The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2430 BUENA VISTA CIR; ; CB081615; Permit02-13-2009 Job Address Permit Type Parcel No Valuation Occupancy Group # Dwelling Units Bedrooms Project Title City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 Residential Permit Permit No CB081615 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 2430 BUENA VISTA CR CBAD RESDNTL 1552230300 $118,99700 1 1 Sub Type Lot# Construction Type Reference # Structure Type Bathrooms 2DU 0 VN MF2-4 1 SCHLESINGER RES-640 SF 2ND Status Applied Entered By Plan Approved Issued Inspect Area Ong PC# ISSUED 08/21/2008 RMA 02/13/2009 02/13/2009 DWELL UNIT W/122 SF STAIRS, DEMO AND REBUILD GARAGE Plan Check# Applicant WILKERSON RANDY&SCHLESINGER NANCY 2430 BUENA VISTA CIR CARLSBAD CA 92008 Owner WILKERSON RANDY&SCHLESINGER NANCY 2430 BUENA VISTA CIR CARLSBAD CA 92008 Building Permit Add'l Building Permit Fee Plan Check Add'l Plan Check Fee Plan Check Discount Strong Motion Fee Park in Lieu Fee Park Fee LFM Fee Bridge Fee Other Bridge Fee BTD #2 Fee BTD #3 Fee Renewal Fee Add'l Renewal Fee Other Building Fee HMP Fee Pot Water Con Fee Meter Size Add'l Pot Water Con Fee Reel Water Con Fee Green Bldg Stands (SB1473) Fee $660 09 Meter Size $0 00 Add'l Reel Water Con Fee $429 06 Meter Fee $0 00 SDCWA Fee $0 00 CFD Payoff Fee $1190 PFF (3105540) $0 00 PFF (4305540) $000 License Tax (3104193) $0 00 License Tax (4304193) $000 Traffic Impact Fee (3105541) $000 Traffic Impact Fee (4305541) $0 00 Sidewalk Fee $0 00 PLUMBING TOTAL $0 00 ELECTRICAL TOTAL $0 00 MECHANICAL TOTAL $0 00 Housing Impact Fee $0 00 Housing InLieu Fee $0 00 Housing Credit Fee Master Drainage Fee $0 00 Sewer Fee $0 00 Additional Fees 79 TOTAL PERMIT FEES $000 $000 $000 $000 $738 95 $682 10 $000 $000 $1,12800 $1,27200 $000 $48 00 $45 00 $70 00 $000 $000 $000 $000 $1,09600 $000 $6 181 10 Total Fees $6,181 10 Total Payments To Date $341 16 Balance Due $5,839 94 LDING PLANS >/ IN STORAGE Inspector Clearance NOTICE Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the 'ImpositionVJf fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as "fees/exactions You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions If you protest them you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for ' processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3 32 030 Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack review set aside void or annul their imposition You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity changes, nor planning, zoning grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Ave , Carlsbad. CA 92008 760-602-2717/2718/2719 Fax 760-602-8558 Building Permit Application Plan Check No (Mite Est Value PlanCk Deposit FV//( )*~t (<( L I JOB ADDRESS 2430 Buena Vista Circle • SUITES/SPACES/UNIT* "if BA'fHH'OOVIS OO TENANT BUSINESS NAME CONSTF TYPE V-N R-3 DESCRIPTION OF WORK Include Square Feet of Affected Area(s) PROPOSED ADDITION OF A SECONDARY DWELLING UNIT (640 S F UND ASSOCIATED CIRCULATION (122 S F ), REMODEL OF MASTER BEDROOM, BATHROOM & UTILITY AREAS (454 S FW ND RECONSTRUCTION OF GARAGE (514 S F ) EXISTING USE PROPOSED USE GARAGE (SF) Residence Residence 514 CONTACT NAME (If Different Fom Applicant) _. _ .Steven Berry, Architect ADDRESS PO Box 41 55 CITY STATE ZIP Big Bear Lake CA 92315 PHONE I FAX 909771-9148 ; EMAIL steve(o)bearvalleydesign com PROPERTY OWNER NAME . . _Nancy Schlesinger ADDRESS 2430 Buena Vista Circle CITY STATE ZIP Carlsbad CA 92008 PHONE j FAX 760 434-4993 I EMAIL catrancho(3>gmail com ARCH/DESIG\ER NAME & ADDRESS STATE LIC # Steven Berrv, Architect C-22.213 PATIOS (SF) DECKS (SF) FIR 64 YES APPLICANT NAME ADDRESS CITY Carlsbad PHONE 760 434-499 EMAIL EPLACE AIR CONDITIONING FIRE SPRINKtERS ' FT]* ««t N0[~] YESr~]NO|Vl YES | | NOfT] Nancy Schlesmqer 2430 Buena Vista Circle STATE ZIP CA 92008 FAX 3 catrancho(5)qmail com CONTRACTOR BUS NAME ADDRESS CITY PHONE EMAIL STATE LIC * STATE ZIP FAX CLASS CITYBLS UC» (Sec 70315 Business and Professions Code Any City or County which requires a permit lo construct alter improve demolish or repair any structure prior to its issuance also requires theapplicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor s License Law (Chapter 9 commending with Section 7000 Oi Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or that he is exempt therefrom and the basis for the alleged exemption Any violation of Section 7031 5 by any applicant lor a permit subjects the applicant to acivil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars |$500)) Workers' Compensation Declaration / hereby affirm tinder penalty of perjury one of the following declarationsHI have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self insure for workers compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued I have and will maintain workers compensation as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued My workers compensation insure nee carrier and policy number are Insurance Co PolicyNo Expiration Date This section need not be completed if the permit is for one hundred dollars (S100) or less | | Certificate of Exemption I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers Compensation Laws of California WARNING Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand doll.irs (8.100,000), in addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees J&Z CONTRACTOR SIGNATURE DATE r^V l£:/^-<' ^iSlfe- • -^W I hereby affirm that I am exempt from Contractors License Law for the following reason Bl I ! as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec 7044 Business and Professions Cod 3 The Contractors f** License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon and who does such work himself or through his own employees provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale If however the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion the owner builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale) I | I as owner of Ihe property am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec 7044 Business and Professions Code The Contractor s License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law) I I I 3m exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason 1 I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement I |Yes I JNo 2 I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work 3 I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name address / phone / contractors license number) 4 I plan to provideportions of the work but I have hired the following person to coordinate supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone / contractors license number) 5 I will provKJe/5Brne of the work but IjAe contract§|C(nired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone / type of work) DATE I -A 4lK**; V~tfT-:v?'-I ••& -'mt&x.. • •••'•••'••3m ws Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505 25533 or 25534 of the Presley Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? I I Yes L iNo j Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or aircjuality management district' LjYes I I No i Is the facility to be constructed within! 000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site7 I lYes I JNo IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work this permit is issued (Sec 3097 (i) Civil Code) Lender s Name Lender s Address .., _.asr: I certify that I have read the application and state thatthe above information rscoirectandthatthe information on the plans isaccurate I agreetocomply with all City ordinances and State laws relatingto building construction I hereby authorize representative of the City of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY C F CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES JUDGMENTS COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT i OSHA An OSHA permit is required for excavations oyer 5 0 deep and demotion or construction of structures over 3 stones in height ' EXPIFMTION Every permit issued by the Building0ffaal under the provision! of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such permit or rf the buipng or work authonzed bfy slch peprtt is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is commenced for a penochrf 180 days (Section 106 4 4 Uniform Building Code) ^APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE " // / j, ,S\ // W^t J DATE City of Carlsbad Final Building Inspection Dept Building Engineering Plamrmg CMWD St Lite Fire Plan Check* K>CC^^^tMr»xWw^kA4 Date 08/05/2009 Permit* CB081615 ^j^ C\*Jfc,^^Xuifowr- PermitType RESDNTL Project Name SCHLESINGER RES-640 SF2ND ..-_x Q^^ C&*v$j&^ 2DU DWELL UNIT W/122 SF STAIRS, DEMO AND REBUILDG^^ Address 2434 BUENA VISTA CR Lot 0 Contact Person PAT Phone 7602123550 Sewer Dist CA Water Dist CA Inspected Date By Inspected Approved Disapproved Inspected Date By Inspected Approved Disapproved Inspected Date By Inspected Approved Disapproved Comments City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For 08/05/2009 Permit* CB081615 Title SCHLESINGER RES-640 SF 2ND Inspector Assignment PC Description DWELL UNIT W/122 SF STAIRS, DEMO AND REBUILD GARAGE 514 SF.REMODEL454 SF OF EXISTING HOUSE, 2434 BUENA VISTA CR Lot 0 Type RESDNTL Sub Type 2DU Job Address Suite Location APPLICANT WILKERSON RANDY&SCHLESINGER NANCY Owner Remarks Phone 7602123550 Inspector Total Time CD Description 19 Final Structural 29 Final Plumbing 39 Final Electrical 49 Final Mechanical Requested By PAT Entered By CHRISTINE Act omments Comments/Notices/Holds Associated PCRs/CVs Original PC# Date 05/12/2009 05/12/2009 05/11/2009 05/05/2009 05/04/2009 05/04/2009 05/04/2009 05/04/2009 05/04/2009 05/04/2009 04/15/2009 04/08/2009 04/08/2009 Inspection History Description 17 Interior Lath/Drywall 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall 84 Rough Combo 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldmg 24 Rough/Topout 24 Rough/Topout 34 Rough Electric 34 Rough Electric 44 Rough/Ducts/Dampers 13 Shear Panels/HD's 83 Roof Sheathing/Ext Shear 98 BMP Inspection Act AP AP CA AP CO CO CO AP AP AP AP AP PA Insp PC PC PC PC PC PC PC PC PC PC PC PC PC Comments EXT WOOD SIDING OVER W P PAPER OK TO INSULATE CERT OK SEE LIST REVISED STRAPS PER RFI City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For 05/04/2009 Permit* CB081615 Title SCHLESINGER RES-640 SF 2ND Inspector Assignment PC Description DWELL UNIT W/122 SF STAIRS, DEMO AND REBUILD GARAGE 514 SF,REMODEL454 SF OF EXISTING HOUSE, f+e r»rr r\r Sub Type 2DU 2430 BUENA VISTA CR Lot 0 Type RESDNTL Job Address Suite Location Inspector APPLICANT WILKERSON RANDY&SCHLESINGER NANCY Owner WILKERSON RANDY E&SCHLESINGER NANCY L Remarks Phone 6199215218 Total Time Requested By PAT Entered By BARBARA CD Description 24 Rough/Topout 34 Rough Electric 44 Rough/Ducts/Dampers Act Comments L-lSf- Comments/Notices/Holds Associated PCRs/CVs Original PC# Inspection History Date 04/15/2009 04/08/2009 04/08/2009 03/26/2009 03/16/2009 03/16/2009 03/16/2009 03/10/2009 03/10/2009 03/1 0/2009 02/27/2009 Description 13 Shear Panels/HD's 83 Roof Sheathing/Ext Shear 98 BMP Inspection 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldmg 1 1 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 98 BMP Inspection 22 Sewer/Water Service 31 Underground/Conduit-Wiring 34 Rough Electric 1 1 Ftg/Foundation/Piers Act AP AP PA PA PA PA CO AP AP PA AP Insp PC PC PC PC PC PC PC PC PC PC PC Comments REVISED STRAPS PER RFI FLOOR NAIL INT FTG @ GARAGE INT HOLD DOWNS INSTALL MBPS El WADDLE AND BAGS UNDERFLOOR EMR CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMEN DATE LOCATION PERMIT NO NOTICE (760)438-3550 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE ^01 rr TO "Pi?up 15 FOR INSPECTION CALL (760) 438-3101 RE-INSPECTION FEE-PUE? FOR FURTHEUNFORMATION, CONTACT ____ I YES PHONE INSPECTOR CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER EsGil Corporation In Partnership witk~(}overnmentfor(BuiCd~ing Safety DATE 11/17/08 JURISDICTION Carlsbad "o~PLAN REVIEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO 08-1615 SET III PROJECT ADDRESS 2430 Buena Vista Circle PROJECT NAME Attached 2nd Dwelling/Deck/Remodel/Demo-New Larger Garage for Schlesinger Residence XI The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck The check list transmitted herewith is for your