The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2420 PIO PICO DR; ; CB091204; PermitCity of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 09-1 0-2009 Residential Permit Permit No: CB091204 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 Job Address: 2420 PlO PICO DR CBAD Permit Type: RESDNTL Sub Type: RAD Status: ISSUED Parcel No: 1561100100 Lot #: 0 Applied: 07/21/2009 Valuation: $431,160.00 Construction Type: 5B Entered By: KG Occupancy Group: Reference #: Plan Approved: 09/10/2009 # Dwelling Units: 0 Structure Type: Issued: 09/10/2009 Bedrooms: 0 Bathrooms: 0 Inspect Area: Project Title: HEITCHEW RES 3267 SF ADDTION Orig PC#: TO 1ST&2ND FLRS,718 GARAGE ADDITION,550 Plan Check# DECKS,550 PATIO CVR,PANEL UPGRADE TO 400 AMPS Applicant: CHIN JAMES HEITCHEW STEVEN M 2120 JIMMY DURANTE ( DEL MAR CA 92014, CARL6BAftC92008LJ 858-755-5863 C) Building Permit . / / $1854.41 Meter Size Add'l Building Permit Fee / $0.00 AddI Red. Water Con. Fee \ $0.00 Plan Check / / $1,205.37 Meter Fee \ \ $0.00 AddI Plan Check Fee f / $0.00 SDCWA Fee r \ $0.00 Plan Check Discount / / $0.00 CFD Payoff Fee \ $0.00 Strong Motion Fee / $43.12-...,,,,PFF (3105540) $0.00 Park in Lieu Fee / $0.00 PFF'(4305540) I $0.00 Park Fee j f $0.00 License Tax (3104193) $0.00 LFM Fee I I $O.O0 License Tax (4304193) . $0.00 Bridge Fee $0.00 \ Traffic Imact Fee (3105541) j $0.00 Other Bridge Fee $000 \ Traffic I&ipact Fe(4305541) J . / $0.00 BID #2 Fee $0.00 S Sidewalk J / f $0.00 BTD#3 Fee \ $0 T .oO\ PLUMBINGOTALILLI / f $146.00 Renewal Fee $0'OO ELE CTRICALTOTAL"-' / / $60.00 Add'I Renewal Fee \ \ $0.00 MECHANICAL!JOTAL / / $78.50 Other Building Fee \ . \ $0.00 Housing Ipct Fee / / $0.00 HMP Fee \ $0..010 C 0 0ousing lnLieu Fee / . / $0.00 Pot. Water Con. Fee \ N. $0.00 -Housing Credit Fee ,/ / $0.00 Meter Size \ '... Master Drainage Fee / $0.00 Add'l Pot. Water Con. Fee \ $0.00 Sewer Fee .- / $0.00 Red. Water Con. Fee 4 $0.O0-Additional Fees / $0.00 Green Bldg Stands (SB 1473) Fee $16.00) j--..-.-----ç)\' U OTAL PERMIT FEES $3,403.40 Total Fees: $3,403.40 Total Payments To Date: $3,403.40 Balance Due: $0.00 FINAL APP VA InsD 'ector Date: /1' / / Clearance: NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the Imposition of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as fees/exactions. You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity changes, nor planning; zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project. NOR DOES IT APPLY to any 1, Building Permit Application Plan Check No. '(?~0420 CITY OF 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008 Est-Value , %'3f (A DI RA n Fax: 760-602-8558 fl . www.carlsbadca.gov . Plan Ck. Deposit / )'/3, 5 Date 7—,2-/.--ô f' ADSADDRESS 4z) 1710 (7 . SUITE#/SPACE#/UNIT# APN . a CT/PRre 77771 LOT # PHASE if if OF UNITS if BEDROOMS SI BATHROOMS TENANT BUSINESS NAME CON TR. TYPE 0CC. GROUP DESCRIPTION OF WORK: Include Square Feet of Affected Area(s) .. . __ s,f. Lu— Aooq- 1t s AOpc "- EXISTING USE, USE PROPOSED USE "GARAGE (,9 . (SF) .7gk PATIOS (SF)' ç DECKS (SF) STP. FIREPLACE YES# NOD AIR CONDITIONING YES.'[] . NO', FIRE SPRINKLERS YES 0 NO' CONTACT NAME (If Different Fern Applicant) . - . .•. ... APPLICANT NAME U - ADDRESS . ADDRESS \ CITY, . STATE ZIP CtDj . . Z PHONE FAX . PN is-c ç FAX EMAIL . .. EMAIL 'V}i 1s )ikc, -o,- PROPERTYP /4 : CONTRACTOR BUS. NAME . ADDRESS ADDRESS CITY •f2i 4i7 STA •.ZIP CITY ' . STATE . ZIP ) 72.-1—içi FAX PHONE - FAX EMAIL . . EMAIL ARC /DESIGNER N & ADD SS +iAfi . a-tC . STATE LIC. # STATE LIC.#- . CLASS CITY BUS. LIC.# Cloc. 103.5 Eni,ess and Professions Code: Any City or'County. which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such pyrmit to file a signed statement that he is licensed .pursuans to the provisions of the Contractors license Law ((hapter 9, commending with Section 1000 of Division 3 of the 0osineos and professions Code} or that he is exempt shore from, and the basis for the alleged noemption. Any violation of Section 1031.5 by any .applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars {$500}). _ . Workeré'Cmpensation Declaration: lherebyaffinn under penally of per!uiy one of the following declarations: . . . 1] I have isnd will maintain a certificate of consent to self.lnsure for workers' compensation as prävided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My workers' compensation insurance carrier and policy .ni.mbmr are: Insurance Co. ___. Policy No. Expiration Date This 30cti00 need not be completed it the permit is for one hundred dollars ($100) or less. )J Cerliftcale of Exemption: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, 1. shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compeisation Laws of California.: WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shalt Subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars (&100,000), In addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney'è fees.. - CONTRACTOR SIGNATURE . . , . -'S , DATE . I hereby affirm that lam exempt from Contractor's License Law for the following reason: .- . 0 I, as cwner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sate (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's Licer;.ne Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself .orlhrough his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. It, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). O I, as coiner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and.Protessions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply loan owner of pro;torly *hO builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). I art &xempl under Section -Business and Professions Code for this reason: - IA personally plan to provide the major labor and maleriaiv for construction of the proposed properly improvement. 0 Yes 0 No 2:1 (have! have not) signed an application toes building permit for the proposed work. . . . 3.1 have contracted with the I Ilowing person.(firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name address! phone! contractors' license number): 4. I plan to grovide p I the worbul I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name! address phone contractors' license number): 5 5 e o ork but I have contra ted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name! address! phone \..PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE . .. . . DATE 11t Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? DYes 0 No - ' -- . - Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? 0 Yes 0 No.. Is the facility lobe constructed within 1,000 feet at the outer boundary of a school site? .0 Yes 0 No IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. (hereby affirm that there is a ccnsiructioTi lending agency for the performance of the work this permit is issued (Sec. 3097 (i) Civil Code). I - Lender's Name . - . . Lender's Address ,. . . . . . . . jfj(P/ I certify that l have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. t agmeto comply with all CRY ordinances and State laws relating to bit tiding construction. thereby authorize representative of the City of Casbad to enter Upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: AnOSHA permit is required for excavations over 50' deep and demolition or construction of strictures over 3 stories in height EXPIRATION,: Every permit issued Building Official rthe provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days frr' the dateof such ~_y itorO f)j g - o authorized by such permitis suspendedorabandoned at anytime afterthe work is commenced fora period of 180days (Section 106.4.4 Unform Building Code). A?SAPPLANT'S SIGNATU DATE 7 /0? . Permit Type: BLDG-Residential Application Date: 07/21/2009 Owner: STEVEN HEITCHEW Work Class: Addition Issue Date: 09/10/2009 Subdivision: Status: Closed - Finaled Expiration Date: 09/05/2017 Address: 2420 Pio Pico Dr Carlsbad, CA 92008 IVR Number: 674958 Scheduled Actual Inspection Type Inspection No. Inspection Status Primary Inspector Reinspection Complete Date Start Date 05/16/2017 BLDG-Final 023531-2017 Passed Peter Dreibelbis Complete Inspection Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed BLDG-Building Deficiency Yes BLDG-Plumbing Final Yes BLDG-Mechanical Final Yes BLDG-Structural Final Yes BLDG-Electrical Final Yes 03/09/2017 03/09/2017 BLDG-17 Interior 015961-2017 - Passed Peter Dreibelbis Complete Lath/Drywall Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed BLDG-Building Deficiency Yes 05/16/2017 05/16/2017 BLDG-97 Disabled 023454-2017 Requested Peter Dreibelbis Incomplete Accessibility Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed BLDG-Building Deficiency No ) May 16, 2017 - Page 1 of 1 Inspection List Permit#: CB091204 Type: RESDNTL RAD HEITCHEW RES3267 SF ADDTION TO 1ST &2ND FLRS,718 GARAGE ADDITI Date Inspection Item Inspector Act Comments 10/13/2016 17 Interior Lath/Drywall PD PA 12/01/2015 17 Interior Lath/Drywall PD AP 11/20/2015 17 Interior Lath/Drywall PD CA 07/24/2015 17 Interior Lath/Drywall PD AP 02/09/2015 17 Interior Lath/Drywall PD AP 08/05/2014 17 Interior Lath/Drywall PD AP 03/17/2014 16 Insulation PD AP 09/26/2013 68 Fireplace/Tie Straps PY NS 09/24/2013 13 Shear Panels/HD's PD AP 09/24/2013 15 Roof/Reroof PD AP 07/16/2013 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PD AP 01/28/2013 16 Insulation PD AP 01/24/2013 16 Insulation PY CA 07/24/2012 23 Gas/Test/Repairs PD 'AP 05/08/2012 16 Insulation PD NR 11/10/2011 16 Insulation PD WC 11/10/2011 84 Rough Combo PD PA UPSTAIRS 05/03/2011 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin PD PA 05/03/2011 24 Rough/Topout PD PA 11/02/2010 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin PD PA HDR, INT SHR 10/27/2010 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin PD CO NO ONE HOME 08/26/2010 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin PD PA GRG BALCONY - ON CARD 01/25/2010 13 Shear Panels/HD's PD AP 12/23/2009 15 Roof/Reroof PD AP 12/22/2009 15 Roof/Reroof PD NR 1:30 ON 12-22 10/09/2009 34 'Rough Electric ' PD AP TSPB 09/21/2009 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PD AP NEED SOILS LETTER 09/11/2009 21 Underground/Under Floor MP AP Thursday, May 25, 2017 Page 1 of 1 EsGil Corporation In Partners/lip with government for Building Safety DATE: 9/9/09 JURISDICTION: City of Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 091204 SET: III LICANT U JURIS. U P AN REVIEWER U FILE PROJECT ADDRESS: 2420 Plo Pico PROJECT NAME: Heitchew Residence Remodel & Addition The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted fora complete recheck. LII The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. LI The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person ç' L, (_/ REMARKS: City (Mr. Peterson) will the gas isometric. By: David Yao Enclosures: EsGil Corporation LGA EIEJ EIPc log 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 4 Fax (858) 560-1576 ( .1 EsGil Corporation In (Partnership with covernmentforBui&hng Safety DATE: 9/9/09 JURISDICTION: City of Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 091204 SET: III PROJECT ADDRESS: 2420 Pio Pico PROJECT NAME: Heitchew Residence Remodel & Addition PJ OAANT JURIST") PtNEVI EW ER C3 FILE LII The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. LI The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. LII The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. LI The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: James Chinn 2120 Jimmy Durante Blvd. #114 Del Mar, CA 92014 'e-mail: jameschinn400©gmail.com Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: James Chinn Date contacted: (by: j Mail — Telephone Fax In Person 1111 REMARKS: By: David Yao EsGil Corporation [1 GA LIEJ E:1 PC Telephone #: 858-755-5863. Fax #: Enclosures: 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576 I City of Carlsbad 091204 9/9/09 RECHECK CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: City of Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 2420 Plo Pico DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 9/8 REVIEWED BY: David Yao PLAN CHECK NO.: 091204 SET: III DATE RECHECK COMPLETED: 9/9/09 FOREWORD (PLEASE REAP): This plan review is limited to thetechnicaI requirements contained in the Building Code, Plumbing Code, Mechanical Code, Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. The approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction onthis sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews. The original correction number has been given for your reference. In case you did not keep a copy of the prior correction list, we have, enclosed those • pages containing the outstanding corrections. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? DYes DNo ) City of Carlsbad 091204 . 9/9/09 - Please make all corrections, as requested in the correction list. Submit threenew complete sets .of plans for commercial/indtistrial projects (two sets of-plans for residential projecth). For expeditious processing,' corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calcuIations!report directly to the City Of Carlsbad Building Department, 1.635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to- EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. - Bring one corrected set of -plans and calculations/-rei5orts to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858)560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the Cit' df-Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Department NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Co.rpdration only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments untilreview.by EsGil Corporation is complete. Provide gas isometric for the project. (tankless water heater requires big gas demand. The existing gas line may be undersize) The gas isometric did not match the floor plan. Please provide gas -mete location and show the gas isometric match the floor plan (water heater and FAU- next to each other the branch may be under size any other gas appliance (fireplace?) The isometric Drovicled does not match the floor 'Dian layout on the .olans. Your gas piping design must show gas input loads, (furnace is 90,000 on floor plans, 50,000 on latest submittal), all appliances (range is missing), thefloor plan appliance layout does not match either gas piping plan layout for appliance placement (the water heater is 25' from-the furnace?), and the water heater has a large gas input load.that has not been taken into account an either plan. Provide one single gas piping design on the plans with the above referenced corrections. - To speed up the review process, note on this list (o•a-copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, noteor detail number, .calculation. page, etc. Please indicate here if any changes have beeh made to the plars that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the p1ans . -,.. Have changes been made-to the plans riot resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: Yes U - No.D - _•i••• ,- - The jurisdiction has contractedwith-Esgil Corporation- locted at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 San Diego California 92123 telephone number of 858/560-1468 to perform City of Carlsbad 091204 9/9/09 the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact David Yao at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. EsGil Corporation In Partnersfiip with government for Bui&ing Safety DATE: 9/2/09 JURISDICTION: City of Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 091204 SET:!! PROJECT ADDRESS: 2420 Pio Pico PROJECT NAME: Heitchew Residence Remodel & Addition Q APPLICANT O-J'JURIDS UtN REVIEWER U FILE Liii The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. El The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's.building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted -herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. LI The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: V James Chinn 2120 Jimmy Durante Blvd. #114 Del Mar, CA 92014 J'X M93 C.,.H,N111J 400 4 C —4 FL-. U M Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: James Chinn Date contacted:9' 1z I o 9 (by: c_ ) - Mail - Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS: By: David Yao EsGil Corporation EGA flEJ LIPC Telephone #: 858-755-5863 Fax #: Enclosures: 8/27 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 0 San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 0 Fax (858) 560-1576 City of Carlsbad 091204 9/2/09 RECHECK CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: City of Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 2420 Pio Pico DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 8/27 REVIEWED BY: David Yao PLAN CHECK NO.: 091204 SET: II DATE RECHECK COMPLETED: 9/2/09 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Building Code, Plumbing Code, Mechanical Code, Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. The approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon Which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews. The original correction number has been given for your reference. In case you did not keep a copy of the prior' correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding corrections. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? DYes DNo Pity of Carlsbad 091204 9/2/09 Please make all corrections, as requested in the correction list. Submit three new complete sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 16. The garage headers along line 1 and 2 support the roof bearing wall and point load at end of shear panel. Please double check the floor beams along line 1 and 2 at garage. The response shows "see calcs sht. X-1". No calculation sheet X-1 was provided. Provide gas isometric for the project. (tankless water heater requires big gas demand. The existing gas line may be undersize) The gas isometric did not match the floor plan. Please provide gas meter location and show the gas isometric match the floor plan (water heater and FAU next to each other the branch may be under size any other gas appliance (fireplace?) To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: Yes L11 No U The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact David Yao at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. EsGil Corporation. In Partnership with Government for Building Safety DATE: 7/30/09 JURISDICTION: City of Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 091204 SET: I PROJECT ADDRESS: 2420 Plo Pico PROJECT NAME: Heitchew Residence Remodel & Addition ANT LI JURIS LI PLAN REVIEWER U FILE LI The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. El The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. LI The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on'the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted, for recheck. El The applicant's copy of the cheôk list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the 'Check list has been sent to: James Chinn 2120 Jimmy Durante Blvd. #114 Del Mar, CA 92014 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Z Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: J mes Chinn Date contacted 'f39O? (bJ email V'fi,phon Fax In Person III. REMARS!' By: David Yao EsGil Corporation LIGA IJEJ [:1 PC Telephone #: 858-755-5863 Fax #: Enclosures: 7/23 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite '208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576 City of Carlsbad 091204. 7/30/09 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES PLAN CHECK NO.: 091204 JURISDICTION: City of Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 2420 Plo Pico FLOOR AREA: Living addition 3267 sf Garage addition 718 sf Deck 550 sf patio cover 550 sf REMARKS: DATE PLANS RECEIVED-BY JURISDICTION: DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED: 7/30/09 STORIES: 2 HEIGHT: . . DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 7/23 PLAN REVIEWER: David Yao FOREWORD. (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the tech nical.requiremerits contained in the International Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical. Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Present California law mandates that construction comply with the 2007 edition of the California Building Code (Title 24), which adopts the following model codes: 2006 IBC, 2006 UPC, 2006 UMC and 2005 NEC. . The above regulations apply, regardless of the code editions adopted by ordinance. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 105.4 of the 2006 International Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. . To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. City of Carlsbad 091204 7/30/09 Please make all corrections, as requested in the correction list. Submit three new complete sets of plans for commerôial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of'plans and calculations/reports directly, to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake' Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building 'Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire' Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning; Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. EXITS, STAIRWAYS, AND RAILINGS Provide stairway and landing details. Section 1009.(What is the rise and run for the two new stairway?) Maximum rise is 7-3/4" and minimum run is A nosing not less than .75 inch but-not more than 1.25 inches shall be provided on stairways.with solid, risers where the tread depth is less than 11 inches. . ROOFING 2. Show the required attic ventilation on the plans. Show area required" and "area provided." The net free ventilating area shall not, be less that 11150th of the area of the space ventilated. Further, 50% of the opening area must be provided with ventilators in the upper portion (at least 3' above eave or cornice) with the balance of ventilators provided by eave or cornice vents. Exception: 1/00th ventilation area is permitted where, in addition to the requirements above, a vapor retarder is installed on the warm side of the attic insulation. Section 1203.2. ' . GARAGE AND CARPORTS 3. Garage floors shall be sloped to drain to the, main vehicle entry door or an approved drainage system: Section 406.1.3'. City of Carlsbad 091204 7/30/09 . FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that-the foundation plan, grading plan and speOifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soils report are properly incorporated into the construction documents (seepage 10 of the soil report). Specify on the foundation plan or structural specifications sheet the soil classification, the soils expansion index-and the design bearing capacity of the foundation. Section A106.1.1. 6; Detail 17/D-1 shows slab reinforced with #3(18"o.c. Page 9 of the soil report shows #3(16"o.c. Please revise the detail. 7. Detail 17/D-1 shows 6-mil waterproof membrane. Page 9 of the soil.. report requires 10=mil visqueen moist barrier. Please check. 8. The soils engineer recommended that he/she review the foundation excavations. Note on the foundation plan that "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building Department foundation inspection, the soils engiheer shall advise the building official in writing that: The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report, The utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and The foundation excavations, the soils expansive -characteristics and bearing capacity conform to the soils report." 9. . Note on plans that surface water will drain away from building and show-drainage pattern. The grade shall fall a minimum of 5% within the first 10 feet (2% for impervious surfaces). Section 1803.3. 