Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2415 APPIAN RD; ; 85-61-2; PermitDECLARATIONS LENDER WORKER'SCOMPENSATlON 11 I 7 OWNERAUILDER " .-I m CONTRACTOR Green ~ 11) Flnance (2) Uata Process Yellow ~ Assessor Temporary File t 1 L T T 1 I 1 i I I I c 0 z - i i + ~- 1" t i I 1 "* .. I i L City of Carlsbad 1200 ELM, CARLSBAD, CA 92008 TEL. (619) 438-5525 MISCELLANEOUS RECEIPT LEGAL DESCRIPTION LI_ " ASSESSORS PARCEL NO PHONE ll-i CONTACT PERSON \ IWO . White - Applicant Yellow - File "1. ... . I ~. -. . " DEMOLITION HOUSE MOVING % PARKS AND RECREATION FEE PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE SCHOOL FEE - DISTRICT ._c_ -. Carlsbad Encinitas San Diego Sa" Marcos- CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY i' *WARNING: PLAN CHECK FEES. WHERE NO ACTIO& TAKEN B~!TH~ APPLICANT IN 180 DAYS AND NO BUILDING PERMi? IS ISSUED. ARE , FORFEITED TO THE CITY. . w FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION PLAN CHECK NUMBER: 85-61 DATE: 5-7-86 PROJECT NAME: ADDRESS: 2413/15/16 Appian PROJECT NO.: UNIT NUMBER: PHASE NO.: TYPE OF UNIT: SFD NUMBER OF UNITS: 3 CONTACT PERSON: Willis CONTACT TELEPHONE: 434-1685 -3- DATE INSPECTED: APPROVED DISAPPR~V~B __ INSPECTED DATE By: INSPECTED: APPROVED ~ DISAPPROVED __ INSPECTED DATE BY: INSPECTED: APPROVED - DISAPPROVED - COMMENTS: -Y FOR ALL DEPARTXENTS Ci“b i WHITE Suspense GREEN: Engineering CANARY: Utilitles PINK Planning GOLD Flre FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION PLAN CHECK NUMBER: 85-61 DATE 5- 7- 86 PROJECT NAME: ADDRESS: 2413/15/16 Appiarl PROJECT NO.: UNIT NUMBER: PHASE NO.: TYPE OF UNIT SFD NUMBER OF UNITS: 3 CONTACT PERSON: Willis- , CONTACT TELEPHONE: 434-1G85 INSPECTED DATE BY: INSPECTED: APPROVED ~ DISAPPROVED __ INSPECTED BY: INSPECTED: DATE APPROVED. ~ DISAPPROVED ~ INSPECTED BY: INSPECTED: DATE APPROVED __ DISAPPROVED - COMMENTS: READY FOR ALL DEPARTMENTS Rev. 1/88 ~ WHITE Suspense GREEN: Englneering CANARY Utlllties PINK Planning GOLD Fire - PLANNING: TYPE OF STRUCTURE . 5 /?A- #* 3 1 1985 SCHOOL FEES: SAN DIEGUITO ENCINITAG CARLSBADJ&~ f&@:de SAN MARCOS 'ITY OF CARLSBAD % COVERAGE REQU.IRED SETBACKS BUILDING HEIGHT FRONT ~ TWO CAR GARAGE REAR 0 REDEVELOPHENT k?P'iOVAL REQUIRED: : Ea &E r"J Ea W- -. " : n LANDSCAPE PLAN COMMENTS: ADDITIOHAL CONiYENTS: OX TO ISSUE:& . DATE:A$\:$ OK TO FINAL: - DATE: LEGAL DESCRIPT P.F.F. fl&&/& PARK IN LIEU R.0.W: "5 7- IMPROVEMENTS: . GRADING PERMIT: PUBLIC PORKS INSPECTOR: FINAL OK: DATE: IF THIS ITEM IS XOT CHECKED, BUILDING DEPARTMENT WILL MAKE ALL INSPECTIONS (DRIVEWAYS, CURB CUT, DRAINAGE, ETC.) DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES BUlLDlNG DEPARTMENT CARLSBAD. CALIFORNIA 92008-1989 1200 ELM AVENUE (619) 436-5525 7-2- 85 Carlsbad Dev. Co. P. 0. Box B Carlsbad, CA. 92008 Dear Sir: Re : In answer to your request of " , an -,j extension of 180 days has been granted to PC# 85-61 Appian Road 3 SFD'S I 1-24- 86 Section 304(c) of the 1979 Uniform Building Code prohib'its any further extension of time. Building and Planning MO: ky DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES CARLSEAD, CALIFORNIA 92008-198 1200 ELM AVENUE BUILDING DEPARTMENT ,' ' :" .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. .. . . . ... ,. (619) 438-5525 . '-'- '...' :' . ~~. . . .. Date: 7-2-85 To: .Carlsbad Dev. Co. 85-61 P. 0. Box B Carlsbad, CA. 92008 Subject: Plan Check Expiration . Our records indicate that you have not obtained your building permit for which you filed an application on the date shom,above. The provisions'of Section 304(c) of the Uniform Building Code state: .. Sec. 304(c) Expiration of Plan Check. Applications for which no permit is issued within 180 days following the date of application shall expire by applicant or destroyed by the Building Official. The Building Official may limitation and plans submitted for checking may thereafter be returned to the extend the time for action by the applicant for a period not exceeding 180 days upon written request by the applicant showing that circumstances beyond order to renew action on an application after expiration, the applicant shall the control of the applicant'have prevented action from being taken. In resubmit plans and pay a new plan check fee. For your convenience, please check the appropriate box below indicating your intentions and return this letter to the address above. - Project abandoned. I will pick up plans in 10 days. Signature Date - Project abandoned, plans may be destroyed. Signature Date - Maximum 180-day time extension requested for the following reason: If you have any questions, please contact the Carlsbad Building Department at I/ c 438-5525 Building Off i&d ESGIL CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO. CA 92123 (619) 5601468 DATE: A2!d/!