HomeMy WebLinkAbout2304 FARADAY AVE; ; CB980527; PermitU4/U2/98 11:12
Page 1 of 1
B U I L D I N G P E R M I T Permit No: CB980527
Project No: A9800684
Development No:
Job Address: 2304 FARADAY AV
Permit Type: INDUSTRIAL TENANT
Parcel No: 212-061-37-00
Valuation: 20,800
IMPROVEMENT
Suite:
Lot#:
Occupancy Group: Reference#:
Description: ADD 800 SF TO EXIST MEZZANINE
: FOR OFFICE SPACE
760
5652 04/02/98 0001 Ol
C-PRMT
Construction Type:
Status:
Applied:
Apr/Issue:
Entered By:
931-1130
I ~INAL APP~OVAL-
1
fN.::,~ DATE#
lCLEARANCE ___ ======-
CITY OF CARLSBAD
2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161
02
1261 .. 00
NEW
ISSUED
02/19/98
04/02/98
RMA
PERMIT· APPLICATION
CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT
2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad CA 92009
(760) 438-1161
EST. VAL. -+f::r-+-1.;..,:.::'-""';__--rt-r-'T
Plan Ck. Deposit -----,,,......,,.--w.:,;,..,._
Vali,.SN:@dc~Y~.i ~~~~'d:B'-~a:.f:------'-
Date 254-00
,',,
Legal Description Lot No. Subdivision Name/Number Unit No. Phase No. Total # of units
Assessor's Parcel # Existing Use Proposed Use
.,.2/.2& 4, 1370 0
Name Address City State/Zip Telephone #
·4, __ _ ,,, , ,' ,._ " :~ " ,< y ; :.-:. ', ,.,,
Name City S.tate/Zip Telephone#
'£1; .. -cor11fM9toi'I .: t::'OMP.ANY,:NAME .
(Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: An City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its
issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law
[Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code] or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged
exemption., .l}ny violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars [$500]) • ..5~tJnJ/e LJ;,,r;r;y..c-f1a~ c;3<; &;r/4. i/.e(46g/p #$tJD 6r'/sb.d C,4-,'2ki9 <f'_j/~//sf lS
Name Address City State/Zip Telephone #
State License # ~...?,17-3 License Class /3 City Business License # /e,2 d ,< ..3 r6
tJ(/.o a.-d 9.,;t.oo ,y ~9'..:J.
Designer Name State/Zip Telephone
State License # / o/ :J, 7 7
'~: -WOfl!{~RS; COAAPEt,is'AftciN .. -· . . . ., ... -~. -· -: -;-~~--: .. ·., ,. .. .,; .. :::·~·~--_:-:_·: -:~: ::;.~::::.~.---::::,~.:.~ .-:·"'
Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations:
D I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance
of the work for which this permit is issued. J8(_ I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is
issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are:
Insurance Company s~ 4.,zd Policy No,d.l)..'1--'f d: cv,,!f 0()/(.,W7 Expiration Date /-/--99
(THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($100] OR LESS)
D CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as
to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California.
I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor' License Law for the following reason:
0 I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale
(Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does
such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is
sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for. the purpose of sale).
0 I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The
Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed
pursuant to the Contractor's License Law).
0 I am exempt under Section ______ Business and Professions Code for this reason:
1. I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. D YES ONO
2. I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work.
3. I have contracted _with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number):
4. I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone
numper / contractors license number):. _____________________________________________ _
5. I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type
of work):. __________________________________________ '----------------
Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention
program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? D YES D NO
Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? 0 YES O NO
Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? 0 YES O NO
IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE
REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT.
'.if.~---~Q~~1'i%491:fq}r(!NPlNG.~¢tN§Y ... ·, _ · ,-, ___ . _________ ,· -: .. : :..:.-:..'.-~.-, _ :;;,. . , ... ?,:----0 -
1 hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097(i) Civil Code).
I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all
City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the Cit~ of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned
property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES,
JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT.
OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height.
EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the Building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or
work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 365 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended
or abandoned at any time after the rk is commenced for a period of 180 days (Section 106.4.4 Uniform Building Code).
DATE --=-tf2_.___,-('_7-'---__._7'..,._f __ _
PINK: Finance
04/02/98 11:08
Page 1 of 1
S E W E R P E R M I T
Permit No: SE980035
Bldg PlanCk#: CB980527
Job Address: 2304 FARADAY AV
Permit Type: SEWER -OFFICE/WAREHOUSE
Parcel No: 212-061-37-00
Suite: 5652 04/02/98 0001 01 02
Description: ADD 800 SF TO EXIST MEZZANINE
: FOR OFFICE SPACE
Permitee: WHITE CONSTRUCTION 760 931-1130
6351 CORTE DEL ABETO STE A-100
CARLSBAD CA 92009
C-PRMT 12·.U • 00
Status: PENDING
Applied: 03/05/98
Apr/Issue:
Expired:
Prepared By: DR
---~------==----~----------l FINAL APPR0VAL
INSP.·-·-· DA1 ·-··· __ _
·;CLEARANCE _____ _
l-~
CITY OF CARLSBAD
2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161
City of Carlsbad Inspection Request
For: 1 /18/99
Permit# CB980527
Title: ADD 800 SF TO EXIST MEZZANINE
Description: FOR OFFICE SPACE
Type: ITI Sub Type:
Job Address: 2304 FARADAY AV
Suite: Lot
Location:
APPLICANT : WHITE CONSTRUCTION
Owner: SIMPSON FAMILY TRUST 03-30-94
Remarks: EXTENSION 10
Total Time:
CD Description
19 Final Structural
29 Final Plumbing
39 Final Electrical
49 Final Mechanical
Inspector Assignment: TP ---
Phone: 7609311130
Inspector: L
Requested By: DEE
Entered By: CHRISTINE
Act Comments
_/j_{!_ ________ _
±--
*
UNSCHEDirr,ED BWJ,DING INSPECTION
DATE ___ ./+-M/4~f..-11/,,__·_
l l ri;l-INSPECTOR ........ ~--· _____ _
PERMIT# 1t-.£"2--'7 PLAN CHECK# ------
JOB ADDRESS Z 'so/,,/ ;e;g~Y.J~~ w.°
DESCRIPTION _______________________ _
TIME ARRIVE: ____ _
CODE DESCRIPTION ACT CO:MMENTS
/IJ
/4;;"'/~~../-/~ /.F, x Pt-JIL-/ 4',,-~-~:,IA-.,,,rf /JM,,.f5 ,,fa;e~t u
A/'l4,,:J: /2~-rvrL-,.._) v~r.Jtf-/L -z_~ ~t,lf_ t;~~/ t,,(,,,--,c/l,(44 /2~v,~
-/b J2..e.-~~~,4.,v/t-4-,/!'\./ e t-JJ"JvL ut:1t1£-j
12/02/98 . '
DATE
07/06/98
07/02/98
07/02/98
07/02/98
07/02/98
06/09/98
06/09/98
06/08/98
06/08/98
06/03/98
06/03/98
06/02/98
06/02/98
06/02/98
06/02/98
06/02/98
06/02/98
05/14/98
05/06/98
05/06/98
04/27/98
04/24/98
04/24/98
04/24/98
04/09/98
INSPECTION HISTORY LISTING
FOR PERMIT# CB980527
INSPECTION TYPE INSP ACT COMMENTS
Final Combo RI
Interior Lath/Drywall TP
Interior Lath/Drywall TP
Final Combo TP
Final Combo RI
Final Combo RI
Final Combo TP
Final Combo RI
Final Combo TP
Rough Combo RI
Rough Combo TP
Frame/Steel/Bolting/We! TP
Interior Lath/Drywall TP
Rough/Topout TP
Rough Electric TP
Rough/Ducts/Dampers TP
Rough Combo RI
Interior Lath/Drywall TP
Frame/Steel/Bolting/We! TP
Rough Electric TP
Frame/Steel/Bolting/Wel TP
Shear Panels/HD's TP
Frame/Steel/Bolting/We! TP
Rough Combo TP
Ftg/Foundation/Piers TP
RI C/WHITE CONST/931-1130
PA 1 HR WALL@ ROOF PRINT AREA
PA 1 HR WALLS TO ROOF OFFICE 2ND
WC
RI C/
RI C/DEBBIE/931-1130 EX 10
NR
RI C/WHITE CONST/931-1130
NR 1 HR WALL NOT PER PLN
RI C/VICKIE/931-1130 EX 10
NS SEE 6/2
AP T-BAR GRID 2ND FLR
CO 1 HR WALL TO EXTND TO ROOF SHT
WC
AP CEIL LITES 2ND FLR
AP DUCTS 2ND FLR
RI C/VICKIE/931-1130 EX 10
AP
AP SHR REV ATTCH
AP
AP 2ND FLR SHTING & SILL PLT NAIL
CO SHR TRANS TJl, TIGHT BOLTS
AP LEDGER BOLT ATTCHMNT
WC
AP LTR FOR DOWELS ATTCH
HIT <RETURN> TO CONTINUE ••.
FINAL BUILDING I~SPECTION
DEPT: BUILDING ENGINEERING F~, PLANNING CMWD ST LITE
PLAN CHECK#: CB980527
PERMIT#: CB980527
PROJECT NAME: ADD 800 SF TO EXIST MEZZANINE
FOR OFFICE SPACE
ADDRESS: 2304 FARADAY AV
CONTACT PERSON/PHONE#: C/WHITE CONST/931-1130
SEWER DIST: CA WATER DIST: CA
INSPECTEQ
BY: {f'\, I\ A
f
INSPECTED
BY:
INSPECTED
BY:
COMMENTS:
DATE
INSPECTED:
DATE
INSPECTED:
DATE
INSPECTED:
APPROVED
APPROVED
APPROVED
DATE: 06/08/98
PERMIT TYPE: ITI
{ --: 1 ;-,=~--'r' -::--\ ,: '
''
, i , JUN .-8 1998 i . '} l' I / !
I
I=""
DISAPPROVED
DISAPPROVED
DISAPPROVED
~,. ~.' . '
CARL SCHMIDT ·
REGISTERED SPECIAL INSPECTOR
3880 Adams Street ·
Carlsbad. CA 92008
Phone (619) 729-9618
SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT
PROJECT:C..-P-~.
ADDRESS: 2.. ~ c<-\ r'A-IR..-.-. OA"'i
PERMIT NUMBER: 9a-os ~,
PLAN FILE NUMBER:
MATERIAL TYPE, GRADE, SOURCE:
Inspection Date
FILE:
REPORT DATE: '-l-P-'f;--
Report
Building Number Performed E-ip~.x.'t 'l'r:::.,\po...,--Inspection.
Location and extent of work inspected include:
. I.."sFc.,--tc_J__ >l("' d.r~U~J ho\e s fuv-epo;<,l ~A~-tc-\lc..:,-\-1~V\ ~-----
-# L{ re-1o4,,,-. }-,k> J e... si 2--e-I .S 'it 11
X (_, '/ ~ f\ ~ ~-<::'..,V d_ (:_, +-c-. t \ \ \ A-/ A-t{ ,
Lo c:.dc," ..._ \,\.)A_ s ~{ 1 ':J ~,r i'Yl.<GU A-A (" .,__ ,
WORK INSPECTED CONFORMS WITH APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED
Inspection performed by: Phil Porter
~·.
Signature of Special Inspector
} cc:
618
Certification #
3
CARL SCHMIDT
REGISTERED SPECIAL INSPECTOR
3880 Adams Street
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Phone (619) 855-9252
SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT
PROJECT: C.P.S.
ADDRESS:<2304Faraaay~C-af[fb]g
PERMIT NUMBER: 980527
EPOXY REBAR
FILE: R8D16
REPORT DATE: 04/16/98
MATERIAL TYPE, GRADE, SOURCE: Grade 60 Rebar; Simpson Epoxy Tie, ICBO 4945.
Inspection Date Report
04/08/98 Performed Epoxy Rebar Inspection.
Location and extent of work inspected include:
-Inspected thirty-eight drilled holes for epoxy installation for# 4 rebar.
Hole size is 5/8" x 6-1/2" as per detail 11A/A4.
Location: footing for mezzanine.
-Holes were found to be clean prior to bolt installation.
WORK INSPECTl;D CONFORMS WITH APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED
Inspection performed by: Phil Porter
s:::~
Signature of Special Inspector
cc: • City of Carlsbad
White Constr.
P Porter
File
618
Certification #
. !
= \\ --
~ =
\})
i l
i ! ·t •
l I l
1 J
' 1 l ! l ! l t
l l
I
I ,
/ I I i • I
(
I i !
. '
~~2 ~ \)l \-\
~ tt~ ~ ~~ ~: ~-t ('\ . f . ' "~ -
' .
' ' . . ' :
I l
. '•. ,,,
I -----s---+----------------~----·-----r---·
!
!
l
~ ~
t:: ~ } ,-
(\\
(\ I -\
f~ -~~ ~J\ :~?-')(. )---~ 1\ ' -J! -r. :t: \1\\)1 • II~ ~ tJL -" . \'\ -· )-u ~t iJ ,, r ·. } .. )' \ . -
\n"L {'\ -_,,,.,, •,,,. ~
,.; ~~~ :_·_ \1\· \ ~,j ',. fl • I • • I ··,, (n;a \ -:::.· 2 l ; · .... · ·t,i ··7' ~ 2· · I l1 1 . I . '),: H rl ·. ~. ~ ._,. ,,
=-
-,oTµ,, O .L,.
e., I HJ'l-. ~fZ-lZ-ll?D{L
EJ
.1~ 1. ·l I -I I.
~~-,;;.
·a, J -'I.--f/'TH Pf ·-:~ LT-t:.x1S1 1& 1
T~VE:.L-. , \ -· 14Jt!X l~·oX
t°l~ O.l,. , e t.,oF,,F.,'f ~I S1 I ~ • ·---:--H •• .-1~!
G0 x71J tJoofZ-Pflc>VCOEEP
/--fflJ. fU!G'I;, NIPTH =-I/-$ 1' < 7z1t ~
µ11-1. µ6C WIPTH ·=" :z .t "< 36,,
fLO.?(Z.. M-EA -flf2->T A--f2-.
OfftC-lz.
sr:-
4-,31(/Ioo ==43Y{ > 30
2 EXIT /2EQO.
/1--frn.)
i ~ . I
l
i /1ANl.,l~TU!UN<?
-.!
!., 2 #' • ""7!1 I' 7 ,.. .!::r: 1----
SF-/ . 7,151 /~c='3t:f.7t, '?3o
2 f'.Xti f<ES.D
(~)
·:;oe,, ... --.,.
. = -¥=*= ;1
/ [_-. W~ou~E-6,4'1o¼bt1"' 12,fg <3o
IS<tT~P i
l t-··-······ I
• -!, ' "CO" , ....... ·---"; c·;---;·:.1
S,Z.74 OL-.
~VIDW 4 1::¥11
'>,r-::':
"-~
I
. J._
.fLoo~ .Af2-E:.A -SECoND f-L.12-.
EJ(ISTIN e, OFAC£.
/-JESW OFF/CE-.
4480/ttH> =
'3,62-o SF-
/300
4,4-t}O ~F
44-,8-? 30
Zf=.XCT~fo.
E-.'X«TINe, C§Cf-1~
5 ; z
' ..
I.
EsGil Corporation
'l.n Partttersfiip witli (jovemment for 'lJuiufing Safe~
DATE: March 30, 19~8
JURISDICTION: Carlsbad
PLAN CHECK NO.: 98-527 · SET: Ill
~CANT
~
D PLAN REVIEWER
0 FILE
PROJECT ADDRESS: 2304 Faraday Ave.
PROJECT NAME: CPS PRINTING Addition: and TI
[Z]
D
D
. ~
D
D
·D
The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply
with the jurisdiction's building codes.
The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes
when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff.
The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list
and sho.u.l_d t?~ c:;orrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck.
-. -· .. -~ .·-·-..
