Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2304 FARADAY AVE; ; CB980527; PermitU4/U2/98 11:12 Page 1 of 1 B U I L D I N G P E R M I T Permit No: CB980527 Project No: A9800684 Development No: Job Address: 2304 FARADAY AV Permit Type: INDUSTRIAL TENANT Parcel No: 212-061-37-00 Valuation: 20,800 IMPROVEMENT Suite: Lot#: Occupancy Group: Reference#: Description: ADD 800 SF TO EXIST MEZZANINE : FOR OFFICE SPACE 760 5652 04/02/98 0001 Ol C-PRMT Construction Type: Status: Applied: Apr/Issue: Entered By: 931-1130 I ~INAL APP~OVAL- 1 fN.::,~ DATE# lCLEARANCE ___ ======- CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 02 1261 .. 00 NEW ISSUED 02/19/98 04/02/98 RMA PERMIT· APPLICATION CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad CA 92009 (760) 438-1161 EST. VAL. -+f::r-+-1.;..,:.::'-""';__--rt-r-'T Plan Ck. Deposit -----,,,......,,.--w.:,;,..,._ Vali,.SN:@dc~Y~.i ~~~~'d:B'-~a:.f:------'- Date 254-00 ,',, Legal Description Lot No. Subdivision Name/Number Unit No. Phase No. Total # of units Assessor's Parcel # Existing Use Proposed Use .,.2/.2& 4, 1370 0 Name Address City State/Zip Telephone # ·4, __ _ ,,, , ,' ,._ " :~ " ,< y ; :.-:. ', ,.,, Name City S.tate/Zip Telephone# '£1; .. -cor11fM9toi'I .: t::'OMP.ANY,:NAME . (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: An City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law [Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code] or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption., .l}ny violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars [$500]) • ..5~tJnJ/e LJ;,,r;r;y..c-f1a~ c;3<; &;r/4. i/.e(46g/p #$tJD 6r'/sb.d C,4-,'2ki9 <f'_j/~//sf lS Name Address City State/Zip Telephone # State License # ~...?,17-3 License Class /3 City Business License # /e,2 d ,< ..3 r6 tJ(/.o a.-d 9.,;t.oo ,y ~9'..:J. Designer Name State/Zip Telephone State License # / o/ :J, 7 7 '~: -WOfl!{~RS; COAAPEt,is'AftciN .. -· . . . ., ... -~. -· -: -;-~~--: .. ·., ,. .. .,; .. :::·~·~--_:-:_·: -:~: ::;.~::::.~.---::::,~.:.~ .-:·"' Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: D I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. J8(_ I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Insurance Company s~ 4.,zd Policy No,d.l)..'1--'f d: cv,,!f 0()/(.,W7 Expiration Date /-/--99 (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($100] OR LESS) D CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor' License Law for the following reason: 0 I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for. the purpose of sale). 0 I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). 0 I am exempt under Section ______ Business and Professions Code for this reason: 1. I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. D YES ONO 2. I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. 3. I have contracted _with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): 4. I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone numper / contractors license number):. _____________________________________________ _ 5. I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type of work):. __________________________________________ '---------------- Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? D YES D NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? 0 YES O NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? 0 YES O NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. '.if.~---~Q~~1'i%491:fq}r(!NPlNG.~¢tN§Y ... ·, _ · ,-, ___ . _________ ,· -: .. : :..:.-:..'.-~.-, _ :;;,. . , ... ?,:----0 - 1 hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097(i) Civil Code). I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the Cit~ of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the Building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 365 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the rk is commenced for a period of 180 days (Section 106.4.4 Uniform Building Code). DATE --=-tf2_.___,-('_7-'---__._7'..,._f __ _ PINK: Finance 04/02/98 11:08 Page 1 of 1 S E W E R P E R M I T Permit No: SE980035 Bldg PlanCk#: CB980527 Job Address: 2304 FARADAY AV Permit Type: SEWER -OFFICE/WAREHOUSE Parcel No: 212-061-37-00 Suite: 5652 04/02/98 0001 01 02 Description: ADD 800 SF TO EXIST MEZZANINE : FOR OFFICE SPACE Permitee: WHITE CONSTRUCTION 760 931-1130 6351 CORTE DEL ABETO STE A-100 CARLSBAD CA 92009 C-PRMT 12·.U • 00 Status: PENDING Applied: 03/05/98 Apr/Issue: Expired: Prepared By: DR ---~------==----~----------l FINAL APPR0VAL INSP.·-·-· DA1 ·-··· __ _ ·;CLEARANCE _____ _ l-~ CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 City of Carlsbad Inspection Request For: 1 /18/99 Permit# CB980527 Title: ADD 800 SF TO EXIST MEZZANINE Description: FOR OFFICE SPACE Type: ITI Sub Type: Job Address: 2304 FARADAY AV Suite: Lot Location: APPLICANT : WHITE CONSTRUCTION Owner: SIMPSON FAMILY TRUST 03-30-94 Remarks: EXTENSION 10 Total Time: CD Description 19 Final Structural 29 Final Plumbing 39 Final Electrical 49 Final Mechanical Inspector Assignment: TP --- Phone: 7609311130 Inspector: L Requested By: DEE Entered By: CHRISTINE Act Comments _/j_{!_ ________ _ ±-- * UNSCHEDirr,ED BWJ,DING INSPECTION DATE ___ ./+-M/4~f..-11/,,__·_ l l ri;l-INSPECTOR ........ ~--· _____ _ PERMIT# 1t-.£"2--'7 PLAN CHECK# ------ JOB ADDRESS Z 'so/,,/ ;e;g~Y.J~~ w.° DESCRIPTION _______________________ _ TIME ARRIVE: ____ _ CODE DESCRIPTION ACT CO:MMENTS /IJ /4;;"'/~~../-/~ /.F, x Pt-JIL-/ 4',,-~-~:,IA-.,,,rf /JM,,.f5 ,,fa;e~t u A/'l4,,:J: /2~-rvrL-,.._) v~r.Jtf-/L -z_~ ~t,lf_ t;~~/ t,,(,,,--,c/l,(44 /2~v,~ -/b J2..e.-~~~,4.,v/t-4-,/!'\./ e t-JJ"JvL ut:1t1£-j 12/02/98 . ' DATE 07/06/98 07/02/98 07/02/98 07/02/98 07/02/98 06/09/98 06/09/98 06/08/98 06/08/98 06/03/98 06/03/98 06/02/98 06/02/98 06/02/98 06/02/98 06/02/98 06/02/98 05/14/98 05/06/98 05/06/98 04/27/98 04/24/98 04/24/98 04/24/98 04/09/98 INSPECTION HISTORY LISTING FOR PERMIT# CB980527 INSPECTION TYPE INSP ACT COMMENTS Final Combo RI Interior Lath/Drywall TP Interior Lath/Drywall TP Final Combo TP Final Combo RI Final Combo RI Final Combo TP Final Combo RI Final Combo TP Rough Combo RI Rough Combo TP Frame/Steel/Bolting/We! TP Interior Lath/Drywall TP Rough/Topout TP Rough Electric TP Rough/Ducts/Dampers TP Rough Combo RI Interior Lath/Drywall TP Frame/Steel/Bolting/We! TP Rough Electric TP Frame/Steel/Bolting/Wel TP Shear Panels/HD's TP Frame/Steel/Bolting/We! TP Rough Combo TP Ftg/Foundation/Piers TP RI C/WHITE CONST/931-1130 PA 1 HR WALL@ ROOF PRINT AREA PA 1 HR WALLS TO ROOF OFFICE 2ND WC RI C/ RI C/DEBBIE/931-1130 EX 10 NR RI C/WHITE CONST/931-1130 NR 1 HR WALL NOT PER PLN RI C/VICKIE/931-1130 EX 10 NS SEE 6/2 AP T-BAR GRID 2ND FLR CO 1 HR WALL TO EXTND TO ROOF SHT WC AP CEIL LITES 2ND FLR AP DUCTS 2ND FLR RI C/VICKIE/931-1130 EX 10 AP AP SHR REV ATTCH AP AP 2ND FLR SHTING & SILL PLT NAIL CO SHR TRANS TJl, TIGHT BOLTS AP LEDGER BOLT ATTCHMNT WC AP LTR FOR DOWELS ATTCH HIT <RETURN> TO CONTINUE ••. FINAL BUILDING I~SPECTION DEPT: BUILDING ENGINEERING F~, PLANNING CMWD ST LITE PLAN CHECK#: CB980527 PERMIT#: CB980527 PROJECT NAME: ADD 800 SF TO EXIST MEZZANINE FOR OFFICE SPACE ADDRESS: 2304 FARADAY AV CONTACT PERSON/PHONE#: C/WHITE CONST/931-1130 SEWER DIST: CA WATER DIST: CA INSPECTEQ BY: {f'\, I\ A f INSPECTED BY: INSPECTED BY: COMMENTS: DATE INSPECTED: DATE INSPECTED: DATE INSPECTED: APPROVED APPROVED APPROVED DATE: 06/08/98 PERMIT TYPE: ITI { --: 1 ;-,=~--'r' -::--\ ,: ' '' , i , JUN .-8 1998 i . '} l' I / ! I I="" DISAPPROVED DISAPPROVED DISAPPROVED ~,. ~.' . ' CARL SCHMIDT · REGISTERED SPECIAL INSPECTOR 3880 Adams Street · Carlsbad. CA 92008 Phone (619) 729-9618 SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT:C..-P-~. ADDRESS: 2.. ~ c<-\ r'A-IR..-.-. OA"'i PERMIT NUMBER: 9a-os ~, PLAN FILE NUMBER: MATERIAL TYPE, GRADE, SOURCE: Inspection Date FILE: REPORT DATE: '-l-P-'f;-- Report Building Number Performed E-ip~.x.'t 'l'r:::.,\po...,--Inspection. Location and extent of work inspected include: . I.."sFc.,--tc_J__ >l("' d.r~U~J ho\e s fuv-epo;<,l ~A~-tc-\lc..:,-\-1~V\ ~----- -# L{ re-1o4,,,-. }-,k> J e... si 2--e-I .S 'it 11 X (_, '/ ~ f\ ~ ~-<::'..,V d_ (:_, +-c-. t \ \ \ A-/ A-t{ , Lo c:.dc," ..._ \,\.)A_ s ~{ 1 ':J ~,r i'Yl.<GU A-A (" .,__ , WORK INSPECTED CONFORMS WITH APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED Inspection performed by: Phil Porter ~·. Signature of Special Inspector } cc: 618 Certification # 3 CARL SCHMIDT REGISTERED SPECIAL INSPECTOR 3880 Adams Street Carlsbad, CA 92008 Phone (619) 855-9252 SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT: C.P.S. ADDRESS:<2304Faraaay~C-af[fb]g PERMIT NUMBER: 980527 EPOXY REBAR FILE: R8D16 REPORT DATE: 04/16/98 MATERIAL TYPE, GRADE, SOURCE: Grade 60 Rebar; Simpson Epoxy Tie, ICBO 4945. Inspection Date Report 04/08/98 Performed Epoxy Rebar Inspection. Location and extent of work inspected include: -Inspected thirty-eight drilled holes for epoxy installation for# 4 rebar. Hole size is 5/8" x 6-1/2" as per detail 11A/A4. Location: footing for mezzanine. -Holes were found to be clean prior to bolt installation. WORK INSPECTl;D CONFORMS WITH APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED Inspection performed by: Phil Porter s:::~ Signature of Special Inspector cc: • City of Carlsbad White Constr. P Porter File 618 Certification # . ! = \\ -- ~ = \}) i l i ! ·t • l I l 1 J ' 1 l ! l ! l t l l I I , / I I i • I ( I i ! . ' ~~2 ~ \)l \-\ ~ tt~ ~ ~~ ~: ~-t ('\ . f . ' "~ - ' . ' ' . . ' : I l . '•. ,,, I -----s---+----------------~----·-----r---· ! ! l ~ ~ t:: ~ } ,- (\\ (\ I -\ f~ -~~ ~J\ :~?-')(. )---~ 1\ ' -J! -r. :t: \1\\)1 • II~ ~ tJL -" . \'\ -· )-u ~t iJ ,, r ·. } .. )' \ . - \n"L {'\ -_,,,.,, •,,,. ~ ,.; ~~~ :_·_ \1\· \ ~,j ',. fl • I • • I ··,, (n;a \ -:::.· 2 l ; · .... · ·t,i ··7' ~ 2· · I l1 1 . I . '),: H rl ·. ~. ~ ._,. ,, =- -,oTµ,, O .L,. e., I HJ'l-. ~fZ-lZ-ll?D{L EJ .1~ 1. ·l I -I I. ~~-,;;. ·a, J -'I.--f/'TH Pf ·-:~ LT-t:.x1S1 1& 1 T~VE:.L-. , \ -· 14Jt!X l~·oX t°l~ O.l,. , e t.,oF,,F.,'f ~I S1 I ~ • ·---:--H •• .-1~! G0 x71J tJoofZ-Pflc>VCOEEP /--fflJ. fU!G'I;, NIPTH =-I/-$ 1' < 7z1t ~ µ11-1. µ6C WIPTH ·=" :z .t "< 36,, fLO.?(Z.. M-EA -flf2->T A--f2-. OfftC-lz. sr:- 4-,31(/Ioo ==43Y{ > 30 2 EXIT /2EQO. /1--frn.) i ~ . I l i /1ANl.,l~TU!UN<? -.! !., 2 #' • ""7!1 I' 7 ,.. .!::r: 1---- SF-/ . 7,151 /~c='3t:f.7t, '?3o 2 f'.Xti f<ES.D (~) ·:;oe,, ... --.,. . = -¥=*= ;1 / [_-. W~ou~E-6,4'1o¼bt1"' 12,fg <3o IS<tT~P i l t-··-······ I • -!, ' "CO" , ....... ·---"; c·;---;·:.1 S,Z.74 OL-. ~VIDW 4 1::¥11 '>,r-::': "-~ I . J._ .fLoo~ .Af2-E:.A -SECoND f-L.12-. EJ(ISTIN e, OFAC£. /-JESW OFF/CE-. 4480/ttH> = '3,62-o SF- /300 4,4-t}O ~F 44-,8-? 30 Zf=.XCT~fo. E-.'X«TINe, C§Cf-1~ 5 ; z ' .. I. EsGil Corporation 'l.n Partttersfiip witli (jovemment for 'lJuiufing Safe~ DATE: March 30, 19~8 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 98-527 · SET: Ill ~CANT ~ D PLAN REVIEWER 0 FILE PROJECT ADDRESS: 2304 Faraday Ave. PROJECT NAME: CPS PRINTING Addition: and TI [Z] D D . ~ D D ·D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and sho.u.l_d t?~ c:;orrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. -. -· .. -~ .·-·-.. ~ ··"4' The check list transmltt°ed .. l"\erewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corre~ted plans-are S!,Jl;>mitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: [Z] Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. 0 Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan chec~ has been completed. Person G.ontacted: Telephone#: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax#: e ep,one Fax In Person REMARKS: Applicant shall provide sheets E-1, E-2, M1 and M2. for two sets of plans to be completed as the set marked owner Ill. By: Sergio Azuela Esgil Corporation . D GA D CM D EJ D PC Enclosures: 3/23 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (619) 560-1468 + Fax (619)-560-1576 EsGH Corporation 'l.n Partnersliip Witli (jovemment for '.BuiUing Safetg DATE: March 18, 1998 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 98-527 SET: II PROJECT ADDRESS: 2304 Faraday Avenue PROJECT NAME: CPS PRINTING Addition and Tl D APPLICANT ;;-1::1 JURIS. D PLAN REVIEWER D FILE D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. D The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The· plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. i:g] The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. i:g] The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Steve White 6351 Corte del Abeta # A 100, Carlsbad, CA 92009 i:g] Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. D Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone#: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax#: Mail Telephone Fax In Person D REMARKS: By: Sergio Azuela Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA 0 CM 0 EJ 0 PC 3/10 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (619) 560-1468 + Fax (619) 560-1576 Carlsbad 98-527 II March 18, 1998 RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 2304 Faraday Avenue DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 3/10 REVIEWED BY: Sergio Azuela FOREWORD {PLEASE READ): PLAN CHECK NO.: 98-527 SET: II DATE RECHECK COMPLETED: March 18, 1998 This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. · The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and ·regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1994 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. A. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints to: Esgil Corp. or to the bldg. dept. of the juris. B. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. C. The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews. The original correction number has been given for your reference. In case you did not keep a copy of the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding corrections. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items. D. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? DYes DNo Carlsbad 98-527 II March 18, 1998 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92009, (619) 438-1161. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (619) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 6. The tenant space and new and/or existing facilities serving the remodeled area must be accessible to and functional for the physically disabled. ·see the attached correction sheet. Title ~4, Part 2. DEPARTMENT OF STATE ARCHITECT NON RESIDENTIAL TITLE 24 DISABLED ACCESS REQUIREMENTS • SANITARY FACILITIES • PLEASE CLARIFY IF THERE ARE EXISTING BATHROOMS ON THE SECOND FLOOR. NOTE THAT IF THERE ARE EXISTING BATHROOMS IN THE SECOND FLOOR THEY HAVE TO BE DISABLED ACCESSIBLE. 28. Original corrections 28 to 31 shall be rechecked. See original correction list. If you have any questions, please contact Sergio Azuela of Esgil Corporation at (619) 560-1468. Thank you. lt:J/1.l l'13 Pt>N Q-fEf:.11' * ''13 -.t:/68 SI!;: JI ---------~~~::::.!.......::~-~~____µr;;~~61L-) -fto <TY (,,,,:,-y-- ;-1,,,:t Sur ;,. ., , // l~~~----------------.J. @ Prr;e -< vf -Me ~./c...r Sho~.: Sf#Jri :) 6 / should (.(.Se. -Z8 I/ ..s s / 4-3..f-R. Bv.t_ S ..'.l. • / shoi.J.J .;:i...6 ~ S S' I 4 5 .C . f'J-ett-H:.... C / o ,,.;7 . EsGil Corporation 'l.n Partnersfiip witfi (jovemment for '13uiUing Safetg DATE: March 3, 1998 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 980527 SET: I PROJECT ADDRESS: 2304 Faraday Ave. PROJECT NAME: CPS PRINTING Addition and TI D APPLICANT ~~ ~VIEWER D FILE D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. D The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficie~cies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. [g] The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. [g] The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Steve White 6351 Corte del Abete# A 100, Carlsbad, CA 92009 [g] Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. D Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax#: Mail Telephone Fax In Person D REMARKS: By: Sergio Azuela Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA DCM ~ EJ 0 PC 2/20 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (619) 560-1468 + Fax (619) 560-1576 Carlsbad 980527 March 3, 1998 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST COMMERCIAL PLAN CHECK NO.: 980527 OCCUPANCY: B TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN JURISDICTION: Carlsbad USE: Print Shop/Office ACTUAL AREA: 23,350 SF 800 SF addition ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA: 72,000 SF STORIES: 2 HEIGHT: SPRINKLERS?: YES REMARKS: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: 2/9/98 DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED: March 3, 1998 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): OCCUPANT LOAD: 150 DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 2/20 PLAN REVIEWER: Sergio Azuela This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Code sections cited are based on the 1994 UBC. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1994 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list ( or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. LIST NO. 22, GENERAL COMMERCIAL WITHOUT ENERGY OR POLICY SUPPLEMENTS (1994 UBC) comforw.dot Carlsbad 980527 March 3, 1998 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92009, (619) 438-1161. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (619) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. • FIRE-RESISTIVE CONSTRUCTION 2. Clearly label and identify on the plans the fire-resistive corridors, area separation walls, shafts, occupancy separation walls. and floors, exit courts less than 10 feet wide and exit enclosures, along with their hourly ratings. Section 106.3.3. Hall 212. 3. Show any existing fire rated area separation walls, occupancy separation walls, demising walls, shafts or rated corridors. Identify and provide construction details for proposed new fire rated walls. Please clarify if the existing 1 hr rated wall construction is an existing 1 hr occupancy separation wall. If it is then the openings shall be 1 hr (not 314hr). 4. Specify on the plans the fire ratings of assemblies to protect penetrations or proposed openings in existing or new fire walls, floor-ceiling assemblies or roof-ceiling assemblies. • EXITS 5. In all occupancies, floors above the first story having 10 or more occupants, shall have not less than two exits. Section 1003.1. Clearly show on plans the two exits from the second floor. 6. The tenant space and new and/or existing facilities serving the remodeled area must be accessible to and functional for the physically disabled. See the attached correction sheet. Title 24, Part 2. 7. Provide an exit analysis plan (may be 8 1/2" x 11" or any convenient size). Carlsbad 980527 March 3, 1998 • STAIRWAYS 8. Stairway width must be at least 44 inches when serving 50 or more occupants; 36 inches when less than 50. Section 1006.2. • EXIT SIGNS 9. Exit signs are required whenever two exits are required. Show all required exit sign locations. Section 1013.1. • FOUNDATION 10. Provide a copy of the project soil report prepared by a California licensed architect or civil engineer. The report shall include foundation design recommendations based on the engineer's findings and shall comply with UBC Section 1804. • MISCELLANEOUS 11. GFCI protected convenience receptacles are required to be installed within 25' of roof mounted HVAC equipment. To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: Yes D No D The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 619/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Sergio Azuela at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. Carlsbad 980527 March 3, 1998 DEPARTMENT OF STATE ARCHITECT NON RESIDENTIAL TITLE 24 DISABLED ACCESS REQUIREMENTS The following disabled access items are taken from the 1995 edition of California Building Code, Title 24. Per Section 101.17.11, all publicly and privately funded public accommodations and commercial facilities shall be accessible to persons with disabilities as follows: (1) Any building, structure, facility, complex, or improved area, or portions thereof,.which are used by the general public. (2) Any sanitary facilities which are made available for the public, clients, or employees in such accommodations or facilities. (3) Any curb or sidewalk intended for public use that is constructed with private funds. (4) All existing accommodations when alterations, structural repairs or additions are made to such accommodations. NOTE: All Figures and Tables referenced in this checklist are printed in the California Building Code, Title 24. • REMODELS, ADDITIONS AND REPAIRS 1. When alterations, structural repairs or modifications or additions are made to an existing building, that building, or portion of the building affected is required to comply with all of the requirements for new buildings, per Section 11348.2. These requirements apply only to the area of specific alteration, repair or addition and shall include: a) A primary entrance to the building and the primary path of travel to the area in question, and include the following items which serve ~he area in question: i) Sanitary facilities. ii) Drinking fountains. iii) Public telephones. • SITE PLAN REQUIREMENTS 2. Clearly show that the site development and grading are designed to provide access to all entrances and exterior ground floor exits, as well as access to normal paths of travel, per Section 11278.1. Where necessary to provide access, shall incorporate pedestrian ramps, curb ramps, stairways and handrails, etc. 3. Plans show that more than one building is located on the proposed site. Accessible routes of travel shall be shown to be provided between buildings and accessible site facilities, per Section 11278.1. 4. Show, or note that at every primary public entrance, and at every major function area along, or leading to, an accessible route of travel, there is to be a sign displaying the international symbol of accessibility. Signs are required to indicate the direction to accessible building entrances and facilities, per Sections 11178.5.7 and 11278.3. Carlsbad 980527 March 3, 1998 • DISABLED ACCESS PARKING SPACES 5. Revise plans to show that at least one in every 8 accessible spaces are served by an access aisle :c:96" in width and designated as VAN ACCESSIBLE, per Section 11298.4.2. All such spaces may be grouped on one level of a parking structure. Please revise the plans to show the required access aisle width of 96". 6. Show or note on the plans that the accessible parking spaces are to be identified by a reflectorized sign, permanently posted immediately adjacent to and visible from each space, consisting of: a) A profile view of a wheelchair with occupant in white on dark blue background. b) The sign shall :c:70 in2 in area. c) When in the path of travel, they shall be posted ~80" from the bottom of the sign to parking space finished grade. d) Signs may also be centered on the wall of the interior end of the parking space :c:36" from the parking space finished grade, ground or sidewalk. e) Spaces complying with Section 11298.4.2 shall have an additional sign "Van-Accessible" mounted below the symbol of accessibility per Section 11298.5. f) In addition, each accessible space is required to be marked with the international symbol of accessibility. 7. Show, or note, that an additional sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place at each entrance to off street parking facilities, or immediately adjacent to and visible from each stall or space. The sign shall be ::::17" x 22" with lettering not ~1" in height. Per Section 11298.5 required wording is as follows. "Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for persons with disabilities may be towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed at ______ or by telephoning ______ " • CURB RAMPS • PLEASE CLEARLY SHOW THE CURB RAMPS ON THE PLANS. 8. Revise plans to show that curb ramps shall be constructed at each corner of a street intersection or where a pedestrian way crosses a curb, per Section 11278.5.1. • ENTRANCES AND CIRCULATION 9. Floors of a given story shall be a common level throughout, or shall be connected by pedestrian ramps, elevators or lifts. Section 11208.1. 1 o. Revise plans to show that all entrances, and exterior ground level exits, are accessible, per Section 1001.9.1. 11. Show that an accessible route of travel is to be provided to all portions of the building, to accessible building entrances and between the building and the public way, per Section 1114B.1.2. Carlsbad 980527 March 3, 1998 • DOORS • ALL DOORS IN THE ACCESS ROUTE SHALL BE SHOWN TO BE IN COMPLIANCE. 12. Revise plans, or door schedules to show that every required passage door has :2:32" clear width, per Section 1004.6. 13. Show, or note, that there is a level floor or landing on each side of all doors. The floor or landing is to be :S;½" lower than the doorway threshold, per Section 1004.9.1 a. 14. Show or note that all hand-activated door opening hardware meets the following requirements, per Section 1004.3.1: a) Is to be centered :?:30" but :S;44" above floor. b) Latching, or locking, doors in a path of travel are operated with a single effort by: i) Lever type hardware. ii) Panic bars. iii) Push-pull activating bars. iv) Or other hardware designed to provide passage without the requirement to grasp the hardware. 15. Show or note that the lower 1 O" of all doors comply with Section 1004.8.1, as follows: a) To be smooth and uninterrupted, to allow the door to be opened by a wheelchair footrest, without creating a trap or hazardous condition. b) Narrow frame doors may use a 1 O" high smooth panel on the push side of the door. NOTE: Exception for automatic or sliding doors. 16. Revise plans to show that the minimum strike edge distances are provided at the level area on the side to which a door (or a gate) swings, per Section 1004.9.2.3a: a) :?:24" at exterior conditions. b) :?:18" at interior conditions. c) :?:12" on the push side, if the door has both a latch and a closer. 17. Revise plans to show that the space between two consecutive door openings in a vestibule, which serves spaces other than a required exit stairway: a) Provide :?:48" clear space from any door opening into the vestibule when door is open 90°, per Section 1004.9.2.4a. b) Doors in series shall swing either: i) In the same direction. ii) Away from the space between the doors. 18. Provide a note on the plans that the maximum effort to operate doors, applied at right angles to hinged doors or at center plane at sliding doors, per Section 1004.5.1, will be: a) :S;8½# at exterior doors. b) :S;5# for interior doors. c) :S;15# where fire doors are required. Carlsbad 980527 March 3, 1998 19. Revise plans to show a level area, or landing, per Section 1004.9.2.2a: a) ~60" in the direction of door swing. b) ~48" in the direction opposite the door swing (or 44" if doors don't have latches or closers). • STAIRWAYS AND HANDRAILS 20. Revise plans to show that handrails are provided on each side of the stairs, per Section 1006.9.1. 