The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2470 FARADAY AVE | 6200 EL CAMINO REAL; ; CB990998; PermitCity of Carlsbad 05/17/1999 Commercial/Industrial Permit Permit No: CB990998 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 438-3101 Job Address: 2470 FARADAY AV CBAD Permit Type: Tl Sub Type: COMM Parcel No: Lot#: 0 Valuation: $150,000.00 Construction Type: NEW Occupancy Group: Project Title: BECKMAN COULTER Applicant: SMITH CONSUL TING ARCHITECTS STE 200 12220 EL CAMINO REAL SAN DIEGO CA 92121 619 673 4777 Reference #: Owner: Status: Applied: Entered By: Plan Approved: Issued: Inspect Area: ISSUED 03/15/1999 JM 05/17/1999 05/17/1999 Total Fees: $1,577.53 II r-Tbtal P~yfnents1,o-pate: ""~$520.0Q\-~ O Balaoce Due: $1,057.53 I 0~ / Ff'{\f'-\"' Y---\ I ./"",. ' / 't:--. -. ----_,.__,,-_,.,,\ ""< ,-. ) \ I c...~)· f '"~~~::::::::::::-----z \ (/ \ Building Permit n_ ,)) ( $796.0 ·····,,,.::.e~l .. ,Water Coni'.'.'.f;~ef-:~~~\ I, Add'I Building Permit Fee i ~./ , $0.Q.9 . f-1~te1,sffe __ .,/:E j I \8' Plan Check \ I $517.fl-F.;/J 1Aad;!7Recl'."Water €0n. Fee \ \ °" "-1. Ii A ft{ ' ~ l /..."r::S.~;,, ' Add'I Plan Check Fee \ \ ,-$0:gct~[ · 1 <P:'Flf PaY,@ffJ,~e / Plan Check Discount \ \ "'$-9.00-..... ~ff JJ 'h 1 Strong Motion Fee \ \$31:!JO/ r ,~~j§_ED,Pund)/ / Park Fee \ '-~O::QP \ bieense Tax L _ / LFM Fee \ -~cv $0,00 INCORli'(jl~iW,'e Tax,{CF@ J?und) / \ 1, -... 1\;il;,: / "'> , v ,.,...-1 Bridge Fee , '--.::: ,,,,.,,~O.QO'----_J[§ftic.Impactff~':"J~ BTD #2 Fee , ~v'io1.00 7 Traffic.lmA8-"cfc>(CED Fund) \.,$ r 1 1 r::::; ,-,.:;:;., , .;::,, 1 ';\~ l r BTD #3 Fee QJQ0t 1 ;5 1~FN.1Z\ rr~ns~ortati<?,P,Fee Renewal Fee , $0:odJ u \pL~BlNG TOTAL Add'I Renewal Fee $'0:00._ ECECTRJCAt'TOTAL Other Building Fee $0.00 ----MECRANICAL TOTAL Pot. Water Con. Fee $0.00 Master Drainage Fee: Meter Size Sewer Fee: Add'I Pot. Water Con. Fee $0.00 TOTAL PERMIT FEES Inspector: ffe-FINAL APPROVAL Date: /#iz.rA, Clearance: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $48.00 $110.00 $74.50 $0.00 $0.00 $1,577.53 NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "Imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as 'foes/exactions." You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capactiy changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which vou have oreviouslv been aiven a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has oreviouslv otherwise exoired. CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (760) 438-1161 02 1057-53 v'10'1 roq-v-- PERM1T APPLICATION FOR OFFICE USE ONLY a& t0 PLAN CHECK NO. C/11_-I V CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad CA 92009 (760) 438-1161 EST. VAL. LSi:>JIU!J Plan Ck. Deposi_:_t =~-::-------- Validated;:SY=·•· . .;.,. ~u..;i~..,....~~~H'?T-:; Date ______ .,___---'--=-H---..,_...,......., Name Address . ,Qi\~nt 'tJF:"c911ttact3tliD. ow~;Ji X City State/Zip Telephone# Fax# (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law [Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code] or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars [$500]). G~ 4-~ (oqo Jos#UA WA:i ,Vl-s'Ik CA . (Z6o 1 ,sff--?c.1v Name Address I City State/Zip -felephone # State License # ]2?S, fQ License Class jJ -1 City Business License # _______ _ Designer Name Address City State/Zip Telephone State License # _________ _ Jlji'':ti:Bft&n-~Otitpqj(tlON4fllttrt>-·•·•. . '''t/~~'e:1. Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: .W-I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. 0 I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Insurance Company_____________________ Policy No._____________ Expiration Date _______ _ (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($100] OR LESS) D CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000 in addition to he cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees. SIGNATURE __ ~l....,.,4.CiiGl4~~====--------------, f:-/ 7-99 \111\i\(i)'VN~"lwt~R;.¢1.:Aij'A'Tii-· ",:.,, I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: 0 I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). 0 I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(sl licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). 0 I am exempt under Section ______ Business and Professions Code for this reason: 1. I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. 0 YES ONO 2. I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. 3. I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): 4. I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone number/ contractors license number): ________________________________________________ _ 5. I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name/ address / phone number/ type of work): __________________________________________________________ _ Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? .,..:K(' YES D NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? D YES ,J2/ NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? D YES~ NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. lllliliiiif~~N~JI-Qf~'ll,,GIIIN~~Y:t:.,..P,?/ ·. ;;;q 1 · I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097(i) Civil Code). I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the Citt of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excav tions over EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the uilding work authorized by such permit is not or abandoned at any time after the w APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. r the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or 5 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended a period of 180 days (Section 106.4.4 Uniform Building Code). DATE PINK: Finance ,. . City of Carlsbad Inspection Request For: 1 0/21 /99 Permit# CB990998 Title: BECKMAN COULTER Description: Inspector Assignment: TP Type:TI Job Address: Sub Type: COMM Suite: Location: 2470 FARADAY AV Lot 0 Phone: 7607448866 Inspector: ..,£2___ APPLICANT SMITH CONSUL TIN.G ARCHITECTS Owner: BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS INC Remarks: AM PLEASE -MADE REQUEST TUESDAY Total Time: CD 19 29 39 49 Description Final Structural Final Plumbing Final ·Electrical Final Mechanical Act Comments Requested By: J.P. JONES Entered By: CHRISTINE _JL _________ _ t-·-- Inspection History Date Description Act lnsp Comments 9/28/99 89 Final Combo PA TP DRY RM. ONLY, OK TO OCCUPY 8/5/99 12 Steel/Bond Beam AP DH LOG -ON PLANS 7/21/99 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding AP TP T-BAR CEIL RM 110 7/21/99 24 Rough/Topout WC TP 7/21/99 34 Rough Electric AP TP CEIL LITES RM 110 7/21/99 44 Rough/Ducts/Dampers AP TP -DUCTS RM 110 7/2/99 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding co TP RM 110 & 109 SEE NOTICE 7/6/99 17 Interior Lath/Drywall AP PS 103 & 109 RMS 7/6/99 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall WC PS 7/2/99 34 Rough Electric AP TP RM 109 CEIL 7/2/99 44 Rough/Ducts/Dampers AP TP 6/29/99 34 Rough Electric AP TP RM 103 6/29/99 44 Rough/Ducts/Dampers AP TP DUCTS, PLMNS RM 103 5/28/99 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding AP TP H3,H7, CONTROL AREA 1 6/1/99 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding CA TP COMPLETED ON 5/28 5/28/99 17 Interior Lath/Drywall AP TP @ H3,H7, WASH RM, 1 HR SOFFIT WALL 5/28/99 17 Interior Lath/Drywall AP TP F.C. @ 1 HR SOFFIT WALL 5/19/99 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding AP DH WALL TO ROOF, WASH RM ... City of Carlsbad Inspection Request For: 1 0/21 /99 Permit# CB990998 Inspector Assignment: TP 5/19/99 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding AP DH REINF@ ROOF FOR NEW HVAC UNITS 5/19/99 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding AP DH 1 HR FULL HT WALL, SHAFT WALL 5/19/99 23 Gas/Test/Repairs AP DH 5/19/99 34 Rough Electric AP DH WALL TO ROOF, WASH RM. 5/19/99 34 Rough Electric AP DH 1 HR FULL HT WALL, SHAFT WALL Gitt of Carlsbad · Final Building Inspection Dept: Building Engineering Planning CMWD St Litec:F-ire~~ Plan Check#: Date: 9/28/99 Permit#: CB990998 Permit Type: Tl Project Name: BECKMAN COULTER Sub Type: COMM Address: 24 70 FARADAY AV Lot: 0 Contact Person: JP JONES Phone: 7607143677 Sewer Dist: Water Dist: ·························································································································································· Inspected a l?J)_ {hJ{_ Date /0 / I °I/ 91 Approved: X By: -. Inspected: Disapproved: __ Inspected Date By: Inspected: Approved: Disapproved: __ Inspected Date By: Inspected: Approved: Disapproved: __ Comments: _____________________________ _ .,,_ I DATE: 5/13/99 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 99-998 EsGil Corporation 1n Partnersliip witli qovernment for '13uiufing Safetg SET: III PROJECT ADDRESS: 2470 Faraday Ave. Bldg. #1 PROJECT NAME: Beckman Coulter T.I. D APPLICANT ~ D PLAN REVIEWER D FILE D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. ~ The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified in the attached list are resolved and ·checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. D The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. D The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: D Es~il Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. ~ Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Mark Langan (..J.