/H 14. Jqd6 0 JURISDICTION 0 APPLICANT JURISDICTION: c,-w I < #?/'iJ 0 PLAN CHECKER PLAN CHECK NO: ~C.5 -L/ 7 0 UPS PROJECT ADDRESS: jf@&)J I+Ay 13 FILE COPY 0 DESIGNER The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's Building codes, when minor deficien- cies identified on the enclosed check list are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have major,deficiencies and resubmitted for a complete recheck. identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected .'€he check list transmitted herewith is the jurisdiction's Esgil Corp. until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. copy for your information. The plans are being held at The applicants copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to return to.the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil staff did not advise the applicant contact person that plan check has been completed. Esgil staff did advise applicant that the plan check has . been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted: Telephone X - REMARKS: _- - .. BY: .. ENCL:&~~,I~~ cm, ESGIL CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR.. SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO. CA 92123 (619) 5601468 DATE: ?GF=A=.uuarY 14, ,*8r - 0 JURISDICTION JURISDICTION: c+?isld&n 0 PLAN CHECKER PLAN CHECK NO: - z 0 UPS 0 FILE COPY 0 DESIGNER PROJECT ADDRESS: YP7/PU WAV The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes, when minor deficien- checked by building department staff. cies identified on the enclosed check list are resolved and The plans transmitted herewith have major deficiencies and resubmitted for a complete recheck. identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected The check list transmitted herewith is the jurisdiction's Copy for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corp.'until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicants copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to return to the applicant contact person. a The applicant's copy of the check list has been-sent .to: Esgil staff did not advise the applicant contact person that Plan check has been completed. 0 Esgil staff - did advise applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted: Telephone X REMARKS: -. 0 APPLICANT COPY a CITY COPY d5&/ Citp of Carkfiab 0 PLAN CHECKER COPY / a. Minimum tread is 6 inches ac any peinc and minimu. 9 inches at a point 11 inches from the ride of the stairray. b. M&.xilsum rise is 9 inches. c. Minimum width is IO inches. See. 1305(d) flee atcachedl e. xini- headmem ia 6 1s.e 6 inches. S.C. 3305(0 1a.a attachedl .. , .. TABLE 2-1. ALTERNATIVE COMPONENT PACKAGES FOR CLIHATE ZONE 7 Package Component BCILDISC ENVELOPE Insulation Mnimums Ceiling Wall1 Slab Floor Perimeter Raised Floor I Glaring I. Haximum U-value flaximum Total Non-South Haximum Total Area Hinimum South Facing Facing Area Area Themdl Yass SPACE COIDITIONINC SYSTM Hexirx System Type2 DOKESTIC WATER HEATINC SYSTDI TYPE A B C R 11 (R 2.5) R 19 no req'ment R 11 1.10 no req'ment 9.6% ., 6.4% required gas, heat pump, or solar VI any type of backup heat 0.65 14.0% no req',ment no req'wnt not req'd gar. heat pump, or solar VI any heat cype of backup R 19 no req'ment R 11 R 11 (R 2.si 14.0% 1-10 no req'wnt DO req'ment not req 'd gas backup solar with heat . 1. The value in parentheses is the R-value for the entire wall assembly if the wall veighc exceeds 60 pounds per square foot. The insulation nust be integral with or installed on the outside of the exterior mass. The inside surface of the thermal mass, including plaster or gypsum board in direct contact with the masonry wall. ahall be exposed to the room air. The exterior wall used to meet the R-value in parentheses cannot be used ta nert the above thermal mass requirement. L_ ~ ~ 2. Lhhcre natural gas is not available, zonally controlled electric rests- t~cie or radiant heating systems may be used. .. .' .. 