The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2362 ALTISMA WAY; ; CB891681; Permit’ * BUILDING PERMIT 12/28/89 09:17 Page 1 of 1 Development No: Permit No: CB891681 Project No: A8902847 I Job Address: 2362 ALTISMA WY Permit Type: RESIDENTAL ADDITION/ALTERATION Parcel No: 215-240-34-01 C-FRflT 322.00 Str : F1: Ste: 2316 ~2/2e/89 0oo.t 01. 02 Valuation: 200,000 Construction TVDe: NEW Occupancy Group: Description: REPAIR FOUNDATION Applied : 10/24/89 Apr/Issue : 12/28/89 Validated By: JPY ” Class Code: Status: ISSUED 714-730-9167 Credits *** 1,326.00 .oo Ext fee Data 322.00 990.00 644.00 1648.00 14.00 CITY OF CAFILSBAD 2075 Lar Palmas Dr., Carlsbad CA 92009 (619) 4351161 PERMIT APPLICATION City of Carlsbad Building Department 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 1. PERMIT TYPE (JTENANT IWPRDVEMEYT REMOVAL OF GARAGE SLAB. AND REMOVING 5@ YDS SOIL AND FOUNDATION REPAIR BLDG. SO. FTG. 3. CONTACT PERSON X DF STORIES 9 FU PFR WC: NAMJ31CK ANDERSON , cin &-E Zip CWE DAY TELEPHONE 714-730-9167 g-?$$?&s A- R ss 621 SOUTH "B" STREET, TUSTIN CA 92680 SIGNATURE 4. APPLICANT fl CONTII*CTOR YAM OAGENT FOR CONIRACTOR OWNER ADORES6 OAGENT FOR WWER ClT" EMERCoN IN'* TUSTIN STATECA LIP ~~~92680 5. PROPERTY OWNER DAY TELEPHONE 714-730-9167 WNERDENNIS HElNE (PRESlm3) OTEUANI CASITAS DE LA COSTA ADDRESS CIII HOME OWNERS ASSC.LA CQ6tTA CAe CWE Dl\" TELEPHONE 619-741-5343 6. CONTRACTOR EMERCON INC ~DORESS 621 SOUTH "B" STREET, TUSTIN SlATCA ZIP CWE 96280 DAY rELEPHDNE714-730-9167 CRAIG SEATON STATE tic. X 525903 LlCLWEL CLASS B-1 CITY BUSINESS LIC. X SIGNATURE DESIGNER NAME TITLE SLJpFRlNTFNnFNv 101701Rq ADDRESS CITY CORREIA CONSULTING ZIP CWE DAY TELEPHONE 71 fi- - 17011 BEACH BLVD, HUNTINGTON BCH, CA 92647 ". 7. WORKERS' COMPENSATION Workers' Conpensetion Declaration: i hereby affirm that I have a Cerfiflcafe of CMS~~ to self-insure is%& by the Direcfor of lndurfrisl Relations, o? a certificate of Workers' Conpensation Insurance by an adnifted Insurer, or an exact copy or duplicate thereof certified by the Director Of the insurer thereof filed with the Building Inspection Deprfmnf (Section 3800. tab. C). 8. mER-BUImR 'OECLARATION 0 I as owner of the property or my qloyeer with wages a5 rhelr sole r-nrafion. wiil do the work and the sfruCfure is not intended Or offered for sale (sec. 1046, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law doer not apply fa an owner of pwperty who builds 01 inproves thereon.. and who doer such work himself or through his own enployeer. provlded fhaf such inpmvemnfs ere not intended or offered far sale. If. however. the building or iwrovemnf is sold uifhin me year of canpletlan. the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he dld not build 01 iwrove for the FUrwre of *ale.). Omer-Bu?lder Declaration: I hereby afflim rhar I am exempt frm the Confra~for~s Llcen~e Law far the following reason: 0 I. as wner of the pnperty, am exclurively confrscfing uifh licensed ~mfva~fors to CO~L~TYC~ the project (Sec. 1044. BuIlneSs and Plofcsrionr Code: The C~nfra~f~r's License tar does not apply to an owner of property rho Wilds or iwrover thereon. and cmfracfP for such projects with COnfraCfOT(L1 licensed prsusnt fo the C~ncracfor~s License tau). 0 I am cienpr under section Businerr and Proferrions Code for this rearon: (Sec. 7031.5 Busines5 and Professions Code: Any City or County which ?quires a permit to c~nsfru~f. alter, >"prove. demlish. Or repsir any BtlYCfYre, prior to Its issuance, ais0 requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed rfafemnf that he is licensed wrsuanf to The provisions of the Contractor's License La" (Chapter 9. cmnencing with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Bvslness and Professions Code) 01 that he is ex-( therefrm. and the basis for the alleged exemption. Lny vlolation of Secfim 7031.1 by any appllcanl far a permit subjects the applicant to a Civil pMlfy Of not _re than five hundred dollars II500i). SIGNATURE DATE COIIPLETE THIS SECTION FOR WOW-RES1DEYTIP.L BUllDlYG PERMITS OWL": 1s the applicant or fufure building occupant required to subnit a business plan. acutely hazardous materials regirtration farm or risk mnag-nt and Prevenfion program under Sections 25505. 25533 or 25534 of the Prerley-lamer Hazardous Subrtance ACCDYnt act? 0 YES 0 NO Is the s~plicanf or future buildins occupant required to Obtain a pmit frm the air pllurlan cmfrol district or air quality managenen1 district? OYES 0 yo Is the facility to be cmsfrucfed Hithin 1,000 feet af the outer barndary of a school site? n HD 10/24/90 12: 07 BUILDING PERMIT Project No: A8902847 Permit No: CB891681 Job Address: 2362 ALTISMA WY Page 1 of 1 Development No: Permit Type: RESIDENTAL ADDITION/ALTERATION Valuation: Parcel No: 215-240-34-01 Construction Type: NEW 200,000 Occupancy Group: Description: REPAIR FOUNDATION Str: F1: Ste: Class Code: Appl/Ownr : EMERCON INC 621 SOUTH 'IB" ST. TUSTIN, CA 96280 Applied: 10/24/89 Status: FINAL Apr/Issue: 12/28/89 Validated By: JPY 714-730-9167 CONTRACTOR : EMERCON INC. Lic. C NO 714-730-9167 TUSTIN, CA 96280 621 SOUTH l'Bll ST *** Fees Required *** *** Fees Collected & Credits *x* """""""""""""" ....................... Fees : Adjustments: Total Fees: 1,648.00 .oo 1,648.00 Total Payments: Total Credits: .oo 1,648.00 .oo Balance Due: Fee description Units Fee/Unit Ext fee Data Building Permit Plan Check Strong Motion Fee * BUILDING TOTAL 990.00 644.00 1648.00 14.00 .