~J Telephone#: 793-4777 Date contacted: S'{ I ~1'7'7(by: (c.-) Fax #: Mail Telephone V Fax In Person ~ REMARKS: 1. The applicant hand carried the approved plan back to city.(O.K. per Mr.Peterson) 2. Only one set of the plan was submitted to Esgil Corp. By: David Yao Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC log trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (619) 560-1468 + Fax (619) 560-1576 ' . . , . ~~ ,-... ~ ~ . ~ . .·, ,-.. ---. -.·· T",-: Carlsbad 99-998 III 5/13/99 ~ 1. The~ i "r stated that city will consider the accessible bathrooms located be~ grid line 5-6 and D-E adequate to serve the remodel area. Please 2. 4. verify. The designer stated that city will consi adequate by providing doors 107,108 exits from H3/H7 area are 10 only. Please verify. City to verify the path of travel from the handicapped parking space to the remodel area comply with all the current disabled access requirements. nH-'11~\ierify the bathrooms between grid line 5-6 and D-E comply with all the WrVntdisabled access requirements. _ f The designer stated that city will allow the existing opening for conveyor system through the control area separation wall. Please verify. 6t)\// The designer stated that city will allow defered approval for all the requirements in H3/H7 area. Please verify. ··~·,~,.~,··· ... ,,., -·-,,_,,•,-;..:·•.,~·.,•"'i~,.!-;1~· ,,~1:,··~·· , •'''· .' ~·, ,, DATE: 4/30/99 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 99-998 EsGil Corporation 'l.n Partners/ii]! witli (jovernment for '13uiMing Safety SET: II PROJECT ADDRESS: 2470 Faraday Ave. Bldg #1 PROJECT NAME: Beckman Coulter T.I. 0 APPLICANT ~ D PLAN REVIEWER D FILE D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially cqmply with the jurisdiction's building codes. D The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building d.epartment staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. C8:I The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. C8:I The applicant's copy of the check list has been fax to: Mark Langan 793-4 787 C8:I Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed . .. D Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone#: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax#: Mail Telephone Fax In Person D REMARKS: By: David Yao Enclosures: Esgil Corporation IZJ GA IZJ MB D EJ D PC 4/20 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (619) 560-1468 + Fax (619) 560-1576 Carlsbad 99-998 II 4/30/99 RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 99-998 ;. PROJECT ADDRESS: 2470 Faraday Ave. Bldg # 1 SET: II DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 4/20 REVIEWED BY: David Yao FOREWORD (PLEASE READ}: DATE RECHECK COMPLETED: 4/30/99 This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The foll_owing items listed need clarification, modification or change._ All items _m_ust be satisfied before the plans will be in conforrl"!ance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1994 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. A. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints to: ESGIL CORPORATION. B. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. C. The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews. The original correction number has been given for your reference. In case you did not keep a copy of the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding corrections. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items. D. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? DYes DNo T Carlsbad 99-998 II 4/30/99 7. The designer stated that_.the bathrooms between grid line 5-6 and D-E are accessible. City will consider these accessible bathrooms adequate to serving the remodel area. Please verify. i. 9. The designer stated that city will consider the exit system from new H3/H7 are adequate by providing doors 107,108 and 110. Please verify. • REMODELS, ADDITIONS AND REPAIRS 1. When alterations, structural repairs or modifications or additions are made to an existing building, that building, or portion of the building affected is required to comply with all of the requirements for new buildings, per Section 1134B.2. These requirements apply only to the area of sp~cific alteration, repair or. addition and shall include: a) A primary entrance to the building and the primary path of travel to the area in question, and include the following items which serye the area in question: Show a path of travel from the existing handicapped parking space to the remodel area. i) Sanitary facilities. ii) Drinking fountains. + PLUMBING, MECHANICAL AND ENERGY CORRECTIONS + PLAN REVIEWER: Glen Adamek 3. Clearly show the construction of the required Control area fire separations. Provide details of the existing construction to provide the requireq_ one-hour separation. a) Correct the Key Note #19 on sheet A 1 (The existing opening is not allowed in the required Control area fire sep~ration wall). b) Provide data to show the windows in the required Control area fire separation wall are listed and labeled to be one-hour fire-rate, on sheets A1 an A2. · 6. Show the required ceiling rated fire dampers for the duct opening in the fire rated ceiling membranes. UBC, Section 713.11. a) Clearly show the required fire-rated separations between each of the separate H-3 and/9r H-7 rooms .. b) Show the existing HVAC equipment and required ceiling rated fire dampers. Carlsbad 99-998 II 4/30/99 PLUMBING (1997 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE) 7. Provide complete gas line plans and calculations. Show the gas line sizes (existing and new) from the gas meter to the to tj,e new gas fixtures. Clearly show gas meter location, gas pressures, gas demands, and developed pipe lengths. MECHANICAL (1997 UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE) 9. In the Technical Report by Eriksen-Rattan Associates Inc. provide data on proposed hazardous material to be stored and used as per the following. USC and UFC. The Technical Report by Eriksen-Rattan Associates Inc. does not address the H-occupancies uses room by room, and the plans do not label each room by use and number each separate room to make clear the operations in each area. a) Provide a written response to show how Spill Control and Drainage are being handled as required in USC, Section 307.2.4. N·o permits for the H-occupancy areas can be reviewed without the Spill Control, Drainage, and Containment being addressed. b) c) d) i) Please address the required 4 inch concrete at all walls for each H- occupancy room requiring Spill Control. ii) Please address how sprinkler water and spilled materials are prevented from flowing under doors and through doorways for each H-occupancy room requiring Spill Control. (Curbs or trench drains at the doors.) Provide calculations for required containment in each area of the buildings, as per USC, Sections 307.2.4.1.2 & 307.2.4.2.2. No permits for the H-occupancy areas can be reviewed without the Spill Control, Drainage, and Containment being addressed. Prpvide the-required manual shutoff control for ventilation equipment as per USC, Section 1202.2.3. The mechanical plans do not show the required 'Break-glass type switches, and the required labeling. Also, the plans do not show the required ventilation and controls for each of the rooms under the second floor level storage area· in the H-2/H-7 area. Please correct. The electrical plans do not show the required Standby power for H-3 occupancy as per USC Section 307.2.6 and Emergency power H-7 occupancy as per USC, Section 307.2.7. Please correct. 10. Provide mechanical plans showing all existing and proposed HVAC equipment, ·· ducts and access to equipment._ The note "_Existing Equipment to Remain" does not show the smoke and fire dampers, ducts, exhaust systems, and HVAC equipment sizes, types, and locations. Please correct. Carlsbad 99-998 II 4/30/99 11. Correct the Sheet M3.4_to show the required smoke and fire dampers for duct openings in the fire rated control area separations. 12. Show the required fire rated occupancy· separations between the separate H-3/H-7 occupancy rooms. Also, show the required smoke and fire dampers at duct openings. 