1983, provides builders new options nnd Rdditional flexibility in cmplying with the energy conservation standards for new residential buildings. The principl features of the bill are described below: . GROUP AVERACING Builders may comply with the standards by averaging the performance of groups of buildings. All buildiws in an averaged group must be in the same subdivision, and all must be based on the Same model. Reverse plans and different elevations of a model are regarded as the same model. bildirgs based on the model and with the Same floorplan (including reverse plans) but vith different conservation features, such as shading, insulation levels, thernal CESS, etc, are still regarded as the Same model. Different models may not be grouped together for averaging. averaged group on the ~ama day, and each application must indicate the group to hilders I&IO elect u) average must apply for permits for all buildings in an by using either the Point %stem or any other approved calculation method, such which the averaging approach is applied. 'ihe builder demonstrates compliance as CALPAS 1A or CAL?AS j, to show that a sjlnple arithmetic average of the enerpy khcn the blrildirys are offered for sale, builders must also notify potential performance of all buildiws in the group meets the standards' enera budget. buyers th&t cwpliance with the energy standards used averaging and that the perfornance of a particular hone relative to the performance standard is available kwly enacted legislation (AB 163 [Goain]), which became bw on July 29, upon reqwst. NEW PACKAGES Builders may also use new pclg(;es enacted by AB 163, in place of Packages A, B, and C in the standards. The new packages for ea& Climate zone are fllmmarized in the TABLE attached to this notice. Notes explaining the pckages appar on Eage 2 of this notice. AXPERNATIVE PACKAGES AB 163 also allows builders to develop and use their performance as the new psckages in AB 1'63. To use this approach, builders may OW pckages of measures, provided such packages result in the same energy use either the Point System or another approved calculation method (e.&, CALPAS 1A or 3) w.3 follow these step: flaor an ircluding all of the components in an AB 163 pame (see attached 1. Calculate the energy consumption or pint system total of the building T-f Assume the building has the maximum mount of glazing allowed in that pc&e and that this glazing is equally distributed north, east, South, and west. 'his calculation sets the energy goal or standard that the propsed buildire must neet. Note: If the pint system is used, this goal will not necessarily be zero - points. 2. krf2:u the same cmptation, using the pi'opsed buildiw's actud duiW area, Grisntation, and distribution, and it:; actual energy conservation features. tetter than the goal wtablished in Step 1. The Jeslcn canplies if the energy consumption or pint system total is equal to or Mailed to lists 408. 409, 050. 053 on 8/15/83 . OlWEl PROVISIONS OF AB 163 with the mandatory features and devices requirements of the standards. The requirements appar in Section 2-5352 of Title.24, Wifornia c*Lplulatma.*+un hrrlm, 1. Regardless of the method of compliance, every buildirg must still comply .. 2. Any application for a building prmit pending on or after July 29, lWj, use any of the compliance methods in AB 163 to meet the new enera stdnrdo. 3. If a fireplace is not located near an exterior wall, outside canbustion air is not required in climate zones 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 14, and 15. Note that this provision of the bill is an express exanption for those olkoate zones fran the standards appars in Section 2-5352(d) of Title 24, Califorrdd Administrative outside caubustidn air requirement in the stardards. (The requirement in the Code.) mLAh'ATIONS OF THE ~UIFEKlXTS IN THE NEW AB 163 PACKAGE3 (See TABLE) The fOllOVing rrquirenrnts apply if builders elect to use the pkages in AB 163. (For requirkents of other pacaes or cmpliance lnethods, consult the standards or the hrrgy Conservation hual.) " - 1. All concrete slab floor buildings are required to have 25 percent of the floor area directly exposed to the conditioned space. To determine the floor area, count only the first floor in conditioned areas. Uncarwted first floor areas, such as lindlem or tiled entry ways, kitchens, bnthroams, and utility closets may all be counted towards this requirewent. 2. In some climate zones, a buildix with raised floors (rather than concrete Slab) muat also include thermal mass with an area exposed to the conditioned space equal to a certain percentage of the ground floor floor area. The prcentaee for each zone is listed in the attached TABLE. To qualify for thed us, the material used must have a performance equivalent to masonry two inches thick, with a volunetric heat capcity of 28 Btu per cubic foot pr degree Fahrenheit per hour, a therual conductivity of one Mu pr foot per foot pr degree Fahrenheit per hour, ard a surface area directly exposed to the rocn air of the required percentqe of the ground floor floor spce. A list of materials that meet these requirements is beit% developd by the Commission. 