HomeMy WebLinkAbout2414 LA TINADA CT; ; CB052059; PermitCity of Carlsbad
i 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008
04 -20-20 06 Residential Permit Permit No: CB052059
Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725
Job Address:
Permit Type:
Parcel No:
Valuation:
Occupancy Group:
# Dwelling Units:
Bedrooms:
Project Title:
2414 LA TINADA CT CBAD
RESDNTL Sub Type: RAD
2550700200 Lot #: 0
$147,180.00 Construction Type: VN
Reference #:
0 Structure Type:
0 Bathrooms: 0
MARTIN RES 1338 SF 1ST AND 2ND
STORY ADDITION
Status: ISSUED
Applied: 06/02/2005
Entered By: KG
Plan Approved: 01/20/2006
Issued: 01/20/2006
Inspect Area:
Orig PC#:
Plan Check#:
Applicant: Owner:
MARTIN BRIAN C&KAREN B MARTIN BRIAN C&KAREN B
2414 LA TINADA CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
/7
Building Permit ' $694.40 Meter Size ..J 4( '.. . Add'I Building Permit Fee - $0.00 Add'I Recl. Water Con, Fee s $0.00
Plan Check $451361 Meter Fee '- $0.00
Add'I Plan Check Fee $O.O0?:t...SDCWA Fee '\ \ $0.00
Plan Check Discount $0.00 '1CFD Payàff Fee \ -,j $0.00
Strong Motion Fee $14.72 PFF(3105540) ', '- . $0.00
Park in Lieu Fee $0.00- -PFF (4305540), --2' \ '' .' i $0.00
Park Fee $0.00'.(z License Tax (31041 93) \ /" $0.00
LFM Fee . $0.00-.License-Tax (4304193) . - - $0.00
Bridge Fee $000 Traffic Impact Feb(3105541)' --- $0.00
Other Bridge Fee $0.00 Traffic Impact Fee (4305541) , $0.00
BTD #2 Fee .$0.00\ Sidewalk Fee '-'- $0.00
BTD #3 Fee $0.00 PLUMBING TOTAL
--. $83.00
Renewal Fee $0.00 \ ELECTRlCALTOTAt\ $20.00
Add'I Renewal Fee $0.00. MECHANICAL, 1/ / $46.00
Other Building Fee $0.00 \Housing Impact Fee
- / $0.00
Pot. Water Con. Fee $0.00. Housing lnLiéuEee ' $0.00
Meter Size Housing Credit Fee $0.00
Add'I Pot. Water Con. Feb - $0.00 - Master Drainage Fee, / $0.00
Red. Water Con. Fee $0.00'NCOSewer Fee ,/ c --. $0.00
Additional Fees - .- / $0.00
-.-TOTAL PERMIT
FEES \,\ J / $1,309.48
'\ N \;
Total Fees: $1,309.48 Total Payments To!Date: ,$1,309.48 Balance Due: $0.00
Z /
FINAL APP
Inspector: Date: Clearance:
NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the imposition of fees, edications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively
referred to as fees/exactions." You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must
follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for
processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack,
review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition.
You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity
changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project. NOR DOES IT APPLY to any
fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired,
2414 LA TINADA CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
tic
- -
PERMIT APPLICATION
O CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT -
1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad CA 2OQ8
&.
c' 24ik I
Address (include Bldg/Suite #) ,. Bu ness Name (at this addres'
: f4i'41 iái3t
Legal Description Lot No. Subdivision Name/Number Unit No.
Assessors Parcel # Existing Use
C710 —ô Z 1N; frn1t ( Description of Work SQ. Ft. # of Storl 2
tk &cn A-i m;/k -0A,r6M1kDWTAA
't"-Yt iie S01V) Gev CA
Name Address - C ty Stde/Zlp
ALiC U ner
WII '&244: L#LTtMAO, (1' ASE Name Address City State/Zip
T
Atc AAt IA4 iA T(vt4, (Yr.
FOR OFFICE USE
PLAN CHECK NO
EST. VAL.
Plan Ck. Deposit _
Validated By
Date
COP 451.36
Phase No. Total # of units
Pgps#d Use cI
#01 BedroYns40, 1) Aofathrooms
4(iotaC)
Telephone #
Telephone
T
Name •, . Address . City State/Zip-'- Telephone #
CACJR COM E -• - __
(Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance,
also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law [Chapter 9, commending with
Section 7000 of. Division. 3 of the Business and Professions Code] or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by
any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant 6'a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars [$500]).
Name Address City State/Zip Telephone #
State License # Licnse Class City Business License #
Designer Name Address City State/Zip Telephone #
State License #
WORkER'S COMP
• i.i__________ __________ Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations:
Cl I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self,lnsure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work
for which this permit is issued. . . • .• -
El, I have and will maintain worker's compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My
worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are:
-Insutonce Company Policy No. Expiration Date____________________________ (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($100] OR LESS)
)l CERTIFICATE '60 EXEMPTION: :1 certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to
become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California.
WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand
dollars($100,000), in addition to the cost of! comilensellon, damages are provided for In Section 3706 of the Labor Code, interest and attorney') es,
SIGNATURE DATE___________________
OWNFR U1LDER FCM Aff) ''"71 I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's Lic nse Law for the following reason:
o I,- as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will d the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044,
Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or Improves thereon, and who does such work himself or
through his own employees, provided.that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of
completion, theowner-bullder will have the burden of proving that he'did not build or improve for the purpose of sale).
I, as owner of the property, am exciusiveiycontraèting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's
License Law does not apply to an owner of property, who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's
, License Law). , •
•:
0 • lam exempt under Section • Business and Professions Code for this reason:
I personally plan'to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. 0 YES 0 NO
I (have/have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work.
I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (Include name / address / phone number / contractors license number):
4, • i'plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone number/
/ontractors license number):
' 5. I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the,foliowing persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type of work):
PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE 4i.s c.. DATE
WHITE: File
•
YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance
PERMIT APPLICATION
CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT
1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad CA 92008
Page 2 of 2
[COMPLETE 'THIS SECTION FORNONRESlDENflACBUILOING'PERMITSONLy I
Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration for or risk management and prevention program under
Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? U YES El NO
Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? 0 YES 0 NO
Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the Outer boundary of a school site? 0 YES 0 NO
IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE
REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT.
L87—CONSTRUCTION'LENDINO-AGEItCY
I hereby affirm that there Is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit Is Issued (Sec. 3097(l) Civil Code).
LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS
19APUCANTCER11FIeATION'_ -.
I certify that I have read the application and state that the above Information Is correct and that the Information on the plans Is accurate. I agree to comply with all City
ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the City of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection
purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGEMENTS, COSTS AND
EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT.
OSHA: An OSHA permit Is required for excavations of 50" deep and demolition or construction of structures Over 3 stories In height
EXPIRATION: Every permit Issued by the building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized
by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such permit or If the building or work authorized by such permit Is suspended or abandoned at any time after
the work is commenced for a period of 180 days (Section 106.4.4 Uniform Building Code).
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE K.
WHITE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance
Ins'ection List
Permit#: CB052059 Type: RESDNTL RAD MARTIN RES 1338 SF 1ST AND 2ND
STORY ADDITION
Date Inspection Item Inspector Act Comments
12/22/2006 89 Final Combo . RI
12/22/2006 89 Final Combo JM Fl
12/08/2006 89 Final Combo JM CO GARAGE DOOR CLOSER T&P
07/14/2006.22 Sewer/Water Service JM AP
06/02/2006 17 Interior Lath/Drywall JM AP
06/02/2006 18 ExteriorLath/Drywall . JM CO CAULK PENETRATIONS
05/25/2006 16 Insulation -JM AP
05/23/2006 84 Rough Combo JM AP LIST
05/22/2006 84 Rough Combo PC CA
05/04/2006 13 Shear Panels/HD's . JM. AP
04/25/2006 15 Roof/Reroof JM AP OK TO COVER
02/01/2006 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers JM AP OK TO POUR ADD ON & POST
• FOOTINGS
01/31/2006 21 Underground/Under Floor JM AP
. • •
Tuesday, December 26, 2006 Page 1 of 1
City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request
For: 12/22/2006
Inspector Assignment: JM Permit# CB052059
Title: MARTIN RES 1338 SF 1ST AND 2ND
Description: STORY ADDITION
Type: RESDNTL Sub Type: RAD
Job Address: 2414 LA TINADA CT
Suite: Lot 0
Location:
APPLICANT MARTIN BRIAN C&KAREN B
Owner: MARTIN BRIAN C&KAREN B
Remarks:
Total Time:
CD Description Act Comment
19 Final Structural 1T1
29 Final Plumbing
39. Final Electrical
49 Final Mechanical -
Phone: 7608153524
Inspector:
Requested By: CHRIS
Entered By: CHRISTINE
Comments/Notices/Holds
Associated PCRs/CVs Original PC#
Inspection History
Date Description Act lnsp Comments
12/08/2006 89 Final Combo CO JM GARAGE DOOR CLOSER T&P
07/14/2006 22 Sewer/Water Service AP JM
06/02/2006 17 Interior Lath/Drywall AP JM
06/02/2006 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall CO JM CAULK PENETRATIONS
05/25/2006 16 Insulation AP JM
05/23/2006 84 Rough Combo AP JM LIST
05/22/2006 84 Rough Combo CA PC
05/04/2006 13 Shear Panels/HD's AP JM
04/25/2006 15 Roof/Reroof AP JM OK TO COVER
02/01/2006 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers AP JM OK TO POUR ADD ON & POST FOOTINGS
01/31/2006 21 Underground/Under Floor AP JM
o / eaq
- aa
OrJqo('
&9- (69) :ej;wIsed
£9L??P2 (6 L9) :euoqdaiej
POL6 •V3 obBIJ ues
anuaAV ARAA,un VESC'
I Al L
1001A 9UU33MI9r3 9NOM CL9Z86I9 XVJ O:t NOW 90/CT>O
03/01/06 WED 19:57 FAX 6192826723 WONG ENGINEERING
cvii
l[•]1J 3534 University Avenue
I I San Diego, CA. 92104 • Telephone: (619) 282-2767
____________ .Facsimile: (619)282-6723
ENGINEERS
FIELD REVISION 3-1-06
ADD STIFFENER ELEMENT TOFLOOR BEAMS
REMODEL/ADDITION
MARTIN RESIDENCE
2414 LA TINADA COURT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
SIMP. SDS 1104 1/2 SCREW - 12" 0G.. TOP AND BOTTOM
Job No. 604-Z
Date 3-1-06
Sheet 1 of 1
)" LONG X 3/8" X 9"
rM A56) STEEL PLATE
SIM. SDS 1f4X6 SCREWS @
8" OC., TOP AND BOTTOM
./2" P1RRALLAM BEAM
SECTION
SIMP. SDS 1/4X6 SCREWS; @ 4 8' 0G., TOP AND BOTTOM
/ (ASTM A36) STEEL PLATE
16'-O" LONG X 3/8" X9"
1/4"
J- 5/16" DIA. HOLES (TYP.)