21. Provide sections, details or notes to show that handrails are to be located ~34" but ~38" above nosing of treads, per Section 1006.9.2.1 a. 22. Show that handrails extend a ~12" beyond top nosing, and ~12"-plus-tread-width beyond the bottom nosing, per Section 1006.9.2.2a. 23. Per Section 1006.9.2.6a, please provide details, sections or notes to show that handgrip portions of handrails are: a) ~1 ¼" and ~1 ½" in cross sectional dimension. b) The shape may provide an equivalent gripping surface. c) The handgrip portion shall have a smooth surface, without any sharp corners. 24. Show or note that interior stair treads are marked at the upper approach and the lower tread of each stair, by a strip of clearly contrasting color, per Section 1006.16.1, as follows: a) At least 2" wide. b) Placed parallel to and not more than 1" from the nose of the step or landing. c) The strip shall be as slip resistant as the other treads of the stair. 25. Note that all tread surfaces comply with Section 1006.16.2.1, as follows: a) Be slip resistant. b) Have smooth, rounded or chamfered exposed edges. c) Have no abrupt edges at the nosing. d) Nosing shall not project ~1 ½" past the face of the riser above. e) Open risers are not permitted. • SANITARY FACILITIES • PLEASE CLARIFY IF THERE ARE EXISTING BATHROOMS ON THE SECOND FLOOR. NOTE THAT IF THERE ARE EXISTING BATHROOMS IN THE SECOND FLOOR THEY HAVE TO BE DISABLED ACCESSIBLE. 26. Sanitary facilities are required to be accessible, unless the enforcing agency determines that compliance with these standards would create an unreasonable hardship. Provide a completed HARDSHIP WAIVER REQUEST FORM if equivalent facilitation is requested to be permitted, per Section 11158.1. 27. Where separate nonaccessible facilities are provided for each sex, separate accessible facilities are required to be provided for each sex as well. Where nonaccessible unisex facilities are provided, accessible unisex facilities are required to be provided, per Section 11158.2. Carlsbad 980527 March 3, 1998 28. Revise plans to show that passageways leading to sanitary facilities have required clear access widths, per Section 111 SB.4. Show that all doorways have: a) ~32" clear opening. b) A clear area: i) ~60" in the direction of the door swing. ii) ~44" away from the direction of door swing. c) All strike edge clearance dimensions are required to be met.(i.e. 18" strike edge distance). 29. Note that the doorways leading to sanitary facilities shall be identified, per Section 111 SB.5, as follows: a) An equilateral triangle ¼" thick with edges 12" long and a vortex pointing upward at men's rest rooms. b) A circle ¼" thick, 12" in diameter at women's rest rooms. c) A 12" diameter circle with a triangle superimposed on the circle and within the 12" diameter at unisex rest rooms. d) The required symbols shall be centered on the door at a height of 60". e) Braille signage shall also be located on the wall adiacent to the latch outside of the doorways leading to the sanitary facilities, per Section 1117B.5.9. • MULTIPLE ACCOMMODATION SANITARY FACILITIES 30. Note that if standard compartment doors are used, that the following will be provided, per Section 111 SB. 7 .1.3: a) ~9" clearance for footrests underneath. b) A self closing device. If non-standard compartment doors are used, clearance at the strike edge as specified in Section 1004.9.2.2 is required. • RESTROOM FIXTURES AND ACCESSORIES 31. Show, or note, on the plans that accessible urinals meet the following requirements, per Section 111 SB.9.4 and California Plumbing Code: a) The rim of at least one urinal shall: i) Project 14" from the wall. ii) Be ~17" above the floor. b) The force to activate the flush valve shall be :;,s# force. c) The control mechanism is be located :;,44" above the floor. d) ~30" x 48" clear floor space is provided in front of the accessible urinal. Carlsbad 980527 March 3, 1998 32. Plans indicate proposed showers. Revise plans to show, or note, compliance with the following requirements, per Section 11158.6.2 and California Plumbing Code: Please clarify if the compartment adjacent to the accessible toilet room shown on sheet A-2 is a shower. If this compartment is not a shower and the existing bathrooms in the building are not provided with any shower, please disregard this correction. Otherwise please show compliance. a) Compartments are: i) ~42" in width between wall surfaces. ii) ~48" in depth between wall surfaces. iii) Have an entrance opening of 2::36". b) Grab bars comply with Section 11158.8 located: i) On walls adjacent to and opposite the seat. ii) Mounted ~33" but :S:36" above the shower floor. c) If a threshold or recessed drop is used, it shall be: i) :S:½" in height. ii) Be beveled or sloped :S:45° from the horizontal. d) The shower floor shall slope :S:½ per ft. toward the rear to a drain located :S:6" of the rear wall. e) The floor surface shall be of either Carborundum, grit faced tile or of material providing equivalent slip resistance. f) Indicate a folding seat, located on the wall opposite the controls, 18" above the floor. g) The soapdish shall be located on the control wall :S:40" above the shower floor. h) If a separate shower compartment is not provided, the shower is be: i) Located in a corner, with L-shaped grab bars extending along two adjacent walls. ii) A folding seat adjacent to the shower controls is to be provided. i) A flexible hand-held shower unit is required with: i) A hose ~60" long. ii) Head mounted 48" above finished floor. NOTE: Two wall-mounted heads may be installed in lieu of the hand-held unit in areas subject to excessive vandalism, per Section 5-1505. END OF DOCUMENT Carlsbad 980527 March 3, 1998 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PREPARED BY: Sergio Azuela BUILDING ADDRESS: 2304 Faraday Ave. BUILDING OCCUPANCY: B BUILDING PORTION ' BUILDING AREA (ft. 2) Addition 800 Air Conditionino Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE PLAN CHECK NO.: 980527 DATE: March 3, 1998 CPS PRINTING Addition & TI TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN VALUATION VALUE MULTIPLIER ($) 48,000 (City valuation) 48,000 [gj 1991 USC Building Permit Fee D Bldg. Permit Fee by ordinance: $ 401.50 [gj 1991 UBC Plan Check Fee D Plan Check Fee by ordinance: $ 260.98 Type of Review: [gj Complete Review D Structural Only D Hourly D Repetitive Fee Applicable D Other: Esgil Plan Review Fee: $ 208.78 Comments: Sheet 1 of 1 . macvalue.doc 5196 ... PLANNINC/ENCINEERINC APPROVALS PERMITNUMBERCB 9£30~;?'? DATE ;J-.:J~ff' -==-------- ADDRESS---==;;;;__· --:~:::....__Lf __ ~--~----',4;J~_/f71r...,;.___ _____ _ RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL ADDITION MINOR < < $10,000.00) OTHER CNANTi~PROVE~ PLAZA CAMINO REAL CARLSBAD COMPANY STORES VILLACE FAIRE COMPLETE OFFICE BUILDINC ------------------- PLANNER oocs/Mlsforms/Planning Engineering Approvals ... .., ""': ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET D Estimate based on unconfirmed information from applicant. D Calculation based on building plancheck plan submittal. Address: 2 3cJ '-f ~Jo/' .At-:<--, Bldg. Permit No. /4.? 9f _§').. / Prepared by;.1). K,'c/<... Date: 3 · b .9g Checked by: ____ Date: ____ _ EDU CALCULATIONS: List type's and square footages for all uses. Types of Use: O(f>'<-,JL ~/Units: oOD EDU'·s: , 4'f ADT CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses. Types of Use: ______ _ Sq. Ft./Units: ------ADT's: _____ _ FEES REQUIRED: PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE REQUIRED: DYES D NO (See Building Department for amount) WITHIN CFO: DYES (no bridge & thoroughfare fee, reduced Traffic Impact Fee) D NO ~ARK-IN-LIEU FEE PARK AREA: ___ _ / FEE/UNIT: X NO. UNITS: t( 2. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE =$ _____ _ ADT's/UNITS: j£_ ,_ X FEE/ADT: _'2_2_.....___ 3S-2-=$ ___ ~-- D 3. BRIDGE AND THOROUGHFARE FEE ADT's/UNITS: ____ _ X FEE/ADT: ___ _ =$ _____ _ D 4. FACILITIES MANAGEMENT FEE ZONE:. ___ _ / UNIT/SQ.FT.: ____ _ X FEE/SQ.FT./UNIT: __ --=$ ____ _ E("' 5. SEWER FEE PERMIT No. 5rc· o/'J,,JJ EDU's: __ , '1~:f ___ _ BENEFIT AREA: r EDU's: __ , _L/_____._'j __ X FEE/EDU: I, '°6 Z.-f DRAIN~GE BASIN: J{3 . = $ __ <g...;:....;O 3.____ X FEE/EDU: D 6. DRAINAGE FEES PLDA. ___ _ HIGH ___ /LOW __ _ ACRES:. _____ _ X FEE/AC:. ___ _ =$ _____ _ D 7. SEWER LATERAL {$2,500) =$ _____ _ J 5 q) / TOTAL OF ABOVE FEES*:$_ *NOTE: This calculation sheet is NQI a complete list (?fall fees which may be due. Dedications and Improvements may also be required with Building Permits. P:\DOCS\MISFORMS\8P0002.FRM REV 01/22/97 City of Carlsbad 98068 Fire Department • Bureau of Prevention Plan Review: Requirements Category: Building Plan Check Date of Report: Tuesday, March 3, 1998 Reviewed by:'1Jl, {lJ~- Contact Name Steve White Address 6351 Corte Del Abeto Ste A10D City, State Carlsbad CA 92009 Bldg. Dept. No. CB980527 Planning No. Job Name CPS Printing ----=----------------- Job Address 2304 Faraday ----~-----------~--Ste. or Bldg. No. ____ _ ~ Approved -The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans; information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifica- tions, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. D Disapproved -Please see the attached report of deficiencies. Please make corrections to plans or specifications necessary to indicate compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. For Fire Department Use Only Review 1st~-- CFD Job# __ 98----'0_6_8 __ 2nd __ _ 3rd __ _ File# ___ _ 2560 Orion Way · • Carlsbad, California 92008 Other Agency ID • (619) 931-2121 . . I . . : . . I ~ . ' ·.. I I .· . ~ 4 ,1 •• 1"110..IE<:T CP'& ~IAmNI/ ,Al~ . .$.a.P¼J· l"Clft. ' . iae-,v-,t=eAJ Iuo~~ J()a NO. -·Engjwer 9153 Olcma Stroct T~r,lc:: City. California 91780_ ·--,----S---·--r---·· ······-·· ' 02/19/98 07:11 TX/RX NO.1609 P.002 L0C:A'l'ION ~L.t"~,. C.-,. lfflh . ' lsao Kawasaki. Stru btural Engineer 915: Olema Street TCf!lblo City, Califorlli.a 91780 JC:,a NO. . ' ' -·-. . ---···"--. ·-· -··--- 02/19/98 07:11 TX/RX NO.1609 P.003 • ~-ti# •TaN, • I --r.-:-1--t--·o.---... f--t-r-t-'"lr--····---•.. 1-;..,..;-.,..~---······ ··•·· --· JsipKaw-.ki -'En . . smcer 91 ~3 Dlema Stteot . T~[nple City, California 91780 . ·-···· _, .. --t-,---.. JQ• NO. ,.·.· :_'.'./_,··_;::· 1 ; :· r :,_;..,_ , __ • -~. ;· :· .'I;. :. ,:, -~, ... :·:+'.,~-.,..-,··,,-... '.~·),,.4~:~ :'';-+: __ ,:·:·_. __ :,-~I:'_-_:,_~_·_._,'._·:_:,_:;__ .. :, __ :~-:-.···~~--;_·~;-~-' .. ·-:.-.:, ·.'--:·i. /_:. 1 ..,t=:_;~_:_?,>"_:'.·: 1 1_ --:-------1.· ,F_:.~~.-__ :._ .. ~--~:_:=-.. ··-__ .-._ .. :_: __ -~_-__ --:_: __ ~:-.~-"-_:: ! r· ., .... l _._.-;-H-1-.~.~---~ . --· .....,_ --,-------....... ;. ·-~!:·~::.:-::::::: ...... 7""--. --'-~ ....... -: : i .l--~. ~--. ·-J·•• ' ·. ·.-·---.· .--:·---~--........ :------~·.-···-, :.:.-.;) •:,, ·'0 _ _,_. • .,i ~ ·.1. ;_ __ L· ..... , ·•·. ...•.. • .! l ¥-:...~~·--~:.-~..:.... ..... , ______ ···-···--··-····---· ... ---··-·---~-----····-··-· .;:/r ~:~ix.?.'.~ ·, .. . .. ; -· · ···v· :r.;:._;t..,.~·· .. ; : .. -.,;·;:.~~ .•· .. ·/~;0·~ .. --:-·,·. ·. ·~· ,,•,,. 02/19/98 07:11 TX/RX NO.1609 P.004 • PC>N · h:raol-r- s 'Bnpiecr 3 ..... "40, I..D<:ATION 915~ OlemaStrect . !TIM, T~ble City, California 91780 ... --'"'-:-· -· .... '' -. . '. . ·-· ......... -., ... ___ ----h-···. I I r!""°--:--"~••• .. "'-,..__,, ........... ,,. .. " "•• •••••"••-.-•••-•·-''"''··-•••••• ' __.. _, ___ , __ ,, _______ _ ··· . .....:..-!iv 1/'Y··· Ir;(' · • • ·····-····--···---·~-···········~ .......... -·--··· • ·---····-·--·· ···-·-~ ~~~ ';f-f"'_f-:-f_..M···· -~ ·--:~._-·--.--, .,,~i,,,.,.-.. , ... ,---···--·111oo----.'.__,.,._:__: 1 H• ___ ,_._._;..., , , r ... ' ., 0 ' • ' ' • ' ' i ' i 1, .. --.-......+-'--l--1--l-;-+'....;;,-h·f. ~ ·-~-::ii ·i?-:. :--:.~i;;-;.-:J ~t.:lf·r·~.::;J>:i~~--~----·--.. ···--.;----·,-·-f"T"' J-r--'H~-,--..- 1 -i- 1 ,...:..._ +,-· ./!'t.:tl. .......... ( ... _:.._ ... ~ _.2f..:._,_. _____ .... _:a..... .. -.... , ........ -'----~-·-·-.,:.,_;_ · , .. ,-.' , . 1 • • • ·., 1 ., 1-1--1--!--i--i--' -+·i...:....~·-1.;~1··,:-;;;~~~ )i-i:-:;_)>~p_ .. ~)~i~·l!,:.L .. ~:~---~-~~h-. .~ I I ; .. ·; ., ~ ( :· .-, l ....:...:,____.__,~-• • ----.-' • ~ • j.,.. ' I ••• •._...:,..,..,..____ ' ! ·1 I' I I ;,_~ ~/I.:'·· W /.~ vz.1,..-·i-:,.-.. ,P..'tf' :3"1.-~~-==.:.~~:-~-:.:_:.~=:_~·-·--· . -. . , . : ····-~, .. :. I I ,-I • • • • , -1 • l-l-,-1-,f-,-;--i....+-'-.-1--·-1--,--'-· ..,.,,..., ____ , ____ p,---~z·-fo . ' .. _...,...;, . : I " ' . '.' ., . I .,. I I ~:f -.... -·-· ....... -····· ___; .... -.----==-··· -~I. ----···..: .. _..:. __ : ...... ..:..., ___ .,~_.:.,~. ,-. ' ·: ·; ., . I • ' .• ! ' . I : I : ;· ~;:r*= 1,~:,-.x ~ ,~i-~-Jrf;:::;;~,-~-'-9,i;ffeit;.·zi.~:.t;J-i.~. : :··1=R t--'H'-!--i---.--+-'--'-... -4--~..;.· .. -_..:_... . --.. ,.. .--···· _.,.,_..,._.._. _·!l__i_ __ ,: .. ~-'-· _ ' J • I 1 ·-· , • ;. l 1 I i I' . ...,.., II''.' . . ---. . . I ,. I• 11 I I ____ ..... _____ .. ,.,. ; 'i ~ I : -, : .... ·---:--· .. ··.--.! .. I I • I • I : I ~ 1-+-+-1-l-4-l,.I..J.i...;;¢,:b2,1;~~.i~".:.:.:..zs-;:i~ :_. I -:-: ~·. ', ·~ • ••• ~ -· .. • ~·:·~-: -~--·::_~~--_:· • • --~~ j-1-..l-t ...J..j -4-l-1,l....i.