information The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to X] Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed Person contacted Telephone # Date contacted (by ) Fax # Mail Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS By Ray Fuller Enclosures Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC (P) 11/14/08 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 20S * San Diego, California 92123 4 (858)560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1:76 EsGil Corporation In (Partnership -with government for (Bmfding Safety DATE 11/O4/08 O^PELJCANT JURISDICTION Carlsbad a PLAN REVIEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO 08-1615 SET II ! PROJECT ADDRESS 2430 Buena Vista Circle PROJECT NAME Attached 2nd Dwelling/Deck/Remodel/Demo-New Larger Garage for Schlesinger Residence : The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck XI The check list transmitted herewith is for your information The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person XI The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to Nancy Schlesinger 2430 Buena Vista Circle Carlsbad, Ca 92008 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed XI Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed Person contacted Nancy Schlesinger Telephone # (760) 434-4993 Date contacted///5/6/^(b^^) Fax # Mai1 Telephone y/ Fax ^/\\\ Person REMARKS By Ray Fuller Enclosures Esgil Corporation n GA n MB n EJ n PC 10/30/08 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 * San Diego, California 92123 + (858)560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad 08-1615 11/04/08 RECHECK CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO 08-1615 PROJECT ADDRESS 2430 Buena Vista Circle SET II DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION 10/30/08 REVIEWED BY Ray Fuller DATE RECHECK COMPLETED 11/O4/08 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ) This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Building Code, Plumbing Code, Mechanical Code, Electrical Code and state laws regulating: energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department You may have other corrections based on haws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments The following items listed need clarification, modification or change All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations The approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law A B D To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews The original correction number has been given for your reference In case you did not keep a copy of the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding corrections Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans Have changes been made not resulting from this list?, QYes QNo Carlsbad 08-1615 11/04/08 NOTE The items listed below are from the previous correction list. These remaining items have not been adequately addressed The numbers of the items are from the previous check list and may not necessarily be in sequence The notes in bold are current. j 1 Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects) For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways 1) Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave , Carlsbad, CA 92009, (760) 602-2700 The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments 2) Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468 Deliver all , remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments NOTE Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete 23 Provide a letter from tho soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and specifications have boon reviewed and that it has boon determined that the recommondations in tho soils report are properly incorporated into the construction documents (when required by tho soil report)—If not providing a review letter from soils engineer as noted on sheet 9 then please provide a letter from client ; agreeing to assume responsibility for any potential claims that may arise during construction. Not necessarily a correction but could not determine why detail 9/S2-1 reflects 2 #4's at top of stem and 6/S2.1 is reflecting #5's as required per page 6. 28 Special Inspection required for all nailing 4" of less , epoxy anchors and soils compliance if required by soils report Not necessarily a correction but the cover sheet ( or S-0.1 )should reflect the list of requirements for special inspection as noted in various different places on the S sheets and may get missed 29 Anchor bolts shall be provided with square washers in accordance with Section ' 2305 3 11—Show 3" square x 0 229" plates on tho plans—Shoot s 2 1 is reflecting 2x2 x % and/or 3/16" Response was revised. The only place that appeared to be changed was detail 6/S-2 1. See 9/S-2.1, keynote 6 under shear panels on 3-2.1, details 6 and 9 on S1 1, shear schedule 12/S-2.2 etc. 33 For the deferred trusses noted on T-1 Please note on T-1 what the deferred item is ie. Trusses i Carlsbad 08-1615 11/04/08 • Verfiy that the final sets of plans and any new calculations will be stamped and signed by engineer and /or architect of record also • To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i e , plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc • Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate Yes El No Q ; The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123, telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Ray Fuller at Esgil Corporation Thank you EsGil Corporation In <PartnersRip -with government for <Bui(cfing Safety DATE 09/02/08 JURISDICTION Carlsbad a PLArTREVlEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO O8-1615 SET I PROJECT ADDRESS 2430 Buena Vista Circle PROJECT NAME Attached 2nd Dwelling/Deck/Remodel/Demo-New Larger Garage for Schlesinger Residence The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck XI The check list transmitted herewith is for your information The plans are being held at Eisgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck ', The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person X] The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to 2430 Buena Vista Circle Carlsbad, Ca 92008 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed XI' Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed Person contacted Nancy Schlesinger (v M) Telephone # (760) 434-4993 : Date contacted 9/t/O$ (by/<— ) Fax # ' Mail • Telephone''^ Fax In Person REMARKS ' By Ray Fuller Enclosures Esgil Corporationn GA n MB n EJ n PC 08/25/08 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 20S + San Diego. California 92123 *• (858)560-1468 * Fax (858) 560-15 76 Carlsbad O8-1615 09/02/O8 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES PLAN CHECK NO O8-1615 JURISDICTION Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS 2430 Buena Vista Circle FLOOR AREA Dwelling /Entry Stairs 762 Remodel 454 Demo- new garage 514 REMARKS DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED 09/02/08 STORIES 2 HEIGHT 23 ft per IBC DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION 08/25/08 PLAN REVIEWER Ray Fuller FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the International Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments Clearance from those departments rhay be required prior to the issuance of a building permit Present California law mandates that construction comply with the 2007 edition of the California Building Code (Title 24), which adopts the following model codes 2006 IBC, 2006 UPC, 2006 UMC and 2005 NEC The above regulations apply, regardless of the code editions adopted by ordinance ; The following items listed need clarification, modification or change All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations Per Sec 105 4 of the 2006 International Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i e , plan sheet number, specification section, etc Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans Carlsbad O8-1615 09/02/08 1 Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list • Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects) For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be ; submitted in one of two ways 1) Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave , Carlsbad, CA 92009, (760) 602-2700 The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad • Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments 2) Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil ; Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858): 560-1468 Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly lo the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments ; NOTE Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be ' reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review oy EsGil Corporation is complete 2 Provide a statement on the Title Sheet of the plans, stating that this project shall comply with the 2007 California Building Code, which adopts the 2006 IBC, 2006 UMC, 2006 UPC and the 2005 NEC Old codes noted on T-1, 3 Verfiy that the final sets of plans and any new calculations will be stamped and signed by engineer and /or architect of record also 4 Cover sheet to include in scope of work the 68 sq ft deck on A2-2 as well as 21 sg ft of conditioned space adding at master tub area (water heater compartment was non habitable) : 5 Could not determine why energy calculations are for 638 sq ft ? is the entry way and stairs to 2nd floor to be unconditioned space? If so note this on A-2 1 and/or A-2 2 and show door 20 to be as tight fitting weather-stripped door with walte-»n common to stair well reflecting required insulation If it is to be conditioned then revise sq footage in energy calculations to reflect additional fenestration and floor space (762) 6 Show route of discharge line to exterior for the water heater both relocated water heater and tankless water heater on A-2 2 7 The plans are reflecting separate cooking facilities and as such is consider to be a 2nd dwelling/duplex per the UBC 8 Per the NEC a minimum 100 amp panel must be provided to all dwellings Sub panel ok as long as tenant has direct access and not placed in bathroom, clothes closet etc Carlsbad O8-1615 09/02/08 9 Floor assemblies separating units in a duplex shall be of one-hour fire resistive construction Provide details of the assemblies Section 419 3 Detail and reference all supporting walls to have 1 hour support also 10 Walls assemblies separating units in a duplex shall be of one-hour fire resistive construction Provide details of the assemblies Section 419 2 Such wall assemblies shall extend to the underside of the roof sheathing, where applicable See entry wall of 2nd dwelling in common with master bath area for example Exceptions a) A fire-resistance rating of 1/2 hour shall be permitted in buildings equipped throughout with an automatic sprinkler system installed in accordance with Section 903 3 1 1 b) In California, wall assemblies in duplexes need not extend through attic spaces when the ceiling is protected by not less than 5/8-mch Type x gypsum board and an attic draft stop constructed as specified in Section 717 3 1 is provided above and along the wall assembly separating the dwellings The structural framing supporting the ceiling shall also be protected by not less than 1/2 -inch gypsum board or equivalent CBC Section 708 4, Exception 7 11 Provide a note on the plans stating "Penetiations of fire-resistive walls, floor- ceilmgs and roof-ceilings shall be protected as required in IBC Section 712 " 12 Floors separating units in a duplex shall have a sound transmission class (S~FC) of not less than 50 Additionally, floors must have an impact insulation class (IIC) rating of not less than 50 CBC Section 1207 3 Show the location of and provide details of the listed wall and floor/ceiling assemblies, and indicate the listing agency and listing number for the tested ratings 13 Recheck plans for tempered window locations i e within 2 ft of interior/exterior doors, shower/tub areas and stairwells if applicable Section 2406 3 See for example window 01 at master tub on A-2 1, windows 24, 27 and 29 on A2 2 Recheck all locations 14 All sleeping rooms shall have a window or exterior door for emergency escape Windows must have an openable area of