10. Sill plate size and anchorage. FI Anchor bolts shall be provided with square washers in accordance with Section 2305.3,11. e xIJ bti~ the plan (revise detail 1/7) .11. Show embedment of hold down anchors on foundation plan. Section A106.1.1.(HDU5 and HDU8) Show minimum under floor access of 18 inches.by24 inches. IBC, Section 1209.1. • . . . .• Show minimum under floor ventilation. equal to a 1 sq. ft. for each 150 sq. ft. of under floor area. Openings shaft be placed so as to provide cross ventilation of under-floor space. IBC, Section 1203.3. . City of Carlsbad 091204 7/30/09 FRAMING Sheet 9 of the plan appears to not show hold down for the 6 feet and 4.6 feet panel along line 1. Please clarify. Provide detail to show how the shear wall at roof level supported by the floor beam? and reference the detail. The garage headers along line 1 and 2 support the roof bearing wall and point load at end of shear panel. Please double check the floor beams along line 1 and 2 at garage. The 6 feet shear wall along line 2 between and C will be supported by the floor joist. Please double check the floor joists can support the extra load. . ELECTRICAL Show on the plan the amperage of the electrical service, the location of the service panel and the location of any sub-panels. If the service is over 200 amperes, submit a single line diagram, panel schedules, and provide service load calculations. . PLUMBING Provide gas isometric for the project. (tankless water heater requires big gas demand. The existing gas line may be undersize) . MISCELLANEOUS To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed., i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans: Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: Yes El No U 22. . The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any City of Carlsbad 091204 7/30/09 questions regarding these plan review items, please contact David Yao at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. City of Carlsbad 091204 7/3Q/09 [DO NOT PAY —THIS IS NOT AN INVOICE] VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: City of Carlsbad PREPARED BY: David Yao BUILDING ADDRESS: 2420 Pio Pico BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R-3/U PLAN CHECK NO.: 091204 DATE: 7/30/09 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V-B BUILDING PORTION AREA (Sq. Ft.) Valuation Multiplier Reg. Mod. VALUE ($) living addition 3267 1 21 .94 398,378 garage 718 26.61 19,106 deck 550 14.41 7,926 patio cover 550 8.87 4,879 Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE 430,288 Jurisdiction Code 1cb IBY Ordinance Bldg. Permit Fee by Ordinance Plan Check Fee by Ordinance jj Type of Review: LI Complete Review LI Structural Only I $1,708.411 I $1,110.471 LI Repetitive Fee Repeats LI] Other LI Hourly Hr. © * EsGil Fee Comments: Sheet 1 Of 1 macvalue.doc + of Carlsbad BUILDING .PLANCHECK CHECKLIST DATE: BUILDING ADDFEss: 2i-42-0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ___ ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: PLANCHECK NO o k7 CO EST. VALUE: J-fIII24 0 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to build. Li A Right-of-Way permit is required prior to construction of the following improvements: DENIAL Please, sOn a tt ached report of deficiencies marked wi ke necessary corrections to plans or specifi for compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. iA I AA !4!' By: Date: oc/, • FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY ENGINEERING AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE BUILDING PERMI11i By Date: 9I i o ATTACHMENTS Dedication Application/Checklist U Encina Wastewater Screening Survey LI Encroachment Application/Checklist U Grading Permit Application U Grading Plan Application/Checklist LI Improvement Application/Checklist U Neighborhood Improvement Agreement, U Right-of-Way Permit Submittal Checklist and Information Sheet U Storm Water Compliance Forms U Other Name: Linda Ontiveros City of Carlsbad Address: 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008 Phone: (760) 602-2773 Fax: (760) 602-1052 Email: lonti@ci.carlsbad.ca.us CFD INFORMATION Reference No(s): fiY)_3 0300 Lot No.: Recordation: Subdivision/ Carlsbad Tract:-P-~2-(0) 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314. (60) 602-2720• FAX (760) 602-8562 7L1 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST SITE PLAN 3RD QItit1 El 1. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: j14OV ore9t i ?to e A. rh Arrow *.Existing ht-of-Way Width & Adjacent streetsr ting & Proposed Structures eway widths ting Street Improvements sting or proposed sewer lateral Property Lines sting or proposed water service E. Easements or proposed irrigation service 2. Show on site plan: rainage Patterns Building pad surface drainage must maintain a minimum slope of one percent towards an adjoining street or an approved drainage course. 2. ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE: "Finish grade will provide a minimum positive drainage of 2% to swale 5' away from building." Existing & Proposed Slopes and Topography Size, type, location, alignment of existing or proposed sewer and water service (s) that serves the project. Each unit requires a separate service, however, second dwelling units and apartment complexes are an exception. Sewer and water laterals should not be located within proposed driveways, per standards. 3. Include on title sheet: Site address Assessor's Parcel Number LegalDescription For commercial/industrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, include: total building square footage with the square footage for each different use, existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing, warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved. EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 2 Rev. 2102109 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1ST 2ND 3R0 DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE E*1\. LI LI 4a. Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of approval for I Project No.___________________________________________________________ LI LI LI 4b. All conditions are in compliance. Date: ) DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS LI LI 5. Dedication for all street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the building site and any storm drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and (9 for remodels with a value at or exceeding $ 17.000 pursuant to Carlsbad \1" LO Code Section 18.40.030(e) Dedication required as follows: F( P Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8 W x 11" plat map and submit with a title report. All easement documents must be approved and signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. Alached please find an ppcàtion form and submittal checklist for the dedication process. Submit the compietea application form with the required checklist items ãñd fees to the Engineering Department in person. Applications will not be accept by mail or fax. Dedication completed by: Date: tIp,. IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS i LI LI 6a. All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the construction exceeds $_82,000 pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.040. Public improvements required as follows: Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public improvement requirements. A registered Civil Engineer must prepare the appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements on the attached checklist to the Engineering Department through a separate plan check process. The completed application form and the requirements on the checklist must be submitted in person. Applications by mail or fax are not accepted. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of building permit. Improvement Plans signed by: Date: 3 Rev. 2/02/09 .4 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1ST Z" /D IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS continued LI 6b. Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title report or current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $441 so we may prepare the necessary Neighborhood Improvement Agreement. This agreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building permit. Future public improvements required as follows: C.kfZj'( 1VYL& ALA4=j V 10M &17-W D Cv LASILfl, LI LI LI 6c. Enclosed please find your Neighborhood Improvement Agreement (NIA). Please return agreement signed and notarized to the Engineering Department. Completed by: Date: LI El LI 6d. No Public Improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or defective improvements found adiacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction of the City Inspector prior to occupancy. GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS / The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section / 15.16.010 of the Municipal Code. 0 LI 7a. Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading requirements. Include accurate grading quantities in cubic yards (cut, fill import, export). This information must be included on the plans. LI LI LI 7b. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer must be submitted together with the completed application form attached. NOTE: The Grading Permit must be issued and rough grading approval obtained prior to issuance of a Building Permit Grading Inspector sign off by: Date: LI 0 LI 7c. Graded Pad Certification required. (Note: Pad certification may be required even if a grading permit is not required.) LI LI LI 7d .No Grading Permit required. LI LI LI 7e. If grading is not required, write "No Grading" on plot plan. 4 Rev. A BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1ST/"ND 3RD D'D MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT A Right-of-Way permit is required to do work in City Right-of-Way and/or private work adjacent to the public Right-of-Way. Types of work include, but are not limited to: street improvements, tree trimming, driveway construction, tying into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities. To see requirements, visit our website: www.carlsbadca.gov/engineering Right-of-Way permit required for: WQY?I. Oi) ,k1f1D 1fJA) INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT. If your facility is located in the City of Carlsbad sewer service area, you need to contact the Carlsbad of Carlsbad, Development Services Division, located at 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008. City Staff can provide forms and assistance. You may telephone (760) 602-2750 for assistance NPDES PERMIT 10. Complies with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant shall provide best management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level 'prior to discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever occurs first. STORM WATER COMPLIANCE 5 10a. Requires Project Storm Water Permit: PSP Oi 2-2-- j Tier I/Tier II (Requires SWPPP) - Please complete attached forms IJ pt - Please complete attached Storm Water Exemption form C21 El El DEVELOPMENT FEES 11. , Required fees are attached 9 More information needed No fees required rLA PL-M: A Rev. 2/02109 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1ST RD WATER METER REVIEW Domestic (potable) Use Ensure that the meter proposed by the owner/developer is not oversized. Oversized meters are inaccurate during !ow-flow conditions. If it is oversized, for the life of the meter, the City will not accurately bill the owner for the water used. All single family dwelling units receive "standard" I" service with 5/8" meter. All residential units that need to be fire sprinkled receive a 1" meter. See Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 17.04.230 for Automatic fire extinguishing systems criteria. If owner/developer proposes a size other than the "standard", then owner/developer must provide potable water demand calculations, which include total fixture counts and maximum water demand in gallons per minute (gpm). Once the gpm is provided, check against the "meter sizing schedule" to verify the anticipated meter size for the unit. Maximum service and meter size is a 2" service with a 2" meter. If a developer is proposing a meter greater than 2", suggest the installation of multiple 2" services as needed to provide the anticipated demand. (manifolds are considered on case by case basis to limit multiple trenching into the street). NOTE: Upon declaration of Drought Response Level 3 condition, no new potable water service shall be provided and no new temporary meters or permanent meters shall be provided. See Ordinance 44 for more information. 