-f,-....... ' +.-: ·;~f.,-Js;'..:?<fo-" = f>.8·~~c~,;;;o•iJ#" r;Es~~~~: .. :.~: .. _.~_c,--.....1.. l-~H-4-t-r' -:.' ..... ..;...~,c......, ____ ---~-~ :-: •. ,, . I •• --.--=:.:.:: . -··---·-· ,~_,_· ....... ______ ~ J-l-f-i--i-.--,....!.-l-...:..-1!-;i-: -. ft" --___ ., __ ---.-..... ' ·: ;__, _ _l__. __ 1-----• ..... _ . .:., __ __,c.__; ____ ...!._j ·-,------...L.~- l-!--'l-i'-11-.+-..-.;_,:_....;.-_-:--~-.••• ,.,,._, ____ ,,. ... ,_.. : I , •' 1 : --'---:---•--..:,__ __ ,~·-_,''~·--.;...,_ __ _,_ _ _;__ l-i'-1-!.i,-.-T-· ...,._;___;___.i; _ _;_ ___ ,'.,_ __ ·-·-----·-.. t-;----R--'--+.;... ___ ...:,.. __ ._ 1· ~ 4.. 1 I ! T'I"" •, 1---. ~-'---~--------!...[ .,_. _t ... :,-i ·:--1-1;..' ...;...+4i_;_-,.i_...._:,_...,;._. ' . ,,• . ·--··-... . -~------;': : : ;,, '-~~:~~~:··~-:~ .. ~:::~:":~::.:~.-~=:::::~..L~~:::=-.-.. -~~-=:~~.:-=;'=--=:.-; .. ·-~·~~~-:~...,;-·-'------;~·· ... :-__., ___ ...;._· _. -;:....'· .! /~, C 'Ai/1/"lfl..lJI .:l'/f-.-.. ·:---:·~-:--:-.. --0 -··-·-·-.. ·---::-·"·-·-,--,--+--,---~-.:___;.._ .,l::".Lr,,frl ......... r.ir4, . . ' . I I'.· '17 1-t-r-+---...._._I.__I---·, ,;.__".;:;.,: .. "ii"fll!'~ ... = ; ... : . Al,·P ·x t o:.x. Jr>cs. ·-w.-' i . .: .1--· ; ~. 0 .. , 1 .: . . . . 1 . 1-1--·t-: ...;.·;.....,..i.J ......... I ..i.'~---a·i:-, _V....:,_···-~.--·~-·-"i!f-w~~-.... ,:::V:..;.;;..-,,, .....,.,. .. -, .... t,.-..;.,., ... ,-............ :--:: .. -:: .. ~.... . •.. :::'.'.°. <!. '6.~,. __ f!V_.-···--i-~--~----··-· ·~·:··:~-+ 01 j ;·,:.: I :••·--.-,·:~.·-::J_~f~~·~;:·.: -~~-~=:~:~-~~~••;~~.::. . .; ' . , , ; , ; ! ~-··w=-.~:·~-~--lif""'(JtC. ~:-::+_·t:;7-:x,:.,r)b~-x~ ft,1.·-=:::~~-'J.t.1_~¥;0..,;.. ·: ' I ' .; • • ~+; 1 1-t-t-+-+-+--. 1 .;.....-..,,...........· ·_. \l ,;~, i 5$ ,.'. .Jq;~:~ 1P'; Ii,'-:.:~ ~=:~--, .,_: --'--:~. : :"· --~-~---·-, , : : J-HH-4---l,1...;..-.....;..-:...-1---:'_"_· ·=-=·~:=~:~--:--:--·-·: :~-.:..:JJ.:--·---~-~~-,-... :-: -: · : ' . ~JI ......._-+-I "-I-· -'-l--'-)_,;;__,_~-l-'--.. ,·~-.·~=··. ,:,J'k .. ~J .. ;,/j£?i/;;;;;__-~:~~~-:;;;_~:_;·_···;··> . ; .. ,1. ! ; ,I 1 1 i I l- -+-11-l-....-,!-,+-'-llf-4.-..:!-l---·---·-~~i-; I 1' . ' ·. .., '-·--~----·--'-·~:..-' .. ; : ,, ' : I • • ~· : I : . ~ --· I I I ' I t I I , • ·, ' ., '...:,__!_ .. ~ ' • ' ' ' I I I ' I . . ' I ~ :. !· • ·----, •. • 1 1 , ; ;· . • . , · · --JL·1·r:Ll§.JJ, · n-lA.1 -7.P-· -· f-f-+-+-+-!-,.j-l..,.J......i--1-:/c)IJ,tt;;--~·~*-i : · ,6~.£. ~. -~f?/;;e.:p_:-,~:·· ·~cJt.~-rrrt..: . .!L., ~· --µt. .. t-+-+-t-+-!-1-+-..,......;---+---, r---·-' ' . . : ; ' '2. 1:71:";·~ '-:-;---ru•, ',.,.. : . .. -. ' . . . ! ,1 ',:. . ~~ ; ! . ' I . .~ .. ·--·· __ 1.----:-" ........... ......-,C.. l_ ... T ~ ... -.---·--. . . _i.....J_:., • I ' ' • I l I-H-!-!---l-4-i,_...~_jJ-. -1,..-j ...;.:_.;_ :· -, -,().1 ~ ~: -~ ~1)(,·~·;~: .. ~. •j7!)4·'/1 t,..~ : J ; •• :· •! '1 : . ; ·:.: ! 1 ! !' : ! ·i. i 'I . I ·1·: ;~~-".,:; ,·:·,.'.r-~:+r-·..:. ... : ! .. ·.:f·f,~1 ··1J .• m: .' .~.-~1:1 .. i·! I! I I :,i (, ....+-!--l-+.....j......--1--1-~,~---... ·~rt,' '"1 ' • • ~ -·c-,-" '· ,. • · · ·· I ! ; I I I I I 1-+,-···1-·· i-+-,:1---,µi-;.,..:~,~·~,~ otr."".., r -~· ~ ~ "" A-.!J,;.. ,. v '.1-+ i;,J· ··:.. /,:,. · ·O· · ·-·r.-;····. · · :·· ... ,.. . , . 'I {'\ • i-1"~ ,_ . __ .. ::J'-,• .. -"""".."'. . .-·-"•• ~J .• ~ .. !'_:_,.:...:..· , .. ' . ) ., ' I I . . . , I,,,•,. r·,, ,· .. a,.,_o,·. .. . ·1 , .. -,,·.I:,· ·~·.·-;-;-··it Ii l--1-+-+-+--+-+-'-.l-.l,.....J,....:_;·..:...: ....:.: ·_,_, --. "~~"'Fi-' ~.~Lo,{' ~ ~·~1-.7,fl,Jt..J1~ ,,t)_;~~· 1il7' ;r;:~::..~-.. ;.····:·+f.6 ' . . ' -~ . .. 't..;_ .. ···-··. '. '--L!LL.~ bi±: ~.= .. ~.~~~=~=~=!=~=t=~=~=:=~~~=~: ":_: ·:.:~~::i:=;:::~ -:-:~·:~~.~-~-~L~·~.~ .~.~~~.;J..iJ. '. ·i-+rTi ~~ .. Wil· ··: : ~ . ; .. : I : : . :·,. , . ' : .. ! ,--...' .. ,--,.._.,:-· ... , u ,.~: .. -,,~ , ~· ·-~ ·ij !l}j,J :?[ r' ! I '•' • · • • : r • • • ,. t,, • 1 1 f· J J _ 1 1 ~ , KJ ~__,:,_ J.r.,.., _____ .;;...,-L,..fr,r ~-· •· I , · ; • •, , ·: .• .: f , I, .i. · · . : · ~ I i r • ! : i .1. f -:-l-. .. w .. ,. 1 i. . . : . -. , '·· 't. . i · , • : ~ I • J 1 ; • /·!:',,. :.~J;:~>;: > ·I'' I ' ' I I I I I f ., 1 ·! ·:r:--·~--~ .. :~.·:·;·-~;·:r.~:-.J::::: .... (#.1i .. ~.!.'~.~·J: :~i=d .. , ; ·. ·: ~-:::-• • 1 I l __ :.,!-~.-!.....l...:.!.. ! ; ; 1 ·! ' 1 : , • i • •• ,Ai ,,' ! I :· '! •,, : ; .,· .. ·i l. J" l .j. 1· ,I ;• _ '# ,,· _.'. :¥~•.r .. '" t .-. ',J7.!..!,...!:,_,,'::;'.,,'in" 1· .I· · 1· .; l .I i · .. \ , ~·;·f-~.iL~ ~:··L°l·;--t-~-'l"'j-.,...., J'>,.." V .. ".:-;··~~.~·,.;:;.::.:'. ·I..! I' 'II'.;•:, I ,I I •I l j I.I. r, l,l•~'ry"~_,' 'Z-IJ""'rT~.rto/·"' ~. :~:;-.-:·,t .. w-,. ··· .• ,. ~ i ··!, ·:. i 1! l ... ,,. -~ ,._,.,·I·. ' ,. I ' , ,. ' ,. , , i.:.;. 1~1 '1'' i I 1·· i r I ~, , . · · , , • 1 i' • ! : I ! ±!: • ~-~_,e.,>.ij · · ~ !~ ~ 1,; ,I'· I - :;i(ih~·. \',.,'.;;,·.' .. :>. ~ '.··_.I : 1 '. .: : I I I!',,,·· I I ,1,,l· i -1(2'/~! ·J.:::r .... /J',L~}"!'ti · ~· ~··"'!""il'-al-i-1-!--+-s *°-!:,-J..*l~..-J.:..,.L.-L:...lj-..!-J.....,;._,~--., , J I I I I j_ f.·I ' ~-.. ~- ·,,,,·.·:~_:_;.·:_;,:_1~.~.'.·.-,'.;.:.;;_;_.,:~.'.:,·.~.;:,;;·,;.._ .... ··:i·;,:·:·.' ... ·:_··'.:_:·:! . ' • ' ::, .. · , .. ·:.;' :: ·.· •. ·.·.· ·!·_··.·: .. :'.· .. ·, .. · ..... :_.·,·_;, .. :.: .. ___ :·,· ~, .. ,. ·. ' •. ~ w • ~-\';-:_t::<.~=:: :·:::".?~·;/~'.~.---. '\> .~ .... ~·' . '· .... , . .: ,.'" ' " • • -Ii I ' ' • -'i-4 ...,'t 1 , , • 1 \." • •~, • ' 0 •, 0 :;: • ", ,, ' •,, • 0 • • • 1 • '•• • ' • ,."I',• • ! ! I I· ' I -i ' , 02/19/98 07:11 TX/RX NO.1609 P.005 • PQR · ·· · ·•· · ··· ·Illao kawaaaki -·&ginccr i.oei1:r11;1N 915' OlcmaStreet Temple City. California 9·1780 ----------..--r---~--.. --·-r-..• . J· > ·; .. -._., ...... .'!.~ .. _;··. -. ·~ ...... ·. :" .... ' • •lo ,, : : : : , .! I • • , r • -------:-++!--------'--'-,~I , ____ ,_ • • ,.,,...._._,....,..--.,c._-,----- t-i-1-•;-+--,---•••. l¼k_, .......... -·-· ..... ····--·--·-'..: ,,, Iii I:. I .. :·~ .. --;--_·: ..• ··:-. _,:·-;···-·-... i.; I : t--+---i-+-+--"''---M-----· .--·-···-·N·--~-·-+---'',--,:+-,-+,--'--,---'-i-----i-......,..-::--------·----· ..... ·-----,----·~---·-, ,,I t ! • !, I : " • : , J ' , : • • • ', t-l--"-+--1--i--'--'' _ .... --::, .. __ ,., ... · -___ · ••. -~ • --~: ! .. !· .i· l ·1 ·:~: · , -'---'------''---'---"'--' 0 h \ 1\ ! I , i----+-.!..__.;.,__..,,,_' ____ ~_..,..:. ___ _,; ________ ~-,1 ... ·I i J :'!.. .· 1· 1. .i I I ' 1 I .J ! .,. ' ! ·. ,' I ! . ---..... ;-, --,-,-".~.-i------.---, -.-7-----'-t-,, ..... "'-l--,1f-.-+_-,1-r,...-,;.....:.!-1i--/f-_-.·-.-,""· "",;....,,,.;...1··-,-,_...;_c.., .---'-,'--;---77~------, ...,...1 -1: ---=+-+-+-,. :, -. ·. . -~---· ·-· ..... -.. · ..i.-..! . ;.,_i__. • -----+------...:..-1-+'-···-·:, •..... :.....,+----~·--··--·· ... --.. ---·----I ! f. ! i ! ! ~-, ( i .. ~~~}.,: I • . . I ! I ........ ••• .... LI'!'·,..··+,·-· ___ ••• ---------7""-..... , , .. ,_ . J i. i I i I t /. I L I f• l • I .... .......;_, ____ ··'--'-'--,.......,,~,._"-___ ~_ ~-;> :·· :.. 1~-:-.--.. ··'"' -------... - 1 14·1 ,.. 1 • 1· r. ! .~1 .= ~--1 __ ._. ___ • . . • . i 11-:...i. . .J 1-_--~+-.·-~:+~:.,.,~+: .... :'·~-,-.. :-· ... :----.:--~=:~-=~------.. ·--.... ' l;; .: ·:· I :~:==:..L~.J~-_:-.-~:_+ .. ~-:-:-~·~--~; '; .; , 1 : ,_,:....:._., .... -·-· . r 1 , 1 , , , 1 .-• , , , 1_ • ...........:.._ __ ,.....J ______ . -~_.___;......-;,,_, . . . ~· 1. t-:-,+.,..·,;,,-·+\-+ .. -!'-+'----'+-. -·------, .. -....... ·--. --... ~ '" l 1 . 1 i I ~ . ' ; · 1 • • • • , ;, ~i : • ' ' • ,.· ~ '• I. ., ' I · 1. ; I ' ! . \• .. I i' . I i I t .:;. .. ~:~ .:;i·,',:,: c·, j. j, 1 • · j .. _:_-_---• ' • • 'i I i , .. _: _;. i 1' ,, • 1 • :_·,··~~-:T"I · :_1 · ·.( ·.1 -,I, I •• •• 1 • ._,:_,_,,.,..:.. ...... .:...:.4,· ·--'-; .. '·,:" • ,.. • •••• .... I· , 1 1 1 · 1 1 r , ... , 1 i., . ·, , .. , , i : .• = ±J:i: , ,::tt~;_;:·:·> ··i !. 1 rr.·:·-.-~ ,~~· ,:• :· ·,, : --TI' ~~~t.h"·~;L-s·~; !~r~~~ -; · r ;_· 1 ./ ;: : ;.: 77-Y ~::IJ:_.:r~:;,,.;:;.:·· I I 1 .;· :. :~. I I I 'j . ) I.~ I I •·!'I I 'I i Iii I I·, i I·,.·· ·; ft.~,-~;,J"'·"''!"'"". I ,.1.· •. ! .·.: : .. ::·'! J·i ! i' !'•t'>, ·· '·:I ··:.1,-f I I I I ·Ii I h-J.-..1 1 i ·!·:.::.J_J I L.i....J i:?:::-:-.~~": t.. £"::, ·:·'= • 1 ! ~ ; 1• ". 1• J ·! ~ • 1• , 1 ., 1 , ! 1 1 , • ! ·, r···,. ! , ~' i-r,-·-·t ' ,·.>..:~_,»,·.:,11·tt,·1 \;.r·, I 'I ·J.1111 1,,1.il 1illll. ... !'fi_:1,! . : • I· 1 : . , -· :....,,L:.._____ < i . , I I ; ·1 ! ! __ ._ ... ~.L-· ~! _:.....::...+-LL....L.1 :· I ,: I ')'°""1"! . :·: :-·· \ .. ' .. ; ' . ·.:<f :··:·:.'.:°§<:.> .. (. _.:..... ! ~,.'~¥;--··.·: ... . ..... ' .. ,,,', ··,.·: .. •· • ll'l.~,-· .. ·--:--!--t-..-----.------..,...,....,.,-,-..... -1.--.,.... .......... _...,. __ ~.:,;,,...;...._.:,. _________ N_ ,• :.· 02/19/98 07: 11 TX/RX N0.1609 P.006 • : ' ! GEOTECHN-ICS INCORPORATED EXPLANATION Approximate Location of Boring SITE PLAN 2300, 2304, 2308 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, California PROJECT NO. 0113-001-00 DOCUMENT NO. 3-0205 FIGURE NO. 1 ,--- C B Commercial Real Estate Group June 29, 1993 4.2 Fill Project No. 0113-001-00 Doc. #3-0205 Page 4 Fill was observed in all of the exploratory borings and consisted primarily ·of olive green- grey lean silty clay (CL), has low plasticjty, is dry to moist, and firm to hard. The surface of the fill was dry to approximately 18 inches, and was desiccated with small open ground cracks. The fill materials were derived from the Point Loma Formation, and are also highly expansive. 4.3 Groundwater No seepage or groundwater was observed in our investigation. Changes in rainfall, irrigation, or site drainage could produce seepage or locally perched groundwater conditions within the soil or bedrock underlying the site.- 5.0 GEOLOGIC HAZARDS AND SEISMICITY 5.1 Geologic Hazards The subject site is not located within an area previously known for geologic hazards, including active faulting, nor was evidence of past soil failures or faulting noted in our investigation. 5.2 Seismicity and Faulting The subject site is located about 7 miles east of the Rose Canyon fault zone. It has recently been suggested that this fault is active, capable of generating a magnitude 6.4 earthquake (maximum probable event). The estimated peak site. ground acceleration for such and event is 0.36g. Design of structures should comply with the requirements of the governing jurisdictions, building codes and standard practices · of the Association of Structural Engineers of California. Groundbreaking due to active faulting is considered to have a low potential, due to the distance from active fault traces. ,- C B Commercial Real Estate Group June 29, 1993 Project No. 0113-001-00 Doc. #3-0205 Page 5 6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 6.1 General Discussion No geotechnical conditions were apparent during the investigation which would preclude construction of the three buildings as planned. The most significant geotechnical constraints noted are the presence of expansive fill soil and bedrock materials, and the potential Jor a minor transition between bedrock and fill soils underlying the site. Additionally, the existing surface soils are weathered including desiccation and expansive cracking. It is recommended that the upper 4 feet of soils underlying the proposed buildings be removed and recompacted. During recompaction, the soils should be moisture conditioned to four percent over the optimum moisture content, to mitigate the expansive potential of the building pad soils. The remainder of this report presents recommendations in detail. These recommendations are based on empirical and analytical methods typical of the standard of practice in southern California. If these recommendations appear not to cover any specific feature of the project, please contact our office for additions or revisions to the recommendations. 6.2 Plan Review It is recommended tt,at foundation plans, and grading plans be reviewed by Geotechnics Incorporated prior to plan finalization. 6.3 Site Preparation For the entire site, all existing vegetation and construction debris should be excavated and hauled off site. Site preparation should then be performed consisti'ng of the removal and compaction of four feet of existing soil in the areas of the proposed structures. The removals should extend -laterally beyond the limits of proposed structures to a distance of 5 feet. The bottom of the resulting excavation should then be observed by a representative of Geotechnics Incorporated to evaluate if conditions are as anticipated. C B Commercial Real Estate Group June 29, 1993 Project No. 0113-001-00 Doc. #3-0205 Page 6 If conditions are as anticipated, the remQved soil should then be replaced as a uniformly compacted fill as described in Section 6.5. In areas that will be paved, it is recommended that the. existing soil be recompacted to a minimum depth of 12 inches, and be recompacted to at least 95% of ASTM 1557. 6.4 Excavation Observation Fo,undation excavations and site grading excavations should be observed by Geotechnics lncorporate.d., During grading, Geotechnics Incorporated should provide observation and testing services continuously. Such observations are considered essential to identify field conditions that differ from those anticipated by the preliminary investigations, to adjust designs to actual field conditions, and to determine that the grading is accomplished in general accordance with the recommendations of this report. Recommendations presented in this report are contingent upon Geotechnics Incorporated performing such services. Our personnel should perform sufficient testing of fill during grading to support our professional opinion as to compliance with compaction recommendations. 6.5 Fill Compaction All fill and backfill to be placed in association with site improvements should be accom- plished at a· minimum of four percent over optimum moisture conditions and using equipment that is capable of producing a uniformly compacted product. The minimum · relative compaction recommended for fill is 90 percent of maximum density based on ASTM 01557 (modified Proctor). Sufficient observation and testing should be performed by the geotechnical consultant so that an opinion can be rendered as to the compaction achieved. Fill should contain no rock material greater that .12 inches in greatest dimension. Imported fill sources, if needed, should be observed prior to hauling onto the site to determine the suitability for use. Representative samples of imported materials and on site soils should be tested by the geotechnical consultant in order to evaluate their appropriate engineering properties. Imported soil should have an expansion index of no more that 60 based on ASTM Test Method 4829. ~ I C B Commercial Real Estate Group June 29, 1993 Project No. 0113-001-00 Doc. #3-0205 Page 7 During grading operations, soil types other than those analyzed in the geotechnical reports may be encountered by the contractor. The geotechnical consultant should be notified to evaluate the suitability of these soils for use as fill and as finish grade soils. 6.6 Fill Slopes The construction of compacted fill slopes should be performed in accordance with section 6.5, Fill Compaction. The slope faces should be compacted to the recommended 90 percent, either by rolling with a sheepsfoot roller or suitable heavy equipment, or by overfilling the slope and cutting back to design grade. Fill slopes should be constructed at slope ratio of 2: 1 (horizontal:vertical) or flatter, however a slope ratio of 1.5: 1 may be used for slopes up to a maximum height of 6 feet. 6.7 Site Drainage Foundation and slab performance depends greatly on how well the runoff waters drain from the site. This is true both during construction and over the entire life of the structure. The ground surf ace around structures should be graded so that water flows rapidly away from the structures without ponding. The surf ace gradient needed to achieve this depends on the prevailing landscape. In general, we recommend that pavement and lawn areas within five feet of buildings slope away at gradients of at least two percent. Densely vegetated_ areas should have ·minimum gradients of at least five percent away from buildings in the first five feet. Densely vegetated areas are considered those in which the planting type and spacing is such that the flow of water is impeded. Planters should be built so that water from them will not seep into the foundation, slab, or pavement areas. Site irrigation should be limited to the minimum necessary to sustain landscaping plants. Should excessive irrigation, water line breaks, or unusually high rainfall occur, saturated zones or "perched" groundwater may develop_ in fill soils. Any subgrade portions of the site should have a back-drain constructed for exterior walls. C B Commercial Real Estate Group June 29, 1993 6.8 Foundation Recommendations Project No. 0113-001-00 Doc. #3-0205 Page 8 These recommendations are considered generally consistent with methods typically used in southern California. Other alternatives may be available. The foundation recommendations herein should not be considered to preclude more restrictive criteria of governing agencies or by the structural engineer. The design of the foundation system should be performed by the project structural engineer, incorporating the geotechnical parameters described in the following sections. 6.8.1 Foundation Design Criteria The following design criteria assumes that the recommended site preparation including moisture conditioning has been performed. Allowable Soil Bearing: Minimum Footing Width: Minimum Footing Depth: Minimum Reinforcement: 2,000 psf (allow a one-third increase for short-term wind or seismic loads) 24 inches below lowest adjacent soil grade Two no.5 bars at both top and bottom in continuous footings. Lateral loads against stru.ctures may be resisted by friction between the bottoms of footings or slabs and the supporting soil. A coefficient of friction of 0.25 is recommended. Alternatively, a passive pressure of 250 lbs/ft3 is recommended for the portion of vertical foundation members embedded into compacted fill. If friction and passive pressure are combined,· the passive pressure value should be reduced by one-third. Footings on slopes should be founded at a depth su~h that at th~ distance between the lower outside edge of the footing and the face of the slope is at least 12 feet. r-- ! C 8 Commercial Real Estate Group June 29, 1993 6.9 Seismic Design Project No. 0113-001-00 Doc. #3-0205 Page 9 The recommended site coefficient for use in seismic design is soil profile S1 and S-Factor 1.2 in accoraance with UBC criteria. This also corresponds to Soil Type 1 for normalized response spectra shapes. 6.10 Concrete On-Grade Slabs Slabs should be designed for the anticipated loading. If an elastic design is used, a modulus of subgrade reaction of 200 kips/ft3 should be suitable. As a minimum, slabs should be at least 5 inches in thickness and be reinforced with at least #3 bars on 12 inch centers, each way. 6.10.1 Moisture Protection for Slabs Concrete slabs resting on soil ultimately cause the moisture content of the underlying soils to rise. This results from continued capillary rise and the ending of normal evapotranspiration. As concrete is permeable, moisture. will eventually penetrate the slab unless some protection is provided. To decrease the likelihood of problems related to damp slabs, suitable moisture protection measures should be used where moisture sensitive floor coverings or other factors warrant. A commonly used moisture protection consists of about four inches of clean sand covered by 'visqueen' plastic sheeting. In addition, two inches of sand are placed over the plastic to decrease concrete curing problems associated with placing concrete directly on an impermeable membrane. It has been our experience that such systems will transmit from approximately 6 to 12 pounds of moisture per 1000 square feet per day. This may be excessive for some applications. If more protection is needed, we recommend that the slab be underlain by at least 6-inches of minus 3/4-inch crushe~ rock, with no plastic membrane. In addition, concrete with a higher cement content and a low slu~p should used to. On-site quality control should be used ito confirm the design conditions. C B Commercial Real Estate Group June 29, 1993 6.11 Reactive Soils Project No. 0113-001-00 Doc. #3-0205 Page 10 Sulfate content of the on-site soil indicates that Type II cement be used in all concrete which will be in contact with soil. The pH arid resistivity \'.alues of on-site soil are shown in Appendix C, and may be utilized in the design life of buried metal structures. 6.12 Earth Retaining Structures Cantilever retaining walls should be designed for an active earth pressure approximated by an equivalent fluid pressure of 50 lbs/ft3• The active pressure should be used for walls free to yield at the top at least 0.1 percent of the wall height. For walls restrained so that such movement is not permitted, an equivalent fluid pressure of 75 lbs/ft3 should be used, based on at-rest soil conditions. The above pressures do not consider any sloping backfill, surcharge loads, or hydrostatic pressures. If these are aP.plicable, they _will increase the lateral pressures on the wall and we should be contacted for additional recommendations. Walls should be fully back-drained to relieve any hydrostatic pressure and to decrease moisture permeation. The above lateral pressures assume the use of the on-site clays as backfill. Recognizing that these pressures are high, reduced pressures can be realized by using an imported granular soil in the backfill zone defined by a 1: 1 plane back from the wall footing. Typical active pressures for a nonexpansive sand would be 35 pcf, and typical at-rest pressures would be 55 pcf. Actual pressures should be provided after a review of the imported soil to be used. Retaining wall backfill should be compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction, _based on ASTM D1557. Backfill should not be placed until walls have achieved adequate structural strength. Heavy compaction equipment which could cause distress to walls should not be used. 6.13 Pavements Two traffic types are assumed: areas of light traffic and passenger car parking (Traffic Index = 4.0), and access drives and truck routes (Traffic Index = 5.5). The project civil engineer review these values to determine if they are appropriate. An R-Value of 5 was assumed, based on the high expansion potential and grain size analysis of on-site soils. Based on these assumptions, our analysis indicates that a minimum section of 3-inches of asphalt concrete over 6.5-inches of aggregate base should be suitable for light traffic ! ~ I ' C B Commercial Real Estate Group June 29, 1993 Project No. 0113-001-00 Doc. #3-0205 Page 11 areas. Three inches of asphalt concrete over 11.5-inches of aggregate base is recommended for truck routes. The upper 12 inches of the pavement subgrade should be scarified, brought to about optimum moisture content, and compacted to at least 95 percent of maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D1557. Aggregate base should conform to CAL TRANS specifications and should be compacted to at least 95 percent of ASTM D1557. 7.0 LIMITATIONS OF INVESTIGATION This investigation was performed using the degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable geotechnical consultants practicing in this or similar localities. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the conclusions and professional opinions included in. this report. The samples taken and used for testing and the observations made are believed representative of the project site; however, soil and geologic conditions can vary significantly between borings. As in most projects, conditions revealed by excavation may be at variance with preliminary findings. If this occurs, the changed conditions must be evaluated by the geotechnical consultant and additional recommendations made, if warranted. This report is issued with the understanding· that it is· the responsibility of the owner, or of his representative, to ensure that the information and recommendations contained herein are brought to the attention of the necessary design consultants for the project and incorporated into the . plans, and the necessary steps are taken to see that the contractors carry out such recommenda- tions in the field. The findings of this report are valid as of the present date. However, changes in the condition of a property can occur with the passage of time, whether due to natural processes or the work of man on this or adjacent properties. In addition, changes· in applicable or appropriate standards of practice may occur from legislation or the broadening of knowledge. Accordingly, the findings of this report may be invalidated wholly or partially by chang·es outside our control. Therefore, this report is subject to review and should not be relied upon after a period of three years. *** . r- r- ,-. ! i C B Commercial Real Estate Group June 29, 1993 GEOTECHNICS INCORPORATED ~/.d.,e,3/'------ Anthony F. Belfast, P.E.40333 Principal Project No. 0113-001-00 Doc. #3-0205 Page 12 Kenneth W. Shaw, C.E.G.1251 Project Geologist ,........ ' ' ~eotechnics· lncorpo~ated -- June 29, 1993 CB Commercial Real Estate Group 5130 Avenida Encinas Carlsbad, California 92008 ATTENTION: Mr. Doug Simpson SUBJECT: REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Proposed Commercial Buildings Gentlemen: 2300, 2304, and 2308 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad Research Center Carlsbad, California Principals: Anthony F. Belfast Michael P. Imbriglio W. Lee Vanderhurst Project No. 0113-001-00 Doc-. #3-0205 The following report presents the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of our geotechnical investigation of the subject site. Our investigation encompassed three commercial building sites with surrounding parking areas. In general, our findings indicate that the subject site is underlain by a variable thickness of fill overlying bedrock of the Point Loma Formation. No geotechnical conditions were apparent which would preclude the planned development of the lots. The major geotechnical factors that will impact the proposed development are the high expansion potential of the fill and bedrock materials, and the weathered condition of the surface soils. Such conditions are common to _San Diego County. Recommendations are provided herein to mitigate these conditions. 1.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF WORK The purpose of our investigation was to evaluate the existing geologic conditions at the site as they relate to the proposed improvements, and to make recommendations relating to the geotechnical aspects of project design. The recommendations contained herein are based on background research, a surface reconnaissance, subsurface exploration, laboratory testing, and professional experience in the general site area. Design values may include presumptive parameters based on professional judgement. Our scope 9f work was limited to: P.O. Box 26500-224 • San Diego California • 92196 Phone (619) 536-1000 • Fax (619) 536-8311 ,-- 1 I I r I C B Commercial Real Estate Group June 29, 1993 Project No. 0113-001-00 Doc. #3-0205 Page 2 1. 1 Review of available literature related to general geotechnical conditions. We were provided with a site plan prepared by Group One architects (SO-scale) and descriptions of the project. 1.2 A visual reconnaissance of the site, excavation of four exploration borings, and collection of soil samples to be used for laboratory testing. 1.3 Laboratory testing of selected soil samples to aid in evaluating strength properties, expansive potential, reactivity, and to classify the soil. 1.4 Engineering analysis of the conditions encountered to development recommendations for site preparation, foundation design, on-grade slabs, and earth retaining structures and pavements. 1.5 Assessment of general seismic conditions and geologic hazards affecting the area, and their likely impact on the project. 1.6 Preparation of this report. 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION The site consists of a relatively flat graded, vacant lot located north of Faraday Avenue. The lot is bound to the east, west and south by developed commercial/industrial buildings and parking lots. The northern boundary borders an ungraded natural area that slopes moderately to the north. Elevations of the graded pad are not shown on the site plan, however, they are assumed to reflect the sheet graded elevations of the Carlsbad Research Center (CRC) mass grading that took place over 10 years ago. Evidence of underground utility lines .and street lights were observed within the site. Grasses and weeds cover the site, with some minor amounts of trash and building materials. Prior to grading approximately 10 years ago, the building site consisted of a relatively flat ridge, with adjacent descending canyons to the north-east and north-west. The referenced mass grading plans indicate that a cut/fill line parallels the north limits of grading, and passes through ·r ! I j I ! C B Commercial Real Estate Group June 29, 1993 Project No. 0113-001-00 Doc. #3-0205 Page 3 the northern two proposed buildings, however, these lines generally shift during grading and are affected by the removal depth of unsuitable soils. 3.0 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The proposed development will consist of three, one to two story, concrete tilt-up structures. There were no specific building plans available at the time of our investigation. The approximate locations of the proposed buildings are shown on the Site Plan (Plate 1). The base map used for our site plan was prepared by Group One architects. The buildings will be surrounded by asphalt-concrete paved parking lots. Minor grading may be required to adjust building pad and parking lot grades. The anticipated loads for the structures will be typical for one to two story tilt- up construction. 4.0 GEOLOGY AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS The geology and subsurface conditions were evaluated by reviewing available documents pertinent to the site, and by drilling 4 borings. The borings were drilled with an 8-inch diameter hollow-stem continuous flight auger drill rig. The maximum depth drilled was 32 feet below existing grade. Our borings indicate that a variable thickness of fill overlies the Point Loma Formation Bedrock, of approximately 4 to 6½ feet. The approximate location of the borings is shown on Plate 1, Site Plan. The logs of the borings are presented in Appendix B. A description of the specific units observed follows. 4.1 Point Loma Formation The Point Loma Formation is typically characterized as an olive green-grey silty clay, that is massive· to thickly bedded, and poorly to moderately cemented with local gypsum seams. As encountered in the borings, the clay consisted of lean silty clay (CL). The ' Point Loma Formation exhibits low plasticity, is very dense, and is highly expansive. ,-- ,-- ' ' I ,-- r APPENDIX A REFERENCES Algermissen, S. T., Perkins, D. M., Thenhaus, P. C., Hanson, S. L., and Bender, 8. L., 1982, Probabilistic Estimates of Maximum Acceleration and Velocity in Rock in the Contiguous United States: U. S. Geological Survey Open-file Report 82-1033, 99 p. American Society for Testing and Materials, 1992, Annual Book of ASTM Standards. Section 4. Construction. Volume 04.08 Soil and Rock: Dimension Stone: Geosynthetics, ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, 1296 p. Bowles, J. E., 1982, Foundation Analysis and Design, 3rd ed.: New York, McGraw Hill, 816 p. California Division of Mines and Geology, 1975, Recommended Guidelines for Determining the Maximum Credible and the Maximum Probable Earthquakes: California Division of Mines and Geology Notes, Number 43. Jennings, C. W., 1975, Fault Map of California: California Division of Mines and Geology, California, Geologic Data Map Series. Kennedy, M. P., and Peterson, G. L., 1975, Geology of San Metropolitan Area, California: California Division of Mines and Geology Bulletin 200, 56 p. Ploessel, M. R., and Slosson, J. E., 1974, Repeatable High Ground Accelerations for · Earthquakes: California Geology, v. 27, no. 9, p. 195-199. Rick Engineering Company, 1981, "Grading Plans for Carlsbad Tract No. 81-10, Carlsbad Research Center", Sheet 11 of 13, Drawing No. 212-SA · Spangler, M. G., and Handy, R. L., 1982, Soil Engineering, 4th ed.: New York, Harper & Row, 819 p. Wilson, K. L., 1972, Eocene and Related Geology of a Portion of the San Luis Rey and Encinitas Quadrangles, San Diego County, California: M .. A. Thesis (unpublished), U. C. Riverside r- ' r-t APPENDIX B FIELD EXPLORATION Field exploration consisted of a visual reconnaissance of the site and subsurface exploration. Four borings were drilled using a truck mounted 8-inch diameter hollow stem, continuous flight auger. The borings were advanced to a maximum depth of 32 feet. The approximate locations of the borings are shown on Plate 1. Logs describing the subsurface conditions encountered are presented in the Figures of Appendix B. Samples were collected using a standard 1.5-inch (internal diameter), split-tube drive sampler. The drive weight for samples collected during drilling with the hollow stem auger was a 140-pound hammer with a free fall of 30 inches. For each sample we recorded the number of blows needed to drive the sampler 6, 12, and 18 inches. The number of blows needed to drive the final 12 inches is shown on the attached logs under "blows per ft." Bulk samples were also obtained from auger cuttings at selected intervals. Borings were located by estimating using plans provided by Group One. The locations shown should not be considered more accurate than is implied by the method of measurement used. The lines designating the interface between soil and rock material on the boring logs are determined by interpolation and are therefore approximations. The transition between the materials may be abrupt or gradual. Further, soil conditions at locations between the borings may be substantially different from those at the specific locations explored. It should be recognized that the passage of time can result in changes in the soil conditions reported in our logs. LOG OF EXPLORATION BORING NO. 1 Logged by KWS Date: 6/9/93 Method of Dri@J 8 Inch Hollow Stem Auger Elevation: Exist. Grd . i=' ..: w w u:-';F. LI. ..J ..J 0 w 0: Q. Q. w w :E :E e:. I:. w < 0: Q. < ~ ::, DESCRIPTION LAB TESTS :c Cl) Cl) Cl) ... ... :: w li&: u; Cl) Q. ~ ..J z 0 w 0 0: ::, w :E Q ..J Q a) Q a) 1 FILL: Lean silty clay (CL-ML) low plasticity, oUve green-grey, moist, firm to hard, mottled colors 2 3 23 mm 23 Spt ,--4 llilli ! 5 .. . . "'""" Grain Size :::::-:::,: 6 ~ Atterberg Expansion f nm POINT LOMA FORMATION: Lean silty clay (CL-ML) low plasticity, olive green-grey, 8 74 Sp! 20 moist, hard to very hard, becomes moderately cemented at 25 feet . ,-- 9 llllJj 10 11. 12 13 64 IIlll1 Sp! 14 lllilJ 15 16 .-17 18 82/ Sp! 10" 19 20 21 22 23 ' 24 : 25 At 25 feet, slow drilling 26 27 28 ITillIT 92 Sp! Gypsum seams in sample 29 llilli 30 At 31.5 feet, very hard drilling _.,.. ,otal Depth :,1. Feet, No water, No caving ,--PROJECT NO. 0113-001-00 GEOTECHNICS INCORPORATED FIGURE: B-1 Logged by KWS Method of Drillin ~ ..: w w u:-~ .J .J (.) w a: Q. Q. w :E :E e:. !:. w < Q. < ~ :i: Cl) Cl) Cl) I-3: w ~ Cl) Q. 0 i? .J z w c:: ::> w Q .J Q Ill Q Ill 1 2 illl1f 3 17 Spt 4' u 5 6 7 8 49 ~ 1lllli 9 10 11 12 70/ 13 r Spt 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 LOG OF EXPLORATION BORING NO. 2 8 Inch Hollow Stem Auger Date: 6/9/93 Elevation: Exist. Grd • ~ . w a: ~ Cl) 0 :E DESCRIPTION FILL: Lean silty clay (CL-ML) low plasticity, olive green-grey, moist, firm to hard POINT LOMA FORMATION: Lean silty clay (CL-ML) low plasticity, olive green-grey, moist, hard to very hard, homogenous At 13 feet drilling refusal on cemented bedrock Total Depth 13 Feet, No Water, No Caving LAB TESTS PROJECT NO. 0113-001-00 GEOTECHNICS INCORPORATED FIGURE: B-2 r I I LOG OF EXPLORATION BORING NO. 3 Logged by KWS Date: 6/9/93 Method of DrilUn-8 Inch Hollow Stem Auger Elevation: Exist. Grd • r=-..: w w u::-:J' u. -' -' t.) w IX 0. 0. !:. w w ::E ::E ~ w < 0:: 0. < f: :::, DESCRIPTION LAB TESTS i= I Cl) Cl) ... w iii:: Cl) Cl) 0. g ~ -' z i5 w IX :::, w ::E C al C al C 1 FILL: Lean silty clay (CL-ML) low plasticity, olive green-grey, with slight orange stains, moist, firm to hard 2 3 11 't 13 Expansion _p -l!1llll :: Sulfate 4 pH @ Resistivity 5 6 POINT LOMA FORMATION: Lean silty clay (CL-ML) low plasticity, olive green-grey, with orange staining, moist, hard to very hard, homogenous 7 8 67 Sp! 23 9 10 At 10.5 feet hard drilling on cemented bedrock 11· 12 13 93 ~m 1111111 14 Total Depth 13.5 Feet, No Water, No Caving 15 16 17 18 19 20 . 21 22 ' 23 24 I 25 26 27 28 29 30 PROJECT NO. 0113-001-00 GEOTECHNICS INCORPORATED FIGURE: B-3 Logged by KWS Method of Drillin i=-~ LLI LLI ii:" LI. ..J ..J 0 w a:: Q. Q. e:. LLI w :E :E ~ Q. ct ct ~ :z:: ~ C/) C/) I-LLI ll::: ci> Q. 0 ~ ..J z w ii:: ::, w C ..J C m C m 1 2 1llIT 3 14 Spt 4 !llli1l 5 6 7 8 71 llll11 Spt 9 lllll 10 11 12 1llIT 13 91 Spt lllil 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 LOG OF EXPLORATION BORING NO. 4 8 Inch Hollow Stem Auger Date: 6/9/93 Elevation: Exist. Grd. ~ LLI a:: ::, I-C/) 0 :E -DESCRIPTION FILL: Lean silty clay (CL-ML) low plasticity, olive green-grey with orange staining, moist, firm to hard, with asphalt fragments In fill POINT LOMA FORMATION: Lean sllty clay (CL-ML) low plasticity, olive green-grey, with orange staining, moist, hard to very hard, homogenous Total Depth 13.5 Feet, No Water, No Caving LAB TESTS PROJECT NO. 0113-001-00 GEOTECHNICS INCORPORATED FIGURE: 8-4 ,....... I ,-- r-i ' APPENDIX C LABORATORY TESTING Selected representative samples of soils encountered were tested using test methods of the American Society for Testing and Materials, or other generally accepted standards. A brief description of the tests performed follows: Classification: Soils were classified visually according to the Unified Soil Classification System. Visual classification was supplemented by laboratory testing of selected samples and clas- sification in accordance with ASTM 02487. The soil classifications are sh~wn on the Boring Logs. Expansion Index: The expansion potential of selected soils was characterized by using the test method ASTM D 4829. Figure C-3 provides the results of the tests. Particle Size Analysis: Particle size analysis were performed in accordance with ASTM 0422. Th~ results are provided on the following Figure C-1. Sulfate Content: To assess their potential for reactivity with concre!e, a representative sample was tested for c;ontent of water.,soluble sulfate minerals using CAL TRANS method 417 (Part I). The results are listed in Figure C-2. pH and Resistivity: To assess their potential for reactivity with metal pipe, a representative sample was tested for pH and resistivity, using California Test Method 643. The results are listed in Figure· C-2. In-Situ Moisture: The in-place moisture content of selected samples were determined using standard penetration samples recovered from the drilling. The moisture contents are shown on the Bor!ng Logs. . -· · 1 . l "l ·r U.S. Standard Sieve Opening in Inches U.S. Stenderd Sieve Numbers Hydrometer 100 6 4 3 2 1½ 1 ¾ ½3/8 3 4 6 8·101416 20 30 40 50 70 100140 200 .c C, 90 I 80 ) n 70 -~ 60 ~ > m ~ 50 £ IL i: ~ 40 ~ .. IL 30 20 10 0500 EXPLORATION NUMBER B1@5' I Cobbles ELEVATION OR DEPTH I II I I 1~11 11 I I I I II I I • "" r-.. -.... r-... ~ -~ ' 1-,_ i--.- i I I ! I I ' I 100 50 10 5 1 0.6 Grain Size in Millimeters Gravel I Send C::.oer~_L_____F ine j Coersl! I Medium PLOT UNIFIED SOIL SYMBO CLASSIFICATION CL Fine sandy CLAY GEOTECHNICS INCORPORATED L PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS -. . I I I II -....... ""r-,. I"- ' • --I"-. ",, i ~ r,.., < ...._ 0.1 0.05 0.01 0.005 Slit or Cley SAMPLE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NOO 1 1 1 -n n 1 -n ... 0 - .. 1 0 2 3 • ! .. ., ! 0 0 j; .. -; 0 ~ > m 0 ~ • 0 0 .. C 0 .. 0 0 0 0 ~ II IL 1 00 0.001 PLASTICITY LL PL 46 19 FIGURF ,-, 1 .. ~ Pl 26 r; i ! . TITLE 24 REPORT FOR: CARLSBAD PRINTING SERVICE FARADAY BUSINESS PARK CARLSBAD I CA PROJECT DESIGNER: REPORT PREPARED BY: SLAYTON MECHANICAL CONT Slayton Mechanical Contractors, 10199 Riverford Rd "C" Lakeside, CA 92040 (619) 449-1272 Job Number: 10920 Date: 2/16/1998 Inc. The COMPLY 24 computer program has been used to perform the calculations summarized in this compliance report. This program has approval and is authorized by the California Energy Commission for use with both the Residential and Nonresidential Building Energy Efficiency Standards. ) Table Of Contents for Title 24 Report Cover Page 1 Table of Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Form ENV-1 Envelope Certificate of Compliance ....................... 3 Form ENV-2 Prescriptive Envelope Summary ............................ 5 Form ENV-3 Construction Assemblies 9 Form LTG-1 Lighting Certificate of Compliance ....................... 14 Form LTG-2 Prescriptive Lighting Compliance Summary ............ : · .... 16 Form LTG-3 Lighting Controls Credit Worksheet ....................... 17 Form MECH-1 Mechanical Certificate of Compliance .................... 18 Form MECH-2 Prescriptive Mechanical Summary ......................... 21 Form MECH-3 Mechanical Equipment Summary ............................ 24 -Form MECH-4 Mechanical Ventilation .................................. 25 } CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE -Envelope (part 1 of 2) Project Name: CARLSBAD PRINTING SERVICE ENV-1 page 3 of 25 Date: 2/16/1998 Address: FARADAY BUSINESS PARK- CARLSBAD, CA Envelope Building Permit No Designer: Documentation: Slayton Mechanical Contractors, Inc. Checked by/ Date COMPLY 24 User 4283 GENERAL INFORMATION Date of Plans: Building Type: Nonresidential Building Conditioned Floor Area: Climate Zone: 735 sf 7 Phase of Construction: 0 New Construction O Addition O Alteration Method of Envelope Compliance: Prescriptive -Overall Envelope STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE This Certificate of Compliance lists the Building features and performance specifications needed to comply with Title 24, Parts 1 and 6 of the Calif- ornia Code of Regulations. This certificate applies only to building envelope requirements. The documentation preparer hereby certifies that the documentation is accurate and complete. DOCUMENTATION AUTHOR SLAYTON MECHANICAL CONT (619) 449-1272 (Signature) (Date) The Principal Envelope Designer hereby certifies that the proposed build- ing design represented in this set of ·construction documents is consistent with the other compliance forms and worksheets, with the specifications, and with any other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed building has been designed to meet the envelope requirements contained in sections 110, 116 through 118, and 140, 142, 143 or 149 of Title 24, Part 6, Chapter 1. Please check one: 0 I hereby affirm that I am eligible under the provisions of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code to sign this document as the person responsible for its preparition; and that I am a civil engineer or architect. 0 I affirm that I am eligible under the exemption to Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code by Section 5537.2 of the Business and Professions Code to sign this document as the person responsible for its preparation; and that I am a licensed·contractor preparing docu- ments for work that I have contracted to perform. O I affirm that I am eligible under the exemption to Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code by Section ____ of the Code to sign this document as the person responsible for its preparation; and for the following reason: ---------------- PRINCIPAL ENVELOPE DESIGNER (Signature) (Lie. #) (Date) ENVELOPE MANDATORY MEASURES Indicate location on plans of Note Block for Mandatory Measures: ): CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE -Envelope (part 2 of 2) Project Name: CARLSBAD PRINTING SERVICE Documentation: Slayton Mechanical Contractors, Inc. Const OPAQUE SURFACES Assembly Name Type Location/Comments 7.25" CONCRETE WALL None R-13 Metal Stud Wall Metal R-19 OVER TILE None R-19 Floor(F.19.2x8.16) Wood Hollow Wood Door None FENESTRATION Frame Orient Panes Type Exterior Shade ----------------------------------------- Interior 1 Metal None Front (N) 1 Metal None OH N N ENV-1 page 4 of 25 Date: 2/16/1998 COMPLY 24 User 4283 Note to Field Glazing Type .. ----------------------- FORD ROYAL BLUE FORD ROYAL BLUE J OVERALL ENVELOPE METHOD (part 1 of 4) Project Name: CARLSBAD PRINTING SERVICE Documentation: Slayton Mechanical Contractors., Inc. WINDOW AREA TEST A. Display Perimeter 0.0 ft X 6 ft = B. Gross Exterior Wall Area 180.0 sf X 0.40 = C. Gross Exterior Wall Area 180.0 sf X 0.10 = D. Enter Larger of A or B E. Enter Proposed Window Area If Eis greater than Dor less than C, proceed to for window area adjustment. 1. If Eis greater than D: D. Maximum Standard Area N/A 2. If Eis less than C: C. Minimum Standard Area N/A SKYLIGHT AREA TEST If not, go to part I I E. Proposed Area N/A E. Proposed Area N/A 2 = = ENV-2 page 5 of 25 Date: 2/16/1998 COMPLY 24 User 4283 0.0 sf Display Area 72.0 sf 40% Area 18.0 sf Min Std Area 72.0 sf Max Std Area 60.0 sf Proposed Area the next calculation of 4. Window Adjustment Factor N/A Window Adjustment Factor N/A - Atrium Height 0.0 ft If Height< 55 ft Standard= 5% ----------+----------If Height>= 55 ft Standard= 10% 1 V A. Gross Exterior Roof Area 735.0 sf X 0.05 = 36.8 sf Standard Area B. Enter Proposed Skylight Area 0.0 sf Proposed Area If the Proposed Skylight Area is greater than the Standard Skylight Area, proceed to the next calculation for the skylight area adjustment. If not got to part 2 of 4. 1. If Proposed Skylight Area> Standard Skylight Area: Standard Skylight Area N/A I Proposed Skylight Area N/A = Skylight Adjustment Factor N/A t 'j. OVERALL ENVELOPE METHOD (part 2 of 4) Project Name: CARLSBAD PRINTING SERVICE Documentation: Slayton Mechanical Contractor~, Inc. OVERALL HEAT LOSS PROPOSED Assembly Name Area HC U-Val UxA ---------------------------------------- 7.25" CONCRETE WALL 120.0 16.9 0.699 83.9 R-19 OVER TILE 735.0 0.5 0.044 32.5 FORD ROYAL BLUE 24.0 N/A 1.010 24.2 FORD ROYAL BLUE 24.0 N/A 1. 010 24.2 FORD ROYAL BLUE 12.0 N/A 1.010 12.1 ------ Total 177.0 ** OVERALL HEAT LOSS COMPLIES PROPOSED ENV-2 page 6 of 25 Date: 2/16/1998 COMPLY 24 User 4283 Adj. STANDARD Area U-Val UxA ----------------- 120.0 0.690 82.8 735.0 0.078 57.3 24.0 1.230 29.5 24.0 1.230 29.5 12.0 1.230 14.8 ------ Total 213.9 UA <= STANDARD UA ** J OVERALL ENVELOPE METHOD (part 3 of 4) Project Name: CARLSBAD PRINTING SERVICE Documentation: Slayton Mechanical Contractors,-Inc. ENV-2 page 7 of 25 Date: 2/16/1998 COMPLY 24 User 4283 -----·~-------------------------------------------------------------------- OVERALL HEAT GAIN Glazing North North North WF 0.34 0.34 0.34 PROPOSED Area SC H 24.0 0.60 24.0 0.60 12.0 0.60 ** OVERALL HEAT GAIN COMPLIES V STANDARD OHF Total Area RSHG Total ------------------- 4.9 24.0 0.94 7.7 4.9 24.0 0.94 7.7 2.4 12.0 0.94 3.8 ------------- Total 12.2 Total 19.2 PROPOSED HG<= STANDARD HG** OVERALL ENVELOPE METHOD (part 4 of 4) Project Name: CARLSBAD PRINTING SERVICE Documentation: Slayton Mechanical Contractors-, Inc. Window Area Adjustment Calculations Wall Name ZONE 1 NORTH Gross Dir Area N TOTALS 180.0 180.0 Skylight Area Adjustment Calculations Roof Name Gross Dir Area Door Area ------ ------ 0.0 Window Area ------ 60.0 ------ 60.0 Skylt Area ENV-2 page 8 of 25 Date: 2/16/1998 COMPLY 24 User 4283 Adjust Factor ------ 1.0000 Adjust Factor Adjusted Window Wall Area Area ------------ 60.0 120.0 ------------ 60.0 120.0 Adj'usted Skylt Roof Area Area ZONE l CEILING H TOTALS 735.0 735.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.0 0.0 735.0 735.0 1. J. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ASSEMBLY ENV-3 page 9 of 25 Project Name: CARLSBAD PRINTING SERVICE Documentation: Slayton Mechanical Contractors-, Inc. Date: 2/16/1998 COMPLY 24 User 4283 COMPONENT DESCRIPTION Sketch of Construction Assembly ASSEMBLY U-VALUE Construction Components Outside Air Film 1. Concrete, 140 lb, Not Dried 2. 3 . 4. 5. 6. 7. 8 • 9 . Inside Air Film ADJUSTMENT FOR FRAMING Assembly Name: 7.25" CONCRETE WALL Assembly Type: Wall Assembly Tilt: 90 deg (Vertical) Framing Material: None Framing Spacing: "O.C. Framing Percent: 0.0 ~ Absorptivity: 0.00 Roughness: Abort Th Fr (in) R-Value 7.250 Unadjusted R-Values Cavity Frame 0.17 0.58 0.68 1.43 0.17 0.58 0.68 1.43 (1 / 1.43) X (1.00) + (1 / 1.43) X (0.00) = 0.699 Weight: Heat Capacity: 84.6 lb/sqft 16.92 TOTAL U-VALUE = 0.699 ===== TOTAL R-VALUE = 1.43 ===== PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ASSEMBLY ENV-3 page 10 of : 1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Project Name: CARLSBAD PRINTING SERVICE Documentation: Slayton Mechanical Contractors, Inc. Date: 2/16/1998 COMPLY 24 User 428 COMPONENT DESCRIPTION Sketch of Construction Assembly ASSEMBLY U-VALUE Construction Components Outside Air Film 1. Stucco 2. Plywood 3. Insulation, Mineral Fiber, R-13 4. Gypsum or Plaster Board 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Inside Air Film Assembly Name: R-13 Metal Stud Wall Assembly Type: Wall Assembly Tilt: 90 deg (Vertical) Framing Material: Metal Framing Spacing: II 0.C. Framing Percent: 15.0 ~ Absorptivity: 0.70 Roughness: Stucco, Wood Shingles Th Fr (in) 0.875 0.438 * 3.500 0.500 Unadjusted R-Values R-Value Cavity Frame 0 .. 17 0.17 0.54 13 .. 00 0.45 0.68 15.02 0.17 0.17 0.54 13.0p 0.45 0.68 0.00 TOTAL U-VALUE = 0.182 ===== TOTAL R-VALUE = 5.49 ===== Weight: Heat Capacity: 12.0 lb/sqft 2.62 . ·: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ASSEMBLY Project Name: CARLSBAD PRINTING SERVICE Documentation: Slayton Mechanical Contractors-, Inc. ENV-3 page 11 of 25 Date: 2/16/1998 COMPLY 24 User 4283 COMPONENT DESCRIPTION Assembly Name: R-19 OVER TILE Assembly Type: Roof Assembly Tilt: 0 deg (Horizontal Roof) Sketch of Construction Assembly ASSEMBLY U-VALUE Framing Material: None Framing Spacing: "O.C. Framing Percent: 0.0 % Absorptivity: 0.00 Roughness: Abort Th Fr ( in) R-Value Construction Components Outside Air Film 1. Acoustical Tile, Interior Finish 2. Insulation, Mineral Fiber, R-19 3 • 4. 5. 6. 7. 8 • 9 . Inside Air Film Cavity Frame 0.17 1.000 2.86 6.000 19.00 0.17 2.86 19.00 Unadjusted R-Values 0.61 22.64 0.61 22.64 ADJUSTMENT FOR FRAMING (1 /22.64) X (1.00) + (1 /22.64) X (0.00) Weight: Heat Capacity: 1. 5 lb/sqft 0.45 0.044 TOTAL U-VALUE = 0.044 ===== TOTAL R-VALUE = 22.64 ===== PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ASSEMBLY Project Name: CARLSBAD PRINTING SERVICE Documentation: Slayton Mechanical Contractors-; Inc. ENV-3 page 12 of 25 Date: 2/16/1998 COMPLY 24 User 4283 COMPONENT DESCRIPTION Sketch of Construction Assembly ASSEMBLY U-VALUE Construction Components Outside Air Film 1. Insulation, Mineral Fiber, R-19 2. Plywood ' 3. Flooring, Carpet and Fibrous Pad 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Inside Air Film Assembly Name: R-19 Floor(F.19.2x8.16) Assembly Type: Floor Assembly Tilt: 180 deg (Horizontal Floor) Framing Material: Wood Framing Spacing: II 0.C. Framing Percent: 10.0 % Absorptivity: 0.70 Roughness: Stucco, Wood Shingles Th Fr (in) * 6.000 0.625 0.250 R-Value Cavity Frame 0.17 19.00 0.77 2.08 0.17 5.94 0.77 2.08 Unadjusted R-Values 0.92 22.95 0.92 9.89 ADJUSTMENT FOR FRAMING (1 /22.95) X (0.90) + (1 / 9.89) X (0.10) Weight: Heat Capacity: 3.9 lb/sqft 1.27 == 0.049 TOTAL U-VALUE = 0.049 ---------- TOTAL R-VALUE = 20.27 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ASSEMBLY Project Name: CARLSBAD PRINTING SERVICE Documentation: Slayton Mechanical Contractors-; Inc. ENV-3 page 13 of 25 Date: 2/16/1998 COMPLY 24 User 4283 COMPONENT DESCRIPTION Sketch of Construction Assembly ASSEMBLY U-VALUE Construction Components Outside Air Film 1. Softwood, Douglas Fir-Larch 2 . Air' Space 3. Softwood, Douglas Fir-Larch 4. 5. 6. 7. 8 . 9 . Inside Air Film ADJUSTMENT FOR FRAMING Assembly Name: Hollow Wood Door Assembly Type: Door Assembly Tilt: 90 deg (Vertical) Framing Material: None Framing Spacing: "O.C. Framing Percent: 0.0 % Absorptivity: 0.70 Roughness: Glass, Paint on Pine Th Fr (in) R-Value 0.125 1. 500 0.125 Unadjusted R-Values Cavity Frame 0.17 0.12 0.87 0.12 0.68 1. 97 0.17 0.12 0.87 0.12 0.68 1. 