHEET 3. ~ ® GRASS PAVERS PER DETAIL 2 ON SHEET 3. ~ ® BIORETENTION AREA PER DETAIL 3 ON SHEET 3 WITH OURET ~ S1RUClURE PER DETAIL 4 ON SHEET 3. - (j) FLOW-THROUGH PLANTER AREA PER LANDSCAPE PLANS AND DETAIL 5 ON SHEET 3. ® PERIMETER RETAINING WALL PER SHEETS 15-17. ®WATER FEATIJRE PER SEPARATE PLANS. @ WALL PER SEPARATE PLANS. @ ELEVATOR PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. B-9 0.0' -6.0' T.D.-6.0' NW B-5 0.0' -14.0' afu/Qal 14.0' -14.5' Qop @ 1 0.5' T.D.-19.5' B-10 0.0' -24.0' afu/Qal 0.0' Qop 7.0' . 31 .0' / \ @ 4 GF-33.5 FF=45.0 -- CPT-1 o.o' -36.o' 24.0' -30.0' Qop @ 7.0' T.D.-37.0' _____ .......... CPT-2 0.0' -27 .0' af 27.0'-28.0' Qop @ 6.0' T.D.-28.0' B-8 0.0'-28.0' afu/Oal 28.0' -41 .0' Qop @ 8.0' T.D.-41.0' ® 2 GF-33.5 FF-45.0 (1 FF-21.66 SF-33.0 -------- (14) -. ~r""'f. .. \,.,..l uu \2} FF=21.66 SF-33.0 I e B-6 0.0' -8.0' cffu/Qal 8.0' -15.75'e Qop @ 11.5' G T.D.-15.75' e @ -- Qop I / B-7 0.0'-24.0' afu/Qal 24.0' -30.5' Qop' @ 11.5' T.D.-30.5' FF-21.66 SF 33.0 T.D.-53.0' Qop GF=33.5 FF-45.0 / 0 -~"--:~:: ~ ' ·----.. ',/·· ',';>~ ,' G S ADVANCED GEOTECHNICAL SOlUTIONS, 97Q7Wap1~:; Srrcet. Suire 15C San Diego, California 921::'.1 Telephone: (619) 708-1549 Fa."' (714) 409-3187 E o_ Project: P/W 1205-QS REPORT: 1205-06-B-3 ~ r-------------------~----------------to ''AS BUlL T" P.E. __ _ EXP. ____ _ DATE G Q_ I "" 0 I " "' ~ r-------------------------------------t~ REVIEWED BY: 0 <( (COMPOSITE PLAN FROM SHEETS 5 & 6) INSPECTOR DATE ~ ~~-=====~===================:==~==~~==~=~~~s~H6E~n~~~C~I~T~Y~O~F=C~A~R~LS~B~AD~~~~S~~ ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ~ PRECISE GRADING PLAN FOR: OCEAN STREET RESIDENCES llf tri5''Sitii~~·.· i' . ffiethttfc t'i '&~··j t'')f:{#f7"ff'ffit'5 ffif'i"1-'"' e· ffN"'f' 9 &tert£Wti "'""·-pp m ' . t ="·-~-~""'@·-' .. ~·' ,_ --,.-··<'.':iU":+'W...=:-pf.Wfowlffiu/·:""""~'--~-·::~,o:--. ,_, $: i':!;>zi'~"~;c~';j<o-... , __ ,.__ $ er SCAL£' 1"=20' (H&V) P/L I fl -"" 20 I ----i , . ? . ~ . : -L GRAD[ -. -···-···- I 10 . .. . -I · 10 I 0~ u .i"s:: ... : ? ¥-----1 ·r--:-l ~? i "'T11i::L-d:'TY.rt ---........ .:10 Clop -10 .! ........ ····.····~ -cross. SECTio .• ·• N ,h.·· . . . I • I : j I .. ... .. ..... . : ., I I I I F ·2o r EXIST. GRADE 20 F' •---~-~---·-·-~·--~·---4&-·-I I ;t:~;--1 t-. -··~ ~i~--,==·~~-+····-4fl-······-··---·+---·-~-----·--i I 0 1 Clop I 0 -10 l l -10 CROSS SECTION FF' a.. ~~G s ADVANCEDGEDTEOINICAL SOLUfiONS, INC. · ~ 9707 Waples S~~ Suite 150 . San Diego, Califomia 92121 '\! . Telephone: (619) 70!1-1649 Fax: (714) 409-3287 PLA TE 2 I Project: P /W 1205-Q6 REPORT: 1205-QS-8-3 l I --~8 ~-·--·--"--··---~ ... !!~~'-f!Jt_q_fi~[JE ----~~-~ T~--~----t-···----·------"~----"····-····-·--·l---------~ I l I 1 I 30 f~ _::_::_::_ 1=-=.:-e=ffil--· _-_--t_Cf-_-__ -7:------------NEW BUILDING _ _ I . ··-:· .. ,? ? ...... :~ ...... I~ -aol> ' ' ' . . -~----·-~--c-------c ___________ J B-9 /OE:SIGN GRAfE I 30 10 ~--t--~~~-erop--, -=~-c---l __ .L ___ c ______ l ;A!ST.-GRA~~ I -;'&. J ; . aiuJQa~ to L::=~-:~~ .. - -.• ~ -~ _1 -ill ' ,-- I 1---~ I I / I l I NEW BUILDING I' I I I c N-/---J --, t-._ I 30 , , , c n:=L_ ________________ :-,---------- 1 ~DESIGN GRADE I L- I 10 -10 '"" + " "" I ········--······-·······'······· I -:I : 11==1 I ? ·.· I . ....._ I . I I I ' / ... ,. --~-?~ -fU Qop L?-- i -- 1 - 1 I N£1/lj BUILDING I c· " r--·~-!i2:!liL .. ~-j l ( OESIGN GRADE t 30 . fj'{J/L!Jl?{(:/ .. ' I WALL .... " -----~------,-------------, E~S; GRAO£ =mr==-,~---L-------=--=---L--=--=----------------------~ I ' I . ----. . I I I 10 I .. · · · I Qop ~ 'I .. --··· • +--~ -. ~-...--, - - --~-afu/Qal 1 ?"' '. . . ? ! ~Jr;? ----?---~ ?'--~ .. -----+-~ ·i>.UTI'YI!l'l·"'·'"'""'' 'T~:~: i -10 CROSS SECTION CC' a'· ~it\G s ADVANCED GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC. •· 9707 Waples Street. Suite 150 , San Diego. California 92121 •· · Telephone: (619) 708-1649 Fax: (714) 409-3287 SCAL£· 1"=20' {H&V} PLA TE 3 I Project: P /W 1205-QS 1 REPORT: 1205-QS-B-3 -----------------------------------------------------------------_.;""""""'"""'"''illi' ""'"'',;;;;'"~..1.''b''1'"""'"'' 'Cii"':ilo~i:lliEiiil!31~H~Y~,.....,;:~~:.·,<~<~-~'"'"'~""~~~~~ ...... ,,,;,t.c;,_~~~··"'~~~w...:: ... ;.,,, ___ " ·-·""' -~""""""'.,.,_,~, --------------------~ l7 NE' ~ 8-1 BUILDING I / D ll ____________ _;--·· · · · r .. .. -_______ t __ ~ RS~J~t~--~ jr·-----r-_____i_ __ ___Jjll l IJ' ~ rv£w BUil,DING Q ' _ ....... __ -------=-F-=~-~=--:-_ ----------1 B-6 ' ----rqEs/GN GRADE i I aM <•~r 1 ------------+----------------i Oop 1 . ' · -----"-] -...,,...--...,--EXIST. GRAD£ 1 II ' L __ cfif_,_J---------t I cRbss sECTION ~o·~ aop [ l "s-~ ~a;t;-a; -!l-=t i T. i ?~~ I ~ :.,11~1;~ '. ? ? ; ''' ' ' ' ' TIT -r:-? ---r-----1 -3( I 10 -10 I -10 ~ I ~ ~ ! I Nn / BUJU)(NG E·· IB-2 ·E·' ---~ -- _""" __ , ~---' 10 -10 !"----- Qop (SS) , ......... eop (cs) t-+-Qop 1 ~ (ss) ~lc~~l-±=======:::::::::--~-}--==----~-~-~------1------------~-.... 7-v WAU Qap CROSS SIECTION EE' ~--m·•-m• _. ·~?~~-. ·~ : . ----.:~ ~ 10 -10 ~AG S ADVANCED GEOHCHNICAL SOUJilONS, ~C. 9707 \Vaples Str«t. Suite 150 San Diego. California 9.2121 Telephone: (619) 708-1649 Fu: i7141409-3l87 SCALE· 1 "=20' (H&V} PLATE 4 Project: P/W 1205-os REPORT: 1205-os-B-3 ~ «'~ ~ CITY OF CARLSBAD CERTIFICATION OF SCHOOL FEES PAID B-34 Development Services Building Department 1635 Faraday Avenue 760-602-2719 www .carlsbadca.gov This form must be completed by the City, the applicant, and the appropriate school districts and returned to the City prior to issuing a building permit. The City will not issue any building permit without a completed school fee form. Project Name OCEANS ST. CONDOS Project 10: CT/MS: CT05-12 Building Permit P~nCheckNumbe~ ~P~C~1=3~4~0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Project Address: 2303,2305,2309, 2311, 2315, 2317, 2321, 2323, 2327, 2329,2333, 2335, 2339, 2341,2345,2347,2349,2351,2355,2357,2359,2363,2365,2367,2369,2373, 2375, 2377, 2379, 2383, 2385, 2387, 2389, 2393, 2395, Ocean St. A.P.N _.2io.loO'-l03w-O.u1.Jot0-..