~ ··"4'
The check list transmltt°ed .. l"\erewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil
Corporation until corre~ted plans-are S!,Jl;>mitted for recheck.
The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant
contact person.
The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to:
[Z] Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
0 Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan chec~ has been completed.
Person G.ontacted: Telephone#:
Date contacted: (by: ) Fax#:
e ep,one Fax In Person
REMARKS: Applicant shall provide sheets E-1, E-2, M1 and M2. for two sets of plans to be
completed as the set marked owner Ill.
By: Sergio Azuela
Esgil Corporation
. D GA D CM D EJ D PC
Enclosures:
3/23 trnsmtl.dot
9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (619) 560-1468 + Fax (619)-560-1576
EsGH Corporation
'l.n Partnersliip Witli (jovemment for '.BuiUing Safetg
DATE: March 18, 1998
JURISDICTION: Carlsbad
PLAN CHECK NO.: 98-527 SET: II
PROJECT ADDRESS: 2304 Faraday Avenue
PROJECT NAME: CPS PRINTING Addition and Tl
D APPLICANT
;;-1::1 JURIS.
D PLAN REVIEWER
D FILE
D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply
with the jurisdiction's building codes.
D The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes
when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department
staff.
D The· plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list
and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck.
i:g] The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil
Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck.
D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant
contact person.
i:g] The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to:
Steve White
6351 Corte del Abeta # A 100, Carlsbad, CA 92009
i:g] Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
D Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
Person contacted: Telephone#:
Date contacted: (by: ) Fax#:
Mail Telephone Fax In Person
D REMARKS:
By: Sergio Azuela Enclosures:
Esgil Corporation
D GA 0 CM 0 EJ 0 PC 3/10 trnsmtl.dot
9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (619) 560-1468 + Fax (619) 560-1576
Carlsbad 98-527 II
March 18, 1998
RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST
JURISDICTION: Carlsbad
PROJECT ADDRESS: 2304 Faraday Avenue
DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY
ESGIL CORPORATION: 3/10
REVIEWED BY: Sergio Azuela
FOREWORD {PLEASE READ):
PLAN CHECK NO.: 98-527
SET: II
DATE RECHECK COMPLETED:
March 18, 1998
This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building
Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state
laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review
is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections
based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department
or other departments. ·
The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied
before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and ·regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3,
1994 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any
state, county or city law.
A. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints to:
Esgil Corp. or to the bldg. dept. of the juris.
B. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon
which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the
revised plans.
C. The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews. The original
correction number has been given for your reference. In case you did not keep a copy of
the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding
corrections. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items.
D. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of
corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where
they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list?
DYes DNo
Carlsbad 98-527 II
March 18, 1998
1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the
correction list.
Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans
for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be
submitted in one of two ways:
1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to
the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, CA
92009, (619) 438-1161. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation
and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments.
2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil
Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (619)
560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to
the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning,
Engineering and Fire Departments.
NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not
be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review
by EsGil Corporation is complete.
6. The tenant space and new and/or existing facilities serving the remodeled area
must be accessible to and functional for the physically disabled. ·see the
attached correction sheet. Title ~4, Part 2.
DEPARTMENT OF STATE ARCHITECT NON RESIDENTIAL
TITLE 24 DISABLED ACCESS REQUIREMENTS
• SANITARY FACILITIES
• PLEASE CLARIFY IF THERE ARE EXISTING BATHROOMS ON THE SECOND FLOOR. NOTE
THAT IF THERE ARE EXISTING BATHROOMS IN THE SECOND FLOOR THEY HAVE TO BE
DISABLED ACCESSIBLE.
28. Original corrections 28 to 31 shall be rechecked. See original correction list.
If you have any questions, please contact Sergio Azuela of Esgil Corporation at (619)
560-1468. Thank you.
lt:J/1.l l'13 Pt>N Q-fEf:.11' * ''13 -.t:/68
SI!;: JI
---------~~~::::.!.......::~-~~____µr;;~~61L-)
-fto <TY
(,,,,:,-y--
;-1,,,:t Sur ;,. ., ,
//
l~~~----------------.J.
@ Prr;e -< vf -Me ~./c...r Sho~.: Sf#Jri :) 6 / should (.(.Se. -Z8 I/ ..s s / 4-3..f-R. Bv.t_
S ..'.l. • / shoi.J.J .;:i...6 ~ S S' I 4 5 .C . f'J-ett-H:.... C / o ,,.;7 .
EsGil Corporation
'l.n Partnersfiip witfi (jovemment for '13uiUing Safetg
DATE: March 3, 1998
JURISDICTION: Carlsbad
PLAN CHECK NO.: 980527 SET: I
PROJECT ADDRESS: 2304 Faraday Ave.
PROJECT NAME: CPS PRINTING Addition and TI
D APPLICANT ~~
~VIEWER
D FILE
D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply
with the jurisdiction's building codes.
D The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes
when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department
staff.
D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficie~cies identified on the enclosed check list
and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck.
[g] The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil
Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck.
D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant
contact person.
[g] The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to:
Steve White
6351 Corte del Abete# A 100, Carlsbad, CA 92009
[g] Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
D Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
Person contacted: Telephone #:
Date contacted: (by: ) Fax#:
Mail Telephone Fax In Person
D REMARKS:
By: Sergio Azuela Enclosures:
Esgil Corporation
D GA DCM ~ EJ 0 PC 2/20 trnsmtl.dot
9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (619) 560-1468 + Fax (619) 560-1576
Carlsbad 980527
March 3, 1998
PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST
COMMERCIAL
PLAN CHECK NO.: 980527
OCCUPANCY: B
TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN
JURISDICTION: Carlsbad
USE: Print Shop/Office
ACTUAL AREA: 23,350 SF
800 SF addition
ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA: 72,000 SF STORIES: 2
HEIGHT:
SPRINKLERS?: YES
REMARKS:
DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY
JURISDICTION: 2/9/98
DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW
COMPLETED: March 3, 1998
FOREWORD (PLEASE READ):
OCCUPANT LOAD: 150
DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY
ESGIL CORPORATION: 2/20
PLAN REVIEWER: Sergio Azuela
This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building
Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state
laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan
review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other
corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering
Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be
required prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Code sections cited are based on the 1994 UBC.
The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied
before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3,
1994 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any
state, county or city law.
To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list ( or a copy) where each
correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet number, specification section, etc.
Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans.
LIST NO. 22, GENERAL COMMERCIAL WITHOUT ENERGY OR POLICY SUPPLEMENTS (1994 UBC) comforw.dot
Carlsbad 980527
March 3, 1998
1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the
correction list.
Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans
for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be
submitted in one of two ways:
1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to
the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, CA
92009, (619) 438-1161. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation
and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments.
2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil
Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (619)
560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to
the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning,
Engineering and Fire Departments.
NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not
be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review
by EsGil Corporation is complete.
• FIRE-RESISTIVE CONSTRUCTION
2. Clearly label and identify on the plans the fire-resistive corridors, area
separation walls, shafts, occupancy separation walls. and floors, exit courts less
than 10 feet wide and exit enclosures, along with their hourly ratings. Section
106.3.3. Hall 212.
3. Show any existing fire rated area separation walls, occupancy separation walls,
demising walls, shafts or rated corridors. Identify and provide construction
details for proposed new fire rated walls. Please clarify if the existing 1 hr
rated wall construction is an existing 1 hr occupancy separation wall. If it is
then the openings shall be 1 hr (not 314hr).
4. Specify on the plans the fire ratings of assemblies to protect penetrations or
proposed openings in existing or new fire walls, floor-ceiling assemblies or
roof-ceiling assemblies.
• EXITS
5. In all occupancies, floors above the first story having 10 or more occupants,
shall have not less than two exits. Section 1003.1. Clearly show on plans the
two exits from the second floor.
6. The tenant space and new and/or existing facilities serving the remodeled area
must be accessible to and functional for the physically disabled. See the
attached correction sheet. Title 24, Part 2.
7. Provide an exit analysis plan (may be 8 1/2" x 11" or any convenient size).
Carlsbad 980527
March 3, 1998
• STAIRWAYS
8. Stairway width must be at least 44 inches when serving 50 or more occupants;
36 inches when less than 50. Section 1006.2.
• EXIT SIGNS
9. Exit signs are required whenever two exits are required. Show all required exit
sign locations. Section 1013.1.
• FOUNDATION
10. Provide a copy of the project soil report prepared by a California licensed
architect or civil engineer. The report shall include foundation design
recommendations based on the engineer's findings and shall comply with UBC
Section 1804.
• MISCELLANEOUS
11. GFCI protected convenience receptacles are required to be installed within 25'
of roof mounted HVAC equipment.
To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each
correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number,
calculation page, etc.
Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a
result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly
describe them and where they are located in the plans.
Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction
list? Please indicate:
Yes D No D
The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320
Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number
of 619/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any
questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Sergio Azuela at
Esgil Corporation. Thank you.
Carlsbad 980527
March 3, 1998
DEPARTMENT OF STATE ARCHITECT NON RESIDENTIAL
TITLE 24 DISABLED ACCESS REQUIREMENTS
The following disabled access items are taken from the 1995 edition of California Building Code, Title 24.
Per Section 101.17.11, all publicly and privately funded public accommodations and commercial
facilities shall be accessible to persons with disabilities as follows:
(1) Any building, structure, facility, complex, or improved area, or portions thereof,.which are
used by the general public.
(2) Any sanitary facilities which are made available for the public, clients, or employees in
such accommodations or facilities.
(3) Any curb or sidewalk intended for public use that is constructed with private funds.
(4) All existing accommodations when alterations, structural repairs or additions are made to
such accommodations.
NOTE: All Figures and Tables referenced in this checklist are printed in the California Building Code,
Title 24.
• REMODELS, ADDITIONS AND REPAIRS
1. When alterations, structural repairs or modifications or additions are made to an existing
building, that building, or portion of the building affected is required to comply with all of the
requirements for new buildings, per Section 11348.2. These requirements apply only to the area
of specific alteration, repair or addition and shall include:
a) A primary entrance to the building and the primary path of travel to the area in
question, and include the following items which serve ~he area in question:
i) Sanitary facilities.
ii) Drinking fountains.
iii) Public telephones.
• SITE PLAN REQUIREMENTS
2. Clearly show that the site development and grading are designed to provide access to all
entrances and exterior ground floor exits, as well as access to normal paths of travel, per Section
11278.1. Where necessary to provide access, shall incorporate pedestrian ramps, curb ramps,
stairways and handrails, etc.
3. Plans show that more than one building is located on the proposed site. Accessible routes of
travel shall be shown to be provided between buildings and accessible site facilities, per Section
11278.1.
4. Show, or note that at every primary public entrance, and at every major function area along, or
leading to, an accessible route of travel, there is to be a sign displaying the international symbol
of accessibility. Signs are required to indicate the direction to accessible building entrances and
facilities, per Sections 11178.5.7 and 11278.3.
Carlsbad 980527
March 3, 1998
• DISABLED ACCESS PARKING SPACES
5. Revise plans to show that at least one in every 8 accessible spaces are served by an access
aisle :c:96" in width and designated as VAN ACCESSIBLE, per Section 11298.4.2. All such
spaces may be grouped on one level of a parking structure. Please revise the plans to show
the required access aisle width of 96".
6. Show or note on the plans that the accessible parking spaces are to be identified by a
reflectorized sign, permanently posted immediately adjacent to and visible from each space,
consisting of:
a) A profile view of a wheelchair with occupant in white on dark blue background.
b) The sign shall :c:70 in2 in area.
c) When in the path of travel, they shall be posted ~80" from the bottom of the sign to
parking space finished grade.
d) Signs may also be centered on the wall of the interior end of the parking space :c:36"
from the parking space finished grade, ground or sidewalk.
e) Spaces complying with Section 11298.4.2 shall have an additional sign "Van-Accessible"
mounted below the symbol of accessibility per Section 11298.5.
f) In addition, each accessible space is required to be marked with the international symbol
of accessibility.
7. Show, or note, that an additional sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place at each
entrance to off street parking facilities, or immediately adjacent to and visible from each stall or
space. The sign shall be ::::17" x 22" with lettering not ~1" in height. Per Section 11298.5 required
wording is as follows. "Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not
displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for persons with disabilities may be
towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed at ______ or by
telephoning ______ "
• CURB RAMPS
• PLEASE CLEARLY SHOW THE CURB RAMPS ON THE PLANS.
8. Revise plans to show that curb ramps shall be constructed at each corner of a street intersection
or where a pedestrian way crosses a curb, per Section 11278.5.1.
• ENTRANCES AND CIRCULATION
9. Floors of a given story shall be a common level throughout, or shall be connected by pedestrian
ramps, elevators or lifts. Section 11208.1.
1 o. Revise plans to show that all entrances, and exterior ground level exits, are accessible, per
Section 1001.9.1.
11. Show that an accessible route of travel is to be provided to all portions of the building, to
accessible building entrances and between the building and the public way, per Section
1114B.1.2.
Carlsbad 980527
March 3, 1998
• DOORS
• ALL DOORS IN THE ACCESS ROUTE SHALL BE SHOWN TO BE IN COMPLIANCE.
12. Revise plans, or door schedules to show that every required passage door has :2:32" clear width,
per Section 1004.6.
13. Show, or note, that there is a level floor or landing on each side of all doors. The floor or landing
is to be :S;½" lower than the doorway threshold, per Section 1004.9.1 a.
14. Show or note that all hand-activated door opening hardware meets the following requirements,
per Section 1004.3.1:
a) Is to be centered :?:30" but :S;44" above floor.
b) Latching, or locking, doors in a path of travel are operated with a single effort by:
i) Lever type hardware.
ii) Panic bars.
iii) Push-pull activating bars.
iv) Or other hardware designed to provide passage without the requirement to grasp
the hardware.
15. Show or note that the lower 1 O" of all doors comply with Section 1004.8.1, as follows:
a) To be smooth and uninterrupted, to allow the door to be opened by a wheelchair footrest,
without creating a trap or hazardous condition.
b) Narrow frame doors may use a 1 O" high smooth panel on the push side of the door.
NOTE: Exception for automatic or sliding doors.
16. Revise plans to show that the minimum strike edge distances are provided at the level area on
the side to which a door (or a gate) swings, per Section 1004.9.2.3a:
a) :?:24" at exterior conditions.
b) :?:18" at interior conditions.
c) :?:12" on the push side, if the door has both a latch and a closer.
17. Revise plans to show that the space between two consecutive door openings in a vestibule,
which serves spaces other than a required exit stairway:
a) Provide :?:48" clear space from any door opening into the vestibule when door is open
90°, per Section 1004.9.2.4a.
b) Doors in series shall swing either:
i) In the same direction.
ii) Away from the space between the doors.
18. Provide a note on the plans that the maximum effort to operate doors, applied at right angles to
hinged doors or at center plane at sliding doors, per Section 1004.5.1, will be:
a) :S;8½# at exterior doors.
b) :S;5# for interior doors.
c) :S;15# where fire doors are required.
Carlsbad 980527
March 3, 1998
19. Revise plans to show a level area, or landing, per Section 1004.9.2.2a:
a) ~60" in the direction of door swing.
b) ~48" in the direction opposite the door swing (or 44" if doors don't have latches or
closers).
• STAIRWAYS AND HANDRAILS
20. Revise plans to show that handrails are provided on each side of the stairs, per Section
1006.9.1.
21. Provide sections, details or notes to show that handrails are to be located ~34" but ~38" above
nosing of treads, per Section 1006.9.2.1 a.
22. Show that handrails extend a ~12" beyond top nosing, and ~12"-plus-tread-width beyond the
bottom nosing, per Section 1006.9.2.2a.
23. Per Section 1006.9.2.6a, please provide details, sections or notes to show that handgrip portions
of handrails are:
a) ~1 ¼" and ~1 ½" in cross sectional dimension.
b) The shape may provide an equivalent gripping surface.
c) The handgrip portion shall have a smooth surface, without any sharp corners.