I Ii
1114"—J f4. 4". ,V " •" 4" 4" 4"
.
4"
:i....
411
.. '
STIFFENER PLATE DETAIL (FO-12&FB1S) (N.T.S.)
' pcM?5
ESGII Corporation
In artnersIiip ñtfi çovernmentforBui(iing Safety
DATE: 10/13/05 0
cLIcANT
JURISDICTION'. City of Carlsbad U PLAN REVIEWER
U FILE PLAN CHECVNt' 05-2059 SET: II
PRfUJECT ADDRESS: 2414 La' Tinada Court
'
PROJECT NAME: Martin. Residence Remodel & Addition
LI The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply
with the jurisdiction's building codes.
The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes
when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff.
LI The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list
and should be corrected and resubñiitted for a complete recheck.
LI The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil
Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck.
LII The applicant's copy of the check 'list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant'
contact person.
fl The applicant's copy of the checklist has been sent to:
Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
Lii Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
Person contacted:
'
Telephone #:
Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #:
Mail Telephone Fax In Person
REMARKS: Please add smoke detector at access of the study room at first floor if not already existing.
-
By: David Yao Enclosures:
Esgil Corporation
[] GA El MB El EJ 0 0 PC 10/6 ' trnsmti.dot
9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Dieg, California 92123 4 (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576
'i
EsGil Corporation
In (Partnership with çovernmentforui(&ng Safety
i:,
DATE: 6/15/05
JURISDICTION: City of Carlsbad
PLAN CHECK NO.: 05-2059
U A ICANT
6,1 JURIS.
U P N REVIEWER
U FILE
SET:I
PROJECT ADDRESS: 2414 La Tiñada Court
PROJECT NAME: Martin Residence Remodel & Addition
H The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply
with the jurisdiction's building codes.
H The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes
when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff.
H The pins transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list
and shOuld be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck.
The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil
Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck.
H Theapplicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant
contact person.
The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to:
Robert Wong 3534 University Ave. San Diego, CA 92104
H Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
Person contacted: Robert Wong Telephone #: (619)282-2767
Date ontacted:(fcfo (by:i_) Fax #: (&fq ) 292.c2Z3
Mail ..7TeIephone— Fax.- In Person
H REMARKS:
'. By: Dávid.Yao Enclosures:
Esgil Corporation
El GA El MB El EJ El PC 6I7 trnsmtl.dot
9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576
City of Carlsbad 05-2059
6/15/05
PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST
SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES
PLAN CHECK NO.: 05-2059 JURISDICTION: City of Carlsbad
PROJECT ADDRESS: 2414 La Tinada Court
a.
FLOOR AREA:
Living addition 1338 sf
REMARKS:
DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY
JURISDICTION:
DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW
COMPLETED: 6/15/05
FOREWORD (PLEASE READ)
STORIES: 2
HEIGHT:
DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY
ESGIL CORPORATION: 6/7
PLAN REVIEWER: David Yao
This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code,
Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws
regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review
is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections
based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire
Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to
the issuance of a building permit.
Present California law mandates that residential construction comply with the 2001 edition of
the California Building Code (Title 24), which adopts the following model codes: 1997 UBC,
2000 UPC, 2000 UMC and 1999 NEC (all effective 11/1/02).
The above regulations apply to residential construction, regardless of the code editions adopted
byordinancé.
The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied
before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3,
1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any
state, county or city law.
To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each
correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet number, specification section, etc.
Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans.
City of Carlsbad 05-2059
6/15/05
. PLANS
Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction
list. Submit three sets.of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for
residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one
of two ways:
Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of
Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-
2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning,
Engineering and Fire Departments.
Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320
Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all
remaining setsof plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building
Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments.
NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by
the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is
complete.
1. Clearly dimension building setbacks from property lines, street centerlines, and
from all adjacent buildings and structures on the site plan. Section 106.3.3.
. FIRE PROTECTION
2. Show locations of permanently wired smoke detectors with battery backup:
Inside existing master bedroom.
Centrally located in corridor or area giving access to new bedroom 2,3,4,5
at upper floor and existing study at first floor sleeping rooms.
3. When the valuation of a room addition or repair exceeds $1,000, or when
sleeping rooms are created, smoke detectors shall be provided per the above,
except that smoke detectors added at existing construction need only be battery
powered. Section 310.9.1.2.
. ROOFING
4. Specify on the plans the following information for the roof materials, per Section
106.3.3:
Manufacturer's name.
- Product name/number.
ICBO approval number, or equal.
5. Provide skylight details to show compliance with Sections 2409 and 2603, or
specify on the plans the following information for the skylight(s), per Section
106.3.3:
Manufacturer's name.
Model name/number.
ICBO approval number, or equal.
City of Carlsbad 05-2059
6/15/05
6. Show the required ventilation for attics. The minimum vent area is 1/150 of attic
area (or 1/300 of attic area if at least 50% of the required vent is at least 3 feet
above eave vents or cornice vents). Show area required and area provided.
Section 1505.3.
7. Where eave vents are installed, insulation shall not block the free flow of air. A
minimum of 1" of air space shall be provided between the insulation and the roof
sheathing. To accommodate the thickness of insulation plus the required 1"
clearance, member-sizes may have to be increased for rafter-ceiling joists.
Section 1505.3.
8. Note on the plans:, "Attic ventilation openings shall be covered with
corrosion-resistant metal mesh with mesh openings of 1/4-inch in dimension."
Section 1505.3:
. FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS
9. Provide a copy of the project soil report prepared by a California licensed
architect or civil engineer. The report shall include foundation design
recommendations based on the engineer's findings and shall comply with UBC
Section 1804. (City policy)
10. In Seismic Zone 4, each site shall be assigned a near-source factor. Identify this
value in the soils report and on the plans. Section 1629.4.2.
11. Investigate the potential for seismically induced soil liquefaction and soil
instability in Seismic Zones 3 and 4. This does not apply to detached, single-
story dwellings. Section 1804.5
12. Note on the plan the soils classification, whether or not the soil is expansive and
note the allowable bearing value. Section 106.3.3.
13. -The soils engineer recommended that he/she review the foundation excavations.
Note on the foundation plan that "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building
Department foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the building
official in writing that:
The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report,
The utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and
The foundation excavations, the soils expansive characteristics and
bearing capacity conform to the soils report."
14. PrOvide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan,
grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been
determined that the recommendations in the soils report are properly
incorporated into the construction documents (when required by the soil report).
City of Carlsbad 05-2059
6/15/05
Note on plans that surface water will drain away from building and show drainage
pattern. Section 1804.7.
Specify size, l.C.B.O: number and manufacturer of power driven pins, expansion
anchors or epoxy anchors. Show edge and end distances and spacing. Section
106.3.3.
If required, show size, embedment and location of hold down anchors on
foundation plan. Section 106.3.3.
If hold downs are required, note on plan that hold down anchors must be tied in
place prior to foundation inspection. Section 108.5.2.
FRAMING
Please provide evidence that the engineer-of-record (or architect) has reviewed
the truss calculation package prepared by others (i.e., a "review" stamp on the
truss calculations or letter). Section 106.3.4.1.
Provide calculations for lateral loads, shear panels, shear transfer and related.
Section 106.3.3. (no lateral force analysis for the project was provided)
Specify nail size and spacing for all shear walls. Indicate required blocking.
Maintain maximum diaphragm dimension ratios. Sections 2315 and 2513.
In Seismic Zone 4, aspect ratios are limited to 2:1 for wood shear panels. Table
23-ll-G.
In Seismic Zones 3 and 4, where allowable shear values exceed 350 plf in wood
structural panel shear walls, foundation sill plates and all framing members
receiving edge nailing from abutting panels shall not be less than a single 3"
nominal member. In -shear walls where the total wall design shear does not
exceed 600 plf, a single 2" nominal sill plate may be used, provided the anchor
bolts are designed for a load capacity of 50% or less of the allowable capacity.
Plywood joint and sill plate nailing shall be staggered in all cases. Table 23-I1-I-
1, footnote 3.
Detail truss layout for 30" x 30" attic access, if required for equipment in the attic
and detail 30" x 30" clearance through truss webs.
ELECTRICAL (NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE)
Show on the plan the amperage of the electrical service, the location of the
service panel and the location of any sub-panels. If service is over 200 amps,
submit single line diagram, panel schedule and load calculations.
Note on the plans that receptacle outlet locations will comply with NEC Art.
210-52(a).
City of Carlsbad 05-2059'
6/15/05
ENERGY CONSERVATION
Note on the plans "The manufactured windows shall have a label attached
certified bythe'National Fenestration Rating Council (NFRC) and showing
compliance with the energy calculations."
. MISCELLANEOUS
To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each
correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number,
calculation page, etc.
Pleaseindicatehere if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a
result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly
describe them and where they are located in the plans.
Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list?
Please indicate:
Yes L3 No i:i
30. The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320
Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of
858/560-1468, to .perform the plan review for your project. If you have any
questions regarding these plan review items, please contact David Yao at Esgil
Corporation. Thank you.
City of Carlsbad 05-2059
6/15/05
VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE
JURISDICTION: City.of Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 05-2059
PREPARED BY: DavidYao V DATE: 6/15/05
BUILDING ADDRESS: 2414 La Tinada Court
BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R3/U1 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN
BUILDING
PORTION
AREA
(Sq. Ft.)
Valuation
Multiplier
Reg.
Mod.
VALUE ($)
living 1338 per City 147,180
Air Conditioning
Fire Sprinklers
TOTAL VALUE 147,180
Jurisdiction Code ICb IBY Ordinance
Bldg. Permit Fee by Ordinance
$694.401
Plan check Fee by Ordinance I $451.361
Type of Review: Complete Review Structural Only
[1 Other E Repetitive Fee - * Repeats. V Hourly Hour
Esgil Plan Review Fee
V
I $388.86
Comments: V
Sheet 1 of 1
macvalue.doc
Carlsbad
/ . . BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
DATE: (0 ( LANCHECK NO.: GB o5
BUILDING ADDRESS: /((
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 4-1-AJ- /33(
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: z,S1 olb o
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
APPROVAL DENIAL
The item you have submitted for review has been Please see the attached report of deficiencies approved. . The approval is based on plans, marked with 0. Make necessary corrections to plans information and/or specifications provided in your or specifications for compliance with applicable submittal: therefore any changes to these items after codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or this date, including field modifications, must be specifications to this office for review. reviewed by this office to insure continued
conformance with applicable codes. Please review
carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply
with instructions in this report -can result in
suspension of permit to build.