~-1~2-ll-o~o ___________________ _ Project Applicant (Owner Name): Ocean Street 8 Owners. LLC Project Description: 35 residential condominiums Building Type _....,R .... e.,.s..,.jd .... e.,...n.loiJtja...,l'------------------------- Residential: 35 NEW DWELLING UNIT(S) 82,015 Square Feet of Living Area in New Dwelling/s Second Dwelling Unit: Square Feet of Living Area in SOU Residential Additions: Net Square Feet New Area Commercial/Industrial: Net Square Feet New Area City Certification of Applicant Information: ...... r. .... Gt.rtRE-..-....zA::Lili.Aomololl4r _____________ --&.,Du:<awte:A....LL09w.lu..O!IJ6ru/2:.~.0u1~3L....-__ _ SCHOOL DISTRICTS WITHIN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD [gl Carlsbad Unified School District 0 VIsta Unified School District 0 San Marcos Unified School District 6225 El Camino Real 1234 Arcadia Drive 255 Pico Ave Ste. 100 Carlsbad CA 92009 (760-331-5000) Vista CA 92083 (760-726-2170) San Marcos, CA 92069 (760-290-2649) Contact: Nancy Dolce (By Appt. Only) U Encinitas Union School District 101 South Rancho Santa Fe Rd Encinitas, CA 92024 (760-944-4300 x1166) p_ San Diegulto Union High School District-By Appointment Only 684 Requeza Dr. Encinitas, CA 92024 (760-753-6491 X 5514) Certification of Applicant/Owners. The person executing this declaration ("Owner") certifies under penalty of pe~ury that (1) the information provided above is correct and true to the best of the Owner's knowledge, and that the Owner will file an amended certification of payment and pay the additional fee if Owner requests an increase in the number of dwelling units or square footage after the building permit is issued or if the initial determination of units or square footage is found to be incorrect, and that (2) the Owner is the owner/developer of the above described project(s), or that the person executing this declaration is authorized to sign on behalf of the Owner. Signature: /2,./(; ·13 B-34 Page 1 of2 Rev. 03/09 SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL FEE CERTIFICATION (To be completed by the school district(s)) *************************************************************************************************** THIS FORM INDICATES THAT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROJECT HAVE BEEN OR WILL BE SATISFIED. SCHOOL DISTRICT: The undersigned, being duly authorized by the applicable School District, certifies that the developer, builder, or owner has satisfied the obligation for school facilities. This is to certify that the applicant listed on page 1 has paid all amounts or completed other applicable school mitigation determined by the School District. The City may issue building permits for this project. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICIAL TITLE NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT DATE PHONE NUMBER B-34 Page 2 of2 Rev. 03/09 «~ ~ CITY OF CARLSBAD CERTIFICATION OF SCHOOL FEES PAID B-34 Development Services Building Department 1635 Faraday Avenue 760-602-2719 www.carlsbadca.gov This form must be completed by the City, the applicant, and the appropriate school districts and returned to the City prior to issuing a building permit. The City will not issue any building permit without a completed school fee form. Project Name OCEANS ST. CONDOS Project ID: CT/MS: CT05-12 Building Permit Plan Check Number: ...:.P_.;:C:;..:1=3....;::-3=0'------------------------ Project Address: 2353 Ocean St. A.P.N _,2....,0..,.3"""'-0._.1 ..... 0-_,1....,2-_,.0..,.0 ___________________ _ Project Applicant (Owner Name): Oceans Street 8 Owners. LLC Project Description: clubhouse/gym for condo complex Building Type ......looiC~oA.I.m.u.mwe..,.r..wc:uoiau.l _______________________ _ Residential: NEW DWELLING UNIT(S) Square Feet of Living Area in New Dwelling/s Second Dwelling Unit: Square Feet of Living Area in SDU ----------~------------------ Residential Additions: Net Square Feet New Area -----~------------------------ Commercial/Industrial: 2,010 Net Square Feet New Area City Certification of Applicant Information: .... r.~a..n .......... eJ;-.z;A,..l..,m~r---------------"'D""awte.....,.0,..,91 ... 0..,.6....,/2..,0L.I1 .... 3..._ __ __ SCHOOL DISTRICTS WITHIN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD 1Zl Carlsbad Unified School District 6225 El Camino Real Carlsbad CA 92009 (760-331-5000) D Encinitas Union School District 101 South Rancho Santa Fe Rd Encinitas, CA 92024 (760-944-4300 x1166) D Vista Unified School District 1234 Arcadia Drive Vista CA 92083 (760-726-2170) D San Marcos Unified School District 255 Pico Ave Ste. 100 San Marcos, CA 92069 (760-290-2649) Contact: Nancy Dolce (By Appt. Only) U San Dieguito Union High School District-By Appointment Only 684 Requeza Dr. Encinitas, CA 92024 (760-753-6491 X 5514) Certification of Applicant/Owners. The person executing this declaration ("Owner") certifies under penalty of perjury that (1) the information provided above is correct and true to the best of the Owner's knowledge, and that the Owner will file an amended certification of payment and pay the additional fee if Owner requests an increase in the number of dwelling units or square footage after the building permit is issued or if the initial determination of units or square