The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2434 BADAJOZ PL; B; CB962319; PermitBUILDING PERMIT Permit No: CB962319 07/22/98 16: 35 Project No: A9603311 Page 1 of 1 Development No: Job Address: 2434 BADAJOZ PL Suite: Permit Type: RESIDENTAL ADD/ALT Parcel No: 216-190-56-00 Lot#: Valuation: 60,018 Construction Type: VN Occupancy Group: Reference#: Status: ISSUED Description: 645 SF SECOND STORY ADDITION Appl ied : 12/06/9 6 : 168 SF GARAGE ADDITION 61 925 SF REMODEL Apr/Issue: 01/15/97 Entered By: MDP Appl/Ownr : STEPHANS, ERIC 619 727-0063 1500 SHADOWRIDGE DRIVE #140 VISTA, CA. 92083 *** Fees Required *** *** Fees Collected & Credits *** Adjustments : .oo Total Credits: .oo ............................ ............................................ Fees : 878.00 Total Fees: 878.00 Total Payments: 878.00 Balance Due: .oo Fee description Units Fee/Unit Ext fee Data Building Permit 464.00 Plan Check 302.00 Strong Motion Fee 6.00 * BUILDING TOTAL 772 00 Enter @@Y@* for Plumbing Issue Fee > 20.00 Y Each Plumbing Fixture or Trap > 28.00 Each Install/Repair Water Line > 7.00 Enter @IY@@ for Electric Issue Fee > 10.00 Y Enter @vY@@ for Remodel > 10.00 Y Enter 'Y' for Mechanical Issue Fee> 15.00 Y Install Furn/Ducts/Heat Pumps > 9.00 Each Exhaust Fan > 6.50 4 7.00 1 7.00 1 9.00 1 6.50 IN CLEARANCE PERh$T APPLICATION City of Carlsbad Building Department 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, U 92009 (619) 438-1161 From List 1 (see back) give code of Permit-Type: For Residential Proiects Only: From List 2 (see back) give ......................................................... Code of Structure-Type: Net Loss/Gain of Dwelling Units 2. PRQIECIINFORMA7TON FOR OFFICE USE ONLY U Nearest Cross Street 5-A- Ar(_LL LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot No. Subdivision NamdNumber Unit No. Phase No. 0 2 Energy Calcs ASSESSORSPARCEL Zjb 14 cb :%. ._ EMSnNGUsE &S+&C&,L PROPOSEDUSE 0 2 Structural Calcs 0 2 Soils Report 0 1 Addressed Envelope -- DESCRIPTION OF WORK 2+& soy cL\&8fyD6 I J- #OFSTORIES z #OFBEDROOMS 1 #OFBATHROOMS I {if clitferent from applicantJ sQ.Fr. c= NAME (last name first) ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE DAY TEIEPHONE NAME (last name first) UA-H 07mmR &\-L ADDRESS mb %d STATE LIC. # LICENSE CLASS & CITY BUSINESS LIC. # SOLA Lr&L - tb7 (last name first) Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby atfirm that 1 have a certificate of consent to selt-insure issued by the Director ot Industnal Relations, or a certificate of Workers' Compensation Insurance by an admitted insurer, or an exact copy or duplicate thereof certified by the Director of the insurer thereof filed with the Building Inspection Department (Section 3800, Lab. C). INSURANCE COMPANY POLICY NO. EXPIRATION DATE Certiticate ot Exemption: I certily that in the pertormance ot the work tor which this permit IS issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. SIGNATURE DATE Owner-Builder Ueclarauon: I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractors Ucense law tor the tollowing reason: 0 I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale.). I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). I am exempt under Section (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish, or repair any StIUcture, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (Chapter 9, commencing with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars [$500]). 0 0 Business and Professions Code for this reason: SIGNATURE DATE cop NON-1 Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? IF ANY OF THEANSWEflS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE rssUn, AFIERJUL.Y 1,1989 UNLESS THE APPUCANT HAS MET OR IS MEEIWG THE RJQ- OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR FOLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. I hereby attirm that there IS a construction lending agency tor the pertormance ot the work tor which this permit IS sued (Sec 3097 Ti) Ciwl code). 0 YES 0 NO 0 YES 0 NO 0 YES 0 NO LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS I certity that I have read the applicatlon and state that the above intormation is correct. I agree to comply with all Uty ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the City of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I AIS0 AGREETO SAVE INDEMNlFYANDKEEPHARMLESTHEClTYOFcARlsBADAGAIN~Au.IIABILITIEs, JUlChfENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINSI' SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMlT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over SO" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. Expiration. Every permit issued by the Building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenc ithin 365 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandon ork is commenced for a period of 180 days (Section 303(d) Uniform Building Code DATE: 12-4,-4 t any time aft WHITE/ YELLOW Applicant PINK: Finance APPLICANTS SIGNATURE A,& 8 - CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT# CB962319 FOR 07/21/98 INSPECTOR AREA PD DESCRIPTION: 645 SF SECOND STORY ADDITION PLANCK# CB962319 TYPE: RAD CONSTR. TYPE VN JOB ADDRESS: 2434 BADAJOZ PL STE : LOT: APPLICANT: STEPHANS, ERIC PHONE: 619 727-0063 CONTRACTOR: OWNER: REMARKS: B/436-7816 INSPECT0 SPECIAL INSTRUCT: 168 SF GARAGE ADDITION & 925 SF REMODEL OCC GRP TOTAL TIME: CD LVL DESCRIPTION 19 ST Final Structural 29 PL Final Plumbing 39 EL Final Electrical 49 ME Final Mechanical ACT COMMENTS DATE 071798 050598 090597 090597 090397 080597 072397 061997 061397 061297 061097 031997 031997 031297 011797 011797 ***** INSPECTION DESCRIPTION ACT Final Combo co Final Combo co Exterior Lath/Drywall AP Interior Lath/Drywall AP Interior Lath/Drywall co Rough Combo AP Frame/Steel/Bol ting/Welding CO Shear Panels/HD8s AP Shear Panels/HD8s CA Roof/Reroof AP Roof/Reroof AP Roof/Reroof NR Underground/Under Floor AP Ftg/Foundation/Piers AP Shear Panels/HD's co Shear Panels/HD's co HISTORY ***** INSP COMMENTS PD 1:lO PM NO ONE HOME PD PD PD PD PD PD PD PD PD PD PD PD PD PD PD SEE NOTICE NDS REVISIONS NOT READY AT 9:15 CITY