The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2312 KIMBERLY CT; ; CB990456; Permit~Njo 06/28/1999 City of Carlsbad Residential Permit Permit No:CB990456 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 438-3101 2312 KIMBERLY CT CBAD RESDNTL Sub Type: RAD Status: ISSUED 1675313300 Lot #: 0 Applied: 02/01/1999 $82,516.00 Construction Type: VN Entered By: DT 27 Reference #: Plan Approved: 05/07/1999 0 Structure Type: Issued: 06/28/1999 0 Bathrooms: 0 Inspect Area: MARVER ADDITION Orig PC#: 842SF ROOM ADDITION W/ LOFT Plan Check#: Job Address: Permit Type: Parcel No: - Valuation: Occupancy Group # Dwelling Units: Bedrooms: Project Title: Applicant: STEVEN WEBER Owner: 231-2 KIMBERLY CARLSBAD CA 7930 LA CUPELA PL CARLSBAD C& 760-753-8486 - / 0 B 1315 06/28/99 0001 01 02 C—PfMT 61947 Total Fees: $966.09 / Py.yfnentsr 11 p: $-346.92 °,,iBaIce Due: $619.17 / 87 -'-... RecL-Water Con Building Permit Plan Check $355 iV1 dthecrWater Con. Fee $0.00 Fee $0.00 Add'I Building Permit Fee I $0.00N Meter" Se $0.00 Plan Check Discount 0.0 FF Add'l Plan Check Fee \0I04\ FD $0.00 $0.00 Strong Motion Fee . 8257 \ Ul(FD'Fund) $0.00 Park in Lieu Fee $060 6icense Tax Park Fee , $0QO INCoRrLCêff% lsn Tax(CFf5und) $0.00 LFM Fee Bridge Fee $0.00 <0 Trafficlrnct.(ClD Fund) $0.00 Other Bridge Fee 1$ (0 KWMBING R1 1rsbri'ation'ee $0.00 BTD #2 Fee . 1OTA( $0.00 ELECTRICAIr'T OTAL $22.50 BTD #3 Fee Renewal Fee $0 00 TOTAL $33.00 Add'I Renewal Fee $0.00 Housing Impact Fee $0.00 Other Building Fee $0.00 Housing InLieu Fee $0.00 Pot. Water Con. Fee $0.00 Master Drainage Fee: $0.00 Meter Size Sewer Fee: $0.00 AddI Pot. Water Con. Fee $0.00 TOTAL PERMIT FEES $966.09 FINAL APPROVAL ~~W/w Date: ./9 Clearance: NOTICE: Please táké NOTICE that appval of your project includes the "Imposition" of tees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as fees/exactions. You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capactiy changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project NOR DOES IT APPLY to any lees/exactions of which you have oreviouslv been aiven a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has oreviouslv otherwise exoired. CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (760) 438-1161 PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 2075 Las -Palmas Dr., Carlsbad CA '92009 - (760)438-1161 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY PLAN CHECK N,o.c o4s EST.VAL. Plan Ck. Deposit ,,2_ Validated By Date Address (include Bldg/Suite #) Business Name (at this address) . L al Description .. Lot No. Subdivision Name/Number - . Unit No. Ph' No. Total # of units I- Assessor's Parce# Exist in Use posed./W 0001 01 02 1oVJ 4i + Z Z- - C-PRM1' 34692 Description of Work , SQ. FT #ofi , 1' , # of Bedrooms # of Bathrooms VIE N04Z TACT PERSON (if jF 1 t---% Name . Address . City State/Zip Telephone 1 Fa) C# Name fu r Address 2312 Kiber\y1". citycAr15bo State/Zip 92phone #7 .10 -?g5 WOPERTY.OWNER_ DA.)AmArtJer 23%. kirectyC.T. ArkbAD CA 9.200- '7607O-19S Name Address City State/Zip Telephone # L5EcQNTIOW. CO1JY'NAME (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve; demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requiues the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law [Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or that he is exempt therefrom, andthe basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars ($5001). Name , Address City State/Zip . Telephone # State License # ' ' License Class " City Business License # - 'Designer Name Address , ' , City State/Zip Telephone State License# " . Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury orie of the following declarations: I have and will maintain a certificate of Consent toself-iniê fórworkers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. 0- I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Insurance Company ' Policy No. Expiration Date__________________ (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR. ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS [$1001 OR LESS) 0 CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit-is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers'Compensati6n Laws of California. WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminalpenalties 'and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), in addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees. SIGNATURE - DATE I '5"""".-- "NERrBUlLDERrDECLARATION .. - I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: . . . . 0 I, 'is owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work arid the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an Owner of 'property hobuilds or imp'roves thereon, and who 'does - such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold withinone year,of completion, the owner,builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the' project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The CoKtractor's License Law does not apply t0 an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts foi such projets with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). I am exempt under Section' Business and Professions Code for this reason: 1. I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement., 0 YES ONO 2: I (have I havenbt) signed an application for 'a building permit for the proposed work. 3. I have contracted with the following person (firm) to,prpvide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number /,contractors license number): 4 I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (inclUde name I address I phone number / contractors license number): .. - . . 5. I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type of work): PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE B ,nwux~ . DATE /i /99 . TTTTT' ii IT TT I 'Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention ,program under. Sections.25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? 0 YES 0 NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? 0 YES 0 NO Is the facility to be c'onsfructed within 1,000 feet-of the outer boundary of a school Site? 0 YES -0 NO - IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT-BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCYSERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. - -. ONSTRUCTION_LENDING AGECY I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec 3097(i) Civil Code) LENbER'S1 NAME -'- ' LENDER'S ADDRESS I certify that _I ,have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans isaccurate. I agree to comply with all City, ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the Cit' of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE- CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA'permit is required for excavations over 5'O" deep and demolijion or cânStruction of structures over 3-stories in height. - EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the Building'Official under the provisions, of this Code shall expire by. limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by Such permit is not commenced within 365 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after-the work is commenced for a period of 180 days (Section- 106.4.4 Uniform, Building Code).. APPLICANT'S SIGNA'tUREE,.%4.13. DATE - . - .• . , - WHITE: File YELLOW: Applicant PlNK:-Finance — OWN, City of Carlsbad Inspection Request Fo: 11/23/99 Permit# CB990456 Inspector Assignment: PY Title: MARVER ADDITION Description: 842SF ROOM ADDITION W/ LOFT Type: RESDNTL Sub Type: RAID Phone: 7607296532 Job Address: 2312 KIMBERLY CT Suite: Lot 0 Inspector: Location: APPLICANT STEVEN WEBER Owner: MARVER DANA B Remarks: Total Time: Requested By: MARTY Entered By: BARBARA CD Description 19 Final Structural 29 Final Plumbing 39 Final Electrical 49 Final Mechanical Act omments Associated PCRs Inspection History Date Description Act lnsp Comments 10/20/99 23 Gas/Test/Repairs AP PY (POOL PERMIT ALSO OK) 10/13/99 34 Rough Electric AP PY SERVICE UPGRADE METER RELEASE 9/21/99 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding AP PY 9/21/99 17 Interior Lath/Drywall AP PY 9/21/99 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall AP PY 9/20/99 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding CA PY 9/20/99 17 Interior Lath/Drywall CA PY 9/20/99 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall CA PY 9/15/99 16 Insulation AP PD 9/13/99 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding AP PY 9/13/99 23 Gas/Test/Repairs AP PY 9/13/99 34 Rough Electric AP PY 9/13/99 44 Rough/Ducts/Dampers AP PY 9/7/99 13 Shear Panels/HD's AP PY 8/10/99 15Roof/Reroof AP PY I City of Carlsbad Inspection Request For: 10/20/99 Permit# CB990456 Inspector Assignment: PY Title: MARVER ADDITION Description: 842SF ROOM ADDITION W/ LOFT Type: RESDNTL Sub Type: RAD Phone: 7607209856 - Job Address: 2312 KIMBERLY CT Suite: Lot 0 Location: Inspector: APPLICANT STEVEN WEBER Owner: MARVER DANA B Remarks: Total Time: Requested By: DANA Entered By: CHRISTINE CD Description Act Comments( 23 Gas/Test/Repairs Inspection History Date Description Act lnsp comments 10/13/99 34 Rough Electric AP PY SERVICE UPGRADE METER RELEASE 9/21/99 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding AP PY 9/21/99 17 Interior Lath/Drywall AP PY 9/21/99 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall AP PY 9/20/99 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding CA PY 9/20/99 17 Interior Lath/Drywall CA PY 9/20/99 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall CA PY 9/15/99 16 Insulation AP PD 9/13/99 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding AP PY 9/13/99 23 Gas/Test/Repairs AP PY 9/13/99 34 Rough Electric AP PY 9/13/99 44 Rough/Ducts/Dampers AP PY 9/7/99 13 Shear Panels/HD's AP PY 8/10/99 15 Roof/Reroof AP PY 7/14/99 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers AP PY 23 /<IL—T 'A'%% \, ># GEOCON 4 INCORPORATED GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS 6960 FLANDERS DRIVE • SAN DIEGO CALIFORNIA 92121-2974 • TEL (619). 558-6900 I FAX (619) 558-6159 V FOUNDATION OBSERVATION REPORT PROJECT NAME: —m ar ver Resirl(ence AId; /,a,, PROJECT NO. 01646 -31-01 LOCATION: Ft,+e oct+a, o Rec4r DATE: FOUNDATION LOCATION (if not entire buildinq) PLAN FILE NO. PERMIT NOS: B 91O95(Q FOUNDATION TYPE: CONVENTIONAL 0 POST-TENSIONED 0 ADDITIONAL OBSERVATION REQUIRED SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE PURPOSE OF.OBSERVATION gVerify soil conditions exposed are similar to those anticipated $ Verify footing excavations extend to minimum depth recommended in soil report Verify foundation reinforcement complies with minimum recommended in soil report El Verify slab reinforcement, sand bedding and moisture barrier comply with minimum recommended in soil report 0 Verify footings have been extended to an appropriate bearing strata El Other APPLICABLE SOIL REPORT: TITLE: !'e.A ('rc' 1eJrn/ct,1 jrç/ Ec;J Molver Qe4c AJJ"°, ;4eti1 c4 Cc?.'Isb4d, (1 DATE: __________ SOIL REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS BASED ON: 0 Expansion Condition 0 VERY LOW LOW El MEDIUM El HIGH El VERY HIGH Fill Geometry ped -I4 it ±Ep of dope. El Other: MINIMUM FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS: ' 6 i J Q f 4, Footing Depth: El 12 Inches El 18 Inches 0 24 Inches OTHER Footing Reinforcement: 0 No.4T&B 2-No.4T&B El 2-No.5T&B El Post-Tensioned OTHER: Interior Slab Reinforcement: 0 6x6-10/10 El 6x6-616 j4'No.3@241nche5 El No.3@181nches El Post-Tensioned Slab Bedding Material and Thickness : Vapor Barrier: Foundation Width : fiA& OBSERVATIONS: Substantial conformance with Soil Reports (see "Purpose of Observation") El Substantial conformance with Foundation Plans. Identify: El Other COMMENTS: t GEOCON INCORPORATED COMPACTION TEST SUMMARY A I II CO/yb, 3 0 PROJECT NAME I Vt2er <es (or goo, e f-IoI t f- 7,,h PROJECT NO. ___ CORRESPONDING FIELD REPORT NO. Al/A TEST NO. TEST DATE LOCATION ELEV. (FEET) RELATIVE COMP. (%( REMARKS /d:#;,, Pd- i'i' QJ.. 9~ - • d; 1; P&4 5E ovad, COMMENTS y rpe. £.'our ei i.Arer fi.i1/E n co,acc 54\ID tvtfl- A ThE OF /1AI/fls'fl' 0/2)' Dri.S,r/ 1.0pef aPn4ium m s 72'ZE 7r!74, SID ................... Storm Drain SM. Lateral WM WL ................ .:: Lateral iT .................... Joint Trench SG ........... ........Subgrade B ...................... Base SW.................Sidewalk . WB ................. BackFill AC..................Asphaltic Concrete DISTRIBUTION Kcfk)a, . YES NO , GEOCON REPRESENTATIVE 44 1 GI4A e- E. EY'i B? a SUPERINTEDENT I€tIEN Pam 1.= JOB TRAILER -_OTHER - mo. / date / year 6960 FLANDERS DRIVE • SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92121-2974 • PHONE (619) 558-6900 • FAX (619) 558-6159 SHEET ____ OF ____ GEOCON :- 74 1TE'T 1tiW1itC INCORPORATED IJiJJiIflJVJ.Li1VL.fl MEMO NO. PROJECT NAME M€,rer 12e5ide,7ce AdeZ/i',n CORRESPONDING PROJECT NO. %•/'O/ FIELD REPORT NO. "IA _- ( : •-UBJECT:AdI;o, PoJ Pp€c-/;oi ,1d ,crnJa4(l &X va/o, bbs9,vd, lit ;s memp h a c beep jQne,gg ,,1d *'i5a /; siCv Cl , I C0' /.c 6) Iiid0 doa,fi)ie,'/ 1he S..-e-1 5)?'e. TA' ;r S;I/ed 11 ;/aJ 6eeCib1Ie/ e./Jn /2e.c;de,'ce AJdd//Ofl) (c'r/ Car/dad, C/.4ir,,/4, p flarei/ by eoc da4 Ap;1 I, ic'. 7Ae bid;,,, add)ii pal 0ee1p*te1/ ia,, çjLp/ lou -CIp,4,,ce b#:# te prOJ / o;/ r o 1 óiç'n ha osepvd ik ,)a/ /)ai-c. ftrn ds;,,ec4L'aon~ '"d 44"i ib be- . ;a, çti,/ iorr1a4(e -lie eudQ/;.a/1c f 4t r-e14,4eeI p'i (see aceoipcy iAy Faød1;c Obce q'ftj, 12rpo1). TP3j/e i'øc/5i h-c -ft per 6,r..S c4I 'h(e s4e, ,nd:r4/e /k rod LA'4 C' 41 ôc 9ox S 7'4 /-S';5 4cd (see "4,' 60mo2 odiyn1 - 't " t " •c p f'ae CCi, d *4e e &A ple.0; PO. c. DISTRIBUTION: YES NO 6/ Superintendent (lien$-4%is Foreman (Contractor) - Geocon Representative e. Job Trailer - Other Date T 108 (7/93) 6960 FLANDERS DRIVE SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92121-2974 PHONE (619) 558-6900 FAX (619) 558-6159 * '1. VARIM 70 PJLi TNt 1411SI0N WML CDVKNM MU INI LX1LJ* OF OINSS $U U PLAIM. SI IW" AUVlE AS 10 ___ u flLMWTWAffs ,wc c O Mi. "siP SMALLVE MO " 21 MAXIM 31 ALL PAN.LAM KAM NALL K - ON i* cisi COW 0 i.uwu I 23 PASSAU ____ p W0 L133 I. EAcK-' a OTIh& UWOSWlION O p.) SPAN ON THE rACC OF lilt (p if MANWAP TISIPIS THE TUM OF lit Tmisso \ -.- .---- -- -. -'---. SOIL NOTES - t AM lilt FOOThl$ AM 9XCAVAM SIR PSIOS TO UQUCSUN A !LSI L FS*IflON ow LliOl Tht SOL OSSP L WVW*= ThE WE MS NVW 10 lIE MALMO Dfrft& IN w At INC PJLSIHS PAD WAS P00%= SI *1W ThE s. &— / SLPE.. SI SM OUMM IIØU. UVIW THE POIMMTION MMII MS lit 4 ThE UTILITY i*oa IViVI IIUS PPOPUY &&= VU — ,u1A \\ AND OOMPACM /D lilt FOUNDIARM £CQWAUOS FM W= AND SMALL COMNX *1W liE 10111 NMI MS APID ;,//,It sms D"m WALK Pwaij meI1IM OF VDOI$IG CAVA1ION, OI?1H OF P001115, 105.1 CONDI1I0S M AT rem um •1 IVf ___ ___ 4X421 Speol UAW Ft CoMfRw= lINt COWLY *1W ML *COW1kS4 SI ThE FOR AL Ot WE MS s. W= SM4L COURY *m THE - VMOME 1 SI INC 10S. 1. Hz ALL SOIL COACW ISINi. K SM MPL SOIL. CIIIPW NO= TO camFT ThE OOUOIS !MÜC T 2. UL Way / P-Rcr 10,All ALLOWASI1L SOS. SCIS P1SIJU.' 207 c*avt PAVUIG UPnC ik A) USWT '*A1 1RAPt r OF A1PS&LT ON V OF T MU COARK ON V OF NAM UNNUR I) IE&W TWflC— 5' ON C-101 C119 *1W Of. is N I.W. ON $ CF CUSS; I MU lESI$N IV - // • E —. / M —NOTES 1. ML K 10 Comm *1W OJFAW cMaC. . i. EsGil Corporation In Partnership with government for rBui&Iing Safety DATE: 05/04/99 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 99-456 SET: II PROJECT ADDRESS: 2312 Kimberly Ct. PROJECT NAME: Addition for Marver Residence DAP. NT JuRis: REVIEWER U FILE The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply. with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. LII The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed fOr the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the, plancheck has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: . Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: ) . Fax . Mail Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS: 1) Need to note on ciy..set6?ipage2 that missing shear designator on floor framing at back of small room i ear. 2) Need an outlet on page 1 at far left corner of 1st floor plan. By: Ray Fuller Enclosures: Esgil Corporation LI GA LI MB J) EJ fl PC 04/27/99 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (619) 560-1468 • Fax(619)560-1576 4 EsGil Corporation In Partnership with government for uifihing Safety DATE: 02/12/99 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 99-456 PROJECT ADDRESS: 2312 Kimberly Ct. SET:! U AP ICANT JURIS U PLAN REVIEWER U FILE PROJECT NAME: Addition for Marver Residence F] The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. fl The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Steven Weber 7930 La Capela P1. Carlsbad, Ca. 92009 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise-the applicant (except by mail) that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person L REMARKS: By: Ray Fuller Enclosures: Esgil Corporation 0 GA 0 MB 0 EJ LI PC 02/04/99 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (619) 560-1468 • Fax (619) 560-1576 Carlsbad 99-456 02/12/99 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES PLAN CHECK NO.: 99-456 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 2312 Kimberly Ct. FLOOR AREA: Dwelling 842 STORIES: 2 HEIGHT: 21 REMARKS DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: 02/01/99 DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED: 02/12/99 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 02/04/99 PLAN REVIEWER: Ray Fuller This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contain,ed in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinance, by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Present California law mandates that residential construction comply with Title 24 and the following model codes: 1994 UBC (effective 12/28/95), 1994 UPC (effective 12/28/95), 1994 UMC (effective 2/23/96) and 1993 NEC (effective 12/28/95). The above regulations apply to residential construction, regardless of the code editions -adopted by ordinance. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec., 106.4.3, 1994 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when. you submit the 'revised plans. LIST NO. 1, GENERAL SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES WITHOUT SUPPLEMENTS (1994 UBC) r3forw.dot rib Carlsbad 99-456 02/12/99 PLANS Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: I Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92009, (760) 438-1161. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (619) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. Plans, specifications and calculations shall be signed and sealed by the California state licensed engineer or architect responsible for' their preparation, for plans deviating from conventional wood frame construction. Specify expiration date of license. (California Business and Professions Code). On the cover sheet of the plans, specify any items requiring special inspection, in a format similar to that shown below. Section 106.3.2. . REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS In addition to the regular inspections, the following checked items will also require Special Inspection in accordance with Sec. 1701 of the Uniform Building Code. ITEM ' REQUIRED? REMARKS EXPANSION/EPDXY ANCHORS Depending on structural calculations When special inspection is required, the architect or engineer of record shall prepare an inspection program which shall be submitted to the building official for approval prior to issuance of the building permit. Please review Section 106.3.5. Please complete the attached form. On the cover sheet of the plans, specify any items that will have a deferred submittal (Spiral Staircase). Additionally, provide the following note on the plans, per Sec. 106.3.4.2: "Submittal documents for deferred submittal items shall be submitted to the architect or engineer of record, who shall review them and forward them to the building official with a notation indicating that the deferred submittal documents have been reviewed and that they have been found to be in general conformance with the design of the building. The deferred submittal items shall NOT be installed until their design and submittal documents have been approved by the building official." Carlsbad 99-456 02/12/99 . GENERAL RESIDENTIAL REQUIREMENTS 6. Glazing in the following locations should be of safety glazing material in accordance with Section 2406.4, (see exceptions): a) Fixed or operable panels adjacent to a door where the nearest exposed edge of the glazing is within a 24-inch arc of either vertical edge of the door in a closed position and where the bottom exposed edge of the glazing is less than 60 inches above the walking surface. Page 2.window 2 next to slider in family room. EXITS, STAIRWAYS, AND RAILINGS 7. Provide spiral stairway details, per Section 1006.6: Minimum run is 7-1/2 inches measured at a point 12 inches from where the treads are the narrowest. Maximum rise is 9-1/2 inches. Maximum-clear opening between risers is 4 inches. Minimum headroom is 6 feet 6 inches. The tread must provide a clear walking area measuring at least 26 inches from the outer edge of the supporting column to the inner edge of the handrail. 8. Provide I.C.B.O. Research Report and number for metal stairway, or submit plans and calculations and approved fabricator registered with the building department or note that the stairway fabrication plans shall be submitted to and approved by the building official prior to installation (deferred). . ROOFING 9. Specify on the plans the following information for the roof materials, per Section 106.3.3: . Manufacturer's name. Product name/number. ICBO approval number, or equal. 10. Show attic ventilation. Minimum vent area is 1/150 of attic area (or 1/300 of attic area if at 'east 50% of the required vent is at least 3 feet above eave vents or cornice vents). Provide calculations to show area required and area provided. Section 1505.3. . FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS 11. Provide a copy of the project soil report prepared by a California licensed architect or civil engineer. The report shall include foundation design recommendations based on the engineer's findings and shall comply with UBC Section 1804. City of Carlsbad requirements. (If over 3 years old it will require a update letter.) Carlsbad 99-456 02/12/99 12. Investigate the potential for seismically induced soil liquefaction and soil instability in seismic zones 3 and 4. Section 1804.5 13. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading 'plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the 'soils report are properly incorporated into the construction documents (when required by the soil report). 14. Per soils report, note on the plan the soils classification, whether or not the soil is expansive and note the allowable bearing value. Section 1804.3. 