12a tii - L7(2- Cp-L-L-- (Ot1L OI'J D 12b. Irrigation Use (where recycled water is not available) All irrigation meters must be sized via irrigation calculations (in gpm) prior to approval. The developer must provide these calculations. Please follow these guidelines: If the project is a newer development (newer than 1998), check the recent improvement plans and observe if the new irrigation service is reflected on the improvement sheets. If so, at the water meter station, the demand in gpm may be listed there. Irrigation services are listed with a circled "I", and potable water is typically a circled "W". The irrigation service should look like: Q STA 1+00 Install 2" service and 1.5: meter (estimated 100 gpm) If the improvement plans do not list the irrigation meter and the service/meter will be installed via another instrument such as the building plans or grading plans (w/ a right of way permit of course), then the applicant must provide irrigation calculations for estimated worst-case irrigation demand (largest zone with the farthest reach). Typically, the landscape consultant has already reviewed this if landscape plans have been prepared, but the applicant must provide the calculations to you for your use. 6 Rev. 2102109 1ST 2ND 3R0 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST WATER METER REVIEW continued 12b. Irrigation Use (continued) Once you have received a good example of irrigation calculations, keep a set for your reference. In general the calculations will include: Hydraulic grade line Elevation at point of connection (POC) Pressure at POC in pounds per square inch (PSI) Worse case zone (largest, farthest away from valve Total Sprinkler heads listed (with gpm use per head) Include a 10% residual pressure at point of connection In general, all major sloped areas of a subdivision/project are to be irrigated via separate irrigation meters (unless the project is only SFD with no HOA). As long as the project is located within the City recycled water service boundary, the City is in the process of switching these irrigation services/meters to a new recycled water line 12c. Irrigation Use (where recycled water is available) Recycled water meters are sized the same as the irrigation meter above. If a project fronts a street with recycled water, then they should be connecting to this line to irrigate slopes within the development. For subdivisions, this should have been identified, and implemented on the improvement plans. Installing recycled water meters is a benefit for the applicant since they are exempt from paying the San DiegO County Water Capacity fees. However, if they front a street which the recycled water is there, but is not live (sometimes they are charged with potable water until recycled water is available), then the applicant must pay the San Diego Water Capacity Charge. If within three years, the recycled water line is charged with recycled water by CMWD, then the applicant can apply for a refund to the San Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA) for a refund. However, the City of Carlsbad cannot guarantee the refund. The applicant must deal with the SDCWA for this. 0 0 0 13. Additional Comments: 7 Rev. 2/02109 CITY OF CARLSBAD STANDARD FORM -TIER 1 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN 4, STORM WATER COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE / My project is not in a category of permit types exempt from the Construction SWPPP requirements I My project is not located Inside or within 200 feel of an environmentally sensitive area with a significant potential for contributing pollutants to nearby receiving waters by way of storm water runoff or non-storm water discharge(s). / My project does not requires a grading plan pursuant to the Carlsbad Grading Ordinance (Chapter 15.16 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code) I My project will not result in 2.500 square feet or more of soils disturbance including any associated construction staging, stockpiling, pavement removal, equipment storage, refueling and maintenance areas that meets one or more of the additional following criteria: located withIn 200 feet of an environmentally sensitive area or the Pacific Ocean; and/or, disturbed area is located on a slope with a grade at or exceeding 5 horizontal to 1 vertical; and/or disturbed area is located along or within 30 feet of a storm drain inlet, an open drainage channel or watercourse; and/or construction will be initialed during the rainy season or will extend into the rainy season (Oct. 1 through April 30). I CERTIFY TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE CHECKED STATEMENTS ARE TRUE AND CORRECT. I AM SUBMITTING FOR CITY APPROVAL A TIER 1 CONSTRUCTION SWPPP PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF CITY STANDARDS. I UNDERSTAND AND ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I MUST: (1) IMPLEMENT BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPS) DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICABLE TO MINIMIZE THE MOBILIZATION OF POLLUTANTS SUCH AS SEDIMENT AND TO MINIMIZE THE EXPOSURE OF STORM WATER TO CONSTRUCTION RELATED POLLUTANTS; AND, (2) ADHERE TO, AND AT ALL TIMES, COMPLY WITH THIS CITY APPROVED TIER 1 CONSTRUCTION SWPPP THROUGHTOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES UNTIL THE CONSTRUCTION WORK IS COMPLETE AND APPROVED BY THE Cl C SB p Ow OWNttrt'SAO NAMsi' tNrt I5tStS)/0WNLR oeNTNAMstsrowA - DATE I. ALL NECESSARY EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS SHALL BE AVAILABLE ON SITE TO FACILITATE RAPID INSTALLATION OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS WHEN RAIN IS EMINENT. THE OWNER/CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES TO WORKING ORDER TO THE SATISFACTION OF TIlE CITY ENGINEER AFTER EACH RUN- OFF PRODUCING RAINFALL. DIE OWNER/CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALl, ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE CITY ENGINEERING OR BUILDING INSPECTOR DUE TO UNCOMPLETED GRADING OPERATIONS OR UNFORESEEN CIRCUMSTANCES WHICH MAY ARISE. ALL REMOVABLE PROTECTIVE DEVICES SHALL BE IN PLACE A'I' TIlE END OF EACH WORKING DAY WHEN THE FIVE (5) DAY RAIN PROBABILITY FORECAST EXCEEDS FORTY PERCENT (40%). SILl' AND OTHER DEBRIS SHALL BE REMOVED AFTER EACH RAINFALL. S. ALL GRAVEL BAGS SHALL BE BURLAP TYPE WITH 3/4 INCH MINIMUM AGGREGATE. 6. ADEQUATE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL AND PERIMETER PROTECTION BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE MEASURES MUST BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED. SPECIAL NOTES rtlOJECT INFORMATION Site ArIdrcss:Z.42- Assessors Parcel Nunrber: Project tt)'_ (:orrsrirctiroi I'crurit No,: Estiurrrrtmt Crustriretirar Start t)atc Project f)rirslinrr Gp' ,,,,lviorrIlis Emergency Contact: Nsnsc:"- .1.777 24 lrorrr t'hnc:(l Pcrccivetl.1hrcat to Sronrr Water Qrrrrlity Medium Low tfiircdiimni box is checked, must attach a site triar street showing proposed work area and location of proposed structural OMPs For City Use Only Waste Management and Materials Erosio BMPS n Control Sediment Control BMPs Tracking Non-Storm at Pollution Control BMPs Control BMPs Management - Rest Management Practice . g Go E o a 0 g g E a a, (BMP) Description 4 .5 5m g' a S äcC c Of U)E O- 0i5 c . (S ma (nó C 0 iZ (S &n. &i o QC) o i3 sss CASQA Designation 4 C7 '? ° (3 ¶ C? '9 '9 0 '7 '7 IT '9 ly ') 't C? '9 '? W 00 w w • 0 W W (n0)0)0) W W W (I) W (1) W U) • W Of I- cc I- (f) Z U) Z to Z U) 5 Construction Activity Z Grading/Soil Disturbance ) Trenching/Excavation 'Stockplllng Drilling/Boring Concrets/Asphrrlt Sawcutllng 5 Concrstsflalwoik - -- -- ------ -. -- - Paving - Conduit/PipeInstallalton Slucco/ModarWork iWasleDisposet Sleglngllay Down Noa -- - - -- - - - __._.._._.._..__._ - - - ' - - - - - Equipment Maintenance and Fueling - - Hazardous Substance Use/Storage - - Oawoterlirg - Site Access Across Dirt OIlier (list): Instructions: Begin by reviewing the list of construction activities and checking the box to the left of any activity that will occur during the proposed construction. Add any 0111cr activity descriptions in the blank activity description boxes provided for that purpose and place a check in the box immediately to the left of the added activity description. For each activity desCiTibed, pick one or more best management practices (BMPs) from the list located aba the top of the form. Then place an X in the box at the place where the activity row intersects with the DM1' column. Do this for each activity that was checked off arid for each of tire selected BMPs selected from the list. For Example lithe project includes site access across dirt, then check the box to the left of "Site Access Across Dirt". Then review the list for something that applies such as 'Stabilized Coristrucion Ingress/Egress" under Tracking Control. Follow along the "Site Access Across Dirt" row until you get to the "Stabi lizeml Construction Ingress/Egress" column and place an X in the box where the two meet. As another example nay the project included a stockpile that you intend to cover with a plastic sheet. Since plastic sheeting is not on the list of BMPs, then write in "Cover with Plastic" in the blank column tinder the heading Erosion Control BMPs. Titeti place an X in the box where 'Stockpiling" row intersects the new "Cover with Plastic" column. To learn more about what each BMP description means, you may wish to review the DM1' Reference Handout prepared to assist applicants in the selection of appropriate Best Management Practice measures. The reference also explains the California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA) designation and how to apply tIre various selected BMPs to a project. [iae2 of2._ PLANNING DEPARTMENT BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST Plan Check No. CB 09-1204 Address 2420 Pio Pico Dr Planner Chris Sexton Phone (760) 602- 4624 APN: 156-110-01 Type of Project & Use: addition Net Project Density:1.0DU/AC Zoning: R-1 General Plan: jJFacilities Management Zone: j. CFD (in/out) #_Date of participation:_____ Remaining net dev acres:_____ Circle One - (For non-residential development: Type of land used created by this permit: Legend: Z Item Complete LI Item Incomplete - Needs your.action Environmental Review Required: YES LI NO [I] TYPE DATE OF COMPLETION: Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: Discretionary Action Required: YES fl NO Z TYPE APPROVAL/RESO. NO. DATE PROJECT NO. OTHER RELATED CASES: Compliance-with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance Project site located in Coastal Zone? YES Q NO CA Coastal Commission Authority? YES Q NO LI If California Coastal Commission Authority: •Contact them at - 7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite 103, San Diego, CA 92106-4402; (619) 767-2370 Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt): LI LI Habitat Management Plan Data