24. Show or note that interior stair treads are marked at the upper approach and the lower tread of
each stair, by a strip of clearly contrasting color, per Section 1006.16.1, as follows:
a) At least 2" wide.
b) Placed parallel to and not more than 1" from the nose of the step or landing.
c) The strip shall be as slip resistant as the other treads of the stair.
25. Note that all tread surfaces comply with Section 1006.16.2.1, as follows:
a) Be slip resistant.
b) Have smooth, rounded or chamfered exposed edges.
c) Have no abrupt edges at the nosing.
d) Nosing shall not project ~1 ½" past the face of the riser above.
e) Open risers are not permitted.
• SANITARY FACILITIES
• PLEASE CLARIFY IF THERE ARE EXISTING BATHROOMS ON THE SECOND FLOOR. NOTE
THAT IF THERE ARE EXISTING BATHROOMS IN THE SECOND FLOOR THEY HAVE TO BE
DISABLED ACCESSIBLE.
26. Sanitary facilities are required to be accessible, unless the enforcing agency determines that
compliance with these standards would create an unreasonable hardship. Provide a completed
HARDSHIP WAIVER REQUEST FORM if equivalent facilitation is requested to be permitted,
per Section 11158.1.
27. Where separate nonaccessible facilities are provided for each sex, separate accessible facilities
are required to be provided for each sex as well. Where nonaccessible unisex facilities are
provided, accessible unisex facilities are required to be provided, per Section 11158.2.
Carlsbad 980527
March 3, 1998
28. Revise plans to show that passageways leading to sanitary facilities have required clear access
widths, per Section 111 SB.4. Show that all doorways have:
a) ~32" clear opening.
b) A clear area:
i) ~60" in the direction of the door swing.
ii) ~44" away from the direction of door swing.
c) All strike edge clearance dimensions are required to be met.(i.e. 18" strike edge
distance).
29. Note that the doorways leading to sanitary facilities shall be identified, per Section 111 SB.5, as
follows:
a) An equilateral triangle ¼" thick with edges 12" long and a vortex pointing upward at
men's rest rooms.
b) A circle ¼" thick, 12" in diameter at women's rest rooms.
c) A 12" diameter circle with a triangle superimposed on the circle and within the 12"
diameter at unisex rest rooms.
d) The required symbols shall be centered on the door at a height of 60".
e) Braille signage shall also be located on the wall adiacent to the latch outside of the
doorways leading to the sanitary facilities, per Section 1117B.5.9.
• MULTIPLE ACCOMMODATION SANITARY FACILITIES
30. Note that if standard compartment doors are used, that the following will be provided, per
Section 111 SB. 7 .1.3:
a) ~9" clearance for footrests underneath.
b) A self closing device.
If non-standard compartment doors are used, clearance at the strike edge as specified in Section
1004.9.2.2 is required.
• RESTROOM FIXTURES AND ACCESSORIES
31. Show, or note, on the plans that accessible urinals meet the following requirements, per Section
111 SB.9.4 and California Plumbing Code:
a) The rim of at least one urinal shall:
i) Project 14" from the wall.
ii) Be ~17" above the floor.
b) The force to activate the flush valve shall be :;,s# force.
c) The control mechanism is be located :;,44" above the floor.
d) ~30" x 48" clear floor space is provided in front of the accessible urinal.
Carlsbad 980527
March 3, 1998
32. Plans indicate proposed showers. Revise plans to show, or note, compliance with the following
requirements, per Section 11158.6.2 and California Plumbing Code: Please clarify if the
compartment adjacent to the accessible toilet room shown on sheet A-2 is a shower. If
this compartment is not a shower and the existing bathrooms in the building are not
provided with any shower, please disregard this correction. Otherwise please show
compliance.
a) Compartments are:
i) ~42" in width between wall surfaces.
ii) ~48" in depth between wall surfaces.
iii) Have an entrance opening of 2::36".
b) Grab bars comply with Section 11158.8 located:
i) On walls adjacent to and opposite the seat.
ii) Mounted ~33" but :S:36" above the shower floor.
c) If a threshold or recessed drop is used, it shall be:
i) :S:½" in height.
ii) Be beveled or sloped :S:45° from the horizontal.
d) The shower floor shall slope :S:½ per ft. toward the rear to a drain located :S:6" of the rear
wall.
e) The floor surface shall be of either Carborundum, grit faced tile or of material providing
equivalent slip resistance.
f) Indicate a folding seat, located on the wall opposite the controls, 18" above the floor.
g) The soapdish shall be located on the control wall :S:40" above the shower floor.
h) If a separate shower compartment is not provided, the shower is be:
i) Located in a corner, with L-shaped grab bars extending along two adjacent walls.
ii) A folding seat adjacent to the shower controls is to be provided.
i) A flexible hand-held shower unit is required with:
i) A hose ~60" long.
ii) Head mounted 48" above finished floor.
NOTE: Two wall-mounted heads may be installed in lieu of the hand-held unit in areas
subject to excessive vandalism, per Section 5-1505.
END OF DOCUMENT
Carlsbad 980527
March 3, 1998
VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE
JURISDICTION: Carlsbad
PREPARED BY: Sergio Azuela
BUILDING ADDRESS: 2304 Faraday Ave.
BUILDING OCCUPANCY: B
BUILDING PORTION ' BUILDING AREA
(ft. 2)
Addition 800
Air Conditionino
Fire Sprinklers
TOTAL VALUE
PLAN CHECK NO.: 980527
DATE: March 3, 1998
CPS PRINTING Addition & TI
TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN
VALUATION VALUE
MULTIPLIER ($)
48,000
(City valuation)
48,000
[gj 1991 USC Building Permit Fee D Bldg. Permit Fee by ordinance: $ 401.50
[gj 1991 UBC Plan Check Fee D Plan Check Fee by ordinance: $ 260.98
Type of Review: [gj Complete Review D Structural Only D Hourly
D Repetitive Fee Applicable D Other:
Esgil Plan Review Fee: $ 208.78
Comments:
Sheet 1 of 1 .
macvalue.doc 5196
...
PLANNINC/ENCINEERINC APPROVALS
PERMITNUMBERCB 9£30~;?'? DATE ;J-.:J~ff' -==--------
ADDRESS---==;;;;__· --:~:::....__Lf __ ~--~----',4;J~_/f71r...,;.___ _____ _
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL ADDITION MINOR
< < $10,000.00)
OTHER
CNANTi~PROVE~
PLAZA CAMINO REAL
CARLSBAD COMPANY STORES
VILLACE FAIRE
COMPLETE OFFICE BUILDINC
-------------------
PLANNER
oocs/Mlsforms/Planning Engineering Approvals
... .., ""':
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET
D Estimate based on unconfirmed information from applicant.
D Calculation based on building plancheck plan submittal.
Address: 2 3cJ '-f ~Jo/' .At-:<--, Bldg. Permit No. /4.? 9f _§').. /
Prepared by;.1). K,'c/<... Date: 3 · b .9g Checked by: ____ Date: ____ _
EDU CALCULATIONS: List type's and square footages for all uses.
Types of Use: O(f>'<-,JL ~/Units: oOD EDU'·s: , 4'f
ADT CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses.
Types of Use: ______ _ Sq. Ft./Units: ------ADT's: _____ _
FEES REQUIRED:
PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE REQUIRED: DYES D NO (See Building Department for amount)
WITHIN CFO: DYES (no bridge & thoroughfare fee, reduced Traffic Impact Fee) D NO
~ARK-IN-LIEU FEE PARK AREA: ___ _
/ FEE/UNIT: X NO. UNITS:
t( 2. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE
=$ _____ _
ADT's/UNITS: j£_ ,_ X FEE/ADT: _'2_2_.....___ 3S-2-=$ ___ ~--
D 3. BRIDGE AND THOROUGHFARE FEE
ADT's/UNITS: ____ _ X FEE/ADT: ___ _ =$ _____ _
D 4. FACILITIES MANAGEMENT FEE ZONE:. ___ _
/ UNIT/SQ.FT.: ____ _ X FEE/SQ.FT./UNIT: __ --=$ ____ _
E("' 5. SEWER FEE
PERMIT No. 5rc· o/'J,,JJ
EDU's: __ , '1~:f ___ _
BENEFIT AREA: r
EDU's: __ , _L/_____._'j __
X FEE/EDU: I, '°6 Z.-f
DRAIN~GE BASIN: J{3 .
= $ __ <g...;:....;O 3.____
X FEE/EDU:
D 6. DRAINAGE FEES PLDA. ___ _ HIGH ___ /LOW __ _
ACRES:. _____ _ X FEE/AC:. ___ _ =$ _____ _
D 7. SEWER LATERAL {$2,500) =$ _____ _
J 5 q)
/
TOTAL OF ABOVE FEES*:$_
*NOTE: This calculation sheet is NQI a complete list (?fall fees which may be due.
Dedications and Improvements may also be required with Building Permits.
P:\DOCS\MISFORMS\8P0002.FRM REV 01/22/97
City of Carlsbad 98068
Fire Department • Bureau of Prevention
Plan Review: Requirements Category: Building Plan Check
Date of Report: Tuesday, March 3, 1998 Reviewed by:'1Jl, {lJ~-
Contact Name Steve White
Address 6351 Corte Del Abeto Ste A10D
City, State Carlsbad CA 92009
Bldg. Dept. No. CB980527 Planning No.
Job Name CPS Printing ----=-----------------
Job Address 2304 Faraday ----~-----------~--Ste. or Bldg. No. ____ _
~ Approved -The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is
based on plans; information and/or specifications provided in your submittal;
therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifica-
tions, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with
applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure
to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to
construct or install improvements.
D Disapproved -Please see the attached report of deficiencies. Please make corrections to
plans or specifications necessary to indicate compliance with applicable
codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this
office for review.
For Fire Department Use Only
Review 1st~--
CFD Job# __ 98----'0_6_8 __
2nd __ _ 3rd __ _
File# ___ _
2560 Orion Way · • Carlsbad, California 92008
Other Agency ID
• (619) 931-2121
. . I
. . :
. . I
~ .
' ·.. I I .· .
~ 4
,1 ••
1"110..IE<:T
CP'& ~IAmNI/ ,Al~ . .$.a.P¼J·
l"Clft. ' . iae-,v-,t=eAJ Iuo~~ J()a NO.
-·Engjwer
9153 Olcma Stroct
T~r,lc:: City. California 91780_
·--,----S---·--r---·· ······-·· '
02/19/98 07:11 TX/RX NO.1609 P.002
L0C:A'l'ION
~L.t"~,. C.-,.
lfflh
. '
lsao Kawasaki.
Stru btural Engineer
915: Olema Street
TCf!lblo City, Califorlli.a 91780
JC:,a NO.
. ' ' -·-. . ---···"--. ·-· -··---
02/19/98 07:11 TX/RX NO.1609 P.003 •
~-ti#
•TaN,
• I
--r.-:-1--t--·o.---...
f--t-r-t-'"lr--····---•..
1-;..,..;-.,..~---······ ··•·· --·
JsipKaw-.ki
-'En . . smcer
91 ~3 Dlema Stteot .
T~[nple City, California 91780
. ·-···· _, .. --t-,---..
JQ• NO.
,.·.· :_'.'./_,··_;::· 1 ; :· r :,_;..,_ , __ • -~. ;· :· .'I;. :. ,:, -~, ... :·:+'.,~-.,..-,··,,-... '.~·),,.4~:~ :'';-+: __ ,:·:·_. __ :,-~I:'_-_:,_~_·_._,'._·:_:,_:;__ .. :, __ :~-:-.···~~--;_·~;-~-' .. ·-:.-.:,
·.'--:·i. /_:.
1
..,t=:_;~_:_?,>"_:'.·:
1
1_ --:-------1.· ,F_:.~~.-__ :._ .. ~--~:_:=-.. ··-__ .-._ .. :_: __ -~_-__ --:_: __ ~:-.~-"-_:: ! r· ., .... l _._.-;-H-1-.~.~---~ . --· .....,_ --,-------....... ;. ·-~!:·~::.:-::::::: ...... 7""--. --'-~ ....... -: : i .l--~. ~--. ·-J·•• ' ·. ·.-·---.· .--:·---~--........ :------~·.-···-,
:.:.-.;) •:,, ·'0 _ _,_. • .,i ~ ·.1. ;_ __ L· ..... , ·•·. ...•.. • .! l ¥-:...~~·--~:.-~..:.... ..... , ______ ···-···--··-····---· ... ---··-·---~-----····-··-·
.;:/r ~:~ix.?.'.~ ·, .. . .. ; -· · ···v· :r.;:._;t..,.~·· .. ; : .. -.,;·;:.~~ .•· .. ·/~;0·~ .. --:-·,·. ·. ·~· ,,•,,.
02/19/98 07:11 TX/RX NO.1609 P.004 •
PC>N ·
h:raol-r-
s 'Bnpiecr
3
..... "40,
I..D<:ATION 915~ OlemaStrect .
!TIM, T~ble City, California 91780 ... --'"'-:-· -· .... '' -. . '. . ·-· ......... -., ... ___ ----h-···.
I I r!""°--:--"~••• .. "'-,..__,, ........... ,,. .. " "•• •••••"••-.-•••-•·-''"''··-•••••• ' __.. _, ___ , __ ,, _______ _
··· . .....:..-!iv 1/'Y··· Ir;(' · • • ·····-····--···---·~-···········~ .......... -·--··· • ·---····-·--·· ···-·-~ ~~~ ';f-f"'_f-:-f_..M···· -~ ·--:~._-·--.--, .,,~i,,,.,.-.. , ... ,---···--·111oo----.'.__,.,._:__: 1
H• ___ ,_._._;..., , , r
... ' ., 0 ' • ' ' • ' ' i ' i 1,
.. --.-......+-'--l--1--l-;-+'....;;,-h·f. ~ ·-~-::ii ·i?-:. :--:.~i;;-;.-:J ~t.:lf·r·~.::;J>:i~~--~----·--.. ···--.;----·,-·-f"T"'
J-r--'H~-,--..-
1
-i-
1
,...:..._ +,-· ./!'t.:tl. .......... ( ... _:.._ ... ~ _.2f..:._,_. _____ .... _:a..... .. -.... , ........ -'----~-·-·-.,:.,_;_ · , .. ,-.' , . 1 • • • ·., 1 .,
1-1--1--!--i--i--' -+·i...:....~·-1.;~1··,:-;;;~~~ )i-i:-:;_)>~p_ .. ~)~i~·l!,:.L .. ~:~---~-~~h-. .~ I I ; .. ·; ., ~ ( :· .-,
l ....:...:,____.__,~-• • ----.-' • ~ • j.,.. ' I ••• •._...:,..,..,..____ ' ! ·1 I'
I I
;,_~ ~/I.:'·· W /.~ vz.1,..-·i-:,.-.. ,P..'tf' :3"1.-~~-==.:.~~:-~-:.:_:.~=:_~·-·--· . -. . , . : ····-~, .. :. I I ,-I • • • • , -1 • l-l-,-1-,f-,-;--i....+-'-.-1--·-1--,--'-· ..,.,,..., ____ , ____ p,---~z·-fo . ' .. _...,...;, . : I " ' . '.' ., . I
.,. I I ~:f -.... -·-· ....... -····· ___; .... -.----==-··· -~I. ----···..: .. _..:. __ : ...... ..:..., ___ .,~_.:.,~. ,-. ' ·: ·; ., . I • ' .• ! ' . I
: I : ;· ~;:r*= 1,~:,-.x ~ ,~i-~-Jrf;:::;;~,-~-'-9,i;ffeit;.·zi.~:.t;J-i.~. : :··1=R
t--'H'-!--i---.--+-'--'-... -4--~..;.· .. -_..:_... . --.. ,.. .--···· _.,.,_..,._.._. _·!l__i_ __ ,: .. ~-'-· _ ' J • I 1
·-· , • ;. l 1 I i I' . ...,.., II''.' . . ---. . . I ,. I• 11 I I ____ ..... _____ .. ,.,. ; 'i ~ I : -, : .... ·---:--· .. ··.--.! .. I I • I • I : I ~
1-+-+-1-l-4-l,.I..J.i...;;¢,:b2,1;~~.i~".:.:.:..zs-;:i~ :_. I -:-: ~·. ', ·~ • ••• ~ -· .. • ~·:·~-: -~--·::_~~--_:· • • --~~
j-1-..l-t ...J..j -4-l-1,l....i.-f,-....... ' +.-: ·;~f.,-Js;'..:?<fo-" = f>.8·~~c~,;;;o•iJ#" r;Es~~~~: .. :.~: .. _.~_c,--.....1..
l-~H-4-t-r' -:.' ..... ..;...~,c......, ____ ---~-~ :-: •. ,, . I •• --.--=:.:.:: . -··---·-· ,~_,_· ....... ______ ~
J-l-f-i--i-.--,....!.-l-...:..-1!-;i-: -. ft" --___ ., __ ---.-..... ' ·: ;__, _ _l__. __ 1-----• ..... _ . .:., __ __,c.__; ____ ...!._j ·-,------...L.~-
l-!--'l-i'-11-.+-..-.;_,:_....;.-_-:--~-.••• ,.,,._, ____ ,,. ... ,_.. : I , •' 1 : --'---:---•--..:,__ __ ,~·-_,''~·--.;...,_ __ _,_ _ _;__
l-i'-1-!.i,-.-T-· ...,._;___;___.i; _ _;_ ___ ,'.,_ __ ·-·-----·-.. t-;----R--'--+.;... ___ ...:,.. __ ._ 1· ~ 4.. 1 I
! T'I"" •, 1---. ~-'---~--------!...[ .,_. _t ... :,-i ·:--1-1;..' ...;...+4i_;_-,.i_...._:,_...,;._. ' . ,,• . ·--··-... . -~------;': : : ;,, '-~~:~~~:··~-:~ .. ~:::~:":~::.:~.-~=:::::~..L~~:::=-.-.. -~~-=:~~.:-=;'=--=:.-; .. ·-~·~~~-:~...,;-·-'------;~·· ... :-__., ___ ...;._· _. -;:....'· .!