15. . Note on plans that surface water will drain away from building, and show drainage pattern . Section 1804.7. 16. Show foundation bolt size and spacing. Foundation bolt size and spacing for shear walls must be clearly shown on the foundation plan. Section 1806.6. 17. .If required, show size, embedment and location of hold down anchors on foundation plan: Section -106.3.3. Detail retro fit hold downs if required and include lCBO/NER #. FRAMING 18. Plywood shown on Section A page 2 needs to be Pressure treated also at raised platform. 19. Detail all post-to-beam and post-to-footing connections and reference the detail to the plan. Section 2324. Page 2 floor framing plan missing beam to beam connections. 20. Per .UBC Section 2343:6, provide the following note on the plans if trusses are used: "Each truss shall be legibly branded, marked or otherwise have permanently affixed thereto the following information located within 2 feet of the center of the span on the face of the bottom chord: Identity of the company manufacturing the truss. The design load. The spacing of the trusses." 21. Provide calculations for main vertical and horizontal framing members and footings. Section 106.3.3. Include in calculations point loads to existing footings. 22. Provide calculations for lateral loads, shear panels, shear transfer and related. Section 106.3.3. Include in calculations how the removal of existing stucco/ walls is compensated for. 23. Reference bubbles are not completed on elevations. 24. No details provided for wood trellis. u 01, Carlsbad 99-456 02/12/99 Show location of attic access with a minimum size of 22"x30", unless the maximum vertical headroom height in the attic is less than 30". Access must be provided to each separated attic area, shall be located in a hallway or other readily accessible location and 30" headroom clearance is required above the opening. Section 1505.1. . ELECTRICAL (NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE) Missing receptacles along back wall of family room on page 1. To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e;, plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. . Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: Yes U No U The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 619/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Ray Fuller at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. Carlsbad 99-456 02/12/99 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE Revised 02/17/99 RSF JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 99-456 PREPARED BY: Ray Fuller DATE: 02/12/99 BUILDING ADDRESS: 2312 Kimberly Ct. BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R3 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN BUILDING PORTION i 1 BUILDING AREA (ft.) VALUATION MULTIPLIER VALUE ($) Dwelling 842 98.00 82,516.00 Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE 82,516.00 IJ 199 UBC Building Permit Fee Z Bldg. Permit Fee by ordinance:$ 426.07 $546.70 199 UBC Plan Check Fee Z Plan Check Fee by ordinance: $ 277.53 $355.36 Type of Review: Z Complete Review Structural Only fl Hourly fl Repetitive Fee Applicable D Other: Esgil Plan Review Fee: 222.03 284.28 Comments Sheet 1 o I macvalue.doc 5196 of Carlsbad 4I/ F BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST DATE: 1 14b5l PLANCHECK NO.:. CB BUILDING ADDRESS: 23\2.- 1<tMI3ERLy cr PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PslTTh,J J2 0 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: I6•'7 531 33 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT EST. VALUE: 7 2 /70 APPROVAL DENIAL The item you have submitted for review has been Please see the attached report of deficiencies approved. The approval is based on plans, marked with 0. Make necessary corrections to plans information and/or specifications provided in your or specifications for compliance with applicable submittal; therefore any changes to these items after codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or this date, including field modifications, must be specifications to this office for review. reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to build. By: EI Right-of-Way permit is required prior to construction of the following improvements: By: By: EERING By: AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE BUILDING PE __V Date: Date: Date: Date: FOR 0 FICIAL USE ONLY MIT 4 :f 1 / -9 - ATTACHMENTS Li Dedication Application Li Dedication Checklist Li Improvement Application Li Improvement Checklist LI Future Improvement Agreement Li Grading Permit Application Li Grading Submittal Checklist LI Right-of-Way Permit Application ENGINEERING DEPT. CONTACT PERSON Name: KATWI F=F=Kl M PAPRAPP City of Carlsbad Address: 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 Phone: (619) 438-1161, ext. 4374 CFD INFORMATION Parcel Map No: Lots: Recordation: Li Right-of-Way Permit Submittal Checklist Carlsbad Tract: and Information Sheet Li Sewer Fee Information Sheet A-4 576 • (760) 438-1161 • FAX (760) 431-5769 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST SITE PLAN 2NDJ 3RDJ IJ 1. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: rth Arrow perty Lines BEisting & Proposed Structures E Easements C. Existing Street Improvements F---Right-of-Way .Width' & Adjacent Streets /C3 9-Driveway widths U U 2. Show on site plan: c6nage Patterns Building pad surface drainage must maintain a minimum slope of one percent towards an adjoining street or an approved drainage course. ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE: "Finish grade will provide a minimum positive —&ainage of 2% to swale 5' away from building." Existing & Proposed Slopes and Topography U 3. Include on title sheet: Siteaddress, Assessor's Parcel Number Legal Description For commercial/industrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, include: total building square footage with the square footage for each different use, existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing, warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved. EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION • DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE U U 4a. Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of approval for ProjectNo.________________________________________________ U U U 4b. All conditions are in compliance. Date: \ASPALMAS\SYS\LIBRARVENG\WORD\DOC$\CHXLST8uilding PIanched Mist BP000I Fonn KF.doc Rev. 9/3/97 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS 1STJ.N.( 3RDI (V I 5. Dedication for all street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the building site and any storm drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and for remodels with a value at or exceeding $_/O O•1Y0 , pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.030. Dedication required as follows: Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8 1/2" x 11" plat map and submit with a title report. All easement documents must be approved and signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process. Submit the completed application form with the required checklist items and fees to the Engineering Department in person. Applications will not be accept by mail or fax. Dedication completed by: . Date: IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the construction exceeds $.O ,Oo , pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.040. Public improvements required as follows: Attached please-find an application form and submittal checklist for the public improvement requirements. A registered Civil Engineer must prepare the appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements on the attached checklist to the Engineering Department through a separate plan check process. The completed application form and the requirements on the checklist must be submitted in person. Applications by mail or fax are not accepted. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of building permit. Improvement Plans signed by: Date: Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title report or current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $_________________ so we may prepare the necessary Future Improvement Agreement. This agreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building permit. Future public improvements required as follows: \\ASPALMAS\SYS\LIBRARV\ENG\WORDDO$\CHKLS\9jjjrç Plantheck Cidat 8P000I Form KF.dOC Rev. 9I3I7 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST ii' 3rd.' 6c. Enclosed please find your Future Improvement Agreement. Please return agreement signed and notarized to the Engineering Department. Future Improvement Agreement completed by: Date: U U 6d. No Public Improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or defective ( improvements found adiacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction of the City Inspector prior to occupancy. GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section .11.06.030 of the Municipal Code. U U U 7a. Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading requirements. Include accurate grading quantities (cut, fill import, export). U U 7b. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer must be submitted together with the completed application form attached. NOTE: The Grading Permit must be issued and rough grading approval obtained prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Grading Inspector sign off by: Date: U U U 7c. Graded Pad Certification required. (Note: Pad certification may be required even if a grading permit is not required.) U U U 7d. No Grading Permit required. U U U 7e. If grading is notrequired, write "No Grading" On plot plan. MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS U U 8. A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-Way and/or private work adjacent to the public Right-of-Way. Types of work include, but are not limited to: street improvements, tree trimming, driveway construction, tieing into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities. Right-of-Way, permit required for: Planthed, Cklst BP000I Form KF.dOC Rev. 913197 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1 St/ 2ndl 3rd'/ A SEWER PERMIT is required concurrent with the building permit issuance. The fee is noted in the fees section on the following page. INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT If your facility is located in the City of Carlsbad sewer service area, you need to contact the Carlsbad Municipal Water District, located at 5950 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008. District personnel can provide forms and assistance, and will check to see if your business enterprise is on the EWA Exempt List. You may telephone (760) 438-2722, extension 153, for assistance. Industrial Waste permit accepted by: Date: 11. NPDES PERMIT Complies with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant shall provide best management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever occurs first. r 0 Required fees are attached E1 No fees required Additional Comments: PLincheck Cklst BP000I Form KF.dOC Rev. 9/3/97 , PLANNING DEPARTMENT BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST Plan.Check No. CB qci 056 Address PS11 Vrberl( (-h Planner Paul Godwin Phone (619) 438-1161, extension 4329 C) APN: lC7512 • Type of Project & Use: 5F1& Fc14o,., Net Project Density: DU/AC ° Zoning:P.to1000_GeneraI Plan: RLM Facilities Management Zone: I CFD fin/nut) #Date