at least 5 7 square feet (5 0 square feet for grade-floor openings), with the minimum openable width 20" and the minimum openable height 24" See upstairs bedroom windows 24 and/or 25 A 3036 (SH as shown on elevation) does not provide this Option is to change lo a casement If not adjust any affected energy and structural calculations required to meet minimum requirements listed above 15 Cannot clearly tell what type of windows proposing Under type on Window schedule on A-2 2 noting numbers but do not specify what these mean? 16 Please recheck all details to verify that they are complete and/or correct See for example See sections on A3 1 Carlsbad 08-1615 09/O2/O8 17 Show dryer vent to the exterior-maximum 14 ft with 2 elbows when 4" or 23 ft if 5" noted Termination to be a minimum of 3 ft from any opening Provide a dryer vent design that complies with the requirements of UMC 504 3 2 (14 feet maximum length w/ (2) 90°'s) If exceeding this limitations then submit a complying design, or provide an engineered solution, or provide the manufacturers installation instructions complete with Building Official approval for use of a specific brand of dryer UMC 504 322 See existing dryer on A1 1 18 Electrical plan to reflect locations (not general notes) of new T-24 requirements for all rooms i e photo control motion detectors, occupancy sensors, dimmers, verify plans reflect locations of required fluorescents/ high efficacy lighting etc The interior and exterior lighting energy design shall be fully detailed on the floor plans Notes are not acceptable Floor plan description to include fixture types and control methods demonstrating compliance with the following requirements In the kitchen at least one-half of the wattage rating of the fixtures must be high efficacy with non-high efficacy fixtures switched separately Note Approximately % of the fixtures will be required to be of the high efficacy variety In bathrooms, garages, laundry rooms, and utility rooms all fixtures must be high efficacy style or be controlled by a manually-on occupancy sensor All other rooms require any installed fixtures to be high efficacy or be : controlled by a manually-on occupancy sensor or dimmer (Closets under 70 square feet are exempt) 19 Provide stairway and landing details for both interior and exterior where applies Verfiy the following is reflected on the plans at all applicable locations Section 1009 a) Maximum rise is 7-3/4" and minimum run is 10" b) A nosing not less than 75 inch but not more than 1 25 inches shall be provided on stairways with solid risers where the tread depth is less than 11 inches 20 Detail and reference handrails required for any exterior and interior stairs per (CBC Section 1009 10) a) The handgrip portion of all handrails shall be not less than 1-1/4 inches nor more than 2 inches in cross-sectional dimension See Section 10123 for alternatives b) Handrails projecting from walls shall have at least 1-1/2 inches between the wall and the handrail c) Ends of handrails shall be returned or shall have rounded terminations or bends Carlsbad OS-1615 09/02/O8 21 Per City policy listed below a soil report is required for this project Provide a copy of the project soil report The report shall include foundation design recommendations based on the engineer's findings 22 In Seismic Design Categories D, E or F, the soils investigation must address liquefaction, and, if retaining walls are proposed, the soils investigation must address increased loading on the walls due to earthquake motions Section 180227 23 Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soils report are properly incorporated into the construction documents (when required by the soil report) 24 Specify on the foundation plan or structural specifications sheet the soil classification, the soils expansion index and the design bearing capacity of the foundation Section A1061 1 25 The soils engineer recommended that he/she review the foundation excavations Note on the foundation plan that "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building Department foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the building official in writing that a) The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report, b) The utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and c) The foundation excavations, the soils expansive characteristics and bearing capacity conform to the soils report " 26 Show distance from foundation to edge of cut or fill slopes ("distance-to- dayhght") and show slope and heights of cuts and fills Figure 1805 3 1 27 Note on plans that surface water will dram away from building and show drainage pattern The grade shall fall a minimum of 5% within the first 10 feet (2% for impervious surfaces) Section 1803 3 : 28 Special Inspection required for all nailing 4" of less ,epoxy anchors and soils compliance if required by soils report 29 Anchor bolts shall be provided with square washers in accordance with Section 2305 3 11 Show 3" square x 0 229" plates on the plans Sheet s-2 1 is reflecting 2 x 2 x % and/or 3/16" 30 Please show type and location of hold down anchors on foundation plan 31 Are proposed footings are to be tied to existing footings'? If so specify size, length and spacing of dowels, length of embedment and if epoxied the type and if special inspection is required Section 106 3 3 Carlsbad O8-1615 09/02/08 32 The right side of the garage is noted to be existing to remain on A-2 1 The foundation detail (11/S2-1) should reflect how underpinning existing foundation/stem wall and reflect new slab 33 For the deferred trusses noted on T-1 please add the following note "Submittal documents for deferred submittal items shall be submitted to the architect or engineer of record, who shall review them and forward them to the building official with a notation indicating that the deferred submittal documents have been reviewed and that they have been found to be in general conformance with the design of the building The deferred submittal items shall NOT be installed until their design and submittal documents have been approved by the building official" • CITY OF CARLSBAD REQUIREMENTS 34 All new residential buildings, including additions, require a soils report An update letter is required if the report is more than 3 years old If a room addition is less than 500 sq ft in area and only one story, then a soils report is not required 35 New residential units must be pre-plumbed for future solar water heating Note "two roof jacks must be installed" where the water heater is in the one story garage and directly below the most south facing roof (City Ordinance No 8093) Applies to 2nd dwelling 36 Note "two 3/4" copper pipes must be installed to the most convenient future solar panel location when the water heater is not in a one story garage and is not directly below the most south facing roof (City Ordinance No 8093) 37 All piping for present or future solar water heating must be insulated when in areas that are not heated or cooled by mechanical means (City Policy) j • To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i e , plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc • Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans • Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate Yes Q No Q • The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123, telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Ray Fuller at Esgil Corporation Thank you Carlsbad 08-1615 09/02/08 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION Carlsbad PREPARED BY Ray Fuller BUILDING ADDRESS 2430 Buena Vista Circle PLAN CHECK NO 08-1615 DATE O9/02/08 BUILDING OCCUPANCY R3 U TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION V-B BUILDING PORTION Dwelling Remodel Garage Deck Add 1st floor Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE Jurisdiction Code AREA (Sq Ft) 762 454 514 68 21 cb Valuation Multiplier '/ 101 99 U 5300 ' i 26 61y 1441 121 94 By Ordinance Reg Mod VALUE ($) | 77,716 24,062 13,678 980 2,561 • 1 • • • 118,997 i $660 09 Plan Check Fee by Ordinance , ^ , Type of Review 0 Complete Review L~j Structural Only CJ Repetitive Fee^ : Repeats D Other |—I Hourly Hour Esgil Plan Review Fee $429 06 $369 65 Comments Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue dot City of Carlsbad <^ V^MMIMMMHHHH^HIWM^H^^BIHB^BHBBHB^^BPublic Works BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST Engineer) DATE BUILDING PROJECT DESCRIPTION ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER (55"- ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL The item you have submitted for review has been approved The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal, therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to build D A Right-of-Way permit is required prior to construction of the following improvements EST VALUE DENIAL Please seex-the-Nattached report of deficiencies marked witrm.-^tfike necessary corrections to plans or specifications for, compliance with applicable codes and standards Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review By FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY ING AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE BUILDING PERMIT; ATTACHMENTS D Dedication Application D Dedication Checklist n Improvement Application Cl Improvement Checklist D Grading Permit Application D Grading Submittal Checklist D Neighborhood Improvement Agreement D Right-of-Way Permit Application [] Right-of-Way Permit Submittal Checklist and Information Sheet Q Storm Water Compliance Forms ENGINEERING DEPT CONTACT PERSON Name Linda Ontiveros City of Carlsbad Address 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008 Phone (760) 602-2773 CFD INFORMATION Recordation Carlsbad Tract 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92OO8-7314 • (76O) 602-272O • FAX (760) 6O2-8562 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST SITE PLAN Provide a fully dimensioned site plan draWn to scale Show orth Arrow xistmg & Proposed Structures xistmg Street Improvements Lines EujJ'Easements ight-of-Way Width ^Adjacent Streets Driveway widths ^c/^u fl^^V xistmg or proposed sewer later aM Existing or proposed water service Existing or proposed irrigation service 5T7\T6t>Show on site ramage Patterns Building pad surface drainage must maintain a minimum slope of one percent towards an adjoining street or an approved drainage course ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE "Finish grade will provide a minimum positive dpamage of 2% to swale 5' away from building " feting & Proposed Slopes and Topography ize, type, location, alignment of existing or proposed sewer and water service (s) at serves the project Each unit requires a separate service, however, second 'dwelling units and apartment complexes are an exception Sewer and water laterals should not be located within proposed driveways, per standards 3 Include on title sheet address Assessor's Parcel Number iVUf5 total building square footage with the square footage for each different use, existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing, warehouse, office, etc) previously approved EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST iST ISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE 4a Project does not comply with the following Engineering* ^*\ ^ , * £* f . _ f . ^^*^ —^•••^^•'•v °i ions of approval for'^^ —- X"W \ • T. H" ^^ CH CH CH 4b All conditions are in compliance Date D D nan DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS 5 Dedication for all street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the building site and any storm drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and for remodels with a value at or exceeding $ 17,000 . pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18 40 030 Dedication required as follows Dedication required Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8 Vz" x 11" plat map and submit with a title report All easement documents must be approved arid signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process Submit the completed application form with the required checklist items and fees to the Engineering Department in person Applications will not be accept by mail or fax Dedication completed by Date IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS Qa All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the construction exceeds $ 82,000 . pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 1840040 Public improvements required as follows Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public improvement requirements A registered Civil Engineer must prepare the appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements on the attached checklist to the Engineering Department through a separate plan check process The completed application form and the requirements on the BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST RD checklist must be submitted in person Applications by mail or fax are not accepted Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of building permit Improvement Plans signed by Date 6b Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 1840 Please submit a recent property title report or current grant deed on the property and processing fee of £441 rso we may prepare the necessary Neighborhood Improvement Agreement This agreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building permit Future public improvements required as follows n n n n n 6c Enclosed please find your Neighborhood Improvement Agreement Please return agreement signed and notarized to the Engineering Department Neighborhood Improvement Agreement completed by Date 6d No Public Improvements required SPECIAL NOTE Damaged or defective improvements found adiacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction of the City Inspector prior to occupancy n n GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section 15 16 010 of the Municipal Code 7a Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading requirements Include accurate grading quantities (cut, fill import, export) 7b Grading Permit required A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer must be submitted together with the completed application form attached NOTE The Grading Permit must be issued and rough grading approval obtained prior to issuance of a Building Permit n n n Grading Inspector sign off by Date 7c Graded Pad Certification required (Note Pad certification may be required even if a grading permit is not required ) BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST ,ST ND 7d No Grading Permit required 7e If grading is not required, write "No Grading" on plot plan MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS ODD RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT i 8 A Right-of-Way permit is required to do work in City Right-of-Way and/or private work adjacent to the public Right-of-Way Types of work include, but are not limited to street improvements, tree trimming, driveway construction, tying into public storm dram, sewer and water utilities To see requirements, visit our website www carlsbadca gov/engmeering Right-of-Way permit required for D D D D D D D D INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT 9 If your facility is located in the City of Carlsbad sewer service area, you need to contact the Carlsbad Municipal Water District, located at 5950 El Carrvno Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008 District personnel can provide forms and assistance, and will check to see if your business enterprise is on the EWA Exempt List You may telephone (760) 438-2722, extension 7153, for assistance Industrial Waste permit accepted by , Date NPDES PERMIT I 10 Complies with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit The applicant shall provide best management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to discharge to sensitive areas Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever occurs first STORM WATER COMPLIANCE l 10a U Requires Project Storm Water Permit) #PSP Gfy [Q1^, \ i Tierj/Tier II (Requires SWPPP) - Please complete attached forms Q Exempt - Please complete attached exemption form I Required fees are attached - v*|u. Q No fees required ££>p Af*P£Ov/VL-. ST >ND D D D a a a BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST WATER METER REVIEW~~ ~ " I 12a Domestic (potable) Use Ensure that the meter proposed by the owner/developer is not oversized Oversized meters are inaccurate during low-flow conditions If it is oversized, for the life of the meter, the City will not accurately bill the owner for the water used • All single family dwelling units receive "standard" 1" service with 5/8" service • If owner/developer proposes a size other than the "standard", then owner/developer must provide potable water demand calculations, which include total fixture counts and maximum water demand in gallons per minute (gpm) A typical fixture count and water demand worksheet is attached Once the gpm is provided, check against the "meter sizing schedule" to verify the anticipated meter size for the unit , • Maximum service and meter size is a 2" service with a 2" meter • If a developer is proposing a meter greater than 2", suggest the installation of multiple 2" services as needed to provide the anticipated demand (manifolds are considered on case by case basis to limit multiple trenching into the street) j 12b Irrigation Use (where recycled water is not available) All irrigation meters must be sized via irrigation calculations (in gpm) prior to approval The developer must provide these calculations Please follow these guidelines • If the project is a newer development (newer than 1998), check the recent improvement plans and observe if the new irrigation service is reflected on the improvement sheets If so, at the water meter station, the demand in gpm may be listed there Irrigation services are listed with a circled "I", and potable water is typically a circled "W" The irrigation service should look like STA1+00 Install 2" service and 5 meter (estimated 100 gpm) If the improvement plans do not list the irrigation meter and the service/meter will be installed via another instrument such as the building plans or grading plans (w/ a right of way permit of course), then the applicant must provide irrigation calculations for estimated worst-case nngation demand (largest zone with the farthest reach) Typically, Larry Black has already reviewed this if landscape plans have been prepared, but the applicant must provide the calculations to you for your use Once you have received a good example of irrigation calculations, keep a set for your reference In general the calculations will include • Hydraulic grade line ' • Elevation at point of connection (POC) • Pressure at POC in pounds per square inch (PSI) • Worse case zone (largest, farthest away from valve j • Total Sprinkler heads listed (with gpm use per head) , • Include a 10% residual pressure at point of connection 6 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST..ST 2ND 3RD • In general, all major sloped areas of a subdivision/project are to be irrigated via separate irrigation meters (unless the project is only SFD with no HOA) As long as the project is located within the City recycled water service boundary, the City intends on switching these irrigation services/meters to a new recycled water line in the future D C D 12c Irrigation Use (where recycled water is available) 1 Recycled water meters are sized the same as the irrigation meter above 2 If a project fronts a street with recycled water, then they should be connecting to this line to irrigate slopes within the development For subdivisions, this should have been identified, and implemented on the improvement plans Installing recycled water meters is a benefit for the applicant since they are exempt from paying the San Diego County Water Capacity fees However, if they front a street which the recycled water is there, but is not live (sometimes they are charged with potable water until recycled water is available), then the applicant must pay the San Diego Water Capacity Charge If within three years, the recycled waler line is charged with recycled water by CMWD, then the applicant can apply for a refund to the San Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA) for a refund However, let the applicant know that we cannot guarantee the reiund, and they must deal with the SDCWA for this D D D 13 Additional Comments: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET D * Estimate based on unconfirmed information from applicant P^ Calculation based on Address 2A^>O 'C*^ Prepared by EDU CALCULATIONS Types of Use vSi/^ Types of Use Types of Use Types of Use AD T CAL CULA TIONS Types of Use (. ~}f) \A Types of Use. Types of Use Types of Use building plancheck plan submittal :>Nr> VrSTfV G4C__ Bldg Permit NoC Date Checked by List types and square footages for all uses Sq Ft /Units CPiC-H / I Sq Ft /Units Sq Ft /Units Sq Ft /Units List types and square footages for all uses Sq Ft /Units (^-W^J/f Sq Ft /Units Sq Ft /Units Sq Ft /Units •to»6-«e(S- Date EDU's EDU's EDU's EDU's ADT's ADT's. ADT's ADT's FEES REQUIRED. B"NOWITHIN CFD D YES (no bridge & thoroughfare fee in District #1, reduced Traffic Impact Fee) NW QUADRANT NE QUADRANT SE QUADRANT SW QUADRANTD 1 PARK-IN-LIEU FEE FEE/UNIT NE QUADRANT X NO UNITS SE QUADRANT =$ 2 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ADT's/UNITS FEE/ADT 2,400 ,, 2,402 V \/*> BRIDGE AND THOROUGHFARE FEE ADT's/UNITS FACILITIES MANAGEMENT FEE UNIT/SQ FT /l^O m (DIST #1 DIST #2 X ZONE X FEE/ADT 1 FEE/SO FT /UNIT -3 DIST #3 ) = $ 5- =$ *sTf SEWER FEE EDU's X FEE/EDU tf a BENEFIT AREA EDU's ~ RAINAGE FEES ACRES U/A PLDA FEE/EDU "" =$ • HIGH /LOW > f££ Oyijt FEE/AC = $ f L ^(^yTrt^ 7 POTABLE WATER FEES UNITS CODE CONNECTION FEE METER FEE SDCWA FEE \FARMER\KATHY\MASTERS1FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET dOC2008 doc Rev 7/14/00 Memorandum TO Gma Ruiz, Project Planner FROM Clyde Wickham, Project Engineer DATE October 16, 2008 CDP 08-24 INKY'S SECOND DWELLING UNIT INCOMPLETENESS & ISSUES REVIEW Engineering Department staff has completed a review of the above-referenced project for application completeness The application and plans submitted for this proposed project are considered complete with issjjes remaining as discussed below On the site plan, verify drainage patterns and topography There is a drainage system in the south west corner of this project placed by the Casa Laguna project a few years ago Drawing^ should have detailed information showing this private storm dram thatalso serves this property 3? On the site plan verify the location of existing garden shed and adjacent property drainage between shed and fence (property line) to south Submit a completed Storm Water Requirement Applicability Checklist The checklist link for downloading is http //www carlsbadca qov/pdfdoc html?pid=432 \ 4 ) On the site plan, show cross section of Buena Vista Circle right of way and existing improvements Show edge of pavement, drainage patterns and direction of flow If ponding is evident show limits or proposed improvements to resolve ( 5 J On the site plan, show existing and proposed sewer, water and utility service locations If you or the applicant has any questions, please either see or contact me at extension 2742 Clyde Wickham Associate Engineer Development Services Division C Senior Engineer - Development Services Division ? /-T^- n 5 f" rH — s , r iiiP!=5m ^^ ^T 2^S^oooC t/5 2C o o V 2?u a cH O2 tart 53 2 H O ^ 1 NJ O The reference also explains the California Stormwaler Qualily Associalion(CASOAdesignalion and how lo apply Ihe various selected BMPs to a projects- 3 8 » a s f 1 Bill?ni "3 „ c ;?" 2 - 0- w t =• S ^ 5 n boxes provided for that purpose and place a check in the box immedisfrom Ihe hsi located alon the top of the form Then place an X in the bo^ected BMPs selected from the list For Example - If the project includeas Stabilized Construcion Ingress/Egress under Tracking Control Foil^ox where the two meet As another example say the project included aic in ihe blank column under ihe heading Krosion Control BMPs ThenDut what each BMP description means you may wish to review the BMTj° sr •£ < 01 £ 2. " 2 -5" 5 2 n oi x^sl-l-n x 3- 3- 3 ?! 2.— = w n =" n n of the added activily descriplhere the aclivity row intersecross dirl then check Ihe boxSite Access Across Dirt rowou intend to cover with a plahe box where Stockpiling iidoul prepared lo assist apphy a s = 5 <" oz * 2 S.S-S * - [Js a g g, 3. 