Entry Completed? YES El NO LI If property has Habitat Type identified in Table 11 of HMP, complete HMP Permit application and assess fees in Permits Plus (A/P/Ds, Activity Maintenance, enter CB#, toolbar, Screens, HMP Fees, Enter Acres of Habitat Type impacted/taken, UPDATE!) LI Inclusionary Housing Fee required: YES LI NO - (Effective date of Inclusionary Housing Ordinance - May 21, 1993.) Data Entry Completed? YES LI NO LI (A/P/Ds, Activity Maintenance, enter CB#, toolbar, Screens, Housing Fees, Construct Housing Y/N, Enter Fee, UPDATE!) - H:\ADMlN\TemplateBuilding Plancheck Review Checklist.doc Rev 4/08 OWN Zoning:- 1 . Setbacks: Front: Interior Side: Street Side: Rear: Top of slope: Required Shown Required 10. Shown 2L Required ICY Shown 42' Required 20' Shown Required Shown Site Plan: Provide a fully dimensional site plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way width, dimensional setbacks and existing topographical lines (including all side and rear yard slopes). Provide legal description of property and assessor's parcel number; Policy 44— Neighborhood Architectural Design Guidelines Applicability: YES LII NO Project complies: YES LI NOD OR ~Mm Sim Accessory structure setbacks: Front: Required Shown 20 Interior Side: Required 10' Shown 13 Street Side: Required 10L Shown Zi Rear: Required Shown 10' (nonconforming) Structure separation: Required iQ Shdwn Lot Coverage: Required <40% Shown 4. Height: Required ShownQ LII LII 5. Parking: Spaces Required 2 Shown, (breakdown by uses for commercial and industrial projects required) Residential Guest Spaces Required Shown LI LI LI Additional Comments OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER ATE / H:ADMIN\Template\BuiIding Plancheck Review Checklist.doc Rev 4/08 o 0 12coAf /i/10 ELEV. HALLWAY LAUNDRY tT1 H. VDER DM BATH BEDROOM C)L j .2~o . q- - 5 f 1 ? 4546- -f- r 7ç(17 t14-- e S/> 71AY' L 9/2 t;V4- &-r- 3 > 3(2) 4- \ Li sYAt C6 le .,? 0 110 *,A--:~- L-1 c,ef54ci (2D1 L. F— ?K I LIA 7 c t ç V~ll (.a( c) -.,, C. I = (,3 -1 2-4 * €i2- V21 L -T ?' 22) 4 4 c 42cc 1) 2O2J 'a 4- LI 4'(2: et CO1 h ____ T?0zz4. N- 2-c4 •> Z. 2 ct a. S - < 2S 4 ;j4 t4-S.: 1(OL.1 (1L) \2il (t21 tc,2-4- c44(.1)' i4-,çct (' a 4.4 /s - r _ iJ3 Z2t2 ç1- 711 P Cc z 4-t ' r?_ 5I2 zsl V3iO 12 Cg, 1'2 c 0 >a,7c'4 5Ced jc\a 1f3ø 4Oc5 EAST COUNTY SOIL CONSULTATION AND ENGINEERING, INC. 10925 HARTLEY ROAD, SUITE "I" SANTEE, CALIFORNIA 92071 (619) 258-7901 Fax 258-7902 Mr. Steven M. Heitchew July 15, 2009 2420 Pio Pico Drive Project No. 09-1106E4 Carlsbad, California 92008 Subject: Limited Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Second Story and Two-Story Additions 2420 Pio Pico Drive City of Carlsbad, California Dear Mr. Heitchew: In accordance with your request, we have performed a limited geotechnical investigation of the soil conditions at the subject site to provide the soil engineering criteria for site grading and recommen an appropriate foundation system for the proposed residential additions. Our investigation has found that the area of the proposed improvement is underlain by undocumented fill and topsoil to a maximum depth of approximately 2 feet below existing grae. Dense sandstone of the Terrace Deposits Formation was underlying the topsoil to the explored depth of 4 feet. It is our opinion that the construction of the proposed additions is geotechnicall feasible provided the recommendations herein are implemented in the design and construction. Should you have any questions regarding the contents of this report, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Respectfully submitted, 10 ou 1coi No. GE 2704 m Lo Exp: çgr'c%fl Mamadou Saliou Diallo, P.E. RCE 54071, GE 2704 MSD/md ciecl?/2ar STEVEN M HEITCHEW PROJECT NO. 09-1106E4 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................................................3 SCOPEOF SERVICES ....................... . ................................................................................................................ 3 SITE DESCRIPTION AND PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ........................................................................3 FIELD INVESTIGATION AND LABORATORY TESTING........................................................................4 GEOLOGY.........................................................................................................................................................4 GeologicSetting....................................................................................................................................4 SiteStratigraphy....................................................................................................................................4 SEISMICITY......................................................................................................................................................5 RegionalSeismicity...............................................................................................................................5 SeismicAnalysis ...................................................................................................................................5 2007 CBC Seismic Design Criteria......................................................................................................6 Geologic Hazard Assessment................................................................................................................6 GEOTECHNICALEVALUATION..................................................................................................................7 CompressibleSoils ..................................................................................................................................7 ExpansiveSoils ........................................................................................... . .......................................... 7 Groundwater..........................................................................................................................................7 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS............................................................................................7 GRADINGAND EARTHWORK......................................................................................................................8 Clearingand Grubbing..........................................................................................................................8 ErosionControl ................................................................................... . ................................................... 8 Standard Grading Guidelines .................... . ............................................................................................ 8 FOUNDATIONSAND SLABS ........................................................................................................................8 SETTLEMENT.................................................................................................................................................... 9 PRESATURATION OF SLAB SUBGRADE...................................................................................................9 TEMPORARYSLOPES ....................................................................................................................................9 TRENCHBACKFILL ...................................................................................................................................... 10 DRAINAGE......................................................................................................................................................10 FOUNDATIONPLAN REVIEW....................................................................................................................10 LIMITATIONS OF INVESTIGATION .........................................................................................................10 ADDITIONALSERVICES ............................................................................................................................11 PLATES Plate 1- Location of Exploratory Boreholes Plate 2 - Summary Sheet (Exploration Borehole Logs) Plate 3 - USCS Soil Classification Chart PAGEL- 1, LABORATORY TEST RESULTS..............................................................................................13 REFERENCES............................................................................................................... ..................................... 14 2 STEVEN M HEITCHEW PROJECT NO. 09-1106E4 INTRODUCTION This is to present the findings and conclusions of a limited geotechnical investigation for proposed second story and two-story additions to the existing one and two-story residence located at 2420 Pio Pico Drive, in the City of Carlsbad, California. The objectives of the investigation were to evaluate the existing soils conditions and provide recommendations for the proposed construction. SCOPE OF SERVICES The following services were provided during this investigation: Site reconnaissance and review of published geologic, seismological and geotechnical reports and maps pertinent to the project area Subsurface exploration consisting of three (3) boreholes within the limits of the proposed area of improvement. The boreholes were logged by our Staff Geologist. Collection of representative soil samples at selected depths. The obtained samples were sealed in moisture-resistant containers and transported to the laboratory for subsequent analysis. Laboratory testing of samples representative of the types of soils encountered during the field investigation Geologic and engineering analysis of the field and laboratory data; which provided the basis for our conclusions and recommendations Production of this report, which summarizes the results of the above analysis and presents our findings and recommendations for site improvement SITE DESCRIPTION AND PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION The subject site is a residential lot located at the southeast corner of Pio Pico Drive and Forest Avenue, in the City of Carlsbad, California. A one and two-story house occupies the property which encompasses an area of approximately 25,000 square feet. The site is relatively level with general drainage to the west. Vegetation consisted of grass, shrubs and a few trees. The parcel is bordered by Pio Pico Drive to the west, Forest Avenue to the north and similar residential developments to the remaining directions. The Site Plan prepared by James Chinn of Del Mar, California indicates that the proposed construction will conclude a second story and two-story additions to the north side of the existing house. The additions will be wood-framed and founded on continuous footings with a slab-on- grade floor. 