of participation: Remaining net dev acres:______ c~ Circle One Cn (For non-residential development: Type of land used created b'\ this permit:__________________________________________________ : : : Legend: Item Complete Item Incomplete - Needs your action E EvIronmental Review Requi'ré YES NO TYPE DATE OF COMPLETION: -. Compliance with conditions of aprovaI? if not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: :iz: LI Discretionary Action Required: YES N0 TYPE APPROVAL/RESO. NO. DATE - PROJECT NO. OTHER RELATED CASES: Compliance with conditions or approval? if not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval:. - Coafal, Zone Assessment/Compliance ft Project site located in Coastal Zone? YES NO____ CA Coastal Commission Authority?' YES____ NO If' Clifdrnia Coastal Commissicn Atithrity: Contact them at - 31 11 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 200, San Diego CA 92108-1725; (619) 5218036 Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt): Coastal Permit Determination Form already completed? YES NO If NO, complete Coastal. Permit Determination Form now. - Coastal Permit Determination Log #: Follow-Up Actions: - 1) Stamp Building Plans as "Exempt" or "Coastal Permit Required" (at minimum Floor Plans). ,"2) Complete Coastal Permit Determination Log as needed. Inclusionary Housing Fee required: YES NO X.,. (Effective date of Inclusionary Housing Ordinance - May 21, 1993.) Data Entry Completed? YES NO (A/P/Ds, Activity Maintetiance, enter CB#, toolbar, Screens, Housing FeeConstruct Housing YIN, Enter Fee, UPDATE!) - Site Plan: Provide a fully dimensional site plan ,drawn to scale. Show: North arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed. struçtüres, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way width, dim 'ensional setbacks and existing, topographical lines. Provide legal description of property nd assessor's parcel number. Zoning: U U Setbacks: Front: ', Required O Shown Interior Side: " Required Shown Street Side: Required - Shown Rear: Required 1 6 1 Shown / Accessory structure setbacks: Fron . Required Shown Interior Side: uired Shown Street Side Require Shown Required Structure separation: Required Shown F1 F-1 Lot Coverage: Required LtoO/ Shown Height: Required ~ 2O? Shown a3 -6 Parking: Spaces Required ccAr ~ar Shown car r Guest Spaces Required Shown Additional Comments_________________________________________________________ OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER QQuj-1AL1."DATE - LIMITED GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION MARVER RESIDENCE ADDITION 2312 KIMBERLY COURT CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA PREPARED FOR DANA AND ROSALIND MARVER CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 1999 APRIL qqo1c GEOCON INCORPORATED GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS Project No. 06286-31-01 April 16, 1999 Dana and Rosalind Marver 2312 Kimberly Court Carlsbad, California 92008 Subject: MARVER RESIDENCE ADDITION 2312 KIMBERLY COURT CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA LIMITED GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Dear Mr. and Mrs. Marver: In accordance with our proposal LG-99121, dated March 16, 1999, and your authorization we herein submit our geotechnical report for the subject project. The scope of services included a limited geotechnical investigation and review of previous geotechnical reports for the site. The report I presents our findings, conclusions, and recommendations regarding the geotechnical aspects of constructing the building addition as proposed. In our opinion, the addition may be constructed as proposed provided the recommendations of this report are followed. If you have any questions regarding this report or if we may be of further service please contact the undersigned at your convenience. I Very truly yours. GEOCON INCORPORATED I. I David B. Evans CEG 1860 MEE:DBE:bas (2) Addressee (4) Mr. Steven D. Weber, Architect I 6960 Flanders Drive U San Diego, California 92121-2974 • Telephone (619) 558-6900 U Fax (619) 558-6159 I I I I I I I I I I I I Michael E. Embick GE 2462 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE .1 SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION............................................................................................... SOIL AND GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS ............................................................................................2 GEOLOGIC HAZARDS .....................................................................................................................2 4.1. Faulting and Seismicity .........................................................................................................2 4.2. Liquefaction ............................................................................................................................ 3 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS...............................................................................4 5.1. General ..................... .............................................................................................................. 4 5.2. Grading..................................................................................................................................4 5.3. Foundations............................................................................................................................5 5.4. Swimming Pool .....................................................................................................................6 5.5. Concrete Floor Slab...............................................................................................................6 5.6. Drainage.................................................................................................................................7 LIMITATIONS AND UNIFORMITY OF CONDITIONS FIGURES AND ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1, Vicinity Map Figure 2, Site Plan APPENDIX A FIELD INVESTIGATION Figures A-1—A-2, Logs of Trenches APPENDIX B LABORATORY TESTING Table B-I, Summary of Laboratory Direct Shear Test Results Table B-TI, Summary of Laboratory Expansion Index Test Results APPENDIX C RECOMMENDED GRADING SPECIFICATIONS LIMITED GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION 1. PURPOSE AND SCOPE This report presents the results of a limited geotechnical investigation for a proposed 800-square-foot building addition to the rear of an existing single family residential structures located at 2312 Kimberly Court in Carlsbad, California. A swimming pool is proposed in the backyard, as well. A site vicinity map is provided on Figure 1. The purpose of this study was to investigate the soil and geologic conditions in the vicinity of the building addition, and provide geotechnical engineering information for use in design and construction. To aid in performing this investigation the following report was reviewed: Final Report of Testing and Observation. Services during Mass Grading Operations for Rising Glen, Carlsbad, California, prepared by Geocon Incorporated, dated February 20, 1987 (Project No. D-2981-M05). The referenced report encompasses the mass grading operations for the subject lot and surrounding subdivision. The field investigation was performed on March 25, 1999, and consisted of a soil reconnaissance of the addition area and the excavation of two, hand-dug trenches within the boundary of the proposed addition. A site plan showing the approximate location of the addition and exploratory trenches is provided as Figure 2. Laboratory tests were performed on selected samples obtained from various depths within the trenches to evaluate pertinent physical properties. Details of the field investigation and the laboratory test results are provided in Appendix A and B, respectively. The recommendations presented in this report are based on an analysis of the data collected during the site investigation, a review of the referenced report, the results of laboratory tests performed on soil samples collected during the site investigation, and our experience with similar soil and geologic I conditions. 2. SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION The following descriptions represent our understanding of the proposed development and are based on conversations with Mr. Steven D. Weber, project architect, and our site reconnaissance. Geocon Incorporated should be notified if the project plans differ from those discussed below. Once final plans are available, Geocon Incorporated should review the final design. The two-story addition is proposed on the northeast side of the existing building, to be located in the northeast corner of the backyard. A pool is proposed in the western half of the backyard. It is understood that the residence was constructed roughly 11 to 12 years ago on Lot 68 of the Rising Glen development. Based on a review of the referenced report, the lot was graded in 1986. The Project No. 06286-31-01 . I - April 16, 1999 Li] I F11 I I I I Li I I Li I I I I F,] 'I I I property consists of fill soil ranging in thickness from 8 feet to 30 feet. A north-facing fill slope is present along the back (north) end of the lot and ranges in height from approximately 50 to 60 feet. I Due to the height of the fill slope, and the relatively close proximity of the addition to the top of the slope, deepened foundations are recommended for the building addition as discussed in Conclusions and Recommendations. I 3. SOIL AND GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS I Based on a review of the referenced geotechnical report, and the field investigation, the building pad is underlain by compacted fill soil consisting of sandy clay and silty to clayey, fine- to medium- grained sand. The fill soil is underlain by dense sandstone of the Santiago Formation. Due to its generally loose condition, the upper approximately one foot of the fill soil beneath the grass will I require remedial grading as discussed in the Conclusions and Recommendations portion of this report. The soil was identified in the referenced report as having a low expansion potential as defined by the Uniform Building Code (UBC) Table 18-I-b. Laboratory testing of soil obtained within the I trenches confirmed the low expansion potential. I Logs of the trenches describing the soil units encountered are presented in Appendix A, Figures Al and A2. 4. GEOLOGIC HAZARDS 1 4.1. Faulting and Seismicity A review of geologic literature and our experience with the soil and geologic conditions in the I general area indicate that no active faults are located within the property boundaries. The nearest known active fault is the offshore portion of the Newport-Inglewood Fault, located approximately 6 I miles west of the subject site. The Newport-Inglewood Fault is capable of generating the largest maximum credible site acceleration. Estimated Maximum Credible and Maximum Probable peak site accelerations are 0.31g and 0.18g, respectively. Seismic parameters for selected regional faults which I are capable of generating ground acceleration at the site are summarized in Table-4.1 on the following page. 1 I I Project No. 06286-31-01 0 -2- April 16, 1999 TABLE 4.1 DETERMINISTIC SITE PARAMETERS FOR SELECTED FAULTS Fault Name Distance From Site (miles) Maximum Credible Event Maximum Probable Event Maximum Credible (Mag) Peak Site Acceleration (g) Maximum Probable (Mag) Peak Site Acceleration (g) Newport-Inglewood (Offshore) 6 6.9 .31 5.8 .18 Rose Canyon 6 6.9 .31 5.7 .17 Coronado Banks 22 7.4 .12 6.3 .07 Elsinore-Julian 23 7.1 .10 6.4 .07 Elsinore-Temecula 23 6.8 .09 6.3 .07 ~A 4.2. Liquefaction In view of the dense/compacted nature of the fill soil underlying the site and the lack of near-surface groundwater, liquefaction does not present a significant geologic hazard to the proposed project. Project No. 06286-31-01 -3- April 16, 1999 L I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 5. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS I 5.1. General 5.1.1. It is the opinion of Geocon Incorporated that no soil or geologic conditions exist at the site I that would preclude the construction of the building addition as presently planned, provided that the recommendations of this report are followed. 1 5.1.2. The subject site is underlain by compacted fill soil and sandstone of the Santiago Formation. The fill was placed and compacted in late 1986 and early 1987 and was I observed during placement by Geocon Incorporated as discussed in the previously referenced geotechnical report. The upper approximately one foot of fill has been disturbed by landscaping and irrigation; therefore, recommendations follow for I recompacting the upper one foot of fill. I 5.2. Grading 5.2.1. Grading at the site should be in accordance with the Recommended Grading Specifications provided in Appendix C and the City of Carlsbad Grading Ordinance. Where the recommendations of Appendix C conflict with this section of the report, the I recommendations of this section shall take precedence. I 5.2.2. Site preparation should begin with the removal of all deleterious material and vegetation. (including grass, tree stumps and roots) within the area of proposed improvement. The removed material should be properly disposed of and should not be used as fill material at I the site. The depth of removal should be such that material exposed is relatively free of organic matter. 5.2.3. After removal of unsuitable materials as described above, the upper approximately one foot should be processed and recompacted to at least 90 percent of maximum dry density at I approximately 2 percent over optimum moisture content, as determined in accordance with ASTM Test Procedure D1557-91. The processing should be accomplished by thoroughly I scarifying the soil to provide a uniform acceptable moisture content prior to applying compactive effort. In the event that unsuitable soils are observed to extend deeper than approximately one foot, the depth of processing may be increased. The site should then be I brought to final subgrade elevation with structural fill compacted in layers. In general, soils native to the site are suitable for re-use as fill if free from vegetation, debris and other I deleterious material. Layers of fill should be no thicker than will allow for adequate bonding and compaction. Fill materials near and/or below optimum moisture content will I Project No. 06286-31-01 -4- April 16, 1999 Ll I require additional moisture conditioning prior to placing additional fill. Overly wet soil will require drying and/or mixing with drier soils to facilitate proper compaction. I 5.3. Foundations 5.3.1. The footings for the addition should be deepened such that the minimum horizontal distance of the bottom outside edge of the footing to the face of the slope is H13 (where H I equals the vertical distance from the top of the slope to the toe). An acceptable alternative to deepening the footings would be the use of a post-tensioned slab and foundation system or increased footing and slab reinforcement. Specific design parameters or I recommendations for a post tensioned slabs can be provided if desired. The following foundation recommendations account for this increase in depth based on measurements taken during the investigation. 5.3.2. The project is suitable for the use of continuous strip footings and isolated spread footings. I Continuous strip footings should be at least 12 inches wide. Where the footing are located within 12 feet of the top of the slope, they should extend at least 5 feet below the lowest I adjacent soil grade. Where footings are located between 12 and 20 feet from the top of the slope, they should extend at least 3 feet below the lowest adjacent grade. Strip footings located more than 20 feet from the top of the slope should extend at least 2 feet below the I lowest adjacent grade. Isolated spread footings should be at least 24 inches square and extend at least 2 feet below the lowest adjacent grade. I 5.3.3. The minimum reinforcement of continuous strip footing should consist of four No. 4 steel bars placed horizontally in the footings, two near the top and two near the bottom. The I steel reinforcement for the spread footing should be designed by the project structural engineer. The recommended concrete reinforcement presented above is based on soil I characteristics only and is not intended to be in lieu of the reinforcement required for structural loading. I 5.3.4. An allowable bearing pressure of 2000 psf (pounds per square foot) is recommended for foundations designed as discussed above. This value is for dead plus live loads and may be I increased by one-third when considering transient loads due to wind or seismic forces. 5.3.5. The foundations, designed as recommended above, are anticipated to have an estimated I total settlement of 3/4 inch and differential settlement across the addition of 1/2 inch. 5.3.6. All footing excavations should be observed by a representative of Geocon Incorporated I prior to placing reinforcing steel or concrete to witness that the excavations are in compliance with recommendations and the soil conditions are as anticipated. I Project No. 06286-31-01 -5- April 16, 1999 I 1 5.3.7. Lateral loads may be resisted by a passive pressure equivalent to that generated by a fluid weighing 300 pcf. If the ground surface is not covered with concrete or asphalt the upper I 12 inches of the soil profile should not be included in the calculation of the passive pressure. A coefficient of 0.35 may also be used to calculate the resistance to sliding along the concrete/ soil interface. These values are presented as allowable values having I incorporated a factor of safety of 1.5. I 5.3.8. The foundation system for the proposed addition should be structurally connected to the existing building foundation. 1 5.4. Swimming Pool 5.4.1. The following recommendation assumes the swimming pool will be located a minimum of I 10 feet from the top of the slope. It is recommended that the portion of the swimming pool wall within 20 feet of the top of the slope should be designed assuming that the adjacent soil provides no lateral support. I 5.5. Concrete Floor Slab 5.5.1. The interior floor slab should be at least 5 inches thick and be reinforced with No. 3 I reinforcing bars placed 24 inches on center, in both directions. The reinforcing bars should be placed on chairs at the slab mid-point. 1 5.5.2. The slab should be underlain by at least 3 inches of clean sand. I 5.5.3. If the interior floor slab will receive moisture-sensitive floor covering, or will be used to store moisture-sensitive materials, or where migration of moisture through the slab is undesirable, it should be underlain by a suitable vapor barrier placed at the mid-point of the I sand layer recommended above. I 5.5.4. Crack-control joints should be provided within the slab. The spacing of the crack-control joints should be no greater than 12 feet. 1 Presaturation of subgrade soil is not deemed necessary prior to placing concrete; however, soil that is to receive concrete should be sprinkled with water as necessary to maintain a I moist condition as would be expected in any such concrete placement. I 5.5.6. The recommendations of this report are intended to reduce, not prevent, the potential for cracking of concrete slabs. Even with the incorporation of the recommendations of this report, foundations, stucco, and at-grade concrete slabs may still exhibit cracking due to 1 Project No. 06286-31-01 -6- April 16, 1999 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I shrinkage of the concrete during curing. The occurrence of shrinkage cracks is independent of the supporting soil characteristics. The potential for shrinkage cracks may be reduced by limiting the slump of the concrete, proper placement and curing of the concrete, and the construction of crack-control joints. 5.6. Drainage 5.6.1. Adequate drainage provisions are imperative. Under no circumstances should water be allowed to pond adjacent to footings. The building pad should be properly graded to insure that water is directed away from foundations and concrete slabs and into controlled- drainage devices. Project No. 06286-31-01 -7- April 16, 1999 1 I LIMITATIONS AND UNIFORMITY OF CONDITIONS 1 1. The recommendations of this report pertain only to the site investigated and are based upon the assumption that the soil conditions do not deviate from those disclosed in the I investigation. If any variations or undesirable conditions are encountered during construction, or if the proposed construction will differ from that anticipated herein, Geocon Incorporated should be notified so that supplemental recommendations can be given. The I evaluation or identification of the potential presence of hazardous or corrosive materials was not part of the scope of services provided by Geocon Incorporated. 2. This report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the owner, or of his representative, to ensure that the information and recommendations contained herein are brought to the attention of the architect and engineer for the project and incorporated into the plans, and the necessary steps are taken to see that the contractor and subcontractors carry out such recommendations in the field. I 3. The findings of this report are valid as of the present date. However, changes in the conditions of a property can occur with the passage of time, whether they be due to natural processes or the works of man on this or adjacent properties. In addition, changes in I applicable or appropriate standards may occur, whether they. result from legislation or the broadening of knowledge; Accordingly, the findings of this report may be invalidated wholly I or partially by changes outside our control. Therefore, this report is subject to review and should not be relied upon after a period of three years. I I I I' I I Project No. 06286-31-01 April 16, 1999 r' lIW 3 ;R iT 4ij 1I ________ ' ' - •1- - --: " _______ 'SITE !4&F' FOQST 2300 I , 10R0 3 VISTAr YA C4QS&VD N • OAIR ci' IV c tvf mV1IV MY ACVLRV1 " \ Y 6 CHES \\ VIA 1N0 i S VIA SMIVN 1j HIrLS1 J 11 LAZA 2 FLOR \\ JR Its PT SOURCE: 1998 THOMAS BROTHERS MAP rri 30 28 cmilo SAN DIEGO-COUNTY, CALIFORNIA REPRODUCED WITH PERMISSION GRANTED BY THOMAS BROTHERS MAPS. This MAP IS COPYRIGHTED BY THOMAS BROS. MAPS. IT IS UNLAWFUL TO COPY OR REPRODUCE ALL OR ANY PART THEREOF. WHETHER FOR PERSONAL USE OR RESALE. WITHOUT PERMISSION NO SCALE GE000N INCORPORATED GEOTECI-INICAL CONSULTANTS 6960 FLANDERS DRIVE - SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92121 - 2974 PHONE 619 558-6900 - FAX 619 558-6159 ME / GBP DSK I D000D vici VICINITY MAP MARVER RESIDENCE 2312 KIMBERLY COURT CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA DATE 04-16-1999 IPROJECT NO. 06286- 31 I _ _ a OPE I I LI I I 0 10 20 40 