3 | Illsls1 gff^ll 1 ?ti!!t i fiiiit c or more best managementi activity that was checked of"hen review the list for somction Ingress/Egress column athe list of BMPs then writec columnManagement Practice measur5 =S-!|Inslrucllons Begin by reviewing the list of construct!on aclivites and checkingthe box to the left of any activity thai will occur during the proposed construction Add any other activity descriptions in the blankOther (list)ED i !DewateringHazardous Substance Use/Storagec I 1 0) E. I 1?^Staging/Lay Down AreaWaste DisposalStucco/Mortar Work7 ^Conduit/Pipe Instaflatton1i s Concrete flatworkX * 1 V) I | 1 a 5CO Trenching/Excavation\Grading/Soil Disturbancely CASQA Designation ->Construction ActivityEC 7 ECS EC 9 EC 11 SE 1 SE3 SE-4 SE-5 SE6 SE 7 SE8 SE 10 TR-1 TR-2 NS-1 NS 3 NS 7 NS8 WM 1 WM-2 WM 3 WM^t WM 5 WM6 WM8 Best Management Practice(BMP) Description ->Geotextiles & Mats Wood Mulching Earth Dikes and Drainage Swales Siope Drams Silt Fence Sediment Trap Check Dam Fiber Rolls • Gravel Bag Berm Street Sweeping and Vacuuming Sandbag Barrier Storm Drain Inlet Protection Stabilized Construction Ingress/Egress Stabilized Construcion Roadway Water Conservation Practices Paving and Grinding Operations Potable Water/Irrigation Vehicle and Equipment Cleaning Material Delivery and Storage Material Use Stockpile Management Spill Prevention and Control Solid Waste Management Hazardous Waste Management Concrete Waste Management Erosion ControlBMPsSediment Control BMPsTrackingControl BMPsNon-Storm aterManagement BMPsWaste Management and MaterialsPollution Control BMPs1 1 1 1 i1 1 1 1 1 1 1 a a an an PLANNING DEPARTMENT BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST Plan Check No CB081615 Address 2430 BUENA VISTA CR Planner GINA RUIZ Phone (760) 602- 4675 APN 155-223-03-00 Type of Project & Use SOU Net Project Density DU/AC Zoning R-1-10000 General Plan RLM Facilities Management Zone 1 CFD (in/out) #_Date of participation Remaining net dev acres _ Circle One (For non-residential development Type of land used created by this permit J Legend Item Complete Environmental Review Required DATE OF COMPLETION Item Incomplete - Needs your action YES D NO [3 TYPE Compliance with conditions of approval7 If not, state conditions which require action Conditions of Approval Discretionary Action Required YES D NO [X] TYPE APPROVAL/RESO NO DATE PROJECT NO OTHER RELATED CASES Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action Conditions of Approval Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance Project site located in Coastal Zone' YES ^ NO Q CA Coastal Commission Authority? YES Q NO S If California Coastal Commission Authority Contact them at - 7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite 103, San Diego, CA 92108-4402, (619) 767-2370 Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt) MINOR COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT REQUIRED ^tfj&Q<? ^ 0£ AffW^D Habitat Management Plan Data Entry Completed? YES D NO £3 If property has Habitat Type identified in Table 11 of HMP, complete HMP Permit application and assess fees in Permits Plus (A/P/Ds, Activity Maintenance, enter CB#, toolbar, Screens, HMP Fees, Enter Acres of Habitat Type impacted/taken, UPDATE') Inclusionary Housing Fee required YES Q NO [X] (Effective date of Inclusionary Housing Ordinance - May 21, 1993 ) Data Entry Completed? YES D NO D (A/P/Ds, Activity Maintenance, enter CB#, toolbar, Screens, Housing Fees, Construct Housing Y/N, Enter Fee, UPDATE') H \ADMIN\Template\Buildmg Plancheck Review Checklist doc Rev 4/08 Site Plan 13 n n Provide a fully dimensional site plan drawn to scale Show North arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way width, dimensional setbacks and existing topographical lines (including all side and rear yard slopes) Provide legal description of property and assessor's parcel number Policy 44 - Neighborhood Architectural Design Guidelines D 1 Applicability YES D NO [X] D 2 Project complies YES D NOD Zoning 1 Setbacks Front Interior Side Street Side Rear Top of slope Required 20' Shown 20' Required Shown. Required Shown. Required Shown. Required Shown _ 2 Accessory structure setbacks N/A Front Interior Side Street Side Rear Structure separation Required Required Required Required Required Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown D D D 3 Lot Coverage 4 Height 5 Parking Required 40% MAX Shown 28 5% Required 30' MAX Shown 25' Spaces Required 2 Shown 2 (breakdown by uses for commercial and industrial projects required) Residential Guest Spaces Required 1 Shown 1 Additional Comments #1 A COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NEEDS TO BE APPLIED FOR AND APPROVED BEFORE THE BUILDING PERMIT CAN BE APPROVED BY PLANNING (SEE ATTACHED SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS) #2 SHOW THE LOT WIDTH AT THE FRONT YARD OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER f H \ADMIN\Template\Buildmg Plancheck Review Checklist doc Rev 4/08 Section 1 j Edward W Marshall, P E 800 337 7083 09-57 18, Tue Aug 19, 2008 3815 Sacramento Drive © 2008 E W Marshall La Mesa, CA 91941-6887 Licensed by the California State Board for Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors Ghent Inky's Mystery House Project SFR addition Location 2430 Buena Vista Circle, Carlsbad, CA 92008 Order of calculations 1 Code references, assumptions 2 Seismic base shear 3. Wind force evaluation 4 Snow load evaluation (as required) 5 Load combinations 6 Beams, joists, rafters, girders, etc 7 Footings 8 Shear panel design 9 Beam schedule 10 Shear panel schedule 1 0 Code References 1 2007 California Building Code (Part 2 of Title 24) •I ItJO12(XK> 3 ASCE7-05 "Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures" 4 AE3C "Steel Construction Manual", Thirteenth Edition 5 AF&PA/AWC "Manual for Engineered Wood Construction" 2005 Edition 2 0 beismic Base Shear USGS Hazard Mapping Information (http //earthquake usgs gov/research/hazmaps/) Conterminous 48 States 2006 International Building Code Latitude = 33 166139 Longitude = -117 350616 Spectral Response Accelerations SMs and SMI SMs = FaSs and SMI = FvSl bite (Jlass L> - *a = 10 ,tv = \ 5Ufo - Period Sa (sec) (g) 02 1 313 (SMs, Site Class D) 10 0 744 (SMI, Site Class D) SDs = 2/3 x SMs and SD1 = 2/3 x SMI Site Class D- Fa=10,Fv = 1506 Period Sa (sec) (g) 02 0 875 (SDs, Site Class D) 10 0 496 (SD1, Site Class D) V =JDS R W, V = Q 148W 12 14-11) (F = 1 10,SDS = 0 875,fl = 6 50) 3 0 Simplified Design Wind Pressure Simplifying assumption(s) incorporated 1 — End zone "A" pressures used for MWFRS in the projected 2 — Eave height is equal to plate height P>A = ^K*I PsA = 13 915, p,B = -7 139*, PaC = 9 196*. p,D = -4 Ol-MAY-2008 (A = 1 21, JiT* = 1 000,7 = 1 = 11 SOO,AM = -5 900,P<MC = 7 = -3 500) -2- 4 0 Snow Loads pf = 0 7 CeCtI pfli p, = 0 000 (Ce = l 00, Cf = 1 00, / = 1 00, pg = 0 0 psf) (7-1) (No snow loads present at this project location ) 5 0 Load Cases LC04 = 2 996 ksf Shear panel 2 uplift 2 8 EQ •« 1 070 ksf LC03 = 0 036 ksf Roof 1 0 RDL <S» 0 020 ksf + 1 0 RLL •§ 0 016 ksf LC02 = 0 065 ksf Deck 1 0 FDL a 0 005 ksf + 1 0 DECK <a 0 060 ksf LC01 = 0 057 ksf Floor 1 0 FDL '<S 0 010 ksf + 1 0 CDL ffl 0 007 ksf + 1 0 FLL © 0 040 ksf 6 0 Beam, joist, rafter analysis and design Abbreviation Description, typical IJoist member CF = Size factor, Table 4A typically n/a S = Section modulus K factor Fb = Allowable bending stress Resistive moment Fv = Allowable shear stress Vertical shear E = Elastic modulus El M'>M, M'>Fb'S, (Fi'=FbCDCuCtCL ) (521) V>V, V>2/3Ft,'A, (Fr'=F,,CDCi,CtCt) (531) Bl Garage door @ 16 0 ft 1 00 LDur (combined •& 1 00) Loading uniform LC02 4 00 ft tnb+ uniform LC01 C 00 ft tnb + concentrated LC04 1 s f tnb © station 3 0 ft Reactions 7 25 & 5 38 kips Vmax 7 25 kips Mrriax 24 02 kip ft at. 7 1 feet (Footingsiou 30" sq / 42" sq) o ID Member _ CF Area I S_ Fb Fv E Defl FOS-V_FOS-M A/L 0003" 35x160 PSL-DF-2 OE~ 0 97 56~00 11950 149 3 29000 02900 2000 0 '17 1'19 146 1/407 B2 Bedroom girder @ 22 0 ft 1 00 LDur (combined •& 1 00) Loading uniform LC01 11 00 ft. tnb Reactions 6 90 & 6 90 kips Vmax 6 90 kips Minax 37 94 kip ft at 11 0 feet (Footings 10 far 30" sq / 42" sq ) o ID Member CF Area 1 S Fb Fv E Defl FOS-V__FOS-M A/L 0011 5125x18 GLB-24F-V4 Too 9225 24910 276 8 2 4000 02400 1800 074 214 116 1/358 B3 Beam along Stair '9 6 0 ft 1 25 LDur (combined *j 1 25) Loading uniform LC03 14 00 ft tnb Reactions 1 51 &; 1 51 kips Vrnax 1 51 kips Mmax 2 27 kip ft at 3 0 feet (Footings i n for 16" sq / 20" sq) o ID Member CF Area 1 S Fb Fv E Defl FOS-V FOS-M A/L 0021 4x12 DFL #2 1 10 39 38 llo 3 73 8 0 9000 01800 1600 0 02" 3 91 3 36 1/3258 B4 Flush beam near soaking tub © 7 5 ft 1 25 LDur (combined a 1 25) Loading uniform LC03 14 00 ft tnb Reactions 1 89 & 1 89 kips Vmax 1 89 kips Mmax 3 55 kip ft at 3 7 feet (Footings-, nk»r 20" sq / 24" sq ) o_ ID Member __ CF_ Area I S Fb Fv E Defl_ F_O_S-V_ _FOS-M A/L 0025 1x10 DFL #2 1 20 32 38 230 8 19 9 0 9000 0 1800 1600 0 10" 2 57 1 58 I/ 926 B5 Header at flush beam @ 4 0 ft. 1 25 LDur (combined <« 1 25) Loading concentrated LC03 56 s f tnb 'a station 1 0 ft Reactions 1 51 & 0 50 kips Vmax 1 51 kips Mmax 1 51 kip ft at 1 0 feet (Footings ;ow 16" sq / 20" sq ) o ID Member CF Area I S Fb Fv E Defl FOS-V FOS-M A/L -3- 0031 4x10 DFL#2 120 3238 2308 199 09000 01800 1600 001" 321 372 1/5-161 B6 Beam over lower stair landing <§ 5 0 ft 1 25 LDur (combined 9 l 25) Loading uniform LC03 10 00 ft tnb Reactions 0 90 & 0 90 kips Vmax 0 90 kips Minax 1 13 kip ft at 2 5 feet (Footings i o k>r 16" sq / 16" sq ) o ID Member CF Area 1 S Fb Fv E Den FOS-V __FOS-M A/L 0031 4x10 DFL #2 120 3238 2308 199 1)9000 01800 1600 001" 540 499 1/4378 Jl Deck JOlStS (4 ft cant ) © 8 0 ft 1 00 LDur (combined « 1 00) Loading uniform LC02 2 67 ft tnb Reactions 0 69 & 0 69 kips Vmax 0 69 kips Mrnax 1 39 kip ft at 4 0 feet (Footings.; n i»r 16" sq / 16" sq ) o _ID Member CF Area 1 S Fb Fv_ E Den FOS-V FOS-M_ A/L 0035 4x8 DFL #2 TSo 2538 1112 307 09000 01800 1600 009' 139 215 1/1068 ,12 Upstairs joist too 11 0 ft 1 15 C rep (combined ® 1 15) Loading uniform LC01 1 33 ft tnb Reactions 0 42 & 0 42 kips Vrnax 0 42 kips Minax 1 15 kip ft at 5 5 feet (Footings iok,r 16" sq / 16" sq ) o ID Member CF Area I S Fb Fv E Defl FOS-V FOS-M__ A/L 0041 2x10 DFL #2 110 1388 989 214 09000 01800 1600 016" 459 177 1/836 J3 Downstairs joist © 8 0 ft 115 C rep (combined » 1 15) Loading uniform LC01 1 33 ft tnb Reactions 0 30 & 0 30 kips Vmax 0 30 kips Mrnax 0 61 kip ft at 4 0 feet (FootingsHIM- 16" sq / 16" sq ) o _1D _Member_ CF Area I S Fb Fv E _ Defl FOS-V FOS-M A/L 0051 2x6 DFL #2 130 825 208 76 09000 01800 1600 021" 375 140 1/457 HI SGD at deck © 8 0 ft 1 25 LDur (combined 4 1 25) Loading uniform LC03 5 00 ft tnb Reactions 0 72 & 0 72 kips Vmax 0 72 kips Mmax 1 44 kip ft at 4 0 feet (Footings in for 16' sq / 16" sq ) o ID Member CF Area 1 S Fb Fv E Defl FOS-V FOS-M A/L 0060 4x6 DFL #2 130 1925 18? 