3 STEVEN M HEITCHEW PROJECT NO. 09-1106E4 FIELD INVESTIGATION AND LABORATORY TESTING On July 2, 2009, three (3) boreholes were drilled to a maximum depth of approximately 4.0 feet below existing grade with a hand auger. The approximate locations of the boreholes are shown on the attached Plate No. 1, entitled "Location of Exploratory Boreholes". A continuous log of the soils encountered was recorded at the time of drilling and is shown on Plate No. 2 entitled "Summary Sheet". The soils were visually and texturally classified according to the filed identification procedures set forth on the attached Plate No. 3 entitled "USCS Soil Classification". Following the field exploration, laboratory testing was performed to evaluate the pertinent engineering properties of the foundation materials. The laboratory-testing program included moisture and density, particle size analysis and expansion index tests. These tests were performed in general accordance with ASTM standards and other accepted test methods. Page L-1 and Plate No. 2 provide a summary of the laboratory test results. GEOLOGY Geologic Setting The subject site is located within the southern portion of what is known as the Peninsular Ranges Geomorphic Province of California. The geologic map pertaining to the area indicates that the site is underlain by Pleistocene marine terrace deposits (Qt). Site Stratigraphv The subsurface descriptions provided are interpreted from conditions exposed during the field investigation and/or inferred from the geologic literature. As such, all of the subsurface conditions may or may not be represented. Detailed descriptions of the subsurface materials encountered during the field investigation are presented on the exploration logs provided on Plate No. 2. The following paragraphs provide general descriptions of the encountered soil types. Undocumented Fill (Quf) Undocumented fill soils were encountered in Borehole No. 1 to a depth of approximately 6 inches below existing grade and consisted of reddish brown, silty sand that was dry and loose in consistency. Topsoil Topsoil is the surficial soil material that mantles the ground, usually containing roots and other organic materials, which supports vegetation. Topsoil observed in the boreholes was approximately 6 to 18 inches thick and consisted of dark brown, silty sand that was moist, loose and porous in consistency with minor amounts of organics (roots and rootlets). 4 STEVEN M HEITCHEW PROJECT NO. 09-1106E4 Marine Terrace Deposits (Ot) Terrace deposits were observed below the topsoil layer. They generally consisted of reddish brown, silty sand that was dry and dense in consistency. SEISMICITY Regional Seismicity Generally, Seismicity within California can be attributed to the regional tectonic movement taking place along the San Andreas Fault Zone, which includes the San Andreas Fault and most parallel and subparallel faults within the state. The portion of southern California where the subject site is located is considered seismically active. Seismic hazards are attributed to groundshaking from earthquake events along nearby or more distant Quaternary faults. The primary factors in evaluating the effect an earthquake has on a site are the magnitude of the event, the distance from the epicenter to the site and the near surface soil profile. According to the Fault-Rupture Hazard Zones Act of 1994 (revised Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zones Act), quaternary faults have been classified as "active" faults, which show apparent surface rupture during the last 11,000 years (i.e., Holocene time). "Potentially-active" faults are those faults with evidence of displacing Quaternary sediments between 11,000 to 16,000 years old. Seismic Analysis Base on our evaluation, the closest known "active" fault is the Newport-Inglewood Fault Zone located approximately 5.0 miles (8.0 kilometers) to the west. The Newport-Inglewood fault is the design fault of the project due to the predicted credible fault magnitude and ground acceleration. The Seismicity of the site was evaluated utilizing deterministic methods (Eqseach ver 3.0, Blake, 2000) for active Quaternary faults within the regional vicinity. The site is subject to a Maximum Probable Earthquake of 6.9 Magnitude along the Newport-Inglewood fault, with a corresponding Peak Ground Acceleration of 0.45g. The maximum Probable Earthquake is defined as the maximum earthquake that is considered likely to occur within a 100-year time period. The effective ground acceleration at the site is associated with the part of significant ground motion, which contains repetitive strong-energy shaking, and which may produce structural deformation. As such, the effective or "free field" ground acceleration is referred to as the Repeatable High Ground Acceleration (RHGA). It has been determined by Ploessel and Slosson (1974) that the RHGA is approximately equal to 65 percent of the Peak Ground Acceleration for earthquakes occurring within 20 miles of a site. Based on the above, the calculated Credible RHGA at the site is 0.29g. STEVEN M HEITCHEW PROJECT NO. 09-1106E4 2007 CBC Seismic Design Criteria A review of the active fault maps pertaining to the site indicates the existence of the Newport- Inglewood Fault Zone approximately 8 km to the west. Ground shaking from this fault or one of the major active faults in the region is the most likely happening to affect the site. With respect to this hazard, the site is comparable to others in the general area. The proposed additions should be designed in accordance with seismic design requirements of the 2007 California Building Code or the Structural Engineers Association of California using the following seismic design parameters: PARAMETER . VALUE 2007 CBC REFERENCE Site Class D Table 1613.5.2 Mapped Spectral Acceleration For Short Periods, S 1.25 Figure 1613.5(3) Mapped Spectral Acceleration For a 1-Second Period, S1 0.50 Figure 1613.5(4) Site Coefficient, Fa 1.0 Table 1613.5.3(1) Site Coefficient, Fv 1.5 Table 1613.5.3(2) Geologic Hazard Assessment Ground Rupture Ground rupture due to active faulting is not considered likely .due to the absence of known fault traces within the vicinity of the project, however, this possibility cannot be completely ruled out. The unlikely hazard of ground rupture should not preclude consideration of "flexible" design for on-site utility lines and connections. Liquefaction Liquefaction involves the substantial loss of shear strength in saturated soils, usually sandy soils with a loose consistency when subjected to earthquake shaking. Based on the absence of shallow groundwater and consistency of the underlying terrace deposits, it is our opinion that the potential for liquefaction is very low. Landsliding There is no indication that landslides or unstable slope conditions exist on or adjacent to the project site. There are no obvious geologic hazards related to landsliding to the proposed development or adjacent properties. Tsunamis and Seiches Since the subject property is approximately 100 feet above mean sea level, it is unlikely that an earthquake-generated tsunami would, affect the site. According to the CSG' website, the largest recorded tsunami to hit the San Diego area was 3.6 meters (approximately 10 feet) in the year 1856, from a seismic event in Japan. The site is also not subject to seiches (waves in confined bodies of water). . . N. STEVEN M HEITCHEW PROJECT NO. 09-1106E4 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION Based on our field investigation and evaluation of the collected information, we conclude that the proposed residential additions are feasible from a geotechnical standpoint provided the recommendations herein will be properly implemented during construction. In order to provide a uniform support for the proposed additions, new footings should be extended to the dense terrace deposits. The new foundation may consist of reinforced continuous footings with conventional reinforced slabs. Recommendations and criteria for foundation design are provided in the Foundation and Slab recommendations section of this report. Compressible Soils Our field observations and testing indicate low compressibility within the terrace deposits, which underly the area of the proposed additions. However, loose fill and/ or topsoil were typically encountered to depths ranging from approximately 6 inches to 2 feet below surface grades. These soils are compressible. Due to the potential for soil compression upon loading, remedial grading of these loose soils, including overexcavation and recompaction will be required unless footings are extended to the dense terrace deposits. Following implementation of the earthwork recommendations presented herein, the potential for soil compression resulting from the new development has been estimated to be low. The low-settlement assessment assumes a well-planned and maintained site drainage system. Recommendations regarding mitigation by earthwork construction are presented in the Grading and Earthwork recommendations section of this report. Expansive Soils An expansion index test was performed on a representative sample of the terrace deposits to determine volumetric change characteristics with change in moisture content. An expansion index of 7 was obtained which indicates a very low expansion potential for the foundation soils. Groundwater Static groundwater was not encountered to the depths of the boreholes. The building pad is located at an elevation of approximately 100 feet above Mean Sea Level. Recommendations to prevent or mitigate the effects of poor surface drainage are presented in the Drainage section of this report. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The following conclusions and recommendations are based upon the analysis of the data and information obtained from our soil investigation. This includes site reconnaissance; field investigation; laboratory testing and our general knowledge of the soils native to the site. The site is suitable for the proposed residential additions provided the recommendations set forth are implemented during construction. 7 STE VENM HEITCHEW PROJECT NO. 09-1106E4 GRADING AND EARTHWORK The following grading and earthwork recommendations are based upon the limited geotechnical investigation performed, and should be verified during construction by our field representative. Clearing and Grubbing Site grading should consist primarily of clearing and grubbing, i.e. the removal of vegetation and deleterious materials. Vegetation and the debris from the clearing operation should be properly disposed of off-site. The area should be thoroughly inspected for any possible buried objects, which need to be rerouted or removed prior to the inception of, or during grading. All holes, trenches, or pockets left by the removal of these objects should be properly backfilled with compacted fill materials. Based on our field investigation, dense sandstone of the Terrace Deposits Formation is underlying the proposed area of improvement at shallow depths. It is our opinion that these soils will be adequate for the support of the proposed additions. However, we recommend that the upper foot of surface soils be scarified, moisture conditioned within 2 percent above optimum and recompacted to a minimum of 90 percent relative compaction for slab support. Foundation excavations should be observed by a representative of this firm to verify competent bearing soils. Erosion Control Due to the granular characteristics of the subgrade soils, areas of recent grading or exposed ground may be subject to erosion. During construction, surface water should be controlled via berms, sand/ gravel bags, silt fences, straw wattles, siltation basins, positive surface grades or other method to avoid damage to the finish work or adjoining properties. All site entrances and exits must have coarse gravel or steel shaker plates to minimize offsite sediment tracking. Best Management Practices (BMPs) must be used to protect storm drains and minimize pollution. The contractor should take measures to prevent erosion of graded areas until such time as permanent drainage and erosion control measures have been installed. After completion of grading, all excavated surfaces should exhibit positive drainage and eliminate areas where water might pond. Standard Grading Guidelines Grading and earthwork should be conducted in accordance with the standard-of-practice methods for this local, the guidelines of the current edition of the Uniform Building Code, and the requirements of the jurisdictional agency. Where the information provided in the geotechnical report differs from the Standard Grading Guidelines, the requirements outlined in the report shall govern. FOUNDATIONS AND SLABS a. Continuous and spread footings are suitable for use and