OF CARLSBAD * N OTIC E 'xii BUILDING DEPARTMENT 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE [ I I TIME I ,-! f FEE DUE? YES $4 PHONE @ BUILDI6G INSPECT& CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER ,- CITY OF CARLSBAD ** NOTICE 438-3550 BUILDING DEPARTMENT 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE /T DATE 3- 4 7 TIME LOCATION -/b 7- ~- ION CALL 438-3101. RE-INSPECTION FEE DUE? 0 YES PHONE INFORMATION, CONTACT @ BUILDING INSPECTOR CODE ENFORCEMENTOFFICER L CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT# CB962319 FOR 07/22/97 INSPECTOR AREA PD DESCRIPTION: 645 SF SECOND STORY ADDITION PLANCK# CB962319 TYPE: RAD CONSTR. TYPE VN APPLICANT: STEPHANS, ERIC PHONE: 619 727-0063 168 SF GARAGE ADDITION 61 925 SF REMODEL OCC GRP JOB ADDRESS: 2434 BADAJOZ PL STE : LOT: CONTRACTOR: OWNER: REMARKS: C/ERIC/984-5352 INSPECT0 SPECIAL INSTRUCT: TOTAL TIME: CD LVL DESCRIPTION ACT COMMENTS 14 ST Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding & -- -- -- ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE 061997 061397 061297 061097 031997 031997 031297 011797 011797 DESCRIPTION Shear Panels/HD's Shear Panels/HD's Shear Panels/HD's Shear Panels/HD's Roof/Reroof Roof/Reroof Roof/Reroof Ftg/Foundation/Piers Underground/Under Floor ACT INSP COMMENTS AP PD CO PD SEE NOTICE CA PD CO PD NDS REVISIONS AP PD AP PD NR PD NOT READY AT 9:15 AP PD AP PD CITY OF CARLSBAD NOTICE 438-3550 BUILDING DEPARTMENT 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE 7-23-93 - - DATE TIME I PHONE 1 @ CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER CITY OF CARLSBAD 1- NOTICE ?.A 4 3 8 - 3 5 5 0 BUILDING DEPARTMENT 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE ~-~~ FEE DUE? YES PHONE CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST 1. PERMIT# CB962319 FOR 03/19/97 INSPECTOR AREA PD DESCRIPTION: 645 SF SECOND STORY ADDITION PLANCK# CB962319 TYPE: RAD CONSTR. TYPE VN JOB ADDRESS: 2434 BADAJOZ PL STE : LOT: APPLICANT: STEPHANS, ERIC PHONE: 619 727-0063 CONTRACTOR: PHONE : OWNER: PHONE : 168 SF GARAGE ADDITION & 925 SF REMODEL OCC GRP REMARKS: BJN/ERIC/984-5352 INSPECTOR SPECIAL INSTRUCT: TOTAL TIME: CD LVL DESCRIPTION 15 ST Roof/Reroof ACT COMMENTS ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION ACT INSP COMMENTS 0 3 12 9 7 Roof /Reroof NR PD NOT READY AT 9: 15 011797 Ftg/Foundation/Piers AP PD 011797 Underground/Under Floor AP PD CITY C’ OF CARLSBAD *- NOTICE 438-3550 BUILDING DEPARTMENT 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE TIME LOCATION 2 0 2 PERMIT NO. I t FOR INSPI$CTION CALL 438-3101. RE-INSPECTION FEE DUE? 0 YES PHONE BUILDING INSPECrOR CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER EsGil Corporation DATE: January 14, 1997 JURIS D I CTI 0 N : Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 96-2319 0 APPLICANT JUKIS. 2 u PLAN REVIEWER a FILE SET: I1 PROJECT ADDRESS: 2434 Badajoz St. PROJECT NAME: Blackburn Kamuzi SFD Addition and Remodel 0 The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply H The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction’s building codes with the jurisdiction’s ---- codes. when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff 0 The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. 0 The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. 0 The applicant’s copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant’s copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. 0 Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: 1 Fax #: H REMARKS: Provide a smoke detector at the Foyer Ceiling . Mail Telephone Fax In Person By: Sergio bela Enclosures: Esgil Corporation GA fl CM EJ 0 PC 01 /I 3 tmsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 SanDiego, California 92123 + (619) 560-1468 + Fax (619) 560-1576 EsGII Corporatlon DATE: December 17, 1996 JURIS Dl CTI ON: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 96-2319 PROJECT ADDRESS: 2434 Badajoz St. 0 FIRE 0 PLAN REVIEWER 0 FILE SET: I PROJECT NAME: Blackburn Kazumi SFD Addition & Remodel 0 El The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction’s ***- codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction’s *- codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. u The applicant’s copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant’s copy of the check list has been sent to: Stephens Eric 1500 Shadowridge Dr. # 140, Vista, CA 92083 0 0 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: REMARKS: Date contacted: (by: ) By: Sergio Azuela Enclosures: Esgil Corporation 0 GA 0 CM 0 EJ PC 12/10 Telephone #: trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 6 San Diego, California 92123 + (619) 560-1468 6 Fax (619) 560-1576 * Carlsbad 96-2319 December 17, 1996 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES , PLAN CHECK NO.: 96-2319 JURISDICTION : Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 2434 Badajoz St. FLOOR AREA: 645 SF SFD Addition STORIES: 2 168 SF Garage Addition 925 SF SFD Remodel HEIGHT: 24 FT REMARKS: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: 12/6/96 ESGIL CORPORATION: 12/10 DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED: December 17, 1996 DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY PLAN REVIEWER: Sergio Azuela FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Present California law mandates that residential construction comply with Title 24 and the following model codes: 1994 UBC (effective 12/28/95), 1994 UPC (effective 12/28/95), 1994 UMC (effective 2/23/96) and 1993 NEC (effective 12/28/95). The above regulations apply to residential construction, regardless of the code editions adopted by ordinance. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1994 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copv) where each correction item has been addressed, Le., plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. LIST NO. 1, GENERAL SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES WITHOUT SUPPLEMENTS (1994 UBC) r3forw.dot * Carlsbad 96-2319 December 17, 1996 0 PLANS 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commerciaVindustria1 projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92009, (619) 438-1 161. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (619) 560-1 468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil 0 FIRE PROTECTION I ocations of permanently wired smoke detectors with battery backup: When sleeping rooms are upstairs, at the upper level in close proximity to the stair. In rooms adjacent to hallways serving bedrooms, when such rooms have a ceiling height 24 inches or more above the ceiling height in the hallway. Show it on plans at Foyer. NOTE: Detectors shall sound an alarm audible in Section 31 0.9.1. sleeping areas of the unit. 3. When the valuation of a room addition or repair exceeds $1,000, or when sleeping rooms are created, smoke detectors shall be provided per the above, except that smoke detectors added at existing construction need only be battery powered. Section 31 0.9.1.2. 0 GENERAL RESIDENTIAL REQUIREMENTS 4. Sleeping rooms shall have a window or exterior door for emergency escape. Sill height shall not exceed 44" above the floor. Windows must have an openable area of at least 5.7 square feet with the minimum openable width 20" and the minimum openable height 24". The emergency door or window shall be openable from the inside to provide a full, clear opening without the use of separate tools. Section 31 0.4. Show on plans that the existing 4030 window at the South elevation on the exterior wall of the bedroom adjacent to the Garage shall provide the minimum 20" width of openable area. Carlsbad 96-2319 December 17, 1996 5. Provide mechanical ventilation capable of providing five air changes per hour in bathrooms, water closet compartments, laundry rooms and similar rooms if required openable windows are not provided. Section 1203.3. Show it on plans for bathroom adjacent to Party wall. 0 EXITS, STAIRWAYS, AND RAILINGS 6. Guardrails (Section 509.1): a) b) Shall be detailed showing adequacy of connections to resist the horizontal force prescribed in Table 16-B. Openings between railings shall be less than 4". The triangular openings formed by the riser, tread and bottom element of a guardrail at a stair shall be less than 6". 7. Provide stairway and landing details. Sections 1006.3, 1006.15 and 1006.2. a) Maximum rise is 7" and minimum run is 11". When the stairs serves less than 10 occupants, or serves an unoccupied roof, rise may be 8" maximum and run 9" minimum. 8. Handrails: a) All stairs shall have handrails terminating in a newel or safety post. Section 1006.9. 9. The handgrip portion of all handrails shall be not less than 1-1/4 inches nor more than 2 inches in cross-sectional dimension. Handrails projecting from walls shall have at least 1-1/2 inches between the wall and the handrail. Section 1006.9. ROOFING IO. Show attic ventilation. Minimum vent area is 1/150 of attic area (or 1/300 of attic area if at least 50% of the required vent is at least 3 feet above eave vents or cornice vents). Show area required and area provided. Section 1505.3. 11. Note on the plans: corrosion-resistant metal mesh with mesh openings of 1 /4-inch in dimension." Section 1505.3. "Attic ventilation openings shall be covered with - Carlsbad 96-2319 December 17, 1996 0 FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Provide a copy of the project soil report prepared by a California licensed architect or civil engineer. The report shall include foundation design recommendations based on the engineer's findings and shall comply with UBC Section 1804. As required by the City of Carlsbad. Per soils report, note on the plan the soils classification, whether or not the soil is expansive and note the allowable bearing value. Section 1804.3. 0 FRAMING Show location of attic access with a minimum size of 22"x30", unless the maximum vertical headroom height in the attic is less than 30. Access must be provided to each separated attic area, shall be located in a hallway or other readily accessible location and 30" headroom clearance is required above the opening. Section 1505.1. 0 PLUMBING (UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE) Provide adequate barrier to protect water heater (in the new location) from vehicle damage. An 18" platform for the water heater does not satisfy this requirement. UPC, Section 51 0.3. Show T and P valve on water heater and show route of discharge line to exterior. UPC, Section 608.5. Show that water heater is adequately braced to resist seismic forces. Provide two straps (one strap at top 1/3 of the tank and one strap at bottom 1/3 of the tank). UPC, Section 510.0 Provide a note on the plans: In showers and tub-shower combinations, control valves must be pressure balanced or thermostatic mixing valves. UPC Section 41 0.7 New water closets and associated flushometer valves, if any, shall use no more than 1.6 gallons per flush and shall meet performance standards established by the American National Standards Institute Standard AI 12.19.2. H & S Code, Section 17921.3(b). MISCELLANEOUS Provide positive connection between the new and the existing framing. Carlsbad 96-2319 December 17, 1996 To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, Le., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. 0 Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: Yes 0 No P The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 921 23; telephone number of 61 91560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Sergio Azuela at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. * Carlsbad 96-2319 December 17, 1996 BUILDING PORTION Dwellina Addition VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE BUILDING AREA VALUATION VALUE (ft.2) MULTl PLI ER ($) 645 78.00 50.31 0 JURIS D I CTI 0 N: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 96-2319 Garage Addition Dwelling Remodel PREPARED BY: Sergio hela DATE: December 17, 1996 168 22.00 3,696 925 6.25 (see comments) 6,012 BUILDING ADDRESS: 2434 Badajoz St. SFD Addition & Remodel Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers. TOTAL VALUE BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R3-U1 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN 60,OI 8 I I H 1991 UBC Building Permit Fee 1991 UBC Plan Check Fee 0 Bldg. Permit Fee by ordinance: $ 464.00 0 Plan Check Fee by ordinance: $ 301.60 Type of Review: Complete Review 0 Structural Only 0 Hourly 0 Repetitive Fee Applicable 0 Other: Esgil Plan Review Fee: $ 241.28 Comments: $26.00/4 = $6.25 Fire Services Review: 0 Complete Review 0 Suppression System 0 Fire Alarm 0 Other: ....................................................................................................................... Esgil Fire Services Review Fee: Comments: Sheet1 of 1 macvalue.doc 51 96 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST BUILDING ADDRESS: PROJECT DESCRlPTl DENIAL The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to build. 