Li A Right-of-Way permit is required prior to
construction of the following improvements:
((L AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE BUILDING PERMIT: /o
By:
EST. VALUE: 'V I,!
By: Date:
By: Date:
By: Date:
ATTACHMENTS
Ji Dedication Application
Li Dedication Checklist
U Improvement Application
Li Improvement Checklist
Li Neighborhood lmprovefnent Agreement
El Grading Permit Application
Lii Grading Submittal Checklist -
Ui Right-of-Way Permit Application
Right-of-Way Permit Submittal Checklist
and Information Sheet
ENGINEERING DEPT. CONTACT PERSON
Name: KATHLEEN M. FARMER
City of Carlsbad
Address: 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008
Phone: (760) 602-2741
CFD INFORMATION
Parcel Map No:
Lots:
Recordation:
Carlsbad Tract:
CA 92001-7314 0 (760) 602-2720 • FAX (760) 602R2
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
SITE PLAN
2ND 3RD
El 1. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show:
,ANorth Arrow ,-ight-of-Way Width & Adjacent Streets
Existing & Proposed Structures -'3~ Driveway widths
,7 9/Existing Street Improvements X
.
J,-'Existing orproposed sewer lateral
Property Lines (show all dimension 1. Existing or proposed water service
7 E' Easements J. Existing or proposed irrigation service
EJ D/2.. Show on site plan:
A. Drainage Patterns
Building, pad surface drainage must maintain a minimum slope of one
percent towards an adjoining street or an approved drainage course.
ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE: "Finish grade will provide a minimum positive
drainage of 2% to swale 5' away from building."
B. Existing&'Proposed Slopes and Topography
C. Size, type, location, alignment of existing or proposed sewer and water service (s)
that serves the project. Each unit requires a separate service, however, second
dwelling units and apartment complexes are an exception.
D. Sewer and water laterals should not be located within proposed driveways, per
standards.
D 3. Include on title sheet:
Site address
Assessor's Parcel Number
Legal Description
For commercial/industrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, include:
total building square footage with the square footage for each different use,
existing, sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing,
warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved.
EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION
Show all existing use of SF and new proposed use of SF.
, Example:
Tenant ImprOvement for 3500 SF of warehouse to 3500 SF of office.
Plancheck Cidsi Form (Genedc).doc 2 Rev. 7/14/00
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
1ST 2ND 3R0 DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE
E E R 4a. Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of approval for
ProjectNo.________________________________________________________
D E E 4b. All conditions are in compliance. Date:
DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS
Ei1 E D 5. Dedication for all street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the building site and any storm
A Aft< drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and
/ \ for remodels with a value at or exceeding $_15,000 , pursuant to Carlsbad
Municipal Code Section 18.40.030.
Dedication required as follows:
Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor
prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8 ½" x 11" plat map and
submit with a title report. All easement documents must be approved and signed
by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. Attached please find an
application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process. Submit the
completed application form with the required checklist items and fees to the
Engineering Department in person. Applications will not be accept by mail or fax.
Dedication coripleted by: Date:
IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS
D 6a. All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site 'must be I ' ' constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the
construction exceeds $_75,000 ,pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section
- 18.40.040.
Public improvements required as follows:
Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public
improvement requirements. A registered Civil Engineer must prepare the
appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements
on the attached checklist to the Engineering Department through a separate plan
check process. The completed application form and the requirements on the
PlancheckCkl,I Form (Generlc).doc 3 Rev. 7/14100
/OV
1ST 2ND 3RD
El F-1
LI LI LI
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
checklist must be submitted in person. Applications by mail or fax are not
accepted. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted
and fees paid prior to issuance of building permit.
Improvement Plans signed by: Date:
6b. Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad
Municipal Code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title report or
current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $_360.00 50 we may
preare the necessary Neighborhood Improvement Agreement. This agreement
must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a
Building permit.
Future public improvements required as follows:
Enclosed pleasefind your Neighborhood Improvement Agreement. Please return
agreement signed and notarized to the Engineering Department.
Neighborhood Improvement Agreement completed by:
Date:
No Public liprovements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or defective
imorovements found adiacent to buildina site must be reDaired to the satisfaction
GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section
11 .06.030 of the Municipal Code,
Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading
requirements. Include accurate grading quantities in cubic yards (cut, fill import,
export and remedial). This information must be included on the plans.
Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil
Engineer must be submitted together with the completed application form
attached. NOTE: The Grading Permit must be issued and rough grading
approval obtained prior to issuance of a Building Permit.
-
Grading, Inspector sign off by: Date:
LI LI 7c. Graded Pad Certification required. (Note: Pad certification may be required even
if a grading permit is not required.)
F:\Frnmor\<othyMASTERS\BoiIding Plancheck Mist Form (Generlc)doc 4 Rev. 7/14/00
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
1ST 2ND 3RD
El El El 7d. No Grading Permit required.
El El El 7e. If grading is not required, write "No Grading" on plot plan.
MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS
El El 0 8. A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-Way and/or
private work adjacent to the public Right-of-Way. Types of work include, but are
not limited to: street improvements, tree trimming, driveway construction, tying
into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities.
Right-of-Way permit required for:
El El El 9 INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT If your facility is located in the City of Carlsbad
sewer service area, you need to contact the Carlsbad Municipal Water District,
located at 5950 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008. District personnel can
provide forms and assistance, and will check to see if your business enterprise is
on the EWA Exempt List. You may telephone (760) 438-2722, extension 7153,
for assistance.
Industrial Waste permit accepted by:
Date:
El 0 El 10. NPDES PERMIT
Complies• with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant shall provide best
management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to
discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by
the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever
occurs first.
11. U R'red fees.are attached
No fees required
WATER METER REVIEW
El El El 12a. Domestic (potable) Use
EnsureS that the 'meter proposed by the owner/developer is not oversized.
- Oversized meters are inaccurate during low-flow conditions. If it is oversized, for
the life of the meter, the City will not accurately bill the owner for the water used.
All single family dwelling units received "standard" 1" service with 5/8" service.
1n9 Plancheck cklsl Forn (Generic).doc '5 Rev. 7114/00
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
1ST 2ND 3R0
If owner/developer proposes a size other than the "standard", then
owner/developer must provide potable water demand calculations,
which include total fixture counts and maximum water demand in gallons
per minute (gpm). A typical fixture count and water demand worksheet is
attached. Once the gpm is provided, check against the "meter sizing
schedule" to verify the anticipated meter size for the unit.
Maximum service and meter size is a 2" service with a 2" meter.
If a developer is proposing a meter greater than 2", suggest the
installation of multiple 2" services as needed to provide the anticipated
demand. (manifolds are considered on case by case basis to limit
multiple trenching into the Street).
O 0 0 12b. Irrigation Use (where recycled water is not available)
All irrigation meters must be sized via irrigation calculations (in gpm) prior
to approval. The developer must provide these calculations. Please follow
these guidelines:
If the project is a newer development (newer than 1998), check the recent
improvement plans and observe if the new irrigation service is reflected on
the improvement sheets. If so, at the water meter station, the demand in
gpm may.be listed there. Irrigation services are listed with a circled "I",
and potable water is typically a circled "W". The irrigation service should
look like:
Q STA 1+00 Install 2" service and
Lj 1.5: meter (estimated 100 gpm)
If the improvement plans do not list the irrigation meter and the
service/meter will be installed via another instrument such as the building
plans or grading plans (w/ a right of way permit of course), then the
applicant must provide irrigation calculations for estimated worst-case
irrigation :demand (largest zone with the farthest reach). Typically, Larry
Black has already reviewed this if landscape plans have been prepared,
but the applicant must provide the calculations to you for your use. Once
you have received a good example of irrigation calculations, keep a set for
your reference. In general the calculations will include:
Hydraulic grade line
Elevation at point of connection (POC)
• Pressure at POC in pounds per square inch (PSI)
Worse case zone (largest, farthest away from valve
Total Sprinkler heads listed (with gpm use per head)
Include a 10% residual pressure at point of connection
3. In general,, all major sloped areas of a subdivision/project are to be
irrigated via separate irrigation meters (unless the project is only SFD with
no HOA). As long as the project is located within the City recycled water
F:\Farme,KathyWASTERS\BuiIding Plancheck ChisI Form (Generlc).doc
-
-
• 6 Rev. 7/14/00
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1ST 2N 3RD.
service boundary, the City intends on switching these irrigation
services/meters to a new recycled water line in the future.
0 12c. Irrigation Use (where recycled water is available)
1. Recycled water meters are sized the same as the irrigation meter above.
2. If a project fronts a street with recycled water, then they should be
connecting to this line to irrigate slopes within the development. For
subdivisions, this should have been identified, and implemented on the
improvement plans. Installing recycled water meters is a benefit for the
applicant since they are exempt from paying the San Diego County Water
Capacity fees. However, if they front a Street which the recycled water is
there, but is not live (sometimes they are charged with potable water until
recycled water is available), then the applicant must pay the San Diego
Water Capacity Charge. If within three years, the recycled water line is
charged with recycled water by CMWD, then the applicant can apply for a
refund to the San Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA) for a refund.
However, let the applicant know that we cannot guarantee the refund, and
they must deal with the SDCWA for this.
13. Additional Comments:
F:\Farrne,\Xathy\MASTERS\8uildin9 Rencheck CklsI Form (Geneic).doc 7 Rev. 7114/00
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT I
FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET
0 Estimate based on unconfirmed information from applicant.
0 Calculation based on building plancheck plan submittal.
Address: Bldg. Permit No.________________________
Prepared by: Date: Checked by: Date:
EDU CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses.
Types of Use: . Sq. Ft./Units: EDU's:
Types of Use: • Sq. Ft./Units: EDUs:
ADT CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses.
Types of Use: Sq. Ft./Units: ADTs:
Types of Use: Sq. Ft./Units: ADT's:
FEES REQUIRED:
WITHIN CFD: 0 YES (no bridge & thoroughfare fee in District #1, reduced Traffic Impact Fee) 0 NO
0 1. PARK-IN-LIEU FEE PARK AREA & #:
FEE/UNIT:
.