16. A complete mechanical plan review will be done when complete mechanical plans are provided. ENERGY CONSERVATION 20. The plans show not existing heating and/or cooling in the area of the new Clean Room. If this is so this is new conditioned space and enveloped design (ENV-1, ENV-2 and ENV-3 forms) are required for the proposed change in the envelope. Please correct. Provide complete energy designs for the proposed changes in envelope. 21. On the plans clearly show the wall and roof insulation locations, thickness, and R-values, as per the energy design. At the new Clean Room. 22. Correct the lighting controls on sheet E1 to show the required bi-level lighting controls as per Title 24, Part 6, Section 131 (b ). 24. The completed and signed ENV-1, L TG-1, and MECH-1 forms must be imprinted on the plans. 25. The Documentation Author and the Principal Envelope Designer must sign the completed ENV-1 forms on sheet M1 .1. See Item# 20 above. 27. The Documentation Author and the Principal Mechanical Designer must sign the completed MECH.:1 forms on sheet M1 .1. 28. Complete energy plan check will be done when complete corrected energy designs are provided. Note: If you have any questions regarding this plumbing, mechanical and energy plan review list please contact Glen Adamek at (619) 560-1468. To speed the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans. + ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW + 1993 NEC + PLAN REVIEWER: MORTEZA BEHESHTI ., Carlsbad 99-998 II 4/30/99 12. Demonstrate compliance in Hazardous/classified locations. NEC 500 PLEASE SHOW SOURCE OF EMERGENCY POWER FORH7 OCCUPANCY AND STANDBY POWER REQUIRED FOR H3 OCCUPANCY. Note: If you have any questions regarding this electrical plan review list please contact Morteza Beheshti at (619) 560-1468. To speed the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans. DATE: 3/30/99 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 99-998 EsGil Corporation 2n Partnersliip witli (jovemment for '.BuiUing Safety SET:I PROJECT ADDRESS: 2470 Faraday Ave. Bldg #1 PROJECT NAME: Beckman Coulter T.I. D APPLICANT ~ D PLAN REVIEWER D FILE D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. 0 The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. 0 The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. r;g) The check lis·t transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. 0 · The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forw~rd to the applicant contact person. r;g) The applicant's copy of the check list has been fax to: Mark Langan 793-4 787 ~ Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been compl_eted. D Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone#: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax#: Mail Telephone Fax In Person D REMARKS: By: David Yao Enclosures: Esgil Corporation [?g GA [?g MB D EJ D PC 3/18 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (619) 560-1468 + Fax (619) 560-1576 Carlsbad 99-998 3/30/99 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST TENANT IMPROVEMENTS PLAN CHECK NO.: 99-998 OCCUPANCY: H3/H7 /S2/Fl/F2 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA: ? SPRINKLERS?: Y REMARKS: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED: 3/30/99 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): JURISDICTION: Carlsbad USE: manufacture ACTUAL AREA: STORIES: 2 HEIGHT: OCCUPANT LOAD: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 3/18 PLAN REVIEWER: David Yao This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Code sections cited are based on the 1994 USC. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1994 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. LIST NO. 40, TENANT IMPROVEMENTS WITHOUT SPECIFIC ENERGY DATA OR POLICY SUPPLEMENTS (1994UBC) tiforw.dot Carlsbad 99-998 3/30/99 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints, to: Esgil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite #208, San Diego, CA 92123, (619) 560-1468. 2. Plans shall be signed and sealed by the California state licensed engineer or architect where there are structural changes to existing buildings or structural additions. Please include the California license number, seal, date of license expiration and date plans are signed. Business and Professions Code. 3. Provide a statement on the Title Sheet of the plans that this project shall comply with Title 24 and 1997 USC, UMC and UPC and 1996 NEC.(per the technical report?) 4. On the first sheet of the plans indicate: • Present and proposed occupancy classifications of the remodel area, (Why the manufacture area is F-2 (noncombustible material?) 5. Show any existing fire rated area separation walls, occupancy separation walls, demising walls, shafts or rated corridors on the floor plan. 6. A complete description of the activities and processes that will occur in this tenant space should be provided. Section 307.1.6. · 7. The tenant space and new and/or existing facilities serving the remodeled area must be accessible to and functional for the physically disabled. See the attached correction sheet. Title 24, Part 2. 8. A 1-hour occupancy separation is required between S-2occupancy and the H-3 occupancy. Table 3-8.(The roll up wall shall be 1 hr too. City to approve using the water curtain in lieu of 1 hr door.) 9. Every portion of a H occupancy having a floor area of 200 square feet or more shall have two exits USC 1007.4.1 (The wash room 111 has one exit only.) 10. Exits should have a minimum separation of one-half the maximum overall diagonal dimension of the building or area served. Section 1003.3. 11. The maximum number of required exits and their required separation must be maintained until egress is provided from the structure. Section 1003.1. 12. All doors and gates, within the exit path from Group H-3 occupancy to a public way, shall not be provided with latches or locks unless they are equipped with panic hardw~re. Chapter 10. J Carlsbad 99-998 3/30/99 • CITY OF CARLSBAD SUPPLEMENT 1. Roof mounted equipment must be screened and roof penetrations should be minimized (City Policy 80-6). 2. No wiring is permitted on the roof of a building and wiring on the exterior of a building requires approval by the Building Official. (City Policy) 3. All roof-mounted equipment shall be concealed from view. Provide structural detailing for the screening. 4. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92009, (760) 438-1161. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (619) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing· to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. • MISCELLANEOUS 13. Please refer to the following corrections for mechanical, plumbing, energy and electrical items. 14. Provide calculation to show the masonry dike at detail 24/A3 is adequate to resist the proper load. 15. Specify ICBO approval number for the Redhead anchor. Special inspection? If require special inspection , provide inspection program to the building official. 16. To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. l Carlsbad 99-998 3/30/99 17. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: Yes D No D The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 619/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding-these plan review items, please contact David Yao at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. + PLUMBING, MECHANICAL AND ENERGY CORRECTIONS + PLAN ·REVIEWER: Glen Adamek 1. On sheet T2 the plans show "All work shall conform to the USC 1994 Edition, UPC and UMC 1997 Editions, OSHAA 1997 Edition, and NEC 1997 Edition." The Technical Report, Building 1, Hazardous Materials Operations for Beckman- Coulter, Uniform Codes Analysis is based on the 1997 Uniform Building Code & 1997 Uniform Fire Code, but the City of Carlsbad is enforcing the 1994 Uniform Building Code & 1994 Uniform Fire Code. Obtain approval for the City of Carlsbad Building Official and the Fire-Department for using the 1997 Editions of the USC, UMC, UPC, and UFC. Also, there is not 1997 NEC (The City of Carlsbad is using the 1993 NEC). Note the plans are being reviewed under the 1997 Editions of the use, UMC, UPC, & UFC. 2. As per USC, Section 306.1 Division 2. The proposed Class 11, Ill-A and III-B Combustible Liquids may not be produced, packaged, or stored iri the F-2 Occupancy areas. The proposed Class II, Ill-A and 11I-B Combustible Liquids are not Non-combustibles. Note the UFC, Section 7901.1.1 Exception 9 does not allow the packaging of the combustible liquids "having no fire point when tested in accordance with UFC Standard 2-6." To use the Excepting 9 of UFC, Section 7901.1.1 please provide the following: a) Provide the test data or the MSDS showing the "having no fire point when tested in accordance with UFC Standard 2-6." b) Clearly show only "Storage of liquids that have no fire point when tested in accordance with UFC Standard 2-3." No use, filling or packaging of the combustible liquids "having no fire point." 3. Clearly show the construction of the required Control area fire separations. I Carlsbad 99-998 3/30/99 4. As per UBC, Section 1005.3.4.4: a) "Openings into exit passageways shall be limited to those necessary from normally occupied spaces into the exit passageway and those necessary for egress from the exit passageway." b) "Penetrations into or through an exit passageway are prohibited except for those serving the exit passageway such as sprinkler piping, Standpipes and electrical conduit termination in a listed box not exceeding 16 square inches in area." 5. On the plans clearly show the limits of the required fire rated corridors. 6. Show the required ceiling rated fire dampers for the duct opening in the fire rated ceiling membranes. UBC, Section 713.11. PLUMBING (1997 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE) 7. Provide con:,plete plumbing plans, including: a) Complete drain, waste and vent plans. b) Provide gas line plans and calculations, showing pipe lengths and gas demands. UPC Section 1217.0 c) Provide complete water line sizing calculations, including the water pressure, pressure losses, water demands, and developed pipe lengths. UPC Section 610.0 d) Show water heater size, type and location on plans. UPC, Section 501.0 8. A complete plumbing plan review will be done when the complete plumbing plans are provided. 9. In the Technical Report by Eriksen-Rattan Associates Inc. provide data on proposed hazardous material to be stored and used as per the following. UBC and UFC. a) Provide a written response to show how Spill Control and Drainage are being handled as required in UBC, Section 307.2.4. b) Provide calculations for required containment in each area of the buildings, as per UBC, Sections 307.2.4.1.2 & 307.2.4.2.2. c) Provide the required two exits in each H-occupancy area over 200 square feet in floor area, as per UBC, Section 1007.4.1. d) Provide the required manual shutoff control for ventilation equipment as per UBC, Section 1202.2.3. e) For fumes or vapors that are heavier than air, exhaust shall be taken from a poin_t within 12 inches of the floor. UFC, Art. 8003.18.2-5. l Carlsbad 99-998 3/30/99 MECHANICAL (1997 UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE) 10. Provide mechanical plans showing all existing and proposed HVAC equipment, ducts and access to equipment. 11. On the mechanical plans clearly show the limits of the required fire rated control area separations and required fire and smoke dampers. 12. On the mechanical plans clearly show the limits of the required fire rated occupancy separations and the required fire and smoke dampers. 13. On the mechanical plans clearly show the limits of the required fire rated corridors and the required fire and smoke dampers. 14. On the mechanical plans clearly show the limits of the fire rated exit passageways. 15. Detail required roof access ladder to roof mounted HVAC equipment. UMC, Section 307 .5. 16. A complete mechanical plan review will be done when complete mechanical plans are provided. 17. Detail disposal sites of main condensate drainage frorri air conditioning units. UMC Section 309.3. 18. Detail tt-le disposal sites of the overflow, blowdown and service drains from evaporative coolers or air washer and cooling· towers as per UMC, Section 309.4. 19. The equipment which has a flame, generates· a spark or uses a glowing ignition source open to the space in which it is installed shall not be installed in Group H Occupancies or control areas where open use, handling or dispensing of combustible, flammable or explosive materials occurs. UMC, Section 303.1.3. l:NERGY CONSERVATION 20. Provide complete energy designs for the proposed changes in envelope, lighting, and mechanical systems. Provide the completed ENV-1, ENV-2, ENV-3, L TG-1, L TG-2, MECH-1, MECH-2, MECH-3, and MECH-4 forms showing energy compliance. 21. On the plans clearly show the wall and roof insulation locations, thickness, and R-values, as per the energy design. Carlsbad 99-998 3/30/99 22. Show bi-level lighting controls as per Title 24, Part 6, Section 131 (b). 23. Show the daylit areas and required daylit area lighting controls for lighting in daylit areas. Title 24, Part 6, Section 131 (c). 24. The completed and signed ENV-1, L TG-1, and· MECH-1 forms must be imprinted on the plans. 25. The Documentation Author and the Principal Envelope Designer must sign the ENV-1 form. 26. The Documentation Author and the Principal Lighting Designer must sign the LTG-1 form. 27. The Documentation Author and the Principal Mechanical Designer must sign the MECH-1 form. 28. Complete energy plan check will be done when complete corrected energy designs are provided. Note: If you have any questions regarding this Plumbing, Mechanical, and Energy plan review list please contact Glen Adamek at (619) 560-1468. To speed the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans. · + ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW + 1993 NEC + PLAN REVIEWER: MORTEZA BEHESHTI 1. On sheet E1 indicate the 75 KVA transformer and panels LB and X1 as existing or new. (More corrections may follow) 2. Provide grounding electrode for new panels at separate building. NEC250-24 3. Show the available fault current (lsc) at the existing 800 amp bus duct. 4. Show the ampere interrupting capacity (AIC) ratings of the new equipment. NEC 110-9, 230-65. 5. Show or note on the plans the method used to limit faults currents to 10,000 amps on branch circuits. 6. Show or identify new loads proposed for the existing equipment. ,. Carlsbad 99-998 3/30/99 7. Indicate the bus duct total load demand. 8. Specify the wiring method you intend to use for this project (i.e., EMT, Metal Flex, NMC etc.). 9. Show on the plan the location·of the service(s) NEC 110-16, 230-2. 10. Submit complete panel schedules for panels LOH and LDL. 11. On sheet T2, change the NEC code cycle date from 1997 to 1993. 12. Demonstrate compliance in Hazardous/classified locations. NEC 500 Note: If you have any questions regarding this electrical plan review list please contact Morteza Beheshti at (619) 560-1468. To speed the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans. DEPARTMENT OF STATE ARCHITECT NON RESIDENTIAL TITLE 24 DISABLED ACCESS REQUIREMENTS • REMODELS, ADDITIONS AND REPAIRS 1. When alterations, structural repairs or modifications or additions are made to an existing building, that building, or portion of the building affected is required to comply with all of the requirements for new buildings, per Section 11348.2. These requirements apply only to the area of specific alteration, repair or addition and shall include: a) A primary entrance to the building and the primary path of travel to the area in question, and include the following items which serve the area in question: Show a path of travel from the existing handicapped parking space to the remodel area. i) Sanitary facilities. ii) Drinking fountains. END OF DOCUMENT Carlsbad 99-998 3/30/99 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 99-998 PREPARED BY: David Yao DATE: 3/30/99 BUILDING ADDRESS: 2470 Faraday Ave. Bldg #1 BUILDING OCCUPANCY: H2/H3/S2/Fl/F2 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V-N . BUILDING PORTION BUILDING AREA VALUATION VALUE (ft. 2) MULTIPLIER ($) T.I. Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers 150000 TOTAL VALUE (per city) D 199 UBC Building Permit Fee ~ Bldg. Permit Fee by ordinance: $ 796.08 D 199 UBC Plan Check Fee ~ Plan Check Fee by ordinance: $ 517.45 Type of Review: D Complete Review D Structural Only D Hourly D Repetitive Fee Applicable D Other: Esgil Plan Review Fee: Comments: $ 413.96 Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue.doc 5196 . ' . ~ .. May 11, 1999 BECKMAN COULTER Mike Peterson City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Carlsbad, CA 92009 As per recent discussions with Mark Langan of Smith Consulting Architects, Beckman Coulter Inc. requests deferral of the plan check for the H3/H7 area and associat~d containment, plan check # 99-998. Plans for this area will be submitted separately. A~ f\ 0Ji.-,.. \Jim Williams Plant Engineering Manager ** TOTAL PAGE.02 ** ,-age I ot I ERIKSEN-RATTAN ASSOCIATES INC. 8989 Rio San Diago Drive -Suite 200, San Diego, California 92108-1648 Telephone (619)299-6444 FAX (619)299-1229 EMAIL: erai@eciti.com tf##IWSMP&R ilii##iii5&AA¥ &¥WM 6-4 ¥fu¥&E&#A&b4?!49H&+AA¥¥ &, FAX To: cc: RE: Mark Langon/SCA Todd Torgerson/BC Beckman -Conveyor Opening Between F1 & F2 Occupancy lAA&MfPSELHHH: The comments below are sort of "thinking out loud" thoughts --give me a call if my "logic" is not understood. I am hesitant to simply make a statement that an unprotected opening between the F1 /8 & F2 occupancy areas is not a problem, even though the opening is relatively small [44 si, with 18 si conveyor assembly--unclear if the unprotected opening is the 44 si or just the 18 si]. The Beckman condition is somewhat different than an unprotected opening in a Control Area separation that was apparently previously allowed by tt1e City of Carlsbad. The reason that the "issue" is different is because the "new'' F2 occupancy Control Area is not allowed to have any nammable/combustible materials, whereas the "existing" B/F1 occupancy Control Area can and does have such materials. Also, I believe that the "original" Control Area separation was for health hazard materials and was not related to needing more than 1 Control Area for combustible and flammable materials. However, the only ,;flammables/combustibles" shown in the current inventory for "existing" Control Area 1 [F1/B Occupancy] appear to be located in the liquid formulation lab. The liquid formulation lab is located on the opposite side of the building from the drying room where the conveyor opening is located, and the liquid formulation room is also part of the "existing" Control Area 1. If this is the situation [that all "flammables/combustibles" in "existing" Control Area 1 are located in the liquid formulation lab], the unprotected conveyor opening between the "new" F2 Occupancy and the "existing" Fi Occupancy drying room is really a "non-issue" as there is no exposure hazard to the F2 area from the F1 area. If the situation is other than described above, the unprotected opening could most likely still be justified if there are [or will be] no flammables/combustibles in the drying rooms. ("Flammat)les/Comlx1stibles" refers to flammable or combustible hazarcloLIs materials --i.e.: Class I Flammable Liquids, Class II & Ill-A Combustible Liquids, Flammable Gases, Water Reactives 2 & 3, Organic Peroxides I-IV, etc.] Ht:CEIVED-- .,_ n, Ar BECKMAN COULTER Mark Langon Smith Consulting Architects · 12220 El Camino :Real Suite 200 San Diego, Ca., 92130 ',bti 4.Jti b4S7 fO '316197934787 P.02/02 5/10/99 Re: Drv Room 3 (Three) Materials Per our telephone discussion this morning: flammable/combustible materials are not stored or used in Dry Room 3 (three). Sincerely, Todd Torgerson Environmental Specialist Beckman Coulter, Jnc. Beckman Coulter, Inc. Car!SbHd Reagent Operation 2470 F!l,l'aday Ave. Carlsbad Ca, 92008 ** TOTAL F'AGE. 132 :+:;t: ... ·.<;;,:.:.:·./ ··7} ~->" . ERIKSEN-RATTAN ASSOCIATES INC. 8989 Rio San Diego Drive -Suite 200, San Diego, California 92108-1648 Telephone (619)299-6444 FAX (619)299-1229 EMAIL: erai@eciti.com FAX To: Mark Lango11/SCA cc: Glen Adamek/Esgil Todd Torgerson/Beckman RE: Esgil Plan Review Carlsbad 99-998 11 ·-Beckman Building 1 -H3/H7 Area 1 Date: 5-5-99 # of Pages From: 1 MARY RATTAN The following information is provided in response to 5-5-99 telephone discussions with Glen Adamek/Esgil Corporation and Mark Langon/Smith Consulting Architects concerning the above-referenced project. References to the "Technical Report" refer to the 3/6/99 report with 4/21/99 revisions prepared by Eriksen-Rattan Associates Inc. For the Beckman Building 1 project. 1. Incompatible Hazardous Materials: All materials that will be located within the Building 1 H3/H7 Area 1 are compatible with each other. The compatibility of materials is represented in the Technical Report in two [2) ways: o Hazardous materials inventory information provided in Attachment 2 of the Technical Report. e The absence of any requirements for separation of incompatible materials in the "Code Conditions & Requirements" portion of the Technical Report. Generally, Code conditions/requirements that do not apply are not included in a report unless there is a specific need to clarify ''why". 2. Location of Hazardous Materials in H3/H7 Area 1: Section 2.3 on page 4 of the Technical Report states that "All hazardous materials will be located in the tank containment and filling areas." Note that this same condition is also indicated in the report for H3/H7 Area 2. Ht:CEIVED . '\" v 5 1999 SMITIT CONSULT/NG ARCHITECTS ·--- < .. -.. '..j>~/' . ./ ERIKSEN-RATTAN 8989 Rio San Diego Drive -Suite 200, San Diego, California 92108-1648 ASSOCIATES INC. Telephone (619)299-6444 FAX (619)299-1229 EMAIL: erai@eciti.com ~AA¾,AAAA~P.fidfAMMi/W'4ti#AAA#lt¥8t8$¥tl#a/FWfflWSJ'#AAW"iHitt¾t~~;.w;itiMN@-ffe&i¥;R#tt~~ FAX To: Mark Langon/SCA cc: Glen Adamek/Esgil RE: Esgil Plan Review Carlsbad 99-998 II -Beckman 4-30-99 Mech Correction 6 2~J c=:::;:~;-;::J The following comments represent my understanding of my 5-5-99 telephone conversation with Glen Adamek concerning the above-referenced project. The comments specifically relate to the "H3/H7" area in what has been referred to as "existing Building 1 ". · 1. Occupancy separation is not required to separate "H3/H7" rooms/areas from other "H3/H7" rooms/areas in the Building 1 "H3/H7" area. 2. Fire-rated separations are not required between each of the separate H-3 and/or H-7 rooms in the Building 1 "H3/H7" area. 3. Ceiling rated fire dampers for duct openings in the fire-rated ceiling membranes are not required, unless the fire- rated ceiling membranes form part of the required occupancy separation between the "H3/H7" areas and other occupancies otherwise classified [i.e.: F, Sor B Occupancies]. 4. Exhaust ventilation must be provided throughout the "H3/H7" area, which includes exhaust ventilation for all rooms/areas that are located within the boundary of the "H3/H7" occupancy --i.e.: 1 cfm per sf exhaust ventilation, with at least 1 low-level pick-up located within 12" of the lowest point of the room, or alternate method of compliance that has been specifically approved by the City of Carlsbad [as indicated in the Technical Report]. Plans reviewed by Esgil did not provide sufficient information to show compliance with applicable Code requirements. · ' .,, : ' Kt::CEIVED :·-i fl.'' ll H 1990 I '1,-•\ i _, " '-j ~\TH. CONSULTING V ARCHITECTS -=----=~ SmithConsu tingArchitectE April 20, 1999 Mr. David Yao ESGIL CORPORATION 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 San Diego, California 92123 Re: Plancheck 99-998 Beckman Coulter, 2470 Faraday Avenue. Dear David, I wanted to list some of the changes on the subject project. • , Architectural- 1. City of Carlsbad did not accept the water curtain in lieu of the one (1 )-hour assembly at the east side of the building. Therefore a rated assembly has been added. 2. The containment requirements shown for lsoton Filling (room #112) and Desludging. (Detail 12/A4) have been changed due to County of San Diego requirements. In order to proceed with the work proposed in this plancheck we have deleted any containment areas and they will be submitted under a separate submittal. This has been discussed with The City of Carlsbad Building Department. o Electrical 1. Added connections to automatic doors. 2. Added Hi-b9y lights in lsotone room. 3. Added exhaust connections in lsotone room. 4. Added six signs where needed throughout. 5. Added connections to clean room Air conditioning. 6. Eliminated from this permit the feed to remote truck dock (added to previous permit for that structure). 7. Added Desludger Bui ing detail to E.3. 12220 El Camino Real Suite 200 San Diego, CA 92130 619.793.4777 619.793.4787 Fax L/PROJ ECT/98filesi98309. T /MltoDY 4-20-99 PLANNING/ENGINEERING APPROVALS PERMIT NUMBER CB Cfl19'B -RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL ADDITION MINOR ( < $10,000.00) OTHER DATE ?/2f/?fl --+-, ----+-, --- TENANT IMPROVEMENT PLAZA CAMINO REAL CARLSBAD COMPANY STORES VILLACE FAIRE COMPLETE OFFICE BUILDING -------------------- DoCS/Mlsforms/Planning Engineering Approvals Carlsbad Fire Department 990107 2560 Orion Way Carlsbad, CA 92008 - Plan Review Requirements Category: _ Buildin;;I-~ Fire Prevention (760) 931-2121 '----~ Date of Report: 05/11/1999 --Reviewed by: ------------ Name: SMITH CONSULT ARCH Address: 12220 EL CAMINO REAL STE 200 City, State: SAN DIEGO CA 92130 Plan Checker: Job#: 990107 Job Name: Beckman Bldg 1 Tl CB99-998 Job Address: 2470 Faraday Av Ste. or Bldg. No. IZ! Approved D Approved Subject to D Incomplete Review FD Job# The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and / or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes and standards. Please review carefully all comments attached as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. C The item you have submitted for review has been approved subject to the attached conditions. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or iristall improvements. Please resubmit to this -office the necessary plans and / or specifications required to indicate compliance with applicable codes and standards. The item you have submitted for review is incomplete. At this time, this office cannot adequately conduct a review to determine compliance with the applicable codes and / or standards. Please review carefully all comments attached. Please resubmit the necessary plans and/ or specifications to this office for review and approval. 1st 990107 2nd 3rd FD File# FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 2560 ORION WAY, CARLSBAD, CA 92008-7280 (760) 931-2121 Other Agency ID Apr-20-99 Ol:OlP ·.,.~- tit' . -, \l41?vf )/-if' f~v'P . ~v~;)5> ~b e, 1,ftJ 0-.. r/ b·n~ €-f;',:/~,v. i~'?/ ~~r l· (;' tV7 t-l -1.r.s ~~f /4v/ 0 -t-~ + 4f,(.i+l~w I~ t,.o {), (,tl rl<s.u -.oL -1 t; 1 <=i Psf' vL-;, "1,Q, () 1 ~i ~0 M J~p~ J"hJ H iu,#-ti Jlt~ {Jr':;:. q //:/ 1' J,,~ ~ '/1' ~ I P/\·4 'fj :; t w () ,:;: t ""/-t) f=ir1'- <p< lvL ~ 7;0 'f.. P.:02 f 17 +-p? :::: I ... ? ? Apr-20-99 01:0lP s3B s38 NEU BH UNDER UNIT slpl2vls0b4148TB£AM ANALYSIS PRD6RAMs1p9vlsOb4148T SPAN LENGTH= 8.00 ft (5ii1ple Spani UN!fORM LOADS (k/{t & ftl ml 111 X1 -X2 0.092 0,000 o.oo 7.00 0.046 0.060 o.oo 8.00 REACTIOIIS (kJ LOAD LEFT D2ad 0.546 Live 0,240 Total 0.786 MAXIl1UN FORCES RI6HT 0.465 0.240 0.705 Y aax = 0,786 k @ o.oo rt M aax = 1.560 kft@ 3.~7 ft DEFLECT!OffS LOAD Total Live Dead (EI -= Hn"2J Defl (in} l 7924/£! 5530/EI 12395/El Pos. Hotent Lu· 1.00 ft Brace Spacing = 1,00 ft X (ftj 3.99 4,00 nidspan Actual : 3.5" x 7.25" tlsOB Design per 1~91 NDS Douglas Fir-larch STRESSES (psii Shear @ 1 d1 : V = 0.67 k@ 0,60 ft Fv = m fv :: 39 33 1. tb' = 1865 fb = 611 33 Z Live LDf = 1.251 Cf= 1.30, Cl = 1.00 Repetitive Use tte~ber OfflECTIONS (inJ <E" 1700 ksil Total = 0,09 = L /1012 live = 0.03 = L /3280 Dead : 0.07 P.03 s0.804/20/99 99-10 (6,60)s0p10.00hl2v0s0b3T .. . . 't.·:!·· .,.:~ ... Prime Structural Engineers 16980 Via Tazon, Suite 260 San Diego, CA 92127 Ph. (619) 487-0311 Fax (619) 487-0206 Structural Calculations for: Beckman Coulter -Bldg. 1 2470 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 "· . . , Mar-15-99 09:26 . . , ... -~ ..... :~, :,, .. ... _1JG-iJ f]M~I I ~fl0~ !q, t; \.,09~~ f>. ;Jf ':,{' ,.__ '(L ~ lG'% ;; tJ~) ~t-'l .J.-,z_. 'b. + ~(} ' W9-t:. e .of?r-~ 1,;., -r t t,)t,.~ lv,ir.> -;.. , '+' P.02 f'A PRiME . JOB: ~i:.' -~ ·---~ • .:>ln.lJCIURAl DAiE: ::2J:~ "' ENGINEERS sm : -.l-- f., r~? 1--7 ;z...'b /,'-1" -<JL-:::. ~7, c:; r17J µ-,;:..-to-of""->f r: ~ ;;r;,-,J 'ki--vJtdQ.,. .,,.<:_~'· ., ~ 1~1 ~lf ~ B~. v ft..f" 17'f._o ~vp ® 1-;t, ~ \;o rr -, Ctk·o iXf'.:_ ~ ,i,~ o~-(\f' i -<[r?.A c~ i r 11?~t-o -~.& ri--- ~J$lo)-, e \ k, uc,} v -{, v ,-,{ (C, (/ ,:;. CJ._J.,i 1~0 f'-li ti'{l l,,\ • 1ft ( -.I e---if I() .(/ ': f?l{iS,.\ · ¾"· '4· ;1,11,-19 J,.A,+~ 'Z,. v fi '"If -Z-·~ ,,,,,..o ,.o (5.o f':,f' !!-~,;,) f '1(-' I tJ ·n J--!.. ,'1.1 .,; ~f 't'.f;t0 i.\ ,£-~_ £Jf-61-l~ ~, Mar-15-99 09:27 f 11 (l ,., . f,, \..,,,g'y ~'lj . 1/h P.03 8-o f',f 1', i:;, u:· -r-;I, e> ~ 6/,).. o f f..r (O..~ ,c.. G,~' ;;;. r..;1,.< (1~ l.Vo""' t3 ,of7j ,l t;n,< -1--' ~b ,?, 6a..Q {itf -;;.. i;its ~i-,( ~ w L,, ,c::;.-la.. <i )l. .;, rv< l-'?-+-~~OJ ~ V'{ 0 f \c'l1:7 -.. ~··· -· ~>c$---~ #~ "l,J <,-,.:., ( M I '') ( . "' 1 rv / 11,'11 i~.,. ( -->;,~{ {a-~ +'"},,c-\i-.,. J7E; 1-Clb_ ~t;, ~/1v1-[ i' r~i, Mar-15-99 09:27 P.04 ~ bo 9 "1--~IV• Sf <'14 6,.( _. 97~ .. ·. r J r ,. 3 r, 1, .l\ ,,.d,. {L--:---, r7 q~tJ {e,, __. V c:. = ,,t.1--J~.-,:1 )'( Jd--;e.. -::.. r rp ·-1 ?/ vt f 5 Mar-15-99 09:27 s3B s3B CLG JTS OVER WASH RODH s1pl2v1sOb4148TBEAn ANALYS1S PP.D6RAris1p9v1sOb4148T SPAN LENGTH= 15.50 ft (Si!i!ple 5panl UH[fORM LOADS Ck/ft & ft) 11d vl Xl -X2 o.oog 0.013 u.oo is.so 0.005 0.000 0.00 5.00 POINT LOADS (k & ft} Pd Pl X 0.1!2 0.000 5.00 REACTIONS Ck) LOAD.. . · · ·;·.-:,·· .• ) Dead Live Total iiAX iiiUii FORCES LEH 0. 169 0.103 0.272 RIGHT 0.112 0.103 0.215 V t.clX = 0.272 k t! 0,00 ft M nax = 1,026 kft@ 5,97 ft LOAD Total Live Dead Oefl (in} 43426/EI 17273fEI 25101/EI Pos, Ho3ent Lu; 1.00 ft Brace Spacing = 1.00 ft X ! ft} 7.51 7.75 ::idspan iictual : 1.5" x 5.5" #2sOB Design per 1991 NDS Douglas Fir-Larch STRESSES (osi l Shea; @ 1 d' : V ~ 0.25 k@ 0.46 ft Fv ~ 119 fv = 47 40 7. fb' ~ 1623 fb = 1627 100 % <-- Live LDF = 1.25, Cf= 1.30, Cl= 0.99 Repetitive Use He•ber DEfLECT!OnS (in) (E = 1600 ksi) Total :: !.31 -L / 143 Live 0.52 = l / 356 Dead = 0. 78 ..... -:·· .. P.05 s0B03/12/99 9~MO (6.60ls0p10.00h12v0s0h3T Mar-15-99 09:27 s3B s3B BM 11 slp12vlsOb4148TBEAn AMALYSIS PR06RAMslp9v1s0b4148f SPAN l£NGTH = 19. 50 ft <Sispl2 Span} UNifORn LOAOS <k!tt & ftJ wd wl Xl -!2 0.094 0,080 · o.oo 19.50 REIICTIDNS ( l) LOAD LEFT RIGHT Dead 0.916 0,916 Live 0.780 0.780 Total 1.6% 1.6% iiA:Ul'iUi'i fORCES . ·\··.·:! · ,,.:.~" V ;ax = 1" 70 k @ 0.00 ft n eax = 8.27 kft@ 9.75 ft DEFLECTIONS LOAD Total Li V!? De.id (El = kin·'2J Oen (in) 5&6070/EJ 260262/EI 305908/EI Pos, no!ent Lu= 4,00 ft ~rij(f Sp~cing = 4.00 ft X (ft) S,75 9.75 midspan 6ov. Deflection: Total= l/180 Required El= 435439 kin~2 4 x 12 i2sOB Actual : 3.5" x 11.25" Design per !99i NDS Douglas fir-Larch STRESSES (psi l Shear ~ 1d' : V = 1.53 k@ 0.94 ft Fv = 119 fv = SB 49 Z fb' = 1371) fb = !344 98 t Live LDF = 1.25, Cf= 1.10, ,Cl = 0.99 Repetitive Use "e•ber DEfLECiluNS {in, (E = 1600 ksi} Total = 0.85 = l / 275 66 l Live ~ 0.39 = L / 597 40 Z Dead = 0.4& . . , P.06 sOB03112/99 9MO A PRIME JOB: q1-1cA smucruRAL DATE: tn4f! ENGINEERS SHT : _r;___ (6,60}s0pl0,00h12v0s0b3T Mar-15-99 09:28 s3B .,-, BM 12 slp12v1sOb414BTBEAn ANALYSIS PROGRAMslp9vlsOb4148T SPAN LENGTH = 19,50 ft (Si;;;ple Span) UHIFORM LOADS {k/ft & ft) 11d 111 Xl -X2 0.150 0.140 0.00 19.50 REACTHlNS (k) LOAO lffl RIGHT Dead 1.463 1.463 Live t.365 l. 365 Total 2.828 2.828 l!Al liiUn f0Rt£S . ·':·.·::·· .,.:;.· V 11ax ;: 2.83 k @ 0.00 ft H 11ax = 13. 78 kft @ 9. 75 ft DEFLECTIONS (El = kinA2) LOAD Defl (in) X (ft) Total 943450/£1 9.75 Live 455459/El 9,75 Dead 487992/El midspan TOTAL Def! El L / 180 725731 L / 240 %7641 L / 360 1451462 •,!.·'· LIVE Oefl EI ., -L / 240 467137 L / 360 700706 L / 480 934274 ·:- sOB03/12/99 99-10 P.07 £. PRIME JOB:~ ~smucruRALoAJE: ~~~ .§"~~ ENGINEERS SHI : ---kz-. (6,60)s0p10.00hl2v0s0b3T Mar-15-99 09:28 s3B s3B s38 BN 12 slp12vlsOb4148TBEAn DES!SN PR06RAns1p9vls0b4l48T Pos. Koaent Lu= 4.00 ft B;ace Spacing = 4.00 ft 6ov, Deflection: Total = L/180 Required £I= 725731 kinA2 4 x 12 SSs08 Actual : 3.5• x 11.25" Design per 1111 NOS Douglas Fir-larch ... , .·::·· ... ~~'STRESSES (psi> Shear e 'd' : V = 2,56 k@ 0,94 ft Fv = 119 fv = 97 82 i. Fb 1 = 2259 fb = 2240 99 I Live LDF ::. 1.25, Cf = l.101 Cl = 0.99 Repetitive Use ffe~ber DEFLECTIONS (inl {E = 1900 ksi) Total = 1. 20 = l / t % 92 t Live = 0.58 = l / 405 59 ! Dead = 0.62 6 x 12 i1sOB Actual : 5.5• x 11,5• Design per 1991 NDS Douglas fir-Larch STRESSES {psi) Shear ~ 'd' : V = 2.55 k ~ 0.96 ft fv : I 06 fv = 60 57 ! IV = !680 fb = 1364 81 7. live L!lf = L25, Cf = LOO, Cl = 1.00 DEFLECTIONS {in) (E = i600 ksi> Total= 0.85 = L / 277 65 i ~Live :. 0.41 = L / 573 42 t Dead = 0,44 P.08 ~ A PRIME JOa: 1'ir1a.-1 STRUCTUR.l\!.. DATE: ".':;:H ~ ENGINEERS SHT: ~ s0803/ 12/99 99-10 (6,60ls0pl0,00h12vOsOb3T I Mar-l.5-99 09:28 s3B s3B 81113 slp12v1s0b4148TBEAn ANALYSIS PRDSRAns1pSv1sOb4148T SPA>! LENSJH = 23,(10 ft <Sis:ph> Sp.1n) UnIFORn LOADS {k/ft & ft) Yd vl Xl -X2 0,080 0,052 0.00 23.00 POlNT LOADS fk & ftl Pd Pl X 1.463 1.365 11.50 REtiCT!OnS Ck l LOAD LEFT !lead. 1.651 .. ':·.-:! ...•. :.:, Live .. 1. 286 Total 2,938 MAXIMU~ FORCES Rl6HT 1.651 1.286 2.938 V sax = 2,94 k @ 0.00 ft M ~a~ = 25,02 kft ~ 11,50 ft DEflECTIOHS (EI= kinA2) LOAD Defl Ci n) Total 2072474/Et Live 92B449/EI Dead 1144525/El Pos. noaent Lu= 4.00 ft &race Spacing = 4,00 ft X (ft) 11.50 11.50 midspan Cuv, Deflection: Total= L/180 Required Ei = 1351940 kinA2 6 x 11i GlsOB Adual : s.s• x 15.5" Design per 199! HDS Douglas Fir-Larch STRESSES (psi) Shear@ 'd' : V = 2,77 k@ 2l.7I ft fv = 106 fv = 49 46 i fb1 = 1630 fb = 1363 84 i live LDF = 1.251 Cf= 0.9i, Ci= 0.99 DEtLECi[ORS {inl CE= 1600 ksi) Total = 0.76 = L / 364 50 i Live = 0,34 -L / 812 30 1. Dead = 0,42 .r.··· ,. s0803/12/99 SHO P.09 A PRiME JOB:~ smucmP..AL oAiE: ~ ENGINEERS SHT : --ti- C6.60)s0p10.00h12v0s0b3T Mar-15-99 09:28 s3B s3B BH 14 s1pl2v1s0b4148TBEAH ANALYSIS PR06RAns1p9vls0b414BT SPAN LENSTH = 15.00 ft (Shplti Span) Un!FORn LOAOS (k/ft & ft) yd .rl X1 -X2 0.080 Q,-052 0,00 15.00 REACTIONS (k) LOAD LEFT Rl6HT Dead 0,600 0,600 Live 0.394 0.394 Total 0.994 0.994 liAWiUn FORCES .. '.:·.-:, ..... :~, V max = 0, 994 k @ 0.00 ft n aax = 3,727 kft@ 7,50 ft DffLECTIONS ffJ = kin"2) LOAD Defl { i nJ Total 150926/EI live 59801/EI Il!!i!d 91125/EI Po~. no1ent Lu= 4.00 ft Frace Spacing = 4.00 ft X (ft) 7.50 7.50 midspan Gov. Deflection : Total= L/180 Required El= 150926 kinA2 4 x 8 412sOB ilctual : 3,5" x 7.25" Design per 1991 NOS Douglas fir-La,ch STRESSES (psil Shear @ 'd' : V = 0.