0 A Right-of-way permit is required prior to construction of the following improvements: codes and standards. Submit corrected plans andlor specifications to this office for review. I\ - By: Date: I AlTACHM ENTS 0 Dedication Application ENGINEERING DEPT. CONTACT PERSON 0 Dedication Checklist 0 Improvement Application 0 Improvement Checklist Name: Michele Masterson City of Carlsbad 0 Future Improvement Agreement Address: 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 0 Grading Permit Application 0 Grading Submittal Checklist 0 Right-of-way Permit Application 0 Right-of-way Permit Submittal Checklist and Information Sheet Phone: (619) 438-1 161, ext. 4315 u Sewer Fee Information Sheet A-4 ~P~~l~~ RndrdrcHd m1 Falnwll.dos w.wm 2075 Las Palmas Dr. - Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 - (619) 438-1161 - FAX (619) 438-0894 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST ,- SITE PUN lST7 2ND' 3RD' VQ 0 1. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: A. NorthArrow d. B. Existing & Proposed Structuresr E. /Easements C. Existing Street Improvements D. "Property Lines &-PP Easements F. Xght-of-Way Width & Adjacent Streets 2. Show on site plan: %& A. Drainage Patterns B. Existing & Proposed Slopes C. Existing Topography 0 3. Include note: "Surface water to be directed away from the building foundation at a 2% gradient for no less than 5' or 2/3 the distance to the property line (whichever is less).* [Per 1985 UBC 2907(d)5] On graded sites, the top of any exterior foundation shall extend above the elevation of the street gutter at point of discharge or the inlet of an approved drainage device a minimum of 12 inches plus two percent." [Per 1990 UBC 2907(d)5] 4. Include on title sheet: A. Site address B. Assessor's Parcel Number C. Legal Description For commercialhndustrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, include: total building square footage with the square footage for each different use, existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing, warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved. EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION Page 1 of 4 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE 5. Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of approval 0 for Project No. I’ Conditions were complied with by: Date: DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS 6. Dedication for all street Rights-of-way adjacent to the building site and any storm drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and for remodels with a value at or exceeding $ * pursuant to Code Section 18.40.030. Q Dedication required as follows: Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8 K x 11” plat map and submit with a title report. All easement documents must be approved and signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process. Provide the completed application form and the requirements on the checklist at the time of resubmittal. Dedication completed by: Date: IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS CI P 0 7a. All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the construction exceeds $ , pursuant to Code Section 18.40.040. Public improvements required as follows: Please have a registered Civil Engineer prepare appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements on the attached checklist for a separate plancheck process through the Engineering Department. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of permit. Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public improvement requirements. Provide the completed application form and the requirements on the checklist at the time of resubmittal. Improvement Plans signed by: Date: Page 2 of 4 G.UIBRARYIEMi\WORDIWCS\CHKLmBjl6np - Cldd Epmol Fmn LM Os RN. mim APN: - 14: - J-LCO N- '- I -_ (If property in, complete SPECIAL TAX CALCULATION WORKSHEET provided by Building n.2Z x Department.) iE%JtNa p p p Leqend 555 5 E E Item Complete hHh Item Incomplete - Needs your action Environmental Review Required: YES - NO - AYPE DATE OF COMPLETION: Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval 0 / / do 0 Discretionary Action Required: YES NO /TYPE APPROVAL/RESO. NO. DATE PROJECT NO. OTHER RELATED CASES: Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval do n Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance / Project site located in Coastal Zone? YES - NO J/ If NO, proceed with checklist; if YES, proceed below. Determine status (Exempt or Coastal Permit Required): If Exempt, proceed with checklist; if Coastal Permit required, hold building permit until Coastal Permit issued. Coastal Permit Determination Form already completed? YES NO If NO, complete Coastal Permit Determination Form now. Coastal Permit Determination Log #: Follow-Up Actions: 1) Stamp Building Plans as "Exempt" or "Coastal Permit Required" (at minimum Floor Plans). 2) Complete Coastal Permit Determination Log as needed. do 0 tin o /' 0 0 lnclusionary Housing Fee required: YES NO J/ (Effective date of lnclusionary Housing Ordinance - May 21, 1993.) Site Plan: 1. Provide a fully dimensional site plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way width, dimensional setbacks and existing topographical lines. 