SCALE 1" = 20' GEOCON LEGEND T-2 .......APPROX. LOCATION OF HAND -EXCAVATED TRENCH I S IS ci S PROPOSE 1 $ I I ' I I EXISTING I I RESIDENCE i I ,T2 / Li,! I $ I •1 ! I GEOCON ®r) INCORPORATED GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS 6960 FLANDERS DRIVE - SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92121- 2974 PHONE 619 558-6900 - FAX 619 558-6159 ME/GBP f DSKJE0000 E/R14/GE0101/6286MEDWG/PACO I SITE PLAN I MARVER RESIDENCE 2312 KIMBERLY COURT CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA DATE 04-16-1999 I PROJECT NO. 06286-31 - 01 I FIG. 2 LI I Li I , I I I I L I I COURT I N I I I LI APPENDIX I F, I I I Li I I 1 I I I LI LI I'] I I I I APPENDIX A FIELD INVESTIGATION I The field investigation was performed on March 25, 1999, and consisted of performing 2 hand I excavated trenches. The approximate locations of the trenches are shown on Figure 2. I Relatively undisturbed soil samples were collected using a modified hand driven sampler fitted with brass rings. The sampler was advanced into undisturbed soil using a 10 pound hammer dropped from I a height of 18 inches. A bulk sample was also obtained. The soil samples were described in general conformance with ASTM 2488-93 "Standard Practice for I Description and Identification of Soils" (Visual-Manual Procedure) and logged along with in-place density and moisture test results. The logs of the trenches are presented on Figures A-i and A-2. I I I I I Project No. 06286-31-01 April 16, 1999 I I I 'I I I I I I I I I I - - -7 -- -- -- - SAMPLE SYMBOLS El SAMPLING UNSUCCESSFUL IJ .. STANDARD PENETRATION TEST I ... DRIVE SAMPLE (UNDISTURBED) DISTURBED OR BAG SAMPLE ... CHUNK SAMPLE ... WATER TABLE OR SEEPAGE I PROJECT NO. - 06286-31-01 TRENCH T1 DEPTH SAMPLE o SOIL HI- H '-' CLASS ELEV. (MSL.) 227 DATE COMPLETED 3/25/99 F_IN as Li.. w FEET (USCS) CD EQUIPMENT HAND EXCAVATION MATERIAL DESCRIPTION GRASS/TURF - TI-1 '- CL FILL SOIL Loose, very moist, orange-brown, Clayey, fine to medium SAND with SILT 'I - 2 - SM \ Firm to stiff, very moist, grayish white, fine to J - medium Sandy CLAY / - - Ti 2 / CL/SC - 7 19.2 Medium dense, moist to very moist, orange-brown, - Si1y, fine to medium SAND with CLAY , 1 - ---------------------------- - - :/ Stiff, moist, grayish white, fine to medium Sandy - CLAY/Clayey SAND Medium dense to dense, moist, grayish white, - \ Silty, fine to coarse SAND TRENCH TERMINATED AT 5.2 FEET Figure A-i. Loi!of Trench T 1 NOTE: THE LOG OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS SHOWN HEREON APPLIES ONLY AT THE SPECIFIC BORING OR TRENCH LOCATION AND AT THE DATE INDICATED. IT IS NOT WARRANTED TO BE REPRESENTATIVE OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND TIMES. I TRENCH T 2 DEPTH CD o SOILSAMPLE I- <r u_ FEET NO Z: z CLASS CLASS ELEV. (MSL.) 227 DATE COMPLETED 3/25/99 H 0 -J CD EQUIPMENT HAND EXCAVATION U) L.Lj >.O.. C D 0 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION 0 - ____ ____ _______________________________________ - GRASS/TURF - - SM FILL SOIL - Loose to medium dense, moist, orange-brown, I CL fine to 'I 2 - T2-1 - Firm to stiff, moist, grayish white, fine to medium - Sandy CLAY TRENCH TERMINATED AT 2.3 FEET Figure A-2. Lo of Trench T 2 I I I I I I I I I I I I PROJECT NO. 06296-31-01 I - -- -------- -- D .. SAMPLING UNSUCCESSFUL II ... STANDARD PENETRATION TEST U ... DRIVE SAMPLE (UNDISTURBED) I SAMPLE SYMBOLS DISTURBED OR BAG SAMPLE ... CHUNK SAMPLE ... WATER TABLE OR SEEPAGE I NOTE: THE LOG OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS SHOWN HEREON APPLIES ONLY AT THE SPECIFIC BORING OR TRENCH LOCATION AND AT THE DATE INDICATED. IT IS NOT WARRANTED TO BE REPRESENTATIVE OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND TIMES. I I APPENDIX I E I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I APPENDIX B LABORATORY TESTING Laboratory tests were performed in accordance with the general test methods of the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) or other suggested procedures. Selected bulk and in situ soil samples were tested for their shear strength and expansion characteristics, and in-place dry density and moisture content. The results of these tests are summarized on Tables B-I and B-Il. The in-place dry density and moisture content of the samples tested is presented on the trench logs in Appendix A, as well. TABLE B-I SUMMARY OF DIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS I Sample No. Dry Density Moisture Content Unit Cohesion I Angle of Shear I (pci) I (%) I (psi) Resistance (degrees) I 11-2 112.7 19.2 800 19 Dry density is median density of rings used in direct shear test. TABLE B-Il SUMMARY OF LABORATORY EXPANSION INDEX TEST RESULTS Sample No. Moisture Content Dry Density (pci) Expansion Index Before Test (%) I After Test (%) TI-1 10.1 26.5 110.0 36 Project No. 06286-3 1-01 April 16, 1999 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I APPENDIX 1 Iii I I I I I I I Ii I I APPENDIX C I RECOMMENDED GRADING SPECIFICATIONS I for MARVER RESIDENCE I CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA PROJECT NO. 06286-31-01 I I I I I I I I RECOMMENDED GRADING SPECIFICATIONS 1. GENERAL 1.1. These Recommended Grading Specifications shall be used in conjunction with the Geotechnical Report for the project prepared by Geocon Incorporated. The recom- mendations contained in the text of the Geotechnical Report are a part of the earthwork and grading specifications and shall supersede the provisions contained hereinafter in the case of conflict. 1.2. Prior to the commencement of grading, a geotechnical consultant (Consultant) shall be employed for the purpose of observing earthwork procedures and testing the fills for substantial conformance with the recommendations of the Geotechnical Report and these specifications. It will be necessary that the Consultant provide adequate testing and observation services so that he may determine that, in his opinion, the work was performed in substantial conformance with these specifications. It shall be the responsibility of the Contractor to assist the Consultant and keep him apprised of work schedules and changes so that personnel may be scheduled accordingly. I 1.3. It shall be the sole responsibility of the Contractor to provide adequate equipment and methods to accomplish the work in accordance with applicable grading codes or agency ordinances, these specifications and the approved grading plans. If, in the opinion of the I Consultant, unsatisfactory conditions such as questionable soil materials, poor moisture condition, inadequate compaction, adverse weather, and so forth, result in a quality of work I . not in conformance with these specifications, the Consultant will be empowered to reject the work and recommend to the Owner that construction be stopped until the unacceptable conditions are corrected. I 2. DEFINITIONS 2.1. Owner shall refer to the owner of the property or the entity on whose behalf the grading I work is being performed and who has contracted with the Contractor to have grading performed. 2.2. Contractor shall refer to the Contractor performing the site grading work. I 2.3. Civil Engineer or Engineer of Work shall refer to the California licensed Civil Engineer or consulting firm responsible for preparation of the grading plans, surveying and verifying as-graded topography. I GI rev. 8/98 I I 2.4. Consultant shall refer to the soil engineering and engineering geology consulting firm retained to provide geotechnical services for the project. 2.5. Soil Engineer shall refer to a California licensed Civil Engineer retained by the Owner, who is experienced in the practice of geotechnical engineering. The Soil Engineer shall be responsible for having qualified representatives on-site to observe and test the Contractor's work for conformance with these specifications. 2.6. Engineering Geologist shall refer to a California licensed Engineering Geologist retained by the Owner to provide geologic observations and recommendations during the site grading. 2.7. Geotechnical Report shall refer to a soil report (including all addenda) which may include a geologic reconnaissance or geologic investigation that was prepared specifically for the development of the project for which these Recommended Grading Specifications are intended to apply. 3. MATERIALS 3.1. Materials for compacted fill shall consist of any soil excavated from the cut areas or imported to the site that, in the opinion of the Consultant, is suitable for use in construction of fills. In general, fill materials can be classified as soil fills, soil-rock fills or rock fills, as defined below. 3.1.1. Soil fills are defined as fills containing no rocks or hard lumps greater than 12 inches in maximum dimension and containing at least 40 percent by weight of material smaller than 3/4 inch in size. 3.1.2. Soil-rock fills are defined as fills containing no rocks or hard lumps larger than 4 feet in maximum dimension and containing a sufficient matrix of soil fill to allow for proper compaction of soil fill around the rock fragments or hard lumps as specified in Paragraph 6.2. Oversize rock is defined as material greater than 12 inches. 3.1.3. Rock fills are defined as fills containing no rocks or hard lumps larger than 3 feet in maximum dimension and containing little or no fines. Fines are defined as material smaller than 3/4 inch in maximum dimension. The quantity of fines shall be less than approximately 20 percent of the rock fill quantity. I I GE rev. 8/98 I I I n I I I I I I I I I I I I I 3.2. Material of a perishable, spongy, or otherwise unsuitable nature as determined by the Consultant shall not be used in fills. 3.3. Materials used for fill, either imported or on-site, shall not contain hazardous materials as defined by the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 30, Articles 9 I and 10; 40CFR; and any other applicable local, state or federal laws. The Consultant shall not be responsible for the identification or analysis of the potential presence of hazardous I suspect materials. However, if observations, odors or soil discoloration cause Consultant to the presence of hazardous materials, the Consultant may request from the Owner the termination of grading operations within the affected area. Prior to resuming grading I operations, the Owner shall provide a written report to the Consultant indicating that the suspected materials are not hazardous as defined by applicable laws and regulations. 3.4. The outer 15 feet of soil-rock fill slopes, measured horizontally, should be composed of properly compacted soil fill materials approved by the Consultant. Rock fill may extend to I the slope face, provided that the slope is not steeper than 2:1 (horizontal:vertical) and a soil layer no thicker than 12 inches is track-walked onto the face for landscaping purposes. I This procedure may be utilized, provided it is acceptable to the governing agency, Owner and Consultant. 