- I i CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT# CB891681 FOR 09/28/90 DESCRIPTION: REPAIR FOUNDATION PLANCK# CB891681 INSPECTOR AREA TP OCC GRP TYPE: RAD JOB ADDRESS: 2362 ALTISMA wy CONTRACTOR: EMERCON INC. OWNER: APPLICANT: EMERCON INC REMARKS: RES/MH/JCC/800-734-9167 SPECIAL INSTRUCT: CONSTR. TYPE NEW PHONE: 714-730-9167 PHONE: 714-730-9167 STR: FL: STE : PHONE : INSPECTOR TOTAL TIME: --RELATED PERMITS" PERMIT# TYPE STATUS ISSUED CB900562 CD LVL DESCRIPTION ACT COMMENTS 19 ST Final Structural .Fad# U FPN/h " " " - ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** 092690 032990 032990 032690 032690 031290 030990 030290 022290 022290 022190 022190 021490 DATE DESCRIPTION ACT INSP COMMENTS Final Structural CA TP RES 9/27/90 JCC Steel/Bond Beam AP TP GARAGE SLAB Fta/Foundation/Piers AP TP GARAGE SLAB Steel/Bond Beam Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Steel/Bond Beam Ftg/Foundation/Piers Steel/Bond Beam Ftg/Foundation/Piers Steelpond Beam AP AP AP AP CA AP AP AP AP PA TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP WDM GARAGE SLAB GARAGE SLAB GRD BMS/BLDG A1,2,3,4,5,6,PIL GRDE BMS/BLDG A 8,9,11,12 PIL PILES 3,6,7,10 OIK TO POUR ENG LETTERS REQ PILES 8,9.11,12,0K TO POUR PILES 1,2,4,5,0K TO POUR SOUTHWEST INSPECTION & TESTING 1879 W. COMMONWEALTH AVE., SUITE K FULLERTON, CALIFORNIA 92633 PH. (71 4) 526-8441 FAX (71 4) 526-1 803 TYPE OF SAMPLE SLUMP ADDITIONAL REMARKS ON SAMPLES QUANTITY IN SET 3 I I I INSPECTION SUMMARY -LOCATIONS OF WORK INSPECTED. TEST SAMPLES TAKEN, WORK REJECTED, JOB PROBLEMS, PROGRESS, REMARKS, ETC. INCLUDES INFORMATION ABOUT. AMOUNTS OF MATERIAL PLACED OR WORK PERFORMED, NUMBER, TYPE a IOENT. NOS OF TEST SAMPLES TAKEN: STRUCT. CONNECTiONS (WELD MADE H.T. BOLTS TORQUED) CHECKED ETC. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE 0 PAGE OF OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. I HAVE FOUND THIS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 1 HAVE INSPECTED TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEWE AU WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PUNS, SPECIFICATIONS. AN0 APPLICABLE L” I / 9,Wl a SECTIONS OF THE GOVERNING BUILDING UWS. 6 TIME IN CYLINDERS O.T. HOURS REG. HOURS TIME OUT All inspections based on a minimum of 4 hours and over 4 hours - 8 hour minimum. In eddllion, my inspeclion extending past nwn hour will be an 8 hour minimum. Approved By SPECIALTY NO. AGENCY WHITE. OFFICE COPY, CANARY - ACCOUNTING COPY, PINK - INSPECTORS COPY, GOLDENROD. JOB SITE COPY SOUTHWEST INSPECTION &K TESTING 1879 W. COMMONWEALTH AVE., SUITE K FULLERTON, CALIFORNIA 92633 PH. (714) 526-8441 FAX (714) 526-1803 Reinforced Concrete 0 Structural Steel Assembly fl Ouality Control fl Post Tensioned Concrete fl Fire Proofing C1 Other ~~~ ~ TYPE OF SAMPLE SLUMP ADDITIONAL REMARKS ON SAMPLES QUANTITY IN SET 3 3wo 731 C~H,CAS rz-, I I I INSPECTION SUMMARY - LOCATIONS OF WORK INSPECTED. TEST SAMPLES TAKEN. WORK REJECTED. JOB PROBLEMS, PROGRESS. REMARKS, ETC. INCLUDES INFORMATION ABOUT - AMOUNTS OF MATERIAL PLACED OR WORK PERFORMED, NUMBER, NPE 6 IDENT. NOS OF TEST SAMPLES TAKEN: STRUCT. CONNECTIONS (WELD MADE H.T. BOLTS TORQUED) CHECKED: ETC. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE 0 PAGE - OF c OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. I HAVE FOUND THIS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE ALL WORK TO MMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS. AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE GOVERNING BUILDING LAWS 3 ing past nwn hour will be an SPECIALTY NO AGENCY WHITE - OFFICE COPY, CANARY -ACCOUNTING COPY, PINK. INSPECTOR'S COPY, GOLDENROD. JOB SITE COPY SOUTHWEST INSPECTION & TESTING 1879 W. COMMONWEALTH AVE., SUITE K PH. (714) 526-8441 FAX (714) 526-1803 FULLERTON, CALIFORNIA 92633 L CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE COhlTlNUED ON NEXT PAGE 0 PAGE - OF k TI?& Ihl CYLINDERS O.T. HOURS tl& OUT REO. HOURS OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. I HAVE FOUND THIS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEWE ALL WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS. AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE GOVERNING BUILDING LAWS. /#/& I /!YfI x I "13 All b~peclbns based on a minimum 01 4 hours and wer 4 hours - 8 hour minimum. In addition. any inspection extending pasf nmn bur will be an 8 hour minimum. a E OF REGISTERED INSPECTOR C@ d CA &L \ fd 7 EA/ Approved By SPECIALPI NO. AQENCV . Projeci Suprintendent WHITE. OFFICE COPY, CANARY. ACCOUNTING COPY, PINK - INSPECTOR'S COPY, GOLDENROD - JOB SITE COPY SOUTHWEST INSPECTION AND TESTING INC. 1879 W. commonwealth Ave. Suite K Fullerton, Ca. 92633 (714 526-8441 . ._ ...... CONCRETE : X GUNITE: REPORT OF GROUT : MORTAR : PROJECT: CASATIS OE LACOSTA ADDRESS: 2362-74 AbTISM, CARLSBAD CONTRACTOR: FRANK TORRES PROJECT NO. : 00111 DRTE : 70/03/27 ENGINEER: CORREIA ARCHITECT: * LOCATION IN STRUCTURE: C&SONS AT NORTH END 2 IN GARAGE 2 IN FRONT CONCRETE SUPPLIER: MARCON PLANT: SAN MARCOS .".......I "" - .. ......... ................. MIX NO: 89102 ADMIXTURE: * TICKET NO: 043494 TYPE OF CEMENT: I1 SLUMP: 6" AIR TEMP: 40 CONCRETE TEMP: 60 MIXING TIME (MINS): * WATER ADDED (GAL) : 10 ........