3. The attic requirement meam that an attic is installed under not less than 75 percent of the roof that is over any conditioned space. insthlied, but AB lc3 does not require that an air conditioner be installed. 4. The air conditioner efficiencies must be net if an air conditioner is 5. If a heat pmp is used, an automatic setback thermostat is required in clinate zocrs 1, 3, 5, 7, 15, and 16 if buildiw permits are applied for on or after ALL&xst 1, 1%. In all zones, an autcmatic setback thermostat is required for pnriits applied for on or after July 1, lY8Q. 6. Infilzraticn barriers and air-to-air heat exchangers are not required in ar\y clizate zoce by these pacwes. ' DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES BUILDING DEPARrUENr Qitp of CatIB'bab .. .; , THE INFORMATION LISTED BELOW MUST BE SHOWN ON THE TITLE SHEET OF THE PLANS FOR YOUR SINGLE FAMILY OWELLING ' ' Site Address Legal Description Assessor's Parcel Number Quantity of Grading in cubic yards Contact Person - Name and daytime Phone Number Circle any Planning Commission or City Council Action on this Property: Variance, Corditional Use Permit, Tract or Parcel Map, Zone Change. Planned Development, Redevelopment Permit, Specific Plan, Site Development Plan PLAN CHECK NUMBER cd 112383 ESGIL CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR.. SUITE 208 SAN DIECO, CA 92123 (619) 56014f33 DATE: G=RuArY A; ,*Br . 0 APPLICANT JURISDICTION: ~6?L564%0 PLAN CHECK NO: - z EJ~URISDICTION u UPS 0 FILE COPY 0 PLAN CHECKER 0 DESIGNER 0 0 0 a a 0 PROJECT ADDRESS: apr/Au WAV The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes, when minor deficien- cies identified on the enclosed check list are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have major deficiencies and resubmitted for a complete recheck. identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected The check list transmitted herewith is the jurisdiction's copy for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corp.'until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicants copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to return to the applicant Contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent .to: Esgil staff did not advise the applicant contact person that plan check has been completed. Esgil staff did advise applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: bate contacted: Telephone X REMARKS: Form 31584 0 APPLICam COPY a CITY COPY 0 PLAN CHECKER COPY d5& b. niniaum haad room is 6'-6'. C. Minimum width is 10.. .. . Swcified. Specify minimum pitch of Rwf pitch is mc adquilt. for roof type . Note on plan that hold dwn anchecr must '6 b. tied in place prior to foundation inspection. sac. 21121fl I I I TABLE 2-1. ALTERNATIVE COMPONENT PACKAGES FOR CLIMATE ZONE 7 Component BUILDISC ENVELOPE Insulation Mnimuns Wall1 Ceiling Raised Floor Slab Floor Perimeter I Glazing .. Maximum U-value Haximum Total Area Maximum Total Non-South Minimum South Facing Facing Area Area Thermal Sass SPACE COfiDITIONINC SYSTM HedciryI System Type2 DWSTIC WATER HPATINC SYSTM TYPE Package A B C R 11 (R 2.5) R 19 no req'ment R 11 1.10 no req 'me nt 9.6% 6.4% required gas, heat pump, or solar wl any type of backup heat 0.65 14.0% no req'ment no req'ment not req'd gar, heat pump, or solar VI any heat type of backup R 19 no reg 'ment R 11 R 11 (R 2.si 1.10 14.0% no req'ment no req'meot not req'd solar with gas backup heat 1. The value in parentheses is the R-value for the entire wall assembly if the wall weight exceeds 40 pounds per square foot. The luaulacion must be integral with or installed on che outsida of the exterior mass. The direct contact with the masonry wall. shall be expoaed to the room air. I.u:fde surface of the thermal mass, including plaster or gypsum board in The exterior wall used to meet the R-value in parentheses cannot be used ta neet the above thermal mass requirement. 2. :here natural gas is not available, zonally controlled electric resis- tJz:ie or radiant heating systems may be used. 48 'SI6 NINTH STREET AUG 19 1983 .