3.5. Representative samples of soil materials to be used for fill shall be tested in the laboratory by the Consultant to determine the maximum density, optimum moisture content, and, I where appropriate, shear strength, expansion, and gradation characteristics of the soil. 3.6. During grading, soil or groundwater conditions other than those identified in the I Geotechnical Report may be encountered by the Contractor. The Consultant shall be notified immediately to evaluate the significance of the unanticipated condition I 4. CLEARING AND PREPARING AREAS TO BE FILLED I 4.1. Areas to be excavated and filled shall be cleared and grubbed. Clearing shall consist of complete removal above the ground surface of trees, stumps, brush, vegetation, man-made I structures and similar debris. Grubbing shall consist of removal of stumps, roots, buried logs and other unsuitable material and shall be performed in areas to be graded. Roots and I other projections exceeding 1-1/2 inches in diameter shall be removed to a depth of 3 feet below the surface of the ground. Borrow areas shall be grubbed to the extent necessary to provide suitable fill materials. I I I GI rev. 8/98 4.2. Any asphalt pavement material removed during clearing operations should be properly disposed at an approved offsite facility. Concrete fragments which are free of reinforcing steel may be placed in fills, provided they are placed in accordance with Section 6.2 or 6.3 of this document. 4.3. After clearing and grubbing of organic matter or other unsuitable material, loose or porous soils shall be removed to the depth recommended in the Geotechnical Report. The depth of removal and compaction shall be observed and approved by a representative of the Consultant. The exposed surface shall then be plowed or scarified to a minimum depth of 6 inches and until the surface is free from uneven features that would tend to prevent uniform compaction by the equipment to be used. 4.4. Where the slope ratio of the original ground is steeper than 6:1 (horizontal:vertical), or where recommended by the Consultant, the original ground should be benched in accordance with the following illustration. TYPICAL BENCHING DETAIL I Finish Grade Original Ground 2 I Finish Slope Surface I I I I Remove All - Unsuitable Material As Recommended By Soil Engineer Slope To Be Such That Sloughing Or Sliding Does Not Occur Varies See Note 1 See Note 2 No Scale I [1 I DETAIL NOTES Key width "B" should be a minimum of 10 feet wide, or sufficiently wide to permit complete coverage with the compaction equipment used. The base of the key should be graded horizontal, or inclined slightly into the natural slope. The outside of the bottom key should be below the topsoil or unsuitable surficial material and at least 2 feet into dense formational material. Where hard rock is exposed in the bottom of the key, the depth and configuration of the key may be modified as approved by the Consultant. I GE rev. 8/98 I I 1 I 1 I I I H "1 I . 4.5. After areas to receive fill have been cleared, plowed or scarified, the surface should be disced or bladed by the Contractor until it is uniform and free from large clods. The area should then be moisture conditioned to achieve the proper moisture content, and compacted I as recommended in Section 6.0 of these specifications. 1 5. COMPACTION EQUIPMENT 5.1. Compaction of soil or soil-rock fill shall be accomplished by sheepsfoot or segmented-steel I wheeled rollers, vibratory rollers, multiple-wheel pneumatic-tired rollers, or other types of acceptable compaction equipment. Equipment shall be of such a design that it will be I capable of compacting the soil or soil-rock fill to the specified relative compaction at the specified moisture content. 5.2. Compaction of rock fills shall be performed in accordance with Section 6.3. 1 6. PLACING, SPREADING AND COMPACTION OF FILL MATERIAL I 6.1. Soil fill, as defined in Paragraph 3.1.1, shall be placed by the Contractor in accordance with the following recommendations: 1 6.1. 1. Soil fill shall be placed by the Contractor in layers that, when compacted, should generally not exceed 8 inches. Each layer shall be spread evenly and shall be I thoroughly mixed during spreading to obtain uniformity of material and moisture in each layer. The entire fill shall be constructed as a unit in nearly level lifts. I. Rock materials greater than 12 inches in maximum dimension shall be placed in accordance with Section 6.2 or 6.3 of these specifications. I 6.1.2. In general, the soil fill shall be compacted at a moisture content at or above the optimum moisture content as determined by ASTM D1557-91. 6.1.3. When the moisture content of soil fill is below that specified by the Consultant, I water shall be added by the Contractor until the moisture content is in the range specified. I 6.1.4. When the moisture content of the soil fill is above the range specified by the Consultant or too wet to achieve proper compaction, the soil fill shall be aerated by I the Contractor by blading/mixing, or other satisfactory methods until the moisture content is within the range specified. I I GI rev. 8/98 I . I I I I I . I I I I I 6.2. I I I I. I. I I - 6.1.5. After each layer has been placed, mixed, and spread evenly, it shall be thoroughly compacted by the Contractor to a relative compaction of at least 90 percent. Relative compaction is defined as the ratio (expressed in percent) of the in-place dry density of the compacted fill to the maximum laboratory dry density as determined in accordance with ASTM D1557-91. Compaction shall be continuous over the entire area, and compaction equipment shall make sufficient passes so that the specified minimum relative compaction has been achieved throughout the entire fill. 6.1.6. Soils having an Expansion Index of greater than 50 may be used in fills if placed at least 3 feet below finish pad grade and should be compacted at a moisture content generally 2 to 4 percent greater than the optimum moisture content for the material. 6.1.7. Properly compacted soil fill shall extend to the design surface of fill slopes. To achieve proper compaction, it is recommended that fill slopes be over-built by at least 3 feet and then cut to the design grade. This procedure is considered preferable to track-walking of slopes, as described in the following paragraph. 6.1.8. As an alternative to over-building of slopes, slope faces may be back-rolled with a heavy-duty loaded sheepsfoot or vibratory roller at maximum 4-foot fill height intervals. Upon completion, slopes should then be track-walked with a D-8 dozer or similar equipment, such that a dozer track covers all slope surfaces at least twice. Soil-rock fill, as defined in Paragraph 3.1.2, shall be placed by the Contractor in accordance with the following recommendations: 6.2.1. Rocks larger than 12 inches but less than 4 feet in maximum dimension may be incorporated into the compacted soil fill, but shall be limited to the area measured 15 feet minimum horizontally from the slope face and 5 feet below finish grade or 3 feet below the deepest utility, whichever is deeper. 6.2.2. Rocks or rock fragments up to 4 feet in maximum dimension may either be individually placed or placed in windrows. Under certain conditions, rocks or rock fragments up to 10 feet in maximum dimension may be placed using similar methods. The acceptability of placing rock materials greater than 4 feet in maximum dimension shall be evaluated during grading as specific cases arise and shall be approved by the Consultant prior to placement. GI rev. 8/98 I 6.2.3. For individual placement, sufficient space shall be provided between rocks to allow for passage of compaction equipment. 1 6.2.4. For windrow placement, the rocks should be placed in trenches excavated in properly compacted soil fill. Trenches should be approximately 5 feet wide and 4 I feet deep in maximum dimension. The voids around and beneath rocks should be filled with approved granular soil having a Sand Equivalent of 30 or greater and should be compacted by flooding. Windrows may also be placed utilizing an I "open-face" method in lieu of the trench procedure, however, this method should first be approved by the Consultant. 6.2.5. Windrows should generally be parallel to each other and may be placed either I . parallel to or perpendicular to the face of the slope depending on the site geometry. The minimum horizontal spacing for windrows shall be 12 feet center-to-center with a 5-foot stagger or offset from lower courses to next I overlying course. The minimum vertical spacing between windrow courses shall be 2 feet from the top of a lower windrow to the bottom of the next higher I 6.2.6. All rock placement, fill placement and flooding of approved granular soil in the I windrows must be continuously observed by the Consultant or his representative. I 6.1 Rock fills, as defined in Section 3.1.3., shall be placed by the Contractor in accordance with the following recommendations: 1 6.3.1. The base of the rock fill shall be placed on a sloping surface (minimum slope of 2 percent, maximum slope of 5 percent). The surface shall slope toward suitable I subdrainage outlet facilities. The rock fills shall be provided with subdrains during construction so that a hydrostatic pressure buildup does not develop. The I subdrains shall be permanently connected to controlled drainage facilities to control post-construction infiltration of water. 1 6.3.2. Rock fills shall be placed in lifts not exceeding 3 feet. Placement shall be by rock trucks traversing previously placed lifts and dumping at the edge of the currently I placed lift. Spreading of the rock fill shall be by dozer to facilitate seating of the rock. The rock fill shall be watered heavily during placement. Watering shall consist of water trucks traversing in front of the current rock lift face and spraying I water continuously during rock placement. Compaction equipment with compactive energy comparable to or greater than that of a 20-ton steel vibratory I roller or other compaction equipment providing suitable energy to achieve the I GI rev. 8/98 IT I LI 7, Lj required compaction or deflection as recommended in Paragraph 6.3.3 shall be utilized. The number of passes to be made will be determined as described in Paragraph 6.3.3: Once a rock fill lift has been covered with soil fill, no additional rock fill lifts will be permitted over the soil fill. 6.3.3. Plate bearing tests, in accordance with ASTM Dl 196-64, may be performed in both the compacted soil fill and in the rock fill to aid in determining the number of passes of the compaction equipment to be performed. If performed, a minimum of three plate bearing tests shall be performed in the properly compacted soil fill (minimum relative* compaction of 90 percent). Plate bearing tests shall then be performed on areas of rock fill having two passes, four passes and six passes of the compaction equipment, respectively. The number of passes required for the rock fill shall be determined by comparing the results of the plate bearing tests for the soil fill and the rock fill and by evaluating the deflection variation with number of passes. The required number of passes of the compaction equipment will be performed as necessary until the plate bearing deflections are equal to or less than that determined for the properly compacted soil fill. In no case will the required number of passes be less than two. 6.3.4. A representative of the Consultant shall be present during rock fill operations to verify that the minimum number of "passes" have been obtained, that water is being properly applied and that specified procedures are being followed. The actual number of plate bearing tests will be determined by the Consultant during grading. In general, at least one test should be performed for each approximately 5,000 to 10,000 cubic yards of rock fill placed. 