_.I """""""_" - ...... DATE CAST: 2/15/90 RECEIVED AT LAB: 2/16/90 SPECIMENS MADE BY: MIKE REYNOLDS SPECIFIED PSI: 3000 I FIELD IDENTIFICATION I A IB LAB IDENTIFICATION : 00600 : 00600 : 00600 : AGE DAYS :7 : 28 : 28 DATE TESTED : 2/22 : 3/15 : 3/15 I I I I I C'I D I !E I I- 1 I I ""_"" I I ".. I .... ........... """"_ 1-2 "" -1 ""I -~- 1 1 I SIZE--IN. : 6x12 : 6x12 : 6x12 AREA-.-SO. IN. : 28.27 : 28.27 : 28.27 : CRUSI.1 LOAO-LBS . : 78000 : 151000 : 143000 : COMP-STR . .-PSI . : 2759 : 5341 : 5058 H/D CORR FACTOR CORR .-STR .-PSI. : """ "- """"" .. ..... DISTRIBUTION: ............. ......... ..... REMARKS: * NOT PROVIDED BY INSPECTOR COMPLIES: /I DOES NOT ,COMPLY: I ".__.....".I "" ............. I SAMPLES CAST BY OTHERS: I Y SUBMITTED NSPECTION AND TESTING ES LAB. MANAQER SOUTHWEST INSPECTION AND TESTING INC. 1879 W. Commonwealth Ave. Suite K Fullerton, Ca. 92633 (714 1 526-8441 """"_ - - ......... ". ..... - ....... ........... .... - ....... CONCRETE: X GUNITE: REPORT OF GROUT : MORTAR : PROJECT: CRSITAS DE LA COSTA FROJECT NO. : 00.1 1 ADDRESS: 2374 &ISMA WAY DATE: ?0,'01/0? CONTRACTOR: FRANK TORRES ENGINEER: LJILLIAM CORREIA ARCHITECT: * LOCATION IN STRUCTURE: OVER CAP 12 .... ................... ... ............... .-I - .... - - ......... .- ............ ." .... - .. _" ." - .- - - ." ................................... CONCRETE SUPPLIER: MARCON PLANT: SAN MARCCIS MIX NO: 89102 TICKET NO: 044063 SLUMP: 5" AIR TEMP: 65 CONCRETE TEMP: 68 MIXING TIME (MINS 1: 70 ADMIXTURE: POZZ TYPE OF CEMENT: I1 WATER ADDED (GAL) : '3 DATE CAST:' 3/2/90 RECEIVED AT LAB: 2/5/90 .. . ,,.. SPECIMENS MADE BY: DON LARSON SPECIFIED PSI: 3000 I I I I I I I I FIELD IDENTIFICATION ! A ' . ". I I "---"" ....... LAB IDENTIFICATION : 00768 : 00768 : 00768 : .............. -_ ...... . 8 ."-."".-I." 1 -."---.-.I."" 1 ...... AGE DAYS :7 l _"""" I : 28 DATE TESTED : 28 : 3/9 : 3/30 ': 3/30 , : SIZE-IN. AREA-SP .IN. : 6x12 : 6x12 : 6x12 : 28.27 : 28.27 : 28.27 : CRUSH LOAD..-LBS. : l08bOO : ibQ000 : i63006 : COMP-STR .-PSI. : 3820 : 5659 : 5765 CORR FhCTOR CORR .-STR .-PSI. ; .B IC ID I I .I WD ., ,. t *i "- "" ~ .............................. DISTRIBUTION: ........ . "" ""_"""""" "-. ............. ......... REMARKS: * NOT PROVIDED BY INSPECTOR COMPLIES: ... ..,................__._......I " I__" _."""" ........ DOES NOT COMPLY: I I 5,hFlPLES CAST BY OTHERS: I PECTION AND TESTING ' SOUTHWEST INSPECTION AND TESTING INC. 1879 W. Commonwealth Ave. Suite K Fuller ton, Ca . 92633 (714) 526-"8441 i ~"""""" ". ...... -l=I:=z=z ..._..__ .. ............ REPORT OF CONCRETE: X GUNI'TE : GROUT : MORTAR: PROJECT : ADDRESS: 2374 42Ea3 WAY PROJECT NO. : OOa1 DATE : ?0/01/@2 CONTRACTOR: * ENGINEER: * ARCHITECT: * LOCATION IN STRUCTURE: * CONCRETE SUPFLIER: * PLANT: 3 MIX NO: * ADMIXTURE: * TICKET 'NO: * TYPE OF CEMENT: * AIR TEMP: * CONCRETE. TEMP: * MIXING TIME (MINS): * .. -. ....................... . . . .......... SLUMP: * WATER ADDED (GAL) : * """ "- i" ... __""-".I .............. -" ....... DATE CAST: 2/22/90 RECEIVED AT LAB: 3/5/90 SPECIMENS MADE BY: MIKE REYNOLDS SPECIFIED PSI: V "" I I I I I I I I FIELD IDENTIFICATION i A LAB IDENTIFICATION AGE DAYS : 14 : 28 : 28 DATE TESTED : 3/8 : 3/22 : 3/22 SIZF,"IN. : 6x12 : 6x12 : 6x12 AREA--SO .IN. : 28.27 : 28.27 : 28.27 : CRUSH LOAD--LBS . : 99500 : 130000 : 136000 : COMP-STR .-PSI. : 3519 : 4881 : 4810 CORR FACTOR CORR .-STR .-PSI. I I I IC ID ;E I ____ ... .. I"..I_ I """"_ 1 .. ; ............. i ""- "" I I I : 00763 : 00763 ! 00763 : A- 1 1 1 . ...... I I I I H/D ., SAMPLES CAST BY 01 HERS: I LY SUBMITTED IkSPECTION AND TESTING ES LAB. MANAGER SOUTHWEST INSPECTION AND TESTING INC. 1879 W. Commonwealth Ave. Suite K Fullerton, Ca. 92633 (714 ) 526-8441 ......................................... . "_ CONCRETE: X REPORT OF GUNITE: GROUT : MORTAR: PROJECT: CASITAS DE LA COSTA ADDRESS: 2362 ALTISMA, CARLSBAD CONTRACTOR: EMERCON ENGINEER: WILLIAM LJ. CARREIA ARCHITECT: * LOCATION IN STRUCTURE: 15 LOAD GRADE BEAMS AROUND CAISSON #3 CONCRETE SUPPLIER: MAR-CON PRODUCTS PLANT: SAN MARCOS MIX NO: K.8 ADMIXTURE: POZZ TICKET NO: 044320 TYPE OF CEMENT: * AIR TEMP: 71 CONCRETE TEMP: * MIXING TIME (MINS): 50 PROJECT NO.: 0041 DAiE: 90/04/13 . .. """""" """"" ......... ~- .................. " "- ""_ - SLUMP: 5" , WATER ADDED (GAL) : IO DATE CAST: 3/12/90 RECEIVED AT LAB: 3/13/90 SPECIMENS MADE BY: CLYDE LACHER SPECIFIED PSI: 3000 .I I I I I I I I I I I I I I FIELD IDENTIFICATION I A IB """"""""""" 9 """"_I 1 """_ '"1 """"I 1 IC ID ;E IF LA^ IDENTIFICATION' I : 00874 : 00874 : 00874 : :7 : 28 : 28 I I I I I 1 1 i """"_ 1 """"I 1 I . AGE DAYS DATE TESTED : 3/19 : 4/9 : 4/9 SIZE-IN. : 6x12 : 6x12 : 6x12 AREA-SO .IN. : 28.27 : 28.27 : 28.27 : CRUSH LOAD-LBS . : 89000 , ! 151000 : 156000 : COMP-STR .-PSI. : 3148 : 5341 : 5517 CORR FACTOR CORR . -STR .