footage is found to be incorrect, and that {2) the Owner is the owner/developer of the above described project(s}, or that the person executing this declaration is authorized to sign on behalf of the Owner. SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL FEE CERTIFICATION Signature'~~ Date' (.,ii. tb •13 B-34 Page 1 of2 Rev. 03/09 ''c'CCCJl<~'----------lliiiiiliiioio----------------- (To be completed by the school district(s)) *************************************************************************************************** THIS FORM INDICATES THAT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROJECT HAVE BEEN OR WILL BE SATISFIED. SCHOOL DISTRICT: The undersigned, being duly authorized by the applicable School District, certifies that the developer, builder, or owner has satisfied the obligation for school facilities. This is to certify that the applicant listed on page 1 has paid all amounts or completed other applicable school mitigation determined by the School District. The City may issue building permits for this project. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICIAL TITLE NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT DATE PHONE NUMBER B-34 Page 2 of2 6225 a CAMINO REAL CARLSBAD, CA 92009 Rev. 03/09 \ OCEAN STREET RESIDENCES May 2, 2013 AREA CALCULATIONS BLDG TYPE UNIT# FLOOR UNIT UNIT NET UNIT GROSS COMMON*, PATIO/DECK I LOCATION AREA AREA AREA i AREA 1 2STORY 1 1ST -2,376 2,504 r 416 186.· 2 2ND -2,431 2,560/ 128 179 2 2STORY 3 1ST -2,435 2,568/ 309 382 4 2ND -2,431 2,560/ 128 277* 3 2STORY 5 1ST -2,376 2,504......-416 459 6 2ND -2,431 2,560..-"' 128 234** 4 2STORY 7 1ST -2,602 2,736/ 309 298 8 2ND -2,431 2,560,.. 128 277* 5 2STORY 9 1ST -2,602 2,736/ 309 511 10 2ND -2,431 2,561/ 128 277* 6 2STORY 11 1ST -2,702 2,836r 309 529 12 2ND -2,627 2,756 .,..-128 192*** 7 2STORY 13 1ST -2,697 2,841/ 300 479 14 2ND -2,554 2,687 /, 128 243**** 8 2STORY 15 1ST LEFT 2,092 2,199,.-419t 16 1ST RIGHT 2,054 2,159/ 478 340tt 17 2ND LEFT 1,985 2,075/ 193ttt 18 2ND RIGHT 2,002 2,094/ 266 204tttt 9 2STORY CH 1ST LEFT 1,883 2,010/ CH 19 1ST RIGHT 1,827 1,936 ~ 385 238 20 2ND LEFT 1,897 1,999/ 159 21 2ND RIGHT 1,834 1,932 / 166 159 10 2STORY 22 1ST LEFT 1,787 1,905/ 238 23 1ST RIGHT 1,827 r--1,93V' 396 238 24 2ND LEFT 1,806 1,905 / 159 25 2ND RIGHT 1,834 1,932/ 166 159 11 2STORY 26 1ST LEFT 2,020 2,141 .v' 238 27 1ST RIGHT 2,060 2,173 ..... 396 238 28 2ND LEFT 2,036 2,141 / 159 29 2ND RIGHT 2,063 2,168 / 166 159 12 2STORY 30 1ST LEFT 2,020 2,141 ;t 238 31 1ST RIGHT 1,827 -1,936 396 238 32 2ND LEFT 2,036 2,141 / 159 33 2ND RIGHT 1,834 1,932/ 166 159 13 2STORY 34 1ST** -2,107 2,256/ 499 35 2ND -~ ~ 77 TOTAL UNIT AREAS I 77,784) ( 82,015) ~ ·-.. TOTAL GROSS BUILDING AREA ' -rr .... t "J.: iJ?jf~ 88,260 Notes: *Common Area includes building areas separate from units--elevators, elevator rooms, stairs, storage rooms and covered entries. Elevators are included at each floor. Stairs are included with the first floor plan. ** Bldg. 13 entry for the 1st floor unit is on 2nd floor. Unit net area is to interior finish. Unit gross area includes exterior walls. Patio/balcony areas are not included in area calculations. 9/3/2013 I z 83 "' z z Q ;2 "' w > !;i w "' ,.00 1•,00 ~ 1"l ~ '~/ .q z / ' L ' ;; I ' :5 ,, ' 0 I I J CL I / w I- (/) , __ .,,.,.....,i!jlliiOIWJ~IIIiilii\saa-·-ey ..,....,,............,_~-~-·-,...._~~------~ '~~C~~··"'"'' ',<4·••~·~-----------..... "'""~-' PC130030 2303 OCEAN ST OCEAN ST. CONDOS: DEMO EXIST. 50 APrS/Rllll n ~" r01\lrv->lll'"' '""' o 9f:r f'CI300~ fc(. (f;K pi~. sw)u-<~~soa.t I ocv 'I/ ;;o /t3 ~ 7l> P 1/I?J / [}..;t7.-0 I<E ..,_[;sGt L w /~Wee~ ,. tlr=f .C 2) 5{ IS /t'?:>-CAI'f \.-J 6~ w/docs. Sjn}t3 ~ -/::iJ ~ b(z.o/;3 -~ Pf/trJ/ E/JG-+ 5&rL-w/ :7tJ,'/s 1 s.frucl (z) ~1~:-ffl;::; ,:Jf~ -a:::. ~.~eel' 7/S/13 e'SC:rlL.-~ I ills /1?:> vr''"'r!C (!_ GovV---. 1/zHI''>-~ w;~ -t.;,&tl )~ , 1.-" f ~ ar h 'P/ ,rr,J / cJryliL "'Y{Z(cs €3.~ coJ;;,-JL~ ~Cr-IL c._~ 6(Z{b-~11-f or -ld~ ~ 6~ t-~lrr~ (Jrry1C@._ bacK. ' I f( JRI o W-<fY'0. ~ st ~ J 1Mk d-/5/J'+ ex1'~ l~ ~ ~\2ill•'f ~r~<>(r~-I~(J) Aflproyed ·~ .../ ... Date By BUILDING II) ~ Y/17 12 PLANNING v ·~c:? lrQ. ENGINEERING .;! f '2-<!.t I I cf /Vnl- FIRE Expedite? Y N ~12.1'olt3 b/Z. AFS Checked by: HazMat APCD Health FormsjFees Sent Rec'd Due7 By Encina y N Fire y N HazHealthAPCD y N PE&M I ~ y N School _Cft. Cl/tfl~ J-/ZS//Y' y N Sewer ( y N Stormwater y N Special lnspes!!on y N CFD: y 'LV landUse: Density: lmpArea: FY: Annex: Factor: ':::\ PFF: ( Y} N Comments Date Date Date Date Building 5/17(~ '(/~/(3 ~ 1!(~ l3 Planning 5}t7/!~ }fz.-F~3 g{l t::S Engineering 'S(t){i3 7/JJ/ L:) Fire I Need? EN £&9-u ~v<£1-. ./fj'yr L!t'rt{ JQ.bone a ~d.i aoo~ kfa.r l ~ lo.{) ~ A-.... vvne C.\ f:d L nifl]_ A none ODone [J Done a Done City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 04-14-2015 Plan Check Revision Permit No:PCR15021 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 Job Address: Permit Type: Parcel No: 2353 OCEAN ST CBAD PCR Lot#: 0 Valuation: 0000000000 $0.00 Construction Type: 58 Reference #: PC#: Project Title: Applicant: JIM MCMENAMIN 858-705-0242 OCEAN ST. CONDOS: 2,027 SF BUILD OUT FITNESS CENTER Plan Check Revision Fee Fire Expedited Plan Review Additional Fees Owner: Total Fees: $376.25 Total Payments To Date: Status: Applied: Entered By: Plan Approved: Issued: Inspect Area: $376.25 $0.00 $0.00 $376.25 Balance Due: FINAL APPROVAL Inspector: Date: Clearance: ISSUED 03/20/2015 JMA 04/14/2015 04/14/2015 $0.00 NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "Imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as 'fees/exactions." You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project. NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which vou have oreviouslv been aiven a NOTICE similar to this or as to which the statute of limitations has oreviouslv otherwise exoired. ~OWING APPROVALS REQUIRED DRivl{ TO PERMIT ISSUANCE: c:tz ts-.. ef-t 0PLANNING 0ENGINEERING 0BUILDING DFIRE DHEALTH DHAZMAT/APCD '._,_,,.,_,. {'city of Building Permit Application L'n 1...