2. Provide legal description of property and assessor's parcel number. Zoning: 1. Setbacks: Front: Int. Side: Street Side: Rear: 2. Lot Coverage: 3. Height: 20' 8' Required Required Required /a ' Required /h ' Required Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Required 3s'' Shown zv' OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER -% DATE 1 c- ?& $2 C0-d.d SdL YLvJ SIGNATURE TO BE A WET SEAL, NOT A COPY . . . PROJECT NAME: BLMKBOFhl PROJECT NO.: 460a DATE: Mlzd 1946 3 Load Summary 1994 UBC chapter 16 Project Name : Blackburn Residence Project number: 96057 Date : 07-NOV-96 time: 05:33 PM .................................................................. Dead Loads exterior walls 0.875 I' stucco 10.00 psf 0.5 gyp. bd. 2.00 psf 3.5 'I framing at 16 1.75 psf 15 # felt 0.15 psf 3.5 batt insul 0.60 psf total load 14.5 psf ................................ Live Loads I Live Loads Wind Loads Earthquake interior walls I roof roof floor floor 3.5 'I framing at 16 1.75 psf 0.5 'I gyp. bd. 2.00 psf 0.5 gyp. bd. 2.00 psf 0 batt insul 0.00 psf conc roof tile 7.25 framing at 0.5 plywood 0.5 gyp. bd. 7.5 batt insul 30 # felt 5.80 psf 24 2.90 psf 1.50 psf 0.30 psf 1.35 psf 2.00 psf ---------____ total load 13.9 psf 4 : 12 slope 16 psf ------- total L.L. + D.L. 30 psf 9.25 framing at 24 3.70 psf 0.75 plywood 2.25 psf total load 8.0 psf residential 40 psf total L.L. + D.L. 48 psf 0.5 gyp. bd. 2.00 psf ------------------______________ ------- P = Ce Cq qs I Method 2 Cq 1.30 wind speed 70mph qs 12.60 psf P= Ce = 0.62 0-15' abv grnd 10.16 psf Ce = 0.67 15-20' abv grnd 10.97 psf Ce = 0.72 20-25' abv grnd 11.79 psf Ce = 0.76 25-30' abv grnd 12.45 psf exposure = B importance factor I 1.00 ................................ V = Z I C/RW * W Zone 4 Z 0 -40 coefficient C 2.75 coefficient Rw 6.0 lateral force V 0.183 W importance factor I 1.00 .............................. Soil Bearing Pressure 1000 psf PROJECT NAME: BMGwO)Bh) Re, PROJECT NO.: %s57 DATE: 1( /m-/ h46 SHEET NO.: 2 PROJECT NAME: SLpLkl3UZN PROJECT NO.: qho5-7 DATE: I\ /Z5 /I946 SHEET NO.: 3 PROJECT NAME: 3LACC3uR1\1 PROJECT NO.: 46 057 DATE: I\ /26/1446 SHEET NO.: 4- / 'PI ! pl- I PROJECT NAME: ~LAGk2WtFh) PROJECT NO.: 9605-7 DATE: I1 /ZF/ (cr96 et SHEET NO.: 5 PROJECT NAME: 3'-kEBf)t)9!d PROJECT NO.: 9 6057 DATE: 1 I /25/46 (5 SHEET NO.: '22' t- 26' 3 PROJECT NAME: BLh%3ued DATE: I[ /Z6/1446 PROJECT NO.: 965 57 SHEET NO.: 7 PROJECT NAME: BLACKEL) Fhl PROJECT NO.: q6067 DATE: II /Z&/% SHEET NO.: 4 PROJECT NAME: BLAc~~~ehl PROJECT NO.: 760tS7 DATE: I) ,/25/46 16 et SHEET NO.: PROJECT NAME: 8l-A cKgued PROJECT NO.: 46057 DATE: I1 /% / 144& SHEET NO.: II PROJECT NAME: ~L~c~~~ pd PROJECT NO.: 76057 DATE: \I /2E/\996 SHEET NO.: I2 Lo d m - a w e 0 z 6 II a' m m m m m V 8 v, 3 I- v, 0 I- n - - X X X I w -1 3 Q w I u cr) Z 3 0 a _1 C I 4 a I jx CROTH en ARCHITECTS PROJECT NO. ?,&~57 DATE: 6-1 0 -97 E.N. + EW 3x4 CONT. PLYWD SHEAR EXSTG FLOOR SHEATHING I/ 1 r EXSTG BLKG A35'S PER /- S.P. SCHEDULE EXST= 2x TOP DzL A35F VERT AT 6" OC 'ICAL 4,i-i -EXSTG P.T. SILL +EXSTG CONC. + NEW SHEAR PANEL DETAIL 1 - 1 /2" = I'-O" PROJECT 96057 DATE 6-10-1997 REVISED SHEET 101 CIVIL. GEOTECHNICAL. 6 QUALITY ENGINEERING FOUNDATION DESIGN LAND SURVEYING SOIL TESTING CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 6 INSPECTION CLIENT: BLACKBURN PROJECT: BLAC-FOUND DATE: 9 JAN. 1997 KAZUMI BLACKBURN C/O Eric Stephens Construction 1500 Shadowridge Drive, #140 Vista, CA. 92083 Attention: Mr. Eric Stephens Subject: Soils Engineer Certification for the project located at 2434 Badajoz Street, Carlsbad, CA. (Lot 162 of La Costa South, Unit 1) Gentlemen: Pursuant to the City of Carlsbad requirements, this letter will serve as confirmation that the foundation plans and specifications have been reviewed for the subject project. have determined that the recommendations in the Preliminary Soils Investigation by Benton Engineering, Inc. dated March 8, 1968, and our Soils Update Letter dated January 7, 1997, have been properly incorporated into the construction documents. We Sincerely, rthur C. Beard RCE RQE RGE Chief Engineer 161 I-A SO. MELROSE DRlVE #285, VISTA, CA 92083 619-945-3150 FAX: 619-945-4221 CIVIL. GEOTECHNICAL. 6 QUALITY ENGINEERING FOUNDATION DESIGN *LAND SURVEYING SOIL TESTING CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 6 INSPECTION CLIENT: BLACKBURN PROJECT: BLA 1296 U DATE: 7 JAN. 1997 KAZUMI BLACKBURN C/O Eric Stephens Construction 1500 Shadowridge Drive, #140 Vista, CA. 92083 Attention: Mr. Eric Stephens Subject: Soil Update letter for the proposed Residential Addition located at 2434 Badajoz Street, Carlsbad, CA. (Lot 162 of La Costa South, Unit 1) Reference (a): Preliminary Soils Investigation by Benton Engineering, Inc. dated March 8, 1968. Gentlemen: Pursuant to your request, we have completed our site inspection of the subject parcel and review of Reference (a). On December 16, 1996, a representative from our firm visited the site in order to evaluate the general surface soil conditions relative to the proposed construction. The proposed development consists of the construction of a wood framed, stucco type room enlargement and second story addition to the existing residential structure located on the northeast corner of Badajoz Place and Sacada Circle, Carlsbad. The site topography consists of relatively flat lot with an existing single story duplex. Some minor grasses and a few small shrubs and trees exist around the outside perimeter of the structure. -1- 16 1 1 -A SO. MEL ROSE DRIVE #285, VISTA, CA 92083 6 19-945-3 150 FAX: 6 19-945-422 1 CIVIL. GEOTECHNICAL, 6 OUALITY ENGINEERING FOUNDATION DESIGN LAND SURVEYING SOIL TESTING CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 6 INSPECTION On December 16, 1996, a representative from our firm obtained soil samples of the underlying native materials and returned to our laboratory for detailed testing. Based on our field inspections, laboratory test results, and our review of Reference (a), the following conclusions and recommendations are presented and are to be utilized in conjunction with the Building Plans: The general overall surface soil conditions do not appear to have changed significantly since the original grading