The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2319 PIO PICO DR; ; CB994162; PermitCity of Carlsbad J, 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 05I10/2001 Residential Permit Permit No:CB994162 - Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 Job Address: 2319 PlO PICO DR CBAD Permit Type: RESDNTL Sub Type: SFD Status: ISSUED Parcel No: 1563500400 Lot #: 0 Applied: 11/04/1999 Valuation: $159,906.00 Construction Type: VN Entered By: RMA Occupancy Group: Reference #: Plan Approved: 08/02/2000 # Dwelling Units: 1 Structure Type: SFD Issued: 08/02/2000 Bedrooms: 3 Bathrooms: 2.5 Inspect Area: SR Project Title: MOORE RES-1736 SF+694 GAR+1 19 Orig PC#: SF BALCONY Plan Check#: Applicant: D J MOORE 1073 SAPPHIRE ST SAN DIEGO CA 92109 Total Fees: $17,049:67 / .Owner: 8984 05/10/01 Total Paymnts To Date: $14,549:67 ''c\lance Due: 0002 01 02 COP 250000 $2,500.00 IM /j$831.08 'Mth'r" e Size "$0.00—Addi Reck-Water,Con. Fee 40.20 Meter. Fee $0.00 SDCWA Fee $0.00 CFD PayoffFee $15.99\ FFJ - $6 66 r PFF (CFD Fund) $6.60 iid'ènse Tax c'C\ $0.00.. Licen'se Ta (CFD Fund) \ \$0.Q0 1Trffic Impat Fe e. /' \ $0.00 'Tf'affic.Impct (CFD Fund) \ $0.00 SideaIk Fee / I LI n- r \N$0.00 INC0 4?NG TOTAL' Renewal Fee \, $0.00 ELECTRICALJOTAL / Add'l Renewal Fee \ $0.00.,.. MECHANICAL TOTAL / Other Building Fee 'Y $0.00 Fe Housing Impact / Pot. Water Con. Fee N $2,400.od) Housing InLiu Meter Size 'N D5!8 116 MaterDrainage Fee: / Add'l Pot. Water Con. Fee $0.00 Sewer ,Fè& Red. Water Con. Fee '—$0.00 Additional Fees: TOTAL PERMIT FEES Building Permit / Add'l Building Permit Fe'Z Plan Check / TT— Add'l Plan Check Fee Plan Check Discount 'Strong Motion Fee Q~--9 Park in Lieu Fee Park Fee LFM Fee Bridge Fee Other Bridge Fee BTD #2 Fee $0.00 $80.00 $1"871.00 $0.00 $2,910.29 $2,686.42 1 $0.00 I $0.00 $418.00 /$161.00 $472.00 $0.00 $60.00 $54.50 $0.00 $0.00 $152.19 $4,397.00 $0.00 $17,049.67 FINAL APPROVAL inspector: Date: - - b' Clearance: NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as lees/exactions." You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carisbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capactiy changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired. 'cL PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad CA 92009 (760)438-1161 - FOR OFFICE USE ONLY PLAN CHECK NO. 9/2 EST. VAL. /_ cc7 / go Plan Ck. Deposit FL o Validated By Date Address (inc.ide Bldg/Suite #) Business Name (at this address) Name Address City State/Zip Telephone # 4. PROPERTY OWNER Name Address City S.tate/Zip Telephone # I5TCONTRACToRCOMPANY•NAME 1 (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law [Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code] or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violatiopof Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars l$50011. Name Address City - State/Zip Telephone # State License # License Class City Business License # Designer Name Address City State/Zip Telephone State License # [6 COMPENSATION - -• Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: 0 I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. o I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Insurance Company Policy No. Expiration Date__________________ (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($1001 OR LESS) C] CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), in addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees. SIGNATURE DATE 7TOWNERBUILDERbECL1ARATION : 1 I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: 0 I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). jtfl I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason: I 1. I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for Construction of the proposed property improvement. 0 YES []NO I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): I plan to provide portions of the work, bu I hve hired the following rson to coordinate supervise a r vide the aor rk I ci de jam 7 / a1dress,,phone number / contractors license number):ROgE.T /CP'RLINJ 14021 lCPt12Mfl C(Ek.. RIhD R7)1&U ,?!A /2% t76O5'q-H42 535 5. I will provide some of the wofR>ut I h(ie ntracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address I phone number / type of work): \ I I OWNER .DATE (0 - I -'J--, Is the applicant or future building occupant equired to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 2534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? 0 YES 0 NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? 0 YES 0 NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? 0 YES 0 NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. [äT CONSTRUCTION LENDING-AGENCY - - -" I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 30970) Civil Code). LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS__________________________________________________________ L!CANT.iCERTIFICATION I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is-correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the Cit, of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0 deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the Building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is t commenced2thin65 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authRrized by such permit is suspended or abandgned at any time after is w is com€Dpd f'aperiod of 180 days (Section 106.4.4 Uniform Building Code). / APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE IL 4.4.t4,,7 DATE /tk' WHITE: File YELLOW: Applicant ' PINK: Finance 0 Job Address: 2319 PlO PICO DR Suite: Lot Location: APPLICANT D J MOORE Owner: CD. Description 19 Final Structural 29 Final Plumbing 39 Final Electrical 49 Final Mechanical Act Comments F,u4-- 6 k . City of CarIsàd Bldg Inspection Request For: 06/14/2001 Permit# CB994162 Title: MOORE RES-1736 SF+694 GAR+119 Description: SF BALCONY Type: RESDNTL Sub Type: SFD Remarks: Total Time: Inspector Assignment: GG Phone: 7605972900 Inspector: Requested By: BOB CARLIN Entered By: CHRISTINE Associated PCRs Inspection History Date Description Act Insp Comments 06/12/2001 89 Final Combo CO NF SEE NOTICE ATTACHED 06/08/2001 19 Final Structural NR GG 06/08/2001 29 Final Plumbing NR GG 06/08/2001 39 Final Electrical . AP GG OTRM 06/08/2001 49 Final Mechanical NR GG 05/15/2001 22Sewer/WaterService AP SR 05/15/2001 25 Water HeaterNents CO SR NEED B VENT HOOKED UP/NEED HOT & COLD INSULATION ON COPER PIPE 04/13/2001 17 Interior Lath/Drywall CO SR DOES NOT NEED A FLOAT INSPEC FOR TILE 03/12/2001 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall AP SR 03/06/2001 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall CO SR REQUIRES MORE STAPLES/NEED TO WATER PROOF BUILDING WITH CAULKING 03/05/2001 17 Interior Lath/Drywall AP SR 03/05/2001 23 Gas/Test/Repairs AP SR 03/05/2001 27 Shower Pan/Roman Tubs AP SR 03/02/2001 17 Interior Lath/Drywall CA SR 02/23/2001 14 Frame/Seel/Bolting/Welding AP SR LETTER OF CORRECTION ATTACHED Fm~—Owo,.,P-7 1 City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request , X40 For: 06/14/2001 Permit# CB994162 02/23/2001 16 Insulation 02/23/2001 24 Rough/Topout 02/16/2001 23 Gas/Test/Repairs 02/16/2001 24 Rough/Topout 02/15/2001 34 Rough Electric 02/15/2001 44 Rough/Ducts/Dampers. 12/26/2000 83 Roof Sheathing/Ext Shear 12/11/2000 13 Shear Panels/HD's 10/13/2000 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers, 10/06/2000 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 10/06/2000 13 Shear Panels/HD's 10/06/2000 21 Underground/under Floor 10/05/2000 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 10/05/2000 62 Steel/Bond Beam 09/13/2000 61 Footing Inspector Assignment: GG AP SR AP SR CO SR NO TEST UNTIL D.W. IS IN PLACE CO SR NO TOPOUT IN UP STAIRS BATHROOM AP SR AP SR AP GG CO SR STRAPS / A-35 AND SHEAR PANEL SIZES NOT AS PER PLAN - NEED ENGINEERING NOTICE AP SR OK TO POUR AP SR OK TO POUR FRONT FTG & GROUT WC SR AP SR CO SR CONTINOUS FTG OK NEED TO SEE STRONG WALL HARDWARE IN PLACE AP SR OK TO GROUT AP SR IST BILK FTGONLY \ i City of Carlsbad Final Building Inspection Dept: Building igineejjng. Planning CMWD St Lite Fire "_t __- ........ LJUN 5 2001 CITY OF CARLSBAD Plan Check #: Date: 06/04/2001 Permit #: CB994162 Permit Type: RESDNTL Project Name: MOORE RES-1736 SF+694 GAR+119 Sub Type: SFD SF BALCONY Address: 2319 PlO PICO DR Lot: 0 Contact Person: Phone: Sewer Dist: CA Water Dist: CA Inspected Date By: r-kC ANA4AtJ Inspected: 5 Approved: ' Disapproved: Inspected Date By: Inspected: Approved: Disapproved: Inspected Date By: Inspected: Approved: ______ Disapproved: Comments: SOUTH COAST STRUCTURAL DESIGN 2415 San Diego Avenue, Suite 200 San Diego, CA 92110 (619)291-4224 December 22, 2000 Bob Carlin BC Drafting 710 S. Rancho Santa Fe Road San Marcos, CA 92069 Project: Moore Residence Re: Field, Corrections Mr. Carlin, In accordance with your request, we have reviewed the "marked-up" (revised) framing plans and our original structural calculations for the above referenced project. Specifically, we were asked to review the documents with fespect to various shearwalls with constructed lengths less than that specified on the approved set of drawings. We understand that the field inspector has requested that we review these shearwalls, and verify their structural adequacy considering the reduced lengths. Based on our review of the documents, we performed additional structural calculations (attached), and have determined the following: The 5'-9" Type "1" SW at line V2 (2nd Floor) remains okay by inspection. A sill plate retrofit detail has been provided to remedy the missed 3x sill plate at the Type "6" SW located at line "c" (2' Floor). The 15'-8" Type SW at line (1St Floor) remains adequate. The Type "2" SW's located at lines "3" & (St Floor) remain adequate despite the plan modifications. This is based upon the following remaining lengths: 5'-4" & 4'-8" (Line "3") and 21-031, 3'-313, 6143, & 3'-5" (Line "4"). Please note that the entire wall at line (Vt Floor) should be sheathed (including above & below openings), and horizontal straps shall be added at corners of all openings (from headers/sills to 4x blocking in adjacent walls). Use LSTA24 Straps. The 5'-2" Type "3" SW at line "D" remains okay. The 15'-4" Type "1" SW at line "Dl" remains okay. The 4'-0" & 7'-8" Type "3" SW's at line "E" remain okay. Respectfully Submitted, ;SOUTH UT S DESIGN Mike ur4 S.E. (Attachment) JOB __99 115 ________ SHEFs NO. CAL.CULATD av CHECKED a? OATZ SCALE SOUTH COAST STRUCTURAL DESIGN 1r Story Sheirwalls Direction Unit Lateral Load, v = 3 psf Gridline it Tributary Area (This Level): s. ft Lateral Load (This Level): A S 4 .. Lbs Lateral Load (Level Above:): 4 411 Lbs - Total Load (All Levels), F = 641 k Lbs Shearwail(s) Length. L = - ft- Unit Wall Shear, v=FJL If . Shearwall Type: 0vertii1ning L = ft. - Okay by tnwecrion Uplift = Lbs Holdown Anchor Type: - Gridline TthburaryArea (this Levei): sq.ft. Lateral Load (Th±s Level): . 3542-Lbs Lateral Load (Level Above): Lbs Total Load (All Levels'. F. = 41 Lbs Shearwall(-s) Length., L = )5,;, ft. - - UmtWallShear,v=FIL =25 3 pif . Shearwail Type: Oertnrning: L= ft. Okay by Inspection Uplift =____________ Lbs Holdown Anchor Type: - Gridline___________ Tributary Area (This Level): sq. ft. Lateral Load (This Level): Lbs Lateral Load (Level Above): Lbs Shearwall(s) Length, L = Unit Wall Shear, v=F/L = Shear,vall Type: (J Overturning: L Uplift Holdown Anchor Type: Total Load (All Levels), F = ft. ,.. I'. c'_) •e No. 352 I_cLIi pif ft. Okay by Inspection SOUTH COAST STRUCTURAL DESIGN O8 s1E5T o. .3 CF ______ C.LCUL.TD BY OAT- CHECKED BY OAT SCALE - _Story Shenrwalls E-jDirectiou Unit Lateral Load,r 4.5 pst Grid1ine I) Tributary Area (This Level): 45 sä. Lateral Load (This Level): Lateral Load (Level Above.): - Total Load (All Levels), F = Shearwall(s) Length, L I to— ft. Unit Wall Shear, v=F 12 lf Sheniwall Type: O'vertnrning: L = ft. - Okay byinspecrion Uplift= Holdown Anchor Type: Gridline__________ Tributary Area (This Level): Lateral Load (This Level): Lateral Load (Level Above): Total Load (All Levels), F Shearwall(-s) Length, L 15 ft. Unit Wall Shear, v = FdL = tCc.2 p1f . ____ Shearw1 Type: O'vertnrning: L ft. u-'-Okay by Inspection Uplift Lbs Holdown Anchor Type: Gridline E Tributary Area (This Level): 44+ Lateral Load (This Level): 1 _91 Lbs Lateral Load (Level Above): k430 Lbs Total Load (All Levels), F= Lbs Shearwall(s) Length, L = II' 0 ft. S42..-p1f 5C Shearwall Type:' No. 4352 Overturning: L = rt. - Okay by Inspection 2 Exp. 5- * UpIlIt Holdown Anchor Type: '. •DIT o X-5 Lbs 4O Lbs G.5 Lbs Lbs sq. ft. Lbs Lbs Lbs 4 SOUTH COAST STRUCTURAL DESIGN JOB SHEET NO. OF CALCULATED By DATE CHECKED BY DATE SCALE CQ'1T. DSL - TOP PLATES L5T424 STRAP AND E3LKG HI 54-IEATW ENTIRE FACE OF ILI4LL W/ S44EAli4LL PER PLAN OpE LKCi W1 LTP4 W 0/C /-3X TO EXISTING 2X SILL PLATE I A'44 T0 FP-øIi'(. Lud J 54-IEARJJALL S r' PER PLAN 1' SILL PLATE BLOCKING DETAIL DAILY Job Name: Location: 23/9 Plo P/CO Pit., c1s Contractor: Field Technician: Equipment Working: Test No. Test Location Elevation or Depth V1,51 7-60 J08 Y/T 7-4 9016 011ti4 FoQ OM 7/041$ , __ jç 77',tiçc REPt 04 TIED iB J4') ___ P0OT/,LhcS ItIO .7: /-;?o 776 ___ FIELD REPORT No: - Project No.: Date: /0-,' - Weather: 5i,tW/ Day: 7;I1(1b Forernqn:\ Miles: j Hours: Inspection / Testing of 13olz-ollueq ae,i4j77/O1) Soil rype Optimum Moisture Field Moisture Maximum Density Field Density t/iw: i'. V,'9- 7/1. E 5-c'it 5 7A Ci02 716 ,fr;7;41loS O' OOC) 41t42 J;4~kC- £1 /27A4) is'aE3 0/1 J/7,\)s TO 4cjtx ONCIIeJT5. U /f1'-c2O Summary of Operations: Supervisor : . Engineer; . . Geologist: Todays Yardage: I Yardage to Date: 100* (4.77) DAILY FIELD REPORT No: / )ob 'ame: 27.J, Project No.: 14t D ate :8.o(.) Locations piaP,cooi.11 Weather: oiIA64cA r Day; i'2i Contractor: C4'24/,Q 00,Q7. Foreman: o9 Field Technician: 17, 8.6.2O Miles: Hours: Equipment Working: Inspection / Testing of &6. 4ra11 Test No. Test Location Elevation or Depth Soil Type Optimum Moisture Field Moisture Maximum Density Field Density Rel. Comp. 5)r 5)re 1,1111 4'i ôse s'' Tir 71w- 5u&,am ,4 T0UA)0S4 TICA-IS 41.4 5E64) Di 4 7iQ TNi f OC /4 401011,I / / 4cc00,xr 1.iin oc soo ,c 1 é'O'ZT V 3 JAJ,i OOj 71I. 4 ,2P40ti' rn'i-o, A-",-41V5 0, /41/o't'?7eo ,co -Mr ,u-5ralelole 22? CwciZe75 5 Sc. L66izjJ 5WAa B 71m ,%Tloo-) SI c uO4 Ti A) 5/1.4 10/.5TC-/ a. Summary of Operations: Supervisor; Engineer: Geologist: Todays Yardage: Yardage to Dote: It&IiI?ii!iii'CCI,IlfJ, !IIC 00* (4.77) I] EsGil Corporation In Partnership with Government for Bui11ing Safety DATE: 06/08/00 LIR JURISDICTION: Carlsbad 0 PLAN REVIEWER 0 FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 99-4162 SET: III PROJECT ADDRESS: 2319 Pio Pica Drive PROJECT NAME: SFD/Garage for Moore Residence The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS: 1) On sheet 4 of City's Set note all steel to be turned down into footings 12" as noted in red on owners set. By: Ray Fuller Enclosures: LOG Esgil Corporation LI GA LI MB [] EJ LI PC 06/08/00 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858)560-1576 EsGil Corporation 2ñ Partnership with Government for fBui&uing Safety DATE: 05/10/00 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 99-4162 PROJECT ADDRESS: 2319 Pio Pico Drive SET: II O APPLICANT 'rt1TREVIEWER 0 FILE PROJECT NAME: SFD/Garage for Moore. Residence The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes.. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. - The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Bob Carlin 1639 Grand Avenue San Marcos, Ca. 92069 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Bob Carlin (V.M.) Telephone #: (760) 591-0442 (by: e: Fax #: Mail --,' Telephone Fax In Person LI REMARKS: By: Ray Fuller Enclosures: Esgil Corporation LGA EMB flEJ EPC 05/02/00 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576 13 I Carlsbad 99-4162 II 05/10/00 RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 2319 Pio Pico Drive DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 05/02/00 REVIEWED BY: Ray Fuller FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): PLAN CHECK NO.: 99-4162 SET: II DATE RECHECK COMPLETED: 05/10/00 This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews. The original correction number has been given for your reference. In case you did not keep a copy of the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding corrections. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? DYes DNo ? Carlsbad 99-4162 II 05/10/00 The items listed below are from the previous list. These remaining items have not been adequately addressed. The remarks in bold are to emphasize the remaining problem. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92009, (760) 438- 1161. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 2. Plans, specifications and calculations shall be signed and sealed by the California state licensed engineer or architect responsible for their preparation, for plans deviating from conventional wood frame construction. Final Sets. The soils report on page 4 has stated that slab reinforcing is to be turned down into footings.. In Seismic Zone 4, each site shall be assigned a. near-source factor. Identify this value in the soils report and on the plans. Section 1629.4.2.. The soils report has stated that the Na factor is 1.2 and 1.0 was uses in calculations To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly. describe them and where they are located in the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: Yes U No. U The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Ray Fuller at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. EsGil Corporation In Partnership with government for Building Safety DATE: 11/17/99 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad U U JURIS. U PLAN REVIEWER U FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 99.4162 SET: I PROJECT ADDRESS: 2319 Plo Pico Drive PROJECT NAME: SFD/Garage for Moore Residence The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. LI The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Bob Carlin 1639 Grand Avenue San Marcos, Ca. 92069 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant( except by mail) that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted (by: ) Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS: By: Ray Fuller Enclosures: Esgil Corporation F-1 GA MB DEJ F1 PC 11/08/99 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad 99-4162 11/17/99 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES PLAN CHECK NO.: 99-4162 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 2319 Pio Pico Drive FLOOR AREA: STORIES: 2 Dwelling 1736 Garage! Workshop 694 HEIGHT: 26 Deck 119 REMARKS: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: ESGIL CORPORATION: 11/08/99 DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW PLAN REVIEWER: Ray Fuller COMPLETED: 11/17/99 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Present California law mandates that residential construction comply with the 1998 edition of the California Building Code (Title 24), which adopts the following model codes: 1997 UBC, 1997 UPC, 1997 UMC and 1996 NEC (all effective 7/1/99). The above regulations apply to residential construction, regardless of the code editions adopted by ordinance. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet number, specification section. etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92009, (760) 438-1161. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 56071468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 2. Plans, specifications and calculations shall be signed and sealed by the California state licensed engineer or architect responsible for their preparation, for plans deviating from conventional wood frame construction. Spcify expiration date of license. (California Business and Professions Code). Clearly dimension building setbacks from property lines at both sidle yards. Section 106.3.3. . GENERAL RESIDENTIAL REQUIREMENTS Glazing in the following locations should be of safety glazing material in accordance with Section 2406.4 (see exceptions): a) Fixed or operable panels adjacent to a door where the nearest exposed edge of the glazing is within a 24-inch arc of either vertical, edge of the door in a closed position and where the bottom exposed edge of the glazing is less than 60 inches above the walking surface. Window 15 at balcony on page 2 and window 8 at workshop or note 24" distance. . EXITS, STAIRWAYS, AND RAILINGS The walls and soffits of the enclosed usable space under interior stairs shall be protected on the enclosedside as required for one hour fire-resistive construction. Section 1003.3.3.9. . Carlsbad 99-4162 11/17/99 . ROOFING Show the required ventilation for attics . The minimum vent area is 1/150 of attic area (or 1/300 of attic area if at least 50% of the required vent is at least 3 feet above eave vents or cornice vents). Provide calculations to show area required and area provided. Section 1505.3. . GARAGE Specify how obtaining 1 hour protection at garage where trusses shown at 24" oc. Table 3-13, Section 302.4. . FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS Provide a copy of the project soil report prepared by a California licnsed architect or civil engineer. The report shall include foundation desig recommendations based on the engineer's findings and shall comply with UBC Section 1804. Report submitted is wrong APN and address. Also report expired after 14 OCT. 99 In Seismic Zone 4, each site shall be assigned a near-source facto. Identify this value in the soils report and on the plans. Section 1629.4.2. 1 Investigate the potential for seismically induced soil liquefaction and soil instability in Seismic Zones 3 and 4. Section 1804.5 Note on the plan the soils classification, whether or not the soil is expansive and note the allowable bearing value. Section 106.3.3. I If correct soils report is similar then The foundation plan does noticomply with the soils report recommendations for this project. Please review the report and modify design, notes and details as required to show compliance: 24" depth, note requirements for transition over cut and fill per page 4, show 7i ft daylight on Section AA page 6 and slab rebar to be bend down to a depth of 3' from bottom. Provide a minimum of 4" of sand with Visqueen sandwiched in between. The soils engineer recommended that he/she review the foundation excavations. Note on the foundation plan that "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building Department foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the building official in writing that: The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report, The utility trenches have been properly backfihled and compacted, and The foundation excavations, the soils expansive characteristics and bearing capacity conform to the soils report." Carlsbad 99-4162 11/17/99 14. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soils report are properly incorporated into the construction documents (when required by the soil report). 15. Show distance from foundation to edge of cut or fill slopes ("distance-to- daylight") and show slope and heights of cuts and fills. Chapter 18. 16. Note on plans that surface water will drain away from building and show drainage pattern. Section 1804.7. 17. Complete detail bubble on section AA on page 6. Bedroom 2 needs to note maximum height of retained earth. FRAMING 18. Specify truss identification numbers on the plans. The letters provided on page 4 do not seem to match truss calculations. 19. Per UBC Section 2321.4, provide the following note on the plans if trusses are used: "Each truss shall be legibly branded, marked or otherwise have permanently affixed thereto the following information located within 2 feet of the center of the span on the face of the bottom chord: Identity of the company manufacturing the truss. The design load. The spacing of the trusses." 20. In Seismic Zone 4, aspect ratios are limited to 2:1 for wood shear panels. Table 23-11-G. The minimum width for 1st floor is 5 ft and the 2nd is 4 ft. If using pier method must be designed, detailed and reference to plans. 21. Missing line D (16 'of shear I on page 4 22. Individual concrete or masonry piers shall project at least 8 inches above exposed ground unless the columns or posts which they support are of approved wood of natural resistance to decay or treated wood is used. Detail 15 on page 9 shows 6". Section 2306.5. 23. Note on the plans that an A.I.T.C. Certificate of Compliance for glued laminated wood members shall be given to the building inspector prior to installation. Section 2304. Carlsbad 99-4162 11/17/99 . MECHANICAL (UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE) Note that passageway to the attic furnace shall be unobstructed not less than 30" high and 30" wide and have continuous solid flooring not less than 24 inches wide, not more than 20 feet in length through the attic. Section 307.3.2, UMC. . ELECTRICAL (NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE) Show on the plan the amperage of the electrical service, the location of the service panel and the location of any sub-panels. Note on the plans that bathroom receptacle outlets shall be supplied by a minimum of one 20-ampere branch circuit. Such circuits shall have no other outlets. This circuit may serve more than one bathroom. NEC Art. 210-52(d). Show on the plans a wall receptacle adjacent to each lavatory in the bathroom. NEC Art. 210-52(d). Power room on page 10. . CITY OF CARLSBAD REQUIREMENTS New residential units must be pre-plumbed for future solar water heating. Note that two roof jacks must be installed where the water heater is in the one story garage and directly below the most south facing roof (City Ordinance No. 8093). Note that two 3/4" copper pipes must be installed to the most convenient future solar panel location when the water heater is not in a one story garage and is not directly below the most south facing roof. (City Ordinance No. 8093). All piping for present or future solar water heating must be insulated when in areas that are not heated or cooled by mechanical means (city policy). Incorporate the waterproofing details, on the attached Policy 80-8, where interior living space occurs below grade at the masonry wall(s). To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: Yes IJ No LI The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Ray Fuller at Esgil Corporation. Thank V P,5LICIES1AND' !UM:R '80-8 SUBJECT: O - N WATERPRO0FINGkBELOW GRADE EFFECTIVE: 9/23/80 SECTION: BUILDING DEPARTMENT SUPERSEDES: URPOSE: TO ESTABLISH A UNIFORM POLICY FOR WATERPROOFING BELOW GRADE MASONRY WALLS. 0LICY: The Building Department requires approval in advahce of any method of waterproofing below grade masonry walls except the one shown below. THE FOLLOWING METHODS ARE APPROVED. 1. Three layers hot niop and felt. Johns-Manvillemetrane waterproo U.S.G. "Supertite" system Thoroseal Flintkote "Yellow Jacket". NMI 51 BARR _ "IN -•••= SZ = - GRADE \\\•=\ 1/2" GRAVEl. 