---I-Plan Check No. ~ ...... , ...., v 1 [v 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008 Est. Value Carls Dad Ph: 760-602-2719 Fax: 760-602-8558 Plan Ck. Depoplt email: building@carlsbadca.gov www.carlsbadca.gov Date~/(() /1 S' ISWPPP JOB ADDRESS ~853 ~ ST--SUITEt/SPACEt/UNITI IAPN - -- CT/PROJECT # rOT# I PHASE# rOFUNITS #BEDROOMS #BATHROOMS I TENANT BUSINESS NAME I CONSTR. TYPE I occ. GROUP DESCRIPTION OF WORK: Include Squa111 Feet of All'ected Anla(s) ~ Bu/t tJ/ blhf-f:?'fvUJ ,A I fl).Z1 s f EXISTING USE GARAGE (SF) FIREPLACE I PROPOSED USE PATIOS (SF) I DECKS (SF) YESO lAIR CONDITIONING I FIRE SPRINKLERS NcQ vEsONoD vEsONoO APPLICANT NAME ...J.'rn !hc.Yilwam\~ PROPERTY OWNER Primary Contact ADDRESS ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CITY STATE ZIP PHONE,.. -7j >S CJ'2.tl ~ PHONE I FAX <l~ cr... D .., EMAIL ' \\ rf\~~UYtoarhvu~ ·Ct. EMAIL lff\ DESIGN PROFESSION~ I 1 CONTRACTOR BUS. NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CITY STATE ZIP PHONE I FAX PHONE I FAX EMAIL EMAIL I STATE LIC. # STATE LIC.# ICL.ASS I CITY BUS. LIC.# (Sec. 7031.5 Busmess and Professions Code: Any City or County which reqUires a perm1t to construct, alter, 1m prove, demolish or repatr any structure, pnor to 1ts ISSuance, also reqUires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law !Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or that he is exemP.t therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars ($500)). WORKERS' COMPENSATION Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby aflinn under penalty of petjury one of the following declaflltions: B I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self·insura for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permn is issued. I have and will maintain worlters' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the perfonnance of the work for which this oermn is issued. My workers' compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Insurance Co. Policy No. Expiration Date--------- ~section need not be completed K the permn is for one hundred dollars ($100) or less. U Certificate ofExamption: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permn is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of CaiKomia. WARNING: Fallura to secura workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an amployar to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundrad thousand dollars (&100,000), In addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, lnterast and attorney's fees. 65 CONTRACTOR SIGNATURE 0AGENT DATE OWNER-BUILDER DECLARATION I hereby affl1111 that I am exempt from Contractor's Ucanse Law for the following reason: D D D I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contracto(s License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himse~ or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contracto(s License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contracto(s License Law). I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason: 1. I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. DYes 0No 2. I (have I have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. 3. I have contracted wnh the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name address I phone I contractors' license number): 4. I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name I address I phone I contractors' license number): 5. I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name I address I phone I type of work): 65 PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE 0AGENT DATE I certify that I have llllld the application and statethattheabolle information lsconactandthatthe lnfi:mnation on the plans lsacanate.l &gnle1Dcomplywlth all Cltyodnances and S1a1e laws l8latlng1D bulldlngcons1JUction. I hereby aulhorize represenlative of the City of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property tJr inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL UABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA perml is requied for excavations over 5'0' deep and demolitiJn or constructkln of s1ructures over 3 stories in hei;jht. EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the Building Ofli:ial under the provisions of this Code shall expire by linlilation and become null and wk! W the building or 'Milk aulhorized by such permK is not commenced -Mthin 180 days from the dale of such permK or if the building or a authorized by such permK is suspended or abandoned at any time after the v.ork is commenced tJr a period of 180 days (Sectkln 106.4.4 Uniform Building Code) . .8$ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE STOP: THIS SECTION NOT REQUIRED FOR BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE. Complete the following ONLY if a Certificate of Occupancy will be requested at final inspection. Fax (760) 602-8560, Email building@carlsbadca.govor Mail the completed form to CKy of Carlsbad, Building Division 1635 Faraday Avenue, Csrlsbad, California 92008. DELIVERY OPTIONS PICK UP: CONTACT (Listed above) CONTRACTOR (On Pg. 1) MAIL TO: CONTACT (Listed above) CONTRACTOR (On Pg. 1) OCCUPANT (Listed above) OCCUPANT (Listed above) MAIL/ FAX TO OTHER:---------------- ,65 APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE (Office Use Only) Carlsbad CA ASSOCIATEDCB#•----------- NO CHANGE IN USE/ NO CONSTRUCTION CHANGE OF USE/ NO CONSTRUCTION DATE DAHLIN groue February 27, 2015 Building Department City of Carlsbad Carlsbad, CA RE: Ocean Street Residences Delta D -Owner Revisions-Fitness Room A3.9a Revised Fitness Room Layout. Urinal added to Men's Restroom at Fitness Center. Floor drains added to Men's and Women's Restrooms. Dimensions at Men's and Women's Restrooms revised. Revised accessibility keynote BB and added accessibility keynote callouts. A3.9c A7.1 Ml.O M2.7 El.5 E2.6 Sincerely, Revised Fitness Room Reflected Ceiling Plan. Revised ceilings at stairs/entry to remove dropped soffit. Added strip vents at exterior entry of lower level reflected ceiling plan. Removed soffits at Office I Optional Bedroom 3 at upper level. Added door type P and door number 500. Revised door 201 & 217. Added Door Schedule Notes. Revised mechanical sheet index Added sheet M-2.7 HVAC Plans Fitness Center Revised Panel G Revised Fitness Room lighting and power plans Jonathan Shapero, AlA Architect 539 South Cedros Avenue + 1-858-350-0544 WWW.DAHLINGROUP.COM Solana Beach, California 92075 USA + 1-858-350-0540 fax EsGil Corporation In <Partnersfeip witfe government for (]Juiftfing Safety DATE: 03/30/2015 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: CB15-0743 p~ \SO~\ SET: II PROJECT ADDRESS: 2353 Ocean St. PROJECT NAME: Ocean St. Residences fitness room build out CJ APPLICANT CJ JURIS. CJ PLAN REVIEWER CJ FILE 0 The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's codes. ~ The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. 0 The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. D The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. D The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: EsGil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. EsGil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Jim McMenamin Telephone#: 858-705-0242 Date contacted: (by: ) Email: jim@zephyrpartners.com Mail Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS: Applicant to slip sheet all revisions to original plan set, Applicant to also slip sheet glass partition details to plans prior to issuing the permit By: John Le Vey EsGil Corporation 0 GA 0 EJ 0 MB 0 PC Enclosures: 03/23/2015 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858) 560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 .. Carlsbad CB 15-0743 03/30/2015 [DO NOT PAY-THIS IS NOT AN INVOICE] VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: CB15-0743 PREPARED BY: John LeVey BUILDING ADDRESS: 2353 Ocean St. BUILDING OCCUPANCY: BUILDING AREA Valuation PORTION (Sq. Ft.) Multiplier rev to fitness center Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE Jurisdiction Code cb By Ordinance Bldg. Permit Fee by Ordinance •I Plan Check Fee by Ordinance Type of Review: D Complete Review 0 Repetitive Fee 3Repeats • Based on hourly rate Comments: D Other 0 Hourly EsGil Fee DATE: 03/30/2015 Reg. VALUE Mod. D Structural Only t------3_.-'151 Hrs. @ • $86.00. Sheet of ($) $376.251 $301.001 macvalue.doc + ~ i EsGil Corporation In a'artnersliip witli t]ot~ernment for tBuiUina Safety DATE: 03/19/2015 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: CBlS-0743 {_PC!R IS C&')sET: I PROJECT ADDRESS: 2353 Ocean St. ~PPLICANT ~:URIS. r:J PLAN REVIEWER r:J FILE PROJECT NAME: Ocean St. Residences Bldg 9 TI D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's codes. D The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's D ~ D D codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: D EsGil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. ~ EsGil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Jim McMenamin Telephone#: 858-705-0242 ~ate COI)tacted:6 h "\ (b~ Email: jim@zephyrpartners.com ~ail "'Tr.!f~hon~ Fax In Person D REMARKS:.""' By: John LeVey EsGil Corporation 0 GA 0 EJ 0 MB 0 PC Enclosures: 03/12/2015 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858) 560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad CB15-0743 03/19/2015 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST TENANT IMPROVEMENTS PLAN CHECK NO.: CBlS-0743 OCCUPANCY: ? TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: ? ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA: SPRINKLERS?: ? REMARKS: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: 03/10/2015 DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED: 03/19/2015 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): JURISDICTION: Carlsbad USE:? ACTUALAREA: ? STORIES: ? HEIGHT: ? OCCUPANTLOAD:? DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 03/12/2015 PLAN REVIEWER: John Le Vey This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the California version of the International Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Code sections cited are based on the 2013 CBC, which adopts the 2012 IBC. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 105.4 of the 2012 International Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list {or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. Carlsbad CB15-0743 03/19/2015 Please make all corrections, as requested in the correction list. Submit FOUR new complete sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (THREE sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602- 2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 1. Please provide a copy of the construction value cost for the proposed work 2. Please provide a complete description of the work on the plans "Scope of Work" 3. Please clarify it appears this work is possibly a revision for an existing permit , if so provide the approved set of plans "complete" , if it is not and to a project that is completed please provide "complete" plans. I have nothing to compare the project to 4. Provide a Building Code Data Legend on the Title Sheet. Include the following code information for each building proposed: • Occupancy Classification(s) • For Mixed Occupancy Buildings, state whether the "nonseparated" or "separated" option was chosen from Sections 508.3/508.4. • Description of Use • Type of Construction • Sprin~e~:YesorNo • Stories • Height • Floor Area • Occupant Load • Justification to exceed allowable area in Table 503 (if applicable) • Justification to exceed allowable height or stories in Table 503 (if applicable) 4. Provide a statement on the Title Sheet of the plans, stating that this project shall comply with the 2013 California Building Code, which adopts the 2012 IBC, 2012 UMC, 2012 UPC and the 2011 NEC. Carlsbad CB15-0743 03/19/2015 5. For plans submitted for plan check 96'~~-~l(~~~;4, provide a Prescriptive or Performance energy design, demonstrating compliance with current 2013 energy efficiency standards. Information and Forms are available at: www.energy.ca.gov/title24/2013standards. • ELECTRICAL 6. Submit plan showing location of all panels. 7. Submit panels schedules. 8. Submit electrical load calculations. 9. Indicate existing main service size. 10. Indicate existing total main service load. 11. Indicate new additional loads. 12. Indicate wiring method, i.e. EMT, metal flex. 13. A GFCI protected receptacle outlet is required within 25 feet and on the same level as the mechanical equipment (heating, air-conditioning, and refrigeration equipment). Please include on the plans. NEC 210.63. • MECHANICAL 14. Show the location, type and size (BTU's) of all heating and cooling appliances or systems. 15. Provide mechanical plans, showing existing and proposed HVAC equipment, ducts and access to equipment. 16. Detail access and working clearances to HVAC equipment. 17. Detail ladder access to roof mounted HVAC equipment. 18. Detail disposal of main condensate drainage from air conditioning units. • PLUMBING 19. Per California law, additions or alternations of Commercial projects or Multifamily Residential projects (condos, apartments and hotels with kitchens) available for use before January 1, 1994 may require replacement of noncompliant plumbing fixtures*** by water conserving fixtures: Carlsbad CB15-0743 03/19/2015 • All plumbing fixtures in the building where an addition will increase the floor area of the building by 1 0%. (Or) • Plumbing fixtures that serve the alternations or improvement in which the building permit valuation exceeds $150,000.00. (Or) • An alternation or improvement to a room containing noncompliant fixtures (regardless of valuation). Please note on the plans the specific plumbing fixtures requiring replacement. *** "Noncompliant plumbing fixtures" are any of the following: • Any water closet exceeding 1.6 gallons/flush. • Any urinal manufactured to use more than 1.0 gallon/flush. • Any showerhead exceeding 2.5 gallon/minute. • Any interior faucet that emits more than a 2.2 gallons/minute. 20. Provide complete plumbing plans, including: a) Complete drain, waste and vent plans. b) Provide gas line plans and calculations, showing pipe lengths and gas demands. c) Provide complete water line sizing calculations, including the water pressure, pressure losses, water demands, and developed pipe lengths. d) Show water heater size, type and location on plans. 21. Show P & T valve on water heater and detail drain line route from P & T valve to the exterior. 22. Show 1/4" per 12" slope on drain and waste lines. To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, I calculation page, etc. i 1 Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a 1 result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: 0 Yes 0 No The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any Carlsbad CBlS-0743 03/19/2015 questions regarding these plan review items, please contact John Le Vey at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. ,, l I 'I I 1 I l ' .. · Carlsbad CB 15-0743 03/19/2015 [DO NOT PAY-THIS IS NOT AN INVOICE] VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: CB15-0743 PREPARED BY: John Le Vey BUILDING ADDRESS: 2353 Ocean St. BUILDING OCCUPANCY: BUILDING AREA Valuation PORTION (Sq. Ft.) Multiplier DATE: 03/19/2015 Reg. VALUE Mod. No billing at this time awaiting construction value cost Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE Jurisdiction Code #N/A Bldg. Permit Fee by Ordinance ... , Plan Check Fee by Ordinance 3 Type of Review: 0 Complete Review 0 Repetitive Fee 3Repeats Comments: *'':; lhr~~Jcir if\·~ 0 Other 0 Hourly EsGil Fee 0 Structural Only ~-------~IH' @ • ($) #NJAI #N!Al #N!Al Sheet of macvalue.doc + «~~' ~ CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DIVISION BUILDING PLAN CHECK APPROVAL P-29 Development Services Planning Division 1635 Faraday Avenue {760) 602-4610 www .carlc;badca .llov DATE: 3/26/15 PROJECT NAME: Ocean St. Residences PROJECT ID: CT 05-12 PLAN CHECK NO: PCR 15-021 SET#: 1 ADDRESS: 2303 Ocean St. APN: ~ This plan check review is complete and has been APPROVED by the Planning Division. By: Shannon Werneke A Final Inspection by the Division is required 0 Yes r8] No You may also have corrections from one or more of the divisions listed below. Approval from these divisions may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Resubmitted plans should include corrections from all divisions. D This plan check review is NOT COMPLETE. Items missing or incorrect are listed on the attached checklist. Please resubmit amended plans as required. Plan Check APPROVAL has been sent to: For questions or clarifications on the attached checklist please contact the following reviewer as marked: PLANfti'IIIIA 7so.6d2liiri D Chris Sexton 76()-602-4624 Chris.Sexton@carlsbadca.gov D Gina Ruiz 76()-602-4675 Gina.Ruiz@carlsbadca.gov Shannon Werneke 760-602-4621 Shannon.Werneke@carlsbadca.gov Remarks: None D Chris Glassen 760-602-2784 Christopher.Giassen@carlsbadca.gov D Val Ray Marshall 760-602-27 41 'i§!B9.Y.M§J~_I:!.9li@.qgr.