-PSI . I I I HID : - "" i ..... " DISTRIBUTION: 1-EMERCON . ....................... """"""" - ""_ - "" - """"""""" REMARKS: * NO PAPERWORK PROVIDED ........... COMPLIES: 4 DOES NOT COMPLY: I b SAMPLES CAST BY OTHERS: I I LY SUBMITTED WSPECTION AND TESTING LAB . ~ANAGER SOUTHWEST INSPECTION & TESTING 1879 W. COMMONWEALTH AVE., SUITE K FULLERTON, CALIFORNIA 92633 PH. (714) 526-8441 FAX (714) 526-1803 INSPECTION SUMMARY - LOCATIONS OF WORK INSPECTED, TEST SAMPLES TAKEN, WORK REJECTED. JOB PROBLEMS, PROGRESS, REMARKS, ETC. OF TEST SAMPLES TAKEN: STRUCT CONNECTIONS (WELD MADE H.T. BOLTS TORQUED) CHECKED; ETC. INCLUDES INFORMATION ABOUT. AMOUNTS OF MATERIAL PLACED OR WORK PERFORMED, NUMBER, TYPE a IDENT. NOS CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE U PAGE ~ OF ~ I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE ALL OFTHE ABOVE REPORTED WORK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 1 HAVE FOUND THIS TIME IN SECTIONS OF THE GOVERNING BUILDING LAWS. WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE CYLINDERS O.T. HOURS REG. HOURS TIME OUT 12:30Pb 5:lOdn 81 13 Don Larson minimum. In addition, any inspection exlending pol nmn hour wlll be an 8 hour minimum. Approved By SPECIALTY NO AGENCY P?ajecl Superintenden1 WHITE - OFFICE COPY, CANARY - ACCOUNTING COPY, PINK - INSPECTOR'S COPY, GOLDENROD. Jon SITE COPY I , I I i I i .. 0' 'HAKiMiAN EUGINEERING (21 33 948-7783 ?WOS.LAD*NACOURT b SANTI PE SPRINQS. CAS0870 Legal Descri,ption:. , Plan Ch&k Nk ~ UAKIMEAN ENGINEERING (21 3) 946-7783 0 13009 LADANA COURT 8ANTA PE SPRINGS, CA 90670 ! ' ,, ! INSPECTtOlN REPORT .. I i' ,, Address: Date: ,. !. CdPLqBah , a ~ Legal Description: i I Client: CW /!! 49. Plan Check No . " t Type of '.Inspection c-d .. €7G4wn7'/oJ A% Reference Report= *E ESGIL CORPOFWTION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 208 (619) 560-1468 SAN DIEGO. CA 92123 .. = The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected vhere necessary and substantially com?ly with the jurisdiction's building codes. - The Dlans transmitted herewith will substantiallv co;iiDlv u with-the jurisdiction's building co6es when aino; 6eficien- " ties identified sre resolved and checked by building department staff. 0 identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected The plans transmitted herewith heve significant deficiencies and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the 0 The .plans are being held at Esoil €or?. until corrected 0 jurisdiction to return to the apg1,icant contact person. 0 The applicant's copy of the check list bas been sent to: . Esgil staff did not advise the applicant contact person that plan check has been completed. 0 Esgil staff did advise applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted: Telephone - ' 0 REMARKS: By : S& Enclosures: hJ. One ESGIL CORPORATION : OGA CIAA Ow ODM* \a -\ a . ESGIL CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR.. SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO, CA 92 123 (619) 5601468 0 necessary and substantially com?ly with the jurisdiction's The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where building codes. The Dlans transmitted herewith will substantially cozply 0 with'the jurisdiction's building codes when minor eeficien- cies identified are resolved and checked by building department staff. 0 identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Cor?. until corrected plans are submitted :or recheck. 0 The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to return to the apalicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has Seen sent to: T1C.k GMdV501\ b2 \ i% ST . -G5T* rA - - &. - Esgil staff did not advise the applicant contact person that plan check has been completed. 0 Esgil staff did advise applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted: Telephone # __ 0 REMARKS: By: %ad re Enclosures: hs ESGIL CORPORATION \0"$4 OGA OAA Ow ODM. 0 Buildin'g Permit fee. S s do3C1.50 .. REMODEL OR TEN?,.ST IM?!?OVE??E?<'T COMSTRUCTION VALtiATI@?I The Building Official is mandated by State law to deterxine the value of work proposed in each application for a Building Permit. The valae to be used, shall be the total value of all construction work for which the permit is issued as well as all finish work, painting, roofing, electrical, plumbing, heating, air conditioning, elevators, fire extins uishing systems and any other permanent equipment. Uniform Building Code Section 304 (a) APPLICANT PLEASE COMPLETE ....................................................................... AREA OF @ REMODEL F/-s UAW~ TENANT IMPROVEMENT 0 ADDITION PROPOSED WORK INCLUDES: NEW SUSPENDED CEILING 0 YES Ja" NO NEW HVAC 0 YES G3 NO NEW FIRE SPRINKLERS 0 YES NEW PARTITIONS NEW PLUMBING NEW ELECTRICAL HAS A CONTRACTORS ESTIMATE BEEN RECEIVED FOR THE PROPOSED WORK?[ ]YES [AN0 ITEMIZED COST ESTIMATE IS ATTACHED [ ] YES [d NO I CEZTIFY THE VALUE OF ALL PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION WORK COVEZED BY THE PERMIT APPLICATION INCLUDING: ALL STRUCTURAL WORK, FINISH WORK, PAINT- ING, ROOFING, ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, HEATING, AIR CONDITIONING, ELEVATORS,, FIRE EXTINGUISHING SYSTEMS, AND ALL PERMANENT EQUIPMENT IS:$ @. JCl7,L.W- THIS VALUE IS BASED ON: DESIGNER'S ESTIMATE 0 CONTRACTOR'S ESTIMATE 0 OTHER, DESCRIBE BASIS THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT ~~ 5enLr. Prz/445 F&7 &?leRd T= 0 APPLICANT c] DESIGNER CONTR.CTOR PLAN CXECKEX USE ONLY TES VALUE IS ACCEPTABLE AX iTZXIZZD COST BREAKDOWN IS XEQUIRED CONST2UCTION VALUE. 