4• DRAIN I (PERFORATE OPEN JOI C RAIN PIPE SHALL SL TO FINISHED GRADE 18' PER FOOT MU nitiated By: Approved By: Carlsbad THE INFORMATION LISTED BELOW MUST BE SHOWN ON THE TITLE SHEET OF THE PLANS SITE ADDRESS . LEGAL DESCRIPTION ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER PROPERTY OWNER DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF WORK QUANTITY OF GRADING IN CUBIC YARDS CONTACT PERSON - NAME AND DAYTIME PHONE NUMBER BELOW, PLEASE CIRCLE ANY PLANNING COMMISSION OR CITY COUNCIL ACTION ON THIS PROPERTY: VARIANCE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TRACT OR PARCEL MAP PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REDEVELOPMENT PERMIT SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN SPECIFIC PLAN PLAN CHECK NUMBER 2075 Las Palmas Dr. - Carlsbad, CA.92009-1576. (619) 438-1161 • FAX (619) 438-0894 -i- Carlsbad 99-4162 11/17/99 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 99-4162 PREPARED BY: Ray Fuller DATE: 11/17/99 BUILDING ADDRESS: 2319 Pio Pico Drive BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R3 Ui TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN BUILDING PORTION BUILDING AREA (ft.2) VALUATION MULTIPLIER VALUE ($) Dwelling 1736 PER CITY EST. 159,906 Garage/Workshop 694 Deck 119 Air Conditioning TOTAL VALUE Fire Sprinklers T159,906 E 199 UBC Building Permit Fee Bldg. Permit Fee by ordinance: $ 831.08 199 UBC Plan Check Fee Plan Check Fee by ordinance: $ 540.20 Type of Review: El Complete Review Structural Only LII Hourly LI Repetitive Fee Applicable R Other: Esgil Plan Review Fee: $ 432.16 Comments: 94 UBC$1187.25 x 70% $831.08 x 52% $432.16 Plan check fee $831.08 x 65% = $540.20 Sheet I of 1 macvalue.doc 5196 F 4 Citv of Carlsba4 Public Works - Engineering BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST DATE: II I I / PLANCHECK NO.: CB 9 BUILDING ADDRESS: -3 19 V Pla-o PROJECT DESCRIPTION: /sJ.-,t) £6 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER LT(' - 3 D - o EST. VALUE: 1-ç9 9b (, ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to build. LA Right-of-Way permit is required prior to construction of the following improvements: DENIAL Please see,A attached report of deficiencies marked wit ID.)&1ake necessary corrections to plans or specificattns for compliance with applicable codes and standard. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to to office for review. B:' /Cl Date: By: Date: By: Date: LY E EERING AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE BUILDING PERMIT: By: Li Dedication Application Li Dedication Checklist Li Improvement Application LI Improvement Checklist LI Future Improvement Agreement Li Grading Permit Application Li Grading Submittal Checklist LI Right-of-Way Permit Application Date: ENGINEERING DEPT. CONTACT PERSON Name: KATHLEEN M. FARMER City of Carlsbad Address: 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 Phone: (619)438-1161, ext. 4374 CFD INFORMATION Parcel Map No: Lots: Recordation: Li Right-of-Way Permit Submittal Checklist Carlsbad Tract: and Information Sheet Li Sewer Fee Information Sheet A-4 576 • (760) 438-1161 • FAX (760) 431-5769 DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE 60 Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of approval for BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST SITE PLAN 1STV 2' 3R0/ 1. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: -A. _North Arrow . Property Lines Bxisting & Proposed Structures E--Easements Existing Street Improvements F. Right-of-Way Width & Adjacent Streets 'Driveway widths 11 U 2. Show on site plan: A. Drainage Patterns Building pad surface drainage must maintain a minimum slope of one percent towards an adjoining street or an approved drainage course. ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE: "Finish grade will provide a minimum positive drainage of 2% to swale 5' away from building." B. Existing & Proposed Slopes and Topography 3. Include on title sheet: Site address Assessor's Parcel Number Legal Description For commercial/industrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, include: total building square footage with the square footage for each different us e , existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing, warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved. EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION U U 4b. All conditions are in compliance. Date: ASPALMASSYSUJBRARYENG\WORO\DOCS\CHKt.ST\8uiIthng PIanthecc Cklst BP000I Form KF.doc Rev. 9/3/97 BUILDING PLANCHEK CHECKLIST / 2 ' 3RDI DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS ,/ 5. Dedication for all street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the building site and any storm / drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and for remodels with a value at or exceeding $/0, L1O , pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.030. Dedication required as follows: ct.ai /o' Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8 1/2" x 11" plat map and submit with a title report. All easement documents must be approved and signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process. Submit the completed application form with the required checklist items and fees to the Engineering Department in person. Applications will not be accept by mail or fax. Dedication completed by: Date: IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS 6a. All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the construction exceeds $ _O un) , pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.040. Public improvements required as follows: -C.4J)LQ cLbLeL4T--&, liz.. ç Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public improvement requirements. A registered Civil Engineer must prepare the appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements on the attached checklist to the Engineering Department through a separate plan check process. The completed application form and the requirements on the checklist must be submitted in person Applications by mail or fax are not accepted. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of building permit. Improvement Plans signed by: Date: 6b. Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title report or current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $_-9O. 0-V so we may prepare the necessary Future Improvement Agreement. This agreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the City'prior to issuance of a Building permit. Future public improvements required as follows: Planthecic Ckist BP0001 Form KF.CjOC Rev. 9/3/97 BUILDING PNCHECK CHECKLIST ndI 3rdl U U U 6c. Enclosed please find your Future Improvement Agreement. Please return agreement signed and notarized to the Engineering Department. Future Improvement Agreement completed by: Date: U U U 6d. No Public Improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or defective improvements found adiacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction of the City Inspector prior to occupancy. GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS The conditions that invoke -the need for a grading permit are found in Section 11.06.030 of the Municipal Code. U U 7a. Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading requirements. Include accurate grading quantities (cut, fill import, export). U U U 7b. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer must be submitted together with the completed application form attached. NOTE: The Grading Permit must be issued and rough grading approval obtained prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Grading Inspector sign off by: Date: U U U 7c. Graded Pad Certification required. (Note: Pad certification may be required even if a grading permit is not required.) U 7d. No Grading Permit required. U U U 7e. If grading is not required, write "No Grading" on plot plan. MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS U 8. A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-Way and/or private work adjacent to the public Right-of-Way. Types of work include, but are not limited to: street improvements, tree trimming, driveway construction, tieing into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities. Right-of-Way permit required for: \\ASPALMAS\SYS\LIBRARYENG\WORD\DOCS\CHKLSVBuiCTh9 Planthecj, Cklst BP0001 Form KF.doc Rev. 9/3/97 F_ I BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1stl 2rdt 3rd./ Li Li Li 9. A SEWER PERMIT is required concurrent with the building permit issuance. The fee is noted in the fees section on the following page. Li Li Li 10. INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT If your facility is located in the City of Carlsbad sewer service area, you need to contact the Carlsbad Municipal Water District, located at 5950 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008. District personnel can provide forms and assistance, and will check to see if your business enterprise is on the EWA Exempt List. You may telephone (760) 438-2722, extension 153, for assistance. Industrial Waste permit accepted by: Date: Li Li Li 11.NPDES PERMIT Complies with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant shall provide best management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever occurs first. c-5e fees are attached Li No fees required 0 Local Facilities Management. Zone Transportation Fee Agmt Signed. Additional Comments: H:\WORDDOCS\CHK1S'T\BuiIding Pancl,eck Mist BP0001 Form KF.doc . 5 Rev. 9/3/97 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET Estimate based on unconfirmed information from applicant, a C. Calculation based on building plancheck plan submittal. Address: a 1G) C Bldg. Permit NcM2 9- Y& Prepared by: by:)14'IJ Date: L/ / i,Jro Checked by Date: EDU CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses. Types of Use: <Z f> 0 Sq. FtO j_-"2 I EDU's: Types of Use: Sq. Ft./Units: EDU's: ADT CALCULATIONS: List types and square foota es for all uses. Types of Use: Sq. I ADT's: Types of Use: Sq. Ft./Units: ADT's: FEES REQUIRED: WITHIN CFD: 0 YES (no bridge & thoroughfare fee in District #1, reduced Traffic Impact Fee) 0 NO 0 1. PARK-IN-LIEU FEE PARK AREA & #: FEE/UNIT: X NO. UNITS: = $____________ 0 2. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ADT's/UNITS: X FEE/ADT: .=$ ZONE TRANSPORTATION ADT'S X $10 0 3. BRIDGE AND THOROUGHFARE FEE (DIST. #1 DIST. #2 DIST. #3 ADT's/UNITS: X FEE/ADT:________ =$ .— 4. FACILITIES MANAGEMENT FEE ZONE:_________ UNITISQ.FT.: X FEE/SQ.FT./UNIT:________ 5. SEWER FEE PERMIT No. EDU's: X FEE/EDU: /'57 = / BENEFIT AREA: DRAINAGE BASIN: - EDU's: X FEE/EDU: 6. SEWER LATERAL ($2,500) = $_____________ 7. DRAINAGE FEES PLDA _: HIGH -/LOW / t/A 0 9 $ ACRES: X F TOTAL OF_ ABOVE FEES*: $ _2- . I *NOTE: This calculation sheet is NOT a complete list of all fees which may be due. Dedications and Improvements may also be required with Building Permits. oc,, •a Inn Inn fl7 ri El H PLANNING DEPARTMENT BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST Pizan rkk Mn r cR/ ,21Z P"elc, / Planner ///("4.- Phone (619) 438-1161, extension Type of Project & Use:'S9 Net Project Density: DU/AC Zoning :jZ General Plan: -fr1 Facilities Management Zone: / CFD tinlns,tl #---- Date of participation: — Remaining net dev acres.:_____ Circle One (For non-residential development: Type of land used created by this permit: Legend: Item Complete (Z~Item Incomplete - Needs your action Environmental Review Required: YES NO TYPE DATE OF COMPLETION: Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: Discretionary Action Required: YES V. NO TYPE ( APPROVAL/RESO.NO. _ PROJECT NO. OTHER RELATED CASES: Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions oj Approval: 2 I T Coastal Zone Assessmeni/Compliance Project site located in Coastal Zone? YES____ NO CA Coastal Commission Authority? YES NO)( If California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact them at - 3111 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 200, San Diego CA 92108-1725; (619) 521-8036 _ I Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt): (XIc- Coastal Perrriii Determination, Form already completed? YES____ If NO, complete Coastal Permit Determination Form now. Coastal Permit Determination Log #: Follow-Up Actions: Stamp Building Plans as "Exempt" or "Coastal Permit Required" (at minimum Floor Plans). Complete Coastal Permit Determination Log as needed. 1 I11E1 fl Inclusionary Housing Fee required: YES) NO (Effective date of Inclusionary Housing Ordinance - May 21, 1993.) Data Entry Completed? YES _ NO ____ (A/P/Ds, Activity Maintenance, enter CB#. toolbar, Screens. Housing Fees, Construct Housing V/N, Enter Fee, UPDATE!) Site Plan: Provide a fully dimensional site plan drawn to scale. S h o w : N o r t h a r r o w , property lines, easements, ,existing and proposed structures , s t r e e t s , e x i s t i n g street improvements, right-of-way width; dimensional setba c k s a n d e x i s t i n g topographical lines. Provide legal description of property and assessor's parcel n u m b e r . Th E Zoning: Setbacks:' Front: Required Shown Interior Side: Required Shown Street Side: Required Shown Rear: Required 7 Shown e7lt Accessory structure setbacks: ( ' Front: Required Shown Interior Side: , Required , Shown Street Side: Required Shown Rear: Required Shown Structure separation: Required Shown Lot Coverage: Required Swn - Height: 'Required ' Shown ffS Parking: - Spaces Required Shown Guest Spaces Required Shown Additional Comments OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO DATE el;-11)0 _RPR 26 02:35PM BANKERS HILL IES Apv,_9 Jn Tiolego 760 129.7580 P.2 P.02 _____ Euhiecrhqj, Inc. CIVIL, EO7!tH4... QUALITY RNMEM WO FGU770N ORION ItP.Y!11NG • SL TFRTW.de M6PfCflON CLIENT: TAU.MAN : PROJECT: TAL 898. DATE: 14 OCT. 1998 MR. JEFF TALLP4A 2946 State Street, Suite .0 S Carlsbad, CA. 92008 . Subject: Re8ulta of Compaction Testing and Inspection for the. lot located' at.2335 Pio'PlCo Drive, Carlsbad, CA. (APN: 156-350-08). Dear Mr. Tallman: Pursuant to your -request, we have completed our Inspection and Compaction Testing of the rough grading operations for the subject parcel. Locations of our Fie1d Density Tests are shown on Enclosure (1), and the results of these tests are detailed on Enclosure (2). Site preparation, compaction, and testing were accomplished between August 27 and September 4, .1998. Based on our observations and testing, It Is our opinion that the work performed during that period was In general conformance with our Preliminary Geotachnical Investigation dated 27 June 1998 and the City of Caralbad Grading Ordinance. On August 27, 1998, grading began on the subject lot-with the contractor removing some trees,, the existing concrete, slabs and retaining wafle,, and-the surface vegetation in the area to. be graded for the driveway and house pads All debris was removed from the proposed grading area. On this date, the contractor excavated the loose surface soils. In the area of the,conqrsta removal along the easterly side iBIlA $0, .MELROSE DRIVE #285, VISTA, CA 92093 .. 760.945-3150 • JAPR 26 '99 02:36P11 BANKERS HILL PROPERTIES P.3 Apr-- u.:iv ,.uner1nFWmeLfl. nQiegO 760 729 7580 P03 Inc. OM. dEOTECAOCAL I atMu?VCER1 FClINOATfId OSSGN • LAND gUqvlv,r4D • 8efg. 7E$1IND CCW$TRUC7V.'4 MN4AGENEW!I MSPC7N of the lot by removing approximately 2 to 3 feet of loose materials. These soils were stockpiled In the , center portion of the lot. The contractor then replac.d'ar,d recompacted these stockpiled soils on the easterly side of the housepad. FlU materials consisting Of native silty sands were placed in thin lifts, watered as necessary, and compacted utilizing a 1-973 trackloader and a 0-4-bulldozer. Upon reaching the design finished grade, the contractor over- excavated and recompacted the upper 3 feet of the surface soils for the house..pad to create aunlrQrm fill blanket and to help eliminate the effeetsof differential settlement, As indicated by our Compaction Teat Results, Enclosure (2)., density teats performed In the fill materials for the driveway, rear yard, and the main house pad Indicated over 90% relative compaction ascompared toASTM Test Procedure D 1557-91. In general, the native materials exposed at surface grades were considered to have a moderate expansion potential according our tet results of our Preliminary Soils Investigation, Foundations shall be sized and constructed in accordance with the recommendations, found in the letter part of this report. For foundation design purposeè, an allowable bearing strength of .1450 pef may be utlllzed for all continuous or spread footings founded In dense native soile or compacted fill soils compacted to over 90% relative compaction per ASTM 0' 1557-91. It Is recommended that the continuous perimeter foindations and concrete slabs fora light weight, wood framed, stucco type structurfi shall be constructed and reinforced in accordance with the following minimum design criteria: -2- 1611-A SO, MELROSE DRIVE #285, VISTA, CA 92083 -,760-045-3150 • FAX: 760-9454221 __APR 26 '99 02:36pM BANKERS HILL PROPERTIES Apr-22-3Y vasbflo mmr1c&nn0MQLn8 anDiego, 760 729 7580 " P.04 1141 .Im. c,a. oor g QUALITY £NomEe*v 7rcn, cø.mmLnaN MAM*3EM!NTA IW9T1 The 'continuous perimeter foundations shall extend a minimum depth-of 24 inches and a minimum width of 15 inches* Into firm native or compacted fill soils for a two story structure. For a single story structure the foundations shall extend a minimum depth of 18 Inches' and a mlnlmumwidth of .12 inches. The, depth of the foundations shall be measured from the lowest adjacent grade. The continuous foundations shall be reinforced with at. least four No. 4 steel bars, two bars shall be placed 3 Inches from the top of the foundation and the other bars shall be placed 3 inches from the. bottom. AS an alternative to the No 4 rebare, one No. 5 steel rebar top and bottom may be used. Footings which span from native material to compacted .f 111. soils, where applicable, shall be reinforced with an additional one No. 5 'steel bar top and bottom to control potential differential movement extended 10 feet oh either side' of the daylight line. ' q. Footings placed on or adjacent to,f Ill elopes shall have a minimum horizontal distance of. seven feet. (7') from the bottom edge of the fâotings tb the face of the slope. d. All Interior concrete slabs shall be a minimum of four inches in thickness and shall be reinforced with a minimum of No. 3 rebars placed at 18 inches on center both ways and placed In the center f the.slab. The bars shall' be bent downward into the perimeter footiflgs at 18 Inches on center to a depth of 3 inches from the bottom. In order to minimize vapor transmission, an Impermeable membrane (is: vlsqueen) shall be placed over 2 Inches of clean, poorly graded, coarse sand, decomposed' granite, 'or crushed rock.: The membrane 'shall 'be covered with 2 inches of sand to protect It during construction and' the sand -should be lightly moistened just prior to placing concrete. All concrete used' on 1611-A-80, MELROSE DRIVE #288 V1$74, CA 91093. 760446.3160 • 4X 780445.4221 PPR 26 '99 :37pM BHKERS HILL PROPERTIES P.5 'Apr-22-99 03:58P NnerlcanhlomeLns anDieg 760 729 7580 P.05 ____II&ItInec,IuijIne cMi. OPTCIL, a uA&,rP rDrN1JN FOU4flONDEJ4 • LAHO 9URM#M • SOIL 7W91 COM1TOflO?