and construction on the subject parcel. According to Reference (a), this lot appears to be in the area of proposed excavation making it an all cut lot. The native materials encountered at the site consist of a light tan silty fine sand and are considered suitable to support the proposed room enlargements and two story addition. For foundation design purposes, the following earth pressures were calculated based on the shear test results from Reference (a). Shear Test: Cohesion = 860 psf; Angle of Friction = 22.5'. Allowable Bearing Value = 2880 psf Equivalent Fluid Pressure = 54 psf Passive Lateral Resistance 269 psf Active Pressure = 54 psf Coefficient of Friction = 0.35 It is recommended that the continuous perimeter foundations and concrete slabs for a light weight structure shall be reinforced in accordance with the Structural Engineer's design -2- 161 l-A SO. MELROSE DRIVE #285, VISTA, CA 92083 619-945-3150 FAX: 619-945-4221 .- CIVIL. GEOTECHNICAL, 6 QUALITY ENGINEERING FOUNDATION DESIGN LAND SURVEYING SOIL TESTING CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 6 INSPECTION based on the above earth pressures and for the expected live and dead loads, and for wind and seismic loads. Findings of this Report are valid as of this date; however, changes in conditions of a property can occur with the passage of time whether they be due to natural process or works of man on this or adjacent properties. In addition, changes in applicable or appropriate standards occur whether they result from legislation or broadening of knowledge. Accordingly, findings of this report may be invalidated wholly or partially by changes outside our control. Therefore, this report is subject to review and should not be relied upon after a period of one year. The Soil Engineer has prepared this Report for the exclusive use of the client and authorized agents. This Report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted soil and foundation engineering practices. No other warranties either expressed or implied are made as to the professional advice provided under the terms of this agreement, and included in this Report. Since we will be the Soils Engineer for this project, we will be providing inspection during construction in order to ensure compliance with this report and the City of Carlsbad Requirements. B & B Engineering Inc. and Associates appreciate this opportunity to be of service. Should you have any questions regarding this project, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, A'rthur C. Beard RCE RQE RGE -3- 161 1-A SO. MELROSE DRIVE #285, VISTA, CA 92083 619-945-3150 FAX: 619-945-4221 PHILIP HENKING BENTON PRCSIOINT - CIVIL LNGINLER BENTON ENGINEERING, INC. APPLIED SOIL MECHANICS - FOUNDATIONS 6741 EL CAJON BOULEVARD SAN DIEGO. CALIFORNIA 92115 March 8, 1968 SAN DILGO: 503-5654 LA MESA: 469-5654 Rancho La Costa, Inc. Route 1 Box 2550 En cin i tas Cat i fom ia Proiect No. 68-2-2C La Costa South Unit No. 1 Gst of the Intersection ot La Costa Avenue and El Camino Real San Diego County, California ..I, Sub iec t : iminay Soi Is jpvestiga tion IbB-loA Gentlemen : CONCLUS IO '.IS It is concluded from the field investigation and laboratory tests results that: *: 1. Generally the existing natural soils which are to receive fill and/or one and two story residential dwellings are suitable for the safe support of the proposed loads. Low- ever, the results of field density tests taken in alluvial soils existing in certain drainage channels and low areas indicate that these upper soils are relatively soft or loose and would be considered unsuitable for the support of the proposed filled ground and dwellings. It is recommended that these soft or loose soils be removed under the direction of he soils engineer and the compacted filled ground placed on suitable supporting natural soils. Any loose or soft natural soils existing in shallow cut areas should also be removed and replaced with filled ground uniformly compacted to at least 90 percent of maximum dry density. 2. Calculations, based on the results of the shear tests performed on undisturbed natural soils determined to be suitable for structural support, give a safe allowable bearing 'pressure of at of 1 foot below per square foot for one foot wide footings founded at a depth natural ground surface. 3. It is concluded from the results of the load-consolidation tests that the settle- ment of a one foot wide continuous footing loaded to 2000 pounds per square foot and founded on suitable firm natural soils is estimated to be less than 118 inch. sandy --- . _L SlOlO .17.85 4. clay ._ I It soils is concluded encountered from the results of the expansion tests that the silty clay and on the site would be considered !o have sufficient expansion . Pso ject Vo . h8-2-2C La Costa South Unit No. 1 potential to require special design of foundations and slabs. pletion of grading an inspection should be made of each lot to determine whether "expansive" soils exist in the upper 3 feet below fininshed grade. Where expansive soils exist for thick- nesses enough to cause adverse differential movements,then special recommendations will be presented for the construction of houses on these "expansive" soils. Conventional type foot- ings may be used where nonexpansive soils exist in the upper 3 feet below finished grade. It may be desirable to specify and provide for this condition during grading. Either during or upon com- 5. All of the soils may be satisfactorily compacted in the fill areas and, when compacted to at least 90 percent of maximum dry density, have a safe bearing capacity of 1510 pounds per square foot for one foot wide footings placed 1 foot below he compacted ground surface. The settlement of a one foot wide continuous footing placed on fill soils uniformly compacted to PO percent of maximum dry density is estimated to be on he order of l/i3 inch. It is recommended that all soft or loose soils existing in proposed compacted filled ground areas be removed as required by the sotls engineer and the compacted filled ground be placed on firm natural soils. Based on the results of the field