176 09000 01800 1600 021" 101 119 1/419 H2 Typical header © 4 0 ft l 25 LDur (combined :a 1 25) Loading uniform LC03 14 00 ft tnb Reactions 1 01 & 1 01 kips Vmax 1 01 kips Mrnax 1 01 kip ft at 2 0 feet (Footings i ow 16' sq / 20" sq ) o ID Member CF Area 1 S Fh Fv E Defl FOS-V FOS-M A/L 0064 4x6 DFL #2 130 1925 485 176 09000 01800 1600 004 286 213 1/1288 7 0 Lateral analysis and design Shear table reference values (15/32" APA-PRS Structural 1 sheathing) 'all-out A B C D C-C Nailing 10d-6" o c 10d-4" o c 10d-3" o c 10d-2" o c 1 10d-3" o c Seismic 340 plf 510 plf 665 plf 870 plf 1330 plf Wind "475 plf 715 plf 930 plf 1217 plf 1860 plf D-D 10d-2" o c _ 1740 plf 2435 plf Diaphragm input data Plate Height is 8 Exterior wall dead weight. = 16 psf. interior wall dead weight = 7 psf -4- Lcft Front Height % L2R Dia- to to of roof wall w/ phragm right back Wall% Load, Load, or wall F2B ID width depth Ext Dead Snow above wind A 5 ft 20 ft 50 % 15 psf 0 psf 2 ft 100 % B 25 ft 30 ft. 75 % 15 psf 0 psf 6 ft 100 % C 4 ft 16 ft (SO % 15 psf 0 psf 2 ft 100 % D 5 ft 20 ft 50 % 10 psf 0 psf 5 ft 100 % E 25 ft 30 ft 50 % 10 psf 0 psf 5 ft. 100 % Shear panel input data Reduced Righting Force Extra Combined ID length pier H trib load uplift panel pi 3 ft 6 7 ft 3 ft 15 psf - kips p2 5 5 ft 6 7 ft 3 ft 15 psf - kips p3 5 ft 3 ft 10 ft 15 psf - kips p4 6 ft 3 ft 10 ft 15 psf - kips p5 12 ft 3 ft 10 ft 15 psf - kips p6 9 5 ft 4 ft 3 ft 15 psf - kips p7 7 0 ft 4 ft 3 ft 15 psf - kips p8 9 0 ft 5 ft 10 ft 15 psf - kips p9 13 ft - ft 4 ft 15 psf - kips plO 3 ft 8 ft 5 ft 15 psf 1200 kips pll 2 07 ft 8 ft 5 ft 15 psf 1200 kips p!2 5 ft, G f t 10 ft 15 psf - kips p!3 13 ft 6 ft 10 ft 15 psf - kips p!4 11 ft - ft 4 ft 15 psf - kips p!5 5 ft - ft 4 ft 15 psf - kips p!6 9 ft - ft 10 ft 15 psf 763 kips p!7 4 ft - ft 4 ft 15 psf - kips p!8 7 ft - ft 4 ft 15 psf - kips Lines of force shear panels, individual forces, combining LOF's LOF ID Panels Wind % F2B Front Front Left Left wall w/ to to to to L2R back back right right wind LOF A LOF B LOF A LOF B 50 %~ 201 202 101 102 50 % 202 203 101 102 0 % 204 205 104 104 50 % 205 206 103 104 50 % 206 207 103 104 EQ Combining LOF's 101 pi p2 14G1 Ib s 1546 Ib s — 102 p6 p7 1461 Ib s 1546 Ib s — 103 plO pll 1565 Ibs HGSlbs 101 104 p!4 p!5 1565 Ib s 1541 Ib s 101 201 p9 209 Ib s 229 Ib s — 202 p8 1948 Ib s 1546 Ib s — 203 p3 p4 p5 1739 Ib s 1317 Ib s — 204 p!7 167 Ib s 187 Ib s — 205 p!8 480 Ib s 466 Ib s 201 206 plG 1879 Ibs 1168 Ibs 202 207 P12 p!3 1565 Ib s 889 Ib s 203 Abbreviation Description "EQ~= (T7QiT G = Uniform gravity load along panel G' = G factored by 60% RM = Righting moment on panel from G' or SSVV design shear OT = Overturning moment from LOF shear and panel pier height or SSW capacity Uplift = Uplift on panel without additional reactions added T--- -- Additional tension from upper panels or elements Total = Required design tension for holddown 2Bs/h = SDPWS-2005 section 4341 aspect ratio adjustment factor Design = Required design shear capacity of panel (• indicates EQ controls shear, wind controls uplift.) LOF 101 Avail panel 85ft [Forces (Wind 1161 Ibs / EQ 1516 Ibs)] Design shear 182plf-<j ID L H G G' R.M OT OT-RM Uplift T+ Total 2Bs/h Design pi "300 670 45 27 "l22 3657 3535 1178 0 1178 090 " 203 -5- p2 5 50 6 70 45 27 408 6704 0290 1145 0 1145 100 182 LOF 102 Avail panel 16 5 ft [Forces (Wind 1161 Ihs / EQ 1516 Ibs)] Design shear 94 plf- O ID L _ H G G' RM OT OT-R.M Uplift T+ Total 2Bs/h Design pC 950 ~ 4 00 ~45 27~ 1218 3561~ 2343 247 0 247 100 94 p7 7 00 4 00 45 27 6G2 2624 19G3 280 0 280 1 00 94 LOF 103 Avail panel 5 7 ft [Forces (Wind 3027 Ibs / EQ 2715 Ihs}] Design shear 534 plf- • ID L H G G' RM OT OT-RM Uplift T+ Total 2Bs/h Design plF" 30~6" 800~~" 75 45 20~2 12811 12608 4~2~03 "T200 5403 075 712 pll 267 800 75 45 160 11401 11241 4210 1200 5410 067 800 LOF 104 Avail panel 16 0 ft [Forces (Wind 3027 Ibs / EQ 3C188 Ibs)] Design shear 193 plf- O 2Bs/h Design 100 193 1 00 193 LOF 201 Avail panel 13 0 ft [Forces (Wind 209 Ibs / EQ 229 Ibs)] Design shear 18 plf- O ID L H G G' RM OT OT-R.M Uplift T+ Total 2Bs/h Design p9 1300 800 ~60 36 3042 1835 -1207 ~93~ 0 -93~ 100 18 ID p!4 ~ p!5 L 1100 500 H 800 800 G 60 60 G' 36 36 RM 2178 450 OT 16982 7719 OT-RM 14804 7269 Uplift ~~1346 1454 T+ 0 0 Tota 134i 145 LOF 202 Avail panel 90ft [Forces (Wind 1918 Ibs /EQ 1546 lbs)j Design shear 210 plf-< ID L H_ G G' RM OT OT-RM Uplift T+ __Jotal 2Bs/h Design p8 9 66" 5~00 150 90~"~" 3B45 "9740 6096 677" 0 "677 ~"" 100 216 LOF 203 Avail panel 23 0 ft [Forces (Wind 1739 Ibs / EQ 1317 lbs)j Design shear 76 plf- • ID L _ H G G' RM OT OT-RM Uplift T+ Toral 2Bs/h Design p3 ~ 500~ 300~" 150 " 90 Tl25 1134""" 9 2 0 2 1 00 76 p4 6 00 3 00 150 90 1620 1361 -259 -43 0 -43 1 00 76 p5 12 00 3 00 150 90 6480 2722 -3758 -313 0 -313 1 00 76 LOF 204 Avail panel 4 0 ft [Forces (Wind 167 Ibs / EQ 187 Ibs)] Design shear 47 plf- O ID L H G G' RM OT OT-RM Uplift T+ Total 2Bs/h Design p~17 "100 ""800 ~ 60 ""36 "288 149~31205 301 0 301 100 47 LOF 205 Avail panel 7 0 ft [Forces (Wind 689 Ibs / EQ 695 Ibs)] Design shear 99 plf- O ID _ L _ H_ G_ G' _ RM _OT OT-RM_ Uplift T+ Total 2Bs/h Design p!8 700 800 GO" 3G " 882 5561 4G79~ 668 0 668 100 99 LOF 206 Avail panel 9 0 ft [Forces (Wind 3827 II* / EQ 2715 Ibs)] Design shear 425 plf- O ID L H G G' RM OT OT-RM Uplift TV Total 2Bs/h Design p!6 9 00 8 00 150 90 3645 30013 26968 2996 763 3759 1 00 425 LOF 207 Avail panel 18 0 ft [Forces (Wind 330,r> Ibs / EQ 2206 Ibs)] Design shear 184 plf- O ID _ L _ H G G' RM OT OT-RM Uplift T^ Total 2Bs/h Design p"l2~500~ 000 150 90" 1125" 5508" 4383 "877 0 877 100 184 p!3 13 00 6 00 150 90 7005 14321 6716 517 0 517 1 00 184 7 1 Shear Analysis Summary Panel Pi p2 p3 p4 p5 P6 p7 P8 P9 plO pll p!2 p!3 p!4 p!5 plG p!7 p!8 Shear A" A A A A A A A A B C A A A A A A A Length 30 55 50 GO 120 95 70 90 130 30 27 50 130 110 50 90 40 70 Option 1 A B style HTT1G HTTIG - - - - - HTTIG —HDU8 HDU8 HTT16 HTTIG HTTIG HTT16 HDU8 - HTTIG Option 2 Embedded LSTHD8 LSTHD8 - - - - - LSTHD8 - No option No option LSTHD8 LSTHD8 LSTHD8 LSTHD8 No option — LSTHD8 -6- Option 3 Strap MSTC40 MSTC40 - - - - -- MSTC40 - MSTC52 MSTC52 MSTC40 MSTC40 MSTC40 MSTC40 MSTC52 —MSTC40 DBL-corner Uplift 1178 1145 2 -43 -313 247 280 G77 -93 5403 5410 877 517 134G 1454 3759 301 668 Uplift 1667 1619 3 -61 -443 349 397 958 -131 7642 7652 1240 731 1904 2056 5317 426 945 DBL-corner Embedded LSTHD8 LSTHD8 - - - - - LSTHD8 - No option No option LSTHD8 LSTHD8 STHD14 STHD14 No option - LSTHD8 Concrete grade beam Description Garage front Steel — (4) each #5 bars top, (4) each #5 bars bottom Footing — 2 ft wide, 3 ft deep, 10 ft long Overturning = P^ = 5168 Ibs x 8ft = 41344/f Ibs Weight of concrete = (DLW) x 150 = (3 00 ft 10 00 ft 2 00 ft ) x 150pcf = 9000 i Righting moment = Wcmc x -c"": = 9000 Ibs x ft = 45000/f Ibs2i iL Righting FOS = 45000/41344 = 1 09 Steel tension @ overturnmq moment = — -M (I 09) OT 496128 496128 29 0 x 1 227 35 59 _ 13941 MRT x 12..,„.,.,_ 540000 540000Steel tension @ nghtmg moment = . • —- = -- -— = -~—~ = 15174M Armr^arAreartllCLT 29 0 x 1 227 35 59 Steel te^ion overturning FOS =TensionOTdeMgn 20(X)0- 13941 20000 = 1 43 tu i i u. n /-i a oux,. , ,.Steel tension nghtmg F O S = - — """"™il = = 1 32Tension RTd>.slgn 15174 (1 43) (1 32) 8 0 Beam Schedule Option 0003"" 0011 0021 0025 0031 0031 0035 0041 0051 0060 006-1 ID Bf B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 .11 J2 .13 HI H2 Member 3 5x16 0 ~PSL-DF-2 OE 5 125x18 GLB-24F-V4 4x12 4x10 4x10 4x10 4x8 2x10 2x6 4x6 4x6 DFL#2 DFL#2 DFL#2 DFL#2 DFL#2 DFL#2 DFL#2 DFL#2 DFL#2 Description Spacing Garage door Bedroom girder Beam along stair Flush beam near soaking tub Header at flush beam Beam over lower stair landing Deck joists (4 ft cant ) (32" o/c) Upstairs joist (16" o/c) Downstairs joist (16" o/c) SGD at deck Typical header 204 205 t t p.17 p.11 First Floor Edward W. Marshall, P.E. C38462 619 954 8728 3815 Sacramento DR La Mesa, CA 91941-6887 ed@woowho.net Licensed by the California State Board for Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors Inky's Mystery House Addition 2320 Buena Vista Circle, Carlsbad, CA 92008 Mon Aug 04 11:40:09 PDT 2008 Second Floor Edward W. Marshall, P.E. C38462 6199548728 3815 Sacramento DR La Mesa, CA 91941-6887 ed@woowho.net Licensed by the California State Board for Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors Inky's Mystery House Addition 2320 Buena Vista Circle, Carlsbad, CA 92008 Mon Aug 04 11:40:09 PDT 2008 EAST COUNTY SOIL CONSULTATION AND ENGINEERING, INC. 10925 HARTLEY ROAD, SUITE "I" SANTEE, CALIFORNIA 92071 (619) 258-7901 Fax 258-7902 Nancy Schlesmger October 15, 2008 2430 Buena Vista Circle Project No 08-1106D4 Carlsbad, California 92008 Subject Limited Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Second Story Addition 2430 Buena Vista Circle City of Carlsbad, California Dear Ms Schlesmger In accordance with your request, we have performed a limited investigation of the soil conditions at the subject site to provide recommendations for the proposed second-story addition Our investigation has found that the area of the proposed addition is underlain by topsoil and colluvium to a depth of approximately 5 feet below existing grade The colluvium was underlain by dense sandstone of the Terrace Deposits Formation to the explored depth of 7 feet It is our opinion that the construction of the proposed addition is geotechmcally feasible provided the recommendations herein are implemented in the design and construction Respectfully submitted, Mamadou Saliou Diallo, P E RCE 54071,GE 2704 MSD/md C&CfclbtS EAST COUNTY SOIL CONSULTATION AND ENGINEERING, INC 10925 HARTLEY ROAD, SUITE "I" SANTEE, CALIFORNIA 92071 619 258-7901 Fax 619 258-7902 February 25, 2009 Project No 08-1106D4 Nancy Schlesmger 2430 Buena Vista Circle Carlsbad, California 92008 Subject Foundation Excavation Observation Proposed Second Story Addition 2430 Buena Vista Circle City of Carlsbad, California Reference "Limited Geotechmcal Investigation, Proposed Second Story Addition, 2430 Buena Vista Circle, City of Carlsbad, California", Project No 08-1106D4, Prepared by East County Soil Consultation and Engineering, Inc , Dated October 15,2008 Dear Ms Schlesmger In accordance with your request, we have observed the foundation excavations for the proposed second story addition at the subject site The footings have been excavated to the proper depth and width into competent bearing soils and are m compliance with the approved building plans Foundation excavations, soil expansion characteristics and soil bearing capacity are in accordance with the referenced geotechmcal investigation report In addition, the utility trenches under and adjacent to the footings have been properly backfilled and compacted If we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact our office ^****'~ ^5SjRespectfully .submitted,1 Mamadou Sahou Diallo, P E RCE 54071,GE 2704 MSD\md NANCY SCHLESINGER PROJECT NO 08-1106D4 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 3 SCOPE OF SERVICES 3 SITE DESCRIPTION AND PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION 3 FIELD INVESTIGATION AND LABORATORY TESTING 4 GEOLOGY 4 Geologic Setting 4 Site Stratigraphy 4 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION 5 Compressible Soils 5 Expansive Soils 5 Groundwater 5 2007 CBC Seismic Design Catena 5 Liquefaction 6 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 6 FOUNDATIONS AND SLABS 6 PRESATURATION OF SLAB SUBGRADE 7 SETTLEMENT 7 TEMPORARY SLOPES 7 TRENCH BACKFILL 7 DRAINAGE 7 FOUNDATION EXCAVATION OBSERVATION 8 LIMITATIONS OF INVESTIGATION 8 ADDITIONAL SERVICES 9 PLATES Plate 1- Location of Exploratory Boreholes Plate 2 - Summary Sheet (Exploration Borehole Logs) Plate 3 - USCS Soil Classification Chart LABORATORY TEST RESULTS 11 REFERENCES 12 NANCY SCHLESINGER PROJECT NO 08-1106D4 INTRODUCTION This is to present the findings and conclusions of a limited geotechmcal investigation for a proposed second story addition to the existing garage located at 2430 Buena Vista Circle, in the City of Carlsbad, California The objectives of the investigation were to evaluate the existing soils conditions and piovide recommendations for the proposed construction SCOPE OF SERVICES The following services were provided during this investigation O Site reconnaissance and review of published geologic, seismological reports and maps pertinent to the project area O Subsurface exploration consisting of two (2) boreholes within the limits of the proposed area of improvement The boreholes were logged by our Staff Geologist O Collection of representative soil samples at selected depths The obtained samples were sealed in moisture-resistant containers and transported to the laboratory for subsequent analysis O Laboratory testing of samples representative of the types of soils encountered during the field investigation O Geologic and engineering analysis of the field and laboratory data, which provided the basis for our conclusions and recommendations O Production of this report, which summarizes the results of the above analysis and presents our findings and recommendations for site improvement SITE DESCRIPTION AND PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION The subject site is a residential lot located on the south side of Buena Vista Circle, in the City of Carlsbad, California The property which is occupied by a one-story house is relatively level with general drainage to the southeast Vegetation consisted of a few trees, grass and landscaping plants No architectural drawings were available at the time of this investigation It is our