*CR*MNlO. CAIlfOINIA 95814 NOTICE OF sPAf'UTOl?Y CHANGE3 FSCL cckmnxta:l ',MO~SIRLG cu IN TIiE RISIDEhnPIILL BUILDING STANDNIIx3 1983, provides builders new options and additional flexibility in complying with the energy conservation standards for new residential buildings. The princim features of the bill are described below: f!ewly enacted legislation (AB 163 [Go&I]), which becme law or! July 29, GROUP AVERAGING Builders may canply with the standards by avereging the performance of groups of buildings. All buildiws in an averaged group must be in the same subdivision, and all must be based on the same model. Reverse plans and different elevations of a model are regarded as the same model. hildings with different conservation features, such as shading, insulation levels, thermal based on the model and with the same floorplan (including reverse plans) but mass, etc, are still regarded as the same model. Different models may not be grouped together for averaging. hilders &o elect to average nust apply for permits for all buildings in an averaged group on the me day, and each application must indicate the group to which the averaging approach is applied. 'he builder demonstrates compliance by using either the Point System or any other approved calculation method, such as CWAS IA or CUPAS 3, to show that a simple arithmetic average of the enera performance of dl buildin@ in the group meets the standards' enera budget. khen the bcildirys are offered for sale, builders must &SO notify ptentid buyers tbt cmpliance with the energy standards used averaging and that. the perfomance of a prticular hone relative to the performance standard is available upon reqwst. place of hcka&es A, B, and C in the standards. Ihe new ph&S for each climate zone are mized in the "!J,E attached to this notice. Notes explaining the pckages appzar on pge 2 of this notice. . NEW PACKAGE3 Biilders my also use new PcWes enacted by AB 163, in ' ALTERNATIVE PACKACES AB 163 also allows builders to develop and use their performance as the new pckages in AB 163. To use this approach, builders my owl pckages of measures, provided such pckages result in the =e enera use either the Point System or another approved calculation method (e.g., CALF'AS 1A or 3) and follow these steps: nsor an ircluding all of the components in an AB 163 package (see attached 1. Calculate the enera consumption or pint system tom of the buildin(! TAELEf Assume the building has the maximum mount of glazing allowed in that west. lhis calculation sets the enera goal or standard that the props4 poc-e and that this glazing is equally distributed north, east, south, and buildire must meet. - Note: If the pint system is used, this goal will not necessarily be zero points. -7. krf-.:u the same canputation, usirg the pioposed building's actual &ziW area, ;rieatation, and distribution, and it:; actual enera conservation features. '2i1e Jrtsl~n canplies if the energy consumption or pint system total is q~l to or tetter than the goal established in Step 1. Mailed to lists 408. 409. 050. 053 on 8/15/83 PROVISIONS OF AB 163 Regardless of the method of compliance, every building nust still comply with the mandatory f~afmes and devices requirements of the standards. The requirements appear in Section 2-5352 of Title 24, California M+v;ninWaWvo DLI\IL, 2. Any application for a building prmit pending on or after July 29, 1983, use any of the compliance methods in AB 163 to meet the new enerm standards. 3. If a fireplace is not located near an exterior wall, outside canbustion air provision of the bill is an express exaaption for those olknate zones fran the is not required in climate zones 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 14, and 15. Note that this outside canbustion air requirement in the stanlards. (The requirement in the standards appears in Section 2-5352(d) of Title 24, California Administrative Code.) EXPLANATIONS OF THE REQUIREmm IN THE NXW AB 163 PACKAGES (See TABLE) The following requirments apply if builders elect to use the pckages in AB 163. (For requiraents of other ees or ccwpliance methods, consult the stnrdards or the hrrgr Conservation hual.) 1. All concrete slab floor buildings are required to have 25 percent of the floor area directly exposed to the conditioned space. To determine the floor areas, such as linolevn or tiled entry ways, kitchens, bathrooms, and utility area, count only the first floor in conditioned areas. Uncarpeted first floor closets may all be counted towards this requireuent. 2. In some climate zones, a luildirg with raised floors (rather than concrete . equal t0 a certain percentage of the ground floor floor area. The prcentaee for Slab) mt also include thermal mass with an area exposed to the conditioned space each zone is listed in the attached TAKE. To qualify for thermal mss, the material used must have a performance equivalent to masonry two inches thick, with a volunetric heat capcity of 28 Btu per cubic foot per degree mhrenheit per hour, a themal conductivity of one Etu per foot per foot per degree Fahrenheit percentage of the ground floor floor space. A list of materials that meet these Per hour, and a surface area directly expsed to the rocn air of the required requirements is being developed by the Commission. 