investigation and laboratory tests the depths of this required removal would be 1.2, 4.5, 6.0 and 5.5 feet, respectively, at Pits 1, 2, 3 and 4. I Recommendations for the placement of filled ground are presented in the attached "Standard Specifications for Placement of Compacted Filled Ground, I' Appendix AA. 6. A. Preliminary plans indicate that cuts on the order of 50 to 60 feet in height are to be made on the south side of La Costa Avenue in the general vicinity of Eorings 3, 4 and 5. It is concluded from the field investigation and the test data that these cub be made no steeper than a slope ratio of 2 horizontal to 1 vertical. Relatively shallow cuts are indicated on the lot areas and these may be excavated on a 1 112 horizontal to 1 vertical for heights not to exceed 20 feet. b. The fill soils, when uniformly compacted to at least 90 percent of maximum dry density in accordance with he approved specifications, will be stable with an adequate factor of safety when constructed on a 1 1/2 horizontal to I vertical slope. The maximum heights of fill slopes are estimated to be approximately 33 to 37 feet. If any soil types are encountered during the grading operation that were not tested in this investigation, additional laboratory tests will be conducted in order to determine their physical characteristics, and supplemental reports and recommendations wi II automatically become a part of the specifications. The data presented on the attached pages are a part of this report. Respec tfu I I y subm i tted , BE!\ITOr\l ENGINEERING, INC. Reviewed by By -2eP &"- Dish: (4) Addressee ,- --> R. C. Remer (2) Mclntire 8 Quiros, inc. Attention: Mr. Gary Cumbey BENTON ENGINEERING. INL. ( 1) Rick Engineering Project No. 68-2-2C La Costa South Unit No. 1 -3 - h'iarch 9, 1963 DISCUSS1 ON A preliminary soils investigation has been completed on the proposed La Costa South Unit No. 1 located east of the intersection of La Costa Avenue and El Camino Real in >an Diego County, California. The objectives of the investigation were to determine the existing soil conditions and physical properties of the soils in order that engineering recommendations could be made for the grading and construction of houses on this unit. In order to accomplish these obiectives, three borings were drilled with a truck-mounted drill rig and seven pits were excavated using a backhoe, field density tests were taken, undisturbed and loose bag samples were obtained, and laboratory tests were performed on these samples. - The site is located on the south side of the valley extending easterly from the Batiquitos Lagoon northeast of Encinitas, California. The southerly portion of the site may be described as gently rolling terrain while much of the north portion is located on the steep sloping sides of the valley. Much of the upper land has been cultivated. The upper soils in the valley and lower slope areas in the north portion of the site are described by the U .S. Department of Agriculture as Alviso loam and h'uerhuero fine sandy loam. The maior soil types encountered in the exploration borings and pits were silty sand, clayey sand, sandy clay, and silty clay. Fie Id lnves t ina t i on Three borings, Numbers 3, 4 and 5, were drilled with a truck-mounted rotary bucket-type drill rig and seven exploration pits were excavated using a backhoe. The borings were drilled during the same period as Borings 1 and 2 on La Costa Avenue between El Camino Real and La Costa South Unit No. 1. The approximate locations of the borings and pits on La Costa South Unit No. 1 are shown on the attached Drawing No. 1, entitled "Location of Test Borings and Exploration Pits." The borings were drilled to depths of 46 to 51 feet below the existing ground surface and the depths of the exploration pits varied from 4 to 15.5 feet. A continuous log of the soils encountered was recorded at the time of excavation and is shown in detail on Drawing Nos. 2 to 10, inclusive, each entitled "Summary Sheet. I' The soils were visually classified by field identification procedures in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification Chart, A simplified description of this classification system is presented in the attached Appendix A at the end of this report. Undisturbed samples were obtained in the borings at frequent intervals in the soils ahead of the drilling. The drop weight used for driving the sampling tube into the soils was the ''Kelly" bur of the drill rig which weighs 1623 pounds, and the average drop was 12 inches. The general procedures used in field sampling are described under "Sampling 'I in Appendix B . In-place field density tests were token in Exploration Pits 1, 2, 3 and 4, using the sand dis- placement method, in order to evaluate the suitability of the soils in these areas for the support of filled ground. BLNTON ENGINEERING. INC. Roject No. 68-2-2C La Costa South Unit No. 1 -4- March 8, 1968 Laboratory Tests Laboratory tests were performed on all undisturbed samples of the soils in order to determine the dry density and moisture content. The results of these tests are presented on Drawing Nos. 2 to 10, inclusive. Consolidation tests were performed on representative samples in order to determine the load-settlement characteristics of the soils. The results of these tests are presented on Drawing Nos. 11 and 12, each entitled "Consolidation Curves." In addition to the above laboratory tests, expansion tests were performed on some of the clayey soils encountered to determine their volumetric change characteristics with change in moisture content. The recorded expansions of the samples are presented as follows: Son Diego County Method Percent Expansion Under Percent Expansion Undl Depth of Unit Load of 144 Pounds Unit Load of 500 Pounc Boring Sample Sample, Soil per Square Foot from Opti- per Square Foot from No. No. in Feet Description mum Moisture to Saturation Air Dry to Saturation 3 7 35 .O-35.5 Silty clay 4 4 15 3-16 .O Silty clay 4 6 25 3-26 .O Clayey fine sand 5 6 20.0-20.5 Silty clay 3 Bag 1 2.0- 3.0 Siltyclay 7.30 Pit 5 Bag 1 1 .O- 2 .O Fine to medium 6.12 Pit5 Bag 2 4.0- 5.0 Silty clay 5.90 sandy clay 6.19 7.23 1.27 7.15 Direct shear tests were performed on saturated and drained samples in order to determine the minimum angle of internal friction and apparent cohesion of the soils. The results of these tests are presented in the following tabulation: Angle of Normal Shearing Internal Apparcn t Load in Resistance Friction Cohesion kips/sq ft Kip/sq ft Degrees Ib/sq ft Boring 3, Sample 7 0.5 1.26 2c 1000 Depth: 35 .O-35.5 feet 2 .o 2.06 Boring 4, Sample 8 0.5 1.55 Depth: 35.5-36 .O feet 1 .o 2.69 2 .o 5.07 i Boring 4, Sample 11 0.5 1 .os Depth: 50.5-51 .O feet 1 .o 2.24 2 .o 3.22 i Indicates reduced value. 