X NO. UNITS: = $_____________
2. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE
ADTs/UNITS: X FEE/ADT:
= $____________
3. BRIDGE AND THOROUGHFARE FEE (DIST. #1 DIST. #2 DIST. #3
ADT/UNITS:S X FEE/ADI: =$
4. FACILITIES MANAGEMENT FEE ZONE:__________
UNIT/SQ.FT.: X FEE/SQ. FT. /UNIT: =$____________
5. SEWER FEE
EDU's: X FEE/EDU: S = $________________
BENEFIT AREA:
EDU's: X FEE/EDU: = $_______________
6. SEWER LATERAL ($2,500) = $_______________
7. DRAINAGE FEES PLDA : HIGH /LOW______
ACRES: X FEE/AC: = $_____________
8. POTABLE WATER FEES
UNITS CODE CONNECTION FEE METER FEE SDCWA FEE IRRIGATION
- lof2
Word\Docs\MjsformsFpp tiIr.i,IaIinn Wn,frh*
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST
Plan Check No. CB. oc- 20 ' I Address __2L{/ q L4 17Viccd&
Planner_M (E 6W Phone (760) 602-
APN:
Type of Project & Use:—'f PIP D Net Project Density:_-'// t
zoning:* 1, General Plan:_f2— UV Facilities Management Zone:
CFO (in/out) #_Date of participation: Remaining net dev acres:______
(For non-residential development Type of land used created by this Circle One permit:
LeàendL Itern Complete 0 Item Incomplete- Needs your action
Environmental Review Required: YES ____ NO TYPE
DATE OF COMPLETION: .
Compliance with conditions of approval? it not, state conditions which require action.
Conditions of Approval: .
.
0 0 0 Discretionary Action Required: YES ____ NO TYPE
APPROVAL/RESO. NO. . DATE_____ .
PROJECT NO. . . .
OTHER RELATED CASES: . .
Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action.
Coiditions of Approval:
0 0 Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance
Project site located in Coastal Zone? YES____ NO____ .
CA Coastal Comm ____ ission Authority? YES NO____
If California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact them at —.7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite 103,
San Diego..CA 92108-4402; (619) 767-2370
Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt):
Coastal Permit Determination Form already completed? YES____ NO____
If NO, complete Coastal Permit Determination Form now.
Coastal Permit Determination Log #:
FollowUp Actions:
Stamp Building Plans as "Exempt' or "Coastal Permit Required' (at minirriumFloor Plans).
Complete Coastal Permit Determination Log as needed.
E' El 0 Inclusionary Housing Fee required: YES _ NO _
(Effectivedate of Inclusionary Housing Ordinance - May 21, 1 993)
Data Entry Cgmpleted? YES___ NO
0 (AJP/Ds, Activity Maintenance, enter CB#, toolbar, Screens, Housing Fees, Construct Housing YIN,
Enter Fee, UPDATE!) 0 0
Site Plan:
HMDMIMCOUNTER8IdPlflChkevchldst Rev 1101
ci' 0 0
-
0 0
I . Provide a fully dimensional site plan drawn to scale. Show:. North' arrow, property lines,
easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way
width, dimensional setbacks, and existing topographical lines (including all side and rear yard
. slopes).
2. ¼Provide legal description of property and assessor's arcel number.
0 0
Policy 44— Neighborhood Architectural Design Güidóilnes
Applicability*. YES NO_______
Project complies YES NO . '
Zoning:
0 0 1. Setbacks:
Front:. . . Required ____ Shown
Interior Side:' Required - Shown
Street Side:. Required Shown
Rear. ' Required Shown -
Top of slope: ,
Required -_Shown '
0 0 Accessory structure setbacks:
Required '' Shown
r Side: Required Shown
2X
Side: Required '. Shown
' Required Shown
ure separation: Required Shown
D 0 Lot Coverage:'' 4C10 ' Required Shown .
27 o(
17
0 0 Height ' Required ' ?7o ' Shown
00 ' Parking: Spaces Required • Shown
(breakdown by uses for commercial and industrial projects required)
Residential Guest Spaces Required . Shown '
1 0 0 Additional comments •.
.
.1
DKTO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER • DATE/
HMDMINOUNTER\SIdgPIflKReVCPd$t Rev 91
- CIVIL
__ WON
ENGINEERS
October 1, 2005
3534 University Avenue
San Diego, CA. 92104
Telephone: (619) 282-2767
Facsimile: (619) 282-6723
Job No. 604-Z
City of Carlsbad
1635 Faraday Avenue
Carlsbad, California 92008
Re:, Truss Calculation Package Review
Proposed Addition
Martin Residence
La Tinada Ct.
Carlsbad, Ca 92009
Plan Check No.05-2059
Dear Building Department Official:
I am the engineer-of record for the subject project. I have reviewed and the truss calculation
package by Escondido-Truss for thesubject project.
Regards,
01irz..t,
Alex Wong, P.E.
Thomas Wong, Inc.
3534 University Ave.
San Diego, CA 92104
V. (619) 282-2767
F. (619) 282-6723
alex@ i.co
3('..• c'iY
- CIVIL
WONG
ENGINEERS
September 16, 2005
3534 University Avenue
San Diego, CA. 92104
Telephone: (619) 282-2767
Facsimile: (619) 282-6723
Job No. 604-Z
Mr. Mike Peterson
City of Carlsbad
1635 Faraday Avenue
Carlsbad, California 92008
Re: Geotechnical Report Requirement
Proposed Addition
Martin Residence
LalinadaCt.
Carlsbad, Ca 92009
Dear Mr. Peterson:
I am the engineer-of record for the subject project. I have been asked by the homeowner,
Brian Martin, to address several of the geotechnical related correction items as listed by David
Yäo, plan checker for Esgil Corporation.
The correction items I would like to address are:
No. 9, No. 10, No. 11, No. 12, No. 13, and No. 14.
The existing residence is a two-story, wood framed, slab on grade building. Proposed
construction consist of an expansion of the first floor kitchen and family room and the addition
of two bedrooms and a bathroom on the second floor. The proposed construction will consist
of wood framed roof, wall and floors on the second floor. The proposed construction on the first
floor will consist wood framed walls, slab-on-grade floor and reinforced concrete footings.
The subject site located on the north side of La Tinada Court. The building pad is underlain by
compacted fill soils. A report prepared by Woodward-Clyde and Associates, "Final Report of
Engineering Observation and Compaction Testing Rancho del Ponderosa Unit No.1 and
Offsite Fills (Carlsbad Tract 73-18) Lots 1 through 63 Carlsbad, California" dated February 13,
1976, documents that the subject site was filled with non-expansive soils which compacted
from 91.1 to 92.5% of relative maximum compaction (see Appendix for copy of the report).
,The proposed construction is conventional and special foundation requirements are not
necessary. The foundation was designed using an allowable soil bearing value of 1,000 psf.
The Final Report by Woodward-Clyde identifies the fill soils placed on the subject lot as being
non-expansive and states that foundations be designed for a bearing pressure of 2,000 psf at
a depth of 12 inches below compacted fill of undisturbed cut lot grade, that footings should
have a minimum width of 12 inches and that the bearing pressure may be increased by one-
third for loads that include wind or seismic forces.
Reviewing the Compaction Test Results included in the Final Report reveals that the subject
lot (Lot 52) was filled with 28 feet of compacted, non-expansive fill soils. Seismically induced
soil liquefaction and soil instability is most likely not a factor with the subject site. Seismically
induced soil liquefaction typically requires bodies of loose, relatively fine, uniform sand below
the water table, "especially if the duration of the quake is long enough for the occurrence of a
large number of oscillations involving repeated reversals of shearing strains of large amplitude.
After a violent earthquake has been in progress for a sufficient time, a loose zone at moderate
depth may liquefy, whereupon the excess water will rise to the surface, often in more or less
equally spaced sand boils. The sand above the liquefied zone is subjected to an upward
hydraulic gradient and also loses its shearing resistance; consequently, footings supported on
the sand may sink into the ground (lISEE 1965). Dense sands are less likely to experience
liquefaction under these circumstances because the duration of most violent earthquakes is
not long enough to encompass the required number of repetitions' (Terzaghi, K. and Peck, R.
(1967). Soil Mechanics in Engineering Practice, Second Edition. New York, John Wiley &
Sons, pp. 110-111).
The requirement that the soils enguieerjeviewthefoundationexcavation can be replaced by a
note on the plan that lf.durih inspection-of the foundation excavation the inspector
suspects the presncéof-'loosefilland/or potentially expansive soilsa geotechnicalengineer
will be soils report.-The soils report and revised building plans •willbè
submitted and reviewed by the City of Carlsbad Building Department. The-City-of Carlsbad
Building_Depañmë?ifill review the revised plans foçcompliance to the recommendations of
the Othnical engineer. The geotechnical engineer will review the foundation excavation
and advise the budding official in writing that the soils expansive characteristics and bearing
capacityconform.to the soils.repdrt. - - -
Using a Soil Profile, So, and reviewing "Maps of Known Active Fault Near-Source Zones In
California and Adjacent Portions of Nevada to be used with the 1997 Uniform Building Code"
(California Department of Conservation Division of Mines and Geology International
Conference of Building Officials February, 1998, pp. 0-36), I will determine the site's near-
source factor and identify the value on the building plans.
These specific correction items, with the exception of No's. 13 and 14, are listed in the 2001
CBC as requirements which are at the discretion of the building official. The owner and I feel
that a new geotechnical report is not necessary. I respectfully request that you will consider
waiving the specific correction items.
(
Thank you for your review of this natter.
Regards,
Alex Wong, P.E.
Thomas Wong, Inc. -J 3534 University Ave. -
San Diego, CA 92104
V. (619)282-2767 • •
F. (619) 282-6723 •' •
alex@wongengineering.com
APPENDIX
"Final Report of Engineering Observation and Compaction
/ Testing Rancho del ponderosa Unit No.1 and Off site Fills
(Carlsbad Tract 73-18) Lots 1 through 63 Carlsbad, California"
C
•
z_c LAT(,lL
ICY
vc £ ' 1 - I-c-- ore;^ -f.*
cø - I I
Or
I Soils Repot for Martin Residence
2414 LaTinadaCt.
Carlsbad, CA 92009 See sheets 1,2 & 3 of Compaction
4Pr p Lot 52 Rancho Ponderosa Unit No.1 Test Results, dated Feb. 13, 1976
W000WARD-CLYDE CONSULTANTS
CONSULTING ENGINEERS, GEOLOGISTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS
WESTERN REGION February 13, 1976 3467 Kurtz Street
San Diego Project No. 72-253
California 92110
Phone (714) 224-2911
RECE IVED
I
Ponderosa Homes
2082 Business Center Drive, Suite 100
Irvine, California 92664
Attention: Mr. Terry Teeple
FINAL REPORT OF ENGINEERING
OBSERVATION AND COMPACTION TESTING
RANCHO DEL PONDEROSA UNIT NO. 1
AND OFFSITE FILLS
(CARLSBAD TRACT 73-18)
LOTS I THROUGH 63
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA
San L.ckj,
11
In accordance with your request and our agreement dated October 24,
1975, we have provided soil engineering services in conjunction with the
grading of the subject site. These services included:
Engineering observation of the grading operation.
Observation of the removal of loose surface and alluvial soil where
encountered prior to placing fill.