3. The attic requirement means that an attic is installed under Mt less thm 75 percent of the roof that is over any conditioned space. instdid, out AB lc3 does not require that an air conditioner be installed. 4. The air conditioner efficiencies must be net if an air conditioner is cliaate zoms 1, 3, 5, 7, 15, and 16 if building permits are applied for on or 5. If a kat punp is used, an automatic setback thermostat is required in after Augyst 1, lm. In all zones, an autmatic setback themostat is required for pmits q&lied for on or after July 1, 1984. clizate 2or.e by these pacNes. 6. Infiltraticn barriers arid air-trpair heat exchangers are not required in any F ir ir 0) c c c c C &Y 0. . TI N I- C DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES BUlLDlNG DEPARTMENT Citp of Carlssbab i .. ', . THE INFORMATION LISTED BELOW MUST BE SHOWN ON THE TITLE SHEET OF THE PLANS FOR YOUR SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING Site Address Legal Description Assessor's Parcel Number Quantity of Grading in cubic yards Contact Person - Name and daytime Phone Number Circle any Planning Commission or City Council Action on this Property: Variance, Conditional Use Permit, Tract or Parcel Map, Zone Change, Planned Development, Redevelopment Permit, Specific Plan, Site Development Plan PLAN CHECK NUMBER cd 112383 Dates 2-14-35 Jurisdiction CMI4RAAD Prepared by I &lRY A~~EL VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE 0 Bldg. Dept. 0 Esgil PLAN CHECK NO. &-&I BUILDING ADDRESS APPIAN m0- fhIzcElA 1-2-4 APPLICANT/CONTACT RAVMWO PKIIIL UP, PHONE NO. 729- 9242 BUILDING OCCUPANCY R .3 DESIGNER PHONE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION TRACTOR PHONE Air Conditionina I I Commercial I@ I Residential I @ Res. or Corn. Fire Sprinklers Total Value Nt,&S3 @ ,. fee Adjusted To Reflect OEnergy Regulations (Fee x 1.1) OHandicapped Regulations (Fee x 1.065) 465. rn Building Permit Fee $- s Plan Check Fee $ s ZhL.33 - COHHENTS; 8/4/82 DUCO Engineering, Inc. FOUNDATION L GEOLOGIC INVESTIGATIONS FILL CONTROL. SOIL TESTIN0 1170 CENTRE DRIVE. SUITE F . WALNUT, CALIFORNIA 91789 (113) 964-3440 . 964-3449 July 10, 1980 Carlsbad Development Corp. P. 0. Box B Carlsbad, California 92008 Subject: Report of Compaction Tests Royal Homes No. 6 Elm Ave. at Appian Road Carlsbad, California . Job NO.: 0-141 Gentlemen: In accordance with your request this firm has inspected and tested the compac- ted fill placed on the subject site between June 12 and June 18, 1980. A plan of the site showing the test locations and other data pertinent to this report is attached as Figure No. 1. Reference data used in the preparation of this report consisted of a Grading Plan prepared by Brian Smith Engineering, Inc., dated May 5, 1980. The project was essentially a cut and export job with a minor amount of fill being placed on lot No. 1. Site preparation, grading and testing were conducted in the following manner: Site Preparation A. Surface debris and vegetation was stripped and hauled off site. B. No trees were existing on the site when we arrived. C. Existing fill soils were removed in the old road and errosinal area on lot No. 1. D. A 5' foot deep shear key was provided at the toe of the 2:l fill slope on lot No. 1. Benches were excavated into the bedrock as the fill progressed up slope. Grading A. Fill soils were spread in 4 to 6 inch loose lifts, watered as necessary and compacted to minimum requirements. B. The method used for adding moisture and compacting was a water truck and rolling with the track mounted grading equipment. DUCO ENGINEERING LOCATION OF SCALE I": /LC JOB NO. C-14 FIGURE NO. I 1170 CENTRE DR., SUITE F, WALNUT, CALIF. 