§badca .gg_y D Linda Ontiveros 760-602-2773 L.lnda. Q.o..ti'l~!:Q~@carl!?ba.d.Ga_,gQY D Greg Ryan 760-602-4663 Gregory.Ryan@carlsbadca.gov D CindyWong 760-602-4662 D Dominic Fieri 760-602-4664 «~ ~ CITY OF CARLSBAD DATE: 03/26/2015 PLAN CHECK NO: 1 SET#: 1 PLAN CHECK REVIEW TRANSMITTAL PROJECT NAME: OCEAN ST CONDOS ADDRESS: '2303--0CEAN ST ;l.3S'..3 BUILDING DEPT. Co~'t Economic Development Department 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 www.carlsbadca.gov Pefl. t50~\ PROJECTID:C8169743 D This plan check review is complete and has been APPROVED by the FIRE Division. By:GR A Final Inspection by the FIRE Division is required 1:8:1 Yes D No ~ This plan check review is NOT COMPLETE. Items missing or incorrect are listed on the attached checklist. Please resubmit amended plans as required. Plan Check Comments have been sent to: JIM@ZEPHYRPARTNERS.COM You may also have corrections from one or more of the divisions listed below. Approval from these divisions may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Resubmitted plans should include corrections from all divisions. For questions or clarifications on the attached checklist please contact the following reviewer as marked: PLANNING ENGINEERING FIRE PREVENTION 760-602-4610 160-602-2750 7~ D Chris Sexton D Kathleen Lawrence ~ Greg Ryan 760-602-4624 760-602-27 41 760-602-4663 Chris.Sexton@carlsbadca.gov Kathleen.Lawrence@carlsbadca.gov Gregor:y.R)(an@carlsbadca.gov D Gina Ruiz D Linda Ontiveros D Cindy Wong 760-602-4675 760-602-2773 760-602-4662 Gina.Ruiz@carlsbadca.gov Linda.Ontiveros@carlsbadca.gov C)( nth ia. Wong@carlsbadca.gov D D D Dominic Fieri 760-602-4664 Dominic.Fieri@carlsbadca.gov Carlsbad Fire Department .Plan Review Date of Report: Name: Address: Permit#: Job Name: Job Address: Requirements Category: TI , COMM 03-28-2015 JIM MCMENAMIN 11750 SORRENTO VALLEY RD. SUITE 130 SAN DIEGO, CA 92121 CB150743 OCEAN ST. CONDOS: BUILD OUT 2353 OCEAN ST CBAD Reviewed by: ______..f/~~~- INCOMPLETE The item you have submitted for review is incomplete. At this time, this office cannot adequately conduct a review to determine compliance with the applicable codes and/or standards. Please review carefully all comments attached. Please resubmit the necessary plans and/or specifications, with changes "clouded", to this office for review and approval. Conditions: Cond: CON0008137 [NOT MET] Provide correct information for the following Items: Occupancy: ? Type Of Construction: ? Allowable Floor Area: ? Sprinklers?: ? Jurisdiction: Carlsbad Use:? Actual Area: ? Stories:? Height:? Occupant Load: ? Code sections cited are based on the 2013 CFC, which adopts the 2012 IFC. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 105.4 of the 2012 International Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. Be sure to enclose the list provided indicating the correction and sheet number when you submit the revised plans. ' · ·1. Please provide a complete description of the work on the plans "Scope of Work" [2. Please clarify it appears this work is possibly a revision for an existing permit , if soprovide the approved set of plans "complete" , if it is not and to a project that is completed please provide "complete" plans. 3. Provide a Building Code Data Legend on the Title Sheet. Include the following code information for each building proposed: • Occupancy Classification(s) • For Mixed Occupancy Buildings, state whether the "non-separated" or "separated" option was chosen from Sections 508.3/508.4. + Description of Use • Type of Construction • Sprinklers: Yes or No +Stories +Height • Floor Area + Occupant Load • Justification to exceed allowable area in Table 503 (if applicable) • Justification to exceed allowable height or stories in Table 503 (if applicable) 4. Provide a statement on the Title Sheet of the plans, stating that this project shall comply with the 2013 California Fire Code, which like the 2013 CBC adopts the 2012 IBC, 2012 UMC, 2012 UPC and the 2011 NEC. Entry: 03/28/2015 By: GR Action: CO ~;''''·'"'-""'--~'""-'••"""'--""""'""-~"~ (7 SITE PLAN ·oc~ 1\l.sl'J:> ·(~~)' J I 539 South Cedros Avenue SolanaBeach.CA92075 858-35()...()544 CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION 12-09 (CT 05-12, CP 05-11, CDP 05-28) ESN REVISIONS SITE PLAN SCALE: 1" = 20' JOB N0.1139.001 SHEET DRAWN CHECK A 1 .0 DATE 03·21-13 Janet Altar From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Jonathan and John- Janet Altar Friday, March 20, 2015 11:07 AM 'Jonathan Shapero'; Jim McMenamin Oim@zephyrpartners.com); 'mail@esgil.com' Will Foss OCEAN ST. CONDOS Per our conversations this morning the Fitness center build out and the Sales center build out will be handled as follows: CB150744-Sales Center-John LeVay will use as reference PC13-30. This will remain as a tenant Improvement. The permit for the condo will not final until this unit is returned to original condition. John-valuation is $16.245 for 375 sf of area improved. PCR15-21-(formerly CB150743)-Fitness center plans will be treated as