should extend to a minimum depth of 18 inches below the lowest adjacent grade for the two-story and second story additions into the dense sandstone of the Terrace Deposits Formation. Continuous footings should be at least 15 inches in width and reinforced with four #4 steel bars; two bars placed near the top of the footings and the other two bars placed near the bottom of the footings. New footings should be dowelled to existing footings in accordance with the structural engineer requirements. STEVEN M HEITCHEW PROJECT NO. 09-1106E4 Interior concrete floor slabs should be a minimum 4-inch thick. Reinforcement should consist of #3 bars placed at 16 inches on center each way within the middle third of the slabs by supporting the steel on chairs or concrete blocks "dobies". The slabs should be underlain by 2 inches of clean sand over a 10-mil visqueen moisture barrier. The effect of concrete shrinkage will result in cracks in virtually all concrete slabs. To reduce the extent of shrinkage, the concrete should be placed at a maximum of 4-inch slump. The minimum steel recommended is not intended to prevent shrinkage cracks. Where moisture sensitive floor coverings are anticipated over the slabs, the 10-mil plastic moisture barrier should be underlain by a capillary break at least 2-inch thick, consisting of coarse sand, gravel or crushed rock not exceeding 3/4 inch in size with no more than 5 percent passing the #200 sieve. An allowable soil bearing value of 2,000 pounds per square foot may be used for the design of continuous and spread footings at least 12 inches wide and founded a minimum of 12 inches into the dense sandstone of the Terrace Deposits Formation as set forth in the 2007 California Building Code, Table 1804.2. This value may be increased by 400 psf for each additional foot of depth or width to a maximum value of 4,000 lb/fi2. Lateral resistance to horizontal movement may be provided by the soil passive pressure and friction of concrete to soil. An allowable passive pressure of 250 pounds per square foot per foot of depth may be used. A coefficient of friction of 0.35 is recommended. The soils passive pressure as well as the bearing value may be increased by 1/3 for wind and seismic loading. SETTLEMENT Settlement of compacted fill is normal and should be anticipated. Since the proposed footings are anticipated to be supported by the dense sandstone of the Terrace Deposits Formation, the total and differential settlement should be within tolerable limits. PRESATURATION OF SLAB SUBGRADE Because of the granular characteristics of the existing soils, presoaking of the subgrade prior to concrete pour is not required. However, subgrade soils in areas receiving concrete should be watered prior to concrete placement to mitigate any drying shrinkage, which may occur following site grading. TEMPORARY SLOPES Excavations for foundations or on-site utility trenches may be made vertically for shallow depths and must be either shored or sloped at 1H: lv for depths greater than 4 feet; OSHA guidelines for trench excavation safety should be observed during construction. 9 STE VENM HEITCHEW PROJECT NO. 09-1106E4 TRENCH BACKFILL Excavations for utility lines, which extend under structural areas should be properly backfilled and compacted. Utilities should be bedded and backfilled with clean sand or approved granular soil to a depth of at least one foot over the pipe. This backfill should be uniformly watered and compacted to a firm condition for pipe support. The remainder of the backfill should be on-site soils or non- expansive imported soils, which should be placed in thin lifts, moisture-conditioned and compacted to at least 90% relative compaction. DRAINAGE Adequate measures should be undertaken to properly finish grade the site after the additions and other improvements are in place, such that the drainage water within the site and adjacent properties is directed away from the foundations, footings, floor slabs and the tops of slopes via rain gutters, downspouts, surface swales and subsurface drains towards the natural drainage for this area. A minimum gradient of 1 percent is recommended in hardscape areas. For earth areas, a minimum gradient of 5 percent away from the structure for a distance of at least 5 feet should be provided. Earth swales should have a minimum gradient of 2 percent. Drainage should be directed to approved drainage facilities. Proper surface and subsurface drainage will be required to minimize the potential of water seeking the level of the bearing soils under the foundations, footings and floor slabs, which may otherwise result in undermining and differential settlement of the structure and other improvements. FOUNDATION PLAN REVIEW Foundation plans should be reviewed by our firm during the design phase to assure conformance with the intent of this report. During construction foundation excavations should be observed by our representative prior to the placement of forms, reinforcement or concrete for conformance with the plans and specifications. LIMITATIONS OF INVESTIGATION Our investigation was performed using the skill and degree of care ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable soils engineers and geologists practicing in this or similar localities. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the conclusions and professional advice included in this report. This report is prepared for the sole use of our client and may not be assigned to others without the written consent of the client and ECSC&E, Inc. The samples collected and used for testing, and the observations made, are believed representative of site conditions; however, soil and geologic conditions can vary significantly between exploration borings, test pits and surface exposures. As in most major projects, conditions revealed by construction excavations may vary with preliminary findings. If this occurs, the changed conditions must be evaluated by a representative of ECSC&E and designs adjusted as required or alternate designs recommended. 10 STEVEN M HEITCHEW PROJECT NO. 09-1106E4 This report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the owner, or of his representative to ensure that the information and recommendations contained herein are brought to the attention of the project architect and engineer. Appropriate recommendations should be incorporated into the structural plans. The necessary steps, should be taken to see that the contractor and subcontractors carry out such recommendations in the field. The findings of this report are valid as of this present date. However, changes in the conditions of a property can occur with the passage of time, whether they are due to natural processes or the works of man on this or adjacent properties. In addition, changes in applicable or appropriate standards may occur from legislation or the broadening of knowledge. Accordingly, the findings of this report may be invalidated wholly or partially by changes outside of our control. Therefore, this report is subject to review and should be updated after a period of two years. ADDITIONAL SERVICES The review of plans and specifications, field observations and testing under our direction are integral parts of the recommendations made in this report. If East County Soil Consultation and Engineering, Inc. is not retained for these services, the client agrees to assume our responsibility for any potential claims that may arise during construction. Observations and testing are additional services, which are provided by our firm, and should be budgeted within the cost of development. Plates No. 1 through 3, Page L-1 and References are parts of this report. 11 /q V EAST COUNTY SOIL CONSULTATION & ENGINEERING, INC. 10925 HARTLEY RD.. SUITE I. SANTEE. CA 92071 (619) 258-7901 Fax (619) 258-7902 f774/ )e47l>' /?j99 //O6b4 PI4 Na./ SUMMARY SHEET NO. 1 BOREHOLE NO. 1 DEPTH SOIL DESCRIPTION Surface UNDOCUMENTED FILL (QuO reddish brown, dry, loose, silty sand 0.5' TOPSOIL dark brown, moist, loose, porous, silty fine sand with rootlets '' cc cc cc cc cc 1 .0 2.0' TERRACE DEPOSITS FORMATION (Qt) reddish brown, dry to moist, dense, silty fine sand 4.0' bottom of borehole, no caving, no groundwater borehole backfilled 7/2/09 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BOREHOLE NO.2 DEPTH SOIL DESCRIPTION Surface TOPSOIL dark brown, moist, loose, porous, silty fine sand with rootlets 1.0' TERRACE DEPOSITS FORMATION (Qt) reddish brown, dry, dense, silty fine sand 3.0' bottom of borehole, no caving, no groundwater borehole backfilled 7/2/09 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BOREHOLE NO.3 DEPTH SOIL DESCRIPTION Surface TOPSOIL dark brown, moist, loose, porous, silty fine sand with rootlets 0.5' TERRACE DEPOSITS FORMATION (Qt) reddish brown, dry, dense, silty sand with a trace of clay 1.5' reddish brown, dry, dense, silty fine sand 2.0' bottom of borehole, no caving, no groundwater borehole backfilled 7/2/09 I'd M 107.0 5.0 Y UV Y M 114.9 13.5 STEVEN M HEITcHEW PROJECT NO. 09-1106E4 PLATE NO.2 Y = DRY DENSITY IN PCF M = MOISTURE CONTENT IN % 12 CLASSIFICATION RANGE OF GRAIN SIZES U.S. STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN SIEVE SIZE MILLIMETERS BOULDERS Above 12 Inches Above 305 COBBLES 12 Inches To 3 Inches 305 To 76.2 GRAVEL 3 Inches to No. 4 76.2 to 4.76 Coarse 3 Inches to 3/4 Inch 76.2 to 19.1 Fine 3h Inch to No. 4 19.1 to 4.76 SAND No. 4 to No. 200 4.76 to 0.074 Coarse No. 4 to No. 10 4.76 to 2.00 Medium No. 10 to No. 40 2.00 to 0.420 Fine No. 40 to No. 200 0.420 to 0.074 SILT AND CLAY Below No. 200 Below 0.074 OW= N 9. J'uUau 40 30 00 /3 40 90 '00 UOUIO UOIF (U$. 10 '0 MAJOR DIVISIONS SYMBOL DESCRIPTION GW WELL GRADED GRAVELS OR GRAVEL- SAND MIXTURES, LITTLE OR NO FINES GRAVELS (MORE THAN /2 OF COARSE GP _________ POORLY GRADED GRAVELS OR GRAVEL-SAND MIXTURES, LITTLE OR NO FINES ____________________________________ GM SILTY GRAVELS, GRAVEL-SAND-SILT MIXTURES FRACTION >NO. 4 SIEVE COARSE GRAINED SOILS SIZE) GC CLAYEY GRAVELS, GRAVEL-SAND-CLAY MIXTURES (MORE THAN V. OF SOIL> NO. 200 SIEVE SIZE) sw WELL GRADED SANDS OR GRAVELLY SANDS, LITTLE OR NO FINES SANDS (MORE THAN V2 OF COARSE FRACTION <NO. 4 SIEVE SP POORLY GRADED SANDS OR GRAVELLY SANDS, LITTLE OR NO FINES SM SILTY SANDS, SILT-SAND MIXTURES SIZE) Sc CLAYEY SANDS, SAND-CLAY MIXTURES SILTS & ML INORGANIC SILTS AND VERY FINE SANDS, ROCK FLOUR, SILTY OR CLAYEY FINE SANDS OR CLAYEY SILTS WITH SLIGHT PLASTICITY FINE GRAINED SOILS (MORE THAN '/ OF SOIL < NO. 200 SIEVE SIZE) CLAYS LIQUID LIMIT <so CL INORGANIC CLAYS OF LOW TO MEDIUM PLASTICITY, GRAVELLY CLAYS, SANDY CLAYS, SILTY CLAYS, LEAN CLAYS OL ORGANIC SILTS AND ORGANIC SILTY CLAYS OF LOW PLASTICITY SILTS & MR INORGANIC SILTS, MICACEOUS OR DIATOMACEOUS FINE SANDY OR SILTY SOILS, ELASTIC SILTS CH INORGANIC CLAYS OF HIGH PLASTICITY, FAT CLAYS CLAYS LIQUID LIMIT >50 OH ORGANIC CLAYS OF MEDIUM TO HIGH PLASTICITY, ORGANIC SILTY CLAYS, ORGANIC SILTS HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS Pt PEAT AND OTHER HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS CLASSIFICATION CHART (UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM) GRAIN SIZE CHART EAST COUNTY SOIL CONSULTATION AND ENGINEERING, INC. 10925 HARTLEY ROAD, SUITE "I" SANTEE, CALIFORNIA 92071 U.S.C.S. SOIL CLASSIFICATION PLASTICITY CHART STEVEN M. HEITCHEW PROJECT PROJECT NO. 09-1106E4 PLATE NO. 3 JULY 15, 2009 STE VENM HEITCHEWPROJECTNO. 09-1106E4 L-1 ,.PAGE LABORATORY TEST RESULTS EXPANSION INDEX TEST (ASTM D4829) INITIAL SATURATED 0 INITIAL DRY MOISTURE MOISTURE DENSITY EXPANSION CONTENT(%) CONTENT(%) (PCF) INDEX LOCATION 10.8 25.0 103.1 7 BH-3@1.0' PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS (ASTM D422) U.S standard Siee Si 1-(2 Percent Pain". B!I- 1 di 1 Tops' Petent Psin BH- I t 5 Terrace'Deotts Forntatjpn Percent Pain BE-I-S 5 10' Teac.e, f)epit . Fuirnatto,n 112" • - 100 - 3/8" 100 • 98 - #4 99 93 - #8 ' 99 90 100 #16 98.. 