understanding that the proposed construction will include a second story, wood-framed addition to the existing garage The front and side walls of the garage will be extended out a few feet to accommodate a stairway to the second story NANCY SCHLESINGER PROJECT NO 08-1106D4 FIELD INVESTIGATION AND LABORATORY TESTING On October 3, 2008, two boreholes were drilled to a maximum depth of 7 feet below existing grade with a hand auger The approximate locations of the boreholes are shown on the attached Plate No 1, entitled "Location of Exploratory Boreholes" A continuous log of the soils encountered was recorded at the time of drilling and is shown on Plate No 2 entitled "Summary Sheet" The soils were visually and texturally classified according to the filed identification procedures set forth on the attached Plate No 3 entitled "USCS Soil Classification" Following the field exploration, laboratory testing was performed to evaluate the pertinent engineering properties of the foundation materials The laboratory-testing program included moisture and density, particle size analysis, Atterberg limits and expansion index tests These tests were performed in general accordance with ASTM standards and other accepted test methods Page L-l and Plate No 2 provide a summary of the laboratory test results GEOLOGY Geologic Setting The subject site is located within the southern portion of what is known as the Peninsular Ranges Geomorphic Province of California The geologic map pertaining to the area indicates that the subject site is underlain by sandstone of the Terrace Deposits Formation (Qt) Site Stratigraphy The subsurface descriptions provided are interpreted from conditions exposed during the field investigation and/or inferred from the geologic literature As such, all of the subsurface conditions may not be represented Detailed descriptions of the subsurface materials encountered during the field investigation are presented on the exploration logs shown on Plate No 2 The following paragraphs provide general descriptions of the encountered soil types Topsoil is the surficial soil material that mantles the ground, usually containing roots and other organic materials, which supports vegetation Topsoil observed in the boreholes was generally 6-inch thick and consisted of dark brown, silty sand that was dry, loose and porous in consistency with minor amounts of organics (roots and rootlets) Colluvium Colluvium was underlying the topsoil in the boreholes and consisted of brown sandy clay that was moist and medium stiff in consistency The thickness of the Colluvium was approximately 5 feet NANCY SCHLESINGER PROJECT NO 08-1106D4 Marine Terrace Deposits (Qt) Terrace deposits were observed below colluvium They generally consisted of reddish brown, silty fine sand which was moist and medium dense to dense in consistency GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION Based on our field investigation and evaluation of the collected information, we conclude that the proposed structural improvement is feasible from a geotechmcal standpoint provided the recommendations herein will be properly implemented during construction The foundations may consist of reinforced continuous footings supported by the existing medium stiff subgrade Recommendations and criteria for foundation design are presented in the Foundation and Slab recommendations section of this report Compressible Soils Our field observations and testing indicate low compressibility within the colluvium and sandstone of the Terrace Deposits Formation, which underlies the area of the proposed addition However, these expansive soils at shallow depths, upon loading and introduction of excessive moisture are expected to consolidate and expand In order to mitigate the potential for settlement and expansion, special foundation recommendations are provided Expansive Soils An expansion index test was performed on representative sample of the colluvium to determine volumetric change characteristics with change in moisture content An expansion index of 62 was obtained which indicate a medium expansion potential for the foundation soils Groundwater Static groundwater was not encountered to the depths of our boreholes The subject site is located at an elevation of approximately 75 feet above Mean Sea Level We do not expect groundwater to affect the proposed construction Recommendations to prevent or mitigate the effects of poor surface drainage are presented in the Drainage section of this report 2007 CBC Seismic Design Criteria A review of the active fault map pertaining to the site indicates the existence of the Rose Canyon Fault Zone approximately 8 km to the west Ground shaking from this fault or one of the major active faults in the region is the most likely happening to affect the site With respect 10 this hazard, the site is comparable to others in the general area The proposed second story addition should be designed in accordance with seismic design requirements of the 2007 California Building Code or the Structural Engineers Association of California using the following seismic design parameters NANCY SCHLESINGER PROJECT NO 08-1106D4 PARAMETER X Site Class Mapped Spectral Acceleration For Short Periods, Ss Mapped Spectral Acceleration For a 1 -Second Period, Si Site Coefficient, Fa Site Coefficient, Fv , "V:: ... VALUE .!• D 1 1 04 1 1 1 6 2007 CBC REFERENCE Table 1613 52 Figure 1613 5(3) Figure 1613 5(4) Table 1613 5 3(1) Table 161353(2) Liquefaction Based on the absence of shallow ground-water, type and consistency of the subgrade soils, it is our opinion that the potential for liquefaction is very low CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The following conclusions and recommendations are based upon the analysis of the data and information obtained from our soil investigation This includes site reconnaissance, field investigation, laboratory testing and our general knowledge of the soils native to the site The site is suitable for the proposed second story addition provided the recommendations set forth are implemented during construction FOUNDATIONS AND SLABS Our field investigation indicates that the area of the proposed addition is underlain by the moderately expansive sandy clay with a medium stiff consistency The existing garage is supported by a continuous strip foundation with a slab-on-grade floor Exterior footings are approximately 12-mchdeep Following clearing and grubbing, i e the removal of vegetation and topsoil, the proposed addition may be supported by the existing subgrade a Continuous footings are suitable for use and should extend a minimum of 24 inches for the proposed one-story residence into the subgrade soils Continuous footings should be at least 12 inches in width and reinforced with a minimum of four #5 steel bars, two bars placed near the top of the footings and the other two bars placed near the bottom of the footings New footings should be dowelled to the existing footings according to the structural engineer requirements b Interior concrete floor slabs should be a minimum of 4 inches thick Reinforcement should consist of #3 bars placed at 12 inches on center each way within the middle third of the slab by supporting the steel on chairs or concrete blocks "dobies" The slabs should be underlain by 2 inches of clean sand over a 10-mil visqueen moisture barrier and a capillary break at least 4 inches thick, consisting of coarse sand, gravel or crushed rock not exceeding 3/4 inch in size with no more than 5 percent passing the #200 sieve The effect of concrete shrinkage will result in cracks in virtually all concrete slabs To reduce the extent of shrinkage, the concrete should be placed at a NANCY SCHLESINGER PROJECT NO 08-1106D4 maximum of 4-mch slump The minimum steel recommended is not intended to prevent shrinkage cracks c An allowable soil bearing value of 1,500 pounds per square foot may be used for the design of the above footings founded into the colluvmm This value may be increased by 300 psf for each additional foot of depth to a maximum value of 3,000 Ib/ft2 d Lateral loads against foundations or retaining structures may be resisted by adhesion between the bottom of the footing and the supporting soil A lateral sliding resistance of 130 psf may be utilized in the foundation design Alternatively, an allowable passive earth pressure of 100 psf/ft (lOOpcf EFP) may be used A one-third increase in the soil bearing value and lateral resistance may be considered for transient loads (wind/seismic) PRESATURATION OF SLAB SUBGRADE Perimeter foundations and interior slabs should be thoroughly saturated for 24 hours prior to placement of concrete SETTLEMENT While subjected to structural loading, a differential settlement up to one-quarter inch should be anticipated, with corresponding total settlement up to three-quarter inch across the structural span The values for structure adjustment assume that footings are founded into the medium stiff colluvium, and that proper surface drainage is implemented such that the subsoil moisture content is mamlamed relatively constant TEMPORARY SLOPES Excavations for foundations or on-site utility trenches may be made vertically for shallow depths and must be either shored or sloped at 1H IV for depths greater than 4 feet, OSHA guidelines for trench excavation safety should be observed during construction TRENCH BACKFILL Excavations for utility lines, which extend under structural areas should be properly backfilled and compacted Utilities should be bedded and backfilled with clean sand or approved granular soil to a depth of at least one foot over the pipe This backfill should be uniformly watered and compacted to a firm condition for pipe support The remainder of the backfill should be on-site soils or non- expansive imported soils, which should be placed in thin lifts, moisture-conditioned and compacted to at least 90% relative compaction DRAINAGE Adequate measures should be undertaken to properly finish grade the site after the addition and other improvements are in place, such that the drainage water within the site and adjacent properties is directed away from the foundations, footings, floor slabs and the tops of slopes via NANCY SCHLESINGER PROJECT NO 08-1106D4 ram gutters, downspouts, surface swales and subsurface drains towards the natural drainage for this area A minimum gradient of 1 percent is recommended in hardscape areas For earth areas, a minimum gradient of 5 percent away from all structures for a distance of at least 5 feet should be provided Earth swales should have a minimum gradient of 2 percent Drainage should be directed to approved drainage facilities Proper surface and subsurface drainage will be required to minimize the potential of water seeking the level of the bearing soils under the foundations, footings and floor slabs, which may otherwise result in undermining and differential settlement of the new addition and other improvements FOUNDATION EXCAVATION OBSERVATION Foundation excavations should be observed by our representative prior to the placement of forms, reinforcement or concrete for conformance with the plans and specifications LIMITATIONS OF INVESTIGATION Our investigation was performed using the skill and degree of care ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable soils engineers and geologists practicing in this or similar localities No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the conclusions and professional advice included in this report This report is prepared for the sole use of our client and may not be assigned to others without the written consent of the client and ECSC&E, Inc The samples collected and used for testing, and the observations made, are believed representative of site conditions, however, soil and geologic conditions can vary significantly between exploration borings, test pits and surface exposures As in most major projects, conditions revealed by construction excavations may vary with preliminary findings If this occurs, the changed conditions must be evaluated by a representative of ECSCE and designs adjusted as required or alternate designs recommended This report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the owner, or of his representative to ensure that the information and recommendations contained herein are