Observation of the removal of potentially expansive soil from rough
lot grade where encountered and replacing it with nonexpansive soil.
Taking field density tests in the fill placed and compacted.
Performing laboratory tests on representative samples of the material
used for fill.
Periodic engineering and geologic inspections of the cut slope
areas.
General Site Grading
Site preparation, compaction, and testing were done between November 12,
1975 and January 27, 1976 in accordance with the "Specifications for
Controlled Fill" in the Woodward-Gizienski & Associates report entitled
"Rancho Del Ponderosa Development (Weigand Property) San Diego County,
California", dated September 13, 1973.
SlOb. 21. 56
Ponderosa Homes Page 2
Project No. 72-253
Febuary 13, 1976
'1
Fill was placed, compacted and tested on Lots 4 through 53. The grading
operation essentially consisted of excavating and compacting loose
surface and alluvial soils where encountered, undercutting expansive
soil encountered at finish grade and rolacina it with comoacted nonexpansive
fill, and making design cuts and fills in accordance with grading plans.
This included the placing of fills adjacent to the site in the area of
Unit 2 and Constructing a large fill in a canyon area in future Unit 3.
As the site grading progressed, the compaction procedures were observed,
and field density tests were made to determine the relative compaction
of the fill in place. Field observations and field density test results
indicate that the fill has been compacted to 90% or more of maximum
laboratory density. The approximate locations of field density tests
and the limits of compacted fill have been recorded on a copy of the
grading plan for reference. The results of field density tests and of
relative compaction, expressed as a percent of maximum laboratory
density, are given on the attached forms.
Laboratory tests to determine moisture-density relationships, maximum
dry density, optimum moisture content, grain size distribution, plasticity
characteristics, and strength characteristics were performed on representative
samples of the material used for fill. The results of laboratory tests
are given on the attached forms.
The following lots are fill lots either as a result of design fills
as a result of undercutting at finish grade: Lots 4 through 15 an 17
through 53.
The following lots are cut lots at the end of the grading period: Lots
1, ? 3 and 54 through 63.
Lot 16 is a cut-fill lot.
Special Finish Grade Treatment
During the grading operation certain lots were specially treated to
provide a specified depth of selected soil at rough grade.
Laboratory tests and visual inspection indicate that nonexpansive fill
was pTaced within 3 feet of rough grade on all fill lots and on the fill
portion of the cut-fill lot noted herein. On Lots 4 through 7, 9 through
15, the cut portion of 16, 20 through 26, 36,37 and 38 potentially
expansive soil was excavated and replaced with nonexpansive fill to a
depth of 2 feet below rough lot grade and within the limits of the
entire level lot. -
WQODWIIRD.CLYDE CONSULTANTS
Ponderosa Homes Page 3
P'roject No. 72-253
February 13, 1976
Rough lot grade is defined as that grade set in the field by the grade
checker from reference stakes established by the surveyor and represents
rough grade at the time we were inspecting the removal and replacement
of expansive soils. Likewise the depths of undercutting of expansive
soil and/or depths of placement of nonexpansive soil were in accordance
with measurements made by and grades set by the contractor's grade
checker.
A visual inspection of cut Lots 1, 2, 3, and 54 through 63 at completion
of grading indicate that potentially expansive soi1is not evident at
rough grade surface.
Geologic Inspections
Geologic inspections were made of the cut slopes on site during the
grading period. The purpose of these inspections was to determine
whether any adverse geologic conditions are apparent in the slope. The
cut slope bordering Olivenhain Road was examined on November 17, 1975 by
an engineering geologist of our firm. This inspectio.n revealed that the
'slope is a, combination cut-fill slope with an approximate 2 to 1 (horizontal
to vertical) inclination and approximately 30 feet high at the maximum
point. The cut portion of the slope is composed of interbeddea greenish-
grey claystone and siltstone with some sandstone similar to materials
found in Tertiary sediments-common to the area. The orientation of the
strata in the slope was essentially horizontal and jointing and fracturing
were not intense. No clay seams or groundwater was noted in the slope.
There were no apparent geologic conditions exposed in the slope that are
considered, in our opinion, adverse to the relative stability of the
slope.
The cut-fill slope between Lots 9 - 10, and 7 - 8 was examined on December
12, 1975. This slope is approximately 15 feet in height oriented in an
east west direction and inclined on 2 to 1. The slope generally incorporated
interbedded sandstone and cTaystone of Tertiary age. A thin and very
stiff, discontinuous clay seam was noted in the approximate mid-height
of the slope. Measurement of the orientation of the seam revealed that
it varied from horizontal to approximately 2 to 3 degrees to the west.
The compacted fill portion of the slope thickens rapidly towards the
west and the slope becomes a-fill slope at the western edge of Lot 8.
It is our opinion that this compacted fill provides a resisting mass
against possible movement in a westerly direction. We have reviewed our
previous slope stability analysis taking into consideration the presence
of the clay seam. It is our opinion that the presence of this seam does
not significantly effect the relative overall stability of the slope.
WOODWIUW-CI.YOC CONSIJ1T1NIS
Ponderosa Homes Page 4
Project No. 72-253
February 13, 1976
A final inspection of the subdivsion was made by the project engineer on
January 23, 1976. This inspection revealed several small wet areas in
the slope; however, no free seeping or standing water was noted. The
most noticeble' wet area was at the toe of the slope at the rear of Lot
14. Here the wetness, extended approximately 6 inches above the lot
level and generally covered an area approximately 5 feet wide by 15 feet
long paralleling the slope. A toe drain consisting of a perforated pipe
placed in a shallow trench at the slope toe and embedded in a filter
material may be employed to help minimize the problem. This system
could exit between lots to a curb outlet. Details of drain construction
can be issued upon request. The wet area may dry up in time and depending
on construction schedule, .it may be convenient to observe the seep for a
period of time before making a decision to install the drain.
Foundation Recommendation - All Lots
Foundations for single or two-story residential structures placed
.on nonexpansive undisturbed soil or nonexpansive properly compacted fill
may be designed for a bearing pressure of 2000 psf (dead plus live
loads) ata depth of 12 inches below compacted fill or undisturbed cut
lot grade. Footings should have a minimum width of 12 inches. The
bearing pressure may be increased by one-third for loads that include
wind or seismic forces.
Structures'.that will not tolerate differential settlements (such as
foundations, swimming pools, concrete decks, walls, etc.) should not ,be
located within 5 feet of the top of a slope. Footings located closer
than 5 feet from the top of a slope should be extended in depth until
the outer bottom edge ofthe footing is 5 feet horizontally from the
outside' face of the slope.
It is recommended that expansive soils be considered in the design
of other structures that may be placed on the lots below grade such as
swimming poOls. 0
Limitations and Backfil.ling
The elevations of compaction tests shown as finished grade (FG) tests
correspond to the elevations shown on the grading plans for "Carlsbad
Tract No. 73-18, (Rancho Del Ponderosa) Unit No. 1" dated August 15,
1974, prepared by Rick Engineering Company, San Diego, California.
Elevatiors and locations shown in this report are based on field surveys
established by others.
WOODWARD.CIYDI CONSULTANTS
,Ponderosa Homes Page 5.
Project No; 72-253
February 13, .1976
This report covers the fill placed under our observation during the
dates specified herein. Additional fill placed after these dates, as
well as the backfill in utility trenches located within 5 feet of a
building and greater than 12 inches deep, or any trench 5 feet or more
from a building and inexcess of 5 feet in depth, should be compacted
under the observation of this office and tested to assure compliance
with the earthwork specifications for the project. This office should
be contacted at least 24 hours. prior to backfilling operations. Utility
service trenches within 5 feet of. a building that are perpendicular to
the building footings and are--less than 12 inches wide and less than 3
feet deep are not subject to this recommendation.
The inspections of foundation preparation, types of materials and soil
placement and compaction as well as tests of compaction made during the
period of our services on the subject site were in accordance with the
local acceptable standards for this period. The conclusions or opinions
drawn from the tests and site inspections apply only to our work with
- respect to grading and represent conditions at the date of our final
inspection. -
We will accept no responsibility for any subsequent changes made to the
site by others or by uncontrolled action of water or by failure of
others to properly repair damages caused by uncontrolled action of
water.
WOODWARD-CLYDE CONSULTANTS
ouis J. Le" R.E. 14129
LJL/JLH/RPW/EHP/we
Attachments
(1) Ponderosa Homes, Irvine - Attention: Terry Teeple
(4) Ponderosa Homes, San Diego - Attention: Karl Kreutzer
(1) Rick Engineering Company
WOODWARD CIYfl( CON(1I1ANIS
COMPACTION TEST RESULTS
JOB NAME RANCHO DEL PONDEROSA UNIT NO. 1 DATE REPORTED 12-8-75
JOB NUMBER 72-253 -
D
.
ATES COVERED Noventher 12, 1975 Through December 4, 1975 PAGE 1 OF 3
-.
DATE SELATIVE
COMPACTION TEST RETEST I LOCATION ELEVATION
NOISYUEI
CONTENT
YIELD
DENSITY
&.ASORATOY
DENSITY NUMLLR OF OF TEST % CRY WY. PCF PCP V. OF LAS. OLNI.
!OV 12 1 LOT 27 98' 16.9 101.7 109.5 92.7
2 " 29 98' 17.6' 99.5 109.5 90.8
3 28 100' 16.9 99.6 109.5 90.9
4 . 30 100' 19.0 101.9 109.5 93.0
IOV 13 5 LOT 27 102' 17.6 101.8 109.5 92.9
6 . , . 29 102' 15.6 103.3 109.5 94.3
7 28 104' 16.9 100.3 109.5 91.6
8 30 104' 15.6 103.9 113.5 91,5
9 29 - 107' 18.3 102.3 113.5 90.1
0 10 - 31 •, 107' 16.9 104.0 113.5 91.6
.OV 14 11 LOT 28 110' 17.6 103.8 113.5 91.3
12 30 110' 16.3 105.2 113.5 92.7
13 - 32 . '" 110' 19.0 103.1 113.5 90.9
14 29 112' 15.6 104.9 113.5 92.4
:15 31 . 112' 16.9 105.2 113.5 92.7
.1W 17 16 -LOT 33 112' 15.6 99.0 109.5 90.4
17 . 32 115' 16.9 103.5 113.5 91.2
18 30 115' 16.9 104.9 113.5 92.4
19 28 115' 17.6 104.3 113.5 91.9
20 29 1171 19.0 104.3 113.5 91.9
• 21 31 117' 16.9 100.3 109.5 91.6
22 . 33 117' 17.6 103.9 113.5 91.5
23 . . 44 .. 118' 16.3 106.0 113.5 93.3
24 LOT 43 1 120' 15.6 100.5 113.5 88.5
32 - 120' 16.3 105.0 113.5 92.5
26 . 30 120' 15.6 106.6 113.5 93.8
27 28 120' 13.6 115.0 122.0 94.3
28. 24 43 . 120' 13.0 112.0 122.0 91.9
- 29 . 26 ' 105' 16.9 101.2 111.5 90.8
30 / 27 •. • 108' 15.6 101.9 111.5 91.5
31 26 " 110' 16.3, 102.8 111.5 92.2
32 . .. 27 .. 113' 16.3 103.8 113.5 91.4
)V 19 33 LOT. 26 ' * 115' 18.3 103.0 113.5 90.7 34
-' 27 118' 18.3 104.6 113.5 92.1 35 26 120' 1.5.6 105.3 113.5 92.7
• 36 . . 27 123' 19.0 103.6 113.5 91.3
37 . 29 ' 123' 15.6 104.1 113.5 91.6 38 . . 31 123' ' 16.3 105.2 113.5 92.7
.