0 YES o N BY : -7" DATZ : " l-qT-7 167 I STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS FOUNDATION REPAIR CASITAS DE LA- COSTA 2362-2374 ALTISMA WAY CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA CNA INSURANCE " P I i/ I/' I 1 : ! ! i J I i I I i r ?701? BEACH BLVD. Sum 580 HUNTINGTON BEACH CAW P2M7 714442-5331 r CLAIM NUMBER: INSURED: INS 80624 8S-C7288 CAS1T.W DE LA COSTA 2352-2374 ALTISMA WAY CLXLSEAD, CALIFORNIA AXUST 25, 1988 REQUESTED 3Y: F’TGXK BRADY SANTA FE SPRINGS, CALIFORNIAQOIIO (2131 946.7103 A.L. Wisdom San Diego, CA 92104 3544 30th Street Suite ,200 Attention: Frank Brady Claim #: 88-07288 Insured: Casitas De La Costa :i.O.A. 2362-2374 Altisina Way Carlsbad, California INS 80624 August 25, 1988 INT3OD3CYiG.g In accordance with the rrcpzzt of Frank Brady, this report presents the results of our investigation of the 18-unit condominium complex located &'c 2362-2374 .Altisma Way, Carlsbad, California. The investigation w-z 2e~:orrned in order to determine the cause of cracks and uplif~/~ettlemont.in the concrete walkways and buildings. '. Conclusions reached are %a:;& ai*: ou; observations, manometer survey, subsurface investigjtien, mr experience with similar sites and conditions, an2 are in accordance with generally accepted professional principles t:-d 2ractice in the fields of soil mechanics and foundation cngicrering. No warranty is either expzsssex2 CL' implied. OL~VENHAIN ROAD t A Suzvey Cf T?,e Property e ... ' 8/25/88 INS 80624 Page 2 - LOCATION AND SZP'i DESCRIPTION The subject site is iocatec or. the north side of Altisma Way, approximately 200 meters southwest 05 the intersection of Altisma Way and Alicante Road, in the City cf Carlsbad, California (Figure 1). The site is located on 8 sl.92~3 Fad created by cut-and-fill grading operations. The slop :s 9rzdvai and descends toward the east. The site contains 4 inZ,ivituz.l 3-story buildings which are approximately seven years 015. Each building contains 4 or 5 condominium units. The grounc l2vi.l of the buildings contain a 2-car garage for each unit. The 2?8 and 3rd floors provide the living spaces. The 4 buildinccs 515 separated by concrete walkways and landscape bushes and trees. A jacuzzi is, located between the two northernmost units. Alonc; '-:>':% L:.~ .;'i=st and west sides of the site are asphalt driveways. The north, east, and west ?:-o?erty lines are bordered by retaining walls. The west rctaiL?i.ag wail is to 9 feet high, with the neighboring properr:! 12 -LO 15 feet above the subject site. The west retaining wll is j to 4 feet high, with the neighboring property 8 to 10 fset Oslow the . subject site. The north retaining wall supports the :north walrs 'of the 2, northern units. The retaining wall is Le 7 feet in height, with the adjoining neighboring property to "~i~t r.orth 6 to 7 feet below the subject site. . , ,. .. HAKlMlAN ENGINEERING 13003 LAG:&& COVi'i D SANTA FE SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA 90CI70 12131 940.7783 . 8/25/88 - INS 80624 Page 3 Drainage at the site is t.o:~iazd tne east and north. Drains were observed in the north siL? ,.*: _- rhe asphalt driveways, but appeared, not to be functioning. Era-'.- :A Were also observed in the lawn area around the site. As :ce?oz-ted by Mr. Frank Brady, a plumbing check on the jacuzzi .?.;?d +:hc: northern unit in Building No. 2374 revealed no leakage. Vegetation on the site COiSSiST:s c;f lawns, shrubs and mature trees. i ;;ea;?':' The scope of work cond~c*c.et. L~iri.?.g the investigation included i the following: 1. Visual observation of the czeas af distress and general site conditions. 2. Review of grading plans c?.t&irLe2 from the City of Carlsbad. 3. Subsurface excavation. 4. Laboratory testing of smp~~~.~. I 5. Manometer survey. 6. Engineering analysis. 7. Preparation of this report. i i i 8/25/88 INS 80624 Page 4 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Hairline to x-inch wide c3r;cl;s 2nd slight uplift in the concrete walkways near t'ce bss;r side of the jacuzzi. Two-inch to three-inch criclcs in zhe front concrete steps Of the northern unit in Builciag Nc. 2314. Hairline to 1/8-inch crzcc:;s i:: tt!~ exterior stucco walls Of the northern unit in Bcild:~?;; 50. 2374. Hairline to 1/8-inch cr6ck; i?. the zorthern exterior area of Building No. 2364. Three-inches to five-inci1es of subsidence of the asphalt driveway from the retainisg' wall i-.orth of the buildings. 1 We also examined the Fzti-ric'r of the northernmost unit of Building No. 2314, and fo~i~?. 2;atc:lcd cracks in the interior ceiling. A manometer survey was coP.d-cted' in, this unit. Results are included in the Appendix. c HAKIMIAN ENGINEERING 13003 L*iSri.:i CCiJ;7 o %?UA FE SPRINOS. CALIFORNIAP0670 b (2131 046.7783 . INS 80624 Page 5 8/25/88 - FIEL; ;d;q:yS';:I.G;AT'ION The field investigation ii:C..ilSS-3 examination of surficial conditions, manometer survey, GZ~ -te-." ..JL pit excavated adjacent to Building 2364, and two bGi::i-.c:? .~si.:+~g a 24 inch truck-mounted bucket auger drill rig. The 5~---.'-'- dAL..t2s aril test pit were continuous- ly logged and bulk and urarsturkd samples were collected for laboratory testing. . .. I -. Boring No. 1 was located near tLe Rortheast side of Building No. 2374. Total depth was' L? fee.