/~, C 'Ai/1/"lfl..lJI .:l'/f-.-.. ·:---:·~-:--:-.. --0 -··-·-·-.. ·---::-·"·-·-,--,--+--,---~-.:___;.._ .,l::".Lr,,frl ......... r.ir4, . . ' . I I'.· '17
1-t-r-+---...._._I.__I---·, ,;.__".;:;.,: .. "ii"fll!'~ ... = ; ... : . Al,·P ·x t o:.x. Jr>cs. ·-w.-' i . .: .1--· ; ~. 0 .. , 1
.: . . . . 1 .
1-1--·t-: ...;.·;.....,..i.J ......... I ..i.'~---a·i:-, _V....:,_···-~.--·~-·-"i!f-w~~-.... ,:::V:..;.;;..-,,, .....,.,. .. -, .... t,.-..;.,., ... ,-............ :--:: .. -:: .. ~.... . •.. :::'.'.°. <!. '6.~,. __ f!V_.-···--i-~--~----··-· ·~·:··:~-+
01 j ;·,:.: I :••·--.-,·:~.·-::J_~f~~·~;:·.: -~~-~=:~:~-~~~••;~~.::. . .; '
. , , ; , ; ! ~-··w=-.~:·~-~--lif""'(JtC. ~:-::+_·t:;7-:x,:.,r)b~-x~ ft,1.·-=:::~~-'J.t.1_~¥;0..,;.. ·: ' I ' .; • • ~+; 1
1-t-t-+-+-+--. 1 .;.....-..,,...........· ·_. \l ,;~, i 5$ ,.'. .Jq;~:~ 1P'; Ii,'-:.:~ ~=:~--, .,_: --'--:~. : :"· --~-~---·-, , : :
J-HH-4---l,1...;..-.....;..-:...-1---:'_"_· ·=-=·~:=~:~--:--:--·-·: :~-.:..:JJ.:--·---~-~~-,-... :-: -: · : ' . ~JI
......._-+-I "-I-· -'-l--'-)_,;;__,_~-l-'--.. ,·~-.·~=··. ,:,J'k .. ~J .. ;,/j£?i/;;;;;__-~:~~~-:;;;_~:_;·_···;··> . ; .. ,1. ! ; ,I 1 1 i I
l-
-+-11-l-....-,!-,+-'-llf-4.-..:!-l---·---·-~~i-; I 1' . ' ·. .., '-·--~----·--'-·~:..-' .. ; : ,, ' : I • • ~· : I : . ~ --· I I I ' I t I I , • ·, ' ., '...:,__!_ .. ~ ' • ' ' ' I I I ' I . . ' I ~ :. !·
• ·----, •. • 1 1 , ; ;· . • . , · · --JL·1·r:Ll§.JJ, · n-lA.1 -7.P-· -·
f-f-+-+-+-!-,.j-l..,.J......i--1-:/c)IJ,tt;;--~·~*-i : · ,6~.£. ~. -~f?/;;e.:p_:-,~:·· ·~cJt.~-rrrt..: . .!L., ~· --µt. ..
t-+-+-t-+-!-1-+-..,......;---+---, r---·-' ' . . : ; ' '2. 1:71:";·~ '-:-;---ru•, ',.,.. : . .. -. ' . . . ! ,1 ',:. . ~~ ; ! . '
I . .~ .. ·--·· __ 1.----:-" ........... ......-,C.. l_ ... T ~ ... -.---·--. . . _i.....J_:., • I ' ' • I l
I-H-!-!---l-4-i,_...~_jJ-. -1,..-j ...;.:_.;_ :· -, -,().1 ~ ~: -~ ~1)(,·~·;~: .. ~. •j7!)4·'/1 t,..~ : J ; •• :· •! '1 : . ; ·:.: ! 1 ! !' : ! ·i. i 'I . I
·1·: ;~~-".,:; ,·:·,.'.r-~:+r-·..:. ... : ! .. ·.:f·f,~1 ··1J .• m: .' .~.-~1:1 .. i·! I! I I :,i (,
....+-!--l-+.....j......--1--1-~,~---... ·~rt,' '"1 ' • • ~ -·c-,-" '· ,. • · · ·· I ! ; I I I I I 1-+,-···1-·· i-+-,:1---,µi-;.,..:~,~·~,~ otr."".., r -~· ~ ~ "" A-.!J,;.. ,. v '.1-+ i;,J· ··:.. /,:,. · ·O· · ·-·r.-;····. · · :·· ... ,.. . , . 'I {'\ • i-1"~ ,_ . __ .. ::J'-,• .. -"""".."'. . .-·-"•• ~J .• ~ .. !'_:_,.:...:..· , .. ' . ) ., ' I I . . . , I,,,•,. r·,, ,· .. a,.,_o,·. .. . ·1 , .. -,,·.I:,· ·~·.·-;-;-··it Ii
l--1-+-+-+--+-+-'-.l-.l,.....J,....:_;·..:...: ....:.: ·_,_, --. "~~"'Fi-' ~.~Lo,{' ~ ~·~1-.7,fl,Jt..J1~ ,,t)_;~~· 1il7' ;r;:~::..~-.. ;.····:·+f.6
' . . ' -~ . .. 't..;_ .. ···-··. '. '--L!LL.~ bi±: ~.= .. ~.~~~=~=~=!=~=t=~=~=:=~~~=~: ":_: ·:.:~~::i:=;:::~ -:-:~·:~~.~-~-~L~·~.~ .~.~~~.;J..iJ. '. ·i-+rTi ~~ .. Wil· ··: : ~ . ; .. : I :
: . :·,. , . ' : .. ! ,--...' .. ,--,.._.,:-· ... , u ,.~: .. -,,~ , ~· ·-~ ·ij !l}j,J :?[ r' ! I '•' •
· • • : r • • • ,. t,, • 1 1 f· J J _ 1 1 ~ , KJ ~__,:,_ J.r.,.., _____ .;;...,-L,..fr,r ~-· •· I , · ;
• •, , ·: .• .: f , I, .i. · · . : · ~ I i r • ! : i .1. f -:-l-. .. w .. ,. 1 i. . . : . -. , '·· 't. . i · , • : ~ I • J 1 ; •
/·!:',,. :.~J;:~>;: > ·I'' I ' ' I I I I I f ., 1 ·! ·:r:--·~--~ .. :~.·:·;·-~;·:r.~:-.J::::: .... (#.1i .. ~.!.'~.~·J: :~i=d .. , ; ·. ·:
~-:::-• • 1 I l __ :.,!-~.-!.....l...:.!.. ! ; ; 1 ·! ' 1 : , • i • •• ,Ai ,,' ! I :· '! •,, : ; .,· .. ·i l. J" l .j. 1· ,I ;• _ '# ,,· _.'. :¥~•.r .. '" t .-. ',J7.!..!,...!:,_,,'::;'.,,'in" 1· .I· · 1· .; l .I i · .. \ , ~·;·f-~.iL~ ~:··L°l·;--t-~-'l"'j-.,...., J'>,.."
V .. ".:-;··~~.~·,.;:;.::.:'. ·I..! I' 'II'.;•:, I ,I I •I l j I.I. r, l,l•~'ry"~_,' 'Z-IJ""'rT~.rto/·"' ~. :~:;-.-:·,t .. w-,. ··· .• ,. ~ i ··!, ·:. i 1! l ... ,,. -~ ,._,.,·I·. ' ,. I ' , ,. ' ,. , , i.:.;. 1~1 '1'' i I 1·· i r I ~, , . · · , , • 1 i' • ! : I ! ±!: • ~-~_,e.,>.ij · · ~ !~ ~ 1,; ,I'· I
-
:;i(ih~·. \',.,'.;;,·.' .. :>. ~ '.··_.I :
1
'. .: : I I I!',,,·· I I ,1,,l· i -1(2'/~! ·J.:::r .... /J',L~}"!'ti · ~· ~··"'!""il'-al-i-1-!--+-s
*°-!:,-J..*l~..-J.:..,.L.-L:...lj-..!-J.....,;._,~--., , J I I I I j_ f.·I ' ~-.. ~-
·,,,,·.·:~_:_;.·:_;,:_1~.~.'.·.-,'.;.:.;;_;_.,:~.'.:,·.~.;:,;;·,;.._ .... ··:i·;,:·:·.' ... ·:_··'.:_:·:! . ' • ' ::, .. · , .. ·:.;' :: ·.· •. ·.·.· ·!·_··.·: .. :'.· .. ·, .. · ..... :_.·,·_;, .. :.: .. ___ :·,· ~, .. ,. ·. ' •. ~ w • ~-\';-:_t::<.~=:: :·:::".?~·;/~'.~.---. '\> .~ .... ~·' . '· .... , . .: ,.'"
' " • • -Ii I ' ' • -'i-4 ...,'t 1 , , • 1 \." • •~, • ' 0 •, 0 :;: • ", ,, ' •,, • 0 • • •
1 • '•• • ' • ,."I',• •
! ! I
I·
' I
-i
' ,
02/19/98 07:11 TX/RX NO.1609 P.005 •
PQR ·
·· · ·•· · ··· ·Illao kawaaaki -·&ginccr
i.oei1:r11;1N 915' OlcmaStreet
Temple City. California 9·1780
----------..--r---~--.. --·-r-..•
. J·
>
·; ..
-._., ......
.'!.~ .. _;··.
-. ·~ ...... ·. :"
....
' • •lo ,, : : : : , .! I • • , r • -------:-++!--------'--'-,~I , ____ ,_ • • ,.,,...._._,....,..--.,c._-,-----
t-i-1-•;-+--,---•••. l¼k_, .......... -·-· ..... ····--·--·-'..: ,,, Iii I:. I .. :·~ .. --;--_·: ..• ··:-. _,:·-;···-·-... i.; I :
t--+---i-+-+--"''---M-----· .--·-···-·N·--~-·-+---'',--,:+-,-+,--'--,---'-i-----i-......,..-::--------·----· ..... ·-----,----·~---·-, ,,I t ! • !, I : " • : , J ' , : • • • ',
t-l--"-+--1--i--'--'' _ .... --::, .. __ ,., ... · -___ · ••. -~ • --~: ! .. !· .i· l ·1 ·:~: · , -'---'------''---'---"'--'
0 h \ 1\ ! I , i----+-.!..__.;.,__..,,,_' ____ ~_..,..:. ___ _,; ________ ~-,1
... ·I i J :'!.. .· 1· 1. .i I I ' 1 I .J ! .,. ' ! ·. ,' I ! . ---..... ;-, --,-,-".~.-i------.---, -.-7-----'-t-,, ..... "'-l--,1f-.-+_-,1-r,...-,;.....:.!-1i--/f-_-.·-.-,""· "",;....,,,.;...1··-,-,_...;_c.., .---'-,'--;---77~------, ...,...1 -1: ---=+-+-+-,. :, -. ·. . -~---· ·-· ..... -.. · ..i.-..! . ;.,_i__. • -----+------...:..-1-+'-···-·:, •..... :.....,+----~·--··--·· ... --.. ---·----I ! f. ! i ! ! ~-, ( i .. ~~~}.,: I • . . I ! I
........ ••• .... LI'!'·,..··+,·-· ___ ••• ---------7""-..... , , .. ,_ . J i. i I i I t /. I L I f• l • I .... .......;_, ____ ··'--'-'--,.......,,~,._"-___ ~_
~-;> :·· :.. 1~-:-.--.. ··'"' -------... -
1
14·1 ,.. 1 • 1· r. ! .~1 .= ~--1 __ ._. ___ • . . • . i 11-:...i. . .J
1-_--~+-.·-~:+~:.,.,~+: .... :'·~-,-.. :-· ... :----.:--~=:~-=~------.. ·--.... ' l;; .: ·:· I :~:==:..L~.J~-_:-.-~:_+ .. ~-:-:-~·~--~; '; .;
, 1 : ,_,:....:._., .... -·-· . r 1 , 1 , , , 1 .-• , , , 1_ • ...........:.._ __ ,.....J ______ . -~_.___;......-;,,_, . . . ~· 1.
t-:-,+.,..·,;,,-·+\-+ .. -!'-+'----'+-. -·------, .. -....... ·--. --... ~ '" l 1 . 1 i I ~ . ' ; · 1
• • • • , ;, ~i :
• ' ' • ,.· ~ '• I. ., ' I · 1. ; I ' ! . \• .. I i' . I i I t
.:;. .. ~:~ .:;i·,',:,: c·, j. j, 1 • · j .. _:_-_---• ' • • 'i I i , .. _: _;. i 1' ,, • 1 • :_·,··~~-:T"I · :_1 · ·.( ·.1 -,I, I •• •• 1 • ._,:_,_,,.,..:.. ...... .:...:.4,· ·--'-; .. '·,:" • ,.. • •••• .... I· , 1 1 1 · 1 1 r , ... , 1 i., . ·, , .. , , i : .• = ±J:i: , ,::tt~;_;:·:·> ··i !. 1 rr.·:·-.-~ ,~~· ,:• :· ·,, : --TI' ~~~t.h"·~;L-s·~; !~r~~~ -; · r ;_· 1 ./ ;: : ;.: 77-Y ~::IJ:_.:r~:;,,.;:;.:·· I I
1
.;· :. :~. I I I 'j . ) I.~ I I •·!'I I 'I i Iii I I·, i I·,.·· ·;
ft.~,-~;,J"'·"''!"'"". I ,.1.· •. ! .·.: : .. ::·'! J·i ! i' !'•t'>, ·· '·:I ··:.1,-f I I I I ·Ii I h-J.-..1 1 i ·!·:.::.J_J I L.i....J i:?:::-:-.~~": t.. £"::, ·:·'= • 1 ! ~ ; 1• ". 1• J ·! ~ • 1• , 1 ., 1 , ! 1 1 , • ! ·, r···,. ! , ~' i-r,-·-·t
' ,·.>..:~_,»,·.:,11·tt,·1 \;.r·, I 'I ·J.1111 1,,1.il 1illll. ... !'fi_:1,!