'ZTEST DUCO ENGINEERING. INC. Test Lot No. Date No. - - - 1 6-12-80 2 3 4 5 6 6-18-80 11 11 ,I I, SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS Nat . - 254.0 253.0 Retest #l 260.0 258.0 260.0 Elevations Fin. Gr. Test - 262.0 257.0 255.5 11 260.0 258.0 262.0 %Moist. Field 11.9 11.9 13.0 12.4 9.8 9.9 lob No.: 0-141 Dry Den. Soil P.C.F. Field Type 96.7 A 105.6 B 101.9 A 105.7 A 113..5 C 110.4 C % Cornp 85.8 90.8 90.4 93.8 97.3 94.6 Carlrbad Homer Carlebrd Climate, Zone #7 FIelott F)ir Conditioning Title 24 Energy Calculations Compliance Method - CfiLPRS 3 January 23, 1985 Haynal and Company Escondido, CR 92026-0433 PO %on 263433 (617) 743-5408 (613) 273-7225 f-I September 4, 1980 Carlsbad Development Corporation 390 Oak Avenue Post Office Box B Carlsbad, Ca1,ifornia 92008 Attention: John E. McCoy Gentlemen: At its meeting of September 3, 1980, the Governing Board of this August 14, 1980 between the Carlsbad Development Corporation and the schooi district ratified and approved the secured agreement received district that was designed to assist with obtaining of needed school facilities. Your check for $1,029 is gratefully acknowledged. Attached is a photocopy of.the signed agreement, which includes date of ratification, regarding your proposed resubdivision which would create one additional building site. We appreciate your interest and cooperation. aw enc . /- .'FJp A&j!q$>3 e-;-.> Carlsbad unified School District ,BOARD OF TRUSTEES JAMES McCORMlCK President JOHN I. MAMAUX vice President JULIANNE L NYGMRD Clerk JOE ANGEL Member 1. EDWARD SWITZER. JR. Member DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION THOMAS K. ERIERLEY. EdB. Superintendent JAMES M. STARK Oepuw Superintendent Burinerr Services SUSAN-HARUM1 BENTLEY Arrirtant Superintendent InllrUCtiOd %Nicer DAVID WM. BATES. SR. Director Employee Relations KC. DUNIAP FacilitierIServicer Manage, December 19, 1985 Carlsbad Development Corp. P.O. Box B Carlsbad, CA 92008 Subject: School Fees From information furnished us by the City of Carlsbad, we note that you applied for and were issued on November 1, 1985 building permits for 3 single family dwellings located at 2413, 2415, and 2416 Appian Road. It is required that contributions of $3,000 per unit be paid to Carlsbad Unified School District at the time the building permit is applied for and issued. It is further required that any payments not made by the developer when due and payable shall bear interest at the rate of seven (7) percent per annum. will be most helpful to us if you will advise us within the We are, therefore, calling this matter to your attention. It week as to your arrangements for providing the District with the contributions. The check should be made out in favor of the Carlsbad Unified School District in the amount of $9,052.50 ($3,000.00 per unit x 3 units = $9,000 + $52.50 interest). problem in connection with this matter, as we would like to Please call me at (619) 434-0610 in the event there is some get it resolved. Sincerely, & &tilQpL 3 Nancy Gillespie Business Services c: Martin Orenyak, Bldg. i% Planning Dir., City of CarlsbadJ Mr. Carter Darnell, Plan Checker, City of Carlsbad RECEIVED DEC2 1 1?85 CITY OF CARLSBAD , - Building Department Distinguished School Board Award 1984, United States Department of Education 390 Oak Avenue Carlsbad, CA 9200'8 Trn;T-- - * .. .. . and .. - . . .* c, mrlyms, ncvclopcr propoaca to c0ml;'ruct 3) Parcels are Lot # 1 ofcarlsbad Tract 76-2, Map NO. 8581 and Resubdivide.3 lots t'o create 4 R-1 building sites. Present 3 Parcels 3 and 4 of Parcel Map # 7990 -2- . the Mstrict agreea Co provide an4 nerviccs ~11:. be R.vt?ilehie mauranccn that school facilities to meet the heeds of' the f'uture rcnlrkntn af' the dcvclopncnt as it is presently proposed. 1. The hcvcloper ahall pay to the bistrlck the bun of for each dwelling unit to be constructed In-the Development. 'he number of firell9.ng units to be.,conotmct@d shall be determined from the approved subdivision map of the bevtlopmcnt, hn recorded in tho offlcc of the County Recordr. The term l'dtrclling unit" 68 used in this aSrc5mont means a place of ptsidence'*and may ' be lOCahl in either n single or multiple dwelling unit buildinc. Such paymentfi shall be mnEe in accordance wlth the lollowj.n[: * prov38iona : , :. 1.1. The total amount due hcl;eunder shall be paid ' to tlle district in installments equal to $1 0' .OCtimes the (or whatever am is in effect at time building % per ts are issued) number of d.;rellln[: units for which buildlng permits are Issuec! wtll the totR1 hmaunt as Apeelfie8 in paragraph !. ' : abovc.hm been paid or untjl the agreement ban been cnrrcclrt? by mutual consent due to the abnndonnant of a portion of thc Devclopmcnt. Such installmcnts shall be C.te end payah1.e - 3- percent per anhum. 2, 'phe Ownet and bovolapar may ifi the future offer to bonata a nchool sits in lie: of all or path 'of the financial obligatlon agreed upon in prtagraph 1~ dWc, *hiah bffcr the bisttict shall consider but id not abiigated tu 4Iecept. 