brought to the attention of the project architect and engineer Appropriate recommendations should be incorporated into the structural plans The necessary steps should be taken to see that the contractor and subcontractors carry out such recommendations in the field The findings of this report are valid as of this present date However, changes in the conditions of a property can occur with the passage of time, whether they are due to natural processes or the works of man on this or adjacent properties In addition, changes in applicable or appropriate standards may occur from legislation or the broadening of knowledge Accordingly, the findings of this report may be invalidated wholly or partially by changes outside of our control Therefore, this report is subject to review and should be updated after a period of two years NANCY SCHLESINGER PROJECT NO 08- 1106D4 ADDITIONAL SERVICES The review of plans and specifications, field observations and testing under our direction are integral parts of the recommendations made in this report If East County Soil Consultation and Engineering, Inc is not retained for these services, the client agrees to assume our responsibility for any poiential claims that may arise during construction Observations and testing are additional services, which are provided by our firm, and should be budgeted within the cost of development Plates No 1 through 3, Page L-l and References are parts of this report Respectfully submitted, Mamadou Sahou Diallo, P E RCE 54071,GE 2704 MSD/md EAST COUNTY SOIL CONSULTATION & ENGINEERING, INC 10925 HARTLEY RD SUITE 1 SANTEE CA 92071 (619)258-7901 Fax (619) 258-7902 NANCY SCHLESINGER PROJECT NO 08-1106D4 DEPTH Surface 05' 1 5' 20' 30' 55' 70' PLATE NO. 2 SUMMARY SHEET BOREHOLE NO. 1 SOIL DESCRIPTION TOPSOIL dark brown, dry, loose, porous, silty fine sand with rootlets COLLUVIUM (Qal) brown, moist, medium stiff, sandy clay (.(. £t it. ;t gray brown, moist, medium stiff, sandy clay tt ct ct c; TERRACE DEPOSITS FORMATION (Qt) reddish brown, moist, medium dense to dense, silty fine sand bottom of borehole, no caving, no groundwater borehole backfilled 10/3/08 Y M 110 1 1103 127 138 DEPTH Surface 05' 1 5' 20' 50' 60' BOREHOLE NO. 2 SOIL DESCRIPTION TOPSOIL dark brown, dry, loose, porous, silty fine sand with rootlets COLLUVIUM (Qal) brown, moist, medium stiff, sandy clay U tt ti ;c gray brown, moist, medium stiff, sandy clay TERRACE DEPOSITS FORMATION (Qt) reddish brown, moist, medium dense to dense, silty line sand bottom of borehole, no caving, no groundwater borehole backfilled 10/3/08 Y M 1148 124 Y = DRY DENSITY M = MOISTURE CONTENT 10 MAJOR DIVISIONS COARSE GRAINED SOILS (MORE THAN >A OF SOIL > NO 200 SIEVE SIZE) FINE GRAINED SOILS (MORE THAN 'A OF SOIL < NO 200 SIEVE SIZE) GRAVELS (MORE THAN 'A OF COARSE FRACTION >NO 4 SIEVE SIZE) SANDS (MORE THAN 'A OF COARSE FRACTION < NO 4 SIEVE SIZE) SILTS & CLAYS LIQUID LIMIT <50 SILTS & CLAYS LIQUID LIMIT >50 HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS SYMBOL GW GP GM GC sw SP SM SC ML CL OL MH CH OH Pt DESCRIPTION WELL GRADED GRAVELS OR GRAVEL- SAND MIXTURES, LITTLE OR NO FINES POORLY GRADED GRAVELS OR GRAVEL-SAND MIXTURES, LITTLE OR NO FINES SILTY GRAVELS, GRAVEL-SAND-SILT MIXTURES CLAYEY GRAVELS, GRAVEL-SAND-CLAY MIXTURES WELL GRADED SANDS OR GRAVELLY SANDS, LITTLE OR NO FINES POORLY GRADED SANDS OR GRAVELLY SANDS, LITTLE OR NO FINES SILTY SANDS, SILT-SAND MIXTURES CLAYEY SANDS, SAND-CLAY MIXTURES INORGANIC SILTS AND VERY FINE SANDS, ROCK FLOUR, SILTY OR CLAYEY FINE SANDS OR CLAYEY SILTS WITH SLIGHT PLASTICITY INORGANIC CLAYS OF LOW TO MEDIUM PLASTICITY, GRAVELLY CLAYS, SANDY CLAYS, SILTY CLAYS, LEAN CLAYS ORGANIC SILTS AND ORGANIC SILTY CLAYS OF LOW PLASTICITY INORGANIC SILTS, MICACEOUS OR DIATOMACEOUS FINE SANDY OR SILTY SOILS. ELASTIC SILTS INORGANIC CLAYS OF HIGH PLASTICITY, FAT CLAYS ORGANIC CLAYS OF MEDIUM TO HIGH PLASTICITY, ORGANIC SILTY CLAYS. ORGANIC SILTS PE\T AND OTHER HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS CLASSIFICATION CHART (UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM) CLASSIFICATION BOULDERS COBBLES GRAVEL Coarse Fine SAISD Coarse Medium Fine SILT AND CLAY RA;SGE OF GRAIN SIZES US STANDARD SIEVE SIZE Above 12 Inches 12 Inches To 3 Inches 3 Inches to No 4 3 Inches to V* Inch % Inch to No 4 No 4 to No 200 No 4 to No 10 No 10 to No 40 No 40 to No 200 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS Above 305 305 To 76 2 76 2 to 4 76 76 2 to 19 1 19 1 to 4 76 4 76 to 0 074 4 76 to 2 00 2 00 to 0 420 0 420 to 0 074 Below No 200 I Below 0 074 80 X I50 x i " ? 20 A \ V I/ JZL I/, I/ 1Q 20 JO *O SO SO 70 £0 30 UQUIO JMiT J'j. " GRAIN SIZE CHART PLASTICITY CHART EAST COUNTY SOIL CONSULTATION AND ENGINEERING, INC 10925 HARTLEY ROAD, SUITE "I" SANTEE, CALIFORNIA 92071 U.S.C.S. SOIL CLASSIFICATION NANCY SCHLESINGER PROJECT PROJECT NO. 08-1106D4 PLATE NO. 3 OCTOBER 15, 2008 NANCY SCHLESINGER PROJECT NO 08-1106D4 PAGE L-l LABORATORY TEST RESULTS 129 EXPANSION INDEX TEST (ASTM D4829) INITIAL MOISTURE CONTENT(%) SATURATED MOISTURE CONTENT(%) INITIAL DRY DENSITY EXPANSION (PCH INDEX LOCATION 28 1 997 62 BH-1 (a) 1 5' PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS (ASTM D422) \ *K '"" "-i ^ U S. Standard. ?; ^ Sieve Size '^ ' l F . %,: ": * •<• •* 1" 1/2" 3/8" #4 #8 #16 #30 #50 #100 #200 uses ..,, * ,;" ^ .Percent Passing >. BH-%OV\, "" Topsoif" W' - - - 100 99 93 71 50 41 SM - -•#•••*-,* .,,.: #oPercent Passing *- BH-%@M 5\ V ,;• ^olluvium^ ,^ - - - 100 99 95 81 60 52 CL JjK;. "if; .. Percent Passing 5i^ MBH-1 @,4 5'^;: ;^j ^^ v- Colluvium ' - - 100 99 98 96 88 69 60 CL TS. •;;• \ \ ^ * V-.. "'Percent Passing ' • ;;JBH-1 @% (F '** ^, Terrace Deposits ;s - - - - 100 94 51 48 42 SM 11 NANCY SCHLESINGER PROJECT NO 08-1106D4 REFERENCES 1 "Limited Geotechmcal Investigation, Proposed Two-Story Residential Addition, 3434 Madison Street, City of Carlsbad, California", Project No 08-1106E6, Prepared by East County Soil Consultation and Engineering, Inc , Dated April 3, 2008 2 "2007 California Building Code, California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 2, Volume 2 of 2", Published by International Code Council 3 "Limited Site Investigation, Proposed Two-Story, Single Family Residence, 3546 Highland Drive, City of Carlsbad, California", Project No 06-1106F5(1), Prepared by East County Soil Consultation and Engineering, Inc , Dated March 2, 2006 4 "Geotechmcal and Foundation Engineering Design and Construction", by Robert W Day, 1999 5 "1997 Uniform Building Code, Volume 2, Structural Engineering Design Provisions", Published by International Conference of Building Officials 6 "Maps of Known Active Fault Near-Source Zones m California and Adjacent Portions of Nevada to be used with 1997 Uniform Building Code", Published by International Conference of Building Officials 7 "Geologic Maps of the Northwestern Part of San Diego County, California", Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology, by Siang S Tan and Michael P Kennedy, 1996 8 "Bearing Capacity of Soils. Technical Engineering and Design Guides as Adapted from the US Army Corps of Engineers, No 7", Published by ASCE Press, 1994 9 "Foundations and Earth Structures, Design Manual 72", by Department of Navy Naval Facilities Engineering Command, May 1982, Revalidated by Change 1 September 1986 12 City of Ca r Isba^d Building Department CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE PAYMENT OF SCHOOL FEES OR OTHER MITIGATION This form must be completed by the City, the applicant, and the appropriate school districts and returned to the City prior to issuing a building permit The City will not issue any building permit without a completed school fee form Project Name Building Permit Plan Check Number Project Address APN Project Applicant (Owner Name) Project Description Building Type Residential SCHLESINGER RESIDENCE CB081615 2430 BUENA VISTA CR 155 223 03 00 NANCY SCHLESINGER NEW 2ND DWELLING 1 New Dwelling Units Square Feet of Living Area in New Dwelling Second Dwelling Unit 640 Square Feet of Living Area in SDU Residential Additions Commercial/Industrial City Certification of Applicant Information Net Square Feet New Area Square Feet Floor Area ^Date 10/29/2008 SCHOOL DISTRICTS WITHIN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD Carlsbad Unified School District 6225 El Cammo Real Carlsbad CA 92009 (331-5000) Vista Unified School District 1234 Arcadia Drive Vista CA 92083 (726-2170) San Marcos Unified School District 215MataWay San Marcos, CA 92069 (290-2649) Contact Nancy Dolce (By Appt Only) Encmitas Union School District 101 South Rancho Sanla Fe Rd Encmitas, CA 92024 (944-4300 ext 166) San Dieguito Union High School District 710 Encmitas Blvd Encmitas, CA 92024 (753-6491) Certification of Applicant/Owners The person executing this declaration ("Owner") certifies under penalty of perjury that (1) the information provided above is correct and true to the best of the Owner's knowledge, and that the Owner will file an amended certification of payment and pay the additional fee if Owner requests an increase in the number of dwelling units or square footage after the building permit is issued or if the initial determination of units or square footage is found to be incorrect, and that (2) the Owner is the owner/developer of the above described project(s), or that the person executing this declaration is authorized to sign on behalf of the Owner Signature Revised 3/30/2006 Date SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL FEE CERTIFICATION (To be completed by the school distnct(s))***************************************************************************** THIS FORM INDICATES THAT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROJECT HAVE BEEN OR WILL BE SATISFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT The undersigned, being duly authorized by the applicable School District, certifies that the developer, builder, or owner has satisfied the obligation for school facilities This is to certify that the applicant listed on page 1 has paid all amounts or completed other applicable school mitigation determined by the School District The City may issue building permits for this project SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICIAL WALTER FREEMANTITLE ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT CARLSBAD UNIFIED SQIOOLD1 NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT 6225 ELCAMINO REAL CARLSBAD, CA 92009 DATE PHONE NUMBER "7090- Revised 3/30/2006 ] CARLSBAD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT \ \ JEFFERSON ELEMENTARY \ \ AVIAFtA OAKS ELEMENTARY | | CARLSBAD HIGH SCHOOL \ \ MAGNOLIA ELEMENTARY \ \ AVIARA OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL | | CARLSBAD VILLAGE ACADEMY \ \ CALAVERA HILLS SCHOOL \ \ PACIFIC RIM P "3 Tl R 9 | | VALLEY MIDDLE SCHOOL [ | KELLEY SCHOOL \ \ CALAVERA HILLS MIDDLE SCHOOL | | BUENA VISTA SCHOOL \ | HOPE SCHOOL | | OTHER RECEIVED FROM (If Applicable) PARENT OF PAYMENT FOR ?O i V\_C C> 155 ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE ll)lb AMOUNT RECEIVED BY ^ V^iA.'v HASH CHECK*TOTAL INSULATION CERTIFICATE THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT INSULATION HAS BEEN INSTALLED IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CURRENT ENERGY REGULATIONS, CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATION CODE, TITLE 24, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, IN THE BUILDING LOCATED AT- SITE ADDRESS 2430 BUENA VISTA CIRCLE CARLSBAD CA NUMBER STREET CITY STATE CEILING OVER LIVING AREAS - NEW AND EXPOSED EXISTING / GARAGE CEILING WITH LIVING SPACE ABOVE FLOOR OVER LOWER BATH AND LAUNDRY BATTS- MANUFACTURER GUARDIAN THICKNESS 91)2" R-VALUE .R30 N/A N/A EXTERIOR WALLS TO LIVING AREAS - NEW AND EXPOSING BATTS: MANUFACTURER GUARDIAN THICKNESS 3 5/8" R/VALUE R13 N/A N/A EXTERIOR WALLS TO LIVING AREAS . NEW AND EXPOSED EXISTING BATTS. MANUFACTURER GUARDIAN THICKNESS 2X6 WALL BETWEEN THE HOUSE AND GARAGE WALL BETWEEN UNITS BY STAIRWELL BATTS MANUFACTURER GUARDIAN AIR INFILTRATION- 3 5/8" R/VALUE R13K N/A N/A THICKNESS 12"R/VALUE R19 N/A N/A (TITLE 24) YES XXXXXXXXXX NO OTHER: GENERAL CONTRACTOR RANDY WILKERSON BY- JIM YE TITLE DATE N CONTRACTOR: AMERICAN INSULATION. INC (L, LICENSE # 855615 TITLE AUTH. AGENT DATE 8/3/2009