&*NACEeIENTI tN5PEDflQPd this project shall have, a minimum compres1vG strength of 2500 pat unless Otherwise increased- on the Building Plans. These foundation recommendations are minimum design requirements for the. finish grade soil conditions; however, actual foundations shall be designed by the Structural Engineer for the expected live, and dead loads, and for wind and seismic loads. Findl.nge of this-Report are valid as of this date;,however, changes In conditions of a property can occur with passage of time, whether they be due to natural Process or works of man on this or adjacent properties. In addition, changes in applicable or appropriate standards occur whether 'they result from legislation or broadening of knowledge. Accordingly, findings of 'this Report may be Invalidated wholly or partIally by changes outside our. control. 'Therefore,' this Report is subject to review and should not be relied upon after a period of one year. In the event that any changes In the nature, design., or location of buildings are planned, the conclusions and recommendations contained in this Report shall not be considered valid, unless the changes are reviewed and the conclusions of this RepOrt are modified or vérif led In writing. Th1,s'Report is issued with the .uñderstanding:that'it is the responsibility of the owner or of hie',epraaentat1ve to ensure that the Information and recommendations contained her1n are called to the attention of the' project Architect and Engineer and are Incorporated Into the plans. Further, the necessary steps shall be,taken to ensure that the contractor and subcontractors carry out such recommendations In the field.. ' 1811-A 5O MELROSE OR1vEwa85 VISTA, CA 92083 • 760-9453150 ''FAX 760-945-4221 Sincerely, rt~Urc..Beard RCE RGE Chief Engineer APR 26 '99 02:37Pt1 BANKERS HILL PROPERTIES Apr-22-99 03:58P AmerlcaflHOmeLns sanolego 760 729 7b$O P.6 P.06 lkliftollwallog, Inc. CML GEDTECNcA1. OUAUTY NNFFN FOU4110E&lN • &.4ø 5VnVUVM v8W 1!817N CN87CTTOM M1lAoiwi? & INSPEC74W It Is recommended that the Soil Engineer be provided the opportunity for a general review of the final design plans and specifications for this project in order that the recommendations of this report may be properly Interpreted and implemented in the design. It is also recommended that the Soil. Engineer be provided the opportunity to verify the foundation and slab construction in the field prior to placing concrete. (If the Soil Engineer is not accorded the privilege of making these reviews, he can assume no responsibility for misinterpretation of his recommendations). The Soil EngineOr has prepared this Report for the exclusive use of, the client and authorized agents. This Report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted soil and foundation en91neerin9 practices. No other. warranties, either expressed or implied, are made as to the professional advice provided under the terms of this agreement, and Included In the Report. B & B Engineering Inc. and Associates appreciate this opportunity to be of service. Should you hava any questions regarding this. project, please do not hesitate to contact us. 1611-A SO. MELROSE DRIVE 085 VISTA, CA-02093 .. 760.9454150 0 FAX: 760.946.4221 APR 26 '99 :37pf BANKERS HILL PROPERTIES Apr22-99 03:59P ner1canPIQmInb jci,nie90 780 729 7580 P.? P.07 It 0 APPROXXMATE. LOCATION OF PIELD -DENSITY TESTS PLOT PAN OWNER: fr1.. Ki~ 114111affliremIflfbIllC. LOCATION; 33 FO PICO 17m,' a.—.CAlUS13A0, COQ , .. . 8FRLW4l. ENrf • LANZURY1I1#O PERCOLATION A soz. 7T1NQ A. P • N • - — 350 - 08 • PROJECT: 746 9S DATE: ENCLOSURE (1) APR 26 '99 02:38PM BANKERS HILL PROPERTIES Apr-22-99 03;9P AmerlcaflhlomeLfls dian0lego 760 729 7580 P.8 • CLIENT' 774V ..... II&II IJngIiiccru'U, i,gc cjvit, CCOThC$NICA(. £ OU.UTY F?QJM&R$ $TAI1CJSAI.IN5IMEFR'N • LA4D5UVEYHO . PERCO *flON&SOJ. TPsrwG • PMECT.- 746 f98 CATE: I per Test No. Test Date Test I.o;atlon •• Test El/Depth Soil Type Dr.Densi11.20 Moisture,S Relative Compaction. Retest No. - Field Mfini Field Opt.: L2± . I., • j 1/ _______ 9, ' 2Z1 .•'• fl' ?L?.. £. -- do _.Z___2L._...... _ L... 6) AR _." _ S Jo " 'I f I, ja,g • 7.ç _____ _______ _____ 1 -• . . iEL .• _____________ OPTIMUM 14AXXZ4UM DRY MOISTURE % DENSITY (pcf) COMPACTION CURVEDATA - -• • 0 • SOIL_ AND DESCRIPTION • -,74 Al- &QOkbt/i/7fr_4,iD .CQMPACTfOiV TEST DATA • S • ENCLOSURE MAY 7 '99 1121AM BANKERS HILL PROPERTIES P.2 Myuo- u:.&i- Amer 1canHomeLns SanDlego 760 729 7580 P.02 B& It 1nt. CIVIL, OOYEOhj, 8 QUAUTY EIVtMINO . •• PVATIOWOUIN. 44P 8,JVE1NG • 1CI. TI978 CodSTUCflO$ M4NAUMFNT& IN$FEGTSON The. equivalent fluid pressures are obtained by the formulas: Active Pressure; z Ka 1 = 0.57 x .122.0 =. 70 pcf Passive Pressure: 2 Kp 9 = 1.76 x 122.0 215 pcf I Pressure at Root: z K0 8 = 0,72 X122.0 88 pcf Applicable where 79 aoi,l. wet. density (122.0 pcf'), 0= 16°, and z : (depth and width of footing) z 1.0'. A coefficient of friction of 0.36 may be used for design of concrete on the native soils. RETAI.1NG WALL . Afl equivalent fluid pressure Of thirty (30) pounds per cubic foot may be used for design of retaining walls. This figure is based on a drained condition and use of level granular backfill. If the existing native soils are used as backfill, the equivalent fluid pressure will be 70 pounds per cubic foot. For 1.5:1 (horizontal to vertical) sloping backfill, an active pressure equivalent to that exerted by a fluid weighing 90 pcf should be assumed. If exoavatlons pre .made by sloping or over-cutting, 'itwill be necessary to place backfill behind the retaining walls after completion of tl1e structure. Backfill soil should be granular In nature and froe 1of orgai1c matter and debris. All backfil,l should be placed after Inspection has been made of the bottom of the excavation and the installation of the -8- 1611.A .80. MELROSE DRIVE #285, VISTA, CA 92083 • 780-945.3150 • FAX: 760-945.4221 M i MAY 07 '99 11:21AM BANKERS HILL PROPERTIES P.3 760 729 7580 P.03 (Tfl' B&B IhqJh1eer1ufj, Itie. \ CIViL. CEO ?ECHAL 8 OUAUVN¼ER1NQ FO1#40A770.V OEaIO,4 , LAND SUPVF ViNO • SOIL 7ESTV4G CCNtIiCION MAM4OE4Nt a ,?4S,ECflCN eubdraln behind the wall. Form lumber and other debris shall not be permitted at the base of the backfill. All backfill should be compacted to 90% of the Laboratory Standard. In some areas where the walls approach the excavated embankment, it may prove economical to place gravel rather than soil for backfill. The Bnalysle and recommendations submitted in this Report are based in part upon the data obtained from the test pit excavations perfçrmed on the site and our experience and judgement. The nature and extent of variations between the test pits may, not become evident until. construction. If variations then appear evident, it will be necessary to re-evaluate the recommendations of this, Report. Findings of'the Report are valid aa.of this date; however, changes In conditions of a property can occur with passage of time whether they be due to natural process or works of man on this or adjacent propfrtles. In addition, changes in applicable or appropriate standards occur whether they result from legislation pr broadening ofkn9wledge Accordingly, findings of this Report may be invalidated wholly or partially by changes outside our control. Therefore, this Report is subject to review and should noç be relied upon after a period of one year. In the event that any changes in the nature, design or locations of'buildings are planned, the conclusions and recommendations contained in this Report shell not be considered valid unless the changes are reviewed and conclusions of this Report modified or verified in writing. -9- 16-ASO. MEL.ROSG DRIVE #285, VISTA, CA 92083 • 760.945-3150 • FAX: 76O-94S422, MAY B7 '99 11:22cM BANKERS HILL PROPERTIES P.4 May-u-ww u:'iii ,meri,canrIomaIflS ianD1ego 760 729 .7580 P.04 ('IJ&ItEughu,erIlifI,I1w \ CIVIL. REMOPOSCAL. & ØVALITV £NOINEJNQ FOUNbTICNDEWGM • &AAe V1NG • 101L TWRTINO CO.'437WV1ON MANAEMENT 6 IN9PEO71Cr4 This Report Is issued with the understanding that it Is the responsibility of th9 owner, or of his representative, to ensure that the i pformation and recommendations Contained herein are called to the atten,t.in of the Architect and Engineer for the project and incorporated into the plans and that the necessary steps are taken to see that the contractor and. subcontractors carry out such recommendations ih the -field. The Soil Engineer has prepared this Report for the exclusive use of the client and authorized agents. This Report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted soil and foundation engineering practices. No other warranties either expressed or implied are made as to the professional advice provided under the terms of this agreement, and Included in the Report. It is recommended that the Soil Engineer be provided the opportunity for a general review of the final design and specifications In order that earthwork and foundation recommendations may be properly Interpreted and Implemented in the design and sPeciricatiOna. (If the Soil Eng1ner is not accorded the privilege of making this recommended review s he can assume no responsibility for misinterpretation of his recommendations). B 4 8 Engineering, Inc. appreciate this opportunity to be of service. Should you have any questions regarding this project, please do not hesitate to contact our office. RM, 1;*27 /rothur C.0 OP CA _10- 1611-A SO, MELROSE OFI VS #285, VISTA, CA 92082 • 760-9454150 • FAX: 760-9454221. MAY 07 '99 11:22t1 BANKERS HILL PROPERTIES P.5 May-06-99 05:42P jue.ricanHomeLns SanDlego 760 729 7580 P.05 1• APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF FIELbEXPLOATORy TEST PIT PLOT PLAN OWNER: fritz. TAUMAA) (T LOCATION:. Po 2JçpQ.gj D L LiijIiiecrIiig, me. QVJ.GEOTCNNIC4L, 4 OIUUTY ENCNEERO CA&L Ø_4. • TRUCT'JRAI. INC rpjllg,NO • LAND SURPNO p . PERGOLA P7QN& IO?L TEI?NG A • P • N • /f - 4 xi9 CONS?RUCflON MAWAOEMENr8 tNSP4C7ON PROJECT: DATE: MAY 07 '99 11:23AM BANKERS HILL PROPERTIES P.6 May-06-99 0542P AmericanHomLnsSanDiego 760 729 7890 P.06, II&IIIIIIfJI1gCcrI#g,fr CML. OfO?kt&, OM4&PYEIGJMEERS __TA . PIOOL.47*ig IOU. TtJTTNG _ii!LL I ONST O#4M*NAGFVNFI SN8PEOflON TA c. Jv1A'l 1999 LOG OF TEST PITS EXCAVATED; Beckhe. J_9_ iO a PIT DIMENSIONS IN FEET W L I' D 5' TP4 SURFACE ELEVATION IN FEET -. DATUM Mean Sea Level CEO 1.0 C ICAl. ENGINEERING TEST DATA CLASSIFICATION • a CLASSIFICATION AND D DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION MRcrO 71eP501(- JAJ 5ILTh'34N0(ttl) - 2' -V17-4 Laos -- Per-04 Ts us- ow"J £#O I DAMIP1DEse erri o rsr * • F.IO 4jATLEg. pJo CAI/I,J# P11' DIMENSIONS IN FEET W SURFACE ELEVATION IN FEET • - - - - S - Ic.wu'.