The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2372 ALTISMA WAY; ; 80-405-A; PermitINSPECTION VALIDATED Q c i DECLARATIONS LENDER WORKER'S COMPENSATION OWNEWBUILDER CONTRACTOR -1 II in r L v c n c ' n z c " r I? i i 1 : QY 0: hC z c I m n m tL t I: i I Pinh',',4pplicant Gold - Temporary File White - Inspector Green - (1) Finance (2) Data Process, Yellow - Assessor VALIDATION Building , 80-405-2 Business 2372 Altisma Way A, B, C, &D Permit 0 Address where Business will be Conducted Name of Occupant C\JltA5 Lc L& GSth Phone 438 947b Address 01 Home Office 01 Occupant if diflerent from aboVe p, 0 . (3oX 'L I 9 8 a Cn A6 r-h Owner of Building &sitar JL 1/cI &Sf& Address P.a.6. L\46,a.~,~3L0Lp)hone 938 9976 9 LO( 7 onice ice 7 $ b 9 3 4 ~~ Type of Business 4 unit condo. Describe exacl use 01 ail portions of each building and lot f~ JtWiA%- I 4 4s Previous use of Building new .- Type of flammable or explosive liquids to be used, if any N#w I CertifY that I have read thn statements contained in this appiication: that they are true and correct, and that i make thls statement under penalty of perlury. Dated this I 3 day of E/C .*. , 19 6 I in the City of Carlsbad, Slate of California Slg"at"re Of FOR DEPARTMENTAL USE ONLY Prevention White - Bullding Dept. Yellow - Appllcanl Pink - Finance Gold - Flre Dept. INTERDEPARTMENTAL INFORMATION SHEET . DATE : i BUILDING DEPARTMENT BUILDING ADDRESS: I I1 ~ P~ANNING DEPARTMENT ZORE LOT SIZE , 9 $/ LOT WIDTH \\ -UNITS ALLOWED IS UNITS PROVIDED c~o~~ b ._ ne t'tment 'j 3 PROVIDED 1 I PARKING SPACES REQUIRED ' 1 % COVERAGE ALLOWED 1- PROVIDED BBILDING HEIGHT ALLOWED 35 ' PROVIDED 3 5' FRONT SETBACK: SIDE SETBACK: REAR SETBACK: 1 ALLOWED 1. 5 /, /b ' PROVIDED 51 IO ' \ INTRUSIoNS * Ir s&lm'+{td )i 6/l8,@ S~/+,~~S gu LcJstad.. PIW LANDSCAPE & IRRIGATION N COMMENTS : Srvj41(ifiw t~~s)Yds~4p( P%NS mh5f 1 EFNVIJIONMENTAL PROTECTION' REQ: BC4T 8 P COkSTlcL. a t? . (6 -)rL/?. ' ' , +-. ,. . IK OK TO FINAL IMPROVEMENTS GRADING PERMI ADDITIONAL COMMEN S PRI KKL I NG SYSTEM FIRE ALARMS FIR% HYDRANT _I r/ 1- h - OK TO FINAL DATE & h TO ISSUE( r fATER DEPARTMENT /REQUIREMENTS OF APPROPRIATE DISTRICTS MET DATE I .- I Robert L. Feffemdn 4433 Granger Street San Diega, CA 92107 II R EC Ef W ED APR 2 8 1991 1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD. CALIFORNIA 92008 October 7, 1980 Mr. Mike Kupfer KAP Development Corporation P. 0. Box 2148 Rancho Santa Fe Ca 1 if ornia (92067) Re: Plan Check #80-405 / 2372 Altisma Way In answer to your letter of October 2, 1980, an extetision has been granted to January 25th, 1981. No further extension will be granted. MAqTTIN ORENYAK\ Building Official MO/ 9 1 Mike Kupfpr, P'resident Contracterg Lic. No. 345844 Registered C. E. 12201 October 2, 1980 Mr. Martin Orenyak Building Official City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 Ref: @/C #80405 Casitas de la Costa P.O. Box 2148 16509 Zumaque Drive Rancho Santa Fe, Ca. 92067 (714) 756-2934 (714) 562-4411 Dear Mr. Orenyak: Thank you for your letter of September 29 regarding Plan Check Expiration. We hereby request a 90-day extension on our plan check. Be- cause of very unfavorable money situation for construction funds at present, we have not yet been able to obtain a loan commitment. We have contacted many lenders, but find that most of them are not committing funds for constructions at the present time. We are currently working with three lenders and hope that within the next 30 to 60 days we will receive a commitment for construction funds on Casitas de la Costa. We would appreciate the consideration of the Carlsbad Build- ing Department in granting us a 90-day extension for the cir- cumstances discuss above. Sincerely yours, Mike ryyRw Kupfer President -@ N .? 