a revision to the original building plans (PC13-30), sent to Esgil for reference. These will ultimately need to be slip sheeted into the City master set when the revision is issued. Let me know if I have missed anything. ]~Altzw Building Technician II (city of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Ave. Carlsbad, CA 92008 760-602-2717 www.carlsbadca.gov 1 KEY· D. H. =DOOR HEIGHT D.O.W. =DOOR OPENING WIDTH G. H. =GLASS HEIGHT D.L.H. =DAYLIGHT OPENING HEIGHT F.G.W. =FIXED GLASS WIDTH D.L.W. =DAYLIGHT OPENING WIDTH F.O.H. =FINISHED OPENING HEIGHT D.O.H. =DOOR OPENING HEIGHT F.O.W. =FINISHED OPENING WIDTH 2 F---------F.O.W. +-------+--1 F.G.W. --·~-,·--D.O.W. +--t----F.G.W. r---- ~~~~~~~~====+=~~~~~~~~-fiP I I I I I 3 I I I ~ I! ~ ~ f\ 4 I \ I 1~\ I ' I\ lL I\ • EXTERIOR ELEVATION ' ' \ ~ \ REFLECTED CEILING PLAN NOTES: AVALIABLE GLASS THICKNESS: 3/8, 112, 5/8 & 3/4 MAX HEIGHT: 1/2' TEMP. 108', 5/8' TEMP. 120' & 3/4' TEMP. 120' MAX DOOR WIDTH 42' 3 • F.O. • H. MAX DOOR WEIGHT 275 lbs The pull as shown is an option. Please consult Donna's Price Book for complete line of Housings, Handles and Locking Ladder Pulls. * OPENING CLEARANCES MAY VARY BASED ON SITE CONDITIONS. STANDARD CLEARANCES O,..:,.Fa~· .... LESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. ** PIVOT POINT CENTER LINE IS FROM FINISHED JAMB. t;.\1 1520 JabeZ Run Suite 303 Millersville, MD 21108 800.451.0849 TOLEIW!CES UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED: DECIMAL Xf.X: t .005 .XX =t .01 FRACTION t 1/16 DEGREEt3' (!) z ~ w w c::::.....J LL......J I-<( o3: >~ O.t-w~ 0::::0: :::> a. <( :2 0:::: 0 0 DRAWNBY: TS DATE: 07.29.13 SCALE: N.T.S. SHEET: 1 OF 5 DRAWING NO. PURE PIVOT FREE SWING 00 NOT SCALE DRAWING I •· f r KEY· D. H. =DOOR HEIGHT D.L.H. =DAYLIGHT OPENING HEIGHT D.L.W. =DAYLIGHT OPENING WIDTH D.O. H.= DOOR OPENING HEIGHT MIN. 2x4 WOOD BLOCKING REQ'D D.O.W. =DOOR OPENING WIDTH F.G.W. =FIXED GLASS WIDTH F.O.H. = FINISHED OPENING HEIGHT F.O.W. =FINISHED OPENING WIDTH BY OTHERS (TYP.) ----+t.._ PURE™ TOP CHANNEL PURE™ PIVOT PURE™ SWING FITTING INTERIOR PURE™ SWING FITTING PURE™ PIVOT (RECESS IN FLOOR) CDSECTION@ DOOR G. H. =GLASS HEIGHT ::i c::i #12 SCREWS@ 12" O.C. ALT. SIDES (BY OTHERS) :i d c:i EXTERIOR * OPENING CLEARANCES MAY VARY BASED ON SITE CONDITIONS. STANDARD CLEARANCES OF Ys' USED UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. ** PIVOT POINT CENTER LINE IS FROM FINISHED JAMB. ~ 1520 JabeZ Run Suite 303 Millersville, MD 21108 800.451 .0649 TOLERANCES UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED: DECIMAL 1JX • t .005 .XX • ± .01 FRACTION t 1116 DEGREE ±.3' DRAWNBY: TS DATE: 07.29.13 SCALE: N.T.S. SHEET: 2 OF 5 DRAWING NO. PURE PIVOT FREE SWING DO NOT SCALE DRAWING KEY· D. H. =DOOR HEIGHT D.O.W. =DOOR OPENING WIDTH D.L.H. =DAYLIGHT OPENING HEIGHT F.G.W. =FIXED GLASS WIDTH D.L.W. =DAYLIGHT OPENING WIDTH F.O.H. =FINISHED OPENING HEIGHT D.O. H. =DOOR OPENING HEIGHT F.O.W. =FINISHED OPENING WIDTH MIN. 2x4 WOOD BLOCKING REQ'D BY OTHERS (TYP.) --.....J....-.........., CEILING PURE™ 1" x 1-%" TOP CHANNEL ~"CLEAR TEMPERED GLASS INTERIOR 1" x 1" PURE™ BOTIOM CHANNEL #12 SCREWS@ 12" O.C. (BY OTHERS) G.H. = GLASS HEIGHT d _j ci . ....- #12 SCREWS@ 12" O.C. (BY OTHERS) ~ ~ EXTERIOR (!) z z w c.. 0 ®SECTION @FIXED PANEL *OPENING CLEARANCES MAY VARY BASED ON SITE CONDITIONS. STANDARD CLEARANCES OF Ys' USED UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. ** PIVOT POINT CENTER LINE IS FROM FINISHED JAMB. ~ 1520 JabeZ Run Suite 303 Millersville, MD 211 08 800.451.0849 TOLERANCES UNLESS OlliERWISE SPECIAEO: DECIMAL .XXX : t .005 .XX =t .01 FRACTION t 1/16 DEGREE t3' DRAWNBY: TS DATE: 07.29.13 SCALE: N.T.S. SHEET: 3 OF 5 DRAWING NO. PURE PIVOT FREE SWING DO NOT SCALE DRAWING KEY: D.H. =DOOR HEIGHT D.O.W. =DOOR OPENING WIDTH G.H. =GLASS HEIGHT D.LH. =DAYLIGHT OPENING HEIGHT F.G.W. =FIXED GLASS WIDTH D.L.W. =DAYLIGHT OPENING WIDTH F.O.H. =FINISHED OPENING HEIGHT D.O.H. =DOOR OPENING HEIGHT F.O.W. =FINISHED OPENING WIDTH : ,··: .. '( .. :.:"·. ·.~ .. ,'.·. ('' ·.··:~~ .... I t-Ya" G) FIXED PANEL@ WALL 1" x 1" PURE™ BOTIOM CHANNEL . ..- * OPENING CLEARANCES MAY VARY BASED ON SITE CONDITIONS. STANDARD CLEARANCES OF Ya' USED UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. ** PIVOT POINT CENTER LINE.IS FROM FINISHED JAMB. ~ DORMA 1520 JabeZ Run Suite 303 Millersville, MD 21108 800.451.0849 TOLERANCES UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIRED: DECIMAL :n.x = t .005 .XX = t .01 FRACTION t 1118 DEGREE t3' DRAWNBY: TS DATE: 07.29.13 SCALE: N.T.S. SHEET: 4 OF 5 DRAWING NO. PURE PIVOT FREE SWING DO NOT SCALE DRAWING " . I ,1 I' li ~ ~I i t :I !I I I ~ i I l !! KEY: D.H. = DOOR HEIGHT D.O.W. =DOOR OPENING WIDTH G.H. =GLASS HEIGHT D.L.H. =DAYLIGHT OPENING HEIGHT F.G.W. =FIXED GLASS WIDTH D.L.W. =DAYLIGHT OPENING WIDTH F.O.H. =FINISHED OPENING HEIGHT D.O.H. =DOOR OPENING HEIGHT F.O.W. =FINISHED OPENING WIDTH I ,.... ~ w ~ . ~ (.) r LL 1-LL 1'-'ll 0 LL 0 w ...J (!) 0 z 0 ~ ::?! u..-z s: j! ~ 0 L-w...J (!) ~w c:i =>cc z 0..-ex: ,.... 0:: :::::> (.) (.) (L_ t=o 0 0:: 0 0 0 (!) ~ z I L-3: en ~ ..q ...J w z j!! ~ w:x: ~u ;:::):::!: o..o ~1' ~~ ><o ;..cc *OPENING CLEARANCES MAY VARY BASED ON SITE CONDITIONS. STANDARD CLEARANCES OF Ya' USED UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. ** PIVOT POINT CENTER LINE IS FROM FINISHED JAMB. ~ 1520 JabeZ Run Suite 303 Millersville, MD 21108 800.451.0649 TOLERANCES UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIEO: DECIMAL .XXX=t.005 .XX =t.01 FRACTION t 1/16 DEGREE t.3' DRAWNBY: TS DATE: 07.29.13 SCALE: N.T.S. SHEET: 5 OF 5 DRAWING NO. PURE PIVOT FREE SWING DO NOT SCALE DRAWING