& () Mm' 07 '99 11:23RM BRHKERS HILL PROPERTIES P.7 May-06-99 05:42P PJnr1canHoTnLns Sanolego 780 729 7580 P.07' • ..aTFKr _'ft J'?/J cf,1L 5EOT(NIOA1, 5'OtUU?YEwQW€ps 3tRUQ4IVoINWWQ. LAND 8Ufr4 IIN CON 7VOTION*ANCgwen4 If46PEcY1ON ME T 1 1999 T.q SO. Test Date Test Location Test El /Depth $ell Type Dry Deiulty. pet - itt, S Relative Retest Compaction to. - Held Maximum, Held Opt.' IF-I 24" A n,a izz.0 .o 13.1 9218 t " TP-I ' 40 _ IK,.8 izz-.o 8.8 15.1 96.7 - -• -- '- __ - -- — V — VP_V_- .— - V--- • V V • V ___________________ - - - 'V • V CUM DATA V ' V 301L TYPE BID l _DE.!P!I0N. OPTIMUM MOISTURE % MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY (pat) j_2QSTDj,4.wJ JQ_ • _______ V - I2ZO, V TiTP4o V ,• !t • ,'°' EXPANSZQ$_POTENTIAL 21 .3' VVVVV VV V 53. 93. V 132 : : Low — 90 Moderate -130 High —above=Critjcal V EXp41$ION AND COMPATZON_TEBDATA ENCLOSURE ($) MAY 07 199 11:23AM BANKERS HILL PROPERTIES P.8 Ma'.y-00-99 05:43P Amer1cnHomeLns 5art01oo 780 729 70 2000 16O0 Z 1200 I-. w 800 400 .0 0 400 8.00 1200 1600 2000 NORMAL LOAD (PSF) SOIL TYPE .' OAiNO NO. DEPTH MOISTURE COHESION ANGLE OF (BN) (ft) (%) (PSF) FRICTION (.) • .54A109 r x 7c'-i .911 II&III?nglnverai'g, Iiw cML. cECTEcHN1C,*L I QWVENWNECRS S1tJCflm4l.ENOVi,PVO.L4NOIVRWWN . •LVNVAUMNMrnE1Nva ,Nc,,wl . SHEARING STRENGTH TEST iiigiiiecriug, Inc. CIVIL, GEO TECHNICAL. & QUALITY ENGINEERING FOUNDATION DESIGN • LAND SURVEYING • SOIL TESTING CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION CLIENT: MOORE PROJECT: MOO 100 U DATE: 28 JAN. 2000 D. J. MOORE 1073 Sapphire Street San Diego, CA. 92109 Subject: Soil Update for the proposed construction for-a Single Family Residence located at 2319 Pio Pico Dr., Carlsbad, CA. (APN: 156-350-04) Reference:(a) Preliminary Geotechnical Soils Investigation by B & B Engineering, Inc., dated 4 May, 1999. Dear D. J. Moore: Pursuant to your request, we have completed our site inspection and our review of Reference (a) for the subject parcel. On January 28, 1999, a representative from our firm visited the site in order to evaluate the general surface soil conditions relative to the proposed construction. Based on our visual inspections and observations in the field, and our review of Reference (a), the following conclusions were derived: Other than minor erosion and minor surface vegetation, the general overall surface soil conditions do not appear to have changed significantly since the preparation of Reference (a). It is our opinion that the subject lot may support the -1- 1611-A SO. MELROSE DRIVE #285, VISTA, CA 92083-5497 • 760-945-3150 9 FAX: 760-945-4221 ItigjitieeriIig, tue. CIVIL. GEOTECHNICAL, & QUALITY ENGINEERING FOUNDATION DESIGN • LAND SURVEYING • SOIL TESTING CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION proposed residential structure, however, the conclusions and recommendations found in the Reference (a) shall be modified as reflected in the latter part of this report. GEOLOGIC HAZARDS According to published information, there are no known active or potentially active faults on or in the immediate vicinity of the subject site. Therefore, the potential for ground rupture at this site is considered low. There are, however, several faults located.within a close proximity to this site that the movement associated with them could cause significant ground motion. The following table presents the distance of major faults fro"m the site, the assumed maximum credible earthquake magnitudes and estimated peak accelerations anticipated at the site. The probability of such an earthquake occurring during the lifetime of this project is considered low. The severity of ground motion is not anticipated to be any greater at this site than in other areas of San Diego County. SEISMICITY OF MAJOR FAULTS MAXIMUM CREDIBLE ESTIMATED FAULT DISTANCE MAGNITUDE(RICHTER) ACCELERATION(g) Rose Canyon .5 mi. 7.0 0.25 Elsinore 28 mi. 7.5 0.35 San Jacinto 51 mi. 7.8 0.17 San Andreas 75 mi. 8.3 0.12 The following information is presented relative to the subject site and Seismic Zone 4 per the U.B.C.: -2- 1611-A SO. MELROSE DRIVE #285, VISTA, CA 92083-5497 • 760-945-3150 • FAX: 760-945-4221 Hii I?tigjiiiecritig, Itic. CIVIL. GEO TECHNICAL. . QUALITY ENGINEERING FOUNDATION DESIGN • LAND SURVEYING • SOIL TESTING CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION (z) Seismic zone factor = 0.4 (Na) Near-source factor = 1.2 (A) Seismic source type = A (Sd) Soil profile type = Sd (Ca) Seismic coefficient = 0.44 Na LIQUEFACTION POTENTIAL Liquefaction analysis of the soils underlying the site was based on the consideration of various factors which include the water level, soil type gradation, relative density, intensity of ground shaking and duration of shaking. Liquefaction potential has been found to be the greatest where the ground water level is shallow and loose fine sands occur within a depth of 50 feet or less. These conditions are not present within the site area and, therefore, the potential for generalized liquefaction in the event of a strong to moderate earthquake on nearby faults is considered to be low. STABILITY The relatively dense nature of the slopes within the site and the nature of the material underlying the site generally preclude the occurrence of major landslide' conditions. The area surrounding the site is not known to be within an area of ground subsidence. The potential for deep seated slope failure at the subject site is considered low. The site surface materials consist of silty/clayey soils that are relatively dense in their dry state. These materials are susceptible to erosion. Drainage control is essential to maintain the stability of any planned slopes -or slope areas. MIC 1611-A SO. MELROSE DRIVE #285, VISTA, CA 92083-5497 9 760-945-3150 9 FAX 760-945-4221 l3mjiticeritig, Itic. CIVIL. GEOTECHNICAL & QUALITY ENGINEERING FOUNDATION DESIGN • LAND SURVEYING • SOIL TESTING CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION FOUNDATIONS It is recommended that the continuous perimeter foundations and concrete slabs for a light weight wood-framed structure shall be reinforced in accordance with the following minimum designs: For slab-on-grade floors: it is recommended that the continuous perimeter foundations for a single story structure shall extend a minimum depth of 18 inches and a minimum width of 12 inches into the compacted fill material as measured from the lowest adjacent grade. A minimum of 24 inches deep by 15 inches wide shall be used for a two story structure. All foundations shall be reinforced with at least four No. 4 steel bars, two bars shall be placed 3 inches from the top of the foundation and the other bars shall be placed 3 inches from the bottom. As an alternative to the 4 No. 4 steel rebars, one No. 5 steel rebar top and bottom may be used. All interior concrete slabs shall be a minimum of four inches in thickness and reinforced with a minimum of No. 3 rebar at 18 inches on center both ways placed in the center of the slab. ,The slab steel reinforcement shall be bent downward into the perimeter footings and connected to the foundation steel at 18 inches on center. In order to minimize vapor transmission, an impermeable membrane (ie: 6 mil visqueen) shall be placed over 2 inches of clean, poorly graded, coarse sand, decomposed granite, or crushed rock. The membrane shall be covered with 2 inches of sand to protect it during construction and the sand should be lightly moistened just prior to placing concrete. All concrete used on this project shall have a minimum compressive strength of 2500 psi unless otherwise stated on the Building Plans. -4- 1611-A SO. MELROSE DRIVE #285, VISTA, CA 92083-5497 • 760-945-3150 9 FAX: 760-945-4221 Etigiiieeriiig, tue. CIVIL. GEO TECHNICAL. & DUALITY ENGINEERING FOUNDATION DESIGN • LAND SURVEYING • SOIL TESTING CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION If imported soil materials are used during grading to bring the building pad to the design elevations, or if variations of soils or building locations are encountered, foundation and slab designs shall be reevaluated by our firm upon the completion of foundation excavations. Footings located on or adjacent to the top of slopes shall be extended to a sufficient depth to provide a