89 99 #30 89 80 91 #50 51 51 66 0 #100 30 32 47 #200 23 - 26 41 USCS SM SM • SM/SC - 1• STEVEN M HEITCHEW PROJECT NO. 09-1106E4 REFERENCES "Limited Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Second Dwelling Unit, 2111 Grandview Street, City of Oceanside, California", Project No. 09-1 106D1, Prepared by East County Soil Consultation and Engineering, Inc., Dated June 25, 2009. "Limited Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Second Story Addition, 972 Laguna Drive, City of Carlsbad, California", Project No. 09-1106E4, Prepared by East County Soil Consultation and Engineering, Inc., Dated January 21, 2009. "2007 California Building Code, California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 2, Volume 2 of 2", Published by International Code Council. 4. "Limited Site Investigation, Proposed Two-Story Single-Family Residence, 426 S. Pacific Street, City of Oceanside, California.", Project No. 04-1106A1, Prepared by East County Soil Consultation and Engineering, Inc., Dated November 17, 2004. "Limited Site Investigation, Proposed Commercial Building Site, 2815 Jefferson Street, City of Carlsbad, California", Project No. 01-1106E5, Prepared by East County Soil Consultation and Engineering, Inc., Dated February 13, 2001. "Geotechnical and Foundation Engineering: Design and Construction", by Robert W. Day, 1999. "1997 Uniform Building Code, Volume 2, Structural Engineering Design Provisions", Published by International Conference of Building Officials. "Maps of Known Active Fault Near-Source Zones in California and Adjacent Portions of Nevada to be used with 1997 Uniform Building Code", Published by International Conference of Building Officials. "Geologic Maps of the Northwestern Part of San Diego County, California", Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology, by Siang S. Tan and Michael P. Kennedy, 1996. "Eqfaultl Eqsearch, Version 3.0", by Blake, T.F., 1995, Updated 2000. "Foundations and Earth Structures, Design Manual 7.2", by Department of Navy Naval Facilities Engineering Command, May 1982, Revalidated by Change 1 September 1986. 14 C.a r I s b a.d I CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE PAYMENT OF SCHOOL FEES OR OTHER MITIGATION This form must be completed by the City, the applicant, and the appropriate school districts and returned to the City prior to issuing .a building permit. The City will not issue any building permit without a completed school fee form. Project Name: HEITCHEW RESIDENCE Building Permit Plan Check Number: CB091204 Project Address: 2420 PlO PICO DR A.P.N.: 1561100100 Project Applicant (Owner Name): STEVE & KIM HEITCHEW Project Description: RESIDENTIAL ADDITION Building Type: 5113 Residential: New Dwelling Units Square Feet of Living Area in New Dwelling Second Dwelling Unit: Square Feet of Living Area in SDU Residential Additions: 3,267 Net Square Feet Nw Area Commercial/Industrial: Square Feet Floor Area City Certification of Applicant Information: Date: 08/14/2009 SCHOOL DISTRICTS WITHIN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD Carlsbad Unified School District Unified School District 215 Mata Way 6225 El Canino Real 1234 Arcadia Drive San Marcos, CA 92069 (290-2649) _arIsbad CA 92009 (331-5000) Vista CA 92083 (726-2170) Contact: Nancy Dolce (By Appt. Only) Encinitas Union School District San Dieguito Union High School District 101 South Rancho Santa Fe Rd 710 Encinitas Blvd. Encinitas, CA 92024 (944-4300 ext 166) Encinitas, CA 92024 (753-6491) Certification of Applicant/Owners. The person executing this declaration (Owner") certifies under penalty of perjury that (1) the information provided above is correct and true to the best of the Owner's knowledge, and that the Owner will file an amended certification of payment and pay the additional fee if Owner requests an increase in the number of dwelling units or square footage after the building permit is issued or if the initial determination of units or square footage is found to be incorrect, and that (2) the Owner is the owner/developer of the abov described project(s), or that the person executing this declaration is authorized to sign on behalf of the Owner. Signature: / Date: Revised 3/30/2006 SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL FEE CERTIFICATION (To be completed by the school district(s)) *************************************************************************************************** THIS FORM INDICATES THAT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROJECT HAVE BEEN OR WILL BE SATISFIED. SCHOOL DISTRICT: The undersigned, being duly authorized by the applicable School District, certifies that the developer, builder, or owner has satisfied the obligation for school facilities. This is to certify that the applicant listed on page 1 has paid all amounts or completed other applicable school mitigation determined by the School District. The City may issue building permits for this project. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICIAL 4a. TITLE NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT WALTER FREEMAN ASSISTANT SUPER-1-bam-ND—W CARLSBAD UNIFIED SCHOOL 4 6225 EL CAMINO RM DATE PHONE NUMBER Revised 3/30/2006 ON of Carlsbad Plan Check Revision Permit No: PCR10009 Job Address: 2420 PlO PICO DR Status: ISSUED Permit Type: PCR Applied: 02/02/2010 Parcel No: 1561100100 Lot U: 0 Approved: 06/29/2010 Reference No: CB091204 Issued: 06/29/2010 PC U: Inspect Area: Project Title: HEITCHEW: ADD COPULA OVER EXIST. HOUSE Applicant: Owner: DANIEL MONOTIJO HEITCHEW STEVEN M 1825 MCCAULEY LN 2420 PlO PICO DR CARLSBAD CARLSBAD CA 760-644-0714 00136104885 BLDG PLAN CHECK $250.001 / Fees: $250.00 1 Additional Fees: $0.00 Total Fees: $250.00 j Balance: $0.00 CITY OF CARLSD/-%D13 PLAN CHECK REVISION APPLICATION B-15 Development Services Building Department 1635 Faraday Avenue 760-602-2719 www.carlsbadca.gov Plan Check Revision No. '-' OOOI Original Plan Check No;_O3O (2Q1 / ProjectAddress 2PO 2 piCc' Date Contact fY[OO Ph 6c' Email P'ui"i 6i/P11 b411(ILIS (C ContactAddress h -1 P71 'L'-. city 1 S6C/ Zip 61 General Scope of Work - Original plans prepared by an architect or engineer, revisions must be signed & stamped by that person. 1 Elements revised: Plans Xcalculations E Soils Energy Other____________________________ 2 Describe revisions in detail 3 List page(s) where each revision is shown 4 List revised sheets that replace existing sheets (o1'iJoj oVep... Hoo 5-~f C .. "P 5 Does this revision, in any way, alter the exterior of the project? Yes 6 Does this revision add ANY new floor area(s)? El Yes No 7 Does this revision affect any fire related issues? Yes No 8 Is this a complete set? Yes 'J No Signature 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008 Phone: 760-602-2717/ 27 18/ 2719 www.carlsbadca.gov E] No Fax: 760-602-8558 EsGil Corporation In Partners/iip with government for Bui(&ng Safety DATE: 3/3/2010 JURISDICTION: City of Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 091204 rev(PCR10009) SET: II PROJECT ADDRESS: 2420 Pio Pico PROJECT NAME: Heitchew Residence Addition Revision LI ANT JURIS. LI REVIEWER LI FILE The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. LI The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. LI The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. LII The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. LI The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person LI REMARKS: By: David Yao EsGil Corporation EGA LIEJ EPC Enclosures: original approved plan 2/25 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576 EsGil Corporation In Partnersñip with government for Bui&1ing Safety DATE: 2/11/2010 JURISDICTION: City of Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 091204 rev(PCR10009) PROJECT ADDRESS: 2420 Pio Pica SET: I U APPLICANT JURIS. U EVIEWER U FILE PROJECT NAME: Heitchew Residence Addition Revision The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. IjjIj The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. ,The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. LII The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Daniel Monotijo 1825 McCauley Lane Carlsbad, CA 92008 El Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Daniel Monotijo Telephone #: 760-644-0714 Date contacted: Z-1 U.ôlf 0 (by: /r---) Fax #: 760-434-3854 Mail,_—Telephone_.-- Fax" In Person LII REMARKS: By: David Yao Enclosures: EsGil Corporation El GA LIEJ El PC 2/4 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego,California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576 City of Carlsbad 091204 rev(PCR10009) 2/11/2010 GENERAL PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: City of Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 091204 rev(PCR10009) PROJECT ADDRESS: 2420 Pio Pico DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY DATE REVIEW COMPLETED: ESGIL CORPORATION: 2/4 2/11/2010 REVIEWED BY: David Yao FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the International Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based-on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. The approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? C3 Yes El No City of Carlsbad 091204 rev(PCR 10009) 2/11/2010 Please make all corrections, as requested in the correction list. Submit three new complete sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760)602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468.. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans thatare submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. Provide framing sections through east end of the cupola (assume north is the top of the sheet) where the existing roof framing into the cupola. Section Al 06.1 .1. 2. Specify on the plans the new roof plywood sheathing and nailing pattern. IBC, Table 2304.7. Provide information and detail to show how the lateral force at new roof transfers to the foundation? Plywood shear walls at cupola walls? The calculation provided shows the new 51/4" PSL beam span 20 feet. Where is the supported for the north west of the PSL beam? On existing FB-4 beam? Adequate? Connection detail? The plan shows double stud to support the new 51/4" PSL beams. Are there new footings underneath the double studs? On the slab? Note on the plan that the new wall insulation, roof insulation and windows will be per existing T-24 sheet. To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: Yes El No U City of Carlsbad 091204 rev(PCR10009) 2/11/2010 9. The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact David Yao at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. END City of Carlsbad 091204 rev(PCR10009) 2/11/2010 (DO NOT PAY— THIS IS NOT AN INVOICE] VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: City of Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 091204 rev(PCR10009) PREPARED BY: David Yao DATE: 2/11/2010 BUILDING ADDRESS: 2420 Pio Pico BUILDING OCCUPANCY: TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE Jurisdiction Code Cb I By Ordinance Bldg. Permit Fee by Ordinance v Plan Check Fee by Ordinance [j I $250.001 Type of Review: El Complete Review El Structural Only Repetitive Fee El Other El Repeats Hourly 21 Hrs. @ * EsGil Fee $100.00 I $200.001 * Based on hourly rate Comments: Sheet 1 of 1 macvaiue.doc + J PLANNING/ENGINEERING APPROVALS PERMIT NUMBER PCR 10-09 DATE 2/2/10 ADDRESS 2420 Plo Pico Drive RESIDENTIAL ADDITION- POOL/SPA MINOR (4179000.00) TENANT IMPROVEMENT RETAINING WALL VILLAGE FAIRE COMPLETE OFFICE BUILDING OTHER new cupola over existing 113t floor sf residence PLANNER Chris So o DATE 2/2/10 ENGINEER______________ DATE___________ II:\ADMIN\cOUNTEIl/PLkNNING/ENCINEEIIING APPROVALS