<. A 7-inch 1 PVC sprinkler pipe was broken at a depth of 2 feet. Boring No. 2 was locate5 ? Li.;.t south of the north retaining wall and 7 feet east of +'- ill~ 2564 5Y.Fiding. Total depth was 13 feet. At a depth of approximreiy l;', a 1-inch copper water pipe broke during the excavation. A pluxber was contracted to repair the PVC pipe in B-1 and the coppr pipe in B-2. .. Test pit No. 1 was lochted near the northwest corner of building 2364. It was dug to de-rernine the nature of the footing support soils (total depth wU:i 3G iriches) . The boring and test pit logs are included as Places IT through IV. No groundwater was encountered 2nd no. caving oc.curred in the excavations. A manometer survey of .::?.s aor.&ernmost unit of Building No. 2374 is included as P1ate.V. -. 8/25/88 INS 80624 Page 7 During construction, fill was placed against the retaining wall north of the residentiai buildings to elevate the pad. The sunken asphalt in the northern porcions of the parking lots and the manometer survey of the northsrn unit of Building No. 2374, which illustrates the northerly si~pe of the residence floor, suggest the fill has settled alcng the northern perimeter of the site. Consolidation tests revesl t!---- .&cL the fill is slightly prone to consolidation, and has a ICW 1;~ medium potential for expansion. The medium expansion potential as measured in the upper portion of the fill (upper 6 feet). E:iptli?sive soil movement probably caused the cracking and uplifzs irl the walkway slabs between the buildings. The cracks an< scbsidi-nce of the asphalt, which decreased the effectiveness of th2 dreins, then allowed more water to enter the soil, acceleratin~ ,ch? consolidation of the fill. The relative compactions masured in our borings are generally above the minirnx:. required 90% amount, suggesting adequate initial compaction cf .2>s fill in the distressed area. The lower values in Boring 2 could be the result of the alterna- ting expansion and contracticn cf the soil, which can lower the relative compaction. HAKIMIAN ENGlNEERlNG 13001 L<C:.!,II- SC'J!<T + SANTA FE SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA 90070 0 1213) 046.7783 . 8/25/88 INS 80624 Page 8 .. REC0:LWS;IDATIOXS The potential for .future settlement of the northernmost distressed condominiums could be reduced by underpinning the footings in the area of distress isorthern side) with a friction pile grade beam system foun6e5 in stiff alluvium. The following values may be used for pile dssigr. pcrposes: Skin friction Minimum diameter Minimum embedment into stiif z?.luvium = 5 feet Lateral creep load = 1 kip/foot of = 500 psf = 18 inches penetration into fill. Fixity starts 3 feet below stiff alluvium surface Lateral bearing = 800 psf/foot up to 4000 psf max. After the foundations ~f riie bcildings have been stabilized by underpinning, the northern ?ortio~ of the building foundation should be jacked up. The -~oids created between the undistressed portions slab and the soil, subssqLent to lifting the footings, should be filled with low pressers grout, injected horizontally below the existing footings at 4 feet on center to refusal. The distressed slabs should be replaced with new slabs; refer to "Floor and Walkway Slabs Repair" CGK details. HAKIMIAN ENGINEERING I3OC3 UXNh COU!IT 0 5ANTA FE SPRINGS, CALIFORNIADOBlO (211)946-1783 . 0/25/00 INS 00624 Page 9 - Cosmetic Repair After the underpinning Is ccn?lcted, the structure will undergo readjustment of forces wLthin its members. This generally takes four to six months or even ZGX~. Therefore, patching of exterior stucco cracks, painticg s:>d otker cosmetic repairs should not be done until six months aft?:: conlpletion of the underpinning work. c. C6,a+Pn i: ..L.b I,. Floor and Walkway Slabs Repair The distressed floor and walkway slabs should be saw-cut, and about one foot of underlying fiil should be removed and hauled off the site. The removed soil shoula Se replaced by granular import, having an expansion index less than 20, and compacted to 90 percent relative compaction hSTM D1557-70. The new concrete slabs should be at least 4-inChEs :kick and reinforced with No. 3 bars at 16-inches on center, c~ch way. Floor slabs should be protected by a 6 mil plastic vapcr bzrrier placed under one-inch of wetted sand. Replacement of Asphalt/Concrete DzlvewaJ The distressed asphalt/consrete driveway 'should be removed and excavated to one and a half ~OOC beiow current grade and the resulting debris hauled off the site. Eackftll to 6 inches below the current grade with a gran;lzr 1:x~ort compacted to 90% relative ... . HAKlMlAN ENGINEERING 13003 LADYNA CO-n'r e SANTA FE SPRINGS, CALIFORNIAP0670 0 (2131 946.7703 . 5 8/25/88 INS 80624 Page 10 -. compaction per ASTM D1557-78. Plzce six inches of Crushed Aggregate Base (CAB) over the cozlacted subgrade, then re-pave with two inches of asphalt concxe;e. Northern Concrete Steps Replace the distressed ncrth entry step walls with engineered retaining walls. Backfill bekdeen the walls and the residence and compact to 90% relative compacti.o.1 pez ASTM D1557-78. Place a 4- inch thick concrete slab, reinfoxce2 with No. 3 bars spaced at 16- inch on center, both ways, over cwc-inch of sand over the compacted subgrade. Drainaqe Drains should be instali& so thar runoff is channeled away from the buildings and to the s-izee+ - guttelrs or to an appropriate disposal site. Gutters and non-sio%ibie drains should be provided and maintained so that water CaTl?.Gt pond against the northern wall. Review This office shall be proniptlli notified if any conditions substantially differing from L.L~+ Gisclosed by the test excava- tions are encountered during constzacticn. All repair work should be observed by a representative of rhis office to confirm compliance HAKlMlAN ENGINEERING 13003 L4QAR.A 2CCKi' * %UTA FE SPRINGS. CALIFORNIA00670 (2131 946.T783 . 