. : • I· 1 : . , -· :....,,L:.._____ < i . , I I ; ·1 ! ! __ ._ ... ~.L-· ~! _:.....::...+-LL....L.1 :· I ,: I ')'°""1"!
. :·: :-·· \ .. ' .. ; ' . ·.:<f :··:·:.'.:°§<:.> .. (. _.:..... ! ~,.'~¥;--··.·: ... . ..... ' .. ,,,', ··,.·: .. •· • ll'l.~,-· .. ·--:--!--t-..-----.------..,...,....,.,-,-..... -1.--.,.... .......... _...,. __ ~.:,;,,...;...._.:,. _________ N_
,• :.·
02/19/98 07: 11 TX/RX N0.1609 P.006 •
:
' !
GEOTECHN-ICS
INCORPORATED
EXPLANATION
Approximate Location of
Boring
SITE PLAN
2300, 2304, 2308 Faraday Avenue
Carlsbad, California
PROJECT NO. 0113-001-00
DOCUMENT NO. 3-0205
FIGURE NO. 1
,---
C B Commercial Real Estate Group
June 29, 1993
4.2 Fill
Project No. 0113-001-00
Doc. #3-0205
Page 4
Fill was observed in all of the exploratory borings and consisted primarily ·of olive green-
grey lean silty clay (CL), has low plasticjty, is dry to moist, and firm to hard. The surface
of the fill was dry to approximately 18 inches, and was desiccated with small open ground
cracks. The fill materials were derived from the Point Loma Formation, and are also
highly expansive.
4.3 Groundwater
No seepage or groundwater was observed in our investigation. Changes in rainfall,
irrigation, or site drainage could produce seepage or locally perched groundwater
conditions within the soil or bedrock underlying the site.-
5.0 GEOLOGIC HAZARDS AND SEISMICITY
5.1 Geologic Hazards
The subject site is not located within an area previously known for geologic hazards,
including active faulting, nor was evidence of past soil failures or faulting noted in our
investigation.
5.2 Seismicity and Faulting
The subject site is located about 7 miles east of the Rose Canyon fault zone. It has
recently been suggested that this fault is active, capable of generating a magnitude 6.4
earthquake (maximum probable event). The estimated peak site. ground acceleration for
such and event is 0.36g. Design of structures should comply with the requirements of the
governing jurisdictions, building codes and standard practices · of the Association of
Structural Engineers of California.
Groundbreaking due to active faulting is considered to have a low potential, due to the
distance from active fault traces.
,-
C B Commercial Real Estate Group
June 29, 1993
Project No. 0113-001-00
Doc. #3-0205
Page 5
6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
6.1 General Discussion
No geotechnical conditions were apparent during the investigation which would preclude
construction of the three buildings as planned. The most significant geotechnical
constraints noted are the presence of expansive fill soil and bedrock materials, and the
potential Jor a minor transition between bedrock and fill soils underlying the site.
Additionally, the existing surface soils are weathered including desiccation and expansive
cracking. It is recommended that the upper 4 feet of soils underlying the proposed
buildings be removed and recompacted. During recompaction, the soils should be
moisture conditioned to four percent over the optimum moisture content, to mitigate the
expansive potential of the building pad soils.
The remainder of this report presents recommendations in detail. These
recommendations are based on empirical and analytical methods typical of the standard
of practice in southern California. If these recommendations appear not to cover any
specific feature of the project, please contact our office for additions or revisions to the
recommendations.
6.2 Plan Review
It is recommended tt,at foundation plans, and grading plans be reviewed by Geotechnics
Incorporated prior to plan finalization.
6.3 Site Preparation
For the entire site, all existing vegetation and construction debris should be excavated and
hauled off site. Site preparation should then be performed consisti'ng of the removal and
compaction of four feet of existing soil in the areas of the proposed structures. The
removals should extend -laterally beyond the limits of proposed structures to a distance
of 5 feet. The bottom of the resulting excavation should then be observed by a
representative of Geotechnics Incorporated to evaluate if conditions are as anticipated.
C B Commercial Real Estate Group
June 29, 1993
Project No. 0113-001-00
Doc. #3-0205
Page 6
If conditions are as anticipated, the remQved soil should then be replaced as a uniformly
compacted fill as described in Section 6.5.
In areas that will be paved, it is recommended that the. existing soil be recompacted to a
minimum depth of 12 inches, and be recompacted to at least 95% of ASTM 1557.
6.4 Excavation Observation
Fo,undation excavations and site grading excavations should be observed by Geotechnics
lncorporate.d., During grading, Geotechnics Incorporated should provide observation and
testing services continuously. Such observations are considered essential to identify field
conditions that differ from those anticipated by the preliminary investigations, to adjust
designs to actual field conditions, and to determine that the grading is accomplished in
general accordance with the recommendations of this report. Recommendations
presented in this report are contingent upon Geotechnics Incorporated performing such
services. Our personnel should perform sufficient testing of fill during grading to support
our professional opinion as to compliance with compaction recommendations.
6.5 Fill Compaction
All fill and backfill to be placed in association with site improvements should be accom-
plished at a· minimum of four percent over optimum moisture conditions and using
equipment that is capable of producing a uniformly compacted product. The minimum ·
relative compaction recommended for fill is 90 percent of maximum density based on
ASTM 01557 (modified Proctor). Sufficient observation and testing should be performed
by the geotechnical consultant so that an opinion can be rendered as to the compaction
achieved. Fill should contain no rock material greater that .12 inches in greatest
dimension.
Imported fill sources, if needed, should be observed prior to hauling onto the site to
determine the suitability for use. Representative samples of imported materials and on
site soils should be tested by the geotechnical consultant in order to evaluate their
appropriate engineering properties. Imported soil should have an expansion index of no
more that 60 based on ASTM Test Method 4829.
~ I
C B Commercial Real Estate Group
June 29, 1993
Project No. 0113-001-00
Doc. #3-0205
Page 7
During grading operations, soil types other than those analyzed in the geotechnical reports
may be encountered by the contractor. The geotechnical consultant should be notified
to evaluate the suitability of these soils for use as fill and as finish grade soils.
6.6 Fill Slopes
The construction of compacted fill slopes should be performed in accordance with section
6.5, Fill Compaction. The slope faces should be compacted to the recommended 90
percent, either by rolling with a sheepsfoot roller or suitable heavy equipment, or by
overfilling the slope and cutting back to design grade. Fill slopes should be constructed
at slope ratio of 2: 1 (horizontal:vertical) or flatter, however a slope ratio of 1.5: 1 may be
used for slopes up to a maximum height of 6 feet.
6.7 Site Drainage
Foundation and slab performance depends greatly on how well the runoff waters drain
from the site. This is true both during construction and over the entire life of the structure.
The ground surf ace around structures should be graded so that water flows rapidly away
from the structures without ponding. The surf ace gradient needed to achieve this depends
on the prevailing landscape. In general, we recommend that pavement and lawn areas
within five feet of buildings slope away at gradients of at least two percent. Densely
vegetated_ areas should have ·minimum gradients of at least five percent away from
buildings in the first five feet. Densely vegetated areas are considered those in which the
planting type and spacing is such that the flow of water is impeded.
Planters should be built so that water from them will not seep into the foundation, slab,
or pavement areas. Site irrigation should be limited to the minimum necessary to sustain
landscaping plants. Should excessive irrigation, water line breaks, or unusually high
rainfall occur, saturated zones or "perched" groundwater may develop_ in fill soils. Any
subgrade portions of the site should have a back-drain constructed for exterior walls.
C B Commercial Real Estate Group
June 29, 1993
6.8 Foundation Recommendations
Project No. 0113-001-00
Doc. #3-0205
Page 8
These recommendations are considered generally consistent with methods typically used
in southern California. Other alternatives may be available. The foundation
recommendations herein should not be considered to preclude more restrictive criteria of
governing agencies or by the structural engineer. The design of the foundation system
should be performed by the project structural engineer, incorporating the geotechnical
parameters described in the following sections.
6.8.1 Foundation Design Criteria
The following design criteria assumes that the recommended site preparation
including moisture conditioning has been performed.
Allowable Soil Bearing:
Minimum Footing Width:
Minimum Footing Depth:
Minimum Reinforcement:
2,000 psf (allow a one-third increase for short-term
wind or seismic loads)
24 inches below lowest adjacent soil grade
Two no.5 bars at both top and bottom in continuous
footings.
Lateral loads against stru.ctures may be resisted by friction between the bottoms of
footings or slabs and the supporting soil. A coefficient of friction of 0.25 is recommended.
Alternatively, a passive pressure of 250 lbs/ft3 is recommended for the portion of vertical
foundation members embedded into compacted fill. If friction and passive pressure are
combined,· the passive pressure value should be reduced by one-third.
Footings on slopes should be founded at a depth su~h that at th~ distance between the
lower outside edge of the footing and the face of the slope is at least 12 feet.
r--
!
C 8 Commercial Real Estate Group
June 29, 1993
6.9 Seismic Design
Project No. 0113-001-00
Doc. #3-0205
Page 9
The recommended site coefficient for use in seismic design is soil profile S1 and S-Factor
1.2 in accoraance with UBC criteria. This also corresponds to Soil Type 1 for normalized
response spectra shapes.
6.10 Concrete On-Grade Slabs
Slabs should be designed for the anticipated loading. If an elastic design is used, a
modulus of subgrade reaction of 200 kips/ft3 should be suitable. As a minimum, slabs
should be at least 5 inches in thickness and be reinforced with at least #3 bars on 12 inch
centers, each way.
6.10.1 Moisture Protection for Slabs
Concrete slabs resting on soil ultimately cause the moisture content of the
underlying soils to rise. This results from continued capillary rise and the ending
of normal evapotranspiration. As concrete is permeable, moisture. will eventually
penetrate the slab unless some protection is provided.
To decrease the likelihood of problems related to damp slabs, suitable moisture
protection measures should be used where moisture sensitive floor coverings or
other factors warrant. A commonly used moisture protection consists of about four
inches of clean sand covered by 'visqueen' plastic sheeting. In addition, two
inches of sand are placed over the plastic to decrease concrete curing problems
associated with placing concrete directly on an impermeable membrane. It has
been our experience that such systems will transmit from approximately 6 to 12
pounds of moisture per 1000 square feet per day. This may be excessive for
some applications. If more protection is needed, we recommend that the slab be
underlain by at least 6-inches of minus 3/4-inch crushe~ rock, with no plastic
membrane. In addition, concrete with a higher cement content and a low slu~p
should used to. On-site quality control should be used ito confirm the design
conditions.
C B Commercial Real Estate Group
June 29, 1993
6.11 Reactive Soils
Project No. 0113-001-00
Doc. #3-0205
Page 10
Sulfate content of the on-site soil indicates that Type II cement be used in all concrete
which will be in contact with soil. The pH arid resistivity \'.alues of on-site soil are shown
in Appendix C, and may be utilized in the design life of buried metal structures.
6.12 Earth Retaining Structures
Cantilever retaining walls should be designed for an active earth pressure approximated
by an equivalent fluid pressure of 50 lbs/ft3• The active pressure should be used for walls
free to yield at the top at least 0.1 percent of the wall height. For walls restrained so that
such movement is not permitted, an equivalent fluid pressure of 75 lbs/ft3 should be used,
based on at-rest soil conditions. The above pressures do not consider any sloping
backfill, surcharge loads, or hydrostatic pressures. If these are aP.plicable, they _will
increase the lateral pressures on the wall and we should be contacted for additional
recommendations. Walls should be fully back-drained to relieve any hydrostatic pressure
and to decrease moisture permeation.
The above lateral pressures assume the use of the on-site clays as backfill. Recognizing
that these pressures are high, reduced pressures can be realized by using an imported
granular soil in the backfill zone defined by a 1: 1 plane back from the wall footing. Typical
active pressures for a nonexpansive sand would be 35 pcf, and typical at-rest pressures
would be 55 pcf. Actual pressures should be provided after a review of the imported soil
to be used.
Retaining wall backfill should be compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction,
_based on ASTM D1557. Backfill should not be placed until walls have achieved adequate
structural strength. Heavy compaction equipment which could cause distress to walls
should not be used.
6.13 Pavements
Two traffic types are assumed: areas of light traffic and passenger car parking (Traffic
Index = 4.0), and access drives and truck routes (Traffic Index = 5.5). The project civil
engineer review these values to determine if they are appropriate. An R-Value of 5 was
assumed, based on the high expansion potential and grain size analysis of on-site soils.
Based on these assumptions, our analysis indicates that a minimum section of 3-inches
of asphalt concrete over 6.5-inches of aggregate base should be suitable for light traffic
!
~
I
'
C B Commercial Real Estate Group
June 29, 1993
Project No. 0113-001-00
Doc. #3-0205
Page 11
areas. Three inches of asphalt concrete over 11.5-inches of aggregate base is
recommended for truck routes.
The upper 12 inches of the pavement subgrade should be scarified, brought to about
optimum moisture content, and compacted to at least 95 percent of maximum dry density
as determined by ASTM D1557. Aggregate base should conform to CAL TRANS
specifications and should be compacted to at least 95 percent of ASTM D1557.
7.0 LIMITATIONS OF INVESTIGATION
This investigation was performed using the degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under
similar circumstances, by reputable geotechnical consultants practicing in this or similar localities.
No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the conclusions and professional opinions
included in. this report.
The samples taken and used for testing and the observations made are believed representative
of the project site; however, soil and geologic conditions can vary significantly between borings.
As in most projects, conditions revealed by excavation may be at variance with preliminary
findings. If this occurs, the changed conditions must be evaluated by the geotechnical consultant
and additional recommendations made, if warranted.
This report is issued with the understanding· that it is· the responsibility of the owner, or of his
representative, to ensure that the information and recommendations contained herein are brought
to the attention of the necessary design consultants for the project and incorporated into the
. plans, and the necessary steps are taken to see that the contractors carry out such recommenda-
tions in the field.
The findings of this report are valid as of the present date. However, changes in the condition
of a property can occur with the passage of time, whether due to natural processes or the work
of man on this or adjacent properties. In addition, changes· in applicable or appropriate standards
of practice may occur from legislation or the broadening of knowledge. Accordingly, the findings
of this report may be invalidated wholly or partially by chang·es outside our control. Therefore,
this report is subject to review and should not be relied upon after a period of three years.
***
. r-
r-
,-.
! i
C B Commercial Real Estate Group
June 29, 1993
GEOTECHNICS INCORPORATED
~/.d.,e,3/'------
Anthony F. Belfast, P.E.40333
Principal
Project No. 0113-001-00
Doc. #3-0205
Page 12
Kenneth W. Shaw, C.E.G.1251
Project Geologist
,........
' '
~eotechnics·
lncorpo~ated --
June 29, 1993
CB Commercial Real Estate Group
5130 Avenida Encinas
Carlsbad, California 92008
ATTENTION: Mr. Doug Simpson
SUBJECT: REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
Proposed Commercial Buildings
Gentlemen:
2300, 2304, and 2308 Faraday Avenue
Carlsbad Research Center
Carlsbad, California
Principals:
Anthony F. Belfast
Michael P. Imbriglio
W. Lee Vanderhurst
Project No. 0113-001-00
Doc-. #3-0205
The following report presents the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of our geotechnical
investigation of the subject site. Our investigation encompassed three commercial building sites
with surrounding parking areas. In general, our findings indicate that the subject site is underlain
by a variable thickness of fill overlying bedrock of the Point Loma Formation. No geotechnical
conditions were apparent which would preclude the planned development of the lots. The major
geotechnical factors that will impact the proposed development are the high expansion potential
of the fill and bedrock materials, and the weathered condition of the surface soils. Such
conditions are common to _San Diego County. Recommendations are provided herein to mitigate
these conditions.