9. To secure Developer's obligatia hereUndbft Developer rhall provide to bintrlct the securities @hll@d fbr in sub- paragrnph 3.1 or 3,2 or 3.31 3.1. A 8urcty bond 1n.Zavor of Bistrict in a form aoaeptahlo to District from an insurer acceptable to bistrict in the rum"of $ to insure h?velopcr8n pnrfamancc of the tern0 bf thib agreement. 2/ . . ... . 3.2 A bank or savings and loan time certificate of I .. Uepooit in the amaunt'of $ in a form 8Caeptable to District. naming the bistrict hb an-lrre~~oca!~l P .. .' ansignec for the tern of this agrccmatrt, akd QRpreaely .. proviaing that any interest accrtrinq on .the time certificate Of deposit shall be solely the pr6petty of dcpoeitor and the bifitrict shall have no rightu te any such interest. 5,' 3.3 Gt~ch other eecurlty an may be acceptable to. the blstrict, - !V 4. ' bistrict agrees to provide school facilities and servfees vhjch will be available to meet the heeds of the future rcsjicnta of the areas to bc dcvelopcd 8s dcscribcd heroin. bi!:trict further agrees to prevfda In writing for far releasing 'ths stourity provided to Bietrict pursuat~t to peragrnph 3 hcrcof. *. a. 6.' hy notice Prom one @arty to tha ether ahall be in nritihg, and ahnil be dated and signed by the party giving 'such notice or by a duly Ruthorlzcd reprcacntatlve oT .s~ieh rkrty. Any such notice uhall hot be effective for any purpose Whatsocvcr unleso berved in one of the folioHing monners: 6.1. If hetlcc is given to the bietrict, by personal dalivcyr thereof to the biatrict or by deposltlng the lame in the United States thil, nddrcssrd to the blstrfct; et thc address act Forth hcrcfn, ehcloaed in h bealcd envclopc eddressed to the blstrlct for attention of the Su~~r!nl~.n~lrnt, pnr,t,p.?.c prcpnirl ~r4 csrtlfied. . -5- .. . -. Mail, chcldrwd lh a scaled envelope addreabed to euch surety OF pcraon at the address at trbich such bupety or psrson last aomuhicdted to the part# Elving hotlce, posthce prepaid and cirtiflcd; .. 7. %io AEreemcht ahall be binding @On hnd ahttll 'inure io thb bcneflt of, and Bhhll apply tb, the respective *Btrcccoaof.B and esslgne of Developer and the bistr?.ct, ahd .... - . above. 4 .. . . I rntOPETI t CARLSBAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION September 3 I 19?& ., . .. 1 I I I I OM AYENUE. WlTE 0 2147 . .._ ENGlNEERiNG DEPARTMENT 438.6541 1 FOR APPLICANT TO'FILL tN CONTRACTOR'S AUDRESS " LATERAL NO. ., . . ' iNSTALLATiMV DATE ','I . I' .t .? . ' .. LATERAL CHARGE COMPUTATION ,' , +: STANDARD 4" (Max OVER 3v +I.- OVER 1W'V.- STANDARD 6" 1M.x. . , ,, ,: , -. . ,* FT. .. TOTAL LATERAL CHAROE ,. Page One July 10, 1980 Job NO.: 0-141 Testing A. Field density tests were performed in accordance with ASTM test method D1556. The results of these tests, taken during the course of grading are attached as a part of this report. B. Maximum density and optimum moisture were determined for each type of fill soil in accordance with ASTM test method D155.7-70. The results of determined in accordance with U.B.C. test standard 29-2, are as follows: these determinations along with the expansion potential of the soils, Soil Type Max. Den. Opt. Moist. Expan. Index A - Clayey sand 112.7 14.9 148 B - Sandy clay 116.3 12.6 90 C - Clayey silt ti gravelly sand 116.7 12.3 88 Conclusions and Recommendations The expansion potential of the onsite soils that will directly affect shallow foundations and slabs is considered very high. Remedial construction measures to minimize this condition are recommended as follows: Footings shall be continuous under all exterior and interior bearing walls and shall be imbedded a minimum depth of 24 inches below the lowest adjacent ground in the top and in. the bottom. surface. Reinforce the continuous footings with a minimum of mebar placed Concrete floor slabs shall be a minimum of 4 inches thick and shall be rein- forced with 6x6 - .6x6 welded wire mesh plac<d at midpoint in the slab. Floor slabs shall =cast on a 8 inch thick layer of graded aggregate base course 01 clean sand. _I The subgrade soils below proposed living area floor slabs shall be premoistened to in excess of optimum moisture condition to a depth of 24 inches prior to'the pouring of the concrete. The recommended soil bearing value for continuous footings a minimum of 12 in- ches in width and imbedded a minimum depth of 24 inches below the lowest adja- cent finished grade shall be 1500 P.S.F. The foregoing values are for dead and live loads and may be increased 1/3 for temporary horizontal forces. It is the opinion of this firm that the fill soils placed on the subject site, as reported herein, have been properly compacted for their intended use. Respectfully submitted, DUCO ENGINEERING, INC. Approved by: ..&_ ~ -.- . . . ., , . Ronald Cobine