0 n .. .. I I. . ,A \' 1 - I il . project NO. 70-5-1 1 D - 'Ra:,cho La Costa ,- 1. Test Number 23Y to 270, inclusive 271 to 307, inclusive 308 to 344, inclusive 345 to 370, inclusive 371 to 406, inclusive 407 to 463, inclusive 464 to 504, inclusive 505 to 51 1, inclusive -2- November 4, 1970 Week Ending August 22, 1970 August 29, 1970 September 5, 1970 September 12, 1970 September 19, 1970 September 26, ,1970 October 3, 1970 October 10, 1970 Soft clay soils, soft alluvial deposits, and existing filled ground forming the reservoir at the eosterly end of the site were removed and compacted filled ground was placed on firm natural soils suitable for structural support. The final results of tests and observotions indicate that the compacted filled ground has been placed at 90 percent of the maximum dry density or greater. It has been determined that the fill moterials, compacted to 90 percent of the maximum dry density, have a safe bearing value of at least 2500 pounds per square foot far one foot wide continuous footings founded at a min- imum depth and placed five feet or more inside the top of compacted filled ground slopes. If footings are placed closer to the exposed slopes than 5 feet inside the top of compacted filled ground slopes, these should be deepened one foot below a 1 1/2 horizontal to 1 vertical line projected outward and downward from a point 5 feet horizontally inside the top of compacted filled ground slopes. Tests indicate that the compacted filled ground is adequate to satisfactorily support the proposed wood frame dwellings without detrimental settlements. ' were placed in the compacted fill areas and also exist in the upper three feet below finished grade in certoin cut areas. Critical expansive clay soil conditions were ' e * t in the upper three feet below finished grade on the following lots: Type A -235 to 239, - inclusive, and 241 t finished grade on the following lots: 'Type B p"4 Lots 230: 233, 234, 240, and 250. f- Marginally expansive clay soil conditions were e to exist in the upper three feet below L- dJ 'It is recommended that the following special design and precautions be taken for the houses to be constructed on the above lots: Type A Lots b \"b Y. Avoid the use of isolated interior piers. Use continuous footings throughout, and place these at a minimum depth of two feet below the lowest adjacent exterior final ground surface. Reinforce and interconnect continuously with steel bars all interior and exterior footings with one #5 bar at 3 inches above the bottom of the footings 2- I__ P 2. . - and one 85 bar placed 1 1/2 inches below the top of the stems of the footings. Up to 2 feet of cloy fill was observed to be deposited on lot 229 and o portion of Lot 230 in July 1971 without inspection or testing by Benton Engincering, Inc. (Note added \ 2-11-72). \ - c/-/-->/7 /-~- - 7- -- / ------ - -3- , November 4, 1970 L, 3. Exercise every effort to ossure thot thr: soil under the foundations and slabs has a uniform moisture content, 1 percent to 3 percent greater thon optimum throughout the top 3 feet below finished grade at the time of placing founda- tions and slabs. Use raised wooden floors thot span between continuous footings, or use all concrete slabs with 6 x 6 - 10/10 welded wire fabric ond provide a minimum should be provided in the sand layer 2 inches below slabs under living areas. I ,' I 4. .- of 4 inches of clean sand beneoth 011 concrete slobs. A moisture barrier * 5. Separate gorage slabs from perimeter footings by o 1/2 inch thickness of con- struction felt or equivalent, to allow independent movement of garage slabs relative to perimeter footings. * 6. Provide positive drainage away from all perimeter footings to a horizontal 1 distance of at least 6 feet outside the house walls. Type B Lots Those lots listed as Type B lots should follow all the above-listed recommendations with the two following exceptions: 1. The continuous footings moy be ploced at a minimum depth of 18 inches below the lowest adjacent exterior final ground surface rather than the two feet recommended for Type A lots. Single #4 bars placed as directed (above) near tops and bottoms of all interior and exterior footings moy lm substituted for the #5 bors recommended for Type A lots. 2. Recommendations 3 to 6, inclusive, m listed for Type A lots, are applicable to the Type B lots also. .Only nonexponsive soil conditions were observed in the upper three feet on Lot 22Tand therefore specially designed footings and slabs will not be required on this lot. - -. Respectfully submitted, ~~ BENTON ENGINEERING, INC. Reviewed li' y '\iJ-i-(@x- "7 . h>i;H.