•.
JOB NAME
Joe NuMUER
DATES COVERED
COMPACTION TEST RESULTS
RANCHO DEL PONDEROSA UNIT NO. 1
.72-253
November 12, 1975 Through December 4, 1975
DATE REPORTED 12-8-75
PAGE 2 or 3
DATE TIlT
-
RITES, LOCATION ELEVATION
MOISTUUI
CONTENT
III.O
DENEITY
LAI0IAT0Y
DENSITY
IlLATIVE -
COUeACVION NIJNeIR Or - OIr TEST % DRY WT. PCF PCP % or LAS. DENS.
by 20 39 LOT 33 123' 17.6 101.8 111.5 91.2
40 44 123' '16.3 103.3 111.5 92.6
41 8 123' 9.9 112.0 122.0 91.8
42 34 . 126' 13.0 113.9 122.0 93.2
43 . 32 126' 11.1 112.0 122.0 91.7
. 44 30 126' 9.3 112.9 122.0 92.6
'4 5 28 126' 10.5 111.6 122.0 91.4
by 21 46 LOR 8 126' 18.3 103.8 111.5 93.0
.47 29 128' 19.0 102.1 111.5 91.5
48 . 31 128' 16.3 104.7 111.5 93.8
49 33 128' 15.6 102.5 111.5 91.9
50 . 35 128' 16.9 103.3 111.5 92.6
51 .
.'
43 128' 19.0 101.8 111.5 91.3
'nv 22 52 LOT 20 . 120' 9.9 110.3 115.0 95.8
53 19 123' 12.3 107.7 115.0 93.5
54 21 125' 11.7 111.0 115.0 96.5
55 18 127' 12.3 108.5 115.0 94.3
56 - , 20 . 127' 12.3 109.0 115.0 94.7
57' 21 1301 14.3 105.0. 115.0 92.1
58 . 19 130' 13.0 105.7 115.0 91.8
59 . 20 133' 14.3 104.2 115.0 90.6
60 . 18 133' 14.3 104.7 115.0 91.0
MV. 24 61 LOT 19' . FG 135.8' 14.9 104.5 115.0 91.0
62 . '17 135' 14.3' 106.4 115.0 92.6
.63 18 137' 12.3 106.6 115.0 92.7
64 17 FG 138.8' 15.6 106.6 115.0 92.7
65 18 FG 133.4' 14.9 106.0 115.0 92.2
66 ' 8 129' 19.0 102.5 111.5 92.0
67 30 • 130' 17.6 104.0 111.5 93.3
68 32 130' 15.6 103.5 111.5 92.7
•
- • .
34 . 130' 15.6 . 103.2 111.5 92.5
DV 25 70 LOT 45, 128' 14.9 104.5 111.5 93.6
71 ' 44 130' 16.9 105.0 111.5 94.1
72 42 130' 1,3 103.8 111.5 93.0
73 13 133' 17.6 101.1 111.5 3.1
11 45 133' 18.3 104.9 111.5 94.0
75 . 12 . • 135' 14.9 105.0 111.5 94.1
76 - 14. , 135' 17.6 107.0 111.5 95.9
COMPACTION TEST RESULTS
JOB NAME RANCHO DEL PONDEROSA UNIT NO. 1 DATE REPORTED 12-8-75
Joe NUMBER . 72-253 -
DATES COVE RED November 12-, 1975 Through December 4, 1975 PAGE 3 Or 3
DAYS 'MOT -RETEST NUUBI.R OT LOCAYIO [LVAYION
NOISTUt
CONTENT
FIELD
DIN.I'ry
IJ.IORAYORY
DENSITY
I..A7IvI
COMPACTION OF TEST % DRY WY. PCF PCP % OF LAS. OLM.
JEC 3 77 LOT 20 FG 135.0' 13.0 106.9 115.0 92.9
78 21 FG 132.6' 13.0 103.5 115.0 94.2
70 22 FG 131.6' 14.3 104.6 115.0 90.9 el 30 23 FG 128.9' 12.3 106.0 115.0 92.1
31 26 125' 11.7 103.7 115.0 94.4
82 27 FG 127.0' 11.7 110.6 115.0 96.2
)EC 4 83 LOT 28 FG 128.2' 13.0 107.0 115.0 93.0
34 29 FG 131.2 13.0 107.1 115.0 93.1
35 31 132' 14.9 105.9 115.0 92.1
36 24 - FG 128.2' 13.6 105.8 115.0 92.1
87 25 FG 127.0' 11.7 107.3 115.0 93.5
1
COMPACTION TEST RESULTS
JOB NAME RAi'CH0 DEL PONDEROSA Ui'UT #1 DATE REPORTO February 13, 1976
Jon NUMBER 72-253 *
DATES COVERED December 4, 1975-through January 23, 1976 PAGE 1 o,
5'
DATE TEST
NUMOCR
RETEST LOCATION
0,
DEC 88 L0126
89 30
00 33
91 35
92 34
93 32
DEC 17 94 LOT 33
95 35
96 36.
97 34
.98 51
99
•
43*
45 100
101 52
42 102
103 . 44
104 46
DEC 18 105 LOT 41
106 43
107 45
108 ,51 -
109 42
- 110 44
- 111 46
ELEVATION
OF TEST
MOISTURE
CONTENT
% Day WT.
FIELD
DENSITY
pCr
LABORATORY
DENSITY
Pc,
RELATIVE COMPACTION
% or LAP. DENS.
FG 126.8' 11.1 105.2 115.0 91.5
FG 134.4' 13.0 106.0 115.0 92.1
133' 13.0 104.8 115.0 91.0
133' 12.3 105.5 115.0 91.7
136' 11.1 104.0 115.0 90.5
136' 13.0 105.8 115.0 91.9
FG 138.1' 12.3 107.3 115.0 93.4
19' 13.0 105.9 115.0 92.0
142' 14.3 107.0 115.0 93.0
FG 140.2' 11.7 106.6 115.0 92.6
138' 13.0 106.9 115.0 92.9
138' 12.3 105.0
1060
115.0
115.0
91.4 . .
92.2 138'
141'
12.3
12.3 106.9 114.0 93.6
141' 14.9 104.8 114.0 91.9
141' 11.7 104.3 114.0 91.6
141' 12.3 106.9 114.0 93.7
144' 13.0 104.6 114.0 91.8
144' 11.7 105.0 114.0 92.1
12.3 106.2 114.0 93.3
14.3 106.3 114.0 93.4
148' 13.6 104.1 114.0 91.4
148' 15.6 110.2 114.0 96.6
148' 14.3 105.2 114.0 92.4
Ii
114
33
- 51
I j i
151'
l_..)
16.3
IU.).0
106.1 113.5 93.5
115 . 41 151' 16.9 109.9 113.5 96.8
116 43 151' 12.3 106.3 115.0 92.5
DEC 19 117 . LOT 45 151' 13.0 104.9 115.0 92.2
i18 40 154' 11.1 106.9 115.0 93.0
119 * 42 154' 11.7 105.1 115.0 91.5 120 44 154' 11.7 104.2 115.0 90.6 171 4A 154' 13.0 105.7 115.0 91.9 122 • 52 154' 13.0 107.8 115.0 93.7
lzli 50 . 154 12.3 106.0 115.0 92.3 124 49 158' 11.7 105.0 115.0 91.2 125 51 158' 11.1 105.9 115.0 92.2 126 53 158' 12.3 108.5 115.0 - 94.4
127 41 158' 12.3 106.2 115.0 92.5
128 43 158' 11.7 106.0 115.0 92.3 129 45 158' 11.1 111.9 115.0 97.2 130 47 158' 13.6- 106.9 115.0 93.0
COMPACTION TEST RESULTS
Joe NAME RAiCH0. DEL PONDEROSA Uflhl I1 DATE REPORTED February 13, 1976
JOB NUMBER 72-253
DATES COVERED December. 4, 1975 through January 23, 1976 PAGE 2 Opp 3
DATE lilT RETEST
NUMDIR OF LOCATION
-
ELEVATION
OF TEST
MOISTURE
CONTENT
% DRY WI.
FIELD
DENSITY
PCF
LABORATORY
DENSITY
PCP
RELATIVE
COMPACTION 'A OF LAD. PENS.
DEC 20 131 LOT 9 FG 127.5' 11.1 108.7 115.0 94.4
132 10 FG 128.4' 12.3 107.7 115.0 93.6
133 11 FG 130.7' 11.7 106.5 115.0 92.6
134 12 FO 131.6' 13.0 105.9 115.0 92.0
135 13 FG 134.0' 13.0 105.0 115.0 91.4
136 14 - FG 135.0' 13.0 + 106.9 115.0 92.9
137 15 FG 137.8' 11.7 108.7 115.0 94.4
138 31. FG 136.2' 14.3 '. 105.0 115.0 91.4
DEC 22 139 LOT 32 FG 137.4' 13.6 105.5 115.0 91.6
140 35 FG 112.5' 13.6 101.8 115.0 91.0
141 52 160' 14.9 106.0
105.9
115.0
115.0
92.2
9.0 14
143
. 50
39
160'
158'
1.3
13.0 104.8 115.0 91.1
144 40- 160' 13.0, 104.7 115.0 91.0
145 . . .42 160' 13.6 107.8 115.0 93.6
146 44 160' 14.9 105.2 115.0 91.5
DEC 23 147 LOT 46 - 160' 13.0 107.0 115.0 93.0
148 53 . 162' 14.3 104.7 115.0 91.0
149 ' 51 - 162' 14.3 104.7 115.0 91.0
150 49 - 162' 13.6 105.8 115.0 92.0
151 . 39 162' 12.3 108.7 115.0 94.4
152 , 41 - 162' 14.3 106.9 115.0 92.8
153 43 . . 162' 13.0 105.0 115.0 91.3
154 - 45 '. 162' 14.9 105.0 115.0 91.3
155 . 47 . 162' 11.7 108.8 115.0 94.5
OEC 26 , 156 " LOT 40 , 164' 14.3 107.5 115.0 93.5
157 .. 42 164' 12.3 106.0 115.0 92.2
-158 44 . 164' 14.3 104.0 115.0 90.5
159 46, . 164' 13.0 106.1 115.0 92.3
160 ,
48' 164' 14.9 106.9 115.0 92.7
DEC 27 161 LOT 50 ' 14' 14.3 105. 115.0 92.0
162 52 . 164'
131
13.6
13.0
106.2
106.