8/25/08 c INS 80624 Page 11 with recommendations contained in this report and with local ordinances. \ This office should be notified at least 48 hours prior to any required review. If you have any questions rqarding the content of this report, please do not hesitate to call us. This opportunity to bs of ?rofessional service is greatly appreciated. Respectfully submitted, HAKIMIAN ENGINEERING, INC. )wee pL'&G-- Mike Mulhern Project Geologist MM: IC cc: Three to client APPEXBIX .. 2" asphalr VISUAL 32SbI<i!'h !ON " -I.r Fill - Silty ciry ZG clayey - silt. Clayey silt, pieces af weatherc rock. i" PVC 2ipe broken Silty clay, D~GZOUS ,sieces of rock. pieces of rock, x,,o;,ied color Siltier with 6.eptL End of borinq @ 13' No groundweter cncoantered. No caving. Backfilled to 3' in depth to fix PVC ;>ip. CI 0 4 0 U - reen. rown lark lrown ___. ;ray- .an - iackfilled to 2' ia de;3th to ,epair 1" copper 2ip. CI 4 0 U 0 - Teen Town Blacl Dark brow1 Brow] Gray tan - s1. moist mois. F I -+ I + I I 1 YY v W c r. Q 1 Y c INS 80624 .3 13.7 14.8 Direct Shear Direct shear tests were a6L-t :x ~;.~.;~sturbed 2.6 inch diameter sam2les to dstermine the stz..:: .-/._ - - -.>s soil. The samples were saturate2 under norzal 102.~ .... : ...,. ~ .: .-,,Ling. Shear loads were applied quickly in accords;.':; '...'::, :::::<: sTandard procedure for the consolidated undrained she:;: .: -:: ':.? results of these tests and their graFhic slots ai:-. :+ .,.:.',.~'. ,::. .-'-~r.tes IX and X. .. -, ~. . .. - ,. .~ .. ., ~. .7.-, .. PLATE VI INS 80624 Expansion Index In order to determine thc :-'-..- -s::,.::~.A Zxpansive character of the soil, a typical sample \.:is L Ji 5 -;~ . C - for expansion potential according to UBC Standard 25-2. .....L' zjesirnen was prepared at 50% saturation and placed undez 3 .-:~r-;,:.>. 1,szcl of 144 pounds per square foot and submerged in wcrc;:-. results are as follows: Sample Sampl? I:. ir;nsion Potential Location Descriptics Expansion B-1 @ 0-6' iFil:j _I? Mc3ium 5-1 @ 6-8' (Pill) ._ .. - -/ LOW . .~ ,~.,- - ri .~ ,~, .. ~ ... _. .. -i..:~.<::, "" .. "_ ,~. -. PLATE VI1 INS 80624 ! .. r PLATE VIII INS 80624 ., i PLATE IX PLATE ;X PLATE :X z 0 c I July 1. 1991 Joann Selleck Cozen and O'Comor 501 West Broadway San Diego, Ca 92101 Your File 31888 2362-2374 Altisma Way When the La Costa area vas developed Benton Engineering did all the soils work. Because of the size of the project these reports are kept in a separate file in our office by legal description. They are not filed with the subsequent projects that may be developed years 1ater.although they are used for reference. The permits indicate that the subject project was built on Lot 247 of La Costa Valley #5. and I enclose the foundation recommendations from that report. I do not know what the two handwritten notes imply, but they were made in another time by another Building Department. As you many lots and is 21 years old. can be of further assistance, please telephone me at ext 4332. I CARTER DARNELL, PLANCEE~~ cd c: Tony Mata ___" 2075 Las Palrnas Drive - Carlsbad, California 92009 - (679) 438-1 161 ~- __- July 9, 1991 JOANN SELLECK Benton 11/4/70 Lots 229 to 242, 244 to 250 vas an extra copy of the soils report in the old file. It ttached. Please return it after the trial. 2075 Las Palmas Drive .I Carisbad, California 32009 - (619) 438-1161 " . JOANN SELLECK Mr. Anthony Mata Lead Inspector, Building Department 2075 Las Palmas Carlsbad, California 92009 Li- 97 Re: Insured Casitas de La Costa CNA Claim No. : 82339012 Address f Loss : Carlsbad, CA 92008 2362-2374 Altisma Way Adv. Party Date f Loss KAPS Construction Our File No. October, 1987 31888 Dear Mr. Mata: Deposition Subpena, for which we thank you. It appears that Compex copied many of the documents in your offices. Missing plans, is any report from a soils engineer or any test results from the file however, although referred to in the architects refer to a report performed by Benton Engineering with regard to from soil inspection. The plans which you did produce appear to the soils however, such was not produced by your office. I would ask you to double check you files and determine whether or not such document exists, and if so, to please make it available to us. Earlier this year you provided documents in response to a Thank you for your attention to this matter. Very truly, COZEN and O'CONNOR JS: hm Enclosure (Prior Deposition S - I'\ ! 