%nton, Civil Eng'neer BY -Zp L?&&n&& Distr: (4) Addressee R. C. Remer (2) Rancho La Costa, Inc. (1) Rick Engineering Compony (2) Son Diego County Building Inspection, Attention: Mr. Burton L. Kramer /--- --, -------.. Up to 2 feet of clay fill was observed to be deposited on Lot 229 and a portion of Lot 230 in July 1971 without inspection or testing by Benton Engineering, Inc. (Note added * / . 2-11-72)- -_r---- :7<Nc. ~. ----- \- I %. 1. .. ' 1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 I4 RESIDENTIAL VALUATION CHART Living Area KSYP X / Garage Area 2/33 X Covered Porch X Covered Patio \ X Balconies /?A X Each Bathroom over 3 X Each Fireplace over 2 X Retaining Walls X Air Conditioning X . :. .. . . .. $ 38.00 -$ J/O. 976,' 9.00 /?/82v 4.00 4.00 6.50 /, AYtY 1,800.00 1,400 - 00 7.50 2.25 Total Valuation S=23< yd2.H Plan Check Fee (32% ci bldg. permit' fee .- - is Cc-rcrriniums 65%) Total fees . .. TOTAL 'iXZZtO;.) .. FEE 4 - s1.00 to $.%.3.C? s501.00 ts 32,,33mo :.. $2,ObX.O0 to $5.C.co0.oo - $5.00 $5.00 for the first $5OO.OO'plup $1.00 for ezd additional $100.00 or fmc- tion thereof, to and including $2,000. S20.00. for the first $2,000.00 plus $4.00 for each adJitiona1 $1,000.00 or fraction thermf, :o and including sn_s ooo.no ._., ~. .- $2SsO0l.C0 ta $S0.000.00 SllPOO for the first $15,000.00 plus $3.00 for each additional $1.000.00 or fraction thereof. 'to and including $.5Q.OOl.C0 5 .SXO,OOO.OO $167.00 for the first $50,000.00 plus .. - . $2.00 for exh ailditional $3.000.00 or fraction thneof, to and including . . $50.000.00 . ._. .. . ' ' 5100.000.00 . ~~.. . ~~ ~ $XN;>::2Za 5550.000.00 $051.00 for the first $100.000.00 phs $1.50 for each xldifion;ll $1,000.00 .- -. or fraction thcreoF, to and including Expirxli6n of I'hn Check. .Applications for which no permit i: 1 within 13 days followinn th: datc of.apDlic~lion'sha11 cxoirc bk $so0.~l~.00 - .. - -_ . _. .. - -. . . _. __ .. 7initz:ion an.' plrnr subrnitlcd forchcckiiig m:iy th&calter bc rctu;nrd I; UIC npjdican: or d:st:oycd by Ihc UuilZins Officid. Ttic Iiiiildiii~: OIficia: ma cxtcrtd ::I: time for action by th: applicarit for 3 pcriod no1 cxcccdirrp 1Ldd;iys upon wriftm rcqucr: hy thcapplicanr sliowii~g tlmt circiiiiistancc! bcyorid thc conirol OC Ihc api>lic;lnt II;IVC prcvcnrcd aclioii from bring Iakcn. In ordcr to rcncw aclion OII an 3pplication after expiration, [tic ap. plicantshxll rcsubod ~rlans JII~ pay3 IICW plniichcuk fce. . ... (d) ltrirtipwtii>n Fee. Tlicfce for csch rsinsocclion s11a11 bcJ 10.00. .- ._ .. i. .. .- : - . . .. . . .. --A- ;\ >, i- i i I--....- , __ I ! $ is i '+ i.,, I- 1 TltU a4-P / mn ROBERT L. FLFFLRMAN ?ILC no 8aY J R J/ CTRUCTURAL LNOINCCR UM DIW. CALI-UIA cu. m L rrJ c . - a/' 0 VILC UO Bo 31 oLn ROBERT L. FLFFERMAN 8rRUCTVRAL ENIOINCCR MU DIW. CALICOIUIA cIum 07- L/ TI d = 2393 ’I ?&Jy M ROBERT L. FLFFLRYAN FILL Dm 863J) STRUCTURAL LNOINLLR 8AN DICW. CALICOUIA CAU NO / VlLC M mn ROBERT L. FCFFERMAN NUUCTURAL LNOINCLU MU DICU). CALI-UIA PIY w A-l.3 TITU I ROBERT L. FLFFERMAN VILE m STRUCTURAL CNQINLCR MDI muo. CALIPORNIA mum R-I/ 6/ cf L w i,i’ - DI ROBERT L. FEFFERMAN .ILL no , BJ STRUCTURAL CNOINCLR UIM DI-. CALI?OIMIA P4.m D TITIS , /To@/ , M de L7 .-,h ROBERT L. FEFFERMAN STRUCTURAL ENQ~NLLR SAY miam. CALIIOIMIA FILE YO TIN &-QUA- I' ..... ~~ .... . . . .. . . . ..... ~.. ...... .~ ...... ... ..... ....... -. :. FILL NO D*R AN9# /FR/ ROBERT L. FEFFERMAN STRUCTURAL ENGINEER SA* 01190. CALlrOlNIA ,Io. . , ,' r? / ,! ,-.e ...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R/f?/A.-#,.. .~~.. .... . . . . . . . . . . TITLL. ... iJ (' i - .- &,A:-. :: .;;i IILEMO- ' . DA ROBERT L. FEFFERMAN s9 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER 8AW D1.00. CALlIOlUIA PAOC m . .~ i . .. ...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... @/52)L- rc Tint ...... ..... /' . ... ...... ........ ?J I ..... . . .. .. . . . . ... . . .~ ~... ....... ~ ..~.... .....