6.3.5. Test pits shall be excavated by the Contractor so that the Consultant can state that, in his opinion, sufficient water is present and that voids between large rocks are properly filled with smaller rock material. In-place density testing will not be required in the rock fills. 6.3.6. To reduce the potential for "piping" of fines into the rock fill from overlying soil fill material, a 2-foot layer of graded filter material shall be placed above the uppermost lift of rock fill. The need to place graded filter material below the rock should be determined by the Consultant prior to commencing grading. The gradation of the graded filter material will be determined at the time the rock fill is being excavated. Materials typical of the rock fill should be submitted to the Consultant in a timely manner, to allow design of the graded filter prior to the commencement of rock fill placement. I I I I I I I I I I LI GI rev. 8/98 I 6.3.7. All rock fill placement shall be continuously observed during placement by representatives of the Consultant. I 7. OBSERVATION AND TESTING I 7.1. The Consultant shall be the Owners representative to observe and perform tests during clearing, grubbing, filling and compaction operations. In general, no more than 2 feet in vertical elevation of soil or soil-rock fill shall be placed without at least one field density I test being performed within that interval. In addition, a minimum of one field density test shall be performed for every 2,000 cubic yards of soil or soil-rock fill placed and I compacted. 7.2. The Consultant shall perform random field density tests of the compacted soil or soil-rock I fill to provide a basis for expressing an opinion as to whether the fill material is compacted as specified. Density tests shall be performed in the compacted materials below any disturbed surface. When these tests indicate that the density of any layer of fill or portion thereof is below that specified, the particular layer or areas represented by the test shall be reworked until the specified density has been achieved. 7.3. During placement of rock fill, the Consultant shall verify that the minimum number of I passes have been obtained per the criteria discussed in Section 6.3.3. The Consultant shall request the -excavation of observation pits and may perform plate bearing tests on the I placed rock fills. The observation pits will be excavated to provide a basis for expressing an opinion as to whether the rock fill is properly seated and sufficient moisture has been applied to the material. If performed, plate bearing tests will be performed randomly on I the surface of the most-recently placed lift. Plate bearing tests will be performed to provide a basis for expressing an opinion as to whether the rock fill is adequately seated. The I maximum deflection in the rock fill determined in Section 6.3.3 shall be less than the maximum deflection of the properly compacted soil fill. When any of the above criteria indicate that a layer of rock fill or any portion thereof is below that specified, the affected I layer or area shall be reworked until the rock fill has been adequately seated and sufficient moisture applied. 7.4. A settlement monitoring program designed by the Consultant may be conducted in areas of rock fill placement. The specific design of the monitoring program shall be as recommended in the Conclusions and Recommendations section of the project Geotechnical Report or in the final report of testing and observation services performed I during grading. I I GI rev. 8/98 I I 7.5. The Consultant shall observe the placement of subdrains, to verify that the drainage devices have been placed and constructed in substantial conformance with project specifications. 7.6. Testing procedures shall conform to the following Standards as appropriate: 7.6.1. Soil and Soil-Rock Fills: I 7.6.1.1. Field Density Test, ASTM D1556-82, Density of Soil In-Place By the Sand-Cone Method 7.6.1.2. Field Density Test, Nuclear Method, ASTM D2922-81, Density of-Soil and I Soil-Aggregate In-Place by Nuclear Methods (Shallow Depth). 7.6.1.3. Laboratory Compaction Test, ASTM D1557-91, Moisture-Density I Relations, of Soils and Soil-Aggregate Mixtures Using 10-Pound Hammer and 18-Inch Drop. I 7.6.1.4. Expansion Index Test, Uniform Building Code Standard 29-2, Expansion Index Test. I 7.6.2. Rock Fills 7.6.2.1. Field Plate Bearing Test, ASTM D1196-64 (Reapproved 1977) Standard I Methodfor Nonrepresentative Static Plate 'Load Tests of Soils' and Flexible Pavement Components, For Use in Evaluation and Design of Airport and Highway Pavements. I 8. PROTECTION OF WORK 8.1. During construction, the Contractor shall properly grade all excavated surfaces to provide I positive drainage and prevent ponding of water. Drainage of surface water shall be controlled to avoid damage to adjoining properties or to fmished work on the site. The 1 Contractor shall take remedial measures to prevent erosion of freshly graded areas until such time as permanent drainage and erosion control features have been installed. Areas I subjected to erosion or sedimentation shall be properly prepared in accordance with the Specifications prior to placing additional fill or structures. 8.2. After completion of grading as observed and tested by the Consultant, no further excavation or filling shall be conducted except in conjunction with the services of the I Consultant. [1 fl Li GI rev. 8/98 1 I 9. CERTIFICATIONS AND FINAL REPORTS 9.1. Upon completion of the work, Contractor shall furnish Owner a certification by the Civil I Engineer stating that the lots and/or building pads are graded to within 0.1 foot vertically of elevations shown on the grading plan and that all tops and toes of slopes are within 0.5 foot horizontally of the positions shown on the grading plans. After installation of a section of I subdrain, the project Civil Engineer should survey its location and prepare an as-built plan of the subdrain location. The project Civil Engineer should verify the proper outlet for the subdrains and the Contractor should ensure that the drain system is free of obstructions. 9.2. The Owner is responsible for furnishing a final as-graded soil and geologic report satisfactory to the appropriate governing or accepting agencies. The as-graded report should be prepared and signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer experienced in I geotechnical engineering and by a California Certified Engineering Geologist, indicating that the geotechnical aspects of the grading were performed in substantial conformance with the Specifications or approved changes to the Specifications. I I I I I I I I I I - GI rev. 8/98 City of Carlsbad 09/17/1999 Plan Check Revision Permit No:PCR99232 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 438-3101 Job Address: 2312 KIMBERLY CT CBAD Permit Type: PCR Parcel No: 1675313300 Lot #: 0 Valuation: $0.00 Construction Type: NEW Reference #: CB990456 Project Title: ADD 12' HEADER W/SLIDER Status: ISSUED Applied: 09/15/1999 Entered By: JM Plan Approved: 09/16/1999 Issued: 09/17/1999 Inspect Area: Applicant: WEBER STEVEN 7930 LA CAPELA CARLSBAD CA 92009 760-753-8486 MARVER DANA 23112 KIMBERLY jo I CARLSBAD CA 92db8 IATI Total Fees: $0.00 / Tôtl Rgyments tD%ejçV' $0.00\ '-' Balance Due: $0.00 Plan Check Revision Fee al (n INCORPORATED c.z 1952 gb~ 0 FINAL APPROVAL Inspector: Date: ______________ Clearance: NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the lmposition' of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as fees/exactions." You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capactiy changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired. CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (760) 438-1161 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY PLAN CHECK NO. ?2?99l'32- EST. VAL. Plan Ck. Deposit Validated By_ C1VAA PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT. 2075 Lab Palmas Dr., Carlsbad CA 92009 (760) 438-1161 S -- - ?-- ?_ I 2RO4ECT thWORMATIÔN ' I -' ................. Address (include Bldg/Suite #) Business Name (at this address) Legal Description . . Lot No. Subdivision Name/Number . . Unit No. Phase No. Total # of units Assessor's Parcel # - Existing Use . . Proposed Use Des ription of Work AVO (2.- . . . . SQ. FT. #of Stories fJJLQL.y' # of Bedrooms # of Bathrooms :2. L Name . . Address City State/Zip Telephone # Fax # AFPLICANT D Cont'r'actor 0 Agent for Contractor 0 Owner OAgoni for Q.'...- Name Address City State/Zip Telephone # 4 PHOPERTY OWMEh . . . Name Address City State/Zip Telephone # 5TIR C0MPANAME' - - - (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Codel or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption: Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars 1S5001). Name . Address . . . City State/Zip Telephone # - State License # License Class City Business License # Designer Name , Address . . City State/Zip Telephone State License # 6 WORKERS COMPENSATION ' Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: C] I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. o I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Insurance Company . Policy No. Expiration Date__________________ (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS-1$1100) OR LESS) CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shell subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars ($ 100.000), in addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3,706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees. SIGNATURE DATE 7 OWNER BUILDER DECLARATION I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason:. El I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). C3 I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed Contractors to construct the project (Sac: 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such'projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License-Law). . . .. C1 I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason: I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. 'F_] YES ONO I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / Contractors license number) 4.'. I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): 5. I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type of work): PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE DATE COMPLETE Tills SECTIONOR NON.RESIDEN1iAi8UILDlNG FERMIt&dNLY - Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form Or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? 0 YES 0 NO - Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? 0 YES 0 NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? 0 YES 0 NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. WK iI 1A I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097(i) Civil Code). LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS IR __________________________________________________________ 9TAPPLICA ICE " T. - I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction: I hereby authorize representatives of the Cite' of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0 deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. EXPIRATION: Every permit i sued by the Building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such p mit s not commenced within 365 ys fr the date of such permit or if the-building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time a ~nc a pe od of 8 days (Section 106.4.4 Uniform Building Code). APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE WHITE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance