HomeMy WebLinkAbout2441 PIO PICO DR; ; CB012019; Permit11-05-2001
Job-Address:
Permit Type:
Parcel No:
Valuation:
OccupancyGroup:
# Dwelling Units:
Bedrooms:
Project Title:
City of Carlsbad
1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008
Residential Permit Permit No:CB012019
Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725
2441 PlO PICO DR CBAD
RESDNTL Sub Type: SFD Status: ISSUED
1563511800 Lot #: 0 Applied: 06/11/2001
$298,101.00 Construction Type: VN Entered By: JM
Reference #: Plan Approved: 10/22/2001
1 Structure Type: SFD Issued: 11/05/2001
4 Bathrooms: 3 Inspect Area:
BERGMAN - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDE Orig PC#:
SFD 3216 SF, GAR 780 SF, DK 220 SF Plan Check#:
Applicant:
CHINN JAMES
2120 JUMMY DAURANTE
DEL MAR CA 92014
858-755-5863
Owner:
0 Q [ 3729 11/05/01 0002 01 02 (, \ COP 2
Total Fees: $24,709.99
/
ç ,taIPayments To Date: $753.66 '-- Balance Due: $23,956.33
I.
UdivOdOX1I / -
Building Permit f /$1,159.48"% "Meter Size / /
AddI Building Permit Fee / $0.001 f AddI Recl.Water.Con.Fee \ $0.00
Plan Check / / $753.66 ; PMeter Fee \ \ \$140.00
AddI Plan Check Fee / $0.O0 ( SDCWA Fee, , \ $2,004.00
Plan Check Discount $0.00 j/ CFDPayoff Fee "< \ \ $0.00
Strong Motion Fee . >$29:'81 - FF\, A1W -- $5,425.44
Park in Lieu Fee -/ $0.O0$ (CFDjund) ! i" $5,008.10
Park Fee UI $0.00 ''License Tax J $0.00
LFM Fee ,,- \ (C Fund)) $0.00
Bridge Fee 7 \ A:,5$0'00'7--
$0.00--c-Traffic Inpact Feé\ / $441.80
Other Bridge Fee \ \' Traffic Impact (C-FD Fund) L.J) J$498.20
BTD #2 Fee \ çS \ $0.00 jt Sidewalk Fee / (J / $0.00
BTD #3 Fee \ ç' \ $o.00 PLUMBING TOTAL' '--j / $182.00
Renewal Fee \ \$0.00 ELECTRICAL TOTALS / $70.00
AddI Renewal Fee \ ( ç\. $0.00 MECHANICALTOTAL / $63.50,
Other Building Fee \ i"-)")$0.00 - Housing Impact'Fei"\"\ / $0.00
Pot. Water Con. Fee. \ J'26,400.00 Housing InLieuFèe)) / $4,515.00
Meter Size 5/8 J Y' TJMaster Drainage"Fee' / $0.00
AddI Pot. Water Con. Fee 'N. $0.00 \ 2,,' SewërFee 2) , $2,019.00
Red. Water Con. Fee $0.00 J Additional Fees _/ $0.00
TOTAL PERMIT FEES $24,709.99
FINAL APPROVAL
Inspector: H Date: t\[ Clearance:
NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "Imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively
referred to as "fees/exactions." You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must
follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for
processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack,
review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition.
You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capactiy
changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project. NOR DOES IT APPLY to any
fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired.
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
~E=M TAPPLICATION PLAN CHECK NO/?iT/2d/T
CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT EST. VAL.
1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008 . 'p
Plan~Ck. Deposit
Validated By
75/3
Date
c-o c--
Address lincl #)
~ Business Nag t this add 8 061/01 0002 01 02 S CPO
Legal Descr' ti Lot No. Subdivision Name/Number Unit N . : Phase Na. Total # of units yAcçc
Assessor's Parcel # Existing Use Poposeif Use 2. sp-i 16
Description of (Work SQ p
,
fS5 # of Bdrooms # of throoms
[2 9_0i ~54R_67t —policant) RR
JA"i. 4jJ .
Name Address . City State/Zip Telphone # Fix #
PUCA ZacTr DAgen Down rx f -
I Ms -i z O - 2i (a
Name Address City State/Zip r e
r4pRopERTY OWNER i7'7 11J eLI-, 4 '?z
Name -. Address City State/Zip Telephone #
P1 IR 4PAYNAJIE - -
(Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its
issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law
[Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Codel,or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged
exemption. Any violation of Section 031.5 by an applicant for a permit sub ts the applicant to a civil pe it of not more than five hundred dollars'[$5001).
Name , ,, Address / City - State/Zip , Telephone #
State License # / 1' 7/ License Class —/ City Business License #
Designer Name - Address City State/Zip ,Telèphone
State License #
[6W9K 3QrjJ *
Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations:
0 I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance
Vof tje work for which this permit is issued. -
I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is
issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are:
Insurance Company i/47_- 7d4.-1 /iz.d'olicy No. "? 3' Expiration Date
(THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS [$1001 OR LESS)
CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as
to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. -
WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred
thousand dollars ($110 .in addition to Cos compensation, damages a rovided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees.
SIGNATUR DATE.
WttA111 -
hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason:
I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale
(Sac, 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner 'of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does
such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the-building or improvement is
sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose Of sale).
I, as owner of the property'; am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The
Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of propertywho builds or improves thereon,and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed
pursuant to the Contractor's License Law).
0 I am exempt under Section - Business and Professions Code for this reason:
I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed Iiioperty improvement. 0 YES DNO
I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the propdsed work.
I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number):
, I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone
number / contractors license number):
I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted )hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type
of work):
-PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE DATE
IS]RES LV
Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention
program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? 0 YES 0 NO
Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? 0 YES 0 NO
Is the facility to be constructed within i000 feet of the Outer boundary of a school site? 0 YES 0 NO
IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED' UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE
REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT.
-- .- --_ -- - - - e --
I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for theperforrnance of the work for which this permit is issued )Sec. 3097(i) Civil Code).
LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS - -
(L..iA&JJCANT CERTIFICIIQN - '
' ' '
I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all
City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the Cit' of Carlsbad to' enter., upon the above mentioned
property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES,
JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT.
OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0" deep and demolition or construction of Structures over 3: stories in height. -
EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the building Official 9Elerthe pjqvisions of this Code shall expire by-limitation and become null and void 'if the building or work
authorized by such permit is ot mmenced within 180 da tro the/e of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned
,at any time after the work is om 4ç geod of 1 0 day' (Sqf'o Q6.4.4 Uniform Building Code).
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE SIGNATURE '>V411' uu ( . DATE c:• /& /Of o
WHITE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance
0 MONNA, City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request
For: 11/26/2002 LJ
Permit# CB012019
Title: BERGMAN - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDE
Description: SFD 3216 SF, GAR 780 SF, DK 220 SF
Type: RESDNTL Sub Type: SFD
Job Address: 2441 PlO PICO DR
Suite: Lot 0
Location:
APPLICANT CHINN JAMES
Owner:
Remarks:
Inspector Assignment: PY
Phone: 7608013274
Inspector:
Total Time: Requested By: RON
Entered By: CHRISTINE
CD Description ct Comments
19 Final Structural bo o cyi,.-, j4-t_ti.
29 Final Plumbing
39 Final Electrical ____________________
IV
____________________________________
49 Final Mechanical
Associated PCRs/CVs
Date
09/03/2002
08/08/2002
08/08/2002
08/08/2002
08/07/2002
07/29/2002
07/23/2002
06/28/2002
05/31/2002
05/31/2002
05/30/2002
05/30/2002
05/29/2002
05/23/2002
05/23/2002
05/22/2002
Inspection History
Description Act lnsp Comments
34 Rough Electric WC PY
17 Interior Lath/Drywall AP PY
18 Exterior Lath/Drywall AP PY
23 Gas/Test/Repairs AP PY
18 Exterior Lath/Drywall NS PY
16 Insulation AP JE OK TO DRYWALL
84 Rough Combo AP PY SEE LIST ATTCH.
13 Shear Panels/HD's AP PY
14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding AP PY
15 Roof/Reroof AP PY
14 Frame/Steel/BoltinglWe!ding NR PY
15 Roof/Reroof NR PY NEED LADDER & TRUSS CALCS
14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding NS JC ROLLOVER TO 5-30
14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding WC PY
15 Roof/Reroof NR PY NO ONE ON JOB
14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding NS PY
City of Carlsbad
Final Building Inspection
Dept: Building geing Planning CMWD St Lite Fire
ECE
NOV 2=1 2002
CITY OF CARLSBAD
JNIDEPARTMENT
Plan Check #: Date: 11/20/2002
Permit #: CB012019 Permit Type: RESDNTL
Project Name: BERGMAN - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDE Sub Type: SFD
SFD 3216 SF, GAR 780 SF, DK 220 SF
Address: 2441 PlO PICO DR Lot: 0
Contact Person: Phone:
Sewer Dist: CA Water Dist: CA
Inspected
By: .l4-ii
Date
DA!t S Inspected: /2 2- Approved: - Disapproved:
Inspected Date
By: Inspected: Approved: Disapproved:
Inspected Date
By: Inspected: Approved: Disapproved:
Comments:
02/18/2002 14:02 8587558186 DESIGN BUILD PARTNER PAGE 01/81
t. -t
James A. Chinn, Architect
r,t1
-
. ,
0•
.- M ; I
2120 Jimmy Durante Blvd., Suite 117
Del Mar, CA 92014
Phone (858) 755-5863
Fax (858) 755-8186
Email :jimdesignbuUdinccom
L1r
LI
William E. Billings
Licensed Surveyor
P.O. Box 4231, Carlsbad, California 92018-4231
(760) 434-6442
January 2, 2002
City of Carlsbad
Building' Department
1635 Faraday Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Subject:' Building Setback Certification
Site Addresi:; 241+1 Pio Pico Drive
APN:; 156-351-18
Legal: Parcel 2, Minor Sub. 98-12 (PM 18560)
Rüilder:, Severino Construction "
Plan Check No.: C3L012019, approved Nov. 5, '2001
On January 2, 2002, I checked the foundation forms
at: 2+1 Plo Pico Drive for setback compliance. I
found the corners of Parcel 2, Parcel Map 18560.
I certify that the forms meet or exceed the minimum
setbacks shown on the plans.
The setbacks as measured are:
Location Measured Measured
Required
Front, North yard 25.0' 20.0'
Side, East yard 8.1 8.0' , Side, West yard 13.2' 8.0'
Rear, South yard 41.0' ' 16.0'
William E. Billings
,/-
/
I -
z5S i 7'>-s -3c -
\
TECHNOLOGY
.
;r -
bert7nP.E.
Addressee
oESS
CD
io,
UJ No. C-24613
Exp.12/31/O1 1*
ALLIED EARTH TECHNOLOGY
P.O.BOX 1932 • EL CAJON, CALIFORNIA 92022-1932
ROBERT CHAN, RE. TELEPHONE(619)447-4747
July 25, 2001
James A. Chinn, Architect.
2120 Jimmy Durante Boulevard #!7
Del Mar, CA. 92014
Subject: Project No. 00-1106E4
Review of Foundation Plan
Proposed Residential Building Site
2445 Pio Pico Drive
Carlsbad, California
Dear Mr:Cliinn
The undersigned has reviewed the foundation plans for the proposed residential building
to be constructed on subject property, more specifically referred to as being- Assessor's
Parcel No. 156-351-12, in the City of Carlsbad, State of California. - -
Based on a review of the above plans, it has been determined that the foundation
recommendations as presented in our "Soil Investigation Report" for subject property,
same project number as above, dated September 1, 2000,. have been properly
incorporated into the plans.
su
RAN? - MOP
11
ALLIED EARTH TECHNOLOGY
P.O.BOX 1932 • EL CAJON, CALIFORNIA- 92022-1932
ROBERT CHAN, BE. TELEPHONE(619)447-4747
November 26, 2001
Mrs. Natalie Nelms
2445 Pio Pico Drive.
Carlsbad, CA. 92008-1040
Subject: Project No. 00-1 106E4
Report of Compacted Filled Ground
Proposed Residential Building Site
2445 Pio Pico Drive
Carlsbad, California
Dear Mrs. Nelms :
This report records. our observations of the grading and the results of tests performed in
connection with our inspection of the compaction of fill soils placed on certain areas of
the proposed residential building site on subject property, more specifically referred to as
being Assesor's Parcel No. 156-351-12, in the City of Carlsbad, State of California.
The grading reported hereinwas accomplished during the period between November 10
and 23, 2001, inclusive.
Prior to grading, the site was cleared and grubbed. Existing loose upper soils to a
maximum depth of 3 feet within 5 feet outside the foundation line of the proposed
structure were removed. The bottom of the excavation was inspected and then scarified
to a depth of 6 inches. The removed soils were properly moistened, and uniformly
compacted in lifts on the order of 6 to 8 inches.
The depths of fill at which the tests were taken and the final test results are presented on
page T-1, under "Table of Test Results". The laboratory determinations of the maximum
dry density and optimum moisture content of the fill soils are set forth On page L-1
under "Laboratory Test Results". The approximate location of the compacted
filled ground and field density tests are presented on Figure No. 1, entitled, "Approximate
Location of Compacted Filled Ground".
Project No. 00-1 106E4 Mrs. Natalie Nelms 11/26/01 Page 2
2445 Pio Pico Drive
The results of the tests and observations indicate that the fill soils placed and tested have
been compacted to at least 90 percent of maximum dry density. Test results indicate
that the building pad is adequate for its intended use as support to the proposed
residential structure.
It is recommended that a safe allowable soil bearing value of 1,500 pounds per square
foot be used for the design of the foundation for the proposed residential structure.
The soils encountered on the site possess low expansion potential (Expansion Index =
35).
It is recommended that all continuous footings for the proposed residential structure be a
minimum of 12 inches in width, and extend at least 12,inches (for single-story) below the
lowest adjacent ground surface. All continuous footings should be reinforced with two
#5 rebars, one rebar located near the top, and the other rebar near the bottom of the
footings. Isolated pier footings should be a minimum of 24 inches square and embedded
at least 12 inches below the lowest adjacent final grade. The isolated pier footings should
be reinforced with two #5 rebars in both directions, located near the bottom of the
footings.
Any concrete slab should be 4 inches net in thickness, and be reinforced with #3 rebars @
18 inches on center, placed at mid-height of the concrete slab. The concrete slab should
be underlain by a minimum, of 4 inches of clean sand and a moisture barrier in moisture
sensitive areas.
Proper control of the site drainage and regular maintenance of all drainage facilities are
important factors related to the overall stability of the soil mass. Surface water should
drain into the street or into on-site drainage structures without intermediate ponding.
Should you have any questions regarding the contents of this report, please feel free to
contact our office at your convenience. This opportunity to be of service is sincerely
appreciated.
Pages L-1, T-1, and Figure No. 1 are parts of this report.
ALLIEE E H TECHNOLOGY OFE
han, RE cc No. 2461 \
\ Exp. 12/31,O
Project No. 00-1106E4 Mrs. Natalie Nelms. 11/26//01 Page L-1
2445 !io Pico Drive
LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
The maximum dry density and optimum moisture content of the backfill base
material, as determined in accordance with A.S.T.M. D1557-91, Method A, are
presented as follows
Maximum Optimum
Soil Soil Dry Density Moisture Content
Type Description (lbs./cu.ft.) (% Dry Wt.)
Brown silty fine sand 125.0 11.5
The Expansion Index of the most clayey soils was determined in accordance with
UBC Test No. 18-2. The results of the test are presented as follows:
Soil ISoil Expansion
Type Description Index
I Brown silty fine sand 35 *
* Considered to possess low expansion potential
I
Project No. 00-1 106E4 Mrs. Natalie Nelms 11/26/01 Page T-1
2445 Pi Pico Drive
TABLE OF TEST RESULTS
Depth
of Fill Field Dry Maximum Date
Test Soil at Test Moisture Density Dry Density Percent of
No. Type (Ft.) (% Dry Wt.) (lbs./cu.ft.)(lbs./cu.ft) Compaction Test
I 1 +2.0 12.4 116.8 125.0 93.5 11/21/01
2 1 + 3•0* 12.9 113.4 125.0 90.7 11/23/01
3 1 + 3.0* 12.7 113.6 125.0 90.9 11/23/01
4 1 +2.5* 11.9 116.5 125.0 93.2 11/23/01
5 1 +2.5* 10.2 115.7 125.0 92.6 11/23/01
* Finished grade
I
419f A'OA7/1/177J LLZO7/O4! OF
f/LW 17[/V/1--r 7T
LX4 riO/V Or COuP/IC TEL? /LLCO 6IfOUMP
t7LL/A7 47 / f'AWTCT /Y2 i21 //i26 [zZ
EsGil Corporation
In Partnership with government for Buifihing Safety
DATE: October 19, 2001
JURISDICTION: Carlsbad
PLAN CHECK NO.: 01-2019
PROJECT ADDRESS: 2443 Plo Pico Dr.
PROJECT NAME:-'I Residence
SET: III
O APPLICANT
' PLAN REVIEWER
0 FILE
EJ The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply
with the jurisdiction's building codes.
The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes
when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff.
The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list
and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck.
' The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil
Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck.
LI 'The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the .jurisdiction to forward to the applicant
ntact person.
The applicant's copy of the check list has been. sent to:
Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
E Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
contacted: . Telephone #:
ted: (by: ) Fax #:
eijione Fax In PersorYL
a
K . he submitted "Soils,J€tter" must reflect appropriate APN# to properly identify
w APN#'s are sho%'on soils letter)
Eliza Enclosures: --
Esgil Corporation
0 GA 0 MB 0 EJ 0 PC 1/15/01 trnsmti.dot
9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576
EsGil Corporation
In Partnership with government for Bui&Iing Safety
DATE: September 7, 2001
JURISDICTION: Carlsbad
PLAN CHECK NO.: 01-2019
PROJECT ADDRESS: 244$ Plo Pico Dr.
PROJECT NAME: Nelms Residence
SET: II
O APPLICANT
U PLAN REVIEWER
o FILE
LII The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply
with the jurisdiction's building codes.
The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes
when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff.
E The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list
and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck.
The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil
Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck.
The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant
contact person.
The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to:
James Chinn
2120 Jimmy Durante Blvd. Ste 117, Del Mar, CA. 92014
Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
Person contacted: James Chinn Telephone #: 858-755-5863
Date contacted:19-1-o' (by:t.c&y) Fax #:5S-755-/&
Mail .- Telephone Fax i.-' In Person
1111 REMARKS:
By: Bill Elizarraras Enclosures:
Esgil Corporation
LIGA MB DEJ F-1 PC 8/27/01 trnsmtl.dot
9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 •. (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576
J
Carlsbad 01-2019 II
September 7, 2001
RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST
JURISDICTION: Carlsbad
PROJECT ADDRESS: 2443 Pio Pico Dr.
DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY
ESGIL CORPORATION: 8/27/01
REVIEWED BY: Bill Elizarraras
PLAN CHECK NO.: 01-2019
SET: H
DATE RECHECK COMPLETED:
September 7, 2001
FOREWORD (PLEASE READ):
This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code,
Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws
regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is
based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections
based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department
or other departments.
The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied
before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3,
1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any
state, county or city law.
Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints to:
THE JURISDICTION'S BUILDING DEPARTMENT.
To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon
which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the
revised plans.
The following items have, not been resolved from the previous plan reviews. The original
correction number has been given for your reference. In case you did not keep a copy of
the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding
corrections. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items.
Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of
corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where
they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list?
IJYes ONo
Carlsbad 01-2019 II
September 7, 2001
. PLANS
Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the
correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two
sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets
can be submitted in one of two ways:
Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of
Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA, 92008, (760)
602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad
Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments.
Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation,
9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468.
Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of
Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire
Departments.
NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be
reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by
EsGil Corporation is complete.
. CONCRETE AND MASONRY
8. Provide fireplace construction details or attach fireplace standard drawing.
Chapter 31. No response
. FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS
10. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan,
grading plan and specifications have been-reviewed and'that it has been
determined that the recommendations in the soils report are properly
incorporated into the construction documents (required by the soil report). The
submitted soils letter must address the project with correct address and
APN#.
. ENERGY CONSERVATION
19. The window schedule shall clearly describe the required 'U-factor and solar heat
gain coefficient (SHGC) values and demonstrate compliance with the Title 24
energy calculations. Not specified on plans
. MISCELLANEOUS
To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item
has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc.
The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake
Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to
perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan
review items, please contact Bill Elizarraras at Esgil Corporation. Thank you.
EsGil Corporation
in Partnership with Government for fBui&Iing Safety'
DATE: June 27, 2001
JURISDICTION: Carlsbad
PLAN CHECK NO.: 01-2019
PROJECT ADDRESS: 2443 Pio Pico Dr.
PROJECT NAME: Nelms Residence
SET:I
O APPLICANT
REVIEWER
U FILE
The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply
with the jurisdiction's building codes.
The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes
when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff.
The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list
and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck.
The check list transmitted herewith is for your information., The plans are being held at Esgil
Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck.
E The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant
contact person.
The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to:
James Chin
2120 Jimmy Durante Blvd. Ste 117, Del Mar, CA. 92014
El Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
Person contacted: James Chin Telephone #: 858-755-5863
Date contacted: ' 2-1-0 (by:.L.,,) Fax #:
Mail ..- Telephone Fax .- In Person
El REMARKS:
By: Bill Elizarraras Enclosures:
Esgil Corporation
DGA [I MB OEJ Pc 6/12/01 trnsmtLdot
9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576
Carlsbad 01-2019
June 27, 2001
PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST
SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES
PLAN CHECK NO.: 01-2019 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad
PROJECT ADDRESS: 2443 Pio Pico Dr.
FLOOR AREA: 3216 sqft. Dwelling STORIES: 2
780 sqft. Garage
220 sqft. deck HEIGHT: 28'
DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY
JURISDICTION:
DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW
COMPLETED: June 27, 2001
FOREWORD (PLEASE READ):
DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY
ESGIL CORPORATION: 6/12/01
PLAN REVIEWER: Bill Elizarraras
This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code,
Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws
regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review
is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections
based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire
Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to
the issuance of a building permit.
Present California law mandates that residential construction comply with the 1998 edition of
the California Building Code (Title 24), which adopts the following model codes: 1997 UBC,
1997 UPC, 1997 UMC and 1996 NEC (all effective 7/1/99).
The above regulations applyto residential construction, regardless of the code editions adopted
by ordinance.
The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied
before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3,
1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any
state, county or city law.
To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each
correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet number, specification section, etc.
Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans.
Carlsbad 01-2019
June 27, 2001
. PLANS
Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the
correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two
sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets
can be submitted in one of two ways:
Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of
Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760)
602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad
Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments.
Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation,
9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468.
Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of
Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire
Departments.
NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be
reviewed by. the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by
EsGil Corporation is complete.
2. Plans, specifications and calculations shall be signed and sealed by the
California State licensed engineer or architect responsible for their preparation,
for plans deviating from conventional wood frame construction. Specify
expiration date of license. (California Business and Professions Code).
. FIRE PROTECTION
Show locations of permanently wired smoke detectors with battery backup:
a) On each story.
NOTE: Detectors shall sound an alarm audible in all sleeping areas of the unit.
Section 310.9.1.
. GENERAL RESIDENTIAL REQUIREMENTS
Glazing in the following locations should be of safety glazing material in
accordance with Section 2406.4 (see exceptions):
a) Fixed or operable panels adjacent to a door where the nearest exposed
edge of the glazing is within a 24-inch arc of either vertical edge of the door
in a closed position and where the bottom exposed edge of the glazing is
less than 60 inches above the walking surface. @ Living Room to Laundry
exterior door.
. STAIRWAYS
Provide stairway and landing details. Sections 1003.3.3.
a) Provide structural details.
Carlsbad 01-2019
June 27, 2001
. GARAGE
Garage requires one-hour fire protection on the garage side of walls and ceiling
common to the dwelling. Table 3-B, Section 302.4.
All elements supporting floor above garage, including walls/beams/columns
supporting floor joists, must have one-hour fire-resistive protection on the garage
side. Section 302.2.
. CONCRETE AND MASONRY
Provide fireplace construction details or attach fireplace standard drawing.
Chapter 31.
. FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS
The soils engineer recommended that he/she review the foundation excavations.
Note on the foundation plan that "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building
Department foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the building
official in writing that:
a) The foundation excavations, the soils expansive characteristics and
bearing capacity conform to the soils report."
Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan,
grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been
determined that the recommendations in the soils report are properly
incorporated into the construction documents (required by the soil report).
. FRAMING
Specify plywood grade and panel span rating. Table 23-11-E-1.
Clarify roof framing over upper bedroom adjacent to stairwells. Provide truss
design or show cony, framing.
Provide support for winding stairwell at first floor.
. MECHANICAL (UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE)
Note that passageway to the attic furnace shall be unobstructed not less than
30" high and 30" wide and have continuous solid flooring not less than 24 inches
wide, not more than 20 feet in length through the attic. Section 307.3.2, UMC.
Carlsbad 01-2019
June 27, 2001
Specify on the plans the following information for the fireplace(s), per Section
106.3.3:
a) Note on the plans that approved spark arrestors shall be installed on all
chimneys. UBC, Section 3102.3.8.
. ELECTRICAL (NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE)
Note on the plans that receptacle outlet locations will comply with NEC Art.
210-52(a).
. PLUMBING (UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE)
In the garage, provide an adequate barrier to protect water heater from vehicle
damage. An 18" platform for the water heater does not satisfy this requirement.
UPC, Section 510.3.
. ENERGY CONSERVATION
The requirements for the prescriptive package components have been updated
as of June 1, 2001. If using the prescriptive compliance approach, show
compliance with the new Package C or D, or the alternate component package
for C or D (Packages A and B have both been eliminated).
The window schedule shall clearly describe the required U-factor and solar heat
gain coefficient (SHGC) values and demonstrate compliance with the Title 24
energy calculations.
Cloth backed duct tape is no longer permitted to be used as the sole connection
for mechanical ducting. Note on the plans that duct tape, as a minimum, meeting
the requirements of ULI8I, 181A, or 181B, shall be used or additional duct
attachment devices such as tie wraps or mastic will be required for installing
mechanical ducting.
Detail or note on the plans: "The. return air plenum serving the mechanical
equipment must be fully ducted from the equipment to the conditioned space.
.Drop ceilings, wall cavities and equipment platforms may not be used as
plenums."
Provide fluorescent general lighting (40 lumens per watt minimum) in kitchen(s)
and bathrooms (containing a tub or shower).
Note on the plans: "The manufactured windows shall have a label attached
certified by the National Fenestration Rating Council (NFRC) and showing
compliance with the energy calculations."
Carlsbad 01-2019
June 27, 2001
. CITY REQUIREMENTS
Nails for shear transfer connection (using A35's, etc.) may not be driven parallel to
the flanges of TJl's (i.e., along the sides), per city policy, unless specific written
approval from Trus-Joist Macmillan is first obtained. Details or notes on the plans
should make this clear. Nails may be driven perpendiculàrto TJl flanges.
New residential units must be pre-plumbed for future solar water heating. Note
"two roof jacks must be installed" where the water heater is in the one story garage
and directly below the most south facing roof (City Ordinance No. 8093).
All piping for present or future solar water heating must be insulated when in areas
that are not heated or cooled by mechanical means (City Policy).
. MISCELLANEOUS
Provide details for Laundry chute, show one-hour shaft with upper and lower
rated self-closing doors.
To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item
has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc.
Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result
of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and
where they are located in the plans.
Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list?
Please indicate:
Yes El No U
The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake
Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to
perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan
review items, please contact Bill Elizarraras at Esgil Corporation. Thank you.
I Carlsbad 01-2019
June 27, 2001
VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE
JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 01-2019
PREPARED BY: Bill Elizarraras DATE: June 27, 2001
BUILDING ADDRESS: 2443 Plo Pico Dr.
BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R3/U1 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN
BUILDING
PORTION
AREA
(Sq. Ft.)
Valuation
Multiplier
Reg.
Mod.
VALUE ($)
Dwelling 3216 City Estimate 298,101
Garage 780
Deck 220
Air Conditioning
Fire Sprinklers
TOTAL VALUE 298,101
Jurisdiction Code 1cb IBY Ordinance
Bldg. Permit Fee by Ordinance V
Plan Check Fee by Ordinance vi
Type of Review: E Complete Review
I $1,159.481
I $753.661
Structural Only
I $649.311
LI Other El Repetitive Fee
I Repeats Hourly Hour *
Esgil Plan Review Fee
Comments:
Sheet 1 of I
macvalue.doc
V BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
PLANCHECK NO.:
__
I. VPLUL:
DATE: '~'- /z S~6 /
BUILDING AODRESS:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER:
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
APPROVAL
The item you have submitted for review has been
approved. The approval is based on plans,
information and/or specifications provided in your
submittal; therefore any changes to these items after
this date, including field modifications, must be
reviewed by this office to insure continued
conformance with applicable codes. Please review
carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply
with instructions in this report can result in
suspension of permit to build.
A Right-of-Way permit is required prior to
construction of the following improvements:
DENIAL
Please sW th attached report of deficiencies
marked wit . Make necessary corrections to plans
or speci cab s for compliance with applicable
codes and stan ards. Submit corrected plans and/or
specifications to this office for review.
Date:
__________
Date: __________
By: Date:
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
ENGINEERING AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE BUILDING PERMIT:
By: JAWh A Date:
________
ATTACHMENTS
Dedication Application
Dedication Checklist
Improvement Application
Improvement Checklist
Future Improvement Agreement
Grading Permit Application
Grading Submittal Checklist
Right-of-Way Permit Application
Right-of-Way Permit Submittal Checklist
and Information Sheet
Sewer Fee Information Sheet
ENGINEERING DEPT. CONTACT PERSON
Name: JOANNE JUCHNIEWICZ
City of Carlsbad
Address: 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008
Phone: (760) 602-2775
CFD INFORMATION
Parcel Map No:
Lots:
Recordation:
Carlsbad Tract:
A-4
H:\WOROcS *QS1&&ç PIaiedi C3ist Form (Geneflc).doc 1 Rev. 7114100
sr, NDJ 3RD
A 1. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show:
North Arrow F. Right-of-Way Width & Adjacent Streets
Existing & Proposed Structures G. Driveway widths
Existing Street Improvements E xisting or proposed sewer lateral
Property Lines 'Existing or proposed water service
Easements J. Existing or proposed irrigation service
2. Show on-site plan:
A. Drainage Patterns
Building pad surface drainage must maintain a minimum slope of one
percent towards an adjoining street or an approved drainage course.
ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE: "Finish grade will provide a minimum positive
drainage of 2% to swale 5' away from building."
Eisting & Proposed Slopes and Topography
type,. location, alignment of existing or proposed sewer and water service
(s) that serves the project. Each unit requires a separate service, however,
second dwelling units and apartment complexes are an exception.
D. Sewer and water laterals should not be located within proposed driveways, per
standards.
ni
/ BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
SITE PLAN
U 3. Include on title sheet:
-5'Site address 4-- jeQ
,1)Assessor's Parcel Number 4
C. Legal Description
For commercial/industrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, include:
total building square footage with the square footage for each different use,
existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing,
warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved.
EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION
H:W0RD00C\CHKLSTBul1ifl9 plancg,ed, Cldst Form (Generic).doc 2 Rev. 7/14100
1ST 2ND 3
c)A ;cfrf
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE
4a. Project does not comp1 with the folIowin Engineeri
Project No.i4'L '2' / 2 / c'J ,
Conditions 9f approval for..
I 0 fl 4b. All conditions are in compliance. Date:
DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS
LI 0 5. Dedication for all street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the building site and any storm
drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and
for remodels with a value at or exceeding $15,000, pursuant to Carlsbad
Municipal Code Section 18.40.030.
Dedication required as follows:
Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor
prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8 1/ x 11" plat map
and submit with a title report. All easement documents must be approved and
signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. Attached please find an
application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process. Submit the
completed application form with the required checklist items and fees to the
Engineering Department in person. Applications will not be accept by mail or fax.
Dedication completed by: Date:
IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS
LI 0 0 6a. All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be
constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the
construction exceeds $75,000, pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section
18.40.040.
Public improvements required as follows:
Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public
improvement requirements. A registered Civil Engineer must prepare the
appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements
on the attached checklist to the Engineering Department through a separate plan
check process. The completed application form and the requirements on the
H:\WORD\DOCS\CHXISI\8uUding Plancheck C4dst Form (RIDDLE HARVEY 7-12-00).doc 3 Rrm. 12/26196
I/ I LI
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
1ST 2N0 3RD
checklist must be submitted in person. Applications by mail or fax are not
accepted. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted
and fees paid prior to issuance of building permit.
Improvement Plans signed by: Date:
R Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad
Municipal Code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title report or
current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $310 so we may
prepare the necessary Future Improvement Agreement. This. agreement must be
signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building permit.
Future public improvements required as follows:
El El Enclosed please find your Future ImprOvement Agreement. Please return
agreement signed and notarized to the Engineering Department.
Future Improvement Agreement completed by:. •
Date: .
El El El . 6d. No Public Improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or defective.
improvements found adiacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction
of the City Inspector prior to occupancy. . . •
GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section
11'.06.030 Of the Municipal Code.
El F fl 7a. Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading
requirements. Include accurate grading quantities (cut, fill import, export).
0 Fj El 7b. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil
Engineer must be submitted together with the completed application form
attached. NOTE: The Grading Permit must be issued and rough grading
approval obtained prior to issuance of a Building Permit.
4 '.4
Grading Inspector sign off by: Date:
El El El 7c. Graded Pad Certification required. (Note: Pad certification may be required even
if a grading permit is not required.) . .
H:W0RO\D0CS\CF(KLST'B11d1n9 Plancheck Chint Form (Generic 7-14-00)4cc 4 . Rec. 7/14/00
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
1ST 2ND 3RD
7d .No Grading Permit required.
0 7e. If grading is not required, write "No Grading" on plot plan.
MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS
A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-Way and/or
private work adjacent to the public Right-of-Way. Types of work include, but are
not limited to: street improvements, tree trimming, driveway construction, tying
into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities.
Right-of-Way permit required for:
INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT If your facility is located in the City of Carlsbad
sewer service area, you need to contact the Carlsbad Municipal Water District,
located at 5950 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008. District personnel can
provide forms and assistance, and will check to see if your business enterprise is
on the EWA Exempt List. You may telephone (760) 438-2722, extension 7153,
for assistance.
Industrial Waste permit accepted by:
Date:
O 0 0 10. NPDES PERMIT
Complies with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant shall provide best
management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to
discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by
the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever
occurs first..
I 1,uired fees are attached
U No fees required
WATER METER REVIEW
fl 12a. Domestic (potable) Use
Ensure that the meter proposed by the owner/developer is not oversized.
Oversized meters are inaccurate during low-flow conditions. If it is oversized, for
the life of the meter, the City will not accurately bill the owner for the water used.
All single family dwelling units received "standard" 1" service with 5/8" service.
H:WORDOCS\CHKl$flBuIflfl9 Plancheck Ckist Form (Generic).dOC 5 Rev. 7114100
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
1ST 2ND 3RD
If owner/developer proposes a size other than the "standard", then
owner/developer must provide potable, water demand calculations,
which include total fixture counts and maximum water demand in gallons
per minute (gpm). A typical fixture count and water demand worksheet is
attached. Once the gpm is provided, check against the "meter sizing
schedule" to verify the anticipated meter size for the unit.
Maximum service and meter size is a 2" service with a 2" meter.
If a developer is proposing , a meter greater than 2", suggest the
installation of multiple 2" services as needed to provide the anticipated
demand. (manifolds are considered on case by case basis to limit
multiple trenching into the street).
R. fl 12b. Irrigation Use (where recycled water is not available)
All irrigation meters must be sized via irrigation calculations (in gpm) prior
to approval. The developer must provide these calculations. Please follow
these guidelines:
If the project is a newer development (newer than 1998), check the recent
improvement plans and observe if the new irrigation service is reflected on
the improvement sheets. If so, at the water meter station, the demand in
gpm may be listed there. Irrigation services are listed with a circled "I",
and potable water is typically a circled "W". The irrigation service should
look like:
_i -.. STA 1+00 Install 2" service and
I ' 1.5: meter (estimated 100 *gpm)
If the improvement plans do not list the irrigation meter and the
service/meter will be installed via another instrument such as the building
plans or grading plans (wl a right of way permit of course), then the
applicant must provide irrigation calculations for estimated worst-ease
irrigation demand (largest zone with the farthest reach). Typically, Larry
Black has already reviewed this if landscape plans' have been prepared,
but the applicant must provide the calculations to you for your use. Once
you have received a good example of irrigation 'calculations, keep a set for
your reference. In general the calculations will include:
Hydraulic grade line
Elevation at point of connection (POC)
Pressure at POC in pounds per square inch (PSI)
Worse case zone (largest, farthest away from valve
Total Sprinkler heads listed (with gpm use per head)
Include a 10% residual pressure at point of connection
3. In general, all major sloped areas of a subdivision/project are to be
irrigated via separate irrigation meters (unless the project is only SFD with
no HOA). As long as the project is located within the City recycled water
H:WORDDOCSCHKLSTBuilthng Panthedc Cklst Form (Geneulc).dOc
. 6 Rev. 7/14100
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
1ST 2ND 3RD
service boundary, the City intends on switching these irrigation
services/meters to a new recycled water line in the future.
E E 12c. Irrigation Use (where recycled water is available)
Recycled water meters are sized the same as the irrigation meter above.
If a project fronts a street with recycled water, then they should be
connecting to this line to irrigate slopes within the development. For
subdivisions, this should have been identified, and implemented on the
improvement plans. Installing recycled water meters is a benefit for the
applicant since they are exempt from paying the San Diego County Water
Capacity fees. However, if they front a. street which the recycled water is
there, but is not live (sometimes they are charged with potable water until
recycled water is available), then the applicant must pay the San Diego
Water Capacity Charge. If within three years, the recycled water line is
charged with recycled water by CMWD, then the applicant can apply for a
refund to the San Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA) for a refund.
However, let the applicant know that we cannot guarantee the refund, and
they must deal with the SDCWA for this.
E J . 13. Additional Comments:
H:WORDDOCS04KL$T\BuildIflQ PWicheck CIdS* Form (Generic) doe 7 .
Rev. 7I1400
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET
0 stimate based on unconfirmed information from applicant.
Calculation based on building plancheck plan submittal.
Address: c{"( 9ro 1Lo C Bldg. Permit No._________________
Prepared by: Date: Checked by: Date:
EDU CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses.
Types of Use: S1 f') Sq. Ft./Units:/ EDU's:
Types of Use: Sq. Ft./Units: EDU's:
ADT CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses.
Types of Use: S L1 Sq. Ft./Units: ADTs:
Types of Use: Sq. Ft./Units: ADT's:
FEES REQUIRED:
WITHIN CFD: 0 YES (no bridge & thoroughfare fee in District #1, reduced Traffic Impact Fee) 0 NO
0/1.
PARK-IN-LIEU FEE PARK AREA & #:
FEE/UNIT: X NO. UNITS: . =$?&t-z'e P,t1
O 2. TRAFFIC7T FEE
X FEE/ADT: ••.1/ = 7/U L''
3 BRIDGE D THOROUGHFARE FEE (DIST #1 DIST #2 DIST #3
ADTs/UNITS: X FEE/ADT:________
4. FACILITIES MANAGEMENT FEE ZONE:_________
UNIT/SQ.FT.: X FEE/SQ.FT./U NIT: = $____________
5. SEWER FEE c' i- IJ11 I V
EDU's: ( X FEE/EDU: I '' j = $________________
BENEFIT AREA: -
EDU's: X FEE/EDU: =$_____________
6. SEWER LATERAL ($2,500) =$____________
7. DRAINAGE FEES PLDA : HIGH /LOW_______
ACRES: X FEE/AC: —$ c4—@ I" ()
O 8. POTABLE WATER FEES
UNITS CODE CONNECTION FEE METER FEE SDCWA FEE IRRIGATION
1 of
WordDocs\MJsformsFee Calculation Worksheet Rev. 7/14/00
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET
o 9. RECLAIMED WATER FEES
UNITS CODE CONNECTION FEE METER FEE
TOTAL OF ABOVE FEES*: $
*NOTE: This calculation sheet is NOT a complete list of all fees which may be due.
Dedications and Improvements may also be required with Building Permits.
2 of 2
Word\Docs\MisformsFae Calculation Worksheet Rev. 7/14/00
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST
/
Plan Check No. CBO1&O(C1 Address O?L/i / 10 107
Planner Greg Fisher Phone (760) 602-4629
APN:/5(3I'IS
Type of Project & Use: Net Project Density: DU/AC"
4 Zoning: -( General Plan: RL171 Facilities Management Zone: I
CFD (in/niit # Date of participation: Remaining n'et dev acres:______
Circle One
>. >.
(For non-residential development: Type of land used created by
i this permit:________________________________________________ o 0 0 C C c t cc
CL CL CL
Legend: z Item Complete Item Incomplete - Needs your action 7
F-1 Environmental Review Requièd: YES _ NO TYPE
DATE OF COMPLETION:
Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action.
Conditions of Approval:
f7 F1 F1 Discretionary Action Required: YES NO )< TYPE
LOW
APPROVAL/RESO. NO. DATE
PROJECT NO.
OTHER RELATED CASES:
Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action.
Conditions of Approvl:______________________________________________________
Coastal Zone Assessment'/Compliance .
Project site located in Coastal Zone? YES MO y
CQoastal Commission Authority? YES NO____
If California Coastal Commission Authority: çcta'ct them at - 3111 Camino Del Rio North, SUite
200, San Diego CA 92108-1725; (619) 91'-8O36
Determine status (Coastal Perm,Aquired or Exempt):
Coastal Permit Determination)10rm already completed? YES NO____
If NO, complete Coastal Permit,7etermination Form now.
Coastal Permit Determic'tion Log #:
Follow-Up Actions/
". •1' Stamp BüilØfng Plans as "Exempt" or "Coastal Permit Required" (at minimum
Floor Plar)').
CompleJ Coastal Permit Determination Log as needed..
H:\ADMlN\COUNTER\BldPlnchkRevChklSt
E Inclusionary Housing Fee required: YES >( NO
Activ"ity'Main~nancq, enter
LII LI 3. Lot Coverage: Required 1 '
LII LI
LI 5. Parking: Spaces Required 2. Shown
Guest Spaces Required Shown
(Effective date of Inclusionary Housing Ordinance - May 21, 1993.)
Data Entry -Completed? YES NO
(A/P/Ds, CB#, toolbar, Screens, Housing sing Pees,-Construct Housing Y/N, Enter Fee, UPDATE!)
Site Plan:
LI LI Provide a fully dimensional site pith-drawn to scale. Show: North arrow,
property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing
Street improvements, right-of-wa y width, dimensional' setbacks and existing
topographical lines.
LI LI Provide legal description of property and assessor's parcel number.
Zoning:
LI LI Setbacks:
Front: Required 070 Shown
Interior Side: Required Shown
Street Side: Reqifed Shown
Rear: Required (0 Shown I (
LII LI Accessory structure setbacks:
Front: Requireä\______________ Show______________
Interior Side: Required \ Shown \
Street Side: Required \ Shown \
Rear: Required Shown
Structure separation: Required Shown
'(dir) Shown
4. Height: Required 30 Shown
LI LI LI Additional Comments______________________________________________________
OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER DATE
H:\ADMIN\COUNTER\BldgPlnchkRevChklst
3 C
9 2-
c ( I a
O
24-j4 c3/4.);
1:P4
• IT
•
S ( )
•
•
- •
24 __
S
H
L
Lk
2 ac r'
ço r2 ()
H
1O1&
• • is'_I :
24-cc -
- a4'
zLz 14
Ic \
.: zca
F.
:
°
sp
SDL ;L C&O/rA
c)c L--czZ
c)rL
1 LLl= os '-cjo flbO\4:
1 L
ITZ
-Lz
ALLIED EARTH TECHNOLOGY
P.O.BOX 1932 .EL CAJOI', CALIFORNIA 92022-1932
TELEPHONE(619)447-4747
ROBERT CHAN, P.E. September 1,.200d
Mrs. Natalie Nelms
2445 Pio Pico Driv,
Carlsbad, CA. 92008-1040
:Subject: Project No. 00-1106E4 .
Soil Investigation .
Profo'sed Residential Building Site.
2445io Pico Drive
. Carlsbad, California:
Dear Mrs. Nelms H :
In accordance with your request • and authorizat&n, we 'have completed soil
investigation for the site for the:proposed residential building, located at 2445 Pio Pico,
- Drive, in the City Of Carlsbad, State Of California.
Subject property is more specifically referred to as being Assessor's Parcel No. 156-351-
12, in the City of Carlsbad, Stat of California. •• .
We are pleased to submit the accompanying soil investigation report to present our
findings, conclusions and recommendations relative to the safe and economical
development of the reject site. ••
The investigation was, conducted under the supervision of the undersigned. Th: scope of
our investigation included field éxp1oration laboratory testing and geotechnical analysis.
No major adverse soil conditions were encountered which would prohibit the proposed
development of the project site. • •
This opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated. Should you.have any questions
regarding the contents of this report, please do not hesitate to contact our office.
ZLIED E TH C OLOGY
ROBE
71
CM
eE:
.
I
I
j S
TABLE OF CONTENTS
S INTROUCTION :.............................................
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT .................................
SCOPE OF WORK
FIELD IVESTIGATION L
-
LABOR). TORY TESTS .........................................
SITE DESCRIPTION ............................................
REGIONAL GEOLOGY.........................................
SITE GEOLOGY
GROUNDWATER
TECTONIC SETTING ......................... ..............
GEOLOGIC HAZARDS
Groundshakiig ...........................................
Liquefaction Potential ............. .;................
Landslides ....................... ........................
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
General........................................................
Grading.............................................. Foundation and Slab Design ...........................
UBC Seismic Coefficients ...........................
Backfill in Utility Trenches .........................
Surface Drainage and Maintenance ..................
Foundation Plan R'iev ..............................
4 LIMITATION AND UNIFORMITY OF CONDITIONS
Page No.
I
2
3
3
.4
4
4
5
- 5
6
I
6
6
8
9
10
11
11
ALLIED EARTH TECHNOLOGY.
P.O.BOX 1932 .EL CAJON, CALIFORNIA 92022-1932
TELEPHONE(619)447-4747
ROBERT CHAN, P.E.
September 1, 2000
SOTh INVESTIGATION
INTRODUCTION
This report presents the findings and conclusions of a soil irvestigation conducted
at the site of a proposed single-family residence,, located at 2445 Pio Pico Drive, in the.
" City of Carlsbad, State of California. . • •
Subject property is more specifically referred to as being Assessor's Parcel No.
156-351-12, in the City of Carlsbad, State of California
The location of the property is shown on Figure No 1, entitled, "Site Location
Map". . . .
.
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
-
Ifls our understanding that a new residence is proposed westerly and behind the
existing tesidence on subject property. The ptoposed structure will be twO-stories in
height, of woodfranie and raised wbodfioor construction.
1
SCOPE OF WORK •
The objectives of the investigation were as follows
1. To inspect and determine the subsurface geotechnical conditions and certain
physical engineering properties of the soils beneath the site
0
1
2 Evaluate any potential adverse geotechmcal conditions that could affect the
1 • •
Poject N9o. 00-1 106E4 Bergmann 09/01/00 Page 2
2445 Pio Pico Drive
proposed development of the site .as shown, on site plan provided by client.
Provide engineering recommendations for the safe and economical developrnent
of the site as proposed.
In order to accomplish these objectives, three exploratOty boringsWere
excavated and inspected, and representatfve samples of the subsurface soils were
collected forlaboratoiy testing and analysis
The data derived from our field observations and the laboratory test results were
reviewed and ana1yed, land a summary of our preliminary findings, opinions and
recommendations is presented in this report
FIELD INVESTIGATION
The field- exploratory phase of our investigation was performed on August 17,
2000, and involved the excavation of three exploratory borings at locations as determined
by our field personnel. The exploratory borings were excavated with a truck-mounted
continuous flight auger. The expipratory borings were excavated to a depth of 5.0 feet
below existing ground surface. The apprOximate location of the exploratory borings is
shown on Figure No. 2, entitled, "Approximate Location of Exploratory Borings".
The drilling operation was perfbrmed under the direction of our field personnel,
and a continuous log ofthesoil types encountered in the borings was recorded at the
time of excavation, and is shown on Figure Nos 3 to 5, inclusive, each entitled, "Boring
Prbject No. 00-1 106E4 .Bergmann 09/01/00 Page 3
2445 Piô Pico Drive
Log Sheet".
The soils Were visually and texturally classified by the field identification
procedures set forth on the Unified Soil Classification Chart: Representative samples
were obtained at varioug depths in the exploratory borings.
LABORATORY TESTS
The samples collected during our field investigation were subjected to various
tests in the laboratory to evaluate their engineering characteristics. The tests were
performed in accordance with current A.ST.M. testing standards or other regulatory
agency testing procedures. A summary of the tests that were performed and the final test
(esults are presented in Appendix II hereto
The tests that were performed included determinations of the maximum dry
densities and optimum moisture contents, as well as the Expansion Indices of the soils
encountered.
SITE DESCRIPTION -
-------------
Subject property consists of a rectangular-shaped property of approximately
1 0 acre, located on the west side of Pio Pico Drive, between as Flores Drive and Forest
Avenue. The property is relatively lev'el, with drainage in a general westerly direction.
A single-family residence currently occupies the front, easterly portion of the site The
proposed structure will be located westerly and rear of the existing residence
Project No. 00-1 106E4 Bergmann 09/01/00 Page 4 71 2445 Pio Pico Drive
REGIONAL GEOLOGY 1
The site is located within the southern coastal strip region of the Peninsular Range
Geomorphic Province of California. This geomorphic province iis, characterized by
mountainous terrain to the east composed mostly of Mesozoic igneous and metamorphic
rocks and relatively low-lying coastal terraces to the west underlain by late Cretaceous,
Tertiary and Quaternary sedimentary roéks. Most of the City ofiCarlsbad, including
the site, occurs within the westerly portion of this coastal region and are underlain by
sedimentary rocks..
.
::. . After the bulk of the sedimentary rocks were deposited the land surface was
uplifted and was dissected by a system of canyon drainages. The primary system of
drainages flows typically to the west and is fed by a system of secondary dra1inage,
which generally enter these from the south and north.
. .
SITE GEOLOGY
. . ..
A review of geologic maps, as well as observations made during our subsurface'
investigation, indicated that the site is underlain by Quaternary-age terrace deposits
consisting of brown silty sands. The top 2.5 to 3.0 feet of these trrace deposits were
found to be dry and loose. Beneath this topsoil layer, the terrace deposits were found to
be medium dense to dense in cdsistency.
GROUNDWATER
No groundwater was encountered in the exploratory borings to the maximum
Project No. 00-1106E4 Bergmann 09/01/00 Page 5
- 2445 Pio'Pico Drive
depth of exploration at 5.0 feet. .
TECTONIC SETTING
No evidence of faulting was noted during our surface lconnaissance or in or
explortory borings. It shOuld be noted that much of southern California, including the
City of Carlsbad area, is characterized by a series of Quaternary-age fault zones which
typically strike in a northerly to northwesterly direction. Sonic of these fault zbnes (and
individaI faults within the zone) are classified as active while others are èlassified as
only pOtentially active according to the criteria of the California Division of Mines and
.Geology.
A review of available geologic maps indicate that the subject property is
approximately 37.9 km (23.7 miles) southwest of the active. Elsinore-Ju1an Fult Zone,
and approximately 9.0 km (5.6 miles) southeast of the Newport-Inglewood Fault Zone..
GEOLOGIC HAZARDS . . -.
Groundshaking - The most likely geologic hazard to affect the site is groundshakingas a
result of movement along one of the active fault zones mentioned above. Construction
in accordance with the minimum standards of theUniform Bi1ding Code and
requirements of the governing jurisdiction should minimize potential structural damage
due toseismic activity. Sei6ic soil coefficients. In accordance with the current Uniform
Building Code were determined with the UBCSEIS Program and presented herein
Liquefaction Potential - In consideration of the medium dense to dense terrace deposit
Project No. 00-1 106E4 IBergmann 09/01/90 Page6
2445 Pio Pico Drive
' encountered on the site, and d lack of a near-surface groundwater table, it is our, opinion
that soil liquefaction does not present a significant geotechnThal hazard to the proposed
site development, 'provided that the recommendations presented herein are followed.
Landslides - Subject property is located in relatively level terrain and underlain by stable
soils No evidence of any ancient landslid was noted on subject and adjaceni
properties, and the potential for any landslides is considered to be negligible
Other potential geologic hazards such as tsunamis and seiches should be considered
negligible or nonexistent
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
-
General.
1. No adverse soil conditions were encountered which would prohibit the currently
proposed development-of the project site. H !'
2 All of the soils encountered on the site are suible for use as supporting matenals
for the proposed structure and/or fill soils, provided that the recommendations
contained herein are foilowed
' The soils ehcountered oñ'the site possess low expansion potential (Expansion
Index 35). '.
Grading
------------
, It is recommended that, all earthwork be accomplished in accordance with the
Project No 00-1 106E4 Bergmann 09/0/00 Page 7
2445 Pio Pico Drive -
Grading Ordinance df the City of Carlsbad, UBC Chapter A33, Appendix I
attached hereto, entitled, "General Grading and Earthwork Specifications", and
recommendations as presented in this Sectior.
5. Where the recommendations of this Section of the report conflict with those of
Appendix I, this Section of the report takes precedence.
6 Grading operation should begin with the clearing and grubbing of the site All
debris should be hauled off and disposed of offsite
it is recommended that the loose Upper soils similar to tl ose encountered in all
boring locations to depths varying from 2.0 to 3.0 feet that remained below
finished grade be removed. The bottom of the excavation should be scarified to a
depth of 8 inches; the removed soils properly moistened and uniformly
recompacted to at least 90 percent of maximum dry den thty, prior-to the
placement of additional fill soils.
The fill soils should be placed in layers and compacted until proposed grade
elevations are reached. The layers of fill should notexceed 8 inches to allow for
adequate bonding. All fill soils should be compacted to at least 90 percent of
maximum dry density in accordance with A.S.T.M. D1557-91.
'• 9. As an alternative to the removal and recompaction of the upper loose sails, the
footings for the proposed residence, which has a raised woodfloor, may be
Project Nb. 00-1106E4 : Bergmann 09/01/00 Page 8
2445 Pio Pico Drive
extended through these upper loose soilsatleast 12 inches into the underlying
competent natural soils. The proposed garage , however, will have perimeter
fobtings and slab-on-grade, and removal and recompaction as outlined above will
benecessary. -
Foundation and Slab Design
10. A safe allowable soil bearing value of 1;500 pounds per square foot may be used
in the design and checking of continuous or spread footings that are a minimum of
12 and 24 inches in minimum horizontal dimension, respectively, and are
embedded at least 12 inches below the surface of the competent natural or
compacted fih1 soils..
- •
11; Tl above safe allowable sol bearing value may be increased. 300 pounds per
square foot for each additional footing of depth and width; to a maximum of 3000
pounds per square foot.
12 The above safe allowable soil bearing value may be further increased by one third
when considering wind and/or seismic forces
1:
The settlement of foundations, when designed and loaded as outlined above, is
within acceptable tolerance limits for residential structures of this type.
It is reco'mme'llded that all continuous footings be reinforced with 2.95 rebars; one
rebar :located nearthe top, and the other rebar near the bottom of the footings.
Project No 00-1 106E4 : Bergmann 09/01/00 Page 9
2445 Pio Pico Drive
15. The concrete slab on grade of the garage should be 4 inches net in thickness, and
Be reinforced with #3 rebars @ 18 inches on center in-both ;directions, placed at
mid-height Of slab. The concrete slab should be underlain by 4 inches of clean
sand. In areas to be tiled or carpeted,. a visqueen-type moisture barrier should be
laced at grade and be overlain by otie inch of protective sand cover. This
iioisture barrier should be heavily overlapped or sealed at splices Please note
that the foundation and slab reinforcements are based on soil charactenstics, and
should be superseded by any requirements of the project. architect.
16 It is recomnnded that our firm inspect the foundation trench excavations for the
proposed structure to ensure proper embedment into competent natural or
càmpacted fill soils. •
•
UBC Seismic Coefficients •
17 dround Motion - The proposed structure should be designed and constructed to
resist the effects fseisrnic ground motions as provided in Section 1626 of the
1:997 Uniform Building Code. The basis of the design is dependent OIl: and
Considers seismic zoning, site characteistics, occupancy configuration; structural
system and building height.
18. Soil Profile Type —Jn accordance with Section 1629.3.1, Tâble;16-J, and the
underlying geolqgic conditions, a site Soil Profile of Sc is considered appropriate
• • -
Project No 00-1 106E4 Bergmann 09/01/00 Page 10
2445 Pio Pico Drive -
for the subject property.
19. Seismic Zone - In accordance with Section -1629 and Figure No. 1602, the subject
site is situated within Seismic Zone 4.
S
20 Seismic Zone Factor (z) - A seismic zone factor of 0.4 is assigned based on Table
16-I. Since the site is within Seismic Zone 4, Section 1629.4.2 requires a seismic
source type and near sOurce factor.
I. Near-source Factor (N&--and Nv) - Based on the known active faults in the region
and distance of the faults from the site, a Seismic Source Type B per Table 16-U,
and Near Source Factor. of Na = 1 0 per Table 16-S. and Nv = 1.0 per Table 16-T
are provided.
Seismic Coefflcients (Ca and Cv) - Using the Soil Profile Type and. Seismic Zone
Factor along with Tdble 16-Q and 16-R, the Seismic Coefficients are Ca = 0.40
and Cv=O.58. S
S
The Design Response Spectruth for subjett property is presented on Figure No. 6.
Backfill In Utility Trenches
24-Backfill soilsplaced in utility trenches should beompacted to at least 90 percent
of maximum thy density. S S
S S .
S
Project No. QQ-1 106134 Bergman 09/01/00 Page 11
2445.Pio Pico Drive
Surface Drainage and Maintenance I S
25. Adequate drainage control and proper maintenance of all drainage facilities are
imperative to minimize the infiltration of surface water into the underlying soil
mass in order to reduce settlement potential add to minimize erosion. The
building areas should have drainage swales which direct storm and excess
•. -
irrigation water away from the structures and into the street gutters or other
drainage facilitie$ No surface runoff should be allowed to pond adjacent to the
foundation. -
Foundation Plan Review
26 It isrecommended that our firm review the final foundation plans for the
proposed site de)elopment to verify their compliance with the Uniform
Building Code, Chapter A33, as required by the State of California
.5 LIMITATION AND UNIFORMITY OF CONDITIONS
1 The preliminary findings and recommendations contained in this report pertain
only to the site investigated-and are bdsed on the assumption that the soil
conditions beneath the entire site do not deviate substantially from those dislosed
in the exploratory borings. If any variations or undesirable conditions are
encountered during grading, or if the scopeof the projectthffersfrom that
planned at the present time, our firm should be notified in order that supplemental
can be presented, if necessary.
-
Project No. 00-1 106E4 Bergrnani 09/01/00
2445 Pio Pico Drive
Page 12
This report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibihty of the
Owner, or his representative, to ensure that the information and recommendations
presentedlierein are brought to the attention of the Project Architectñd Engineer
and are incorporated into the plans and specifications for the projet.
Furthetmore, the Owner, or his representative, will also be responsible for taking
the necessary measures to ensure that the Contractor and subcontractgrs properly
carry out the recommendations in the field.
Professional opinions and recommendations presented in this report are based
partly on our evaluation and analysis of the technical information gathered during :
our study, partly on the currently available information regarding the proposed
project, and partly on our previous experience with similar soil conditions and
projects of similar scope. Our study has.been performed in accordance with the
minimum standards of care exercised by other professional geotechhical
:
consultants currently practicing in the same locality. We do not, however, I
guarantee the-performance of the proposed project in any respect, and no
warrahties of any kind, expressed or implied, are made or intended
connection with the study performed by ourfirm.
The findi'ngsnd recommendation' containedin this report are valid as of the
present date. However, changes in the conditions of the property could occur
with the passage of time, whether they be due to natural processes or due to man
1
Project No. 00-1106E4 Bergmann 09/01/00 Page 13
2445 Pio Piço Drive
made actions on the subject and/or adjacent properties.. In addition, changes in
applicable or appropriate standards may occur, whether they result from
legislatkn or the broadening of knowledge. Accordingly, the findihgs of this
report may b invalidated, wholly or partially, by changes outside of our control.
Therdfore, this report is subject toeview by! our firm and should not be relied
upon after á period of two years.
Figure Nos I to 6, inclusive, and Appendices I and II are parts of this report
U.
( S
W:\ 14\S11L7\ L
\\ :
IiIi N''\
VIA TA
uj ç 'Rs
KNOWE
. '-'- "• i - ' I : jLL__JL-- .•;• mçuNA OR brary
M5,
— (
- Army andNvy ' Academy \J \ N
c CARLSBAI
SITE LOCATION -,-'MAP
PROJECT NO:00/0f4 FIGURE NO. I
—--—S -
2.67'±
44 14 lQj
1(7 3f,
44
77 non ig F7~
0 •
0 •O 0
S
0 0 0 I
. 08-3 0
50 55 0
• •;S • • 0 -SO.
050 -•
0
_______________________ _________ _____________ ______________ _________________ • • ..
267
000
.4PP0/flAT LOCT/ON or 0
•-•• .•• S
00 SO
•
00 05 ..............0 oS0
4PPi'OA7M4 T( LOCATION 'or £K,LO,A rar
iR/OIfCT NO OO-//OEL — — — fl6(JI NO Z
DESIGN R-ESPONSE''SPECTRUM".
2.5
0)'
''''''''''''''''''
0
!1.5.
C) o
1.0
Co
4J,
.......... 0
Cl) 0.5
0.0
Seismic Zone: 0.4 Soil Profile: SC
0.0 0.51.0 1.5 2.0 2..5 3.0. 3.5:4.04.5. '5.0
.
' Peñod Seconds
PROJECT''NO. 00 -1106E4 . FGURE NO. 6
APPENDIX I
GENERAL GRADING AND EARTHWORK SPECIFICATIONS
General S
These recommended grading and earthwork specifications are
intended to be a. part of and to supplement the Geotechnical
Report(s). In the event of a conflict, the recommendations
of the Geotechnical Report(s) will, supersede -. these
specifications. Observations during the course of earthwork
operations may result in additional, new or revised
recommendat1ois that could supersede these specifications
and/or the recommendations in the Geotéchnical Report(s).
The Owner or his authorized representative shall procufe the
services of .a qualified Geotechnic:al Consulting Firm,
hereafter to be referred to as the "Geotecthical
'Consult-ant". (often the same entity that produced the
Geotechnical Report(s).
-
The Geotechnica], Consultant shall be given a schedule of
work by. the Earthwork Contractor for the subject project, so
astô be able to perform required observations, testing and
mapping of work inprogress in a timely manner.
The work herein includes all activities from clearing-and
grubbing through fine grading. Included are trenching,
excavation, backfilling, compacting and grading. All work
shall be as shown on the approved project drawings.
The Geotechnical Consultant or a qualified representative
shall be project on site as required, to observe, map and
document the subsurface • exposures so as to verify the
geotechnical desisign suppositions. In the event, that
observed conditions are found to be significantly different
from the interpreted corid4tions during the design phase, the
Geotechnical Consultant shall notify the Owner, recommend
appropriate phanges in design to suit the observed
conditions and notify the ageñc(ies) having jurisdiction,
where required. Subsurface areas to be geotechnically
observed, mapped, record elevations 1 or tested include
cleared natural ground for redeiving fill or. structures,
"remedial removal" areas, key bdtoms and benches.
The guidelines contained herein and any standard details
attached herewith represent this firm's recommendations for
the grading and all assocaited'operat1ons on the subject
project. These guidelines shall be considered to be a part
1.3
APPENDIX 'I Page
of these Specifiôations.
1.7 It interpretation of these guidelines or
result in a dispute(s), the Geotechnical
conclude the appropriate interpretation.
standard details.
Consultant shall
1.8 The Geotechnical Consultant sall observe the processing of '
subgade and rill materials and perform the required
compaction .testng. The test results shall be provided to
the 0wner and. the Contractor. and it, so required, to the
agenc(ies) having Juridication.
1.9 The Geotechnical Consultant shall ñotprovide "supeivision"
or any "direction" of work in progress to the 'Earthwork'
'Contractor, or to any ot.:the Contractor's employees or to.
any of the Contractor's agents.
1.10 The Earthwork Contractor : The: Earthwork Contractor
(Contractor) shall be qualified, experienced, and.
knowledgeabl-e' in earthwork logistics, preparation and
processing of ground to receive fill; moisture-conditioning
I and processing of fill, and compacting fill. The Contractor
shall review and accept the plans, geotechnical report(s),
and these Specifications prior to commencement of grad1ng.'
The Contractor shall be solely responsible for performing.'-'
'the grading 'in accordance with the plans and specifications.-
'The Contractor shall prepare and submit to the Owner-and the
Geôtechnical Consultant a work plan that indicates the
sequence of earthwork grading, the number of "spreads" of
work and the . estimated quantities of daily earthwork-i
contemplated for the site pfior to commencement of -grading.'
The Contractor shall inform the Owner and the Geotechnical
Consultant of changesin work schedules 'and updates to the
work-plan at least 24 hours in advance of such changes so
thatappropiate,iobservations and tests can be planned and1
accomplished. The Contractor shall not assume that the
Geotechnical Consultant is aware of all grading operations.
The Contractor shall have the sole responsibility to provide
adequate equipment and methddd to accomplish the earthwork
in accordance with the applicable grading codes and agency
ordinances, these Specifications, and the recommendations in
the approved geotechnical report(s) and grading plans(s).
It, in the opinion of 'the Geotechnical Consultant,
unsatisfactory conditions, such as unsuitable soil, improper
APPENDIX I :. Page 3
moisture condition, inadequate compaction, insufficient
buttress key size, adverse weather, etc.,are resulting in a
quality of work less than required in these specifications.
the Geotechnical Consultant shall reject the work and may
recommendto the owner that cnstruôtion b-0 stopped until the
conditions are rectified.
2.0 Preparation of Areas to be Filled
11 -
2.1 Clearing and Grubbing : Vegetation, such. as brush, grass,
roots,-and -other deleterious material sha-ll be sufficiently
removed and properly disposed of in a method acceptable to
the owner, governing agencies and the Geoteçhnical
Consultant.
The Géotechnical Consultant shah evaluate the extent of
these removals depending on specific site conditions. Earth
fill material shall not contai more than 1 percent: of
! organic materials (by volume). No fill shall contain more
than 5 precent of organic matter. Nesting of the organic
materials shall not be allowed. :
It potentially hazardous materials are encountered, the
Contractor shall" stop work in the at tectd area, and a
hazardous materialspecialist shall be int'ormed immediately
for proper evaluation and handling of these materials prior
to continuing to work in that area.
As presently defined by the State of California, most
refined petroleum products (gasoline, diesel fuel, motor
oil, grease, coolant, etc.) have chemical constituents that
are? consi4ered to be hazardous waste. . . As: such, the
indiscriminate dumping or spillage of these fluids onto the
- ground may constitute a: misdemeanor, punishable by fines
and/or Imprisonment, and shall not be allowed. -
Materials used for fill, either mported1 or on-site, shall
not: contain hazardous materials as defined by the California
Code of 'Regulations, Title 22, Division 4, Cha:pter 30,
Article 9 and 10; 40CFR, and any other applicable lOcal,
state or ,federal laws. The Consultant shall not be
responsible for the identification or analysis of the
potential presence of hazardous. materials. However, if
observations, odors or soil discoloration cause Consultant
to i suspect the presence of -hazardous mateials!, the
Consultant may request from the Owner the termination of
grading operations within the.affected area. ':rior to
APFENbIX .1 Page 4
resuming grading operations, the Owner shall 1provide a
written report to the Consultant indicating that the
suspected materials are not; hazardous as defined by
applicable laws and regulations..
Any asphaltic pavement mater.jal removed during clearing
operations should be properly 'disposed at an approved off-
site fcility Concrete fragments - which are free of
reinforcing steel may be placed in fills, provided they are
placed In accordance with Section 6.2 or 6.3 of this
document.
During grading, soil or groundwater conditions other than
those identified in the Geotechnical Reporti may be
encountered by the Contractor. The' Consultant shall be
notified immeidately to evaluate the significance of the
unanticipated condition.
Processing : Existing ground that has been declared
satisfactory for support of fill by the GeoteChnical
Consultant shall be scarified to a: minimum .depth of 6
inches. Existing ground that is not satisfaptory shall be
overexcavated as specified in the ;followIng section:
Scarification shall continue until soils are broken down and
free•of large dlay lumps or clods and çhe working surface is
reasonably unifqrm, flat, and:free of--uneven features that
would inhibit uniform compaction.
Over-excavation : In addition to removals and overexcavations
recornended in the approved gedtechnical report (s) and the
grading plan, soft, loose, dry,- saturated, spongy, organic-
rich highly fractured or otherwise unsuitable ground shall
be -overexcavated to competent ground'as evaluated by the
Geotechnical Consultant during grading.
Benching : Where fills are to be placed on g-round with
slopes steeper than 5 : 1 (horizontal : vertical), the
ground shall be stepped or bened. Please see the Standard
Details for a graphic illustration. The lowest bench or key
shall be a minimum of 15 feet wide and at least 2:feet deep,:
into competent material as evaluated by the Gêoteehnical
Consultãnt, Other benches shall be excavated a minimum
height of 4 feet into competent material or as otherwise
recommended by the Geotechnical Consultant. Fill placed on
ground sloping flatter than 5 : 1. shall also -..,,,.be benched or
otherwise overexcavated to provide a f.lat subgradó for the
fill.
-F-
2.2
2.3
APPENDIX! : Page 5:
2.7 Eva1uatio/Acceptance of Fill Areas : All 'areas to receive
fill, izfciuding removal and processed areas, key bottoms,
and benches, shall be observed, mapped, elevations recorded,
and/or tested prior to being accepted by the Geotechnical
Consultant as suitable to receive fill, the contractor
shall oba'1n a written acceptance from the Geotechnical
Consultant' 'prior to fill placement. A licensed surveyor
shall provide thesurvey control for determining elevations
of processed areas, keys, and benches.
3.0 Fill Material
3.1
-------------
General : -Material to be used as fill shall be essentially
tree of organic matter other deleterious substances ,and
evaluated and accepted by the Geotechnical'Consu'ltarit prior
to placement. Soils of poor quality,' such as ithose with
unacceptable gradation, high expansion potential,' or low
' strenght shall be placed in: areas: acceptable to the
Geotechnical Consultant or mixed with other soils to achieve
satisfactory fill,matèrial. "
3.2 Oversize :: Oversize: material -defined as rock, ,or other
• Irreducible material with a maximum dimension greater than 8
Inches shall no be buried or placed In fill' unless
location, "materiais and placement methods,, are spectICálly
accepted by the Geotechnical Consultant. Placement
operations - shall be such that nesting of oversized material
does not occur and such that oversize material is competely
surrounded' by compacted or 'densified fill. . Oversize
material stall not be placed within 10 vertic4l feet of
finish grade or -:within 2 feet of future utflities or
underground construôtion. '
3.3' Import :'If importing of till material is required for
grading, proposed import' material shall meet -the
requiremens of Section 3.1. The potential Import source
shall be tgiven to the Geotechnical Consultant at least 48
hours (2 working days) before importing begins so that Its
suitability can "be deterthined and: appropriate tests
performed.
4.0 'Fill Placement and CompactIon
4.1.,
-----------
Fill Layer : Approved 'fill rnterial shall be placed in areas
prepared to receive till -(per Section 3.0) in near-
APPENDIX I '
S ' •.
Page 6
horizontal layers-not exceedIng 8 inches in. loose thickness.
The Geotechnical Consultant may accept thicker layers if
testing 'indicates the grading procedures can adequately
compact the. thicker layers. Each layer shall be spread
evenly and mixed thoroughly to' attain relative uniformity of
material and moisture throughout.
4.2 Fill Moi-sture Conditioning : Fill soils shall be watered,
dried back, blended, and/or:mixed, as -necessary to attain a
relatively uniform moisture content or slightly over -at
optimum. Maximum density and optimum soil moisture content
tests shall be performed in 'accordance with the American
Society o' Testirg and Materials (ASTM Test Method D1557-
91).
4.3 Compactionot Fill, : After each layer has been'moisture-
conditioned, mixed, :and evenly spread, it shall be uniformly
compacted to not less' than 90 percent at maximum dry density
(ASTM Test Method D1557-91). COmpaction equipnint shall be
adequately sized .and be either specifically designed for
soil compaction Or of proven reliability to efficiently
achieve the specified level of compaction with uniformity.
- 4.4 Compaction of Fill Slopes : In additioz to normalcompact1on
procedures specited above, compaction otsiopes shall be
accomplished by backrolling of slopes with sheepstoot
rollers at increments.ot 3 to 4 feet in till elevation, or
by other methods producing satisfactory results acceptable
to the Geotechnical Consultant. "Upon completion of grading,
relative c-ompaction of the till, out to the slope face,
shall be at least 90 percent of maximum dry density per ASTM
Test Method,. D1557-91.
4.5 Compaction Testing : ' Fi1d.tess for moisture dontent and
relative compaction of the fill soils shall be performed by
the Geotechnical Consultant. Location and frequency* of
tests shall be at the Consultant's discretion based on field
conditionsencount
.
red. Compaction test locations will:not
necessarily be selected on a random basis.:. Test locations
shall be selected to verity adequacy of: compaction levels in
areas that are Judged to be prone to lnadéquat.e compaction
S
, (such. as close to slope faces and at. the fill/bedrock
benches). Si
4.6 Frequencyof Compaction Testi.ng : Tests shall be taken at
intervals-not exceeding 2 feet, in vertica,l r1se and/or 1,00.0
cubic yards of compacted, ,fill soils embankment. In
APPENDIX I Page 7
addition, as a guideline, at least one test shall be taken
on slope faces for each 5,000 square feet of slope face
and/or each 10 feet of vertical height of slope The'
Contractpr shall assure that fill construction. Is such that
the testing schedule can be accomplished by. the Geotechical
Consultant, The Contractor shall stop or slow down the
earthwork construction if these minimum standards are not
met.
Compaction Test Locations : The Geotechnicl Consultant
shall doôument the approximate e1evation and horizontal
coordinates of each test location. The Contractor shall
coordinate with the project surveyor to . assure that
sufficient grade, stakes are established so that the
Geotechnical Consultant can: determine the test locations
with sufficient accuracy. 'lAt: a minimum,' two grade stakes
within a horizontal distance of 100 feet and vertically less
than 5 feet apart from potential test locations shall' be
provided.
.Subdraln Installaltion
-
:Subdrain systems shall be installed in accordance with the
approved geotechincaireport(s), the grading plan, and the
Standard Details. The Geotchnical Consultant' may recommend
additional subdrains and/or changes in . subdrain extent,
location, grade, or material- depending on conditions.
encountered during grading. All subdrains shall be surveyed
by a land Surveyor/civil engineer for line and grade after
installatiQn and prior to burial. Sufficient time should be
allowed by:the Contractor f.r these surveys. .
Excavation
Excavations, as well as over-excavation for remedial
purposes., shall be evaluated by the Geotchnical Consultant
during . grading, Remedial removal depths shown on
geotechnical plans are estimates only. The actual extent of
removal shall be determined by the Geotechnical Consultant
based on' the field.èvaluatlon of exposed conditions durin
grading. Where fill-over-cut slopes are to' be graded, the
Put portion of the slopes shall be made, evaluated, and
accepted by the Geotechnical Consultant prior, to placement
of materials for construction of the fill pOrtion'of the
's1ope,unless otherwise recommended by the. Geotechnical
Consultant.
1 0
APPENDIX I", H Page 8
1.0 Trench'Backfill ' S
1 7.1 The Contractor shall follow all OSHA and Cal/OSHA
I req'uireents for safety of trench excavations.
7.2 All bedding and backfill of utility trenches shall be 'don
-
one
in accordance with the applicable provisions of Standard
- Specifications of Public Works ;Construction. Bedding
material shall have a Sand Equivalent greater than 30
(SE>30). The bedding shall be placed to l. foot over the top
f :the conduit and densified by Jetting. Backfill shall be
placed and densified to a minimum of 90 percent of -maximum -
:'from 1 coot above the top of the conduit to the surface.
7.3 The Jetting of the bedding around the 'conduits shall b
observed by the Geoteôhnical Consultant.
7.. 4 ' The Geotec,hnica]. ::C0flSUltaflt shall test the trench backfill
for relative compaction. At .least one test should be made
} for every 300 feet of trench and 2 feet of fill.
7.5 Lift thickness of trench backfill., shall' not;'exceed those
al lowed in.-: the 'Standard Specifications, of Public Works
I Construction unless the Contractor can demonstrate to the
Geotechnica],. Consultant that the fill lift can be compacted
to the minimum reati,ecóm,aôtion by his alternative
J equipment and method.
It
5,
FINISH GRAD
---------------
-
- - I- - - * - - - - - - - -- - - - - -
- - - - -- - - - -w I- - - - - ---- -
SLOPE - -- - - -_ - - - - - - - -
FACE S..--- - -_ - - - - -- - - - - -' - -
- .5-- - ------5------ - -
--:- :--:—---:--:--: -:-
------------------
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
..-__7
--:---
__
_
ERsrzF-
JTfED OR FLOODED
-- - - .
GRANULAR MATERIAL
-. Oversize rok is larger than 8 inches
in laIgesc dimension.
. Excavate a trench in thel, compacted '.
rill deep enough to bury all the rock <7
is Backfill with granular soil jetted or -
flooded in place to fill all the void:
: Do ncq bury rock within ]O feet of
finish radc.-
Windrow orburied rock shall be -
parallel to the finished slope fill: E LVATION AA'
PROFILE ALONG WINDROW :
)E1TED OR FLOODED
GRANULAR 1VIA1ERt.&L
OVERSIZE ROCK DISPOSAL
Dr-TA iL:B ALLIED EARTH
_____
TECHNOLOGY
lot
NATURAL
GROUND
8EHCH1N0
PAleTElP F44 y:
t
to
o
'
40 ...p.,.ø. ••, ,V•S • V rot,So
I • ••. •. •,• 0 ••• I %,I • I
to
I toe
to
to
h
\
RMQV
—UNSUITABLE
IATeRLAL
2' MIU, OVERLAP FROM THE TOP
\. • HOG tU3 -TIED EYFEET
\
CALTRAN$ CL.ASS U 1
PERMEABLE OH W2 ROOK
(9pj',1fJ9,) 11PpW IN I
FILTER FABRICS, /
FILTER FABRIC
(MM 14OOR
APPROVED ,COLLEQTOR PIPE 6L&LL
EOUIVM.!fli) BE MLH1MUM OLAMETER
CANYON Sc'SDRAIN OUTLET ETAIL PIP9. SES VARVARD
PE
0004 D
D
PERFOR TED PIPE
FOR PIPE $PECIFICA'TION
60 4 MIN.
DESIGN
FINISHED
GRADE 10' MIN. BACKFILL FILTER FABRIG
.•
•••••• < (UIRXF 140 OR
___________________________
APPROVED
0 00 0 EO UWAL!UT),
ft 2Q MIN 0. '1 \H •
V
LONPERORMED_N-I' MINI \tz Roog Wt&PP&
O
IN iu.'r,i -
I '+ MIN, FABRIC OR CALTRANS CLASS II
PERMEAEL!O,
CANYON SUBDRAINS
DETAIL . •
• -.
ALLIED EARTH
• •, TECHNOLOGY
Project No. 00-1 106E4 2 Bergmann 09/01/00
2445 Pio Pico Drive
APPENDIX II
Laboratory Test Results
1. The maximum dry densities and optimum moisture contents of the fill
soils encountered as determined in accordance with A.S.T.M. D1557,
Method A, are presented as follows :r r
Maximum Optimum Moisture
1 Soil Dry Density Content
Descnption (Ibs./cu.ft.) (% DryWt.)
Boring No..1 Brown silty 125.0 11.5
Sample. #1 fine sand
Depth f.5"
2. The Expansion Index of the most clayey soils was determined in
accordance with UBC Test No. 18-2. The results of the test are presented
as follows:
Soil - Expansion
Description Index .
Boring No. 1,-.Brown silty fine sand 35 *
Sampl?#1. ..
Depth 1.5'
.
* Considered to have low expansion potential
UG-15-2.001 WED 04:10 PM CITY OF CARSLBAD FAX NO, 760 602 8558 P. 02
C) City of Carlsbad
I I1Iái.iIIi1U
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
PAYMENT OF SCHOOL FEES OR OTHER MITIGATION
This form must be completed by the City, the applicant, and the appropriate school districts and returned to the City
prior to issuing a building permit. The City will not issue any building permit without a completed school fee form.
Project Name: RENE W & AN1ThBERCMAN RESIDENCE --
Building Permit
Plan Check Number: CB012019
Project Address: 24111 PlO PICO DRIVE
A.P.N.: 156-35.1-18 -.
Project Applicant
(Owner Name): - RENE & ANITA BERGMAN
Project Description: 15 sf single family residence
Building Type: wäod frame
Residential: Number of New Dwelling Units 1
Square Feet of Living Area in New Dwelling 3216 sf
Second Dwelling Unit: Square Feet of Living Area in SDU NA
Residential Additions: Net Square Feet New Area NA
Commercial/Industrial: Square Feet Floor Area
City Certificatioi of
Applicant Information: Date: ,3-/
Carlsbad Unified School District "- San Marcos Unified School District
801 Pine Ave. ', 215 Mata Way
Carlsbad CA 92009 (729-9291) ,/ San Marcos, CA 92069 (736-2200)
Encinitas Union School District San Dieguico Union High School District
101 South Rancho Santa Fe Rd 710 Encinitas Blvd.
Encinitas, CA 92024 (944-4300) Encinitas, CA 92024 (753-6491)
Certification of Applicant/Owners. The person executing this declaration ("Owner') certifies under penalty of perjury that (1) the
information provided above is correct and true to the best of the Owner's knowledge, and that the Owner will file an amended
certification of payment and pay the additional fee if Owner requests an increase in the number of dwelling units or square
footage after the building permit is issued or if the initial determination of units or square footage is found to be incorrect, and
that (2) the Owner is-the owner/developer of the above described project(s), or that the person executing this declaration is
authorized to sign on b If of the Owner.
Signature: Date: 1 0 /zr 01
1636 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad. CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-2700 • FAX (760) 602-8560
i//M
AUC-5-2.O1 WED 04:10 PM CITY OF CRSLBD FAX NO. 760 602 8558 P. 03
SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL FEE CERTIFICATION
(To be completed by the school district(s))
******•W•
THIS FORM INDICATES THAT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROJECT HAVE.
- BEEN OR WILL BE SATISFIED.
SCHOOL DISTRICT:
The undersigned, being duly authorized by the applicable School District, certifies that. the
developer, builder, or owner has satisfied the obligation for school facilities. This is to certify that
the applicant listed on page 1 has paid all amounts or completed other applicable school
mitigation determined by the School District. The City may issue building permits for this proJct.
SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED SCHOOL
DISTRICT OFFICIAL
TITLE
NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT
- 801 Pine Avenue, .. UrIsbad, (alitornja 9200f DATE
PHONE NUMBER
.
City of Carlsbad
Plumbing - Electrical - Mechanical Worksheet
Project Address
Permit No. -U60
Questions below refer to work being done for this permit only.
Plumb in
Number of new or relocated fixtures, traps, or floor drains?
Is
New building sewer line?
Yes No
Number of roof drains?
Install/alter water line? Yes No___
Number of water heaters?
Number of hose bibs?
Gas piping system -
Install Repair
Number of new or relocated gas outlets
No. of _ Size
• New water meter
-.
Potable Irrigation
Electrical
Number of new panels or subpanels?
Size of New Service 2..
Single Phase Size -
Three Phase 0
Three Phase - 480
Remodel (relocate existing outlets/switches or add outlets/switches
Mechanical
Number of furnaces, A/C, or heat pumps?
Number of fireplaces? ..•
Number of exhaust fans?
Number of exhaust hoods?
Number of boilers or compressors?
New or relocated duct work?
Number of-amperes
Number of amperes -
Number of amperes
Yes No_____
2
eL
Number of HP?
Yes No
BEFORE THE PERMIT CAN BE FEE'D OUT THIS FORM NEEDS T
O
B
E
R
E
T
U
R
N
E
D
T
O
T
H
E
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
DEPARTMENT - FAX NUMBER (760) 602-8558