115.0
115.0
92.5 ] 92.7 163
164 8 134' 12.3 108.3 115.0 94.2
165' . .' 7 137' 12.3 108.4 115.0 94.3
166 ' 8 140' 13.0 105.1 115.0 91.4
167 . 39 , 166' 14.3 106.0 115.0 92.2
168 41' 166' 12.3 107.7 115.0 93.5
169 , . 43 166' 11.7 108.3 115.0 94.2
170 45 166' 12.3' 106.8 115.0 92.7
COMPACTION TEST RESULTS
JOB NAME
Joe NUMBER
DATES COVERED
RANCHO DEL PONDEROSA UNIT #1
72-253
December 4, 1975 through January 23,-1976
DATE REPORTED February 13, 1976
PAGE 3 OF 3
DATE
-
T5T RETEST LOCATION
NUMDIR OF
ELEVATION
OF TEST
MOIIIUNi
CONTENT % DV WT.
FIELD
DENSITY
PCF
LABORATORY
DENSITY
PCF_-
RELATIVE
COMPACTION
'A OF LAD. OLNI.
DEC Z9 171 LOT 47 166' 14.9 105.7 115.0 91.8
• 172 49 166' 15.6 103.4 115.0 90.8
173 51 166' 13.0 105.1 115.0 91.4
- 174 53 166' .13.0 107.0 115.0 93.1
175 40 . • FG 167.7' 13.6 105.2 115.0 91.5
176 42 FG 168.2' 12.3 110.0 115.0 95.6
177 39 . FG 167.4' 11.1 108.9 115.0 94.6
• 178 41 FG 167.91 12.3 106.0 115.0 92.2 179 43 FG 168.7' 13.0 107.9 115.0 93.8
180 44 FG 169.0' 12.3 105.9 115.0 92.1
DEC 30 11 1-04, 53 FG 157.6' 13.0 10.8 11.0 92.0
[1 82 52 FG 167.8' 14.9
13.0
105.0
108.4
115.0
115.0
91.1
94.3 183
184
51 -
50
FG
FG
168.2'
168.5' 12.3 107.9 115.0 93.8
185 . 49 FG 168.7' 13.0 107.8 115..0 93.6
186 48 FG 169.01 11.7 108.1 115.0 94.0 187 47 " FG 169.3' 12.3 108.0 115.0 93.9 188 46 FG 169.3' 13.0 105.5 115.0 91.6
189 . 45 FG 169.3' 13.0 105.5 115.0 91.6 190
.•
36 FG 145.0' 13.0 105.3 115.0 91.5
JAN 22 191 LOT 37 FG 147.0' 11.1 107.1 115.0 93.3
192 38 FG 148.4' 11.7 105.0 115.0 91.1
193 8 . FG 141.1' 12.3 106.3 115.0 92.5 194 7•
..
FG 142.5' 13.6 104.8 115.0 91.2
JAN 23 195 LOT 6 FG 146.1' 13.0 105.4 115.0 91.5
196 5 FG 147.6' 11.7 107.2 115.0 93.4 197 4 . . FG 151.0' 15.6 104.9 115.0 91.3
198 16 FG 138.8' 12.3 106.5 115.0 92.6
COMPACTION TEST RESULTS
JOB NAM E RANCHO DEL PONDEROSA UNIT #1 DATE REPORTED February 13, 197€
JOB NUMBER 72-253 (Streets)
DATES COVERED November 14, 1975through January 23, 1976 o-2
DATE ?uY RcTg9T LOCATION ELEVATION
MOISTURE
CONTENT
FIELD
CENRITY
LABORATORY
DENSITY
RELATIVE
COMPACTION
HUMBCR OP OP TEST % D*Y WY. PCi PCP % O LAL DENS.
NOV 14 s-i LA BRUSCA WAY:
OPP LOT 30 110' 15.6 103.8 113.5 91.4
NOV 17 5-2 LA BR1JSCAWAY:
OPP LOT -29 114' 16.9 104.0 113.5 91.6
S-3 OPP LOT 31 117' 16.3 105.1 113.5 92.5
NOV 18 5-4 LA BRUSCA WAY:
OPP LOT 28 120' 16.9 105.2 113.5 92.7
5-5 OPP LOT 30 123' 17.6 10L8 111.5 91.2
NOV 20 s-6 LA BRUSCA WAY:
OP LOT 9 126' 15.6 104.2 113.5 91.7
5-7 LA UCARE4A DRIVE:
OPP LOT 8 126' 15.6 105.3 113.5 92.7
NOV 24 S-8 LA MACARENA DRIVE:
DPi' LOT 8 130' 16.3 103.8 113.5 94.1
5-9 LA BRUSCA WAY:
OPP LOT 29 130' 16.3 105.0 113.5 92.5
NOV 25 S-iD LA BRUSCA WAY:
OPP LOT 32 133' 17.6 103.9 113.5 91.5
S-il LA r1ACARENA DRIVE:
OPPLOT35 133' 17.6 101.8 109.5 92.7
S-12 LA TINADA COURT:
OPP LOT 8 135' 16.9 103.6 113.5 91.3
S-13 OPP LOT 42 135' 13.0 107.0 115.0 93.0
DEC 17 S-14 LA TINADA COURT:
OPP LOT 51 140' 14.9 105.9 115.0 92.1
S-15 -- OPP. LOT 43 144' 11.7 107.3 115.0 93.5
DEC 18 S-16 LA TINADA COURT:
OPP LOT 44 148' 13.0 106.0 115.0 92.0
S-17 OPP LOT 41 152' 12.3 105.0 115.0 91.4
DEC 19 S-18 - LA TINADA COURT:
OPP LOT 50 155' 14.3 107.0 115.0 93.0
DEC 20 S-19' LA TINADA COURT:
OPP LOT '48 159' 11.1 104.0 115.0 90.5
S-20 OPP LOT 52 159' 12.3 106.2 115.0 93.3
COMPACTION TEST RESULTS
Joe NAME RA14CHO DEL PONDEROSA UNIT #1 ERzPoRTo February 13, 1976
Jos NUMBER 72-253 (Streets)
DATES COVERED November 1.4, 1975 through January 23, 1976 PAGE S-2 OF S-2
DATE TT RETEST LOCATION
MOIITURE
ELEVATION CONT&NT
1tW
ON8ITY
LAtOHAYO*Y
OENITY
RtLATIVV
COMPACTION
NUMOI..R OF OF TEST
-
DRY WT PCF PCP OF LAO. OCNU ,.Or
DEC-23 S-21 LA TINADA COURT:
'OPP LOT 51 162' 11.7 105.1 115.0 91.5
S-22 OPP LOT 45 162' 13.0 104.8 115.0 92.1
DEC 26 S-23 LATINADA COURT:
OPP LOT 43 165' 16.9 109.9 113.5 96.8
5-24 OPP LOT 40 165' 13.6 104.8 115.0 92.1
5-25 LOS PINOS DRIVE:
OPP LOT 53 164' 14.3 105.0 115.0 91.4
JAN 23 5-26 LOS PINOS DRIVE:
OPP LOT 54 168' 11.1 112.0 . 115.0 97.3
S-27 - OPP LOT 53 170' 13.6 106.9 115.0 93.2
/
LI
•. COMPACTION TEST RESULTS
JOB NAME RANCHO DEL PONDEROSA UNIT #1 DATE REPORTED February 13, 197
JOB NUMBER 72-253 . (Electrical Trench Backfill)
December 29, 1975 through January 6, 1976 PAG1 o, E-1 DATES COVERED
PATS SLATIYE
COMPACTION
% LAB. DENS.
T$T
NUNSLR
RETEST LOCATION
O -
CLEVATION
OF TEST
OI5VURS
CONTENT
% CRY WT.
FIELD
DENSITY
PCF
LA$ORATORY
DENSITY
PCP
DEC 29 E-1 OLIVENHAIN ROAD:
STA 23+60 130' 14.9 104.5 115.0 91.0
E-2 STA 23+00 131' 14.3 106.4 115.0 92.4
E-3 STA 22+00 134' 14.9 106.0 115.0 92.1
DEC 30 E-4 OLIVENHAIN ROAD:
STA 22+00 125' • 13.0 106.7 115.0 92.7
E-5 STA 22+50 129' 14.3 104.6 115.0 90.8
JAN 5. E-6 OLIVENHAIN ROAD:
I STA 20+00 - 115' 12.3 106.0 115.0 92.0 E-7 ,- STA 18+00 105' 14.3 104.7 115.0 91.0 E-8 STA 18+80 111' 14.3 104.2 115.0 90.6
JAN 6 E-9 OLIVENHAIN ROAD:
STA 20+75 121' 13.0 105.7 115.0 91.8
• E-10 STA 16+00 95' 14.3 106.0 115.0 92.0
mn ------ -
Q- 20
150
ZERO AIR VOIDS CURVES
-2.80 SG
—2.7OSG
—2.6OSG
140 2.50 SG
130
120
•
I,
Maximum Dry 1 2 J 3 H- Dmsity, pci 109.5'113.5 111.5
Optimum Moisture
Conknt, 17. 0 17.0 16.5
J [ MOISTURE CONTENT, 'X =
PLASTICITY CHARACTERISTICS 1 2 3 1
Ljquid Limit, % - 54 44 I _49
Plasticity Index, % 35 24 26'"l
Classification by Unified Soil
Classification System CH CL CH
01-1 Ill liii (Ill 11 1 I I
1000 100 10 1.0 0.1 0.01 0.001
GRAIN SIZE, mm
MECHANICAL ANALYSIS
DIRECT SHEAR TEST DATA 1 2 3
Dry Density, pcf 89.6 102.2 90.2
Initial Water Content, % 16.0 17.9 15.3
Final Water Content, % _29....4
200
_4 aZ5
Apparent Cohesion, psI I cn ?Q_..