~1 k@ 0.60 ft Fv .,, 119 fv = 54 45 I fb' = 1623 fb = 1458 90 l Live LDf = 1.25, Cf= 1.30, CI= 0.99 Repetitive Use "e1ber DEFLECTIONS (in) (E = 1600 ksi) Total = 0.85 ; L / 212 85 % Live = 0.j4 = L / 535 45 X Dead " 0.51 s0B03/12/99 9'HO P.10 A PRIME . .'08: 16/-/D smucTURAl. DATE:~ ENGINEERS SHl : (6,60)s0p10,00h12v0s0b3T I Mar-J.5-99 09:29 ALLO~ABLE WOOD POST DESi6N LDf -1.25 c'~ 0.80 Ke ~ 1,00 Kee= 0.30 l = 7,00 ft. (Unsupported Height) fce=Kce1E1/(le/d)"2 fc 1=Fc"1(t+Cfce/fc 1 )/2c 1-@sqrt((1+{Fce/fc")/2c'}A2-fce/Fc"/c 1)) ~-----------------------~---------:--·------~--------i--------:--------:--------:-------- MEMBER 1 I i---------------------------------: Actual : llrea : lALLOWilBL :cONCEiiTR No11inal Size Size I in"2 l fee re• Fe' : LOAD b h : E<KSJ) le/d I Cksi} : (ksil : ('.·:;i) ? {kips) :-------·~~-:--------------:------:---------:-,------:--------:--------;--------:-------- ! 2 l 4 ft2 I 1.50 3.50 l 5,25 : 1600.00 l 56,00 l tu.: 1.fi3 l tu.: IU. I ! 2 X 4 12! ;"? L5Q_ 1,_50 : 5.25 : Hi00.00 l 24.00 1-1) •. 83 ! 1.63 : 0.72 I 3.78 •• t .. -~ • • •• l 2 :<"t-,2 I 1.50 5.50 l 8,25 l 1600.00 l 56.00 l N.A,: 1.63 1 N.A.! N.A. 1 l 2 X 6 12* I l.5() 5.50 l 8.25 l 1600. 00 l 15.27 I 2.06: 1.63 I 1.24 I 10.27 i-----------l-----~--------:------t---------:--------~--------~--------:--------:-------- I 2 l 4 t1 l I.SO 3.50 l 5.25 I 1700.00 l 56.00 I N.A. l 1.81 l l 2 X 4 11• l 1,50 3.50: 5,25: 1700,00 l 24.00 l 0,89: 1.81 : : 2 X 6 t1 l J.50 5.50 l 8.25 l 1700,00 : 56,00 : H.A. l 1.81 i : 2 X 6 111 : 1.50 5.50 l 8.25 l 1700.00 l 15.27 : 2,19 l 1.81 l N.A, l N.A. O. 77 : o!.O:i N.A, i N,A. 1,36 : 11.24 ---~•••••••-•••--------••----~~I-•••••••• --------~--------:--------:-------•i••w-•--~ I 3 X 4 i2 I 2.50 3.50: 8.75: 1600.00 l 33.60: 0.43: 1.81 I 0.72 l 6,2j I I I I 3 X 4 W I 2.50 3.50 l 8.75 l 1600.00 l 24.00 I 0.83 l 1.81 I 0.72 I 6.29 I I I I I : 3 X 4 ii I 2.50 3,50: B.75 l noo.oo : 33.60; 0.45 l 1.81 I 1.24 I 10.83 I I I : 3 X 4 lit I 2.50 3.50 l 8,i5 l 1700.00 I 24.00 l 0.8'3 l 1.81 I 0.72 I 6.29 I I I I 3 X 6 t2i I 2.50 5.50 :13.75 I 1600.00 I 15.27: 2.06 ' 1,81 I 1.43 : 19.71 I I I I I I ;-----------1--------------:------:---------:--------:--~ ----:--------:--------:-------- I 4 V .I .ur1 I 3.50 3.so :12.2s: 1600.00 I 24,00: 6.83 I 1.63 : 0.72 \ 8,81 I • A 't Pt I I I 4 X 6 f2 I 3,SO S.50 ll9.2S I 1500.00 : 24.00 I 0.83: 1.63; 0.72 I 13,84 I I I I I I 4 X 5 !2f I 3,SO 5.50 119.25 I 1600. 00 i 15.27: 2,06 I 1.63 I l.Z4 I 23.95 I ' I I : 4 l 8 !2 I 3.50 7.25 125,38 l 1600,00 ! 24.00 I 0.83 l 1.63 I o. 72 : 18.25 ' I I • 4 X B f2I I 3.50 7.25 :25.38 I !600,00 I 11.59 l 3.58 I 1.63 l 1.43 I 36,37 ' I I I l ;------·----~----~---------:------i---------~--------:--------:--------1--------:--~----- ' 4 X 4 JI I 3.50 3.50 :12.25 I 1700.00 i 24.00 I 0.89: 1,81 I 0.77 : 9,4S ' I I , l 4 l fi ti I 3.50 s.so \19.25 , 1700.00 I 24.00: 0.89 ' 1.81 I o. 77 l 14.85 I . I I I : 4 X 6 llf : 3.50 5.50 :19.25 l 1700.00 : 15.27 I 2.19 I 1.81 I 1.36 I 26,22 I I I I I 4 X 8 ti I 3.50 7.25 l25.38 l 1700.00 I 24.09: 0.89 I 1.81 I 0.77 I 19.57 I I I I I ' I 4 l 8 Jlf l 3.50 7,25 125.38: 1700.00 l 11.59 : 3.80 l 1. 81 I 1.59 I 40,23 I ' ' --------·~----------------------·-~-----:-~------:--------:--------:--------~-------- : 6 X 6 il I 5.50 5.50 :ao.25: 1600.00: !5.2i I 2.06 I 1.25 I 1.04 I 31.41 I I I ' I i 6 X 8 ii I !i.50 7.50 :41.25 : 1600.00 l 15,27 ' 2.06 I 1.25 l i. 04 I 42.84 I ' I I : 6 X 8 ei-1 ' 5.50 7.50 l 41.25 : iE,00. 00 : li.20 1 3,83 : 1.25 I 1.15 I 47,48 I I I 6 XlO ii1 I 5.50 1.50 152.25: 1600.00: 15.27 I 2,06 l 1.156 : Q,9!! ' 51.14 I I I I I 6 X10 fb~ : 5,50 9.50 152.25 I 1&00.00 l 8,84: 6.14 I 1. 156 I 1.11 I 57,87 I I I I I -------n-•• •~•=-n--------:--------~-~----:--------:--------:--------:--------:-------- NOTES; I) f Indicates Braced in Weak Direc~ion 2) Allo~able Stresses Per UBC 1994 ~ Douglas fir larch 3) Allowable Loads Based on UBC 19941 Section 2307,3 * P.11 PRIME JOB: ~Ot STRUCTURAL DATE:~ _ENGINEERS -SHI' ; I I Mar-15-99 09:29 " Member: C358-138-20 Manufacturer: Generic 97 Yield -33.0 KSI Configuration·: Single Dimensions Gross Properties Loads and Bracing ueplli -· ····-= ---··z:-s2-sn · ·in Area--··-···-=· ··-·-·· u.24 Flange = 1.3750 in Ix ;; 0.48 Lip = 0.3750 in ly ::: 0.06 Bend = 0.0938 in Rx == 1.42 t == 0.0346 in Ry = 0.50 Punch = 1.5000 in Cw = 0.16 v\~ip = 0.2466 in Jx10E3 = 0.09 Wftg = 1.1183 in Xo = -1.03 Wweb = 3.3683 in Ro = 1.83 Beta = 0.68 Va = 1.03 AXIAL ANALYSIS Eq. C4.1-1 Fex "' Pi"2E/(Klx/Rx)A2 = 50.50 KS! Eq. C4.1-1_ -.-fey = Pi/\2E/(Kly/Ry)112 = 505.44 KSI 1n2-·----·-· in4 in4 Axial: p = Kxlx "' KyLy = in in in6 in4 in in KtU = Sending: KIPS i \ M~ .,,-:Mx = KLx = KLy = Klt = . -·!:;q.-G3.1.2-9 Sigt = (GJ + Pi112ECw/KU112}/ARo""2.::::: 417.76 KSI 0.11 i08.00 12.00 12.00 1.44 12.00 12.00 12.00 Eq. C4.2.1 Fet = (Sigt"' Fex -((Sigt "!' Fex)"2 -48eta*Sigt*FexjA.5/2Beta = 48.48 KS! Fe = 48.48 KSI - Fe > Fy/2. th·erefore Fn = Fy(1 -Fy/4Fe}. Fn = 27.38 KSI Find Ae at stress Fn: eFlange = 1.118 in; eLip = 0.220 in; eWeb = 1.180 in; Ae = 0.158 in Eq. C4-2 Pn = AeFn = 4.31 KIPS KIPS in in in I/ • n.-ln in in in Eq. C4-1 Pa = Pn/1.92 = 2.25 KIPS VVith 1/3 stress increase Pa = 3.00 KlPS BENDING ANAi YSIS Eq. C3.1.2-9 Sigt= (GJ + Pi112ECw/UA2)/ARo"2 = 417.76 KS! Eq C3.1 _2-8 Sigy = PiA2E/(ly/Ry)A2 = 505.44 KSI Eq. C3.1.2-5 Me = RoA(Sigt*Sigy)".5 = 197.26 K-in Eq. C3.1.2-3 ~y = Sf*Fy = 8.66 K-in •. Me> 0.5My Therefore, Mc= My(1 -My/4Mef = 8.566 K-in Find effective section at stress f, f = Mc/Sf = 32.64 KSI eFlange = 1.117 in; eLip = 0.141 in; eWeb = 1.868 in; Sc = 0.248 inA3 Eq. C3.1.2-1 Mn = ScMc/Sf = 8.10 K-in Eq. C3.1-1 Ma -Mn/1.q7 = 4.85 K-in With 1/3 stress increase Ma = 6.46 K-in COiviBiNED AXIAL AND BENDiNG Eq, C5-5 Per == Pi112Elx/Lx"2 = 961.i? KIPS Eq. C5-4 Omegax = 1 -1.92P/Pcr = 1.000 inieraction Equations: Eq. C5-1 P/Pa + Mx/MaOmegax = 0.347 Eq. C5-2 Pf Pao + Mx/Ma = 0.338 PRIME STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS BECK~llAN Vvith 1/3 stress increase = 1282.36 KiPS , Wit11 1/3 stress increase :::c 1.000 VVith 1/3 stress increase = 0.260 With 1/3 stress increase = 0.254 P. 12 PROJECT NAME BUJLDING CONDITIONED FLOOR AREA 4 CLIMATE ZONE so. JZ-Ga( T. 7 BUILDJNG TYPE ~ NONRESIDENTIAL D HIGH RISE RESIDENTIAL D HOTEL/MOTEL GUEST ROOM PHASE OF COfl!STRUCTION D NEW CONSTRUCTION D ADDITION ~ AL TERA TION D UNCONDITIONED (File Affidavit) COMPONENT D OVERALL ENVELOPE C PERFORMANCE This Certificate of Compliance lists the building features and performance specifications needed lo comply with Title 24, Parts 1 and 6 of the California Code of Regulations. This certificate applies only lo building envelope requirements. Th_e documentation preparer hereby certifies that the documentation is accurate and complete. 1 ',l l---./!:::~~___,[2~::::.1:'.~.J.l::!.'Y..:t:::J.... ___ j_ __ ~~r:!2__,zu_~~~'!2!..?2. __ J__l:'1_~!._-f-~~- T he ~cip~E~elo!f ~/n{r ~[:e~~ifies1~;(the /f/Je~ ,~n~ fin represented in this set of construction\1 ~ documents i.s consistent with the other compliance forms and worksheets, with the specifications, and with any other . calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed building has been designed to meet the envelope requirements contained in sections 11 O, 116 through 118, and 140, 142, 143 or 14 9 to Title 24, part 6. Please check one: D D I hereby affirm that I am eligible under the provisions of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code to sign this document as the person responsible for its preparation; and that I am a civil engineer or architect. I I affirm that I am eligible under the exemption to Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code by Section 5537.2 of the Business and Professions Code lo sign this document as the person responsible for its preparation; and that l am a licensed contractor preparing documents for work that I have contracted to perform. I affinn that I am eligible under the exemption to Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code by Section ----l of the _______________ Code to sign this document as the person responsible for its preparation; and for the following reason: __________________________ _ PRINCIPAL ENVELOPE DESIGNER -NAME For detailed instructions on the use of this and all Energy Efficiency Standards compliance forms. please refer to !he Nonresidential Manual published by the California Energy Commission. ENV-1: Required on plans for all submittals. Part 2 may be incorporated in schedules on plans. ENV-2: Used for all submittals; choose appropriate version depending on method or envelope complicJnce. ENV-3: Optional. Use if default U-values are not used. Choose appropriate version for assembly U-value to be c Nonresidential Complsnce Form PROJECT NAME DATZ/-- PROJECT ADORESSZO 70 rf).R._ /) II y PRINCIPAL DESIGNER • MECHANICAL . A w IJ i .J. H 'f?;J 4 1 .rJ e ,;;-K-> TELEPH0~5, 6f -SL.f'l-o7BB _St} IZ4--SQ. Pr. NONRESIDENTIAL D HIGH RISE RE IDENTIAL D HOTEL/MOTEL GUEST ROOM PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION . o NEW CONSTRUCTION D ADDITION jg}AL TERA TION D UNCONDITIONED (File Affadavit} . METHOD Or MECHANICAL COM PRESCRIPTIVE D PERFORMANCE PROOf OF ENVELOPE COMPLIANCE ~ PREVIOUS ENVELOPE PERMIT D ENVELOPE COMPLIANCE A TT ACHED This Certificate of Compliance lists the building features and perfonna·nce specifications needed to comply with Title 24, Parts 1 and 6 of the California Code of Regulations. This certificate applies only to building mechanical requirements . . ... . -1 Toe documentation preparer hereby certifies that the documentation is accurate and complete. The Principal Mechanical Designer hereby certifies that the proposed building aes!gn represented in this set of construction documents is consistent with the other compliance forms and worksheets, with the specifications, and with any other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed building has been designed lo meet the mechanical requirements contained in sections 11 O through 115, 120 through 124, 140 through 142, 144 and 145. Please check one: ~ I hereby affirm that I am eligible under the provisions of Division· 3 of the Business and Professions Code to sign this document as the person responsible for its preparation; and that I am a civil engineer, mechanical engineer, or architect. O l affinn that l am eligible under the exemption to Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code by Section 5537 .2 of the Business and Prof edsions Code to sign this document as the person responsible for its preparation; and that I am a licensed contractor preparing documents for work that l have contracted to perform. D I affirm that l am eligible under the exemption to Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code by Section ___ _ of the _______________ Code to sign this document as the person responsible for its preparation: and for the following reason: ---------------------------- For detailed instructions on the use of this and all Energy Efficiency Standards compliance forms, please refer to the Nonresidential Manual published by the California Energy Commission. MECH·1: Required on plans for all submittals. Parts 2 & 3 may be incorporated in schedules on plans. MECH-2: Required for all submit1als; choose appropriate version depending on method oi mechanical compliance. MECH-3: Required for all submittals, but form does not have to be completed if location of mechanical equipernent schedule is Indicated on the form per Section 4.3.3. MECH-4: Required for all submittals unless required outdoor ventilation rates and airflows are shown on plans per Section 4.3.4. Nonrosidan/il11 C-Omplance Form Ju/'f 1995 I PROJECT NAME l.3eC-lt--P'JA,J covli ee.. I MECHANICAL SYSTEMS =lsvs=TE=M=NA=ME=========l .__--4-/i'--C_--='3-=-G _ ___.I I 0U-/. I .__I ___ ___, Non(rd i\Fieili\\ 5 -5 -----------< TIME CONTROL SETBACK CONTROL J3 ISOLATION ZONES HEAT PUMP THERMOSTAT? tJ ELECTRIC HEAT? FAN CONTROL tJ"/J, VAVMINIMUM POSITION CONTROL? /V SIMULTANEOUS HEAT/COOL? HEAT AND COOL SUPPL '(RESET? ./J 1 VENTILATION OUTDOOR DAMPER CONTROL? I} ECONOMIZER TYPE . · ... ···.·.,:· :·;::";./ OUTDOOR AIR CFM HEATING EQUIP. TYPE i HIGH EFFIC.? I . ·-: MAKE AND MODEL NUMBER COOLING EQUIP. TYPE I HIGH EFFIC.? I ··(.·'.·-.::. MAKE AND MODEL NUMBER ··:,· / I 1 CODE TABLES: Entor codo from table below Into columns above. I HEAT PUMP THERMOSTAT? TIME CONTROL SETBACK CTRL. ISOLATION ZONES FAN CONTROL S: Prog. Switch H: Heating Enter number or I: Inlet Vanes ELECTRIC HEAT? 0: Occupancy Sensor C: Cooling Isolation Zones. P: Variable Pitch M: Manual Timer B: Both V:VFD VAV MINIMUM POSITION CONTROL? Y: Yes O: Other SIMULTANEOUS HEAT/COOL? N:No VENTILATION OUTDOOR DAMPER ECONOMIZER O.A. CFM HEAT AND COOL SUPPLY RESET? B: Air Balance A: Auto A: Air Enter Outdoor Air C: Outside Air Cort. G: Gravity W:Water CFM. HIGH EFFICIENCY? M: Out. Air Measure N: Not Required Note: This shall be no D: Demand Control less than Column G oo N: Natural MECH-4. \.. .,, ,• ..... ··. · ..... ; .. ·: •:,•:,.: . < Nonf9sidentia/ ComplisnC6 Form December 1991 COoL-re;,j_ SYSTEM NAME DUCT TYPE (SUppty Return, otc.) DUCT LOCATION (Roof, Plenum, etc.) ~v;J, Ider: PU'tvllM svl, 1 If.BT. /?e'NV/-"J I SYSTEM NAME PIPE TYPE (Supply, Return, otc.) Af,1/-b . l .. · :i)~if ti\ ••' ... . ::, Nonr&sid9ntisl ComplisnCQ Form Bi DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD ··,.:":·-,,· DUCT INSULATION A-VALUE 2.) 2., J NOTE TO. ·-_::FIELD.":":' : .. · .. -·:· :-::·\::_: :·-:.::: . ..:".· : .. --:·: NOTET?·;_ ·.·.·FJELD·:,-.: _::·:_·: ·.·.-·it, . ··--.:··-: .. ·:·. :·.::··.:::::'.\: ::-· . :: .•. :} .:,-... · · .. ·· >·-: •,::·· .. :,· ·.:··. •: .... · .:• Decombor 1991 PROJECT NAME ~t:lr)/9,J I I SYSTEM NAME NOTE: Provide one copy of this form for so.ch mochanicnl system when using tho Proscriptive Approach. 1. DESIGN CONDITIONS: • OUTDOOR, DRY BULB TEMPERATURE • OUTDOOR, WET BULB TEMPERATURE • INDOOR, DRY BULB TEMPERATURE 2. SIZING: • VENTILATION LOAD • ENVELOPE LOAD • LIGHTING • PEOPLE • MISC. EQUIPMENT ·OTHER ·OTHER ··,: ~ - b75 TOTAL CFM (From MECH-4) WATTS/SF II OF PEOPLE (From MECH-4) WATTS/SF rlAl~ ffb:;c,e:.>.5 64><}1 /J/11 e: NJ (Describe), 1--c_occ-o_L_1N_G_ I :;~a I J{J,8 . /J. /, z_ 2/S J,O ,8 33,.7 (Describe) TOTALS I 50~ 0 I L---f--1 3, SELECTION: A. SAFETYM'ARMUP FACTOR B. MAXIMUM ADJUSTED LOAD (Totals from o.bovo X Safoty/Wo.rmup Factor) C. INSTALLED EQUIPMENT CAPACITY IF LINE 3-C IS GREATER THAN LINE 3-B, EXPLAIN DESIGN FAN DESCRIPTION BRAKE HP , 'JIJI A. NOTE: Include only fan· systems oxcooding 25 HP (soo §144). Total Fan System Power Demand may not excood 0.8 Wo.tts/CFM for constantvolumo systems or 1.25 Wo.tts/CFM for VAV systems, NonrosickmtlaJ Complillnce Fonn EFFICIENCY MOTOR DRIVE NUMBER OF FANS I 7,,, 60~5 S9.h KBtu / Hr PEAK WATTS BX EX 746 / (C X D) KBtu / Hr CFM (Supply Fans) TOTALS I l~---Th.•e~ TOTAL FAN SYSTEM POWER DEMAND WATTS/CFM Col.F/Col.G DoCOOJoor 1991 PROJECT NAME SYSTEM NAME · NOTE: Provide one copy of this form for each mechanical system when using the Prescriptive Approach. 1. DESIGN CONDITIONS: • OUTDOOR, DAY BULB TEMPERATURE • OUTDOOR, WET BULB TEMPERATURE • INDOOR, DRY BULB TEMPERATURE 2.SIZING: • VENTILATION LOAD • ENVELOPE LOAD • LIGHTING • PEOPLE • MISC. EQUIPMENT -OTHER • OTHER I / 80 j TOTAL CFM (From MECH-4) WATTS/SF # OF PEOPLE (From MECH-4) WATTS/SF (Describe) COOLING ~ >----q-o_____, De] 72- 72-72- 2,q -B 2 6 :,:) , /JO Z,7 / t /. B TOTALS 11,3 I .__I _, 3. SELECTION: A. SAFETY/WARMUP FACTOR B. MAXIMUM ADJUSTED LOAD (Totals from above X Saloty/Warmup Factor) C. INSTALLED EQUIPMENT CAPACITY IF LINE 3-C IS GREATER THAN LINE 3-8, EXPLAIN DESIGN FAN DESCRIPTION BRAKE HP ;J,1/, NOTE: Include only Ian.systems excooding 25 HP (soo §144). Total Fan System Power Demand may not excaad 0.8 Watts/CFM for constant volume systems or 1.25 Watts/CFM tor VAV systems. Nonrosk:16ntial Compliance Form EFFICIENCY MOTOR DRIVE NUMBER OF FANS J,Z, § ,-. 7 KBtu / Hr KBtu / Hr PEAK WATTS 8 XE X 746 / (C X D) CFM (Supply Fans) TOTALS I 'd·,::'-<: TOTAL FAN SYSTEM '· ., POWER DEMAND WATTS/CFM Col. F/Col.G SYSTEM NAME C-36 co--J Nonrssidential Compliance Form DESIGN OUTPUT (BTU/ HR) DESIGN CFM 5°1,t 7 ___ 4-oo I 2,7 boo DESIGN OUTPUT (BTU /HR) 72,0 / .. Z .. 7..- UNITS ed ~ee:£. UNITS J.-15/JF N5/!r RATED EFFICIENCY ALLOWED PROPOSED q ,-5 /f), ?;. /tJ,D //, 7 RATED EFFICIENCY ALLOWED PROPOSED G,B 6. I 6,B 6,3 ECONOMIZER I y IN I DE Dl8L DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD December 1991 PROJECT NAME 13ffC SYSTEM ~AME /}G _-36 Cv-1 I NOTE: Provide one copy of this form for each mochanicaJ system. AREA BASIS OCCUPANCY BASIS REQ'D. SPACE NO. COND. CFM MIN. AREA CFM (SF) PER SF (BXC) NO. MIN. OF CFM PEOPLE (EX 15) O.A. (MAX.OF DORF) DESIGN SUPPLY CFM l}C-j~ 4'13 ,!5 74-4-t;O 74-/275 CJ.)--} 71{), ,/5 /Of&_ 4-bD //)fb /(30 ... - l / ' TOTALS (FOR MECH-2) B I /SZ 118551 .. Minimum Ventilation Rate per Section 2-5321, Table 2-53F. Based on Expected Number of Occupants or at least 50% of Chapter 33 UBC Occupant Density. Must be greater than or equal to G, or use Transfer Air. DAT~ VAV MINIMUM CFM LARGEST DESIGN MIN. MIN. CFM CFM ---- -- ( If zone rehoot or recool ls used, I must be less than or equal to H X 0.3, or less than or equal to B X 0.4, or less than or equal to 300 CFM, whichever Is larger. Must be less than or equal to I (if applicable), but no less than G, unless Transfer Air (K) is used. Must be greater than or equal to (G -H), and, for VAV, greater than or equal to (G -J). mANS- FER AIR - Nonrosidontial Compliance Form 09cember 1991 FARADAY BUSINESS PLAZA UBC APPENDIX 29 REVIEW B Occupancy F Occupancy S Occupancy 2,941 S.F. / 200 = 15 occ. 38,347 S.F. / 2,000 = 20 occ. 3,686 S.F. / 5,000 = 1 occ. B -7.5 M = 1 Fixture 7.5 F = 1 Fixture F -10 M = 1 Fixture 10 W = 1 Fixture S -1 M = 1 Fixture 1 W = 1 Fixture Required Men 3 Fixtures Required = 1.5 Lavs. ~ 2 Lavs. Women 3 Fixtures Required = 1.5 Lavs. ~ 2 Lavs. Provided Men 7 Fixtures / 6 Lavs. Women 6 Fixtures / 5 Lavs. L:\PROJECn9Bfi/es\98264\UBC Append 29 Rev 4-23-99.doc