1 \ .. Ano*ut" OR r.nr wi,*o.I: "lO-.Wf" I" ."a -.... TfLflOU, NC CIS1 *"UO€' ! Joann Selleck, Esquire (61 9) 234-1 700 ~ Cozen 8 O'connor I I 401 "B" Street, Suite 1500 imo*%a*Q.L,90t CA 921 0' - 631 672 I Plaintiff ~ *Aucorco"" Superior Court of California, San Diego I i pos"r"cL~w 220 West Broadway j SI(llCT rDDR1:s i Pi~lf~'IIFFIPiTI'II0h'EF.. For Production of Gusiness Records i DEPOSITION SUBPENA San Dieuo. CP 97101 7A09 ! - I I DEFENDANTIRESPONDENT: KAP ~~~~l~~~~~t carp. I i Continental Casualty Company ~ THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, TO (name/: Custodian of Records City of Carlsbad, Building Department ?. YOU ARE ORDERED TD PRODUCE THE BUSINESS RECORDS described in item 3 as foliowr: Deoosn,on Dfflcer Insme!: , oare: April 22, 1991 Ttme: 9:30 a.m. 1 Aodrehc: 401 "B" Street, Suite 1500, San Diego, CA 92101 - - : Conrmue: on azacnmer.: 2. DISOBEDIENCE 0; TH!S SUBPENC MAY BE PUNISHE5 CS CONTEMFT BY TH!S COUK. YOU WILL AI50 BE LiABiE FOR THi SUM 0- ilVE HUNDRED DOLLARS AND ALL DAMAGES RESULTING FSOV YOUR FAILURE TO OBE?. Dale ISSUE:. 7 I JOANN SELLECK ... .. .. . ... ..... ... .. .. ... rr'Pi OF o*m, NAME, ISIGNI.1UCt 0' L€RSON ISSYIUG SYB*tl*k Ad,t rneys for Plaintiff nixei !See reverse io: pro01 cd servlce: i"0C.l' :ovrrc.. r. %t,,O.">> **. &oDmei DV hub. 9E: DEPOSITION SUBPEN.4-BUSINESS RECORDS coot c: ;Ir*'FIOC.DYII ?! 2C2f.21 Crmrncr LDOC ! 2 1560r 1362 IC . . +E:.: .'i: '% .-,. ..,., . '5" Continental Casualty Company v. KAP Development Corp. , Superior Court of State of California, County of San Diego, Case No. 631672 COZEN AND O'CONNOR San Diego, California 92101 401 "B" Street, Suite 1500 Telephone: (619) 234-1700 Attorney for Plaintiff Continental Casualty Company DECWTION OF SERVICE BY mIL service of the papers herein referred to, over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to the action: and I am employed in the County of San Diego, California, within which county the subject mailing occurred. My business address is 401 "B" Street, Suite 1500, San Diego, California 92101. I served the following document (s) : I, Hilda Misleh, declare: That I am, and was at the time of DEPOSITION SUBPOENA by placing a copy thereof in a separate envelope for each addressee named hereafter, addressed to each such addressee respectively as follows: - Custodian of Records, Building Department 2075 Las Palmas Carlsbad, California 92009 I then sealed each envelope and, with the postage thereon fully prepaid, deposited each in the Federal Express station at San Diego, California, on March 14, 1991. State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Execute6 on March 14, 1991. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the _I March 14, 1991 Mr. Anthony Mata Lead Inspector, Building Department 2075 Las Palmas Carlsbad, California 92009 -7 Re: Insured CNA Claim No. : Address/Loss : 2362-2374 Altisma Way Adv. Party Caps Construction Date/Loss Our File No. 31888 Casitas de La Costa 82339012 Carlsbad, CA 92008 October, 1987 4 Dear Mr. Mata: This firm represents CNA Insurance Company in connection with the above-referenced matter. I am in need of copies of the plans as well as other materials set forth in the enclosed Deposition Notice. We are willing to pay the cost of copying production of these items. and/or provide you with a copy service, if that will assist As you will notice, the Subpoena requires production of certain classes of documents. In lieu of appearing at the deposition, if you will agree to provide me with the requested copies of these documents in advance of the deposition, it will not be necessary for you to appear at the deposition, and I will then be able to make copies available to other counsel. Please call me if you have any questions. Thank you. Very truly, COZEN and O'CONNOR JS : hm Enclosure BY: UJOANN SELLECK Emercon, Inc. 621 South "8' Street Tustin, CA 96280 PERMIT NUMBER: CB891681 LAST INSPECTION: 3-29-90 ISSUE DATE: 12-26-69 PLEASE CALL FOR AN INSPECTION IF WORK IS COMPLETE RE BUILDING PERMIT EXPIRATION ADDRESS: 2362 AWisma Way Our records Indicate that your building permit will expire by limitation of time on September 25, 1990. The provisions of UBC, Section 303(d) state: 'EXPIRATION. Every permit issued by the Building Official under the provisions of this code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such permit, or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is commenced for a period of 180 days. Before such work can be recommenced, a new permit shall be first obtained so to do, and the fee therefore shall be one- half the amount required for the original plans and specifications for such work; and provided further that such suspension or abandonment has not exceeded one (a) year. Any permittee holding an unexpired permit may apply for an extension of the time within which he may commence work under that permit for good and satisfactory reasons. The Building Official may extend the time for action by the permittee for a period not exceeding 180 days upon written request by the permitee showing that circumstances beyond the control of the permitee have prevented action from being taken. No permit shall be extended more than once. In order to renew action on a permit after expiration, the permitee shall pay a new full permit fee. Please check below indicating your intentions and return this letter to us. - Project abandoned. New permit will be obtained prior to commencing work. - Maximum 180 day time extension requested. (please attach letter of explanation) If you have any questions, please contact this department at 43E3550. TONY MATA Principal Building Inspector 2075 Las Palmas Drive - Carlsbad. California 92009 (619) 438-1 161