minimum horizontal distance of 7 feet between the bottom edge of the footing and the face of the slope. Findings of this Report are valid as of this date; however, changes in conditions of a property can occur with passage of time, whether they be due to natural process or works of man on this or adjacent properties. In addition, changes in applicable or appropriate standards occur whether they result from legislation or broadening of knowledge. Accordingly, findings of this Report may be invalidated wholly or partially by changes outside our control. Therefore, this Report is subject to review and should not be relied upon after a period of one year. In. the event that any changes in the nature, design, or location of buildings are planned, the conclusions and recommendations contained in this Report shall not be considered valid unless the changes are reviewed and the conclusions of this Report are modified or verified in writing. This Report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the owner or of his representative to ensure that the information and recommendations contained herein are called to the attention of the project Architect and Engineer and are incorporated into the plans. Further, the necessary steps shall be taken to ensure that the contractor and subcontractors carry out such recommendations in the field. -5- 1611-A SO. MELROSE DRIVE #285, VISTA, CA 92083-5497 • 760-945-3150 • FAX: 760-945-4221 I3iiçjinecritig, file. CIVIL. GEO TECHNICAL. & OVAL/TV ENGINEERING FOUNDATION DESIGN • LAND SURVEYING • SOIL TESTING CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION It is recommended that the Soil Engineer be provided the opportunity for a general review of the final design plans and specifications for this project in order that the recommendations of this report may be properly interpreted and implemented in the design. It is also recommended that the Soil Engineer be provided the opportunity to verify the foundation and slab construction in the field prior to placing concrete. (If the Soil Engineer is not accorded the privilege of making these reviews, he can assume no responsibility for misinterpretation of his recommendations). The Soil Engineer has prepared this Report for the exclusive use of the client and authorized agents. This Report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted soil and foundation engineering practices. No other'warranties, either expressed or implied, are made as to the professional advice provided under the terms of this agreement, and included in the Report. B & B Engineering Inc. and Associates appreciate this opportunity to be of service. Should you have any questions regarding this project, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, ,DFESS/cj' C. CO 'RGE127 0 Exp. 12d1/O1 R Beard R QE RGE Chief Engineer 1611-A SO. MELROSE DRIVE #285, VISTA, CA 92083-5497 • 760-945-3150 • FAX: 760-945-4221 4 t ('1 I?iigjiiiccriiig, Inc. CIVIL. CEOTECHNICAL, & QUALITY ENGINEERING FOUNDATION DESIGN • LAND SURVEYING • SOIL TESTING CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION CLIENT: MOORE PROJECT: MOO 500 DATE: 31 MAY 2000 D. J. MOORE 26124 Jesmondine Road Escondido, CA. 92026 Subject: Seismic Soil Factors for the lot located at 2319 Pio Pico Drive, Carlsbad, CA. (APN: 156-350-04) Reference (a): Soil Update Report by B & B Engineering, Inc, dated 28 January 2000. Dear Ms. Moore: Upon review of Reference (a), the following information is submitted regarding the seismic soil factors for the subject parcel. SEISMICITY OF MAJOR FAULTS MAXIMUM ESTIMATED MAGNITUDE CREDIBLE FAULT DISTANCE (RICHTER) ACCELERATION (g) Elsinore ., 10 mi. 7.5 0.35 San Jacinto 23 mi. 7.8 . 0.17 Rose Canyon .46 mi. 7.0 0.25 San Andreas . 70 mi. 8.3 0.12 The following information is presented relative to the subject site and Seismic Zone 4 per the U.B.C.: (z) Seismic zone factor = 0.4 Table 16 A-I (Na) Near-source factor = 1.0 Table 16 A-S (B) Seismic source type = A Table 16 A-U (Sb) Soil profile type = Sd Table 16 A-J (Ca) Seismic coefficient '= 0.40 Na Table 16 A-Q (Cv) Seismic coefficient = 0.64 Nv Table 16 A-R (Nv) Near source factor = 1.0 Table 16 A-T 1 1611-A SO. MELROSE DRIVE #285, VISTA, CA 92083-5497 • 760-945-3150 • FAX: 760-945-4221 Mir IN Etigitiecritigj, Ijic. CIVIL, GEO TECHNICAL. & QUALITY ENGINEERING FOUNDATION DESIGN • LAND SURVEYING • SOIL TESTING CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION This Report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the owner or of his representative to ensure that the information and recommendations contained herein are called to the attention of the project Architect and Engineer and are incorporated into the plans. Further, the necessary steps shall be taken to ensure that the contractor and subcontractors carry out such recommendations in the field. The Soil Engineer has prepared this Report for the exclusive use of the client and authorized agents. This Report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted soil and foundation engineering practices. No other warranties, either expressed or implied, are made as to the professional advice provided under the terms of this agreement, and included in the Report. B & B Engineering Inc. and Associates appreciate this opportunity to be of service. Should you have any questions regarding this project, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, 'fc RGE 127 c\ 1 Exp. ii1 I 1* e,,Athbur ard RCE RGE Chief Engineer 2 1611-A SO. MELROSE DRIVE #285, VISTA, CA 92083-5497 9 760-945-3150 9 FAX: 760-945-4221 iIiI I3iigjitieeriiqj, tue. CIVIL. GEOTECHNICAL. S QUALITY ENGINEERING FOUNDATION DESIGN • LAND SURVEYING • SOIL TESTING CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENTS INSPECTION CLIENT: MOORE PROJECT: MOO-CERT DATE: 28 APRIL 2000 D.J. MOORE 1073 Saphire Street San Diego, CA. 92109 Attention: Mr. Robert Carlin Subject: Soils Engineer Certification for the project located at 2319 Pio Pico Drive, Carlsbad, CA. (APN: 156-350-04) (Moore Residence) Gentlemen: Pursuant to the City of Carlsbad requirements, this letter will serve as confirmation that the foundation plans and specifications have been reviewed for the subject project. We have determined that the recommendations in our Preliminary Geotechnical Soils Investigation dated 4 May 1999, have been properly incorporated into the construction documents. Sincerely, OFES3it co (I 'RGE127' 1 U / Exp.121/Qi Arthur C. Beard RCE RQE RGE Chief Engineer 1611-A SO. MELROSE DRIVE #285, VISTA, CA 92083-5497 • 760-945-3150 9 FAX: 760-945-4221 City of Carlsbad 41FOY Building Department CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE PAYMENT OF SCHOOL FEES OR OTHER MITIGATION This form must be completed by the City, the applicant, and the appropriate school districts and returned to the City prior to issuing a building permit. The City will not issue any building permit without a completed school fee form. Project Name: 23(5k //) /q/I,/) Building Permit PlanChëck Number: Project Address: A.P.N.: / 35- Project Applicant (Owner Name): Project Description: Building Type: Residential: Square Feet of Living Area in New Dwelling 7' 7 Second Dwelling Unit: Square Feet of Living Area in SDU Residential Additions: Net Square Feet New Area Commercial/Industrial: City Certification of Applicant Information: Square Feet Floor Area ['HIN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD Carlsbad Unified School District San Marcos Unified School District 801 Pine Ave. 215 Mata Way Carlsbad CA 92009 (729-9291) San Marcos, CA 92069 (736-2200) Encinitas Union School District San Dieguito Union High School District 101 South Rancho Santa Fe Rd 710 Encinitas Blvd. Encinitas, CA 92024 (944-4300) Encinitas, CA 92024 (753-6491) Certification of Applicant/Owners. The person executing this declaration ("Owner") certifies under penalty of perjury that (1) the information provided above is correct and true to the best of the Owner's knowledge, and that the Owner will file an amended certification of payment and pay he additional fee if Owner requests an increase in the number of dwelling units or square footage after the building prmit i issued or if the initial determination of units or square footage is found to be incorrect, and that (2) the Owrer is the qwner/,tleveloper of the above described project(s), or that the person executing this declaration is authorized to sigon behalf of thh Owner. Signature: Date: 1635 Faraday Av4nue. Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-2700 • FAX (760) 602-8560 R 52 Revised 4/20/00 SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL FEE CERTIFICATION (To be completed by the school district(s)) THIS FORM INDICATES THAT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROJECT HAVE BEEN OR WILL BE SATISFIED. SCHOOL DISTRICT: The undersigned, being duly authorized by the applicable School District, certifies that the developer, builder, or owner has satisfied the obligation forschool facilities. This is to certify that the applicant listed on page 1 has paid all amounts or completed other applicable school mitigation determined by the School District. The City may issue building permits for this project. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICIAL TITLE NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT DATE PHONE NUMBER -,. 7 £3J