1.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF WORK
The purpose of our investigation was to evaluate the existing geologic conditions at the site as
they relate to the proposed improvements, and to make recommendations relating to the
geotechnical aspects of project design. The recommendations contained herein are based on
background research, a surface reconnaissance, subsurface exploration, laboratory testing, and
professional experience in the general site area. Design values may include presumptive
parameters based on professional judgement. Our scope 9f work was limited to:
P.O. Box 26500-224 • San Diego California • 92196
Phone (619) 536-1000 • Fax (619) 536-8311
,--
1
I
I
r I
C B Commercial Real Estate Group
June 29, 1993
Project No. 0113-001-00
Doc. #3-0205
Page 2
1. 1 Review of available literature related to general geotechnical conditions. We were
provided with a site plan prepared by Group One architects (SO-scale) and descriptions
of the project.
1.2 A visual reconnaissance of the site, excavation of four exploration borings, and
collection of soil samples to be used for laboratory testing.
1.3 Laboratory testing of selected soil samples to aid in evaluating strength properties,
expansive potential, reactivity, and to classify the soil.
1.4 Engineering analysis of the conditions encountered to development recommendations
for site preparation, foundation design, on-grade slabs, and earth retaining structures and
pavements.
1.5 Assessment of general seismic conditions and geologic hazards affecting the area,
and their likely impact on the project.
1.6 Preparation of this report.
2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION
The site consists of a relatively flat graded, vacant lot located north of Faraday Avenue. The lot
is bound to the east, west and south by developed commercial/industrial buildings and parking
lots. The northern boundary borders an ungraded natural area that slopes moderately to the
north. Elevations of the graded pad are not shown on the site plan, however, they are assumed
to reflect the sheet graded elevations of the Carlsbad Research Center (CRC) mass grading that
took place over 10 years ago. Evidence of underground utility lines .and street lights were
observed within the site. Grasses and weeds cover the site, with some minor amounts of trash
and building materials.
Prior to grading approximately 10 years ago, the building site consisted of a relatively flat ridge,
with adjacent descending canyons to the north-east and north-west. The referenced mass
grading plans indicate that a cut/fill line parallels the north limits of grading, and passes through
·r ! I
j
I !
C B Commercial Real Estate Group
June 29, 1993
Project No. 0113-001-00
Doc. #3-0205
Page 3
the northern two proposed buildings, however, these lines generally shift during grading and are
affected by the removal depth of unsuitable soils.
3.0 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
The proposed development will consist of three, one to two story, concrete tilt-up structures.
There were no specific building plans available at the time of our investigation. The approximate
locations of the proposed buildings are shown on the Site Plan (Plate 1). The base map used
for our site plan was prepared by Group One architects. The buildings will be surrounded by
asphalt-concrete paved parking lots. Minor grading may be required to adjust building pad and
parking lot grades. The anticipated loads for the structures will be typical for one to two story tilt-
up construction.
4.0 GEOLOGY AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
The geology and subsurface conditions were evaluated by reviewing available documents
pertinent to the site, and by drilling 4 borings. The borings were drilled with an 8-inch diameter
hollow-stem continuous flight auger drill rig. The maximum depth drilled was 32 feet below
existing grade. Our borings indicate that a variable thickness of fill overlies the Point Loma
Formation Bedrock, of approximately 4 to 6½ feet. The approximate location of the borings is
shown on Plate 1, Site Plan. The logs of the borings are presented in Appendix B. A description
of the specific units observed follows.
4.1 Point Loma Formation
The Point Loma Formation is typically characterized as an olive green-grey silty clay, that
is massive· to thickly bedded, and poorly to moderately cemented with local gypsum
seams. As encountered in the borings, the clay consisted of lean silty clay (CL). The
' Point Loma Formation exhibits low plasticity, is very dense, and is highly expansive.
,--
,--
' ' I
,--
r
APPENDIX A
REFERENCES
Algermissen, S. T., Perkins, D. M., Thenhaus, P. C., Hanson, S. L., and Bender, 8. L., 1982,
Probabilistic Estimates of Maximum Acceleration and Velocity in Rock in the Contiguous
United States: U. S. Geological Survey Open-file Report 82-1033, 99 p.
American Society for Testing and Materials, 1992, Annual Book of ASTM Standards. Section 4.
Construction. Volume 04.08 Soil and Rock: Dimension Stone: Geosynthetics, ASTM,
Philadelphia, PA, 1296 p.
Bowles, J. E., 1982, Foundation Analysis and Design, 3rd ed.: New York, McGraw Hill, 816 p.
California Division of Mines and Geology, 1975, Recommended Guidelines for Determining the
Maximum Credible and the Maximum Probable Earthquakes: California Division of Mines
and Geology Notes, Number 43.
Jennings, C. W., 1975, Fault Map of California: California Division of Mines and Geology,
California, Geologic Data Map Series.
Kennedy, M. P., and Peterson, G. L., 1975, Geology of San Metropolitan Area, California:
California Division of Mines and Geology Bulletin 200, 56 p.
Ploessel, M. R., and Slosson, J. E., 1974, Repeatable High Ground Accelerations for
· Earthquakes: California Geology, v. 27, no. 9, p. 195-199.
Rick Engineering Company, 1981, "Grading Plans for Carlsbad Tract No. 81-10, Carlsbad
Research Center", Sheet 11 of 13, Drawing No. 212-SA ·
Spangler, M. G., and Handy, R. L., 1982, Soil Engineering, 4th ed.: New York, Harper & Row,
819 p.
Wilson, K. L., 1972, Eocene and Related Geology of a Portion of the San Luis Rey and Encinitas
Quadrangles, San Diego County, California: M .. A. Thesis (unpublished), U. C. Riverside
r-
'
r-t
APPENDIX B
FIELD EXPLORATION
Field exploration consisted of a visual reconnaissance of the site and subsurface exploration.
Four borings were drilled using a truck mounted 8-inch diameter hollow stem, continuous flight
auger. The borings were advanced to a maximum depth of 32 feet. The approximate locations
of the borings are shown on Plate 1. Logs describing the subsurface conditions encountered are
presented in the Figures of Appendix B.
Samples were collected using a standard 1.5-inch (internal diameter), split-tube drive sampler.
The drive weight for samples collected during drilling with the hollow stem auger was a 140-pound
hammer with a free fall of 30 inches. For each sample we recorded the number of blows needed
to drive the sampler 6, 12, and 18 inches. The number of blows needed to drive the final 12
inches is shown on the attached logs under "blows per ft." Bulk samples were also obtained from
auger cuttings at selected intervals.
Borings were located by estimating using plans provided by Group One. The locations shown
should not be considered more accurate than is implied by the method of measurement used.
The lines designating the interface between soil and rock material on the boring logs are
determined by interpolation and are therefore approximations. The transition between the
materials may be abrupt or gradual. Further, soil conditions at locations between the borings may
be substantially different from those at the specific locations explored. It should be recognized
that the passage of time can result in changes in the soil conditions reported in our logs.
LOG OF EXPLORATION BORING NO. 1
Logged by KWS Date: 6/9/93
Method of Dri@J 8 Inch Hollow Stem Auger Elevation: Exist. Grd .
i=' ..: w w u:-';F. LI. ..J ..J 0 w 0: Q. Q. w w :E :E e:. I:. w < 0:
Q. < ~ ::, DESCRIPTION LAB TESTS :c Cl) Cl) Cl) ... ... :: w li&: u; Cl)
Q. ~ ..J z 0 w 0 0: ::, w :E Q ..J Q a) Q a)
1 FILL: Lean silty clay (CL-ML) low plasticity, oUve green-grey, moist, firm
to hard, mottled colors
2
3 23 mm 23 Spt
,--4 llilli
!
5 .. . . "'""" Grain Size :::::-:::,:
6 ~ Atterberg
Expansion
f
nm POINT LOMA FORMATION: Lean silty clay (CL-ML) low plasticity, olive green-grey,
8 74 Sp! 20 moist, hard to very hard, becomes moderately cemented at 25 feet . ,--
9
llllJj
10
11.
12
13 64 IIlll1 Sp!
14 lllilJ
15
16
.-17
18 82/ Sp!
10"
19
20
21
22
23 '
24 :
25
At 25 feet, slow drilling
26
27
28 ITillIT 92 Sp! Gypsum seams in sample
29 llilli
30 At 31.5 feet, very hard drilling
_.,.. ,otal Depth :,1. Feet, No water, No caving
,--PROJECT NO. 0113-001-00 GEOTECHNICS INCORPORATED FIGURE: B-1
Logged by KWS
Method of Drillin
~ ..: w w u:-~ .J .J (.) w a: Q. Q. w :E :E e:. !:. w < Q. < ~ :i: Cl) Cl) Cl)
I-3: w ~ Cl) Q. 0 i? .J z w c:: ::> w Q .J Q Ill Q Ill
1
2
illl1f 3 17 Spt
4' u
5
6
7
8 49 ~
1lllli 9
10
11
12
70/
13 r Spt
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
LOG OF EXPLORATION BORING NO. 2
8 Inch Hollow Stem Auger
Date: 6/9/93
Elevation: Exist. Grd •
~ . w a: ~ Cl)
0 :E
DESCRIPTION
FILL: Lean silty clay (CL-ML) low plasticity, olive green-grey, moist, firm
to hard
POINT LOMA FORMATION: Lean silty clay (CL-ML) low plasticity, olive green-grey,
moist, hard to very hard, homogenous
At 13 feet drilling refusal on cemented bedrock
Total Depth 13 Feet, No Water, No Caving
LAB TESTS
PROJECT NO. 0113-001-00 GEOTECHNICS INCORPORATED FIGURE: B-2
r I I
LOG OF EXPLORATION BORING NO. 3
Logged by KWS Date: 6/9/93
Method of DrilUn-8 Inch Hollow Stem Auger Elevation: Exist. Grd •
r=-..: w w u::-:J' u. -' -' t.) w IX 0. 0. !:. w w ::E ::E ~ w < 0::
0. < f: :::, DESCRIPTION LAB TESTS i= I Cl) Cl) ... w iii:: Cl) Cl)
0. g ~ -' z i5 w IX :::, w ::E C al C al C
1 FILL: Lean silty clay (CL-ML) low plasticity, olive green-grey, with slight
orange stains, moist, firm to hard
2
3 11 't 13 Expansion _p -l!1llll :: Sulfate
4 pH @ Resistivity
5
6 POINT LOMA FORMATION: Lean silty clay (CL-ML) low plasticity, olive green-grey,
with orange staining, moist, hard to very hard, homogenous
7
8 67 Sp! 23
9
10 At 10.5 feet hard drilling on cemented bedrock
11·
12
13 93 ~m
1111111
14
Total Depth 13.5 Feet, No Water, No Caving
15
16
17
18
19
20
. 21
22
' 23
24 I
25
26
27
28
29
30
PROJECT NO. 0113-001-00 GEOTECHNICS INCORPORATED FIGURE: B-3
Logged by KWS
Method of Drillin
i=-~ LLI LLI ii:" LI. ..J ..J 0 w a:: Q. Q. e:. LLI w :E :E ~ Q. ct ct ~ :z:: ~ C/) C/)
I-LLI ll::: ci> Q. 0 ~ ..J z w ii:: ::, w C ..J C m C m
1
2
1llIT 3 14 Spt
4 !llli1l
5
6
7
8 71 llll11 Spt
9 lllll
10
11
12
1llIT 13 91 Spt
lllil
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
LOG OF EXPLORATION BORING NO. 4
8 Inch Hollow Stem Auger
Date: 6/9/93
Elevation: Exist. Grd.
~
LLI a:: ::, I-C/)
0 :E
-DESCRIPTION
FILL: Lean silty clay (CL-ML) low plasticity, olive green-grey with orange
staining, moist, firm to hard, with asphalt fragments In fill
POINT LOMA FORMATION: Lean sllty clay (CL-ML) low plasticity, olive green-grey,
with orange staining, moist, hard to very hard, homogenous
Total Depth 13.5 Feet, No Water, No Caving
LAB TESTS
PROJECT NO. 0113-001-00 GEOTECHNICS INCORPORATED FIGURE: 8-4
,.......
I
,--
r-i '
APPENDIX C
LABORATORY TESTING
Selected representative samples of soils encountered were tested using test methods of the
American Society for Testing and Materials, or other generally accepted standards. A brief
description of the tests performed follows:
Classification: Soils were classified visually according to the Unified Soil Classification System.
Visual classification was supplemented by laboratory testing of selected samples and clas-
sification in accordance with ASTM 02487. The soil classifications are sh~wn on the Boring
Logs.
Expansion Index: The expansion potential of selected soils was characterized by using the test
method ASTM D 4829. Figure C-3 provides the results of the tests.
Particle Size Analysis: Particle size analysis were performed in accordance with ASTM 0422.
Th~ results are provided on the following Figure C-1.
Sulfate Content: To assess their potential for reactivity with concre!e, a representative sample
was tested for c;ontent of water.,soluble sulfate minerals using CAL TRANS method 417 (Part I).
The results are listed in Figure C-2.
pH and Resistivity: To assess their potential for reactivity with metal pipe, a representative
sample was tested for pH and resistivity, using California Test Method 643. The results are listed
in Figure· C-2.
In-Situ Moisture: The in-place moisture content of selected samples were determined using
standard penetration samples recovered from the drilling. The moisture contents are shown on
the Bor!ng Logs.
. -· · 1 . l "l ·r
U.S. Standard Sieve Opening in Inches U.S. Stenderd Sieve Numbers Hydrometer
100 6 4 3 2 1½ 1 ¾ ½3/8 3 4 6 8·101416 20 30 40 50 70 100140 200
.c C,
90 I
80 )
n 70
-~ 60 ~
> m
~ 50 £ IL
i: ~ 40
~ .. IL
30
20
10
0500
EXPLORATION
NUMBER
B1@5'
I
Cobbles
ELEVATION
OR DEPTH
I II I I 1~11 11 I I I I II I I
•
"" r-.. -.... r-... ~ -~ ' 1-,_ i--.-
i
I
I
!
I I
' I
100 50 10 5 1 0.6
Grain Size in Millimeters
Gravel I Send
C::.oer~_L_____F ine j Coersl! I Medium
PLOT UNIFIED SOIL
SYMBO CLASSIFICATION
CL Fine sandy CLAY
GEOTECHNICS INCORPORATED L PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS -. .
I I I II
-.......
""r-,.
I"-
' • --I"-. ",,
i ~
r,..,
< ...._
0.1 0.05 0.01 0.005
Slit or Cley
SAMPLE
DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NOO 1 1 1 -n n 1 -n
...
0
-
.. 1 0
2
3
•
!
.. .,
!
0
0
j; .. -;
0 ~
> m
0 ~ • 0 0 ..
C 0 ..
0
0
0
0
~ II IL
1 00
0.001
PLASTICITY
LL PL
46 19
FIGURF ,-, 1
..
~
Pl
26
r;
i
! .
TITLE 24 REPORT FOR:
CARLSBAD PRINTING SERVICE
FARADAY BUSINESS PARK
CARLSBAD I CA
PROJECT DESIGNER:
REPORT PREPARED BY:
SLAYTON MECHANICAL CONT
Slayton Mechanical Contractors,
10199 Riverford Rd "C"
Lakeside, CA 92040
(619) 449-1272
Job Number: 10920
Date: 2/16/1998
Inc.
The COMPLY 24 computer program has been used to perform the calculations
summarized in this compliance report. This program has approval and is
authorized by the California Energy Commission for use with both the
Residential and Nonresidential Building Energy Efficiency Standards.
)
Table Of Contents for Title 24 Report
Cover Page 1
Table of Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Form ENV-1 Envelope Certificate of Compliance ....................... 3
Form ENV-2 Prescriptive Envelope Summary ............................ 5
Form ENV-3 Construction Assemblies 9
Form LTG-1 Lighting Certificate of Compliance ....................... 14
Form LTG-2 Prescriptive Lighting Compliance Summary ............ : · .... 16
Form LTG-3 Lighting Controls Credit Worksheet ....................... 17
Form MECH-1 Mechanical Certificate of Compliance .................... 18
Form MECH-2 Prescriptive Mechanical Summary ......................... 21
Form MECH-3 Mechanical Equipment Summary ............................ 24
-Form MECH-4 Mechanical Ventilation .................................. 25
}
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE -Envelope (part 1 of 2)
Project Name: CARLSBAD PRINTING SERVICE
ENV-1 page 3 of 25
Date: 2/16/1998
Address: FARADAY BUSINESS PARK-
CARLSBAD, CA
Envelope
Building Permit No
Designer:
Documentation: Slayton Mechanical Contractors, Inc.
Checked by/ Date
COMPLY 24 User 4283
GENERAL INFORMATION
Date of Plans:
Building Type: Nonresidential
Building Conditioned Floor Area:
Climate Zone:
735 sf
7
Phase of Construction: 0 New Construction O Addition O Alteration
Method of Envelope Compliance: Prescriptive -Overall Envelope
STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
This Certificate of Compliance lists the Building features and performance
specifications needed to comply with Title 24, Parts 1 and 6 of the Calif-
ornia Code of Regulations. This certificate applies only to building
envelope requirements.
The documentation preparer hereby certifies that the documentation is
accurate and complete.
DOCUMENTATION AUTHOR
SLAYTON MECHANICAL CONT
(619) 449-1272 (Signature) (Date)
The Principal Envelope Designer hereby certifies that the proposed build-
ing design represented in this set of ·construction documents is consistent
with the other compliance forms and worksheets, with the specifications,
and with any other calculations submitted with this permit application.
The proposed building has been designed to meet the envelope requirements
contained in sections 110, 116 through 118, and 140, 142, 143 or 149 of
Title 24, Part 6, Chapter 1.
Please check one:
0 I hereby affirm that I am eligible under the provisions of Division 3
of the Business and Professions Code to sign this document as the
person responsible for its preparition; and that I am a civil engineer
or architect.
0 I affirm that I am eligible under the exemption to Division 3 of the
Business and Professions Code by Section 5537.2 of the Business and
Professions Code to sign this document as the person responsible for
its preparation; and that I am a licensed·contractor preparing docu-
ments for work that I have contracted to perform.
O I affirm that I am eligible under the exemption to Division 3 of the
Business and Professions Code by Section ____ of the
Code to sign this document as the person responsible for its
preparation; and for the following reason: ----------------
PRINCIPAL ENVELOPE DESIGNER
(Signature) (Lie. #) (Date)
ENVELOPE MANDATORY MEASURES
Indicate location on plans of Note Block for Mandatory Measures:
):
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE -Envelope (part 2 of 2)
Project Name: CARLSBAD PRINTING SERVICE
Documentation: Slayton Mechanical Contractors, Inc.
Const OPAQUE SURFACES
Assembly Name Type Location/Comments
7.25" CONCRETE WALL None
R-13 Metal Stud Wall Metal
R-19 OVER TILE None
R-19 Floor(F.19.2x8.16) Wood
Hollow Wood Door None
FENESTRATION Frame
Orient Panes Type Exterior Shade
-----------------------------------------
Interior 1 Metal None
Front (N) 1 Metal None
OH
N
N
ENV-1 page 4 of 25
Date: 2/16/1998
COMPLY 24 User 4283
Note to
Field
Glazing Type ..
-----------------------
FORD ROYAL BLUE
FORD ROYAL BLUE
J
OVERALL ENVELOPE METHOD (part 1 of 4)
Project Name: CARLSBAD PRINTING SERVICE
Documentation: Slayton Mechanical Contractors., Inc.
WINDOW AREA TEST
A. Display Perimeter 0.0 ft X 6 ft =
B. Gross Exterior Wall Area 180.0 sf X 0.40 =
C. Gross Exterior Wall Area 180.0 sf X 0.10 =
D. Enter Larger of A or B
E. Enter Proposed Window Area
If Eis greater than Dor less than C, proceed to
for window area adjustment.
1. If Eis greater than D:
D. Maximum Standard Area
N/A
2. If Eis less than C:
C. Minimum Standard Area
N/A
SKYLIGHT AREA TEST
If not, go to part
I
I
E. Proposed Area
N/A
E. Proposed Area
N/A
2
=
=
ENV-2 page 5 of 25
Date: 2/16/1998
COMPLY 24 User 4283
0.0 sf Display Area
72.0 sf 40% Area
18.0 sf Min Std Area
72.0 sf Max Std Area
60.0 sf Proposed Area
the next calculation
of 4.
Window
Adjustment Factor
N/A
Window
Adjustment Factor
N/A -
Atrium Height
0.0 ft
If Height< 55 ft
Standard= 5% ----------+----------If Height>= 55 ft
Standard= 10%
1
V
A. Gross Exterior Roof Area 735.0 sf X 0.05 = 36.8 sf Standard Area
B. Enter Proposed Skylight Area 0.0 sf Proposed Area
If the Proposed Skylight Area is greater than the Standard Skylight Area,
proceed to the next calculation for the skylight area adjustment. If not
got to part 2 of 4.
1. If Proposed Skylight Area> Standard Skylight Area:
Standard Skylight Area
N/A I
Proposed Skylight Area
N/A =
Skylight
Adjustment Factor
N/A
t 'j.
OVERALL ENVELOPE METHOD (part 2 of 4)
Project Name: CARLSBAD PRINTING SERVICE
Documentation: Slayton Mechanical Contractor~, Inc.
OVERALL HEAT LOSS
PROPOSED
Assembly Name Area HC U-Val UxA ----------------------------------------
7.25" CONCRETE WALL 120.0 16.9 0.699 83.9
R-19 OVER TILE 735.0 0.5 0.044 32.5
FORD ROYAL BLUE 24.0 N/A 1.010 24.2
FORD ROYAL BLUE 24.0 N/A 1. 010 24.2
FORD ROYAL BLUE 12.0 N/A 1.010 12.1
------
Total 177.0
** OVERALL HEAT LOSS COMPLIES PROPOSED
ENV-2 page 6 of 25
Date: 2/16/1998
COMPLY 24 User 4283
Adj. STANDARD
Area U-Val UxA
-----------------
120.0 0.690 82.8
735.0 0.078 57.3
24.0 1.230 29.5
24.0 1.230 29.5
12.0 1.230 14.8
------
Total 213.9
UA <= STANDARD UA **
J
OVERALL ENVELOPE METHOD (part 3 of 4)
Project Name: CARLSBAD PRINTING SERVICE
Documentation: Slayton Mechanical Contractors,-Inc.
ENV-2 page 7 of 25
Date: 2/16/1998
COMPLY 24 User 4283
-----·~--------------------------------------------------------------------
OVERALL HEAT GAIN
Glazing
North
North
North
WF
0.34
0.34
0.34
PROPOSED
Area SC H
24.0 0.60
24.0 0.60
12.0 0.60
** OVERALL HEAT GAIN COMPLIES
V
STANDARD
OHF Total Area RSHG Total
-------------------
4.9 24.0 0.94 7.7
4.9 24.0 0.94 7.7
2.4 12.0 0.94 3.8
-------------
Total 12.2 Total 19.2
PROPOSED HG<= STANDARD HG**
OVERALL ENVELOPE METHOD (part 4 of 4)
Project Name: CARLSBAD PRINTING SERVICE
Documentation: Slayton Mechanical Contractors-, Inc.
Window Area Adjustment Calculations
Wall Name
ZONE 1 NORTH
Gross
Dir Area
N
TOTALS
180.0
180.0
Skylight Area Adjustment Calculations
Roof Name
Gross
Dir Area
Door
Area
------
------
0.0
Window
Area
------
60.0
------
60.0
Skylt
Area
ENV-2 page 8 of 25
Date: 2/16/1998
COMPLY 24 User 4283
Adjust
Factor
------
1.0000
Adjust
Factor
Adjusted
Window Wall
Area Area
------------
60.0 120.0
------------
60.0 120.0
Adj'usted
Skylt Roof
Area Area
ZONE l CEILING H
TOTALS
735.0
735.0
0.0 0.0000
0.0
0.0
0.0
735.0
735.0
1. J.
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ASSEMBLY ENV-3 page 9 of 25
Project Name: CARLSBAD PRINTING SERVICE
Documentation: Slayton Mechanical Contractors-, Inc.
Date: 2/16/1998
COMPLY 24 User 4283
COMPONENT DESCRIPTION
Sketch of Construction Assembly
ASSEMBLY U-VALUE
Construction Components
Outside Air Film
1. Concrete, 140 lb, Not Dried
2.
3 .
4.
5.
6.
7.
8 •
9 .
Inside Air Film
ADJUSTMENT FOR FRAMING
Assembly Name: 7.25" CONCRETE WALL
Assembly Type: Wall
Assembly Tilt: 90 deg (Vertical)
Framing Material: None
Framing Spacing: "O.C.
Framing Percent: 0.0 ~
Absorptivity: 0.00
Roughness: Abort
Th
Fr (in)
R-Value
7.250
Unadjusted R-Values
Cavity Frame
0.17
0.58
0.68
1.43
0.17
0.58
0.68
1.43
(1 / 1.43) X (1.00) + (1 / 1.43) X (0.00) = 0.699
Weight:
Heat Capacity:
84.6 lb/sqft
16.92
TOTAL U-VALUE = 0.699
=====
TOTAL R-VALUE = 1.43
=====
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ASSEMBLY ENV-3 page 10 of : 1 --------------------------------------------------------------------------
Project Name: CARLSBAD PRINTING SERVICE
Documentation: Slayton Mechanical Contractors, Inc.
Date: 2/16/1998
COMPLY 24 User 428
COMPONENT DESCRIPTION
Sketch of Construction Assembly
ASSEMBLY U-VALUE
Construction Components
Outside Air Film
1. Stucco
2. Plywood
3. Insulation, Mineral Fiber, R-13
4. Gypsum or Plaster Board
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Inside Air Film
Assembly Name: R-13 Metal Stud Wall
Assembly Type: Wall
Assembly Tilt: 90 deg (Vertical)
Framing Material: Metal
Framing Spacing: II 0.C.
Framing Percent: 15.0 ~
Absorptivity: 0.70
Roughness: Stucco, Wood Shingles
Th
Fr (in)
0.875
0.438
* 3.500
0.500
Unadjusted R-Values
R-Value
Cavity Frame
0 .. 17
0.17
0.54
13 .. 00
0.45
0.68
15.02
0.17
0.17
0.54
13.0p
0.45
0.68
0.00
TOTAL U-VALUE = 0.182
=====
TOTAL R-VALUE = 5.49
=====
Weight:
Heat Capacity:
12.0 lb/sqft
2.62
. ·:
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ASSEMBLY
Project Name: CARLSBAD PRINTING SERVICE
Documentation: Slayton Mechanical Contractors-, Inc.
ENV-3 page 11 of 25
Date: 2/16/1998
COMPLY 24 User 4283
COMPONENT DESCRIPTION Assembly Name: R-19 OVER TILE
Assembly Type: Roof
Assembly Tilt: 0 deg (Horizontal Roof)
Sketch of Construction Assembly
ASSEMBLY U-VALUE
Framing Material: None
Framing Spacing: "O.C.
Framing Percent: 0.0 %
Absorptivity: 0.00
Roughness: Abort
Th
Fr ( in)
R-Value
Construction Components
Outside Air Film
1. Acoustical Tile, Interior Finish
2. Insulation, Mineral Fiber, R-19
3 •
4.
5.
6.
7.
8 •
9 .
Inside Air Film
Cavity Frame
0.17
1.000 2.86
6.000 19.00
0.17
2.86
19.00
Unadjusted R-Values
0.61
22.64
0.61
22.64
ADJUSTMENT FOR FRAMING
(1 /22.64) X (1.00) + (1 /22.64) X (0.00)
Weight:
Heat Capacity:
1. 5 lb/sqft
0.45
0.044
TOTAL U-VALUE = 0.044
=====
TOTAL R-VALUE = 22.64
=====
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ASSEMBLY
Project Name: CARLSBAD PRINTING SERVICE
Documentation: Slayton Mechanical Contractors-; Inc.
ENV-3 page 12 of 25
Date: 2/16/1998
COMPLY 24 User 4283
COMPONENT DESCRIPTION
Sketch of Construction Assembly
ASSEMBLY U-VALUE
Construction Components
Outside Air Film
1. Insulation, Mineral Fiber, R-19
2. Plywood '
3. Flooring, Carpet and Fibrous Pad
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Inside Air Film
Assembly Name: R-19 Floor(F.19.2x8.16)
Assembly Type: Floor
Assembly Tilt: 180 deg (Horizontal Floor)
Framing Material: Wood
Framing Spacing: II 0.C.
Framing Percent: 10.0 %
Absorptivity: 0.70
Roughness: Stucco, Wood Shingles
Th
Fr (in)
* 6.000
0.625
0.250
R-Value
Cavity Frame
0.17
19.00
0.77
2.08
0.17
5.94
0.77
2.08
Unadjusted R-Values
0.92
22.95
0.92
9.89
ADJUSTMENT FOR FRAMING
(1 /22.95) X (0.90) + (1 / 9.89) X (0.10)
Weight:
Heat Capacity:
3.9 lb/sqft
1.27
== 0.049
TOTAL U-VALUE = 0.049 ----------
TOTAL R-VALUE = 20.27
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ASSEMBLY
Project Name: CARLSBAD PRINTING SERVICE
Documentation: Slayton Mechanical Contractors-; Inc.
ENV-3 page 13 of 25
Date: 2/16/1998
COMPLY 24 User 4283
COMPONENT DESCRIPTION
Sketch of Construction Assembly
ASSEMBLY U-VALUE
Construction Components
Outside Air Film
1. Softwood, Douglas Fir-Larch
2 . Air' Space
3. Softwood, Douglas Fir-Larch
4.
5.
6.
7.
8 .
9 .
Inside Air Film
ADJUSTMENT FOR FRAMING
Assembly Name: Hollow Wood Door
Assembly Type: Door
Assembly Tilt: 90 deg (Vertical)
Framing Material: None
Framing Spacing: "O.C.
Framing Percent: 0.0 %
Absorptivity: 0.70
Roughness: Glass, Paint on Pine
Th
Fr (in)
R-Value
0.125
1. 500
0.125
Unadjusted R-Values
Cavity Frame
0.17
0.12
0.87
0.12
0.68
1. 97
0.17
0.12
0.87
0.12
0.68
1. 97
(1 / 1:.97) X (1.00} + (1 / 1.97) X (0.00) 0.508
Weight:
Heat Capacity:
0.7 lb/sqft
0.28
TOTAL U-VALUE == 0.508
=====
TOTAL R-VALUE == 1.97
=====
\
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE -Lighting (part 1 of 2)
Project Name: CARLSBAD PRINTING SERVICE
Address: FARADAY BUSINESS PARK
CARLSBAD, CA
Lighting
Designer:
Documentation: Slayton Mechanical Contractors, Inc.
LTG-1 page 14 of 25
Date: 2/16/1998
Building Permit No
Checked by/ Date
COMPLY 24 User 4283
GENERAL INFORMATION
Date of Plans: Building Conditioned Floor Area: 735 sf
Building Type: Nonresidential Climate Zone: 7
Phase of Construction: 0 New Construction
Method of Lighting Compliance: Prescriptive
STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
O Addition 6-lteration
This Certificate of Compliance lists the Building features and performance
specifications needed to comply with Title 24, Parts 1 and 6 of the Calif-
ornia Code of Regulations. This certificate applie's only to building
lighting requirements.
The documentation preparer hereby certifies that the documentation is
accurate and complete.
DOCUMENTATION AUTHOR
SLAYTON MECHANICAL CONT
(619) 449-1272 (Signature)
GP 2,--/ {R,--l:j(J
(Date)
The Principal Lighting Designer hereby certifies that the proposed build-
ing design represented in this set of construction documents is consistent
with the other compliance forms and worksheets, with the specifications,
and with any other calculations submitted with this permit application.
The proposed building has been designed to meet the lighting requirements
contained in sections 110, 119, 130 through 132 and 146 or 149.
Please check one:
0 I hereby affirm that I am eligible under the provisions of Division 3
of the Business and Professions Code to sign this document as the
person responsible for its preparation; and that I am a civil engineer
electrical engineer or architect.
O I affirm that I am eligible under the exemption to Division 3 of the
Business and Professions Code by Section 5537.2 of the Business and
Professions Code to sign this document as the person responsible for
its preparation; and that I am a licensed contractor preparing docu-
ments for work that I have contracted to perform.
O I affirm that I am eligible under the exemption to Division 3 of the
Business and Professions Code by Section ____ of the
Code to sign this document as the person responsible for its
preparation; and for the following reason: ----------------
PRINCIPAL LIGHTING DESIGNER
l • ' ).
(Signature) (Lie. #) (Date)
LIGHTING MANDATORY MEASURES
Indicate location on plans of Note Block for Mandatory Measures:
. '/
l \
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE -Lighting (part 2 of 2)
Project Name: CARLSBAD PRINTING SERVICE
Documentation: Slayton Mechanical Contractorsi Inc.
LTG-1 page 15 of 25
Date: 2/16/1998
COMPLY 24 User 4283
INSTALLED LIGHTING SCHEDULE
No of
Name Lamp Type Lamps
-----------------------
A Fluorescent 3
MANDATORY AUTOMATIC CONTROLS
Control
Watts/ Ballast Ballasts/
Lamp Type Luminaire
-------------------------
34 Standard 1.5
Control Location ID Control Type Zone Controlled
CONTROLS FOR CREDIT
Control
Control Location ID Control Type Zone Controlled
Automatic Time SwZONE 1
No of
Fixt.
-----
11
Note to
Field
-------
Note to
Field
Note to
Field
LIGHTING COMPLIANCE SUMMARY
Project Name: CARLSBAD PRINTING SERVICE
Documentation: Slayton Mechanical Contractors; Inc.
LTG-2 page 16 of 25
Date: 2/16/1998
COMPLY 24 User 4283
ACTUAL LIGHTING POWER
No of Watts Total
Name Description Lumin per Default Watts
A 48" T-12 Low Watt /3 Lamp (Tandem) 11 108.0 1188.0
SubTotal 1188
Less Control Credits (LTG-3) 59
Total Proposed Watts 1129
* If not CEC Default value, please provide supporting documentation.
ALLOWED LIGHTING POWER BY ZONE
Zone Name Occupancy
Allowed
Floor LPD
Area (w/sf)
Total Tailored
(watts) (watts)
ZONE 1 Comp Bldg Office 735 1.500 1103 0
TOTALS 735 1.500 1103 0
* Note: Tailored Allotment requires supporting documentation on form LTG-4.
·1 )l ).
LIGHTING CONTROLS CREDIT WORKSHEET
Project Name: CARLSBAD PRINTING SERVICE
Documentation: Slayton Mechanical Contractors~ Inc.
LIGHTING CONTROLS BY ZONE
LTG-3 page 17 of 25
Date: 2/16/1998
COMPLY 24 User 4283
Floor Watts Adj. Control
Zone Name Control Description Area Ctrld Fctr Credit
ZONE 1 Automatic Time Switch 735
TOTAL
1188 0.050 59
59
; , l )_
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE -Mechanical (part 1 of 3)
Project Name: CARLSBAD PRINTING SERVICE
.Address: FARADAY BUSINESS PARK
CARLSBAD, CA
Mechanical
Designer:
Documentation: Slayton Mechanical Contractors, Inc.
MECH-1 page 18 of 25
Date: 2/16/1998
Building Permit No
Checked by/ Date
COMPLY 24 User 4283
GENERAL INFORMATION
Date of Plans: Building Conditioned Floor Area: 735 sf
Building Type: Nonresidential Climate Zone: 7
Phase of Construction: O New Construction O Addition efAlteration
Method of Mechanical Compliance: Prescriptive
Proof of Envelope Compliance: O Previous Permit O Complianc·e· Attached
STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
This Certificate of Compliance lists the Building features and performance
specifications needed to comply with Title 24, Parts 1 and 6 of the Calif-
ornia Code of Regulations. This certificate applies only to building
mechanical requirements.
The documentation preparer hereby certifies that the documentation is
accurate and complete.
DOCUMENTATION AUTHOR
SLAYTON MECHANICAL CONT
(619) 449-1272
(U
(Signature) (Date)
The=Principal Mechanical Designer hereby certifies that the proposed build-
ing,design represented in this set of construction documents is consistent
with the other compliance forms and worksheets, with the specifications,
and with any other calculations submitted with this permit application.
The proposed Building has been designed to meet the mechanical requirements
contained in sections 110 through 115, 120 through 124, 140 through 142,
144 and 145.
Please check one:
O ,I hereby affirm that I am eligible under the provisions of Division 3
of the Business and Professions Code to sign this document as the
person responsible for its preparation; and that I am a civil engineer
mechanical engineer or architect.
/I affirm that I am eligible under the exemption to Division 3 of the
Business and Professions Code by Section 5537.2 of the Business and
Professions Code to sign this document as the person responsible for
its preparation; and that I am a licensed contractor preparing docu-
ments for work that I have contracted to perform.
0 I affirm that I am eligible under the exemption to Division 3 of the
Business and Professions Code by Section ____ of the
Code to sign this document as the person responsible for its
preparation; and for the following reason: _______________ _
I II ) PRINCIPAL MECHANICAL DESIGNER
(Signature) (Lie. #) (DatE
. .: . -~:· .
MECHANICAL MANDATORY MEASURES'
Indicate location on plans of Note Block for Mandatory Measures:
: · ...
__ ··_:ij\·:
t J' ).
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE -Mechanical (part 2 of 3)
Project Name: CARLSBAD PRINTING SERVICE
Documentation: Slayton Mechanical Contractorsi Inc.
MECH-1 page 19 of 25
Date: 2/16/1998
COMPLY 24 User 4283
SYSTEM FEATURES
Zone Name
Time Control
Setback Control
#of Isolation Zones
HP Thermostat
Electric Heat
Fan Control
VAV Min Position
Simul. Heat/Cool
Heat Supply Reset
Cool Supply Reset
Ventilation
OA Damper Control
Economizer Type
Outdoor Air CFM
Heat Equip Type
Make & Model No.
Cool Equip Type
Make and Model
Zone Name
Time Control
Setback Control
#of Isolation Zones
HP Thermostat
Electric Heat
Fan Control
VAV Min Position
Simul. Heat/Cool
Heat Supply Reset
Cool Supply Reset
Ventilation
OA Damper Control
Economizer Type
Outdoor Air CFM
Heat Equip Type
Make & Model No.
Cool Equip Type
Make and Model
Code Tables
Time Control
S:Prog Switch
O:Occ Sensor
M:Man Timer
HP-1
None
n/a
Yes
0.0 KW
Constant Volume
n/a
n/a
Constant Temp
Constant Temp
No Economizer
110
Heat Pump
ZONE 2 EXISTING OFFICE
None
n/a
n/a
n/a
Constant Volume
n/a
n/a
Constant Temp
Constant Temp
No Economizer
0
DAY & NIGHT 654BO36
DX
Gas Furnace
Undefined
DX
ZONE 3 WAREHOUSE
None
n/a
n/a
n/a
Constant Volume
n/a
n/a
Constant Temp
Constant Temp
No Economizer
0
Gas Furnace
Undefined
DX
Ventilation
B:Air Balance
C:OA Cert.
M:OA Measure
D:Demand Cont
N:Natural
OA Damper
A:Auto
G:Gravity
Note to
Field
l tt ).
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE -Mechanical (part 3 of 3)
Project Name: CARLSBAD PRINTING SERVICE
Documentation: Slayton Mechanical Contractors, Inc.
DUCT INSULATION
System Name Type Duct Location
DAY & NIGHT 654BO36 Heating Ducts in Attic
Cooling Ducts in Attic
Undefined Heating Ducts in Attic
Cooling Ducts in Attic
Undefined Heating Ducts in Attic
Cooling Ducts in Attic
PIPE INSULATION Insul
System Name Pipe Type Required
Domestic Hot Water
Undefined
Undefined
y I N
y IN
y I N
NOTES TO FIELD -For Building Department Use Only
MECH-1 page 20 of 25
Date: 2/16/1998
COMPLY 24 User 4283
Duct Tape Insul Note to
Allowed R-Val Field
-------------------
y I N 4.2
y I N 4.2
y I N 4.2
y I N 4.2
y I N 4.2
y I N 4.2
Note to
Field
-------
MECHANICAL SIZING AND FAN POWER
Project Name: CARLSBAD PRINTING SERVICE
Documentation: Slayton Mechanical Contractorsi Inc.
MECH-2 page 21 of 25
Date: 2/16/1998
COMPLY 24 User 4283
SIZING AND EQUIPMENT SELECTION
HVAC System Name:
Heating System Name:
Cooling System Name:
System Multiplier:
Peak Load Method:
Relative Humidity:
1. DESIGN CONDITIONS FOR Carlsbad
2. SIZING
Btu/hr
-------
HP-1
DAY & NIGHT 654BO36
HEATING
38 F
PEAK
1
COINCIDENT
50 %
COOLING
SENSIBLE LATENT
83 F 68 F
Btu/hr
--------
ZONES SERVED BY SYSTEM
ZONE 1
PEAK
(Jan 12am) 23726 (Aug 3pm) 25267
Btu/hr
10925
10925 TOTAL Zone LOAD
Duct Gain$ & Losses:
Ventilation: ( 110 CFM)
Return Air Lighting Gain
Supply/Return Fan Ga~n:
TOTAL'SYSTEM LOAD
3. SELECTION
A. Safety/Warmup Factor
B. Maximum Adjusted Load
C. Installed Equipment Capacity
-------
23726
2373
4042
0
-------
30140
1.43
43101
14263
110 CFM)
--------
25267
2527
1308
0
0
--------
29101
1. 21
35213
34221
1492
12417
0
If Line 3-C > Line 3-B, Explain: ---------------------
FAN POWER CONSUMPTION
Fan Description
Supply Fan
FAN POWER DEMAND
No.
Sys BHP
Efficiency
Motor Drive
1 X 0.50 / [0.70 X 1.00]
Totals
=
Peak
HP
-----
0.71
-----
0.71
Conv Peak
Fact Watts
-----
X 746 = 533
-----
533
533 watts/ 1200 cfm = 0.444 watts/cfm
Supply
CFM
------
1200
------
1200
MECHANICAL SIZING AND FAN POWER
Project Name: CARLSBAD PRINTING SERVICE
Documentation: Slayton Mechanical Contractors, Inc.
MECH-2 page 22 of 25
Date: 2/16/1998
COMPLY 24 User 4283
SIZING AND EQUIPMENT SELECTION
HVAC System Name:
Heating System Name:
Cooling System Name:
System Multiplier:
Peak Load Method:
Relative Humidity:
1. DESIGN CONDITIONS FOR Carlsbad
2. SIZING
ZONES SERVED BY SYSTEM
ZONE 2
PEAK
(Jan 12am)
TOTAL Zone LOAD
Duct Gains & Losses:
Ventilation: ( 112 CFM)
Return Air Lighting Gain
Supply/Return Fan Gain:
TOTAL SYSTEM LOAD
3. SELECTION
A. Safety/Warmup Factor
B. Maximum Adjusted Load
C. Installed Equipment Capacity
Btu/hr
-------
0
-------
0
0
-4582
0
-------
-4582
1.43
-6552
0
ZONE 2 EXISTING OFFICE
Undefined
HEATING
38 F
PEAK
(Aug 12am)
0 CFM)
1
COINCIDENT
50 %
COOLING
SENSIBLE LATENT
83 F
Btu/hr
--------
0
--------
0
0
0
0
0
--------
0
1. 21
0
0
68 F
Btu/hr
0
0
0
0
0
If Line 3-C > Line 3-B, Explain: ____________________ _
FAN POWER CONSUMPTION
Fan Description
No.
Sys BHP
Efficiency
Motor Drive
-----------
Totals
Peak Conv Peak Supply
HP Fact Watts CFM
----------------
----------------
0.00 0 0
FAN POWER DEMAND O watts/ 0 cfm = 0.000 watts/cfm
MECHANICAL SIZING AND FAN POWER MECH-2 page 23 of 25 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Project Name: CARLSBAD PRINTING SERVICE
Documentation: Slayton Mechanical Contractors, Inc.
Date: 2/16/1998
COMPLY 24 User 4283
SIZING AND EQUIPMENT SELECTION
HVAC System Name:
Heating System Name:
Cooling System Name:
System Multiplier:
Peak Load Method:
Relative Humidity:
1. DESIGN CONDITIONS FOR Carlsbad
2. SIZING
ZONES SERVED BY SYSTEM
ZONE 3
PEAK
(Jan 12am)
TOTAL Zone LOAD
Duct Gains & Losses:
Ventilation: ( 238 CFM)
Return Air Lighting Gain
Supply/Return Fan Gain:
TOTAL SYSTEM LOAD
3. SELECTION
A. Safety/Warmup Factor
B. Maximum Adjusted Load
C. Installed Equipment Capacity
If Line 3-C > Line 3-B, Explain:
FAN POWER CONSUMPTION
Fan Description
No.
Sys BHP
ZONE 3 WAREHOUSE
Undefined
Btu/hr
-------
0
-------
0
0
-9735
0 -------
. -9735
1.43
-13922
0
HEATING
38 F
PEAK
(Aug 12am)
0 CFM)
1
COINCIDENT
50 %
COOLING
SENSIBLE LATENT
83 F
Btu/hr
--------
0
--------
0
0
0
0
0
--------
0
1.21
0
0
<
68 F
Btu/hr
0
0
0
0
0
---------------------
Efficiency Peak
Motor Drive HP
Totals 0.00
Conv
Fact
Peak Supply
Watts CFM
-----------
-----------
0 0
FAN POWER DEMAND 0 watts/ O cfm = 0.000 watts/cfm
MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SUMMARY
Project Name: CARLSBAD PRINTING SERVICE
Documentation: Slayton Mechanical Contractorsi Inc.
MECH-3 page 24 of 25
Date: 2/16/1998
COMPLY 24 User 4283
CENTRAL SYSTEM SUMMARY
Sys
No System Name System Type
No
Sys Economizer Type
1 DAY & NIGHT 654BO36 Packaged Heat Pu 1 No Economizer
CENTRAL SYSTEM RATINGS
Sys-------Heating----------------------------------Cooling-----------
No Type Output Aux KW EFF Type Output Sensible EER SEER
1 Heat Pump 17400 0.0 6.60 DX
CENTRAL FAN SUMMARY------------Supply
Sys
Fan
35600 35600 8.60 10.10
-----------Return Fan
Mtr Drv Mtr Drv
No Fan Type Motor Location CFM BHP Eff Eff CFM BHP Eff Eff
------
1 Constant Volume Draw-Through 1200 0.50
ZONAL FAN SUMMARY
Zone Name
None
BOILER SUMMARY
System Name -----------------------
Std Gas 50 gal or Less
---------Zonal Fan
Mtr
No CFM BHP Eff
AFUE
/Rec
System Type Eff
-----------
DomesticHW 0.780
Drv
Eff
Rated
Input
-----
40000
----------------
70 100 None
-------Exhaust Fan -----
Mtr Drv
No CFM BHP Eff Eff
-----------
Stdby Volume
Loss EF (gals)
----------------
0.040 0.529 50
MECHANICAL VENTILATION
Project Name: CARLSBAD PRINTING SERVICE
Documentation: Slayton Mecha.nical Contractors,, Inc.
VENTILATION SUMMARY BY ZONE
Floor sqft
Zone Name T Occupancy Area /Occ ------------------------------------------
ZONE 1 Comp Bldg Offi 735 100
MECH-4 page 25 of 25
Date: 2/16/1998
COMPLY 24 User 4283
Tran
CFM Dsg Min sfer
/Occ CFM CFM CFM
------
15.0 110 110 0
------
TOTALS 110 110
Tailored OA (T=*) requires supporting documentation on MECH-5, Tailored
Ventilation and Process Loads Worksheet