40" 40" 400 370 BLNTON ENGINEERING. INC. Project No. 68-2-2C La Costa South Unit No. 1 -5- March 8, 1968 Angle of In temal Friction Deg rees Normal Load in kips/q ft Shearing Res is tan ce Kips/sq ft Apparent Cohesion Ib/sq ft Boring 5, Sample 5 Depth: 15.5-16.0 feet 22.5 0.5 1 ,o 2 .o 1.07 1.45 1.69 860 Boring 5, Sample 11 Depth: 40.5-41 .O feet 40* 400* 0.5 1 .o 2.0 . 2.65 3.34 5.45 Boring 3, Bag Sample 2** Depth: 6.0-7.0 feet 0.5 1 .o 2 .o 17.5 660 0.82 1.08 1.30 Boring 5, Bag Sample 1** Depth : 38.0-39 , 0 feet 0.5 1 .o 2 .o 0.59 1.02 1.69 36 250 Pit 5, Bag Sample 2** Depth: 4.0-5 .O feet 0.5 1 .o 2 .o 2.76 2.34 3.14 14 1 ooo* Pit 6, Bag Sample 4** Depth: 9.0-10.0 feet 0.5 1 .o 2 .o 0.43 33.3 100 0.92 1.41 Indicates reduced value. ** Indicates test sample compacted to 90 percent of maximum dry density. The general procedures used for the preceding laboratory tests are described briefly in Appendix B . Compaction tests were performed on representative samples of the soils to establish compaction criteria. The soi Is were tested according to a modi fled A .S . T .M . D 1557-58T mehod of compaction which uses 25 blows of a 10 pound hammer dropping 18 inches on each of 5 layers in a 4 inch diameter 1/30 cubic foot mold. The results of the tests are presented as follows: Maximum Optimum Mois- Boring Bag Depth Soi I Dry Density ture Content No. Sample in Feet Der cr i p t i on Ib/cu ft % dry wt 3 1 2.0- 3.0 Silty clay 114.8 14.1 3 2 6.0- 7.0 Silty clay 110.6 15.7 4 1 4.0- 5.0 Silty fine sand 116 .O 13.2 5 1 38.0-39.0 Silty fine sand 119 .O 12 .o Continued on page six. BENTON ENGINEERING. It.<. Project No. 68-2-2C La Cmtu South Unit No. 1 4- March 6, IY6d Pit No. 1 2 3 4 5 5 6 6 &rg Sample 1 2 1 1, 1 2 2 4 Depth in Feet 2 .o-2.5 4.0-4.5 2 .O-2.5 2 .o-2.5 1 .o-2 .o 4.0-5 ,O 1 .o-2 .o 9.0-10.0 soi I Description Maxi mum Dry Density Ib/cu ft Silty clay 118.0 Clayey fine to medium 128 .O Clayey fine to medium 131.8 Fine to medium sandy clay 125.0 Silty clay 118.8 Si I ty fins sand 103.6 Silty fine sand 113.0 Fine sandy clay 120.2 sand sand Optimum Mois- ture Content % dry wt 13.6 12.2 8.4 7.4 10.5 12.1 15.5 13.2 Atterberg Limit tests were performed on a representative sample of the silty clay soil in accordance with A .S .T.M. D 423-61T and D 424-59. The results of these tests are presented a5 follom: Boring Sample Depth Liquid Plasticity Group No. No. in Feet Soil Description Limit Index Symbol 5 5 15 516 .O silty clay 58.7 32.6 CH Unconfined compression tests were performed on representative samples of the silty clay soils and the results are presented below: Boring No. 3, 5 5 Sample No. Cohos i on Ib/q ft Depth I ( 1/2 Unconfined in Feet Compressivg Strength) 10 40.5-41 .O 7 20.5-2 1 .O 13 45.5-46.0 1380 670 4650 Using the lower values of internal angle of friction and apparent cohesion, and the Terzaghi Formula for local shear failuro,the safe allowable bearing pressures for the soils are deter- mined as follows: . Local Shear Formula: Q'=~/~cN',+~ DfN'q+yBN'y Assumptions : (1) Continuous footing 1 foot wide 2B (2) Depth of footing 1 foot =: Df Continued on page seven BENTON ENGINEERING. INC. Roiect No. 68-2-2C La Costa South Unit No. Undisturbed natural soils -7 - 1 c = 860lb/sq ft March 8, 1968 y = 120 Ib/cu ft N', = 13.5 Nfq = 6.0 Nly= 3.3 Q8=(2/3x860x 13.3+ 120x lx6.0+ 120~0.5~3.3)=8,66OIb/rq ft Q' Safe = Q'+ 3 (Factor of Safety) = 2,880 Ib/sq ft Fill soils compacted to 90% of maximum dry density 0 = 33" c = 100 Ib/sq ft y 120 Ib/cu ft N'c 21.5 NIq = 12.0 N'r = 7.5 Q ' = (2/3 x 100 x 2 1.5 + 120 x 1 x 12.0 + 120 x 0.5 x 7.5) = 3323 Ib/q ft Q' Safe = Q'+ 2.2 (Factor of Safety) = 1510 Ib/sq ft i i I 1 1 1 1 I I I I I BINTON ENGINEERING. INC. BLACKBURN RESIDENCE ADDITION La Costa Climate Zone #7 Glenn Groth, Architect Compliance Method - MICROPAS December 5, 1996 Haynal and Company 425 W. 5th' Ste. 201 Escondido, CA 92025 (619) 743-5408 /531-1122 Contractor's License #649028 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE CITY OF CARLSBAD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 2075 LAS PALMAS DR., CARLSBAD, CA 92009 Plan Check No.m ?& /y (61 9) 438-1 161 This form shall be used to determine the amount of school fees for a project and to verify that the project applicant has complied with the school fee requirements. No building permits for the projects shall be issued until the certification is signed by the appropriate school district and returned to the City of Car lsbad Bu i Id i ng Department. SCHOOL DISTRICT: Carlsbad Unified 801 Pine Avenue San Marcos Unified 1290 West San Marcos Blvd. Carlsbad CA 92009 (434-066 1 ) San Marcos CA 92024 (7444776) Encinitas Union 101 South Rancho Santa Fe Rd. ,)( San Dieguito Union High School 71 0 Encinitas Boulevard Encinitas CA 92024 (9444300) Encinitas CA 92024 (753-6491) 49 Project Applicant: <4)-c~,f r-1 I 'Bf fie lrgu w APN:~!/~: -17 - .5~% &* YLi.4 y -/ Project Address: 2934 B Pfi J-Cs ?L ~~hRl-'~Wh~ -1 hovLm RES I DENT I A L: SQ. FT. of living area &@ numbm%g units / SQ. FT. of covered area SQ. FT. of garage area Date I /fd?7 / FEE CERTIFICATION (To be completed by the School District) Applicant has complied with fee requirement under Government Code 53080 Project is subject to an existing fee agreement Project is exempt from Government Code 53080 Final Map approval and construction started before September 1, 1986. (other school fees paid) Other Residential Fee Levied: $ .b3d S/Kbased on 0 $44- sq. ft. @ t9,,Y Comdlndust Fee Levied: $ based on sq. ft. @