170 - Apparent Friction Angle, degrees L 8° 1 26--
SWELL TEST DATA
Initial Dry Density, pcf
Initial Water Content, %
Final Dry Density, pcI________
Final Water Content, %
Load, psi
Swell, percent
SAMPLE LOCATION
1 L0T9
2 -19T L2
3 LOT22
1(1 20 30 LAflOnATORYCpMPACTIçJ
L Alt()UA1OUY (;OMPACTION us r lEST MEl ItO!) ,Sl Fl-I) I .).)7 70 A
I Iii. SIIIi AI)II liv I LS FS
)/\lIl.II(I Ill I 1 1(411)1 1f01,/\ Ill
t)I1W flY. /\, flu ( 1(1 IIV iii(tlt 14 1\10
PLASTICITY CHARACTERISTICS 4 5
Liquid Limit, % — 31
Plasticity Index, % 9
Classification by Unified Soil
Classification System SC NP'
COBBL c f Id ml f I SILT & CLAY ES
GRAVEL I SAND t
100
80[
in V)
60
F- z Lu 40
.120-- I
110
.1
71
oa
01_I III II II I r II lit I
1000 100 10 1.0 0.1 0.01 0.001
GRAIN SIZE, mm
MECHANICAL ANALYSIS
DIRECT SHEAR TEST DATA 4 5
Dry Density, pcf 1 09.6 102.7
Initial Water Content, % 12.9 14.9
Final Water Content, % 17.1_ 19.,fl --
Apparent Cohesion, psf .100
--
Apparent Friction Angle, degrees 132'
280
SWELL TEST DATA
Initial Dry Density, pcf
Initial Water Content, %
Final Dry Density, pcI________
Final Water Content, %
Load, pst
Swell, percent
150
ZERO AIR VOIDS CURVES
-2.80 SO
— 2.70 SG
— 2.60 SG
140 2.50 SO
130
90
Maximum Dry
f).:in.iiy. I)Ct . 122.0 r
0ptm1ium Moisture
Content, 12.5 14.5
80- 1--] I I MOlS1lJIE CONTENT, % - -
I) II) 2() 30
L.AltORA10I1Y COMPACTION TEST
SAMPLE LOCATION
.A... LOLiU_.______
5 EJJL AREA LOT #19
.10 LABORATORY QATO4 57-70 TUST MCII lOt): ... ..
lilt. S(iIFAflhi.ITY TESTS
IAlIIRl III I I'('IlnuIl)';/\ II I
tulIWN IIY A'. j (iii t:)( I lillY. I'Il(;iI ci Nil. /i1:5I l A 11;_j'_ / 1 11C.0111 NO.
DIRECT SHEAR TEST DATA 5 7
DryDensity,pcf 109.3 102_.4
InitialWaterContent,% 17.1 15.4
FinalWaterContent,% 16.1 19.7
ApparentCohesion,pst
350 I~A
60160
ApparentFrictionAngle,degrees 310
SWELL TEST DATA
Initial _Dry _Density, _pcf
Initial WaterContent,%
FinalDryDensity.pcf
Final Water Content. %
Load,psf
Swell, percent
130
PLASTICITY CHARACTERISTICS 6 7
Liquid_Limit,_%
Plasticity Index. % NP NP
Classification by Unified Soil
Classification System SM SM
150
!NS 1 UILI 2.80 SG
.11111 iISIG
uwa ip S ¶4-
C. man==
ftlm ___•u.__I_
___u a i__I .5 ___rnrn1
___•m•i__•
2 UJ 40 C)
U) o. 20
0 I_I III I II I I II Ill • I I
1000 100 10 1.0 0.1 0.01 0.001
GRAIN SIZE. mm
MECHANICAL ANALYSIS
4.,
90 I I II
Maximum Dry 6 7 T
Density, pcf 122.04.
1
Optimum Moisture
1 Content.% 12.0 _15.0
800
MOISTURE CONTENT,
10 20 30
LABORATORY COMPACTION TEST
SAMPLE LOCATION
6 L0153
7 LOT 58
40 LABORATORY COMPACTION
TEST METHOD: ASTM —D 1557 1ft A
FILL SUITARIIITY TESTS
I . RANCHO DEL PONDEROSA 1/1
DRAWN DV: AS __CHECKEDBV:('HOJECTNO:
_253 _DATE: ?/I 31.16 J_FIGURENO:3
10/18/05 TUE 13:25 FAX 6192826723 WONG ENGINEERING
OCT-17-2005 MON 04:25 PM CITY 'OF CRSLAD FAX NO, 760 6028558
l003
P. 02
lr~' C)%t
1
This form must be complet
prior to issuing a building p
Project Name:
Building Permit
Plan Check Number:
Project Address:
A.P.N:
Project Applicant
(Owner Name):
Project Description:
Building Type:
City of Carlsbad
ama M= s L
RT1Y1CATE OF COMPLIANC
the City, the applicant and the appropriate school districts and returned to the City
The City will not issue any building permit without a completed school fee form.
7~ &, r I—if ~ 7 re S - -
Residential: Number cif New D=Jljna Units V --
Square Feet of Living Area in New Dwelling
Second Dwelling Unit: Square Feet of Living Area In SDU
Residential Additions:
-
Net Square Feet New Area /338':
Commercial/industrial, Square Feet Floor Area
City Certification of
Applicant Information: Date;
Carlsbad Umlie4 School District San Maroe Unified School District
6225 El Camino Real 2lSMataWay
Carlsbad CA 92009 (331-5000) San Marcos, CA 92069(29-2649)
Cornect Nancy Dolce (By Aoet. Or
P-ncinims Union School Distrid\ San Dieguito Union High School District 10 South Rancho Santa Fe Rd ) 7t0 Eaciniras Blvd.
Encinitas, C 92024 (944-4304xt ]66) Encinitas, CA 92024(753-6491)
Certification of Appl flOwnfiT 7epersert executing this declaration ('Owcio() certifies under penalty of poijury that (1) the information provided above ía coimct and true to the boat of the Owners knowledge, and that tte Owner will file an amended certification of payment and pay the additional fee If Owner requests an increase in the number of dwelling unite or square footage after the building permit is issued or if the Initial determination of units or square footage Is found to be Incorrect, and that (2) the Owner is the ownerldeve(oper of the above described project(s), or that the person eYecudng this dedaration Is authorized to sign an behalf of the Owner. V
Signature:
Ru.vet 4/2 WOO
L - Date: -
1635 Faraday Avenue - Carlabaa, CA 92008-7314. (760) Building Counter • (760) 602-2719 • FAX (760) 602-
1/5j'O
10/18/05 TIJE 13:26 FAX 6192826723 WONG ENGINEERING 0006 OC1-I1'-2005 NON 04:26 PM CITY OF CRSLBD FAX NO. 760 602 8558 P. 05
A
/
I
SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL FEE CERTIFICATION
(To be completed by the school district(s))
A A A A
THIS FORM INDICATES THAT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROJECT HAVE BEEN OR WILL BE SATISFIED,
SCHOOL DISTRICT:
The undersigned, being duly authorized by the applicable School District, certifies that the deveiopôr, builder, or Owner has satisfied the obligation for school facilities. This is to certify that the applicant listed on page 1 has paid all amounts or completed other appHcabte school
mitigation determined by the School District. The City may' issue building permits for this project.
SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED
DISTRICT OFFICIAL
TITLE
NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT
DATE
PHONE NUMBER
Ai
I ENCINITAS UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT
101 SOUTH RANCHO SANTA FE R
4ENciNiTAs: CALIF.
-
92024-4303
-- - -
C-7 (o 0 T t/OO /(P (o -
Revised 4/20/00
Date
- -..-' 10/18/05 TUE 13:26 FAX 6192826723
JL1-1(-UUb NON 04:26 PM CITY OF CARSLBAD
WONG ENGINEERING
FAX NO. 760 602 8558
12 005
P. 04
v of Carl cit , I D (I B till dg
sbad
This form must be completed by the City, the applicant, and the appropriate school diatricto and returned to the City prior to issuing a building permit. The City will not issue any building permit without a completed school lee form.
Project Name:
Building Permit
Plan Check Number:
Project Address:
A.P.N.:
Project Applicant
(Owner Name):
Project Description:
Building Type:
55 O7O - 2-00••
liitrrn1ffIi
--
-Square Feet of Living Area in Now Dwelling
Second Dwelling Unit: Square Feet of Living Area in SDU
Residential Additions: Net Square feet New Area /33 g'
Commercial/Industrial,
City Certification of
Applicant information:
Square Feet Floor Area
Carlsbad Unified School District San Marcos Unified School District 6225 El Camino Real 215 Mats Way Carlsbad CA 92009 (331-5000) San Marcos, CA 92069 (29012649)
Encinitas Union School blstrjci Sat, Dtcguito UnioSchool )isrj (. 4 101 South Ranchu Santa FeRd 710 Encinitas Blvd : Encinitas, CA 92024 (944-4300 ext 166)~-----Bnclubas-CA-92021444--01Y
Certification of Applicant/Owners. The person executing this declaration rOwrter) certifies under penally of penury that (1) the information provided above IS correct and true to the best 01 the Owner's knowledge, and that the Owner will file an amended certification of payment and pay the additional fee if Owner requests an increase in the number of dwelling units or square footage after the building permit is Issued or If the Initial determination of units or square foolagai 18 lbund to be Incorrect, and that (2) the Owner is the owner/developer of the above described project(s), or that the person executing thie declaration is authorized to sign on behalf of the Owner.
Signature:
-
-- -_ Data:
- 115-AS
-. 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008.7314 • (760) 602-2700 is
RcvIad 4/20/00 buildinq Counter - (760) 602-2719 • FAX (760) 602-858
10/18/05 ThE 13:26 FAX 6192826'23' WONG ENGINEERING LJ004
CT172005 MON 04:2t PM CITY OF UARSLAD FAX NO 760 602 8558 P 03
SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL FEE CERTIFICATION
(To.-.be completed by the school district(s))
& & &&
THIS FORM INDICATSTHAT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE
PROJECT HAVE BEEN OR WILL BE SATISFIED.
SCHOOL DISTRICT:
The undersigned, being duly authorized bythe applicable School District certifies that the developer, builder, or Owner has satisfied the obligation for school facilities. This is to certify that the applicant listed On page .1 has paid all amounts or completed other apIicable school
mitigation determined by the School.District. The City ma/ Issue building: permits for this project.
SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED SCHOOL;
"
. DISTRICT OFFICIAL / 'dr
TITLE Eric J. Hall
-
Asst. Superintendent, Business
NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT
DATE
/jhip
PHONE NUMBER
_________________________
Pc.i3d 4/0/00 ...• -
MARTIN RES 1538 SF 1ST AND 2ND
STORY ADDITION
RESDNTL RAD
Lot#: MARTIN BRIAN C&KAREN B
BuUmm yw&
PLANNING
ENGINEERING
EXTM l
HAZMATIAIRQtJj
TO FROM
OTHER SEWER DISTR
JD- SCHOOL FORM
Y CFD FORM
PLAN COR.i
CORR
ILCORR
W/~ .5