97 (1 / 1:.97) X (1.00} + (1 / 1.97) X (0.00) 0.508 Weight: Heat Capacity: 0.7 lb/sqft 0.28 TOTAL U-VALUE == 0.508 ===== TOTAL R-VALUE == 1.97 ===== \ CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE -Lighting (part 1 of 2) Project Name: CARLSBAD PRINTING SERVICE Address: FARADAY BUSINESS PARK CARLSBAD, CA Lighting Designer: Documentation: Slayton Mechanical Contractors, Inc. LTG-1 page 14 of 25 Date: 2/16/1998 Building Permit No Checked by/ Date COMPLY 24 User 4283 GENERAL INFORMATION Date of Plans: Building Conditioned Floor Area: 735 sf Building Type: Nonresidential Climate Zone: 7 Phase of Construction: 0 New Construction Method of Lighting Compliance: Prescriptive STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE O Addition 6-lteration This Certificate of Compliance lists the Building features and performance specifications needed to comply with Title 24, Parts 1 and 6 of the Calif- ornia Code of Regulations. This certificate applie's only to building lighting requirements. The documentation preparer hereby certifies that the documentation is accurate and complete. DOCUMENTATION AUTHOR SLAYTON MECHANICAL CONT (619) 449-1272 (Signature) GP 2,--/ {R,--l:j(J (Date) The Principal Lighting Designer hereby certifies that the proposed build- ing design represented in this set of construction documents is consistent with the other compliance forms and worksheets, with the specifications, and with any other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed building has been designed to meet the lighting requirements contained in sections 110, 119, 130 through 132 and 146 or 149. Please check one: 0 I hereby affirm that I am eligible under the provisions of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code to sign this document as the person responsible for its preparation; and that I am a civil engineer electrical engineer or architect. O I affirm that I am eligible under the exemption to Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code by Section 5537.2 of the Business and Professions Code to sign this document as the person responsible for its preparation; and that I am a licensed contractor preparing docu- ments for work that I have contracted to perform. O I affirm that I am eligible under the exemption to Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code by Section ____ of the Code to sign this document as the person responsible for its preparation; and for the following reason: ---------------- PRINCIPAL LIGHTING DESIGNER l • ' ). (Signature) (Lie. #) (Date) LIGHTING MANDATORY MEASURES Indicate location on plans of Note Block for Mandatory Measures: . '/ l \ CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE -Lighting (part 2 of 2) Project Name: CARLSBAD PRINTING SERVICE Documentation: Slayton Mechanical Contractorsi Inc. LTG-1 page 15 of 25 Date: 2/16/1998 COMPLY 24 User 4283 INSTALLED LIGHTING SCHEDULE No of Name Lamp Type Lamps ----------------------- A Fluorescent 3 MANDATORY AUTOMATIC CONTROLS Control Watts/ Ballast Ballasts/ Lamp Type Luminaire ------------------------- 34 Standard 1.5 Control Location ID Control Type Zone Controlled CONTROLS FOR CREDIT Control Control Location ID Control Type Zone Controlled Automatic Time SwZONE 1 No of Fixt. ----- 11 Note to Field ------- Note to Field Note to Field LIGHTING COMPLIANCE SUMMARY Project Name: CARLSBAD PRINTING SERVICE Documentation: Slayton Mechanical Contractors; Inc. LTG-2 page 16 of 25 Date: 2/16/1998 COMPLY 24 User 4283 ACTUAL LIGHTING POWER No of Watts Total Name Description Lumin per Default Watts A 48" T-12 Low Watt /3 Lamp (Tandem) 11 108.0 1188.0 SubTotal 1188 Less Control Credits (LTG-3) 59 Total Proposed Watts 1129 * If not CEC Default value, please provide supporting documentation. ALLOWED LIGHTING POWER BY ZONE Zone Name Occupancy Allowed Floor LPD Area (w/sf) Total Tailored (watts) (watts) ZONE 1 Comp Bldg Office 735 1.500 1103 0 TOTALS 735 1.500 1103 0 * Note: Tailored Allotment requires supporting documentation on form LTG-4. ·1 )l ). LIGHTING CONTROLS CREDIT WORKSHEET Project Name: CARLSBAD PRINTING SERVICE Documentation: Slayton Mechanical Contractors~ Inc. LIGHTING CONTROLS BY ZONE LTG-3 page 17 of 25 Date: 2/16/1998 COMPLY 24 User 4283 Floor Watts Adj. Control Zone Name Control Description Area Ctrld Fctr Credit ZONE 1 Automatic Time Switch 735 TOTAL 1188 0.050 59 59 ; , l )_ CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE -Mechanical (part 1 of 3) Project Name: CARLSBAD PRINTING SERVICE .Address: FARADAY BUSINESS PARK CARLSBAD, CA Mechanical Designer: Documentation: Slayton Mechanical Contractors, Inc. MECH-1 page 18 of 25 Date: 2/16/1998 Building Permit No Checked by/ Date COMPLY 24 User 4283 GENERAL INFORMATION Date of Plans: Building Conditioned Floor Area: 735 sf Building Type: Nonresidential Climate Zone: 7 Phase of Construction: O New Construction O Addition efAlteration Method of Mechanical Compliance: Prescriptive Proof of Envelope Compliance: O Previous Permit O Complianc·e· Attached STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE This Certificate of Compliance lists the Building features and performance specifications needed to comply with Title 24, Parts 1 and 6 of the Calif- ornia Code of Regulations. This certificate applies only to building mechanical requirements. The documentation preparer hereby certifies that the documentation is accurate and complete. DOCUMENTATION AUTHOR SLAYTON MECHANICAL CONT (619) 449-1272 (U (Signature) (Date) The=Principal Mechanical Designer hereby certifies that the proposed build- ing,design represented in this set of construction documents is consistent with the other compliance forms and worksheets, with the specifications, and with any other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed Building has been designed to meet the mechanical requirements contained in sections 110 through 115, 120 through 124, 140 through 142, 144 and 145. Please check one: O ,I hereby affirm that I am eligible under the provisions of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code to sign this document as the person responsible for its preparation; and that I am a civil engineer mechanical engineer or architect. /I affirm that I am eligible under the exemption to Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code by Section 5537.2 of the Business and Professions Code to sign this document as the person responsible for its preparation; and that I am a licensed contractor preparing docu- ments for work that I have contracted to perform. 0 I affirm that I am eligible under the exemption to Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code by Section ____ of the Code to sign this document as the person responsible for its preparation; and for the following reason: _______________ _ I II ) PRINCIPAL MECHANICAL DESIGNER (Signature) (Lie. #) (DatE . .: . -~:· . MECHANICAL MANDATORY MEASURES' Indicate location on plans of Note Block for Mandatory Measures: : · ... __ ··_:ij\·: t J' ). CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE -Mechanical (part 2 of 3) Project Name: CARLSBAD PRINTING SERVICE Documentation: Slayton Mechanical Contractorsi Inc. MECH-1 page 19 of 25 Date: 2/16/1998 COMPLY 24 User 4283 SYSTEM FEATURES Zone Name Time Control Setback Control #of Isolation Zones HP Thermostat Electric Heat Fan Control VAV Min Position Simul. Heat/Cool Heat Supply Reset Cool Supply Reset Ventilation OA Damper Control Economizer Type Outdoor Air CFM Heat Equip Type Make & Model No. Cool Equip Type Make and Model Zone Name Time Control Setback Control #of Isolation Zones HP Thermostat Electric Heat Fan Control VAV Min Position Simul. Heat/Cool Heat Supply Reset Cool Supply Reset Ventilation OA Damper Control Economizer Type Outdoor Air CFM Heat Equip Type Make & Model No. Cool Equip Type Make and Model Code Tables Time Control S:Prog Switch O:Occ Sensor M:Man Timer HP-1 None n/a Yes 0.0 KW Constant Volume n/a n/a Constant Temp Constant Temp No Economizer 110 Heat Pump ZONE 2 EXISTING OFFICE None n/a n/a n/a Constant Volume n/a n/a Constant Temp Constant Temp No Economizer 0 DAY & NIGHT 654BO36 DX Gas Furnace Undefined DX ZONE 3 WAREHOUSE None n/a n/a n/a Constant Volume n/a n/a Constant Temp Constant Temp No Economizer 0 Gas Furnace Undefined DX Ventilation B:Air Balance C:OA Cert. M:OA Measure D:Demand Cont N:Natural OA Damper A:Auto G:Gravity Note to Field l tt ). CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE -Mechanical (part 3 of 3) Project Name: CARLSBAD PRINTING SERVICE Documentation: Slayton Mechanical Contractors, Inc. DUCT INSULATION System Name Type Duct Location DAY & NIGHT 654BO36 Heating Ducts in Attic Cooling Ducts in Attic Undefined Heating Ducts in Attic Cooling Ducts in Attic Undefined Heating Ducts in Attic Cooling Ducts in Attic PIPE INSULATION Insul System Name Pipe Type Required Domestic Hot Water Undefined Undefined y I N y IN y I N NOTES TO FIELD -For Building Department Use Only MECH-1 page 20 of 25 Date: 2/16/1998 COMPLY 24 User 4283 Duct Tape Insul Note to Allowed R-Val Field ------------------- y I N 4.2 y I N 4.2 y I N 4.2 y I N 4.2 y I N 4.2 y I N 4.2 Note to Field ------- MECHANICAL SIZING AND FAN POWER Project Name: CARLSBAD PRINTING SERVICE Documentation: Slayton Mechanical Contractorsi Inc. MECH-2 page 21 of 25 Date: 2/16/1998 COMPLY 24 User 4283 SIZING AND EQUIPMENT SELECTION HVAC System Name: Heating System Name: Cooling System Name: System Multiplier: Peak Load Method: Relative Humidity: 1. DESIGN CONDITIONS FOR Carlsbad 2. SIZING Btu/hr ------- HP-1 DAY & NIGHT 654BO36 HEATING 38 F PEAK 1 COINCIDENT 50 % COOLING SENSIBLE LATENT 83 F 68 F Btu/hr -------- ZONES SERVED BY SYSTEM ZONE 1 PEAK (Jan 12am) 23726 (Aug 3pm) 25267 Btu/hr 10925 10925 TOTAL Zone LOAD Duct Gain$ & Losses: Ventilation: ( 110 CFM) Return Air Lighting Gain Supply/Return Fan Ga~n: TOTAL'SYSTEM LOAD 3. SELECTION A. Safety/Warmup Factor B. Maximum Adjusted Load C. Installed Equipment Capacity ------- 23726 2373 4042 0 ------- 30140 1.43 43101 14263 110 CFM) -------- 25267 2527 1308 0 0 -------- 29101 1. 21 35213 34221 1492 12417 0 If Line 3-C > Line 3-B, Explain: --------------------- FAN POWER CONSUMPTION Fan Description Supply Fan FAN POWER DEMAND No. Sys BHP Efficiency Motor Drive 1 X 0.50 / [0.70 X 1.00] Totals = Peak HP ----- 0.71 ----- 0.71 Conv Peak Fact Watts ----- X 746 = 533 ----- 533 533 watts/ 1200 cfm = 0.444 watts/cfm Supply CFM ------ 1200 ------ 1200 MECHANICAL SIZING AND FAN POWER Project Name: CARLSBAD PRINTING SERVICE Documentation: Slayton Mechanical Contractors, Inc. MECH-2 page 22 of 25 Date: 2/16/1998 COMPLY 24 User 4283 SIZING AND EQUIPMENT SELECTION HVAC System Name: Heating System Name: Cooling System Name: System Multiplier: Peak Load Method: Relative Humidity: 1. DESIGN CONDITIONS FOR Carlsbad 2. SIZING ZONES SERVED BY SYSTEM ZONE 2 PEAK (Jan 12am) TOTAL Zone LOAD Duct Gains & Losses: Ventilation: ( 112 CFM) Return Air Lighting Gain Supply/Return Fan Gain: TOTAL SYSTEM LOAD 3. SELECTION A. Safety/Warmup Factor B. Maximum Adjusted Load C. Installed Equipment Capacity Btu/hr ------- 0 ------- 0 0 -4582 0 ------- -4582 1.43 -6552 0 ZONE 2 EXISTING OFFICE Undefined HEATING 38 F PEAK (Aug 12am) 0 CFM) 1 COINCIDENT 50 % COOLING SENSIBLE LATENT 83 F Btu/hr -------- 0 -------- 0 0 0 0 0 -------- 0 1. 21 0 0 68 F Btu/hr 0 0 0 0 0 If Line 3-C > Line 3-B, Explain: ____________________ _ FAN POWER CONSUMPTION Fan Description No. Sys BHP Efficiency Motor Drive ----------- Totals Peak Conv Peak Supply HP Fact Watts CFM ---------------- ---------------- 0.00 0 0 FAN POWER DEMAND O watts/ 0 cfm = 0.000 watts/cfm MECHANICAL SIZING AND FAN POWER MECH-2 page 23 of 25 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Project Name: CARLSBAD PRINTING SERVICE Documentation: Slayton Mechanical Contractors, Inc. Date: 2/16/1998 COMPLY 24 User 4283 SIZING AND EQUIPMENT SELECTION HVAC System Name: Heating System Name: Cooling System Name: System Multiplier: Peak Load Method: Relative Humidity: 1. DESIGN CONDITIONS FOR Carlsbad 2. SIZING ZONES SERVED BY SYSTEM ZONE 3 PEAK (Jan 12am) TOTAL Zone LOAD Duct Gains & Losses: Ventilation: ( 238 CFM) Return Air Lighting Gain Supply/Return Fan Gain: TOTAL SYSTEM LOAD 3. SELECTION A. Safety/Warmup Factor B. Maximum Adjusted Load C. Installed Equipment Capacity If Line 3-C > Line 3-B, Explain: FAN POWER CONSUMPTION Fan Description No. Sys BHP ZONE 3 WAREHOUSE Undefined Btu/hr ------- 0 ------- 0 0 -9735 0 ------- . -9735 1.43 -13922 0 HEATING 38 F PEAK (Aug 12am) 0 CFM) 1 COINCIDENT 50 % COOLING SENSIBLE LATENT 83 F Btu/hr -------- 0 -------- 0 0 0 0 0 -------- 0 1.21 0 0 < 68 F Btu/hr 0 0 0 0 0 --------------------- Efficiency Peak Motor Drive HP Totals 0.00 Conv Fact Peak Supply Watts CFM ----------- ----------- 0 0 FAN POWER DEMAND 0 watts/ O cfm = 0.000 watts/cfm MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SUMMARY Project Name: CARLSBAD PRINTING SERVICE Documentation: Slayton Mechanical Contractorsi Inc. MECH-3 page 24 of 25 Date: 2/16/1998 COMPLY 24 User 4283 CENTRAL SYSTEM SUMMARY Sys No System Name System Type No Sys Economizer Type 1 DAY & NIGHT 654BO36 Packaged Heat Pu 1 No Economizer CENTRAL SYSTEM RATINGS Sys-------Heating----------------------------------Cooling----------- No Type Output Aux KW EFF Type Output Sensible EER SEER 1 Heat Pump 17400 0.0 6.60 DX CENTRAL FAN SUMMARY------------Supply Sys Fan 35600 35600 8.60 10.10 -----------Return Fan Mtr Drv Mtr Drv No Fan Type Motor Location CFM BHP Eff Eff CFM BHP Eff Eff ------ 1 Constant Volume Draw-Through 1200 0.50 ZONAL FAN SUMMARY Zone Name None BOILER SUMMARY System Name ----------------------- Std Gas 50 gal or Less ---------Zonal Fan Mtr No CFM BHP Eff AFUE /Rec System Type Eff ----------- DomesticHW 0.780 Drv Eff Rated Input ----- 40000 ---------------- 70 100 None -------Exhaust Fan ----- Mtr Drv No CFM BHP Eff Eff ----------- Stdby Volume Loss EF (gals) ---------------- 0.040 0.529 50 MECHANICAL VENTILATION Project Name: CARLSBAD PRINTING SERVICE Documentation: Slayton Mecha.nical Contractors,, Inc. VENTILATION SUMMARY BY ZONE Floor sqft Zone Name T Occupancy Area /Occ ------------------------------------------ ZONE 1 Comp Bldg Offi 735 100 MECH-4 page 25 of 25 Date: 2/16/1998 COMPLY 24 User 4283 Tran CFM Dsg Min sfer /Occ CFM CFM CFM ------ 15.0 110 110 0 ------ TOTALS 110 110 Tailored OA (T=*) requires supporting documentation on MECH-5, Tailored Ventilation and Process Loads Worksheet